Agenda packet — Lake Forest City Council, November 19, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.71 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE PITTSFORD DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.0% 99.7%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 98.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.5% 96.9%
55 X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 93.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.8% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.8% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 74.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.9% 67.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.6% 61.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.5% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 49.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.5% 42.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 37.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.5% 30.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.9% 24.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.5% 18.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.5% 14.2%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 2.8% 10.7%
X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 8.0%
X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 5.5%
X X X X 4 1.4% 3.1%
X X 2 0.7% 1.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 0.7% 1.7%
35 X X 2 0.7% 1.0%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 289
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 62.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.7 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-55

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE PITTSFORD DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.7%
57 X 98.6%
56 X 96.9%
55 X 93.4%
54 X 91.0%
53 X 86.2%
52 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 74.4% }PACE
50 X 67.5% }PACE
49 X 61.6% }PACE
48 X 55.0% }PACE
47 X 49.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 42.6% }PACE
45 X 37.0% }PACE
44 X 30.1% }PACE
43 X 24.6% }PACE
42 X 18.7%
41 X 14.2% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.7%
39 X 8.0%
38 X 5.5%
HCI
38 X 5.5%
37 X 3.1%
36 X 1.7%
35 X 1.0%
34 X 0.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 62.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.7 %
Lake Forest 2024-55

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF VISTA TERRACE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH (WB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.21
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.07
TOTAL COLLISIONS 36 7.20 1.26

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSION / REGENCY / VISTA TERRACE/ RANCHO / 241 RAMPS / TOWN CTR

CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSION / REGENCY / VISTA TERRACE / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE 19,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSION / REGENCY / VISTA TERRACE / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / HOTEL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Lake Forest 2024-56
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and hotels. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.80 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X X 2 0.9% 99.1%
X X X X 4 1.8% 98.2%
55 X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.5% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 82.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.7% 75.7%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.7% 67.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.3% 58.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.2% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 40.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 34.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.4% 29.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 23.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 18.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.1% 12.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 8.7%
40 X X X X X 5 2.3% 5.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 2.8%
X 1 0.5% 1.4%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 218
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.4 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-56

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.5%
57 X 99.1%
56 X 98.2%
55 X 96.3%
54 X 93.1% }PACE
53 X 87.6% }PACE
52 X 82.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 75.7% }PACE
50 X 67.0% }PACE
49 X 58.3% }PACE
48 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 40.8% }PACE
46 X 34.9% }PACE
45 X 29.8% }PACE
44 X 23.4%
43 X 18.8%
42 X 12.8% - - - - - -15PCT
41 X 8.7%
40 X 5.0%
39 X 2.8%
38 X 1.4%
HCI
38 X 1.4%
37 X 0.9%
36 X 0.5%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.4 %
Lake Forest 2024-56

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOWNE CENTER DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OFPORTOLA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (WB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 1.84

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
8,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOWNE CENTRE / PORTOLA

CROSSWALKS AT TOWNE CENTRE / PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Lake Forest 2024-57
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.

0.14 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOWNE CENTER DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
50 X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.1% 97.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 95.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 91.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 83.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.0% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.9% 66.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 57.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.9% 47.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 38.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 31.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 21.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 15.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 8.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 4.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 2.1% 4.1%
35 X X X 3 2.1% 2.1%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 146
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-57

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOWNE CENTER DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.3%
49 X 97.9%
48 X 95.9%
47 X 91.1% }PACE
46 X 83.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 77.4% }PACE
44 X 66.4% }PACE
43 X 57.5% }PACE
42 X 47.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 38.4% }PACE
40 X 31.5% }PACE
39 X 21.2% }PACE
38 X 15.1% }PACE
HCI
38 X 15.1% }PACE
37 X 8.9% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 4.1%
35 X 2.1%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
Lake Forest 2024-57

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE PORTOLA PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ALTER

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.24
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 2.17

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA, STOP - BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA
6,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO RV PARKING THIS BLOCK

BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT -GRADUAL DOWNHILL (WB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & SOLID DBL YELLOW

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Lake Forest 2024-58
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely commercial. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 49.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE PORTOLA PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
55 0 0.0% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 97.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 93.1%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 83.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 75.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 69.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 60.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.3% 50.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 39.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 31.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 22.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 14.5%
40 X X X X X 5 3.1% 8.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 5.7%
X X 2 1.3% 3.8%
X X 2 1.3% 2.5%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-58

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAKE FOREST DRIVE PORTOLA PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.4%
55 X 99.4%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.1%
52 X 97.5%
51 X 93.1%
50 X 88.7% }PACE
49 X 83.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 75.5% }PACE
47 X 69.2% }PACE
46 X 60.4% }PACE
45 X 50.9% }PACE
44 X 39.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 31.4% }PACE
42 X 22.0% }PACE
41 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
40 X 8.8%
39 X 5.7%
38 X 3.8%
HCI
38 X 3.8%
37 X 2.5%
36 X 1.3%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-58

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAMBERT STREET ASPAN ST TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LAKE FOREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - ASPAN / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT ASPAN / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING 10pm-6am

MANY AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Lambert 2024-59
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 3.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.17 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAMBERT STREET ASPAN ST TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
40 X 1 0.6% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X 2 1.3% 96.9%
X X X X 4 2.5% 95.6%
X 1 0.6% 93.1%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 92.5%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.6% 93.1%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 89.3%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 84.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 81.1%
X X 2 1.3% 76.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 75.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 66.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 59.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 56.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 45.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.3% 37.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 25.8%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 17.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 11.9%
20 X X X X X X 6 3.8% 7.5%
X X X X 4 2.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
File: Lambert 2024-59

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LAMBERT STREET ASPAN ST TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 98.7%
39 X 98.1%
38 X 96.9%
HCI
38 X 96.9%
37 X 95.6%
36 X 93.1%
35 X 92.5%
34 X 89.3%
33 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
32 X 81.1%
31 X 76.7%
30 X 75.5% }PACE
29 X 66.7% }PACE
28 X 59.7% }PACE
27 X 56.0% }PACE
26 X 45.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 37.1% }PACE
24 X 25.8% }PACE
23 X 20.8% }PACE
22 X 17.6% }PACE
21 X 11.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 7.5%
19 X 3.8%
18 X 1.3%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
Lambert 2024-59

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF DALEVIEW

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.54

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD
24,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SCE SUB-STATION / WATER DISTRICT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Los Alisos 2024-60
NP = NOT POSTED
This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), SCE sub- station and a water district. Field notes state the roadway has slight to gradual curves, no stopping any time, bike lanes and bus stops. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.4 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.29 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 1.2% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X X X 3 1.8% 98.2%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 93.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 77.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 71.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.0% 65.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.4% 57.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 50.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.6% 43.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 35.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 29.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 29.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 23.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 17.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 12.9%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 7.4%
X X X 3 1.8% 4.3%
30 X X X 3 1.8% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 163
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.2 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-60

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.8%
48 X 98.2%
47 X 96.3%
46 X 93.3%
45 X 88.3%
44 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 77.9% }PACE
42 X 71.8% }PACE
41 X 65.6% }PACE
40 X 57.7% }PACE
39 X 50.3% }PACE
38 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 35.0% }PACE
36 X 29.4% }PACE
35 X 23.3% }PACE
34 X 17.2%
33 X 12.9% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 7.4%
31 X 4.3%
30 X 2.5%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.2 %
Los Alisos 2024-60

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MUIRLANDS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (EB) / 50 (WB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 8 1.60 0.44

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION / 3 LANES (EB btwn Brough and Muirlands)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS
27,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD (sch) / MUIRLANDS (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO (EB) / YES (WB)

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (EB) / PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS NO STOPPING ANYTIME 2pm-6pm (WB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UPHILL GRADE (EB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (WB) - YES / YES (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / EL TORO PARK / CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - CONFLICTING SPEED, REMOVE 50 MPH (WB) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Los Alisos 2024-61
This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (non- fronting), park and church. Field notes show that this segment has conflicting speed limits with a 45 mph speed limit posted in the eastbound direction and a 50 mph speed limit posted in the westbound direction. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 39 to 48 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.2%
X X X X 4 1.8% 96.8%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 95.0%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5% 88.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 83.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 78.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.7% 71.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.6% 64.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.9% 55.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.4% 49.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 43.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 36.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.9% 29.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.5% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 18.2%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 13.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 10.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 10.0%
35 X X X X X X 6 2.7% 6.4%
X X X 3 1.4% 3.6%
X X X 3 1.4% 2.3%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 220
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.2 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-61

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.5%
53 X 98.2%
52 X 96.8%
51 X 95.0%
50 X 91.8%
49 X 88.2%
48 X 83.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 78.6% }PACE
46 X 71.8% }PACE
45 X 64.1% }PACE
44 X 55.5% }PACE
43 X 49.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 43.2% }PACE
41 X 36.4% }PACE
40 X 29.5% }PACE
39 X 23.6% }PACE
38 X 18.2%
HCI
38 X 18.2%
37 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 10.0%
35 X 6.4%
34 X 3.6%
33 X 2.3%
32 X 0.9%
31 X 0.5%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.2 %
Los Alisos 2024-61

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:55 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BRUSSELS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH /*25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.13
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.35

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
28,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS (sch) / JERONIMO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SCHOOL / PARK / BUSINESS (at Jeronimo) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, * 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Los Alisos 2024-62 The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.59 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:55 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 97.9%
X X X X 4 2.1% 96.3%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.3% 94.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 89.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 85.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 80.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.6% 73.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 63.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 54.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 45.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 38.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 29.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.5% 24.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 13.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 8.6%
X X X X 4 2.1% 5.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 2.1% 5.3%
35 X X 2 1.1% 3.2%
X X X 3 1.6% 2.1%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 187
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-62

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:55 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 98.9%
52 X 97.9%
51 X 96.3%
50 X 94.1%
49 X 89.8% }PACE
48 X 85.0% }PACE
47 X 80.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 73.3% }PACE
45 X 63.6% }PACE
44 X 54.5% }PACE
43 X 45.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 38.5% }PACE
41 X 29.4% }PACE
40 X 24.6% }PACE
39 X 17.1%
38 X 13.4% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 13.4% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 8.6%
36 X 5.3%
35 X 3.2%
34 X 2.1%
33 X 0.5%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
Los Alisos 2024-62

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD JERONIMO RD TO MADERO
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF 2ND ST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.06
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.06
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.52

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
28,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TARGET / MADERO

CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / TARGET / MADERO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE (Btwn Target & Madero)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - YES / ONE (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / GAS STATION (at Madero) / COMMERCIAL (at Jeronimo) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Los Alisos 2024-63
* 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.33 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD JERONIMO RD TO MADERO
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.5%
X X 2 1.1% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.6% 98.4%
X X X X 4 2.1% 96.8%
50 X X X X X 5 2.6% 94.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 92.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 87.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.9% 83.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.5% 76.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.6% 66.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.0% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.5% 47.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.9% 37.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 30.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.3% 24.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 19.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 14.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 10.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 7.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 7.4%
35 X X X X 4 2.1% 4.2%
X X X 3 1.6% 2.1%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 189
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-63

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD JERONIMO RD TO MADERO
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.5%
53 X 99.5%
52 X 98.4%
51 X 96.8%
50 X 94.7%
49 X 92.1% }PACE
48 X 87.8% }PACE
47 X 83.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 76.2% }PACE
45 X 66.7% }PACE
44 X 56.1% }PACE
43 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 37.6% }PACE
41 X 30.7% }PACE
40 X 24.3% }PACE
39 X 19.0%
38 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 10.1%
36 X 7.4%
35 X 4.2%
34 X 2.1%
33 X 0.5%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
Los Alisos 2024-63

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MONARCH BOULEVARD ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF GOLDEN ROD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.09

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
1,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
CUT OUT PARKING (SB) at Golden Rod

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Alton) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ROUND-ABOUT AT DIMENSION-CATALINA

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Monarch 2024-64
This segment of Monarch Bolevard is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non- fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sweeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MONARCH BOULEVARD ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 97.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 96.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.8% 91.7%
40 X X X X 4 3.3% 86.0%
X X X X 4 3.3% 82.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 79.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.6% 70.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 58.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.4% 47.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 27.3%
X X X X 4 3.3% 19.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 15.7%
30 X X 2 1.7% 10.7%
X X 2 1.7% 9.1%
X X 2 1.7% 7.4%
X X 2 1.7% 5.8%
X X 2 1.7% 4.1%
25 X 1 0.8% 2.5%
0 0.0% 1.7%
X 1 0.8% 1.7%
0 0.0% 0.8%
0 0.0% 0.8%
20 0 0.0% 0.8%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
File: Monarch 2024-64

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MONARCH BOULEVARD ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.2%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 97.5%
HCI
43 X 97.5%
42 X 96.7% }PACE
41 X 91.7% }PACE
40 X 86.0% }PACE
39 X 82.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.3% }PACE
37 X 70.2% }PACE
36 X 58.7% }PACE
35 X 47.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 35.5% }PACE
33 X 27.3% }PACE
32 X 19.0%
31 X 15.7%
30 X 10.7% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 9.1%
28 X 7.4%
27 X 5.8%
26 X 4.1%
25 X 2.5%
24 X 1.7%
23 X 1.7%
22 X 0.8%
21 X 0.8%
20 X 0.8%
19 X 0.8%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
A - 2
Monarch 2024-64

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MONTCLIFF DRIVE RIMHURST DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH (NB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RIMHURST / EL TORO

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING 10am-2pm, 2nd & 4th THURSDAY

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PARTIAL SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (shopping Ctr) / BUSINESS (at El Toro) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SOUTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Montcliff 2024-65 The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 30 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.

