Agenda packet — Lake Forest City Council, December 3, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
40 X X X 3 2.5% 98.4%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 95.9%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.0% 79.5%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 70.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.0% 63.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.2% 54.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.5% 46.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 35.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.0% 29.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 20.5%
X X X X 4 3.3% 14.8%
X X X X 4 3.3% 11.5%
X X 2 1.6% 8.2%
25 X X X X X 5 4.1% 6.6%
0 0.0% 2.5%
X 1 0.8% 2.5%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
0 0.0% 0.8%
20 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 122
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: Paseo Tranquilo 2024-77

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PASEO TRANQUILO TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 98.4%
39 X 95.9%
38 X 91.8% }PACE
37 X 86.1% }PACE
36 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
35 X 70.5% }PACE
34 X 63.9% }PACE
33 X 54.9% }PACE
32 X 46.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 35.2% }PACE
30 X 29.5% }PACE
29 X 20.5% }PACE
28 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
27 X 11.5%
26 X 8.2%
25 X 6.6%
24 X 2.5%
23 X 2.5%
22 X 1.6%
21 X 0.8%
20 X 0.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
Paseo Tranquilo 2024-77File:

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PAULING PORTOLA PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:25 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF DESCARTES

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION - 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (Portola to Decartes) 900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION - 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (Portola to Decartes)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA, STOP - LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO RV PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE - SWEEPING "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (existing some driveways)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Pauling 2024-78
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.71 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PAULING PORTOLA PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:25 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 3.8% 96.2%
X X X X 4 3.0% 92.5%
X X X 3 2.3% 89.5%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.5% 82.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.3% 74.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.5% 66.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 14.3% 55.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.8% 41.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.8% 28.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 18.8%
X X X X 4 3.0% 13.5%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 10.5%
30 X X X 3 2.3% 6.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.8%
X 1 0.8% 1.5%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 133
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
File: Pauling 2024-78

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PAULING PORTOLA PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:25 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 99.2%
45 X 98.5%
44 X 97.7%
43 X 96.2%
HCI
43 X 96.2%
42 X 92.5%
41 X 89.5%
40 X 87.2% }PACE
39 X 82.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 74.4% }PACE
37 X 66.2% }PACE
36 X 55.6% }PACE
35 X 41.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 28.6% }PACE
33 X 18.8% }PACE
32 X 13.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
31 X 10.5% }PACE
30 X 6.0%
29 X 3.8%
28 X 1.5%
27 X 0.8%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
Pauling 2024-78

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PEACHWOOD TRABUCO RD TO TAMERISK
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PALMWOOD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
2,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO, STOP - TAMARISK

CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (EB-w/o Palmwood) / NO STOPPING & PARKING (WB)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
NO SHOULDERS (many areas of)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Peachwood 2024-79
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PEACHWOOD TRABUCO RD TO TAMERISK
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 98.5%
X 1 0.7% 97.8%

97.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 97.0%
0 0.0% 96.3%
0 0.0% 96.3%
X X 2 1.5% 96.3%
X 1 0.7% 94.8%
50 X X 2 1.5% 94.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.2% 92.6%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.9% 83.7%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 74.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.1% 70.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.1% 59.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 43.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 43.7%
X X X 3 2.2% 36.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.6% 34.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 24.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.2% 20.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.2% 14.8%
X X X 3 2.2% 9.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.4% 7.4%
0 0.0% 3.0%
X X 2 1.5% 3.0%
0 0.0% 1.5%
0 0.0% 1.5%
30 X 1 0.7% 1.5%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 135
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: Peachwood 2024-79

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PEACHWOOD TRABUCO RD TO TAMERISK
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.3%
58 X 98.5%
57 X 97.8%
56 X 97.0%
55 X 97.0%
54 X 96.3%
53 X 96.3%
52 X 96.3%
51 X 94.8%
50 X 94.1%
49 X 92.6%
48 X 87.4%
47 X 83.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 74.8% }PACE
45 X 70.4% }PACE
44 X 59.3% }PACE
43 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
43 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 43.7% }PACE
41 X 36.3% }PACE
40 X 34.1% }PACE
39 X 24.4% }PACE
38 X 20.0% }PACE
37 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.6%
35 X 7.4%
34 X 3.0%
33 X 3.0%
32 X 1.5%
31 X 1.5%
30 X 1.5%
29 X 0.7%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
Peachwood 2024-79

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PITTSFORD DRIVE NORTHCREST DR TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ELMCREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.20
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 1.77

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST, STOP - NORTHCREST CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / CHARFORD (sch) / NORTHCREST (sch) 3,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / CHARFORD (sch) / NORTHCREST (sch) PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES (heavy)

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME (n/o Elmcrest)
ARES OF RED CURB / NO PARKING MONDAYS 10am-2pm, 2nd & 4th

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S' CURES & SWEEPING "C" CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PITTSFORD PARK / ELEM SCHOOL (at Lake Forest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Pittsford 2024-80 This segment of Pittsford Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), parks and a elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph.

However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or park within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.82 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PITTSFORD DRIVE NORTHCREST DR TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.9% 95.5%
X X X 3 2.7% 94.6%
X X X X 4 3.6% 92.0%
40 X X X X 4 3.6% 88.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.4% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.8% 79.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 61.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.5% 54.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.7% 42.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.7% 31.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 20.5%
X X X X X 5 4.5% 13.4%
30 X X X X X 5 4.5% 8.9%
X X 2 1.8% 4.5%
X X 2 1.8% 2.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 112
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.5 %
File: Pittsford 2024-80

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PITTSFORD DRIVE NORTHCREST DR TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 97.3%
43 X 95.5%
HCI
43 X 95.5%
42 X 94.6%
41 X 92.0%
40 X 88.4%
39 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.5% }PACE
37 X 69.6% }PACE
36 X 61.6% }PACE
35 X 54.5% }PACE
34 X 42.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 31.3% }PACE
32 X 20.5% }PACE
31 X 13.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
30 X 8.9% }PACE
29 X 4.5%
28 X 2.7%
27 X 0.9%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.5 %
Pittsford 2024-80

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SR 241
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF RANCHO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.28

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SR241 / RANCHO / SADDLEBACK / EL TORO 35,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SR241 / RANCHO / SADDLEBACK / EL TORO

CROSSWALKS AT RANCHO / SADDLEBACK / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (SB) - PARTIAL / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / CHURCH / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SPORTS PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-81
This segment of Portola Parkway is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, church and residential (non- fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 51.0 mph and 10 mph pace range of 43 to 52 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments on Portola Parkway and Santa Margarita Parkway, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SR 241
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
55 X X X 3 1.8% 99.4%
X X X X 4 2.4% 97.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 95.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 85.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.3% 78.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.9% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 60.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 53.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.9% 46.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 40.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 33.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 28.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 23.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 28.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 23.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 17.8%
40 X X X X X X 6 3.6% 13.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 10.1%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 5.9%
X X X 3 1.8% 3.0%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 169
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.1 %
File: Portola 2024-81

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SR 241
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.4%
54 X 97.6%
53 X 95.3%
52 X 90.5% }PACE
51 X 85.2% }PACE
50 X 78.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 69.8% }PACE
48 X 60.9% }PACE
47 X 53.8% }PACE
46 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 40.2% }PACE
44 X 33.7% }PACE
43 X 28.4% }PACE
HCI
43 X 28.4% }PACE
42 X 23.1%
41 X 17.8%
40 X 13.6% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 10.1%
38 X 5.9%
37 X 3.0%
36 X 1.2%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.1 %
Portola 2024-81

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY SR 241 TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF GLENN RANCH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 0.54

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
32,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / TOWNE CTR-PAULING/ GLENN RANCH / SR241

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / TOWNE CTR-PAULING / GLENN RANCH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-82
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.64 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY SR 241 TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.1% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.1% 97.2%
X X X 3 2.1% 95.1%
50 X X X X X X 6 4.2% 93.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.2% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 78.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 69.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.7% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.7% 53.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 45.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0% 37.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 45.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0% 37.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.6% 30.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 24.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.6% 18.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.2% 12.7%
X X X X X 5 3.5% 8.5%
X X X 3 2.1% 4.9%
35 X X X X 4 2.8% 2.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 142
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.7 %
File: Portola 2024-82

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PORTOLA PARKWAY SR 241 TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 99.3%
52 X 97.2%
51 X 95.1%
50 X 93.0%
49 X 88.7%
48 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 78.2% }PACE
46 X 69.7% }PACE
45 X 61.3% }PACE
44 X 53.5% }PACE
43 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
43 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 37.3% }PACE
41 X 30.3% }PACE
40 X 24.6% }PACE
39 X 18.3% }PACE
38 X 12.7% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 8.5%
36 X 4.9%
35 X 2.8%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.7 %
Portola 2024-82

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LAKE FOREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.30
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.75

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Auto Ctr to Bake) 25,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Auto Ctr to Bake)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / AUTO CTR / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / AUTO CTR / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-83
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.29 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
0 0.0% 97.9%
X X 2 1.4% 97.9%
50 X X X X X 5 3.4% 96.6%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 89.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3% 75.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 67.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 57.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 49.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 42.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 49.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.6% 35.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 28.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 22.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 15.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 11.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 6.9%
35 X X X X 4 2.8% 2.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 145
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
File: Portola 2024-83

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 99.3%
52 X 97.9%
51 X 97.9%
50 X 96.6%
49 X 93.1%
48 X 89.7% }PACE
47 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 75.9% }PACE
45 X 67.6% }PACE
44 X 57.9% }PACE
43 X 49.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
43 X 49.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 42.1% }PACE
41 X 35.9% }PACE
40 X 28.3% }PACE
39 X 22.1% }PACE
38 X 15.9%
37 X 11.0% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 6.9%
35 X 2.8%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
Portola 2024-83

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO ALTON PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:25 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ALTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.13
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.06
TOTAL COLLISIONS 15 3.00 0.96

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Alton to Bake) 19,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes only NB Alton to Bake)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / MARKET PL / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / MARKET PL / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL-SHOPPING CTR / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) GREENBELT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-84
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO ALTON PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:25 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 99.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 96.9%
X X X 3 2.4% 93.7%
50 X X X 3 2.4% 91.3%
X X X 3 2.4% 89.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 86.6%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 80.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 74.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.2% 64.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 54.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 45.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 54.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 36.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 29.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 22.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 17.3%
X X X X 4 3.1% 11.8%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 8.7%
35 X X X X X 5 3.9% 4.7%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 127
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.8 %
File: Portola 2024-84

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO ALTON PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:25 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 99.2%
52 X 96.9%
51 X 93.7%
50 X 91.3%
49 X 89.0%
48 X 86.6%
47 X 84.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 80.3% }PACE
45 X 74.0% }PACE
44 X 64.6% }PACE
43 X 54.3% }PACE
HCI
44 X 64.6% }PACE
43 X 54.3% }PACE
42 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 36.2% }PACE
40 X 29.9% }PACE
39 X 22.0% }PACE
38 X 17.3% }PACE
37 X 11.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 8.7%
35 X 4.7%
34 X 0.8%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.8 %
Portola 2024-84

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY ALTON PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:50 AM - 9:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF VISTA GLEN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH SB

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.21
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.42

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes Alton to Vista Glen) 4,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes Alton to Vista Glen)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / PALOMA

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / PALOMA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST NORTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Portola 2024-85
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the northbound direction.

0.60 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY ALTON PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:50 AM - 9:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
0 0.0% 98.5%
0 0.0% 98.5%
55 0 0.0% 98.5%
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 97.7%
X X 2 1.5% 93.1%
X X X X 4 3.1% 91.5%
50 X X X X X X 6 4.6% 88.5%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 83.8%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 74.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.8% 66.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 55.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 46.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.7% 36.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 29.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.7% 36.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 29.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 22.3%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 16.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 10.8%
X X X X 4 3.1% 6.2%
X X 2 1.5% 3.1%
X 1 0.8% 1.5%
35 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 130
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.2 %
File: Portola 2024-85

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

PORTOLA PARKWAY ALTON PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:50 AM - 9:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.2%
58 X 99.2%
57 X 98.5%
56 X 98.5%
55 X 98.5%
54 X 98.5%
53 X 97.7%
52 X 93.1%
51 X 91.5%
50 X 88.5%
49 X 83.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 80.0% }PACE
47 X 74.6% }PACE
46 X 66.2% }PACE
45 X 55.4% }PACE
44 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 36.9% }PACE
HCI
43 X 36.9% }PACE
42 X 29.2% }PACE
41 X 22.3% }PACE
40 X 16.9% }PACE
39 X 10.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
38 X 6.2%
37 X 3.1%
36 X 1.5%
35 X 0.8%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.2 %
Portola 2024-85

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:40 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CORRIDOR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.10
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.10
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 1.05

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
14,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / CORRIOR / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / CORRIDOR / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / NO RV PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL-RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rancho 2024-86
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:40 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.5% 98.5%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 97.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 93.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 89.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.5% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.5% 74.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 64.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.5% 57.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 48.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.5% 41.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 34.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.0% 29.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.5% 17.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 13.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 9.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 9.0%
35 X X X X X 5 2.5% 5.0%
X X X 3 1.5% 2.5%
X X 2 1.0% 1.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 200
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.5 %
File: Rancho 2024-86

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:40 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.5%
51 X 98.5%
50 X 97.0%
49 X 93.0%
48 X 89.0% }PACE
47 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 74.0% }PACE
45 X 64.5% }PACE
44 X 57.0% }PACE
43 X 48.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 41.0% }PACE
41 X 34.5% }PACE
40 X 29.0% }PACE
39 X 23.0% }PACE
38 X 17.5%
HCI
38 X 17.5%
37 X 13.0% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.0%
35 X 5.0%
34 X 2.5%
33 X 1.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.5 %
Rancho 2024-86

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HERMANA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.19

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / SPORTS PARK / PORTOLA

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / SPORTS PARK / PORTOLA
14,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / SPORTS PARK / PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / SKATE PARK PARKING

NO STOPPING ANYTIME / NO RV PARKING / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RES (NF) / SPORTS PARK / COMMERCIAL / SKATE PARK / VOLLEYBALL CTR / SPORTS PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rancho 2024-87
This segment of Rancho Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, skate park, volleyball center, Sherriff’s Station and community park. Field notes state that there is heavy pedestrian traffic to the volleyball center and skate park, heavy on-street parking, areas of red curbs and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a community park, a skate park and volleyball center within a distance of 1,320 feet.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.58 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.6%
50 X X X X 4 1.9% 97.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 95.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 91.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.5% 87.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.3% 80.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.9% 72.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.4% 64.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.3% 56.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.4% 47.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 40.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.4% 33.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 25.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.6% 19.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 14.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 9.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 9.7%
35 X X X X X X 6 2.8% 6.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 3.2%
X X X 3 1.4% 1.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 216
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
File: Rancho 2024-87

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY LAKE FOREST DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.5%
51 X 98.6%
50 X 97.2%
49 X 95.4%
48 X 91.7%
47 X 87.0% }PACE
46 X 80.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 72.2% }PACE
44 X 64.4% }PACE
43 X 56.9% }PACE
42 X 47.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 40.3% }PACE
40 X 33.3% }PACE
39 X 25.9% }PACE
38 X 19.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 19.9% }PACE
37 X 14.4% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.7%
35 X 6.0%
34 X 3.2%
33 X 1.9%
32 X 0.5%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
Rancho 2024-87

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ORCHARD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
5,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

HEAVY RT TURN INTO ALLRED CORPORATE CTR DRIVEWAY (WB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMUNITY PARK (Rear-side) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rancho Pkwy S 2024-88
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 4.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.67 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.5%
X X 2 1.5% 98.5%
0 0.0% 97.1%
50 X 1 0.7% 97.1%
X 1 0.7% 96.4%
X X 2 1.5% 95.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 94.2%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 89.1%
45 X X X X X 5 3.6% 85.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 81.8%
X X X X 4 2.9% 76.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.8% 73.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 2.9% 76.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.8% 73.7%
X X X X 4 2.9% 65.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.7% 62.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.3% 50.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.5% 43.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.9% 33.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 22.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 17.5%
X X X X 4 2.9% 10.9%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 8.0%
X X 2 1.5% 4.4%
X X 2 1.5% 2.9%
30 X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 137
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
File: Rancho Pkwy S 2024-88

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.3%
53 X 98.5%
52 X 98.5%
51 X 97.1%
50 X 97.1%
49 X 96.4%
48 X 95.6%
47 X 94.2%
46 X 89.1%
45 X 85.4%
44 X 81.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 76.6% }PACE
HCI
43 X 76.6% }PACE
42 X 73.7% }PACE
41 X 65.0% }PACE
40 X 62.0% }PACE
39 X 50.4% }PACE
38 X 43.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 33.6% }PACE
36 X 22.6% }PACE
35 X 17.5% }PACE
34 X 10.9% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 8.0%
32 X 4.4%
31 X 2.9%
30 X 1.5%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
A - 2
Rancho Pkwy S 2024-88

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

REGENCY LANE LAKE FOREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF OSTERMAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK (SB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.25
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 1.00

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST, STOP - NORMANDALE

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO OVERNIGHT VEHICLES

SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK / BUSNIESS (at Lake Forest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Regency 2024-89
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.81 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

REGENCY LANE LAKE FOREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.6% 99.1%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 96.6%
X X X X 4 3.4% 92.3%
X X X X 4 3.4% 88.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 85.5%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 76.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.1% 70.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.3% 59.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.7% 49.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 41.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.7% 49.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 41.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 32.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 23.9%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 14.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.1% 8.5%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 3.4%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 117
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
File: Regency 2024-89

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

REGENCY LANE LAKE FOREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.1%
43 X 96.6%
42 X 92.3%
41 X 88.9%
40 X 85.5% }PACE
39 X 76.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 70.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 70.9% }PACE
37 X 59.8% }PACE
36 X 49.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 41.9% }PACE
34 X 32.5% }PACE
33 X 23.9% }PACE
32 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
31 X 8.5% }PACE
30 X 3.4%
29 X 0.9%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
Regency 2024-89

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SANTIAGO CYN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SANTIAGO CYN / SADDLEBACK RANCH CROSSWALKS AT SADDLEBACK RANCH (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES (SB) - NO (NB)

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UPHILL GRADE (NB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (SB) - YES / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED (SKIP LINE) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at Santiago approach)

NO OVERSIDE VEHICLES

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PORTOLA HILLS CLUB HOUSE POOL-PICKLE BALL COURTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Ridgeline 2024-90
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards

0.28 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X 2 1.3% 96.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 95.5%
40 X X X X X 5 3.2% 93.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 90.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 85.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 69.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 60.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 69.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 60.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 51.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 43.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 27.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 18.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 11.6%
X X X X 4 2.6% 5.8%
X X 2 1.3% 3.2%
X X 2 1.3% 1.9%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 155
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.8 %
File: Ridgeline 2024-90

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.4%
43 X 98.1%
42 X 96.8%
41 X 95.5%
40 X 93.5%
39 X 90.3%
38 X 85.8% }PACE
HCI
38 X 85.8% }PACE
37 X 77.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 69.0% }PACE
35 X 60.6% }PACE
34 X 51.6% }PACE
33 X 43.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 36.1% }PACE
31 X 27.1% }PACE
30 X 18.1% }PACE
29 X 11.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 5.8%
27 X 3.2%
26 X 1.9%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.8 %
Ridgeline 2024-90

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:45PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF RICHLAND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - EL TORO / SADDLEBACK RANCH
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / SADDLEBACK RANCH (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy-SB)
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (SB) - NO / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED (SKIP LINE) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at El Toro approach)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / FIRE STATION / WATER DISTRICT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Ridgeline 2024-91
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards

0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:45PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 98.6%
X X 2 1.4% 97.8%
45 X X X 3 2.2% 96.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 94.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 76.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.8% 66.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.6% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 47.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 38.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.6% 28.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 20.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.6% 28.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 20.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 13.7%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 7.9%
X X X X 4 2.9% 4.3%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
30 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 139
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
File: Ridgeline 2024-91

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGELINE ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:10 PM - 3:45PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.3%
48 X 99.3%
47 X 98.6%
46 X 97.8%
45 X 96.4%
44 X 94.2%
43 X 89.9% }PACE
42 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 76.3% }PACE
40 X 66.9% }PACE
39 X 56.1% }PACE
38 X 47.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 47.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.1% }PACE
36 X 28.8% }PACE
35 X 20.1% }PACE
34 X 13.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
33 X 7.9%
32 X 4.3%
31 X 1.4%
30 X 0.7%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
Ridgeline 2024-91

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ELROND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.15
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.15
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 1.07

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS, STOP - ELROND CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS (sch) / ELROND (sch) 7,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS (sch) / ELROND (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL

OTHER NO STOPPING & PARKING ANYTIME

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) - YES / NO (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK /BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Ridge Route 2024-92
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 42.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
50 X 1 0.6% 99.4%
0 0.0% 98.8%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X 1 0.6% 98.2%
X X X X 4 2.4% 97.6%
45 X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 95.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.4% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 78.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.8% 72.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.6% 65.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.6% 55.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.6% 45.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.2% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 28.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 22.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 28.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.2% 16.3%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 9.0%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 6.0%
X X 2 1.2% 3.0%
30 X X 2 1.2% 1.8%
0 0.0% 0.6%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 166
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-92

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.4%
50 X 99.4%
49 X 98.8%
48 X 98.8%
47 X 98.2%
46 X 97.6%
45 X 95.2%
44 X 91.0%
43 X 85.5% }PACE
42 X 78.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 72.9% }PACE
40 X 65.1% }PACE
39 X 55.4% }PACE
38 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 45.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 36.1% }PACE
36 X 28.9% }PACE
35 X 22.9% }PACE
34 X 16.3% }PACE
33 X 9.0% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 6.0%
31 X 3.0%
30 X 1.8%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.6%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
Ridge Route 2024-92

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:10 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF RIDGE LANE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.16
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.16
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 1.45

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (1 LANE THRU TUNNEL) TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / JERONIMO, STOP - OVERLAKE / at TUNNEL CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS (sch) / OVERLAKE / JERONIMO (sch) 6,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS (sch) / OVERLAKE / JERONIMO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of) / NO PARKING MON-FRI 7am-5pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - PARTIAL / FEW (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / TENNIS CLUB RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Ridge Route 2024-93
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), club house, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.55 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:10 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 98.7%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 94.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 84.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 78.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 70.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.8% 63.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.7% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.1% 38.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 29.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 23.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 29.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 23.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 16.9%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 11.7%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 8.4%
X 1 0.6% 5.2%
30 X X X 3 1.9% 4.5%
X 1 0.6% 2.6%
X X 2 1.3% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 154
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-93

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:10 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 98.7%
45 X 94.8%
44 X 89.6% }PACE
43 X 84.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 78.6% }PACE
41 X 70.1% }PACE
40 X 63.0% }PACE
39 X 55.2% }PACE
38 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.3% }PACE
36 X 29.2% }PACE
35 X 23.4% }PACE
34 X 16.9%
33 X 11.7% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.4%
31 X 5.2%
30 X 4.5%
29 X 2.6%
28 X 1.9%
27 X 0.6%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
Ridge Route 2024-93

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:55 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF COSTA BELLA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TOLEDO
6,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TOLEDO
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO (sch) / TOLEDO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (WB) - YES / NO (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED ISLAND / DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Ridge Route 2024-94 This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.6 mph and 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 35 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:55 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
50 0 0.0% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.7%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.7%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 94.7%
45 X X X X X X 6 3.9% 91.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.6% 87.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.2% 80.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 64.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 55.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 47.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2% 38.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 29.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 21.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 15.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 21.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 15.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 9.2%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 5.3%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 152
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.2 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-94

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:55 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.3%
49 X 99.3%
48 X 98.7%
47 X 96.7%
46 X 94.7%
45 X 91.4%
44 X 87.5% }PACE
43 X 80.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 73.7% }PACE
41 X 64.5% }PACE
40 X 55.9% }PACE
39 X 47.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 38.8% }PACE
HCI
38 X 38.8% }PACE
37 X 29.6% }PACE
36 X 21.1% }PACE
35 X 15.1% }PACE
34 X 9.2% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 5.3%
32 X 2.0%
31 X 0.7%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.2 %
Ridge Route 2024-94

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANI / TRABUCO
5,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANI / TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO (sch) / SERRANO (sch) / TRABUCO (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

PAINTED BIKE LANES / UNMARKED BUS STOP

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & PAINTED ISLAND & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / HIGH SCHOOL / ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDS & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Ridge Route 2024-95 This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting), an elementary school and high school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 42.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 98.6%
X X 2 1.4% 97.2%
X 1 0.7% 95.7%
X X X 3 2.1% 95.0%
45 X X X X 4 2.8% 92.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 90.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 87.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.8% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.8% 75.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.2% 67.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.2% 58.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.9% 48.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 39.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 33.3%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 24.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5% 33.3%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 24.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.1% 19.1%
X X X X X 5 3.5% 12.1%
X X X 3 2.1% 8.5%
X X X X 4 2.8% 6.4%
30 X X X 3 2.1% 3.5%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 141
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
File: Ridge Route 2024-95

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.6%
48 X 97.2%
47 X 95.7%
46 X 95.0%
45 X 92.9%
44 X 90.1%
43 X 87.9% }PACE
42 X 83.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 75.2% }PACE
40 X 67.4% }PACE
39 X 58.2% }PACE
38 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 39.0% }PACE
36 X 33.3% }PACE
35 X 24.8% }PACE
34 X 19.1% }PACE
33 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.5%
31 X 6.4%
30 X 3.5%
29 X 1.4%
28 X 0.7%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
Ridge Route 2024-95

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIMHURST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO RIMGATE DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF TRABUCO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - TRABUCO / RIMGATE

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING 2nd & 4th THURS 10am-2pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - YES / YES (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE (Skip Line)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK (at Rimgate) / PED TRAIL (NB) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rimhurst 2024-96 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.52 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIMHURST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO RIMGATE DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.6% 99.1%
X X 2 1.7% 96.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 94.8%
X X X X 4 3.5% 89.6%
30 X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 72.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 63.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.2% 54.8%
25 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 42.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 33.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 24.3%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 16.5%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 10.4%
20 X X 2 1.7% 6.1%
X X X 3 2.6% 4.3%
X X 2 1.7% 1.7%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.1 %
File: Rimhurst 2024-96

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RIMHURST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO RIMGATE DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 96.5%
32 X 94.8%
31 X 89.6%
30 X 86.1% }PACE
29 X 80.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 72.2% }PACE
27 X 63.5% }PACE
26 X 54.8% }PACE
25 X 42.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
24 X 33.9% }PACE
23 X 24.3% }PACE
22 X 16.5% }PACE
21 X 10.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 6.1%
19 X 4.3%
18 X 1.7%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.1 %
Rimhurst 2024-96

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF CENTER

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CENTER / LAKE FOREST
15,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CENTER / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT CENTER / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

