Agenda packet, regular meeting — Laguna Hills City Council, January 24, 2023 (part 1 of 6)

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS

CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, January 24, 2023 – 7:00 PM
(Closed Session at 6:00 PM when scheduled)
Janine Heft, Mayor
Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore Don Caskey, Council Member Erica Pezold, Council Member Joshua Sweeney, Council Member Location: City Council Chamber, 24035 El Toro Road, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Any person wishing to address the City Council/Planning Agency on any matter, whether or not it appears on this Agenda, is asked to complete a pink “Request to Speak” form available on the table at the back of the Chamber. The completed form is to be submitted to the City Clerk prior to an individual being heard by the City Council/Planning Agency. Completion of the form is voluntary. All persons may attend the meeting regardless of whether this form is completed.

Members of the public wishing to address the City Council can do so during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda with a time limitation of three minutes per person, an overall time limit of ten minutes for any one subject, and a total time limit of thirty minutes for Public Comments. If you are commenting on an Agenda item, your comments will be heard at the time that item is scheduled on the Agenda. If you are addressing the City Council on an item not listed on the Agenda, the City Council is prohibited by law from discussing or taking any action on that item
Submission of Electronic Public Comments: While you may attend this meeting in person, those wishing to make electronic public comments may submit their comments by email to the City Clerk at [email protected], by 5:00 p.m. on January 24, 2023. In the subject line of the email, please state your name and the item number you are commenting on.

Any public comment received that does not specify a particular agenda item number will be announced during the general public comment portion of the agenda. If you wish to submit a public comment on more than one agenda item, please send a separate email for each item you are commenting on. All comments received by 5:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting will be provided to the City Council in advance to allow time for the Council Members to read them.

Announcement of Electronic Public Comments: During the applicable agenda item, the City Clerk will announce the name of the sender and subject matter of all email comments received by 5:00 p.m. on January 24, 2023. Email comments will NOT be read by the City Clerk during the meeting. Electronic public comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. The email comments, including your name, will become part of the record of the City Council meeting and will be public information.

City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 24, 2023 Regular Meeting Agenda
2 GENERAL BUSINESS - CONVENING AT 7:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Resolution No. 96-04-09-1 established rules of decorum for public meetings held by the City of Laguna Hills. Resolution No. 96-04-09-1 is available on the table at the back of the City Council Chamber.

INVOCATION:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Pezold

ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

1. PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS

1.1 Laguna Hills High School Student Liaison Report
Recommendation: That the City Council receive an oral report from Laguna Hills High School 2022 Fall Student Liaison Ella Carnahan.

1.2 Certificate of Recognition - Richard Fiore, 45 Years of Public Service Recommendation: That Mayor Heft present a Certificate of Recognition to Richard Fiore for 45 Years of Public Service on the Moulton Niguel Water District Board of Directors.

2. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS

2.1 Schedule of Future Events
Recommendation: That the City Clerk announce the upcoming meetings and events.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time to address the City Council on any matter not listed on this Agenda that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Public Comments are limited to three minutes per person, an overall time limit of ten minutes for any one subject, and a total time limit of thirty minutes.

City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 24, 2023 Regular Meeting Agenda
3 4. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under “CONSENT CALENDAR” are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendation listed on the Agenda. There will be no separate discussion unless Members of the City Council or Staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar.

4.1 Waive Reading in Full of all Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

4.2 Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting Recommendation: That the City Council approve the City Council Minutes for the January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting.

4.3 Ratification of January 24, 2023, Warrant Register
Recommendation: That the City Council ratify the accompanying Warrant Register for the period from December 30, 2022, to January 12, 2023, in the amount of $1,288,724.35.

4.4 Treasurer's Investment Report for November 2022
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Investment Report for the month of November 2022.

ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

5. PLANNING AGENCY

5.1. ROLL CALL OF PLANNING AGENCY MEMBERS

5.2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time to address the Planning Agency on any matter not listed on this Agenda that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Planning Agency.

Public Comments are limited to three minutes per person, an overall time limit of ten minutes for any one subject, and a total time limit of thirty minutes.

City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 24, 2023 Regular Meeting Agenda
4 5.3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

5.4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS

5.5. PLANNING AGENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.5.1 Site Development Permit/Tentative Parcel Map/Parking Use Permit (SDP/TPM/PUP) No. USE-0105-2022, a Request by Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC for Approval of a Site Development Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, and Joint Use of Parking Facilities to Redevelop the Existing Shopping Center Known as the Laguna Hills Plaza Located at 24791-24881 Alicia Parkway
Recommendation: That the Planning Agency:
1) Conduct a public hearing;
2) Find and determine that the proposed Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction);
3) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A Resolution of the Planning Agency of the City of Laguna Hills, California, Approving Site Development Permit (SDP)/Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)/Parking Use Permit (PUP) No. USE0105-2022, a Request by Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Development, Milan Capital Management, on Behalf of Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC for Approval of a Site Development Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, and Joint Use of Parking Facilities in Order to Redevelop the Existing Shopping Center Known as the Laguna Hills Plaza Located at 24791-24881 Alicia Parkway, Including an Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction).”

PLANNING AGENCY ADJOURNMENT

6. CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS
City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 24, 2023 Regular Meeting Agenda
5 7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS

7.1. City Manager

7.1.1 Discussion on Laguna Hills Civic Center Suite 255 for Use by the Laguna Hills Chamber of Commerce
Recommendation: That the City Council discuss and provide direction to staff.

7.1.2 Discussion of City Council Policy No. 120 Regarding Procedures for Council Members to Place Items on Future City Council Agendas Recommendation: That the City Council discuss and provide input to staff.

7.2. Deputy City Manager/Community Services Director

7.2.1 2022 Post Holiday Events Report
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the report.

8. MATTERS AGENDIZED AND PRESENTED BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

9. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS

9.1. Committee Assignment Reports
Recommendation: That the City Council receive oral reports on the following City Council Committee Assignments:

1. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Board of Directors (Mayor Heft)
November 17, 2022 Annual Workshop.

2. OC Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees (Council Member Pezold)
January 12, 2023, Special Meeting and January 19, 2023, Regular Meeting.

3. Association of California Cities - Orange County
(Mayor Heft)
January 12, 2023, Newly Elected Officials Orientation and Training.

4. Orange County Transportation Authority Citizens Advisory Committee (Mayor Pro Tempore Wheeler)
January 17, 2023, Meeting.

City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 24, 2023 Regular Meeting Agenda
6 10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the City Council/Planning Agency will be February 14, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chamber, located at 24035 El Toro Road, Laguna Hills, California.

CERTIFICATION
I, JENNIFER LEE, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Hills, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Agenda was posted at Laguna Hills City Hall, Laguna Hills Community Center, and the Courtyard at La Paz Center by January 20, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.

January 20, 2023
Jennifer Lee, City Clerk Date
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the office of the City Clerk at (949) 707-2635. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 24035 El Toro Road, Laguna Hills, California, during normal business hours.

City Council Members receive no additional compensation or stipend as a result of simultaneously convening meetings of the Laguna Hills Planning Agency.

City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Lee
City Clerk
ISSUE: Certificate of Recognition - Richard Fiore, 45 Years of Public Service RECOMMENDATION: That Mayor Heft present a Certificate of Recognition to Richard Fiore for 45 Years of Public Service on the Moulton Niguel Water District Board of Directors.

SUMMARY:

Richard Fiore has dedicated 45 years of public service to the residents of Laguna Hills serving as an elected member of the Board of Directors for the Moulton Niguel Water District. Therefore, it is in order to present Mr. Fiore with a Certificate of Recognition recognizing and commending him for his outstanding service to the residents of the City of Laguna Hills and surrounding areas.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Certificate of Recogntion - Richard Fiore

1.2 Packet Pg. 7
inlll ru
CTTYoF LecUNA HITLS
CERTIFICATE oF RECOGNITION i
i

RICHARD FIORE
WHERE AS, Mn Richard Fiore has dedicated 45 years of seraice to the residents of Laguna Hills, seroing &s an electeil member of the Board of Directors for the Moulton Niguel Water District; and
WHER-E AS, during his serpice to the Moulton Niguet Water District Board of Directors, Mr. Fiore has shown exemplary leadership iunny and a strong commitment to the community, seraing in seaeralieadership positiois including is Board President, and currently serztes as Chair of the Ailministratiae Committee; and WHERE AS, Mn Fiore has been an adaocate for regional partnerships to better seft)e the public and was instrumental in the deaeloiment'of the South C-ounty Agencies Working Group to enhance communication around *oig issues for the region; and WHERE AS, Mr. Fiore continues to promote programs and policies that increase customer outreach and education around utatir isiues, proztide high- leael customet seruices, and deliaer tools ancl rebates to help customers saoe utater and money; and Now, THEREFO.RET I, rnnine Heft, Mayor, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, Catifornia, do'hereb{ recognize, Ilicharil Eiare ,for his dedication to the tttater industry inil seraice to thiresidints of Laguna Hilts.

Dated this 24th day of |anuary 2022.

IANINE HEFT, MAYOR
*, ,#

1.2.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Certificate of Recogntion - Richard Fiore (3044 : Certificate of Recognition - Richard Fiore, 45 Years of Public Service MNWD) City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Lee
City Clerk
ISSUE: Schedule of Future Events
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Clerk announce the upcoming meetings and events.

SUMMARY:

City Council Special Meeting for Biennial Commission Interviews & Appointments Tuesday, January 31, 5:00 p.m., Community Development Conference Room Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
Wednesday, February 1, 7:00 pm., Laguna Hills Civic Center Council Chamber Events, Communication, and Beautification Committee Meeting Wednesday, February 8, 3:00 pm., City Hall Admin. Conference Room Food Waste Recycling Virtual Town Hall Meeting
Thursday, February 9, 6:30p.m.

City Council/Planning Agency Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 14, 7:00p.m. Laguna Hills Civic Center Council Chamber Daddy Daughter Dinner Dance (pre-registration is required) Friday, February 17, 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m., Laguna Hills Community Center President’s Day – City Hall Closed (Community Center will be open) Monday, February 20

2.1 Packet Pg. 9
City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Lee
City Clerk
ISSUE: Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Council Minutes for the January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:
• January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes

4.2 Packet Pg. 10

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS

CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES
Tuesday, January 10, 2023
GENERAL BUSINESS - CONVENING AT 7:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Heft.

INVOCATION: Bishop Don Sedgwick of Laguna Hills Ward of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Caskey

ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Janine Heft Mayor Present
Don Caskey Council Member Present
Erica Pezold Council Member Present
Joshua Sweeney Council Member Present
Dave Wheeler Council Member Present

CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
Election of Mayor Pro Tempore
Council Member Caskey nominated Council Member Caskey to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore.

At the request of Council Member Caskey, the following verbatim minutes are hereby provided:
“I would like to make a nomination in defense of decades old procedures and protocols to responsibly rotate leadership positions on this and other city councils in an egalitarian way, where the day-to-day operations of the city are managed by a City Manager and professional staff. I must register a strong protest against perceivable cabal of a few to perpetuate their service as mayor to the extent of two and three times in consecutive years or even two times in four years. We are a council of five people. We are all elected and are tasked to being unselfishly to our community over a series of years.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
2 It is very bothersome that some feel the right to claim the privilege of the leadership position of Mayor to be the province of their own tight little group; all to the detriment of our Community. I ask the citizens of Laguna Hills, what’s going on here?
On that basis of what I consider backroom dealing, I feel compelled to step-up an nominate Council Man Don Caskey, for the office of Mayor Pro-Tem. If confirmed, we might eventually get ourselves back to some sense of normalcy and rationality on the council dais. We need to start being a team and I would like to be some of the glue involved in that.”
Council Member Sweeney nominated Council Member Wheeler to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore.

Council Member Pezold nominated Council Member Caskey for Mayor Pro Tempore.

Mayor Heft called for a vote on the nomination of Council Member Wheeler for Mayor Pro Tempore until December 12, 2023.

RESULT: APPROVED [3 TO 2]
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor; Joshua Sweeney, Council Member; Dave Wheeler, Council Member
NAYS: Don Caskey, Council Member; Erica Pezold, Council Member

RECESS AND RECONVENE
Mayor Heft recessed the meeting at 7:09 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:10 p.m.

1. PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS

1.1 Laguna Hills High School Student Liaison Report
Laguna Hills High School 2022 Fall Student Liaison Kia Arfania was not available at the meeting to provide a report.

2. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS

2.1 Schedule of Future Events
City Clerk Lee announced the upcoming meetings and events.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
3 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals addressed the City Council on non-agendized items:

Dawn Ford, a resident of Laguna Hills, provided public comments regarding concerns for safety on Alicia Parkway during a recent power outage, CR&R requirements for Christmas tree disposal, and commercial advertising in residential neighborhoods.

Public Works Director/City Engineer Ames responded to Council Member requests for additional information.

Sarah Mendoza, District Representative, U.S. Representative Young Kim’s Office, introduced herself as the District 40 contact to Congresswoman Kim’s office and offered her service for any federal needs or matters.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve the Consent Calendar with Mayor Heft removing Item No. 4.5 and Item No. 4.7.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER: Don Caskey, Council Member
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor; Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore; Don Caskey, Council Member; Erica Pezold, Council
Member; Joshua Sweeney, Council Member

4.2 Approval of Minutes for December 13, 2022, Regular Meeting Recommendation: That the City Council approve the City Council Minutes for the December 13, 2022, Regular Meeting.

4.3 Ratification of January 10, 2023, Warrant Register
Recommendation: That the City Council ratify the accompanying Warrant Register for the period from December 2, 2022, to December 29, 2022, in the amount of $1,252,028.28.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
4 4.4 Treasurer's Investment Report for October 2022
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Investment Report for the month of October 2022.

4.6 Amendment to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Operating Budget for Security Patrol Services
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-01-10-2: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, Amending the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget by Increasing the Public Safety Department Operating Budget for Private Security Patrol."

4.8 Newport Bay Watershed TMDL Programs Funding Agreement Recommendation: That the City Council: 1) Approve the “Cooperative Agreement to Fund Total Maximum Daily Load Programs and Related Activities in the Newport Bay Watershed;” 2) Find that environmental review is not required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15060(c)(3), 15378(a) and (b)(2),(4), and 15252; and 3) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Cooperative Agreement.

4.9 Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project Cooperative Agreement
Recommendation: That the City Council: 1) Approve the “Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project Cooperative Agreement” with minor edits as may be required by the City Attorney; 2) Find that environmental review is not required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15301(c), and; 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

4.10 Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Development Impact Fees Annual Report Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Development Impact Fees Annual Report pursuant to California Government Code Section 66006.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

4.5 Retirement Plan Consulting Services Agreement with Shuster Advisory Group, LLC, for Defined Contribution Plan Consulting and Investment Fiduciary Services
Mayor Heft removed Item No. 4.5 from the Consent Calendar to request additional information.

City Manager Hildenbrand responded to Council Member requests for additional information.

Recommendation: That the City Council:
1) Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Retirement Plan Services Agreement with Shuster Advisory Group, LLC for defined contribution plan consulting and investment fiduciary services (Attachment 1); and 2) Approve the consolidation of the 457(b), 401(a), Retirement Health Savings (RHS) and Part-Time, Temporary and Seasonal (PTS) record keeping services to a single provider, MissionSquare; and
3) Adopt Resolution No. 2023-01-10-1: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California Authorizing the Transition of the City's Defined Contribution Plan for Eligible Employees from Public Agency Retirement to the ICMA Retirement Corporation Governmental Profit-Sharing Plan & Trust." ; and 4) Authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary service provider agreements related to the administration of the defined contribution plans; and 5) Appoint the City Manager as the contract administrator for the City's 457(b), 401(a), Retirement Health Savings (RHS) and Part-Time, Temporary and Seasonal (PTS) defined contribution plans.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Don Caskey, Council Member
SECONDER: Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor; Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore; Don Caskey, Council Member; Erica Pezold, Council
Member; Joshua Sweeney, Council Member

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
6 4.7 Budget Amendment for Sidewalk Repairs, CIP No. 106 Mayor Heft removed Item No. 4.7 from the Consent Calendar to express her support for the project.

Recommendation: That the City Council: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2023-01-10-3:
"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, Amending the Fiscal Years 2021-2022 & 2022-2023 Biennial Budget to Allocate Funds to Sidewalk Repairs, Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. 106;” and 2) Find that environmental review is not required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15301 as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption - "Existing Facilities." RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER: Don Caskey, Council Member
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor; Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore; Don Caskey, Council Member; Erica Pezold, Council
Member; Joshua Sweeney, Council Member

5. PLANNING AGENCY
There were no separate Planning Agency Business Items for this meeting.

6. CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no City Council Public Hearings.

7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS

7.1. City Manager
City Manager Hildenbrand introduced the City’s new Finance Director, Eric Hendrickson.

7.2. City Clerk

7.2.1 City Council Representatives to Other Committees/Agencies City Clerk Lee reviewed the information provided in the staff report and responded to Council Member requests for additional information.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
7 Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions:
1) Review the City of Laguna Hills City Council Representatives to Other Committees/Agencies List, provide directions to staff regarding any necessary changes for appointments to the list, and by motion, approve the City Council Representatives to Other Committees/Agencies List, as revised by the City Council; and
2) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California designating and appointing its Representative to the Orange County Fire Authority’s Board of Directors; “and 3) Approve and direct the City Clerk to prepare and post an updated FPPC Disclosure Form 806 to reflect all paid city representative appointments to outside agency boards, committees, and/or commissions in accordance with state law.

Mayor Heft called for a vote to appoint Council Member Caskey as representative to the Orange County Fire Authority’s Board of Directors.

RESULT: FAILED [UNANIMOUS]
AYES: Don Caskey, Council Member; Erica Pezold, Council Member
Motion to appoint Council Member Sweeney as representative to the Orange County Fire Authority’s Board of Directors and adopt Resolution No. 2023-01-10-4: “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California designating and appointing its Representative to the Orange County Fire Authority’s Board of Directors.”
RESULT: APPROVED [3 to 2]
MOVER: Janine Heft, Mayor
SECONDER: Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor; Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore; Joshua Sweeney, Council Member
NAYS: Don Caskey, Council Member, Erica Pezold, Council Member

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
8 Motion to approve the City Council Representatives to Other Committees/Agencies List, as revised by the City Council and approve and direct the City Clerk to prepare and post an updated FPPC Disclosure Form 806.

RESULT: APPROVED [4 to 1]
MOVER: Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER: Janine Heft, Mayor
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor; Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore; Erica Pezold, Council Member, Joshua Sweeney, Council
Member
NAYS: Don Caskey, Council Member

7.3. Chief of Police Services

7.3.1 Laguna Hills Polices Services Public Safety Quarterly Report Chief of Police Services Captain De La Rosa reviewed the information provided in the staff report, provided a PowerPoint presentation, and responded to Council Member requests for additional information.

The following individual addressed the City Council on this item:

Neel Patel, a resident of Laguna Hills, requested statistical comparisons to other local cities.

Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Laguna Hills Police Services Public Safety Quarterly Report for the Third Quarter 2022.

RESULT: RECEIVE AND FILE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER: Don Caskey, Council Member
AYES: Janine Heft, Mayor, Dave Wheeler, Mayor Pro Tempore; Don Caskey, Council Member, Erica Pezold, Council
Member, Joshua Sweeney, Council Member

8. MATTERS AGENDIZED AND PRESENTED BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

8.1. Council Member Wheeler

8.1.1 RHNA Building Ordinance
Council Member Wheeler tabled Item No. 8.1.1 for consideration at the regular meeting scheduled for February 14, 2023.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
9 Recommendation: Council Member Wheeler recommends that the City Council direct staff and legal to prepare a city ordinance with the guidelines presented in the RHNA Building Ordinance presentation and that a preliminary draft be presented at the next Council meeting in January.

9. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS

9.1. Committee Assignment Reports
Recommendation: That the City Council receive oral reports on the following City Council Committee Assignments:

1. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Board of Directors (Mayor Heft)
November 17, 2022 Annual Workshop.

Mayor Heft indicated that she will provide a report at the next meeting

2. OC Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees (Council Member Pezold)
December 15, 2022 Meeting.

Council Member Pezold provided no report.

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS
Council Member Caskey
Council Member Caskey indicated disappointment in the ununified City Council and expressed his hope for the Council to come together.

Mayor Heft
Mayor Heft concurred with Council Member Caskey comments and indicated she would like to have a unified Council as well.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council at this session, Mayor Heft declared the meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m.

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills City Council/Planning Agency Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes
10 Jennifer Lee, City Clerk
ATTEST:

Janine Heft, Mayor
Approved at meeting of January 24, 2023

4.2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: January 10, 2023 CC Regular Meeting Minutes (3052 : Approval of Minutes for January 10, 2023, Regular Meeting) City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Eric Hendrickson
Finance Director
ISSUE: Ratification of January 24, 2023, Warrant Register RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ratify the accompanying Warrant Register for the period from December 30, 2022, to January 12, 2023, in the amount of $1,288,724.35.

SUMMARY:

The City issues accounts payable disbursements on a regular basis and presents it to City Council for ratification at its next regularly scheduled City Council Meeting. The attached Warrant Register containing checks and electronic funds transfers for the period from December 30, 2022, to January 12, 2023, is being presented for ratification by the City Council. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff. The Finance Director certifies to the accuracy of the attached register and to the availability of monies for payment thereof.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Warrant Register - January 24, 2023
• Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023

4.3 Packet Pg. 21
Payment Amount
794.44
628.00
16,471.32
79,495.18
641.17
3,644.70
125.00
8,723.07
4,853.52
1,312.50
950.25
6,291.00
1,571.68
316.61

65.65 191.01
150.39
5,000.00
500.00
22,570.15
160.38
197.48
293.94
144.02
910.61
216.21
214.76
121.66
13,086.74
15,828.09
186.38
124.99

37.74 11,285.64
228.51

6.92 12,796.28

32.00 677.35
987.25
1,099.18
1,816.80

38.14 86.00
279.00
692.00
50,963.67
49,855.00
13,112.98
3,000.00
448.35
1,188.00
526.48
1522 R-1830 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 01/05/2023
1523 R-1985 REGIONAL FIRST AID, INC 01/05/2023
1524 R-1977 RJ ELECTRIC 01/05/2023
1/13/2023 10:41:50 AM Page 1 of 4
1557 E-0610 ENGRAVING, AWARDS & GIFTS 01/12/2023
1558 C-1190 FINGERPRINT ID (AFIS) LAW ENF. - COUNTY OF ORANGE 01/12/2023 1559 M-1388 MOBILE MINI, INC. 01/12/2023
1554 C-1203 CHRISTMAS KINGS, THE 01/12/2023
1555 C-0362 CITY OF LAKE FOREST 01/12/2023
1556 D-0581 DECKARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC 01/12/2023
1551 B-0304 BEE MAN, THE 01/12/2023
1552 C-1133 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 01/12/2023
1553 C-1144 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC 01/12/2023
1548 O-1575 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER-FREEDOM CA. NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP 01/12/2023 1549 A-0349 A SOURCE OF PRIDE 01/12/2023
1550 A-0190 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 01/12/2023 1545 T-2698 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 01/12/2023
1546 V-2224 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/12/2023
1547 W-2450 WEX BANK 01/12/2023
1542 S-1904 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/12/2023
1543 S-1904 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/12/2023
1544 S-1980 STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACCOUNTING OFFICE 01/12/2023 1539 Q-1707 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS 01/12/2023
1540 S-1902 SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC 01/12/2023
1541 S-1949 SMART AND FINAL 01/12/2023
1536 N-1500 NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT FUND TRUST 01/12/2023 1537 P-1833 PEZOLD, ERICA 01/12/2023
1538 P-1832 PRINTEX PRINTING AND GRAPHICS INC. 01/12/2023 1533 C-0023 COX COMMUNICATION 01/12/2023
1534 I-0942 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 01/12/2023
1535 M-1302 MOULTON NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT 01/12/2023
1530 U-2165 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SO CALIFORNIA 01/05/2023 1531 Z-CD-0379 LARA, JEREMY 01/11/2023
1532 B-0437 BRINKS, INCORPORATED 01/12/2023
1527 S-2250 SPARKLETTS 01/05/2023
1528 S-2209 STUDIO TWO BLACK DIAMOND 01/05/2023
1529 W-2302 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 01/05/2023
1521 P-1839 PAPER DEPOT 01/05/2023
1525 Z-CS-0402 RODRIGUEZ, MARCELA 01/05/2023
1526 S-1902 SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC 01/05/2023
1519 N-1474 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 01/05/2023
1520 O-1546 OFFICE SOLUTIONS 01/05/2023
1518 N-1499 NEXTREQUEST 01/05/2023
1515 G-0862 GRANICUS 01/05/2023
1516 H-0829 HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC. 01/05/2023
1517 J-1057 JAMEY CLARK, INC. 01/05/2023
1512 C-1122 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL AND DATA, INC. 01/05/2023 1513 D-0561 DOCU-TRUST 01/05/2023
1514 E-0504 EL TORO WATER DISTRICT 01/05/2023
1509 A-0138 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 01/05/2023
1510 C-1008 COUNTY OF ORANGE, NPDES 01/05/2023
1511 C-0023 COX COMMUNICATION 01/05/2023
Payment Type: Regular
1507 Z-CD-0399 NASSAERNIA, MAHNAZ 01/05/2023
1508 A-0380 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL SERVICES 01/05/2023 Warrant Register - January 24, 2023
City of Laguna Hills, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023
Check Number Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date

4.3.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Payment Amount
2,875.52
87,636.69
256.04
1,493.40
1,405.00
4,546.91
450.00
2,445.00
6,000.00

65.00 422.38
490.00
Total Regular: 443,024.13
1/13/2023 10:41:50 AM Page 2 of 4
1569 T-2707 TIPTON, ERIK 01/12/2023
1570 T-2712 TOTAL SOURCE OFFICEWORKS 01/12/2023
1571 W-2377 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 01/12/2023
1566 R-1977 RJ ELECTRIC 01/12/2023
1567 R-1946 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 01/12/2023
1568 S-2308 SPECTRUM SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. 01/12/2023 1563 O-1575 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER-FREEDOM CA. NEWSPAPER PARTNERSHIP 01/12/2023 1564 C-1003 PARKING VIOLATIONS OC TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 01/12/2023 1565 P-1834 PLACEWORKS, INC. 01/12/2023
1560 N-1493 NEXUSTEK 01/12/2023
1561 N-1474 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 01/12/2023
1562 O-1546 OFFICE SOLUTIONS 01/12/2023
Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 Date Range: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023 Check Number Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date

4.3.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Payment Amount
12,259.13
1,772.77
15,391.76
4,337.12
147.79
1,756.18
190.00
809,845.47
98 73 0.00 1,288,724.35
1/13/2023 10:41:50 AM Page 3 of 4
Bank Drafts 8 8 0.00 845,700.22
EFT's 0 0 0.00 0.00
Manual Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Total Bank Draft: 845,700.22
Bank Code AP Bank Summary
Payable
Count
Payment
Payment Type Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 90 65 0.00 443,024.13
DFT0002309 B-0276 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 01/11/2023
DFT0002310 B-0276 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 01/11/2023
DFT0002311 C-1007 OCSD LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT, OC TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 01/12/2023 DFT0002306 B-0276 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 01/11/2023
DFT0002307 B-0276 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 01/11/2023
DFT0002308 B-0276 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 01/11/2023
Payment Type: Bank Draft
DFT0002304 H-0966 HIGH LEVEL SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. 01/06/2023 DFT0002305 B-0276 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 01/11/2023
Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 Date Range: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023 Check Number Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date

4.3.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) 998 POOL 1/2023 1,288,724.35
1,288,724.35
1/13/2023 10:41:50 AM Page 4 of 4
98 73 0.00 1,288,724.35
Fund Summary
Fund Name Period Amount
Bank Drafts 8 8 0.00 845,700.22
EFT's 0 0 0.00 0.00
Manual Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payable
Count
Payment
Payment Type Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 90 65 0.00 443,024.13
Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 Date Range: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023

4.3.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Warrant Register - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Amount
01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMDEV Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-225-610000 25.00 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMDEV Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-225-646100 122.79 1/13/2023 10:43:00 AM Page 1 of 6
01/05/2023 PAPER DEPOT IN18186-8483 Professional Services, City Clerk, Oct & Dec '22
100-155-700030 65.65
01/05/2023 COUNTY OF ORANGE, NPDES PW230422 Watershed Monitoring, CIP #410 100-600-790600 79,495.18 01/06/2023 HIGH LEVEL SECURITY SOLUTIONS,
INC.
5515 Private Security Patrol, Dec '22 100-420-720850 12,259.13 01/05/2023 RODRIGUEZ, MARCELA FRD-0292 Refund, Facility Deposit, R #1035020.002
100-000-222000 500.00
01/05/2023 OFFICE SOLUTIONS I-02077627 Office/Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-620000 74.36 01/05/2023 OFFICE SOLUTIONS I-02077627 Office/Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-622000 242.25 01/05/2023 STUDIO TWO BLACK DIAMOND 99574 Printing Services, Dec '22 100-195-623000 122.05 01/05/2023 STUDIO TWO BLACK DIAMOND 99575 Printing Services, Dec '22 100-195-623000 75.43 01/05/2023 NASSAERNIA, MAHNAZ CD-0914-USE-0118-2022 Refund, Plan App Deposit, REC008694-2022100-000-223000 794.44 01/05/2023 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 81960 Crossing Guard Services, 11/27/22 - 12/10/22
100-420-720822 7,118.52
01/05/2023 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 847251482 Subscription, City Clerk, Nov '22 100-155-626000 293.94 01/05/2023 REGIONAL FIRST AID, INC 88369 Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-622000 150.39 01/05/2023 RJ ELECTRIC 78563 Public Works Other Maint, Dec '22 100-355-720410 2,300.00 01/05/2023 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 81264 Crossing Guard Services, 10/30/22 - 11/12/22
100-420-720822 5,767.56
01/05/2023 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 81617 Crossing Guard Services, 11/13/22 - 11/26/22
100-420-720822 3,585.24
01/05/2023 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 73707 Monthly and Misc Landscape, Dec 100-355-720700 948.73 01/05/2023 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 73743 Monthly and Misc Landscape, Dec 100-355-720700 134.28 01/05/2023 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 73744 Monthly and Misc Landscape, Dec 100-355-720700 193.23 01/05/2023 JAMEY CLARK, INC. 73584 Graffiti Removal, Public Works, Dec 100-355-720500 286.50 01/05/2023 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 73705 Monthly and Misc Landscape, Dec 100-355-720700 49.10 01/05/2023 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 73706 Monthly and Misc Landscape, Dec 100-355-720700 246.34 01/05/2023 RJ ELECTRIC 61474 Parks Contract Repair, Dec '22 100-355-720701 2,700.00 01/05/2023 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL

SERVICES
673363 Landscape Maintenance, Dec '22 100-355-720700 628.00 01/05/2023 JAMEY CLARK, INC. 73583 Graffiti Removal, Public Works, Dec 100-355-720500 663.75 01/05/2023 NEXTREQUEST 25224 Professional Services, City Clerk, FY 22/23
100-155-700030 6,291.00
01/05/2023 SPARKLETTS 4228482 123022 Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-622000 160.38 01/05/2023 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL AND DATA,
INC.
4296-22-012 Traffic Signal Maintenance, Dec '22 100-356-720420 3,644.70 01/05/2023 GRANICUS 160394 Agenda Software, 1/1/23 - 3/31/23 100-195-720050 4,853.52 01/05/2023 HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC. 22-0681(HCI#3502) Traffic Signal Mgmt Services, CIP 168, Nov '22
100-356-700101 1,187.50
01/05/2023 HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC. 22-0681(HCI#3502) Traffic Signal Mgmt Services, CIP 168, Nov '22
100-600-790600 125.00
01/05/2023 COX COMMUNICATION 121722 T-1 Line, Dec '22 100-195-630000 641.17 01/05/2023 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 122134761_22C88209 Operating Supplies, Comm Svcs, Dec '22
100-310-622005 24.67
01/05/2023 SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC 122822 Street Lights, Traffic Control, Oct & Nov '22
100-356-631400 22,570.15
01/05/2023 DOCU-TRUST 048381 Offsite Data Storage, Dec '22 100-155-700030 125.00 01/05/2023 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 1122134611_22C72297 Special Events-Program Service, Dec '22
100-310-695500 88.39
01/05/2023 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 1122134651_22C75798 Special Events-Program Service, Dec '22
100-310-695500 77.95
Payables Detail Report
City of Laguna Hills, CA By Fund
Payment Dates 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023
Payment Date Vendor Name Payable Number Description (Payable) Account Number Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND
01/05/2023 EL TORO WATER DISTRICT 010423 Water Usage, Public Works, Nov '22 100-355-635000 8,723.07

4.3.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Amount
1/13/2023 10:43:00 AM Page 2 of 6
01/12/2023 COX COMMUNICATION 121922 WiFi, City Hall, Dec '22 100-195-630000 182.62 01/12/2023 MOULTON NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT 122922 Water Usage, Public Works, Dec '22 100-355-635000 13,086.74 01/12/2023 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 165251446-0 Communications Expense, Jan '23 100-195-630000 677.35 01/12/2023 BEE MAN, THE 120784 Bee Removal, Public Works, Dec '22 100-355-720701 279.00 01/12/2023 BRINKS, INCORPORATED 12165468 Courier Fee, Armored Transport, Jan '23
100-155-625000 216.21
01/12/2023 COX COMMUNICATION 121822 Cable, City Hall, Dec '22 100-195-630000 32.14 01/12/2023 PEZOLD, ERICA 011123 Travel Reimbursement, LOCC, Sep 100-155-612001 186.38 01/12/2023 TIPTON, ERIK 1008 Professional Services, IT, Jan '23 100-195-647000 65.00 01/12/2023 DECKARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC 1188 Professional Services, FY 22/23 100-155-700000 3,000.00 01/12/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 010423 - Acct #700697306974 Street Lights, Traffic Control, Sep-Dec '22
100-355-631000 6.92
01/12/2023 NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT

FUND TRUST
010923 Refund Opioid Settle Fees 100-000-459000 15,828.09 01/12/2023 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
011023 Membership, Public Works, 2023 100-355-646100 86.00 01/12/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 010323 - Acct #700234509668 Street Lights, Traffic Control, Nov & Dec '22
100-356-631400 11,960.67
01/12/2023 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 010423 Water Usage, Public Works, Dec '22 100-355-635000 121.66 01/12/2023 SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC 010423 Street Lights, Traffic Control, Dec '22 100-356-631400 11,285.64 01/12/2023 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 00623592 Professional Services, GRA-03-21- 0006, Jun '22
100-000-220444 196.00
01/12/2023 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 00623594 Professional Services, TM-0004- 2021, Jun '22
100-000-220444 294.00
01/12/2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 010323 - Acct #700234509668 Street Lights, Traffic Control, Nov & Dec '22
100-355-631000 835.61
01/11/2023 LARA, JEREMY CD-0870-BLDR-1225-2022aRefund, Permit Fees, REC-007481- 2022
100-000-442000 169.41
01/12/2023 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTERFREEDOM CA. NEWSPAPER 0000553547 Legal Advertising, Oct '22 100-155-624001 1,816.80 01/12/2023 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTERFREEDOM CA. NEWSPAPER 0000557422 Legal Advertising, Dec '22 100-155-624001 1,493.40 01/11/2023 LARA, JEREMY CD-0870-BLDR-1225-2022aRefund, Permit Fees, REC-007481- 2022
100-000-221011 1.00
01/11/2023 LARA, JEREMY CD-0870-BLDR-1225-2022aRefund, Permit Fees, REC-007481- 2022
100-000-221012 4.00
01/11/2023 LARA, JEREMY CD-0870-BLDR-1225-2022aRefund, Permit Fees, REC-007481- 2022
100-000-227001 736.20
01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-355-720500 13.99 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-355-720700 3,379.63 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-356-646100 84.21 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-000-220444 28.00 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-355-622000 12.85 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-355-720410 597.13 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 POLSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-420-622000 1,624.70 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 POLSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-420-646100 47.46 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 POLSVCS (9014) Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-420-610000 190.00 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 GENGOV1 Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-155-622000 478.77 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 GENGOV1 Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-195-617000 694.00 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 POLSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-420-621000 84.02 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-910500 2,555.38 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-355-720700 1,600.00 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 GENGOV1 Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-155-612000 600.00 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-695500 9,229.74 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-695502 10.99 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-695531 1,388.80 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-624500 39.95 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-645500 3.75 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-646100 314.44 Payment Date Vendor Name Payable Number Description (Payable) Account Number 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-195-940000 226.24 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 COMSVCS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 100-310-613100 22.47 Payables Detail Report Payment Dates: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023

