Lake Forest City Council
October 3, 2023

AGENDA

LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of the City Council
Tuesday, October 3, 2023
Closed Session 5:30 p.m.

Public Session 6:30 p.m.

City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California NOTICE: Pursuant to Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 2.04.010, Regular Meetings of the City Council are held the First and Third Tuesday of each month at the hour of 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session matters, if required.

The Public Session of the meeting shall commence at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Special Meeting times may be held at a different time and date as listed on the Agenda.

AGENDA DOCUMENT REVIEW: The Agenda and staff reports are available on the Internet at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas and at the City Clerk’s Office, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, on the Friday before the meeting on Tuesday.

AGENDA DESCRIPTION: The Agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public of a general summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The listed Recommended Action represents staff’s recommendation. The City Council may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the recommended action.

AGENDA ON SOCIAL MEDIA: This meeting will be streamed through Facebook Live. Comments will not be taken via Facebook Live. The City provides the Facebook Live stream as an additional service to the public.

However, the City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted. The City is not responsible for any interrupted service.

SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEETING AND PUBLIC COMMENT:

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: In addition to attending in person, members of the public may access the meeting live on our website at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas.

PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO THE MEETING: Members of the public may submit email comments to [email protected]. Email comments will be uploaded to the agenda packet and made part of the official public record of the meeting and will not be read at the meeting. To ensure staff reviews all comments prior to the City Council meeting, please submit email comments no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public may provide comments in-person at the meeting. Public comments will no longer be accepted remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in-person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk. To ensure prompt distribution to the City Council, members of the public wishing to provide written materials to the City Council should do so prior to the start of the meeting or as close thereto as possible, as time will not be taken during the public comment period to distribute written materials to the City Council.

October 3, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 CALL TO ORDER:

Council Members:

Mayor Pro Tem:

Mayor:

City Manager:

City Attorney:

City Clerk:
5:30 p.m.

Robert Pequeño
Scott Voigts
Benjamin Yu
Mark Tettemer
Doug Cirbo
Debra Rose
Matthew E. Richardson
Lisa Berglund
CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT:

CLOSED SESSION: At this time, the City Council may recess to Closed Session for conference with Legal Counsel to discuss the items listed below pursuant to Government Code requirements. Any items not concluded by 6:30 p.m. may be continued to the end of the Public Session. At this time, members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items listed on the Closed Session agenda. No action may be taken on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. Comments shall be limited to three minutes per item. Any person wishing to address the City Council on a Closed Session matter is requested to complete a "Request to Speak" form available at agenda public review table near the entrance. The completed form is to be submitted to the City Clerk prior to an individual being heard by the City Council. Whenever possible, lengthy testimony should be presented to the City Council in writing (8 copies) and only pertinent points presented orally.

CLOSED SESSION (Item No. 1)
CLOSED SESSION: At this time, the City Council may recess to Closed Session for conference with Legal Counsel to discuss the items listed below pursuant to Government Code requirements. Any items not concluded by 6:30 p.m. may be continued to the end of the Public Session.

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION

INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.9(D)(4)
NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct closed session.

RECESS: City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business.

RECONVENE: City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.

October 3, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 PUBLIC SESSION: 6:30 p.m.

PUBLIC SESSION: At this time, the City Council will convene to consider public matters. Those wishing to address the City Council must submit a completed “Request to Speak” form to the City Clerk prior to City Council action.

INVOCATION: The Invocation will be provided by Elder Tim Bruton, Grace Community Church.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country to be led by Cub Scout Pack #765.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT: City Attorney will report on Closed Session.

REPORT FROM STUDENT LIAISON: Report from Aarav Rajpara, Student Liaison from El Toro High School.

PRESENTATIONS (Item No. 2)

2. PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 8-14, 2023 "FIRE
PREVENTION WEEK"
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Present a proclamation declaring October 8-14, 2023, as "Fire Prevention Week."

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public can submit an e-comment to [email protected]. E-comments will not be read at the meeting.

Members of the public may also provide comments in-person at the meeting. Those wishing to provide comments at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk.

CONSENT CALENDAR (Item Nos. 3 – 5)
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

3. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES October 3, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve as submitted.

5. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR THE COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC

SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement No.

C-3-2427 between Orange County Transportation Authority and the City of Lake Forest for the Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project for implementation of signal timing improvements within the City under the OC- Go (formerly known as Measure M2) Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P). 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Cooperative Agreement No. C-3-2427, substantially in the form attached in accordance with OCTA’s contract management.

DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS (Item Nos. 6 – 7)
The following matters are for City Council consideration/discussion/action. Members of the public may have the opportunity to address these items if they wish to do so. Please complete the Request to Speak form and give to the City Clerk.

6. STRATEGIC ECONOMIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Receive and file a report summarizing the success of the City’s Strategic Economic Investment Program. 2. Direct staff to return to the Audit Committee to discuss potential adjustments to the Strategic Economic Investment Program spending categories.

7. 2023-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
October 3, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file a presentation updating the City Council on the status of projects in the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Program.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
At this time, the City Manager may comment on agenda and non-agenda items; and report on items of interest to the City Council and community.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
At this time, City Council Members may comment on agenda or non-agenda matters. No discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, respond to statements made or questions posed by the public, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. In addition, the City Council may refer to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting or direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. No action may be taken on non-agenda matters unless authorized by law (Government Code Section 54954.2).

Council Member Pequeño:

Council Member Voigts:

Council Member Yu:

Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer:

Mayor Cirbo:

October 3, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5

ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (949) 461-3400.

Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and agenda back-up materials can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk on the Friday prior to the City Council meeting. Copies of all Agendas, Staff Reports and Supporting Materials can also be found on the City’s website – https://www.lakeforestca.gov/129/Agendas.

Agenda and agenda packets, if requested, will be made available in an appropriate alternative format to persons with a disability as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Copies of the agenda are provided at no cost and agenda back-up materials are available at the per page copy cost.

The City of Lake Forest mailing address is City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California.

Phone: (949) 461-3400. FAX (949) 461-3511
CERTIFICATION: I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review at City Hall on September 28, 2023.

Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
October 3, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 8-14, 2023 "FIRE PREVENTION WEEK"
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Present a proclamation declaring October 8-14, 2023, as "Fire Prevention Week."
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Orange County Fire Authority (“OCFA”) is requesting the City Council join surrounding cities in declaring October 8-14, 2023, as “Fire Prevention Week.” This observance recognizes the importance of safety practices, including the installation of working smoke alarms in the home. OCFA is encouraging residents to install and maintain smoke alarms in each sleeping area and on every level of their home.

This year, the OCFA Fire Prevention Week theme of “Cooking Safety Starts with YOU. Pay attention to fire prevention.” educates everyone about simple, but important actions they can take to keep themselves and those around them safe from cooking fires.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

October 2023 Fire Prevention Week Proclamation
Initiated By: Thy Merritt, Assistant City Clerk
Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager

5 2
4 1
6 Attachment
5 2
4 1
6 P R O C L A M A T I O N
Recognizing October 8-14, 2023
as

FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
WHEREAS, fire is a serious public safety concern both locally and nationally, and homes are where people are at greatest risk from fire; and
WHEREAS, cooking is the leading cause of house fires and injuries in the nation causing nearly half of all home structure fires; and
WHEREAS, more than 3,000 Americans die in fires each year. Working smoke alarms in the home can reduce the risk of dying in a fire by more than half. An average of 358,500 homes experience a structural fire each year. These fires result in 7 deaths every day; and WHEREAS, more than a third of home fire deaths occur in homes with no smoke alarms.

The risk of dying in reported home structure fires is 55 percent lower in homes with working smoke alarms; and
WHEREAS, City of Lake Forest residents are responsive to public education and outreach measures and can take personal steps to increase their safety from fire, especially in their homes; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 Fire Prevention Week theme, “Cooking Safety Starts with YOU.

Pay attention to fire prevention” effectively serves to remind us to educate everyone about simple but important actions they can take to keep themselves and those around them safe from cooking fires.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lake Forest, California, does hereby proclaim October 8-14, 2023, as “Fire Prevention Week” and urge residents to practice safe cooking habits, stay in the kitchen while cooking, remove items from around the stove that can catch fire, and support the many public safety activities and efforts of Orange County Fire Authority during Fire Prevention Week 2023.
_________________

DOUG CIRBO
Mayor
_____________________

MARK TETTEMER
Mayor Pro Tem
_____________________
ROBERT PEQUEÑO
Council Member
_____________________

SCOTT VOIGTS
Council Member
_____________________

BENJAMIN YU
Council Member

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:

MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

California Government Code 36934 allows titles of ordinances and resolutions to be waived.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, MPA, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
14 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST

The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Forest held Tuesday, September 19, 2023, at the Lake Forest City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, was called to order at 5:30 p.m. with all members present.

ROLL CALL:

Council Members:

Robert Pequeño
Scott Voigts
Benjamin Yu
Mayor Pro Tem: Mark Tettemer
Mayor: Doug Cirbo

City Manager: Debra Rose
City Attorney: Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk: Lisa Berglund

CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4) Number of potential cases: 1

ACTION: Closed session was conducted.

2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8
Property: 25092 Farthing Street, Lake Forest CA
APN: 614-021-34
Agency Negotiator: City Manager, Director of Public Works Negotiating Parties: City of Lake Forest and Lee Harris, Trustee to EFTFTB, LLC, and/or their authorized agent(s)
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment

ACTION: Closed session was conducted.

RECESS: City Council recessed to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business.

At 6:34 p.m. Mayor Cirbo reconvened Open Session with all members present.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT: City Attorney Richardson had no action to report.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Andrew O’Connor expressed his concerns with Best, Best, and

September 19, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 6

Krieger.

INVOCATION: The Invocation will be provided by Battalion 4 Chaplain Ken Krikac, Orange County Fire Authority.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country to be led by Girl Scouts Troop #8621.

PRESENTATIONS: (Item Nos. 3 – 4)
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to approve Presentation Items 3 – 4. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

3. PROCLAMATION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 2023 AS SERVICE CLUBS MONTH

City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited City Clerk Berglund to summarize the item. Deepak Sinha from Rotary Club offered public comment and thanked the Council for this proclamation.

ACTION: Proclamations designating September 2023 as "Service Clubs Month" were presented to Sean Fletcher representing Lake Forest Trash Walkers and Clean Lake Forest, Elaine Pong representing Kiwanis Club of Lake Forest, Sue Burke and Barbara Foster representing Soroptimist International, Jim Richert representing the Sun and Sail Women’s Garden Club, Mary Visconti representing U.S. Marine Corp Support Committee 1
st ANGLICO, Mary Visconti
and Connie Visconti representing the Lake Forest Chamber of Commerce and Deepak Sinha and Sean Fletcher representing the Rotary Club.

4. RECOGNITION OF THE 50th ANNIVERSARY OF EL TORO HIGH SCHOOL

City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited City Clerk Berglund to summarize the item. No public comment was offered.

ACTION: A proclamation recognizing the 50th anniversary of El Toro High School was approved as submitted and presented to Principal Dr. Jimmy Martin.

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Andrea Alexander spoke on crossing guard services, the Sustainability Decathlon and her support for the City to donate to the event, and the development of homes at the Meadows Community in lieu of a school.

Bob Holtzclaw spoke on his concerns about the presence of bicycle parts and various other trash items at Heroes Parks.

Andrew O’Connor spoke on his concerns with maintenance at Heroes Park, the

September 19, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 3 of 6

development of a warehouse distribution center, and lane closures.

Austin Skalsky spoke on his gratitude for the fields and soccer parks.

Matt Morrisette spoke on the potential to add pickle ball courts to Foothill Ranch.

Mark Roche spoke on his gratitude for living in Lake Forest and thanked the Council Members for their service.

CONSENT CALENDAR: (Item Nos. 5 – 12)
Item Nos. 7 – 9 were pulled for discussion.

MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 5 – 6, and 10 – 12. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

5. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appeared on the public agenda were determined to have been read by title and further reading was waived.

6. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2023

ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.

10. THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CLEARSOURCE

FINANCIAL CONSULTING FOR MASTER FEE SCHEDULE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

ACTION: 1. The Third Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with ClearSource Financial Consulting for Master Fee Schedule Services for Fiscal Year 2023-24 to extend the term only was approved. 2. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Third Amendment to the Agreement, substantially in the form attached.

11. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES OR

TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX RECORDS

ACTION: A Resolution Entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES OR TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX RECORDS was adopted.

12. REJECT ALL BIDS AND AUTHORIZE RE-BIDDING FOR HEROES PARK

SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING LED CONVERSION AND ELECTRICAL REPAIRS PROJECT (PW 2019-21)

September 19, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 4 of 6

ACTION: 1. All bids for the Heroes Park Sports Field Lighting LED Conversion and Electrical Repairs Project (PW 2019-21) were rejected. 2. Staff was authorized to solicit new bids for this project.

ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION: (Item Nos. 7 – 9)

7. CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER

STATEMENT READ INTO THE RECORD:

Council Member Voigts: There is a warrant on the register to the County of Orange. I am an employee of the County of Orange, but I do not work for the department that generated the warrant. Because the County of Orange is a public agency and because I do not work for the department in question, I have determined that I have a non-interest in this warrant and will vote on this item.

Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer: There are warrants on the register to the Irvine Ranch Water District. I am an employee of the Irvine Ranch Water District, but I do not work for the department that generated these warrants. Because the Irvine Ranch Water District is a public agency and because I do not work for the department in question, I have determined that I have a non-interest in these warrants and will vote on these warrants.

Mayor Cirbo: There is a warrant on the register to All City Management Services.

My wife is an employee of the ACMS and I have determined that I have a remote interest in this warrant and will abstain from voting on that warrant.

Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed his concerns with various payments made.

MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to approve the warrant register in the amount of $7,722,237.53 . The
motion was carried by a vote of 5/0, with Mayor Cirbo not voting on the ACMS warrant.

8. CONTRACT AWARD FOR TRAFFIC MODELING SERVICES

Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed his concerns with the contract amount.

MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts, seconded by Council Member Pequeño, to

1. Award an Agreement for Traffic Modeling Services in the amount of $250,000 to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the award of Agreement to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., substantially in the form attached. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

September 19, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 5 of 6

9. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION REVISING EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FOR FULL

TIME EMPLOYEES

Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer made a motion to create an ad hoc committee to provide analysis on better models to address increase in costs. Council Member Pequeño suggested Mayor Cirbo and Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer serve on the ad hoc committee.

MOTION: It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer, seconded by Council Member Voigts, to: Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT OF THE PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS and to create an ad hoc committee consisting of Mayor Cirbo and Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer to provide analysis on better models to address increase in costs. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Item No. 13 – 14)

13. FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER)

Mayor Cirbo opened the Public Hearing. City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Senior Planner Santos to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered. Council member questions were asked and answered. Mayor Cirbo closed the Public Hearing.

MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Yu, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer, to: Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FY 2022-2023 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

REPORT FOR THE CITY'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

14. ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS

City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Economic Development Manager Grijalva to provide a presentation. Mayor Cirbo opened the Public Hearing. Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and spoke on his concerns with the good faith compliance status of several developers. Mayor Cirbo closed the Public Hearing. Council member questions were asked and answered.

MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to: 1. Conduct the annual review of Development Agreements between the City and the following parties: a) USA Portola Properties, LLC

September 19, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 6 of 6

(“Baldwin”); b) Landsea Holdings (“Landsea”); c) Lennar Homes (“Lennar”); d) Shea Homes (“Shea”); e) Toll Brothers West, Inc. (“Toll Brothers”). 2. Find that Baldwin, Landsea, Lennar, Shea, and Toll Brothers are each in good faith compliance with their respective Development Agreements. The motion was carried by a vote of 5/0.

DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEM: (Item No. 15)

15. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY MATTERS

City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Deputy City Manager McGovern to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered. Council member questions were asked and answered.

ACTION: A report summarizing legislative and regulatory matters with the potential to impact the City of Lake Forest was received and filed.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: City Manager Rose had nothing further to report.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:

Council Member Pequeño:

Council Member Pequeño reported on his attendance
at the Clean Lake Forest event. He thanked staff for
all their hard work.

Council Member Voigts:

Council Member Voigts had nothing further to report.

Council Member Yu: Council Member Yu had nothing further to report.

Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer:

Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer had nothing further to report.

Mayor Cirbo:

Mayor Cirbo reported on his attendance at the Lake
Forest Leadership Academy and recognized the
partnership with Saddleback Church for National
Cleanup Day.

ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.

Respectfully submitted:

APPROVED:

LISA BERGLUND DOUG CIRBO

CITY CLERK MAYOR

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR THE COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL

SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Recommend City Council to:

1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement No. C-3-2427 between Orange County Transportation Authority and the City of Lake Forest for the Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project for implementation of signal timing improvements within the City under the OC-Go (formerly known as Measure M2) Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (Project P).

2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Cooperative Agreement No. C-3-2427, substantially in the form attached in accordance with OCTA’s contract management
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) recently updated their Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan (“TSSMP”), which included a recommendation to implement a Countywide Signal Synchronization Program.

This program would prepare a baseline by retiming approximately 2,500 Orange County signals along regionally significant corridors and continue to monitor and retime the signals on a regular basis (which includes approximately 93 traffic signals in the City of Lake Forest). This zone-approach allows for signals to be retimed on a regular basis to minimize conflicts with crossing corridors. OCTA has secured funding for this baseline project and will not need local matching funds for the participating agency. At its September 11, 2023 meeting, the Traffic and Parking Commission (“TPC”) approved staff’s recommendation for approval of the Cooperative Agreement.

Therefore, staff recommends City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement No. C-3-2427 (Attachment 1), which will allow the City of Lake Forest to participate in the Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project. There are

no requirements for local matching funds for this project. However, staff’s time to participate and update signal timing plans will be necessary and sufficient funds have been allocated within the 2023-2025 Operating Budget.

BACKGROUND:

In 2009, the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) developed the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan (“TSSMP”) to outline goals and recommended approaches to implement Measure M2 (now known as “OC Go”) Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (“Project P”). Since its inception, projects funded through Project P have improved travel times, reduced delays and congestion, and increased the number of successive green lights drivers experience in their daily commutes.

In 2019, OCTA staff began a study to evaluate and update the program with todays’ current traffic and technology trends in mind. This study included continuous coordination and meetings with Traffic Forum members, which included representatives from all 34 local cities, the County of Orange, Caltrans, and the Orange County Fire Authority (“OCFA”). The data gathered in collaboration with these agencies for the evaluation of the TSSMP indicated an overall successful implementation of the signal synchronization program through Project P. In the study, the recommendations identified mutual goals to increase the frequency of synchronization and signal improvements.

In 2022, OCTA adopted the TSSMP 2021 Update (Attachment 2). This included an evaluation of the 2009 TSSMP and updated visions, goals, and objectives.

Within the 2021 TSSMP, OCTA moved towards doing a countywide traffic signal synchronization program that would update signal timing parameters within the Signal Synchronization Network for Orange County in a phased approach (Attachment 3). This effort relieves the local agencies from competing against one another regarding signal timing efforts and allows OCTA and the local agency to get updated timing plans and data on a more consistent schedule.

On September 11, 2023, staff presented the Countywide Traffic Signal Synchronization Baseline Project to the Traffic and Parking Commission. The Commission voted to recommend the City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement.

DISCUSSION:

Signal synchronization is a cost-effective way to maximize efficient travel throughput without major new construction. OCTA provides funding and assistance to implement multi-agency signal synchronization as part of OC Go Project P. Through an annual call for projects, OCTA provides competitive grants dedicated to the coordination of traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries.

The goal of Project P is to improve traffic flow by developing and implementing regional signal coordination that crosses local agencies’ boundaries and maintains coordination through freeway interchanges where possible.

Currently, Project P projects are corridor-based and new optimized signal timings are developed based on traffic conditions and current travel patterns, including bicycle and pedestrian activity. These projects optimize traffic signal timing to reduce travel times, stops, delays, and ultimately give users an improved driving experience. Traffic signal equipment and infrastructure upgrades that benefit the operation of the intersections are also eligible improvements as part of the program. Existing synchronization on crossing arterials is also incorporated when and where possible. To quantify signal synchronization benefits, “before” and “after” travel time studies are conducted to evaluate the improvements from these new optimized timing plans. Key to these efforts is regular dialogue between partnering local cities, County of Orange, and Caltrans.

The overall signal synchronization program target is to regularly synchronize 2,000 signalized intersections, as expressed in the 2009 TSSMP. The 2009 TSSMP also includes goals to reduce delay and stops by 10 to 25 percent through Project P. When OCTA staff evaluated these goals in the 2019 TSSMP, it resulted in 79 signal synchronization projects and 2,757 signalized intersections along 705 centerline miles. These projects resulted in an average improvement of 13 percent in travel time, 14 percent in average speed, and 29 percent in stops.

Further analysis of the Project P completed projects indicated that the corridor approach was successful; however, crossing corridors that are being implemented were beginning to experience conflicting timing demands at the project intersections. OCTA reviewed the past decade of the program and has been successfully funding a vast majority of the Project P applications per cycle.

Over those 10 years, 60 percent of Orange County signalized intersections have been synchronized and 18 percent were coordinated through M2.

Based upon the successes of the 2009 TSSMP and the recommendations in the 2019 TSSMP, OCTA agreed that the Project P program should continue, but with recommended adjustments. One of which is to implement a Countywide Signal Synchronization Program, as it is best practice to periodically resynchronize traffic signals to ensure operational efficiency and adjusting for changes in traffic.

To ensure that all signals are revisited even if the level of retiming effort can vary, the following updates were recommended to enhance the signal synchronization program:
- Set a countywide signal synchronization baseline by retiming approximately 2,500 Orange County signals along regionally significant corridors to avoid any crossing coordination conflicts and ensure signal timing is based on current traffic volumes.
- Separate Orange County into zones with signals and corridor segments grouped based on traffic progression and to facilitate implementation. - Transition from corridor-based to zone-based approach that is retimed on a regular basis to minimize conflicts with crossing corridors. Monitor the performance of the signal in the interim and enhance upcoming retiming efforts to maximize the benefits of the zone-based approach. - Continue to offer annual calls that balance signal synchronization and signal capital improvements to ensure Orange County is well equipped to address future traffic volumes/growth and technological advances in the transportation industry.

The recommended updates aim to provide OCTA direction to regularly coordinate signals across Orange County.

Based upon this approach, OCTA has been working with local agencies through various venues, including the Technical Steering Committee, Technical Advisory Committee, and the Traffic Forum to implement the Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project and to refine the program and approach as we move forward. OCTA has secured funds without the need for local agency matching funds to implement the County Signal Synchronization Baseline Project, which will retime approximately 2,500 signals in Orange County. By approving the attached Cooperative Agreement, the City of Lake Forest would agree to participate in the program and update the signal timing per future recommendations from OCTA.

Therefore, staff recommends the City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement with OCTA. The term of the agreement is through December 31, 2028, and may be terminated by either party by providing thirty calendar days prior written notice. .

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is minimal fiscal impact with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Cooperative Agreement No. C-3-2427

2. Traffic Signal Synchronization Program 2021 Update

3. Signal Synchronization Map for Orange County
Initiated By: Tran Tran, Traffic Engineering Manager
Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager

Attachment 1
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

BETWEEN

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
FOR

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT
THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (Agreement), is effective this ______ _ day of _________________, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the Orange County Transportation Authority, 550 South Main Street, P.O. Box 14184, Orange California 92863-1584, a public corporation of the State of California (herein referred to as “AUTHORITY”) and the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the Stat e of California (“PARTICIPATING AGENCY”), each individually known as “Party” and collectively known as “Parties”.

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY in cooperation with the PARTICIPATING AGENCY is working together in coordinating traffic signals across multiple jurisdictional boundaries as a part of the Renewed Measure M (M2) Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program ( RTSSP) to enhance countywide traffic flow and reduce congestion; and
WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY completed a Countywide Signal Synchronization Plan Study (hereinafter, “ PLAN STUDY ”) in support of the RTSSP and received authorization from the AUTHORITY’s Board of Directors on March 14, 2022, to update the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan in accordance with the PLAN STUDY recommendations; and WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY secured Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (“CMAQ”) funds for the implementation of a Countywide Signal Synchronization Baseline Project (hereinafter, “PROJECT”) as presented in the PLAN STUDY; and
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY intends to release a request for proposals to secure a consultant (“CONSULTANT”) to implement the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, based on the PLAN STUDY the AUTHORITY agrees to act as the implementing agency to carry out the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the PROJECT will include approximately 2,500 traffic signalized intersections along regionally significant corridors within Orange County; and WHEREAS, approximately 63 PARTICIPATING AGENCY-owned and operated signalized intersections and 30 optional operated signalized intersections will be included as part of the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the PROJECT will include all 34 Orange County cities and the County of Orange; and
WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY will enter into a separate cooperative agreement with each participating agency in each jurisdiction for implementation of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY and the PARTICIPATING AGENCY acknowledges and understands that in-house resources (staff hours) from the PARTICIPATING AGENCY will provide various services in support of the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY and the PARTICIPATING AGENC Y desire to enter into this Agreement to implement the PROJECT in support of the RTSSP; and WHEREAS, this Agreement defines the specific terms and conditions, and between the AUTHORITY and the PARTICIPATING AGENCY for the implementation of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s City Council approved this Agreement on the _____ day of ___________________, 202_____.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by the AUTHORITY and the PARTICIPATING AGENCY as follows:
/
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

ARTICLE 1. COMPLETE AGREEMENT
A. This Agreement, including any attachments incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the term(s) and conditions(s) of this Agreement between the AUTHORITY and the PARTICIPATING AGENCY, and supersedes all prior representations, understandings, and communications. The invalidity in whole or in part of any term or condition of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or conditions(s) of this Agreement.

