Lancaster City Council
June 13, 2023

GENERAL INFORMATION
Table 1 summarizes the general information concerning this project.

Table 1: General Information

ITEM DESCRIPTION
APN 3126-031-901, 3126-031-902
LOCATION ±20 acres located at 431 East Avenue K-4
The subject property is zoned SP 80-02 with a land use
designation of Specific Plan/Light Industrial.ZONING AND LAND USE North: Vacant (former driving range) and single family
residential subdivision; SP 80-02, R-7,000
South: Industrial buildings with a variety of commercial and industrial uses; SP 80-02
East: Single family residences, small retail center and vacant land; R-7,000, Commercial (C)

SURROUNDING LAND

USES AND ZONING
West: Multi-family residential complex and
commercial/industrial buildings; SP 80-02
The project site is partially developed with the existing research and development facility (existing buildings, tower, and solar field). The remainder of the site is vacant as it was formerly part of the golf center driving range.

CURRENT

DEVELOPMENT
An initial study (SCH #2023020184) was prepared for the proposed project and circulated for a 30-day public review period in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). The public review period started on February 7, 2023 and ended on March 9, 2023.

ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW
Effective January 1, 1991, applicants whose projects have the potential to result in the loss of fish, wildlife or habitat through urbanization and/or land use conversion are required to pay filing fees as set forth under Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Pursuant to Section 21089(b) of the Public
Resources Code, the approval of a project is not valid, and no development right is vested, until such fees are paid.

PC Staff Report
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The proposed project consists of the expansion of the existing Heliogen Research & Development facility at 431 East Avenue K-4 to include additional testing operations; commercial hydrogen production would not occur on the project site. Specifically, the project would include expanding the uses at the project site to include the following:
• Hydrogen production, processing, storing, and dispensing; • Electricity production using a photovoltaic field; and • Synthetic fuel production and storage.

In order to support this additional research and development, the following equipment would be installed at the southern end of the subject property as shown in the Site Plan. • An additional 55-foot tower and receiver;
• 100 kilowatt (kW) photovoltaic solar field (approximately 400 panels); • Stationary electrolyzer cell power system (used for hydrogen production) comprised of a telemetry cabinet and four modules: 1) power module; 2) generation module; 3) rectifier module; and 4) steam flow module;
• Six 300 cubic foot (volume) hydrogen gas cylinders;
• Hydrogen transfer line
• Hydrogen compression/storage/dispensing unit;
• Thermal reactor for synthetic fuel production; and
• Fischer Tropsch reactor for synthetic fuel production.

Tower
A 55-foot tower would be installed on the project site adjacent to the existing on-site tower. The tower would support the expanded R&D uses on the site and would be similar in appearance to the existing tower.

Photovoltaic Solar Field
Approximately 400 photovoltaic (PV) solar panels would be integrated into the existing heliostat fields to generate 100 kW of power. The purpose of the PV solar panels is to test various PV components, including storage, panels, frames, etc., for solar thermal application.

Hydrogen Production, Processing, Storage, and Dispensing Hydrogen production capabilities would be tested at the project site including storage (compressed/solid state), water capture, power generation from hydrogen, and hydrogen venting/dispensing. Hydrogen production would take place using a stationary electrolyzer cell power system energized by the concentrated solar power (CSP) produced from the solar field as

PC Staff Report
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

well as grid power. Once the hydrogen is produced, it would be 1) used for production of synthetic fuels, or 2) transferred via a hydrogen transfer line into the compression/storage unit. This storage unit would consist of a hydrogen drying unit and compression and/or solid-state storage system.

Approximately 500 kg of hydrogen would be produced a day, and the storage unit volume would be approximately 1,000 kg of hydrogen. Hydrogen venting/dispensing would occur onsite consistent with federal, state, and local regulations. Hydrogen produced on site would be for project use only and not available to the public.

Synthetic Fuel Production and Storage
Synthetic crude would be produced using the process described in the initial study. The hydrocarbon crude would not be refined at the project site and would be sent off-site for further refinement. Approximately 20-40 gallons of crude would be produced per day at the project site.

The materials would all be generated, tested, and stored in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations.

Project Construction
Project construction would occur over a 3-month period working 5 days per week, 8 hours per day.

A total of 12 construction workers would be required. No demolition and minimal, if any grading, would occur.

ANALYSIS:

General Plan Consistency
The CUP was analyzed for consistency with the City of Lancaster General Plan 2030. The proposed facility would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan/Light Industrial (LI) and the types of uses envisioned therein. The LI land use designation envisions “clean, non-polluting industrial and office uses with support commercial. Maximum floor area ratios of 0.5” (General Plan Objective 17.1). The proposed use is consistent with the following Goals and Actions of the General Plan:

Policy 3.1.1: Ensure that development does not adversely affect the groundwater basin.

Objective 3.3: Preserve acceptable air quality by striving to attain and maintain national, state, and local air quality standards.

Policy 3.3.1:

Policy 3.3.3:

Minimize the amount of vehicular miles traveled.

Minimize air pollutant emissions generated by new and existing development.

Policy 3.3.4: Protect sensitive uses such as homes, schools, and medical facilities from the impacts of air pollution.

PC Staff Report
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

Policy 3.3.5:

Policy 3.4.4:

Cooperate with the AVAQMD and other agencies to protect air quality in the Antelope Valley.

Ensure that development proposals, including City sponsored projects, are analyzed for short- and long-term impacts to biological resources and that appropriate mitigation measures are
implemented.

Policy 3.5.1:

Policy 3.6.1:

Minimize erosion problems resulting from development activities.

Reduce energy consumption by establishing land use patterns which would decrease automobile travel and increase the use of energy efficient modes of transportation.

Policy 3.6.4:

Policy 3.6.6:

Support state and federal legislation that would eliminate wasteful energy consumption in an appropriate manner.

Consider and promote the use of alternative energy such as wind energy and solar energy. (Note: Policy 15.2.1 considers the use of waste to energy cogeneration systems as an energy source.) Policy 4.3.2:

Policy 4.5.1:

Whenever feasible, manage the generation of single even noise levels (SENL) from motor vehicles, trains, aircraft, commercial, industrial, construction and other activities such that SENL levels are no greater than 15 dBA above the noise objectives included in the Plan for Public Health and Safety.

Ensure that activities within the City of Lancaster transport, use, store and dispose of hazardous materials in a responsible manner which protects the public health and safety.

Policy 4.7.2:

Goal 16:

Ensure that the design of new development minimizes the potential for fire.

To promote economic self-sufficiency and a fiscally solvent and financially stable community.

Policy 16.1.1: Promote a jobs/housing balance that places an emphasis on the attraction of high-paying jobs which will enable the local workforce to achieve the standard of living necessary to both live and work within the community.

Policy 16.6.1: Require new development to construct and/or pay for new on-site capital improvements necessitated by their project, consistent with performance criteria identified in Objective 15.1.

PC Staff Report
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

Goal 17: To establish a variety of land uses, which serve to develop Lancaster into a balanced and complete community in which people live, work, shop and play.

Specific Action 17.1.1(a): Through the development review process, ensure that all proposed development is consistent with the General Plan text, land use map, and the intensity standards outlined in Table VIII-1.

The proposed use could not conflict with any of applicable policies within the General Plan and would help to further the City’s alternative energy goals. While the expansion of the R&D facility would not create any permanent jobs at this time, the technology being tested ultimately will result in further development and technical jobs in an industry that is not currently present in the Antelope Valley. The facility is appropriately located within the SP 80-02 zone which encourages these types of uses.

Compliance with the Lancaster Business Park Specific Plan The project site is located within the boundaries of Phase I and Phase II of the Lancaster Business Park Specific Plan (SP 80-02). Originally, the site was designated for a recreational use and was developed with the City of Lancaster’s Golf Center and Driving Range. This facility went out of use several years ago and the property was subsequently leased to the applicant for research and development activities associated with alternative energy in 2019. This is consistent with the underlying zoning of Light Industrial (LI) for the properties included in the Specific Plan. As such, the proposed project is consistent with the Specific Plan.

Compliance with the Lancaster Municipal Code (LMC)
The proposed expansion of the existing research and development facility is consistent with the requirements of the Lancaster Business Park Specific Plan, Phase I and II (SP 80-02) and the development standards of the LI zone.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
In order to grant a CUP, Section 17.32.090 of the Lancaster Municipal Code states that the Planning Commission must make all of the following findings:
a. That the proposed use will not be in substantial conflict with the adopted general plan for the area.

The CUP for the proposed hydrogen facility would be in conformance with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Specific Plan/Light Industrial (LI). In addition, the proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and specific actions identified within the General Plan.

PC Staff Report
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

b. That the requested use at the location proposed will not:

1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area.

The proposed project is for the expansion of an existing research and development facility for alternative energy (solar/hydrogen) located at 431 East Avenue K-4. The project site is located within the boundaries of the Lancaster Business Park which encourages industrial, commercial and research/development type uses. The project site and the immediately surrounding area is zoned as SP 80-02. There is a multi-family residential development located immediately adjacent to the project site on the northeast and single family residential uses are located to the east and north across 5 th Street East and Avenue K from the project site. The property to the north and east is zoned R-7,000 with some Commercial zoning on the southeast corner of 5th Street East and Avenue K. The other uses near the site are commercial and industrial in nature. As designed, the proposed project would not adversely affect the health, peace, comfort, or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area.

2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site.

The expansion of the existing research and development facility would occur on a portion of the property located at 431 East Avenue K-4 in the Lancaster Business Park Specific Plan. The proposed use is compatible with the other uses in the Lancaster Business Park Specific Plan and the residential/commercial uses to the east and north of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of other property.

3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare.

The proposed expansion of the existing research and development facility would not jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare of the public or surrounding community. In addition to compliance with all regulations pertaining to hazardous materials, mitigation measures have been identified to reduce impacts to air quality, geology and soils, hazards/hazardous materials, and noise to less than significant levels.
c. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this title, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in the surrounding area.

The proposed facility is of adequate size and shape to meet all of the required development standards of the Light Industrial zone and Lancaster Business Park Specific Plan (SP 80-02) and would integrate with the surrounding industrial uses.

PC Staff Report
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

d. The proposed site is adequately served:

1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate.

The project site would be accessed via the existing driveway located on Avenue K-4.

Avenue K-4 connects to both 5th Street East and Division Street. These roadways have already been fully improved and can adequately handle traffic from the proposed project and the surrounding uses. A total of 12 workers would be required to install the proposed equipment for the expansion. After construction is complete, no additional employees would be required and no new trips would be generated.

2. By other public or private service facilities as are required.

The proposed site location has adequate sewer, water, fire, and police services to serve the site. No new utilities would be required to serve the property.

LEGAL NOTICE
A notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project, posted in three places, posted on the subject property, and noticed in Antelope Valley Press on March 10, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 23-05 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11 to allow for the expansion of the existing alternative energy/hydrogen research and development facility located at 431 East Avenue K-4 in the Specific Plan 80-02 (SP 80-02) zone (APNs 3126-031-901, 3126- 031-902) and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Attachments:

A. Resolution No. 23-05
B. Site Plans
C. Initial Study

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0F419146-2999-4462-B655-BCCB63FD6896 RESOLUTION NO. 23-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

OF THE CITY OF LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 22-11

TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING

HYDROGEN/ALTERNATIVE ENERGY RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITY AT 431 EAST
AVENUE K-4 IN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 80-02 ZONE
(APNS: 3126-031-901, 3126-031-902)
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit has been requested by Heliogen, Inc., to allow for the expansion of the existing hydrogen/alternative energy research and development facility in the Specific Plan (SP) 80-02 zone; and
WHEREAS, an application for the above-described Conditional Use Permit has been filed pursuant to the regulations contained in Article I of Chapter 17.32 of the Lancaster Municipal Code (“LMC”); and
WHEREAS, a notice of intention to consider the granting of a Conditional Use Permit has been given as required by Article V of Chapter 17.32 of the LMC, and Section 65905 of the Government Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, staff has performed necessary investigations, prepared a written report, and recommended approval of this conditional use application, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study (SCH #2023020184) was prepared for the proposed project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and circulated for public review ending on March 9, 2023; and
WHEREAS, public notice was provided, as required by law, and a public hearing was held on March 20, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after considering all evidence presented, desires to approved the Applicant’s requested Conditional Use Permit

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LANCASTER, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER, AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. That the Planning Commission hereby adopts the following findings pursuant to Section 17.32.090 of the LMC, in support of approving this application:
a. That the proposed use will not be in substantial conflict with the adopted general plan for the area.
b. The requested use at the location proposed will not:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0F419146-2999-4462-B655-BCCB63FD6896 PC Resolution No. 23-05
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area.

2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site.

3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare.
c. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this title, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in the surrounding area.
d. The proposed site is adequately served:

1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate.

2. By other public or private service facilities as are required.

Section 2. This Commission hereby finds the foregoing recitals are true, correct and a substantive part of this resolution.

Section 3. That the Planning Commission hereby certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the proposed project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (including its implementing regulations) prior to taking action. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Initial Study determined that the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a significant effect in this case with the implementation of the mitigation measures as detailed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

The Planning Commission hereby finds, pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the Public Resources Code, that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the proposed project reflects the independent judgement of the City of Lancaster.

Section 4. That the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Section 5. That the Community Development Division staff is hereby authorized and directed to prepare, execute and file a Notice of Determination pursuant to CEQA (including its implementing guidelines).

Section 6. This Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11, subject to the conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0F419146-2999-4462-B655-BCCB63FD6896 PC Resolution No. 23-05
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
March 20, 2023

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20 th day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Vose, Harvey, Birden, Derryberry, Tufts
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSED:

Moore and UnderwoodABSENT:

JAMES D. VOSE, Chairman
Lancaster Planning Commission
ATTEST:

Jocelyn Swain signed on behalf of Larissa De La Cruz___________________________________ LARISSA DE LA CRUZ, Director – Community Development
City of Lancaster
Attachment:

Conditions List
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

ATTACHMENT TO PC RESOLUTION NO. 23-05
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 22-11

CONDITIONS LIST
March 20, 2023

GENERAL

1. 2.

Unless otherwise indicated herein, the development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with approved site plans on file in the Community Development Division.

This Conditional Use Permit must be used within two (2) years from the date of approval; otherwise the Conditional Use Permit will expire. The applicant may, not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date, request a total of three one (1) year extensions in writing to the Community Development Manager. Modifications to the plan, including timing of on- and off-site improvements that do not raise significant new issues or extend the overall time frame beyond the approval period may be approved by the Community Development Manager.

Note: Issuance of building permits, installation of off-site improvements, and grading of the site do not constitute “use” of the Conditional Use Permit. Under the Zoning Ordinance, construction or other development authorized by the Conditional Use Permit must have commended. Generally, the City requires that the slab of a major building in the project be poured and inspected in order to consider the permit used, although the circumstances of each case may vary depending on the land use involved.

3. 4.

This Conditional Use Permit will not be effective until ten (10) working days after the date upon which it is granted approval and until the applicant has executed and returned to the Community Development Division an authorized acceptance of the conditions of approval applicable to said permit.

The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and representatives from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its elected officials, officers, employees and representatives to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City concerning this conditional use permit and the use(s) and development permitted by its approval. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense; this condition shall not be imposed if the City fails to promptly notify the applicant or fails to cooperate fully in the defense.

5. Expansion or intensification of the use beyond the approval specified herein would require subsequent review and possible application for amendment. The Community Development Manager is authorized to approve modifications to the site plan provided such modifications do not substantially change the intent of the approved use, avoid issues raised at the public hearing, or raise new issues not previously addressed.

6. 7.

If the project is developed in phases, all the development requirements shall be met for each phase including parking, landscaping, trash enclosures, drainage, etc. The developer shall provide a phasing plan and phasing condition/mitigation measure matrix to the Community Development Division for approval prior to the issuance of construction- related permits.

All requirements of the Municipal Code and the specific zoning of the subject property must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the permit or shown on the approved site plan.

8. 9.

All construction and/or installation of improvements shall be undertaken to the specification of the Lancaster Municipal Code.

The applicant shall contact the Los Angeles County Fire Department to determine the improvements that may be required to protect the property from fire hazards and shall provide and install at their expense such improvements as may be deemed necessary by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Fire protection improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director prior to certification of completion and occupancy of the subject buildings.

10. 11.

12. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Development Services Department prior to any construction, remodeling, or replacement of buildings or other structures.

An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Department prior to doing any work within the public right-of-way.

Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall pay all applicable development fees including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Los Angeles County Sanitation District Sewer Connection Fee; 2) Interim School Facilities Financing Fee; 3) Traffic Signal Fee; 4) Planned Local Drainage Facilities fee; 5) Dwelling Unit Fee; 6) Traffic Impact Fees; 7) Urban Structure Program Fee (Park Development Fee, Administrative Office Fee, Corporate Yard Fee, and Operations Impact Fee, etc.); and 8) Landscape Fee.

13. 14.

If any provision of this permit is held or declared to be invalid, the permit shall be void, and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse.

It is further declared and made a condition of this permit that if any condition hereof is violated, or if any law, statute, or ordinance is violated, the permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so within the time period set forth in the notice.

15. Prior to building/grading permit issuance, whichever comes first, the applicant shall submit a geotechnical report as detailed in Chapter 18 of the latest edition of the California Building Code and as required by the Development Services Department. The geotechnical report shall be completed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Work, Manual for Preparation of Geotechnical Reports.

16. 17.

Prior to occupancy of any buildings or structures, the permittee shall request, no less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance, that on-site inspection be made by the Community Development Division to verify that development of the property has occurred in conformity with conditions as enumerated in this permit.

The applicant shall be responsible for notifying the Community Development Division in writing of any change in ownership, designation of a new engineer, or change in the status of the developer, within thirty (30) days of said change.

FEES, ASSESSMENTS, AND ANNEXATIONS

18. 19.

Prior to recordation of the final map and/or building occupancy, the property shall be annexed into the Lancaster Drainage Maintenance District.

The applicant is hereby advised that this project is subject to 1st year’s assessment fees for the following maintenance districts, as applicable, prior to issuance of related permits (grading, building, sewer, etc.): 1) Lancaster Drainage Maintenance District, 2) Lancaster Lighting Maintenance District, and 3) Lancaster Sewer Maintenance District.

UTILITIES

20. 21.

No development shall occur on the eastern portion of the property with storm drainage structures, concrete wingwalls and headwalls.

STREETS
Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall repair or replace any broken, damaged, and/or non-ADA compliant pavement, curb, gutter, and sidewalk on streets within or abutting the project to street centerline to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.

22. 23.

The applicant shall comply with City Municipal Code, Chapter 13.20, Article II, entitled Installation/Relocation for New/Expanded Development of Overhead Utilities as directed by the Development Services Director. (Ordinance No. 361) The proposed project shall comply with the City of Lancaster Holiday Moratorium Policy.

No excavation or work shall occur within the public right-of-way on Primary Arterials, Secondary Arterials, and Collector Streets between November 15th and January 2nd, except work pertaining to public safety or with the written permission of the City Manager.

Work commenced prior to the restriction period must be in such a condition that it will be resurfaced prior to November 15th.

DRAINAGE/GRADING

24. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a grading plan consistent with the approved site plan and conditions of approval. The grading plan shall be based on an approved drainage area study and hydrology/hydraulic report, detailed recent

topographic survey, and a detailed engineering soils report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations.

25. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, show the lowest portion of electrical components on the solar structures shall be a minimum of one-foot above the maximum water level of the basin resulting from a Capital Flood (50-year) to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. Submit a letter signed and stamped by the Engineer of Record stating that they have reviewed the previously approved final hydrology/hydraulic study and that the electrical components of the solar structures will be a minimum of one- foot above the maximum water level of the basin result from a Capital Flood (50-year).

26. 27.

Prior to building occupancy, all drainage facilities are to be constructed and approved prior to occupancy of any structure within the project to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.

Prior to issuance of any construction related permits (grading, building, etc.), a Dust Control Plan shall be prepared and submitted to the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) in accordance with Rule 403 of the AVAQMD. An approved copy of the Dust Control Plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for residential projects of 10 acres and larger and for commercial/industrial projects of 5 acres and larger. In lieu of an approved plan, a letter from the AVAQMD waiving this requirement shall be submitted.

28. Prior to commencing hauling operations for this project, the applicant shall obtain a hauling permit for an import/export of > 100 CY of hauling material to/from the project within the public right-of-way including the export/receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The applicant is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the material hauling operation. The designated haul route shall be designed to the requirements of the City of Lancaster Design Guidelines, Standards, and Municipal Code and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
a. The applicant shall comply with the following requirements for the material hauling operation:
i. The hours of operation shall be approved by the Development Services Director.
ii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
iii. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
iv. When required by the Development Services Director, the applicant shall post a security to serve as surety of repair in the event facilities within the City right-of-way are adversely impacted by the hauling operations. b. Prior to building occupancy/release of security, the applicant shall repair any pavement damaged by the material hauling operation to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. The security will not be reduced or released or

building occupancy given until the completion of the repair work. The limits of the road repairs shall be consistent with the approved haul route and determined by the Development Services Director.

WATER

29. 30.

The project shall be served by adequately sized water system facilities, including fire hydrants, of sufficient size to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows required for the land division. Domestic flows required are to be determined by the Development Services Director. Fire flows required are to be determined by the Fire Chief.

There shall also be filed with this project a statement from the water purveyor indicating that water service shall be provided to each lot and that the proposed water mains and any other required facilities will be operated by the purveyor and that under normal operating conditions the system will meet requirements for the land division.

31. 32.

Per the direction of the Community Development Manager and the Development Services Director, the applicant shall be required to comply with all Ordinances in effect at the time of project construction to address the balance of water supply to water demand.

In order to obtain a conditional will-serve letter, the Project applicant must secure permanent water supply entitlements sufficient to meet the Project’s annual water demands as determined by the Los Angeles County Waterworks District 40 (District). This entitlement may be secured through entering an agreement with the District to purchase new State Water Project Table A or other permanent water supply through the Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency.

33. In addition to the condition above, the District may require that: (1) various charges/fees be paid by the owner/developer of the property; (2) on-site and off-site water system facilities be installed by a State licensed contractor retained by the owner/developer, and inspected and accepted by the District, using plans prepared by a licensed engineer that are reviewed by the District; or (3) a combination of (1) and (2). Once constructed to the satisfaction of the District, the water system facilities are to be dedicated gratis to the District for subsequent operation and maintenance.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

34. The applicant is hereby advised that the use of any signs, strings of pennants, banners or streamers, clusters of flags and similar attention-getting devices are prohibited, except where there has been prior written approval from the Community Development Division.

35. 36.

All structures on the project site shall be 35 feet or less in height with the exception of the tower which is anticipated to be 55 feet in height and shall not exceed 60 feet in height.

No outside storage is permitted on the project site.

37. 38.

Prior to certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall obtain any required AVAQMD permits for generators and other stationary equipment onsite. A copy of the permits shall be provided to the City of Lancaster.

BUILDING AND SAFETY
All electrical materials and equipment shall be new and shall be listed by Underwriter’s Laboratories (UL) and bear their label or listed and certified by a nationally recognized testing authority acceptable to the City of Lancaster. Where UL does not have a listing, custom made equipment shall be evaluated by a nationally recognized testing laboratory acceptable to the City of Lancaster and be field labeled indicating equipment is safe and suitable for the use intended. All reports shall be submitted to the City of Lancaster prior to final inspection and energizing. In addition, the materials, equipment, and installation shall comply with the requirements of the following:
• American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM)
• Insulated Power Cable Engineers Association (IPCEA)
• National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
• American Standard Association
• National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA)
• American National Standard Institute (ANSI)
• California Electric Code (CEC) – 2022
• National Electrical Safety Code – Current Edition
• Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) • All local codes having jurisdiction
Engineer of record shall periodically make site visits to verify equipment and installation is per design.

OTHER

39. In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department (YSMN) shall be contacted regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

40. If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall

develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to YSMN for review and comment. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

41. 42.

If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project.

The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department (YSMN) shall be contacted in the event any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources are discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of the project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor on-site.

43. 44.

Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to YSMN. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with YSMN throughout the life of the project.

The applicant shall pay a fee to the City of Lancaster in the sum of $770.00 per gross acre, to be held in the biological mitigation fund as established by the City Council. Payment of said fee shall occur prior to Final Map for Parcel/Tract Maps and prior to or concurrent with the approval of a grading permit for all other projects. Additionally, should the applicant be required to pay mitigation fees under the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, these fees can be deducted from the amount collected by the City of Lancaster.

45. 46.

Upon completion of construction, an Active Operation Renewable Energy Dust Control Plan, as outlined in District Rule 302 – Other Fees, shall be required by the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.

ENVIRONMENTAL/MITIGATION MEASURES
Prior to ground disturbance activities, the project operator shall provide evidence to the Development Services Director that the project operator and/or construction manager has developed a “Valley Fever Training Handout”, training, and schedule of sessions for education to be provided to all construction personnel. All evidence of the training session materials, handout(s) and schedule shall be submitted to the Development Services Director within 24 hours of the first training session. Multiple training sessions may be conducted if different work crews will come to the site for different stages of construction; however, all construction personnel shall be provided training prior to beginning work. The evidence submitted to the Development Services Director regarding the “Valley Fever Training Handout” and Session(s) shall include the following:

• A sign-in sheet (to include the printed employee names, signature, and date) for all employees who attended the training session.
• Distribution of a written flier or brochure that includes educational information regarding the health effects of exposure to criteria pollutant emissions and Valley Fever.
• Training on methods that may help prevent Valley Fever infection. • A demonstration to employees on how to use personal protective equipment, such as respiratory equipment (masks), to reduce exposure to pollutants and facilitate recognition of symptoms and earlier treatment of Valley Fever. Where respirators are required, the equipment shall be readily available and shall be provided to employees for use during work. Proof that the demonstration is included in the training shall be submitted to the county. This proof can be via printed training materials/agenda, DVD, digital media files, or photographs.

The project operator also shall consult with the Los Angeles County Public Health to develop a Valley Fever Dust Management Plan that addresses the potential presence of the Coccidioides spore and mitigates for the potential for Coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever).

Prior to issuance of permits, the project operator shall submit the Plan to the Los Angeles County Public Health for review and comment. The Plan shall include a program to evaluate the potential for exposure to Valley Fever from construction activities and to identify appropriate safety procedures that shall be implemented, as needed, to minimize personnel and public exposure to potential Coccidioides spores. Measures in the Plan shall include the following:
• Provide HEP-filters for heavy equipment equipped with factory enclosed cabs capable of accepting the filters. Cause contractors utilizing applicable heavy equipment to furnish proof of worker training on proper use of applicable heavy equipment cabs, such as turning on air conditioning prior to using the equipment. • Provide communication methods, such as two-way radios, for use in enclosed cabs. • Require National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved half-face respirators equipped with minimum N-95 protection factor for use during worker collocation with surface disturbance activities, as required per the hazard assessment process.
• Cause employees to be medically evaluated, fit-tested, and properly trained on the use of the respirators, and implement a full respiratory protection program in accordance with the applicable Cal/OSHA Respiratory Protection Standard (8 CCR 5144).
• Provide separate, clean eating areas with hand-washing facilities. • Install equipment inspection stations at each construction equipment access/egress point. Examine construction vehicles and equipment for excess soil material and clean, as necessary, before equipment is moved off-site.

