AGENDA
LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting of the City Council
Tuesday, December 3, 2024
Public Session 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California NOTICE: Pursuant to Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 2.04.010, Regular Meetings of the City Council are held the First and Third Tuesday of each month at the hour of 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session matters, if required.
The Public Session of the meeting shall commence at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Special Meeting times may be held at a different time and date as listed on the Agenda.
AGENDA DOCUMENT REVIEW: The Agenda and staff reports are available on the Internet at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas and at the City Clerk’s Office, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, on the Friday before the meeting on Tuesday.
AGENDA DESCRIPTION: The Agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public of a general summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The listed Recommended Action represents staff’s recommendation. The City Council may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the recommended action.
AGENDA ON SOCIAL MEDIA: This meeting will be streamed through Facebook Live. Comments will not be taken via Facebook Live. The City provides the Facebook Live stream as an additional service to the public.
However, the City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the site will be uninterrupted. The City is not responsible for any interrupted service.
SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEETING AND PUBLIC COMMENT:
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: In addition to attending in person, members of the public may access the meeting live on our website at https://www.lakeforestca.gov/en/government/meeting-agendas-and-minutes/meeting-agendas.
PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO THE MEETING: Members of the public may submit email comments to [email protected]. Email comments will be uploaded to the agenda packet and made part of the official public record of the meeting and will not be read at the meeting. To ensure staff reviews all comments prior to the City Council meeting, please submit email comments no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public may provide comments in-person at the meeting. Public comments will no longer be accepted remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in-person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk. To ensure prompt distribution to the City Council, members of the public wishing to provide written materials to the City Council should do so prior to the start of the meeting or as close thereto as possible, as time will not be taken during the public comment period to distribute written materials to the City Council.
TRANSLATION SERVICE: Interpreters are available by request to members of the public that prefer to make their public comments in Spanish or Chinese. Requests for a translator need to be received by 8:00 a.m. the Monday before the scheduled City Council meeting. Such requests must be received via email at [email protected]
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 Los intérpretes están disponibles previa solicitud para el público que prefiera hacer sus comentarios públicos en español o chino. Las solicitudes de traductor deben recibirse antes de las 8:00 a. m. del lunes anterior a la reunión programada del Concejo Municipal. Dichas solicitudes deben recibirse por correo electrónico a [email protected]
如果大眾願意用西班牙語或中文發表公開評論，我們可應要求提供口譯服務。需要在預定市議會會議之前的周一
上午 8:00 之前收到翻譯請求。此類請求必須透過電子郵件收到：[email protected] Rúguǒ dàzhòng yuànyì yòng xībānyá yǔ huò zhōngwén fābiǎo gōngkāi pínglùn, wǒmen kě yīng yāoqiú tígōng k ǒuyì fúwù. Xūyào zài yùdìng shì yìhuì huìyì zhīqián de zhōuyī shàngwǔ 8:00 Zhīqián shōu dào fānyì qǐngqiú. Cǐ l èi qǐngqiú bìxū tòuguò diànzǐ yóujiàn shōu dào: [email protected] CALL TO ORDER:
Council Members:
Mayor Pro Tem:
Mayor:
City Manager:
City Attorney:
City Clerk:
6:30 p.m.
Doug Cirbo
Robert Pequeño
Benjamin Yu
Scott Voigts
Mark Tettemer
Debra Rose
Matthew E. Richardson
Lisa Berglund
PUBLIC SESSION: 6:30 p.m.
PUBLIC SESSION: At this time, the City Council will convene to consider public matters. Those wishing to address the City Council must submit a completed “Request to Speak” form to the City Clerk prior to City Council action.
INVOCATION: The Invocation will be provided by Chaplain Serena Cummins, Orange County Sheriff’s Department.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country to be led by Boy Scout Troop #628.
REPORT FROM STUDENT LIAISON: Report from Maya Lowrey, Student Liaison from El Toro High School.
PRESENTATIONS (Item Nos. 1 – 3)
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2
1. 2024 HALLOWEEN HOUSE DECORATING CONTEST
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recognize 2024 Halloween Decorating Contest Winner Linda MacPherson
2. MAYOR'S AWARD
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Present Mayor's Award to the selected recipient(s).
3. SERVICE AWARDS
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Present Employee Service Awards to those present.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public can submit an e-comment to [email protected]. E-comments will not be read at the meeting.
Members of the public may also provide comments in-person at the meeting or remotely. Those wishing to provide comments in- person at the meeting will be asked to submit a request to speak to the City Clerk.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Item Nos. 4 – 10)
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
4. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON NOVEMBER 19, 2024
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve as submitted.
6. CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the warrant register in the amount of $7,048,708.73.
7. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct second reading of and Adopt an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE
FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
8. AMENDMENT OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST PERSONNEL RULES
AND REGULATIONS
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE LAKE FOREST,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT OF THE PERSONNEL
RULES AND REGULATIONS
9. NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR NON-ARTERIAL STREETS, ZONE A (PW 2022-05A) AND LAKE FOREST SPORTS PARK PARKING LOT
(24P15) SLURRY SEAL PROJECTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Find that American Asphalt South, Inc. has completed construction of Slurry Seal Project for Non-Arterial Streets, Zone A (PW 2022-05A) and Lake Forest Sports Park Parking Lot Slurry Seal (24P15). 2. Approve the Notice of Completion and authorize the Mayor to execute the document on behalf of the City. 3. Authorize City Clerk to submit Notice of Completion for recordation to the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County within fifteen days of the City Council approval, as required by Section 9204 of the California Civil Code. 4. Authorize staff to release any unencumbered retention in accordance with California law.
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4
10. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO MARINA LANDSCAPE, INC.
FOR IRRIGATION CONSERVATION PROGRAM PROJECT (PW 2022-03) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Award a contract in the amount of $310,265.75 to Marina Landscape, Inc. for the Irrigation Conservation Program Project (PW 2022-03). 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled, “A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE 2023-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN, AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25.” 3.
Authorize the Mayor to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the award of contract to Marina Landscape, Inc. substantially in the form attached. 4.
Reject all other bids received and authorize the return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents with Marina Landscape, Inc.
PUBLIC HEARING(S) (Item No. 11)
Public Hearings are scheduled for a time certain of 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. City Council, when considering the matter scheduled for hearing, will take the following actions: 1. Open the Public Hearing. 2. Receive staff report. 3. Accept public testimony. 4. City Council comments and questions. 5. Close the Public Hearing and take appropriate action.
11. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT
OF A PORTION OF THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
NOT REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Conduct a Noticed Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION OF
ABANDONMENT ABANDONING THAT PORTION OF A TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 25052 FARTHING STREET, CITY OF LAKE
FOREST, CALIFORNIA, SOUGHT BY EMINENT DOMAIN THAT IS NOT
REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT; 2. Adopt The Proposed Resolution of Abandonment entitled:
RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT ABANDONING THAT PORTION OF A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN THAT CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 25052 FARTHING STREET, CITY
OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, SOUGHT BY EMINENT DOMAIN THAT
IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE JERONIMO ROAD WIDENING
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. 3. Authorize City Staff and Counsel to file with the Court and serve on the Owner of Record a Notice of Abandonment.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS (Item No. 12)
The following matters are for City Council consideration/discussion/action. Members of the public may have the opportunity to address these items if they wish to do so. Please complete the Request to Speak form and give to the City Clerk.
12. CONSIDERATION OF TENTH FUNDING PHASE FOR THE CITY’S SHOP & DINE COMMUNITY GIFT CARD PROGRAM WITH YIFTEE, INC.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into the attached BOGO Campaign Quickstart Agreement with Yiftee, Inc. and solely include the $50 and $100 gift card options with a limit of one gift card per purchaser for the Shop & Dine Community Gift Card Program. 2. Adopt a Resolution Entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
At this time, the City Manager may comment on agenda and non-agenda items; and report on items of interest to the City Council and community.
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 Mayor Tettemer:
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
At this time, City Council Members may comment on agenda or non-agenda matters. No discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, respond to statements made or questions posed by the public, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. In addition, the City Council may refer to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequent meeting or direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. No action may be taken on non-agenda matters unless authorized by law (Government Code Section 54954.2).
Council Member Cirbo:
Council Member Pequeño:
Council Member Yu:
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts:
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (949) 461-3400.
Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and agenda back-up materials can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk on the Friday prior to the City Council meeting. Copies of all Agendas, Staff Reports and Supporting Materials can also be found on the City’s website – https://www.lakeforestca.gov/129/Agendas.
Agenda and agenda packets, if requested, will be made available in an appropriate alternative format to persons with a disability as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Copies of the agenda are provided at no cost and agenda back-up materials are available at the per page copy cost.
The City of Lake Forest mailing address is City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California.
Phone: (949) 461-3400. FAX (949) 461-3511
CERTIFICATION: I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, California, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was posted for public review at City Hall on November 27, 2024.
Lisa Berglund
City Clerk
December 3, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 8
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: Management Services
SUBJECT:
2024 HALLOWEEN HOUSE DECORATING CONTEST
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Recognize 2024 Halloween Decorating Contest Winner Linda MacPherson EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City hosts an annual Halloween House Decorating Contest in which residents can post pictures of their own homes or a neighborhood home that is decorated for Halloween. The photos are posted on the City’s Facebook page, allowing others to visit the homes and vote on the home they find spookiest.
This year’s contest drew thirteen entries, with Linda MacPherson’s ”Pirates of the Caribbean” display on Summer Creek taking top honors. Ms. MacPherson’s display was interactive, allowing children of all ages the opportunity to push buttons to bring the pirates to life. Not one to rest on her laurels, Ms.
MacPherson is already getting her home ready for the City’s Holiday Lights contest.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Halloween House Contest Winner Certificate
Initiated By: Jonathan Volzke, Communications and Marketing Manager Submitted By: Sean McGovern, Deputy City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment
CERTIFICATE OF
FIRST PLACE WINNER
THE LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL
HEREBY RECOGNIZES
Linda MacPherson
FOR WINNING THE
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
2024 HALLOWEEN HOUSE DECORATING CONTEST
DECEMBER 3, 2024
___________________
MARK TETTEMER
Mayor
_____________ _____________
SCOTT VOIGTS DOUG CIRBO
Mayor Pro Tem Council Member
_____________ _____________
ROBERT PEQUEÑO BENJAMIN YU
Council Member Council Member
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/03/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUBJECT:
MAYOR'S AWARD
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Present Mayor's Award to the selected recipient(s).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In March 2018, the City Council established a Mayor’s Award to be presented annually based upon exceptional performance by a staff member. Seven nominations were submitted by City employees and four finalists were reviewed by the City Council Ad-Hoc committee, comprised of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, for selection. Tonight, the Mayor’s Award will be presented to the selected winner(s), whom the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem felt best exemplified the established criteria over the past year.
BACKGROUND:
In March 2018, the City Council established a Mayor’s Award to be awarded annually based upon exceptional performance by an employee or a group of employees. Nominations are submitted by City employees and members of the City Council using the Mayor’s Award Nomination Form. Received nominations are then reviewed by the Management Team. The Management Team recommends three to five “finalist” nominees for the City Council Ad-Hoc committee to review. The Ad- Hoc committee, comprised of the Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem, selects one employee or group of employees from the finalists who they feel best exemplifies the established criteria.
Nominations for the Mayor’s Award are presented to employees who have demonstrated excellence in one or more of these areas:
1.Performance: Continued and repeated excellence in overall job performance, which exceeded job requirements and achieved outstanding results.
2.Problem-solving: Solved an extraordinary problem or achieved a considerably difficult goal.
2 2
6 5
3.Innovation: Successfully implemented an innovative idea where an outstanding result, such as significant cost savings or maximized program effectiveness, was identified.
4.Outstanding Act: Achieved an outstanding act, which brings positive recognition to the City from the public or media.
5.Customer Service: Provided exceptional support to a resident or City department, division, project, group, or individual.
6.Teamwork: Efforts created excellent teamwork, resulting in a significant accomplishment by the team.
7.Community Contribution: Facilitating a positive change by contributing time, talent, or leadership to one or more community organizations.
______________
DISCUSSION:
The following employees were selected as finalists for the Mayor’s Award:
1.Chris Groves: Chris serves as the Administrative Services Manager in Public Works and has been instrumental in partnering with a local City to jointly procure a new solid waste agreement. She has worked diligently to ensure the project remains well-organized and on track.
Chris consistently meets project deadlines, demonstrating her strong commitment to excellence. Furthermore, she ensures the City adheres to all requirements, maintaining compliance and contributing significantly to the project’s overall success.
2.John Meza: John serves as the Management Analyst in the Finance Department and has demonstrated exceptional skills in building strong working relationships with his peers. Always willing to lend a hand when needed, John exemplifies teamwork and collaboration. He consistently displays a strong work ethic, going above and beyond to exceed expectations in completing projects, making him a valuable asset to the department.
3.Patricia Robinson: Patricia serves as the Administrative Specialist in the City Clerk Department and has played a pivotal role in the successful re- opening of the City’s passport services program this past year. Through her unwavering dedication and attention to detail, Patricia consistently provides exceptional customer service with the customers she meets with. Her efforts have assisted with surpassing the program’s revenue goal. Her commitment and efforts have been instrumental in the program's success.
2 2
6 5
4.Vendor Enforcement Team (VET): This exceptional team comprised of Winston Karuga, Acting Code Enforcement Supervisor; Lily Montano, Code Enforcement Officer; Omar Pinto, Code Enforcement Officer; Tony Villegas, Landscape Administrator; and Justin Kirk, Street Maintenance Administrator. The VET team demonstrated outstanding teamwork and collaboration, prioritizing the safety and well-being of the Lake Forest community. Through their combined efforts in outreach and educational campaigns, they successfully informed vendors, patrons, and local businesses about permit requirements and available resources. Their initiatives not only promoted compliance but also fostered a safer and more informed Lake Forest community.
Tonight, the Mayor’s Award will be presented to the selected winner(s), whom the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem felt best exemplified the established criteria over the past year. The award finalists will receive a Certificate of Recognition from the City Council. The award recipient(s) will receive a Certificate of Recognition from the City Council, City plaque, and $250 check or gift card to a Lake Forest business or restaurant.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Council Policy: Mayor’s Award
2. Sample Recognition Certificate
Initiated By: Mika Toyooka, Management Assistant
Submitted By: Keith Neves, Assistant City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment 1
City Council Policy: Mayor’s Award
Adopted 3/15/18
Revised 3/2/21 Page 1 of 2
CITY COUNCIL POLICY: MAYOR’S AWARD
Revised: January 2, 2024
A. Purpose
This policy is established to identify and recognize outstanding achievement by a Lake Forest employee or group of employees who has fulfilled one or more of seven developed criteria areas.
B. Applicability of Policy
This policy applies to any group or individual classified as a full-time employee(s) in good standing with the City. Any employee(s) that received the annual award shall not be eligible to receive it again for three subsequent calendar years.
C. Criteria
1. Performance: Continued and repeated excellence in overall job performance, which exceeded job requirements and achieved outstanding results.
2. Problem-solving: Solved an extraordinary problem or achieved a considerably difficult goal.
3. Innovation: Successfully implemented an innovative idea where an outstanding result, such as significant cost savings or maximized program effectiveness, was identified.
4. Outstanding Act: Achieved an outstanding act, which brings positive recognition to the City from the public or media.
5. Customer Service: Provide exceptional support to a resident or City department, division project, group or individual.
6. Teamwork: Efforts created excellent teamwork, resulting in a significant accomplishment by a team.
7. Community Contribution: Facilitating a positive change by contributing time, talent, or leadership to one or more community organizations.
City Council Policy: Mayor’s Award
Adopted 3/15/18
Revised 3/2/21 Page 2 of 2
D. Process
1. The Mayor’s Award will be presented to one employee or group of employees annually by City Council.
2. The Human Resources Division will oversee the nomination and selection process.
3. Nominations:
a. Nominations will be submitted by City employees or
members of the City Council.
b. Nominations will be submitted using the Mayor’s Award Nomination Form which will be available on the employee intranet or in the Human Resources Division. Additional supporting documentation, such as correspondence relating to the employee’s performance, could also be attached.
c. All completed nomination forms will need to be submitted to Human Resources by October 1 to begin the selection
process.
4. Selection:
a. Received nominations will be reviewed by the Management Team. If a member of the Management Team is nominated, that person will be excluded from the review process.
b. The Management Team will recommend three to five
“finalist” nominees for the City Council Ad-Hoc committee to review.
c. The Ad-Hoc committee, comprised of the Mayor and Mayor Pro- Tem, will select one employee or group of employees from the finalist group who they feel best exemplifies the established criteria.
5. Recognition:
a. The finalist selected shall be recognized at a City Council meeting during the month of December.
b. The award recipient(s) shall receive the following as a result of being selected:
i. Certificate of Recognition from the City Council
ii. A City plaque
iii. $250 gift card to a Lake Forest business or restaurant
Attachment 2
Certificate of Achievement
Mayor’s Award
Recipient
The Lake Forest City Council
recognizes
Employee Name
In gratitude of exemplary service to the
City of Lake Forest.
Mark Tettemer
Mayor
Scott Voigts
Mayor Pro Tem
Robert Pequeño
Council Member
Doug Cirbo
Council Member
Benjamin Yu
Council Member
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
SUBJECT:
SERVICE AWARDS
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Present Employee Service Awards to those present.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On June 4, 2002, the City Council established the Employee Service Award Program based upon years of service. All City of Lake Forest employees are eligible for the program, apart from contract and temporary employees. This evening, the City recognizes seventeen (17) employees for their years of service to the City of Lake Forest. As part of the recognition program, employees receive $100 for each five-year service milestone ($20 per year).
Name
Title
Hire Date
Service
Award
Eligibility
Maxamillion
Bennett Intern 5/30/2019 5 years
Lisa Berglund City Clerk 9/03/2019 5 years
Justin Kirk Street Maintenance
Administrator 10/07/2019 5 years
Marc Lafuente Records Coordinator 5/21/2019 5 years
Name
Title
Hire Date
Service
Award
Eligibility
Jessica Madrid Recreation
Coordinator 5/30/2019 5 years
Kenneth Pizano Recreation Specialist 7/30/2019 5 years
Jedidiah
Richardson Recreation Leader 5/30/2019 5 years
Carolina Rodriguez Senior Accountant 7/22/2019 5 years
Nidia Ruelas Assistant to the City
Manager 1/28/2019 5 years
Kenneth Sipes Recreation Supervisor 7/11/2019 5 years
Mika Toyooka Management Assistant 8/01/2019 5 years
Courtney Wysocki Senior Recreation
Supervisor 5/28/2019
5 years
William Barry Senior Recreation
Supervisor 12/08/2014 10 years
Christine Groves Administrative Services
Manager 2/03/2014 10 years
Ann Ford Recreation Leader 4/06/2009 15 years
Randy Fiore Senior Permit Technician 6/07/2004 20 years Devin Slaven Environmental Manager 5/17/2004 20 years
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. The appropriate funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Sample Employee Service Award
Initiated By: Mika Toyooka,
Submitted By: Keith Neves, Assistant City Manager
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment 1
Certificate of Appreciation
Five Year
Service Award
The Lake Forest City Council
recognizes
Employee
Title
2019 ~ 2024
In gratitude for five years of dedicated service to the City of Lake Forest.
Mark Tettemer
Mayor
Scott Voigts
Mayor Pro Tem
Robert Pequeño
Council Member
Doug Cirbo
Council Member
Benjamin Yu
Council Member
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:
MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
California Government Code 36934 allows titles of ordinances and resolutions to be waived.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, MPA, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
14 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Forest held Tuesday, November 19, 2024, at the Lake Forest City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California, was called to order at 6:30 p.m. with all members present.
ROLL CALL:
Council Members:
Doug Cirbo
Robert Pequeño
Benjamin Yu
Mayor Pro Tem: Scott Voigts
Mayor: Mark Tettemer
City Manager: Debra Rose
City Attorney: Matthew E. Richardson
City Clerk: Lisa Berglund
INVOCATION: The Invocation was provided by David Ludden, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of our Country was led by Girl Scout Brownie Troop #1525.
PRESENTATIONS: (Item No. 1)
1. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OC GO (Measure M)
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Executive Director of Planning Kia Mortazavi provided a presentation. Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed concerns with various OCTA projects. Council questions were asked and answered.
ACTION: The presentation was received and filed.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Brian McMillan expressed concerns with the Code Enforcement Division, City Attorney, and City Manager’s office. He urged for cooperation between the City and businesses.
Margie Lancaster provided information on the Elf Yourself 5K event hosted by the Lake Forest Chamber of Commerce.
November 19, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 5
Andrew O’Connor expressed concerns with City Manager Rose, Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, and Council Member Yu. He requested written reports for conferences attended by Council members.
Bob Holtzclaw expressed concerns with Mayor Pro Tem Voigts.
CONSENT CALENDAR: (Item Nos. 2 – 7)
STATEMENTS READ INTO THE RECORD:
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts: There are warrants on the register to the County of Orange. I am an employee of the County of Orange, but I do not work for the department that generated the warrants. Because the County of Orange is a public agency and because I do not work for the departments in question, I have determined that I have a non-interest in these warrants and will vote on this item.
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Yu, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2, and 5 – 7. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
2. MOTION TO WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
ACTION: Said Ordinances and Resolutions which appeared on the public agenda were determined to have been read by title and further reading was waived.
5. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR NON-ARTERIAL STREETS ASPHALT REPAIRS ZONE D (24S01A)
ACTION: 1. Contract documents for construction of Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A) were approved. 2. A contract in the amount of $2,257,700.00, was awarded to LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp. 3. All other bids received were rejected and return of the bid bonds upon receipt of the executed contract documents from LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp was authorized. 4. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the contract with LCR Earthwork & Engineering Corp.
6. SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CARLSON STRATEGIC LAND SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT
IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
ACTION: 1. The Sixth Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Carlson Strategic Land Solutions, Inc. was approved. 2. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the Sixth Amendment substantially in the form attached.
November 19, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 3 of 5
7. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC.
ACTION: 1. The Second Amendment to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement for Traffic Engineering Services with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc. was approved. 2. The Mayor was authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest the Second Amendment with Hartzog and Crabill, Inc., substantially in the form attached.
ITEMS REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION: (Item Nos. 3 – 4)
MOTION: It was moved by Council Member Yu, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 3 – 4. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
3. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024
Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed concerns with various City Council comments made at the November 5, 2024, meeting.
ACTION: The minutes were approved as submitted.
4. CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed concerns with various payments made.
ACTION: The warrant register in the amount of $6,951,641.59 was approved.
DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS: (Item Nos. 8 – 9)
8. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Traffic Engineering Manager Tran to provide a presentation. Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed concerns with the ordinance. Council questions were asked and answered.
MOTION: It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Voigts, seconded by Council Member Yu, to: 1. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance entitled: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, November 19, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 4 of 5
AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
9. PROTECTED-PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN PHASING PROJECT - PHASE 2 (24T02)
City Manager Rose introduced this item and invited Traffic Engineering Manager Tran to provide a presentation. Andrew O’Connor offered public comment and expressed concerns with the costs of the agreement. City Council questions were asked and answered.
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts made a motion to approve staff recommendations.
Council Member Yu seconded the motion. Mayor Tettemer made a substitute motion to continue the item until February 2026. Council Member Pequeño seconded the motion.
MOTION: It was moved by Mayor Tettemer, seconded by Council Member Pequeño, to continue the item to February 2026. The motion was carried by a vote of 5-0.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: City Manager Rose had nothing further to report.
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Council Member Cirbo:
Council Member Cirbo reported on his attendance at
the Veteran’s Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial and
wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
Council Member Pequeño:
Council Member Pequeño thanked staff for all their
hard work. He reported on his attendance at the
Chamber of Commerce Business Luncheon and the
Veteran’s Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial. He
recognized Orange County Sheriff’s Department
Deputy Froome and congratulated him on his
retirement.
Council Member Yu:
Council Member Yu reported on his attendance at the
Veteran’s Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial. He
complimented his colleagues and wished everyone a
Happy Thanksgiving.