SHORT DISTANCE BTWN INTERSECTIONS

TRAFFIC BACKS UP AT INTERSECTIONS - SURVEYED ON GREEN LIGHTS ONLY ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (Dense) / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Rockfield 2024-97
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are dense commercial and business. Field notes include short distances between intersection, no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 43.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.25 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
50 0 0.0% 98.4%
X X 2 1.6% 98.4%
X 1 0.8% 96.8%
X X 2 1.6% 96.0%
X X 2 1.6% 94.4%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 92.7%
X X X 3 2.4% 86.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.1% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 75.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 69.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12.9% 62.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.1% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.5% 37.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.7% 27.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.3% 17.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.3% 17.7%
35 X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 10.5%
0 0.0% 4.8%
X X X 3 2.4% 4.8%
X 1 0.8% 2.4%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
30 0 0.0% 0.8%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 124
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.5 %
File: Rockfield 2024-97

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.2%
50 X 98.4%
49 X 98.4%
48 X 96.8%
47 X 96.0%
46 X 94.4%
45 X 92.7% }PACE
44 X 86.3% }PACE
43 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 75.8% }PACE
41 X 69.4% }PACE
40 X 62.9% }PACE
39 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 37.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 37.9% }PACE
37 X 27.4% }PACE
36 X 17.7% }PACE
35 X 10.5% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 4.8%
33 X 4.8%
32 X 2.4%
31 X 1.6%
30 X 0.8%
29 X 0.8%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.5 %
Rockfield 2024-97

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MERCY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 45.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (SB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.13
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 14 2.80 0.89

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
20,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE GRADUL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
WIDE ROAD (Lake Forest to Mercury-SB)

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rockfield 2024-98
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial. Field notes include no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph and 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 40 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.43 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.1%
X X X 3 1.9% 97.5%
X X X 3 1.9% 95.7%
50 X X X X 4 2.5% 93.8%
0 0.0% 91.4%
X X 2 1.2% 91.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 90.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.7% 85.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.4% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 74.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 69.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.2% 62.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.6% 56.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 47.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 38.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.0% 29.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 21.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 14.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 14.2%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 8.6%
X X X 3 1.9% 3.7%
X X 2 1.2% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 162
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.6 %
File: Rockfield 2024-98

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:05 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.1%
52 X 97.5%
51 X 95.7%
50 X 93.8%
49 X 91.4%
48 X 91.4%
47 X 90.1%
46 X 85.8%
45 X 82.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
44 X 74.7% }PACE
43 X 69.1% }PACE
42 X 62.3% }PACE
41 X 56.2% }PACE
40 X 47.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 38.3% }PACE
38 X 29.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 29.0% }PACE
37 X 21.0% }PACE
36 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.6%
34 X 3.7%
33 X 1.9%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.6 %
Rockfield 2024-98

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO CAVANAUGH RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF RIDGE ROUTE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (SB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.49

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / DUNE MEAR (sch)
15,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / DUNE MEAR (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Ridge Route) / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rockfield 2024-99
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO CAVANAUGH RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.0%
50 X X X X 4 2.7% 96.0%
X X 2 1.3% 93.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 92.0%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 88.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 84.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.0% 79.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.3% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 52.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.7% 46.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.0% 35.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 27.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 20.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 13.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 8.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 8.7%
35 X X X X 4 2.7% 4.0%
0 0.0% 1.3%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 150
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
File: Rockfield 2024-99

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO CAVANAUGH RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.3%
51 X 98.0%
50 X 96.0%
49 X 93.3%
48 X 92.0%
47 X 88.0%
46 X 84.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 79.3% }PACE
44 X 71.3% }PACE
43 X 64.0% }PACE
42 X 52.7% }PACE
41 X 46.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 35.3% }PACE
39 X 27.3% }PACE
38 X 20.7% }PACE
HCI
38 X 20.7% }PACE
37 X 13.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
36 X 8.7%
35 X 4.0%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 1.3%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
Rockfield 2024-99

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD CAVANAUGH RD TO SILVERBAY DR
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO & NORTH OF SILVERBAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 40.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.08
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.16
TOTAL COLLISIONS 15 3.00 1.23

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
17,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HARVEST / EL TORO / ORCHARD

CROSSWALKS AT HARVEST / EL TORO / ORCHARD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

VEHICLES BACK UP AT EL TORO & ORCHARD SIGNALS / BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (Many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / RAISED MEDIAN ISLANDE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL - RETAIL STORES (Dense) / RESTUARANTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Rockfield 2024-100
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 0.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD CAVANAUGH RD TO SILVERBAY DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
45 X X X X 4 2.2% 97.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 95.5%
X X X X 4 2.2% 92.2%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 89.9%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 86.0%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 82.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 78.2%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.3% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 62.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 62.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.1% 56.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.3% 46.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 39.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.5% 33.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 24.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 17.3%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 10.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 7.3%
X X X 3 1.7% 2.2%
0 0.0% 0.6%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 30.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.6 %
File: Rockfield 2024-100

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD CAVANAUGH RD TO SILVERBAY DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.4%
46 X 98.9%
45 X 97.8%
44 X 95.5%
43 X 92.2%
42 X 89.9%
41 X 86.0%
40 X 82.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
39 X 78.2% }PACE
38 X 73.7% }PACE
HCI
38 X 73.7% }PACE
37 X 69.8% }PACE
36 X 62.6% }PACE
35 X 56.4% }PACE
34 X 46.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 39.1% }PACE
32 X 33.5% }PACE
31 X 24.0% }PACE
30 X 17.3% }PACE
29 X 10.6% - - - - - -15PCT
28 X 7.3%
27 X 2.2%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 30.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.6 %
Rockfield 2024-100

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD SILVERBAY DR TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LANDVIEW

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 5 1.00 0.45
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.09
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.18
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 19 3.80 1.73

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
14,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LANDVIEW / LOS ALISOS
CROSSWALKS AT LANDVIEW (sch) / LOS ALISOS (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

NARROW PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rockfield 2024-101
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 3.5 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.41 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD SILVERBAY DR TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.3%
50 X X X X 4 2.8% 99.3%
X X 2 1.4% 96.6%
X X 2 1.4% 95.2%
X X 2 1.4% 93.8%
X X X 3 2.1% 92.4%
45 X X X X X 5 3.4% 90.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 86.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 77.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 67.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3% 60.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 52.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 43.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 34.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 24.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 24.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 13.8%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 7.6%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 4.1%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 145
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.6 %
File: Rockfield 2024-101

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD SILVERBAY DR TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.3%
50 X 99.3%
49 X 96.6%
48 X 95.2%
47 X 93.8%
46 X 92.4%
45 X 90.3%
44 X 86.9% }PACE
43 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 77.2% }PACE
41 X 67.6% }PACE
40 X 60.7% }PACE
39 X 52.4% }PACE
38 X 43.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 43.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 34.5% }PACE
36 X 24.1% }PACE
35 X 13.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 7.6%
33 X 4.1%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.6 %
Rockfield 2024-101

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE FORTUNA BAKE PKWY TO RUE DE VALORE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MONTAUBAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Bake to Fascia) - 1 LANE (Fascia to Rue De Valore) 1,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Bake to Fascia) - 1 LANE (Fascia to Rue De Valore)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE (sch) / FASCIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / LIBRARY (at Bake)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Rue De Fortuna 2024-102 The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.74 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE FORTUNA BAKE PKWY TO RUE DE VALORE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X X 2 1.6% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.1% 96.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 93.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 89.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 79.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 70.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 64.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 58.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 64.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 58.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 48.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 40.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 33.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 26.0%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 18.9%
X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 14.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 8.7%
X X X 3 2.4% 5.5%
X X X 3 2.4% 3.1%
25 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 127
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
File: Rue De Fortuna 2024-102

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE FORTUNA BAKE PKWY TO RUE DE VALORE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 98.4%
42 X 96.9%
41 X 93.7%
40 X 89.0%
39 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.5% }PACE
HCI
38 X 79.5% }PACE
37 X 70.9% }PACE
36 X 64.6% }PACE
35 X 58.3% }PACE
34 X 48.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 40.2% }PACE
32 X 33.9% }PACE
31 X 26.0% }PACE
30 X 18.9% }PACE
29 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 8.7%
27 X 5.5%
26 X 3.1%
25 X 0.8%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.7 %
Rue De Fortuna 2024-102

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE VALORE LAKE FOREST DR TO RUE DE FORTUNA
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MONTAUBAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Lake Forest to Argento) - 1 LANE (Argento to Rue De Fortuna) 4,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Lake Forest to Argento) - 1 LANE (Argento to Rue De Fortuna)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CHURCH (at Lake Forest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Rue De Valore 2024-103
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.73 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE VALORE LAKE FOREST DR TO RUE DE FORTUNA
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.3% 97.5%
40 X X X X 4 3.3% 94.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.9% 91.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.9% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 81.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 73.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 67.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 73.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 59.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.8% 49.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 39.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 32.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 26.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 18.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.9% 13.1%
X X X X 4 3.3% 8.2%
X X X X 4 3.3% 4.9%
25 X X 2 1.6% 1.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 122
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.1 %
File: Rue De Valore 2024-103

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

RUE DE VALORE LAKE FOREST DR TO RUE DE FORTUNA
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 98.4%
41 X 97.5%
40 X 94.3%
39 X 91.0%
38 X 86.1% }PACE
HCI
38 X 86.1% }PACE
37 X 81.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 73.8% }PACE
35 X 67.2% }PACE
34 X 59.8% }PACE
33 X 49.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 39.3% }PACE
31 X 32.8% }PACE
30 X 26.2% }PACE
29 X 18.9% }PACE
28 X 13.1% - - - - - -15PCT
27 X 8.2%
26 X 4.9%
25 X 1.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.1 %
Rue De Valore 2024-103

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO MILLWOOD RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SADDLEBACK RANCH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (NB)
15 MPH (Advisory at Curves)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GLENN RANCH
13,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GLENN RANCH

CROSSWALKS AT GLEN RANCH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL GRADES (NB)

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Glen Ranch approach)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCED
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-104
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) with a school nearby. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 37 to 46 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.20 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO MILLWOOD RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 98.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 93.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.9% 88.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 79.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.8% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 58.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.8% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 58.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 49.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.9% 39.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 30.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 22.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 10.8%
35 X X X X X 5 3.2% 5.7%
X X X 3 1.9% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 158
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-104

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO MILLWOOD RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 98.1%
46 X 93.7% }PACE
45 X 88.6% }PACE
44 X 79.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 69.6% }PACE
HCI
43 X 69.6% }PACE
42 X 58.9% }PACE
41 X 49.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 39.2% }PACE
39 X 30.4% }PACE
38 X 22.2% }PACE
37 X 17.1% }PACE
36 X 10.8% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 5.7%
34 X 2.5%
33 X 0.6%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
Saddleback Ranch 2024-104

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD MILLWOOD RD TO PENDLETON RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MALABAR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK - RRFB (SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - FAWN RIDGE
CROSSWALKS AT FAWN RIDGE (sch)
9,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT FAWN RIDGE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO - (Except 7am-4pm, MON-FRI, Front of School)

OTHER NO PARKING & NO STOPPING ANYTIME / PAINTED BIKES LANES CUT OUT SECTION FOR SCHOOL DROP-OFF AND PICKUPS (NB) at School

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT DOWNHILL GRADE (SB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (NB) - YES / NO (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND and PAINTED ISLAND

AREAS OF RED CURB

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PORTOLA HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-105 This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and an elementary school. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, slight to gradual horizontal and vertical curves, areas of limited sight distance and no stopping any time except in front of the school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 44.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD MILLWOOD RD TO PENDLETON RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X X X X 4 2.5% 98.1%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 95.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 92.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.1% 82.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.9% 73.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.2% 64.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.9% 73.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.2% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 52.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.3% 43.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 34.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 26.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.8% 19.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 13.0%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 8.7%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 5.6%
X X X 3 1.9% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 161
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.0 %
File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-105

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD MILLWOOD RD TO PENDLETON RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.4%
48 X 98.1%
47 X 95.7%
46 X 92.5% }PACE
45 X 87.6% }PACE
44 X 82.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 73.9% }PACE
HCI
43 X 73.9% }PACE
42 X 64.0% }PACE
41 X 52.8% }PACE
40 X 43.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 34.2% }PACE
38 X 26.7% }PACE
37 X 19.9% }PACE
36 X 13.0% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.7%
34 X 5.6%
33 X 2.5%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.0 %
Saddleback Ranch 2024-105

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD PENDLETON RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CEDAR RIDGE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH
25 MPH (Advisory at Alder)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RIDGELINE / RANCHWOOD
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGELINE (sch) / RANCHWOOD (sch)
3,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGELINE (sch) / RANCHWOOD (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (Heavy Parking at Club House & Park) OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of)
PAINTED BIKE LANES / BIKES SHARE THE ROAD LEGEND (n/o Ranchwood)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE CONSTANT GRADUAL-MODERATE UPHILL GRADE (NB) HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND /2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CLUB HOUSE-PICKLE BALL-POOL / GOLF COURSE PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDS & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-106 This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting), club house pool and pickleball courts and elementary school at Pendleton Road. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, gradual to constant horizontal and vertical curves, and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 37.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.54 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD PENDLETON RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.6% 94.6%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 90.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 81.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 74.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 67.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 58.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 51.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.7% 44.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 36.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 28.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 21.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 13.1%
X X X X 4 3.1% 6.9%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.8%
25 X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 130
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.9 %
File: Saddleback Ranch 2024-106

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD PENDLETON RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 97.7%
40 X 94.6%
39 X 90.0%
38 X 86.2%
37 X 81.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 74.6% }PACE
35 X 67.7% }PACE
34 X 58.5% }PACE
33 X 51.5% }PACE
32 X 44.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 36.9% }PACE
30 X 28.5% }PACE
29 X 21.5% }PACE
28 X 13.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 6.9%
26 X 3.8%
25 X 1.5%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.9 %
Saddleback Ranch 2024-106

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SCL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.20
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.55

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES(SB) - 4 LANES (NB)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO
38,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / TRABUCO HILLS HIGH SCHOOL (in Mission Viejo at city limit) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Santa Margarita 2024-107
This segment of Santa Margarita Parkway has three (3) to four (4) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school at the south City limit in the City of Mission Viejo. Field observations include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, bike lane and no stopping any time. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 51.2 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.21 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X X 2 1.4% 98.6%
55 X X X 3 2.0% 97.3%
X X X X 4 2.7% 95.3%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 92.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 89.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 83.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 77.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 70.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.8% 62.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.8% 53.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 44.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 37.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 29.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 22.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 16.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 22.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 16.9%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 12.2%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.1% 8.8%
X X X 3 2.0% 4.7%
X X 2 1.4% 2.7%
X X 2 1.4% 1.4%

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 148
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
File: Santa Margarita 2024-107

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 99.3%
56 X 98.6%
55 X 97.3%
54 X 95.3%
53 X 92.6%
52 X 89.2% }PACE
51 X 83.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 77.0% }PACE
49 X 70.3% }PACE
48 X 62.2% }PACE
47 X 53.4% }PACE
46 X 44.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 37.2% }PACE
44 X 29.7% }PACE
43 X 22.3% }PACE
HCI
44 X 29.7% }PACE
43 X 22.3% }PACE
42 X 16.9%
41 X 12.2% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 8.8%
39 X 4.7%
38 X 2.7%
37 X 1.4%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 %
Santa Margarita 2024-107

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD RIDGELINE RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (Gertner) DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SADDLE CREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 59.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 49 - 58 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 66.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.26
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.09
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.09
TOTAL COLLISIONS 12 2.40 1.04

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS NONE

CROSSWALKS NONE
7,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS
BIKE LANES / BIKES SHERE ROAD (Areas of)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / YES

STREET LIGHTING NO

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NARROW ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / OPEN UNDEVELOPED LAND RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Santiago Cyn 2024-108
This segment of Santiago Canyon Road is a rural two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial at Live Oak Canyon Road and open undeveloped land. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph.

A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.

0.87 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD RIDGELINE RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (Gertner) DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
65 X X X 3 1.3% 99.2%
X X X 3 1.3% 97.9%
X X X X X X 6 2.5% 96.6%
X X X X X 5 2.1% 94.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.0% 91.9%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.7% 89.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.8% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.7% 80.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.9% 75.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.4% 69.9%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.4% 63.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 57.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.1% 42.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.8% 34.7%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 28.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.2% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.2% 13.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.2% 9.3%
X X X X X X X 7 3.0% 5.1%
45 X X X 3 1.3% 2.1%
X X 2 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

0.0%

0.0%
40 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 236
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 66.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.6 %
File: Santiago Cyn 2024-108

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD RIDGELINE RD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT (Gertner) DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 99.6%
65 X 99.2%
64 X 97.9%
63 X 96.6%
62 X 94.1%
61 X 91.9%
60 X 89.0%
59 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
58 X 80.5% }PACE
57 X 75.8% }PACE
56 X 69.9% }PACE
55 X 63.6% }PACE
54 X 57.2% }PACE
53 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
52 X 42.8% }PACE
51 X 34.7% }PACE
50 X 28.0% }PACE
49 X 20.8% }PACE
48 X 13.6% - - - - - -15PCT
47 X 9.3%
46 X 5.1%
45 X 2.1%
44 X 0.8%
43 X 0.0%
HCI
44 X 0.8%
43 X 0.0%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 66.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.6 %
Santiago Cyn 2024-108

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SHASTA LAKE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH
30 MPH & 35 MPH (Advisory at curves)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.40
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.20
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 1.61

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO WAY / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO WAY ((sch) / WINDING WAY (sch) / LAKE FOREST (sch) 3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO WAY ((sch) / WINDING WAY (sch) / LAKE FOREST (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING & NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of)

BIKES MAY USE FULL LANE / NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)

AREAS OF RED CURB

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SERRANO CREEK PARK / SCHOOL / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Serrano 2024-109 This segment of Serrano Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), Serrano Creek park, an elementary school, and business at Lake Forest Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 41.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) collisions involved in a serious injury, and one involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
0 0.0% 98.4%
0 0.0% 98.4%
45 X 1 0.8% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 88.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 81.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.9% 65.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.9% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 44.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 35.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 35.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 10.9%
X X X X 4 3.1% 4.7%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
File: Serrano 2024-109

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:55 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.2%
48 X 99.2%
47 X 98.4%
46 X 98.4%
45 X 98.4%
44 X 97.7%
43 X 94.6% }PACE
42 X 88.4% }PACE
41 X 81.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
40 X 75.2% }PACE
39 X 65.9% }PACE
38 X 55.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 55.0% }PACE
37 X 44.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 35.7% }PACE
35 X 25.6% }PACE
34 X 17.1% }PACE
33 X 10.9% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 4.7%
31 X 1.6%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
Serrano 2024-109

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MOHAWK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH
30 MPH (Advisory at curves)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.37
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.37
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 2.23

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)
3,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO (NB) - YES (SB)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME & NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / PAINTED ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK / SCHOOL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Serrano 2024-110 This segment of Serrano Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 38.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved in a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.41 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X X X 3 2.3% 99.2%
X X X 3 2.3% 97.0%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 94.7%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 90.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.1% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.6% 79.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.6% 72.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12.1% 64.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.4% 52.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.4% 52.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 40.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.8% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 24.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 17.4%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.5% 12.1%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 7.6%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.8%
X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 132
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
File: Serrano 2024-110

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 99.2%
42 X 97.0%
41 X 94.7%
40 X 90.9% }PACE
39 X 85.6% }PACE
38 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 72.0% }PACE
36 X 64.4% }PACE
35 X 52.3% }PACE
34 X 40.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 34.1% }PACE
32 X 24.2% }PACE
31 X 17.4% }PACE
30 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.6%
28 X 3.8%
27 X 1.5%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 %
Serrano 2024-110

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SILVER SPUR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.30
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.30
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.30
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 2 0.40 0.59

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / EL TORO
4,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

AREAS OF RED CURB / NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /HIGH SCHOOL / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Serrano 2024-111 This segment of Serrano Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), high school and business at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 39.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
0 0.0% 99.4%
45 X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.2%
X X 2 1.2% 97.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 96.4%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 92.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.4% 82.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.5% 63.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.7% 53.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.5% 63.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.7% 53.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 42.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 35.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 27.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.4% 20.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 15.5%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 11.3%
X X X X 4 2.4% 8.3%
X X X X 4 2.4% 6.0%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 3.6%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 168
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
File: Serrano 2024-111

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.4%
46 X 99.4%
45 X 99.4%
44 X 98.2%
43 X 97.6%
42 X 96.4%
41 X 92.9%
40 X 89.9% }PACE
39 X 82.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 77.4% }PACE
HCI
38 X 77.4% }PACE
37 X 69.6% }PACE
36 X 63.1% }PACE
35 X 53.6% }PACE
34 X 42.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 35.1% }PACE
32 X 27.4% }PACE
31 X 20.8% }PACE
30 X 15.5%
29 X 11.3% - - - - - -15PCT
28 X 8.3%
27 X 6.0%
26 X 3.6%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
Serrano 2024-111

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF COMMERCENTRE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.8 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Round-a-bout) 1,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Round-a-bout)

CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / OLYMPUS

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / CLUB HOUSE / POOL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Serrano Summit 2024-112
This segment of Serrano Summit Drive is a two-lay roadway. The adjacent land uses are club house, community pool, residential (non-fronting) and commercial. Field notes state the roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 39.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 31 to 40 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.

0.26 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 2.7% 95.6%
X X X 3 2.7% 92.9%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 90.3%
40 X X X X X X X 7 6.2% 85.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 63.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 55.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 47.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 37.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.2% 29.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 14.2%
30 X X X X 4 3.5% 7.1%
X X 2 1.8% 3.5%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 113
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.1 %
File: Serrano Summit 2024-112

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.1%
44 X 97.3%
43 X 95.6%
HCI
43 X 95.6%
42 X 92.9%
41 X 90.3%
40 X 85.8% }PACE
39 X 79.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 74.3% }PACE
37 X 63.7% }PACE
36 X 55.8% }PACE
35 X 47.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 37.2% }PACE
33 X 29.2% }PACE
32 X 23.0% }PACE
31 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
30 X 7.1%
29 X 3.5%
28 X 1.8%
27 X 0.9%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.1 %
File:Serrano Summit 2024-112

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TAMERISK PEACHWOOD (S) TO PEACHWOOD (N)
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:30 AM - 9:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF VISTA HERMOSA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
25 MPH & 30 MPH Advisory

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PEACHWOOD (S) / PEACHWOOD (N)

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD (N)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVE & SWEEPING "C" CURVES (meets Peachwood at both ends) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO CENTERLINE STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK / COMMINITY POOL-TENNIS COURTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Tamarisk 2024-113
This segment of Tamerisk is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting). Field notes state that the roadway has gradual to sweeping horizontal curves. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 29.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 23 to 32 mph, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TAMERISK PEACHWOOD (S) TO PEACHWOOD (N)
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:30 AM - 9:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
35 100.0%
X X 2 2.0% 100.0%
X X 2 2.0% 98.0%
X X X X 4 4.0% 96.0%
X X X X X X 6 6.1% 91.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12.1% 85.9%
X X X X X X X 7 7.1% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 8.1% 66.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 13.1% 58.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11.1% 45.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11.1% 34.3%
X X X X X 5 5.1% 23.2%
X X X X 4 4.0% 18.2%
X X X X 4 4.0% 14.1%
X X X 3 3.0% 10.1%
20 X X 2 2.0% 7.1%
X X 2 2.0% 5.1%
X X 2 2.0% 3.0%
0 0.0% 1.0%
X 1 1.0% 1.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 99
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.1 %
File: Tamarisk 2024-113

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TAMERISK PEACHWOOD (S) TO PEACHWOOD (N)
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:30 AM - 9:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 98.0%
32 X 96.0% }PACE
31 X 91.9% }PACE
30 X 85.9% }PACE
29 X 73.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 66.7% }PACE
27 X 58.6% }PACE
26 X 45.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 34.3% }PACE
24 X 23.2% }PACE
23 X 18.2% }PACE
22 X 14.1% - - - - - -15PCT
21 X 10.1%
20 X 7.1%
19 X 5.1%
18 X 3.0%
17 X 1.0%
16 X 1.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.1 %
Tamarisk 2024-113

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO LANE BAKE LANE TO CUL-DE-SAC
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SUPERIOR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 19 - 28 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 86.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH Advisory (at North end)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - TOLEDO ENTRANCE (N) / TOLEDO ENTRANCE (S)

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE (Except Bend at Bake Lane)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Toledo Ln 2024-114 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.61 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO LANE BAKE LANE TO CUL-DE-SAC
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.7% 99.1%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 97.4%
X X X X 4 3.5% 94.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 91.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 85.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 78.3%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.2% 67.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 55.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 47.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 36.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 27.8%
20 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 20.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 10.4%
X X X 3 2.6% 5.2%
X X 2 1.7% 2.6%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 19 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
File: Toledo Ln 2024-114

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO LANE BAKE LANE TO CUL-DE-SAC
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 99.1%
30 X 97.4%
29 X 94.8%
28 X 91.3% }PACE
27 X 85.2% }PACE
26 X 78.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
25 X 67.8% }PACE
24 X 55.7% }PACE
23 X 47.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 36.5% }PACE
21 X 27.8% }PACE
20 X 20.0% }PACE
19 X 10.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
18 X 5.2%
17 X 2.6%
16 X 0.9%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 19 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
Toledo Ln 2024-114

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
4,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / SERRANO / BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / SERRANO (sch) / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NO OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / TENNIS CLUB
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Toledo Wy 2024-115
This segment of Toledo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a tennis club. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 48.7 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 41 to 50 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.78 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 99.2%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 96.6%
50 X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 92.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.1% 86.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 81.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.0% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.3% 62.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 53.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.8% 44.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.2% 38.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 28.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 20.3%
40 X X X X X X 6 5.1% 14.4%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 9.3%
X X X 3 2.5% 5.1%
X X 2 1.7% 2.5%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
35 0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 118
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
File: Toledo Wy 2024-115

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.2%
51 X 96.6%
50 X 92.4% }PACE
49 X 86.4% }PACE
48 X 81.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 73.7% }PACE
46 X 62.7% }PACE
45 X 53.4% }PACE
44 X 44.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 38.1% }PACE
42 X 28.0% }PACE
41 X 20.3% }PACE
40 X 14.4% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 9.3%
38 X 5.1%
HCI
38 X 5.1%
37 X 2.5%
36 X 0.8%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.4 %
Toledo Wy 2024-115

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF TIMBERLAND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.24
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.71

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
4,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-MODERATE UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Toledo Wy 2024-116 The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.1%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 97.4%
X X X X 4 2.6% 94.2%
50 X X X X X 5 3.2% 91.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 88.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.0% 70.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.3% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 51.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.1% 42.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 27.1%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 20.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.2% 15.5%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 10.3%
X X X X 4 2.6% 7.1%
X X 2 1.3% 4.5%
35 X X X 3 1.9% 3.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.3% 4.5%
35 X X X 3 1.9% 3.2%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 155
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
File: Toledo Wy 2024-116

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.1%
52 X 97.4%
51 X 94.2%
50 X 91.6%
49 X 88.4%
48 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 77.4% }PACE
46 X 70.3% }PACE
45 X 61.3% }PACE
44 X 51.0% }PACE
43 X 42.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 35.5% }PACE
41 X 27.1% }PACE
40 X 20.6% }PACE
39 X 15.5% }PACE
38 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 7.1%
36 X 4.5%
35 X 3.2%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
Toledo Wy 2024-116

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 45.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.23
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 5 1.00 1.17

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch)/ EL TORO
5,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/8/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch)/ EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLCOCK

ARES OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / HIGH SCHOOL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Toledo Wy 2024-117 This segment of Toledo Way is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field observations include school age pedestrians. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 45.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.45 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 99.2%
X X X X X 5 4.0% 97.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 93.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 88.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 81.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 73.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 65.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 57.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 50.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.9% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 27.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 19.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 13.5%
35 X X X X 4 3.2% 8.7%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X 4 3.2% 8.7%
X X 2 1.6% 5.6%
X X X 3 2.4% 4.0%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 126
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
File: Toledo Wy 2024-117

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOLEDO WAY RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 4/8/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.2%
48 X 97.6%
47 X 93.7%
46 X 88.1% }PACE
45 X 81.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
44 X 73.8% }PACE
43 X 65.9% }PACE
42 X 57.1% }PACE
41 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 42.1% }PACE
39 X 34.1% }PACE
38 X 27.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 27.0% }PACE
37 X 19.8% }PACE
36 X 13.5% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.7%
34 X 5.6%
33 X 4.0%
32 X 1.6%
31 X 0.8%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
Toledo Wy 2024-117

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY (W) TO ALTON PKWY (E)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COOK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON (WEST) / ALTON (EAST)
3,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON (WEST) / ALTON (EAST)

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON (WEST) / ALTON (EAST)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLANE / PAINTED ISLAND

TOWNE CENTER MEETS ALTON PKWY (WEST) AND (EAST)

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Towne Ctr 2024-118
This segment of Towne Centre Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial and a small section of residential (non-fronting). With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.

