Financing of ongoing operation and maintenance U.rerFee. r of the public facilities and services is another
important element of the overall financing I'rimarily charged by utility providers, user fees program for the CLSP. The City is to operate and . may be charged to pay for the cost of sen-ices. For maintain all public facilities in the CLSP with the
example, the City, through its Public Works
exception of those operated and maintained by
vepartment, will determine and assess a user fee
special service providers. For eYample, the
for water and sewer services in the CLSP- 2
reclamation district maintains levees.
mendment Plan Area.
A Landscape and Lighting District or a I Tello Roos
Kegional Trcrn.+iortation I%eee
CFD Services District may be formed to assist in In 1990, San Joaquin voters passed the Measure K funding of the ongoing operation and maintenance Ordinance and Espenditure Plan ( Measure K), of street rights of ways and other components. W ch establishes and implements a 1/ 2- cent sales tax for transportation purposes up to year 2011.
A detailed operation and maintenance budget is to
Measure K provides for the unplementation ofthe
be developed for each public facility and service
San Joaquin E penditure Plan, resulting in
prior to the recordation of the first tentarive tract
county-wide transportation facility and ser- ice
map in the CLSP-?. The budget vill identify the
provements including highway, public transit,
appropriate sources of funds and the agencies
railroad grade crossing, and passenger rail
responsible Eor maintenance and operation of the
improvements.
facilities and services.
In addition, the San Joaquin Council
The City intends to utilize a
variety of financing Governments, the regional planning agency for measures for operation and maintenance. iliese
San Joaquin County, established a county vide
measures include but are not limited to:
regional transportation impact fee ( R"I'IF.
Prof erty Tcrxe. r
trgation Fees
I'he City receives a
portion of the 1- percent Payment of fees may be required to mitigate the property ta paid by all residential and commercial pact( s) that the development of the CLSP- 2 has property o vners within the City limits. 1 s the on the environment and esisting development.
CI,SP de elops, the incremental property tai is to
be used to pay for the services requited by new
Specicrll. rsess nestt
residents. In addition, existing special districts, like Special assessments may be charged to the CLSPthe Lathrop- I lanteca Fire District, that also receive 2 lmendment users to pay for operation and a direct allocation of the 1- percent propert ta,
maintenance of public infrastructure. Special
will use the incremental taxes to provide required assessments cannot e ceed the cost of providing services. Property taxes are likely to be the primar services and are limited to special beneFt funding source for operation and maintenance of propertics subject to the assessment received. T'he the special districts. most commonly known and widel used special assessment is a Landscape and Lighting District,
Sale Ta es
enabled by the Landscape and Lighting r ct of 1972
Retail establishments in the CLSP- 2 rlmendment Streets and F- ighways Code Section 22 00 et seq.).
Plan 1rea generate sales tax revenues for the City.
These taXes, of which the City receives a large S ieczal Taxe. r portion, are to be used by the City to pa,y for sello Roos Community Facilities Districts ( CFD) services provided to its ne v and e
isting residents. also allo v for collection of special tases to fund
operations and maintenance of facilities built or recendy been established. Further investigation of financed with CFD bond proceeds. The operations potential funding sources is appropriate. FIo vever, and maintenance costs funded by the special taxes since the availability of funding from these sources have to be new costs associated with the new is unknown, it has not been assumed that these development. The special taxes cannot be used to sources would be available for development replace general fund revenues. financing.
Dedicatioras and Exactions An eaample would be the EIFD for funding 200- y ear flood control improvements for the Fix in
Under the Subdivision Map Act, developers may Place Project. be required to dedicate land or make cash
payments for public facilities required or affected ReimbursementAgreements by their project ( e. g., Yoad right- of-wa fronting
individual properties). Dedications are typically Each benefiting property in the CI, SP- 2 made for road and utility rights- of-wa}, park sites, lmendment Plan r rea is required to pay its fair and land for other public facilities. Cash share of the backbone infrastructure and public contributions are made for other public facilities facilities construction, maintenance, and land that are directly required by their projects ( e. g.,
acquisition costs. I'o the extent a developer or
payments for a traffic signal). landowner may be required to dedicate land for public purpose; fund the acquisition, construction,
Developrtentll reemertts or operation and maintenance, or othercvise contribute to the provision of public facilities
The City and developers in the CLSP- 2 may enter and/ or services ( including the oversizing of such into development agreements. These agreements facilities); finance the preparation of this Specific
outline responsibilities for financing and
Plan amendment and the processing of the related
construction of backbone infrastructure and public entidements including anne ation; or incur costs facilities, as vell as for funding of ongoing related to the legal defense of such entitlements in operations and maintenance of the facilities and
e cess of his or her fair share to the benefit of other services in the CLSP-? I mendment Plan r rea.