• Train workers to recognize the symptoms of Valley Fever, and to promptly report suspected symptoms of work-related Valley Fever to a supervisor. • Work with a medical professional to develop a protocol to medically evaluate employees who develop symptoms of Valley Fever.
• Work with a medical professional, in consultation with the Los Angeles County Public Health, to develop an educational handout for on-site workers and surrounding residents within three miles of the project site, and include the following information on Valley Fever: what are the potential sources/ causes, what are the common symptoms, what are the options or remedies available should someone be experiencing these symptoms, and where testing for exposure is available. Prior to construction permit issuance, this handout shall have been created by the project operator and reviewed by the project operator and reviewed by the Development Services Director. No less than 30 days prior to any work commencing, this handout shall be mailed to all existing residences within a specified radius of the project boundaries as determined by the Development Services Director. The radius shall not exceed three miles and is dependent upon the location of the project site.
• When possible, position workers upwind or crosswind when digging a trench or performing other soil-disturbing tasks.
• Prohibit smoking at the worksite outside of designated smoking areas; designated smoking areas will be equipped with handwashing facilities. • Post warnings on-site and consider limiting access to visitors, especially those without adequate training and respiratory protection.
• Audit and enforce compliance with relevant Cal OSHA health and safety standards on the job site.

47. 48.

The applicant shall submit the required Construction Excavation Fee to the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) prior to the issuance of any grading and/or construction permits. This includes compliance with all prerequisites outlined in District Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, including submission and approval of a Dust Control Plan, installation of signage and the completion of a success onsite compliance inspection by an AVAQMD field inspector. Proof of compliance shall be submitted to the City.

The use, storage, and transport of hazardous materials associated with the operation of the proposed R&D facility shall be in compliance with all applicable regulations. Any necessary permits shall be obtained from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, or other applicable agency.

49. 50.

Disposal of any hazardous material shall be done in accordance with all applicable regulations and associated with an EPA HazWaste ID number issued for the project site.

Construction operations shall not occur between 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays or Saturday or at any time on Sunday. The hours of any construction-related activities shall be restricted to the periods and days permitted by local ordinance.

51. The on-site construction supervisor shall have the responsibility and authority to receive and resolve complaints. A clear appeal process to the owner shall be established prior to construction commencement that will allow for resolution of noise problems that cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor.

52. 53.

54. Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion power equipment, where feasible.

Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking and maintenance areas shall be located as far away as practicable from noise sensitive receptors.

The use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells shall be for safety warning purposes only.

55. 56.

No project-related public address or music system shall be audible at any adjacent receptor.

All noise producing construction equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, air-inlet silencers where appropriate, and other shrouds, shields, or other noise-reducing features in good operating condition that meets or exceeds original factory specifications. Mobile or fixed “package” equipment (e.g., arc- welders, air compressors, etc.) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise controls features that are readily available for the type of equipment.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCEMit.

No.

Mitigation Measure/
Conditions of Approval
Monitoring Milestone
(Frequency)
Method of
Verification
Party Responsible
for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks

AIR QUALITY
1 Prior to ground disturbance activities, the project Prior to any ground operator shall provide evidence to the Development disturbing activities.

Services Director that the project operator and/or
construction manager has developed a “Valley Fever
Training Handout”, training, and schedule of sessions
for education to be provided to all construction
personnel. All evidence of the training session
materials, handout(s) and schedule shall be submitted
to the Development Services Director within 24 hours
of the first training session. Multiple training sessions may be conducted if different work crews will come to
the site for different stages of construction; however, all construction personnel shall be provided training
prior to beginning work. The evidence submitted to the
Development Services Director regarding the “Valley
Fever Training Handout” and Session(s) shall include
the following:

A copy of all training
session materials,
handout(s), and
schedule shall be
provided to the
Development Services
Department,
Community
Development Division
(Planning)
Community
Development Division.
• A sign-in sheet (to include the printed employee
names, signature, and date) for all employees who
attended the training session.
• Distribution of a written flier or brochure that
includes educational information regarding the
health effects of exposure to criteria pollutant
emissions and Valley Fever.
• Training on methods that may help prevent Valley
Fever infection.
• A demonstration to employees on how to use
personal protective equipment, such as respiratory
equipment (masks), to reduce exposure to
pollutants and facilitate recognition of symptoms

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCEMit.

No.

Mitigation Measure/
Conditions of Approval
Monitoring Milestone
(Frequency)
Method of
Verification
Party Responsible
for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
and earlier treatment of Valley Fever. Where
respirators are required, the equipment shall be
readily available and shall be provided to
employees for use during work. Proof that the
demonstration is included in the training shall be
submitted to the county. This proof can be via
printed training materials/agenda, DVD, digital
media files, or photographs.

The project operator also shall consult with the Los
Angeles County Public Health to develop a Valley
Fever Dust Management Plan that addresses the
potential presence of the Coccidioides spore and
mitigates for the potential for Coccidioidomycosis
(Valley Fever). Prior to issuance of permits, the project operator shall submit the Plan to the Los Angeles
County Public Health for review and comment. The
Plan shall include a program to evaluate the potential
for exposure to Valley Fever from construction
activities and to identify appropriate safety procedures that shall be implemented, as needed, to minimize
personnel and public exposure to potential
Coccidioides spores. Measures in the Plan shall
include the following:
• Provide HEP-filters for heavy equipment equipped
with factory enclosed cabs capable of accepting the
filters. Cause contractors utilizing applicable heavy
equipment to furnish proof of worker training on
proper use of applicable heavy equipment cabs,
such as turning on air conditioning prior to using the
equipment.
• Provide communication methods, such as two-way
radios, for use in enclosed cabs.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCEMit.

No.

Mitigation Measure/
Conditions of Approval
Monitoring Milestone
(Frequency)
Method of
Verification
Party Responsible
for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
• Require National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH)-approved half-face respirators
equipped with minimum N-95 protection factor for
use during worker collocation with surface
disturbance activities, as required per the hazard
assessment process.
• Cause employees to be medically evaluated, fit-
tested, and properly trained on the use of the
respirators, and implement a full respiratory
protection program in accordance with the
applicable Cal/OSHA Respiratory Protection
Standard (8 CCR 5144).
• Provide separate, clean eating areas with hand-
washing facilities.
• Install equipment inspection stations at each
construction equipment access/egress point.

Examine construction vehicles and equipment for
excess soil material and clean, as necessary,
before equipment is moved off-site.
• Train workers to recognize the symptoms of Valley
Fever, and to promptly report suspected symptoms
of work-related Valley Fever to a supervisor.
• Work with a medical professional to develop a
protocol to medically evaluate employees who
develop symptoms of Valley Fever.
• Work with a medical professional, in consultation
with the Los Angeles County Public Health, to
develop an educational handout for on-site workers
and surrounding residents within three miles of the
project site, and include the following information on

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCEMit.

No.

Mitigation Measure/
Conditions of Approval
Monitoring Milestone
(Frequency)
Method of
Verification
Party Responsible
for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
Valley Fever: what are the potential sources/
causes, what are the common symptoms, what are
the options or remedies available should someone
be experiencing these symptoms, and where
testing for exposure is available. Prior to
construction permit issuance, this handout shall
have been created by the project operator and
reviewed by the project operator and reviewed by
the Development Services Director. No less than 30
days prior to any work commencing, this handout
shall be mailed to all existing residences within a
specified radius of the project boundaries as
determined by the Development Services Director.

The radius shall not exceed three miles and is
dependent upon the location of the project site.
• When possible, position workers upwind or
crosswind when digging a trench or performing
other soil-disturbing tasks.
• Prohibit smoking at the worksite outside of
designated smoking areas; designated smoking
areas will be equipped with handwashing facilities.
• Post warnings on-site and consider limiting access
to visitors, especially those without adequate
training and respiratory protection.
• Audit and enforce compliance with relevant Cal
OSHA health and safety standards on the job site.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
2 The applicant shall submit the required Construction Prior to issuance of Excavation Fee to the Antelope Valley Air Quality grading and/or Management District (AVAQMD) prior to the issuance construction permits. of any grading and/or construction permits. This
The applicant shall
submit a Dust Control
Plan to the Antelope
Valley Air Quality
Antelope Valley Air
Quality Management
District and
Development Services

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCEMit.

No.

Mitigation Measure/
Conditions of Approval
Monitoring Milestone
(Frequency)
Method of
Verification
Party Responsible
for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
includes compliance with all prerequisites outlined in
District Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, including submission
and approval of a Dust Control Plan, installation of
signage and the completion of a successful onsite
compliance inspection by an AVAQMD field inspector.

Proof of compliance shall be submitted to the City.

Management District.

The approved plan
shall be submitted to
the City of Lancaster.

Department,
Community
Development Division
(Planning)

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
3 The use, storage, and transport of hazardous During operation. A copy of any Development Services materials associated with the operation of the
proposed R&D facility shall be in compliance with all
applicable regulations. Any necessary permits shall be
obtained from the Los Angeles County Fire
Department, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management
District, or other applicable agency.
applicable permits shall Department,
be available upon
request.

Community
Development Division
(Planning)
4 Disposal of any hazardous material shall be done in During construction and The applicant shall Development Services Department,
Community
Development Division
(Planning)
accordance with all applicable regulations and operation associated with an EPA HazWaste ID number issued
for the project site.
provide the City of
Lancaster copies of
any manifests upon
request.

NOISE
5 Construction operations shall not occur between 8 During construction. p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays or Saturday or at any
time on Sunday. The hours of any construction-related
activities shall be restricted to the periods and days
permitted by local ordinance.

Field Inspection. Development Services
Department, Building
and Safety
6 The on-site construction supervisor shall have the Prior to construction/ responsibility and authority to receive and resolve during construction complaints. A clear appeal process to the owner shall
Contact information for Development Services
the on-site construction Department, Building
supervisor and a clear and Safety
appeal process that willbe established prior to construction commencement that will allow for resolution of noise problems that allow for reduction of noise problems shall

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCEMit.

No.

Mitigation Measure/
Conditions of Approval
Monitoring Milestone
(Frequency)
Method of
Verification
Party Responsible
for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor. be provided to the City of Lancaster.
7 Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead During construction. of pneumatic or internal combustion power equipment,
where feasible.

Field Inspection.

Field Inspection.

Field Inspection.

Field Inspection.

Field inspection.

Development Services
Department, Building
and Safety
8 Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, During construction. parking and maintenance areas shall be located as far
away as practicable from noise sensitive receptors.

Development Services
Department, Building
and Safety
9 The use of noise producing signals, including horns, During construction. whistles, alarms, and bells shall be for safety warning purposes only.

Development Services
Department, Building
and Safety
10 11
No project-related public address or music system During construction. shall be audible at any adjacent receptor.

Development Services
Department, Building
and Safety
All noise producing construction equipment and During construction. vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be
equipped with mufflers, air-inlet silencers where
appropriate, and other shrouds, shields, or other
noise-reducing features in good operating condition
that meets or exceeds original factory specifications.

Mobile or fixed “package” equipment (e.g., arc-
welders, air compressors, etc.) shall be equipped with
shrouds and noise controls features that are readily
available for the type of equipment.

Development Services
Department,
Community Building
and Safety

HELIOGEN COND. USE: CIVIL PLANS
T
U
C
H
S
C
H
E
R
OWNERC/O JOSEPH LONGHELIOGEN INC.431 E AVE K-4, LANCASTER CA 93535323.809.0220 SHEET DESCRIPTIONPROJECT LOCATION431 E AVE K-4LANCASTER, CA 93535 C-1.0
C-2.0
C-3.0
C-4.0

TITLE SHEETEXISTING SITE PLAN

SITE PLAN
E
N
G
I
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONASSESSOR ID#:
3126-031-901 & 3126-031-902 ELEVATIONS N
E
E
R
I
PROJECT INFORMATION CIVIL ENGINEERJAMES TUCHSCHER, P.E.TEG, INC.130 PINE AVE, 3RD FLOORLONG BEACH, CA 90802310.613.9980 ZONING:LOT SIZE:

LANCASTER SPECIFIC PLAN 80-02854,323 SQ. FT. (19.61 AC.) M
N
GFLOOD ZONE: X, & A (OUTSIDE AREA OF PROP. DEV.)
G
R
O
U
P
STAMP

VICINITY MAPGRADING GENERAL NOTES
1 PROJECT DATADRAINAGE NOTES
2 PROJECT DIRECTORYFILL NOTES
3 SHEET INDEX 4NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES STAMP DATE1. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2014 CITY OF LOS ANGELES 1. ROOF DRAINAGE MUST BE DIVERTED FROM GRADED SLOPES. 1. ALL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPACTION CRITERIA: 1. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTEDCONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUMESOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OFCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, THATTHIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MADE TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT LIMITED TO NORMALWORKING HOURS.

MINIMUM BMP REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTCONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.BUILDING CODES AND THE STATE MODEL WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THESE PLANS. 1 95 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY2. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE FOR CONTRIBUTORY DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. THE RELATIVE COMPACTION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A.S.T.M. SOIL COMPACTION TESTD1557-91 WHERE APPLICABLE: WHERE NOT APPLICABLE, A TEST ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDINGOFFICIAL SHALL BE USED.

1. ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE AND MAY NOT BETRANSPORTED FROM THE STIE VIA SHEET FLOW, SWALES, AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGECOURSES OR WIND.

2. ANY MODIFICATIONS OF OR CHANGES TO APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BYTHE BUILDING OFFICIAL.

3. IF CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING WITHIN A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ARE TO BE DONE, ALLWORK IS TO BE DONE PER PRIVATE DRAIN PD NO.___________________ OR MISCELLANEOUSTRANSFER DRAIN MTD NO.___________________.

2. FIELD DENSITY SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.HOWEVER, NOT LESS THAN 10% OF THE REQUIRED DENSITY TEST, UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED, ANDSHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE SAND CONE METHOD.

3. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF LOS ANGELESMUNICIPAL CODE THAT REGULATES THE HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE USE OF CONSTRUCTIONAND GRADING EQUIPMENT.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCOMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION TO ARRANGE FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES. CALL1-800-422-4133 FOR THIS SERVICE. ANY UTILITY NOT SUBSCRIBING TO THIS SERVICE SHALL BECONTACTED DIRECTLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE WHETHERAL UTILITIES HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED.

2. STOCKPILES OR EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTEDFROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE BY THE FORCE OF WIND AND WATER.

4. ALL STORM DRAIN WORK IS TO BE DONE UNDER CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE FIELDENGINEER. 3. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF THE FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE TO DETERMINE THE RELATIVE COMPACTIONOF THE FILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES:3.A. ONE TEST FOR EACH TWO-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT.

3. FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO CONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVEDSTORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER. SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UPIMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THEDRAINAGE SYSTEM.

4. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE (SECTION 5097.98) AND HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE(SECTION 7050.5) ADDRESS THE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS. IN THEEVENT OF DISCOVERY OR RECOGNITION OF ANY HUMAN REMAINS IN ANY LOCATION OTHERTHAN A DEDICATED CEMETERY, THE LAW REQUIRES THAT GRADING IMMEDIATELY STOPS AND NOFURTHER EXCAVATION OR DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE, OR ANY NEARBY AREA WHERE HUMANREMAINS MAY BE LOCATED, OCCUR UNTIL THE FOLLOWING MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN:

GEOTECHNICAL NOTES
THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ADDENDUMS ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THE PLANS AND SHOULDBE KEPT AT THE JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TOPERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.

3.B. ONE TEST FOR EACH 1,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL PLACED.3.C. ONE TEST AT THE LOCATION OF THE FINAL FILL SLOPE FOR EACH(LOT) IN EACH FOUR-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT OR PORTION THEREOF.3.D. ONE TEST IN THE VICINITY OF EACH BUILDING PAD FOR EACHVERTICAL LIFT OR PORTION THEREOF.

BUILDING SITE
FOUR-FOOT 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES "BROWNBOOK".

4. NON-STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE WASHING AND ANY OTHERACTIVITY SHALL BE CONTAINED AT THE PROJECT SITE.4.A. THE COUNTY CORONER HAS BEEN INFORMED AND HAS DETERMINED THAT NOINVESTIGATION OF THE CAUSE OF DEATH IS REQUIRED, AND4.B. IF THE REMAINS ARE OF NATIVE AMERICAN ORIGIN, THE DESCENDANTS FROM THEDECEASED NATIVE AMERICANS HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE MEANS OFTREATING OR DISPOSING, WITH APPROPRIATE DIGNITY, OF THE HUMAN REMAINS AND ANYASSOCIATED GRAVE GOODS.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER

CONTACT INFORMATION ABOVE

4. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE TO VERIFY THAT THE SOIL PROPERTIES COMPLYWITH THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER INCLUDING SOIL TYPES,SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS AND CORRESPONDING UNIT WEIGHTS IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES:

5. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY OR ANY OTHERDRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON SITE UNTILTHEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE.

5. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL, BARRICADING, AND CONSTRUCTION SIGNING SHALL BE INCONFORMANCE WITH THE WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK (WATCH), DETOURSIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON WOOD OR METAL POSTS. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE POSTED ON ANYTREE OR TRAFFIC SIGN.

LIST OF REPORTS & ADDENEDUMS 6. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVEREDRECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OR RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND.

4.A. PRIOR AND SUBSEQUENT TO PLACEMENT OF THE FILL, SHEAR TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN ONEACH TYPE OF SOIL OR SOIL MIXTURE TO BE USED FOR ALL FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN THREE(3) HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL.4.B. SHEAR TEST RESULTS FOR THE PROPOSED FILL MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGNVALUES USED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TO DETERMINE SLOPE STABILITYREQUIREMENTS. OTHERWISE THE SLOPE MUST BE REEVALUATED USING THE ACTUAL SHEARTEST VALUE OF THE FILL MATERIAL THAT IS IN PLACE.

5. THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE. PARKING CALCULATION

6. NO WATER SHALL BE TAKEN FROM FIRE HYDRANTS WITHOUT APPROVAL FORM THEJURISDICTIONAL WATER AGENCY.

7. SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC.THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROADWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTSFROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITIONS MUST BE SWEPT UPIMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS.

6. ALL EXPORT OF MATERIAL FROM THE SITE MUST GO TO A PERMITTED SITE APPROVED BY THEBUILDING OFFICIAL OR A LEGAL DUMPSITE. RECEIPTS FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF EXCESSMATERIAL BY A DUMPSITE MAY BE REQUIRED. 1500REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING FOR A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT USE = S.F. OF 7. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY SWEEPING AND WATERING.BUILDING AREA. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND EXISTING = TOTAL BUILDING AREA OF8,888 S.F. THEREFORE THE REQUIRED PARKING IS 8,888/500 = 17.76 = 18 SPACES REQUIREDTHE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED IS 102 SPACES, 102>18 THEREFORE PARKING IS COMPLIANT

7. A COPY OF THE GRADING PERMIT AND APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST IN THE POSSESSIONOF A RESPONSIBLE PERSON AND AVAILABLE AT THE SITE AT ALL TIMES.

4.C. FILL SOILS SHALL BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 8. ALL NONSTORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ACTIVITIES AT THEPROJECT (I.E. MIXING AND CLEANING OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONCRETE AND PLASTERWASHOUT, DISPOSAL, OF PAINTS, ADHESIVES, SOLVENTS, AND LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS) SHALL BEPROHIBITED FROM ENTERING THE PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM (INCLUDING MUNICIPALSTREETS, CATCH BASINS, CURBS, GUTTERS, DITCHES, MAN-MADE CHANNELS OR UNDERGROUNDSTORM DRAINS).

8. ANY SLOPE WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED OF VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS ITOINHIBIT EROSION BY WIND AND WATER.5. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLANTED UNTIL STRIPPING OF VEGETATION, REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOILS,AND INSTALLATION OF SUBDRAIN (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILENGINEER. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE A "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR MOISTURE,ASH, ORGANIC MATTER, PEAT OR OTHER ORGANIC SOILS" ASTM D-2974-87 ON ANY SUSPECTMATERIAL. DETRIMENTAL AMOUNTS OF ORGANIC MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN FILLS.SOIL CONTAINING SMALL AMOUNTS OF ROOTS MAY BE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT THE ROOTSARE IN A QUANTITY AND DISTRIBUTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THEFUTURE USE OF THE SITE AND THE SOILS ENGINEER APPROVES THE USE OF SUCH MATERIAL.

8. NO GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF ANY OAKTREE. THE PROTECTED ZONE SHALL MEAN THAT AREA WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF AN OAK TREEEXTENDING THERE FROM A POINT AT LEAST FIVE FEET OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINE, OR 15 FEET FROMTHE TRUNK(S) OF A TREE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

9. ADDITIONAL BMPS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY CITY INSPECTORS.

WM-1 MATERIAL STORAGE AND DELIVERYPROVIDE A MATERIAL STORAGE AREA WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND/OR WEATHERPROTECTION. NOTE THE MAINTENANCE PRACTICES AND SCHEDULE PROPOSED FOR THIS AREA.9. A PREVENTIVE PROGRAM TO PROTECT THE SLOPES FROM POTENTIAL DAMAGE FROMBURROWING RODENTS IS REQUIRED. OWNER IS TO INSPECT SLOPES PERIODICALLY FOREVIDENCE OF BURROWING RODENTS AND AT FIRST EVIDENCE OF THEIR EXISTENCE SHALL EMPLOYAN EXTERMINATOR FOR THEIR REMOVAL.

WM-2 MATERIAL USEHAZARDOUS MATERIALS, FERTILIZERS, PESTICIDES, PLASTERS, SOLVENTS, PAINTS, AND OTHERCOMPOUNDS MUST BE PROPERLY HANDLED IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE RISK OF POLLUTION ORCONTAMINATION. TRAINING AND INFORMATION ON PROCEDURES FOR THE PROPER USE OF ALLMATERIALS MUST BE AVAILABLE TO THE EMPLOYEES THAT APPLY SUCH MATERIALS.

6. ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THEFILL UNLESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUCH PLACEMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE SOILENGINEER AND APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. LOCATION, EXTENT, ANDELEVATION OR ROCK DISPOSAL AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON AN "AS BUILT" GRADING PLAN.

10. IF GRADING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PLAN IS TO EXTEND THROUGH THE RAINY SEASON, NOVEMBER 1THROUGH APRIL 15 OF THE FOLLOWING YEAR, SEPARATE UPDATED PLANS FOR EROSIONCONTROL MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OCTOBER.

WM-4 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL7. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE SOIL ENGINEER, OR A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BEPROVIDED DURING ALL FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OPERATIONS WHERE FILLS HAVE ADEPTH GREATER THAN 30 FEET OR SLOPE SURFACE STEEPER THAN 2:1.

IDENTIFY SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES THAT WILL BE TAKEN FOR ALL PROPOSEDMATERIALS. IDENTIFY THE METHODS, BY WHICH ACCIDENTAL SPILLS WILL BE CLEANED AND PROPERLYDISPOSED OF.

11. MAX ALLOWABLE GRADING QUANTITY PER LAMC 12.21 (C)(10)(f):1000 CY + 10% OF LOT AREA x 75% (FOR LOTS ON SUBSTANDARD HILLSIDE STREET)=1000 CY + (10% OF 6,616) x (75%) = 1,496.2 CY 8. FILL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 2:1 STEEPNESS RATIO ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE PLACEMENT OFSOIL AT SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BEYOND THE PROPOSED FINISH SLOPE TO ALLOW COMPACTIONEQUIPMENT TO BE OPERATED AT THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE FINAL SLOPE SURFACE. THE EXCESSFILLS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. OTHER CONSTRUCTIONPROCEDURES MAY BE USED WHEN IT IS DEMONSTRATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDINGOFFICIAL THAT THE ANGLE OF SLOPE, CONSTRUCTION METHOD AND OTHER FACTS WILL HAVEEQUIVALENT EFFECT.

WM-5 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTPROVIDE DESIGNATED WASTE COLLECTION AREAS AND CONTAINERS. ARRANGE FOR REGULARDISPOSAL. PROVIDE COVERED STORAGE WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. CONTAINERS AREREQUIRED TO PROTECT WASTE FROM RAIN TO PREVENT WATER POLLUTION AND PREVENT WINDDISPERSAL.WM-6 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENTHAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERALREGULATIONS. IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED METHODS OF DISPOSAL AND ANY SPECIAL HANDLINGCONTRACTS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE. REVISIONS BYWM-7 CONTAMINATED SOIL MANAGEMENTPREVENT OR REDUCE THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORMWATER FROM CONTAMINATED SOILAND HIGHLY ACIDIC OR ALKALINE SOILS BY CONDUCTING PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEYS,INSPECTING EXCAVATIONS REGULARLY, AND PREMEDITATING CONTAMINATED SOIL PROMPTLY. 1 11/17/2022 JHD
WM-8 CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENTSTORE DRY AND WET MATERIALS UNDER COVER. AVOID ONSITE WASHOUT EXCEPT IN DESIGNATEDAREAS AWAY FROM DRAINS, DITCHES, STREETS, AND STREAMS,. CONCRETE WASTE DEPOSITED ONSITE SHALL SET-UP, BE BROKEN APART, AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY. CONTAINMENT AND PROPERDISPOSAL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONCRETE WASTE.WM-9 SANITARY/SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENTUNTREATED RAW WASTEWATER IS NOT TO BE DISCHARGED OR BURIED. SANITARY SEWER FACILITIESON SITE ARE REQUIRED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL HEALTH AGENCY REQUIREMENTS.SANITARY OR SEPTIC WASTES MUST BE TREATED OR DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE ANDLOCAL REQUIREMENTS.TC-1 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEA STABILIZED ENTRANCE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION SITES TO ENSURE THAT DIRT ANDDEBRIS ARE NOT TRACKED ONTO THE ROAD OR ADJACENT PROPERTY. MAINTENANCE OF SUCH A JOB #: 7-22-2464SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. SUCH STABILIZATION MAY BE OF ROCK OR DATE: 9/7/2022PAVED. SCALE: NTSSE-1 SILT FENCE / SE-3 SEDIMENT TRAP / SE-8 SAND BAGSERODED SEDIMENTS MUST BE RETAINED ONSITE AND NOT PERMITTED TO ENTER THE DRAINAGESYSTEM. MAY BE WAIVED AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR IF OTHER EROSIONCONTROL BMPS ARE DEEMED SUFFICIENT.

C-1.0GENERAL NOTES 5 SHEET 1 OF 4

T
U
C
H
S
C
H
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
G
R
O
U
P
STAMP

STAMP DATE

45.05'

31.33' 1
3542.2 SQ. FT.
256.27'
3399.3 SQ. FT. 24.80' 10.11'

14.32'

9.45'

7.46'
REVISIONS BY7.03' 7.73'
1 11/17/2022 JHD20.11'

39.81' 29.60'

28.34'1830.9 SQ. FT.
136.63'

16.35'

16.35' 27.94'

18.00' (TYP.)

30.36'

17.47' 21.70'26.57' JOB #: 7-22-2464
DATE: 9/7/2022
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
C-2.0EXISTING SITE PLAN 1
SHEET 1 OF 4
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"

T
U
C
H
S
C
H
E
R
10' CHAINLINK FENCE DETAIL TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL
LEGEND
CONSTRUCTION NOTESPROP. 24,300 SQ. FT. FIELD OF APPROX. 400± PHOTOVOLTAICSGENERATING 100± KW 1 2PROPERTY LINE HYDROGEN COMPRESSION/STORAGE/REFUELING STATIONPROP. ACCESS DRIVE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AROUNDPHOTOVOLTAICSPROP. 6' CHAINLINK FENCE SURROUNDING RESEARCH ANDRECEIVING TOWERSPROP. RESEARCH TOWER (55' NOMINAL HEIGHT) TO BE BUILTDIRECTLY ADJACENT TO EXISTING RECEIVING TOWER 3EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
4 5PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE

PROPOSED PHOTOVOLTAIC FIELD
6 EX. RECEIVING TOWER (55' NOMINAL HEIGHT)

EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCH

EXISTING SIDEWALK
7 8 N
G9 EX. BUILDINGS TO REMAINNUMBER PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
10' FENCE
G
R
O
U
P
10 11
EX. PARKING AREA TO REMAINPROP. UTILITY LINE FOR HYDROGEN REFUELING STATIONEXISTING HELIOSTATS 6' FENCE
6' CHAINLINK FENCE DETAIL PROP. 20' X 40' AREA FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION EQUIPMENTCONSISTING OF: TELEMETRY & CONTROL CABINET (TCC); POWERMODULE; GENERATION MODULE; & STEAM FLOW MODULE 12 STAMP
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 NOT IN USENOT IN USENOT IN USELANDSCAPING NOTE DE-IONIZED WATER SYSTEMPER CONDITIONS OF DR 19-57, HELIOGEN INSTALLED ADDITIONALLANDSCAPING PER THE LANDSCAPING PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY OFLANCASTER ON 12/9/2020. NO ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO LANDSCAPINGARE PLANNED.