0.19 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MONTCLIFF DRIVE RIMHURST DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.5% 99.1%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 95.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 84.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 77.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 68.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 61.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 53.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 42.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.7% 34.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 24.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 17.7%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 9.7%
X X X X 4 3.5% 5.3%
20 X X 2 1.8% 1.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 113
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.7 %
File: Montcliff 2024-65

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MONTCLIFF DRIVE RIMHURST DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 95.6%
32 X 91.2% }PACE
31 X 84.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
30 X 77.0% }PACE
29 X 68.1% }PACE
28 X 61.1% }PACE
27 X 53.1% }PACE
26 X 42.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 34.5% }PACE
24 X 24.8% }PACE
23 X 17.7% }PACE
22 X 9.7% - - - - - -15PCT
21 X 5.3%
20 X 1.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.7 %
Montcliff 2024-65

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT (650' s/o BAKE) TO LAKE FOREST DR DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF FERGREEN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.17
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.50

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
13,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / ASPEN-OAKWOOD

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / ASPEN-OAKWOOD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Lake Forest) / RESIDENTIAL (NF-Mobile Homes) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-66
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT (650' s/o BAKE) TO LAKE FOREST DR DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
55 X X X X 4 2.5% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 96.9%
X 1 0.6% 95.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 95.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 91.2%
50 X X X X 4 2.5% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 76.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 62.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 56.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 37.7%
X X X X 4 2.5% 29.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 27.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 21.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 15.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 13.2%
X X X X 4 2.5% 6.9%
X 1 0.6% 4.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.6% 4.4%
35 X X X X 4 2.5% 3.8%
0 0.0% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
0 0.0% 0.6%
0 0.0% 0.6%
30 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
File: Muirlands 2024-66

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT (650' s/o BAKE) TO LAKE FOREST DR DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.4%
54 X 96.9%
53 X 95.6%
52 X 95.0%
51 X 91.2%
50 X 85.5%
49 X 83.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 76.1% }PACE
47 X 69.8% }PACE
46 X 62.3% }PACE
45 X 56.6% }PACE
44 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 37.7% }PACE
42 X 29.6% }PACE
41 X 27.0% }PACE
40 X 21.4% }PACE
39 X 15.1%
38 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 6.9%
36 X 4.4%
35 X 3.8%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 1.3%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.6%
30 X 0.6%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
Muirlands 2024-66

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF OSWEGO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 17 3.40 1.03

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
19,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / VILLAGE CTR-DYLAN / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / VILLAGE CTR-DYLAN / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL"S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Lake Forest & El Toro & Ridge Route) / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-67
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.47 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.2% 99.3%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 97.0%
50 X X 2 1.5% 93.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 91.9%
X 1 0.7% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.9% 86.7%
X X X X 4 3.0% 80.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.7% 77.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 71.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 63.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 16.3% 56.3% X X X X X X X X X 9 6.7% 40.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.1% 33.3%
X X X X 4 3.0% 22.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 19.3%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 14.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 11.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 11.1%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.4% 6.7%
X 1 0.7% 2.2%
X 1 0.7% 1.5%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 135
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: Muirlands 2024-67

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.3%
51 X 97.0%
50 X 93.3%
49 X 91.9%
48 X 87.4%
47 X 86.7% }PACE
46 X 80.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 77.8% }PACE
44 X 71.1% }PACE
43 X 63.7% }PACE
42 X 56.3% }PACE
41 X 40.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 33.3% }PACE
39 X 22.2% }PACE
38 X 19.3% }PACE
HCI
38 X 19.3% }PACE
37 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 11.1%
35 X 6.7%
34 X 2.2%
33 X 1.5%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
Muirlands 2024-67

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ENTRADOS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 25 5.00 1.15

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
20,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND & 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at El Toro & Ridge Route) / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-68
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had four (4) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) collision involved a serious injury, (1) involved a pedestrian, and (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.57 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 98.2%
X X X 3 1.8% 95.3%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 93.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 88.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.8% 78.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.8% 69.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 15.3% 60.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.4% 45.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.4% 35.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 26.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 20.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.8% 15.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 6.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.8%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%

0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 170
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
File: Muirlands 2024-68

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.8%
52 X 98.2%
51 X 95.3%
50 X 93.5%
49 X 88.8% }PACE
48 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 78.2% }PACE
46 X 69.4% }PACE
45 X 60.6% }PACE
44 X 45.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 35.9% }PACE
42 X 26.5% }PACE
41 X 20.0% }PACE
40 X 15.3% }PACE
39 X 6.5% - - - - - -15PCT
38 X 1.8%
HCI
38 X 1.8%
37 X 1.2%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
Muirlands 2024-68

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD EL TORO ROAD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.11
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 4 0.80 0.21
TOTAL COLLISIONS 31 6.20 1.63

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LOS ALISOS / EL TORO / PARKVIEW

CROSSWALKS AT LOS ALISOS / EL TORO / PARKVIEW
21,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT LOS ALISOS / EL TORO / PARKVIEW

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / EL TORO PARK & HEROES PARK (at Los Alisos) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-69
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial at El Toro Road and parks and intermediate at Los Alisos Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school, park or commercial shopping center within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD EL TORO ROAD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.7%
X 1 0.7% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.0%
50 X X X X X 5 3.3% 96.7%
X X X X 4 2.6% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 90.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 86.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 79.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.6% 74.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.9% 61.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 53.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.9% 37.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.3% 29.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 20.5%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 16.6%
X X X X 4 2.6% 13.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 10.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 10.6%
35 X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 6.6%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
0 0.0% 0.7%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 151
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.6 %
File: Muirlands 2024-69

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD EL TORO ROAD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.3%
53 X 98.7%
52 X 98.7%
51 X 98.0%
50 X 96.7%
49 X 93.4%
48 X 90.7% }PACE
47 X 86.8% }PACE
46 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 74.2% }PACE
44 X 61.6% }PACE
43 X 53.6% }PACE
42 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 37.7% }PACE
40 X 29.8% }PACE
39 X 20.5% }PACE
38 X 16.6%
HCI
38 X 16.6%
37 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 10.6%
35 X 6.6%
34 X 2.0%
33 X 0.7%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.6 %
Muirlands 2024-69

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

NORMANDALE DRIVE OSTERMAN RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF VISTA ESTATE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 1.07
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.36
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 3.20

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO, STOP - OSTERMAN

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME & NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (NB) / YES / NO (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO OVERNIGHT VEHICLES

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMUNITY TENNIS COURTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Normandale 2024-70
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.55 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

NORMANDALE DRIVE OSTERMAN RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X X 2 1.7% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.5% 98.3%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 94.8%
X X X 3 2.6% 89.6%
40 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 87.0%
X X X X 4 3.5% 81.7%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 78.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 72.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 63.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.3% 53.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 63.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.3% 53.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 41.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 33.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 27.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 18.3%
30 X X X X X 5 4.3% 13.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 8.7%
X X 2 1.7% 3.5%
0 0.0% 1.7%
X 1 0.9% 1.7%
25 X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.5 %
File: Normandale 2024-70

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

NORMANDALE DRIVE OSTERMAN RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 98.3%
42 X 94.8%
41 X 89.6%
40 X 87.0%
39 X 81.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 78.3% }PACE
HCI
38 X 78.3% }PACE
37 X 72.2% }PACE
36 X 63.5% }PACE
35 X 53.0% }PACE
34 X 41.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 33.9% }PACE
32 X 27.0% }PACE
31 X 18.3% }PACE
30 X 13.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 8.7% }PACE
28 X 3.5%
27 X 1.7%
26 X 1.7%
25 X 0.9%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.5 %
Normandale 2024-70

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OLYMPUS SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO CIVIC CENTER DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PALISADE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 91.4 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NP

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS YIELD - SERRANO SUMITT / CIVIC CENTER, STOP - PALISADE 800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
7/16/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS YIELD - SERRANO SUMITT / CIVIC CENTER, STOP - PALISADE

CROSSWALKS AT SERRANO SUMITT / PALISADE / CIVIC CENTER

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ROUNDABOUTS (at Serrano Sumitt / Civic Center)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL / CITY HALL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Olympus 2024-71
This segment of Olympus is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and City Hall. Field notes state that the roadway has roundabouts at Serrano Summit Drive and Civic Center Drive and has heave on-street parking. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 20 to 29 mph, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.

0.17 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OLYMPUS SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO CIVIC CENTER DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.0% 100.0%
30 X X X X 4 3.8% 99.0%
X X X X 4 3.8% 95.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 91.4%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.5% 78.1%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.3% 68.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.3% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.4% 41.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.4% 28.6%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 16.2%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.7% 9.5%
X X 2 1.9% 3.8%
X 1 1.0% 1.9%
X 1 1.0% 1.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 105
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
File: Olympus 2024-71

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OLYMPUS SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO CIVIC CENTER DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 99.0%
29 X 95.2% }PACE
28 X 91.4% }PACE
27 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
26 X 78.1% }PACE
25 X 68.6% }PACE
24 X 55.2% }PACE
23 X 41.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 28.6% }PACE
21 X 16.2% }PACE
20 X 9.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
19 X 3.8%
18 X 1.9%
17 X 1.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
A - 2
Olympus 2024-71

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OSTERMAN ROAD REGENCY LN TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SIENA TERRANCE APTS ENTRANCE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 36.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
7/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - REGENCY / PITTSFORD

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING, 10am-2pm, 2nd-4th FRIDAY

MANY AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) / YES / NO (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / REGENCY PARK (at Regency) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Osterman 2024-72
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.77 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OSTERMAN ROAD REGENCY LN TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 X X X 3 2.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 97.5%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 95.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 90.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.9% 83.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 73.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.9% 83.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 73.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 62.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 53.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 44.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 38.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 30.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.8% 22.3%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 16.5%
X X X X 4 3.3% 11.6%
X X X X 4 3.3% 8.3%
25 X X X 3 2.5% 5.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 2.5%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File: Osterman 2024-72

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OSTERMAN ROAD REGENCY LN TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 97.5%
38 X 95.0%
HCI
38 X 95.0%
37 X 90.9% }PACE
36 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
35 X 73.6% }PACE
34 X 62.8% }PACE
33 X 53.7% }PACE
32 X 44.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 38.0% }PACE
30 X 30.6% }PACE
29 X 22.3% }PACE
28 X 16.5% }PACE
27 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
26 X 8.3%
25 X 5.0%
24 X 2.5%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
Osterman 2024-72

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OVERLAKE DRIVE LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF PINTREE & NORTH OF TWIN LAKES

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.94
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.87

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE

CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES & BEND RIGHT-BEND LEFT (at Pine Tree) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (many areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO STRIPING AFTER NEW SLURRY SEAL
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Overlake 2024-73
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 4.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.65 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OVERLAKE DRIVE LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
35 X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 98.3%
X X X X 4 3.4% 94.1%
X 1 0.8% 90.7%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 89.8%
30 X X 2 1.7% 85.6%
X X X X 4 3.4% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.9% 80.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 68.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 62.7%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 15.3% 56.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 16.9% 41.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 24.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 16.9%
X X X X 4 3.4% 9.3%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.1% 5.9%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 118
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.8 %
File: Overlake 2024-73

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

OVERLAKE DRIVE LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 99.2%
34 X 98.3%
33 X 94.1%
32 X 90.7%
31 X 89.8%
30 X 85.6%
29 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 80.5% }PACE
27 X 68.6% }PACE
26 X 62.7% }PACE
25 X 56.8% }PACE
24 X 41.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 24.6% }PACE
22 X 16.9% }PACE
21 X 9.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 5.9% }PACE
19 X 0.8%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.8 %
Overlake 2024-73

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PALMWOOD DRIVE PEACHWOOD (N) TO PEACHWOOD (S)
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 3:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF WISTERIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 1.50
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 5.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PEACHWOOD (N) / PEACHWOOD (S)
600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PEACHWOOD (N) / PEACHWOOD (S)

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (Heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING 10am-2pm 1st-3rd Wed (Street Sweeping)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE - SWEEPING "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Many Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (Multi-Family-NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Palmwood 2024-74
This segment of Palmwood Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is multifamily residential. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 33.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 25 to 34 mph, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.61 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PALMWOOD DRIVE PEACHWOOD (N) TO PEACHWOOD (S)
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 3:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 99.1%
X X 2 1.8% 97.2%
X X 2 1.8% 95.4%
X X 2 1.8% 93.6%
35 X X X X X X X 7 6.4% 91.7%
X X X X X 5 4.6% 85.3%
X X 2 1.8% 80.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.3% 78.9%
X X X X X X 6 5.5% 71.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.8% 66.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.2% 53.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.1% 44.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.9% 33.9%
X X X X 4 3.7% 22.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.0% 18.3%
X X X 3 2.8% 7.3%
X X X 3 2.8% 4.6%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
0 0.0% 0.9%
20 X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 109
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.3 %
File: Palmwood 2024-74

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PALMWOOD DRIVE PEACHWOOD (N) TO PEACHWOOD (S)
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 3:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 99.1%
38 X 97.2%
37 X 95.4%
36 X 93.6%
35 X 91.7%
34 X 85.3% }PACE
33 X 80.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
32 X 78.9% }PACE
31 X 71.6% }PACE
30 X 66.1% }PACE
29 X 53.2% }PACE
28 X 44.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 33.9% }PACE
26 X 22.0% }PACE
25 X 18.3% }PACE
24 X 7.3% - - - - - -15PCT
23 X 4.6%
22 X 1.8%
21 X 0.9%
20 X 0.9%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.3 %
Palmwood 2024-74File:

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PALOMA PORTOLA PKWY TO ALTON PKWY-ROMANO
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MIMOSA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA

CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Coronado to Portola)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED ISLAND / DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Paloma 2024-75
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.59 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PALOMA PORTOLA PKWY TO ALTON PKWY-ROMANO
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.6% 97.6%
X X X X 4 3.2% 96.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 92.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.2% 88.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.2% 80.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.0% 73.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 65.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 59.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 50.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.6% 41.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 32.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 26.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 20.8%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.8% 16.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 11.2%
X X X X X 5 4.0% 6.4%
X X 2 1.6% 2.4%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 125
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.8 %
File: Paloma 2024-75

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PALOMA PORTOLA PKWY TO ALTON PKWY-ROMANO
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 97.6%
HCI
44 X 99.2%
43 X 97.6%
42 X 96.0%
41 X 92.8% }PACE
40 X 88.0% }PACE
39 X 80.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 73.6% }PACE
37 X 65.6% }PACE
36 X 59.2% }PACE
35 X 50.4% }PACE
34 X 41.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 32.0% }PACE
32 X 26.4% }PACE
31 X 20.8%
30 X 16.0%
29 X 11.2% - - - - - -15PCT
28 X 6.4%
27 X 2.4%
26 X 0.8%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.8 %
Paloma 2024-75

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO SOMBRA TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF PASEO VEREDA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 35.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO

CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / RANCHO SERRANO PARK / SMALL PARK / GREENBELT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Paseo Sombra 2024-76
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 0.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO SOMBRA TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0 0.0% 99.1%
0 0.0% 99.1%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
40 X X 2 1.9% 98.1%
X X X X 4 3.7% 96.3%
0 0.0% 92.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.4% 86.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.3% 78.5%
X X X X X X X 7 6.5% 68.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.1% 61.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 48.6%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 41.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.2% 35.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 24.3%
X 1 0.9% 18.7%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 17.8%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 13.1%
25 X X X X X X 6 5.6% 8.4%
0 0.0% 2.8%
X 1 0.9% 2.8%
X X 2 1.9% 1.9%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 107
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.8 %
File: Paseo Sombra 2024-76

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO SOMBRA TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.1%
HCI
43 X 99.1%
42 X 99.1%
41 X 99.1%
40 X 98.1%
39 X 96.3%
38 X 92.5%
37 X 92.5% }PACE
36 X 86.9% }PACE
35 X 78.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
34 X 68.2% }PACE
33 X 61.7% }PACE
32 X 48.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 41.1% }PACE
30 X 35.5% }PACE
29 X 24.3% }PACE
28 X 18.7% }PACE
27 X 17.8%
26 X 13.1% - - - - - -15PCT
25 X 8.4%
24 X 2.8%
23 X 2.8%
22 X 1.9%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.8 %
A - 2
Paseo Sombra 2024-76

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO TRANQUILO TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF CALLE ARENAL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 36.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO

CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Paseo Tranquilo 2024-77
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 1.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO TRANQUILO TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
40 X X X 3 2.5% 98.4%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 95.9%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.0% 79.5%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 70.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.0% 63.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.2% 54.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.5% 46.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 35.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.0% 29.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 20.5%
X X X X 4 3.3% 14.8%
X X X X 4 3.3% 11.5%
X X 2 1.6% 8.2%
25 X X X X X 5 4.1% 6.6%
0 0.0% 2.5%
X 1 0.8% 2.5%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
0 0.0% 0.8%
20 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 122
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: Paseo Tranquilo 2024-77

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO TRANQUILO TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 98.4%
39 X 95.9%
38 X 91.8% }PACE
37 X 86.1% }PACE
36 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
35 X 70.5% }PACE
34 X 63.9% }PACE
33 X 54.9% }PACE
32 X 46.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 35.2% }PACE
30 X 29.5% }PACE
29 X 20.5% }PACE
28 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
27 X 11.5%
26 X 8.2%
25 X 6.6%
24 X 2.5%
23 X 2.5%
22 X 1.6%
21 X 0.8%
20 X 0.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
Paseo Tranquilo 2024-77File:

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PAULING PORTOLA PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:25 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF DESCARTES

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION - 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (Portola to Decartes) 900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION - 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (Portola to Decartes)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA, STOP - LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO RV PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE - SWEEPING "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (existing some driveways)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Pauling 2024-78
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.71 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PAULING PORTOLA PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:25 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 3.8% 96.2%
X X X X 4 3.0% 92.5%
X X X 3 2.3% 89.5%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.5% 82.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.3% 74.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.5% 66.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 14.3% 55.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.8% 41.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.8% 28.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 18.8%
X X X X 4 3.0% 13.5%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 10.5%
30 X X X 3 2.3% 6.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.8%
X 1 0.8% 1.5%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 133
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
File: Pauling 2024-78