0.78 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY (W) TO ALTON PKWY (E)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
50 X X 2 1.4% 97.8%
X 1 0.7% 96.4%
X X X 3 2.2% 95.7%
X X X X 4 2.9% 93.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 90.6%
45 X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.7% 80.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 71.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 63.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 71.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.1% 58.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 47.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 41.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 34.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 28.3%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 21.0%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 15.9%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 10.1%
X X X X 4 2.9% 6.5%
X X 2 1.4% 3.6%
X X 2 1.4% 2.2%
30 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 138
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
File: Towne Ctr 2024-118

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY (W) TO ALTON PKWY (E)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.3%
50 X 97.8%
49 X 96.4%
48 X 95.7%
47 X 93.5%
46 X 90.6%
45 X 85.5%
44 X 80.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 71.7% }PACE
HCI
43 X 71.7% }PACE
42 X 63.8% }PACE
41 X 58.0% }PACE
40 X 47.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 41.3% }PACE
38 X 34.8% }PACE
37 X 28.3% }PACE
36 X 21.0% }PACE
35 X 15.9% }PACE
34 X 10.1% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 6.5%
32 X 3.6%
31 X 2.2%
30 X 0.7%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
Towne Ctr 2024-118

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ALTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
8,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON / MARKET PL / ENTERTAINMENT / BAKE

CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / MARKET PL / ENTERTAINMENT / BAKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME

NO SHOULDERS / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE
ADJACENT LAND USE SHOPPING CENTERS (Dense) / ELECTIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Towne Ctr 2024-119
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
45 X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.5%
0 0.0% 98.5%
X 1 0.7% 98.5%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 97.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.1% 93.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.9% 85.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.1% 79.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.6% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 61.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.2% 55.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 61.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.2% 55.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.1% 41.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 33.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.3% 29.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 19.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.3% 14.0%
X X X X 4 2.9% 3.7%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 136
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
File: Towne Ctr 2024-119

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.3%
44 X 98.5%
43 X 98.5%
42 X 98.5%
41 X 97.8%
40 X 93.4%
39 X 85.3% }PACE
38 X 79.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 79.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 71.3% }PACE
36 X 61.8% }PACE
35 X 55.1% }PACE
34 X 41.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 33.8% }PACE
32 X 29.4% }PACE
31 X 19.1% }PACE
30 X 14.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 3.7%
28 X 0.7%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
Towne Ctr 2024-119

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ALTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH (NB)
15 MPH (Advisory at Curves)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.29
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 2.32

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / LAKE FOREST / PORTOLA

CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / LAKE FOREST / PORTOLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK

NO SHOULDERS / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES (s/o Bake)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (SB) - YES / NO (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERIAL / RESIDENTIAL (Multi-Family-NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SOUTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Towne Ctr 2024-120
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 35 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.

0.59 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.9% 98.6%
X X X X 4 2.9% 95.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 92.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.9% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.2% 73.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 61.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 15.1% 54.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 15.1% 54.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.8% 38.8%
X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 28.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 23.0%
X X 2 1.4% 15.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 14.4%
X X X 3 2.2% 7.9%
X X X X 4 2.9% 5.8%
X X 2 1.4% 2.9%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
25 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 139
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
File: Towne Ctr 2024-120

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 98.6%
41 X 95.7% }PACE
40 X 92.8% }PACE
39 X 85.6% }PACE
38 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 73.4% }PACE
36 X 61.2% }PACE
35 X 54.0% }PACE
34 X 38.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 28.1% }PACE
32 X 23.0% }PACE
31 X 15.8%
30 X 14.4% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.9%
28 X 5.8%
27 X 2.9%
26 X 1.4%
25 X 0.7%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
Towne Ctr 2024-120

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO PEACHWOOD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PASEO SOMBRE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 60.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.08
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.11

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PEACHWOOD / VIA DEL RIO / PASEO TRANQUILLO / PASEO SOMBRA

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / VIA DEL RIO / PASEO TRANQUILLO / PASEO SOMBRA 17,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / VIA DEL RIO / PASEO TRANQUILLO / PASEO SOMBRA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (at Bake) / CHURCH / CEMETERY RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Trabuco 2024-121
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, church and cemetery. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets.

Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO PEACHWOOD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
0 0.0% 98.9%
0 0.0% 98.9%
0 0.0% 98.9%
0 0.0% 98.9%
65 X 1 0.6% 98.9%
X 1 0.6% 98.3%
X 1 0.6% 97.8%
X 1 0.6% 97.2%
X X 2 1.1% 96.6%
60 X X X X X X 6 3.4% 95.5%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 92.2%
X 1 0.6% 89.4%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 88.8%
X X X X 4 2.2% 86.0%
55 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 83.8%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 78.8%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 76.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 72.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 67.6%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.4% 63.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 54.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 48.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.1% 44.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 34.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.5% 29.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 19.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 15.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 12.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 2.8% 15.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 12.3%
X X 2 1.1% 8.4%
40 X X X X 4 2.2% 7.3%
X 1 0.6% 5.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 4.5%
X 1 0.6% 2.8%
X 1 0.6% 2.2%
35 X 1 0.6% 1.7%
0 0.0% 1.1%
X 1 0.6% 1.1%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 60.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
File: Trabuco 2024-121

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO PEACHWOOD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 98.9%
68 X 98.9%
67 X 98.9%
66 X 98.9%
65 X 98.9%
64 X 98.3%
63 X 97.8%
62 X 97.2%
61 X 96.6%
60 X 95.5%
59 X 92.2%
58 X 89.4%
57 X 88.8%
56 X 86.0%
55 X 83.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 78.8%
53 X 76.0% }PACE
52 X 72.1% }PACE
51 X 67.6% }PACE
50 X 63.1% }PACE
49 X 54.7% }PACE
48 X 48.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 44.7% }PACE
46 X 34.6% }PACE
45 X 29.1% }PACE
44 X 19.6% }PACE
43 X 15.1%
HCI
43 X 15.1%
42 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
41 X 8.4%
40 X 7.3%
39 X 5.0%
38 X 4.5%
37 X 2.8%
36 X 2.2%
35 X 1.7%
34 X 1.1%
33 X 1.1%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 60.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
Trabuco 2024-121

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD PEACHWOOD TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LAKE FOREST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.03
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 3 0.60 0.09
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 8 1.60 0.24
.

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PEACHWOOD / LAKE FOREST

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / LAKE FOREST
21,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT PEACHWOOD / LAKE FOREST

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

File: Trabuco 2024-122
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.85 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD PEACHWOOD TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.2% 99.5%
55 X X X X X X 6 3.2% 97.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.9% 94.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.5% 89.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.6% 82.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.3% 74.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.6% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.7% 55.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.4% 45.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.1% 27.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4% 18.9%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 13.5%
X X X X X X X 7 3.8% 10.8%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 7.0%
X X X X 4 2.2% 4.3%
40 X X X 3 1.6% 2.2%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

0.0%
35 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 185
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
File: Trabuco 2024-122

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD PEACHWOOD TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.5%
55 X 97.3%
54 X 94.1% }PACE
53 X 89.2% }PACE
52 X 82.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 74.1% }PACE
50 X 63.8% }PACE
49 X 55.1% }PACE
48 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 34.1% }PACE
46 X 27.0% }PACE
45 X 18.9% }PACE
44 X 13.5% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 10.8%
42 X 7.0%
41 X 4.3%
40 X 2.2%
39 X 0.5%
38 X 0.0%
HCI
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 %
Trabuco 2024-122

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF RIDGE ROUTE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2 0.40 0.11
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 18 3.60 0.99

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
27,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL-GAS STATION / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Trabuco 2024-123
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane arterial. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business.

The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.2 mph and 10 mph pace range of 42 to 51 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
55 X X X 3 1.3% 99.6%
X X 2 0.9% 98.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 97.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.3% 90.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.3% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 9.9% 77.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.2% 67.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.5% 60.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 52.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.6% 45.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.5% 37.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.3% 29.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.8% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.9% 17.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 12.1%
X X X X X X X 7 3.1% 8.1%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 4.9%
X X X 3 1.3% 2.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.4% 0.9%
35 X 1 0.4% 0.4%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 223
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 45.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.0 %
File: Trabuco 2024-123

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.6%
54 X 98.2%
53 X 97.3%
52 X 94.6%
51 X 90.1% }PACE
50 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 77.6% }PACE
48 X 67.7% }PACE
47 X 60.5% }PACE
46 X 52.0% }PACE
45 X 45.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
44 X 37.7% }PACE
43 X 29.1% }PACE
42 X 22.9% }PACE
41 X 17.0%
40 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 8.1%
38 X 4.9%
HCI
38 X 4.9%
37 X 2.2%
36 X 0.9%
35 X 0.4%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 45.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.0 %
Trabuco 2024-123

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF EL TORO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.10
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.10
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 1.05

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO

CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
26,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Entire Block)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (Ridge Route & El Toro) / MEMORIAL PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Trabuco 2024-124
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road and Ridge Route Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph.

A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, two (2) involved a pedestrian, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.

0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 99.3%
X X 2 1.3% 97.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.0%
X 1 0.7% 94.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 93.3%
X 1 0.7% 92.7%
X X 2 1.3% 92.0%
X X X X 4 2.7% 90.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 88.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 83.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 76.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 70.7%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 62.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 58.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 13.3% 52.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.3% 39.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 23.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 23.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 14.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 10.7%
X X 2 1.3% 6.7%
X X 2 1.3% 5.3%
X X 2 1.3% 4.0%
X X 2 1.3% 2.7%
35 X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 150
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.7 %
File: Trabuco 2024-124

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.3%
58 X 97.3%
57 X 96.0%
56 X 94.0%
55 X 93.3%
54 X 92.7%
53 X 92.0%
52 X 90.7%
51 X 88.0% }PACE
50 X 83.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 76.7% }PACE
48 X 70.7% }PACE
47 X 62.0% }PACE
46 X 58.7% }PACE
45 X 52.7% }PACE
44 X 39.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 30.0% }PACE
HCI
44 X 39.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 30.0% }PACE
42 X 23.3% }PACE
41 X 14.7% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.7%
39 X 6.7%
38 X 5.3%
37 X 4.0%
36 X 2.7%
35 X 1.3%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.7 %
Trabuco 2024-124

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CHERRY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.14
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.27

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes drops to 2 Lanes-s/o El Toro) 18,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (3 Lanes drops to 2 Lanes-s/o El Toro)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO / CHERRY

CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / CHERRY

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Entire Block)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES (Over Wash)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
SHORT DISTANCE BTWN SIGNALS (Surveyed on Green lights only) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (El Toro) / WASH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Trabuco 2024-125
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.5 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 99.4%
55 X 1 0.6% 97.8%
X 1 0.6% 97.2%
X X 2 1.1% 96.7%
X 1 0.6% 95.6%
X X X X 4 2.2% 95.0%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.8% 81.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 73.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 66.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.0% 58.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 48.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 43.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 35.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 43.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 35.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 28.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 25.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 18.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 15.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 10.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 6.7%
35 X X X X 4 2.2% 5.0%
X X 2 1.1% 2.8%
X 1 0.6% 1.7%
0 0.0% 1.1%
0 0.0% 1.1%
30 X X 2 1.1% 1.1%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 180
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.3 %
File: Trabuco 2024-125

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T

TRABUCO ROAD EL TORO RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.4%
55 X 97.8%
54 X 97.2%
53 X 96.7%
52 X 95.6%
51 X 95.0%
50 X 92.8%
49 X 88.3% }PACE
48 X 81.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 73.3% }PACE
46 X 66.1% }PACE
45 X 58.9% }PACE
44 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 43.9% }PACE
HCI
43 X 43.9% }PACE
42 X 35.6% }PACE
41 X 28.3% }PACE
40 X 25.6% }PACE
39 X 18.3%
38 X 15.0% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 10.0%
36 X 6.7%
35 X 5.0%
34 X 2.8%
33 X 1.7%
32 X 1.1%
31 X 1.1%
30 X 1.1%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.3 %
Trabuco 2024-125

APPENDIX C

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUBJECT:

AMENDMENT OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST PERSONNEL RULES AND

REGULATIONS
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF THE LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT OF

THE PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Personnel Rules and Regulations (“Personnel Rules”) is a guiding policy for the administration of staff. The Personnel Rules govern employee conduct in performing the City’s important business. The Personnel Rules were last updated by the City Council on June 18, 2024.

As with other policies, the Personnel Rules need to be updated periodically to address changes in the law, best practices, and the City’s operations. Following a thorough review, staff have proposed amendments to one (1) chapter and Exhibit A (“Benefits Matrix”).

The update reflects changes to state law and employee benefits. Exhibit A updates the dental insurance premiums provided to full-time employees for the 2025 calendar year, resulting in a savings of $2,987.

If approved, the updated Personnel Rules and Regulations will be effective January 1, 2025. Staff will continue monitoring legal developments in this area of public employee personnel management and present future amendments to the Personnel Rules as needed.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Lake Forest Municipal Code (“Municipal Code”) Sections 2.60.030 and 2.60.050 grant authority to the City Manager to adopt personnel policies and procedures, subject to the City Council's review (Attachment 1). The Municipal Code stipulates that the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, is

3 3
0 6
responsible for administering the City’s personnel system. The City’s Personnel Rules, initially established at the City's incorporation and last updated in June 2024, have been amended over the years to reflect changes in law, benefit provisions, and the need to modernize policies and procedures.

Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Recruitment, Selection, Appointment, and Probation Chapter 3 Discipline
Chapter 4 Complaint and Grievance Procedure
Chapter 5 Separation from Service
Chapter 6 Compensation and Hours
Chapter 7 Employee Benefits
Chapter 8 Leave
Chapter 9 Miscellaneous (includes policies such as Non-Discrimination, Family and Medical Leave, etc.)
Exhibit A Benefits Matrix

DISCUSSION:

Staff are proposing two changes to the Personnel Rules to reflect changes in state law and Exhibit A (“Benefits Matrix”). All proposed changes are summarized in Table 1 below. Staff has also attached an underline/strike-out version of the Personnel Rules highlighting these changes (Attachment 2).

Table 1: Summary of Proposed Changes to Rules and Regulations and Exhibit A
Chapter 8 – Leave
(Attachment 2, Page 43)
Section Change

8.4 Paragraph 2, Section B,
Permitted Uses Of Sick Leave
Add language to expand the use of
sick leave to include domestic
violence, sexual assault, or stalking
per State law.
3 3
0 6
Exhibit A
Section Change
N/A
To update the benefits matrix for
2025 and incorporate the monthly
premiums offered to full-time
employees for dental insurance.

In December 2023, the City enrolled in Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management (“PRISM”), a Joint Powers Authority. The PRISM pool provides significantly lower premiums, and as a member, the City has benefited from these negotiated competitive rates, directly reducing the costs associated with dental premiums. Through PRISM’s pooled purchasing power, the City has access to rates typically unattainable on the open market. For the 2025 calendar year, rates obtained through PRISM would yield cost savings of $2,987 in dental premiums. This reduction contributes to an overall budget decrease in employee benefit expenses.

Given the dynamic nature of public employee laws and regulations, staff will continue to monitor those subject areas and others that may affect the City’s Personnel Rules and return to the City Council on an as-needed basis. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 3), which revises the Personnel Rules.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended action will result in an estimated decrease of $2,987 for the calendar year 2025 due to the decrease in the City’s cost of the dental insurance premiums provided to full time employees. The 2023-2025 Operating Budget has sufficient funds available for the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Lake Forest Municipal Code Excerpts

2. Proposed Changes to the Personnel Rules and Regulations– Redline Version

3. Resolution Amending Personnel Rules and Regulations
Initiated By: Shelly Cisneros, Human Resources Manager
Submitted By: Keith Neves, Assistant City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
5 4
1 9
5 ATTACHMENT 1
5 4
1 9
5 2.60.030 - Administration.

The City Manager shall administer the City personnel system and may delegate any of the powers and duties of such administration to any officer or employee of the City or may recommend that such powers and duties be performed under contract as provided in Section 2.60.130 of this chapter. The City Manager shall:

A. Act as the appointing authority for the City in accordance with Section 2.08.060(C) of this Code; B. Administer all the provisions of this chapter and of the personnel policies and procedures not specifically reserved to the Council;
C. Prepare or cause to be prepared personnel policies and procedures and revisions. The City Attorney shall approve the legality of such policies and procedures and revisions prior to their submission and to their implementation;
D. Recommend to the City Council personnel policy issues involving financial commitments such as, but not limited to, pay rates and employee benefit programs; E. Prepare or cause to be prepared, a position classification plan, including class specifications and revisions of the plan;
F. Prepare or cause to be prepared, a plan of compensation and revisions thereof, covering all classification titles for authorized City positions. The plan and any revisions thereof shall become effective upon approval of the Council;
G. Have the authority to discipline employees in accordance with this chapter and the personnel policies of the City;
H. Provide for the recruitment and selection of City employees based upon open or promotional recruitments and perform any other duty that may be required to administer the personnel system.

I. The City Manager or designated Personnel Director shall have the authority to request from the State Department of Justice a copy of the State Summary Criminal History Information for any position — regular, part-time, or volunteer — involving the care or supervision of children, minors, the elderly, the handicapped, or the mentally impaired, or for any other position with the City wherein such information is deemed important to the selection process. The City Manager or designated Personnel Director shall utilize the process and procedure set forth in Chapter 2.62 of this Code. (Ord. 165 § 1 (Exh. B (part)), 2007)
5 4
1 9
5 2.60.050 - Personnel policies—Adoption and amendment.

Personnel policies shall be prepared and may be amended from time to time by the City Manager, subject to review by the City Council. Any policy matters involving the commitment of financial resources shall be recommended and must be approved by the City Council prior to implementation. The policies shall govern the personnel system, including but not limited to:

A. Preparation, installation, revision and maintenance of a position classification plan covering all positions in the competitive service, including employment standards and qualifications for each class;
B. Preparation, revision and administration of a plan of compensation directly correlated with the position classification plan providing a rate or range of pay for each class; C. Open and promotional recruitments to fill regular positions; D. The making of temporary and emergency appointments;
E. Establishment of probationary testing periods;
F. Transfer, promotion, demotion and reinstatement of employees; G. Evaluation of the job performance of employees;
H. Separation of employees from the City service;
I. Content, maintenance and use of personnel records and forms; and, J. The establishment of any necessary appeal procedures. (Ord. 165 § 1 (Exh. B (part)), 2007)
ATTACHMENT 2
1 5
3 7
6 3

PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 PERSONNEL SYSTEM
In order to establish an equitable and uniform procedure for dealing with personnel matters, to attract to municipal service the best and most competent persons available, to assure that appointments and promotions of employees will be based on merit and fitness, and to provide a reasonable degree of security for qualified employees, the following personnel system is hereby adopted.

1.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS
Paragraph 1: Adoption, Amendment, and Revision. Municipal Code Sections 2.60.030 and 2.60.050 authorize the adoption and revision of “personnel policies and procedures” by the City Manager, subject to review by the City Council except those policy matters which require commitment of financial resources which will be recommended to and approved by the City Council. These Personnel Rules shall be adopted and amended from time to time as “personnel policies and procedures” in accordance with the Municipal Code. The City Manager shall determine which, if any, policies, or revisions will be recommended to and adopted by the City Council.

Paragraph 2: Fair Employment. No employee shall be promoted, demoted, terminated, or in any way favored or discriminated against, because of political opinions or affiliations, genetic characteristics or information, race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, , sex, gender identity, gender expression, gender (including pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding or related medical conditions), physical or mental disability, medical condition, marital status, military or veteran status, sexual orientation, age (40 and over), reproductive health decision making or any basis protected by applicable federal, state, or local law; or because of the exercise of his or her rights under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act.

Paragraph 3: Violation of Rules. Violation of the provisions of these Personnel Rules shall be grounds for rejection or discipline, up to and including dismissal.
2 5
3 7
6 3

1.3 COMPETITIVE SERVICE
The provisions of these Personnel Rules shall apply to all officers and employees in the competitive service of the City. The following officers and employees shall be excluded from the competitive service:

A. Members of the City Council.

B. Members of the appointive boards, commissions, and committees.

C. Persons engaged under contract to supply expert, professional, or technical services for a definite period of time.

D. Volunteer personnel, who receive no regular compensation from the City.

E. City Attorney and City Manager.

F. Department Directors, City Clerk, City Treasurer, and other management positions designated in writing by the City Manager, except where expressly provided.

G. Emergency employees who are hired to meet the immediate requirements of an emergency condition, such as an extraordinary fire, flood, or earthquake that threatens life or property.

H. Any position is primarily funded under a State or Federal employment program.

I. Part-time, seasonal, provisional, or temporary employees. Also excluded are employees who are not full-time regular employees.

J. Any new position hereafter created by the City Council, unless declared by the City Council to be in the competitive service at the time of creation or thereafter.

Employees excluded from the competitive service under this Section shall serve at the will of their appointing authority.
3 5
3 7
6 3

1.4 APPLICABILITY OF RULES TO CERTAIN POSITIONS EXCLUDED FROM

COMPETITIVE SERVICE
Paragraph 1: City Manager, Department Directors, City Clerk, City Treasurer, Probationary Employees, and Designated Positions.

The following provisions of these Personnel Rules do not apply to the City Manager, Department Directors, City Clerk, City Treasurer, probationary employees, and designated positions, unless otherwise specified:

Chapter 2: Sections: 2.1, 2.2 Paragraph 1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.9 Paragraphs 2 and 3
Chapter 3: All
Chapter 5: Section: 5.2
Chapter 6: Sections: 6.1, 6.3
Paragraph 2: Part-Time, Seasonal, Provisional, and Temporary Employees.

The following provisions of these Personnel Rules do not apply to part-time, seasonal, provisional, or temporary employees, unless otherwise specified:

Chapter 2: Sections: 2.1, 2.2 Paragraph 1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.9 Chapter 3: All
Chapter 5: Section: 5.2
Chapter 6: Sections: 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 6.9
Chapter 7: Sections: 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.7 Paragraph 2, 7.9, 7.10,

7.11, 7.12.

Chapter 8: Sections: 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.9, 8.11

1.5 PERSONNEL OFFICER
The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee shall be the Personnel Officer except in those instances provided for in the Lake Forest Municipal Code. The City Manager may delegate any of the powers and duties conferred on the Personnel Officer under the Personnel Ordinance and these Personnel Rules to any other officer or employee of the City or may recommend that such powers and duties be performed under contract as provided in Section 9.4, “Right to Contract for Special Services.” The Personnel Officer shall:
Administer all the provisions of the Personnel Ordinance and of the Personnel Rules not specifically reserved to the City Council.
4 5
3 7
6 3
Prepare and recommend to the City Manager Personnel Rules and revisions and amendments to such Personnel Rules subject to City Council review, or approval when deemed required.
Prepare or cause to be prepared a Position Classification Plan, including class specifications and revisions of the Plan. The Plan, and any revisions to it, shall become effective upon approval by the City Council.
Provide for the publishing or posting of notices of vacant positions within the competitive service, the receiving of applications therefore, the conducting and grading of any necessary tests, and the certification to the appointing authority of a list of all persons eligible for appointment to the appropriate position in the competitive service.

1.6 PERSONNEL REPORTS AND FILES
Paragraph 1: Personnel File. The Personnel Officer shall maintain a service or personnel file for each employee in the service of the City showing the name, title, or position held; the department to which assigned; salary; change in employment status; and such other information as may be considered pertinent.

Paragraph 2: Change of Status Report. Every appointment, transfer, promotion, demotion, change of salary rate, and any other temporary or permanent change in status of employees shall be reported to the Personnel Officer in such manner as he/she may prescribe.

Paragraph 3: Maintenance of Personnel Records. The City will maintain a copy of each employee’s personnel record for a period of not less than six years after termination.

Paragraph 4: Inspection of Personnel Records. Current and former employees have a right to inspect their personnel files. When requested, the City will make the contents of the personnel files available to current or former employees, or their representatives, at reasonable intervals and at reasonable times, but no later than 30 calendar days from the date which the employer receives the written request and will provide a copy upon request. 5 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 2

RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, APPOINTMENT, AND PROBATION

2.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointments to vacant positions in the competitive service shall be made in accordance with the Personnel Rules. Appointments and promotions shall be based on merit and fitness to be ascertained by selection techniques that will test fairly the qualifications of candidates. Examinations, such as written tests, personal interviews, performance tests, physical agility tests, evaluation of daily work performance, work samples, or any combination of these or other tests, may be used and conducted to aid in the selection of qualified employees. In any examination, the Personnel Officer may include, in addition to competitive tests, a qualifying test or tests and set minimum standards thereof.

B. Appointments shall be made by the City Council when required by the Lake Forest Municipal Code for City Council appointments; otherwise, they shall be made by the City Manager.

2.2 APPLICATIONS AND APPLICANTS
Paragraph 1: Announcement. When vacancies occur in the competitive service, all such vacancies shall be publicized by such methods the Personnel Officer deems appropriate.

Paragraph 2: Application Forms. Applications shall be made as prescribed on the announcement of the vacancy. Application forms shall require information covering training, experience, and other pertinent information, and may include references, background checks, and fingerprinting.

Paragraph 3: Disqualification. The Personnel Officer may reject any application which indicates on its face that the applicant does not possess the minimum qualifications required for the position. Applications may be rejected if the applicant is deemed unable or unfit to perform the duties of the position, has made any false statement of any material fact, or practiced any deception or fraud in his or her application.