The above referenced Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein.

B. The AUTHORITY’s failure to insist on any instance(s) of the PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the AUTHORITY’s right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and the PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the AUTHORITY except when specifically confirmed in writing by an authorized representative of the AUTHORITY by way of a writt en amendment to this Agreement and issued in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

C. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s failure to insist on any instance(s) of the AUTHORITY’s performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this Agreement shall not be cons trued as a waiver or relinquishment of the PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and the AUTHORITY’s obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the PARTICIPATING AGENCY except when specifically confirmed in writing by an authorized representative of the PARTICIPATING AGENCY by way of a written amendment to this Agreement and issued in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
/
/
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

ARTICLE 2. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of the P arties as they pertain to the subjects and PROJECT addressed herein. The Parties agree that each will cooperate and coordinate with the other Party in all activities covered by this Agreement and any other supplemental agreements that may be required to facilitate purposes thereof.

ARTICLE 3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORITY
The AUTHORIT Y, as the lead agency , agrees to the following responsibilities for the implementation of the PROJECT:

A. To designate a Project Manager as a single point of contact for the Project.

B. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall manage, procure, implement, and complete all aspects of the PROJECT, including filing all documentation necessary to comply with the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding for the PROJECT.

C. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall c oordinate outreach with the PARTICIPATING AGENCY for the PROJECT.

D. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall c ollect all data necessary to provide new optimized timing plans including, but not limited to, manual or video all movement counts at each PROJECT signalized intersection, and a mutually agreed upon number and location of 24 hours 7 days automated machine traffic counts with vehicle classification.

E. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall develop and implement new timing plans optimized for signal synchronization.

F. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall provide updated timing plans for all control systems and all relevant data used to develop said plans to the PARTICIPATING AGENCY.

G. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall prepare a conceptual plan for the delivery of the PROJECT. The AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, shall provide all reports to the PARTICIPATING AGENCY in draft and final formats for review and comment. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY comments shall be noted in the final report.

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

H. The AUTHORITY shall provide oversight to maintain inter-jurisdictional traffic signal operational integrity between the PROJECT and other signal synchronization projects not older than three (3) years from the effective date of this Agreement.

I. The AUTHORITY shall provide formats, templates, and guidance in reporting requirements necessary for the PROJECT.

J. The AUTHORITY, or agents of AUTHORITY, under this Agreement and upon closeout of PROJECT, may perform a technical and/or field review to ensure that the CMAQ guidelines, policies, and procedures were followed.

ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTICIPATING AGENCY The PARTICIPATING AGENCY agrees to the following responsibilities for implementation of the PROJECT:

A. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall designate a technical representative to meet and participate as a member of the PROJECT’s Traffic Forum , which is a technical working group with transportation staff from all Orange County cities, Caltrans, and AUTHORITY.

B. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall authorize the AUTHORITY to manage, procure, and implement all aspects of the PROJECT.

C. The PARTICIPATING AGENC Y shall p articipate and support the PROJECT implementation.

D. The PARTICIPATING AGENC Y shall provide the AUTHORITY, or agents of the AUTHORITY, all current intersection as -built drawings, all current intersections controller assembly plans as provided by the manufacturer and modified by the PARTICIPATING AGENCY since original installation, local field master, local controller, Advanced Traffic Management System timing plans , and other ITS-related data upon request.
/
/
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

E. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall inform the AUTHORITY of new traffic signal installations and any traffic signal modifications within the PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s jurisdiction, if such installations or modifications which materially affect the performance of the regional corridors on the PROJECT.

F. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall maintain in good condition existing traffic signal equipment for the PROJECT, such as signal communication and traffic signal controllers.

G. The PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall waive all fees associated with permits that would otherwise be required from the CONSULTANT, subconsultants, and/or service or equipment providers in the performance of the PROJECT.

ARTICLE 5. DELEGATED AUTHORITY
The actions required to be taken by the PARTICIPATING AGENCY in the implementation of this Agreement are delegated to its respective City Manager, or City Manager’s designee, and the actions required to be taken by the AUTHORITY in the implementation of this Agreement are delegated to the AUTHORITY’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Executive Officer’s designee.

ARTICLE 6. AUDIT AND INSPECTION
AUTHORITY shall maintain a complete set of records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Upon reasonable notice, PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall permit the authorized representatives of AUTHORITY to inspect and audit all work, materials, payroll, books, accounts, and other data and records of PARTICIPATING AGENCY for a period of five (5) years after final payment, final closeout, or until any on-going audit is completed, whichever is later. For purposes of audit, the date of completion of this Agreement shall be the date of AUTHORITY’s payment of CONSULTANT’s final billing (so noted on the paid invoice) under this Agreement. AUTHORITY shall have the right to reproduce any such books, records, and accounts. The above provision with respect to audits shall extend to and/or be included in contracts with AUTHORITY’S contractor.
/
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION
A. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall defend (at the PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s sole cost and expense with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the AUTHORITY), indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the AUTHORITY, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents (collectively the “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all liabilities, actions, suits, claims, demands, losses, costs, judgments, arbitration awards, settlements, damages, demands, orders, penalties, and expenses including legal costs and attorney fees (collectively “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims arising from injuries to or death of persons ( PARTICIPATING AGENCY’s employees included), for damage to property, including property owned by the AUTHORITY, or from any violation of any federal, state, or local law or ordinance, alleged to be caused by the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the PARTICIPATING AGENCY, its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this Agreement.

B. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the AUTHORITY shall defend (at the AUTHORITY’s sole cost and expense with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the PARTICIPATING AGENCY), indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the PARTICIPATING AGENCY, including their officers, directors, employees, and agents (collectively the “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all liabilities, actions, suits, claims, demands, losses, costs, judgments, arbitration awards, settlements, damages, demands, orders, penalties, and expenses including legal costs and attorney fees (collectively “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims arising from injuries to or death of persons (AUTHORITY’s employees included), for damage to property, including property owned by the PARTICIPATING AGENCY, or from any violation of any federal, state, or local law or ordinance, alleged to be caused by the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the AUTHORITY, its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this Agreement.

C. The indemnification and defense obligations of this Agreement shall survive its expiration or termination.
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

ARTICLE 8. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
A. Term of Agreement: This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the Effective Date through December 31, 2028.

B. Amendment: This Agreement may be extended or amended in writing at any time by the mutual consent of both Parties. No amendment shall have any force or effect unless executed in writing by all Parties.

C. Termination: In the event any P arty defaults in the performance of their respective obligations under this Agreement or breaches any of the provisions of this Agreement, the non-defaulting Party shall have the option to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the Party in default.

D. Termination for Convenience: Either Party may terminate this Agreement for its convenience by providing thirty (30) calendar days pr ior written notice of its intent to terminate for convenience to the other Party.

E. AUTHORITY and PARTICIPATING AGENCY shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statues, ordinances , and regulations of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the PROJECT.

F. Legal Authority: The Parties hereto consent that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Party and that, by so executing this Agreement, the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.

G. Severability: If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

H. Counterparts of Agreement: This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same Agreement. Facsimile/electronic signatures shall be permitted.

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

I. Assignment: Neither this Agreement, nor any of the Parties’ rights, obligations, duties, or authority hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party in its sole and absolute discretion. Any such attempt of assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment.

J. Governing Law: The laws of the State of California and applicable local and federal laws, regulations, and guidelines shall govern this Agreement. Venue shall be proper in Orange County, California.

K. Litigation Fees: Should litigation arise out of this Agreement for the performance thereof, the court shall award costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, to the prevailing Party.

L. Notices: Any notices, requests, or demands made between the Parties pursuant to this Agreement are to be directed as follows:

To PARTICIPATING AGENCY: To AUTHORITY:

City of Lake Forest Orange County Transportation Authority 100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630

550 South Main Street
P. O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
Attention: Tran Tran
Traffic Engineering Manager
Tel: (949) 461-3485
Email: [email protected]
Attention: Michael Le
Senior Contract Administrator
Tel: (714) 560-5314
Email: [email protected]

CC: Alicia Yang
OCTA Project Manager
Tel: (714) 560-5362
Email: [email protected]
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

M. Force Majeure: Either Party shall be excused from performing its obligations under this Agreement during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood; ac ts of God; commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government; national fuel shortage; or a material act or omission by the other Party, when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other Party, and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the Party not performing. /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-3-2427

COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION BASELINE PROJECT

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement No. C-3-2427 to be executed as of the date of the last signature below.

CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

By: ___________________________ By: __________________________________ Doug Cirbo Meena Katakia
Mayor Manager, Capital Projects

Dated: _________________________ Dated: _________________________ ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ___________________________ By: __________________________________ Lisa Berglund James M. Donich
City Clerk General Counsel

Dated: _________________________ Dated: _________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM

By: ___________________________
Matthew Richardson
City Attorney

Dated: _________________________

James Donich (Aug 28, 2023 12:24 PDT)

Attachment 2

Final Report
C-O-2172 / November 8, 2021
In association with

i | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 PART I – EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 5 2009 TSSMP REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 6 AGENCY INPUT TO 2021 UPDATE...................................................................................................................................... 9 FUNDED PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES .............................................................................................................................................. 15 INVENTORY ................................................................................................................................................................. 19 STAFFING RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................................... 22 SIGNAL TIMING APPROACH AND POLICIES ......................................................................................................................... 24 NETWORK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................................................. 24 CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................................................................. 27 NATIONAL SCAN .......................................................................................................................................................... 29 PART II – 2021 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION MASTER PLAN ..................................................................... 31 VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................... 32 TSSMP COMPONENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 33 TRAINING PROGRAM..................................................................................................................................................... 47 PARTICIPATION AND COORDINATION AMONG AGENCIES ...................................................................................................... 50 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................................................................... 51 AGENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR FUNDING ELIGIBILITY ............................................................................................................. 52 SUMMARY OF ACTION ITEMS .......................................................................................................................................... 54 APPENDIX A – EXCERPT FROM MEASURE M ORDINANCE ...................................................................................... A APPENDIX B – EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT AGENCY SURVEY ................................................ B APPENDIX C – COUNTYWIDE INVENTORY .............................................................................................................. C APPENDIX D – NATIONAL SCAN ............................................................................................................................ D

TABLES
Table 1 - Signalized Intersections by Agency ............................................................................................................... 16 Table 2 - Agency Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................ 19 Table 3 - 2017 Countywide Corridor Operational Performance .................................................................................. 27 Table 4 - Summary of Action Items ............................................................................................................................. 54

ii | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

FIGURES
Figure 1 - Orange County Traffic Signal Synchronization Network ................................................................................ 4 Figure 2 - Funded Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects (2008 - Present) ................................................................ 11 Figure 3 - Orange County Signal Synchronization Network Signals - By Call ............................................................... 13 Figure 4 - Orange County Signal Synchronization Network Signals by Frequency of Timing ...................................... 14 Figure 5 - Orange County Agencies.............................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 6 - Percentage of Signals in Program by Agency ............................................................................................... 18 Figure 7 - Type of Communications ............................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 8 - Type of Detection ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Figure 9 - Type of Controllers ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 10 - Percentage of Signals with Battery Backup .............................................................................................. 22 Figure 11 - Percentage of Intersections with CCTV Cameras ...................................................................................... 22 Figure 12 - Number of FTE Staff for Signal O&M in Orange County ............................................................................ 22 Figure 13 - How Staff Time is Spent Among Tasks ....................................................................................................... 23 Figure 14 - Number of Agencies That Use Each Method for Signal Timing ................................................................ 23 Figure 15 - Percentage of Agencies ............................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 16 - North and South County Cycle Lengths ..................................................................................................... 26 Figure 17 - Draft Zone Map.......................................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 18 - Phasing and Estimated Annual Cost Distribution ...................................................................................... 44

VERSION DATE AUTHOR REVIEWER
Outline 8/10/2020 M. Hewitt S. Chakravarthy
Draft 4/9/2021 S. Chandrasekhar,
R. Miller, M. Hewitt S. Chakravarthy
Draft 4/29/2021 S. Chandrasekhar,
R. Miller
M. Hewitt,
S. Chakravarthy
Final 11/8/2021 S. Chandrasekhar,
M. Hewitt S. Chakravarthy

1 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE
The Traffic Signal Synchronization M aster Plan (TSSMP) for Oran ge County provides standards, guidelines, and policies necessary for the implementation of the Renewed Measure M Project P - Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP). The TSSMP was developed cooperatively with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), all 34 incorporated cities within the County, the County of Orange, and the California Department of Transporta tion (Caltrans) District 12. Technical review and direction was provided by a Steering Committee consisting of a representative group of stakeholders from the cities of Anaheim, Buena Park, Irvine, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, and Seal Beach.

The 2021 update will replace the 200 9 TSSMP that has governed and guided the successful countywide program for more than a decade. The TSSMP is being updated based on an assessment of the outcomes and performance of the first decade of the program and national best practices with an eye toward addressing revised priorities, the current economic environment, and the potential to improve the system performance in the coming years.

BACKGROUND

MEASURE M FUNDING
On November 7, 2006, nearly 70 percent of Orange County voters approved the renewal of Measure M (Orange County Local Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 2) – a local half-cent transportation sales tax – for an additional 30 years beginning in the year 2011. Renewed Measure M (also known as M2 or branded externally as OC Go ), per the Orange County Local Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3, was expected to raise $11.8 billion to improve Orange County’s transportation system. Of this amount, approximately $450 million was allocated to the RTSSP (or Project P) and intended to improve the performance of approximately 2,000 signalized intersections along 750 miles of arterial corridors.

A minimum of 20 percent local agency match consisting of cash or in-kind services is required to receive funding under the Project P. Funding is also dependent on the agency (or agenc ies) meeting certain criteria mandated within Ordinance No. 3.

To promote cooperative regional decision -making, Renewed Measure M created requirements that encouraged coordination of traffic signals across jurisdictional lines. Orange County agencies that operate traffic signals are required by the ordinance to work together across agency boundaries toward the successful implementation of traffic signal synchronization in

2 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
order to participate in any Renewed Measure M Program (not just Project P). The excerpt of Ordinance No. 3 for Project P is included in Appendix A. 200 9 TSSMP OVERVIEW
The 2009 TSSMP was initially developed to define and guide the management of the RTSSP, as required by Renewed Measure M. It included details such as which signals would be synchronized (or eligible for synchronization) , what physical and technology improvements would be eligible to be funded as a part of the Program, how the Program would be monitored to provide accountability for the investments, and how OCTA, the administrator of Rene wed Measure M and this Plan, would prioritize corridors to be retimed.

A 2006 OCTA study, Orange County Traffic Signal Coordination Program, defined a network of major arterial highways known as the Oran ge County Signal Synchronization Network (OCSSN) (as shown in Figure 1) that included just over 2,000 signals. The network includes most of the six- lane or larger arterials in the County and most of the four -lane arterials that are served by freeway interchanges.

The primary components of the 2009 TSSMP that were key in managing the program for the last decade are summarized below.
♦ Crossing arterial grid approach : corridors were timed with consideration of crossing arterials;
♦ Standardized subregional cycle lengths: 100 to 120 seconds in north Orange County, and 130 to 140 seconds in south Orange County;
♦ Performance monitoring : Corridor Signal Performance Index (CSPI) was defined consisting of a composite score of average speed, greens per red, and stops per mile , measured during sample AM peak, PM peak, and midday (and in some cases a weekend peak) travel time runs annually;
♦ CSPI goal: it was a primary goal of the TSSMP to maintain a CSPI of 70 or better on all corridors; and,
♦ Operations and maintenance : the TSSMP provided consultant time to assist with monitoring of the signal synchronization.

3 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
The 2009 TSSMP has guided the successful program for over a decade. Project P has provided the resources to improve the flow of traffic in the County by developing and impl ementing signal coordination on key corridors. Improved signal timing helps drivers encounter more green lights than red lights while driving along Orange County’s arterial street system. This ongoing program supports the review and update of signal synchr onization based on current traffic patterns over time and funds the implementation of new technologies and equipment that improve the quality of traffic signal operation.

Data Source: OCTA, June 2021
Program Overview – 2008 to 2019
89 signal
synchronization
projects
3,003
signalized
intersections
$64.81
million grant
allocations
772
centerline
miles

919
million pounds in
greenhouse gas
reduction
13%
reduction in
travel time
14%
improvement in
travel speed
29%
reduction in
number of stops
$178.4
million savings on
fuel costs

4 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Figure 1 - Orange County Traffic Signal Synchronization Network

Not to Scale

5 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

PART I – EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ASSESSMENT

6 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
2009 TSSMP REVIEW
The 2009 TSSMP was crafted around a vision statement as follows:
“In the year 2011 and beyond, Orange County’s major arterials are synchronized as an actively managed element of the broader transportation system, providing enhanced mobility to the County’s travelers. Travelers experience reliable speeds, more green lig hts than red, and fewer stops per mile regardless of north-south or east-west configuration. Travelers have the impression that the streets are well coordinated through the regular experience of stopping less frequently. The mobility on key arterials is ba lanced with minimum cross -street delays, giving travelers the impression that the overall system is optimized.” The program established objectives to deliver its vision. Primary objectives included:
♦ An interagency approach where boundaries between cities and crossing of state highways were transparent to the network. This would be accomplished through projects that involved multiple jurisdictions and spanned across agency boundaries. The project priority system provided for greater priority weights for p rojects that met the goal.
♦ Comprehensive timing every three years. The three- year interval is generally accepted as the appropriate duration between retiming of traffic signals based upon industry best practice. It would be adequate where traffic volumes are stable and land use changes are not dramatic. This interval can also incorporate suggested national and state guidelines that underlie signal timing practices, such as pedestrian walking speed and duration of yellow intervals. A more frequent interval for retiming may be appropriate where traffic conditions are changing, streets are improved, or new traffic signals are constructed.

Even if conditions are deemed largely unchanged, a comprehensive review of the system is appropriate to verify that it is working at optimum performance. ♦ Control point timing. This concept was intended to establish a program that would allow agencies to retime within their jurisdictions by setting guidelines for how signals would be optimally timed at major crossing intersections.
♦ Common cycle lengths. North Orange County cycle length: 100 – 120 seconds and south Orange C ounty cycle length: 130 – 140 seconds. Cycle lengths for traffic signals are generally determined by the time required to serve pedestrian crossings, plus additional time to serve left turn phases and additional time to serve motor vehicle where the flow rate is greater than the time provided for pedestrians. The overall size of the intersecting

7 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
roadways is a substantial component of this calculation. Intersections in the south Orange C ounty tend to be larger, because the roadways are newer and provide more travel and turn lanes. These cycle length ranges recommended in 2009 were based on determining optimum cycle lengths for each half of the county (generally divided by the SR 55 corridor) and suggesting a value that would serve approximately 90 percent of the signals in the area. The use of a common cycle length can provide great benefits for traffic signal coordination in all directions, because it potentially limits the amount of time that a platoon of vehicles arrives at an intersection just after the traffic signal turns red. ♦ Capital Improvement, System Improvement, and Maintenance . During the development of the 2009 TSSMP , much of the traffic signal infrastructure did not have the basic capabilities to allow for delivery of the program goals. M any signals were not capable of coordinated operation or lacked communication with a central control system.

Few agencies had operable programs for interagency traffic signal operation that would allow for agency boundaries to be transparent. In response, the program anticipated that a substantial investment in traffic signal equipment and communication hardware would be required. It forecast that revenues would likely be spent at 70 percent for equipment upgrades and 30 percent for signal timing and operations in the first three years to allow traffic signals to be brought into the program as quickly as possible so that hardware and communication capabilities would not be program obstacles after a few years. The 2009 TSSMP established suggested policies for how eligible activities would be funded. These guidelines were relatively broad and flexible and could be tuned to the funding available and the highest priority needs.
♦ Workforce and Training. This was identified as a high need based upon the respo nse of agencies in 2009. A basic knowledge of traffic signal timing coupled with specific knowledge of the equipment on the street was important. Also, the technology for communication to traffic signals has been changing rapidly, from simple on/off circuits to use of computer network tools and video systems at intersections. Many agencies were not able to devote more than a partial block of time from a single staff member, so a training program was suggested to allow for development of skills and transf er of duties to new employees as needed.
♦ Regular Monitoring. The 2009 TSSMP indicated that a program of regular monitoring would be conducted to provide regular assessment of the success of the program and the performance of the corridors. The program would use the CSPI that is based upon the project vision statement, to monitor the speed and number of stops along each corridor.

8 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Corridors typically score between 50 and 100 on the CSPI scale through a process of driving the length of each corridor multiple times during hours of importance to measure travel times and delays. Its components include average speed, stops per mile, and ratio of green lights to red lights. CSPI scores would be generated with each project and OCTA would obtain or collect CSPI scores to provide a snapshot of how the county was performing. Key program performance goals included: maintain a CSPI of 70 or better, reduce stops and delay by 10-25%, and improve conditions for 600 miles of roadway and over 2000 intersections.

The project team conducted an assessment of how the basic elements, goals, and objectives of the 2009 TSSMP evolved over the past decade. Key findings include the following:
♦ The amount of funding expended on equipment, including traffic signal contro llers, communication, and surveillance met the forecasted 70 percent share in the first three years and then continued at that level throughout the decade. Traffic signal retiming used about 20 percent of the program funds, and operations and maintenance and program overhead (10 percent) rounded out the total.
♦ The countywide average CSPI score on the corridors monitored through the OCTA monitoring activities for all time periods is above 60. Thirty -one percent of all corridors are higher than the desire d CSPI score of 70. These results show a strong increase in arterial performance across the county as a result of the program. ♦ As of June 2021, t he program has funded 89 projects affecting 772 centerline miles of roadway and 3,003 signalized intersections. While the program had a goal of retiming the signals every three years, only a portion were timed more than once through the program. The competitive nature of the call for projects by design limits the programs’ ability to regularly retime all of the signals on the network every three years. ♦ The majority of signalized intersections eligible under the program are now capable of central communication and control due to the program funding communications and central systems. Many intersections feature CCTV cameras and advanced performance monitoring systems, so that time required in the field is reduced. ♦ Cycle lengths were determined for each corridor as it was funded. The identified cycle length was often within the expected range, but the amount of variation was greater than desired. Federal and state guidelines for timing of traffic signals resulted in the need to increase the time to walk across signalized crosswalks resulting in the need to increase needed cycle times by 15 to 20 seconds at typical large intersections. Other national and

9 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
state guidelines changes affecting yellow clearance intervals and minimum green time for bicyclists also were introduced in the past 10 years.
♦ Some elements of the workforce and training element were provided. Agenc ies seeking personalized advice could get it through direct requests to OCTA . Much of the initial programing and system upgrade operability was performed by the consultant team, the construction contractor, or the vendor of new software and hardware.

The program was very successful in providing traffic signal synchronization, improving the performance of arterials, and providing a funding source for supportive communication and equipment needed to modernize intersection controls, communication, surveillance, and provide for multi-agency capability.

AGENCY INPUT TO 2021 UPDATE
Agency input was sought to inform the 202 1 TSSMP update. A survey and associated pair of workshops were conducted virtually to collect updated inventory and input regarding future direction, needs and constraints from transportation agencies in Orange County . The survey template is provided in Appendix B.

Agencies were provided with a draft map and associated table that summarized the inventory of equipment in their jurisdiction in order to update the countywide inventory . This database provided a basis for evaluation of the physical elements of the program such as what percentage of signals have communications. This existing traffic signal data was developed based on the draft Local Signal Synchronization Plans (LSSPs
1) available at the time (summer 2020) and other
sources. Draft maps showing existing communications infrastructure were developed from OCTA GIS shapefiles compiled for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Strategic Deployment Plan (2019 Update). Agencies were asked to update or revise the content to reflect the complete current inventory.

The OCTA database was also updated with the addition of signal ized cross streets, cabinet type, type of detection, CCTV type, power backup, and time of day ( AM, midday, PM, and weekend )

1 LSSPs are updated every three years. Draft LSSP data was used to develop the draft maps because of the timing of the survey distribution. Subsequently, the final LSSPs were reviewed in parallel with the survey responses to create the final maps.

10 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
cycle lengths. Missing OCTA identification numbers were added and various signal nodes that were not included in the LSSPs were updated where data was available. Thirty-four agencies (of 36) responded with updates or that the information was already complete and accurate.

Further, the survey requested information about staff resources, signal timing policies and approaches, alternate solutions/supplements to traditional timing, and opinions on the quality of signal operations in the agency and county. The survey feedback was used to develop the summary information in this report.

FUNDED PROJECTS
Over the course of the first decade of Project P, it became apparent that in order to effectively synchronize corridors, adjacent intersections often had to be i ncluded. While the original signal synchronization network defined in 2006 included approximately 2,000 intersections, ultimately signal synchronization was implemented for 89 projects that included 3,003 signalized intersections (with some intersections timed more than once) and 772 centerline miles of streets over the first decade of the program (as of June 2021). Figure 2 shows which corridors have been funded since 2008.