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts:
Mayor Pro Tem Voigts reported on his attendance at
the Veteran’s Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial, a
Veteran’s Day event at the Orange County Rescue
November 19, 2024 LAKE FOREST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 5 of 5
Mission, the Chamber of Commerce Business
Luncheon, the grand re-opening of the Mercedes-
Benz dealership in Foothill Ranch, and the grand
opening of Gameday Men’s Health. He wished
everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
Mayor Tettemer:
Mayor Tettemer reported on his attendance at the
Veteran’s Day ceremony at El Toro Memorial, the
Chamber of Commerce Business Luncheon, the Lake
Forest Leadership Academy graduation, and the
grand re-opening of the Mercedes-Benz dealership in
Foothill Ranch, and the grand opening of Red Shift
Coffee and Gameday Men’s Health. He wished
everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Meeting of the City Council was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
APPROVED:
LISA BERGLUND MARK TETTEMER
CITY CLERK MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: Finance
SUBJECT:
CERTIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Approve the warrant register in the amount of $7,048,708.73.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In accordance with Government Code Section 37202 and Lake Forest Municipal Code Chapter 3.16, the official below certifies that 1) the invoices of the warrant register have been properly reviewed and 2) funds are available for payment of the warrants.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amount of the warrant register is $7,048,708.73
ATTACHMENTS:
Warrant Register
Submitted By: Kevin Shirah, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
Attachment
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 1 of 17
Check Report
City of Lake Forest By Check Number
Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Bank Code: OP-Operating
Payment Type: Manual
THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 11/01/2024 112001,269.10Manual 0.00 11200 Invoice 11/01/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11200 PPE 10/25/2024 1,269.100.00 THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 11/01/2024 112012,143.13Manual 0.00 11201 Invoice 11/01/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11201 PPE 10/25/2024 2,143.130.00 THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 11/01/2024 11202699.12Manual 0.00 11202 Invoice 11/01/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11202 PPE 10/25/2024 699.120.00 THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 11/15/2024 1120354.48Manual 0.00 11203 Invoice 11/15/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11203 PPE 11/08/2024 54.480.00 THB000000 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL CHECK 11/15/2024 11204661.71Manual 0.00 11204 Invoice 11/15/2024 LIVE ADP CHECK 11204 PPE 11/08/2024 661.710.00 4,827.54Total Manual: 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 2 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Payment Type: EFT
10042 ASSURED TELEMATICS INC 11/04/2024 100001344.20EFT 0.00 137586 Invoice 10/17/2024 Fleet GPS October 344.200.00
344.20Total EFT: 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 3 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Payment Type: Regular
10001 ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/07/2024 804852754.43Regular 0.00 2410041-IN Invoice 10/31/2024 5 MONITORS FOR NEW HIRE 754.430.00 10852 ACCESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 11/07/2024 80485310,238.72Regular 0.00 16777-4 Invoice 11/07/2024 DUGOUT LIGHT REPAIR OCT 2024 HEROES… 4,168.480.00 16819-4 Invoice 11/07/2024 PARK LIGHTS CIRCUIT 3 REPAIR OCT 2024 … 5,013.200.00 16849-2 Invoice 11/07/2024 GFI REPLACEMENTS FOR FARMERS MARK… 1,057.040.00 10006 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 11/07/2024 804854277.52Regular 0.00 1094234588 Invoice 11/07/2024 LFSP SECURITY INSTALLATION SERVICE 214.420.00 1094234658 Invoice 11/07/2024 LFSP SECURITY INSTALLATION & SERVICE 59.000.00 1094852872 Invoice 11/07/2024 LFSP SECURITY INSTALLATION SERVICE 4.100.00 10016 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 11/07/2024 804855648,369.02Regular 0.00 PROG PAYMENT 4 Invoice 11/07/2024 2024-004 TRABUCO REHAB, ASCENSION … 648,369.020.00 10017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 11/07/2024 80485642,519.47Regular 0.00 95143 Invoice 11/07/2024 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 8/18 - 8/31 22,404.300.00 96223 Invoice 11/07/2024 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 9/29-10/12 20,115.170.00 10023 AMAZING TENTS & EVENTS 11/07/2024 804857723.75Regular 0.00 8573 Invoice 11/07/2024 SPOOKTACULAR RENTALS 10/26 723.750.00 11256 AMERICAN BIKE PATROL SERVICES 11/07/2024 8048582,596.00Regular 0.00 144722 Invoice 11/07/2024 E-BIKE TRAINING 10/23 2,596.000.00 10028 AMERINAT 11/07/2024 8048591,007.67Regular 0.00
LPM-24-001908 Invoice 11/07/2024 REHAB MONTHLY FEES SEP 2024 1,007.670.00 10028 AMERINAT 11/07/2024 804860456.00Regular 0.00
FS-5890 Invoice 11/07/2024 REHAB LOAN FEES - GLAZER & HOSTO 456.000.00 10038 ARCADIAN BANK 11/07/2024 80486115,000.00Regular 0.00 GLAZER 10/08/2… Invoice 11/07/2024 REHAB LOAN - FEES GLAZER 15,000.000.00 10561 ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 11/07/2024 804862364.08Regular 0.00 3831 Invoice 11/07/2024 ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - SU… 364.080.00 10052 BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 11/07/2024 804863133,581.32Regular 0.00 24266 Invoice 11/07/2024 2023-077 STREET NAME PROJECT OCT 20… 94,157.820.00 24504 Invoice 11/07/2024 2023-031 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT RESPON… 23,380.000.00 24505 Invoice 11/07/2024 TRFFC SGNL MAINT RESP / ENCRCH PRMT … 8,330.000.00 24506 Invoice 11/07/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT ROUTINE SEP 2024 7,713.500.00 10569 BLACK O'DOWD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 11/07/2024 8048641,200.00Regular 0.00 23-3005-3REV Invoice 11/07/2024 HVAC DESIGN & SUPPORT OCT 2024 LFSP 1,200.000.00 10967 BRUCE E MIHELICH INC 11/07/2024 8048653,857.00Regular 0.00 W 62156 Invoice 11/07/2024 FORD MAVERICK LIGHT BAR INSTALLATION 1,928.500.00 W 62157 Invoice 11/07/2024 FORD MAVERICK LIGHT BAR INSTALLATION 1,928.500.00 10074 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT 11/07/2024 804866147.70Regular 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 REMIT ID 200000002413681 SDU/TRIBAL … 147.700.00 10079 CALPERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM 11/07/2024 804867238.85Regular 0.00 15469852 Invoice 11/07/2024 EE CONT PPE 11/08/2024 238.850.00 10081 CAMINO HEALTH CENTER 11/07/2024 8048683,525.00Regular 0.00 1ST Q 2025 IPC Invoice 11/07/2024 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR INDIGENT P… 3,525.000.00 10494 CASSANDRA SAINDON 11/07/2024 804869240.00Regular 0.00 SEPT/OCT 2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 EMPLOYEE WELLNESS CLASS SEP/OCT 240.000.00 10095 CITY OF LAKE FOREST SUNSHINE CLUB 11/07/2024 804870165.00Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 4 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 EE CONT PPE 10/25/2024 165.000.00 10523 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 11/07/2024 80487133,600.00Regular 0.00 L241697001 Invoice 11/07/2024 INTERIM BILLING FIN STMTS, STREET RPT, … 33,600.000.00 10108 COUNTY OF ORANGE 11/07/2024 804872-176,482.12Regular 0.00 10108 COUNTY OF ORANGE 11/07/2024 804872176,482.12Regular 0.00 PW250149 Invoice 11/07/2024 ANNUAL COPERMITEE COSTS 176,482.120.00 10109 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER TAX 11/07/2024 8048731,778,194.32Regular 0.00 SH 69783 Invoice 11/07/2024 AFIS FINGERPRINT OCT 2024 2,605.000.00 SH 69838 Invoice 11/07/2024 LAW ENFORCEMENT NOV 2024 1,775,589.320.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 11/07/2024 8048742,358.65Regular 0.00 3352 Invoice 11/07/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8991 COMM… 368.490.00 3353 Invoice 11/07/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7644 COMM… 654.490.00 3354 Invoice 11/07/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7871 PAC 413.600.00 3355 Invoice 11/07/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8582 PAC 413.600.00 3356 Invoice 11/07/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7711 COMM… 368.490.00 3357 Invoice 11/07/2024 EXTRA CLEANING FOR HALLOWEEN EVENT… 139.980.00 11345 CUTBERTO CRUZ 11/07/2024 804875500.00Regular 0.00 2003239.021 Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7644 500.000.00 THB001216 DEVIN E SLAVEN 11/07/2024 8048761,281.03Regular 0.00 10/20 - 10/23 Invoice 11/07/2024 EXP REIMB CASQA 10/20 -10/23 1,281.030.00 10489 ECS IMAGING INC 11/07/2024 80487734,900.00Regular 0.00 18983 Invoice 11/07/2024 ECS LASERFICHE ANNUAL RENEWAL 30,100.000.00 19162 Invoice 11/07/2024 ECS IMAGING ADDITIONAL STORAGE 4,800.000.00 10151 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF OC 11/07/2024 8048781,538.45Regular 0.00 1ST QTR 2025 CD… Invoice 09/30/2024 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR LF FHC ED &… 1,538.450.00 10152 FAMILIES FORWARD 11/07/2024 8048795,636.30Regular 0.00 CDBG 1ST QTR 2… Invoice 11/07/2024 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT1ST QTR 2025 REIMB… 5,636.300.00 10153 FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES 11/07/2024 8048802,300.00Regular 0.00 1ST QTR 2025 H… Invoice 11/07/2024 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 1ST QTR 2025 HHP 2,300.000.00 10164 FOOTHILL ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 11/07/2024 80488150.00Regular 0.00 161892 Invoice 11/07/2024 RESPONSIBLE PET PROGRAM MIMI 50.000.00 10179 HARTZOG & CRABILL INC 11/07/2024 80488218,470.60Regular 0.00 24-0688 Invoice 11/07/2024 2020-077 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEV / CIP… 18,470.600.00 10181 HDL COREN & CONE 11/07/2024 8048835,312.50Regular 0.00 SIN044252 Invoice 11/07/2024 2ND QTR 24/25 CONTRACT SRVCS - PROP… 5,312.500.00 11344 IDA HUMPHREY 11/07/2024 804884450.00Regular 0.00
2003237.021 Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8733 450.000.00 10199 JACOB GREEN 11/07/2024 8048853,685.00Regular 0.00 2723 Invoice 11/07/2024 LHMP CONSULTING SERVICES SEP 2024 3,685.000.00 10200 JAMES L BLACKBURN 11/07/2024 804886416.67Regular 0.00 33077 Invoice 11/07/2024 NOTICES OF WARNING 416.670.00
11291 JOE A GONSALVES & SON 11/07/2024 8048877,500.00Regular 0.00 162007 Invoice 11/07/2024 STATE LOBBYING SERVICES 7,500.000.00 10223 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 11/07/2024 804888504.28Regular 0.00 9010155003 Invoice 11/07/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR 24 HP PRINTERS SEP 504.280.00 10224 KONICA MINOLTA PREMIER FINANCE 11/07/2024 8048891,011.43Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 5 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 83189388 Invoice 11/07/2024 LEASE FOR 8 KONICA COPIERS NOV 2024 1,011.430.00 10735 KPRS CONSTUCTION SERVICES INC 11/07/2024 8048903,750.00Regular 0.00 COMB-06-23-607…Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 3,750.000.00 11346 MIKE HOLLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC 11/07/2024 80489112,450.00Regular 0.00 RESB-03-23-59560 Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 6,225.000.00 RESB-03-23-59561 Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 6,225.000.00 10468 MISSIONSQUARE 11/07/2024 80489211,144.35Regular 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 DEFERRED COMP ACCT 303669 PPE 10/25… 11,144.350.00 THB004892 NICOLE HOUSTON 11/07/2024 804893815.43Regular 0.00 11/15/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 COBRA PREMIUM - DECEMBER 2024 815.430.00 THB001838 NIDIA RUELAS 11/07/2024 804894189.61Regular 0.00 10/09 - 10/11 Invoice 11/07/2024 MILEAGE REIMB CJPIA 10/09 - 10/11 148.740.00 10/16 - 10/18 Invoice 11/07/2024 MILEAGE REIMB CALCITIES ANNUAL CONF… 40.870.00 10265 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 11/07/2024 804895223,236.94Regular 0.00 79078 Invoice 11/07/2024 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE OCT PASSIVE P… 73,736.270.00 79079 Invoice 11/07/2024 MP / SLOPES MONTHLY MAINT OCT 87,261.670.00 79141 Invoice 11/07/2024 INSTLL PLNT MATRL & MLCH OCT LAKE FO… 12,240.000.00 79285 Invoice 11/04/2024 2023-055 INSTLL PLNT MATRL&MLCH OCT… 8,100.000.00 79331 Invoice 11/07/2024 INSTALL MULCH OCT MUIRLANDS / RIDGE… 11,490.000.00 79335 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEPT 2024 LAKE FOR… 491.000.00 79336 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEPT 2024 RIDGE RO… 444.000.00 79337 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEPT 2024 ROCKFIEL… 411.000.00 79338 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS SEPT 2024 TRABUCO/… 345.000.00 79339 Invoice 11/07/2024 INSTALL TREES ON MEDIAN OCT 2024 EL … 184.000.00 79340 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 MUIRLAN… 489.000.00 79341 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 LAKE FORE… 505.000.00 79342 Invoice 11/07/2024 INSTALL TREES OCT 2024 ALTON+CHERRY … 184.000.00 79344 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 TRABUCO/… 96.000.00 79345 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 LAKE FORE… 143.000.00 79346 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 RIDGE RO… 690.000.00 79347 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 JERONIMO… 345.000.00 79348 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 JERONIMO… 414.000.00 79371 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 EL TORO/… 2,968.000.00 79372 Invoice 11/07/2024 INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL OCT 2024 RAN… 13,150.000.00 79373 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 PITTSFORD… 1,485.000.00 79374 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 PEACHW… 1,012.000.00 79375 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 MONTBUR… 1,289.000.00 79376 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 EL TORO P… 4,195.000.00 79377 Invoice 11/07/2024 IRRIGATION REPAIRS OCT 2024 MOUNTAI… 1,385.000.00 79400 Invoice 11/07/2024 INSTALL TREES OCT 2024 DARRIN/RINGAT… 184.000.00 10273 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 11/07/2024 804897243.00Regular 0.00 84720992 Invoice 11/07/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL CHECKS 189.000.00 84797276 Invoice 11/07/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL TESTING 54.000.00 10274 OCEAN BLUE ENVIRONMENTAL 11/07/2024 804898876.00Regular 0.00 40378 Invoice 11/07/2024 BIOHAZARDOUS WASTE 08/21 DR-24-028… 876.000.00 11304 OPPENHEIMER NATIONAL 11/07/2024 80489944,579.13Regular 0.00 2 Invoice 11/07/2024 2024-029 DRAINAGE OCT CIVIC CENTER 44,579.130.00 10280 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE 11/07/2024 804900135.44Regular 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 LOF NO. 30-2019-01097622-CL-CL-CJC PPE… 135.440.00 THB001588 PETER MEIER 11/07/2024 804901806.20Regular 0.00 10/20 - 10/23 Invoice 11/07/2024 EXP REIMB CASQA HOTEL 10/20 - 10/23 806.200.00 11347 RANDY D ROGERS 11/07/2024 8049026,250.00Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 6 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 1704 Invoice 11/07/2024 STAGE FLOORING DEEP CLEANED AUG PAC 6,250.000.00 10925 SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY 11/07/2024 80490316,053.47Regular 0.00 15486 Invoice 11/07/2024 FTE OCT 2024 LIFE/STD/LTD 6,964.570.00 B0FSYL DENTAL Invoice 11/07/2024 FTE DENTAL PREMIUM OCT 2024 7,279.500.00 B0FSYL VISION Invoice 11/07/2024 FTE VISION PREMIUM OCT 2024 1,809.400.00 11343 SHARON KAY 11/07/2024 80490413.00Regular 0.00
11343 Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND PICKLEBALL INTERMEDIATE #128… 13.000.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11/07/2024 8049055,503.07Regular 0.00 3725 10/17/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 PARK UTILITIES OCT 2024 5,503.070.00 11342 SQUARE SIGNS LLC 11/07/2024 8049061,679.07Regular 0.00 00086164 Invoice 11/07/2024 DEPOSIT - SPECIAL EVENTS SIGN 1,679.070.00 10641 THE LOFTCRAFTERS INC 11/07/2024 804907720.00Regular 0.00 RES-06-24-64297 Invoice 11/07/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 720.000.00 10363 THE PRINTERY INC 11/07/2024 8049081,099.77Regular 0.00 142706 Invoice 11/07/2024 SMP POSTCARDS PRINTING 1,099.770.00 10376 TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 11/07/2024 804909897.75Regular 0.00 13273 Invoice 11/07/2024 A/V 8691 897.750.00
10390 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 11/07/2024 80491068,666.09Regular 0.00 4348 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 CAL-CARD PURCHASES OCT 52,144.860.00 6249 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 CAL-CARD PURCHASES OCT 16,521.230.00 10391 US BANK PARS 11/07/2024 8049113,007.47Regular 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 PARS CONT PPE 10/25/2024 3,007.470.00 10392 US DEPT OF TREASURY 11/07/2024 804912950.62Regular 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 AGENCY TRACKING WG2122418 PPE 10/2… 950.620.00 10398 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/07/2024 8049132,013.70Regular 0.00 9976754441 Invoice 11/07/2024 CELLULAR PHONES & DATA SERVICE 9/13 -… 2,013.700.00 10405 VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS INC 11/07/2024 8049142,326.57Regular 0.00 8690611272443 Invoice 11/07/2024 CITY VEHICLE FUEL OCT 2024 2,326.570.00 10932 WEX HEALTH INC 11/07/2024 804915278.20Regular 0.00 0002038152-IN Invoice 11/07/2024 ADMIN WEX SEPT 2024 FEES 278.200.00 10450 WHITE MECHANICAL INC 11/07/2024 8049161,261.67Regular 0.00 24-3056 Invoice 11/07/2024 AC, SMK DTCTR, NTFYR REPAIR OCT LFSP 1,261.670.00 10491 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 11/07/2024 8049176,700.00Regular 0.00 00714297 Invoice 11/07/2024 CDBG CONSULTING SEP 2024 6,700.000.00 10481 YIFTEE INC 11/07/2024 804918565,000.00Regular 0.00 11/04/2024 Invoice 11/07/2024 BOGO PHASE 9 565,000.000.00 11219 360 GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LLC 11/14/2024 80491920,000.00Regular 0.00 1008 Invoice 11/14/2024 WEBSITE HOSTING OCT 2024 - SEP 2025 20,000.000.00 10001 ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/14/2024 80492037,976.71Regular 0.00 2410029-IN Invoice 11/14/2024 COMPUTER HARDWARE WARRANTY 855.250.00 2410030-IN Invoice 11/14/2024 COMPUTER HARDWARE WARRANTY 283.910.00 2410077-IN Invoice 11/14/2024 LAPTOP FOR PUBLIC WORKS SENIOR ANAL… 3,922.550.00 405062S-IN Invoice 11/14/2024 SPORTS PARK NETWORK ENHANCEMENT -… 165.000.00 W205487-IN Invoice 11/14/2024 COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES NOV 2024 32,750.000.00 11353 ALL STATES ENGINEERING 11/14/2024 804921868.00Regular 0.00 11/07/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND DESPOIT FOR AVL 868.000.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 7 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 11351 ANGELINA OLAES 11/14/2024 804922200.00Regular 0.00 2003250.21 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8106 200.000.00 10044 AT&T CALNET3 11/14/2024 80492361.50Regular 0.00
000022502779 Invoice 11/14/2024 PARK UTILITIES 6157 OCT 2024 61.500.00 10047 AWARD CREATIONS 11/14/2024 80492420.11Regular 0.00 2024-1057 Invoice 11/14/2024 NAME BADGE FOR COMMISSIONER T BRU… 20.110.00 10062 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 11/14/2024 8049253,625.00Regular 0.00 9102426 Invoice 11/14/2024 2021-040 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OCT… 3,625.000.00 10091 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC 11/14/2024 804926122,365.05Regular 0.00 68032 Invoice 11/14/2024 STREET MAINT/TACO CONFIS/CATCH BASI… 122,365.050.00 10109 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER TAX 11/14/2024 804927176,482.12Regular 0.00 PW250149 Invoice 11/14/2024 NPDES ANNUAL COST SHARE FY 2024-2025 176,482.120.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 11/27/2024 804928-8,478.37Regular 0.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 11/14/2024 8049288,478.37Regular 0.00 11152 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL MONTHLY SERVICE NOV 2024 5,485.000.00 3358 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES COMM CTR 10/29 1,015.590.00 3359 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8737 PAC 10… 413.600.00 3360 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES PERMIT 8656 PAC 1… 413.600.00 3361 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7871 PAC 11… 413.600.00 3362 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7004 COMM… 368.490.00 3363 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8106 COMM… 368.490.00 10804 DAVID VOLZ DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC11/14/2024 8049295,710.00Regular 0.00 422848 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-013 LACROSSE PROJCT JUL 24 FOOTH… 5,710.000.00 10139 ELENA SALISBURY 11/14/2024 8049306,146.00Regular 0.00 12686 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 553.000.00 12688 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1,505.000.00 12689 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 689.500.00 12690 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1,655.500.00 12691 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 973.000.00 12693 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 616.000.00 12694 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 56.000.00 12695 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 14.000.00 12696 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 42.000.00 12698 Invoice 11/14/2024 FALL 24/25 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 42.000.00 10141 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 11/14/2024 8049314,367.00Regular 0.00 L0058761936 Invoice 11/14/2024 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 7/1 - 9/30 2… 4,367.000.00 11228 ENERGUY 11/14/2024 80493270.19Regular 0.00
RMECH-08-24-64… Invoice 11/14/2024 PERMIT CANCELLATION 70.190.00 10148 EVERBRIDGE INC 11/14/2024 80493314,466.00Regular 0.00 M84672 Invoice 11/14/2024 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION 14,466.000.00 11349 FARIBA SHOKOOHY 11/14/2024 804934750.00Regular 0.00 RESB-05-23-60436 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND C&D DEPOSIT 750.000.00 10496 GEOGRAPHICS 11/14/2024 8049354,699.75Regular 0.00 24-23921 Invoice 11/14/2024 LEAFLET DESIGN WINTER 2025 4,699.750.00 11354 GRIFFITHS RANCH, LLC 11/14/2024 8049364,092.15Regular 0.00 11/07/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND CEQA DEPOSIT 4,092.150.00 10184 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 11/14/2024 8049376,769.39Regular 0.00 SIN044508 Invoice 11/14/2024 2ND QTR 24/25 CONTRACT & AUDIT SRVC… 6,769.390.00 10454 INNOVATIVE CLEANING SERVICES INC 11/14/2024 80493832,383.63Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 8 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 31352 Invoice 11/14/2024 2022-027 JANITORIAL SERVICES OCT 2024… 32,383.630.00 10194 INTERWEST CONSULTING 11/14/2024 80493943,990.64Regular 0.00 680430 Invoice 11/14/2024 BLDG & SAFETY SERVICES SEP 2024 40,709.560.00 731798 Invoice 11/14/2024 BLDG BO NON-PERMIT SERVICES SEP 2024 2,101.120.00 933382 Invoice 11/14/2024 BLDG NON-PERMIT SERVICES SEP 2024 1,179.960.00 10195 IP VIDEO SPECIALISTS 11/14/2024 804940199.00Regular 0.00 7825 Invoice 11/14/2024 SKATE PARK WEBCAM NOV 2024 199.000.00 10203 JAMEY CLARK INC 11/14/2024 8049418,720.78Regular 0.00 75643 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-047 SNACK BAR REPAIR OCT 2024 LF… 635.730.00 75658 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-047 MENS RSTRM SENSOR OCT 2024… 329.300.00 75670 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-047 SPRING TOY/STEERNG WHL NOV… 3,794.440.00 75671 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-047 ORDERED/INSTALLD 2 BACKBO… 3,961.310.00 10448 KARI HALL DBA OC PARTY COMPANY 11/14/2024 8049421,275.00Regular 0.00 00001350 Invoice 11/14/2024 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA 12/7 1,275.000.00 10495 KONICA MINOLTA 11/14/2024 8049431,148.22Regular 0.00 1206846 Invoice 11/14/2024 LEASE BUYOUT FOR KONICA MINOLTA C3… 1,148.220.00 10223 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 11/14/2024 8049441,114.58Regular 0.00 296707484 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 2A 134.570.00 296707558 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 BUI… 208.830.00 296707560 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 POL… 61.060.00 296707564 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 SP… 76.020.00 296707753 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 1A 260.840.00 296708025 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 2B 47.780.00 296708135 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 SEN… 230.200.00 296708136 Invoice 11/14/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT 2024 CITY… 95.280.00 10224 KONICA MINOLTA PREMIER FINANCE 11/14/2024 8049452,135.10Regular 0.00 20068436 Invoice 11/14/2024 LEASE BUYOUT FOR 8 KONICA COPIERS 2,135.100.00 10226 L & M AUTOMOTIVE 11/14/2024 8049461,819.89Regular 0.00 55821 Invoice 11/14/2024 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2006 DODGE PIC… 576.650.00 56090 Invoice 11/14/2024 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2016 CHEVY COL… 319.950.00 56140 Invoice 11/14/2024 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2015 CHEVY COL… 923.290.00 10229 LAKE FOREST EXPRESS WASH 11/14/2024 804947120.00Regular 0.00 1107 2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 VEHICLE WASH SEP 2024 60.000.00 1108 2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 VEHICLE WASH OCT 2024 60.000.00 10478 LOCAL AGENCY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC 11/14/2024 804948317.50Regular 0.00 24-550 Invoice 11/14/2024 2022-075 ARTERIAL SLURRY OCT 2024 PW… 317.500.00 10235 LOOPNET 11/14/2024 804949356.00Regular 0.00
120921586-1 Invoice 11/14/2024 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES NOW (FRONT-… 356.000.00 11350 LOUISE MARIE CORNILLEZ 11/14/2024 804950300.00Regular 0.00 2003248.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 PERMIT 8946 300.000.00
10250 MONOGRAM MAGIC 11/14/2024 804951121.02Regular 0.00 13463 Invoice 11/14/2024 S VOIGTS COUNCIL JACKETS AND HATS 121.020.00 10254 MTR HORTICULTURE INC 11/14/2024 8049523,225.00Regular 0.00 9-9-24 Invoice 11/14/2024 2023-075 QRTRLY INSPECTION PLM TREES… 3,225.000.00 10304 RAMIRO ACEVEDO 11/14/2024 804953106,370.62Regular 0.00 2024-62 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-091 STREET SIDEWALK REPAIR 2023-… 93,496.620.00 2024-63 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-026 RIDGE ROUTE MEDIAN IMPROV… 12,874.000.00 10305 RANCHO VIEJO II HOA 11/14/2024 8049541,089.00Regular 0.00 22702 11/04/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 22702 MADRID HOA PAYMENT DEC PTM-… 544.500.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 9 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 22706 Invoice 11/14/2024 22706 MADRID HOA PAYMENT DEC PTM-… 544.500.00 11044 RONALD A SAGONA 11/14/2024 804955315.00Regular 0.00 108353 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-09 BACKFLOW TESTING PEACHWD/… 270.000.00 108354 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-09 BACKFLOW TESTING ROCKFIELD/… 45.000.00 11348 SADDLEBACK WINDOW REPLACEMENTS 11/14/2024 804956188.19Regular 0.00 RESB-07-24-64476 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND CANCELLED PERMIT 188.190.00 10319 SAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 11/14/2024 8049579,090.00Regular 0.00 4940 Invoice 11/14/2024 CEQA CONSULTING SDP 04-24-5698 (IMI) … 9,090.000.00 10611 SCOTT VOIGTS 11/14/2024 8049581,815.48Regular 0.00 09/15 - 09/19 Invoice 11/14/2024 EXP REIMB ACC-OC ADVOCACY TRIP 1,815.480.00 10729 SHEED FILM LLC 11/14/2024 8049591,165.00Regular 0.00 2003255.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8656 70.000.00 2003256.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8656 1,095.000.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11/14/2024 804960874.33Regular 0.00 1549 11/01/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 PARK UTILITIES OCT 2024 (PORTOLA PARK) 157.730.00 6551 10/29/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 PARK UTILITIES (2) OCT 2024 716.600.00 10505 STUDIO TWO BLACK DIAMOND PRINTING & GRAPHICS11/14/2024 804961380.36Regular 0.00 101884 Invoice 11/14/2024 BUSINESS CARDS - JIN, CARDENAS 170.250.00 101911 Invoice 11/14/2024 BUSINESS CARDS - MADRID, HOSSAIN, KIM 210.110.00 11352 SUJAY PARANJAPE 11/14/2024 804962340.00Regular 0.00 2003252.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8582 340.000.00 10347 SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES INC 11/14/2024 8049639,203.33Regular 0.00 18242 Invoice 11/14/2024 2023-022 PRSSR WSH, GRFFT RMVL, STM … 9,203.330.00 10902 TESLA 11/14/2024 804964327.21Regular 0.00
RESB-05-24-63838 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND CANCELLED PERMIT 327.210.00 10365 THERESA DOBBS 11/14/2024 8049651,845.00Regular 0.00 11/04/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 CONSULTING SERVICES OCT 2024 1,845.000.00 10916 TONYA WHITESIDE 11/14/2024 80496650.00Regular 0.00 2003251.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8877 50.000.00 10372 TRABUCO CANYON WATER DISTRICT 11/14/2024 804967309.93Regular 0.00 10/22/2024 Invoice 11/14/2024 MPS UTILITIES EL TORO/PORTOLA SEP 2024 309.930.00 10376 TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 11/14/2024 804968288.75Regular 0.00 13390 Invoice 11/14/2024 A/V CITY COUNCIL 288.750.00
10385 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 11/14/2024 804969202.40Regular 0.00 1020240388 Invoice 11/14/2024 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OCT 2024… 202.400.00 11276 UNITED RIGGERS & ERECTORS INC 11/14/2024 80497059,987.00Regular 0.00 53221 Invoice 11/14/2024 GAZEBO SHEHER REHAB OCT 2024 RIMGA… 59,987.000.00 10865 VINAS SUJANTHAN 11/14/2024 804971500.00Regular 0.00 2003253.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7871 500.000.00 10865 VINAS SUJANTHAN 11/14/2024 804972200.00Regular 0.00 2003249.021 Invoice 11/14/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7804 200.000.00 11355 VSS INTERNATIONAL, INC 11/14/2024 804973925,038.47Regular 0.00 PROG PAYMENT 1 Invoice 11/14/2024 2024-076 ARTERIAL SLURRY PW2021-05B 925,038.470.00 10410 Z&K CONSULTANTS INC 11/14/2024 80497463,648.00Regular 0.00 2040 Invoice 11/14/2024 2021-073.2 ARTERIAL SLURRY AUG 2024 … 22,336.000.00 2041 Invoice 11/14/2024 2021-073.2 ARTERIAL SLURRY SEP 2024 P… 41,312.000.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 10 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 10000 A SOURCE OF PRIDE 11/21/2024 80497528.93Regular 0.00 9110884 Invoice 11/21/2024 NAMETAGS K ROBBINS 28.930.00 10017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 11/21/2024 80497622,404.30Regular 0.00 96509 Invoice 11/21/2024 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 10/13 - 10/26 22,404.300.00 10873 ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES INC 11/21/2024 80497759,064.85Regular 0.00 18094941 Invoice 11/21/2024 2023-040 STREET SWEEPING OCT 2024 59,064.850.00 10039 ARDURRA GROUP INC 11/21/2024 80497899,243.75Regular 0.00 155954 Invoice 11/21/2024 2021-030 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEP 20… 99,243.750.00 10048 BAGELS & BREW INC 11/21/2024 8049793,258.41Regular 0.00 34375 Invoice 11/21/2024 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA CATERING ORDE… 3,258.410.00 10074 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT 11/21/2024 804980147.70Regular 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 REMIT ID 200000002413681 SDU/TRIBAL … 147.700.00 10079 CALPERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM 11/21/2024 804981238.85Regular 0.00 15489345 Invoice 11/21/2024 EE CONT PPE 11/22/2024 238.850.00 10095 CITY OF LAKE FOREST SUNSHINE CLUB 11/21/2024 804982165.00Regular 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 EE CONT PPE 11/08/2024 165.000.00 10104 CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC 11/21/2024 8049833,054.83Regular 0.00 IN00257212 Invoice 11/21/2024 CCTV MAINTENANCE OCT 2024 3,054.830.00 10107 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 11/21/2024 804984413.63Regular 0.00 121446597 Invoice 11/21/2024 COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES NOW (BACK-E… 413.630.00 10109 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER TAX 11/21/2024 804985127,410.58Regular 0.00 AC2590020 Invoice 11/21/2024 OC ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 7/1 - 9/30… 113,716.080.00 STCS002542 Invoice 11/21/2024 800 MHZ QUARTERLY ALLOCATION 10/1 - … 13,694.500.00 10110 COX COMMUNICATIONS 11/21/2024 8049862,370.52Regular 0.00 3601 11/01/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 TELECOM SERVICES NOV 2024 2,307.730.00 6701 10/27/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 CABLE TV NOV 2024 62.790.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 11/21/2024 8049873,025.76Regular 0.00 3366 Invoice 11/21/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT CITY COMM … 368.490.00 3367 Invoice 11/21/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8440 COMM… 1,015.590.00 3368 Invoice 11/21/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7712 COMM… 859.590.00 3369 Invoice 11/21/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7711 COMM… 368.490.00 3370 Invoice 11/21/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7983 PAC 11… 413.600.00 10412 DASH MEDICAL GLOVES INC 11/21/2024 804988614.88Regular 0.00 INV1319289 Invoice 11/21/2024 SUPPLIES - NITRILE GLOVES 614.880.00 10119 DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 11/21/2024 8049899,433.75Regular 0.00 4475 Invoice 11/21/2024 SIP THROUGH 11/06/2024 9,433.750.00 10123 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 11/21/2024 804990196.00Regular 0.00 17033048 Invoice 11/21/2024 2022-030 LFSP MONTHLY PEST CONTROL … 196.000.00 10179 HARTZOG & CRABILL INC 11/21/2024 80499136,461.26Regular 0.00 24-0689 Invoice 11/21/2024 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEV / CIP AUG 2024 21,444.380.00 24-0690 Invoice 11/21/2024 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEV - CIP SEP 2024 15,016.880.00 11125 ICC GENERAL CODE INC 11/21/2024 804992939.00Regular 0.00 PG000038511 Invoice 11/21/2024 LAKE FOREST MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEM… 939.000.00 10200 JAMES L BLACKBURN 11/21/2024 8049931,393.28Regular 0.00 33160 Invoice 11/21/2024 BUSINESS CARDS 57.760.00
33215 Invoice 11/21/2024 HAND BOOKS 47.550.00
33220 Invoice 11/21/2024 OCSD GIVEAWAYS 1,287.970.00
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 11 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 10853 KIMBERLY DOWNEY ESMOND 11/21/2024 8049941,839.60Regular 0.00 12478 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 100.800.00 12479 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 352.800.00 12481 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 50.400.00 12482 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 441.000.00 12487 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 453.600.00 12488 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 441.000.00 10655 KOSMONT & ASSOCIATES INC 11/21/2024 80499513,582.40Regular 0.00 2405.12-005 Invoice 11/21/2024 KOSMONT RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS 13,582.400.00 10240 MARYAM STEVENSON 11/21/2024 8049962,265.55Regular 0.00 12475 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 831.600.00 12796 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 602.350.00 12797 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 831.600.00 10468 MISSIONSQUARE 11/21/2024 80499711,144.35Regular 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 DEFERRED COMP ACCT 303669 PPE 11,144.350.00 10536 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 11/21/2024 8049981,819.26Regular 0.00 32881718 Invoice 11/21/2024 OPERATING SUPPLIES OCTOBER 2024 1,819.260.00 10280 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE 11/21/2024 804999132.27Regular 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 LOF NO. 30-2019-01097622-CL-CL-CJC PPE 132.270.00 10287 PITNEY BOWES INC 11/21/2024 8050003,659.47Regular 0.00 3106897788 Invoice 11/21/2024 POSTAGE METER LEASE 8/28 - 11/27 2024 3,659.470.00 10304 RAMIRO ACEVEDO 11/21/2024 8050013,550.00Regular 0.00 2024-65 Invoice 11/21/2024 2024-026 RIDGE ROUTE MEDIAN IMP CHG… 3,550.000.00 10477 READWRITE EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC 11/21/2024 8050022,957.50Regular 0.00 12701 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 591.500.00 12702 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 473.200.00 12704 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 591.500.00 12705 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 354.900.00 12707 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 591.500.00 12708 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 354.900.00 10316 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC 11/21/2024 8050036,077.50Regular 0.00 12518 Invoice 11/21/2024 AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSULTING OCT … 6,077.500.00 10324 SHELLY BOOTH 11/21/2024 805004430.50Regular 0.00
12564 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 430.500.00 10325 SHELTERCLEAN SERVICES INC 11/21/2024 8050054,665.80Regular 0.00 791445 Invoice 11/21/2024 2024-042 BUS SHELTER MAINTENANCE O… 4,665.800.00 10329 SO CAL INDUSTRIES 11/21/2024 805006439.99Regular 0.00 716157 Invoice 11/21/2024 NEW WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE PORTABLE… 439.990.00 10335 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11/21/2024 805007121,914.06Regular 0.00 3106 11/04/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 CIVIC CENTER & STREET LIGHT UTILITIES O… 117,125.130.00 5146 11/01/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 STREET LIGHT UTILITIES OCT 2024 74.530.00 8114 11/06/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES OCT 2024 4,714.400.00 11342 SQUARE SIGNS LLC 11/21/2024 8050082,679.08Regular 0.00 00086164-B Invoice 11/21/2024 REMAINING BALANCE - SPECIAL EVENTS S… 2,679.080.00 10359 THE GAS COMPANY 11/21/2024 805009777.94Regular 0.00 9109 11/07/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 CIVIC CENTER UTILITIES OCT 2024 777.940.00 10362 THE PET ADOPTION CENTER OF 11/21/2024 8050101,583.33Regular 0.00 1021 Invoice 11/21/2024 PET ADOPTION CENTER SERVICES OCT 2024 1,583.330.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 12 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 10364 THE UPS STORE 0026 11/21/2024 805011270.00Regular 0.00 TCLF1020240026 Invoice 11/21/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT LIVE SCAN & CERT BAC… 270.000.00 THB004898 TONY VILLEGAS 11/21/2024 80501250.25Regular 0.00 NOV 2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 MILEAGE REIMB IRRIGATION ASSOC CONV… 50.250.00 10370 TOTAL COMPENSATION SYSTEMS INC 11/21/2024 805013855.00Regular 0.00 13770 Invoice 11/21/2024 GASB 75 OPEB EVALUATION SERVICES #1 855.000.00 10376 TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 11/21/2024 8050141,388.63Regular 0.00 13506 Invoice 11/21/2024 AV FOR PAC PERMIT 8737 OCT 1,388.630.00 10391 US BANK PARS 11/21/2024 8050152,967.45Regular 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 PARS CONT PPE 11/08/2024 2,967.450.00 10392 US DEPT OF TREASURY 11/21/2024 805016950.62Regular 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/21/2024 AGENCY TRACKING WG2122418 PPE 11/0… 950.620.00 10932 WEX HEALTH INC 11/21/2024 8050171.40Regular 0.00