Paragraph 4: Proof of Right to Work. Under Federal law, all newly hired employees must produce original documentation establishing their identity and right to work in the United States, and complete INS Form I-9, 6 5
3 7
6 3
swearing that they have a right to work in the United States. The City will require new employees to complete the I-9 and provide documentation on the first day of work. Required documentation must be presented to the Personnel Officer, who will be responsible for processing the documents.

Failure to comply with this paragraph will result in termination.

2.3 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
Paragraph 1: Physical examination. All applicants, who are offered a position with the City of Lake Forest, may be required to undergo a pre- employment physical examination at the City’s expense if the Personnel Officer determines such an examination is necessary for the position (job related and consistent with business necessity) to determine whether an applicant is able to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without accommodations. All applicants entering the same job classification will be subject to the same examination.

Paragraph 2: Drug Testing. As part of the City’s pre-employment screening process, applicants who are deemed “safety sensitive” as determined by the Personnel Officer who are offered employment with the City of Lake Forest, will be required to pass a test for controlled substances, under procedures described in the City of Lake Forest’s Drug and Alcohol- Free Workplace Policy.

2.4 EXAMINATIONS
Paragraph 1: Nature and Types of Examinations. The selection of techniques used in the examination process shall be impartial and relate to those subjects which, in the opinion of Department Directors, and approved by the Personnel Officer, fairly measure the relative capacities of the persons examined to execute the duties and responsibilities of the class to which they seek to be appointed. Examinations shall consist of selection techniques that will test fairly the qualifications of candidates. When an oral board or panel is used, the majority of the board or panel shall be composed of persons, who are not City personnel, with similar experience or expertise in the field as the position being filled.

Paragraph 2: Promotional Examinations. Promotional examinations may be conducted whenever, in the opinion of the Department Directors and Personnel Officer, they are required. Only regular, probationary, and part- time employees who meet the requirements set forth in the promotional examination announcements may compete in promotional examinations. 7 5
3 7
6 3
Paragraph 3: Conduct of Examinations. The City may contract with any competent agency or individual for the preparation and/or administration of examinations. In the absence of such a contract, the Personnel Officer will see that such duties are performed. The Personnel Officer shall arrange for the use of the necessary equipment and facilities to conduct the examinations.

2.5 EMPLOYMENT LISTS
Paragraph 1: Employment Lists. As soon as possible after the completion of the selection process, the Personnel Officer shall prepare and maintain an employment list consisting of the names of candidates who qualified.

Paragraph 2: Duration of Lists. Employment lists shall remain in effect for one year unless sooner exhausted or abolished by the Personnel Officer upon the recommendation of the appointing authority. An employment list may be extended for six months upon approval of the Personnel Officer.

Paragraph 3: Lay Off and Reemployment Lists. The names of regular and probationary employees laid off, or demoted in lieu of lay off, shall be placed on reemployment lists for two years for those classes requiring the same qualifications, duties, and responsibilities of the class from which lay off or demotion in lieu of lay off was made, unless such persons are sooner reemployed.

A. Persons whose names are placed on reemployment lists in accordance with this Paragraph, and who are reemployed within the prescribed period, shall be regarded as having been on unpaid leave of absence during this period of absence.

B. When a reemployment list is to be used to fill vacancies, the Personnel Officer shall certify all of the names on the list for consideration by the appointing authority.

Paragraph 4: Removal of Names From List. The name of any person appearing on an open-employment, reemployment, or promotional- employment list shall be removed by the Personnel Officer if the eligible person requests in writing that his/her name be removed, if he/she fails to respond to a notice of certification mailed to his/her last known address, or for any of the reasons specified in these Personnel Rules. The person affected shall be notified of the removal of his/her name by a notice mailed 8 5
3 7
6 3
to his or her last known address. The names of persons on promotional- employment lists who resign or are terminated from the service shall automatically be dropped from such lists.

Paragraph 5: Employment Lists Confidential. Employment lists are confidential and the relative position of an eligible person on a list or his/her score shall not be made available except to the person or to the head of the department or division where he/she is considered for appointment.

2.6 METHOD OF FILLING VACANCIES
Paragraph 1: Types of Appointments. All vacancies in the competitive service shall be filled by transfer, demotion, reinstatement, or from eligible persons certified by the Personnel Officer from an appropriate employment list. In the absence of persons eligible for appointment in these ways, provisional appointments may be made in accordance with the Personnel Ordinance and these Personnel Rules.

Paragraph 2: Notice to Personnel Officer. If a vacancy in competitive service is to be filled, the appointing authority shall notify the Personnel Officer in the manner prescribed.

Paragraph 3: Transfer or Demotion. If the appointing authority determines to fill the vacancy by transfer or demotion, the Personnel Officer shall post notice of such vacancy in areas accessible to all personnel and utilize all reasonable means to assure that employees are informed.

Interested employees will be expected to apply to the Personnel Officer in the manner prescribed in the notice. The Personnel Officer shall certify the eligibility of those screened for availability with the Department Director of whom they are assigned and the appointing authority – if different.

Paragraph 4: Certification of Eligible Persons. If the appointing authority determines to fill the vacancy from an employment list, certification shall be made from an appropriate promotional-employment list or an open-employment list.

A. When the appointing authority requests a vacancy be filled by appointment from a promotional-employment list or from an open-employment list, the Personnel Officer should certify (from the specified list of names) all individuals willing to accept appointment.

Paragraph 5: Appointment. After interviewing and investigating, the appointing authority shall make an appointment from among those certified 9 5
3 7
6 3
and shall immediately notify the Personnel Officer of the person appointed.

The Personnel Officer shall notify the appointee of the selection and the date for processing. The person accepting the appointment shall present himself/herself to the Personnel Officer, or the designated City representative, for processing on or before the date of appointment. If the applicant does not present himself/herself within such a period of time, he/she shall be deemed to have declined the appointment.

Paragraph 6: Provisional Appointment For Vacancies in Competitive Service.

A. In the absence of individuals willing to accept appointments from appropriate employment lists, a provisional appointment may be made by the appointing authority of a person meeting the minimum training and experience qualifications for the position. The term of a provisional appointment shall not exceed six (6) months.

B. When a position in the competitive service is temporarily vacant due to a leave of absence of the employee appointed to that position, the appointing authority may provisionally appoint an individual to temporarily serve in that position while the permanently appointed individual is on leave. The term of such provisional appointments shall be at-will and may exceed six (6) months.

C. A provisional employee may be removed at any time without the right of appeal or hearing. No special credit shall be allowed in meeting any qualifications or in the giving of any test or the establishment of any open- employment or promotional-employment lists for service rendered under a provisional appointment.

2.7 PROBATIONARY PERIOD
Paragraph 1: Term of Probationary Period. All original appointments shall be tentative and subject to a probationary period of one (1) year unless the employee is notified of a longer period. Promotional appointments shall be subject to a probationary period of six (6) months unless the employee is notified of a longer period. Probationary periods may be extended if an employee is absent from work for more than one month total during their probationary period.

Paragraph 2: Purpose of Probationary Period. The primary purpose of the probationary period is to provide an effective environmental orientation for the employee, educating him/her in prevailing management 10 5
3 7
6 3
attitudes, policies, and procedures, and training him/her in the tasks associated with the assignment. The probationary period shall be regarded as a part of the testing process and shall be utilized for closely observing the employee’s work, for securing the most effective adjustment of a new employee to this position, and for determining if he/she is capable of meeting the requirements of the assignment.

Paragraph 3: Extend Probationary Period.

A. The Department Director may determine to extend the probationary period if more on-the-job training is warranted, or if further observation of the employee is desired based on unique circumstances to allow a full and fair evaluation of the probationary employee during the probationary period. The Department Director, upon approval of the City Manager, may extend a probationary period of a maximum of six (6) months, but extensions may not be used to uniformly change the length of the probationary period.

B. A leave of absence in excess of fifteen (15) working days will cause the employee’s probationary period to automatically be extended by the length of the leave of absence. An employee who is suspended will have his or her probation automatically extended by the length of the suspension unless the suspension results in the employee’s termination.

Paragraph 4: Rejection of Probationer. During the probationary period, an employee may be rejected at any time by the appointing authority without cause and without the right of appeal. Additionally, no probationary employee has property or vested rights to his or her position with the City and will not be entitled to an appeal or a hearing. Written notification of rejection shall be given by the appointing authority to the employee and a copy filed with the Personnel Officer. Notice shall be given to the employee personally or by mail at the employee’s last known address. This paragraph will apply only to original appointments and not to promotional appointments.

Paragraph 5: Rejection Following Promotion. Any employee rejected during the probationary period following a promotional appointment is entitled to be reinstated to the position from which the employee was promoted if it is vacant. If the employee’s former position has been deleted or abolished, or is not vacant, the employee may be placed in a vacant position in the same classification from which the employee was promoted. If there are no such vacant positions, the employee shall be terminated from City service. An employee will also not be reinstated to the position or class 11 5
3 7
6 3
if the employee is terminated in the manner provided in the Personnel Ordinance and these Personnel Rules.

Paragraph 6: Regular Appointment Following Probationary Period.

If the service of the probationary employee has been satisfactory to the Department Director, then the Department Director is entitled to file with the appointing authority or Personnel Officer a written evaluation to such effect and stating that the retention of such an employee in the competitive service is desired after completing probation. The probationary employee shall become a regular employee at the end of the probationary period unless the probationer is rejected, during the probationary period in accordance with Section 2.7, Paragraph 4 above.

2.8 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
Following an offer of employment, an applicant will be subject to a background investigation, which may include fingerprinting for a criminal records search, checking references and employment history, a DMV check, and a credit check for applicable positions. An applicant must successfully undergo any investigation deemed necessary by the Personnel Officer as a prerequisite for employment. A criminal conviction will not be an automatic bar to employment, and the City will undertake an individualized assessment.

2.9 TRANSFER, PROMOTION, AND REINSTATEMENT
Paragraph 1: Transfer. No employee shall be transferred into a position for which the employee does not possess the minimum qualifications. Upon notice to the Personnel Officer, an employee may be transferred by the appointing authority, at any time, from one position to another position in the same or comparable class. For transfer purposes, a comparable class is one with the same maximum salary, involves the performance of similar duties, and requires the same basic qualifications.

If the transfer involves a change from one department to another, both Department Directors must consent thereto, unless the City Manager orders the transfer.

Transfer shall not be used to effectuate a promotion, demotion, or reduction, each of which may be accomplished only as provided in the Personnel Ordinance and these Personnel Rules. The employee may appeal the denial of transfer by the releasing department to the City Manager. The City Manager will review such actions to ensure that consideration is given to the employee’s rights and operational requirements of the City administration. The decision of the City Manager shall be final.
12 5
3 7
6 3
Paragraph 2: Promotion. The appointing authority may choose to fill vacancies in the competitive service by promotion.

Paragraph 3: Reinstatement. The appointing authority may reinstate a former employee, within two (2) years of the effective date of resignation, who resigned with a good record to a vacant position in the same or comparable class formerly held. Upon reinstatement, the employee shall be subject to the probationary period prescribed for the class. Credit for the former employment may be granted in computing salary, vacation, sick leave, or other benefits by the appointing authority.
13 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 3

DISCIPLINE

3.1 STANDARD FOR DISCIPLINE
Disciplinary measures may be taken for reasonable cause. The extent of the disciplinary action taken shall be commensurate with the offense, provided that the prior employment history of the employee may also be considered pertinent. Reasonable cause may include violation of the Personnel Ordinance, these Personnel Rules; any written City policy or City procedure; any department rule or regulation; any act of insubordination or act detrimental to the public service of the City; failure to adhere to or follow policies and rules; refusal or inability to comply with the duties of the position occupied by the employee; or any other type of misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance relating to the employee’s duties, office, or position.

3.2 RANGE OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION
The types of disciplinary actions are verbal reprimands, written reprimands, suspensions without pay, involuntary demotion, reduction in pay, and termination. For each type of disciplinary action, certain steps and due process procedures must be followed. Before taking any action, a supervisor or Department Director who is considering a disciplinary action should discuss the circumstances of the situation with the Personnel Officer unless the particular situation requires immediate action. A supervisor or Department Director, after considering the specific circumstances of each violation, may determine which disciplinary action(s) is(are) appropriate.

3.3 PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE
Disciplinary action may, but is not required to be taken in progressive steps as follows:

Paragraph 1: Verbal Reprimands. The supervisor should hold a meeting with the employee. The purpose of the meeting is to explain the employee’s conduct or acts which are in violation of City rules, policies, or practices, or are not meeting the expectations of the position; to remind the employee of the behavior that is expected in the future and the consequences of not meeting the performance expectations. The supervisor shall document the meeting by preparing a memorandum on the matters discussed. This memorandum to file shall be retained by the supervisor.

Paragraph 2: Written Reprimands. The supervisor should prepare a written reprimand. The written reprimand shall constitute notice of the infraction(s) including date, time, and circumstances, as well as a reminder 14 5
3 7
6 3
that failure to correct the infractions may result in further disciplinary actions up to and including termination. The supervisor shall present the written reprimand to the employee, who shall be asked to acknowledge receipt, by signing and dating the written reprimand, which shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file and a copy given to the employee.

A. Employees who have received written reprimands are entitled to the following due process:

A meeting with the supervisor to receive the written reprimand and to be informed of its contents.

The employee has five (5) business days from receipt of the written reprimand in which to write a response and/or to request and to informally meet with the person issuing the reprimand to discuss its contents. The employee must submit a written response to the Department Director, to be forwarded to the issuer of the written reprimand for consideration. The issuer of the written reprimand will then consider the response and either withdraw the written reprimand or submit it to the Personnel Officer, to be placed in the employee’s personnel file. The employee’s written response, if any, will also be placed in the employee’s personnel file.

Paragraph 3: Suspension Without Pay. An employee may be suspended without pay for up to thirty (30) days. Employees who are exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) shall only be suspended without pay for less than one full week for violations of written workplace conduct rules (not performance or attendance issues). Exempt employees may be suspended without pay for one week or in increments of full weeks for any cause. When placing an employee on suspension for forty (40) hours or less, the supervisor shall prepare a memorandum describing the disciplinary action, the supervisor’s expectations, the employee’s failure to meet the expectations, and a warning that the failure to comply with the reasonable expectations of the supervisor in the future may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. Employees who are placed on suspension for forty (40) hours or less are entitled to the same due process rights as listed above in Paragraph 2 Section A. The suspension, if any, shall not be served until the procedures described above have been completed.

When placing a competitive service employee on suspension without pay for more than forty (40) hours, the Department Director shall follow all of the 15 5
3 7
6 3
steps listed under Section 3.4, Paragraph 2, subsections (A) - (E) and Section

3.11. Paragraph 4: Involuntary Demotion. The Department Director may demote an employee whose ability to perform his or her required duties falls below standards or for other disciplinary purposes. No employee shall be demoted to a position for which he or she does not possess the minimum qualifications. An employee may be demoted to a classification having a lower salary range. When demoting a competitive service employee, the supervisor shall follow all of the steps listed under Section 3.4, Paragraph 2, subsections (A) - (E) and Section 3.11.

Paragraph 5: Reduction in Pay. An employee may be reduced in salary rate of pay. When reducing the salary of a competitive service employee for disciplinary reasons, the Personnel Officer shall follow all of the steps listed under Section 3.4, Paragraph 2, subsections (A) - (E) and Section 3.11.

Paragraph 6: Termination. When it is necessary to terminate a competitive service employee, the Department Director shall follow all of the steps listed under Section 3.4, Paragraph 2, subsections (A) - (E) and Section 3.11.

3.4 IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINE
Paragraph 1: Imposition by Supervisor/Department Director.

A. Any discipline described in Section 3.3, Paragraphs 1 - 3, (provided suspension without pay is for forty (40) hours or less) may be imposed by the supervisor with the concurrence of the Department Director.

B. Appeal Rights. Any discipline described in Section 3.3, Paragraph 3 (provided the suspension without pay is for forty (40) hours or less) shall have the right to appeal the action to the Personnel Officer in writing. The employee shall initiate an appeal by the filing of a written appeal with the Personnel Officer within ten (10) business days of the imposition of discipline. The written appeal shall set forth the reasons and basis for the employee’s disagreement with the discipline.

The Personnel Officer shall prepare and deliver to the affected parties a written decision on the appeal. The decision of the Personnel Officer shall be the final administrative decision of the City. 16 5
3 7
6 3
Paragraph 2: Imposition by Department Director/Personnel Officer/City Manager or Designee.

A. Any discipline described in Section 3.3, Paragraph 3 (provided the suspension without pay is for more than forty (40) hours) or Paragraphs 4, 5, and 6 may only be imposed by the Department Director with the prior written concurrence of the Personnel Officer, the City Manager or designee.

B. Notice of Intent to Discipline Required: A notice of intent to discipline shall be given to the employee whenever the City intends to impose any discipline described in Section 3.3, Paragraph 3 (provided the suspension without pay is for more than forty (40) hours) or Paragraphs 4, 5, and 6.

C. Content of Notice of Intent to Discipline: The notice of intent to discipline shall inform the employee of the disciplinary action intended and the effective date of the intended action. Further, it shall set forth the nature of the infraction(s), any previous disciplinary actions taken, how the employee’s conduct has had an adverse impact on the City’s or department’s operation, all materials upon which the action is based, and notification that the employee has the right to respond, orally or in writing to the proposed discipline.

Whether delivery is made in person or by mail, the notice of intent to discipline shall contain a “statement of delivery or mailing” indicating the date on which the notice of intent was personally delivered or deposited in the United States mail. Such date of delivery or mailing shall be the “date of issuance” of the notice of intent.

D. Written Response to Notice: The employee shall be entitled to respond in writing to the notice of intent to discipline. Such response, if any, must be received by the Personnel Officer, or a designee, within five (5) business days from the date of issuance of the notice of intent to discipline if personally served and ten (10) business days if served by mail.

E. Oral Response to Notice: An employee who receives a notice of intent to discipline may request to respond to the notice of intent. The request for such a response shall be delivered to the Personnel Officer, or a designee, within five (5) business days of the issuance of the notice of intent to discipline if personally served and ten (10) business days if served by mail.

Upon the receipt of a request for an oral response, the Personnel Officer, or a designee, shall schedule a meeting to take place with the employee and supervisor to receive the oral response. An employee who has requested an oral response in accordance with this subsection may at their own election 17 5
3 7
6 3
and cost retain representation for the presentation of the oral response conducted under this subsection.

F. Personnel Officer Determination: Following the review of the oral or written response, the Personnel Officer, or a designee — with the Personnel Officer’s approval — shall issue and deliver to the employee a written statement of its decision to uphold, modify, or reject the proposed disciplinary action. Such action to be taken may not include discipline more severe than that described in the notice of intent; however, the City may reduce such discipline without the issuance of an additional notice of intent.

3.5 PLACEMENT IN PERSONNEL FILE
Official disciplinary action documents shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file.

Official disciplinary documents include disciplinary documents and any evidence supporting the discipline provided to employees in accordance with this Chapter, except that documentation of a verbal reprimand will be retained by the supervisor and not placed in the personnel file.

3.6 EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Whenever a disciplinary action is taken, the employee may be asked to sign the document to acknowledge that it was received. Signing to acknowledge receipt by an employee does not indicate that the employee agrees with the facts stated in the document or agrees to the discipline. If an employee refuses to sign the document, the supervisor or Personnel Officer delivering the document will note the employee’s refusal to sign the document and that the employee has received the document.

3.7 ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
Paragraph 1: Investigatory Leave. An employee may be placed on an Investigatory leave with pay to allow the employee’s supervisor to review the facts of an alleged violation. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53243, et seq. which became effective of January 1, 2012, if an employee is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of his/her office or position, and the employee has been provided with administrative leave pay pending an investigation, the employee shall be required to fully reimburse such amounts paid. For this Section, abuse of office or position means either:
(1) an abuse of public authority, including waste, fraud, and violation of the law under color of authority; or (2) a crime against public justice, including a crime described in Title 7 commencing with Section 92 of the Penal Code. 18 5
3 7
6 3
Paragraph 2: Leave Pending Disciplinary Action. An employee may be placed on Administrative leave with pay pending an employee’s response to the notice of intent and a determination by the Personnel Officer, or a designee, of the disciplinary action.

3.8 EMERGENCY SUSPENSION
An employee may be removed from the workplace immediately without pay pending an investigation because of an employee’s apparent gross misconduct which has resulted in a potential emergency situation, including, but not limited to, situations which may endanger life or property. Such removal shall not exceed twenty-four (24) hours, at which time the employee shall be given a notice of intent to impose discipline, or returned to full-pay status. If no discipline is imposed, the employee will be repaid for any time off without pay.

3.9 TIME EXTENSIONS
Any time limitations or requirements, as set forth under Chapter 3 may be extended or changed by mutual written agreement of all parties.

3.10 DELIVERY OF NOTICE
When notice is required, the notice shall be given to the affected employee either by delivery of the notice of intent to the employee in person; or by placing the notice of intent in the United States mail, first class, postage paid, and by certified mail, return receipt requested, in an envelope addressed to the employee’s last known home address. It shall be the responsibility of the employee to inform the Personnel Officer in writing, of his or her current home address and of any change in such address, and the information so provided shall constitute the employee’s “last known home address.” Such personal delivery or mailing shall be presumed to provide actual notice to the affected employee.

3.11 RIGHT OF APPEAL
A. Employees shall have the right to appeal any disciplinary action described in Section 3.3, Paragraph 3 (provided the suspension without pay is for more than forty (40) hours), Paragraph 4, Paragraph 5, and Paragraph 6 to the City Manager or designee. This right is limited where the right to appeal is specifically prohibited by Chapter 2.60 of the Lake Forest Municipal Code, these Personnel Rules, or elsewhere. The right to appeal provided in accordance with these Personnel Rules is exhausted with an appeal to the City Manager level.
19 5
3 7
6 3
B. All appeals shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in these Personnel Rules.

3.12 RULES ON APPEAL TO THE CITY MANAGER
Paragraph 1: Right of Appeal. Any employee in the competitive service shall have the right to appeal to the City Manager, within seven (7) business days of any discipline as described in Section 3.3, Paragraph 3 (provided the suspension without pay is for more than forty (40) hours), Paragraph 4, Paragraph 5, and Paragraph 6, except in instances where the right of appeal is specifically prohibited by these Personnel Rules.

Paragraph 2: Method of Appeal. Appeals shall be in writing, signed by the employee (appellant), and filed with the Personnel Officer who shall, within three (3) business days after receipt of the appeal, inform the City Manager, or the appointing authority, and such other persons or officers named or affected by the appeal, of the filing of the appeal. The appeal shall be addressed to the City Manager, explaining the matter appealed from and setting forth therein a statement of the action desired by the appellant with his/her reasons, therefore. The formality of a legal document is not required.

Paragraph 3: Notice. Upon the filing of an appeal, the City Manager may reject it if the appeal is untimely, ambiguous, incomplete, or appeals an issue that is not subject to appeal under these Personnel Rules.

The City Manager may also direct the Personnel Officer, or designee, to set a date for a hearing on the appeal, before the City Manager or designee, not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of filing.

Paragraph 4: Investigation. The City Manager or designee may request information relevant to the matter as he/she may deem necessary, and such information shall be made a part of the record of the proceedings.

Paragraph 5: Hearing. The appellant or his/her representative may appear personally before the City Manager or designee at the time and place of the hearing. The parties may produce relevant oral or documentary evidence at the hearing. The City’s case shall be stated first, and at the conclusion, opposition material may then be presented by the appellant.

Rebuttal matters which are not repetitive may be allowed at the discretion of the City Manager or designee. The conduct and decorum of the hearing shall be under the control of the City Manager or designee, with due regard to the rights and privileges of the parties appearing before him or her. Hearings 20 5
3 7
6 3
need not be conducted according to technical rules relating to evidence and witnesses. The hearing shall be closed to the public unless the appellant, in writing, requests an open hearing.

Paragraph 6: Subpoenas. A subpoena may be issued when it is deemed necessary to secure the presence of a witness or evidence at a hearing before the City Manager or designee. The party requesting a subpoena must submit the request to subpoena (either evidence or a witness) to the Personnel Officer. The Personnel Officer shall determine if the request for subpoena is appropriate. If the request is appropriate, the Personnel Officer shall cause the subpoena to be prepared and submit it for approval to the Mayor and City Clerk.

Paragraph 7: Findings and Decision. The City Manager or designee shall, within ten (10) business days after the conclusion of the hearing, certify his or her findings and decision in writing, which shall be the final administrative decision of the City.
21 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 4

COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

4.1 PURPOSE OF COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
It is the City’s purpose to provide an effective and acceptable system whereby employees can seek resolution of complaints or grievances, at the lowest possible level, on matters affecting their jobs. Department Directors and other managers excluded from the competitive service are not eligible to file grievances against the City. All levels of administration and supervision are expected to inform and encourage employees to discuss matters affecting their employment.

4.2 DEFINITIONS
A. Complaint: An allegation or charge by an employee that a wrong has been committed.

B. Complaint Procedure: The process by which a determination is made as to whether or not a wrong has been committed.

C. Grievance: An expressed claim by a regular employee that the City has violated, misinterpreted, or misapplied an obligation to the employee during their employment as such obligation is expressed and written in the City Personnel Ordinance, these Personnel Rules, or other written City policies. Disciplinary actions, the content of performance evaluations, rejection from probation, and denial of merit increases are not subject to the complaint or grievance procedure.

D. Grievance Procedure: The process by which the validity of a grievance is determined.

E. Representative: A person who, at the request of the employee or management, is invited to participate in grievance conferences.

4.3 COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
A. Step 1: The employee should present and review any complaint with the immediate supervisor. At least one conference shall be held between the employee and the immediate supervisor within two (2) business days after the employee has expressed the complaint. The 22 5
3 7
6 3
immediate supervisor is required to review every complaint and attempt to settle it as quickly and fairly as possible.

B. Step 2: If the action taken by the immediate supervisor is not satisfactory, the employee may take the complaint to successive levels of supervision up to and including the Personnel Officer. The decision of the Personnel Officer is the final administrative decision.

4.4 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Paragraph 1: Informal Grievance Procedure. The employee shall inform the immediate supervisor orally of the grievance and relevant facts within five (5) business days after the employee knew, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known, of the events giving rise to the grievance. At least one conference shall be held between the employee and the immediate supervisor within two (2) business days after the employee has expressed the grievance. The immediate supervisor shall orally advise the employee of the decision within five (5) business days following the conference.

Paragraph 2: Formal Grievance Procedure.

A. Step 1: If the grievance is not resolved informally, the employee shall put the grievance in writing and submit copies to the immediate supervisor no later than five (5) business days following completion of the informal grievance procedure. The written grievance shall include a citation of the sections of the Personnel Ordinance, Policy, or these Personnel Rules alleged to have been violated and the remedy sought by the employee. A conference shall be held between the employee and the immediate supervisor within two (2) business days after the written grievance is received. The supervisor shall review the grievance and render a written decision to the employee within five (5) business days following the date of the Step 1 grievance conference. The issuance of a decision will complete Step 1.