11 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Figure 2 - Funded Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects (2008 - Present)

Source: OCTA, June 2021

12 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Early in the program, many projects were along long er and more regionally significant arterial corridors involving multiple agencies and featuring extensive equipment upgrades. The upgrades were often necessary to migrate to state -of-the-art communication systems and to replace controllers that were nearing or beyond their useful life as supportive to the signal synchronization.

As the program moved forward through the years, additional corridors were nominated for funding. These projects were more likely to receive funding in the latter years because the more competitive corridors (highest volume and longest corridors) were funded in the earlier years.

In the last few years, some of the earlier projects were proposed and received a second round of funding. These repeat- funded projects still tended to have substantial equipment upgrades included, often to add features that were not available in the earliest years of the program or to fund upgrades that were deemed to be eligible as the program progressed, including emergency vehicle preemption systems and uninterruptable power supplies that provide power during utility disruptions.

Of the traffic signals included in the program as part of Project P Calls 1 through 10 over the past decade, 51 percent of signals included were in the first four years (2011 to 2014), 23 percent of signals were included in the next three years (2015 to 2017) , and 26 percent of signals were included in the recent three years (2018 to 2020). The number of signals being timed decreased as a result of the per intersection equipment cost cap being increased (more equipment was purchased, resulting in fewer number of locations). Figure 3 shows the signals included by call.

Over the past decade, of all signals included in the OCSSN, 22 percent of signals were included in two or more calls, 60 percent of signals were included in just one call, and 18 percent of signals were never included. About half of those that were not included are Caltrans signals. Caltrans has their own funding and schedule for ma king intersection improvements and timing and as such has not partnered with agencies to use Project P to complete improvements. It should be noted that while Caltrans is ineligible from submitting applications for corridors, they are able to accept Measu re M funding as a part of an application submitted by another agency. This ineligibility to author an application is a likely reason for the majority of the Caltrans signals on the network not being funded through Project P as another agency would be unlikely to apply for funding on a state facility such as Beach Boulevard. Figure 4 shows how often each signal was included in a project funded through an annual call for projects.

13 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Last Updated: March 2021
Figure 3 - Orange County Signal Synchronization Network Signals - By Call

Not to Scale

14 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Last Updated: March 2021
Figure 4 - Orange County Signal Synchronization Network Signals by Frequency of Timing Not to Scale

15 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
OCTA’s partnering agencies for the R TSSP within Orange County includes 34 cities, County of Orange, and Caltrans District 12. Based on geography, two regions were established in the 2009 Plan: North County and South County as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 - Orange County Agencies
Based on the inventory received as part of the LSSP update and agency input collected for the 2021 TSSMP update (as of June 2021), a total of 3, 653 signalized intersections have been identified within Orange County. Out of all the signalized intersections within the County, 2,555

16 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
signals have been identified as part of the OCSSN. The total number of intersections by agency is tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1 - Signalized Intersections by Agency
Agency No. of Intersections
in LSSP*
No. of
Intersections
not in LSSP*
Total Agency
Intersections
Total Agency
Intersections on OC SSN
Caltrans, District 12 335 139 474 413
City of Aliso Viejo 48 - 48 30
City of Anaheim 300 30 330 231
City of Brea 49 3 52 38
City of Buena Park 85 1 86 59
City of Costa Mesa 126 1 127 77
City of Cypress 47 12 59 39
City of Dana Point 20 17 37 31
City of Fountain Valley 58 - 58 42
City of Fullerton 153 4 157 133
City of Garden Grove 101 32 133 102
City of Huntington
Bh
83 61 144 79
City of Irvine 372 4 376 245
City of La Habra 35 - 35 26
City of La Palma 21 2 23 13
City of Laguna Beach** - - - -
City of Laguna Hills 50 - 50 40
City of Laguna Niguel 76 2 78 66
City of Laguna Woods 14 - 14 14
City of Lake Forest 93 1 94 64
City of Los Alamitos 19 2 21 18
City of Mission Viejo 110 - 110 88
City of Newport Beach 120 4 124 49
City of Orange 100 60 160 106
City of Placentia 63 1 64 47
City of Rancho Santa
M it
50 - 50 21
City of San Clemente 80 - 80 51
City of San Juan
C it
37 - 37 11
City of Santa Ana 251 15 266 188
City of Seal Beach 21 2 23 16
City of Stanton 13 2 15 11
City of Tustin 132 - 132 81
City of Villa Park 2 5 7 2
City of Westminster 59 3 62 44
City of Yorba Linda 62 5 67 40
County of Orange 57 3 60 40
Total 3,242 411 3,653 2,555
*Last Updated: September 11, 2020
** City of Laguna Beach signals operated and maintained by Caltrans

17 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
As shown in Table 1, approximately 40 percent of signals in the County are owned/operated by four (4) agencies – Caltrans District 12 and cities of Anaheim, Irvine, and Santa Ana.

The proportion of signals wit hin each agency is a partial indicator of how wide a reach the program has made through the County. Figure 6 shows the proportion of signals for each agency that have been upgraded or retimed under the program. It shows that some agencies have taken advantage of the program for at least 90 percent of their eligible signals. Participation levels by other agencies range from 30 percent to 85 percent. Some agencies with lower participatio n levels may have concluded that their existing equipment and resources were adequate.

18 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Figure 6 - Percentage of Signals in Program by Agency

19 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Table 2 defines the roles of OCTA as the program administrator and participating agencies as owners and operators of traffic signals.

Table 2 - Agency Roles and Responsibilities
Agency Role
OCTA Administers Project P, provides technical su pport to local agencies as needed, and provides project management services for corridor projects when requested by local agencies.

Caltrans Owns and operates traffic signals at off -ramp termini and on most segments of state highways; as such Caltrans’ signals are interspersed in nearly every major TSSP corridor.

County of Orange Owns and operates traffic signals in unincorporated County jurisdiction; as such County’s signals are interspersed in many major TSSP corridors
Local Agencies Own and operate traffic signals in their jurisdictions; in some cases, manage Project P projects (in other cases, projects are requested to be managed by OCTA); coordinate with Caltrans and adjacent agencies in signal operations.

INVENTORY
The following summarizes the physical inventory of field equipment and communications in the county as reported through the LSSPs in summer 2020. The complete inventory is provided in Appendix C.

20 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

COMMUNICATIONS
As shown in Figure 7,
approximately 75 percent of
signalized intersections within the
LSSP database have hardline
communication infrastructure.

Another four percent have other
forms of communication.

Approximately 18.3 percent of
signalized intersections of the
network do not have any form o f
communication.

DETECTION
As shown in Figure 8, approximately 67 percent of
the intersections in the LSSP database are
outfitted with loop detection. Another 17.5
percent are using video. Approximately 12 percent
of the intersections do not have any form of
vehicle detection. Lane by lane detection is a
critical aspect of advanced technology/big data
approaches to performance monitoring . A review
of the inventory indicates that substantial
detection upgrades would be required for
agencies to have the capabilities to monitor signal
performance using an Automated Traffic Signal
Performance Measures ( ATSPM) tool to its full
potential.

Figure 7 - Type of Communications
Figure 8 - Type of Detection

21 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

CONTROLLERS
Figure 9 shows that a combination of 2070 & ASC/3 controllers currently account for over 62 percent of controllers within Orange County. While some of these controllers may have ATSPM2 capabilities, to get a more accurate inventory of ATSPM capable controllers/software, it is suggested that OCTA provide pre-set terminology for various inputs within the LSSP tables.

2 ATSPM is one type of advanced technology for monitoring performance of intersections. This approach requires data from advanced transportation controllers (ATC).

Figure 9 - Type of Controllers

22 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
OTHER
Additional inventory was received for controller power back -up (shown in Figure 10) and CCTV cameras (shown in Figure 11).

STAFFING RESOURCES
On average, agencies in the county have 1.3 full time equivalent (FTE) staff devoted to traffic signal timing operations and maintenance (the median is one FTE per agency). Figure 12 shows that 11 agencies, or 33 percent, have more than one staff person; another 30 percent (10 agencies) have between one-fourth and one FTE; and the remaining 37 percent (12 agencies) have fewer than one-fourth of an FTE dedicated for this purpose.

Figure 12 - Number of FTE Staff for Signal O&M in Orange County Figure 10 - Percentage of Signals with
Battery Backup
Figure 11 - Percentage of Intersections
with CCTV Cameras

23 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Of the staff time available , an average of 14 hours per week is spent on signal timing or signal synchronization maintenance ( as shown in Figure 13); 5 hours on performance monitoring, 12 hours on equipment maintenance in the field, 10 hours on responding to citizen complaints, and 8 hours on other activities.

To accomplish traffic signal timing,
agencies use in -house staff,
consultants and/or OCTA. Very few
agencies use only one approach (18
percent or six agencies); 91 percent
use consultants at some point or
another (15 percent use solely
consultants); and 24 percent use all
three methods. The proportion of
agencies that use each method is
shown in Figure 14.

Staffing was the top issue noted by
agencies in the existing conditions
and needs assessment survey.

Nearly 70 percent of agencies
identified a lack of available resources as a major challenge inhibiting deployment and maintenance of traffic signal synchronization.

Signal Timing
Signal
Synchronization
Maintenance
Performance
Monitoring
Equipment
Maintenance
Citizen Complaints
Other
Figure 13 - How Staff Time is Spent Among Tasks

Figure 14 - Number of Agencies That Use
Each Method for Signal Timing
7 hrs/
week
7 hrs/
week
5 hrs/
week
12 hrs/
week
10 hrs/
week
8 hrs/
week
In-house
OCTA
Consultants
91%
50%
65%

24 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

SIGNAL TIMING APPROACH AND POLICIES
Very few agencies have rigid signal timing policies that impact or conflict with the program. Most agencies use the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) guidelines, several follow Caltrans’ standard, and some have established guidelines that are generally in compliance with CA MUTCD. These include policies related to Flash Don’t Walk (FDW ) interval, vehicle clearance intervals, minimum green, and other basic parameters . Time -of-Day (TOD) coordination plans are typically recommended and implemented for weekday AM, midday, PM, and weekend peak periods. Directional preference as
well as lead -lag phasing operation is considered
during the signal timing development. Additional
signal timing strategies are utilized on a case-by-case basis to improve operations at a specific intersection
or segment of a corridor.

Of the 60 percent of Orange County agencies that
self-report to updating traffic signal timing on a
regular basis, the majority fall into two categories:
half retime less than every two years and half in the
three to five-year range (as shown in Figure 15). In
other words, only about 30 percent of the agencies in
the county are timing in the industry recommended
three-year interval.

Seventy percent of agencies (24 agencies) are
currently able to manage signals remotely. Of the other third (10 agencies), half expect to have remote capabilities in the future while the other half (5 agencies) do not have plans.

NETWORK ASSESSMENT
Synchro files were compiled based on the existing network and available completed RTSSP data.

The network was reviewed to identify:
♦ New/additional signalized intersection locations since last update, inclusive of all coordination and phase parameters (pede strian clearance intervals, yellow time, all- red time) for said intersections;
♦ Existing coordination parameters - cycle lengths, splits, and offsets; and ♦ Regional cross corridor locations.

Figure 15 - Percentage of Agencies
That Retime Signals with Various Frequencies

25 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Corridors were reviewed on a mile-by-mile basis to accurately represent the operation along the corridor in its entirety. Reviewing on a mile-by-mile basis allows the project team to focus on the corridor as a whole while still being able to understand the current operating conditions and to home in on the facets of the network, especially at major corridor locations and cross coordination locations.

Due to irregular travel patterns as a result of the Governor’s COVID-19 shelter-at-home order at the time of the evaluation, volume balancing techniques and available historical data were used to supplement the review where needed rather than collecting new traffic counts in 2020.

Existing cycle lengths were reviewed in comparison with the recommend cycle length in the 2009 TSSMP. The 200 9 TSSMP recommended North County have cycle lengths between 100-120 seconds and South County have cycle lengths between 130-140 seconds. Figure 16 summarizes cycles lengths for North and South County based on the LSSP and inventory findings.

26 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

NORTH COUNTY
AM Cycle Length
PM Cycle Length

SOUTH COUNTY
AM Cycle Length
PM Cycle Length

Figure 16 - North and South County Cycle Lengths

This data indicates that South County agencies are running approximately a third of traffic signals on free operation, and the majority of others have irregular cycle lengths. This could be due to many factors including terrain, longer spacing between signalized intersections, limited roadway network, and remote locations with light traffic volumes. North County is operating on more consistent cycle lengths with less than 20% running free. The grid network , terrain, and shorter distance between intersections in North County may attribute to the consistency.

27 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE
In 2018, OCTA completed a study of the operational performance of the Orange County network.

Similar studies were completed in 2011 and 2015. The most recent study ( 2017 Corridor Operational Performance Report , completed April 2018) included a measurement of the CSPI score for 90 study corridors. These represent a comprehensive sample of corridor performance on the network. The CSPI was calculated for each corridor, surveying both directions during the AM, midday and PM peaks. The study included the CSPI index and additional measurements of time spent idling at stops and Carbon Dioxide ( CO2) emissions. The countywide corridor performance index average was 57.6 during the AM peak, 67.3 during the midday peak, and 55 during the PM. Table 3 shows the 2017 countywide corridor operational performance during the AM, midday an PM peaks from the 2018 report.

Table 3 - 2017 Countywide Corridor Operational Performance

The earlier corridor performance monitoring reports developed a tier system, categorizing the CSPI into five levels - Tiers I to V, to signify how specific corridors performed with respect to all corridors surveyed. Tier I (with a CSPI score at or above 80) was the tier that included the best performing corridors, while Tier V (with a CSPI score lower than 50) indicated that the corridor would greatly benefit from improvements to signal synchronization.

During the AM peak period, 19 corridors measured above a CSPI score of 70 which was the target goal of the 2009 TSSMP (classified as Tier I and Tier II). Twenty corridors were at Tier III, near the average, and 51 corridors were at a CSPI score of 60 or less. Most of the top tier corridors were in the South County. Most of the North County was rated at a CSPI score of 60 or below.

Source: 2017 Corridor Operational Performance Report, OCTA, 2018

28 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
During the midday peak, 40 corridors were above a CSPI score of 70, while 36 were below a CSPI score of 60. Corridors scoring high, above a CSPI score of 70, were located throughout the County and included routes with high daily traffic levels. Routes scoring average or below were also distributed throughout the County.

During the PM peak , 16 corridors were above a CSPI score of 70, while 52 were below a CSPI score of 60. Most high scoring routes were in the S outh County but included heavily used arterials, such as Crown Valley Parkway and Alicia Parkway. Similar to the AM peak, most of the North County routes scored at a CSPI of 60 or below. The study also evaluated performance along subsegments of the corridors . It found that there was a wide variation in performance along the more poorly performing corridors. This included segments with high CSPI scores and other segments with lower scores. The 2018 report concluded that the overall CSPI was likely brought do wn by the performance along subsets of the corridor. This may have focused on problematic segments of the corridors where stops and delays were more frequent.

The report also compared the results to the
previous summary reports (baseline conditions in
2011 and Year 2015) . The results do not reflect
substantial changes. The overall average speed for
all corridors declined from 25 to 24 miles per hour.

Green-to-red ratio remained unchanged at 1.8
stops per mile for all three surveys. Stops were
measured at 1.2 red signals per mile in the years
2011 and 2015 but increased to 1.5 in 2017. Most
of the North County arterial grid features major
roadway every mile. The results would suggest that
most motorists will stop at each major crossing
arterial and are likely to stop half of the time at one intersection in between. The report reminds that
traffic volumes have increased since the onset of
the program, so some decline may occur if there are
no interventions.

The report stratified the analysis into corridors
that had significant investments in the OCTA
RTSSP and those that had not been upgraded. The performance of the corridors with RTSSP projects was better than the corridors without significant upgrades or retiming activity. Twenty- three of the 90 corridors had not participated in the program as of 2018. Many of these corridors Source: 2017 Corridor Operational Performance Report,
OCTA, 2018

29 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
are not heavily used, but a few noted corridors are major 6-lane arterials that travel through freeway interchanges.

A typically poor performing corridor may experience an average speed of under 20 miles per hour, with 1.2 greens per red and two or more stops per mile. Apparent reasons for stopping included traffic signals not being coordinated, change in cycle length at a crossing arterial, back- ups related to congestion from high traffic volumes (resulting in two approach stops to clear one intersection), and communication syst em failures reported by the operating agency. In comparison, a corridor scoring in a top tier would typically have three green signals for each red signal and one or fewer stops per mile. The average speed would range from 28 to 32 miles per hour.

The CSPI score provides value in indicating the relative performance of the system and corridors.

However, questions have been raised whether heavily used arterials in North County can achieve the CSPI target scores identified in the 2009 TSSMP (70 or higher) using the traditional metrics of average speed, greens per red, and stops per mile. There is value in moving to a system that can calculate other performance metrics , potentially in an automated manner comprising of larger data sets than the typical floating car travel time runs.

NATIONAL SCAN
National research was conducted to review different signal synchronization programs across the nation to inform potential improvements, approaches, and strategies that could help enhance OCTA’s RTSSP. This summary focuses on the organizational approach, operational characteristics, technology and signal data utilization, and any other relevant information of the different programs. The following programs were reviewed:
♦ Los Angeles (LA) County TSSP and Contract Operations and Maintenance ♦ San Bernardino Valley Coordinated Traffic Signal System (SBVCTSS) ♦ San Francisco Bay Area Program for Arterial System Synchronization (PASS) and Related Bay Area Programs
♦ Maricopa County (Arizona) programs
♦ Southern Nevada’s Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation (FAST) and ♦ Georgia Department of Transportation (G DOT) Regional Traffic Operations Program (RTOP) and Regional Traffic Signal Operations (RTSO)
A detailed overview of each program is provided in Appendix D. The following is a short summary

30 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
of findings and lessons learned for potential consideration in Orange County:
♦ LA County offers traffic signal maintenance and operations support to local agencies on a voluntary and paid basis . Agencies can choose what level of support is desired (e.g., equipment maintenance, traffic signal operations, etc.) and the County enters into a contract with each agency based on a standard cost per signal for each type of service.

This is one method of addressing the resource challenges that agencies in Orange County have noted. LA County also offered a training program for many years that provided an opportunity for local agency staff and consultants to learn about topics relevant to synchronization such as timing basics, maintenance, and others. ♦ San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) has tried different approaches to encourage local agencies to keep coordination timing plans running such as providing an annual reimbursement to each agency that keeps the program signals online and coordinated. The program also sets aside funds to provide on -call support for troubleshooting signal operation equipment, as requested by local agencies. ♦ In the Las Vegas metropolitan area, operations have been con solidated into a single location, system, and agency with each partner agency paying a fair share of the operations cost based on number of signals. This is another method that could be considered to address resource challenges.
♦ The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the San Francisco Bay Area and Maricopa County (AZ) both have regional signal synchronization programs. These provide examples of the different approaches to programs. In the Bay Area, the local match requirement varies based on several factors including the regional significance of the corridor, transit service on the corridor, average daily traffic (ADT), and which agency manages the project (MTC or local agency). In Arizona, advanced technologies are being tested such as adaptive control to examine the performance and the impact on staff time.

In both cases, as with all of the other programs that were evaluated, the levels of available funding are lower than those for Orange County’s program. ♦ Georgia has been running a successful program for many years that is tied very closely to corridor performance, includes operations and maintenance, and is offered free of charge to local agencies. Corridors (in rural areas) and zones (in the Atlanta urban core) are managed through consultant contracts. A web-based ATSPM dashboard that is available to the general public shows how ongoing, proactive maintenance of the signal timing and equipment is keeping the performance of the system high.

31 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

PART II – 2021 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION

MASTER PLAN

32 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
The program vision serves as the foundation for the TSSMP as a guiding document for the future of the regional traffic signal synchronization program in Orange County. The vision reflects how the stakeholders view the priorities and principles that will shape how the program is managed and conducted over the next decade . The 2009 vision was updated based on input from stakeholders, OCTA’s experience managing the program over the last decade, the ordinance, and technological advances since the vision was first defined.

VISION

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The goals below describe the high- level focus areas for the overall program. The objectives further break down the big picture goals into specific, achievable components for the program. ♦ Goal 1. Achieve and maintain optimization of performance for traffic signals include d along the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) throughout Orange County ♦ Objective 1.1. Prioritize retiming of traffic signals within the program on a frequent and consistent basis (based on need, examined every 3 to 5 years) ♦ Objective 1.2. Maintain synchronization through monitoring and fine-tuning ♦ Objective 1.3. Maintain equipment and communications, capable of facilitating signal timing upgrades and in line with industry standards
♦ Goal 2. Reduce the strain on local agency resources
♦ Objective 2.1. Provide countywide training for topics related to traffic signal timing and maintenance
Orange County’s major arterials are synchronized as an actively-managed element of the broader transportation system, providing enhanced mobility to the County’s travelers.

Travelers experience reliable speeds, more green lights than red, and fewer stops per mile regardless of north-south or east-west configuration. The mobility on key arterials is balanced with minimum cross-street delays , giving travelers the impr ession that the overall system is optimized. The system is proactively managed and performance is measured and reported regularly, permitting fine-tuning of the timing such that progression is maintained.

33 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
♦ Objective 2.2. Test ideas for pooling and/or providing technical resources for traffic signal timing and monitoring/fine-tuning
♦ Objective 2.3. Continue to offer project management services by OCTA for individual consultant-led projects as desired by local agencies
♦ Goal 3. Balance program funding between traffic signal timing and equipment ♦ Objective 3.1. Develop and maintain a countywide inventor y of traffic signal equipment and communications
♦ Objective 3.2. Prioritize the funding to signal timing, but continue to provide funding for equipment upgrades
♦ Goal 4. Allow for other technologies such as advanced technology and/or big data performance m onitoring, traveler information, and connected/automated vehicle applications
♦ Objective 4.1. Develop a phased approach to wards advanced performance monitoring (e.g., ATSPM, using cloud-based data, etc.)
♦ Objective 4.2. Update and enhance performance metrics based on lessons learned ♦ Objective 4.3. Allow for funding of supportive technologies ♦ Goal 5. Share traffic signal timing data across jurisdictional boundaries

TSSMP COMPONENTS
This section describes the aspects of the TSSMP that were derived from the input of local and regional agencies, led by OCTA. The goals and objectives defined above are addressed through these components.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING
A call for projects i s held annually for Cities and the County to nominate projects that were competitive and likely to be funded based on the defined criteria in the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program ( CTFP) Guidelines. Th is approach has led to a successful program over the past 11 years. An assessment was conducted as a part of this plan to identify areas to further improve on the program. Th is section summarizes the outcomes of the assessment and the alternatives that were considered.

34 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Opportunities for Program Enhancement
The following are opportunities identified to further enhance the program:
♦ While over 3,000 signals were retimed over the first decade of Project P, in very few cases have traffic signals been retimed every three years as was the original intent: to regularly retime signals countywide (only 22 percent were included in more than one funded project and the majority of those are at major arterial crossing points as opposed to full corridors, as shown in Figure 4).
♦ Consequently, over time the performance of the corridors are degrading as very few of the signals have been retimed more than once (only 26 percentof the signals on the network have been retimed in the past three years, as shown in Figure 3). ♦ The program has benefitted some areas of the County more than others (more than 1/5th of the agencies have had fewer than 75 percent of their signals retimed and most of those were retimed only once in the past decade, as shown in Figure 6). ♦ Many agencies cited lack of resources as a challenge (both with staff time and matching funds).

35 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Alternatives
To address the short list of areas for enhancement identified above, two primary alternatives were considered:
♦ Alternative 1: Corridor Approach
♦ Keep the annual call for projects which includes timing, operations and maintenance (O&M), and equipment
♦ Applications are submitted by groups of partner agencies to fund corridors ♦ Resulting contracts include two years of timing maintenance or finetuning ♦ The guidelines for the call would be revised to reflect a prioritization of or set aside for projects that only consist of timing (not equipment) to address some of the opportunities for program enhancement noted above
♦ Alternative 2: Zone Approach
♦ The full signal synchronization network would be retimed to generate a base network and timing would be updated and maintained in zones
♦ The order of the zones would be developed on a competitive basis considering need, volumes, competing construction projects and other factors ♦ The signals within each zone would also be subject to a competitive assessment to determine which signals warrant full retiming versus those that may only need to be updated for improved traffic flow
♦ Contracts per zone would include three years of timing maintenance or fine -tuning such that all signals on the network countywide are being considered or monitored at all times (either in retiming or in maintenance over a four -year period until retiming again)
♦ An annual call for projects would competitively fund applications for signal operation equipment upgrades

36 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
To better meet the goals of the program and align it with the expectations of the Measure M voters, the zone approach (Alternative 2) is recommended by the Steering Committee 3. This approach appears to better align with the core objectives of the program – to regularly synchronize signals and provide a benefit countywide, to maintain a high level of performance (and hence return on investment), and to continue to fund the necessary equipment and communications needed to enable ongoing synchronization.

A draft zone map has been proposed and is shown in Figure 18. Three of the proposed zones are contiguous, and all contain approximately the same number of signalized intersections.