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PAULING PORTOLA PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:25 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 99.2%
45 X 98.5%
44 X 97.7%
43 X 96.2%
HCI
43 X 96.2%
42 X 92.5%
41 X 89.5%
40 X 87.2% }PACE
39 X 82.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 74.4% }PACE
37 X 66.2% }PACE
36 X 55.6% }PACE
35 X 41.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 28.6% }PACE
33 X 18.8% }PACE
32 X 13.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
31 X 10.5% }PACE
30 X 6.0%
29 X 3.8%
28 X 1.5%
27 X 0.8%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
Pauling 2024-78

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PEACHWOOD TRABUCO RD TO TAMERISK
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PALMWOOD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
2,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO, STOP - TAMARISK

CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (EB-w/o Palmwood) / NO STOPPING & PARKING (WB)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
NO SHOULDERS (many areas of)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Peachwood 2024-79
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PEACHWOOD TRABUCO RD TO TAMERISK
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 98.5%
X 1 0.7% 97.8%

97.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 97.0%
0 0.0% 96.3%
0 0.0% 96.3%
X X 2 1.5% 96.3%
X 1 0.7% 94.8%
50 X X 2 1.5% 94.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.2% 92.6%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.9% 83.7%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 74.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.1% 70.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.1% 59.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 43.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 43.7%
X X X 3 2.2% 36.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.6% 34.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 24.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.2% 20.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.2% 14.8%
X X X 3 2.2% 9.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.4% 7.4%
0 0.0% 3.0%
X X 2 1.5% 3.0%
0 0.0% 1.5%
0 0.0% 1.5%
30 X 1 0.7% 1.5%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 135
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: Peachwood 2024-79

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PEACHWOOD TRABUCO RD TO TAMERISK
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.3%
58 X 98.5%
57 X 97.8%
56 X 97.0%
55 X 97.0%
54 X 96.3%
53 X 96.3%
52 X 96.3%
51 X 94.8%
50 X 94.1%
49 X 92.6%
48 X 87.4%
47 X 83.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 74.8% }PACE
45 X 70.4% }PACE
44 X 59.3% }PACE
43 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
43 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 43.7% }PACE
41 X 36.3% }PACE
40 X 34.1% }PACE
39 X 24.4% }PACE
38 X 20.0% }PACE
37 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.6%
35 X 7.4%
34 X 3.0%
33 X 3.0%
32 X 1.5%
31 X 1.5%
30 X 1.5%
29 X 0.7%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
Peachwood 2024-79

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PITTSFORD DRIVE NORTHCREST DR TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ELMCREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.20
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 1.77

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST, STOP - NORTHCREST CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / CHARFORD (sch) / NORTHCREST (sch) 3,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / CHARFORD (sch) / NORTHCREST (sch) PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES (heavy)

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME (n/o Elmcrest)
ARES OF RED CURB / NO PARKING MONDAYS 10am-2pm, 2nd & 4th

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S' CURES & SWEEPING "C" CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PITTSFORD PARK / ELEM SCHOOL (at Lake Forest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Pittsford 2024-80 This segment of Pittsford Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), parks and a elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph.

However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or park within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.82 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PITTSFORD DRIVE NORTHCREST DR TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.9% 95.5%
X X X 3 2.7% 94.6%
X X X X 4 3.6% 92.0%
40 X X X X 4 3.6% 88.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.4% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.8% 79.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 61.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.5% 54.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.7% 42.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.7% 31.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 20.5%
X X X X X 5 4.5% 13.4%
30 X X X X X 5 4.5% 8.9%
X X 2 1.8% 4.5%
X X 2 1.8% 2.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 112
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.5 %
File: Pittsford 2024-80

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PITTSFORD DRIVE NORTHCREST DR TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 97.3%
43 X 95.5%
HCI
43 X 95.5%
42 X 94.6%
41 X 92.0%
40 X 88.4%
39 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.5% }PACE
37 X 69.6% }PACE
36 X 61.6% }PACE
35 X 54.5% }PACE
34 X 42.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 31.3% }PACE
32 X 20.5% }PACE
31 X 13.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
30 X 8.9% }PACE
29 X 4.5%
28 X 2.7%
27 X 0.9%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.5 %
Pittsford 2024-80

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SR 241
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF RANCHO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.28

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SR241 / RANCHO / SADDLEBACK / EL TORO 35,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SR241 / RANCHO / SADDLEBACK / EL TORO

CROSSWALKS AT RANCHO / SADDLEBACK / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (SB) - PARTIAL / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / CHURCH / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SPORTS PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-81
This segment of Portola Parkway is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, church and residential (non- fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 51.0 mph and 10 mph pace range of 43 to 52 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments on Portola Parkway and Santa Margarita Parkway, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SR 241
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
55 X X X 3 1.8% 99.4%
X X X X 4 2.4% 97.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 95.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 85.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.3% 78.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.9% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 60.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 53.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.9% 46.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 40.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 33.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 28.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 23.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 28.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 23.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 17.8%
40 X X X X X X 6 3.6% 13.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 10.1%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 5.9%
X X X 3 1.8% 3.0%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 169
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.1 %
File: Portola 2024-81

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SR 241
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.4%
54 X 97.6%
53 X 95.3%
52 X 90.5% }PACE
51 X 85.2% }PACE
50 X 78.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 69.8% }PACE
48 X 60.9% }PACE
47 X 53.8% }PACE
46 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 40.2% }PACE
44 X 33.7% }PACE
43 X 28.4% }PACE
HCI
43 X 28.4% }PACE
42 X 23.1%
41 X 17.8%
40 X 13.6% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 10.1%
38 X 5.9%
37 X 3.0%
36 X 1.2%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.1 %
Portola 2024-81

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY SR 241 TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF GLENN RANCH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 0.54

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
32,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / TOWNE CTR-PAULING/ GLENN RANCH / SR241

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / TOWNE CTR-PAULING / GLENN RANCH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-82
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.64 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY SR 241 TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.1% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.1% 97.2%
X X X 3 2.1% 95.1%
50 X X X X X X 6 4.2% 93.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.2% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 78.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 69.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.7% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.7% 53.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 45.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0% 37.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 45.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0% 37.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.6% 30.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 24.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.6% 18.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.2% 12.7%
X X X X X 5 3.5% 8.5%
X X X 3 2.1% 4.9%
35 X X X X 4 2.8% 2.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 142
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.7 %
File: Portola 2024-82

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY SR 241 TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 99.3%
52 X 97.2%
51 X 95.1%
50 X 93.0%
49 X 88.7%
48 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 78.2% }PACE
46 X 69.7% }PACE
45 X 61.3% }PACE
44 X 53.5% }PACE
43 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
43 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 37.3% }PACE
41 X 30.3% }PACE
40 X 24.6% }PACE
39 X 18.3% }PACE
38 X 12.7% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 8.5%
36 X 4.9%
35 X 2.8%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.7 %
Portola 2024-82

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LAKE FOREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.30
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.75

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Auto Ctr to Bake) 25,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Auto Ctr to Bake)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / AUTO CTR / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / AUTO CTR / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-83
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.29 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
0 0.0% 97.9%
X X 2 1.4% 97.9%
50 X X X X X 5 3.4% 96.6%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 89.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3% 75.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 67.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 57.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 49.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 42.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 49.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.6% 35.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 28.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 22.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 15.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 11.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 6.9%
35 X X X X 4 2.8% 2.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 145
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
File: Portola 2024-83

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 99.3%
52 X 97.9%
51 X 97.9%
50 X 96.6%
49 X 93.1%
48 X 89.7% }PACE
47 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 75.9% }PACE
45 X 67.6% }PACE
44 X 57.9% }PACE
43 X 49.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
43 X 49.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 42.1% }PACE
41 X 35.9% }PACE
40 X 28.3% }PACE
39 X 22.1% }PACE
38 X 15.9%
37 X 11.0% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 6.9%
35 X 2.8%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
Portola 2024-83

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO ALTON PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:25 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ALTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.13
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.06
TOTAL COLLISIONS 15 3.00 0.96

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Alton to Bake) 19,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Alton to Bake)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / MARKET PL / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / MARKET PL / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL-SHOPPING CTR / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) GREENBELT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-84
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO ALTON PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:25 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 99.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 96.9%
X X X 3 2.4% 93.7%
50 X X X 3 2.4% 91.3%
X X X 3 2.4% 89.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 86.6%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 80.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 74.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.2% 64.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 54.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 45.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 54.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 36.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 29.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 22.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 17.3%
X X X X 4 3.1% 11.8%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 8.7%
35 X X X X X 5 3.9% 4.7%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 127
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.8 %
File: Portola 2024-84

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO ALTON PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:25 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 99.2%
52 X 96.9%
51 X 93.7%
50 X 91.3%
49 X 89.0%
48 X 86.6%
47 X 84.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 80.3% }PACE
45 X 74.0% }PACE
44 X 64.6% }PACE
43 X 54.3% }PACE
HCI
44 X 64.6% }PACE
43 X 54.3% }PACE
42 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 36.2% }PACE
40 X 29.9% }PACE
39 X 22.0% }PACE
38 X 17.3% }PACE
37 X 11.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 8.7%
35 X 4.7%
34 X 0.8%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.8 %
Portola 2024-84

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY ALTON PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:50 AM - 9:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF VISTA GLEN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH SB

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.21
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.42

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes Alton to Vista Glen) 4,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes Alton to Vista Glen)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / PALOMA

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / PALOMA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST NORTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-85
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the northbound direction.

0.60 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY ALTON PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:50 AM - 9:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
0 0.0% 98.5%
0 0.0% 98.5%
55 0 0.0% 98.5%
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 97.7%
X X 2 1.5% 93.1%
X X X X 4 3.1% 91.5%
50 X X X X X X 6 4.6% 88.5%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 83.8%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 74.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.8% 66.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 55.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 46.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.7% 36.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 29.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.7% 36.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 29.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 22.3%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 16.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 10.8%
X X X X 4 3.1% 6.2%
X X 2 1.5% 3.1%
X 1 0.8% 1.5%
35 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 130
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.2 %
File: Portola 2024-85

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY ALTON PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:50 AM - 9:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.2%
58 X 99.2%
57 X 98.5%
56 X 98.5%
55 X 98.5%
54 X 98.5%
53 X 97.7%
52 X 93.1%
51 X 91.5%
50 X 88.5%
49 X 83.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 80.0% }PACE
47 X 74.6% }PACE
46 X 66.2% }PACE
45 X 55.4% }PACE
44 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 36.9% }PACE
HCI
43 X 36.9% }PACE
42 X 29.2% }PACE
41 X 22.3% }PACE
40 X 16.9% }PACE
39 X 10.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
38 X 6.2%
37 X 3.1%
36 X 1.5%
35 X 0.8%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.2 %
Portola 2024-85

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:40 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CORRIDOR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.10
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.10
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 1.05

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
14,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / CORRIOR / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / CORRIDOR / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / NO RV PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL-RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rancho 2024-86
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:40 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.5% 98.5%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 97.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 93.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 89.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.5% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.5% 74.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 64.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.5% 57.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 48.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.5% 41.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 34.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.0% 29.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.5% 17.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 13.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 9.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 9.0%
35 X X X X X 5 2.5% 5.0%
X X X 3 1.5% 2.5%
X X 2 1.0% 1.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 200
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.5 %
File: Rancho 2024-86

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:40 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.5%
51 X 98.5%
50 X 97.0%
49 X 93.0%
48 X 89.0% }PACE
47 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 74.0% }PACE
45 X 64.5% }PACE
44 X 57.0% }PACE
43 X 48.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 41.0% }PACE
41 X 34.5% }PACE
40 X 29.0% }PACE
39 X 23.0% }PACE
38 X 17.5%
HCI
38 X 17.5%
37 X 13.0% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.0%
35 X 5.0%
34 X 2.5%
33 X 1.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.5 %
Rancho 2024-86

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HERMANA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.19

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / SPORTS PARK / PORTOLA

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / SPORTS PARK / PORTOLA
14,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / SPORTS PARK / PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / SKATE PARK PARKING

NO STOPPING ANYTIME / NO RV PARKING / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RES (NF) / SPORTS PARK / COMMERCIAL / SKATE PARK / VOLLEYBALL CTR / SPORTS PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rancho 2024-87
This segment of Rancho Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, skate park, volleyball center, Sherriff’s Station and community park. Field notes state that there is heavy pedestrian traffic to the volleyball center and skate park, heavy on-street parking, areas of red curbs and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a community park, a skate park and volleyball center within a distance of 1,320 feet.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.58 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.6%
50 X X X X 4 1.9% 97.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 95.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 91.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.5% 87.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.3% 80.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.9% 72.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.4% 64.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.3% 56.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.4% 47.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 40.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.4% 33.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 25.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.6% 19.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 14.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 9.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 9.7%
35 X X X X X X 6 2.8% 6.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 3.2%
X X X 3 1.4% 1.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 216
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
File: Rancho 2024-87

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.5%
51 X 98.6%
50 X 97.2%
49 X 95.4%
48 X 91.7%
47 X 87.0% }PACE
46 X 80.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 72.2% }PACE
44 X 64.4% }PACE
43 X 56.9% }PACE
42 X 47.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 40.3% }PACE
40 X 33.3% }PACE
39 X 25.9% }PACE
38 X 19.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 19.9% }PACE
37 X 14.4% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.7%
35 X 6.0%
34 X 3.2%
33 X 1.9%
32 X 0.5%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
Rancho 2024-87

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ORCHARD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
5,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

HEAVY RT TURN INTO ALLRED CORPORATE CTR DRIVEWAY (WB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMUNITY PARK (Rear-side) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rancho Pkwy S 2024-88
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 4.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.67 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.5%
X X 2 1.5% 98.5%
0 0.0% 97.1%
50 X 1 0.7% 97.1%
X 1 0.7% 96.4%
X X 2 1.5% 95.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 94.2%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 89.1%
45 X X X X X 5 3.6% 85.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 81.8%
X X X X 4 2.9% 76.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.8% 73.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 2.9% 76.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.8% 73.7%
X X X X 4 2.9% 65.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.7% 62.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.3% 50.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.5% 43.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.9% 33.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 22.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 17.5%
X X X X 4 2.9% 10.9%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 8.0%
X X 2 1.5% 4.4%
X X 2 1.5% 2.9%
30 X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 137
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
File: Rancho Pkwy S 2024-88

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.3%
53 X 98.5%
52 X 98.5%
51 X 97.1%
50 X 97.1%
49 X 96.4%
48 X 95.6%
47 X 94.2%
46 X 89.1%
45 X 85.4%
44 X 81.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 76.6% }PACE
HCI
43 X 76.6% }PACE
42 X 73.7% }PACE
41 X 65.0% }PACE
40 X 62.0% }PACE
39 X 50.4% }PACE
38 X 43.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 33.6% }PACE
36 X 22.6% }PACE
35 X 17.5% }PACE
34 X 10.9% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 8.0%
32 X 4.4%
31 X 2.9%
30 X 1.5%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
A - 2
Rancho Pkwy S 2024-88

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

REGENCY LANE LAKE FOREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF OSTERMAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK (SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST, STOP - NORMANDALE

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO OVERNIGHT VEHICLES

SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK / BUSNIESS (at Lake Forest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Regency 2024-89
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.81 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

REGENCY LANE LAKE FOREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.6% 99.1%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 96.6%
X X X X 4 3.4% 92.3%
X X X X 4 3.4% 88.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 85.5%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 76.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.1% 70.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.3% 59.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.7% 49.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 41.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.7% 49.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 41.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 32.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 23.9%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 14.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.1% 8.5%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 3.4%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 117
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
File: Regency 2024-89

