AGENDA
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of the City Council
Tuesday, November 7, 2023
Closed Session 5:30 p.m.
Public Session 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California
NOTICE
: Pursuant to Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 2.04.010, Regular Meetings of the City Council are held the First and Third Tuesday of each month at the hour of 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session matters, if required.
The Public Session of the meeting shall commence at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Special Meeting times may be held at a different time and date as listed on the Agenda.
AGENDA DOCUMENT REVIEW:
The Agenda and staff reports are available on the Internet at
https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas
and at the City
Clerk’s Office, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, on the Friday before the meeting on Tuesday.
AGENDA DESCRIPTION:
The Agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public of a general summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The listed Recommended Action represents staff’s recommendation. The City Council may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the recommended action.
AGENDA ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
This meeting will be streamed through Facebook Live. Comments will not be taken via Facebook Live. The City provides the Facebook Live stream as an additional service to the public.
However, the City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted. The City is not responsible for any interrupted service.
SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEETING AND PUBLIC COMMENT:
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
In addition to attending in person, members of the public may access the meeting live on our website at
https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas .
PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO THE MEETING:
Members of the public may submit email comments to
[email protected]
. Email comments will be uploaded to the agenda packet and made part of the official public record of the meeting and will not be read at the meeting. To ensure staff reviews all comments prior to the City Council meeting, please submit email comments no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Members of the public may provide comments in-person at the meeting. Public comments will no longer be accepted remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in-person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk.
To ensure prompt distribution to the City Council, members of the public wishing to provide written materials to the City Council should do so prior to the start of the meeting or as close thereto as possible, as time will not be taken during the public comment period to distribute written materials to the City Council.
November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER:
5:30 p.m.
Council Members:
Robert
Pequeño
Scott Voigts
Benjamin Yu
Mayor Pro Tem:
Mark
Tettemer
Mayor:
Doug Cirbo
City Manager:
Debra Rose
City Attorney:
Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk:
Lisa Berglund
CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT:
CLOSED SESSION: At this time, the City Council may recess to Closed Session for conference with Legal Counsel to discuss the items listed below pursuant to Government Code requirements. Any items not concluded by 6:30 p.m. may be continued to the end of the Public Session.
At this time, members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items listed on the Closed Session agenda. No action may be taken on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. Comments shall be limited to three minutes per item. Any person wishing to address the City Council on a Closed Session matter is requested to complete a "Request to Speak" form available at agenda public review table near the entrance. The completed form is to be submitted to the City Clerk prior to an individual being heard by the City Council.
Whenever possible, lengthy testimony should be
presented to the City Council in writing (8 copies) and only pertinent points presented orally.
CLOSED SESSION (Item No. 1)
CLOSED SESSION: At this time, the City Council may recess to Closed Session for conference with Legal Counsel to discuss the items listed below pursuant to Government Code requirements. Any items not concluded by 6:30 p.m. may be continued to the end of the Public Session.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.9(D)(4)
NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 2
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct closed session.
RECESS:
City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business.
RECONVENE
:
City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business.
November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PUBLIC SESSION:
6:30 p.m.
PUBLIC SESSION: At this time, the City Council will convene to consider public matters. Those wishing to address the City Council must submit a completed “Request to Speak” form to the City Clerk prior to City Council action.
INVOCATION:
The Invocation will be provided by a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country
to be led by Cub Scout Pack #765.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT:
City Attorney will report on Closed Session.
REPORT FROM STUDENT LIAISON:
Report from Aarav Rajpara, Student
Liaison from El Toro High School.
PRESENTATIONS (Item Nos. 2 – 3)
2. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM PROGRAM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Present Certificates of Completion to the graduates of the Community Emergency Response Team Program.
3. REGENCY FIRE UPDATE
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file a presentation regarding the response to the Regency Fire.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public can submit an e-comment
to [email protected]
. E-comments will
not
be read at the meeting.
Members of the public may also provide comments in-person at the meeting. Those wishing to provide comments at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk.
November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR (Item Nos. 4 – 12)
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
4. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Said Ordinances and Resolutions which
appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON OCTOBER 17, 2023
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve as submitted.
6. CONSIDERATION OF THE 2024 CITY MEETING CALENDAR
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the 2024 City Meeting Calendar.
7. QUARTERLY TREASURER'S REPORT: JULY - SEPTEMBER 2023
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.
8. NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
RENOVATIONS: SUNDOWNER AND VINTAGE PARKS PROJECT (PW
2017-17D)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Find that Diamond Construction & Design has completed construction of the Neighborhood Park Renovations:
Sundowner and Vintage Parks Project (PW 2017-17D). 2. Approve the Notice of Completion and authorize the Mayor to execute the document on behalf of the City. 3. Authorize the City Clerk to submit Notice of Completion for recordation to the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
within fifteen days of the City Council approval, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code. 4. Authorize staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.
9. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGNS PROJECT (PW 2021-06)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Approve contract documents for
construction of the Citywide Street Name Signs Project (PW 2021-06).
2. Adopt Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24. 3. Award a contract in the amount of $816,998 to Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. 4. Reject all other bids received and authorize return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. 5. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.
10. APPROVAL OF MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR THE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST.
November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
11. FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR STREET AND TRAFFIC ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES - TASK ORDER #10 WIDENING/REALIGNMENT OF JERONIMO ROAD AT
EL TORO ROAD
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Approve the Fourth Amendment to the
Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc. for On-Call Street and Traffic Services – Task Order #10
Widening/Realignment of Jeronimo Road at El Toro Road. 2.
Authorize the
Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Fourth Amendment substantially in the form attached.
12. SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH RALPH
ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTING
SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Ralph Andersen & Associates for Human Resources Consulting Services. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk attest to, the agreement with Ralph Andersen & Associates, substantially in the form attached.
PUBLIC HEARING(S) (Item No. 13)
Public Hearings are scheduled for a time certain of 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. City Council, when considering the matter scheduled for hearing, will take the following actions: 1. Open the Public Hearing. 2. Receive staff report. 3. Accept public testimony. 4. City Council comments and questions. 5. Close the Public Hearing and take appropriate action.
13. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 6.12 – PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, REVISING SECTION
6.14.002 – PUBLIC NUISANCES DESIGNATED, AND ADDING SECTION
6.14.017 – DEFINITIONS, TO THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE (CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 17, 2023, CITY COUNCIL
MEETING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Introduce for first reading an Ordinance Entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 6.12 – PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE, REVISING SECTION 6.14.002 – PUBLIC NUISANCES DESIGNATED, AND ADDING SECTION 6.14.017 – DEFINITIONS, TO November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE, AND FINDING THE ACTION TO
BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3).
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS (Item No. 14)
The following matters are for City Council consideration/discussion/action. Members of the public may have the opportunity to address these items if they wish to do so. Please complete the Request to Speak form and give to the City Clerk.
14. AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve the Request for Proposals for Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services substantially in the form attached. 2. Authorize staff to solicit proposals.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
At this time, the City Manager may comment on agenda and non-agenda items; and report on items of interest to the City Council and community.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
At this time, City Council Members may comment on agenda or non-agenda matters. No discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, respond to statements made or questions posed by the public, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. In addition, the City Council may refer to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting or direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. No action may be taken on non-agenda matters unless authorized by law (Government Code Section 54954.2).
Council Member Pequeño:
Council Member Voigts:
Council Member Yu:
Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer:
Mayor Cirbo:
November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (949) 461-3400.
Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and agenda back-up materials can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk on the Friday prior to the City Council meeting. Copies of all Agendas, Staff Reports and Supporting Materials can also be found on the City’s website – https://www.lakeforestca.gov/129/Agendas
.
Agenda and agenda packets, if requested, will be made available in an appropriate alternative format to persons with a disability as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Copies of the agenda are provided at no cost and agenda back-up materials are available at the per page copy cost.
The City of Lake Forest mailing address is
City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California
.
Phone: (949) 461-3400. FAX (949) 461-3511
CERTIFICATION: I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review
at City Hall
on November 2, 2023.
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
November 7, 2023
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Management Services
SUBJECT:
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM PROGRAM
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Present Certificates of Completion to the graduates of the Community Emergency Response Team Program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Community Emergency Response Team (“CERT”) is a community-based volunteer effort and a component of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA"). The City of Lake Forest CERT is a recognized member of the National Community Emergency Response Team program.
On November 4, 2023, 14 Lake Forest residents completed the City's eighth CERT Basic Training program. The CERT program is about readiness, people helping people, safety, and doing the greatest good for the greatest number of people in the shortest amount of time.
The program includes eight courses and a final exercise encompassing all skills learned from each course:
•Disaster Preparedness
•CERT Organization
•Medical Operations Part I and Part II
•Fire Safety and Utility Controls
•Light Search and Rescue Operations
•Disaster Psychology
•Terrorism
The City would like to recognize the graduates from Class Eight of the CERT Basic Training program. A sample template of the certificate of completion to be presented to each CERT Basic Training graduate is affixed to this report (Attachment).
Item: 2
9 Staff recommends the City Council recognize each CERT Basic Training program graduate with a certificate of completion.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENT:
Certificate of Completion Template
Initiated By: Sharlyn De la Paz, Senior Management Analyst Submitted By: Sean McGovern, Deputy City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 2
10 5
2 6
9 7
ATTACHMENT
Item: 2
11 5
2 6
9 7
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THE LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL
HEREBY RECOGNIZES
NAME
FOR COMPLETING THE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
BASIC TRAINING
November 7, 2023
_______________________________
DOUG CIRBO
Mayor
__________________________
MARK TETTEMER
Mayor Pro Tem
__________________________
ROBERT PEQUEÑO
Council Member
__________________________
SCOTT VOIGTS
Council Member
__________________________
BENJAMIN YU
Council Member
Item: 2
12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Management Services
SUBJECT:
REGENCY FIRE UPDATE
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
RECEIVE AND FILE A PRESENTATION REGARDING THE RESPONSE TO
THE REGENCY FIRE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On Sunday, October 29, 2023, at approximately 3:20 p.m., a vegetation fire started in a landscaped area located at Regency Road and Osterman Road.
Orange County Fire Authority (“OCFA”) and Orange County Sheriff’s Department (“OCSD”) responded to the scene. The City’s Emergency Manager observed the smoke at approximately 3:43 p.m. and notified Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Communications and Marketing Division Manager, and Community Services Recreation Managers that there was a fire near the Lake Forest Sports Park. The Emergency Manager proceeded to the Emergency Operations Center (“EOC”) to monitor the event in “Management Watch” status and prepare the EOC for activation if necessary.
At 3:58 p.m., Lake Forest Sports Park staff received notification to evacuate the building and all sports fields. OCSD assisted staff and made announcements evacuating park users on the playing fields and the field houses. Staff secured the building and safely vacated the facility by 4:20 p.m. Concurrently, the Communications and Marketing Division Manager updated a recorded announcement on the City’s Emergency Hotline and an emergency alert was shared on all social media platforms. With ongoing emergency management training and clear communication among staff, the City was ready and prepared to respond if the situation became elevated and widespread evacuations were necessary.
Staff shall provide a presentation detailing the situation and the City’s response as well as the City’s next steps to secure the property impacted by the fire. Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this report detailing the City’s response to the Regency Fire that occurred on October 29, 2023.
Item: 3
13 FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Initiated By: Sharlyn De la Paz, Senior Management Analyst Submitted By: Sean McGovern, Deputy City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 3
14 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:
MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
California Government Code 36934 allows titles of ordinances and resolutions to be waived.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, MPA, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
14 Item: 4
15 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Forest held Tuesday, October 17, 2023, at the Lake Forest City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, was called to order at 5:30 p.m. with Mayor Cirbo absent.
ROLL CALL:
Council Members:
Robert Pequeño
Scott Voigts
Benjamin Yu
Mayor Pro Tem: Mark Tettemer
Mayor: Doug Cirbo (absent)
City Manager: Debra Rose
City Attorney: Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk: Lisa Berglund
CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4) Number of potential cases: 1
ACTION: Closed session was conducted.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2)
Number of potential cases: 1
ACTION: Closed session was conducted.
RECESS: City Council recessed to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business.
At 6:31 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer reconvened Open Session with Mayor Cirbo absent.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT: City Attorney Richardson had no action to report.
INVOCATION: The Invocation was provided by Pastor Aaron Hale, Calvary Chapel Foothill Ranch.
Item: 5
16 October 17, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 5 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country was led by Girl Scouts Troop #1525.
PRESENTATION: (Item No. 3)
3. NEW EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTIONS
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Deputy City Manager McGovern to introduce the City’s Homeless Outreach Coordinator, Lydia Nationalesta. No public comment was offered.
ACTION: The presentation was received and filed.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Kimberly Dorr spoke on her concerns with the Street Parkway Tree Removal and Installation Project.
Cherie Knopf spoke on her concerns with remodeling work and potential building violations at the Extended Stay America Hotel.
CONSENT CALENDAR: (Item Nos. 4 – 10)
STATEMENT READ INTO THE RECORD:
Council Member Voigts: There is a warrant on the register to the County of Orange. I am an employee of the County of Orange, but I do not work for the department that generated the warrant. Because the County of Orange is a public agency and because I do not work for the department in question, I have determined that I have a non- interest in this warrant and will vote on this item.
Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer: There are warrants on the register to the Irvine Ranch Water District. I am an employee of the Irvine Ranch Water District, but I do not work for the department that generated these warrants. Because the Irvine Ranch Water District is a public agency and because I do not work for the department in question, I have determined that I have a non-interest in these warrants and will vote on these warrants.
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 4 – 10. The motion was carried by a vote of 4/0 with Mayor Cirbo absent.
4. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appeared on the public agenda were determined to have been read by title and further reading was waived.
Item: 5
17 October 17, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 3 of 5
5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON OCTOBER 3, 2023
ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.
6. CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
ACTION: The warrant register in the amount of $3,176,365.59 was approved.
7. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR SLURRY SEAL PROJECT FOR NON-ARTERIAL STREETS, ZONE A (PW2022-05A) AND LAKE FOREST SPORTS PARK PARKING LOT (24P15)
ACTION: 1. The contract documents for construction of Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A (PW 2022-05A) and Lake Forest Sports Park Parking Lot (24P15) was approved. 2. A Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AMENDING THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 was adopted. 3. A contract in the amount of $1,401,467.50 was awarded to American Asphalt South, Inc. 4. All other bids received were rejected and return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from American Asphalt South, Inc. was authorized. 5. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with American Asphalt South, Inc.
8. NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ARBOR SEWER LATERAL (PW2019-17) AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.3
ACTION: 1. Contract Change Order No. 3 with Elegant Construction, Inc. for the Arbor Sewer Lateral Project (PW 2019-17) was approved and the City Manager was authorized to execute the document in the amount of $18,130.80.
2. Elegant Construction, Inc. was found to have completed construction of the Arbor Sewer Lateral Project (PW 2019-17). 3. The Notice of Completion was approved and the Mayor was authorized to execute the document on behalf of the City. 4. The City Clerk was authorized to submit Notice of Completion for recordation to the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County within fifteen days of City Council approval, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code. 5. Staff was authorized to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.
9. FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
ACTION: 1. The Fifth Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Item: 5
18 October 17, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 4 of 5 Agreement with Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc. was approved. 2. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Fifth Amendment substantially in the form attached.
10. CONSIDERATION OF FOURTH FUNDING PHASE FOR THE CITY'S SHOP & DINE COMMUNITY GIFT CARD PROGRAM WITH YIFTEE, INC.
ACTION: 1. The City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee, Inc. and solely include the $50 and $100 gift card options in the Shop & Dine Community Gift Card Program. 2. A Resolution Entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 was adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING: (Item No. 11)
11. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 6.12 – PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, REVISING SECTION 6.14.002 – PUBLIC NUISANCES, DESIGNATED, AND ADDING SECTION 6.14.017 –
DEFINITIONS, TO THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE
City Manager Rose introduced this item and recommended the hearing be continued to the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on November 7, 2023. Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer opened the public hearing. There were no public comments offered. Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer closed the public hearing.
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Yu, seconded by Council Member Voigts, to continue the public hearing on this item to the November 7, 2023, regularly scheduled City Council meeting. The motion was carried by a vote of 4/0 with Mayor Cirbo absent.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS: (Item Nos. 12 – 13)
12. STRATEGIC PLAN QUARTERLY UPDATE
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Deputy City Manager McGovern to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered. Council member questions were asked and answered.
ACTION: The presentation was received and filed.
13. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITION OF MULTICULTURAL EVENT TO CITY
EVENT CALENDAR
Item: 5
19 October 17, 2023 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 5 of 5 City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Management Analyst Houston to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered. Council member questions were asked and answered.
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Pequeño, seconded by Council Member Yu, to direct staff to produce a limited-scale multicultural event in Fiscal Year 2023-24 with a $10,000 budget allocation. The motion was carried by a vote of 4/0 with Mayor Cirbo absent.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: City Manager Rose had nothing further to report.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Council Member Pequeño: Council Member Pequeño reported on his attendance at a tour at the Iron Ridge Senior Affordable Housing
site. He thanked staff for all their hard work and
welcomed Lydia Nationalesta to the team.
Council Member Voigts: Council Member Voigts encouraged everyone to attend the Fall-o-Ween event at Heritage Hill
Historical Park on October 20 through 22. He reported
on his attendance at the Coffee Chat hosted by the
Chamber of Commerce.
Council Member Yu: Council Member Yu expressed his enthusiasm for the BOGO program and had nothing further to report.
Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer: Mayor Pro Tem Tettemer thanked staff and had nothing further to report.
ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 7:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
APPROVED:
LISA BERGLUND MARK TETTEMER
CITY CLERK MAYOR PRO TEM
Item: 5
20 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF THE 2024 CITY MEETING CALENDAR
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Adopt the 2024 City Meeting Calendar.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council’s practice is to adopt a City meeting calendar annually. The calendar provides the public advance notice of the upcoming schedule of meetings. The calendar also assists staff with preparation of agendas for City Council, Commission, and Audit Committee meetings. The calendar assists staff in meeting the requirements of the Brown Act, while providing appropriate time for the City Council and public to review the agenda materials. The proposed calendar includes the dates designated by Resolution as City holidays and meetings of the City Council, Planning Commission, Community Services Commission, Traffic and Parking Commission, and the Audit Committee. The Traffic and Parking Commission meetings scheduled for January and September are moved to the second Monday of those months due to the New Year’s Day and Labor Day holidays.
Staff recommends the City Council confirm the cancellation of the first City Council meeting in August as it conflicts with the National Night Out event. In the event City Council action is required on any emergent item(s), the City Manager may call a Special Meeting of the City Council or reschedule a meeting as needed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
Item: 6
21 ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed 2024 Meeting Calendar.
Initiated By: Yvette Zavaleta, Senior Office Specialist Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 6
22 ATTACHMENT
Item: 6
23 5
2 7
1 1
2024 CITY CALENDAR
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
CS = COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING CC = CITY COUNCIL MEETING AC = CITY COUNCIL AUDIT COMMITTEE TPC = TRAFFIC & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING PC = PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING H = CITY HOLIDAY SPECIAL MEETINGS MAY BE SCHEDULED, OR STANDING MEETINGS MAY BE CANCELED. REFER TO CITY WEBSITE FOR OFFICIAL NOTICES.
DECEMBER / JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
SU M TU W TH F SA SU M TU W TH F SA SU M TU W TH F SA
31 1
H
2 CC
3 CS
4 PC
5 6 1 2 3 1 2
7 8
TPC
9 10 11 12
13 4 5
TPC
6 CC
7 CS
8 PC
9 10 3 4
TPC
5 CC
6 CS
7 PC
8 9
14 15
H
16 CC
17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
21 22 23
AC
24 25 26
27 18 19
H
20 CC
21 22 23
24 17 18 19
CC
20 21 22
23 2428 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29
31 25 26 27 28 29 30
APRIL MAY JUNE
SU M TU W TH F SA SU M TU W TH F SA SU M TU W TH F SA
1 TPC
2 CC
3 CS
4 PC
5 6 1 2 3
4 1
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6
TPC
7 CC
8 CS
9 PC
10 11 2 3
TPC
4 CC
5 CS
6 PC
7 8
14 15 16
CC
17 18 19
20 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 21 22 23
AC
24 25 26 27 19 20 21
CC
22 23 24 25 16 17 18
CC
19 20 21 22
2328 29 30 26 27
H
28 29 30 31
30 24 25 26 27 28
29 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
SU M TU W TH F SA SU M TU W TH F SA SU M TU W TH F SA
1 TPC
2 CC
3 CS
4 H
5 6 1 2 3 1 2
H
3 CC
4 CS
5 PC
6 7
7 8 9 10 11
PC
12 13 4 5
TPC
6 7
CS
8 PC
9 10 8 9
TPC
10 11 12 13 14
14 15 16
CC
17 18 19 20 11 12 13
AC
14 15 16 17 15 16 17
CC
18 19 20
21 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 18 19 20
CC
21 22 23
24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30
OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
SU M TU W TH F S SU M TU W TH F S SU M TU W TH F S
1 CC
2 CS
3 PC
4 5 1
2 1 2
TPC
3 CC
4 CS
5 PC
6 7
6 7
TPC
8 9 10 11 12 3 4
TPC
5 CC
6 CS
7 PC
8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 13 14 15
CC
16 17 18
19 10 11
H
12 13 14 15
16 15 16 17
CC
18 19 20 21
20 21 22
AC
23 24 25 26 17 18 19
CC
20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25
H
26 27
28 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28
H
29 H
30 29 30 31
Item: 6
24 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/07/2023
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT:
QUARTERLY TREASURER'S REPORT - QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2023
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Receive and file.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Treasurer's Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, is attached.
There are no exceptions to the Investment Policy. Total cash and investments equal $193.4 million for the period. Quarterly reports are presented to the City Council to keep the City Council apprised of the status of the City’s investment holdings and demonstrate compliance with the City’s Investment Policy. The attached report presents the status of the City’s investment portfolio for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.
The City contracts with Chandler Asset Management to provide investment management services.
Investment Portfolio
The City’s balances consist of the following:
Type June 30, 2023 September 30, 2023
Chandler Asset Management Portfolio* 139.8 140.8
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 0.1 0.5
California Asset Management Program (CAMP) 44.7 45.4
Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) 0.2 0.1
Federated Government Obligations Fund 0.0 0.0
Operating Bank Balance – US Bank 9.8 7.1
Total 194.6 193.9
*The balances are shown as book value and can be viewed on page 36 in the Holdings Report section of the attached Quarterly Treasurer’s Report.
Item: 7
25 The attached Quarterly report attests to our alignment with the Statement of Investment Policy, demonstrating full compliance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Quarterly Treasurer's Report
Initiated By: Amy Lewis, Assistant Director of Finance
Submitted By: Kevin Shirah, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 7
26 ATTACHMENT
Item: 7
27 City of Lake Forest Investment Statement of Compliance Quarter Ending September 30, 2023
1. I hereby certify that the investments are in compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy approved by the City Council on April 18, 2023.
2. Although any investment is impacted by market conditions, the current investments
are structure to reduce the impact of market conditions.
3. The market values for the investments are provided by the City’s investment management service,
Chandler Asset Management, US Bank,
Local Agency Investment Fund, California Asset Management Program and Orange County Investment Pool.
4. The City has the ability to meet its budgeted expenditures for the next six months.
___
____________________________
Kevin R. Shirah
Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Item: 7
28 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 800.317.4747 | www.chandlerasset.com
INVESTMENT REPORT
Period Ending September 30, 2023
City of Lake Forest
Item: 7
29 SECTION 1 Economic Update
SECTION 2 Account Profile
SECTION 3 Consolidated Information
SECTION 4 Portfolio Holdings
SECTION 5 Transactions
Table of Contents As of September 30, 2023
1 Item: 7
30 SECTION |
Section 1 |
Economic Update
2 Item: 7
31 Economic Update
▪
▪
▪
Recent economic data continues to suggest positive but below trend growth this year. Labor markets remain solid, and the U.S. consumer has demonstrated resiliency. Inflationary trends are subsiding, but core levels remain well above the Fed’s target. Given the cumulative effects of restrictive monetary policy and tighter financial conditions, we believe the economy will gradually soften and the Fed will remain data dependent as they tread cautiously going forward.
As anticipated at the September meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to maintain the target Federal Funds at the range of 5.25 - 5.50%. The Fed’s Summaryof Economic Projections (SEP) also revealed expectations of higher economic growth, reduced unemployment, and a gradual easing of inflation compared to earlier forecasts. The Fed is continuing to focus on achieving price stability and bringing inflation down toward their2% policy objective, while leaving the option open for the possibility of additional rate hikes in the future if needed.
The yield curve remained inverted in September. The 2-year Treasury yield increased 18 basis points to 5.05%, the 5-year Treasury yield rose 36 basis points to 4.61%, and the 10-year Treasury yield increased 46 basis points to 4.57%. The inversion between the 2-year Treasury yield and 10-year Treasury yield narrowed to -48 basis points at September month-end versus -76 basis points at August month- end. The spread between the 2-year Treasury and 10-year Treasury yield one year ago was -45 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries narrowed to -88 basis points in September from -134 basis points in August. The shape of the yield curve indicates that the probability of recession persists.
3 Item: 7
32 Employment
-400
-200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000MOM Change In Thousands (000's)
Nonfarm Payroll (000's)
Non-farm Payroll (000's)
3 month average (000's)
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate (U6)
Unemployment Rate (U3)
Rate (%)
The U.S. economy added 336,000 jobsin September, exceeding consensus expectations of 170,000, and the last two months were revised upward by 119,000 jobs. The largest gains came from leisure and hospitality, bringing restaurant and bar employment back in-line with pre-pandemic levels. The pace of job growth has picked up recently, with the three-month moving average payrollsat 266,000 and the six- month moving average at 234,000. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.8%, and the labor participation rate was consistent with last month’s report at 62.8%. The U-6 underemployment rate, which includes those who are marginally attached to the labor force and employed part time for economic reasons declined slightly to 7.0% from the prior month at 7.1%. Average hourly earnings declined to
4.2% year-over-year in September from 4.3% in August. Employment remains strong by historical standards.
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor 4 Item: 7
33 Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey
0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Job Openings
Recession
Historical Average
In Thousands (000's)
The Labor Department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) unexpectedly increased to 9.61 million in August from a revised
8.92 million in July. The level significantly surpassed the survey of Bloomberg economists’ expectations of 8.82 million and reflects approximately 1.5 job openings per available worker. Although JOLTS was an upside surprise, the quits rate remained at a benign 2.3% for August, well below its 3.0% peak in April 2022. Fewer quits can imply that workers are less confident in their ability to find another job in the current market. The current level of job openings remains elevated from a historical perspective.
Source: US Department of Labor
5 Item: 7
34 Inflation
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
CPI YOY % Change
Core CPI YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)
PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change
PCE Core Deflator YOY % Change
Fed Target
YOY (%) Change
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased in September by 0.4% month-over-month and 3.7% year-over-year, slightly higher than expected. Gains in shelter and energy costs accounted for a large part of the monthly increase. The Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, was up 0.3% month-over-month and 4.1% year-over-year, decelerating from 4.3% last month. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index rose 0.4% month-over-month and 3.5% year-over-year in August, up from a 3.4% year-over-year gain in July. Core PCE, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, increased just 0.1% month-over-month and 3.9% year-over-yearin August, down from a 4.3% increase in July. Personal income and spending remained relatively healthy, but the personal savings rate continued its declining trend to 3.9% in August from 4.1% in July. Inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target.
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce 6 Item: 7
35 Consumer
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Retail Sales YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
Retail Sales rose 0.6% in August, exceeding the consensus forecast. Sales of motor vehicles and higher gasoline prices drove greater than expected gains. However, Control Group Sales, which are used to calculate gross domestic product and exclude food services, auto dealers, building materials stores and gasoline stations, rose just 0.1%, the smallest advance in five months. On a year-over-year basis, retail sales growth decelerated to a 2.5% gain in August versus a downwardly revised 2.6% gain in July. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index dropped more than expected to 103.0 in September froman upwardly revised 108.7 in August, primarily due to significantly weaker future expectations for employment. While the consumer has been resilient, dwindling excess savings, rising credit card balances, and the resumption of student loan payments pose potential headwinds to future economic growth. 80 90
100
110
120
130
140
Index Level
Consumer Confidence
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board 7 Item: 7
36 Leading Indicators of Economic Activity
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
Recession
YOY (%) Change
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00 0.25
0.50 0.75
1.00 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)
Recession
3 Month Average
The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI) remained in negative territory for the seventeenth consecutive month at -0.4% in August due to weak new orders, deteriorating consumer expectations of business conditions, high interest rates, and tight credit conditions. The index declined 7.6% year-over-year. The consistent decline month-over-month continues to signal future contraction in the economy. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) surprised to the downside at -0.16 in August from downwardly revised 0.07in July. On a 3-month moving average basis, the CFNAI remained negative at -0.14 in August, indicating a rate of growth below the historical average trend.
Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 8 Item: 7
37 Housing
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400In Thousands of Units
Annualized Housing Starts
Multi Family Housing Starts
Single Family Housing Starts
Starts of new homes slowed -11.3% to 1.283 million units at a seasonally adjusted annual rate in August after a downward revision to
1.447 million units in July. The slower starts came from both a 4.3% decline in single-family home starts and 26.3% decline in multi-family homes, continuing the reversal of strong multi-family homebuilding in the second half of 2022 and early 2023. Total starts of new homes are down 14.8% year-over-year. Accordingto Freddie Mac, average 30-year fixed rate mortgage rates increased to 7.35% as of September 28th. Rising mortgage rates are prompting homebuilders to offer incentives to attract buyers and has caused homebuilder sentiment to reach a five-month low. Accordingto the Case-Shiller 20-City Home Price Index, housing prices rose 0.1% year-over-year in July, improving from a 1.2% decline in June. Tight inventories and higher mortgage rates continue to impact affordability.
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P
-20.0%
-16.0%
-12.0%
-8.0%
-4.0%
0.0%
4.0%
8.0%
12.0%
16.0%
20.0%
24.0%
S&P/Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index
Recession
YOY (%) Change
9 Item: 7
38 Survey Based Measures
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Surveys
ISM Manufacturing ISM Services
EXPANDING
CONTRACTING
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing index remained in contraction territoryat 49.0 in September, up from 47.6 in August. This is the eleventh consecutive month of readings below 50.0, which is indicative of contraction in the manufacturing sector.
However, this is the highest reading since November 2022, as both employment and new orders improved, while prices paid subsided.
The ISM Services Index eased to 53.6 in September from the six-month high of 54.5 in August. The prices paid component continued to grow primarily due to high labor costs and an uptick in energy costs, but new orders reflected a significant slowdown.
Source: Institute for Supply Management
10 Item: 7
39 Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Components of GDP 9/22 12/22 3/23 6/23
1.1% 0.8% 2.5% 0.6%
-1.5% 0.6% -1.7% 0.9%
2.6% 0.3% 0.6% 0.0%
0.1% 0.6% 0.3% 0.1%
0.4% 0.3% 0.5% 0.5%
2.7% 2.6% 2.3% 2.1%
State and Local (Consumption and Gross
Investment)
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Gross Private Domestic Investment
Net Exports and Imports
Federal Government Expenditures
Total
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP QOQ % Change
GDP YOY % Change
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce According to the third estimate, second quarter annualized GDP growth remained unchanged at 2.1%. A material decline in consumer spending was offset by improvement in business investment. Historically low unemployment, wage growth and savings built up during the pandemic has supported consumer spending at a level to keep economic growth intact, but there are signs the consumer is beginning to show signs of stress. The consensus estimate calls for 3.0% growth for the third quarter and 2.1% for the full year 2023. 11 Item: 7
40 Federal Reserve
Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg
0 1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets
Recession
In $ millions
At the September meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimouslyto leave the Federal Funds rate unchanged at a target range of 5.25 - 5.50%. Nonetheless, the Fed conveyed a consensus view that another rate hike is possible later in the year, along with its commitmentto keeping rates at their current level until inflation subsides closer to its 2% target, endorsing a data-dependent 'higher-for- longer' strategy. The Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) also revealed expectations of higher economic growth, reduced unemployment, and a gradual easing of inflation compared to earlier forecasts. We believe the resiliency of future economic data will determine if the Federal Reserve can stay on hold for or will tighten policy further to curb inflation. Since the Federal Reserve began its Quantitative Tightening campaign in June 2022, securities holdings have declined by over $1 trillion to $8.024T.
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
Effective Federal Funds Rate
Recession
Yield (%)
12 Item: 7
41 Bond Yields
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
US Treasury Note Yields
2-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Yield (%)
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
US Treasury Yield Curve
Sep-23
Jun-23
Sep-22
Yield (%)
At the end of September, the 2-year Treasury yield was 77 basis points higher, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was about 74 basis points higher, year-over-year. The inversion between the 2-year Treasury yield and 10-year Treasury yield narrowed to -48 basis points at September month-end versus -76 basis points at August month-end. The average historical spread (since 2003) is about +130 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries narrowed to -88 basis points in September from -134 basis points in August. The shape of the yield curve indicates that the probability of recession persists. 13 Item: 7
42 Section 2|SECTION |
Section 2 |
Account Profile
14 Item: 7
43 Objectives
Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective
The performance objective for the portfolio is to earn a total rate of return through a market cycle that is equal to or above the return on the benchmark index.
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives for the City of Lake Forest, in order of priority, are to provide safety to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio, provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and earn a market rate of return consistent with the investment program.
Strategy
In order to achieve this objective, the portfolio invests in high-quality fixed income securities that comply with the investment policy and all regulations governing the funds.
As of September 30, 2023
15 Item: 7
44 Compliance As of September 30, 2023
Category Standard Comment
U.S. Treasuries No limit; 5 years max maturity Complies Federal Agencies 30% max per Agency/GSE issuer; 20% max agency callable securities; 5 years max maturity Complies Supranational Obligations "AA" rating category or higher by a NRSRO; 30% max; 10% max per issuer; 5 years max maturity; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by IBRD, IFC, or IADB Complies Municipal Securities (CA, Other States) "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% max; 5% max per issuer; 5 years max maturity Complies Corporate Medium Term Notes
"A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% max; 5% max per issuer; 5 years max maturity; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S.
Complies
Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed,
Mortgage Pass-Through Securities, and
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
"AA" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 20% max (combined); 5% max per Asset-Backed or Commercial Mortgage security issuer; 5 years max maturity; From issuers not defined in US Treasuries and Federal Agencies sections of the Authorized Investments section of the policy
Complies
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCD)
The amount of NCD insured up to the FDIC limit does not require any credit ratings; Any amount above FDIC insured limit must be issued by institutions with "A-1" short-term debt rating or better by a NRSRO; or "A" long-term rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% max (combined with CDARS); 5% max per issuer; 5 years max maturity Complies
Certificate of Deposit Placement Service
(CDARS) 30% max (combination of Certificates of Deposit, including CDARS); 5 years max maturity Complies Time Deposits (Non-negotiable CD/TD) 20% max combined FDIC & Collateralized CD/TD; 5 years max maturity Complies Collateralized Bank Deposits Deposits with financial institutions will be collateralized with pledged securities per California Government Code Complies Banker’s Acceptances A-1 short-term debt rated or better by a NRSRO; or "A" long-term debt rating category or better by a NRSRO; 40% max; 5% max per issuer; 180 days max maturity Complies
Commercial Paper
25% max; 40% max, if the City’s investment assets under management are greater than $100 million (under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026); 5% max per issuer; 270 days maturity; 10% max of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer; Issued by an entity that meets all of the following conditions in either (a) or (b): a. (i) organized and operating within the U.S. with assets > $500 million; (ii) "A-1" rated or better by a NRSRO; (iii) "A" rating or better by a NRSRO, if issuer has debt obligations; b. (i) organized within the U.S. as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company; (ii) must have program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond; (iii) rated "A-1" or better by a NRSRO Complies
Money Market Mutual Funds
20% max combined Money Market Mutual Funds and Mutual Funds; 20% max per MMMF; Meet either of the following criteria: (i) Attained highest rating by two NRSROs; or (ii) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from SEC registration with > 5 years experience managing MMMF with AUM >$500 million Complies
Lake Forest Consolidated
This portfolio is a consolidation of assets managed by Chandler Asset Management and assets managed internally by Client. Chandler relies on Client to provide accurate information for reporting assets and producing this compliance statement. 16 Item: 7
45 Compliance As of September 30, 2023
Category Standard Comment
Mutual Funds
20% max combined Money Market Mutual Funds and Mutual Funds; 10% max per MF; Meet either of the following criteria: (i) Attained highest rating by two NRSROs; or (ii) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from SEC registration with > 5 years experience investing in securities authorized by CGC & with AUM >$500 million Complies
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Maximum amount permitted by LAIF; Not used by investment adviser Complies Local Government Investment Pools No issuer limitation for LGIP; Not used by investment adviser Complies Repurchase Agreements 1 year max maturity; 102% Collateralized; Not used by investment adviser Complies Max Per Issuer 5% max per issuer unless otherwise specified in the policy Complies Duration Approximately equal to the duration (typically +/-20%) of market benchmark Complies Maximum Maturity 5 years max maturity from date of trade settlement, unless the Governing Body has by resolution granted authority to make such an investment Complies
Lake Forest Consolidated
This portfolio is a consolidation of assets managed by Chandler Asset Management and assets managed internally by Client. Chandler relies on Client to provide accurate information for reporting assets and producing this compliance statement. 17 Item: 7
46 Portfolio Characteristics
Lake Forest Operating Reserve
09/30/23 06/30/23
Benchmark* Portfolio Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.65 2.94 2.10
Average Modified Duration 2.49 2.43 1.77
Average Purchase Yield n/a 4.83% 4.66%
Average Market Yield 4.98% 5.27% 4.80%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+/Aa1 AA+/Aa1
Total Market Value 140,290,697 139,581,730
*ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index
**Benchmark is a blended rating of S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively.
As of September 30, 2023
18 Item: 7
47 Lake Forest Operating Reserve
Sector Distribution
ABS
9.5%
Agency
19.4%
CMO
9.1%
Corporate
24.6%
Money Market
Fund
0.1%
US Treasury
34.4%
Supranational
2.9%
September 30, 2023 June 30, 2023
ABS
6.1%
Agency
11.9%
CMO
6.0%
Corporate
16.0%Money Market
Fund
37.9%
US Treasury
22.2%
As of September 30, 2023
19 Item: 7
48 AAA AA A <A NR
09/30/23 17.0% 54.3% 16.8% 0.0% 11.9%
06/30/23 42.4% 37.0% 10.6% 0.0% 10.0%
Source: S&P Ratings
September 30, 2023 vs. June 30, 2023
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
AAA AA A <A NR
09/30/23 06/30/23
Quality Distribution
Lake Forest Operating Reserve
As of September 30, 2023
20 Item: 7
49 0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ September 30, 2023 June 30, 2023
September 30, 2023 vs. June 30, 2023
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ 09/30/23 0.1% 2.5% 7.3% 31.7% 24.6% 17.9% 15.8% 0.0%
06/30/23 37.9% 0.0% 2.4% 16.5% 18.2% 10.3% 14.7% 0.0%
Lake Forest Operating Reserve
Duration Distribution As of September 30, 2023
21 Item: 7
50 Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio
Government of United States US Treasury 34.37%
Federal Farm Credit Bank Agency 12.40%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp CMO 9.13%
Federal Home Loan Bank Agency 6.98%
Inter-American Dev Bank Supranational 1.99%
JP Morgan ABS ABS 1.52%
Deere & Company Corporate 1.42%
Toronto Dominion Holdings Corporate 1.42%
Northwestern Mutual Glbl Corporate 1.42%
New York Life Global Funding Corporate 1.42%
Royal Bank of Canada Corporate 1.41%
JP Morgan Chase & Co Corporate 1.40%
Bank of America Corp Corporate 1.39%
Morgan Stanley Corporate 1.38%
Prologis Trust Corporate 1.35%
John Deere ABS ABS 1.16%
Amazon.com Inc Corporate 1.06%
Honda ABS ABS 1.06%
Toyota ABS ABS 1.05%
American Express ABS ABS 1.04%
Wal-Mart Stores Corporate 1.04%
Bank of America Credit Card Trust ABS 1.03%
GM Financial Securitized Term Auto Trust ABS 0.92%
International Finance Corp Supranational 0.91%
BMW ABS ABS 0.91%
Verizon Master Trust ABS 0.79%
Guardian Life Global Funding Corporate 0.73%
United Health Group Inc Corporate 0.72%
Metlife Inc Corporate 0.72%
Bank of Montreal Chicago Corporate 0.72%
State Street Bank Corporate 0.72%
Realty Income Corp Corporate 0.71%
Mass Mutual Insurance Corporate 0.71%
Bank of New York Corporate 0.71%
Florida Power and Light Corporate 0.70%
National Rural Utilities Corporate 0.70%
Prudential Financial Inc Corporate 0.70%
Toyota Motor Corp Corporate 0.69%
Issuers
Lake Forest Operating Reserve – Account #11083
As of September 30, 2023
22 Item: 7
51 Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio
Public Service El & Gas Corporate 0.68%
Duke Energy Field Services Corporate 0.67%
Federated Govt Obligation Money Market Fund Money Market Fund 0.13% TOTAL 100.00%
Issuers
Lake Forest Operating Reserve – Account #11083
As of September 30, 2023
23 Item: 7
52 Portfolio Characteristics
Lake Forest Reporting
09/30/23
Portfolio
06/30/23
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.00 0.00
Modified Duration 0.00 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 5.48% 5.19%
Average Market Yield 5.48% 5.19%
Average Quality* AAA/NR AAA/NR
Total Market Value 46,005,858 45,096,808
*Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s, respectively.
As of September 30, 2023
24 Item: 7
53 Lake Forest Reporting
Sector Distribution
LAIF
1.1%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
98.9%
September 30, 2023 June 30, 2023
LAIF
0.3%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
99.7%
As of September 30, 2023
25 Item: 7
54 Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio
CAMP Local Gov Investment Pool 98.59%
Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF 1.13%
Orange County Investment Pool Local Gov Investment Pool 0.28% TOTAL 100.00%
Issuers
Lake Forest Reporting – Account #11084
As of September 30, 2023
26 Item: 7
55 SECTION |
Section 3 |
Consolidated Information
27 Item: 7
56 Portfolio Characteristics
Lake Forest Consolidated
09/30/23 06/30/23
Portfolio Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.22 1.59
Modified Duration 1.83 1.34
Average Purchase Yield 4.99% 4.79%
Average Market Yield 5.32% 4.90%
Average Quality* AA+/Aa1 AAA/Aa1
Total Market Value 186,296,555 184,678,538
* Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively.