3 Technical review and direction was provided by a Steering Committee consisting of a representative group of stakeholders from the cities of Anaheim, Buena Park, Irvine, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, and Seal Beach.

A promising alternative approach to establish and maintain timing countywide in a more widespread, frequent, and efficient manner is based on dividing the county into zones that would be appropriate for retiming every four years. The zones would consist of large contiguous areas of the county that tend to have compatible timing needs based on the typical size of the roadways and the characteristics of the network. The program would be designed to reevaluate each zone every four years, which comes close to the original three-year target while balancing the Cities’ needs for adequate annual budget allocation for equipment. This timing would be followed by a three -year period of timing maintenance, which would allow timing to be efficiently maintained without gaps between retiming (every four years as needed).

It is anticipated that this approach would reduce the individual agency expense for traffic signal timing outside of the program.

37 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Figure 17 - Draft Zone Map
Caltrans facilities are located within each zone and often form boundaries between zones.

Caltrans has indicated that a more formal schedule for retiming would be desirable to allow them to program efforts compatible with work in adjacent zones . This may also help with achieving the objectives of engaging Caltrans with less cost to local agencies. ♦ Southeast Zone is generally the area south of Irvine. It includes all of the free -form grid of arterials in Lake Forest and the longer princip al corridors further south. The traffic

38 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
levels on many of these corridors are relatively low compared to their intersection size.

Hours per day of signal coordination needed to achieve high performance may be limited on lower volume corridors . However, major corridors that extend long distances from freeway interchanges are high enough that longer hours of coordination may be appropriate.
♦ South Zone generally, east of SR -55, consists of Irvine, Newport Beach, and portions of Orange, unincorporated area of North Tustin, Anaheim, Villa Park and T ustin. Irvine and Newport Beach both have large and challenging areas due to concentrations of employment. Relatively few arterials cross the zone border except through freeway interchanges or boundaries with substantial change in intersection size. ♦ Central Zone is the area of central Orange County that has a fairly regular one -mile grid of arterials. The larger intersections tend to be of similar size and carry similar volume levels. North/ south streets and east west streets often carry nearly the same volumes, so it is difficult to designate one orientation as more important than the other direction.

Beach Boulevard is identified as the west boundary, because it is a Caltrans facility , it is larger than most other county arterials, the intersections to the west have lower volumes and the grid naturally breaks due to the nearby coastline and geographic features. The other boundaries are along the SR-55 and SR -91. The interchanges would typical ly be contained within the zone that had nearby traffic signals or intersection sizes that are most compatible.
♦ Northwest Zone consists of two areas that are relatively independent of each other. The north sub-zone is generally north of the SR-91. Its intersection sizes and resultant signal cycle lengths tend to be lower than in nearby areas . Freeway ramps often represent optimum places to change the timing approach, since a high proportion of arterial trips either begin or end at freeway interchanges. The west subzone is generally west of Beach Boulevard, which is a State Highway with larger intersections than the areas to the west. The traffic signals to the west may be found to best coordinate in an optimized state independently of the border arterials that may require longer cycle lengths due to the size of the intersections and traffic volumes. Many of these roadways also have declining traffic volumes as the roadways extend further to the west and south.

The zone boundaries could be adjusted or refined as appropriate , but the approach of doing comprehensive retiming stud ies every thre e years for every intersection of importan ce within the zone will be helpful for attaining program performance goals. Some of the cities in the county have developed timing approaches that consider flow in all directions on heavi er used streets

39 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
where they cross. Often CSPI performance scores within these cities are better than for other areas where the corridor approach has not lent well to achieving performance in all directions at all times.

While the approach would potentially evaluate every intersection within the zone, the effort could likely be scoped to adjust the level of effort based upon the importance of the corrido rs and intersections. Corridors with relatively low traffic levels may already have good CSPI scores.

These can be identified at the onset of the zone study or identified by participating agencies as not needing an extensive timing analysis.

Related to traffic signal timing, a countywide inventory of emergency vehicle preem ption and other preemption equipment and systems that are in place would be helpful to evaluating the need for or potential to make this more consistent.

Action Items:
♦ Competitively evaluate the zones for phasing
♦ Coordinate the schedule with agencies (including Caltrans) to allow for annual budgeting ♦ Develop new Call for Projects for supportive capital expenses ♦ Inventory county including preemption equipment/systems

MAINTENANCE OF TIMING AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING
Agencies with limited resources have indicated that maintaining timing coordination can be challenging. In some cases, the local agency may have limited capability and is heavily reliant on signal maint enance con tractors to troubleshoot and correct problems. This can result in coordination being turned off. It also poses chall enges if new traffic signals are constructed or the operation of existing signals is changed by construction or new development and changed traffic patterns. As noted previously, the
corridor performance (currently measured
through CSPI) tends to degrade over time,
which indicates a need for a more focused
and consistent approach to finetuning in
order to maintain the return on
investment in the original timing efforts
and associated equipment costs.

The team responsible for t he comprehensive
timing would maintain a prominent role in
maintenance, fine tuning, and response to issues
over a three -year period following the initial
timing, which would effectively keep the signals
in each zone proactively and continuously
managed until the end of year four at which time
retiming would be conducted for the zone.

40 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Expanding the role of consultant assistance in the maintenance of signal timing is a potential solution. This could include addressing public inquiries, responding to localized traffic changes, and/or assisting in timing changes due to other needs .

Each agency often identifies different needs for maintaining of timing. Some agencies have traffic management centers that are staffed during hours of need. The level of support needed may be low, and the ability to use Traffic Management Center (TMC) for special traffic conditions may be unique to the agency. Other agencies have expressed interest in a desire to reduce demands upon staff by looking for more outside services. A customized approach can be tailored for each agency on a case-by-case basis.

To allow flexibility in its implementation, a loc al agency within a zone could request OCTA/Consultant to carry out the O&M phase or could take ownership of the O&M phase in house. In either of the options, the following would need to be guiding principles to allow for a successful execution of the O&M to maintain the performance of the zones:
♦ Continuous monitoring of travel patterns on a monthly basis of all major arterials, at a minimum, within the zone. Monitoring could include floating car travel time runs, automated travel time or other performance metrics data collection, observations during different peak periods, or other means acceptable to OCTA and participating agencies. ♦ Regular updates, at a minimum on a monthly basis, to the Project Development Team (PDT) of any changes to key signal timing parameters such as cycle lengths, offsets, splits, and signal phasing changes
♦ Monthly O&M memo documenting the observations, performance metrics, signal timing updates, and the resulting improvements to the PDT
♦ Other recommendations as determined by the PDT
Completion of these core actions for all agencies within the zone (whether the activities are conducted by a zone consultant or by an agency in- house) will allow the zone to stay at a high level of performance.

The program performance has been monitored us ing the CSPI calculated based on a limited set of sample travel time runs monthly (AM, midday, PM peak, and in some cases weekend) during the O&M phase of the projects . This has been the best method historically, but given the advancement of technology in recent years, there are more efficient, comprehensive, and accurate methods to monitor performance. Moving to a big data method (ATSPM or cloud-based data and analysis) will take time and require some comfort level with the results. As such , a

41 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
supplemental pilot study should be conducted before phasing in a full advanced performance monitoring solution.

Start with a pilot corridor or corridors (possibly several corridors in a regional zone) to demonstrate the feasibility of the ATSPM concepts and crowdsourced data. These pilot location(s) would include:
♦ Multiple controller types
♦ Multiple cabinet types
♦ Varying detection configurations and technologies, including optimal, routine, and insufficient
♦ Variance in operating efficiency of signals fr om highly saturated to low volume, infrequently used side streets
The pilot deployment duration should range from six months to a year with collection of probe travel time runs periodically to compare the CSPI metrics with the others computed from controller-based ATSPMs and crowdsourced data. After the pilot evaluation, assuming the information and results of the pilot are deemed successful, the system can be scaled across the County incrementally.

While it is not necessary to require agencies to standardize on a particular controller, cabinet, detection, communications, or Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) software provider, establishing several standards would be helpful for:
♦ Compliance of new controller purchases to support the Indiana Data Lo gger (IDL) 4 specifications for ATSPM data collection
♦ Compliance of new detection purchases to allow for lane -by-lane detection zones, advanced or exit zone configurations, and Application Programming Interfaces ( APIs) or interface provisions to allow for enough detection zones to be retrieved even if the cabinet type does not support enough channels

4 Indiana Data Logger (IDL) specifications describe a format for logging data specifications for events that are recorded in the ATSPM files that are stored on the controller

42 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
♦ Compliance of all new communications upgrades to support Internet Protocol ( IP) data transport at minimum speed to support both traffic controller data and video ♦ Use of a common solution at OCTA for standardization of computation of the metrics ♦ A common countywide data sharing architecture enabled by the standard Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs)
While the above pilot is being conducted, a concurrent study should be conducted to determine what changes to CSPI would be most applicable in the short term, what performance metrics would be generated with advanced solutions , and a phased approach between those two bookends. Changes to CSPI could include eliminating repetitive factors or adding in factors for side street delay and reliability. The original goal of maintaining a CSPI of 70 or higher would also be reevaluated for reasonableness.

Action Items:
♦ Conduct advanced performance monitoring pilot (ATSPM and crowd sourced data) ♦ Develop CSPI and Performance Program Phasing Plan
♦ Determine annual O&M budget and capital budget ranges for the program

CAPITAL PROJECT COMPONENTS
The program would allow capital projects to include retiming if needed. For example, if a major retiming effort is needed on a corridor due to construction that is needed sooner than the next major retiming for that zone or if the zone O&M contract is not able to address the need. If retiming is conducted outside of the zone process, the work would be coordinated closely with that effort.

In order to stretch program funding further and expand the scope of the capital components, the required local match could be subject to adjustment. The Ordinance requires a 20 percent minimum bu t does not prevent the establishment of a larger match for specific types of equipment. Matching ranges from 30 to 50 percent could be established for upgrades that are not likely to affect everyday traffic performance. This may discourage requests for f unding for certain types of equipment and focus more funds on needs that directly relate to traffic The program will continue to conduct an annual call for projects to fund the equipment and communications needs of the program.

43 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
performance. This concept of establishing higher matches for some portions of the program is provided here in the TSSMP for consideration in future years d epending on program performance.

Some higher- cost equipment may be best identified through the challenges of retiming with existing equipment, examples include implementation of adaptive signal systems that computerize the timing approach or deployment of ATMS systems that modernize activities toward maintenance of timing by providing notification of timing issues. Responsive/adaptive system configuration would be considered a capital expense and not mixed with retiming activities.

It should be noted that Ordinance 3 that governs Project P requires that priority be given to “programs and projects which include two or more jurisdictions”, so this criteria will continue to be a part of the selection of applications in this competitive call.

Action Items:
♦ Develop new Call for Projects including competitive evaluation criteria focused on capital component of the program

PHASING IN THE NEW APPROACH
Figure 19 shows how the program could be phased in by baselining the full county in the first two years and then operate cyclically for the later years . It is assumed that t he baseline retiming would be accomplished by undertaking a complete retiming in two consecutive annual phases, each addressing half of the county intersections in each year. The selection of the phases and zones would be based upon external factors that could include the overall operating condition of the zone, planned activity by Caltrans, or significant special events. Ongoing reconstruction of I- 405 in North County and I -5 i n South County are two significant events that would suggest postponing a zone to a subsequent year , because they disrupt traffic volumes due to bridge closures and detours to open routes.

Estimated annual costs are based on the following assumptions:
♦ Total of 3,000 signals in the County
♦ Approximately 25 percent of the signals are in each zone (approximately 750 signals) ♦ Average of $4,000 per signal to retime
♦ Average of $100 per signal per year for three years of maintenance of timing

44 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
♦ Estimated $8 million per year in available M2 funding for Project P

Figure 188 - Phasing and Estimated Annual Cost Distribution An appropriate role for expanded maintenance of timing support would be instituted for each zone upon completion of zone retiming. This would begin in Y ear 2 for the zones baselined in Year 1, and in Y ear 3 for the zone s evaluated in Year 2. In Year 3, there would be no need to undertake a zone retiming study. All retiming work completed in the prior two years should not require substantial change within the short time period that has elapsed, and the expanded level of support for maintenance can address any local adjustments that become necessary within this time period.

The cyclic retiming of one zone every four years would begin in Y ear 3. Retiming of each zone would rotate in future years , bas ed on the rotation established in Year 1. Program costs for retiming would also be stabilized from this year forward, as one quarter of the county would be under study for complete retiming, while the re mainder would be under the suggested maintenance of timing program.

The Measure M Ordinance for Project P required that projects be awarded on a competitive basis with the flexibility to define the competitive procedure that best meets the program. A measure of competitiveness can be introduced into the selection of zones for the early years of

45 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
implementation. For example, the Central and South zones likely have greater daily traffic levels per roadway between intersections than the Northwest and Southwest zones . In contrast, the Northwest and Southwest zones may be more appropriate for project readiness.

The method of establishing of the order of rotation would be done on a competitive basis by evaluating the order in which zones are timed and by prioritizing signals to be retimed within the zones. This evaluation could be accomplished by prioritizing intersections that would address corridor or zone deficiencies, concentrating work on the areas that offer the most promise for improvement. This is an area where the identification of less important intersections would help to focus resources on the mo st heavily used corrid ors and location of issues. The most recent CSPI scores would be helpful in identifying locations that may not require retiming because of low traffic levels for all routes of interest.

Even with the established rotation of zone retiming, project prioriti es can be reflected in the scoring system for award of equipment projects. Factors such as traffic volume, lack of capability of existing equipment, CSPI, multi-agency participation can continue as differentiators.

Beginning in Year 3, the cost for retiming will stabilize. Retiming of all intersections in a zone will require approximately ¼ of the annual funding available. The remainder can be used for program management and equipment upgrades. The ratio of equipment costs to timing costs has been running approximately ¾ equipment and ¼ timing. This ratio is expected to be maintained over time or for the timing portion to decrease slightly as performance is maintained through the O&M making retiming more efficient, thus freeing up some of the funds within the program for additional equipment budget or activities such as training that would benefit the program and participants.

LOCAL MATCH
The Measure M program requires a local match of at least 20 percent for the program either through cash or in-kind services. In some cases, this match has been a barrier to participation and may continue to be a barrier, which results in areas of the county performing more poorly than others in conflict with the original intent of a countywide program. A complete retiming of an intersection plus ongoing support for maintenance of timing can cost approximately $4,000 requiring a local match of $ 800 per intersecti on. An agency with 100 signals on the network would need to provide $80,000 (cash and/or in-kind services) to support a complete retiming in the baseline years of the zone-based approach. This level of participation could be a barrier to participation, leaving gaps in the zones, especially for agencies with limited budgets.

Maintaining coordinated operation places greater demand on traffic signal operations staff. They

46 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
need to monitor or drive the system regularly to observe problems and determine corre ctive action. This often results in making adjustments to timing to make phases slightly longer to cover traffic growth or variation, to move the green time for the arterial earlier or later to minimize stopping by approaching traffic, and to make substantial adjustments when construction projects disrupt the scheduled timing plans. Agencies can avoid these costs on occasion by not operating signals in coordinated mode. This is one of the reasons why in some cases, agencies may not be prepared to provide 20 percent of the cost of retiming and maintenance.

Undertaking zone baselining in the first two years would require participating agencies to contribute approximately $600,000 (cash and/or in-kind) for each zone. Also, the contributions would need to be scheduled within multiple city budgets to be available in the specific year of need. It is foreseen that an early call to conduct a complete retiming within one or two zones would show that there would not be 100 % participation, especially in the next few years of the program. The program could explore participation as providing match for OCTA to lead the timing or the cities doing it in- house (as their match) , to minimize the risk of having areas/corridors that are not in synchronization – this could be for both the initial timing and/or the O&M phase.

Some regional programs that were examined across the country have been structured around negligible matches for signal timing activities – for example, GDOT fully funds the RTOP and related traffic signal programs with no match. They have recognized that signal coordination can provide great benefits to the public but can increase costs to the local agency.

Even if OCTA or consultants are responsible for all project activities, city staff will need to participate in reviewing and approving recommended changes, fulfilling OCTA requirements for eligibility for all programs, and participating in consultant selection. Agencies who manage their own projects wil l typically meet the 20 percent contribution for timing activity through in-kind match, but agencies who have OCTA manage the project will likely not exceed 5 percent as in- kind resulting in higher cash match needs.

OCTA has traditionally looked for match ing activities that will bring funding into the program or provide clear reduction in costs to Measure M. For example, if an agency can furnish turning movement counts, these can reduce the cost of retiming. Cities with upgraded equipment may be able to provide counts automatically by obtaining the count data directly from the traffic signal management software. This data can also be substituted by information about whether the intersection signal phases are timing to their maximum value or are “gapping out” due to lower traffic volumes. This can determine whether left turn arrow phases need more or less ti me, and the information is available from most all modern traffic signal controllers.

47 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Shifting the cost of counts from manual counts collected on a s ingle day may provide greater benefits in the longer term. Traffic flows vary from day to day, so an analysis of traffic performance for a period longer than a single peak hour count may provide far more value and help to assure more robust signal timing.

Based on the types of projects that have been funded in the past under the program, it is likely that the 20 percent match for the overall program might also be met if the match for equipment was raised to a minimum of 25 to 30 percent, freeing additional funds to reduce the match for timing activities. Potentially increasing the match for less essential upgrades has already been discussed and this could be an additional reason to more closely evaluate how costs are matched.

This and other alternate approaches to achieving the match will be evaluated in future efforts.

Ultimately, there should be value recognized when a city allows its own high investment in traffic signals to be operated under a regional program. T he city h as invested in constructing and maintaining the traffic signals, and the costs of ong oing electrical power and replacement of damaged or antiquated equipment costs far more than 20 percent of the cost of retiming. There are many reasons to review options for more of the timing activity match requirement to be fulfilled by in -kind contributions as it is likely that the cash contribution will discourage participation in some cases.

Action Items:
♦ Evaluate opportunities for matching funds from related activities and potentially establishing different matches for different activities/expenses

TRAINING PROGRAM
Through the agency survey and traffic forum discussions, a good level of interest in staff training was relayed by the various agencies. Currently, staff resource constraints and limited training (especially for smaller agencies and those that experience high turnover) has been noted to deter their abilities to troubleshoot issues. Training for signal timing, signal coordination, communications, incident management, and equipment maintenance on a regular basis regionally could improve the effectiveness of the program.

A training program is desired that is open to all public agency staff and consultants in the region.

The program could include a certificate of completion once a minimum set of courses a re completed. Classes or lectures would be given by regional and national experts virtually, in a classroom or in a “laboratory” setting that allows users to experience hands -on training with actual signal controllers and software. Such a model existed in Los Angeles County until recently

48 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
through a comprehensive program offered by LA County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) in the areas of signal operation and maintenance to upgrade the skills of local traffic engineers and signal maintenance personnel. Metro used Call for Projects (sales tax return revenues) funding to invest in traffic system management training programs throughout the County. These training programs were well received and attended; however, they have since been discontinued due to a lack of grant funds and Metro now directs interested staff to signal synchronization courses offered by University of California (UC) Berkeley through the Technology Transfer Program.

The new program in Orange County would be accomplished through a combination of fre e and paid for classes organized by OCTA. There are currently a wide range of online courses covering the topics below , some of which are available at little to no cost to US local, state, regional, metropolitan, and federal government agencies. Classes may be held in conjunction with a local University or other suitable laboratory with facilities that will allow users to experience “hands - on” training with actual signal system components in a classroom environment.

The following is a select list of collaborators/providers of training:
♦ National Highway Institute Courses
(Development sponsored by FHWA) -- Primarily 2-day,
instructor-led courses
♦ Consortium for Innovative Transportation Education (CITE) partnered with Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) -- Primarily web-based, instructor-led courses ♦ Berkeley Tech Transfer Courses (Offered by UC Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies) -- Primarily web-based, instructor-led courses ♦ Traffic Signal Academy (Developed by the University of Tennessee's Center for Transportation Research) -- 1 to 5 days, instructor-led program ♦ Traffic Signal Training (Developed by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation) -- Self- paced program
♦ International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) Courses -- Multiple days, instructor-led program
The following are topics to be considered in the Or ange County program based on staff interest within the county:

49 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
♦ Traffic Signal Timing
♦ Fundamentals of traffic signal operations and timing
♦ Development of timing plans using the current state -of-the-practice systems and software techniques and programs consistent with program goals ♦ Advanced signal timing/fine-tuning
♦ Traffic Signal Design
♦ Fundamentals of traffic signal design with emphasis on operations and timing ♦ Detection systems: types, usage, design, maintenance, and operations ♦ Controller types and operational aspects and features ♦ Central system and operational aspects and features
♦ Traffic responsive and adaptive techniques in operations ♦ Control systems design and maintenance
♦ Performance Measures
♦ Measurements of arterial traffic performance
♦ Operations & Maintenance
♦ Techniques for operation of signal systems for system operators ♦ Advanced techniques for operation of signal systems for power users ♦ Communications
♦ Introductory communications system design and maintenance ♦ Advanced training courses in traffic signal control and communications ♦ Advanced Future Technologies
♦ Other systems and programs deemed necessary as technologies evolve ♦ National innovative programs

50 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
♦ Administrative
♦ OCTA Project P basics – application instruction, how to conduct and manage projects while underway, reporting, and reimbursement processes
♦ Legal and social impact on agencies – tort liability, public education Action Items:
♦ Develop training program plan
♦ Conduct training

PARTICIPATION AND COORDINATION AMONG AGENCIES
Inter-agency coordination is key in effectively implementing traffic signal synchronization along regional corridors that traverse multiple jurisdictions. Based on the feedback received from agencies through survey and discussions in workshops/traffic forum, participation and coordination amongst agencies was noted as one of the challenges of the program in the past decade due to several factors including:
♦ Agency participation – not all agencies in the County have applied for funding for a variety of reasons from lack of local match to resource constraints; the hope is that all agencies would benefit from this robust program.
♦ Staff Resources – A significant amount of effort and staff time has been noted as being put into the RTSSP projects, especially w hen three or four agencies are involved. This effort spans over five years from the time of project conceptualization to after the project is complete to settle the allocated funds. This challenge is exacerbated by limited staff resources especially for smaller agencies.
♦ Agency Signal Upgrade Plans – Caltrans maintains its own schedule to upgrade signals on state-controlled intersections. In the past decade, the planned schedule has not aligned with the schedules of TSS projects due to the uncertainty of what would be funded through the annual call.
♦ Cooperative Agreements - Caltrans developed a cooperative agreement template that provides local agenc ies to pay for Caltrans staff time. Some agencies choose not to include Caltrans in the project(s) to avoid paying Caltrans’ portion of the match and to avoid this fee.

51 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Action Items:
♦ Identify opportunities to support local agencies with resource limitations such as through identification of in -kind services that could eliminate or significantly reduce the cash match barrier to involvement
♦ OCTA to communicate the status, schedule and pe rformance of the program regularly with all agencies (including Caltrans District 12 ) to allow them to better align their schedule and annual budgets with that of the program and vice versa ♦ Continue to work with Caltrans to identify ways for Caltrans to engage with the program in the same way that other agencies do (at no cost to other agencies)

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
OCTA administers Project P through preparation of Request for Proposals (RFPs), funding and cooperative agreements, management of some projects (as desired by local agencies), hosting of Traffic Forum meetings, and other general program administration activities. This general administration will continue in the coming years. The resources include OCTA staff and consultant support. Consultant support is primarily used for technical review on OCTA- led projects and overall program support . Local jurisdictions that manage their own projects will continue to conduct and review all technical activities independent of OCTA.

When developing this updated plan, it became apparent that additional data to support regular assessment would be helpful in the future to conducting detailed analyses of the program. The data that has been collected historically has been effective for evaluating individual projects, but additional data would support programmatic evaluations to inform overall improvements.. OCTA will increase the administrative activities in order to comprehensively track scope, status, financials, and performance across the whole program regardless of which agencies manage the individual projects. This extended administrative review will allow OCTA to better evaluate and manage the program across all projects on an ongoing basis.

In order to effectively manage a program of this size, OCTA will benefit from a comprehensive, consistent slate of data that can be analyzed regularly or as needed. This will enable finetuning of program components as necessary to make the program the most effective and beneficial for local agencies. Currently, the administrative information varies widely from project to project, especially between projects administered by OCTA as compared to those administered by local agencies.

52 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Action Items:
♦ Develop or update standard template for project reports (delivered to OCTA upon project completion) that includes:
♦ Scope: activities performed by consultants, local agency (or agencies) and Caltrans ♦ Financials: total budget (including matching funds and in- kind contributions) and breakdown by categories including timing, equipment, signal timing maintenance, and performance tracking
♦ Performance: for retiming overall and reported over the maintenance period of the contract on a month-over-month basis (benefit-cost)
♦ Schedule adherence
♦ Narrative about risks, challenges, mitigation actions, and lessons learned ♦ Develop a standard template for quarterly reporting that includes:
♦ Status of scope, schedule, and budget
♦ Risk register and any activities currently ongoing to mitigate ♦ Period-to-date performance from the outset of the maintenance phase (as applicable) ♦ Incorporate template components into the application template to make it easier and more efficient for agencies to provide the contents during and after project completion ♦ Develop a master spreadsheet/database that tracks all projects ♦ Purchase and install a countywide asset management tool ♦ Develop a baseline inventory of equipment including model, software, cost, year installed ♦ Include inventory documentation in the project report templates ♦ Resource OCTA staff or consultants to maintain the inventory ♦ Update the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs Guidelines following the completion and adoption of this Master Plan

AGENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR FUNDING ELIGIBILITY

53 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
The Renewed Measure M is guided by an ordinance (a law pursuant to the California Public Utilities Code) that provides for the implementation of the Orange County Transportation Investment Plan and defines the specific requirements for eligibility of funds . In order to be eligible for funding, agencies must meet all requirements outlined in the ordinance (Ordinance 3) including participation in Traffic Forum meetings and adoption and maintenance of a Local Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan that “shall be consistent with the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan” (OCTA, Orange County Local Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3, July 24, 2006, page B -7 and B -8). This Plan is the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan referenced in the or dinance. As such, agencies will be required to adhere to the guidelines and requirements contained in this Plan in order to be eligible for any Renewed Measure M funding.

