2023-11-13_item_5.2_continued_discussion_from_october_9_2023_for_clsp_phase_2_code_text_amendment_no._ta-23-104 — Lathrop City Council, November 13, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

ITEM 5. 2

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: CONTINUED DISCUSSION FROM OCTOBER 9, 2023

REGULAR MEETING REGARDING THE CENTRAL
LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND
CODE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. TA- 23- 104
RECOMMENDATION: Council to Consider the Following:

1. Testimony Presented During the Public Hearing
Held October 9, 2023;

2. Adopt a Resolution to Find the Project Exempt
from Further Environmental Review Pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and
California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15183; and

3. First Reading and Introduction of an Ordinance to
Approve the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP)
Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment
to Modify Chapter 17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning
Districts to Add Article 6, IL- CL, Limited Industrial
Zoning Districts and Modify Section 17. 62. 120 B
of the Lathrop Municipal Code.

SUMMARY:

The Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment is a staff- initiated update to the CLSP to be consistent with the recently adopted Lathrop General Plan Update in accordance with General Plan Implementation Action LU- 5. f.

The Planning Commission and staff recommend that City Council consider all information provided and submitted, take and consider all public testimony and, if determined to be appropriate, adopt a Resolution to find the project exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 and First Reading and Introduction of an Ordinance to approve the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment to Modify Chapter

17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts to add Article 6, IL- CL, Limited Industrial Zoning Districts and modify Section 17. 62. 120 B of the Lathrop Municipal Code.

SITE DESCRIPTION:

The Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment area is focused north of Dos Reis Road, west of Interstate 5, east of the San Joaquin River and south of the City Limit. The Vicinity Map below illustrates the location of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment area.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 2
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
CENTRAI. LATHROP SP CTFIC PI.AN PHASG 2 AMFNDMENT
r
M x
r° SP- z A Ei D`ME ° u
s,
j',) "
1 s'
y

4.,
2 F 4 ; 1• f 1{
M
v
S`
X
sa l
s
f " Y' s
t
t
9 3l x5 it" P,} 3^ " 7ll. ,: as
r . tv.,; d, t
s R
sriirl x ",
F
fi s
e s 4
t t i u ;.`
4 jry {
j
i - , g*. i
t
m r a"
g
x
u x . f ; .
1 gx
a
i ` j d
o- ,.
e `- t. r''
b '" ",.

SPARTAN r. , s, 7n -' s''
w » a " WAY w+ * fi'
z:
rs .„ i L P t
e
i
a
r x , ,"
y f ? ,,
a 4`" 1N . 3,;
d
a „• , lI , r
s
ry p ..
e 3` . ,' '"
5'
y
p
1' trk' 1,,
b»[ .
ti w s
a s
s ' i' Yl
e
s
s
b
f' ;
ri Q., s x:
t
t p
w M
i`; St/ 1 14. ,^
s ._,. 1 .

N. y
AiiEi,
i
s
rrt r
4 f
S . ht
LATHROP 1,
t , w
t
m r E",
A
z
w' , t k
A
a
i a
t <:
i '
yf' t
gd
a
P n, f ti
h' F f .
12CJ
iMk'` „ P. - ``
LE GF. ND
CLSP- 2 Amendment P an Area Figure 1. 2
N D 4 T H
f,`(y, IfT11 5
hT. s
Sphere of Influence VICINITY MAP
A Y a Central Lathrop Specifie Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrap, Ca
CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 3
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment project is comprised of approximately 724- acres and involves the following Accessor' s Parcel Numbers 192- 020- 61, - 62, - 63, - 64, - 06, - 07, - 08, - 09, - 65, - 66, - 38, - 22, - 48, - 52, - 19, - 18, - 68, - 69, - 16, - 36, - 70, - 14, - 11, - 02, and - 03.

BACKGROUND:

The Central Lathrop Specific Plan was approved by the City Council on November 9, 2004 ( Resolution No. 04- 1779). The project included certification of an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) ( SCH# 2003072132), for the CLSP, adoption of the Specific Plan document, General Plan Land Use Map amendments, Zoning Map, and text amendments to the Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC). The CLSP is separated into two ( 2) major phases of development. Phase 1 is generally located south of Dos Reis Road and includes Lathrop High School, development of a regional park adjacent to Lathrop High School), residential and commercial uses. Phase 2 is located north of Dos Reis Road and previously included development of residential and commercial uses, parks, and school sites ( K- 8). The City Council recently adopted the comprehensive Lathrop General Plan Update ( adopted on September 19, 2022) and the CLSP area north of Dos Reis Road was modified from residential and commercial land use designations to Limited Industrial.

A Rezone ( map) to the properties in the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment area is being processed by the City via the Zoning Consistency Update Project. The proposed Amendment to the CLSP for Phase 2 would further bring the Specific Plan into consistency with the Lathrop General Plan and would allow development of Limited Industrial uses pursuant to the LMC and the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment document.

PLANNING COMMISSION:

On September 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed CLSP Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment ( TA- 23- 104). After review and consideration of all information provided, and after taking and considering all public testimony, the Planning Commission voted unanimously ( 4- 0) to adopt Resolution No. 23- 12, recommending the City Council find the project exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 and approve the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment comprised of approximately 724- acres and a Municipal Code Text Amendment to Chapter 17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts of the Lathrop Municipal Code. The Planning Commission Resolution is attached to this Staff Report as Attachment 6.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 4
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 9, 2023
On October 9, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed CLSP Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment ( TA- 23- 104). The City Council received written correspondence from Manteca Unified School District ( MUSD) in support of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment. The MUSD letter is attached to this Staff Report as Attachment 7.

At the meeting, the City Council deliberated over the City' s Truck Route Map. After further discussion, City Council voted to continue the item to the November 13, 2023 meeting. City Council directed staff to include a separate item on November 13, 2023 modifying the City' s Truck Route Map to prohibit trucks on Golden Valley Parkway.

The amendment to the City' s Truck Route Map has been scheduled for City Council consideration prior to this item. As such, updated Figures have been prepared and are attached to this Staff Report as Attachment 8.

ANALYSIS:

As noted above, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) was originally approved in 2004. The proposed CLSP Phase 2 Amendment includes updates and modifications for Phase 2 of CLSP only. The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment does not change the entitlements for Phase 1 of the CLSP and is a stand- alone document intended to implement the design and development standards and concepts for Phase 2. The primary goals of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment are designed to achieve the following:

Establish a comprehensive land use plan that will guide development of the approximately 724- acre CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Area.

Update the City' s long- term vision for the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Area in accordance with the recently adopted Lathrop General Plan, by incorporating refinements designed to reflect evolving innovation in land use planning concepts.

Establish a regional industrial development area adjacent to the I- 5 freeway that makes use of the visibility and prime freeway access provided by the Roth Road and I- 5 Interchange.

Maximize passive recreational opportunities through the creation of a comprehensive linear park and open space system located adjacent to and providing access to the San Joaquin River.

Generate positive fiscal benefits for the City resulting from the regional industrial development.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 5
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
Increase employment and shopping opportunities for City residents.

Provide job generating land uses in close proximity to residential uses in order to minimize home- to- work vehicular trip lengths, automobile usage and related air quality impacts.

Provide an integrated, efficient, and safe circulation system for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and vehicles.

Provide roadway improvements and land use planning that will tie together with existing development.

Establish a logical phasing plan that assures that each phase of development will include all necessary public improvements required to meet City standards.

Add value to the existing and future City of Lathrop community and contribute to the establishment of a strong local economic base through job creation and the economic stimulus that comes from the multi- million- dollar investment required to develop the CLSP and the disposable income of the people who live and work in the plan area.

Implement the development program envisioned for the CLSP on property that the Lathrop General Plan designates for Limited Industrial uses.

To the extent feasible, incorporate future project designs that minimize environmental impacts.

Provide a logical and orderly extension of the City of Lathrop that is compatible with and complements existing and planned land uses within other portions of the City.

Satisfy the City policies, regulations and expectations as defined in the Lathrop General Plan and Municipal Code.

Provide services and infrastructure that meet or exceed City standards and that do not diminish services to existing residents of the City.

Enrich the relationship between the City and the San ) oaquin River by incorporating the river' s edge as a critical component of the CLSP Parks and open space program.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 6
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment is organized as follows: Introduction, Land Use, Circulation and Transportation, Natural Resources Management, Community Services and Facilities, Utilities and Drainage Infrastructure, Design Guidelines, Implementation, and Financing.

Land Use Summary and Designations
The below table represents the proposed development acreages by land use.

Maximum Potential
Building Building
Designation Land Use
Area Square Square
acres) Footage at Footage at
Max FAR of Target FAR

1. 0 SF of 0. 75 SF
LI- CL Limited Industrial [ 1] 618. 2 26, 928, 792 20, 196, 594 OS- CL Open Space 29. 3
P- CL Park 11. 2
Major Road Right- of65. 3
Wa
Total 724. 0 26, 928, 792 20, 196, 594
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment contemplates Limited Industrial development at an average rather than a maximum Floor Area Ratio ( FAR) and recognizes that the likely development FAR will be 0. 75 or lower depending on off-street parking demand, landscaping, roadways, open space, stormwater management, and other site requirements. The following exhibit illustrates the proposed Land Use Map for the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 7
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
CENTRAL LATHROP SPEC( F1C. PLAN PHASE? AMENDMENT
z
y
t'
ss w s `
ad r."{' r pk' t, t t i:.,, 3t .
a xS ;' p5«' .
4 P'`
b
p= i
v,`.
t.. a`' i s; a* ,, ' ki aaa` r .
r ft , a
t;,
s '`, j,' x" " S,`
i .. ` t i
t aa -! , i"
t' " 3w `"< ° k ".',
1 q.
c, S t Ay. ' V' . , r , t,`
t.<,„ n s_ hrr
4' F
t
J :

L i'x'
1 fi
5 I
z " a "„"
ra .
t k. f f K n
sv d Y
E t
r
x{.: y
i
i ''
IYIIlCi, Y ti
a' 4 S
a` , zr
a
i. i. R .
t; m
g.
j
i r
v¢4
i{ F./
R
7`g
k
4" ' 3VT l+ t 4 lr+
a''
T- F rt" R' LS+` a.... wnm5..
l C
7'
d #
r Y
1 3»
h.
h
a
yeY.
ff. Z
y.
y
1 T'+L*
i
t"° y- axy, s
t" . Z
y
1 '.
k
e _
z:

SS r
t
w
i.x,. a> ... c`, w.. a, zz k ' a '
f
ntt: 1.. wa,° i.,
r. ,. , ,. - ..
u
s- '
x
c u
r
x
9, r r
r
d
t §
b dt " ds ` t d " p, `..
x r
x{ ` m
ry(. v' u
4 v3i + rc M.. .: " i
N
i
R
KA+
e
e
r e.
ai.' ` 8'b a ,
y, x . a as
aa 4 N il 4
e:' "
j , y( T E k
Y
n. '
M ' c , .
1!', k' s e :
ewr r,
t'
t u t,,+++ar i.,
P T. v. + d as , rz„*.

Ir
q - `

5. a ' "" a.,- .
q.
3 y
3 q d h
y.

A E} w,. Mp,'
f
i
t ,
n4" .

R
1 i iMlllt.E#I# IIIf111, 1 i, i4
r 4 a,*. i w 1 3 .., . t '.

I
a ' { 7
r,
t +
s i
a" t
iey ., '; ' ti y, 1
p
z a>., w w; ,° '
p . « x.
q '
r#
Yr
a t
r
s
a ;,
P "+
t. . m^ e"" x , °„ a ;, ,
a s x;w r A 1
s
1 4 " +,
y: ;„
s 3
r
t
a
3 " '' Y ` " . y., tr: `, ,
Y .
m , „ n ; z a kwi
o'
l li!
a
t '"" -; b :
s. ec, u
RI 7`.. „, ... =. Q E a EtVUE
Lirniicd lndusMal( Lt CI.) xntong Prt tty Lincs
Perk( P C' Ll Ruad R ht( n=N'ay Lines
Qpen Space f45-CL 1 P< resival Road Rigix t1f-IVny Line. if" M1cc ad F<x Ac. s,

N O F T M
C LSP- 2Aruru Cnent(' Cas, ru k u:ulary t{r 2. 1
N. T, S. r' l.tiP- I PIan; Iru: aRuaiodary LAND USE MAP Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 8
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
The following are the proposed land uses within the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Project.

Limited Industrial
The Limited Industrial use applies to most of the plan area. It is anticipated that uses such as warehousing and manufacturing that do not require a high degree of visibility and truck dependence, will be located in areas of the plan area that minimize the potential for air quality and noise impacts to sensitive receptors. The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Plan Area is envisioned to accommodate a wide range of job generating uses, including business parks, clean light industrial, research and development R& D); science, technology, engineering, and math ( STEM); tech/ biotech manufacturing; high- tech services that incorporate some combination of assembly; warehousing, and/ or sales; hospitals, labs and other health care- related uses, and distribution centers.

O en Space
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment designates Open Space uses along the San Joaquin River and this designation spans the length of the western edge of the plan area.

The area is designated to provide an open space corridor consistent with the Lathrop General Plan. The open space corridor is intended as a local community wide facility with the possibility of regional linkage via multi- use trail. For example, the open space corridor will connect to developing and existing segments to the south within the CLSP Phase 1 area and the Mossdale Village developments.

Park
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment retains the Dos Reis County Park designation, a County park within the City limits adjacent to the San Joaquin River.

Landscape Buffer along Dos Reis Road
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment includes provisions for a landscape buffer along the north side of Dos Reis Road with two ( 2) different design themes. At locations where existing or proposed land uses on the south side of Dos Reis Road include sensitive receptors, the landscape buffer includes a 30- foot- wide landscape corridor within the public right- of-way including 22' of landscaping and an 8' paved sidewalk as well as an additional buffer on the adjacent private development parcels. At locations on Dos Reis Road where Commercial use is proposed to the south, the landscape buffer shall include a 26- foot- wide landscape corridor within the public right- of-way including 18 feet of landscaping and an 8 foot paved sidewalk as well as an additional buffer on the adjacent private development parcels. An 8' high solid wall is also required within the landscape buffer area. Additional buffers on the adjacent private development parcels in both scenarios shall be determined during the Site Plan Review process for each specific development process. The following exhibit illustrates the location of the suggested landscape buffers.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 9
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
CF'' t' fRAI.[. r1TNROP SPECT' IG PI, AI PHASF? AhiF. DI tF,'tiT 3 F
S
3 r" F
i. s,..... ti
3Y' , F`` .
w,'.
dea, r+. a N: I ,.. o- ,,. .
y+e, n '-#
t i
s
r, r
N
Y
i{, t ,, d' 4
E
u.
y tl.