As of September 30, 2023
28 Item: 7
57 Lake Forest Consolidated
Sector Distribution
ABS
7.1%
Agency
14.6%
CMO
6.9%
Corporate
18.5%LAIF
0.3%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
24.4%
Money Market
Fund
0.1%
US Treasury
25.9%
Supranational
2.2%
September 30, 2023 June 30, 2023
ABS
4.6%
Agency
9.0%
CMO
4.6%
Corporate
12.1%
LAIF
0.1%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
24.3%
Money Market
Fund
28.6%
US Treasury
16.8%
As of September 30, 2023
29 Item: 7
58 SECTION |
Section 4 |
Portfolio Holdings
30 Item: 7
59 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
47800AAC4 John Deere Owner Trust 2022-B A3
3.740% Due 02/16/2027
1,175,000.00 06/13/2023
5.34%
1,145,533.21
1,148,793.88
97.34 5.85%
1,143,777.90
1,953.11
0.82%
(5,015.98)
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.38 1.28
43815JAC7 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2023-1 A3
5.040% Due 04/21/2027
1,500,000.00 Various
5.21%
1,496,640.63
1,496,932.16
98.99 5.69%
1,484,784.00
2,100.00
1.06%
(12,148.16)
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.56 1.72
02582JJT8 American Express Credit Trust 2022-2 A
3.390% Due 05/17/2027
930,000.00 06/12/2023
5.09%
901,954.69
906,315.52
96.51 5.72%
897,514.17
1,401.20
0.64%
(8,801.35)
NR / AAA
AAA
3.63 1.53
161571HS6 Chase Issuance Trust 22-A1 A
3.970% Due 09/15/2027
1,500,000.00 06/05/2023
4.85%
1,473,046.88
1,476,804.77
97.15 5.58%
1,457,284.50
2,646.67
1.04%
(19,520.27)
NR / AAA
AAA
3.96 1.82
89239HAD0 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 20222-D A3
5.300% Due 09/15/2027
1,480,000.00 06/12/2023
5.07%
1,488,093.75
1,487,266.15
99.35 5.74%
1,470,411.08
3,486.22
1.05%
(16,855.07)
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.96 1.72
05522RDE5 Bank of America Credit Card Tr 2022-A1 A1
3.530% Due 11/15/2027
1,500,000.00 06/06/2023
5.03%
1,458,222.66
1,464,732.68
96.64 5.68%
1,449,538.50
2,353.33
1.03%
(15,194.18)
Aaa / NR
AAA
4.13 1.60
362583AD8 GM Auto Receivable Trust 2023-2 A3
4.470% Due 02/16/2028
1,000,000.00 07/12/2023
5.17%
986,328.13
987,284.80
97.76 5.76%
977,637.01
1,862.50
0.70%
(9,647.79)
Aaa / AAA
NR
4.38 1.80
05592XAD2 BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A A3
5.470% Due 02/25/2028
1,275,000.00 Various
5.24%
1,280,732.52
1,280,381.83
99.74 5.67%
1,271,646.75
1,162.38
0.91%
(8,735.08)
NR / AAA
AAA
4.41 1.88
477920AC6 John Deere Owner Trust 2023-B A3
5.180% Due 03/15/2028
485,000.00 06/21/2023
5.24%
484,919.10
484,924.89
99.12 5.62%
480,746.55
1,116.58
0.34%
(4,178.34)
Aaa / NR
AAA
4.46 2.27
92348KBL6 Verizon Master Trust 2023-2 A
4.890% Due 04/13/2028
1,115,000.00 07/25/2023
5.39%
1,103,937.11
1,104,589.03
98.72 5.78%
1,100,719.08
1,666.00
0.79%
(3,869.95)
NR / AAA
AAA
4.54 1.95
02582JJZ4 American Express Credit Trust 2023-1 A
4.870% Due 05/15/2028
570,000.00 06/07/2023
4.92%
569,949.44
569,954.61
98.75 5.44%
562,888.68
1,233.73
0.40%
(7,065.93)
NR / AAA
AAA
4.63 2.39
36267KAD9 GM Financial Securitized Term 2023-3 A3
5.450% Due 06/16/2028
315,000.00 07/11/2023
5.51%
314,987.84
314,988.54
99.84 5.59%
314,486.25
715.31
0.22%
(502.29)
Aaa / AAA
NR
4.72 2.06
161571HT4 Chase Issuance Trust 23-A1 A
5.160% Due 09/15/2028
680,000.00 09/07/2023
5.23%
679,811.50
679,814.25
99.63 5.35%
677,496.24
1,559.47
0.48%
(2,318.01)
NR / AAA
AAA
4.96 2.66
TOTAL ABS 13,525,000.00 5.15%
13,384,157.46
13,402,783.11 5.68%
13,288,930.71
23,256.50
9.49%
(113,852.40)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
4.10 1.81
Agency
3130AV5N8 FHLB Note
5.000% Due 12/13/2024
3,500,000.00 06/28/2023
5.13%
3,493,735.00
3,494,830.20
99.79 5.17%
3,492,720.00
52,500.00
2.53%
(2,110.20)
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.21 1.14
3130AWER7 FHLB Note
4.625% Due 06/06/2025
2,700,000.00 06/09/2023
4.67%
2,697,759.00
2,698,102.10
99.18 5.14%
2,677,770.90
37,809.38
1.94%
(20,331.20)
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.68 1.58
As of September 30, 2023
31 Item: 7
60 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3130AWLY4 FHLB Note
5.125% Due 06/13/2025
3,500,000.00 07/18/2023
4.82%
3,519,110.00
3,517,075.27
99.82 5.23%
3,493,756.00
40,359.38
2.52%
(23,319.27)
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.70 1.59
3133EPRS6 FFCB Note
4.875% Due 07/28/2025
3,500,000.00 07/25/2023
5.00%
3,492,020.00
3,492,729.58
99.49 5.16%
3,482,283.00
29,859.38
2.50%
(10,446.58)
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.83 1.71
3133EPMB8 FFCB Note
4.125% Due 12/08/2025
3,500,000.00 06/08/2023
4.39%
3,478,545.00
3,481,223.94
97.97 5.12%
3,428,876.50
45,317.71
2.48%
(52,347.44)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.19 2.04
3133EPPR0 FFCB Note
4.625% Due 04/10/2026
3,500,000.00 07/25/2023
4.74%
3,490,375.00
3,491,027.05
99.13 4.99%
3,469,641.00
36,421.88
2.50%
(21,386.05)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.53 2.33
3133EPNG6 FFCB Note
4.375% Due 06/23/2026
3,500,000.00 06/20/2023
4.39%
3,498,145.00
3,498,314.25
98.69 4.89%
3,454,066.00
41,684.03
2.49%
(44,248.25)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.73 2.51
3133EPNH4 FFCB Note
3.875% Due 06/21/2028
3,500,000.00 06/21/2023
4.06%
3,470,831.00
3,472,429.30
96.13 4.80%
3,364,413.50
37,673.61
2.43%
(108,015.80)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
4.73 4.21
TOTAL Agency 27,200,000.00 4.65%
27,140,520.00
27,145,731.69 5.06%
26,863,526.90
321,625.37
19.38%
(282,204.79)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.33 2.14
CMO
3137BVZ82 FHLMC K063
3.430% Due 01/25/2027
2,500,000.00 06/06/2023
4.47%
2,415,429.69
2,422,700.44
94.62 5.26%
2,365,552.50
7,145.83
1.69%
(57,147.94)
NR / NR
AAA
3.32 2.93
3137FBU79 FHLMC K069 A2
3.187% Due 09/25/2027
2,345,000.00 06/30/2023
5.32%
2,218,406.64
2,225,549.07
92.91 5.22%
2,178,641.01
6,227.93
1.56%
(46,908.06)
NR / AAA
NR
3.99 3.53
3137FCLD4 FHLMC K071 A2
3.286% Due 11/25/2027
1,300,000.00 06/07/2023
4.41%
1,240,281.25
1,244,491.95
92.95 5.19%
1,208,404.60
3,559.83
0.86%
(36,087.35)
NR / NR
AAA
4.16 3.74
3137FETN0 FHLMC K073 A2
3.350% Due 01/25/2028
2,500,000.00 06/06/2023
4.35%
2,403,027.34
2,409,564.82
93.02 5.19%
2,325,620.00
1,395.83
1.66%
(83,944.82)
NR / NR
AAA
4.32 3.83
3137F4D41 FHLMC K074 A2
3.600% Due 01/25/2028
2,500,000.00 07/25/2023
5.78%
2,386,035.15
2,390,546.55
93.94 5.19%
2,348,510.00
1,500.00
1.68%
(42,036.55)
NR / NR
AAA
4.32 3.82
3137FGR31 FHLMC K078 A2
3.854% Due 06/25/2028
2,500,000.00 06/22/2023
4.42%
2,443,261.72
2,446,246.31
94.63 5.16%
2,365,625.00
1,605.83
1.69%
(80,621.31)
NR / NR
AAA
4.74 4.10
TOTAL CMO 13,645,000.00 4.81%
13,106,441.79
13,139,099.14 5.20%
12,792,353.11
21,435.25
9.13%
(346,746.03)
NR / AAA
AAA
4.14 3.65
Corporate
06368LGU4 Bank of Montreal Note
5.200% Due 12/12/2024
1,000,000.00 06/20/2023
5.62%
994,080.00
995,189.31
99.13 5.95%
991,308.00
15,744.44
0.72%
(3,881.31)
A2 / A-
AA-
1.20 1.13
74153WCR8 Pricoa Global Funding Note
4.200% Due 08/28/2025
1,000,000.00 07/18/2023
5.37%
976,970.00
979,153.36
97.20 5.76%
972,018.00
3,850.00
0.70%
(7,135.36)
Aa3 / AA-
AA-
1.91 1.80
As of September 30, 2023
32 Item: 7
61 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
89115A2K7 Toronto-Dominion Bank Note
5.103% Due 01/09/2026
1,000,000.00 06/16/2023
5.23%
996,950.00
997,283.44
98.66 5.73%
986,618.00
11,623.50
0.71%
(10,665.44)
A1 / A
AA-
2.28 2.09
78016FZT4 Royal Bank of Canada Note
4.875% Due 01/12/2026
1,000,000.00 06/16/2023
5.26%
990,910.00
991,900.58
98.14 5.75%
981,400.00
10,697.92
0.71%
(10,500.58)
A1 / A
AA-
2.29 2.11
63743HFH0 National Rural Utility Corp Callable Note Cont. 2/13/2026
4.450% Due 03/13/2026
1,000,000.00 06/08/2023
4.73%
992,710.00
993,515.16
97.68 5.47%
976,766.00
2,225.00
0.70%
(16,749.16)
A2 / A-
A
2.45 2.28
64952WFB4 New York Life Global Note
4.700% Due 04/02/2026
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
4.89%
994,890.00
995,465.50
97.96 5.58%
979,569.00
22,977.78
0.71%
(15,896.50)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.51 2.27
66815L2L2 Northwestern Mutual Glbl Note
4.700% Due 04/06/2026
1,000,000.00 07/06/2023
5.50%
979,860.00
981,529.95
97.96 5.58%
979,645.00
22,847.22
0.71%
(1,884.95)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.52 2.28
57629W6F2 Mass Mutual Global funding Note
4.500% Due 04/10/2026
1,000,000.00 06/20/2023
5.12%
983,900.00
985,489.54
97.64 5.51%
976,358.00
21,125.00
0.71%
(9,131.54)
Aa3 / AA+
AA+
2.53 2.30
46647PCZ7 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note Cont 4/26/2025
4.080% Due 04/26/2026
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
5.76%
978,990.00
981,302.30
97.05 6.08%
970,465.00
17,566.67
0.70%
(10,837.30)
A1 / A-
AA-
2.57 1.47
857477CB7 State Street Bank Callable Note Cont 5/18/2023
5.104% Due 05/18/2026
1,000,000.00 07/10/2023
5.84%
993,480.00
993,987.32
98.74 5.92%
987,362.00
18,856.44
0.72%
(6,625.32)
A1 / A
AA-
2.63 1.51
756109BF0 Realty Income Corp Callable Note Cont 03/01/2026
4.875% Due 06/01/2026
1,000,000.00 06/07/2023
5.20%
991,130.00
992,059.39
98.14 5.63%
981,351.00
16,250.00
0.71%
(10,708.39)
A3 / A-
NR
2.67 2.43
24422EWX3 John Deere Capital Corp Note
4.750% Due 06/08/2026
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
4.72%
1,000,940.00
1,000,841.37
98.66 5.29%
986,569.00
14,909.72
0.71%
(14,272.37)
A2 / A
A+
2.69 2.45
58989V2F0 Met Tower Global Funding Note
5.400% Due 06/20/2026
1,000,000.00 06/12/2023
5.38%
1,000,440.00
1,000,398.65
99.23 5.71%
992,303.00
15,150.00
0.72%
(8,095.65)
Aa3 / AA-
AA-
2.72 2.46
61747YET8 Morgan Stanley Callable Note Cont 7/17/2025
4.679% Due 07/17/2026
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
5.78%
989,810.00
990,850.53
97.42 6.21%
974,171.00
9,617.94
0.70%
(16,679.53)
A1 / A-
A+
2.80 1.68
06051GLA5 Bank of America Corp Callable Note Cont 7/22/2025
4.827% Due 07/22/2026
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
5.89%
990,260.00
991,250.22
97.49 6.31%
974,889.00
9,251.75
0.70%
(16,361.22)
A1 / A-
AA-
2.81 1.69
26444HAC5 Duke Energy Florida LLC Callable Note Cont 10/15/2026
3.200% Due 01/15/2027
1,000,000.00 06/13/2023
4.65%
952,650.00
956,553.66
93.68 5.32%
936,812.00
6,755.56
0.67%
(19,741.66)
A1 / A
NR
3.30 3.04
74340XBN0 Prologis LP Callable Note Cont 2/15/2027
2.125% Due 04/15/2027
1,000,000.00 06/07/2023
4.78%
907,480.00
914,981.62
89.37 5.47%
893,726.00
9,798.61
0.64%
(21,255.62)
A3 / A
NR
3.54 3.30
As of September 30, 2023
33 Item: 7
62 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
06406RBQ9 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note Cont 4/26/2026
4.947% Due 04/26/2027
1,000,000.00 06/08/2023
5.48%
993,950.00
994,424.93
97.61 5.96%
976,085.00
21,299.58
0.71%
(18,339.93)
A1 / A
AA-
3.57 2.32
89236TKJ3 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
4.550% Due 09/20/2027
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
4.63%
996,860.00
997,092.59
97.28 5.32%
972,803.00
1,390.28
0.69%
(24,289.59)
A1 / A+
A+
3.98 3.57
40139LBG7 Guardian Life Glob Fun Note
5.550% Due 10/28/2027
1,000,000.00 06/13/2023
5.09%
1,017,710.00
1,016,511.58
100.37
5.45%
1,003,691.00
23,587.50
0.73%
(12,820.58)
Aa1 / AA+
NR
4.08 3.53
023135CP9 Amazon.com Inc Callable Note Cont 11/1/2027
4.550% Due 12/01/2027
1,500,000.00 06/29/2023
4.71%
1,490,595.00
1,491,120.09
97.93 5.11%
1,468,963.50
22,750.00
1.06%
(22,156.59)
A1 / AA
AA-
4.17 3.69
78016FZW7 Royal Bank of Canada Note
4.900% Due 01/12/2028
1,000,000.00 07/25/2023
5.26%
985,680.00
986,259.83
97.13 5.66%
971,290.00
10,752.78
0.70%
(14,969.83)
A1 / A
AA-
4.29 3.76
91324PEP3 United Health Group Inc Callable Note Cont 1/15/2028
5.250% Due 02/15/2028
1,000,000.00 07/06/2023
5.02%
1,009,290.00
1,008,822.68
100.17
5.20%
1,001,699.00
6,708.33
0.72%
(7,123.68)
A2 / A+
A
4.38 3.84
931142FB4 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 3/15/28
3.900% Due 04/15/2028
1,500,000.00 06/13/2023
4.39%
1,468,365.00
1,470,299.64
95.47 5.03%
1,431,996.00
26,487.50
1.04%
(38,303.64)
Aa2 / AA
AA
4.55 4.02
61747YER2 Morgan Stanley Callable Note Cont 4/20/2027
4.210% Due 04/20/2028
1,000,000.00 07/19/2023
5.33%
963,360.00
964,880.51
94.03 5.97%
940,281.00
18,828.06
0.68%
(24,599.51)
A1 / A-
A+
4.56 3.97
74456QBU9 Public Service El & Gas Callable Note Cont 02/01/28
3.700% Due 05/01/2028
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
4.63%
959,700.00
962,311.62
93.60 5.29%
936,038.00
15,416.67
0.68%
(26,273.62)
A1 / A
NR
4.59 4.07
341081GN1 Florida Power and Light Callable Note Cont 3/15/2028
4.400% Due 05/15/2028
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
4.62%
990,280.00
990,905.01
96.42 5.28%
964,249.00
16,255.56
0.70%
(26,656.01)
Aa2 / A+
AA-
4.63 4.05
66815L2M0 Northwestern Mutual Glbl Note
4.900% Due 06/12/2028
1,000,000.00 06/05/2023
4.85%
1,002,150.00
1,002,019.38
97.38 5.54%
973,831.00
14,836.11
0.70%
(28,188.38)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.70 4.07
64952WFD0 New York Life Global Note
4.900% Due 06/13/2028
1,000,000.00 06/06/2023
4.87%
1,001,450.00
1,001,362.70
97.22 5.58%
972,236.00
14,700.00
0.70%
(29,126.70)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.71 4.07
74340XCG4 Prologis LP Callable Note Cont 5/15/2028
4.875% Due 06/15/2028
1,000,000.00 07/25/2023
5.06%
992,020.00
992,315.06
97.44 5.50%
974,364.00
12,593.75
0.70%
(17,951.06)
A3 / A
NR
4.71 4.09
24422EXB0 John Deere Capital Corp Note
4.950% Due 07/14/2028
1,000,000.00 07/11/2023
4.96%
999,758.30
999,768.75
98.62 5.28%
986,189.00
10,587.51
0.71%
(13,579.75)
A2 / A
A+
4.79 4.16
89115A2U5 Toronto-Dominion Bank Note
5.523% Due 07/17/2028
1,000,000.00 07/10/2023
5.51%
1,000,690.00
1,000,661.30
98.70 5.83%
987,039.00
11,352.83
0.71%
(13,622.30)
A1 / A
AA-
4.80 4.11
As of September 30, 2023
34 Item: 7
63 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
06051GKW8 Bank of America Corp Callable Note Cont 7/22/2027
4.948% Due 07/22/2028
1,000,000.00 07/19/2023
5.81%
982,540.00
983,200.13
96.09 6.11%
960,863.00
9,483.67
0.69%
(22,337.13)
A1 / A-
AA-
4.81 3.38
46647PDG8 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note Cont 7/25/2027
4.851% Due 07/25/2028
1,000,000.00 07/20/2023
5.70%
983,510.00
984,123.75
96.40 5.92%
963,965.00
8,893.50
0.69%
(20,158.75)
A1 / A-
AA-
4.82 3.40
TOTAL Corporate 35,000,000.00 5.15%
34,553,358.30
34,587,831.45 5.61%
34,026,912.50
475,171.18
24.59%
(560,918.95)
A1 / A+
AA-
3.54 2.97
Money Market Fund
60934N807 Federated Investors Govt Oblig Fund Inst.
182,358.31 Various
4.98%
182,358.31
182,358.31
1.00 4.98%
182,358.31
0.00 0.13%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00 0.00
TOTAL Money Market Fund 182,358.31 4.98%
182,358.31
182,358.31 4.98%
182,358.31
0.00 0.13%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00 0.00
Supranational
4581X0EK0 Inter-American Dev Bank Note
4.500% Due 05/15/2026
2,800,000.00 06/27/2023
4.53%
2,797,844.00
2,798,023.67
98.87 4.96%
2,768,379.60
29,750.00
1.99%
(29,644.07)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
2.62 2.42
45950KDD9 International Finance Corp Note
4.500% Due 07/13/2028
1,280,000.00 07/06/2023
4.53%
1,278,579.20
1,278,641.41
98.82 4.78%
1,264,881.92
12,480.00
0.91%
(13,759.49)
Aaa / AAA
NR
4.79 4.21
TOTAL Supranational 4,080,000.00 4.53%
4,076,423.20
4,076,665.08 4.91%
4,033,261.52
42,230.00
2.91%
(43,403.56)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
3.30 2.98
US Treasury
912796ZY8 US Treasury Bill
5.242% Due 01/25/2024
3,500,000.00 07/25/2023
5.46%
3,406,736.08
3,406,736.08
97.34 5.46%
3,406,736.08
34,145.81
2.45%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.32 0.31
912797FH5 US Treasury Bill
4.938% Due 05/16/2024
3,500,000.00 06/06/2023
5.19%
3,334,868.06
3,334,868.06
95.28 5.19%
3,334,868.06
55,684.03
2.42%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.63 0.61
912797GB7 US Treasury Bill
5.110% Due 07/11/2024
3,500,000.00 07/25/2023
5.38%
3,325,621.25
3,325,621.25
95.02 5.38%
3,325,621.25
33,285.97
2.39%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.78 0.76
91282CFN6 US Treasury Note
4.250% Due 09/30/2024
3,500,000.00 07/19/2023
5.22%
3,461,035.16
3,467,529.30
98.83 5.47%
3,459,120.00
406.42
2.47%
(8,409.30)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.00 0.96
91282CGD7 US Treasury Note
4.250% Due 12/31/2024
3,500,000.00 06/13/2023
4.88%
3,467,597.66
3,473,837.69
98.65 5.37%
3,452,830.50
37,591.71
2.49%
(21,007.19)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.25 1.19
91282CGN5 US Treasury Note
4.625% Due 02/28/2025
3,500,000.00 07/18/2023
4.93%
3,483,183.59
3,485,292.77
99.09 5.29%
3,468,283.00
13,786.06
2.48%
(17,009.77)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.42 1.35
As of September 30, 2023
35 Item: 7
64 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CHD6 US Treasury Note
4.250% Due 05/31/2025
3,500,000.00 06/05/2023
4.45%
3,486,601.56
3,488,763.79
98.52 5.19%
3,448,046.00
49,989.75
2.49%
(40,717.79)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.67 1.56
91282CHL8 US Treasury Note
4.625% Due 06/30/2025
3,500,000.00 07/06/2023
5.05%
3,472,246.09
3,475,542.83
99.14 5.14%
3,470,057.50
40,908.63
2.50%
(5,485.33)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.75 1.64
91282CGA3 US Treasury Note
4.000% Due 12/15/2025
3,500,000.00 06/16/2023
4.52%
3,458,027.34
3,462,783.32
97.92 5.00%
3,427,130.00
41,311.48
2.47%
(35,653.32)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.21 2.06
91282CHB0 US Treasury Note
3.625% Due 05/15/2026
3,500,000.00 06/05/2023
4.10%
3,454,609.38
3,459,554.17
96.93 4.88%
3,392,676.00
47,922.89
2.45%
(66,878.17)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.62 2.43
91282CEW7 US Treasury Note
3.250% Due 06/30/2027
3,500,000.00 06/06/2023
3.99%
3,404,160.16
3,411,651.68
95.01 4.72%
3,325,409.50
28,746.60
2.39%
(86,242.18)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
3.75 3.44
91282CFU0 US Treasury Note
4.125% Due 10/31/2027
3,500,000.00 06/29/2023
4.23%
3,485,234.38
3,486,101.30
97.87 4.70%
3,425,488.50
60,417.80
2.48%
(60,612.80)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
4.09 3.65
91282CHE4 US Treasury Note
3.625% Due 05/31/2028
3,500,000.00 06/05/2023
3.81%
3,470,878.91
3,472,749.95
95.84 4.62%
3,354,533.00
42,638.32
2.42%
(118,216.95)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
4.67 4.18
91282CHK0 US Treasury Note
4.000% Due 06/30/2028
3,500,000.00 06/28/2023
4.00%
3,500,273.44
3,500,259.52
97.33 4.63%
3,406,620.00
35,380.43
2.45%
(93,639.52)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
4.75 4.23
TOTAL US Treasury 49,000,000.00 4.65%
48,211,073.06
48,251,291.71 5.08%
47,697,419.39
522,215.90
34.37%
(553,872.32)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.21 2.02
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 142,632,358.31 4.83%
140,654,332.12
140,785,760.49 5.27%
138,884,762.44
1,405,934.20
100.00%
(1,900,998.05)
Aa1 / AA+
AA+
2.94 2.43
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 140,290,696.64
As of September 30, 2023
36 Item: 7
65 Holdings Report
Lake Forest Reporting - Account #11084
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
LAIF
90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool
515,334.01 Various
3.61%
515,334.01
515,334.01
1.00 3.61%
515,334.01
3,882.82
1.13%
0.00 NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL LAIF 515,334.01 3.61%
515,334.01
515,334.01 3.61%
515,334.01
3,882.82
1.13%
0.00 NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
Local Gov Investment Pool
900CIP$01 Orange County Investment Pool
127,500.27 Various
0.40%
127,500.27
127,500.27
1.00 0.40%
127,500.27
0.00 0.28%
0.00 NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
90CAMP$00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP
45,359,141.18 Various
5.52%
45,359,141.18
45,359,141.18
1.00 5.52%
45,359,141.18
0.00 98.59%
0.00 NR / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL Local Gov Investment Pool 45,486,641.45 5.51% 45,486,641.45
45,486,641.45 5.51%
45,486,641.45
0.00 98.87%
0.00 NR / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 46,001,975.46 5.48%
46,001,975.46
46,001,975.46 5.48%
46,001,975.46
3,882.82
100.00%
0.00 NR / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 46,005,858.28
As of September 30, 2023
37 Item: 7
66 SECTION |
Section 5 |
Transactions
38 Item: 7
67 Transaction Ledger
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/03/2023 023135CP9 1,500,000.00 Amazon.com Inc Callable Note Cont 11/1/2027
4.55% Due: 12/01/2027
99.373 4.71% 1,490,595.00 6,066.67 1,496,661.67 0.00
Purchase 07/06/2023 3137FBU79 2,345,000.00 FHLMC K069 A2
3.187% Due: 09/25/2027
94.602 5.32% 2,218,406.64 1,037.99 2,219,444.63 0.00
Purchase 07/06/2023 4581X0EK0 2,800,000.00 Inter-American Dev Bank Note
4.5% Due: 05/15/2026
99.923 4.53% 2,797,844.00 0.00 2,797,844.00 0.00
Purchase 07/07/2023 91282CHL8 3,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
4.625% Due: 06/30/2025
99.207 5.05% 3,472,246.09 3,079.14 3,475,325.23 0.00
Purchase 07/10/2023 66815L2L2 1,000,000.00 Northwestern Mutual Glbl Note
4.7% Due: 04/06/2026
97.986 5.50% 979,860.00 12,272.22 992,132.22 0.00
Purchase 07/10/2023 91324PEP3 1,000,000.00 United Health Group Inc Callable Note Cont 1/15/2028
5.25% Due: 02/15/2028
100.929 5.02% 1,009,290.00 21,145.83 1,030,435.83 0.00
Purchase 07/12/2023 857477CB7 1,000,000.00 State Street Bank Callable Note Cont 5/18/2023
5.104% Due: 05/18/2026
99.348 5.84% 993,480.00 7,656.00 1,001,136.00 0.00
Purchase 07/13/2023 45950KDD9 1,280,000.00 International Finance Corp Note
4.5% Due: 07/13/2028
99.889 4.53% 1,278,579.20 0.00 1,278,579.20 0.00
Purchase 07/14/2023 24422EXB0 430,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
4.95% Due: 07/14/2028
99.851 4.98% 429,359.30 0.00 429,359.30 0.00
Purchase 07/14/2023 24422EXB0 570,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
4.95% Due: 07/14/2028
100.070 4.93% 570,399.00 0.00 570,399.00 0.00
Purchase 07/14/2023 362583AD8 1,000,000.00 GM Auto Receivable Trust 2023-2 A3
4.47% Due: 02/16/2028
98.633 5.17% 986,328.13 3,476.67 989,804.80 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2023 89115A2U5 1,000,000.00 Toronto-Dominion Bank Note
5.523% Due: 07/17/2028
100.069 5.51% 1,000,690.00 0.00 1,000,690.00 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2023 05592XAD2 275,000.00 BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A A3
5.47% Due: 02/25/2028
99.982 5.54% 274,951.27 0.00 274,951.27 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2023 05592XAD2 1,000,000.00 BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A A3
5.47% Due: 02/25/2028
100.578 5.16% 1,005,781.25 0.00 1,005,781.25 0.00
June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
39 Item: 7
68 Transaction Ledger
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Purchase 07/19/2023 3130AWLY4 3,500,000.00 FHLB Note
5.125% Due: 06/13/2025
100.546 4.82% 3,519,110.00 4,484.38 3,523,594.38 0.00
Purchase 07/19/2023 36267KAD9 315,000.00 GM Financial Securitized Term 2023-3 A3
5.45% Due: 06/16/2028
99.996 5.51% 314,987.84 0.00 314,987.84 0.00
Purchase 07/19/2023 91282CGN5 3,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
4.625% Due: 02/28/2025
99.520 4.93% 3,483,183.59 62,022.76 3,545,206.35 0.00
Purchase 07/20/2023 74153WCR8 1,000,000.00 Pricoa Global Funding Note
4.2% Due: 08/28/2025
97.697 5.37% 976,970.00 16,566.67 993,536.67 0.00
Purchase 07/20/2023 91282CFN6 3,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
4.25% Due: 09/30/2024
98.887 5.22% 3,461,035.16 45,112.70 3,506,147.86 0.00
Purchase 07/21/2023 43815JAC7 500,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2023-1 A3
5.04% Due: 04/21/2027
99.719 5.24% 498,593.75 0.00 498,593.75 0.00
Purchase 07/21/2023 61747YER2 1,000,000.00 Morgan Stanley Callable Note Cont 4/20/2027
4.21% Due: 04/20/2028
96.336 5.33% 963,360.00 10,641.95 974,001.95 0.00
Purchase 07/24/2023 06051GKW8 1,000,000.00 Bank of America Corp Callable Note Cont 7/22/2027
4.948% Due: 07/22/2028
98.254 5.81% 982,540.00 274.89 982,814.89 0.00
Purchase 07/25/2023 46647PDG8 1,000,000.00 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note Cont 7/25/2027
4.851% Due: 07/25/2028
98.351 5.70% 983,510.00 0.00 983,510.00 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2023 3133EPPR0 3,500,000.00 FFCB Note
4.625% Due: 04/10/2026
99.725 4.74% 3,490,375.00 7,194.44 3,497,569.44 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2023 912796ZY8 3,500,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.242% Due: 01/25/2024
97.335 5.46% 3,406,736.08 0.00 3,406,736.08 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2023 912797GB7 3,500,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.11% Due: 07/11/2024
95.018 5.38% 3,325,621.25 0.00 3,325,621.25 0.00
Purchase 07/27/2023 74340XCG4 1,000,000.00 Prologis LP Callable Note Cont 5/15/2028
4.875% Due: 06/15/2028
99.202 5.06% 992,020.00 3,927.08 995,947.08 0.00
Purchase 07/27/2023 78016FZW7 1,000,000.00 Royal Bank of Canada Note
4.9% Due: 01/12/2028
98.568 5.26% 985,680.00 2,041.67 987,721.67 0.00
Purchase 07/27/2023 92348KBL6 1,115,000.00 Verizon Master Trust 2023-2 A
4.89% Due: 04/13/2028
99.008 5.39% 1,103,937.11 1,060.18 1,104,997.29 0.00
June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
40 Item: 7
69 Transaction Ledger
Lake Forest Operating Reserve - Account #11083
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Purchase 07/28/2023 3133EPRS6 3,500,000.00 FFCB Note
4.875% Due: 07/28/2025
99.772 5.00% 3,492,020.00 0.00 3,492,020.00 0.00
Purchase 07/28/2023 3137F4D41 2,500,000.00 FHLMC K074 A2
3.6% Due: 01/25/2028
95.441 5.78% 2,386,035.15 6,750.00 2,392,785.15 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2023 161571HT4 680,000.00 Chase Issuance Trust 23-A1 A
5.16% Due: 09/15/2028
99.972 5.23% 679,811.50 0.00 679,811.50 0.00
Subtotal 54,310,000.00 53,553,336.31 214,811.24 53,768,147.55 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 54,310,000.00 53,553,336.31 214,811.24 53,768,147.55 0.00 June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
41 Item: 7
70 Transaction Ledger
Lake Forest Reporting - Account #11084
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/15/2023 90LAIF$00 377,744.59 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 3.26% 377,744.59 0.00 377,744.59 0.00 Purchase 07/28/2023 900CIP$00 122,296.10 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 3.50% 122,296.10 0.00 122,296.10 0.00 Purchase 07/31/2023 90CAMP$00 201,939.22 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 5.43% 201,939.22 0.00 201,939.22 0.00 Purchase 08/31/2023 900CIP$01 120,568.90 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 0.40% 120,568.90 0.00 120,568.90 0.00 Purchase 08/31/2023 90CAMP$00 210,656.88 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 5.54% 210,656.88 0.00 210,656.88 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2023 900CIP$01 1,414.55 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 0.40% 1,414.55 0.00 1,414.55 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2023 90CAMP$00 205,900.03 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 5.52% 205,900.03 0.00 205,900.03 0.00 Subtotal 1,240,520.27 1,240,520.27 0.00 1,240,520.27 0.00 Security
Contribution
08/01/2023 900CIP$01 340,554.68 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 340,554.68 0.00 340,554.68 0.00 Subtotal 340,554.68 340,554.68 0.00 340,554.68 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 1,581,074.95 1,581,074.95 0.00 1,581,074.95 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Security
Withdrawal
08/01/2023 900CIP$00 340,554.68 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 340,554.68 0.00 340,554.68 0.00 Security
Withdrawal
08/01/2023 900CIP$01 19.58 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 19.58 0.00 19.58 0.00 Security
Withdrawal
08/29/2023 900CIP$01 335,000.00 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 335,000.00 0.00 335,000.00 0.00 Security
Withdrawal
09/01/2023 900CIP$01 18.28 Orange County Investment Pool 1.000 18.28 0.00 18.28 0.00 Subtotal 675,592.54 675,592.54 0.00 675,592.54 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 675,592.54 675,592.54 0.00 675,592.54 0.00 June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
42 Item: 7
71 Benchmark Disclosures
ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index
The ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.
As of September 30, 2023
43 Item: 7
72 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARK RENOVATIONS:
SUNDOWNER AND VINTAGE PARKS PROJECT (PW 2017-17D)
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Find that Diamond Construction & Design has completed construction of the Neighborhood Park Renovations: Sundowner and Vintage Parks Project (PW 2017-17D).
2. Approve the Notice of Completion and authorize the Mayor to execute the document on behalf of the City.
3. Authorize the City Clerk to submit Notice of Completion for recordation to the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County within fifteen days of the City Council approval, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code.
4. Authorize staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On April 19, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Diamond Construction & Design ("Diamond") in the amount of $944,047.18 for the Neighborhood Park Renovations: Vintage and Sundowner Parks (“Project”) (PW 2017-17D). In general, the improvements at Vintage Park consist of grading, landscaping, irrigation, site furnishings, redesigned play area with resilient surfacing, new playground equipment, a new shade structure, and a pathway with exercise equipment. At Sundowner Park, the improvements consist of removal and replacement of various park amenities.
The Project began on July 18, 2022. The City Manager authorized Contract Change Order (“CCO”) #1, Contract Change Order #2 (“CCO #2”), and Contract Change Order #3 (“CCO #3“), which together resulted in a $15,807.75 net reduction to the compensation in the contract with Diamond. The Project was substantially completed on June 2, 2023. The total construction cost, including the three CCO’s, Item: 8
73 is $928,239.43. After final inspection of the Project, determination of final quantities, approval of the project change orders, and progress payment processing, the Project is now ready for the Notice of Completion.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Notice of Completion (Attachment 1) and direct staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law. Sufficient funding exists in the Capital Improvement Plan ("CIP") budget to cover the costs of the recommended actions.
BACKGROUND:
In July 2018, the City Council approved the conceptual designs and authorized RJM Design Group (“RJM”), the City’s Park Design Consultant, to prepare final designs and construction documents for the ten (10) City Neighborhood Parks Renovation Project.
Construction of improvements at five of the parks was completed in previous years.
Previously completed parks included Cherry Park, Peachwood Park, Darin Park, Montbury Park, and Pebble Creek Park. Improvements at Borrego Overlook, Rancho Serrano, and Regency Parks were completed earlier this year. Vintage Park and Sundowner Park improvements are the last two parks completed within this program.
DISCUSSION:
On April 19, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Diamond in the amount of $944,047.18 to complete improvements. The Project began on July 18, 2022, and construction was substantially completed on June 2, 2023. The City’s construction manager conducted a final inspection to ensure the Project’s completion per the contract requirements. The City Manager authorized CCO #1, CCO #2, and CCO #3, which in total resulted in a $15,807.75 net reduction in the contract amount with Diamond. The total construction cost, including the three contract change orders, totals $928,239.42.
The Notice of Completion establishes a date that limits the time subcontractors and material vendors may file stop notices or liens against the Project. Following City Council approval, the City Clerk must submit the Notice of Completion to the Clerk- Recorder of Orange County within 15 days of the City Council’s action, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code. Following approval and recordation, the Notice of Completion establishes a 30-day period for subcontractors and material vendors to file stop payment notices and initiates the start date for the warranty period. The contractor has met all contractual obligations, and the City has accepted the work. Since the work has been completed and accepted by the City, staff recommends that the City Council approve the Notice of Completion and direct staff Item: 8
74 to release the retention payment 30 days after recording the Notice of completion, providing there are no stop notices for the project on file with the City.
Approving the recommended actions would find the project complete, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Notice of Completion and allow staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of the recommended action would allow staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law. The total contract cost of the project is $928,239.42. The Capital Improvement Plan budget has sufficient funds available for the recommended actions.
ATTACHMENTS:
Notice of Completion for the Neighborhood Park Renovations: Vintage Park, and Sundowner Park Project (PW 2017-17D)
Initiated By: Nazila Mokarram, Principal Civil Engineer Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 8
75 Attachment
Item: 8
76 RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center
Drive
Lake Forest, California, 92630
Fee Exempt – Gov’t Code §27383
NOTI
CE OF COMPLETION
(C.C.C. 9204 - PUBLIC WORKS)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Lake Forest located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, 92630, has completed a public work of improvement described as
Neighborhood Park Renovations: Vintage Park and Sundowner Park Project (PW 2017-17D) and accepted by the awarding authority upon the date hereof.
2. Date of completion: November 7, 2023
3. Description of
work performed: Neighborhood Park Renovations: Vintage Park and Sundowner Park Project (PW 2017-17D)
4. The City’s interest in the property
in which the public work was completed is: X Fee Easement Lease.
5. The real property upon which said public work was performed in the City of Lake Forest is: Public right-of-way in the City of Lake Forest.
6. The contractor was: Diamond Construction and Design Dated ____________________________________ __________________________________________ Doug Cirbo, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the Mayor of the City of Lake Forest, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof, the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at Lake Forest, California, on this ____ day of _________________, 2023. __________________________________________
Doug Cirbo, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________________
Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Item: 8
77 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGNS PROJECT (PW 2021-06)
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve contract documents for construction of the Citywide Street Name Signs Project (PW 2021-06).
2. Adopt Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24.
3. Award a contract in the amount of $816,998 to Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.
4. Reject all other bids received and authorize return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.
5. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Pursuant to the City’s Strategic Business Plan to invest and maintain public facilities, infrastructure, and natural resources to enhance visual character of the City and support quality neighborhoods, the Citywide Street Name Signs project would replace approximately 2,300 street name signs and 345 internally illuminated street name signs that are mounted on the overhead traffic signal arms with the new updated sign type, City logo, and background color.
The project was advertised on August 24, 2023. On September 19, 2023, the City received four (4) bids for this project ranging from $816,998 to $2,064,000.
The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. (“Bear Electrical”). The total project cost, including the traffic signal street Item: 9
78 name signs, inspection, construction support, and contingency for the project is estimated to be $880,000. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council approve the attached Construction Contract with Bear Electrical (Attachment 2). The signed cover sheet of the bid documents is provided as Attachment 3 to this report.
On December 6, 2022, the City Council approved the design of the neighborhood street name signs, directed staff to add traffic signal internally illuminated street name signs to the project, and instructed staff to bring back a budget adjustment with the award of the project. This project is funded by the General Fund and there are currently $300,000 allocated for this project per the Fiscal Year 2023- 25 Capital Improvement Program budget. In addition to recommending the award of a construction contract to Bear Electrical, staff recommend approving a budget amendment to increase the project funding by $580,000 to fully fund the Citywide Street Name Signs project (Attachment 4). The proposed budget amendment would result in a total budget of $880,000 for the project.
Should the City Council approve the recommended actions, sufficient funds would be available within the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Program budget.
BACKGROUND:
On June 15, 2023, the City Council approved the City’s Strategic Business Plan (“Strategic Plan”). The Strategic Plan includes the major goals established by the City Council and a series of initiatives that facilitate progress towards each goal.
As part of the Strategic Plan, the second priority area is attractiveness, which consists of investing and maintaining public facilities, infrastructure, and natural resources to enhance the visual character of the City and support quality neighborhoods. Strategic Plan initiative #14 identified the desire to replace and refresh the City’s street name signs. Initiative #14 identified a total budget of $300,000 for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 to cover the costs of updating the City’s street name signs. The initiative did not originally include the internally illuminated street name signs that are mounted on the overhead traffic signal arms in the project scope or budget.
On December 6, 2022, the City Council approved the design of the neighborhood street name signs and directed staff to include the replacement of the traffic signal internally illuminated street name signs. It was estimated that the total project cost for the street name signs, and the traffic signal street name signs would total $880,000. The City Council directed staff to solicit bids for both street name sign types and to request additional funding based upon the bid results at the time a contract would be brought forth for award.
Item: 9
79 On June 20, 2023, the City Council approved the updated City’s Strategic Plan, which revised the numbering scheme for the Strategic Plan initiatives. As a result, the Strategic Plan initiative number for this project changed from #14 to #24 while the budget and project scope remained the same from the previous City Council approval.
DISCUSSION:
This project will replace approximately 2,300 street name signs and 345 internally illuminated street name signs that are mounted on the overhead traffic signal arms. The current signs have a green background with no City logo and the replacement signs will have an updated sign type, City logo, and background color (as shown below).
Image 1: New Street Name Sign
Should the proposed Construction Contract with Bear Electrical be approved, staff anticipates construction to begin in February 2024. The Construction Contract specifies 270 calendar days to complete the work with an anticipated project completion date in December 2024.
On September 19, 2023, the City received bids from four (4) qualified firms, ranging from $816,998 to $2,064,000. An additional bidder, Square Signs, LLC, was disqualified for not having the required contractor’s license to perform the work and their base bid was $670,047.58. The engineer’s estimate for this project is $880,000. The City utilized an electronic bidding system (known as OpenGov), which eliminates mathematical errors in the bids. Therefore, the submitted bid results for the project are shown Table 1.
Item: 9
80 Table 1: Bid Results
Contracting Firm OpenGov Verified Base Bid
Amounts
Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. $ 816,998
BC Rentals LLC $ 999,986
Select Electric, Inc. $1,547,745
Sterndahl Enterprises LLC $2,064,000
After analysis of the bids received, staff determined that Bear Electrical was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for this project. Recently, Bear Electrical completed projects in the cities of Aliso Viejo and Laguna Niguel through their maintenance contract. In addition, Bear Electrical is the City’s traffic signal maintenance contractor. Staff conducted a reference check that indicated Bear Electrical is a responsible contractor (Attachment 1).
The Finance Department prepared the Construction Contract which Bear Electrical subsequently executed (Attachment 2). The City Attorney reviewed and approved the contract as to form. The contract bid amount as determined by the estimated quantities is $816,998.00. Per the Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, the City Manager may approve additional work not-to-exceed 10% of the original contract amount ($81,699.80). The contract plans and specifications are not attached to the agenda due to their size; however, they are available in the Office of the City Clerk, and on City’s digital bid advertising platform (OpenGov). Staff attached the approved signed title sheet for the Citywide Street Name Signs project (Attachment 3).
The funds for the Citywide Street Name Signs project are from the General Fund.
Currently, $300,000 is budgeted in Fiscal Year 2023-24 of the 2023-2025 CIP Budget for this purpose. A proposed budget amendment (Attachment 4) to increase the funding by $580,000 is attached to this report for City Council approval, as it is required to ensure the Construction Contract with Bear Electrical is fully funded. This would increase the project budget to a total of $880,000. The proposed budget amount would include the cost of traffic signal street name signs and covers the cost to construct, inspect, provide construction support, and provide contingency for the project. Should the budget amendment be approved, there would be sufficient funds available in the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Program budget for the recommended action.
Therefore, staff recommends the City Council award the Construction Contract with Bear Electrical and adopt a budget resolution to amend the project budget.
Item: 9
81 FISCAL IMPACT:
With the inclusion of the traffic signal street name signs, the total cost of the project including the cost of construction, inspection, construction support, and contingency for this project is estimated to be $880,000. Approving the recommended actions would award a construction contract to Bear Electrical in the amount of $816,998. The 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Program budget allocated $300,000 for the Citywide Street Name Signs Project. The attached proposed budget resolution would provide an additional $580,000 from the City’s General Fund to cover the additional costs of including the traffic signal internally illuminated street name signs.
Therefore, with the approval of the recommended actions, there would be sufficient funds available within the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Program budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contractor’s Reference Check
2. Proposed Construction Contract with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.
3. Construction Bid Documents – Signed Title Sheet
4. Proposed Budget Resolution
Initiated By: Tran Tran, Traffic Engineering Manager
Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 9
82 ATTACHMENT 1
Item: 9
83 PW 2021-06 - Citywide Street Name Signs Project
Apparent Low Bidder:
Contact #1: Contact #2: Contact #3:Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.
Name
Email
Shaun Pelletier Jeff Metz Brett Canedy
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Phone No. 949-425-2533 949-362-4344 949-470-8422
QUESTION RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE
1. Title and type of project Traffic Signal Maintenance Services Traffic Signal Maintenance Services Traffic Signal Maintenance Services
2. Contract Amount $1.3 million $290,000 $920,000
3. Approximate duration 8 years 3 years
n/a
Two years
6/30/20254. Actual or estimated project completion date 6/30/2024
5. Quality of the work (Rate 1-5) Very Good
Good
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good6. Similarity of the Project (Rate 1-5)
7. Contractor’s relationship with agency representatives (Rate 1-5) Very Good Very Good Very Good
8. Claims or stop notices (Yes/No)
9. Change order requests (Yes/No)
No
No
No
No
No
No
10. Agency’s desire to have contractor bid on future projects (Yes/No) Yes Yes Yes
Bear recently completed their first traffic
signal maintenance contract with the
City of Mission Viejo (Oct. 2019 - June
2023) and was the successful bidder for
the 2023-2025 contract. Bear has an
option to renew the contract for 2025-
2027 before the contract has to be bid
again.
Maintain/replace SNS but not often
required11. Additional Comments n/a
Item: 9
84 ATTACHMENT 2
Item: 9
85 2023-077
CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGNS (PW 2021-06)
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.
Lake Forest, CA 92630
DocuSign Envelope ID: 969810C8-26F4-4CA5-B291-49F577B2A41F Item: 9
86 City of Lake Forest
REQUEST FOR BIDS (RFB)
2023-RFB-017
Citywide Street Name Signs (PW 2021-06)
I. SECTION 00500 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
DocuSign Envelope ID: 969810C8-26F4-4CA5-B291-49F577B2A41F Item: 9
87 Request for Bids (RFB) #2023-077
Title: Citywide Street Name Signs (PW 2021-06)
3 4. SECTION 00500 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
4.1. CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made this [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***], in the County of Orange, State of California, by and between the City of Lake Forest hereinafter called City, and Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc.., hereinafter called Contractor. City and the Contractor for the considerations stated herein agree as follows:
4.2. SCOPE OF WORK
The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated the contract and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in "COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT" section below for the following Project:
Citywide Street Name Signs, PW 2021-06
The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.
4.3. TIME FOR COMPLETION
The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within two hundred seventy (270) calendar days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.
4.4. CONTRACT PRICE
City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT DOLLARS ($816,998.00). Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions.
4.5. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay City the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event that Liquidated Damages are not paid, the Contractor agrees City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract.
This Article does not affect the City’s rights to other damages or remedies specified in the Contract Documents or allowed by law.
4.6. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT
The “Contract Documents” include the following:
Notice Inviting Bids
DocuSign Envelope ID: 969810C8-26F4-4CA5-B291-49F577B2A41F Item: 9
88 Request for Bids (RFB) #2023-077
Title: Citywide Street Name Signs (PW 2021-06)
4 Instructions to Bidders
Bid Form
Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation Bid Bond
Designation of Subcontractors
Information Required of Bidders
Noncollusion Declaration form
Iran Contracting Act Certification
Public Works Contractor Registration Certification
Contract
Performance Bond
Payment Bond
General Conditions
Special Conditions
Technical Specifications
Addenda
Plans and Drawings
Approved and fully executed change orders
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contactor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.
All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.
4.7. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW
Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Project.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 969810C8-26F4-4CA5-B291-49F577B2A41F Item: 9
89 Request for Bids (RFB) #2023-077
Title: Citywide Street Name Signs (PW 2021-06)
5 4.8. INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor shall provide indemnification as set forth in the General Conditions.
4.9. PREVAILING WAGES
Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at City Hall or may be obtained online at http//www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr. and which must be posted at the job site.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 969810C8-26F4-4CA5-B291-49F577B2A41F Item: 9
90 Request for Bids (RFB) #2023-077
Title: Citywide Street Name Signs (PW 2021-06)
6 4.10. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.
BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
By [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]
Name: Robert Asuncion
Title: Vice President
License No. [CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER]
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
By [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
______________________________
Doug Cirbo
Mayor
By [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]
Name: [Andrew Bader
Title: [Chief Financial Officer
(If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR
Vice President AND Secretary OR Treasurer
REQUIRED)]
Attest:
[CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
[CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL]
[PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL]
[CITY CLERK - INSURANCE APPROVAL]
Approved as to Form:
[CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
__________________________________
Best Best & Krieger, LLP
City Attorney
DocuSign Envelope ID: 969810C8-26F4-4CA5-B291-49F577B2A41F 982079
Item: 9
91 ATTACHMENT 3
Item: 9
92 CITY OF LAKE FOREST
CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGNS (PW 2021-06)
PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
JUNE 2023
Prepared By:
Tran Tran, P.E.
Traffic Engineering Manager
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
________________________________
Tran Tran, P.E., RCE 79710
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Public Works Department
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
_______________________
Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E.