In order for an agency to be eligible for Measure M funding, they are required to mee t the requirements for all programs therein. The Project P eligibility requirements are defined by this Master Plan. OCTA has convened a countywide Traffic Forum that consists of all of the public sector agencies involved with traffic signal timing in the County. Two Traffic Forum meetings are hosted annually to provide a forum for agencies to share lessons learned, discuss topics pertinent to traffic signal synchronization, and learn about related projects such as studies or pilot projects involving supportive technologies.

Eligibility requirements:
♦ Attend at least one Traffic Forum meeting annually (agency staff are highly encouraged to attend rather than or in addition to consultant representatives of the agency to ensure that technical and policy information are adequately conveyed back to the agency and that the agency is represented in the event that decisions are required that may impact the agency)
♦ Maintain compliance with performance criteria
♦ Develop a local signal synchronization Plan or adopt O CTA’s regional plan (every three years)

54 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

SUMMARY OF ACTION ITEMS
Actions have been identified throughout the TSSMP to support the implementation of the policies and concepts her ein. Table 4 provides the summary of the action items with critical items shown in bold.

Table 4 - Summary of Action Items
Action Item
Opinion of
Cost
(in 1,000s)
FTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Traffic Signal Timing

1. Competitively evaluate the zones for phasing $150 - 250 0.5

2. Coordinate the schedule with agencies (including
Caltrans) to allow for annual budgeting
$25 – 50 0.1

3. Develop new Call for Projects for
supportive capital expenses
$25 – 50 0.1

4. Inventory county for preemption
equipment/systems
$150 - 250 0.5
Maintenance of Timing and Performance Monitoring

1. Conduct advanced performance monitoring pilot $150 - 250 0.25

2. Develop CSPI and performance program phasing
plan
$150 – 250

0.25 3. Determine annual O&M budget and capital
budget ranges for the program
$25 – 50 0.1

Capital Project Components

1. Develop new Call for Projects including
competitive evaluation criteria
$25 – 50 0.1

Local Match

1. Evaluate opportunities for matching funds from
related activities and potentially establishing
different matches for different
activities/expenses
$25 – 50 0.1

55 | NOVEMBER 8, 2021
Action Item
Opinion of
Cost
(in 1,000s)
FTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Training

1. Develop training program plan $25 – 50 0.25

2. Conduct training $50 per
year

0.1 Participation and Coordination Among Agencies

1. Identify opportunities to support local agencies
with resource limitations
$25 – 50 0.1

2. OCTA to communicate status, schedule, and
performance to agencies
0 0.1

3. Identify ways for Caltrans to engage with the
program in the same way that other agencies do
$25 - 50 0.1

Program Administration

1. Develop a standard template for project reports
$50 - 100 0.25

2. Develop a standard template for quarterly
reporting

3. Incorporate template components into the
application template

4. Develop a master spreadsheet/database that
tracks all projects

5. Purchase and install a countywide asset
management tool
$500 –
1,000

0.25 6. Develop a baseline inventory of equipment $400 – 500 0.25

7. Include inventory documentation in the project
report templates
n/a n/a

8. Resource OCTA staff or consultants to maintain
the inventory
$50 - 100
per year

0.25 9. Update the CTFP Guidelines following the
completion and adoption of this Master Plan
n/a 0.1

A | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

APPENDIX A – EXCERPT FROM MEASURE M ORDINANCE

214007.11
B-3
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

passages, is not included.

Q. “Project Final Report”: certification of completion of a project funded with Net Revenues, description of work performed, and accounting of Net Revenues expended and interest earned on Net Revenues allocated for the project.

R. “Regional Capacity Program”: capital improvement project s to increase roadway capacity and improve roadway operation as described in the Plan.

S. “Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program”: competitive capital and operations funding for the coordination of traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries as included in the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan and as described in the Plan.

T. “Revenues”: All gross revenues generated from the transactions and use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%) plus any interest or other earnings thereon.

U. “State Board of Equalization”: agency of the State of California responsible for the administration of sales and use taxes.

V. “Street and Road Project ”: the planning, design, construction, improvement, operation or maintenance necessary for, incidental to, or convenient for a street or road, or f or any transportation purpose, including, but not limited to, purposes authorized by Article XIX of the California Constitution.

W. “Traffic Forums”: a group of Eligible Jurisdictions working together to facilitate the planning of traffic signal synchronization among the respective jurisdictions.

X. “Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan”: an element of the MPAH to promote smooth traffic flow through synchronization of traffic signals along designated street routes in the County.

Y. “Transit”: the transportation of passengers by bus, rail, fixed guideway or other vehicle.

Z. “Transit Project ”: the planning, design, construction, improvement, equipment, operation or maintenance necessary for, or incidental to, or convenient for transit facilities or transit services.

AA. “Watershed Management Areas”: areas to be established by the

214007.11
B-13
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

eligible cost if the Eligible Jurisdiction does not use any Net Revenues as part of the funds for the local match.

2. Allocations shall be determined pursuant to a countywide competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by the Authority in establishing criteria for determining priority for allocations.

B. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program.

1. Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.

The Authority shall adopt and maintain a Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan, which shall be a part of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways.

The Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan shall include traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals within and across jurisdictional boundaries , and the means of implementing, operating and maintaining the programs and projects, including necessary governance and legal arrangements.

2. Allocations.
a. Allocations shall be determined pursuant to a countyw ide competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by the Authority in establishing criteria for determining priority for allocations. b. The Authority shall give priority to programs and projects which include two or more jurisdictions.
c. The Authority shall encourage the State to participate in the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and Authority shall give priority to use of transportation funds as match for the State’s discretionary funds used for implementing the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program.

3. An Eligible Jurisdiction shall contribute matching local funds equal to twenty percent (20%) of the project or program cost. The requirement for matching local funds may be satisfied all or in part with in-kind services provided by the Eligible Jurisdiction for the program or project, including salaries and benefits for employees of the Eligible Jurisdiction who perform work on the project or programs.

214007.11
B-14
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

4. An Eligible Jurisdiction sh all issue a report once every three years regarding the status and performance of its traffic signal synchronization activities.

5. Not less than once every three years an Eligible Jurisdiction shall review and revise , as may be necessary , the timing of traffic signals included as part of the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.

6. An Eligible Jurisdiction withdrawing from a signal
synchronization project shall be required to return Net Revenues allocated for the project.

C. Local Fair Share Program.

The allocation of eighteen percent ( 18%) of the Net Revenues for Local Fair Share Program projects shall be made to Eligible Jurisdiction s in amounts determined as follows:

1. Fifty percent (50%) divided between Eligible Jurisdictions based on the ratio of each Eligible Jurisdiction’s population for the immediately preceding calendar year to the total County population (including incorporated and unincorporated areas ) for the immediately preceding calendar year, both as determined by the State Department of Finance;

2. Twenty-five percent (25%) divided between Eligible Jurisdictions based on the ratio of each Eligible Jurisdiction’s existing Master Plan of Arterial Highways (“MPAH”) centerline miles to the total existing MPAH centerline miles within the County as determined annually by the Authority; and

3. Twenty-five percent (25%) divided between Eligible Jurisdictions based on the ratio of each Eligible Jurisdiction’s total taxable sales to the total taxable sales of the C ounty for the i mmediately preceding calendar year as determined by the State Board of Equalization.

VI. ALLOCATION OF NET REVENUES; TRANSIT PROGRAMS/PROJECTS.

A. Transit Extensions to Metrolink.

1. The Authority may provide technical assistance, transportation planning and engineering resources for an Eligible Jurisdiction to assist in designing Transit

B | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

APPENDIX B – EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NEEDS

ASSESSMENT AGENCY SURVEY

1 | Page

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE

AGENCY QUESTIONNAIRE

Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) has more than a decade of success in award and implementation of projects as part of its Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP). This program was based on the 2009 Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan for Orange County (Master Plan). We are currently updating the Master Plan to even further improve the positive impact to the County over the coming decade.

OCTA is currently seeking your agency’s input to inform new regional goals that support our vision for the future of signal synchronization in our County. Through this survey, we are seeking to understand what has worked well and what we should change as we move into the second decade of the program.

Please send your responses to this survey by Friday, July 24, 2020.

Attachments:
• Attachment A – Agency Communication Network Map - PDF • Attachment B – Agency Signalized Intersection Inventory - Spreadsheet • Attachment C – OCTA-Funded Signal Synchronization Projects Map (2008 – Present) - PDF

Name:

Title:

Agency:

Phone Number:

Email:

(Continued on next page)

2 | Page

EXISTING CONDITIONS

1. Attachment A (Agency Map - PDF) and Attachment B (Agency Inventory - Spreadsheet) attached to the e-mail transmittal shows the current inventory for your agency based on the existing communication network established in the 2019 ITS Strategic Deployment Plan and the Draft 2020 Local Signal Synchronization Plan.

Please mark up any changes and return the map and spreadsheet with your survey response. (Suffix file name with “_Changes_[MM-DD-YY]”)
Comments may include new signals, change s in the communication network, new work committed to construction , or new signal/ITS equipment not currently shown.

2. How many staff and/or percentage of staff are devoted to signal timing operations and maintenance (in full time staff equivalents or FTEs)?

3. How is the staff time in Question 2 split among the following? (For e.g. – ½ FTE is typically dedicated toward signal operations and maintenance (response to Question 2 above); of that time, 50% is spent on citizen complaints, 10% on signal timing, etc.) • Signal timing/retiming _____%
• Maintenance of signal synchronization _____%
• Performance monitoring and reporting _____%
• Equipment maintenance _____%
• Citizen complaints _____%
• Other _____%

4. Does your agency have a policy for signal timing?
(For e.g. – certain traffic signals must have a minimum 90 second cycle length; coordination can only operate during peak periods; basic timing parameters such as walk duration, yellow interval, red clearance, bike minimum)  Yes |  No

If yes, please summarize below and/or attach any written policies with your survey response.

(Continued on next page)

3 | Page

5. Does your agency update timing plans on a regular schedule?  Yes |  No
If yes, select one:
 Fewer than every 2 years  Every 2 years  Every 3-5 years  5 years or more

6. How do you develop new signal timing/synchronization? (Select all that apply)

 In-house  Consultants  OCTA

7. Please provide any comments about your agency’s overall approach to synchronization for the following components that should be considered in the updated RTSSP:
• Crossing arterials

• Hours/days/holidays

• Traffic responsive system

• Adaptive system

(Continued on next page)

4 | Page

8. How would you rate your own agency’s overall effort and results in signal synchronization and/or signal operations using a grade of A – F?

 A  B  C  D  E  F
Exceptional Needs a lot of work

How would you rate the county’s effort overall?

 A  B  C  D  E  F
Exceptional Needs a lot of work

9. Does your agency use Transit Signal Priority?
 Yes |  No
If yes, please mark the corridors/intersections on the map (Attachment A) provided. (Suffix file name with “_TSP_[MM-DD-YY]”)

10. Are there any current or planned Active Transportation Projects within your jurisdiction?  Yes |  No

If yes, please mark the components for the corridors/intersections on the map provided. (Suffix file name with “_ATP_[MM-DD-YY]”)

11. Can your agency staff manage systems (including Traffic Management Center) remotely?  Yes |  No
If no, do you expect this will change in the future?
 Yes |  No
Additional comments (if any)

12. Does your agency expect long-term changes in policies pertaining to remote access resulting from COVID-19?  Yes |  No

(Continued on next page)

5 | Page

PROGRAM PRIORITIES AND COMPONENTS

13. Attachment C (OCTA Map - PDF) attached to the e-mail transmittal shows the corridors that have been a part of the OCTA program for the past decade. Would you suggest any changes to the corridors or network?

14. Rate the importance of the following for your agency and for the County for the coming decade:
• Signal timing/retiming
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Maintenance of signal synchronization
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Traffic monitoring and data collection
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Purchase of new traffic signal field equipment
(For e.g.: controllers, signal heads, communications, detection) For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important

(Continued on next page)

6 | Page

• Purchase of other technology equipment
(For e.g.: CCTV cameras, changeable message signs)
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Central Systems
(For e.g.: ATMS, adaptive, performance monitoring, asset management) For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Equipment maintenance
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Performance monitoring and reporting
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Preparation for Connected-Autonomous Vehicles
For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important
• Other

For Agency:  1  2  3  4  5
For County:  1  2  3  4  5
Not Important Very Important

(Continued on next page)

7 | Page

Any additional information or comments?

15. What special needs, events, issues and/or constraints have impacted the implementation of traffic signal synchronization in your jurisdiction or might in the future?

16. Should traffic signal synchronization be expanded? More hours? More days? More corridors?

17. Does your agency’s existing signal system have major equipment or capital needs in order to implement additional coordination (based on Question 16) , such as controllers, interconnect, clocks, etc.? If yes, please indicate these deficiencies.

(Continued on next page)

8 | Page

18. Are there issues that prevent greater use of coordination such as funding resources, staff time, other?

19. Do you have any ideas or suggestions for an overall strategy for signal coordination for Orange County in the coming decade?

20. What are the challenges that your agency is currently experiencing related to the TSSP (if any)?

21. Any other thoughts or comments on the program?

(End of survey)

C | NOVEMBER 8, 2021

APPENDIX C – COUNTYWIDE INVENTORY

!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 51
50 49
48 47
46 45
44 43
42 41
40 39
38 37
36 35
34 33
32 31
30 29
28 27
26 25
24 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
10 Aliso Creek
Aliso Viejo
Alicia
Pacific Park
Glenwood
Wood Canyon
La Paz
Alicia
Pacific Park
Aliso Creek

LAGUNA BEACH
LAGUNA
WOODS
LAGUNA
HILLS
LAGUNA
NIGUEL
ALISO
VIEJO
73 OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Aliso Viejo
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Aliso Viejo 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 5625 Alicia Pkwy Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 120 130 120 120 2 Aliso Viejo Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 8108 Alicia Pkwy Hollyoak P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 120 130 120 120 3 Aliso Viejo Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 8120 Alicia Pkwy Morning Ridge P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 120 130 120 120 4 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8115 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 F 100 F F 5 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8125 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 110 110 6 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8101 Aliso Creek Rd Enterprise P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 7 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8102 Aliso Creek Rd Westwing P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 F 100 F F 8 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8103 Aliso Creek Rd Eastwing P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 F 100 F F 9 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8104 Aliso Creek Rd Columbia P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 F 100 F F 10 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8116 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 11 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8121 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo (N) P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 12 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8122 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen P (TS1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 F F 13 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8126 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo (S) P (TS1) Loops BBS F 120 120 F F 14 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8128 Aliso Creek Rd Loma Cante P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 100 100 F F 15 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8129 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 100 100 F F 16 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8133 Aliso Creek Rd Journey P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 100 100 F F 17 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8135 Aliso Creek Rd Glenhurst P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 100 100 F F 18 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8136 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 100 100 F F 19 Caltrans 2070 381 Aliso Creek Rd SR 73 On/Off Ramps 332 Loops BBS 20 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 5626 Aliso Niguel Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 F F 21 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 8124 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Pacific Park P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F 22 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8105 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Cedarbrook P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 23 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8110 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Enterprise P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 24 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8111 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Grand P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS F F F F F 25 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8119 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Columbia P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F 26 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8127 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Liberty P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 27 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8205 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Endeavor P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 28 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8206 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Parker P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 29 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8207 Aliso Viejo Pkwy Vantis P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 30 Caltrans 2070 53 Aliso Viejo Plaza La Paz 332 Loops BBS F F F F F 31 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8106 Canyon Vistas Pacific Park P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS F F F F F 32 Aliso Viejo Cobalt - ASC/3 Aries 8113 Cedarbrook Glenwood P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 33 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8107 Chase Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 34 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8132 Deerhurst Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 110 110 35 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 8112 El Toro Rd Bells Vireo P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 F 140 F F 36 Caltrans 2070 391 Enterprise Pacific Park 332 Loops No F F F F F 37 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8109 Glenwood Brookline P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F 38 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8114 Golf Glenwood P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 39 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 5627 Heather Ridge Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops No 120 120 120 F F 40 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8118 Journey Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 110 110 41 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 5628 La Paz Pacific Park P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 120 120 F F 42 Aliso Viejo Cobalt - ASC/3 Aries 8208 Liberty Freedom P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F 43 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 8117 Mareblu Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 F F 44 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8130 Nova Enterprise P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F 45 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8209 Parker Enterprise P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Aliso Viejo 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 46 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8210 Summit Enterprise P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 47 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8211 Town Center Enterprise P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 48 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8123 Wood Canyon Pacific Park P (TS1) Loops BBS F F F F F 49 Aliso Viejo ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8131 Wood Canyon Boundary Oak P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F 50 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8212 Wood Canyon Oakgrove P (TS2 Type 1) Loops No F F F F F 51 Aliso Viejo ASC/2S - ASC/2 Aries 8213 Wood Canyon University P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS F F F F F OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Aliso Viejo 8/24/2020

OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Aliso Viejo 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 113 Glenwood San Joaquin Hills On Ramp Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 380 Aliso Creek SR 73 Exit Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 394 El Toro SR 73 SB On Ramp Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle LengthAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street E/W Street !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
La Palma
Ball
Lincoln
Katella
Harbor
East
Euclid
Anaheim
Broadway
Sunkist
Santa Ana Canyon
Dale
Nohl Ranch
State College
Serrano
Magnolia
Miraloma
Brookhurst
Tustin
Knott
Lewis
Beach
Imperial
Walnut
Cerritos
Gilbert
Weir Canyon
Western
Fairmont
Rio Vista
Canyon Rim
Miller
Orange
9th
Riverdale
Frontera
Orangethorpe
Haster
Acacia
Gene Autry
Disney
Crowther
Meats
Anaheim Hills
Howell
Orangethorpe
Lewis
Ball
Orange
Anaheim

ANAHEIM
ORANGE

GARDEN GROVE

WESTMINSTER
SANTA
ANA
TUSTIN

FULLERTON YORBA
LINDA

CHINO HILLS
BUENA
PARK
LA
MIRADA
§¨¦
5 §¨¦
405
22 241
55 57 Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Anaheim
!
!
Agency Signal Included in LSSP
Agency/Caltrans Signal Not Included in LSSP
! Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP
N
0 1 20.5
Miles
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
9 8
3 2
99 98
97 96
95 94
93 92
91 89
85 82
81 80
79 78
77 76
75 74
73 72
71 70
69 68
67 6664 62
61 60
59 58
57 56
53 52
51 48
47 45
44 43
39 37
36 35
34 33
32 31
30 29
28 27
25 21
309
307
305
304
303
302301
300
299
298
297
296
289 288
287
276
275
209
206
197
196
195
190
189
188186
178
175
173
172
170
169
168
167
166
165
164
163
162
161160
159
158
157
156
155
154
152
146
145
135
134
133
132
131
124
119
118
117
116
115
114
113
112
111
110
109
108
107
106
105
104
103
102
101 Lincoln
Ball
Euclid
Harbor
La Palma
Katella
Dale Magnolia
Brookhurst
Broadway
Knott
Beach
Walnut
Cerritos
Gilbert
Western
Crescent
Orange
9th
Disneyland
Anaheim
West
Orangewood
Romneya
Anaheim Shores
Ball
Gilbert
Cerritos
Orange
Broadway
Anaheim

ANAHEIM

BUENA PARK

STANTON

GARDEN GROVE

FULLERTON
91 §¨¦
5 OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Anaheim
Fiber
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Parks
Waterways
Rail
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!! !
!
!
9 7
6 5
4 3
1 90
88 87
63 54
50 49
48 46
40 38
26 24
23 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
306
286
284
283
282
281
280
279
278
277
274
273
271
270
269
268
267
266
265
264
263
262
261
260
259
258
257
256
255
254
253
252
251
250
249
248
247
246
244
243
242
241
240
239
238
236
228
227
222
218
217
216
215
214
213
212
211
210
208
207
205
204
203
202
201
200
199
198
192
191
187
183
182
181
180
179
177
176
174
171
153
151
150
149
148
147
146
144
142
140
139
138
137
136
130
129
127
126 125
121
120
118
117
116
115
114
113
112
109
100
La Palma
Ball
East
Anaheim
Lincoln
Sunkist
Katella
State College
Miraloma
Harbor
Tustin
Lewis
Cerritos
Rio Vista
South
Broadway
Miller
Orangewood
Nohl Ranch
Kraemer
Riverdale
Wagner
Lakeview
Haster
Manchester
Santa Ana Canyon
Acacia
Gene Autry
Clementine
Disney
Orangethorpe
Blue Gum
Meats
Kellogg
Howell
Jefferson
Convention
Douglass
Placentia
Taft
Glassell
Richfield
Manchester
Lewis
Orangethorpe
Orangethorpe
ORANGE

FULLERTON PLACENTIA

ANAHEIM
55 91
91 §¨¦
5 Fiber
Existing Communications Network
Parks
Waterways
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Anaheim
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
86 84
83 65
55 42
41 22
308
295
294
293
292
291
290
285
272
245
237
235
234
233
232
231
230
229
226
224
223
222 221
220
219218
194 193
185
184
143
141
129
128
127
123
La Palma
Serrano
Santa Ana Canyon
Nohl Ranch
Imperial
Weir Canyon
Fairmont
Canyon Rim
Kellogg
Orangethorpe
Anaheim Hills
Royal Oak
Oak Canyon
Gypsum Canyon
La Palma
Weir Canyon
Imperial
Kellogg

