AGENDA
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of the City Council
Tuesday, November 19, 2024
Public Session 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California NOTICE: Pursuant to Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 2.04.010, Regular Meetings of the City Council are held the First and Third Tuesday of each month at the hour of 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session matters, if required.
The Public Session of the meeting shall commence at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Special Meeting times may be held at a different time and date as listed on the Agenda.
AGENDA DOCUMENT REVIEW: The Agenda and staff reports are available on the Internet at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas and at the City Clerk’s Office, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, on the Friday before the meeting on Tuesday.
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: The Agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public of a general summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The listed Recommended Action represents staff’s recommendation. The City Council may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the recommended action.
AGENDA ON SOCIAL MEDIA: This meeting will be streamed through Facebook Live. Comments will not be taken via Facebook Live. The City provides the Facebook Live stream as an additional service to the public.
However, the City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted. The City is not responsible for any interrupted service.
SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEETING AND PUBLIC COMMENT:
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: In addition to attending in person, members of the public may access the meeting live on our website at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas.
PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO THE MEETING: Members of the public may submit email comments to [email protected]. Email comments will be uploaded to the agenda packet and made part of the official public record of the meeting and will not be read at the meeting. To ensure staff reviews all comments prior to the City Council meeting, please submit email comments no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public may provide comments in-person at the meeting. Public comments will no longer be accepted remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in-person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk. To ensure prompt distribution to the City Council, members of the public wishing to provide written materials to the City Council should do so prior to the start of the meeting or as close thereto as possible, as time will not be taken during the public comment period to distribute written materials to the City Council.
TRANSLATION SERVICE: Interpreters are available by request to members of the public that prefer to make their public comments in Spanish or Chinese. Requests for a translator need to be received by 8:00 a.m. the Monday before the scheduled City Council meeting. Such requests must be received via email at [email protected]
November 19, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 Los intérpretes están disponibles previa solicitud para el público que prefiera hacer sus comentarios públicos en español o chino. Las solicitudes de traductor deben recibirse antes de las 8:00 a. m. del lunes anterior a la reunión programada del Concejo Municipal. Dichas solicitudes deben recibirse por correo electrónico a [email protected]
如果大眾願意用西班牙語或中文發表公開評論，我們可應要求提供口譯服務。需要在預定市議會會議之前的周一
上午 8:00 之前收到翻譯請求。此類請求必須透過電子郵件收到：[email protected] Rúguǒ dàzhòng yuànyì yòng xībānyá yǔ huò zhōngwén fābiǎo gōngkāi pínglùn, wǒmen kě yīng yāoqiú tígōng k ǒuyì fúwù. Xūyào zài yùdìng shì yìhuì huìyì zhīqián de zhōuyī shàngwǔ 8:00 Zhīqián shōu dào fānyì qǐngqiú. Cǐ l èi qǐngqiú bìxū tòuguò diànzǐ yóujiàn shōu dào: [email protected] CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m.
Council Members: Doug Cirbo
Robert Pequeño
Benjamin Yu
Mayor Pro Tem: Scott Voigts
Mayor: Mark Tettemer
City Manager: Debra Rose
City Attorney: Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk: Lisa Berglund
PUBLIC SESSION: 6:30 p.m.
PUBLIC SESSION: At this time, the City Council will convene to consider public matters. Those wishing to address the City Council must submit a completed “Request to Speak” form to the City Clerk prior to City Council action.
INVOCATION: The Invocation will be provided by a representative from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country to be led by Girl Scout Brownie Troop #1525.
PRESENTATIONS (Item No. 1)
1. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OC GO (MEASURE M)
November 19, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive Presentation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public can submit an e-comment to
[email protected]
. E-comments will
not
be read at the meeting.
Members of the public may also provide comments in-person at the meeting or remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in- person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Item Nos. 2 – 7)
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
2. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Said Ordinances and Resolutions which
appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
3. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve as submitted.
4. CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the warrant register in the amount of $6,951,641.59.
5. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NON-ARTERIAL STREETS ASPHALT REPAIRS ZONE D (24S01A)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve contract documents for
construction of Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A). 2.
Award a contract in the amount of $2,257,700.00, to LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp. 3. Reject all other bids received and authorize return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from LCR November 19, 2024
LAKE
FOREST CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Earthwork & Engineering Corp. 4. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp.
6. SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CARLSON
STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve the Sixth Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Sixth Amendment substantially in the form attached.
7. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
SERVICES WITH HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement for Traffic Engineering Services with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the Second Amendment with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc., substantially in the form attached.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS (Item Nos. 8 – 9)
The following matters are for City Council consideration/discussion/action. Members of the public may have the opportunity to address these items if they wish to do so. Please complete the Request to Speak form and give to the City Clerk.
8. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE FOREST,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING
BUDGET; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25.
November 19, 2024
LAKE
FOREST CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
9. PROTECTED-PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN PHASING PROJECT - PHASE 2 (24T02)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Award a Professional Consultant Services Agreement to AGA Engineers, Inc. (“Agreement”) in the amount of $91,745 for the Protected-Permissive Left Turn Phasing Project - Phase 2 Design. 2.
Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest to the Agreement with AGA Engineers, Inc., substantially in the form attached.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
At this time, the City Manager may comment on agenda and non-agenda items; and report on items of interest to the City Council and community.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
At this time, City Council Members may comment on agenda or non-agenda matters. No discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, respond to statements made or questions posed by the public, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. In addition, the City Council may refer to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting or direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. No action may be taken on non-agenda matters unless authorized by law (Government Code Section 54954.2).
Council Member Cirbo:
Council Member Pequeño:
Council Member Yu:
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts:
Mayor Tettemer:
November 19, 2024
LAKE
FOREST CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (949) 461-3400.
Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and agenda back-up materials can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk on the Friday prior to the City Council meeting. Copies of all Agendas, Staff Reports and Supporting Materials can also be found on the City’s website – https://www.lakeforestca.gov/129/Agendas
.
Agenda and agenda packets, if requested, will be made available in an appropriate alternative format to persons with a disability as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Copies of the agenda are provided at no cost and agenda back-up materials are available at the per page copy cost.
The City of Lake Forest mailing address is
City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California
.
Phone: (949) 461-3400. FAX (949) 461-3511
CERTIFICATION: I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review at City Hall on November 14, 2024.
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
November 19, 2024
LAKE
FOREST CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OC GO (Measure M) RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Receive Presentation.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) is the county transportation planning commission, responsible for funding and implementing transit and capital projects for a balanced and sustainable transportation system. OCTA is responsible for projects, programs and services that affect the daily quality of life for Orange County’s nearly 3.2 million residents in 34 cities and countless others who commute or come to Orange County for recreation. This includes bus and rail transit, rideshare, environmental programs, active transportation and express lanes and freeways.
Staff recommend the City Council receive and file a presentation from OCTA Executive Director of Planning Kia Mortazavi on OC Go. Also known as Measure M, OC Go is a 30-year one half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements in Orange County from 2011 through 2041.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Initiated By: Thy Merritt, Assistant City Clerk
Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:
MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
California Government Code 36934 allows titles of ordinances and resolutions to be waived.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, MPA, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
14 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Forest held Tuesday, November 5, 2024, at the Lake Forest City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, was called to order at 6:30 p.m. with all members present.
ROLL CALL:
Council Members:
Doug Cirbo
Robert Pequeño
Benjamin Yu
Mayor Pro Tem: Scott Voigts
Mayor: Mark Tettemer
City Manager: Debra Rose
City Attorney: Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk: Lisa Berglund
INVOCATION: The Invocation was provided by Community Outreach Pastor Laura Lepire, Saddleback Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country was led by Scout Troop #4321.
REPORT FROM STUDENT LIAISON: Maya Lowrey, Student Liaison from El Toro High School, provided a report.
PRESENTATIONS: (Item No. 1)
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Yu, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, to approve Presentation Item No. 1. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
1. RECOGNITION OF LAKE FOREST BUSINESSES NAMED IN THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER'S "BEST OF OC" AWARD PROGRAM
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Management Analyst Hairrel to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered.
ACTION: The presentation was received and filed.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
No public comment was offered.
CONSENT CALENDAR: (Item Nos. 2 – 8)
MOTION: It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to November 5, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 5
approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2 – 8. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
2. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appeared on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading was waived.
3. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON OCTOBER 15, 2024
ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.
4. QUARTERLY TREASURER'S REPORT - QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
ACTION: The report was received and filed.
5. APPROVAL OF MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT
ACTION: 1. The Director of Finance was authorized to submit the City of Lake Forest Annual Measure M2 Expenditure Report to the Orange County Transportation Authority. 2. A Resolution titled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR THE CITY OF LAKE
FOREST was adopted.
6. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST AND GRIFFITHS
RANCH LLC
ACTION: The second reading was conducted and an Ordinance entitled: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST AND GRIFFITHS RANCH LLC FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864 ET SEQ was adopted.
7. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 03-18- 5144
ACTION: The second reading was conducted and an Ordinance entitled: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 03-18-5144, CHANGING THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20751 LINEAR LANE;
SPECIFICALLY A PORTION OF APN 610-301-07 (PARCEL 2 OF TENTATIVE November 5, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 3 of 5
PARCEL MAP 2023-169) FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/ PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT TO OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION, AND THE REMAINING PORTION OF APN 610-301-07 FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO URBAN INDUSTRIAL 25, AND APNs 610-301-20 AND 21 FROM AGRICULTURE (“A 1”) TO URBAN INDUSTRIAL 25 (“UI 25”) was adopted.
8. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE LAKE
FOREST DRIVE REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
PROJECT
ACTION: 1. Amendment No. 1 to Cooperative Agreement No. C-9-1420 between Orange County Transportation Authority and the Cities of Lake Forest, Laguna Hills, and Irvine for Lake Forest Drive Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Project was approved. 2. The City Manager was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest Amendment No. 1 with Orange County Transportation Authority, substantially in the form attached.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS: (Item Nos. 9 – 11)
9. CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT FINAL SPENDING PLAN FOR STRATEGIC
ECONOMIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Economic Development/Housing Manager Grijalva to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered. Council questions were asked and answered.
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Pequeño, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, to: 1. Approve the Draft Strategic Economic Investment Program Final Spending Plan. 2. Approve a supplemental budget appropriation for the 2025 Taste of Lake Forest. 3. Authorize the City Manager to enter into the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee, Inc. and solely include the $50 and $100 gift card options with a limit of one gift card per purchaser for the Shop & Dine Community Gift Card Program. 4. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET, AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
10. RESOLUTION TO PROMOTE FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF OFFICIALS
AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
Mayor Tettemer turned the floor over to Mayor Pro Tem Voigts to provide a summary on this item. No public comment was offered. Council questions were asked and answered.
November 5, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 4 of 5
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Yu, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, to: Adopt a Resolution Entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA TO SUPPORT THE
CALL FOR THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ENACT LAWS THAT
PROMOTE EQUALITY IN GOVERNANCE
, and to send the resolution to Orange
County cities and legislators. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
11. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Assistant City Engineer Erdman to provide a presentation. No public comment was offered. Council questions were asked and answered.
ACTION: The presentation was received and filed.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: City Manager Rose had nothing further to report.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Council Member Cirbo:
Council Member Cirbo thanked staff for the Trunk or
Treat event at Foothill Ranch Elementary. He
recognized One Step Ministry and reminded everyone
of Veteran’s Day. He congratulated Council Member
Pequeño on his projected re-election to the District 5
council seat.
Council Member Pequeño:
Council Member Pequeño thanked staff for their hard
work. He reported on his attendance at the Trunk or
Treat event, the grand opening of Aldi, the League of
California Cities Annual Conference, and the Pop
Warner Orange Bowl. He congratulated Council
Member Cirbo on his projected re-election to the
District 1 council seat.
Council Member Yu:
Council Member Yu thanked staff for their hard work
and congratulated Council Member Cirbo and
Pequeño on their projected re-election
. He reminded
everyone of the importance of voting.
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts:
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts congratulated Council Member
Cirbo and Pequeño on their projected re-election,
thanked staff for their hard work, and wished City
Manager Rose a happy birthday
. He reported on his
attendance at the League of California Cities Annual
Conference.
November 5, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 5 of 5
Mayor Tettemer:
Mayor Tettemer congratulated Council Member Cirbo
and Pequeño on their projected re-election. He
reported on his attendance at the League of California
Cities Annual Conference, a tour of the San Onofre
Nuclear Generating Station hosted by the Association
of California Cities – Orange County, grand opening of
Aldi, and the Spooktacular event at the Sports Park.
ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 7:29 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
APPROVED:
LISA BERGLUND MARK TETTEMER
CITY CLERK MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT:
CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Approve the warrant register in the amount of $6,951,641.59.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In accordance with Government Code Section 37202 and Lake Forest Municipal Code Chapter 3.16, the official below certifies that 1) the invoices of the warrant register have been properly reviewed and 2) funds are available for payment of the warrants.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amount of the warrant register is $6,951,641.59.
ATTACHMENTS:
Warrant Register
Submitted By: Kevin Shirah, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 1 of 19
Check Report
City of Lake Forest By Check Number
Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Bank Code: OP-Operating
Payment Type: Manual
THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 10/04/2024 11197662.28Manual 0.00 11197 Invoice 10/04/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11197 PPE 09/27/2024 662.280.00 THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 10/18/2024 1119854.49Manual 0.00 11198 Invoice 10/18/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11198 PPE 10/11/2024 54.490.00 THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 10/18/2024 11199708.58Manual 0.00 11199 Invoice 10/18/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11199 PPE 10/11/2024 708.580.00 1,425.35Total Manual: 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 2 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Payment Type: Regular
11177 S MIRACLES LLC 10/17/2024 803915-500.00Regular 0.00 10852 ACCESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 10/03/2024 8045829,460.60Regular 0.00 15832-7 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 INSTALL TIMER/TRANSFORMER … 1,392.000.00 16158-2 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 REPAIR RR/HALLWAY LIGHTS JUL… 2,312.700.00 16158-4 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 RPLC LAMPS IN REC CTR HALLW… 345.500.00 16160-2 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 REPL LED LAMP JUL PORTOLA P… 737.900.00 16361 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 REPAIR SIGN LIGHTS AUG ALTON… 137.500.00 16445 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 RESET LIGHT TIMER AUG PORTO… 85.000.00 16454 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 INSPECT POWER (SYMPHONY C… 85.000.00 16486 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-048 EMERGENCY CALL/RPLC BREAKE… 4,365.000.00 10008 AGA ENGINEERS INC 10/03/2024 8045831,120.00Regular 0.00 24225-IN Invoice 10/03/2024 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL IMP STUDY JULY 2… 1,120.000.00 10009 AGE WELL SENIOR SERVICES 10/03/2024 8045845,148.48Regular 0.00 0824 Invoice 10/03/2024 SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM AUG 2024 5,148.480.00 10028 AMERINAT 10/03/2024 8045851,082.90Regular 0.00
LPM-24-001699 Invoice 10/03/2024 REHAB MONTHLY - AUG 2024 1,082.900.00 10028 AMERINAT 10/03/2024 804586522.00Regular 0.00
FS-5851 Invoice 10/03/2024 REHAB LOAN FEES - PHILLIPS 522.000.00 10041 ASCAP 10/03/2024 8045871,083.41Regular 0.00
09/23/2024 Invoice 10/03/2024 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 1,083.410.00 11289 ASHLEY JEWELL 10/03/2024 804588500.00Regular 0.00 2003166.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8780 500.000.00 10042 ASSURED TELEMATICS INC 10/03/2024 804589190.00Regular 0.00 136403 Invoice 10/03/2024 FLEET GPS UNITS 190.000.00
10044 AT&T CALNET3 10/03/2024 804590405.67Regular 0.00
000022303223 Invoice 10/03/2024 EMERGENCY CIRCUITS CIVIC CENTER 08/13… 405.670.00 10052 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 10/03/2024 80459118,256.00Regular 0.00 24091 Invoice 10/03/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT RESPONSE AUG 2… 10,542.500.00 24093 Invoice 10/03/2024 2023-031 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT ROUTIN… 7,713.500.00 10062 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 10/03/2024 804592155,275.88Regular 0.00 9018344 Invoice 10/03/2024 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AU… 3,625.000.00 9054111 Invoice 10/03/2024 MULCH INSTALL AUG 2024 LFSP 4,800.000.00 9054113 Invoice 10/03/2024 MULCH INSTALL AUG SPORTS PARK 1,600.000.00 9059404 Invoice 10/03/2024 REPLC BASEBALL FIELD ANCHORS AUG SP… 2,271.460.00 9061782 Invoice 10/03/2024 2023-083 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SEP 2… 58,208.290.00 9061783 Invoice 10/03/2024 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SEP… 81,146.130.00 9061791 Invoice 10/03/2024 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SEP… 3,625.000.00 11300 CALEB & MARIBEL RIOS 10/03/2024 8045933,000.00Regular 0.00 RESB-01-22-51886 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 3,000.000.00 11284 CITY OF SANTA ANA 10/03/2024 8045944,602.24Regular 0.00 VU12 Invoice 10/03/2024 REGIONAL ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING… 4,602.240.00 10523 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 10/03/2024 8045955,670.00Regular 0.00 L241620427 Invoice 10/03/2024 INTERIM BILLING - FIN STMTS, SINGLE AUD… 5,670.000.00 10109 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER TAX 10/03/2024 804596116,217.31Regular 0.00 PW240620 Invoice 10/03/2024 EMERGENCY SPILL RESPONSE 11/23 - 1/24 13,207.940.00 PW250110 Invoice 10/03/2024 D04-050 ALISO CREEK/WQIP FY24/25 4,518.470.00 PW250223 Invoice 10/03/2024 MA-080-23010376 NUTRIENTS, FECAL, TO… 98,490.900.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 10/03/2024 8045972,955.65Regular 0.00 3324 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE CITY EVENT COMM C… 654.490.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 3 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 3325 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8802 COMM… 368.490.00 3326 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7659 PAC 9/… 413.600.00 3327 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7711 COMM… 368.490.00 3328 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8691 PAC 9/… 413.600.00 3331 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8558 COMM… 368.490.00 3332 Invoice 10/03/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7711 COMM… 368.490.00 11293 CROWN HOMESCHOOL 10/03/2024 804598200.00Regular 0.00 2003175.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8558 200.000.00 10122 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 10/03/2024 80459998.00Regular 0.00 760407 Invoice 10/03/2024 LIVESCAN FINGERPRINTING AUG 98.000.00 10134 ECONOMICS INC 10/03/2024 8046009,765.03Regular 0.00 2021-22.38 Invoice 10/03/2024 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE & … 4,655.410.00 2022.29 Invoice 10/03/2024 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE & … 5,109.620.00 10155 FASTSIGNS OF LAKE FOREST 10/03/2024 804601387.90Regular 0.00 2016-19172 Invoice 10/03/2024 PARK FACILITY "UNDER CONSTRUCTION" S… 387.900.00 10160 FIELDTURF USA INC 10/03/2024 8046026,000.00Regular 0.00 719883 Invoice 10/03/2024 2022-083 LFSP FIELD A MAINTENANCE SEP… 3,000.000.00 719887 Invoice 10/03/2024 2022-083 LFSP FIELD B MAINTENANCE SEP… 3,000.000.00 10496 GEOGRAPHICS 10/03/2024 8046033,658.50Regular 0.00 24-23777 Invoice 10/03/2024 LEAFLET DESIGN FALL 2024 3,658.500.00 11285 GTFO GAMES LLC 10/03/2024 804604736.45Regular 0.00 000467 Invoice 10/03/2024 MOBILE ESCAPE ROOM FOR SPOOKTACUL… 736.450.00 11294 HELLE VON SCHLEGELL 10/03/2024 804605450.00Regular 0.00 2003174.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7582 450.000.00 10194 INTERWEST CONSULTING 10/03/2024 80460664,767.83Regular 0.00 631671 Invoice 10/03/2024 BUILDING & SAFETY SERVICES AUG 2024 56,285.650.00 631715 Invoice 10/03/2024 BLDG AFTER-HOUR/EMERGENCY INSPECT… 900.480.00 657741 Invoice 10/03/2024 BLDG NON-PERMIT BO INSPECTIONS AUG … 3,451.840.00 753399 Invoice 10/03/2024 BUILDING NON-PERMIT SERVICES AUG 20… 4,129.860.00 10198 ITERIS INC 10/03/2024 8046077,571.25Regular 0.00
173771 Invoice 10/03/2024 2021-032 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AUG 2… 7,571.250.00 11291 JOE A GONSALVES & SON 10/03/2024 8046083,750.00Regular 0.00 161929 Invoice 10/03/2024 STATE LOBBYING SERVICES SEP 2024 3,750.000.00 11281 JONATHAN BRIGGS SR 10/03/2024 804609495.00Regular 0.00 091724-1 Invoice 10/03/2024 CLUBHOUSE HOLIDAY CAROLERS 12/12 495.000.00 10495 KONICA MINOLTA 10/03/2024 804610247.42Regular 0.00 45564764 Invoice 10/03/2024 LEASE FOR COMMUNITY CENTER COPIER (… 247.420.00 10223 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 10/03/2024 804611504.28Regular 0.00 9010110769 Invoice 10/03/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR 24 HP PRINTERS 8/15 -… 504.280.00 10655 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES INC 10/03/2024 80461211,159.20Regular 0.00 2405.12-003 Invoice 10/03/2024 KOSMONT RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS 11,159.200.00 10228 LAKE FOREST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 10/03/2024 80461310,500.00Regular 0.00 Q109052024 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-060 CONTRACT PAYMENT 1 OF 4 - Q1 10,500.000.00 10125 LIGHTBOX PARENT, L.P. 10/03/2024 8046143,161.45Regular 0.00 INVLBP06668 Invoice 10/03/2024 PROP OWNERSHIP DATA ANNL LICENSE/D… 3,161.450.00 11292 MARILYN JOHNSON 10/03/2024 80461526.00Regular 0.00 2003176.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND BUNCO NIGHTS 12667 26.000.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 4 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 11298 MARS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 10/03/2024 80461610,000.00Regular 0.00 COMB-02-23-588…Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 10,000.000.00 10263 NETFILE 10/03/2024 8046172,500.00Regular 0.00
9665 Invoice 10/03/2024 4TH QTR SUBS CAMPAIGN & 700 SEI SYS 1… 2,500.000.00 THB004892 NICOLE HOUSTON 10/03/2024 804618815.43Regular 0.00 10/15/2024 Invoice 10/03/2024 COBRA PREMIUM - NOVEMBER 2024 815.430.00 11287 NIMFA YU 10/03/2024 80461942.00Regular 0.00
2003168.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND MOTION PICTURE MUSEUM EXC… 42.000.00 10267 NOAH HOLLAND TORGESON 10/03/2024 804620400.00Regular 0.00 20241005 Invoice 10/03/2024 DJ SERVICES FOR SPECIAL NEEDS DANCE 1… 400.000.00 10273 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 10/03/2024 804621162.00Regular 0.00 84352542 Invoice 10/03/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND CHECKS… 162.000.00 10577 ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH UNDERWRITERS10/03/2024 804622500.00Regular 0.00 2003172.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8534 500.000.00 11299 RCS BUILDERS 10/03/2024 8046232,400.00Regular 0.00 RESB-11-23-62198 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 2,400.000.00 11044 RONALD A SAGONA 10/03/2024 804624180.00Regular 0.00 108248 Invoice 10/03/2024 BACKFLOW TESTING 25130 RIDGE RTE SEP… 90.000.00 108277 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-009 BACKFLOW TESTING 25130 RID… 45.000.00 108293 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-009 BACKFLOW TESTING 24368 RID… 45.000.00 11290 ROSALIE REYES 10/03/2024 804625210.02Regular 0.00 09/23/2024 Invoice 10/03/2024 EXP REIM CA RESOURCE RECOVERY ASSOC… 210.020.00 10858 RUSSELL RING 10/03/2024 8046261,625.00Regular 0.00 5472 Invoice 10/03/2024 MOBILE LASER TAG FOR SPOOKTACULAR … 1,625.000.00 11296 SERNA CONTRACTORS INC 10/03/2024 8046271,500.00Regular 0.00 RESB-10-23-61845 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 1,500.000.00 10325 SHELTERCLEAN SERVICES INC 10/03/2024 8046285,385.90Regular 0.00 784958 Invoice 10/03/2024 2024-042 BUS SHELTER MAINTENANCE A… 5,385.900.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10/03/2024 8046298,225.20Regular 0.00 5025 09/16/2024 Invoice 10/03/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL UTILITIES AUG 2024 8,225.200.00 10337 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 10/03/2024 8046301,697.65Regular 0.00 0000598746 Invoice 10/03/2024 PUB HEARING, IRRIG CONSERV, ELECT CA… 1,697.650.00 11286 SRAVANTHI KAMISETTI 10/03/2024 804631200.00Regular 0.00 2003119.021 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8341 200.000.00 11295 SYDNEY POKARD 10/03/2024 80463210,000.00Regular 0.00 COMB-12-23-625…Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 10,000.000.00 10390 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 10/03/2024 80463343,247.16Regular 0.00 4348 09/25/2024 Invoice 10/03/2024 CAL-CARD PURCHASES SEP 42,638.370.00 6249 09/25/2024 Invoice 10/03/2024 CAL-CARD PURCHASES SEP 608.790.00 10398 VERIZON WIRELESS 10/03/2024 8046341,891.60Regular 0.00 9973726331 Invoice 10/03/2024 CELLULAR PHONES & DATA SERVICE 8/13 -… 1,891.600.00 11301 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES LLC 10/03/2024 8046356,421.68Regular 0.00 82642480 Invoice 10/03/2024 TRASH CANS - TEMPORARY & WASHABLE 6,421.680.00 11297 WENXIA YAN 10/03/2024 804636500.00Regular 0.00
RESB-10-23-61906 Invoice 10/03/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 500.000.00 10000 A SOURCE OF PRIDE 10/10/2024 80463750.80Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 5 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 9110861 Invoice 10/10/2024 NAMETAGS - DEPUTYS DEBOLT, VASQUEZ 50.800.00 10001 ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC 10/10/2024 80463836,057.78Regular 0.00 2409020-IN Invoice 10/10/2024 MOBILE MANAGEMENT DEVICE CLOUD A… 1,327.780.00 406053S-IN Invoice 10/10/2024 SPORTS PARK CABLE CLEANING PROJECT - … 1,980.000.00 W205238-IN Invoice 10/10/2024 COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES AUG 2024 32,750.000.00 10852 ACCESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 10/10/2024 8046397,569.50Regular 0.00 16164-8 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-036 PARKING LOT LIGHTS AUG FOO… 7,569.500.00 10007 ADVANTAGE MAILING LLC 10/10/2024 80464031,052.20Regular 0.00 213337 Invoice 10/10/2024 PRINTING FALL LEAFLET / REC GUIDE 31,052.200.00 10016 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 10/10/2024 804641775,510.12Regular 0.00 PROG PYMT 3 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-004 TRABUCO REHAB/ASCENSION M… 775,510.120.00 10017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 10/10/2024 80464220,163.87Regular 0.00 95475 Invoice 10/10/2024 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 9/1 - 9/14 20… 20,163.870.00 11256 AMERICAN BIKE PATROL SERVICES 10/10/2024 80464319,997.39Regular 0.00 144701 Invoice 10/10/2024 E-BIKES FOR BIKE PATROL 19,997.390.00 10039 ARDURRA GROUP INC 10/10/2024 80464492,216.50Regular 0.00 154432REV Invoice 10/10/2024 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AUG 2024 92,216.500.00 10052 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 10/10/2024 80464510,350.00Regular 0.00 24092 Invoice 10/10/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT DIG ALERT AUG 2… 10,350.000.00 10062 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 10/10/2024 804646387.35Regular 0.00 9099454 Invoice 10/10/2024 MONTHLY IRRIGATION REPAIRS AUG CIVIC… 387.350.00 10066 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS10/10/2024 8046471,240.00Regular 0.00 200031557 Invoice 10/10/2024 ANNUAL CACEO CONFERENCE - L MONTA… 620.000.00 200031558 Invoice 10/10/2024 ANNUAL CACEO CONFERENCE - W KARUGA 620.000.00 10074 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT 10/10/2024 804648147.70Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 REMIT ID 200000002413681 SDU/TRIBAL … 147.700.00 10075 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 10/10/2024 8046499,051.16Regular 0.00 7508024 Invoice 10/10/2024 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION JULY 2024 3,397.400.00 8508024 Invoice 10/10/2024 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION AUG 2024 5,653.760.00 10079 CALPERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM 10/10/2024 804650238.85Regular 0.00 15458159 Invoice 10/10/2024 EE CONT PPE 10/11/2024 238.850.00 11302 CARMOE 10/10/2024 8046511,670.00Regular 0.00