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Item: 9
93 ATTACHMENT 4
Item: 9
94 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE 2023 -2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN;
AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2023-24
WHEREAS, the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan was adopted by the City Council on June 20, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the appropriations for Fiscal Year 2023-24 were adopted by the City Council on June 20, 2023;
WHEREAS, modifications are now required as a result of changes during Fiscal Year 2023-24.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
FOREST DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council’s adoption of this Resolution is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, the City’s adoption of the Resolution is an administrative and fiscal function of the City that does not commit the City to any specific project or course of action. (State CEQA Guidelines, sections 15378(b)(4) & (b)(5).) Thus, no environmental review of the Resolution is required. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption within five working days of the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 2. General Fund CIP Projects is amended to increase its Capital Improvement Plan Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2023-24 as demonstrated in Exhibit A.
Section 3. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to move appropriations between line items within departmental budgets in concurrence with Department Directors.
Section 4. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from one department to another or between funds within the Operating Budget with notification to the City Council Audit Committee.
Item: 9
95 Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from a capital improvement project to another existing project within the adopted Capital Improvement Program with notification to the City Council Audit Committee.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall attest as to the adoption and execution of this Resolution and cause the same to be maintained in the permanent records of the City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
DOUG CIRBO
MAYOR
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MATTHEW RICHARDSON
CITY ATTORNEY
Item: 9
96 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the 7th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
Item: 9
97 EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT TO THE 2023-2030
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN,
AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR
2023-24 APPROPRIATIONS
Capital Improvement Plan Appropriations
Funding Source
Project
Current
Budget
Increase
(Decrease)
Amended
Budget
General Fund
CIP Projects
Street Name
Signs
$300,000
$580,000
$880,000
Total $880,000
Item: 9
98 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/07/2023
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE MEASURE M2
EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
With the renewal of Measure M (“M2”), local jurisdictions, including the City, are required to submit an annual account of M2 revenue and expenditures to the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) by December 31st of each year. In Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City expended $72,282 of Measure M2 funds on the Senior Mobility Program. The City did not expend any Measure M2 funds for street repaving and slurry seal projects. Prior to submitting the accounting to OCTA, the City Council must adopt, by resolution, the attached M2 expenditure report in the approved OCTA format. Adoption of the proposed resolution and submittal of the expenditure report to the OCTA ensures the City remains eligible for future M2 funding.
BACKGROUND:
In 1990, Orange County voters approved Measure M (1991-2011), a 20-year program for local transportation improvements funded by a half-cent sales tax and entrusted the OCTA to administer the funds. Measure M was designated to fund transportation improvement projects in three major areas – freeways, streets and roads, and transit. The initial Measure M plan ended March 31, 2011.
On November 7, 2006, Orange County voters renewed the additional sales tax measure extending the funding for transportation purposes until 2041.
Item: 10
99 DISCUSSION:
Measure M2 continues funding for transportation purposes until 2041. With the passage of M2, local agencies must continue to demonstrate eligibility. The M2 eligibility process began in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2010-11 and will continue on an annual basis through 2041. One of the funding requirements emphasizes financial accountability and requires each local agency to submit an expenditure report to the OCTA each year. Specifically, Ordinance No. 3 of the Local Transportation Authority requires the following:
“Local jurisdictions must adopt and provide an annual expenditure report to OCTA to account for M2 funds, developer/traffic impact fees, and funds expended by the jurisdiction to satisfy maintenance of effort requirements.” Pursuant to the above requirement, staff prepared the report and proposed resolution, which are required within six months of each jurisdiction’s fiscal year end. The report includes all M2 net revenue, fund balances and interest earned, and identifies expenditures by activity type and fund source. In Fiscal Year 2022- 23, the City expended $72,282 of Measure M2 funds on the Senior Mobility Program. The City did not expend any Measure M2 funds for street repaving and slurry seal projects.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. However, if this report is not filed, OCTA could potentially suspend or delay M2 funding for the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. M2 Expenditure Report Resolution Fiscal Year 2022-23
2. M2 Expenditure Report Fiscal Year 2022-23
Initiated By: Caleb Brown, Accounting Manager
Submitted By: Kevin Shirah, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 10
100
ATTACHMENT 1
Item: 10
101
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA,
CONCERNING THE MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE
REPORT FOR THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds; and
WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to adopt an annual M2 Expenditure Report as part of one of the eligibility requirements; and WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to account for Net Revenues, developer/traffic impact fees, and funds expended by local jurisdiction in the M2 Expenditure Report that satisfy the Maintenance of Effort requirements; and
WHEREAS, the M2 Expenditure Report shall include all Net Revenue fund balances, interest earned and expenditures identified by type and program or project; and
WHEREAS, the M2 Expenditure Report must be adopted and submitted to the OCTA each year within six months of the end of the local jurisdiction’s fiscal year to be eligible to receive Net Revenues as part of M2.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
FOREST DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Lake Forest does hereby inform OCTA that:
a. The M2 Expenditure Report is in conformance with the template provided in the Measure M2 Eligibility Guidelines and accounts for Net Revenues including interest earned, expenditures during the fiscal year and balances at the end of fiscal year.
b. The M2 Expenditure Report is hereby adopted by the City of Lake Forest.
Item: 10
102
c. The City of Lake Forest Director of Finance is hereby authorized to sign and submit the M2 Expenditure Report to OCTA for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
DOUG CIRBO
MAYOR
ATTEST:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____
MATTHEW E. RICHARDSON
CITY ATTORNEY
Item: 10
103
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the 7th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
Item: 10
104
ATTACHMENT 2
Item: 10
105
City of Lake Forest Schedule 1
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Beginning and Ending Balances
Line
No.Description Amount Interest
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year
A-M Freeway Projects 1
2 $
$
-
-
$
$
-
-O Regional Capacity Program (RCP)
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) 3 $ - $ - Q
R
S
Local Fair Share 4
5 6
$
$
$
1,993,616 $
$
$
-
-
-
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that
connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program
-
-
T 7 $ - $ -
U 8 $ 169,556 $ -
V
W
X
Community Based Transit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
9 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 Other* -
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year
Monies Made Available During Fiscal Year
Total Monies Available (Sum Lines 13 & 14)
Expenditures During Fiscal Year
Balances at End of Fiscal Year
2,163,172
2,025,092
4,188,264
67,838
-
71,200
71,200
4,443
A-M Freeway Projects 17
18 19
20 21
22 $
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
O
P
Q
R
S
Regional Capacity Program (RCP)
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Local Fair Share 3,919,483 66,757
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
-
-
-
-
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that
connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program
Community Based Transit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
T 23 $ - $ -
U 24 $ 200,943 $ -
V
W
X
25 26
27 28
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
Other*
* Please provide a specific description
Item: 10
106
City of Lake Forest M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Sources and Uses
Schedule 2
Line
No.Description Amount Interest
Revenues:
A-M Freeway Projects 1
2 3
4 5
6 $
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
O
P
Q
R
S
Regional Capacity Program (RCP)
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Local Fair Share 1,925,867 66,757
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
-
-
-
-
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail SystemsT 7 $ - $ -
U
V
W
X
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program Community Based Transit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
Other*
8 9
10 11
12 13
$
$
$
$
$
$
97,580 $
$
$
$
$
$
4,443
-
-
-
-
-
-
-1,645
2,025,092TOTAL REVENUES (Sum lines 1 to 12)
Expenditures:
71,200
A-M Freeway Projects 14
15 16
17 18
19 $
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
O
P
Q
R
S
Regional Capacity Program (RCP)
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Local Fair Share
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program Community Based Transit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
T 20 $ - $ -
U
V
W
X
21 22
23 24
25 26
$
$
$
$
$
$
66,193 $
$
$
$
$
$
4,443
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
Other* 1,645
67,838
1,957,254
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Sum lines 14 to 25)
TOTAL BALANCE (Subtract line 26 from 13)
4,443
66,75727 $ $
* Please provide a specific description
Note: Fare revenues collected and expended under the Senior Mobility Program totaled $1,645 during the fiscal year and are reported under the Other Revenue and Other Expenditure Categories.
Item: 10
107
City of Lake Forest Schedule 3
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Streets and Roads Detailed Use of Funds
Other
M2
Interest
Line
No.
Developer /
Impact Fees+
O P Q X Other
M22Type of Expenditure MOE O P Q X Other* TOTALInterest Interest Interest Interest Indirect and/or Overhead
Construction & Right-of-Way
New Street Construction
Street Reconstruction
Signals, Safety Devices, & Street Lights
Pedestrian Ways & Bikepaths
Storm Drains
1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 3
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 5
6 Storm Damage 7
Total Construction1 8
Right of Way Acquisition
Total Construction & Right-of-Way
Maintenance
9 10
Patching 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 $
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Overlay & Sealing -
-Street Lights & Traffic Signals
Storm Damage -
Other Street Purpose Maintenance
Total Maintenance1
978,463
978,463
978,463
978,463
72,282
1,050,745
Other 66,193
66,193
4,443
4,443
1,645
1,645GRAND TOTALS (Sum Lines 1, 10, 16, 17) $ 978,463
Any California State Constitution Article XIX streets and road eligible expenditure may be “counted” in local jurisdictions’ calculation of MOE if the activity is supported (funded) by a local jurisdictions’ discretionary funds (e.g. general fund).
The California State Controller also provides useful information on Article XIX and the Streets and Highways Code eligible expenditures in its “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties”. I have reviewed and am aware of these guidelines and their applicability in calculating and reporting on Maintenance of Effort expenditures.Finance Director Confirmation 19 Finance Director initial: _______________
1 Includes direct charges for staff time Legend
2 Other M2 includes A-M, R,S,T,U,V, and W Project Description + Transportation related only A-M
O
Freeway Projects
Regional Capacity Program (RCP)* Please provide a specific description P
Q
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP) Local Fair Share
R
S
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail SystemsT
U
V
W
X
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program Community Based Transit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
Environmental Cleanup Program (Water Quality)
Item: 10
108
City of Lake Forest Schedule 4
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Local Fair Share Project List
PROJECT NAME AMOUNT EXPENDED
$ -
Item: 10
109
City of Lake Forest Signature Page
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
I hereby certify that:
☐ All the information attached herein and included in schedules 1 through 4 is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge;
☐ The interest earned on Net Revenues allocated pursuant to the Ordinance shall be expended only for those purposes for which the Net Revenues were allocated;
☐ The City of Lake Forest is aware of the State Controller’s “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties”, which is a guide for determining MOE Expenditures for M2 Eligibility purposes; ☐ The City’s Expenditure Report is in compliance with direction provided in the State Controller’s “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties;” and ☐ The City of Lake Forest has expended in this fiscal year an amount of local discretionary funds for streets and roads purposes at least equal to or exceeding the FY 2022-23 MOE benchmark dollar amount 11.
Director of Finance (Print Name) Date
Signature
11 Jurisdictions are encouraged to submit MOE eligible expenditures higher than their MOE benchmark, so that should certain expenses be ruled ineligible during an MOE audit, the local jurisdiction still has sufficient MOE expenditures to demonstrate continued achievement of the MOE benchmark.
Item: 10
110
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR STREET AND TRAFFIC ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES - TASK ORDER #10 WIDENING/REALIGNMENT OF JERONIMO ROAD AT EL TORO ROAD
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve the Fourth Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc. for On-Call Street and Traffic Services – Task Order #10 Widening/Realignment of Jeronimo Road at El Toro Road.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Fourth Amendment substantially in the form attached.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Tait & Associates, Inc. (“Tait”) provides Street and Traffic On-Call Engineering Services under a contract approved by the City Council on April 17, 2018. The three-year Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Tait (“Agreement”) allowed for two additional one-year extensions based upon performance (Attachment 1).
Tait has performed to staff’s expectations throughout the term of the Agreement.
The term of the Agreement has been extended three times via amendments and is set to expire on April 17, 2025 (Attachments 2 through 4).
Under this contract, Tait has been preparing the design for the Jeronimo Widening/Realignment at El Toro Road, a Foothill Corridor Phasing Project (“FCPP”). This project requires additional environmental, right-of-way, and traffic signal design prior to advertising the project for construction. To continue the design services and provide assistance through construction of the project, staff proposes a Fourth Amendment (Attachment 4) with Tait that would increase the not-to-exceed compensation amount by $169,060 to a total compensation of $691,060.
Item: 11
111
Staff recommends approving the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement by exercising the City Council’s discretionary authority to ensure Tait can continue providing engineering services during the property acquisition and construction phase of this project.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department utilizes on-call engineering consultants to provide public works and engineering support services on an as-needed basis. These services include engineering design services for Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) projects. On April 17, 2018, the City Council approved Professional Consultant Services Agreements with Rick Engineering Company, Tait & Associates, and Harris & Associates for on-call street and engineering services for $250,000 each. The initial term for each of the three agreements were for three years from April 18, 2018, to April 17, 2021, with the option to add two one- year extensions at the discretion of the City Council. The original contracts were intended to cover multiple years and multiple CIP projects. For each CIP project in need of engineering support services, staff solicited proposals from the three contracted firms and evaluated each based on the firms’ specific expertise, proposed cost, and availability.
The City Council’s initial approval provided the compensation required to begin utilizing these consulting services with the understanding staff would routinely bring back amendments to City Council on an as-needed basis. The City Council approved the First Amendment to the Agreement with Tait on January 5, 2021 (Attachment 2). The First Amendment increased the compensation amount by $272,000 to bring total compensation under the agreement from $250,000 to $522,000 and extended the term by one-year to April 17, 2022. The First Amendment allowed enough time and compensation to include the design of the Jeronimo Widening project and Glenn Ranch Road Resurfacing project. The City Manager approved the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Tait on March 31, 2022, extending the term by one-year to April 17, 2023 (Attachment 3). The City Council approved the Third Amendment to the Agreement with Tait on February 21, 2023, extending the term by two-years to April 17, 2025 (Attachment 4).
The Jeronimo Widening/Realignment at El Toro Road, a Foothill Corridor Phasing Project (“FCPP”), consists of widening Jeronimo Road north and south of El Toro Road to correct an existing misalignment of the through lanes. The realignment will relocate an existing block wall to accommodate the road widening to provide adequate room for traffic signal equipment and therefore requires the acquisition of additional right-of-way from the adjacent north-west property. The Subject Property is owned by EFTFTB, LLC (“Property Owner”).
Item: 11
112
Tait and their subconsultants have been working with staff on the property acquisition.
DISCUSSION:
For the City to complete the Project, additional environmental, design, and right- of-way services are required. In addition, to connect this intersection to the City’s Traffic Management Center, Tait would provide an additional traffic signal interconnect design to bring fiber optic connectivity from the intersection to City Hall.
Tait’s environmental subconsultant, the Chambers Group, would perform a California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) review and analysis including a thorough and detailed Initial Study to support, as appropriate, a Categorical Exemption (“CE”), Negative Declaration (“ND”), or Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the Jeronimo Road Widening Improvement Project. This analysis and review would include completing all aspects of environmental documentation in compliance with CEQA, which may include Responses to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”), and Findings, as well as support during public meetings.
Paragon Partners Consultants, Inc., Tait’s right-of-way/property acquisition subconsultant, would provide the additional appraisals, notifications, and documentation required to complete the right-of-way process.
TJW Engineering, Tait’s traffic engineering subconsultant, would prepare the design to provide traffic signal interconnects for the existing 22 signalized intersections along the corridors of Trabuco Road, Jeronimo Road, and El Toro Road in conjunction with the new signal work at the intersection.
Tait & Associates provided a proposal including these additional services from their subconsultants and additional design support from Tait to prepare temporary construction easement documents. The services would be performed for a total additional not to exceed fee of $169,060.
Pursuant to the City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, staff completes a vendor performance assessment during a proposed contract amendment. The chart below provides an overall summary of the contractor’s performance since its most recent amendment.
Tait & Associates, Inc. Performance Assessment
February 21, 2023 – October 2023
Category Rating
Performance of Scope of Services ☐Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very Satisfied Item: 11
113
☐ N/A
Timeliness ☐Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very Satisfied
☐ N/A
Budget Performance ☐Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very Satisfied ☐ N/A
Customer Service ☐Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very Satisfied ☐ N/A
The Finance Department prepared the proposed Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Tait & Associates (“Fourth Amendment“) and the City Attorney’s Office reviewed the document as to form. Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed amendment to allow Tait to continue to provide engineering services for the completion of the Jeronimo Widening/Realignment project.
The proposed Fourth Amendment would increase total contract compensation by $169,060. The term of the agreement would remain the same and would maintain the current contractual hourly rates to allow for the completion of the Jeronimo Widening/Realignment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Tait & Associates would increase total contract compensation by $169,060, for a total compensation of $691,060. The Fourth Amendment would maintain the current contractual hourly rates. The 2023-25 Capital Improvement Program Budget has sufficient funds available for the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc.
2. First Amendment to Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc.
3. Second Amendment to Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc.
4. Third Amendment to Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc.
5. Fourth Amendment to Agreement with Tait & Associates, Inc.
Initiated By: Douglas Erdman, Assistant City Engineer
Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 11
114
Attachment 1
Item: 11
115
Item: 11
116
Item: 11
117
Item: 11
118
Item: 11
119
Item: 11
120
Item: 11
121
Item: 11
122
Item: 11
123
Item: 11
124
Item: 11
125
Item: 11
126
Item: 11
127
Item: 11
128
Item: 11
129
Item: 11
130
Item: 11
131
Item: 11
132
Item: 11
133
Item: 11
134
Item: 11
135
Item: 11
136
Item: 11
137
Item: 11
138
Item: 11
139
Item: 11
140
Attachment 2
Item: 11
141
Item: 11
142
Item: 11
143
Item: 11
144
Item: 11
145
Item: 11
146
Item: 11
147
Attachment 3
Item: 11
148
Item: 11
149
Item: 11
150
Attachment 4
Item: 11
151
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 1 -
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PARTIES AND DATE.
This Third Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services (“Third Amendment”) is entered into on the [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***] , [***INSERT YEAR***], by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with it s principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (“City”) and Tait & Associates, Inc., a California corporation, with its principal place of business at 701 N. Park Center Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92705 ("Consultant").
City and Consultant are sometimes individually refe rred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
RECITALS.
2.1 Agreement. The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Street and Traffic Engineering Services dated April 17, 2018 (“Agreement”).
2.2 First Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain First Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement, increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement, and amend the scope of services, dated December 22, 2020 (“First Amendment”).
2.3 Second Amendment. The Parties entere d into that certain Second Amendment to extend the term of the agreement and update th e Delivery of Notices, dated March 31, 2022 (“Second Amendment”).
2.4 Third Amendment. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement.
TERMS.
3.1 Term. Section 3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be from April 18, 2018 to April 17, 2025, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
3.2 Remaining Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Third Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Item: 11
152
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 2 -
CITY OF LAKE FOREST TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By: [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
Doug Cirbo
Mayor
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]
Jake Vandervis
Vice President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:
By: [CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]
Jason Jones
Treasurer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: [CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Item: 11
153
Attachment 5
Item: 11
154
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 1 -
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services (“Fourth Amendment”) is entered into on the [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***] , [***INSERT YEAR***], by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (“City”) and Tait & Associates, Inc., a California corporation, with its principal place of business at 701 N. Park Center Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92705 ("Consultant").
City and Consultant are someti mes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
2. RECITALS.
2.1 Agreement. The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Street and Traffic Engineering Services dated April 17, 2018 (“Agreement”).
2.2 First Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain First Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement, increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement, and amend the scope of services, dated December 22, 2020 (“First Amendment”).
2.3 Second Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain Second Amendment to extend the term of the agreement and update the Delivery of Notices, dated March 31, 2022 (“Second Amendment”).
2.4 Third Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain Third Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement, dated March 8, 2023 (“Third Amendment”).
2.5 Fourth Amendment. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to amend the scope of services and increase the total compensation under the Agreement.
TERMS.
3.1 Compensation. Section 3.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Consultant s hall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed SIX
HUNDRED NINETY -ONE THOUSAND SIXTY DOLLARS
($691,060) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7AB62517-9071-4007-A9C0-FFC197D60F23 Item: 11
155
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 2 -
3.2 Extra Work. The Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit “A” of the Agreement is hereby amendment to include the Services set forth in Attachment 1 to this Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
3.3 Remaining Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Fourth Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST TAIT &ASSOCIATES, INC.
By: [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
Doug Cirbo
Mayor
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]
Jake Vandervis
Vice President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:
By: [CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]
Jason Jones
Treasurer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: [CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7AB62517-9071-4007-A9C0-FFC197D60F23 Item: 11
156
55136.00200\31919338.1 Attachment “1”-1
ATTACHMENT “1” TO FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOURTH AMENDMENT:
ASA1: JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING PROJECT ADDED ENVIRONMENTAL, ROW, AND
TRAFFIC SERVICES
Consultant shall provide the following support and consulting services for the project.
ASA1A – CEQA SUPPORT (IS/CE OR IS/MND)
CEQA support services on this contract will be provided by Chambers Group. Technical details of the CEQA support services and the approach to the task are detailed in the Chambers Group proposal which has been provided as part of this proposal as Attachment A to the Consultant’s Proposal for the project. Based on the findings of the project, this task includes two potential options for CEQA Determination:
1) Initial Study with Categorical Exemption Determination 2) Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration
The proposed sub-consultant fee for Chambers group includes the full cost of the likely IS/MND scope, however, also allows for and details the potential lower cost alternative of IS/CE should the initial findings and review determine the viability of the given alternative. In addition to Chamber Group fees, TAIT has also account for project management hours required to guide and provide details, feedback, and meetings along the course for the CEQA review process.
Deliverables: IS/CE or IS/MND
ASA1B – EMINENT DOMAIN SUPPORT
Eminent Domain Support services on this contract will be provided by Paragon Consultants (Paragon). Technical details of the eminent domain support services and the approach to the task are detailed in the Paragon proposal which has been provided as part of this proposal as Attachment B to the Consultant’s Proposal for the project.
In addition to Paragon fees, TAIT has also account for project management and design support hours that are anticipated to be required during the eminent domain process to accommodate added meetings, design support responses, and coordination of incidental elements in relation to the eminent domain process.
Deliverables: Eminent Domain Documents
ASA1C – TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT PLAN
Traffic Engineering Services on this contract will be provided by TJW. Technical details of the added Traffic Engineering Services and the approach to the task are detailed in the TJW DocuSign Envelope ID: 7AB62517-9071-4007-A9C0-FFC197D60F23 Item: 11
157
55136.00200\31919338.1 Attachment “1”-2
proposal which has been provided as part of this proposal as Attachment C to the Consultant’s Proposal for the project.
In addition to TJW fees, TAIT has also account for project management hours as well as design support hours to update the current design package to capture the added sheets and references.
Deliverables: Traffic Signal Interconnect Plans
ASA1D – TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTOIN EASEMENT LEGAL & PLAT
It is anticipated that a temporary construction easement may be requested by the property owner in lieu of providing a right of entry. Should one be required, TAIT will activate this task in order to prepare a single temporary construction easement legal and plat as will be negotiated as part of task ASA1B. This task includes the hours for survey mapping and legal description only and it is assumed that the City Attorney will be responsible for preparing the necessary easement agreement document for which TAIT’s legal and plat will be referenced as an exhibit.
Deliverables: Temporary Construction Legal Description & Plat ASA1E – OPTIONAL TASK – ADDITIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES If, during the property negotiations, it is determined that a re-design and alignment of the wall is beneficial for the purpose of the land acquisition process to proceed, TAIT has included this alternate task to provide such additional design services. This task is budgetary and is assumed to include a re-design and grading of the private wall as well as on-site grading that will be required to join existing conditions. It does not include any additionally requested landscaping design, expansion of grading/impacts on site, or drainage improvements that may be added. This task will not be billed to unless separately authorized by the City. Each additional task will be individually estimated and proposed on based on TAIT’s estimated hours and rate schedule. Upon city approval of the anticipated design cost, TAIT will initiate the requested additional design.
Deliverables: As-Needed Design Revisions.
ASSUMPTIONS
This scope of work is based on the following key assumptions:
Design of the Jeronimo Road Improvements will not be modified or require additional design in support of the above noted tasks
Landscape Architecture design or additional wall design/modifications to the currently proposed alignment and nature of wall are not included or assumed to be required. Additional Mapping/Easements (if requested during Eminent Domain Proceedings) are not included
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7AB62517-9071-4007-A9C0-FFC197D60F23 Item: 11
158
55136.00200\31919338.1 Attachment “2”-1
ATTACHMENT “2” TO FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
EXHIBIT “C”
COMPENSATION
Consultant shall be paid for services in accordance with Section3.3 of the Agreement and as described above under Exhibit “A” Scope of Services and the not to exceed fee of Six Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Sixty Dollars ($691,060). Compensation for work shall be paid per the rates included in the original Agreement.
FOURTH AMENDMENT:
Compensation for work under the fourth amendment shall be paid per the following schedule and terms.
Task No. Task Description
Not to
Exceed
Fee
ASA1A CEQA Support (IS/CE or IS/MND) $70,640
IS/CE Option Estimate [$31,639]
IS/MND Option Estimate [$62,415]
ASA1B Eminent Domain Support $33,380
ASA1C Traffic Signal Interconnect Plan $41,140
ASA1D Temporary Construction Easement Legal & Platt $3,820 ASA1E Optional Task - Additional Design Engineering Support Services $20,080 ASA1 SUB-TOTAL $169,060
REIMBURSABLES $0
ASA1 TOTAL FEE
(Fourth Amendment Additional Compensation) $169,060
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7AB62517-9071-4007-A9C0-FFC197D60F23 Item: 11
159
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
DEPARTMENT City Manager
SUBJECT:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH RALPH ANDERSEN &
ASSOCIATES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTING SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Ralph Andersen & Associates for Human Resources Consulting Services.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk attest to, the agreement with Ralph Andersen & Associates, substantially in the form attached.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On November 16, 2019, the City Manager approved a three-year contract with Ralph Andersen & Associates (“RAA”) for human resources consulting services (“Agreement”). The agreement allows for two additional one-year extensions based upon performance and the discretion of the City Council. Since inception, RAA has provided various human resources consulting services for the City, including the recruitment of three management level positions. On May 9, 2022, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Agreement which extended the term to November 16, 2023, and increased the total compensation amount from $100,000 to $160,000.
The proposed Second Amendment would extend the term of the Agreement to November 15, 2024, and increase the compensation by $30,000 to $190,000.
The term extension and associated compensation increase is requested based on the City’s projected human resources consulting needs for the remainder of the current fiscal year and projected needs for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The Second Amendment to the RAA Agreement was prepared by the Finance Department, has been reviewed by the City Attorney and is approved as to form. Sufficient funds are available in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget to cover the costs of the recommended action.
Item: 12
160
2 8
1 5
BACKGROUND:
On July 22, 2019, the City Manager approved a Request for Proposal for professional human resources consulting services and authorized staff to solicit proposals. After a competitive process, the City Manager awarded a three-year agreement in the amount of $100,000 to RAA for human resources consulting services (Attachment 1). The original Agreement provided an initial term from November 16, 2019, to November 15, 2022, with two optional one-year extensions based on performance and at the discretion of the City Council. The City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines authorize the City Manager to approve agreements for professional services, after a formal procurement process, up to $50,000 per year for three years.
The RAA Agreement includes but is not limited to the following human resource consulting service areas:
Organizational Design
•Review and evaluate the adequacy of staffing levels in each department including the use of contract vs. in-house employees.
Biennial Compensation Study
•Perform a comprehensive study of City job classifications to ensure all positions are graded appropriately with respect to internal equity and are fairly compensated with respect to local public employment markets.
Recruitments
•Conduct executive searches and other high-level recruitments from identification of potential candidates through
comprehensive background investigations.
Job Descriptions and Salary Ranges
•Prepare job descriptions and assign appropriate salary ranges DISCUSSION:
The original RAA Agreement included a compensation amount of $100,000 and assumed a basic level of human resources consulting services consisting of routine updates to existing studies, projects, programs, and policies. This compensation amount was determined based upon past experience and historical levels of funding. While RAA has provided consulting services in those areas, they have also provided executive recruitment services for key technical positions that are historically difficult to fill. On May 9, 2022, the City Council approved the first optional one-year extension by authorizing the First Amendment to Item: 12
161
2 8
1 5
the Agreement (“First Amendment”). The First Amendment extended the term of the Agreement with RAA to November 16, 2023, and increased the total compensation amount from $100,000 to $160,000 (Attachment 2).
The proposed Second Amendment to the RAA Agreement would increase compensation by $30,000 for a revised total not to exceed compensation amount of $190,000 (Attachment 3). The Second Amendment would also extend the term of the Agreement to November 15, 2024, thereby exercising the second of the two optional one-year term extensions.
Staff believes RAA’s performance met or exceeded the Agreement scope of work relative to the responsibilities associated with human resources consulting services. Throughout the term of the Agreement, RAA demonstrated their willingness to respond to questions and consistently completed all required tasks in a quick and professional manner. Table 1 below provides an overall summary of the consultant’s performance since November 16, 2022, through the most recent calendar month.
Table 1: Ralph Andersen & Associates Performance Review Ralph Andersen & Associates – Performance Review
November 16, 2022 to November 1, 2023
Category Unsatisfied – Very Satisfied
Performance of Scope of Services ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A Timeliness ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A Budget Performance ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A Customer Service ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A The proposed Second Amendment was prepared by the Finance Department and has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to form. Staff recommends the City Council authorize the proposed Second Amendment to the RAA Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of the recommended action will result in an additional $30,000 in compensation authorized to be paid to RAA for human resources consulting services. The Second Amendment does not increase contractual rates.
Sufficient funds are available in the 2023-25 Operating Budget to cover the costs of the recommended action.
Item: 12
162
2 8
1 5
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Ralph Andersen and Associates
2. First Amendment to the Agreement with Ralph Andersen & Associates
3. Proposed Second Amendment to the Agreement with Ralph Andersen & Associates
Initiated By: Shelly Cisneros, Human Resources Manager
Submitted By: Keith Neves, Assistant City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 12
163
Attachment 1
Item: 12
164
Item: 12
165
Item: 12
166
Item: 12
167
Item: 12
168
Item: 12
169
Item: 12
170
Item: 12
171
Item: 12
172
Item: 12
173
Item: 12
174
Item: 12
175
Item: 12
176
Item: 12
177
Item: 12
178
Item: 12
179
Item: 12
180
Item: 12
181
Item: 12
182
Item: 12
183
Item: 12
184
Attachment 2
Item: 12
185
Item: 12
186
Item: 12
187
Item: 12
188
ATTACHMENT 3
Item: 12
189
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 1 -
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PARTIES AND DATE.
This Second Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services (“Second Amendment”) is entered into on the ____ day of ________, 20___, by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (“City”) and Ralph Andersen & Associates, a California corporation, with its principal place of business at 5800 Stanford Ranch Road, Suite 410, Rocklin, California 95765 ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." RECITALS.
2.1 Agreement. The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Human Resources Consulting Services dated November 16, 2019 (“Agreement”).
2.2 First Amendment. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement , increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement, and update the Delivery of Notices dated May 9, 2022 (“First Amendment”).
2.3 Second Amendment. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement.
TERMS.
3.1 Term. Section 3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be from November 16, 2019 to November 15, 2024, unless earlier terminated as provided herein.
Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
3.2 Compensation. Section 3.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed ONE HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($ 190,000) without
written approval of the City Council or City Manager as applicable.
Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if DocuSign Envelope ID: AFE80A8C-490F-4B53-8B3E-265574478C14 Item: 12
190
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 2 -
authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.3 Remaining Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Second Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES
By:
Doug Cirbo
Mayor
By:
Heather Renschler
President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:
By:
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By:
Heather Renschler
Chief Financial Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
DocuSign Envelope ID: AFE80A8C-490F-4B53-8B3E-265574478C14 Item: 12
191
55136.00200\31919338.1 Attachment “1”-1
ATTACHMENT “1” TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION
Consultant shall be paid for serviced rendered in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement and as described above under Exhibit “A” Scope of Services, the not to exceed fee of one hundred ninety thousand dollars ($190,000) billed utilizing the following rates.
Fixed Fee Rates for Executive and Partial Executive Recruitments Task Fee
Executive Recruitment $30,000
Partial Executive Recruitment $20,000
Specific terms of each recruitment and determination on type of recruitment (Executive or Partial Executive) to be agreed upon by the City and Consultant.
Hourly Rates for Tasks Completed on a Time and Materials Basis Classification Hourly Rate
Project Manager $135
Senior/Principal Consultant $120
Staff Consultant $105
DocuSign Envelope ID: AFE80A8C-490F-4B53-8B3E-265574478C14 Item: 12
192
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUBJECT:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 6.12 – PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, REVISING SECTION 6.14.002 – PUBLIC NUISANCES DESIGNATED, AND ADDING SECTION 6.14.017 –
DEFINITIONS, TO THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE (CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 17, 2023, CITY COUNCIL MEETING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Introduce for first reading an Ordinance Entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER
6.12 – PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, REVISING SECTION 6.14.002 – PUBLIC NUISANCES DESIGNATED, AND ADDING SECTION 6.14.017 –
DEFINITIONS, TO THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE, AND FINDING THE
ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15061(B)(3)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This item is a staff-initiated ordinance adding a new Property Maintenance chapter to the Lake Forest Municipal Code (“LFMC”), amending the Nuisances section, and adding corresponding definitions. The proposed ordinance is intended to promote public health, safety, and welfare by proactively addressing conditions that may be detrimental to the community in accordance with General Plan Policy 2.3, which encourages the City to proactively address housing and neighborhood conditions that may be detrimental to public health.
The LFMC currently contains a chapter on nuisances (Chapter 6.14). However, the existing nuisance code does not address numerous conditions that are adverse to public health, safety and welfare, and which are better classified as property maintenance conditions. This code amendment adds a property maintenance section, adds to and revises the list of conditions deemed a nuisance, clarifies and refines standards, and adds definitions. Specifically, the draft ordinance includes:
1. New chapter 6.12 – Property Maintenance
2. Revisions to section 16.14.002 – Public Nuisances Designated
3. New section 6.14.017 – Definitions
Item: 13
193
2 7
2 7
The draft ordinance also reclassifies numerous conditions as property maintenance violations, rather than nuisances, and expands the list of conditions that constitute violations to provide code enforcement the authority to address the most common complaints received. In addition, the ordinance addresses ambiguities in the current code with more precise language and new definitions.
The ordinance was prepared with reference to the International Property Maintenance Code and in consultation with the City Attorney's Office.
The intent of the ordinance is to facilitate code enforcement, help preserve property values and quality, and mitigate conditions that could lead to blight. The benefits include:
•Standards that can be applied to commercial and residential property; •Addresses public concerns, particularly for renters or those who do not have a say in the maintenance of their residence or business premises; •Helps maintain and improve property values;
•Addresses dangerous and dilapidated buildings/structures •Prevents blight.
Staff recommends the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance for first reading (Attachment 1). If introduced tonight, the City Council would have the opportunity to consider final approval of the proposed ordinance at the November 21, 2023, City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND:
Code Enforcement officers currently utilize LFMC Chapter 6.14 – Nuisances, General as a property maintenance enforcement tool. However, this code section has not been updated in several years and lacks certain useful provisions. Presently, property maintenance standards used by Code Enforcement are dispersed across multiple codes, including the California Residential Code, California Health and Safety Code, California Fire Code, and various sections of the LFMC. This scattered arrangement of codes and standards makes compliance efforts more challenging for code enforcement, residents, property owners, and business owners.
In many instances, the codes cited for property maintenance violations are more suitable for regulation of construction or land use. For example, the California Building Standards Code (“CBSC”) provides standards for construction of walls but does not address peeling paint. The CBSC also does not require that parking lot pavement be maintained free of cracks and potholes, or that stall striping not be faded. Moreover, the standards contained in the CBSC tend to be overly technical and intended for engineers, architects, and other design professionals, rather than property and business owners. An additional challenge is that the referenced codes often lack appropriate standards and regulations for Item: 13
194
2 7
2 7
addressing many of the property maintenance issues commonly encountered in the city.
Presently, Lake Forest is one of only six Orange County cities that have not adopted either a standalone property maintenance code, such as the International Property Maintenance Code ("IPMC"), or a property maintenance chapter in its municipal code. As Lake Forest transitions to a maintenance- oriented city, it becomes increasingly important to equip Code Enforcement with the tools and regulations necessary to ensure a basic level of property maintenance.
DISCUSSION:
Property maintenance and nuisance issues are the basis for most code enforcement activity in the city, as well as the subject of most complaints received from the public. Property maintenance issues can manifest as unsanitary or hazardous conditions at one end of the spectrum and as an eyesore for neighbors and passersby at the other. Without active enforcement and proper enforcement tools, deferred maintenance conditions can proliferate in neighborhoods and contribute to blight that is difficult to reverse. Ensuring a basic level of property maintenance and minimizing public nuisances is critical to maintaining property values and the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
It is essential that Code Enforcement and the City Attorney's office have the proper tools to effectively address property maintenance issues. The tool most helpful in this regard is a set of clear, concise, and comprehensive regulations that address the most common maintenance issues. Regulations should be practical and legally enforceable. In Lake Forest, this can be achieved with regulations that are consolidated and focused on maintenance, rather than new construction, remodeling, or repairs.
In December 2022, as part of the triennial update of the California Building Standards Code, staff initially proposed adoption of the International Property Maintenance Code ("IPMC") as a means to enhance code enforcement authority.
As noted in the Background section of this report, the IPMC has been widely adopted by Orange County cities, as well as throughout California and nationally.
However, after further evaluation and feedback from the City Council, staff prepared a custom-to-Lake Forest property maintenance code section that borrows from the IPMC but is more concise, uses simpler language, and eliminates references to other codes not used in Lake Forest (e.g., the International Plumbing Code).
Staff also drafted revisions to the City's existing nuisance regulations (LFMC section 6.14.002) and added a list of definitions as a new section 6.14.017. The Item: 13
195
2 7
2 7
definitions minimize ambiguity, thereby rendering the standards more enforceable and protected from legal challenge. The draft property maintenance regulations, nuisance code revisions, and definitions are provided as an attachment to this report (Attachment 1).
Because violation notices issued by Code Enforcement typically cite applicable code sections, the draft ordinance would facilitate notices to property owners that are easier to understand. This, in turn, will facilitate compliance and avoid complications from vague or ambiguous notices. In many instances, code enforcement cases are settled in court, where judges look to the code sections cited to determine if the condition described in the notice constitutes a clear violation of law. If adopted, the revised and new code sections would help ensure Code Enforcement and the City Attorney's office are effectively able to utilize codified regulations to address the most common property maintenance and nuisance issues.
Attachment 2 lists each proposed code section and its origin or basis. For example, some sections were derived from existing provisions in one or more chapters of the LFMC and synthesized or reworded as succinct property maintenance standards. In other instances, conditions that currently constitute a Code violation based on one or more existing LFMC sections were simply designated a nuisance. Other proposed code sections are based on standards in the IPMC, the California Building Code, the California Health & Safety Code, or another California code.
New Chapter- 6.12 - Property Maintenance
The draft ordinance includes provisions that address the following property maintenance conditions:
•graffiti
•building exteriors and painted
surfaces
•walls and fences
•driveway and parking lot
pavement, signage, and
striping
•tarpaulin as coverings for
inoperative vehicles and other
stored items in public view
•"E-Z up" canopies in front
yards and parking lots
•light fixtures and support
poles Conditions not adequately addressed by current
Code (vegetation, trash bins, inoperative vehicles)
Item: 13
196
2 7
2 7
•windows and window screens in multi-family residential units •commercial signage
•dead or overgrown vegetation
•rodents and vermin
•address numerals required to support emergency response/ public safety •swimming pool water and fencing
•temporary wiring and lighting
•mechanical equipment and plumbing
•inoperable vehicles, trash bins/dumpsters, and storage pods Revision to Section 16.14.002 – Public Nuisances Designated LFMC section 6.14.002 – Public Nuisances, Designated, identifies conditions that constitute a public nuisance and a violation of law in the City. The draft ordinance designates the conditions listed below as a public nuisance. In all but one instance, provisions deleted from section 6.14.002 were added to the property maintenance code as a more appropriate classification.
The draft ordinance removes
"Use of parked or stored
recreational vehicles . . . as
temporary or permanent
living space" from the list of
nuisances based on
guidance from the City
Attorney's Office and for
consistency with recent case
law1. Certain other
provisions listed in the draft
property maintenance code
section are currently
identified as nuisances in the
LFMC and were reclassified
as property maintenance
violations.
Updated List of Nuisances:
•Failure to secure and prevent access by unauthorized persons to vacant or abandoned property and/or structures
•Abandoned, disregarded, or unused objects or equipment •Stagnant water
1 Desertrain v. City of Los Angles (9th Cir. 2014) and Bloom v. City of San Diego (S.D. Cal. 2018).
Condition not addressed by current Code (inoperable vehicle) Item: 13
197
2 7
2 7
•Commercial shipping/ storage containers on a residential property for more than 14 consecutive days, except for a maximum of 90 days in conjunction with an active building permit
•Storage of construction equipment visible from the public right-of-way in a residential zone, except during construction with a permit •Parking, storing, or maintaining abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperable vehicle on any residential property, where the vehicle is visible from the public right-of-way
•Habitable structures failing to provide and maintain light, ventilation, and space conditions in compliance with the requirements of the California Building Code and California Residential Code
•Garages, kitchens, and other non-habitable spaces used for sleeping purposes, or as any other habitable space
•A condition such that a bedroom constitutes the only means of access to other bedrooms or habitable spaces, and/or is the only means of egress from other habitable spaces
•Absent, unsafe, or obstructed continuous path of travel from any point in a building or structure to the public way
•Non-operational, defective, or absent fire protection, detection, and life safety systems required by code
•The keeping of bees or livestock on any residential property, except for up to 4 hens
•Any pest breeding hazard
•Trailers, campers, boats, or motor vehicles parked or stored on vacant property or in front yards of developed lots, except on a Code-compliant and paved driveway
New Section 6.14.017 – Definitions
The draft ordinance adds definitions as a new LFMC section 6.14.017 for the following terms used in the draft updated version of section 6.14.002:
•commercial bins •infestation
•commercial vehicle •inoperable vehicle
•habitable space •residential uses
•hen •vehicle
•hoarding or hoarding conditions •vacant property
The added definitions minimize ambiguity for Code Enforcement and the public and enhance the City's ability to enforce nuisance standards. Furthermore, the Item: 13
198
2 7
2 7
definitions protect the City from legal challenges to enforcement proceedings on the basis that terms used in the LFMC are vague or subject to interpretation.
The draft ordinance establishes a minimum maintenance standard for each item listed. For example, potholes, broken windows, dead vegetation, and faulty wiring would constitute a violation of the LFMC.
SUMMARY:
The draft ordinance was prepared in coordination with the City Attorney's Office.
Adoption and implementation of the draft ordinance would provide a consistent and uniform approach to property maintenance, facilitate code enforcement, help preserve property values and quality, and promote public health, safety, and welfare. The ordinance provides standards and regulations that are more easily understood, easier to enforce, and more comprehensive than the current regulatory framework. Staff recommends the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance for first reading (Attachment 1). If introduced tonight, the City Council will have the opportunity to consider final approval of the proposed ordinance at the November 21, 2023, City Council meeting.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Approval of the draft ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15061(b)(3)). The Ordinance does not authorize any development or other activity that could result in a significant effect on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adoption of the draft ordinance carries no fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Ordinance Regulating Property Maintenance
2. Code Origin Matrix
Initiated By: Ron Santos, Senior Planner; Winston Karuga, Senior Code Enforcement Officer
Submitted By: Gayle Ackerman, AICP, Director of Community Development Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 13
199
55136.00450\41520901.8
-1-
5 2
6 7
4 ATTACHMENT
Item: 13
200
55136.00450\41520901.8
-2-
5 2
6 7
4 ORDINANCE NO. __
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 6.12 –
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, REVISING SECTION 6.14.002 –
PUBLIC NUISANCES DESIGNATED, AND ADDING SECTION
6.14.017 – DEFINITIONS, TO THE LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL
CODE, AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15061(B)(3)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Cal. Const. Art. XI, Sec. 7 and under the City’s general police powers, the City of Lake Forest (“City”) is empowered and charged with responsibility for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish comprehensive property maintenance standards and updated public nuisance regulations to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. This ordinance (“Ordinance”) amends the Lake Forest Municipal Code to establish such standards and regulations; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2023, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing to consider the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on October 17, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on the draft ordinance, at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the Ordinance, and continued the item to the November 7, 2023, regular City Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites relating to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Recitals above are true and correct and incorporated as findings herein.
SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council determines that adoption of the Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal.
Code Regs., § 15061(b)(3).) The Ordinance does not authorize any development or other activity that could result in a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, the City Item: 13
201
55136.00450\41520901.8
-3-
5 2
6 7
4 Council hereby directs City staff to file a Notice of Exemption within five days of the adoption of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. General Plan. Based on the entire record before the City Council, and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the Ordinance’s amendments to the LFMC are consistent with the City’s adopted General Plan. Specifically, this Ordinance is consistent with Health and Wellness Element Policy 2.3, which encourages the City to proactively address housing and neighborhood conditions that may be detrimental to public health. Research by City staff indicates that such conditions can include improperly maintained housing and real property, public nuisances (such as abandoned items, hoarding, inoperable vehicles), and unsafe structures. This Ordinance improves the City's ability to address these conditions, each of which may be detrimental to public health and safety. For these reasons, adoption of the Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan.
SECTION 4. Code Amendment – Addition of Chapter 6.12. Chapter 6.12 – “Property Maintenance,” is hereby added to the Lake Forest Municipal Code, to read in its entirety as follows:
“6.12 Property Maintenance.
6.12.010 Property Maintenance Requirements
All developed real property in the City shall be maintained at a level not less than the following standards:
A.Graffiti. All structures, equipment, walls, and fencing on the property shall be maintained free of graffiti pursuant to Chapter 6.14 Article II of this code.
B.Building exteriors. Exterior building surfaces shall be maintained free of significant surface cracks, missing materials, warping, and dry rot which either threaten the structural integrity or result in a dilapidated appearance.
C.Paint. Painted surfaces on buildings, trash enclosures, walls, retaining walls, fences, and structures shall be maintained and free of decay, cracking, peeling, chalking, dry rot, warping, or termite infestation.
D.Walls and fences. All walls (including retaining and crib walls), fences abutting public rights-of-way (including alleys) and trash enclosures shall be maintained free of surface cracks, dry rot, warping, deterioration, leaning, missing panels or blocks, which either threaten the structural integrity or result in a dilapidated appearance.
E.Parking areas, sidewalks.
1. Privately owned driveways, parking areas, alleys, sidewalks, and walkways shall be maintained free of potholes, cracks, breaks, lifting, and other deteriorated conditions.
Item: 13
202
55136.00450\41520901.8
-4-
5 2
6 7
4 2. All required parking lot striping, markings, signage, and wheel stops shall be maintained free of deteriorated conditions.
F.Stairs and walking surfaces. Every stair, ramp, landing, balcony, porch, deck, or other walking surface shall be maintained in good repair.