VILLA PARK
ORANGE

YORBA LINDA

ANAHEIM
241
91 Fiber
Existing Communications Network
Parks
Waterways
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Anaheim
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 705 Acacia La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 120 120 120 2 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 633 Agate St Broadway Econolite Type P None 3 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 620 Anaheim Blvd Sycamore St Econolite Type P Econolite None 60 60 120 4 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 624 Anaheim Blvd Center St Econolite Type P Econolite None 5 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 631 Anaheim Blvd Santa Ana St Econolite Type P Econolite None 60 120 6 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 637 Anaheim Blvd South St Econolite Type P Econolite None 120 100 120 7 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 640 Anaheim Blvd Vermont Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 8 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 703 Anaheim Blvd La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 9 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 711 Anaheim Blvd North St Econolite Type P None 60 100 60 10 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 723 Anaheim Blvd Cerritos Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 11 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 736 Anaheim Blvd Lincoln Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 120 120 120 120 120 12 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 744 Anaheim Blvd Broadway Econolite Type P Econolite None 120 100 120 13 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 786 Anaheim Blvd Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 14 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 828 Anaheim Blvd Palais Rd Syncronex Type P None 120 120 120 15 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 855 Anaheim Blvd Orangewood Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 16 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 864 Anaheim Blvd Center St Promenade Econolite Type P None 17 Caltrans 2070 On-Street Master 397 Anaheim Blvd Katella Av Econolite Type P None 120 130 120 120 18 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 657 Arena Corp Center Douglass Rd Syncronex Type P Iteris None 19 Anaheim 2070 9114 Artic Drway Douglass Rd None
20 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 706 Baxter St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 120 120 120 21 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 627 Belinda Circle Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 22 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 824 Big Sky Ln Imperial Hwy Syncronex Type P None 23 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 694 Blue Gum St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Iteris None 24 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 857 Blue Gum St Miraloma Av Syncronex Type P None 25 Anaheim 2070 9115 Broadway Maxwell Park None
26 Anaheim 9116 Broadway Fire Signal 1 None
27 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 610 Brookhurst St Falmouth Av Econolite Type P None 140 100 110 100 100 28 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 623 Brookhurst St Catalina Av Econolite Type P None 70 65 70 65 65 29 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 695 Brookhurst St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 140 130 140 130 130 30 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 718 Brookhurst St Crescent Av Econolite Type P None 140 130 140 130 130 31 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 745 Brookhurst St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 130 130 130 130 130 32 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 772 Brookhurst St Orange Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 33 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 781 Brookhurst St Ball Rd Econolite Type P Econolite None 130 130 130 130 130 34 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 801 Brookhurst St Katella Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 130 130 130 130 130 35 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 826 Brookhurst St Sequoia Av Econolite Type P None 140 130 140 130 130 36 Anaheim 2070 1272 Brookhurst St Brookmore Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 37 Caltrans 170/170E On-Street Master 12 Brookhurst St I-5 SB Ramp None 38 Anaheim 2070 9117 Bus Entrance Douglass Rd None
39 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 885 Cast Place/ Ox Rd Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 170 170 170 40 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 830 Chantilly St La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 41 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 896 Chrisden St La Palma Av Syncronex Type P Iteris None 80 160 42 Anaheim 2070 1257 Cinema City La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 160 80 43 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 743 Citron St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 44 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 758 Citron St Broadway Econolite Type P None 60 60 60 45 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 858 Citron St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 46 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 727 Clementine St Disney Wy Syncronex Type P Iteris None Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 47 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 739 Clementine St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 60 60 60 48 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 753 Clementine St Broadway Econolite Type P None 60 60 49 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 809 Clementine St Katella Av Syncronex Type P Iteris None 130 130 130 120 120 50 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 834 Clementine St Fire Signal 3 Syncronex Type P None 51 Caltrans 2070 - SEPAC On-Street Master 370 Columbine St La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 52 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 603 Commercial St Anaheim Blvd Econolite Type P None 53 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 651 Convention Center Katella Av Econolite Type P None 54 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 684 Coronado St Kraemer Blvd McCain Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 55 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 895 Corporate Canyon (Wescom) La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 160 80 56 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 750 Dale Av Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 57 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 767 Dale Av Broadway CSC T1000 None 58 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 773 Dale Av Orange Av CSC T1000 None 59 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 785 Dale Av Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 60 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 649 Disneyland Dr Paradise Wy Econolite Type P None 61 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 650 Disneyland Dr Downtown Disney (Simba) Econolite Type P None 62 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 835 Disneyland Dr Ball Rd Econolite 333L None 170 170 170 63 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 738 East St Broadway Syncronex Type P None 80 80 64 Anaheim 2070 9118 Edison Bike Trl Ball Rd None
65 Anaheim 2070 1309 Emogene St La Palma Av McCain Type P Iteris None 66 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 647 Empire St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 67 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 605 Euclid St Medical Center Dr Econolite Type P None 68 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 616 Euclid St Glenoaks Av Econolite Type P None 69 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 642 Euclid St Crone Av Econolite Type P None 70 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 688 Euclid St Romneya Dr Econolite Type P None 71 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 700 Euclid St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 72 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 720 Euclid St Crescent Av Econolite Type P None 73 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 748 Euclid St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 74 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 765 Euclid St Broadway Econolite Type P None 75 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 769 Euclid St Orange Av Econolite Type P None 76 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 779 Euclid St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 77 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 798 Euclid St Cerritos Av Econolite Type P None 78 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 805 Euclid St Katella Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 79 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 860 Euclid St Anaheim Plaza Econolite Type P None 80 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 863 Euclid St Palais Rd Econolite Type P None 81 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 9119 Euclid St Shopping Center (Target) None 82 Anaheim 9120 Euclid St Fire Signal 6 None
83 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 666 Fairmont Blvd Santa Ana Canyon Rd Econolite Type P None 120 80 120 84 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 676 Fairmont Blvd La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 85 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 696 Fairview St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 86 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 838 Festival Center Santa Ana Canyon Econolite Type P None 87 Anaheim 2070 9121 Finch St Riverdale Av None
88 Anaheim 2070 - ASC/3 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 792 Firestation #7 Ball Rd Syncronex Type P None 89 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 884 Flore St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 170 170 170 90 Anaheim 2070 9122 Gardenwalk Disney Wy None
91 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 883 Gaymont St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 92 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 699 Gilbert St La Palma Av Econolite Type P None OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 93 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 719 Gilbert St Crescent Av McCain Type P None 94 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 747 Gilbert St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 95 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 764 Gilbert St Broadway CSC T1000 None 96 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 771 Gilbert St Orange Av Econolite Type P None 97 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 796 Gilbert St Cerritos Av Econolite Type P None 98 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 851 Gilbert St Savanna HS (Ped Xing) CSC T1000 None 99 Anaheim 2070 - ASC/3 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 853 Gilbuck (Ped Xing) Ball Rd Syncronex Type P None 100 Caltrans Other On-Street Master 423 Glassell St Fronterra St Syncronex Type P None 101 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 630 Grand Av Lincoln Av Syncronex Type P None 102 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 606 Harbor Blvd Romneya Dr Syncronex Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 103 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 617 Harbor Blvd North St Econolite Type P None 120 60 120 60 60 104 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 621 Harbor Blvd Sycamore St Econolite Type P None 120 60 120 60 60 105 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 632 Harbor Blvd Santa Ana St Syncronex Type P Iteris None 120 60 120 60 60 106 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 636 Harbor Blvd Water St McCain Type P None 120 60 120 60 60 107 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 639 Harbor Blvd South St Syncronex Type P None 120 60 120 60 60 108 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 701 Harbor Blvd La Palma Av Syncronex Type P Econolite None 109 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 726 Harbor Blvd Disney Wy Syncronex Type P Iteris None 130 130 130 130 130 110 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 741 Harbor Blvd Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 111 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 757 Harbor Blvd Broadway Syncronex Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 112 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 778 Harbor Blvd Vermont Av Syncronex Type P Iteris None 120 120 120 120 120 113 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 783 Harbor Blvd Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 170 170 170 114 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 794 Harbor Blvd Manchester Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 115 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 807 Harbor Blvd Katella Av Syncronex 333L Iteris None 116 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 814 Harbor Blvd Convention Wy Econolite Type P None 117 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 818 Harbor Blvd Orangewood Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 118 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 833 Harbor Blvd East Shuttle Area Syncronex Type P Iteris None 119 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 847 Harbor Blvd La Verne St (Ped Xing) Econolite Type P None 60 60 120 60 60 120 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 848 Harbor Blvd Wilken Wy Econolite Type P None 121 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 819 Haster St Orangewood Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 122 Anaheim 170/170E 9123 I-5 NB Ramp Anaheim Wy None
123 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 653 Imperial Hwy Avenida Bernardo Econolite Type P None 124 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 803 Katella Av Disneyland Dr Syncronex Type P Iteris None 125 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 799 Katella Av Douglass Rd McCain Type P Iteris None 126 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 800 Katella Av Howell Av Syncronex Type P Iteris None 120 120 120 127 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 664 Kellogg Dr La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 128 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 889 Kellogg Dr Glenview Av CSC T1000 None 129 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 880 Kellogg Dr NB Orangethorpe Ave McCain Type P None 130 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 841 Kingsley St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 131 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 643 Knott Av Savanna St Econolite Type P None 60 110 120 110 110 132 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 774 Knott Av Orange Av Econolite Type P None 110 120 110 110 110 133 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 788 Knott Av Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 110 120 120 120 134 Anaheim Other - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 843 Knott Av Ped Xing (Hansen) Econolite Type P None 135 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 9124 Knott Av Danbrook None
136 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 654 Kraemer Blvd Fire Signal 5 Syncronex Type P None 137 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 680 Kraemer Blvd La Jolla St McCain Type P None 138 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 844 Kraemer Blvd Miraloma Av McCain Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 139 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 878 Kraemer Blvd La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 120 140 140 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 704 La Palma Av East St Syncronex Type P Econolite None 141 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 839 La Palma Av Jenifer Dr McCain Type P Iteris None 142 Anaheim 2070 1252 La Palma Av Cosby Wy McCain Type P Iteris None 143 Caltrans 170/170E On-Street Master 366 La Palma Av Imperial Hwy (SR-90) Econolite Model 332 None 144 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 663 Lakeview Av La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 120 140 145 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 702 Lemon St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 146 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 737 Lemon St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 147 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 886 Lemon St Ball Rd Syncronex Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 148 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 724 Lewis St Cerritos Av Econolite Type P None 149 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 789 Lewis St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 150 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 811 Lewis St Katella Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 151 Anaheim 2070 874 Lewis St Orangewood Av Syncronex Type P Iteris None 130 130 130 130 130 152 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 629 Lincoln Av Crescent Av Econolite Type P None 153 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 731 Lincoln Av East St Syncronex Type P None 154 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 634 Loara St Broadway Econolite Type P None 155 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 644 Loara St Ball Rd Syncronex Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 156 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 881 Loara St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 157 Anaheim 2070 979 Loara St Crescent Av Econolite Type P None 158 Anaheim 2070 9125 Loara St North St None
159 Anaheim Other 9126 Loara St Westmont Dr None
160 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 827 Magic Wy Disneyland Dr Econolite Type P Econolite None 161 Anaheim 2070 9127 Magic Wy Downtown Dr None
162 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 609 Magnolia Av Woodland Dr Econolite Type P None 163 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 619 Magnolia Av Ped Xing (Greenleaf) Econolite Type P None 164 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 697 Magnolia Av La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 165 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 728 Magnolia Av Crescent Av Econolite Type P None 166 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 749 Magnolia Av Lincoln Av Syncronex Type P None 167 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 766 Magnolia Av Broadway Econolite Type P None 168 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 770 Magnolia Av Orange Av Econolite Type P None 169 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 784 Magnolia Av Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 170 Anaheim 2070 - ASC/3 9298 Magnolia Av Winston Econolite Type P None 171 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 601 Manassero St La Palma Av Syncronex Type P None 172 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 761 Manchester Av Broadway Econolite Type P None 173 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 768 Manchester Av Santa Ana St Econolite Type P None 174 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 854 Manchester Av Orangewood Av Syncronex Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 175 Caltrans 170/170E On-Street Master 399 Manchester Av Lincoln Av Econolite Model 332 None 176 Anaheim 2070 9128 Mardi Gras (Ped) Rio Vista St None 177 Anaheim 2070 1296 Market St Katella Av Econolite Type P Iteris None 60 120 60 178 Anaheim 2070 9129 Maxwell Park Orange Av None
179 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 686 McKinnon Lakeview Av Syncronex Type P None 90 90 90 180 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 682 Miller St Miraloma Av CSC T1000 None 181 Anaheim M50 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 685 Miller St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 182 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 840 Miller St Ped Xing (Ocean Circle) Syncronex Type P None 183 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 707 Miraloma La Palma Av Syncronex Type P None 184 Anaheim Other 9130 Monte Vista Festival Dr None
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 185 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 892 Monte Vista Rd Weir Canyon Rd Econolite Type P Iteris None 186 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 626 Monterey St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 187 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 820 Mountain View Orangewood Av Econolite Type P None 65 65 65 65 65 188 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 628 Muller St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 189 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 806 Ninth St Katella Av Syncronex Type P Iteris None 190 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 816 Ninth St Orangewood Av CSC T1000 None 191 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 716 Nohl Ranch Rd Meats Av Econolite Type P None 192 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 733 Nohl Ranch Rd Nohl Canyon Rd Econolite Type P None 193 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 823 Nohl Ranch Rd Canyon Rim Syncronex Type P None 194 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 876 Nohl Ranch Rd Imperial Hwy Syncronex Type P Iteris None 195 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 646 Nutwood St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 196 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 797 Nutwood St Cerritos Av CSC T1000 None 197 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 802 Nutwood St Katella Av McCain Type P Iteris None 120 60 120 60 60 198 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 604 Ocean Circle La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 199 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 614 Olive St La Palma Av Econolite Type P Econolite None 60 60 60 200 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 732 Olive St Lincoln Av Syncronex Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 201 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 742 Olive St Broadway Econolite Model 332 None 202 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 661 Orange Center Dr Orangewood Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 203 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 7598 Orangethorpe Av Lakeview Av None 204 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 602 Pacificenter Dr La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 205 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 831 Ped Xing (Claudina) Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 206 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 837 Ped Xing (DeVoy) Dale Av Econolite Type G None 207 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 832 Ped Xing (La Plaza) Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 208 Anaheim 2070 9131 Ped Xing (Nordica) Wagner Av None 209 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 845 Ped Xing (Orangeview Jr. HS) Orange Av Econolite Type P None 210 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 882 Peregrine St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 211 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 648 Phoenix Club Dr Ball Rd McCain Type P None 212 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 822 Rampart St Orangewood Av Syncronex Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 213 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 611 Red Gum St La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 214 Anaheim 2070 or CSC T1 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 668 Red Gum St Miraloma Av Syncronex Type P None 215 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 662 Richfield Rd La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 216 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 735 Rio Vista St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 217 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 607 Romneya Dr East St Syncronex Type P None 218 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 712 Royal Oak Rd Nohl Ranch Rd Econolite Type P None 219 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 615 Rural Ridge Dr Nohl Ranch Rd Econolite Type P None 220 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 675 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Roosevelt McCain Type P None 221 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 691 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Avenida Margarita Econolite Type P None 120 120 222 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 692 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Pinney Dr Econolite Type P None 223 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 891 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Festival Dr Econolite Type P None 224 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 894 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Mohler Dr Econolite Type P None 120 120 225 Anaheim 170/170E 9132 Santa Ana Canyon Rd SR-91 EB Ramp None 226 Caltrans 2070 On-Street Master 172 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Imperial Hwy Syncronex Type P None 120 120 227 Caltrans 2070 On-Street Master 173 Santa Ana Canyon Rd Lakeview Av Econolite Type P None 135 135 135 228 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 625 Santa Ana St East St CSC T1000 None 229 Anaheim 2070 9133 Savi Ranch Parkway Pullman St None 230 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 714 Scout Trl Nohl Ranch Rd CSC T1000 None OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 231 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 683 Serrano Av Oak Canyon Dr Syncronex Type P None 232 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 710 Serrano Av Highcrest Dr Syncronex Type P None 233 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 715 Serrano Av Canyon Rim Syncronex Type P None 234 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 760 Serrano Av Nohl Ranch Rd Syncronex Type P None 235 Anaheim Other - ASC/3 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 893 Serrano/Wildflower Canyon Creek Syncronex Type P None 236 Anaheim 2070 9134 Shopping Center (e/o Olana) Lincoln Av None 120 120 120 120 120 237 Anaheim 2070 871 Solomon Dr Santa Ana Canyon Syncronex Type P None 120 80 120 238 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 755 South St Sunkist St CSC T1000 None 239 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 762 South St East St CSC T1000 None 240 Caltrans 2070 ANAHEIM 20 SR-57 NB Ramp Katella Av Econolite Model 332 None 60 60 120 241 Caltrans 2070 ANAHEIM 21 SR-57 NB Ramp Orangewood Av Econolite Model 332 None 65 65 65 242 Caltrans 2070 ANAHEIM 19 SR-57 SB Ramp Katella Av Econolite Model 332 None 60 60 60 243 Caltrans 2070 ANAHEIM 187 SR-57 SB Ramp Orangewood Av Econolite Model 332 None 130 65 130 65 65 244 Caltrans 170/170E On-Street Master 117 SR-91 WB Ramp Lakeview Av Econolite Model 332 None 245 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 717 Stage Coach Rd Nohl Ranch Rd McCain Type P None 246 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 622 State College Blvd Santa Ana St Econolite Type P None 247 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 635 State College Blvd Vermont Av Econolite Type P None 248 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 658 State College Blvd Winston Rd Syncronex Type P None 249 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 667 State College Blvd Via Burton St Econolite Type P None 250 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 690 State College Blvd Placentia/ Romneya Dr Econolite Type P None 251 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 725 State College Blvd Cerritos Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 252 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 729 State College Blvd Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 253 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 754 State College Blvd South St (EB) None 254 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 776 State College Blvd Wagner Av Econolite Type P None 255 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 791 State College Blvd Ball Rd Syncronex Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 256 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 812 State College Blvd Katella Av Econolite Type P None 257 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 815 State College Blvd Gene Autry Wy Syncronex Type P None 258 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 829 State College Blvd Howell Av Econolite Type P None 130 130 130 130 130 259 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 849 State College Blvd La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 260 Anaheim 2070 869 State College Blvd Shopping Center (Granada Sq) Econolite Type P None 261 Anaheim 2070 872 State College Blvd Underhill Econolite Type P None 262 Anaheim 2070 1332 State College Blvd Artisan Center Econolite Type P None 263 Anaheim 2070 1335 State College Blvd South St (WB) Econolite Type P None 264 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 659 Sunkist St Winston Rd Econolite Type P None 265 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 721 Sunkist St Cerritos Av Syncronex Type P None 266 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 730 Sunkist St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 267 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 777 Sunkist St Wagner Av CSC T1000 None 268 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 793 Sunkist St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 269 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 859 Sunkist St Ped Xing (Sycamore) Econolite Type G None 270 Anaheim 2070 9135 Sunkist St Ped Xing (Tryon) None
271 Anaheim 2070 9136 Sunkist St Ped Xing (Jamison) None 272 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 693 Sunset Ridge Rd Savona Wy Syncronex Type P None 273 Anaheim 2070 9137 Sunshine Wy Miraloma Av None
274 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 618 Sycamore St East St CSC T1000 None 275 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 1294 Tiara St Katella Av Econolite Type P None 276 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 645 Trident St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 120 120 120 120 OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 277 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 679 Tustin Av Miraloma Av Syncronex Type P None 278 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 709 Tustin Av Riverdale Av McCain Type P None 279 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 825 Tustin Av Pacificenter Dr Econolite Type P None 280 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 888 Tustin Av La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 281 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 665 Van Buren St La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 282 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 638 Vermont Av East St CSC T1000 None 283 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 9138 Vermont Av Olive St None
284 Anaheim 2070 9139 Vermont St Ped Xing (Dakota) None 285 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 687 Via Cortez Santa Ana Canyon Econolite Type P None 120 80 120 286 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 734 Villa Real Dr Nohl Ranch Rd Econolite Type P None 287 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 722 Walnut St Cerritos Av Syncronex Type P None 288 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 780 Walnut St Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 85 120 100 100 289 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 852 Webster (Ped Xing) Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 130 65 130 130 130 290 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 669 Weir Canyon Rd Oak Canyon Dr Syncronex Type P None 291 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 670 Weir Canyon Rd La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 130 140 292 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 674 Weir Canyon Rd Santa Ana Canyon Econolite Type P None 130 293 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 681 Weir Canyon Rd Serrano Syncronex Type P None 294 Anaheim 2070 866 Weir Canyon Rd Running Springs Econolite Type P None 295 Yorba Linda 2070 6844 Weir Canyon Rd Savi Ranch Parkway Econolite Type P None 130 140 296 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 846 West Anaheim Medical Center Orange Av Econolite Type P None 297 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 612 West St La Palma Av Syncronex Type P None 298 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 652 West St Transit Plaza Econolite Type P None 299 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 746 West St Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 300 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 759 West St Broadway Econolite Type P None 60 60 60 301 Anaheim 2070 - SEPAC 9140 Westchester Lincoln Av None 302 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 751 Western Av Lincoln Av Econolite Type P None 303 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 775 Western Av Orange Av Econolite Type P None 304 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 787 Western Av Ball Rd Econolite Type P None 120 110 120 110 110 305 Anaheim 2070 9141 Western Av Faircrest Dr None
306 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 655 White Star Av La Palma Av Econolite Type P None 307 Caltrans 170/170E On-Street Master 179 Wilshire Av I-5/Lincoln Econolite Model 332 None 308 Anaheim Other Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 671 Woodcreek Santa Ana Canyon CSC T1000 None 309 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 698 Woodland Dr La Palma Av Econolite Type P None OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Anaheim 656 Anaheim Water
Anaheim 810 Anaheim Katella
Anaheim 868 Anaheim Town Square State College
Anaheim 740 Broadway Kroeger
Anaheim 1349 Brookhurst Huntington
Anaheim 867 Burton Placentia
Anaheim 790 East Ball
Anaheim 836 Embassy Suites Harbor
Anaheim 870 Fire Station Nohl Ranch
Anaheim 1276 Imperial Imperial Hwy Connector
Anaheim 1277 Imperial Hwy Connector Esperanza
Anaheim 808 Katella Stadium Crossings
Anaheim 1293 Katella Dino
Anaheim 677 Kellogg Orangethorpe
Anaheim 842 Knott Pedestrian Crosswalk
Anaheim 613 La Palma Village
Anaheim 856 Lakeview Pedestrian Crosswalk
Anaheim 1278 Magnolia Northgate
Anaheim 713 Nohl Ranch Anaheim Hills
Anaheim 862 Orangethorpe Cypress
Anaheim 875 Santa Ana Canyon Anaheim Hills
Anaheim 890 Santa Ana Canyon Riverview
Anaheim 813 State College Gateway
Anaheim 1340 State College N of Wright
Anaheim 660 Wagner Nordica
Anaheim 804 Walnut Katella
Anaheim 887 Walnut Magic
Buena Park 6246 Dale Crescent
Caltrans 171 Anaheim Ca-91 E Frontage
Caltrans 354 Anaheim I5 N On-Ramp
Caltrans 182 Ball Beach
Caltrans 471 Beach Cherokee
Caltrans 474 Beach Anacapa
Caltrans 8 Brookhurst Ca-91 E Exit 26
Caltrans 433 Ca-57 N Exit 3 Ball
Caltrans 17 Ca-57 S Exit 3 Ball
Caltrans 13 Ca-57 S Exit 4 Lincoln
Caltrans 14 Ca-57 S Exit 4 Lincoln
Caltrans 449 Ca-91 E Exit 35 Tustin
Caltrans 387 Ca-91 E Frontage Ca-91 E Exit 28
Caltrans 10 Ca-91 W Exit 32 Kraemer
Caltrans 448 Ca-91 W Exit 35 Ca-91 W Ramp 35
Caltrans 355 Disney I-5 S Exit 109B
Caltrans 108 Disneyland I-5 S Exit 110B
Caltrans 9 East Ca-91 E Ramp 29
Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle LengthE/W StreetAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Anaheim 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUNCabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle LengthE/W StreetAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street Caltrans 166 Esperanza Imperial Nb Ramp
Caltrans 7 Euclid Ca-91 E Exit 27
Caltrans 109 Euclid I-5 N Ramp 112
Caltrans 165 Gypsum Canyon Sr-91 W Exit 41A
Caltrans 107 I-5 N Exit 110 Harbor
Caltrans 371 I-5 S Exit 110A Harbor
Caltrans 432 I-5 S Exit 111 I-5 S Ramp 111
Caltrans 114 Imperial Ca-91 E Exit 36
Caltrans 361 Imperial Ca-91 W Exit 36
Caltrans 180 Lincoln Beach
Caltrans 184 Manchester Katella
Caltrans 353 Manchester Anaheim
Caltrans 181 Orange Beach
Caltrans 169 Raymond Ca-91 W Ramp 29
Caltrans 11 Santa Ana Canyon Ca-91 E Exit 35
Caltrans 6 State College Ca-91 E Exit 30A
Caltrans 146 State College Ca-91 W Ramp 30
Caltrans 106 The City Orange Center
Caltrans 468 Weir Canyon Sr-91 E Exit 39
County of Orange 6412 Gilbert Chanticleer
Cypress 7398 Cerritos W of Ritter
Garden Grove 4436 Debbie Chapman
Garden Grove 4190 Orangewood West
Orange 3160 Serrano Kendra
Orange 3152 Via Escola Cannon
Yorba Linda 6750 Kellogg Richard M Nixon Pkwy Onramp
!
!
!
!
!! !! !!! ! !! !
!
! !! !! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! ! !!
!
!! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
Birch
ImperialBrea
Lambert
BerryPuente
Central
Carbon Canyon
Rose
Valencia
State College
Kraemer
Associated
Palm
Whittier
Tonner Canyon
Brea
Valencia
Associated
BREA

UNINCORPORATED

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CHINO
HILLS

FULLERTON
YORBA

LINDAPLACENTIA

DIAMOND
BAR
57 Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Brea
Twisted Pair
!
!
Agency Signal Included in LSSP
Agency/Caltrans Signal Not Included in LSSP
! Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
!
!
!
!
!! !! !!! ! !! !
!
! !! !! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! ! !!
!
!! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 73
72 71
70 69
68 67
66 65
64 63
62 61
60 59
58 57
56 55
54 53
52 51
50 49
48 47
46 45 44 43
42 41
4039
38 37
36 35
34 33
32 31
30 29
28 27
26 25
24 23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
BirchImperial
Brea
Lambert
BerryPuente
Central
Rose
Valencia
State College
Kraemer
Associated
Whittier
Carbon Canyon
Tonner Canyon
Associated
Brea
Valencia
Imperial
Mercury
BREA