properties, a revnbursement mechanism shall be
I"hc Cit may design and build the required
executed to ensure a fair- share cost allocauon
infrastructure and public facilities and fund the
among all properties. The reimbursement
construction through collection of development
mechanism can be in the form of a benefit or
impact fees, issuance of bonds, or any other
another type of a financing district, a private or
appropriate financing mechanism. If a developer is
public reimbursement agreement, and/ or anyrequired to design and build the improvements, fee other appropriate arrangement that can guarantee
credits and acquisirion agreements with the City or a fair allocation of costs. other public agencies may- be utilized along with
issuance of bonds, pri ate fmancing, and other fair share cost allocation shall be implemented funding mechanisms.
through the Financing Plan for on- and off-site
improvements, based on net costs aftex accounung Federal and State Grarat' for any Federal, State, regional, ox other public
The Cin has in the past received funding for public funding that may have been obtained. facilities from other levels of government,
including the State and federal government.
Historically, these funding sources were more
available; however, several sources of grant
funding still remain and several new programs have
Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark- Up ATTACHMENT 4 New text is shown by underline; deleted text is shown by * r;' o*, r^„, Chapter 17. 62 Central Lathrop Zoning Districts
Article 6. IL- CL: Limited Industrial Zonin District
17. 62. 061 Purposes and application.
The IL- CL district is intended to provide opportunities for certain types of limited industcial uses to provide adec ate space to meet the needs of modern industrial development, includin offstreet parkin and tcuck loading areas; and to provide industrial employment opportunities fior residents of the citv and region. The IL desi nation accommodates a wide ran r job - eneratin
uses, inc( uding business parks; clean li ht industrial; research and development R& D); science. technology, en ineerin, and math ( STEM; tech/ biotech manufacturing; high-teeh services that incorporate some combination of assembly, warehousin, and/ or sales, hospitals and other hea( th care- related uses, varehouses and distribution centers. ecial provisions a plv to properties located between Dos Reis Road and De Lima Road. See Section 17. 62. 068.
17. 62. 062 Permitted uses.
A. Li ht industrial and related uses, includin
1. Off-street parkin lots improved in conformitv with Chapter 17. 76;
2. Assembly of small electric a pliances, such as liglltin tixtures, irons, fans, toasters and electric toys, refri erators, washin machines, dryers, dishwashers and similar home appliances;
3. Assembly of small electrical equipment. such as home motion picture eql ip nent, stereos. video cameras and cadio and television receivers but not includin electrical machinerv;
4. Manufacture of scientific, medical, denta( and drafti instruments, orthopedic and medical appliances, cameras and photo raphic equipment, except film, electronic equipment, musical instruments, precision instruments, optical oods, watches and clocks;
5. Manufacture of ceramic products. such as potter urines and small lazed ti( e;
6. Manufacturin, assemb( in 7.,, compoundin, packa in and processin of cosmetics, dru s, pharmaceuticals.( not includin re tinin„,7or renderin of fats or oils) and toi( etries:
Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark-Up ATTACHMENT 4
7. Manufacture and assembly of electrica( supplies, such as coils, condensers, crystal holders, insulation, lamps, switches and wire and cable assemblv, provided no noxious or offensive fumes or odors are produced:
8. Manufacture of cutlerv, hardware, hand tools and furniture. dve and pattern making, metal stamping and extrusion of small products, such as costume jewelr pins and needles, razor blades. bottle caps. buttons and kitchen rtensils;
9. Manufacturin, assemblin . compoundin packa in , c rating and processing of articles or merchandise from the followin previousl prepared materials: bone, canvas, cello,phane, cellulose, cloth, cork, feathers, felt, fiber and synthetic fiber, fur, ( ass. hair, horn, leather, paint ( not emplovin, a boilingprocess), paper, plastics, precious or semiprecious metals or stones, rubber and svnthetic rubber, shell, straw, textiles, tobacco and vood:
10. Manufacturin, assemblin , compounding, processin;, packagin or treatment ofi such products as bakery ; oods, candy, dairy products, food products, including fruits and vegetables, but not includina fish and meat products, pickles, sauerkraut, vine ar or yeast, or refining oc renderin of fats and oils;
11. Blacksmith shops, boat building, electric motor rebuilding, machine shops and paint shops;
12. Gasoline service stations, including dispensin of diesel, natural as, and ( iquid petroleum gas fuels and complete truck service;
13. Lumber yards, includin plannin mills and saw mills; mattress manufacture; storage yards for commercial vehicles or feed; tlour, feed and ; eain mills;, grain elevators;
14. Man fact re and maintenance of electric and neon siUns. billboards and commercial advertisin structures;
15. Public utilitv and pub( ic service structures and facilities, such as communications eqliipment buildin s, electric distribution substations, electric transmission si bstations. as re, ulator stations, pumping stations, public utilitv service yards, corporation acds, railcoad ri hts- of-way and stations. reservoirs and storaae tanks:
16. Public buildin s and grounds.
17. Incidental and accessory structures and uses such as retail, office, etc., located on the same site as a permitted use;
18. Wineries and wine cellars, small, medium and lar
19. Business parks and incubator spaces;
20. Research development industry and business sup ort services; Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark- Up ATTACHMENT 4
21. Warehouse and distribution facilities;
22. Other uses which are added to this list according to the procedure i Section 17. 16. 020.
17. 62. Ob3 Permitted uses— Administrative approval required.
A. T' he followin; uses mav be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17. 108:
1. Gas and electric transmission lines in accordance with Section 17. 108. 080:
2. Watchpersons' livin- quarters incidental to and on the same site with a permitted limited industrial use;
3. Mobile or modular offices in accordance with the requirements of mobile or modular offices;
4. Other uses tivhich have been added to this list according to tlle procedure i Section 17. 16. 020;
5. Temporary uses pursuant to Section 17. 108. 090.
17. 62. 064 Conditional uses
A. The followin uses mav be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17. 1 12:
l. Hospitals;
2. Bulk storage and deliver. quefied petroleum
3. Fxcavations accordin to the requirements of Chapter l 7. 88;
4. Expansion, remodelin, or additions to a conditional use that are not co lsidered an incidental or accessocy use as defined in Section 17. 04. 080;
5. Outdc or vendin stalls for the sale or trade of ne v and used articles at specitied ti nes ofi the day and week as either a temporar pecmanent use of land;
6. Other uses which are added to this list accordin 7
t e pcocedure in Section 17. 16. 020;
17. 62. 065 Property development standards.
All uses shalf be consistent witl Article 12, Development Standards, of this chaptec. Where development standards are not specifica( Iy identified in this document, reference the citv of Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark- Up ATTACHMENT 4 Lathrop Zoning Ordinance.
17. 62. 066 Site plan and architectural design re iew.
No use shall be erected on any lot or site in anv IL distcict until a site plan and architectural plans shall have been submitted to and approved by the city pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 17. 100 and 17. 104. Desi n review is required for all proposed structures, whether residential or nonresidential, together with related site plans, landscapin, and public improvements associated with new development within the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 area.
17. 62. 067 Citv Council Review.
All development proiects proposed north of Dos Reis Road and South of De Lima Road shall obtain a Conditio lal Use Permit. PropertY located in this area is subject to discretionary review bX the City Council with recommendation from the Plannin Commission. Proposed developtnent and uses mav be pertnitted in accordance with the provisions of Cha ter 17. 1 12, except that the City Counci( serves as the final reviewin authorit
17. 62. 068 General provisions and exceptions.
All uses shall be subject ta the general provisions and exceptions in Chapter 17. 16, except if a development project is proposed north of Dos Reis Road and South of De Lima Road, the Planning Gommission serves as a recommendin bodv to the City Co ncil. The Citv Co u cil reserves the rin
t to provide discretionary review.