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

REGENCY LANE LAKE FOREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.1%
43 X 96.6%
42 X 92.3%
41 X 88.9%
40 X 85.5% }PACE
39 X 76.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 70.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 70.9% }PACE
37 X 59.8% }PACE
36 X 49.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 41.9% }PACE
34 X 32.5% }PACE
33 X 23.9% }PACE
32 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
31 X 8.5% }PACE
30 X 3.4%
29 X 0.9%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
Regency 2024-89

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SANTIAGO CYN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SANTIAGO CYN / SADDLEBACK RANCH CROSSWALKS AT SADDLEBACK RANCH (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES (SB) - NO (NB)

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UPHILL GRADE (NB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (SB) - YES / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED (SKIP LINE) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at Santiago approach)

NO OVERSIDE VEHICLES

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PORTOLA HILLS CLUB HOUSE POOL-PICKLE BALL COURTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Ridgeline 2024-90
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards

0.28 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X 2 1.3% 96.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 95.5%
40 X X X X X 5 3.2% 93.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 90.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 85.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 69.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 60.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 69.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 60.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 51.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 43.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 27.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 18.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 11.6%
X X X X 4 2.6% 5.8%
X X 2 1.3% 3.2%
X X 2 1.3% 1.9%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 155
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.8 %
File: Ridgeline 2024-90

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.4%
43 X 98.1%
42 X 96.8%
41 X 95.5%
40 X 93.5%
39 X 90.3%
38 X 85.8% }PACE
HCI
38 X 85.8% }PACE
37 X 77.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 69.0% }PACE
35 X 60.6% }PACE
34 X 51.6% }PACE
33 X 43.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 36.1% }PACE
31 X 27.1% }PACE
30 X 18.1% }PACE
29 X 11.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 5.8%
27 X 3.2%
26 X 1.9%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.8 %
Ridgeline 2024-90

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:45PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF RICHLAND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - EL TORO / SADDLEBACK RANCH
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / SADDLEBACK RANCH (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy-SB)
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (SB) - NO / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED (SKIP LINE) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at El Toro approach)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / FIRE STATION / WATER DISTRICT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Ridgeline 2024-91
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards

0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:45PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 98.6%
X X 2 1.4% 97.8%
45 X X X 3 2.2% 96.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 94.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 76.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.8% 66.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.6% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 47.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 38.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.6% 28.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 20.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.6% 28.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 20.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 13.7%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 7.9%
X X X X 4 2.9% 4.3%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
30 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 139
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
File: Ridgeline 2024-91

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:45PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.3%
48 X 99.3%
47 X 98.6%
46 X 97.8%
45 X 96.4%
44 X 94.2%
43 X 89.9% }PACE
42 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 76.3% }PACE
40 X 66.9% }PACE
39 X 56.1% }PACE
38 X 47.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 47.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.1% }PACE
36 X 28.8% }PACE
35 X 20.1% }PACE
34 X 13.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
33 X 7.9%
32 X 4.3%
31 X 1.4%
30 X 0.7%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
Ridgeline 2024-91

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ELROND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.15
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.15
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS, STOP - ELROND CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS (sch) / ELROND (sch) 7,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS (sch) / ELROND (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL

OTHER NO STOPPING & PARKING ANYTIME

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) - YES / NO (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK /BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Ridge Route 2024-92
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 42.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
50 X 1 0.6% 99.4%
0 0.0% 98.8%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X 1 0.6% 98.2%
X X X X 4 2.4% 97.6%
45 X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 95.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.4% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 78.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.8% 72.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.6% 65.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.6% 55.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.6% 45.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.2% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 28.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 22.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 28.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.2% 16.3%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 9.0%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 6.0%
X X 2 1.2% 3.0%
30 X X 2 1.2% 1.8%
0 0.0% 0.6%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 166
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-92

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.4%
50 X 99.4%
49 X 98.8%
48 X 98.8%
47 X 98.2%
46 X 97.6%
45 X 95.2%
44 X 91.0%
43 X 85.5% }PACE
42 X 78.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 72.9% }PACE
40 X 65.1% }PACE
39 X 55.4% }PACE
38 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 36.1% }PACE
36 X 28.9% }PACE
35 X 22.9% }PACE
34 X 16.3% }PACE
33 X 9.0% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 6.0%
31 X 3.0%
30 X 1.8%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.6%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
Ridge Route 2024-92

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:10 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF RIDGE LANE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.16
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.16
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 1.45

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (1 LANE THRU TUNNEL) TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / JERONIMO, STOP - OVERLAKE / at TUNNEL CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS (sch) / OVERLAKE / JERONIMO (sch) 6,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS (sch) / OVERLAKE / JERONIMO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of) / NO PARKING MON-FRI 7am-5pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - PARTIAL / FEW (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / TENNIS CLUB RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Ridge Route 2024-93
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), club house, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.55 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:10 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 98.7%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 94.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 84.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 78.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 70.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.8% 63.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.7% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.1% 38.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 29.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 23.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 29.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 23.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 16.9%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 11.7%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 8.4%
X 1 0.6% 5.2%
30 X X X 3 1.9% 4.5%
X 1 0.6% 2.6%
X X 2 1.3% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 154
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-93

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:10 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 98.7%
45 X 94.8%
44 X 89.6% }PACE
43 X 84.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 78.6% }PACE
41 X 70.1% }PACE
40 X 63.0% }PACE
39 X 55.2% }PACE
38 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.3% }PACE
36 X 29.2% }PACE
35 X 23.4% }PACE
34 X 16.9%
33 X 11.7% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.4%
31 X 5.2%
30 X 4.5%
29 X 2.6%
28 X 1.9%
27 X 0.6%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
Ridge Route 2024-93

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:55 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF COSTA BELLA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TOLEDO
6,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TOLEDO
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO (sch) / TOLEDO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (WB) - YES / NO (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED ISLAND / DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Ridge Route 2024-94 This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.6 mph and 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 35 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:55 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
50 0 0.0% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.7%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.7%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 94.7%
45 X X X X X X 6 3.9% 91.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.6% 87.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.2% 80.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 64.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 55.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 47.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2% 38.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 29.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 21.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 15.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 21.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 15.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 9.2%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 5.3%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 152
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.2 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-94

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:55 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.3%
49 X 99.3%
48 X 98.7%
47 X 96.7%
46 X 94.7%
45 X 91.4%
44 X 87.5% }PACE
43 X 80.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 73.7% }PACE
41 X 64.5% }PACE
40 X 55.9% }PACE
39 X 47.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 38.8% }PACE
HCI
38 X 38.8% }PACE
37 X 29.6% }PACE
36 X 21.1% }PACE
35 X 15.1% }PACE
34 X 9.2% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 5.3%
32 X 2.0%
31 X 0.7%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.2 %
Ridge Route 2024-94

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANI / TRABUCO
5,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANI / TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO (sch) / SERRANO (sch) / TRABUCO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

PAINTED BIKE LANES / UNMARKED BUS STOP

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & PAINTED ISLAND & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / HIGH SCHOOL / ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDS & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Ridge Route 2024-95 This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting), an elementary school and high school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 42.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 98.6%
X X 2 1.4% 97.2%
X 1 0.7% 95.7%
X X X 3 2.1% 95.0%
45 X X X X 4 2.8% 92.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 90.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 87.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.8% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.8% 75.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.2% 67.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.2% 58.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.9% 48.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 39.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 33.3%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 24.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 33.3%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 24.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.1% 19.1%
X X X X X 5 3.5% 12.1%
X X X 3 2.1% 8.5%
X X X X 4 2.8% 6.4%
30 X X X 3 2.1% 3.5%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 141
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-95

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.6%
48 X 97.2%
47 X 95.7%
46 X 95.0%
45 X 92.9%
44 X 90.1%
43 X 87.9% }PACE
42 X 83.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 75.2% }PACE
40 X 67.4% }PACE
39 X 58.2% }PACE
38 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 39.0% }PACE
36 X 33.3% }PACE
35 X 24.8% }PACE
34 X 19.1% }PACE
33 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.5%
31 X 6.4%
30 X 3.5%
29 X 1.4%
28 X 0.7%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
Ridge Route 2024-95

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIMHURST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO RIMGATE DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF TRABUCO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - TRABUCO / RIMGATE

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING 2nd & 4th THURS 10am-2pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - YES / YES (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE (Skip Line)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK (at Rimgate) / PED TRAIL (NB) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rimhurst 2024-96 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.52 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIMHURST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO RIMGATE DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.6% 99.1%
X X 2 1.7% 96.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 94.8%
X X X X 4 3.5% 89.6%
30 X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 72.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 63.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.2% 54.8%
25 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 42.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 33.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 24.3%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 16.5%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 10.4%
20 X X 2 1.7% 6.1%
X X X 3 2.6% 4.3%
X X 2 1.7% 1.7%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.1 %
File: Rimhurst 2024-96

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIMHURST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO RIMGATE DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 96.5%
32 X 94.8%
31 X 89.6%
30 X 86.1% }PACE
29 X 80.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 72.2% }PACE
27 X 63.5% }PACE
26 X 54.8% }PACE
25 X 42.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
24 X 33.9% }PACE
23 X 24.3% }PACE
22 X 16.5% }PACE
21 X 10.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 6.1%
19 X 4.3%
18 X 1.7%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.1 %
Rimhurst 2024-96

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF CENTER

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CENTER / LAKE FOREST
15,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CENTER / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT CENTER / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

SHORT DISTANCE BTWN INTERSECTIONS

TRAFFIC BACKS UP AT INTERSECTIONS - SURVEYED ON GREEN LIGHTS ONLY ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (Dense) / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Rockfield 2024-97
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are dense commercial and business. Field notes include short distances between intersection, no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 43.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.25 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
50 0 0.0% 98.4%
X X 2 1.6% 98.4%
X 1 0.8% 96.8%
X X 2 1.6% 96.0%
X X 2 1.6% 94.4%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 92.7%
X X X 3 2.4% 86.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.1% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 75.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 69.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12.9% 62.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.1% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.5% 37.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.7% 27.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.3% 17.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.3% 17.7%
35 X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 10.5%
0 0.0% 4.8%
X X X 3 2.4% 4.8%
X 1 0.8% 2.4%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
30 0 0.0% 0.8%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 124
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.5 %
File: Rockfield 2024-97

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.2%
50 X 98.4%
49 X 98.4%
48 X 96.8%
47 X 96.0%
46 X 94.4%
45 X 92.7% }PACE
44 X 86.3% }PACE
43 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 75.8% }PACE
41 X 69.4% }PACE
40 X 62.9% }PACE
39 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 37.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 37.9% }PACE
37 X 27.4% }PACE
36 X 17.7% }PACE
35 X 10.5% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 4.8%
33 X 4.8%
32 X 2.4%
31 X 1.6%
30 X 0.8%
29 X 0.8%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.5 %
Rockfield 2024-97

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MERCY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 45.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (SB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.13
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 14 2.80 0.89

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
20,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE GRADUL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
WIDE ROAD (Lake Forest to Mercury-SB)

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rockfield 2024-98
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial. Field notes include no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph and 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 40 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.43 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.1%
X X X 3 1.9% 97.5%
X X X 3 1.9% 95.7%
50 X X X X 4 2.5% 93.8%
0 0.0% 91.4%
X X 2 1.2% 91.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 90.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.7% 85.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.4% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 74.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 69.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.2% 62.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.6% 56.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 47.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 38.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.0% 29.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 21.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 14.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 14.2%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 8.6%
X X X 3 1.9% 3.7%
X X 2 1.2% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 162
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.6 %
File: Rockfield 2024-98

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.1%
52 X 97.5%
51 X 95.7%
50 X 93.8%
49 X 91.4%
48 X 91.4%
47 X 90.1%
46 X 85.8%
45 X 82.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
44 X 74.7% }PACE
43 X 69.1% }PACE
42 X 62.3% }PACE
41 X 56.2% }PACE
40 X 47.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 38.3% }PACE
38 X 29.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 29.0% }PACE
37 X 21.0% }PACE
36 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.6%
34 X 3.7%
33 X 1.9%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.6 %
Rockfield 2024-98

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO CAVANAUGH RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF RIDGE ROUTE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (SB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.49

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / DUNE MEAR (sch)
15,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / DUNE MEAR (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Ridge Route) / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rockfield 2024-99
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO CAVANAUGH RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.0%
50 X X X X 4 2.7% 96.0%
X X 2 1.3% 93.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 92.0%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 88.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 84.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.0% 79.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.3% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 52.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.7% 46.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.0% 35.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 27.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 20.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 13.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 8.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 8.7%
35 X X X X 4 2.7% 4.0%
0 0.0% 1.3%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 150
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
File: Rockfield 2024-99

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO CAVANAUGH RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.3%
51 X 98.0%
50 X 96.0%
49 X 93.3%
48 X 92.0%
47 X 88.0%
46 X 84.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 79.3% }PACE
44 X 71.3% }PACE
43 X 64.0% }PACE
42 X 52.7% }PACE
41 X 46.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 35.3% }PACE
39 X 27.3% }PACE
38 X 20.7% }PACE
HCI
38 X 20.7% }PACE
37 X 13.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
36 X 8.7%
35 X 4.0%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 1.3%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
Rockfield 2024-99

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD CAVANAUGH RD TO SILVERBAY DR
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO & NORTH OF SILVERBAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 40.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.08
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.16
TOTAL COLLISIONS 15 3.00 1.23

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
17,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HARVEST / EL TORO / ORCHARD

CROSSWALKS AT HARVEST / EL TORO / ORCHARD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

VEHICLES BACK UP AT EL TORO & ORCHARD SIGNALS / BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (Many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / RAISED MEDIAN ISLANDE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL - RETAIL STORES (Dense) / RESTUARANTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Rockfield 2024-100
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 0.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD CAVANAUGH RD TO SILVERBAY DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
45 X X X X 4 2.2% 97.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 95.5%
X X X X 4 2.2% 92.2%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 89.9%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 86.0%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 82.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 78.2%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.3% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 62.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 62.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.1% 56.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.3% 46.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 39.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.5% 33.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 24.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 17.3%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 10.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 7.3%
X X X 3 1.7% 2.2%
0 0.0% 0.6%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 30.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.6 %
File: Rockfield 2024-100

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD CAVANAUGH RD TO SILVERBAY DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.4%
46 X 98.9%
45 X 97.8%
44 X 95.5%
43 X 92.2%
42 X 89.9%
41 X 86.0%
40 X 82.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
39 X 78.2% }PACE
38 X 73.7% }PACE
HCI
38 X 73.7% }PACE
37 X 69.8% }PACE
36 X 62.6% }PACE
35 X 56.4% }PACE
34 X 46.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 39.1% }PACE
32 X 33.5% }PACE
31 X 24.0% }PACE
30 X 17.3% }PACE
29 X 10.6% - - - - - -15PCT
28 X 7.3%
27 X 2.2%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 30.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.6 %
Rockfield 2024-100

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD SILVERBAY DR TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LANDVIEW

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 5 1.00 0.45
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.09
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.18
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 19 3.80 1.73

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
14,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LANDVIEW / LOS ALISOS
CROSSWALKS AT LANDVIEW (sch) / LOS ALISOS (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

NARROW PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rockfield 2024-101
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 3.5 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.41 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD SILVERBAY DR TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.3%
50 X X X X 4 2.8% 99.3%
X X 2 1.4% 96.6%
X X 2 1.4% 95.2%
X X 2 1.4% 93.8%
X X X 3 2.1% 92.4%
45 X X X X X 5 3.4% 90.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 86.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 77.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 67.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3% 60.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 52.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 43.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 34.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 24.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 24.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 13.8%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 7.6%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 4.1%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 145
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.6 %
File: Rockfield 2024-101