FULLERTON

PLACENTIA

UNINCORPORATED

ORANGE COUNTY
57 OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Brea
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Rail
Fiber
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Brea 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 87 Arovista Av Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 2 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 400 Asociated Rd Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 3 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7223 Associated East Birch P (TS2 Type 1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 4 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7211 Associated Rd Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 F F 5 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7224 Associated West Birch St P (TS2 Type 2) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 6 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7208 Berry St Central Av P (TS1) Loops 110 100 110 100 100 7 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7217 Berry St Lambert Rd P (TS1) Loops 110 100 110 F F 8 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 148 Berry St Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 9 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7204 Brea Blvd Central Av P (TS1) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 10 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7215 Brea Blvd Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 11 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7221 Brea Blvd Birch St P (TS1) Video Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 12 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7230 Brea Blvd Elm St P (TS2 Type 1) Video 120 120 120 120 120 13 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7242 Brea Blvd Cypress St P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 14 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 VMS 7247 Brea Blvd Canyon Country P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 15 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7248 Brea Blvd Ash St P (TS1) Video 120 120 120 120 120 16 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7249 Brea Blvd Fir St M Video 120 120 120 120 120 17 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7326 Brea Blvd Fire Station #2 M Video 120 120 120 120 120 18 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 149 Brea Blvd Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 19 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7201 Civic Center Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 20 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7239 Cliffwood Av Lambert Rd P (TS2 Type 1) Video 110 50 110 50 50 21 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7241 Delta St Lambert Rd P (TS2 Type 1) Video 110 100 110 F F 22 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7228 Flower Av Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video 65 65 65 65 65 23 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 147 Gateway Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 24 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7218 Kraemer Blvd Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video Cohu 110 F 110 F F 25 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7222 Kraemer Blvd Birch St P (TS2 Type 2) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 26 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7237 Kraemer Blvd Saturn St P (TS1) Video F F F F F 27 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7244 Kraemer Blvd Birch Hills Mall P (TS1) Video Cohu F F F F F 28 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7323 Kraemer Blvd Orbiter St P (TS2 Type 2) Video F F F F F 29 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 153 Kraemer Blvd Imperial Hwy 332 Video 120 120 120 120 120 30 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 514 La Crescenta Dr Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 31 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 515 La Floresta Dr Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 32 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 444 Laurel Av Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 33 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7327 North Mall Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 34 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 154 Pacentia Av Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 35 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7212 Pointe Dr Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video Cohu 110 100 110 F F 36 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7227 Poplar Av Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video 55 50 55 50 50 37 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7207 Puente St Central Av P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 38 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7216 Puente St Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 39 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 140 Puente St Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 40 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7226 Randolph Av Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 41 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 445 Randolph Av Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 42 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7243 Ranger Av Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 43 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7245 Rose Av Vesuvius Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Video F F F F F 44 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 152 Saturn St Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 45 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 88 Shopping Center Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Brea 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 46 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7206 Site Dr Central Av P (TS2 Type 1) Loops 55 50 55 100 100 47 Caltrans 2070 - C8 VMS - BREA 132 SR-57 NB Lambert Rd 332 Loops 110 100 110 100 100 48 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 155 SR-57 NB Ramps Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 49 Caltrans 2070 - C8 VMS - BREA 134 SR-57 SB Lambert Rd 332 Loops 110 100 110 100 100 50 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 446 SR-57 SB Ramps Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 51 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7209 State College Blvd Cliffwood Av M Loops 55 F 55 F F 52 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7210 State College Blvd Balsa Av M Loops 55 F 55 F F 53 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7213 State College Blvd Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video Cohu 110 100 110 100 100 54 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7220 State College Blvd Avocado St P (TS1) Video 55 55 55 55 55 55 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7225 State College Blvd Birch St P (TS1) Video Cohu 100 100 100 F F 56 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7232 State College Blvd Mall North P (TS1) Video 100 100 100 F F 57 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7234 State College Blvd Mall Center P (TS1) Video 100 100 100 F F 58 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7235 State College Blvd Mall South P (TS1) Video 120 120 120 F F 59 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7236 State College Blvd Financial Commons P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 60 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7246 State College Blvd Elm St P (TS2 Type 1) Video F F F F F 61 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 151 State College Blvd Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 62 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7238 Steele Dr Central Av P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 63 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7219 Sunflower St Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video F F F F F 64 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7205 Tamarack Av Central Av P (TS1) Loops 110 100 110 100 100 65 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7240 Tamarack Av Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video 110 100 110 F F 66 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 VMS 7233 Valencia Av Santa Fe Rd P (TS1) Video F F F F F 67 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 None 115 Valencia Av La Entrada Dr 332 Loops F F F F F 68 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 135 Valencia Av Lambert Rd 332 Loops F F F F F 69 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 None 150 Valencia Av Nasa St 332 Loops F F F F F 70 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 156 Valencia Av Imperial Hwy 332 Loops 120 120 120 120 120 71 Caltrans 170/170E - C8 On-Street Master 431 Valencia Av Birch St 332 Loops F F F F F 72 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7328 Voyager Av Birch St P (TS2 Type 1) Video 110 100 110 100 100 73 Brea ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 7214 Wandering Ln Lambert Rd P (TS1) Video 110 F 110 F F OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Brea 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Brea Multisonics VMS 7229 Associated Greenbriar
Brea Multisonics VMS 7231 Berry Mercury
Brea 7321 Carbon Canyon Olinda
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 89 Imperial Shopping Center Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 363 Carbon Canyon Santa Fe County Econolite or Multisonics Econolite ARIES or VMS 6446 Lambert New Residential Construction Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle LengthAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street E/W Street !
! !
!
! !! ! ! !! !
!
!
! !!
!!!
!
!
! !! !!!!!! ! !! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!!!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Beach
Knott
La Palma
Crescent
Western
Stanton
Artesia
Orangethorpe
Malvern
Lincoln
Whitaker
Holder
Ball
Commonwealth
Stage
La Mirada
Auto Center
Orange
Magnolia
Knott
Valley View
Dale
Dale
Valley View
Holder
San Marino
Grand
9th

BUENA PARK

CERRITOS

LAKEWOOD

SANTA FE SPRINGS

FULLERTON

ANAHEIM

LA MIRADA

CYPRESS

LA PALMA
91 §¨¦
5 91
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Buena Park
Twisted Pair
Wireless Link
!
!
Agency Signal Included in LSSP
Agency/Caltrans Signal Not Included in LSSP
! Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
!
! !
!
! !! ! ! !! !
!
! !!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
8 5 4
3 2
1 99
98 97
92 90
89 88
86 85
82 81
80 79
78 71
70 69
68 67
66 63
62 61
60 59
58 57
54 53
52 49
47 46
38 35
34 33
31 28
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
106
105
102
101
100
Beach
Knott
Artesia
Western
Stanton
Orangethorpe
Dale
Malvern
Whitaker
Commonwealth
Stage
Valley View
La Mirada
Auto Center
Magnolia
Dale
Dale
Knott
Beach
Camellia
9th 9th

BUENA PARK

LA MIRADA

CERRITOS

LA PALMA

FULLERTON

ANAHEIM
91 §¨¦
5 OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Buena Park
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Rail
Fiber
Wireless Link
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
!
!!!
!
! !! !!!!!! ! !! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !! ! !!!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
9 7
6 96
95 94
93 91
87 84
83 77
7675 74
73 72
65 64
56 55
51 50
48 45
44 43
42 41 40
3937 36
32 30
29 27 26107
104
103
La Palma
Crescent
Knott
Beach
Dale
Lincoln
Stanton
Western
Valley View
Holder
Ball
Orange
Walker
Holder
Grand
Via Arroyo

ANAHEIM

STANTON

CYPRESS
LA
PALMA

BUENA PARK
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Existing Communications Network
Rail
Fiber
Wireless Link
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Buena Park
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
N
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Buena Park 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Caltrans Multisonics VMS 6254 Artesia Firestone
2 Buena Park M60 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6350 Auto Center Service Dwy P (TS2 Type 2) Other UPS F F F F F 3 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6228 Auto Center Dr Commonwealth Av P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 4 Fullerton M50 Siemens ACTRA 3538 Auto Center Dr Orangethorpe Av 100 90 100 90 90 5 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 168 Beach Blvd Orangethorpe Av 332 Loops Other UPS 130 130 140 130 130 6 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 174 Beach Blvd La Palma Av 332 Loops Other UPS 140 130 140 130 130 7 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 176 Beach Blvd Crescent Ave 332 Loops UPS 140 130 140 130 130 8 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 369 Beach Blvd Medieval Times Driveway 332 Loops Other UPS 140 130 140 130 130 9 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 398 Beach Blvd Stanton Av 332 Loops UPS 140 130 140 130 130 10 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 454 Beach Blvd 10th St 332 Loops Other UPS 130 130 140 130 130 11 Buena Park 2070 - TCSP Tactics 6392 Beach Blvd The Source 332 Loops 130 130 140 130 130 12 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 1 Beach Blvd 91 WB Ramps 13 Caltrans 2070 On-Street Master 158 Beach Blvd La Mirada Blvd 130 130 140 130 130 14 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 159 Beach Blvd Stage Rd 15 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 161 Beach Blvd Artesia Blvd 16 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 163 Beach Blvd Commonwealth Ave 17 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 164 Beach Blvd Auto Center Dr 18 Caltrans 447 Beach Blvd Los Cyotoes Dr
19 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 452 Beach Blvd I-5 SB Ramps 20 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 453 Beach Blvd 9th St 21 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 455 Beach Blvd 91 EB Ramps 22 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 459 Beach Blvd Argyle Dr 23 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 464 Beach Blvd Franklin St 24 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6393 Botryoides Av Artesia Blvd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Other UPS 120 120 130 100 100 25 Buena Park M60 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6399 Brenner Orangethorpe P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 130 130 140 130 130 26 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6213 Buena Park Downtown (East) La Palma Av P (TS1) Video UPS 120 110 120 110 110 27 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6259 Buena Park Downtown (West) La Palma Av P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 28 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 9173 Carpenter's Wy Firestone P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS F F F F F 29 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6246 Dale Crescent P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 30 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6260 Dale Buena Park Downtown P (TS1) Loops UPS 100 100 100 F F 31 Buena Park M60 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6397 Dale Lakeknoll P (TS1) Video Pelco UPS 88 87 88 87 87 32 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6400 Dale Tamarack P (TS1) Video UPS F F F F F 33 Buena Park M60 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6220 Dale St Malvern Av P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 90 120 F F 34 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6223 Dale St Artesia Blvd P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 100 100 100 100 100 35 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6227 Dale St Commonwealth Av P (TS1) Other Other UPS 100 100 100 F F 36 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6242 Dale St La Palma Av P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 37 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6205 El Monte Dr La Palma Av P (TS1) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 38 Fullerton M50 Siemens ACTRA 3468 Emery Ranch Rd Rosecrans Av 100 90 100 90 90 39 Buena Park 2070 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6390 Firestation 61 La Palma 332 UPS F F F F F 40 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6210 Grand Crescent Ave P (TS1) Loops Other UPS F F F F F 41 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6209 Holder Crescent P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 42 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6252 Holder Arroyo P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 43 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6251 Holder St Lincoln Av P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 100 120 120 120 44 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6253 Holder St Ball Rd P (TS1) Loops Other UPS F F F F F 45 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics Holder St Firestion #63 P (TS1) Other F F F F F Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Buena Park 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 46 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6398 Indiana Commonwealth P (TS2 Type 2) Video Other UPS 100 100 100 100 100 47 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6394 Industry Cir Artesia Blvd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Other UPS 60 60 130 50 50 48 Anaheim 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 752 Knott Av Lincoln Av 120 110 120 110 110 49 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6202 Knott Av El Verano Dr P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 50 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6207 Knott Av Holder St P (TS1) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 51 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6212 Knott Av Younger Dr P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 52 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6229 Knott Av 8th St P (TS1) Loops UPS 80 110 80 110 110 53 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6234 Knott Av Orangethorpe Av P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 54 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6237 Knott Av Thelma P (TS1) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 55 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6238 Knott Av La Palma Av P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 56 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6247 Knott Av Crescent Ave P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 57 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6265 Knott Av Mid Counties Wy P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Other UPS 80 110 80 110 110 58 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6266 Knott Av 9th St P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 80 110 80 110 110 59 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6268 Knott Av Caballero Blvd P (TS1) Loops UPS 80 110 80 110 110 60 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 143 Knott Av 91 EB Ramps 61 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 160 Knott Av Artesia Blvd 120 110 120 110 110 62 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 424 Knott Av 91 WB Ramps 63 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6396 La Mirada Blvd Village Circle Wy P (TS2 Type 2) Loops & Video Other UPS 130 130 140 130 130 64 Buena Park Eagle - SEPAC Siemens ACTRA 6258 La Palma Pedestrian Crosswalk 65 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6215 Los Altos Crescent P (TS1) Other UPS F 110 120 F F 66 Fullerton M50 Siemens ACTRA 6385 Magnolia Av Academy Dr 100 90 100 90 90 67 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6255 Mid Counties Wy Artesia Blvd P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 120 130 100 100 68 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6395 Owens St Malvern Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Other UPS 120 90 120 90 90 69 Buena Park M60 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6219 Rockledge Dr Malvern Av P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 90 120 F F 70 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6221 Rostrata Av Artesia Blvd P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 60 65 100 100 71 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6256 Saint Pius V School Orangethorpe P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS F F F F F 72 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6240 San Hilario Ped Xing La Palma Av M Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 73 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6216 San Marino Crescent P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 74 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6206 San Marino Dr La Palma Av P (TS1) Loops UPS 60 110 120 110 110 75 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6204 San Rafael Dr La Palma Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 76 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6257 Stagecoach Xiing La Palma Av M Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 77 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6208 Stanton Maple P (TS1) Loops Pelco UPS F F F F 78 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6214 Stanton Carnation P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 79 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6217 Stanton Page P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 80 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6230 Stanton Whitaker P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 81 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6232 Stanton Auto Center Other Video Pelco UPS F F F F F 82 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6236 Stanton Orangethorpe P (TS1) Video Pelco UPS 130 130 140 130 130 83 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6248 Stanton Crescent P (TS1) Loops Pelco UPS F F F F F 84 Buena Park 820 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6264 Stanton Knott'S Parking Lot P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 85 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6224 Stanton Av Artesia Blvd P (TS2 Type 2) Video Other UPS 100 100 100 100 100 86 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6226 Stanton Av Commonwealth Av P (TS1) Loops BBS 100 100 100 F F 87 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6243 Stanton Av La Palma Av P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 88 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6218 Stanton Ave Malvern Av P (TS1) Loops Other UPS F 90 120 120 120 89 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6201 Valley View St Panama Dr P (TS1) Loops UPS 120 120 130 120 120 90 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6203 Valley View St Patton Wy P (TS1) Loops No UPS 120 120 130 120 120 OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Buena Park 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 91 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6211 Valley View St San Remo Wy P (TS1) Loops No 120 110 120 110 110 92 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6233 Valley View St Orangethorpe Av Other Video Other UPS 120 120 130 120 120 93 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6239 Valley View St La Palma Av P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 120 130 120 120 94 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6244 Valley View St Los Molinos Dr P (TS1) Loops 120 100 120 100 100 95 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6245 Valley View St Crescent Ave P (TS1) Loops Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 96 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6250 Valley View St Los Feliz Dr P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 120 110 120 110 110 97 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6262 Valley View St Artesia Blvd P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 120 130 F F 98 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 8673 Valley View St 183rd St P (TS1) Loops UPS 120 120 120 F F 99 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 3 Valley View St 91 EB Ramps 100 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 141 Valley View St 91 WB Ramps 101 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECM Tactics 6225 Western Auto Center P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS F F F F F 102 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6235 Western Orangethorpe P (TS1) Video Pelco 130 130 140 130 130 103 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6249 Western Crescent P (TS1) Loops Pelco UPS F F F F F 104 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6261 Western N of Santa Elena P (TS1) Other Pelco UPS F F F F F 105 Buena Park 820 - Other Tactics 6267 Western 9th P (TS1) Loops UPS F F F F F 106 Buena Park M50 - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6222 Western Av Artesia Blvd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Other UPS 120 120 130 100 100 107 Buena Park Other - SEPAC ECOM Tactics 6241 Western Av La Palma Av P (TS1) Video Other UPS 120 110 120 110 110 OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Buena Park 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 465 Artesia I-5 NB Ramp Cypress Traconex None 7373 Holder Orange
La Palma Econolite On-Street Master 8660 Walker Thelma
E/W StreetAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle Length Twisted Pair
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Wireless Link
!
!
Agency Signal Included in LSSP
Agency/Caltrans Signal Not Included in LSSP
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Costa Mesa
! Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP

FOUNTAIN VALLEY

HUNTINGTON BEACH

SANTA ANA

NEWPORT
BEACH
IRVINE
COSTA
MESA
N
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
HARBOR
BAKER
19TH
17TH

FAIRVIEW
ADAMS
FAIR

VICTORIA

PLACENTIA

NEWPORT
BEAR

SUNFLOWER

RED HILL
WILSON
GISLER
IRVINE
22ND

SOUTH COAST

BRISTOL
ANTON
HYLAND

ARLINGTON

MESA VERDE

DEL MAR

MERRIMAC

PAULARINO
BALBOA

MACARTHUR

SUPERIOR

SANTA ANA
MAIN

BRISTOL

SUNFLOWER

NEWPORT
0 0.4 0.80.2
Miles
!
!! !
!
!
! !!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
9 8
7 6
5 4
1 96
95 94
90 86
85 84
83 81
80 79
77 75
74 7372
71 69
68 67
66 65
64 62
61 60
59 57
56 55
54 52
51 50
48 47
46 45
44 43
42 41
40 39
38 37
36 35
33 32
3130
29 27
26 25
24 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
10 128
127
124
123
119
118
117
116
115
114
113
112
110
107
106
105
104
103
101
Baker
Harbor
Fairview
Adams
Fair
Sunflower
Bear
Red Hill
Wilson
Gisler
South Coast
Placentia
Anton
Bristol
Hyland
Arlington
Mesa Verde
Del Mar
Merrimac
Paularino
Macarthur
Sakioka
Santa Ana
Sunflower
Bristol
Newport
Newport
Santa Ana
Fairview

FOUNTAIN
VALLEY

SANTA ANA

NEWPORT
BEACH
COSTA
MESA
55 73
§¨¦
405
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Costa Mesa
Twisted Pair
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
Rail
!#
!
Wireless Link
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
3 2
99 98
97 93
92 91
90 89
88 87
86 85
82 81
78 76
70 65
63 58
57 53
49 43
34 29
28 129
126
125
122
121
120
110
109
108
104
102
101
100
111
19th
17th
Victoria
Placentia
Wilson
Irvine
Harbor
Newport
22ndBalboa
Fairview
Superior

NEWPORT
BEACH

HUNTINGTON
BEACH
COSTA
MESA
241
1 Twisted Pair
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Existing Communications Network
Rail
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Costa Mesa
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Costa Mesa 6/1/2021

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4520 Alba tross Adams Av P (TS2 Type Loops 130 F 130 F F 2 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4461 American Victoria P (TS1) Loops 130 110 130 110 110 3 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4494 Anaheim 19th P (TS1) Loops 100 100 100 100 100 4 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4480 Anton Sunflower P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu BBS 130 65 130 130 130 5 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4551 Avenue of the Arts Anton P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 6 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4452 Avenue of the Arts Sunflower P (TS1) Loops Bosch 130 65 130 F F 7 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4457 Babb Baker P (TS1) Loops 65 90 65 90 90 8 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4476 Bear Sunflower P (TS1) Loops Bosch 130 110 130 F F 9 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4509 Bear Baker P (TS1) Other Cohu 130 90 130 90 90 10 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4453 Bear Metro Pointe E P (TS1) Loops Bosch 130 110 130 F F 11 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4481 Bear Crys tal Court/Town Center P (TS1) Loops Bosch 130 110 130 F F 12 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4484 Bear South Coast P (TS1) Loops Bosch 130 110 130 F F 13 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4488 Be ar Paularino/Yukon P (TS2 Type Loops F F F F F 14 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4738 Bristo l SOBECA P (TS2 Type 2) Other Cohu 100 120 104 120 120 15 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 275 Bristol Newport NB P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 100 80 104 90 90 16 Caltrans 820 - Multisonics On-Street Master 85 Bristol 405 SB 332 Loops 17 Caltrans 820 - Multisonics On-Str eet Master 231 Bristol 405 NB 332 Loops 18 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 270 Bristol Red Hill 332 Loops Cohu F F F F F 19 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 272 Bristol S B Newport P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu BBS 100 80 104 90 90 20 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4467 Bristol Bear M Loops 100 120 104 120 120 21 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4478 Br istol Sunflower P (TS1) Other Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 22 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4482 Bristol Town Center P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 23 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4485 Bristol Anton P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 24 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4489 Bristol Paularino P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 25 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4510 Bristol Baker P (TS2 Type Other Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 26 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4553 Bristol Randolph P (TS1) Loops 100 120 100 120 120 27 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4566 Bristol Hotel M Loops 130 130 130 130 130 28 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4462 Canyon Victoria P (TS1) Loops 130 110 130 110 110 29 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4468 Center Wilson M Loops 130 130 130 F F 30 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4507 College Baker P (TS1) Loops 130 130 130 130 130 31 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4466 Coolidge Baker P (TS1) Loops 65 90 130 90 90 32 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4741 Experian Anton P (TS1) Loops Cohu F F F F F 33 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4561 Fairgrounds Fair P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 34 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4538 Fairview Newport 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 35 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4454 Fairview Paularino P (TS1) Loops 130 120 130 120 120 36 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4459 Fairview Monitor P (TS1) Video 110 110 110 110 110 37 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4472 Fairvi ew Sunflower P (TS1) Video Cohu BBS 130 120 130 120 120 38 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4483 Fairview South Coast P (TS1) Video Cohu BBS 130 120 130 120 120 39 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4508 Fairview Baker P (TS1) Video Cohu BBS 130 120 130 120 120 40 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4514 Fairview Adams P (TS2 Type Video Cohu BBS 130 120 130 120 120 41 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4522 Fairview Arlington P (TS1) Video Bosch 110 110 110 110 110 42 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4524 Fairview Merrimac P (TS1) Video 110 110 110 110 110 43 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4533 Fairview Wilson P (TS1) Video Cohu 110 110 110 110 110 44 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4560 Fairview Fair P (TS1) Video Cohu BBS 110 110 110 110 110 45 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4562 Fairview OCC P (TS1) Video 110 110 110 110 110 Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV

OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Costa Mesa 6/1/2021

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 46 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4564 Fairview McCormack M Loops 130 120 130 120 120 47 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4458 Firestation #2 Baker St M Loops F F F F F 48 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4471 Fuschi a/Raitt Sunflower P (TS2 Type Loops 130 60 130 F F 49 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4463 Harb or Hamilton P (TS2 Type Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 50 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4469 Harbor Scenic P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 51 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4474 Harb or Sunflower P (TS1) Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 52 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4487 Harbor Gisler P (TS2 Type Other Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 53 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4498 Harbor 19th P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 54 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4517 Harbor Adams P (TS2 Type Other Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 55 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4523 Harb or Merrimac P (TS2 Type Loops 130 130 130 130 130 56 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4528 Harbor Fair P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 57 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4534 Harbor Wilson P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 58 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4542 Harbor Victoria P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 59 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4558 Harbor Law Court P (TS1) Loops 130 130 130 130 130 60 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4559 Harbor South Coast P (TS1) Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 61 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4569 Harb or Baker P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 62 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4570 Harbor Mesa Verde E P (TS2 Type Loops 130 130 130 130 130 63 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4571 Harbor Bay P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 130 130 130 130 64 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4722 Harbor Nutmeg P (TS1) Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 65 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4725 Harb or Harbor Center P (TS1) Loops 130 130 130 130 130 66 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4734 Harbor Date P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 67 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4473 Hyland Sunflower P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 68 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4455 Jian Paularino M Loops 65 65 65 65 65 69 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4527 Loyola Fair Dr P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 70 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4555 Maple Victoria M Video 130 110 130 110 110 71 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4456 Me ndoza Baker St P (TS1) Loops 130 90 130 90 90 72 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4519 Mesa Verde W Adams P (TS1) Loops Cohu BBS 130 110 130 110 110 73 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4518 Mesa Verde E Adams P (TS1) Loops 130 110 130 110 110 74 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4568 Metro Pointe E South Coast M Loops F F F F F 75 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4567 Metr o Pointe W South Coast P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 76 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4496 Me yer 19th P (TS2 Type Loops 100 100 100 100 100 77 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4465 Milbro Baker P (TS1) Loops 130 90 130 90 90 78 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4540 National Victoria P (TS1) Loops 120 95 130 F F 79 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 279 Newport SB Mesa 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 80 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4529 Newport SB Fair/Del Mar 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 81 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4537 Newport SB Wilson 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 82 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4548 Newport SB Bay 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 83 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 346 Newport NB Mesa 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 84 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4526 Newport NB Del Mar 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 85 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4532 Newport NB Santa Isabel 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 86 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4535 Newport NB Wilson 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 87 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4545 Newport NB 22nd 332 Loops Cohu BBS 100 80 100 80 80 88 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4547 Newport NB Bay 332 Loops 100 80 100 80 80 90 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4460 Ne wport SB Vanguard Other Loops 100 80 100 80 80 91 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4544 Newpor t SB Victoria P (TS1) Loops Cohu BBS 100 80 100 80 80

OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Costa Mesa 6/1/2021

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 92 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4504 Orange 17th P (TS1) Loops Cohu 90 90 90 90 90 93 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4495 Park 19th P (TS1) Loops 100 100 100 100 100 94 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4451 Pa rk Center Sunflower P (TS1) Loops 130 130 130 F F 95 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4742 Park Center Anton P (TS1) Loops 100 80 100 80 80 96 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4515 Pinecreek Adams Av P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 110 130 100 100 97 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4493 Placentia 19th P (TS1) Loops Cohu 100 100 100 100 100 98 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4499 Placentia 18th P (TS1) Loops 100 100 100 100 100 99 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4502 Placentia 17th P (TS1) Loops Cohu 100 100 100 100 100 100 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4506 Placentia 16th P (TS1) Loops 100 100 100 100 100 101 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4536 Placentia Wilson P (TS1) Loops Cohu 100 100 100 100 100 102 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4541 Placentia Victoria P (TS1) Loops Cohu 130 110 130 110 110 103 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4563 Pl acentia Fairview Park M Loops 100 100 100 100 100 104 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4565 Placentia Estancia South P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 105 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 4743 Placentia Bike Xing P (TS2 Type Other 106 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4744 Placentia Estancia North P (TS1) Loops 100 100 100 100 100 107 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4477 Plaza Sunflower M Loops 130 110 130 F F 108 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4464 Pomona 19th P (TS1) Loops 100 100 100 100 100 109 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4539 Pomona Victoria P (TS1) Loops 130 110 130 110 110 110 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4745 Pomona Wilson M Loops 130 110 130 110 110 111 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4746 Pomona-Industrial 16th P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 112 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4747 Pullman Baker St P (TS2 Type Loops 90 90 90 85 85 113 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4511 Red Hill Paularino P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 114 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4513 Re d Hill Baker P (TS1) Loops Cohu 120 F 130 F F 115 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4521 Red Hill Kalmus P (TS1) Loops Bosch F F F F F 116 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4490 Royal Palm Baker St P (TS1) Loops 65 65 65 65 65 117 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4516 Royal Palm Adams Av P (TS1) Loops 130 110 130 110 110 118 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4479 Sa kioka Sunflower P (TS2 Type Loops 130 F 130 F F 119 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4552 Sakioka Anton P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 120 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4505 Santa Ana 17th P (TS1) Loops Bosch 90 90 90 90 90 121 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4503 Superior 17th P (TS1) Loops 90 75 80 75 75 123 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4475 Susan Sunflower P (TS1) Loops Bosch 65 120 130 F F 124 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4557 Susan South Coast P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 125 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4550 Tustin 17th P (TS1) Loops 90 90 90 90 90 126 Costa Mesa ACS/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4543 Valley Victoria P (TS2 Type Loops Cohu 130 110 130 110 110 127 Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4525 Vanguard Fair Dr P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 128 Costa Mesa 820 - Multisonics Centracs 4748 Vista (Enclave) Sakioka P (TS1) Loops F F F F F 129 Costa Mesa ASC/3 - ASC/3 Centracs 4749 Westminster 17th M Loops 90 90 90 90 90

OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Costa Mesa 6/1/2021

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 61 I-405 N Exit 11C Harbor Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 63 Fairview I-405 N Exit 11B Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 64 I-405 S Exit 11B Harbor Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 65 Fairview I-405 S Exit 11A Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 67 Ca-73 N Ramp 17C Ca-73 N Exit 17C Caltrans Multisonics VMS 97 Anton I-405 N
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 98 Newport Broadway Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 252 Paularino Sr-55 S Exit 5B Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 253 Paularino Sr-55 N Ramp 5B Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 254 Ca-73 S Ramp 17B Bear Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 255 Newport Harbor Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 257 Newport 19Th
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 262 Newport Rochester Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 263 Newport 16Th
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 265 Baker Sr-55 S Frontage Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 267 Baker Sr-55 N Frontage Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 279 Newport Mesa
Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 289 Newport Industrial Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 345 South Coast I-405 N Exit 11A Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 367 Hyland South Coast Costa Mesa Cobalt - ASC/3 Centracs 4470 Greenville/Wimbledon Sunflower P (TS2 Type Loops 130 60 130 0 0 E/W StreetAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle Length 241
91 §¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 §¨¦
405
§¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 73
55 57
22 §¨¦
5 §¨¦
15 IRVINE

ANAHEIM
ORANGE

SANTA ANA
TUSTIN

NEWPORT BEACH

HUNTINGTON BEACH

LAKE FOREST

COSTA MESA

MISSION VIEJO

FULLERTON

GARDEN GROVE

YORBA LINDA

BUENA PARK

CYPRESS

WESTMINSTER

LAGUNA NIGUEL

ALISO VIEJO

FOUNTAIN VALLEY

PLACENTIA

STANTON

LAGUNA BEACH

LAGUNA HILLS

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA

LOS ALAMITOS

LAGUNA WOODS

VILLA PARK

LA PALMA

SEAL BEACH

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
County of Orange
Twisted Pair
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Twisted Pair and Fiber
Wireless Link
! Agency Signal Included in LSSP
! Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP
N
024 1
Miles
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!