J
J
t ,
x
q
S
w r z' <
i. N
t:

E
x^
r,
r a? .
r
i' a: ,
f
R ..;
CQ v
y a
e' , rr r N ` A
G,,:. M S . r..
u.
d. t. . e .,_ , . a:..,. t r a ., , t
Lk:l L!. J
6'- 3€11. ands»: x Etu' Yrr u': tdr 1" ub. a Ri. d; t- t) f-Ncy A kli a ne` k nt''.ir lOiil, c Pii.,: a P- u; nxa
V+ S4k'£ BU*' EiP
A / i:' Ht FJ3[.1G N: 41 0* P t
a 6 . I
2 iritkrAt . F[ ER hStN:' Y ak14# TC . " d'" Z,. r.^'v r• t{,.,'..,..

P ffl" Y TO 3r Gf' Et tIhFO d: A
n4`„ +
iI VELO-*#. dt' F' E<: AT IC HS. n • : r '' n, °
c^' C. ! C ' ° Cv G
p ,
o' r ' C: i'?
y , S,
a atrs a . am sucE cara
PE? lFt H 4'iT;; u aA: PA' t RFC• iP` t
Y i tlYr6'. t/ 1iG' 2
a
H x` SOUTH
x: r y rt s rat:

ST 11}' ORfl CRt:1S5f\ t; iU
C,( L E:' RLLt1' P: 1Etklt:\ Y
aru z, w+ r„ rr a
mM. ..._.- r _ ti. ithta,. tc wtc+>+. w r
xit svxu. everc irHtn wvxtin e .,...
1 _ . r' 2.,, r ;r' 2 Yr - a% ?
PR ER, r TG 8E OETERit3hf0 62FH ti 1 • < ,
6EFt€ Pkl sT APM. IGA T! X tS c'XtkP. E
4 ti 1 ¢ 4' ",'
r S' r
8U`?' @F 3•1) IM : K:i.UD. STOfli l4' EA F oy' c'1 {,, ° ' C= i g
n` e C o 4,
Q=Jrv. lTa T^"` MERI_.A?:A i' J'
cfa.

F S
x
m..__.,_..................._...... ._........_.,____.._......._....._._._.....».___.___.._. 1"})
w/;
r_'____....._.._._._
Yj
JWTfI
Mi R H
pSC' APEE3 FFeRSECTtO\
1° ».
s r! vAi. i. v t n K. Fi urE 2. 2
N O R T a TC?' ICRVT' iIE' Y' RO. 1D

LANDSCAP BUFFER
A' Central Lathrap Spccitic I' lan- Phasc 2 Amendmcnt
k""`"
Lathrap, Ca fty.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 10
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
Code Text Amendment
The proposed Code Text Amendment includes language and provisions specific to the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Project and would modify Chapter 17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts of the Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC) to establish an IL- CL", Limited Industrial Zoning District with development standards. Specifically, the Code Text Amendment would add Article 6, IL- CL: Limited Industrial Zoning Districts to Chapter

17. 62. The IL- CL district is intended to provide industrial employment opportunities for residents of the city and region. The IL designation accommodates a wide range of job- generating uses, including business parks; clean light industrial; research and development ( R& D); science, technology, engineering, and math ( STEM); tech/ biotech manufacturing, and/ or sales, hospitals and other health care- related uses, warehouses and distribution centers.

General Plan Consistencv
The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment would implement General Plan Implementation Measure LU- 5. f which requires the City to update the CLSP. Specifically, General Plan Implementation Measure LU- 5. f states the following:

Update the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) to accomplish the following objectives:
a. Bring the Specific Plan' s land use map into consistency with the General Plan Land Use Map ( Figure LU- 1)
b. Establish a circulation network that keeps future truck trips as far from existing and planned sensitive receptors as feasible; this includes, but not limited to, the following requirements, which shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan:
i. Trucks shall be prohibited on Dos Reis Road west and east of Golden Valley Parkway, on Golden Valley Parkway south of Dos Reis Road to Lathrop Road, and on Lathrop Road east of Golden Valley Parkway to Interstate 5 southbound off- ramp.
ii. Future truck dependent development projects shall be prohibited from providing driveway access points off Dos Reis Road, west of Golden Valley Parkway, other than emergency vehicle access ( EVA). iii. Truck trafFic within the Limited Industrial Area of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan shall be limited to De Lima Road, and any future roadways north of Dos Reis Road, to connect to Manthey, Roth Road, and Interstate 5.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 11
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
c. Establish site design standards for new industrial projects. d. Identify financing and cost- recovery methods to fund roadway and infrastructure improvements.
e. Circulation design standards that promote safe transportation routes that limit impacts to developed areas to the south, and connectivity enhancements to provide better connectivity to I- 5.
f. Infrastructure improvements to improve roadway operations. g. Opportunities to provide employee- serving amenities onsite, such as parks and plazas, outdoor seating areas, fitness facilities, and daycare centers as a means to reduce vehicle trips, while supporting air quality, public health, and sustainability goals.
h. Include provisions that all development projects proposed north of Dos Reis Road and south of De Lima Road be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit CUP), which shall be subject to discretionary review by the City Council.

Based on Staff' s review, the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment is consistent with the requirements of Implementation Action LU- 5. f. Chapter Three of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment document describes the proposed circulation system and transportation included in the plan area, including a Truck Route Plan that prohibits trucks on Dos Reis Road west and east of Golden Valley Parkway, on Golden Valley Parkway south of Dos Reis Road to Lathrop Road, and on Lathrop Road east of Golden Valley Parkway to Interstate 5 southbound off- ramp. Chapter Three also describes the Circulation Design standards and connectivity enhancements. Chapter Seven of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment document describes the Design Guidelines and Principles for new industrial projects as well as opportunities for employee- serving amenities.

In addition to fulfilling Implementation Measure LU. 5f above, the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Implementation Measures listed in Table 1. 3 in the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment document ( starting on Page 1- 8). The CLSP Phase 2 Amendment document is attached to this Staff Report as Attachment

3. Zoning ConsistencX
The proposed Code Text Amendment would add language and provisions specific to the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Project and would modify Chapter 17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts to establish an IL- CL, Limited Industrial Zoning District including development standards.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 12
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
The proposed CLSP Phase 2 Amendment document and amendments to the Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC) will provide the necessary regulations and provisions to implement the Specific Plan and review proposed projects within the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment area.

Findinas
Chapter Eight, Implementation, of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) provides guidance on interpretation and amendment of the Specific Plan. Specifically, the CLSP states the following:

Amendments to the Specific Plan, including the Design Guidelines, may be proposed by a developer or property owner or initiated by the City, and shall be processed in accordance with City ordinances and subject to the requirements and limitations of any applicable development agreement. All amendments shall be presented in a public hearing before City Council action on that proposal. Generally, the process for amending the Specific Plan is similar to that for amending the City's General Plan, with the difference that there is no limitation on the number of Specific Plan amendments that may be approved in any one year.

In this regard, the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment is a Staff- initiated amendment to the CLSP that would implement the Lathrop General Plan. As noted above, Implementation Measure LU- 5. f requires the City to amend the CLSP to be consistent with the General Plan. The amendment is being processed similar to that of a General Plan Amendment in that the proposed CLSP Phase 2 Amendment will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council via Public Hearings.

Public Notice
A Notice of Public Hearing was advertised in the Manteca Bulletin on September 29, 2023. Staff also mailed the public hearing notice to notify property owners located within a 300- foot radius from the project site boundary. In addition, the Public Notice was emailed to the City' s Public Hearing subscribers and interested parties and posted at three ( 3) locations accessible to the public and the City website.

CEQA REVIEW:

California Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project- specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 13
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183( b), " a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis:

1. Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located;

2. Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan or community plan with which the project is consistent;

3. Are potentially significant off- site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action; or

4. Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the prior EIR.

A detailed Environmental Checklist, dated August 2023, prepared by De Novo Planning Group was prepared to analyze the proposed Central Lathrop Specific Plan CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment and associated Code Text Amendment.

Additionally, the Environmental Checklist analyzed two ( 2) other distinct, yet closely related actions being contemplated by the City: the City' s Zoning Consistency Project which includes amendments to the Lathrop Municipal Code ( LMC) and the City' s Zoning Map and the Ashley Furniture Project ( Site Plan Review No. SPR- 23- 09 and Conditional Use Permit No. CUP- 23- 08). As a result of the newly adopted General Plan, the City is initiating an update to the Municipal Code to bring the code and Zoning Map into consistency with the General Plan, and updating the Phase 2 portion of the CLSP into consistency with the General Plan. The City also received development applications for the Ashley Furniture Project within the boundaries of the CLSP Phase 2 area.

As explained in the Environmental Checklist in detail, the proposed projects are consistent with the City' s General Plan, for which an EIR was prepared and certified, and there are no site- specific or cumulative impacts associated with the proposed projects that have not been fully addressed in a previous environmental document, or that cannot be reduced to a less than significant level through the application of uniformly applied development policies and/ or standards. The findings in the Environmental Checklist demonstrate that no additional environmental analysis/ review is required CEQA prior to approval of the proposed projects.

The Environmental Checklist is attached to this Staff Report as Attachment 5.

CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 14
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION:

17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts to add Article 6, IL- CL, Limited Industrial Zoning Districts and modify Section 17. 62. 120 B of the Lathrop Municipal Code.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All application processing fees and costs are charged to the applicant. The request has no fiscal impact to the City.

ATTACHMENT:

1. City Council Resolution to Find the Project Exempt from Further Environmental Review Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183

2. Ordinance to Approve the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment

3. CLSP Phase 2 Amendment Document

4. Mark- up of Chapter 17. 62 Central Lathrop Zoning Districts

5. Environmental Checklist, prepared by De Novo Planning Group, dated August, 2023 with Appendices

6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 23- 12

7. Comment Letter, dated September 28, 2023, from Manteca Unified School District

8. Revised Figure 3. 3, Existing Truck Route Plan and Figure 3. 11, Proposed Truck Route Plan of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment
CITY MANAGERS REPORT PAGE 15
NOVEMBER 13, 2023 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CLSP PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
APPROVALS:
l6 l 2 L3
Da d Niskanen Date
Contract Planner
f 2 SZJo n B. Anderson Date
Contract Planner
z3
Ri Cagui Da e
mmuni Development Director
U• /' L02
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
t-!• 2
Step J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 23-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP FINDING

PROJECT EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21083. 3 AND CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ( CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15183 ( TA23- 104) WHEREAS, Section 65450 et, seq, of the California Government Code provides for the preparation and adoption of Specific Plans by general law cities for implementation of all or part of an adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65453 of the California Government Code provides that a Specific Plan may be adopted or amended by either Resolution or Ordinance as provided by the local jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment is being updated to be consistent with the 2022 General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the proposed Code Text Amendment amends Chapter 17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts to be consistent and implement the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment and 2022 General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment ( TA- 23- 104) applies only to Phase 2 ( the Project) and does not in any way apply to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 1 Project; and WHEREAS, the Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it affects Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment is a stand- alone document for the Phase 2 portion of Central Lathrop; and
WHEREAS, prior to the City' s approval of the 2022 General Plan Update, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) which analyzed the environmental impacts of buildout under the General Plan Update pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) ( Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq.), and the Lathrop City Council certified the General Plan Update Final EIR on September 19, 2022 ( State Clearinghouse # 2021100139); and WHEREAS, the analysis in the General Plan Update EIR allows the use of CEQA exemption/ streamlining provisions for projects developed under the General Plan Update, including the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as it affects the Phase 2 Project, is an amendment to the adopted 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, which was adopted by Resolution No. 04- 1779 on November 9, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to retain the 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan as the governing land use regulations for certain specified portions of the Specific Plan area including properties within the Phase 1 Specific Plan area; and Resolution No. 23-
WHEREAS, the City of Lathrop Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on September 13, 2023, to consider the proposed Project and after reviewing and considering all information provided and submitted, and after taking and considering all public testimony adopted Resolution No. 23- 12 recommending City Council find the Project exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of this public hearing was given in all respects as required by law including the publishing of a legal notice of the hearing in the Manteca Bulletin on or about September 29, 2023 and mailed out to property owners located within a 300- foot radius from the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment project area on September 29, 2023, emailed to the City' s Public Hearing subscribers and interested parties and posted at three ( 3) locations accessible to the public and the City website; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has utilized its own independent judgement in adopting this Resolution.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby make the following findings:

Section 1. California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Findings. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083. 3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183, the City Council finds and determines as follows:
a. The project complies with CEQA based on the CEQA
exemption/ streamlining provisions contained in Public Resources Code section 21083. 3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183;
b. Pursuant to the City Council Staff Report and the attachments and exhibits thereto, including but not limited to, the CEQA Environmental Checklist, which are incorporated herein by reference, the proposed Project will not result in any significant impacts that: 1) are peculiar to the project or project site; 2) were not identified as significant projectlevel, cumulative, or off- site effects in the General Plan Update EIR; or 3) were previously identified significant effects, which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the General Plan Update EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the General Plan Update EIR.

As a result, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083. 3 and CEQA Guidelines section 15183, the proposed Project is exempt from further environmental review under CEQA.
c. All applicable General Plan Update policy and implementation actions and uniformly applied development policies, standards and/ or regulations are, hereby imposed on the proposed Project and must be adhered to by the Project applicant.

Resolution No. 23-
To the extent the City has not previously made findings regarding any/ all of these referenced General Plan policy and implementation actions and uniformly applied development policies, standards and/ or regulations, the City Council finds that all of those General Plan Update policy and implementation actions and uniformly applied development policies, standards and/ or regulations, were adopted, in whole or in part, to substantially mitigate the potential environmental effects to which they pertain ( i. e., aesthetics, agricultural and forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gases, climate change, and energy, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, population, and housing, mineral resources, noise, public services and recreation, circulation, utilities and service systems, and wildfire).