B. Step 2: In the event that the grievance is not resolved in Step 1, the employee may submit it to the Department Director no later than five (5) business days following completion of Step 1. A conference shall be held between the employee and the Department Director within two (2) business days from the receipt of the Step 2 grievance. The Department Director shall have five (5) business days following the Step 2 grievance conference, in which to review the matter. At the 23 5
3 7
6 3
conclusion of this review, a decision in writing shall be given to the employee. The issuance of a decision will complete Step 2.

C. Step 3: In the event that the grievance is not resolved in Step 2, the employee may submit it to the Personnel Officer or designee no later than five (5) business days following completion of Step 2. A conference may be held between the employee and the Personnel Officer within two (2) business days from the receipt of the Step 3 grievance. The Personnel Officer shall have ten (10) business days following the Step 3 grievance conference in which to review the matter. At the conclusion of this review, a decision in writing shall be given to the employee. The decision issued by the Personnel Officer is the final administrative decision of the grievance procedure.

4.5 GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. No retribution or prejudice shall be suffered by employees making use of the grievance or complaint procedures by reason of such use.

B. Forms for filing and processing grievances and other documents necessary under these procedures shall be prepared by the Personnel Officer and given appropriate distribution.

C. All documents, communications, and records dealing with the processing of grievances shall be filed separately from personnel files.

D. Failure at any step of this procedure to communicate the decision on the grievance within specified time limits shall permit the aggrieved employee to proceed to the next step.

E. Failure at any step of this procedure to seek review of a decision on a grievance within specified time limits shall be deemed acceptance of the last decision rendered and waiver of further steps.

F. The time limits specified at any step in this procedure may be extended by mutual written agreement of all parties.

G. Reasonable time off without loss of pay shall be given to an employee who has a complaint or grievance and to the employee’s
representative in order to participate in the complaint and grievance procedures.
24 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 5

SEPARATION FROM SERVICE

5.1 DISCHARGE/TERMINATION
An employee in the competitive service may be discharged at any time by the appointing authority for reasonable cause. Discharge shall be pursuant to these Personnel Rules, the Personnel Ordinance, and in accordance with law. Employees not in the competitive service of the City are employed at-will and can be terminated at any time with or without cause and without notice.

5.2 LAY OFF
Paragraph 1: Elimination of Position. Whenever, in the judgment of the City Council, it becomes necessary in the interest of economy or because the necessity for a position no longer exists, the City Council may abolish any position or employment in the competitive service, and the employee holding such position or employment may be laid-off without the right of appeal.

Paragraph 2: Lay Off Procedure. The order of lay off of employees shall be established by the Personnel Officer on the recommendation of the Department Director involved. The Department Director shall take into consideration the job performance and length of service of employees in preparing a recommended lay off list, provided that no regular or probationary employees shall be laid off from their position in any department while any temporary, seasonal, provisional, or part-time employees are serving in the same class within the department. Employees to be laid off shall be given at least fourteen (14) days prior notice.

5.3 RESIGNATION
An employee wishing to leave City employment in good standing shall file a written resignation with the appointing authority, stating the effective date and reasons for leaving, at least two (2) weeks before leaving the service. Such time limit may be waived by the appointing authority if the employee furnishes evidence that such notice would result in unreasonable hardship or loss of opportunity. A statement as to the resigned employee’s service performance and other pertinent information shall be forwarded to the Personnel Officer. Failure to give notice as required by this Rule may be cause for denying future employment by the City.
25 5
3 7
6 3

5.4 JOB ABANDONMENT
An employee is deemed to have resigned if the employee is absent for five (5) consecutive business days without prior authorization and without notification during the period of absence. Employees have no right to appeal if deemed to have resigned as a result of job abandonment. Employees separated from employment for job abandonment will be reinstated with such charge removed from the employee’s record upon presentation of justification for absence such as severe accident, severe illness, false arrest, or mental or physical impairment which made it impossible not only to come to work, but also to communicate that inability to his/her supervisor.

5.5 RETIREMENT
Employees covered by the contract between the California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Lake Forest shall be eligible to retire based upon meeting CalPERS eligibility requirements.
26 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 6

COMPENSATION AND HOURS

6.1 CLASSIFICATION POLICY
Paragraph 1: Preparation of Plan. The Personnel Officer, or a person or agency employed for that purpose, shall ascertain, and record the duties and responsibilities of all classifications in the competitive service and, after consulting with the appointing authority and Department Directors, shall recommend a classification/compensation plan for such positions. The classification/compensation plan shall consist of classifications of positions in the competitive service defined by classification specifications, including the title. The classification/compensation plan shall be so developed and maintained that all positions similar with respect to duties, responsibilities, authority, and character of work are included within the same classification; and that the same schedules of compensation may be made to apply with equity under like working conditions to all positions in the same classification.

Paragraph 2: Adoption, Amendment, and Revision of Plan. The classification/compensation plan shall be adopted and may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. The Personnel Officer shall determine which, if any, amendments will be proposed to the City Council.

Amendments or revisions to the classification/compensation plan proposed by the Personnel Officer shall be publicly posted for at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to consideration by the City Council.

Paragraph 3: Allocation of Positions. Following the adoption of the classification/compensation plan, the Personnel Officer shall allocate every position in the competitive service to one of the classifications established by the Plan.

Paragraph 4: New Classification. When a new classification is created, before any position may be filled, the appointing authority shall notify the Personnel Officer, and except as otherwise provided by the Personnel Ordinance or these Personnel Rules, no person shall be appointed or employed to fill any such position until the classification/compensation plan has been amended to include such position.

Paragraph 5: Reclassification. When duties have changed so materially as to necessitate reclassification, such duties shall be allocated by the Personnel Officer to a more appropriate class. 27 5
3 7
6 3
Reclassifications shall not be used for the purpose of avoiding restrictions concerning demotions and promotions. When a reclassification occurs, no person shall be appointed or employed to fill the reclassified position until the classification/compensation plan has been amended to include a position not already in the plan.

6.2 FULL-TIME SALARY ADMINISTRATION POLICIES
The following salary policies shall govern the administration of the compensation plan for all full-time classifications:

A. The minimum rate is normally the hiring rate for the grade. An employee may be assigned, upon appointment, to a rate other than the normal entering salary rate upon the recommendation of the Department Director, and with approval of the City Manager when it is decided that such action is in the best interest of the City.

B. The comprehensive wage and salary plan is based on a 40-hour work week for all full-time employees.

6.3 PART-TIME WAGE ADMINISTRATION POLICIES
The following salary policies shall govern the administration of the wage schedule for part-time classifications:

A. An employee shall be assigned, upon appointment, to an hourly wage rate upon the recommendation of the Department Director and with approval of the City Manager. The wage must be that as set forth in the wage schedule.

B. The wage is an hourly rate and represents the comprehensive rate.

C. The wage schedule shall be adopted by Resolution of the City Council.

D. Part-time employees shall be eligible for a step increase after working at least 500 hours, completing one (1) year of service, and receiving a “Meets Minimum Job Requirements” performance evaluation overall rating. If an employee works less than 500 hours after one (1) year of service, they will be eligible for the increase upon reaching 500 hours, or upon the completion of two (2) years of service, whichever comes first. The effective date of the increase shall be the employee’s anniversary date, or upon reaching the 500 hours. Part-time employees can be eligible for a double step increase for 28 5
3 7
6 3
outstanding performance upon the approval by the Department Director and City Manager.

E. Part-time employees promoted within one (1) month of their eligibility for a step increase will receive a double step increase upon promotion. Part-time employees promoted within three (3) months of their eligibility for a step increase are eligible for a double step increase upon promotion subject to approval by the Department Director and City Manager.

6.4 PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN (Does not apply to the City Manager or the City Attorney).

Paragraph 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Pay for Performance Plan is to establish a compensation plan and policy that will not only attract, retain, and motivate people with a high degree of commitment and excellent skills to the City for employment, but will compensate employees equitably for the value of the work they perform and the contributions their efforts make to achieving the City’s goals and long-term objectives. The Plan will recognize and reward employees for the results they achieve and the behaviors they demonstrate consistent with the City’s vision and values.

With exceptional results for the citizens and stakeholders in the City will come exceptional rewards for those who accomplish them.

Paragraph 2: Background. While the City appreciates and values long-term service from good employees and rewards such service tenure through other programs, the City recognizes that compensation programs and policies are among the most critical tools in setting a high-performance bar and focusing energy, effort, and commitment to meeting and exceeding performance standards. This Plan is established to institutionalize the concept that salary ranges present the opportunity to earn higher salary and are not a guarantee of annual salary increases. When merit increases are awarded on the basis of work results compared to performance targets equitably established and communicated, employees are empowered to be individually accountable — to influence the pay they receive by the level of their performance.

Paragraph 3: Policy. The Pay for Performance Plan shall apply to all full-time employees who receive an annual performance evaluation except for the City Manager and City Attorney. Compensation adjustments under this Plan will be considered in conjunction with the employee’s annual performance evaluation. When an employee receives their annual performance review, an employee rating shall be determined based on the 29 5
3 7
6 3
criteria outlined in the evaluation form. Only employees who are recommended by their Department Director and approved by the City Manager as rating “Meets Minimum Job Requirements” or higher shall be eligible for adjustments to base pay and lump sum performance incentives in accordance with this Plan. An employee’s eligibility for salary movement may be based on three types of increase policies:

A. Performance – based merit increase policy. To be eligible to receive a performance – based merit increase, an employee must receive a performance rating based on the criteria outlined in the evaluation form used in the annual performance review of all full-time employees performed each year after the completion of the fiscal year. Employees who are hired during the fiscal year will be eligible for a pro-rata share of the performance- based merit increase based on the date of their hire and their rating. The following reflects the pro-rata percentage of the increase that will be available to employees based on their hire date:

Month of Hire Pro-Rata Percentage
July 100%
August 92%
September 84%
October 75%
November 67%
December 59%
January 50%
February 42%
March 34%
April 25%
May 17%
June 9%
30 5
3 7
6 3
The following conditions are also part of the performance-based merit increase policy:

The increase will be applied to salary if possible. However, the salary increase will be limited by the pay range maximum for each position.

Any amount of increase which cannot be accommodated within the pay range maximum will be paid in a lump-sum payment after the employee’s evaluation each year. However, employees are not eligible to receive a lump-sum performance incentive award unless they are at the maximum salary of their range.

All increases made under this policy, whether in the form of salary increases or lump-sum payments, must be according to law.

Lump-sum payments will not be included as compensation for purposes of disability benefits, vacation or holiday pay, or other pay related to City benefits to an employee.

Performance based merit increases are discretionary, and subject to City Manager review and approval. The City Manager is also authorized to adjust and/or limit the percentage increases based upon City financial conditions and budgetary considerations.

B. Promotional increase policy. A promotional increase will be granted to an employee who is promoted to a position at least one grade higher than the employee’s previous class. The amount of the increase will be as determined by the City Manager but will be a minimum increase of five (5%) percent over the prior salary. The City Manager’s determination will be based on, but not limited to, the “size” of the promotion (one grade versus five grades), the “time” since the employee’s last increase, and an assessment of the employee’s “readiness” for full job performance in the new position.

C. Structural movement increase policy. This policy provides for review and adjustment of the salary structure (if necessary) at least every two years.

When the salary structure is adjusted, employees with salaries that fall below new range minimums after any pay-for-performance increase will receive a structural increase to the minimum.

6.5 WORKING HOURS
Actual working hours will be determined on the basis of operational efficiency and the needs of the City. Supervisors will establish normal work schedules subject to approval of 31 5
3 7
6 3
the Department Director or the City Manager. Any deviation from normal work schedules shall be approved by the Department Director and the Personnel Officer.

6.6 PAY PERIODS AND PAY DAYS
All officers and employees of the City of Lake Forest shall be paid once every two weeks. Compensation shall be made available on an every-other Friday basis. In the event that a payday falls on a holiday, all warrants or checks in payment of compensation shall be made available on the day preceding the holiday.

6.7 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
The City can lawfully withhold amounts from an employee's wages only: (1) when required or empowered to do so by state or federal law, or (2) when a deduction is expressly authorized in writing by the employee to cover insurance premiums, benefit plan contributions or other deductions not amounting to a rebate on the employee's wages, or (3) when a deduction to cover health, welfare, or pension contributions is expressly authorized by a wage or collective bargaining agreement.

The following payroll deductions may be made from the salary of employees, where applicable:

Paragraph 1: Obligations to the City. The City, if deemed necessary by the City Manager, may deduct from the employee’s pay amounts equal to the obligations incurred through cash advances and damage to City property entrusted in the care of the employee, if said damage results from proven negligence on the part of the employee, when authorized by the employee.

Paragraph 2: Health and Life Insurance Benefits. The City will make deductions of those amounts authorized by the employee equal to the employee’s share of the health and life insurance benefits made available to the employee.

Paragraph 3: Income Tax -Medicare and Social Security. The City shall make deductions from the salary in the amount required by Federal and State law.

Paragraph 4: Public Employees’ Retirement System. The City shall deduct from the employee’s salary the amount required to be contributed to the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) after considering Section 7.2 “Public Employees’ Retirement System.” 32 5
3 7
6 3
Paragraph 5: Credit Union Deductions. The City shall deduct from the employee’s salary authorized deductions to the credit union and pay such amounts to the credit union.

Paragraph 6: Charitable Deductions. The City shall deduct charitable contributions periodically, when authorized by the employee.

Paragraph 7: Deferred Compensation. The City, upon
authorization by the employee, shall deduct eligible amounts as determined by the employee for contribution to the Deferred Compensation Program.

Paragraph 8: Miscellaneous Deductions. The City, upon
authorization by the employee, shall deduct amounts as determined by the employee.

Paragraph 9: Court Ordered Garnishment. The City shall deduct an amount from an employee’s salary when so ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

6.8 COMPENSATION FOR OVERTIME
Paragraph 1: General Overtime Provisions. Subject to approval of the City Manager and to the following provisions, an authorized supervisor may prescribe reasonable periods of overtime work to meet the operational needs of the department. Except as otherwise provided herein, overtime shall be paid at one and one-half times the hourly equivalent of the employee’s salary rate, based on the number of overtime hours actually worked.

A. Overtime is defined as work required by an authorized supervisor on a form approved by the Personnel Officer in excess of forty (40) hours in a work week.

B. In the event a bona fide emergency arises that dictates the need for immediate overtime and the employee’s supervisor is not available for authorization, the employee shall seek approval from a management employee prior to working the overtime and on the next working day shall prepare a memorandum to the responsible supervisor outlining the same.

C. Time off taken for purposes of sick leave, vacation, compensatory time, jury duty, holiday, bereavement, and other leave shall not serve as time worked when computing the forty (40) hours in a work week. 33 5
3 7
6 3
D. Compensatory-time In Lieu of Compensation. An employee is entitled to elect to receive compensatory-time in lieu of compensation for overtime.

The maximum hours of compensatory time that an employee shall receive in lieu of compensation is forty (40) hours. Once an employee has reached the maximum level of compensatory-time the City shall directly compensate the employee, until the employee’s balance of compensatory-time falls below the forty (40) hour maximum level.

Part-time employees are not entitled to receive compensatory time in lieu of overtime pay.

Paragraph 2: Personnel Not Entitled to Overtime. For the purpose of this section all exempt employees as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) are not entitled to overtime. However, these personnel may be granted compensation for work beyond the normal work week at the sole discretion of the City Manager.

Paragraph 3: Court Time. Employees, other than those
covered by Paragraph 2 above, who are required to appear in court during their off-duty hours in connection with City business shall receive overtime compensation at one and one-half times the number of hours they spend in court.

6.9 PAY FOR SERVING IN HIGHER JOB CLASSIFICATION
Paragraph 1: Prior Approval for Serving in Higher Job
Classification. Prior to an employee serving in a higher job classification for more than ten (10) consecutive business days, the Department Director must submit a memo to the City Manager requesting authorization. The memo must document the reason for need, estimated duration of service, and specific job responsibilities to be covered. The job responsibilities to be covered shall be approved by the Department Director and the Personnel Officer.

Paragraph 2: Pay for Serving in Higher Job Classification. An employee who is required, on the basis of acting appointment, to serve in a class with a higher salary range to that of the class in which the employee is normally assigned, shall receive the greater of the minimum salary rate of the higher salary range or a five percent (5%) increase from the employee’s current salary rate on the eleventh business day of serving. This increase is conditional provided the employee performs all of the duties and assumes all the responsibilities of the higher class, and only after the employee has 34 5
3 7
6 3
served more than ten (10) consecutive business days in the higher classification. The ten (10) consecutive days are exclusive of time off. If each of these conditions is met, the increase in salary shall be retroactive to the eleventh business day of such a qualifying service.

This section only entitles an employee to the salary of the higher class and not the benefits of the higher class. Compensation under this section shall not be permitted for any position which is subject to City Council appointment unless specifically authorized by the City Council.
35 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 7

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

7.1 HEALTH INSURANCE/CASH IN LIEU AND LIFE INSURANCE
Paragraph 1: Health Insurance. Full-time employees
and their dependents will have medical, dental, and vision insurance made available. The City retains the right to make health insurance benefits available to part-time employees in specific situations, at the part-time employee’s own cost. The City shall pay for medical, dental, and vision insurance for full-time employees and their dependents in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules. The City will pay the cost of the dental and vision plans offered by the City to full-time employees.

Additionally, employees may select to be covered by any one of the medical plans offered by the City.

Paragraph 2: Healthcare Insurance Benefits
Contribution. Eligible full-time employees will receive CalPERS or other comparable program medical insurance, that includes comparable costs, services, and providers, as determined by the City. Effective January 1, 2025, the contribution to employee premiums will be 90% of the highest HMO plan offered.

Paragraph 3: Cash In Lieu. Full-time employees that
have qualifying group health insurance through a spouse, domestic partner, parent, or another source, have the option to receive cash in lieu of City-sponsored health benefits. Employees who elect the Cash in Lieu option will receive $450 per month. As a condition of receiving such benefit, the employee must provide evidence, satisfactory to the City, that they have enrolled in medical insurance coverage comparable to coverage available through the City program which meets the definition of “minimum essential coverage” (as defined by the Affordable Care Act). Employees enrolled in individual coverage, such as Medicare, Medi-Cal, and Covered California, are not eligible to receive the Cash In Lieu option. Once elected, generally employees cannot change or cancel enrollment during the plan year unless there is a qualifying change in status.
36 5
3 7
6 3
Cash In Lieu is treated as taxable income and is reported on the employee’s W-2 statement for the tax year the employee receives the payment. Cash In Lieu is not considered compensation for retirement purposes.

Paragraph 3: Life Insurance Benefits. Group term life
insurance will also be made available to full-time employees. The amount of life insurance made available will be in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules.

7.2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM (Does not apply to part-time except as set forth below or required by law).

New Members
“New member” employees will be required to contribute at least fifty percent (50%) of the total annual normal cost rate or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater (equal sharing of normal cost) as dictated per PEPRA. Employee contributions will be deducted from employees’ base salary on a pre-tax basis and paid to PERS.

Classic Members
“Classic member” employees will be required to contribute the full seven percent (7%) employee contribution to PERS (employee normal contribution). Employee contributions will be deducted from employees’ base salary on a pre-tax basis and paid to PERS.

Part-Time Employees
Part-time employees who are eligible to participate in PERS will be required to contribute based upon their membership status as stated above. Employee contributions will be deducted from employees’ base salary on a pre-tax basis.

7.3 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION ALLOWANCE
Full-time employees are entitled to an annual allowance on a reimbursement basis for a physical examination by a licensed physician of the employee’s choice. Department Directors may receive a maximum allowance of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) each fiscal year. All other eligible employees may receive a maximum allowance of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) each fiscal year. This allowance can only be used to pay that portion of the cost of the physical, which is not covered by the employee’s insurance plan, or for preventive medical tests ordered by a physician as part of the physical exam such as 37 5
3 7
6 3
pap smear, cholesterol testing, mammogram, colonoscopy, diabetes testing, prostate cancer screening, and bone density testing.

7.4 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE
Some employees may receive a cell phone allowance to reimburse them for business use of their personal cell phones when it is determined that an employee may need to be available by telephone during non-business hours or when an employee is away from City facilities. The City will pay a cell phone allowance in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules.

7.5 WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
In the event that an employee incurs a job-related accident or injury, the employee may supplement his or her workers’ compensation payments with a fractional amount of earned sick leave or vacation to bring employee’s total compensation up to the employee’s maximum wage.

7.6 DEFERRED COMPENSATION
City employees, including part-time, provisional, temporary, and seasonal employees, are eligible for a Deferred Compensation Program. All contributions will be made by the employee.

7.7 TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES (Paragraph 2 does not apply to part-time, seasonal, provisional, or temporary employees).

Paragraph 1: Purpose of Training and Policy. It is the policy of the City to develop maximum efficiency in the performance of official duties by City employees by providing for the training of employees in the performance of their official duties, and by assisting them in fulfillment of their duties and responsibilities as well-informed citizens of the community.

A. The Personnel Officer shall monitor training programs, provide support and assistance to Department Directors in the administration of internal training programs, and submit recommendations to the City Manager.

B. The development of a continuous program of post-entry training as a part of the normal operation of City administration shall be encouraged. All other things being equal, priority consideration shall be given to training opportunities sponsored by and conducted by the City.

Paragraph 2: Tuition Reimbursement. The City will provide to employees a maximum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1,500) per fiscal year 38 5
3 7
6 3
per employee for tuition reimbursement for courses which relate to their job assignments, or when they are pursuing a degree in a major with potential value to the City. Tuition reimbursement may only be applied to the cost of tuition; incidental costs including those for books, parking, or other fees are not reimbursable. The City’s program is intended to qualify as an Educational Assistance Program under federal and state tax laws. The completion date of the class shall be used in determining the fiscal year in which the benefit shall apply.

A. To be eligible, an employee must:
(1) have full-time status for one year;
(2) receive no other duplicate benefits under any student aid programs;
(3) receive prior written approval by the employee’s supervisor on a form approved by the City Manager before registering for the class;
(4) forward to the Personnel Officer proof of payment of tuition for which City reimbursement is being requested; provide the Personnel Officer with evidence of satisfactory completion of a course (a “C” grade or better or a “pass” in a pass/fail grading system) within thirty (30) days of the end of the course. If good cause is demonstrated, the City Manager may approve payment of the course following registration and; (5) remain in City employment for at least one year after course completion.

B. The City may withhold from an employee’s paycheck sums equal to any amounts which may have been advanced or reimbursed if an employee does not provide evidence of satisfactory completion of a course within thirty (30) days; or, an employee terminates within one year after course completion.

7.8 EXPENSE ALLOWANCES
Paragraph 1: Mileage Reimbursement.

A. Expense claims for use of private automobiles must be approved by the Department Directors or City Manager. Such use will be 39 5
3 7
6 3
reimbursed at the official Internal Revenue Service (IRS) mileage rate that is in effect at the time of the travel. The City Manager may authorize advance payment of estimated expenses to employees, i.e., gasoline or mileage. The employee may elect to be reimbursed by actual mileage in lieu of the car allowance if an employee expects to exceed his/her allowance.

B. Use of private vehicles for business trips out of the metropolitan area may be approved by the City Manager when use of commercial transportation is not practical or for other acceptable justifications.

Paragraph 2: Car Allowance. (Does not apply to part-time, seasonal, provisional, or temporary employees). A car allowance instead of mileage for normal day-to-day operation may be made available in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules. The car allowance is not applicable to employees who are assigned a City vehicle or do not possess or use a private vehicle in the scope of their employment.

Paragraph 3: Travel Expenses. When air, rail, or public transportation is used, expenses for local transportation such as rideshare, taxicab or automobile rental will be allowed when necessary for the conduct of City business.

A. Expenses for lodging will be reimbursed in accordance with the City’s Expense Reimbursement Policy.

B. Expenses for meals will be reimbursed in accordance with the City’s Expense Reimbursement Policy.

7.9 LONG-TERM DISABILITY
Full-time employees are entitled to benefits under a Long-Term Disability Plan provided by the City. Employees who are eligible for the use of sick leave in accordance with Personnel Rule Section 8.4, Sub-paragraph 1.A(1) are entitled to benefits according to the plan waiting period.

7.10 SHORT-TERM DISABILITY
Full-time employees are entitled to benefits under a Short-Term Disability Plan provided by the City. Employees who are eligible for the use of sick leave in accordance with Personnel Rule Section 8.4, Sub-paragraph 1.A(1) are entitled to benefits according to the plan waiting period.
40 5
3 7
6 3

7.11 CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND MEMBERSHIPS
Employee attendance at conferences and seminars may be authorized in accordance with the City’s Travel Policy.

7.12 INSURANCE/BENEFIT PLANS
The City retains the right to select the vendor(s) for the various insurance plans and to amend the benefits provided by these various plans. Nothing shall limit the City’s right to make any changes or guarantee the continuation of the benefits as outlined in these policies.
41 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 8
LEAVE

8.1 VACATION LEAVE
Paragraph 1: Full-Time Employees. Employees working full-time for the City accrue vacation hours each pay period according to the following schedule:

After completion of the following years of continuous service employees begin to accrue this number of hours annually.

Years in Service Annual Hours
0-4 80
5-9 120
10 128
11 136
12 144
13 152
14 or greater 160
Some employees are entitled to earn an additional forty (40) hours of vacation each year.

This additional annual vacation accrual shall be provided to employees in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules.

Employees shall accrue vacation beginning the first year of employment. Employees are not allowed to accumulate more than two hundred-eighty (280) hours of vacation. Once an employee accumulates two hundred-eighty (280) hours of vacation, the employee shall stop accruing vacation. Accrual shall not begin again until the vacation leave is less than two hundred-eighty (280) hours.

Paragraph 2: Sell Back of Accumulated Vacation. The City allows for sell back of accumulated vacation based upon the approved annual operating budget. The City Manager will have the final authority to review, modify, and approve all requests. A qualified employee may request a sell back of accumulated vacation during two months of the year, June, and December. In order to qualify for the sell back, an employee must:

A. Have at least eighty (80) hours of accumulated vacation remaining after the sell back is completed, and
42 5
3 7
6 3
B. Have taken at least forty (40) hours of vacation/management leave, of which at least twenty-six (26) vacation/management leave hours must be consecutive, within the last twelve (12) months preceding the sell back.

If the employee is qualified and desires the sell back, the employee must follow any additional procedures established by the Personnel Officer.

8.2 MANAGEMENT LEAVE
Management leave may be made available in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules.

The accrual of this leave is in a lump-sum in January of each year. New employees, who are eligible for this leave, shall accrue on the first of the month following the date of employment. However, the amount accrued in the first year of employment shall be on a prorated basis. Management leave received pursuant to this Section shall be either taken as time off with pay or will be paid off in a pay period in January.

8.3 HOLIDAYS
Employees shall have the following holidays as time off with pay:

New Year’s Day (January 1)
Martin Luther King Day (3rd Monday in January)
President’s Birthday (3rd Monday in February)
Memorial Day (last Monday in May)
Independence Day (July 4)
Labor Day (1st Monday in September)
Veteran’s Day (November 11)
Thanksgiving Day (4th Thursday in November)
Friday after Thanksgiving
Christmas Day (December 25)
In the event that a holiday occurs on a regular day-off and is not observed on a preceding or following day by the City, each employee who is employed prior to the holiday shall receive eight (8) hours of floating holiday. Floating holiday hours may be used hour by hour or in the full eight (8) hour increment. Floating holiday hours must be used within the same calendar year they are received and will not carry over to future years.