The community development director mav approve use interpretations and minor deviations elated to 'the zoning herein.
Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark- Up ATTACHMENT 4 Article 12. Non- Residential Development Standards
Table 17. 62. 120 A Central Lathrop Specific Plan: Non- Residential Site Development Standards Office Neighborhood Park( P- CL) Residential Public/ Semi- Public/ Commercial Commercial Mixed- Use Neighborhood
CO- CL) NGCL) R/ MU- CL) Commercial
P/ SP/ NGCL
Lathrop
a' 0 n/ a' 0 0
Center District
Golden Valley 0 l0 n/ a n/ a' n/ a'
Parkway
Other Streets 10 n/ a' 10 n/ a 10
Other
Setbacks
Front, Rear
and Side 0 0 0 0 0
Yards
Height
Re uirements
Maximum
Building 75 45 45 65 45
Hei ht'
Special Tower
a 70 70 70 70
Elements
Minimum
Building n/ a 15 1 IS 15
Hei ht
Building
Se aration
Standard Per CBC' Per CBC' Per CBC' Per CBC s Per CBC'
Pedestrian
15 IS 15 15 15
Access Width
Lot Size and
Covera e
Minimum
None None None None None
Parcel Area
Minimum
None None None None None
Width
Minimum
None None None None None
De th
Maximum
0. 60 0. 60 0. 60 4. 0 0. 60
FAR
Maximum
70% 60% 70% 90% 70%
Covera e
Off-Street
Parkin
Remainder of
stall per 400 net usable sq. ft. for office; other uses per Chapter ( 7. 76 of the Lathrop Municipal Code CLSP Notes to Table 17. 62. 120
1 n/ a= not applicable.
2 Building or parking area fronting any public street - measured from property line or right- ofway.
Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark- Up ATTACHMENT 4 3 Exceptions to maximum height may be granted through Design Review for towers, steeples, cupolas, dormers, flagpoles and other architectural elements. 4 Minimum width between structures when pedestrian access way provided. 5 California Bui( din Code.
6 Reductions of parking standards may be granted for shared parking subject to approval of a parking study concurrent with Design Review.
Table 17. 62. 120 B Central Lathrop Specific Plan: [ ndustrial Development Standards IL-CL
Minimlun Parcel Size ( sfl 5, 000
Minimt m Lot
W idth 50'
Depth 100'
Street Fronta e 50'
Minimum setbacks
Front Yard 15'
Side Yard 0' 2}
Rear Yard 0' '
Distance Between Structures Per CBC
Maximum Lot Covera e 70%
Maximum Buildin Height 76' '
Landscape Requicements 4
Landscape Covera e
10%
Minimu n)
5 Per Lathrop Zonin Parkin Requirements
p dinance, Chapter 17J6
Per Master Signa e
Si na e Pro ram, and/ or
Chapter 17. 84
Footnotes to ' I able 17. 62. 120 B:
Minimum standards may need to be revised based on parcel confi; uration and proposed land use; Community Development Director to approve minor deviations. l) Those sites with public street fronta e on a curve or cul- de- sac may have fronta es of not ess than 40', provided that the width of the site as rneasured along the front ard setback line is at least 50'.
Central Lathrop Zoning Districts— Chapter 17. 62 Mark- Up ATTACHMENT 4 2) Except where abuttin an eKisting adjacent residential use, the minimi m setback shall be 1 S'.
3 The buildinQ hei ht shall be no greater than sevent - six 76) feet, unless a tal( er buildin hei ht is determined to be warcanted by the approvi 1 authoritv. 4) For landscape standards reference Chapter 17. 92 of the Lathrop Municipal Code. 5) Measured as a percenta e of net lot acrea e.