Section 2. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby find the Project Exempt from Further Environmental Review Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 as illustrated and incorporate by reference as Attachment 5 of the City Council Staff Report.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lathrop, based on substantial evidence in the administrative record of proceedings, its above findings, including the staff report and associated attachments, does hereby find the Project exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.

Resolution No. 23-
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of November 2023 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

SIGNED:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney Resolution No. 23-
ORDINANCE NO. 23-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP APPROVING THE CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN ( CLSP) PHASE 2 AMENDMENT AND CODE TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODIFY CHAPTER 17. 62, CENTRAL LATHROP ZONING DISTRICTS TO ADD ARTICLE 6, IL- CL: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS AND MODIFY SECTION 17. 62. 120 B OF THE LATHROP MUNICIPAL CODE ( TA- 23- 104)
WHEREAS, Section 65450 et, seq, of the California Government Code provides for the preparation and adoption of Specific Plans by general law cities for implementation of all or part of an adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65453 of the California Government Code provides that a Specific Plan may be adopted or amended by either Resolution or Ordinance as provided by the local jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment is being updated to be consistent with the 2022 General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the proposed Code Text Amendment amends Chapter 17. 62, Central Lathrop Zoning Districts to be consistent and implement the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment and 2022 General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment and Code Text Amendment ( TA- 23- 104) applies only to Phase 2 ( the Project) and does not in any way apply to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 1 Project; and WHEREAS, the Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it affects Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment is a stand- alone document for the Phase 2 portion of Central Lathrop; and
WHEREAS, prior to the City' s approval of the 2022 General Plan Update, the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) which analyzed the environmental impacts of buildout under the General Plan Update pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) ( Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq.), and the Lathrop City Council certified the General Plan Update Final EIR on September 19, 2022 ( State Clearinghouse # 2021100139); and WHEREAS, the analysis in the General Plan Update EIR allows the use of CEQA exemption/ streamlining provisions for projects developed under the General Plan Update, including the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, prior to approval of the Project, the City Council adopted a Resolution to find the Project exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083. 3 and California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183; and
Ordinance No. 23-
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as it affects the Phase 2 Project, is an amendment to the adopted 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, which was adopted by Resolution No. 04- 1779 on November 9, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to retain the 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan as the governing land use regulations for certain specified portions of the Specific Plan area including properties within the Phase 1 Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, the City of Lathrop Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on September 13, 2023, to consider the proposed Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan and Code Text Amendment and after reviewing and considering all information provided and submitted, and after taking and considering all public testimony adopted Resolution No. 23- 12 recommending City Council approval of the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of this public hearing was given in all respects as required by law including the publishing of a legal notice of the hearing in the Manteca Bulletin on or about September 29, 2023 and mailed out to property owners located within a 300- foot radius from the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment project area on September 29, 2023, emailed to the City' s Public Hearing subscribers and interested parties and posted at three ( 3) locations accessible to the public and the City website; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all written evidence and oral testimony presented to date.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lathrop based on substantial evidence in the administrative record of proceedings and pursuant to its own independent review and consideration, hereby approves the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) Phase 2 Amendment, as shown in Attachment 3 of the City Council Staff Report with revised Figures 3. 3 and 3. 11 as shown in Attachment 8, relative to the proposed development of the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment project area on certain real property consisting of 724 acres located in the City of Lathrop, incorporated by reference herein.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. This Ordinance incorporates, and by this references makes part hereof, that certain Amendment to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it affects Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment Project, as shown in Attachment 3 of the City Council Staff Report, relative to the proposed development of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment area on certain real property consisting of approximately 724- acres located in the City of Lathrop.

Ordinance No. 23-
Section 2. Specific Plan Findinqs. Pursuant to State of California Planning and Zoning Law, the City Council finds and determines as follows:

1. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 04- 1779 shall be in full force and effect as to that portion of the Specific Plan that covers Phase 1.

2. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments for Phase 2 is consistent with the goals, policies, implementation measures, and general land uses specified in the 2022 General Plan Update because it promotes job- generating land uses within the Phase 2 Amendment area and specifically implements Implementation Measure LU- 5. f of the General Plan, which requires the City to update the Central Lathrop Specific Plan to be consistent with the adopted General Plan Update.

3. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments is consistent with the goals, policies, implementation measures specified in the General Plan Update related to promoting the development of job- generating land uses to support existing and future businesses. The Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment ensures that the City' s economic base will be strengthened by promoting development which will create a variety of high quality long- term jobs and shorter term construction jobs and encourages future developers to finance public facilities for long- term infrastructure solutions and public services. Additionally, the 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as amended by the proposed Phase 2 Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Update goals related to achieving visual and functional quality of new development because it requires the provision of open space within the planning area and the provision of landscape buffers between the Phase 2 area and sensitive receptors.

4. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendment, is consistent with the goals, policies, general land uses and implementation measures specified in the General Plan Update because it ensures that proposed land uses will receive an adequate level of public services, facilities and protection by implementing the goals and policies of the Public Facilities and Services and Public Safety Elements of the General Plan.

5. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendment, is consistent with the goals, policies, general land uses, and implementation measures specified in the General Plan Circulation Element because it ensures that streets and highways will be constructed in accordance with the Traffic Monitoring Program to serve the new development.

Ordinance No. 23-

6. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments, is consistent with the goals, policies, general land uses, and implementation measures specified in the Environmental Justice Element because it ensures that measures are in place to promote land use and development patterns that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance air quality, and reduce climate change impacts.

7. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments, is consistent with the goals, policies, general land uses and implementation measures of the General Plan because it will promote orderly development of the plan through flexible phasing which is tied to the provisions of supporting infrastructure capacity in the construction of off- site infrastructure improvements. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Phase 2 Amendment, provides for the construction of roadways to provide improved access to the project and adjacent properties, and the extension of utilities such as water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the project.

8. The 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Phase 2 Amendment, is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation measures of the General Plan Public Safety Element because it ensures that all new buildings construction shall conform to the latest California Building Code and seismic standards, gives priority to support police protection, and to fire suppression, and implements practices and regulations which avoid hazardous land use relationships.

Section 3. Code Text Amendment Findings. Pursuant to State of California Planning and Zoning Law, the City Council finds and determines as follows:

1. The proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment is consistent with the City' s General Plan Update, as enumerated in the Consistency Findings in the Staff Report.

2. The proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment furthers the public interest, convenience, and general welfare of the City by implementing the Central Lathrop Specific Phase 2 Amendment. The amendments would ensure consistency with the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment, General Plan, and Lathrop Municipal Code and update the zoning standards that are relevant to the CLSP Phase 2 Amendment.

Section 4. Upon adoption by the City Council, the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment applies only to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Project and does not change the adopted Central Lathrop Specific Plan as it applies to the balance of the CLSP area ( Phase 1).

Ordinance No. 23-
Section 5. Upon adoption by the City Council, the Community Development Director is hereby directed to retain said 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan, as modified by the proposed related Amendments, on permanent public display in the Community Development Department, Planning Division in the City of Lathrop.

Section 6. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance, the CEQA Resolution, and evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment and directs that the Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Amendment be added to the 2004 Central Lathrop Specific Plan as a stand- alone document for Phase 2. These documents shall be substantially in the form on file with the City Clerk.

Section 7. This Ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in the manner that imposes upon the city or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care toward persons and property within or without the city so as to provide a basis for civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.

Section 8. Severabilitv. If any section, subsequent subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such a decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the unconstitutionality or invalidity of any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase.

Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take legal effect 30 days from and after the date of its passage.

Section 10. Publication. Within fifteen days of the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Ordinance to be published in full accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code.

Ordinance No. 23-
THIS ORDINANCE was regularly introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Lathrop on the 13th day of November 2023, and was PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lathrop on 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney Ordinance No. 23-
ATTA.0 H M E NT " "
Central Lathrop Specific Plan
Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, California
May 2023
Central Lathrop Specific Ylan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Table of Contents
ChapterOne: Introduction................................................................... 1- 5 Overview and: lpplicability of the CLSP Phase 2 mendment....................................................................... 1- 5 Purpose....................................................................................................................................................................... 1- 6 I' lanning' ision.......................................................................................................................................................... 1- 6 Goalsof the Specific Plan..................................................................................................................................... 1- 16 Context..................................................................................................................................................................... 1- 17 Legal. uthoritv....................................................................................................................................................... 1- 20 Relationship to Other City Policies, Programs, and Documents..................................................................1- 20 Organizationof the Specific Plan........................................................................................................................1- 21 ChapterTwo: Land Use........................................................................ 2- 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 2- 1 F3sistingand Interim Land Uses............................................................................................................................. 2- 1 I_.and Use Plan........................................................................................................................................................... 3- 1 LandscapeBuffer....................................................................................................................................................... 2-? LandUse Designations............................................................................................................................................. 2- 5 Calculation of Land Use Intensiries and 1lllowable Square Footages.............................................................?- 6 LandUse and Site Lavout Flexibility..................................................................................................................... 2- 6 Land Use Regulations and Development Standards..........................................................................................?- 7 Chapter Three: Circulation and Transportation.................................. 3- 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................3- 1 Circularion and Transportation Goals...................................................................................................................3- 1 E: isting Conditions.................................................................................................................................................. 3- 1 Proposed Transportation Improvements............................................................................................................ 3- 7 CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan. rea Transportation I ietwork................................................................................. 3-? CLSP-?: lmendment Plan rea Truck Routes...................................................................................................3- 8 UtilitvCorridors...................................................................................................................................................... 3- 15 Bic`-cle and Pedestrian Network.......................................................................................................................... 3- 15 Chapter Four: Natural Resources Management.................................. 4- 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 4- 1 OpenSpace and Parks.............................................................................................................................................. 4- 1 illiamson Act Lands.............................................................................................................................................. 4- 1 Rightto Farm..............................................................................................................................................................4- 1 BiologicalResources.................................................................................................................................................. 4- F abitat Conservation Plan...................................................................................................................................... 4- 3 Historicand Cultural Resources.............................................................................................................................. 4- 3 Chapter Five: Community Services and Facilities...............................5- 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 5- 1 Parksand Recreation................................................................................................................................................ 5- 1 CLSP- 2 Open Space................................................................................................................................................. 5- 1 CLSP- 2 Open Space Interface...............................................................................................................................5- 1 Police and lnimal Control Senices........................................................................................................................ 5- 2 Fire and Emergency Services................................................................................................................................... 5- 2 Solid' aste.................................................................................................................................................................. 5- 3 Pagc 1- 2
Central]. athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chapter One: Introduction Chapter Six: Utilities and Drainage Infrastructure..............................6- 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................G- 1 Potable` Uater............................................................................................................................................................. G- 1 as tewater.................................................................................................................................................................. 6- 5 RecycledWater.......................................................................................................................................................... G- 9 Flood Protection and Storm' ater Quality...................................................................................................... G- 11 Public Utiliry Easements and Utilit' Corridors................................................................................................. 6- 19 Energy and Telecommunicauons........................................................................................................................ 6- 19 Chapter Seven: Design Guidelines.......................................................7- 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................7- 1 Purpose....................................................................................................................................................................... 7- 1 LandUse..................................................................................................................................................................... 7- 1 CLSP- 2 rlmendment Principles, Standards and Guidelines..............................................................................?-? SiteDesign.................................................................................................................................................................. 7- 2 rchite c ture............................................................................................................................................................. 7- 1? Chapter Eight: Implementation........................................................... 8- 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................8- 1 SpecificPlan Implementation.................................................................................................................................. 8- 1 Rightto Farm Provisions......................................................................................................................................... 8- 1 Development lgreements....................................................................................................................................... 8-? CityReview Process.................................................................................................................................................. 8-? t-Iabitat Conservation Plan....................................................................................................................................... 8- 3 lmendments to CLtiP-2.......................................................................................................................................... 8- 4 Overview of Development. pproval Process..................................................................................................... 8- 5 Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permits,' ariances, and other permits for individual development projects........................................................................................................................................................................ 8- 5 Phasing........................................................................................................................................................................8- 6 TheCLSP Phasing Program.................................................................................................................................... 8- 6 Infrastructure: ldministration..................................................................................................................................8- G Capital Improvement and Operation/ Iaintenance Responsibilities.............................................................8- 9 Interpretarion and. mendment of Specific Plan..................................................................................................8- 9 tipecific Plan Consistency and Enforcement..................................................................................................... 8- 11 Chapter Nine: Financing......................................................................9- 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................................9- 1 FinancingPlan............................................................................................................................................................)- 1 Updatesof I'inancing Plan....................................................................................................................................... 9- Financing/ Fiscal leasures...................................................................................................................................... 9- 2 Reimbursement lgreements................................................................................................................................... 9- 5