0000034008 Invoice 11/21/2024 COBRA PAYMENT NOV 2024 1.400.00 10942 YUKA GARRETT 11/21/2024 805018283.50Regular 0.00
12763 Invoice 11/21/2024 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT FALL 2024 283.500.00 10015 ALH SECURITY INC 11/27/2024 805019225.00Regular 0.00 14270 Invoice 11/27/2024 PROGRAM 10 NEW CODES HEROES PARK … 225.000.00 10017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 11/27/2024 80502020,163.87Regular 0.00 96936 Invoice 11/27/2024 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 10/27 - 11/9 20,163.870.00 10019 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES 11/27/2024 8050213,398.00Regular 0.00 2892680 Invoice 11/27/2024 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE - ELF YOURSEL… 3,398.000.00 10037 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL 11/27/2024 8050226,190.00Regular 0.00 102001 Invoice 11/27/2024 2023-082 LAKE MAINTENANCE VETERANS … 3,095.000.00 102020 Invoice 11/27/2024 2023-082 LAKE MAINTENANCE VETERANS … 3,095.000.00 10044 AT&T CALNET3 11/27/2024 805023244.53Regular 0.00
000022553613 Invoice 11/27/2024 MPS UTILITIES 6257 OCT 2024 153.760.00 000022555533 Invoice 11/27/2024 PARK UTILITIES 6189 OCT 2024 90.770.00 THB001841 BENJAMIN YU 11/27/2024 805024154.23Regular 0.00 11/18/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 EXP REIM CAL CITIES ANNUAL CNF LONG … 154.230.00 10502 BKF ENGINEERS 11/27/2024 8050251,171.75Regular 0.00 24110795 Invoice 11/27/2024 LOS ALISOS/MUIRLANDS 2ND LEFT TURNS… 1,171.750.00 11253 BLUE RASTER LLC 11/27/2024 8050263,100.00Regular 0.00 8860 Invoice 11/27/2024 ASSET MANAGEMENT GIS WORKFLOWS O… 3,100.000.00 10663 BRAD LEE ALLEN 11/27/2024 805027600.00Regular 0.00 12/14/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 TREE LIGHTING ENTERTAINMENT (JUGGLI… 600.000.00 10064 CA ASSOC FOR LOCAL ECONOMIC 11/27/2024 805028839.10Regular 0.00 300005590 Invoice 11/27/2024 CALED MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 2024 A GR… 839.100.00 10447 CALIFORNIA FIRE MUSEUM & SAFETY LEARNING CENTER11/27/2024 805029600.00Regular 0.00 77 Invoice 11/27/2024 2024 TREE LIGHTING ENTERTAINMENT 600.000.00 11332 CAMILA FIELD 11/27/2024 80503014.60Regular 0.00
2003298.021 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND PRINCESS BALLET #12776 14.600.00 10097 CLEARGOV INC 11/27/2024 80503111,539.19Regular 0.00 2024-15484 Invoice 11/27/2024 DGTL BUDGT BK & TRNSPRNCY STE - RNW… 11,539.190.00 10737 COM-POWER CORPORATION 11/27/2024 8050324,947.13Regular 0.00 Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 13 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount SDP 07-20-5368 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND DEPOSIT 4,947.130.00 10904 CREATIVE KIDS PLAYHOUSE 11/27/2024 805033500.00Regular 0.00 2003267.021 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7983 500.000.00 10113 CROWN FACILITY SOLUTIONS 11/27/2024 80503410,400.05Regular 0.00 11152 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL MONTHLY SERVICE NOV 2024 5,485.000.00 3358 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES COMM CTR 10/29 1,015.590.00 3359 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8737 PAC 10… 413.600.00 3360 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES PERMIT 8656 PAC 1… 413.600.00 3361 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7871 PAC 11… 413.600.00 3362 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 7004 COMM… 368.490.00 3363 Invoice 11/14/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICE PERMIT 8106 COMM… 368.490.00 3371 Invoice 11/27/2024 XTRA JNTRL SRVCS FOR SOFTBALL TRNMN… 280.000.00 3374 Invoice 11/27/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES RENTAL CLEANING … 859.590.00 3375 Invoice 11/27/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES RENTAL CLEANING … 368.490.00 3376 Invoice 11/27/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES RENTAL CLEANING … 413.600.00 10123 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 11/27/2024 80503575.00Regular 0.00 17002752 Invoice 11/27/2024 2022-030 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SKAT… 40.000.00 17002754 Invoice 11/27/2024 2022-030 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL HERO… 35.000.00 10126 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 11/27/2024 805036140.80Regular 0.00 Q3 2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 CASP FEE 3RD QTR 2024 140.800.00 10134 ECONOMICS INC 11/27/2024 8050375,779.58Regular 0.00 2022.31 Invoice 11/27/2024 2022-002 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NEW … 5,779.580.00 10489 ECS IMAGING INC 11/27/2024 805038175.00Regular 0.00 19260 Invoice 11/27/2024 PAF DIGITIZATION CHANGE ORDER #2 175.000.00 10163 FLOCK GROUP INC 11/27/2024 80503936,648.63Regular 0.00 INV-26620 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE 36,648.630.00
10170 GMU GEOTECHNICAL INC 11/27/2024 80504021,064.50Regular 0.00 66863 Invoice 11/27/2024 2022-122 ARTERIAL SLURRY (PW2021-05B)… 21,064.500.00 11361 GOVINVEST INC 11/27/2024 8050412,500.00Regular 0.00 2024-5783 Invoice 11/27/2024 ACTUARIAL CONSULTING 2,500.000.00 10623 GRACE CHINESE FELLOWSHIP 11/27/2024 805042300.00Regular 0.00 2003274.021 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8474 300.000.00 10184 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 11/27/2024 805043300.00Regular 0.00 SIN044651 Invoice 11/27/2024 CANNABIS TESTING MNGMT OCT 2024 300.000.00 10917 INTERNATIONAL TRADING CONTACTS LLC 11/27/2024 805044200.00Regular 0.00 1934 Invoice 11/27/2024 ENTERTAINMENT 2024 TREE LIGHTING 200.000.00 10197 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 11/27/2024 80504557,401.25Regular 0.00 24-10 Invoice 11/27/2024 WATER SERVICES OCTOBER CC, LFSP, MP, … 57,401.250.00 11365 J & B FRONT STREET PARTNERS LLC 11/27/2024 805046641.81Regular 0.00 64461 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND ENCROACHMENT DEPOSIT FOR P… 641.810.00 11291 JOE A GONSALVES & SON 11/27/2024 8050473,750.00Regular 0.00 162081 Invoice 11/27/2024 LOBBYING SERVICES - STATE NOV 2024 3,750.000.00 10213 JOLANDA S CATERING & CAFE 11/27/2024 8050482,902.50Regular 0.00 11/18/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 SENIOR THURSDAY LUNCH NOV 2024 2,902.500.00 10906 JSERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL 11/27/2024 805049500.00Regular 0.00 2003265.021 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND PERMIT 8737 500.000.00 11366 JUNK N CO 11/27/2024 8050501,366.00Regular 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 14 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount 1241 Invoice 11/27/2024 VENDING HAULER OCT 2024 1,366.000.00 11368 KATRINA LEE 11/27/2024 80505114.60Regular 0.00
2003293.021 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND PRINCESS BALLET #12776 14.600.00 10429 KAYUGA SOLUTION INC 11/27/2024 8050528,435.00Regular 0.00 INV-LF-AMP-010 Invoice 11/27/2024 ASSET MANAGEMENT - IRIS 8,435.000.00 10223 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 11/27/2024 8050531,027.55Regular 0.00 296783921 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER OCT COMMU… 34.670.00 296987377 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER NOV SPORTS … 31.360.00 296987478 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER NOV CITY CLE… 36.510.00 296987735 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER NOV 1A 128.070.00 296987916 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR COPIER NOV - SENIOR… 288.400.00 9010197117 Invoice 11/27/2024 MAINTENANCE FOR 24 HP PRINTERS 508.540.00 10226 L & M AUTOMOTIVE 11/27/2024 805054182.20Regular 0.00 56330 Invoice 11/27/2024 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2024 SUBARU OU… 182.200.00 THB004946 NAZILA MOKARRAM 11/27/2024 805055468.85Regular 0.00 11/18/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 EXP REIMB JPIA RISK MGMT TRAINING NO… 468.850.00 10268 NORM S REFRIGERATION LLC 11/27/2024 8050562,540.97Regular 0.00 201022494-00 Invoice 11/27/2024 CIVIC CENTER ADMIN NEW REFRIGERATOR… 2,540.970.00 10273 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 11/27/2024 805057308.00Regular 0.00 84945578 Invoice 11/27/2024 PRE-EMPLOYMENT BLOOD CHECKS 308.000.00 10276 ONWARD ENGINEERING 11/27/2024 80505857.50Regular 0.00 7740 Invoice 11/27/2024 2021-100 LAKE FOREST DR RESURFACING … 57.500.00 10694 ROBERT PEQUENO 11/27/2024 805059283.26Regular 0.00 11/21/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 EXP REIMB CAL CITIES ANN CONF LONG B… 122.460.00 11/27/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 EXP REIMB JPIA ANNUAL RISK MGMT CNF… 160.800.00 11367 SAMANTHA AREVALO 11/27/2024 8050601,230.00Regular 0.00 2003273.021 Invoice 11/27/2024 REFUND PERMIT 7712 1,230.000.00 10611 SCOTT VOIGTS 11/27/2024 805061714.15Regular 0.00
11/19/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 EXP REIM CAL CITIES ANNUAL CNF LONG … 714.150.00 10359 THE GAS COMPANY 11/27/2024 805062231.78Regular 0.00 2943 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/27/2024 LFSP UTILITIES OCT 2024 231.780.00 10376 TRIPEPI SMITH AND ASSOCIATES 11/27/2024 805063635.25Regular 0.00 13507 Invoice 11/27/2024 AV FOR CITY COUNCIL COVERAGE OCT 20… 635.250.00 11362 VALUS SECURITY INC 11/27/2024 80506413,339.85Regular 0.00 1221AM Invoice 11/27/2024 VENDING SECURITY 10/28 - 11/3 4,029.960.00 1224AM Invoice 11/27/2024 VENDING SECURITY 11/4 - 11/8 3,692.010.00 1230AM Invoice 11/27/2024 VENDING SECURITY NOV 9-15 2024 5,617.880.00 10404 VONAGE BUSINESS 11/27/2024 80506510,110.81Regular 0.00 2325279 Invoice 11/27/2024 UTILITIES SERVICES - VOIP PHONE LFSP OCT 546.100.00 2328215 Invoice 11/27/2024 UTILITY SERVICES - VOIP PHONE LFSP NOV… 554.290.00 2329388 Invoice 11/27/2024 UTILITIES SERVICES - VOIP PHONE CIVIC C… 9,010.420.00 10506 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 11/27/2024 805066585.00Regular 0.00 221425 Invoice 11/27/2024 2022-035 TRABUCO REHAB (24S01B) OCT … 585.000.00 11360 YAMAHA GOLF CARS OF CALIFORNIA INC 11/27/2024 8050671,632.70Regular 0.00 A51749 Invoice 11/27/2024 GOLF CART BATTERY SERVICE AUG 2024 1,632.700.00 6,228,521.43Total Regular: 0.00
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 15 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Payment Type: Bank Draft
10076 CALPERS EMPLOYER SVCS 11/05/2024 DFT000026359,042.05Bank Draft 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/05/2024 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PPE 10/25/… 59,042.050.00 10080 CALPERS HEALTH BENEFITS BRANCH 11/05/2024 DFT000026493,442.32Bank Draft 0.00 100000017710330 Invoice 11/05/2024 HEALTH INSURNCE NOVEMBER 2024 93,442.320.00 10076 CALPERS EMPLOYER SVCS 11/19/2024 DFT000027259,620.80Bank Draft 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/19/2024 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PPE 11/08/… 59,620.800.00 212,105.17Total Bank Draft: 0.00
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
CountPayment Type
Bank Code OP Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
215
5 2
3 1
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 226 0.00
Payment
6,413,481.92
4,827.54
-184,960.49
212,105.17
344.20
6,445,798.34
Payable
Count
349
5 0
3 1
358
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
11/26/2024 7:29:26 PM Page 16 of 17
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Amount NumberPayment TypePayment Date Discount Amount Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable AmountPayable Type Discount Amount Bank Code: PR-Payroll
Payment Type: Bank Draft
10005 ADP TAX FINANCIAL SVC 11/01/2024 DFT0000261-65,340.96Bank Draft 0.00 10005 ADP TAX FINANCIAL SVC 11/01/2024 DFT000026165,340.96Bank Draft 0.00 10/25/2024 Invoice 11/01/2024 PAYROLL TAXES FOR PPE 10/25/2024 65,340.960.00 10004 ADP 11/01/2024 DFT0000262264,540.02Bank Draft 0.00 10/25/2024 DD Invoice 11/01/2024 DIRECT DEPOSIT ACH PPE 10/25/2024 264,540.020.00 10005 ADP TAX FINANCIAL SVC 11/15/2024 DFT000027066,334.87Bank Draft 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/15/2024 PAYROLL TAXES FOR PPE 11/08/2024 66,334.870.00 10004 ADP 11/15/2024 DFT0000271272,035.50Bank Draft 0.00 11/08/2024 Invoice 11/15/2024 DIRECT DEPOSIT ACH PPE 11/08/2024 272,035.500.00 602,910.39Total Bank Draft: 0.00
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
CountPayment Type
Bank Code PR Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
0 0
0 5
0 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
5 0.00
Payment
0.00 0.00
0.00 602,910.39
0.00 602,910.39
Payable
Count
0 0
0 4
0 4
Check Report Date Range: 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
215
5 2
8 1
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 231 0.00
6,413,481.92
4,827.54
-184,960.49
815,015.56
344.20
7,048,708.73
349
5 0
7 1
362
Fund Name AmountPeriod
Fund Summary
999 Pooled Cash 7,048,708.7311/2024
7,048,708.73
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2024
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
SUBJECT:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
VARIOUS ROADWAYS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
1. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2023-2025 OPERATING BUDGET; AMENDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2024-25
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The determination of speed limits on City streets is conducted through an Engineering and Traffic Survey (“Survey”) in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“CA MUTCD”). Properly established speed limits reflect prevailing driver behavior and enable the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (“OCSD”) to effectively utilize electronic speed monitoring devices (i.e., radar) for enforcement.
To ensure that speed limits are based on current conditions and remain enforceable via radar, these surveys must be updated at intervals specified in the CVC. On January 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 43 (“AB 43”) took effect and made several additions and modifications to the CVC and subsequently the CA MUTCD that authorize local jurisdictions to establish “safety corridors” that would slightly lower speed limits on certain streets. The most recent Survey results indicate that out of the 125 speed limit segments assessed, 62 should remain unchanged, 60 should decrease, and three should be added. Consequently, no increases in speed limits were necessary.
In accordance with the CVC, the City is required to adopt an ordinance to formalize the revised speed limits for the affected street segments. Staff
3 1
2 5
estimates that the cost for the installation and removal of the necessary speed limit signage will be approximately $25,000. Staff recommends the Council conduct a second reading of and adopt the Ordinance amending prima facie speed limits.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adopting the proposed Ordinance would result in installing and removing speed limit signs. The estimated cost to complete the replacement speed limit signs is $25,000.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance – Establishment of Speed Limits
Initiated By: Thy Merritt, Assistant City Clerk
Submitted By: Lisa Berglund, City Clerk
Approved By: Debra Rose, City Manager
55136.00500\42758874.1
ATTACHMENT
55136.00500\42758874.1
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMIT S ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 22352 establishes default prima facie speed limits for certain types of streets and highways; and WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may make a determination, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, that a different speed limit would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe; and WHEREAS, in 2021, Assembly Bill 43 was signed into law, giving cities greater discretion to lower speed limits on roads, including state highways, that have been identified as “safety corridors” in order to reduce traffic collisions and injuries; and
WHEREAS, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. recently completed an engineering and traffic survey for the City of Lake Forest , in accordance with the requirements of Vehicle Code Section 627 and in conformance with the methodologies established by the California Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic study surveyed 125 different road segments on 56 different roadways to evaluate speed, street parking, stop sign and traffic signal locations, visibility issues, as well as traffic flow at intersections, crosswalks, railroad crossings, and unusual turning movements; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish new speed limits in the areas as determined appropriate based on the engineering and traffic study, and to confirm the prima facie speed limits for those segments as deemed appropriate by the engineering and traffic study; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the new speed limits will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the new speed limits are safe and reasonable; and
55136.00500\42758874.1
WHEREAS, a copy of the applicable engineering and traffic surveys are on file in the offices of the City Clerk and the City Engineer and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
FOREST DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are hereby found to be true and accurate and are incorporated into this Ordinance as findings of the City Council by this reference.
SECTION 2. Adoption. The recommended prima facie speed l imits indicated in the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits - City of Lake Forest, dated October 2024, incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby adopted. The Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits – City of Lake Forest, dated October 2024, is attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 3. Posting Signage. The Director of the Public Works Department is hereby authorized and directed to install and/or upgrade any or all appropriate signs giving notice of said speed limits.
SECTION 4 . Effective Date. This Ordinance No. ____ shall become effective thirty (30) days following its adoption and when appropriate signs giving notice of the new speed limits are posted on the streets and street segments affected by this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") because the Ordinance does not qualify as a “project” under CEQA and because the Ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (State CEQA Guidelines sect ion 15060, subd. (c)(2), (3).) Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines a project as the whole of an action, which could potentially result in either a direct physical change, or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change, in the environment. Here, the Ordinance will not result in any construction or development, and it will not have any other effect that would physically change the environment. The Ordinance therefore does not qualify as a project subject to CEQA.
In the alternative, even if the Ordinance did qualify as a “project” under CEQA, it would be exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), which exempts projects from CEQA “[w]here it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a 55136.00500\42758874.1
significant effect on the environment.” Thus, even if the Ordinance could result in some physical change in the environment, the Ordinance is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance is based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at Lake Forest City Hall, 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance, which can be given, effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 8. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once within fifteen (15) days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Lake Forest, and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ______ 2024 by the following vote, to wit:
MARK TETTEMER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MATTHEW E. RICHARDSON
55136.00500\42758874.1
CITY ATTORNEY
55136.00500\42758874.1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST )
I, Lisa Berglund, City Clerk of the City of Lake Forest, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ____ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____ day of ____ 2024, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Lake Forest City Council on the ____ day of ____ 2024 by the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
LISA BERGLUND
CITY CLERK
55136.00500\42758874.1
EXHIBIT A
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
FOR SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
OCTOBER 2024
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA 92630
(949) 461-3480
PREPARED BY:
HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERS
17821 E. 17TH STREET, SUITE 245
TUSTIN, CA 92780
(714) 731-9455
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ i Traffic Engineer's Certification ...................................................................................................... ii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Basic Speed Law............................................................................................................................. 1 Prima Facie Speed Limits ............................................................................................................... 2 Business District ..............................................................................................................................2 Residence District ........................................................................................................................... 2 Assembly Bill 43............................................................................................................................. 3 Safety Corridor................................................................................................................................ 3 High Pedestrian & Bike Users ........................................................................................................ 3 Establishment of Speed Zones........................................................................................................ 3 Data Collection Procedures............................................................................................................. 4 Speed Zoning Methodology............................................................................................................ 4 Speed Zone Survey ......................................................................................................................... 5 Local Street Exemptions................................................................................................................. 6 Other Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 6 Radar Collection Time-Frames....................................................................................................... 6 Analysis Factors.............................................................................................................................. 6 Field Review ................................................................................................................................... 7 Collision History............................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 8 Safety Corridor Analysis..................................................................................................... 8 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes"............................................................................ 9 Support Explanations for "No Speed Limit Changes"...................................................... 13 Locations of New Speed Limit Postings........................................................................... 14 Support Explanations for "New Speed Limit Postings" ................................................... 14 Locations of "Speed Limit Reductions" ........................................................................... 15 Support Explanations for "Speed Limit Reductions" ....................................................... 17 Summary of Recommendations.....................................................................................................31 Appendix A – Speed Limit Map
Appendix B – For Each Street Segment in the Survey
Data Summary Sheet
Radar Speed Distribution Sheet
Appendix C – Certification
Radar Gun Certification
Technician Certification
1 CITY OF LAKE FOREST
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS
Introduction
In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) has been developed for the City of Lake Forest as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The work provided herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. The goal of the review was two-fold. The first was to review new roadway segments to determine if speed limit postings should be recommended. The second involved a determination as to whether changes in pre -existing conditions have occurred where older speed limits should be modified.
The requirement to perform E&TS for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC). CVC Section 40802 states that at least once every five (5), seven (7), or fourteen (14) years, States and local agencies should re -evaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways. E&TS must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits. If such a survey is not performed within five (5), seven (7) years, or fourteen (14) years as stated previously of the date of the preceding survey, then the new data and its use will constitute a "speed trap". Hence, evidence using such would not be admissible in court.
The definition of an E&TS is contained in Section 627 of the Vehicle Code and is as follows:
E&TS, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by State and local authorities. An E&TS shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of the following:
(a) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (b) Collision records.
(c) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The CVC has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understa nding of the "Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and "Intermediate Speed Zones".
Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350)
All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as:
2 "No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time -to-time and place-to-place and, therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust their driving behavior to fit the conditions encountered and must learn to do this with a minimum of assistance from the police. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions around them.
Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)
All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima fac ie speed limit when it is safe to do so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.
Certain prima facie limits are automatically established by law (CVC 22352), including a 15 miles per hour (mph) limit in alleys, blind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph speed limit in school zones when children are present on the route to or from school.
Business and residence districts are defined in the Vehicle Code as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Sections 235 and 515 define these regulations. A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether or not a valid business or residence district exists. The law does not require posting these prima facie limits that are readily apparent.
Business District (CVC 235)
A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occ upied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of business in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
Residence District (CVC 515)
A "residence district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists. 3 Assembly Bill 43
In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 43, it established two (2) new categories for consideration where it may be appropriate to reduce the speed limit by 5 mph. These were codified as CVC 22358.7 as explained in further detail below. The first category is for a street to be designated as a Safety Corridor; and the second category is for a street to be designated as a street with high concentrations of bicyclists and/or pedestrians. Based on the CVC, i t should be noted that two (2) new categories cannot be applied to Caltrans State highways. This exclusion would not apply to the City of Lake Forest because there are no Caltrans State highways in the City.
Safety Corridor (CVC 22358.7(a)(1))
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD ) defines a Safety Corridor to be a street where the highest number of fatalities and/or serious injury collisions occurs over a period of three (3) to five (5 ) years. Safety Corridors are limited to 20 percent of City maintained streets. Therefore, it may be appropriate that certain collisions involving vulnerable populations (i.e., children, seniors and persons with disabilities) are weighted more in order to prioritize which streets get the Safety Corridor designation. Streets designated as Safety Corridors may have the speed limit reduced by 5 mph.
High Pedestrian & Bike Users (CVC 22358.7(a)(2))
Based on the CA MUTCD, streets that have facilities that generate high concentration of pedestrian and bike users may have the speed limit reduced by 5 mph. Examples of these facilities include schools, parks, medical facilities, religious centers and shopping centers. It is important to note that only the portion within 1,320 feet of these types of facilities would qualify for the 5 mph speed reduction.
In accordance with the CA MUTCD, an acceptable alternative to high concentration of pedestrian and bike users is to identify the streets within the top 20 percent of fatalities and/or serious injuries collisions involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists over a period of three (3) to five (5) years.
Establishment of Speed Zones
The reason that speed limit areas and their required postings are done is to guard r easonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other similar laws, the limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reaso nable and safe. It is this type of information that is reflected in the analysis section of this report. Namely, posted speed limits are a reflection of that speed which most people deem to be safe as opposed to a minority of drivers who do not drive in a reasonable manner.
Speed zones are also established to advise of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the anal ytical data and collision history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit. 4 Data Collection Procedures
Speed evaluation data was collected at 125 different segments on 56 different roadways in the City of Lake Forest. These areas and the number of segments on each are described as follows:
1. Aliso Park Drive/
Northcrest Drive (1)
19. Lake Center Drive/
Mercury Road (1)
37. Portola Parkway (5)
38. Rancho Parkway (2)
2. Alton Parkway (4) 20. Lake Forest Drive (10) 39. Rancho Parkway South (1)
3. Aspan Street (1) 21. Lambert Street (1) 40. Regency Lane (1)
4. Bake Lane (1) 22. Los Alisos Boulevard (4) 41. Ridgeline Road (2)
5. Bake Parkway (10) 23. Monarch Boulevard (1) 42. Ridge Route Drive (4)
6. Burbank (1) 24. Montcliff Drive (1) 43. Rimhurst Drive (1)
7. Cañada Road (2) 25. Muirlands Boulevard (4) 44. Rockfield Boulevard (5)
8. Catalina (1) 26. Normandale Drive (1) 45. Rue De Fortuna (1)
9. Centre Drive (1) 27. Olympus (1) 46. Rue De Valore (1) 10 Cherry Avenue (1) 28. Ostermand Road (1) 47. Saddleback Ranch Road (3)
11. Civic Center Drive (1) 29. Overlake (1) 48. Santa Margarita Parkway (1)
12. Commercentre Drive (2) 30. Palmwood Drive (1) 49. Santiago Canyon Road (1)
13. Dimension Drive (2) 31. Paloma (1) 50. Serrano Road (3)
14. El Toro Road (11) 32. Paseo Sombra (1) 51. Serrano Summit Drive (1)
15. Glenn Ranch Road (2) 33. Paseo Tranquillo (1) 52. Tamarisk (1)
16. Gowdy Avenue (1) 34. Pauling (1) 53. Toledo Lane (1)
17. Jeronimo Lane (1) 35. Peachwood (1) 54. Toledo Way (3)
18. Jeronimo Road (4) 36. Pittsford Drive (1) 55. Towne Centre Drive (3)
56. Trabuco Road (5)
As described in various traffic engineering documents - including information provided by the State of California, t he individual locations on which radar data collection procedures used involved considerations for the following:
a. Stop sign or traffic signal locations;
b. Visibility issues;
c. Traffic flow at intersections, cross-traffic, major driveways, crosswalks, railroad crossings and unusual turning movements;
d. The influence of other traffic factors on the speed of cars: such as on street parking, roadway features, adjacent land uses, and lighting.
Speed Zoning Methodology
The CA MUTCD specifies a "short method " of determining speed limits on City and County through Highways, Arterial and Collector Roads Procedures. This short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorist speeds; one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective.
5 Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent three- to five-year collision rec ord, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, super -elevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
Speed Zone Survey
- Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a radar speed meter.
- A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducte d. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits.
- Speed measurements should be taken during off -peak hours on weekdays. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is impo rtant that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to sur vey traffic in both directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway center line.
- It is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey. This may result in excessive survey periods for low -volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted for a minimum of two (2) hours, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles.
- The CA MUTCD states that speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed can be selected directly from the data sheet. However, roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist or other roadway condi tions that may impact sight distance may result in a further reduction of 5 mph in the recommended speed limit.
- As a check on the validity of the proposed speed limit, an analysis should be made of the three- to five-year collision record for the sectio n of roadway under consideration. If this record shows an abnormally high percentage of collisions normally associated with excessive speeds, the proposed speed limit should be further reduced. It is a judgment situation, and will not usually be a factor.
- Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition areas. - Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadway development.
- Speed zoning should be coordinated between adjacent jurisdictions. 6 Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802)
Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an E&TS. The code is as follows:
"For the purpose of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definiti on shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions:
1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
2. Not more than one half mile of uninterrupted length.
3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
Other Considerations
Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices , roadway alignment, width surface conditions, collision history and any unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.
Radar Collection Time-Frames
The hours of radar operation were restricted to off -peak periods (when possible) for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather.
The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash of an unmarked vehicle with the meter - reading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar unit's calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork.
The radar operator and assistant recorded the speed meter readings for each location on Radar Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the appendix of this report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed.
Analysis Factors
Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These in clude the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below.
1. The CRITICAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic enginee rs have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits. 7 Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this case is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that ot her factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used, it not only conforms to that required by the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits.
2. The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greate st extent possible is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed.
3. The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED, or 50th percentile speed, represent s the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50 percent of the vehicles travel faster than the median speed , and 50 percent travel slower than the median speed. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution.
4. The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is that speed at or below which 15 percent of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the ve hicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the collision potential.
5. MODAL SPEED : The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution (the most). It serves as another useful m easure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits.
6. STANDARD DEVIATION : This is a mathematical element, which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the overall review of recommended speed limits and serves to verify the level of confidence of data used in making recommendations.
7. The MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the number of samples.
The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the speed distribution curves calculated for each survey location. These distribution curves represent a method of graphic analysis that compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling.
Field Review
In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is t hat existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually indicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed below:
8 1. Segment length, width and alignment
2. Level of pedestrian activity
3. Traffic flow characteristics
4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves.