Ord. 22- 431 § 1; Ord. 08- 276 § 1)
l
Attachment 5
Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment No. TA- 23- 104
Environmental Checklist, prepared by De Novo Planning Group, dated August, 2023
Due to the size of this document, it has not been reproduced in the staff report. A copy of the Environmental Checklist is available for viewing and download on the City' s website at the following links:
Environmental Checklist without Appendices:
https:// www. ci. lathrop. ca. us/ sitesJdefault/ files/ fileattachments/ comm unity development/ pa e/ 5622/ lathrop ashley warehouse 15183 no appendices. pdf
Environmental Checklist with Appendices:
https:// www. ci. lathrop. ca. us/ sites/ default/ files/ fileattachments/ comm unity developmentJpa eJ5622/ lathrop ashley warehouse 15183 cle an. pdf
The Environmental Checklist can also be viewed at the following link:
https:// www. ci. lathrop. ca. us/ com- dev/ pa e/ public- review- documents Individuals that are unable to access the Environmental Checklist at the website listed above or would require a computer disk or thumb drive containing a copy of the document should contact Planning Staff at plannin @ci. lathrop. ca. us or ( 209) 941- 7290 to obtain a copy.
ATT, C H I E NT " "
CITY OF LATHROP
PLANNING COMiVIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 23- 12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LATHROP
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL FIND THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21083. 3 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 151$ 3 AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND A MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDiVIENT TO CHAPTER
17. 62, CENTRAL LATHROP ZO1V' ING DISTRICTS OF THE LATHROP MUNICIPAL CODE ( TA- 23- 104)
WHEREAS, Section 65450 et. sec. of the California Government Code provides for the preparation and adoption of Specific Plans by general law cities for implementation of all ar part of an adopted Generai Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 65453 of the California Government Code provides that a Specific Plan may be adopted or amended by either Resolution or Ordinance as provided by the local jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase Amendment and Zoning Code Text Amendment applies only to Phase 2 ( the project) and does not in any way apply to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 1 Project; and
WHEREAS, the AmendmenC to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it affects Central I..athrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amenciment is a stand- alone document for the Phase 2 portion of Central Lathrop; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Cade Section 65090, notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in accordance with State law in at leask one newspaper of general circulation within the City of Lathrop at least ten calendar days before the Planning Commission' s public hearing; and
WHEREAS, prior to the CiCy' s approval of the 2022 General Plan Update, the City prepared an Environmentai Impact Report ( EIR) which analyzed the environmental impacts of buildout under the General Plan Update pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) ( Publie Resourees Code SecCion 21000, et seq.}, and the Lathrop City Council certified the General Plan Update Final EIR on September 19, 2022 ( State Clearinghouse # 20211Q0139),; and
WHEREAS, the analysis in the General Plan Update EIR allows the use af CEQA exemptionlstreamlining provisions for projects developed under the General Plan Update, including the proposed Project; and
Planning Commission Resolution No. 23- 12 Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as it affects the Phase 2 Project, is an amendment to the adopted 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, which was adopted by Resolution No. 04- 1779 on November 9, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City intends to retain the 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan as the governing land use regulations for certain specified portions af the Specific Plan area including properties within the Phase 1 Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment amends Chapter 17. 62, Ceratral L tthr-op Zoning Districts to implemcnt the Central Lathrap Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 17. 124 of the Lathrop Municipal Code mandates that the Planning Commission transmit its recommendation to the City Council by resolution; and WHEREAS, proper notice of this p ibiic hearing was given in all respects as required by law including the publishing of a legal notice of the hearing in the Manteca Bulletin on or about August 31, 2023 and mailed out to property awners located within a 300- foot radius from the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment Project area on August 31, 2023, emailed to the City' s Public Hearing subscribers and interesCed parties and posted at three ( 3) locations accessible to the public; and
WHEREAS, the Pianning Comnnission has utilized its own independent judgement in adopting this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Planning Commission of the City of Lathrop does hereby make the following findings:
Section l. This Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it affects the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment Project, as shown in Attachment 2 of the Planning Commission Staff Report, relaCive to the proposed developmellt of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment Project area on certain real property consisting of approximately 724- acres located in the City of Lathrop.
Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Findings. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083. 3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
l. The project complies with CEQA based on the CEQA exemption/ streamlining provisions contained in Public Resources Code section 21083. 3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183;
Plannin Commission ReSotution No. 23- 12 Pabe 2 of 6
2. Pursuant to the Planning Commission Staff Report and the attachments and exhibits thereto, including but nat limited to, the Environmental Checklist, prepared by De Novo Planning Group, dated August, 2423, which are incorporated herein by reference, the proposed Project will not result in any significant impacts that: 1) are peculiar to the project or project site; 2) were not identified as significant project- level, cumulative, or off-site effects in the General Plan EIR; ar 3) were previously identified significant effects, which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the General Plan EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR. As a result, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083. 3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183, the proposed Project is exempt from further environmental review under CEQA.