Page 1 ends

entral Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendmenf Chaptcr One: Introduction List of Tables
Table 1. 1: Relationship berween the 2004 CLSP and CLSP- 3 Amendment.............................................................. 1- 6 Table 1. 2: Goals from the 2022 I.athrop General Plan.................................................................................................1- 8 Table 2. 1: CLSP- 2 mendment Land Use Summary....................................................................................................3- 5 Table G. 1: Estimated' ater Demand................................................................................................................................ G- 2 Table 6. 2: F_,stimated Sewer Demand................................................................................................................................ 6- G Table 6. 3: atershed Detention Facilities and Pump titation Sizes......................................................................... 6- 13 I'able 8. 1: Capital Improvement and Operation/: laintenance Responsibilities.......................................................8- 9 List of Figures
Figure1. 1- Regional 11ap................................................................................................................................................. 1- 14 Figure1. 2-' icinity fap................................................................................................................................................... 1- 15 Figure1. 3- Esisting Ownership Iap............................................................................................................................. 1- 18 Figure1. 4- Existing Conditions Iap.............................................................................................................................1- 19 Fi ure 2. 1- Land Use Map.................................................................................................................................................?-3 Figure2. 2- I,andscape Buffer............................................................................................................................................. 2- 4 Figure3. 1- E sting Circulation Pian................................................................................................................................ 3- 4 F igure 3. 2- E sting Bus Service Plan.............................................................................................................................. 3- 5 F igure 3. 3- E isting Truck Route Plan............................................................................................................................3- 6 Figure 3. 4-' ehicular Circulauon Plan.............................................................................................................................. 3- 9 Figure3.5- Street Sections Key fap.............................................................................................................................. 3- 10 Figure3. 6- titreet Sections................................................................................................................................................ 3- 11 Figure3. 7- Street Sections................................................................................................................................................ 3- 13 Figure3. 8- Street Sections................................................................................................................................................ 3- 13 Figure3. 9- Street Sections................................................................................................................................................ 3- 14 Figure 3. 10- Pedestrian and Bic cle Circulation I' lan.................................................................................................. 3- 16 Figure 3. 11- Proposed Truck Route Plan......................................................................................................................3- 17 Figure 6. 1- Potable ti`Uater Pipe Net vork......................................................................................................................... 6- 4 Figure6. 2-' astewater Network....................................................................................................................................... 6- 7 Figure G. 3- Offsite' astewater Force i SAin Improvements......................................................................................... G- 8 Figure 6. 4- Recy-cled' ater Pipe Network.................................................................................................................... G- 10 Figure6. 5- Existing' atersheds..................................................................................................................................... 6- 16 Figure6. G- Proposed Y atersheds................................................................................................................................... G- 1? FigureG.?- Stormwater Network....................................................................................................................................6- 18 P'igure G. 8- Existing Power Lines.................................................................................................................... G-_ 0 Figure7. 1- Gatewaj Sign Locations...............................................................................................................................?- 17 Figure8. 1- Phasing 1ap...................................................................................................................................................... 8- 8 Ya; e i-- 4
Central], athrop Specific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Chapter One: Introduction
Ovetview and Applicability ofthe CLSP I'he Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 2 Phase 2Amet2dmetlt Amendment (" CLSP- 2 Amendment"} includes updates and modifications only for the Phase 2
The City of Lathrop adopted the Central Lathrop Plan Area portion ofthe Central Lathrop Specific Specific Plan( CLSP) on November 9, 2004. The Plan comprising the 724- acre area north of I os 2004 CLSP provided for the development of Reis Road. The CLSP- 2 Amendment does approYimately 1, 521 acres located south of the not, in any way, alter, amend, or otherwise northern city limit line, west of Interstate- 5, change the vested entitlements for the CLSP north of the Mossdale Village planning area, and Phase 1 area, which is the 797- acre area south east of the San ) oaquin River as illustrated in of Dos Reis Road. The original 2004 CLSP Figure 1. 1 and 1? ( CLSP Plan 3rca). and the associated entitlements continue to govern the resideniial mixed use
The CISP Plan Area consist of ttvo primar} development in the CLSP Phase 1 Plan Area. development phases. Phase 1 of the CLSP covers
approsimately 797 acres in_the southern portion The CLSP-? rlmendment revises all policies, Phase 1 Plan rea), and Phase 2 applies to the regulations, land use concepts, and development 724- acre northern portion ( Phase 2 Plan rea). standards with respect to Phase 2 and Dos Reis Road serves as the ciividing line supersedes the 2004 CLSP for the area north of bet veen the two phases. Dos Reis Road.

The City of Lathrop General Plan, in effect when Table 1. 1 identifies the chapters of the CLSP- 2 the 2004 CLSP vas adopted, provided for the 1- mendment and the corresponding chapters development of a residenual mixed use diey supersede in the origina12004 CLSP. community in both Phases 1 and 2. " I1ie City of
Lathrop recently adopted an update to the The City of Lathrop is the sponsor of the CLSPI,athrop General Plan on September 19, 2022. 2 mendment in order to amend the 2004 CLSP The 2022 Lathrop General Plan changed the for the Phase 2 Plan AYea so diat the CLSP- 2 prior Ueneral Plan Yesidential, parks, schools, mendment is consistent with the recently and commercial land use designations in the adopted 2022 Lathrop General Plan. The- 2004 CLSP Phase 2 Pian Area to Limited Industrial, CLSP designated residential, paYks, schools, and while maintaining the Open Space and Linear commeYcial uses within the CLSP Phase 2 Plan Park designation along the Mossdale Txact levee. r Yea. The CLSP- 2 Amendment changes the The 2022 General Plan Update did not change residential, parks, schools, and commercial land the adopted land use designations in Phase 1 uses vithin the Phase 2 Plan rlrea to Limited rlrea which allowed the development of Industrial and retains the Open Space xesidential neighborhoods, commercial areas, designation consistent with the 2022 Lathrop and public facilities including a high school, a General Plan. The CLSP- 2 amendment cill communiry center and parks. implement the 2022 General Plan policies and establish clear direction for the development of
Development has occurred in the Phase 1 area, the Plan I rea. This land use change is consistent but no development has occurred within the vith the City' s efforts to support the 1 fossdale Phase 2 area. Tract' s procision of 200-year urban level offlood protection.

Page 1 ends

Central l,athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptet One: Introducrion Table 1. 1: Kelation.rhij bet veen the 2004 G'I_SP and CISl'- 2 Amendment Chapter in 2004 CLSP ( Superseded for the Chapters in CLSP- 2 Amendment for Phase 2 Phase 2 area) area
Chapter One: Introduction Chapter One, Introduction
Chapter Two: Land Use Chapter Two, Land Use
Chapter Three: Circulation and' I'ransportation Chapter 7'hree, Circulation and Transportation Chapter Four: Management of Natural Resources Chapter F'our, Natural Resources 1 Zanagement Chapter Five: Community Services and Facilities Chapter Five, Community Services and Facilities Chapter Six: Utilities and Drainage Infrastructure Chapter SiY, Utilities and Drainage Infrastructure Chapter Seven: Community Desi,m Chapter Seven, Design Guidelines Chapter Eight: Implementation Chapter Eight: Implementation Chapter Nine: Financing Chapter Nine: Financing
Putpose to continue. Of the cities located in San Joaquin Counn-, Lathrop has become one of the fastest
I'he purpose oF the CLSP- 2 mendment is to
growing cities of its size, and financially stable
create a comprehensive planning framework that cities in the State of California. This status is due guides the development of the 724 acres within to its location, availabiliry of housing and jobs, the Phase 2 Plan Area in a manner consistent
and strategic planning that has provided a vast
with the 2022 Lathrop Gencral Plan. The CI_SPamount of land desi nated to create an ideal 21 mendment is consistent with and based upon
balance of housing, retail, services, leisure, and
the 2022 I
athrop Genexal Plan long-term vision
jobs creating industries fot decades of sustainable
for the Central Lathrop Specihc Plan area. growth.

The CLSP- 2 Amendment contains policies, The CLSP- 2 13mendment designates land uses action items and exhibits regarding Phase 2 land
for a variety of business opportunities to support
use, circulation and transportation, management the sl illed and educated vorkforce of Lathrop of natural resources, infrastructure, design and the local area. Crearing a relationship guidelines, implementation, and financing. bet veen jobs for the communit- and housing is paramount. Attracting businesses is essential in
Plannrng Vision reducing the need for residents to commute out The Stockton- Trary-Lathrop- 1 Tanteca region of the area, generaring revenue for the city, as has eYperienced record growth that is anticipated vell as decreasing carbon emissions by reducing Pagc 1- 6
Central I.athiop Specific Plan— Phase 2 i mendment Chapter One: Introduction vehicle miles travelled ( VM' I) of lengthy
commutes throughout the County and beyond.

The 2022 Lathrop General Plan supparts
environmentally sensitive and sustainable
employment growth by establishing land for
industrial development within the Plan Area. The
CLSP- 2 Amendment is consistent with the 2022
General Plan in fulFilling the goals listed in Table

1. 2 below. In addirion the CLSP- 2 Amendment
complies vith the LU- 5 Implementation Actions
outlined in the 2022 General Plan and listed in
Table 1. 3 belo v.

Page 1 ends

Central lathcop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendment Chapter One [ ntroduction Table 1. 2: Gor ls from the 2022 I zthrop General Plan
Land Uses
LU- 1: rlccommodate a mix of land uses that meet the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors with places to live, work, shop, be entertained and culturally engaged.

LU- 2: Promote objecrives and development in special planning areas consistent with adopted specific plans, overlay districts, master plans and density bonus provisions.

LU-3: Participate in coordinated local and regional land use planning activiries.

LU-4: Coordinate and integrate land use planning and transportation objecti es.

LU-5: Ensure that ne v development is compatible with eaisting development.

Kefer to Table 1. 3forLU5 Impdementation Action.r
LU- 6: Promote the de elopment of job-generating land uses to support eiisting and future businesses.

LU-7: Preserve Lathrop' s agricultural heritage by protecting and maintaining significant areas of agricultural lands around the city-, and by reducing land use conflicts with agricultural operations.

Circulation
CIR- 1: Develop and maintain a roadway system that accommodates all users.

CIR-2: Create a system of pedestrian, bicycle, and tsansit facilities that enables non- automorive accessibility and increases the health and lieabilit of the community-.

CIR- 3: Support the movement of goods through trucl ing, rail, and other forms of freight service while maintaining quality of life for city residents.

CIR- 4: Plan for the future of transportation to ensure accessibility for all, reduce the environmental impacts of transportation, and impxove the quality oflife.

Economic Development
ED- 1: Retain and expand existing businesses.

F..D- 2: Broaden the local economic base.

ED- 3: Provide diverse workforce housing options.

ED-4: Enhance community quality oflife.

Pa}; c 1- 8
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Public Facilities and Services
PFS- 1: Provide effective, adequate, cost- efficient, and high- quality community services and facilities for residents, businesses, institutions, and visitors in Lathrop.

PFS- 2: Provide existing and projected development with reliable, adequate access to clean, safe and potable water.

PFS- 3: Provide the community vith a wastewater system that is efficient, safe, cost- effective, and able to meet the needs of e sting and future development.

PFS- 4: Provide the community with an efficient, attractive, and environmentally sound stormwater system to accommodate runoff from etisting and ne« development and prevent property damage due to flooding.

PFS- 5: Ensure the community has access to adequate energy services, provided through economically and environmentally sustainable means.

PFS- 6: Ensure state- of-the-art technology and telecommunications senrices for households, businesses, and the community is available throughout the ciry.

PFS- 7: Provide the community vith high- quality public safety services, facilities, and technology that protects against illicit acriviries and crime.

PFS- 8: Coordinate with school districts to provide the community with educational facilities and opportunities that support the continued lifelong learning of all residents.

PFS- 9: Provide the community« ith environmentally responsible waste disposal and recycling services that minimize the generation of disposal of waste.

PFS- 10: Support the use of recycled water to meet water demands.

Public Safery
PS- 1: Prepare the community- for natural hazards related to landslides, geologic instability, and seismic activity to minimize loss of life, injury and property damage, and disruption of vital ser- ices.

PS- 2: Protect the safety of life and property and prepare for urban and wildfire emergencies.

PS- 3: Protect the community from potential flood hazards to minimize loss oflife, injury, and property damage, and disruption of vital services.

PS- 4: Protect the community from the potential for hazardous waste and materials contamination.

PS- 5: Prepare and equip the community to handle emergency situations, in order to minimize loss of life, injury, properry damage, and disruption of vital services.

Yagc 1- 9
Central Lathrop Spccific I' lan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chaptcr One: Introduction PS- 6: Prepare the community to adapt to climate change, including extreme weather events, in order to minunize risks to life, property, the economy, and the environment.

Recreation and Resources
KR- 1: Provide the community with high- quality parks and recreauonal amenities.

RR- 2: Protect and manage natural open space areas to provide scenic beauty and communit enjoyment.

RR- 3: Preserve and protect prehistoric, historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources, to bolster community identity and protect sensitive resources.

RR-4: Protect and maintain animal and plant species, city trees, vaterways, and other supporting biological habitats within I.athrop.

RR- 5: Balance the extraction of mineral resources vith future development and conservation opportunities.

RR- 6: Provide the community vith optimal air quality.

RR-7: Protect the health ofthe bay delta.

RR- 8: Promote vater conservation throughout the region.

Noise
N- 1: Protect residents from the harmful effects of exposure to excessive noise.

N- 2: Protect the economic base of the city by preventing the encroachment of incompatible land uses near noise-producing roadwa s, industries, the railroad, commercial and mited-use districts, and other sources.

Environmental Justice
EJ- 1: PYomote land use and development patterns that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance air qualin-, and reduce climate change impacts in environmental justice communities.

F;J- 2: Take mcasures to reduce pollution eaposure and improve air quality in environmental justice communities.

EJ- 3: Ensure that public facilities and services are equitably distributed throughout the city of I.athrop and are available to residents of environmental justice communities.

EJ- 4: EYpand access to healthy food and nutritional choices for all residents in the community.

Pagc 1- 90
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: InCroduction EJ- 5: Promote and ensure healthy living conditions for all residents, particularly those in environmental justice communities.

EJ- 6: Promote land use and development patterns that encourage physical activity and improve multimodal access and connectivity to employment, shopping, services, schools, parks and other destinations.

EJ- 7: Improve the physical fitness of the Citv' s residents, particularly those who live in environmental justice communities.

EJ- 8: Create accessible and culturally appropriate opportunities for all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income to engage in the decision- making process.

EJ- 9: Prioritize improvements and programs that address the needs of environmental justice communities.

Tab e . 3: LU-5 L.c n l U e Compatil ility Implementationl ction.rfrom the 2022 Lathrop General Plan LU- S. a: Through the development review process, screen de elopment proposals for land use and transportation net ork compatibility with e isting surrounding or abutting development or neighborhoods.

LU- 5. b: Through the development review process, analyze land use compatibility and require adequate buffers and/ or architectural enhancements to protect sensitive receptors from intrusion of development activities that may cause unwanted nuisances and health risks.

LU- 5. c: ' hen industrial projects, including warehouse projects, fulfillment centers, and other projects that may generate high volumes of truck trips and/ or air quality emissions are proposed within 1, 000 feet of esisring or planned residential uses or other sensirive receptors, the City shall require the preparation of a Health Risk Assessment ( HR) that meets the standards established by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard tlssessment ( OEHHA), and the San Joaquin Valley ir Pollution Control District ( SJVAPCD). Projects shall not be approved until it can be demonstrated that the project would not result in an esceedance of the established thresholds of significance for public health risks at nearby sensitive receptors.