8.4 SICK LEAVE
Paragraph 1: Sick Leave Generally. The granting of sick leave shall be determined by the following rules:
43 5
3 7
6 3
A. Accrual of Sick Leave: Sick leave, in the forms described below, may be made available in accordance with the benefits matrix contained in Exhibit A to these Personnel Rules:

Full-time employees shall accrue sick leave with pay at a rate of eight (8) hours per month. Any such leave accrued but unused in any year shall be credited to the following year. At separation, the City will compensate the employee leaving City service for one-half of accumulated sick leave, for separation reasons other than discharge/termination or job abandonment as defined in Chapter 5.

In accordance with the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014 (“HWHFA”), part-time employees who, on or after July 1, 2015, work in California for 30 or more days within a year from the beginning of employment are entitled to paid sick leave. Part-time employees shall accrue sick leave with pay at a rate of one hour per every 30 hours worked, beginning at the commencement of employment. The accrual of paid sick days cannot exceed 80 hours or 10 days. Accrued and unused paid sick days shall carry over year to year based on the original hire date. A part-time employee shall be entitled to use accrued paid sick leave beginning on the 90th day of employment, after which the employee may use paid sick leave as it accrues. At separation the City will compensate part-time employee leaving City service for one-half of accumulated sick leave, for separation reasons other than discharge/termination or job as defined in Chapter 5.

B. Permitted Uses of Sick Leave: An employee eligible for sick leave with pay shall be granted such leave for the following reasons:

A. Personal illness or physical incapacity.

B. Enforced quarantine of the employee in accordance with community health regulations.

C. Doctor and dental appointments.

D. Bereavement and Reproductive Loss.

E. For an employee or their child family member who is an victim individual against whom a qualifying act of violence is committed. of domestic abuse, sexual assault, or stalking for specified purposes.A qualifying act of violence is defined as any of the following, regardless of whether it results in an arrest, prosecution, or convection:
44 5
3 7
6 3
(a) Domestic violence
(b) Sexual assault
(c) Stalking
(d) An act, conduct or pattern of conduct that includes any of the following: (1) an individual causing bodily injury or death to another individual; (20 an individual exhibiting, drawing, brandishing, or using a firearm, or other dangerous weapon, with respect to another individual; or (3) an individual using or making a threat, whether actual or perceived, to use, force against another individual to cause physical injury or death. (1)
E.F. Absence from duty because the employee’s presence is needed to attend to diagnosis, care, or treatment of an existing health condition of, or preventative care for, an employee’s family member. “Family member” means any of the following:
(a) A child, meaning a biological, adopted, foster child, stepchild, child of a domestic partner, legal ward, or a child to whom the employee stands in loco parentis.

This definition of child is applicable regardless of age or dependency status.
(b) A biological, adoptive, foster parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of an employee or the employee’s
spouse or registered domestic partner, or a person who
stood in loco parentis when the employee was a minor
child.
(c) A designated person is defined as “any individual
related by blood or whose association with the
employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.
(d) A spouse.
(e) A registered domestic partner.
(f) A grandparent.
(g) A grandchild.
45 5
3 7
6 3
(h) A sibling
Full-time employees may use accrued sick leave up to the amount earned during six months of employment each calendar year (48 hours) for purposes other than their own illness or medical/dental care. Part-time employees may use accrued sick leave up to 48 hours each calendar year.

C. Conditions on Use of Sick Leave: Sick leave is not a right which an employee may use at his or her discretion. Sick leave is subject to the following:

Observed holidays occurring during the sick leave will not be counted as sick leave.

An employee must call no later than thirty (30) minutes after the regular starting time of their assigned shift and report to their supervisor. An employee has an obligation to keep their supervisor informed regarding their condition and whereabouts during working hours.

Except in extraordinary circumstances, failure to call before the thirty (30) minute time limit is a basis for denying use of sick leave.

An employee who misses work shall, upon return to work, ensure the sick leave request is input into the City’s leave system.

An employee who misses five days or more of work shall, upon return to work, furnish a certificate issued by a medical provider indicating the employee was on medical leave.

In cases of suspected abuse of sick leave, a supervisor may require a doctor’s statement for any illness. Failure to validate an absence with a doctor’s statement may be grounds for denying use of sick leave.

Continued abuse will be cause for discipline.

Paragraph 2: Sick Leave Sell Back. The City allows for sell back of accumulated sick leave based upon the approved annual operating budget. The City Manager will have the final authority to review, modify, and approve all requests. A qualified employee may request a sell back of accumulated sick leave in December. In order to qualify for the sell back, an employee must:
46 5
3 7
6 3
A. Employees who have accumulated more than 360 hours of sick leave may sell all or part of those hours in excess of 360 back to the City at the rate of one hour of pay for each two hours sick leave. If the employee is qualified and desires the sell back, the employee must follow any additional procedures established by the Personnel Officer.

Paragraph 3: Sick Leave Donation Policy.

A. Purpose: The purpose of this Policy is to establish a program and procedures for employees to donate a portion of their accumulated sick leave time to fellow employees who have exhausted their paid leave entitlements and (1) who are suffering from a catastrophic illness or injury or (2) whose absence from duty is caused by the need to attend to the catastrophic illness or injury of their child, spouse, parent, or domestic partner.

B. Background: The City’s employees accrue paid sick leave and other various forms of paid leave for their use when the employees are absent from work.

There have been occasions when a City employee, due to a serious health condition, has exhausted all forms of paid time off. Such employees have been forced to go without compensation for a length of time. This Policy is designed to address such circumstances during that medical and financial emergency.

C. Policy: This Policy allows City employees to provide assistance to a fellow employee who is facing a crisis due to their own or a family member’s catastrophic illness or injury. A catastrophic illness or injury is one that is expected to incapacitate a person for an extended period of time and that creates a financial hardship because the employee has exhausted all of his or her accumulated leave. Participation by donors or recipients in the Sick Leave Donation Program is entirely voluntary.

D. Catastrophic Leave Donation Banks: The Sick Leave Donation Program will allow an employee, who is absent from work due to his or her own serious health condition or due to the need to attend to the serious health condition of their child, spouse, parent, or domestic partner to request that a Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank be established on his or her behalf. A Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank shall not be established unless the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee has approved the employee’s request. Leave donations will be credited to a particular recipient’s Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank and will be for use by that designated recipient only.
47 5
3 7
6 3
E. Eligibility of Employee for Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank. To be eligible to receive Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank donations, an employee must meet all the following conditions:
(a) Must be eligible for the accrual of sick leave in
accordance with Personnel
Rule Section 8.4; and,
(b) Must have been employed by the City in a regular
position for at least one year or if good cause can be
demonstrated, the City Manager can waive the one
year requirement; and,
(c) Must submit a confidential statement from his or her treating physician which indicates that the employee’s
absence is due to the employee’s own “serious health
condition” or is due to the need to attend to the
“serious health condition” of their child, spouse, or
parent, or domestic partner as defined according to state and federal laws. The statement must also estimate the duration of the employee’s absence from work; and,
(d) Must have applied for short-term disability insurance or for Workers’ Compensation benefits, if eligible, and
have authorized the City to integrate any such awarded
benefits with available leave balances; and,
(e) Must have exhausted all earned leave balances
(including sick, vacation, management leave, and
compensatory time). However, the City Manager may
approve the solicitation and acceptance of sick leave
donations prior to all balances being exhausted when
the physician’s statement and existing leave balances
indicate that all such balances will be exhausted within the next two pay periods.

F. Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank Guidelines. Leave donations will be credited to a recipient’s Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank on an hour-for-hour basis, regardless of the hourly pay rate of any particular employee. While using leave from the recipient’s Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank, the recipient will be treated as though he or she was merely using the recipient’s own sick leave. Thus, the recipient will accrue additional annual vacation or sick leave, as usual, during the use of hours 48 5
3 7
6 3
from the Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank. The maximum amount of sick leave which may be donated, in total, by City employees to a particular Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank is a total of four hundred eighty (480) hours. Any hours of donated sick leave remaining in the Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank at the time the Bank is abolished will be forfeited. The donated hours used by the recipient are taxable to him or her in accordance with Internal Revenue Service regulations and are subject to withholdings as required by law.

G. Leave Donations: Donations of sick leave are subject to the following requirements:

Full-Time Employees Only. Only full-time employees, who are eligible for the accrual of sick leave in accordance with Personnel Rule Section 8.4, Sub-paragraph 1.A, may make sick leave donations to a Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank.

Type of Donations. Employees may donate from his or her accumulated sick leave balance only. Transitional sick leave balances are not available for donation.

Minimum Donations. Employees wanting to donate will be notified of the hours needed per pay period. Employees may donate a minimum of one hour from his or her accumulated sick leave balance. No donation from an employee will be permitted that would result in the donor’s accumulated sick leave balance, immediately after the donation, being below eighty (80) hours of accumulated sick leave.

Whole Hour Donations. Leave donations must be in whole hours. No fractions of hours may be donated.

Donation's Impact on Sick Leave Sell-Back. Sick leave donations may affect the donor’s ability to annually sell sick leave back to the City.

H. Responsibilities Under the Policy: The development and use of a Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank carries with it a shared responsibility between City's management and individual employees desiring to participate in the program. The respective responsibilities are set forth below:

The Requesting Employee: The requesting employee will prepare and submit to the Personnel Office a “Request to Establish a Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank” form. Additionally, the requesting employee should submit 49 5
3 7
6 3
a “Certification of Physician or Practitioner” form to the Personnel Office in a sealed envelope labeled “Confidential – Request to Establish a Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank.” If the requesting employee is unable to make the request on their own behalf, the employee’s Department Director may submit a request on the employee’s behalf.

The Program Administrator: The City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, will serve as the administrator of the Sick Leave Donation Program. The Administrator will receive the confidential statement from the requestor’s physician in a manner consistent with federal and state laws. The Administrator will approve or deny the establishment of a requested Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank. If the request is approved, the Bank shall be established, and the Administrator will publicize the request with the statement approved by the requestor. The Administrator shall approve or deny each offered donation, if any, to the Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank in accordance with the requirements of this Policy. The Administrator shall determine when the Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank shall be abolished.

The Donating Employee: A donating employee will prepare and submit to the Personnel Office a “Request to Donate to Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank” form.

The Finance Department: The Finance Department will make the appropriate payroll and leave balance adjustments for both the recipient and any donors. The Finance Department will coordinate the usage of hours from the Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank and the integration of any other benefits therewith, if applicable. Any hours remaining in the Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank at the time it is abolished will be forfeited.

Forms: The forms utilized in the Sick Leave Donation Program are attached as follows:
Request to Establish a Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank Request to Donate to Catastrophic Leave Donation Bank
The Sick Leave Donation Program forms are available from the intranet or Human Resources.
50 5
3 7
6 3

8.5 FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE POLICY
Family and Medical Leave shall be provided in accordance with state and federal law and the Lake Forest Family and Medical Leave Policy.

8.6 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
Full-time employees are eligible for a maximum of three (3) days per calendar year paid bereavement leave in the event of the death of a member of the employee’s immediate family. Should additional time be required due to travel, an additional two (2) days may be approved by the City Manager.

For the purpose of this Section, immediate family is limited to a parent, stepparent, spouse, domestic partner, child, stepchild, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandfather, grandmother, grandchild, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, aunt, or uncle of the employee, regardless of residence.

An employee is eligible for bereavement leave once they have been employed for at least 30 days prior to the commencement of leave. The employee can use bereavement leave for each qualifying occurrence, but full-time employees are only eligible for three (3) days per calendar year paid bereavement leave. Employees may use accrued leave for an additional bereavement leave beyond the three days.

The five days of bereavement leave do not need to be taken consecutively; and can be intermittent. The employee must complete the bereavement leave within three months of the family member’s date of death. Part-time employees are not eligible for City paid bereavement leave.

In accordance with state law, employees are eligible for unpaid leave of up to five (5) working days in the event of the death of an employee’s family member (spouse, child, registered domestic partner, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, and parents-in-law).

The City will provide unpaid leave in accordance with state law, which will run concurrently with any leave entitlement under City policy. To be eligible, an employee must have been employed for at least 30 days before taking leave. For any leave permitted under state law which is beyond City paid leave, employee may use sick leave, compensatory time off, or vacation time for bereavement leave. This leave must be used within three months of the death of a family member.
51 5
3 7
6 3

8.7 REPRODUCTIVE LOSS LEAVE
Eligible employees may take leave for up to five (5) days of unpaid leave when they suffer a reproduction loss event. A “reproduction loss event” is defined as the day or the final day for a multiple day event, of one of the following:
(a) Failed adoption
(b) Failed surrogacy
(c) Miscarriage
(d) Stillbirth
(e) Unsuccessful assisted reproduction
The employee will be eligible to take reproductive loss leave if they have been employed by the City for at least thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of their leave and have experienced a reproductive loss event. Employees may use vacation and sick leave that is otherwise available to employee.

The employee is not required to take all five (5) days of reproductive loss leave consecutively; employees are required to complete reproductive loss leave within three (3) months of the date of their reproductive loss event.

If an employee experiences more than one reproductive loss event within a 12-month period, the City is only required to grant the employee a maximum of 20 days of reproductive loss leave within a 12-month period.

8.8 MILITARY LEAVE
Military leave shall be granted in accordance with state and federal law, including the California Military and Veterans Code and the provisions of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) and the City of Lake Forest Military Leave Policy. All employees entitled to military leave shall give the appointing authority an opportunity within the limits of military regulations to determine when such leave shall be taken.

8.9 LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY
A. Department Directors may grant employees leave of absence without pay for not more than five (5) business days. Such leave shall be reported to the Personnel Officer.

B. The City Manager may grant employees leave of absence without pay or seniority, not to exceed three (3) months. After three (3) months, the leave of absence may be extended, if authorized by the City Council. No such 52 5
3 7
6 3
leave shall be granted except upon written request of the employee, setting forth the reason for the request, and such approval shall be made in writing.

Upon expiration of a regularly approved leave or within a reasonable period of time after notice to return to duty, the employee shall be reinstated in the position held at the time leave was granted. Failure on the part of an employee to return to duty within five business days after notice to return shall be considered an absence without leave and be cause for immediate termination, and such employee automatically waives all rights under the Personnel Ordinance and these Personnel Rules. Deposit in the United States mail of a first-class letter, postage paid, addressed to the employee’s last known place of residence, shall be reasonable notice.

C. Employees placed on an unpaid status will not accrue sick or vacation leave.

An employee will be eligible for an unpaid status after exhausting all accrued paid vacation, management leave, compensatory leave, and sick leave balances.

8.10 SCHOOL ACTIVITY LEAVE
Employees are entitled to up to 40 hours of unpaid leave per year to attend or otherwise be involved with their child’s school or day care facility, upon reasonable advance notice.

This includes:
(a) To find, enroll or reenroll his or her child in a school or with a licensed childcare provider, or to participate in activities of the school or childcare provider, limited to 8 hours per month; or
(b) To address a school emergency or childcare provider emergency (including a situation where a child cannot stay at school or with a childcare provider due to behavioral or discipline problems); or
(c) To appear at their child’s school after the child has been suspended.

If possible, the employee should give reasonable written notice to his/her supervisor of his/her intent to do so. The written notice must include the date and time of the visit, as well as the child whose school the employee will be visiting. The City may deny the request if it will result in undue disruption to City operations.

The employee may take off up to a maximum of 40 hours per school year, but not more than 8 hours in one month, per child. The employee may utilize existing vacation, compensatory time, or management leave, if applicable, for purposes of this planned absence.
53 5
3 7
6 3
The employee’s supervisor may require the employee to provide written documentation from the school as proof of these visits.

8.11 JURY DUTY LEAVE
All employees required to serve as a juror shall be compensated for the difference between their normal wage and the compensation for jury duty, less travel pay, during the period of such service.

8.12 ADMINISTRATION OF LEAVE
Employees shall attend their work location in accordance with these Personnel Rules regarding hours of work, holidays, and leaves. All departments shall keep attendance records of employees which shall be reported to the Personnel Officer when and in the manner the Personnel Officer specifies. Failure on the part of an employee to return to duty within five business days after notice to return shall be considered an absence without leave and be cause for immediate termination, and such employee automatically waives all rights under the Personnel Ordinance and these Personnel Rules. Deposit in the United States mail of a first-class letter, postage paid, addressed to the employee’s last known place of residence, shall be reasonable notice.
54 5
3 7
6 3
CHAPTER 9

MISCELLANEOUS

9.1 NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY
No employee shall be promoted, demoted, terminated, or in any way favored or discriminated against because of political opinions or affiliations, genetic characteristics or information, race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, creed, sex, gender identity, gender expression, gender (including pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding or related medical conditions), physical or mental disability, medical condition, marital status, military or veteran status, sexual orientation, age (40 or over), reproductive health decision making, because of the exercise of his/her rights under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, or any basis protected by applicable federal, state, or local law.

9.2 POLITICAL ACTIVITY
The political activities of City employees shall conform to the pertinent provision of the Ethics in Government Act of 1990; Section 89500 et seq. of Title 9, Chapter 9.5 of the Government Code. Also, employees shall conform to the limits on the expenditure of City funds for political activities in accordance with Section 54964 of Title 5, Chapter 9.5 of the Government Code.

9.3 POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Employees may not solicit political funds or contributions from other employees during working hours or on City property, nor may employees participate in political activities while in any uniform which would represent the City, while on City property or during working hours. Employees are prohibited from soliciting political contributions from other City employees or applicants on an employment list unless the solicitation is made as part of a request to a significant segment of the public. Also, candidates for City office may not use or threaten to use political authority or influence over City employees and City employees will not have any adverse job actions taken as a result of failing to contribute to a political campaign or engage in political activities. The purpose of these restrictions is clearly to keep the City employee’s job free from political influence.

9.4 RIGHT TO CONTRACT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES
The City Manager shall consider and make recommendations to the City Council regarding the extent the City should contract for the performance of technical services in connection with the establishment or operation of the personnel system. The City Council may contract with any qualified entity to perform any or all of the responsibilities and duties imposed by the Personnel Ordinance, including, but not limited to the following:
55 5
3 7
6 3
A. The preparation of Personnel Rules and its subsequent revisions and amendments.

B. The preparation of a position Classification/Compensation Plan and its subsequent revisions and amendments.

C. The preparation, conduct, and grading of competitive tests.

D. The conduct of employee training programs.

E. Special and technical services of advisory or informational character on matters relating to personnel administration.

9.5 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of these Personnel Rules is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of these Personnel Rules.

9.6 CONFIDENTIAL POSITIONS
As provided for in Government Code Section 3507.5 (the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act), the City has designated the following positions as confidential: City Manager and Department Directors, and any other employees who have access to confidential employee relations information or who have responsibilities within the employee relations function. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to make further designations of confidential positions by preparing a memorandum stating the same. A copy of this memorandum shall be sent to those employees impacted by such designation.

9.7 ADDITIONAL POLICIES
In addition to the rules and policies set forth in these Personnel Rules, the following additional rules and policies are on file with Human Resources:

Paragraph 1: Family and Medical Leave Policy.

Paragraph 2: Disability Discrimination Policy.

Paragraph 3: Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation Policy.

Paragraph 4: Drug and Alcohol-Free Workplace Policy.

Paragraph 5: Conflict of Interest Code.
56 5
3 7
6 3
Paragraph 6: Computer and Telecommunications Equipment Use Policy.

Paragraph 7: Electronic Communication Usage and Retention Policy.

Paragraph 8: Workplace Violence Prevention Plan.

Paragraph 9: Military Leave Policy.

9.8 DEFINITION OF TERMS
ALLOCATION: The assignment of a single position to its proper class in accordance with the duties performed and the authority and responsibilities exercised.

APPOINTING AUTHORITY: The City Council shall appoint the City Manager and City Attorney. The City Manager shall appoint all other positions within the City administration which are exempt from the “competitive service.” AT-WILL: An employee who can be terminated at any time with or without cause and without notice.

CLASS: All positions sufficiently similar in duties, authority, and responsibility to permit grouping under a common title in the application with equity of common standards of selection, transfer, promotion, and salary.

COMPARABLE CLASS: Refers to jobs in classes which require equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.

COMPETITIVE SERVICE: All positions of employment in the service of the City except those specifically excluded by the Lake Forest Municipal Code and these Personnel Rules.

DAYS: Means calendar days, unless otherwise stated.

DEMOTION: The movement of an employee from one class to another class having a lower maximum rate of pay.

DOMESTIC PARTNER: Individuals registered as domestic partners with the Secretary of State of California pursuant to the California Family Code.

ELIGIBLE: A person whose name is on an employment list. 57 5
3 7
6 3
EMPLOYMENT LIST:

Open-Employment List: A list of names of persons who have qualified for appointment to a class in the competitive service.

Promotional-Employment List: A list of names of persons who have qualified for promotion to a class in the competitive service.

Reemployment List: A list of names of probationary and regular employees who have been laid off or demoted in lieu of lay off.

EXAMINATION:

Open Competitive Examination: An examination for a particular class that is open to all persons meeting the qualifications for the class.

Promotional Examination: An examination for a particular class which is open only to employees meeting the qualifications for the class who, with no subsequent break in City service except for approved leave of absence, are classified as part- time or full-time regular employees, or six (6) months of probationary status.

FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE: Is an employee who is regularly scheduled to work no less that forty (40) hours per work week.

FULL-TIME REGULAR EMPLOYEE: Is an employee hired for an indefinite term into a budgeted position, who is regularly scheduled to work no less than forty (40) hours per work week, has successfully completed the probationary period, and has been retained by the City.

MANAGEMENT LEAVE: Is paid leave granted by Section 8.2 of these Personnel Rules designed to recognize the hours worked beyond the normal work week by an employee .

PART-TIME EMPLOYEE: An employee who is hired into a position for less than forty (40) hours per week.

PERSONNEL OFFICER: The City Manager or the individual designated by the City Manager to administer the personnel system.

PERSONNEL ORDINANCE: Lake Forest Municipal Code Chapter that creates a personnel system for the City.

POSITION: A group of duties and responsibilities in the competitive service requiring full-time or part-time employment of one (1) person.
58 5
3 7
6 3
PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE: An employee who has been appointed to a position, who is currently in the working test period where the employee is required to demonstrate the fitness for the position to which he/she is appointed by actual performance of the duties of the position.

PROBATIONARY PERIOD: A working test period during which an employee is required to demonstrate the fitness for the position to which he/she is appointed by actual performance of the duties of the position.

PROMOTION: The movement of an employee from one class to another classification having a higher maximum rate of pay.

PROVISIONAL EMPLOYEE: A temporary appointed employee who possesses the minimum training and experience qualifications for a particular position and appointed to a vacant position in the absence of available eligible individuals from an employment list or during a temporary vacancy due to another employee’s leave of absence.

REGULAR EMPLOYEE: An employee who has successfully completed his/her probationary period and has been retained as provided in these Personnel Rules.

REINSTATEMENT: The employment without examination of a former regular employee or probationary employee.

SALARY: The amount of compensation provided to an employee in the classified service, within a maximum and minimum range of pay that corresponds to the classification of the position held by that employee and is based upon the classification plan and compensation schedule, adopted by the City Council.

SUSPENSION WITHOUT PAY: The temporary separation from the service of any employee, without pay, for disciplinary purposes.

TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE: An employee who is hired into any classification to meet a short-term need of the City. A temporary employee is employed at-will, does not receive most City provided benefits (except CalPERS benefits if determined to be required by law) and shall be hired for a specified term, not to exceed six (6) months and/or 980 hours per year, with the express written approval of the City Manager.

TRANSFER: A change of an employee from one position to another position in the same classification or in a comparable class with the same maximum rate of pay.