STAMP DATE
6 300 FT HYDROGEN STORAGE TANKS

SAGUARO RECTIFIER MODULE
DIMENSIONAL ENERGY UNIT REACTOR #1
DIMENSIONAL ENERGY UNIT REACTOR #2
EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION WITH PROP. ROOF

EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE
22 EXISTING 48,000 SQ. FT. HELIOSTAT FIELD
PROP. 5' X 5' AREA FOR SYNTHETIC FUEL STORAGE
PROP. 10' X 20' AREA FOR SYNTHETIC FUEL STORAGE
3542.2 SQ. FT.25' REAR YARD SETBACK 3399.3 SQ. FT.
9 923
1830.9 SQ. FT.
7 1 10217
23 77 7
20 86.99' 2549.99' 10.00'19
24 18 7

17.00' 18.00'12
6 45' FRONT YARD SETBACK 2
BY23.60'
17 1 REVISIONS163 8.21'11 1 11/17/2022 JHD9.81'45
8 8
8 SITE DETAILS JOB #: 7-22-2464
DATE: 9/7/2022
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"

NAME EXISTING PROPOSED

17.9 LOT AREA 856523.0 SQ. FT.
%

EXCAVATION NOTICE CALL
BEFORE A PERMIT TO EXCAVATE WILL BEVALID, CONTACT DIG ALERT FOR DIGALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 48HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATION LOT
COVERAGE*
F.A.R.

15.9 811

0.01 N/A
C-3.0
*PHOTOVOLTAIC FIELDS AND HELIOSTAT FIELDS ARE CONSIDEDERED IMPERVIOUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CALCULATION.

SITE PLAN 1SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
SHEET 4 OF 4

T
U
C
H
S
C
H
E
R
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I

EXISTING RECEIVING TOWER
N

GPROPOSED RESEARCH TOWER
G
R
O
U
P

PROPOSED SAGUARO POWER GENERATIONAND CONDITIONING UNITS, TELEMETRY UNIT,AND STEAM FLOW MODULE STAMP

DI WATER SYSTEMDIMENSIONAL ENERGY UNITSPROPOSED SOLAR PANELS PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE EXISTING HELIOSTATS EXISTING 10' HIGHCHAINLINK FENCE

EXISTING HELIOSTATS

STAMP DATE
SOUTH ELEVATION 1SCALE: 1" = 15'-0"

PROPOSED HYDROGEN COMPRESSION/STORAGE/REFUELING STATION

REVISIONS BY
PROPOSED ROOF OVER EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 11/17/2022 JHD JOB #: 7-22-2464
DATE: 9/7/2022
SCALE: 1" = 15'-0"
C-4.0SOUTH ELEVATION - CONTINUED 2
SHEET 4 OF 4
SCALE: 1" = 15'-0"

City of LancasterInitial Study1.

2. Project title and File Number:

Lead agency name and address:

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Heliogen R&D FacilityCity of LancasterDevelopment Services DepartmentCommunity Development Division44933 Fern AvenueLancaster, California 935343. Contact person and phone number: Jocelyn Swain, Senior PlannerCity of LancasterDevelopment Services Department(661) 723-61004.

5. Location: 431 East Avenue K-4(APNs: 3126-031-901, 3126-031-902)(see Figure 1)Applicant name and address: Heliogen, Inc.130 West Union StreetPasadena, CA 911036.

7. General Plan designation:

Zoning:

Specific Plan/Light IndustrialSpecific Plan No. 80-02 (Business ParkSpecific Plan – Phase I & II)8. Description of project:The proposed project consists of the expansion of the existing Heliogen Research &Development facility at 431 East Avenue K-4 to include additional testing operations;commercial hydrogen production would not occur on the project site. Specifically, the projectwould include expanding the uses at the project site to include the following:
• Hydrogen production, processing, storing, and dispensing; • Electricity production using a photovoltaic field; and • Synthetic fuel production and storage.Rev. 23/18/10

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 2In order to support this additional research and development, the following equipment would beinstalled at the southern end of the subject property as shown in Figure 2:• An additional 55-foot tower and receiver;• 100 kilowatt (kW) photovoltaic solar field (approximately 400 panels);• Stationary electrolyzer cell power system (used for hydrogen production) comprisedof a telemetry cabinet and four modules: 1) power module; 2) generation module; 3)rectifier module; and 4) steam flow module;• Six 300 cubic foot (volume) hydrogen gas cylinders; • Hydrogen transfer line• Hydrogen compression/storage/dispensing unit; • Thermal reactor for synthetic fuel production; and
• Fischer Tropsch reactor for synthetic fuel production Additional information regarding each of the activities and equipment is provided below.TowerA 55-foot tower would be installed on the project site adjacent to the existing on-site tower. Thetower would support the expanded R&D uses on the site would be similar in appearance to theexisting tower.Photovoltaic Solar FieldApproximately 400 photovoltaic (PV) solar panels would be integrated into the existing heliostatfields to generate 100 kW of power. The purpose of the PV solar panels is to test various PVcomponents, including storage, panels, frames, etc., for solar thermal application.Hydrogen Production, Processing, Storage, and DispensingHydrogen production capabilities would be tested at the project site including storage(compressed/solid state), water capture, power generation from hydrogen, and hydrogenventing/dispensing. Hydrogen production would take place using a stationary electrolyzer cellpower system energized by the concentrated solar power (CSP) produced from the solar field aswell as grid power. Once the hydrogen is produced, it would be 1) used for production ofsynthetic fuels, or 2) transferred via a hydrogen transfer line into the compression/storage unit.This storage unit would consist of a hydrogen drying unit and compression and/or solid-statestorage system. Approximately 500 kg of hydrogen would be produced a day, and the storageunit volume would be approximately 1,000 kg of hydrogen. Hydrogen venting/dispensing wouldoccur onsite consistent with federal, state, and local regulations. Hydrogen produced on sitewould be for project use only and not available to the public. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 3Synthetic Fuel Production and StorageSynthetic crude would be produced using the following process:

1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2) is captured from the air or from point sources.2. Hydrogen produced from the processes described above is fed along with the carbondioxide into a proprietary thermal reactor, which produces the synthetic fuel precursorcalled “Syngas”. The thermal reactor can be heated by electricity or by a combinationof electricity and high quality solar industrial process heat.

3. The Syngas is converted into hydrocarbons using a Fischer Tropsch reactor.4. The hydrocarbons are processed and isomerized into whichever fuel or chemical isdesired (note that step 4 would not be completed at the project site; rather, thehydrocarbon crude produced at the project site would be transported to other locationsfor further refinement).Approximately 20-40 gallons of crude would be produced per day at the project site. Thematerials would all be generated, tested, and stored in compliance with federal, state, and localregulations.ConstructionConstruction would occur over a 3 month period with approximately 12 construction workers.No demolition and minimal, if any, grading of the project site would be required. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 4
Figure 1, Project Location Map
2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 5
Figure 2, Conceptual Site Plan2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 6

9. Surrounding land uses and setting:The project site is located at 431 East Avenue K-4 which is within the boundaries of the City’sBusiness Park. The project site is the former location of the City’s Golf Center and DrivingRange. This area of the business park contains a variety of industrial, commercial and residentialuses. The iLead Lancaster Charter School is located to the east along Avenue K-4 and there is anapartment complex directly east of the northern half of the project site. South of the project site,along Avenue K-6 are all of the Los Angeles County offices including the County Assessor andthe Department of Public Social Services.

Table 1Zoning/Land Use InformationZoningDirectionNorth
CityR-7,000
CountyN/A
Land UseSingle family residential subdivision, vacantlandEast R-7,000/CSP 80-02 N/A
N/A
N/A
Single family residences, small retail center,vacant landMulti-family residential apartment complex,commercial/industrial buildingsIndustrial buildings with a variety ofcommercial and industrial uses South
West
SP 80-02

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g. permits, financing approval, orparticipation agreement.)Approvals from other public agencies for the proposed project include, but are not limited to, thefollowing:• Los Angeles County Fire Department• Los Angeles County Sanitation District #14• Los Angeles County Waterworks #40• Southern California Edison• Southern California Gas• Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 711. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the projectarea requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? If so, is therea plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts totribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52, consultation letters for the proposed project were sentto three individuals associated with three tribes identified who have requested to be included in theprocess. These letters were mailed on December 22, 2022 via certified return receipt mail. Table 2identifies the tribes, the person to whom the letter was directed, and the date the letter wasreceived.

Table 2Tribal NotificationTribe Person/Title Date ReceivedGabrieleno Band of Mission Indians –Kizh Nation Andrew Salas, Chairman December 29, 2022Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Ryan Nordness, Cultural ResourceAnalystSarah Brunzell, Manager CulturalResources Management Division December 29, 2022
December 30, 2022
Fernandeno Tataviam Band of MissionIndians
A response was received from the Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians. The responseindicated that as there is no proposed grading or demolition associated with the proposed project,they had no concerns and would not be requesting consultation. No other tribes responded to theletter. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 8ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at leastone impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.Aesthetics __ Agriculture and Forestry __ Air QualityResources __
Biological Resources
Geology/Soils
__ Cultural Resources __ Energy__
__ __ Greenhouse Gas Emissions __ HazardsMaterials
& HazardousHydrology/Water Quality
Noise
__ Land Use/Planning
__ Population/Housing
__ Transportation
__ Wildfire
__ Mineral Resources__
__
__
__
__ Public ServicesRecreation __ Tribal Cultural ResourcesUtilities/Service Systems __ Mandatory Findings ofSignificance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation:____ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and aNEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.__X__ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, therewill not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by oragreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will beprepared.____ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and anENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.____ I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentiallysignificant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has beenadequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) hasbeen addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attachedsheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only effectsthat remain to be addressed. ____ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR orNEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided ormitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions ormitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

February 7, 2023__ _____ ___________________DateJocelyn Swain, Senior Planner2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 9EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequatelysupported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following eachquestion. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sourcesshow that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the projectfalls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is basedon project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitivereceptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis. 2)
3)
All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well asoperational impacts.Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then thechecklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significantwith mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there issubstantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “PotentiallySignificant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4)
5)
“Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where theincorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact”to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, andbriefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measuresfrom “Earlier Analyses,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced).

Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQAprocess, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:a. Earlier Analysis Use. Identify and state where they are available for review.b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist werewithin the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicablelegal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measuresbased on the earlier analysis.c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less Than Significant with MitigationMeasures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated orrefined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specificconditions for the project.6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sourcesfor potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously preparedor outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages w3herethe statement is substantiated. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 107)
8)
Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used orindividuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, leadagencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’senvironmental effects in whatever format is selected.9) The explanation of each issue should identify:a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluated each question; and b. The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 11
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationI. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public ResourcesCode Section 21099, would the project:a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X Xb) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, butnot limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historicbuildings with a state scenic highway?c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade theexisting visual character or quality or public views ofthe site and its surroundings? (Public views are thosethat are experienced from publicly accessible vantagepoint). If the project is in an urbanized area, would theproject conflict with applicable zoning and otherregulations governing scenic quality? X
Xd) Create a new source of substantial light or glare whichwould adversely affect day or nighttime views of thearea? a. The City of Lancaster General Plan identifies five scenic areas in the City and immediatelysurrounding area (LMEA Figure 12.0-1). Views of these scenic areas are not visible from theproject site or the immediately surrounding roadways as the project site is located in the urbancore; specifically, within the City’s Business Park. However, some views of the mountainssurrounding the Antelope Valley may be available from the project site and nearby roadways(Division Street, Avenue K, Avenue K-4, 5 th Street East). The proposed project consists of asmall expansion to the research and development activities at the existing Heliogen facility at431 East Avenue K-4. This expansion would be similar in appearance to the existing, operatingfacility. Specifically, the installation of an additional 55-tower. As the facility is fenced andscreened, it is unlikely that the other components would be immediately visible. Withimplementation of the proposed project, the any existing views would not change and wouldcontinue to be available from the roadways and project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b.
c.

The project site is not located along any designated State Scenic Highways. There are no Statedesignated scenic routes or highways within the City of Lancaster. The project site currentlycontains some buildings and perimeter trees. These buildings and trees would remain. There areno rock outcroppings on the site. Therefore, no impacts would occur.

The proposed project is consistent with the zoning code and general plan designation for theproject site. The project site is located within the boundaries of Specific Plan No. 80-022019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 12(Lancaster Business Park, Phases I & II) and has an underlying zoning of Light Industrial. Theproposed project would also be in conformance with the City’s Design Guidelines which wereadopted on December 8, 2009 (updated on March 30, 2010). These guidelines provide the basisto achieve quality design for all development within the City. The proposed project wouldcontinue to utilize the existing buildings on the site; no other buildings would be constructed.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d. The ambient lighting in the vicinity of the project site is moderate to high due to the project site’slocation in the central portion of the City and within the City’s Business Park. Primary sources oflighting are due to street lights, vehicle headlights, security lighting, andresidential/commercial/industrial lighting from the land uses surrounding the project site. Lightand glare would be generated from the proposed project in the form of additional projectsite/security lighting and the installation of the additional solar field. Parking lot and buildinglighting would remain the same. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 13
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationII. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. Indetermining whether impacts to agricultural resourcesare significant environmental effects, lead agencies mayrefer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation andSite Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optionalmodel to use in assessing impacts on agriculture andfarmland. In determining whether impacts to forestresources, including timberland, are significantenvironmental effects, lead agencies may refer toinformation compiled by the California Department ofForestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’sinventory of forest land, including the Forest and RangeAssessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessmentproject; and forest carbon measurement methodologyprovided in Forest Protocols adopted by the CaliforniaAir Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, orFarmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shownon the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mappingand Monitoring Program of the California ResourcesAgency, to non-agricultural use? X
Xb) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or aWilliamson Act contract?c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public ResourcesCode Section 4526), or timberland zoned TimberlandProduction (as defined by Government Code Section51104(g))? X
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non-forest use? X
X
e) Involve other changes in the existing environmentwhich, due to their location or nature, could result inconversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use orconversion of forest land to non-forest use? 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 14a. The California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, FarmlandMapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), tracks and categorizes land with respect toagricultural resources. Land is designated as one of the following and each has a specificdefinition: Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, Farmland ofLocal Importance, Grazing Land, Urban and Built-Up Land, Other Land, and Water.

The maps for each county are updated every two years. The Los Angeles County Farmland Mapwas last updated in 2018. Based on these maps, the project site is designated as Urban and Built-Up Land. Urban and Built-Up Land is land which is “occupied by structures with a buildingdensity of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately 6 structures to a 10-acre parcel. Commonexamples include residential, industrial, commercial, institutional facilities, cemeteries, airports,golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, and water control structures.” As the projectsite is not designated as farmland of importance by the State nor is it currently utilized foragricultural purposes, no impacts to agricultural resources would occur. b. The project site is zoned as SP 80-02 (Specific Plan – Lancaster Business Park) with anunderlying zoning of Light Industrial (LI) which does not allow for agricultural uses. Thesurrounding properties are zone a mix of R-7,000, Commercial (C), and SP 80-02 and also do notallow for agricultural uses. The project site is not under agricultural production and none of thesurrounding properties are under agricultural production. Additionally, the project site andsurrounding area are not subject to a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, no impacts wouldoccur. c-d. According to the City of Lancaster’s General Plan, there are no forests or timberlands locatedwithin the City of Lancaster. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the rezoning offorest or timberland and would not cause the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land tonon-forest land. Therefore, no impacts would occur.e. See responses to Items IIa-d. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 15
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationIII. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significancecriteria established by the applicable air qualitymanagement district or air pollution control district maybe relied upon to make the following determinations.Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of theapplicable air quality plan? X
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase ofany criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambientair quality standard? X
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutantconcentrations? X
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading toodors) adversely affecting a substantial number ofpeople? X
a.
b.

Development proposed under the City’s General Plan would not create air emissions that exceedthe Air Quality Management Plan (GPEIR pgs. 5.5-21 to 5.5-22). The proposed project isconsistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code. Additionally, air emissions generated by theproposed project would be less than the established thresholds (see III.b) and the proposedproject would comply with all Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD)Rules and Regulations. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstructimplementation of the Air Quality Management Plan and no impacts would occur.

An air quality analysis was prepared for the proposed project by SWCA EnvironmentalConsultants and documented in a report entitled “Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas TechnicalReport, Lancaster Solar R&D, Los Angeles County, California” and dated September 2022. Thisreport documents both the construction and operational emissions associated with the proposedproject.

As part of this study the anticipate construction and operational air emissions were calculated andcompared to the thresholds established by the AVAQMD. These thresholds are shown in Table3. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 16 Table 3AVAQMD Air Quality ThresholdsDaily Threshold(Pounds)137 Criteria PollutantOxides of Nitrogen (NOx)
Annual Threshold (Tons)2525251512100.6
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)Oxides of Sulfur (SOx)Particulate Matter (PM10)Particulate Matter (PM2.5)Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)Lead (Pb) 1371378265543
It is anticipated that construction of the proposed project would take approximately 65 days andutilize a variety of construction equipment. Construction would occur a maximum of 5 days aweek over an eight hour period. During operations, no additional employees would be requiredbeyond the current employees at the project site for operations and routine maintenance.Additional assumptions regarding construction and operation, including the specific types ofequipment, can be found in Appendix A to the Air Quality Report. Tables 4 and 5 provided theanticipated construction and operational emissions, respectively. As shown, these emissionswould be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required.

In addition, all equipment utilized on-site is required to have any necessary operational permits,including those issued by the AVAQMD. This would also ensure that emissions are notgenerated above levels which are permissible.Table 4Unmitigated Construction Emissions SummaryConstruction Phase ROGs NO x
CO PM1
0 PM2.
5 SO
2Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day)2023 2.81137No

25.7137No

27.0548No

1.7182No

1.1065No

0.04137No
Significance ThresholdThreshold Exceeded? Pollutant Emissions (tons per year)2023 0.0925No

0.8325No

0.88100No

0.0615No

0.0412No
<0.00525No
Significance ThresholdThreshold Exceeded?Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 17 Table 5Unmitigated Operational Emissions SummaryOperation Phase ROGs NO x
CO PM1
0 PM2.
5 SO
2Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day)2023 0.09137No

1.01137No

1.18548No

0.482No

0.0465No
<0.005137No
Significance ThresholdThreshold Exceeded? Pollutant Emissions (tons per year)2023 0.0125No

0.1325No

0.15100No

0.0115No

0.0112No
<0.00525No
Significance ThresholdThreshold Exceeded?Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report c. The closest sensitive receptor to the project site is the apartment complex located immediatelywest of the northern half of the property. As discussed in Item III.b, the proposed project wouldgenerate air emissions during both construction and operation. However, these air emissionswould not exceed the thresholds established by the AVAQMD nor would the traffic generated bythe proposed project impact nearby roadways or intersections.

The project would occur in a region that is in nonattainment for O (ozone) and PM . 3 10
Concurrent construction of other projects in proximity to project activities could result inincreased air quality impacts during simultaneous construction activities. However, all projectswould be required to comply with AVAQMD rules and regulations, including those pertaining todust control. Construction related O3 precursors would not be at a cumulatively considerablelevel. With implementation of applicable AVAQMD best available control measures, the projectwould not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants.Operational emissions would result from potential on-site, off-road equipment and routineclearing of mirrors. These emission levels are below AVAQMD thresholds and would not resultin a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants. Therefore, impacts wouldbe less than significant.

However, since the construction of the proposed project would result in the disturbance of thesoil, it is possible individuals could be exposed to Valley Fever. Valley Fever orcoccidioidomycosis, is primarily a disease of the lungs caused by the spores of the Coccidioidesimmitis fungus. The spores are found in soils, become airborne when the soil is disturbed, andare subsequently inhaled into the lungs. After the fungal spores have settled in the lungs, theychange into a multicelluar structure called a spherule. Fungal growth in the lungs occurs as thespherule grows and bursts, releasing endospores, which then develop into more spherules.

Valley Fever is not contagious, and therefore, cannot be passed on from person to person. Mostof those who are infected would recover without treatment within six months and would have alife-long immunity to the fungal spores. In severe cases, especially in those patients with rapidand extensive primary illness, those who are at risk for dissemination of disease, and those whohave disseminated disease, antifungal drug therapy is used. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 18Nearby sensitive receptors as well as workers at the project site could be exposed to Valley Feverfrom fugitive dust generated during construction. There is the potential that cocci spores wouldbe stirred up during excavation, grading, and earth-moving activities, exposing constructionworkers and nearby sensitive receptors to these spores and thereby to the potential of contractingValley Fever. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures 2 (see Geology and Soils)which requires the project operator to implement dust control measures in compliance withAVAQMD Rule 403, and implementation of Mitigation Measure 1, below, which would providepersonal protective respiratory equipment to construction workers and provide information toall construction personnel and visitors about Valley Fever, the risk of exposure to Valley Feverwould be minimized to a less than significant level.

Mitigation Measures1. Prior to ground disturbance activities, the project operator shall provide evidence to theDevelopment Services Director that the project operator and/or construction manager hasdeveloped a “Valley Fever Training Handout”, training, and schedule of sessions foreducation to be provided to all construction personnel. All evidence of the training sessionmaterials, handout(s) and schedule shall be submitted to the Development Services Directorwithin 24 hours of the first training session. Multiple training sessions may be conducted ifdifferent work crews will come to the site for different stages of construction; however, allconstruction personnel shall be provided training prior to beginning work. The evidencesubmitted to the Development Services Director regarding the “Valley Fever TrainingHandout” and Session(s) shall include the following:
• A sign-in sheet (to include the printed employee names, signature, and date) for allemployees who attended the training session.• Distribution of a written flier or brochure that includes educational informationregarding the health effects of exposure to criteria pollutant emissions and ValleyFever.• Training on methods that may help prevent Valley Fever infection.• A demonstration to employees on how to use personal protective equipment, such asrespiratory equipment (masks), to reduce exposure to pollutants and facilitaterecognition of symptoms and earlier treatment of Valley Fever. Where respirators arerequired, the equipment shall be readily available and shall be provided toemployees for use during work. Proof that the demonstration is included in the trainingshall be submitted to the county. This proof can be via printed trainingmaterials/agenda, DVD, digital media files, or photographs.

The project operator also shall consult with the Los Angeles County Public Health to developa Valley Fever Dust Management Plan that addresses the potential presence of theCoccidioides spore and mitigates for the potential for Coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever).Prior to issuance of permits, the project operator shall submit the Plan to the Los AngelesCounty Public Health for review and comment. The Plan shall include a program toevaluate the potential for exposure to Valley Fever from construction activities and toidentify appropriate safety procedures that shall be implemented, as needed, to minimize 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 19personnel and public exposure to potential Coccidioides spores. Measures in the Plan shallinclude the following:• Provide HEP-filters for heavy equipment equipped with factory enclosed cabs capable ofaccepting the filters. Cause contractors utilizing applicable heavy equipment to furnishproof of worker training on proper use of applicable heavy equipment cabs, such asturning on air conditioning prior to using the equipment. • Provide communication methods, such as two-way radios, for use in enclosed cabs.• Require National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved half-face respirators equipped with minimum N-95 protection factor for use during workercollocation with surface disturbance activities, as required per the hazard assessmentprocess. • Cause employees to be medically evaluated, fit-tested, and properly trained on the use ofthe respirators, and implement a full respiratory protection program in accordance withthe applicable Cal/OSHA Respiratory Protection Standard (8 CCR 5144). • Provide separate, clean eating areas with hand-washing facilities.• Install equipment inspection stations at each construction equipment access/egress point.Examine construction vehicles and equipment for excess soil material and clean, asnecessary, before equipment is moved off-site.• Train workers to recognize the symptoms of Valley Fever, and to promptly reportsuspected symptoms of work-related Valley Fever to a supervisor.• Work with a medical professional to develop a protocol to medically evaluate employeeswho develop symptoms of Valley Fever.• Work with a medical professional, in consultation with the Los Angeles County PublicHealth, to develop an educational handout for on-site workers and surroundingresidents within three miles of the project site, and include the following information onValley Fever: what are the potential sources/ causes, what are the commonsymptoms, what are the options or remedies available should someone be experiencingthese symptoms, and where testing for exposure is available. Prior to construction permitissuance, this handout shall have been created by the project operator and reviewed bythe project operator and reviewed by the Development Services Director. No less than30 days prior to any work commencing, this handout shall be mailed to all existingresidences within a specified radius of the project boundaries as determined by theDevelopment Services Director. The radius shall not exceed three miles and is dependentupon the location of the project site. • When possible, position workers upwind or crosswind when digging a trench orperforming other soil-disturbing tasks.• Prohibit smoking at the worksite outside of designated smoking areas; designatedsmoking areas will be equipped with handwashing facilities.• Post warnings on-site and consider limiting access to visitors, especially those withoutadequate training and respiratory protection. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 20• Audit and enforce compliance with relevant Cal OSHA health and safety standards onthe job site.d. Construction of the proposed project is not anticipated to produce significant objectionableodors. Construction equipment may generate some odors, but these odors would be similar tothose produced by vehicles traveling along Avenue K, Avenue K-4, Division Street, and 5 th Street East. Operation of the proposed project does not include any component with the potentialto generate odorous emissions. Therefore, no impact would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 21
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationIV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly orthrough habitat modifications, on any species identifiedas a candidate, sensitive, or special status species inlocal or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by theCalifornia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service? X
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitator other sensitive natural community identified in localor regional plans, policies, regulations, or by theCalifornia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service? X
X
X
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federallyprotected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any nativeresident or migratory fish or wildlife species or withestablished native resident or migratory wildlifecorridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurserysites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protectingbiological resources, such as a tree preservation policy orordinance? X
X
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted HabitatConservation Plan, Natural Community ConservationPlan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitatconservation plan? a. The project site was previously developed with the City’s Golf Center and Driving Range. Thisfacility has not been in operation for some time and was ultimately leased to Heliogen by theCity. Additionally, the project site is located in the urban core and is completely surrounded bydevelopment. There is no longer any grass at the facility although there are perimeter trees andlandscaping around the existing buildings. The project site does not provide any habitat forsensitive plant or animal species though it does provide habitat for nesting birds in the perimeter 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 22trees. These trees would remain and not be disturbed by project construction or operation.Therefore, no impacts to biological resources would occur.b. The project site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communitiesidentified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fishand Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, no impact would occur.c. d.
e.