LU- 5. d: ' hen industrial projects, including warehouse projects, Eulfillment centers, and other projects that may generate high volumes of truck trips and/ or air quality emissions are proposed within 1, 000 feet of esisting or planned residential uses or other sensitiae receptors, the Cit- shall require the implementation of best management practices ( BNIl' s) to reduce pollution exposure to sensirive receptors, particularly diesel particulate matter( I PI. The appropriate MPs shall be established on a case- by- case basis, and should consider the following tools, methods, and approaches:

Pagc]- 11
Central l, athrop Speciftc Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Intzoducrion Creating physical, structural, and/ or vegetative buffers that adequately prevent or substantially reduce pollutant dispersal between warehouses and any areas where sensitive receptors are likely to be present, such as homes, schools, daycare centers, hospitals, community centers, and parks.

Providing adequate areas for on- site parl;ing, on- site queuing, and truck check-in that prevent trucks and other vehicles from parl ing or idling on public streets.

Placing facility entry and exit points from the public street away from sensitive receptors, e. g., placing these points on the north side of the facility if sensitive receptors are adjacent to the south side of the facility. Exceptions can be made for emergency vehicle access ( EVA) points.

Locating warehouse dock doors and other onsite areas vith significant truck traffic and noise away from sensitive receptors.

Screening dock doors and onsite areas with significant truck traffic and noise with physical, structural, and/ or vegetative barriers that adequately pre rent or substantially reduce pollutant dispersal from the facility to vards sensitive receptors.

Posting signs clearly showing die designated entry and e it points from the public stxeet for trucks and service vehicles.

Posting signs indicating that all parking and maintenance of trucks must be conducted vithin designated on- site areas and not within the surrounding community- or public streets.

I.U- 5. e: Update the Lathrop Municipal Code to include Good Neighbor Uuidelines for `' arehouse Distribution Facilities. The new Good Neighbor Guidelines should include:
a. A definition of the type and size of facility that is subject to the Uuidelines; b. Standards to minunize exposure to diesel emissions to sensitive receptors that are situated in closc prosimit- to the proposed faciliry;
c. Standards and practices that eliminate diesel trucks from unnecessarily traversing through residential neighborhoods;
d. Standards and practices that eliminate trucks from using residential areas and repairing vehicles on the streets;
e. StYategies to reduce and/ or eliminate diesel idling within the facility' s site; LU- S. f: Update the Central Lathrop Specific Plan ( CLSP) to accomplish the follo ving objectives:
a. Bring the Specific Plan' s land use map into consistency vith the General Plan Land lise l Iap Figure LU- 1)
b. Establish a circulation network that keeps future truck trips as far from esisting and planned sensitive receptors as feasible; this includes, but is not limited to, the following requirements, vhich shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan:

Pagc 1- 12
Central Latl op Specific Ylan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction i. Trucks shall be prohibited on Dos Reis Road west and east of Golden Valley Parkway, on Golden Valley Parkway south of Dos Reis Road to Lathrop Road, and on Lathrop Road east of Golden Valley Parkway to Interstate S southbound off-ramp. u. Future truck dependent development projects shall be prohibited from providing driveway access points off of Dos Reis Road, vest of Golden Valley Park vay, other than emergency vehicle access ( EVr1).
ui. Truck traffic within the Limited Industrial Area of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan shall be limited to De Lima Road, and anv future road vays north of llos Reis Road, to connect to Manthey Road, Roth Road, and Interstate 5.
c. Fstablish site design standards for new industrial projects; d. Identify financing and cost- recovery methods to fund roadway and infrastructure improvements.
e. Circulation design standards that promote safe transportation routes that limit impacts to developed areas to the south, and connectivity enhancements to provide better connectivity to I- 5.

Infrastructure improvements to improve roadway operations g. Opportunities to provide employee- serving amenities onsite, such as parks and plazas, outdoor seating areas, fitness facilities, and daycare centers as a means to reduce vehicle trips, vhile supporting air quality, public health, and sustainability goals. h. Include provisions that all development projects proposed north of Dos Reis Road and south of De Lima Road be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit( CUP), which shall be subject to discretionary review by the City Council.

LU- S. g: During the interun period following adoption of this General Plan, and the adoption of the updates to the Central Lathrop Specific Plan, identified in ction LU-Sf, the City shall enforce the following requirements for all Limited Industrial development projects, including warehouse, ciistribution, and logistics projects, vithin the Central Lathrop Specific Plan rlrea:
a. Trucks shall be prohibited on Dos Reis Road west and east of Golden Valley Parl.-way, on Golden Valley Parkway south of Illos Reis Road to Lathrop Road, and on Lathrop Road east of Golden Valley Park vay to Interstate 5 southbound off-ramp. b. Future truck dependent development projects shall be prohibited from providing dri rewa5- access points off of Dos Reis Road, west of Golden Valley Parl-way, other than emetgency ehide access ( EVr1).
c. Truck traffic w-ithin the Lunited Industrial Area of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan shall be limited to De Lima Road, and any future roadways north of Dos Reis Road, to connect to Manthey Road, Roth Road, and Interstate 5.

Pagc 1- 13
Central L, athrop Specific Ylan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introductioa Figure 1. 1- Regional Map
CENTRALI.ATF ROP SPF.CIFIC' PI_,4N PHASE 2 A1 1TND' 1TtiT s > ,
e m s£ 4 ,
j;?
v a i
4 y. r', s ,.,,
a; ,

STOCKTCIN
f
s t' ` r` s° 1,...
a r
q c
z
v t; x
Su v
r2r °
k
r g" vv' .
u
q
r')? 5!"', ° t. Cd.
r'
t 5yy'
r , l'x A
a X
a
y ',
h
p"
wi;,
9"
F
r i
y "''
y%'
x i a
t aw m r,
ati
99 4r
ri
rr z
i"" a " d"u? Y;' I
r`
v r '
a
sr;
N
9 CL5P3RMEvDh1EN7
p,
s
r'"
s"<`, PLANkREA
p
a My
CEsp- p nr
ARfA
r wV ., ' z ,

44. ' IAFffROP s" r
a t
I
t
y
1 r
I.ATHROP
I lviAN7EfA
r
vi
y i S qqq
C' t o
F wx
za$
x N
TRACY
c :` f`; a
a' ..

F` % j s,
aw,
j i
f', y, i ,¢ " r,. f` t
y"
r
d . l eab.:" wmerr..: ,. ... xx a' r % .
a
1 f7
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area Figure 1. 1
NOMtN GityLimits
7 s
Sphere of influence RE IONAL MAP
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
Page]- 14
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chaptcr One: Introduction Figure 1. 2- Vicinity Map
CENTRAL LATE[ ROP SPECIFiC PLAN PHASE 2 AMEN DMENT
i
1 p
CLSP—z AMENDMEN X ,
y

PLAN AREA
t
l
if t, j i
rrraAwMrw+ar n r s www. f _
y,,:: l
g;.. 1
m t
r. p . 3x I
1 5 i
e
w;
t rr rrrr. e r,. x i
i 2
t SFnRtAv a! .

A
4 w,av W
i :',::' . SP- t '
ia Hnapno n
r.
w:' PIAN e t.. i
ssti d AREA w¢ ; 1:
s t
Aq, y q
rwM
4 1 IWiAIVT 1_f1
M4 I f
a X i 1
a, MOSSDALE : n
I` LAN D I N G •••••+
Eou+s aveau
r• Iy
r'
f
LATNROP 1 ;
s ° f
1 i y&
r
r1
x „,` a r. '
p.
1 i
i
3" gy g ' YV YDSEtv6E7E Ati/ENUE...
3 rr w !
Y
1 . a a,
i* . > , r .., ..:
k
yr" c ` ' i
1 x '+
I 2 " a s '..
a a,
I,i i~
i' '
120
ri
t* :i- W+"+'"
s'
L F CiE= N fJ
CLSP- 2 Amendment PCan Area F1gUre 1. 2
N O p T N
ity limits
T. S
Sphere of influence VICINITY MAP
q( s Central Lathrop Specific Ptan- Phase 2 Amendment
x°
Lakhrop, Ca

Page 1 ends

Central l, athrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Goals ofthe Specific Plan Provide roadway improvements and land use The CLSP is intended to provide for the orderly
planning that will tie together vith ehisting
development.
and systematic development of an integrated fullservice community in a manner consistent with Establish a logical phasing plan that assures goals and policies of the City and compatible that each phase of development will include with site characteristics. The primary goals of the all necessary public improvements required CLSP- 2 Amendment are designed to achieve the to meet City standards. following:

Add value to the existing and future City of
F.stablish a comprehensive land use plan that I,athrop community and contribute to the will guide development of the appro imately establishment of a strong local economic 724- acre CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. base through ( a) job creation and ( b) the economic stimulus that comes from the
Update thc City' s
long- term vision for the multi-million- dollar investment required to CLSP- 2 lmendment Plan Area in
develop the Central Lathrop Specific Plan
accordance vith the 2022 Lathrop General and the disposable income ofthe people uho Plan, by incorporating refinements designed live and vark in the Plan l rea. to reflect e rolving innovation in land use
planning concepts. Implement the development program
envisioned for the Central Lathrop Specific
Establish a regional industrial development Plan on property diat the Lathrop 2 0 2 2 area adjacent to the I- 5
freeway that makes eneral Plan designates for Limited
use of the visibility and prune freeway access Industrial uses. provided by the Roth Road Interchange.

To the eatent feasible, provide a selfMasimize passive recreational opportunities mitigating project, where mitigation
through the creation of a comprehensive
measures are incorporated into the CLSP- 2
linear park and open space system located l mendment and future project designs=so as adjacent to and providing access to the San to minimize environmental impacts.

Joaquin River.

Provide a logical and orderly ettension of the
Uenerate positive fiscal benefits for the City City of Lathrop that is compatible vith and resulting from the regional industrial
complements ekisting and planned land uses
development. vithin other portions of the City.

Increase employment and shopping Satisfy the City policies, regulations and opportunities for City residents.
espectations as defined in the Lathrop
General Plan and 1 itmicipal Code.

Provide job- generating land uses in close
proaimity to residential uses in order to
Provide services andinfrastructure that meet
minimize home- to- vork vehicular trip or e ceed City standards and that do not lengths, automobile usage and related air
minish services to esisting residents of the
quality impacts.

City-.

Provide an integrated, efficient, and safe Enrich the relationship between the City and cixculation system for pedestrians, bicyclists,
the San Joaquin River by incorporating the
transit and vehicles. river' s edge as a critical component of the i' age 1- 16
Cc itral Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Central Lathrop Specific Plan parks and Few trees, aside from the orchard trees, eYist open space program. beyond those along the riverbed and on rural residential sites. A few rural roads ( Manthey
These Central Lathrop Specific Plan goals are Road, De I.ima Road, and Dos Reis Road) cross consistent with the goals of the Lathrop General or border the Plan r rea to pro ide access to the Plan. river, farmlands, and rural residences. No known
major utilit easements or facilities are present,
Cot text e cept for water lines in Dos Reis Road, De Lima Location Road, and a portion of Manthey Roads; and a
storm drain force main in Dos Reis Road that
I.athrop is located within the southwest quadrant serves esisting develop east of Interstate- 5. of San Joaquin County. The Central Lathrop
Specific Plan area is located within the north vest Plant habitats are isolated within narrow area of the City. See Figure 1. 1: Regional Map. corridors located along portions of the San Joaquin River. All lands have been modified by
The CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area human activities. The area is generally flat, with a encompasses appro unately 724 acres located slight fall from east to west towards the San south of the city limit line, north of Dos Reis Rd, Joaquin River. 'I"he area is protected from Elood vest of Interstate 5, and east of the San Joaquin hazards by the levee paralleling the ri er.

River. See Figure 1? for the Vicinity Map. Ground vater is relatieely shallo v. No parcels are under Villiamson Act contracts.

Property Oavrier.rhip
dJaceyrt Uses
The CLSP- 2 Amendment encompasses 724 acres
divided among 25 e
isting parcels. Figure 13 lists A variety of e isting land uses surrounds the the property owners. CLSP- 2 mendment Plan Area. To the south of Dos Reis Road from west to east is a planned
Exz.rtind Site Conclition. r and U.res community park and open space trail along the The CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan Area consists
levee; the existing Lathrop High School sports
primarily of undeeeloped land and agriculture
Felds and ausiliary parking area, undeveloped
uses, along with the esisting Dos Reis Regional
land designated as Residential Nlixed L se, and
Park and boat launch, and arious etisting rural
undeveloped land designated as Office
residences. ' I'he e
sting Dos Reis Regional Park Commercial. To the west is the San Joaquin River is located adjacent to the San Joaquin Ri- er alvng
and to the north is San Joaquin Counn- land with
the west side of the CLSP- 3 r mendment Plan existing agriculture and industrial uses. Interstate 3rea. The undeveloped land and esisting
5 is east of the Plan Area.
agriculture uses comprise the majority of the Jarrie-dictional Context remaining land acreage extending from the San
Joaquin Kiver, east to Manthey Road and Since the City approved the 2004 CLSP, the Intexstate- 5. See Figure 1. 4 for Esisting CLSP Plan Area has been annexed into the City Conditions Map. of Lathrop. The area or portions thereof, are vithin the juriseiiction of the Manteca L?nified
Dos Reis Park, a
county/ state facility located School District, Reclamation District 17 ( RDalong the San Joaquin River at the end of Dos 17), and the Lathrop Manteca Fire District Reis Road, while a
part of the CLSP-? 1' D). No changes to the boundaries of these Amendment Plan rea, is intended to remain districts are proposed. under county/ state ownership and maintenance.