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD SILVERBAY DR TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.3%
50 X 99.3%
49 X 96.6%
48 X 95.2%
47 X 93.8%
46 X 92.4%
45 X 90.3%
44 X 86.9% }PACE
43 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 77.2% }PACE
41 X 67.6% }PACE
40 X 60.7% }PACE
39 X 52.4% }PACE
38 X 43.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 43.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 34.5% }PACE
36 X 24.1% }PACE
35 X 13.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 7.6%
33 X 4.1%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.6 %
Rockfield 2024-101

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE FORTUNA BAKE PKWY TO RUE DE VALORE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MONTAUBAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Bake to Fascia) - 1 LANE (Fascia to Rue De Valore) 1,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Bake to Fascia) - 1 LANE (Fascia to Rue De Valore)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE (sch) / FASCIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / LIBRARY (at Bake)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Rue De Fortuna 2024-102 The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.74 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE FORTUNA BAKE PKWY TO RUE DE VALORE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X X 2 1.6% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.1% 96.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 93.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 89.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 79.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 70.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 64.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 58.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 64.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 58.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 48.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 40.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 33.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 26.0%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 18.9%
X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 14.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 8.7%
X X X 3 2.4% 5.5%
X X X 3 2.4% 3.1%
25 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 127
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
File: Rue De Fortuna 2024-102

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE FORTUNA BAKE PKWY TO RUE DE VALORE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 98.4%
42 X 96.9%
41 X 93.7%
40 X 89.0%
39 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.5% }PACE
HCI
38 X 79.5% }PACE
37 X 70.9% }PACE
36 X 64.6% }PACE
35 X 58.3% }PACE
34 X 48.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 40.2% }PACE
32 X 33.9% }PACE
31 X 26.0% }PACE
30 X 18.9% }PACE
29 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 8.7%
27 X 5.5%
26 X 3.1%
25 X 0.8%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
Rue De Fortuna 2024-102

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE VALORE LAKE FOREST DR TO RUE DE FORTUNA
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MONTAUBAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Lake Forest to Argento) - 1 LANE (Argento to Rue De Fortuna) 4,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Lake Forest to Argento) - 1 LANE (Argento to Rue De Fortuna)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CHURCH (at Lake Forest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rue De Valore 2024-103
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.73 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE VALORE LAKE FOREST DR TO RUE DE FORTUNA
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.3% 97.5%
40 X X X X 4 3.3% 94.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.9% 91.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.9% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 81.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 73.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 67.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 73.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 59.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.8% 49.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 39.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 32.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 26.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 18.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.9% 13.1%
X X X X 4 3.3% 8.2%
X X X X 4 3.3% 4.9%
25 X X 2 1.6% 1.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 122
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.1 %
File: Rue De Valore 2024-103

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE VALORE LAKE FOREST DR TO RUE DE FORTUNA
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 98.4%
41 X 97.5%
40 X 94.3%
39 X 91.0%
38 X 86.1% }PACE
HCI
38 X 86.1% }PACE
37 X 81.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 73.8% }PACE
35 X 67.2% }PACE
34 X 59.8% }PACE
33 X 49.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 39.3% }PACE
31 X 32.8% }PACE
30 X 26.2% }PACE
29 X 18.9% }PACE
28 X 13.1% - - - - - -15PCT
27 X 8.2%
26 X 4.9%
25 X 1.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.1 %
Rue De Valore 2024-103

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO MILLWOOD RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SADDLEBACK RANCH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (NB)
15 MPH (Advisory at Curves)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GLENN RANCH
13,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GLENN RANCH

CROSSWALKS AT GLEN RANCH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL GRADES (NB)

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Glen Ranch approach)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCED
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-104
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) with a school nearby. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 37 to 46 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.20 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO MILLWOOD RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 98.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 93.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.9% 88.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 79.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.8% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 58.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.8% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 58.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 49.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.9% 39.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 30.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 22.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 10.8%
35 X X X X X 5 3.2% 5.7%
X X X 3 1.9% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 158
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-104

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO MILLWOOD RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 98.1%
46 X 93.7% }PACE
45 X 88.6% }PACE
44 X 79.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 69.6% }PACE
HCI
43 X 69.6% }PACE
42 X 58.9% }PACE
41 X 49.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 39.2% }PACE
39 X 30.4% }PACE
38 X 22.2% }PACE
37 X 17.1% }PACE
36 X 10.8% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 5.7%
34 X 2.5%
33 X 0.6%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
Saddleback Ranch 2024-104

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD MILLWOOD RD TO PENDLETON RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MALABAR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK - RRFB (SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - FAWN RIDGE
CROSSWALKS AT FAWN RIDGE (sch)
9,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT FAWN RIDGE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO - (Except 7am-4pm, MON-FRI, Front of School)

OTHER NO PARKING & NO STOPPING ANYTIME / PAINTED BIKES LANES CUT OUT SECTION FOR SCHOOL DROP-OFF AND PICKUPS (NB) at School

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT DOWNHILL GRADE (SB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (NB) - YES / NO (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND and PAINTED ISLAND

AREAS OF RED CURB

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PORTOLA HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-105 This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and an elementary school. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, slight to gradual horizontal and vertical curves, areas of limited sight distance and no stopping any time except in front of the school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 44.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD MILLWOOD RD TO PENDLETON RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X X X X 4 2.5% 98.1%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 95.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 92.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.1% 82.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.9% 73.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.2% 64.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.9% 73.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.2% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 52.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 43.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 34.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 26.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 19.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 13.0%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 8.7%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 5.6%
X X X 3 1.9% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 161
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.0 %
File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-105

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD MILLWOOD RD TO PENDLETON RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.4%
48 X 98.1%
47 X 95.7%
46 X 92.5% }PACE
45 X 87.6% }PACE
44 X 82.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 73.9% }PACE
HCI
43 X 73.9% }PACE
42 X 64.0% }PACE
41 X 52.8% }PACE
40 X 43.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 34.2% }PACE
38 X 26.7% }PACE
37 X 19.9% }PACE
36 X 13.0% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.7%
34 X 5.6%
33 X 2.5%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.0 %
Saddleback Ranch 2024-105

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD PENDLETON RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CEDAR RIDGE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH
25 MPH (Advisory at Alder)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RIDGELINE / RANCHWOOD
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGELINE (sch) / RANCHWOOD (sch)
3,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGELINE (sch) / RANCHWOOD (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (Heavy Parking at Club House & Park) OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of)
PAINTED BIKE LANES / BIKES SHARE THE ROAD LEGEND (n/o Ranchwood)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE CONSTANT GRADUAL-MODERATE UPHILL GRADE (NB) HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND /2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CLUB HOUSE-PICKLE BALL-POOL / GOLF COURSE PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDS & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-106 This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting), club house pool and pickleball courts and elementary school at Pendleton Road. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, gradual to constant horizontal and vertical curves, and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 37.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.54 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD PENDLETON RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.6% 94.6%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 90.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 81.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 74.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 67.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 58.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 51.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.7% 44.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 36.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 28.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 21.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 13.1%
X X X X 4 3.1% 6.9%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.8%
25 X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 130
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.9 %
File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-106

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD PENDLETON RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 97.7%
40 X 94.6%
39 X 90.0%
38 X 86.2%
37 X 81.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 74.6% }PACE
35 X 67.7% }PACE
34 X 58.5% }PACE
33 X 51.5% }PACE
32 X 44.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 36.9% }PACE
30 X 28.5% }PACE
29 X 21.5% }PACE
28 X 13.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 6.9%
26 X 3.8%
25 X 1.5%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.9 %
Saddleback Ranch 2024-106

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SCL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.20
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.55

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES(SB) - 4 LANES (NB)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO
38,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / TRABUCO HILLS HIGH SCHOOL (in Mission Viejo at city limit) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Santa Margarita 2024-107
This segment of Santa Margarita Parkway has three (3) to four (4) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school at the south City limit in the City of Mission Viejo. Field observations include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, bike lane and no stopping any time. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 51.2 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.21 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X X 2 1.4% 98.6%
55 X X X 3 2.0% 97.3%
X X X X 4 2.7% 95.3%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 92.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 89.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 83.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 77.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 70.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.8% 62.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.8% 53.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 44.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 37.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 29.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 22.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 16.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 22.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 16.9%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 12.2%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.1% 8.8%
X X X 3 2.0% 4.7%
X X 2 1.4% 2.7%
X X 2 1.4% 1.4%

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 148
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
File: Santa Margarita 2024-107

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 99.3%
56 X 98.6%
55 X 97.3%
54 X 95.3%
53 X 92.6%
52 X 89.2% }PACE
51 X 83.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 77.0% }PACE
49 X 70.3% }PACE
48 X 62.2% }PACE
47 X 53.4% }PACE
46 X 44.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 37.2% }PACE
44 X 29.7% }PACE
43 X 22.3% }PACE
HCI
44 X 29.7% }PACE
43 X 22.3% }PACE
42 X 16.9%
41 X 12.2% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 8.8%
39 X 4.7%
38 X 2.7%
37 X 1.4%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
Santa Margarita 2024-107

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD RIDGELINE RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (Gertner) DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SADDLE CREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 59.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 49 - 58 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 66.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.26
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.09
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.09
TOTAL COLLISIONS 12 2.40 1.04

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS NONE

CROSSWALKS NONE
7,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS
BIKE LANES / BIKES SHERE ROAD (Areas of)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / YES

STREET LIGHTING NO

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NARROW ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / OPEN UNDEVELOPED LAND RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Santiago Cyn 2024-108
This segment of Santiago Canyon Road is a rural two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial at Live Oak Canyon Road and open undeveloped land. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph.

A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.

0.87 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD RIDGELINE RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (Gertner) DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
65 X X X 3 1.3% 99.2%
X X X 3 1.3% 97.9%
X X X X X X 6 2.5% 96.6%
X X X X X 5 2.1% 94.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.0% 91.9%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.7% 89.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.8% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.7% 80.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.9% 75.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.4% 69.9%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.4% 63.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 57.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.1% 42.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.8% 34.7%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 28.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.2% 13.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.2% 9.3%
X X X X X X X 7 3.0% 5.1%
45 X X X 3 1.3% 2.1%
X X 2 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

0.0%

0.0%
40 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 236
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 66.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.6 %
File: Santiago Cyn 2024-108

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD RIDGELINE RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (Gertner) DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 99.6%
65 X 99.2%
64 X 97.9%
63 X 96.6%
62 X 94.1%
61 X 91.9%
60 X 89.0%
59 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
58 X 80.5% }PACE
57 X 75.8% }PACE
56 X 69.9% }PACE
55 X 63.6% }PACE
54 X 57.2% }PACE
53 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
52 X 42.8% }PACE
51 X 34.7% }PACE
50 X 28.0% }PACE
49 X 20.8% }PACE
48 X 13.6% - - - - - -15PCT
47 X 9.3%
46 X 5.1%
45 X 2.1%
44 X 0.8%
43 X 0.0%
HCI
44 X 0.8%
43 X 0.0%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 66.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.6 %
Santiago Cyn 2024-108

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SHASTA LAKE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH
30 MPH & 35 MPH (Advisory at curves)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.40
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.20
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 1.61

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO WAY / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO WAY ((sch) / WINDING WAY (sch) / LAKE FOREST (sch) 3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO WAY ((sch) / WINDING WAY (sch) / LAKE FOREST (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING & NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of)

BIKES MAY USE FULL LANE / NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)

AREAS OF RED CURB

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SERRANO CREEK PARK / SCHOOL / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Serrano 2024-109 This segment of Serrano Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), Serrano Creek park, an elementary school, and business at Lake Forest Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 41.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) collisions involved in a serious injury, and one involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
0 0.0% 98.4%
0 0.0% 98.4%
45 X 1 0.8% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 88.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 81.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.9% 65.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.9% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 44.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 35.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 35.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 10.9%
X X X X 4 3.1% 4.7%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
File: Serrano 2024-109

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.2%
48 X 99.2%
47 X 98.4%
46 X 98.4%
45 X 98.4%
44 X 97.7%
43 X 94.6% }PACE
42 X 88.4% }PACE
41 X 81.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
40 X 75.2% }PACE
39 X 65.9% }PACE
38 X 55.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 55.0% }PACE
37 X 44.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 35.7% }PACE
35 X 25.6% }PACE
34 X 17.1% }PACE
33 X 10.9% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 4.7%
31 X 1.6%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
Serrano 2024-109

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MOHAWK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH
30 MPH (Advisory at curves)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.37
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.37
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 2.23

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)
3,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO (NB) - YES (SB)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME & NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / PAINTED ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK / SCHOOL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Serrano 2024-110 This segment of Serrano Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 38.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved in a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.41 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X X X 3 2.3% 99.2%
X X X 3 2.3% 97.0%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 94.7%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 90.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.1% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.6% 79.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.6% 72.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12.1% 64.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.4% 52.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.4% 52.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 40.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.8% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 24.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 17.4%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.5% 12.1%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 7.6%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.8%
X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 132
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
File: Serrano 2024-110

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 99.2%
42 X 97.0%
41 X 94.7%
40 X 90.9% }PACE
39 X 85.6% }PACE
38 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 72.0% }PACE
36 X 64.4% }PACE
35 X 52.3% }PACE
34 X 40.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 34.1% }PACE
32 X 24.2% }PACE
31 X 17.4% }PACE
30 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.6%
28 X 3.8%
27 X 1.5%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
Serrano 2024-110

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SILVER SPUR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.30
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.30
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.30
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 2 0.40 0.59

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / EL TORO
4,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

AREAS OF RED CURB / NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /HIGH SCHOOL / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Serrano 2024-111 This segment of Serrano Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), high school and business at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 39.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
0 0.0% 99.4%
45 X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.2%
X X 2 1.2% 97.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 96.4%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 92.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.4% 82.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.5% 63.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.7% 53.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.5% 63.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.7% 53.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 42.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 35.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 27.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.4% 20.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 15.5%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 11.3%
X X X X 4 2.4% 8.3%
X X X X 4 2.4% 6.0%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 3.6%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 168
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
File: Serrano 2024-111

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.4%
46 X 99.4%
45 X 99.4%
44 X 98.2%
43 X 97.6%
42 X 96.4%
41 X 92.9%
40 X 89.9% }PACE
39 X 82.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 77.4% }PACE
HCI
38 X 77.4% }PACE
37 X 69.6% }PACE
36 X 63.1% }PACE
35 X 53.6% }PACE
34 X 42.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 35.1% }PACE
32 X 27.4% }PACE
31 X 20.8% }PACE
30 X 15.5%
29 X 11.3% - - - - - -15PCT
28 X 8.3%
27 X 6.0%
26 X 3.6%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
Serrano 2024-111

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF COMMERCENTRE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.8 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Round-a-bout) 1,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Round-a-bout)

CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / OLYMPUS

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / CLUB HOUSE / POOL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Serrano Summit 2024-112
This segment of Serrano Summit Drive is a two-lay roadway. The adjacent land uses are club house, community pool, residential (non-fronting) and commercial. Field notes state the roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 39.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 31 to 40 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.