5. Driver sight distance constraints.
6. Adjacent residential/commercial/industrial etc. zoning.
7. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors
8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on street parking;
9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;
10. Roadway conditions, bumps and dips;
11. Obstructions to pedestrian visibility;
12. Land use and proximity of schools;
13. Uniformity and continuity with existing speed zones to/with adjacent jurisdictions;
14. Any other unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The results of the field review of related road/traffic variables are summarized on the E&TS forms found in the Appendix of this report.
Collision History
The E&TS forms summarize the available five-year collision information for the subject stre ets.
The collision information includes the total number of collisions within each street segment and of those collisions, the number that are speed-related, involved fatalities, serious injuries, pedestrians and bicyclists. This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the City of Lake Forest . To provide an equitable comparison between street segments, the collision data was converted to collisions per million vehicle miles.
Results and Recommendations
The following Summaries: Safety Corridor analysis, No Speed Limit Changes, New Speed Limit Postings, Speed Limit Reductions and Summary of Recommendations , present the results of the radar survey for the selected 125 locations. As shown, the Summary of Recommendations chart presents the necessary analysis elements that in addition to the field review of a registered Traffic Engineer led to the recommendations indicated.
Safety Corridor Analysis
In accordance with the CVC and CA MUTCD, the Safety Corridor designation is limited to 20 percent of City maintained streets. In the City of Lake Forest , there are approximately 200 miles of City maintained streets. These do not include private streets that are maintained by the various Homeowner Associations (HOAs). A maximum of 40.0 miles of City streets can be designated as a Safety Corridor.
Based on an analysis of all 12 5 street segments, collision history and street prioritization, the following 32 streets in the Table below are recommended to be designated as Safety Corridors.
Collectively, the Safety Corridors have a total of 19.67 miles, which is less than the maximum of
40.0 miles.
9 STREET LOCATION MILES
Alton Parkway West City Limits to Towne Centre Dr (West) 0.90 Bake Parkway North Pointe Dr to Commercentre Dr 0.48
Cherry Avenue Jeronimo Rd to Trabuco Rd 0.94
El Toro Road
Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd 0.60
Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way 0.39
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd 0.42
Trabuco Rd to Aliso Park Dr 0.36
Aliso Park Dr to Northcrest Dr 0.47
Northcrest Dr to Normandale Dr 0.99
Portola Pkwy/Santa Margarita Pkwy to
Marguerite Pkwy 0.61
Glenn Ranch Rd to Ridgeline Rd 0.87
Glenn Ranch Road Portola Pkwy to Saddleback Ranch Rd 0.92 Jeronimo Road Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.50
El Toro Rd to Los Alisos Blvd 0.48
Lake Forest Dr
Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd 0.35
Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way 0.35
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd 0.74
Trabuco Rd to Pittsford Dr 0.71
Pittsford Dr to Dimension Dr 0.71
Dimension Dr to Towne Centre Dr 0.80
Portola Pkwy to Bake Pkwy 0.36
Muirlands Boulevard Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.57
Ridge Route Drive Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd 0.50 Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd 0.55
Rockfield Boulevard Ridge Route Dr to Cavanaugh Rd 0.44 Santiago Canyon Road Ridgeline Rd to North City Limit 0.87 Serrano Road
Toledo Way to Lake Forest Dr 0.85
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr 0.41
Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.44
Trabuco Road
Bake Pkwy to Peachwood 0.85
Peachwood to Lake Forest Dr 0.85
Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd 0.39
TOTAL 19.67
Locations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The Summary indicates that 62 of the 125 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. The reason centers mostly on the fact that the newly measured values of the 85th percentile and the 10 MPH pace are still within the parameters of the existing speed limits. Additional factors such as reduc ed sight distance, higher than expected collision rates, high pedestrian and bicyclist traffic, area considered a safety corridor, and keeping continuity with the speeds of neighboring segments form the basis in some instances of our recommendation. Therefore, the current postings should remain as is. At seven (7) of these locations, only one direction of travel isposted and is listed for no change in the speed limit. Hence, the other direction should be posted for consistency. These segments noted as “install”, as well as the segments recommended for “No Change” are listed below:
10 Aliso Park Drive/Northcrest Drive
El Toro Rd (W) to El Toro Rd (E) Remain posted at 35 mph Alton Parkway
Towne Centre Dr/Rancho Pkwy South to SR 241 Remain posted at 50mph, Install EB SR 241 to Portola Pkwy Remain posted at50 mph
Portola Pkwy to Paloma/Romano Remain posted at 40 mph
Aspan Street
Muirlands Blvd to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 35mph Bake Lane
Toledo Ln to Jeronimo Ln Remain posted at 25mph
Bake Parkway
West City Limit (w/o Jeronimo Rd) to Toledo Way Remain posted at 50mph Toledo Way toTrabuco Rd Remain posted at 50 mph
Trabuco Rd to South Pointe Dr Remain posted at50 mph
Towne Centre Dr to Portola Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph, Install EB Rue De Fortuna to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 40 mph Burbank
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at35 mph
Cañada Road
Lake Forest Drive to Birenda Remain posted at 40 mph
Birenda to Dimension Dr Remain posted at 40 mph, Install EB Centre Drive
Rockfield Blvd to Aspan St Remain posted at 35 mph
Commercentre Drive
Alton Pkwy to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph
Bake Pkwy to Dimesion Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Dimension Drive
Monarch Blvd/Catalina to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 35 mph Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
El Toro Road
West City Limit (I-5 Fwy) to Rockfield Blvd Remain posted at 40 mph Glenn Ranch Rd to Ridgeline Rd Remain posted at 50 mph
Glenn Ranch Road
Saddleback Ranch Rd to El Toro Rd Remain posted at 50 mph Gowdy Avenue
Cavanaugh Rd to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 30 mph
11 Jeronimo Lane
Bake Ln to Cayuga Ln Remain posted at 25 mph
Jeronimo Road
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Lake Center Drive/Mercury Road
Lake Forest Dr to Rockfield Blvd Remain posted at 30 mph Lake Forest Drive
West City Limit (I-5 Fwy) to Rockfield Blvd Remain posted at 40 mph Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Remain posted at 45 mph Towne Centre Drive to Portola Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph, Install EB Lambert Street
Aspan St to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 30 mph
Los Alisos Boulevard
Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Remain posted at 45 mph
Jeronimo Rd to Madero Remain posted at 45 mph
Montcliff Drive
Rimhurst Dr to El Toro Rd Remain Posted at 40 mph, Install SB Muirlands Blvd
North City Limit (650’ s/o Bake Pkwy) to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 45 mph Normandale Drive
Osterman Rd to El Toro Rd Remain posted at 35 mph
Osterman Road
Regency Ln to Pittsford Dr Remain posted at 35 mph
Overlake Drive
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 25 mph Paloma
Portola Pkwy to Alton Pkwy/Romano Remain posted at 35 mph Paseo Sombra
Trabuco Rd to Paseo Cipres Remain posted at 35 mph
Paseo Tranquill
Trabuco Rd to Paseo Cipres Remain posted at 35 mph
Pauling
Portola Pkwy at Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 35 mph
12 Peachwood
Trabuco Rd to Tamerisk Remain posted at 45 mph
Portola Pkwy
SR 241 to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Lake Forest Dr to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph
Bake Pkwy to Alton Pkwy Remain posted at 45 mph
Alton Pkwy to North City Limit Remain posted at 45 mph, Install NB Rancho Parkway
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Remain posted at 45 mph
Rancho Parkway South
Alton Pkwy Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 40 mph
Regency Lane
Lake Forest Dr to Normandale Dr Remain posted at 35 mph Ridgeline Road
Santiago Canyon Rd to Saddleback Ranch Rd Remain posted at 35 mph Saddleback Rancho Rd to El Toro Rd Remain posted at 40 mph Rimhurst Drive
Trabuco Rd to Rimgate Dr Remain posted at 25 mph
Rockfield Boulevard
Cavanaugh Rd to Silverbay Dr Remain posted at 40 mph
Silverbay Dr to Los Alisos Blvd Remain posted at 40 mph Rue De Fortuna
Bake Pkwy to Rue De Valore Remain posted at 35 mph
Rue De Valore
Lake Forest Dr to Rue De Fortuna Remain posted at 35 mph Toledo Lane
Bake Ln to Cul-De-Sac Remain posted at 25 mph
Toledo Way
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Remain posted at 45 mph Towne Centre Drive
Alton Pkwy to Bake Pkwy Remain posted at 35 mph
Bake Pkwy to Portola Pkwy/Pauling Remain posted at 35 mph, Install SB Trabuco Road
El Toro Rd to South City Limit Remain posted at 45 mph
13 Support Explanations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The following are support explanations for the roadway segments that the recommended speed limit is 5 mph or more lower than the newly measured 85 th percentile speed. Also, menti oned below are those segments that have posted speed signs in only one direction. For enforcement, it is recommended that an appropriate speed limit sign be installed.
Alton Parkway
3 - Towne Centre Drive/Rancho Parkway South to SR 241
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 0.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 50 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
Bake Parkway
15 - Towne Centre Drive to Portola Parkway
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
Cañada Road
20 - Birenda to Dimension Drive
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 40 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
El Toro Road
39 - Glenn Ranch Road to Ridgeline Road
This segment of El Toro Road is a two -lane rural roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), a bike trail and open land. Field notes state that the roadway has a slight to gradual horizontal and vertical cur ves, areas of no shoulders, no stopping any time and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.
Lake Forest Drive
57 - Towne Centre Drive to Portola Parkway
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
14 Montcliff Drive
65 - Rimhurst Drive to El Toro Road
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 30 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.
Portola Parkway
85 - Alton Parkway to North City Limit
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the northbound direction.
Towne Centre Drive
120 - Bake Parkway to Portola Parkway/Pauling
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 35 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.
Locations of “New Speed Limit Postings”
Two (2) locations are currently un-posted. It is noted that for those cases, the recommendation to post is necessary to enhance the enforcement of the recommended speed limit. And although Civic Center Drive does have existing speed limit signs of 25 mph, it is unen forceable because there was no prior speed survey to establish the speed limit. Based on the speed data the segments listed below are recommended to post /install such speed limit signs for both directions and is identified in the Summary of Recommendations.
Civic Center Drive
Commercentre Dr to Olympus Post a 35 mph Speed Limit
Olympus
Serrano Summit Dr to Civic Center Dr Post a 25 mph Speed Limit Serrano Summit Drive
Commercentre Dr to Olympus Post a 35 mph Speed Limit
Support Explanations of “New Speed Limit Postings”
Civic Center Drive
24 - Commercentre Drive to Olympus
This segment of Civic Center Drive is a two -lay roadway. The adjacent land uses are City Hall, commercial, industrial and some residential (non-fronting). Field notes statethe roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 37.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 28 to 37 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for thissegment.
15 Olympus
71 - Serrano Summit Drive to Civic Center Drive
This segment of Olympus is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and City Hall. Field notes state that the roadway has roundabouts at Serrano Summit Drive and Civic Center Drive and has heave on -street parking. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 20 to 29 mph, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
Serrano Summit Drive
112 - Commercentre Drive to Olympus
This segment of Serrano Summit Drive is a two-lay roadway. The adjacent land uses are club house, community pool, residential (non-fronting) and commercial. Field notes state the roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 39.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 31 to 40 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
Locations of “Speed Limit Reductions”
At 60 locations, the E&TS data indicates a need for a speed limit reduction. T he newly measured values of the 85 th percentile speeds, the 10 mph pace range, roadway characteristics such as horizontal/vertical curves, limited sight distance, and to keep consistency with speeds of adjacent segments, or high collision rates were factors used to make these recommendations. These segments and reasons for the recommendations are explained below:
Alton Parkway
Commercentre Dr to Towne Centre Dr (W) Reduce from 55mph to 50 mph Bake Parkway
South Pointe Dr to North Pointe Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50mph North Pointe Dr to Commercentre Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Commercentre Dr to Dimension Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Dimension Dr to Towne Centre Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Portola Pkwy to Rue De Fortuna Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Catalina
Alton Pkwy to Dimension Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Cherry Avenue
Jeronimo Rd to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph
El Toro Road
Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Trabuco Rd to Aliso Park Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Aliso Park Dr to Northcrest Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Northcrest Dr to Normandale Dr Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph 16 El Toro Road (continued)
Normandale Dr to Portola /Santa Margarita Pkwy Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Portola/Santa Margarita Pkwy to Marguerite Pkwy Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Glenn Ranch Road
Portola Pkwy to Saddleback Ranch Rd Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph Jeronimo Road
Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph El Toro Rd to Los Alisos Blvd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Lake Forest Drive
Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Trabuco Rd to Pittsford Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Pittsford Dr to Dimension Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Dimension Dr to Towne Centre Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Portola Pkwy to Bake Pkwy Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph
Los Alisos Boulevard
West City Limit (I-5 Fwy) to Rockfield Blvd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Monarch Boulevard
Alton Pkwy to Dimension Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Muirlands Boulevard
Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph El Toro Rd to Los Alisos Blvd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Palmwood Drive
Peachwood (N) to Peachwood (S) Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Pittsford Drive
Northcrest Dr to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Portola Pkwy
El Toro Rd to SR 241 Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph
Rancho Parkway
Lake Forest Dr to Portola Pkwy Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Ridge Route Drive
Rockfield Blvd to Muirlands Blvd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Muirlands Blvd to Jeronimo Rd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Jeronimo Rd to Toledo Way Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph
Toledo Way to Trabuco Rd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph
17 Rockfield Boulevard
North City Limit to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Ridge Route Dr to Cavanaugh Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Saddleback Ranch Road
Glenn Ranch Rd to Millwood Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Millwood Rd to Pendleton Rd Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Pendleton Rd to Ridgeline Rd Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Santa Margarita Pkwy
El Toro Rd to South City Limit Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Santiago Canyon Road
Ridgeline Rd to North City Limit Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Serrano Road
Toledo Way to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 40 mph to 35 mph Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 35 mph to 30 mph Tamerisk
Peachwood (S) to Peachwood (N) Reduce from 30 mph to 25 mph Toledo Way
Bake Pkwy to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Towne Centre Drive
Alton Pkwy (W) to Alton Pkwy (E) Reduce from 45 mph to 40 mph Trabuco Road
Bake Pkwy to Peachwood Reduce from 55 mph to 50 mph
Peachwood to Lake Forest Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Lake Forest Dr to Ridge Route Dr Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Ridge Route Dr to El Toro Rd Reduce from 50 mph to 45 mph Support Explanations for “Speed Limit Reductions”
Alton Parkway
2 – Commercentre Drive to Towne Centre Drive (W)
This segment of Alton Parkway is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 61.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 60 m ph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. I n accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 60 mph speed limit be reduced to 55 mph.
18 Bake Parkway
11 - South Pointe Drive to North Pointe Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and a church. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 54.2 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 46 to 55 mph, i t is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
12 - North Pointe Drive to Commercentre Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 55.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
13 - Commercentre Drive to Dimension Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. Field observations included bike lanes, no stopping any time, g radual to moderate horizontal-vertical roadway curves and areas of limited sight distance at roadway curves. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 48 to 57 mph.
With areas of limited sight distance and to main tain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph. 14 - Dimension Drive to Towne Centre Drive
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and residential (non -fronting). Field observations include bike lanes, no stopping any time, and slight to gradual roadway curves. The speed data shows a n 85th percentile speed of
56.6 mph, which may suggest a speed lim it of 55 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
16 - Portola Parkway to Rue De Fortuna
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and a library. Field notes include a constant slight “C” curve. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.1 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Catalina
21 - Alton Parkway to Dimension Drive
This segment of Catalina is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non -fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sw eeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of
39.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this 19 segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Cherry Avenue
23 - Jeronimo Road to Trabuco Road
This segment of Cherry Avenue is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile s peed of 37.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City th at involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph spee d limit be reduced to 30 mph.
El Toro Road
30 - Rockfield Boulevard to Muirlands Boulevard
The segment of El Toro Road is an eight -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, commercial and residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows a n 85th percentile speed of
47.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 13 speed -related collisions, four (4) involved a serious injury, six (6) involved a pedestrian and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
31 - Muirlands Boulevard to Jeronimo Road
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, church, fire station and residential (non -fronting). A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had seven (7) speed -related collisions and three (3) involved a bicyclist. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.3 mph and 10 mph pace range of 45 to 54 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
32 - Jeronimo Road to Toledo Way
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adj acent land uses are business and residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed -related coll ision, one (1) involved a serious injury and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 33 - Toledo Way to Trabuco Road
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adj acent land use is residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a 20 speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed-related collisions, three (3) involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
34 - Trabuco Road to Aliso Park Drive
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjace nt land use is residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station. The speed data shows a n 85th percentile speed of
54.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 35 - Aliso Park Drive to Northcrest Drive
This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) t o three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land use is residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions and three (3) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
36 - Northcrest Drive to Normandale Drive
This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had eight (8) speed -related collisions and one (1) fatality collision, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
37 - Normandale Drive to Portola Parkway/Santa Margarita Parkway This segment of El Toro Road is a six -lane roadway. T he adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 50 to 59 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed -related collisions and one (1) collision involved a pedestrian. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
38 - Portola Parkway/Santa Margarita Parkway to Marguerite Parkway This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 57.4 mph, which may suggest a s peed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history 21 revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
Glenn Ranch Road
40 - Portola Parkway to Saddleback Ranch Road
This segment of Glenn Ranch Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, park and open sp ace. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
Jeronimo Road
45 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and an int ermediate school. Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph. 46 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collisi on history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1 ), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
47 - El Toro Road to Los Alisos Boulevard
This segment of Je ronimo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, park and a driving range. Field notes state that the roadway has slight horizontal and vertical curves, bike lanes and no stopping any time. The speed d ata shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had five (5) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicycl ist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Lake Forest Drive
51 - Muirlands Boulevard to Jeronimo Road
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and mobile home park (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed -related collisions, one ( 1) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segme nt is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
52 - Jeronimo Road to Toledo Way
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a s ix-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a club house. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment h ad one (1) speed -related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1 ), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 53 - Toledo Way to Trabuco Road
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of
52.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed -related collisions, two (2) inv olved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance w ith CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 54 - Trabuco Road to Pittsford Drive
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, commercial and a church. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A revi ew of the collision history revealed that this segment had nine (9) speed -related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, three (3) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the t op locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
23 55 - Pittsford Drive to Dimension Drive
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station. The speed dat a shows an 85th percentile speed of
52.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions, one (1) inv olved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist , which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 56 - Dimension Drive to Towne Centre Drive
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and hotels. Th e speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 58 - Portola Parkway to Bake Parkway
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is sole ly commercial. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 49.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of t he top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Los Alisos Boulevard
60 - West City Limits (I-5 Freeway) to Rockfield Boulevard This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), SCE sub-station and a water district. Field notes state the roadway has slight to gradual curves, no stopping any time, bike lanes and bus stops. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.4 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 61 - Rockfield Boulevard to Muirlands Boulevard
This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (n on-fronting), park and church. Field notes show that this segment has conflicting speed limits with a 45 mph speed limit posted in the eastbound direction and a 50 mph speed limit posted in the westbound direction. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 39 to 48 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 24 Monarch Bouleard
64 - Alton Parkway to Dimension Drive
This segment of Monarch Bolevard is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non -fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sweeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch o f this segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Muirlands Boulevard
68 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non -fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had four (4) speed -related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) collision involved a serious injury, (1) involved a pedestrian, and (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph. 69 - El Toro Road to Los Alisos Boulevard
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial at El Toro Road and parks and intermediate at Los Ali sos Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bik e users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school, park or commercial shopping center within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Palmwood Drive
74 - Peachwood (N) to Peachwood (S)
This segment of Palmwood Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is multifamily residential. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 33.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 25 to 34 mph, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Pittsford Drive
80 - Northcrest Drive to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Pittsford Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are resi dential (non-fronting), parks and a elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “hi gh concentrations of pedestrians and 25 bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or park within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Portola Parkway
81 - El Toro Road to SR 241
This segment of Portola Parkway is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, church and residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th p ercentile speed of
51.0 mph and 10 mph pace range of 43 to 52 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments on Portola Parkway and Santa Margarita Parkway, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
Rancho Parkway
87 - Lake Forest Drive to Portola Parkway
This segment of Rancho Parkway is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business, skate park, volleyball center, Sherriff’s Station and community park. Field notes state that there is heavy pedestrian traffic to the volleyball center and skate park, heavy on -street parking, areas of red curbs and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of
46.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. How ever, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a community park, a skate park and volleyball center within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Ridge Route Drive
92 - Rockfield Boulevard to Muirlands Boulevard
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 42.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 223 58.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 93 - Muirlands Boulevard to Jeronimo Road
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), club house, and business at Muirlands Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collision s. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 26 94 - Jeronimo Road to Toledo Way
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 43.6 mph and 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph. To maintain consistency wi th speed limits of 35 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 95 - Toledo Way to Trabuco Road
This segment of Ridge Route Drive is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting), an elementary school and high school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 42.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high con centrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.
Rockfield Boulevard
97 - North City Limit to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are dense commercial and business. Field notes include short distances between inters ection, no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of
43.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
98 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial. Field notes include no stopping any time, no shoulders and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph and 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 40 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph. 99 - Ridge Route Drive to Cavanaugh Road
This segment of Rockfield Boulevard is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non -fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Saddleback Ranch Road
104 - Glenn Ranch Road toMillwood Road
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) with a school nearby. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 37 to 46 m ph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
27 105 - Millwood Road to Pendleton Road
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and an elementary school. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, slight to gradual horizontal and vertical curves, areas of limited sight distance and no stopping any time except in front of the school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 44.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For t he entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.
106 - Pendleton Road to Ridgeline Road
This segment of Saddleback Ranch Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses residential (non -fronting), club house pool and pickleball courts and elementary school at Pendleton Road. Field note include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, gradual to constant horizontal and vertical curves, and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 37.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school or club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph sp eed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Santa Margarita Parkway
107 - El Toro Road to South City Limit
This segment of Santa Margarita Parkway has three (3) to four (4) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school at the south City limit in the City of Mission Viejo. Field observations include school age pedestrians and bike traffic, bike lane and no stopping any time. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 51.2 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
Santiago Canyon Road
108 - Ridgeline Road to North City Limit
This segment of Santiago Canyon Road is a rural two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial at Live Oak Canyon Road and open undeveloped land. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1 ), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph. 28 Serrano Road
109 - Toledo Way to Lake Forest Drive
This se gment of Serrano Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), Serrano Creek park, an elementary school, and business at Lake Forest Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 41.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 40 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) collisions involved in a serious injury, and one involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.
110 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Serrano Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), park, and elementary school. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of
38.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision and one (1) involved in a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/ or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
111 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Serrano Road is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), high school and business at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 39.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed -related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existi ng 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
Tamerisk
113 - Peachwood (S) to Peachwood (N)
This segment of Tamerisk is a two -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting). Field notes state that the roadway has gradual to sweeping h orizontal curves.
With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 29.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 23 to 32 mph, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.
Toledo Way
115 - Bake Parkway to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Toledo Road is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a tennis club. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of
48.7 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 41 to 50 mph, it is recommended that th e existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
29 117 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Toledo Way is a four -lane roadway. The adja cent land uses residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field observations include school age ped estrians. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 45.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph.