Pagc 1- 17
Central Lathxop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amcndment Chapter One: Introduction Figure 1. 3- Existing Ownership Map
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECiFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
II I
au
5 al
t
t/' c,:: r1
2 V
2 ` v
Q'

I I III
J
s .-- ' SPARTANi WAY
I ' ` -
s
c
PROPERTY PIRCEL PRpPER1Y PARCEI
Eo. B . Q tld B
t t42- 029- 6tQ $ WBG NVEST4ENY LLC ETAL tOp. 6 12 192- 020- 220 WRELp. S Qc F ETN. 5.D 2 192- 020- 620 CFWW. St1RJl SNGH f00.0 f3 192- 020- 480 SAN. IO UIl J COINIIY 9.4 3 KAS YIR KM1R PARItS REC
3 192- OZp- 630 CliNW. SUR,MT SNGk1 tp5.6 U 192- OYO- 520 DOYLE. UANEL Y IR 8.6 3 KI SH49t KAUR 15 192- 020- 196 pOYi, E. QANEL Y iR 8,1 4 192- 02a- 640 C1W1Al SUR.R1 5 1'IGH I06.9 i6 192- 02U- 18Q CIIY Oi tAiHROP 19. 6 dr NASITYMt KAdIR t7 192- 020- 586 SAYBROQK CLSP LLC 9. 8 5 192- 020- Q60 DURCA BlGRATH g 15.2 18 192- 020- 690 SAY6ROOK CLSP LLC 9.0 PO7TALA SREEtAFNR TR 19 192- 020- ifi0 1EN t, FLORIAN D 5. 0 6 192- 020- 070 IIIOY R. OON l ETK 1. 5 20 192- 02fl- 360 1ffNOR. i)ELIA ETAL 5.0 7 192- 42t1- D80 NAOYfR. OON L ELY. t4. 9 21 192- 020- 700 SAt'800K CL'SP lLC i4.5 8 192- 20- 0 N701, R. DON+Lp LOUS 16,4 M 192- 020- 140 00S RELS RANCFI. MIC 89.8 4 192- p2- 65p CITY Of UIHROP 24. 2 3 192- 024- 1f0 HOf',AH. RICIIARCI h 2.0 10 19Y- 020- 660 CIIY aF tATNROP i KATtftTN A
11 192- OYO- 38t1 G4 IMT LqNS! IC 5.0 1 192- 02U- 020 ApyMl( I TtbC 0.8 WCtfMING WC EiN.
25 19- 020- 03Q tERRICK KARA lE TR 0.9
LEGEND
O PROPERTYI. D.

ClSP-2 AMENDMENT PLAN AREA BOUNDARY Figure 1. 3
o r H _. _._._

ISTING PROPERTY LINES
N. T. S. EXISTING OWNERSHIP MAP
Central Lathrap Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
r'
Lathrop, Ca
r
z-3.[ f.';.:

Page]- 18
Central Lathrop SpeciHc Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Figure 1. 4- Existing Conditions Map
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMEN` I'
x., ,
r
d . . . -
w.

IRQTH oAo
b
e
a.
1 ,
l
a
t e .
pr,/' a r ` 3" z y r s., t,:
r' i?/,.. o'" Z`' x, a xy (.
y
r
x °, ,
g; CpMAtER AUMf7U57RlALI
z
r

AGRICUCTURE
y n' o
SAN lOAQUIN
y
e/'' CDUNTY') I
r r
i
s
d
h
y
14i AI i e4r MrM w w '
3/
6 d=b
F f f! II/ i i i
i
x8 ' s'
1 4`l
s * ;
4& a&.

AGRIt13LTURE
i RD• 17 tEVEE RECYCLED
t WATER PONE7
DE L1MA ROAD
r35nrvc
RECYCIECt WA7' ER
5117ENT AE
y
OOS REIS PARK f w;
SPRAY FIEt p S..
a M 5.
r cRRcc ru pp
t
D 75 RF ROAL1 s;; ;
SAh' JVAi UIN
r"'. irM i
F... •"
i . o
COUVrp) FU7UREP RK tATHROo FUTIfh' EMlXED FUTURE
A
L NI N SCHQOL, tfSE Ct7MMfHftA{ F. r
F
I SPARTANWAY c
r.,`';.°;
z
o r Q Exisf nrc"
ti' f'a ceosiro co crn- acrr t o ,. c
nh
LF.CiF,NL)
CI, SP-: Amendment Plan Ar oandary
Fi Qure 1. 4
NORTH v
5 EXISTING CONDITIQNS MAP
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
Pagc 1- 19
Central l, athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptcr One: IntrodUction Legal Authorrty Relationship to Other City Policies,
Progtams, and Documents
Z'he City of Lathrop, as a general law city, will
adopt this Specific Plan Amendment, and other The supporting documents described below project related documents by resolution in establish the foundation and/ or provide accordance with the provisions of rlrticle 8, direction for the implementation of this CLSP- 2 Sections 65450 through 65457 of the California mendment. These documents will be utilized in Government Code. These provisions require that conjunction with the CLSP- 2 Amendment to a specific plan be consistent vith the City' s ensure the unplementation of the General Plan' s adopted general plan. All other subsequent goals and policies. entitlements and approvals must also be
consistent with the Lathtop General Plan. Capital Pacilities Fee Program State law also requires that all subsequent
The City' s Capital Facilities Fee program
subdivisions and developments ( including publie
identifies the capital improvements needed for
works projects) within the Phase 2 Plan Area, as
development This document establishes a
vell as all zoning regulations applicable to the variety of financing vehicles and fees to pay for Phase 2 Plan rlrea, must be consistent with this public infrastructure and communitv facilities to CLSP- 2 Amendment. serve the new development areas.

Belation. rhip to the I_athrop General Plan Mirniczpal Code The C'7eneral Plan establishes the goals, policies, Special zoning districts have been created for the land uses, and standards for development vithin
CLSP Plan rea. These special zoning districts
the Ciry. ' I"he following related plans,
end in " CL" to designate these land use
incorporated b refeYence, provide additional categories as unique to the Central Ladlrop detailed direction for future development of the
Specific Plan area. The amended zoning
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan c1Yea.
categories for the Phase 2 Plan Area are
described in detail later in this CLSP- 2
f a.rtezvater, lYlaterartdBecyc• led lti" aterMa. rter Amendment and aYe incorporated into d1e Plans Lathrop Municipal Code.
astewater ( collection and treatrnent), water Developrrterrtfgree nerat supply and distribution), and recycled water
wastewater disposal) master plans were adopted De' elopment Agreements to be potenually by the City. These plans identif impYovements enteYed into between the City and landowners needed to seree current and future land uses at
thin the Plan Area can est, or " lock in"
build out and provide a basis for the orderly
development rights. Development agreements
e
pansion of potable, waste, and recy-cled water
can establish the responsibilities of landowners
facilities. In conjunction with other plans, these th respect to the construction and financing of documents establish phasing and costs. public infrastructure, the dedication of land, and other development- related obligations.

Bicyc•le Trunsportatiora Master 1' lan
I:nvironmeratallynpc ct Ke ort
The City of Lathrop' s Bicycle Transportarion
Master Plan establishes goals, policies, routes
Refer to the Implementation chapter for details
and standards for birycle transportation and regarding the relationship between the CLSP- 2 facilities within the City. l mendment and the EIRs prepared with the origina1200 CI_SP and the 2022 General Plan.

Page 1 ends

Central Lathrop Speciflc Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter One: Introduction Organization ofthe Speeific Plan e ecuted, including development phasing strategies and the permitting process for
The CLSP- 2 rlmendment is organized as follows:
dividual development proposals.

Chapter One: Introduction - discusses the
Chapter Nine: Financing - describes anticipated
purpose, planning context, primary goals, and
project construction and maintenance needs and
scope of the Specific Plan mendment. financing mechanisms, and the key° financing options that are available to fund these costs.

Chapter T vo: Land Use - describes the way in
which the land uses that comprise the CLSP- 2
Amendment Plan rlrea are organized and
includes a discussion of the general character of
such uses, their locarion within the Plan Area, the
intensities of use, and the goals associated with
each of the designated land uses.

Chapter Three: Circulation and Transportation -
eYplains the CLSP- 2 Amendment roadway
network in the context of the local, city, and
regional transportation and circulauon patterns,
and the system of pedestrian and bic}'cle paths.

Chapter Four: Natural Resources Managementdescribes the ways in vhich the environmental features of the plan aYea are integrated into the
CLSP- 2 Amendment and the program to protect
these features, as well as to allow them to be
enjoyed by residents and non- tesidents alike.

Chapter Five: Community Sen-ices and Facilities
describes the needs for communitv services and
facilities that will result from the development of
the CLSP- 2 r mendment and the wa in which
these needs will be addressed.

Chapter Six: Utilities and Drainage Infrastructure
discusses the various utility and citainage
improvements required to serve the Phase 2 P1an
rlrea.

Chapter Seven: Design Guidelines - provides the
site planning, including landscape and open
space, and architectural standards for each land
use, further ensuring a high- quality and unique
development.

Chapter Eight Implementltion - describes the
way in which the CLSP- 2 Amendment will be
Yage 1- 21
Centcal l,athrop Spccific Plan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chaptcr I'wo: l. and Usc Chapter Two: Land Use
Introduction The Land Use Plan was influenced by a variety of factors including physical site constraints and
The Land Use and Development Plan is the adjacent land uses as discussed in Chapter One. primary implementing component of the CLSP2 mendment. This chapter summarizes the This CLSP-21 mendment may evolve o rer time, different land uses proposed, refines land use taking into consideration market change and types that are identified in the 2022 General Plan
community desires and needs. ! s property
and lists the development standards. " This
owners and builders develop theit properries,
chapter, including the Land Use Plan, describes they will be required to follow the Site Plan the land use designations and zoning. The 2022 Review process and, if applicable, obtain a General Plan Land Use Map and the CLSP- 2
Conditional Use Permit. The development plans
r mendment Land Use Plan govern the land uses for each property will be designed based on the in the CLSP Phase 2 Plan Area. policies and standards contained in this Specific Plan Amendment.

Existing and Interim Land Uses
E isring agricultural uses, recycled water storage
Overall, the CLSP- 2 Amendment designates
onds, a ricultural irri ated with rec cled water
618? acres of Limited Industrial uses, 112 acres
pnd sevea1 rural residences are located within the
of Parks, and 29. 3 acres of Open Space in Phase
CLSP- 2 mendment Plan Area. 1' hese existing
J
uses will remain until the property is developed
Lattd Use Platl
and therefore referred to in this document as
Interim Uses. The CLSP- 2 Amendment is designed to create a range of employment uses along with some
The esisting uses within the CLSP Phase 1 Plan recreational uses along the San Joaquin River rlrea include earious residential neighborhoods levee system for City residents and employees. commonly referred to as Stanford Crossing, a
The CI..SP- 2 Amendment Plan l rea
high school, a
community center, teen
encompasses approsimatelti- 7 3 4 acres. Refer to
center/ library, several public neighborhood Figure 2. 1. The o erall Phase 2 Plan r rea land parks, and some commeYcial development. Some uses, acreages, and intensities of use are agricultural uses and rural residences remain vill summarized in Table ?. 1; this summary remain until developed in the future in
represents the build- out of the CLSP- 2
accordance with the Lathrop General Plan. menciment Plan r rea.

The CLSP- 2 Amendment development The Land Use l fap ( Figure 2. 1) illustrates the standards for the Phase 2 Plan c rea are land uses vithin the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan consistent with the development standards in the
rea. Table 2. 1 provides a summary of these
City of Lathrop' s 7_.oning Ordinance. Separate land uses. The acreage and allowable square Design Guidelines appl as set forth in Chapter footages for each land use category mac vary Seven. slightly from these acreages shown depending on
more accurate survey data and the final alignment

Page 2 ends

entral], athrop Specific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter' I'wo: land Use of roadways and required open space; however,
the total acreages and building square footage
establish an approsimate carrying capacit for the
Plan Area.

Landscape Buffer
A landscape buffer shall be provided along the
north side of Dos Reis Road as illustrated in
Figure 2. 2 with two ( 2) different design themes.
3t locations where existing or proposed Land
Use on the south side of Dos Reis Road includes
sensitive receptors, the landscape buffer shall
include a 30- foot-wide landscape corridor vithin
the public right- of- vay including 22' of
landscaping and a 8' paved sidewalk as well as an
additional buffer on the adjacent private
development parcels. At other locations on Dos
Reis Road where Commercial or Industrial use is
proposed to the south, the landscape buffer shall
include a 26- foot- vide landscape corridor vithin
the public right- of-way including 18 feet of
landscaping and an 8 foot paved sidewalk as well
as an addirional buffer on the adjacent private
development parcels. The additional buffer on
the adjacent private development parcels in both
scenarios shall be determined during the Site Plan
Review process for each specific development
project.

Page??
Central]. athcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter' I'wo:], and Use Figure 2. 1- Land Use Map
C` L•NTR I. I.. AT fRf) P SPECIFIC PLAN PH, ASF? ? A1 9T?N' 2El T r. r
tiy W a'
r`" x,"r. t-.
oz
ww.--...
s,,..._........
a w .---——-
m STREET A I I
I i
C L[- CL L(- CL u,
I i
I i I
DE LIMA R4AD c.. 7
LI- C STi EET D___;' 4, .
r-==_r---- j-— —— ————- q
LIrG,,-, i LI-GL Q
QL I I ! DQS REIS ROAI CLSP PHASE 2
ww e
1 s r
CLSP PF{ASE 1
LA'CHRpP RESiDEYTiALI

QFFICE R
CO fhiERCIAL PARI FIiC1I' bilk`EU U5E

SL' HOOL
r`
SPFtRTAf WAY LATHROP ROAD
F ,
rs w*"'
yf"# p
r
r;. 1' Q.. a. ,,%, x k
w*
w S
j
Q
i
x'
µ"" x
G 4 Q
a< Q
4, r
i f
f'`
rrra swrs Nw r f
M
f
r, s
r
R
n
r
f
v, t R
r
1 z r r
4 z f
s "'`
y ,; y
4 s„ . d ,
k, " a
iw w rrt a ya w
r
RIVER ISLANDS PKWY ENUE :_"
LBGGVD
Limitcd Industrisl( Ll-C' 1.) Exis[ing Pr xrty Lincs
Park( P- ft. RaadRigh- 0# WavLincs
0}u e Space iO3- CL} Potential Road AightAf- Way Linas if Needed Far Aere. s a o n r H "'
LSP-_' Atnendntent Plan Ar l3nuodary Figure 2. 1
ti T. s ...... La. P a, r,: LAND USE MAP
Y s Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
m

Page 2 ends

Central l.athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter" I'wo: I,and Use Figure 2.2- Landscape Buffer
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
tMA ROAD
STftEETD
q4
W
h:a , .
s k. . 5e,^,, u a:,.. u. wu u • ,,.....
a ,. . . . ,:.,,„-
S:',
aos is RoA .„ ,
e ,
z
z A i B
w
W aQ
ek v k
C
Lro/. IA
r''
a:;: -
l"
N /
r. . .., .