0.26 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 2.7% 95.6%
X X X 3 2.7% 92.9%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 90.3%
40 X X X X X X X 7 6.2% 85.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 63.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 55.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 47.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 37.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.2% 29.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 14.2%
30 X X X X 4 3.5% 7.1%
X X 2 1.8% 3.5%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 113
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.1 %
File: Serrano Summit 2024-112

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.1%
44 X 97.3%
43 X 95.6%
HCI
43 X 95.6%
42 X 92.9%
41 X 90.3%
40 X 85.8% }PACE
39 X 79.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 74.3% }PACE
37 X 63.7% }PACE
36 X 55.8% }PACE
35 X 47.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 37.2% }PACE
33 X 29.2% }PACE
32 X 23.0% }PACE
31 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
30 X 7.1%
29 X 3.5%
28 X 1.8%
27 X 0.9%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.1 %
File:Serrano Summit 2024-112

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TAMERISK PEACHWOOD (S) TO PEACHWOOD (N)
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:30 AM - 9:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF VISTA HERMOSA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
25 MPH & 30 MPH Advisory

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PEACHWOOD (S) / PEACHWOOD (N)

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD (N)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVE & SWEEPING "C" CURVES (meets Peachwood at both ends) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO CENTERLINE STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK / COMMINITY POOL-TENNIS COURTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Tamarisk 2024-113
This segment of Tamerisk is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting). Field notes state that the roadway has gradual to sweeping horizontal curves. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 29.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 23 to 32 mph, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TAMERISK PEACHWOOD (S) TO PEACHWOOD (N)
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:30 AM - 9:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
35 100.0%
X X 2 2.0% 100.0%
X X 2 2.0% 98.0%
X X X X 4 4.0% 96.0%
X X X X X X 6 6.1% 91.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12.1% 85.9%
X X X X X X X 7 7.1% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 8.1% 66.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 13.1% 58.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11.1% 45.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11.1% 34.3%
X X X X X 5 5.1% 23.2%
X X X X 4 4.0% 18.2%
X X X X 4 4.0% 14.1%
X X X 3 3.0% 10.1%
20 X X 2 2.0% 7.1%
X X 2 2.0% 5.1%
X X 2 2.0% 3.0%
0 0.0% 1.0%
X 1 1.0% 1.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 99
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.1 %
File: Tamarisk 2024-113

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TAMERISK PEACHWOOD (S) TO PEACHWOOD (N)
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:30 AM - 9:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 98.0%
32 X 96.0% }PACE
31 X 91.9% }PACE
30 X 85.9% }PACE
29 X 73.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 66.7% }PACE
27 X 58.6% }PACE
26 X 45.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 34.3% }PACE
24 X 23.2% }PACE
23 X 18.2% }PACE
22 X 14.1% - - - - - -15PCT
21 X 10.1%
20 X 7.1%
19 X 5.1%
18 X 3.0%
17 X 1.0%
16 X 1.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.1 %
Tamarisk 2024-113

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO LANE BAKE LANE TO CUL-DE-SAC
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SUPERIOR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 19 - 28 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 86.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH Advisory (at North end)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - TOLEDO ENTRANCE (N) / TOLEDO ENTRANCE (S)

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE (Except Bend at Bake Lane)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Toledo Ln 2024-114 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.61 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO LANE BAKE LANE TO CUL-DE-SAC
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.7% 99.1%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 97.4%
X X X X 4 3.5% 94.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 91.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 85.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 78.3%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.2% 67.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 55.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 47.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 36.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 27.8%
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 20.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 10.4%
X X X 3 2.6% 5.2%
X X 2 1.7% 2.6%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 19 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
File: Toledo Ln 2024-114

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO LANE BAKE LANE TO CUL-DE-SAC
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 99.1%
30 X 97.4%
29 X 94.8%
28 X 91.3% }PACE
27 X 85.2% }PACE
26 X 78.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
25 X 67.8% }PACE
24 X 55.7% }PACE
23 X 47.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 36.5% }PACE
21 X 27.8% }PACE
20 X 20.0% }PACE
19 X 10.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
18 X 5.2%
17 X 2.6%
16 X 0.9%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 19 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
Toledo Ln 2024-114

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
4,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / SERRANO / BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / SERRANO (sch) / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / TENNIS CLUB
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Toledo Wy 2024-115
This segment of Toledo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a tennis club. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 48.7 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 41 to 50 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.78 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 99.2%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 96.6%
50 X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 92.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.1% 86.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 81.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.0% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.3% 62.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 53.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.8% 44.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.2% 38.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 28.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 20.3%
40 X X X X X X 6 5.1% 14.4%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 9.3%
X X X 3 2.5% 5.1%
X X 2 1.7% 2.5%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
35 0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 118
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
File: Toledo Wy 2024-115

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.2%
51 X 96.6%
50 X 92.4% }PACE
49 X 86.4% }PACE
48 X 81.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 73.7% }PACE
46 X 62.7% }PACE
45 X 53.4% }PACE
44 X 44.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 38.1% }PACE
42 X 28.0% }PACE
41 X 20.3% }PACE
40 X 14.4% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 9.3%
38 X 5.1%
HCI
38 X 5.1%
37 X 2.5%
36 X 0.8%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
Toledo Wy 2024-115

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF TIMBERLAND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.24
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.71

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
4,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-MODERATE UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Toledo Wy 2024-116 The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.1%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 97.4%
X X X X 4 2.6% 94.2%
50 X X X X X 5 3.2% 91.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 88.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 70.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.3% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 51.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 42.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 27.1%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 20.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 15.5%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 10.3%
X X X X 4 2.6% 7.1%
X X 2 1.3% 4.5%
35 X X X 3 1.9% 3.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.3% 4.5%
35 X X X 3 1.9% 3.2%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 155
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
File: Toledo Wy 2024-116

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.1%
52 X 97.4%
51 X 94.2%
50 X 91.6%
49 X 88.4%
48 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 77.4% }PACE
46 X 70.3% }PACE
45 X 61.3% }PACE
44 X 51.0% }PACE
43 X 42.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 35.5% }PACE
41 X 27.1% }PACE
40 X 20.6% }PACE
39 X 15.5% }PACE
38 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 7.1%
36 X 4.5%
35 X 3.2%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
Toledo Wy 2024-116

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 45.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.23
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 5 1.00 1.17

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch)/ EL TORO
5,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch)/ EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLCOCK

ARES OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / HIGH SCHOOL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Toledo Wy 2024-117 This segment of Toledo Way is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field observations include school age pedestrians. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 45.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.45 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 99.2%
X X X X X 5 4.0% 97.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 93.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 88.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 81.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 73.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 65.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 57.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 50.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 27.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 19.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 13.5%
35 X X X X 4 3.2% 8.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X 4 3.2% 8.7%
X X 2 1.6% 5.6%
X X X 3 2.4% 4.0%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 126
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
File: Toledo Wy 2024-117

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.2%
48 X 97.6%
47 X 93.7%
46 X 88.1% }PACE
45 X 81.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
44 X 73.8% }PACE
43 X 65.9% }PACE
42 X 57.1% }PACE
41 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 42.1% }PACE
39 X 34.1% }PACE
38 X 27.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 27.0% }PACE
37 X 19.8% }PACE
36 X 13.5% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.7%
34 X 5.6%
33 X 4.0%
32 X 1.6%
31 X 0.8%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
Toledo Wy 2024-117

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY (W) TO ALTON PKWY (E)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COOK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON (WEST) / ALTON (EAST)
3,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON (WEST) / ALTON (EAST)

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON (WEST) / ALTON (EAST)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLANE / PAINTED ISLAND

TOWNE CENTER MEETS ALTON PKWY (WEST) AND (EAST)

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Towne Ctr 2024-118
This segment of Towne Centre Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial and a small section of residential (non-fronting). With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.78 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY (W) TO ALTON PKWY (E)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
50 X X 2 1.4% 97.8%
X 1 0.7% 96.4%
X X X 3 2.2% 95.7%
X X X X 4 2.9% 93.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 90.6%
45 X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.7% 80.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 71.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 63.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 71.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.1% 58.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 47.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 41.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 34.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 28.3%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 21.0%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 15.9%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 10.1%
X X X X 4 2.9% 6.5%
X X 2 1.4% 3.6%
X X 2 1.4% 2.2%
30 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 138
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
File: Towne Ctr 2024-118

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY (W) TO ALTON PKWY (E)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.3%
50 X 97.8%
49 X 96.4%
48 X 95.7%
47 X 93.5%
46 X 90.6%
45 X 85.5%
44 X 80.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 71.7% }PACE
HCI
43 X 71.7% }PACE
42 X 63.8% }PACE
41 X 58.0% }PACE
40 X 47.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 41.3% }PACE
38 X 34.8% }PACE
37 X 28.3% }PACE
36 X 21.0% }PACE
35 X 15.9% }PACE
34 X 10.1% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 6.5%
32 X 3.6%
31 X 2.2%
30 X 0.7%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
Towne Ctr 2024-118

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ALTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
8,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / MARKET PL / ENTERTAINMENT / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / MARKET PL / ENTERTAINMENT / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

NO SHOULDERS / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE
ADJACENT LAND USE SHOPPING CENTERS (Dense) / ELECTIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Towne Ctr 2024-119
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
45 X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.5%
0 0.0% 98.5%
X 1 0.7% 98.5%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 97.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.1% 93.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.9% 85.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.1% 79.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.6% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 61.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.2% 55.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 61.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.2% 55.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.1% 41.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 33.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.3% 29.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 19.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.3% 14.0%
X X X X 4 2.9% 3.7%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 136
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
File: Towne Ctr 2024-119

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.3%
44 X 98.5%
43 X 98.5%
42 X 98.5%
41 X 97.8%
40 X 93.4%
39 X 85.3% }PACE
38 X 79.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 79.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 71.3% }PACE
36 X 61.8% }PACE
35 X 55.1% }PACE
34 X 41.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 33.8% }PACE
32 X 29.4% }PACE
31 X 19.1% }PACE
30 X 14.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 3.7%
28 X 0.7%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
Towne Ctr 2024-119

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ALTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH (NB)
15 MPH (Advisory at Curves)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.29
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 2.32

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / LAKE FOREST / PORTOLA

CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / LAKE FOREST / PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

NO SHOULDERS / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES (s/o Bake)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (SB) - YES / NO (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERIAL / RESIDENTIAL (Multi-Family-NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SOUTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Towne Ctr 2024-120
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 35 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.

0.59 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.9% 98.6%
X X X X 4 2.9% 95.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 92.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.9% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.2% 73.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 61.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 15.1% 54.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 15.1% 54.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.8% 38.8%
X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 28.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 23.0%
X X 2 1.4% 15.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 14.4%
X X X 3 2.2% 7.9%
X X X X 4 2.9% 5.8%
X X 2 1.4% 2.9%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
25 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 139
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
File: Towne Ctr 2024-120

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 98.6%
41 X 95.7% }PACE
40 X 92.8% }PACE
39 X 85.6% }PACE
38 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 73.4% }PACE
36 X 61.2% }PACE
35 X 54.0% }PACE
34 X 38.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 28.1% }PACE
32 X 23.0% }PACE
31 X 15.8%
30 X 14.4% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.9%
28 X 5.8%
27 X 2.9%
26 X 1.4%
25 X 0.7%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
Towne Ctr 2024-120

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO PEACHWOOD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PASEO SOMBRE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 60.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.08
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.11

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PEACHWOOD / VIA DEL RIO / PASEO TRANQUILLO / PASEO SOMBRA

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / VIA DEL RIO / PASEO TRANQUILLO / PASEO SOMBRA 17,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / VIA DEL RIO / PASEO TRANQUILLO / PASEO SOMBRA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (at Bake) / CHURCH / CEMETERY RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Trabuco 2024-121
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, church and cemetery. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO PEACHWOOD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
0 0.0% 98.9%
0 0.0% 98.9%
0 0.0% 98.9%
0 0.0% 98.9%
65 X 1 0.6% 98.9%
X 1 0.6% 98.3%
X 1 0.6% 97.8%
X 1 0.6% 97.2%
X X 2 1.1% 96.6%
60 X X X X X X 6 3.4% 95.5%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 92.2%
X 1 0.6% 89.4%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 88.8%
X X X X 4 2.2% 86.0%
55 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 83.8%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 78.8%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 76.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 72.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 67.6%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.4% 63.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 54.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 48.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.1% 44.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 34.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.5% 29.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 19.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 15.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 12.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 2.8% 15.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 12.3%
X X 2 1.1% 8.4%
40 X X X X 4 2.2% 7.3%
X 1 0.6% 5.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 4.5%
X 1 0.6% 2.8%
X 1 0.6% 2.2%
35 X 1 0.6% 1.7%
0 0.0% 1.1%
X 1 0.6% 1.1%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 60.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
File: Trabuco 2024-121

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO PEACHWOOD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 98.9%
68 X 98.9%
67 X 98.9%
66 X 98.9%
65 X 98.9%
64 X 98.3%
63 X 97.8%
62 X 97.2%
61 X 96.6%
60 X 95.5%
59 X 92.2%
58 X 89.4%
57 X 88.8%
56 X 86.0%
55 X 83.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 78.8%
53 X 76.0% }PACE
52 X 72.1% }PACE
51 X 67.6% }PACE
50 X 63.1% }PACE
49 X 54.7% }PACE
48 X 48.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 44.7% }PACE
46 X 34.6% }PACE
45 X 29.1% }PACE
44 X 19.6% }PACE
43 X 15.1%
HCI
43 X 15.1%
42 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
41 X 8.4%
40 X 7.3%
39 X 5.0%
38 X 4.5%
37 X 2.8%
36 X 2.2%
35 X 1.7%
34 X 1.1%
33 X 1.1%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 60.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
Trabuco 2024-121

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD PEACHWOOD TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LAKE FOREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.03
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 3 0.60 0.09
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 8 1.60 0.24
.

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PEACHWOOD / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / LAKE FOREST
21,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Trabuco 2024-122
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD PEACHWOOD TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.2% 99.5%
55 X X X X X X 6 3.2% 97.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.9% 94.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.5% 89.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.6% 82.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.3% 74.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.6% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.7% 55.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.4% 45.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.1% 27.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4% 18.9%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 13.5%
X X X X X X X 7 3.8% 10.8%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 7.0%
X X X X 4 2.2% 4.3%
40 X X X 3 1.6% 2.2%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 185
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
File: Trabuco 2024-122

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD PEACHWOOD TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.5%
55 X 97.3%
54 X 94.1% }PACE
53 X 89.2% }PACE
52 X 82.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 74.1% }PACE
50 X 63.8% }PACE
49 X 55.1% }PACE
48 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 34.1% }PACE
46 X 27.0% }PACE
45 X 18.9% }PACE
44 X 13.5% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 10.8%
42 X 7.0%
41 X 4.3%
40 X 2.2%
39 X 0.5%
38 X 0.0%
HCI
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
Trabuco 2024-122

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF RIDGE ROUTE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2 0.40 0.11
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 18 3.60 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
27,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL-GAS STATION / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Trabuco 2024-123
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane arterial. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business.

The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.2 mph and 10 mph pace range of 42 to 51 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
55 X X X 3 1.3% 99.6%
X X 2 0.9% 98.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 97.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.3% 90.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.3% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 9.9% 77.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.2% 67.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.5% 60.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 52.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.6% 45.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.5% 37.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.3% 29.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.8% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.9% 17.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 12.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.1% 8.1%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 4.9%
X X X 3 1.3% 2.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.4% 0.9%
35 X 1 0.4% 0.4%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 223
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 45.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.0 %
File: Trabuco 2024-123

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.6%
54 X 98.2%
53 X 97.3%
52 X 94.6%
51 X 90.1% }PACE
50 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 77.6% }PACE
48 X 67.7% }PACE
47 X 60.5% }PACE
46 X 52.0% }PACE
45 X 45.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
44 X 37.7% }PACE
43 X 29.1% }PACE
42 X 22.9% }PACE
41 X 17.0%
40 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 8.1%
38 X 4.9%
HCI
38 X 4.9%
37 X 2.2%
36 X 0.9%
35 X 0.4%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 45.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.0 %
Trabuco 2024-123

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF EL TORO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.10
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.10
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 1.05

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO

CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
26,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Entire Block)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (Ridge Route & El Toro) / MEMORIAL PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Trabuco 2024-124
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road and Ridge Route Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph.