VILLA PARK
N
Palm
Glassell
Orange Olive
Esperanza
Lincoln
!!
!

YORBA LINDA

PLACENTIA

FULLERTON

ANAHEIM
ORANGE
69 39 32
Imperial
Kellogg
Twisted Pair
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Rail
Wireless Link
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
County of Orange
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
Lo
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!65 46
45 36
34 33
18 17
trebliG
Katella
Cerritos
Ball
Bolsa
dnalweN
hcaeB
Orange
Broadway
Bolsa
§¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 §¨¦
405
22 Twisted Pair
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Rail
Wireless Link
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
County of Orange
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.5 1
Miles
!67

LOS ALAMITOS

SANTA ANA

ANAHEIM

ANAHEIM

STANTON

BUENA PARKLA PALMA

CYPRESS

GARDEN GROVE

WESTMINSTER

SEAL BEACH

HUNTINGTON BEACH

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
ORANGE

GARDEN GROVE
#!68

!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!66
61 59
55 53
52 51
50 49
48 47
38 37
31 30
29 Newport
17th
tloH
Fairhaven
Hewes
EsplanadeSanta Clara
abroY
Prospect Foothill
Crawford Canyon
Irvine
Chapman
17th
Chapman
Dodge
ORANGE
TUSTIN
TUSTIN

SANTA ANA
IRVINE

ORANGE CO

VILLA PARK
55 261
22 Twisted Pair
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Rail
Twisted Pair and Fiber
Wireless Link
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
County of Orange
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
! !!!
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 646362
57 54
44 43
4241
4028
27 26
25 24
23 22
19 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
Ortega
Oso
Antonio
Cow Camp
Los Patrones
Crown Valley
Grandeza
Cristianitos
El Toro
Chiquita Canyon
Esencia
Alton
Fauna
Ortega
IRVINE

MISSION VIEJO

LAKE FOREST

LAGUNA NIGUEL

ALISO VIEJO

LAGUNA HILLS

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO

LAGUNA WOODS
241
§¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 73
Twisted Pair
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Rail
Twisted Pair and Fiber
Wireless Link
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
County of Orange
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
Caltrans Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
N
012 0.5
Miles

!60
17th
Campus
Irvine
15th
Santa Ana
University
Newport
Adams
Balboa
Bristol
22nd St

COSTA MESA

NEWPORT BEACH
IRVINE
IRVINE

HUNTINGTON
BEACH
Twisted Pair
Existing Communications Network
Fiber
Parks
Waterways
Rail
Twisted Pair and Fiber
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
County of Orange
Traffic Signals
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID!#
Wireless Link
N
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 County of Orange 6/1/2021

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 County Cobalt Airoso Chiquita Canyon Rd NEMA VDS Yes 0 0 0 0 0 2 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6442 Altura Oso Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 3 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6401 Antonio Pkwy Covenant Hills Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 140 100 100 4 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6406 Antonio Pkwy Oaktree Ln P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 70 120 75 75 5 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6407 Antonio Pkwy Meandering Trail P (TS1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 70 120 75 75 6 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6441 Antonio Pkwy Oso Pkwy P (TS1) Loops Cohu BBS 140 140 140 150 150 7 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6443 Antonio Pkwy Sweetwater P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 70 120 75 75 8 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6447 Antonio Pkwy Windmill Av P (TS2 Type 1) Video Cohu BBS 120 100 140 100 100 9 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6451 Antonio Pkwy Crown Valley Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 140 100 100 10 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6452 Antonio Pkwy O'Neill Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 140 100 100 11 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6453 Antonio Pkwy Avendale Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 100 140 100 100 12 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6454 Antonio Pkwy Terrace Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 100 140 100 100 13 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6455 Antonio Pkwy Station Wy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 100 140 100 100 14 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6456 Antonio Pkwy Benjamin Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 100 140 100 100 15 County ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA 6460 Antonio Pkwy Cow Camp Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Video Cohu UPS 120 100 140 100 100 16 County ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA 6560 Antonio Pkwy Sendero Wy P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 120 100 140 100 100 17 Caltrans-75 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 221 Beach Blvd Bolsa Av 18 Caltrans-75 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 225 Beach Blvd McFadden Av 19 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6404 Bridle Path Oso Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 22 County ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA 6561 Chiquita Canyon Dr Cow Camp Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 23 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6448 Crown Valley Pkwy Sienna Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 140 130 140 130 130 24 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6449 Crown Valley Pkwy Cecil Pasture Rd P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 140 130 140 130 130 25 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6450 Crown Valley Pkwy O'Neill Dr P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 140 130 140 130 130 26 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES 6439 El Toro Rd Valley Vista Wy P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 70 0 130 0 0 27 County Cobalt Esencia Chiquita Canyon Rd NEMA VDS Yes 0 0 0 0 0 28 County ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA 6562 Esencia Dr Cow Camp Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Video Cohu UPS 29 County ASC/3 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6445 Esplanade Fairhaven NEMA Loops Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 0 30 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6420 Esplanade Av 17th St P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 110 100 110 100 100 31 County ASC/3 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6444 Fairhaven Prospect NEMA Loops Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 0 32 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6413 Fairlynn Blvd Esperanza Rd P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 33 Garden Grove - 25% ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA 6550 Garza Av Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops UPS 120 120 120 120 120 34 County ASC/3 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6412 Gilbert Chanticleer NEMA Yes 0 0 0 0 0 36 County ASC/2 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6423 Hazard Newland NEMA Yes 0 0 0 0 0 37 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6457 Hewes Av 17th St P (TS2 Type 1) Video UPS 110 100 110 100 100 38 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6417 Holt Av 17th St P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 110 100 110 100 100 39 Caltrans 513 Imperial Hwy Esperanza Rd
40 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA 6563 Los Patrones Pkwy Cow Camp Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 41 County Cobalt Los Patrones Pkwy NB On Ramp Chiquita Canyon Rd NEMA VDS Yes 0 0 0 0 0 42 County Cobalt Los Patrones Pkwy SB Off Ramp Chiquita Canyon Rd NEMA VDS Yes 0 0 0 0 0 43 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6405 Meandering Trail Oso Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 120 120 44 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6409 Morning Trail Oso Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 120 120 120 120 45 County ASC/2 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6403 Newland Madison NEMA Yes 0 0 0 0 0 46 Westminster - 50% ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6438 Newland St Bolsa Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 47 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6421 Newport 17th St P (TS2 Type 2) Video BBS 0 0 0 0 0 48 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6402 Newport Av La Loma Dr P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 130 130 130 130 130 Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV

OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 County of Orange 6/1/2021

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 49 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6422 Newport Av La Colina Dr P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 50 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6427 Newport Av Crawford Canyon Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 51 County ACS/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6428 Newport Av Cowan Heights Dr P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 130 130 130 130 130 52 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6433 Newport Av Foothill Blvd P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 130 130 130 130 130 53 County Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6437 Newport Av Dodge Av P (TS2 Type 2) Video Cohu UPS 130 130 130 130 130 54 County ASC/2 O'Neill Dr Cecil Pasture Dr NEMA Loops Yes 0 0 0 0 0 55 County ACS/2 - Econolite (NEMA) Econolite ARIES or VMS 6424 Orange Park Blvd Chapman Av P (TS1) Loops BBS 57 County ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6410 Plaza Entrance Oso Pkwy P (TS2 Type 1) Loops BBS 120 120 120 120 120 59 Tustin - 75% Cobalt - ASC3/NEMA Econolite ARIES or VMS 6419 Prospect Av 17th St P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 110 100 110 100 100 60 County ASC/2 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6440 Santa Ana Mesa NEMA Yes 0 0 0 0 0 61 County 820 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6426 Spring Hewes NEMA Yes 0 0 0 0 0 62 Caltrans-33 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 364 SR-241 NB On Ramp Oso Pkwy 63 Caltrans-33 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 116 SR-241 SB On Ramp Oso Pkwy 64 Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 365 Tesoro Creek Rd Oso Pkwy 65 County ASC/3 - ASC3/NEMA 6564 Van Buren St Bolsa Av P (TS2 Type 2) Video UPS 130 130 130 130 130 66 County ASC/3 Econolite ARIES or VMS 6430 Yorba Fairhaven NEMA Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 0 67 County Other - Econolite (NEMA) Centracs 6411 Nearing Chapman Av Other Loops 130 130 130 130 130 68 County 2070 Siemens ACTRA or UTCS 796 Gilbert St Cerritos Av Econolite Type P None 69 County ASC/3 - ASC/3 VMS 6415 Batavia Lincoln Av 120 120 120 120 120

! ! ! !!! !! !
!! !! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !! !! !! !
!
! ! ! !!! !!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 47
46 45
44 43
42 41
40 39
38 37
36 35
34 33
32 31
30 29
28 27
26 25
2423
22 21
20 19
18 1716
15 14
13 12
11 10Ball
Walker
Orange
Cerritos
Moody
Denni
Valley View
Lincoln
Katella
Holder
Knott
Orangewood
Crescent
Bloomfield
Lexington
Springdale
Holder

CYPRESS

HAWAIIAN

GARDENS

LAKEWOOD

LOS ALAMITOS

BUENA PARK

ANAHEIM

STANTON
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Cypress
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
!#
!
Fiber
Wireless Link
N
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Cypress 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7378 Bloomfield Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F F F F 2 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7395 Bloomfield Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F F F F 3 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7359 Camden Cerritos Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 120 100 120 100 100 4 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 8801 Cottonwood Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 5 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7369 Denni Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F F F F 6 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7379 Denni Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F F F F 7 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7383 Denni Cerritos Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Axis F F F F F 8 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7361 Douglas Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 9 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7353 Grindlay Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 90 90 100 F F 10 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7443 Grindlay Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops F F F F F 11 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7387 Holder Cerritos Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 60 60 60 100 100 12 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7391 Holder Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 13 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7364 Home Depot Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 120 100 120 100 100 14 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7362 Hope Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 15 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7357 Juanita Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 120 100 120 100 100 16 Cypress 2070 - SEPAC Aries 7366 Katella Av Dino Cir P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 17 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7363 Meridian Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 18 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7370 Moody Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu 90 90 100 100 100 19 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7382 Moody Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F F F F 20 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7384 Moody Cerritos Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F F F F 21 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7388 Siboney Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 22 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7358 Sorrento Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops F F F F F 23 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7444 Sumner Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops F F F F F 24 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7372 Valley View Lincoln Av Other Loops Cohu 120 100 120 100 100 25 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7380 Valley View Ball Rd Other Loops Cohu 120 100 120 100 100 26 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7386 Valley View Cerritos Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu 120 100 120 100 100 27 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7390 Valley View Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 28 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7354 Valley View St Lakeshore P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 29 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7356 Valley View St Fred P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 30 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7360 Valley View St Gateway Other Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 31 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7367 Valley View St Plaza P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 32 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7374 Valley View St Orange P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 33 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7392 Valley View St Warland P (TS2 Type 2) Loops BBS 120 100 120 100 100 34 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7393 Valley View St Orangewood Other Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 35 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7445 Valley View St Cypress HS P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 36 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7446 Via Largo Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops F F F F F 37 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7371 Walker Lincoln Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu 90 90 100 100 100 38 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7381 Walker Ball Rd P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu 120 100 120 100 100 39 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7385 Walker Cerritos Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu 120 100 120 100 100 40 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7389 Walker Katella Av P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu BBS 120 100 120 100 100 41 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7365 Walker St Myra P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 120 F 120 F F 42 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7368 Walker St Crescent P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F 120 F F 43 Cypress ACS/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7375 Walker St Orange P (TS2 Type 2) Loops Cohu F F 120 F F 44 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7397 Walker St Newman Ped Xing P (TS2 Type 2) Loops F F 120 F F 45 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7447 Walker St Costco Way P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 120 F F F F Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Cypress 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 46 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7448 Walker St Delong P (TS2 Type 2) Loops F F 120 F F 47 Cypress ASC/3 - ASC/3 Aries 7449 Walker St Vessels Circle P (TS2 Type 2) Loops 120 F F F F OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Cypress 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cypress Traconex None 7351 Crescent Carob
Cypress Econolite Econolite ARIES 7352 Moody Merten
Cypress Econolite Econolite ARIES 7355 Orange Grindley
Cypress Traconex None 7373 Holder Orange
Cypress Econolite Econolite ARIES 7376 Orange Moody
Cypress Traconex None 7377 Denni Orange
Cypress Multisonics None 7394 Springdale Holder
Cypress Econolite Econolite ARIES 7396 Moody Myra
Cypress Econolite Econolite ARIES 7398 Cerritos W of Ritter Cypress 7399 Orange Bloomfield
Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle LengthAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street E/W Street !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
! !! !! !
!
!
!
!! !!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
Selva
Pacific Coast
Pacific Coast
Stonehill
Niguel
Del Obispo
Del Prado
Golden Lantern
Crown Valley
Dana Point Harbor
Doheny Park
Pacific Coast

DANA POINT

LAGUNA NIGUEL

SAN JUAN

CAPISTRANO
§¨¦
5 §¨¦
5 1
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Dana Point
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP
Rail
!#
!
N
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Dana Point 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Dana Point Cobalt On-Street Master 8048 Blue Lantern Pacific Coast Hwy 2 Dana Point ASC/2 On-Street Master 7960 Golden Lantern Terra Vista 3 Dana Point ASC/2 On-Street Master 7963 Golden Lantern Acapulco Dr 4 Dana Point ASC/2 On-Street Master 7967 Golden Lantern Stonehill Dr 5 Dana Point ASC/2 On-Street Master 7972 Golden Lantern Selva Rd 6 Dana Point ASC/2 On-Street Master 7974 Golden Lantern La Cresta Dr 7 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7953 Pacific Coast Hwy Amber Lantern 8 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7954 Pacific Coast Hwy Monarch Bay Plaza 9 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7962 Pacific Coast Hwy Crown Valley 10 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7969 Pacific Coast Hwy Shoreline Dr 11 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7973 Pacific Coast Hwy Selva Rd 12 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7975 Pacific Coast Hwy Golden Lantern 13 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7976 Pacific Coast Hwy Violet Lantern 14 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7979 Pacific Coast Hwy Del Prado Av 15 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7980 Pacific Coast Hwy Del Obispo St 16 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7983 Pacific Coast Hwy Crystal Lantern 17 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7985 Pacific Coast Hwy Doheny Park Plaza 18 Dana Point ASC/3 8049 Pacific Coast Hwy Ruby Lantern 19 Dana Point 170/170E On-Street Master 7955 Park Lantern Dana Point Harbor Dr 20 Dana Point ASC/3 8050 Puerto Pl Dana Point Harbor Dr Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Dana Point 9/11/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7951 Crown Valley Sea Island Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7952 Stonehill Palo Alto Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7958 Niguel Corniche Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7959 Coast Palisades Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7961 Niguel Monarch Beach Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7965 Stonehill Street Of The Blue Lantern Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7966 Stonehill Ocean Hill Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7968 Selva Stonehill Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7970 Stonehill Del Obispo Dana Point 170 On-Street Master 7977 Pacific Coast Copper Lantern Dana Point 170 On-Street Master 7978 Street Of The Golden Lantern Del Prado Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7981 Dana Point Harbor Street Of The Golden Lantern Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7984 Village Del Obispo Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7986 Stonehill Niguel Dana Point 7988 Resort Niguel Tennis Villas
Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7989 Niguel Mariner Dana Point Multisonics On-Street Master 7990 Victoria Doheny Park Caltrans 170 - C4/C8 On-Street Master 450 Doheny Park PCH North Exit Caltrans Multisonics On-Street Master 7982 Pacific Coast Doheny Park Caltrans On-Street Master 7987 Pacific Coast Doubletree Guest Suites E/W StreetAgency Controller System OCTA ID N/S Street Cabinet Detection CCTV Power Backup Cycle Length !
! ! !
!
!
!
!! !! !
!
!! ! !! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !! !! ! !! !
! !
!
!! !! !! !!!
! !! !! ! ! !!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 58
57 56
55 54
53 52
51 50
49 48
47 46
45 44
43 42
41 40
39 38
37 36 3534
33 32
31 30
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
Ellis
Slater
Euclid
Talbert
Warner
WardBushard
Heil
Brookhurst
Newhope
Magnolia
Edinger
Harbor
Heil
Edinger
Harbor
Warner

FOUNTAIN
VALLEY
SANTA
ANA
COSTA
MESA

HUNTINGTON
BEACH
§¨¦
405
OCTA TSSMP Update 2020
City of Fountain Valley
Twisted Pair
Parks
Waterways
Traffic Signals
Existing Communications Network
Agency Signal Included in LSSP - Reference ID
Rail
!#
Fiber
Wireless Link
Agency/Caltrans Signal - Not Included in LSSP !
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N
OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Fountain Valley 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
1 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7062 Brookhurst Talbert Av 333 Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 2 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7070 Brookhurst Ellis 332 Video Cohu UPS 140 120 140 120 120 3 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7074 Brookhurst Edinger Av 332 Video Bosch UPS 140 130 140 130 130 4 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7075 Brookhurst Heil P (TS2 Type 1) Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 5 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7080 Brookhurst Warner Av 333 Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 6 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7088 Brookhurst Slater 333 Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 7 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7051 Brookhurst St La Alameda 333 Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 8 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7054 Brookhurst St Quail 332 Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 9 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7146 Brookhurst St La Hacienda 332 Loops Cohu UPS 140 120 140 120 120 10 Fountain Valley 2070 - BL Tran 2033 QuicNet 7149 Brookhurst St Stonefield 333 Loops Cohu UPS 140 120 140 120 120 11 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7061 Bushard Talbert Av 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 12 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7068 Bushard Ellis 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 13 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7078 Bushard Heil 332 Loops 65 60 65 60 60 14 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7085 Bushard Warner Av 332 Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 15 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7093 Bushard Slater 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 16 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7058 Bushard St El Camino 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 17 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7073 Bushard St Edinger 333 Video 130 120 130 120 120 18 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7063 Euclid Talbert Av 333 Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 19 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7071 Euclid Edinger Av 333 Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 20 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7077 Euclid Heil 332 Loops Cohu 130 60 130 60 60 21 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7081 Euclid Warner Av 333 Video Cohu UPS 130 120 130 120 120 22 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7089 Euclid Slater 332 Loops Cohu UPS 130 120 130 120 120 23 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7066 Euclid St Condor 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 24 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7095 Euclid St Kalama River 332 Loops Cohu 65 60 65 60 60 25 Fountain Valley 2070 - BL Tran 2033 QuicNet 7099 Euclid St Hospital Campus 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 26 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7100 Euclid St Southpark P (TS2 Type 1) Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 27 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7059 Foster Talbert Av 332 Loops Cohu 130 65 130 65 65 28 Fountain Valley 2070 - BL Tran 2033 QuicNet 7165 Greenleaf Warner Av 332 Video Bosch UPS 140 120 140 120 120 29 Fountain Valley 820 - Bl Tran 2033 Centracs 2585 Harbor Edinger Av P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu 30 Fountain Valley 820 - Bl Tran 2033 Centracs 2596 Harbor Heil P (TS2 Type 1) Loops 31 Fountain Valley 820 - Bl Tran 2033 Centracs 2443 Harbor Blvd Lilac 333 Loops Cohu 32 Fountain Valley 2070 - BL Tran 2033 QuicNet 7166 Hyundai Talbert Av 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 33 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7060 Las Flores Ellis 332 Loops Cohu 65 60 65 60 60 34 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7053 Loa Alamos Slater P (TS2 Type 1) Loops 85 85 85 85 85 35 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7052 Los Jardines East Slater P (TS2 Type 1) Loops 85 85 85 85 85 36 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7087 Los Jardines West Slater P (TS2 Type 1) Loops 85 85 85 85 85 37 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7098 Los Jardines West Warner Av 332 Video 130 120 130 120 120 38 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7065 Magnolia Talbert Av 332 Video Cohu UPS 140 130 140 130 130 39 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7067 Magnolia Ellis 332 Loops Bosch UPS 140 130 140 130 130 40 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7079 Magnolia Heil 332 Loops Bosch UPS 140 130 140 130 130 41 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7094 Magnolia Slater 332 Loops Bosch UPS 140 130 140 130 130 42 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 6070 Magnolia Av Foxglove P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Bosch UPS 70 65 70 65 65 43 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7086 Magnolia Av Warner P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu UPS 140 130 140 130 130 44 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7097 Mt. Hermann Slater 332 Video Cohu 65 60 65 60 60 45 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7084 Mt. Hope Warner Av 333 Video 130 120 130 120 120 Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Fountain Valley 8/24/2020

AM MD PM SAT SUN
Cycle LengthSignal ID Agency Controller System OCTA ID Power BackupN/S Street E/W Street Cabinet Detection CCTV 46 Fountain Valley 2070 - BL Tran 2033 QuicNet 7167 Mt. Washington Talbert Av 332 Video Bosch 130 120 130 120 120 47 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7076 Newhope Heil 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 48 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7083 Newhope Warner Av 332 Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 49 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7091 Newhope Slater 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 50 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7096 Newhope Talbert Av 332 Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 51 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7056 Newhope St Southpark P (TS2 Type 1) Video Cohu 65 60 65 60 60 52 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7057 Newhope St Post Office 333 Loops F F F F F 53 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7090 San Mateo Slater P (TS2 Type 1) Video 85 85 85 85 85 54 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7064 Ward Talbert Av 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 55 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7069 Ward Ellis P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 56 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7072 Ward Edinger Av 332 Loops Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 57 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7082 Ward Warner Av 332 Video Cohu 130 120 130 120 120 58 Fountain Valley 2070 - Bl Tran 2033 QuicNet 7092 Ward Slater P (TS2 Type 1) Loops Cohu 85 85 85 85 85 OCTA Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update 2020 City of Fountain Valley 8/24/2020