4.3.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Amount
1/13/2023 10:43:00 AM Page 3 of 6
Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Total: 1,261,070.24
Fund: 212 - MEASURE M
01/05/2023 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF

SO CALIFORNIA
1220220367 Street Maintenance, Dec '22 212-355-720400 106.25 01/05/2023 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF

SO CALIFORNIA
22-2302235 Street Maintenance, Dec '22 212-355-720400 37.77 01/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA VISA CARD 122022 PUBWKS Departmental Expenditure, Dec '22 212-355-720400 221.31 01/12/2023 OFFICE SOLUTIONS I-02080483 Office Supplies, Jan '23 100-195-620000 256.04 01/12/2023 OCSD LAW ENFORCEMENT

CONTRACT, OC TREASURER-TAX
SH 64282 Law Enforcement Services, Jan '23 100-420-720800 809,845.47 01/12/2023 FINGERPRINT ID (AFIS) LAW ENF. -

COUNTY OF ORANGE
SH 64308 Fingerprint ID System Charges, Jan 100-420-720835 1,188.00 01/12/2023 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS 9201971752 Pre-employment Drug Testing, Dec 100-195-617000 37.74 01/12/2023 VERIZON WIRELESS 9923843155 Communication Expense, Dec '22 100-195-630000 987.25 01/12/2023 PARKING VIOLATIONS OC

TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR
DEC 22 Parking Fee Surcharge, Dec '22 100-420-720823 1,405.00 01/12/2023 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9016352337 Storage Rental, Community Center, 12/27 - 1/23/23
100-310-641000 82.97
01/12/2023 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9016365580 Storage Rental, Community Center, 12/28 - 1/24/23
100-310-641000 217.80
01/12/2023 A SOURCE OF PRIDE 9110606 Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-622000 38.14 01/12/2023 WEX BANK 85951119 COMSVCS Vehicle Fuel, Dec '22 100-310-613100 117.93 01/12/2023 WEX BANK 85951316 POLSVCS Vehicle Fuel, Dec '22 100-420-613100 295.44 01/12/2023 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9016300537 Storage Rental, Community Center, 12/21 - 1/17/23
100-310-641000 225.71
01/12/2023 WEX BANK 85951079 COMDEV Vehicle Fuel, Dec '22 100-225-613100 260.76 01/12/2023 WEX BANK 85951118 PUBWKS Vehicle Fuel, Dec '22 100-356-613100 419.05 01/12/2023 WEX BANK 85951118 PUBWKS Vehicle Fuel, Dec '22 100-356-646100 6.00 01/12/2023 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC 65218 Professional Services, Dec '22 100-225-700000 33,954.87 01/12/2023 NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. 73585 Monthly and Misc Landscape, Dec 100-355-720700 87,636.69 01/12/2023 PLACEWORKS, INC. 80350 Housing Element, Nov '22 100-225-700225 4,546.91 01/12/2023 STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

ACCOUNTING OFFICE
628248 Pre-employment Fingerprinting, Dec
'22
100-195-617000 32.00
01/12/2023 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC 65173-A City Hall DrainagePublic Works Other, Dec '22 100-355-720410 3,150.00 01/12/2023 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC 65173-B S/B Moulton & Via Lomas Public Works Other, Dec '22 100-355-720410 375.00 01/12/2023 SMART AND FINAL 3831400029005 Office & Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-622000 33.16 01/12/2023 ENGRAVING, AWARDS & GIFTS 420019 Office Supplies, Jan '23 100-155-620000 448.35 01/12/2023 RJ ELECTRIC 61521 Parks Contract Repair, Jan '23 100-355-720701 450.00 01/12/2023 SMART AND FINAL 3831400021901 Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-155-622000 56.60 01/12/2023 SMART AND FINAL 3831400029005 Office & Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-155-622000 47.47 01/12/2023 SMART AND FINAL 3831400029005 Office & Operating Supplies, Dec '22 100-195-620000 91.28 01/12/2023 PRINTEX PRINTING AND GRAPHICS
INC.
23834 Special Events, Holiday Season
Events Banner
100-310-695500 124.99
01/12/2023 NEXUSTEK 282680 Professional Services, Software Support, Oct '22
100-195-720050 2,875.52
01/12/2023 TOTAL SOURCE OFFICEWORKS 30727 Furniture, Community Ctr, Jan '23 100-310-930000 422.38 01/12/2023 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 2211006 Engineering Services, USE-0105- 2022, Nov '22
100-000-452001 (1,835.00)
01/12/2023 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 2211006 Engineering Services, USE-0105- 2022, Nov '22
100-225-700201 1,835.00
01/12/2023 CHRISTMAS KINGS, THE 22-655-2 Special Events, Program Service, Holiday Lights
100-310-695500 49,855.00
01/12/2023 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 2211005 Engineering Services, USE-0105- 2022, Nov '22
100-000-452001 (610.00)
01/12/2023 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 2211005 Engineering Services, USE-0105- 2022, Nov '22
100-225-700201 610.00
01/12/2023 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 2211006 Engineering Services, USE-0105- 2022, Nov '22
100-000-223000 1,835.00
Payables Detail Report Payment Dates: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023 Payment Date Vendor Name Payable Number Description (Payable) Account Number 01/12/2023 SPECTRUM SPORTS MANAGEMENT,
INC.
2023-02 Event Management Services, 1/2
Marathon
100-310-695507 6,000.00
01/12/2023 RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 2211005 Engineering Services, USE-0105- 2022, Nov '22
100-000-223000 610.00

4.3.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Amount
01/05/2023 COUNTY OF ORANGE, NPDES PW230422 Watershed Monitoring, CIP #410 600-254-950410 79,495.18 Fund 600 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Total: -
Grand Total: 1,288,724.35
1/13/2023 10:43:00 AM Page 4 of 6
Fund 307 - C & D FORFEITED DEPOSITS Total: 13,112.98
Fund: 600 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
01/05/2023 HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC. 22-0681(HCI#3502) Traffic Signal Mgmt Services, CIP 168, Nov '22
600-000-490100 (125.00)
01/05/2023 HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC. 22-0681(HCI#3502) Traffic Signal Mgmt Services, CIP 168, Nov '22
600-251-950168 125.00
01/05/2023 COUNTY OF ORANGE, NPDES PW230422 Watershed Monitoring, CIP #410 600-000-490100 (79,495.18) Fund: 221 - SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM
01/12/2023 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 11406022 Senior Mobility Program, Nov '22 221-310-720000 692.00 Fund 221 - SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM Total: 692.00
Fund: 307 - C & D FORFEITED DEPOSITS
01/12/2023 CITY OF LAKE FOREST 1264 MOU LH/LF Franchise Procurement, Oct '22
307-355-700000 11,073.85
01/12/2023 CITY OF LAKE FOREST 1265 MOU LH/LF Franchise Procurement, Nov '22
307-355-700000 2,039.13
Payables Detail Report Payment Dates: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023 Payment Date Vendor Name Payable Number Description (Payable) Account Number 01/12/2023 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC 65173 Road Maintenance, Dec '22 212-355-720400 13,483.80 Fund 212 - MEASURE M Total: 13,849.13

4.3.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) 1/13/2023 10:43:00 AM Page 5 of 6
100-310-930000 Furniture 422.38 422.38
100-355-622000 Operating Supplies 12.85 12.85
100-355-631000 Utilities - Electric 842.53 842.53
100-355-635000 Utilities - Water 21,931.47 21,931.47
100-355-646100 Maint & Repairs - Vehicles 86.00 86.00
100-310-695500 Special Events-Program Service 59,376.07 59,376.07 100-310-695502 Special Needs Program 10.99 10.99
100-310-695507 Marathon 5k 6,000.00 6,000.00
100-310-695531 Heritage Day 1,388.80 1,388.80
100-310-910500 Equip & Mach-CommCtr 2,555.38 2,555.38
100-310-622005 Operating Supplies Comm Ctr 24.67 24.67
100-310-624500 Advertising-Program Services 39.95 39.95 100-310-641000 Rent/Lease - Equipment 526.48 526.48
100-310-645500 Maint&Repair-Facility Comm Ctr 3.75 3.75 100-310-646100 Maint & Repairs - Vehicles 314.44 314.44 100-225-646100 Maint & Repairs - Vehicles 122.79 122.79 100-225-700000 Prof. Svcs - Building & Safety 33,954.87 33,954.87 100-225-700201 Plan Application 2,445.00 2,445.00
100-225-700225 Housing Element 4,546.91 4,546.91
100-310-613100 Vehicle-Fuel 140.40 140.40
100-195-647000 Maint & Repair - Comp Eqpt 65.00 65.00
100-195-720050 Contract Serv-Software Support 7,729.04 7,729.04 100-195-940000 Computer Hardware & Software 226.24 226.24 100-225-610000 Memberships and Dues Expense 25.00 25.00 100-225-613100 Vehicle-Fuel 260.76 260.76
100-195-617000 Recruitment 763.74 763.74
100-195-620000 Office Supplies 421.68 421.68
100-195-622000 Operating Supplies 624.32 624.32
100-195-623000 Printing 197.48 197.48
100-195-630000 Telephone & Communication 2,520.53 2,520.53 100-155-624001 Advertising - Legal 3,310.20 3,310.20
100-155-625000 Postage & Delivery 216.21 216.21
100-155-626000 Subscriptions & Books 293.94 293.94
100-155-700000 Professional Services 3,000.00 3,000.00
100-155-700030 Professional Svcs- City Clerk 6,481.65 6,481.65 100-000-459000 Miscellaneous Revenue 15,828.09 15,828.09 100-155-612000 Travel, Conferences & Meetings 600.00 600.00 100-155-612001 Travel - League of CA Cities 186.38 186.38 100-155-620000 Office Supplies 448.35 448.35
100-155-622000 Operating Supplies 582.84 582.84
100-000-222000 Refundable Deposits 500.00 500.00
100-000-223000 Plan Application Deposit 3,239.44 3,239.44 100-000-227001 SecurityDeposit-WasteRecycling 736.20 736.20 100-000-442000 Building Related Permits 169.41 169.41
100-000-452001 Planning & Zoning Related Fees (2,445.00) (2,445.00) Grand Total: 1,288,724.35 1,288,724.35
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount Payment Amount 100-000-220444 EncroachmentGrading 518.00 518.00
100-000-221011 Building Standards Fee 1.00 1.00
100-000-221012 SB1186 ADA CASp Fees 4.00 4.00
Fund Expense Amount Payment Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND 1,261,070.24 1,261,070.24
212 - MEASURE M 13,849.13 13,849.13
221 - SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM 692.00 692.00
307 - C & D FORFEITED DEPOSITS 13,112.98 13,112.98
600 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - -
Payables Detail Report Payment Dates: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023 Report Summary
Fund Summary

4.3.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Expense Amount Payment Amount
**None** 1,288,724.35 1,288,724.35
Grand Total: 1,288,724.35 1,288,724.35
1/13/2023 10:43:00 AM Page 6 of 6
307-355-700000 Professional Services 13,112.98 13,112.98 600-000-490100 Transfer In- General Fund (79,620.18) (79,620.18) 600-251-950168 TrafficSignalmprovCoordination 125.00 125.00 600-254-950410 NPDES Permit & Fees 79,495.18 79,495.18
Grand Total: 1,288,724.35 1,288,724.35
100-420-720835 Fingerprint Identification Svc 1,188.00 1,188.00 100-420-720850 Private Security Patrol 12,259.13 12,259.13 100-600-790600 Transfers Out - Capital Imprv 79,620.18 79,620.18 212-355-720400 Street Maintenance 13,849.13 13,849.13
221-310-720000 Contract Services 692.00 692.00
100-420-622000 Operating Supplies 1,624.70 1,624.70
100-420-646100 Maint & Repairs - Vehicles 47.46 47.46
100-420-720800 General Law Enforcement 809,845.47 809,845.47 100-420-720822 Crossing Guard Services 16,471.32 16,471.32 100-420-720823 Parking Citation Processing 1,405.00 1,405.00 100-356-700101 MOE Traffic Engineer Services 1,187.50 1,187.50 100-356-720420 MOE Traffic Signal Maintenance 3,644.70 3,644.70 100-420-610000 Memberships and Dues Expense 190.00 190.00 100-420-613100 Vehicle-Fuel 295.44 295.44
100-420-621000 Computer Supplies 84.02 84.02
100-355-720700 Landscape Maintenance Contract 94,816.00 94,816.00 100-355-720701 Parks Contract Repair 3,429.00 3,429.00
100-356-613100 MOE Vehicle Fuel 419.05 419.05
100-356-631400 MOE Electricity-Streetlights & 45,816.46 45,816.46 100-356-646100 MOE Maintenance & Repairs 90.21 90.21
Payables Detail Report Payment Dates: 12/30/2022 - 01/12/2023 Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount Payment Amount 100-355-720410 Street Sweeping 6,422.13 6,422.13
100-355-720500 Graffiti Removal 964.24 964.24

4.3.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Payables Detail Report - January 24, 2023 (3055 : Warrant Register, January 24, 2023) City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2023
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Eric Hendrickson
Finance Director
ISSUE: Treasurer's Investment Report for November 2022
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Investment Report for the month of November 2022.

SUMMARY:

The Treasurer’s Investment Report for the month of November 2022 is submitted herewith. The City’s total portfolio as of November 30, 2022 was $21,919,091. The pooled cash portfolio managed by the City Treasurer consisted of cash on hand, demand deposits, State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and Investment Trust of California (CalTRUST) investments and totaled $20,052,230. Restricted cash and investments totaled $1,866,861, and is mainly comprised of reserve funds for the 2010 bond issuance.

Interest income for the month of November was $4,466. FY 2022-2023 year-to-date interest earnings of $55,233 are 55% of the annual budget of $100,000.

The average yield on the City’s total portfolio for the month of November was 1.91%, compared to the prior month of 1.74%. The improvement in portfolio yield in November compared to October was the result of a slightly higher cash balance, along with higher yields in the existing investment pools.

The $3.5 million transfer from Union Bank to LAIF in the prior month put the total percentage of the City-managed portfolio represented by LAIF investments at 78%, which exceeded the 75% limit set forth in the City’s investment policy. This condition will be corrected in December.

4.4 Packet Pg. 32
Treasurer's Report for November 2022
January 24, 2023

Page 2 ends

ATTACHMENTS:
• Treasurer's Report - November 2022

4.4 Packet Pg. 33

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022)

4.4.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Treasurer's Report - November 2022 (3056 : Treasurer's Report for November 2022) City of Laguna Hills
City Council/Planning Agency
Staff Report
DATE: January 24, 2023
TO: Chair and Agency Members
FROM: Larry Longenecker
Community Development Director
ISSUE: Site Development Permit/Tentative Parcel Map/Parking Use Permit (SDP/TPM/PUP) No. USE-0105-2022, a Request by Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC for Approval of a Site Development Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, and Joint Use of Parking Facilities to Redevelop the Existing Shopping Center Known as the Laguna Hills Plaza Located at 24791-24881 Alicia Parkway RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Agency:
1) Conduct a public hearing;
2) Find and determine that the proposed Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction);
3) Adopt a Resolution entitled: “A Resolution of the Planning Agency of the City of Laguna Hills, California, Approving Site Development Permit (SDP)/Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)/Parking Use Permit (PUP) No. USE-0105-2022, a Request by Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Development, Milan Capital Management, on Behalf of Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC for Approval of a Site Development Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, and Joint Use of Parking Facilities in Order to Redevelop the Existing Shopping Center Known as the Laguna Hills Plaza Located at 24791-24881 Alicia Parkway, Including an Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction).”

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 44
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 2 ends

SUMMARY:

The approximately 9.6-acre Laguna Hills Plaza (“Center”) is an existing commercial retail center located on the southwest corner of Alicia Parkway and Hon Avenue. The Center currently consists of a mix of retail, restaurants, and services uses. Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Development, Milan Capital Management, on Behalf of Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC (“Applicant”) is requesting approval of the following requested entitlements applications (“Project”):
• A Site Development Permit (SDP) for a variety of site and architectural improvements to the Center, including a comprehensive building façade upgrade, a redesigned parking lot, and renovated landscaping; and • A Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) (PM No. 2022-189) to subdivide the site from two parcels into three parcels to facilitate the separate and independent development, ownership, financing, and operation of the proposed Project; and • A Joint Parking Use Permit (PUP) to establish shared parking for the Center.

The proposed Project includes façade upgrades to all buildings in the Center, the demolition of two existing buildings, construction of three new buildings, and a variety of site improvements. One of the primary purposes of the Project is to replace the Dick’s Sporting Goods building with a new grocery building. The proposed Project results in an overall reduction in total building area, from 106,285 to 101,413 square feet, and does not include any significant change to the existing building footprints of the major tenants and inline shops buildings. The proposed upgrades to the building elevations reflect a ‘California Contemporary’ architectural theme, which is described in the Architecture section in this report. The Project also includes redesign of the parking lot, new sound walls along the southern property boundary and abutting the new loading dock behind the new grocery building, new and upgraded trash enclosures, and upgraded landscaping and LED parking lot lighting.

The Project will result in a total of 500 parking stalls that will be shared by tenants and visitors. Based on the parking requirements identified in the Laguna Hills Municipal Code, at full tenant occupancy, the Center would require 614 parking stalls, resulting in a deficit of 114 stalls. The Applicant prepared a parking study which concludes that utilizing a shared parking approach results in an actual peak parking demand of 438 parking stalls. Shared parking allows multiple uses within a shopping center to share

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 45
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 3 ends

parking stalls to meet parking demand, assuming those uses have staggered parking demand periods throughout the day, and assuming potential for customers to visit multiple businesses during each visit to the multi-tenant center. When factoring in the existing vacancies and including a 10% buffer, the result is a surplus of 62 parking stalls.

Staff has determined, based on the results of the Parking Study and the use of shared parking, that there will be adequate parking.

The Project complies with all requirements of the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Code. Table LU-1 of the General Plan and Section 9-29.010 of the Zoning Code identify the purpose and intent of land uses within the Neighborhood Mixed Use designation, which include the creation of attractive neighborhood-level centers that promote a more active, vibrant street life; increase pedestrian activity and reduce vehicular traffic; provide storefront style shopping streets; and/or encourage walking and social interaction. The Project is consistent with and enhances these objectives.

The Project application underwent a preliminary review by the Economic Development Committee (EDC), comprised of Mayor Pro Tempore Dave Wheeler and Councilmember Don Caskey, during a noticed public meeting on July 18, 2022, at which time the intended mix of tenants at the Center, adequacy of parking, and proposed architectural design were discussed. The EDC meeting was open to the public and interested members of the public were invited to comment on the application as well.

This Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction). In addition, staff has determined that the Project, subject to conditions of approval, will not result in any significant adverse impacts to the public health, safety or general welfare. The design of the Project will provide a compatible land use within the Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district and will expand the types of commercial retail facilities and services available within the community. As conditioned, the Project will be a pleasant upgrade to Laguna Hills Plaza as the Center continues to provide a mix of retail uses and services.

Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Project, subject to the conditions of approval contained within the proposed Resolution (Attachment A).

AUTHORITY:

Title 9 of the Laguna Hills Municipal Code (“LHMC”) contains the City of Laguna Hills Development Code (also commonly referred to as the “Zoning Code” or the “Code”).

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 46
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 4 ends

The process the City must follow in reviewing new development projects is found in Chapter 9-92 of the Code. Section 9-92.080 of the Code grants the Community Development Director the authority to review and approve SDP’s for commercial properties with development not exceeding 20,000 square feet. However, the proposed SDP is being considered in conjunction with a request for a PUP, which grants the Planning Agency the authority to review and approve (LHMC 9-92.030).

The process the City must follow in reviewing a Joint Parking Use Permit is found in LHMC Chapter 9-44 Access and Parking, and LHMC Chapter 9-92 Application Process and Submittal Requirements. LHMC Section 9-44.070 (Joint Use of Parking Facilities) describes how the sharing of parking facilities can be approved, as long as there is sufficient parking for all existing and proposed uses within a site.

Chapter 9-86 of the City’s Development Code adopts the County of Orange subdivision ordinance and manual as the City’s subdivision ordinance as it existed on December 20, 1991 (the “Subdivision Code”). Subdivisions must be consistent with the Subdivision Code, the Laguna Hills General Plan, and applicable development standards including lot size, lot coverage, density, and setbacks.

The findings required for the aforementioned application entitlement types are found in Section 9-92.080 of the Code. Accordingly, staff has prepared findings demonstrating that the application and the requested entitlements comply with the Zoning Code and the General Plan as stated in the proposed Resolution (Attachment A).

BACKGROUND:

The Laguna Hills Plaza, located on the southwest corner of Alicia Parkway and Hon Avenue (24791-24881 Alicia Parkway), is an existing 9.63-acre commercial retail center.

The Center was approved by the County of Orange and constructed in the late1970s/early-1980s (SP-79-5P). The Center is comprised of two anchor tenants (Big Lots and Dick’s Sporting Goods), a variety of in-line shops and restaurants, and two pad buildings (multi-tenant and a Carl’s Jr. drive-thru restaurant), with a combined total of 106,285 square feet of retail space divided between 24 tenant spaces.

The former Chase Bank building is on a separate property, and is not a part of the Center. The Center has remained essentially unchanged from its original approval, and the property maintains coordinated traffic circulation, parking, and landscaping.

To the east of the property, across Alicia Parkway, are three new drive-thru restaurants

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 47
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 5 ends

(Taco Bell, Plant Power, Starbucks) and a Public Storage facility. To the north, across Hon Avenue, is an existing commercial retail center, Honali Plaza. To the west and south, abutting the project site, are existing single-family homes.

Figure 1 below is a vicinity map of the Project:

Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS:

The Applicant requests approval of a Site Development Permit for a variety of site and building upgrades, a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property, and a Parking Use Permit to establish shared parking for the Center (Attachment B).

Overview
The proposed Project includes the demolition and rebuild of Building A; currently a 45,013 square-foot retail store (Dick’s Sporting Goods), to be replaced by a 42,709 square-foot grocery store building (Building A-1). No changes are proposed to the

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 48
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 6 ends

footprint of Building B, currently a 25,532 square foot retail store (Big Lots). The new configuration of Building A will result in new tenant spaces (Building A-2), with up to two new restaurants and associated covered patio seating areas, located between Buildings A-1 and B. No interior changes are proposed for the remaining existing in-line shops, Buildings C and D (Attachment B; Sheets 01 – 03).

To facilitate redesign of the parking lot, the standalone 6,642 square-foot pad building adjacent to Hon Avenue, currently consisting of retail and medical office uses, will be demolished. A new 3,500 square-foot pad building is proposed along Alicia Parkway that will accommodate retail and/or restaurant uses (Attachment B; Sheets 17 -18). The proposed redevelopment results in a reduction in the Center’s total building area, from 106,285 to 101,413 square feet.

The 2,497 square-foot Carl’s Jr. drive-thru restaurant is not in the Project’s scope, and will remain as is. The former Chase Bank building is on a separate parcel, under different ownership, and is not a part of the Project’s scope.

Site Design/Circulation
There are currently five vehicular access points for the Center; two on Alicia Parkway and three on Hon Avenue. These unsignalized driveways will remain unchanged as part of the Project. Commercial delivery vehicles are expected to continue to take access from Hon Avenue, and exit onto Alicia Parkway (Attachment B; Sheet 07).

The Project includes the redesign of the Center’s parking lot to accommodate the new grocery store and the new pad building. The existing parking lot, with angled parking spaces and one-way drive aisles, will be reconfigured with 90-degree parking spaces and two-way drive aisles. The Project includes a new pedestrian pathway that provides a connection between the Major Tenants and the new pad building along Alicia Parkway.

To accommodate this new pad, the existing Bank of America Automated Teller Machine will be relocated to near the proposed pedestrian pathway.

The Project also includes an update to the outdoor dining area located in front of Building C. Currently, the outdoor dining area used by the restaurant tenant (Natraj Cuisine of India) consists of a wrought-iron fence with retractable umbrellas. The area will be redesigned with plank wood/composite panels and modular glass that will complement the Center’s proposed architectural upgrades.

Other site improvements include new and upgraded trash enclosures and compactors,

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 49
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 7 ends

which will meet the needs and demands of current tenants as well as the new grocery store, while complying with the State’s new waste management requirements. An existing trash enclosure behind Building A will be demolished to accommodate improved truck circulation for the drive aisle. The existing at-grade loading dock for Building A will be reconfigured into a depressed loading dock for the grocery store that will accommodate two trucks.

The Project also includes two new concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls; a 12‐foot high CMU wall located on the west side of the truck loading area for the proposed grocery store, and a 6‐foot high CMU wall that will run along the southern property line. The walls are designed to minimize any potential noise impacts from the Project (Attachment B; Sheet 19).

Architecture
The proposed Project includes façade upgrades to all buildings in the Center (Attachment B; Sheets 09 - 18). The upgrades do not result in a significant change to the footprints/square footage of the buildings. The current building elevations, which have remained unchanged from their original County approval, consist of sloped Spanishstyle tile roofs with beige/tan stucco walls. The proposed upgrades to the building elevations have been designed to reflect a ‘California Contemporary’ architectural theme, which is more of a modern approach that uses massing, articulated facades with offset surfaces, and material change to create variety. This design style includes the use of crisp lines and smooth surfaces. The building façades also include new aluminum storefronts, wood veneer, smooth stucco finishes, and strategically-placed metal awnings and overhangs. The proposed cart coral in front of the grocery tenant will incorporate perforated metal panels. Roof heights fluctuate to provide a varying roofline and architectural projections, with heights varying between 16 to 36 feet, well below the 40-foot maximum building height allowed in the NMU zoning district. All rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened.

The update to the front elevation of Building B includes two ‘accent bands’, with color to be proposed by a future tenant (Attachment B; Sheet 12). Staff does not support the colored accent bands utilizing primary colors (e.g., red, blue, etc.) which are often used in corporate branding such that the accent bands would be used as signage/advertising.

Staff supports a cornice color that complements the architectural upgrades, and has recommended Condition of Approval No. 17 to limit the colored cornice accent bands on Building B.

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 50
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 8 ends

The Applicant intends to submit a separate application at a later date to amend the Center’s Master Sign Program (MSP) to be consistent with the proposed façade update.

The MSP will include wall signs, wayfinding and directional signs, and monument signs.

Condition of Approval No. 18 requires that the Applicant submit an MSP for review and approval prior to final building inspection and/or issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy.

Landscaping/Lighting
Landscaping throughout the Project site consists of native and drought-tolerant plants (Attachment B; Sheet 04). Mostly utilized around the site are various trees and shrubs, with no turf areas. The proposed tree palette includes London Planetree, Natchez Crape Myrtle, Carrotwood, and Brisbane Box. All palm trees will be replaced with canopy trees to provide additional shade opportunities around the Center. The shrub and groundcover palette will be determined as part of the Final Landscaping review process (Condition of Approval No. 12).

Two existing Eucalyptus trees in the slope area behind the grocery tenant will removed to accommodate the site redesign. Two new trees are proposed in the same slope area to offset loss of the existing trees (Attachment B; Sheet 04).

Parking lot lighting proposed throughout the Center will utilize 35-foot-tall light poles with lamps that are shielded on all sides. The Applicant intends to reuse the existing poles as they were recently installed. All lighting will be designed and located to ensure light is confined within the Project boundaries to avoid offsite spillage and impacts to nearby uses. The submitted photometric plan (Attachment B; Sheet 06) confirms the Project will meet the City’s minimum required lighting standards and avoid lighting that spills over onto adjacent properties or public rights-of-way.

Tentative Parcel Map
The Applicant proposes to subdivide the 9.63-acre property into three parcels. The parcels will be subdivided as follows:
• Parcel 1 (8.47 acres) will encompass Building A-1, Building A-2, Building B, all inline shops, and the parking field directly in front of and to the side of the buildings.
• Parcel 2 (0.45 acres) will encompass the Carl’s Jr. building and abutting parking

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 51
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 9 ends

area.
• Parcel 3 (0.71 acres) will encompass the proposed pad building along Alicia Parkway and abutting parking area.

The proposed Parcel Map will facilitate the separate and independent development, ownership, financing, and operation of the proposed Project. However, as conditioned, the Center will continue to operate as one site with coordinated traffic circulation, parking, and landscaping.

As identified on the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, the property is encumbered by multiple existing and proposed easements. The Public Works and Community Development Departments have reviewed and determined that none of the easements are in conflict with the proposed Project.

Chapter 9-86 of the City’s Development Code require subdivisions to be consistent with the County subdivision ordinance as it existed on December 20, 1991, the Laguna Hills General Plan, and applicable development standards including lot size, lot coverage, density, and setbacks. Table 1 below summarizes the characteristics of the property upon completion of the subdivision and compares them to the Code’s development standards.

Table 1 - Compliance with Development Standards
Development Standard Required Standard Proposed Standard Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq. ft.

Parcel 1: 368,936 sq. ft.

Parcel 2: 19,465 sq. ft.

Parcel 3: 30,929 sq. ft.

Minimum Lot Width 50 ft.

Parcel 1: 794 ft.

Parcel 2: 149 ft.

Parcel 3: 202 ft.

Minimum Lot Depth 100 ft.

Parcel 1: 685 ft.

Parcel 2: 128 ft.

Parcel 3: 152 ft.

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 52
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 10 ends

Maximum Density 0.30 FAR
Parcel 1: 0.25
Parcel 2: 0.13
Parcel 3: 0.11
Minimum Front Building
Setback 20 ft.

Parcel 1: 450 ft.

Parcel 2: 54 ft.

Parcel 3: 28 ft.

Minimum Front Parking
Lot Setback
10 ft. Parcel 1: 28 ft.

Parcel 2: 10 ft.

Parcel 3: 22 ft.

Minimum Side Setback 10 ft. Parcel 1: 38 ft.

Parcel 2: 20 ft.

Parcel 3: 36 ft.

Minimum Rear Setback 10 ft. Parcel 1: 42 ft.

Parcel 2: 14 ft.

Parcel 3: 26 ft.

As shown in the table above, all three parcels in the proposed subdivision meet all of the Code’s applicable development standards.

Traffic Impact Analysis
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan Engineers (dated December 20, 2022) to evaluate and determine the potential traffic impacts associated with the Project and buildout of the property (Attachment C).

Buildout of the property could potentially occur with four development scenarios, all of which include replacement of the 45,013 square-foot Dick’s Sporting Goods with a 42,709 square-foot grocery store, and the demolition of the existing 6,642 square-foot “shops building” adjacent to Hon Avenue. The development scenario proposed as part of the Project is Option 1B. The differences in the four potential scenarios are as follows:
• Option 1A and 1B: Construct 3,362 square feet of in-line restaurants with 1,000

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 53
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 11 ends

square feet of outdoor seating between Buildings A1 and B. o Option 1A: Construct a new 2,500 square-foot fast-food restaurant with drive-thru, adjacent to Alicia Parkway. Option 1A will result in a total of 100,409 square feet of retail, restaurant, office, and health club/martial arts studio uses.
o Option 1B: Construct a new 5,001 square-foot building consisting of retail and fast-food restaurant adjacent to Alicia Parkway, without a drive-thru.

Option 1B will result in a total of 102,910 square feet of retail, restaurant, office, and health club/martial arts studio uses.
• Option 2A and 2B: Expand the existing 25,532 square-foot Building B by 7,908 square feet.
o Option 2A: Construct a new 2,500 square-foot fast-food restaurant with drive-thru. Option 2A will result in a total of 103,955 square feet of retail, restaurant, office, and health club/martial arts studio uses. o Option 2B: Construct a new 5,001-square foot building consisting of retail and fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 2B will result in a total of 106,456 square feet of retail, restaurant, office, and health club/martial arts studio uses.

The TIA concluded that none of the four development scenarios would cause Level of Service (LOS) traffic impacts, would not result in adverse queuing conditions at Caltrans intersections (i.e., freeway offramp), and the Project is screened out from further Vehicular Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment because it can be presumed to have lessthan significant impact on VMT, being a local serving land use located in a low-VMT area. The TIA also analyzed access to the site, and concluded that there would be adequate storage for inbound/outbound movements at each of the site access points, with a few exceptions. These exceptions result in the need for off-site improvements, including eastbound left-turn pocket and median improvements along Alicia Parkway (Condition of Approval No. 16). The existing eastbound left-turn pocket on Alicia Parkway will be extended to provide a queue storage length of 135 feet to fully accommodate queues entering the Project site.

The development scenario proposed as part of the Project is Option 1B. However, if at a later date the property owner decides to consider another option, as identified above,

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 54
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 12 ends

the approval of this TIA would clear the alternative future development scenario from the need to prepare a new Traffic Impact Analysis. Any future development alternative, other than the currently proposed Option 1B, would be subject to LHMC process requirements (e.g., Conditional Use Permit for drive-thru restaurant) and standards.

Joint Parking Use Permit
The Applicant has applied for a Joint Parking Use Permit (PUP), which includes a Parking Study (“Study”) prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan Engineers (dated December 20, 2022) (Attachment D). The Study follows the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI’s) parking methodology for shopping centers to determine the appropriate methods for estimating the Project’s parking requirements. Parking counts were taken at one-hour intervals on Thursday – Saturday, November 4 –6, 2021, from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. These days and hours of observation were chosen to capture the busiest weekday and weekend days of the week. The Study concluded that the peak parking demand observed for the existing tenants occurred on Saturday at 1:00 pm.

The proposed Project reconfigures the parking lot, resulting in a change to the parking inventory. The existing parking supply of 531 spaces will be revised to 500 spaces under all four development scenarios. The Study also concludes that there would be adequate parking supply in the future that could fully meet the total parking needs of the Center with development of the Project.

Furthermore, when analyzing shared parking, the City has typically increased required parking by an additional 10% as a best practice to account for potential parking demand fluctuations. The Study concludes that the most intense development scenario is Option 2B, which corresponds to a peak shared parking demand of 438 spaces, and a surplus of 62 spaces under weekday conditions. Therefore, utilizing the ULI-based approach to estimating the shared parking needs of mixed-use developments results in surpluses that exceed the typical/industry threshold, as well as the City’s best practice, of 10% minimum surplus under each of the development scenarios (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B).

With a proposed parking inventory of 500 stalls, a projected surplus will remain available for the Center, which results in an adequate number of parking stalls to accommodate the proposed use mix of tenants during all times of the year, assuming a full tenant occupancy scenario. Approval of the proposed PUP will reflect the Center’s actual parking demand, and enable the Applicant to use the Center’s surplus parking capacity for a wide range of potential new tenants that may require a higher parking

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 55
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 13 ends

demand, such as health clubs, medical offices, and restaurants.