A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, two (2) involved a pedestrian, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 99.3%
X X 2 1.3% 97.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.0%
X 1 0.7% 94.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 93.3%
X 1 0.7% 92.7%
X X 2 1.3% 92.0%
X X X X 4 2.7% 90.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 88.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 83.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 76.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 70.7%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 62.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 58.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 13.3% 52.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.3% 39.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 23.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 23.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 14.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 10.7%
X X 2 1.3% 6.7%
X X 2 1.3% 5.3%
X X 2 1.3% 4.0%
X X 2 1.3% 2.7%
35 X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 150
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.7 %
File: Trabuco 2024-124

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.3%
58 X 97.3%
57 X 96.0%
56 X 94.0%
55 X 93.3%
54 X 92.7%
53 X 92.0%
52 X 90.7%
51 X 88.0% }PACE
50 X 83.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 76.7% }PACE
48 X 70.7% }PACE
47 X 62.0% }PACE
46 X 58.7% }PACE
45 X 52.7% }PACE
44 X 39.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 30.0% }PACE
HCI
44 X 39.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 30.0% }PACE
42 X 23.3% }PACE
41 X 14.7% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.7%
39 X 6.7%
38 X 5.3%
37 X 4.0%
36 X 2.7%
35 X 1.3%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.7 %
Trabuco 2024-124

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CHERRY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.14
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.27

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes drops to 2 Lanes-s/o El Toro) 18,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes drops to 2 Lanes-s/o El Toro)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO / CHERRY

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / CHERRY

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Entire Block)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES (Over Wash)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
SHORT DISTANCE BTWN SIGNALS (Surveyed on Green lights only) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (El Toro) / WASH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Trabuco 2024-125
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.5 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 99.4%
55 X 1 0.6% 97.8%
X 1 0.6% 97.2%
X X 2 1.1% 96.7%
X 1 0.6% 95.6%
X X X X 4 2.2% 95.0%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.8% 81.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 73.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 66.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.0% 58.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 48.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 43.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 35.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 43.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 35.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 28.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 25.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 18.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 15.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 10.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 6.7%
35 X X X X 4 2.2% 5.0%
X X 2 1.1% 2.8%
X 1 0.6% 1.7%
0 0.0% 1.1%
0 0.0% 1.1%
30 X X 2 1.1% 1.1%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 180
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.3 %
File: Trabuco 2024-125

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.4%
55 X 97.8%
54 X 97.2%
53 X 96.7%
52 X 95.6%
51 X 95.0%
50 X 92.8%
49 X 88.3% }PACE
48 X 81.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 73.3% }PACE
46 X 66.1% }PACE
45 X 58.9% }PACE
44 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 43.9% }PACE
HCI
43 X 43.9% }PACE
42 X 35.6% }PACE
41 X 28.3% }PACE
40 X 25.6% }PACE
39 X 18.3%
38 X 15.0% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 10.0%
36 X 6.7%
35 X 5.0%
34 X 2.8%
33 X 1.7%
32 X 1.1%
31 X 1.1%
30 X 1.1%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.3 %
Trabuco 2024-125

APPENDIX C

ATTACHMENT 2

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING
BUDGET; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

WHEREAS, the 2023-2025 Operating Budget was adopted by the City Council on June 20, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024-25 were adopted by the City Council on June 4, 2024;

WHEREAS, modifications are now required as a result of changes during Fiscal Year 2024-25.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE

FOREST DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council’s adoption of this Resolution is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, the City’s adoption of the Resolution is an administrative and fiscal function of the City that does not commit the City to any specific project or course of action. (State CEQA Guidelines, sections 15378(b)(4) & (b)(5).) Thus, no environmental review of the Resolution is required. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption within five working days of the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 2. The State Gas Tax HUTA Fund is amended to increase appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024-25 as demonstrated in Exhibit A.

Section 3. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to move appropriations between programs within program area budgets in concurrence with Department Directors.

Section 4. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from one program area to another or between funds within the Operating Budget with notification to the City Council Audit Committee.

Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from a capital improvement project to another existing project within the adopted Capital Improvement Program with notification to the City Council Audit Committee.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall attest as to the adoption and execution of this Resolution and cause the same to be maintained in the permanent records of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

ATTEST:

MARK TETTEMER
MAYOR

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MATTHEW RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )

I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024- was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the 19th day of November, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT A

AMENDMENT TO 2023-2025

OPERATING BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

APPROPRIATIONS

All Other Funds Operating Appropriations

Fund Name
Current
Budget
Increase
(Decrease) Amended Budget
Gas Tax (HUTA) $3,328,865 $25,000 $3,353,865

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

PROTECTED-PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN PHASING PROJECT - PHASE 2 (24T02)
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Award a Professional Consultant Services Agreement to AGA Engineers, Inc. (“Agreement”) in the amount of $91,745 for the Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 Design.

2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest to the Agreement with AGA Engineers, Inc., substantially in the form attached.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

As part of the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”), the City Council approved the Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project – Phase 2 (“Project”). The Project includes the flashing yellow arrow (“FYA”) traffic signal operation, which would be implemented at the following signalized intersections:
•Catalina at Alton Parkway
•Monarch at Alton Parkway
Following a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) process, staff recommends awarding an agreement with a compensation amount of $91,745 to AGA Engineers, Inc. to design the project under an initial three-year term with two optional one-year extensions (“Agreement”) (Attachment 1). The initial term will start on November 20, 2024, and end on November 19, 2027, unless earlier terminated or renewed per the Agreement. Staff performed a reference check for AGA Engineers, Inc. in accordance with the City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, which provided favorable reviews of services provided by AGA Engineers, Inc. at other local agencies (Attachment 2).

Additionally, the City Council directed staff to conduct a benefit-cost analysis for the Project, which involves removing landscaped medians and modifying the traffic signals to implement a FYA operation in compliance with current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“CA MUTCD”) standards. The estimated project cost is $700,000, while the projected annual savings from fuel,

3 1
3 9
greenhouse gas emissions, and reduced travel time (also referred as “people’s time”) is $400,000, suggesting that the savings will cover the project cost within two years. The project is expected to have a lifespan of over 20 years and the benefit-cost ratios are comparable to regional traffic signal synchronization projects.

The proposed agreement was prepared by the Finance Department and has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. The 2023-2025 CIP budget includes sufficient funds for the recommended action.

BACKGROUND:

On December 18, 2018, the City Council approved the Citywide Protective- Permissive Left Turn (“PPLT”) Phasing Study prepared by Albert Grover & Associates (“Albert Grover”). This included the following intersections for the installation of PPLTs in future phases:
•Catalina at Alton Parkway
•Monarch at Alton Parkway
PPLTs allow drivers to turn left with a protected green arrow as well as the ability to turn left on the green ball when there are sufficient gaps in traffic flow. As part of the Albert Grover study, Albert Grover recommended the use of Flashing Yellow Arrows (“FYA”) as the means to operate the PPLT. FYA is a form of PPLT phasing where a signal head features a flashing yellow arrow indication in addition to the steady green, yellow, and red arrow indications. During the FYA indication, vehicles can turn left after yielding to opposing traffic and pedestrians.

Based upon technical studies, the FYA signals have shown to help drivers make fewer driver errors, reduce delays, improve traffic flow, and improve traffic safety.

In April 2023, the City successfully installed the initial PPLT phase which were implemented at the following intersections:

•Towne Centre Drive and Market Place
•Centre Drive at Rockfield Boulevard
In addition, signing and striping improvements were implemented at the intersection of El Toro Road and Toledo Way per the Albert Grover PPLT Phasing Study.

As a continuation of the PPLT phasing program, staff identified the second phase of the program and included the anticipated final design and construction cost (in the amount of $425,000) within the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. 3 1
3 9
On March 18, 2024, staff solicited requests for proposals for the final design of the PPLT Phase 2 Project on the City’s eProcurement Portal, OpenGov.

On June 18, 2024, the City Council directed staff to return with additional information on the costs and benefits of permissive left hand turn lanes. Staff has completed the additional analysis which is included in this report.

DISCUSSION:

Albert Grover’s study determined that the intersection at Catalina and Alton Parkway would benefit from the installation of a PPLT phase for the north-south approaches for Catalina. Based on the volume of left-turning vehicles, opposing through traffic, and right turn volume, the PPLT implementation would provide additional opportunities for vehicles to make the left turns when conflicting traffic is not present to reduce driving delays and driver frustration. Physical improvements to the roadway include modifying the raised median, restriping lanes, removing landscaping, and conducting minor pavement rehabilitation.

Albert Grover’s study also identified that the intersection at Monarch and Alton Parkway would benefit from the installation of a PPLT phase for the north-south approaches for Monarch. Based on the volume of left-turning vehicles, opposing through traffic, and right turn volume, the PPLT implementation would provide additional opportunities for vehicles to make the left turns when conflicting traffic is not present to reduce driving delays and driver frustration. Physical improvements to the roadway include modifying the raised median, restriping lanes, removing landscaping, and conducting minor pavement rehabilitation.

With this understanding, staff initiated a competitive procurement process to solicit proposals for Professional Consulting Services for the final design of the PPLT Phase 2 Project. The solicitation was posted on the City’s eProcurement Portal, OpenGov, for three weeks. The Request for Proposal (“RFP”) received 186 public views and thirteen (13) firms downloaded the files associated with the procurement. Eight (8) firms elected to “follow” the project through the OpenGov system and one firm elected to submit a proposal for consideration.

Pursuant to the Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, the following City Manager-approved Selection Committee evaluated the submitted proposal and conducted the interview for the qualified proposer:
•Deputy City Manager, Management Services Department
•Principal Civil Engineer, Public Works Department
•Traffic Engineering Manager, Public Works Department
3 1
3 9
The Selection Committee evaluated the proposals based on the firm’s expertise and experience, response to the scope of work, and allocation of resources. In accordance with the City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, firms scoring a minimum of sixty (60) points on the qualitative evaluation portion may advance to the interview phase of the process. Based on their technical proposal scoring, the proposing firm, AGA Engineers, Inc., advanced to the interview round. The results of the qualitative evaluation and qualifications review are identified in the following tables.

Table 1: Technical Proposal Review Phase Scoring
Firm Evaluator
1 Evaluator
2 Evaluator
3 Total Average
Score
(Max. Score
100)
AGA Engineers, Inc. 77.5 81.5 90 83
Table 2: Interview and Cost Proposal Phase Scoring
Interview Scores
Cost
Proposal
Evaluation
Total
Score
Points Based 160 Points (80%) (Max Score
200)
Vendor
Rater
1 Rater
2 Rater
3 Combined
Average
Points
Based 40
Points
(20%)

AGA Engineers, Inc. 120.8 133.6 146.4 133.6 40 173.6
Following the interview process, staff reviewed the cost proposal from AGA Engineers, Inc. Since there were no other cost proposals to review, staff reviewed previous costs associated with similar professional consulting services awards in recent months and negotiated with AGA Engineers, Inc. for a reduced cost to design the Project.

Table 3: Cost Proposal Comparison
Firm Cost Proposal
AGA Engineers, Inc. $91,745
AGA Engineers, Inc. is a civil engineering firm specializing in transportation planning, traffic studies, design, development services, and signal operations.

The firm’s founding principals have led to the successful completion of a wide range of projects including comprehensive traffic operational improvement studies, traffic studies, traffic design plans, traffic signal synchronization 3 1
3 9
implementation plans, and traffic engineering services for other local agencies, regional agencies, transportation authorities, state, and federal agencies. In addition, key members of the team have served as staff at municipal agencies in Southern California and are keenly aware of the challenges and sensitivities associated with preparing, designing, and implementing traffic signal operational changes, such as what is proposed for this project.

Following the evaluation process, staff conducted a reference check with other local agencies that have contracted with AGA Engineers, Inc. for similar services.

The reference check responses yielded positive feedback from clients regarding the quality of work, professionalism, and customer service provided by AGA Engineers, Inc. The attached reference verification for AGA Engineers, Inc. supports staff’s recommendation to award the proposed Agreement to the firm (Attachment 2).

Benefit/Cost Analysis
At its June 18, 2024, meeting, the City Council directed staff to provide a benefit- cost analysis for the PPLT project.

Anticipated Project Cost Annual Project Benefits
$700,000*
*includes costs to remove landscaped
medians and traffic signal
modifications
$400,000**
**Value of savings of fuel, greenhouse
gas emissions, and motorist’s time
based on Orange County
Transportation Authority guidelines
Based on the above estimates, the estimated value of the project benefits would exceed the anticipated project costs after the second year. To note, this project is anticipated to have a life span of over 20 years. For comparison purposes, the regional traffic signal synchronization projects have similar benefit-cost ratios.

As for the specific physical improvements and traffic operations of the PPLT, staff would follow state engineering and traffic operations standards, which require the FYA signal indication to be centered in the left turn lane and that the opposing left turn lanes have a positive or neutral offset to allow for better visibility of the conflicting through lane. At both the Catalina/Alton Parkway and Monarch/Alton Parkway intersections, the signal mast arm is adequate but the opposing left turn lanes are at a negative offset due to the raised landscaped median. The raised landscaped median will need to be removed to improve the motorist’s line of sight of oncoming traffic as part of the project.

In addition to the physical improvements, the FYA traffic operation would marginally improve the overall traffic flow and reduce traffic delays as the 3 1
3 9
protected left turn arrow will be replaced with a FYA. With or without the proposed improvement, the intersection would continue to operate at a Level of Service C which is above the City’s minimum of Level of Service D. To note, a FYA operation is the same operation as a “green ball” designation on a signal head for left hand turning movements (also known as a permissive left hand turning movement).

Currently, the protected left turn arrow operation does not conflict with any other traffic movements within the intersection. Replacing a protected left turn arrow with a FYA operation requires motorists to yield to oncoming opposing motorists, pedestrians and/or bicyclists. The potential for a collision exists should a motorist fail to yield to a conflicting traffic movement at an intersection with an FYA. The Albert Grover study evaluated the two intersections and considered the overall traffic safety and improved traffic operations aspects of the FYA and recommended it to be implemented.

Therefore, staff recommends awarding the proposed Agreement to AGA Engineers, Inc. with a total compensation amount of $91,745, for an initial three- year term with two optional one-year extensions (Attachment 1). The initial term will start on November 20, 2024 and end on November 19, 2027, unless earlier terminated or renewed per the Agreement. The Agreement was prepared by the Finance Department and approved by the City Attorney as to form.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed Agreement includes a total compensation amount of $91,745.

Sufficient funds are included in the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan to cover the costs of the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Professional Consultant Services Agreement with AGA Engineers, Inc. for the Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project – Phase 2

2. Reference Check for AGA Engineers, Inc.

Initiated By: Tran Tran, Traffic Engineering Manager
Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager

Attachment 1

PROTECTED-PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN PHASING PROJECT
- PHASE 2 (2024-049)

City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.

Lake Forest, CA 92630

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62 City of Lake Forest
Professional Consultant Services Agreement
Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 I. PARTIES AND DATE. ................................ ................................ ..............

II. RECITALS. ................................ ................................ ..............................

III. TERMS................................. ................................ ................................ ..

IV. SIGNATURES. ................................ ................................ ........................

V. EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................ ...........................

VI. EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES ................................ ..................

VII. EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION ................................ ..............................

VIII. EXHIBIT "D" - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ................................ ...........

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 3 1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***], by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630 (“City”) and AGA Engineers, Inc., a California Corporation (Inc.) , with its principal place of business at 211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 4 2. RECITALS.

2.1. Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional Engineering Consulting Services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional Engineering Consulting Services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2. Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such Professional Engineering Consulting Services for the Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 5 3. TERMS.

3.1. Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Engineering Consulting Services consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from November 20, 2024 to November 19, 2027, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no more than two (2) additional one-year terms.

Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

3.2. Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 6 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Chalap K. Sadam, Project Manager.