G.Use of plastic coverings. Plastic coverings such as tarpaulin for roof and building repairs shall be prohibited, except for a maximum of 30 days for emergency repairs. Additionally, the use of tarpaulin for vehicle covers, or temporary canopies, enclosures, and/or awnings is prohibited in any outdoor area visible from any public right- of-way.
H.Canopies. Any canopy located on a residential property shall be partially or wholly screened from the public right-of-way by either a building and/or a solid, opaque wall or fence that is a minimum of six feet in height. The canopy shall be maintained in good condition and shall be removed, cleaned, or replaced if torn, faded, or dirty.
I.Lighting. All exterior light fixtures shall be maintained in good working order free of broken lamps, lenses, and light bulbs. Furthermore, the structural integrity of all supporting poles and mounting fixtures shall be maintained. All insulation and connections shall be intact and free of exposed wire.
J.Windows.
1. Every window, skylight, and door frame shall be kept in good repair, and weathertight. Glazing materials shall be maintained free from cracks and holes.
Broken windows and glass doors are prohibited.
2. Use of materials other than glass as a replacement or covering of windowpanes is prohibited for longer than 30 days, whereupon replacement windowpanes compliant with the requirements of the California Building Standards Code shall be installed.
K.Window screens. All window and glass door screens shall be maintained free of tears, rips, and holes. On residential rental properties, window screens are required on all windows.
L.Signs. All signs shall be maintained to prevent deterioration, disrepair, and unsightliness. All illuminated signs must be maintained in proper working order.
M.Excavations. Excavations, abandoned wells, shafts, basements, and other holes shall be properly secured to prevent access by unauthorized persons.
N.Landscaping.
1. All unpaved areas requiring landscaping shall be landscaped.
Landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy condition free of dying, dead, diseased, Item: 13
203
55136.00450\41520901.8
-5-
5 2
6 7
4 decayed, discarded, and/or overgrown vegetation. Landscaping shall be maintained consistent with section 9.144.060.2 of this Code.
2. The public parkway shall be landscaped and maintained by the adjacent property owner(s). The landscaping, including trees, shall be maintained in a healthy condition free of dying, dead, diseased, decayed, discarded, and/or overgrown vegetation.
3. Landscape shall be maintained so as not to cause an obstruction to the public right-of-way, the vision of motorists or a hazardous condition to property, pedestrians, or vehicle traffic. Trees and other such vegetation shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet above roadway surfaces and 7 feet above sidewalk and footpath surfaces.
O.Trash containers.
1. On multi-family residential properties and in commercial and industrial zones, trash bins and dumpsters shall at all times, with the exception of collection day, be stored within a City-approved trash enclosure and screened from public view.
2. In residential zones, with the exception of collection day, trash bins shall be stored out of view from the public right of way.
3. Overflowing trash bins or dumpsters are prohibited.
4. Trash bins shall always remain covered with an approved lid.
P.Roofs. Roofs and flashing shall be maintained in good repair and not have defects that admit rain. Roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent dampness or deterioration in the walls or interior portion of the structure. Roof drains, gutters, and downspouts shall be maintained in good repair and free from obstructions. Roof water shall not be discharged in a manner that creates a public nuisance.
Q.Rodent and vermin control. Consistent with state and local law, including but not limited to California Health and Safety Code section 116125 et seq. and Chapter
6.28 of this Code, the interiors of structures and exterior property shall be kept free from rodent harborage and infestation of pests (including but not limited to, bed bugs, roaches, lice, fleas, and ticks). Where rodents or pests are found, they shall be promptly exterminated by processes that will not be injurious to human health and which are in full compliance with all local, state, and federal law. After pest elimination, proper precautions shall be taken to prevent future harborage and reinfestation.
R.Drainage. Onsite drainage shall be maintained to prevent deterioration, disrepair, and ineffectiveness.
S.Address numerals. Each building and unit on a property shall have approved address numbers placed in a position to be plainly legible and visible from the Item: 13
204
55136.00450\41520901.8
-6-
5 2
6 7
4 street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background.
Identification of individual units shall be provided adjacent to the unit entrances. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters. Numbers shall be not less than 4 inches (102 mm) in height with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm).
T.Swimming pools.
1. Swimming pool and spa water shall be maintained in a clean and clear condition, free of algae, insects, and debris. The floor of the pool shall be clearly visible.
2. Barrier fencing and gates for swimming pools and spas shall be maintained as required by the California Residential Code.
U.Electrical equipment.
1. Raceways, cable assemblies, boxes, cabinets, fittings, and other electrical wiring, equipment, and appliances shall be properly installed and maintained in accordance with the California Electrical Code.
2. Wiring not approved by the California Electrical Code shall not be used for running through doors, windows, or cabinets, or concealed within walls, floors, ceilings, or as otherwise prohibited.
3. Temporary wiring for uses such as holiday lights shall be installed in a safe manner. The use of temporary wiring for electrical power and lighting installations shall not exceed a period of 90 days.
V.Mechanical equipment.
1. Mechanical equipment, appliances, fireplaces, solid fuel-burning appliances, cooking appliances, and water heating appliances shall be properly installed and maintained in a safe working condition and shall be capable of safely performing their intended function.
2. Dwellings shall be provided with the required heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 65°F (18°C) in all habitable rooms, bathrooms, and toilet rooms. The required room temperatures shall be measured 3 feet (914 mm) above the floor near the center of the room and 2 feet (610 mm) inward from the center of each exterior wall.
3. Cooking appliances shall not be used, nor shall portable unvented fuel-burning space heaters be used, to provide required heating. Portable space heaters may not be used to achieve compliance with this section.
W.Plumbing equipment
Item: 13
205
55136.00450\41520901.8
-7-
5 2
6 7
4 1. Plumbing fixtures shall be properly installed and maintained in working order, and shall be kept free from obstructions, leaks, and defects, and shall further be capable of performing the function for which such plumbing fixtures are designed. Plumbing fixtures shall be maintained in a safe, sanitary, and functional condition per the California Plumbing Code.
2. Every dwelling unit shall contain its own bathtub or shower, lavatory, water closet, and kitchen sink, which shall be maintained in a sanitary, safe working condition. A kitchen sink shall not be used as a substitute for the required lavatory.
3. Water heating facilities shall be properly installed and maintained per the California Plumbing Code. They must be capable of providing an adequate amount of water to be drawn at every required sink, lavatory, bathtub, shower, and laundry facility at a temperature not less than 110°F (43°C).”
SECTION 5. Code Amendment – Amendment to Section 6.14.002. Section
6.14.002 – "Public Nuisances Designated" of the Lake Forest Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“6.14.002 Public Nuisances Designated.
It is unlawful and declared to be a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any property within the City, to cause, permit, allow, or maintain the property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon:
A. Any violation of any section of the Lake Forest Municipal Code, including any code adopted by reference;
B. Buildings or structures which are partially destroyed, boarded up, abandoned or permitted to remain in a state of partial construction for more than six months, and any period of extension, after the expiration of a building permit; C. Land, the topography or configuration of which, in any man-made state, whether as a result of grading operations, excavations, fill, or other alteration, interferes with the City-approved drainage pattern over the property or from adjoining or other properties which does or may result in erosion, subsidence, or surface water drainage programs of such magnitude as to be injurious to public health, safety, and welfare or to neighboring properties;
D. Failure to secure and prevent access by unauthorized persons to vacant or abandoned property and/or structures.
E. The keeping, placement, or deposit on sidewalks, parking lots, landscaped or other private outdoor areas visible to the public right-of-way, of any of the following:
1. Debris, junk, lumber, or trash.
Item: 13
206
55136.00450\41520901.8
-8-
5 2
6 7
4 2. Abandoned, disregarded, or unused objects or equipment (e.g., refrigerators or other appliances, motor vehicle parts, any unsound structure, skateboard ramps, accumulated lumber, debris, trash, garbage).
3. Any conditions in this section which may be an attractive nuisance and dangerous to children.
F. Any swimming pool, pond, spa, abandoned well, or other body of water, that is stagnant, abandoned, unattended, or unfiltered.
G. Hoarding and/or hoarding conditions either in the interior or the exterior of a property.
H. Except where construction is occurring under a valid permit, the storage or parking of the following, visible from the public right-of-way, upon any property exterior within a residential zone: construction equipment, machinery, grading equipment, or supplies and materials of any type or description.
I. The parking, placement, or storage of any commercial vehicle over 22 feet long or 7 feet tall or 90 inches wide on residential property including, but not limited to:
buses, tow trucks, dump trucks, flatbed trucks, tractors, tractor trailers, truck trailers.
J. Use of commercial bins for single-family residential uses, except for the temporary purpose of renovation, demolition, and construction activities; K. Commercial shipping containers and other such commercial storage containers placed on a residential property for more than 14 consecutive days.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a container for the collection and disposal of construction and demolition debris may temporarily be stored on a Code-compliant paved driveway for a maximum of 90 days and only in conjunction with an active building permit.
L. Commercial bins stored in excess of 15 days on a public street or any front or side yard setback area without the express written approval of the Director of Community Development or the City Engineer.
M. Any property with accumulations of grease, oil, or other hazardous material on paved or unpaved surfaces, driveways, buildings, walls, or fences, or from which any such material flows or seeps onto any public street or other public or private property.
N. Except as otherwise authorized by a permit issued by the Director of Community Development or the City Engineer, the placing, depositing, or dumping of rocks, dirt, or waste materials on any of the following: public or private roads, including their right-of-way, private property accessible to the public via easement or license, private property without the owner's consent, public parks or any other public property not designated for such use by the City Council or other applicable governing authority.
Item: 13
207
55136.00450\41520901.8
-9-
5 2
6 7
4 O. Trailers, campers, boats, or motor vehicles parked or stored on vacant property or in front yards of developed lots, other than on a Code-compliant and paved driveway.
P. Parking, storing, or maintaining upon any residential property any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperable vehicle, where the vehicle is visible from the public right-of-way. Notwithstanding the foregoing, inoperative vehicles may be stored on private residential property in the following ways:
1. Enclosed completely within a garage where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property when the garage is closed; or
2. A screened paved surface that is not within the required building setback area abutting a public street excluding alleys. The screening shall consist of a minimum 6-foot tall permanent, solid, opaque fence or wall. The fence or wall shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with applicable development standards for fences and walls.
Q. The storing or parking of a vehicle, including a recreational vehicle, on private property where the vehicle is connected to utilities such as electrical, gas, water, and sewage. The foregoing does not apply to any of the following:
1. A vehicle parked for no more than 48 hours in connection with emergency repairs.
2. The charging of an electric vehicle.
3. Connections to utilities that the vehicle’s owner lawfully has access to for any 72-hour period immediately preceding or following the use of a recreational vehicle for its intended purpose off-site. For purposes of this subsection, “intended purpose” means an off-site trip with the primary intention of recreation, sightseeing, or touristic activities.
R.Occupancy
1. Habitable structures failing to provide and maintain light, ventilation, and space conditions in compliance with the requirements set forth in the California Building Code and California Residential Code.
2. Garages, kitchens, and other non-habitable spaces used for sleeping purposes, or as any other habitable space.
3. Any structure, or portions thereof, occupied for cooking, dining, living, or sleeping that was not permitted by the City to be used for occupancy in compliance with local and State law, including the California Building Code.
Item: 13
208
55136.00450\41520901.8
-10-
5 2
6 7
4 4. In residential properties containing two or more bedrooms, a condition such that a bedroom constitutes the only means of access to other bedrooms or habitable spaces, and/or is the only means of egress from other habitable spaces.
5. Any habitation which is overcrowded, as defined by the Uniform Housing Code and/or any local amendments thereto adopted by the City, or which lacks adequate ventilation, sanitation, or plumbing facilities, or which constitutes a fire hazard.
S.Fire
1. Absent, unsafe, or obstructed continuous path of travel from any point in a building or structure to the public way. Means of egress shall comply with the California Fire Code.
2. Non-operational, defective, or absent fire protection, detection, and life safety systems required by the California Fire Code or California Residential Code.
T.Animals
1. The keeping of bees or any livestock as defined in 10.04.010 of this Code on any residential property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, hens are permitted and shall be limited to a maximum of four per property.
2. Any “pest breeding hazard,” as that term is defined in section
6.28.010 of this Code.
U. Any noise in violation of the provisions of Chapter 11.16 (Noise Control) of this Code.
V. Any business or other activity not consistent with all the terms and conditions of all applicable zoning approvals and approved plans granted by the City.
W. Construction of a building or structure, or establishment of any land use, not approved by the City.
X. Any other conditions declared by any state, county, or City statute, code, or regulation to be a public nuisance.”
SECTION 6. Code Amendment – Addition of Section 6.14.017. Section
6.14.017 – "Definitions," is hereby added to the Lake Forest Municipal Code, to read in its entirety as follows:
“6.14.017 Definitions.
The following terms used in this chapter shall have the meaning indicated below:
Item: 13
209
55136.00450\41520901.8
-11-
5 2
6 7
4 Commercial bins means bins provided by a collector, usually three (3) cubic yards or greater in capacity and designed for the deposit of solid waste, including recyclable solid waste and green waste, charged at commercial rates.
Commercial vehicle means any motorized or non-motorized vehicle used or maintained to transport property or goods for profit or persons for hire or compensation.
Habitable space means space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating or cooking.
Bathrooms, toilet rooms, closets, halls, storage, garages, utility spaces, and similar areas are not considered habitable spaces.
Hen means a female chicken that is not a rooster or cockerel.
Hoarding or hoarding conditions means the excessive collection or accumulation of items in an unsafe, unsightly, or unsanitary condition. Hoarding often creates such cramped conditions that homes or yards may be filled to capacity, with only narrow pathways winding through stacks of clutter. Hoarding also includes the hoarding of animals, often resulting in dozens or hundreds of pets being kept in unsanitary conditions.
Infestation means the presence, within or contiguous to, a structure or premises of insects, rodents, vermin, or other pests.
Inoperable vehicle means a vehicle that is:
1. Mechanically incapable of being driven; or
2. Prohibited from being operated on a public street or highway pursuant to the provisions of the California Vehicle Code sections 4000, 5202, 24002, or 40001, concerning license plates, registration, equipment, safety, and related matters.
Residential uses means lands, buildings, structures, or portions thereof used, designed, or intended for use as a home or residence of one or more individuals, and shall include a single detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling, a multiple dwelling, an apartment dwelling, and the residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure.
Vehicle shall have the same meaning as section 670 of the California Vehicle Code.
Vacant property means any vacant parcel of land, building or structure on real property in any zone in the City where the responsible person has left such property vacant and unoccupied for a period exceeding 30 calendar days.” SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days after its adoption.
SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or Item: 13
210
55136.00450\41520901.8
-12-
5 2
6 7
4 unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage, and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or a summary thereof, to be published and/or posted in the manner required by law.
SECTION 10. Record of Proceedings. The documents and materials associated with this Ordinance that constitute the record of proceedings on which the City Council’s findings and determinations are based are located at Lake Forest City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630. The City Clerk is the custodian of the record of proceedings.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this XXth day of XX, 2023. _______________________
DOUG CIRBO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LISA BERGLUND, MPA
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MATTHEW E. RICHARDSON
CITY ATTORNEY
Item: 13
211
55136.00450\41520901.8
-13-
5 2
6 7
4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. _______ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of ________, 2023, and thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ___ day of _____ 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
LISA BERGLUND, MPA
CITY CLERK
Item: 13
212
5 2
7 5
3 ATTACHMENT 2
Item: 13
213
5 2
7 5
3 For the purpose of this attachment, the following acronyms are used. •LFMC: Lake Forest Municipal Code
•IPMC: International Property Maintenance Code:
Code Section – 6.12.010 Property
Maintenance Requirements Source
A.Graffiti. All structures, equipment, walls, and
fencing on the property shall be maintained free
of graffiti pursuant to Chapter 6.14 Article II of
this code.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
B.Building exteriors. Exterior building surfaces
shall be maintained free of significant surface
cracks, missing materials, warping, and dry rot
which either threaten the structural integrity or
result in a dilapidated appearance.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
C.Paint. Painted surfaces on buildings, trash
enclosures, walls, retaining walls, fences, and
structures shall be maintained and free of decay,
cracking, peeling, chalking, dry rot, warping, or
termite infestation.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
D.Walls and fences. All walls (including retaining
and crib walls), fences abutting public rights-of-
way (including alleys) and trash enclosures shall
be maintained free of surface cracks, dry rot,
warping, deterioration, leaning, missing panels
or blocks, which either threaten the structural
integrity or result in a dilapidated appearance.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
E.Parking areas, sidewalks.
1. Privately owned driveways, parking
areas, alleys, sidewalks, and walkways shall be
maintained free of potholes, cracks, breaks, lifting, and other deteriorated conditions.
2. All required parking lot striping, markings,
signage, and wheel stops shall be maintained free of
deteriorated conditions.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
F.Stairs and walking surfaces. Every stair, ramp,
landing, balcony, porch, deck, or other walking
surface shall be maintained in good repair.
Maintenance standard from
the IPMC
G.Use of plastic coverings. Plastic coverings such
as tarpaulin for roof and building repairs shall be
prohibited, except for a maximum of 30 days for
emergency repairs. Additionally, the use of
tarpaulin for vehicle covers, or temporary
canopies, enclosures, and/or awnings is
prohibited in any outdoor area visible from any
public right-of-way.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
Item: 13
214
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section – 6.12.010 Property
Maintenance Requirements Source
H.Canopies. Any canopy located on a residential
property shall be partially or wholly screened
from the public right-of-way by either a building
and/or a solid, opaque wall or fence that is a
minimum of six feet in height. The canopy shall
be maintained in good condition and shall be
removed, cleaned, or replaced if torn, faded, or
dirty.
New LFMC standard
I.Lighting. All exterior light fixtures shall be
maintained in good working order free of broken
lamps, lenses, and light bulbs. Furthermore, the
structural integrity of all supporting poles and
mounting fixtures shall be maintained. All
insulation and connections shall be intact and
free of exposed wire.
Maintenance standard from
the IPMC
J.Windows.
1. Every window, skylight, and door frame shall
be kept in good repair, and weathertight. Glazing
materials shall be maintained free from cracks and
holes. Broken windows and glass doors are prohibited.
2. Use of materials other than glass as a
replacement or covering of windowpanes is prohibited
for longer than 30 days, whereupon replacement
windowpanes compliant with the requirements of the
California Building Standards Code shall be installed.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC and adopted
Maintenance standard from
the IPMC
K.Window screens. All window and glass door
screens shall be maintained free of tears, rips,
and holes. On residential rental properties,
window screens are required on all windows.
Maintenance standard from
the IPMC
L.Signs. All signs shall be maintained to prevent
deterioration, disrepair, and unsightliness. All
illuminated signs must be maintained in proper
working order.
Maintenance standard of
existing LFMC
M.Excavations. Excavations, abandoned wells,
shafts, basements, and other holes shall be
properly secured to prevent access by
unauthorized persons.
Partially addressed in the
LFMC and Uniform Housing
Code
N.Landscaping.
1. All unpaved areas requiring landscaping shall be
landscaped. Landscaping shall be maintained in a
healthy condition free of dying, dead, diseased,
decayed, discarded, and/or overgrown vegetation.
Landscaping shall be maintained consistent with
section 9.144.060.2 of this Code.
Maintenance standard of
existing LFMC and
development standards.
Item: 13
215
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section – 6.12.010 Property
Maintenance Requirements Source
2. The public parkway shall be landscaped and
maintained by the adjacent property owner(s). The
landscaping, including trees, shall be maintained in a
healthy condition free of dying, dead, diseased,
decayed, discarded, and/or overgrown vegetation.
3. Landscape shall be maintained so as not to
cause an obstruction to the public right-of-way, the
vision of motorists or a hazardous condition to property, pedestrians, or vehicle traffic. Trees and other such
vegetation shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance
of 14 feet above roadway surfaces and 7 feet above
sidewalk and footpath surfaces
O.Trash containers.
1. On multi-family residential properties and in
commercial and industrial zones, trash bins and
dumpsters shall at all times, with the exception of
collection day, be stored within a City-approved trash
enclosure and screened from public view.
2. In residential zones, with the exception of
collection day, trash bins shall be stored out of view
from the public right of way.
3. Overflowing trash bins or dumpsters are
prohibited.
4. Trash bins shall always remain covered with an
approved lid.
Maintenance standard of
existing LFMC and
development standards.
P.Roofs. Roofs and flashing shall be maintained in
good repair and not have defects that admit rain.
Roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent
dampness or deterioration in the walls or interior
portion of the structure. Roof drains, gutters, and
downspouts shall be maintained in good repair
and free from obstructions. Roof water shall not
be discharged in a manner that creates a public
nuisance.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC and adopted
Maintenance standards
from the IPMC and
California Building Code.
Q.Rodent and vermin control. Consistent with state
and local law, including but not limited to
California Health and Safety Code section
116125 et seq. and Chapter 6.28 of this Code,
the interiors of structures and exterior property
shall be kept free from rodent harborage and
infestation of pests (including but not limited to,
bed bugs, roaches, lice, fleas, and ticks). Where
rodents or pests are found, they shall be
promptly exterminated by processes that will not
Adopted standard of the
California Health and Safety
Code. Maintenance
standard of existing LFMC.
Item: 13
216
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section – 6.12.010 Property
Maintenance Requirements Source
be injurious to human health and which are in
full compliance with all local, state, and federal
law. After pest elimination, proper precautions
shall be taken to prevent future harborage and
reinfestation.
R.Drainage. Onsite drainage shall be maintained
to prevent deterioration, disrepair, and
ineffectiveness.
Maintenance standard of
existing LFMC and
development standards.
S.Address numerals. Each building and unit on a
property shall have approved address numbers
placed in a position to be plainly legible and
visible from the street or road fronting the
property. These numbers shall contrast with
their background. Identification of individual units
shall be provided adjacent to the unit entrances.
Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or
alphabet letters. Numbers shall be not less than
4 inches (102 mm) in height with a minimum
stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm).
Maintenance standard from
the IPMC and California
Fire Code
T.Swimming pools.
1. Swimming pool and spa water shall be
maintained in a clean and clear condition, free of algae, insects, and debris. The floor of the pool shall be
clearly visible.
2. Barrier fencing and gates for swimming pools
and spas shall be maintained as required by
the California Residential Code.
Maintenance standards of
the California Health and
Safety Code and California
Residential Code
U.Electrical equipment.
1. Raceways, cable assemblies, boxes, cabinets,
fittings, and other electrical wiring, equipment, and
appliances shall be properly installed and maintained in accordance with the California Electrical Code.
2. Wiring not approved by the California Electrical
Code shall not be used for running through doors,
windows, or cabinets, or concealed within walls, floors, ceilings, or as otherwise prohibited.
3. Temporary wiring for uses such as holiday lights
shall be installed in a safe manner. The use of
temporary wiring for electrical power and lighting
installations shall not exceed a period of 90 days.
Maintenance standards of
the California Health and
Safety Code, California
Electrical Code, and IPMC.
V.Mechanical equipment.
1. Mechanical equipment, appliances, fireplaces,
solid fuel-burning appliances, cooking appliances, and
Maintenance standards of
the California Health and
Safety Code, California
Item: 13
217
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section – 6.12.010 Property
Maintenance Requirements Source
water heating appliances shall be properly installed and maintained in a safe working condition and shall be
capable of safely performing their intended function.
2. Dwellings shall be provided with the required
heating facilities capable of maintaining a room
temperature of 65°F (18°C) in all habitable rooms,
bathrooms, and toilet rooms. The required room
temperatures shall be measured 3 feet (914 mm) above
the floor near the center of the room and 2 feet (610 mm) inward from the center of each exterior wall.
3. Cooking appliances shall not be used, nor shall
portable unvented fuel-burning space heaters be used,
to provide required heating. Portable space heaters
may not be used to achieve compliance with this
section.
Mechanical Code, and
IPMC.
W.Plumbing equipment
1. Plumbing fixtures shall be properly installed and
maintained in working order, and shall be kept free from obstructions, leaks, and defects, and shall further be
capable of performing the function for which such
plumbing fixtures are designed. Plumbing fixtures shall be maintained in a safe, sanitary, and functional
condition per the California Plumbing Code.
2. Every dwelling unit shall contain its own bathtub
or shower, lavatory, water closet, and kitchen sink,
which shall be maintained in a sanitary, safe working
condition. A kitchen sink shall not be used as a
substitute for the required lavatory.
3. Water heating facilities shall be properly
installed and maintained per the California Plumbing
Code. They must be capable of providing an adequate
amount of water to be drawn at every required sink,
lavatory, bathtub, shower, and laundry facility at a
temperature not less than 110°F (43°C).”
Maintenance standards of
the California Health and
Safety Code, California
Plumbing Code, and IPMC.
Item: 13
218
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section 6.14.002 – Public Nuisances
Designated Source
A. Any violation of any section of the Lake Forest
Municipal Code, including any code adopted by
reference;
Current LFMC
B. Buildings or structures which are partially
destroyed, boarded up, abandoned or permitted to
remain in a state of partial construction for more
than six months, and any period of extension, after
the expiration of a building permit;
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
C.Land, the topography or configuration of which, in
any man-made state, whether as a result of grading
operations, excavations, fill, or other alteration,
interferes with the City-approved drainage pattern
over the property or from adjoining or other
properties which does or may result in erosion,
subsidence, or surface water drainage programs of
such magnitude as to be injurious to public health,
safety, and welfare or to neighboring properties;
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
D.Failure to secure and prevent access by
unauthorized persons to vacant or abandoned
property and/or structures.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
E. The keeping, placement, or deposit on
sidewalks, parking lots, landscaped or other private
outdoor areas visible to the public right-of-way, of
any of the following:
1. Debris, junk, lumber, or trash.
2. Abandoned, disregarded, or unused objects or
equipment (e.g., refrigerators or other appliances, motor vehicle parts, any unsound structure, skateboard ramps, accumulated lumber, debris, trash, garbage).
3. Any conditions in this section which may be an
attractive nuisance and dangerous to children.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
F. Any swimming pool, pond, spa, abandoned well,
or other body of water, that is stagnant,
abandoned, unattended, or unfiltered.
Current LFMC
G. Hoarding and/or hoarding conditions either in the
interior or the exterior of a property.
Current LFMC
H. Except where construction is occurring under a
valid permit, the storage or parking of the following,
visible from the public right-of-way, upon any
property exterior within a residential zone:
construction equipment, machinery, grading
equipment, or supplies and materials of any type
or description.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
Item: 13
219
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section 6.14.002 – Public Nuisances
Designated Source
I. The parking, placement, or storage of any
commercial vehicle over 22 feet long or 7 feet tall
or 90 inches wide on residential property including,
but not limited to: buses, tow trucks, dump trucks,
flatbed trucks, tractors, tractor trailers, truck
trailers.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
J. Use of commercial bins for single-family
residential uses, except for the temporary purpose
of renovation, demolition, and construction
activities;
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
K. Commercial shipping containers and other such
commercial storage containers placed on a
residential property for more than 14 consecutive
days. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a container
for the collection and disposal of construction and
demolition debris may temporarily be stored on a
Code-compliant paved driveway for a maximum of
90 days and only in conjunction with an active
building permit.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC with new time
frames.
L. Commercial bins stored in excess of 15 days on a
public street or any front or side yard setback area
without the express written approval of the Director
of Community Development or the City Engineer.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
M. Any property with accumulations of grease, oil, or
other hazardous material on paved or unpaved
surfaces, driveways, buildings, walls, or fences, or
from which any such material flows or seeps onto
any public street or other public or private property.
Current LFMC
N. Except as otherwise authorized by a permit issued
by the Director of Community Development or the
City Engineer, the placing, depositing, or dumping
of rocks, dirt, or waste materials on any of the
following: public or private roads, including their
right-of-way, private property accessible to the
public via easement or license, private property
without the owner's consent, public parks or any
other public property not designated for such use
by the City Council or other applicable governing
authority.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
O. Trailers, campers, boats, or motor vehicles parked
or stored on vacant property or in front yards of
developed lots, other than on a Code-compliant
and paved driveway.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
Item: 13
220
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section 6.14.002 – Public Nuisances
Designated Source
P. Parking, storing, or maintaining upon any
residential property any abandoned, wrecked,
dismantled, or inoperable vehicle, where the
vehicle is visible from the public right-of-way.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, inoperative
vehicles may be stored on private residential
property in the following ways:
1. Enclosed completely within a garage where it is
not visible from the street or other public or private
property when the garage is closed; or
2. A screened paved surface that is not within the
required building setback area abutting a public street excluding alleys. The screening shall consist of a
minimum 6-foot tall permanent, solid, opaque fence or
wall. The fence or wall shall be constructed and
maintained in accordance with applicable development
standards for fences and walls.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC with new storage
standards
Q. The storing or parking of a vehicle, including a
recreational vehicle, on private property where the
vehicle is connected to utilities such as electrical,
gas, water, and sewage. The foregoing does not
apply to any of the following:
1. A vehicle parked for no more than 48 hours in
connection with emergency repairs.
2. The charging of an electric vehicle.
3. Connections to utilities that the vehicle’s owner
lawfully has access to for any 72-hour period
immediately preceding or following the use of a
recreational vehicle for its intended purpose off-site. For purposes of this subsection, “intended purpose” means
an off-site trip with the primary intention of recreation, sightseeing, or touristic activities.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC
R.Occupancy
1. Habitable structures failing to provide and
maintain light, ventilation, and space conditions in
compliance with the requirements set forth in the
California Building Code and California Residential
Code.
2. Garages, kitchens, and other non-habitable
spaces used for sleeping purposes, or as any other
habitable space.
3. Any structure, or portions thereof, occupied for
cooking, dining, living, or sleeping that was not permitted Standards from the
California Health and Safety
Code, California Residential
Code, and IPMC
Item: 13
221
5 2
7 5
3 Code Section 6.14.002 – Public Nuisances
Designated Source
by the City to be used for occupancy in compliance with local and State law, including the California Building
Code.
4. In residential properties containing two or more
bedrooms, a condition such that a bedroom constitutes
the only means of access to other bedrooms or
habitable spaces, and/or is the only means of egress
from other habitable spaces.
5. Any habitation which is overcrowded, as defined
by the Uniform Housing Code and/or any local
amendments thereto adopted by the City, or which
lacks adequate ventilation, sanitation, or plumbing
facilities, or which constitutes a fire hazard.
S.Fire
1. Absent, unsafe, or obstructed continuous path of
travel from any point in a building or structure to the public way. Means of egress shall comply with the
California Fire Code.
2. Non-operational, defective, or absent fire
protection, detection, and life safety systems required by the California Fire Code or California Residential Code.
Standards from the
California Fire Code,
California Health and Safety
Code, California Residential
Code, and IPMC
T.Animals
1. The keeping of bees or any livestock as defined
in 10.04.010 of this Code on any residential property.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, hens are permitted and
shall be limited to a maximum of four per property.
2. Any “pest breeding hazard,” as that term is
defined in section 6.28.010 of this Code.
Revised wording of existing
LFMC code; New standard
for keeping hens
U. Any noise in violation of the provisions of Chapter
11.16 (Noise Control) of this Code.
Support of existing LFMC
V. Any business or other activity not consistent with all the terms and conditions of all applicable zoning
approvals and approved plans granted by the City.
Current LFMC
W. Construction of a building or structure, or
establishment of any land use, not approved by the
City.
Support of existing LFMC
and development standards
X. Any other conditions declared by any state, county,
or City statute, code, or regulation to be a public
nuisance.
Current LFMC
Item: 13
222
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/7/2023
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR SOLID
WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve the Request for Proposals for Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services substantially in the form attached.
2. Authorize staff to solicit proposals.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The current franchise agreement with CR&R Environmental Services, Inc. (“CR&R”) for residential and commercial solid waste and recycling services will expire on April 30, 2024. The City has historically procured these services through the Request for Proposals process. The City of Laguna Hills also holds a franchise agreement for similar services that expires April 30, 2024. Through a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), the two cities developed a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) jointly. The documents were prepared by the City’s consultant, EcoNomics, and reviewed by the City Attorney’s Offices in both cities.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the RFP substantially in the form attached and authorize staff to solicit proposals in accordance with the MOU.
BACKGROUND:
Since its incorporation, the City of Lake Forest has provided solid waste collection and disposal services via an agreement with a private waste hauler.
The City has historically procured these services through a competitive Request for Proposals process to ensure transparency and competitive pricing for the community. The history of solid waste services procurements is outlined in the following table:
Full Contract Term Hauler Method of Procurement
02/26/91 – 08/31/96 Dewey’s Rubbish Service Assumed from County Item: 14
223
09/01/96 – 08/31/03 Waste Management Request for Proposals 09/01/03 – 04/30/14 Waste Management Request for Proposals 05/01/14 – 06/30/24 CR&R Request for Proposals
Most recently, on March 4, 2014, the City Council awarded the franchise agreement to CR&R Environmental Services, Inc. (“CR&R”) for the collection, transportation, processing, and diversion of recyclable materials and municipal solid waste (“Franchise Agreement”). The original term of the Franchise Agreement was May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2022, and included two one-year extensions that CR&R could earn by meeting certain performance goals designed to increase the City’s waste diversion from landfills. The City Council awarded the first one-year extension to the Franchise Agreement with CR&R on February 21, 2017, in advance of the agreement expiring in 2022. On April 20, 2021, the City Council awarded the second one-year extension, which extended the Franchise Agreement to June 30, 2024. The City of Laguna Hills holds a franchise agreement for similar solid waste services that also expires on June 30, 2024.
On September 20, 2021, the cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (”MOU”) for the purpose of sharing costs while developing procurement documents for the selection of a solid waste and recycling services provider (Attachment 1). On February 1, 2022, after a joint selection process with Laguna Hills, the City Council awarded a professional consultant services agreement to EcoNomics, Inc. (“EcoNomics”) to provide consulting services during the solid waste agreement procurement process. The City of Lake Forest is the lead agency for the project. As such, Lake Forest requests and collects payment from the City of Laguna Hills for 50% of the consultant’s fees.
On April 19, 2022, the Lake Forest City Council created a Solid Waste Procurement Ad-Hoc Committee (“Committee”) and appointed then-Mayor Robert Pequeno and then-Mayor Pro Tem Doug Cirbo to the Committee. On April 26, 2022, the City of Laguna Hills City Council appointed City Councilmembers Don Caskey and Erica Pezold to serve on the Committee. The Committee also includes the City Manager and staff from both cities.
On April 18, 2023, the Lake Forest City Council approved the First Amendment (Attachment 2) to the MOU between the City of Laguna Hills and the City of Lake Forest to include the procurement, selection, and recommendation of a single solid waste hauler for the two cities. As part of the updated terms of the MOU, each city would have a separate agreement for services at the end of the joint procurement.
DISCUSSION:
Item: 14
224
The City currently provides solid waste and recycling collection, processing, and disposal services for its residents and commercial businesses via the Franchise Agreement with CR&R. The Franchise Agreement expires on June 30, 2024. The City of Laguna Hills holds a franchise agreement for similar solid waste services that also expires on June 30, 2024. For the purposes of sharing costs and resources, the City of Lake Forest and the City of Laguna Hills entered into an MOU to procure new solid waste services jointly.
Historically, the City has utilized a competitive RFP process to procure solid waste services. This process represents the fourth time the City has undertaken an RFP since the City’s incorporation in 1991 when it took over the County’s agreement with Dewey’s Rubbish Service. The RFP process encourages multiple proposers to compete for the opportunity to provide solid waste services within the City. This helps the City secure services at competitive pricing for its residents and businesses. The following discussion provides an overview of the RFP documents, the selection process for a solid waste services provider, integrity rules, next steps, and staff recommendation.
RFP Overview
During the Ad Hoc Committee meetings, the Committee discussed numerous policy and scope of work items to be included in the proposed Solid Waste RFP documents. Request for Proposal documents include general proposal requirements, key dates during the process, background of existing solid waste program, technical requirements, description of the evaluation process, required proposal forms, and the draft agreement (Attachment 3). Also incorporated in the RFP are items recommended by the Committee including:
•Initial eight-year agreement term with two one-year extensions based on performance measurements related to contamination rates. •Residential three-cart bundled rate with rates determined by size of trash container.
•Residential kitchen pail distribution for organics collection. •Single-family residents with handicap placards to receive backyard roll-out service at no charge.
•Cross-jurisdictional routing for residential and commercial/multifamily allowed between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills within a proscribed methodology.
•50% recycling and organics rate incentives for commercial/multifamily customers compared to solid waste rates.
•Provision for new vehicles and collection containers for residential and commercial/multifamily customers with colors in alignment with SB 1383. •Provision of recycling coordinators.
Item: 14
225
•Special programs such as:
oTwo residential bulky item pickups included annually per residence, with a limit of 10 items per pickup
oAnnual community bulky item drop-off event
oAnnual household hazardous waste collection event
oTwo compost giveaways and one compost workshop annually •Lightweight vehicles for commercial recycling.
•One electric collection vehicle for use in the two-city area. •Technology such as collision avoidance systems, on-board scales, and cloud-based customer relationship management (“CRM”) software. •Provision making temporary roll-off bin service for Construction and Demolition (“C&D”) projects exclusive to the agreement.
Also discussed by the Committee was the provision of Regulatory Compliance Costs in lieu of a Franchise Fee. Due to recent case law, the draft agreement does not include franchise fees. Instead, the agreement would include cost recovery from the hauler for the amount it costs the City to administer the agreement, comply with state regulations such as AB 939 and SB 1383, mitigate pavement impacts from heavy trucks, and procure recovered organic waste products such as compost and mulch.
In addition, the proposed RFP includes two separate rate schedules for the proposers to fill out. This allows the proposer to submit rates that assume cross- jurisdictional efficiencies between the cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills and a second schedule of rates that would only be used if one of the cities decides to stop allowing cross-jurisdictional sharing of routes or decides to terminate its agreement with the selected hauler.
The proposed RFP was prepared by the City’s consultant and reflects the recommendations made by the Ad Hoc Committee. City staff and specialists from the City Attorney’s Offices for the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills both reviewed and worked with the consultant’s attorney and staff to review and create the documents. The City Attorney’s office has approved them as to form.
Selection Process
Staff from both Cities and the consultant will review the proposals for completeness and responsiveness to the RFP. Proposals would also be evaluated and analyzed according to each criterion listed in the RFP. Evaluation criteria include, but are not limited to, the experience of each proposing hauler and its key personnel, technical abilities, implementation plan, financial capability, diversion strategy, and cost proposal. Following a comprehensive evaluation of each proposal, staff and the consultants would interview qualified proposers. After careful consideration and upon identifying the strengths and Item: 14
226
weaknesses of each proposal, staff and the consultant would brief the Ad Hoc Committee for their advisement and recommendation. Staff would then present a recommended new Solid Waste Collection Services Agreement to the City Council for its consideration.
Integrity Rules
To ensure the integrity of the procurement process, the RFP includes Process Integrity Rules that all proposers would be required to follow. The Integrity Rules would require that all communications regarding the RFP process be made strictly to the Cities’ RFP Coordinator and prohibit potential proposers from contacting other City representatives, including City Council Members. As the City of Lake Forest is the lead agency, the Lake Forest Public Works Administrative Services Manager serves as the designated RFP Coordinator.
Communications from the RFP Coordinator would be issued to all proposers simultaneously in writing.
Additionally, the Process Integrity Rules state that all proposal submittals would be considered final, and no changes would be accepted after submittal. Any proposer seeking to submit a contestation in any part of the process would be required to submit their claim to both Cities. Finally, to ensure adherence to the process rules, any proposer who fails to utilize the specified process for communication would be notified of its violation and may be disqualified.
The Process Integrity Rules are meant to create a fair, transparent process, and provide a level “playing field” for all proposers. It would also create a clear paper trail of all communications between the City and proposers. The Process Integrity Rules would be in effect immediately following the approval of the RFP documents and remain in effect through the award of a Solid Waste Collection Services Agreement.
Next Steps
The City of Laguna Hills is scheduled to present the RFP documents to its City Council later this month. It is anticipated that the RFP would be released no later than November 21, 2023.
The anticipated schedule for this project is as follows:
Lake Forest City Council consideration of authorization to solicit proposals
November 7, 2023
Laguna Hills City Council consideration of authorization to solicit proposals
November 14, 2023
Anticipated RFP release November 21, 2023
Item: 14
227
Mandatory pre-proposal meeting December 5, 2023
Written questions on RFP/Draft Contract due to City December 22, 2023 Written responses to all questions issued by City January 11, 2024 Proposals due February 23, 2024
Recommendation to Lake Forest City Council for award July 2, 2024 Recommendation to Laguna Hills City Council for award July 9, 2024 Collection operations begin under new agreement July 1, 2025 Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Request for Proposals for Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services substantially in this form and authorize staff to solicit proposals.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with approval of the RFP documents and authorization to solicit proposals.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memorandum Of Understanding By and Between the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills
2. Amendment 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding By and Between the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills
3. Proposed Request for Proposals and Proposal Forms
Initiated By: Christine Groves, Administrative Services Manager Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Item: 14
228
Attachment 1
Item: 14
229
Item: 14
230
Item: 14
231
Item: 14
232
Item: 14
233
Item: 14
234
Item: 14
235
Attachment 2
Item: 14
236
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
REGARDING SOLID WASTE PROCUREMENT SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO ME~ ORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("First Amendment") is made and entered into this 2Zf day of ~ , 2023 by and between the City of Laguna Hills ("Laguna Hills") and the City of Lake Forest( 'Lake Forest") (each individually a "Party" and collectively the "Parties").
RECITALS
A. Laguna Hills and Lake Forest entered into a Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Solid Waste Procurement Services dated September 20, 2021, which is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth herein ("MOU"), to cooperate in the Procurement (as defined in the MOU) for Services (as defined in the MOU) from a Hauler (as defined in the MOU).
B. The Parties desire to enter into this First Amendment to extend the MOU and to clarify the Parties' rights and obligations with respect to the Procurement.
TERMS
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in this First Amendment, agree as follows:
I. Incorporation of Recitals & Defined Terms. The Recitals set forth above are true, correct, and incorporated herein. Any capitalized term not herein defined shall be given the same meaning as in the MOU.
II. Adjustment to terms for the Selection of Consultant. Section 6.4 of the MOU is hereby added to read in full as follows:
6.4 Selection of Hauler.
Notwithstanding Recital B of the Agreement, the Parties currently anticipate (but have not committed to) awarding separate franchises to serve each Party to a single Hauler, which may include provisions permitting the Hauler to propose and provide one or more collection route(s) serving customers within the Parties. The Procurement and Procurement Documents shall identify this as the preferred result, and the Parties shall jointly participate in all aspects of selecting the Hauler, including but not limited to the review, rating, and interviews of proposers.
Ill. Extension of MOU Term. Section 9 of the MOU is DELETED in its entirety and is hereby replaced with the following:
9. Term and Termination.
This MOU shall become effective as of the date it is executed by the last of the Parties, and shall continue in full force and effect until the Parties have completed the First Amendment to MOU re Solid Waste Procurement Services - Lake Forest - Laguna Hills 1762487.1
Item: 14
237
Procurement and the governing legislative body of each Party approves a contract with a Hauler. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either Party may at any time terminate this MOU without penalty by giving written notice of intent to terminate thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date of proposed termination. If either Party terminates this MOU before completion of the Procurement, the Parties shall each be responsible for their proportionate share of the consultant costs expended up to the date the notice of intent to terminate is received, including such future costs as cannot be reasonably canceled upon receipt of the notice of intent to terminate. Termination by either Party shall not terminate the Party's right to access any consultant work product or records as provided in Sections 6.2 and 6.3, or the defense and indemnification obligations set forth in Section 10.
IV. Miscellaneous Provisions
a. Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the MOU shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under First Amendment.