Y
m
I / '
Y" e
lf. ti)
6'• 30' LanQuapt Buffer WirAin F' ublic Right- Of-W'ay
Additional ButTcr R ithin Private Pro{+rrty
36' W10SCAPE @UFFEfl
POYI _ wITMIN PI18UC RTGHT• Of• WAY
FON
AWIifONAi BUFFER WITNIN PPIVA7E —
PAOPERTY TO 8E DETE IINED WiiH
n
DEVELOPN£ NT APPIIGATIONS. a
4 A 6 d , p
a
9 q
9 C j° 66
I
Q
Ml1ITI0NA1 LaH65CAPf BUFFER
Nt1Alf SITE M2TriIN PRI4Air PNOPEATY
Y AA
NOR1H gs' SOUTN
AhDSCAPE EUFF6R SECTION
STANFORb CROSSING TO
ti{) LDEN VALLEY PARKWAY
Gfr 26` LANOSCAPE BUFPEB
p
f
N' ITNtN PUBLIC HIOH7- Oi YlAX
ApDITIONAI BUFFEP WI7HIN PRIVATE
PF6PERTY TO BE DE7ERMINEO WIfli d
EVELOPYENT APPLICA7IONS. EXANPiE d
4, •^, 4 4•
p '
4 BUFFER SHONN INClU0E5 S7081kMATEF p
fl °'' d n •' 1
I
pdQo edty fl `
DUAltil" TAEATI Nt AREA
2' 2 '
T
SWTH
NORTH pSCAPE BUFf6R SECT' ION
GOLDGN WALLGY PARK14`,AY Fl ure 2. 2
N O F T H TO MANTHEY ROAD g

S LANDSCAPE BUFFER
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
Page Z- 4
entral], athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptcr Two: I, and Use Table 2. 1: CLSP- 2 Amenclment Land U.re Summary
Maximum Potential
Designation Land Use Area( acres)
Building Square Building Square
Footage at Max Footage at Target
FAR of 1. 0 SF FAR of 0. 75 SF
LI- CL Limited Industsial [ 1] 618. 2 26, 928, 792 20, 196, 594 OS- CL Open Space 29. 3 1, 27G, 308 957, 231
P- CL Paxk 11. 2 487, 872 365, 904
Major Road Right- of-Way 65. 3 2, 844, 468 2, 133, 351
Total 724. 0 31, 537, 440 23, 653, 080
1] Allowable FAR. of 1. 0 peY the 2022 General Plan
2] Target PAR of 0. 75
The above table represents the proposed deaelopment acreages by land use. Calculated acres are based upon the overlay of the land uses onto a property boundary map compiled from record dimensions only not a field survey). Actual acres may vary slightly, but vill be confirmed with each development application.

Land Use Desigrtations Limited Indzrstrial
The following sections define and discuss the The Limited Industrial ( I,I) use applies to most land use designations that occur within the Plan of the Plan Area. ' I'he Limited Industrial use Area. 7'he Central Lathrop combining district spans from the northern project boundary along CL) is applied to all properties located within the Lathrop' s city lunits, southern boundary along CLSP- 21 menciment Plan rea. The designation Dos Reis Road, and eastern boundary along of CI, after any zoning district indicates that the Interstate Highway 5 as shown in FiguYe 2. 1. It is zoning distxict so combined is modified by the anricipated that uses such as warehousing and regulations included in the CLSP-? rlmendment manufacturing that do not require a high degree and those districts included in Chapter 17. 62 of of visibility and are truck dependent, will be the Lathrop I Zunicipal Code. located in areas of the Plan rea that minunize the potential for air quality and noise impacts to
Permitted uses, condirionally- permitted uses, and sensiri e receptors outside the Plan Area. The development criteria can be found in the same CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan rea is envisioned to chapter of the Code. Of articular note is that the accommodate a vide range of jobs generating 2022 General Plan rec uires a Conditional Use uses, including business parks; clean light Permit ( CUP1 for all develo ment between Dos industrial; research and development ( R& D); Reis Road and De Lima Road. science, technology, engineering, and math STF_; tech/ biotech manufacturing; high-tech
The Plan r rea consists of three land use services that incorporate some combination of designations including Limited Industrial, Park, assembly; warehousing, and/ or sales; hospitals, and Open Space. A vell thought out circulation labs and other health care- related uses, and pattern allows for vehicular, birycle and distribuuon centers. Refer to the City of pedestrian connections between the uses. Lathrop' s Zoning Ordinance for the full range of

Page 2 ends

Central Lathcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter" I'wo: l.and lJse permitted and conditionally permitted uses under information regarding Nonconforming Uses and this land use category. A maximum allowable Structures.

Floor rea Ratio ( FAR) of 1. 0 is permitted
consistent with the 2022 General Plan. Right- to- Farm provisions are discussed in Chapter Four of this document.

Operz Space
Calculation ofLand Use Intensities and
The CLSP- 2 Amendment designates Open Space
qjjowable Sq'uate Footages
OS) uses along the San Joaquin River and this
designation spans the length of the Plan Area. Future project- specific development applications This area is designed to provide an open space will be based on the maYimum allowable net corridor consistent with the Lathrop General square footage for a particular parcel or parcels.

Plan. The open space corridor along the San The masimum allowable square footage for a Joaquin River is intended as a local communiry particular parcel vill be calculated by multiplying wide facility with die possibility of regional the surveyed net developable area ( in acres) linkage. This Open Space Carridor vould also comprising the subject parcel by the allowable connect the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan rlrea vith Floor Area Ratio ( Fr1R) for the associated land developing and existing segments of this open use designation. The acreage used in this space corridor to the south within CI,SP Phase 1 calculation may vary slightly froin the acreage and the Mossdale Village developments. Though shown in the Land Use Map and Table 2. 1 and not required or mandated, this CLSP- 2 will be determined by more accurate survey and mendment accommodates the construction boundar- data and the final street alignments and and use of outdoor recreation facilities such as right of vay- vidth. recreation fields, fitness equipment and courses,
or other such uses intended foY the physical The CLSP- 2 Amendment contemplates Limited recreation and well-being of the community Industrial development at an average rather than and/ or the employee use s. Refer to the CLSP- 2 a masimum Floor rea Rario ( FAR) as specified Amendment . 7.oning Ordinance for the full range in Table 3. 1. Specific development sites will likely of permitted uses in this land use category. develop at a taYget Fr R of 0. 75 or lower depending on parl:ing demand, landscaping and
Park open space, storm vater management, and other
site requirements.

I'he CLSP- 2 Amendment retains the Dos Reis
Cotmty Park designation, a Counry park vithin Land Use and Srte Layout Flexibility City limits. r n additional Park area is proposed
to connect the park to the future open space The I.and Use Map ( Figuxe 2. 1) illustrates die corridor described abo e. general locations and distribution of land uses in the Plan l rea as described earlier in this chapter.

Because the build- out of the CI, SP- 2 I"his Land lise Plan is diagrammatic and does not Amendment Plan rea is anticipated to occur necessarily repxesent final road alignments, land over an eYtended period of years, these Interim use configurations or acteages.

Uses may remain present for many ears.

The CLSP- 2 Amendtnent land uses may be
Interim I gricultural uses are subject to further refined in conjunction with the Agricultural Development Standards and Use processing of future parcel maps and site plan Regulations set forth in the Lathrop Zoning applications, vithout requiring a Specific Plan Ordinance. Refer to Chapter 17. 116 of the Amendment as further ciiscussed below. Given Lathrop Zoning Ordinance for specific that the Land Use 1ap is conceptual in nature,

Page 2 ends

Central Lathzop Specific Plan— 1' hase 2 lmendment Chapter Two: l, and Usc the CLSP- 2 Amendment provides flexibility with described in the Design Uuidelines respect to the location, design, and detailed Chapter Seven), unplementarion of the Land Use Plan during the
City' s revie vs of future detailed applications. o Consistent applicauon of the stated Land Use and Site Design flexibility may include, principles set forth in the CLSP- 2 but is not limited to, the following: Amendment and the Citv General Plan, Relocating collector roads and/ or
o Potential economic benefits of a
intersections to correspond to existing particular land use, building type, site properry lines, feature, configuration of buildings, road alignment, or other deviation from the
Relocaung collector roads and/ or Specific Plan that would outweigh the intersections to accommodate a specific benefits of strict adherence to the CLSPde elopment program, building product 2 l mendment development standards ty es, or parcel lay out arrangement, and Zoning Code, and/ or Relocating collector roads to allo v for more o The employment benefit of a land use, efficient use of parcelization for building and configuration, or other factor within the parl ing areas on- site, CLSP- 2 Plan Area which deviates from the CLSP- 2 r mendment.

Minor deviations in land use intensin ( Floor
1rea Ratio) and development standards for Refer to Chapter 8: Implementation for mare particular projects, with the concurrence of information regarding site plan and land use reviewing agencies, as determined bv CDD flexibility at the site plan review stage including and if compatible and consistent with the pYoject review procedures, de- elopment purpose and intent of the Specific Plan agreements, specific plan amendment procedures, enforcement, mitigation monitoring,
llowance for use types not specitled in and other review and approvals required during Lathrop' s Zoning Ordinance, which are the implementation of the CLSP-? mendment. compatible and consistent with the purpose
and intent of the land use designation and Land Use Regulations and Development zoning classification ( to be approved by the Statldat' ds Community Development Director)
I'he CI.SP- 2 Amendment is consistent with the
l djustments to travel lanes as supported by 2022 General Plan land use designations as listed trafflc studies.
below and consistent with the development
standards in the Lathrop Zoning Ordinance and
cceptability of final land use and site the`' arehouse Good Neighbor Guidelines. layouts will be evaluated based upon the
following criteria/ findings: Limite l Inclzrstrial( LI) Development Standards The Lathrop 7oning Ordinance specifies the
o Consistency with the prescribed land use
minimum lot area, lot width, setbacks, and other
development and design standaYds, in
development standards for the Limited Industrial
accord vith the CLSP- 2 mendment to
LI) designation. Limited Industrial
the Specific Plan,
developments shall be further subject to the
o Building, parking, and site design design guidelines in Chapter Seven. consistency for each land use parcel as
Open Space ( OS) Developmerat Standarcls
Page Z- 7
Central Latluop Speeific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendmcnt Chapter" I' wo: l, and Use I"he Lathrop 7_oning Ordinance includes
development standards for the Open Space ( OS)
designation. Open Space uses may also be subject
to design guidelines contained within Chapter
Seven.

Park Development Standards
The Zoning Ordinance defines the development
standards for the Park designation. Park uses may
also be subject to design guidelines contained in
Chapter Seven.

Yage 2- 8
Centrall, athtop Specific Plan— I' hase 2 Amendment hapter Theee: Circulation and' 1' ransportation Chapter Three: Circulation and Transportation
Introduetion an interconnected system of trails, which are pedestrian and bicy*cle friendly.

This chapter describes the proposed circulation
system and transportation impro rements EX1St11Ig' C011CI1t101IS included in the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area.

On-Site Roadzvay Netavork
The Circulation Plan is designed to allo v for
efficient circulation to and from the CLSP- 2
Land uses at the time of the CLSP-? Amendment
Amendment Plan Area. Z' he plan provides for approval are agricultural and large lot/ rural multiple modes of transportation incluciing residential parcels. Because of this land use automobile, truck, bus transit, bicycle, and pattern, the existing roadway net vork is sparse pedestrian. This chapter provides the vith one north- south road vay ( I anthe Road) requirements of Plan Area road vays, bikeways, and two east west- roadways ( De Lima Road and and walk vays as well as public transit. The Dos Reis Road). implementation of the CLSP- 2 rlmendment will
provide additional roadway, bus transit, bic cle, i 2anthey Road is a paved two-lane roadway that and pedestrian linkages between the Plan rea parallels I-5 Erom the CLSP- 2 Amendment_ Plan and the surrounding communities, improving rea and continues North towards the Roth connectivity vithin this portion of the City. Road interchange and beyond. This roadway has The Circulation Plan provides connections to
no curb and gutter w7th minimal shoulders. De
existing and future road vays as identified in the
I ima Road and Dos Reis Road are t vo- lane
City of Lathrop' s General Plan Circulation roadways that e tend west from Manthey Road Diagram. These connections provide both to the San Joaquin River le ree. The road vays regional and local mobilin- between land uses have shoulders but no curb and gutter. within and adjacent to the Plan Area. It is the
intent of the Circulation Plan to compl with the See Figure 3. 1 for Existing Circulation Plan. requirements of the Surface Transportation
Assistance Act ( STA). The phasing and Of-Site Roceclivay Net2vork ( KedionalArea) financing of the proposed roadway
improvements is summarized in Chapter Nine There are a number of major regional roadway s Financing Plan. that are located in close prosimiry to the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan l rea. T'hese road vays include
Circulation and Transportation Goals Interstate 5, Interstate 205, State Route 120, and State Route 99. These roadways are outside of
I'he transportation system for the CLSP- 2
the Plan tlrea but will be utilized by vehicles
rlmendment Plan Area provides a multi-modal entering and esiting the CLSP- 2 Plan Area. network that serves the needs of all the proposed
land uses in the Plan AYea by establishing an Interstate 5, one of the major freeways in the integrated, efficient, and safe circulation system state of California, forms the eastern boundary- of for transit and vehicles; linl ing roadwa s and the CLSP Plan Area. In San Joaquin County, I- 5 transit routes in the Plan llrea to the City' s connects Stockton to Tracy and passes through e
isung transportation network, and pro iding Lathrop. Given its location, I- 5 vill serve as one Pagc 3- 1
Central l,athrop Speciftc Plan— Yhase 2 Amendmem Chapter' 1' hree: Circul ttion and' I'ransportation of the primary routes for traffic entering and There are essentially no e sting bicycle or exiting the Plan Area. pedestrian facilities in the CLSP-2 r mendment Plan r rea. However, there are pedestrian and
There are three freeway interchanges adjacent to bicycle facilities in the CLSP Phase 1 area and in the Plan Area. The First interchange, Louise the adjacent specific plan areas including Avenue/ River Islands Parkway, is located to the I lossdale Village and River Islands that will be south and provides access to the CLSP Plan connected to the planned facilities within the Area, Mossdale Village and River Islands. The CLSP- 2 mendment Plan Area at Uolden Valley second interchange, Lathrop Road/ Spartan Way, Park-way and Stanford Crossing as displayed on is located in the middle of the o`rerall CLSP and Figure 3. 10 Pedestrian and Bicy-cle Circulation provides direct access to the Plan Area. The third Plan. interchange, Roth Road, is located north of the
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area, and will be the Fxi.rtin; Tran.rit Netzvork primary point of access for trucks to the Plan
rlrea. A study of the Roth Road corridor from The City of Lathrop does not operate any local Manthey Road to State Route 99 is being sen-ing transit routes. Ho vever, there are transit conducted by San Joaquin County>, through the
routes that operate in the regional area. These
San Joaquin Council of Go ernments ( SJCOG)
routes include fited- route regional bus service
at the rime this CLSP- 2 Amendment is being
and tle ible 6 ed route bus service. The San
written. It is anticipated that the ramps will be J° aquin Kegional Transit District ( SJR"T'D) videned, and traffic signals will be installed in the
operates the bus routes while r ltamont
future.