SDP 09-24-5731 Invoice 10/10/2024 REFUND PLANNING DEPOSIT 1,670.000.00 10095 CITY OF LAKE FOREST SUNSHINE CLUB 10/10/2024 804652162.00Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EE CONT PPE 09/27/2024 162.000.00 11307 COGENT SIGNS 10/10/2024 8046531,538.75Regular 0.00 PA 07-24-5723 Invoice 10/10/2024 REFUND DEPOSIT (27051 TOWNE CENTER… 1,538.750.00 THB004967 CONNOR MUSLER 10/10/2024 80465472.76Regular 0.00 09/30/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXP REIMB MILEAGE - RIVERSIDE CONVEN… 72.760.00 10109 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER TAX 10/10/2024 8046551,793,179.43Regular 0.00 PW250199 Invoice 10/10/2024 ILLICIT DISCHARGE SPILL RESPONSE 1,831.980.00 PW250237 Invoice 10/10/2024 SOUTH OC WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 8,703.030.00 SH 69341 Invoice 10/10/2024 AFIS FINGERPRINT AUG 2024 2,605.000.00 SH 69690 Invoice 10/10/2024 LAW ENFORCEMENT OCT 2024 1,780,039.420.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 10/10/2024 8046561,598.48Regular 0.00 3329 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXTRA JANITORIAL SVC FOR BASEBALL NCS… 280.000.00 3336 Invoice 10/10/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES PERMIT 7399 COMM… 859.590.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 6 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 3337 Invoice 10/10/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES PERMIT 8993 COMM… 458.890.00 10117 DANIEL E DUNKLEBERG 10/10/2024 804657100.00Regular 0.00 35023 Invoice 10/10/2024 PLANNING COMMISSION NAMEPLATES F… 100.000.00 11303 DANIEL JUSTIN REYES 10/10/2024 804658150.00Regular 0.00 001-2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 SPEAKER / SINGER - MAYOR'S LUNCHEON … 150.000.00 THB001154 DEBRA D ROSE 10/10/2024 8046592,047.63Regular 0.00 10/07/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXP REIM ICMA ANNUAL CONF PITTSBUR… 2,047.630.00 11305 EHSAN MATOORI 10/10/2024 804660500.00Regular 0.00 2003181.021 Invoice 10/10/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7659 500.000.00 10143 ERIC WINTER 10/10/2024 804661816.00Regular 0.00
6060 Invoice 10/10/2024 AV SERVICES FOR CITY COUNCIL 9/3 & 9/17 816.000.00 10914 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 10/10/2024 80466233.39Regular 0.00 028975571 Invoice 10/10/2024 UNIFORMS - HOMELESS OUTREACH 33.390.00 10170 GMU GEOTECHNICAL INC 10/10/2024 8046631,370.00Regular 0.00 66634 Invoice 10/10/2024 3RD PARTY REVIEW AUG PORTOLA NE PA… 1,370.000.00 10197 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 10/10/2024 804664187,643.64Regular 0.00 24-07 Invoice 10/10/2024 WATER SERVICES JUL CC, LFSP, MP, SLOPE… 96,252.900.00 24-08 Invoice 10/10/2024 WATER SERVICES AUG CC, LFSP, MP, SLOP… 91,390.740.00 10203 JAMEY CLARK INC 10/10/2024 8046652,752.86Regular 0.00 75455 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-047 MIRROR INSTALL - ACTIVITY RO… 1,942.860.00 75555 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-047 DRINKING FTN REPAIR SEP BAKE… 450.000.00 75556 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-047 ROOF CLEANING SEP CIVIC CENT… 360.000.00 THB001263 JENNIFER M MANSUR 10/10/2024 80466692.46Regular 0.00 09/30/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXP REIMB MILEAGE - RIVERSIDE CONVEN… 92.460.00 THB004886 JOHNCARLO MEZA 10/10/2024 8046672,587.44Regular 0.00 10/08/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXP REIMB OPENGOV TRANSFORM ARLIN… 2,587.440.00 10226 L & M AUTOMOTIVE 10/10/2024 804668528.47Regular 0.00 55892 Invoice 10/10/2024 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2013 TOYOTA TA… 528.470.00 10235 LOOPNET 10/10/2024 804669356.00Regular 0.00
120724971-1 Invoice 10/10/2024 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES NOW (FRONT-… 356.000.00 10236 LSA ASSOCIATES INC 10/10/2024 804670201.25Regular 0.00 195379 Invoice 10/10/2024 WESTERN REALCO EIR THROUGH AUG 2024 201.250.00 10428 MARIO CESAR TREJO AXXESS DOOR CORP 10/10/2024 8046711,118.29Regular 0.00 14450 Invoice 10/10/2024 DOOR REPAIR / LATCH REPLC SEP LFSP 1,118.290.00 10241 MASTER WASH INC 10/10/2024 804672600.00Regular 0.00 79130 Invoice 10/10/2024 CITY VEHICLE WASH SEP 2024 600.000.00 10468 MISSIONSQUARE 10/10/2024 80467311,068.90Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 DEFERRED COMP ACCR 303669 PPE 09/27… 11,068.900.00 10250 MONOGRAM MAGIC 10/10/2024 80467484.62Regular 0.00 13668 Invoice 10/10/2024 STARS UNIFORMS 18.940.00
13801 Invoice 10/10/2024 UNIFORMS - COMMUNITY CENTER 65.680.00 10265 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 10/10/2024 804675203,841.77Regular 0.00 78822 Invoice 10/10/2024 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SEP PASSIVE PA… 73,736.270.00 78823 Invoice 10/10/2024 MP/SLOPES MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SEP 87,261.670.00 78912 Invoice 10/10/2024 INSTALL MULCH SEP LOS ALISOS/MUIRLA… 1,200.000.00 78913 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG OLD TRABUCO 371.740.00 78914 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG LAKE FOREST/TR… 345.000.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 7 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 78915 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS AUG OLD TRABUCO 197.000.00 78916 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG RIDGE ROUTE/JE… 427.500.00 78917 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG RIDGE ROUTE/… 345.000.00 78918 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR SEP TRABUCO/PASEO … 510.000.00 78919 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG RIDGE ROUTE/JE… 319.000.00 78920 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG LAKE FOREST/OV… 345.000.00 78921 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR AUG RIDGE ROUTE/… 345.000.00 78922 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS AUG TRABUCO/RED … 345.000.00 78923 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS AUG ALTON/CATALI… 345.000.00 78924 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS AUG RIDGE ROUTE/… 690.000.00 78925 Invoice 10/10/2024 CURB CLEAN UP SEP CANADA RD 2,380.000.00 78926 Invoice 10/10/2024 REMOVE/FLATTEN SOIL SEP VISTA FUSCO 682.000.00 79020 Invoice 10/10/2024 PLAYGROUND WOODCHIPS SEPT PASSIVE … 25,440.090.00 79021 Invoice 10/10/2024 INSTALL MULCH/PLANTS SEP SKATEPARK 3,201.000.00 79022 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR SEP SERRANO CREEK … 922.000.00 79023 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIR SEP VETERANS PARK 795.000.00 79024 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP BAKE/JERONIMO… 453.000.00 79025 Invoice 10/10/2024 REPLC IRRIGATION ON SLOPES AUG EL TO… 411.000.00 79026 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP RIDGE ROUTE/S… 382.500.00 79027 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP LAKE FOREST/TO… 427.500.00 79028 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP LAKE FOREST/JE… 411.000.00 79029 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP LAKE FOREST/SE… 394.500.00 79030 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP LAKE FOREST/SE… 411.000.00 79031 Invoice 10/10/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEP LAKE FOREST/M… 748.000.00 11304 OPPENHEIMER NATIONAL 10/10/2024 80467758,780.87Regular 0.00 1 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-029 DRAINAGE SEPT CIVIC CENTER 58,780.870.00 10280 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE 10/10/2024 804678252.60Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 LOF NO. 30-2019-01097622-CL-CL-CJC PPE… 252.600.00 THB001588 PETER MEIER 10/10/2024 8046791,223.96Regular 0.00 10/07/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXP REIMB CASQA CONF SACRAMENTO 10… 1,223.960.00 10434 PREHISTORIC INC JURASSIC PARTIES 10/10/2024 804680925.00Regular 0.00 26262 Invoice 10/10/2024 REPTILE ROOM FOR SPOOKTACULAR 10/26 925.000.00 10304 RAMIRO ACEVEDO 10/10/2024 80468137,735.00Regular 0.00 2024-60 Invoice 10/10/2024 2024-087 OXFORD PREP / MT GLEN ADA … 37,735.000.00 10305 RANCHO VIEJO II HOA 10/10/2024 8046821,089.00Regular 0.00 22702 10-01-2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 22702 MADRID HOA PAYMENT NOV PTM-… 544.500.00 22706 10-01-2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 22706 MADRID HOA PAYMENT NOV PTM-… 544.500.00 THB004894 SEAN MCGOVERN 10/10/2024 804683270.34Regular 0.00 10/07/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXP REIMB ICMA 2024 CONF PITTSBURGH… 270.340.00 10925 SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY 10/10/2024 8046848,730.60Regular 0.00 B0FJ1G DENTAL Invoice 10/10/2024 FTE DENTAL PREMIUM SEP 2024 7,013.500.00 B0FJ1G VISION Invoice 10/10/2024 FTE VISION PREMIUM SEP 2024 1,717.100.00 10893 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY HOLDING LLC 10/10/2024 804685572.63Regular 0.00 146112708-001 Invoice 10/10/2024 BASEBALL FIELD CHALK FOR SOFTBALL LE… 572.630.00 10329 SO CAL INDUSTRIES 10/10/2024 8046861,400.76Regular 0.00 698734 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXTRA RESTROOMS FOR JULY CONCERT 6/… 592.630.00 706875 Invoice 10/10/2024 EXTRA RESTROOMS FOR AUGUST CONCER… 808.130.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10/10/2024 8046874,596.89Regular 0.00 3725 09/18/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 PARK UTILITIES SEP 2024 4,596.890.00 10353 TAIT & ASSOCIATES INC 10/10/2024 8046884,887.50Regular 0.00 162631 Invoice 10/10/2024 JERONIMO / EL TORO WIDENING AUG 2024 3,622.500.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 8 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 162632 Invoice 10/10/2024 EL TORO RAISED MEDIAN DESIGN AUG 20… 1,265.000.00 10372 TRABUCO CANYON WATER DISTRICT 10/10/2024 804689309.93Regular 0.00 09/17/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 MPS UTILITIES EL TORO/PORTOLA METER … 309.930.00 10385 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 10/10/2024 804690232.00Regular 0.00 920240384 Invoice 10/10/2024 UNDERGROUND SERVICES DIG ALERTS SE… 232.000.00 10391 US BANK PARS 10/10/2024 8046912,705.16Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 PARS CONT PPE 09/27/2024 2,705.160.00 10392 US DEPT OF TREASURY 10/10/2024 804692922.39Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 LUM… Invoice 10/10/2024 AGENCY TRACKING WG2122418 PPE 09/2… 922.390.00 10392 US DEPT OF TREASURY 10/10/2024 804693950.62Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 AGENCY TRACKING WG2122418 PPE 09/2… 950.620.00 10392 US DEPT OF TREASURY 10/10/2024 804694191.76Regular 0.00 09/27/2024 RET… Invoice 10/10/2024 AGENCY TRACKING WG2122418 PPE 09/2… 191.760.00 10783 VALLEY CITIES GONZALES FENCE INC 10/10/2024 80469529,343.47Regular 0.00 2255 Invoice 10/10/2024 PARK FENCING RENTAL AUG 29,343.470.00 10506 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 10/10/2024 80469616,917.00Regular 0.00 219511 Invoice 10/10/2024 TREE MAINTENANCE 8/16 - 8/31 16,917.000.00 10408 WESTAMERICA COMMUNICATIONS 10/10/2024 8046972,357.19Regular 0.00 365884 Invoice 10/10/2024 PARK OUTREACH POSTCARDS 2,357.190.00 10491 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 10/10/2024 8046984,606.00Regular 0.00 00714235 Invoice 10/10/2024 CDBG CONSULTING AUG 2024 4,606.000.00 11306 XUEDI WANG 10/10/2024 804699185.00Regular 0.00
2003182.021 Invoice 10/10/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8539 185.000.00 11260 425 VENTURES LLC 10/17/2024 8047006,785.80Regular 0.00 12502 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 709.100.00 12504 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 403.200.00 12505 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 608.300.00 12507 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 504.000.00 12509 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 201.600.00 12510 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 302.400.00 12512 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 403.200.00 12513 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 201.600.00 12514 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 403.200.00 12515 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 201.600.00 12516 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 611.800.00 12517 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 302.400.00 12518 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 403.200.00 12521 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 403.200.00 12522 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 604.800.00 12524 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 305.900.00 12525 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 100.800.00 12526 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 115.500.00 10430 A&H COMMUNICATIONS INC 10/17/2024 80470118,353.32Regular 0.00 980002371 Invoice 10/17/2024 AV SYSTEM MAINTENANCE JUL - OCT 2024 18,353.320.00 11232 ABBA TERMITE & PEST CONTROL INC 10/17/2024 804702235.00Regular 0.00 19384F Invoice 10/17/2024 2024-061 BEE REMOVAL SEP IRRIG BOX EL… 235.000.00 10001 ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC 10/17/2024 80470332,750.00Regular 0.00 W205407-IN Invoice 10/17/2024 COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES - OCT 2024 32,750.000.00 10852 ACCESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 10/17/2024 8047044,906.00Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 9 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 16532-3 Invoice 10/17/2024 2024-048 REPAIR LIGHTS AUG EL TORO P… 3,574.750.00 16653-2 Invoice 10/17/2024 2024-048 LIGHT INSTALLS SEP ALTON PARK 1,331.250.00 10006 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 10/17/2024 804705234.00Regular 0.00 1089869688 Invoice 10/17/2024 SECURITY QUARTERLY SERVICE 10/8-1/7/… 234.000.00 10873 ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES INC 10/17/2024 80470659,064.85Regular 0.00 17886412 Invoice 10/17/2024 2023-040 STREET SWEEPING SEP 2024 59,064.850.00 10903 ARB INC 10/17/2024 804707150.00Regular 0.00
2003198.021 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8264 150.000.00 10051 BARRIOS & ASSOCIATES LLC 10/17/2024 80470815,750.00Regular 0.00 2402-918 Invoice 10/17/2024 SMP TAXI PROGRAM EXPANSION 15,750.000.00 10062 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 10/17/2024 8047097,647.18Regular 0.00 9101703 Invoice 10/17/2024 2021-040 INSTALL SHRUBS SEP CIVIC CEN… 7,647.180.00 11308 CA TKD CENTER INC 10/17/2024 804710196.00Regular 0.00 12619 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 73.500.00 12620 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 122.500.00 10091 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC 10/17/2024 804711109,301.35Regular 0.00 67920 Invoice 10/17/2024 2022-107 STR MAINT, CATCH BASIN, VEN… 109,301.350.00 11317 COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT INC 10/17/2024 8047125,250.00Regular 0.00 COMB-05-24-640…Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 5,250.000.00 10106 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 10/17/2024 8047131,900.00Regular 0.00 2024-43 Invoice 10/17/2024 FY 2024 CONTRACT (NEW CLAIMS) STORM… 1,900.000.00 10110 COX COMMUNICATIONS 10/17/2024 8047142,370.53Regular 0.00 3601 10/01/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 TELECOM SERVICES - ALL FACILITIES OCT 2,307.730.00 6701 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 CABLE SERVICES 9/27 - 10/26 CITY CLERK 62.800.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 10/17/2024 8047159,235.34Regular 0.00 10970 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL MONTHLY SERVICE OCT 5,485.000.00 3339 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8217 COMM… 498.490.00 3340 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8858 PAC 10… 413.600.00 3342 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8939 COMM… 368.490.00 3343 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE MAYOR'S LUNCHEON… 587.190.00 3344 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8733 COMM… 498.490.00 3345 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7289 COMM… 1,015.590.00 3346 Invoice 10/17/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7711 COMM… 368.490.00 11310 DAWN ATHUR 10/17/2024 80471690.00Regular 0.00
2003192.021 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND ZUMBA GOLD #12770 90.000.00 THB001154 DEBRA D ROSE 10/17/2024 804717818.22Regular 0.00 10/09-10/11 Invoice 10/17/2024 EXP REIMB CJIPIA 10/09/24 - 10/11/24 818.220.00 10123 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 10/17/2024 804718271.00Regular 0.00 16982723 Invoice 10/17/2024 2022-030 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL OCT S… 40.000.00 16982725 Invoice 10/17/2024 2022-030 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL OCT … 35.000.00 16982726 Invoice 10/17/2024 2022-030 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL OCT L… 196.000.00 11315 DISTINCTIVE ENVIRONMENT 10/17/2024 8047192,550.00Regular 0.00 RESB-11-23-62260 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 2,550.000.00 11311 DULCE CRUZ 10/17/2024 804720250.00Regular 0.00
2003196.021 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8217 250.000.00 11192 EDWARD L WHITTING, JR 10/17/2024 804721200.00Regular 0.00 090624-01 Invoice 10/17/2024 PIANO MAINTENANCE PERMIT 8539 PAC 9… 200.000.00 10137 EL TORO WATER DISTRICT 10/17/2024 804722134,539.06Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 10 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 24-07 Invoice 10/17/2024 WATER SERVICES PARKS, SLOPES, LFSP JUL… 35,380.440.00 24-08 Invoice 10/17/2024 WATER SERVICES PARKS, SLOPES, LFSP AU… 49,140.540.00 24-09 Invoice 10/17/2024 WATER SERVICES PARKS, SLOPES, LFSP SEP… 50,018.080.00 11314 ENSEMBLE MUSIC SCHOOLS CA LLC 10/17/2024 804723175.00Regular 0.00 12492 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87.500.00 12495 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87.500.00 11223 GEOCON WEST INC 10/17/2024 8047249,155.00Regular 0.00 724070061 Invoice 10/17/2024 2022-124 TRABUCO REHAB / ASPHALT TRA… 9,155.000.00 10195 IP VIDEO SPECIALISTS 10/17/2024 804725199.00Regular 0.00 7739 Invoice 10/17/2024 SKATE PARK WEBCAM NOV 2024 199.000.00 10203 JAMEY CLARK INC 10/17/2024 804726257.09Regular 0.00 75559 Invoice 10/17/2024 2024-047 STOCK ORDERED 6 SOAP DISPE… 257.090.00 THB001263 JENNIFER M MANSUR 10/17/2024 80472737.89Regular 0.00 10/10/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 EXP REIMB APA CONFERENCE PARKING &… 37.890.00 11316 JOE NARVAEZ 10/17/2024 804728750.00Regular 0.00
RESB-11-23-62405 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 750.000.00 10429 KAYUGA SOLUTION INC 10/17/2024 80472925,000.00Regular 0.00 INV-LF-AMP-009 Invoice 10/17/2024 ANNUAL LICENSE/MAINT FOR IRIS 9/1/24 -… 25,000.000.00 10223 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 10/17/2024 804730939.80Regular 0.00 296142464 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER 2B 44.300.00 296142467 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER POLICE SERVI… 59.080.00 296142470 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER CITY CLERK 65.930.00 296142471 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER 2A 98.160.00 296142561 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER BUILDING CO… 142.830.00 296142847 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER SENIOR CENT… 288.530.00 296143098 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER 1A 164.160.00 296143196 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER SPORTS PARK 42.140.00 296232829 Invoice 10/17/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER COMMUNITY … 34.670.00 10224 KONICA MINOLTA PREMIER FINANCE 10/17/2024 8047311,011.43Regular 0.00 83094116 Invoice 10/17/2024 LEASE FOR 8 KONICA COPIERS OCT 1,011.430.00 10655 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES INC 10/17/2024 8047328,788.26Regular 0.00 2405.12-004 Invoice 10/17/2024 KOSMONT RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS SEP 8,788.260.00 11313 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS CHTD 10/17/2024 8047338,585.00Regular 0.00 788073001 Invoice 10/17/2024 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE… 8,585.000.00 10536 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 10/17/2024 8047344,056.04Regular 0.00 32512953 Invoice 10/17/2024 OPERATING SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 2024 4,056.040.00 11050 POWER PROFESSIONAL CLEANERS CORP 10/17/2024 80473516.00Regular 0.00 YQ-07-021792 Invoice 10/17/2024 STARS UNIFORM 16.000.00 10311 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 10/17/2024 8047363,302.25Regular 0.00 0103961 Invoice 10/17/2024 BAKE TOLEDO WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS… 3,302.250.00 11044 RONALD A SAGONA 10/17/2024 80473790.00Regular 0.00 108352 Invoice 10/17/2024 2024-009 BACKFLOW TESTING 2 LOCATIO… 90.000.00 11177 S MIRACLES LLC 10/17/2024 804738500.00Regular 0.00 06/21/2024 Invoice 06/30/2024 TASTE OF LAKE FOREST - INCENTIVE PAYM… 500.000.00 10319 SAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 10/17/2024 8047398,460.00Regular 0.00 4902 Invoice 10/17/2024 CEQA CONSULTING SDP 04-24-5698 (IMI) … 8,460.000.00 11312 SAKEZEN LLC 10/17/2024 804740749.84Regular 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 11 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount UP 08-24-5726 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND PLANNING DEPOSIT 749.840.00 10611 SCOTT VOIGTS 10/17/2024 80474136.98Regular 0.00
09/24/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 MILEAGE REIMB - S VOIGHTS 7/1 - 9/24 36.980.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10/17/2024 8047422,055.58Regular 0.00 1549 10/03/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 PORTOLA PARK UTILITIES SEP 145.320.00 5146 10/03/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 STREET LIGHT UTILITIES SEP CIVIC CENTER 69.240.00 6551 09/30/2024 Invoice 10/17/2024 PARK UTILITIES SEP 2024 1,841.020.00 10340 SPECTRUM SPECIALTIES 10/17/2024 804743125.84Regular 0.00 37965 Invoice 10/17/2024 ADDITIONAL TROPHY FOR 4TH OF JULY PA… 125.840.00 10347 SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES INC 10/17/2024 8047449,133.33Regular 0.00 18228 Invoice 10/17/2024 2023-022 PRESS WASH/STEAM CLEAN/GR… 9,133.330.00 10641 THE LOFTCRAFTERS INC 10/17/2024 8047451,560.00Regular 0.00 RESB-07-24-64441 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 1,560.000.00 11318 THE PICKLEBALL HAVEN LLC 10/17/2024 804746744.06Regular 0.00 UP 08-24-5725 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND UP APPLICATION DEPOSIT 744.060.00 10363 THE PRINTERY INC 10/17/2024 804747467.25Regular 0.00 142771 Invoice 10/17/2024 SMP POSTCARDS 467.250.00
10986 THE STELLRECHT COMPANY INC 10/17/2024 8047486,750.00Regular 0.00 COMB-04-24-634…Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 6,750.000.00 10649 TOLL BROS INC 10/17/2024 80474986,517.90Regular 0.00 RESB-08-23-61328 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 9,801.270.00 RESB-09-23-61669 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,286.300.00 RESB-09-23-61671 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,286.300.00 RESB-09-23-61743 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,768.970.00 RESB-09-23-61744 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,768.970.00 RESB-09-23-61745 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,679.690.00 RESB-09-23-61746 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,679.690.00 RESB-11-23-62308 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,286.300.00 RESB-11-23-62309 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,280.720.00 RESB-11-23-62310 Invoice 10/17/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 8,679.690.00 11309 US CAD HOLDINGS LLC 10/17/2024 8047501,722.60Regular 0.00 INV65591 Invoice 10/17/2024 BLUEBEAM REVU ANNL S/W LICENSES FOR… 1,722.600.00 10506 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 10/17/2024 80475123,571.00Regular 0.00 219943 Invoice 10/17/2024 TREE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 9/1 - 9/15 23,571.000.00 10942 YUKA GARRETT 10/17/2024 804752283.50Regular 0.00
12685 Invoice 10/17/2024 SUMMER 2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 283.500.00 10899 A TOUCH OF LOVE WORKS 10/24/2024 804753650.00Regular 0.00 2003206.021 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7399 650.000.00 11232 ABBA TERMITE & PEST CONTROL INC 10/24/2024 804754470.00Regular 0.00 19537F Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-061 BEES REMOVED SEP 2024 SERR… 235.000.00 19818F Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-061 BEE SWARM REMOVED OCT 20… 235.000.00 10001 ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC 10/24/2024 80475547,249.81Regular 0.00 2410007-IN Invoice 10/24/2024 ADOBE ACROBAT/MEDIA EDITING SUBSCR… 16,424.030.00 2410031-IN Invoice 10/24/2024 PC REFRESH FOR 15 STAFF FY25 30,825.780.00 10852 ACCESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 10/24/2024 8047564,247.94Regular 0.00 16713-4 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-048 SCOREBOARD LIGHTS OCT HERO… 3,785.190.00 16715 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-048 INSTALL QUAD OUTLET OCT LFSP 207.750.00 16797 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-048 FLAG POLE LIGHTING OCT VETE… 255.000.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 12 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 10017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 10/24/2024 80475722,275.07Regular 0.00 95871 Invoice 10/24/2024 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 9/15 - 9/28 22,275.070.00 11324 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE10/24/2024 804758650.00Regular 0.00 APACA-05102024…Invoice 10/24/2024 APA CONFERENCE SEP 2024 - G ACKERMAN 650.000.00 THB004928 AMY LEWIS 10/24/2024 80475972.00Regular 0.00
INV2069700 Invoice 10/24/2024 EXP REIMB SMARTSHEET SUBSCRIPTION 72.000.00 10044 AT&T CALNET3 10/24/2024 804760459.71Regular 0.00
000022354964 Invoice 10/24/2024 UTILITIES SEPT PARK 60.840.00 000022401380 Invoice 10/24/2024 UTILITIES AUG+SEPT MPS 309.160.00 000022407649 Invoice 10/24/2024 UTILITIES 6189 SEPT PARK 89.710.00 10502 BKF ENGINEERS 10/24/2024 8047613,397.00Regular 0.00 24100747 Invoice 10/24/2024 2021-101 LEFT TURN DESIGN SEP LOS ALI… 3,397.000.00 11253 BLUE RASTER LLC 10/24/2024 8047626,920.00Regular 0.00 8807 Invoice 10/24/2024 ASSET MANAGEMENT GIS WORKFLOWS S… 6,920.000.00 10062 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 10/24/2024 80476317,114.89Regular 0.00 9059403 Invoice 10/24/2024 PUMP MOTOR REPLACEMENT AUG BORR… 4,203.890.00 9065821 Invoice 10/24/2024 2023-083 IRRIGATION REPAIRS AUG LFSP 2,746.000.00 9100282 Invoice 10/24/2024 2023-083 PLANT MATERIAL SEP LFSP 5,365.000.00 9100311 Invoice 10/24/2024 2023-083 INSTALL MULCH SEP LFSP 4,800.000.00 10967 BRUCE E MIHELICH INC 10/24/2024 8047643,227.63Regular 0.00 W 61936 Invoice 10/24/2024 FORD MAVERICK LIGHT BAR & TRUCK BED… 3,227.630.00 10971 C2 COLLABORATIVE 10/24/2024 8047651,950.00Regular 0.00 301836 Invoice 10/24/2024 RENOVATION SEPT BAKER RANCH DOG PA… 1,950.000.00 10074 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT 10/24/2024 804766147.70Regular 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 REMIT ID 200000002413681 SDU/TRIBAL … 147.700.00 10079 CALPERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM 10/24/2024 804767238.85Regular 0.00 15458277 Invoice 10/24/2024 EE CONT PPE 10/25/2024 238.850.00 10095 CITY OF LAKE FOREST SUNSHINE CLUB 10/24/2024 804768162.00Regular 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 EE CONT PPE 10/11/2024 162.000.00 THB004967 CONNOR MUSLER 10/24/2024 80476964.33Regular 0.00 10/14/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 EXP REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR 2024 A… 64.330.00 10107 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 10/24/2024 804770413.63Regular 0.00 121313822 Invoice 10/24/2024 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES NOW (BACK-E… 413.630.00 10109 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER TAX 10/24/2024 8047712,744.00Regular 0.00 SH 69464 Invoice 10/24/2024 AFIS FINGERPRINT SEP 2024 2,605.000.00 STTM002449 Invoice 10/24/2024 800 MHZ MONTHLY MAINTENANCE JUL 139.000.00 10143 ERIC WINTER 10/24/2024 804772816.00Regular 0.00
6061 Invoice 10/24/2024 AV SERVICES FOR CITY COUNCIL 10/1 & 10… 816.000.00 10163 FLOCK GROUP INC 10/24/2024 8047731,300.00Regular 0.00 INV-49150 Invoice 10/24/2024 REPLACEMENT CAMERA#44 NB GLENN R… 1,300.000.00 11321 HEAVENLY PLASTIC SURGERY 10/24/2024 80477410,000.00Regular 0.00 COMB-03-23-592…Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 10,000.000.00 11322 HENRY NUNEZ 10/24/2024 804775562.50Regular 0.00
COMB-06-24-641…Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 562.500.00 11323 HERITAGE FAMILY OF COMPANIES 10/24/2024 8047761,839.50Regular 0.00 SDP 02-23-5600 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND DEPOSIT (23982 REMME RIDGE) 1,839.500.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 13 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 10184 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 10/24/2024 8047772,500.00Regular 0.00 SIN043697 Invoice 10/24/2024 CANNABIS TESTING LAB MGMT SEP 2024 2,500.000.00 11326 ILA DARAFSHANDAR 10/24/2024 804778195.00Regular 0.00 2003208.021 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8691 195.000.00 10454 INNOVATIVE CLEANING SERVICES INC 10/24/2024 80477932,383.63Regular 0.00 31138 Invoice 10/24/2024 2022-027 MONTHLY JANITORIAL SVCS SEP… 32,383.630.00 10196 IRV SEAVER MOTORCYCLES 10/24/2024 8047802,385.39Regular 0.00 20242133 Invoice 10/24/2024 2022 BMW #39859 MAINTENANCE SERVI… 853.110.00 20242202 Invoice 10/24/2024 2020 BMW #14739 MAINTENANCE SERVI… 1,532.280.00 11320 J&Z CONSTRUCTION REMODELING INC 10/24/2024 804781600.00Regular 0.00 RESB-05-24-63816 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 600.000.00 10203 JAMEY CLARK INC 10/24/2024 804782366.56Regular 0.00 75596 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-047 REPLC DRINKING FOUNTAIN BU… 180.000.00 75597 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-047 FOUNTAIN REPAIR OCT 2024 BA… 186.560.00 10794 JEFF ERTZ CONSTRUCTION 10/24/2024 8047833,000.00Regular 0.00 RESB-03-24-63167 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 3,000.000.00 11325 JEHOVAH WITNESSES 10/24/2024 804784250.00Regular 0.00 2003200.021 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7223 250.000.00 10220 KIDDER MATHEWS OF CALIFORNIA 10/24/2024 80478557,154.67Regular 0.00 KMC-112830 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-038 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SEPT … 57,154.670.00 10225 KWIKEY S LOCK AND KEY INC 10/24/2024 8047861,372.00Regular 0.00 101024 Invoice 10/24/2024 PUBLIC WORKS CABINET LOCK/KEYS OCT C… 994.450.00 101224 Invoice 10/24/2024 ELECTRICAL PANEL KEYS OCT 2024 BORRE… 161.550.00 101424 Invoice 10/24/2024 OFFICE LOCKOUT SERVICE/KEY OCT 2024 L… 216.000.00 10232 LGC GEOTECHNICAL INC 10/24/2024 8047875,227.75Regular 0.00 01-21608 Invoice 10/24/2024 2022-123 GEOTECH REVIEW AUG MEAD… 2,051.500.00 01-21609 Invoice 10/24/2024 2022-123 GEOTECH REVIEW AUG ASCENS… 825.000.00 01-21727 Invoice 10/24/2024 2022-123 GEOTECH REVIEW SEPT MEAD… 1,938.750.00 01-21728 Invoice 10/24/2024 2022-123 GEOTECH REVIEW SEPT ASCENS… 412.500.00 10468 MISSIONSQUARE 10/24/2024 80478811,022.17Regular 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 DEFERRED COMP ACCR 303669 PPE 10/11… 11,022.170.00 10250 MONOGRAM MAGIC 10/24/2024 804789334.46Regular 0.00 13869 Invoice 10/24/2024 PROTECTIVE WEAR CAPS FOR INSPECTIONS 334.460.00 11313 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS CHTD 10/24/2024 80479023,661.80Regular 0.00 788073002 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-045 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLA… 23,661.800.00 10273 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 10/24/2024 804791243.00Regular 0.00 84425340 Invoice 10/24/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL/DRUG & TB … 189.000.00 84504448 Invoice 10/24/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL TEST SEP 54.000.00 10276 ONWARD ENGINEERING 10/24/2024 8047926,612.50Regular 0.00 7699 Invoice 10/24/2024 DESIGN - LAKE FOREST DRIVE RESURFACI… 6,612.500.00 10577 ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH UNDERWRITERS10/24/2024 804793209.00Regular 0.00 2003207.021 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8939 209.000.00 10280 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE 10/24/2024 804794129.11Regular 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 LOF NO. 30-2019-01097622-CL-CL-CJC PPE… 129.110.00 10325 SHELTERCLEAN SERVICES INC 10/24/2024 8047954,489.00Regular 0.00 788852 Invoice 10/24/2024 2024-042 BUS SHELTER MAINTAINCE SEPT 4,489.000.00 10329 SO CAL INDUSTRIES 10/24/2024 804796114.28Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 14 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 711966 Invoice 10/24/2024 PORTALET RENTALS 10/1 - 10/28 114.280.00 11319 SOCAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION 10/24/2024 804797500.00Regular 0.00 COMB-07-24-644…Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 500.000.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10/24/2024 80479819,279.73Regular 0.00 3611 10/14/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 PARK UTILITIES PARKS, MPS, LFSP, BUS SH… 13,117.910.00 8114 10/08/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 UTILITIES SEP CIVIC CENTER 6,161.820.00 10338 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHREDDING 10/24/2024 804799835.00Regular 0.00 265500 Invoice 10/24/2024 ID THEFT PREVENTION PAPER SHREDDING 835.000.00 11327 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONDEMNATION DEPOSITS FUND10/24/2024 804800337,000.00Regular 0.00 APN 614-021-34 Invoice 10/24/2024 CONDEMNATION FUNDS DEPOSIT/JERON… 337,000.000.00 10505 STUDIO TWO BLACK DIAMOND PRINTING & GRAPHICS10/24/2024 804801210.12Regular 0.00 101827 Invoice 10/24/2024 BUSINESS CARDS 140.080.00
101837 Invoice 10/24/2024 BUSINESS CARDS S VOIGTS 70.040.00 10359 THE GAS COMPANY 10/24/2024 804802602.35Regular 0.00 2943 10/09/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 UTILITIES SEP LFSP 132.550.00 9109 10/08/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES SEP 469.800.00 10641 THE LOFTCRAFTERS INC 10/24/2024 8048033,690.00Regular 0.00 RESB-06-24-64312 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 2,220.000.00 RESB-08-24-64899 Invoice 10/24/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 1,470.000.00 10364 THE UPS STORE 0026 10/24/2024 804804225.00Regular 0.00 TCLF0920240026 Invoice 10/24/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT LIVESCAN FINGERPRIN… 225.000.00 10419 TRANSPERFECT GLOBAL INC 10/24/2024 804805819.00Regular 0.00 3150764 Invoice 10/24/2024 TRANSLATION SERVICES 819.000.00 10595 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC 10/24/2024 8048061,570.00Regular 0.00 20244905 Invoice 10/24/2024 ROCKFIELD BLVD MEDIAN (24S09) AUG 20… 1,570.000.00 10391 US BANK PARS 10/24/2024 8048072,956.45Regular 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 PARS CONT PPE 10/11/2024 2,956.450.00 10392 US DEPT OF TREASURY 10/24/2024 804808950.62Regular 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 AGENCY TRACKING WG2122418 PPE 10/1… 950.620.00 10405 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 10/24/2024 8048092,311.47Regular 0.00 8690611272439 Invoice 10/24/2024 CITY VEHICLE FUEL SEP 2024 2,311.470.00 10506 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 10/24/2024 80481028,848.00Regular 0.00 220391 Invoice 10/24/2024 TREE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 9/16 - 9/30 28,848.000.00 11232 ABBA TERMITE & PEST CONTROL INC 10/31/2024 804811330.00Regular 0.00 16893F Invoice 10/31/2024 2024-061 2 IRRIG BOXES BEES REMOVD JU… 235.000.00 19968F Invoice 10/31/2024 2024-061 BEE SWARM OCT TRABUCO RD 95.000.00 10006 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 10/31/2024 804812226.89Regular 0.00 1091829944 Invoice 10/31/2024 SECURITY QUARTERLY SERVICE HEROES 10… 155.970.00 1091974417 Invoice 10/31/2024 SKATE PARK SECURITY 10/19 - 11/18 70.920.00 10009 AGE WELL SENIOR SERVICES 10/31/2024 8048134,748.24Regular 0.00 0924 Invoice 10/31/2024 AWSS OCTA SMP SENIOR TRANSPORTATI… 4,748.240.00 10019 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES 10/31/2024 8048142,998.00Regular 0.00 2790781 Invoice 10/31/2024 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE - CONCERT IN … 1,497.000.00 2849156 Invoice 10/31/2024 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE - SPOOKTACU… 1,501.000.00 10026 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO 10/31/2024 8048151,010.36Regular 0.00 D766551 Invoice 10/31/2024 OPTIONAL INSURANCE SEP 2024 505.180.00 Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 15 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount D775971 Invoice 10/31/2024 OPTIONAL INSURANCE OCT 2024 505.180.00 10043 AT&T 10/31/2024 8048161,295.65Regular 0.00
3961554900 Invoice 10/31/2024 PRIMARY INTERNET OCT 2024 CIVIC CENT… 1,295.650.00 10044 AT&T CALNET3 10/31/2024 804817408.89Regular 0.00