In the event of a conflict between this First Amendment and the MOU, the terms of this First Amendment shall prevail. This First Amendment may only be modified in a writing signed by both Parties.
b. This First Amendment is a completely integrated written agreement and supersedes any other agreements, both oral and written, between the Parties concerning the subject matter herein.
c. This First Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
d. A manually signed copy of this First Amendment which is transmitted by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this First Amendment for all purposes. This First Amendment may be signed using an electronic signature.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
First Amendment to MOU re Solid Waste Procurement Services - Lake Forest - Laguna Hills 1762487.1
Item: 14
238
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment was executed by the parties hereto as of the date first above written.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
By:
City Manager
By:
City Attorney
CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
First Amendment to MOU re Solid Waste Procurement Services - Lake Forest - Laguna Hills 1762487.1
Item: 14
239
Attachment 3
Item: 14
240
- 1 -
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
For the Collection, Transportation, Processing
and Diversion of Recyclable Materials and Other
Materials and For the Collection, Transportation
and Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste
Issued By:
City of Lake Forest City of Laguna Hills
100 Civic Center Drive 24035 El Toro Rd
Lake Forest, CA 92630 Laguna Hills, CA 92653
November 2023
Item: 14
241
- 2 -
1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 5
1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ............................................................ 6
1.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................. 6
1.3.1 Electronic Submittal ............................................................................................................................... 6
1.3.2 Paper Submittal ........................................................................................................................................ 7
1.3.3 Signature and Authority ........................................................................................................................ 7
1.3.4 Cost for Preparation of Proposals/Ownership of Proposals/Reimbursement to the Cities for RFP Preparation .................................................................................................................... 7
1.3.5 Proposals Are Subject to California Public Records Act .......................................................... 8
1.3.6 Rights Reserved by the Cities .............................................................................................................. 9
1.4 KEY DATES ............................................................................................................................................ 9
1.4.1 Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference ............................................................................................. 9
1.4.2 Cities’ RFP Coordinator ....................................................................................................................... 11
1.4.3 Submission Deadline and Address.................................................................................................. 11
1.5 PROPOSAL PROCESS INTEGRITY RULES .................................................................................. 11
1.5.1 Rules To Be Followed By All Proposers ........................................................................................ 11 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 14
2.1 DISCLAIMER FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITIES .................................................... 14
2.2 EXISTING SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING SYSTEM ............................................................. 14
2.2.1 Solid Waste Collection ......................................................................................................................... 15
2.2.2 Single-Family Residential Diversion Programs ......................................................................... 18
2.2.3 Multi-Family Diversion Programs ................................................................................................... 19
2.2.4 Commercial Diversion Programs .................................................................................................... 21
2.2.5 Construction/Demolition Debris Diversion Programs .......................................................... 25
2.2.6 Other Diversion Programs ................................................................................................................. 26
2.2.7 Collection Fleet and Routing ............................................................................................................. 27
2.2.8 New Developments within the Cities ............................................................................................. 29
2.2.9 Weekly Lifts .............................................................................................................................................. 31 3 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................... 33
3.1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................... 33
3.1.1 Agreement ................................................................................................................................................. 33
3.1.2 Diversion Collection Services ............................................................................................................ 33
3.1.3 MSW Collection Services ..................................................................................................................... 37
3.1.4 Cross-jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies ..................................................................................... 37
3.1.5 Cross-jurisdictional Routing Tonnage Allocations ................................................................... 38
3.1.6 Processing Facilities.............................................................................................................................. 38
3.1.7 Diversion Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 40
3.1.8 New Containers to be Provided ....................................................................................................... 42
3.1.9 Alternative Fuel Vehicles .................................................................................................................... 42
3.1.10 Billing .......................................................................................................................................................... 43
3.1.11 One (1) Full-Time Recycling Coordinator in Laguna Hills, Two (2) Full-Time Recycling Coordinators in Lake Forest, One-Third (1/3) Time Operations and Item: 14
242
- 3 -
Customer City Liaison in Laguna Hills and One-Third (1/3) Time Operations and Customer City Liaison in Lake Forest ............................................................................................ 44
3.1.12 Implementation Plan ............................................................................................................................ 44
3.1.13 Use of Innovation in Implementation of Diversion Services................................................ 44
3.1.14 Edible Food Donation Programs – Selected Proposer to Cooperate and Assist with Cities’ and Regional Efforts ................................................................................................................ 45
3.1.15 Provision of Bin Sensors ..................................................................................................................... 46
3.1.16 HHW and Sharps Collection Programs ......................................................................................... 46
3.1.17 Annual Bulky Item Collection Event .............................................................................................. 46 4 BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 48
4.1 COMPENSATION TO SELECTED PROPOSER ............................................................................ 48
4.2 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ................................................................................................................. 50
4.3 ADJUSTMENTS TO COSTS .............................................................................................................. 50
4.4 BONDS, INSURANCE AND GUARANTY ....................................................................................... 50 5 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION ................................................................................. 51
5.1 EVALUATION PROCESS .................................................................................................................. 51
5.1.1 Review of Proposals for Responsiveness to RFP ...................................................................... 51
5.1.2 Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................. 52
5.1.3 AB 1669 ...................................................................................................................................................... 52
5.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA .......................................................................................... 53
5.3 PROPOSAL FORMS ........................................................................................................................... 59
5.4 CITY COUNCIL AWARD OF AGREEMENT .................................................................................. 59
5.5 PROPOSAL FORMS ........................................................................................................................... 60 Proposal Form 1: Proposal Transmittal Letter (Proposer To Retype On Company Letterhead) ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 62 Proposal Form 2: Proposer Information ........................................................................................................... 63 Proposal Form 3: Proposer Background and Experience .......................................................................... 64 Proposal Form 4: Proposer References ............................................................................................................. 65 Proposal Form 5: Names and Resumes of Key Personnel .......................................................................... 66 Proposal Form 6: Structure of Project Team ................................................................................................... 68 Proposal Form 7: List of Contractor-Furnished Personnel ....................................................................... 69 Proposal Form 8: New Collection Vehicles To Be Furnished By Contractor ...................................... 71 Proposal Form 9: Plan To Provide Light-Weight Collection Vehicles By Contractor ..................... 75 Proposal Form 10: Electric Collection Vehicle To Be Furnished By The Contractor ...................... 76 Proposal Form 11: Plans To Incorporate On-Board Technology To Be Provided By Contractor On Collection Vehicles To Increase Safety and Efficiency and For Contamination Monitoring . 77 Proposal Form 12: Numbers and Types of New Containers To Be Furnished By Contractor .... 78 Proposal Form 13: Implementation Plan .......................................................................................................... 81 Item: 14
243
- 4 -
Proposal Form 14: Description of Food Scrap and/or Yard Trimmings and/or Co-Collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps Processing Facility (Ies) To Be Used – Anaerobic Digestion (Including Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability To Receive Material) .................................... 82 Proposal Form 15: Description of Materials Recovery Processing Facility(Ies) – Clean MRF (Including Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability To Receive Material) .................................... 86 Proposal Form 16: Description of Compost Processing Facility(Ies) To Be Used For Yard Trimmings And/Or Food Scraps and/or Co-Collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps (Including Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability To Receive Material) .................................... 88 Proposal Form 17: Description of Processing Facility(Ies) – Bioengineered Feedstock (Include Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability To Receive Material) .......................................................... 91 Proposal Form 18: Description Of Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility(ies) To Be Used (Including Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability To Receive Material) ........... 95 Proposal Form 19: Pending Litigation and Assessment of Liquidated Damages ............................. 97 Proposal Form 20: Exceptions To Agreement ................................................................................................ 99 Proposal Form 21: Financial Statements ....................................................................................................... 100 Proposal Form 22: AB 1669 Statement .......................................................................................................... 101 Proposal Form 23: Kitchen Food Scraps Container ................................................................................... 102 Proposal Form 24: Commercial Internal Food Scraps Container ........................................................ 103 Proposal Form 25: Bin Sensors To Be Provided By Contractor............................................................ 104 Proposal Form 26: Description of Proposed Processing Facility(ies) To Be Used For Stable Bedding/Manure (Including Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability To Receive Material) ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 105 Proposal Form 27: Efficiencies Gained From Cross-Jurisdictional Collection Routes ................ 107 Proposal Form 28: Proposed Customer Service System ......................................................................... 110 Proposal Form 29: Proposed Maximum Rates To Be Charged ............................................................. 111 Proposal Form 30: Use of On-Board Scales To Accurately Report Tonnage Collected On Commercial and Multi-Family Cross-Jurisdictional Routes ................................................................... 112 Proposal Form 31: HHW and Sharps Collection Program Details ....................................................... 113 Proposal Form 32: Proposer’s Plan To Comply With California Air Resources Board Advanced Clean Fleets Program During Term of the Agreement ............................................................................. 114 Proposal Form 33: Proposer’s Plan For Annual Bulky Item Collection Event and Annual Bulky Item Drop-Off Day In Each City .......................................................................................................................... 116 6 AGREEMENT AND ATTACHMENTS ................................ ................................ ........................ 117 7 APPENDICES TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ................................ ................................ .....118 Item: 14
244
Privileged and Confidential Attorney-Client Communication & Attorney Work Product
5 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The Cit ies of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills (“the Cit ies”) are seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide municipal solid waste and divertible materials collection, processing, disposal, and transportation services. The two contiguous Cities are using a ‘joint’ RFP process to gain procurement process efficiencies and, when the contracts become effective, to maximize cross -jurisdictional routing efficiencies to reduce costs to ratepayers. Section 6 of this RFP includes the contract that each City plans to award to the selected proposer. The contracts are “mirror images” of each other. The Cities envision selecting the same proposer and each City awarding a contract to that selected Proposer.
The Cities are requesting proposals to provide collection, transportation and disposal of municipal solid waste and the collection, transportation, processing and diversion of recyclable materials, yard trimmings, food scraps, and other materials for an eight (8 ) year period beginning July 1, 2025 and terminating June 30, 2033 with the possibility of two (2) one-year extensions based on the selected Proposer’s attainment of performance measures. Both Cities’ have existing contracts with CR&R Incorporated (C R&R) which terminate June 30, 2024. The Cities are currently in discussions with CR&R to extend the existing contracts to June 30, 2025. The schedule for this procurement process is anticipated to be as follows:
Action Date
RFP Approved by Lake Forest City Council November 7, 2023 RFP Approved by Laguna Hills City Council November 14, 2023 RFP Released November 21, 2023
Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference at Lake Forest Civic Center December 5, 2023 Last Day for Written Questions on RFP/Agreement to be
Submitted to the Cities
December 22, 2023
Written Responses to RFP/Agreement Questions Issued by City January 11, 2024 Proposals Due February 23, 2024
Review of Proposals for Responsiveness to RFP per Section 5.1.1 of RFP
February 24 -March 4,
2024
Evaluation of all Responsive Proposals March - June 2024 Schedule for Interviews May 15-16, 2024
City Councils Award Agreement Summer/Fall 2024
Collection Operations Begin Under New Agreements July 1, 2025 Item: 14
245
6 It is recommended that Proposers set aside the interview dates of May 15-16, 2024 shown in the schedule above.
1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
This document is organized into the following sections:
• Section 1 summarizes the general requirements for participating in the Request For Proposal (RFP) Process.
• Section 2 provides background information on the Cit ies and their waste streams and collection systems.
• Section 3 summarizes the scope of services to be provided and certain technical requirements.
• Section 4 describes the business arrangements, including the selected Proposer’s compensation.
• Section 5 describes the specific information required in the proposal, provides the forms to be used for submission, and summarizes the evaluation process. • Section 6 contains the Agreement that the Cities will enter with the selected firm.
The Agreement includes A ttachments A -MM, which appear at the end of the Agreement.
• Section 7 contains the Appendices to this Request For Proposals that provide additional background information on Laguna Hills’ and Lake Forest’s solid waste and recycling systems as described in Section 2.
1.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The Proposer shall submit electronic and printed versions of the Proposal and forms that are complete and contain a substantial level of detail to allow adequate evaluation on a technical and financial basis by the Cities.
1.3.1 Electronic Submittal
The Proposer shall submit an electronic version of the Proposal and forms via USB thumb drive. The proposal forms will be completed in the following programs: Microsoft Word, Excel and Adobe Acrobat. The electronic version shall be submitted in the form of USB thumb drive included in the proposal package submitted to the Cities.
Item: 14
246
7 1.3.2 Paper Submittal
The Proposer shall also submit one (1) original (signed) hard copy and nine (9) signed hard copies of the proposal in its entirety, including all Proposal Forms, Appendices, Exhibits, and all other required documents as specified herein. The Proposal shall be typed or printed (1 -1/2- or double-spaced) on 8 -1/2-by-11-inch paper containing 100% post-consumer recycled content. The original shall be unbound and photocopy ready.
The copies shall be appropriately bound and may contain preprinted and photographic material at the option of the Proposer. Any oversize d documents must be folded to size and secured in the proposal.
1.3.3 Signature and Authority
The Proposal must be signed on Proposal Form 1 “Proposal Transmittal Letter ” by an officer of the corporation, principal, company partner, or other duly authorized person or persons with the legal authority, under California law, to make the commitments required by this Request for Proposals, including the Agreement in Section 6 of this RFP.
If a Limited Partnership submits the Proposal, the name and address of the partnership, a list of all partners, and the signature of one general partner must be provided. If made by a corporation, the Proposal must indicate the name and state or country u nder which the corporation is incorporated, and the name, address, and federal tax identification number of the corporation. If a corporation makes the Proposal, and it is not signed by two officers as required by California law, a certified copy of the appropriate section of the bylaws or a resolution of the Board of Directors of the corporation shall be furnished showing the authority of the officer who has signed the Proposal Transmittal Letter to execute contracts on behalf of the corporation. If the Proposal is made by a joint venture, a copy of the joint venture agreement, and the name, address, and organizational status of each of the joint venture partners must be provided. Where a joint venture is composed of one or more partnerships, corporation s, or other entities, the information specified in this paragraph must be provided for each entity.
1.3.4 Cost for Preparation of Proposals/Ownership of
Proposals/Reimbursement to the Cities for RFP Preparation
Each Proposal submitted in response to this Request for Proposals shall be prepared at the sole cost and expense of the Proposer with the understanding that no claims for reimbursement of such costs against the City of Lake Forest and/or Laguna Hills will be accepted. All Proposals will become the property of the Cit ies and, except for portions marked confidential, will not be returned to the Proposer.
Item: 14
247
8 PLEASE NOTE: Per Section 3.04 A 6 of the Agreement, upon selection, the successful Proposer will be required to make a payment to the Cit ies to offset the costs of development of the RFP and conducting the RFP and evaluation process. [The amount of the payment will be provided to proposers via an Addendum to the RFP]
1.3.5 Proposals Are Subject to California Public Records Act
California case law provides that all proposals received in response to this RFP can remain confidential and will not be disclosed under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 7920.000 et seq.) until a final proposal has been selected to be presented to the respective City Councils to be considered for contract award. After such time, all proposals are deemed public record s. Once a Proposer is recommended for selection by the City Councils, information submitted to the Cit ies by Proposers is subject to disclosure by either of the Cities upon request from any member of the public (including other Proposers) under the California Public Records Act . Proposals should not generally be marked as confidential or propr ietary, and the Cities may refuse to consider a proposal so marked. Except as noted below, all information contained within the proposals will become a matter of public record.
The Cities recognize that some Proposers may consider some information which is called for in the Request for Proposals, or which may be required to be submitted in subsequent stages of the evaluation and selection process, to be a trade secret or otherwise proprietary. Information that a Proposer wishes to be considered as confidential must be clearly marked, on each page, as “CONFIDENTIAL” and submitted separately in an envelope clearly marked with the Proposer’s name and stamped “CONFIDENTIAL.” However, neither of the Cities shall be under any obligation to keep any information confidential or prevent disclosure of information that either of the Cities determines is subject to disclosure under applicable law, which determination shall be made in the sole discretion of each of the Cities.
The Cities shall in their sole discretion determine whether to release materials marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” but prior to releasing any such information will advise any affected Proposer of the intention to do so. Proposer may then pursue, at its sole cost and expense, any and all appropriate legal action necessary to maintain the confidentiality of such information.
Submission of a Proposal is a voluntary act, and by submitting a Proposal, each Proposer agrees to waive any potential claims for damages against each of the Cities for result of the release of any information submitted by the Proposer in response to this Request for Proposals. Additionally, each Proposer covenants not to sue or to not seek any form of damages against the Cities (including without limitation attorneys' fees or other costs), as a result of the release of any information submitted by the Proposer.
Item: 14
248
9 By submitting a Proposal, Proposers acknowledge and voluntarily agree to be bound by all of the foregoing provisions.
1.3.6 Rights Reserved by the Cities
The Cities reserve the right, in their sole discretion, to pursue any or all of the following actions in regard to this Request for Proposals:
• Issue addenda to the Request for Proposals.
• Request additional information and/or clarification from the Proposers. • Permit the timely correction of errors or waive irregularities. • Reject any or all Proposals.
• Issue subsequent Requests for Proposals based on refinements of concepts proposed in response to the Request for Proposals.
• Withdraw this Request for Proposals.
• Extend the time for submittal of Proposals.
• Award contracts to two different Proposers
• Negotiate prices and terms with one or more Proposers. • Take whatever other action is deemed to be in the Cities’ interest.
This Request for Proposals does not obligate the Cit ies to accept any Proposal, accept the lowest cost Proposal, negotiate with any Proposer, award any agreement, or proceed with the development of any programs or projects described in response to this Request for Proposal.
1.4 KEY DATES
The following sections provide a description of the mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference and the key dates for the RFP process.
1.4.1 Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference
A mandatory Pre -Submittal Conference will be held on December 5, at 10 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, Lake Forest Civic Center, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California. The mandatory attendance at the Pre-Submittal Conference may be in person or online via GoToMeeting (or similar online portal selected by the Cit ies). Proposers attending in person will be required to sign in upon arriving at the Pre-Submittal Conference by providing their name and company name. Online Proposers will be Item: 14
249
10 required to verbally provide their name and company name at the start of the Pre- Submittal Conference. Proposers attending online will be required to turn their video/camera feed on and keep it on during the entire Pre-Submittal Conference in a manner such that the Cities’ representatives can see the face of the Proposer attending.
Any online Proposer without their video/camera feed on and showing their face during the entire Pre-Submittal Conference, will be disconnected from the Pre-Submittal Conference by the Pre-Submittal Conference online administrator, and will be considered as not having attended the mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference.
Proposers must request the Pre-Submittal Conference online link by 12:00 noon on December 1, 2023 by doing the following:
• Send an e mail to the Cit ies’ RFP Coordinator Christine Groves at, [email protected].
• Include relevant Proposer(s) email(s) to receive the Pre-Submittal Conference online link, and
• Clearly indicate the Proposer(s) and the Proposer(s) email(s) to receive the Proposal Process Integrity Rules. As described below in Section 1.5, the Proposal Process Integrity Rules must be docu-signed and returned by the end of the Pre- Submittal Conference to RFP Coordinator Christine Groves by email – [email protected].
If the Pre-Submittal Conference online link and Proposal Process Integrity Rules are not received by the Proposer by 12:00 noon on December 1, 2023, the Proposer must:
• Contact the Cities’ RFP Coordinator Christine Groves by telephone at (949) 461- 3571 by 3:00 pm on December 4, 2023 to coordinate receipt of the Conference online link and the Proposal Process Integrity Rules.
The Pre-Submittal Conference will include a general presentation about the Request for Proposals document, and a Question-and-Answer session on the RFP and the Agreement. Proposers may submit questions in writing to the Cities’ RFP Coordinator in advance of the Pre-Submittal Conference. The Cities will respond to as many questions as possible at the Pre-Submittal Conference. If there are questions that cannot be answered at the Pre-Submittal Conference, the Cit ies will provide responses in an Addendum to the RFP.
All questions raised before and during the Pre -Submittal Conference, as well as those that require follow-up, will be answered by the Cities via written Addendum no later than 5:00 P.M. on January 11, 2024. Attendance at the December 5, 2023 Pre-Submittal Conference is mandatory for all Proposers. Failure to attend will result in the disqualification of the Proposer.
Item: 14
250
11 1.4.2 Cities’ RFP Coordinator
Pursuant to the RFP Process In tegrity Rules in RFP Section 1.5 , Proposers shall direct all questions about the RFP and the RFP process in writing (or by email) to the Cit ies’ RFP Coordinator. The RFP Coordinator is:
Christine Groves
Administrative Services Manager
Public Works Department
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
Telephone: (949) 461-3571
Email: [email protected]
1.4.3 Submission Deadline and Address
Sealed proposals and online submittals of Proposals must be received in hard copy (including the USB thumbdrive) by the City of Lake Forest, in the office of the City Clerk, no later than 3:00 p.m., Local Time, on February 23, 2024 addressed as follows:
ATTN: City Clerk
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, California 92630
Proposals received after the deadline will be returned unopened and will not be considered. Postmarks will not be accepted as proof of receipt.
1.5 PROPOSAL PROCESS INTEGRITY RULES
1.5.1 Rules To Be Followed By All Proposers
In order to ensure a fair RFP process , the Cities have established Proposal Process Integrity Rules to govern interactions between the Proposers, the Cit ies, and the Cit ies’ representatives during the process. All Proposers shall strictly adhere to the following rules:
Item: 14
251
12 1. From the date that the Lake Forest City Council authorizes the issuance of the Request for Proposals (RFP), November 7, 2023, until the City Councils award an agreement, all contacts between Proposers and the Cit ies shall be through the Cities’ RFP Coordinator, Christine Groves. Contact information for the RFP Coordinator is contained in Section 1.4.2 of the RFP. Any attempt by a Proposer, including but not limited to an employee, officer, agent, consultant, lobbyist, or other person working for or acting on behalf of a Proposer to contact, or any contact made to any other person, including an elected or appointed official of the Cit ies, may be grounds for disqualification of the Proposer from the process. Contact includes verbal, written, email, fax, social media, and all other forms of communication to any person other than the Cities’ RFP Coordinator, and includes any communication by a Council member to a Proposer.
2. All Proposer questions shall be submitted in writing to the RFP Coordinator.
3. Any Communications from the Cit ies to a Proposer will be transmitted in writing simultaneously to all Proposers . All answers to written questions submitted by Proposers will also be transmitted in writing simultaneously to all Proposers.
4. All proposals submitted shall be final. No changes or alterations will be accepted after the deadline for proposal submission.
5. Any Proposer contesting any part of the RFP process shall submit their claim in writing simultaneously to the City Managers of both Cities, or their designees, for review by the Cities.
6. Any Proposer who fails to recognize or utilize this process of communications will be notified of its violation and may be disqualified from the selection process at the sole discretion and consensus of both City Managers.
All Proposers are required to sign a formal acknowledgement indicating receipt of , and understanding of, these Proposal Process Integrity Rules at the Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference.
The Proposal Process Integrity Rules must be signed by an authorized representative able to bind the Proposer.
Proposers attending the Pre-Submittal Conference in person will be provided a copy of the Proposal Process Integrity Rules to sign in person and return to the Cit ies’ RFP Coordinator Christine Groves by the end of the Pre-Submittal Conference.
As indicated above in Section 1. 4.1, Proposers attending the Pre-Submittal Conference online will receive the Proposal Process Integrity Rules via email prior to the Pre- Item: 14
252
13 Submittal Conference. As described above in Section 1.4.1 , it is the Proposers’ responsibility to ensure they have received the Proposal Process Integrity Rules prior to the Pre-Submittal Conference. Proposers attending online shall docu -sign the Proposal Process Integrity Rules and email the docu -signed Proposal Process Integrity Rules by the end of the Pre-Submittal Conference to the Cities’ RFP Coordinator Christine Groves, [email protected].
Item: 14
253
14 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 DISCLAIMER FOR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITIES
The information in this section and in the Appendices to this RFP is provided as background to the Proposers responding to the Request for Proposals issued by the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills. The Cit ies neither warrant nor accept responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained herein. It is the responsibility of each Proposer to undertake, at its sole cost, any desired investigation and verification of this information as may be deemed necessary to submit a response to this Request for Proposals.
2.2 EXISTING SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING SYSTEM
CR&R currently provides collection services for commercial and residential customers in the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills. The current franchise began on May 1, 2013 for the City of Lake Forest and on October 1, 2004 for the City of Laguna Hills. Both contracts have been amended to align with the requirements of SB 1383.
The tables below in Sections 2.2.1– 2.2.9 provide inventory data and service logistics as of December 2022.
In addition, there are nine (9) appendices to the RFP that provide more detailed background information:
• Appendix 1 includes detailed monthly tonnage reports submitted by CR&R on its MSW collection and the diversion programs that were in place during 2022 for both of the Cities.
• Appendix 2 contains CR&R’s 2022 Annual Reports for both of the Cities. • Appendix 3 includes the Cities’ CalRecycle Annual Report s for 2022 that further describe all of the existing diversion programs for the Cities. • Appendix 4 includes the regulatory requirements of AB 1669. • Appendix 5 includes commercial listings for both of the Cities. • Appendix 6 includes a listing of residential accounts and their existing service levels provided by CR&R for both of the Cities.
• Appendix 7 includes the bus shelter maps for both of the Cities. • Appendix 8 includes the current franchise agreements for both of the Cities. • Appendix 9 includes detailed maps of multi -family enclosure locations and inventories in the City of Laguna Hills
Item: 14
254
15 2.2.1 Solid Waste Collection
According to the current contractor’s records as of 2022, municipal solid waste (MSW) is collected from approximately 8,201 residential customers weekly in Laguna Hills and 19,563 accounts in Lake Forest in three streams: Green waste in wheeled carts, single stream recyclables in wheeled carts, and MSW in wheeled carts. As of July 1, 2021, the green carts accept co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings in Lake Forest. Laguna Hills implemented its curbside co -collected food scraps and yard trimmings program on October 1, 2022. Table 1 displays the container i nventories for the residential sector for Lake Forest and Table 2 shows the same for Laguna Hills.
Table 1: Residential Container Count as of December 2022 – Lake Forest Size MSW RCY ORG
35-gallon 1,155 1,145 4,845
65-gallon 4,851 4,919 2,625
96-gallon 15,063 14,895 13,607
Total 21,069 20,959 21,077
Table 2: Residential Container Count as of December 2022 – Laguna Hills Size MSW RCY ORG STABLE BEDDING
35-gallon 620 709 499 0
65-gallon 4,852 5,181 4,467 36
96-gallon 3,391 3,028 3,533 110
Total 8,863 8,918 8,499 146
An online map of residential customers is available to view here:
https://arcg.is/0LieKG
Please note, to view the map’s full functionality, please ensure the file is being viewed in Map Viewer in your browser. This can be done by clicking the button titled ‘Open in Map Viewer’ in the upper -right of the browser window. GIS layers can be provided for this dataset upon request from the Cities’ RFP Coordinator.
As of December 202 2, approximately 8,334 cubic yards of MSW were on service each week on the current contractor’s commercial route and 4,130 cubic yards for its multi- family MSW routes for Lake Forest . For Laguna Hills, there were approximately 4 ,206 cubic yards of MSW on service each week on the current contractor’s commercial route and 1,365 cubic yards for its multi-family MSW routes. According to CR&R’s 2022 annual report, there were a total of 740 commercial accounts and 107 multi-family accounts in Item: 14
255
16 Lake Forest. According to CR&R’s 2022 annual report, i n Laguna Hills, there were 273 commercial accounts and 14 multi-family accounts. Table 3 displays the number of MSW collection containers by container size and collection frequency for all commercial accounts as of December 202 2 in Lake Forest . Table 4 shows multi-family MSW collection inventories and service frequencies as of December 2022 in Lake Forest.
Table 3: Commercial MSW Service Information as of Dec 2022 – Lake Forest 1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk 5x/wk 6x/wk 7x/wk Grand Total
2-yd split 2
1 3
2-yard bin 34 8 3 1 1 1
48 3-yard bin 120 185 133 44 69 33 6 590
4-yard bin 27 43 55 22 33 21 10 211
3-yard split 60 41 14 5 1 1
122
90-gallon cart 2
2 Grand Total 245 277 206 72 104 56 16 976
Table 4: Multi-Family MSW Service Information as of Dec 2022 – Lake Forest 1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk 6x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 1 2 11
14 3-yard 52 202 116 69
439
4-yard 3 6 40
1 50
3-yard split 2 20 7 5
34 6-yard
6 6
35-gal cart 4
4 65-gal cart 158
158
90-gal cart 6
6 Grand Total 226 236 174 74 1 711
Table 5 displays the number of MSW collection containers by container size and collection frequency for all commercial accounts as of December 2022 in Laguna Hills.
Table 6 shows multi-family MSW collection inventories and service frequencies as of December 2022 in Laguna Hills.
Item: 14
256
17 Table 5: Commercial MSW Service Information as of Dec 2022 – Laguna Hills 1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk 5x/wk 6x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 4 4 4 1 2 15
3-yard 45 58 95 35 50 18 301
4-yard 9 13 14 21 11 17 85
35-gal cart 4 4
60-gal cart 12 1 13
90-gal cart 35 1 36
Grand Total 109 76 114 57 61 37 454
Table 6: Multi-Family MSW Service Information as of Dec 2022 – Laguna Hills 1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk Grand Total
2-yd
5 6
11 3-yd
26 52 46 124
4-yd
7 3 10
60-gal 4
4 Grand Total 4 31 65 49 149
An online map of commercial and multi -family accounts, and their associated bin inventory and collection frequency, can be viewed by following the link below:
https://arcg.is/01i0fb0
Please note, to view map symbology that shows a different icon based on whether the account is commercial or multi -family and has recycling, MSW, and organics service, please ensure the file is being viewed in Map Viewer in your browser. This can be done by clicking the button titled ‘Open in Map Viewer’ in the upper-right of the browser window.
GIS layers can be provided for this dataset upon request from the Cities’ RFP Coordinator.
The current contractor has an exclusive contract to collect and process construction and demolition roll-off boxes within the City of Laguna Hills. The City of Lake Forest does not currently have an exclusive agreement for the collection and processing of C&D materials. (The Agreement included with this RFP includes exclusive collection and processing of construction and demolition roll -off boxes for both Cities by the selected Proposer.) Tonnage data for these activities in both cities is included in subsequent sections.
According to the official tonnage figures reported in CalRecycle’s Disposal Reporting System (DRS), a total of 26,734 tons were disposed in 202 2 from all collection sources within the City of Laguna Hills, with 53.24 tons of MSW from the City were reported as Item: 14
257
18 taken to the Long Beach SERF and processed as transformation. Lake Forest disposed of 87,441 tons in 2022 according to CalRecycle’s records. Note: Transformation will be disallowed in the new Agreement.
The current contractor reported disposing of the tonnages shown in Table 7, by collection sector, for calendar year 202 2 for both Cities . A portion of t he difference between the combined DRS disposal total of 114,184 tons and the disposal tonnage reported by the current contractor of 74,028 can be attributed to self-haul.
Table 7: Total Disposal Handled by CR&R in 2022, by Sector, for Both Cities Sector LF Tons Disposed LH Tons Disposed
Residential 22,060.66 6,268.2
Multi-Family 7,658.04 2,571.86
Commercial 19,834.14 8,510.22
C&D Roll-off 1,788.96 448.71
Roll-off 4,681.22 205.82
Total 56,023.03 18,004.81
2.2.2 Single-Family Residential Diversion Programs
The current contractor reports that as of December 2022, there are approximately 27,764 combined single-family billing accounts with active waste collection service between the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills . The single -family residential single -stream recyclable materials are delivered primarily to CR&R’s Western Ave MRF in Stanton where they are processed on a line designed for clean single stream materials. In 202 2, the current contractor reported collecting the tonnages shown in Table 8 from residential recycling, MSW, and co-collected organics containers.
Table 8. Residential Collection Tonnages by Stream for Both Cities Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Tons Percent Tons Percent
MSW 19,912.98 68% 3,746.46 33%
Recyclables 2,653.59 9% 2,885.25 25%
Co-collected Organics 6,892.58 23% 4,729.35 42%
Total 29,459.15 100% 11,361.06 100%
Using the reported tonnage, containers on service and the number of accounts collected, the approximate weight per gallon and per cubic yard ( i.e., density) for the three residential waste streams is as follows:
Item: 14
258
19 Table 9: Calculated Density Figures for Residential Material Streams for Both Cities
Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Lbs./gal Lbs./CY Lbs./gal Lbs./CY
MSW 0.47 95.12 0.36 72.51
Recyclables 0.11 21.70 0.17 34.02
Co-collected
Organics 0.16 32.52 0.28 55.64
NOTE: The above figures are provided for reference and each Proposer shall verify the above values, considering the diversion program(s) anticipated, and their own experiences.
In Lake Forest, the current contractor delivered 6,892.58 tons of residential co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings in 2022 to its composting facility in Yuma. In 2022, the current contractor delivered 4,729.35 tons of green materials to its composting facility from Laguna Hills residents. The City of Laguna Hills activated a curbside co -collected food scraps and yard trimmings recycling program on October 1, 2022. The current contractor collects bulky goods, e -waste, HHW, and white goods from residential customers in Laguna Hills at no charge. Lake Forest residents must pay for e-waste and white goods collection. Lake Forest holds two HHW collection events for residents. In 2022, 6.01 tons of HHW were collected at both events. A summary of program usage is included in Table 10 below.
Table 10. Special Services Requests for Both Cities
Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Tons/year # of
Requests Tons/year # of
Requests
Bulky items 394.4 13,258 171.27 2,486
E-waste 4.7 157 14.18 212
White Goods 23.74 796 16.48 404
HHW NA NA 13.76* 101
Total 422.84 201.93
*Represents average of FY 2021/2022 and FY 2022/23 HHW tonnage collected. Calendar year data not available from vendor.
2.2.3 Multi-Family Diversion Programs
According to the current contractor’s commercial account listing, there are 103 multi- family accounts in Lake Forest and 14 in Laguna Hills.
Table 11 below reflects the approximate number of recycling containers on service in the Item: 14
259
20 multi-family sector in Lake Forest . Table 12 below reflects the approximate number of food scrap recycling containers on service in the multi-family sector in Lake Forest. Table 13 shows multi -family yard trimming collection service inventory and collection frequencies for Lake Forest.
Table 11: Multi-Family Recycling Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Lake Forest
1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 12 9 12 33
3-yard 115 155 48 318
4-yard 1
1 2
3-yard split 7 24 3 34
35-gal cart 5
5 60-gal cart 2
2 90-gal cart 1
1 Grand Total 143 188 64 395
Table 12: Multi-Family Food Scraps Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Lake Forest
1x/wk 2x/wk 5x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 3 3
35-gal cart 219 219
60-gal cart 56 1 1 58
Grand Total 278 1 1 280
Table 13: Multi-Family Yard Trimmings Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Lake Forest
1x/week
35-gal cart 3
60-gal cart 10
90-gal cart 3
Grand Total 16
Table 14 below reflects the approximate number of recycling containers on service in the multi-family sector in Laguna Hills. Table 1 5 below reflects the approximate number of food scrap recycling containers on service in the multi-family sector in Laguna Hills.
Item: 14
260
21 Table 14: Multi-Family Recycling Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Laguna Hills
1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk Grand Total
2-yd
6 6
3-yd 14 29 14
57 4-yd
1 1
Grand Total 14 35 14 1 64
Table 15: Multi-Family Food Scraps Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Laguna Hills
1x/wk
35-gal cart 16
60-gal cart 11
Grand Total 27
Table 16 shows the collection tonnages broken out by material stream for the multi-family properties in both Cities for 2022. Please note, Laguna Hills multi-family tonnage reports did not break out food scrap diversion tonnages in 2022.
Table 16: 2022 Multi-family Tonnage, by Stream, for Both Cities Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Tons/year % Tons/year %
MSW 7,658.04 88% 2,571.86 93%
Recyclables 940.35 11% 206.33 7%
Food Scraps 118.86 1% 0 0%
Total 8717.25 100% 2778.19 100%
2.2.4 Commercial Diversion Programs
2.2.4.1 Commercial Recyclables Collection
The current contractor provides collection of single stream recyclable materials from commercial and business accounts that are processed on a single stream materials line at the current contractor’s clean MRF.
Table 17 summarizes the commercial recycling container inventory in Lake Forest. Table 18 provides the number, size, and collection frequency for commercial recycling containers in service in Laguna Hills. The current contractor uses split trash and recycling bins in both cities to service space-constrained commercial properties.
Item: 14
261
22 Table 17: Commercial Recycling Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Lake Forest
1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk 5x/wk 6x/wk Grand Total
2-yd split 2
1 3
2-yard 57 5 4 1 2 1 70
3-yard 161 141 75 19 28 25 449
4-yard 24 23 20 9 17 16 109
3-yd split 69 40 8 2 2 1 122
35-gal cart 5
5 60-gal cart 12
12 90-gal cart 14
14 Grand Total 344 209 108 31 49 43 784
Table 18: Commercial Recycling Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Laguna Hills
1x/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk 5x/wk 6x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 6 4 2
1 13
3-yard 35 42 47 13 17 2 156
4-yard 3 9 9 2 2 4 29
35-gal cart 5
5 60-gal cart 12 1
13 90-gal cart 29
1 30
Grand Total 90 56 59 15 19 7 246
Table 19 shows the collection tonnages broken out by material stream for commercial accounts in both cities for 2022. Please note, mixed waste recycling was discontinued in Laguna Hills in 2023 and will not be an allowable processing methodology in the next contract with the Cities.
Table 19: 2022 Commercial Tonnage, by Stream, for both Cities Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Tons/year % Tons/year %
MSW 22,881.91 87% 8,510.22 65%
Roll-off Recycling 310.54 1% 1,044.51 8%
Recyclables 2,247.28 8% 776.19 6%
Mixed Waste
Recycling 0 0% 2,478.47 19%
Food Scraps 1,001.03 4% 355.15 3%
Total 26,440.76 100% 13,164.54 100%
Item: 14
262
23 2.2.4.2 Commercial Food Scrap Collection
As of December 2022, the current contractor had the following food scrap service levels shown in Table 20 in Lake Forest. CR&R reported 192 commercial accounts with food scrap collection service in Lake Forest.
Table 20: Commercial Food Scraps Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Lake Forest
1/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk 4x/wk 5x/wk 6x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 12 13 8 1 3 3 40
35-gal cart 67 4 31 11 1 114
60-gal cart 82 27 36 3 5 2 155
Grand Total 161 44 75 15 9 5 310
The current contractor had the following food scrap service levels shown in Table 21 in Laguna Hills. CR&R reported 60 commercial accounts with food scrap collection service in Laguna Hills.
Table 21: Commercial Food Scraps Collection Service Information as of December 2022 – Laguna Hills
Row Labels 1/wk 2x/wk 3x/wk Grand Total
2-yard 6 1 6 13
35-gal cart 1
1 60-gal cart 41 9 24 74
Grand Total 48 10 30 88
2.2.4.3 Roll Off, Compactor and Temporary Bin/Cub Service
The current contractor collects permanent roll-off boxes and compactors from customers within both cities. (As previously noted, in Laguna Hills, CR&R has exclusive C&D service.
And, in Lake Forest, CR&R provides C&D service, however C&D service in Lake Forest is not exclusive to CR&R. The new Agreement provides for exclusive C&D service to be supplied by the selected Proposer in both Cities.) The total tons of collection for these lines of businesses are included in Table 22 below. Table 23 shows the number of loads for each container type in Laguna Hills in 2022. Lake Forest did not track this data.
Item: 14
263
24 Table 22: Annual Tonnage Collected in Compactors, Roll-off Boxes, and Clean-up Bins (CUBs) - Both Cities – Lake Forest includes only services provided by CR&R in the table below, not all non-exclusive contractors.
Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Tons/year Tons/year
Compactors and Commercial Roll-off 3,358.31 1,928.26
C&D 7,687.68 2,389.49
CUBs 1,713.12 309.64
Total 12,759.11 4,627.39
Table 23: Temporary and Permanent Bin Collection Loads in 2022 – Laguna Hills (this data not tracked by Lake Forest)
Residential
CUBs 311
10-yard temp bins 37
40-yard temp bins 65
Commercial
CUB 106
10-yd temp bin 59
40-yard temp bin 473
Permanent Compactor/RO Loads 298
Table 24 summarizes reported commercial densities by stream in lbs. per cubic yard.
Table 24. Commercial Program Densities On Service for both Cities Stream
Lake Forest Lbs.
per Cubic Yard On
Service
Laguna Hills Lbs.
per Cubic Yard On
Service
Commercial Single-stream Recycling 17 19
Commercial MSW 102 99
Commercial Food waste 106 212
NOTE: The above figures are provided for reference and each Proposer shall verify the above values, considering the diversion program(s) anticipated, and their own experiences. Discrepancies in densities could be based on overservicing.
Item: 14
264
25 2.2.5 Construction/Demolition Debris Diversion Programs
The City of Laguna Hills has an exclusive contract with the current contractor for temporary roll-off box service. As noted, Lake Forest does not have an exclusive system for roll-off and C&D. However, the new Agreement provides for exclusive C&D service to be supplied by the selected Proposer in both Cities. Both cities have construction and demolition ordinances, that require all covered projects to divert 65% of construction and demolition debris, measured in tonnage.
In 2022, in Lake Forest, 7,687.68 tons of C&D material were collected, 5,898.72 tons were diverted, and 1,788.96 tons were disposed to achieve a reported 77% diversion rate. In 2022, in Laguna Hills, 2 ,699.13 tons of C&D material w ere collected, 2,044.60 tons were diverted, and 654.54 tons were disposed to achieve a reported 76% diversion rate.
Item: 14
265
26 2.2.6 Other Diversion Programs
The current contractor operated the special collection programs summarized in Table 25 below.
Table 25: Summary of Special Diversion Programs Provided by Contractor in 2022 for Both Cities
Material
Collected
Lake Forest Laguna Hills
Collection Description Collection Description
HHW 6.01 tons in
2022
The City holds 2 annual drop-off
events open to all residents.
4.66 tons The City's contractor offers an at-
your-doorstep HHW collection
program. 101 residents took
advantage of this service in 2022.
Batteries
and
fluorescent
lamp drop
off
0.22 tons The City has CFL and battery drop-
off locations at the Civic Center
and Community Center.
Holiday
greenery
10.29 tons The contractor collects holiday
greenery for the 3-weeks after
Christmas on regular collection
days.
11.45 tons The contractor collects holiday
greenery for the 3-weeks after
Christmas on regular collection
days.
Stable
bedding
There is no residential stable
bedding program in Lake Forest.
767.28 tons The hauler collects stable bedding
from 146 curbside containers in
the Nellie Gail neighborhood.
Residents can place stable
bedding in their curbside green
containers.
Bulky items 394.4 tons The current contractor provides 2 bulky item collections per year
for residents and collects up to 4
bulky items or up to 20 bundles
or bags of yard waste at no
additional charge. 13,258
residents requested bulky pick-
ups in 2022, and1,693 multi-
family units requested bulky
pick-ups.
171.27 tons The current contractor provides 2
bulky item collections per year for
residents and collects up to 4
bulky items at no additional
charge. 2,486 residents requested
bulky pick-ups in 2022.
Item: 14
266
27 In addition to the diversion programs noted above, the current contractor also provides MSW and recyclable materials collection services at the City special events listed in Table 26 below.
Table 26: Summary of Special Events Where Service is Provided for Both Cities
Event Date City Rough
Attendance
4th of July Celebration July 4 LH 2,000+
Half Marathon 5K Memorial Day LH 2,000+
Movies in the Park Summer (4 per year) LH 2,000+
Heritage Day early October LH 2,000+
Concerts in the Park July - Sept (4 per year) LH 2,000+ Holiday Event Series December LH 2,000+
Chamber of Commerce
Car Show August LH 2,000+
Movies in the Park 3 per year each Summer LF 350 each night Concerts in the Park 3 per year in the summer LF 2,500 each concert
4th of July Parade July 4 LF 10,000+
Sports Park
Tournaments
24 events per year (2-day
tournaments, 24 weekends) LF 2,000+ per
tournament
Elf Yourself 5K Run November LF 3,000
Bunny Blast Easter LF 3,000
Summer Concert and Car
Show August LF 2,500
Spooktacular Event October LF 3,000
Snowfest January LF 2,500
2.2.7 Collection Fleet and Routing
The current contractor operates 19 collection vehicles in Lake Forest and 18 in Laguna Hills. Table 27 below summarizes the current collection fleet used to service the Cit ies’ residential, commercial, and multi-family sectors.
Item: 14
267
28 Table 27. Vehicles in Service for Both Cities
Vehicle Type Make -
Chassis Make - Body Fuel Lake
Forest
Laguna
Hills
Residential ASL Peterbilt McNielus/
Amrep CNG 9 6
Commercial FEL Peterbilt Amrep CNG 6 4
Bulky FEL Peterbilt Amrep CNG 0 1
Commercial ASL Peterbilt Amrep CNG 0 1
Commercial FEL -
Lightweight Peterbilt Amrep CNG 1 0
Commercial FEL - Food
Scraps Peterbilt Amrep CNG 1 1
Roll-off Peterbilt NA CNG 1 2
Bulky Container/ Delivery Ford Box Truck 1 2
Clean-up Bin 1
Total 19 18
Table 28 provides the routes that the current contractor operates in Lake Forest and Laguna Hills.
Table 28: Weekly Routes in Lake Forest and Laguna Hills
Route Weekly Routes in Lake Forest Weekly Routes in Laguna Hills Residential MSW 35 16
Residential Recycling 34 15
Residential Organics 24 7
Commercial MSW 30 24
Commercial Recycling 15 6
Commercial Food Scraps 6 6
Item: 14
268
29 2.2.8 New Developments within the Cities
The following project in Laguna Hills is anticipated to occur in the next 1-8 years.
• The Village at Laguna Hills Project is a mixed -use urban village redevelopment project that will be located at 24100 Laguna Hills Mall (site of the former Laguna Hills Mall). Construction is anticipated to commence in May 2024 and is expected to continue beyond the initial 8-year Term of the Agreement. This approved Project includes a combination of high -density residential, retail, office, lodging, entertainment, and open space and recreation uses. Project implementation involves the following: demolition of the existing and remaining mall building, a few free-standing building pads, and various hardscape improvements; development of approximately 225,000 square feet of new retail building space to accommodate retail, services, restaurants, a health club, and a 50,000 square -foot, 1,200-seat theater; development of five multi-story residential buildings (one mixed-use retail/ residential building and four residential buildings) containing a total of up to 1,500 dwelling units and associated structured parki ng wrapped into the buildings; development of four, four-story commercial office buildings totaling approximately 465,000 square feet; development of a 100 –150 room, five -story boutique hotel with ground -level retail space; development of a centralized Vil lage Park; development of numerous vehicular access, circulation and parking improvements, including new driveways, private streets and drive aisles, parking lots/areas, and parking spaces along key streets; reconfiguration and enhancement of existing park ing areas to remain; development of various site improvements that include the renovation of existing landscape areas and installation of new landscaping and pedestrian walkways and paths throughout the Subject Property; and removal, replacement and/or construction of utility systems necessary to support the Project.
The Village at Laguna Hills Mixed Use Project will involve the following development activities:
Demolition of the remaining mall building and certain free -standing building pads that formerly housed the Sears auto repair center, and the existing Nordstrom Rack (which will be relocated on site), Just Tires, and Firestone buildings. The free-standing building pads housing BJ’s Restaurant and Brew House, In -N-Out, and King’s Fish House will remain. Demolition of various hardscape improvements and removal of landscaping throughout the Subject Property will be required.
• Development of up to approximately 225,000 square feet of new retail building area for a total of up to 250,000 square feet of retail at full Project buildout. The retail uses will be provided in key locations throughout the Subject Property, including fre e-standing building pads along the Subject Property boundary, internally as anchor buildings, or integrated into hotel and residential buildings Item: 14
269
30 establishing vertical mixed -use project components. The anticipated retail uses consist of retail, services, restaurants, a health club, and a 50,000 square - foot/1,200-seat multi-screen movie theater. The total retail square footage includes retaining the existing BJ’s Brewhouse, Kings Fish House, and In -n-Out restaurants.
• Development of up to five multi -story residential buildings (one mixed -use retail/ residential building and four residential buildings), increasing the previously approved 988 dwelling units to a total of up to 1,500 dwelling units, and associated structured parking.
• Development of up to four, four -story commercial office buildings totaling up to 465,000 square feet.
• Development of a 100 -150-room upscale boutique, five -story hotel with ground - level retail space.
• Development of a +/- 2.6-acre centralized Village Park that will be privately owned, operated and maintained, but open to the public and Project residents, workers, and visitors. The Village Park will include a number of passive and active open space and r ecreation uses/areas, and various hardscape and landscape improvements.
• Development of numerous vehicular access, circulation and parking improvements, including new driveways, private streets and drive aisles, parking lots/areas, and parking spaces along key internal private streets. Proposed parking facilities also include t wo parking structures to be shared by the retail and office uses; a 5-story, 745-stall structure and a 4-story, 937-stall structure.
• Development of various site improvements that include installation of over 11 acres of new landscaping and nearly 6.5 miles of sidewalks and pedestrian walkways/paths throughout the Project.
• Subdivision of the Subject Property from 13 lots (existing) to 16 lots (proposed) to allow for the mix of uses and improvements.
• Removal, relocation, replacement and/or construction of new utility systems (water, sewer, storm drain, and other public utilities) necessary to support the Project.
For more information regarding this Project, a copy of the Village at Laguna Hills Mixed Use Project Development Agreement between the City of Laguna Hills and MGP Fund X Laguna Hills, LLC (Ordinance No. 2022 -1; adopted March 22, 2022) is available for review from the Laguna Hills City Clerk upon request.
Item: 14
270
31 The following projects are anticipated to occur in Lake Forest over the next 1 -8 years:
Projects with approved entitlements:
• The Meadows Residential Community – total of 541 single-family residences and 65 unit senior housing apartment project. Currently under construction. Estimated completion:
2024
• The Oaks Residential Community (Northeast) – Total of 223 single -family residences.