3. All applicable General Plan policy and implementation actions and uni ormly applied development policies, standards andlor regulations are, hereby imposed on the proposed project and must be adhered to by the Project applicant in accordance with the Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan. To the extent the City has not previously made findings regarding any/ all of those referenced General Plan Update policy and implementation aetions and unifarmly applied development policies, standards and/ or regulations, the Pianning Commission hereby finds that all of those General Plan Update policy and implementation actions and uniformly applied development policies, standards and/ or regulations, were adopted, in whole or in part, to substanCially mitigate the potential environmental effects to which they pertain ( i.e., aesthetics, agricultural and forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gases, climate change, and energy, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, population, and housing, mineral resources noise, public services and recreation, circulation, utilities and services systems, and wildfire).
Section 3. Specific Plan Findings. Pursuant to State of California Plannzng and Zoning Law, the Planning Commission finds and deTermines as follows:
1. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan adopted pursuant to Resolutian No. 04- 1779 shall be in full force and effect as to that portion of the Specific Plan that covers Phase
1. 2. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments for Phase 2 is consistent with the goals, policies, implementation measures, and general land uses specified in the 2022 General Plan L'pdate because it promotes job- generating land uses within the Phase 2 Amendment area and specifically implements Implementation Measure LU- S. f of the General Plan, which requires the City to update the Central Lathrop Specific Plan to be cansistent with the adopted General Plan Update.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 23- 12 Pa e 3 of 6
3. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments is consistent with the goals, policies, impleznentation measures specified in khe General Plan Update related to promoting the development of job- generating land uses to support existing and future businesses. The Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment ensures that the City' s economic base will be strengthened by promoting deve] opment which will create a variety of high quality long- term jobs and shorter term construction jobs and encouraaes future developers to finance public facilities for long-term infrastructure solutions and public services. Additionally, the 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as amended by the proposed Phase 2 Amendment is consistent with the General Plan lipdate goals related to achieving visual and functional quality of new development because it requires the provision of open space within the planning area and the provision of landscape buffers between the Phase 2 area and sensitive receptors.
4. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendment, is consistent with Che goals, policies, general land uses and implementation measures specified in the General Plan Update because it ensures that proposed land uses will receive an adequate level of public services, facilities and protection by implementing the goals and policies of the Public Facilities and Services and Public Safety Elements of the General Plan.
5. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendment, is consistent with the goals, policies, general land uses, and implementation measures specified in the General Plan Circulation Element because it ensures that streets and highways will be constructed in accordance with the Traffic iVlonitoring Program to serve the new development.
6. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed retated Amendments, is consistent with the goals, policies, general land uses, and implementation measures specified in the Environmental Justice Element because it ensures that measures are in place tQ pramote land use and development patterns that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance air quality, and reduce climate change impacts.
7. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments, is consistent wikh the goals, policies, general land uses and impiementation measures of the General Plan beca ise it will promote orderly development of the plan through flexible phasing which is tied to the provisions o[ suppocting infrastructure capacity in the construction of off-site infrastructure improvements. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Phase 2 Amendment, provides for the construction of roadways to provide improved access to the project and adjacent properties, and the extension of utilities such as water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the project.
Pianning Commission Resolution No. 23- 12 Pa e= f 6
8. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modifzed by the proposed related Phase 2 Amendment, is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation measures af the General Plan Public Safety Element because it ensures that al[ new buildings construction shaIl conform to the latest Califarnia Building Code and seismic standards, gives priarity to support police protection, and to fire suppression, and implements practices and rebulations which avoid hazardous land use relationships.
Section 4. Code Text Amendment Pindinas. Pursuant to State of California Planning and Zoning Law, the Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
1. The proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment is consistent with the City' s General Plan Update, as enumerated in the Consistency Findings in the Staff Report.