000022447693 Invoice 10/31/2024 ANALOG PHONE LINES SEP CIVIC CENTER 408.890.00 10846 BOGART CONSTRUCTION INC 10/31/2024 80481810,000.00Regular 0.00 COMB-09-23-615…Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 10,000.000.00 10479 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAGUNA BEACH 10/31/2024 804819900.00Regular 0.00 2003223.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7829 900.000.00 10075 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 10/31/2024 8048205,424.80Regular 0.00 9508024 Invoice 10/31/2024 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SEP 5,424.800.00 11332 CAMILA FIELD 10/31/2024 804821115.00Regular 0.00
2003220.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND SUPER SOCCER STARS 12731 115.000.00 11337 CATALINA MUNOZ 10/31/2024 804822700.00Regular 0.00 2003226.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7443 700.000.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 10/31/2024 8048232,783.87Regular 0.00 3338 Invoice 10/31/2024 EXTRA CLEANING FOR BASEBALL NCS TOU… 280.000.00 3341 Invoice 10/31/2024 EXTRA CLEANING FOR BASEBALL NCS TOU… 280.000.00 3347 Invoice 10/31/2024 EXTRA RESTROOM CLEANING FOR TOURN… 280.000.00 3348 Invoice 10/31/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8865 COMM… 368.490.00 3349 Invoice 10/31/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7443 COMM… 926.890.00 3350 Invoice 10/31/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7711 COMM… 368.490.00 3351 Invoice 10/31/2024 EXTRA CLEANNG FOR BASEBALL NCS TOU… 280.000.00 10134 ECONOMICS INC 10/31/2024 80482412,871.31Regular 0.00 2021-22.39 Invoice 10/31/2024 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE & … 7,599.980.00 2022.30 Invoice 10/31/2024 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE SEP 5,271.330.00 10489 ECS IMAGING INC 10/31/2024 804825350.00Regular 0.00 19156 Invoice 10/31/2024 PAF DIGITIZATION CHANGE ORDER - VOID … 350.000.00 11333 EVANGELICAL FORMOSAN CHURCH OF IRVINE 10/31/2024 80482650.00Regular 0.00 2003224.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8984 50.000.00 10170 GMU GEOTECHNICAL INC 10/31/2024 8048272,735.00Regular 0.00 66309 Invoice 10/31/2024 2022-122 SIFI REVIEW JUN 1,000.000.00 66792 Invoice 10/31/2024 3RD PARTY REVIEW PORTOLA NE PARCEL … 1,625.000.00 66808 Invoice 10/31/2024 EIR REVIEW 26200 ENTERPRISE - VIBRATI… 110.000.00 10183 HILLYARD LOS ANGELES 10/31/2024 804828232.05Regular 0.00 605639088 Invoice 10/31/2024 GYM FLOOR CLEANING SUPPLIES 232.050.00 10194 INTERWEST CONSULTING 10/31/2024 804829101,872.50Regular 0.00 516414 Invoice 10/31/2024 2023-051 LAKE FOREST REHAB & TRABUC… 36,055.000.00 631657 Invoice 10/31/2024 2023-051 ASCENSION CEMETERY & TRAB… 34,813.750.00 731785 Invoice 10/31/2024 2023-051 ASCENSION CEMETERY & TRAB… 31,003.750.00 10197 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 10/31/2024 804830105,102.96Regular 0.00 24-09 Invoice 10/31/2024 WATER SERVICES SEP CC, LFSP, MP, SLOPE… 105,102.960.00 10200 JAMES L BLACKBURN 10/31/2024 804831411.74Regular 0.00 33121 Invoice 10/31/2024 CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTICES & VEHICLE… 411.740.00 10495 KONICA MINOLTA 10/31/2024 804832247.42Regular 0.00 45755730 Invoice 10/31/2024 LEASE FOR COMMUNITY CENTER COPIER (… 247.420.00 11336 LARKIE DAM 10/31/2024 804833200.00Regular 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 16 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 2003225.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8865 200.000.00 10236 LSA ASSOCIATES INC 10/31/2024 804834114,925.25Regular 0.00 196167 Invoice 10/31/2024 IPT EIR AUG-SEP 2024 73,157.750.00 196168 Invoice 10/31/2024 WESTERN REALCO EIR THROUGH AUG 2024 41,767.500.00 11330 MICHELLE WOOD 10/31/2024 80483513.00Regular 0.00
2003212.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND BUNCO 12667 13.000.00 11329 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER 10/31/2024 80483631.00Regular 0.00 1202400000245 Invoice 10/31/2024 RECORDING OF A CITY DOCUMENT 31.000.00 11339 PEGASUS REMODELING, INC. 10/31/2024 8048375,100.00Regular 0.00 RESB-11-23-62378 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 5,100.000.00 11328 QUINN COMPANY 10/31/2024 80483822,780.27Regular 0.00 Q25302 Invoice 10/31/2024 SCISSOR LIFT PURCHASE SEP 2024 22,780.270.00 10311 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 10/31/2024 8048393,302.25Regular 0.00 0104191 Invoice 10/31/2024 BAKE TOLEDO WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS… 3,302.250.00 10325 SHELTERCLEAN SERVICES INC 10/31/2024 804840294.00Regular 0.00 788853 Invoice 10/31/2024 2024-042 BUS SHELTER REPAIR SEP 294.000.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10/31/2024 804841122,642.57Regular 0.00 3106 10/03/2024 Invoice 10/31/2024 CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES SEPT 2024 113,643.100.00 5025 10/15/2024 Invoice 10/31/2024 STREET LIGHT UTILITIES SEP 2024 8,999.470.00 10337 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 10/31/2024 8048423,829.87Regular 0.00 5190701 Invoice 10/31/2024 PUBLIC NOTICES: PLANNING APP REIMB, C… 3,829.870.00 10340 SPECTRUM SPECIALTIES 10/31/2024 8048433,155.86Regular 0.00 37982 Invoice 10/31/2024 BACK PACK GIVEAWAY SPOOKTACULAR 2,279.150.00 37983 Invoice 10/31/2024 STAFF SPECIAL EVENT SHIRTS 876.710.00 11338 SRI PRANAVA MUDHRA DANCE ACADEMY 10/31/2024 804844500.00Regular 0.00 2003227.021 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8858 500.000.00 11340 STERLING CONSULTING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.10/31/2024 8048453,600.00Regular 0.00 RESB-09-23-61555 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 3,600.000.00 10345 SUPER BIRTHDAY INC 10/31/2024 8048461,750.00Regular 0.00 30587 Invoice 10/31/2024 MINI TRAINS FOR 2024 TREE LIGHTING 1,750.000.00 11341 TERRY & LORI DANA 10/31/2024 804847600.00Regular 0.00 RESB-05-24-63793 Invoice 10/31/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 600.000.00 10362 THE PET ADOPTION CENTER OF 10/31/2024 8048481,583.33Regular 0.00 1020 Invoice 10/31/2024 PET ADOPTION CENTER SERVICES SEP 2024 1,583.330.00 10595 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC 10/31/2024 8048493,312.50Regular 0.00 20245426 Invoice 10/31/2024 ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD MEDIAN (24S09) 3,312.500.00 10408 WESTAMERICA COMMUNICATIONS 10/31/2024 804850653.30Regular 0.00 366031 Invoice 10/31/2024 PARK OUTREACH SIGNS 653.300.00 10932 WEX HEALTH INC 10/31/2024 8048511.40Regular 0.00
0000033807 Invoice 10/31/2024 COBRA PAYMENT OCT 2024 1.400.00 5,783,703.31Total Regular: 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 17 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Payment Type: Bank Draft
10076 CALPERS EMPLOYER SVCS 10/10/2024 DFT000025373,323.47Bank Draft 0.00 09-27-2024 Invoice 10/10/2024 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PPE 09/27/… 73,323.470.00 10080 CALPERS HEALTH BENEFITS BRANCH 10/10/2024 DFT0000254101,221.78Bank Draft 0.00 100000017679575 Invoice 10/10/2024 HEALTH INSURANCE FOR SEPTEMBER 2024 101,221.780.00 10004 ADP 10/11/2024 DFT00002552,888.04Bank Draft 0.00
672515845 Invoice 10/11/2024 PROCESSING CHG FOR PE 9/11, 9/13, 9/19… 2,888.040.00 10004 ADP 10/11/2024 DFT00002561,627.15Bank Draft 0.00
672517119 Invoice 10/11/2024 WORKFORCE NOW HCM PE 9/16/24 1,627.150.00 10004 ADP 10/11/2024 DFT00002571,699.60Bank Draft 0.00
672517444 Invoice 10/11/2024 ADP TIME AND ATTENDANCE 1,699.600.00 10076 CALPERS EMPLOYER SVCS 10/24/2024 DFT000025858,741.32Bank Draft 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/24/2024 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PPE 10/11/… 58,741.320.00 239,501.36Total Bank Draft: 0.00
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
CountPayment Type
Bank Code OP Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
269
3 1
6 0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 279 0.00
Payment
5,784,203.31
1,425.35
-500.00
239,501.36
0.00 6,024,630.02
Payable
Count
435
3 0
6 0
444
Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
11/12/2024 11:34:51 AM Page 18 of 19
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Bank Code: PR-Payroll
Payment Type: Bank Draft
10005 ADP TAX FINANCIAL SVC 10/04/2024 DFT0000251100,890.60Bank Draft 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/04/2024 PAYROLL TAXES FOR PPE 09/27/2024 100,890.600.00 10004 ADP 10/04/2024 DFT0000252428,620.73Bank Draft 0.00 09/27/2024 Invoice 10/04/2024 DIRECT DEPOSIT ACH PPE 09/27/2024 428,620.730.00 10004 ADP 10/18/2024 DFT0000259267,010.74Bank Draft 0.00 10/11/2024 DD Invoice 10/18/2024 DIRECT DEPOSIT ACH PPE 10/11/2024 267,010.740.00 10005 ADP TAX FINANCIAL SVC 10/18/2024 DFT000026065,148.54Bank Draft 0.00 10/11/2024 Invoice 10/18/2024 PAYROLL TAXES FOR PPE 10/11/2024 65,148.540.00 10005 ADP TAX FINANCIAL SVC 10/31/2024 DFT000026765,340.96Bank Draft 0.00 10/25/2024 A Invoice 10/31/2024 PAYROLL TAXES FOR PPE 10/25/2024 65,340.960.00 927,011.57Total Bank Draft: 0.00
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
CountPayment Type
Bank Code PR Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
0 0
0 5
0 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
5 0.00
Payment
0.00 0.00
0.00 927,011.57
0.00 927,011.57
Payable
Count
0 0
0 5
0 5
Check Report Date Range: 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2024
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
269
3 1
11 0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 284 0.00
5,784,203.31
1,425.35
-500.00
1,166,512.93
0.00 6,951,641.59
435
3 0
11 0
449
Fund Name AmountPeriod
Fund Summary
999 Pooled Cash 6,951,641.5910/2024
6,951,641.59
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NON-ARTERIAL STREETS
ASPHALT REPAIRS ZONE D (24S01A)
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve contract documents for construction of Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A).
2. Award a contract in the amount of $2,257,700.00, to LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp.
3. Reject all other bids received and authorize return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp.
4. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs, Zone D (24S01A) would repair and extend the life of asphalt pavement within Zone D. Zone D encompasses the residential and commercial areas from Trabuco Road to Portola Parkway between Lake Forest Drive and the City of Irvine boundary (Attachment 1). The project was advertised on August 15, 2023. On October 3, 2024, the City received seven (7) bids for this project ranging from $2,257,700 to $3,289,055. The apparent low bidder is LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp. (“LCR”). The total project cost to construct, inspect, provide construction support, and provide contingency for the project is estimated to be $2,575,000.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached Construction Contract with LCR (Attachment 3). The signed cover sheet of the bid documents is provided. (Attachment 4) This project is funded by Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (SB1) Funds. Sufficient funds for the Zone D Asphalt Repairs are available in the City’s Annual Street Resurfacing and Slurry Seal program.
BACKGROUND:
The City has an established annual street maintenance program to slurry seal and asphalt overlay public streets. As a requirement of OCTA’s Measure M funding, the City utilizes a pavement management system to evaluate and score the condition of each street biannually utilizing a Pavement Condition Index (“PCI”). The pavement management system provides recommendations to maintain a street’s condition based on the PCI rating. The overall PCI for the entire city is 77 or rated “Good.” Typically, the City performs slurry seal applications in seven-year intervals and resurfaces streets on an as-needed basis with available funding. As part of the slurry seal program, staff also identify locations on the streets within zones that require structural repairs in addition to the slurry seal. The contractor would perform these localized repairs prior to the application of the slurry seal. This best management practice reduces expensive reconstruction costs by extending the useful life of the pavement without the need for full resurfacing of the asphalt.
Zone D area is historically the largest zone and has grown with the addition of the Baker Ranch neighborhoods. Additionally, fiber optic companies are micro- trenching throughout the city and are moving to Zone D within the next three months. Considering these factors, staff decided to approach Zone D differently by dividing the work into two phases: repairing asphalt to preserve structural integrity of existing pavement first and applying slurry seal after fiber optic installation is complete. Staff has included a project location map for the City Council’s reference (Attachment 1).
DISCUSSION:
The proposed Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D project would spot repair streets, adjust utilities and replace traffic striping, markings, and legends wherever disturbed. The proposed project would approximately repair 600,000 square feet (“sf”) with 2” grind and AC pavement, 8000 sf with 4” grind and AC pavement, and deep dig outs as needed based on the field conditions to maintain structural integrity of the existing pavement. Upon approval of the award of the contract, staff anticipate project construction to begin in late 2024 or early 2025.
The construction contract specifies 50 working days to complete the work with an anticipated project completion in the second quarter of 2025.
On October 3, 2024, the City received seven (7) bids for this project ranging from $2,257,700 to $3,289,055. The engineer’s estimate for this project is $2,005,200.
Staff reviewed LCR’s bid package for completeness. In addition, the electronic bidding system the City utilizes eliminates mathematical errors in the bids, therefore, the submitted bid results, including the total of the project, are provided in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Bid Results
Contracting Firm OpenGov Verified total for Zone D
LCR Earthwork and Engineering
Corp.
$2,257,700
Onyx Paving Company, Inc. $2,422,000
All American Asphalt $2,439,888
Hardy and Harper, Inc. $2,473,000
PALP Inc. dba Excel Paving
Company
$2,598,476
Copp Contracting, Inc. $3,029,220
R.J. Noble Company $3,289,055
After analysis of the bids received, staff determined that LCR Earthwork and Engineering Corp. was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for this project.
Recently, LCR completed projects in the cities of Industry, Orange, and Bellflower. Staff conducted a reference check that indicated LCR is a responsible contractor (Attachment 2). The Finance Department prepared the contract which LCR subsequently executed (Attachment 3). The City Attorney reviewed and approved the contract as to form. The contract bid amount as determined by the estimated quantities is $2,257,700.
Per Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 3.13.085, the City Manager may approve additional work not-to-exceed 10% of the final contract amount ($225,770). The contract plans and specifications are not attached to the agenda; however, they are available for review on City's digital bid advertising platform, OpenGov.com. Staff have attached the approved signed title sheet for the project (Attachment 4).
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total project cost to construct, inspect, provide construction support, and provide contingency for the project is estimated to be $2,575,000. Approving the recommended action would award a contract to LCR in the amount of $2,257,700. The 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan budget currently has sufficient Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (SB1) Funds for the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Location Map
2. Contractor’s Reference Check
3. Contract with LCR
4. Signed Title Sheet
Initiated By: Nazila Mokarram, Principal Civil Engineer Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Apparent Low Bidder: Contact #1: Contact #2: Contact #3:
LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp. City of Industry City of Orange City of Bellflower Name Chris Lum Salvador Munoz Jerry Stock
Phone No. or Email (562)896-2260 (714)744-5547 (714) 448-5835
QUESTION RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE
1. Title and type of project 21-22 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation; Fullerton Rd ReconstructionAnnual Concrete Replacement FY23-24Reconstruct City Owned Parking Lot
2. Contract Amount $1,284,000; $1,862,000 $1,322,000 $478,000
3. Approximate duration 60 working days; 90 working days 90 days NA
4. Actual or estimated project completion date Nov. 2023; April 2024 June 2024 September 2023
5. Quality of the work Very good Good Very good
6. Similarity of the Project Very good Good Good
7. Contractor’s relationship with agency representatives Very good Good Very good
8. Claims or stop notices No No No
9. Change order requests yes, generated by agency yes, generated by agency yes, due to unexpected conditions
10. Agency’s desire to have contractor bid on future projects yes yes yes
11. Additional Comments Very responsive office and field great to work with.
Small company. Responsive. Normal
decent relationship. Polite, keeping clean job site,
Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A)
Attachment 3
NON-ARTERIAL STREETS ASPHALT REPAIRS ZONE D
(2024-104)
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Docusign Envelope ID: A472BD53-C9AE-476F-B23B-678F579D19E6 City of Lake Forest
Section 00500 Construction Contract
Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D
I. SECTION 00500 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ................................ ........
Docusign Envelope ID: A472BD53-C9AE-476F-B23B-678F579D19E6
Title: Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D
3 1. SECTION 00500 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
1.1. CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made this [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***], in the County of Orange, State of California, by and between the City of Lake Forest hereinafter called City, and LCR Earthwork & Engineering, Corp., hereinafter called Contractor. City and the Contractor for the considerations stated herein agree as follows:
1.2. SCOPE OF WORK
The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated the contract and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in "COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT" section below for the following Project:
Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D, 24S01A
The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.
1.3. TIME FOR COMPLETION
The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within Fifty (50) working days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.
1.4. CONTRACT PRICE
City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of TWO MILLION TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-SEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS ($2,257,700.00). Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions.
1.5. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay City the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event that Liquidated Damages are not paid, the Contractor agrees City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract.
This Article does not affect the City’s rights to other damages or remedies specified in the Contract Documents or allowed by law.
1.6. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT
The “Contract Documents” include the following:
Notice Inviting Bids
Docusign Envelope ID: A472BD53-C9AE-476F-B23B-678F579D19E6
Title: Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D
4 Instructions to Bidders
Bid Form
Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation Bid Bond
Designation of Subcontractors
Information Required of Bidders
Noncollusion Declaration form
Iran Contracting Act Certification
Public Works Contractor Registration Certification
Contract
Performance Bond
Payment Bond
General Conditions
Special Conditions
Technical Specifications
Addenda
Plans and Drawings
Approved and fully executed change orders
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contactor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.
All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.
1.7. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW
Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Project.
Docusign Envelope ID: A472BD53-C9AE-476F-B23B-678F579D19E6
Title: Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D
5 1.8. INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor shall provide indemnification as set forth in the General Conditions.
1.9. PREVAILING WAGES
Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at City Hall or may be obtained online at http//www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr. and which must be posted at the job site.
1.10. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.
LCR Earthwork & Engineering, Corp.
By [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]
Name: Jorge L Mendoza
Title: Vice President
License No. [CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER]
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
By [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
______________________________
Mark Tettemer
Mayor
By [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]
Name: [Jennifer Mendoza
Title: [Secretary (Corporation or LLC)
(If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR
Vice President AND Secretary OR Treasurer
REQUIRED)]
Attest:
[CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
Docusign Envelope ID: A472BD53-C9AE-476F-B23B-678F579D19E6 1048288
Title: Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D
6 [CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL]
[PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL]
[CITY CLERK - INSURANCE APPROVAL]
Approved as to Form:
[CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
__________________________________
Best Best & Krieger, LLP
City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: A472BD53-C9AE-476F-B23B-678F579D19E6
Attachment 4
Request for Bids (RFB) #(24S01A)
Title: Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A) 3 1. SECTION 00000 TITLE PAGE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A)
July 2024
Prepared By:
CITY OF LAKE FOREST, Public Works Department
Naz Mokarram, P.E
Under the Supervision Of:
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
Public Works Department
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Approved By:
Thomas Wheeler
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION
SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve the Sixth Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Sixth Amendment substantially in the form attached.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The proposed action would extend the agreement with Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc., (“Carlson”) an additional year with no increase in compensation.
The City retained Carlson after a competitive Request for Proposal process in 2016 to obtain and manage the environmental permits required to build the Civic Center site. Mitigation from one final permit under the regulatory oversight of the US Army Corps of Engineers (“ACOE”) remains to be completed. Given the experience on this project, their environmental expertise, and the complexity of the permits and mitigation requirements, retaining Carlson is critical to receiving the final approval from the ACOE. Staff anticipate receiving the final approval in 2025, at which time the contract would be complete.
The Agreement with Carlson includes overseeing contracts for landscape management and biological monitoring (Attachment 1). The contract scope includes monitoring and reporting for the mitigation area of the Civic Center campus, which is currently under the regulatory oversight of the US Army Corps of Engineers (“ACOE”) until the project receives final approval. The Agreement with Carlson has been subject to five amendments (Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). An extension to the Agreement term is necessary to ensure that Carlson can provide technical assistance that may be needed to receive ACOE approval.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Sixth Amendment to the Agreement with Carlson, which would extend the term of the Agreement by one year to December 4, 2025 (Attachment 7). The proposed Sixth Amendment
does not include changes to the compensation amount or unit prices in the Agreement with Carlson.
BACKGROUND:
Carlson managed the preparation of the original ACOE permit document that allowed the Civic Center to be built. After the permits were obtained, Carlson managed all the environmental mitigation services for the Civic Center during the construction and post construction periods. This work includes managing contracts for landscape management and biological monitoring as required by various environmental permits to construct the Civic Center. The City Council approved the Agreement with Carlson on July 5, 2016, with a compensation amount of $39,750. The Agreement has been amended five times (Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). These amendments are summarized in Table 1 below:
Table 1: Summary of Amendments to Agreement with Carlson Amendment Number
(Date of Approval)
Description
First Amendment (December 16,
2016)
City Council approved amendment to
extend term to December 5, 2021, and
increase compensation to $91,834.
Second Amendment (November 21,
2017)
City Council approved amendment to
add scope of work and increase
compensation to $120,977.50.
Third Amendment (October 5, 2021) City Manager approved amendment to extend term to November 15, 2022.
Fourth Amendment (November 11,
2022)
City Council approved amendment to
extend term to December 5, 2023
Fifth Amendment (October 17, 2023) City Council approved amendment to extend term to December 5, 2024
DISCUSSION:
The Civic Center is located in an aquatic resource integrity area within a Special Area Management Plan (“SAMP”) that is regulated by the ACOE, which means that a portion of the site includes a habitat that requires environmental mitigation work and oversight. As such, the Civic Center site contains numerous technical requirements the City must meet to remain in compliance. All pre-construction and construction requirements are met, and the City is in the post-construction phase of biological monitoring.
Carlson oversees the Civic Center mitigation efforts and assists the City by overseeing contracts for landscape management and biological monitoring. The oversight services provided by Carlson for permit implementation and final approval are still necessary, as the City is still under monitoring. At present, the site is still pending a Restrictive Covenant managed by the ACOE that was submitted on October 12, 2016.
Staff is proposing the Sixth Amendment to the Agreement (Attachment 6) to ensure that the term does not expire prior to ACOE approval in case additional services are needed to address any issues. If the proposed Sixth Amendment is approved, the term of the Agreement would be extended to December 5, 2025.
The Sixth Amendment does not include any changes to the scope of work or the compensation amount in the Agreement.
Over the term of the Agreement, Carlson addressed all regulatory compliance requirements and worked with staff to address issues as needed. Staff believes that Carlson’s performance has met or exceeded the Agreement’s scope of work relative to the responsibilities associated with environmental permit services. The chart below provides an overall summary of the contractor’s performance since the most recent amendment. Consistent with the City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, including vendor assessment, staff recommends approval of the Sixth Amendment to the contract to ensure that the City retains the ability to respond to any issues relating to the mitigation site (Attachment 7).
Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc. Performance Assessment October 17, 2023 through November 19, 2024
Performance of Scope of Services ☐ Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very Satisfied ☐ N/A
Timeliness ☐ Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very
Satisfied ☐ N/A
Budget Performance ☐ Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very
Satisfied ☐ N/A
Customer Service ☐ Unsatisfied ☐ Satisfied ☒ Very
Satisfied ☐ N/A
The Finance Department prepared the proposed Sixth Amendment, and the City Attorney reviewed and approved it as to form.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed Sixth Amendment would extend the term of the Agreement with Carlson by one year to December 5, 2025. The proposed Sixth Amendment does not include adjustments to the compensation amount in the Agreement or unit prices.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Agreement for Professional Consultant Services - Carlson, Inc.
2. First Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services – Carlson, Inc.
3. Second Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services - Carlson, Inc.
4. Third Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services – Carlson, Inc.
5. Fourth Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services – Carlson, Inc.
6. Proposed Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services-Carlson, Inc.
7. Proposed Sixth Amendment to Agreement for Professional Consultant Services – Carlson, Inc.
Initiated By: Michael McConaha, Public Works Maintenance Manager Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 1 -
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PARTIES AND DATE.
This Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services (“Third Amendment”) is entered into on the ____ day of ________, 20___, by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (“City”) and Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc., a California corporation, with its principal place of business at 27134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 ("Consultant”) . City and "Consultant” are someti mes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
RECITALS.
2.1 Agreement. The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Consultant Services dated July 5, 2016 (“Agreement”).
2.2 First Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain First Amendment to the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement, expand the scope of services, and increase the total amount of compensation under the agreement dated December 6, 2016 (“First Amendment”).
2.3 Second Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain Second Amendment to amend the Agreement in order to increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement on November 21, 2017 (“Second Amendment”).
2.4 Third Amendment. The Parties entered into that certain Third Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement and update the Delivery of Notices on October 14, 2021 (“Third Amendment”).
2.5 Fourth Amendment. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement.
TERMS.
3.1 Term. Section 3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be from July 5, 2016 to December 5, 2023, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 65FB61FA-0BFD-4599-956B-B0C7E8921028 November1 22
55136.00200\31919338.1 - 2 -
3.2 Remaining Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Fourth Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS
By:
Robert Pequeño
Mayor
By:
Peter Carlson
President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:
By:
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By:
Peter Carlson
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
DocuSign Envelope ID: 65FB61FA-0BFD-4599-956B-B0C7E8921028
Attachment 5
Attachment 7
RESOURCE AGENCY PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR
CIVIC CENTER (2016-069.6)
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Docusign Envelope ID: 5672F61F-EF45-40E0-A763-02CC18EDACA0 City of Lake Forest
Sixth Amendment to Professional Consultant Services Agreement Resource Agency Permit Implementation Services for Civic Center I. PARTIES AND DATE. ................................ ................................ ..............
II. RECITALS. ................................ ................................ ..............................
III. TERMS................................. ................................ ................................ ..
IV. SIGNATURES. ................................ ................................ ........................
Docusign Envelope ID: 5672F61F-EF45-40E0-A763-02CC18EDACA0
Title: Resource Agency Permit Implementation Services for Civic Center 3 1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Sixth Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services ("Sixth Amendment") is entered into on the [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***], by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630 (“City”) and Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc., a California Corporation (Inc.) , with its principal place of business at 27134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” Docusign Envelope ID: 5672F61F-EF45-40E0-A763-02CC18EDACA0
Title: Resource Agency Permit Implementation Services for Civic Center 4 2. RECITALS.
2.1. Agreement
The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Consultant Services dated July 5, 2016 (“Agreement”).
2.2. First Amendment
The Parties entered into that certain First Amendment to the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement, expand the scope of services, and increase the total amount of compensation under the agreement dated December 6, 2016 (“First Amendment”).
2.3. Second Amendment
The Parties entered into that certain Second Amendment to amend the Agreement in order to increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement on November 21, 2017 (“Second Amendment”).
2.4. Third Amendment
The Parties entered into that certain Third Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement and update the Delivery of Notices on October 14, 2021 (“Third Amendment”).
2.5. Fourth Amendment
The Parties entered into that certain Fourth Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement on November 1, 2022 (“Fourth Amendment”).
2.6. Fifth Amendment
The Parties entered into that certain Fifth Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement on November 9, 2023 ("Fifth Amendment").
2.7. Sixth Amendment
The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: 5672F61F-EF45-40E0-A763-02CC18EDACA0
Title: Resource Agency Permit Implementation Services for Civic Center 5 3. TERMS.
3.1. Term.
Section 3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be from July 5, 2016 to December 5, 2025 , unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
3.2. Remaining Provisions of Agreement.
Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Sixth Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Docusign Envelope ID: 5672F61F-EF45-40E0-A763-02CC18EDACA0
Title: Resource Agency Permit Implementation Services for Civic Center 6 4. SIGNATURES.
4.1. SIGNATURES.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc.
By: [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
Mark Tettemer
Mayor
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]
Peter Carlson
President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:
By: [CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]
Peter Carlson
Secretary (Corporation or LLC)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: [CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
[CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL]
[PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL]
[CITY CLERK - INSURANCE APPROVAL]
Docusign Envelope ID: 5672F61F-EF45-40E0-A763-02CC18EDACA0
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC.
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement for Traffic Engineering Services with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the Second Amendment with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc., substantially in the form attached.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Public Works Department utilizes traffic engineering consultants to support the Traffic Engineering Division. These consultants provide technical assistance to the Traffic Engineering Manager, which includes reviewing development plans, conducting traffic studies, offering design services, administering construction support, securing grant funding, responding to residents, and completing other necessary tasks.