Economic Development Committee
The Project application underwent a preliminary review by the Economic Development Committee (EDC), comprised of Mayor Pro Tempore Dave Wheeler and Councilmember Don Caskey, during a noticed public meeting on July 18, 2022, at which time the intended mix of tenants at the Center, adequacy of parking, and proposed architectural design were discussed. The EDC meeting was open to the public and interested members of the public were invited to comment on the application as well. The Applicant has incorporated the EDC’s suggestions with significant modification to the proposed façade renovation, including multiple revisions and meetings with staff to arrive at the current proposal.

General Plan Consistency/Alicia Gateway Opportunity Area To approve the Project, the Planning Agency must find that the Project is consistent with the Laguna Hills General Plan. Staff has concluded that the Project is consistent with several General Plan Goals and Policies. Specifically, the Project:
• Creates diverse and vibrant activity centers and events that bring people together as a community. (Goal LU-1).
o Promotes walkability throughout the community through enhanced pedestrian amenities, attractive streetscapes, plazas, and civic gathering areas (Policy LU-1.4).
o Increases opportunities for pedestrian and bicycle connections to activity centers by well-designed and shaded pathways (Policy LU-1.6). • Is compatible and interdependent with neighboring uses (Goal LU-2). o Improves connections with surrounding uses by enhancing landscaping, providing pedestrian connections, incorporating green areas, and planting street trees (Policy LU-2.2).
o Minimizes impacts to surrounding neighborhoods and land uses through context-sensitive site design and architecture (Policy LU-2.8). • Proposes infill development that involves the revitalization of property in an

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 56
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 14 ends

economically and environmentally sustainable manner (Goal LU-3). o Encourages new development that uses land efficiently and offers flexibility to changing resident and shopping needs, contributing to the long-term vitality of the community (Policy LU-3.2).
o Ensures safe, efficient pedestrian connections are made between adjacent neighborhoods, sidewalks, parking areas, and entrances to stores (Policy LU-3.3).
o Incorporates open spaces, plazas, and outdoor dining areas into new development and redevelopment to provide visual relief and community gathering spaces (Policy LU-3.4).
o Creates safe, inviting, and functional pedestrian and cyclist environments in new public and private development (Policy LU-3.10). • Places a high priority on design, architecture, and landscaping that reflect the community’s identity and gracious lifestyle (Goal LU-4). o Creates distinctive gateway architecture, landscaping, and signs at major entries to the community and in community activity centers (Policy LU4.1). o Encourages developers to create unique project identities that enhance the overall character of the City (Policy LU-4.8).
• Expands the variety of services, shopping, and entertainment opportunities in the community (Goal LU-6).
• Facilitates the creation and expansion of private sector businesses and associated local career choices for Laguna Hills residents (Goal LU-7). o Encourages private property owners to revitalize, upgrade, and beautify aging and underperforming commercial and business areas (Policy LU-7.4).

The proposed Project is also located within the Alicia Gateway Opportunity Area (“AGOA”). As part of the City’s 2009 Comprehensive General Plan Update, the City Council adopted the AGOA, which encompasses the entire Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district, including Laguna Hills Plaza. The Planning Agency must determine if the

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 57
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 15 ends

Project is consistent with the vision for the AGOA, which seeks to create a moderate density center and gathering place by promoting:
• A mix of retail, housing, and office uses;
• Walkable connections, plazas, and green space for community gatherings; • High-quality design and architecture;
• Orientation of buildings toward the street and pedestrians; • Accessibility to transit; and
• Connectivity to promote walking from nearby neighborhoods to the Gateway.

The proposed Project is consistent with the vision and requirements of the AGOA. The Project:
• Will continue to add to the mix of land uses in the area and provides new services that are otherwise limited in the NMU zoning district;
• Will be walkable to other existing commercial/retail uses within the AGOA, as well as surrounding residential neighborhoods;
• Continues the high-quality design and architecture envisioned for the AGOA and is an aesthetic improvement to the neighborhood while providing a compatible development that respects the existing commercial development on Alicia Parkway and the adjacent single-family residential neighborhood; • Will provide outdoor dining areas for gatherings oriented toward Alicia Parkway.

CONCLUSION:

Staff supports the proposed Project as it continues to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Alicia Gateway Opportunity Area. The Project will facilitate outdoor gathering opportunities and provides new development opportunities that use land efficiently and offer flexibility to changing resident and shopping needs, contributing to the long-term vitality of the community. The proposed upgraded architecture of the buildings and various site improvements all complement the existing surrounding land uses and comply with the development standards in the Zoning Code.

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 58
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 16 ends

The proposed Tentative Parcel Map complies with all requirements of the Laguna Hills Municipal Code and County Subdivision Manual as it existed on December 20, 1991, pursuant to LHMC Chapter 9-86 (Subdivisions). Approval of the TPM will not increase the development intensity or change allowable uses beyond what is already permitted.

Given the results of the Parking Study, it is appropriate to establish a shared parking approach at the Center through the City’s Joint Parking Use Permit process and allow the Applicant the opportunity to establish a more efficient approach for use of the Center’s parking supply pursuant to LHMC Section 9-44.070. This approach uses actual parking counts to determine parking need, rather than strictly utilizing the City’s standard parking requirements found in LHMC Table 9-44.A. The Study demonstrates that the Center’s peak parking demand is far below the parking required by Code.

Therefore, approval of the PUP will reflect the Center’s actual parking demand, and enable the Applicant to use the Center’s surplus parking capacity for a wide range of potential new tenants that may require a higher parking demand.

With the recommended Conditions of Approval, the Project meets development standards and design guidelines of the Code and meets the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed Project.

PUBLIC NOTICE:

The proposed Project was advertised in an adjudicated newspaper of general circulation on January 12, 2023. In addition, 71 property owners within 300 feet of the Property and all current tenants of Laguna Hills Plaza were mailed a public hearing notice. To date, no comments have been received. Any written comments received will be distributed at the Planning Agency Public Hearing.

CEQA FINDINGS:

Staff has reviewed the proposed Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that this project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction). The Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The Class 2 exemption applies to the replacement

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 59
SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)
January 24, 2023

Page 17 ends

or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. The proposed Project consists of reconstructed buildings, a façade upgrade, and parking and landscape redesign of an existing commercial retail center, with a reduction of total building area.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval
• Attachment B – Plan Set
• Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis
• Attachment D – Parking Study

5.5.1 Packet Pg. 60
1746691.1
RESOLUTION NO. PA2023-01-24-X

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP)/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
(TPM)/PARKING USE PERMIT (PUP) NO. USE-0105-2022,

A REQUEST BY BRET BERNARD, DIRECTOR OF

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, MILAN CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT, ON BEHALF OF LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA,

LLC FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT,

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND JOINT USE OF PARKING

FACILITIES IN ORDER TO REDEVELOP THE EXISTING

SHOPPING CENTER KNOWN AS THE LAGUNA HILLS
PLAZA LOCATED AT 24791-24881 ALICIA PARKWAY,

INCLUDING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15301 AND 15302 OF TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 3 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS (CLASS 1, EXISTING FACILITIES; CLASS
2, REPLACEMENT OR RECONSTRUCTION)
The Planning Agency of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows:

WHEREAS, Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Development, Milan Capital Management, on Behalf of Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC (the “Applicant”), has filed an application for Site Development Permit (SDP)/Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)/Parking Use Permit (PUP) No. USE-0105-2022 for a variety of site and architectural improvements to the Laguna Hills Plaza, including building reconstruction, a comprehensive building façade upgrade, a redesigned parking lot, and renovated landscaping, at 24791-24881 Alicia Parkway (“Project Site” or “Center”), in the Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) zoning district (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Project is hereby found to be Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301 (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction) of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Agency held a duly noticed public hearing and considered public comments and written and oral information and testimony presented by City staff, community residents, and other interested members of the public at a duly noticed public hearing held on January 24, 2023; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 2 ends

1746691.1

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING AGENCY OF THE CITY OF

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The Planning Agency hereby determines that the required findings by the City for approval of Site Development Permit/Tentative Parcel Map/Parking Use Permit No. USE-0105-2022 have been met and made as follows:

Site Development Permit

1. The site design complies with standards of the Development Code.

The existing site design and building architecture was entitled and constructed under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange. The Project includes an update to the site design that complies with the development standards of the Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district, including maximum lot coverage, density/FAR, setbacks, and other required development standards. With approval of the proposed Joint Parking Use Permit, the parking inventory allows for the proposed updates.

2. The site is suitable for the proposed development.

The site design aspects of the Project will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, surrounding development and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City. These aspects include setbacks, access, landscaping/lighting, and other architectural site design elements (i.e., height, scale, mass, and appearance). The updated buildings reflect a contemporary architectural theme incorporating visual interest and building articulation. Conditions of approval have been included to ensure the Project will be compatible with the surrounding area with respect to noise, parking, and public safety.

3. The project is consistent with the General Plan and applicable design guidelines.

As part of the City’s 2009 Comprehensive General Plan Update, the City Council adopted the Alicia Gateway Opportunity Area (AGOA), which encompasses the entire Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) zoning district, including the project site.

The AGOA/NMU seeks to “create a moderate density center and gathering place by promoting a mix of retail, housing, and office uses; walkable connections, plazas, and green space for community gatherings; high-quality design and architecture; orientation of buildings toward the street and pedestrians; accessibility to transit; connectivity to promote walking from nearby neighborhoods to the Gateway” (General Plan Land Use Element pp. LU-20 – 21). The AGOA designation also promotes the development of vertical and horizontal mixed-use.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 3 ends

1746691.1
Allowed uses include commercial, retail, office, and residential; however, standalone residential is prohibited (Laguna Hills General Plan, 2009).

The Project is consistent with the vision and requirements of the AGOA. The Project will continue to add to the mix of land uses in the area and provide new opportunities that are otherwise limited in the NMU zoning district. The Project continues the high-quality design and architecture envisioned for the AGOA and is an aesthetic improvement to the neighborhood. The Project will facilitate outdoor gathering opportunities and provides new development opportunities that use land efficiently and offer flexibility to changing resident and shopping needs, contributing to the long-term vitality of the community.

4. The site design and structural components are appropriate for the site and function of the proposed uses.

The Project will be of quality design with an appropriately-scaled framework of architectural and landscaping elements. In the event circulation/parking issues occur on the site, Joint Parking Use Permit conditions of approval require the Applicant to resolve such conditions by identifying and implementing appropriate circulation improvements working with the City. The new facilities have been designed to meet all development standards. High-quality development features will be provided throughout the Center through site design (e.g., building and outdoor orientation, walls, and screening), architecture (e.g., mass, scale and form, style, material and color) and landscaping (e.g., screening, and parking lot trees and shade). Development of the Project, as conditioned, will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, surrounding development, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City.

Tentative Parcel Map

1. That the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan:

The General Plan land use designation of the Property is Neighborhood Mixed Use, which provides areas for a variety of different, compatible land uses to exist in proximity. The intent of the Neighborhood Mixed Use designation is to create attractive neighborhood-level centers that promote a more active, vibrant street life; increase pedestrian activity and reduce vehicular traffic; provide storefront style shopping streets; that provide a variety of compact, multi-family housing types close to jobs and services; and/or encourage walking and social interaction. Within the Neighborhood Mixed Use designation, appropriate land uses include mid-box anchors; administrative and professional uses; grocery and specialty stores; business support uses; eating and drinking establishments; cinemas; personal services; residential condos, apartments, and townhomes; and mixed-use structures. Existing uses on the Property include retail, restaurant, and personal service businesses permitted within the Neighborhood Mixed Use land use designation.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 4 ends

1746691.1

2. That the design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan:

The General Plan land use designation of the Property is Neighborhood Mixed Use, which is implemented by the Neighborhood Mixed Use chapter in the City's Development Code. Besides the new pad building along Alicia Parkway, all development at the project site already exists and has supported the retail/personal services uses of the Property since the late 1970’s. The proposed subdivision merely creates separate properties for separate ownership of the two ‘pads’ along Alicia Parkway.

3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development:

No physical development is proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision.

Besides the new pad building along Alicia Parkway, all development at the Project site already exists and has supported the retail/personal services uses of the Property since the late 1970s. The proposed subdivision merely creates separate properties for separate ownership of the two ‘pads’ along Alicia Parkway.

4. That the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied:

The proposed subdivision has been deemed exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act based upon CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15302 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 1, Existing Facilities; Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction). The Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The Class 2 exemption applies to the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. The proposed Project consists of building reconstruction, a façade upgrade, and parking and landscaping redesign of an existing commercial retail center, and results in a reduction of total building area.

5. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development:

Limited physical development is proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision. Besides the new pad along Alicia Parkway, all development at the project site already exists and has supported the retail/personal services uses of the Property since the late 1970s. The proposed subdivision merely creates separate properties for separate ownership of the two ‘pads’ along Alicia Parkway.

The total building square footage is decreasing, resulting in a reduced density of development.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 5 ends

1746691.1

6. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish or wildlife or their habitat.

7. That the design of the subdivision and the type of improvements proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.

Limited physical development is proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision. Besides the new pad along Alicia Parkway, all development at the Project site already exists and has supported the retail/personal services uses of the Property since the late 1970s. The proposed subdivision merely creates separate properties for separate ownership of the two ‘pads’ along Alicia Parkway.

8. That the design of the subdivision and the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements of record or established by court judgment acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or, if such easements exist, that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.

The proposed subdivision will occur on a site with existing development and easements that have adequately supported the improvements without issue.

9. That the design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are suitable for the uses proposed and the subdivision can be developed in compliance with the applicable zoning regulations pursuant to Section 7-9-254 of the subdivision code.

Section 7-9-254 of the subdivision code relates to the parcel map's conformity with applicable zoning standards. The existing land use mix at the project site was developed in compliance with Section 7-9-254 of the subdivision code and will not change as a result of this subdivision proposal.

Joint Parking Use Permit

1. The proposed Joint Parking Use Permit is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Development Code.

The City’s parking requirements are contained in LHMC Chapter 9-44. The intent of the parking requirements in the Development Code is to ensure that all land uses provide safe access and on-site circulation with adequate off-street parking facilities. The Development Code allows for shared use of parking facilities provided that it can be shown that adequate parking for all users is maintained.

The Applicant has demonstrated that based upon the existing actual demand at

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 6 ends

1746691.1
the Center for existing uses, and the code-required parking for vacancies and future uses, there is sufficient parking for the planned tenant mix, including uses that may have higher parking ratios than retail and restaurant uses. A comprehensive shared parking plan allows additional flexibility in leasing to a larger variety of users and allows a more efficient use of the existing parking supply. Condition of Approval No. 16 provides the Community Development Director with the ability to address parking and/or circulation issues relative to any change in any use or any portion of any use (i.e., change in tenant mix) in the Center to ensure the proposed Joint Parking Use Permit remains consistent with the requirements of the development code.

2. The Joint Parking Use Permit provides a reasonable and enforceable means for all uses to share parking facilities.

The shared parking approach proposed for the Center is enforceable upon all current and future tenants to ensure the parking is available for the shopping center. Any changes to the property affecting access or parking would require City approval, at which time the impact on shared parking would be evaluated. This Permit is binding and enforceable against the property owner and all existing and future owner(s) and tenants of the Center per the project conditions of approval.

Additionally, the Community Development Director is able to evaluate the available parking supply for any change in tenant mix at the Center as provided for in Condition of Approval No. 16.

3. The requirement for parking established by the Joint Parking Use Permit shall assure that the parking demands for the participating uses are continually met.

This Permit is binding and enforceable against the property owner and all existing and future owner(s) and tenants of the Center per the conditions of approval.

Additionally, the Community Development Director is able to evaluate the available parking supply when any change in tenancy, or mix of uses is proposed at the subject site as provided for in Condition of Approval No. 16. Therefore, parking demand will continually be met at the Center. Should a parking issue occur resulting from a change in the tenancy or mix of uses, the Community Development Director, per Condition of Approval No. 16, can require the property owner to provide a parking study to demonstrate that parking is still sufficient.

4. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.

The Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. In particular, with regard to parking, the General Plan under the Mobility Element (M15) states the importance of utilizing a broad range of parking management tools to balance parking spillover effects and excessive parking requirements, to encourage efficient use of the land. Currently, the subject parking lot is often underutilized. Establishing formal shared parking will allow additional businesses that could not otherwise locate in the Center, utilizing currently underused parking, while still providing adequate parking for all users.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 7 ends

1746691.1

5. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.

The Project Site is located in the Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district, on the southwest corner of Alicia Parkway and Hon Avenue. To the east of the property, across Alicia Parkway, are three new drive-thru restaurants (Taco Bell, Plant Power, Starbucks) and a Public Storage facility. To the north, across Hon Avenue, is an existing commercial retail center, Honali Plaza. To the west and south, abutting the Project Site, are existing single-family homes. The Project is comprised of two anchor tenants, a variety of in-line shops and restaurants, and two pad buildings, with a combined total of 101,413 square feet of retail space.

The uses in the Center currently consist of a mix of retail, restaurants, and services uses. The proposal to use shared parking on the Project Site is consistent with the commercial nature of the property’s use. Numerous commercial properties within the City utilize shared parking as an opportunity to allow a variety of commercial uses within a shopping center. Conditions of approval ensure the use of shared parking on the site will not be materially detrimental. For example, Condition of Approval No. 16 requires the property owner to update the parking and circulation study for the Center whenever a change tenancy, or a change in the mix of uses is proposed. These requirements will ensure sufficient parking is available on the site for current and future tenants and uses.

6. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and integrate it with the existing and planned uses in the vicinity.

As described in Finding No. 5 above, surrounding uses include residential, commercial, retail and service uses. The Project Site is 9.6-acres and improved with commercial buildings totaling 101,413 square feet. The Project Site is also improved with required landscaping around the perimeter and in interior areas of the site. The Project Site is typical of other commercial shopping centers in Laguna Hills in terms of the nature of the improvements provided that result in a functioning commercial property.

If the Community Development Director determines insufficient parking exists on a site being considered for new tenants and uses due to the application of the City’s standard parking ratios, the City’s shared parking regulations contained in LHMC 9-44.070 allow property owners to base parking need on actual demand with the completion of a parking study to determine if a parking surplus exists on the property. The Applicant has submitted a parking study (“Study”) in order to evaluate the actual parking demand for the Project Site. When factoring in the proposed site improvements and including a 10% buffer for the Project Site, there is a total parking demand of 438 stalls, resulting in a surplus of 62 parking stalls for the Project Site. Therefore, existing and proposed improvements are sufficient to serve the Project Site. Off-site uses in the vicinity will not be impacted by the proposed shared parking approach since the Project Site will maintain all of the improvements required to function. There are no uses proposed that would need to interface with the site. The existing and proposed uses are typical to those found

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 8 ends

1746691.1
in other shopping centers in Laguna Hills and do not require any unique or unusual site improvements to operate. Condition of Approval No. 16 will allow the Community Development Director to evaluate the available parking supply for any change in tenants or change in use at the Center in the future, to ensure the Applicant’s implementation of a shared parking approach will not result in inadequate parking now or in the future.

7. All required development standards prescribed by the Development Code can be achieved.

The proposed joint parking use permit will enable the property owner to determine required parking on the Center’s actual parking demand, and enable the property owner to accommodate a wider range of potential new tenants, broadening the range of services to serve the public, that may require more parking such as health clubs, medical offices, and restaurants. The Applicant, in cooperation with the property owner, has submitted a parking study (“Study”) in order to evaluate the actual parking demand for the Project Site. When factoring in the proposed site improvements and including a 10% buffer for the Project Site, there is a total parking demand of 438 stalls, resulting in a surplus of 62 parking stalls for the Project Site. This approach to determining parking needs on a property is authorized by LHMC 9-44.070. Therefore, the Applicant has demonstrated that it can comply with the City’s parking requirements. Condition or Approval No. 16 will allow the Community Development Director to evaluate the available parking supply for any change in tenancy or mix of uses at the Center in the future to ensure the shared parking approach will comply with the requirements of LHMC 9-

44.070 in the future.

8. The conditions and limitations placed upon the use are necessary to ensure compatibility with adjacent or abutting uses and the preservation of the public peace, safety, and welfare.

The conditions of approval will ensure that the approval of the Joint Parking Use Permit will not result in the conditions described above. Condition of Approval No. 16 will allow the Community Development Director to evaluate the available parking supply for any change in tenant mix at the Center and ensure the adequate parking will be available for all uses at the Center. The ability to evaluate the Center’s required parking for any change in mix of uses, and require reasonable mitigation measures based on future updates to the Center’s parking study to be implemented by the Applicant will ensure that incompatible conditions with adjacent or abutting uses will not materialize as a result of the approval of a Joint Parking Use Permit, and ensure that the public peace, safety and welfare is maintained.

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings, the Planning Agency of the City of Laguna Hills does hereby approve Site Development Permit/Tentative Parcel Map/Parking Use Permit No. USE-0105-2022, subject to the following conditions of approval:

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 9 ends

1746691.1
General

1. The following Conditions of Approval shall be binding and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the term “Applicant” shall mean and refer to, each of the following: The Project Applicant, Bret Bernard, Director of Planning and Development, Milan Capital Management, on behalf of Laguna Hills Plaza, LLC, the owner(s) and tenant(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns.

2. Unless the context dictates otherwise, whenever the term “this Permit” is used in the following Conditions of Approval, it shall collectively refer to the Site Development Permit/Tentative Parcel Map/Parking Use Permit No. USE-0105- 2022 approved pursuant to this Resolution, as well as the plans, studies, and exhibits submitted to the City by the Applicant to describe and depict the improvements to be constructed as a part of the Project, and as otherwise modified by these Conditions of Approval.

3. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and officials, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, consultants, attorneys, boards, commissions, and committees, and instrumentalities thereof ("Indemnitees"), from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, fines, demands, penalties, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and any other claims or actions or proceedings of any kind whatsoever (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures), judgments, orders and decisions (collectively "Claims" and “Actions”), brought against the Indemnitees, which seek to attack, challenge, modify, set aside, void, or annul any action of or any permit or approval issued by the Indemnitees (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for, in connection with, or concerning the approval of this Permit. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the defense of the Indemnitees for the Claims and Actions, and that the Applicant shall promptly reimburse the City for all costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense, including reasonable attorneys' fees. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claims and Actions brought against the Indemnitees and shall cooperate in the defense of any such Claims and Actions. If the Applicant fails to so defend the Claims and Actions, the City shall have the right but not the obligation to do so and, if it does, the Applicant shall promptly pay the City's full cost thereof.

4. Approval of this Permit constitutes approval of the proposed Project only to the extent that it complies with the City’s Development Code and any other applicable zoning regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the Project regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 10 ends

1746691.1

5. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions of approval shall constitute grounds for revocation of this Permit by the Laguna Hills Planning Agency.

6. The Applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval within 30 days of the Planning Agency’s approval.

7. The Conditions of Approval set forth herein include certain development impact fees and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code §66020(d), these conditions constitute written notice of the amount of such fees, and/or exactions. The Applicant is hereby notified that the 90-day protest period in which the Applicant may protest the fees, dedications, reservation, or exactions imposed on this Project through the Conditions of Approval, commencing from the date of approval of the Project, has begun.

8. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2017-07-11-2, the Applicant shall reimburse the City for any outstanding staff time spent on the processing of this Permit within 60 days of the Planning Agency’s approval.

9. This Permit shall expire and be of no further force or effect if the Permit is not implemented within two years from January 24, 2023.

Planning Division

10.Prior to the commencement of any work, the Applicant shall provide a contact number to the Community Development Director for the public to call concerning dust, noise, or other construction-related impacts. The information shall also be posted on site in a manner approved by the Community Development Director.

11.The Applicant shall maintain the Project in compliance with the noise standards of the City of Laguna Hills Noise Ordinance (LHMC 5-24). Should the City receive complaints related to noise associated with the Project which are in violation of the Noise Ordinance, the Applicant agrees to promptly implement reasonable noise attenuation measures.

12.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Community Development Director for review and approval. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with Laguna Hills Municipal Code Chapter 9-46 and 9-47, including sufficient wall screening, landscaping, planter size and shade trees along the site perimeter and within the Project parking lot, installation of “Smart” landscape irrigation controllers, low precipitation-rate sprinkler heads, and water efficient landscaping, as applicable.

13.The Applicant shall deposit with the Community Development Department the estimated reasonable cost necessary to retain a qualified landscape professional to review the Applicant’s proposed landscape and irrigation plans, as well as inspect the Applicant-installed landscaping to ensure compliance

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 11 ends

1746691.1
with the approved landscaped plans. The amount deposited shall be in accordance with a written proposal obtained by the City pursuant to its Purchasing Ordinance. Prior to the issuance of building shell final or issuance of a Certificate of Use or Occupancy permit, the Applicant shall pay the actual cost of landscape plan check and inspection or be entitled to a refund of funds deposited, if any. All required landscaping shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy.

14.The Center shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by the provision of regular removal of trash and debris, and comply with all property maintenance standards as required by LHMC Chapter 9-74. Specifically, all business shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by the provision of regular removal of trash and debris, and all business activities and related services shall be conducted entirely within the tenant space.

15.Deliveries are prohibited between the hours of 10:00pm and 7:00am. Delivered materials shall be promptly stored within the tenant space. No equipment or materials shall be permitted to remain outdoors at any time unless contained within an approved enclosure.

16.If at any time in the future the Community Development Director determines, in his or her sole discretion, that an updated parking and circulation study is necessary to address parking and/or circulation insufficiencies, issues, complaints, or problems relative to ensuring adequate parking and circulation on the subject property in connection with this Permit, the Applicant shall, at its sole cost and expense, be responsible for the cost of a parking and circulation study prepared by a licensed consultant selected by the City. The Applicant shall, at its sole cost and expense, be responsible for implementation of any reasonable mitigation measures deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director related to such impacts based on the findings of such study.

17.The colored ‘accent bands’ identified on the cornice of Building B shall be painted to match or complement the approved building color palette, with nonprimary colors only. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Use and Occupancy for the tenant space, the color of the cornice shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director.

18.Prior to final building inspection and/or issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit a Master Sign Program for the review and approval pursuant to Chapter 9-42 and 9-92 of the Laguna Hills Municipal Code.

Tentative Parcel Map

19.A Final Parcel Map shall be recorded within two (2) years of January 24, 2023, unless the Applicant has filed a request for extension consistent with the provisions of City requirements and the California Subdivision Map Act.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 12 ends

1746691.1

20.Prior to or concurrent with recordation of the Final Parcel Map, the Applicant shall record a declaration, covenant, agreement, reciprocal easement agreement, or other instrument, in a form approved by the City Attorney and City Manager, which provides for continued (a) reciprocal pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation between all parcels; (b) reciprocal parking between all parcels; (c) reciprocal easements for common utility facilities serving all parcels; and (d) establishing an association to facilitate management and maintenance of the property. The instrument shall be consistent with the approved tentative parcel map, shall be enforceable by the City, shall run with the land, shall bind all current and future owners and tenants of all or portions of all parcels, shall provide that violation of the terms of the instrument constitute a violation of these conditions of approval, and shall not be modified or terminated without prior written approval from the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld.

21.The Applicant shall prepare a Final Subdivision Map in accordance with City, County, and State requirements and standards. The Applicant shall submit the Final Subdivision Map for plan check to both the City Engineer and County Surveyor and pay all applicable plan check fees to both agencies. The Applicant shall submit a current title report, supporting documents, and traverse closure calculations for plan check. Following recordation of the Final Subdivision Map, the Applicant shall provide the City with a duplicate Mylar of the recorded document.

22.Any map shall be prepared in conformance with the State’s Subdivision Map Act, the County’s map processing manual, and the City’s municipal code, and as determined and approved by the City Engineer, which may require the posting of security instruments guaranteeing the construction of future improvements. The Applicant shall submit a current title report, supporting documents, and traverse closure calculations for plan check. Following recordation of the map, the Applicant shall provide the City with a duplicate Mylar of the recorded document.

23.After the final Parcel Map has been recorded by the County Clerk's Office, the Applicant shall provide the City with a duplicate mylar and scanned TIFF files of all maps.

24.Prior to the commencement of map checking, a deposit shall be posted for map check fees. Map check fees will be based on time and materials to be invoiced at the completion of the map check process. All map check fees shall be paid in full before the map will be sent to City Council for approval.

25.Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Use and Occupancy, all survey monumentation shall be placed by a California Licensed Land Surveyor as required by and shown on the map.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 13 ends

1746691.1
Building Division

26.The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring all applicable building permits are obtained from the City of Laguna Hills prior to commencement of any work for which a permit is required.

27.Any required documents submitted after January 1, 2023 for the purpose of building permit issuance shall be accurately labeled and reflect all work, as required by the 2022 California Building Code.

28.All construction shall comply with the applicable California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, and Green Building Codes with regard to the appropriate occupancies for each permit requested.

29.Plans submitted for this Project for the purpose of obtaining a building permit shall comply with California Disabled Accessibility requirements, as required by Chapter 11 of the 2022 California Building Code.

30.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall include a copy of this Permit (the signed resolution of approval) in the City building plan sets submitted for the purpose of obtaining a building permit.

31.Prior to issuance of building permits, Applicant shall submit approvals from the Orange County Fire Authority or provide verification of plan submittal.

32.During construction, adequate emergency access shall be maintained to the site at all times in accordance with any requirements of the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA).

33.Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Program paperwork, if applicable, as required by Laguna Hills Municipal Code Chapter 5-48, and to comply with mandates of CalRecycle.

Public Works Department

34.Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Use and Occupancy for the Project, the Applicant shall construct roadway improvements to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer to lengthen the existing left-turn pocket from eastbound Alicia Parkway into the Project driveway to provide a queue storage length of 135 feet (the existing approximate length is 105 feet) in order to address the queue storage deficiency in this left-turn pocket as identified in the Project’s traffic and parking study, unless otherwise determined and approved by the City Engineer. A separate encroachment permit and plan check and inspection fees shall apply. All permitting and construction costs shall be at the Applicant’s sole expense.

35.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit or building permit, security instruments shall be posted guaranteeing construction of on-site and off-site

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 14 ends

1746691.1
improvements in accordance with LHMC Section 10-16.300, and these Conditions of Approval. Security instruments shall include a grading bond and a landscape bond, unless the latter is waived by the Community Development Director.

36.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, all required geotechnical testing services required for improvements in the public right-ofway will be based on time and materials, to be invoiced by the City. These fees will be in addition to all applicable encroachment, grading, subdivision, etc. inspection fees. These fees must be paid in full prior to release of any grading bonds.

37.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit a grading and erosion control plan for any on-site drive aisle, parking space, sidewalk and/or other hardscape improvements. As applicable, the grading plan shall show the construction of all curb and gutter, asphalt and concrete pavement, sidewalk, storm drain, sewer and water systems (for reference only) and other improvements, and must include a horizontal control plan.

38.Prior to release of any grading bonds, the Project must be completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes completion of all punch list items, approved mylar as-builts, underground inspections (for storm drain systems, if any), required paperwork (such as soils reports, certifications, etc.). All associated permits will be considered active, until all items (including paperwork) have been completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. All permits must be current (not expired) at time of bond release.

The Applicant is advised that there may be permit renewal fees if said permits have expired prior to completion of all above listed items.

39.All grading and storm drain plans shall be prepared on City standard ARCH D size sheets by a licensed civil engineer and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. All landscaping plans shall be prepared on City standard ARCH D size sheets by a licensed landscape architect and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. All plans must be in substantial conformance with the approved site/concept plans. Plan check and inspection fees shall be paid by the Applicant in accordance with the City's fee schedule.

40.Prior to the release of any grading bonds, all grading, storm drain, and landscaping plans associated with the Project shall be as-built upon completion of the Project. Once the as-built drawings are approved, the Applicant shall provide the City with a duplicate mylar of the plans and scanned TIFF files of all plans.

41.Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, all on-site improvement construction (parking lots, sidewalks, ramps, grading) shall be bonded for with the precise grading plan and permit.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 15 ends

1746691.1

42.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, erosion control, demolition, and earth moving work shall be bonded for with the rough or precise grading plan and permit, whichever occurs first.

43.Prior to work in the public right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall first be obtained from the City Engineer. The City Engineer at his sole discretion may require the posting of an encroachment permit bond to guarantee the completion of work in the public right-of-way.

44.Perimeter fencing shall be installed that has green screen material or approved equal. The fence/screen material shall be properly maintained and be free of rips, tears, fraying, graffiti, and any other damage or vandalism.

45.Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, a plan for the placement and installation of traffic signing, pavement delineation, and other traffic devices on the subject property shall be prepared for review and approval by the City Engineer. Parking stalls shall be striped according to City engineering standard plans, and stop signs along with stop legend bar shall be provided at all locations as specified by the City Engineer.

46.Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the City of Laguna Hills Grading Code and Manual and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any grading required outside of the Project boundaries will require either slope easements or right-of-entry letters from the adjacent property owners.

47.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following on site (private property) improvements shall be designed in a manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer:
a. All provisions for surface drainage.
b. All necessary storm drain facilities extending to a satisfactory point of disposal for the proper control and disposal of storm runoff.

48.The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Orange County Stormwater Program “Construction Runoff Guidance Manual” during the construction of the Project. The requirements contained in this manual shall be incorporated into the grading plans.

49.All structural pavement sections for on-site and off-site streets, including all newly constructed or reconstructed parking lots, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. The soils engineer shall submit pavement section recommendations based on "R" Value analysis of the subgrade soils and approved City traffic indices. In no event shall the minimum pavement sections be less than the City’s engineering standard plan minimum pavement sections.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 16 ends

1746691.1

50.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the Applicant shall provide a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) report reviewing existing pathways, sidewalks and access ramps for both on-site access and adjacent to the site access along the accessible pathways for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for approval by the City Engineer and the Building Official. Accessible pathways shall not include a path within any drive aisle, except as necessary to cross a drive aisle at 90° to the drive aisle. The CASp report shall include an implementation plan to correct all deficiencies noted and as reasonably approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official.

51.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, any sidewalk or pathway not in compliance with ADA standards and the CASp report, as approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official, shall be reconstructed to the City’s standards.

52.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project plans shall denote that all concrete placed (i.e. sidewalk) that comes in contact with native soils shall contain Type V cement.

53.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, all uplifted, subsided or severely worn curb, gutter and sidewalk that fronts the Project in the public right-of-way shall be removed and replaced. This includes uplifted, subsided or severely worn curb and gutter and sidewalk that was in this condition prior to the start of construction. Limits of removal and replacement will not be marked out until immediately prior to occupancy so that all damage that occurred during construction can be included in the limits of replacement.

54.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, all City street pavement restorations shall be completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer.

55.If any asphalt pavement cuts are made into existing City roadways, the subject roadway shall be ground down and overlaid from the gutter line to the centerline or median of the roadway and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer.

56.During the course of the Project construction, no public streets shall be utilized for temporary storage of any construction materials and no vehicles shall be off-loaded of deliveries or filled with materials on any public street.

57.Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, a haul route plan for all exports/imports from/to the site shall be submitted for review and approval by, and to the reasonable satisfaction of, the City Engineer. The haul route shall not utilize any arterial highway prior to 9:00 am or after 4:00 pm daily. In addition, a construction vehicle routing plan shall be submitted for review and approval by, and to the reasonable satisfaction of, the City Engineer prior to any demolition or construction work. No construction equipment traffic shall

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 17 ends

1746691.1
access or depart the site during morning or evening traffic peak periods, which are 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.

58.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a hydrology and hydraulic study (including off-site areas affecting the development) shall be prepared by a qualified civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer. The report shall include detailed drainage studies indicating how the grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, channels, street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood water retarding, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100-year flood.

59.Prior to the issuance of grading permits or the approval of improvement plans, a recorded drainage acceptance letter for any concentration or increase of drainage runoff to adjacent properties shall be required.