There are no State or federally protected wetlands on the project site as defined by Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act. Therefore, no impacts would occur.The project site is not part of an established migratory wildlife corridor. Therefore, no impactswould occur.The proposed project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances, such as a treepreservation policy, protecting biological resources. The proposed project would be subject to therequirements of Ordinance No. 848, Biological Impact Fee, which requires the payment of$770/acre to help offset the cumulative loss of biological resources in the Antelope Valley as aresult of development. This fee is required of all projects occurring on previously undevelopedland regardless of the biological resources present and is utilized to enhance biological resourcesthrough education programs and the acquisition of property for conservation. Therefore, noimpacts would occur. f. There are no Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or otherapproved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plans which are applicable to the projectsite. The West Mojave Coordinated Habitat Conservation Plan only applies to federal land,specifically land owned by the Bureau of Land Management. In conjunction with theCoordinated Management Plan, a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) was proposed which wouldhave applied to all private properties within the Plan Area. However, this HCP was neverapproved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife nor was it adopted by the localagencies (counties and cities) within the Plan Area. As such, there is no HCP that is applicable tothe project site and no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 23
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ofa historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? X
X
X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ofan archaeological resources pursuant to §15064.5?c) Disturb any human remains, including those interredoutside of dedicated cemeteries? a-c. The project site was previously developed with the City’s Golf Center and Driving Range. Thisfacility has not been in operation for some time and was ultimately leased to Heliogen by theCity. Additionally, the project site is located in the urban core and is completely surrounded bydevelopment. The proposed project involves an expansion to the existing R&D operations at thefacility. An additional solar field will be installed (approximately 400 panels), a second tower ofapproximately 55 feet, and additional equipment. Minimal, if any grading would be required andall existing facilities would remain in place. As the site was previously developed, there are noknown cultural resources on the project site. No human remains, including those interred outsideof formal cemeteries, were identified on the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 24
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationVI. ENERGY. Would the project:a) Result in potentially significant environmental impactdue to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumptionof energy resources, during project construction oroperation? X
Xb) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan forrenewable energy or energy efficient? a. Project construction would require energy consumption during the 3-month period to operateconstruction vehicles and equipment. Fuel energy consumed during construction would betemporary and would not represent a significant demand on energy resources. In addition, someincidental energy conservation would occur during construction through compliance with Staterequirements that equipment not in use for more than five minutes be turned off. Projectconstruction equipment would also be required to comply with the latest EPA and CARB engineemissions standards. These emissions standards require highly efficient combustion systems thatmaximize fuel efficiency and reduce unnecessary fuel consumption.

Project operation would require some energy resources in order to run existing buildings andequipment. This consumption is already occurring. The expansion would generate power fromthe additional solar field and the energy required for the expanded R&D operations will testprocesses ultimately to be utilized to generate cleaner fuel. As such, no impacts to energyresources would occur.

The project would adhere to all applicable Federal, State, and local requirements for energyefficiency, including the Title 24 standards, as well as the project's design features and as suchthe project would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy.Therefore, no impacts would occur.b. The proposed project is an expansion of an existing R&D facility for the generation of hydrogenfuel. This facility utilizes power from the grid for the existing building and generates power on-site through the existing and proposed photovoltaic solar arrays. These arrays generate power thatis used in the R&D processes. As such, the project would not conflict with or obstruct a state orlocal plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Therefore, the proposed project would haveno impact.2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 25
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationVII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverseeffects, including the risk of loss, injury, or deathinvolving:i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineatedon the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake FaultZoning Map issued by the State Geologist for thearea or based on other substantial evidence of aknown fault? Refer to Division of Mines andGeology Special Publication 42.

X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-relatedliquefaction?
ground failure, including X
Xiv) Landslides?b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, orthat would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateralspreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-Bof the Uniform Building Code (1994), creatingsubstantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? X
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ofseptic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systemswhere sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X
Xf) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologicalresource or site or unique geologic feature? a. The project site is not identified as being in or in proximity to a fault rupture zone (LMEA Figure2-5). According to the Seismic Hazard Evaluation of the Lancaster East and West Quadrangles,the project site may be subject to intense seismic shaking (LMEA pg. 2-16). However, the 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 26proposed project would be constructed in accordance with the seismic requirements of theUniform Building Code (UBC) adopted by the City, which would render any potential impacts toa less than significant level. The site is generally level and is not subject to landslides (SSHZ).Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced byearthquake shaking or other events. This phenomenon occurs in saturated soils that undergointense seismic shaking typically associated with an earthquake. There are three specificconditions that need to be in place for liquefaction to occur: loose granular soils, shallowgroundwater (usually less than 50 feet below ground surface) and intense seismic shaking. InApril 2019, the California Geologic Survey updated the Seismic Hazard Zones Map forLancaster (SSHZ) (https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/). Based on these maps,the project site is not located in an area at risk for liquefaction. No impacts would occur. b. The project site is rated as having a low risk for soil erosion (USDA SCS Maps) when cultivatedor cleared of vegetation. As such, there remains a potential for water and wind erosion duringconstruction. The proposed project would be required, under the provisions of the LancasterMunicipal Code (LMC) Chapter 8.16, to adequately wet or seal the soil to prevent wind erosion.Additionally, the following mitigation measure shall be required to control dust/wind erosion.

Water erosion controls must be provided as part of the proposed project's grading plans to bereviewed and approved by the Capital Engineering Division. These provisions, which are a partof the proposed project, would reduce any impacts to less than significant levels.Mitigation Measure

2. The applicant shall submit the required Construction Excavation Fee to the Antelope ValleyAir Quality Management District (AVAQMD) prior to the issuance of any grading and/orconstruction permits. This includes compliance with all prerequisites outlined in District Rule403, Fugitive Dust, including submission and approval of a Dust Control Plan, installation ofsignage and the completion of a successful onsite compliance inspection by an AVAQMDfield inspector. Proof of compliance shall be submitted to the City. c. Subsidence is the sinking of the soil caused by the extraction of water, petroleum, etc.Subsidence can result in geologic hazards known as fissures. Fissures are typically associatedwith faults or groundwater withdrawal, which results in the cracking of the ground surface.According to Figure 2-3 of the City of Lancaster's Master Environmental Assessment, the projectsite is not known to be within an area subject to fissuring, sinkholes, or subsidence or any otherform of geologic unit or soil instability. The closest sinkholes and fissures are located alongLancaster Boulevard and 20 th Street West approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the project site.For a discussion of potential impacts regarding liquefaction, please refer to Section Item VII.a.Therefore, no impacts would occur. d. The soil on the project site is characterized by a low shrink/swell potential (LMEA Figure 2-3).A soils report for the proposed project shall be submitted to the City by the project developerprior to any grading and the recommendations of the report shall be incorporated into thedevelopment of the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 27e.
f.

The project site (existing buildings) is already connected to the sanitary sewer system and noadditional sewer connections would be required. No septic or alternative means of waste waterdisposal are part of the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts would occur.The proposed project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource,site, or geologic feature. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 28
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationVIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would theproject:a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly orindirectly, that may have a significant impact on theenvironment? X
Xb) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulationadopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions ofgreenhouse gases? a. An air quality and greenhouse gas analysis was prepared for the proposed project by SWCAEnvironmental Consultants and documented in a report entitled “Air Quality and GreenhouseGas Technical Report, Lancaster Solar R&D, Los Angeles County, California” and datedSeptember 2022. This report documents both the construction and operational greenhouseemissions associated with the proposed project.Construction of the project would result in greenhouse gas emissions from constructionequipment and off-site motor vehicle trips carrying workers and materials. Operations andmaintenance of the project would result in low levels of greenhouse gas emissions from the on-site, off-road equipment and water use during routine cleaning of the mirrors. The total estimategreenhouse gas emissions for both construction and operation are provided in Table 6. As showin this table, the greenhouse gas emissions generated by the proposed project during constructionand operation would be less than significant. b. The City of Lancaster Final Climate Action Plan was adopted in March 2017. As part of theClimate Action Plan (CAP), a greenhouse gas emissions inventory for the City was developedwhich consisted of both community-wide emissions and emissions from government operationsfor future years based on demographic growth. The CAP also identified projects that wouldenhance the City’s ability to further reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A total of 61projects/measures across eight sectors were identified, which include: 1) transportation; 2)energy; 3) municipal operations; 4) water; 5) waste; 6) built environment; 7) community; and 8)land use. The forecasts do not account for any new federal, State, regional or local policies thatmay be implemented after 2015, nor does it assume that any policies in place in 2015 willbecome more stringent. Forecasts for both community and government operations were preparedfor 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050. Under all scenarios assessed, the City meets the 2020 target andmakes substantial progress towards achieving post-2020 reductions. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 29The proposed project would also be in compliance with GHG emissions goals and policiesidentified in the City of Lancaster’ General Plan (pgs. 2-19 to 2-24) and with the City’s ClimateAction Plan. Table 6Greenhouse Gas Emissions SummaryEmissions SourceConstructionSignificance ThresholdThreshold Exceeded? GHG Emissions (lbs/day)4,738548,000NoOperations 189Significance ThresholdThreshold Exceeded?Emissions SourceConstructionSignificance Threshold1 Threshold Exceeded?
548,000NoGHG Emissions (MT CO2e/yr)140101,605NoOperationsSignificance Threshold1 Threshold Exceeded?
22101,605No1. 100,000 tons/year = 101,605 MT/yr
2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 30
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationIX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Wouldthe project:a) Create a significant hazard to the public or theenvironment through the routine transport, use, ordisposal of hazardous materials? X
X
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or theenvironment through reasonably foreseeable upset andaccident conditions involving the release of hazardousmaterials into the environment?c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous oracutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste withinone-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list ofhazardous materials sites compiled pursuant toGovernment Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or theenvironment? X
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within twomiles of a public airport or public use airport, would theproject result in a safety hazard or excessive noise forpeople residing or working in the project area? X
Xf) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with anadopted emergency response plan or emergencyevacuation plan?g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly,to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involvingwildland fires? X
a-b. Project construction would require typical construction materials to install the solar array, tower,and ancillary equipment for the expansion of the R&D activities. No new buildings would beconstructed and no demolition of existing buildings would be required. Therefore, the proposedproject would not expose individuals or the environment to asbestos containing materials or lead-based paint. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 31Project operation would require the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials aspart of the R&D operations. The project site would have approximately six, 300-cubic footcylinders of hydrogen gas and one 1,000 kg cubic foot storage unit in addition to approximately50 gallons of synthetic crude on site at any given time. The use of these materials and the routineactivities on the project site would be conducted in compliance with all applicable regulations tominimize potential hazards to the public and to the environment.

The facility would also be equipped with any required/necessary safety mechanisms, which couldinclude fire protection and sprinkler systems, dust suppression systems, detectors/alarms,shutdown systems, and temperature monitoring and controls. These safety mechanisms would bedetermined as part of the engineering design. Additionally, the project would requirecoordination with, and approval by, the Los Angeles County Fire Department for fire access, lifesafety equipment, and hazardous materials permitting. These requirements have been identifiedin the mitigation measures below. With implementation of the mitigation measures, impactswould be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures3. The use, storage, and transport of hazardous materials associated with the operation of theproposed R&D facility shall be in compliance with all applicable regulations. Any necessarypermits shall be obtained from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, Antelope ValleyAir Quality Management District, or other applicable agency.

4. Disposal of any hazardous material shall be done in accordance with all applicableregulations and associated with an EPA HazWaste ID number issued for the project site.c. The project site is located within a mile of an existing or proposed school. The closest school tothe project site is the iLead Lancaster Charter School located at 254 East Avenue K-4,approximately 0.2 miles to the west of the project site. While a school is located within 0.2 milesof the project site, the proposed project would not generate hazardous emissions or handlehazardous/acutely hazardous materials. The proposed project would generate hydrogen fuel andsynthetic crude as part of hydrogen fuel R&D activities. All hazardous materials would betransported, stored, and utilized in accordance with all application rules and regulations. As such,impacts would be less than significant. d. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for the proposed project by SWCAEnvironmental Consulting. The results of the study are documented in a report entitled "Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment for the Heliogen Lancaster Test Site in Los Angeles County,California" and dated August 2022.As part of the environmental site assessment, a site visit was conducted on July 27, 2022. Thesubject site is vacant and no buildings are on the subject site. The subject property is mostlyvacant in the north and west, where it was formerly a golf driving range and a chip and putt golfcourse. It has a developed area and a stormwater spillway in the south and southeast. Thedeveloped area consists of a storage building and two larger workspace buildings. A linearcovered area for the driving range is east of the buildings. A metal cage for compressed gasstorage is next to the storage building with a nearby rack for metal and plastic tubing storage. Thecovered section to the east is currently used for storage of metal pipes and equipment. The 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 32channel spillway is dry, but some wind-borne trash was in the southern portion. The north of thesubject property is empty, but there are a fence and some wooden posts dividing it into a westand east side, both of which have some piles of wooden debris throughout. The southwest side ofthe subject property is mostly vacant graded land, but one area is covered with an array ofreflective panels and a metal tower. No evidence of leaks, spills, or potential sources ofcontamination was noted on or adjoining the subject property during the site visit.

In addition to the site visit, a regulatory records review was conducted for the project site. Theproject site is not located in any hazardous materials databases. Three sites were identified onproperties in the vicinity of the project site. However, due to status, location or type they are notconsidered an environmental concern for the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur. e.
f.

The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan. The nearest airfield, U.S. AirForce Plant 42, is located approximately 4 miles south of the project site. There are nocircumstances related to this proximity that could be expected to result in a safety hazard forpeople residing in the project area, therefore no impacts would occur.

The traffic generated by the proposed project would be minimal and is not expected to block theroadways. All roadways in the vicinity of the proposed project have already been improved.Therefore, the proposed project would not impair or physically block any identified evacuationroutes and would not interfere with any adopted emergency response plan. Impacts would notoccur. g. With the exception of project site that would remain undeveloped, the surrounding properties aredeveloped with a mix of commercial, residential and industrial uses. It is possible that theundeveloped portion of the project site could be subject to grass fires and the surrounding usescould have structure fires. The project site is also located approximately 1.4 miles from LosAngeles County Fire Station No. 129, located at 42110 6 th Street West, which would serve theproject site in the event of a fire. Therefore, potential impacts from wildland fires would be lessthan significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 33
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would theproject:a) Violate any water quality standards or waste dischargerequirements or otherwise substantially degrade surfaceor ground water quality? X
X
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interferesubstantially with groundwater recharge such that theproject may impede sustainable groundwatermanagement of the basin?c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of thesite or area, including through the alteration of thecourse of a stream or river or through the addition ofimpervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site X
Xii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surfacerunoff in a manner which would result in floodingon- or off-siteiii) Create or contribute runoff water which wouldexceed the capacity of existing or plannedstormwater drainage systems or provide substantialadditional sources of polluted runoff X
Xiv) Impede or redirect flood flowsd) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release ofpollutants due to project inundation? X
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a waterquality control plan or sustainable groundwatermanagement plan? X
a. The project site is not located in an area with an open body of water or in an aquifer rechargearea. The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable provisions of theNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. The NPDES programestablishes a comprehensive storm water quality program to manage urban storm water and 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 34minimize pollution of the environment to the maximum extent practicable. The reduction ofpollutants in urban storm water discharge through the use of structural and nonstructural BestManagement Practices (BMPs) is one of the primary objectives of the water quality regulations.BMPs that are typically used to management runoff water quality include controlling roadwayand parking lot contaminants by installing oil and grease separators at storm drain inlets, cleaningparking lots on a regular basis, incorporating peak-flow reduction and infiltration features (grassswales, infiltration trenches and grass filter strips) into landscaping and implementingeducational programs. The proposed project would incorporate appropriate BMPs duringconstruction, as determined by the City of Lancaster Development Services Department.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

The proposed project consists of the expansion of an existing R&D facility. The existingbuildings are already connected to sewer and the wastewater does not violate water qualitystandards or exceeds waste discharge requirements. The expansion consists of a newphotovoltaic solar array, new 55-foot tower, and ancillary equipment. These uses would not beconnected to the sewer and do no generate wastewater. Therefore, impacts would be less thansignificant. b.
c.

The proposed project would not include any groundwater wells or pumping activities. All watersupplied to the proposed project would be obtained from Los Angeles County WaterworksDistrict No. 40. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.Development the proposed project may increase the amount of surface runoff as a result ofimpervious surfaces associated with the additional equipment/tower and solar array on the site.The proposed project would be designed, on the basis of a hydrology study, to accept currentflows entering the property and to handle the additional incremental runoff from the developedsite. Therefore, impacts from drainage and runoff would be less than significant.

Portions of the project site are designated as Flood Zone X-Shaded and portions of the site aredesignated as Flood Zone A per LOMR 04-09-0375P (5/20/05) and LOMR 08-09-1958P(9/28/08) (FEMA Flood Map Service Center). Flood Zone X-Shaded is located outside of the100-year flood zone but within the 500-year flood zone. Zone A is located within a flood zone.However, no occupied buildings or structures are proposed on the project site and all structures(e.g., solar panels, tower, etc.) will be elevated so that they are out of the flood zone inaccordance with applicable regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d.
e.

The project site is not located within a coastal zone. Therefore, tsunamis are not a potentialhazard. The project site is relatively flat and does not contain any enclosed bodies of water and isnot located in close proximity to any other large bodies of water. Therefore, the proposed projectwould not be subject to inundation by seiches or mudflows. No impacts would occur.

The proposed project would not conflict or obstruct the implementation of the applicable waterquality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. For additional information seeresponses X.a through X.c. Impacts would be less than significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 35
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXI. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
X
X
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to aconflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulationadopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating anenvironmental effect? a.
b.

The proposed project consists of the expansion of R&D operations at an existing facility locatedat 431 East Avenue K-4 within the City’s Business Park. The proposed project would not block apublic street, trail, other access route, or result in a physical barrier that would divide thecommunity. Therefore, no impacts would occur.With implementation of mitigation measures listed throughout this document, the proposedproject is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Specific Plan No. 80-02 (Lancaster BusinessPark) and must be in conformance with the Lancaster Municipal Code. Table 6 provides aconsistency analysis of the proposed project with respect to the relevant policies of the GeneralPlan. The proposed project would be in compliance with the City-adopted Uniform BuildingCode (UBC) and erosion control requirements. Additionally, as noted in Section IV.f., the projectwould not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, NaturalCommunities Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservationplan. As the proposed project does not involve the provision of housing nor is housing permittedwithin the SP 80-02 zone except on limited parcels, a consistency analysis with the HousingElement was not conducted.

In addition to the City’s General Plan, the Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG) adopts a Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)every five years. On May 7, 2020 SCAG adopted the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, known as ConnectSoCal, for federal transportation conformity purposes only. On September 3, 2020, SCAGadopted Connect SoCal for all other purposes. The RTP/SCS identifies ten regional goals; thesegoals are identified in Table 7 along with the project’s consistency with these goals. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 36 Table 6General Plan Consistency AnalysisPolicies Consistency AnalysisPolicy 3.1.1: Ensure that development does not Consistent. The proposed project would not resultadversely affect the groundwater basin. in the pumping of groundwater as all water wouldbe supplied by District 40 and is currently beingsupplied.Policy 3.2.1: Promote the use of waterconservation measures in the landscape plans ofnew developments.Policy 3.2.5: Promote the use of waterconservation measures in the design of newdevelopments.

Consistent. No additional landscaping is proposedat the project site. Landscaping has already beeninstalled around the existing buildings, parking lotand perimeter. This landscaping was installedutilized native and drought tolerant plants or relieson plants that were previously planted and are wellestablished.

Policy 3.3.1: Minimize the amount of vehicularmiles traveled.

Consistent. The proposed project would generateminimal trips per day associated with the existingemployees on the project site. No additionalemployees would be required for the proposedproject and no increase in VMT would occur.Consistent. The construction and operation of theproposed project would generate minimal airemissions as identified in Section III. Theseemissions are well below the thresholds establishedby the AVAQMD.

Policy 3.3.3: Minimize air pollutant emissionsgenerated by new and existing development.

Policy 3.4.4: Ensure that development proposals, Consistent. The project site was previouslyincluding City sponsored projects, are analyzed for developed and does not contain any habitat forshort- and long-term impacts to biological sensitive or special status plant or animal species.resources and that appropriate mitigation measures The trees surrounding the project site would are implemented.
remain and continue to provide habitat for nestingbirds. No mitigation measures are necessary.Policy 3.6.4: Support state and federal legislation Consistent. The proposed project would work tothat would eliminate wasteful energy consumption develop processes for developing clean hydrogenin an appropriate manner. fuel and would support state and federal goalsregarding energy.Policy 4.3.1: Ensure that noise-sensitive land usesand noise generators are located and designed insuch a manner that City noise objectives will beachieved.

Consistent. A noise study was prepared for theproposed project which determined thatconstruction and operational noise levels would be less than significant. Additionally, bestmanagement practices for construction have beenidentified to ensure that noise levels duringconstruction are as low as possible.

Policy 4.3.2: Wherever feasible, manage thegeneration of single event noise levels (SENL)from motor vehicles, trains, aircraft, commercial,industrial, construction, and other activities suchthat SENL levels are no greater than 15 dBA abovethe noise objectives included in the Plan for PublicHealth and Safety.

Consistent. The noise levels associated withconstruction and operation of the proposed projectare consistent with the standards identified in theCity’s General Plan. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 37Policy 4.3.3: Ensure that the provision of noiseattenuation does not create significant negativevisual impacts.

Consistent. No noise attenuation is required forthe proposed project. The site is currently fencedwith perimeter trees which would remain withimplementation of the proposed project.

Policy 4.5.1: Ensure that activities within the Cityof Lancaster transport, use, store, and dispose of Consistent. The proposed project would use, store,transport and dispose of all hazardous materialshazardous materials in a responsible manner which and waste in accordance with all applicable rulesprotects the public health and safety. and regulations.Policy 4.7.2: Ensure that the design of newdevelopment minimizes the potential for fire.

Consistent. The proposed project will comply withall regulations to minimize fire during constructionand operation. Additionally, the project site iswithin the service boundaries of a Station No. 129which will provide response in the event of a fire.

Policy 16.1.1: Promote a jobs/housing balance that Consistent. While the proposed project would notplaces an emphasis on the attraction of high paying create any new jobs associated with its expansion;jobs which will enable the local workforce toachieve the standard of living necessary to bothlive and work within the community.Policy 16.6.1: Require new development toconstruct and/or pay for new on-site capitalimprovements necessitated by their project,consistent with performance criteria identified inObjective 15.1. the development of processes for the production ofhydrogen fuel will assist in the creation of a newlocal industry with new high paying jobs.Consistent. The proposed project would berequired to pay for all on site improvements. Nooff-site improvements are necessary as the projectsite is located in the urban core and surrounded byexisting development.

Table 7Connect SoCal Consistency AnalysisPolicies Consistency AnalysisGoal 1: Encourage regional economic prosperity Consistent. The proposed project would helpand global competitiveness support regional economic prosperity by workingto develop processes to create hydrogen fuel.Goal 2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability Consistent. The project site is located in closeand travel safety for people and goods proximity to the Antelope Valley Freeway whichwill facilitate the movement of employees to theproject site and the shipment of goods to and fromthe site.

Goal 3: Enhance the preservation, security, and Not Applicable. This goal is not applicable to theresilience of the regional transportation system. proposed project.Goal 4: Increase person and goods movement and Not Applicable. This goal is not applicable to thetravel choices within the transportation system. proposed project.Goal 5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and Consistent. The R&D activities associated with improve air quality. the proposed project will assist in developing thecreation of hydrogen fuels which will ultimatelyreduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve airquality.

Goal 6: Support health and equitable communities. Not Applicable. This goal is not applicable to theproposed project. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 38Goal 7: Adapt to a changing climate and support Consistent. The project would help to developan integrated regional development pattern and technologies to create low carbon transportationtransportation network. fuel. The goal of supporting an integrated regionaldevelopment pattern and transportation network isnot applicable to the proposed project.

Goal 8: Leverage new transportation technologies Not Applicable. This goal is not applicable to theand data-driven solutions that result in more proposed project.efficient travel.Goal 9: Encourage development of diverse housing Not Applicable. There is no housing associatedtypes in areas that are supported by multipletransportation options. with the proposed project. This goal is notapplicable to the proposed project.Goal 10: Promote conservation of natural andagricultural lands and restoration of habitats.

Not Applicable. This goal is not applicable to theproposed project. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 39
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineralresource that would be of value to the region and theresidents of the state? X
Xb) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-importantmineral resource recovery site delineated on a localgeneral plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a-b. The project site does not contain any mining or recovery operations for mineral resources and nosuch activities have occurred on the project site in the past. According to the LMEA (Figure 2-4and page 2-8), the project site is not designated as Mineral Reserve 3 (contains potential butpresently unproven resources). Additionally, it is not considered likely that the Lancaster area haslarge, valuable mineral and aggregate deposits. Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources wouldoccur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 40
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXIII. NOISE. Would the project:a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanentincrease in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of theproject in excess of standards established in the localgeneral plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standardsof other agencies? X
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration orgroundborne noise levels? X
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a privateairstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a planhas not been adopted, within two miles of a publicairport or public use airport, would the project exposepeople residing or working in the project area toexcessive noise levels? X
a. A noise study was prepared for the proposed project by SWCA Environmental Consultants anddocumented in a report entitled “Noise and Ground Vibration Technical Report, Lancaster SolarR&D Project, Los Angeles County, California” and dated November 2022. This noise studyanalyzed the construction and operational noise levels associated with the proposed project inaddition to the potential for vibration noise impacts. The assumptions for the noise levels arecontained within the noise study.

Estimates of construction noise were based on the maximum of construction equipment used ona given day. The approximate noise generated by the construction equipment used at the facilitywas conservatively calculated and does not consider further attenuation due to atmosphericinterference or intervening structures.Construction is transient in nature and noise levels vary depending on the activity in progress.Noise impacts to residents in the vicinity of the site due to the construction of the proposedproject would be temporary and intermittent. Additionally, the noise levels were estimated topresent a conservative impact analysis, assuming all pieces of equipment operate simultaneously.Furthermore, the model assumes that construction noise is constant when construction activitiesare periodic and change throughout the day. Estimated noise levels from construction activities atthe closest sensitive receptor from the center of the construction site were estimated to beapproximately 74.1 dBA Leq and 76.8 dBA Lmax. Therefore, without mitigation, noise impactsassociated with the construction activities for the project would be less than significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 41However, best management practices have been identified in order to reduce construction noiseas much as possible.During operation, the primary noise sources would be the heliostat trackers, blowers, and thehydrogen storage/dispensing system. All equipment sound levels were estimated based onavailable data from the equipment manufacturers or obtained from other sources. The calculatednoise levels emitted by the project would be below the City of Lancaster General Plan noiserestrictions for residential uses (e.g., 65 dBA) at all residential receptors. Noise contributions tothe surrounding environment are low and estimated at 49.3 dBA Leq at the nearest sensitivereceptor. Therefore, operational noise levels would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures5. Construction operations shall not occur between 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays or Saturdayor at any time on Sunday. The hours of any construction-related activities shall be restrictedto periods and days permitted by local ordinance.6. The on-site construction supervisor shall have the responsibility and authority to receive andresolve noise complaints. A clear appeal process to the owner shall be established prior toconstruction commencement that will allow for resolution of noise problems that cannot beimmediately solved by the site supervisor.7. Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustionpowered equipment, where feasible.8. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking and maintenance areas shall belocated as far away as practicable from noise-sensitive receptors.9. The use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells shall be forsafety warning purposes only.10. No project-related public address or music system shall be audible at any adjacent receptor.All noise producing construction equipment and vehicles using internal combustion enginesshall be equipped with mufflers, air-inlet silencers where appropriate, and any other shrouds,shields, or other noise-reducing features in good operating condition that meet or exceedoriginal factor specifications. Mobile or fixed "package" equipment (e.g., arc-welders, aircompressors, etc.) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readilyavailable for the type of equipment. b. The noise and vibration study referenced in XIII.a, also included a vibration analysis for bothbuilding damage and human annoyance during construction. The significance threshold forbuilding damage ranged between 0.2 and 0.3 inches per second depending upon the type ofbuilding construction. Five off-site buildings ranging from 228 to 840 feet away from the projectsite were analyzed. The estimated vibration velocity at these buildings ranged from 0.0009 to0.0032 inches per second. These levels are well below the threshold and impacts would be lessthan significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 42With respect to human annoyance, the significance is 80 VdB. The same off-site receptors thatwere utilized for the building damage analysis were utilized for the human annoyance analysis.The annoyance levels at these receptors ranged from 41 to 58 VdB, which is also below thesignificance threshold. As such, all vibration impacts from construction would be less thansignificant. c. The project site is not in proximity to an airport or a frequent overflight area and would notexperience noise from these sources. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 43
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in anarea, either directly (for example, by proposing newhomes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people orhousing, necessitating the construction of replacementhousing elsewhere? X
a.
b.