However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike use rs”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Towne Centre Drive
118 - Alton Parkway (W) to Alton Parkway (E)
This segment of Towne Centre Drive is a four -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial and a small section of residential (non -fronting). With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
Trabuco Road
121 - Bake Parkway to Peachwood
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land us es are residential (non-fronting), commercial, church and cemetery. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed -related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph. 122 - Peachwood to Lake Forest Drive
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six -lane roa dway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of
52.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury, and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), thi s segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 123 - Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Drive
This segment of Trabu co Road is a six -lane arterial. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.2 mph and 10 mph pace range of 42 to 51 mph. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 45 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph. 124 - Ridge Route Drive to El Toro Road
This segment of Trabuco Road is a six -lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road and Ridge Route Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 50.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a 30 fatality, two (2) involved a pedestrian, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
31 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 2024
STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
ALISO PARK DR-NORTHCREST DR
1 WEST EL TORO RD TO
EAST EL TORO RD 35 / *25 35 39.8 35.4 32-41 75.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
ALTON PARKWAY
2 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO PKWY S 60 55 61.4 56.6 53-62 68.1 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 3 TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO PKWY S
TO SR-241 50 50 50.4 46.3 42-51 77.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 4 SR-241 TO
PORTOLA PKWY 50 50 51.6 47.0 44-53 69.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 5 PORTOLA PKWY TO
PALOMA-ROMANO 40 40 42.8 38.1 35-44 76.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
ASPAN STREET
6 MUIRLANDS BL TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 35 38.2 33.4 28-37 72.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
BAKE LANE
7 TOLEDO LANE TO
JERONIMO LANE 25 25 29.7 24.8 21-30 74.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
BAKE PARKWAY
8 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
TOLEDO WAY 50 50 51.2 46.8 44-53 72.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 9 TOLEDO WAY TO
TRABUCO RD 50 50 53.0 48.9 45-54 76.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 10 TRABUCO RD TO
SOUTH POINTE DR 50 50 52.1 48.4 45-53 80.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 11 SOUTH POINTE DR TO
NORTH POINTE DR 55 50 54.2 49.7 46-55 68.9 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
32 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
BAKE PKWY Continued
12 NORTH POINTE DR TO
COMMERCENTRE DTR 55 50 55.4 50.5 48-57 69.3 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 13 COMMERCENTRE DR TO
DIMENSION DR 55 50 55.9 52.1 48-57 79.9 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 14 DIMENSION DR TO
TOWNE CENTRE DR 55 50 56.6 52.5 48-57 74.9 REDUCE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED LIMIT 15 TOWNE CENTRE DR TO
PORTOLA PKWY 45 WB 45 43.9 40.0 36-45 81.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST EB 16 PORTOLA PKWY TO
RUE DE FORTUNA 45 40 44.1 40.2 36-45 78.7 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 17 RUE DE FORTUNA TO
LAKE FOREST DR 40 40 42.9 38.6 34-43 75.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
BURBANK
18 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 35 36.3 32.5 28-37 85.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE CAÑADA ROAD
19 LAKE FOREST DR TO
BIRENDRA 40 40 42.4 39.0 35-44 86.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 20 BIRENDRA TO
DIMENSION DR 40 40 41.6 37.5 33-42 79.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
CATALINA
21 ALTON PKWY TO
DIMENSION DR 35 30 39.9 34.9 31-40 76.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
CENTRE DRIVE
22 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
ASPAN ST 35 35 34.8 29.1 24-33 73.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE WB = WESTBOUND
33 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
CHERRY AVENUE
23 JERONIMO RD TO
TRABUCO RD 35 30 37.7 32.8 29-38 73.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
24 COMMERCENTRE DR TO
OLYMPUS NP 35 37.5 31.4 28-37 65.9 ESTABLISH AND POST 35 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE
COMMERCECENTRE DRIVE
25 ALTON PKWY TO
BAKE PKWY 45 45 47.2 42.5 38-47 79.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 26 BAKE PKWY TO
DIMENSION DR 45 45 46.0 42.2 38-47 75.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
DIMENSION DRIVE
27 MONARCH BLVD-CATALINA TO
BAKE PKWY 35 35 37.1 32.6 30-39 73.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 28 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 47.1 43.0 39-48 69.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
EL TORO ROAD
29 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 40 40 42.0 36.4 33-42 61.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 30 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLANDS BLVD 45 40 47.0 42.2 39-48 65.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 31 MUIRLANDS BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 50 45 53.3 48.0 45-54 61.3 REDUCE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED LIMIT 32 JERONIMO RD TO
TOLEDO WAY 50 45 54.9 50.5 47-56 72.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 33 TOLEDO WAY TO
TRABUCO RD 50 45 54.9 49.4 46-55 63.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 34 TRABUCO RD TO
ALISO PARK DR 50 45 54.1 49.0 45-54 67.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 35 ALISO PARK DR TO
NORTHCREST DR 55 50 58.6 52.6 49-58 57.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR NP = NOT POSTED
34 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
EL TORO ROAD Continued
36 NORTHCREST DR TO
NORMANDALE DR 55 50 58.6 53.5 50-59 65.2 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 37 NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA
PKWY/SANTA MARGARITA PKWY 55 50 59.9 53.7 50-59 58.4 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 38 PORTOLA PKWY/SANTA MARGARITA
PKWY TO MARGUERITE PKWY 55 50 57.4 52.1 50-59 61.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 39 GLENN RANCH RD TO
RIDGELINE RD 50 50 55.5 49.6 46-55 63.7 NO CHANGE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
GLENN RANCH ROAD
40 PORTOLA PKWY TO
SADDLEBACK RANCH RD 55 50 59.0 54.5 51-60 73.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 41 SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO
EL TORO RD 50 50 52.0 48.1 43-52 76.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
GOWDY AVENUE
42 CAVANAUGH RD TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 30 30 31.7 28.5 24-33 87.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
JERONIMO LANE
43 BAKE LANE TO
CAYUGA LANE 25 25 27.8 23.5 18-27 78.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
JERONIMO ROAD
44 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 49.2 44.4 41-50 76.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 45 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 / *25 40 46.6 42.4 38-47 80.7 REDUCE– CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS 46 RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 45 40 46.5 42.3 38-47 77.2 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 47 EL TORO RD TO
LOS ALISOS BLVD 45 40 45.8 41.3 37-46 76.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
35 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
LAKE CENTRE DR-MERCURY RD
48 LAKE FOREST DR TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 30 30 31.1 26.4 23-32 71.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
LAKE FOREST DRIVE
49 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 40 40 40.5 36.0 32-41 71.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 50 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLANDS BLVD 45 45 46.6 42.8 39-48 78.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 51 MUIRLANDS BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 50 45 54.9 50.1 47-56 71.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 52 JERONIMO RD TO
TOLEDO RD 50 45 53.5 48.7 44-53 71.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 53 TOLEDO RD TO
TRABUCO RD 50 45 52.9 48.6 45-54 74.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 54 TRABUCO RD TO
PITTSFORD DR 50 45 52.5 47.9 45-54 64.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 55 PITTSFORD DR TO
DIMENSION DR 50 45 52.8 47.1 43-52 62.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 56 DIMENSION DR TO
TOWNE CENTRE DR 50 45 52.5 48.0 45-54 69.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 57 TOWNE CENTRE DR TO
PORTOLA PKWY 45 WB 45 46.2 42.3 38-47 82.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 58 PORTOLA PKWY TO
BAKE PKWY 45 40 49.3 44.9 41-50 79.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
LAMBERT STREET
59 ASPAN ST TO
LAKE FOREST DR 30 30 33.1 26.4 21-30 67.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE WB = WESTBOUND
36 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD
60 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
ROCKFIELD BLVD 50 45 44.4 39.0 35-44 65.6 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 61 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLANDS BLVD
45EB &
50WB 45 48.3 43.1 39-48 65.5 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE – REMOVE 50 MPH SIGN WB 62 MUIRLANDS BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 45 / *25 45 48.0 43.5 40-49 72.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 63 JERONIMO RD TO
MADERO 45 45 47.4 43.3 40-49 73.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
MONARCH BOULEVARD
64 ALTON PKWY TO
DIMENSION DR 35 30 39.7 35.2 33-42 77.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
MONTCLIFF DRIVE
65 RIMHURST DR TO
EL TORO RD 30 30 31.1 26.7 23-32 81.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD
66 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 49.8 44.3 40-49 67.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 67 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 45 46.7 41.6 38-47 71.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 68 RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 45 40 48.3 44.3 40-49 82.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 69 EL TORO RD TO
LOS ALISOS BLVD 45 40 46.8 42.6 39-48 74.2 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
NORMANDALE STREET
70 OSTERMAN RD TO
EL TORO RD 35 35 39.6 34.7 29-38 74.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
OLYMPUS
71 SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO
CIVIC CENTER DR NP 25 27.0 23.6 20-29 91.4 ESTABLISH AND POST 25 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE EB = EASTBOUND, WB = WESTBOUND, NP = NOT POSTED, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE 37 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
OSTERMAN ROAD
72 REGENCY LANE TO
PITTSFORD DR 35 35 36.2 32.6 28-37 79.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
OVERLAKE
73 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 25 25 29.7 24.6 20-29 83.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PALMWOOD DRIVE
74 PEACHWOOD (N) TO
PEACHWOOD (S) 35 30 33.9 28.7 25-34 78.0 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE PALOMA
75 PORTOLA PKWY TO
ALTON PKWY 35 35 39.6 35.0 32-41 72.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PASEO SOMBRA
76 TRABUCO RD TO
PASEO CIPRES 35 35 35.8 32.1 28-37 74.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PASEO TRANQUILO
77 TRABUCO RD TO
PASEO CIPRES 35 35 36.8 32.4 29-38 77.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PAULING
78 PORTOLA PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 35 39.6 35.6 31-40 81.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PEACHWOOD
79 TRABUCO RD TO
TAMARISK (E) 45 45 47.4 43.2 38-47 68.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
PITTSFORD DRIVE
80 NORTHCREST DR TO
LAKE FOREST DR 35 / *25 30 39.1 34.6 30-39 80.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone
38 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
PORTOLA PARKWAY
81 EL TORO RD TO
SR-241 50 45 51.0 46.5 43-52 67.5 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY WITH SANTA MARGARITA PKWY 82 SR-241 TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 48.1 43.5 39-48 71.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 83 LAKE FOREST DR TO
BAKE PKWY 45 45 47.3 43.1 39-48 73.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 84 BAKE PKWY TO
ALTON PKWY 45 45 47.3 42.5 38-47 72.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 85 ALTON PKWY TO
NORTH CITY LIMIT 45 45 49.3 44.4 39-48 73.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RANCHO PARKWAY
86 BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 45 47.3 43.2 39-48 71.5 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 87 LAKE FOREST DR TO
PORTOLA PKWY 45 40 46.7 42.3 38-47 72.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
RANCHO PARKWAY SOUTH
88 ALTON PKWY TO
BAKE PKWY 40 40 44.9 39.0 35-44 70.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
REGENCY LANE
89 LAKE FOREST DR TO
NORMANDALE DR 35 35 39.9 36.0 31-40 82.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RIDGELINE ROAD
90 SANTIAGO CANYON RD TO
SADDLEBACK RANCH RD 35 35 37.9 33.8 29-38 80.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 91 SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO
EL TORO RD 40 40 42.2 38.3 34-43 82.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 39 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
RIDGE ROUTE DRIVE
92 ROCKFIELD BLVD TO
MUIRLAND BLVD 40 35 42.9 38.4 34-43 76.5 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 93 MUIRLAND BLVD TO
JERONIMO RD 40 35 43.1 38.3 35-44 72.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 94 JERONIMO RD TO
TOLEDO WAY 40 / *25 35 43.6 39.3 35-44 78.3 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 95 TOLEDO WAY TO
TRABUCO RD 40 / *25 35 42.4 38.1 34-43 75.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
RIMHURST DRIVE
96 TRABUCO RD TO
RIMGATE DR 25 25 29.8 25.6 21-30 80.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
ROCKFIELD BOULEVARD
97 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
LAKE FOREST DR 45 40 43.5 39.0 36-45 82.3 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 98 LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 40 45.8 40.3 36-45 73.5 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 99 RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
CAVANAUGH RD 45 40 46.1 41.6 37-46 76.0 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 100
CAVANAUGH RD TO
SILVERBAY DR 40 40 40.7 34.4 30-39 67.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 101
SILVERBAY DR TO
LOS ALISOS BL 40 40 43.5 38.7 35-44 79.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RUE DE FORTUNA
102
BAKE PKWY TO
RUE DE VALORE 35 / *25 35 39.2 34.1 29-38 70.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
RUE DE VALORE
103
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RUE DE FORTUNA 35 35 37.8 33.1 29-38 73.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone
40 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
AVERAGE
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
SADDLEBACK RANCH ROAD
104
GLENN RANCH RD TO
MILLWOOD RD 45 40 44.6 41.1 37-46 82.9 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 105
MILLWOOD RD TO
PENDLETON RD 40 / *25 35 44.5 40.7 37-46 79.5 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS 106
PENDLETON RD TO
RIDGELINE RD 35 / *25 30 37.8 32.8 28-37 74.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
SANTA MARGARITA PARKWAY
107
EL TORO RD TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 50 45 51.2 46.6 43-52 72.3 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD
108
RIDGELINE RD TO
NORTH CITY LIMITS 55 50 59.1 53.0 49-58 66.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
SERRANO ROAD
109
TOLEDO WAY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 40 / *25 35 41.5 37.5 34-43 83.7 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 110
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 35 / *25 30 38.9 34.8 31-40 78.8 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 111
RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 35 / *25 30 39.3 34.7 31-40 74.4 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR
SERRANO SUMMIT DRIVE
112
COMMERCENTRE DR TO
OLYMPUS NP 35 39.9 35.3 31-40 78.8 ESTABLISH AND POST 35 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE
TAMARISK
113
PEACHWOOD SOUTH TO
PEACHWOOD NORTH 30 25 29.9 26.3 23-32 81.8 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE
TOLEDO LANE
114
BAKE PKWY TO
CUL-DE-SAC 25 25 27.0 23.4 19-28 86.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone , NP = NOT POSTED 41 STREET LOCATION
EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT
RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED
AVERAGE
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE
PERCENT
OF VEHICLES
IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION
TOLEDO WAY
115
BAKE PKWY TO
LAKE FOREST DR 50 45 48.7 44.6 41-50 78.0 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 116
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 45 / *25 45 48.3 43.9 39-48 73.5 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 117
RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 45 / *25 40 45.5 41.0 37-46 74.6 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(2) HIGH PED & BIKE USERS
TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
118
ALTON PKWY WEST TO
ALTON PKWY EAST 45 40 44.9 40.2 35-44 70.3 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE 119
ALTON PKWY EAST TO
BAKE PKWY 35 35 39.0 34.6 30-39 81.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 120
BAKE PKWY TO
PORTOLA PKWY-PAULING 35 35 38.9 34.7 32-41 79.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE
TRABUCO ROAD
121
BAKE PKWY TO
PEACHWOOD 55 50 55.5 48.3 44-53 60.9 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 122
PEACHWOOD TO
LAKE FOREST DR 50 45 52.4 48.5 45-54 80.5 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 123
LAKE FOREST DR TO
RIDGE ROUTE DR 50 45 50.2 45.7 42-51 73.1 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY 124
RIDGE ROUTE DR TO
EL TORO RD 50 45 50.4 44.8 42-51 73.3 REDUCE – CVC 22358.7(a)(1) SAFETY CORRIDOR 125
EL TORO RD TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 45 45 48.5 44.1 40-49 70.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone
APPENDIX A
35 40
45 50
35 50
50 50
55 5050
40 50
40 50
50 50
40 35
40 35
35 30
30 45
40 45
45 50
45 50
50 50
50 50
50 30
45 40
40 40
45 45
45 45
45 45
45 40
30 45
454545
45 45
40 40
35 35
25 30
35 35
35 35
45 30
45 45
45 45
45 40
40 3535
40 35
3535
3525
40 40
40 40
40 40
35 35
50 35
30 30
30 45
45 45
40 40
35 50
45 45
45 45
25 50
25 30
25 35
40 45
40 35
SPEED LIMIT MAP
2024
CITY OF LAKE FOREST
45 45
45 30
40 40
45 45
30 30
55 60
40 35
2535
35 45
APPENDIX B
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALISO PARK DR - NORTHCREST DR EL TORO RD (W) TO EL TORO RD (E) DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / *25 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.24
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO (W) / EL TORO (E)
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO (W) / PITTSFORD (sch) / EL TORO (E-sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy near Midcrest)
OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME
30 MIN PARKING SCHOOL DAYS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE (Midcrest to El Toro (E) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PARTIAL SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / MONTBURY PARK / ELEM SCHOOL (on Pittsford & Northcrest) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Aliso Park-Northcrest 2024-01 The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.60 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALISO PARK DR - NORTHCREST DR EL TORO RD (W) TO EL TORO RD (E) DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.7% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.4% 98.3%
X X X 3 2.6% 94.8%
X X 2 1.7% 92.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 2.6% 94.8%
X X 2 1.7% 92.2%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 90.5%
40 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 81.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 73.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 65.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 54.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.6% 46.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.3% 37.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 27.6%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 19.8%
X X X X 4 3.4% 15.5%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 12.1%
X X 2 1.7% 6.9%
X X X 3 2.6% 5.2%
X 1 0.9% 2.6%
X X 2 1.7% 1.7%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. 0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 116
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
File: Aliso Park-Northcrest 2024-01
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALISO PARK DR - NORTHCREST DR EL TORO RD (W) TO EL TORO RD (E) DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.3%
43 X 94.8%
HCI
43 X 94.8%
42 X 92.2%
41 X 90.5% }PACE
40 X 86.2% }PACE
39 X 81.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 73.3% }PACE
37 X 65.5% }PACE
36 X 54.3% }PACE
35 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 37.9% }PACE
33 X 27.6% }PACE
32 X 19.8% }PACE
31 X 15.5%
30 X 12.1% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 6.9%
28 X 5.2%
27 X 2.6%
26 X 1.7%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. X 0.0% 22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.5 %
File: Aliso Park-Northcrest 2024-01
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT TO TOWNE CENTRE DR (W)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MONARCH
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 61.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 53 - 62 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 60 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.23
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE / MONARCH / CATALINA / TOWNE CTR-RANCHO (S)
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / MONARCH / CATALINA / TOWNE CTR-RANCHO (S) 23,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / MONARCH / CATALINA / TOWNE CTR-RANCHO (S)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
OVERHEAD PED XING (e/o Monarch)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-02
This segment of Alton Parkway is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 61.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 60 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 60 mph speed limit be reduced to 55 mph.
0.90 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT TO TOWNE CENTRE DR (W)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X X 2 0.8% 99.6%
X 1 0.4% 98.7%
65 X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 98.3%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 95.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.8% 92.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.9% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.5% 82.8%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.1% 77.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 8.8% 70.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.6% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 8.4% 53.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.3% 45.4%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.7% 39.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.7% 32.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.0% 25.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.2% 20.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.4% 16.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 3.8% 13.0%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 9.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.5% 6.3%
X X X X X 5 2.1% 3.8%
X X X 3 1.3% 1.7%
45 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 238
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 62 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 61.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 56.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.6 %
File: Alton 2024-02
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT TO TOWNE CENTRE DR (W)
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 99.6%
66 X 98.7%
65 X 98.3%
64 X 95.4%
63 X 92.4%
62 X 88.7%
61 X 82.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
60 X 77.3% }PACE
59 X 70.2% }PACE
58 X 61.3% }PACE
57 X 53.8% }PACE
56 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
55 X 39.1% }PACE
54 X 32.4% }PACE
53 X 25.6% }PACE
52 X 20.6%
51 X 16.4%
50 X 13.0% - - - - - -15PCT
49 X 9.2%
48 X 6.3%
47 X 3.8%
46 X 1.7%
45 X 0.4%
44 X 0.0%
43 X 0.0%
HCI
43 X 0.0%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 62 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 61.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 56.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.6 %
A - 2
Alton 2024-02
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO (S) TO SR 241
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SR 241
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH (WB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.83
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
20,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOWNE CENTRE-RANCHO PKWY / SUNFLOWER / SR 241
CROSSWALKS AT TOWNE CENTRE-RANCHO PKWY
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-03
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 0.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 50 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.29 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO (S) TO SR 241
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
55 X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 97.7%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 94.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 92.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 88.5%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 76.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 56.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 47.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 38.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 29.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 17.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 17.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 11.5%
40 X X X X X X 6 3.4% 7.5%
X X X X 4 2.3% 4.0%
X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
0 0.0% 0.6%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.5 %
File: Alton 2024-03
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR-RANCHO (S) TO SR 241
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.4%
55 X 98.9%
54 X 97.7%
53 X 94.8%
52 X 92.0%
51 X 88.5% }PACE
50 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
49 X 76.4% }PACE
48 X 67.2% }PACE
47 X 56.3% }PACE
46 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 38.5% }PACE
44 X 29.9% }PACE
43 X 24.1% }PACE
HCI
43 X 24.1% }PACE
42 X 17.2% }PACE
41 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 7.5%
39 X 4.0%
38 X 1.7%
37 X 0.6%
36 X 0.6%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.5 %
A - 2
Alton 2024-03
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY SR 241 TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOWNE CTR
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.67
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
20,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA / TOWNE CTR (N) / SR 241
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / TOWNE CTR (N)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - YES / NO (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-04
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY SR 241 TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X X 3 1.3% 100.0%
55 X X X X 4 1.8% 98.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 96.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.3% 92.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.4% 80.9%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.0% 72.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.6% 64.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.1% 56.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.0% 49.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.1% 41.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.8% 34.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.3% 28.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.4% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 19.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.4% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.0% 19.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.9% 15.1%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 6.7%
X X X X 4 1.8% 4.0%
X X X 3 1.3% 2.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.9%
35 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 225
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.6 %
File: Alton 2024-04
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY SR 241 TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 98.7%
54 X 96.9%
53 X 92.9% }PACE
52 X 87.6% }PACE
51 X 80.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 72.4% }PACE
49 X 64.4% }PACE
48 X 56.9% }PACE
47 X 49.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 41.8% }PACE
45 X 34.7% }PACE
44 X 28.9% }PACE
43 X 23.6%
HCI
44 X 28.9% }PACE
43 X 23.6%
42 X 19.1%
41 X 15.1%
40 X 10.2% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 6.7%
38 X 4.0%
37 X 2.2%
36 X 0.9%
35 X 0.4%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.6 %
Alton 2024-04
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO PALOMA-ROMANO
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SANTA RITA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.38
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.77
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1-2 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes Portola to Odessa) 2,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1-2 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes Portola to Odessa)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NOT RESTRICTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER NO STOPPING OVER 2 AXLE OR 22' LONG OR 7' HIGH
POSTED PLAY GROUND ADVISORY SIGN
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL DBL YELLOW & SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINES
PAINTED ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / ALTON PARK
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alton 2024-05
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO PALOMA-ROMANO
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X X 2 1.7% 98.3%
X X X X 4 3.3% 96.7%
45 X X X 3 2.5% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 90.9%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 81.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 4.1% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 81.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 74.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 66.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 57.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 49.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 38.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 31.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 24.0%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 14.9%
X X X 3 2.5% 10.7%
X X X 3 2.5% 8.3%
X X X X 4 3.3% 5.8%
30 X X X 3 2.5% 2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
File: Alton 2024-05
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ALTON PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO PALOMA-ROMANO
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.2%
47 X 98.3%
46 X 96.7%
45 X 93.4%
44 X 90.9% }PACE
43 X 86.0% }PACE
HCI
44 X 90.9% }PACE
43 X 86.0% }PACE
42 X 81.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 74.4% }PACE
40 X 66.9% }PACE
39 X 57.9% }PACE
38 X 49.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.8% }PACE
36 X 31.4% }PACE
35 X 24.0% }PACE
34 X 14.9% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 10.7%
32 X 8.3%
31 X 5.8%
30 X 2.5%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
Alton 2024-05
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ASPAN STREET MUIRLANDS BL TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF LAMBERT
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.53
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 1.60
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
4,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO (except Delivery Trucks)
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of) / NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE (btwn Center to Lambert) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (at curve)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE ROADWAY
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Aspan 2024-06
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 3.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ASPAN STREET MUIRLANDS BL TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X X X 4 2.6% 96.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 94.2%
40 X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 92.3%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 87.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.7% 80.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 71.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.3% 67.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 71.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.3% 67.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.4% 54.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.3% 41.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.5% 31.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.7% 25.2%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 17.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.8% 14.2%
X X X 3 1.9% 8.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 6.5%
25 X X X X 4 2.6% 4.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 155
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
File: Aspan 2024-06
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
ASPAN STREET MUIRLANDS BL TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.7%
43 X 98.1%
42 X 96.8%
41 X 94.2%
40 X 92.3%
39 X 87.7%
38 X 84.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
38 X 84.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
37 X 80.6% }PACE
36 X 71.0% }PACE
35 X 67.1% }PACE
34 X 54.8% }PACE
33 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 41.9% }PACE
31 X 31.6% }PACE
30 X 25.2% }PACE
29 X 17.4% }PACE
28 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 8.4%
26 X 6.5%
25 X 4.5%
24 X 1.9%
23 X 1.3%
22 X 0.6%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
Aspan 2024-06
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE LANE TOLEDO LANE TO JERONIMO LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ONTARIO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH Advisory (at East end and West end)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS NONE
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES / YES
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake Ln 2024-07
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 4.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE LANE TOLEDO LANE TO JERONIMO LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 98.2%
X 1 0.9% 97.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 96.5%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 91.2%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 86.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 81.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 76.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 68.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 60.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 51.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 32.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 25.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 17.5%
20 X X X X X 5 4.4% 12.3%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 7.9%
X X X 3 2.6% 3.5%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.3 %
File: Bake Ln 2024-07
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE LANE TOLEDO LANE TO JERONIMO LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:20 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 98.2%
33 X 97.4%
32 X 96.5%
31 X 91.2%
30 X 86.8% }PACE
29 X 81.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 76.3% }PACE
27 X 68.4% }PACE
26 X 60.5% }PACE
25 X 51.8% }PACE
24 X 42.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 32.5% }PACE
22 X 25.4% }PACE
21 X 17.5% }PACE
20 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
19 X 7.9%
18 X 3.5%
17 X 0.9%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.3 %
Bake Ln 2024-07
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT (w/o JERONIMO) TO TOLEDO WAY DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 23 4.60 0.51
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
61,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES NO / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake pkwy 2024-08
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.40 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT (w/o JERONIMO) TO TOLEDO WAY DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
55 X X X 3 1.5% 98.5%
X X X X X 5 2.4% 97.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.3% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.9% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.8% 84.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.8% 77.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.8% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.3% 61.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.8% 51.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.8% 42.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.3% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.9% 27.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.3% 22.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.9% 15.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.4% 11.7%
40 X X X X 4 2.0% 7.3%
X X X X 4 2.0% 5.4%
X X X X 4 2.0% 3.4%
X 1 0.5% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
35 X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 205
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.0 %
File: Bake pkwy 2024-08
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY WEST CITY LIMIT (w/o JERONIMO) TO TOLEDO WAY DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.5%
55 X 98.5%
54 X 97.1%
53 X 94.6% }PACE
52 X 88.3% }PACE
51 X 84.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 77.6% }PACE
49 X 69.8% }PACE
48 X 61.0% }PACE
47 X 51.7% }PACE
46 X 42.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
45 X 36.1% }PACE
44 X 27.8% }PACE
43 X 22.0%
42 X 15.6%
41 X 11.7% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 7.3%
39 X 5.4%
38 X 3.4%
HCI
38 X 3.4%
37 X 1.5%
36 X 1.0%
35 X 0.5%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 51.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 46.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.0 %
Bake pkwy 2024-08
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 53.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH (EB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 3 0.60 0.09
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 2 0.40 0.06
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.06
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 23 4.60 0.67
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
44,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / CALLE ENTRADA / TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / CALLE ENTRADA / TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F + NF = FRONTING + NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-09
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 3.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.43 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X 1 0.5% 99.1%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.6%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 97.2%
55 X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 94.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.8% 79.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.3% 70.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 9.8% 60.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.9% 51.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.8% 43.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.0% 34.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.0% 27.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.6% 20.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 14.9%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 11.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 8.4%
X X X X 4 1.9% 5.6%
40 X X X 3 1.4% 3.7%
X X 2 0.9% 2.3%
X X 2 0.9% 1.4%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 215
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
File: Bake 2024-09
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 99.1%
57 X 98.6%
56 X 97.2%
55 X 94.9%
54 X 91.2% }PACE
53 X 85.1% }PACE
52 X 79.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 70.2% }PACE
50 X 60.9% }PACE
49 X 51.2% }PACE
48 X 43.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 34.4% }PACE
46 X 27.4% }PACE
45 X 20.5% }PACE
44 X 14.9% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 11.2%
42 X 8.4%
41 X 5.6%
40 X 3.7%
39 X 2.3%
38 X 1.4%
HCI
38 X 1.4%
37 X 0.5%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.9 %
Bake 2024-09
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TRABUCO RD TO SOUTH POINT DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SOUTH POINTE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.30
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes btwn Artists to S.Pointe) 30,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION (2 Lanes btwn Artists to S.Pointe)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO / ARTISTS / SOUTH POINTE
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / ARTISTS / SOUTH POINTE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE (at South Pointe)
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - YES / NO (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake 2024-10
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TRABUCO RD TO SOUTH POINT DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
55 X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 98.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 94.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.7% 90.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 84.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.8% 75.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.3% 67.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 11.3% 56.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.3% 45.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 27.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 20.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.2% 16.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 9.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 6.7%
X X X X 4 2.1% 3.6%
40 X X 2 1.0% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 194
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
File: Bake 2024-10
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TRABUCO RD TO SOUTH POINT DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:35 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.5%
55 X 98.5%
54 X 94.8%
53 X 90.7% }PACE
52 X 84.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 75.8% }PACE
50 X 67.0% }PACE
49 X 56.7% }PACE
48 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 36.1% }PACE
46 X 27.8% }PACE
45 X 20.6% }PACE
44 X 16.0% }PACE
43 X 9.8% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 6.7%
41 X 3.6%
40 X 1.5%
39 X 0.5%
38 X 0.0%
HCI
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
Bake 2024-10
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY SOUTH POINTE DR TO NORTH POINTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SOUTH POINTE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH (EB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLSIONS 7 1.40 0.33
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
29,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SOUTH POINTE / NORTH POINTE
CROSSWALKS AT SOUTH POINTE / NORTH POINTE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL (EB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / CHURCH
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake 2024-11
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and a church. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 54.2 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 46 to 55 mph, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY SOUTH POINTE DR TO NORTH POINTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.9% 99.5%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 97.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.7% 94.8%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.6% 90.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.5% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.6% 75.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.5% 69.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.5% 60.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.5% 52.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 43.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 37.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.2% 31.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.2% 26.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.2% 21.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.2% 16.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.8% 11.8%
X X X X X X 6 2.8% 8.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 5.2%
40 X X X X 4 1.9% 3.8%
X X 2 0.9% 1.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 212
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
File: Bake 2024-11
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY SOUTH POINTE DR TO NORTH POINTE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.5%
57 X 97.6%
56 X 94.8%
55 X 90.1% }PACE
54 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 75.9% }PACE
52 X 69.3% }PACE
51 X 60.8% }PACE
50 X 52.4% }PACE
49 X 43.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
48 X 37.7% }PACE
47 X 31.6% }PACE
46 X 26.4% }PACE
45 X 21.2%
44 X 16.0%
43 X 11.8% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 8.0%
41 X 5.2%
40 X 3.8%
39 X 1.9%
38 X 0.9%
HCI
38 X 0.9%
37 X 0.5%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
Bake 2024-11
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY NORTH POINTE DR TO COMMERCENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COMMERCENTRE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 48 - 57 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 13 2.60 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORTH POINTE / COMMERCENTRE
CROSSWALKS AT NORTH POINTE / COMMERCENTRE
27,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT NORTH POINTE / COMMERCENTRE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL GRADE (EB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
File: Bake 2024-12
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 55.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY NORTH POINTE DR TO COMMERCENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.8% 99.5%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 97.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 94.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.3% 89.4%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.8% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.3% 67.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 60.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.4% 53.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.7% 46.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 38.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 31.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 25.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 20.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 15.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 11.0%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 7.8%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 4.6%
X X 2 0.9% 2.3%
40 X 1 0.5% 1.4%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 218
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
File: Bake 2024-12
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY NORTH POINTE DR TO COMMERCENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 97.7%
57 X 94.5% }PACE
56 X 89.4% }PACE
55 X 82.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 75.2% }PACE
53 X 67.4% }PACE
52 X 60.1% }PACE
51 X 53.2% }PACE
50 X 46.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
49 X 38.1% }PACE
48 X 31.2% }PACE
47 X 25.2%
46 X 20.2%
45 X 15.6%
44 X 11.0% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 7.8%
42 X 4.6%
41 X 2.3%
40 X 1.4%
39 X 0.9%
38 X 0.5%
HCI
38 X 0.5%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
Bake 2024-12
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY COMMERCENTRE DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BAFFIN BAY
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 48 - 57 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.11
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 18 3.60 0.64
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE / DIMENSION
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / DIMENSION
24,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-13
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and business. Field observations included bike lanes, no stopping any time, gradual to moderate horizontal-vertical roadway curves and areas of limited sight distance at roadway curves. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 48 to 57 mph. With areas of limited sight distance and to maintain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.64 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY COMMERCENTRE DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 99.4%
60 X X X X 4 2.3% 98.3%
X X X X 4 2.3% 96.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 93.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 90.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 85.6%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.5% 60.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 48.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 40.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 32.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 16.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 10.3%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 6.3%
45 X X X 3 1.7% 3.4%
X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
File: Bake 2024-13
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY COMMERCENTRE DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:40 AM - 10:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 99.4%
60 X 98.3%
59 X 96.0%
58 X 93.7%
57 X 90.2% }PACE
56 X 85.6% }PACE
55 X 79.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 71.3% }PACE
53 X 60.3% }PACE
52 X 48.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 40.2% }PACE
50 X 32.8% }PACE
49 X 23.6% }PACE
48 X 16.7% }PACE
47 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 6.3%
45 X 3.4%
44 X 1.7%
43 X 0.6%
HCI
43 X 0.6%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
Bake 2024-13
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LUPALA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 56.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 48 - 57 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.20
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 30 6.00 0.76
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSION / EMI WY-RANCH PKWY (S) / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE 25,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSION / EMI WY-RANCH PKWY (S) / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE
CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSION / EMI WY-RANCH PKWY (S) / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - YES / FEW (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-14
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and residential (non- fronting). Field observations include bike lanes, no stopping any time, and slight to gradual roadway curves. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 56.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.84 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.5%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
0 0.0% 99.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.0%
60 X X X 3 1.5% 97.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.1% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 87.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 80.5%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.2% 72.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.7% 63.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 54.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.2% 46.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 36.9%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 29.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 18.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 12.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 8.2%
45 X X X X X 5 2.6% 4.1%
X X 2 1.0% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 195
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 56.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.8 %
File: Bake 2024-14
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.5%
63 X 99.5%
62 X 99.0%
61 X 99.0%
60 X 97.9%
59 X 96.4%
58 X 92.8%
57 X 87.7% }PACE
56 X 80.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
55 X 72.3% }PACE
54 X 63.1% }PACE
53 X 54.4% }PACE
52 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 36.9% }PACE
50 X 29.7% }PACE
49 X 24.1% }PACE
48 X 18.5% }PACE
47 X 12.8% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 8.2%
45 X 4.1%
44 X 1.5%
43 X 0.5%
HCI
44 X 1.5%
43 X 0.5%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 57 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 56.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.8 %
Bake 2024-14
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PORTOLA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (WB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.43
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 1.58
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
15,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOWN CENTRE / PORTOLA
CROSSWALKS AT TOWN CENTRE / PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - YES / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-15
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.24 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.3% 99.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.1% 97.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 92.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 85.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 77.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 68.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 77.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 68.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 58.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 50.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 39.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 31.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 22.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 16.0%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 10.3%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 5.7%
X X 2 1.1% 2.3%
X X 2 1.1% 1.1%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 175
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
File: Bake 2024-15
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY TOWNE CENTRE DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.4%
46 X 97.1%
45 X 92.0% }PACE
44 X 85.7% }PACE
43 X 77.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
HCI
44 X 85.7% }PACE
43 X 77.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 68.0% }PACE
41 X 58.9% }PACE
40 X 50.3% }PACE
39 X 39.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 31.4% }PACE
37 X 22.3% }PACE
36 X 16.0% }PACE
35 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 5.7%
33 X 2.3%
32 X 1.1%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.3 %
Bake 2024-15
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BURBANK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.19
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.19
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
11,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA / RUE DE FORTUNA
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / RUE DE FORTUNA (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT SLIGHT "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / LIBRARY / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-16
This segment of Bake Parkway is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and a library. Field notes include a constant slight “C” curve. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.1 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 36 to 45 mph, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.26 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 98.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 96.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 91.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.8% 75.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 66.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.8% 75.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.2% 66.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 56.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 48.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.9% 40.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 33.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 25.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 20.1%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 12.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 8.0%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 4.6%
X X X 3 1.7% 1.7%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.6 %
File: Bake 2024-16
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY PORTOLA PKWY TO RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 98.9%
46 X 96.0%
45 X 91.4% }PACE
44 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 75.9% }PACE
HCI
44 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 75.9% }PACE
42 X 66.1% }PACE
41 X 56.9% }PACE
40 X 48.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
39 X 40.2% }PACE
38 X 33.3% }PACE
37 X 25.9% }PACE
36 X 20.1% }PACE
35 X 12.6% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 8.0%
33 X 4.6%
32 X 1.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 40.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.6 %
Bake 2024-16
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY RUE DE FORTUNE TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF RUE DE FORTUNE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.49
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.49
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
4,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RUE DE FORTUNA, STOP - LAKE FOREST CROSSWALKS AT RUE DE FORTUNA (sch) / LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEIDAN ISLAND & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Bake 2024-17
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.23 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY RUE DE FORTUNE TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.7%
X 1 0.7% 96.6%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.0%