3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates Thomas Wheeler, Director of Public Works / City Engineer, or his/her designee, to act as its representative in all matters pertaining to the administration and performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant but not the authority to enlarge the Scope of Work or change the total compensation due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on City's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Scope of Work or change the Consultant's total compensation subject to the provisions contained in Section 3.3 of this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City Manager, City's Representative or his/her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Chalap K. Sadam, President, or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 7 sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions, where applicable, shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.2.11 Insurance. Consultant agrees to procure and maintain, at Consultant’s expense all insurance specified in Exhibit “D” attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to carry the same policies and limits of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain, unless otherwise approved in writing by the City.

3.2.12 Water Quality Management and Compliance.

3.2.12.1 Storm Water Management. Storm, surface, nuisance, or other waters may be encountered at various times during the Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters, and assumes any and all risks and liabilities arising therefrom.

3.2.12.2 Compliance with Water Quality Laws, Ordinances and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Services including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the City’s ordinances regulating water quality and storm water; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq.); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code § 13000 et seq.); and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority. Consultant must additionally comply with the lawful requirements of the City, and any other Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 8 municipality, drainage district, or other local agency with jurisdiction over the location where the Services are to be conducted, regulating water quality and storm water discharges.

3.2.12.3 Compliance with DAMP and LIP. In addition to compliance with the laws, ordinances and regulations listed in Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement, Consultant must comply with all applicable requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (“DAMP”), the City of Lake Forest Local Implementation Plan (“LIP”) and the applicable Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”). The DAMP contains requirements related to design and construction of public projects. Consultant must be familiar the DAMP, and the LIP and comply with the requirements as specified therein.

A copy of the DAMP is available on the internet at:
http://www.ocwatersheds.com/documents/damp/mapplan
A copy of the LIP is available on the internet at:
http://www.lakeforestca.gov/296/Local-Implementation-Plan-LIP

3.2.12.4 Standard of Care. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to them without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in Sections 3.2.12.2 and 3.2.12.3 of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors have or will receive adequate training, as determined by the City, regarding these requirements as they may relate to the Services.

3.2.12.5 Liability for Non-compliance.
(A) Indemnity: Failure to comply with laws, regulations, and ordinances listed in Sections 3.2.12.2 and 3.2.12.3 of this Agreement is a violation of federal and state law. Notwithstanding any other indemnity contained in this Agreement, Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses or liabilities of any kind or nature which the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers may sustain or incur for noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and ordinances listed above, arising out of or in connection with the Services, except for liability resulting from the sole established negligence, willful misconduct or active negligence of the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees or authorized volunteers. (B) Defense: City reserves the right to defend any enforcement action or civil action brought against the City for Consultant’s failure to comply with any applicable water quality law, regulation, or policy. Consultant hereby agrees to be bound by, and to reimburse the City for the costs associated with, any settlement reached between the City and the relevant enforcement entity. (C) Damages: City may seek damages from Consultant for delay in completing the Services caused by Consultant’s failure to comply with the laws, regulations and policies described in Sections 3.2.12.2 and 3.2.12.3 of this Agreement, or any other relevant water quality law, regulation, or policy. regulation, or policy.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 9 3.3. Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed NINETY-ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($91,745.00) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly invoice which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The invoice shall describe the amount of Services provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the invoice. City shall, within 30 days of receiving such invoice, review the invoice and pay all non-disputed and approved charges thereon. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, the City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth therein.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City, or included in Exhibit "C" of this Agreement.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Rate Increases. In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rate set forth in Exhibit “C” may be adjusted each year at the time of renewal as set forth in Exhibit “C.”

3.4. Labor Code Requirements.

3.4.1 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 10 agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4.2 Registration. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR.

3.5. Accounting Records.

3.5.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.6. General Provisions.

3.6.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.6.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.6.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.6.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.6.1.4 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant: AGA Engineers, Inc.
211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208
Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 11 Fullerton, CA 92835
ATTN: Chalap K. Sadam, President
City: City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
ATTN: City Clerk
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.6.2 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.6.2.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.

3.6.2.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.6.2.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information ("Proprietary Information") unless the City's legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information. Consultant shall have five (5) Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 12 working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant's objection to the City's release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City's choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non- appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.6.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.6.4 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reason¬able attorney's fees and all other costs of such action.

3.6.5 Indemnification.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

3.6.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.6.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.6.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 13 3.6.9 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.6.10 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.6.11 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.6.12 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.6.13 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.6.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.6.15 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.6.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.6.17 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant¬, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.6.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 14 because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.6.19 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.6.20 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.6.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.7. Subcontracting.

3.7.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 15 4. SIGNATURES.

4.1. SIGNATURES.

CITY OF LAKE FOREST AGA Engineers, Inc.

By: [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]

Mark Tettemer
Mayor
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]

Greg Wong
Vice President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:

By: [CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]

Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]

Chalap K. Sadam
Secretary (Corporation or LLC)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: [CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

[CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL]
[PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL]
[CITY CLERK - INSURANCE APPROVAL]
Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 16 5. EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES

5.1. EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall provide the following Professional Engineering Consulting Services relative to the City's Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 project.

Task 1.0 Base/Preliminary Data Review

 Topography Survey and Design Surveying. Provide horizontal and vertical control points, arrange for design and compile mapping. Perform topographic and cross-section field surveys sufficient to control improvement designs and to identify and locate physical improvements to be protected, removed or joined by proposed improvements.

 Field Review - Conduct comprehensive field reviews with its designers to identify potential design constrictions and be familiar with the project area. Photograph and catalog existing site conditions and direct field surveyors in collection of additional measurements for design.

Task 2.0 Preliminary Engineering

 Develop Base Sheets - Prepare 40-scale base sheets of the project area in AutoCAD digital format (current version) for use by the project team.

 Preliminary Design and Studies - Develop preliminary plan and profile sheets using the project area base sheets prepared in Task 2.0. Prepare conceptual construction details and typical sections for the work area. The design shall include conceptual centerline alignment, drainage, and grading limits. The design shall include proposed disposition of existing facilities owned by utility companies and proposed right-of-entry requirements.

 Preliminary Construction Estimates - Develop an itemized list of quantities and a preliminary estimate of construction costs associated with the preliminary design. Prepare the estimate in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet format, including neatly prepared supporting quantity take-off.

 35% Submittal of Preliminary Plans - Submit to the City three sets of half-sized (11"x17") prints and PDF of preliminary plans preliminary cost estimate.

Task 3.0 Utility Coordination

 Utility Research, Notices and Base Mapping. Prepare and send letters to request information from known utility companies operating within the project area. The letters shall request record drawings of each utility's facilities as well as any planned improvements within the project area that may Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 17 affect the design of this project. Develop and maintain detailed records of correspondence and telephone contacts with each utility company in the project area. Provide these records to the City at design completion. Develop a digital master drawing depicting the location of known utilities based upon record drawings provided by utility companies.

 Utility Coordination - Submit two sets of preliminary plans to each utility company for review and comment. Prepare and send second notice letters to the known utility companies within the project area. Letters shall request each utility company review consultant's base mapping of utilities and that each utility company provide comments pertaining to all existing or planned improvements that may affect the design of this project. Preliminary plans shall identify all potential utility conflicts and shall request each utility company provide information regarding its relocation or protection requirements in response to the second notice.

 Update detailed records of correspondence and telephone contacts with each utility company in the project area to provide to the City at design completion. Upon receipt of any additional utility company plans or information regarding utility relocation or protection, update its digital master drawing for use in preparing final design plans.

Task 4.0 Plans

 Improvement Plans - Prepare design plans upon notice and proceed with final design. The final design will expand upon approved geometrics by incorporating the appropriate details and construction notes to clearly define the project improvements. Improvement plans shall include grading and drainage improvements, erosion control, signing and striping, traffic signal, landscape and irrigation, and utility plans. The plans will be prepared at a horizontal scale no greater than 1" = 40 '.

Task 5.0 Environmental and Water Quality Compliance

 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - Identify and quantify construction impacts. Prepare the SWPPP in accordance with the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements.

 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) - Prepare a WQMP as part of the preliminary hydrology and hydraulics report and in conformance with the City's WQMP requirements. Identify potential pollutants of concern for this project category, areas of special biological concern, environmentally sensitive areas, and develop recommendations for best management practices (BMPs) including structural and non-structural BMPs and other treatment BMPs and accounting for impacts to the overall project budget.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 18  CEQA Documentation – Determine and prepare appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed street improvements.

Task 6.0 Special Provisions

 Specifications - Consultant shall provide contract bid documents in the City's format ready for bidding including notice inviting bids, instructions to bidders, bid schedules, bond forms, project specifications, general specifications, and technical provisions. The City will provide a sample set of contract bid documents for consultant's reference. Contract documents shall be prepared in Microsoft Word for Windows format.

Task 7.0 Quantities and Cost Estimates

 Construction Estimates - Develop an itemized list of quantities and estimate of construction costs associated with the design. Cost estimate shall be using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet format, including neatly prepared supporting quantity take-off calculations, for submittal to the City.

Task 8.0 Critical Path Method (CPM) Schedule

 Provide schedule.

Task 9.0 Construction File/Project Close-out

 Prepare ‘as-built’ details on the original plans to accurately record final conditions of the construction.
 Prepare ‘as-built’ plans based on ’redline’ plans from the contractor.  Submit digital file consisting of Request for Information (“RFI”) responses, submittal reviews/submittal log, ‘as-built’ plans, and ‘red-line’ plans.

Task 10.0 Meeting, Presentations, and Exhibits

 Project Orientation - Conduct a kickoff meeting with City staff to discuss project goals, scope of work, project schedule, and any other pertinent information necessary for project design.

 Coordination Meetings - Consultant shall prepare meeting agendas, attend meetings, present project progress reports, receive direction, and prepare meeting action minutes during the duration of Task 2.0. For proposal purposes, consultant may assume bi-weekly meetings of up to two hours duration each.

Task 11.0 Reimbursables: Reproductions, Title Reports
Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 19  Include all reimbursable costs.

Task 12.0 Construction Engineering Support

 Provide support during the public bid process by responding to questions and clarifications.  Prepare necessary revisions to plans and specifications.  Respond to all construction activities at the job site as directed to address any questions related to design documents.
 Review and approve submittals.
 Maintain detailed records of field review logs, RFI log, and shop drawings/submittal log.  Prepare ‘punch-list’ items for contractor to address to ensure project has been constructed in accordance with plans and specifications.

Task 13.0 One-year Warranty Walk

 Review project one month prior to the one-year warranty and write warranty punch-list report for the contractor to address prior to final sign-off. The report shall be in compliance with the project PS&E and any and all approved changes.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 20 6. EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES

6.1. EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
The Consultant shall provide the services described in Exhibit “A” Scope of Services as directed by the City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 21 7. EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION

7.1. EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION
Consultant shall be paid for services in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement and as described above under Exhibit “A” Scope of Services and the not to exceed fee of NINETY-ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($91,745.00). Compensation shall be paid per the following schedule and terms.

AGA Engineers, Inc. Hourly Rates
Position Hourly Rate
President / Executive Vice President $ 280.00
Vice President $ 260.00
Director of Project Development $ 240.00
Principal Transportation Engineer / Principal Engineer $ 240.00 Senior Design Engineer $ 220.00
Senior Transportation Engineer $ 210.00
Senior Project Engineer & Project Manager $ 200.00 Senior Project Engineer / Senior Associate $ 195.00 Transportation Engineer III / Advanced System Integrator $ 195.00 Transportation Engineer II $ 185.00
Transportation Engineer I / Senior System Integrator $ 175.00 Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 22 Senior Signal Systems Specialist / Construction Inspector $ 175.00 Design Engineer/Signal Systems Specialist III $ 160.00 Associate Transportation Engineer III $ 160.00
Associate Transportation Engineer II / Signal System Specialist II $ 150.00 Signal System Specialist I / Project Coordinator $ 140.00 Associate Transportation Engineer I / Associate Engineer II $ 140.00 Associate Engineer I / Signal Technician II $ 130.00 Assistant Engineer / Assistant Project Coordinator $ 125.00 Signal Technician I $ 120.00
Transportation Engineering Assistant $ 110.00
Engineering Aide III $ 95.00
Traffic Enumerator / Engineering Aide II $ 85.00 Engineering Aide I $ 75.00
Council/Commission Meetings, Hearings, etc. (Billing Rate + $50 Surcharge) $ 1,000.00 Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 20%

In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rates set forth above may be increased or reduced each year at the time of renewal, but any increase shall not exceed the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 23 8. EXHIBIT "D" - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

8.1. EXHIBIT "D" - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

1.1.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

1.1.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so. (A) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); or (3) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
(B) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering "Any Auto" (Symbol 1), or the exact equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined limit for each occurrence.
(C) Workers’ Compensation: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
(D) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): Professional Liability insurance or Errors & Omissions insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution, testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.). If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.

1.1.3 Insurance Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 24 (A) Commercial General Liability:
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude "contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement. For all policies of Commercial General Liability insurance, Consultant shall provide endorsements in the form of ISO CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage) to effectuate this requirement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (B) Automobile Liability:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (C) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions):
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (2) Contractual Liability Exclusion Deleted: This insurance shall include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend.
(D) Workers’ Compensation:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (2) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.

1.1.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

1.1.5 Waiver of Subrogation. All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall contain or be endorsed to waive subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 25 loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

1.1.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

1.1.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates on forms approved by the City, together with all endorsements affecting each policy. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

1.1.8 Failure to Maintain Coverage. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement effective upon notice.

1.1.9 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to transact business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

1.1.10 Enforcement of Contract Provisions (non estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligation on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

1.1.11 Requirements Not Limiting. Requirement of specific coverage or minimum limits contained in this Appendix are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance.

1.1.12 Insurance for Subconsultants. Consultant shall include all subconsultants engaged in any work for Consultant relating to this Agreement as additional insureds under the Consultant's policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City, its Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62

Title: Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 26 officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds to the subconsultant's policies. All policies of Commercial General Liability insurance provided by Consultant’s subconsultants performing work relating to this Agreement shall be endorsed to name the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds using endorsement form ISO CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing equivalent coverage. Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract relating to this Agreement until it has received satisfactory evidence of subconsultant’s compliance with all insurance requirements under this Agreement, to the extent applicable. The Consultant shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with this section upon request of the City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 81DC344D-2C4E-4615-A869-AE7879571E62 Attachment 2
Contact #1: Contact #2: Contact #3:

Agency: OCTA City of Fountain Valley City of La Habra
Contact Info: Anup Kulkarni Kyle Knoke Michael Plotnik
Phone: 714-560-5867 714-593-4517 562- 383-4162
Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

QUESTIONS RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE

1. W
hat were the services
performed?
Regional Traffic Signal
Synchronization Program
Signal Performance
Me
asures & Traffic System
Regional Traffic Signal
Synchronization Program

2. How would you rate the quality
of work? Good. Very good. Very good.

3. D
id the firm meet all
deadlines? (Yes/No) Yes Yes Yes

4. W
as day-to-day
communication with the firm
satisfactory? (Yes/No)
Yes Yes Yes

5. W
ere there any issues with
t
he firm? (Yes/No) (No, please
ex
plain.)
No
No
I have personally worked
with AGA on upwards of 10
projects over my tenure and
have not had any issues
No

6. D
o you have any additional
comments or information
r
egarding your experience with
t
he firm?
Good firm to work with.

AGA is a reliable and
ex
perienced firm with
ex
cellent communication
s
kills and problem solving
a
bilities.

Happy with their work.

We've worked on quite a few
of these type of projects wit
h
t
hem.

CITY OF LAKE FOREST

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Protected-Permissive Phasing Project - PH 2
AGA Engineers, Inc.

Lake Forest City CouncilNovember 19, 2024

Lake Forest City Council
November 19, 2024