In December 2020, the City entered into the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. (HCI) for Traffic Engineering Consulting Services (“Agreement”) (Attachment 1). The Agreement included a three-year term and a $480,000 compensation amount. In December 2023, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Agreement with HCI, which extended the term of the Agreement by one year and added $350,000 to the compensation amount (“First Amendment”) (Attachment 2). HCI has fulfilled all contract requirements to date, and staff recommends the City Council authorize the proposed Second Amendment to the Agreement, which would extend the term by an additional year and add $400,000 in compensation (Attachment 3). If approved, the proposed Second Amendment would bring the total compensation amount in the Agreement to $1,230,000. The proposed Second Amendment includes a 3% increase applied to all hourly rates, which is slightly below the CPI rate of 3.2% published by the California Department of Industrial Relations from July 2023 to June 2024.
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Second Amendment to the Agreement with HCI (Attachment 3). The proposed Second Amendment was prepared by the Finance Department and has been approved as to form by the City Attorney. Sufficient funds are available in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget and the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Program Budget for this action.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department utilizes consultant services to support the Traffic Engineering Division. These consultants provide technical assistance to the Traffic Engineering Manager, which may include reviewing development plans, conducting traffic studies, offering design services, administering construction support, procuring grant funding, responding to residents, and completing other necessary tasks.
Previously, the City engaged HCI for on-call traffic consultant services under a prior agreement from November 2015 to November 2020. During that time, HCI provided generalized staff support, including conducting development reviews, preparing special studies, managing the Lake Forest Transportation Mitigation (“LFTM”) program and model, offering design services, supporting construction administration for Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) projects, identifying and securing grant funding, and completing other traffic engineering tasks as needed.
In December 2020, the City Council approved the current Agreement with HCI for $480,000, covering a three-year term from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023 (Attachment 1) to provide Traffic Engineering Consulting Services. The award of this Agreement was the result of a competitive procurement process conducted in accordance with the City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines.
In December 2023, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Agreement with HCI, which provided a one-year term extension and $350,000 in additional compensation. The First Amendment brought the total compensation amount of the Agreement to $830,000 (Attachment 2).
DISCUSSION:
The scope of work for Traffic Engineering Services encompasses a variety of tasks to assist the Traffic Engineering Division. These tasks include preparing routine and special traffic engineering studies, providing design services, conducting development reviews, overseeing traffic signal monitoring and operations, addressing street sweeping and parking issues, and reviewing Capital Improvement Plan projects, among other related work. As outlined in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget, the work assigned to HCI over the next year includes:
•Development Review (up to $90,000): This involves reviews related to major developments such as various potential industrial projects, redevelopment of business properties, and fiber optic and utility infrastructure improvements. This work is typically reimbursed by the applicant.
•CIP Review and Construction Support (up to $140,000): This includes the review of project design plans, specifications, and construction engineering support for 40 street and traffic-related projects from the CIP.
Notable projects include:
oLake Forest Transportation Mitigation (LFTM) Program Projects:
▪Bake Parkway and Jeronimo Road Widening Project
▪Lake Forest Drive and Jeronimo Road Widening Project
▪Lake Forest Drive and Rancho Parkway De-Facto Lane
Project
▪Los Alisos Boulevard/Rockfield Boulevard De-Facto Lane Project
oFoothill Circulation Phasing Plan (FCPP):
▪El Toro Road and Jeronimo Road Realignment Project
▪El Toro Raised Medians Project
▪Los Alisos Boulevard and Muirlands Boulevard Widening
Project
oDeveloper Funded Projects:
▪Bake Parkway and Toledo Way Widening Project
oTraffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP) Projects:
▪Alton Parkway TSSP
▪Bake Parkway/Rockfield Boulevard TSSP
▪Irvine Boulevard/Trabuco Road TSSP
▪Lake Forest Drive TSSP
▪Portola Parkway TSSP
▪Countywide Baseline TSSP
oCommunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funded Projects:
▪Accessible Pedestrian Signal Systems Projects
▪ADA Curb Ramps Projects
•Traffic Engineering Studies and Review (up to $85,000): This includes the Engineering and Traffic Survey, which establishes posted speed limits in the city, as well as reviews of the Heavy Vehicle Impact Study, the Traffic Operations Improvement Study, and other studies related to parking and street sweeping.
•Traffic Engineering Staff Support (up to $85,000): This involves assistance with permit parking reviews, street sweeping evaluations, and responding to resident inquiries.
The proposed Second Amendment with HCI includes a 3% increase for all hourly rates. The adjustments to the hourly rates are based upon current Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) as reported by the California Department of Industrial Relations, which stands at 3.2%. HCI has proposed an increase in hourly rates that is approximately 3%, slightly below that published CPI rate. Table 1 below provides an overview of the compensation status of the Agreement, as well as the proposed compensation reflecting the revised hourly rates.
Table 1: Consultant Agreement Compensation Status
AGREEMENT COMPENSATION STATUS
Approved Original Agreement Amount $ 480,000.00
First Amendment Amount $ 350,000.00
Current Contract Expenditures $ 665,305.47
Current Remaining Contract Amount $ 164,694.53
Proposed Second Amendment Additional Compensation $ 400,000.00
TOTAL PROPOSED CONTRACT AMOUNT
(Not-to-Exceed) $1,230,000.00
Developer and CIP-related projects are funded directly by project-specific budgets. The proposed Second Amendment to the Agreement with HCI (Attachment 3) would provide sufficient contract authority to support these projects as the need arises.
Vendor Performance Assessment
Pursuant to the City’s Purchasing and Contract Guidelines, staff completes a vendor performance assessment during the preparation of a proposed contract amendment. The vendor performance assessment is used as a guide to determine whether a contract should be amended, renewed, or terminated based on performance in the following categories: performance of scope of services; timeliness; budget performance; and customer service. Utilizing an evaluation form, staff rates the consultant in each category as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Consultant Performance Review
Hartzog and Crabill, Inc. – Performance Review
January 1, 2021, through October 25, 2024
Category Unsatisfied – Very Satisfied
Performance of Scope of
services
☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A
Timeliness ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A Budget Performance ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A Customer Service ☐Unsatisfied ☐Satisfied ☒Very Satisfied ☐N/A The chart above provides an overall summary of HCI’s performance over the term of the Agreement. HCI received an overall rating of “very satisfied” on this assessment, which means HCI is eligible for an amendment.
Therefore, staff recommends the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with HCI to increase the total compensation under the Agreement to $1,230,000 and to extend the term by one year. Sufficient funds exist in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget and the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan budget for the recommended action.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed Second Amendment to the Agreement with HCI would increase the compensation amount by $400,000 to a not-to-exceed total compensation amount of $1,230,000 at the revised hourly rates. Of the $400,000 in additional compensation, staff expect approximately $90,000 to be development review- related, which would be fully reimbursable, and up to $140,000 to be Capital Improvement Plan project-related. Sufficient funds exist in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget and the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan budget to cover the costs of the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Professional Consultant Services Agreement with HCI
2. First Amendment to Professional Consultant Services Agreement with HCI
3. Second Amendment to Professional Consultant Services Agreement with HCI
Initiated By: Tran Tran, Traffic Engineering Manager
Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment 1
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PROFESSIONAL CONSUL TANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Agreement is made and entered into this .J.S._ day of fE:C.,, , 20 ~ by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, 92630 ("City") and Hartzog and Crabill, Inc., a California Corporation, with its principal place of business at 17852 E. 1 P1 Street, Suite 1 0 1, Tustin, CA 92780 ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
2. RECITALS.
2.1 Consultant.
Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional on-call traffic engineering consulting services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional on-call traffic engineering consulting services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.
2.2 Project.
City desires to engage Consultant to render such professional on-call traffic engineering consulting services for the Traffic Engineering Services project ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.
3. TERMS.
3.1 Scope of Services and Term.
3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional on-call traffic engineering consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement automatically for no more than two (2) additional one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. (BB&K2019)
55136.00200\31918793 .1 -1-
3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.
3.2.1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.
Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.
3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.
3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements . All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.
3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Scott Ma, PE, TE.
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793 .1 -2-
3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates Thomas Wheeler, PE, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, or his designee, to act as its representative in all matters pertaining to the administration and performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative").
City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant but not the authority to enlarge the Scope of Work or change the total compensation due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on City's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Scope of Work or change the Consultant's total compensation subject to the provisions contained in Section 3.3 of this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City Manager, City's Representative or his/her designee.
3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Trammell Hartzog, HCI Principal, or his designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.
3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.
3.2.8 Standard of Care: Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.
As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.
3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, (BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793 .1 -3-
employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
3.2.10 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions, where applicable, shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.
3.2.11 Insurance. Consultant agrees to procure and maintain, at Consultant's expense all insurance specified in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to carry the same policies and limits of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain, unless otherwise approved in writing by the City.
3.2.12 Water Quality Management and Compliance.
3.2.12.1 Storm Water Management. Storm, surface, nuisance, or other waters may be encountered at various times during the Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters, and assumes any and all risks and liabilities arising therefrom.
3.2.12.2 Compliance with Water Quality Laws, Ordinances and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Services including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the City's ordinances regulating water quality and storm water; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq.); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code§ 13000 et seq.); and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority. Consultant must additionally comply with the lawful requirements of the City, and any other municipality, drainage district, or other local agency with jurisdiction over the location where the Services are to be conducted, regulating water quality and storm water discharges.
3.2.12.3 Compliance with DAMP and LIP. In addition to compliance with the laws, ordinances and regulations listed in Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement, Consultant must comply with all applicable requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan ("DAMP"), the City of Lake Forest Local Implementation Plan ("LIP") and the applicable Water Quality Management Plan ("WQMP"). The DAMP contains requirements related to design and construction of public projects. Consultant must be familiar the DAMP, and the LIP and comply with the requirements as specified therein.
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1 -4-
A copy of the DAMP is available on the internet at:
https://media.ocgov.com/gov/pw/watersheds/documents/dam p/default.as p A copy of the LIP is available on the internet at:
http://www.lakeforestca.gov/depts/pw/water/local implementation plan %28Iip%29.asp More information on the applicable WQMP is available on the internet at:
http://www.lakeforestca.gov/depts/pw/water/water quality management plan (wqmp).asp
3.2.12.4 Standard of Care. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to them without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in Sections 3.2.12.2 and 3.2.12.3 of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors have or will receive adequate training, as determined by the City, regarding these requirements as they may relate to the Services.
3.2.12.5 Liability for Non-compliance.
(A) Indemnity: Failure to comply with laws, regulations, and ordinances listed in Sections 3.2.12.2 and 3.2.12.3 of this Agreement is a violation of federal and state law. Notwithstanding any other indemnity contained in this Agreement, Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses or liabilities of any kind or nature which the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers may sustain or incur for noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and ordinances listed above, arising out of or in connection with the Services, except for liability resulting from the sole established negligence, willful misconduct or active negligence of the City, its officials, officers , agents , employees or authorized volunteers.
(B) Defense: City reserves the right to defend any enforcement action or civil action brought against the City for Consultant's failure to comply with any applicable water quality law, regulation, or policy. Consultant hereby agrees to be bound by, and to reimburse the City for the costs associated with, any settlement reached between the City and the relevant enforcement entity .
(C) Damages: City may seek damages from Consultant for
delay in completing the Services caused by Consultant's failure to comply with the laws, regulations and policies described in Sections 3.2.12.2 and 3.2.12.3 of this Agreement, or any other relevant water quality law, regulation, or policy.
3.3 Fees and Payments.
3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($480,000) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager as applicable . Extra Work (BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1 -5-
may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly invoice which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The invoice shall describe the amount of Services provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the invoice.
City shall, within 30 days of receiving such invoice, review the invoice and pay all non-disputed and approved charges thereon. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, the City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth therein.
3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City, or included in Exhibit "C" of this Agreement.
3.3.4 Extra Work . At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.
Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.
3.3.5 Rate Increases. In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rate set forth in Exhibit "C" may be adjusted each year at the time of renewal as set forth in Exhibit "C."
3.4 Labor Code Requirements.
3.4.1 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1 ,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
3.4.2 Registration. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"). Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration (BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793 .1 -6-
of the project and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be Contractor's sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR.
3.5 Accounting Records.
3.5.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
3.6 General Provisions.
3.6.1 Termination of Agreement.
3.6.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation . Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.
3.6.1.2 Effect of Termination . If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.
3.6.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated .
3.6.1.4 Deliver y of Notices . All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
Consultant:
City :
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1
Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.
17852 E. 17th Street, Suite 101
Tustin, CA 92780
ATTN: Trammell Hartzog, HCI Principal
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
ATTN: City Clerk
-7-
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.6.2 Ownershi p of Materials and Confidentialit y.
3.6.2.1 Documents & Data; Licensin g of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications , studies, drawings , estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data") . Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data.
Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time , provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.
3.6.2.2 Confidentialit y. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
3.6.2 .3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant's proprietary information ("Proprietary Information") unless the City's legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information .
Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant's objection to the City's release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney's fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City's choice of legal counsel}, and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information. (BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1 -8-
3.6.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
3.6.4 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action.
3.6.5 Indemnification.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City's choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers .
If Consultant's obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant's performance as a "design professional" (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant's indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant's liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault.
3.6.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.
3.6. 7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.
3.6.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
3.6.9 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.
3.6.1 O Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.
3.6.11 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or (BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793 .1 -9-
transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
3.6.12 Construction: References: Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.
3.6.13 Amendment: Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.
3.6.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
3.6.15 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
3.6.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
3.6.17 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
3.6.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1 -10-
3.6.19 Labor Certification . By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
3.6.20 Authorit y to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver , and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.
3.6.21 Counter parts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
3.7 Subcontracting.
3.7.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
By ~ ~ zedi
Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
~
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
(BB&K 2019)
55136 . 00200\31918793 .1 -11-
HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC.
By:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND
Secretary OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The traffic engineering services includes but is not limited to the following duties:
A. General Traffic Engineering
1. Provide professional advice and technical assistance to department management and staff, as well as commissions, committees and the public on traffic and transportation matters; confers with a variety of public and private officials on traffic engineering issues and may serve as the City's traffic planning representative to other governmental agencies.
2. Review projects in adjoining jurisdictions that may affect Lake Forest motorists.
The review of these projects will typically require a traffic study or analysis, and coordination with the traffic engineer in the adjoining city.
3. Address various questions and requests from the public associated with traffic operations. Responses may require traffic data collection services and field reviews of current traffic or parking conditions to provide a response to residents consistent with the City's high level of quality customer service.
4. Assist in managing the Lake Forest Traffic Mitigation ("LFTM") model. The LFTM model is a TRANPLAN based system operated by a third-party consultant.
5. Develop and evaluates traffic administration policies and procedures.
6. Direct, conduct or coordinate studies and prepare reports and correspondence to traffic control issues.
7. Meet with the public regarding traffic-related matters including individuals, homeowner associations, neighborhood groups, etc. Respond to public inquiries and complaints in a courteous manner; provides information within area of assignment; determines appropriate corrective action necessary to resolve complaints in an efficient and timely manner; coordinates activities with other City staff in resolving complaints.
8. Write and review major reports, correspondence, and other materials. Prepare City Council agenda reports. Attend City Council meetings and may occasionally answer questions and make presentations.
9. Plan and evaluate the work of assigned professional and technical engineering staff involved in the preparation and submission of engineering plans, specifications, and reports.
10. Participate in the development and administration of the Traffic Engineering Division annual budget; participates in the forecast of funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials, and supplies. Monitor and approve expenditures. 11 . Plan, assign, and evaluate the work of consultant staff to complete work assigned by City staff.
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1
Exhibit "A"-1
12. Review traffic control plans from submitted encroachment permit applicants such as utility companies and others performing work in public streets.
13. Performs related duties as required.
B. Manage GIP Projects
1. Assist in managing traffic improvement projects in the Capital Improvement Projects "GIP" program. The GIP includes developing a traffic signal coordination master plan that will provide an analysis of the current state of the City's traffic signal system.
2. Assist in the coordinating with the Orange County Transportation Agency and adjoining cities on traffic signal synchronization projects ('TSSP") along arterial roadways throughout the City.
C. Review Development Projects
1. Review and provide comments on the traffic elements, site plans and other related documents for proposed development projects within the City.
2. Review traffic control plans from submitted encroachment permit applicants such as utility companies and others performing work in public streets.
3. Observe construction of traffic improvements by private developers and make recommendations regarding completion and acceptance of the work.
D. Grant Funding Support Services
1. Identify and provide assistance with developing and procuring grant funding opportunities to address potential traffic improvements within the City. (BB&K 2019)
55136 .00200\31918793 .1
Exhibit "A"-2
EXHIBIT "B"
SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
The Traffic Engineering Consultant team is expected to perform duties on an on-call basis. In the past the City has utilized about 4-8 hours of general traffic engineering consultant services a week. Another 4-8 hours will be needed for project management for CIP projects including, but not limited to, OCTA TSSP Projects and projects related to the City's traffic model (LFTM). Review of new development traffic studies and site plans will require another 4-8 hours per week. On average, the Consultant will provide about 20 hours per week of assistance and support. The number of hours and mix of work will depend on the actual workload.
Most of the work can be accomplished most efficiently at City Hall. However, with COVID the City is open to remote capabilities. In addition, some work, including but not limited to, development plan review, traffic control plan review for permits, and preparation of exhibits may be able to be completed off site. The City will provide t~e Consultant standard workspace accommodations including telephone, personal computer and internet access at City Hall. (BB&K 2019)
55136 .00200\31918793 .1
Exhibit "8"-1
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION
Consultant shall be paid for services rendered in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement, and as described above under Scope of Work, the not-to-exceed fee of four hundred eighty thousand dollars ($480,000). Consultant will be paid on a time-and-materials basis at the hourly rates and fees set forth below.
Staff Member Title Staff Member Hourly Rate
Expert Witness/ Deposition $285
Litigation Consultation $255
Two-Person Survey Crew $255
Litigation Field Evaluation $230
Principal Consultant Mr. Trammell Hartzog $175
Mr. Jerry Stock, PE,TE $175
Project Manager/ Program Manager Mr. Scott Ma, PE, TE $145 Registered Land Surveyor $160
Senior Engineer Mr. Bernie Dennis, TE $150
Storm Water Permit Compliance Engineer $150
Associate Engineer Mr. Michael Vallado $145
Construction Manager $135
Traffic Signal System Supervisor Mr. Greg Cabey $135
Mural Artist $135
Senior Designer Mr. Todd Hartzog $130
Mr. Dave Martorano $130
Traffic Signal Systems Specialist Mr. Dave Pickrell $125 Mr. Michael Powers $125
Assistant Engineer $120
Draftsperson $100
Technician $85
Word Processor $70
Clerical Ms. Patie Hernandez $57
*Traffic Counts (Cost, plus 10%) *
Hourly rates are effective as of November 17, 2020.
Out of pocket expenses (blueprinting, reproduction, printing, and delivery service) will be invoiced at cost. These other direct costs are included in the not-to-exceed values for the Scope of Services.
A 10% fee for administration, coordination , and handling will be added to subcontracted services.
(BB&K 2017)
55136.00200\31918 793.1
Exhibit "C"-1
EXHIBIT "D"
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
3.2.11 Insurance.
3.2.11.1 Time for Com pliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.
3.2.11.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance . If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
(A) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); or (3) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement. (B) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering "Any Auto" (Symbol 1), or the exact equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined limit for each occurrence (C) Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation
Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease . (D) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): Professional Liability insurance or Errors & Omissions insurance appropriate to Consultant's profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution , testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.). If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
3.2.11.3 Insurance Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1
(A) Commercial General Liability :
Exhibit "D"-1
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials , officers , employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.
Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be
restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude "contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement. For all policies of Commercial General Liability insurance, Consultant shall provide endorsements in the form of ISO CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage) to effectuate this requirement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (B) Automobile Liability:
(C) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
3.2.11.4 Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions):
(A) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (B) Contractual Liability Exclusion Deleted: This insurance shall include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement. The policy must "pay on behalf of' the insured and include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend.
3.2.11.5 Workers' Compensation:
(A) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium . (B) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers .
3.2.11.6 Primar y and Non-Contributin g Insurance. All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.
3.2.11. 7 Waiver of Subro gation . All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall contain or be endorsed to waive subrogation against the City, its officials , officers , employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to (BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793.1
Exhibit "D"-2
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
3.2.11.8 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.
3.2.11.9 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates on forms approved by the City, together with all endorsements affecting each policy. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen ( 15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.
3.2.11 .10 Failure to Maintain Coverage. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement effective upon notice.
3.2.11.11 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current AM. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to transact business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.
3.2.11.12 Enforcement of Agreement Provisions (non estoppel) .
Consultant acknowledges and agrees that actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligation on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
3.2.11.13 Requirements Not Limiting. Requirement of specific coverage or minimum limits contained in this Appendix are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance.
3.2.11.14 Insurance for Subconsultants. Consultant shall include all subconsultants engaged in any work for Consultant relating to this Agreement as additional insureds under the Consultant's policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing (BB&K 2019)
55136 .00200\31918 793.1
Exhibit "D"-3
subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds to the subconsultant's policies. All policies of Commercial General Liability insurance provided by Consultant's subconsultants performing work relating to this Agreement shall be endorsed to name the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds using endorsement form ISO CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing equivalent coverage. Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract relating to this Agreement until it has received satisfactory evidence of subconsultant's compliance with all insurance requirements under this Agreement, to the extent applicable. The Consultant shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with this section upon request of the City.
(BB&K 2019)
55136.00200\31918793 .1
Exhibit "D"-4
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
(2020-077.2)
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.
Lake Forest, CA 92630
City of Lake Forest
Second Amendment to Professional Consultant Services Agreement On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
I. PARTIES AND DATE. ..............................................................................
II. RECITALS. ..............................................................................................
III. TERMS...................................................................................................
IV. SIGNATURES. ........................................................................................
V. EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION ..............................................................
Title: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
3 1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Second Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services ("Second Amendment") is entered into on the [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***], by and between the City of Lake Forest, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630 (“City”) and Hartzog and Crabill, Inc., a California Corporation (Inc.) , with its principal place of business at 17821 E. 17th Street, Suite 245, Tustin, CA 92780 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
Title: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
4 2. RECITALS.
2.1. Agreement
The Parties entered into that certain Agreement for On-Call Traffic Engineering dated December 15, 2020 (“Agreement”).
2.2. First Amendment
The Parties entered into that certain First Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement dated December 11, 2023 ("First Amendment").
2.3. Second Amendment
The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the total amount of compensation under the Agreement.
Title: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
5 3. TERMS.
3.1. Term.
Section 3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
3.2. Compensation.
Section 3.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,230,000.00) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.3. Remaining Provisions of Agreement.
Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Second Amendment, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Title: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
6 4. SIGNATURES.
4.1. SIGNATURES.
CITY OF LAKE FOREST Hartzog and Crabill, Inc.
By: [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
Mark Tettemer
Mayor
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]
Gerald Stock
Vice President
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
ATTEST:
By: [CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
By: [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]
Todd Hartzog
Treasurer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: [CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
[CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL]
[PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL]
[CITY CLERK - INSURANCE APPROVAL]
Title: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
7 5. EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION
5.1. EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION
Consultant shall be paid for services in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement and as described above under Exhibit “A” Scope of Services and the not to exceed fee of one million two hundred and thirty thousand dollars ($1,230,000). Compensation shall be paid on a time-and materials basis at the hourly rates and fees set forth below.
Schedule of Hourly Rates
City of Lake Forest
(Effective January 1, 2025 – December 31, 2025)
Classification Hourly Rates
Expert Witness / Deposition $294
Litigation Consultation $263
Two-Person Survey Crew $263
Litigation Field Evaluation $237
Principal Consultant $180
Project Manager/Program Manager (Mr. Scott Ma, PE, TE) $170 / $150 Registered Land Surveyor $165
Senior Engineer $155
Storm Water Permit Compliance Engineer $155
Associate Engineer $149
Construction Manager $139
Traffic Signal System Supervisor $139
Mural Artist $139
Senior Designer $134
Traffic Signal Systems Specialist $129
Title: On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
8 Assistant Engineer $124
Draftsperson $103
Technician $88
Word Processor $72
Clerical $59
*Traffic Counts (Cost, plus 10%) $*
This Schedule of Hourly Rates will be effective January 1, 2025.
Out of pocket expenses (blueprinting, reproduction, printing, and delivery service) will be invoiced at Cost. These other direct costs are included in the not-to-exceed values for the aforementioned scope of services.
A 10% fee for administration, coordination, and handling will be added to subcontracted services.
Mileage shall be per current IRS rate (rate can be found at the following link:
https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-issues-standard-mileage-rates-for-2024-mileage-rate-increases-to- 67-cents-a-mile-up-1-point-5-cents-from-2023).
In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3.1.2, the rates set forth above may be increased or reduced each year at the time of renewal, but any increase shall not exceed the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 11/19/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2024-25
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The determination of speed limits on City streets is conducted through an Engineering and Traffic Survey (“Survey”) in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“CA MUTCD”). Properly established speed limits reflect prevailing driver behavior and enable the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (“OCSD”) to effectively utilize electronic speed monitoring devices (i.e., radar) for enforcement.
To ensure that speed limits are based on current conditions and remain enforceable via radar, these surveys must be updated at intervals specified in the CVC. On January 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 43 (“AB 43”) took effect and made several additions and modifications to the CVC and subsequently the CA MUTCD that authorize local jurisdictions to establish “safety corridors” that would slightly lower speed limits on certain streets. The most recent Survey results indicate that out of the 125 speed limit segments assessed, 62 should remain unchanged, 60 should decrease, and three should be added. Consequently, no increases in speed limits were necessary.
In accordance with the CVC, the City is required to adopt an ordinance to formalize the revised speed limits for the affected street segments. Staff
estimates that the cost for the installation and removal of the necessary speed limit signage will be approximately $25,000; however, sufficient funds are not available within the 2023-2025 Operating Budget. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance (Attachment 1) and accompanying budget resolution (Attachment 2) to effectuate the needed changes.
BACKGROUND:
To fulfill the requirements of Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code, the City must establish legal speed limits for public streets. This is essential for enabling the Orange County Sheriff’s Department to enforce posted speed limits using radar, laser, or other electronic speed measurement devices. Furthermore, CVC Section 627 mandates that the City conduct surveys in accordance with the methodologies published by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). In accordance with state law, these surveys must encompass several key factors, including: (1) prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; (2) accident records; and (3) highway, traffic, and roadside conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists.
On October 8, 2021, Assembly Bill 43 (“AB 43”) was signed by Governor Newsom that made several additions to the CVC. On November 2021, Caltrans made several additions and modifications to the CA MUTCD to comply with AB 43 authorizing local jurisdictions to establish slightly lower speed limits to enhance safety on certain streets, which would be referred to as “safety corridors.” The new law took effect on January 1, 2022, but required Caltrans to amend the CA MUTCD before local jurisdictions could implement the updated provisions. Caltrans completed the necessary modifications to the CA MUTCD as of June 30, 2024, enabling local jurisdictions to begin utilizing the new provisions DISCUSSION:
The Engineering and Traffic Survey (“Survey”) serves as a basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for public streets within the City of Lake Forest. Per the CVC, the Survey requires updates every seven to 10 years. For this reason, the City Council approved funding in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget to update the Survey. The City contracted with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc. (“HCI”), a professional traffic engineering consulting firm, to complete the updates. Per standard practices, HCI selected specific locations on each street to measure vehicular speeds. The location had minimum influence from any stop signs, traffic signals, or roundabouts, minimum visibility restrictions, non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways, and minimum interference from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect normal motorists’ operations.
The Survey included an evaluation of the prevailing speeds of vehicles during non-peak hours, traffic collisions, traffic volumes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions. HCI also conducted field reviews of each segment of roadway. These field reviews evaluated specific conditions unique to each segment including roadway geometrics, frequency of intersections, driveways and on-street parking, locations of traffic control devices, visibility obstructions, proximity of schools and parks, speed limits of adjacent segments, and other conditions not readily apparent to motorists. These Survey criteria are consistent with the methodologies utilized by the City that are consistent with the CVC and CA MUTCD.
According to the CA MUTCD, the prima facie limits for speed zones should be set at the nearest 5 MPH (“miles per hour”) increment to the prevailing speed, which is also referred to as the critical or 85th percentile speed. The prevailing speed is determined by measuring the existing speeds of vehicles within the respective zone. The CA MUTCD bases the procedure on the principle that the vast majority of the motorists (85%) drive safely and that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. Law enforcement is used to address the behavior of the remaining motorists. The CA MUTCD allows consideration of a slightly lower speed limit under limited circumstances and some of the speed limit recommendations took this into account. This was generally used to keep a small number of speed limits at the current limit due to limited sight distance or other unique roadway characteristics.
In addition to the CA MUTCD, Assembly Bill 43 (effective January 1, 2022) was introduced with several additions and modifications to the CVC that empowered local jurisdictions to establish slightly lower speed limits to enhance safety on certain streets. As part of the City’s Vision Statement and Strategic Plan goals that focus on a livable city that is well-planned, attractive, and safe, AB 43 provides an opportunity for the City to consider safety and community needs when reducing speed limits or setting speed limits. The primary factor in determining the severity of a collision is speed. Until recently, safety was not a consideration when it came to setting speed limits. Staff’s recommendation includes following AB 43’s intentions to reduce speeds in select locations by 5 MPH to protect the most vulnerable populations (for example, pedestrians, bicyclists, seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities) by giving more time to react in preventing a collision. The most immediate opportunity for the City to implement reduced speed limits is outlined below:
CVC 22358.7: Local governments may reduce speed limits by an additional 5 mph on designated "safety corridors" or areas near locations frequented by pedestrians and cyclists, particularly vulnerable groups. The definition of "safety corridors" will be established by Caltrans, specifically the CA MUTCD, and local authorities may not implement reductions under this section until June 30, 2024, or until a new online tool for adjudicating traffic infractions is introduced, whichever comes first.
As of January 1, 2023, Caltrans further clarified CVC 22358.7 allowing for the reduction of speed limits by 5 MPH on or after July 1, 2024, by introducing two new categories to the CA MUTCD. The first category is for streets designated as Safety Corridors, while the second is for streets that have high concentrations of bicyclists and/or pedestrians. It is important to note that this provision does not apply to Caltrans State highways.
Safety Corridor (CVC 22358.7 (a) (1)):
The CA MUTCD defines a “Safety Corridor” to be a street where the highest number of fatalities and/or serious injury collisions occurs over a period of three (3) to five (5) years. Safety Corridors are limited to 20-percent of City maintained streets. Therefore, it could become appropriate that certain collisions involving vulnerable populations (for example, children, seniors, and persons with disabilities) are weighted more to prioritize which streets get the Safety Corridor designation. Since staff recommends only designating 19.67 miles (9.84%) of streets as part of the AB 43 designation of a Safety Corridor (which is less than the 20% maximum limit) weighting of accidents is not necessary currently.
Streets designated as a Safety Corridor may have the speed limit reduced by 5 MPH.
High Pedestrian and Bike Users (CVC 22358.7 (a) (2)):
Based on the CA MUTCD, streets that have facilities that generate high concentration of pedestrian and bike users may have the speed limit reduced by 5 MPH. Examples of these facilities include schools, parks, medical facilities, religious centers, and shopping centers. It is important to note that only the portion within 1,320 feet of these types of facilities would qualify for the 5 MPH speed reduction. In accordance with the CA MUTCD, an acceptable alternative to determining the high concentration of pedestrian and bike users is to identify the streets within the top 20-percent of fatalities and/or serious injury collisions involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists over a period of three to five years.