WAGE: The amount of compensation provided to a part-time, temporary, or seasonal employee, as an hourly rate of pay that corresponds to the position held by that employee 59 5
3 7
6 3
as set forth in the Classification Plan and Compensation Schedule, adopted by the City Council.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................1

1.1 PERSONNEL SYSTEM .................................................................... 1

1.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................................. 1

1.3 COMPETITIVE SERVICE................................................................ 2

1.4 APPLICABILITY OF RULES TO CERTAIN POSITIONS
EXCLUDED FROM COMPETITIVE SERVICE .............................3

1.5 PERSONNEL OFFICER.................................................................... 3

1.6 PERSONNEL REPORTS AND FILES ............................................. 4 CHAPTER 2 RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, APPOINTMENT, AND
PROBATION .....................................................................................5

2.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING APPOINTMENTS ......... 5

2.2 APPLICATIONS AND APPLICANTS............................................. 5

2.3 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS.................... 6

2.4 EXAMINATIONS.............................................................................. 6

2.5 EMPLOYMENT LISTS…………………………………………….7

2.6 METHOD OF FILLING VACANCIES............................................ 8

2.7 PROBATIONARY PERIOD ............................................................. 9

2.8 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION .............................................. 11

2.9 TRANSFER, PROMOTION, AND REINSTATEMENT ............... 11 CHAPTER 3 DISCIPLINE .....................................................................................13

3.1 STANDARD FOR DISCIPLINE..................................................... 13

3.2 RANGE OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION ......................................... 13

3.3 PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE......................................................... 13

3.4 IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINE ...................................................... 15

3.5 PLACEMENT IN PERSONNEL FILE ........................................... 17

3.6 EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................ 17

3.7 ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE.......................................................... 17

3.8 EMERGENCY SUSPENSION ........................................................ 18

3.9 TIME EXTENSIONS....................................................................... 18

3.10 DELIVERY OF NOTICE ................................................................ 18

3.11 RIGHT OF APPEAL........................................................................ 18

3.12 RULES ON APPEAL TO THE CITY MANAGER ........................ 19 CHAPTER 4 COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE .........................21

4.1 PURPOSE OF COMPLAINT AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 21

4.2 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................. 21

4.3 COMPLAINT PROCEDURE .......................................................... 21

4.4 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE .......................................................... 22

4.5 GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................... 23 CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION FROM SERVICE ....................................................24

5.1 DISCHARGE/TERMINATION ...................................................... 24

5.2 LAY OFF.......................................................................................... 24

5.3 RESIGNATION ............................................................................... 24

5.4 JOB ABANDONMENT................................................................... 25

5.5 RETIREMENT ............................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 6 COMPENSATION AND HOURS ...................................................26

6.1 CLASSIFICATION POLICY .......................................................... 26

6.2 FULL-TIME SALARY ADMINISTRATION POLICIES.............. 27

6.3 PART-TIME WAGE ADMINISTRATION POLICIES.................. 27

6.4 PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN................................. 28

6.5 WORKING HOURS .................................................................... 3031

6.6 PAY PERIODS AND PAY DAYS .................................................. 31

6.7 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ............................................................. 31

6.8 COMPENSATION FOR OVERTIME ............................................ 32

6.9 PAY FOR SERVING IN HIGHER JOB CLASSIFICATION ........ 33 CHAPTER 7 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS..................................................................35

7.1 HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE ............................................... 35

7.2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM . .................... 36

7.3 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION ALLOWANCE............................... 36

7.4 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE........................................................ 37

7.5 WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ..................................................... 37

7.6 DEFERRED COMPENSATION ..................................................... 37

7.7 TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES . ..................................................... 37

7.8 EXPENSE ALLOWANCES ............................................................ 38

7.9 LONG-TERM DISABILITY ........................................................... 39

7.10 SHORT-TERM DISABILITY ......................................................... 39

7.11 CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND MEMBERSHIPS................ 40

7.12 INSURANCE/BENEFIT PLANS .................................................... 40 CHAPTER 8 LEAVE..............................................................................................41

8.1 VACATION LEAVE ....................................................................... 41

8.2 MANAGEMENT LEAVE ............................................................... 42

8.3 HOLIDAYS...................................................................................... 42

8.4 SICK LEAVE ................................................................................... 42

8.5 FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE POLICY ............................ 5049

8.6 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE .............................................................. 50

8.7 REPRODUCTIVE LOSS LEAVE................................................... 50

8.8 MILITARY LEAVE......................................................................... 51

8.9 LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY ....................................... 52

8.10 SCHOOL ACTIVITY LEAVE ........................................................ 52

8.11 JURY DUTY LEAVE .................................................................. 5352

8.12 ADMINISTRATION OF LEAVE ...................................................53 CHAPTER 9 MISCELLANEOUS..........................................................................54

9.1 NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY ............................................... 54

9.2 POLITICAL ACTIVITY.................................................................. 54

9.3 POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES................. 54

9.4 RIGHT TO CONTRACT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES ................... 54

9.5 SEVERABILITY.............................................................................. 55

9.6 CONFIDENTIAL POSITIONS ....................................................... 55

9.7 ADDITIONAL POLICIES............................................................... 55 Paragraph 1: Family and Medical Leave Policy.............................55 Paragraph 2: Disability Discrimination Policy...............................55 Paragraph 3: Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation Policy.55 Paragraph 4: Drug and Alcohol-Free Workplace Policy................55 Paragraph 5: Conflict of Interest Code. ..........................................55 Paragraph 6: Computer and Telecommunications Equipment Use Policy.........................................................................56 Paragraph 7: Electronic Communication Usage and Retention Policy.........................................................................56 Paragraph 8: Workplace Violence Prevention Plan Policy. ...........56 Paragraph 9: Military Leave Policy................................................56

9.8 DEFINITION OF TERMS ............................................................... 56 EXHIBIT A -- Benefits Matrix ....................................................................A-1 Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Benefits Matrix
Effective January 1, 2025
1 Category Car
Allowance
Life
Insurance
Additional
Vacation
Administrative
Leave (Hours)
Cell
Phone1
City's 2025 Health Contribution
(monthly)
City's 2025 Dental
Contribution
(monthly)
City's 2025 Vision
Contribution
(monthly)
A
$400/month
or City
vehicle per
City
discretion
1 x Annual
Salary 40 hours 40
$100
ACM
$80 DH
B
$250/month
or City
vehicle per
City
discretion
1 x Annual
Salary or
75,0002
(max)
No 24
$80
ATCM
$30
MGR
C No $75,000 No 16 No
D No $75,000 No No No
Employee Only:
90% of the highest HMO plan
offered.

Employee + 1:
90% of the highest HMO plan
offered.

Family:
90% of the highest HMO plan
offered.

Full-time employees who provide
proof of enrollment in a group
medical plan may receive a cash in
lieu benefit of $450 per month as
taxable income.

Employee Only:
$53.50 $51.60
Employee + 1:
$108.50 $104.70
Family:
$163.90 $158.20
Employee Only:
$16.50
Employee + 1:
$23.20
Family:
$40.10

A B C D
Assistant City Manager Accounting Manager Accounting Supervisor Accountant City Clerk Administrative Services Manager Associate Planner Accounting Technician Deputy City Manager Assistant Director of Community Development Code Enforcement Supervisor Administrative Specialist Director of Community
Services Assistant Director of Finance Communications & Marketing Analyst Assistant City Clerk
Director of Community
Development Assistant to the City Manager Communications & Marketing Specialist Assistant Planner
Director of Economic
Development Communications & Marketing Manager Environmental Compliance Inspector Audio Visual Technician
Director of Management
Services Economic Development Manager Executive Assistant Building Permit Technician Director of Finance Economic Development/Housing Manager Facilities Supervisor Code Enforcement Officer Exhibit A
Benefits Matrix
Effective January 1, 2025
2 A B C D
Director of Public
Works/City Engineer Engineering Services Manager/Assistant City Engineer Finance Analyst Community Outreach Specialist Environmental Manager GIS/Applications Analyst Community Preservation Technician Facilities Manager Information Technology Analyst Engineering Aide Housing Manager Information Technology Specialist Engineering Technician Human Resources Manager Landscape Administrator Facilities Maintenance Specialist Information Technology Manager Management Analyst GIS/Applications Technician Planning Manager Management Assistant Human Resources Technician Public Safety Manager Principal Civil Engineer Management Aide Public Works Maintenance Manager Principal Planner Office Specialist Recreation Manager Public Works Supervisor Permit Technician Traffic Engineer Manager Recreation Supervisor Planning Aide Senior Accountant Receptionist/Cashier
Senior Communications &
Marketing Analyst Records Coordinator
Senior Communications &
Marketing Specialist Records Specialist
Senior Financial Analyst Senior Accounting Technician
Senior Landscape Administrator Senior Audio-Visual Technician Senior Management Analyst Senior Building Permit Technician Senior Planner *2 Senior Code Enforcement Officer
Senior Recreations Supervisor Senior Office Specialist
Street Maintenance Administrator Senior Permit Technician 1 May receive cell phone allowance or City paid cell phone but not both. 2 Grandfathered as of 08/22/2012. Positions filled prior to 08/22/2012 will receive the benefits of Category B, positions filled on or after 08/22/2012 will receive the benefits of Category C.

ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT OF THE PERSONNEL RULES AND

REGULATIONS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City has adopted and amended, from time to time, the Personnel Rules and Regulations in accordance with Municipal Code Sections

2.60.030 and 2.60.050; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to make changes to the Personnel Rules and Regulations to ensure compliance with new laws and to conform to current practices; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE

FOREST, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves the amendments to the Personnel Rules and Regulations, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and directs the Personnel Officer to have those changes incorporated into the Personnel Rules and Regulations and disseminated to all employees affected by the changes.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _____, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:
_____________________

MARK TETTEMER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________

MATTHEW RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.__ was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the ___ day of _____, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT
A
NOTE: A clean version of the Personnel Rules and Regulations will be attached if approved by the City Council. Please see Attachment 2 for a red- lined (underline/strike-out) version of the Personnel Rules and Regulations.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR NON-ARTERIAL STREETS, ZONE A (PW 2022-05A) AND LAKE FOREST SPORTS PARK PARKING LOT (24P15)

SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Find that American Asphalt South, Inc. has completed construction of Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A (PW 2022-05A) and Lake Forest Sports Park Parking Lot Slurry Seal (24P15).

2. Approve the Notice of Completion and authorize the Mayor to execute the document on behalf of the City.

3. Authorize City Clerk to submit Notice of Completion for recordation to the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County within fifteen days of the City Council approval, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code.

4. Authorize staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On October 17, 2023, the City Council awarded a contract to American Asphalt South, Inc. (“AAS”) in the amount of $1,401,467.50 to provide pavement repairs and slurry seal in Zone A and Lake Forest Sports Park Parking Lot. This project repaired pavement and slurry sealed the residential and commercial areas in Zone A as well as Sports Park Parking Lots. Additionally, it replaced all the existing traffic striping, markings, and legends within the project area. The Project advances the City’s goal of maintaining a “Good” (75 point or more) rating as determined by the biennial Pavement Condition Index (“PCI”) analysis.

The Project began on January 8, 2024. The City Manager authorized Contract Change Order #1 (“CCO #1”) and Contract Change Order #2 (”CCO #2”), which in combination resulted in a credit of $227,874.35 to the construction contract with AAS. The total construction cost, including the two contract change orders, is $1,173,593.15. After completing the final inspection of the Project, addressing

punch list items, determining final quantities, and processing progress payments, the Project is now ready for the Notice of Completion. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Notice of Completion (Attachment 1) and direct staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law. Sufficient funding exists in the 2023-30 Capital Improvement Projects Budget for the two projects, Street Resurfacing and Slurry Seal Improvement Project and Sports Park Parking Lot Slurry Seal Project to cover the costs of the recommended action.

BACKGROUND:

The City has an established annual street maintenance program to slurry seal and asphalt overlay public streets. As a requirement of OCTA’s Measure M funding, the City utilizes a pavement management system to evaluate and score the condition of each street biennially utilizing a PCI. The pavement management system provides recommendations to maintain the street’s condition based on the PCI rating. The PCI for the entire City is 77, or “Good” on a scale of 0-100, with 100 being a new street.

Typically, the City performs slurry seal applications in seven-year intervals and resurfaces streets on an as-needed basis with available funding. As part of the slurry seal program, staff also identified locations on the streets within zones that require structural repairs in addition to the slurry seal. The contractor would perform these localized repairs before applying the slurry seal. This cost-saving management practice reduces expensive reconstruction costs by extending the useful life of the pavement without the need for full resurfacing of the asphalt.

The Fiscal Year 2022-23 slurry seal project for non-arterial streets was identified as Zone A.

On October 17, 2023, the City Council awarded a contract to American Asphalt South, Inc. (“AAS”) in the amount of $1,401,467.50 for the Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A and Sports Park Parking Lot Slurry Seal.

The Project began on January 8, 2024. The City Manager authorized Contract Change Orders CCO #1 and CCO #2, which in combination resulted in a credit of $227,874.35 to the construction contract with AAS. These Change Orders provided compensation and credit for the reduction and addition of work related to final quantity adjustments based on field conditions.

The credits for quantity reductions included needing a lower number of manholes adjusted to grade, lower number of removal and replacement of water valves, and lower quantities of Slurry Type 1. Additionally, no reinstalment of traffic loops and monument preservation services were needed, resulting in savings of the total amount for these line items. The extra work performed included 350 square feet of additional 4-inch cold mill and asphalt paving, and one additional removal and replacement of a survey monument within Zone A.

DISCUSSION:

AAS substantially completed construction activities in Spring 2024. The City’s construction manager conducted a final inspection to ensure the Project’s completion per the contract requirements. Punch list items were addressed, and the final quantities were documented through two Change Orders. The Project is now ready for the Notice of Completion (Attachment).

The Notice of Completion establishes a date that limits the time subcontractors and material vendors may file stop notices or liens against the project. Following City Council approval, the City Clerk must submit the Notice of Completion to the Clerk Recorder of Orange County within 15 days of the City Council’s action, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code. Following approval and recordation, the Notice of Completion establishes a 30-day period for subcontractors and material vendors to file stop payment notices and initiates the start date for the warranty period. Since the work has been completed and accepted by the City, staff recommends the City Council approve the Notice of Completion and release the retention payment 30 days after recording the Notice of Completion, providing there are no stop notices for the project on file with the City.

Approving the recommended action would find the project complete, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Notice of Completion, and allow staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended action would find the project complete and allow staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.

Sufficient funding is available for the recommended actions.

ATTACHMENTS:

Notice of Completion for Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A Initiated By: Nazila Mokarram, Principal Civil Engineer Submitted By: Thomas Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager

ATTACHMENT

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Drive
Lake Forest, California, 92630

Fee Exempt – Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(C.C.C. 9204 - PUBLIC WORKS)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

1. The City of Lake Forest located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, 92630, has completed a public work of improvement described as Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A (PW 2022-05A) and Lake Forest Sports Park Parking Lot Slurry Seal (24P15) and accepted by the awarding authority upon the date hereof.

2. Date of completion: December 3, 2024

3. Description of work performed: Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A (PW 2022-05A) and Lake Forest Sports Park Parking Lot Slurry Seal (24P15)

4. The City’s interest in the property in which the public work was completed is: X Fee  Easement  Lease.

5. The real property upon which said public work was performed in the City of Lake Forest is: Public right-of-way in the City of Lake Forest.

6. The contractor was: American Asphalt South, Inc.

Dated ____________________________________ __________________________________________ Mark Tettemer, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________________________
Lisa Berglund, City Clerk

VERIFICATION

I, the undersigned, say: I am the Mayor of the City of Lake Forest , the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof, the same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Lake Forest, California, on this ____ day of _________________, 2024.

__________________________________________
Mark Tettemer, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________________________
Lisa Berglund, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO MARINA LANDSCAPE, INC. FOR IRRIGATION CONSERVATION PROGRAM PROJECT (PW 2022-03)
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Award a contract in the amount of $310,265.75 to Marina Landscape, Inc. for the Irrigation Conservation Program Project (PW 2022-03)

2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE
2023-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AMENDING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25.”

3. Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the award of contract to Marina Landscape, Inc. substantially in the form attached.

4. Reject all other bids received and authorize the return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents with Marina Landscape, Inc.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

During previous periods of extended drought, the State of California implemented various directives encouraging cities to convert non-functional turf to water efficient landscaping. In accordance with Strategic Plan #70, Non-Functional Turf Removal Study, the City developed the Irrigation Conservation Program Project (“Project”). The Project would remove approximately 40,000 square feet of turf grass in the slope and parkway landscaped area of El Toro Road, near the intersection of El Toro and Santa Margarita Parkway and install water-efficient landscaping. Marina Landscape, Inc. is the lowest bidder, with a contract amount of $310,265.75. A conditionally approved grant from the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County may provide approximately $98,000 in rebates. The recommended actions would award the contract, amend the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan to allocate additional funds, amend the 2023-2025 Operating Budget allowing the rebate revenue, and authorize the necessary agreement to proceed with the project.

BACKGROUND:

As part of the 2021-2028 Capital Improvement Project (“CIP”) Plan, the City developed a project to identify and convert existing Median, Parkways, and Slopes (“MPS”) landscape areas with turf grass into water efficient landscaping and irrigation. Staff is proposing to begin the project on El Toro Road starting approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of El Toro Road and Portola Parkway/Santa Margarita Parkway and continuing to the southerly parkway to Normandale Drive per Figure 1 below.

Fig. 1 – Project Area
This location is at the edge of the City’s MPS maintenance area, contains approximately 40,000 square feet of non-functional turf irrigated with potable water, and provides a logical starting point to begin converting turf areas. During previous periods of extended drought, the State of California has implemented various directives encouraging cities to convert non-functional turf to water efficient landscaping.

The City Manager previously approved an agreement with David Volz Design to prepare the design for the landscaping and staff advertised the project on OpenGov and in the Saddleback Valley News.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed scope of work includes removing up to 40,000 square feet of existing parkway and slope turf grass along the El Toro Road sidewalk and

installing a new water efficient landscaping and irrigation system. The project has been provisionally approved for a Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (“MWDOC”) turf removal grant. The grant amount would depend upon the square feet of turf removed. With the estimated square footage, the grant could be as much as $98,000 and would depend on final MWDOC approval, and the verification of field measurements.

The City received three bids on September 4, 2024, in OpenGov ranging from $310,265.75 to $357,946.00, with Marina being the apparent low bidder. Staff reviewed the bid package for completeness (Attachment 1). The submitted bids are as follows:

Table 1: Bid Results
Bidder Bid Amount
Marina Landscape, Inc. $310,265.75
Nieves Landscape, Inc. $349,746.59
Kormex Construction, Inc. $357,946.00
Marina has successfully completed projects for the City in the past and has previously provided the City with park landscape maintenance services. Staff conducted a reference check and received positive feedback from prior clients (Attachment 2). Staff believe that Marina is a responsible contractor and has the required experience and qualifications to complete the project and provide quality work.

The Finance Department prepared the contract with Marina and the City Attorney reviewed and approved the contract as to form. The contract amount based on the estimated quantities is $310,265.75. Per Lake Forest Municipal Code Section

3.13.085, the City Manager may approve additional work not-to-exceed 10% of the final contract amount ($31,026). There are $288,742 remaining for the construction of this project in the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. The proposed budget resolution (Attachment 3) would allocate funds from the City’s General Fund to provide additional funding needed for the turf conversion project and would also increase the General Fund Revenue budget in anticipation of the turf removal program rebate from MWDOC. If adopted, the proposed budget resolution would increase funding for the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan by $54,500 bringing the total funding to the project to $343,242 and would increase the revenue account by $98,000. Staff recommends approval of the Agreement with Marina.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approving the recommended actions would award a construction contract to Marina in the amount of $310,265.75. The attached proposed budget resolution would appropriate funds from the City’s General Fund CIP Projects to provide the additional funding needed for the Irrigation Conservation Program project and would also increase the General Fund Revenue budget in anticipation of the turf removal program rebate. If adopted, the proposed budget resolution would increase the revenue account by $98,000 and would increase funding for the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan by $54,500 bringing the total project funding to $343,242.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Agreement with Marina Landscape, Inc.

2. Contractor’s Reference Check

3. Proposed Budget Resolution
Initiated By: Jonathan Poole, Senior Management Analyst Submitted By: Thomas E. Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager

Attachment 1

IRRIGATION CONSERVATION PROGRAM (PW 2022-03)
(2024-097)

City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.

Lake Forest, CA 92630

Docusign Envelope ID: 3AC3D105-0D94-4DB0-A25B-FE9F2AAB735A City of Lake Forest
Section 00500 Construction Contract
Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03)
I. SECTION 00500 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ................................ ........

Docusign Envelope ID: 3AC3D105-0D94-4DB0-A25B-FE9F2AAB735A

Title: Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03)
3 1. SECTION 00500 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

1.1. CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made this [***INSERT DAY***] day of [***INSERT MONTH***], [***INSERT YEAR***], in the County of Orange, State of California, by and between the City of Lake Forest hereinafter called City, and Marina Landscape, Inc.., hereinafter called Contractor. City and the Contractor for the considerations stated herein agree as follows:

1.2. SCOPE OF WORK
The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated the contract and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in "COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT" section below for the following Project:

Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03), PW 2022-03 The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation.

1.3. TIME FOR COMPLETION
The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 90 working days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work.

1.4. CONTRACT PRICE
City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of THREE HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS AND SEVENTY FIVE CENTS ($310,265.75). Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions.

1.5. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay City the sum of five hundred dollars ($500) for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event that Liquidated Damages are not paid, the Contractor agrees City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Article does not affect the City’s rights to other damages or remedies specified in the Contract Documents or allowed by law.

1.6. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT
The “Contract Documents” include the following:
 Notice Inviting Bids
Docusign Envelope ID: 3AC3D105-0D94-4DB0-A25B-FE9F2AAB735A

Title: Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03)
4  Instructions to Bidders
 Bid Form
 Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation  Bid Bond
 Designation of Subcontractors
 Information Required of Bidders
 Noncollusion Declaration form
 Iran Contracting Act Certification
 Public Works Contractor Registration Certification
 Contract
 Performance Bond
 Payment Bond
 General Conditions
 Special Conditions
 Technical Specifications
 Addenda
 Plans and Drawings
 Approved and fully executed change orders
Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contactor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents.

All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties.

1.7. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW
Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Project.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3AC3D105-0D94-4DB0-A25B-FE9F2AAB735A

Title: Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03)
5 1.8. INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor shall provide indemnification as set forth in the General Conditions.

1.9. PREVAILING WAGES
Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at City Hall or may be obtained online at http//www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr. and which must be posted at the job site.

1.10. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written.

Marina Landscape, Inc.

By [VENDOR SIGNATURE 1]

Name: Ali Tavakoli
Title: Vice-President
License No. [CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER]

CITY OF LAKE FOREST
By [AUTHORIZED CITY SIGNATURE]
______________________________
Mark Tettemer
Mayor
By [VENDOR SIGNATURE 2]

Name: [Kristen Ness
Title: [Secretary (Corporation or LLC)
(If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR
Vice President AND Secretary OR Treasurer
REQUIRED)]

Attest:
[CITY CLERK SIGNATURE]

Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
Docusign Envelope ID: 3AC3D105-0D94-4DB0-A25B-FE9F2AAB735A 492862

Title: Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03)
6 [CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL]
[PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL]
[CITY CLERK - INSURANCE APPROVAL]
Approved as to Form:
[CITY ATTORNEY SIGNATURE]
__________________________________
Best Best & Krieger, LLP
City Attorney

Docusign Envelope ID: 3AC3D105-0D94-4DB0-A25B-FE9F2AAB735A

Attachment 2
City of Lake Forest
Public Works Department
Reference Check
Apparent Low Bidder: Contact #1: Contact #2: Contact #3:

Mariana Landscape, Inc. City of Milpitas City of Santa Ana Conejo Recreation & Park District
Name: Michael Silveira, P.E. Mindy Ly Andrew Mooney-
Phone No.:

Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

QUESTION RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE

1. Title and type of project McCandless Park Sports Field Cabrillo Park Irrigation Renovation Conejo Creek Southwest Park Development

2. Contract Amount $684,855 $483,997 $3,828,630

3. Approximate duration Approximately 12 months. 6 months (5) 12 Months construction – 3 month landscape mant / 1 year tree warranty

4. Actual or estimated project completion date Jun-23 May-24 22-Mar

5. Quality of the work Very Good Very Good Very Good

6. Contractor’s communication with agency representatives? Very Good Often via email, phone calls, or in person Good

7. Claims or stop notices No Stop notices or claims None None

8. Non-agency change order requests? Change order requested were justified. None None

9. Agency’s desire to have contractor bid on future projects Very Good Yes Yes

10. Additional Comments Great contract and administrator.

Pleasure to work with.

Overall happy with process, would like
to work with Marina in future
Irrigation Conservation Program (PW 2022-03)
4 9
6 7
3 ATTACHMENT
4 9
6 7
3 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE 2023-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN;

AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2024-25
WHEREAS, the 2023-2030 Capital Improvement Plan and 2023-25 Operating Budget were adopted by the City Council on June 20, 2023; and WHEREAS, the appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024-25 were adopted by the City Council on June 4, 2024;
WHEREAS, modifications are now required as a result of changes during Fiscal Year 2024-25.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE

FOREST DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council’s adoption of this Resolution is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. Specifically, the City’s adoption of the Resolution is an administrative and fiscal function of the City that does not commit the City to any specific project or course of action. (State CEQA Guidelines, sections 15378(b)(4) & (b)(5).) Thus, no environmental review of the Resolution is required. The City Council hereby directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption within five working days of the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 2. The General Fund Capital Fund and the General Fund are amended to increase the Capital Improvement Plan Appropriations and General Fund revenues for Fiscal Year 2024-25 as demonstrated in Exhibit A.

Section 3. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to move appropriations between programs within program area budgets in concurrence with Department Directors.

Section 4. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from one program area to another or between funds within the Operating Budget with notification to the City Council Audit Committee. 4 9
6 7
3 Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from a capital improvement project to another existing project within the adopted Capital Improvement Program with notification to the City Council Audit Committee.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall attest as to the adoption and execution of this Resolution and cause the same to be maintained in the permanent records of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ___________ 202_, by the following vote, to wit:

ATTEST:

MARK TETTEMER
MAYOR

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MATTHEW RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY
4 9
6 7
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024- was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the ____ day of _______ 202__, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK
4 9
6 7
3 EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT TO THE 2023-2030
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN;
AMENDMENT TO THE 2023-25
OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDMENT

TO FISCAL YEAR
2024-25 APPROPRIATIONS
Capital Improvement Plan Appropriations
Funding Source Project
Current
Budget
Increase
(Decrease)
Amended
Budget
General Fund
CIP Projects
Arterial Median
Improvement
Project $ 288,742 $54,500 $343,242
Total $343,242
General Fund Revenue Estimates by Type
Revenue Type
Current
Budget
Increase
(Decrease)
Amended
Budget
Intergovernmental $260,000 $98,000 $358,000
Total $358,000

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT:

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT OF A

PORTION OF THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT NOT

REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Conduct a Noticed Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT ABANDONING THAT

PORTION OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THAT
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 25052 FARTHING

STREET, CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, SOUGHT BY EMINENT

DOMAIN THAT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT;

2. Adopt The Proposed Resolution of Abandonment entitled: RESOLUTION OF

ABANDONMENT ABANDONING THAT PORTION OF A TEMPORARY

CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 25052 FARTHING STREET, CITY OF LAKE

FOREST, CALIFORNIA, SOUGHT BY EMINENT DOMAIN THAT IS NOT

REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT

3. Authorize City Staff and Counsel to file with the Court and serve on the Owner of Record a Notice of Abandonment.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council, on September 17, 2024, adopted a Resolution authorizing, in part, the acquisition by eminent domain of a Fee parcel and a Temporary Construction Easement (“TCE”) for the Jeronimo Road Widening Improvements Project. Upon further review, a portion of the TCE within the Forest Glen Apartments which impacts two parking spaces is not required. The abandonment of this area would remove the need to notify the residents of the Forest Glen Apartments as impacted parties in the eminent domain action.

This portion of the TCE may be abandoned pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.510, which would reduce the size of the TCE to be acquired, the amount of compensation to be paid for the TCE and eliminate its impact on two parking spaces at the Property. Staff recommends the City Council conduct a noticed Public Hearing to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Abandonment abandoning that portion of the TCE, sought by eminent domain, that is not required for the Jeronimo Road Widening Improvements Project (“Resolution”), adopt the Resolution, and direct staff and Counsel to file with the Court and serve on the Owner of Record a Notice Of Abandonment.

BACKGROUND:

The Jeronimo Road Widening Improvements Project (“Project”) was initially identified as part of the Foothill Circulation Phasing Program (“FCPP”) established by the Orange County Board of Supervisors in 1987 to provide for necessary road improvements in the Foothill area of Orange County, with those improvements being funded through development fees within the impacted areas.

The Project consists of widening Jeronimo Road north and south of El Toro Road to correct an existing misalignment of the through lanes. This intersection has one of the highest reported rates of automobile collisions in the city. The purpose of this Project is to improve safety and reduce traffic congestion.

The City Council Resolution of Necessity No. 2024-39, adopted on September 17, 2024, authorized, in part, the acquisition by eminent domain an area in Fee required for the construction of the widening as well as a TCE area to facilitate the construction. The City is authorized by Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.510 to abandon that portion of the TCE in a portion of that certain real property commonly known as 25052 Farthing Street, Lake Forest, California, more particularly described as Assessor’s Parcel No. 614-021-34 (“Property”), sought by eminent domain that is not required for the Jeronimo Road Widening Improvements Project.

DISCUSSION:

The City’s eminent domain action seeks the acquisition of a Fee area as well as a TCE. A portion of the TCE is no longer required for the Project. Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.510 authorizes the City to abandon the acquisition of property not required for the Project.

In reviewing the original TCE area, staff noted that two parking spaces would be impacted, as shown below in Figure 1. Including the parking spaces in the TCE would potentially require the notification of the residents of the Forest Glen Apartments as impacted parties in the eminent domain action.