60.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, any storm drains modified by the Project, if any, shall be inspected by the County of Orange Underground Inspection Team (The City will arrange for the inspection). There will be additional fees for this inspection.

61.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, "No Dumping - Drains to Ocean" shall be stenciled directly above any inlets or an approved stencil shall be used to paint this message on inlets.

62.All storm drain systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the County of Orange Local Drainage Manual, Orange County Public Works Standard Plans, and applicable City standard engineering plans.

63.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, evidence that proper clearances have been obtained from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board such as the filing of a Notice of Intent to Discharge, shall be provided to the City Engineer. If a permit is required, the Applicant will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.

64.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, catch basin filters shall be installed on all catch basins which drain the subject site, including any existing catch basins. Specification sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to the installation of the filters.

65.All projects, in conjunction with a grading permit, require the preparation of an erosion control plan in conformance with the City of Laguna Hills Grading and Excavation Code. All erosion control plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices to the maximum extent possible. In addition, erosion control shall be implemented during construction year-round.

66.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall provide for review and approval by the City Engineer a trash and recycling plan detailing the expected trash and recycled material volume produced by the existing Center.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 18 ends

1746691.1
Accordingly, all existing and proposed trash bin enclosures shall be sized to accommodate the required number of trash and recycling bins as required by the plan. At a minimum, any trash bin enclosure shall be built according to the City’s standard engineering plan, which requires a floor drain connected to the sanitary sewer system and a solid roof to prevent rain water intrusion, and shall accommodate one three-yard trash bin and one three-yard recycling bin (approximate dimensions 40” wide x 82” long) and enough room for personnel to access the trash bins. No trash bin shall be located outside an enclosure approved by the Community Development Director. If, at any time in the future it is determined by the Public Works Director that the trash enclosure is inadequate, the property owner at its expense shall expand the trash enclosure to accommodate extra bins as evidenced by operations or shall order more frequent trash and recycling bin pick-ups. All trash, storage of cartons, containers, and other discarded items shall be screened from public view at all times.

67.Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer. The WQMP shall be prepared in conformance with the City’s WQMP Instructions and Template.

The project design and construction shall comply with the requirements of the latest edition of the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Copies of the Permit may be downloaded from the Water Board’s website at www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego. This order and the City’s NPDES Local Implementation Plan (LIP) require the City to classify this Project as a priority project. The Applicant will be responsible for complying with the “priority development project” requirements of this Permit, which requires the Project to incorporate source control BMPs and structural treatment BMPs.

The Applicant is advised that there are additional plan check fees for the review of this document.

68.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, all water runoff from the site (including sheet flow), including existing areas, shall be required to be filtered with a water quality device approved by the City Engineer, prior to the discharge of the water to the street gutter or storm drain system. This may require the installation of trench drains the entire width of the entrances to collect and treat sheet flow leaving the site.

Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, the property owner shall furnish a recorded copy of a Maintenance Agreement outlining post construction Best Management Practices (BMP’s) in accordance with the County of Orange Drainage Area Management Plan Appendix for New Development. The following non-structural BMP’s are required to be implemented by the current property owner, and all subsequent property owners to satisfy National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requirements and requirements outlined in the Orange County Drainage Area

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 19 ends

1746691.1
Management Plan. A copy of these conditions of approval shall be provided to all subsequent property owners. The following BMP’s will be required:
a. Storage and Repair of Motor Vehicles – The property owner shall not allow motor vehicles stored on the premises to be washed on site, unless a car wash facility is proposed that is connected to the sanitary sewer system.

Motor vehicles may be lightly rinsed (with no detergents, soaps, or surfactants) provided that de-ionized water is used sparingly and any runoff is diverted to a landscaped area or collected on-site and disposed of into the sanitary sewer system. Vehicles parked at this facility that show evidence of leaking fluids must be stored with drip pans located to catch the leakage and protected from mixing with stormwater. All hazardous pollutants spilled from stored vehicles shall be cleaned and picked up immediately with an appropriate “dry method” absorbent material and disposed of properly. All spills must be contained and cleaned up on the premises.
b. Litter Control – The property owner will be required to implement trash management and litter control procedures in the common areas aimed at reducing pollution of drainage water. The property owner may contract with their landscape maintenance firm to provide this service with the regularly scheduled maintenance, which should consist of litter patrol, emptying of trash receptacles in common areas, and noting trash disposal violations and reporting the violations to the property owner for investigation. c. Trash Enclosures and Dumpsters – The property owner shall post signs on trash enclosure gates that state “Keep Dumpster Lids Closed.” The property owner will monitor dumpster usage such that dumpsters are not overfilled and the dumpster lids can close completely. The property owner shall increase the trash pickup schedule as necessary to prevent dumpsters from overfilling.
d. Landscape Maintenance – Ongoing maintenance must be consistent with the City’s adopted water conservation ordinance, plus fertilizer and pesticide usage consistent with the “County Management Guidelines for Use and Fertilizers and Pesticides.” Landscaping irrigation systems shall be adjusted and properly maintained to prevent over spray runoffs. e. Green Waste Disposal – Green waste shall not be blown or swept into, or disposed of, in the street, gutter, public right-of-way, or storm drain catch basins or inlets. Leaf blowers, if used, shall be used to move green waste into piles so they can be swept and picked up and disposed of in green waste recycling containers.
f. Employee Training – The property owner shall prepare a training manual(s) for existing and future employees. The manual should include information on non-point source pollution and how to use proper Best Management

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 20 ends

1746691.1
Practices (BMPs) to minimize runoff pollutants. Training shall be provided upon hire and at regular intervals thereafter.
g. Catch Basin/Inlet Inspection – The property owner must inspect all catch basins/inlets on site and clean the catch basins, if necessary, prior to the storm season (no later than October 15 each year).
h. Lot/Street Sweeping – The property owner must sweep outdoor lots regularly (minimum monthly), and prior to the storm season (no later than October 15 each year). Sweeping shall be done with a vacuum-type sweeper. Under no circumstances are outdoor areas/lots to be rinsed or washed with water unless said rinse/wash water is collected and disposed of properly (i.e. into the sewer).
i. Catch Basin Stenciling – All catch basins/inlets/outlets on site must be marked using the City’s “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean” curb marker or stenciled using an approved stencil shall be used to paint this message on the top of curb directly above the inlet, and on one side of the curb face.

Labeling for catch basins is to be inspected regularly and maintained so as to be reasonably legible at all times. The inspection and maintenance is to be performed by the property owner. This stencil is to alert the public/employees to the destination of pollutants discharged into the storm water.
j. BMP Maintenance – The property owner shall be responsible for implementation of each non-structural BMP and regularly scheduled cleaning of all BMP structural facilities (catch basin, storm drains, trash enclosures, etc.).
k. Title 22 CCR Compliance – The property owner must comply with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations and relevant sections of the California Health and Safety Code regarding hazardous waste management, which will be enforced by County Environmental Health on behalf of the State. l. Haz-Mat Disclosure Compliance – The property owner shall comply with County and City ordinances.
m. Uniform Fire Code Implementation – The property owner shall comply with Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code.
n. Spill Response Plan/Kit – The property owner shall develop a spill response plan and maintain a spill response kit on site. Employees shall be properly trained to use the spill response kit. Owner shall maintain absorbent materials in the spill response kit to adequately contain any spills that can be anticipated (i.e. oil drips, engine coolant, etc.).

69.Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, the Applicant shall provide plans and supporting documentation for the review and approval of the City Engineer showing that areas requiring regular washing/cleaning (including

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 21 ends

1746691.1
dumpster areas) are isolated from the storm drain system. No discharge from such areas shall be allowed into the storm drains. This plan may be incorporated into the WQMP.

70.Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, the design plans shall include a solid roof over any proposed loading dock(s) and any drains within the proposed loading dock(s) shall be connected to the sanitary sewer system as required by the City’s Best Management Practices (BMP) Design Manual dated August 31, 2019, and approved by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region.

71.Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, water and sewer improvement plans shall be approved by the appropriate water district and the City Engineer.

All water and sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the appropriate agency's specifications, with all incidental fees paid by the Applicant. These facilities shall be dedicated to the appropriate water district by the Applicant to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer.

72.On-site water and sewer facilities that will not be maintained by Moulton-Niguel Water District shall be plan checked and inspected by the City’s Building Department. All fees shall be paid in accordance with the City's fee schedule.

73.Any above ground valve assemblies or back-flow devices shall be placed on private property and an easement dedicated to Moulton-Niguel Water District.

74.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy, any damage, either structural or aesthetic, to any public and/or private streets as a result of utility connections to service the Project shall be repaired by the Applicant to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. The improvements will not be accepted by the City until the necessary repairs are completed.

75.Any above ground utility cabinets shall be placed on private property and an easement dedicated to the appropriate utility company (if required).

76.No above ground utility structures, cabinets, pipes, or valves shall be constructed within the public right-of-way.

77.The maintenance of any landscaping between the curb and the right-of-way line of any street abutting the parcel shall be the responsibility of the owner of that parcel, unless a recognized association or district has assumed responsibility for said maintenance.

78.All landscape plans shall reflect all improvements shown on the final approved grading plans and building plans including, but not limited to, improvements such as ramps, walkways, driveways, planter areas, fire access lanes, ingress and egress to buildings, and appurtenances constructed to support the use of any improvements such as gates, handrails, fences, or walls.

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X

Page 22 ends

1746691.1
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January, 2023. ________________________________

JANINE HEFT, CHAIR
ATTEST:
______________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS )
I, Jennifer Lee, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Hills, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. PA2023-01-24-X adopted by the Planning Agency of the City of Laguna Hills, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 24 th day of January 2023, by the
following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________________

JENNIFER LEE, CITY CLERK

5.5.1.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Attachment A – Proposed Resolution of Approval (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Remove Existing Building A
Remove Existing Pad Building
Remodel Existing Building B
Entry Canopy
Not In Scope. Existing Bank
Building
Not In Scope. Existing
Restaurant
Existing In Line Shops: Replace the
Existing Clay Tile Roof to Tie Into the
Shopping Centers New Design
Proposed Grocery Store
Proposed 90 Degree Parking
Proposed Canopy Remodel and Facade Upgrade
Not In Scope. Existing
Restaurant
Proposed Pad Building
Not In Scope. Existing
Bank Building
Proposed Restaurant/Shops
Proposed Canopy
Remodel and
Facade Upgrade
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
12" = 1'-0"

COVER SHEET
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
00 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434

PARCEL INFORMATION
ADDRESS: 24901 ALICIA PKWY, LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653
A.P.N.: 620-011-89
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

PARCEL A:

PARCEL 1 IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 17 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. EXCEPT 50 PERCENT OF ALL RIGHTS

TO OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON AND MINERAL SUBSTANCES LYING UNDER OR THAT MAY BE PRODUCED FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND, TOGETHER WITH 50 PERCENT OF ALL RIGHTS TO THE PROCEEDS THEREFROM AND 50 PERCENT OF ALL RENTS, BONUSES AND PROFITS ACCRUING THERETO;

PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT GRANTOR WAIVES AND RELINQUISHES THE RIGHT TO USE OF OCCUPANCY

OR TO ENTER UPON ANY PORTION OF THE SURFACE AND LAND, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DRILLING FOR,

CAPTURING, PRODUCING, EXTRACTING, STORING, TREATING OR OTHERWISE HANDLING OR UTILIZING

SUCH OIL, GAS OR OTHER HYDROCARBON MINERAL SUBSTANCES OR FOR THE PURPOSE OF

EXERCISING GRANTOR'S RIGHT THERETO, AS RESERVED IN DEEDS FROM FIRST WESTERN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR TO FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN SANTA ANA TO JERRETT WILSON DUNLAP, A MARRIED MAN, RECORDED JULY 18, 1967 IN BOOK 8314, PAGE 98 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND J.L BROWNING, AN UNMARRIED MAN, RECORDED JULY 18, 1967 IN BOOK 8314, PAGE 104 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

SAID LAND IS SHOWN AS PARCEL 1 ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LL79-13 ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LL79-13 RECORDED MAY 17, 1979 IN BOOK 13149, PAGE 1020 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PARCEL B:

AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP, IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 17 OF

PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTRY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTRY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 75° 19' 07" WEST 45 FEET' THENCE NORTH 77° 36' 40" EAST 50.54 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF ALICIA PARKWAY 120 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT OF BEING DISTANT NORTH 14° 40' 53" EAST 23 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 14° 40' 53" WEST 23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL C:

AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP, IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 17

OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY REORDER OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY KINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 NORTH 14° 40' 53" EAST 25.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF HON AVENUE, 80 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 AND THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF SOUTH 14°40' 53" WEST 75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25°59' 29" EAST 76.49 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF HON AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 75° 19' 07" EAST 15 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 75° 19' 07" WEST 15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

B
SITE
A
l
i
c
i
a
P
r
k
wy
.

I-5
I-5
Hon Ave.

Costeau St.

Costeau
St.

A
l
i
c
i
a
P
r
k
wy
.

North
C AB
D
SHEET # SHEET NAME
00 COVER SHEET
01 PROJECT COMPARISON
02 EXISTING SITE PLAN
03 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
04 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
05 PHASING PLAN
06 SITE PHOTOMETRIC
07 SITE TRUCK TURN
08 MATERIAL BOARD
09 BUILDING A PERSPECTIVE
10 BUILDING A ELEVATIONS
11 BUILDING A PLANS
12 BUILDING B PERSPECTIVE
13 BUILDING B ELEVATIONS
14 BUILDING B & C PLANS
15 BUILDING D PERSPECTIVE
16 BUILDING D PLANS
17 PAD BUILDING PERSPECTIVE
18 PAD BUILDING ELEVATIONS
19 SITE SECTION
20 SITE VIEWS
21 SITE PHOTO MAP
22 SITE PHOTO
23 SITE PHOTO
24 SITE PHOTO
25 ADJACENT SITE PHOTO
26 ADJACENT SITE PHOTO
27 ADJACENT SITE PHOTO
28 ADJACENT SITE PHOTO
29 ALTA SITE PLAN
30 TEANATIVE PARCEL MAP
31 FIRE ACCESS PLAN
32 PRELIMINARY GRADING
33 PRELIMINARY GRADING
34 PRELIMINARY GRADING
35 PRELIMINARY GRADING
36 PRELIMINARY GRADING
37 PRELIMINARY GRADING
38 PRELIMINARY GRADING
39 PRELIMINARY GRADING
1 Scale: 12" = 1'
-0"

EXISTING
2 Scale: 12" = 1'
-0"

PROPOSED

SITE INFORMATION
NET SITE AREA:..............

SITE DEDICATION: NO SITE DEDICATION
PLANING AND ZONING:

EXISTING LAND USE ZONE: NMU – NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE
PROPOSE LAND USE ZONE: NMU – NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE
EXISTING BUILDING AREA: 106,285 SF
PROPOSE BUILDING AREA:

Proposed Bldg A-1: (42,709 SF)
Proposed Bldg A-2: (4,366 SF)
Existing Building B: (25,532 SF)
Existing Building C: (6,843 SF)
Existing Building D: (15,966 SF)
Existing Bldg Pad A: (2,497 SF)
Proposed Bldg Pad B: (3,500 SF)
PROPSED LOT COVERAGE:

ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE: 50% (NMU)
GROSS BUILDING AREA ALL FLOORS:

PROPOSED FLOOR AREA RATIO:

ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE: 0.38 to 1pu (NMU)
PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT............39'-0"
ALLOWABLE BLDG. HEIGHT (NMU).. 40'-0"
EXISTING PARKING:..............516 Spaces
EXSITING PARKING RATIO: 4.85 per 1,000 SF
PROPOSED PARKING:...........500 Spaces
PROPOSED PARKING RATIO: 4.93 per 1,000 SF

24.1%
101,413 SF

0.24 to 1
(420,238 SF 9.65 acres )
101,413 SF
A

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) FSVTVT

PROPERTY LINE PER CIVIL

PROPERTY LINE PER CIVIL
EXISTING BUILDING A-1

TO BE DEMOLISHED

EXISTING BUILDING B

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE EXISTING BUILDING B TO REMAIN NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS BUILDING D TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING PAD A

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE
EXISTING ATM TO BE RELOCATED.

NOT IN
SCOPE

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

EXISTING PAD

BUILDING

TO BE DEMOLISHED

ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL

EXISTING PATIO
NOT IN
SCOPE

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

EXISTING BUILDING B

PROPOSED CANOPY AND

FACADE REMODEL
EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS BLDG. D TO REMAIN

PROPOSED ROOF AND FACADE REMODEL

EXISTING PAD A

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-1 EXISTING BLDG. C PROPOSED ROOF AND FACADE

REMODEL

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-2
ATM

PROPOSED
PAD

BUILDING

COMPACTOR LOADING

ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL

ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1" = 60'-0"

PROJECT COMPARISON
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
01 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
TOTAL LAND AREA:....................

GROUND LEVEL BLDG. AREA:...

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE:....

LAND TO BLDG. RATIO:..............

TOTAL BUILDING AREA:.............

PROPOSED F.A.R.:.....................

PARKING REQUIRED:.................

PARKING PROVIDED:.................

PARKING RATIO:.........................

25.3%

2.95 to 1

0.25 to 1

4.86 Per 1,000 SF
420,238 SFSF

9.65 acresACRE
106,285 SF
106,276 SF
577 Spaces
516 Spaces

EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER
EXISTING ACCESSIBLE 16 Spaces
EXISTING VAN ACCESSIBLE 3 Spaces
EXISTING STANDARD PARKING 499 Spaces
TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 518

EXISTING MAJOR BLDG TO BE DEMOLISHED
M-A1 TENANT A1 45,013 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 225 Spaces M-A1 TENANT A1

WAREHOUSE
3,792 SF RETAIL - STORAGE
& SHIPPING
1 Space per 1,500 SF 3 Spaces
48,805 SF 228

EXISTING PAD BLDG TO BE DEMOLISHED
SH-A Diversified Medical
Equip.
1,860 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 9 Spaces
SH-B Verona Kitcen &
Bath
3,275 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 16 Spaces
SH-C AV Medical 1,507 SF MEDICAL / DENTAL
OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 10 Spaces
6,642 SF 35

EXISTING MAJOR B
M-B TENANT B 21,741 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 109 Parking Spaces

M-B TENANT B

WAREHOUSE
3,791 SF RETAIL - STORAGE
& SHIPPING
1 Space per 1,500 SF 3 Parking
Spaces
25,532 SF 112

EXISTING SHOPS BLDG C
M-C1 TENANT C 1,967 SF VETERINARIAN 1 Space per 200 SF 10 Parking Spaces
M-C2 TENANT D 4,867 SF RESTAURANT
>4,000 SF
40 stalls, plus 1 stall/50
SF above 4,000 SF
57 Parking
Spaces
6,834 SF 67
EXISTING SHOPS BLDG. D
SH-A Little Caesar 1,505 SF RESTAURANT -

TAKE OUT
1 Space per 250 SF 6 Spaces
SH-B Squared Spa
Massage
1,493 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 15 Spaces
SH-C Prosperity Thai 1,255 SF RESTAURANT -

TAKE OUT
1 Space per 250 SF 5 Spaces
SH-D Maw N Paw Kettle
Corn
1,262 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 6 Spaces
SH-E UPS Store 1,257 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 6 Spaces SH-F Z-Nails 626 SF BEAUTY / NAILS
SALON
3 Spaces per Beautician
Chair
0 Spaces
SH-G LDC Dental Center 1,893 SF MEDICAL / DENTAL
OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 13 Spaces
SH-I1 Martial Arts 1,263 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 13 Spaces
SH-I2 KUMON 1,200 SF BUSINESS / OFFICE 1 Space per 300 SF 4 Spaces SH-J MVP Sportscard 866 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 4 Spaces SH-K EZ Tech Wireless 955 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 5 Spaces SH-L Vision Crafters 595 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 3 Spaces SH-M La Mirage Hair 998 SF BEAUTY / NAILS
SALON
3 Spaces per Beautician
Chair
0 Spaces
SH-N Daniels Acupunture 798 SF MEDICAL / DENTAL
OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 5 Spaces
15,966 SF 85

EXISTNG PAD A
P-A CARLS JR 2,497 SF FAST FOOD 1 Space per 50 SF 50 Spaces 2,497 SF 50
106,276 SF 577

EXISTING PARKING
North
TOTAL LAND AREA:....................

GROUND LEVEL BLDG. AREA:...

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE:....

LAND TO BLDG. RATIO:..............

TOTAL BUILDING AREA:.............

PROPOSED F.A.R.:.....................

PARKING REQUIRED:.................

PARKING PROVIDED:.................

PARKING RATIO:.........................

24.1%

3.16 to 1

0.24 to 1

4.94 Per 1,000 SF
420,238 SFSF

9.65 acresACRE
101,128 SF
101,128 SF
616 Spaces
500 Spaces

PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER
PROPOSED BLDG. A1
M-A1 TENANT A 42,435 SF GROCERY 1 Space per 200 SF 212 Spaces 42,435 SF 212
PROPOSED MAJOR A-2
M-A2.1 TENANT 1,682 SF RESTAURANT
<4,000 SF
1 Space per 100 SF 17 Spaces
M-A2.1 OPEN AIR PATIO 500 SF RESTAURANT
<4,000 SF
1 Space per 100 SF 5 Spaces
M-A2.2 TENANT 1,682 SF RESTAURANT
<4,000 SF
1 Space per 100 SF 17 Spaces
M-A2.2 OPEN AIR PATIO 500 SF RESTAURANT
<4,000 SF
1 Space per 100 SF 5 Spaces
4,364 SF 44

PROPOSED PAD BUILDING
PB-1 Area 1,750 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 9 Spaces
PB-2 Area 1,750 SF FAST FOOD 1 Space per 50 SF 35 Spaces 3,500 SF 44

EXISTING MAJOR B
M-B TENANT B 21,741 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 109 Parking Spaces

M-B TENANT B

WAREHOUSE
3,791 SF RETAIL -

STORAGE &

SHIPPING
1 Space per 1,500 SF 3 Parking
Spaces
25,532 SF 112

TAKE OUT
1 Space per 250 SF 6 Spaces
SH-B Squared Spa
Massage
1,493 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 15 Spaces
SH-C Prosperity Thai 1,255 SF RESTAURANT -

DENTAL OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 13 Spaces
SH-I1 Martial Arts 1,263 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 13 Spaces
SH-I2 KUMON 1,200 SF BUSINESS /
OFFICE
1 Space per 300 SF 4 Spaces
SH-J MVP Sportscard 866 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 4 Spaces SH-K EZ Tech Wireless 955 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 5 Spaces SH-L Vision Crafters 595 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 3 Spaces SH-M La Mirage Hair 998 SF BEAUTY / NAILS
SALON
3 Spaces per Beautician
Chair
0 Spaces
SH-N Daniels Acupunture 798 SF MEDICAL /

DENTAL OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 5 Spaces
15,966 SF 85

EXISTNG PAD A
P-A CARLS JR 2,497 SF FAST FOOD 1 Space per 50 SF 50 Spaces 2,497 SF 50
101,128 SF 614
ACCESSIBLE - EVSE 2 Spaces
AMBULATORY - EVSE 1 Spaces
EVCS 1 Spaces
EVSE 45 Spaces
VAN ACCESSIBLE - EVCS 1 Spaces
50 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING 10 Spaces
10 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 11 Spaces
ACCESSIBLE PARKING EXSITING 4 Spaces
VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 Spaces
VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING EXISTING 2 Spaces
20 STANDARD PARKING 361 Spaces
STANDARD PARKING EXISTING 36 Spaces
STANDARD PARKING RE-PAINT EXISTING 23 Spaces
420
500

PROPSED PARKING
PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON LAGUNA HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9-44. SEE PARKING STUDY FOR LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA OPTION 1-B FOR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS.

PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON LAGUNA HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9-44. SEE PARKING STUDY FOR LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA OPTION 1-B FOR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS.

ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR AREAS
• Bank of America ATM Pedestal: +/- 300 SF
• Shop Building C Exterior Patio: +/- 600 SF

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) 6' HIGH WOODEN FENCE 0.60' NE'LY
6' HIGH WOODEN FENCE 1.10' NE'LY
POOL
POOL
POOL
POOL
POOL
POOL
EL EL
EL EL
ATM

TEL TEL
FP
ASPH
E
E
E
TC BC

BEG MON SIGN
.
239
383
15 378.11
377.71
.

WV
D
D
D

VTFS VT

PROPERTY LINE PER CIVIL

PROPERTY LINE PER CIVIL
EXISTING BUILDING A-1

TO BE DEMOLISHED

EXISTING BUILDING B

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING BUILDING

B TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE DEMOLISHED, RE-GRADED, AND
RE-CONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE 90 DEGREE PARKING

EXISTING DRIVEWAY

TO REMAIN

EXISTING DRIVEWAY

TO REMAIN

EXISTING DRIVEWAY

TO REMAIN

EXISTING DRIVEWAY

TO REMAIN

EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS BUILDING D TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING PAD A

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE
TO BE DEMOLISHED. EXISTING

RETAINING WALL TO BE

RECONFIGURED TO

ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED
LOADING DOCK. EXISTING

EUCALYPTUS TREES THAT ARE

REMOVED TO COMPLETE THIS

WORK WILL BE REPLACED WITH

CANOPY TREES ALONG THE
EXISTING LANDSCAPE HILL.

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO

BE DEMOLISHED

EXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE

DEMOLISHED & RECONFIGURED TO

ACCOMMODATE DELIVERY TRUCK
ACCESS
EXISTING ATM TO BE RELOCATED.

EXISTING EXTERIOR PATIO TO REMAIN

EXISTING DRIVE AISLE AND

PARKING TO REMAIN
NOT IN
SCOPE

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

EXISTING LANDSCAPING

TO BE UPDATED

EXISTING

LANDSCAPING AND

IRRIGATION TO BE

UPGRADED

EXISTING DRIVE AISLE AND PARKING TO REMAIN

EXISTING PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLE S AREA TO BE RECONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE 90 DEGREE PARKING & DELIVERY TRUCK ACCESS
52 EXISTING STANDARD

PARKING SPACES

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN

EXISTING PARKING LOT

AND DRIVE AISLE TO BE

RE-STRIPED

EXISTING DEPRESSED

LOADING DOCK

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING DRIVE AISLE

NOT IN SCOPE PROTECT IN

PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION

EXISTING DRIVE AISLE

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLE TO BE RE-PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING CONFIGURATION

PROPOSED CANOPY REMODEL

EXISTING PAD

BUILDING

TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE DEMOLISHED, REGRADED, AND RE-CONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE

FUTURE PAD BUILDING

EXISTING LANDSCAPING

TO BE UPDATED

EXISTING LANDSCAPING

TO BE UPDATED

EXISTING AT GRADE LOADING DOCK TO BE

RECONFIGURED TO DEPRESSED LOADING DOCK

EXISTING PARKING TO

BE REMOVED

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO

BE DEMOLISHED
SH-N
798 SFSH-M998 SF
SH-L
595 SF
SH-K
955 SF
SH-J
866 SFSH-I2
1,200 SF
SH-I1
1,263 SF
SH-G
1,893 SF
SH-F
626 SF
SH-E
1,257 SF
SH-D
1,262 SF
SH-C
1,255 SF
SH-B
1,493 SF
SH-A
1,505 SF
SH-A
1,860 SF
SH-B
3,275 SF
SH-C
1,507 SF
M-C1
1,967 SF
M-C2
4,867 SF
M-B
21,741 SF
M-B
3,791 SF
P-A
2,497 SF

EXISTING

PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN

ACCESS TO BE

REMOVED

EXISTING

PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

EXISTING

PEDESTRIAN

ACCESS TO ATM

EXSITING

DRIVEWAY ACCESS
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1/32" = 1'-0"

EXISTING SITE PLAN
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
02 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
TOTAL LAND AREA:....................

GROUND LEVEL BLDG. AREA:...

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE:....

LAND TO BLDG. RATIO:..............

TOTAL BUILDING AREA:.............

PROPOSED F.A.R.:.....................

PARKING REQUIRED:.................

PARKING PROVIDED:.................

PARKING RATIO:.........................

REQ. PARKING REDUCTION:.....

25.3%

2.95 to 1

0.25 to 1

4.85 Per 1,000 SF

10.57%
420,238 SFSF

9.65 acresACRE
106,285 SF
106,285 SF
577 Spaces
516 Spaces

EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER
EXISTING ACCESSIBLE 16 Spaces
EXISTING VAN ACCESSIBLE 3 Spaces
EXISTING STANDARD PARKING 499 Spaces
TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 518

EXISTING MAJOR BLDG TO BE DEMOLISHED
M-A1 TENANT A1 45,013 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 225 Spaces M-A1 TENANT A1

WAREHOUSE
3,792 SF RETAIL - STORAGE
& SHIPPING
1 Space per 1,500 SF 3 Spaces
48,805 SF 228

EXISTING MAJOR B
M-B TENANT B 21,741 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 109 Parking Spaces

M-B TENANT B

WAREHOUSE
3,791 SF RETAIL - STORAGE
& SHIPPING
1 Space per 1,500 SF 3 Parking
Spaces
25,532 SF 112

TAKE OUT
1 Space per 250 SF 6 Spaces
SH-B Squared Spa
Massage
1,493 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 15 Spaces
SH-C Prosperity Thai 1,255 SF RESTAURANT -

EXISTNG PAD A
P-A CARLS JR 2,497 SF FAST FOOD 1 Space per 50 SF 50 Spaces 2,497 SF 50
106,276 SF 577

REQUIRED PARKING

EXISTING PARKING
North
PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON LAGUNA HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9-44. SEE PARKING STUDY FOR LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA OPTION 1-B FOR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS.

ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR AREAS
• Bank of America ATM Pedestal: +/- 300 SF
• Shop Building C Exterior Patio: +/- 600 SF 5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) NOT IN
SCOPE

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

EXISTING BUILDING B TO REMAIN

PROPOSED CANOPY AND

FACADE REMODEL
EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS BLDG. D TO REMAIN

PROPOSED ROOF AND FACADE REMODEL

EXISTING PAD A

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED BUILDING
A-1
PROPOSED 90 DEGREE PARKING
(9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)

PROPOSED DEPRESSED LOADING DOCK

PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE
& COMPACTOR BAY

EXISTING DEPRESSED

LOADING DOCK

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED EXISTING

RE-STRIPED PARKING
(9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)

EXISTING PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLE TO BE RE-PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING CONFIGURATION EXISTING BLDG. C TO
REMAIN

PROPOSED ROOF AND

FACADE REMODEL

PROPOSED

BUILDING
A-2
P-A
2,497 SF
ATM

PROPOSED

PAD BUILDING
(P) 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTER STRIP
(P) BIKE RACKS (8)
(P) LANDSCAPED PEDESTRIAN WALK
(P) ENHANCED PAVING (TRAFFIC RATED PAVERS)
(P) ENHANCED PAVING
(TRAFFIC RATED PAVERS)
(P) BIKE RACKS (4)
(P) BIKE
LOCKERS (3)

FUTURE EV CHARGING

STATIONS
(P) FUTURE EV

CHARGING

STATIONS
(P) EV CHARGING

STATIONS
(P) 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTER STRIP
(P) 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTER STRIP
(P) OPEN AIR PATIO

EXISTING PATIO

EXISTING ENTRY/EXIT

RESTRIPE EXISTING

ENTRY/EXIT
PROPOSED 6 FOOT TALL CMU SOUND WALL
(P) LOADING DOCK CMU SOUND WALL

EXISTING

MONUMENT SIGN

EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN

EXISTING

MONUMENT SIGN
1 19
1 A1 19
B1
3 19
3 19
D1
(P) TRASH ENCLOSURE
(P) LOADING
R5
20 R5
20 R1
R2
R3
R4
18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0"
PROPOSED 90 DEGREE PARKING
(9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)

COMPACTOR LOADING
AISLE
28'-6"
PROPOSED 90 DEGREE PARKING
(9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)
PROPOSED 90
DEGREE PARKING(9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)

PROPERTY LINE

BUILDING SETBACK
(P) LOADING (P) TRASH ENCLOSURE
AISLE
27'-0"
AIS
L
E
3 0'-0"
18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0"
AIS
L
E
2 4'-0" 18'-0"
18'-0" 18'-0"
AISLE
27'-0"
AISLE
29'-0"
1 0'-0" PARKING

SETBACK
1 5'-0" BLDG

SETBACK

ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL

ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
10'-0" PARKING SETBACK
15'-0" BLDG. SETBACK
PARCEL 3

EXISTING PARKING

NOT INS SCOPE
EXISTING PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLE TO BE REPAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING CONFIGURATION AISLE
30'-0"
42'-0"
52'-9"

PARKING SETBACK
10'-0" B
L
D
G. &
P
A
R
KIN
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
+/- 3
4'-0"
10'-0" BLDG. & PARKING SETBACK
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 3
PARCEL3
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 2
(P) CURB SIDE PICKUP
STALLS (9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)
(P) CURB SIDE PICKUP STALLS
(9'-0" x 18'-0" TYP.)

EXISTING SIDEWALK

EXISTING SIDEWALK
(P) COMPACTOR
AIS
L
E
2 0'-0"

EXISTING

PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO ATM
5'-0"
5'-6"
(P) CART CORAL
9'-0"
6'-0"
6'-0"

EXSITING

DRIVEWAY ACCESS
24'-0" 14'-0"
PARCEL 1 10'-0" B
L
D
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K

SETBACK
10'-0" BLDG
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1/32" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED SITE PLAN
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
03 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
TOTAL LAND AREA:....................

GROUND LEVEL BLDG. AREA:...

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE:....

LAND TO BLDG. RATIO:..............

TOTAL BUILDING AREA:.............

PROPOSED F.A.R.:.....................

PARKING REQUIRED:.................

PARKING PROVIDED:.................

PARKING RATIO:.........................

24.1%

3.16 to 1

0.24 to 1

4.94 Per 1,000 SF
420,238 SFSF

9.65 acresACRE
101,128 SF
101,128 SF
616 Spaces
500 Spaces

PROPOSED PAD BUILDING
PB-1 Area 1,750 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 9 Spaces
PB-2 Area 1,750 SF FAST FOOD 1 Space per 50 SF 35 Spaces 3,500 SF 44

EXISTING MAJOR B
M-B TENANT B 21,741 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 109 Parking Spaces

M-B TENANT B

WAREHOUSE
3,791 SF RETAIL -

STORAGE &

SHIPPING
1 Space per 1,500 SF 3 Parking
Spaces
25,532 SF 112

TAKE OUT
1 Space per 250 SF 6 Spaces
SH-B Squared Spa
Massage
1,493 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 15 Spaces
SH-C Prosperity Thai 1,255 SF RESTAURANT -

DENTAL OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 13 Spaces
SH-I1 Martial Arts 1,263 SF GYM / SPA /

HEALTHCLUB
1 Space per 100 SF 13 Spaces
SH-I2 KUMON 1,200 SF BUSINESS /
OFFICE
1 Space per 300 SF 4 Spaces
SH-J MVP Sportscard 866 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 4 Spaces SH-K EZ Tech Wireless 955 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 5 Spaces SH-L Vision Crafters 595 SF RETAIL 1 Space per 200 SF 3 Spaces SH-M La Mirage Hair 998 SF BEAUTY / NAILS
SALON
3 Spaces per Beautician
Chair
0 Spaces
SH-N Daniels Acupunture 798 SF MEDICAL /

DENTAL OFFICE
1 Space per 150 SF 5 Spaces
15,966 SF 85

REQUIRED PARKING

PROPSED PARKING
North
PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON LAGUNA HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9-44. SEE PARKING STUDY FOR LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA OPTION 1-B FOR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS.

ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR AREAS
• Bank of America ATM Pedestal: +/- 300 SF
• Shop Building C Exterior Patio: +/- 600 SF

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Scale
Job No.

Date

CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
03 ENTITLEMENT
11-23-2022
2020-434
North
47,197 SF, 11.2%) 23,726 SF, 50.3%) 23,471 SF, 49.7%)

PARKING STALL SHADING

THE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING INCLUDES TREES WITH
SHADE CANOPIES INTENDED TO SHADE A MINIMUM OF 40%
OF THE PARKING STALL AREA WITHIN 15 YEARS OF
PLANTING. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MAY

DETERMINE THE SIZE OR NUMBER OF TREES TO BE
INSTALLED SHOULD BE INCREASED.

EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE

RECONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE
PROPOSED LOADING DOCK.

EXISTING EUCALYPTUS TREES THAT

ARE REMOVED TO COMPLETE THIS

WORK WILL BE REPLACED WITH

CANOPY TREES ALONG THE
EXISTING LANDSCAPE HILL.

KMB DESIGN STUDIO
KARI M. BROONER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #5621

MISSION VIEJO, CA
T: 714.488.8096
WWW.KMBDESIGNSTUDIO.COM
04 5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) NOT IN
SCOPE

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

EXISTING BUILDING B

TO REMAIN

PROPOSED CANOPY

AND FACADE

REMODEL
EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS BLDG. D TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING PAD A

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-1

PROPOSED DEPRESSED LOADING DOCK

EXISTING DEPRESSED

LOADING DOCK

NOT IN SCOPE PROPOSED EXISTING

RE-STRIPED PARKING
52 STANDARD PARKING
SPACES

EXISTING PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLE TO BE RE-PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING CONFIGURATION

EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS

BUILDING C TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-2
P-A
2,497 SF
ATM

PROPOSED PAD

BUILDING
5 FOOT WIDE PLANTER STRIP
PROPOSED 90 DEGREE PARKING
BIKE RACKS (4)
BIKE
LOCKERS (3)

EXISTING PATIO

EXISTING ENTRY/EXIT

RESTRIPE EXISTING ENTRY/EXIT

PROPOSED TRASH

ENCLOSURE
CONTINUOUS 6 FOOT TALL CMU SOUND WALL
CONTINUOUS 6 FOOT TALL CMU SOUND WALL

EXISTING

MONUMENT SIGN

EXISTING

MONUMENT SIGN

TRASH ENCLOSURE
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1/32" = 1'-0"

PHASING PLAN
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
05 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
North
• DEMO EXISTING PAD
• DEMO EXSITNG BLDG A-1
• PROPOSED BUILDING A-1
• PROPOSED BUILDING A-2
• SITE GRADING
• SITE PARKING
• SITE LIGHTING
• SITE LANDSCAPE
• SITE SOUND WALL
• SITE RETAINING WALL
• EXISTING BUILDING B CANOPY REMODEL
• EXISTING BUILDING B FACADE REMODEL
• EXISTING BUILDING C & D FACADE REMODEL
• EXISTING BUILDING C & D ROOF REMODEL
• SITE PARKING
• SITE LIGHTING
• SITE LANDSCAPE
• PROPOSED PAD BUILDING
• SITE PARKING
• SITE LIGHTING

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) 144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date

SITE PHOTOMETRIC
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
05 ENTITLEMENT
11-23-2022
2020-434
06 5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) NOT IN
SCOPE

ADJACENT

PROPERTY

EXISTING BUILDING B

TO REMAIN
EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS BLDG. D TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

EXISTING PAD A

TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-1

EXISTING IN LINE SHOPS

BUILDING C TO REMAIN

NOT IN SCOPE

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-2

PROPOSED PAD

BUILDING
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1/32" = 1'-0"

SITE TRUCK TURN
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
07 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
North
WB-67 - Interstate Semi-Trailer
Overall Length 74.000 ft
Overall Width 8.500 ft
Overall Body Height 12.227 ft
Min Body Ground Clearance 1.422 ft
Track Width 8.500 ft
Lock-to-lock Time 6.00 s econds
Curb toCurb Turning Radius 45.000 ft
26 55
45 Max 90° Horiz
Max 10° Vert
4 164
22 5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) MTL-1

IMETCO LATITUDE ALUMINUM

WALL SYSTEMS BOX RIB B

COLOR CHARCOAL
MTL-2

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM
MTL-3

CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
MTL-8

FACTORY FINISH STAINLESS
STEEL.

MTL-9

FACTORY FINISH BLACK
MTL-5

COLOR TO MATCH FIRESTONE

UNA-CLAB METAL CITYSCAPE
MTL-4

COLOR TO MATCH FIRESTONE

UNA-CLAB METAL MATTE BLACK
MTL-13

FIRESTONE METAL PANEL -
CFP-16F. COLOR: DOVE GRAY
MTL-12

FIRESTONE METAL PANEL -
CFP-16F. COLOR: DARK GRAY
MTL-6

KYNAR FINISH COLOR TO

MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ELECTRIC LIME GREEN 6921
MTL-7

KYNAR FINISH COLOR TO

MATCH BONE WHITE
MTL-10

KYNAR FINISH COLOR TO

MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW7069 IRON ORE
CMU-1

INTEGRAL COLOR

BURNISHED CMU BY
OLDCASTLE FINISH 4303
CMU-2

INTEGRAL COLOR

PRECISION CMU BY

OLDCASTLE
PT-5

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAM SW2821 DOWNING
STONE
PT-6

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW 7650 ELLIE GRAY
PT-1

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW7069 IRON ORE
PT-2

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW9173 SHITAKE
PT-3

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW7627 WHITE HERON
PT-4

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW6995

SUPERWHITE
ST-1
BRICK VENEER: BELDEN BRICK

ENGLISH GRAY VELOUR
ST-2
BRICK VENEER: BELDEN BRICK

TITANIUM VELOUR
PT-7

PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW 7653

SILVERPOINTE
MTL-11
LONGBOARD 6” V GROVE
PLANKS COLOR: ULTRA WHITE
ST-3
STONE VENEER: CORONADO STONE -

GETTY STONE EMBASSY BLEND
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
12" = 1'-0"

MATERIAL BOARD
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
08 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) 144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

BUILDING A PERSPECTIVE
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
09 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
A1 Scale: N.T.S.

PROPOSED BUILDING A
A1 Scale: N.T.S.

EXISTING BUILDING A
ABC
D A1

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) MT-4 WD-1
PT-1
PT-3
MT-4

BUILDING BEYOND
MT-3 PT-3
MT-2
+ 36' - 8"
+ 30' - 0"
PT-2
MT-2 PT-3
MT-4 PT-4
MT-9
PT-1
Allowable NMU Heighit + 40' - 0"
METAL AWNING MT-2 BRICK WAINSCOT SMOOTH STUCCO ALUMINUM

STOREFRONT

SMOOTH STUCCO
CART CORAL SCREEN:

PERFORATED METAL PANEL CABLE RAILING

SMOOTH STUCCO

METAL AWNING

ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
BEYOND

WOOD VENEER

SMOOTH STUCCO

ALUMINUM CHANNEL REVEALS
PT-2 ST-1
SMOOTH
STUCCO
SMOOTH
STUCCO
WOOD
VENEER WD-1
WD-1 PT-2 PT-3
MT-6
MT-2
PT-2 PT-3 PT-3 PT-3
MT-2
+ 30' - 0"
+ 15' - 4"
Allowable NMU Heighit + 40' - 0"
PT-3

ALLUMINUM

STOREFRONT

SMOOTH STUCCO SMOOTH STUCCO SMOOTH STUCCO
PT-3 CMU-1 CMU-1 PT-3
CMU-1
+ 30' - 0"
Allowable NMU Heighit + 40' - 0"

SMOOTH STUCCO

SMOOTH STUCCO
CMU
CMU
+ 36' - 8"
+ 30' - 0"
Allowable NMU Heighit + 40' - 0"
PT-2
CMU-2 CMU-2
PT-3
CMU-1
ADJACENT BUILDING A-2

SMOOTH STUCCO
SMOOTH STUCCO TYP.

PT-3
PT-2
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1" = 10'-0"

BUILDING A ELEVATIONS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
10 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
1 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

BLDG A EAST ELEVATION
2 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

BLDG A NORTH ELEVATION
3 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

BLDG A WEST ELEVATION
4 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

BLDG A SOUTH ELEVATION

MASONRY
CMU-1 INTEGRAL COLOR BURNISHED CMU BY OLDCASTLE FINISH 4303 CMU-2 INTEGRAL COLOR PRECISION CMU SMOOTH FINISH NATURAL GRAY ST-1 BRICK VENEER: BELDEN BRICK ENGLISH GRAY VELOUR
ST-2 BRICK VENEER: BELDEN BRICK TITANIUM VELOUR
ST-3 STONE VENEER: CORONADO STONE - GETTY STONE EMBASSY BLEND METAL
MT-1 IMETCO LATITUDE WALL SYSTEMS BOX RIB B, PRECOATED ALUMINUM PANELS SMOOTH FINISH COLOR:

CHARCOAL. ORENTATION: HORIZONTAL
MT-2 BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM
MT-3 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
MT-4 COLOR TO MATCH FIRESTONE UNA-CLAB METAL MATTE BLACK MT-5 COLOR TO MATCH FIRESTON UNA-CLAB CITYSCAPE
MT-6 SMOOTH KYNAR FINISH COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS ELECTRIC LIME GREEN 6921 MT-7 COLOR TO MATCH FIRESTON UNA-CLAB METAL BONE WHITE
MT-8 FACTORY FINISH STAINLESS STEEL.

MT-9 FACTORY FINISH BLACK
MT-10 SMOOTH KYNAR FINISH COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS BLACK MT-11 LONGBOARD 6” V GROVE PLANKS COLOR: ULTRA WHITE
MT-12 FIRESTONE METAL PANEL - CFP-16F. COLOR: BLUE
WD-1 LONGBOARD 6” CHANNEL GROVE PLANKS WITH LIGHT NATIONAL WALNUT (LNW) FINISH PAINT
PT-1 EPOXY PRIME & PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7069 IRON ORE PT-2 PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW9173 SHITAKE
PT-3 PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7627 WHITE HERON PT-4 EPOXY PRIME & PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6995 SUPERWHITE PT-5 EPOXY PRIME & PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAM SW2821 DOWNING STONE PT-6 EPOXY PRIME & PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7650 ELLIE GRAY PT-7 PAINT TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7653 SILVERPOINTE A
B C
D
1 2
3 4 PAD

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) BLDG A-2 BLDG A-1
Exit
Exit
Storefront

ENTRY/EXIT
Patio
Storefront

ENTRY/EXIT
Depressed Loading Bay
Compactor and Trash Enclosure
Parcel LineParcel Line
Loading &Deliveries
Trash Enclosure
(E) Ramp Down (E) Ramp Down
Compactor
Separate Dumpster For Trash,
Recycle, And Compost.

Overhead Coiling Door
Overhead Coiling Door
Grease Waste
Continuous Screen Wall
Overhead Coiling Door
Overhead Coiling Door
Continuous Screen Wall
Metal Roof Over Dumpster
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

BUILDING A PLANS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
11 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
1 Scale: 1" = 20'-0"

BLDG A FLOOR PLAN
2 Scale: 1" = 20'-0"

BLDG A ROOF PLAN
A
B
C
D
3 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"

COMPACTOR BAY
PAD

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) 144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

BUILDING B PERSPECTIVE
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
12 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
ABC
D
B1 Scale: N.T.S.

Bldg B Existing
B1 Scale: N.T.S.

Bldg B Perspective
PAD

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) + 26' - 8" + 25' - 4"
+ 16' - 2"
Remove Existing Canopy
Remove Existing Mansard Roof Remove Existing
Mansard Roof
Remove Existing Clay Tile Roofing
+ 25' - 0"
+ 32' - 6"
Not in Scope Existing Building
to Remain
Proposed Facade
Remodel
?
ST-2
PT-6
Canopy
Remodel

COLOR BY
TENANT
MT-11

COLOR BY
TENANT
PT-4
+ 25' - 0"
+ 32' - 6"
Not in Scope Existing
Building to Remain
Proposed Facade
Remodel
?
PT-6
ST-2
Canopy
Remodel

COLOR BY
TENANT

COLOR BY
TENANT
MT-11
PT-4
Not in Scope Existing Building to Remain
+ 32' - 6"
+ 25' - 0"
+ 16' - 2"
Allowable NMU Heighit + 40' - 0"
Proposed Facade Remodel Proposed Facade Remodel Proposed Entry Canopy Proposed Facade Remodel MT-11
MT-1 PT-6
PT-6
WD-1
ST-2 PT-7

COLOR BY TENANT

EXISTING

STOREFRONT

SMOOTH STUCCO
PT-5 MODULAR LARGE PLANK WOOD/COMPOSITE WOOD
PLANTER & GLASS RESTAURANT PATIO BOUNDARY.

EXISTING
STOREFRONT PT-5

BRICK VENEER

SMOOTH STUCCO
ST-2
PT-4
PT-7
PT-4 PT-6 MT-1 MT-7

EXISTING TENANT SIGNS
TO BE REUSED TYP.

EXISTING

PROPOSED

UPGRADE EXISTING METAL RAILING WITH

MODULAR LARGE PLANK WOOD/COMPOSITE WOOD
PLANTER & GLASS RESTAURANT PATIO BOUNDARY.
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

BUILDING B ELEVATIONS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
13 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
A
B
C
D
1B Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

EXISTING EAST ELEVATION
4 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION
2 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION 3 Scale: 1" = 10'-0"WEST ELEVATION
1 2
3 4
1A Scale: 1" = 10'-0"

EAST ELEVATION
PAD

PATIO PERSPECTIVE

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) (E) Overhead
Coiling Door
(E) Covered
At Grade
Loading
(E) Depressed Loading
Dock

PARCEL LINE
(E) Exit (E) Exit
(E) Storefront

ENTRY/EXIT

PROPOSED ENTRY
CANOPY

PARCEL LINE
(E) Ramp Down
(E) Retail Storage and Shipping
(E) Retail Store
(E) Restaurant
(E) Veterinarian
Building A-2
(E) Patio Upgrade
*(E) = EXISTING CONSTRUCTION

PROPOSED

FACADE REMODEL

PROPOSED

FACADE REMODEL
Scope Of Work Partial Facade Remodel
And Canopy Remodel
Proposed Entry
Canopy
Scope Of Work Partial Facade
Remodel And Canopy Remodel
Propose Facade
Remodel
Propose Facade
Remodel
(E) Roof
*(E) = EXISTING CONSTRUCTION
(E) Roof
(E) Roof

REMOVE EXISTING

ENTRY CANOPY

REMOVE EXISTING

MANSARD ROOF

REMOVE EXISTING

MANSARD ROOF

REMOVE CLAY

TILE ROOFING
*(E) = EXISTING CONSTRUCTION
(E) Roof (E) Roof
(E) Roof
Scope Of Work Partial Facade
Remodel And Canopy Remodel
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

BUILDING B & C PLANS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
14 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
A
B
C
D
1 Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
Floor Plan Bldg B and C
2B Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
PROPOSE ROOF PLAN 2A Scale: 1" = 20'-0"EXISTING ROOF PLAN PAD
3 Scale: 12" = 1'-0"

PATIO UPGRADE CONCEPT IMAGE

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Replace the Existing Clay Tile Roof
to Tie Into the Shopping Centers
New Design
Paint Existing Facade
Remove and Reinstall Existing
Signage After Applying New Paint
Scheme
+ 14' - 6"
Allowable NMU Heighit + 40' - 0"
+ 17' - 0"
+ 13' - 6" + 15' - 4"
PT-5 PT-5 PT-5
Proposed Facade Remodel

EXISTING STUCCO

BRICK VENEER
EXISTING STOREFRONT TYP.

EXISTING
STUCCO

WOOD VENEER

STONE VENEER

METAL PANEL

SMOOTH STUCCO
SMOOTH STUCCO TYP.

PT-6
PT-2
EXISTING TENANT SIGN TYP. WOOD VENEER

STONE VENEER

METAL PANEL

SMOOTH STUCCO
ST-3
WD-1
EXISTING STOREFRONT TYP.

PT-4
MT-1
PT-4 PT-6 MT-1 MT-11 MT-1 PT-4 ST-3 WD-1
PT-4
ST-3
ST-3 PT-4 WD-1
PT-5
PT-5
Proposed Facade Remodel

WOOD VENEER

STONE VENEER

METAL PANEL
PT-6 ST-3
WD-1
MT-1
EXISTING STOREFRONT TYP.

Existing Bldg.
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

BUILDING D PERSPECTIVE
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
15 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
D1 Scale: N.T.S.

EXSITING SHOPS UPGRADE D1 Scale: N.T.S.EXISTING SHOPS
A
B
C
D
D2 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"

BUILDING D NORTH ELEVATION

BUILDING D EAST ELEVATION

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

EXISTING DRIVE AISLE
(E) Patio Upgrade
*(E) = EXISTING CONSTRUCTION
Existing
Bldg.
(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT
(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT(E) TENANT Scope Canopy Remodel
(E) Roof
Scope Canopy Remodel

REMOVE CLAY

TILE ROOFING
(E) Roof
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
1" = 20'-0"

BUILDING D PLANS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
16 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
ABC
D
D1 Scale: 1" = 20'
-0"

BUILDING D FLOOR PLAN
D2 Scale: 1" = 20'
-0"

PROPOSED ROOF
D2 Scale: 1" = 20'
-0"

EXSITING ROOF
1 2
PAD

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

PAD BLDG
Storefront
Storefront
Trash Enclosure
Entry/Exit
Entry/Exit
Loading &
Deliveries
Patio
Elec. Room
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

PAD BUILDING PERSPECTIVE
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
17 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
ABC
D
1 Scale: N.T.S.

PROPOSED BUILDING A
2 Scale: 1/8" = 1'
-0"
Floor Plan Pad
PAD

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) + 25' - 0"
+ 20' - 6"

SMOOTH STUCCO

METAL PANEL SYSTEM

METAL AWNING

STONE VENEER
PT-6
PT-4

METAL PANEL SYSTEM
MT-12
MT-13
PT-1
MT-2 ST-3
+ 25' - 0"
+ 20' - 6"

SMOOTH STUCCO

FABRIC AWNING METAL PANEL SYSTEM

STONE VENEER
PT-6 PT-4
MT-2 ST-3
MT-12
MT-13
+ 20' - 6"
+ 25' - 0"
MT-13
MT-12
ST-3
PT-6 PT-4
PT-1
MT-2

SMOOTH STUCCO

FABRIC AWNING
MT-2

METAL PANEL SYSTEM

METAL AWNING

STONE VENEER
+ 25' - 0"
+ 20' - 6"

METAL AWNING

METAL PANEL SYSTEM

STONE VENEER
MT-13
MT-12
PT-1
ST-3
MT-2
PT-4
PT-6

SMOOT STUCCO
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
3/16" = 1'-0"

PAD BUILDING ELEVATIONS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
18 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
A
B
C
D
PAD

PAD NORTH ELEVATION
P1 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
PAD EAST ELEVATION P3 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"PAD SOUTH ELEVATION P2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"

PAD WEST ELEVATION

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Existing Masonry Wall
Property Line
Existing Grass Hill
Existing Retaining Wall
30' - 0"
Property Line

DRIVE PROPOSED BUILDING A
AISLE

EXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE DEMOLISHED, RE-GRADED, AND
RE-CONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE 90 DEGREE PARKING

EXISTING DRIVE AISLE ALICIA

PARKWAY
19 4
36' - 8"
Parking Lot Lighting
• Existing Ligh Pole Mounting Height +35'
• Proposed Ligh Pole Mounting Height +35'
+/- 394.22' @ Nort End of Loading Bay
+/- 400' @ South End of Loading Bay
Existing Residential Wood Fence
Existing Grass Hill
Existing Retaining Wall
Proposed Depressed Loading Dock
Existing Adjacent Grade
Existing Adjacent Grade Beyond
Property Line
+ 30' - 0"
Wall Mounted Light Fixture
Mounted Lower Than Existing
Adjacent Residential Fence
Proposed Masonry
Sound Wall
Pole Mounted Light Fixture
Mounted Lower Than Existing
Adjacent Residential Fence
Existing Trees
Existing Masonry Wall
Property Line
Existing Grass Hill
Existing Retaining Wall
Existing Adjacent
Grade
Property Line
+ 30' - 0"
Existing Retaining Wall
Wall Mounted Light Fixture
Mounted Lower Than Existing
Adjacent Residential Fence
Pole Mounted Light Fixture
Mounted Lower Than Existing
Adjacent Residential Fence
Existing Trees
16'-0"
396.25'
Existing Residential
Wood Fence Beyond
Proposed Depressed Loading Dock
+ 30' - 0"
Proposed CMU
Sound Wall
Existing Trees
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

SITE SECTION
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
19 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
1 Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
Bldg A1 Depressed Loading Dock
3 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
Bldg A1 Depressed Loading Dock 4 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"Bldg A1 BACK OF HOUSE 2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
Bldg A1 Depressed Loading Dock

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Property Line
Existing Slope
DRIVE
AISLE
Parking Lot Lighting
• Existing Ligh Pole Mounting Height +35'
• Proposed Ligh Pole Mounting Height +35'
Propose Sound Wall
144 North Orange Street, Orange, California 92866
714 / 639-9860
aoarchitects.com
Scale
Job No.

Date
As indicated

SITE VIEWS
24901 Alicia Pkwy

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
20 ENTITLEMENT
12-21-2022
2020-434
R1 Scale: 12" = 1'
-0"
VIEW FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL 1
R2 Scale: 12" = 1'
-0"
VIEW FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL 2
R3 Scale: 12" = 1'
-0"
VIEW FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL 3
R4 Scale: 12" = 1'
-0"
VIEW FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL 4
R5 Scale: 1" = 10'
-0"

SITE SECTION

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

PROPOSED

PAD BUILDING

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-1

PROPOSED
BUILDING A-2 ALICIA PKWY

HON AVE

BENTLEY LANE
CAMBERWELL STREET ∆
∆
∆
∆
∆ 24901 ALICIA PKWY. LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 © TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. XXXXX PREPARED FOR LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA C 87934
SCALE: 1" = 50'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 24"X36"
NORTH
LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

EXISTING SEWER LINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICITY LINE

WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT
SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: MOULTON-NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT
PURPOSE: SEWER LINES AND WATER TRANSMISSION
RECORDED: NOVEMBER 7, 1974 IN BOOK 11282, PAGE 1413 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES
RECORDED: DECEMBER 3, 1974 IN BOOK 11298, PAGE 406 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: MOULTON-NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT
PURPOSE: WATER AND/OR SEWER PIPE LINES
RECORDED: DECEMBER 17, 1974 IN BOOK 11306, PAGE 1029 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO:COUNTY OF ORANGE
PURPOSE: DRAINAGE
RECORDED: JANUARY 13, 1975 IN BOOK 11321, PAGE 1763 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FOURTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: MOULTON-NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT
PURPOSE: WATER AND/OR SEWER PIPE LINES
RECORDED:FEBRUARY 24, 1975 IN BOOK 11345, PAGE 490 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FOURTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: MOULTON-NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT
PURPOSE: WATER AND/OR SEWER PIPE LINES
RECORDED: JUNE 23RD, 1975 IN BOOK 11438, PAGE 317 OF OFFICIAL

RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FOURTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
PURPOSE: MUTUAL DRIVEWAY
RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 17, 1979 IN BOOK 13311, PAGE 1254 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FOURTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: MOULTON-NIGUEL WATER DISTRICT
PURPOSE: SEWER LINES AND WATER, INCLUDING RECLAIMED

WATER AND TRANSMISSION
RECORDED: JULY 29, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 91-399579 OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FOURTH IN A DOCUMENT.

GRANTED TO: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
RECORDED: NOVEMBER 27, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20000641567

OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID LAND

EASEMENTS

EARTHWORK QUANTITIES
CUT: 3453.0 CY
FILL : 1602.0 CY
NET: 1851.0 CY (CUT)
SHEET 1 OF 1

LOT SUMMARY
EXISTING PARCEL: 1
TOTAL ACREAGE: 9.630 AC
TOTAL LOTS - 1
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED PARCEL 1:

TOTAL ACREAGE: 8.470 AC
TOTAL LOTS - 3
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED PARCEL 2:

TOTAL ACREAGE: 0.450 AC
TOTAL LOTS - 3
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
1 DRAINAGE AREA

9.63 AC
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL A:

PARCEL 1 IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 17 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP.

EXCEPT 50 PERCENT OF ALL RIGHTS TO OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON AND MINERAL SUBSTANCES LYING UNDER OR THAT MAY BE PRODUCED FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND, TOGETHER WITH 50 PERCENT OF ALL RIGHTS TO THE PROCEEDS THEREFROM AND 50 PERCENT OF ALL RENTS, BONUSES AND PROFITS ACCRUING THERETO; PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT GRANTOR WAIVES AND RELINQUISHES THE RIGHT TO USE OF OCCUPANCY OR TO ENTER UPON ANY PORTION OF THE SURFACE AND

LAND, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DRILLING FOR, CAPTURING, PRODUCING, EXTRACTING, STORING, TREATING OR OTHERWISE HANDLING OR UTILIZING SUCH OIL, GAS OR OTHER

HYDROCARBON MINERAL SUBSTANCES OR FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXERCISING GRANTOR'S RIGHT THERETO, AS RESERVED IN DEEDS FROM FIRST WESTERN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR TO FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN SANTA ANA TO JERRETT WILSON DUNLAP, A MARRIED MAN, RECORDED JULY 18, 1967 IN BOOK 8314, PAGE 98 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND J.L BROWNING, AN UNMARRIED MAN, RECORDED JULY 18, 1967 IN BOOK 8314, PAGE 104 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

SAID LAND IS SHOWN AS PARCEL 1 ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LL79-13 ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LL79-13 RECORDED MAY 17, 1979 IN BOOK 13149, PAGE 1020 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PARCEL B:

AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP, IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 17 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTRY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTRY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 75° 19' 07" WEST 45 FEET' THENCE NORTH 77° 36' 40" EAST 50.54 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF ALICIA PARKWAY 120 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT OF BEING DISTANT NORTH 14° 40' 53" EAST 23 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 14° 40' 53" WEST 23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL C:

AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP, IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 17 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY REORDER OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY KINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 NORTH 14° 40' 53" EAST 25.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF HON AVENUE, 80 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 AND THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF SOUTH 14°40' 53" WEST 75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25°59' 29" EAST 76.49 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF HON AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 75° 19' 07" EAST 15 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 75° 19' 07" WEST 15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

GENERAL SURVEY NOTES
NO TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE LOCATED BY FIELD, SURVEY WHICH ARE MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.

THE DISTANCE SHOWN FROM TO TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES IS A MEASUREMENT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE FEATURE, EXCEPT AS NOTED.

SECTION 8770.6 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE STATES THAT THE USE OF THE WORD "CERTIFY" OR "CERTIFICATION" BY

A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER IN THE PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING OR LAND SURVEYING, OR THE

PREPARATION OF MAPS, PLATS, REPORTS, DESCRIPTIONS, OR OTHER SURVEYING DOCUMENTS ONLY CONSTITUTES AN EXPRESSION

OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THOSE FACTS OR FINDINGS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE CERTIFICATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.

SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION
*WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO CITIBANK, N.A. AND COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY THEIR SUCCESSORS, NOMINEES AND ASSIGNS:
(A) THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREIN IS AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF ALL OF THE REAL PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; (B) THAT THE WITHIN SURVEY PROPERLY AND ACCURATELY INDICATES AND LOCATES ALL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE REAL PROPERTY AS OF THE DATE OF THE SURVEY; (C) THAT THE WITHIN SURVEY WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION AND

CONTROL OF THE UNDERSIGNED FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE OF THE REAL PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN' (D) THAT

THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS EITHER ACROSS PROPERTY LINES OR ZONING RESTRICTION LINES IN EFFECT AS OF THE DATE OF THE SURVEY; (E) THAT THE WITHIN SURVEY PROPERLY DESIGNATES AND LOCATES ALL VISIBLE OR RECORDED EASEMENTS AS OF THE DATE OF THE SURVEY; (F) ALL UTILITY SERVICES REQUIRED FOR THE OPERATION OF THIS PROPERTY EITHER ENTER THE

PROPERTY THROUGH THE ADJOINING PUBLIC STREETS OR IF THEY PASS THROUGH OR ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE LAND,DO SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH EASEMENTS ENURING TO THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY; (G) INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE SUBJECT

PROPERTY IS PROVIDED BY ALICIA PARKWAY UPON WHICH THE PROPERTY ABUTS, THE SAME BEING PAVED AND DEDICATED RIGHTS-OF-WAY MAINTAINED BY CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS; (H) THE PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDOUS AREA BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, AND LIES IN A Zone "x" OF MINIMUM FLOODING; (I)

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT SERVICE ANY ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE, INGRESS, EGRESS OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE; (J) THAT THE LAND, AS DESCRIBED ON THE SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ILLEGAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND UNDER LOCAL, COUNTY OR CITY ORDINANCES; AND (K) THAT THE WITHIN SURVEY (1) WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1999 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/ ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS, INCLUDING ITEMS 2,3,4,6,7(A), 7(B), 7(C), 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16 (NO EARTHWORK, SURVEY DENOTES BUILDING ADDITION HEREON), 18 (NO EVIDENCE OF SOLID WASTE DUMP, SUMP OR SANITARY LANDFILL OBSERVED DURING THIS SURVEY, 19 ( NO WETLANDS OBSERVED), 20, AND 21 OF TABLE A THERETO AND (2) COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA LAWS."

TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 2022-189
A.P. NO.: 620-011-89
DECEMBER 2022

IN THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS COUNTY OF ORANGE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LAND OWNER

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA, LLC
24841 ALICIA PARKWAY
LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653

CIVIL ENGINEER
JACOB GLAZE, P.E.

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE
700
ORANGE, CA 92868

SURVEYOR

DMC ENGINEERING
18 TECHNOLOGY DR., SUITE 100 IRVINE,
CA 92618
WATER DISTRICT:

MOULTON NIGUEL WATER

DISTRICT
SEWER DISTRICT:

MOULTON NIGUEL WATER

DISTRICT
SCHOOL DISTRICT:

SADDLEBACK VALLEY UNIFIED
ZONING DISTRICT:

CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL

FLOOD ZONE

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN

FLOOD ZONE X PER FLOOD INSURANCE

RATE MAP FOR COMMUNITY NUMBER
06059C PANELS PARTIALLY 0065F DATED
11-3-93, 0064E DATED 9-15-89 SAID AREA
DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN.

BASIS OF BEARINGS

BEING A PORTION OF THE CENTER

LINE OF ALICIA PARKWAY WHICH
BEARS N144053E PER PARCEL MAP
62/17 ON FILE IN THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE RECORDERS OFFICE.

FIRE DISTRICT:

ORANGE COUNTY FIRE
SCALE: N.T.S. AUTHORITY

VICINITY MAP

MAP PREPARED BY
JACOB GLAZE, P.E.