45 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 94.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 85.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 79.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 85.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.4% 71.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 61.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.4% 53.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 44.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 36.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 28.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 21.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 15.4%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 10.7%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 7.4%
X X X X 4 2.7% 3.4%
30 X 1 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.7 %
File: Bake 2024-17
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BAKE PARKWAY RUE DE FORTUNE TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 98.7%
47 X 96.6%
46 X 96.0%
45 X 94.0%
44 X 89.9%
43 X 85.9% }PACE
HCI
44 X 89.9%
43 X 85.9% }PACE
42 X 79.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 71.1% }PACE
40 X 61.7% }PACE
39 X 53.7% }PACE
38 X 44.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 36.2% }PACE
36 X 28.2% }PACE
35 X 21.5% }PACE
34 X 15.4% }PACE
33 X 10.7% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 7.4%
31 X 3.4%
30 X 0.7%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.7 %
Bake 2024-17
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BURBANK BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LAKE FOREST
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 36.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 85.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - BAKE / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE TO SWEEPING "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Burbank 2024-18
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 1.3 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.33 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BURBANK BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
40 X X X 3 2.5% 98.3%
X X X 3 2.5% 95.8%
X X X X 4 3.3% 93.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.7% 90.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 83.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 74.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 83.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 74.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.8% 65.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.2% 54.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.7% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.5% 33.3%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.0% 25.8%
X X X X X X X 7 5.8% 15.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 10.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 5.0%
X X 2 1.7% 2.5%
25 X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 120
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.0 %
File: Burbank 2024-18
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
BURBANK BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 99.2%
40 X 98.3%
39 X 95.8%
38 X 93.3%
HCI
38 X 93.3%
37 X 90.0% }PACE
36 X 83.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
35 X 74.2% }PACE
34 X 65.0% }PACE
33 X 54.2% }PACE
32 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 33.3% }PACE
30 X 25.8% }PACE
29 X 15.8% }PACE
28 X 10.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 5.0%
26 X 2.5%
25 X 0.8%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.0 %
Burbank 2024-18
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO BIRENDA
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BIRENDA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 86.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
35 MPH (Advisory at Curves)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.13
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 1.03
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
5,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (EB) - FEW / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Canada 2024-19
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.79 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO BIRENDA
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
45 X X X X X 5 4.4% 98.2%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 93.9%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 88.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.4% 82.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 71.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.2% 63.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.3% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 37.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.5% 28.9%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 18.4%
35 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 13.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 18.4%
35 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 13.2%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 7.9%
0 0.0% 3.5%
X X 2 1.8% 3.5%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
30 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
File: Canada 2024-19
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO BIRENDA
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.2%
44 X 93.9% }PACE
43 X 88.6% }PACE
42 X 82.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 71.1% }PACE
40 X 63.2% }PACE
39 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 37.7% }PACE
HCI
38 X 37.7% }PACE
37 X 28.9% }PACE
36 X 18.4% }PACE
35 X 13.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 7.9%
33 X 3.5%
32 X 3.5%
31 X 1.8%
30 X 0.9%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.9 %
Canada 2024-19
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD BIRENDA TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SERRANO CT
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH (WB)
35 MPH (Advisory at Curves)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.35
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.35
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
4,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSIONS
CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSIONS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Areas of)
NO RV PARKING / NO OVERNIGHT VEHICLES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) - PARTIAL / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS (at Dimensions) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Canada 2024-20
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 40 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.33 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD BIRENDA TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
45 X X X X X 5 4.0% 98.4%
X X X 3 2.4% 94.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 92.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.2% 81.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.0% 74.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.2% 66.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.6% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.6% 45.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 36.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 29.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 36.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 29.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 14.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 8.0%
X 1 0.8% 2.4%
30 X 1 0.8% 1.6%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 125
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.0 %
File: Canada 2024-20
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CAÑADA ROAD BIRENDA TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.4%
44 X 94.4%
43 X 92.0%
42 X 87.2% }PACE
41 X 81.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
40 X 74.4% }PACE
39 X 66.4% }PACE
38 X 55.2% }PACE
HCI
38 X 55.2% }PACE
37 X 45.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 36.0% }PACE
35 X 29.6% }PACE
34 X 20.8% }PACE
33 X 14.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.0%
31 X 2.4%
30 X 1.6%
29 X 0.8%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.0 %
Canada 2024-20
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CATALINA ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:05 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HERON
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON
CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
2,300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE CONSTANT SWEEPING "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Alton) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ROUNDABOUT AT DIMENSION-CATALINA
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BAKER RANCH COMM PARK / PROMENADE PARK (roundbout) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Catalina 2024-21
This segment of Catalina is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non-fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sweeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
0.55 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CATALINA ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:05 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 98.5%
X X X X 4 3.0% 96.2%
X X X X 4 3.0% 93.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 3.0% 96.2%
X X X X 4 3.0% 93.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 90.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 85.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 78.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.0% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.5% 67.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.0% 60.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 14.3% 51.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.0% 36.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.5% 27.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 20.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8% 15.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 9.0%
X X 2 1.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.5% 2.3%
0 0.0% 0.8%
0 0.0% 0.8%
25 X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 133
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
File: Catalina 2024-21
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CATALINA ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:05 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.5%
43 X 96.2%
HCI
43 X 96.2%
42 X 93.2%
41 X 90.2%
40 X 85.7% }PACE
39 X 78.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 73.7% }PACE
37 X 67.7% }PACE
36 X 60.2% }PACE
35 X 51.1% }PACE
34 X 36.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 27.8% }PACE
32 X 20.3% }PACE
31 X 15.8% }PACE
30 X 9.0% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 3.8%
28 X 2.3%
27 X 0.8%
26 X 0.8%
25 X 0.8%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
A - 2
Catalina 2024-21
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CENTRE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO ASPAN ST
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ROCKFIELD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD, STOP - ASPAN
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO RV PARKING
MANY AREAS OF RED CURB
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE ROADWAY / SHORT SEGMENT
DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL (RESTUARANTS)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Centre 2024-22
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is within 0.2 mph of the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.19 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CENTRE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO ASPAN ST
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 98.0%
40 X X X 3 2.0% 97.3%
X X 2 1.3% 95.3%
X X 2 1.3% 94.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 92.6%
X X X X 4 2.7% 88.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 85.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 2.7% 88.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 85.9%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 81.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 78.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 63.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 57.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 49.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 43.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.4% 34.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 23.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 18.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 10.1%
X X X X 4 2.7% 5.4%
X 1 0.7% 2.7%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
20 X 1 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.4 %
File: Centre 2024-22
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CENTRE DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO ASPAN ST
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:40 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 98.0%
40 X 97.3%
39 X 95.3%
38 X 94.0%
HCI
38 X 94.0%
37 X 92.6%
36 X 88.6%
35 X 85.9%
34 X 81.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
33 X 78.5% }PACE
32 X 69.8% }PACE
31 X 63.1% }PACE
30 X 57.7% }PACE
29 X 49.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 43.6% }PACE
27 X 34.9% }PACE
26 X 23.5% }PACE
25 X 18.8% }PACE
24 X 10.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 5.4%
22 X 2.7%
21 X 2.0%
20 X 0.7%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.4 %
Centre 2024-22
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CHERRY AVENUE JERONIMO RD TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ASHBROOK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
25 MPH (Advisory)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.39
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.39
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 2.33
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO, STOP- 2ND / CEDARSPRING / CRESTBROOK
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / CEDARSPRING / CRESTBROOK
1,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/9/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / CEDARSPRING / CRESTBROOK
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ALISO CREEK PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY (EB)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE - SWEEPING "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
AREAS OF RED CURB
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / GREEN BELT / PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Cherry 2024-23
This segment of Cherry Avenue is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 37.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
0.94 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CHERRY AVENUE JERONIMO RD TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 98.2%
X X 2 1.8% 96.5%
40 X X X X 4 3.5% 94.7%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 86.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 79.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 73.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 67.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 73.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 67.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 59.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 51.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.5% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 31.6%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 23.7%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 18.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 13.2%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 7.9%
X X 2 1.8% 2.6%
25 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.2 %
File: Cherry 2024-23
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CHERRY AVENUE JERONIMO RD TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 4/9/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 98.2%
41 X 96.5%
40 X 94.7%
39 X 91.2%
38 X 86.8% }PACE
HCI
38 X 86.8% }PACE
37 X 79.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 73.7% }PACE
35 X 67.5% }PACE
34 X 59.6% }PACE
33 X 51.8% }PACE
32 X 42.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 31.6% }PACE
30 X 23.7% }PACE
29 X 18.4% }PACE
28 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
27 X 7.9%
26 X 2.6%
25 X 0.9%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.2 %
Cherry 2024-23
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 2:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LUCANIA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT -
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Roundabout) 1,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COMMERCENTRE, YIELD - OLYMPUS (Roundabout)
CROSSWALKS AT COMMERCENTRE / OLYMPUS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE CITY HALL / COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Civic Center 2024-24
This segment of Civic Center Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are City Hall, commercial, industrial and some residential (non-fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a slight horizontal curve and roundabout at Olympus. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 37.5 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 28 to 37 mph, it is recommended that a 35 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 2:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 99.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 96.8%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 96.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 88.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 81.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 74.6%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.8% 69.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 64.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.3% 61.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 55.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.1% 46.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 35.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 28.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.1% 23.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 15.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 10.3%
25 X X X X X 5 4.0% 5.6%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 126
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
File: Civic Center 2024-24
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE COMMERCENTRE DR TO OLYMPUS
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 2:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 99.2%
41 X 96.8%
40 X 96.0%
39 X 90.5%
38 X 88.1%
37 X 81.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 74.6% }PACE
35 X 69.0% }PACE
34 X 64.3% }PACE
33 X 61.9% }PACE
32 X 55.6% }PACE
31 X 46.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
30 X 35.7% }PACE
29 X 28.6% }PACE
28 X 23.0% }PACE
27 X 15.9%
26 X 10.3% - - - - - -15PCT
25 X 5.6%
24 X 1.6%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.9 %
File:Civic Center 2024-24
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF ARTIC OCEAN
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
6,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / ALTON
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / ALTON
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
NO PARKING 12am-6am CLASS A VEHICLES TRACTOR-TRAILORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Commercentre 2024-25
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 96.9%
50 X X X 3 2.3% 96.1%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 93.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 89.9%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 83.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 78.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 72.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 63.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 45.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 35.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 11.6%
X X X X 4 3.1% 4.7%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.7 %
File: Commercentre 2024-25
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE ALTON PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:15 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.2%
51 X 96.9%
50 X 96.1%
49 X 93.8%
48 X 89.9%
47 X 83.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 78.3% }PACE
45 X 72.1% }PACE
44 X 63.6% }PACE
43 X 55.0% }PACE
HCI
43 X 55.0% }PACE
42 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 35.7% }PACE
40 X 25.6% }PACE
39 X 17.1% }PACE
38 X 11.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
37 X 4.7%
36 X 1.6%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.7 %
File:Commercentre 2024-25
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CIVIC CENTER
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.23
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
7,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / SERRANO SUMMIT / CIVIC CENTER / DIMENSION
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / SERRANO SUMMIT / CIVIC CENTER / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "c" CURVES (at Civic Ctr)
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Commercentre 2024-26
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.64 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
50 X X 2 1.3% 98.7%
X X X X 4 2.5% 97.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 94.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 84.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 75.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5% 65.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 56.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 48.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 56.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 48.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 39.9%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.6% 33.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 25.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.1% 20.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 15.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 10.8%
35 X X X X 4 2.5% 6.3%
X X X X 4 2.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 158
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.2 %
File: Commercentre 2024-26
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
COMMERCENTRE DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.4%
50 X 98.7%
49 X 97.5%
48 X 94.9%
47 X 90.5% }PACE
46 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 75.3% }PACE
44 X 65.8% }PACE
43 X 56.3% }PACE
HCI
44 X 65.8% }PACE
43 X 56.3% }PACE
42 X 48.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 39.9% }PACE
40 X 33.5% }PACE
39 X 25.9% }PACE
38 X 20.3% }PACE
37 X 15.2%
36 X 10.8% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 6.3%
34 X 3.8%
33 X 1.3%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.2 %
Commercentre 2024-26
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE MONARCH BL-CATALINA TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:15 AM - 1:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF BAKE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.63
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.27
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
4,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE /MONARCH-CATALINA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT DOWNHILL GRADE (SB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ROUND-ABOUT AT MONARCH-CATALINA
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Dimension 2024-27
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.18 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE MONARCH BL-CATALINA TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:15 AM - 1:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 98.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 98.4%
X X 2 1.6% 97.7%
40 X X X 3 2.3% 96.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 93.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 89.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 84.5%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 79.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.6% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.6% 63.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 51.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.3% 39.5%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 30.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 20.2%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 15.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 11.6%
X X X 3 2.3% 5.4%
25 X X X X 4 3.1% 3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
File: Dimension 2024-27
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE MONARCH BL-CATALINA TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:15 AM - 1:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.2%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.2%
42 X 98.4%
41 X 97.7%
40 X 96.1%
39 X 93.8% }PACE
38 X 89.1% }PACE
37 X 84.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
36 X 79.1% }PACE
35 X 75.2% }PACE
34 X 63.6% }PACE
33 X 51.9% }PACE
32 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 39.5% }PACE
30 X 30.2% }PACE
29 X 20.2%
28 X 15.5%
27 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
26 X 5.4%
25 X 3.1%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.2 %
Dimension 2024-27
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ENTERPRISE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.72
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
9,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / COMMERCENTER-ENTERPRIZE / CANADA / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / COMMERCENTER-ENTERPRIZE / CANADA / LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (Heavy parking btwn Canada to Lake Forest)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
NO RV PARKING
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
BUS STOPS
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Dimension 2024-28
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.73 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
0 0.0% 98.6%
X 1 0.7% 98.6%
0 0.0% 97.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 97.9%
50 X X X X X 5 3.4% 95.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 90.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 84.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 76.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.6% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 60.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 44.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 44.5%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 37.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 34.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 26.7%
X X X X 4 2.7% 21.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 18.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 12.3%
35 X X X 3 2.1% 7.5%
X X X 3 2.1% 5.5%
X X 2 1.4% 3.4%
X X X 3 2.1% 2.1%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 146
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
File: Dimension 2024-28
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
DIMENSION DRIVE BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 98.6%
53 X 98.6%
52 X 97.9%
51 X 97.9%
50 X 95.9%
49 X 92.5%
48 X 90.4% }PACE
47 X 84.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 76.7% }PACE
45 X 71.9% }PACE
44 X 60.3% }PACE
43 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
44 X 60.3% }PACE
43 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 44.5% }PACE
41 X 37.7% }PACE
40 X 34.2% }PACE
39 X 26.7% }PACE
38 X 21.2%
37 X 18.5%
36 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 7.5%
34 X 5.5%
33 X 3.4%
32 X 2.1%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.2 %
Dimension 2024-28
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SWARTZ
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 61.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 16 3.20 0.80
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 51 10.20 2.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 4 LANES PER DIRECTION
50,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 4 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BRIDGER / ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS AT BRIDGER (faded) / ROCKFIELD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER NO SHOULDERS
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / MANY
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / SHOPPING CENTERS (dense) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-29
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.22 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.2% 99.6%
X X X 3 1.2% 98.4%
X X X X X 5 2.0% 97.2%
45 X X X X X X X 7 2.8% 95.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.2% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.4% 89.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 84.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 79.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.3% 73.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6.7% 66.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.3% 59.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 53.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.6% 47.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.6% 47.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6.7% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.0% 35.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.6% 29.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.8% 23.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.8% 19.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.4% 14.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.6% 9.9%
X X X X X X 6 2.4% 6.3%
X X X X 4 1.6% 4.0%
X X X 3 1.2% 2.4%
25 X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 252
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.8 %
File: El Toro 2024-29
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:30 AM - 9:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.6%
47 X 98.4%
46 X 97.2%
45 X 95.2%
44 X 92.5%
43 X 89.3%
42 X 84.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
41 X 79.0% }PACE
40 X 73.0% }PACE
39 X 66.7% }PACE
38 X 59.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 59.9% }PACE
37 X 53.6% }PACE
36 X 47.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 42.1% }PACE
34 X 35.3% }PACE
33 X 29.4% }PACE
32 X 23.8%
31 X 19.0%
30 X 14.3% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 9.9%
28 X 6.3%
27 X 4.0%
26 X 2.4%
25 X 1.2%
24 X 0.4%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.8 %
El Toro 2024-29
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/14/24 & 3/19/24 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15-2:50 PM & 12:10-1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MUIRLANDS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 13 2.60 0.29
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.09
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 6 1.20 0.13
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 3 0.60 0.07
TOTAL COLLISIONS 90 18.00 1.98
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 4 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / ARBORWAX / RAYMOND / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / ARBORWAX / RAYMOND / MUIRLANDS 41,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / ARBORWAX / RAYMOND / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER NO SHOULDERS
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF-few) / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-30
The segment of El Toro Road is an eight-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, commercial and residential (non-fronting).
The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 47.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 13 speed-related collisions, four (4) involved a serious injury, six (6) involved a pedestrian and three (3) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.60 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.6%
X X X X X 5 2.2% 98.7%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 3.5% 96.5%
X X X X X X X 7 3.1% 93.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.8% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.6% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.6% 78.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.9% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.9% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.5% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.5% 48.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.7% 41.2%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.3% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.1% 30.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.8% 24.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.4% 19.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.9% 14.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.9% 14.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 3.9% 11.0%
X X X X X X 6 2.6% 7.0%
X X X X X 5 2.2% 4.4%
X X 2 0.9% 2.2%
X X 2 0.9% 1.3%
30 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 228
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.1 %
File: El Toro 2024-30
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.6%
51 X 98.7%
50 X 96.5%
49 X 93.0%
48 X 89.9% }PACE
47 X 85.1% }PACE
46 X 78.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 71.9% }PACE
44 X 64.0% }PACE
43 X 56.1% }PACE
42 X 48.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 41.2% }PACE
40 X 35.5% }PACE
39 X 30.3% }PACE
38 X 24.1%
HCI
38 X 24.1%
37 X 19.3%
36 X 14.9% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 11.0%
34 X 7.0%
33 X 4.4%
32 X 2.2%
31 X 1.3%
30 X 0.4%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.1 %
El Toro 2024-30
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MUIRLANDS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 53.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 61.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 3 0.60 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 55 11.00 1.44
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / FIRE STATION / JERONIMO 40,300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / FIRE STATION / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS / JERONIMO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RES (NF) /BUSINESS / CHURCH-SCHOOL / FIRE STATION / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-31
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business, church, fire station and residential (non- fronting). A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had seven (7) speed-related collisions and three (3) involved a bicyclist. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.3 mph and 10 mph pace range of 45 to 54 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limits of the adjoining segment, it is recommended to reduce the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.52 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
X 1 0.3% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.7%
X X 2 0.7% 99.7%
X 1 0.3% 99.0%
60 X X 2 0.7% 98.7%
X 1 0.3% 98.0%
X X X X 4 1.3% 97.6%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.7% 94.6%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.7% 91.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 88.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.1% 83.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 7.4% 76.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.4% 69.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.7% 63.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.1% 57.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.1% 50.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.4% 44.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.4% 38.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.4% 32.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 26.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.7% 22.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 17.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.7% 22.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.4% 17.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.4% 13.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 10.1%
X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 7.1%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 4.7%
X X X X 4 1.3% 3.0%
X X X 3 1.0% 1.7%
35 X 1 0.3% 0.7%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 297
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-31
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 11:05 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 99.7%
62 X 99.7%
61 X 99.0%
60 X 98.7%
59 X 98.0%
58 X 97.6%
57 X 96.3%
56 X 94.6%
55 X 91.9%
54 X 88.2% }PACE
53 X 83.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
52 X 76.8% }PACE
51 X 69.4% }PACE
50 X 63.0% }PACE
49 X 57.2% }PACE
48 X 50.2% }PACE
47 X 44.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 38.7% }PACE
45 X 32.3% }PACE
44 X 26.9%
43 X 22.6%
HCI
44 X 26.9%
43 X 22.6%
42 X 17.8%
41 X 13.5% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.1%
39 X 7.1%
38 X 4.7%
37 X 3.0%
36 X 1.7%
35 X 0.7%
34 X 0.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.9 %
El Toro 2024-31
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PINO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 47 - 56 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.21
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.07
TOTAL COLLISIONS 30 6.00 1.06
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TOLEDO
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / TOLEDO
39,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / TOLEDO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-32
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a serious injury and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.39 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 0.8% 100.0%
60 X X X X 4 1.5% 99.2%
X X X X 4 1.5% 97.7%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 96.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.4% 94.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.3% 90.8%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 8.4% 85.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.6% 77.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 8.0% 69.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.6% 61.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 8.4% 53.8% 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 8.0% 45.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.3% 37.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.3% 30.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.0% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.3% 17.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.8% 12.6%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 8.8%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.5%
X X X 3 1.1% 4.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.5%
X X X 3 1.1% 4.6%
X X X X 4 1.5% 3.4%
40 X X X 3 1.1% 1.9%
X 1 0.4% 0.8%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 262
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-32
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 99.2%
59 X 97.7%
58 X 96.2%
57 X 94.3%
56 X 90.8% }PACE
55 X 85.5% }PACE
54 X 77.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 69.5% }PACE
52 X 61.5% }PACE
51 X 53.8% }PACE
50 X 45.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
49 X 37.4% }PACE
48 X 30.2% }PACE
47 X 22.9% }PACE
46 X 17.9%
45 X 12.6% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 8.8%
43 X 6.5%
HCI
44 X 8.8%
43 X 6.5%
42 X 4.6%
41 X 3.4%
40 X 1.9%
39 X 0.8%
38 X 0.4%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.9 %
El Toro 2024-32
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TRABUCO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 63.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.34
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.03
TOTAL COLLISIONS 34 6.80 1.16
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANO / TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO / TRABUCO
38,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO / TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-33
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed-related collisions, three (3) involved a serious injury and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.42 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X 1 0.3% 99.7%
X X 2 0.7% 99.3%
60 X X X 3 1.0% 98.7%
X X X 3 1.0% 97.7%
X X X X X X X 7 2.3% 96.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.6% 94.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.2% 90.8%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.6% 79.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 6.9% 74.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.2% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.6% 61.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 7.9% 54.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 46.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 7.5% 40.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 33.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.6% 27.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.9% 21.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.3% 15.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3.9% 11.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 7.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3.9% 11.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 7.5%
X X X X X X 6 2.0% 4.6%
40 X X X X X 5 1.6% 2.6%
X X 2 0.7% 1.0%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 305
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.6 %
File: El Toro 2024-33
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:55 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 99.7%
61 X 99.3%
60 X 98.7%
59 X 97.7%
58 X 96.7%
57 X 94.4%
56 X 90.8%
55 X 85.6% }PACE
54 X 79.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 74.1% }PACE
52 X 67.2% }PACE
51 X 61.0% }PACE
50 X 54.4% }PACE
49 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
48 X 40.7% }PACE
47 X 33.1% }PACE
46 X 27.2% }PACE
45 X 21.6%
44 X 15.7%
43 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
44 X 15.7%
43 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 7.5%
41 X 4.6%
40 X 2.6%
39 X 1.0%
38 X 0.3%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.6 %
El Toro 2024-33
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TRABUCO RD TO ALISO PARK DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MONTCLIFF
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 27 5.40 1.29
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES (WB) - 3 LANES (EB)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO / ALISO PARK
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / ALISO PARK
31,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / ALISO PARK
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - NO / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / ALISO CREEK PED TRAIL (EB) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-34
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station.
The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.1 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TRABUCO RD TO ALISO PARK DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
60 X X 2 0.7% 99.3%
X X X X 4 1.4% 98.6%
X X X 3 1.1% 97.1%
X X X X X X X 7 2.5% 96.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.9% 93.5%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.0% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.7% 84.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.5% 78.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.2% 72.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 7.9% 65.2% 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.2% 57.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.2% 50.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.5% 43.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.5% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.8% 29.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.4% 22.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.6% 16.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 13.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 10.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 13.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.9% 10.4%
X X X X X X X 7 2.5% 7.5%
40 X X X X X 5 1.8% 5.0%
X X X X X X 6 2.2% 3.2%
X X 2 0.7% 1.1%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 279
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
File: El Toro 2024-34
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD TRABUCO RD TO ALISO PARK DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 99.6%
60 X 99.3%
59 X 98.6%
58 X 97.1%
57 X 96.1%
56 X 93.5%
55 X 89.6%
54 X 84.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 78.9% }PACE
52 X 72.4% }PACE
51 X 65.2% }PACE
50 X 57.3% }PACE
49 X 50.2% }PACE
48 X 43.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 35.5% }PACE
46 X 29.0% }PACE
45 X 22.2% }PACE
44 X 16.8%
43 X 13.3% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
44 X 16.8%
43 X 13.3% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 10.4%
41 X 7.5%
40 X 5.0%
39 X 3.2%
38 X 1.1%
37 X 0.4%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
El Toro 2024-34
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ALISO PARK DR TO NORTHCREST DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ALISO PARK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 58.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 49 - 58 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 57.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.13
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.45
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (EB) - 3 LANES (WB)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALISO PARK / NORTHCREST
CROSSWALKS AT ALISO PARK / NORTHCREST (sch)
26,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ALISO PARK / NORTHCREST (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - NO / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-35
This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land use is residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions and three (3) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.47 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ALISO PARK DR TO NORTHCREST DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.2% 99.7%
X X X X X X 6 1.8% 98.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 2.7% 96.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.4% 93.9%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.0% 90.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.3% 86.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 4.9% 82.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.5% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 7.0% 72.0% 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.1% 64.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 6.7% 58.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.2% 52.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 6.7% 47.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.1% 40.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.2% 34.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.6% 29.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.3% 24.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.6% 20.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.3% 15.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.4% 11.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.0% 7.9%
X X X X X X 6 1.8% 4.9%
X X X 3 0.9% 3.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 1.8% 4.9%
X X X 3 0.9% 3.0%
X X X 3 0.9% 2.1%
40 X X 2 0.6% 1.2%
X 1 0.3% 0.6%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 328
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 57.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.4 %
File: El Toro 2024-35
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD ALISO PARK DR TO NORTHCREST DR
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.7%
63 X 98.5%
62 X 96.6%
61 X 93.9%
60 X 90.5%
59 X 86.6%
58 X 82.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
57 X 77.4% }PACE
56 X 72.0% }PACE
55 X 64.9% }PACE
54 X 58.8% }PACE
53 X 52.1% }PACE
52 X 47.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 40.2% }PACE
50 X 34.1% }PACE
49 X 29.0% }PACE
48 X 24.4%
47 X 20.1%
46 X 15.5%
45 X 11.3% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 7.9%
43 X 4.9%
HCI
44 X 7.9%
43 X 4.9%
42 X 3.0%
41 X 2.1%
40 X 1.2%
39 X 0.6%
38 X 0.3%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 58 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 57.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 24.4 %
El Toro 2024-35
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORTHCREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF DESTRY
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 58.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 50 - 59 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.02
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 22 4.40 0.49
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2-3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORTHCREST / NORMANDALE
CROSSWALKS AT NORTHCREST (sch) / NORMANDALE
25,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT NORTHCREST (sch) / NORMANDALE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - YES / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / COMMERCIAL ( at S.Margarita)
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (WB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS (at Northcrest) / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-36
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are business and residential (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 58.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had eight (8) speed-related collisions and one (1) fatality collision, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.99 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORTHCREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 1.3% 99.7%
X X X X X X 6 2.0% 98.3%
X X X X X X X 7 2.3% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.0% 94.0%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.0% 91.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.3% 87.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.3% 81.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 7.6% 75.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 7.9% 67.9% 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.6% 59.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 7.3% 53.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.0% 46.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.0% 40.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.3% 34.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 7.0% 28.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.0% 21.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.0% 16.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.6% 11.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.6% 8.3%
45 X X X X X X X 7 2.3% 5.6%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 3.3%
X X X 3 1.0% 1.7%
X X 2 0.7% 0.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 1.0% 1.7%
X X 2 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 302
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-36
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORTHCREST DR TO NORMANDALE DR
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.7%
63 X 98.3%
62 X 96.4%
61 X 94.0%
60 X 91.1%
59 X 87.1% }PACE
58 X 81.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
57 X 75.5% }PACE
56 X 67.9% }PACE
55 X 59.9% }PACE
54 X 53.3% }PACE
53 X 46.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
52 X 40.1% }PACE
51 X 34.1% }PACE
50 X 28.8% }PACE
49 X 21.9%
48 X 16.9%
47 X 11.9% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 8.3%
45 X 5.6%
44 X 3.3%
43 X 1.7%
HCI
44 X 3.3%
43 X 1.7%
42 X 0.7%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 58.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.9 %
El Toro 2024-36
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF NORMANDALE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 59.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 50 - 59 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 58.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.12
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.40
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORMANDALE / SANTA MARGARITA
24,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - NORMANDALE / SANTA MARGARITA
CROSSWALKS AT NORMANDALE / SANTA MARGARITA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - NO / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (EB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-37
This segment of El Toro Road is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.9 mph and 10 mph pace range of 50 to 59 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had three (3) speed-related collisions and one (1) collision involved a pedestrian. To maintain consistency with speed limits of 50 mph on adjacent segments, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
X X 2 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 0.6% 99.4%
0 0.0% 98.9%
X X X 3 0.8% 98.9%
65 X X X X X 5 1.4% 98.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 2.2% 96.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 2.8% 94.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 2.8% 91.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3.4% 88.8%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.2% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 5.0% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 5.6% 76.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 5.6% 70.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 7.0% 65.1% 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 6.1% 58.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 5.9% 52.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 6.7% 46.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 5.9% 39.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 5.3% 33.5%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 5.3% 28.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 4.7% 22.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4.2% 18.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 3.9% 14.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3.1% 10.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 2.5% 7.0%
X X X X X X X 7 2.0% 4.5%
X X X X X X 6 1.7% 2.5%
X X X 3 0.8% 0.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 1.7% 2.5%
X X X 3 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 358
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 58.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-37
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD NORMANDALE DR TO PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 99.4%
67 X 98.9%
66 X 98.9%
65 X 98.0%
64 X 96.6%
63 X 94.4%
62 X 91.6%
61 X 88.8%
60 X 85.5%
59 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
58 X 76.3% }PACE
57 X 70.7% }PACE
56 X 65.1% }PACE
55 X 58.1% }PACE
54 X 52.0% }PACE
53 X 46.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
52 X 39.4% }PACE
51 X 33.5% }PACE
50 X 28.2% }PACE
49 X 22.9%
48 X 18.2%
47 X 14.0% - - - - - -15PCT
46 X 10.1%
45 X 7.0%
44 X 4.5%
43 X 2.5%
HCI
44 X 4.5%
43 X 2.5%
42 X 0.8%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 53.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 58.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.9 %
El Toro 2024-37
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA TO MARGUERITE PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF PHEASANT ROW
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 57.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 50 - 59 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 61.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.51
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (WB) - 2-3 LANES (EB - Lane drops at Pheasant Run)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SANTA MARGARITA / PHEASANT RUN / MARGUERITE
CROSSWALKS AT SANTA MARGARITA / PHEASANT ROW / MARGUERITE 10,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT SANTA MARGARITA / PHEASANT ROW / MARGUERITE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) - NO / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / 2 WAY LEFT
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (EB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CHURCH / ALISO CREEK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-38
This segment of El Toro Road has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a bike trail. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 57.4 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.61 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA TO MARGUERITE PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
X X 2 0.8% 99.2%
X X 2 0.8% 98.5%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 97.7%
60 X X X X X X X X 8 3.0% 95.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.5% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.3% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.8% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5.7% 76.2%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.8% 70.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.2% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 7.5% 56.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6.8% 49.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6.4% 42.3%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.9% 35.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.2% 30.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.5% 26.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.2% 22.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.4% 18.1%
45 X X X X X X X 7 2.6% 14.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.0% 12.1%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 9.1%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.8%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 9.1%
X X X X X 5 1.9% 6.8%
X X X 3 1.1% 4.9%
40 X X X X 4 1.5% 3.8%
X X X 3 1.1% 2.3%
X X 2 0.8% 1.1%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 265
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 57.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 30.9 %
File: El Toro 2024-38
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD PORTOLA / SANTA MARGARITA TO MARGUERITE PKWY DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 99.6%
63 X 99.2%
62 X 98.5%
61 X 97.7%
60 X 95.8%
59 X 92.8% }PACE
58 X 88.3% }PACE
57 X 83.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
56 X 76.2% }PACE
55 X 70.6% }PACE
54 X 63.8% }PACE
53 X 56.6% }PACE
52 X 49.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
51 X 42.3% }PACE
50 X 35.8% }PACE
49 X 30.9%
48 X 26.8%
47 X 22.3%
46 X 18.1%
45 X 14.7% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 12.1%
43 X 9.1%
HCI
44 X 12.1%
43 X 9.1%
42 X 6.8%
41 X 4.9%
40 X 3.8%
39 X 2.3%
38 X 1.1%
37 X 0.4%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 59 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 57.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 52.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 61.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 30.9 %
El Toro 2024-38
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CIELO ENTRADA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 55.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 63.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.07
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.13
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GLENN RANCH / VALLEY VISTA / RIDGELINE
CROSSWALKS AT GLENN RANCH / VALLEY VISTA / RIDGELINE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
9,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT GLENN RANCH / VALLEY VISTA / RIDGELINE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER BUS STOPS
NO SHOULDERS (areas of) / BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ALISO CREEK BIKE WAY (WB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / OPEN UNDEVELOPED LAND RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: El Toro 2024-39
This segment of El Toro Road is a two-lane rural roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), a bike trail and open land. Field notes state that the roadway has a slight to gradual horizontal and vertical curves, areas of no shoulders, no stopping any time and bike lanes. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 55.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.