Currently under construction. Estimated completion: 2024. • Ascension Cemetery (24754 Trabuco Road). Expansion of Ascension Cemetery to include new burial areas and new 5,428 sf maintenance building. Estimated completion: 2024 • New Industrial building (25121 Arctic Ocean) New 12,500 sg industrial building. Estimated completion unknown. Project paused.
• Kingdom Hall Expansion (23016 and 23071 El Toro Road) Construction of two new religious facility buildings for a total of 6,624 sf. Estimated completion: 2024.
Projects under entitlement (not approved and no estimated date for completion):
• 26200 Enterprise Way. Proposal for demolition of existing 144,906 s building and construction of new 165,803 sf industrial building
• 26220-26160 Enterprise Way. Propos al for demolition of 3 existing office buildings and reconstruction of a new 164,300 sg industrial building to accommodate multiple tenants. • 26250 Enterprise Way. Proposal for demolition of a 76,978 sf two-story office building and construction of a 77,000 sf industrial building.
• 25650 Baffin Bay Drive. Proposal for expansion of an existing Extra Space Storage self - storage facility. Includes construction of a new 90,621 sf thee story self-storage building. • 29865 Canada Road. Proposal to rehabilitate one existing single -family residence to be used for a tree service’s administrative functions and remove a second residence and structures related to animal keeping; create parking areas for tree service vehicles and equipment and create concrete drying pad for wood chips. Add new 2,475 sf shade structure.
2.2.9 Weekly Lifts
The Cities have the following weekly ‘lifts’ (i.e., total number of service events per week) for the following sectors and commodities. This data, along with other data provided in the background section of this R FP, can be used by Proposers to identify cross - jurisdictional routing efficiencies gain ed through combining the two service areas (Lake Forest and Laguna Hills) as requested in Proposal Form 27.
Item: 14
271
32 Table 29: Weekly Lifts – Residential – Both Cities
LF LH Total
MSW 21,069 8,863 29,932
Recycling 20,959 8,918 29,877
Co-collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps 21,077 8,645 29,722 TOTAL 63,105 26,426 89,531
Table 30: Weekly Lifts – Commercial and Multi-family – Both Cities
LF LH TOTAL
Commercial MSW 2,673 1,358 4,031
Multi-family MSW 1,522 457 1,979
Commercial Recycling 1,713 576 2,289
Multi-family Recycling 711 130 841
Commercial Food Scraps 609 810 1,419
Multi-family Food Scraps 285 27 312
Commercial Yard Trimmings
0 Multi-family Yard Trimmings 16
16 TOTAL 7,529 3,358 10,887
Item: 14
272
33 3 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
3.1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
The Cities will award the new Agreement for a period of eight (8) years. The selected Proposer will have the opportunity to earn up to two one-year extensions of the Agreement if specific performance measures are met.
3.1.1 Agreement
Proposers must be willing and able to enter into an Agreement with each City (Lake Forest and Laguna Hills) to provide collection , processing, disposal and diversion services for an eight (8 ) year period at a specified cost and under specified terms. The selected Proposer will sign a contract with each City. The Agreement is in Section 6 of this RFP.
Where tonnages or other City-specific information appears in the Agreement, the figures or text for each City is noted in brackets and bold font. It is recommended that Proposers carefully review the Agreement terms with their legal counsel. If Proposers take exception to any of the terms of the Agreement in Section 6, the Proposer must list each exception on Proposal Form 20 “Exceptions to Agreement.” Any exceptions to the Agreement will be considered as part of the evaluation process. If selected, a Proposer must be prepared to sign the Agreement in Section 6 with each City, with the exceptions listed on their Proposal Form 20. Failure to do so will result in disqualification and the Cities may select the next ranked Proposer.
3.1.2 Diversion Collection Services
The selected Proposer will provide the following diversion collection services in the Cities.
These plus the other programmatic requirements are provided in Attachment B Scope of Work.
Residential: Single stream recycling program and co-collection of food scraps and yard trimmings. Collection of stable bedding from residential households.
Multi-Family: Single-stream and single -material recycling program , yard trimmings program, s ource-separated food scrap collection program , and co-collection of food scraps and yard trimmings.
Commercial: Single-stream and single -material recycling progra m, y ard trimmings program, s ource-separated food scrap collection program , and co -collection of food scraps and yard trimmings.
Item: 14
273
34 C&D: Construction and demolition waste diversion program
Other Services: Holiday greenery collection, HHW collection, bulky goods including white goods collection program, sharps program, Cities’ facilities’ diversion program, compost giveaway events, compost workshops, special events/large venue diversion program, and related public education programs.
3.1.2.1 Residential Diversion Programs
Per SB 1383, the provision of a residential co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings was implemented on July 1, 2021 in Lake Forest and October 1, 2022 in Laguna Hills .
The provision of a residential co-collected program will continue to be required in the new Agreement.
Proposers shall provide rates for 35, 65, and 95-gallon residential carts for co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings, single stream recyclables, and MSW service in Proposal Form 29 “Proposed Rates to be Charged,” which will become Attachment D-1 to the final Agreement. The default size for all th ree residential carts will be 9 5-gallons, with customers having the option to ‘upsize’ or ‘downsize’ any service line at their discretion.
The basic Residential rates shall include one MSW Cart, up to two Recycling Carts and one co -collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps Cart. (See Attachment B of the Agreement for the required customer survey to determine customer-selected cart sizes.) Proposal Form 2 9 requires P roposers to provide rates for the following residential diversion service lines:
• 35, 65, and 9 5-gallon single stream recycling service, one or two Carts per Residential Customer included in Residential rate
• 35, 65, and 95-gallon co-collected yard trimmings and food scraps processed at a composting facility, one Cart per Residential Customer included in Residential rate • 35, 65, and 95-gallon MSW collection service, one Cart per Residential Customer included in Residential rate
Note: The Cit ies are requiring that Proposers provide a variable rate for the different residential MSW container sizes such that smaller MSW container service is offered at a lower cost than the larger MSW container options to reflect the reduction in disposal costs associated with smaller container volumes. This variable rate structure is not required for recyclable materials and co-collected food scraps and yard trimming collection services.
Item: 14
274
35 In other words, the basic rate for residential collection will be proposed for the following categories:
• One 95-gallon MSW cart with one or two recyclables carts of any size, and one food scrap/yard trimmings cart of any size
• One 65-gallon MSW cart with one or two recyclables carts of any size, and one food scrap/yard trimmings cart of any size
• One 35-gallon MSW cart with one or two recyclables carts of any size, and one food scrap/yard trimmings cart of any size
Effective July 1, 2025 , the selected Proposer will provide a residential single stream program with processing at a clean MRF and a co-collected residential food scraps/yard trimmings collection program with processing at a composting facility or an anaerobic digestion facility . Proposers shall provide residential rates for both composting and anaerobic digestion processing methodologies in Proposal Form 29.
Per AB 1594, the City will not consider rates that include use of ADC as a means to process and dispose of yard trimmings or any other material collected in the Cities (See Article 7 of the Agreement in RFP Section 6 for the prohibition on use of materials collected in the Cities for ADC.) In Proposal Forms 16 and 17, Proposers will describe their proposed residential Food Scrap and Yard Trimmings collection/processing technology.
Proposal Form 2 9 “Proposed Rates to be Charged ” requires Proposers to list the key assumptions made in proposing the cost of different dive rsion services , including collection costs, processing costs, disposal costs, and capital costs.
The selected Proposer will be required to provide replacement food scrap kitchen pails to residents using the rates in Proposal Form 29 “Proposed Rate to be Charged.” Proposers shall include specifications for the type of kitchen pails that they propose to use , and information for how they plan to distribute these containers to residents who request a replacement, in Proposal Form 23 “Kitchen Food Scraps Container.”
3.1.2.2 Commercial and Multi-Family Diversion Programs
The principal diversion collection services to be provided for all multi-family properties include:
• Single-stream recyclables collection, AND
• Food scrap diversion collection, OR
Item: 14
275
36 • Yard trimmings collection OR
• Co-collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps
The principal diversion collection services to be provided for commercial businesses include:
• Single-stream recyclables collection, AND
• Food scrap diversion collection, OR
• Yard trimmings collection OR
• Co-collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps
Multi-family properties and commercial businesses that can document a yard trimming recycling program provided through their landscaping contractor that meets SB 1383 requirements for diversion will not need to obtain collection service from the selected Proposer for yard trimmings, following appropriate verification by the Cities.
These same services shall also be provided to all temporary bin, temporary roll off and permanent roll off customers and all compactor customers.
The cost of reducing the amount of MSW that goes into the landfill (as required by AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826 and SB 1383) can be allocated across the entire rate base.
Based on analysis conducted by the Cities and their consultant, a rate for diversion services that is 50% of the cost of equivalent MSW service provides a sufficient cost-incentive for generators in the commercial and multi -family sectors to incorporate state-mandated diversion programs.
The rates proposed for the collection and processing of divertible materials collected from commercial and multi -family, including single-material recyclable materials, single -stream recyclable materials, yard trimmings and food scrap recycling, commercia l and multi -family co -collected yard trimmings and food scraps, shall provide a 50% rate incentive to equivalent MSW service.
Per the requirements of SB 1383, all customers must have both a recyclable material and a food scrap/yard trimmings recycling program in place unless the customer has received a City-issued de minimis and/or physical space constraint waiver . Both Cities adopted a mandatory local ordinance requiring businesses to implement SB 1383 -mandated programs. The ordinances will complement the selected Proposer’s efforts in effectuating Item: 14
276
37 the adoption of food scrap and yard trimmings diversion programs at all commercial and multi-family properties. As noted in the background sections, both Cities have near full participation in SB 1383 programs. The Cities anticipate that the focus during the term of the Agreement will be to increase generator participation in the programs, reduce contamination, and to ensure all enclosures have containers and are receiving a minimum of weekly collection service for all 3 streams (MSW, recycling, and food sc raps/yard trimmings) per the regulatory requirements.
The detailed Scope of Work for each of the above-mentioned services is contained in Attachment B of the Agreement. Proposers are encouraged to carefully review all of the programs required in the Scope of Work.
The selected Proposer will be required to provide one (1) internal collection receptacle to businesses upon request by the customer. Proposers shall include specifications for the type of internal collection container that they propose to use in Proposal Form 24 “Commercial Internal Food Scrap Container.”
3.1.3 MSW Collection Services
The selected Proposer will provide solid waste collection services for residential, commercial, and business establishments within the Cities as more fully described in the Scope of Work contained in Attachment B of the Agreement. Residential MSW collection will be once weekly, automated collection. The base residential service includes collection of one MSW cart, up to two (2) single stream recycling carts, and one co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings cart each with 35, 65, or 95 gallons in capacity once per week.
Residential customers can also add an additional, third (or more) single stream recycling carts, a second (or more) MSW carts, and a second (or more) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings carts at an additional charge at the rates that will be in Attachment D.
As noted above, Proposers shall provide variable rates for different sized Residential MSW carts in Proposal Form 29 “Proposed Rates to be Charged.”
Commercial cart and bin service, roll-off, and compactor services will be provided by the selected Proposer. Roll-off and compactor service may be on a regular schedule or may be completely "on-call", at the discretion of the customer. The Scope of Work for each of these programs is contained in Attachment B of the Agreement.
3.1.4 Cross-jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies
Collection efficiencies will be gained through cross -jurisdictional routing for commercial and residential services, including special services such as bulky item collection, e-waste collection, HHW, white goods, etc. The Cities’ consultant estimates that these cross - jurisdictional routing efficiencies can reduce costs by $1.5 - $3.0 million per year through the need for fewer collection vehicles, the elimination of routes due to combined collection efficiencies, less fuel usage due to eliminated routes, and other factors. Proposers will be Item: 14
277
38 required to complete Proposal Form 27 quantifying how cross -jurisdictional collection route efficiencies will reduce the cost of providing collection service and how these cost savings will be passed along to ratepayers. Proposers shall factor these cross - jurisdictional routing efficiencies into the rates in Proposal Form 29a, where indicated.
To further maximize commercial and multi -family efficiencies and reduce truck trips on the Cities’ streets, the City is requiring that cart grippers be installed on commercial front- loaders to allow them to also service Commercial and Multi -family MSW, Food Scraps, Recyclable Materials, and Co -Collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Carts on the same route as Bin customers for these commodity types. The Cit ies are requiring that Proposers indicate the number of front loader Commercial collection vehicles will be outfitted with cart grippers to service both Bin and Cart Customers on the same route in Proposal Form 27.
3.1.5 Cross-jurisdictional Routing Tonnage Allocations
Proposers will be required to install and maintain on-board scales for all commercial front- end loader collection vehicles. These scales will record the gross weight of the containers collected and ‘net out ’ the container weights to determine the net weight of materials collected at each commercial account. The on-board scale data will be used to determine exact weights of materials collected at commercial and multi -family bin customers for each City that will be included in Proposer-provided reports. The Proposer’s plan to incorporate on -board scales shall be included in Proposal Form 30. For residential accounts and commercial cart customers that are collected on cross-jurisdictional routes, Proposer shall use the allocation methodology provided in Attachment CC to the Agreement.
The Cities are also required to collect tonnage data that is accurately divided between commercial and multi-family customers. To this end, the Agreement requires that the selected Proposer has on-board scales installed on all vehicles that service mixed commercial and multi-family collection routes such that the weights of containers serviced in each sector and can accurately reported based on data collected from on- board scales.
3.1.6 Processing Facilities
NOTE: Proposal Form 2 9 “Proposed Rates to be Charged ” requires all Proposers to submit rates for the types of processing facilities described below.
Proposers must use a Clean Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). This can be a facility owned by the Proposer or a facility where the Proposer has a written agreement that ensures adequate processing capacity and a delivery schedule that will meet the needs of the Cities. The Clean MRF must include processing lines for cleanup of single material recyclables and the sorting of single stream recyclables. See Section 7 of the Agreement for the minimum guaranteed annual MRF capacity the selected Proposer must provide.
Item: 14
278
39 As noted, Proposer s will be required to provide residential rates for residential co - collected food scraps and yard trimmings taken to both 1) a composting facility, and 2) an anaerobic digestion facility. The Cities will decide which type of processing they desire for the co -collected food scraps and yard trimmings as part of the proposal evaluation process. Both the Anaerobic Digestor and the Composting Facility must be capable of processing Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings collected from residential customers.
For commercial and multi -family food scraps, Proposers shall select which type of processing facility they will use for commercial and multi -family food scraps, yard trimmings, and co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings (i.e., composting, anaerobic digestion, or co-digestion). Proposers will use the dropdown menus provided in Proposal Form 29 for rate tables 2-5, 8-10, 13-15, and 20. Proposers may choose the most cost - effective organics processing methodologies for materials collected on the commercial and multi-family routes.
Detailed information regarding the proposed processing facility for commercial and multi- family organics, including gate fees and transfer costs, shall be provided in the tab titled ‘Assumptions’ in Proposal Form 29. Proposers shall include in the description of their proposed Processing Facilities, how Food Soiled Paper and Compostable Plastics will be handled. See Article 7 of the Agreement for the minimum guaranteed annual food scrap/yard trimmings processing capacity the selected Proposer must provide.
The Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility must be capable of processing all the construction and demolition debris that is collected by the selected Proposer in the Cit ies and must also be capable of achieving the CALGreen facility diversion rate of 65% or higher. Should the diversion rate established by CALGreen and/or the Cities be increased, the selected Proposer is required to meet or exceed the new diversion rate.
As noted in the background section, there are several equestrian residential neighborhoods in the Cities, including Nellie Gail in Laguna Hills, that currently place stable bedding in the curbside co -collected yard trimmings and food scraps container.
Proposers will be required to provide pricing for residential stable bedding collection service, both via curbside Cart collection and via 3-yard bin service, in Proposal Form 29.
Proposers shall complete Proposal Form 26 to provide detailed information about the facility to which stable bedding materials will be delivered.
Proposal Forms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 26 are to be used to provide detailed information and costs for each of the processing facilities to be used. Please note that for these proposal forms to be considered complete, the forms must include either a statement that the facility (MRF, Compost Facility, C&D Processing Facility, etc.) is owned by the Proposer, or must include a signed agreement between the Proposer and the facility Item: 14
279
40 owner stating the capacity reserved for the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills , the dates (timeframe) for which the capacity is guaranteed for the Cit ies, the tons, delivery times, and details of processing equipment and methods that will be used, expected residue percentages based upon actual facility experience, gate fee, transport costs, and markets where the materials will be sold. All proposed processing facilities must be fully permitted by the date of submittal of proposals in order for Proposal Forms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 26 to be considered as responsive and complete.
3.1.7 Diversion Requirements
3.1.7.1 Incentives
The selected Proposer will have the opportunity to earn up to two, one-year extensions of the Agreement, provided that they are in compliance with all the terms of the Agreement and meet specified implementation metrics. The implementation metrics reflect the requirements and timelines of existing laws as they are known as of the date of issuance of this RFP. These include AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383. See Article 10 of the Agreement for a detailed description of the metrics. See also Attachment B to the Agreement for program details and for what constitutes a “fully implemented” program at each customer. The metrics for earning the Extension Incentives contained in the Agreement are as follows:
a. Phase 1 – Contamination levels of 25% or lower for all streams by December 31, 2027
1. Achievement of rates of contamination for all of the following residential, commercial, and multi-family material streams:
a. Maximum of 25% Contamination in all co-collected
food scrap s and yard trimming and/or source -
separated food scraps and/or source -separated yard
trimmings streams
b. Maximum of 25% Contamination in all recyclable
material streams
c. Maximum of 2 5% Contamination in MSW.
(Contamination limit is a combined maximum of 25%
recoverable food scraps and/or yard trimmings and
recyclable materials in MSW stream)
ii. If the selected Proposer achieves the Phase 1 metrics, it earns a one- year extension of the Agreement to June 30, 2034.
iii. If the selected Proposer fails, it does not earn one-year extension and Agreement would terminate on June 30 , 2033 (unless the Phase 2 extension is earned).
Item: 14
280
41 b. Phase 2 – Contamination levels of 15% or lower for all streams by June 30, 2030
1. Achievement of Contamination levels for all of the following residential, commercial, and multi-family material streams:
a. Maximum of 15% Contamination in all co -collected
food scraps and yard trimming and/or source -
separated food scraps and/or source -separated yard
trimmings streams
b. Maximum of 15% Contamination in all recyclable
material streams
c. Maximum of 15% Contamination in MSW.
(Contamination limit is a combined maximum of 15%
recoverable food scraps and/or yard trimmings and
recyclable materials in MSW stream)
ii. If the selected Proposer achieves the Phase 2 metrics, it earns an additional one-year extension to June 30, 2034 or June 30, 2035 (if the Phase 1 extension was earned).
iii. If the selected Proposer fails, it does not earn the Phase 2 one-year extension and the Agreement terminates on June 30, 2034 (if the Phase 1 extension was earned) or June 30, 2033 (if neither of the Phase 1 or 2 extensions were earned).
See Agreement Attachment N for how the Cities will evaluate whether or not the selected Proposer has achieved the required metrics to earn either the Phase 1 and/or the Phase 2 Extension Incentives.
3.1.7.2 Minimum Performance Standards
Agreement Section 10.02 contains the Minimum Performance Standards the Proposer must achieve. If not achieved, the Agreement requires the selected Proposer to pay for the Cities to implement the required SB 1383 programs that the selected Proposer did not implement and/or to take actions to reduce contamination to the required levels. The key Minimum Performance Standards are:
• Attainment of at least 95% SB 1383 diversion program implementation by June 30, 2026 for Commercial, including Multi-family with centralized collection service, and continuation at this level or higher throughout the entire term of the Agreement. • Achieve lower than 30% contamination for all Residential, Commercial, and Multi- Family streams during Phase 1 of the Agreement (beginning July 1, 2026 through December 31 , 202 7) and maintain at or below 30% contamination levels throughout the entire term of the Agreement).
Item: 14
281
42 • Achieve lower than 20% contamination for all Residential, Commercial, and Multi- Family streams during Phase 2 of the Agreement (on or before January 1, 2029) and maintain at or below 20% contamination levels throughout the remaining term of the Agreement).
A summary timeline of the contractual contamination caps is included below.
3.1.8 New Containers to be Provided
The selected Proposer will purchase new Containers as described in the Agreement and Attachment E, and shall distribute the Containers to residential, commercial and multi - family customers pursuant to the schedule and requirements in Attachment B “Scope of Work”, Section 1. Proposers shall utilize Proposal Form 12 “Numbers and Types of Containers to be Furnished by Contractor” to list the number, sizes, style, color and type of Containers that will be purchased.
As described in Attachment E-1, all Residential containers shall include at least 10% post- consumer recycled content and 50% post -industrial recycled content. Residential containers shall also include bar codes, RFID tags, and/or serial numbers for identification purposes.
3.1.9 Alternative Fuel Vehicles
The Proposer must provide new Collection vehicles as specified in Section 8.03 A of the Agreement. The vehicles must be alternative fuel vehicles as defined in the Agreement.
Item: 14
282
43 The selected Proposer will be required to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1193, and all other applicable state and federal laws with regard to air quality and vehicle emissions, throughout the term of the Agreement.
3.1.9.1 Provision of One (1) Battery Electric Collection Vehicle and Compliance with Advanced Clean Fleet Requirements
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Advanced Clean Fleets regulation will require 100% of refuse vehicles that are part of a fleet of 50 or more vehicles to be zero emissions by 2042. This regulation was adopted by CARB in April 2023 and, as of the date of the release of this RFP , the regulat ion is under review by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). While 2042 is not within the term of this agreement, the Clean Fleets program requires 10% of the heavy -duty refuse vehicles to be ZEV by 2030 (Contract Year 5) and 25% to be ZEV by 2033 (Contract Year 8). If Proposer’s fleet exceeds 50 vehicles, Proposer shall provide its plan to comply with the Advanced Clean Fleets requirements in Proposal Form 32.
The selected Proposer will purchase and deploy one (1) electric collection vehicle for use in the two city-area. Proposers must specify the optimal duty -cycle/route for the electric vehicle, which may include heavy -duty collection routes such as residential or roll -off collection or medium -duty, auxiliary routes such as bulky collection, cart washing, bin deliveries, HHW/U-waste collection, etc. The electric vehicle must be selected from one of the milestone groups included in th e Advanced Clean Fleet program table shown in Proposal Form 32. Proposers shall provide information about the electric collection vehicle they propose to provide , including details regarding charging station installation pricing, permitting and timeline, operating costs, procurement timeline, back -up plans, etc. in Proposal Form 10 “Electric Collection Vehicle to Be Furnished by Contractor by 7/1/2025.”
3.1.10 Billing
The selected Proposer shall prepare all bills, collect all payments, and utilize standard procedures to collect bad debts for all customers, including residential, commercial and roll-off. Billing will be rendered monthly for all commercial/multi-family lines of business and quarterly for residential service lines . These billing requirements are more fully described in Attachment B of the Agreement.
Proposer shall bill commercial and roll off/compactor customers on a monthly basis, collect all payments, and utilize standard procedures to collect bad debts on commercial and roll-off/compactor accounts.
Item: 14
283
44 3.1.11 One (1) Full-Time Recycling Coordinator in Laguna Hills, Two (2) Full- Time Recycling Coordinators in Lake Forest
The selected Proposer will provide one (1) experienced Recycling Coordinator on a full- time (1.0 FTE) basis to work on programs for the City of Laguna Hills and two (2) full-time Recycling Coordinators to work on programs for the City of Lake Forest. The tasks to be performed by the Recycling Coordinators are listed in Section 8.05 H of the Agreement, and in Attachment B and Attachment AA.. For each day the City, or Cities, do not receive the full-time services of the Recycling Coordinator(s) the liquidated damages listed in the Agreement will apply.
3.1.12 Implementation Plan
On Proposal F orm 13 “Implementation Plan ”, Proposers will provide a detailed implementation plan beginning with the award of the Agreement through March 31, 2026.
The Plan shall include a detailed schedule of all tasks to be completed prior to the commencement of collection operations on July 1, 2025 , and the key tasks to be performed thereafter.
3.1.13 Use of Innovation in Implementation of Diversion Services
Proposer’s use of, and experience with , bin monitoring technology, cloud -based data management of collection, fleet electrification, and dynamic frequency of collection adjustments and routing are important to the Cities.
It is expected that the selected Proposer will show a high level of technical ‘know-how’ as it applies technology and innovation to its diversion programs. Section 8.03 of the Agreement provides additional direction for the incorporation of innovation into collection operations. Proposal Form 9 “Plan to Provide Light -weight Collection Vehicle ” shall be used to describe the Proposer’s plan to provide light-weight collection vehicles. Proposal Form 10 “Electric Collection Vehicle s to Be Furnished by Contractor ” shall be used to provide information regarding the model, cost, and specifications of the proposed electric collection vehicle to be furnished by the selected Proposer. Proposal Form 11 “Plans to Incorporate On -board Technology to Increase Safety and Efficiency and for Contamination Monitoring” shall be used to describe the Proposer’s plan for including ‘on- board’ technology to make collection operations more efficient, safe, and cost -effective as required in Article 8 of the Agreement.
To maximize safety, Article 8.03.I of the Agreement requires the installation of collision avoidance systems on all collection vehicles.
Table 31 below describes the technology required on Proposer’s vehicles. These requirements are described in detail in Sections 8.03.H, 8.03.I, 803.J, and 8.03.K.
Item: 14
284
45 Table 31: Summary of Required Technology on Vehicles Technology Description Vehicles
On-board
Scales
On-board scales to weigh
materials collected at point of
collection and to allocate
weights between Cities and
sectors.
All Front-end and Rear-end Loaders.
Collision
Avoidance
Technology
Technology to detect adjacent
pedestrians, cyclists, and
motorists in vehicle blind spot.
All collection vehicles in service in the
Cities.
Electric
Vehicles
Battery electric Zero Emission
Vehicle (ZEV)
Proposer must provide at least one
(1) Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) for
a duty-cycle of the Proposer’s
choosing as well as provide a plan to
comply with Advanced Clean Fleet
requirements during the term of the
Agreement
Light-weight
Vehicles
2-3 axle collection vehicle with
other modifications to reduce
GVWR.
All Front-end loaders (FELs) that
service commercial and multi-family
recycling customers must be light
weight
Cart gripper(s) Attachment to Front-end
Loader collection fork that
allows FELs to service both
carts and bins with the same
vehicle
Proposer’s choice for the number of
FEL vehicles outfitted with gripper
3.1.14 Edible Food Donation Programs – Selected Proposer to Cooperate and Assist with Cities’ and Regional Efforts
Per SB 1383, all cities are required to divert, via edible food donation programs, 20% of the edible food waste that was disposed of in 2014 , by the year 2025. The Cities are coordinating with local food pantries and regional food donation programs to ensure the Cities’ food service establishments have cost -effective and convenient access to edible food donation programs. The selected Proposer shall assist with the Cities’ efforts as described in Attachment B to the Agreement.
The selected Proposer will likely see a minor reduction in the tonnage of MSW and food scraps being contributed to programs as a result of the widespread adoption of state - mandated edible food recovery programs during the term of the Agreement. As noted elsewhere, Proposers shall conduct their own independent investigation and assessment of the impact of SB 1383 requirements on proposed operations and tons projected to be Item: 14
285
46 collected. The Cities make no warranty as to the quantity or quality of food scraps or any stream of materials that may be present during the term of the Agreement.
3.1.15 Provision of Bin Sensors
The Cities are requiring Proposers to provide rates for a pilot b in sensor program for interested commercial/multi-family bin-service accounts; and rates for an optional City - wide bin sensor program. Bin sensors will enable account managers to remotely monitor bin fullness levels, service confirmation, overflow events and to provide fullness insight over time to allow the ‘right -sizing’ of containers that are being overserviced. The Cit ies will have access to the information from the sensors for all accounts , and customers will have individual access to sensor data from bins associated with their account. To comply with state -mandated contamination monitoring requirements, the Cit ies are requiring camera-based bin sensor technology be provided by Proposers. Camera -based bin sensors can photograph bin contents, identify potential contamination types, send automatic alerts to customers when contamination or overages are detected, provide calculations for right-sizing collection service, and can monitor bin fullness in real-time. At this time, Pello sensors are camera-based. There may be other comparable vendors and technology available. In Proposal Form 25 “Bin Sensors to be Provided by Con tractor,” Proposers shall provide rates for both the pilot program and the optional City -wide program that are described for the implementation of bin sensors in the Cit ies. In Form 25 Proposers will describe the vendor and technology being proposed. Additional detail about the bin sensor program is included in Article 8.04.G.1 of the Agreement.
3.1.16 HHW and Sharps Collection Programs
The selected Proposer shall provide two (2) doorstep HHW, U-waste, E-waste, and sharps collections per single-family resident per year at no additional charge to the residents. Additionally, Proposer shall provide 2 annual HHW drop-off events, one in each City, where residents may drop-off HHW, e-waste, and u-waste. Proposers shall provide unlimited sharps collection for residents via a mail-back program. Proposers shall provide information regarding their proposal for the HHW and sharps collection programs in Proposal Form 3 1 “HHW and Sharps Collection Program Details.” Section 4.2.1 of Attachment B includes details regarding the HHW recycling program and Section 4.4 of Attachment B includes details regarding the sharps collection program.
3.1.17 Annual Bulky Item Collection Event
In addition to the two on -call Residential Bulky Item Collections per calendar year per Residential Customer, o nce annually in each City , Proposer shall arrange for a single - family residential curbside bulky item collection event by appointment that will allow local charity(ies) to have first right to salvage bulky items left out by residents. In addition, Proposer shall provide collection containers and staff for a 1-day bulky item drop-off at a Item: 14
286
47 centralized facility located in each City in the same week as the Bulky Item annual collection event. Bulky Item collection shall also be provided at multi -family complexes with enclosures. See Section 4.1.2 of the Scope of Work in Attachment B of the Agreement for the requirements for multi -family Bulky item services. Proposers shall provide additional information about Bulky Item services to be provided in Proposal Form
33. Item: 14
287
48 4 BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS
4.1 COMPENSATION TO SELECTED PROPOSER
The selected Proposer will charge customers not more than the maximum rates established for services rendered pursuant to the Agreement. The maximum rates will be the rates proposed by the selected Proposer in Proposal Form 29 “Proposed Rates to be Charged” for services that will begin July 1, 2025. Proposal Form 29 will become an attachment to the final Agreement.
The rates on Proposal Form s 29a-c will not be adjusted for inflation or otherwise between the submission of these proposal forms and the start of collection of services in July 1, 2025. Therefore the proposed rates must be in 2025 dollars.
Proposal Form 29 contains three (3) separate rate schedules. Proposal Form 29a is the main rate schedule that will be used at the inception of the Agreement and will contain the cross-jurisdictional efficiencies between the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills.
Proposal Forms 29b and 29c will serve as alternate rate schedules in the unlikely event that one of the Cities terminates its’ Agreement with the selected Proposer during the term of the Agreement . In such event, the rates for the remaining City that did not terminate its’ Agreement with the selected Proposer will become those in Form 29b or 29c (depending upon which City remains).
Proposers shall complete all 3 rate schedules for all rates . as part of Proposal Form 29 assuming the following three scenarios:
1) Proposal Form 29a. Proposal Form 29a must contain the p roposed rates to be charged assuming cross -jurisdictional efficiencies between the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills . The rate schedule in Proposal Form 29a, will become Attachment D -1 to the Agreement and will be used at the inception of the Agreement and throughout the term of the Agreement unless an Agreement with the selected Proposer is terminated by one of the Cities.
2) Proposal Form 29b. Proposed rates for the City of Lake Forest only, assuming no cross-jurisdictional efficiencies. The rate schedule in Proposal Form 29 b, will become Attachment D-2 to the Agreement).
3) Proposal Form 29c. Proposed rates for the City of Laguna Hills only, assuming no cross-jurisdictional efficiencies. The rate schedule in Proposal Form 29 c, will become Attachment D-3 to the Agreement)
Item: 14
288
49 The following three cost components shall be included in the rates charged to residents and businesses:
1. Regulatory Compliance Cost (RCC)
2. SB 1383 Procurement Compliance Costs for Compost and Mulch (PCC)
3. Pavement Impact Costs (PIC)
The Cities will provide via an Addendum to this RFP, the cost of each of the above three (3) components in the Agreement for each City. In Proposal Forms 29a-c, Proposers are required to allocate these three costs to each rate line item for each City. The City may adjust these costs based on changes in the actual costs incurred using the processes in Attachment W. Any changes in these costs incurred by the City will lead to adjustments in the cost components associated with each rate in Proposal Forms 29a -c per the methodology included in Attachment W.
In Proposal Forms 29a-c, Proposers shall fill in the rates for each level and type of service.
Rates must be broken down to show the collection cost, processing cost , disposal cost, and capital costs to calculate a ‘base rate’. To determine the rate for each City, Proposers shall calculate the Regulatory Compliance Cost component, SB 1383 Procurement Compliance Cost component, and Pavement Impact Cost component for each rate item based on the costs for these three components provided by the Cities and add these components to the ‘base rate’. The procedure for adjusting costs throughout the term of the Agreement appears in Article 14 of the Agreement. A sample calculation is shown in Agreement Attachment J. The disposal portion will only be adjusted as that cost actually changes. Disposal costs are a pass -through cost and cannot include any mark up, overhead or administrative costs. Note: Capital cost components of the rates will not be adjusted in future years.
The cost of reducing the amount of MSW that goes into the landfill ( which is required by AB 939 and SB 1383 ) can be spread across the entire rate base. As the amount of material being collected and handled is increasingly shifting into diversion, providing diversion services at no charge is no longer feasible and therefore is not permitted in Proposal Forms 29a-c.
Within the categories of: Residential; Commercial & Multi-Family; Permanent Compactor and Roll-Off; Temporary Bins; Temporary Roll Offs; Permanent Roll Off; Compactor and Special Events ; and Other Services ; the Proposer must fill in r ates for each of the following types of collection, processing and disposal services:
1. Collection of MSW hauled directly to the landfill.
Item: 14
289
50 2. Collection of single stream and single -material recyclable materials for processing at a Clean MRF.
3. Collection of source-separated food scraps and processing at a Composting Facility, Anaerobic Digestion Facility, or Bioengineered Feedstock Facility.
4. Collection of source-separated yard trimmings and processing at a Composting Facility or Anaerobic Digestion Facility.
5. Co-collection of food scraps and yard trimmings for processing at a Composting Facility or Anaerobic Digestion Facility.
Detailed information on these programs is contained in the attached Agreement and in Attachments B (Scope of Work) and A (Definitions).
The selected Proposer shall bill and collect revenues from customers. The revenue collected by the selected Proposer for these services along with revenues from the sale of diverted materials shall be the sole source s of compensation for services rendered pursuant to Section 14.01 of the Agreement.
4.2 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
The selected Proposer must perform all of the services included in the Agreement. For non-performance of specified services, the liquidated damages listed in Section 15.09 of the Agreement will apply.
4.3 ADJUSTMENTS TO COSTS
Article 14 of the Agreement describes the methods for adjustment of the collection and processing portion of the rates on an annual basis throughout the term, beginning on July 1, 2026. As noted above, the disposal cost is only adjusted when the actual landfill tip fee increases.
4.4 BONDS, INSURANCE AND GUARANTY
The selected Proposer is required to provide a performance bond and insurance coverage as described in Article 13 of the Agreement. The selected Proposer must also execute a Guaranty from either its parent company or its owner(s). The form and format of the performance bond appears in Attachments L and M of the Agreement and the Guaranty appears in Attachment Z.
Item: 14
290
51 5 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION
This section describes (1) the evaluation process, (2) proposal evaluation criteria, (3) instructions on organization of information to be included in the Proposal Package, and (4) the timing of the award.
5.1 EVALUATION PROCESS
Proposals will be evaluated using the process described in this section. The selected Proposer will be chosen based on the outcome of this evaluation. The evaluation process includes the following activities, which are discussed below:
1. Review of Proposals for completeness and responsiveness to RFP.
2. Evaluation and analysis of each Proposal addressing each evaluation criterion listed in Section 5.2 of this RFP. This will likely include several rounds of questions to each Proposer to clarify items in their Proposal.
3. Cities’ staff and consultants discuss and compare the Proposals received using the evaluation criteria . The strengths and weaknesses of each proposal are analyzed and discussed. Reference checks are completed for each Proposer.
4. Interviews with Proposers. Each Proposer will be asked to make a 30 -minute presentation summarizing their proposal, qualifications, experience, and proposed approach. Then specific questions will be asked of each Proposer team to further clarify points in the proposal , and to learn more about each Proposer team and their approach to fulfilling all the Agreement requirements.
5. Award of Agreement by each City Council. A contract will be awarded by the Lake Forest City Council. A separate contract will be awarded by the Laguna Hills City Council.
5.1.1 Review of Proposals for Responsiveness to RFP
In order to be considered responsive to the RFP, Proposers must have:
• Attended the mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference;
• Acknowledged receipt of, and agreement to follow , the City Council Process Integrity Rules by signing in person at the Pre -Submittal Conference or by an electronically signed “Docu-sign” document emailed to the Cities’ RFP Coordinator at the end of the Pre-Submittal Conference;
Item: 14
291
52 • Delivered the Proposal by the submission deadline; and • Complied with the requirements of the RFP, including the submittal of all forms completed in full.
If the requirements are met, Proposals will be considered responsive and will continue through the evaluation process. If the requirements have not been met, a Proposer shall be disqualified.
5.1.2 Evaluation
The Agreement will be awarded to the Proposer that offers the greatest overall value to the Cities, as determined by the Councils in their sole discretion. Overall value does not necessarily mean the lowest proposed rates. As noted above, responsive Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the criteria listed in Section 5.2. The criteria are not listed in any particular order of priority or importance.
5.1.3 AB 1669
State law requires that employees of the Cities’ current contractor be given an employment opportunity with the selected Proposer. Proposers shall use Proposal Form 22 “AB 1669 Statement” to declare their intention to offer, or not offer, employment to eligible employees of the current contractor according to the terms described in AB 1669.
As required by AB 1669, P roposers offering employment will be awarded a 10% preference in the evaluation process. In the event the incumbent contractor submits a proposal, the incumbent contractor shall also receive a 10% preference if it declares its intention to continue to provide employment to its current employees. Appendix 8 includes the text of AB 1669. See also Section 8.05.J of the Agreement.
5.1.4 Referendum
The successful Proposer will be solely responsible for the cost(s) of any special election(s) associated with a referendum petition on the award of an Agreement by either of the Cities. The Cities shall not be required to submit the award of an Agreement to a special election. However, if they do, the successful Proposer shall reimburse such City for the cost of the special election within thirty days of receipt of an invoice detailing such costs. These costs shall be paid regardless of the outcome of the election. The obligation in this sub section shall be in addition to the obligation to defend the award of the Agreement in Section 13.01 of the Agreement. Proposers shall include language as set forth in Proposal Form 1 accepting and acknowledging this obligation.
Item: 14
292
53 5.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Members of Cit ies’ administrative staff and technical consultants will evaluate all proposals. The proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
Table 17. Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Description
Organization &
Experience of Project
Team
References
• Organization chart and role of each team member in the project • Contractual arrangement among team members (if a joint venture or partnership)
• Explanation of how the local management and corporate structure are linked (if applicable)
• Key personnel assigned to the project and their experience in collection and materials diversion operations
• Number of total proposed FTE for providing all required services • Client references demonstrating Proposer's ability to maintain long-term relationships with local government agencies, including cooperation in providing requested information in a timely manner, compliance with contract requirements, responsiveness to city/county staff and customer issues, overall attitude and willingness to work as a team with cities/counties
Pending Litigation
and Assessment of
Liquidated Damages
• Number of claims and pending litigation matters, including analysis of types of claims alleged.
• Analysis of whether judgement or settlement unfavorable to the company would jeopardize the company’s ability to perform the requirements of the Agreement.
• Analysis of any trends indicating rates of vehicle collisions, property damage or other types of incidents are in excess of industry averages. • Liquidated damages assessed by a city, county or other governmental agency in last 3 years; analysis of number of times assessed, amounts and for what reasons
Agreement
Exceptions
• Number, nature and materiality of the exceptions taken to the terms of the Agreement.
Technical Capability:
Collection Operations
• Adequacy of proposed number and types of collection vehicles and reliability of collection equipment
• Adequacy of proposed number, sizes and types of carts, bins, split bins, and roll off boxes for the required services
• Number of proposed FTE drivers for all routes and vehicles • Consistency between number of assigned drivers and number of assigned collection vehicles for each type of route (e.g., residential, multi-family, commercial, and special services - HHW and bulky item collection, bin delivery, etc.)
• Number of proposed FTE of other personnel and adequacy to provide all required services
• Demonstrated experience in:
Item: 14
293
54 ➢ Implementation and administration of collection services for MSW, recyclables, yard trimmings, and food scraps from
residential, commercial, multi-family and institutional generators. ➢ Operation of special recycling programs such as HHW, sharps, textiles, bulky item and other similar collection programs. ➢ Minimum 3 years of experience providing reliable residential, commercial and roll-off collection services to a jurisdiction equal to, or larger in size, than the two-city area of Laguna Hills and Lake Forest.
➢ Maintaining accurate records and providing complete, accurate, and useful data to cities/counties on a consistent and timely basis.
• Maximization of cross-city routing efficiencies and provision of detailed calculations of route efficiencies and their corresponding reduction in rates
• Proposed collection technology:
➢ Proposed use of and experience with bin sensor technology, integration of sensors to produce cost-savings and increases in productivity of collection and processing.
➢ Proposed use of and experience with cloud-based data
connecting the Proposer, generator, and City for program implementation and service monitoring
➢ Selection of trucks that are specifically sized and specified to the collection of MSW, recyclables, and food scraps/yard trimmings
➢ Proposed battery electric vehicle and charging station and experience with the purchase, operation and maintenance of battery electric collection vehicles and permitting and installation of charging facilities.
➢ Proposed use of on-board scales as required by the Agreement. ➢ Proposer understanding of requirements for obtaining and recording data on actual tons collected from each City as well as from commercial generators separate from multi-family generators
➢ Proposed use of cart grippers for increased routing efficiency Special Collection
Services
• Proposed Sharps mail-back collection program
• Proposed Bulky Item collection and drop off programs
• Proposed HHW collection program
• Proposed Multi-Family Bulky Item collection program
• Proposed charity Bulky Item collection program
Technical Capability:
Processing &
Marketing of
Divertible Materials
• Operation or successful use of a fully permitted materials recovery facility
• Demonstrated ability to prepare high quality materials and sell into a dynamic and changing global economy. Ability to forecast changes in markets and adapt accordingly
• Proposed clean MRF:
➢ Processing capacity reserved for Cities
➢ Processing capabilities
➢ Residue percentage
Item: 14
294
55 ➢ Type and configuration of processing equipment
➢ Fully permitted as of proposal submittal date
➢ End markets for recovered materials
• Operation or successful use of a fully permitted composting and/or anaerobic digestion facility for yard trimmings, food scraps and any other organics identified as being diverted in the Proposal • Terms, duration and capacity reserved in contract for use of non- Proposer owned composting or anaerobic digestion facility (if applicable)
• Proposed composting and/or anaerobic digestion facility(ies):
➢ Capacity reserved for Cities
➢ Processing method(s)
➢ Fully permitted as of proposal submittal date
➢ Residue percentage
➢ End use(s) for diverted material(s)
• If anaerobic digestion facility is proposed, clear description of how digestate is further processed and end uses proposed for this material.
Lab test results for the final product produced from digestate showing fitness for use by agriculture and/or other proposed end users.
Evidence of required permits and all required approvals for end-use(s) of digestate.
• Ability of proposed food scrap/yard trimmings facility to accept/handle/screen out and/or process the following:
➢ Food-soiled paper. If not accepted what is done with this material
➢ Commercial food scraps in plastic bags and ability to remove contents from bags using bag-breaking technology
➢ Compostable/biodegradable plastics
• If applicable, operation or successful use of a fully permitted bioengineered feedstock facility including preparation of feedstock and use of Wastewater Treatment Facility or other such facility for conversion of feedstock to energy and/or other materials • Terms, duration and capacity reserved in contract for use of non- Proposer owned bioengineered feedstock facility
• Ability of proposed bioengineered feedstock facility to accept/handle/process or remove/screen the following:
➢ Food-soiled paper, or if unable, clear description of how food- soiled paper is removed and final destination for it
➢ Commercial food scraps in plastic bags and ability to remove contents from bags using bag-breaking technology; clear description of final use/destination for plastic bags
➢ Compostable/biodegradable plastics. Clear description of how such materials are handled and what is final destination for these materials
• Proposed bioengineered feedstock facility:
➢ Capacity reserved for Cities
➢ Delivery schedule confirmed by facility for Cities
➢ Fully permitted as of proposal submittal date
• Operation or successful use of a fully permitted C&D processing facility.
Item: 14
295
56 • Terms, duration and capacity reserved in contract for use of non- Proposer owned C&D processing facility
• Proposed C&D processing facility:
➢ Capacity reserved for Cities
➢ Processing equipment and configuration
➢ Third party audited/verified diversion percentage at proposed facility in 2021 and 2022
➢ End uses for diverted material(s)
• Operation or successful use of a fully permitted processing facility for stable bedding and manure. Method of processing:
➢ Capacity reserved for Cities
➢ Delivery schedule confirmed by facility for Cities
➢ Fully permitted as of proposal submittal date
➢ End uses for processed materials
• Terms, duration and capacity reserved in contract for use of non- Proposer owned stable bedding/manure processing facility:
➢ Capacity reserved for Cities
➢ Processing equipment and configuration
➢ End uses for processed materials
Customer Service • Demonstrated ability to provide high quality customer services over the duration of an 8-10 year Agreement.
• Number of FTE Customer Service Representatives (CSR’s) assigned to provide the services
• Method by which CSR’s are allocated or assigned to the Cities • Number of FTE CSR’s assigned for startup period
• Location of Customer Service call center
• Capability to meet metrics in Section 9.04. of the Agreement for telephone answering system, time on hold, number of transfers to get to a live CSR, etc.
• Capability to receive and respond to emails and texts from customers • Proposed training of CSR’s both initially and ongoing • Provision of two local phone numbers, one for Laguna Hills and one for Lake Forest
• Provision of interactive web site
• Capacity for online payments, billing and establishment of service/stopping service
Public Education and
Outreach
• Demonstrated ability to conduct public education services including an explanation of experience and copies/samples of materials produced for past programs, examples of the use of social media and other methods of outreach.