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
(714) 786-6297
BY:_______________________________________
JACOB GLAZE, P.E. R.C.E.# 87934 DATE
1/18/2023
DATE OF SURVEYS: OCTOBER 24, 1996, JULY 8, 1999,
APRIL 24, 2014
ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. ________________________

IN UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF

ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROPOSED PARCEL 3:

TOTAL ACREAGE - 0.710 AC
TOTAL LOTS - 3
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL

APPLICANT

MARK LAUSIER

ARCHITECTS ORANGE
144 NORTH ORANGE ST
ORANGE, CA 92866

SITE LOCATION

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ANY ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED IN THIS

APPLICATION ARE CONTAINED ON THE LISTS COMPILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 65962.5 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. ACCORDINGLY, THE PROJECT APPLICANT IS

REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SIGNED STATEMENT THAT CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:

NAME OF APPLICANT: JACOB GLAZE
ADDRESS: 1100 TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 LOCAL AGENCY: CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS / ORANGE COUNTY CA
ASSESSOR'S BOOK, PAGE AND PARCEL NUMBER: ASSESSOR BOOK 62, PAGE 17 620-011-40, 620-011-89
SPECIFY ANY LIST PURSUANT TO SECTION 65962.5 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE:

REGULATORY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

DATE OF LIST:

APPLICANT, DATE 01/18/2022

HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.b
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Attachment B – Plan Set (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

REVISED

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA
Laguna Hills, California
December 20, 2022
Prepared for:

MILAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
888 South Disneyland Drive, Suite 101
Anaheim, CA 92802 CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
24035 El Toro Road
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1

2.0 Project Scope ...................................................................................................................1

2.1 Project Description .......................................................................................................1

2.2 Study Scope ..................................................................................................................3

3.0 Existing Conditions .........................................................................................................4

3.1 Existing Street System ..................................................................................................4

3.2 Existing Volumes .........................................................................................................4

3.3 Existing Public Transit .................................................................................................4

3.4 Existing Intersection Peak Hour LOS ..........................................................................5

4.0 Traffic Forecasts .............................................................................................................9

4.1 Project Traffic Generation ............................................................................................9

4.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment .............................................................15

4.2.1 Project-Generated Traffic Volumes ..............................................................15

4.3 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Volumes ...........................................................16

4.4 Year 2024 Cumulative Base .......................................................................................16

4.4.1 Ambient Growth ...........................................................................................16

4.4.2 Cumulative Projects ......................................................................................16

4.4.3 Year 2024 Cumulative Base Traffic Volumes ..............................................16

4.5 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volumes ................................................16

5.0 Traffic Impact Analysis ................................................................................................19

5.1 Significant Impact Criteria .........................................................................................19

5.2 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Conditions ........................................................19

5.3 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions .............................................19

5.4 Caltrans Queuing Analysis .........................................................................................19

6.0 Internal Circulation and Site Access ...........................................................................28

6.1.1 Internal Circulation .......................................................................................28

6.1.2 Site Access Queuing Analysis ......................................................................41

6.1.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ...................................................................42

6.1.4 Carl’s Jr. Drive-Through Lane Queuing Evaluation .....................................52

7.0 CEQA Assessment of VMT, Active Transportation, & Public Transit ...................52

7.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis ..................................................52

7.2 Active Transportation and Public Transit Screening Analysis ..................................55

8.0 Summary Of Findings And Conclusions ....................................................................55

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills ii
Appendices

APPENDIX
A. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets (ICU Methodology) B. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets (HCM Methodology) C. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets (Simtraffic) D. Existing Traffic Count Data
E. Queueing Analysis Worksheets
F. Project Driveway Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets G. Carl’s Jr. Drive-Through Queueing Observations
H. City of Laguna Hills VMT Screening Form

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills iii

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ............................................................... 6 2 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM 6 Methodology) .................. 7 3 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections (HCM 6 Methodology) ....................... 8 4 Existing (2022) Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service ......................................................... 10 5 Project Trip Generation – Option 1A ........................................................................................... 11 6 Project Trip Generation – Option 1B ........................................................................................... 12 7 Project Trip Generation – Option 2A ........................................................................................... 13 8 Project Trip Generation – Option 2B ........................................................................................... 14 9 Location and Description of Cumulative Projects ...................................................................... 17 10 Cumulative Project Trip Generation Estimates ........................................................................... 18 11 Existing (2022) Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 1A ................ 20 12 Existing (2022) Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 1B ................ 21 13 Existing (2022) Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 2A ................ 22 14 Existing (2022) Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 2B ................ 23 15 Year 2024 Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 1A ............................................. 24 16 Year 2024 Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 1B .............................................. 25 17 Year 2024 Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 2A ............................................. 26 18 Year 2024 Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service: Option 2B .............................................. 27 19 Existing (2022) Plus Project Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 1A ........................................ 29 20 Existing (2022) Plus Project Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 1B ........................................ 30 21 Existing (2022) Plus Project Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 2A ........................................ 31 22 Existing (2022) Plus Project Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 2B ........................................ 32 23 Year 2024 Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 1A ..................................................................... 33 24 Year 2024 Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 1B ..................................................................... 34 25 Year 2024 Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 2A ..................................................................... 35 26 Year 2024 Caltrans Queuing Analysis: Option 2B ..................................................................... 36 27 Year 2024 Project Driveway Queueing Analysis: Option 1A .................................................... 37 28 Year 2024 Project Driveway Queueing Analysis: Option 1B .................................................... 38 29 Year 2024 Project Driveway Queueing Analysis: Option 2A .................................................... 39 30 Year 2024 Project Driveway Queueing Analysis: Option 2B .................................................... 40

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills iv

LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED)

TABLE PAGE
31 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 1A .............. 43 32 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 1B .............. 44 33 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 2A .............. 45 34 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 2B .............. 46 35 Year 2024 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 1A ........................................... 47 36 Year 2024 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 1B ........................................... 48 37 Year 2024 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 2A ........................................... 49 38 Year 2024 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary: Option 2B ........................................... 50 39 Proposed Fast-Food with Drive-Thru Queueing Analysis Summary:

Weekday Conditions .................................................................................................................... 52 40 Proposed Fast-Food with Drive-Thru Queueing Analysis Summary:

Saturday Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 53

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills v

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE FOLLOWING PAGE
1 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project Site Plan – Option 1A (with New Drive-Thru) ................................................................ 1 3 Project Site Plan – Option 1B (with New Pad Building) .............................................................. 1 4 Project Site Plan – Option 2A (with New Drive-Thru) ................................................................ 1 5 Project Site Plan – Option 2B (with New Pad Building) .............................................................. 1 6 Existing Roadway and Intersection Physical Characteristics .................................................... 4 7 Existing (2022) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 4 8 Existing (2022) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................................... 4 9 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern ............................................................................................. 15 10 Project Option 1A Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................................................ 15 11 Project Option 1A Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................................................. 15 12 Project Option 1B Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................................................ 15 13 Project Option 1B Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................................................. 15 14 Project Option 2A Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................................................ 15 15 Project Option 2A Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................................................. 15 16 Project Option 2B Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour ................................................................ 15 17 Project Option 2B Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour ................................................................. 15 18 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 1A AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................... 16 19 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 1A PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................ 16 20 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 1B AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................ 16 21 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 1B PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................ 16 22 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 2A AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................... 16 23 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 2A PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................ 16 24 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 2B AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................ 16 25 Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 2B PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................ 16 26 Location of Cumulative Projects .................................................................................................. 16 27 Year 2024 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Base Traffic Volumes ............................................... 16 28 Year 2024 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Base Traffic Volumes ................................................ 16 29 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 1A AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................ 16 30 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 1A PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................ 16

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills vi

LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED)

FIGURE FOLLOWING PAGE
31 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 1B AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................ 16 32 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 1B PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................. 16 33 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 2A AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................ 16 34 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 2A PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................ 16 35 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 2B AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................ 16 36 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Option 2B PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................. 16 37 Alicia Parkway Conceptual Improvement Plan ........................................................................ 41

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 20, 2022
A. Project Description – The existing Laguna Hills Plaza is located at 24901 Alicia Parkway in the City of Laguna Hills, and totals 106,285 square feet (SF) of gross floor area consisting of 87,231 SF of retail, 10,130 SF of restaurants, 6,168 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. The Project proposes to increase the retail and restaurant square footage (the existing offices, health club/martial arts studio, Carl’s Jr., and the western shops building will be maintained) with the following four development scenarios ranging in total size for the shopping center between 100,409 SF (Option 1A) and 106,456 SF (Option 2B):
 Major Building Option 1A and Option 1B: Demolish the existing 45,013-SF ‘Dick’s Sporting Goods’ building at the northeast corner of the Plaza and construct a new/replacement 42,709-SF Grocery Store, as well as 3,362 SF of in-line restaurants with 1,000 SF of outdoor seating.
o Option 1A with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Fast-Food with Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF “shops building” on the eastern edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with a new 2,500-SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru located between the existing driveways along Alicia Parkway (on the property’s southern boundary). Option 1A will result in a total of 100,409 SF consisting of 76,000 SF of retail, 16,992 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. o Option 1B with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Retail and FastFood without Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the east edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with approximately 3,126 SF of retail uses and a 1,875-SF fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 1B will result in a total of 102,910 SF consisting of 79,126 SF of retail, 16,367 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.
 Major Building Option 2A and Option 2B: Demolish the existing 45,013-SF ‘Dick’s Sporting Goods’ building at the northeast corner of the Plaza, construct a

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills viii
new/replacement 42,709-SF Grocery Store, and expand the existing 25,532-SF ‘BIG Lots’ tenant space by 7,908 SF.
o Option 2A with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Fast-Food with Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the eastern edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with a new 2,500-SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru located between the existing driveways along Alicia Parkway (on the property’s southern boundary). Option 2A will result in a total of 103,955 SF consisting of 83,908 SF of retail, 12,630 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. o Option 2B with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Retail and FastFood without Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the east edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with approximately 3,126 SF of retail uses and a 1,875-SF fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 2B will result in a total of 106,456 SF consisting of 87,034 SF of retail, 12,005 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.

B. Project Trip Generation – Option 1A net-generated trips are estimated to be 2,683 weekday trips, 196 AM peak hour trips, and 231 PM peak hour trips. Table 6 indicates that Option 1B net-generated trips are estimated to be 2,719 weekday daily trips, 221 AM peak hour trips, and 243 PM peak hour trips (greater than Option 1A during each time period). Option 2A netgenerated trips are estimated to be 2,986 weekday trips, 207 AM peak hour trips, and 250 PM peak hour trips. Table 8 indicates that Option 2B net-generated trips are estimated to be 3,022 weekday daily trips, 232 AM peak hour trips, and 262 PM peak hour trips (greater than Option 2A during each time period).

C. Project LOS Traffic Impacts - Based on the application of the City’s impact criteria for LOS analysis described previously, the Project is not expected to cause LOS traffic impacts at any of the 12 key intersections under Existing (2022) and Year 2024 conditions.

D. Caltrans Queuing Analysis - The results of the queuing analysis conducted at each Caltrans intersection indicates that there are adequate queue storage lengths provided to accommodate the 95th percentile queues. Based on this, it is concluded that development of the Project would not result in adverse queuing conditions at Caltrans intersections.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills ix
inbound/outbound movements at each of the site access points under Year 2024 conditions, with a few exceptions described below during the peak hour noted.  The queuing results for the eastbound left-turn movement at Project Driveway #2 (from eastbound Alicia Parkway entering the Project site), and the outbound movements at Project Driveways #3 and #4 (exiting the Project site onto Hon Avenue), indicate that the 95th percentile queues would exceed existing queue storage lengths.
 To address the queue storage deficiency at the Project Driveway #2 and Alicia Parkway intersection (left-turns from eastbound Alicia Parkway entering the Project site) during the PM peak hour, eastbound left-turn pocket and median improvements along Alicia Parkway are proposed. The existing eastbound left-turn pocket on Alicia Parkway will be extended to provide a queue storage length of 135 feet in order to fully accommodate 95th percentile queues entering the Project site that range between 123 feet (under Option 2B) and 135 feet (under Option 2A).  Related to the queue storage deficiencies reported for the outbound/exiting movements from the Project site onto Hon Avenue at Project Driveway #3 (during the PM peak hour) and at Project Driveway #4 (during the AM and PM peak hours), it should be noted that the 95th percentile queues occur on site, not on Hon Avenue, so Project-related queues do not impact traffic flows on any public street. The outbound queue storage lengths provided at each of these two driveways are constrained by the presence of the easternmost drive aisle for the Plaza (a site plan design necessity for adequate internal circulation and parking accessibility) and the existing driveway for the bank building pad (that is not a part of the Project) on the northwest corner of the Hon Avenue and Alicia Parkway intersection. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers often familiar with and able to anticipate typical peak queues occurring on site, and are able to self-regulate until queues dissipate at the exits (and exiting traffic flows from shopping centers tend to dissipate quickly because vehicle departures are more random and less directional/focused compared to outbound traffic from office buildings during the PM peak hour, for example). Based on these considerations, it is concluded that the outbound 95th percentile queues at Project Driveways #3 and #4 may be measurably adverse, but not considered significant to warrant any physical improvements.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills x
and the signalized intersection of Costeau Street and Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #6), which is a distance of only 350 feet. Alicia Parkway is a primary arterial, and therefore requires a minimum of a ¼-mile spacing between signalized intersections. Additionally, it is not uncommon for minor streets at unsignalized intersections to experience longer delay due to the heavy volumes on the major street, especially during commute peak periods on weekdays and weekends.

G. CEQA VMT Assessment - Based on the application of the City’s screening criteria, and using the City’s spreadsheet tool developed for project screening purposes, it was determined that the Project is a local serving land use and located in a low VMT area, and is therefore screened out from further VMT Project-level assessment because it can be presumed to have less-thansignificant impact on VMT. The City’s VMT screening form for the Project is included in Appendix H.

H. CEQA Active Transportation and Public Transit Assessment - The proposed Project would not have an impact on the existing multimodal network; specifically, it would not: (1) conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy related to bicycle, pedestrian, and public transit; (2) substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature; and (3) result in inadequate emergency access. The proposed site plan for the Project will maintain existing sidewalks and access to public transit, construct new pedestrian connections on site and with adjoining uses, provide 12 short-term (bike racks) and 3 long-term (bike lockers) bicycle spaces, provide 2 EV charging stations, provide for future EV stations in the parking field (with stub-out electrical lines), and meet City design standards regarding site access, multimodal connectivity within the internal site circulation system, emergency access, and on-site parking.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
1 REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR

LAGUNA HILLS PLAZA

LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 20, 2022

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to evaluate potential traffic impacts resulting from the renovation of the existing and currently operating “Laguna Hills Plaza” commercial shopping center, located at 24901 Alicia Parkway in the City of Laguna Hills (herein referred to as the “Project”).

Based on study scope consultation with City staff, and consistent with the City of Laguna Hills Traffic Study Guidelines (August 31, 2010) and the City of Laguna Hills Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Guidelines under the California Environmental Quality Act (July 9, 2020), this report presents a Level of Service (LOS) analysis and VMT screening assessment for the Project, including an inventory of existing characteristics and traffic volumes at key locations within the study area, forecasts of vehicular traffic anticipated to be generated by the Project, evaluation of potential LOS impacts of these Project-generated trips on the surrounding street system, site access and internal circulation analysis (including drive-thru queuing), and Project screening related to VMT, active transportation, and public transit.

2.0 PROJECT SCOPE

2.1 Project Description
Figure 1 presents a Project vicinity map and study area. Applying the City’s (and Caltrans) convention of expressing the north-south orientation based on the I-5 Freeway, the Project site is bound by Hon Avenue on the east, Alicia Parkway on the south, and the Property Limits on the west and north.

The existing Laguna Hills Plaza is located at 24901 Alicia Parkway in the City of Laguna Hills, and totals 106,285 square feet (SF) of gross floor area consisting of 87,231 SF of retail, 10,130 SF of restaurants, 6,168 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. As illustrated on Figures 2 through 5, the Project proposes to increase the retail and restaurant square footage (the existing offices, health club/martial arts studio, Carl’s Jr., and the western shops building will be maintained) with the following four development scenarios ranging in total size for the shopping center between 100,409 SF (Option 1A) and 106,456 SF (Option 2B):
 Major Building Option 1A and Option 1B: Demolish the existing 45,013-SF ‘Dick’s Sporting Goods’ building at the northeast corner of the Plaza and construct a new/replacement 42,709-SF Grocery Store, as well as 3,362 SF of in-line restaurants with 1,000 SF of outdoor seating.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
2 o Option 1A with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Fast-Food with Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF “shops building” on the eastern edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with a new 2,500-SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru located between the existing driveways along Alicia Parkway (on the property’s southern boundary). Option 1A will result in a total of 100,409 SF consisting of 76,000 SF of retail, 16,992 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.
o Option 1B with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Retail and Fast-Food without Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the east edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with approximately 3,126 SF of retail uses and a 1,875-SF fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 1B will result in a total of 102,910 SF consisting of 79,126 SF of retail, 16,367 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.
 Major Building Option 2A and Option 2B: Demolish the existing 45,013-SF ‘Dick’s Sporting Goods’ building at the northeast corner of the Plaza, construct a new/replacement 42,709-SF Grocery Store, and expand the existing 25,532-SF ‘BIG Lots’ tenant space by 7,908 SF.
o Option 2A with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Fast-Food with Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the eastern edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with a new 2,500-SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru located between the existing driveways along Alicia Parkway (on the property’s southern boundary). Option 2A will result in a total of 103,955 SF consisting of 83,908 SF of retail, 12,630 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. o Option 2B with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Retail and Fast-Food without Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the east edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with approximately 3,126 SF of retail uses and a 1,875-SF fast-food

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
3 restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 2B will result in a total of 106,456 SF consisting of 87,034 SF of retail, 12,005 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.

No work is planned for the existing 2,497-SF drive-thru restaurant (‘Carl’s Jr.’) or the in-line shops buildings sited at western edge of the Plaza.

The existing parking lot with diagonal/angled/60-degree parking spaces and one-way drive aisles will be reconfigured to provide 90-degree parking spaces and two-way drive aisles. A parking study was prepared by LLG under separate cover, which indicates that the existing parking supply of 516 spaces will be revised to 500 spaces with development of Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B. The parking study also concludes that there would be adequate parking supply in the future that could fully meet the total parking needs of the Plaza with development of the Project.

2.2 Study Scope
The work scope for this traffic impact study, including the base assumptions, technical methodologies, and geographic coverage, were developed in conjunction with City staff, and are in accordance with the City’s and Caltrans traffic study guidelines.

All intersections identified by the City of Laguna Hills and the City of Mission Viejo considered to be within the Project’s influence area were included in this study, in addition to the I-5 Freeway northbound and southbound ramp intersections along Alicia Parkway. As illustrated on Figure 1, a total of 12 key intersections were selected for detailed peak hour traffic impact/level of service analysis during the weekday AM and PM commute peak hours under each of the four traffic scenarios described below.

The following four traffic scenarios were evaluated in this study:
 Existing (2022) - The analysis of existing traffic conditions is intended to provide a base of analysis for the remainder of the study. The existing conditions analysis includes an assessment of the streets in the area, current traffic volumes, and operating conditions.  Existing (2022) plus Project - This is an analysis of existing traffic conditions with the addition of Project-generated traffic.
 Year 2024 Cumulative Base - This phase of analysis projects future traffic growth and operating conditions in the Year 2024 (completion year for the Project) which could be expected to result from regional growth and related projects without the addition of Project traffic.
 Year 2024 Cumulative plus Project - This is an analysis of future traffic conditions in the Year 2024 (completion year for the Project) with the addition of Project-generated traffic.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

3.1 Existing Street System
A comprehensive inventory of the street system within the study area was undertaken to develop a detailed description of existing traffic characteristics. Figure 6 illustrates the existing physical characteristics of the key intersections and streets, including intersection geometry and traffic control, number of travel lanes, median type, parking designations, and posted speed limits.

3.2 Existing Volumes
Traffic counts were conducted at the 12 key intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak period while school was in session (7:00 to 9:00 AM, 4:00 to 6:00 PM) in March 2022. In addition, drive-thru queue observations were conducted at the existing Carl’s Jr. on a typical weekday and Saturday between the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM, and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM.

The bank parcel on the northwest corner of the Hon Avenue and Alicia Parkway intersection (this former Chase Bank parcel is not a part of the Project nor is it owned by Project ownership) was not occupied on the dates that traffic counts were conducted. To address this, trip generation for the vacant bank parcel was estimated based on the application of ITE rates, and resulting trips were then assigned to the street system and added to the raw traffic counts collected at the 12 key intersections.

Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the 12 key intersections, respectively.

3.3 Existing Public Transit
Public transit bus service is provided in the Project area by OCTA. Two OCTA bus routes serve the Project site via Alicia Parkway and Paseo de Valencia. The bus routes are described below:

1. OCTA Route 87: provides service from Rancho Santa Margarita to Laguna Niguel; via Alicia Parkway.

2. OCTA Route 91: provides service from Laguna Hills to San Clemente; via Paseo de Valencia to Camino Capistrano to Del Obispo Street.

The bus stop nearest the Project site is located on the north side of Alicia Parkway, just east of Project Driveway 1. The second nearest bus stop is located on the southeast corner of the Costeau Street and Alicia Parkway intersection.

OCTA also operates the OC Go Senior Mobility Program (SMP) for residents over the age of 60 that provides local taxi transportation services for shopping, errands, or non-emergency medical transportation. In addition, OCTA offers a Youth Ride Free Program which allows youth ages 6 to 18 to ride OC Bus for free relating to school, sports, work, and other activities.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
5 3.4 Existing Intersection Peak Hour LOS
Level of Service (LOS) qualitatively measures the operating conditions within a traffic system and how drivers and passengers perceive these conditions. Level of service ranges from LOS A to overloaded conditions at LOS F. LOS D is typically recognized as the minimum satisfactory service level in urban areas. According to Caltrans traffic impact analysis guidelines, LOS D is also the minimum acceptable service level at Caltrans intersections.

Based upon the Cities of Laguna Hills and Mission Viejo traffic study guidelines for LOS analysis, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology was used to determine the volume-to-capacity relationship for signalized intersections (based upon the individual volumeto-capacity ratios for key conflicting traffic movements), and corresponding level of service. By assuming 1,700 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl) as the practical capacity for through lanes, left-turn, and right-turn lanes, the ICU method directly relates traffic demand to the available capacity. The resulting ICU numerical value represents the greatest green time requirements plus a 5% allowance (additional ICU value of 0.05) for clearance intervals for the entire intersection. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. Level of service definitions for signalized intersections are summarized in Table 1.

Based upon the Cities of Laguna Hills and Mission Viejo traffic impact study guidelines, the methodology in Chapters 20 and 21 of the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition [Transportation Research Board, 2016] was applied in the analysis of the unsignalized key intersections. The HCM stop-control methodology determines the delay and level of service of each approach separately. Whereas the ICU methodology for signalized intersections uses capacity to describe total intersection operation, the HCM method for unsignalized intersections yields a delay value for each intersection approach. The vehicle total delay on any approach is primarily a function of the volume on the subject approach, and secondarily a function of the volume on the opposing and conflicting approaches. Level of service definitions for unsignalized intersections are described in Table 2.

In addition, the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6) Operations methodology was applied in the analysis of all freeway ramp intersections (to address Caltrans traffic impact study requirements). In Chapter 18 of the HCM 6, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle, as indicated in Table 3.

The HCM 6 methodology was also applied in Project site access evaluation of this report, for the purposes of evaluating vehicular access and queuing conditions at Project driveway intersections.

Based upon the level of service methodologies described, the existing peak hour traffic volumes presented were used in conjunction with existing lane configurations to determine the current traffic operating conditions at the 12 key intersections.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
6 TABLE 1

LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level of Service
(LOS)
Intersection Capacity
Utilization Value (ICU) Level of Service Description
A  0.600
EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer
than one red light, and no approach phase is
fully used.

B 0.601 – 0.700
VERY GOOD. An occasional approach
phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin
to feel somewhat restricted within groups
of vehicles.

C 0.701 – 0.800
GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to
wait through more than one red light;
backups may develop behind turning
vehicles.

D 0.801 – 0.900
FAIR. Delays may be substantial during
portions of the rush hours, but enough
lower volume periods occur to permit
clearing of developing lines, preventing
excessive backups.

E 0.901 – 1.000
POOR. Represents the most vehicles
intersection approaches can accommodate;
may be long lines of waiting vehicles
through several signal cycles.

F > 1.000
FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations
or on cross streets may restrict or prevent
movement of vehicles out of the
intersection approaches. Potentially very
long delays with continuously increasing
queue lengths.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
7 TABLE 2
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6 METHODOLOGY) 1,2 Level of Service
(LOS)
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)
Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description A  10.0 Little or no delay
B > 10.0 and  15.0 Short traffic delays
C > 15.0 and  25.0 Average traffic delays
D > 25.0 and  35.0 Long traffic delays
E > 35.0 and  50.0 Very long traffic delays
F > 50.0 Severe congestion
1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 20: Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. The LOS criteria apply to each lane on a given approach and to each approach on the minor street. LOS is not calculated for major-street approaches or for the intersection as a whole. 2 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 21: All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. For approaches and intersection-wide assessment, LOS is defined solely by control delay.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
8 TABLE 3
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6 METHODOLOGY)3 Level of Service
(LOS)
Control Delay Per Vehicle
(seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description
A < 10.0
This level of service occurs when progression is
extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.

B > 10.0 and < 20.0
This level generally occurs with good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay.

C > 20.0 and < 35.0
Average traffic delays. These higher delays may result
from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both.

Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level.

The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this
level, though many still pass through the intersection
without stopping.

D > 35.0 and < 55.0
Long traffic delays At level D, the influence of
congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may
result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.

Individual cycle failures are noticeable.

E > 55.0 and < 80.0
Very long traffic delays This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long
cycle lengths and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.

F  80.0
Severe congestion This level, considered to be
unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over
saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major
contributing factors to such delay levels.
3 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6, Chapter 19: Signalized Intersections.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
9 Appendix A,B, and C contain the detailed level of service worksheets. Appendix D contains the raw traffic count data collected as well as the supplemental data for the existing vacant Chase Bank parcel
Table 4 summarizes the existing levels of service for the 12 key intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. As Table 4 indicates, all 12 key intersections currently operate at acceptable service levels during the AM and PM peak hours of a typical weekday.

4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS
In order to determine potential traffic impacts of the Project, a multi-step process has been utilized. The first step is traffic generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is estimated by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the Project development tabulation with applicable trip adjustments/credits to account for the existing land uses on site, internal capture, and/or alternative modes of transportation.

The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound Project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel patterns in the study area.

The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of Project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area.

With the forecasting process complete and Project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the proposed Project is isolated by comparing levels of service at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without Project-generated traffic. The significance of the Project’s impacts, and the need for site-specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements, can then be determined.

4.1 Project Traffic Generation
Tables 5 through 8 present the estimation of Project-generated trips presuming the development of Option 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B, respectively.

Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 11th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2021].

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
10 TABLE 4
EXISTING (2022) INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.483 -- A No
Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.580 -- A No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.0 C No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 23.3 C No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.5 C No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.0 C No
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.5 B No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.0 B No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 15.6 C No
6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.583 -- A No
Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.504 -- A No
7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.560 -- A No
Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.459 -- A No
8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.571 -- A No
Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.572 -- A No
9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.920 -- E Yes
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.958 -- E Yes
HCM: AM -- 34.2 C No
PM -- 44.7 D No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.602 -- B No
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.737 -- C No
HCM: AM -- 13.3 B No
PM -- 22.7 C No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.605 -- B No
Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.640 -- B No
12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.763 -- C No
Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.789 -- C No
Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) ICU
Peak
Hour
Existing (2022)
Poor
LOS LOS?
Delay
(s/v)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
11 TABLE 5
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION – OPTION 1A
LAND USE Daily In Out Total In Out Total
ITE TRIP RATES [a]
ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) with Supermarket 94.49 62% 38% 3.53 48% 52% 9.03 ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) without Supermarket 67.52 62% 38% 1.73 49% 51% 5.19 ITE LU 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 467.48 51% 49% 44.61 52% 48% 33.03

PROPOSED PROJECT
Shopping Plaza with Supermarket 95,412 SF 9,015 209 128 337 414 448 862 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (902) (21) (13) (34) (166) (179) (345) Shopping Plaza with Supermarket Total 8,113 188 115 303 248 269 517 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
New Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 2,500 SF 1,169 57 55 112 43 40 83 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (28) (57) (24) (22) (46) New Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window Total 877 28 27 55 19 18 37 Project Trip Generation: 9,865 244 169 413 286 305 591

EXISTING SITE
Shopping Plaza without Supermarket 103,788 SF 7,008 112 68 180 264 275 539 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (701) (11) (7) (18) (106) (110) (216) Shopping Plaza without Supermarket Total 6,307 101 61 162 158 165 323 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
Existing Trip Generation: 7,182 129 88 217 177 183 360
NET PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 2,683 115 81 196 109 122 231 Proposed Project (blue) Minus Existing Site (green)
Notes:
[a] Source: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. [b]
[c]
Consistent with Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. Pass-by reductions for ITE Land Use 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) consist of the following: 10% weekday daily (estimated), 10% weekday AM (estimated), 40% weekday PM.

Consistent with Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. Pass-by reductions for ITE Land Use 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window consist of the following: 25% weekday daily (estimated), 50% weekday AM, 55% weekday PM. (trips/KSF)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Unit / Size
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
12 TABLE 6
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION – OPTION 1B
LAND USE Daily In Out Total In Out Total
ITE TRIP RATES [a]
ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) with Supermarket 94.49 62% 38% 3.53 48% 52% 9.03 ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) without Supermarket 67.52 62% 38% 1.73 49% 51% 5.19 ITE LU 822: Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 54.45 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59 ITE LU 933: Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 450.49 58% 42% 43.18 50% 50% 33.21 ITE LU 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 467.48 51% 49% 44.61 52% 48% 33.03

PROPOSED PROJECT
Shopping Plaza with Supermarket 95,412 SF 9,015 209 128 337 414 448 862 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (902) (21) (13) (34) (166) (179) (345) Shopping Plaza with Supermarket Total 8,113 188 115 303 248 269 517 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
New Pad Building - Retail 3,126 SF 170 4 3 7 11 10 21
Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (17) 000 (4) (4) (8)
New Pad Building - Retail Total 153 4 3 7 7 6 13
New Pad Building - Fast-Food Restaurant w/o Drive-Thru 1,875 SF 845 47 34 81 31 31 62 Pass-By Trip Reduction [d] (85) (5) (3) (8) (13) (13) (26) New Pad Building - Fast-Food Restaurant w/o Drive-Thru Total 760 42 31 73 18 18 36 Project Trip Generation: 9,901 262 176 438 292 311 603

EXISTING SITE
Shopping Plaza without Supermarket 103,788 SF 7,008 112 68 180 264 275 539 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (701) (11) (7) (18) (106) (110) (216) Shopping Plaza without Supermarket Total 6,307 101 61 162 158 165 323 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
Existing Trip Generation: 7,182 129 88 217 177 183 360
NET PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 2,719 133 88 221 115 128 243 Proposed Project (blue) Minus Existing Site (green)
Notes:
[a] Source: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. [b]
[c]
[d] Given that the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition does not provide pass-by reduction factors for ITE Land Use 933: Fast-Food Restauant without Drive-Thru Window, pass-by reduction factors for ITE Land Use 932: High-Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurant were utilized, which has a weekday PM peak hour pass-by percentage of 43%. The weekday daily and AM peak hour pass-by percentages were estimated to be 10%. (trips/KSF)
Consistent with Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. Pass-by reductions for ITE Land Use 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) consist of the following: 10% weekday daily (estimated), 10% weekday AM (estimated), 40% weekday PM.

Given that the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition does not provide pass-by reduction factors for ITE Land Use 822: Strip Retail Plaza (<40k), pass-by reduction factors for ITE Land Use 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) were utilized, which has a weekday PM peak hour pass-by percentage of 40%. The weekday daily and AM peak hour pass-by percentages were estimated to be 10%.

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Unit / Size
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
13 TABLE 7
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION – OPTION 2A
LAND USE Daily In Out Total In Out Total
ITE TRIP RATES [a]
ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) with Supermarket 94.49 62% 38% 3.53 48% 52% 9.03 ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) without Supermarket 67.52 62% 38% 1.73 49% 51% 5.19 ITE LU 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 467.48 51% 49% 44.61 52% 48% 33.03

PROPOSED PROJECT
Shopping Plaza with Supermarket 98,958 SF 9,351 216 133 349 429 465 894 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (935) (22) (13) (35) (172) (186) (358) Shopping Plaza with Supermarket Total 8,416 194 120 314 257 279 536 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
New Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 2,500 SF 1,169 57 55 112 43 40 83 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (28) (57) (24) (22) (46) New Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window Total 877 28 27 55 19 18 37 Project Trip Generation: 10,168 250 174 424 295 315 610

EXISTING SITE
Shopping Plaza without Supermarket 103,788 SF 7,008 112 68 180 264 275 539 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (701) (11) (7) (18) (106) (110) (216) Shopping Plaza without Supermarket Total 6,307 101 61 162 158 165 323 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
Existing Trip Generation: 7,182 129 88 217 177 183 360
NET PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 2,986 121 86 207 118 132 250 Proposed Project (blue) Minus Existing Site (green)
Notes:
[a] Source: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. [b]
[c] Consistent with Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. Pass-by reductions for ITE Land Use 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window consist of the following: 25% weekday daily (estimated), 50% weekday AM, 55% weekday PM.

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Unit / Size
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
Consistent with Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. Pass-by reductions for ITE Land Use 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) consist of the following: 10% weekday daily (estimated), 10% weekday AM (estimated), 40% weekday PM.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
14 TABLE 8
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION – OPTION 2B
LAND USE Daily In Out Total In Out Total
ITE TRIP RATES [a]
ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) with Supermarket 94.49 62% 38% 3.53 48% 52% 9.03 ITE LU 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) without Supermarket 67.52 62% 38% 1.73 49% 51% 5.19 ITE LU 822: Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 54.45 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59 ITE LU 933: Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 450.49 58% 42% 43.18 50% 50% 33.21 ITE LU 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 467.48 51% 49% 44.61 52% 48% 33.03

PROPOSED PROJECT
Shopping Plaza with Supermarket 98,958 SF 9,351 216 133 349 429 465 894 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (935) (22) (13) (35) (172) (186) (358) Shopping Plaza with Supermarket Total 8,416 194 120 314 257 279 536 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
New Pad Building - Retail 3,126 SF 170 4 3 7 11 10 21
Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (17) 000 (4) (4) (8)
New Pad Building - Retail Total 153 4 3 7 7 6 13
New Pad Building - Fast-Food Restaurant w/o Drive-Thru 1,875 SF 845 47 34 81 31 31 62 Pass-By Trip Reduction [d] (85) (5) (3) (8) (13) (13) (26) New Pad Building - Fast-Food Restaurant w/o Drive-Thru Total 760 42 31 73 18 18 36 Project Trip Generation: 10,204 268 181 449 301 321 622

EXISTING SITE
Shopping Plaza without Supermarket 103,788 SF 7,008 112 68 180 264 275 539 Pass-By Trip Reduction [b] (701) (11) (7) (18) (106) (110) (216) Shopping Plaza without Supermarket Total 6,307 101 61 162 158 165 323 Carl's Jr. Restaurant 2,497 SF 1,167 57 54 111 43 39 82 Pass-By Trip Reduction [c] (292) (29) (27) (56) (24) (21) (45) Carl's Jr. Restaurant Total 875 28 27 55 19 18 37
Existing Trip Generation: 7,182 129 88 217 177 183 360
NET PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 3,022 139 93 232 124 138 262 Proposed Project (blue) Minus Existing Site (green)
Notes:
[a] Source: Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. [b]
[c]
[d]
Unit / Size
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Consistent with Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition , Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2021)]. Pass-by reductions for ITE Land Use 821: Shopping Plaza (40-150k) consist of the following: 10% weekday daily (estimated), 10% weekday AM (estimated), 40% weekday PM.

Given that the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition does not provide pass-by reduction factors for ITE Land Use 933: Fast-Food Restauant without Drive-Thru Window, pass-by reduction factors for ITE Land Use 932: High-Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurant were utilized, which has a weekday PM peak hour pass-by percentage of 43%. The weekday daily and AM peak hour pass-by percentages were estimated to be 10%. (trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)
(trips/KSF)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
15 Because of the retail and fast-food restaurant components of the Project, “pass-by” reductions were applied to retail and fast-food-generated trips. This is typically done to account for conditions when the total number of trips generated by a retail or fast-food-oriented development is not entirely new to the external street system. Shopping centers and restaurants, which are located along major/busy roadways, attract a portion of their trips from traffic already on the street system for a different purpose (i.e., the retail or fast-food site is not the primary or ultimate destination). These trips do not add new traffic to the surrounding street system. The methodology used in estimating pass-by trips is also contained in ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook.

As shown in Table 5, Option 1A net-generated trips are estimated to be 2,683 weekday trips, 196 AM peak hour trips, and 231 PM peak hour trips. Table 6 indicates that Option 1B net-generated trips are estimated to be 2,719 weekday daily trips, 221 AM peak hour trips, and 243 PM peak hour trips (greater than Option 1A during each time period).

As shown in Table 7, Option 2A net-generated trips are estimated to be 2,986 weekday trips, 207 AM peak hour trips, and 250 PM peak hour trips. Table 8 indicates that Option 2B net-generated trips are estimated to be 3,022 weekday daily trips, 232 AM peak hour trips, and 262 PM peak hour trips (greater than Option 2A during each time period).

4.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment
The geographic distribution of traffic generated by developments such as the Project is dependent upon the following factors:
 the Project’s market/service area
 location of site access points in relation to the surrounding street system  location of parking areas, and ingress/egress availability at the parking areas  the site's proximity to major traffic carriers and regional access routes  physical characteristics of the circulation system such as lane channelization and presence of traffic signals that affect travel patterns  presence of traffic congestion in the surrounding vicinity Based on these considerations, a Project trip distribution pattern was developed and presented on Figure 9. The incremental traffic expected to be generated by the Project was assigned to the local street network using Project distribution pattern illustrated in Figure 9.

4.2.1 Project-Generated Traffic Volumes
Figures 10 through 17 present the Project-generated traffic volumes at the 12 key intersections under Option 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The volumes presented in Figures 10 through 17 represent the net project trips.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
16 4.3 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Volumes
Figures 18 through 25 present the Existing (2022) Plus Project traffic volumes at the 12 key intersections under Option 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively.

4.4 Year 2024 Cumulative Base
The Cumulative Base or “background” traffic projections account for existing traffic volumes, and include two growth elements over existing traffic volumes: (1) increase in the existing traffic volumes due to overall regional growth; and, (2) traffic generated by specific developments expected to be constructed by Year 2024 in the vicinity of the Project study area. The following sections describe these two growth elements in existing traffic volumes.

No physical, capacity-enhancing improvements to intersection geometry or roadway segments have been assumed under Year 2024 Cumulative Base conditions because no transportation system projects within the study area are expected to be fully developed/completed by Year 2024.

4.4.1 Ambient Growth
The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future related projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. The Year 2024 background traffic volumes were estimated based on a 1% annual growth rate (based on other traffic studies completed in the City), corresponding to a total adjustment of 2% from 2022 conditions.

4.4.2 Cumulative Projects
The traffic expected to be generated by future projects that are either under construction or proposed within the study area accounts for the second element of the Year 2024 Cumulative Base scenario. Tables 9 and 10 present the list of three cumulative projects, and their trip generation potential, respectively. Figure 26 shows the locations of these related projects. The list of cumulative projects was developed in conjunction with City staff, and verified with City staff that there are no other development projects identified in the foreseeable future that would affect traffic forecasts in this study.

4.4.3 Year 2024 Cumulative Base Traffic Volumes
Figures 27 and 28 present the Year 2024 Cumulative Base traffic volumes at the 12 key intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively.