The proposed project is not anticipated to result in an incremental increase in population growth;however, any potential increase was anticipated in both the City's General Plan and in theSouthern California Association of Government's (SCAG's) most recent Regional TransportationPlan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Additionally, while it is unlikely thatindividuals involved in the construction of the proposed project would come from the AntelopeValley any increase in population would contribute, on an incremental basis, to the population ofthe City. As such, impacts would be less than significant.

The project site is currently vacant. No housing or people would be displaced necessitating theconstruction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 44
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXV. PUBLIC SERVICES.a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physicalimpacts associated with the provision of new orphysically altered governmental facilities, need for newor physically altered governmental facilities, theconstruction of which could cause significantenvironmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptableservice ratios, response times or other performanceobjectives for any of the public services:

Fire Protection?
Police Protection?
Schools?
X
X
X
X
X
Parks?Other Public Facilities?
a. The proposed project may increase the need for fire and police services during construction andoperation; however, the project site is within the current service area of both these agencies andthe additional time and cost to service the sites is minimal. The proposed project would notinduce substantial population growth and therefore, would not increase the demand on parks orother public facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Construction of the proposed project is not likely to result in an incremental increase inpopulation (see Item XIII) as no increase in the number of employees would occur. However, ifan increase in the number of students were to occur as a result of the proposed project in theLancaster School District and Antelope Valley Union High School District. Proposition 1A,which governs the way in which school funding is carried out, predetermines by statute thatpayment of developer fees is adequate mitigation for school impacts. Therefore, impacts wouldbe less than significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 45
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXVI. RECREATION. Would the project:a) Would the project increase the use of existingneighborhood and regional parks or other recreationalfacilities such that substantial physical deterioration ofthe facility would occur or be accelerated? X
X
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or requirethe construction or expansion of recreational facilitieswhich might have an adverse physical effect on theenvironment? a-b. The proposed project would not generate additional population growth and would not contributeon an incremental basis to the use of the existing park and recreational facilities as no new jobswould be created during operation and it is not likely that individuals would move to theAntelope Valley for the construction of a small project. Additionally, the applicant would berequired to pay park fees which would offset the impacts of the existing parks. The developmentof the proposed project would not require the construction of new recreational facilities or theexpansion of existing ones. Therefore, no impacts to recreation would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 46
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXVII. TRANSPORTATION. Would the project:a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policyaddressing the circulation system, including transit,roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? X
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent withCEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric designfeature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) orincompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X
Xd) Result in inadequate emergency access?
a.
b.

The proposed project would not conflict with or impede any of the General Plan policies orspecific actions related to alternative modes of transportation (Lancaster General Plan pgs. 5-18to 5-24.) Therefore, no impacts would occur.In July 2020, the City of Lancaster adopted standards and thresholds for analyzing projects withrespect to vehicle miles traveled (VMT). A series of screening criteria were adopted and if aproject meets one of these criteria, a VMT analysis is not required. These criteria are: 1) projectsite - generates fewer than 110 trips per day; 2) locally serving retail - commercial developmentsof 50,000 square feet or smaller; 3) project located in a low VMT area- 15% below baseline; 4)transit proximity; 5) affordable housing; and 6) transportation facilities.

The proposed project is anticipated to generate minimal trips per day from the current employeeson the site. These trips are already occurring and no new jobs would be created as a result of theproposed project. As no new trips would be generated, and there are only a handful of employeeson site, the trips generated per day would be is below the screening threshold of 110 trips perday. As such, a VMT analysis is not required and impacts would be less than significant. c.
d.

The roadways in the vicinity of the project site are already improved and can adequately handleany traffic generated by the project. No roadway improvements are necessary and no hazardousroadway conditions would by the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts would occur.The project site would have adequate emergency access from Division Street, Avenue K-4,Avenue K, and 5th Street East. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 47
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would theproject:a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change inthe significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined inPublic Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site,feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographicallydefined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place, or object with cultural value to a CaliforniaNative American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Registerof Historical Resources, or in a local register ofhistorical resources as defined in Public ResourcesCode Section 5020.1(k), or X
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in itsdiscretion and supported by substantial evidence, tobe significant pursuant to criteria set for insubdivision (c) of Public Resources Section 5024.1.In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) ofPublic Resource Code Section 5024.1, the leadagency shall consider the significance of theresource to a California Native American tribe. a. No cultural resources are present on the site and no tribal cultural resources were identifiedduring the AB 52 process. One tribe responded to the AB 52 letters and stated that they wouldnot be requesting consultation. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 48
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would theproject:a) Require or result in the relocation or construction or newor expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm waterdrainage, electric power, natural gas, or X X
telecommunications facilities, the construction orrelocation of which could cause significantenvironmental effects?b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve theproject and reasonably foreseeable future developmentduring normal, dry and multiple dry years?c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatmentprovider which serves or may serve the project that ithas adequate capacity to serve the project’s projecteddemand in addition to the provider’s existingcommitments? X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or localstandards, or in excess of the capacity of localinfrastructure, or otherwise impact the attainment ofsolid waste reduction goals? X
Xe) Comply with federal, state, and local management andreduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a. The proposed project is already connected into the existing utilities such as electricity, naturalgas, water, wastewater, telecommunications, etc. Any additional connections necessary wouldoccur on the project site or within existing roadways or right-of-way. Connections to theseutilities are assumed as part of the proposed project and impacts to environmental resources havebeen discussed throughout the document. As such, impacts would be less than significant. b.
c.

The Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 40 has not indicated any problems insupplying water to the proposed project from existing facilities. No new construction of watertreatment or new or expanded entitlements would be required. Therefore, water impacts would beless than significant.The existing buildings on the project site are already connected to the sanitary sewer and arereceiving service from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. No additional sewer2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 49connections would be required and no additional wastewater would be generated. As such, noimpacts would occur.d-e. Solid waste generated within the City limits is generally disposed of at the Lancaster Landfilllocated at 600 East Avenue F. This landfill is a Class III landfill which accepts agricultural,nonfriable asbestos, construction/demolition waste, contaminated soil, green materials, industrial,inert, mixed municipal, sludge, and waste tires. It does not accept hazardous materials. AssemblyBill (AB) 939 was adopted in 1989 and required a 25% diversion of solid waste from landfills by1995 and a 50% diversion by 2005. ln 2011, AB 341 was passed which requires the State toachieve a 75% reduction in solid waste by 2030. The City of Lancaster also requires alldevelopments to have trash collection services in accordance with City contracts with wastehaulers over the life of the proposed project. These collection services would also collectrecyclable materials and organics. The trash haulers are required to be in compliance withapplicable regulations on solid waste transport and disposal, including waste stream reductionmandated under AB 341.

The proposed project would generate solid waste during construction and operation, which wouldcontribute to an overall impact on landfill service (GPEIR pgs. 5.9-20 to 21); although theproject's contribution is considered minimal. However, the existing landfill has capacity tohandle the waste generated by the project. Additionally, the proposed project would be incompliance with all State and local regulations regulating solid waste disposal. Therefore, impactwould less than significant. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 50
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibilityareas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severityzones, would the project:a) Substantially impact an adopted emergency responseplan or emergency evacuation plan? X
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,exacerbate wildlife risks, and thereby expose projectoccupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire orthe uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associatedinfrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergencywater sources, power lines or other utilities) that mayexacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary orongoing impacts to the environment? X
X
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,including downslope or downstream flooding orlandslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slopeinstability, or drainage changes? a. See Item IX.f.b-d. The project site is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very highfire hazard severity zones. The project site is located within the service boundaries of Fire StationNo. 129, located at 42110 6 th Street West, which can adequately serve the project site. Other firestations are also located in close proximity to the project site which can provide service ifneeded. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 51
Less ThanSignificantWith
PotentiallySignificantImpact
Less ThanSignificantImpact
NoImpactMitigationXXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.a) Does the project have the potential to substantiallydegrade the quality of the environment, substantiallyreduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause afish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaininglevels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animalcommunity, substantially reduce the number or restrictthe range of a rare or endangered plant or animal oreliminate important examples of the major periods ofCalifornia history or prehistory? X
b) Does the project have impacts that are individuallylimited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulativeconsiderable” means that the incremental effects of aproject are considerable when viewed in connectionwith the effects of past projects, the effects of othercurrent projects, and the effects of probable futureprojects)? X
c) Does the project have environmental effects which willcause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly? X
a. The proposed project consists of the expansion of the existing R&D operations at the Heliogenfacility located at 431 East Avenue K-4 in the SP 80-02 zone. Other projects have been submittedwithin approximately one mile of the project site (Table 8). These projects are also required to bein accordance with the City's zoning code and General Plan. Cumulative impacts are the changein the environment, which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to otherclosely related past, present and reasonably foreseeable projects.

The proposed project would not create any impacts with respect to: Agriculture and ForestryResources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy Resources, Land Use and Planning,Mineral Resources, Recreation, Tribal Resources and Wildfire. The project would create impactsto other resource areas and mitigation measures have identified for Air Quality, Geology andSoils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Noise. Many of the impacts generated by projectsare site specific and generally do not influence the impacts on another site. All projects undergoenvironmental review and have required mitigation measures to reduce impacts when warranted.These mitigation measures reduce environmental impacts to less than significant levelswhenever possible. All impacts associated with the proposed project are less than significant withthe exception of air quality, geology and soils (soil erosion), hazards and hazardous materials, and 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 52noise. Impacts associated with these issues are less than significant with the incorporation of theidentified mitigation measures. Therefore, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts wouldnot be cumulatively considerable.Table 8Related Projects ListCaseNo. Location APNs DescriptionCannabis facility StatusApproved
CUP Forbes St & Enterprise 3128-008-02520-04 ParkwaySPR Bounded by 6th St W, 3128-013-012, -001, 6 MW photovoltaic solar Approvedfacility21-01 4th St W, Ave L-8, and 002, -004, -013, -014;Ave MNWC Division & Ave 3128-010-0263128-012-004
SPR 7,000 sf warehouse, 2,000 sf Approvedoffice20-07 L-9SPR Valleyline Road, north 3126-019-03419-04 of Avenue L-12 22,000 sf cannabismanufacturing andcultivation
In Review
CUP 742 & 752 Ave L; 3128-009-006, -083, - Cannabis cultivation and18-27 42650 8th St W 084, -100 manufacturing facilitySPR South of Ave L, 600 3128-007-034, -039 28,895 sf warehouse facility In Review Approved
22-02 west of Sierra HighwaySPR22-03 & Ave LSPR
SWC Sierra Highway 3128-007-030, 3128- 93,465 sf self-storage In Review In Review
In Review
007-038 facility6th Street West, south 3128-020-015 2 steel buildings for multi-tenant use22-07 of Avenue L-8SPR22-11/TPM83994SPR22-14 StreetSPR22-16 Avenue L-8CUP Market and Enterprise22-16 Forbes St & Market St 3128-008-009 2 industrial bldgs totaling229,500 sf Avenue L-4 & Wall 3128-007-015, -024
3128-020-014
217,700 sf tilt up industrialbldg15,000 sf industrial bldg.

In Review
In Review
In Review
6th Street West and 3128-008-017 11,296 sf cannabis facility 2019 Update

Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11Initial StudyPage 53List of Referenced Documents and Available Locations*:AIR:

ESA:

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report, LancasterSolar R&D Project, Los Angeles County, California, SWCAEnvironmental Consultants, September 2022Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the HeliogenLancaster Test Site in Los Angeles County, California, SWCAEnvironmental Consultants, August 2022Flood Insurance Rate MapLancaster General Plan Environmental Impact ReportLancaster General PlanLancaster Municipal CodeLancaster Master Environmental AssessmentNoise and Ground Vibration Technical Report, Lancaster SolarR&D Project, Los Angeles County, California, SWCAEnvironmental Consultants, November 2022State Seismic Hazard Zone Maps DSD

DSDDSDDSDDSDDSDDSD
FIRM:GPEIR:LGP:LMC:LMEA:NOI: DSDDSDDSD
SSHZ:USGS:

United States Geological Survey MapsUSDA SCS: United States Department of AgricultureSoil Conservation Service Maps DSD* DSD: Development Services DepartmentCommunity Development DivisionLancaster City Hall44933 Fern AvenueLancaster, California 93534 2019 Update

Amy R. Higuera
[email protected]
415.848.4836 Direct
415.848.4801 Fax
Downey Brand LLP
455 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94105
415.848.4800 Main
downeybrand.com

June 9, 2023
Via Electronic Mail

City of Lancaster City Council
c/o City Clerk
44933 Fern Avenue
Lancaster, CA 93534

Re: Heliogen, Inc.’s Response to Appeal of the City of Lancaster Planning Commission’s March 20, 2023 Approval of the Heliogen Research and Development Facility Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11 and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

Dear Mayor Parris and City Council Members:

On behalf of Heliogen, Inc. (Heliogen), this letter responds to the Appeal submitted by Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo on behalf of an entity calling itself Citizens for Responsible Industry (Appellant) of the City of Lancaster (City) Planning Commission’s March 20, 2023 approval of the Heliogen Research and Development Facility (Project) Conditional Use Permit No. 22-11 and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).

The following addresses the various points made in the Appeal, including a letter from Appellant dated March 31, 2023, as well as March 9 and March 20, 2023 comment letters submitted by Appellant, with attached letters from Dr. Phyllis Fox, Scott Cashen, and Ani Toncheva. For the reasons discussed herein, Appellant has not identified any fair argument supported by substantial evidence that the Project would cause any significant environmental impacts. We therefore respectfully request that the City Council deny the Appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s approval of the Project and the IS/MND.

I. The Arguments Raised in the Appeal are Meritless.
a. The concerns raised in the Appeal are adequately addressed in the IS/MND.

The City prepared and circulated for public review an IS/MND to analyze the proposed minor expansion of the existing Heliogen Research and Development facility in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As described in the Planning Commission staff report and the IS/MND, the Project would expand the existing facilities to include additional testing operations for development of technologies to support the production of hydrogen fuel. The Project would add a 55-foot tower, approximately 400 solar panels, and hydrogen testing equipment to the already developed site During the public review period four comment letters were received, including one from the Antelope Valley Air Quality

June 9, 2023

Management District (AVAQMD), California Department of Transportation, a member of the public, and Appellant. Appellant submitted a second letter less than an hour before the start of the Planning Commission meeting on March 20, 2023. City staff reviewed the comment letters, including the late-submitted letter from Appellant, and determined no issues had been raised that would require revision or recirculation of the IS/MND. Nor had any comments raised a fair argument supported by substantial evidence of a significant impact requiring preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) under CEQA.
b. Decommissioning is not part of the proposed Project and any potential impacts are speculative.

Appellant argues there are potential impacts that could result from decommissioning the Project, based on a question raised by a member of the Planning Commission during its consideration of the Project. Appellant now demands a decommissioning plan with various components, including timelines and a financing mechanism, for the proposed Project.

No decommissioning plan for the Project is proposed or being approved at this time. That the Project may eventually be decommissioned does not oblige Heliogen to draft such a plan at this stage, any more than construction of a building obliges the developer to plan its demolition.1 Even if decommissioning the Project at some future point 25-30 years in the future was a certainty, which it is not, decommissioning details have not been developed and the regulatory setting in which that would occur is unknown. Any alleged decommissioning impacts would be entirely speculative and cannot be meaningfully evaluated in the IS/MND at this time.2 Further, under the terms of Heliogen’s lease agreement with the City, at the end of the Project’s life, Heliogen is required to leave all equipment on site for the City’s use unless the City requests that the equipment be removed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable laws. Thus, no decommissioning plan is required by the lease at this time. Nor has a decision yet been made as

1 Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 326, 348- 350 [finding that future extension of groundwater pumping beyond the project’s 50-year term “far too speculative to require environmental analysis at this point.”].

2 Citizens' Committee to Complete the Refuge v. City of Newark (2021) 74 Cal.App.5th 460, 479 [City not required to analyze impacts of adaptive pathways as part of project because it “currently [could] only guess what measures [would] be needed to respond to conditions several generations from now”], citing to Environmental Council of Sacramento v. County of Sacramento (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 1020, 1031 [“CEQA does not require an EIR to discuss future developments which are unspecified or uncertain. Such an analysis would be based on speculation about future environmental impact.”] (internal quotations omitted); Friends of the Sierra Railroad v. Tuolumne Park & Recreation Dist. (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 643, 659-660 [“We do not think CEQA compels public agencies, or empowers petitioners, to force property owners to create or disclose development plans for the purpose of accelerating environmental review”].

June 9, 2023

to whether decommissioning will ultimately be required of Heliogen. No further analysis is required.
c. The environmental setting is accurately described in the IS/MND.

Appellant asserts that the IS/MND failed to adequately analyze the environmental setting, resulting in an inaccurate analysis of impacts, including those related to noise and biological resources. However, Appellant identifies no facts or subjects that were omitted from the IS/MND’s relevant discussions. To the extent Appellant argues that the impact analysis needed to include the existing conditions, those arguments related to air quality, noise, and biological resources are addressed below in sections I.e., I.g., and I.h.

The IS/MND includes a discussion of the existing setting, including the fact that the Project site is within the boundaries of the City’s Business Park and is the former location of the City’s Golf Center and Driving Range. (IS/MND, p. 6.) Additional information is provided under the discussion of each resource area, as relevant to allow analysis of potential impacts. The technical studies prepared in support of the IS/MND also provide detailed information regarding existing conditions. Nothing further is required.
3 d. The Project description is accurate and complete.

Appellant argues that the IS/MND did not adequately analyze the Project’s environmental setting by failing to incorporate additional development of the site over the next ten years, resulting in alleged piecemealing. Specifically, Appellant asserts that the “full scope of the Project” includes development of a pipeline to transport approximately three million barrels of fuel over ten years.

Contrary to Appellant’s assertion, the Research and Development facility would not be used for commercial hydrogen production. Appellant appears to refer to Heliogen’s forecast for potential development of a commercial hydrogen facility at some point in the future. No plans for that potential project are currently proposed with the City. If and when they are, that will be a separate project, on a separate site, with independent utility, and will require separate entitlements. It is not part of the Project at issue here and no piecemealing has occurred.4 Appellant has also argued the IS/MND inadequately describes the proposed 55-foot tower because it does not state the tower’s purpose or use. It further alleges that information about the tower’s use is necessary to analyze the scope of the Project’s impacts.

3 CEQA Guidelines, § 15063(d) [an IS need only contain in “brief form” a description of the project including the location of the project and an identification of the environmental setting]; see also, Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa Cruz (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1170, 1192 [upheld “brief description of the existing physical conditions” in an IS].

4 Paulek v. Dept. of Water Resources (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 35, 45-47 [no piecemealing where the second activity is not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the first activity]; see also Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino, supra.

June 9, 2023

The tower structure would support the purpose of the proposed Project, which is to perform research, development, and demonstration of concentrated solar power technologies to produce green hydrogen. Specifically, the tower would house receivers and ancillary equipment to support these research and development efforts. The IS/MND includes the tower as a project component in the Project Description and states it would support the expanded research and development uses on the Site.5 Because the tower is disclosed as a project component, its construction and operation was assumed in the overall analysis of the Project’s impacts throughout the IS/MND.

Though Appellant has suggested that its consultants express concerns over this issue, that is not the case. The referenced comments of its consultants do not actually address the tower and instead relate to the ground-mounted panels, and alleged impacts associated with the washing of solar panels, as well as alleged impacts of the solar panels related to biological resources and noise. None of these comments from Appellant’s consultants relate to the tower component of the proposed Project, nor have Appellant’s consultants suggested that potential impacts depend on the tower’s purpose. Nothing further is required in the IS/MND project description. e. Air quality and public health impacts are fully analyzed.

1. Existing environmental conditions are not part of the Project’s impacts.

Appellant asserts that PM2.5 and PM10 emissions from “graded but undeveloped portions of the Projects [sic] site are significant and unmitigated.” Appellant essentially argues that the existing conditions on the site, from areas not proposed for development as part of the Project, pose potential environmental impacts.

CEQA generally does not require an analysis of how existing environmental conditions will impact a project’s future users or residents, unless the project would exacerbate those existing hazards.6 Neither Appellant nor its consultant, Dr. Fox, provide any evidence that this limited Project will exacerbate PM2.5 and PM10 emissions.

Existing conditions are the baseline for the proposed expansion, which includes the existing facility, and all activities that have previously occurred on the site. To the extent Appellant argues that CEQA compliance for the initial site development was inadequate, the statute of limitations for that argument has long-since expired.
7 CEQA does not require mitigation for
existing conditions or the impacts of prior projects.

5 IS/MND, p. 2.

6 California Building Industry Assn. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 386

7 CEQA Guidelines, § 15112(c).

June 9, 2023

2. Valley Fever impacts are sufficiently mitigated.

Similarly, Appellant and Dr. Fox allege that the incorporated dust control mitigation is insufficient to reduce risks related to Valley Fever because such mitigation has been demonstrated to be ineffective in reducing very fine particles where Valley Fever spores are found.

Dr. Fox relies on two case studies from San Luis Obispo County. However, Dr. Fox quotes descriptions of workers at those sites “working in a dust cloud or dust storm, and operating heavy equipment without enclosed cabs, closed windows, and air-conditioned with high- efficiency particle (HEPA) filtration.” Here, the air quality mitigation measure to address Valley Fever expressly requires a dust management plan to include HEP-filters and enclosed cabs. 8 As
such, it ensures that the Valley Fever risks are not significant, and the mitigation included in the IS/MND need not be altered. Further, the Conditions of Approval related to Valley Fever impacts mirror the mitigation measures included in the IS/MND. As such, Dr. Fox’s concerns are expressly addressed by the mitigation.

Further, as made clear during the Planning Commission meeting, the Valley Fever mitigation measure was written specifically for the City of Lancaster and developed by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the Los Angeles Department of Health, and has been included in all development projects in Lancaster since its development. Dr. Fox urges that measures developed for other jurisdictions be incorporated, but provides no evidence that the existing mitigation is insufficient.

As explained in more detail in the SWCA letter submitted to the City on May 5, 2023 in response to the Appeal, measures included in AVAQMD District Rule 403 include the submission and approval of a Dust Control Plan, which would minimize impacts due to Valley Fever. Mitigation Measure 2 requires the implementation of dust control measures in compliance with Rule 403, along with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1, which would provide personal protective respiratory equipment to construction workers along with information about Valley Fever to all construction personnel and visitors. 9 The risk of exposure
to Valley Fever would be minimized to a less than significant level through these measures.

3. Appellant fails to present substantial evidence of a fair argument concerning construction health risk impacts from exposure to pesticides.

Appellant and Dr. Fox claim that the site is contaminated with pesticides from agricultural use and that the Project may disturb these contaminants, leading to significant health risks for nearby persons. Appellant has also claimed that the IS/MND failed to use California’s Pesticide Use Reporting’s database to identify the specific pesticides historically used on the Site.

8 IS/MND, p. 19.

9 IS/MND, pp. 8 [Air Quality Mitigation Measure 1], 26 [Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure 2].

June 9, 2023

There is no requirement that California’s Pesticide Use Reporting’s database be surveyed in a CEQA document,10 nor does Appellant make any argument that the IS/MND’s existing description is inadequate. Appellant also provides no evidence that would support such an argument. The Phase I Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project established that the Site has not been used for agricultural purposes since the 1990s.11 The EA also found no recognized environmental conditions for the Site.12 Additionally, Project implementation would not result in the use of pesticides for agricultural purposes. Thus, the IS/MND’s analysis is adequate.

Finally, Appellant argues that the City should have done further study because such contamination might have been discovered. However, dire predictions unsupported by facts are not substantial evidence supporting a fair argument of a potential impact.13

4. The generation of hyrdogen poses no potentially significant air quality impacts.

Appellant and Dr. Fox assert that there is insufficient information about the process used to generate hydrogen to accurately evaluate the Project’s operational impacts. Not so. As identified in the IS/MND and reiterated in the May 5, 2023 SWCA letter, there are no air emissions anticipated from the operation of the facility itself (i.e., stationary sources), and emissions from the Fischer Tropsch process and hydrogen distribution would be negligible and well below the thresholds of significance set by the AVAQMD.14 Therefore the evaluation of operational air emissions in the IS/MND is adequate.

5. The washing of solar panels poses no potentially significant air quality impacts.

Appellant and Dr. Fox suggest that washing the solar panels will create significant and unmitigated environmental impacts. Again, they fail to provide any substantial evidence to support such a position.

During project operations, emissions would result from the occasional use of on-site off-road equipment (aerial lift and forklift) and the routine cleaning of the mirrors, but would not expose

10 CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials.

11 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Heliogen Lancaster Test Site in Los Angeles County, California (Aug. 2022) p. 10.

12 Id. at p. 12.

13 CEQA Guidelines, § 15384 [“Argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence which is clearly erroneous or inaccurate . . . does not constitute substantial evidence.”].

14 See SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, pp. 2 [Table 1: Unmitigated Construction and Operation Emissions Summary], 4.

June 9, 2023

sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of air pollutants.15 The cleaning of the mirrors was included in the IS/MND’s technical study, which accounted for the required amount of water per year.16 The panel washing vehicle is electric, so there will be no emissions associated with its use. While the vehicle does not use water most of the time it operates, the areas in which the panels will be installed will not be mass graded (per AVAQMD requirements) and therefore, existing vegetation should help to stabilize the ground over which the vehicle drives and prevent dust. During operations, daily employee and routine maintenance activities would not require additional workers, and any trips associated with hydrogen distribution would fall below the applicable screening threshold of 110 trips per day.17 Appellant’s claims otherwise amount to pure speculation.

6. The IS/MND’s analysis of grading impacts and related underlying data are sufficient.

Appellant argued in its March 9, 2023 comment letter that the IS/MND failed to provide all of the information underlying its analysis of air quality impacts resulting from grading. Appellant claimed that the City of Lancaster denied its Public Records Act Request for documents relating to the underlying CalEEMod calculations and failed to provide various information concerning the calculations (e.g., construction schedule).

CalEEMod calculations were provided by the City immediately upon request. The attached SWCA Environmental Consultants May 5, 2023 letter (SWCA letter) presents additional information regarding its Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report (2022 Report) and includes an attachment (Attachment A), which provides the assumptions regarding the Project’s equipment, schedule, and emissions. These assumptions are conservative and result in emissions well below AVAQMD thresholds of significance.18 Table 7 of the 2022 Report provides an estimate of the maximum number of pieces of equipment for the single phase, as well as conservative estimate operating hours.19 The SWCA letter also makes clear that, while mitigation was not included in the CalEEMod model because of the very low unmitigated emissions and conservative assumptions, mitigation would be included as part of the Project.

AVAQMD Rule 403 – Fugitive Dust would apply to the Project, as established in the 2022

15 SWCA Environmental Consultants (Sept. 2022) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report, p. 25.

16 Id. at pp. 4, 22.

17 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 4.