0.87 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
X X X 3 1.2% 99.2%
60 X X X X 4 1.6% 98.0%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 96.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.1% 94.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.9% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.9% 87.1%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.5% 83.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.1% 77.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.5% 72.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.0% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.4% 60.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.0% 52.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.0% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.4% 38.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.3% 31.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5.5% 25.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.1% 19.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.3% 14.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.5% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 6.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.5% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.3% 6.6%
X X X X X 5 2.0% 4.3%
40 X X X 3 1.2% 2.3%
X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 256
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.5 %
File: El Toro 2024-39
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
EL TORO ROAD GLENN RANCH RD TO RIDGELINE RD
DATE: 3/29/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 99.6%
61 X 99.2%
60 X 98.0%
59 X 96.5%
58 X 94.1%
57 X 91.0%
56 X 87.1%
55 X 83.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
54 X 77.7% }PACE
53 X 72.7% }PACE
52 X 67.2% }PACE
51 X 60.2% }PACE
50 X 52.7% }PACE
49 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
48 X 38.7% }PACE
47 X 31.3% }PACE
46 X 25.0% }PACE
45 X 19.5%
44 X 14.5% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 10.2%
HCI
44 X 14.5% - - - - - -15PCT
43 X 10.2%
42 X 6.6%
41 X 4.3%
40 X 2.3%
39 X 1.2%
38 X 0.4%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 55.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 49.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 63.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.5 %
El Toro 2024-39
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD PORTOLA PKWY TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COOK
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 59.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 51 - 60 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 55 MPH (EB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.07
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.07
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.40
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA / ELLIPSE / DEFINITION / SADDLEBACK RANCH
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / ELLIPSE / DEFINITION / SADDLEBACK RANCH 16,400
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA / ELLIPSE / DEFINITION / SADDLEBACK RANCH
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
PAINTED BIKE LANES / BIKES MAY USE FULL LANE
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN / 2 WAY LEFT TURN / SOLID DBL YELLOW / PAINTED ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS /RES (NF) / PARK / WILDERNESS PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Glenn Ranch 2024-40
This segment of Glenn Ranch Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, park and open space. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 59.0 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 55 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions and two (2) involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 55 mph speed limit be reduced to 50 mph.
0.92 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD PORTOLA PKWY TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 100.0%
65 X X 2 1.0% 99.0%
X X 2 1.0% 98.1%
X X X 3 1.4% 97.1%
X X X X 4 1.9% 95.7%
X X X X X X 6 2.9% 93.8%
60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.2% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.7% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.2% 78.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.6% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.0% 64.3%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.5% 55.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.6% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.1% 37.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.2% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.7% 23.8%
50 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.3% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.3% 12.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 8.6%
X X X 3 1.4% 5.2%
X X X X 4 1.9% 3.8%
45 X X 2 1.0% 1.9%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
40 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 210
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 60 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 54.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
File: Glenn Ranch 2024-40
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD PORTOLA PKWY TO SADDLEBACK RANCH RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:50 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 99.0%
64 X 98.1%
63 X 97.1%
62 X 95.7%
61 X 93.8%
60 X 91.0% }PACE
59 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
58 X 78.1% }PACE
57 X 71.9% }PACE
56 X 64.3% }PACE
55 X 55.2% }PACE
54 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
53 X 37.1% }PACE
52 X 30.0% }PACE
51 X 23.8% }PACE
50 X 17.1%
49 X 12.9% - - - - - -15PCT
48 X 8.6%
47 X 5.2%
46 X 3.8%
45 X 1.9%
44 X 1.0%
43 X 0.5%
HCI
44 X 1.0%
43 X 0.5%
42 X 0.0%
41 X 0.0%
40 X 0.0%
39 X 0.0%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 60 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 59.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 54.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
Glenn Ranch 2024-40
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SADDLEBACK RANCH
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.34
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
7,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SADDLEBACK RANCH / VIEJO RIDGE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT SADDLEBACK RANCH / VIEJO RIDGE / EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES (EB) - YES / NO (WB)
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
PAINTED BIKE LANES / HORSE TRAIL (north side)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PARTIAL ISLAND
DEER CROSSING NEXT MILE SIGN
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / PARK (at Saddleback Ranch) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Glenn Ranch 2024-41
The recommended 50 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.69 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.2% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.2%
X X X X 4 2.4% 97.6%
55 X X X X 4 2.4% 95.2%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 92.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.5% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.7% 75.6%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 64.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 57.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.9% 49.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 40.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 32.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 26.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 20.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 15.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 8.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 15.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 8.9%
X X X X 4 2.4% 4.8%
40 X X X 3 1.8% 2.4%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 168
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
File: Glenn Ranch 2024-41
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GLENN RANCH ROAD SADDLEBACK RANCH RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.4%
57 X 98.2%
56 X 97.6%
55 X 95.2%
54 X 92.9%
53 X 89.9%
52 X 85.1% }PACE
51 X 75.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
50 X 64.9% }PACE
49 X 57.1% }PACE
48 X 49.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 40.5% }PACE
46 X 32.7% }PACE
45 X 26.8% }PACE
44 X 20.2% }PACE
43 X 15.5% }PACE
HCI
44 X 20.2% }PACE
43 X 15.5% }PACE
42 X 8.9% - - - - - -15PCT
41 X 4.8%
40 X 2.4%
39 X 0.6%
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
Glenn Ranch 2024-41
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GOWDY AVENUE CAVANAUGH RD TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15 PM - 4:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF DURYEA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
20 MPH (Advisory at bend)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
6/13/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (except by permit)
NO PARKING TUES STREET SWEEPING / NO STOPPING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE & BEND (at Golden Eagle-north end of segment) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (partial)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / CAVANAUGH PARK (length of segment) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING, F = FRONTING File: Gowdy 2024-42
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.51 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GOWDY AVENUE CAVANAUGH RD TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15 PM - 4:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.1%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
35 X X X 3 2.6% 98.3%
X X X 3 2.6% 95.7%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.9% 87.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.9% 80.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.1% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 44.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 32.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 25.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 19.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 11.2%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 6.0%
X 1 0.9% 1.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 116
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
File: Gowdy 2024-42
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
GOWDY AVENUE CAVANAUGH RD TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 6/13/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:15 PM - 4:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 99.1%
36 X 99.1%
35 X 98.3%
34 X 95.7%
33 X 93.1% }PACE
32 X 87.1% }PACE
31 X 80.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
30 X 67.2% }PACE
29 X 55.2% }PACE
28 X 44.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 32.8% }PACE
26 X 25.0% }PACE
25 X 19.0% }PACE
24 X 11.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 6.0%
22 X 1.7%
21 X 0.9%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.0 %
File:Gowdy 2024-42
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO LANE BAKE LANE TO CAYUGA LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF HURON
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 18 - 27 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH Advisory (at Bake Lane)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - JERONIMO LN ENT (N), YIELD - JERONIMO LN ENT (S)
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL / YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (at norh end)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at intersection approaches) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Jeronimo Ln 2024-43 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO LANE BAKE LANE TO CAYUGA LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
X X X X 4 3.8% 98.1%
X X 2 1.9% 94.3%
30 X X X 3 2.8% 92.5%
X X X X 4 3.8% 89.6%
X X X X 4 3.8% 85.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 74.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.4% 67.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.3% 56.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.4% 44.3%
X X X X X X X 7 6.6% 34.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 27.4%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.7% 19.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.7% 14.2%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 8.5%
X X X 3 2.8% 3.8%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 106
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 18 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
File: Jeronimo Ln 2024-43
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO LANE BAKE LANE TO CAYUGA LANE
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 99.1%
32 X 98.1%
31 X 94.3%
30 X 92.5%
29 X 89.6%
28 X 85.8%
27 X 82.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
26 X 74.5% }PACE
25 X 67.0% }PACE
24 X 56.6% }PACE
23 X 44.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 34.0% }PACE
21 X 27.4% }PACE
20 X 19.8% }PACE
19 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
18 X 8.5% }PACE
17 X 3.8%
16 X 0.9%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 18 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
Jeronimo Ln 2024-43
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF JERONIMO LN
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
12,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BAKE / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT BAKE / LAKE FOREST (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / N0
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Jeronimo 2024-44
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.56 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
55 X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 97.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 96.2%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 93.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 90.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4% 83.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4% 78.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.5% 72.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 65.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.2% 55.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.6% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.3% 37.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 25.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 18.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 14.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 9.1%
X X X 3 1.6% 5.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 4.3%
X 1 0.5% 2.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 2.7%
35 X X X X 4 2.2% 2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 186
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.0 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-44
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD BAKE PKWY TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.5%
54 X 98.9%
53 X 97.8%
52 X 96.2%
51 X 93.0%
50 X 90.3% }PACE
49 X 83.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 78.0% }PACE
47 X 72.6% }PACE
46 X 65.1% }PACE
45 X 55.9% }PACE
44 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 37.1% }PACE
42 X 25.8% }PACE
41 X 18.8% }PACE
40 X 14.0% - - - - - -15PCT
39 X 9.1%
38 X 5.9%
HCI
38 X 5.9%
37 X 4.3%
36 X 2.7%
35 X 2.2%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.0 %
Jeronimo 2024-44
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SHADOW FAX
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / *25 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.07
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.47
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / SCHOOL / RIDGE ROUTE CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / SCHOOL (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch) 13,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST (sch) / SCHOOL (sch) / RIDGE ROUTE (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF PASSENGER LOADING ZONES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SCHOOL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING, *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Jeronimo 2024-45 This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and an intermediate school.
Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.6 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.63 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 99.4%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 98.3%
50 X X X X 4 2.2% 95.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 90.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 87.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.7% 81.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 73.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.8% 65.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.5% 56.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 45.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.0% 37.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.4% 26.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 11.0%
X X X X 4 2.2% 6.6%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 4.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 2.8% 4.4%
35 X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 181
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.6 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-45
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.4%
51 X 98.3%
50 X 95.6%
49 X 93.4%
48 X 90.6%
47 X 87.3% }PACE
46 X 81.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 73.5% }PACE
44 X 65.2% }PACE
43 X 56.4% }PACE
42 X 45.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 37.6% }PACE
40 X 26.5% }PACE
39 X 17.1% }PACE
38 X 11.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 11.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
37 X 6.6%
36 X 4.4%
35 X 1.7%
34 X 0.6%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.6 %
Jeronimo 2024-45
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MILES
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.83
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
13,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Jeronimo 2024-46
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a high school. Field notes state that the roadway has constant moderate horizontal curves and areas of limited sight distance. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 46.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collision and one (1) involved a fatality, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.50 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.1% 98.9%
50 X X 2 1.1% 96.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 95.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 88.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 81.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.1% 74.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.0% 64.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 47.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.5% 39.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 31.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 23.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.8% 17.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 11.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 7.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 7.4%
35 X X X X X 5 2.6% 3.7%
X X 2 1.1% 1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 189
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-46
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 98.9%
50 X 96.8%
49 X 95.8%
48 X 93.1%
47 X 88.9% }PACE
46 X 81.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 74.1% }PACE
44 X 64.0% }PACE
43 X 55.0% }PACE
42 X 47.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 39.7% }PACE
40 X 31.2% }PACE
39 X 23.8% }PACE
38 X 17.5% }PACE
HCI
38 X 17.5% }PACE
37 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 7.4%
35 X 3.7%
34 X 1.1%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
Jeronimo 2024-46
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD EL TORO RD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LAURELWOOD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 45.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 5 1.00 0.26
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.10
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 1.05
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO / CHERRY / LOS ALISOS
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / CHERRY / LOS ALISOS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
21,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO / CHERRY / LOS ALISOS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
2 HR PARKING
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / RAISED MEIDAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / PARK / DRIVING RANGE RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Jeronimo 2024-47
This segment of Jeronimo Road is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, park and a driving range. Field notes state that the roadway has slight horizontal and vertical curves, bike lanes and no stopping any time. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 45.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had five (5) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD EL TORO RD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.6% 99.0%
50 X X X X 4 2.1% 97.4%
X X X X 4 2.1% 95.3%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 93.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 90.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 86.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.4% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.3% 70.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.3% 62.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 55.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 47.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.4% 39.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.3% 30.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 16.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 9.9%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X 5 2.6% 9.9%
35 X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 7.3%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 3.7%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 191
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.9 %
File: Jeronimo 2024-47
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
JERONIMO ROAD EL TORO RD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:35 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.5%
51 X 99.0%
50 X 97.4%
49 X 95.3%
48 X 93.2%
47 X 90.6%
46 X 86.4% }PACE
45 X 79.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
44 X 70.2% }PACE
43 X 62.8% }PACE
42 X 55.5% }PACE
41 X 47.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 39.8% }PACE
39 X 30.4% }PACE
38 X 23.0% }PACE
HCI
38 X 23.0% }PACE
37 X 16.8% }PACE
36 X 9.9% - - - - - -15PCT
35 X 7.3%
34 X 3.7%
33 X 1.0%
32 X 0.5%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.9 %
Jeronimo 2024-47
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE CENTER DR - MERCURY RD LAKE FOREST DR TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MERCURY
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
15 MPH (Advisory at Bend)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTALCOLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.96
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,000
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER ENTER FROM LAKE FOREST DR ONLY / NO EXIT (NB)
NO STRIPING AFTER SLURRY SEAL
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE ROADWAY / SHORT SEGMENT
THIS SEGMENTS COMBINES LAKE CENTER DR & MERCURY RD AS ONE SURVEY
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Lake Center -Mercury 2024-48
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.19 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE CENTER DR - MERCURY RD LAKE FOREST DR TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
35 X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
35 X X X X 4 3.1% 97.7%
X X X 3 2.3% 94.7%
X X X 3 2.3% 92.4%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 90.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 84.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.9% 80.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 70.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.1% 64.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.7% 58.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.4% 45.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.4% 36.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 28.2%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 22.9%
X X X 3 2.3% 19.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.6% 16.8%
20 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 12.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 6.9%
X X 2 1.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.5% 2.3%
0 0.0% 0.8%
15 X 1 0.8% 0.8%
TOTAL VEHICLES 131
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.1 %
File: Lake Center -Mercury 2024-48
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE CENTER DR - MERCURY RD LAKE FOREST DR TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 98.5%
35 X 97.7%
34 X 94.7%
33 X 92.4%
32 X 90.1% }PACE
31 X 84.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
30 X 80.2% }PACE
29 X 70.2% }PACE
28 X 64.9% }PACE
27 X 58.8% }PACE
26 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 36.6% }PACE
24 X 28.2% }PACE
23 X 22.9% }PACE
22 X 19.1%
21 X 16.8%
20 X 12.2% - - - - - -15PCT
19 X 6.9%
18 X 3.8%
17 X 2.3%
16 X 0.8%
15 X 0.8%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.1 %
Lake Center -Mercury 2024-48
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ROCKFIELD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 40.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATEDCOLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 27 5.40 1.36
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
54,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - INTERSTATE 5 / ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-49
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 0.5 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.20 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
45 X X X 3 1.8% 99.4%
X X X 3 1.8% 97.6%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 95.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.8% 88.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 80.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.4% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.0% 65.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.2% 59.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.4% 49.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.4% 49.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 41.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 34.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.6% 28.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 21.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 16.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 12.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 7.8%
X X X X 4 2.4% 4.2%
X X 2 1.2% 1.8%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 167
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-49
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.4%
44 X 97.6%
43 X 95.8%
42 X 92.8%
41 X 88.6% }PACE
40 X 80.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
39 X 74.3% }PACE
38 X 65.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 65.9% }PACE
37 X 59.9% }PACE
36 X 49.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 41.3% }PACE
34 X 34.7% }PACE
33 X 28.1% }PACE
32 X 21.6% }PACE
31 X 16.8%
30 X 12.0% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.8%
28 X 4.2%
27 X 1.8%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-49
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATEDCOLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.11
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.06
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.03
TOTAL COLLISIONS 38 7.60 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
36,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / ASPEN / TOWNE CTR / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD / ASPEN / TOWNE CTR / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL (RETAIL) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-50
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
50 X X 2 1.2% 98.8%
X X X X X 5 3.0% 97.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 94.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.1% 89.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.3% 80.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.7% 69.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.5% 60.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.9% 51.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.3% 43.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 36.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.3% 29.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 22.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 15.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.2% 11.5%
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 7.3%
35 X X X X 4 2.4% 3.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 3.6% 7.3%
35 X X X X 4 2.4% 3.6%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 165
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-50
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:35 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.4%
50 X 98.8%
49 X 97.6%
48 X 94.5% }PACE
47 X 89.1% }PACE
46 X 80.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 69.7% }PACE
44 X 60.0% }PACE
43 X 51.5% }PACE
42 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 36.4% }PACE
40 X 29.7% }PACE
39 X 22.4% }PACE
38 X 15.8%
HCI
38 X 15.8%
37 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 7.3%
35 X 3.6%
34 X 1.2%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-50
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 47 - 56 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 10 2.00 0.49
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 33 6.60 1.60
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / JERONIMO / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO / MUIRLANDS
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
32,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / MOBILE HOME PARK (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-51
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and mobile home park (non-fronting). The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 54.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had ten (10) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.35 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X X X 4 2.0% 98.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.6% 92.3%
55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.1% 85.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.6% 78.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.1% 71.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 65.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.7% 58.2%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 49.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 41.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 34.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 26.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 20.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 14.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 10.2%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 7.7%
X X 2 1.0% 4.6%
X X X 3 1.5% 3.6%
40 X X 2 1.0% 2.0%
X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 196
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.4 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-51
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 98.5%
57 X 96.4%
56 X 92.3% }PACE
55 X 85.7% }PACE
54 X 78.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
53 X 71.9% }PACE
52 X 65.8% }PACE
51 X 58.2% }PACE
50 X 49.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
49 X 41.8% }PACE
48 X 34.2% }PACE
47 X 26.0% }PACE
46 X 20.4%
45 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
44 X 10.2%
43 X 7.7%
42 X 4.6%
41 X 3.6%
40 X 2.0%
39 X 1.0%
38 X 0.5%
HCI
38 X 0.5%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 56 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 54.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 50.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.4 %
Lake Forest 2024-51
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TOLEDO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 53.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 44 - 53 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.09
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 23 4.60 1.09
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO
33,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / JERONIMO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / LAKE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-52
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and a club house. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 53.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.35 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X X X 4 2.1% 98.5%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 96.4%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 93.3%
55 X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 90.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 87.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.2% 82.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.2% 77.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 70.1%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.8% 62.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 52.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.2% 44.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 36.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.7% 28.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.2% 22.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.2% 16.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 10.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 7.7%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 5.2%
40 X X X 3 1.5% 2.6%
X X 2 1.0% 1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 194
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-52
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE JERONIMO RD TO TOLEDO WAY
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.5%
58 X 98.5%
57 X 96.4%
56 X 93.3%
55 X 90.7%
54 X 87.1%
53 X 82.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
52 X 77.3% }PACE
51 X 70.1% }PACE
50 X 62.4% }PACE
49 X 52.6% }PACE
48 X 44.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 36.6% }PACE
46 X 28.9% }PACE
45 X 22.2% }PACE
44 X 16.0% }PACE
43 X 10.8% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 7.7%
41 X 5.2%
40 X 2.6%
39 X 1.0%
38 X 0.0%
HCI
38 X 0.0%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 53 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 53.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-52
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FERNLEAF
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.15
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.05
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.02
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 39 7.80 0.95
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOLEDO / SERRANO / CHINOOK / TRABUCO CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO (sch) / CHINOOK / TRABUCO 30,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TOLEDO / SERRANO (sch) / CHINOOK / TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-53
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a six-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and commercial.
The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.9 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collisions, two (2) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.74 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.6%
X X X X 4 1.9% 97.2%
55 X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 95.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 91.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.4% 79.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.9% 71.0%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.9% 62.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.3% 54.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.4% 44.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 36.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.4% 30.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.1% 22.0%
X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 16.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 13.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 9.8%
X X X X 4 1.9% 6.5%
40 X X X X X 5 2.3% 4.7%
X X X X 4 1.9% 2.3%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 214
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-53
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOLEDO WAY TO TRABUCO RD
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.5%
57 X 98.6%
56 X 97.2%
55 X 95.3%
54 X 91.6% }PACE
53 X 85.5% }PACE
52 X 79.4% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 71.0% }PACE
50 X 62.1% }PACE
49 X 54.2% }PACE
48 X 44.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 36.4% }PACE
46 X 30.4% }PACE
45 X 22.0% }PACE
44 X 16.8%
43 X 13.6% - - - - - -15PCT
42 X 9.8%
41 X 6.5%
40 X 4.7%
39 X 2.3%
38 X 0.5%
HCI
38 X 0.5%
37 X 0.0%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-53
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FERNLEAF
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 64.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.32
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.11
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 38 7.60 1.35
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO / NEWVALE-CAÑADA / PITTSFORD CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / NEWVALE-CAÑADA / PITTSFORD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
21,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO / NEWVALE-CAÑADA / PITTSFORD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-54
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business, commercial and a church. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had nine (9) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, three (3) involved a serious injury, one (1) involved a pedestrian, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.71 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X X 2 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X X X X 4 1.6% 99.2%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 97.5%
55 X X X X X X X X 8 3.3% 94.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.1% 91.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.9% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 7.4% 82.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 8.2% 74.9%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7.8% 66.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 8.2% 58.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.2% 50.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.2% 44.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6.6% 38.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.9% 31.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.7% 26.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4.9% 23.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.1% 18.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 3.7% 14.0%
40 X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 10.3%
X X X X X X X 7 2.9% 7.4%
X X X X X 5 2.1% 4.5%
X X X 3 1.2% 2.5%
X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 0.8% 1.2%
35 X 1 0.4% 0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 243
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 64.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.7 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-54
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TRABUCO RD TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.2%
57 X 99.2%
56 X 97.5%
55 X 94.7%
54 X 91.4% }PACE
53 X 87.2% }PACE
52 X 82.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 74.9% }PACE
50 X 66.7% }PACE
49 X 58.8% }PACE
48 X 50.6% }PACE
47 X 44.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 38.3% }PACE
45 X 31.7% }PACE
44 X 26.7%
43 X 23.0%
42 X 18.1%
41 X 14.0% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.3%
39 X 7.4%
38 X 4.5%
HCI
38 X 4.5%
37 X 2.5%
36 X 1.2%
35 X 0.4%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 64.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.7 %
Lake Forest 2024-54
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PITTSFORD DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FOREST RIDGE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 62.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.04
TOTAL COLLISIONS 18 3.60 0.78
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PITTSFORD / VINTAGE WOODS / DIMENSION
CROSSWALKS AT PITTSFORD / VINTAGE WOODS / DIMENSION
17,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT PITTSFORD / VINTAGE WOODS / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) /BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL (Gas Station) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lake Forest 2024-55
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), business and a gas station. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had two (2) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a serious injury, and one (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.71 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PITTSFORD DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.3% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.0% 99.7%
X X X X X 5 1.7% 98.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.5% 96.9%
55 X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 93.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.8% 91.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 4.8% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 74.4%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.9% 67.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 6.6% 61.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.5% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 49.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.5% 42.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 6.9% 37.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5.5% 30.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 5.9% 24.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4.5% 18.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 3.5% 14.2%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 2.8% 10.7%
X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 8.0%
X X X X X X X 7 2.4% 5.5%
X X X X 4 1.4% 3.1%
X X 2 0.7% 1.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 0.7% 1.7%
35 X X 2 0.7% 1.0%
X 1 0.3% 0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 289
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 62.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.7 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-55
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PITTSFORD DR TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.7%
57 X 98.6%
56 X 96.9%
55 X 93.4%
54 X 91.0%
53 X 86.2%
52 X 81.3% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 74.4% }PACE
50 X 67.5% }PACE
49 X 61.6% }PACE
48 X 55.0% }PACE
47 X 49.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
46 X 42.6% }PACE
45 X 37.0% }PACE
44 X 30.1% }PACE
43 X 24.6% }PACE
42 X 18.7%
41 X 14.2% - - - - - -15PCT
40 X 10.7%
39 X 8.0%
38 X 5.5%
HCI
38 X 5.5%
37 X 3.1%
36 X 1.7%
35 X 1.0%
34 X 0.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 47.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 62.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.7 %
Lake Forest 2024-55
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF VISTA TERRACE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 52.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 45 - 54 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH (WB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.21
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 2 0.40 0.07
TOTAL COLLISIONS 36 7.20 1.26
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DIMENSION / REGENCY / VISTA TERRACE/ RANCHO / 241 RAMPS / TOWN CTR
CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSION / REGENCY / VISTA TERRACE / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE 19,600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT DIMENSION / REGENCY / VISTA TERRACE / RANCHO / TOWN CENTRE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / HOTEL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
File: Lake Forest 2024-56
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, business and hotels. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 52.5 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 50 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had six (6) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) involved a serious injury, and two (2) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.80 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X X 2 0.9% 99.1%
X X X X 4 1.8% 98.2%
55 X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.5% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.9% 82.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.7% 75.7%
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.7% 67.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.3% 58.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.2% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 40.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 34.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.4% 29.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.6% 23.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.0% 18.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.1% 12.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 8.7%
40 X X X X X 5 2.3% 5.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 2.8%
X 1 0.5% 1.4%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 218
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.4 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-56
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE DIMENSION DR TO TOWNE CENTRE DR
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 99.5%
57 X 99.1%
56 X 98.2%
55 X 96.3%
54 X 93.1% }PACE
53 X 87.6% }PACE
52 X 82.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
51 X 75.7% }PACE
50 X 67.0% }PACE
49 X 58.3% }PACE
48 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
47 X 40.8% }PACE
46 X 34.9% }PACE
45 X 29.8% }PACE
44 X 23.4%
43 X 18.8%
42 X 12.8% - - - - - -15PCT
41 X 8.7%
40 X 5.0%
39 X 2.8%
38 X 1.4%
HCI
38 X 1.4%
37 X 0.9%
36 X 0.5%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 54 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 52.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 48.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.4 %
Lake Forest 2024-56
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOWNE CENTER DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OFPORTOLA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (WB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 1.84
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
8,500
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TOWNE CENTRE / PORTOLA
CROSSWALKS AT TOWNE CENTRE / PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Lake Forest 2024-57
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 45 mph speed limit sign in the eastbound direction.