4.5 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volumes
Figures 29 through 36 illustrate the Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project traffic volumes at the 12 key intersections under Option 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
17 TABLE 9
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS4
No. Description Location/Address Size
City of Laguna Hills

1. Circle K 25491 Alicia Parkway
Demolish Existing:
2,100 SF Auto Repair Shop with 8 VFP Gas Station
Construct:
5,200 SF Convenience Store with 10 VFP Gas Station

2. MemorialCare Saddleback
Women’s Health Pavilion 24401 Calle de Louisa 41,805 SF Medical Office Building

3. 24888 Alicia Parkway
Commercial Project 24888 Alicia Parkway
2,500 Taco Bell Restaurant with Drive-Thru
2,175 SF Starbucks with Drive-Thru
2,503 SF Plant Power Restaurant with Drive-Thru

4. ActivCare 24888 Alicia parkway 72 Bed Elderly Care Housing 4 Source: Cities of Laguna Hills, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, and Aliso Viejo Planning Departments.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 18
TABLE 10
CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION FORECAST5
Cumulative Project Description
Daily
2-Way
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total

1. Circle K 896 39 39 78 26 26 52

2. MemorialCare Saddleback Women’s Health Pavilion 1,505 103 27 130 49 115 164

3. 24888 Alicia Parkway Commercial Project6 3,105 102 98 200 77 75 152

4. ActivCare7 187 9 5 14 7 12 19
Cumulative Projects Trip Generation Forecast 5,693 253 169 422 159 228 387 5 Source: Trip Generation, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington D.C. (2021), unless otherwise noted. 6 Source: 24888 Alicia Parkway Commercial Project Revised TIA, prepared by LLG Engineers, dated September 2020. 7 Source: ActivCare Laguna Hills Trip Generation Evaluation, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated January 2019.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 19

5.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
The potential impact of the Project’s incremental trips under each development scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the 12 key intersections, without, then with, the Project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the delay/volume-tocapacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection. The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the significant traffic impact criteria described below.

5.1 Significant Impact Criteria
Based on the Cities of Laguna Hills and Mission Viejo traffic study guidelines, a project is considered to have a significant impact at an intersection if the Project causes an intersection at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or F, and the ICU increase attributable to the Project is 0.01 or greater (or any delay increase per HCM 6).

For Caltrans freeway ramp intersections, a project is considered to have a significant impact if the Project causes an intersection at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or F, or, if an intersection is operating at LOS E or F without the project, and the project causes any delay increase.

5.2 Existing (2022) Plus Project Traffic Conditions
Tables 11 through 14 summarize the Existing (2022) Plus Project levels of service at the 12 study intersections under each development scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Based on the application of the performance criteria described previously, the Project is not expected to cause significant traffic impacts at any of the 12 key intersections under Existing (2022) Plus Project conditions.

5.3 Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Tables 15 through 18 present the Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project levels of service at the 12 study intersections under each development scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Based on the application of the performance criteria described previously, the Project is not expected to cause significant traffic impacts at any of the 12 key intersections under Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project conditions.

5.4 Caltrans Queuing Analysis
The Caltrans Interim Land Development and Intergovernmental Review (LDIGR) Safety Review Practitioners Guidance, dated July 2020, provides direction on a simplified safety analysis approach that reduces the risk to all road users and that focuses on multi-modal conflict analysis as well as access management issues. District traffic safety staff are encouraged to consider the proposed Project’s potential influence on safety on state roadways, including the following factors:
 Increased presence of pedestrians and bicyclists
 Degradation of the walking and bicycling environment and experience

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 20
TABLE 11
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 1A ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.483 -- A No 0.505 -- A No 0.022 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.580 -- A No 0.630 -- B No 0.050 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.0 C No -- 21.1 C No 2.1 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 23.3 C No -- 30.6 D No 7.3 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.5 C No -- 21.5 C No 2.0 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.0 C No -- 29.5 D No 3.5 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.4 B No 0.7 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.5 B No -- 11.7 B No 1.2 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.0 B No -- 14.1 B No 2.1 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 15.6 C No -- 20.7 C No 5.1 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.583 -- A No 0.597 -- A No 0.014 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.504 -- A No 0.518 -- A No 0.014 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.560 -- A No 0.568 -- A No 0.008 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.459 -- A No 0.472 -- A No 0.013 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.571 -- A No 0.578 -- A No 0.007 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.572 -- A No 0.578 -- A No 0.006 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.920 -- E Yes 0.925 -- E Yes 0.005 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.958 -- E Yes 0.966 -- E Yes 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 34.2 C No -- 36.0 D No 1.8 No
PM -- 44.7 D No -- 46.2 D No 1.5 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.602 -- B No 0.606 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.737 -- C No 0.744 -- C No 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 13.3 B No -- 13.8 B No 0.5 No
PM -- 22.7 C No -- 22.9 C No 0.2 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.605 -- B No 0.610 -- B No 0.005 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.640 -- B No 0.645 -- B No 0.005 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.763 -- C No 0.771 -- C No 0.008 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.789 -- C No 0.796 -- C No 0.007 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

Poor
LOS
? ICU
Poor
LOS
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) ?
Peak
Hour LOS LOS
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022)
ICU
Project
Impact?
Plus Project Option 1A
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 21
TABLE 12
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 1B ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.483 -- A No 0.508 -- A No 0.025 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.580 -- A No 0.632 -- B No 0.052 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.0 C No -- 20.8 C No 1.9 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 23.3 C No -- 30.3 D No 7.1 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.5 C No -- 23.5 C No 4.0 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.0 C No -- 27.3 D No 1.3 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.4 B No 0.7 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.5 B No -- 11.7 B No 1.2 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.0 B No -- 14.1 B No 2.1 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 15.6 C No -- 20.8 C No 5.2 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.583 -- A No 0.599 -- A No 0.016 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.504 -- A No 0.519 -- A No 0.015 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.560 -- A No 0.569 -- A No 0.009 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.459 -- A No 0.473 -- A No 0.014 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.571 -- A No 0.579 -- A No 0.008 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.572 -- A No 0.579 -- A No 0.007 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.920 -- E Yes 0.925 -- E Yes 0.005 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.958 -- E Yes 0.966 -- E Yes 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 34.2 C No -- 36.2 D No 2.0 No
PM -- 44.7 D No -- 46.4 D No 1.7 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.602 -- B No 0.606 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.737 -- C No 0.744 -- C No 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 13.3 B No -- 13.8 B No 0.5 No
PM -- 22.7 C No -- 23.3 C No 0.6 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.605 -- B No 0.611 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.640 -- B No 0.646 -- B No 0.006 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.763 -- C No 0.772 -- C No 0.009 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.789 -- C No 0.797 -- C No 0.008 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

LOS
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)
Poor
LOS
?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 1B

ICU LOS
Poor
LOS
? ICU

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 22
TABLE 13
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 2A ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.483 -- A No 0.507 -- A No 0.024 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.580 -- A No 0.634 -- B No 0.054 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.0 C No -- 21.2 C No 2.2 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 23.3 C No -- 31.4 D No 8.1 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.5 C No -- 22.7 C No 3.2 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.0 C No -- 28.1 D No 2.1 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.4 B No 0.7 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.5 B No -- 11.8 B No 1.3 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.0 B No -- 14.2 B No 2.2 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 15.6 C No -- 21.3 C No 5.7 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.583 -- A No 0.597 -- A No 0.014 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.504 -- A No 0.520 -- A No 0.016 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.560 -- A No 0.568 -- A No 0.008 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.459 -- A No 0.474 -- A No 0.015 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.571 -- A No 0.578 -- A No 0.007 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.572 -- A No 0.579 -- A No 0.007 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.920 -- E Yes 0.925 -- E Yes 0.005 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.958 -- E Yes 0.966 -- E Yes 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 34.2 C No -- 36.1 D No 1.9 No
PM -- 44.7 D No -- 46.5 D No 1.8 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.602 -- B No 0.606 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.737 -- C No 0.744 -- C No 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 13.3 B No -- 13.8 B No 0.5 No
PM -- 22.7 C No -- 23.4 C No 0.7 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.605 -- B No 0.611 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.640 -- B No 0.646 -- B No 0.006 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.763 -- C No 0.771 -- C No 0.008 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.789 -- C No 0.797 -- C No 0.008 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

LOS
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)
Poor
LOS
?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 2A

ICU LOS
Poor
LOS
? ICU

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 23
TABLE 14
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 2B ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.483 -- A No 0.510 -- A No 0.027 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.580 -- A No 0.636 -- B No 0.056 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.0 C No -- 20.9 C No 2.0 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 23.3 C No -- 31.2 D No 7.9 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 19.5 C No -- 21.4 C No 1.9 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.0 C No -- 30.0 D No 4.0 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.4 B No 0.7 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.5 B No -- 11.8 B No 1.3 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.0 B No -- 14.2 B No 2.2 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 15.6 C No -- 21.2 C No 5.6 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.583 -- A No 0.600 -- B No 0.017 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.504 -- A No 0.520 -- A No 0.016 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.560 -- A No 0.570 -- A No 0.010 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.459 -- A No 0.475 -- A No 0.016 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.571 -- A No 0.579 -- A No 0.008 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.572 -- A No 0.579 -- A No 0.007 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.920 -- E Yes 0.926 -- E Yes 0.006 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.958 -- E Yes 0.967 -- E Yes 0.009 No HCM: AM -- 34.2 C No -- 36.3 D No 2.1 No
PM -- 44.7 D No -- 46.6 D No 1.9 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.602 -- B No 0.606 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.737 -- C No 0.745 -- C No 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 13.3 B No -- 13.8 B No 0.5 No
PM -- 22.7 C No -- 23.4 C No 0.7 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.605 -- B No 0.611 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.640 -- B No 0.646 -- B No 0.006 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.763 -- C No 0.772 -- C No 0.009 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.789 -- C No 0.797 -- C No 0.008 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

LOS
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)
Poor
LOS
?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 2B

ICU LOS
Poor
LOS
? ICU

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 24
TABLE 15
YEAR 2024 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 1A ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.592 -- A No 0.607 -- B No 0.015 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.608 -- B No 0.658 -- B No 0.050 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 20.1 C No -- 22.5 C No 2.5 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 24.8 C No -- 33.5 D No 8.7 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 18.7 C No -- 22.4 C No 3.7 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.5 C No -- 30.3 D No 3.8 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.4 B No 0.7 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.6 B No -- 11.7 B No 1.1 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.2 B No -- 14.5 B No 2.3 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 16.0 C No -- 21.4 C No 5.4 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.614 -- B No 0.628 -- B No 0.014 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.529 -- A No 0.544 -- A No 0.015 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.585 -- A No 0.593 -- A No 0.008 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.481 -- A No 0.494 -- A No 0.013 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.612 -- B No 0.620 -- B No 0.008 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.603 -- B No 0.610 -- B No 0.007 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.945 -- E Yes 0.950 -- E Yes 0.005 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.983 -- E Yes 0.990 -- E Yes 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 40.8 D No -- 42.1 D No 1.3 No
PM -- 48.5 D No -- 51.3 D No 2.8 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.621 -- B No 0.625 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.758 -- C No 0.764 -- C No 0.006 No HCM: AM -- 14.9 B No -- 15.0 B No 0.1 No
PM -- 23.3 C No -- 24.2 C No 0.9 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.630 -- B No 0.636 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.660 -- B No 0.667 -- B No 0.007 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.786 -- C No 0.794 -- C No 0.008 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.811 -- D No 0.818 -- D No 0.007 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

ICU
Poor
LOS
LOS LOS ?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base Cumulative Plus Project Option 1A
ICU
Poor
LOS
?
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 25
TABLE 16
YEAR 2024 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 1B ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.592 -- A No 0.606 -- B No 0.014 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.608 -- B No 0.660 -- B No 0.052 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 20.1 C No -- 22.2 C No 2.2 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 24.8 C No -- 33.2 D No 8.4 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 18.7 C No -- 23.4 C No 4.7 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.5 C No -- 32.4 D No 5.9 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.5 B No 0.8 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.6 B No -- 11.8 B No 1.2 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.2 B No -- 14.4 B No 2.2 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 16.0 C No -- 21.5 C No 5.5 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.614 -- B No 0.630 -- B No 0.016 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.529 -- A No 0.545 -- A No 0.016 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.585 -- A No 0.594 -- A No 0.009 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.481 -- A No 0.495 -- A No 0.014 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.612 -- B No 0.621 -- B No 0.009 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.603 -- B No 0.611 -- B No 0.008 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.945 -- E Yes 0.950 -- E Yes 0.005 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.983 -- E Yes 0.991 -- E Yes 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 40.8 D No -- 42.2 D No 1.4 No
PM -- 48.5 D No -- 51.5 D No 3.0 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.621 -- B No 0.625 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.758 -- C No 0.765 -- C No 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 14.9 B No -- 15.0 B No 0.1 No
PM -- 23.3 C No -- 24.2 C No 0.9 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.630 -- B No 0.636 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.660 -- B No 0.668 -- B No 0.008 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.786 -- C No 0.795 -- C No 0.009 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.811 -- D No 0.820 -- D No 0.009 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

LOS
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)
Poor
LOS
?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base Cumulative Plus Project Option 1B

ICU LOS
Poor
LOS
? ICU

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 26
TABLE 17
YEAR 2024 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 2A ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.592 -- A No 0.608 -- B No 0.016 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.608 -- B No 0.662 -- B No 0.054 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 20.1 C No -- 22.7 C No 2.6 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 24.8 C No -- 34.5 D No 9.7 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 18.7 C No -- 23.9 C No 5.2 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.5 C No -- 33.4 D No 6.9 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.5 B No 0.8 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.6 B No -- 11.8 B No 1.2 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.2 B No -- 14.5 B No 2.3 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 16.0 C No -- 22.0 C No 6.0 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.614 -- B No 0.628 -- B No 0.014 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.529 -- A No 0.546 -- A No 0.017 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.585 -- A No 0.593 -- A No 0.008 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.481 -- A No 0.496 -- A No 0.015 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.612 -- B No 0.620 -- B No 0.008 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.603 -- B No 0.612 -- B No 0.009 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.945 -- E Yes 0.950 -- E Yes 0.005 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.983 -- E Yes 0.991 -- E Yes 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 40.8 D No -- 42.1 D No 1.3 No
PM -- 48.5 D No -- 51.6 D No 3.1 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.621 -- B No 0.625 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.758 -- C No 0.765 -- C No 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 14.9 B No -- 15.0 B No 0.1 No
PM -- 23.3 C No -- 24.2 C No 0.9 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.630 -- B No 0.636 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.660 -- B No 0.668 -- B No 0.008 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.786 -- C No 0.794 -- C No 0.008 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.811 -- D No 0.819 -- D No 0.008 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

LOS
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)
Poor
LOS
?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base Cumulative Plus Project Option 2A

ICU LOS
Poor
LOS
? ICU

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 27
TABLE 18
YEAR 2024 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE: OPTION 2B ICU
or
Delay
Diff
1) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.592 -- A No 0.607 -- B No 0.015 No Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.608 -- B No 0.664 -- B No 0.056 No 2) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 20.1 C No -- 22.4 C No 2.3 No Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM -- 24.8 C No -- 34.2 D No 9.4 No 3) Alicia Parkway at AM -- 18.7 C No -- 25.0 C No 6.3 No Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)[a] PM -- 26.5 C No -- 31.3 D No 4.8 No 4) Project Driveway #3 at AM -- 9.7 A No -- 10.5 B No 0.8 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 10.6 B No -- 11.9 B No 1.3 No 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM -- 12.2 B No -- 14.5 B No 2.3 No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM -- 16.0 C No -- 22.0 C No 6.0 No 6) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.614 -- B No 0.631 -- B No 0.017 No Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) PM 0.529 -- A No 0.546 -- A No 0.017 No 7) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.585 -- A No 0.594 -- A No 0.009 No Wilkes Place (Laguna Hills) PM 0.481 -- A No 0.497 -- A No 0.016 No 8) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.612 -- B No 0.621 -- B No 0.009 No Paseo de Valencia (Laguna Hills) PM 0.603 -- B No 0.612 -- B No 0.009 No 9) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.945 -- E Yes 0.951 -- E Yes 0.006 No I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills) PM 0.983 -- E Yes 0.991 -- E Yes 0.008 No HCM: AM -- 40.8 D No -- 42.3 D No 1.5 No
PM -- 48.5 D No -- 51.8 D No 3.3 No
10) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.621 -- B No 0.625 -- B No 0.004 No I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo) PM 0.758 -- C No 0.765 -- C No 0.007 No HCM: AM -- 14.9 B No -- 15.0 B No 0.1 No
PM -- 23.3 C No -- 24.3 C No 1.0 No
11) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.630 -- B No 0.636 -- B No 0.006 No Charlinda Drive (Mission Viejo) PM 0.660 -- B No 0.668 -- B No 0.008 No 12) Alicia Parkway at AM 0.786 -- C No 0.795 -- C No 0.009 No Muirlands Boulevard (Mission Viejo) PM 0.811 -- D No 0.819 -- D No 0.008 No Notes:

Italicized text corresponds to an unsignalized/stop-controlled intersection. s/v = seconds per vehicle
[a] The delay reported is based on Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic analysis.

LOS
Delay
(s/v)
Delay
(s/v)
Poor
LOS
?
Project
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) Impact?
Peak
Hour
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base Cumulative Plus Project Option 2B

ICU LOS
Poor
LOS
? ICU

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 28
 New pedestrian and bicyclist connection desires
 Multimodal conflict points, especially at intersections and project access locations  Change in traffic mix such as an increase in bicyclists or pedestrians where features such as shoulders or sidewalks may not exist or are inconsistent with facility design (sidewalks, bike and multi-user paths, multimodal roadways, etc.)
 Increased vehicular speeds
 Transition between free flow and metered flow
 Increased traffic volumes
 Queuing at off-ramps resulting in slow or stopped traffic on the mainline or speed differentials between adjacent lanes
 Queuing exceeding turn pocket length that impedes through-traffic The proposed Project does not take direct access from a State facility; however, an evaluation of the Project’s potential impacts on queuing at Caltrans intersections was prepared in order to determine if the Project would cause, or contribute towards, slowing or stopped traffic on freeway mainline travel lanes, off-ramps, and State highway lanes that could result in unsafe speed differentials between adjacent lanes.

Caltrans queueing analysis was conducted using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) operational method for signalized intersections. The corresponding HCM worksheets for purposes of determining the 95th percentile vehicle queues are contained in Appendix B.

Tables 19 through 26 present the results of the Caltrans queuing analysis prepared for Existing plus Project and Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions under each development scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Each queuing table reports the 95th percentile queues, which represent the maximum back of vehicle queues with 95th percentile traffic volumes. The corresponding maximum vehicle queue lengths were then compared to the queue storage lengths. As Tables 19 through 26 indicate, adequate queue storage lengths are provided to accommodate the 95th percentile queues for movements affected by the Project. Based on this, it is concluded that development of the Project under any scenario would not result in adverse queuing conditions at Caltrans intersections.

6.0 INTERNAL CIRCULATION AND SITE ACCESS

6.1.1 Internal Circulation
On-site circulation aspects of the Project (i.e., driveway and internal roadway orientation, residential building layout, parking configuration, parking accessibility, pedestrian and bicycle connections on site and with surrounding uses, bus stop locations and accessibility to public transit, passenger loading/unloading locations, delivery/service operations and expected drop-off/pick-up travel routes) were reviewed and concluded to be adequate.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 29
TABLE 19
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 1A 9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 762 Yes 1,065 Yes 812 Yes 1,100 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 567 Yes 631 Yes 632 Yes 674 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 106 Yes 195 Yes 130 Yes 209 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 375 Yes 591 Yes 392 Yes 591 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections Plus Project Option 1A
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (Yes/No)
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 30
TABLE 20
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 1B 9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 762 Yes 1,065 Yes 817 Yes 1,100 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 567 Yes 631 Yes 641 Yes 676 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 106 Yes 195 Yes 133 Yes 211 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 375 Yes 591 Yes 392 Yes 609 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022)
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Plus Project Option 1B
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 31
TABLE 21
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 2A 9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 762 Yes 1,065 Yes 812 Yes 1,100 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 567 Yes 631 Yes 634 Yes 678 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 106 Yes 195 Yes 131 Yes 211 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 375 Yes 591 Yes 392 Yes 609 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022)
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Plus Project Option 2A
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 32
TABLE 22
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 2B 9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 762 Yes 1,065 Yes 817 Yes 1,100 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 567 Yes 631 Yes 642 Yes 680 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 106 Yes 195 Yes 134 Yes 212 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 375 Yes 591 Yes 392 Yes 609 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022)
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Plus Project Option 2B
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 33
TABLE 23
YEAR 2024 CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 1A
9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 945 Yes 1,149 Yes 966 Yes 1,204 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 712 Yes 666 Yes 765 Yes 736 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 138 Yes 196 Yes 158 Yes 218 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 433 Yes 589 Yes 432 Yes 619 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Cumulative Plus Project Option 1A
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 34
TABLE 24
YEAR 2024 CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 1B
9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 945 Yes 1,149 Yes 973 Yes 1,204 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 712 Yes 666 Yes 777 Yes 738 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 138 Yes 196 Yes 161 Yes 219 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 433 Yes 589 Yes 432 Yes 619 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Cumulative Plus Project Option 1B
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 35
TABLE 25
YEAR 2024 CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 2A
9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 945 Yes 1,149 Yes 973 Yes 1,204 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 712 Yes 666 Yes 772 Yes 740 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 138 Yes 196 Yes 159 Yes 220 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 433 Yes 589 Yes 432 Yes 619 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Cumulative Plus Project Option 2A
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 36
TABLE 26
YEAR 2024 CALTRANS QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 2B
9) Alicia Parkway at
I-5 SB Ramps (Caltrans/Laguna Hills)
Southbound Left-Turn 1,490 945 Yes 1,149 Yes 972 Yes 1,204 Yes Southbound Right-Turn 1,490 712 Yes 666 Yes 779 Yes 743 Yes 10)Alicia Parkway at
I-5 NB Ramps (Caltrans/Mission Viejo)
Northbound Left-Turn 350 138 Yes 196 Yes 162 Yes 221 Yes Northbound Right-Turn 1,390 433 Yes 589 Yes 432 Yes 619 Yes Notes:[a] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Cumulative Plus Project Option 2B
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 37
TABLE 27
YEAR 2024 PROJECT DRIVEWAY QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 1A 1) Alicia Parkway at
Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) [d]
Eastbound Left-Turn 135 68 Yes 103 Yes 98 Yes 132 Yes
2) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 170 26 Yes 44 Yes 55 Yes 63 Yes
Westbound Through/Right-Turn 195 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 3) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 115 38 Yes 76 Yes 48 Yes 87 Yes
Eastbound Left-Turn 105 45 Yes 93 Yes 83 Yes 132 No [b] Westbound Right-Turn 115 6 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 65 25 Yes 29 Yes 28 Yes 46 Yes
Southbound Through/Right-Turn 180 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 52 39 Yes 54 No [c] 48 Yes 75 No [c] 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 135 25 Yes 25 Yes 36 Yes 46 Yes Southbound Through/Right-Turn 210 25 Yes 66 Yes 32 Yes 148 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 25 41 No [c] 56 No [c] 48 No [c] 95 No [c] 6) Alicia Parkway at
Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) [d]
Westbound Left-Turn 120 94 Yes 95 Yes 93 Yes 101 Yes
Notes:[a] Unless otherwise reported, queue is based on Synchro 11.0 SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane[b] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, Figure 37 illustrates proposed improvements that would provide additional storage length to fully accommodate the queue.
[c] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, it occurs on site and not on a public street. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers familiar with this worst-case condition. Based on this, peak queue operations may be adverse but would not need to be addressed. [d] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections.

Study Intersections (Jurisdiction)
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Cumulative Plus Project Option 1A
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 38
TABLE 28
YEAR 2024 PROJECT DRIVEWAY QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 1B 1) Alicia Parkway at
Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) [d]
Eastbound Left-Turn 135 68 Yes 103 Yes 102 Yes 133 Yes
2) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 170 26 Yes 44 Yes 48 Yes 56 Yes
Westbound Through/Right-Turn 195 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 3) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 115 38 Yes 76 Yes 45 Yes 91 Yes
Eastbound Left-Turn 105 45 Yes 93 Yes 88 Yes 132 No [b] Westbound Right-Turn 115 6 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 65 25 Yes 29 Yes 24 Yes 50 Yes
Southbound Through/Right-Turn 180 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 52 39 Yes 54 No [c] 48 Yes 80 No [c] 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 135 25 Yes 25 Yes 39 Yes 54 Yes Southbound Through/Right-Turn 210 25 Yes 66 Yes 35 Yes 154 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 25 41 No [c] 56 No [c] 50 No [c] 114 No [c] 6) Alicia Parkway at
Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) [d]
Westbound Left-Turn 120 94 Yes 95 Yes 93 Yes 101 Yes
Notes:[a] Unless otherwise reported, queue is based on Synchro 11.0 SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane[b] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, Figure 37 illustrates proposed improvements that would provide additional storage length to fully accommodate the queue.
[c] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, it occurs on site and not on a public street. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers familiar with this worst-case condition. Based on this, peak queue operations may be adverse but would not need to be addressed. [d] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections.

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) (feet) [a]
Estimated
Storage
Provided
(feet)
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Queue
(feet) [a]
Adequate
Storage
(Yes/No)
Cumulative Plus Project Option 1B
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 39
TABLE 29
YEAR 2024 PROJECT DRIVEWAY QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 2A 1) Alicia Parkway at
Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) [d]
Eastbound Left-Turn 135 68 Yes 103 Yes 104 Yes 135 Yes
2) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 170 26 Yes 44 Yes 51 Yes 58 Yes
Westbound Through/Right-Turn 195 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 3) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 115 38 Yes 76 Yes 51 Yes 97 Yes
Eastbound Left-Turn 105 45 Yes 93 Yes 95 Yes 135 No [b] Westbound Right-Turn 115 6 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 65 25 Yes 29 Yes 30 Yes 53 Yes
Southbound Through/Right-Turn 180 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 52 39 Yes 54 No [c] 51 Yes 73 No [c] 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 135 25 Yes 25 Yes 32 Yes 49 Yes Southbound Through/Right-Turn 210 25 Yes 66 Yes 30 Yes 157 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 25 41 No [c] 56 No [c] 49 No [c] 119 No [c] 6) Alicia Parkway at
Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) [d]
Westbound Left-Turn 120 94 Yes 95 Yes 104 Yes 102 Yes
Notes:[a] Unless otherwise reported, queue is based on Synchro 11.0 SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane[b] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, Figure 37 illustrates proposed improvements that would provide additional storage length to fully accommodate the queue.
[c] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, it occurs on site and not on a public street. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers familiar with this worst-case condition. Based on this, peak queue operations may be adverse but would not need to be addressed. [d] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 40
TABLE 30
YEAR 2024 PROJECT DRIVEWAY QUEUEING ANALYSIS: OPTION 2B 1) Alicia Parkway at
Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia (Laguna Hills) [d]
Eastbound Left-Turn 135 68 Yes 103 Yes 103 Yes 135 Yes
2) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 170 26 Yes 44 Yes 49 Yes 65 Yes
Westbound Through/Right-Turn 195 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 3) Alicia Parkway at
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills)
Southbound Right-Turn 115 38 Yes 76 Yes 47 Yes 94 Yes
Eastbound Left-Turn 105 45 Yes 93 Yes 73 Yes 123 No [b] Westbound Right-Turn 115 6 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 65 25 Yes 29 Yes 33 Yes 58 Yes
Southbound Through/Right-Turn 180 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes 25 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 52 39 Yes 54 No [c] 44 Yes 70 No [c] 5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills)
Northbound Left/Through 135 25 Yes 25 Yes 41 Yes 42 Yes Southbound Through/Right-Turn 210 25 Yes 66 Yes 43 Yes 131 Yes Eastbound Left/Right-Turn 25 41 No [c] 56 No [c] 51 No [c] 81 No [c] 6) Alicia Parkway at
Costeau Street (Laguna Hills) [d]
Westbound Left-Turn 120 94 Yes 95 Yes 94 Yes 102 Yes
Notes:[a] Unless otherwise reported, queue is based on Synchro 11.0 SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane[b] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, Figure 37 illustrates proposed improvements that would provide additional storage length to fully accommodate the queue.
[c] Although the reported queue exceeds the storage length provided, it occurs on site and not on a public street. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers familiar with this worst-case condition. Based on this, peak queue operations may be adverse but would not need to be addressed. [d] Queue is based on the 95th Percentile Queue and is reported in total queue length (feet) per lane for signalized intersections.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 41

6.1.2 Site Access Queuing Analysis
Detailed traffic operational queuing analysis at all of the Project driveway intersections, Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/paseo de Alicia, and Alicia Parkway at Cousteau Street, was conducted.

Tables 27 through 30 present the site access queuing results under Year 2024 Cumulative Base and Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project conditions and presuming each development scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively.

Excessive left-turn or right-turn vehicle queuing which extends into and/or blocks adjacent through travel lanes may have detrimental effects on intersection operations and the public roadway network as a whole in ways not otherwise accounted for by the ICU methodology; therefore, vehicle queuing assessment was performed for all Project driveway intersections, the eastbound left-turn at Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia, and the westbound left-turn at Alicia Parkway at Cousteau Street.

The queuing analysis was prepared utilizing the Synchro 11.0 Simtraffic and/or the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 95th Percentile methodology, which considers traffic volume data, lane configurations, and traffic control/stop signs in order to calculate the 95th percentile queues for the respective traffic movements. The 95th percentile queue represents the maximum back of vehicle queue with 95th percentile traffic volumes (i.e., actual traffic volumes will exceed the 95th percentile volumes 5 percent of the time), which is a very conservative standard. A minimum vehicle length of 25 feet is assumed for purposes of this analysis. Appendix E contains the corresponding queueing worksheets.

Tables 27 through 30 indicate that there would be adequate storage for the eastbound left-turn at Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia, and the westbound left-turn at Alicia Parkway at Cousteau Street, and the inbound/outbound movements at each of these site access points under Year 2024 conditions, with a few exceptions described below during the peak hour noted. In other words, the existing storage lengths and/or driveway “throat” lengths would be adequate in fully accommodating the 95th percentile queues forecasted during the AM and PM peak hours.

The queuing results for the eastbound left-turn movement at Project Driveway #2 (from eastbound Alicia Parkway entering the Project site), and the outbound movements at Project Driveways #3 and #4 (exiting the Project site onto Hon Avenue), indicate that the 95th percentile queues would exceed existing queue storage lengths.

To address the queue storage deficiency at the Project Driveway #2 and Alicia Parkway intersection (left-turns from eastbound Alicia Parkway entering the Project site) during the PM peak hour, eastbound left-turn pocket and median improvements along Alicia Parkway are proposed, as illustrated on the Figure 37 conceptual plan. As shown, the existing eastbound left-turn pocket on Alicia Parkway will be extended to provide a queue storage length of 135 feet in order to fully accommodate 95th percentile queues entering the Project site that range between 123 feet (under Option 2B) and 135 feet (under Option 2A).

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 42
Related to the queue storage deficiencies reported in Tables 27 through 30 for the outbound/exiting movements from the Project site onto Hon Avenue at Project Driveway #3 (during the PM peak hour) and at Project Driveway #4 (during the AM and PM peak hours), it should be noted that the 95th percentile queues occur on site, not on Hon Avenue, so Project-related queues do not impact traffic flows on any public street. The outbound queue storage lengths provided at each of these two driveways are constrained by the presence of the easternmost drive aisle for the Plaza (a site plan design necessity for adequate internal circulation and parking accessibility) and the existing driveway for the bank building pad (that is not a part of the Project) on the northwest corner of the Hon Avenue and Alicia Parkway intersection. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers often familiar with and able to anticipate typical peak queues occurring on site, and are able to self-regulate until queues dissipate at the exits (and exiting traffic flows from shopping centers tend to dissipate quickly because vehicle departures are more random and less directional/focused compared to outbound traffic from office buildings during the PM peak hour, for example). Based on these considerations, it is concluded that the outbound 95th percentile queues at Project Driveways #3 and #4 may be measurably adverse, but not considered significant to warrant any physical improvements.

6.1.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted at each of the four unsignalized Project driveway intersections. This assessment is made on the basis of signal warrant criteria adopted by Caltrans.

For this study, the need for signalization is assessed on the basis of a peak hour traffic signal warrant. Warrant #3 is described in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and has two parts: 1) Part A evaluates peak hour vehicle delay for traffic on the minor street approach with the highest delay and 2) Part B evaluates peak hour traffic volumes on the major and minor streets. This method provides an indication of whether peak hour traffic conditions or peak hour traffic volume levels are, or would be, sufficient to justify installation of a traffic signal.

Other traffic signal warrants are available; however, they cannot be checked under future conditions (without and with Project) because they rely on data for which forecasts are not available (such as accidents and four- or eight-hour vehicle volumes).

The decision to install a traffic signal should not be based purely on the warrants alone. Instead, the installation of a signal should be considered, but with further analysis and study performed (i.e., progression analysis, minimum distances between intersections, safety/stopping sight distance/line of sight assessment, corridor operations, etc.) when one or more of the warrants are satisfied.

Additionally, engineering judgment is exercised on a case-by-case basis to evaluate what effect a traffic signal will have on certain types of accidents and traffic conditions at the subject intersection, as well as at adjacent intersections. Appendix F contains the traffic signal warrant worksheets.

The results of the peak hour traffic signal warrant analysis are summarized in Tables 31 through 38 for all traffic scenarios and peak hours evaluated, respectively. The results indicate that the intersection of Project Driveway #2 with Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #3) will exceed the thresholds of Warrant #3, Part B (peak hour volumes) under Existing (2022) and Year 2024

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills 43
conditions with development of any scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2C). The installation of a traffic signal at this location is not recommended due to the intersection being in close proximity to

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 44 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 31
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 1A [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) 3 Satisfied?
Peak
Hour
Existing (2022)
Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Plus Project Option 1A
Existing (2022)

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 45 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 32
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 1B [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) 3 Satisfied?
Peak
Hour
Existing (2022)
Existing (2022) Plus Project Option 1B
Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 46 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 33
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 2A [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 47 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 34
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 2B [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 48 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 35
YEAR 2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 1A [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

Part B of Warrant
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) 3 Satisfied?
Peak
Hour
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base Cumulative Plus Project Option 1A
Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
3 Satisfied?

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 49 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 36
YEAR 2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 1B [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
3 Satisfied?
Part B of Warrant
Study Intersections (Jurisdiction) 3 Satisfied?
Peak
Hour
Year 2024 Year 2024
Cumulative Base Cumulative Plus Project Option 1B
Part A of Warrant
3 Satisfied?

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 50 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 37
YEAR 2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 2A [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 51 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 38
YEAR 2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: OPTION 2B [A] 2) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #1 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
3) Alicia Parkway at AM No No No No
Project Driveway #2 (Laguna Hills) PM No No No Yes
4) Project Driveway #3 at AM No No No No
Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
5) Project Driveway #4/Chevron Driveway at AM No No No No Hon Avenue (Laguna Hills) PM No No No No
Notes:[a] Signal warrant checks based on Warrant 3, Part A - Peak-Hour Delay Warrant and Part B - Peak-Hour Volume Warrant contained in the California MUTCD.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 52 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
the signalized intersection of Hon Avenue and Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #1), which is a distance of only 415 feet, and the signalized intersection of Costeau Street and Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #6), which is a distance of only 350 feet. Alicia Parkway is a primary arterial, and therefore requires a minimum of a ¼-mile spacing between signalized intersections. Additionally, it is not uncommon for minor streets at unsignalized intersections to experience longer delay due to the heavy volumes on the major street, especially during commute peak periods on weekdays and weekends.