18 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, pp. 1-2.

19 SWCA Environmental Consultants (Sept. 2022) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report, p. 22 [Table 7: Construction Anticipated Equipment].

June 9, 2023

Report.20 Also, as required by Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations, idling times would be minimized either by requiring equipment be shut off when not in use or by reducing the maximum idling time to five (5) minutes with clear signage provided for construction workers at all access points.21
As explained in further detail in the SWCA May 5, 2023 letter, all of these best management practices and AVAQMD guidelines would further reduce the emissions reported in the 2022 Report.22 Heliogen would be required to comply with all AVAQMD grading and/or construction permits, including all prerequisites outlined in District Rule 403 - Fugitive Dust, including submission and approval of a Dust Control Plan, installation of signage, and the completion of a successful onsite compliance inspection by an AVAQMD field inspector.23 Proof of compliance would be submitted to the City of Lancaster, further ensuring any Project activities causing grading and dust would be in full compliance with all requirements and minimize air impacts.24 Additionally, the Planning Commission made clear during its meeting that mass grading for the installation of solar panels is not allowed and would not occur as part of this Project.

Appellant, referencing Fox’s report, alleges there will be various impacts from already-graded areas (e.g., from wind erosion until the Project build out is finished). Again, the existing environmental conditions of a project site constitute the baseline physical conditions from which project impacts are determined.25 The IS/MND and SWCA May 5, 2023 letter establish the Project site’s former use was a golf course, and thus the site has been graded and disturbed prior to this Project.26 Therefore, the existing grading on the site is considered a part of the Project’s baseline physical condition, which serves as the basis for evaluating the Project’s potential environmental impacts.27 The MND is not required to evaluate or mitigate for impacts that may have occurred with previous grading. Also, the Conditions of Approval list a variety of actions

20 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 2.

21 Id. at p. 3.

22 Ibid.

23 Ibid.

24 Ibid.

25 CEQA Guidelines, § 15125 [“[g]enerally, the lead agency should describe physical environmental conditions as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published”].

26 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 4.

27 Ibid.

June 9, 2023

the Applicant must take to avoid impacts related to drainage and grading. Appellant does not present a fair argument concerning grading impacts.

7. A Health Risk Assessment is not required and construction health risk impacts are adequately addressed.

Appellant and Dr. Fox argue that a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should have been prepared to address potentially significant impacts to sensitive receptors from toxic air contaminants (TACs).

The argument focuses on two claims: (1) the IS/MND’s analysis relies on the statement that construction health risks would be less than significant because “there will be minimal heavy equipment operations,”28 but even minimal heavy equipment must still be evaluated; and (2) the IS/MND inappropriately relies on the brief duration of construction, though even short-term exposure to TACs, such as diesel particulate matter, can be acutely toxic.

As made clear in SWCA’s May 5, 2023 letter, a HRA was not prepared here because it is not warranted by the Project’s minimal construction and operational emissions.29 The SWCA letter explains that the analysis in the IS/MND was based on conservative assumptions, and even under those assumptions the total construction diesel particulate matter is 0.63 pounds per day, making up 36% of the total PM10 and 0.8% of the particulate matter AVAQMD significance threshold.30 Toxic air pollutants from the Project would consist of diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions during construction activities, but would be minimal.31 Employees commuting to the Project site during construction or operation would use electric or gasoline-fueled vehicles.32 Unlike facilities such as dry cleaners, the Project does not qualify as one with health risk concerns to nearby sensitive receptors, per the 2016 AVAQMD CEQA and Federal Conformity Guidelines.33 It is a small research and development facility that would result in minimal amounts of diesel particulate matter and no operational stationary sources with toxic air contaminant emissions.34 Further, as stated in the SWCA May 5, 2023 letter, best management practices, like limiting

28 Though Dr. Fox cites the IS/MND itself, the statement quoted is from the SWCA Environmental Consultants (Sept. 2022) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report, p.

27. 29 See SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, pp. 2 [Table 1: Unmitigated Construction and Operation Emissions Summary], 4.

30 Id. at p. 4.

31 Id. at pp. 4-5.

32 Id. at p. 4.

33 Id. at pp. 4-5.

34 Ibid.

June 9, 2023

idling time, will be required of the Project, but were not assumed in the emissions estimates.

Such conservative assumptions mean that actual emissions will be even less than analyzed in the IS/MND and the analysis is therefore conservative.

The small construction-related emissions would be short-term and at different locations within the Project site.35 No individual receptor would be exposed to substantial pollution concentrations due to the limited duration and quantities of construction emissions.36 Finally, material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging and parking and maintenance areas would be located as far away as practicable from residences, further minimizing air impacts.37 Thus, the IS/MND concludes the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.38 Appellant has not raised a fair argument of substantial evidence to the contrary.

8. The CalEEMod assumptions are reasonable and need not be altered.

Appellant has also previously argued in its March 9, 2023 comment letter that the assumptions made in the CalEEMod air quality modeling were improper. Specifically, Appellant maintained that an assumption that construction equipment would have the same emissions as the statewide average construction fleet was unreasonable. Appellant argues that the IS/MND must make this a legal obligation for it to be a reasonable assumption. Again, Appellant is incorrect.

A lead agency may make reasonable assumptions in evaluating the potential impacts of a proposed Project.39 Appellant fails to show how this assumption is not reasonable. Additionally, as discussed in more detail in SWCA’s letter, the Project would be required to comply with applicable diesel control measures.40 Thus, Appellant’s position that the assumption is unreasonable has no factual support.
f. Appellant has not presented substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that hazardous materials mitigation is insufficient.

Appellant and Dr. Fox argue that the IS/MND’s conclusion that hazards are mitigated to a less than significant level is unsupported. Specifically, Dr. Fox cites studies showing that hydrogen

35 Id. at p. 5.

36 Ibid.

37 Ibid.; see also IS/MND, p. 41 [Noise Mitigation Measure 8].

38 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 5.

39 CEQA Guidelines, § 15144 [preparing an EIR or negative declaration necessarily involves some degree of forecasting].

40 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 3.

June 9, 2023

“can easily cause material failure” and that hydrogen explosions represent a considerable hazard.

Fox also states that a “risk of upset analysis” should have been undertaken. However, Appellant failed to provide any evidence that the mitigation related to hazardous materials is insufficient.

The applicable mitigation here is in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. 41 The
IS/MND’s analysis acknowledges that hydrogen generally poses risks and requires Heliogen to secure all necessary permits from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, AVAQMD, and other applicable agencies.42 As stated during the Planning Commission meeting, to the extent that hazardous materials are utilized or made on site Heliogen would be required to comply with all existing regulations and permitting requirements, and there is nothing unique about the disposition of the types of materials at this site. The fact that there are risks associated with hydrogen generally does not mean that the Project would cause significant impacts. Heliogen has already submitted a Hazardous Materials Business Plan in compliance with existing regulations for the calendar year for its existing operations and will update it accordingly to account for any increases in hazardous material volumes on site. Appellant provides no evidence to suggest the Project impacts would be significant here. Thus, Appellant failed to present a fair argument of substantial evidence to support an impact related to hazards. g. The IS/MND adequately addresses impacts to biological resources.

Appellant and its consultant Mr. Cashen argue that the IS/MND does not provide an accurate picture of the environmental setting for birds. They also argue that the reflective panels pose some risk of mortality for birds. However, they do not provide any evidence to support their conclusory statements that such impacts would occur. Thus, Appellant has failed to provide a fair argument that there would be potential impacts to nesting bird species.

As Appellant acknowledges, no trees would be removed as part of the Project. 43 Though
Appellant and Mr. Cashen have alleged there would be potential impacts at trees not affected by the Project, neither provides any evidence to support these assertions. Likewise, they provide no evidence to support the assertion that there would be potentially significant impacts due to the panels themselves.

During the Planning Commission meeting, Commissioners and staff discussed Appellant’s comments related to biological resource impacts and the IS/MND’s conclusion finding that there are no biological resources on the Project site. While there are perimeter trees and landscaping throughout the parking lot and surrounding the buildings, those would not be removed or disturbed. Further, all of the development’s ground is either paved or bare dirt and does not provide suitable habitat. The Project site is located within the urban core of the City and surrounded by existing development. While the Antelope Valley as a whole is part of avian

41 IS/MND, p. 31 [Hazard and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure 3].

42 Ibid.

43 See IS/MND, pp. 21-22.

June 9, 2023

migration routes, migratory species tend to rely on areas with water and readily available habitat, which is not present at the Project site. Appellant has presented to evidence to the contrary.

The proposed Project would install approximately 400 solar panels on a 0.55-acre portion of the site. Given the small scale of the solar installation and its urban context, Appellant has not demonstrated that the proposed Project is hazardous to birds as alleged. h. Noise impacts are accurately and adequately addressed.

Appellant and its consultant, Ms. Toncheva, raise several arguments related to the analysis of noise impacts in the IS/MND. None have merit.

1. The IS/MND accurately describes the existing setting for purposes of determining noise impacts.

Though Appellant argues that the Noise Report prepared for the IS/MND fails to identify the nearest sensitive receptors, the Noise Report states that the nearest residences would be the closest sensitive land uses (referred to as NSAs therein)44 and evaluates impacts at the adjacent apartment complex. There are no significant noise impacts identified at that closest sensitive land use, and therefore the IS/MND concludes there will also be no significant noise impacts to other uses further away, for example, across a busy commercial roadway.45 Appellant does not provide evidence to the contrary.

2. The analysis of construction noise is adequate.

Ms. Toncheva also argues that the construction noise analysis fails to include noise from pile driving, even though the analysis states that certain components would be “installed by driven pile….” Ms. Toncheva also allege s that the use of Lmax as measured from the center of a work site is inappropriate, and that if measured from the boundaries of the construction areas, as is alleged to be appropriate, there would be significant impacts. Next, Ms. Toncheva argues that the Noise Report did not conduct a Leq analysis, and that Ms. Toncheva was able to create such an analysis from data used in the model. She states that analysis indicates there would be ambient noise increases of 15 dB above existing levels. Ms. Toncheva also claims that the IS/MND has no threshold for this impact, but that 10 dB is “a reasonable threshold,” and therefore this impact is significant as well. Ms. Toncheva is mistaken.

Chapter 8.24 of the City of Lancaster Municipal Code discusses noise regulations and establishes a permissible schedule for construction activities.46 Heliogen will limit construction to the allowable hours and days found in Section 8.24.040 of the Code. Additionally, the City of

44 SWCA Environmental Consultants (Nov. 2022) Noise and Ground Vibration Technical Report, p. 1.

45 Id. at pp. 23-24; IS/MND, pp. 40-41.

46 City of Lancaster Municipal Code, § 8.24.040.

June 9, 2023

Lancaster’s Public Health and Safety element of the General Plan includes a noise section.47 The City of Lancaster General Plan Noise Compatible Land Use Objectives specify a maximum exterior noise level of 65 dBA for noise-sensitive residential land uses.48 Per General Plan Policy 4.3.2, construction noise must not exceed 15 dBA above the noise objectives outlined in the Public Health and Safety Plan.49
In order to assess potential impacts resulting from single-event noise levels, the Lmax descriptor is employed for construction noise levels, as it accounts for the maximum level measured over a given time interval. Consequently, an 80 dBA Lmax threshold for project-related construction noise was utilized in the Noise Report to evaluate construction noise levels at nearby sensitive residential land uses.

Construction noise levels were determined using the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). Noise estimates associated with the Project's construction are derived from a list detailing the maximum quantity of construction equipment utilized on a given day. The anticipated noise produced by the construction equipment at the Site was conservatively calculated, taking into account the projected construction equipment roster expected to be employed at the Site.50 Estimated noise levels from construction activities at the closest noise- sensitive receptor from the center of the construction site were 74.1 dBA Leq and 76.8 dBA Lmax. Therefore, without employing mitigation, noise impacts associated with the construction activities for the Project would be less than the 80 dBA Lmax threshold for project-related construction noise.

Pile driving activities, specifically driving poles to support solar panels, from the construction noise impact analysis at neighboring noise-sensitive receptors were excluded from the analysis.

This exclusion was made for multiple reasons, including: pile driving is a temporary and intermittent construction activity; pile driving will be conducted during daytime hours and in compliance with local noise ordinances; and using Lmax alone may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the overall noise impacts because each pile driving event will last just a few seconds. The analysis of construction noise impacts adequately addressed construction noise and the conclusions are supported by substantial evidence. Appellant has not raised substantial evidence of a fair argument to the contrary.

47 City of Lancaster General Plan 2030 (July 14, 2009) pp. 3-13 through 3-21.

48 Id. at p. 3-14 [Table 3-1: Noise Compatible Land Use Objectives].

49 Id. at p. 3-18 [Policy 4.3.2].

50 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 11, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Noise Discussion/ SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 4.

June 9, 2023

3. The Noise Study’s impact analysis considered noise impacts associated with proposed solar panels.

Ms. Toncheva also claims that the noise study has erroneously included a margin comment requesting an analysis of the impacts of “500 heliostats + 400 PV panels,” and that this requested analysis was not included. This is incorrect.51 The Noise Report lists all of the noise sources considered, which includes the heliostats and PV panels.52 Appellant also suggests that cleaning the solar panels will create a noise impact. However, it provides no evidence to support this assertion.

The results presented in the Noise Report accurately represent the 1-hour Leq noise level, assuming the continuous operation of all the listed sources, including the 500 heliostats and 400 PV panels. The analysis comprehensively takes into account the noise generated by these specific components, along with other sources, to provide a complete assessment. Nothing further is required.

4. Baseline noise levels are sufficiently and accurately addressed.

Ms. Toncheva also argues that there is not an adequate discussion of baseline noise levels, including claims that some measurements were taken from behind barriers, certain measurements were not disclosed, and that there is no explanation for different readings taken at nearby locations. Between September 8 and 15, 2022, six (6) short-term and one (1) long-term sound monitoring was conducted to document the acoustic environmental setting of the Site.53 The goal of conducting the baseline noise survey was not to establish a reference point for evaluating potential impacts of the Project, as the applicable local noise ordinances do not rely on increases from existing noise levels. Instead, the measured noise levels serve to verify whether the current noise levels in the Project area are in line with the surrounding land uses and the sound levels documented in relevant literature for these land uses.

The selection of monitoring locations aimed to represent the Site’s nearest noise-sensitive receptors. Noise-sensitive receptors are generally defined as places where people reside or where unwanted sound may negatively impact the existing land use, like residential neighborhoods, historical monuments, schools, hospitals, places of worship, and libraries. By focusing on these locations, the monitoring efforts aim to capture the Project's potential impacts on areas where noise levels are of utmost importance for the well-being and day-to-day activities of the people using these spaces. Monitoring locations and the duration of the surveys were

51 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 11, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Noise Discussion/ SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 5.

52 SWCA Environmental Consultants (Nov. 2022) Noise and Ground Vibration Technical Report, p. 24 [Table 15: Equipment Sound Power Levels].

53 Id. at pp. 8 [Table 5: Monitoring Locations], 10 [Table 9: Summary of Ambient Sound Measurements], 12 [Figure 3: Monitoring Sites], A-1 through A-7 [Appendix A: Monitoring Location Photographs].

June 9, 2023

selected based on the following factors: proximity to noise-sensitive receptors; coverage; security; access limitations; temporal variability; time efficiency and scheduling flexibility; and maintenance limitations.

Some of the barriers are not tall enough to block the line-of-sight between the sound monitor and the noise-sources, failing to shield effects on the recorded readings. Additionally, some measurements may have been taken in proximity to barriers to ensure the safety and security of monitoring equipment and to comply with property access limitations, which can influence the measured noise levels. However, existing noise sources close to those monitoring locations, like noise coming from the Sienna apartment complex, are on the other side of the barrier. Thus, if any influence of the results occurred, it would be a reduction of the measured baseline levels, leading the values used to represent these noise sensitive receptors to be lower and more conservative.

5. Noise impacts were not analyzed at nearby radio stations because they are not considered noise-sensitive receptors.

Appellant also alleges that noise impacts at certain nearby land uses were not analyzed (i.e., KTPI, Fox Sports 610 AM, and Clear Channel radio, as well as Antelope Valley Springs of Life Ministries and iLEAD Lancaster Charter School). However, operational impacts were analyzed at the Antelope Valley Springs of Life Ministries and iLEAD Lancaster Charter School receptors.54 In fact, estimated noise impacts at these receptors from the operation of the Project were determined to be less than the existing baseline levels. Noise levels were not estimated at the KTPI, Fox News 610 AM, and Clear Channel radio receptors as radio stations are not considered noise-sensitive receptors.
55 i. The findings necessary to approve the Conditional Use Permit are supported.

Appellant argues that the City cannot make the findings required to approve a Conditional Use Permit. In doing so, it relies on health risk impacts from construction and operational air emissions and potential risk of upset arguments, which are addressed in the construction health risk impacts and hazardous materials mitigation sections in its letter. As made clear in the parts of this letter addressing those topics the Project will not “adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area.” Thus, the Planning Commission properly made the findings required to grant a Conditional Use Permit. Appellant provides no further argument to the contrary.

54 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 11, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Noise Discussion/ SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 3, citing SWCA Environmental Consultants (Nov. 2022) Noise and Ground Vibration Technical Report, p. B-3 [Figure B-3:

Project operation noise isopleth – Single Point Map].

55 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 11, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Noise Discussion/ SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 3.

June 9, 2023

j. The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s General and Specific Plans.

Appellant has also argued that the Project is inconsistent with General Plan policies to minimize and mitigate air quality impacts, as well as Section 14 of the Specific Plan.

As discussed elsewhere herein, all potentially significant air quality impacts are mitigated. Thus, the Project is consistent with the General Plan’s policies to minimize and mitigate air impacts.56 k. Cumulative impacts are adequately analyzed.

Appellant argues that the IS/MND fails to adequately address cumulative biological and air quality impacts. To the extent that these arguments rely on the above arguments, nothing additional is required.

Dr. Fox has also alleged that the IS/MND fails to identify the other projects to be used for the cumulative analysis. This is incorrect – the IS/MND contains such a list, to which Dr. Fox cites.57 The IS/MND defines the geographic scope for this table as foreseeable projects occurring within one (1) mile of the Site.58 This table is not intended to be exhaustive, including all projects in the area. Rather, it represents the projects in the Site’s vicinity that may have some related environmental impact to the Project. The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts for any of the environmental issues analyzed in the IS/MND, and would therefore not contribute to cumulative impacts viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects.

As discussed in SWCA’s letter, the Project’s construction and operation emissions would not exceed any AVAQMD regional or localized significance thresholds, and any nearby projects would also have to comply with any AVAQMD significance thresholds and guidance. Thus, Project emissions would not be cumulatively considerable.

II. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed herein, we respectfully request that the City Council deny the Appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s approval of the Project.

56 SWCA Environmental Consultants (May 5, 2023) Letter Re: Lancaster Solar RD Supplemental Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Discussion/SWCA Project No. 71201, p. 5.

57 IS/MND, p. 52 [Table 8]; see Fox, Phyllis (March 8, 2023) Comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Heliogen, Inc. Research & Development Facility p. 34, fn. 120 [citing IS, p. 52].

58 IS/MND, p. 51.

June 9, 2023

Sincerely,

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

Amy R. Higuera

ARH:BC

1867183v2

STAFF REPORT
City of Lancaster
California Choice Energy Authority
Date: June 13, 2023
To: Mayor Parris and City Council Members
From: Jason Caudle, City Manager
George Harris, Director of Finance
Subject:Review the Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budgets and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
City Council and City Council acting as Lancaster Housing Authority, Lancaster Choice Energy, and Lancaster Power Authority Recommendation:

Discuss and direct staff to schedule the Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) adoption for June 27, 2023.

California Choice Energy Authority (CCEA) Board Recommendation:

Discuss the budget and direct City of Lancaster staff to schedule the CCEA Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget adoption for June 27, 2023.

Fiscal Impact:

The City of Lancaster Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget totals $254 million, including $30.2 million for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Background:

City of Lancaster Budget
By July 1 of each year, the City is required to adopt a budget, which establishes appropriations and estimates revenue for the coming fiscal year. The proposed budget is a culmination of many months of work by the City Council and staff in reviewing priorities and evaluating programs, with a focus on maintaining responsive and relevant services for residents.

City Council’s priorities address:
•Public safety;
•Sound fiscal foundation and resilience;
•Protect city infrastructure;
•Measure LC appropriations; and
•Continued development of new facilities, programs, and services have been incorporated into the City’s Proposed FY 2023-2024 Budget.

JNB 1
06/13/23
JC
The following table summarizes the proposed citywide budget:

Expenditures by Category
FY 23 Proposed
Budget
Personnel $50.8 M
Operations, Capital Outlay, & Maintenance 173.0 Capital Projects 30.2
TOTAL $254.0 M
Estimating revenues for the upcoming fiscal year and forecasting out-years is essential. By reviewing past years’ actual revenue receipts, new revenue sources, fee-based program and service projections, grant opportunities, and the State’s economic outlook, the City can best determine the revenues available for spending allocations. The City estimated FY 2023-2024 revenues of $317.6 million.

The City’s largest unrestricted funding source is the General Fund, totals $109.7 million in resources. General Fund resources include property tax, sales tax, fees, grants, and others. Sales and Use tax and Measure LC District Sales Tax combine to be the top General Fund resources, which is projected at $47.7 million, per HDL, the city’s sales tax consultant. The proposed General Fund appropriations total $117.4 million, including $8.7 million for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and $634.4 thousand in net transfers out to support the Landscaping Maintenance District and others.

The City of Lancaster desires to maintain a prudent level of financial resources to guard its residents against service disruption in the event of unexpected, temporary revenue shortfalls or unanticipated expenditures. Reserves accumulated during years when revenues exceeded expenditures cushion the City’s transition to a lower revenue base and allow the City to adjust spending in response to economic downturns, emergencies, State revenue takeaways, and/or investment opportunities. The Proposed FY 2023-2024 Budget significantly recognizes and strengthens the City Council’s fiscal prudence and discipline priority by maintaining reserves calculated at approximately 40% of general fund revenues or $43.7M.

To continue transforming the City, we must continue focusing on the infrastructure in the City; we accomplish this through our Capital Improvement Program (CIP). We are persistent in our aggressive, proactive approach to allocating more capital improvement funding. The CIP for the Proposed FY 2023-2024 Budget totals $30.4 million. Additional CIP projects will be presented after a comprehensive fiscal year-end review in October of this year.

The Proposed FY 2023-2024 Budget addresses community needs while maintaining healthy Reserves that will enable the City to continue providing the community with a full scope of high- quality municipal services, programs, and special events that enhance the quality of life of all Lancaster residents. It will also provide the required resources to construct significant capital improvement projects that will improve infrastructure and facilities and beautify the community.

California Choice Energy Authority Budget
The California Choice Energy Authority is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) comprised of member municipalities. Formed in 2012, the CCEA provides its member’s economies of scale to support the activities of each Community Choice Aggregate. CCEA initiatives remain in providing long- term sustainable energy and cost containment for member Community Choice Aggregates.

The CCEA Proposed FY 2023-2024 Budget totals $10.1 million. The CCEA Proposed Budget projects an ending reserve totaling $1.3 million by the end of FY 2023-2024.

The City’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and CCEA’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget will be presented to the City Council Board for final adoption on June 27, 2023.

JC: GH
Attachments:

City of Lancaster Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget CCEA Proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024

Fund Balance Proposed FY24
Estimated Beginning
Fund Balance FY24
40,732,907
Proposed Operating Proposed Operating
Expenditure FY24
Proposed
Capital FY24
8,659,513
0 Proposed Transfers Proposed
Transfers In FY24
993,851
FY 24 Proposed Ending
Fund Balance
32,890,261
FUND_GROUP
General Funds - Spendable
New Tyler Fund New Tyler Description

GENERAL FUND

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
Revenue FY24 Out FY24
101
120
141
109,651,484 108,109,782
1,230,580
0 1,718,686
12,711,535
(105,578)
0 0
0 0
90,473 11,571,428
(105,578)0 0
General Funds - Spendable Total
General Funds - Nonspendable
General Funds - Nonspendable Total
Internal Service Funds
53,338,864
26,305,750
109,651,484 109,340,362 8,659,513 1,718,686 1,084,324 44,356,111 26,305,750NON General Funds - Nonspendable
26,305,750
645,586
(0)
26,305,750
347,092
(2)
1,901,706
2,248,796
47,031
(2,561,424)
766,062
(2,215,384)
(1,646,416)
(254)
111
112
113
FLEET 1,616,490
4,007,252
4,837,194
10,460,936
99,810
3,114,682
1,303,725
4,323,570
29,883,861
1,460,390
4,709,966
4,276,849
204,932
1,914,984
5,182,105
5,416,598
12,513,687
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF

GENERAL LIABILITY ISF
1,174,851
579,402
1,754,253
1,901,708
2,547,293
(47,500)
(2,204,659)
(416,626)
2,695,206
(30,448,857)
(1,460,644)
(196,990)
0 (203,193)
(5,605,569)
4,924,350
5,753
14,776,055
46,543
Internal Service Funds Total
Special Revenue Funds
0 5,279
0 201
202
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
230
300
301
310
312
313
424
456
850
AQMD 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 LA COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT

MEASURE A

MEASURE M

MEASURE R

METRO- LOCAL

GAS TAX
GAS TAX- SB 1
TDA 3
TDA 8
3,471,446
0 121,037
6,363,906
1,081,420
0 737,133
0 343,048 2,527,206
0 0
0 0
0 13,792,545
0 10,018,879 2,177
4,276,849 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1,739
12,071,326
5,076,468
15,000
2,129,006
5,869,807
20,110
580,951
7,851,702
5,753
18,993,206
28,760

PROPOSITION A

PROPOSITION B
PROPOSITION C 4,217,151
0 682,900
0 17,783
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
PROP 42- CONGESTION MGT

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRA

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFTEY

RECYCLING

STATE GRANTS- OTHER

FEDERAL GRANTS- OTHER

HOMELAND SECURITY
CDBG

NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION

HOME GRANT

RECYCLED WATER FUND

STILL MEADOW
(249,017)
(0)
433,883
(0)
(198,865)
(19,723,552)
1,543,659
333,815
(388,588)
2,860,749
1,424,947
1,599
201,979
20,347,663
6,856,288
260,000
384,838
2,118,529
2,450,524
0 0
12,144,240
202,950
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
(381,724)
(13,638,658)
5,746,474
333,815
348,124
2,860,749
620,182
(69)
0 260,000
02,400,000 205,845 1,457,443
2,000,000
125,000
2,804,046
304,888
0 0
719
16,266
0 194,486
(0) (0)
0CFD 21-1 PUBLIC SERVICES 5,000
103,621,560
4,673,400
1,950,000
5,828,000
2,133,000
14,584,400
40,000
5,000
28,042,499
4,646,787
3,253,547
4,671,941
2,359,970
14,932,245
0 0 0
Special Revenue Funds Total
Maintenance District Funds
(32,531,383)
468,629
20,608,688 14,475,677 10,213,365 18,176,678
138,212
0 6,643,823
970,578
7,752,613
40,000
441,498
7,770,367
1,384,424
(1)
200,000
106,700
62,733
420
421
422
423

SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

DRAINAGE MAINT DISTRICT
0 0
0 0
357,030
251,299
127,854
174,708
0 625,738 929,108
5,615,618
1,372,256
8,082,242
134,750
0 0
Maintenance District Funds Total
Developer Fee Funds
0 910,891 929,108
203
410
411
412
413
414
416
457
PARK BOND 0
0 0
0 0
0 134,750 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