2. The proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment furthers the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City by implementing the Central Lathrop Specific Phase 2 Amendment. The amendments would ensure consistency with the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment, General Plan, and Lathrop Municipal Code and update the zoning standards that are relevant to the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment.
Section S. Upon adoption by the City Council, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment applies only to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Project and does not change Che adopted Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it applies to the balance of the CLSP area ( Phase 1}; and
Section 6. Upon adoptian by the City Council, the Community Development Director is hereby directed to retain said 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as rnodified by the proposed related Amendments, on permanent public display in the Community Development Department, Planning Division in the City of Lathrop.
Section 7. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and the evidence in the Staff Report, the Planning Commission hereby recommencis to the City Council that the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment be added to the 2004 Specific Plan as a stand- alone document far Phase 2. These documents shall be subskantially in the form on file with the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on substantial evidence in the administrative record of proceedings, its above findinbs, including the staff report and associated attachments, pursuant to its independent review and consideration, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City Council approve both the Central LaChrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment, as illustrated and incorporated by reference as Attachment 2 of the Planning Commission Staff Report and Municipal Code Text Amendment No. TA-23- 104 as illustrated and incorporated hy reference as Attachment 3 of the Planning Commission Staff Report.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 23- 12 Paae 5 of 6
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lathrop at a Special meeting on the 13` h
day of September, 2023 by the following vote:
AYES: Ishihara, Camarena, Jackson, Rhodes
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Ralmilay
i
Tos I hihara, Ch` r
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ick C iat, Secretary Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney
Plannin Commission Resotution No. 23- 12 Paoe 6 of 6
TTA f i E 1 i ,° -
e u,yy, Victoria Brunn,
Manteta Unified Schoo) District Chief Business and Information Officer vbrunn@musd. net(( 2091858- 0764
c OQ w
September 28, 2023
El aard of`In st es
tari• 1- rc s,,
VIA E- MAIL( NARGAS( C CLLATHROP. CA. USt)$ c U. S. MAIL Prr>rdtnf ath} f', p l, t fi: tl
4 iz Yr ar 7er+ t Mcl}/ Ot" atlC ilt}/ 'i0U 1C1
a= r City of Lathrop
1^ Attn: City Clerk
1' r"'""""' 390 Towne Gentre Dr.
ti,:,, i. <;,,,,,
ii7, } t,, w, Lathrop, CA 95330
5trphcti!. ehluer
tiu}2 rinir icleirt Re: Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text f"`" 1`'' Amendment: Limi#ed Industrial Zoning Districts and Lathrop Municipal Code. Location: The Central Lathro S ecific Plan Phase 2 Amendment tUl_ 11 Y iI11Cl1cI4111 p area is located generally north of Dos Reis Road, west of S. Manthey Road i and Interstate 5, east of the San Joaquin River, and south of the existing tiuperintrncl nt'. t:ahi iet City Limits.
iehrn.e[ rixitn
rr:, r r r, rr,:,: r rrr r,; r a1, Honorable Mayor and City Councii Members:
I(fite r
i,,,, r.. t The proposed amendments to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan have the potential to L i ;,, Ft+ Fr; f':, j= r
impact the District. The proposed zoning changes are immediately adjacent to Lathrop i;`' t" High Schaol. The proposal includes changes to the entire area north of Dos Reis to non- r:' f'`""`"'`"' }`""`"``"", f,'"'"
residential and industrial land use. Lathrop High School at its location will continue to be ut„ Il;, c, part of the community and it is imperative that the separation of uses guidelines and policies in the CLSP include careful consideration of circulation, site design, noise, and I>>rcutiv Cabir rt O( Of.
1) ir! lydc' ut a• ri rtcs The District has reviewed the amendments and is suppartive of the landscape buffer requirements that will be included along Dos Reis Road and the requirements of an 8- foot r ro,:;,, f,,,, x;,, rr. foot soNd wall with the addition of 8-faot paved sidewalks on the north and south sides of tl E: i, r,..;>>. the roadway in this area to provide separation and improved pedestrian safety. The n.. Si t:,, r11. f,. r;., r
proposed amendments detail limited industrial and therefiore does not anticipate uses that n; rt;„ r=,<,,,,,, r r<<>;,
require #ruck dependence. We request future projects be careful(y evaluated and conditioned to ensure there is limited truck traffic enerated. t-,,., E, r<i 9 lr i
r>>=,rt,, r
Please let us know if there is any additional information needed from MUSD to assist in r z rf,,, t,,, tr,, 4 the review process. Do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions at 209j 858- 0858 ordeveloperfees@musd. net. 177i{% f' t l i' If,' flr Iti,l E(<! 1' 1[' l. f' 1.).