6.1.4 Carl’s Jr. Drive-Through Lane Queuing Evaluation
A drive-through queuing evaluation was conducted for the existing Car’s Jr. fast-food restaurant component of the Project in order to determine if adequate queue storage length is provided at the existing drive-thru lane. Drive-thru queue observations were conducted in March 2022 on a typical weekday and Saturday between the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM, and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Appendix G contains the data from the queue observations.

Tables 39 and 40 summarize the Queue Frequency that was observed during weekday and Saturday peak periods, respectively. Table 39 indicates that on a typical weekday, an 85th and 95th percentile queue of approximately 2 vehicles, and a max queue of approximately 3 vehicles, were observed.

Table 40 indicates that on a Saturday, an 85th and 95th percentile queue of approximately 2 vehicles, and a max queue of approximately 4 vehicles, were observed. The existing drive-thru lane could accommodate approximately 6 vehicles; therefore, the observed queues were fully served by the existing queue storage length.

It should be noted that the fast-food restaurant with drive-thru proposed under Options 1A and 2A will provide a drive-thru lane queue storage length that could accommodate 15 vehicles, and would therefore be more than adequate in meeting drive-thru demand for the future fast-food restaurant.

Pursuant to City development requirements for the Project, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application will need to be prepared if either Option 1A or 2A is selected for implementation, which will include detailed evaluation of the proposed drive-thru facility.

7.0 CEQA ASSESSMENT OF VMT, ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION, & PUBLIC TRANSIT

7.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis
The purpose of this Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis is to evaluate the Project based on Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) requirements consistent with the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts In California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), December 2018, prepared by the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). The OPR Technical Advisory provides project screening criteria and guidance for analysis of VMT assessments under SB 743. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled. Lead agencies are allowed to continue using their current impact criteria, or to opt into the revised transportation guidelines. However, the new guidelines must be used starting July 1, 2020, as required in CEQA section 15064.3.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 53 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 39
PROPOSED FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU QUEUEING ANALYSIS SUMMARY: WEEKDAY CONDITIONS 0 44 44 58.7%
1 18 62 82.7%
29 71 94.7%
34 75 100.0%
Total 75 -- --
Average 1 -- --
85th Percentile 2 -- --
95th Percentile 2 -- --
Max 3 -- --
Frequency Percentage
Queue Length
(Vehicles)
Queue Frequency of
Vehicles Observed

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 54 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
TABLE 40
PROPOSED FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU QUEUEING ANALYSIS SUMMARY: SATURDAY CONDITIONS 0 52 52 69.3%
1 11 63 84.0%
28 71 94.7%
33 74 98.7%
41 75 100.0%
Total 75 -- --
Average 1 -- --
85th Percentile 2 -- --
95th Percentile 2 -- --
Max 4 -- --
Queue Length
(Vehicles)
Queue Frequency of
Vehicles Observed Frequency Percentage

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 55 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
The City of Laguna Hills has adopted criteria for evaluating VMT impacts under CEQA, and they are presented in the City of Laguna Hills Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Guidelines under the California Environmental Quality Act (July 9, 2020).

Based on the application of the City’s screening criteria, and using the City’s spreadsheet tool developed for project screening purposes, it was determined that the Project is a local serving land use and located in a low VMT area, and is therefore screened out from further VMT Project-level assessment because it can be presumed to have less-than-significant impact on VMT. The City’s VMT screening form for the Project is included in Appendix H.

7.2 Active Transportation and Public Transit Screening Analysis As detailed in the City’s VMT analysis guidelines, potential impacts to active transportation (pedestrian and bicycle) and public transit facilities and circulation can be evaluated by determining whether a project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities.

The proposed Project would not have an impact on the existing multimodal network; specifically, it would not: (1) conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy related to bicycle, pedestrian, and public transit; (2) substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature; and (3) result in inadequate emergency access.

The proposed site plan for the Project will maintain existing sidewalks and access to public transit, construct new pedestrian connections on site and with adjoining uses, provide 12 short-term (bike racks) and 3 long-term (bike lockers) bicycle spaces, provide 2 EV charging stations, provide for future EV stations in the parking field (with stub-out electrical lines), and meet City design standards regarding site access, multimodal connectivity within the internal site circulation system, emergency access, and on-site parking.

8.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Project Description – The existing Laguna Hills Plaza is located at 24901 Alicia Parkway in the City of Laguna Hills, and totals 106,285 square feet (SF) of gross floor area consisting of 87,231 SF of retail, 10,130 SF of restaurants, 6,168 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. The Project proposes to increase the retail and restaurant square footage (the existing offices, health club/martial arts studio, Carl’s Jr., and the western shops building will be maintained) with the following four development scenarios ranging in total size for the shopping center between 100,409 SF (Option 1A) and 106,456 SF (Option 2B):
 Major Building Option 1A and Option 1B: Demolish the existing 45,013-SF ‘Dick’s Sporting Goods’ building at the northeast corner of the Plaza and construct a new/replacement 42,709-SF Grocery Store, as well as 3,362 SF of in-line restaurants with 1,000 SF of outdoor seating.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 56 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
o Option 1A with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Fast-Food with Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF “shops building” on the eastern edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with a new 2,500-SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru located between the existing driveways along Alicia Parkway (on the property’s southern boundary). Option 1A will result in a total of 100,409 SF consisting of 76,000 SF of retail, 16,992 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. o Option 1B with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Retail and FastFood without Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the east edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with approximately 3,126 SF of retail uses and a 1,875-SF fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 1B will result in a total of 102,910 SF consisting of 79,126 SF of retail, 16,367 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.
 Major Building Option 2A and Option 2B: Demolish the existing 45,013-SF ‘Dick’s Sporting Goods’ building at the northeast corner of the Plaza, construct a new/replacement 42,709-SF Grocery Store, and expand the existing 25,532-SF ‘BIG Lots’ tenant space by 7,908 SF.
o Option 2A with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Fast-Food with Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the eastern edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with a new 2,500-SF fast-food restaurant with drive-thru located between the existing driveways along Alicia Parkway (on the property’s southern boundary). Option 2A will result in a total of 103,955 SF consisting of 83,908 SF of retail, 12,630 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses. o Option 2B with Shops Building Demolition and Conversion to Retail and FastFood without Drive-Thru: Demolish the existing 6,642-SF shops building on the east edge of the property (adjacent to Hon Avenue) that presently contains commercial retail and medical office uses and, after some minor remedial grading, turn this area into a parking field. Move/replace the shops building with approximately 3,126 SF of retail uses and a 1,875-SF fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru. Option 2B will result in a total of 106,456 SF consisting of 87,034 SF of

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 57 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
retail, 12,005 SF of restaurants, 4,661 SF of offices, and 2,756 SF of health club/martial arts studio uses.

E. Site Access Queuing Analysis – The results of the site access queuing analysis indicate that there would be adequate storage for the eastbound left-turn at Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/paseo de Alicia, and the westbound left-turn at Alicia Parkway at Cousteau Street, and the inbound/outbound movements at each of the site access points under Year 2024 conditions, with a few exceptions described below during the peak hour noted.  The queuing results for the eastbound left-turn movement at Project Driveway #2 (from eastbound Alicia Parkway entering the Project site), and the outbound movements at Project Driveways #3 and #4 (exiting the Project site onto Hon Avenue), indicate that the 95th percentile queues would exceed existing queue storage lengths.  To address the queue storage deficiency at the Project Driveway #2 and Alicia Parkway intersection (left-turns from eastbound Alicia Parkway entering the Project site) during the PM peak hour, eastbound left-turn pocket and median improvements along Alicia Parkway are proposed. The existing eastbound left-turn pocket on Alicia Parkway will be extended to provide a queue storage length of 135 feet in order to fully accommodate 95th percentile queues entering the Project site that range between 123 feet (under Option 2B) and 135 feet (under Option 2A).
 Related to the queue storage deficiencies reported for the outbound/exiting movements from the Project site onto Hon Avenue at Project Driveway #3 (during the PM peak hour) and at Project Driveway #4 (during the AM and PM peak hours), it should be noted that the 95th percentile queues occur on site, not on Hon Avenue, so Project-related queues do

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 58 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
not impact traffic flows on any public street. The outbound queue storage lengths provided at each of these two driveways are constrained by the presence of the easternmost drive aisle for the Plaza (a site plan design necessity for adequate internal circulation and parking accessibility) and the existing driveway for the bank building pad (that is not a part of the Project) on the northwest corner of the Hon Avenue and Alicia Parkway intersection. It is not uncommon for shopping centers to experience internal queues during busy periods, with customers often familiar with and able to anticipate typical peak queues occurring on site, and are able to self-regulate until queues dissipate at the exits (and exiting traffic flows from shopping centers tend to dissipate quickly because vehicle departures are more random and less directional/focused compared to outbound traffic from office buildings during the PM peak hour, for example). Based on these considerations, it is concluded that the outbound 95th percentile queues at Project Driveways #3 and #4 may be measurably adverse, but not considered significant to warrant any physical improvements.

F. Traffic Signal Warrants - The results indicate that the intersection of Project Driveway #2 with Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #3) will exceed the thresholds of Warrant #3, Part B (peak hour volumes) under Existing (2022) and Year 2024 conditions with development of any scenario (Options 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2C). The installation of a traffic signal at this location is not recommended due to the intersection being in close proximity to the signalized intersection of Hon Avenue and Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #1), which is a distance of only 415 feet, and the signalized intersection of Costeau Street and Alicia Parkway (i.e., Key Intersection #6), which is a distance of only 350 feet. Alicia Parkway is a primary arterial, and therefore requires a minimum of a ¼-mile spacing between signalized intersections. Additionally, it is not uncommon for minor streets at unsignalized intersections to experience longer delay due to the heavy volumes on the major street, especially during commute peak periods on weekdays and weekends.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1 59 Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
standards regarding site access, multimodal connectivity within the internal site circulation system, emergency access, and on-site parking.

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza))

LINSCOTT
,LAW &GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2.22.4533.1
Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills
N:\4500\2224533 - Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills\Misc\4533 Dividers.doc APPENDIX A INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION WORKSHEETS (ICUMETHODOLOGY)
A-1

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\4500\2224533 - Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills\Misc\4481 Sub Dividers - A.doc

APPENDIX A-I
EXISTING (2022) LEVEL OF SERVICE

CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
Note: Please note that it is the City’s and Caltrans convention to express the north-south orientation based on the I-5 Freeway. However, the analysis worksheets provided herein utilize the ‘true north’ orientation which assumes Alicia Parkway as north-south. This discrepancy in orientation should be noted when cross referencing the analysis worksheets with the tables in the traffic impact analysis report.

A-2

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.483
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 55 1979 38 99 1561 75 172 4 51 10 2 43 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 495 10 25 390 19 43 1 13 3 1 11 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 55 1979 38 99 1561 75 172 4 51 10 2 43 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 55 1979 38 99 1561 75 172 4 51 10 2 43 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-3

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.483
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.31 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-4

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.034
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 18.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Alicia Parkway at Project Driveway 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 2110 1653 16 0 9
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 527 413 4 0 2
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 1.0000 0.9730 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 2053 1608 16 0 9
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 2053 1608 16 0 9
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-5

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.05
Approach LOSAAC
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 18.95
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.61 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 Movement LOSAAAC
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.95 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-6

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.006
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project Driveway 3 at Hon Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5 17 119 6 29 83
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 4 30 2 7 21
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 16 112 6 27 78
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 16 112 6 27 78
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-7

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.62
Approach LOSAAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.14 0.00 1.95
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.90 1.90 0.00 0.00 1.52 1.52 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 Movement LOSAAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 9.70 8.98 0.00 0.00 7.51 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median200
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-8

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.120
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Driveway 4/Chevron Driveway at Hon Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6 0 20 70 0 6 0 173 3 17 132 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 0 5 17 0 1 0 43 1 4 33 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 1.0000 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 0 18 62 0 5 0 154 3 15 117 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 0 18 62 0 5 0 154 3 15 117 0 Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-9

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.98
Approach LOSABAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.61 11.76 0.00 0.87
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 2.50 2.50 2.50 10.14 10.14 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.41 0.41 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 Movement LOSBBABBAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 10.69 11.10 9.29 12.00 12.12 8.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.12 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median1000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh]0000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-10

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.583
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Alicia Parkway at Costeau Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5 1768 18 73 1514 23 42 13 18 34 11 150 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 442 5 18 379 6 11 3 5 9 3 38 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 1768 18 73 1514 23 42 13 18 34 11 150 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 1768 18 73 1514 23 42 13 18 34 11 150 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-11

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.583
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.11 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-12

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.560
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Alicia Parkway at Wilkes Place
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 1657 150 77 1406 11 22 13 54 121 4 101 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 414 38 19 352 3 6 3 14 30 1 25 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 21 1657 150 77 1406 11 22 13 54 121 4 101 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 21 1657 150 77 1406 11 22 13 54 121 4 101 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-13

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.560
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.06 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-14

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.571
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 8: Alicia Parkway at Paseo de Valencia
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 265 1456 98 65 1262 333 322 320 274 139 423 61 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 66 364 25 16 316 83 81 80 69 35 106 15 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 265 1456 98 65 1262 333 322 320 274 139 423 61 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 265 1456 98 65 1262 333 322 320 274 139 423 61 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-15

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.571
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.04 0.25 0.20 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-16

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.920
Level Of Service: E
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 9: Alicia Parkway at I-5 SB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1929 0 0 1019 0 997 0 820 0 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 482 0 0 255 0 249 0 205 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1929 178 0 1019 594 997 0 820 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1929 178 0 1019 594 997 0 820 0 0 0 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-17

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.920
Intersection LOS E
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-18

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.602
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 10: Alicia Parkway at I-5 NB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1740 0 0 1541 0 0 0 0 112 0 358 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 435 0 0 385 0 0 0 0 28 0 90 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1740 1197 0 1541 1510 0 0 0 112 0 358 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1740 1197 0 1541 1510 0 0 0 112 0 358 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-19

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.602
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.21 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-20

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.605
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 11: Alicia Parkway at Charlinda Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 47 1906 30 37 2890 77 97 7 85 69 7 33 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 12 477 8 9 723 19 24 2 21 17 2 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 47 1906 30 37 2890 77 97 7 85 69 7 33 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 47 1906 30 37 2890 77 97 7 85 69 7 33 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-21

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.605
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.37 0.02 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.02 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-22

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.763
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 12: Alicia Parkway at Miurlands Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 195 1708 112 170 2376 111 105 445 441 129 330 206 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 49 427 28 43 594 28 26 111 110 32 83 52 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 195 1708 112 170 2376 111 105 445 441 129 330 206 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 195 1708 112 170 2376 111 105 445 441 129 330 206 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-23

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.763
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.33 0.07 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.08 0.10 0.12 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-24

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.580
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 89 1647 13 55 1709 150 280 4 101 39 7 94 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 22 412 3 14 427 38 70 1 25 10 2 24 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 89 1647 13 55 1709 150 280 4 101 39 7 94 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 89 1647 13 55 1709 150 280 4 101 39 7 94 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-25

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.580
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.34 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.06 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-26

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.101
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 23.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Alicia Parkway at Project Driveway 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1848 1894 37 0 22
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 462 474 9 0 6
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0000 0.9380 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1733 1777 35 0 21
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1733 1777 35 0 21
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-27

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.13
Approach LOSAAC
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 23.29
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.28 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 Movement LOSAAAC
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.29 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-28

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.021
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project Driveway 3 at Hon Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15 63 141 17 44 136
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 16 35 4 11 34
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 14 59 133 16 41 128
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 59 133 16 41 128
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-29

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.61
Approach LOSAAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.64 0.00 1.86
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 7.52 7.52 0.00 0.00 2.39 2.39 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 Movement LOSBAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 10.49 9.44 0.00 0.00 7.61 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median200
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-30

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 259
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.134
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 15.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Driveway 4/Chevron Driveway at Hon Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5 0 51 53 1 14 0 316 6 13 206 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 0 13 13 0 3 0 79 2 3 51 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 1.0000 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 0 49 50 1 13 0 301 6 12 196 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 0 49 50 1 13 0 301 6 12 196 0 Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-31

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.51
Approach LOSBBAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.61 14.29 0.00 0.47
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 6.52 6.52 6.52 11.75 11.75 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 Movement LOSBBBCBAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 12.35 12.54 10.44 15.57 14.71 9.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.94 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median1000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh]0000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-32

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.504
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Alicia Parkway at Costeau Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9 1654 21 80 1703 35 26 1 13 25 5 77 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 414 5 20 426 9 7 0 3 6 1 19 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 1654 21 80 1703 35 26 1 13 25 5 77 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 1654 21 80 1703 35 26 1 13 25 5 77 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-33

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.504
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.06 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-34

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.459
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Alicia Parkway at Wilkes Place
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 40 1688 40 63 1570 22 18 1 27 27 5 33 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 10 422 10 16 393 6 5 0 7 7 1 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 40 1688 40 63 1570 22 18 1 27 27 5 33 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 40 1688 40 63 1570 22 18 1 27 27 5 33 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-35

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.459
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-36

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.572
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 8: Alicia Parkway at Paseo de Valencia
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 296 1353 91 147 1274 319 325 426 435 92 277 72 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 74 338 23 37 319 80 81 107 109 23 69 18 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 296 1353 91 147 1274 319 325 426 435 92 277 72 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 296 1353 91 147 1274 319 325 426 435 92 277 72 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-37

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.572
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.09 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.25 0.19 0.10 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-38

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.958
Level Of Service: E
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 9: Alicia Parkway at I-5 SB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1812 0 0 1148 0 1091 0 836 0 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 453 0 0 287 0 273 0 209 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1812 215 0 1148 502 1091 0 836 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1812 215 0 1148 502 1091 0 836 0 0 0 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-39

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.958
Intersection LOS E
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-40

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.737
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 10: Alicia Parkway at I-5 NB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1949 0 0 1506 0 0 0 0 200 0 519 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 487 0 0 377 0 0 0 0 50 0 130 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1949 966 0 1506 1123 0 0 0 200 0 519 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1949 966 0 1506 1123 0 0 0 200 0 519 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-41

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.737
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-42

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.640
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 11: Alicia Parkway at Charlinda Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 96 2212 47 63 2397 75 126 19 70 130 11 76 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 553 12 16 599 19 32 5 18 33 3 19 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 96 2212 47 63 2397 75 126 19 70 130 11 76 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 2212 47 63 2397 75 126 19 70 130 11 76 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-43

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.640
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.43 0.03 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.01 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-44

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.789
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 12: Alicia Parkway at Miurlands Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 279 2034 108 141 1923 100 135 364 457 119 344 193 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 70 509 27 35 481 25 34 91 114 30 86 48 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 279 2034 108 141 1923 100 135 364 457 119 344 193 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 279 2034 108 141 1923 100 135 364 457 119 344 193 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-45

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.789
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.40 0.06 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.08 0.11 0.19 0.07 0.10 0.11 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-46

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\4500\2224533 - Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills\Misc\4481 Sub Dividers - A.doc

APPENDIX A-II
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT LEVEL OF SERVICE

CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
OPTION 1A
Note: Please note that it is the City’s and Caltrans convention to express the north-south orientation based on the I-5 Freeway. However, the analysis worksheets provided herein utilize the ‘true north’ orientation which assumes Alicia Parkway as north-south. This discrepancy in orientation should be noted when cross referencing the analysis worksheets with the tables in the traffic impact analysis report.

A-47

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.505
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 78 1963 38 99 1601 99 231 4 51 10 2 43 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 20 491 10 25 400 25 58 1 13 3 1 11 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 78 1963 38 99 1601 99 231 4 51 10 2 43 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 78 1963 38 99 1601 99 231 4 51 10 2 43 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-48

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.505
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.31 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-49

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.135
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 21.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Alicia Parkway at Project Driveway 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 2117 1656 53 0 35
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 529 414 13 0 9
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 1.0000 0.9730 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 2060 1611 52 0 34
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 2060 1611 52 0 34
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-50

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.19
Approach LOSAAC
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 21.05
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.52 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 Movement LOSAAAC
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.05 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.14
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-51

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.011
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project Driveway 3 at Hon Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 66 117 13 65 84
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 16 29 3 16 21
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 8 62 111 12 61 79
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 8 62 111 12 61 79
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-52

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.36
Approach LOSAAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.36 0.00 3.31
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 6.71 6.71 0.00 0.00 3.50 3.50 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 Movement LOSBAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 10.37 9.24 0.00 0.00 7.59 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median200
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-53

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.151
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Driveway 4/Chevron Driveway at Hon Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7 0 38 70 0 6 0 221 7 33 170 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 0 10 17 0 1 0 55 2 8 43 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 1.0000 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 6 0 34 62 0 5 0 196 6 29 151 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 6 0 34 62 0 5 0 196 6 29 151 0 Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-54

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.17
Approach LOS B B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.00 13.75 0.00 1.26
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 4.68 4.68 4.68 13.20 13.20 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 1.89 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.53 0.53 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 Movement LOS B B A B B A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.58 11.94 9.71 14.14 13.85 9.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 1 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-55

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.597
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Alicia Parkway at Costeau Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5 1805 18 77 1540 25 44 13 18 34 11 156 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 451 5 19 385 6 11 3 5 9 3 39 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 1805 18 77 1540 25 44 13 18 34 11 156 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 1805 18 77 1540 25 44 13 18 34 11 156 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-56

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.597
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.12 0.12 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-57

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.568
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Alicia Parkway at Wilkes Place
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 1685 150 81 1425 13 25 13 54 121 4 107 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 421 38 20 356 3 6 3 14 30 1 27 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 21 1685 150 81 1425 13 25 13 54 121 4 107 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 21 1685 150 81 1425 13 25 13 54 121 4 107 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-58

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.568
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-59

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.578
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 8: Alicia Parkway at Paseo de Valencia
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 265 1472 98 69 1273 337 328 320 274 139 423 67 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 66 368 25 17 318 84 82 80 69 35 106 17 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 265 1472 98 69 1273 337 328 320 274 139 423 67 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 265 1472 98 69 1273 337 328 320 274 139 423 67 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-60

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.578
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.25 0.20 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-61

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.925
Level Of Service: E
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 9: Alicia Parkway at I-5 SB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1962 0 0 1066 0 997 0 837 0 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 491 0 0 267 0 249 0 209 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1962 190 0 1066 594 997 0 837 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1962 190 0 1066 594 997 0 837 0 0 0 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-62

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.925
Intersection LOS E
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-63

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.606
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 10: Alicia Parkway at I-5 NB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1761 0 0 1571 0 0 0 0 129 0 358 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 440 0 0 393 0 0 0 0 32 0 90 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1761 1209 0 1571 1510 0 0 0 129 0 358 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1761 1209 0 1571 1510 0 0 0 129 0 358 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-64

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.606
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.21 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-65

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.610
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 11: Alicia Parkway at Charlinda Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 48 1925 31 37 2918 77 97 7 86 70 7 33 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 12 481 8 9 730 19 24 2 22 18 2 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 48 1925 31 37 2918 77 97 7 86 70 7 33 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 1925 31 37 2918 77 97 7 86 70 7 33 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-66

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.610
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.02 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-67

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.771
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 12: Alicia Parkway at Miurlands Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 199 1719 116 170 2392 111 105 445 447 135 330 206 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 50 430 29 43 598 28 26 111 112 34 83 52 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 199 1719 116 170 2392 111 105 445 447 135 330 206 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 199 1719 116 170 2392 111 105 445 447 135 330 206 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-68

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.771
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.08 0.10 0.12 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 3: 3 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-69

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.630
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 111 1613 13 55 1740 180 384 4 101 39 7 94 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 28 403 3 14 435 45 96 1 25 10 2 24 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 111 1613 13 55 1740 180 384 4 101 39 7 94 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 111 1613 13 55 1740 180 384 4 101 39 7 94 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-70

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.630
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.34 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.06 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-71

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.347
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 30.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Alicia Parkway at Project Driveway 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1835 1881 84 0 74
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 459 470 21 0 18
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0000 0.9380 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1721 1764 79 0 69
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1721 1764 79 0 69
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-72

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.59
Approach LOSAAD
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 30.63
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.79 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 Movement LOSAAAD
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.63 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.35
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-73

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.033
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project Driveway 3 at Hon Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 153 136 29 82 137
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 38 34 7 20 34
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 20 144 128 27 77 129
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 20 144 128 27 77 129
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-74

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 4.34
Approach LOSBAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.28 0.00 2.88
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 18.98 18.98 0.00 0.00 4.61 4.61 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 Movement LOSBBAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.66 10.09 0.00 0.00 7.70 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median200
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-75

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.187
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 20.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Driveway 4/Chevron Driveway at Hon Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6 0 82 53 1 14 0 396 11 28 244 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 0 20 13 0 3 0 99 3 7 61 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 1.0000 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 6 0 78 50 1 13 0 377 10 27 232 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 6 0 78 50 1 13 0 377 10 27 232 0 Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-76

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.00
Approach LOS B C A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.65 18.35 0.00 0.84
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.10 12.10 12.10 17.18 17.18 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 1.87 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.69 0.69 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 Movement LOS B B B C C A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.96 14.02 11.48 20.65 18.23 9.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.19 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 1 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-77

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.518
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Alicia Parkway at Costeau Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9 1689 21 86 1742 37 28 1 13 25 5 82 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 422 5 22 436 9 7 0 3 6 1 21 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 1689 21 86 1742 37 28 1 13 25 5 82 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 1689 21 86 1742 37 28 1 13 25 5 82 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-78

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.518
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.07 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-79

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.472
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Alicia Parkway at Wilkes Place
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 40 1714 40 69 1599 26 21 1 27 27 5 38 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 10 429 10 17 400 7 5 0 7 7 1 10 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 40 1714 40 69 1599 26 21 1 27 27 5 38 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 40 1714 40 69 1599 26 21 1 27 27 5 38 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-80

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.472
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-81

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.578
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 8: Alicia Parkway at Paseo de Valencia
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 296 1368 91 153 1291 325 330 426 435 92 277 77 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 74 342 23 38 323 81 83 107 109 23 69 19 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 296 1368 91 153 1291 325 330 426 435 92 277 77 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 296 1368 91 153 1291 325 330 426 435 92 277 77 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-82

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.578
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.25 0.19 0.10 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.05 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-83

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.966
Level Of Service: E
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 9: Alicia Parkway at I-5 SB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1862 0 0 1193 0 1091 0 852 0 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 466 0 0 298 0 273 0 213 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1862 233 0 1193 502 1091 0 852 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1862 233 0 1193 502 1091 0 852 0 0 0 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-84

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.966
Intersection LOS E
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-85

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.744
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 10: Alicia Parkway at I-5 NB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1981 0 0 1534 0 0 0 0 216 0 519 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 495 0 0 384 0 0 0 0 54 0 130 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1981 984 0 1534 1123 0 0 0 216 0 519 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1981 984 0 1534 1123 0 0 0 216 0 519 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-86

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.744
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-87

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.645
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 11: Alicia Parkway at Charlinda Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 97 2241 48 63 2423 75 126 19 71 131 11 76 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 560 12 16 606 19 32 5 18 33 3 19 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 97 2241 48 63 2423 75 126 19 71 131 11 76 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 97 2241 48 63 2423 75 126 19 71 131 11 76 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-88

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.645
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.44 0.03 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.01 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-89

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.796
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 12: Alicia Parkway at Miurlands Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 285 2051 114 141 1938 100 135 364 462 124 344 193 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 71 513 29 35 485 25 34 91 116 31 86 48 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 285 2051 114 141 1938 100 135 364 462 124 344 193 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 285 2051 114 141 1938 100 135 364 462 124 344 193 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-90

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.796
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.40 0.07 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.08 0.11 0.19 0.07 0.10 0.11 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 4: 4 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1A
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-91

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 2-16-3695-1 Kendall-Palm Commercial, San Bernardino
N:\4500\2224533 - Laguna Hills Plaza, Laguna Hills\Misc\4481 Sub Dividers - A.doc

APPENDIX A-III
EXISTING (2022) PLUS PROJECT LEVEL OF SERVICE

CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
OPTION 1B
Note: Please note that it is the City’s and Caltrans convention to express the north-south orientation based on the I-5 Freeway. However, the analysis worksheets provided herein utilize the ‘true north’ orientation which assumes Alicia Parkway as north-south. This discrepancy in orientation should be noted when cross referencing the analysis worksheets with the tables in the traffic impact analysis report.

A-92

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.508
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 82 1973 38 99 1612 98 225 4 51 10 2 43 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 21 493 10 25 403 25 56 1 13 3 1 11 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 82 1973 38 99 1612 98 225 4 51 10 2 43 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 82 1973 38 99 1612 98 225 4 51 10 2 43 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-93

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.508
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.32 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-94

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.113
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 20.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Alicia Parkway at Project Driveway 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 2132 1668 53 0 29
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 533 417 13 0 7
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 1.0000 0.9730 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 2074 1623 52 0 28
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 2074 1623 52 0 28
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-95

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.16
Approach LOSAAC
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 20.80
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.42 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 Movement LOSAAAC
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.80 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.11
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-96

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.014
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project Driveway 3 at Hon Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10 58 121 12 68 84
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 15 30 3 17 21
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 0.9450 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 55 114 11 64 79
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 55 114 11 64 79
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-97

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.28
Approach LOSAAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.41 0.00 3.40
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 6.23 6.23 0.00 0.00 3.68 3.68 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 Movement LOSBAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 10.40 9.24 0.00 0.00 7.60 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median200
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-98

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.150
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Driveway 4/Chevron Driveway at Hon Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7 0 36 70 0 6 0 216 7 33 173 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 0 9 17 0 1 0 54 2 8 43 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 1.0000 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 0.8880 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 6 0 32 62 0 5 0 192 6 29 154 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 6 0 32 62 0 5 0 192 6 29 154 0 Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-99

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.15
Approach LOS A B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.98 13.68 0.00 1.24
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 4.45 4.45 4.45 13.09 13.09 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.88 1.88 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 Movement LOS B B A B B A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.56 11.91 9.67 14.06 13.80 9.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.74 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 1 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-100

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.599
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Alicia Parkway at Costeau Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5 1811 18 77 1542 25 45 13 18 34 11 157 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 453 5 19 386 6 11 3 5 9 3 39 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 5 1811 18 77 1542 25 45 13 18 34 11 157 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 5 1811 18 77 1542 25 45 13 18 34 11 157 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-101

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.599
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.12 0.12 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-102

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.569
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Alicia Parkway at Wilkes Place
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 1689 150 81 1427 14 26 13 54 121 4 108 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 422 38 20 357 4 7 3 14 30 1 27 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 21 1689 150 81 1427 14 26 13 54 121 4 108 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 21 1689 150 81 1427 14 26 13 54 121 4 108 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Wilkes Pl Wilkes Pl
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-103

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.569
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-104

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.579
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 8: Alicia Parkway at Paseo de Valencia
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 25.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 265 1475 98 69 1274 337 329 320 274 139 423 68 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 66 369 25 17 319 84 82 80 69 35 106 17 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 265 1475 98 69 1274 337 329 320 274 139 423 68 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 265 1475 98 69 1274 337 329 320 274 139 423 68 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Paseo de Valencia Paseo de Valencia Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-105

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.579
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.25 0.20 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.04 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-106

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.925
Level Of Service: E
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 9: Alicia Parkway at I-5 SB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1965 0 0 1074 0 997 0 840 0 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 491 0 0 269 0 249 0 210 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1965 191 0 1074 594 997 0 840 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1965 191 0 1074 594 997 0 840 0 0 0 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 SB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-107

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.925
Intersection LOS E
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-108

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.606
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 10: Alicia Parkway at I-5 NB Ramps
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1763 0 0 1576 0 0 0 0 132 0 358 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 441 0 0 394 0 0 0 0 33 0 90 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1763 1210 0 1576 1510 0 0 0 132 0 358 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1763 1210 0 1576 1510 0 0 0 132 0 358 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy I-5 NB Ramp
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-109

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.606
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.21 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Unsigna Permiss Permiss Permiss Split Permiss Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-110

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.611
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 11: Alicia Parkway at Charlinda Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 48 1927 31 37 2922 77 97 7 86 70 7 33 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 12 482 8 9 731 19 24 2 22 18 2 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 48 1927 31 37 2922 77 97 7 86 70 7 33 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 1927 31 37 2922 77 97 7 86 70 7 33 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Charlinda Dr Charlinda Dr
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-111

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.611
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.02 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-112

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.772
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 12: Alicia Parkway at Miurlands Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 199 1720 116 170 2395 111 105 445 448 136 330 206 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 50 430 29 43 599 28 26 111 112 34 83 52 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 199 1720 116 170 2395 111 105 445 448 136 330 206 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 199 1720 116 170 2395 111 105 445 448 136 330 206 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Miurlands Blvd Miurlands Blvd Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-113

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.772
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.13 0.21 0.08 0.10 0.12 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 1,8
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 8 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 5: 5 AM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-114

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.632
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Alicia Parkway at Hon Avenue/Paseo de Alicia Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 112 1616 13 55 1743 180 386 4 101 39 7 94 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 28 404 3 14 436 45 97 1 25 10 2 24 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 112 1616 13 55 1743 180 386 4 101 39 7 94 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 112 1616 13 55 1743 180 386 4 101 39 7 94 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Hon Ave Paseo de Alicia
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-115

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection V/C 0.632
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.34 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.06 0.06 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Split Split Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 5.00
Cycle Length [s] 100
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-116

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.338
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 30.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Alicia Parkway at Project Driveway 2
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 1839 1884 83 0 72
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 460 471 21 0 18
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0000 0.9380 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 1725 1767 78 0 68
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 1725 1767 78 0 68
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Project Dwy 2
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-117

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.56
Approach LOSAAD
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 30.34
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.50 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 Movement LOSAAAD
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.34 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.34
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-118

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.033
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project Driveway 3 at Hon Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 153 137 27 84 137
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 38 34 7 21 34
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 0.9420 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 20 144 129 25 79 129
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 20 144 129 25 79 129
Name Project Dwy 3 Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-119

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 4.36
Approach LOSBAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.28 0.00 2.93
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 19.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 4.73 4.73 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 Movement LOSBBAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.69 10.09 0.00 0.00 7.71 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median200
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-120

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.188
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 20.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Driveway 4/Chevron Driveway at Hon Avenue Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6 0 82 53 1 14 0 396 11 29 246 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 0 20 13 0 3 0 99 3 7 61 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 1.0000 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 0.9520 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 6 0 78 50 1 13 0 377 10 28 234 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 6 0 78 50 1 13 0 377 10 28 234 0 Name Project Dwy 4 Chevron Dwy Hon Ave Hon Ave
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-121

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.00
Approach LOS B C A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.65 18.45 0.00 0.87
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.11 12.11 12.11 17.32 17.32 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.94 1.94 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.69 0.69 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 Movement LOS B B B C C A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.99 14.05 11.48 20.79 18.35 9.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.21 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.19 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 1 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance Yes No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-122

5.5.1.c
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment C – Traffic Impact Analysis (3057 : SDP/TPM/PUP No. USE-0105-2022 (Laguna Hills Plaza)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.519
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 6: Alicia Parkway at Costeau Street
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9 1691 21 86 1744 38 28 1 13 25 5 83 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 423 5 22 436 10 7 0 3 6 1 21 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 1691 21 86 1744 38 28 1 13 25 5 83 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 1691 21 86 1744 38 28 1 13 25 5 83 Name Alicia Pkwy Alicia Pkwy Costeau St Costeau St
Volumes
4533 - Laguna Hills Plaza
Scenario 6: 6 PM Existing Plus Project Option 1B
Version 2021 (SP 0-6)
Generated with
A-123

Laguna Hills City CouncilJanuary 24, 2023

Laguna Hills City Council
January 24, 2023