Also, staff will continue to assess speed limits and identify additional streets eligible for reductions based on these changes:
CVC 22358.8: This provision allows local governments to counteract the trend of increasing speed limits, often referred to as "speed creep," which can occur due to the state's 85th percentile law (CVC 22358.6). It stipulates that if a local authority determines, based on an engineering and traffic survey, that the proposed speed limit is excessive, it may either retain the existing speed limit or revert to the previous limit established through a valid study, provided no additional general-purpose lanes have been added since that survey. Additionally, local authorities cannot reduce speed limits by more than five miles per hour from the proposed limit or below the previous limit. For the first 30 days following the implementation of a lower speed limit, only warning citations may be issued for speeds exceeding the limit by 10 mph or less.
CVC 22358.9: This allows local governments to set speed limits of 20 mph or 25 mph on streets adjacent to “business activity districts” zoned for commercial use. Certain criteria must be met for these streets, including a limit of four traffic lanes and the requirement that the speed limit immediately before and after the district does not exceed 5 mph higher.
CVC 22358 (Amendment): State and local authorities may now set speed limits of 20 mph or 15 mph when justified by a traffic survey, a reduction from the previous minimum of 25 mph.
With this understanding, staff compiled a list of recommended street segments for establishment of speed limits throughout the city and where a registered civil or traffic engineer has determined that current limits exceed reasonable safety standards. The Survey included a total of 125 segments for 56 streets. This consisted of approximately 200 miles of City maintained streets, which staff recommends designating 19.67 miles (9.84%) of those streets as part of the AB 43 designation of a Safety Corridor (which is less than the 20% maximum limit).
Staff recommends that 62 (50%) street segments have no change to the speed limit and 60 (48%) have decreases to the speed limit, and three (2%) have new speed limits. No increases to the speed limit are proposed. Increases and decreases in speed limits for streets are generally not indicative of any major change in motorists’ behavior or roadway conditions and can often be attributed to relatively minor variations in overall speeds during the study periods when compared to previous Surveys. The final list of locations and their proposed speed limits are included within Exhibit A of the Ordinance.
On October 7, 2024, staff introduced the Ordinance and proposed speed limits to the Traffic and Parking Commission. The Commission recommended the City Council approve the proposed Ordinance by a vote of 3-1, with one Commissioner absent.
To establish the Survey’s recommended speed limits, the CVC requires the local agency to adopt an ordinance. If adopted, the updated speed limits will become effective 30-days after the second reading of the Ordinance. Upon adoption, staff will initiate the replacement of speed limit signs and notify the OCSD of the new limits. Notably, for the first 30 days after a speed limit reduction, drivers exceeding the limit by 10 mph or less will only receive warning citations. Staff’s goal is to complete this within three months of the Ordinance's effective date.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Ordinance and accompanying budget resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adopting the proposed Ordinance would result in installing and removing speed limit signs. The estimated cost to complete the replacement speed limit signs is $25,000. Sufficient funds are not available in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget to support the recommended action. Therefore, staff is requesting the adoption of a budget resolution, which would add the funding needed to complete the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. XX – Establishment of Speed Limits
2. Budget Resolution 2024-XX
Initiated By: Tran Tran, Traffic Engineering Manager
Submitted By: Thomas Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
55136.00500\42758874.1
ATTACHMENT 1
55136.00500\42758874.1
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMIT S ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 22352 establishes default prima facie speed limits for certain types of streets and highways; and WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may make a determination, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, that a different speed limit would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe; and WHEREAS, in 2021, Assembly Bill 43 was signed into law, giving cities greater discretion to lower speed limits on roads, including state highways, that have been identified as “safety corridors” in order to reduce traffic collisions and injuries; and
WHEREAS, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. recently completed an engineering and traffic survey for the City of Lake Forest , in accordance with the requirements of Vehicle Code Section 627 and in conformance with the methodologies established by the California Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic study surveyed 125 different road segments on 56 different roadways to evaluate speed, street parking, stop sign and traffic signal locations, visibility issues, as well as traffic flow at intersections, crosswalks, railroad crossings, and unusual turning movements; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish new speed limits in the areas as determined appropriate based on the engineering and traffic study, and to confirm the prima facie speed limits for those segments as deemed appropriate by the engineering and traffic study; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the new speed limits will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the new speed limits are safe and reasonable; and
55136.00500\42758874.1
WHEREAS, a copy of the applicable engineering and traffic surveys are on file in the offices of the City Clerk and the City Engineer and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
FOREST DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are hereby found to be true and accurate and are incorporated into this Ordinance as findings of the City Council by this reference.
SECTION 2. Adoption. The recommended prima facie speed l imits indicated in the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits - City of Lake Forest, dated October 2024, incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby adopted. The Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits – City of Lake Forest, dated October 2024, is attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 3. Posting Signage. The Director of the Public Works Department is hereby authorized and directed to install and/or upgrade any or all appropriate signs giving notice of said speed limits.
SECTION 4 . Effective Date. This Ordinance No. ____ shall become effective thirty (30) days following its adoption and when appropriate signs giving notice of the new speed limits are posted on the streets and street segments affected by this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because the Ordinance does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA and because the Ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (State CEQA Guidelines sect ion 15060, subd. (c)(2), (3).) Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines a project as the whole of an action, which could potentially result in either a direct physical change, or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change, in the environment. Here, the Ordinance will not result in any construction or development, and it will not have any other effect that would physically change the environment. The Ordinance therefore does not qualify as a project subject to CEQA.
In the alternative, even if the Ordinance did qualify as a “project” under CEQA, it would be exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), which exempts projects from CEQA “[w]here it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a 55136.00500\42758874.1
significant effect on the environment.” Thus, even if the Ordinance could result in some physical change in the environment, the Ordinance is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance is based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at Lake Forest City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance, which can be given, effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 8. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within fifteen (15) days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Lake Forest, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ______ 2024 by the following vote, to wit:
MARK TETTEMER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MATTHEW E. RICHARDSON
55136.00500\42758874.1
CITY ATTORNEY
55136.00500\42758874.1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ____ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____ day of ____ 2024, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the ____ day of ____ 2024 by the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
55136.00500\42758874.1
EXHIBIT A
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
FOR SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
OCTOBER 2024
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA 92630
(949) 461-3480
PREPARED BY:
HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERS
17821 E. 17TH STREET, SUITE 245
TUSTIN, CA 92780
(714) 731-9455
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ i Traffic Engineer's Certification ...................................................................................................... ii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Basic Speed Law............................................................................................................................. 1 Prima Facie Speed Limits ............................................................................................................... 2 Business District ..............................................................................................................................2 Residence District ........................................................................................................................... 2 Assembly Bill 43............................................................................................................................. 3 Safety Corridor................................................................................................................................ 3 High Pedestrian & Bike Users ........................................................................................................ 3 Establishment of Speed Zones........................................................................................................ 3 Data Collection Procedures............................................................................................................. 4 Speed Zoning Methodology............................................................................................................ 4 Speed Zone Survey ......................................................................................................................... 5 Local Street Exemptions................................................................................................................. 6 Other Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 6 Radar Collection Time-Frames....................................................................................................... 6 Analysis Factors.............................................................................................................................. 6 Field Review ................................................................................................................................... 7 Collision History............................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 8 Safety Corridor Analysis..................................................................................................... 8 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes"............................................................................ 9 Support Explanations for "No Speed Limit Changes"...................................................... 13 Locations of New Speed Limit Postings........................................................................... 14 Support Explanations for "New Speed Limit Postings" ................................................... 14 Locations of "Speed Limit Reductions" ........................................................................... 15 Support Explanations for "Speed Limit Reductions" ....................................................... 17 Summary of Recommendations.....................................................................................................31 Appendix A – Speed Limit Map
Appendix B – For Each Street Segment in the Survey
Data Summary Sheet
Radar Speed Distribution Sheet
Appendix C – Certification
Radar Gun Certification
Technician Certification
1 CITY OF LAKE FOREST
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS
Introduction
In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) has been developed for the City of Lake Forest as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The work provided herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. The goal of the review was two-fold. The first was to review new roadway segments to determine if speed limit postings should be recommended. The second involved a determination as to whether changes in pre -existing conditions have occurred where older speed limits should be modified.
The requirement to perform E&TS for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC). CVC Section 40802 states that at least once every five (5), seven (7), or fourteen (14) years, States and local agencies should re -evaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways. E&TS must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits. If such a survey is not performed within five (5), seven (7) years, or fourteen (14) years as stated previously of the date of the preceding survey, then the new data and its use will constitute a "speed trap". Hence, evidence using such would not be admissible in court.
The definition of an E&TS is contained in Section 627 of the Vehicle Code and is as follows:
E&TS, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by State and local authorities. An E&TS shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of the following:
(a) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (b) Collision records.
(c) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The CVC has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understa nding of the "Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and "Intermediate Speed Zones".
Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350)
All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as:
2 "No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time -to-time and place-to-place and, therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust their driving behavior to fit the conditions encountered and must learn to do this with a minimum of assistance from the police. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions around them.
Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)
All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima fac ie speed limit when it is safe to do so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.
Certain prima facie limits are automatically established by law (CVC 22352), including a 15 miles per hour (mph) limit in alleys, blind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph speed limit in school zones when children are present on the route to or from school.
Business and residence districts are defined in the Vehicle Code as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Sections 235 and 515 define these regulations. A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether or not a valid business or residence district exists. The law does not require posting these prima facie limits that are readily apparent.
Business District (CVC 235)
A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occ upied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of business in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
Residence District (CVC 515)
A "residence district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists. 3 Assembly Bill 43
In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 43, it established two (2) new categories for consideration where it may be appropriate to reduce the speed limit by 5 mph. These were codified as CVC 22358.7 as explained in further detail below. The first category is for a street to be designated as a Safety Corridor; and the second category is for a street to be designated as a street with high concentrations of bicyclists and/or pedestrians. Based on the CVC, i t should be noted that two (2) new categories cannot be applied to Caltrans State highways. This exclusion would not apply to the City of Lake Forest because there are no Caltrans State highways in the City.
Safety Corridor (CVC 22358.7(a)(1))
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD ) defines a Safety Corridor to be a street where the highest number of fatalities and/or serious injury collisions occurs over a period of three (3) to five (5 ) years. Safety Corridors are limited to 20 percent of City maintained streets. Therefore, it may be appropriate that certain collisions involving vulnerable populations (i.e., children, seniors and persons with disabilities) are weighted more in order to prioritize which streets get the Safety Corridor designation. Streets designated as Safety Corridors may have the speed limit reduced by 5 mph.
High Pedestrian & Bike Users (CVC 22358.7(a)(2))
Based on the CA MUTCD, streets that have facilities that generate high concentration of pedestrian and bike users may have the speed limit reduced by 5 mph. Examples of these facilities include schools, parks, medical facilities, religious centers and shopping centers. It is important to note that only the portion within 1,320 feet of these types of facilities would qualify for the 5 mph speed reduction.
In accordance with the CA MUTCD, an acceptable alternative to high concentration of pedestrian and bike users is to identify the streets within the top 20 percent of fatalities and/or serious injuries collisions involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists over a period of three (3) to five (5) years.
Establishment of Speed Zones
The reason that speed limit areas and their required postings are done is to guard r easonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other similar laws, the limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reaso nable and safe. It is this type of information that is reflected in the analysis section of this report. Namely, posted speed limits are a reflection of that speed which most people deem to be safe as opposed to a minority of drivers who do not drive in a reasonable manner.
Speed zones are also established to advise of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the anal ytical data and collision history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit. 4 Data Collection Procedures
Speed evaluation data was collected at 125 different segments on 56 different roadways in the City of Lake Forest. These areas and the number of segments on each are described as follows:
1. Aliso Park Drive/
Northcrest Drive (1)
19. Lake Center Drive/
Mercury Road (1)
37. Portola Parkway (5)
38. Rancho Parkway (2)
2. Alton Parkway (4) 20. Lake Forest Drive (10) 39. Rancho Parkway South (1)
3. Aspan Street (1) 21. Lambert Street (1) 40. Regency Lane (1)
4. Bake Lane (1) 22. Los Alisos Boulevard (4) 41. Ridgeline Road (2)
5. Bake Parkway (10) 23. Monarch Boulevard (1) 42. Ridge Route Drive (4)
6. Burbank (1) 24. Montcliff Drive (1) 43. Rimhurst Drive (1)
7. Cañada Road (2) 25. Muirlands Boulevard (4) 44. Rockfield Boulevard (5)
8. Catalina (1) 26. Normandale Drive (1) 45. Rue De Fortuna (1)
9. Centre Drive (1) 27. Olympus (1) 46. Rue De Valore (1) 10 Cherry Avenue (1) 28. Ostermand Road (1) 47. Saddleback Ranch Road (3)
11. Civic Center Drive (1) 29. Overlake (1) 48. Santa Margarita Parkway (1)
12. Commercentre Drive (2) 30. Palmwood Drive (1) 49. Santiago Canyon Road (1)
13. Dimension Drive (2) 31. Paloma (1) 50. Serrano Road (3)
14. El Toro Road (11) 32. Paseo Sombra (1) 51. Serrano Summit Drive (1)
15. Glenn Ranch Road (2) 33. Paseo Tranquillo (1) 52. Tamarisk (1)
16. Gowdy Avenue (1) 34. Pauling (1) 53. Toledo Lane (1)
17. Jeronimo Lane (1) 35. Peachwood (1) 54. Toledo Way (3)
18. Jeronimo Road (4) 36. Pittsford Drive (1) 55. Towne Centre Drive (3)
56. Trabuco Road (5)
As described in various traffic engineering documents - including information provided by the State of California, t he individual locations on which radar data collection procedures used involved considerations for the following:
a. Stop sign or traffic signal locations;
b. Visibility issues;
c. Traffic flow at intersections, cross-traffic, major driveways, crosswalks, railroad crossings and unusual turning movements;
d. The influence of other traffic factors on the speed of cars: such as on street parking, roadway features, adjacent land uses, and lighting.
Speed Zoning Methodology
The CA MUTCD specifies a "short method " of determining speed limits on City and County through Highways, Arterial and Collector Roads Procedures. This short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorist speeds; one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective.
5 Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent three- to five-year collision rec ord, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, super -elevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
Speed Zone Survey
- Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a radar speed meter.
- A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducte d. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits.
- Speed measurements should be taken during off -peak hours on weekdays. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is impo rtant that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to sur vey traffic in both directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway center line.
- It is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey. This may result in excessive survey periods for low -volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted for a minimum of two (2) hours, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles.
- The CA MUTCD states that speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed can be selected directly from the data sheet. However, roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist or other roadway condi tions that may impact sight distance may result in a further reduction of 5 mph in the recommended speed limit.
- As a check on the validity of the proposed speed limit, an analysis should be made of the three- to five-year collision record for the sectio n of roadway under consideration. If this record shows an abnormally high percentage of collisions normally associated with excessive speeds, the proposed speed limit should be further reduced. It is a judgment situation, and will not usually be a factor.
- Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition areas. - Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadway development.
- Speed zoning should be coordinated between adjacent jurisdictions. 6 Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802)
Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an E&TS. The code is as follows:
"For the purpose of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definiti on shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions:
1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
2. Not more than one half mile of uninterrupted length.
3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
Other Considerations
Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices , roadway alignment, width surface conditions, collision history and any unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.
Radar Collection Time-Frames
The hours of radar operation were restricted to off -peak periods (when possible) for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather.
The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash of an unmarked vehicle with the meter - reading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar unit's calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork.
The radar operator and assistant recorded the speed meter readings for each location on Radar Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the appendix of this report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed.
Analysis Factors
Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These in clude the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below.
1. The CRITICAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic enginee rs have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits. 7 Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this case is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that ot her factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used, it not only conforms to that required by the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits.
2. The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greate st extent possible is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed.
3. The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED, or 50th percentile speed, represent s the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50 percent of the vehicles travel faster than the median speed , and 50 percent travel slower than the median speed. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution.
4. The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is that speed at or below which 15 percent of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the ve hicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the collision potential.
5. MODAL SPEED : The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution (the most). It serves as another useful m easure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits.
6. STANDARD DEVIATION : This is a mathematical element, which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the overall review of recommended speed limits and serves to verify the level of confidence of data used in making recommendations.
7. The MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the number of samples.
The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the speed distribution curves calculated for each survey location. These distribution curves represent a method of graphic analysis that compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling.
Field Review
In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is t hat existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually indicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed below:
8 1. Segment length, width and alignment
2. Level of pedestrian activity
3. Traffic flow characteristics
4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves.
5. Driver sight distance constraints.
6. Adjacent residential/commercial/industrial etc. zoning.
7. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors
8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on street parking;
9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;
10. Roadway conditions, bumps and dips;
11. Obstructions to pedestrian visibility;
12. Land use and proximity of schools;
13. Uniformity and continuity with existing speed zones to/with adjacent jurisdictions;
14. Any other unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The results of the field review of related road/traffic variables are summarized on the E&TS forms found in the Appendix of this report.
Collision History
The E&TS forms summarize the available five-year collision information for the subject stre ets.
The collision information includes the total number of collisions within each street segment and of those collisions, the number that are speed-related, involved fatalities, serious injuries, pedestrians and bicyclists. This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the City of Lake Forest . To provide an equitable comparison between street segments, the collision data was converted to collisions per million vehicle miles.
Results and Recommendations
The following Summaries: Safety Corridor analysis, No Speed Limit Changes, New Speed Limit Postings, Speed Limit Reductions and Summary of Recommendations , present the results of the radar survey for the selected 125 locations. As shown, the Summary of Recommendations chart presents the necessary analysis elements that in addition to the field review of a registered Traffic Engineer led to the recommendations indicated.
Safety Corridor Analysis
In accordance with the CVC and CA MUTCD, the Safety Corridor designation is limited to 20 percent of City maintained streets. In the City of Lake Forest , there are approximately 200 miles of City maintained streets. These do not include private streets that are maintained by the various Homeowner Associations (HOAs). A maximum of 40.0 miles of City streets can be designated as a Safety Corridor.
Based on an analysis of all 12 5 street segments, collision history and street prioritization, the following 32 streets in the Table below are recommended to be designated as Safety Corridors.
Collectively, the Safety Corridors have a total of 19.67 miles, which is less than the maximum of
40.0 miles.
9 STREET LOCATION MILES
Alton Parkway West City Limits to Towne Centre Dr (West) 0.90 Bake Parkway North Pointe Dr to Commercentre Dr 0.48
Cherry Avenue Jeronimo Rd to Trabuco Rd 0.94
El Toro Road
Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd 0.60
Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way 0.39
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd 0.42
Trabuco Rd to Aliso Park Dr 0.36
Aliso Park Dr to Northcrest Dr 0.47
Northcrest Dr to Normandale Dr 0.99
Portola Pkwy/Santa Margarita Pkwy to
Marguerite Pkwy 0.61
Glenn Ranch Rd to Ridgeline Rd 0.87
Glenn Ranch Road Portola Pkwy to Saddleback Ranch Rd 0.92 Jeronimo Road Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.50
El Toro Rd to Los Alisos Blvd 0.48
Lake Forest Dr
Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd 0.35
Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way 0.35
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd 0.74
Trabuco Rd to Pittsford Dr 0.71
Pittsford Dr to Dimension Dr 0.71
Dimension Dr to Towne Centre Dr 0.80
Portola Pkwy to Bake Pkwy 0.36
Muirlands Boulevard Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.57
Ridge Route Drive Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd 0.50 Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd 0.55
Rockfield Boulevard Ridge Route Dr to Cavanaugh Rd 0.44 Santiago Canyon Road Ridgeline Rd to North City Limit 0.87 Serrano Road
Toledo Way to Lake Forest Dr 0.85
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr 0.41
Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.44
Trabuco Road
Bake Pkwy to Peachwood 0.85
Peachwood to Lake Forest Dr 0.85
Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.39
TOTAL 19.67
Locations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The Summary indicates that 62 of the 125 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. The reason centers mostly on the fact that the newly measured values of the 85th percentile and the 10 MPH pace are still within the parameters of the existing speed limits. Additional factors such as reduc ed sight distance, higher than expected collision rates, high pedestrian and bicyclist traffic, area considered a safety corridor, and keeping continuity with the speeds of neighboring segments form the basis in some instances of our recommendation. Therefore, the current postings should remain as is. At seven (7) of these locations, only one direction of travel isposted and is listed for no change in the speed limit. Hence, the other direction should be posted for consistency. These segments noted as “install”, as well as the segments recommended for “No Change” are listed below:
10 Aliso Park Drive/Northcrest Drive
El Toro Rd (W) to El Toro Rd (E) Remain posted at 35 mph Alton Parkway
Towne Centre Dr/Rancho Pkwy South to SR 241 Remain posted at 50mph, Install EB SR 241 to Portola Pkwy Remain posted at50 mph
Portola Pkwy to Paloma/Romano Remain posted at 40 mph
Aspan Street
Muirlands Blvd to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 35mph Bake Lane
Toledo Ln to Jeronimo Ln Remain posted at 25mph
Bake Parkway
West City Limit (w/o Jeronimo Rd) to Toledo Way Remain posted at 50mph Toledo Way toTrabuco Rd Remain posted at 50 mph
Trabuco Rd to South Pointe Dr Remain posted at50 mph
Towne Centre Dr to Portola Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph, Install EB Rue De Fortuna to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 40 mph Burbank
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at35 mph
Cañada Road
Lake Forest Drive to Birenda Remain posted at 40 mph
Birenda to Dimension Dr Remain posted at 40 mph, Install EB Centre Drive
Rockfield Blvd to Aspan St Remain posted at 35 mph
Commercentre Drive
Alton Pkwy to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph
Bake Pkwy to Dimesion Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Dimension Drive
Monarch Blvd/Catalina to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 35 mph Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
El Toro Road
West City Limit (I-5 Fwy) to Rockfield Blvd Remain posted at 40 mph Glenn Ranch Rd to Ridgeline Rd Remain posted at 50 mph
Glenn Ranch Road
Saddleback Ranch Rd to El Toro Rd Remain posted at 50 mph Gowdy Avenue
Cavanaugh Rd to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 30 mph
11 Jeronimo Lane
Bake Ln to Cayuga Ln Remain posted at 25 mph
Jeronimo Road
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Lake Center Drive/Mercury Road
Lake Forest Dr to Rockfield Blvd Remain posted at 30 mph Lake Forest Drive
West City Limit (I-5 Fwy) to Rockfield Blvd Remain posted at 40 mph Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Remain posted at 45 mph Towne Centre Drive to Portola Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph, Install EB Lambert Street
Aspan St to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 30 mph
Los Alisos Boulevard
Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Remain posted at 45 mph
Jeronimo Rd to Madero Remain posted at 45 mph
Montcliff Drive
Rimhurst Dr to El Toro Rd Remain Posted at 40 mph, Install SB Muirlands Blvd
North City Limit (650’ s/o Bake Pkwy) to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 45 mph Normandale Drive
Osterman Rd to El Toro Rd Remain posted at 35 mph
Osterman Road
Regency Ln to Pittsford Dr Remain posted at 35 mph
Overlake Drive
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 25 mph Paloma
Portola Pkwy to Alton Pkwy/Romano Remain posted at 35 mph Paseo Sombra
Trabuco Rd to Paseo Cipres Remain posted at 35 mph
Paseo Tranquill
Trabuco Rd to Paseo Cipres Remain posted at 35 mph
Pauling
Portola Pkwy at Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 35 mph
12 Peachwood
Trabuco Rd to Tamerisk Remain posted at 45 mph
Portola Pkwy
SR 241 to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Lake Forest Dr to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph
Bake Pkwy to Alton Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph
Alton Pkwy to North City Limit Remain posted at 45 mph, Install NB Rancho Parkway
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Rancho Parkway South
Alton Pkwy Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 40 mph
Regency Lane
Lake Forest Dr to Normandale Dr Remain posted at 35 mph Ridgeline Road
Santiago Canyon Rd to Saddleback Ranch Rd Remain posted at 35 mph Saddleback Rancho Rd to El Toro Rd Remain posted at 40 mph Rimhurst Drive
Trabuco Rd to Rimgate Dr Remain posted at 25 mph
Rockfield Boulevard
Cavanaugh Rd to Silverbay Dr Remain posted at 40 mph
Silverbay Dr to Los Alisos Blvd Remain posted at 40 mph Rue De Fortuna
Bake Pkwy to Rue De Valore Remain posted at 35 mph
Rue De Valore
Lake Forest Dr to Rue De Fortuna Remain posted at 35 mph Toledo Lane
Bake Ln to Cul-De-Sac Remain posted at 25 mph
Toledo Way
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 45 mph Towne Centre Drive
Alton Pkwy to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 35 mph
Bake Pkwy to Portola Pkwy/Pauling Remain posted at 35 mph, Install SB Trabuco Road
El Toro Rd to South City Limit Remain posted at 45 mph
13 Support Explanations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The following are support explanations for the roadway segments that the recommended speed limit is 5 mph or more lower than the newly measured 85 th percentile speed. Also, menti oned below are those segments that have posted speed signs in only one direction. For enforcement, it is recommended that an appropriate speed limit sign be installed.
Alton Parkway
3 - Towne Centre Drive/Rancho Parkway South to SR 241
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 0.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 50 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
Bake Parkway
15 - Towne Centre Drive to Portola Parkway
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
Cañada Road
20 - Birenda to Dimension Drive
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 40 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
El Toro Road
39 - Glenn Ranch Road to Ridgeline Road
This segment of El Toro Road is a two -lane rural roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), a bike trail and open land. Field notes state that the roadway has a slight to gradual horizontal and vertical cur ves, areas of no shoulders, no stopping any time and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.
Lake Forest Drive
57 - Towne Centre Drive to Portola Parkway
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
14 Montcliff Drive
65 - Rimhurst Drive to El Toro Road
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 30 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.
Portola Parkway
85 - Alton Parkway to North City Limit
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the northbound direction.
Towne Centre Drive
120 - Bake Parkway to Portola Parkway/Pauling
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 35 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.
Locations of “New Speed Limit Postings”
Two (2) locations are currently un-posted. It is noted that for those cases, the recommendation to post is necessary to enhance the enforcement of the recommended speed limit. And although Civic Center Drive does have existing speed limit signs of 25 mph, it is unen forceable because there was no prior speed survey to establish the speed limit. Based on the speed data the segments listed below are recommended to post /install such speed limit signs for both directions and is identified in the Summary of Recommendations.
Civic Center Drive
Commercentre Dr to Olympus Post a 35 mph Speed Limit
Olympus
Serrano Summit Dr to Civic Center Dr Post a 25 mph Speed Limit Serrano Summit Drive
Commercentre Dr to Olympus Post a 35 mph Speed Limit
Support Explanations of “New Speed Limit Postings”
Civic Center Drive
24 - Commercentre Drive to Olympus
This segment of Civic Center Drive is a two -lay roadway. The adjacent land uses are City Hall, commercial, industrial and some residential (non-fronting). Field notes statethe roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 37.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 28 to 37 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for thissegment.
15 Olympus
71 - Serrano Summit Drive to Civic Center Drive
This segment of Olympus is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and City Hall. Field notes state that the roadway has roundabouts at Serrano Summit Drive and Civic Center Drive and has heave on -street parking. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 20 to 29 mph, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
Serrano Summit Drive
112 - Commercentre Drive to Olympus
This segment of Serrano Summit Drive is a two-lay roadway. The adjacent land uses are club house, community pool, residential (non-fronting) and commercial. Field notes state the roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 39.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 31 to 40 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
Locations of “Speed Limit Reductions”
At 60 locations, the E&TS data indicates a need for a speed limit reduction. T he newly measured values of the 85 th percentile speeds, the 10 mph pace range, roadway characteristics such as horizontal/vertical curves, limited sight distance, and to keep consistency with speeds of adjacent segments, or high collision rates were factors used to make these recommendations. These segments and reasons for the recommendations are explained below:
Alton Parkway
Commercentre Dr to Towne Centre Dr (W) Reduce from 55mph to 50 mph Bake Parkway
South Pointe Dr to North Pointe Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50mph North Pointe Dr to Commercentre Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Commercentre Dr to Dimension Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Dimension Dr to Towne Centre Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Portola Pkwy to Rue De Fortuna Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Catalina
Alton Pkwy to Dimension Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Cherry Avenue
Jeronimo Rd to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph
El Toro Road
Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Trabuco Rd to Aliso Park Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Aliso Park Dr to Northcrest Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Northcrest Dr to Normandale Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph 16 El Toro Road (continued)
Normandale Dr to Portola /Santa Margarita Pkwy Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Portola/Santa Margarita Pkwy to Marguerite Pkwy Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Glenn Ranch Road
Portola Pkwy to Saddleback Ranch Rd Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Jeronimo Road
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph El Toro Rd to Los Alisos Blvd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Lake Forest Drive
Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Trabuco Rd to Pittsford Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Pittsford Dr to Dimension Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Dimension Dr to Towne Centre Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Portola Pkwy to Bake Pkwy Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph
Los Alisos Boulevard
West City Limit (I-5 Fwy) to Rockfield Blvd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Monarch Boulevard
Alton Pkwy to Dimension Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Muirlands Boulevard
Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph El Toro Rd to Los Alisos Blvd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Palmwood Drive
Peachwood (N) to Peachwood (S) Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Pittsford Drive
Northcrest Dr to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Portola Pkwy
El Toro Rd to SR 241 Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Rancho Parkway
Lake Forest Dr to Portola Pkwy Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Ridge Route Drive
Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph
17 Rockfield Boulevard
North City Limit to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Ridge Route Dr to Cavanaugh Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Saddleback Ranch Road
Glenn Ranch Rd to Millwood Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Millwood Rd to Pendleton Rd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Pendleton Rd to Ridgeline Rd Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Santa Margarita Pkwy
El Toro Rd to South City Limit Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Santiago Canyon Road
Ridgeline Rd to North City Limit Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Serrano Road
Toledo Way to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Tamerisk
Peachwood (S) to Peachwood (N) Reduce from 30 mph to 25 mph Toledo Way
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Towne Centre Drive
Alton Pkwy (W) to Alton Pkwy (E) Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Trabuco Road
Bake Pkwy to Peachwood Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph
Peachwood to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Support Explanations for “Speed Limit Reductions”
Alton Parkway
2 – Commercentre Drive to Towne Centre Drive (W)
This segment of Alton Parkway is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 61.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 60 m ph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. I n accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 60 mph speed limit be reduced to 55 mph.
18 Bake Parkway
11 - South Pointe Drive to North Pointe Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and a church. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 54.2 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 46 to 55 mph, i t is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
12 - North Pointe Drive to Commercentre Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 55.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
13 - Commercentre Drive to Dimension Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. Field observations included bike lanes, no stopping any time, g radual to moderate horizontal-vertical roadway curves and areas of limited sight distance at roadway curves. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 48 to 57 mph.
With areas of limited sight distance and to main tain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph. 14 - Dimension Drive to Towne Centre Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and residential (non -fronting). Field observations include bike lanes, no stopping any time, and slight to gradual roadway curves. The speed data shows a n 85th percentile speed of
56.6 mph, which may suggest a speed lim it of 55 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
16 - Portola Parkway to Rue De Fortuna
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and a library. Field notes include a constant slight “C” curve. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.1 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Catalina
21 - Alton Parkway to Dimension Drive
This segment of Catalina is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non -fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sw eeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of
39.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this 19 segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Cherry Avenue
23 - Jeronimo Road to Trabuco Road
This segment of Cherry Avenue is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile s peed of 37.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City th at involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph spee d limit be reduced to 30 mph.