SIGNAL DEVELOPER FEES

DRAINAGE DEVELOPER FEES

BIOLOGIAL IMPACT FEES

URBAN STRUCTURES IMPACT FEE

TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
ZERO NET ENERGY (Solar)

MARIPOSA LILY
357,498 84,000 0
0 0
7,320,367
1,084,424
458,161
425,310
106,700
450,000
300,000
0 0
42,507
0 415,655
425,310200,000
62,733
Developer Fee Funds Total
Lancaster Housing Authority Funds
9,949,942
74,736,598
2,112,660
76,849,258
226,861
17,032,748
17,259,609
674,945
1,074,000
1,085,628
0 975,715 42,507
114,829
0 0
10,005,720
73,804,266
2,112,660
75,916,925
980,687
39,288,756
40,269,443
1,075,105
1,075,105
226,107,141
314
520

LOW-MODERATE INCOME HOUSING

LANCASTER HOUSING AUTHORITY
1,903,132 0
Lancaster Housing Authority Funds Total
Enterprise Funds
1,085,628
1,911,335
74,813,205
76,724,540
400,160
1,903,132
1,156,625
52,285,939
53,442,564
3,553,681
0 0
0 0
0 0
114,829
884
271,258
272,142
0 0
0 0
500
501

LANCASTER POWER AUTHORITY

LANCASTER COICE ENERGY
Enterprise Funds Total
Finance Authority
Finance Authority Total
Grand Total
0 530 LANCASTER FINANCING AUTHORITY 3,553,681
3,553,681
17,534,731
674,945
162,476,520
400,160
317,602,708
3,553,681
223,728,171
0 30,243,916 17,534,731
1 Citywide Expenditures - All Funds

FUND NUMBER/NAME
101 - GENERAL FUND

DIVISION
1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION

CATEGORY

PERSONNEL COSTS
Full Account Name FY22 ACTUALS FY23 BUDGET FY24 PROPOSED 191ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
252,873
50,255
12,765
15,000
731,258
-
280,893
67,357
222,883
58,000
FRINGE BENEFITS 23,005
861,236
18,595
759,224FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
82,130
1,066
4,493
-
117,000 112,500

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
3,368
25,070
89,514
2,384
23,094
333
2,000 2,000
170,500 140,000
37,722
13,500
33,254
13,500OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CASH VARIANCE -

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
141,906
136,549
113,600
111,105
66,729
262,409
83,565
-

EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
FUEL
GAS

GENERAL LIABILITY

LEGAL SERVICES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
2,538
124,316
2,500
84 112,653
2,500
65,718
-
860
-
2,875
-
3,500
250
3,500
350

PRINTING/BINDING -
410,362
-
35,282
4,190
15,067
8,911
-
215
852,866
215

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
712,866
8,180
50,000
6,000
114,200
226
126,134
6,000
114,200
8,180

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
1100 - CITY COUNCIL PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
92 13,597
-
1,243
-
14,258 14,258
FRINGE BENEFITS 2,352 2,352

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
224,546
517
234,131 234,131

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

SALARIES- OTHER

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
42,825
237
42,300 42,300

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

CASH VARIANCE
2,317
19,927
-
3,692
72,000
3,692
72,000OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
FUEL
52,451
8,920
-
13,000 13,000
979 2,538
900,000
3,000
335
900,000
3,000
LEGAL SERVICES 1,033,611
1,300
-
2,973
154

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
2,750
550
3,000
550
PRINTING/BINDING 49 362 500

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
258,730 315,910 335,910
8,978
95,00070,799
6,000
95,000

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
39,396
10,486
4,466
2,505
29,170
8,978
2,505
29,170
1,002

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 1200 - CITY CLERK PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
81 98,412
11,776
4,494
129,708
30,098
164,210
42,210
FRINGE BENEFITS 7,500 10,359 13,834

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
296,099 397,692 559,362
-
55,904
452
1,299
-
72,000
750
90,000
750OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
9,250
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
6,117
864
8,040 8,040

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
8,526
19,486
17,419
12,000
24,500
15,000OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CASH VARIANCE -

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTIONS EXPENSE
FUEL
26,206
615
365,885
103,469
859
140,573
69,563
859
140,573
-
GENERAL LIABILITY 30,353 57,387 77,709

GRANT EXPENSE -

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
- 50
11,953
300
11,9531,170

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
1,679
8 2,850
26 3,975
150
PRINTING/BINDING 655 353 353

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

TRAINING
7,052
-
757
-
341,961 200,000
362
270
500
270TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER
-
-
411300 - LEGAL SERVICES

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
49,226
7,420
2,194
5,000
148,290
-
14,579
230
728
-
62,492
15,512
57,665
15,850
FRINGE BENEFITS 4,615
191,606
4,730
196,429FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
18,000 18,000

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
5,981
-
428
2 101 - GENERAL FUND 1300 - LEGAL SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CASH VARIANCE
4,231
-
8,392 8,604

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

GENERAL LIABILITY
- 11,109
2,500
19,126
19,423
2,500
16,927
1,959
-

GRANT EXPENSE -
LEGAL SERVICES 710
-
169
-
45,000
1,000
45,000
1,000

LIABILITIES INSURANCE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
- 750
500
750
500316

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
190,355 220,000
1,000
106,000
1,000
-
-
TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 165

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 1400 - HUMAN RESOURCES PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
211
296,535
34,421
21,801
17,500
811,267
-
152,331
1,181
4,371
-
277,638
63,853
298,145
74,658
FRINGE BENEFITS 22,779 26,533

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
851,256 1,015,597
144,000 171,000

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
111
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
22,349
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
643,711
4,200
41,374
-
149,500
37,285
120,000
44,483

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

AUDIO VISUALS -

CASH VARIANCE -

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT CHARGES

GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

LEGAL SERVICES
58,737
1,583
367,564
5,000
115,854
11,000
-
125,647
4,890
174,129
6,000
170,336
-

LIABILITIES INSURANCE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
-
43 -
2,500
6,000

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
13,517
8,089
410
5,000 5,000
250
PRINTING/BINDING - 400 400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

RECRUITMENT EXPENSE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
508,725 605,000 500,000
5,000
45,00033,505 30,000
-
-

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
3,240
188,031
125,000
277,500
50,000
50,000

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

TUITION REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
34,322
20,006
6,287
30,000
8,156
30,000

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER
-
-
1500 - COMMUNICATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 113

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
143,884
16,029
6,577
192,081
45,160
166,077
41,978
FRINGE BENEFITS 10,000 14,634 14,017

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
432,152 588,934 565,723
-
71,055
634
108,000 90,000
LT/ST DISABILITY 1,890

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
-
14,769
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
13,485
1,272
75,734 50,734

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
12,576
53,799
61,108
5,372
25,795
126,990
118,959
5,320
24,779
126,990
79,110
5,320

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
-
GENERAL LIABILITY 40,442 95,628 77,692

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
- -
3,000
85,000
381,737
393,404
1,652
60,087
229,796
187,697
3,000
85,000
381,737
393,404

PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
-
17,938 49,693 49,693
-

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
2,028
-
-
15,000
20,500
15,000
20,500

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 1510 - LANCASTER TV PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
10,045
-
500

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
-
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
34,471
96 88,200 58,200

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
951
2,264
6,169
-
-
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 65,000
500
65,000
26,507
500

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
-
-

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
14 -
-
3 101 - GENERAL FUND 1510 - LANCASTER TV OPERATING EXPENDITURES PRINTING/BINDING - 4,000 8,000

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
-
-
753,000 753,000
52,162 288,079 200,000
-

TRAINING -

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE 1,737 174,574 174,574 1700 - FINANCE AND IT PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
87 154,673
25,555
7,072
125,254
29,531
115,100
30,814
FRINGE BENEFITS 7,416 10,448 10,101

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
416,926 384,037 392,074
-
37,296
489
2,238
-
332
-
43,200
5,000
54,000
5,000OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
13,915
1,086

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
55,855
1,354
13,331
62,000
16,821
60,000
17,173

OPERATING EXPENDITURES -

AUDIO VISUALS -
CASH VARIANCE (72)

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
62,460
1,495
111,931
1,190
98,736
1,190
-

GENERAL LIABILITY

GRANT EXPENSE
60,675 57,385 54,613
-

LEGAL SERVICES -

LIABILITIES INSURANCE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
-
-
-

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
6,238
47 3,000
400
3,000
400
PRINTING/BINDING 109,054
244,417
185,132
238,000
185,132
245,000PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
-
50,283 24,000 24,000

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
839
-

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
1,343
1,269
-
1,200
5,000
1,200
5,000

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER
-
-
1710 - ACCOUNTING PERSONNEL COSTS 271

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
349,936
35,074
15,907
393,515
87,632
254,353
63,914
FRINGE BENEFITS 25,000 29,660 21,453

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
1,013,224 1,206,540 866,425
-
175,170
1,520
4,480
7,466
200,700
100,000
126,000
10,000
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
27,514
43,361
3,090
918 -

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
30,098 52,846 37,949

OPERATING EXPENDITURES -

CASH VARIANCE -

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

GENERAL LIABILITY
128,315 113,391
2,500
211,337
1,500
86,454
2,500
108,768
1,500
-
98,577

LEGAL SERVICES -

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
10,000 10,000
474
-
-
3,500
274,468
7,000
3,500
294,468
7,000

PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
160,747
-
-
-TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 1720 - BUDGET PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
26 32,943
3,603
1,488
46,682
9,929
126,254
31,731
FRINGE BENEFITS 2,500 3,776 10,703

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
99,183 143,130 430,068
-
21,251
145
439
827
23,400
750
72,000
750
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
1,993
-
286

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
2,807
-
11,608
6,269 18,837
29,528

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
45,706
-
-
GENERAL LIABILITY 10,111 19,126 62,153

LEGAL SERVICES -

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
-

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
-
-
-
36,000
500
36,000
500TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT -

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 1730 - PROCUREMENT PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
36 38,710
4,177
1,734
2,500
116,767
-
55,489
12,497
88,744
21,415
FRINGE BENEFITS 4,241 7,498

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
170,133 302,295
26,451
202
34,200 54,000
4 101 - GENERAL FUND 1730 - PROCUREMENT PERSONNEL COSTS LT/ST DISABILITY 606

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
1 -
10,000
7,452
10,000
13,241
4,613
-
-
333
3,292
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

GENERAL LIABILITY
24,553
335
25,276
81,830
500
40,164
28,346
500
46,615

LEGAL SERVICES -

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
-
2,000 2,000

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
-
-
-
TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - 2,000 2,000

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 1800 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
4 4,163
375
181

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
12,488
-
2,915
22 LT/ST DISABILITY 69

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
265
-
44 WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
431
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
(2,637)
-
103

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
1,151
-
-

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
6,660
-
-
-

TRAINING -

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT -

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

BAD DEBT EXPENSE
-
-
-1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES

DEBT SERVICES

FULL-TIME SALARIES

GENERAL LIAB ISF
-
-
1,500,000
1,109,000
98 1,432,247
593,860

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SALARIES (OFFSET)
250
1,718,686
375,000
481,738
4,250
722,881
-
1,107,247
(1,641,500)
2000 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
121,678
31,266
FRINGE BENEFITS 11,155
414,483FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CASH VARIANCE

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
54,000
200,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,154
53,679

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
GENERAL LIABILITY 46,615

GRANT EXPENSE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
-
- 80,447
600,000

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE

PRINTING/BINDING
-
-
-

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

STREET LIGHT SERVICES

TRAINING
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,000

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
2100 - PLANNING PERSONNEL COSTS 196
228,378
37,303
10,735
15,000
686,867
-
130,111
1,100
3,288
-
307,072
75,039
328,158
89,345
FRINGE BENEFITS 23,157
941,503
28,669
1,117,834FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
144,000 162,000

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
818
29,016
4,500
36,121
2,084
20,387
20,961
61,448
3,066
82 5,400
39,096
-
41,238
35,000
189,032
1,620
48,961
30,000
106,314

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
1,269 168

GENERAL LIABILITY

GRANT EXPENSE
70,812
-
153,004
4,000
139,845
MEETINGS & CONFERENCES 1,620 6,995
5 101 - GENERAL FUND 2100 - PLANNING OPERATING EXPENDITURES MISC. EXPENSES - 9,000

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
3,047
443
-
4,150
700
710
4,150
700
710PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
18,865
-
337,600
220
311,250
220
4,090
-
355,711
2,624
5,000
657,670
775

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
1,370 6,100
500
501VEHICLE OPERATIONS

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
4,459
14 4,090
2200 - HOUSING PERSONNEL COSTS
20,332
6,146
1,051
7,500
61,455
-
85,426
15,988
61,858
12,006
FRINGE BENEFITS 6,999
261,923
5,211
210,711FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
4,481
80 45,000 36,000

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
730
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
1,945
-
196
1,903
-
11,472 9,229

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
8,133
-
1,550
500
71,955
168

GENERAL LIABILITY

LEGAL SERVICES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
40,442 76,502
3,000
77,692
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
200
750
200
750

PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
200,000
1,000
2,400
200 200
551VEHICLE OPERATIONS

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
PROPERTY ACQUISITION 346,330
2300 - BUILDING AND SAFTEY PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
231
361,531
41,470
16,649
25,000
1,075,614
-
165,540
1,296
7,259
938
350,675
72,816
321,859
75,739
FRINGE BENEFITS 29,373 29,086

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
1,075,194 1,096,377
180,000
4,288
180,000
4,288
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
18,519
-
3,199
31,377
9,940
3,016
11,803
125,288
-
47,093
122,093
5,900
48,021
141,418OPERATING EXPENDITURES
8,885 503

GENERAL LIABILITY

LEGAL SERVICES
210,381 155,383

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
2,994
-
4,662
-
5,600
500
5,000
300
500
5,000
300
PRINTING/BINDING - 250 250

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
216,344 496,181 400,000
34,213
-
-
-
40,000
100
200
100

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
- 4,000
2,100
34,213
1,424
35,728
2,100
1,877

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 2400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
99 120,635
21,015
5,707
138,278
33,092
169,232
43,065
FRINGE BENEFITS 7,500 11,521 15,223

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
350,896 423,970 576,471
-
70,422
556
2,668
-
140
-
72,000
1,072
90,000

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
11,768
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
34,995
1,098
10,813
215
22,638
18,570 25,249

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

ASSESSMENTS -

CASH VARIANCE -

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
170,789
49,997
293,851
262,760
75,978
209,844
-

GENERAL LIABILITY

GRANT EXPENSE
74,278 111,569
160
104,208
-

LEGAL SERVICES -

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
860
-
8,100

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
881
-
600
150
1,000
150
PRINTING/BINDING 124 250 410

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SHERIFFS CONTRACT

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
3,475,225 179,477 178,010
-
265,855
490
1,053,500
1,500
272,960

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

PROPERTY ACQUISITION
15 -
-
6,100
346,330
2600 - BEAUTIFICATION OPERATING EXPENDITURES COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS
42,687
200,000
6 101 - GENERAL FUND 2600 - BEAUTIFICATION
2700 - ENVIRONMENTAL

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
FUEL

GENERAL LIABILITY
255
85,156
216,000
2,112
100,914
22,123
10,440
343,752
54,000
80,000
15,056
16,008
84 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

VEHICLE OPERATIONS

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

TEMPORARY SALARIES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE
FUEL

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

GENERAL LIABILITY
MISC. EXPENSES
46,880
2,000

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

UNIFORMS
1,500
250
174,628
23,400
59,965
6,350
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 275
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS VEHICLES 75,042
32,690
7,668
2800 - FILM PERSONNEL COSTS CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION
FRINGE BENEFITS 4,699

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

PART-TIME SALARIES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

GENERAL LIABILITY
111,355
18,000
-
4,877
5,336
1,950
15,538
500

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

POSTAGE

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

UNIFORMS
12,000
23,500
5,450
3000 - PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
273
312,066
43,163
20,312
589,949
130,516
1,195,619
307,282
FRINGE BENEFITS 25,000 47,823 102,857

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
897,148
1,069
147,664
1,528
4,998
-
16,076
1,808,776 4,072,739
303,075
32,160
792,000
32,160OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT -

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
33,243
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
357,717
3,694
761,116 600,000

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
35,391
3,510
79,224
15,000
178,386
15,000OPERATING EXPENDITURES

ANIMAL CONTROL -

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
FUEL
60,530
35 105,151 566,227
-
24,696 18,838 1,681
GENERAL LIABILITY 127,111 313,497 701,422

GRANT EXPENSE -

LEGAL SERVICES -

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
-
-
19,000
1,455,636
19,000

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
721
27 1,800
200
2,600
200
PRINTING/BINDING 1,733
848,037
9,279
-
11,100
2,253,000
20,000
11,100
2,253,000
20,000

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

SHERIFFS CONTRACT

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
-
1,251
-
17,000 17,000
TRAINING 185

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
552
14,051
119,864
54,000
32,000
111,286
54,000
32,000
6,962

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
-
-

VEHICLES -
953100 - COMMUNITY SAFTEY PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
124,176
11,502
5,700
10,000
373,845
1,084
79,008
532
95,962
18,176
58,926
12,766
FRINGE BENEFITS 9,881 7,619

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
294,226 200,723
54,000
-
36,000

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
3,012
-
-
5,487
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ANIMAL CONTROL

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
FUEL
-
1,071
10,594
1,145,461
47,738
-
12,679
60,663
-
12,887
1,690,000
-
8,792
1,690,000
747,120

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
8,885 923

GENERAL LIABILITY

LEGAL SERVICES
57,797 31,317

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
2,615,983
-
3,278,741
500
3,368,068
500106
-

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SHERIFFS CONTRACT

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
641,588 634,328 134,328
40,633
28,832,428
5,000
24,334,375 26,913,125
2,500
28,000
4,251
1,815
-TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-

VEHICLE OPERATIONS

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
22,301
-
40,633 3,377
3200 - CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
204
268,599
29,237
12,792
20,000
176,101
32,037
129,747
26,403
FRINGE BENEFITS 15,468 12,010
7 101 - GENERAL FUND 3200 - CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL COSTS FULL-TIME SALARIES H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
805,836
2,146
134,104
1,145
4,784
-
539,936
90,000
441,967
72,000

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
45,490
-
15,705
-
15,080
2,475
23,276
-
50,000
14,000
50,000
-
23,649
500
19,358
500OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
FUEL

GENERAL LIABILITY

LEGAL SERVICES
435,222
1,210
254,209
16,423
86,549
-
256,760
1,985
327,175
10,154
98,296
2,000
77,376
1,985
327,175
419
66,735
2,000
6,050MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
8,775
-
6,050

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
26,554
1,364
-
197,929
2,935
125
197,929
2,935
125

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
57,267 158,447 140,000
42,310
20,000
500
112,160
(3,072)
92,600
500

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
1,037
-
4,750 4,750
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 40,115 42,310 1,551

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER
-
-
-3300 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
-
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

EMERGENCY SUPPLIES

LEGAL SERVICES
88 -
-
-
- 2,388
86,455 86,455

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
-
27,000 27,000

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
-
-
-
-TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 3400 - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PERSONNEL COSTS SALARIES- OTHER

UNEMPLOYMENT
250,000
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES EMERGENCY SUPPLIES

GRANT EXPENSE
30,704
-
MISC. EXPENSES -

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
719,698
29,789
746,521
1,925,737
-
56,237 56,237
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE 1,424 105
163,659
34,613
9,617
10,000
4000 - PUBLIC WORKS PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
155,992
36,289
126,142
32,839
FRINGE BENEFITS 12,401
478,281
54,000
11,551
(52,424)
429,688

FRINGE BENEFITS (OFFSET)

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
455,786
-
60,200
590
54,000

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
2,042
-

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES (OFFSET)

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
12,112
(98,214)
66,950127,116
1,834
17,762
(1)
196,400
20,949WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CASH VARIANCE
18,820

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
63,255
690
-
256,508
1,685
34,741
1,685

GENERAL LIABILITY

GRANT EXPENSE
30,332
-
76,502 184,661

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
1,526
20,768
-
161
-
141
-
-
2,250
30,000
2,250
30,000
850
390
850
390PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
600
600
1,900
600
27,832
1,900
-
-
204100 - MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL COSTS
21,621
1,293
2,755
112,500
62,467
-
18,353
111
237
-

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
3,445
1,535
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
11,818
525
8 101 - GENERAL FUND 4100 - MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL COSTS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS
5,160
119,281 101,107
200,000
108,495

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL

GENERAL LIABILITY
-
2,135
491,484
9,903
-
1,269
647,281
84 358,936

GRANT EXPENSE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
-
3,998
-
-
-
-
25,254
11,307
25,254
275
-
4,452
-CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
4200 - TRANSPORTATION PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
78 109,268
10,122
5,564
45,000
325,483
102
93,764
20,184
-
-
8,305
287,487
-
-
68,438
437
45,180 -
LT/ST DISABILITY 2,216
225OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS
FUEL
6,912
12,363
1,068
10,544
19,386
85,846
1,950
6,436
140,780
-
38,636
12,592 -

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
199,964 62,251
4,677
219,395
2,000

GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

GRANT EXPENSE
153,890
950

MARKING AND STRIPING

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
10,189
8,500
1,000
2,686
-

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
1,580
1,455
16,430
46,927
-
1,500
1,250
214,102
65,337
4,500

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
15,313 469,398
175,000
2,870
7,197 6,350
4300 - UTILITY SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
33 33,054
2,009
2,694
FRINGE BENEFITS 85,000
FULL-TIME SALARIES 100,173
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
29,129
183
LT/ST DISABILITY 437

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
1,048
2,430
-
516

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS
5,048
106,630OPERATING EXPENDITURES 211,508 87,152
-

FUEL - -
GENERAL LIABILITY 239,763 436,707 333,714

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SHERIFFS CONTRACT

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
-
-
-
298
-
-
-
-

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 4400 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
4 3,930
235
172

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
11,689
2,202
24 LT/ST DISABILITY 53

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
167
512
-
33 WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS
321
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
FUEL 167 -

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
-
-

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

TRAFFIC SIGNAGE
16,235
-
-
-TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
338

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
-
38,801
-
38,772

VEHICLES
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
117
164,354
24,877
7,358
10,000
494,030
-
178,433
39,952
77,498
19,613
FRINGE BENEFITS 16,333 7,856

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
547,088 263,988
52,977
653
72,000 36,000
LT/ST DISABILITY 4,799
9 101 - GENERAL FUND 4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERSONNEL COSTS OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
903
-
5,253 5,253

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
14,638
2,134
1,425
13,991
-
44,500
23,962 11,563

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL

GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

LEGAL SERVICES
49,701
30,987
1,104
40,442
-
29,025
35,930
2,538
46,266
37,930
84 76,502 62,200
-

MARKING AND STRIPING

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
- -
4,000
2,120
625
3,895
743
504
4,000
2,120
625
-
PRINTING/BINDING 369
186,829
-
7,078
-
120
1,000
285,794
1,500
10,000
35,000
780
500
100,000
1,500
500
17,500
6,100

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
2,357
-
6,000

VEHICLE OPERATIONS

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
(57)
-
8,978 226
4700 - CAPITAL ENGINEERING PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
438
605,430
80,606
28,975
62,898
1,181,251
249,446
1,037,716
241,411
FRINGE BENEFITS 97,635
3,621,793
540,000
94,632
(683,895)
3,534,863

FRINGE BENEFITS (OFFSET)

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
1,815,727
2,168
230,311
2,451
12,102
-
512,100

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES (OFFSET)

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
56 39,701
6,539
567,204
158,635
6,539
(1,201,602)
156,595
17 5,452
53,785
-
206,935
5,981
22,651
390,677
-
154,827

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
370,574
3,610
15,231
567,074
600
345
4,700
200
331,207
1,757
671
481,559
479
645
4,700
200

GENERAL LIABILITY

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
1,562
90 PRINTING/BINDING 220
496,338
1,550
577,902
1,550
305,350
2,453
73,651

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
-
116,683
-
15,000
1,580
650
280
150-

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
1,700
125
58,651
995
1,125
2,202VEHICLE OPERATIONS

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
57,943
1826000 - PARCS PERSONNEL COSTS
206,833
28,860
16,100
13,203
596,278
1,147
111,737
1,018
3,627
-
231,399
50,239
197,354
47,659
FRINGE BENEFITS 19,088
709,485
17,406
672,265FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
111,600
1,000
90,000

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
367
-

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
99,960
17,713
33,099
501,200
3,099
126,509
811,154

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
29,963 31,075 29,445
2,000OPERATING EXPENDITURES

AUDIO VISUALS -
CASH VARIANCE - 100
86,610
6,975

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
95,584
1,848
2,808
210,508
6,647
6,346 4,470
GENERAL LIABILITY 101,105 137,704 85,098

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
-
- 8,200
83,30033,246 206,262

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
18,475
26,060
18,425
49,081
500
10,000
40,000
1,000PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

RECRUITMENT EXPENSE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
553,431 491,139 40,000
-
-
- 250,000
15,000132,873 55,600
-

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
-
10,300
500
9,700
20,368
92,000
500
3,300
18,756VEHICLE OPERATIONS 13,369

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
-
-
-VEHICLES
6010 - PASSPORTS PERSONNEL COSTS CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

GENERAL LIABILITY

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE

TRAINING

UNIFORMS

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER
16,943
4,986
1,498
57,714
18,000
2,528
10,672
15,538
3,350
750

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
250
300
6200 - COMMUNITY SERVICES 70
10 101 - GENERAL FUND 6200 - COMMUNITY SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
86,796
10,214
4,396
5,000
260,919
-
58,517
13,171
38,936
9,782
FRINGE BENEFITS 4,461
179,417
3,192
132,631FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
43,755
390
36,000 27,000

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
2,006
-

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
-
-
134,386
-
9,040
-
32,906
847
8,374
200
-
125,000
175,115
7,858
8,700
5,809
8,700OPERATING EXPENDITURES

AUDIO VISUALS

CASH VARIANCE -

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
20,000
10,672
2,725
55,513 49,283
33,150
-
24,441
FUEL -
GAS 11,937
44,179
20,455
57,941GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

LEGAL CLAIMS
23,308
-
-
MISC. EXPENSES -

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE

PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

RECRUITMENT EXPENSE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
-
6,624
-
-
7,500 129,000
10,000
8,200
125,000
5,000
3,200
254,79586,739
-
14,708 96,116
- 13,700

SHERIFFS CONTRACT

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
826
46,341
20,000
294,374 199,374
-

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
-
5,000
10,00010,194
6,825
10,000
13,952
12,734
WATER

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
-
-

VEHICLES -
6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
1 1,344
223
65 67,821
17,172
81,725
21,927
FRINGE BENEFITS - 6,158 7,854

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
4,456 207,944 278,386
-
628
6 36,000 45,000

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
54 -
-

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
20,000
168
-
12 123
34,850
9,108 12,193
24,344

OPERATING EXPENDITURES -
126,311
150
5,930
49,283
2,725
13,920
7,350GAS -
-
-
-
-

GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

LEGAL SERVICES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES
54,384
800
-

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
226,815
4,382
-
2,000 2,000
-
-PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
42,601 181,399 107,000
2,000
148,000
7,950
107,557
2,054
138,443
12,947
-

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
WATER
-
- 10,500

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 6220 - YOUTH SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
76 95,383
8,563
7,674
10,000
279,796
982
153,178
33,983
37,840
9,595
FRINGE BENEFITS 14,365 3,113

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
469,653 128,897
56,697
425
90,000 27,000
305,936
5,646

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
2,293
-

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
-
8,630
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
237,440
1,470
399,436

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
14,184 20,571
1,000OPERATING EXPENDITURES -

CASH VARIANCE -

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

COMPUTERS HARDWARE
FUEL
-
84,012
3,668
32,651
28,004
3,808
77,595
31,126
23,308GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES
MISC. EXPENSES

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE

PRINTING/BINDING

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,000

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS
58,391 91,935
-
17,167
110,433
-
- 17,167
37,840
9,595
6230 - COMMUNITY RECREATION PERSONNEL COSTS
3,113
11 101 - GENERAL FUND 6230 - COMMUNITY RECREATION PERSONNEL COSTS FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

PART-TIME SALARIES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

GENERAL LIABILITY

SERVICES
128,897
27,000
195,000
5,646

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
4,447
23,308
50,000
7,500UNIFORMS
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
487
518,802
45,089
46,529
97,520
1,564,797
2 355,268
2,727
8,470
-
542,672
121,811
561,348
137,691
FRINGE BENEFITS 46,368
1,663,872
49,030
1,912,169FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
397,800
156,518
396,000
99,094
-
128,067
1,015,587
-
35,630
- 416,000

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
1,394,887
8,935
83,040
-
1,498,884
72,876 83,753

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

AUDIO VISUALS -

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
-
122,753
242,897
-
910,322
77,449
218,983
239,800
79,218
580
40,798
11,513
174,169
-
186,923
537,817
295,964
150,000
1,167,107
88,514
171,831
394,186
91,564
580
49,268
24,115
183,315
1,083,362
FUEL
GAS 226,635
341,844GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
580
122,536
24,515
204,815
PRINTING/BINDING - 1,500
129,505
1,888,945
1,500
136,302
1,900,775
-

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
119,243
1,428,186

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE
64,582
12,826
147,347
7,600
147,347

TRAFFIC SIGNAGE -

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
46,119 55,060 41,060
VANDALISM 500,000

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
WATER

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
448,777
614,307
38,847
580,747
667,865
105,722
654,492
-
-
-VEHICLES
6310 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE
6400 - RECREACTION

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
FUEL 1,513

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
15 33,213
1,875
5,577
-
24,606
5,872
145,617
35,120
FRINGE BENEFITS 1,898 13,535

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
60,344
523
12,448
86 75,445 496,026
18,000 95,400
LT/ST DISABILITY 663

OTHER BENEFITS -

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
458,287
389
- 500

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE
FUEL
302,484
1,037
9,993
34,461
-
417,757
3,304
28,004
21,726
74,587
335

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

GENERAL LIABILITY
MISC. EXPENSES
10,111 19,126 84,181
4,300

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
655
14,016
37,983
8,392
-
68,328
18,000
11,566
68,328
197,347
22,100
952
6410 - ATHLETICS PERSONNEL COSTS 51
70,746
8,668
5,427
5,000
207,484
-
75,330
18,452
48,571
12,067
FRINGE BENEFITS 7,493
230,967
5,057
165,452FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
47,542
288
36,000 28,800

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
2,449
-

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
143,371
-
4,567
42,812 81,340

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
153,235
1,027
237,576

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
10,095
23,473
10,116
28,004
150
7,247
12,450
150

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
-
-
GENERAL LIABILITY 20,221 57,377 24,861

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
-PRINTING/BINDING 550 700

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

UNIFORMS
100,000
-
69,533
-
119,196
19,994
113,065
19,994

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 6430 - SPECIAL CLASSES PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
23 24,890
2,306
1,678
2,623
74,936
-
27,128
6,259
37,419
9,537
FRINGE BENEFITS 2,077 3,460

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
83,178 127,463
8,422
130
18,000 23,400
LT/ST DISABILITY 328
12 101 - GENERAL FUND 6430 - SPECIAL CLASSES PERSONNEL COSTS OTHER BENEFITS -

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
52,019
-
3,013
62,069
35,561
317
93,521
141,333

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

CASH VARIANCE
3,136
2,480
-
3,643
21,500
5,583
10,000OPERATING EXPENDITURES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

CREDIT CARD CHARGES

GENERAL LIABILITY

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
11,757 28,004
19,126
8,893
80,000
20,20015,166
-
-

PRINTING/BINDING

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
- 500
107,000
60,832
-
500
40,000
4,000
82,293
762
-
9,139 10,761

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 6500 - SPECIAL EVENTS PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
2 3,978
175
1,833
-
30,045
7,955
FRINGE BENEFITS 3,304

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
9,107
5 1,042
9 102,345
14,400
LT/ST DISABILITY 17

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
2,917
-
763

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
170,000
186
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
114,738
355
247,156

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

AUDIO VISUALS
3,405 4,483
85,000
42,500

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

GENERAL LIABILITY

INSURANCE PREMIUM

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
72,822
5,599
200,227
28,004
-
- 13,240
21,500
-
-
310
891,869 1,508,306
25,055
889,758
25,055
-
2,731

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

VEHICLES
-
-
876600 - ARTS AND MUSEUMS PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
117,233
13,010
14,623
10,000
336,848
-
143,010
33,438
159,799
40,909
FRINGE BENEFITS 11,684 14,371

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
438,477 544,336
28,407
489
72,000 90,000

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS
2,099
-

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

PART-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
765,000
12,951
- 19,700

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
663,390
2,816
27,827
18,411
74 767,569
19,206
26,787
23,842
33,415
72,000

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

AUDIO VISUALS

CASH VARIANCE -

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
-
82,745
1,160
21,568
3,937
197,430
10,850
34,650
2,338
94,377
3,382
FUEL 171
-FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT DEP
GAS 5,802 7,050

GENERAL LIABILITY

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

LEGAL SERVICES
32,265
411
76,503 77,692
-

LIABILITIES INSURANCE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
11,877
-
1,883
106
15,587 30,000
6,234
3,000
54,200
3,000
PRINTING/BINDING - 14,707
169,600
22,000

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
16,103 4,350
64,971
82,179
229,958
-
75,260
51,000
267,195
25,500
95,225

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
WATER
11,071
4,951
27,232
2,010
-
6,164
5,000
43,617
4,326
7,942
5,000
1,844

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CALPERS RETIREMENT
10,000 9,500
-
6700 - PERFORMING ARTS CENTER PERSONNEL COSTS 119,479
27,279
11,927
406,990
72,000
231,040
17,826
40,000
29,347
2,200

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

PART-TIME SALARIES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

GENERAL LIABILITY

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
63,677
4,050MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

POSTAGE
11,900
26,000
45,000
79,000
800
680,000
39,000
7,100

PRINTING/BINDING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

PUBLICATIONS/JOURNALS

SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 5,650
13 101 - GENERAL FUND 6700 - PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
9100 - LANCASTER CHOICE ENERGY

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
UNIFORMS 5,000

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
3 4,723
699
246
2,500
14,185
-

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
2,377
19 LT/ST DISABILITY 64

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
488
-
47 WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMPUTERS HARDWARE
FUEL
461
182,373
72 OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
26,846
1,269
30,601
9,868
GENERAL LIABILITY 16,177 27,192
4,090REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
9150 - ENERGY 22
29,056
5,789
1,364
30,813
7,358
FRINGE BENEFITS 5,000 2,866

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
87,468 94,476
-
11,338
124
14,400
LT/ST DISABILITY 695

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
3,034
-
258

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

LEGAL SERVICES
2,552
-
12,651
4,138
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
5,376
-

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
55 -
-
26 980
100
200
100
200
PRINTING/BINDING 43 100 100

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
1,765
120,000
175,000
450,000
200
175,000
80,000
-

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNCOLLECT INT ON RECEIVABLES
- 1,300
(38,343)

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 92,616,401
-
101 - GENERAL FUND Total 113,326,110 109,822,379
11,850
111 - FLEET 1900 - UNASSIGNED
4000 - PUBLIC WORKS
4400 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

TRAINING

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
104
123,320
9,336
6,377
15,000
360,262
-
138,569
32,768
123,930
31,539
FRINGE BENEFITS 10,907 10,454

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
424,862 422,155
54,031
584
89,820
14,683
88,200
14,683
LT/ST DISABILITY 1,532
6,075
-
12,178
-

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

BULK VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS
11,730
1,133
10,666
37,620
18,609
49,455
18,490
28,000
41,851

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
42,471
27,452
-
948
10,000

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC -
FUEL
GAS
429,819
-
460,000 316,459

GENERAL LIABILITY

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
47,520
6,158
7,263
15,149
1,450
-
95,627
9,090
9,000
20,150
300
77,378
9,090
9,000
24,650
300

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES

TELEPHONE

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
WATER
13,043
46,111
-
240,463 127,000
10,500
-
-
1,091
4,314
352,595
-
10,414
336,228

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
19,124
449,083
146,582
2,221,552
170
222,844
24,068
10,040
15,000
671,129
126,240
950
6,900
2,338,971
90,389
500,000
-
1,914,984

VEHICLES
111 - FLEET Total
112 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF
4,396,317
1800 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
265,344
57,845
247,231
59,372

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
20,007
813,564
126,000
20,754
842,163
126,000
LT/ST DISABILITY 2,898
-
17,033
1,906
18,851
-

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

COMPUTERS SOFTWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
5,360 5,360
35,634
-
36,887

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
3,082,714 4,050,507 233,500
2,196,800
5,000-
360
5,000
1,269 1,187
GENERAL LIABILITY 60,402 133,879 108,768
-INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
80,034
1,958
259,194
2,000
400
2,000
400-

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TELEPHONE

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
179,912 2,069,398 223,000
4,090
10,000
407,200
25,000
-
2,681
489,880
10,000
568,600
-
- 25,000
14 112 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF 1800 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

VEHICLE OPERATIONS

WIRELESS
4,459 4,090 3,193
222,200
15,000
247,000
140,000
1810 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-GIS COMPUTERS HARDWARE

COMPUTERS SOFTWARE

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
33,536
-
112 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF Total
113 - GENERAL LIABILITY ISF
5,047,065
25 36,244
10,912
1,584
8,453,092 5,182,105
1320 - RISK MANAGEMENT ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
106,149
26,387
36,273
10,749
FRINGE BENEFITS - 9,482 4,016

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
109,119 325,460 123,561
-
7,765
143
49,500 18,000
LT/ST DISABILITY 1,294

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER
-
-
5,418
-

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
305

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
3,012
-
26,180
14,255 5,412
2,019

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
10,033
2,019-
-
GAS -

LEGAL CLAIMS

LEGAL SERVICES
242,453
502,648
2,923,700
300,000
350,000
3,434,014
1,150
300,000
350,000
4,464,218
1,150

LIABILITIES INSURANCE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
-
-
- 200 200

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SERVICES
-
-
100,000 100,000

TELEPHONE -

TRAINING -

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
WATER
-
-
-
1,000
4,729,649
150,000
1,000
1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT 14,574 3,885,375113 - GENERAL LIABILITY ISF Total
120 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
5,416,598
1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL COSTS TEMPORARY SALARIES

DEBT SERVICES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES
-
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
1100 - CITY COUNCIL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 153,188 150,000 1200 - CITY CLERK
1800 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1900 - UNASSIGNED

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
-
-

PERSONNEL COSTS HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LEGAL CLAIMS
2,785,339 1,818,128
25,000
1,080,580
-
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE OPERATING EXPENDITURES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES -

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 120 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Total
141 - EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
2,938,527 1,993,128 1,230,580
1200 - CITY CLERK CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES -
-
-
-
-
-
-
1400 - HUMAN RESOURCES
1700 - FINANCE AND IT
2400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
3000 - PUBLIC SAFETY
4100 - MAINTENANCE OPERATING EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST

DEBT SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES -

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES - 4400 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE OPERATING EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST

DEBT SERVICES
-
46,382

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES 157,670
6000 - PARCS
6200 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST

DEBT SERVICES
752
17,956

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
25,528
70,506
31,133
326,588
-
-

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES -
20,625 2,000
6400 - RECREACTION
6600 - ARTS AND MUSEUMS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES -
-
141 - EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Total 339,418 359,720 -
199 - COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION 1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION 1100 - CITY COUNCIL

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

ADVERTISING
25,768
-

GRANT EXPENSE -
MISC. EXPENSES 25

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

GRANT EXPENSE

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

GRANT EXPENSE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

GRANT EXPENSE
-
-1900 - UNASSIGNED
4000 - PUBLIC WORKS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
1,689
-
-
-
7,666
-
6,000
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
6200 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE
6400 - RECREACTION
6500 - SPECIAL EVENTS

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

GRANT EXPENSE
-
-
-
6600 - ARTS AND MUSEUMS OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
199 - COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION Total 41,148
201 - AQMD 1900 - UNASSIGNED GENERAL LIAB ISF 1,588
GRANT EXPENSE 47,500 50,000

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT
3,691
1,588
3,691
-
3000 - PUBLIC SAFETY
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
-
-
201 - AQMD Total
202 - LA COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT
52,779 50,000 5,279
-
1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION
2200 - HOUSING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

GRANT EXPENSE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

GRANT EXPENSE

GRANT EXPENSE

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS
-
-
-
155,267
6000 - PARCS
6200 - COMMUNITY SERVICES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 51,675
-
4,218,738
6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES OPERATING EXPENDITURES 22,591 5,948
1,942

FULL-TIME SALARIES

GRANT EXPENSE

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

WORKERS' COMPENSATION
76,953
2,862,642
18,000
3,371
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE
6500 - SPECIAL EVENTS

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES - -OPERATING EXPENDITURES GRANT EXPENSE 480,000
SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES 480,000
202 - LA COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT Total
203 - PARK BOND
51,675 4,854,005 3,471,446
1900 - UNASSIGNED
6600 - ARTS AND MUSEUMS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
-
-
-
-203 - PARK BOND Total
15 210 - MEASURE A
211 - MEASURE M
1900 - UNASSIGNED
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT -
-
-
121,037
210 - MEASURE A Total 121,037
6,363,9061900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
1,621,790
2,220
5,513
124,098
1,500
177,580
382,905
4200 - TRANSPORTATION
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
4700 - CAPITAL ENGINEERING
1900 - UNASSIGNED
343,048
-
171,751 4,000
43,357
609,341

OPERATING EXPENDITURES PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE - 211 - MEASURE M Total
212 - MEASURE R Total
1,925,371
1,122,253
1,480
-
6,706,954
1,081,420212 - MEASURE R OPERATING EXPENDITURES INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 1,500
1,500
4100 - MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS VEHICLES 1,123,733 1,081,420
213 - METRO- LOCAL
213 - METRO- LOCAL Total
1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT 57,474 57,474
214 - GAS TAX 1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION
1400 - HUMAN RESOURCES
1800 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
FUEL -
-
-
-
-

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

GENERAL LIAB ISF
24 24
1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES 6,086 6,086
239,631
471,998
25,504
-

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS
471,998
643,971
2000 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2100 - PLANNING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
10,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
2600 - BEAUTIFICATION PERSONNEL COSTS 114,123
28,983
10,274
388,747
54,000
22,509
17,027
25,000
21,025
46,450
619,900
5,000

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

TEMPORARY SALARIES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

DAMAGE REPAIRSOPERATING EXPENDITURES

ELECTRIC

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES
STREET SWEEPING 1,441,648
5,000UNIFORMS
WATER 188,289
3000 - PUBLIC SAFETY
4000 - PUBLIC WORKS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
FUEL - 1,269

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
4,888
-
-
-
343

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
FUEL
-
23,646
66 653
-
-
48,454
35,728
62,100

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
1,473,336

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

TRAINING

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
85,330
4100 - MAINTENANCE 518
520,622
39,283
27,069
-
599,403
142,634
490,625
125,204
FRINGE BENEFITS 48,338 41,392

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
1,562,897
1 1,837,808 1,671,257
434,309
2,901
8,298
63,510
39,690
13,404
235,183
5,217
49,105
-
424,800
120,454
374,400
120,454
320,938

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

SALARIES- OTHER

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

ADVERTISING
181,796
320,938
80,496
1,437,608
73,201
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES
-

COMPUTERS HARDWARE

DAMAGE REPAIRS

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
-
67,160
-
60,000 20,000
-
FUEL

GRAFITTI REMOVAL
139,631
52,636
-
9,106
14,202
92,648
152,067
-
75,496
296,744
81,142
294,190

MARKING AND STRIPING

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
10,738
69,366
56,678
245,326
11,650
98,035
79,230
5,830

PRINTING/BINDING -

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SERVICES
716,865
581,838
-
934,525
988,743
1,042,125
414,050

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TIDE CLEAN UPS

TRAFFIC SIGNAGE
8,011
23,166
-
28,605
11,000
50,000

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

TRAINING
-
100

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS

VEHICLE OPERATIONS
WATER
10,949
41,109
786,246
16,736
9,028
15,312
147
28,050
45,005
1,369,677
17,198
40,000
833,329
17,198

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER
14,735
4200 - TRANSPORTATION PERSONNEL COSTS

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
171,985
12,316
8,937
-
188,251
36,874
180,202
41,200
FRINGE BENEFITS 15,832 16,150

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
548,312
971
141,620
824
577,191 613,839
117,180 121,500
LT/ST DISABILITY 2,230
16 214 - GAS TAX 4200 - TRANSPORTATION PERSONNEL COSTS OVER-TIME SALARIES 28,342 8,067
39,957
1,722
14,825
-
152,669
116,597
13,318
80,075
45,946
80,075
36,436
26,886

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

DAMAGE REPAIRS
25,281
-
312,638
155,000
13,830

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
29,705
155,000
16,911
-
57,370
5,000
7,000
300

ELECTRIC
FUEL

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

MARKING AND STRIPING

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAFFIC SIGNAGE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

TRAFFIC SIGNAL-MULTI JURSTICT

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
42,578
6,513
2,934
298
15,695
5,122
-
57,370
5,000
7,000
300
105,372 27,500
35,000
90,685
746,815
65,000
90,685105,518
518,302 -
-
2,375
10,026 9,185 9,185
VEHICLE OPERATIONS 147,969 280,545 158,920

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES
10,022
28,297 40,800 31,300

VEHICLES -
4300 - UTILITY SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
2 2,273
152
135

FRINGE BENEFITS -
FULL-TIME SALARIES 1,850

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
1,764
11 LT/ST DISABILITY 24
OVER-TIME SALARIES 7,384
290
131
26 21,440
20,000
21,440
20,000

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE
197
-
-
14,070
182,745
131,955
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 43,404
-
22,700
50,199
675,751
43,404
22,700
4400 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBERPERSONNEL COSTS -

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
77,498
19,613
FRINGE BENEFITS - 7,856
FULL-TIME SALARIES - 263,988
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
36,000

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

DAMAGE REPAIRS
-
-
11,563
483,459OPERATING EXPENDITURES 483,459
3,96626,251

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
-
-
FUEL 1,058

MARKING AND STRIPING

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

TRAFFIC SIGNAGE
-
1,000
17,057
-
-
-
3,771

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVICES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
56,681
595
12,155
2,990
-
-
-

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGES

VEHICLES -
4700 - CAPITAL ENGINEERING PERSONNEL COSTS CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS
-
-
-
34,247
9,321
2,646

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE
FUEL

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
-
-
-
116,657
9,900
5,110
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 2,990 2,990
6000 - PARCS
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
PERSONNEL COSTS 12
18,935
1,704
1,057

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
56,798
-
12,785
69 LT/ST DISABILITY 250

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
898
15,974
203

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ELECTRIC
2,008
6,510OPERATING EXPENDITURES
FUEL -
INACTIVE 21,631

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
114
115
-

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
510,556 102,253 -
-
-

UNIFORMS -
WATER 186,525
214 - GAS TAX Total
216 - TDA 3 Total
10,323,552 13,925,200 14,529,678
216 - TDA 3
217 - TDA 8
1900 - UNASSIGNED
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

MARKING AND STRIPING
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 - CITY COUNCIL
1900 - UNASSIGNED
3000 - PUBLIC SAFETY
4100 - MAINTENANCE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

ADVERTISING
INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT 7,952,645 5,869,807
15,000
-
-
-
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES 19,030
19,030217 - TDA 8 Total 7,952,645 5,884,807
17 218 - PROPOSITION A 1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION
1900 - UNASSIGNED

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT
-
40,938
1,504,665
83,210
132,359 132,359
20,110
1,610,0901,610,090
83,210
4000 - PUBLIC WORKS
4100 - MAINTENANCE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
118
--
-
118
30,000 98,926 94,126
4700 - CAPITAL ENGINEERING
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE

PERSONNEL COSTS

PERSONNEL COSTS
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,081

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
497

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
-
-

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
4 -

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES -
PART-TIME SALARIES 28,683

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES
-
34,668 28,683
UNEMPLOYMENT 97

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
957
-
8,252
95,673

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
22,110
7,760
330,428
2,313,684
22,110
7,760
233,760
2,149,116218 - PROPOSITION A Total
219 - PROPOSITION B
219 - PROPOSITION B Total
220 - PROPOSITION C
1,800,043
1900 - UNASSIGNED INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

COMPUTERS HARDWARE
4100 - MAINTENANCE
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS VEHICLES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
4700 - CAPITAL ENGINEERING
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE
4100 - MAINTENANCE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
220 - PROPOSITION C Total
221 - PROP 42- CONGESTION MGT OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT
17,783
17,783221 - PROP 42- CONGESTION MGT Total
222 - SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGR 1900 - UNASSIGNED
222 - SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Total
14,620
14,620
223 - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFTEY 2100 - PLANNING ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSEOPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

TRAINING
GRANT EXPENSE4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
223 - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFTEY Total
224 - RECYCLING 1900 - UNASSIGNED OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
2000 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

GRANT EXPENSE
MISC. EXPENSES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

PRINTING/BINDING

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE

VEHICLES
2200 - HOUSING PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

SERVICES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

TEMPORARY SALARIES

GRANT EXPENSE

CALPERS RETIREMENT

FICA/MEDICARE

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
2700 - ENVIRONMENTAL
4200 - TRANSPORTATION

PERSONNEL COSTS

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
51,030
333,808
2,866
458

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
10,249
87 865
28,795
-
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
108,054
-26,037
4300 - UTILITY SERVICES -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE
18 224 - RECYCLING 4300 - UTILITY SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS LIFE INSURANCE -

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE
-
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 51,631 -
MISC. EXPENSES -

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES
-
-
-

CAPITAL OUTLAY AND REPLACEMENTS EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE - 6000 - PARCS PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
480
-
84 FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
5,795
16 56,120

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES
160
-
-
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 272,662
436,836
-
224 - RECYCLING Total 127,524 384,838
230 - STATE GRANTS- OTHER 1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION
1900 - UNASSIGNED
2100 - PLANNING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

GRANT EXPENSE

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

GRANT EXPENSE
-
-
29,017 239,634
967,515
283,654

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
32,485
2200 - HOUSING PERSONNEL COSTS -
-
-
-

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

GRANT EXPENSE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

GRANT EXPENSE

GRANT EXPENSE
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
161,159 1,774,875 1,774,875
60,000
-
-2400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
122,093
3300 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
4600 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
60,000
-8,722

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
153,175 166,825
6300 - FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL COSTS -
-
-
-

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE

GRANT EXPENSE
-
-
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
9100 - LANCASTER CHOICE ENERGY
9150 - ENERGY SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES 134,744
230 - STATE GRANTS- OTHER Total
300 - FEDERAL GRANTS- OTHER
506,650 3,343,593 2,118,529
1000 - CITY ADMINISTRATION
1900 - UNASSIGNED
2100 - PLANNING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

GRANT EXPENSE -

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
430,853
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSEOPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

POSTAGE

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE
2200 - HOUSING
OPERATING EXPENDITURES 2,327,998 2,327,998
122,526REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

GRANT EXPENSE

FICA/MEDICARE

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE
2400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
3100 - COMMUNITY SAFTEY

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE
ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER4300 - UTILITY SERVICES
19 300 - FEDERAL GRANTS- OTHER 4300 - UTILITY SERVICES PERSONNEL COSTS CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
-
6430 - SPECIAL CLASSES PERSONNEL COSTS
-

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
-
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES -
300 - FEDERAL GRANTS- OTHER Total
301 - HOMELAND SECURITY
301 - HOMELAND SECURITY Total
310 - CDBG
430,853 2,327,998 2,450,524
260,000
260,000
1900 - UNASSIGNED
1710 - ACCOUNTING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT -
-
7ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
10,225
946
464
9,877
1,698
FRINGE BENEFITS - 857
30,285
4,500

FULL-TIME SALARIES

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
30,779
4,159
40 LT/ST DISABILITY 136

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

UNEMPLOYMENT
185
89 WORKERS' COMPENSATION

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
882
14,574
1,326
1900 - UNASSIGNED
2400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS -
-
-
-

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
-
3200 - CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL COSTS
-

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

TRAINING

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
PERSONNEL COSTS6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES
-
-

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADVERTISING
-
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES 4,600

DEBT SERVICES

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS
FUEL
205,845 205,845 205,845
205,845
-
-
GRANT EXPENSE (124,998) 286,867

NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
-
118,354 316,023
273,49824
-
261,711310 - CDBG Total 1,135,376
312 - NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION 2200 - HOUSING
6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

GRANT EXPENSE -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE

FRINGE BENEFITS

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

OTHER BENEFITS

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSEOPERATING EXPENDITURES
20 312 - NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION
312 - NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION Total
313 - HOME GRANT
6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES
1900 - UNASSIGNED

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES -
-

GENERAL LIAB ISF -
719
-

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
719
318
-
-
-
-
2200 - HOUSING PERSONNEL COSTS

FULL-TIME SALARIES -
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

TEMPORARY SALARIES

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS

SHERIFFS CONTRACT

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
1,657,393 2,804,046
6210 - COMMUNITY SERVICES HOMES

FULL-TIME SALARIES -

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

UNEMPLOYMENT
-
-

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

GRANT EXPENSE
-
-OPERATING EXPENDITURES

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
313 - HOME GRANT Total
314 - LOW-MODERATE INCOME HOUSING
1,037 1,657,393 2,804,765
-1900 - UNASSIGNED GENERAL LIAB ISF

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ISF

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES

ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
90,464
98,385
90,464
24,365
-
2000 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2200 - HOUSING

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL COSTS
12,200
74 104,641
23,167
5,056
-
109,696
24,082
123,105
27,624
FRINGE BENEFITS 9,880 11,424

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE

LT/ST DISABILITY

PARS RETIREMENT
314,748
-
45,215
416
2,945
-
336,337 419,344
45,000 54,000

RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS

UNEMPLOYMENT

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD

ADVERTISING
8,356
895
8,819
-
14,732
36,773
3,000
1,000
776
2,538
500
1,500
18,367
36,773
3,000

OPERATING EXPENDITURES
-

DUES & MEMBERSHIPS

ELECTRIC
FUEL
476
204
2,472
553
-
776
500GAS

GOVERNMENT FEES/LICENSES

GRANT EXPENSE -

INTER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT

MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
MISC. EXPENSES

OPERATING MATERIALS & SUPPLIES

POSTAGE
-
5,794
484
-
83 5,700
1,731
500
1,600
400
500
1,600
400PRINTING/BINDING 65

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE

REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SPECIAL ACTIVITY SUPPLIES

TRAINING
63,853
1,871
794,960
20,000
200
794,960
20,000
200-
- 500

TRAVEL/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT

UNIFORMS
-
-
3,500
250 250
WATER - 4,500 4,500
2400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL COSTS ACCIDENTAL DEATH DISMEMBER

CALPERS RETIREMENT

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

FICA/MEDICARE
-
-
-
-

FRINGE BENEFITS -

FULL-TIME SALARIES
H.S.A. CONTRIBUTION

HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE

LIFE INSURANCE
-
-
-
-

LT/ST DISABILITY -

OTHER BENEFITS -

OVER-TIME SALARIES

PARS RETIREMENT
-
-