• Public education strategy for all subsectors of material stream (i.e., residential, multifamily, commercial, C&D, other as identified.) • Proposed communication between Recycling Coordinators, City Liaison, CSR’S and other personnel to result in comprehensive public education regarding all diversion programs and reduction of contamination in all streams
Start-Up & • Completeness, level of detail, and feasibility of Implementation Plan:
Item: 14
296
57 Implementation Plan ➢ Ability to meet implementation schedule ➢ Experience in starting up operations in a City the size of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills combined, or larger
➢ Documented ability to provide necessary equipment
➢ Plan for determining sizes of carts/bins to be provided for each residential, commercial and multi-family customer
➢ Plan for new container distribution and removal of old containers ➢ Staffing plan with detailed task descriptions for what personnel are assigned to each task
➢ Approach to coordinating the broad mandated program
diversion levels across the various residential, multi-family, and commercial generators
Reporting • Willingness, ability and past performance in thorough monthly and annual reporting of collected, diverted, and disposed tons, including providing detailed reporting from all processing facilities, landfills, and transfer stations.
• Detailed reporting on AB 341, 1826, and SB 1383 program implementation and tracking of results, training, and program maintenance follow-up schedules.
• Demonstrated experience with use of Recyclist/Smart 1383 or similar system
• Capability and dependability of Proposer to provide all information required by the Agreement that will become part of the Cities’ Implementation Record required by CalRecycle pursuant to SB 1383 Environmental
Responsibility
• Proposer’s plan to comply with California Air Resources Board Advanced Clean Fleets Program during term of the Agreement • Provision of residential carts containing the required percentage of post-consumer and post-industrial recycled plastic content Financial Capability • Financing capacity and strength
• Evidence that financing requirements will be fulfilled • Financial strength and stability of the Proposer to guarantee performance of the Agreement
• Demonstrated ability to accurately estimate collection and diversion program costs and results
• Demonstrated capacity to handle risk factors in the Agreement, such as fluctuations in market value of recyclables, variation of energy credits and interfacing with Wastewater Treatment Plants for co-digestion of bioengineered feedstock(s) (if applicable).
• Demonstrated ability to perform the scope of services in municipal contracts for the costs/rates agreed to in the Agreement • Demonstration of corporate ethics
Customized Local
Approach
• Proposal demonstrates an understanding of, and includes components to address, the unique characteristics, demographics and current conditions of Laguna Hills and Lake Forest
• Level of management staff assigned to the Cities, and the:
➢ Corresponding FTE of that/those positions
➢ Decision-making experience of that/those positions
Item: 14
297
58 ➢ Ability of that/those positions to manage day-to-day operations and troubleshoot problems confidently and promptly
• Proposal evidences a local, customized approach, and not a generic approach to providing the required services
Diversion Strategy • Does proposal maximize diversion rates and participation levels • Does proposal minimize contamination of recyclables, yard trimmings, food scraps, C&D waste
• Demonstrated ability to meet AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, AB 1594 and SB 1383 diversion requirements in another jurisdiction the size of the Cities of Laguna Hills and Lake Forest (combined) or larger • Number of FTE devoted to implementation and maintenance of diversion programs
• Types of training and educational programs for business and multi- family property managers and each generator’s operational staff • Demonstrated ability to hire and retain qualified Recycling Coordinators with proven track records of program implementation.
• Skill levels and experience of assigned Recycling Coordinators with diversion program implementation in other cities or counties • Types of training and educational programs for business and multi- family property managers and each generator’s operational staff • Reasonableness and technical feasibility of proposed diverted tons and percentages
Cost Evaluation • Proposed costs:
➢ Basic services
➢ Special services
➢ Proposed rates for divertible materials collection and processing services are 50% of the proposed rates for the equivalent size and frequency of MSW service
➢ Capital costs are clearly identified and cross check with vehicle and equipment costs and standard depreciation methods
➢ Proposal reflects a comprehensive diversion and
collection/processing approach and business model that will adequately address 75% diversion mandates during the term of the Agreement.
➢ Cost of battery electric vehicle and charging station installation ➢ Use of innovation to reduce costs
▪ Bin sensors
▪ Less expensive collection vehicles for single stream
recyclables
• Supporting documentation
➢ Completeness
➢ Reasonableness
➢ Clear cost buildups and assumptions included in Proposal Form 29 ➢ Clear documentation showing how innovations and/or sharing of incentives (i.e., HVIP) is used to reduce cost to ratepayers of providing service
Procedural
Compliance
• Proposer's compliance with:
➢ Requested proposal format and requirements
Item: 14
298
59 ➢ No additional or alternate programs proposed
➢ Adherence to City Council Proposal Process Integrity Rules ➢ Requests for additional information or explanation of proposal AB 1669 Employment
Offers to Incumbent’s
Employees
• Proposer’s willingness to offer employment to the incumbent contractor’s employees
Representatives of the Cit ies may contact references listed, and/or other public/private entities known to have contracted with Proposer, as part of the evaluation process.
The total annual cost for each Proposer’s services will be calculated by taking the proposed rates for each service and multiplying them by the approximate number of customers currently subscribing to each type and l evel of service. The resulting monthly dollar amount will be annualized and used to compare the total annual cost with the total annual cost of other Proposers.
5.3 PROPOSAL FORMS
Proposal Forms are included in Section 5.5 and request data in both narrative and tabular form. Proposers shall utilize the electronic versions of the forms, which are provided on the USB media included with this RFP packet. Completed forms must be returned with Proposals in both hard copy and electronic copy as described above in RFP Sections
1.3.1 and 1.3.2. Attach additional pages to Proposal Forms as necessary.
5.4 CITY COUNCILS’ AWARD OF AGREEMENT
As noted in the schedule contained in RFP Sections 1 and 3, the City Council s are scheduled to award an Agreement to the selected Proposer in Summer/Fall 2024.
Item: 14
299
60 5.5 PROPOSAL FORMS
Proposal Form 1: Proposal Transmittal Letter (Proposer to Retype On Company Letterhead) Proposal Form 2: Proposer Information
Proposal Form 3: Proposer Background and Experience
Proposal Form 4: Proposer References
Proposal Form 5: Names and Resumes of Key Personnel
Proposal Form 6: Structure of Project Team
Proposal Form 7: List of Contractor-Furnished Personnel G Proposal Form 8: New Collection Vehicles to Be Furnished By Contractor F1.1- F1.3
Proposal Form 9: Plan to Provide Light Weight Collection Vehicle F-2 Proposal Form 10: Electric Collection Vehicle to Be Furnished By the Contractor F-3 Proposal Form 11: Plans to Incorporate On -Board Technology to Increase Safety and Efficiency and for Contamination Monitoring
F-4
Proposal Form 12: Numbers and Types of Containers to be Furnished By Contractor E-2 Proposal Form 13: Implementation Plan C
Proposal Form 14:
Description of Anaerobic Digestion Processing Facility(ies) to Be Used for Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps and/or Co-Collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps (Including Letter Demonstrating Guaranteed Capacity and Ability to Receive Material) R
Proposal Form 15: Description of Materials Recovery Processing Facility(ies) – Clean MRF (Including Letter Demonstrating Guaranteed Capacity and Ability to Receive Material) O
Proposal Form 16:
Description of Compost Processing Facility(ies) to Be Used for Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps and/or Co -Collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps (Including Letter Demonstrating Guaranteed Capacity and Ability to Receive Material) P
Proposal Form 17: Description of Processing Facility(ies) – Bioengineered Feedstock (Include Letter Demonstrating Guaranteed Capacity and Ability to Receive Material) S
Proposal Form 18: Description of Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility(ies) to be Used (Including Letter Demonstrating Capacity and Ability to Receive Material) Q
Proposal Form 19: Pending Litigation
Proposal Form 20: Exceptions to Agreement
Proposal Form 21: Financial Statements
Proposal Form 22: AB 1669 Statement
Proposal Form 23: Kitchen Food Scrap Container GG
Proposal Form 24: Commercial Internal Food Scrap Container HH Proposal Form 25: Bin Sensors to be Provided by Contractor V Proposal Form 26: Description of Processing Facility(ies) – Stable Bedding (Include Letter Demonstrating Guaranteed Capacity and Ability to Receive Material)
BB
Proposal Form 27: Cross-jurisdictional Collection Routing Efficiencies X Item: 14
300
61 Proposal Form 28: Proposed Customer Service System OO Proposal Form 29: Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged D1- D3
Proposal Form 30: Use of On-board Scales to Accurately Report Tonnage Collected on Commercial and Multi-family Cross-jurisdictional Routes
DD
Proposal Form 31: HHW and Sharps Collection Program Details U Proposal Form 32: Proposers Plan to Comply with California Air Resources Board Advanced Clean Fleets Program during Term of the Agreement
KK
Proposal Form 33: Proposers plan for bulky collection day H
Item: 14
301
62 PROPOSAL FORM 1: PROPOSAL TRANSMITTAL LETTER (PROPOSER TO
RETYPE ON COMPANY LETTERHEAD)
[Date]
Christine Groves
Administrative Services Manager
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, California
Dear Ms. Groves:
In response to the Request for Proposals For the Collection, Transportation Processing and Diversion of Recyclable Materials and Other Materials and For the Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste dated November 21, 2023 [Insert name of Proposer] hereby proposes to provide said services in accordance with this Proposal, which includes the Proposal Forms and accompanying materials submitted with this Proposal in response to the Cities’ RFP.
The Proposer has thoroughly read and is familiar with the RFP, including all Appendices and any addenda thereto. The Proposer has conducted its own investigation and any research it deemed necessary to obtain additional data and/or verify the information contained in the RFP in order to submit this proposal.
The Proposer understands that the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills may reject any and all Proposals, negotiate prices and terms with one or more proposers, and may take other action as described in the RFP.
The Proposer assures the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills that the information contained in this Proposal, including the Proposal Forms, accompanying materials submitted with it, and all of the information contained in response to the Cities’ RFP is correct in all material respects.
Without limiting the foregoing, the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that it will be solely responsible for the cost of any special election called by the Cities of Lake Forest and/or Laguna Hills in the event a referendum petition is submitted to challenge the award of an agreement through this RFP process. More information regarding this obligation is set forth in Section 5.1.4 of the RFP.
The person signing this Proposal on behalf of the Proposer is authorized to do so as described in Section 1.3.3 of the RFP.
Sincerely,
[Name of Proposer]
By:
Name:
Title:
Item: 14
302
63 PROPOSAL FORM 2: PROPOSER INFORMATION
The following person(s) should be contacted concerning questions about the submitted proposal:
Company Name:
Contact Person:
Address: ________________________________
Telephone: _______________________________
Fax: _______________________________
E-Mail:
Cell Phone:
Type of entity (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, joint venture, etc.):
Date of incorporation or formation:
Historical synopsis (including organization and ownership structure):
Names of Company Officers:
• Chief Executive Officer:
• Chief Financial Officer:
• Chief Operating Officer:
Names of principal owners, general partners, managing partners or shareholders, if different from Officers:
Number of years operating experience in collection operations:
Item: 14
303
64 PROPOSAL FORM 3: PROPOSER BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
Describe the qualifications and experience of each member of the Project team related to the Project. If the Proposer is comprised of more than one company, describe the qualifications and experience for each company (team member) separately. Include the following information for each Project team member:
1. Brief overview of types of services currently provided by the Proposer.
2. The Proposer’s experience in providing Recyclable Materials, Food Scraps/Yard Trimmings recycling, and Solid Waste collection services. Include number of years involved in the field.
3. The Proposer’s experience in the operation and/or use of material recovery facilities, composting facilities, food scraps processing facilities, construction and demolition waste processing facilities, and if applicable, anaerobic digestion facilities and/or bioengineered feedstock facilities. Include number of years involved in the field for each type of facility.
4. Experience of Proposer in design and successful implementation of diversion programs to comply with AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, and SB 1383. Include the resulting program diversion rates as well as AB 1826 and AB 341 compliance rates.
5. Discussion of Proposer's health and safety experience and history of providing recycling and solid waste collection services, including workers' compensation experience modification factor.
6. Other information, as necessary, to substantiate that the Proposer has the capability to perform all of the services described in the Agreement included in the RFP.
7. Information on the Proposer’s use/experience with bin sensors, electric collection vehicles, cloud-based data management of collection, bin utilization, and dynamic ‘frequency of collection’ adjustments.
Item: 14
304
65 PROPOSAL FORM 4: PROPOSER REFERENCES
Provide three complete references of relevant business and project experience in providing Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Food Scraps/Yard Trimmings collection for public agencies. Include customer or project names, locations, project or service description, years services were performed, duration, and principal contacts.
1. 2.
3. Provide a complete list of references for all municipal contracts, held by Proposer in jurisdictions within California with a population of over 80,000 residents and over 500 commercial accounts. Include the municipality name and principal contact.
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Provide three complete references of relevant business and project experience in providing materials recovery facility, composting facility, food scraps processing facility, yard trimmings processing facility, and construction and demolition waste processi ng for public agencies. If Proposer has provided anaerobic digestion facility and/or bioengineered feedstock facility processing for public agencies and is proposing to provide such facilities and processing in this Proposal, include those references.
Include customer names, locations, project or service description, duration, principal contacts, etc.
1. 2.
3. Item: 14
305
66 PROPOSAL FORM 5: NAMES AND RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL
Indicate the names of the key personnel that will be responsible for collection operations and the areas of the management, operations, and line personnel listed below, along with their FTE. The key project personnel marked with star (*) below shall not be substituted without prior written permission from the Cities.
Office and Management Headcount (Number of FTE)
Position Description Name
Number
of FTE
(LF)
Number
of FTE
(LH)
Number of
FTE
(combined)
General Manager
Operations Manager
Contractor’s Representative for Legal
and Official Notices and Contacts
Manager of Recycling Coordinator(s)
Recycling Coordinator(s) (Agreement
Section 7.05.H)
Cities’ Day-to-Day Contact Person for
Customer Service Problems and Issues
(Agreement Section 8.05.I) *
Senior Manager(s) Responsible For
Marketing of Compost from Food
Scraps/Yard Trimmings (Agreement
Section 7.05.M) *
Dedicated Route Supervisor (Agreement
Section 7.05.N) *
Customer Service Manager
Customer Service Representatives
Dispatchers
Reporting and Compliance Supervisor
Maintenance Supervisor
Office Manager
Billing Specialist
Route Manager
Item: 14
306
67 Describe the experience of the key personnel related to collection operations, customer service and responses to Cities’ questions, concerns, troubleshooting, operations/customer liaison and Recycling Coordinator(s). Resumes will include the following information for each of the key personnel listed above:
1. Name
2. Role in proposed Project
3. Educational background and training
4. Number of years of experience in related field(s). Describe type of activities most usually undertaken, and names of jurisdictions served.
5. Experience directly related to role in proposed Project.
6. NOTE: Each of the key personnel listed in the Proposal Form 5 must also be shown in the organizational chart in Proposal Form 6.
Item: 14
307
68 PROPOSAL FORM 6: STRUCTURE OF PROJECT TEAM
Attach an organization chart to this Proposal Form for the proposed project team. Identify the individual who has overall responsibility for the project and the individual who will serve as the Proposer's representative. Include the names and titles of persons responsible for managing the collection operations, customer service center and operation, the day -to-day contact person to handle difficult customer problems and complaints for each City, Recycling Coordinator(s) for each City and troubleshooting of customer complaints in the field, and other major areas of responsibility. If the Proposer is a division or part of a larger parent company, list the names, titles and physical office location (city and state) of the persons that the local division management will report to in the parent company.
All Key Personnel identified in Proposal Form 5 shall be included in the organization chart.
Item: 14
308
69 PROPOSAL FORM 7: LIST OF CONTRACTOR-FURNISHED PERSONNEL Indicate the full-time equivalent of each position for the personnel that will be responsible for collection operations listed below.
If a staff person is partially allocated to the City (i.e., HHW collection driver), provide that percentage of the employee that is allocated to the City (i.e., half-time HHW driver would be shown as 0.5 FTE). Please break out proposed staff allocation between the Cities and provide a combined total FTE count for both Cities, as shown in the columns below.
Item: 14
309
70 Collection and Transportation Headcount (leave blank if the position is not proposed):
Labor Category
Number of
FTE (LF):
Number
of FTE
(LH):
Number
of FTE
(Total):
Residential Collection
MSW Drivers
Recycling Drivers
Co-collection Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Drivers
Residential Route Manager(s)
Other Residential Driver:
Other Residential Driver:
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL DRIVERS
Commercial and Multi-Family Collection
MSW Drivers
MSW Helpers
Recycling Drivers (Single Stream)
Recycling Helpers (Single Stream)
Source-Separated Food Scraps Drivers
Source-Separated Food Scraps Helpers
Co-collection Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Driver(s)
Source-Separated Yard Trimmings Driver(s)
Commercial/Multi-Family Route Manager(s)
Other Com/MF Driver:
Other Com/MF Driver:
TOTAL COMMERCIAL/MULTI-FAMILY DRIVERS
Roll-Off Collection
Roll-Off Driver(s)
Roll-Off Route Manager(s)
Other Roll-Off Drivers:
TOTAL ROLL-OFF DRIVERS
Miscellaneous Drivers and Support
Relief Drivers & Spares
Box Truck Drivers
Bulky Route Driver(s)
HHW Route Driver(s)
Container Delivery Driver(s)
Scout Service Driver(s)
Mechanics
Mechanics Helpers
Other Misc. and Support:
TOTAL MISC AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PROPOSED COLLECTION/TRANSPORTATION HEADCOUNT
This Proposal Form 7 will become Attachment G to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
310
71 PROPOSAL FORM 8: NEW COLLECTION VEHICLES TO BE FURNISHED BY
CONTRACTOR
Fill in the tables below with the vehicle type, manufacturer of truck and body, model year, route assignment, fuel type, cost for the new vehicles that will be placed in service on or before July 1, 2025, as well as number of FTE drivers. Provide the name, address, contact person and contact information for the manufacturer of the vehicles and the alternative fuel components of the vehicles. If any of the vehicles listed in the table below will not be alternative fuel vehicles, state the reason and the typ e of fuel that will be used. Include interest rate for capital financing for vehicles, the amortization/depreciation timeline, the anticipated date of purchase, and the expected timeline needed from vehicle purchase date to the vehicles being placed into service. Complete three vehicl e allocation tables showing the proposed vehicles assuming the following scenarios:
1. Table 8.1. Vehicle Allocation Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills
a. Indicate the approximate percentage that each vehicle will operate in Laguna Hills and Lake Forest
2. Table 8.2. Vehicle Allocation Needed to Service Lake Forest Only (assuming No Cross- Jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills)
3. Table 8.3. Vehicle Allocation Needed to Service Laguna Hills Only (assuming No Cross- Jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills)
Item: 14
311
72 Table 8.1. Vehicle Allocation Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills
Vehicle
Type
Manufacturer
Truck/Body Model
Year Route
Type of
Fuel
(e.g.,
CNG,
biodiesel,
LNG,
battery
electric,
etc.)
Cost
FTE Driver
(if not FTE,
include
percentage
FTE and
what other
duties they
are
assigned)
Approx.
% of
Vehicle
that
Operates
in Lake
Forest
Approx.
% of
Vehicle
that
Operates
in
Laguna
Hills
Truck Body
This Table 8.1 in Proposal Form 8 will become Attachment F-1.1 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
312
73 Table 8.2. Vehicle Allocation Needed to Service Lake Forest Only (assuming No Cross-Jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills) Vehicle
Type
Manufacturer
Truck/Body
Model
Year Route
Type of Fuel
(e.g., CNG,
biodiesel,
LNG, battery
electric, etc.)
Cost
FTE Driver (if
not FTE,
include
percentage
FTE and what
other duties
they are
assigned)
Truck Body
This Table 8.2 in Proposal Form 8 will become Attachment F-1.2 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
313
74 Table 8.3. Vehicle Allocation Needed to Service Laguna Hills Only (assuming No Cross-Jurisdictional Routing Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills) Vehicle
Type
Manufacturer
Truck/Body
Model
Year Route
Type of Fuel
(e.g., CNG,
biodiesel,
LNG, battery
electric, etc.)
Cost
FTE Driver (if
not FTE,
include
percentage
FTE and what
other duties
they are
assigned)
Truck Body
This Table 8.3 in Proposal Form 8 will become Attachment F-1.3 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
314
75 PROPOSAL FORM 9: PLAN TO PROVIDE LIGHT-WEIGHT COLLECTION
VEHICLES BY CONTRACTOR
All commercial recycling routes shall be serviced by light -weight collection vehicles.
Provide the following information concerning procurement and deployment of the light - weight collection vehicle(s) for collection of commercial Recyclable Materials:
1. The estimated capital and fuel cost -savings for the deployment of the light - weight vehicle(s);
2. The type, specifications, and manufacturer of the light-weight vehicle(s);
3. Photograph and/or schematic diagram of the light -weight vehicle(s) the Proposer will procure; and
4. Any other information related to the deployment of the light-weight vehicle(s) in the City.
This Proposal Form 9 will become Attachment F-2 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
315
76 PROPOSAL FORM 10: ELECTRIC COLLECTION VEHICLE TO BE FURNISHED BY
THE CONTRACTOR
Battery Electric Collection Vehicle to be Provided
Provide the following information regarding the proposed use of a battery electric vehicle (BEV) in the Cities, the proposed vehicle, and the proposed charging station infrastructure:
1. The Proposer’s experience using electric collection vehicles in other cities (if any).
2. The proposed make and model of the electric collection vehicle chassis and cab.
3. The make of the compaction system (if applicable).
4. The storage capacity of the proposed battery system, in kilowatt hours.
5. The payload amount of the proposed vehicle in tons and cubic yards.
6. The estimated range, in miles, of the collection vehicle as well as the number of containers or stops the vehicle is able to service during a single charge.
7. The capital cost of procuring the electric collection vehicle, including itemized costs for the chassis, the body, and the cab.
8. The projected timeline for procuring the electric vehicle, including when the vehicle will be ready for collection service in the Cities.
9. If the Proposer already has a charging station that will be used to charge the electric vehicle describe the location, type, make, model, month and year installed and charging capacity of the station. Describe what other vehicles are using the station.
10. If the Proposer will procure and install a charging station provide the following information:
a. The cost of permitting and installing a charging station and the location where the charging station will be located.
b. The make and model of the proposed charging station. c. The projected timeline for permitting and installing the charging station. d. The number of charging terminals available at the charging station and if the cost of installing the charging station will be defrayed by other electric refuse vehicles in use in other cities.
e. Impact on rates, if any, related to charging station.
11. Grant funding the Proposer plans to pursue for procurement of the electric refuse collection vehicle and/or the charging station (if any).
12. A plan for the use of spare vehicle(s) to service the route(s) in case the electric collection vehicle is non-operational and/or the electric grid goes down.
13. A plan for how to collect containers or complete the services/routes planned for the BEV until the electric vehicle is in service, if any delays in delivery of the electric vehicles prior to July 1, 2025 are anticipated.
This Proposal Form 10 will become Attachment F-3 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
316
77 PROPOSAL FORM 11: PLANS TO INCORPORATE ON-BOARD TECHNOLOGY TO
BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR ON COLLECTION VEHICLES TO INCREASE
SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY AND FOR CONTAMINATION MONITORING
Article 8 of the Agreement includes the minimum on -board technology requirements to increase safety and efficiency. Include the following information about the proposed safety and efficiency programs that are required by Article 8:
1. Include the brand and specifications of the collision avoidance systems the Proposer will install on all collection vehicles.
2. Include the brand and specifications of the on -board CRM system the Proposer will install on all collection vehicles.
3. Further describe method to utilize on -board technology to notify customers and Recycling Coordinator(s) of observed contamination incidents (see Sections 2.6.2 and 3.9 of Attachment B).
This Proposal Form 11 will become Attachment F-4 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
317
78 PROPOSAL FORM 12: NUMBERS AND TYPES OF NEW CONTAINERS TO BE
FURNISHED BY CONTRACTOR
Proposer shall describe the manufacturer, dimensions, and colors of the containers that it will provide to all customers within the Cities on or before July 1, 2025. Fill in the tables below showing the numbers, types, and unit price for all proposed containers. Provide the containers needed for each city (Lake Forest (LF) and Laguna Hills (LH)). The background section of the RFP includes current container inventories. Depending upon the cart manufacturer proposed to be used, cart volumes may vary from tho se shown in the following tables by plus or minus 10%. However, the largest residential cart shall not exceed 95 gallons in size due to space constraints in some residential areas of the Cities.
MSW, Recycling, and Food Scraps/Yard Trimmings Containers for Residential Premises Item MSW Quantity
– LF
Quantity
– LH Unit Price
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
95-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
Item RECYCLING
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
95-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
Item YARD TRIMMINGS/FOOD SCRAPS
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
95-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
Stable Bedding and Manure Containers
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
95-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
Item: 14
318
79 MSW Containers for Commercial and Multi-Family Customers Item Quantity
– LF
Quantity
- LH
Unit Price
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
95-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
1-cubic yard bin
1.5-cubic yard bin
2-cubic yard bin
Split 2-cubic yard bin*
3-cubic yard bin
Split 3-cubic yard bin*
4-cubic yard bin
Split 4-cubic yard bin*
6-cubic yard bin
Split 6 cubic yard bin*
10-cubic yard roll-off
20-cubic yard roll-off
30-cubic yard roll-off
40-cubic yard roll-off
*Report number of split bins only in the MSW table to avoid double counting.
Recycling Containers for Commercial and Multi-Family Customers Item Quantity
– LF
Quantity
- LH
Unit Price
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
95-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
1-cubic yard bin
2-cubic yard bin
3-cubic yard bin
4-cubic yard bin
6-cubic yard bin
10-cubic yard roll-off
20-cubic yard roll-off
30-cubic yard roll-off
40-cubic yard roll-off
Item: 14
319
80 Food Scraps Containers for Commercial and Multi-Family Customers Item Quantity
– LF
Quantity
– LH
Unit Price
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
2-cubic yard bin
Co-Collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Containers for Commercial and Multi- Family Customers
Item Quantity
– LF
Quantity
– LH
Unit Price
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
2-cubic yard bin
Yard Trimmings Containers for Commercial and Multi-Family Customers Item Quantity
– LF
Quantity
– LH
Unit Price
35-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
65-gallon wheeled cart with hinged lid
2-cubic yard bin
Compactors and roll-off boxes
Item Quantity
– LF
Quantity
– LH
Unit Price
2-cubic yard compactors
3-cubic yard compactors
4-cubic yard compactors
6-cubic yard compactors
10-yard compactors
20-yard compactors
30-yard compactors
Other compactors (indicate size)
10-yard roll-off boxes
20-yard roll-off boxes
25-yard roll-off boxes
30-yard roll-off boxes
40-yard roll-off boxes
Other
Refer to Attachment E-1 for minimum wheeled cart specifications.
This Proposal Form 12 will become Attachment E-2 to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
320
81 PROPOSAL FORM 13: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Provide a narrative description of all activities to be completed in order to commence Collection, transportation, processing and Disposal operations on July 1, 2025. Include all areas of service including ordering, painting and licensing of new Collection vehicles, arrangement for fueling of alternative fuel vehicles, rou ting the City, preparation for Customer Billing, deployment of new Carts, Bins, Roll Off boxes and Compactors, preparation of public education materials required in the Agreement, status meetings with the City, key steps in permitting and procuring the Ele ctric Collection Vehicle and associated charging station required by the Agreement, and all other steps that will be taken to prepare for roll out in Lake Forest and Laguna Hills.
Include a chart showing each week of the implementation period, beginning with Summer/Fall 2024 and going through March 31, 2026, and showing all activities that will occur prior to the start of collection operations on July 1, 2025, and key activities that will occur in the first ninety (90) days of operations (troubleshooting, switch out of Carts if Customers change Cart size, responding to questions from Customers, etc.) and thereafter through March 31, 2026.
This Proposal Form 13 will become Attachment C to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
321
82 PROPOSAL FORM 14: DESCRIPTION OF FOOD SCRAP AND/OR YARD
TRIMMINGS AND/OR CO-COLLECTED YARD TRIMMINGS AND FOOD SCRAPS PROCESSING FACILITY (IES) TO BE USED – ANAEROBIC DIGESTION (INCLUDING LETTER DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY AND ABILITY TO RECEIVE
MATERIAL)
Provide the name and address of the Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Food Scrap Processing Facility that is being proposed to process Yard Trimmings, Food Scraps, and Co-collected Yard Trimmings/Food Scraps from the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills. (Refer to the definitions of Yard Trimmings, Food Scraps, and Co -collected Yard Trimmings/Food in Attachment A of the Agreement. Refer to the program descriptions in the Scope of Work in Attachment B of the Agreement.)
Provide the name and contact information for the Manager of the AD Food Scrap Processing Facility that is proposed. Describe the type of processing equipment that is used at the facility and the processing capacity (in tons per hour, tons per working day and tons per year) that has been reserved for the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills).
Food-Soiled Paper: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts Food Soiled Paper and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of Food Soiled Paper and what types of Food Soiled Paper can be accepted. If Food Soiled Paper is accepted at the proposed facility, identify if it will be considered a contaminant or if it will be processed as an acceptable of the feedstock. If Food Soiled Paper is considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or processed in some other way.
Compostable Plastics: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts compostable plastics and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of compostable plastics and what types of compostable plastics can be accepted. If compostable plastics can be a ccepted at the proposed facility, identify if it will be considered a contaminant or if it will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock.
If compostable plastics is considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, a nd whether it will be disposed of or processed in some other way.
Item: 14
322
83 Plastic Bags: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts plastic bags and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of plastic bags and what types of plastic bags can be accepted. If plastic bags can be accepted at the proposed facility , identify if the plastic bags will be considered a contaminant or if plastic bags will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock. If plastic bags are considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or recycled.
Capacity
If the proposed AD Processing Facility is owned by the Proposer's firm, describe the total permitted tons per day and per year allowed by the facility’s permits and the total amount of capacity already committed to other users (provide list of existing use rs and daily and annual tons). Show how there is sufficient additional permitted capacity at the proposed facility to accommodate the tons that will come from Lake Forest and Laguna Hills, including the Proposer’s estimate of the tons that will be processed in each of the above material categories. Confirm that the minimum capacity required to be reserved for the Cities pursuant to Agreement Section 7.01 is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1-year extensions.
Digestate
Include information about how residual Digestate will be processed and how Digestate will be diverted. Include information about specific products to be made from Digestate.
State whether Proposer plans to land apply any Digestate with or without prior additional processing. Provide test results from an independent laboratory of the end products resulting from processing of digestate (e..g. compost made from Digestate). Test results shall be submitted for compost (or other soil amendment(s) or other produc ts) currently being produced by the proposed facility. If Digestate is to be land applied without further processing, submit lab results for the Digestate currently resulting from operations at the proposed AD facility. The following test protocols shall be used for tests of products made from Digestate and for Digestate that is to be directly land applied: Test Methods for the Examination of Composting and compost (TMECC) showing levels of pesticides, herbicides, carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio, organic mat ter content, salinity total nitrogen, total phosphorus, stability, phytotoxicity, pH, maturing, boron, chloride, sodium, particle sizes, heavy metal concentrations, and pathogen concentrations.
Item: 14
323
84 Production of Energy
Include specifics of how state and federal incentives for renewable natural gas and/or electricity generated by the AD Food Scrap Processing Facility will be used to reduce the rates charged to the City’s ratepayers.
Proposers shall provide a flow diagram showing the flow of organic materials into the digestor, the byproducts including liquid and solid digestate and biomethane, how byproducts are handled and processed, how byproducts are marketed, specific markets for solid and liquid Digestate including land application, other proposed uses of Digestate including beneficial reuse and Alternative Daily Cover.
Non-Proposer Owned Facility
If the proposed AD Food Scrap Processing Facility is owned by another company, provide a copy of the contract between the Proposer and the AD Food Scrap Processing Facility owner showing the tons of processing capacity reserved for the Cities of Lake Forest and Laguna Hills - the price to be charged, digestate disposition and handling practices, how government incentives will mitigate gate fees, and the other key terms of the agreement.
The contract must state that the capacity is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8-year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1- year extensions. Provide the cost per ton for transporting Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps to the processing facility from the Cities.
The contract must also state that the City, its agents and representatives shall be granted access to the facility as required by Sections 7.10, 11.04 and Attachment N of the Agreement to observe operations and to observe and participate in characterizatio ns required to be conducted by Contractor pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement.
Item: 14
324
85 Provide the following cost information about the proposed anaerobic digestion facility:
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to transfer station (if using transfer station):
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to AD facility (if direct hauling from route to facility):
Cost per ton to transport materials from transfer station to AD facility (if using transfer station):
Provide the cost per ton for processing of Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps at the AD facility:
Identify final products generated from proposed facility (RNG, compost):
Identify range of revenue streams, per ton or per cubic yard, for final products:
This Proposal Form 14 will become Attachment R to the Contract.
Item: 14
325
86 PROPOSAL FORM 15: DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS RECOVERY PROCESSING FACILITY(IES) – CLEAN MRF (INCLUDING LETTER DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY
AND ABILITY TO RECEIVE MATERIAL)
Provide the name, address, and Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) number of the Clean Materials Recovery Facility(ies) that are proposed to be used to process Single Material Separated Recyclable Materials and Single Stream Recyclable Materials from the Cities of Lake Fo rest and Laguna Hills. (Refer to the definitions of these capitalized terms in Attachment A of the Agreement. Refer to the program descriptions in the Scope of Work, Attachment B.)
Provide the name and contact information for the Manager of the MRF(s) that are proposed. Describe the type of processing equipment that is used at the MRF, the type and number of sort lines that are available, and the processing capacity (in tons per hour, tons per working day and tons per year) that has been reserved for the Cities.
If the proposed MRF(s) is owned by the Proposer, describe the total permitted tons per day and per year allowed by the facility’s permits and the total amount of capacity already committed to other users (provide list of existing users and daily and annual tons). Show how there is sufficient additional permitted capacity at the proposed facility to accommodate the tons that will come from Cities, including the Proposer’s estimate of the tons that will be processed in each of the material categories (Single Material Recyclables and Single Stream Recyclable Materials). Confirm that the minimum capacity required to be reserved for the Cities pursuant to Agreement Section 7.01 is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1 -year extensions. Provide the cost per ton for processing of Recyclable Materials at the facility as well as the cost per ton for transportation to the facility from the Cities.
If the proposed MRF(s) is owned by another company, provide a copy of the contract between the Proposer and the MRF owner showing the tons of processing capacity reserved for the Cities (for each type of materials, as above), the price to be charged, and the other key terms of the contract. The contract must state that the capacity is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8-year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1 -year extensions. Provide the cost per ton for transporting Recyclable Materials to the processing facility from the Cities. The contract must also state that the City, its agents and representatives shall be granted access to Item: 14
326
87 the facility as required by Sections 7.10, 11.04 and Attachment N of the Agreement to observe operations and to observe and participate in characterizations required to be conducted by Contractor pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement.
This Proposal Form 15 will become Attachment O to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
327
88 PROPOSAL FORM 16: DESCRIPTION OF COMPOST PROCESSING FACILITY(IES)
TO BE USED FOR YARD TRIMMINGS AND/OR FOOD SCRAPS AND/OR CO-
COLLECTED YARD TRIMMINGS AND FOOD SCRAPS (INCLUDING LETTER
DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY AND ABILITY TO RECEIVE MATERIAL)
Provide the name, address, and Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) number of the Compost Facility(ies) that is being proposed to process Yard Trimmings, Food Scraps, and Co-Collected Yard Trimmings/Food Scraps from the Cities. If different facilities are to be used for each material (or combination of materials) list all of the facilities proposed and the material(s) that are to be processed at each of the Compost Facilities.
Food-Soiled Paper: Provide information on whether or not the proposed facility accepts Food-Soiled Paper and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of Food- Soiled Paper and what types of Food-Soiled Paper can be accepted. If Food-Soiled Paper is accepted at the proposed facility, identify if it will be considered a contaminant or if it will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock. If Food -Soiled Paper is considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or processed in some other way.
Compostable Plastics: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts compostable plastics and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of compostable plastics and what types of compostable plastics can be accepted. If compostable plastics can be a ccepted at the proposed facility, identify if it will be considered a contaminant or if it will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock.
If compostable plastics is considered a contaminant, address where this material will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or processed in some other way.
Plastic Bags: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts plastic bags and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of plastic bags and what types of plastic bags can be accepted. If plastic bags can be accepted at the proposed facility , identify if the plastic bags will be considered a contaminant or if plastic bags will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock. If plastic bags are considered a contaminant, address where this material will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or recycled.
Item: 14
328
89 Provide the name and contact information for the Manager of the Compost Facility that is proposed. Describe the type of processing equipment that is used at the facility and the processing capacity (in tons per hour, tons per working day and tons per year ) that has been reserved for the Cities.
If the proposed Compost Facility is owned by the Proposer, describe the total permitted tons per day and per year allowed by the facility’s permits and the total amount of capacity already committed to other users (provide list of existing users and daily and annual tons).
Show how there is sufficient additional permitted capacity at the proposed facility to accommodate the tons that will come from the Cities, including the Proposer’s estimate of the tons that will be processed in each of the material categ ories: food scraps, yard trimmings, and/or co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings. Confirm that the minimum capacity required to be reserved for the Cities pursuant to Agreement Section 7.01 is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and contin uing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1-year extensions.
If the proposed Compost Facility is owned by another company, provide a copy of the contract between the Proposer and the Compost Facility owner showing the tons of processing capacity reserved for the Cities, the price to be charged, and the other key terms of the contract. The contract must state that the capacity is reserved for Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1 -year extensions. Provide the cost per ton for transporting Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps to the processing facility from the Cities. The contract must also state that the City, its agents and representatives shall be granted access to the facility as required by Sections 7.10, 11.04 and Attachment N of the Agreement to observe operations and to observe and participate in characterizati ons required to be conducted by Contractor pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement.
End Uses for Processed Materials. Describe the proposed end uses for the compost produce from the materials delivered by the Cities including current end markets for compost from the proposed facility. Describe what custom compost blends the facility is capable of producing and list the cu rrent blends and examples of agricultural uses and specific crops being grown using those blends.
Item: 14
329
90 Provide the following cost information about the proposed composting facility: [Note: if more than one facility is proposed, fill out a chart for each proposed facility.]
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to transfer station (if using transfer station):
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to facility (if direct hauling from route to facility):
Cost per ton to transport materials from transfer station to composting facility (if using transfer station):
Provide the cost per ton for processing of Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps at the facility:
Identify final products generated from proposed facility (mulch, compost, wood chips, etc.):
Identify range of revenue streams, per ton or per cubic yard, for final products:
This Proposal Form 16 will become Attachment P to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
330
91 PROPOSAL FORM 17: DESCRIPTION OF PROCESSING FACILITY(IES) –
BIOENGINEERED FEEDSTOCK (INCLUDE LETTER DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY
AND ABILITY TO RECEIVE MATERIAL)
Provide the name, address, and Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) number of the Bioengineered Feedstock Facility(ies) that are proposed to be used to process Food Scraps. Describe how the Proposer will reduce levels of contamination in the materials to be processed such that the materials are accepted by the Food Scraps Facility(ies).
Provide the name and contact information for the Manager of the Bioengineered Feedstock Food Scraps Facility(ies) that are proposed. Describe the type of processing equipment that is used at the Bioengineered Feedstock Food Scraps Facility(ies ), the level and types(s) of contamination allowed, the type and number of receiving floors that are available, the processing capacity (in tons per hour, tons per working day and tons per year) that has been reserved for the Cities, the process to prepare /pre-process the food scraps before being delivered to the Wastewater Treatment Facility, the process to remove contaminants from the Food Scraps stream, the conversion from solid (tons) to liquid measurements (gallons) after the Food Scraps are pre-processed at the facility, and the average Total Suspended Solids percentage after being processed. Provide the route types (i.e. commercial) for the materials that will be delivered to this facility.
Food-Soiled Paper: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts Food - Soiled Paper and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of Food - Soiled Paper and what types of Food-Soiled Paper can be accepted. If Food-Soiled Paper is accepted at the p roposed facility, identify if it will be considered a contaminant or if it will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock. If Food Soiled Paper is considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or processed in some other way.
Compostable Plastics: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts compostable plastics and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of compostable plastics and what types of compostable plastics can be accepted. If compostable plastics can be a ccepted at the proposed facility, identify if it will be considered a contaminant or if it will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock.
Item: 14
331
92 If compostable plastics is considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or processed in some other way.
Plastic Bags: Provide information on whether or not the facility accepts plastic bags and, if so, what percent of the incoming feedstock can consist of plastic bags and what types of plastic bags can be accepted. If plastic bags can be accepted at the proposed facility , identify if the plastic bags will be considered a contaminant or if plastic bags will be processed as an acceptable part of the feedstock. If plastic bags are considered a contaminant, address where it will be taken, and whether it will be disposed of or recycled.
If the proposed Bioengineered Feedstock Food Scraps Processing Facility is owned by the Proposer, describe the total permitted tons per day and per year allowed by the facility’s permits and the total amount of capacity already committed to other users (provide list of existing users and daily and annual tons). Show how there is sufficient additional permitted capacity at the proposed facility to accommodate the tons that will come from the Cities including the Proposer’s estimate of the tons of Food Scraps that will be processed. Confirm that the minimum capacity required to be reserved for the Cities pursuant to Agreement Section 7.01 is reserved beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8-year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1-year extensions. Provide the cost per ton for processing of Food Scraps at the facility as well as the cost per ton for transportation to the facility from the Cities. The contract must also state that the City, its agents and representatives shall be gra nted access to the facility as required by Sections 7.10, 11.04 and Attachment N of the Agreement to observe operations and to observe and participate in characterizations required to be conducted by Contractor pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement.
Indicate which Wastewater Treatment Plant(s) will ultimately receive the materials, how many gallons of processed Bioengineered Feedstock from the Cities will be delivered to each facility per month, and the final destination(s) of the post -digestion resid uals.
Include all permit information for the Wastewater Treatment Plant that will accept the Bioengineered Feedstock as well permit information for the facility(ies) that will ultimately accept the residual sludge from the Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Item: 14
332
93 Describe how residuals will be processed by the Proposer and if residual will be diverted or landfilled. Residuals include non-acceptable materials removed from the Food Scraps stream at the Bioengineered Feedstock Processing Facility; materials removed fr om the Bioengineered Feedstock stream delivered to the Wastewater Treatment Facility; and materials removed when the residual is delivered to the ultimate residual processing facility. Provide the annual estimated tons of residuals from material processed from the Cities, and the percentage of the projected incoming tons from the Cities that will be residual.
Describe the specific markets into which the residual will be sold, if applicable, or if it will be land applied. Include specifics for how state and federal incentives for renewable natural gas and/or electricity generated by the Bioengineered Feedstock F ood Scraps Processing Facility will be used to reduce the rates charged to the Cities’ ratepayers.
If the proposed Bioengineered Feedstock Food Scraps Processing Facility(ies) is owned by another company, provide a copy of the contract between the Proposer and the Bioengineered Feedstock Food Scraps Processing Facility owner showing the tons of processing capacity reserved for the Cities, the price to be charged, and the other key terms of the contract. The contract must state that the capacity is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreeme nt, plus the potential two 1 -year extensions. Provide the cost per ton for transporting food scraps to the processing facility from the Cities.
Item: 14
333
94 Provide the following cost information about the proposed co-digestion facility:
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to transfer station (if using transfer station):
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to facility (if direct hauling from route to facility):
Cost per ton to transport materials from transfer station to co -digestion facility (if using transfer station):
Provide the cost per ton for processing of Yard Trimmings and/or Food Scraps at the facility:
Cost per ton, or per gallon, to transport the Bioengineered Feedstock from the pre-processing facility to the Wastewater Treatment Plant:
Cost per ton, or per gallon, charged by the wastewater Treatment Plant to accept the Bioengineered Feedstock:
This Proposal Form 17 will become Attachment S to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
334
95 PROPOSAL FORM 18: DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION
DEBRIS PROCESSING FACILITY(IES) TO BE USED (INCLUDING LETTER
DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY AND ABILITY TO RECEIVE MATERIAL)
Provide the name, address, and Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) number, of the Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility(ies) being proposed for processing C&D materials collected in the Cities.
Provide the name and contact information for the Manager of the Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility that is proposed. Describe the type of processing equipment that is used at the facility and the processing capacity (in tons per hour, tons per working day and tons per year) that has been reserved for the Cities.
If the proposed Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility is owned by the Proposer, describe the total permitted tons per day and per year allowed by the facility’s permits and the total amount of capacity already committed to other users (provide list of existing users and daily and annual tons). Show how there is sufficient additional permitted capacity at the proposed facility to accommodate the tons that will come from the Cities, including the Proposer’s estimate of the tons of Constructio n and Demolition Debris that will be collected annually. Describe how the facility can meet the current CALGreen C&D diversion requirement of 65% and the anticipated 75% CALGreen C&D diversion requirement that may be in place by July 1, 2025. Provide a copy of a third party audit and verification of the actual average diversion percentage achieved by the facility for calendar years 2021 and 2022, including the average percent residue.
If the proposed Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility is owned by another company, provide a copy of the contract between the Proposer and the Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility owner showing the tons of processing capacity reserved for the Cities for C&D material, the price to be charged, and other key terms of the contract. The contract must state that the capacity is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1 -year extensions. The contract must also state that the City, its agents and representatives shall be granted access to the facility as required by Sections 7.10, 11.04 and Attachment N of the Agreement to observe operations and Item: 14
335
96 to observe and participate in characterizations required to be conducted by Contractor pursuant to Section 11.07 of the Agreement.
Describe how the facility can meet the current CALGreen C&D diversion requirement of 65% and the anticipated 75% CALGreen C&D diversion requirement that may be in place by July 1, 2025. Provide a copy of a third-party audit and verification of the actual average diversion percentage achieved by the facility for calendar years 2021 and 2022, including the percent residue.
This Proposal Form 18 will become Attachment Q to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
336
97 PROPOSAL FORM 19: PENDING LITIGATION AND ASSESSMENT OF LIQUIDATED
DAMAGES
Pending Litigation:
List all civil and criminal legal actions now pending against the Proposer. Provide: (1) the name of the action, (2) the court in which it is pending, (3) the docket number, (4) the amount at issue, if any, and the claims involved; and (5) a brief statement of the current status of all criminal actions and all civil actions involving amounts greater than five percent (5%) of Proposer’s annual revenue. If Proposer is a national or international company provide the listed information for the division or subsidiary operating in Southern California. Include claims and actions involving amounts greater than five percent (5%) of that division’s or subsidiary’s annual revenue.
If Proposer is a regional company, provide the listed information for operations in California. Include claims and actions involving amounts greater than five percent (5%) for the company’s annual revenue from California operations.
If the Proposer is a corporation, include in your answer all actions that are pending that involve as a party a current corporate officer or a person who served as an officer within the last two years, which arise from the officer's activities on behalf of the corporation.
If Proposer is a subsidiary of a "parent" corporation, include in your answer all actions involving the "parent" corporation.