El Toro Road
30 - Rockfield Boulevard to Muirlands Boulevard
The segment of El Toro Road is an eight -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, commercial and residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows a n 85th percentile speed of
47.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 13 speed -related collisions, four (4) involved a serious injury, six (6) involved a pedestrian and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
31 - Muirlands Boulevard to Jeronimo Road
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, church, fire station and residential (non -fronting). A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had seven (7) speed -related collisions and three (3) involved a bicyclist. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.3 mph and 10 mph pace range of 45 to 54 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
32 - Jeronimo Road to Toledo Way
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adj acent land uses are business and residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed -related coll ision, one (1) involved a serious injury and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 33 - Toledo Way to Trabuco Road
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adj acent land use is residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a 20 speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed-related collisions, three (3) involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
34 - Trabuco Road to Aliso Park Drive
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjace nt land use is residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station. The speed data shows a n 85th percentile speed of
54.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 35 - Aliso Park Drive to Northcrest Drive
This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) t o three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land use is residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions and three (3) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
36 - Northcrest Drive to Normandale Drive
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had eight (8) speed -related collisions and one (1) fatality collision, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
37 - Normandale Drive to Portola Parkway/Santa Margarita Parkway This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. T he adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 50 to 59 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed -related collisions and one (1) collision involved a pedestrian. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
38 - Portola Parkway/Santa Margarita Parkway to Marguerite Parkway This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 57.4 mph, which may suggest a s peed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history 21 revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
Glenn Ranch Road
40 - Portola Parkway to Saddleback Ranch Road
This segment of Glenn Ranch Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, park and open sp ace. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
Jeronimo Road
45 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and an int ermediate school. Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph. 46 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collisi on history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1 ), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
47 - El Toro Road to Los Alisos Boulevard
This segment of Je ronimo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, park and a driving range. Field notes state that the roadway has slight horizontal and vertical curves, bike lanes and no stopping any time. The speed d ata shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had five (5) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicycl ist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Lake Forest Drive
51 - Muirlands Boulevard to Jeronimo Road
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and mobile home park (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed -related collisions, one ( 1) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segme nt is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
52 - Jeronimo Road to Toledo Way
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a s ix-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a club house. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment h ad one (1) speed -related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1 ), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 53 - Toledo Way to Trabuco Road
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of
52.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed -related collisions, two (2) inv olved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance w ith CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 54 - Trabuco Road to Pittsford Drive
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, commercial and a church. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A revi ew of the collision history revealed that this segment had nine (9) speed -related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, three (3) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the t op locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
23 55 - Pittsford Drive to Dimension Drive
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station. The speed dat a shows an 85th percentile speed of
52.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions, one (1) inv olved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist , which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 56 - Dimension Drive to Towne Centre Drive
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and hotels. Th e speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 58 - Portola Parkway to Bake Parkway
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is sole ly commercial. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 49.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of t he top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Los Alisos Boulevard
60 - West City Limits (I-5 Freeway) to Rockfield Boulevard This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), SCE sub-station and a water district. Field notes state the roadway has slight to gradual curves, no stopping any time, bike lanes and bus stops. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.4 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 61 - Rockfield Boulevard to Muirlands Boulevard
This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (n on-fronting), park and church. Field notes show that this segment has conflicting speed limits with a 45 mph speed limit posted in the eastbound direction and a 50 mph speed limit posted in the westbound direction. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 39 to 48 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 24 Monarch Bouleard
64 - Alton Parkway to Dimension Drive
This segment of Monarch Bolevard is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non -fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sweeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch o f this segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Muirlands Boulevard
68 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non -fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had four (4) speed -related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) collision involved a serious injury, (1) involved a pedestrian, and (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph. 69 - El Toro Road to Los Alisos Boulevard
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial at El Toro Road and parks and intermediate at Los Ali sos Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bik e users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school, park or commercial shopping center within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Palmwood Drive
74 - Peachwood (N) to Peachwood (S)
This segment of Palmwood Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is multifamily residential. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 33.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 25 to 34 mph, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Pittsford Drive
80 - Northcrest Drive to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Pittsford Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are resi dential (non-fronting), parks and a elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “hi gh concentrations of pedestrians and 25 bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or park within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Portola Parkway
81 - El Toro Road to SR 241
This segment of Portola Parkway is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, church and residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th p ercentile speed of
51.0 mph and 10 mph pace range of 43 to 52 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments on Portola Parkway and Santa Margarita Parkway, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
Rancho Parkway
87 - Lake Forest Drive to Portola Parkway
This segment of Rancho Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, skate park, volleyball center, Sherriff’s Station and community park. Field notes state that there is heavy pedestrian traffic to the volleyball center and skate park, heavy on -street parking, areas of red curbs and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of
46.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. How ever, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a community park, a skate park and volleyball center within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Ridge Route Drive
92 - Rockfield Boulevard to Muirlands Boulevard
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 42.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 223 58.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 93 - Muirlands Boulevard to Jeronimo Road
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), club house, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collision s. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 26 94 - Jeronimo Road to Toledo Way
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.6 mph and 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph. To maintain consistency wi th speed limits of 35 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 95 - Toledo Way to Trabuco Road
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting), an elementary school and high school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 42.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high con centrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.
Rockfield Boulevard
97 - North City Limit to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are dense commercial and business. Field notes include short distances between inters ection, no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of
43.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
98 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial. Field notes include no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph and 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 40 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph. 99 - Ridge Route Drive to Cavanaugh Road
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Saddleback Ranch Road
104 - Glenn Ranch Road toMillwood Road
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) with a school nearby. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 37 to 46 m ph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
27 105 - Millwood Road to Pendleton Road
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and an elementary school. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, slight to gradual horizontal and vertical curves, areas of limited sight distance and no stopping any time except in front of the school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 44.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For t he entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.
106 - Pendleton Road to Ridgeline Road
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non -fronting), club house pool and pickleball courts and elementary school at Pendleton Road. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, gradual to constant horizontal and vertical curves, and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 37.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph sp eed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Santa Margarita Parkway
107 - El Toro Road to South City Limit
This segment of Santa Margarita Parkway has three (3) to four (4) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school at the south City limit in the City of Mission Viejo. Field observations include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, bike lane and no stopping any time. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 51.2 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
Santiago Canyon Road
108 - Ridgeline Road to North City Limit
This segment of Santiago Canyon Road is a rural two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial at Live Oak Canyon Road and open undeveloped land. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1 ), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph. 28 Serrano Road
109 - Toledo Way to Lake Forest Drive
This se gment of Serrano Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), Serrano Creek park, an elementary school, and business at Lake Forest Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 41.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) collisions involved in a serious injury, and one involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.
110 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Serrano Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of
38.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision and one (1) involved in a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/ or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
111 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Serrano Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), high school and business at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 39.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existi ng 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Tamerisk
113 - Peachwood (S) to Peachwood (N)
This segment of Tamerisk is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting). Field notes state that the roadway has gradual to sweeping h orizontal curves.
With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 29.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 23 to 32 mph, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.
Toledo Way
115 - Bake Parkway to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Toledo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a tennis club. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of
48.7 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 41 to 50 mph, it is recommended that th e existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
29 117 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Toledo Way is a four -lane roadway. The adja cent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field observations include school age ped estrians. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 45.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph.
However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike use rs”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Towne Centre Drive
118 - Alton Parkway (W) to Alton Parkway (E)
This segment of Towne Centre Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial and a small section of residential (non -fronting). With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Trabuco Road
121 - Bake Parkway to Peachwood
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land us es are residential (non-fronting), commercial, church and cemetery. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph. 122 - Peachwood to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six -lane roa dway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of
52.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), thi s segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 123 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Trabu co Road is a six -lane arterial. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.2 mph and 10 mph pace range of 42 to 51 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 124 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road and Ridge Route Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a 30 fatality, two (2) involved a pedestrian, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
31 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 2024
STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
ALISO PARK DR-NORTHCREST DR
1 WEST EL TORO RD TO
EAST EL TORO RD 35 / *25 35 39.8 35.4 32-41 75.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
ALTON PARKWAY
2 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO PKWY S 60 55 61.4 56.6 53-62 68.1 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 3 TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO PKWY S
TO SR-241 50 50 50.4 46.3 42-51 77.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 4 SR-241 TO
PORTOLA PKWY 50 50 51.6 47.0 44-53 69.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 5 PORTOLA PKWY TO
PALOMA-ROMANO 40 40 42.8 38.1 35-44 76.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
ASPAN STREET
6 MUIRLANDS BL TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 35 38.2 33.4 28-37 72.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
BAKE LANE
7 TOLEDO LANE TO
JERONIMO LANE 25 25 29.7 24.8 21-30 74.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
BAKE PARKWAY
8 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
TOLEDO WAY 50 50 51.2 46.8 44-53 72.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 9 TOLEDO WAY TO
TRABUCO RD 50 50 53.0 48.9 45-54 76.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 10 TRABUCO RD TO
SOUTH POINTE DR 50 50 52.1 48.4 45-53 80.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 11 SOUTH POINTE DR TO
NORTH POINTE DR 55 50 54.2 49.7 46-55 68.9 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
32 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
BAKE PKWY Continued
12 NORTH POINTE DR TO
COMMERCENTRE DTR 55 50 55.4 50.5 48-57 69.3 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 13 COMMERCENTRE DR TO
DIMENSION DR 55 50 55.9 52.1 48-57 79.9 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 14 DIMENSION DR TO
TOWNE CENTRE DR 55 50 56.6 52.5 48-57 74.9 REDUCE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED LIMIT 15 TOWNE CENTRE DR TO
PORTOLA PKWY 45 WB 45 43.9 40.0 36-45 81.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST EB 16 PORTOLA PKWY TO
RUE DE FORTUNA 45 40 44.1 40.2 36-45 78.7 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 17 RUE DE FORTUNA TO
LAKE FOREST DR 40 40 42.9 38.6 34-43 75.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
BURBANK
18 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 35 36.3 32.5 28-37 85.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE CAÑADA ROAD
19 LAKE FOREST DR TO
BIRENDRA 40 40 42.4 39.0 35-44 86.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 20 BIRENDRA TO
DIMENSION DR 40 40 41.6 37.5 33-42 79.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
CATALINA
21 ALTON PKWY TO
DIMENSION DR 35 30 39.9 34.9 31-40 76.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
CENTRE DRIVE
22 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
ASPAN ST 35 35 34.8 29.1 24-33 73.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE WB = WESTBOUND
33 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
CHERRY AVENUE
23 JERONIMO RD TO
TRABUCO RD 35 30 37.7 32.8 29-38 73.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
24 COMMERCENTRE DR TO
OLYMPUS NP 35 37.5 31.4 28-37 65.9 ESTABLISH AND POST 35 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE
COMMERCECENTRE DRIVE
25 ALTON PKWY TO
BAKE PKWY 45 45 47.2 42.5 38-47 79.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 26 BAKE PKWY TO
DIMENSION DR 45 45 46.0 42.2 38-47 75.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
DIMENSION DRIVE
27 MONARCH BLVD-CATALINA TO
BAKE PKWY 35 35 37.1 32.6 30-39 73.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 28 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 47.1 43.0 39-48 69.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
EL TORO ROAD
29 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 40 40 42.0 36.4 33-42 61.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 30 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLANDS BLVD 45 40 47.0 42.2 39-48 65.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 31 MUIRLANDS BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 50 45 53.3 48.0 45-54 61.3 REDUCE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED LIMIT 32 JERONIMO RD TO
TOLEDO WAY 50 45 54.9 50.5 47-56 72.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 33 TOLEDO WAY TO
TRABUCO RD 50 45 54.9 49.4 46-55 63.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 34 TRABUCO RD TO
ALISO PARK DR 50 45 54.1 49.0 45-54 67.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 35 ALISO PARK DR TO
NORTHCREST DR 55 50 58.6 52.6 49-58 57.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR NP = NOT POSTED
34 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
EL TORO ROAD Continued
36 NORTHCREST DR TO
NORMANDALE DR 55 50 58.6 53.5 50-59 65.2 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 37 NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA
PKWY/SANTA MARGARITA PKWY 55 50 59.9 53.7 50-59 58.4 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 38 PORTOLA PKWY/SANTA MARGARITA
PKWY TO MARGUERITE PKWY 55 50 57.4 52.1 50-59 61.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 39 GLENN RANCH RD TO
RIDGELINE RD 50 50 55.5 49.6 46-55 63.7 NO CHANGE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
GLENN RANCH ROAD
40 PORTOLA PKWY TO
SADDLEBACK RANCH RD 55 50 59.0 54.5 51-60 73.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 41 SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO
EL TORO RD 50 50 52.0 48.1 43-52 76.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
GOWDY AVENUE
42 CAVANAUGH RD TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 30 30 31.7 28.5 24-33 87.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
JERONIMO LANE
43 BAKE LANE TO
CAYUGA LANE 25 25 27.8 23.5 18-27 78.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
JERONIMO ROAD
44 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 49.2 44.4 41-50 76.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 45 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 / *25 40 46.6 42.4 38-47 80.7 REDUCE– CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS 46 RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 45 40 46.5 42.3 38-47 77.2 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 47 EL TORO RD TO
LOS ALISOS BLVD 45 40 45.8 41.3 37-46 76.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
35 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
LAKE CENTRE DR-MERCURY RD
48 LAKE FOREST DR TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 30 30 31.1 26.4 23-32 71.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
LAKE FOREST DRIVE
49 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 40 40 40.5 36.0 32-41 71.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 50 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLANDS BLVD 45 45 46.6 42.8 39-48 78.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 51 MUIRLANDS BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 50 45 54.9 50.1 47-56 71.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 52 JERONIMO RD TO
TOLEDO RD 50 45 53.5 48.7 44-53 71.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 53 TOLEDO RD TO
TRABUCO RD 50 45 52.9 48.6 45-54 74.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 54 TRABUCO RD TO
PITTSFORD DR 50 45 52.5 47.9 45-54 64.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 55 PITTSFORD DR TO
DIMENSION DR 50 45 52.8 47.1 43-52 62.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 56 DIMENSION DR TO
TOWNE CENTRE DR 50 45 52.5 48.0 45-54 69.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 57 TOWNE CENTRE DR TO
PORTOLA PKWY 45 WB 45 46.2 42.3 38-47 82.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 58 PORTOLA PKWY TO
BAKE PKWY 45 40 49.3 44.9 41-50 79.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
LAMBERT STREET
59 ASPAN ST TO
LAKE FOREST DR 30 30 33.1 26.4 21-30 67.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE WB = WESTBOUND
36 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD
60 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 50 45 44.4 39.0 35-44 65.6 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 61 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLANDS BLVD
45EB &
50WB 45 48.3 43.1 39-48 65.5 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE – REMOVE 50 MPH SIGN WB 62 MUIRLANDS BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 45 / *25 45 48.0 43.5 40-49 72.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 63 JERONIMO RD TO
MADERO 45 45 47.4 43.3 40-49 73.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
MONARCH BOULEVARD
64 ALTON PKWY TO
DIMENSION DR 35 30 39.7 35.2 33-42 77.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
MONTCLIFF DRIVE
65 RIMHURST DR TO
EL TORO RD 30 30 31.1 26.7 23-32 81.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD
66 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 49.8 44.3 40-49 67.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 67 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 45 46.7 41.6 38-47 71.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 68 RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 45 40 48.3 44.3 40-49 82.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 69 EL TORO RD TO
LOS ALISOS BLVD 45 40 46.8 42.6 39-48 74.2 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
NORMANDALE STREET
70 OSTERMAN RD TO
EL TORO RD 35 35 39.6 34.7 29-38 74.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
OLYMPUS
71 SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO
CIVIC CENTER DR NP 25 27.0 23.6 20-29 91.4 ESTABLISH AND POST 25 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE EB = EASTBOUND, WB = WESTBOUND, NP = NOT POSTED, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE 37 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
OSTERMAN ROAD
72 REGENCY LANE TO
PITTSFORD DR 35 35 36.2 32.6 28-37 79.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
OVERLAKE
73 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 25 25 29.7 24.6 20-29 83.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PALMWOOD DRIVE
74 PEACHWOOD (N) TO
PEACHWOOD (S) 35 30 33.9 28.7 25-34 78.0 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE PALOMA
75 PORTOLA PKWY TO
ALTON PKWY 35 35 39.6 35.0 32-41 72.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PASEO SOMBRA
76 TRABUCO RD TO
PASEO CIPRES 35 35 35.8 32.1 28-37 74.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PASEO TRANQUILO
77 TRABUCO RD TO
PASEO CIPRES 35 35 36.8 32.4 29-38 77.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PAULING
78 PORTOLA PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 35 39.6 35.6 31-40 81.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PEACHWOOD
79 TRABUCO RD TO
TAMARISK (E) 45 45 47.4 43.2 38-47 68.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PITTSFORD DRIVE
80 NORTHCREST DR TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 / *25 30 39.1 34.6 30-39 80.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone
38 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
PORTOLA PARKWAY
81 EL TORO RD TO
SR-241 50 45 51.0 46.5 43-52 67.5 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY WITH SANTA MARGARITA PKWY 82 SR-241 TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 48.1 43.5 39-48 71.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 83 LAKE FOREST DR TO
BAKE PKWY 45 45 47.3 43.1 39-48 73.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 84 BAKE PKWY TO
ALTON PKWY 45 45 47.3 42.5 38-47 72.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 85 ALTON PKWY TO
NORTH CITY LIMIT 45 45 49.3 44.4 39-48 73.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RANCHO PARKWAY
86 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 47.3 43.2 39-48 71.5 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 87 LAKE FOREST DR TO
PORTOLA PKWY 45 40 46.7 42.3 38-47 72.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH
88 ALTON PKWY TO
BAKE PKWY 40 40 44.9 39.0 35-44 70.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
REGENCY LANE
89 LAKE FOREST DR TO
NORMANDALE DR 35 35 39.9 36.0 31-40 82.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RIDGELINE ROAD
90 SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO
SADDLEBACK RANCH RD 35 35 37.9 33.8 29-38 80.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 91 SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO
EL TORO RD 40 40 42.2 38.3 34-43 82.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 39 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE
92 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLAND BLVD 40 35 42.9 38.4 34-43 76.5 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 93 MUIRLAND BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 40 35 43.1 38.3 35-44 72.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 94 JERONIMO RD TO
TOLEDO WAY 40 / *25 35 43.6 39.3 35-44 78.3 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 95 TOLEDO WAY TO
TRABUCO RD 40 / *25 35 42.4 38.1 34-43 75.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
RIMHURST DRIVE
96 TRABUCO RD TO
RIMGATE DR 25 25 29.8 25.6 21-30 80.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD
97 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 40 43.5 39.0 36-45 82.3 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 98 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 40 45.8 40.3 36-45 73.5 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 99 RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
CAVANAUGH RD 45 40 46.1 41.6 37-46 76.0 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 100
CAVANAUGH RD TO
SILVERBAY DR 40 40 40.7 34.4 30-39 67.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 101
SILVERBAY DR TO
LOS ALISOS BL 40 40 43.5 38.7 35-44 79.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RUE DE FORTUNA
102
BAKE PKWY TO
RUE DE VALORE 35 / *25 35 39.2 34.1 29-38 70.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RUE DE VALORE
103
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RUE DE FORTUNA 35 35 37.8 33.1 29-38 73.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone
40 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
AVERAGE
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD
104
GLENN RANCH RD TO
MILLWOOD RD 45 40 44.6 41.1 37-46 82.9 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 105
MILLWOOD RD TO
PENDLETON RD 40 / *25 35 44.5 40.7 37-46 79.5 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS 106
PENDLETON RD TO
RIDGELINE RD 35 / *25 30 37.8 32.8 28-37 74.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY
107
EL TORO RD TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 50 45 51.2 46.6 43-52 72.3 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD
108
RIDGELINE RD TO
NORTH CITY LIMITS 55 50 59.1 53.0 49-58 66.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
SERRANO ROAD
109
TOLEDO WAY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 40 / *25 35 41.5 37.5 34-43 83.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 110
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 35 / *25 30 38.9 34.8 31-40 78.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 111
RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 35 / *25 30 39.3 34.7 31-40 74.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE
112
COMMERCENTRE DR TO
OLYMPUS NP 35 39.9 35.3 31-40 78.8 ESTABLISH AND POST 35 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE
TAMARISK
113
PEACHWOOD SOUTH TO
PEACHWOOD NORTH 30 25 29.9 26.3 23-32 81.8 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE
TOLEDO LANE
114
BAKE PKWY TO
CUL-DE-SAC 25 25 27.0 23.4 19-28 86.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone , NP = NOT POSTED 41 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
AVERAGE
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
TOLEDO WAY
115
BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 50 45 48.7 44.6 41-50 78.0 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 116
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 / *25 45 48.3 43.9 39-48 73.5 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 117
RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 45 / *25 40 45.5 41.0 37-46 74.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
118
ALTON PKWY WEST TO
ALTON PKWY EAST 45 40 44.9 40.2 35-44 70.3 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 119
ALTON PKWY EAST TO
BAKE PKWY 35 35 39.0 34.6 30-39 81.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 120
BAKE PKWY TO
PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING 35 35 38.9 34.7 32-41 79.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
TRABUCO ROAD
121
BAKE PKWY TO
PEACHWOOD 55 50 55.5 48.3 44-53 60.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 122
PEACHWOOD TO
LAKE FOREST DR 50 45 52.4 48.5 45-54 80.5 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 123
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 50 45 50.2 45.7 42-51 73.1 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 124
RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 50 45 50.4 44.8 42-51 73.3 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 125
EL TORO RD TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 45 45 48.5 44.1 40-49 70.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone
APPENDIX A
35 40
45 50
35 50
50 50
55 5050
40 50
40 50
50 50
40 35
40 35
35 30
30 45
40 45
45 50
45 50
50 50
50 50
50 30
45 40
40 40
45 45
45 45
45 45
45 40
30 45
454545
45 45
40 40
35 35
25 30
35 35
35 35
45 30
45 45
45 45
45 40
40 3535
40 35
3535
3525
40 40
40 40
40 40
35 35
50 35
30 30
30 45
45 45
40 40
35 50
45 45
45 45
25 50
25 30
25 35
40 45
40 35
SPEED LIMIT MAP
2024
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
45 45
45 30
40 40
45 45
30 30
55 60
40 35
2535
35 45
APPENDIX B
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALISO PARK DR - NORTHCREST DR EL TORO RD (W) TO EL TORO RD (E) DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.24
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO (W) / EL TORO (E)
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO (W) / PITTSFORD (sch) / EL TORO (E-sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy near Midcrest)
OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME
30 MIN PARKING SCHOOL DAYS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE (Midcrest to El Toro (E) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PARTIAL SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / MONTBURY PARK / ELEM SCHOOL (on Pittsford & Northcrest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Aliso Park-Northcrest 2024-01 The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.60 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALISO PARK DR - NORTHCREST DR EL TORO RD (W) TO EL TORO RD (E) DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.7% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.4% 98.3%
X X X 3 2.6% 94.8%
X X 2 1.7% 92.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 2.6% 94.8%
X X 2 1.7% 92.2%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 90.5%
40 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 81.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 73.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 65.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 54.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.6% 46.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.3% 37.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 27.6%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 19.8%
X X X X 4 3.4% 15.5%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 12.1%
X X 2 1.7% 6.9%
X X X 3 2.6% 5.2%
X 1 0.9% 2.6%
X X 2 1.7% 1.7%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. 0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 116
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
File: Aliso Park-Northcrest 2024-01
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALISO PARK DR - NORTHCREST DR EL TORO RD (W) TO EL TORO RD (E) DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.3%
43 X 94.8%
HCI
43 X 94.8%
42 X 92.2%
41 X 90.5% }PACE
40 X 86.2% }PACE
39 X 81.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 73.3% }PACE
37 X 65.5% }PACE
36 X 54.3% }PACE
35 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 37.9% }PACE
33 X 27.6% }PACE
32 X 19.8% }PACE
31 X 15.5%
30 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 6.9%
28 X 5.2%
27 X 2.6%
26 X 1.7%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. X 0.0% 22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
File: Aliso Park-Northcrest 2024-01
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT TO TOWNE CENTRE DR (W)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MONARCH
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 61.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 53 - 62 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 60 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.23
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE / MONARCH / CATALINA / TOWNE CTR-RANCHO (S)
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / MONARCH / CATALINA / TOWNE CTR-RANCHO (S) 23,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / MONARCH / CATALINA / TOWNE CTR-RANCHO (S)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
OVERHEAD PED XING (e/o Monarch)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-02
This segment of Alton Parkway is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 61.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 60 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 60 mph speed limit be reduced to 55 mph.