0.14 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOWNE CENTER DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
50 X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
X X X 3 2.1% 97.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 95.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 91.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 83.6%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.0% 77.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.9% 66.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 57.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.9% 47.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 38.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 31.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 21.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 15.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 8.9%
X X X 3 2.1% 4.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 2.1% 4.1%
35 X X X 3 2.1% 2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 146
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-57
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE TOWNE CENTER DR TO PORTOLA PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.3%
49 X 97.9%
48 X 95.9%
47 X 91.1% }PACE
46 X 83.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 77.4% }PACE
44 X 66.4% }PACE
43 X 57.5% }PACE
42 X 47.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 38.4% }PACE
40 X 31.5% }PACE
39 X 21.2% }PACE
38 X 15.1% }PACE
HCI
38 X 15.1% }PACE
37 X 8.9% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 4.1%
35 X 2.1%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.9 %
Lake Forest 2024-57
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PORTOLA PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ALTER
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.24
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 2.17
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA, STOP - BAKE
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA
6,300
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/14/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER NO RV PARKING THIS BLOCK
BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT -GRADUAL DOWNHILL (WB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE & SOLID DBL YELLOW
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
File: Lake Forest 2024-58
This segment of Lake Forest Drive is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely commercial. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 49.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had one (1) collision involved a serious injury, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.36 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PORTOLA PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
55 0 0.0% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 97.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 93.1%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 83.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 75.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 69.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 60.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.3% 50.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 39.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 31.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 22.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 14.5%
40 X X X X X 5 3.1% 8.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 5.7%
X X 2 1.3% 3.8%
X X 2 1.3% 2.5%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.8 %
File: Lake Forest 2024-58
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAKE FOREST DRIVE PORTOLA PKWY TO BAKE PKWY
DATE: 3/14/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 99.4%
55 X 99.4%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.1%
52 X 97.5%
51 X 93.1%
50 X 88.7% }PACE
49 X 83.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 75.5% }PACE
47 X 69.2% }PACE
46 X 60.4% }PACE
45 X 50.9% }PACE
44 X 39.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 31.4% }PACE
42 X 22.0% }PACE
41 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
40 X 8.8%
39 X 5.7%
38 X 3.8%
HCI
38 X 3.8%
37 X 2.5%
36 X 1.3%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.8 %
Lake Forest 2024-58
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAMBERT STREET ASPAN ST TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LAKE FOREST
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - ASPAN / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT ASPAN / LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING 10pm-6am
MANY AREAS OF RED CURB
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER NO STRIPING
ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Lambert 2024-59
The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 3.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.17 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAMBERT STREET ASPAN ST TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
40 X 1 0.6% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X 2 1.3% 96.9%
X X X X 4 2.5% 95.6%
X 1 0.6% 93.1%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 92.5%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.6% 93.1%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 89.3%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 84.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 81.1%
X X 2 1.3% 76.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 75.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 66.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 59.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 56.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 45.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.3% 37.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 25.8%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 17.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 11.9%
20 X X X X X X 6 3.8% 7.5%
X X X X 4 2.5% 3.8%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
File: Lambert 2024-59
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LAMBERT STREET ASPAN ST TO LAKE FOREST DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 98.7%
39 X 98.1%
38 X 96.9%
HCI
38 X 96.9%
37 X 95.6%
36 X 93.1%
35 X 92.5%
34 X 89.3%
33 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
32 X 81.1%
31 X 76.7%
30 X 75.5% }PACE
29 X 66.7% }PACE
28 X 59.7% }PACE
27 X 56.0% }PACE
26 X 45.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 37.1% }PACE
24 X 25.8% }PACE
23 X 20.8% }PACE
22 X 17.6% }PACE
21 X 11.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 7.5%
19 X 3.8%
18 X 1.3%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
Lambert 2024-59
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF DALEVIEW
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.54
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD
24,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SCE SUB-STATION / WATER DISTRICT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Los Alisos 2024-60
NP = NOT POSTED
This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), SCE sub- station and a water district. Field notes state the roadway has slight to gradual curves, no stopping any time, bike lanes and bus stops. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 44.4 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 35 to 44 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.29 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 1.2% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X X X 3 1.8% 98.2%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 93.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 77.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 71.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.0% 65.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.4% 57.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 50.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.6% 43.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 35.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 29.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 29.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 23.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 17.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 12.9%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 7.4%
X X X 3 1.8% 4.3%
30 X X X 3 1.8% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 163
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.2 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-60
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT (I-5 FWY) TO ROCKFIELD BL DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:50 AM - 12:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.8%
48 X 98.2%
47 X 96.3%
46 X 93.3%
45 X 88.3%
44 X 82.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 77.9% }PACE
42 X 71.8% }PACE
41 X 65.6% }PACE
40 X 57.7% }PACE
39 X 50.3% }PACE
38 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 35.0% }PACE
36 X 29.4% }PACE
35 X 23.3% }PACE
34 X 17.2%
33 X 12.9% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 7.4%
31 X 4.3%
30 X 2.5%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.2 %
Los Alisos 2024-60
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MUIRLANDS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (EB) / 50 (WB)
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
ACCIDENTS PER YEAR ACC./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 0.20 0.05
FATALITY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY ACCIDENTS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 8 1.60 0.44
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION / 3 LANES (EB btwn Brough and Muirlands)
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS
27,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ROCKFIELD / MUIRLANDS
CROSSWALKS AT ROCKFIELD (sch) / MUIRLANDS (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO (EB) / YES (WB)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (EB) / PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS NO STOPPING ANYTIME 2pm-6pm (WB)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UPHILL GRADE (EB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (WB) - YES / YES (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / EL TORO PARK / CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - CONFLICTING SPEED, REMOVE 50 MPH (WB) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Los Alisos 2024-61
This segment of Los Alisos Boulevard has two (2) to three (3) lanes in each direction. The adjacent land uses are residential (non- fronting), park and church. Field notes show that this segment has conflicting speed limits with a 45 mph speed limit posted in the eastbound direction and a 50 mph speed limit posted in the westbound direction. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 39 to 48 mph, it is recommended that the existing 50 mph speed limit be reduced to 45 mph.
0.37 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 1.4% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.4% 98.2%
X X X X 4 1.8% 96.8%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 95.0%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5% 88.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 83.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 78.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.7% 71.8%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.6% 64.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.9% 55.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.4% 49.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 43.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 36.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.9% 29.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.5% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 18.2%
X X X X X X X 7 3.2% 13.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 10.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 3.6% 10.0%
35 X X X X X X 6 2.7% 6.4%
X X X 3 1.4% 3.6%
X X X 3 1.4% 2.3%
X 1 0.5% 0.9%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 220
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.2 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-61
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD ROCKFIELD BL TO MUIRLANDS BL
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.5%
53 X 98.2%
52 X 96.8%
51 X 95.0%
50 X 91.8%
49 X 88.2%
48 X 83.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 78.6% }PACE
46 X 71.8% }PACE
45 X 64.1% }PACE
44 X 55.5% }PACE
43 X 49.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 43.2% }PACE
41 X 36.4% }PACE
40 X 29.5% }PACE
39 X 23.6% }PACE
38 X 18.2%
HCI
38 X 18.2%
37 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 10.0%
35 X 6.4%
34 X 3.6%
33 X 2.3%
32 X 0.9%
31 X 0.5%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.2 %
Los Alisos 2024-61
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:55 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BRUSSELS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH /*25 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.13
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.35
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
28,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MUIRLANDS / JERONIMO
CROSSWALKS AT MUIRLANDS (sch) / JERONIMO (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / SCHOOL / PARK / BUSINESS (at Jeronimo) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING, * 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Los Alisos 2024-62 The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 3.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.59 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:55 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 97.9%
X X X X 4 2.1% 96.3%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.3% 94.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 89.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 85.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 80.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.6% 73.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 63.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 54.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0% 45.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.1% 38.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 29.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.5% 24.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 17.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 13.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 8.6%
X X X X 4 2.1% 5.3%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X 4 2.1% 5.3%
35 X X 2 1.1% 3.2%
X X X 3 1.6% 2.1%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 187
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-62
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD MUIRLANDS BL TO JERONIMO RD
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:55 PM - 1:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 98.9%
52 X 97.9%
51 X 96.3%
50 X 94.1%
49 X 89.8% }PACE
48 X 85.0% }PACE
47 X 80.2% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 73.3% }PACE
45 X 63.6% }PACE
44 X 54.5% }PACE
43 X 45.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 38.5% }PACE
41 X 29.4% }PACE
40 X 24.6% }PACE
39 X 17.1%
38 X 13.4% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 13.4% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 8.6%
36 X 5.3%
35 X 3.2%
34 X 2.1%
33 X 0.5%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.1 %
Los Alisos 2024-62
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD JERONIMO RD TO MADERO
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF 2ND ST
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.06
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.06
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.06
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.52
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
28,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/18/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - JERONIMO / TARGET / MADERO
CROSSWALKS AT JERONIMO / TARGET / MADERO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
ON-STREET PARKING NO
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
NO STOPPING ANYTIME ENTIRE BLOCK
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE (Btwn Target & Madero)
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - YES / ONE (EB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / GAS STATION (at Madero) / COMMERCIAL (at Jeronimo) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Los Alisos 2024-63
* 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.33 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD JERONIMO RD TO MADERO
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.5% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.5%
X X 2 1.1% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.6% 98.4%
X X X X 4 2.1% 96.8%
50 X X X X X 5 2.6% 94.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 92.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 87.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.9% 83.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.5% 76.2%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.6% 66.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.0% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.5% 47.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.9% 37.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 30.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.3% 24.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 19.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 14.8%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 10.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 7.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 3.2% 7.4%
35 X X X X 4 2.1% 4.2%
X X X 3 1.6% 2.1%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 189
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
File: Los Alisos 2024-63
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
LOS ALISOS BOULEVARD JERONIMO RD TO MADERO
DATE: 3/18/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.5%
53 X 99.5%
52 X 98.4%
51 X 96.8%
50 X 94.7%
49 X 92.1% }PACE
48 X 87.8% }PACE
47 X 83.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
46 X 76.2% }PACE
45 X 66.7% }PACE
44 X 56.1% }PACE
43 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 37.6% }PACE
41 X 30.7% }PACE
40 X 24.3% }PACE
39 X 19.0%
38 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 10.1%
36 X 7.4%
35 X 4.2%
34 X 2.1%
33 X 0.5%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
Los Alisos 2024-63
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MONARCH BOULEVARD ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF GOLDEN ROD
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.09
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALTON
CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
1,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/29/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT ALTON / DIMENSION
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ENTIRE BLOCK
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
CUT OUT PARKING (SB) at Golden Rod
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Alton) / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ROUND-ABOUT AT DIMENSION-CATALINA
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Monarch 2024-64
This segment of Monarch Bolevard is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are parks, a club house and residential (non- fronting). Field notes state the roadway has a constant sweeping “C” curve and roundabout at Dimension Drive. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 39.7 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 35 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there are parks and a club house within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
0.53 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MONARCH BOULEVARD ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
45 0 0.0% 99.2%
X X 2 1.7% 99.2%
X 1 0.8% 97.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 96.7%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 97.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 96.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.8% 91.7%
40 X X X X 4 3.3% 86.0%
X X X X 4 3.3% 82.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 79.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.6% 70.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 58.7%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.4% 47.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 35.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 27.3%
X X X X 4 3.3% 19.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 15.7%
30 X X 2 1.7% 10.7%
X X 2 1.7% 9.1%
X X 2 1.7% 7.4%
X X 2 1.7% 5.8%
X X 2 1.7% 4.1%
25 X 1 0.8% 2.5%
0 0.0% 1.7%
X 1 0.8% 1.7%
0 0.0% 0.8%
0 0.0% 0.8%
20 0 0.0% 0.8%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
File: Monarch 2024-64
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MONARCH BOULEVARD ALTON PKWY TO DIMENSION DR
DATE: 4/29/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.2%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 97.5%
HCI
43 X 97.5%
42 X 96.7% }PACE
41 X 91.7% }PACE
40 X 86.0% }PACE
39 X 82.6% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.3% }PACE
37 X 70.2% }PACE
36 X 58.7% }PACE
35 X 47.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 35.5% }PACE
33 X 27.3% }PACE
32 X 19.0%
31 X 15.7%
30 X 10.7% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 9.1%
28 X 7.4%
27 X 5.8%
26 X 4.1%
25 X 2.5%
24 X 1.7%
23 X 1.7%
22 X 0.8%
21 X 0.8%
20 X 0.8%
19 X 0.8%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.0 %
A - 2
Monarch 2024-64
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MONTCLIFF DRIVE RIMHURST DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH (NB)
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/7/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RIMHURST / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING 10am-2pm, 2nd & 4th THURSDAY
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PARTIAL SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (shopping Ctr) / BUSINESS (at El Toro) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SOUTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Montcliff 2024-65 The recommended 30 mph speed limit is 1.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
For enforcement, it is recommended to install a 30 mph speed limit sign in the southbound direction.
0.19 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MONTCLIFF DRIVE RIMHURST DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.5% 99.1%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 95.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 84.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 77.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 68.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 61.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 53.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 42.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.7% 34.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 24.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.0% 17.7%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 9.7%
X X X X 4 3.5% 5.3%
20 X X 2 1.8% 1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 113
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.7 %
File: Montcliff 2024-65
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MONTCLIFF DRIVE RIMHURST DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/7/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 95.6%
32 X 91.2% }PACE
31 X 84.1% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
30 X 77.0% }PACE
29 X 68.1% }PACE
28 X 61.1% }PACE
27 X 53.1% }PACE
26 X 42.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 34.5% }PACE
24 X 24.8% }PACE
23 X 17.7% }PACE
22 X 9.7% - - - - - -15PCT
21 X 5.3%
20 X 1.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.7 %
Montcliff 2024-65
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT (650' s/o BAKE) TO LAKE FOREST DR DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF FERGREEN
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.17
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.50
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
13,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LAKE FOREST / ASPEN-OAKWOOD
CROSSWALKS AT LAKE FOREST / ASPEN-OAKWOOD
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - YES / YES (SB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Lake Forest) / RESIDENTIAL (NF-Mobile Homes) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-66
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 4.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT (650' s/o BAKE) TO LAKE FOREST DR DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
55 X X X X 4 2.5% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 96.9%
X 1 0.6% 95.6%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 95.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 91.2%
50 X X X X 4 2.5% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 76.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 62.3%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1% 56.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 37.7%
X X X X 4 2.5% 29.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 27.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 21.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 15.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 13.2%
X X X X 4 2.5% 6.9%
X 1 0.6% 4.4%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.6% 4.4%
35 X X X X 4 2.5% 3.8%
0 0.0% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
0 0.0% 0.6%
0 0.0% 0.6%
30 X 1 0.6% 0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
File: Muirlands 2024-66
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT (650' s/o BAKE) TO LAKE FOREST DR DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 99.4%
54 X 96.9%
53 X 95.6%
52 X 95.0%
51 X 91.2%
50 X 85.5%
49 X 83.0% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
48 X 76.1% }PACE
47 X 69.8% }PACE
46 X 62.3% }PACE
45 X 56.6% }PACE
44 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 37.7% }PACE
42 X 29.6% }PACE
41 X 27.0% }PACE
40 X 21.4% }PACE
39 X 15.1%
38 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
HCI
38 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
37 X 6.9%
36 X 4.4%
35 X 3.8%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 1.3%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.6%
30 X 0.6%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 49.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
Muirlands 2024-66
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF OSWEGO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 17 3.40 1.03
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
19,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / VILLAGE CTR-DYLAN / LAKE FOREST
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE / VILLAGE CTR-DYLAN / LAKE FOREST
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL"S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Lake Forest & El Toro & Ridge Route) / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-67
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 1.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.47 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.2% 99.3%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 97.0%
50 X X 2 1.5% 93.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 91.9%
X 1 0.7% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.9% 86.7%
X X X X 4 3.0% 80.7%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.7% 77.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 71.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 63.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 16.3% 56.3% X X X X X X X X X 9 6.7% 40.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.1% 33.3%
X X X X 4 3.0% 22.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 19.3%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 14.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 11.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 11.1%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.4% 6.7%
X 1 0.7% 2.2%
X 1 0.7% 1.5%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 135
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: Muirlands 2024-67
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 99.3%
51 X 97.0%
50 X 93.3%
49 X 91.9%
48 X 87.4%
47 X 86.7% }PACE
46 X 80.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 77.8% }PACE
44 X 71.1% }PACE
43 X 63.7% }PACE
42 X 56.3% }PACE
41 X 40.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 33.3% }PACE
39 X 22.2% }PACE
38 X 19.3% }PACE
HCI
38 X 19.3% }PACE
37 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 11.1%
35 X 6.7%
34 X 2.2%
33 X 1.5%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
Muirlands 2024-67
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ENTRADOS
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.05
TOTAL COLLISIONS 25 5.00 1.15
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - RIDGE ROUTE / EL TORO
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
20,900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE (sch) / EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND & 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at El Toro & Ridge Route) / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-68
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting) and commercial at El Toro Road. The speed data shows an 85th percentile speed of 48.3 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had four (4) speed-related collisions, one (1) involved a fatality, one (1) collision involved a serious injury, (1) involved a pedestrian, and (1) involved a bicyclist, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a “Safety Corridor” which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.57 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 98.2%
X X X 3 1.8% 95.3%
50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 93.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 88.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 83.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.8% 78.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.8% 69.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 15.3% 60.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.4% 45.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.4% 35.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 26.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 20.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.8% 15.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 6.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.8%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%
0.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0.0%
35 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 170
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
File: Muirlands 2024-68
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD RIDGE ROUTE DR TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:25 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.4%
53 X 98.8%
52 X 98.2%
51 X 95.3%
50 X 93.5%
49 X 88.8% }PACE
48 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
47 X 78.2% }PACE
46 X 69.4% }PACE
45 X 60.6% }PACE
44 X 45.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
43 X 35.9% }PACE
42 X 26.5% }PACE
41 X 20.0% }PACE
40 X 15.3% }PACE
39 X 6.5% - - - - - -15PCT
38 X 1.8%
HCI
38 X 1.8%
37 X 1.2%
36 X 0.0%
35 X 0.0%
34 X 0.0%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 44.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
Muirlands 2024-68
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD EL TORO ROAD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EL TORO
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.11
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 4 0.80 0.21
TOTAL COLLISIONS 31 6.20 1.63
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LOS ALISOS / EL TORO / PARKVIEW
CROSSWALKS AT LOS ALISOS / EL TORO / PARKVIEW
21,700
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/19/2024
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT LOS ALISOS / EL TORO / PARKVIEW
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / EL TORO PARK & HEROES PARK (at Los Alisos) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Muirlands 2024-69
This segment of Muirlands Boulevard is a four-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial at El Toro Road and parks and intermediate at Los Alisos Boulevard. The speed data shows an 85th percentile of speed of 46.8 mph, which may suggest a speed limit of 45 mph. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with “high concentrations of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of this segment, there is a school, park or commercial shopping center within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 45 mph speed limit be reduced to 40 mph.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD EL TORO ROAD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.7%
X 1 0.7% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.0%
50 X X X X X 5 3.3% 96.7%
X X X X 4 2.6% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 90.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 86.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 79.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.6% 74.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.9% 61.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6% 53.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.9% 37.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.3% 29.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 20.5%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 16.6%
X X X X 4 2.6% 13.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 10.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 10.6%
35 X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 6.6%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
0 0.0% 0.7%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%
0.0%
30 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 151
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.6 %
File: Muirlands 2024-69
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
MUIRLANDS BOULEVARD EL TORO ROAD TO LOS ALISOS BL
DATE: 3/19/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:20 PM - 1:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 99.3%
53 X 98.7%
52 X 98.7%
51 X 98.0%
50 X 96.7%
49 X 93.4%
48 X 90.7% }PACE
47 X 86.8% }PACE
46 X 79.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
45 X 74.2% }PACE
44 X 61.6% }PACE
43 X 53.6% }PACE
42 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 37.7% }PACE
40 X 29.8% }PACE
39 X 20.5% }PACE
38 X 16.6%
HCI
38 X 16.6%
37 X 13.2% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 10.6%
35 X 6.6%
34 X 2.0%
33 X 0.7%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.6 %
Muirlands 2024-69
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
NORMANDALE DRIVE OSTERMAN RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF VISTA ESTATE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 1.07
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.36
TOTAL COLLISIONS 9 1.80 3.20
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL TORO, STOP - OSTERMAN
CROSSWALKS AT EL TORO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME & NO STOPPING ANYTIME (Areas of)
AREAS OF RED CURB
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / ONE (NB) / YES / NO (SB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER NO OVERNIGHT VEHICLES
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMUNITY TENNIS COURTS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Normandale 2024-70
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.55 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
NORMANDALE DRIVE OSTERMAN RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X X 2 1.7% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.5% 98.3%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 94.8%
X X X 3 2.6% 89.6%
40 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 87.0%
X X X X 4 3.5% 81.7%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 78.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 72.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 63.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.3% 53.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.4% 63.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.3% 53.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 41.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 33.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 27.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 18.3%
30 X X X X X 5 4.3% 13.0%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 8.7%
X X 2 1.7% 3.5%
0 0.0% 1.7%
X 1 0.9% 1.7%
25 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.5 %
File: Normandale 2024-70
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
NORMANDALE DRIVE OSTERMAN RD TO EL TORO RD
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:15 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 98.3%
42 X 94.8%
41 X 89.6%
40 X 87.0%
39 X 81.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 78.3% }PACE
HCI
38 X 78.3% }PACE
37 X 72.2% }PACE
36 X 63.5% }PACE
35 X 53.0% }PACE
34 X 41.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 33.9% }PACE
32 X 27.0% }PACE
31 X 18.3% }PACE
30 X 13.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 8.7% }PACE
28 X 3.5%
27 X 1.7%
26 X 1.7%
25 X 0.9%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 21.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.5 %
Normandale 2024-70
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OLYMPUS SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO CIVIC CENTER DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PALISADE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 91.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT NP
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS YIELD - SERRANO SUMITT / CIVIC CENTER, STOP - PALISADE 800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
7/16/2024
HCI
TRAFFIC CONTROLS YIELD - SERRANO SUMITT / CIVIC CENTER, STOP - PALISADE
CROSSWALKS AT SERRANO SUMITT / PALISADE / CIVIC CENTER
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE
LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ROUNDABOUTS (at Serrano Sumitt / Civic Center)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL / CITY HALL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Olympus 2024-71
This segment of Olympus is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and City Hall. Field notes state that the roadway has roundabouts at Serrano Summit Drive and Civic Center Drive and has heave on-street parking. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 20 to 29 mph, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this segment.
0.17 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OLYMPUS SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO CIVIC CENTER DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.0% 100.0%
30 X X X X 4 3.8% 99.0%
X X X X 4 3.8% 95.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 91.4%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.5% 78.1%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.3% 68.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.3% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.4% 41.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.4% 28.6%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 16.2%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.7% 9.5%
X X 2 1.9% 3.8%
X 1 1.0% 1.9%
X 1 1.0% 1.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 105
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
File: Olympus 2024-71
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OLYMPUS SERRANO SUMMIT DR TO CIVIC CENTER DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 99.0%
29 X 95.2% }PACE
28 X 91.4% }PACE
27 X 84.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
26 X 78.1% }PACE
25 X 68.6% }PACE
24 X 55.2% }PACE
23 X 41.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 28.6% }PACE
21 X 16.2% }PACE
20 X 9.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
19 X 3.8%
18 X 1.9%
17 X 1.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
A - 2
Olympus 2024-71
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OSTERMAN ROAD REGENCY LN TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 5/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SIENA TERRANCE APTS ENTRANCE
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 36.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.34
TOTAL COLLISIONS 11 2.20 3.73
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
2,100
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
7/16/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - REGENCY / PITTSFORD
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING, 10am-2pm, 2nd-4th FRIDAY
MANY AREAS OF RED CURB
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of slight)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (EB) / YES / NO (WB)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / REGENCY PARK (at Regency) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Osterman 2024-72
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 1.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.77 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OSTERMAN ROAD REGENCY LN TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 X X X 3 2.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 97.5%
X X X X X 5 4.1% 95.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 90.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.9% 83.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 73.6%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.9% 83.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.7% 73.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 62.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1% 53.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.6% 44.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4% 38.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3% 30.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.8% 22.3%
X X X X X X 6 5.0% 16.5%
X X X X 4 3.3% 11.6%
X X X X 4 3.3% 8.3%
25 X X X 3 2.5% 5.0%
X X X 3 2.5% 2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File: Osterman 2024-72
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OSTERMAN ROAD REGENCY LN TO PITTSFORD DR
DATE: 7/16/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 97.5%
38 X 95.0%
HCI
38 X 95.0%
37 X 90.9% }PACE
36 X 83.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
35 X 73.6% }PACE
34 X 62.8% }PACE
33 X 53.7% }PACE
32 X 44.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 38.0% }PACE
30 X 30.6% }PACE
29 X 22.3% }PACE
28 X 16.5% }PACE
27 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
26 X 8.3%
25 X 5.0%
24 X 2.5%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
Osterman 2024-72
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OVERLAKE DRIVE LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF PINTREE & NORTH OF TWIN LAKES
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.94
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 1.87
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
900
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/21/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - LAKE FOREST / RIDGE ROUTE
CROSSWALKS AT RIDGE ROUTE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES & BEND RIGHT-BEND LEFT (at Pine Tree) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (many areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER NO STRIPING AFTER NEW SLURRY SEAL
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
File: Overlake 2024-73
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 4.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.65 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OVERLAKE DRIVE LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
35 X 1 0.8% 99.2%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
35 X 1 0.8% 99.2%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 98.3%
X X X X 4 3.4% 94.1%
X 1 0.8% 90.7%
X X X X X 5 4.2% 89.8%
30 X X 2 1.7% 85.6%
X X X X 4 3.4% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.9% 80.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 68.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.9% 62.7%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 15.3% 56.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 16.9% 41.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 24.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6% 16.9%
X X X X 4 3.4% 9.3%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.1% 5.9%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 118
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.8 %
File: Overlake 2024-73
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
OVERLAKE DRIVE LAKE FOREST DR TO RIDGE ROUTE DR
DATE: 3/21/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 99.2%
34 X 98.3%
33 X 94.1%
32 X 90.7%
31 X 89.8%
30 X 85.6%
29 X 83.9% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
28 X 80.5% }PACE
27 X 68.6% }PACE
26 X 62.7% }PACE
25 X 56.8% }PACE
24 X 41.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 24.6% }PACE
22 X 16.9% }PACE
21 X 9.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 5.9% }PACE
19 X 0.8%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.8 %
Overlake 2024-73
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PALMWOOD DRIVE PEACHWOOD (N) TO PEACHWOOD (S)
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 3:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF WISTERIA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 1.50
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 5.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PEACHWOOD (N) / PEACHWOOD (S)
600
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PEACHWOOD (N) / PEACHWOOD (S)
CROSSWALKS NONE
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (Heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING 10am-2pm 1st-3rd Wed (Street Sweeping)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE - SWEEPING "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Many Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (Multi-Family-NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Palmwood 2024-74
This segment of Palmwood Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land use is multifamily residential. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 33.9 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 25 to 34 mph, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 30 mph.
0.61 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PALMWOOD DRIVE PEACHWOOD (N) TO PEACHWOOD (S)
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 3:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 99.1%
X X 2 1.8% 97.2%
X X 2 1.8% 95.4%
X X 2 1.8% 93.6%
35 X X X X X X X 7 6.4% 91.7%
X X X X X 5 4.6% 85.3%
X X 2 1.8% 80.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.3% 78.9%
X X X X X X 6 5.5% 71.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.8% 66.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.2% 53.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.1% 44.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.9% 33.9%
X X X X 4 3.7% 22.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.0% 18.3%
X X X 3 2.8% 7.3%
X X X 3 2.8% 4.6%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
0 0.0% 0.9%
20 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 109
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.3 %
File: Palmwood 2024-74
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PALMWOOD DRIVE PEACHWOOD (N) TO PEACHWOOD (S)
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:30 PM - 3:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
HCI
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 99.1%
38 X 97.2%
37 X 95.4%
36 X 93.6%
35 X 91.7%
34 X 85.3% }PACE
33 X 80.7% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
32 X 78.9% }PACE
31 X 71.6% }PACE
30 X 66.1% }PACE
29 X 53.2% }PACE
28 X 44.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 33.9% }PACE
26 X 22.0% }PACE
25 X 18.3% }PACE
24 X 7.3% - - - - - -15PCT
23 X 4.6%
22 X 1.8%
21 X 0.9%
20 X 0.9%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.3 %
Palmwood 2024-74File:
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PALOMA PORTOLA PKWY TO ALTON PKWY-ROMANO
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF MIMOSA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.77
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/6/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PORTOLA
CROSSWALKS AT PORTOLA
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Coronado to Portola)
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED ISLAND / DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Paloma 2024-75
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.59 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PALOMA PORTOLA PKWY TO ALTON PKWY-ROMANO
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 99.2%
X X 2 1.6% 97.6%
X X X X 4 3.2% 96.0%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.6% 97.6%
X X X X 4 3.2% 96.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 92.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.2% 88.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.2% 80.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.0% 73.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.4% 65.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 59.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.8% 50.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.6% 41.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 32.0%
X X X X X X X 7 5.6% 26.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 20.8%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.8% 16.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.8% 11.2%
X X X X X 5 4.0% 6.4%
X X 2 1.6% 2.4%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%
25 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 125
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.8 %
File: Paloma 2024-75
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PALOMA PORTOLA PKWY TO ALTON PKWY-ROMANO
DATE: 5/6/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:20 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 99.2%
43 X 97.6%
HCI
44 X 99.2%
43 X 97.6%
42 X 96.0%
41 X 92.8% }PACE
40 X 88.0% }PACE
39 X 80.8% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 73.6% }PACE
37 X 65.6% }PACE
36 X 59.2% }PACE
35 X 50.4% }PACE
34 X 41.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 32.0% }PACE
32 X 26.4% }PACE
31 X 20.8%
30 X 16.0%
29 X 11.2% - - - - - -15PCT
28 X 6.4%
27 X 2.4%
26 X 0.8%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.8 %
Paloma 2024-75
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PASEO SOMBRA TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF PASEO VEREDA
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 35.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
800
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW (WB) - YES / NO (EB)
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / RANCHO SERRANO PARK / SMALL PARK / GREENBELT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Paseo Sombra 2024-76
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 0.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.48 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PASEO SOMBRA TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.1%
0 0.0% 99.1%
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
0 0.0% 99.1%
0 0.0% 99.1%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
40 X X 2 1.9% 98.1%
X X X X 4 3.7% 96.3%
0 0.0% 92.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.4% 86.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.3% 78.5%
X X X X X X X 7 6.5% 68.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.1% 61.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 48.6%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 41.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.2% 35.5%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 24.3%
X 1 0.9% 18.7%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 17.8%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 13.1%
25 X X X X X X 6 5.6% 8.4%
0 0.0% 2.8%
X 1 0.9% 2.8%
X X 2 1.9% 1.9%
0.0%
20 0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 107
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.8 %
File: Paseo Sombra 2024-76
RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PASEO SOMBRA TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
70 X 100.0%
69 X 100.0%
68 X 100.0%
67 X 100.0%
66 X 100.0%
65 X 100.0%
64 X 100.0%
63 X 100.0%
62 X 100.0%
61 X 100.0%
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.1%
HCI
43 X 99.1%
42 X 99.1%
41 X 99.1%
40 X 98.1%
39 X 96.3%
38 X 92.5%
37 X 92.5% }PACE
36 X 86.9% }PACE
35 X 78.5% }PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT
34 X 68.2% }PACE
33 X 61.7% }PACE
32 X 48.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 41.1% }PACE
30 X 35.5% }PACE
29 X 24.3% }PACE
28 X 18.7% }PACE
27 X 17.8%
26 X 13.1% - - - - - -15PCT
25 X 8.4%
24 X 2.8%
23 X 2.8%
22 X 1.9%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.8 %
A - 2
Paseo Sombra 2024-76
C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PASEO TRANQUILO TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF CALLE ARENAL
DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 36.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
COLLISION HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
TRAFFIC FACTORS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
1,200
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/28/2024
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - TRABUCO
CROSSWALKS AT TRABUCO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED, NONE OBSERVED
OTHER
ROADWAY FACTORS
LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL - MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)
ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO
STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE (SKIP LINE)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
NF = NON-FRONTING File: Paseo Tranquilo 2024-77
The recommended 35 mph speed limit is 1.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.
0.44 C I T Y O F L A K E F O R E S T
PASEO TRANQUILO TRABUCO RD TO PASEO CIPRES
DATE: 3/28/2024 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.
SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
70 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%