Figure 1 – Original TCE Area
Staff reviewed the area with the design consultant and concluded the TCE would be sufficient to construct the project without the two parking spaces being included in the TCE. Staff revised the TCE area to remove the two parking spaces from the TCE area, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – New TCE Area
Because a portion of the TCE is not required for the Project, its acquisition should be abandoned to reduce the size of the TCE acquisition, as well as reduce the amount of compensation to be paid for the TCE, and eliminate its impact on two parking spaces at the Property.

Staff recommends the City Council conduct a noticed public hearing to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Abandonment (Attachment), adopt the Resolution, and direct staff and Counsel to file with the Court and serve on the Owner of Record a Notice Of Abandonment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City has deposited $337,000 with the Superior Court for the eminent domain action. The ultimate cost will be determined at a future date by the Superior Court. To the extent the abandonment has any impact on the valuation, staff anticipates the amount would be reduced.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proposed Resolution Of Abandonment
Initiated By: Douglas Erdman, Assistant City Engineer
Submitted By: Thomas Wheeler, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager

ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT ABANDONING THAT

PORTION OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT

IN THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 25052 FARTHING STREET, CITY OF LAKE FOREST,

CALIFORNIA, SOUGHT BY EMINENT DOMAIN THAT IS

NOT REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Forest (the “City”), on September 17, 2024, adopted Resolution of Necessity No. 2024-39 authorizing, in part, the acquisition by eminent domain of a temporary construction easement (“TCE”) in a portion of that certain real property commonly known as 25052 Farthing Street, Lake Forest, California, more particularly described as Assessor’s Parcel No. 614-021-34 (“Property”), for the construction and maintenance of the Jeronimo Road Widening Improvements Project (“Project”), in Lake Forest, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by Government Code sections 37350.5 and 40404 and Streets and Highways Code section 10102;

WHEREAS, a portion of the TCE is not required for the Project and would impact two parking spaces at the Property.

WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.510 to abandon the acquisition of property not required for the Project; and

WHEREAS, the City may now adopt a Resolution of Abandonment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND
DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Abandonment. The portion of the TCE originally sought to be acquired by eminent domain that is not required for the Project is hereby abandoned pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.510. The TCE without the abandoned property is more particularly described in the attached hereto Exhibit 1. Consistent with the authority granted to City staff and counsel in the Resolution of Necessity, they are authorized to file with the Court and serve on the owner of record a Notice of Abandonment and to undertake all related and required actions.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
2 Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ________ day of __________, 2024.

_____________________________________
Mayor of the City of Lake Forest, California

ATTEST

_______________________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___
3 CERTIFICATION

I, _______________, City Clerk the City of Lake Forest, California, and Ex- Officio Clerk of the City Council, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the actual resolution duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the ______ day of ___________, 2024, the following vote of the Council:

AYES: _____
NOES: _____
ABSENT: _____

_____________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California

55136.00895\42895848.1

EXHIBIT "A"TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTLEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A"TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTLEGAL DESCRIPTION Δ
1 OF 1CITY OF LAKE FORESTCOUNTY OF ORANGESTATE OF CALIFORNIATAIT & ASSOCIATES INC.701 PARKCENTER DRIVE, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705TEL. (714) 560-8200Engineering Surveying EnvironmentalTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1 inch = ft.0'
LEGEND:POINT OF COMMENCEMENTTRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGINDICATES RECORD DATAPER TRACT NO. 5803PROPERTY LINECENTERLINEFEE BY SEPARATE DOCUMENTTEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASE.PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION______________________________MICHAEL FURLONG, PLS 8899DATE: ________________________ N
EXHIBIT "B"
P.O.C.T.P.O.B( XXX )
6060'120'

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF TENTH FUNDING PHASE FOR THE CITY’S SHOP & DINE COMMUNITY GIFT CARD PROGRAM WITH YIFTEE, INC.

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee, Inc. and solely include the $50 and $100 gift card options with a limit of one gift card per purchaser for the Shop & Dine Community Gift Card Program.

2. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2024-25.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On October 4, 2022, the City formally authorized the Shop & Dine Community Gift Card Program (“CGCP”). The CGCP provides residents and visitors with an opportunity to buy community gift cards in increments of $50 or $100 and receive a matching gift card of the same value for free. The gift cards can only be used at Lake Forest businesses that apply for and receive approval to participate in the program.

The CGCP is the first major program funded in response to City Council’s approval of the Strategic Economic Investment Project (“SEIP”). The SEIP established a budget for economic development programs to help local businesses recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. The CGCP was originally approved with a $575,000 budget, which included $500,000 in funds to cover the costs of providing the free bonus gift cards. The City is party to the Community Card Customer Agreement with Yiftee, Inc. (“Yiftee”) for the provision of electronic cards (Attachment 1).

The City Council has approved nine funding phases of the CGCP so far. Phases two through nine have included a $565,000 budget. Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed tenth SEIP budget allocation to the CGCP in the amount of $565,000. To effectuate the tenth funding phase, staff recommends

the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee (Attachment 2). A draft resolution authorizing the budget appropriation of $565,000 to cover the costs of the tenth funding phase of the CGCP is also provided for City Council review (Attachment 3).

BACKGROUND:

On October 4, 2022, the City formally authorized the City’s CGCP. The CGCP provides residents and visitors with an opportunity to buy community gift cards in increments of $50 or $100 and receive a matching gift card of the same value for free. The gift cards can only be used at Lake Forest businesses that apply for and receive approval to participate in the program. The SEIP established a budget for economic development programs to help local businesses recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. The CGCP was approved with a $575,000 budget, which includes $500,000 in funds to cover the costs of providing the free bonus gift cards and $65,000 to cover the costs of the fees associated with card issuance. Table 1 below summarizes the funding phases that have been approved by the City Council since October 2022.

Table 1: BOGO Funding Phase Summary
Phase Approval
Date
Funding
Amount
Summary
Phase 1 10/4/2022 $575,000 Initial program launch. Launch included three funding rounds, with marketing
prioritized towards Lake Forest
residents. Funding amount included a
$10,000 contract with the Lake Forest
Chamber of Commerce to assist with
business recruitment.

Phase 2 2/21/2023 $565,000 Second phase of CGCP. Program was advertised broadly to the public. Staff
and HdL instituted a new vendor
agreement system and established
new program guidelines to enhance
the integrity of the program. $25 gift
card increment was removed to
mitigate fee costs.

Phase 3 8/15/2023 $565,000 Third phase of funding.

Marketed broadly to the public.

Phase 4 10/17/2023 $565,000 Fourth phase of funding.

Marketed broadly to the public.

Phase 5 11/21/2023 $565,000 Fifth phase of funding.

Marketed broadly to the public.

Phase 6 1/16/2024 $565,000 Sixth phase of funding.

Marketed broadly to the public.

Phase 7 3/5/2024 $565,000 Seventh phase of funding.

Marketed broadly to the public.

Phase 8 5/21/2024 $565,000 Eighth phase of funding.

Marketed broadly to the public.

Phase 9 11/5/2024 $565,000 Ninth phase of CGCP. Program was advertised broadly to the public.

Limited number of BOGO purchases to
one card per purchaser.

Pursuant to the CGCP, residents and visitors can buy gift cards in increments of $50 or $100. The gift cards are delivered electronically and can be used at any of the 126 participating Lake Forest businesses. The City covers the cost of the bonus card, plus the fees associated with card issuance. Table 2 below provides a breakdown of fees related to gift card issuance.

Table 2: BOGO Fees Paid to Yiftee
Fee Type Per Card Fee Amount
Fee for Issuance of Original Gift Card $1, plus 5% of card value Fee for Issuance of BOGO Gift Card $1
On October 22, the Audit Committee held its quarterly meeting. The Committee expressed its support for continued funding for the CGCP.

DISCUSSION:

To establish a tenth funding phase, staff have prepared the necessary contract documents for City Council consideration. Staff propose the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee (Attachment 2). In addition, staff propose the City Council allocate SEIP funds to support the costs of the new funding phase.

A budget resolution authorizing $565,000 toward the tenth funding phase of the CGCP is attached for City Council consideration (Attachment 3). The attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee includes the provision of gift cards in increments of $50 and $100 with a one-card maximum purchase cap.

These are the same card increments and purchase limits used for the ninth phase of CGCP funding. The City’s SEIP funding categories include sufficient funding to support a tenth phase of funding for the CGCP.

The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed and approved the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee as to form (Attachment 2). If the City Council directs the City Manager to enter into this agreement, the City Council will also need to consider the attached budget resolution, which would appropriate $565,000 from the City’s General Fund to cover the costs of the additional funding phase (Attachment 3).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Authorizing the attached Resolution would appropriate $565,000 to the City’s General Fund in the 2023-2025 Operating Budget to cover the costs of the proposed BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee, Inc.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Customer Card Agreement with Yiftee, Inc.

2. Proposed BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee, Inc.

3. Proposed Resolution Appropriating $565,000 for Community Gift Card Program
Initiated By: Adrian Grijalva, Economic Development/Housing Manager Submitted By: Keith Neves, Assistant City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
Community Card Customer Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made effective as of __________, 2022 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Yiftee Inc., a Delaware corporation, with an address at 325 Sharon Park Drive #215, Menlo Park, CA 94025 (“Yiftee”) and _____________________________________ with an address at _________________________________________(“Customer”). The parties agree a follows:

1. Definitions.

1.1 “Merchant” means a merchant, prospect or other contact that may be using or desire to use Yiftee Services to redeem eGifts.

1.2 “Participant” means a Merchant who has opted to participate in a Community Card by running an Activation Card and agreeing to the Merchant Agreement.

1.3 “Yiftee Services” means Yiftee’s gift-giving platform. It is the technology foundation for Community Cards.

1.4 “Purchaser” means a person or entity that purchases or redeems eGifts.

1.5 “eGift” means a digital virtual gift voucher used as payment for goods or services at a Participant.

1.6 “Offer” or “Offers” mean specific benefits that Participants provide to consumers who use their Community Cards in their store, as determined by the Participants and posted on their eGift Card web page.

2. Merchant Enrollment.

2.1 Merchant Enrollment Obligations
(a) Customer will collect a set of Merchants who have elected to participate in the Yiftee Services.

Merchants must all be located in the same state in the USA, due to varying gift card laws by state. Each Merchant must agree to the Yiftee Community Card Merchant Agreement located on the Yiftee.com website. Merchants who have not agreed to the Merchant Agreement will not be able to utilize the Yiftee Services to redeem eGifts. Customer will upload into the Yiftee Services or provide the names of the Merchants who intend to participate to Yiftee. Upon the agreed upon launch date, the billing for the Yiftee Services will begin (“Commencement Date”). This billing will include the agreed-upon cost for each Participant or group thereof as defined in Appendix A. (b) Yiftee will provide to Customer or directly to Merchants, upon receipt of the set of Merchant names in 2.1a, a set of unique Activation Cards to be run by each Merchant. Customer will inform Merchants of their individual Activation Card and provide instructions on its use. Additionally, Customer will inform Merchants that running the Activation Card implies consent to the Merchant Agreement located on the Yiftee.com website.
(c) As Merchants run the Activation Cards, they will be included in the set of Merchants enabled to participate in the Yiftee Services, i.e. the Participants. Participant may also post their Offers to be available for eGift Card holders who redeem gifts in their stores. 100 Civic Center Dr., Lake Forest, CA 92630
City of Lake Forest
DocuSign Envelope ID: BEBEC6F7-D026-426B-9118-BA0B8330B956 October 17, 2022
(d) Yiftee will bill Customer or Merchants as described in Appendix A. Customer can add or remove Participants and fees will be adjusted accordingly, if applicable. There will be no retroactive adjustments allowed by Yiftee (that is, a cancelled Participant’s billing obligation will result in that Participant’s cost to Customer, as defined in Appendix A, to be eliminated beginning only on the next annual billing cycle).

A Participant may be added to the list of Participants at any time (“Enrollment Time”), with billing adjustment for said Participant to begin immediately and to be included in the current month’s billing. (e) Each party shall comply with good, ethical and moral business practices and all applicable laws and regulations in engaging in any activities here under.
(f) Fees and payment terms applicable to the subject matter here under shall be as set forth in Appendix A. Customer is not entitled to compensation other than what is described in Appendix A. (g) Customer is responsible and liable for any disputes or liability arising out of its relationships with Merchants and Participants, except with respect to any liability of Yiftee under this agreement.

2.2 Yiftee Materials.

Yiftee may provide Customer with certain materials for use in conjunction with promoting the Yiftee Services here under (“Yiftee Materials”). No rights or licenses, express or implied, are granted in those Yiftee Materials or otherwise, except as expressly and unambiguously set forth in this Agreement.

2.3 Limited Licenses.

Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Yiftee hereby grants to Customer, a non- exclusive, non-transferable, non-assignable, non-sublicensable right and license to access and use the Yiftee Services and Yiftee Materials solely for the purposes of Customer’s performance of this Agreement.

2.4 Trademark License.

Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Yiftee hereby grants Customer and Customer hereby grants Yiftee a non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-assignable, non-sublicensable, royalty-free license to use Yiftee’s or Customer’s name, trade names, trademarks, service marks, and logos (collectively, a party’s “Marks”) solely in connection with Customer’s and Yiftee’s promotion and marketing of the Yiftee Services, subject to written usage guidelines, if any, made mutually available.

3. Ownership. As between the parties, Yiftee owns all right, title and interest in and to the Yiftee Services, Yiftee’s Marks and the Yiftee Materials. Customer owns all right, title and interest in and to Customer’s Marks.

4. Warranties Disclaimer. YIFTEE AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO WARRANTIES TO CUSTOMER,

EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,

NONINFRINGEMENT, AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND ALL WARRANTIES ARISING OUT OF USAGE OR TRADE, COURSE OF DEALING AND COURSE OF PERFORMANCE.

5. Liability Limitation. EXCEPT FOR LIABILITY ARISING UNDER SECTION 7, NEITHER PARTY (NOR ITS

LICENSORS) WILL BE LIABLE OR OBLIGATED WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS

AGREEMENT OR UNDER ANY CONTRACT, TORT, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE

THEORY, WHETHER OR NOT ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, FOR ANY

SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, RELIANCE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUE, DATA OR USE AND IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY’S DocuSign Envelope ID: BEBEC6F7-D026-426B-9118-BA0B8330B956 LIABILITY EXCEED THE GREATER OF $500 OR THE AMOUNTS PAID AND/OR PAYABLE BY YIFTEE TO

CUSTOMER (AND/OR BY CUSTOMER TO YIFTEE, IF PAYMENTS ARE PAYABLE BY CUSTOMER TO YIFTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSAL) HEREUNDER IN THE TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE APPLICABLE CLAIM.

6. Term and Termination.

6.1 Term. This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue in full force on an annual period from the Effective Date, and thereafter shall automatically renew annually, unless and until either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.2.

6.2 Termination.
(a) Either party may, at its option, terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party for any reason or for no reason whatsoever. (b) Either party may terminate this Agreement if the other party materially breaches a term of this Agreement and fails to cure such breach within fifteen (15) days after receipt of written notice of such breach from the non-breaching party.
(c) Participants are obligated to honor all outstanding eGifts issued by Yiftee for the entire duration of those eGift's validity periods. Termination does not relieve Participants from honoring conditions outlined in the Merchant Agreement.

6.3 Effect of Termination. Upon any termination: (a) Customer shall immediately cease all promotion of the Yiftee Services and shall immediately return to Yiftee, or at the option of Yiftee, destroy, all Confidential Information (as defined below) of Yiftee disclosed to Customer, Yiftee Materials, and any Yiftee Services, hardware and software provided to Customer here under, (b) Yiftee shall immediately return to Customer, or at the option of Customer, destroy, all Confidential Information of Customer disclosed to Yiftee here under, and (c) all licenses granted under this Agreement shall immediately cease. The following Sections shall survive termination and remain in effect 1, 3, 4, 5, 6.3, 7 and 8. Any termination of this Agreement shall be without prejudice to any other rights or remedies available under this Agreement or at law.

7. Confidentiality. Because of this Agreement, the parties may have access to information that is confidential to the disclosing party (“Confidential Information”). Confidential Information shall include, without limitation, Purchaser lists and information relating to the parties’ products and pricing and all information designated as confidential by the disclosing party at the time of disclosure. A party’s Confidential Information shall not include any information which (i) becomes generally publicly available through no wrongful act or omission of the receiving party; (ii) is lawfully acquired by the receiving party from a third party without any breach of a confidentiality obligation; or (iii) is independently developed without use of or reference to the disclosing party’s Confidential Information. Each party agrees to maintain the confidentiality of the other party’s Confidential Information using the same degree of care that it uses with regard to its confidential information of like nature, but in no event less than reasonable care, and to protect as a trade secret any portion of the other party’s Confidential Information by preventing any unauthorized copying, use, distribution, installation or transfer of possession of such information. If required by law, the receiving party may disclose Confidential Information of the disclosing party, but will give adequate prior notice of such disclosure to the disclosing party to permit the disclosing party to intervene and to request protective orders or other confidential treatment therefor. The parties acknowledge that money damages will not be an adequate DocuSign Envelope ID: BEBEC6F7-D026-426B-9118-BA0B8330B956 remedy if this Section 7 is breached and, therefore, either party may, in addition to any other legal or equitable remedies, seek an injunction or other equitable relief against such breach or threatened breach without the necessity of posting any bond or surety.

8. Non-solicitation
During the term of this Agreement, neither party will (on behalf of itself or any other person or entity) solicit any Purchaser or Merchant of the other party to restrict, limit, or terminate such Purchaser’s or Merchant’s participation in the other party’s products and services.

9. Miscellaneous

9.1 Choice of Law. This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the provisions of the conflict of laws thereof. The parties will resolve any disputes in the state or federal courts located in Santa Clara County, California, to whose exclusive jurisdiction and venue they irrevocably submit. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, either party may pursue injunctive or other equitable relief in any court of competent jurisdiction.

9.2 Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted in this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the day of service if served personally or by facsimile transmission with confirmation, or three (3) days after mailing if mailed by First Class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective parties at the addresses set forth above, or at such other addresses as may be specified by either party pursuant to the terms and provisions of this section.

9.3 Assignment. Customer may not assign or otherwise transfer, without the prior written consent of Yiftee, its rights, duties or obligations under this Agreement to any person or entity, in whole or in part. Yiftee may freely assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement in connection with the sale of all or substantially all of its business or assets. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

9.4 Severability. Any provision of this Agreement that is determined to be unenforceable or unlawful shall not affect the remainder of the Agreement and shall be severable therefrom, and the unenforceable or unlawful provision shall be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary to that this Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable.

9.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior agreements between them, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be amended, modified or provision hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties hereto. No waiver by either party, whether express or implied, of any provision of this Agreement, or of any breach thereof, shall constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a breach or waiver of any other provision of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

Customer (Print): YIFTEE, INC.

By: By:

Name, Title: Name, Title: Donna Novitsky, Yiftee CEO City of Lake Forest
Debra Rose, City Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: BEBEC6F7-D026-426B-9118-BA0B8330B956 Approved as to Form:

Best Best & Krieger LLP, City Attorney
Attest:

Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Community Card Customer Agreement

APPENDIX A
Pricing

Customer and Participants are not required to pay Yiftee a subscription fee or a revenue share. Yiftee does not take a percentage of the cards that are redeemed in the Participants’ stores.

Charges:

Purchasers pay the face value of the card plus a $1+5% of the eGift Card value eDelivery fee at the time of purchase. Bulk purchases of one thousand dollars ($1000) or more, and enterprise accounts may qualify for a reduced eDelivery fee by depositing funds into their Yiftee eGifting accounts by check or ACH and disabling credit cards.

Participants pay Mastercard processing fees for a card-not-present (CNP) transaction upon redemption.

Yiftee does not control these fees, they are set by the Merchant Acquirer who is their credit card processor.

Subject to applicable laws, Yiftee will implement a monthly maintenance fee on eGift Cards that have been inactive (i.e. no spending on the Card) for periods of greater than 12 months. This will be made clear to cardholders on the face of the eGift Card when implemented, as is required by law.

Yiftee eGift Cards do not generally expire. Subject to applicable laws, in some cases eGift Cards given by corporations or merchants as promotions, rewards and awards may have expiration dates. In the case of eGift Cards expiring, Yiftee retains 10% of the original eGift Card value not to exceed the remaining unspent funds and refunds the balance to the purchaser’s Yiftee eGift Card account. eDelivery fees are not refunded.

Participants may choose, at their discretion, to post Offers to encourage Purchasers to use their Community Cards in their stores.

Participants may choose, at their discretion, to offer rebates as fund raisers to local groups such as schools, churches and other non-profits. Such programs are an incentive for the local groups to sell Community Cards to their members, and for the Purchasers to use them in specific stores who are offering rebates. Yiftee will work with the Participants and Purchasers to execute such programs.

No tipping is allowed on Yiftee eGift Cards.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BEBEC6F7-D026-426B-9118-BA0B8330B956

ATTACHMENT 2

www.yiftee.com – 325 Sharon Park Drive #215, Menlo Park, CA 94025 – (650) 533-0938 Keep Local Dollars Local
Yiftee Comm Card BOGO Campaign Quickstart
(Please complete sections in orange)
Community and Campaign Name: (e.g., COVID Recovery 2021) _________________________ Contact Name: __________________________
eMail: ________________________ Phone: ________________________ Campaign Start date: ____________ Stop date: “while supplies last” or date: _________ Campaign budget: $_______________ Yiftee must receive funds by check or ACH (minimum $2500) pre-launch to pay for bonus gifts. Promotion will automatically cease when funds run out. Optional alert when balance drops to a certain level. Alert at amount: $_______ Offer description/banner copy: check A, B or C below and specify amounts. Please create a banner using this copy (760 x 100, example on pg 2).
_____ A. 50% or 100% match any value, example: Buy a card for any value $10-$125 and get a matching value bonus card. Limit X bonus cards per purchaser. Available while supplies last. Bonus cards must be used in X days. Purchased card range: $______ to $______. Match level (check one): ___ 50% or ____ 100%. Limit: ______ or none. Expires after # days: _____ or date: _________. _____ B. Total shopping cart value, example: Get a $20 bonus gift for every $80 you spend. Limit X bonus cards per purchaser. Available while supplies last. Bonus cards must be used in X days.

Get a $_____ bonus gift for every $_____ you spend. Limit: ______ or none. Expires after # days: _____ or date: __________.
_____ C. Specific price points, example: Buy $25 and get a $10 bonus gift; buy $50 and get a $20 bonus gift; buy $100 and get a $40 bonus gift. Limit X bonus cards per purchaser. Available while supplies last.

Bonus cards must be used in X days. (1-5 levels allowed, only specific price points) Buy $______, Get $_____; Buy $______, Get $_____; Buy $______, Get $_____. Limit: ______ or none. Expires after # days: _____ or date: _________.

Optional limits: You can define a limit of 1,2,3,4,5,9, or 10 bonus gifts per purchaser, or $50, $125, $300 total bonus gift value per purchaser (irrespective of recipients). Only those values are available. Limit applies to entire campaign duration, restarts for new campaigns.

Buyer $1+5% eDelivery fee: Who pays buyer eDelivery fee, ____ you or ____ buyer (check one) Bonus gift $1 eDelivery fee and customer eD fees (if elected) paid out of funds on deposit.

Refunds: Purchasers may contact [email protected] for refunds but Yiftee will retain the eDelivery fee regardless of who paid it to cover costs.

Bonus Card expiration: _____ days from card issue or a specific date: _____________. When gifts expire, Yiftee returns the unused amount to Community, less restocking fee which is the lesser of 10% of the original bonus gift value or the remaining unused amount of the gift.

Lake Forest Shop & Dine Community Gift Card
Tim Campbell
[email protected]
(424) 228-8517, x. 1140
12/17/24
While supplies last
565,000
50,000

x
50 50
100
100
1 180
x
180
Docusign Envelope ID: B670CAC1-A616-4EBF-992A-05D612BC999F www.yiftee.com – 325 Sharon Park Drive #215, Menlo Park, CA 94025 – (650) 533-0938 Keep Local Dollars Local
Bonus gift message (255 char limit, example): Thank you for purchasing _________________. Enjoy this bonus gift - designed to support our independent restaurants and retailers. To spur the economy quickly, this bonus gift will expire _____________. Make any changes you want or write a different message here, but please stay within character limit.

Bonus gift signature (25 char limit, who it is from): ____________________________________.

Campaign changes are not allowed once campaign has been launched. Yiftee requires a minimum of 48 hrs from signed Quickstart to implement; funding and banner must have been received prior to implementation. Minimum 1 week in between campaigns to avoid confusion.

Bonus gift terms: The terms including expiration, bonus value and limits (if applicable) should be clearly stated on your web site, marketing materials and in the banner on the Yiftee gift purchase page. Please submit all planned advertising of the program for Yiftee review prior to launch. We want to make sure that all restrictions and terms are clearly articulated in the material that advertises the program. Do not begin marketing prior to campaign start date. If marketing starts prior to campaign start date, Yiftee reserves the right to deliver bonus gifts to early purchasers once the campaign begins.

Required Images:

Please provide a 760x100 pixel banner that clearly states your promo language such as Gift card 300 x 200 pixels minimum:

We can use your regular card image, or you can provide something custom. We recommend not a complete change so as not to confuse merchants, but you could add a BONUS indication.

Fee for promotion: Program Fee: waived (normally $100/location) eDelivery fee: $1/gift sent, deposited in advance of campaign start by check or ACH, along with gift funds.

Restocking fees for expired bonus gifts as described above.

Accepted on behalf of Community Yiftee, Inc.

Signature ________________________________
Print____________________________________ Donna Novitsky, CEO
Date_____________________________________
Receive a $25 Bonus Gift for Every $50 You Spend.

Offer expires 8/31/2020, available while supplies last. Limit 4/purchaser.
the Lake Forest Shop and Dine Card
6 months after purchase
City of Lake Forest
Debra Rose, City Manager
Docusign Envelope ID: B670CAC1-A616-4EBF-992A-05D612BC999F

ATTACHMENT 3

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

WHEREAS, the 2023-2025 Operating Budget was adopted by the City Council on June 20, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024-25 were adopted by the City Council on June 4, 2024;

WHEREAS, modifications are now required as a result of changes during Fiscal Year 2024-25.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE

FOREST DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 2. The General Fund is amended to increase appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024-25 as demonstrated in Exhibit A.

Section 3. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to move appropriations between programs within program area budgets in concurrence with Department Directors.

Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations from a capital improvement project to another existing project within the adopted Capital Improvement Program with notification to the City Council Audit Committee.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall attest as to the adoption and execution of this Resolution and cause the same to be maintained in the permanent records of the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3
rd day of December 2024,
by the following vote, to wit:

ATTEST:

MARK TETTEMER
MAYOR

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MATTHEW RICHARDSON

CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF LAKE FOREST )

I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024- was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the 3rd day of December 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

LISA BERGLUND

CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT A

AMENDMENT TO 2023-2025

OPERATING BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

APPROPRIATIONS

General Fund Operating Appropriations

Expenditure
Major Program
Area

Current
Budget

Increase
(Decrease)

Amended
Budget
Community Vitality &
Engagement $2,860,978 $565,000 $3,425,978

Lake Forest City CouncilDecember 3, 2024

Lake Forest City Council
December 3, 2024