0.90 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT TO TOWNE CENTRE DR (W)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X X 2 0.8% 99.6%
X 1 0.4% 98.7%
65 X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 98.3%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 95.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.8% 92.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.9% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.5% 82.8%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.1% 77.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 8.8% 70.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.6% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 8.4% 53.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.3% 45.4%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.7% 39.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.7% 32.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.0% 25.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.2% 20.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.4% 16.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 3.8% 13.0%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 9.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.5% 6.3%
X X X X X 5 2.1% 3.8%
X X X 3 1.3% 1.7%
45 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 238
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 62 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 61.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 56.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.6 %
File: Alton 2024-02
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT TO TOWNE CENTRE DR (W)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 99.6%
66 X 98.7%
65 X 98.3%
64 X 95.4%
63 X 92.4%
62 X 88.7%
61 X 82.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
60 X 77.3% }PACE
59 X 70.2% }PACE
58 X 61.3% }PACE
57 X 53.8% }PACE
56 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
55 X 39.1% }PACE
54 X 32.4% }PACE
53 X 25.6% }PACE
52 X 20.6%
51 X 16.4%
50 X 13.0% - - - - - -15PCT
49 X 9.2%
48 X 6.3%
47 X 3.8%
46 X 1.7%
45 X 0.4%
44 X 0.0%
43 X 0.0%
HCI
43 X 0.0%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 62 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 61.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 56.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.6 %
A - 2
Alton 2024-02
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO (S) TO SR 241
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SR 241
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH (WB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.83
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
20,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOWNE CENTRE-RANCHO PKWY / SUNFLOWER / SR 241
CROSSWALKS AT TOWNE CENTRE-RANCHO PKWY
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-03
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 0.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 50 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.29 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO (S) TO SR 241
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
55 X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 97.7%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 94.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 92.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 88.5%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 76.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 56.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 47.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 38.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 29.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 17.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 17.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 11.5%
40 X X X X X X 6 3.4% 7.5%
X X X X 4 2.3% 4.0%
X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
0 0.0% 0.6%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.5 %
File: Alton 2024-03
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO (S) TO SR 241
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.4%
55 X 98.9%
54 X 97.7%
53 X 94.8%
52 X 92.0%
51 X 88.5% }PACE
50 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 76.4% }PACE
48 X 67.2% }PACE
47 X 56.3% }PACE
46 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 38.5% }PACE
44 X 29.9% }PACE
43 X 24.1% }PACE
HCI
43 X 24.1% }PACE
42 X 17.2% }PACE
41 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 7.5%
39 X 4.0%
38 X 1.7%
37 X 0.6%
36 X 0.6%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.5 %
A - 2
Alton 2024-03
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY SR 241 TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOWNE CTR
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.67
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
20,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA / TOWNE CTR (N) / SR 241
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / TOWNE CTR (N)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - YES / NO (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-04
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY SR 241 TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X X 3 1.3% 100.0%
55 X X X X 4 1.8% 98.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 96.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.3% 92.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.4% 80.9%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.0% 72.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.6% 64.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.1% 56.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.0% 49.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.1% 41.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.8% 34.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.3% 28.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.4% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 19.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.4% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 19.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.9% 15.1%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 6.7%
X X X X 4 1.8% 4.0%
X X X 3 1.3% 2.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.9%
35 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 225
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.6 %
File: Alton 2024-04
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY SR 241 TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 98.7%
54 X 96.9%
53 X 92.9% }PACE
52 X 87.6% }PACE
51 X 80.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 72.4% }PACE
49 X 64.4% }PACE
48 X 56.9% }PACE
47 X 49.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 41.8% }PACE
45 X 34.7% }PACE
44 X 28.9% }PACE
43 X 23.6%
HCI
44 X 28.9% }PACE
43 X 23.6%
42 X 19.1%
41 X 15.1%
40 X 10.2% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 6.7%
38 X 4.0%
37 X 2.2%
36 X 0.9%
35 X 0.4%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.6 %
Alton 2024-04
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO PALOMA-ROMANO
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SANTA RITA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.38
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.77
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1-2 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes Portola to Odessa) 2,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1-2 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes Portola to Odessa)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NOT RESTRICTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER NO STOPPING OVER 2 AXLE OR 22' LONG OR 7' HIGH
POSTED PLAY GROUND ADVISORY SIGN
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL DBL YELLOW & SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINES
PAINTED ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / ALTON PARK
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-05
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO PALOMA-ROMANO
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X X 2 1.7% 98.3%
X X X X 4 3.3% 96.7%
45 X X X 3 2.5% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 90.9%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 81.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 4.1% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 81.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 74.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 66.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 57.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 49.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 38.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 31.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 24.0%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 14.9%
X X X 3 2.5% 10.7%
X X X 3 2.5% 8.3%
X X X X 4 3.3% 5.8%
30 X X X 3 2.5% 2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
File: Alton 2024-05
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO PALOMA-ROMANO
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.2%
47 X 98.3%
46 X 96.7%
45 X 93.4%
44 X 90.9% }PACE
43 X 86.0% }PACE
HCI
44 X 90.9% }PACE
43 X 86.0% }PACE
42 X 81.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 74.4% }PACE
40 X 66.9% }PACE
39 X 57.9% }PACE
38 X 49.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.8% }PACE
36 X 31.4% }PACE
35 X 24.0% }PACE
34 X 14.9% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 10.7%
32 X 8.3%
31 X 5.8%
30 X 2.5%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
Alton 2024-05
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ASPAN STREET MUIRLANDS BL TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF LAMBERT
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.53
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 1.60
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
4,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO (except Delivery Trucks)
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of) / NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE (btwn Center to Lambert) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (at curve)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE ROADWAY
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Aspan 2024-06
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 3.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ASPAN STREET MUIRLANDS BL TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X X X 4 2.6% 96.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 94.2%
40 X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 92.3%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 87.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.7% 80.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 71.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.3% 67.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 71.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.3% 67.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 54.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.3% 41.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 31.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.7% 25.2%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 17.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 14.2%
X X X 3 1.9% 8.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 6.5%
25 X X X X 4 2.6% 4.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 155
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
File: Aspan 2024-06
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ASPAN STREET MUIRLANDS BL TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.7%
43 X 98.1%
42 X 96.8%
41 X 94.2%
40 X 92.3%
39 X 87.7%
38 X 84.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 84.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 80.6% }PACE
36 X 71.0% }PACE
35 X 67.1% }PACE
34 X 54.8% }PACE
33 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 41.9% }PACE
31 X 31.6% }PACE
30 X 25.2% }PACE
29 X 17.4% }PACE
28 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 8.4%
26 X 6.5%
25 X 4.5%
24 X 1.9%
23 X 1.3%
22 X 0.6%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
Aspan 2024-06
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE LANE TOLEDO LANE TO JERONIMO LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ONTARIO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH Advisory (at East end and West end)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS NONE
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES / YES
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake Ln 2024-07
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 4.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE LANE TOLEDO LANE TO JERONIMO LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 98.2%
X 1 0.9% 97.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 96.5%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 91.2%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 86.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 81.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 76.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 68.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 60.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 51.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 32.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 25.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 17.5%
20 X X X X X 5 4.4% 12.3%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 7.9%
X X X 3 2.6% 3.5%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.3 %
File: Bake Ln 2024-07
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE LANE TOLEDO LANE TO JERONIMO LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 98.2%
33 X 97.4%
32 X 96.5%
31 X 91.2%
30 X 86.8% }PACE
29 X 81.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 76.3% }PACE
27 X 68.4% }PACE
26 X 60.5% }PACE
25 X 51.8% }PACE
24 X 42.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 32.5% }PACE
22 X 25.4% }PACE
21 X 17.5% }PACE
20 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
19 X 7.9%
18 X 3.5%
17 X 0.9%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.3 %
Bake Ln 2024-07
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT (w/o JERONIMO) TO TOLEDO WAY DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 23 4.60 0.51
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
61,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES NO / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake pkwy 2024-08
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT (w/o JERONIMO) TO TOLEDO WAY DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
55 X X X 3 1.5% 98.5%
X X X X X 5 2.4% 97.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.3% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.9% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.8% 84.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.8% 77.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.8% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.3% 61.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.8% 51.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.8% 42.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.3% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.9% 27.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.3% 22.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.9% 15.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.4% 11.7%
40 X X X X 4 2.0% 7.3%
X X X X 4 2.0% 5.4%
X X X X 4 2.0% 3.4%
X 1 0.5% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
35 X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 205
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.0 %
File: Bake pkwy 2024-08
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT (w/o JERONIMO) TO TOLEDO WAY DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.5%
55 X 98.5%
54 X 97.1%
53 X 94.6% }PACE
52 X 88.3% }PACE
51 X 84.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 77.6% }PACE
49 X 69.8% }PACE
48 X 61.0% }PACE
47 X 51.7% }PACE
46 X 42.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 36.1% }PACE
44 X 27.8% }PACE
43 X 22.0%
42 X 15.6%
41 X 11.7% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 7.3%
39 X 5.4%
38 X 3.4%
HCI
38 X 3.4%
37 X 1.5%
36 X 1.0%
35 X 0.5%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.0 %
Bake pkwy 2024-08
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 53.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH (EB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 3 0.60 0.09
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 2 0.40 0.06
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.06
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 23 4.60 0.67
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
44,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / CALLE ENTRADA / TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / CALLE ENTRADA / TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F + NF = FRONTING + NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-09
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 3.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.43 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X 1 0.5% 99.1%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.6%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 97.2%
55 X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 94.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.8% 79.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.3% 70.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 9.8% 60.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.9% 51.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.8% 43.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.0% 34.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.0% 27.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.6% 20.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 14.9%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 11.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 8.4%
X X X X 4 1.9% 5.6%
40 X X X 3 1.4% 3.7%
X X 2 0.9% 2.3%
X X 2 0.9% 1.4%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 215
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
File: Bake 2024-09
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 99.1%
57 X 98.6%
56 X 97.2%
55 X 94.9%
54 X 91.2% }PACE
53 X 85.1% }PACE
52 X 79.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 70.2% }PACE
50 X 60.9% }PACE
49 X 51.2% }PACE
48 X 43.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 34.4% }PACE
46 X 27.4% }PACE
45 X 20.5% }PACE
44 X 14.9% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 11.2%
42 X 8.4%
41 X 5.6%
40 X 3.7%
39 X 2.3%
38 X 1.4%
HCI
38 X 1.4%
37 X 0.5%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
Bake 2024-09
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TRABUCO RD TO SOUTH POINT DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SOUTH POINTE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.30
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes btwn Artists to S.Pointe) 30,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes btwn Artists to S.Pointe)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO / ARTISTS / SOUTH POINTE
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / ARTISTS / SOUTH POINTE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE (at South Pointe)
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - YES / NO (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake 2024-10
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TRABUCO RD TO SOUTH POINT DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
55 X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 98.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 94.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.7% 90.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 84.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.8% 75.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.3% 67.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 11.3% 56.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.3% 45.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 27.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 20.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.2% 16.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 9.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 6.7%
X X X X 4 2.1% 3.6%
40 X X 2 1.0% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 194
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
File: Bake 2024-10
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TRABUCO RD TO SOUTH POINT DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.5%
55 X 98.5%
54 X 94.8%
53 X 90.7% }PACE
52 X 84.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 75.8% }PACE
50 X 67.0% }PACE
49 X 56.7% }PACE
48 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 36.1% }PACE
46 X 27.8% }PACE
45 X 20.6% }PACE
44 X 16.0% }PACE
43 X 9.8% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 6.7%
41 X 3.6%
40 X 1.5%
39 X 0.5%
38 X 0.0%
HCI
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
Bake 2024-10
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY SOUTH POINTE DR TO NORTH POINTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SOUTH POINTE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH (EB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLSIONS 7 1.40 0.33
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
29,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SOUTH POINTE / NORTH POINTE
CROSSWALKS AT SOUTH POINTE / NORTH POINTE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL (EB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / CHURCH
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake 2024-11
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and a church. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 54.2 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 46 to 55 mph, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY SOUTH POINTE DR TO NORTH POINTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.9% 99.5%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 97.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.7% 94.8%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.6% 90.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.5% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.6% 75.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.5% 69.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.5% 60.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.5% 52.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 43.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 37.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.2% 31.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.2% 26.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.2% 21.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.2% 16.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.8% 11.8%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 8.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 5.2%
40 X X X X 4 1.9% 3.8%
X X 2 0.9% 1.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 212
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
File: Bake 2024-11
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY SOUTH POINTE DR TO NORTH POINTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.5%
57 X 97.6%
56 X 94.8%
55 X 90.1% }PACE
54 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 75.9% }PACE
52 X 69.3% }PACE
51 X 60.8% }PACE
50 X 52.4% }PACE
49 X 43.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
48 X 37.7% }PACE
47 X 31.6% }PACE
46 X 26.4% }PACE
45 X 21.2%
44 X 16.0%
43 X 11.8% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 8.0%
41 X 5.2%
40 X 3.8%
39 X 1.9%
38 X 0.9%
HCI
38 X 0.9%
37 X 0.5%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
Bake 2024-11
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY NORTH POINTE DR TO COMMERCENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COMMERCENTRE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 48 - 57 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 13 2.60 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORTH POINTE / COMMERCENTRE
CROSSWALKS AT NORTH POINTE / COMMERCENTRE
27,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT NORTH POINTE / COMMERCENTRE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL GRADE (EB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake 2024-12
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 55.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY NORTH POINTE DR TO COMMERCENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.8% 99.5%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 97.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 94.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.3% 89.4%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.8% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.3% 67.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 60.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.4% 53.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.7% 46.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 38.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 31.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 25.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 20.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 15.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 11.0%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 7.8%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 4.6%
X X 2 0.9% 2.3%
40 X 1 0.5% 1.4%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 218
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
File: Bake 2024-12
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY NORTH POINTE DR TO COMMERCENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 97.7%
57 X 94.5% }PACE
56 X 89.4% }PACE
55 X 82.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 75.2% }PACE
53 X 67.4% }PACE
52 X 60.1% }PACE
51 X 53.2% }PACE
50 X 46.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
49 X 38.1% }PACE
48 X 31.2% }PACE
47 X 25.2%
46 X 20.2%
45 X 15.6%
44 X 11.0% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 7.8%
42 X 4.6%
41 X 2.3%
40 X 1.4%
39 X 0.9%
38 X 0.5%
HCI
38 X 0.5%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
Bake 2024-12
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY COMMERCENTRE DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BAFFIN BAY
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 48 - 57 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.11
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 18 3.60 0.64
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE / DIMENSION
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / DIMENSION
24,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-13
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. Field observations included bike lanes, no stopping any time, gradual to moderate horizontal-vertical roadway curves and areas of limited sight distance at roadway curves. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 48 to 57 mph. With areas of limited sight distance and to maintain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.64 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY COMMERCENTRE DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 99.4%
60 X X X X 4 2.3% 98.3%
X X X X 4 2.3% 96.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 93.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 90.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 85.6%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.5% 60.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 48.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 40.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 32.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 16.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 10.3%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 6.3%
45 X X X 3 1.7% 3.4%
X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
File: Bake 2024-13
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY COMMERCENTRE DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 99.4%
60 X 98.3%
59 X 96.0%
58 X 93.7%
57 X 90.2% }PACE
56 X 85.6% }PACE
55 X 79.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 71.3% }PACE
53 X 60.3% }PACE
52 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 40.2% }PACE
50 X 32.8% }PACE
49 X 23.6% }PACE
48 X 16.7% }PACE
47 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 6.3%
45 X 3.4%
44 X 1.7%
43 X 0.6%
HCI
43 X 0.6%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
Bake 2024-13
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LUPALA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 56.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 48 - 57 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.20
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 30 6.00 0.76
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSION / EMI WY-RANCH PKWY (S) / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE 25,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSION / EMI WY-RANCH PKWY (S) / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE
CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSION / EMI WY-RANCH PKWY (S) / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - YES / FEW (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-14
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and residential (non- fronting). Field observations include bike lanes, no stopping any time, and slight to gradual roadway curves. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 56.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.84 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.5%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
0 0.0% 99.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.0%
60 X X X 3 1.5% 97.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.1% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 87.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 80.5%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.2% 72.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.7% 63.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 54.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.2% 46.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 36.9%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 29.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 18.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 12.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 8.2%
45 X X X X X 5 2.6% 4.1%
X X 2 1.0% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 195
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 56.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.8 %
File: Bake 2024-14
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.5%
63 X 99.5%
62 X 99.0%
61 X 99.0%
60 X 97.9%
59 X 96.4%
58 X 92.8%
57 X 87.7% }PACE
56 X 80.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
55 X 72.3% }PACE
54 X 63.1% }PACE
53 X 54.4% }PACE
52 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 36.9% }PACE
50 X 29.7% }PACE
49 X 24.1% }PACE
48 X 18.5% }PACE
47 X 12.8% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 8.2%
45 X 4.1%
44 X 1.5%
43 X 0.5%
HCI
44 X 1.5%
43 X 0.5%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 56.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.8 %
Bake 2024-14
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PORTOLA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (WB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.43
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 1.58
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
15,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOWN CENTRE / PORTOLA
CROSSWALKS AT TOWN CENTRE / PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - YES / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-15
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.24 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.3% 99.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.1% 97.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 92.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 85.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 77.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 68.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 77.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 68.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 58.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 50.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 39.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 31.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 22.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 16.0%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 10.3%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 5.7%
X X 2 1.1% 2.3%
X X 2 1.1% 1.1%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 175
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
File: Bake 2024-15
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.4%
46 X 97.1%
45 X 92.0% }PACE
44 X 85.7% }PACE
43 X 77.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
44 X 85.7% }PACE
43 X 77.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 68.0% }PACE
41 X 58.9% }PACE
40 X 50.3% }PACE
39 X 39.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 31.4% }PACE
37 X 22.3% }PACE
36 X 16.0% }PACE
35 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 5.7%
33 X 2.3%
32 X 1.1%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
Bake 2024-15
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BURBANK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.19
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.19
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
11,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA / RUE DE FORTUNA
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / RUE DE FORTUNA (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT SLIGHT "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / LIBRARY / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-16
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and a library. Field notes include a constant slight “C” curve. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.1 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.26 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 98.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 96.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 91.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.8% 75.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 66.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.8% 75.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 66.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 56.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 48.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 40.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 33.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 25.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 20.1%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 12.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 8.0%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 4.6%
X X X 3 1.7% 1.7%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.6 %
File: Bake 2024-16
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 98.9%
46 X 96.0%
45 X 91.4% }PACE
44 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 75.9% }PACE
HCI
44 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 75.9% }PACE
42 X 66.1% }PACE
41 X 56.9% }PACE
40 X 48.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 40.2% }PACE
38 X 33.3% }PACE
37 X 25.9% }PACE
36 X 20.1% }PACE
35 X 12.6% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 8.0%
33 X 4.6%
32 X 1.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.6 %
Bake 2024-16
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY RUE DE FORTUNE TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.49
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.49
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
4,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RUE DE FORTUNA, STOP - LAKE FOREST CROSSWALKS AT RUE DE FORTUNA (sch) / LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEIDAN ISLAND & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-17
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.23 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY RUE DE FORTUNE TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.7%
X 1 0.7% 96.6%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.0%
45 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 94.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 85.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 79.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 85.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.4% 71.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 61.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.4% 53.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 44.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 36.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 28.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 21.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 15.4%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 10.7%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 7.4%
X X X X 4 2.7% 3.4%
30 X 1 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.7 %
File: Bake 2024-17
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY RUE DE FORTUNE TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 98.7%
47 X 96.6%
46 X 96.0%
45 X 94.0%
44 X 89.9%
43 X 85.9% }PACE
HCI
44 X 89.9%
43 X 85.9% }PACE
42 X 79.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 71.1% }PACE
40 X 61.7% }PACE
39 X 53.7% }PACE
38 X 44.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 36.2% }PACE
36 X 28.2% }PACE
35 X 21.5% }PACE
34 X 15.4% }PACE
33 X 10.7% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 7.4%
31 X 3.4%
30 X 0.7%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.7 %
Bake 2024-17
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BURBANK BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LAKE FOREST
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 36.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 85.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - BAKE / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE TO SWEEPING "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Burbank 2024-18
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 1.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.33 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BURBANK BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
40 X X X 3 2.5% 98.3%
X X X 3 2.5% 95.8%
X X X X 4 3.3% 93.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.7% 90.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 83.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 74.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 83.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 74.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.8% 65.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 54.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.7% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.5% 33.3%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.0% 25.8%
X X X X X X X 7 5.8% 15.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 10.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 5.0%
X X 2 1.7% 2.5%
25 X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 120
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.0 %
File: Burbank 2024-18
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BURBANK BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 99.2%
40 X 98.3%
39 X 95.8%
38 X 93.3%
HCI
38 X 93.3%
37 X 90.0% }PACE
36 X 83.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
35 X 74.2% }PACE
34 X 65.0% }PACE
33 X 54.2% }PACE
32 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 33.3% }PACE
30 X 25.8% }PACE
29 X 15.8% }PACE
28 X 10.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 5.0%
26 X 2.5%
25 X 0.8%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.0 %
Burbank 2024-18
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO BIRENDA
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BIRENDA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 86.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
35 MPH (Advisory at Curves)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.13
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 1.03
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
5,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (EB) - FEW / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Canada 2024-19
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.79 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO BIRENDA
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
45 X X X X X 5 4.4% 98.2%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 93.9%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 88.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.4% 82.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 71.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.2% 63.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.3% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 37.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.5% 28.9%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 18.4%
35 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 13.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 18.4%
35 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 13.2%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 7.9%
0 0.0% 3.5%
X X 2 1.8% 3.5%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
30 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
File: Canada 2024-19
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO BIRENDA
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.2%
44 X 93.9% }PACE
43 X 88.6% }PACE
42 X 82.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 71.1% }PACE
40 X 63.2% }PACE
39 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 37.7% }PACE
HCI
38 X 37.7% }PACE
37 X 28.9% }PACE
36 X 18.4% }PACE
35 X 13.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 7.9%
33 X 3.5%
32 X 3.5%
31 X 1.8%
30 X 0.9%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
Canada 2024-19
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD BIRENDA TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO CT
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH (WB)
35 MPH (Advisory at Curves)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.35
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.35
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
4,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSIONS
CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSIONS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of)
NO RV PARKING / NO OVERNIGHT VEHICLES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) - PARTIAL / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS (at Dimensions) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Canada 2024-20
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 40 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.33 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD BIRENDA TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
45 X X X X X 5 4.0% 98.4%
X X X 3 2.4% 94.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 92.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.2% 81.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.0% 74.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.2% 66.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.6% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.6% 45.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 36.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 29.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 36.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 29.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 14.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 8.0%
X 1 0.8% 2.4%
30 X 1 0.8% 1.6%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 125
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.0 %
File: Canada 2024-20
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD BIRENDA TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.4%
44 X 94.4%
43 X 92.0%
42 X 87.2% }PACE
41 X 81.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
40 X 74.4% }PACE
39 X 66.4% }PACE
38 X 55.2% }PACE
HCI
38 X 55.2% }PACE
37 X 45.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 36.0% }PACE
35 X 29.6% }PACE
34 X 20.8% }PACE
33 X 14.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.0%
31 X 2.4%
30 X 1.6%
29 X 0.8%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.0 %
Canada 2024-20
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CATALINA ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:05 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HERON
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON
CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
2,300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT SWEEPING "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Alton) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ROUNDABOUT AT DIMENSION-CATALINA
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BAKER RANCH COMM PARK / PROMENADE PARK (roundbout) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Catalina 2024-21
This segment of Catalina is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non-fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sweeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
0.55 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CATALINA ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:05 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 98.5%
X X X X 4 3.0% 96.2%
X X X X 4 3.0% 93.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 3.0% 96.2%
X X X X 4 3.0% 93.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 90.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 85.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 78.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.0% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.5% 67.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.0% 60.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 14.3% 51.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.0% 36.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.5% 27.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 20.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 15.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 9.0%
X X 2 1.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.5% 2.3%
0 0.0% 0.8%
0 0.0% 0.8%
25 X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 133
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
File: Catalina 2024-21
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CATALINA ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:05 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.5%
43 X 96.2%
HCI
43 X 96.2%
42 X 93.2%
41 X 90.2%
40 X 85.7% }PACE
39 X 78.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 73.7% }PACE
37 X 67.7% }PACE
36 X 60.2% }PACE
35 X 51.1% }PACE
34 X 36.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 27.8% }PACE
32 X 20.3% }PACE
31 X 15.8% }PACE
30 X 9.0% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 3.8%
28 X 2.3%
27 X 0.8%
26 X 0.8%
25 X 0.8%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
A - 2
Catalina 2024-21
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CENTRE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO ASPAN ST
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ROCKFIELD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD, STOP - ASPAN
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO RV PARKING
MANY AREAS OF RED CURB
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE ROADWAY / SHORT SEGMENT
DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL (RESTUARANTS)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Centre 2024-22
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is within 0.2 mph of the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.19 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CENTRE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO ASPAN ST
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 98.0%
40 X X X 3 2.0% 97.3%
X X 2 1.3% 95.3%
X X 2 1.3% 94.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 92.6%
X X X X 4 2.7% 88.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 85.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 2.7% 88.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 85.9%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 81.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 78.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 63.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 57.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 49.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 43.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.4% 34.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 23.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 18.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 10.1%
X X X X 4 2.7% 5.4%
X 1 0.7% 2.7%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
20 X 1 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.4 %
File: Centre 2024-22
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CENTRE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO ASPAN ST
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 98.0%
40 X 97.3%
39 X 95.3%
38 X 94.0%
HCI
38 X 94.0%
37 X 92.6%
36 X 88.6%
35 X 85.9%
34 X 81.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
33 X 78.5% }PACE
32 X 69.8% }PACE
31 X 63.1% }PACE
30 X 57.7% }PACE
29 X 49.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 43.6% }PACE
27 X 34.9% }PACE
26 X 23.5% }PACE
25 X 18.8% }PACE
24 X 10.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 5.4%
22 X 2.7%
21 X 2.0%
20 X 0.7%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.4 %
Centre 2024-22
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CHERRY AVENUE JERONIMO RD TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ASHBROOK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
25 MPH (Advisory)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.39
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.39
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 2.33
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO, STOP- 2ND / CEDARSPRING / CRESTBROOK
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / CEDARSPRING / CRESTBROOK
1,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / CEDARSPRING / CRESTBROOK
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ALISO CREEK PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY (EB)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE - SWEEPING "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
AREAS OF RED CURB
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / GREEN BELT / PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Cherry 2024-23
This segment of Cherry Avenue is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 37.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
0.94 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CHERRY AVENUE JERONIMO RD TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 98.2%
X X 2 1.8% 96.5%
40 X X X X 4 3.5% 94.7%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 86.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 79.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 73.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 67.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 73.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 67.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 59.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 51.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.5% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 31.6%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 23.7%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 18.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 13.2%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 7.9%
X X 2 1.8% 2.6%
25 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.2 %
File: Cherry 2024-23
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CHERRY AVENUE JERONIMO RD TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 98.2%
41 X 96.5%
40 X 94.7%
39 X 91.2%
38 X 86.8% }PACE
HCI
38 X 86.8% }PACE
37 X 79.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 73.7% }PACE
35 X 67.5% }PACE
34 X 59.6% }PACE
33 X 51.8% }PACE
32 X 42.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 31.6% }PACE
30 X 23.7% }PACE
29 X 18.4% }PACE
28 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
27 X 7.9%
26 X 2.6%
25 X 0.9%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.2 %
Cherry 2024-23
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 2:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LUCANIA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT -
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Roundabout) 1,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Roundabout)
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / OLYMPUS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE CITY HALL / COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Civic Center 2024-24
This segment of Civic Center Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are City Hall, commercial, industrial and some residential (non-fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 37.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 28 to 37 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 2:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 99.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 96.8%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 96.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 88.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 81.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 74.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.8% 69.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 64.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 61.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 55.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.1% 46.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 35.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 28.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 23.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 15.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 10.3%
25 X X X X X 5 4.0% 5.6%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 126
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
File: Civic Center 2024-24
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 2:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 99.2%
41 X 96.8%
40 X 96.0%
39 X 90.5%
38 X 88.1%
37 X 81.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 74.6% }PACE
35 X 69.0% }PACE
34 X 64.3% }PACE
33 X 61.9% }PACE
32 X 55.6% }PACE
31 X 46.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
30 X 35.7% }PACE
29 X 28.6% }PACE
28 X 23.0% }PACE
27 X 15.9%
26 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
25 X 5.6%
24 X 1.6%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
File:Civic Center 2024-24
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF ARTIC OCEAN
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
6,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / ALTON
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / ALTON
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
NO PARKING 12am-6am CLASS A VEHICLES TRACTOR-TRAILORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Commercentre 2024-25
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 96.9%
50 X X X 3 2.3% 96.1%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 93.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 89.9%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 83.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 78.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 72.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 63.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 45.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 35.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 11.6%
X X X X 4 3.1% 4.7%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.7 %
File: Commercentre 2024-25
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.2%
51 X 96.9%
50 X 96.1%
49 X 93.8%
48 X 89.9%
47 X 83.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 78.3% }PACE
45 X 72.1% }PACE
44 X 63.6% }PACE
43 X 55.0% }PACE
HCI
43 X 55.0% }PACE
42 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 35.7% }PACE
40 X 25.6% }PACE
39 X 17.1% }PACE
38 X 11.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
37 X 4.7%
36 X 1.6%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.7 %
File:Commercentre 2024-25
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CIVIC CENTER
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.23
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
7,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / SERRANO SUMMIT / CIVIC CENTER / DIMENSION
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / SERRANO SUMMIT / CIVIC CENTER / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "c" CURVES (at Civic Ctr)
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Commercentre 2024-26
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.64 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
50 X X 2 1.3% 98.7%
X X X X 4 2.5% 97.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 94.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 84.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 75.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 65.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 56.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 48.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 56.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 39.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.6% 33.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 25.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 20.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 15.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 10.8%
35 X X X X 4 2.5% 6.3%
X X X X 4 2.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 158
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.2 %
File: Commercentre 2024-26
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.4%
50 X 98.7%
49 X 97.5%
48 X 94.9%
47 X 90.5% }PACE
46 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 75.3% }PACE
44 X 65.8% }PACE
43 X 56.3% }PACE
HCI
44 X 65.8% }PACE
43 X 56.3% }PACE
42 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 39.9% }PACE
40 X 33.5% }PACE
39 X 25.9% }PACE
38 X 20.3% }PACE
37 X 15.2%
36 X 10.8% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 6.3%
34 X 3.8%
33 X 1.3%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.2 %
Commercentre 2024-26
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE MONARCH BL-CATALINA TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:15 AM - 1:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF BAKE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.63
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.27
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
4,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE /MONARCH-CATALINA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT DOWNHILL GRADE (SB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ROUND-ABOUT AT MONARCH-CATALINA
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Dimension 2024-27
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.18 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE MONARCH BL-CATALINA TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:15 AM - 1:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 98.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 98.4%
X X 2 1.6% 97.7%
40 X X X 3 2.3% 96.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 93.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 89.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 84.5%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 79.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.6% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.6% 63.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 51.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 39.5%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 30.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 20.2%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 15.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 11.6%
X X X 3 2.3% 5.4%
25 X X X X 4 3.1% 3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
File: Dimension 2024-27
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE MONARCH BL-CATALINA TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:15 AM - 1:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.2%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.2%
42 X 98.4%
41 X 97.7%
40 X 96.1%
39 X 93.8% }PACE
38 X 89.1% }PACE
37 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 79.1% }PACE
35 X 75.2% }PACE
34 X 63.6% }PACE
33 X 51.9% }PACE
32 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 39.5% }PACE
30 X 30.2% }PACE
29 X 20.2%
28 X 15.5%
27 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
26 X 5.4%
25 X 3.1%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
Dimension 2024-27
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ENTERPRISE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.72
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
9,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / COMMERCENTER-ENTERPRIZE / CANADA / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / COMMERCENTER-ENTERPRIZE / CANADA / LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (Heavy parking btwn Canada to Lake Forest)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
NO RV PARKING
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
BUS STOPS
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Dimension 2024-28
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.73 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
0 0.0% 98.6%
X 1 0.7% 98.6%
0 0.0% 97.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 97.9%
50 X X X X X 5 3.4% 95.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 90.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 84.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 76.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.6% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 60.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 44.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 44.5%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 37.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 34.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 26.7%
X X X X 4 2.7% 21.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 18.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 12.3%
35 X X X 3 2.1% 7.5%
X X X 3 2.1% 5.5%
X X 2 1.4% 3.4%
X X X 3 2.1% 2.1%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 146
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
File: Dimension 2024-28
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 98.6%
53 X 98.6%
52 X 97.9%
51 X 97.9%
50 X 95.9%
49 X 92.5%
48 X 90.4% }PACE
47 X 84.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 76.7% }PACE
45 X 71.9% }PACE
44 X 60.3% }PACE
43 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
44 X 60.3% }PACE
43 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 44.5% }PACE
41 X 37.7% }PACE
40 X 34.2% }PACE
39 X 26.7% }PACE
38 X 21.2%
37 X 18.5%
36 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 7.5%
34 X 5.5%
33 X 3.4%
32 X 2.1%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
Dimension 2024-28
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SWARTZ
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 61.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 16 3.20 0.80
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 51 10.20 2.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 4 LANES PER DIRECTION
50,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 4 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BRIDGER / ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS AT BRIDGER (faded) / ROCKFIELD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER NO SHOULDERS
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / MANY
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / SHOPPING CENTERS (dense) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-29
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.22 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.2% 99.6%
X X X 3 1.2% 98.4%
X X X X X 5 2.0% 97.2%
45 X X X X X X X 7 2.8% 95.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.2% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.4% 89.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 84.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 79.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.3% 73.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6.7% 66.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.3% 59.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 53.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.6% 47.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.6% 47.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6.7% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 35.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.6% 29.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.8% 23.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.8% 19.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.4% 14.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.6% 9.9%
X X X X X X 6 2.4% 6.3%
X X X X 4 1.6% 4.0%
X X X 3 1.2% 2.4%
25 X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 252
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.8 %
File: El Toro 2024-29
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.6%
47 X 98.4%
46 X 97.2%
45 X 95.2%
44 X 92.5%
43 X 89.3%
42 X 84.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 79.0% }PACE
40 X 73.0% }PACE
39 X 66.7% }PACE
38 X 59.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 59.9% }PACE
37 X 53.6% }PACE
36 X 47.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 42.1% }PACE
34 X 35.3% }PACE
33 X 29.4% }PACE
32 X 23.8%
31 X 19.0%
30 X 14.3% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 9.9%
28 X 6.3%
27 X 4.0%
26 X 2.4%
25 X 1.2%
24 X 0.4%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.8 %
El Toro 2024-29
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MUIRLANDS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 13 2.60 0.29
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.09
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 6 1.20 0.13
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 3 0.60 0.07
TOTAL COLLISIONS 90 18.00 1.98
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 4 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / ARBORWAX / RAYMOND / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / ARBORWAX / RAYMOND / MUIRLANDS 41,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / ARBORWAX / RAYMOND / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER NO SHOULDERS
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF-few) / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-30
The segment of El Toro Road is an eight-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, commercial and residential (non-fronting).
The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 47.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 13 speed-related collisions, four (4) involved a serious injury, six (6) involved a pedestrian and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.60 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.6%
X X X X X 5 2.2% 98.7%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 3.5% 96.5%
X X X X X X X 7 3.1% 93.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.8% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.6% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.6% 78.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.9% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.9% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.5% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.5% 48.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.7% 41.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.3% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.1% 30.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.8% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.4% 19.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.9% 14.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.9% 14.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 3.9% 11.0%
X X X X X X 6 2.6% 7.0%
X X X X X 5 2.2% 4.4%
X X 2 0.9% 2.2%
X X 2 0.9% 1.3%
30 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 228
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.1 %
File: El Toro 2024-30
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.6%
51 X 98.7%
50 X 96.5%
49 X 93.0%
48 X 89.9% }PACE
47 X 85.1% }PACE
46 X 78.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 71.9% }PACE
44 X 64.0% }PACE
43 X 56.1% }PACE
42 X 48.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 41.2% }PACE
40 X 35.5% }PACE
39 X 30.3% }PACE
38 X 24.1%
HCI
38 X 24.1%
37 X 19.3%
36 X 14.9% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 11.0%
34 X 7.0%
33 X 4.4%
32 X 2.2%
31 X 1.3%
30 X 0.4%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.1 %
El Toro 2024-30
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MUIRLANDS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 53.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 61.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 3 0.60 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 55 11.00 1.44
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / FIRE STATION / JERONIMO 40,300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / FIRE STATION / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS / JERONIMO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RES (NF) /BUSINESS / CHURCH-SCHOOL / FIRE STATION / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-31
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, church, fire station and residential (non- fronting). A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had seven (7) speed-related collisions and three (3) involved a bicyclist. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.3 mph and 10 mph pace range of 45 to 54 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.52 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
X 1 0.3% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.7%
X X 2 0.7% 99.7%
X 1 0.3% 99.0%
60 X X 2 0.7% 98.7%
X 1 0.3% 98.0%
X X X X 4 1.3% 97.6%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.7% 94.6%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.7% 91.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 88.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.1% 83.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 7.4% 76.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.4% 69.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.7% 63.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.1% 57.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.1% 50.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.4% 44.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.4% 38.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.4% 32.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 26.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.7% 22.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 17.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.7% 22.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 17.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.4% 13.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 10.1%
X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 7.1%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 4.7%
X X X X 4 1.3% 3.0%
X X X 3 1.0% 1.7%
35 X 1 0.3% 0.7%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 297
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-31
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 99.7%
62 X 99.7%
61 X 99.0%
60 X 98.7%
59 X 98.0%
58 X 97.6%
57 X 96.3%
56 X 94.6%
55 X 91.9%
54 X 88.2% }PACE
53 X 83.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
52 X 76.8% }PACE
51 X 69.4% }PACE
50 X 63.0% }PACE
49 X 57.2% }PACE
48 X 50.2% }PACE
47 X 44.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 38.7% }PACE
45 X 32.3% }PACE
44 X 26.9%
43 X 22.6%
HCI
44 X 26.9%
43 X 22.6%
42 X 17.8%
41 X 13.5% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.1%
39 X 7.1%
38 X 4.7%
37 X 3.0%
36 X 1.7%
35 X 0.7%
34 X 0.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.9 %
El Toro 2024-31
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PINO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 47 - 56 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.21
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.07
TOTAL COLLISIONS 30 6.00 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TOLEDO
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / TOLEDO
39,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / TOLEDO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-32
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 0.8% 100.0%
60 X X X X 4 1.5% 99.2%
X X X X 4 1.5% 97.7%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 96.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.4% 94.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.3% 90.8%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 8.4% 85.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.6% 77.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 8.0% 69.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.6% 61.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 8.4% 53.8% 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 8.0% 45.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.3% 37.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.3% 30.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.0% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.3% 17.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.8% 12.6%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 8.8%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.5%
X X X 3 1.1% 4.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.5%
X X X 3 1.1% 4.6%
X X X X 4 1.5% 3.4%
40 X X X 3 1.1% 1.9%
X 1 0.4% 0.8%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 262
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-32
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 99.2%
59 X 97.7%
58 X 96.2%
57 X 94.3%
56 X 90.8% }PACE
55 X 85.5% }PACE
54 X 77.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 69.5% }PACE
52 X 61.5% }PACE
51 X 53.8% }PACE
50 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
49 X 37.4% }PACE
48 X 30.2% }PACE
47 X 22.9% }PACE
46 X 17.9%
45 X 12.6% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 8.8%
43 X 6.5%
HCI
44 X 8.8%
43 X 6.5%
42 X 4.6%
41 X 3.4%
40 X 1.9%
39 X 0.8%
38 X 0.4%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.9 %
El Toro 2024-32
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TRABUCO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 63.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.34
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.03
TOTAL COLLISIONS 34 6.80 1.16
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANO / TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO / TRABUCO
38,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO / TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-33
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed-related collisions, three (3) involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.42 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X 1 0.3% 99.7%
X X 2 0.7% 99.3%
60 X X X 3 1.0% 98.7%
X X X 3 1.0% 97.7%
X X X X X X X 7 2.3% 96.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.6% 94.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.2% 90.8%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.6% 79.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 6.9% 74.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.2% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.6% 61.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 7.9% 54.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 46.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 7.5% 40.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 33.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.6% 27.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 21.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.3% 15.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3.9% 11.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 7.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3.9% 11.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 7.5%
X X X X X X 6 2.0% 4.6%
40 X X X X X 5 1.6% 2.6%
X X 2 0.7% 1.0%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 305
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.6 %
File: El Toro 2024-33
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 99.7%
61 X 99.3%
60 X 98.7%
59 X 97.7%
58 X 96.7%
57 X 94.4%
56 X 90.8%
55 X 85.6% }PACE
54 X 79.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 74.1% }PACE
52 X 67.2% }PACE
51 X 61.0% }PACE
50 X 54.4% }PACE
49 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
48 X 40.7% }PACE
47 X 33.1% }PACE
46 X 27.2% }PACE
45 X 21.6%
44 X 15.7%
43 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
44 X 15.7%
43 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 7.5%
41 X 4.6%
40 X 2.6%
39 X 1.0%
38 X 0.3%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.6 %
El Toro 2024-33
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TRABUCO RD TO ALISO PARK DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MONTCLIFF
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 27 5.40 1.29
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES (WB) - 3 LANES (EB)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO / ALISO PARK
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / ALISO PARK
31,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / ALISO PARK
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - NO / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / ALISO CREEK PED TRAIL (EB) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-34
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station.