I) t tilrf; rr t: tcJucr irrr rl , 5, 111C@C@ Ir
S lu al. tccn;+ rrt r!> ilir
Julir Fiull: ndrr
Oir'. li• r, th: i
e- f. r ar nrrt
v//'/ L/ l/ r i —
t.
1iva uia Pcters
f ir t' Nr.L C, r Grh` a lr:, c ICtOfla g( UI 1
1>, E,... 5,,„, Chief Business and Information O cer
rr r,,,,; rx, r nr, Manteca Unified school Distriet
t) u31a V' a, r visa
Ji3: 1; i;;l Srri irr,
Cc: Rick Cagivat, Directar Corrtmuniry Development, via email ( RCaaivat ci. lathron. ca. us l P.O. Box 32 Phone( 209) 825- 3200
Manteca, CA 95336 Fax( 209} 858- 7570
2271 West Louise Avenue, Manteca, CA 95337 www.mantecausd. net ATT CHI ENT " S "
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
x
H" F
r „ E<
i
n aq, atiro t`+ ,
v I
r r 4
p k " t
d c* Y,:' 7', ,
y: Yy/"
µ
6 g
b.. +.
z.
a P
QC
i. N
f A ($" #!
u
t,
va`'., Gi',/, 1 % N
Q
r i „ xr' +{ '
a..
M v., ,' r
CLSP- z AMENDMENT PLAN r
k
AREA 2
1 r ,,.
W
ti
Z
Q
a
DE IMA ROAD c
U
t
Z
DOS REIS ROAD I ` ,
rr+ r
pG
y
G x; ri z, ";, z
a '
ti.,
SPA( AN WAY, LATHROP ROAD
f^ x
Q Q ti , , ,
f
1 "
i Q j.
s.
r P o a
ti U
r w"
C
r
LEGEND
Existing Truck Route
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area
N O R T H
Figure 3. 3
N.T. S. EXISTING TRUCK ROUTE PLAN
mac Y somps Central Lathrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 Amendment
ENGMEERS PLNVNERS SURVEYORS
Lathrop C(4
s
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
z tr i, r,
q
f '. x $
tx ,.: ; '` w', . g p
3 ,` 7 E
T
3 1n y a
Jn
r '' a,' S , n "`,`"
z
3? a' ?` ,% n&'" u,,,,," k t r it
r ,
N„, p
F % . g _,
r ` Y'"' sn' %
i
z z
ti!` '
s*'
t' p``";,
a,;.' ,,
t r a
x' o
a.; •
a
Pzz: 3' £' *:
a' a # „+ + b r >r
b .
CLSP- 2AMEN[ 7MENTPLAN
AREA r
k
a r ra rww ws • wwi w sr
c
s
1 r
r
r =Q
l
DE LIMA ROAD t
ti
Q
1 s •
z .
DOS RE15 RC7AD
i
p
swi ii r rrrr
Na TRUCK ACGESS ON DOS REIS a w
ROAD OR GOLDfN VALLEY PKWI` a ,
c Y ;:.
T xg
m / i.
r W.:,- 5PAR7ANWAY EA' MR4PROA
Y
s' a '':
4 4,
J' 4 d' ,
p
9 t , L Z
0• Su
2 Q Q
o , ;
C7
LECrE. trLl
Propos ed Truck Route
w w w r r X.iSiltig TNC C OI1iC
PfOpOSCfi STAA ROIltB
CLSP- 2 Amendmeat Plan Area
N O FI T M
Figure 3. 11
N. S PR POSED TRUCK ROUTE PLAN
mA Y[ sQ Central Lathrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 Amendment BN: NFE' i 9NINFRS JMEYOR$
Lathrop, Ca
d r.,
H . ,