If Proposer is a "parent" corporation with subsidiary corporations, include in your answer all actions involving those subsidiary corporations including all affiliated corporations (i.e. those under common ownership and control by the same parent or ultima te parent corporation).
If Proposer is a partnership, include in your answer all legal actions involving individual partners, which arise from their activities on behalf of the partnership, not otherwise disclosed in your answer.
If Proposer is a Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), provide the information requested above for each member of the LLC.
If Proposer is a joint venture, provide the information requested above for each member of the joint venture.
Assessment of Liquidated Damages
Provide a list of all local government entities (cities, counties, special districts, JPA’s etc.) that have assessed liquidated damages against the Proposer over the last three (3) years.
Include the number of assessments of each liquidated damage, the cau se or failure for Item: 14
337
98 which the liquidated damages were assessed, and the amount of the liquidated damages.
Describe what actions the Proposer took to remedy the situation that caused the assessment of liquidated damages. Indicate if the assessment of liquidated damages against the Proposer is currently ongoing.
Item: 14
338
99 PROPOSAL FORM 20: EXCEPTIONS TO AGREEMENT
List any of the sections in the Agreement to which the Proposer takes exception. Include the specific language to which Proposer takes exception. Explain the basis for the exception. Propose specific alternative language that is acceptable to Proposer.
Item: 14
339
100
PROPOSAL FORM 21: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Attach the two most recent audited annual financial statements and reports for the Proposer and all subcontractors to this Proposal Form. If a Proposer or subcontractor has been in business for less than 2 years, state this fact and provide financial statements from major shareholders, such as bank and brokerage reports, as available. If Proposer is a joint venture, include audited financial statements for all members of the joint venture.
The Proposer authorizes the City to contact the financial institutions listed below and to use information provided by them to evaluate the financial and business capability and responsibility of the Proposer.
1. Banking Reference
Name of Bank:
Address:
Person to Contact:
Contact Telephone:
2. Surety Reference
Name of Surety:
Address:
Person to Contact:
Contact Telephone:
3. Insurance References
A) General Liability
Name of Insurance Company:
Address:
Person to Contact:
Contact Telephone:
B) Workers’ Compensation
Name of Insurance Company:
Address:
Person to Contact:
Contact Telephone:
Item: 14
340
101
PROPOSAL FORM 22: AB 1669 STATEMENT
SB 1669 (California Labor Code Chapter 4.6, Division 2, Part 3, Section 1070 et seq.) requires public agencies conducting a solid waste collection procurement to give a 10% preference to Proposers who agree to retain, for a specified period, certain employ ees who were employed to perform essentially the same services by the previous contractor.
Such a Proposer is required to offer employment to those employees, except for reasonable and substantiated cause.
Proposers shall review the above-referenced sections of the Labor Code and the text in Section 7.05 I of the Agreement. Indicate on this Proposal Form whether the Proposer is willing to offer employment to employees of the Cities’ current contractor as described in the referenced Labor Code Sections, if Proposer is selected and awarded the Agreement.
If the Proposer is the Cities’ current contractor for the solid waste and recycling collection and processing contract, indicate whether or not the Proposer commits to retaining its current employees, except for reasonable and substantiated cause, as those are described in the referenced Labor Code Sections.
If there is any part of the Labor Code requirements that the Proposer will NOT follow, indicate those on this Proposal Form.
Item: 14
341
102
PROPOSAL FORM 23: KITCHEN FOOD SCRAPS CONTAINER
Provide the specifications for, and a photograph of, the residential kitchen Food Scraps container that will be provided:
Specifications of Container
Volume
Weight
Dimensions
Lid
Dishwasher
Safe
Label
Unit price
Shipping Price
Per Unit
Describe the process(s) by which a residential customer would request a replacement kitchen Food Scraps container (e.g., will it be via a call to the Proposer’s customer service representatives, via e-mail, via completion of an online form, via a verbal request to the Recycling Coordinator), and the process for delivering the container to the customer (e.g.
Recycling Coordinator delivery, collection driver delivery, container delivery route, other).
Provide specifications regarding odor and pest mitigation features and labeling detail for the proposed containers.
This Proposal Form 23 will become Attachment GG to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
342
103
PROPOSAL FORM 24: COMMERCIAL INTERNAL FOOD SCRAPS CONTAINER
Provide the specifications for, and a photograph of, the commercial internal Food Scraps recycling container that will be provided by the Proposer:
Specifications of 23-gal Internal Food Scraps Container Width
Depth
Height
Capacity
Color
Lid Type
Material
Shape
Unit Price
Shipping
Price
Provide the process(s) by which a commercial customer would request an internal Food Scraps container (e.g., via a call to Proposer’s customer service representatives, via e - mail, via completion of an online form, via a verbal request to the Recycling Coordinator), and the process for delivering the container to the customer (e.g., Recycling Coordinator delivery, collection driver delivery, container delivery route, other).
This Proposal Form 24 will become Attachment HH to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
343
104
PROPOSAL FORM 25: BIN SENSORS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR
Provide costs for the implementation of bin sensors in the Cities as described below. In addition to cost, describe the proposed bin sensors that your company will implement for each service described below, including the brand, model, specifications, capa bilities of the sensors, examples of locations where this type of Bin Sensors are currently in use, the per unit monthly licensing cost, per unit installation cost, and other pertinent information..
Pilot Program: A rate for individual commercial or multi -family generators that sign up for this service. This rate must include the installation of the bin sensor, the up-front cost of the sensor (if applicable), and the recurring monthly subscription fee of the bin se nsor (if applicable), and all customer contact, training, customer education materials, and all other requirements of Section 8.04.G.1 of the Agreement. The customer will request this service from the Contractor and arrange for installation of the equipment as described in Section 8.04.G of the Agreement. The Contractor will work directly with the technology vendor and the customer to set up the technology and allow the customer and the Contractor to view the online portal showing bin fullness and other key metrics. This option will serve as a pilot program and the Contractor will be required to have at least 25 bin sensors available for installation at all times.
Optional City-Wide Program: This is an Optional City -Directed Program. If and when directed by the Cities, Contractor will provide bin sensors for all commercial and multi - family bins, as described in Section 8.04.G.1 of the Agreement. This rate must include the installation of the bin sensor, the up -front cost of the sensor (if applicable), and the recurring monthly subscription fee of the bin sensor ( if applicable), and all customer contact, training, customer education materials, and all other requiremen ts of Section
8.04.G.1.
This Proposal Form 25 will become Attachment V to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
344
105
PROPOSAL FORM 26: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROCESSING
FACILITY(IES) TO BE USED FOR STABLE BEDDING/MANURE (INCLUDING
LETTER DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY AND ABILITY TO RECEIVE MATERIAL)
Provide the name, address, and Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) number of the Facility(ies) that is being proposed to process Stable Bedding/Manure from the Cities. If different facilities are to be used for each material, or combination of materials, list all of the facilities proposed and t he material(s) that are to be processed at each of the Facilities.
Provide the name and contact information for the Manager of the Facility that is proposed for processing Stable Bedding/Manure materials. Describe the type of processing equipment that is used at the facility and the processing capacity (in tons per hour, tons per working day and tons per year) that has been reserved for the Cities.
If the proposed Facility is owned by the Proposer, describe the total permitted tons per day and per year allowed by the facility’s permits and the total amount of capacity already committed to other users (provide list of existing users and daily and annual tons). Show how there is sufficient additional permitted capacity at the proposed facility to accommodate the tons that will come from the Cities. Confirm that the minimum capacity required to be reserved for the Cities pursuant to Agreement Section 7.01 is reserved for the Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8 -year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1-year extensions.
If the proposed Facility is owned by another company, provide a copy of the contract between the Proposer and the Facility owner showing the tons of processing capacity reserved for the Cities, the price to be charged, and the other key terms of the contra ct.
The contract must state that the capacity is reserved for Cities beginning July 1, 2025 and continuing through the entire 8-year term of the Agreement, plus the potential two 1-year extensions. The contract must also state that the City, its agents and representatives shall be granted access to the facility as required by Sections 7.10, 11.04 and Attachment N of the Agreement to observe operations and to observe and participate in characterizations required to be conducted by Contractor pursuant to Sec tion 11.07 of the Agreement.
Item: 14
345
106
Provide the following cost information about the proposed Stable Bedding/Manure processing facility:
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to transfer station (if using transfer station):
Cost per ton to transport materials from last stop on route to facility (if direct hauling from route to facility):
Cost per ton to transport materials from transfer station to facility (if using transfer station):
Provide the cost per ton for processing of Stable Bedding/Manure at the facility:
Identify final products generated from proposed facility (vermicompost, RNG, compost, etc.):
Identify range of revenue streams, per ton or per cubic yard, for final products:
This Proposal Form 26 will become Attachment BB to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
346
107
PROPOSAL FORM 27: EFFICIENCIES GAINED FROM CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL
COLLECTION ROUTES
Efficiencies will be gained through cross -jurisdictional routing for commercial and residential services, including special services such as bulky item collection, e -waste collection, HHW, white goods, etc. The Cities’ consultant estimates that these cross - jurisdictional routing efficiencies can reduce costs by $1.5 - $3.0 million per year through the need for fewer collection vehicles, the elimination of routes due to combined collection efficiencies, less fuel usage due to eliminated routes, and other factors. Respond to the questions below quantifying how cross -jurisdictional collection route efficiencies will reduce the cost of providing collection service and how these cost savings will be passed along to ratepayers. Proposers can use the weekly lift counts for residential and commercial service lines included in Section 2 of the RFP to identify combined routing efficiencies.
Residential Collection Efficiencies
1. Does the Proposer propose to eliminate any current residential curbside collection routes or partial routes (i.e., MSW, recycling, or co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings) as a result of cross-jurisdictional collection efficiencies?
2. If yes, describe specifics of which routes, or partial routes, will be consolidated, the composite number of routes (full or partial) that will be consolidated, the reduction in vehicles needed, and if fewer drivers would be needed.
3. If yes, what are the cost savings, including capital cost savings over the term of the contract, capital financing cost savings over the term of the contract, anticipated labor cost reductions, anticipated fuel cost reductions, and other cost savings?
4. If no, describe why there are no residential cross-jurisdictional routing efficiencies.
5. How will the residential cost reductions reduce rates? Provide specific aggregate cost reductions for residential route consolidations and how these cost-savings will be used to reduce residential rates.
6. Does the Proposer propose to consolidate or optimize special service routes (i.e., HHW, bulky items, e -waste, u -waste, etc.) based on cross -jurisdictional routing efficiencies?
7. If yes, describe specifics of which routes, or partial routes, will be consolidated, the composite number of routes (full or partial) that will be consolidated, the reduction in vehicles needed, and if fewer drivers would be needed.
8. If yes, what are the cost savings, including capital cost savings over the term of the contract, capital financing cost savings over the term of the contract, anticipated labor cost reductions, anticipated fuel cost reductions, and other cost savings?
Item: 14
347
108
9. If no, describe why there are no cross-jurisdictional routing efficiencies for special collection services.
Commercial and Multi-family Collection Efficiencies
10. Does the Proposer propose to eliminate any current commercial collection routes (i.e., commercial MSW, commercial recycling, or commercial food scraps, commercial yard trimmings, commercial co -collected food scraps and yard trimmings, etc.) or partial rout es as a result of cross -jurisdictional collection efficiencies?
11. If yes, describe specifics of which routes, or partial routes, will be consolidated, the composite number of routes (full or partial) that will be consolidated, the reduction in vehicles needed, and if fewer drivers would be needed.
12. If yes, what are the cost savings, including capital cost savings over the term of the contract, capital financing cost savings over the term of the contract, anticipated labor cost reductions, anticipated fuel cost reductions, and other cost savings?
13. If no, describe why there are no commercial cross -jurisdictional routing efficiencies.
14. How will the commercial cost reductions reduce rates? Provide specific aggregate cost reductions for commercial route consolidations and how these cost -savings will be used to reduce commercial rates.
15. Does the Proposer propose to consolidate or optimize commercial special service routes (i.e., HHW, bulky items, e -waste, u -waste, etc.) based on the cross - jurisdictional routing efficiencies?
16. If yes, describe specifics of which routes, or partial routes, will be consolidated, the composite number of routes (full or partial) that will be consolidated, the reduction in vehicles needed, and if fewer drivers would be needed.
17. If yes, what are the cost savings, including capital cost savings over the term of the contract, capital financing cost savings over the term of the contract, anticipated labor cost reductions, anticipated fuel cost reductions, and other cost savings?
18. If no, describe why there are no cross -jurisdictional routing efficiencies for commercial special services.
19. How many front-end loaders will be equipped with cart grippers on the collection fork to allow for the collection of both Commercial/Multi -family Bins and Carts on the same collection route?
Item: 14
348
109
Staffing Efficiencies
20. Does the Proposer anticipate any reduction in administrative staffing as a result of the cross -jurisdictional approach? If so, please describe which specific staff functions can be consolidated or reduced and the expected cost savings resulting from these reductions.
21. Please note: Proposer shall factor these cross -jurisdictional routing efficiencies into the rates in Proposal Form 29a, where indicated. Proposer shall also provide rates assuming there are no cross -jurisdictional collection efficiencies for the City of Lake Forest in Proposal Form 29b and provide rates assuming there are no cross-jurisdictional collection efficiencies for the City of Laguna Hills in Proposal Form 29c. The rates included in Proposal Forms 29b and 29c will be used in the unlikely case the t wo cities decide to discontinue the cross -jurisdictional routing and the two cities no longer share collection routes.
This Proposal Form 27 will become Attachment X to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
349
110
PROPOSAL FORM 28: PROPOSED CUSTOMER SERVICE SYSTEM
Article 9 of the Agreement describes the customer service and responsiveness requirements. Complete this Proposal Form with metrics regarding how Proposer, if selected, will provide exemplary levels of customer service to the residents and businesses in the Cities.
Number of Call Centers Operated by
Proposer
Location(s) of Call Center(s) that Will be
Used to Field Customer Calls in Lake
Forest and Laguna Hills
Number of Cities the Proposed Call
Center Currently Services
Aggregate Residential Population of All of
the Cities Serviced by the Proposed Call
Center
FTE – LF FTE – LH Total FTE
Total Number of Customer Service
Representatives at each Call Center and
Number of Customer Service
Representatives Allocated to the Cities (in
FTE)
Total Number of Customer Service
Managers at each Call Center and
Number of Managers Allocated to the
Cities (in FTE)
Total Number of Customer Service
Supervisors at each Call Center and
Number of Supervisors Allocated to the
Cities (in FTE)
Describe the proposed telephone system, its specific capabilities, and confirm its ability to meet all the requirements in Article 9 of the Agreement. Include the name of the software used for the Proposer’s customer service system.
Describe how online forms, callbacks, and other technological innovations will be implemented to enhance the customer service experience.
Include an example of a monthly report showing the key data metrics required in Article 9, including average hold time for the month, number of non -connected calls, number of dropped calls, number of callbacks, and other metrics.
Confirm that each City will have its’ own local telephone number in the (949) area code for customers from the City to call, as required by Agreement Section 9.04.C.3.
This Proposal Form 28 will become Attachment OO to the final Agreement.
Item: 14
350
111
PROPOSAL FORM 29: PROPOSED MAXIMUM RATES TO BE CHARGED
Complete the Excel rate forms included as Proposal Form 29.
Proposer shall complete 3 separate rate schedules for all rates as part of Proposal Form 29 assuming three scenarios:
Form 29a. Proposed rates to be charged for both Cities assuming cross-jurisdictional efficiencies between the Lake Forest and Laguna Hills This rate schedule will become Attachment D-1 to the Agreement.
Form 29b. Proposed rates to be charged in Lake Forest assuming no cross - jurisdictional efficiencies. This rate schedule will become Attachment D -2 to the Agreement.
Form 29c. Proposed rates to be charged in Laguna Hills assuming no cross - jurisdictional efficiencies. This rate schedule will become Attachment D -3 to the Agreement.
Proposals that do not contain complete rates on all three rate schedules will be deemed incomplete and will not be considered responsive.
Item: 14
351
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Table 1: Residential Assumptions
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
$ per hour
hours
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
percent
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
per ton
Table 2: Commercial and Multi-family Assumptions
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
lbs. per cubic yard
hours
hours
$ per hour
Enter cost assumptions into yellow-shaded area below
Density of Commercial MSW
Density of Commercial Recyclable Materials
Density of Commercial Yard Trimmings
Density of Commercial Food Scraps
Density of Residential Curbside MSW
Density of Residential Curbside Recyclable Materials
Density of Residential Curbside Co-collected Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps Fully Burdened Cost per Hour to Operate Residential Side Loader Time to service 1 residential cart (includes time on and off route) Transfer costs, per ton of residential organics, for transferring materials to Orange County Waste and Recycling (OCW&R) Bee Canyon Greenery (11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine, Ca) composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Additional cost (or cost reduction) per ton of residential organics, for direct-hauling materials from collection routes directly to OCW&R composting facility Bee Canyon Greenery composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Transfer costs, per ton of residential organics, for transferring materials to OCW&R Capistrano Greenery (32250 Avenida la Pata, SJC, Ca) composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement
Residue percentage of residential single-stream recyclables Gate fee per ton for residential organics taken to a composting facility Density of Commercial Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Density of Multi-family MSW
Transfer costs, per ton of residential organics, for transferring materials to proposed composting facility (leave blank if proposer is planning on direct-hauling from collection route to composting facility)
Revenue per ton for finished compost
Gate fee per ton for residential organics taken to an anaerobic digestion (AD) facility.
Transfer costs, per ton of residential organics, for transferring materials to proposed AD facility (leave blank if proposer is planning on direct-hauling from collection route to AD facility)
Revenue, including LCFS and RIN credits and revenue from sale of composted digestate, per ton for AD Additional cost (or cost reduction) per ton of residential organics, for direct-hauling materials from collection routes directly to OCW&R Capistrano Greenery composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Transfer costs, per ton of residential organics, for transferring materials to OCW&R Valencia Greenery (1942 N. Valencia Ave, Brea) composting facility should this facility accept co- collected organics during the term of the agreement
Additional cost (or cost reduction) per ton of residential organics, for direct-hauling materials from collection routes directly to OCW&R Valencia Greenery composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Time to service commercial/multi-family BIN (includes time on and off route) Density of Multi-family Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Time to service commercial/multi-family CART (includes time on and off route) Density of Multi-family Recyclable Materials
Density of Multi-family Yard Trimmings
Density of Multi-family Food Scraps
Attachment D.1 - Maximum Rates to be Charged Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills Proposer Cost Assumptions
Instructions: Fill in the cost and productivity assumptions used to develop proposed rates as listed in Tables 1 - 4 below. Failure to provide the requested assumption data will be counted against proposers in the RFP evaluation. Cells shaded in yellow require proposer input.
Fully Burdened Cost per Hour to Operate Commercial Cart Collection Vehicle (CNG Vehicle) - Enter cost assumptions into yellow shaded area below
Cost per ton for disposal
Cost per ton for processing single-stream recyclables
Composite revenue per ton for sale of single-stream recyclable materials DRAFT
Item: 14
352
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged $ per hour
$ per hour
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
$ per ton
Table 3. Cost Assumptions for Providing Core Special Services - Residential Number of
Households in
Lake Forest
Number of
Households in
Laguna Hills
Total Number
of
Households
in Service
Area (Laguna
Hills and Lake
Forest)
Projected Monthly
Household
Participation
Percentage
Expected
Number of
Monthly
Participating
Households
Monthly Cost
of Providing
Service at
Projected
Participation
Levels
Curbside collection of bulky items (includes white goods) Mail-back collection of sharps for all SFH and MFH
Curbside collection of e-waste/u-waste (2 per household per year) Curbside collection of HHW (2 per household per year)
19,563 8,201 27,764
Cost per ton to transfer single-stream recyclables
Cost per ton to transfer source-separated food scraps
Cost per ton to transfer MSW
Transfer costs, per ton of commercial organics, for transferring materials to OCW&R Valencia Greenery (1942 N. Valencia Ave, Brea) composting facility should this facility accept co- collected organics during the term of the agreement
Additional cost (or cost reduction) per ton of commercial organics, for direct-hauling materials from collection routes directly to OCW&R Valencia Greenery composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Transfer cost per ton of commercial organics taken to proposer's co-digestion facility (if the proposer is proposing to transship commercial organics to a co-digestion facility) Cost per ton of transporting commercial organics to proposer's co-digestion facility if it is direct-hauled to the facility off the collection route Gate fee per ton for anaerobic digestion (exclude transportation).
Transfer cost per ton of commercial organics taken to proposer's anaerobic digestion facility (if the proposer is proposing to transship commercial organics to an AD facility) Cost per ton of transporting commercial organics to proposer's anaerobic digestion facility if it is direct-hauled to the facility off the collection route Revenue, including LCFS and RIN credits and revenue from sale of composted digestate, per ton for co-digestion Transfer costs, per ton of commercial organics, for transferring materials to Orange County Waste and Recycling (OCW&R) Bee Canyon Greenery (11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine, Ca) composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Additional cost (or cost reduction) per ton of commercial organics, for direct-hauling materials from collection routes directly to OCW&R composting facility Bee Canyon Greenery composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Transfer costs, per ton of commercial organics, for transferring materials to OCW&R Capistrano Greenery (32250 Avenida la Pata, SJC, Ca) composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Additional cost (or cost reduction) per ton of commercial organics, for direct-hauling materials from collection routes directly to OCW&R Capistrano Greenery composting facility should this facility accept co-collected organics during the term of the agreement Revenue, including LCFS and RIN credits and revenue from sale of composted digestate, per ton for AD Transfer cost per ton of commercial organics taken to proposers' composting facility (if the proposer is proposing to transship commercial organics to a composting facility) Cost per ton of transporting commercial organics to proposer's composting facility if it is direct-hauled to the facility off the collection route Revenue per ton for finished compost
Gate fee per ton for co-digestion (exclude transportation) Fully Burdened Cost per Hour to Operate CNG Commercial Front Loader Fully Burdened Cost per Hour to Operate BEV Commercial Front Loader Cost per ton for Residue disposal
Cost per ton for processing commercial/multi-family single-stream recyclables Composite revenue per ton for sale of mixed commercial recyclable materials Residue percentage of commercial mixed recyclables
Gate fee per ton for composting (exclude transportation) DRAFT
Item: 14
353
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Number of
Households in
Lake Forest
Number of
Households in
Laguna Hills
Total Number
of
Households
in Service
Area (Laguna
Hills and Lake
Forest)
Projected Annual
Household
Participation
Percentage
Annual HHW Collection Event 19,653 8,201 27,764 Table 4: Assumed Weights for Temporary Bins, Roll-offs, and Compactors (used for rate items 7 - 17) Container Size Single Stream
Recyclables
MSW to
Landfill
Source-
separated
Food Scraps
Source-separated
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected
Food Scraps
and Yard
Trimmings
Mixed C&D
Temporary - 2 Cubic Yard Bin
Temporary - 3 Cubic Yard Bin
Temporary - 4 Cubic Yard Bin
Temporary - 6 Cubic Yard Bin
Temporary/Permanent - 10 Cubic Yard Roll-off
Temporary/Permanent - 20 Cubic Yard Roll-off
Temporary/Permanent - 25 Cubic Yard Roll-off
Temporary/Permanent - 30 Cubic Yard Roll-off
Temporary/Permanent - 40 Cubic Yard Roll-off
Permanent - 3 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 4 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 6 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 10 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 20 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 25 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 30 Cubic Yard Compactor
Permanent - 40 Cubic Yard Compactor
Annual Cost of Providing
Annual HHW Collection Event
at Projected Participation
Levels
DRAFT
Item: 14
354
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Rates must be submitted in 2025 dollars.
This form will become part of Attachment D.1 to the final Agreement.
1. Residential Basic Level of Service (weekly collection service unless otherwise stated) Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection Composting
1a Residential Curbside
Organics
Co-collected Food scraps and
Yard Trimmings Processed at a
Composting Facility
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon -$ -$ -$ -$ 1a Residential Curbside
Organics
Each additional Co-collected
Food Scraps and Yard
Trimmings - Compost
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection Anaerobic Digestion
1b Residential Curbside
Organics
Co-collected Food scraps and
Yard Trimmings Processed at
an Anaerobic Digestion Facility
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon -$ -$ -$ -$ 1b Residential Curbside
Organics
Each additional Co-collected
Food Scraps and Yard
Trimmings - Anaerobic Digestion
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection Clean MRF
1c Residential Curbside
Recycling
Single-stream recycling cart (up
to 2 per household)
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon -$ -$ -$ -$ 1c Residential Curbside
Recycling
A third, and additional, single-
stream recycling cart
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ Labor Fuel Collection
1d Residential Curbside
MSW
MSW Cart to Landfill - Part of
Residential Bundle 30-35 gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ 1d Residential Curbside
MSW
MSW Cart to Landfill - Part of
Residential Bundle 60-70 gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ 1d Residential Curbside
MSW
MSW Cart to Landfill - Part of
Residential Bundle 90-95 gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ 1d Residential Curbside
MSW
Each additional MSW cart to
Landfill 30-35 gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ 1d Residential Curbside
MSW
Each additional MSW cart to
Landfill 60-70 gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ 1d Residential Curbside
MSW
Each additional MSW cart to
Landfill 90-95 gallon cart -$ -$ -$ -$ # Sector Description
1e
Residential 3-cart
bundle
30-35 gal MSW, organics to
composting facility
2e
Residential 3-cart
bundle
60-70-gal MSW, organics to
composting facility
3e
Residential 3-cart
bundle
90-95-gal MSW, organics to
composting facility
1f
Residential 3-cart
bundle
30-35 gal MSW, organics to AD
facility
2f
Residential 3-cart
bundle
60-70-gal MSW, organics to AD
facility
3f
Residential 3-cart
bundle
90-95-gal MSW, organics to AD
facility
Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Stable Bedding
Processing Facility
Selected in Proposal
Form 26
1g Residential stable
bedding cart service
Curbside residential cart service
for stable bedding generated by
equestrian households in
residential areas. Stable
bedding may be co-collected
with Yard Trimmings and Food
Scraps.
30-35, 60-70, or 90-96
gallon -$ $ - $ - $ - 1g Residential stable
bedding bin service
Bin service for stable bedding
generated by equestrian
households in residential areas
3-yard bin $ - -$ -$ -$ 1h Backyard composting
rate reduction
Rate reduction for City-verified
backyard composting of yard
trimmings
1h Backyard composting
rate reduction
Rate reduction for City-verified
backyard composting of food
scraps
Residential Option 1f - 30-35 gal MSW Cart: One (1) 30-35 gal MSW; one (1) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings of any size to AD facility; and up to two (2) recycling cart of any size (automatically calculated).
Residential Option 2f - 60-70-gal MSW Cart: One (1) 60-70 gal MSW; one (1) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings of any size to AD facility; and up to two (2) recycling carts of any size (automatically calculated).
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Summary of Service Configuration
Residential Option 1e - 30-35 gal MSW Cart: One (1) 30-35 gal MSW; one (1) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings of any size to composting facility; and up to two (2) recycling cart of any size (automatically calculated).
Residential Option 2e - 60-70-gal MSW Cart: One (1) 60-70 gal MSW; one (1) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings of any size to composting facility; and up to two (2) recycling carts of any size (automatically calculated).
Residential Option 3e - 90-95-gal MSW Cart: One (1) 90-95-gal MSW; one (1) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings of any size to composting facility; and up to two (2) recycling carts of any size (automatically calculated).
-$
Monthly reduction in total rate if customer opts out of yard trimmings collection due to a City-verified backyard composting and/or community composting program but still uses cart for food scrap recycling (proposer needs to calculate rate reduction and enter into cell K42) Monthly reduction in total rate if customer opts out of food scrap collection due to a City-verified backyard composting and/or community composting program but still uses cart for yard trimmings recycling (proposer needs to calculate rate reduction and enter into cell K43) # Sector/Stream Description Size
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Total Lake Forest Rate Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Regulatory Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Residential Option 3f - 90-95-gal MSW Cart: One (1) 90-95-gal MSW; one (1) co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings of any size to AD facility; and up to two (2) recycling carts of any size (automatically calculated).
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component
-$
Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
-$
-$ -$ -$ -$ Total Lake Forest Residential 3-cart Rate
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Laguna Hills Residential 3-cart Rate
Total Lake Forest Rate # Sector/Stream Description Size Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Non-escalating Capital Component Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Regulatory Compliance Cost Disposal Component
Lake Forest
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate # Sector/Stream Description Size Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital Component Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Regulatory Compliance Cost
Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Non-escalating Capital
Component # Sector/Stream Description Size
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Disposal Component Total Lake Forest Rate
Fill in the rates proposed as the maximum rates to customers below for each level of service assuming cross-jurisdictional routing efficiencies between the two cities (Laguna Hills and Lake Forest). Rates must be broken down to show the collection cost, processing cost, disposal cost and capital costs (the capital component will not be escalated using the methodologies described in Attachment J). The procedure for adjusting costs throughout the term of the contract appears in Article 14 of the Agreement. A sample calculation is shown in Attachment J. The disposal portion will only be adjusted as that cost actually changes. Disposal costs are a pass through cost and cannot include any mark up, overhead or administrative costs.
Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Regulatory Compliance Cost Total Lake Forest Rate Laguna Hills Procurement Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Attachment D.1 - Maximum Rates to be Charged Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills Sector/Stream
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Size Description #
Disposal Component Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Regulatory Compliance Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate Non-escalating Capital
Component
Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
DRAFT
Item: 14
355
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Rates must be submitted in 2025 dollars.
This form will become part of Attachment D.1 to the final Agreement.
2. Commercial and Multi-Family Single-Material and Single-Stream Recyclables Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection Clean MRF
2a Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 35-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2a Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
35-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2a Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 35-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2a Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 35-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2a Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 35-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2a Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 35-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2b Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 65-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2b Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
65-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2b Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 65-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2b Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 65-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2b Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 65-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2b Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 65-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2c Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 95-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2c Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
95-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2c Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 95-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2c Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 95-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2c Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 95-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2c Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 95-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2d Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2d Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2d Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2d Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2d Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2d Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2e Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2e Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2e Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2e Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2e Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2e Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2f Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2f Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2f Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2f Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2f Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2f Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2g Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 3 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2g Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 3 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2g Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 3 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2g Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 3 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2g Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 3 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Indicate the selected commercial and multi-family source-separated food scrap processing technology using the drop down:
Indicate the selected commercial and multi-family source-separated yard trimmings processing technology using the drop down:
Select a Processing Technology for Source Seperated Commercial and Multi-family Yard Trimmings
Indicate the selected commercial and multi-family co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings processing technology using the drop down:
Select a Processing Technology for Co-collected Commercial and Multi- family Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings
Select a Processing Technology for Source Seperated Commercial and Multi-family Food Scraps
Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
<-- the selected processing methodology will be shown in the Processing Component cell for the corresponding rate item in Section 3 below. Proposers shall provide further details re: their proposed processing facility for this service line in the corresponding proposal form.
<-- the selected processing methodology will be shown in the Processing Component cell for the corresponding rate item in Section 4 below. Proposers shall provide further details re: their proposed processing facility for this service line in the corresponding proposal form.
<-- the selected processing methodology will be shown in the Processing Component cell for the corresponding rate item in Section 5 below. Proposers shall provide further details re: their proposed processing facility for this service line in the corresponding proposal form.
Attachment D.1 - Maximum Rates to be Charged Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills Fill in the rates proposed as the maximum rates to customers below for each level of service assuming cross-jurisdictional routing efficiencies between the two cities (Laguna Hills and Lake Forest). Rates must be broken down to show the collection cost, processing cost, disposal cost and capital costs (the capital component will not be escalated). The procedure for adjusting costs throughout the term of the contract appears in Article 14 of the Agreement. A sample calculation is shown in Attachment J. The disposal portion will only be adjusted as that cost actually changes. Disposal costs are a pass through cost and cannot include any mark up, overhead or administrative costs. As the amount of material being collected and handled is increasingly shifting into diversion, providing diversion services at no charge is no longer feasible and therefore is not permitted in this form. Best practices have identified that a Divertible materials collection rate that is 50% of the MSW rate obtains optimal generator participation. As noted in Section 6. MSW Rate Sheet commercial MSW rates may include any costs that are not recovered by offering Divertible Materials collection programs at 50% the rate for MSW. The rate proposed for collection of commercial, multi-family, temporary bin, temporary roll off, permanent roll off and compactor customers for divertible materials must be 50% lower than the rate proposed for collection of MSW materials. # Sector/Stream Description Size
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital Component Total Base Rate Frequency of
Collection
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
356
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged 2g Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 3 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2h Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 4 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2h Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
4 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2h Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 4 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2h Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 4 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2h Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 4 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2h Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 4 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2i Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 6 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2i Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service
6 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2i Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 6 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2i Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 6 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2i Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 6 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 2i Commercial and Multi-family
Recyclables
Single-stream and Single-
stream Recyclables Service 6 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$
3. Commercial and Multi-Family Source-separated Food Scraps Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Source
Seperated Commercial
and Multi-family Food
Scraps
3a Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 35-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3a Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 35-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3a Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 35-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3a Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 35-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3a Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 35-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3a Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 35-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3b Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 65-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3b Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 65-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3b Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 65-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3b Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 65-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3b Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 65-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3b Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 65-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3c Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3c Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3c Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3c Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3c Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3c Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3d Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3d Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3d Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3d Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3d Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3d Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3e Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 2 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3e Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 2 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3e Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 2 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3e Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 2 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3e Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 2 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 3e Commercial and Multi-family
Food Scraps Source-separated Food Scraps 2 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$
4. Commercial and Multi-Family Source-separated Yard Trimmings Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Source
Seperated Commercial
and Multi-family Yard
Trimmings
4a Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4a Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4a Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4a Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4a Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4a Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4b Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4b Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4b Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4b Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4b Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Note: Food scraps will only be collected in 35-gal, 65-gal, 1-yard, 1.5 yard, and 2-yard containers. Food scraps will not be collected as part of split bin service. # Sector/Stream Description Size
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component
Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
Note: Yard Trimmings will only be collected in 35-gal, 65-gal, 1-yard, 1.5 yard, and 2-yard containers. Food scraps will not be collected as part of split bin service. # Sector/Stream Description Size
Frequency of
Collection
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Disposal Component
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Disposal Component Frequency of
Collection
DRAFT
Item: 14
357
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged 4b Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4c Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4c Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4c Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4c Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4c Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4c Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4d Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4d Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4d Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4d Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4d Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4d Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4e Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4e Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4e Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4e Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4e Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4e Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4f Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 3 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4f Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 3 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4f Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 3 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4f Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 3 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4f Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 3 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4f Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 3 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4g Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 4 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4g Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 4 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4g Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 4 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4g Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 4 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4g Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 4 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 4g Commercial and Multi-family
Yard Trimmings
Source-separated Yard
Trimmings 4 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$
5. Commercial and Multi-Family Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings and Stable Bedding and Manure Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Co-
collected Commercial
and Multi-family Food
Scraps and Yard
Trimmings
5a
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5a
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5a
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5a
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5a
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5a
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 35-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5b
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5b
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5b
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5b
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5b
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5b
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 65-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5c
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5c
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5c
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5c
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5c
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5c
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
Note: Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings will only be collected in 35-gal, 65-gal, 1-yard, 1.5 yard, and 2-yard containers. Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings will not be collected as part of split bin service. # Sector/Stream Description Size
Frequency of
Collection
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
358
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged 5d
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5d
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5d
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5d
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5d
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5d
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 1.5 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5e
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5e
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5e
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5e
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5e
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 5e
Commercial and Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Co-collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings 2 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ DRAFT
Item: 14
359
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Rates must be submitted in 2025 dollars.
This form will become part of Attachment D.1 to the final Agreement.
6. Commercial and Multi-Family MSW Route Service - MSW Hauled directly to the landfill Labor Fuel Collection
6a Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 35-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6a Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 35-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6a Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 35-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6a Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 35-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6a Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 35-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6a Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 35-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6b Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 65-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6b Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
65-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6b Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 65-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6b Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 65-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6b Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 65-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6b Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 65-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6c Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 95-gallon Cart 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6c Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
95-gallon Cart 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6c Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 95-gallon Cart 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6c Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 95-gallon Cart 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6c Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 95-gallon Cart 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6c Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 95-gallon Cart 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6d Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6d Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6d Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6d Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6d Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6d Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 2-
yard split bin)
6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6e Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6e Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6e Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6e Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6e Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6e Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
1.5 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 3-
yard split bin)
6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6f Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6f Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6f Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6f Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6f Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6f Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
2 Cubic Yard Bin
(standalone or half of 4-
yard split bin)
6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6g Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 3 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6g Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill
3 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6g Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 3 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6g Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 3 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6g Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 3 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6g Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 3 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6h Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 4 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ Attachment D.1 - Maximum Rates to be Charged Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills Fill in the rates proposed as the maximum rates to customers below for each level of service assuming cross-jurisdictional routing efficiencies between the two cities (Laguna Hills and Lake Forest) and assuming that all Commercial and Multi-family Divertible Materials (i.e. Single-stream Recyclables, Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings) will be provided at a collection rate that is half the cost of equivalent MSW service. MSW rates may include any costs that are not recovered by offering Divertible Materials collection programs at the 50% reduced rate as requested by the City. Rates must be broken down to show the collection cost, disposal cost and capital costs (the capital component will not be escalated). The procedure for adjusting costs throughout the term of the contract appears in Article 14 of the Agreement. A sample calculation is shown in Attachment J. The disposal portion will only be adjusted as that cost actually changes. Disposal costs are a pass through cost and cannot include any mark up, overhead or administrative costs. As the amount of material being collected and handled is increasingly shifting into diversion, providing diversion services at no charge is no longer feasible and therefore is not permitted in this form. Best practices have identified that a Divertible materials collection rate that is 50% of the MSW rate obtains optimal generator participation. As noted in Section 6. MSW Rate Sheet commercial MSW rates may include any costs that are not recovered by offering Divertible Materials collection programs at 50% the rate for MSW. The rate proposed for collection of commercial, multi-family, temporary bin, temporary roll off, permanent roll off and compactor customers for divertible materials must be 50% lower than the rate proposed for collection of MSW materials. # Sector/Stream Description Size
Frequency of
Collection
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital Component Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
360
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged 6h Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 4 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6h Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 4 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6h Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 4 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6h Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 4 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6h Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 4 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6i Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 6 Cubic Yard Bin 1 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6i Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 6 Cubic Yard Bin 2 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6i Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 6 Cubic Yard Bin 3 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6i Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 6 Cubic Yard Bin 4 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6i Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 6 Cubic Yard Bin 5 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ 6i Commercial and Multi-family
MSW to Landfill
MSW Hauled to Directly to the
Landfill 6 Cubic Yard Bin 6 pick-up per week -$ -$ -$ -$ DRAFT
Item: 14
361
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Rates must be submitted in 2025 dollars.
This form will become part of Attachment D.1 to the final Agreement.
Note: In completing the rates for Sections 7-11, Proposers shall use the assumed weights for roll-off boxes and compactors listed in Table 4 of the 'Assumptions' tab.
7. Permanent Compactor and Roll-Off Box Single-Material Recycling Service or Single-stream Recycling Service Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection Clean MRF
7a
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 3-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7b
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 4-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7c
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 6-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7d
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor/ 10-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7e
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 20-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7f
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 25-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7g
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 30-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7h
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Compactor 40-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7i
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Roll-off Box 10-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7j
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Roll-off Box 20-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7k
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Roll-off Box 25-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7l
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Roll-off Box 30-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 7m
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Permanent Roll-off Box 40-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$
8. Permanent Compactor and Roll-Off Box - Source Separated Food Scraps Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Source
Seperated Food Scraps
Collected in Permanent and
Temporary Roll-offs and
Compactors
8a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 3-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 4-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 6-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor/ 10-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 20-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8f Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 25-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8g Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 30-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8h Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Compactor 40-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8i Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Roll-off Box 10-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8j Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Roll-off Box 20-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8k Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Roll-off Box 25-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8l Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Roll-off Box 30-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 8m Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Permanent Roll-off Box 40-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$
9. Permanent Compactor and Roll-Off Box - Source Separated Yard Trimmings Processing Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
# Sector/Stream Description Size
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
Frequency of Collection
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component # Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection Total Laguna Hills Rate
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Total Lake Forest Rate
Attachment D.1 - Maximum Rates to be Charged Assuming Cross-Jurisdictional Efficiencies between Lake Forest and Laguna Hills Fill in the rates proposed as the maximum rates to customers below for each level of service assuming cross-jurisdictional routing efficiencies between the two cities (Laguna Hills and Lake Forest) and assuming that all Commercial and Multi-family Divertible Materials (i.e. Single-stream Recyclables, Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings) will be provided at a collection rate that is half the cost of equivalent MSW service. MSW rates may include any costs that are not recovered by offering Divertible Materials collection programs at the 50% reduced rate as requested by the City. Rates must be broken down to show the collection cost, disposal cost and capital costs (the capital component will not be escalated). The procedure for adjusting costs throughout the term of the contract appears in Article 14 of the Agreement. A sample calculation is shown in Attachment J. The disposal portion will only be adjusted as that cost actually changes. Disposal costs are a pass through cost and cannot include any mark up, overhead or administrative costs. As the amount of material being collected and handled is increasingly shifting into diversion, providing diversion services at no charge is no longer feasible and therefore is not permitted in this form. Best practices have identified that a Divertible materials collection rate that is 50% of the MSW rate obtains optimal generator participation. As noted in Section 6. MSW Rate Sheet commercial MSW rates may include any costs that are not recovered by offering Divertible Materials collection programs at 50% the rate for MSW. The rate proposed for collection of commercial, multi-family, temporary bin, temporary roll off, permanent roll off and compactor customers for divertible materials must be 50% lower than the rate proposed for collection of MSW materials. # Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital Component
Indicate the selected source-separated food scrap processing technology for permanent and temporary roll-offs and compactors using the drop down:
Select a Processing Technology for Source Seperated Food Scraps Collected in Permanent and Temporary Roll-offs and Compactors
Indicate the selected source-separated yard trimmings processing technology for permanent and temporary roll-offs and compactors using the drop down:
Select a Processing Technology for Source Seperated Yard Trimmings Collected in Permanent and Temporary Roll-offs and Compactors Indicate the selected co-collected food scraps and yard trimmings processing technology for permanent and temporary roll-offs and compactors using the drop down:
Select a Processing Technology for Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Collected in Permanent and Temporary Roll-offs and Compactors <-- the selected processing methodology will be shown in the Processing Component cell for the corresponding rate item in Sections 8 and 13 below. Proposers will provide further details re: their proposed processing facility for this service line in the corresponding proposal form. <-- the selected processing methodology will be shown in the Processing Component cell for the corresponding rate item in Sections 9 and 14 below. Proposers will provide further details re: their proposed processing facility for this service line in the corresponding proposal form. <-- the selected processing methodology will be shown in the Processing Component cell for the corresponding rate item in Sections 10 and 15 below. Proposers will provide further details re: their proposed processing facility for this service line in the corresponding proposal form.
Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
362
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Source
Seperated Yard Trimmings
Collected in Permanent and
Temporary Roll-offs and
Compactors
9a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 3-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 4-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 6-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor/ 10-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 20-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9f Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 25-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9g Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 30-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9h Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Compactor 40-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9i Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Roll-off Box 10-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9j Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Roll-off Box 20-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9k Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Roll-off Box 25-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9l Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Roll-off Box 30-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 9m Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Permanent Roll-off Box 40-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$
10. Permanent Compactor and Roll-Off Box - Co-collected Food Scraps and Yard Trimmings Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Co-collected
Food Scraps and Yard
Trimmings Collected in
Permanent and Temporary Roll-
offs and Compactors
10a
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 3-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10b
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 4-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10c
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 6-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10d
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor/ 10-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10e
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 20-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10f
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 25-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10g
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 30-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10h
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Compactor 40-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10i
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Roll-off Box 10-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10j
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Roll-off Box 20-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10k
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Roll-off Box 25-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10l
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Roll-off Box 30-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 10m
Commercial/Multi-family Co-
collected Food Scraps and
Yard Trimmings
Permanent Roll-off Box 40-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$
11. Permanent Compactor and Roll-Off Box - MSW Direct-hauled to the Landfill Service Labor Fuel Collection
11a Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 3-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11b Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 4-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11c Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 6-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11d Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor/ 10-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11e Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 20-yard compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11f Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 25-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11g Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 30-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11h Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Compactor 40-yard Compactor On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11i Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Roll-off Box 10-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11j Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Roll-off Box 20-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11k Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Roll-off Box 25-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11l Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Roll-off Box 30-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$ 11m Commercial/Multi-family MSW Permanent Roll-off Box 40-yard Roll-off Box On-call of scheduled service (cost per collection) -$ -$ -$ -$
12. Temporary Bin and Roll-Off Bin Divertible Service - Single-Material Recyclables and Single-Stream Recyclables Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component Disposal Component
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Pavement Impact Cost Component Total Lake Forest Rate
# Sector/Stream Description Size
# Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Non-escalating Capital Component Total Base Rate
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
# Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Total Lake Forest Rate
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Frequency of Collection
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
363
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection Clean MRF
12a
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12a
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12a
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12b
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12b
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12b
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12c
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12c
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12c
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12d
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12d
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12d
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12e
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12e
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12e
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12f
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 20-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12f
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 20-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12f
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 20-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12g
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 25-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12g
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 25-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12g
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 25-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12h
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 30-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12h
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 30-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12h
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 30-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12i
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 40-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12i
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 40-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 12i
Commercial/Multi-family Single-
material and Single-stream
Recyclables Service
Temporary Bin 40-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$
13. Temporary Bin and Roll-Off Bin Divertible Service - Source-separated Food Scraps Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Source
Seperated Food Scraps
Collected in Permanent and
Temporary Roll-offs and
Compactors
13a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate
# Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection # Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel) Total Lake Forest Rate Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital Component Total Base Rate Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
364
Proposal Form 29a - Proposed Maximum Rates to be Charged 13c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13f Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 20-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13f Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 20-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13f Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 20-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13g Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 25-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13g Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 25-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13g Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 25-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13h Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 30-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13h Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 30-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13h Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 30-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13i Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 40-yard Roll-off
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13i Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 40-yard Roll-off
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 13i Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Food Scraps Temporary Bin 40-yard Roll-off
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$
14. Temporary Bin and Roll-Off Bin Divertible Service - Source-separated Yard Trimmings Processing Component
Labor Fuel Collection
Select a Processing
Technology for Source
Seperated Yard Trimmings
Collected in Permanent and
Temporary Roll-offs and
Compactors
14a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14a Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 2-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14b Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 3-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14c Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 4-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14d Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 6-yard Bin
Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off Weekly (i.e. Monday
collection, with the collection
again on the following
Monday - cost per collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off Weekend (i.e. collection on
Saturday or Sunday - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ 14e Commercial/Multi-family Source-
separated Yard Trimmings Temporary Bin 10-yard Roll-off Same day (same day
collection service - cost per
collection)
-$ -$ -$ -$ Lake Forest Procurement
Cost Component # Sector/Stream Description Size Frequency of Collection Collection Component (85% Labor and 15% Fuel)
Disposal Component Non-escalating Capital
Component Total Base Rate
Laguna Hills Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Laguna Hills Rate
Lake Forest Pavement
Impact Cost Component
Total Lake Forest Rate
Laguna Hills Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
Laguna Hills
Procurement Cost
Component
Lake Forest Regulatory
Compliance Cost
Component
DRAFT
Item: 14
365