The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TRABUCO RD TO ALISO PARK DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
60 X X 2 0.7% 99.3%
X X X X 4 1.4% 98.6%
X X X 3 1.1% 97.1%
X X X X X X X 7 2.5% 96.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.9% 93.5%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.0% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.7% 84.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.5% 78.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.2% 72.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 7.9% 65.2% 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.2% 57.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.2% 50.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.5% 43.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.5% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.8% 29.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.4% 22.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.6% 16.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 13.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 10.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 13.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 10.4%
X X X X X X X 7 2.5% 7.5%
40 X X X X X 5 1.8% 5.0%
X X X X X X 6 2.2% 3.2%
X X 2 0.7% 1.1%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 279
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
File: El Toro 2024-34
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TRABUCO RD TO ALISO PARK DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 99.6%
60 X 99.3%
59 X 98.6%
58 X 97.1%
57 X 96.1%
56 X 93.5%
55 X 89.6%
54 X 84.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 78.9% }PACE
52 X 72.4% }PACE
51 X 65.2% }PACE
50 X 57.3% }PACE
49 X 50.2% }PACE
48 X 43.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 35.5% }PACE
46 X 29.0% }PACE
45 X 22.2% }PACE
44 X 16.8%
43 X 13.3% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
44 X 16.8%
43 X 13.3% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 10.4%
41 X 7.5%
40 X 5.0%
39 X 3.2%
38 X 1.1%
37 X 0.4%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
El Toro 2024-34
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ALISO PARK DR TO NORTHCREST DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ALISO PARK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 58.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 49 - 58 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 57.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.13
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.45
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (EB) - 3 LANES (WB)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALISO PARK / NORTHCREST
CROSSWALKS AT ALISO PARK / NORTHCREST (sch)
26,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ALISO PARK / NORTHCREST (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - NO / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-35
This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land use is residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions and three (3) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.47 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ALISO PARK DR TO NORTHCREST DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.2% 99.7%
X X X X X X 6 1.8% 98.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 2.7% 96.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.4% 93.9%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.0% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.3% 86.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 4.9% 82.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.5% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 7.0% 72.0% 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.1% 64.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 6.7% 58.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.2% 52.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 6.7% 47.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.1% 40.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.2% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.6% 29.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.3% 24.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.6% 20.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.3% 15.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.4% 11.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.0% 7.9%
X X X X X X 6 1.8% 4.9%
X X X 3 0.9% 3.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 1.8% 4.9%
X X X 3 0.9% 3.0%
X X X 3 0.9% 2.1%
40 X X 2 0.6% 1.2%
X 1 0.3% 0.6%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 328
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 57.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.4 %
File: El Toro 2024-35
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ALISO PARK DR TO NORTHCREST DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.7%
63 X 98.5%
62 X 96.6%
61 X 93.9%
60 X 90.5%
59 X 86.6%
58 X 82.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
57 X 77.4% }PACE
56 X 72.0% }PACE
55 X 64.9% }PACE
54 X 58.8% }PACE
53 X 52.1% }PACE
52 X 47.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 40.2% }PACE
50 X 34.1% }PACE
49 X 29.0% }PACE
48 X 24.4%
47 X 20.1%
46 X 15.5%
45 X 11.3% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 7.9%
43 X 4.9%
HCI
44 X 7.9%
43 X 4.9%
42 X 3.0%
41 X 2.1%
40 X 1.2%
39 X 0.6%
38 X 0.3%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 57.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.4 %
El Toro 2024-35
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORTHCREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF DESTRY
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 58.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 50 - 59 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.02
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 22 4.40 0.49
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORTHCREST / NORMANDALE
CROSSWALKS AT NORTHCREST (sch) / NORMANDALE
25,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT NORTHCREST (sch) / NORMANDALE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - YES / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / COMMERCIAL ( at S.Margarita)
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (WB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS (at Northcrest) / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-36
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had eight (8) speed-related collisions and one (1) fatality collision, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.99 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORTHCREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.3% 99.7%
X X X X X X 6 2.0% 98.3%
X X X X X X X 7 2.3% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 94.0%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.0% 91.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.3% 87.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.3% 81.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 7.6% 75.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 7.9% 67.9% 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.6% 59.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 7.3% 53.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.0% 46.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.0% 40.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.3% 34.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.0% 28.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.0% 21.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.0% 16.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.6% 11.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.6% 8.3%
45 X X X X X X X 7 2.3% 5.6%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 3.3%
X X X 3 1.0% 1.7%
X X 2 0.7% 0.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 1.0% 1.7%
X X 2 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 302
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-36
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORTHCREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.7%
63 X 98.3%
62 X 96.4%
61 X 94.0%
60 X 91.1%
59 X 87.1% }PACE
58 X 81.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
57 X 75.5% }PACE
56 X 67.9% }PACE
55 X 59.9% }PACE
54 X 53.3% }PACE
53 X 46.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
52 X 40.1% }PACE
51 X 34.1% }PACE
50 X 28.8% }PACE
49 X 21.9%
48 X 16.9%
47 X 11.9% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 8.3%
45 X 5.6%
44 X 3.3%
43 X 1.7%
HCI
44 X 3.3%
43 X 1.7%
42 X 0.7%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.9 %
El Toro 2024-36
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF NORMANDALE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 59.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 50 - 59 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 58.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.12
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.40
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORMANDALE / SANTA MARGARITA
24,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORMANDALE / SANTA MARGARITA
CROSSWALKS AT NORMANDALE / SANTA MARGARITA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - NO / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (EB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-37
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 50 to 59 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed-related collisions and one (1) collision involved a pedestrian. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
X X 2 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 0.6% 99.4%
0 0.0% 98.9%
X X X 3 0.8% 98.9%
65 X X X X X 5 1.4% 98.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.2% 96.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 2.8% 94.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 2.8% 91.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3.4% 88.8%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.2% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.0% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 5.6% 76.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 5.6% 70.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 7.0% 65.1% 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 6.1% 58.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 5.9% 52.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 6.7% 46.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 5.9% 39.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 5.3% 33.5%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 5.3% 28.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 4.7% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.2% 18.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 3.9% 14.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.1% 10.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 2.5% 7.0%
X X X X X X X 7 2.0% 4.5%
X X X X X X 6 1.7% 2.5%
X X X 3 0.8% 0.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 1.7% 2.5%
X X X 3 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 358
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 58.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-37
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 99.4%
67 X 98.9%
66 X 98.9%
65 X 98.0%
64 X 96.6%
63 X 94.4%
62 X 91.6%
61 X 88.8%
60 X 85.5%
59 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
58 X 76.3% }PACE
57 X 70.7% }PACE
56 X 65.1% }PACE
55 X 58.1% }PACE
54 X 52.0% }PACE
53 X 46.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
52 X 39.4% }PACE
51 X 33.5% }PACE
50 X 28.2% }PACE
49 X 22.9%
48 X 18.2%
47 X 14.0% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 10.1%
45 X 7.0%
44 X 4.5%
43 X 2.5%
HCI
44 X 4.5%
43 X 2.5%
42 X 0.8%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 58.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.9 %
El Toro 2024-37
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA TO MARGUERITE PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF PHEASANT ROW
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 57.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 50 - 59 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 61.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.51
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (WB) - 2-3 LANES (EB - Lane drops at Pheasant Run)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SANTA MARGARITA / PHEASANT RUN / MARGUERITE
CROSSWALKS AT SANTA MARGARITA / PHEASANT ROW / MARGUERITE 10,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT SANTA MARGARITA / PHEASANT ROW / MARGUERITE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) - NO / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / 2 WAY LEFT
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (EB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CHURCH / ALISO CREEK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-38
This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 57.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.61 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA TO MARGUERITE PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
X X 2 0.8% 99.2%
X X 2 0.8% 98.5%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 97.7%
60 X X X X X X X X 8 3.0% 95.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.5% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.3% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.8% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.7% 76.2%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.8% 70.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.2% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.5% 56.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.8% 49.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6.4% 42.3%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.9% 35.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.2% 30.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.5% 26.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.2% 22.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.4% 18.1%
45 X X X X X X X 7 2.6% 14.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.0% 12.1%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 9.1%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 9.1%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.8%
X X X 3 1.1% 4.9%
40 X X X X 4 1.5% 3.8%
X X X 3 1.1% 2.3%
X X 2 0.8% 1.1%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 265
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 57.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 30.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-38
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA TO MARGUERITE PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.6%
63 X 99.2%
62 X 98.5%
61 X 97.7%
60 X 95.8%
59 X 92.8% }PACE
58 X 88.3% }PACE
57 X 83.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
56 X 76.2% }PACE
55 X 70.6% }PACE
54 X 63.8% }PACE
53 X 56.6% }PACE
52 X 49.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 42.3% }PACE
50 X 35.8% }PACE
49 X 30.9%
48 X 26.8%
47 X 22.3%
46 X 18.1%
45 X 14.7% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 12.1%
43 X 9.1%
HCI
44 X 12.1%
43 X 9.1%
42 X 6.8%
41 X 4.9%
40 X 3.8%
39 X 2.3%
38 X 1.1%
37 X 0.4%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 57.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 30.9 %
El Toro 2024-38
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CIELO ENTRADA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 63.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.07
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.13
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GLENN RANCH / VALLEY VISTA / RIDGELINE
CROSSWALKS AT GLENN RANCH / VALLEY VISTA / RIDGELINE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
9,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT GLENN RANCH / VALLEY VISTA / RIDGELINE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of) / BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (WB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / OPEN UNDEVELOPED LAND RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-39
This segment of El Toro Road is a two-lane rural roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), a bike trail and open land. Field notes state that the roadway has a slight to gradual horizontal and vertical curves, areas of no shoulders, no stopping any time and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.
0.87 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
X X X 3 1.2% 99.2%
60 X X X X 4 1.6% 98.0%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 96.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.1% 94.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.9% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.9% 87.1%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.5% 83.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.1% 77.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.5% 72.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.0% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.4% 60.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.0% 52.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.0% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.4% 38.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.3% 31.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.5% 25.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.1% 19.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.3% 14.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.5% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 6.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.5% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 6.6%
X X X X X 5 2.0% 4.3%
40 X X X 3 1.2% 2.3%
X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 256
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.5 %
File: El Toro 2024-39
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 99.6%
61 X 99.2%
60 X 98.0%
59 X 96.5%
58 X 94.1%
57 X 91.0%
56 X 87.1%
55 X 83.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 77.7% }PACE
53 X 72.7% }PACE
52 X 67.2% }PACE
51 X 60.2% }PACE
50 X 52.7% }PACE
49 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
48 X 38.7% }PACE
47 X 31.3% }PACE
46 X 25.0% }PACE
45 X 19.5%
44 X 14.5% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 10.2%
HCI
44 X 14.5% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 10.2%
42 X 6.6%
41 X 4.3%
40 X 2.3%
39 X 1.2%
38 X 0.4%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.5 %
El Toro 2024-39
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD PORTOLA PKWY TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COOK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 59.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 51 - 60 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH (EB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.07
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.07
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.40
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA / ELLIPSE / DEFINITION / SADDLEBACK RANCH
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / ELLIPSE / DEFINITION / SADDLEBACK RANCH 16,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / ELLIPSE / DEFINITION / SADDLEBACK RANCH
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
PAINTED BIKE LANES / BIKES MAY USE FULL LANE
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN / 2 WAY LEFT TURN / SOLID DBL YELLOW / PAINTED ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS /RES (NF) / PARK / WILDERNESS PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Glenn Ranch 2024-40
This segment of Glenn Ranch Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, park and open space. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.92 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD PORTOLA PKWY TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 100.0%
65 X X 2 1.0% 99.0%
X X 2 1.0% 98.1%
X X X 3 1.4% 97.1%
X X X X 4 1.9% 95.7%
X X X X X X 6 2.9% 93.8%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.2% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.7% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.2% 78.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.6% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.0% 64.3%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.5% 55.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.6% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.1% 37.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.2% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.7% 23.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.3% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.3% 12.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 8.6%
X X X 3 1.4% 5.2%
X X X X 4 1.9% 3.8%
45 X X 2 1.0% 1.9%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 210
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 60 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 54.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
File: Glenn Ranch 2024-40
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD PORTOLA PKWY TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 99.0%
64 X 98.1%
63 X 97.1%
62 X 95.7%
61 X 93.8%
60 X 91.0% }PACE
59 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
58 X 78.1% }PACE
57 X 71.9% }PACE
56 X 64.3% }PACE
55 X 55.2% }PACE
54 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
53 X 37.1% }PACE
52 X 30.0% }PACE
51 X 23.8% }PACE
50 X 17.1%
49 X 12.9% - - - - - -15PCT
48 X 8.6%
47 X 5.2%
46 X 3.8%
45 X 1.9%
44 X 1.0%
43 X 0.5%
HCI
44 X 1.0%
43 X 0.5%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 60 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 54.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
Glenn Ranch 2024-40
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SADDLEBACK RANCH
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.34
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
7,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SADDLEBACK RANCH / VIEJO RIDGE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT SADDLEBACK RANCH / VIEJO RIDGE / EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES (EB) - YES / NO (WB)
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
PAINTED BIKE LANES / HORSE TRAIL (north side)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PARTIAL ISLAND
DEER CROSSING NEXT MILE SIGN
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK (at Saddleback Ranch) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Glenn Ranch 2024-41
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.69 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.2%
X X X X 4 2.4% 97.6%
55 X X X X 4 2.4% 95.2%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 92.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.5% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.7% 75.6%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 64.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 57.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.9% 49.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 40.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 32.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 26.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 20.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 15.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 8.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 15.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 8.9%
X X X X 4 2.4% 4.8%
40 X X X 3 1.8% 2.4%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 168
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
File: Glenn Ranch 2024-41
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.4%
57 X 98.2%
56 X 97.6%
55 X 95.2%
54 X 92.9%
53 X 89.9%
52 X 85.1% }PACE
51 X 75.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 64.9% }PACE
49 X 57.1% }PACE
48 X 49.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 40.5% }PACE
46 X 32.7% }PACE
45 X 26.8% }PACE
44 X 20.2% }PACE
43 X 15.5% }PACE
HCI
44 X 20.2% }PACE
43 X 15.5% }PACE
42 X 8.9% - - - - - -15PCT
41 X 4.8%
40 X 2.4%
39 X 0.6%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
Glenn Ranch 2024-41
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GOWDY AVENUE CAVANAUGH RD TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15 PM - 4:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF DURYEA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
20 MPH (Advisory at bend)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (except by permit)
NO PARKING TUES STREET SWEEPING / NO STOPPING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE & BEND (at Golden Eagle-north end of segment) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (partial)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / CAVANAUGH PARK (length of segment) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING, F = FRONTING File: Gowdy 2024-42
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.51 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GOWDY AVENUE CAVANAUGH RD TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15 PM - 4:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.1%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
35 X X X 3 2.6% 98.3%
X X X 3 2.6% 95.7%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.9% 87.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.9% 80.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.1% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 44.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 32.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 25.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 19.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 11.2%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 6.0%
X 1 0.9% 1.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 116
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
File: Gowdy 2024-42
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GOWDY AVENUE CAVANAUGH RD TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15 PM - 4:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 99.1%
36 X 99.1%
35 X 98.3%
34 X 95.7%
33 X 93.1% }PACE
32 X 87.1% }PACE
31 X 80.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
30 X 67.2% }PACE
29 X 55.2% }PACE
28 X 44.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 32.8% }PACE
26 X 25.0% }PACE
25 X 19.0% }PACE
24 X 11.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 6.0%
22 X 1.7%
21 X 0.9%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
File:Gowdy 2024-42
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO LANE BAKE LANE TO CAYUGA LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF HURON
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 18 - 27 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH Advisory (at Bake Lane)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - JERONIMO LN ENT (N), YIELD - JERONIMO LN ENT (S)
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL / YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (at norh end)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at intersection approaches) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Jeronimo Ln 2024-43 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO LANE BAKE LANE TO CAYUGA LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
X X X X 4 3.8% 98.1%
X X 2 1.9% 94.3%
30 X X X 3 2.8% 92.5%
X X X X 4 3.8% 89.6%
X X X X 4 3.8% 85.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 74.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.4% 67.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.3% 56.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.4% 44.3%
X X X X X X X 7 6.6% 34.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 27.4%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.7% 19.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.7% 14.2%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 8.5%
X X X 3 2.8% 3.8%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 106
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 18 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
File: Jeronimo Ln 2024-43
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO LANE BAKE LANE TO CAYUGA LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 99.1%
32 X 98.1%
31 X 94.3%
30 X 92.5%
29 X 89.6%
28 X 85.8%
27 X 82.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
26 X 74.5% }PACE
25 X 67.0% }PACE
24 X 56.6% }PACE
23 X 44.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 34.0% }PACE
21 X 27.4% }PACE
20 X 19.8% }PACE
19 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
18 X 8.5% }PACE
17 X 3.8%
16 X 0.9%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 18 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
Jeronimo Ln 2024-43
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF JERONIMO LN
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
12,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / LAKE FOREST (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / N0
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Jeronimo 2024-44
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
55 X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 97.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 96.2%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 93.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 90.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4% 83.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4% 78.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.5% 72.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 65.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.2% 55.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.6% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.3% 37.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 25.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 18.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 14.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 9.1%
X X X 3 1.6% 5.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 4.3%
X 1 0.5% 2.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 2.7%
35 X X X X 4 2.2% 2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 186
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.0 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-44
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.5%
54 X 98.9%
53 X 97.8%
52 X 96.2%
51 X 93.0%
50 X 90.3% }PACE
49 X 83.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 78.0% }PACE
47 X 72.6% }PACE
46 X 65.1% }PACE
45 X 55.9% }PACE
44 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 37.1% }PACE
42 X 25.8% }PACE
41 X 18.8% }PACE
40 X 14.0% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 9.1%
38 X 5.9%
HCI
38 X 5.9%
37 X 4.3%
36 X 2.7%
35 X 2.2%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.0 %
Jeronimo 2024-44
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SHADOW FAX
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / *25 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.07
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.47
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / SCHOOL / RIDGE ROUTE CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / SCHOOL (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch) 13,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / SCHOOL (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF PASSENGER LOADING ZONES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SCHOOL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Jeronimo 2024-45 This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and an intermediate school.
Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.63 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 99.4%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 98.3%
50 X X X X 4 2.2% 95.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 90.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 87.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.7% 81.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 73.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.8% 65.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.5% 56.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 45.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.0% 37.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.4% 26.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 11.0%
X X X X 4 2.2% 6.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 4.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 2.8% 4.4%
35 X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 181
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.6 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-45
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.4%
51 X 98.3%
50 X 95.6%
49 X 93.4%
48 X 90.6%
47 X 87.3% }PACE
46 X 81.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 73.5% }PACE
44 X 65.2% }PACE
43 X 56.4% }PACE
42 X 45.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 37.6% }PACE
40 X 26.5% }PACE
39 X 17.1% }PACE
38 X 11.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 11.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
37 X 6.6%
36 X 4.4%
35 X 1.7%
34 X 0.6%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.6 %
Jeronimo 2024-45
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MILES
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.83
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
13,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Jeronimo 2024-46
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.1% 98.9%
50 X X 2 1.1% 96.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 95.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 88.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 81.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.1% 74.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.0% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 47.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.5% 39.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 31.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 23.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.8% 17.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 11.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 7.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 7.4%
35 X X X X X 5 2.6% 3.7%
X X 2 1.1% 1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 189
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-46
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 98.9%
50 X 96.8%
49 X 95.8%
48 X 93.1%
47 X 88.9% }PACE
46 X 81.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 74.1% }PACE
44 X 64.0% }PACE
43 X 55.0% }PACE
42 X 47.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 39.7% }PACE
40 X 31.2% }PACE
39 X 23.8% }PACE
38 X 17.5% }PACE
HCI
38 X 17.5% }PACE
37 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 7.4%
35 X 3.7%
34 X 1.1%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
Jeronimo 2024-46
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD EL TORO RD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LAURELWOOD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 45.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 5 1.00 0.26
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.10
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 1.05
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO / CHERRY / LOS ALISOS
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / CHERRY / LOS ALISOS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
21,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / CHERRY / LOS ALISOS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
2 HR PARKING
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / RAISED MEIDAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / PARK / DRIVING RANGE RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Jeronimo 2024-47
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, park and a driving range. Field notes state that the roadway has slight horizontal and vertical curves, bike lanes and no stopping any time. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had five (5) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD EL TORO RD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.6% 99.0%
50 X X X X 4 2.1% 97.4%
X X X X 4 2.1% 95.3%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 93.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 90.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 86.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.4% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.3% 70.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.3% 62.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 55.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 47.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.4% 39.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.3% 30.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 16.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 9.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 2.6% 9.9%
35 X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 7.3%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 3.7%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 191
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.9 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-47
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD EL TORO RD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.5%
51 X 99.0%
50 X 97.4%
49 X 95.3%
48 X 93.2%
47 X 90.6%
46 X 86.4% }PACE
45 X 79.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
44 X 70.2% }PACE
43 X 62.8% }PACE
42 X 55.5% }PACE
41 X 47.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 39.8% }PACE
39 X 30.4% }PACE
38 X 23.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 23.0% }PACE
37 X 16.8% }PACE
36 X 9.9% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 7.3%
34 X 3.7%
33 X 1.0%
32 X 0.5%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.9 %
Jeronimo 2024-47
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE CENTER DR - MERCURY RD LAKE FOREST DR TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MERCURY
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
15 MPH (Advisory at Bend)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTALCOLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.96
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER ENTER FROM LAKE FOREST DR ONLY / NO EXIT (NB)
NO STRIPING AFTER SLURRY SEAL
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE ROADWAY / SHORT SEGMENT
THIS SEGMENTS COMBINES LAKE CENTER DR & MERCURY RD AS ONE SURVEY
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Lake Center -Mercury 2024-48
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.19 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE CENTER DR - MERCURY RD LAKE FOREST DR TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
35 X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
35 X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
X X X 3 2.3% 94.7%
X X X 3 2.3% 92.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 90.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 84.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.9% 80.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 70.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.1% 64.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.7% 58.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.4% 45.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.4% 36.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 28.2%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 22.9%
X X X 3 2.3% 19.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 16.8%
20 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 12.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 6.9%
X X 2 1.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.5% 2.3%
0 0.0% 0.8%
15 X 1 0.8% 0.8%
TOTAL VEHICLES 131
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.1 %
File: Lake Center -Mercury 2024-48
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE CENTER DR - MERCURY RD LAKE FOREST DR TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 98.5%
35 X 97.7%
34 X 94.7%
33 X 92.4%
32 X 90.1% }PACE
31 X 84.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
30 X 80.2% }PACE
29 X 70.2% }PACE
28 X 64.9% }PACE
27 X 58.8% }PACE
26 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 36.6% }PACE
24 X 28.2% }PACE
23 X 22.9% }PACE
22 X 19.1%
21 X 16.8%
20 X 12.2% - - - - - -15PCT
19 X 6.9%
18 X 3.8%
17 X 2.3%
16 X 0.8%
15 X 0.8%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.1 %
Lake Center -Mercury 2024-48
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ROCKFIELD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 40.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATEDCOLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 27 5.40 1.36
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
54,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - INTERSTATE 5 / ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-49
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 0.5 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.20 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
45 X X X 3 1.8% 99.4%
X X X 3 1.8% 97.6%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 95.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.8% 88.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 80.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.4% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 65.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.2% 59.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.4% 49.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.4% 49.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 41.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 34.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 28.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 21.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 16.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 12.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 7.8%
X X X X 4 2.4% 4.2%
X X 2 1.2% 1.8%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 167
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-49
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.4%
44 X 97.6%
43 X 95.8%
42 X 92.8%
41 X 88.6% }PACE
40 X 80.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
39 X 74.3% }PACE
38 X 65.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 65.9% }PACE
37 X 59.9% }PACE
36 X 49.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 41.3% }PACE
34 X 34.7% }PACE
33 X 28.1% }PACE
32 X 21.6% }PACE
31 X 16.8%
30 X 12.0% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.8%
28 X 4.2%
27 X 1.8%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-49
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATEDCOLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.11
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.06
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.03
TOTAL COLLISIONS 38 7.60 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
36,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / ASPEN / TOWNE CTR / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / ASPEN / TOWNE CTR / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL (RETAIL) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-50
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
50 X X 2 1.2% 98.8%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 97.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 94.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.1% 89.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.3% 80.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.7% 69.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.5% 60.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.9% 51.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.3% 43.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 36.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.3% 29.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 22.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 15.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 11.5%
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 7.3%
35 X X X X 4 2.4% 3.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 7.3%
35 X X X X 4 2.4% 3.6%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 165
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-50
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.4%
50 X 98.8%
49 X 97.6%
48 X 94.5% }PACE
47 X 89.1% }PACE
46 X 80.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 69.7% }PACE
44 X 60.0% }PACE
43 X 51.5% }PACE
42 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 36.4% }PACE
40 X 29.7% }PACE
39 X 22.4% }PACE
38 X 15.8%
HCI
38 X 15.8%
37 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 7.3%
35 X 3.6%
34 X 1.2%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-50
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 47 - 56 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.49
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 33 6.60 1.60
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / JERONIMO / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
32,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / MOBILE HOME PARK (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-51
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and mobile home park (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.35 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X X X 4 2.0% 98.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.6% 92.3%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.1% 85.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.6% 78.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.1% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 65.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.7% 58.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 49.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 41.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 34.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 26.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 20.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 14.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 7.7%
X X 2 1.0% 4.6%
X X X 3 1.5% 3.6%
40 X X 2 1.0% 2.0%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 196
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.4 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-51
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 98.5%
57 X 96.4%
56 X 92.3% }PACE
55 X 85.7% }PACE
54 X 78.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 71.9% }PACE
52 X 65.8% }PACE
51 X 58.2% }PACE
50 X 49.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
49 X 41.8% }PACE
48 X 34.2% }PACE
47 X 26.0% }PACE
46 X 20.4%
45 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 10.2%
43 X 7.7%
42 X 4.6%
41 X 3.6%
40 X 2.0%
39 X 1.0%
38 X 0.5%
HCI
38 X 0.5%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.4 %
Lake Forest 2024-51
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 53.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.09
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 23 4.60 1.09
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO
33,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / LAKE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-52
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a club house. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.35 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X X X 4 2.1% 98.5%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 96.4%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 93.3%
55 X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 90.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 87.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.2% 82.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 77.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 70.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.8% 62.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 52.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 44.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 36.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.7% 28.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.2% 22.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.2% 16.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 10.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 7.7%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 5.2%
40 X X X 3 1.5% 2.6%
X X 2 1.0% 1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 194
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-52
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 98.5%
57 X 96.4%
56 X 93.3%
55 X 90.7%
54 X 87.1%
53 X 82.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
52 X 77.3% }PACE
51 X 70.1% }PACE
50 X 62.4% }PACE
49 X 52.6% }PACE
48 X 44.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 36.6% }PACE
46 X 28.9% }PACE
45 X 22.2% }PACE
44 X 16.0% }PACE
43 X 10.8% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 7.7%
41 X 5.2%
40 X 2.6%
39 X 1.0%
38 X 0.0%
HCI
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-52
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FERNLEAF
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.15
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.05
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.02
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 39 7.80 0.95
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANO / CHINOOK / TRABUCO CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO (sch) / CHINOOK / TRABUCO 30,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO (sch) / CHINOOK / TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-53
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial.
The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.74 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.6%
X X X X 4 1.9% 97.2%
55 X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 95.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 91.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.4% 79.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.9% 71.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.9% 62.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.3% 54.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.4% 44.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 36.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.4% 30.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.1% 22.0%
X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 16.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 13.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 9.8%
X X X X 4 1.9% 6.5%
40 X X X X X 5 2.3% 4.7%
X X X X 4 1.9% 2.3%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 214
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-53
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.5%
57 X 98.6%
56 X 97.2%
55 X 95.3%
54 X 91.6% }PACE
53 X 85.5% }PACE
52 X 79.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 71.0% }PACE
50 X 62.1% }PACE
49 X 54.2% }PACE
48 X 44.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 36.4% }PACE
46 X 30.4% }PACE
45 X 22.0% }PACE
44 X 16.8%
43 X 13.6% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 9.8%
41 X 6.5%
40 X 4.7%
39 X 2.3%
38 X 0.5%
HCI
38 X 0.5%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-53
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FERNLEAF
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 64.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.32
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.11
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 38 7.60 1.35
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO / NEWVALE-CAÑADA / PITTSFORD CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / NEWVALE-CAÑADA / PITTSFORD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
21,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / NEWVALE-CAÑADA / PITTSFORD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-54
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, commercial and a church. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had nine (9) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, three (3) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.71 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X X 2 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X X X X 4 1.6% 99.2%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 97.5%
55 X X X X X X X X 8 3.3% 94.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.1% 91.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.9% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.4% 82.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 8.2% 74.9%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.8% 66.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 8.2% 58.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.2% 50.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.2% 44.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.6% 38.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.9% 31.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.7% 26.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.9% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.1% 18.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.7% 14.0%
40 X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 10.3%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 7.4%
X X X X X 5 2.1% 4.5%
X X X 3 1.2% 2.5%
X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
35 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 243
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 64.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.7 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-54
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.2%
57 X 99.2%
56 X 97.5%
55 X 94.7%
54 X 91.4% }PACE
53 X 87.2% }PACE
52 X 82.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 74.9% }PACE
50 X 66.7% }PACE
49 X 58.8% }PACE
48 X 50.6% }PACE
47 X 44.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 38.3% }PACE
45 X 31.7% }PACE
44 X 26.7%
43 X 23.0%
42 X 18.1%
41 X 14.0% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.3%
39 X 7.4%
38 X 4.5%
HCI
38 X 4.5%
37 X 2.5%
36 X 1.2%
35 X 0.4%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 64.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.7 %
Lake Forest 2024-54
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PITTSFORD DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FOREST RIDGE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 62.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 18 3.60 0.78
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PITTSFORD / VINTAGE WOODS / DIMENSION
CROSSWALKS AT PITTSFORD / VINTAGE WOODS / DIMENSION
17,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT PITTSFORD / VINTAGE WOODS / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL (Gas Station) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-55
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets.