• Order and maintain subscriptions to access Motorola’s LXP. • Contact Motorola Solutions to engage Technical Support when needed.
Motorola Deliverables
• LXP Enable
INSTRUCTOR-LED TRAINING (ONSITE AND REMOTE)
A list of Instructor-Led and Virtual Instructor-Led courses can be found in the Training Plan.
Motorola Responsibilities
• Deliver User Guides and training materials in electronic .PDF format. • Perform training in accordance with the Training Plan. • Provide Customer with training Attendance Rosters and summarize any pertinent observations that may impact end user training.
Customer Responsibilities
• Supply classrooms with a workstation for the instructor (if Onsite) and at least one workstation for every student based on the requirements listed in the Training Plan. • Designate training representatives who will work with the Motorola trainers in the delivery of training. • Conduct end user training in accordance with the Project Schedule.
Motorola Deliverables
• Electronic versions of User Guides and training materials. • Attendance Rosters.
• Technical Training Catalog.
FUNCTIONAL VALIDATION AND PROJECT CLOSURE
The objective of Functional Validation is to demonstrate the features and functions of the system in the Customer’s provisioned environment. The functional demonstration may not exercise all functions of the system, if identified as not being applicable to the Customer’s operations or for which the system has not been provisioned. The functional demonstration is a critical activity that must occur following the completion of provisioning.
Motorola Responsibilities
• Conduct a power on functional demonstration of the installed system per the deployment checklist • Manage to resolution any documented punch list items noted on the deployment checklist. • Provide trip report outlining all activities completed during the installation as well as outstanding follow up items
• Provide an overview of the support process and how to request support. • Walk through support resources, web ticket entry and escalation procedures. • Provide a customer survey upon closure of the project.
Customer Responsibilities
QUOTE-2561947
V700 VaaS w 4RE ELC
Any sales transaction following Motorola's quote is based on and subject to the terms and conditions of the valid and executed written contract between Customer and Motorola (the ""Underlying Agreement"") that authorizes Customer to purchase equipment and/or services or license software (collectively ""Products""). If no Underlying Agreement exists between Motorola and Customer, then Motorola's Standard Terms of Use and Motorola's Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Supply shall govern the purchase of the Products.
• Witness the functional demonstration and acknowledge its completion via signature on the deployment checklist.
• Participate in prioritizing the punch list.
• Coordinate and manage Customer action as noted in the punch list. • Provide signatory approval on the deployment checklist providing Motorola with final acceptance. • Complete Customer Survey.
QUOTE-2561947
V700 VaaS w 4RE ELC
Any sales transaction following Motorola's quote is based on and subject to the terms and conditions of the valid and executed written contract between Customer and Motorola (the ""Underlying Agreement"") that authorizes Customer to purchase equipment and/or services or license software (collectively ""Products""). If no Underlying Agreement exists between Motorola and Customer, then Motorola's Standard Terms of Use and Motorola's Standard Terms and Conditions of Sales and Supply shall govern the purchase of the Products.
Purchase Order Checklist
Purchase Order Checklist
Marked as PO/ Contract/ Notice to Proceed on Company Letterhead (PO will not be processed without this)
PO Number/ Contract Number
PO Date
Vendor = Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Payment (Billing) Terms/ State Contract Number
Bill-To Name on PO must be equal to the Legal Bill-To Name Bill-To Address
Ship-To Address (If we are shipping to a MR location, it must be documented on PO) Ultimate Address (If the Ship-To address is the MR location then the Ultimate Destination address must be documented on PO )
PO Amount must be equal to or greater than Order Total
Non-Editable Format (Word/ Excel templates cannot be accepted) Bill To Contact Name & Phone # and EMAIL for customer accounts payable dept Ship To Contact Name & Phone #
Tax Exemption Status
Signatures (As required)
California Legal References
State Agencies:
Cal. Pub. Con. Code § 10298. Consolidation of needs of multiple state agencies; assistance to local governments. (a) The director may consolidate the needs of multiple state agencies for goods, information technology, and services, and, pursuant to the procedures established in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 12100), establish contracts, master agreements, multiple award schedules, cooperative agreements, including agreements with entities outside the state, and other types of agreements that leverage the state's buying power, for acquisitions authorized under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10290), Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 12100), and Chapter 3.6 (commencing with Section 12125). State and local agencies may contract with suppliers awarded those contracts without further competitive bidding.
Local Governments:
Cal. Gov. Code § 6502. Authority for agreement; out-of-state agencies.
If authorized by their legislative or other governing bodies, two or more public agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties, including, but not limited to, the authority to levy a fee, assessment, or tax, even though one or more of the contracting agencies may be located outside this state.
It shall not be necessary that any power common to the contracting parties be exercisable by each such contracting party with respect to the geographical area in which such power is to be jointly exercised. For purposes of this section, two or more public agencies having the power to conduct agricultural, livestock, industrial, cultural, or other fairs or exhibitions shall be deemed to have common power with respect to any such fair or exhibition conducted by any one or more of such public agencies or by an entity created pursuant to a joint powers agreement entered into by such public agencies.
School Districts:
Cal. Pub. Con. Code § 20118. Authorization of public corporation or agency to make leases or purchases; warrants; costs of corporation or agency.
Notwithstanding Sections 20111 and 20112, the governing board of any school district, without advertising for bids, if the board has determined it to be in the best interests of the district, may authorize by contract, lease, requisition, or purchase order, any public corporation or agency, including any county, city, town, or district, to lease data-processing equipment, purchase materials, supplies, equipment, automotive vehicles, tractors, and other personal property for the district in the manner in which the public corporation or agency is authorized by law to make the leases or purchases from a vendor. Upon receipt of the personal property, if the property complies with the specifications set forth in the contract, lease, requisition, or purchase order, the school district may draw a warrant in favor of the public corporation or agency for the amount of the approved invoice, including the reasonable costs to the public corporation or agency for furnishing the services incidental to the lease or purchase of the personal property, or the school district may make payment directly to the vendor. Alternatively, if there is an existing contract between a public corporation or agency and a vendor for the lease or purchase of the personal property, a school district may authorize the lease or purchase of personal property directly from the vendor by contract, lease, requisition, or purchase order and make payment to the vendor under the same terms that are available to the public corporation or agency under the contract.
About Sourcewell:
Sourcewell is a service cooperative created by the Minnesota legislature as a local unit of government. Minn. Const. art. XII, sec. 3. As a public corporation and agency, Sourcewell is governed by local elected municipal officials and school board members. Minn. Stat. § 123A.21 Subd. 4 (2017). Under its enabling statute, Sourcewell is explicitly authorized to provide cooperative purchasing services to eligible members. Id. at Subd. 7(23).
Sourcewell follows the competitive contracting law process to solicit, evaluate and award cooperative purchasing contracts for goods and services. Sourcewell cooperative purchasing contracts are made available through the joint exercise of powers law to member agencies. Minn. Stat. § 471.59 (2017). Membership in Sourcewell is available for all eligible state and local governments, education, higher education and nonprofit entities across North America. § 123A.21 at Subd. 3.
Disclaimer:
The information found on the Sourcewell website is provided for educational and informational purposes only. This information contained on the Sourcewell website, including any printed material derived from the website, is not legal advice and no attorney-client or other contractual relationship is formed by access to this information. Information here may be out of date, obsolete, or otherwise inaccurate.
Please consult with a qualified attorney regarding any questions.
Information current as of: 2024-07-01
202 12th Street NE | P.O. Box 219 | Staples, MN 56479 888-894-1930 | www.sourcewell-mn.gov Meeting Date: 10/15/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # VII.A.2
377367.1
CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
Lakeport Redevelopment Successor Agency
Lakeport Industrial Development Agency
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport
STAFF REPORT
RE: Adopt a Resolution in Support of California Proposition 36, The Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act MEETING DATE: 10/15/2024
SUBMITTED BY: Dale Stoebe, Chief of Police
PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD: The City Council is being asked to adopt a Resolution in Support of Proposition 36, the Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act of 2024.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: When California adopted the well-meaning Proposition 47 in 2014, one of the unintended consequences was that California lost a key tool that promoted treatment. That’s why reforming Proposition 47 is so vitally important.
Since Proposition 47’s passage, participation in drug courts has plummeted, and both overdose deaths and homelessness have risen sharply. These tragedies are occurring in part because judges no longer have the leverage needed to compel the unwilling severely addicted and those with debilitating behavioral health conditions to enroll in and stay in treatment.
Proposition 47 assumed that shifting funding from jails to drug treatment options would increase utilization of that treatment. Tragically, the opposite has occurred by removing any consequences for those who fail to pursue and/or complete the help they need.
Right now, across California we have small businesses living under constant threat while consumers pay higher prices for what is essentially a “theft tax.” Proposition 36 brings back basic common sense by requiring that those guilty of multiple convictions for drug charges (three or more convictions) enter treatment or face the consequences and giving judges the latitude to require those found guilty of multiple thefts for feeding their drug habits to seek treatment or other proven diversion programs.
Proposition 36 is NOT about going back to an era of mass incarceration. This is about creating a new era of mass treatment for the underlying conditions fueling so many thefts and driving so many people into homelessness.
Prosecution continues to possess in the prosecutorial arsenal 17(b) motions to reclassify felony convictions as misdemeanors, and both Drug and Mental Health Court diversionary programs for those willing to participate.
Many of our unhoused residents are suffering from untreated drug addiction that began or significantly worsened due to the harsh reality of life on our streets. Rather than simply ignore it – let’s confront and change this reality. Proposition 36 represents a tool to help us address the crisis of homelessness because people who Meeting Date: 10/15/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item # VII.A.2
377367.1
receive treatment have a much greater chance of staying housed. This is not about criminalizing homelessness.
It is about breaking the cycle of addiction and crime that are feeding each other.
Most Californians remember that we adopted Proposition 47 in 2014 hoping to end the era of mass incarceration. Proposition 47 has helped lower our prison population. Since the enactment of Proposition 47 in 2014, jail and prison populations have dropped 30%, but impact on crime has been limited. However, one key element of Proposition 47 reduced penalties for retail theft: single thefts under $950 are not classified as felonies – even if an individual or organized group is stealing $950 from multiple stores in one day or even stealing under $950 from different locations every day. Right now, an individual can steal $950 every day, multiple times in a day, 365 days a year, and never face any real consequences.
Common sense and compassionate reforms to Prop 47 will not only save businesses large and small – they will save lives. We have too many people suffering on our streets today – stealing to stay alive and to support their drug addictions. It is neither wise nor compassionate, and certainly not progressive in any sense, to offer these people no hope when we could help save them when they often won’t save themselves – and improve our communities at the same time – by making sure they receive the treatment they need and deserve.
Proposition 36 on our November ballot will allow a judge to charge a third hard-drug possession conviction as a treatment-mandated felony. The offender would be assigned an addiction specialist, receive access to shelter and job training, and have the offense expunged upon successful completion of a treatment program.
Proposition 36 would also add fentanyl to the list of hard drugs resulting in felony prison time for drug dealers when in possession of large quantities or firearms and give judges the ability to sentence require retail theft offenders to seek treatment or enter proven diversion programs.
The last thing we want to do is go back to the era of mass incarceration. But that’s not what Proposition 36 does.
Together we can help end the suffering we see around us every day and usher in a new era of mass treatment for those who need it the most. Proposition 36 has been endorsed by the California League of Cities, California District Attorneys’ Association, United Latinos Action, Crime Victims United, California State Association of Counties, California Police Chiefs’ Association, and Mayors and Council Members from both sides of the aisle up and down the State, to name only a few.
As a Law Enforcement leader in our community, I support and recommend that this City Council move forward in adopting the presented Resolution in Support of Proposition 36.
OPTIONS:
1. Adopt Resolution in Support of Proposition 36
2. Do not adopt Resolution
3. Provide alternative direction to staff
FISCAL IMPACT:
None Budgeted Item? Yes No
Budget Adjustment Needed? Yes No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): General Fund Water OM Fund Sewer OM Fund Other:
Comments:
Meeting Date: 10/15/2024 Page 3 Agenda Item # VII.A.2
377367.1
COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☒ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☐ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☐ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☐ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☒ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move to adopt the Resolution in Support of Proposition 36, The Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act of 2024
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution in Support of Prop 36
2. Prop 36 Comparison Chart
Resolution No. _____ (2024) Page 1
377368.1
RESOLUTION NO. (2024)
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 36, THE HOMELESSNESS, DRUG
ADDICTION, AND THEFT REDUCTION ACT
WHEREAS, while Proposition (Prop) 47 (2014) achieved notable success in making California’s criminal justice system more equitable, Prop 47 has also led to unintended consequences over the past decade; and
WHEREAS, Prop 47 has contributed to increases in repeat and often organized retail theft, the shuttering of local businesses, and difficulty convincing people to seek drug and mental health treatment; and
WHEREAS, these unintended consequences can only be corrected by the voters at the ballot box with modest amendments to Prop 47; and
WHEREAS, Prop 36, the Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act is a bipartisan measure that provides common sense, targeted reforms to Prop 47 that, with the recently adopted legislative Retail Theft Package, provide more tools to increase safety in our communities; and
WHEREAS, breaking the cycle of repeat offenders means addressing the many root causes of retail theft; and
WHEREAS, Prop 36, the Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act allows critical behavioral health services, drug treatment, and job training within our justice system for people who are homeless and suffering from mental illness or struggling with substance abuse; and
WHEREAS, it is time for meaningful and tailored reforms to our justice system to ensure the safety of our communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lakeport as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. That the City of Lakeport hereby formally expresses support for Prop 36, the Homelessness, Drug Addiction, and Theft Reduction Act and the benefit that it provides for our community’s safety.
SECTION 3. The adoption of this resolution is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be Resolution No. _____ (2024) Page 2
377368.1
seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of this resolution may have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED at a regular meeting on this 15th day of October, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
________________________________
MICHAEL FROIO, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
KELLY BUENDIA, City Clerk
Retail Theft Package
and Proposition 36
Recently, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a 10-bill package addressing retail theft. The table below compares Proposition 36 — the ballot initiative sponsored by the District Attorneys that would make changes to Proposition 47 — with the retail theft package signed by the Governor.
PROVISION PROPOSITION 36 LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE
(NO AMENDMENTS TO
PROPOSITION 47)
RELEVANT BILL
NUMBERS
Fentanyl
Fentanyl
possession with
firearm
Adds to list of
crimes with
penalties of 2, 3, or
4 years in prison.
Not in package.
Fentanyl
increasing
penalties
Increases penalties
from 2 to 20 years
depending on the
amount.
Not in package.
Treatment
mandated
felony
Creates a new
crime for hard drug
possession with
tiered penalties up
to 25 years.
Not in package.
Retail Theft
Aggregation Provides that any
case involving one
or more acts of
theft or shoplifting
may be
aggregated into a
single count or
charge.
Not in package.
Auto theft Does not address
this issue.
Closes the loophole
under existing law
regarding locked cars.
SB 905 (Wiener)
Cargo theft Does not address
this issue.
Adds cargo theft to the
Regional Property Crime
Task Force operated by
the CHP.
AB 1972 (Alanis)
Fencing Does not address
this issue.
Expands existing law for
online marketplaces to
report high-volume sellers
to law enforcement.
SB 1144 (Skinner)
Fires Does not address
this issue.
Makes it a factor in
aggravation if an offense
SB 1242 (Min)
PROVISION PROPOSITION 36 LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE
(NO AMENDMENTS TO
PROPOSITION 47)
RELEVANT BILL
NUMBERS
was carried out in a
merchant’s premises to
commit retail theft.
Increased
penalties
Increases penalty
enhancements for
property crimes for
up to 4 years and
allows the court to
impose
enhancements
with another single
count.
Increases penalty
enhancements for resale
of property or stolen
property in the
commission of a felony for
up to 4 years and allows
the court to impose
enhancements with
another single count. No
changes to Proposition
47. AB 1960 (Rivas)*;
SB 1416
(Newman)
Multijurisdictional
offenses
Does not address
this issue.
Allows local jurisdictions to
file charges that deal with
offenses across county
lines.
AB 1779 (Irwin)
Organized retail
theft
Several provisions
related to acting in
concert and
increasing
penalties for
organized retail
theft. However, it
does not address
the sunset date of
the statute. (Does
not amend the
same code section
as the legislative
bills).
Removes the sunset
clause on the organized
retail theft statute.
AB 1802 (JonesSawyer);
SB 982 (Wahab)
Police ability to
arrest
Does not address
this issue.
Provides that under
certain circumstances
police can arrest without
a warrant.
AB 2943 (Zbur)
Probation Does not address
this issue.
Provides that the term of
probation for shoplifting
or petty theft would be
two years.
AB 2943 (Zbur)
Repeat
offenders
An offender with
two prior
convictions of
petty theft or
shoplifting can be
Creates a new crime for
shoplifting which can be
charged as a felony but
does not change the
threshold amount of $950.
AB 2943 (Zbur)
PROVISION PROPOSITION 36 LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE
(NO AMENDMENTS TO
PROPOSITION 47)
RELEVANT BILL
NUMBERS
charged with a
felony regardless of
value. Amends
Proposition 47.
Restraining
orders
Does not address
this issue.
Creates the Retail Theft
Restraining Order for
repeated attempts of
shoplifting which can be
requested by city
attorneys, retailers, or
district attorneys.
AB 3209
(Berman)
Retailers –
nuisance
action
Does not address
this issue.
Prohibits local
government and law
enforcement from
threatening or filing
nuisance complaints
against retailers for
reporting crime.
AB 2943 (Zbur)
*AB 1960 (Rivas) is currently pending on the Governor’s desk.
Meeting Date: 10/15/2024 Page 1 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
CITY OF LAKEPORT
City Council ☒
City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District ☐
Lakeport Industrial Development Authority ☐
Municipal Financing Agency of Lakeport ☐
STAFF REPORT
RE: Designation of Marked Crosswalks MEETING DATE: 10/15/2024 SUBMITTED BY: Ron Ladd, Public Works Director
PURPOSE OF REPORT: ☐Information only ☐ Discussion ☒Action Item WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:
The City Council is being asked to adopt the proposed resolution designating marked crosswalks at various locations throughout the City of Lakeport.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The City of Lakeport has been reviewing its pedestrian safety infrastructure, specifically focusing on crosswalks. This review was prompted by several upcoming paving projects that include restriping efforts. As part of these paving projects, a number of crosswalks will be repainted to improve visibility and safety. A comprehensive inventory was conducted to assess the condition of existing crosswalks, identify new areas requiring pedestrian crossings, and categorize the crosswalks by type (white and yellow).
This resolution includes the addition of new crosswalks and updates to existing ones. The designated crosswalks include school zone crosswalks (yellow) and standard pedestrian crosswalks (white). In total, 113 crosswalks have been identified across the city, providing improved pedestrian safety in high-traffic areas and school zones.
1. Categorization by Color: Crosswalks located in school zones have been assigned the color yellow for greater visibility, while the remainder have been marked as white.
2. Updated Locations: Some crosswalk locations have been revised for clarity and to better align with safety needs.
3. Upcoming Repainting Projects: As part of ongoing paving projects, the following crosswalks are scheduled for restriping:
1. South Main St. at North Side of Lakeport Blvd.
2. South Main St. at South Side of Helena
3. South Main St. at South Side of Oak Knoll
4. South Main St. at South Side of C St.
5. South Main St. at the North Side of C St.
6. C St. at East Side of South Main St.
Meeting Date: 10/15/2024 Page 2 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
7. C St. at West Side of South Main St.
8. South Main St. at South Side of D St.
9. South Main St. at North Side of Martin St.
10. South Main St. at South Side of Martin St.
11. Martin St. at East Side of South Main St.
12. Martin St. at West Side of South Main St.
13. Green St. at North Side of Lakeshore Blvd.
14. Armstrong St. at East Side of South Main St.
15. Armstrong St. at West Side of South Main St.
16. South Main St. at North Side of Armstrong St.
17. South Main St. at South Side of Armstrong St.
18. Lakeport Blvd. at East Side of Larrecou Ln.
19. Lakeport Blvd. at West Side of Larrecou Ln.
20. Larrecou Ln. at the North Side of Lakeport Blvd.
21. Larrecou Ln. at Entrance to Courthouse
OPTIONS:
Approve the Resolution: The City Council can approve Resolution No. [Insert Number] as presented, thereby designating crosswalks throughout the City of Lakeport.
Modify the Resolution: The City Council may propose changes or modifications to the crosswalk designations
Deny the Resolution: And provide direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
☒ None ☐ Budgeted Item? ☐Yes ☐ No
Budget Adjustment Needed? ☐Yes ☒ No If yes, amount of appropriation increase: $ Affected fund(s): ☒ General Fund ☐ Water OM Fund ☐ Sewer OM Fund ☐ Other:
Comments:
COUNCIL PRIORITIES:
☐ Priority #1: Public Safety & Crisis Response
☐ Priority #2: Disaster Resiliency
☐ Priority #3: Good Governance & Fiscal Stability
☒ Priority #4: Capital Infrastructure Improvement
☒ Priority #5: Safe, Sustainable & Attractive Neighborhoods ☐ Priority #6: Economic Development
Meeting Date: 10/15/2024 Page 3 Agenda Item # VII.B.1.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
Move to adopt the proposed resolution designating marked crosswalks at various locations throughout the City of Lakeport
☒ Attachments: 1. Resolution
376901.1
RESOLUTION NO. XXX___ ( 2024 )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT
DESIGNATING MARKED CROSSWALKS
WHEREAS, Vehicle Code section 21106 authorizes the City Council to establish crosswalks between intersections by resolution; and
WHEREAS, Section 10.28.010 of the Lakeport Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to, by resolution, designate the locations of marked crosswalks based on accepted practices for pedestrian or other crossings; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII, Section 1 of Ordinance No. 356 (1958), marked crosswalks are to be designated at various locations in the City of Lakeport to promote pedestrian safety; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Lakeport previously adopted resolutions designating crosswalks, most recently on August 17, 2010; and
WHEREAS, a comprehensive review and assessment of crosswalks were conducted in 2024, identifying new crosswalks and updating existing ones to ensure compliance with safety standards and meet the community's needs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to designate the location of marked crosswalks at specified locations in the City based on accepted practices for safe pedestrian crosswalks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeport as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are each true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lakeport hereby establishes crosswalks, to be designated with white markings, at the following locations:
1. 1st St. at East Side Of South Main St.
2. 1st St. at West Side Of South Main St.
3. 2nd St. at East Side Of North Forbes St.
4. 2nd St. at East Side Of North Main St.
5. 2nd St. at West Side Of North Forbes St.
6. 2nd St. at West Side Of North Main St.
7. 2nd St. at West Side Of Park St.
376901.1
8. 3rd St. at East Side Of North Forbes St.
9. 3rd St. at East Side Of North Main St.
10. 3rd St. at West Side Of North Forbes St.
11. 3rd St. at West Side Of North Main St.
12. 3rd St. at West Side Of Park St.
13. 4th St. at East Side Of North Main St.
14. 4th St. at West Side Of North Main St.
15. 5th St. at East Side Of North Main St.
16. 5th St. at West Side Of North Main St.
17. 6th St. at East Side Of North Forbes St.
18. 6th St. at West Side Of North Forbes St.
19. 6th St. at West Side Of North Main St.
20. Armstrong St. at East Side Of South Main St.
21. Armstrong St. at West Side Of South Main St.
22. Bevins Ct. at East Side Of Bevins Dr.
23. Bevins St. at North Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
24. Bevins St. at South Side Of Martin St.
25. C St. at East Side Of South Main St.
26. C St. at West Side Of South Main St.
27. Charlie Jolin Way at West Side Of Parallel Dr.
28. Clear Lake Ave. at East Side Of North Main St.
29. Eleventh St. at West Side Of North High St.
30. Eleventh St. at West Side Of North Main St.
31. Eleventh St. at West Side Of Pool St.
32. Eleventh St. at Entrance To Willow Tree Plaza
33. Eleventh St. at East Side Of Mellor
34. Forbes St. at North Side Of 10Th St.
35. Forbes St. at North Side Of 2nd St.
36. Forbes St. at North Side Of 3rd St.
37. Forbes St. at North Side Of 6th St.
38. Forbes St. at North Side Of 9Th St.
39. Forbes St. at South Side Of 10Th St.
40. Forbes St. at South Side Of 2nd St.
41. Forbes St. at South Side Of 3rd St.
42. Forbes St. at South Side Of 6Th St.
43. Green St. at North Side Of Lakeshore Blvd.
44. Lakeport Blvd. at East Side Of Larrecou Ln.
45. Lakeport Blvd. at East Side Of Parallel Dr.
46. Lakeport Blvd. at West Side Of Forbes St.
47. Lakeport Blvd. at West Side Of Larrecou Ln.
48. Lakeport Blvd. at West Side Of South Main St.
49. Lakeport Blvd. at West Side Of Parallel Dr.
50. Larrecou Ln. at Entrance To Courthouse
51. Larrecou Ln. at North Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
52. Martin St. at East Side Of South Main St.
53. Martin St. at East Side Of Starr St.
376901.1
54. Martin St. at West Side Of South Main St.
55. North Forbes St. at North Side Of 10Th St.
56. North Forbes St. at North Side Of 2Nd St.
57. North Forbes St. at North Side Of 3Rd St.
58. North Forbes St. at North Side Of 6Th St.
59. North Forbes St. at North Side Of 9Th St.
60. North Forbes St. at South Side Of 10Th St.
61. North Forbes St. at South Side Of 2Nd St.
62. North Forbes St. at South Side Of 3Rd St.
63. North Forbes St. at South Side Of 6Th St.
64. North High St. at North Side Of 16Th St.
65. North High St. at South Side Of Via Del Lago St.
66. North Main St. at North Side Of 1St St.
67. North Main St. at North Side Of 2Nd St.
68. North Main St. at North Side Of 3Rd St.
69. North Main St. at North Side Of 4Th St.
70. North Main St. at North Side Of 5Th St.
71. North Main St. at North Side Of 6Th St.
72. North Main St. at North Side Of 7Th St.
73. North Main St. at North Side Of Clear Lake Ave.
74. North Main St. at South Side Of 2Nd St.
75. North Main St. at South Side Of 3Rd St.
76. North Main St. at South Side Of 4Th St.
77. North Main St. at South Side Of 5Th St.
78. North Main St. at South Side Of 6Th St.
79. Parallel Dr. at North Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
80. Parallel Dr. at South Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
81. Park St. at North Side Of 2nd St.
82. Park St. at South Side Of 2nd St.
83. Park St. at South Side Of 3rd St.
84. Peckham Ct. at West Side Of South Main St.
85. Peckham Ct. at West Side Of South Main St.
86. S Bound Off Ramp From Hwy 29 at North Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
87. Smith St. at South Side Of Martin St.
88. South Main St. at Clearlake Mobile Home Park
89. South Main St. at Mid Block Between Kimberly Ln & Royale
90. South Main St. at North Side Of Armstrong St.
91. South Main St. at North Side Of C St.
92. South Main St. at North Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
93. South Main St. at North Side Of Lupyoma Heights
94. South Main St. at North Side Of Martin St.
95. South Main St. at South Side Of Armstrong St.
96. South Main St. at South Side Of C St.
97. South Main St. at South Side Of D St.
98. South Main St. at South Side Of Helena
99. South Main St. at South Side Of Lakeport Blvd.
376901.1
100.South Main St. at South Side Of Martin St.
101.South Main St. at South Side Of Oak Knoll
102.South Main St. at South Side Of 1St St.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Lakeport hereby establishes crosswalks, to be designated with yellow markings, at the following locations:
1. 20Th St. at West Side Of Hartley St.
2. Anastasia Dr. at West Side Of Hartley St.
3. Forbes St. at North Side Of D St.
4. Forbes St. at South Side Of C St.
5. Giselman St. at School Entrance
6. Giselman St. at South Side Of Lange St.
7. Hartley St. at North Side Of 20Th St.
8. Hartley St. at South Side Of Anastasia Dr.
9. Jerry Dr. at West Side Of Hartley St.
10. Lange St. at East Side Of Giselman St.
11. Lange St. at West Side Of Giselman St.
SECTION 4. This resolution supersedes any prior resolution pertaining to the City’s designation of crosswalk locations.
SECTION 5. This resolution is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the designation of crosswalks may have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 6. This resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lakeport held on the on the 15th day of October 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
_______________________________
Michael Froio, Mayor
City of Lakeport
ATTEST:
376901.1
_________________________________
Kelly Buendia, City Clerk
City of Lakeport