Commuter F.,xpress operates the commuter rail
service. These transit services are described in
Interstate 205 lies to the south of the City of detail below.

Lathrop and provides a connection to the City of
Tracy and the San Francisco Bay Area.

SJI TD I'i ed-Koute Seruice
The SJRZ operates two fixed-route bus lines
State Route 120 is another majox regional RouCe 290 and 97) that serve the City of roadway in San Joaquin Countt and provides a
I.athrop. Route 97 connects Manteca Transit
connection from I-5 and I-205 to State Route 99, Center to" lracy Transit Center through Lathrop south and east of the Plan rea. SR 120 vill serve via Louise I venue and Interstate 5. Route as a
likely access route for trips accessing the 97. Route 90 connects I.athrop to Stockton and Plan rea from I lanteca. The I-S/ SR 120 Tracy via lnterstate 5. The route map for Route interchange located South of the Plan r rea 90 and 97 are sho vn on Figure 3. 2. These routes provides a connection between these two include several esisting bus stops within roadways through a
sy stem of ramps. I,athrop' s City limits. An additional proposed bus stop is suggested at I lanthe Road just south of
State Route 99 is a regional roadway in the De Lima Road to serve commuters to the CLSPregional area. This roadway serves as one of the 2 area. This suggested stops are shown on Figure major north- south routes in San Joaquin CountZ% 3. 4.
and provides a connection between the City of
Stockton in the noYth and Manteca in the south. SJRTD Flexzble Fixed- Roaste Seroic• e SR 99 continues south through Stanislaus SJRTD also operates Route 90, which is a flexible County and parallels I- 5 throughout much of fi ed-route line. r flexible fi ed- route bus California. operation follows a general route but can deviate within limited areas to pick- up or drop- off
Exi.rting Bicycle and Pecle. ct ian Netzvork
passengers. This line links the Ciry of Lathrop
Yagc 3- Z
Central I,athrop Specific Plan— Yhasc 2 Amendment Chapter"Three: Circularioa and' Ccansportation with Stockton and Tracy via a route that provides
access into the City of Lathrop by Lathrop Road
and Louise Avenue.

SJKTD Commuter Bu.r Service
The SJRTD operates a number of commuter bus
lines vhich connect cities in San Joaquin County
with major employment locations in the San
Francisco Bay rea including Pleasanton,
Dublin, Livermore, l 7ountain View, Palo 1 lto,
and Sunnyvale. The e isting Commuter Bus
service in Lathrop connects Lathrop to the
Dublin/ Pleasanton I3AR"T station and also
Sunnyvale. Cotnmuters access the bus service at
the Lathrop Park and Ride Lot south of the Plan
rea, vhich is located between Lathrop Road
and Louise venue on Sth Street.

Altcrmont Commuter Eh re s Rcril Setvice ( ACE) '
I ulley-Link
lltamont Commuter Express Rail Ser- ice
ltamont Commuter f: xpress ( ACE) is a
passenger rail service connecting Stockton to
San Jose. The closest ACE station to the Plan
rlrea is located on the border of the Ciry of
Lathrop and the Ciry of 1 lanteca to the north of
SR 120.

Valley Link is a new 42 - mile, 7- station
passenger rail project connecting BART' s rapid
transit system in the Bay Area' s' I'ri-Valley and
the CE Commuter. Fhpress ( RCE). Future
Valley Link/ ACE Stations are anticipated at two
locations within City limits. One proposed
location neaY the River Islands development
North of Iighway 5 along the Union PaciFic
Railroad. t1 second location is proposed in
North Lathrop at Lathrop Road along the
Union Pacific Railroad and I fcI inley Avenue.

Existing Trlrc•k Rorrte.r
Existing truck routes within the vicinin- of the
Plan Area, including ST A truck routes and nonSTr1A truck routes are shown on Figure 3. 3.

Yagc 3- 3
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Thxee: Circularion and' I'ransportation Figure 3. 1- Existing Circulation Plan
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECTFIC Pt AN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
r ' ;
i
vy, si l , . f ; .. .
u -, .
z -
w. ROTH ROAD
r v - 4. az; s,, r'+utM Miea
o-, u ,, .. , r,. '
s. a
4,
s
w 3`,' p it i
y4r",.,' y
zi r;'..y z r ,- . . .
i i
s i ri% ;,, ,
1 r , x`s 1
e iy;-,
r ,
s:
a a
i-,i m„
w'', , " .
t . Y,.` x.
p
3 Y f
f x
n ""
s,`%fi.
t s r.j"` x '
a
z` r:
t
tLSR2 AMEND,' ENT
F`,, PLAN AREA
x. g
r w iw ww N rn 1 w4
d% ,
t " d'..

W' e'.
j 3 a`, .
zw
DE IIMA ROAD a
rq
S
DOS REIS R AQ c
ri`ii+ t" i''. Y.. r r rr m'wri w iriSi GiGw iii r rii iiu i r, Z ijx rl,::
t
L 1 '- ' t r
e? q
a
s
r
x. r.' SPARTANa.$
a::.. aa.. aa;:: s", Z LATHROP ROAD
YVAY ;
nw ,.
r
a;,.`
m'
as+"''
o` '' i'J.,9
a v y,
r ,`„
y
a' C',
pp y, a N
r•'
r J`f, , Q . 2€, as w
QQ w'. w. x.
5r
xt ` a s ' se "
a .. a
LEGEND
r r a r Existing Roads
CLSR: Anx ndment Plan. Arw
Fi ure 3. 1
T~
N. TS. EXISTING CIRCULATION PLAN
Central Lathrop Speci c Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
A5
Lathrop, Ca

Page 3 ends

Centcal Lathcop Speciflc Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter' I'hree: Cicculation and" I'ranspoctaCion Figure 3. 2- Existing Bus Service Plan
CENTRAL LATHROP SPEC1FtC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
v
h ti<
Esp- z amEr mErv1'''```,,,
PLAN AREA a %¢" ,. , ;
r r ar r r rw r r • e. r r r c :
4 v
C t x,;
z
p) ;
z
DE LIMA ROAD f
c.`i
E,>
P e
o OS REi5 ROAD
j
r wrnw w r crrr r
G
4 d '
w,, , w SF ARTAN' LATHROP R AD
WAY y,
1 r^
y , g
9', a* Q" '' a'`
f,,,
ass, 4
q' y„ r
a'
y
k ^,,,.
q
a. y .. , 3,,
p'
a . a z
2' . 6 4"
s.¢
a , a 7 , . n"
a ,
r d `' . ` r 2
i :/ r, , f a
az
4,, w,' s . , a, a
v Y r'
a^^,#, M a w. ,,
n
e i. d ',"
7 k. ic ` ,„
RIVER ISlANC15 PKWYm
a .

OUISEAVEPiUE '
s
N, a
s„ k <
f
r x, z
r
b . ' 4;..-. ;`
GEuo
rurx wr Exixting Rpute 90,V7 Bi s Lina
CI.. SF'-? Amencimen[ Ptan Area
Fi ure 3. 2
NORTw
y s EXISTING BUS SERVICE PLAN
Y Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
r
Yage 3- 5
Central l,athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter" 1hree: Circularion and Transportation Figure 3. 3- Existing Truck Route Plan
CENTRAL LATNROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
p
A .
w,
ClSP- 2AMENpMENT
PLAN AftEA r ..

P ,
ririrr rr . wr rr wi aa f' ti '
Ca`
ct' v
t ,
CC'- i
r tE4 ,
W".,s gp r
R'
DE I IMA ROAD i„-s'.
q'
y
O ROS REIS ROAD k
Y l
s. rr r rrrr rr,,
G. .. 1.:
y +" A° G. ,
SPqRTAN s LQTHROP ROAp
WAY
t'",
a fi `^ T v
p,, a
i%.:,,-
SSi , Q m
2 a
t
t.7 s Ax M r ` ' ""
c v 3 a , A
x '" ' „
k,'x
N
y
19 z; ' t ` t t'%" ' m C a y" fi' q
y ," "` . ' h
rrti a s
s ro, aaw wwM.. rwr. r. w. wrr rw rirrtrrr r wirs. r,rw., RIVER ISLAhl} 5 PKWY ; , LOUISEAVENUE
a
a
nx t " e
a. ,- ,
3 1
x ir
m`. a ,
i,. a. a
LEGEND
w.. s ExiSdngTruCkRmrte
r+r+ i+ Exis[ ing STAA. Rou e
CLSP• 2 A ment Plan: 1rta
FiQ re 3. 3
N D N T N v
T. S EXISTING TRUCK ROUTE PLAN
Y Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
s..

I' age 3- 6
Central l, athxop Specific Plan— i' hase 2 Amendment Chapter' I'hrce: Circulation and' 1' cansportation Proposed Transportation Improvements CLSP-2 Amendment Plan Area With the anricipated growth in the City of
Transportation Network
Lathrop and San Joaquin County, both The CLSP- 2 Amendment outlines a welljurisdictions have identified transportation structured network of roadways, bikeways and improvement projects in the CLSP-? walk vays to serve the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan mendment Plan rea and the regional area rea. The circulation system will provide along with various funding sources. convenient and safe access to all areas within the Plan Area, as illustrated in Figure 3. 4, Vehicular
City of t iro Circulation Plan. r well- connected hierarchy of The 2022 General Plan and the various Lathrop travel modes will provide for the efficient flo v of speciFic plans identifv near- term and long-term
vehicular traffic, but also encourage and facilitate
transportation improvements. T' he Citv of Walking, biking, public transit, and other Lathrop Traffic Monitoring ProgYam ( TMP) alternatives to single- occupancy vehicles. helps to identify vhen the near- term projects are
The CLSP- 2 Amendment includes connections
required to be constructed based on a level of
to the off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths
services analysis. Local funding sources for select
thin the CLSP Phase 1 Plan rea. Class I (offtransportation improvements include the City- of street) bike routes along Golden Valle}' Parkway
Lathrop Capital Facilities Fee ( CFF Program.
are proposed to be extended into the CLSP- 2
Fees collected through the CFF Program can be
menclment Plan rlrea and transition into Class
used to fund or reimburse the construction of
II bike lanes throughout the local industrial
ne v and improved roadways such as:
streets. Class I( off- street) and Class II( on- street) bike routes along Stanford Crossing are
Golden Valley Parl vay
p oposed to be e tended into the CI,SP- 2
lmendment Plan r1rea. To encourage pedestrian
Lathrop Road/ I- 5 interchange
trips within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan r rea
and to surrounding areas, all arterial and local
Louise venue/ I- 5 interchange
streets include sidewalks.

Roth Road/ I- 5 interchange
The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared with the
2022 C' eneral Plan rovides the basis for the
Regional Tran.rportatiorz Plan( R7P)
number of lanes required based on a level of
San Joac uin County-, through the San Joac uin services analpsis.

Council of Governments ( SJCOG), periodicall
updates the Regional Transportation Plan, which Boadavays outlines countytivide transportarion espenditures
The CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan 11rea includes
based on funding from sources such as the
several ne v roadways within an interconnected
Federal Goti ernment, the State of California, and
road vay system. These new roadway s, along with
locally collected funds. These funds ty ically are
provements to existing roadways, provide the
allocated to mainline freeway improvements in
necessary access for the Plan 1 rea. The road vay
the region. network is sho vn on the Vehicular Circulation Mec. ratre K
Plan ( Figure 3. 4), while the locations oE each
individual street secuon aYe identified on the
I' Ieasure K sales tas funds additional roadway Street Sections I ey Map ( Figure 3. 5). improvements. The Measure K Strategic Plan
provides for the expenditure of these funds.

Page 3 ends

Centrall, athrop Specific I' lan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter" I' hme: Circulation and' 1' ransportation The proposed CLSP- 2 Amendment road vay the arterial system. Collector roadways also system is based on a
pattern of streets that provide direct access to parcels. Collector provides safe and efficient access for vehicles, roadway s can be classified as both major bicycles and pedestrians. The roadway sy-stem collectors and minor collectors. Collectors in the includes an extension of Golden Valley Park vay Plan Area generally have two lanes with a center and Stanford Crossing, widening of Dos Reis turn lane/ median, though additional lanes may Road, De Lima Road, and Manthey Road, and be provided at intersections to provide sufficient the construction of several new local industrial intersection capacity. roads consistent with the 2022 Lathrop General
Plan. The addition of traffic signals may be Local Boad.r— Local roads provide direct access to required at various intersections as determined parcels and connect to collectors. Traffic for future specific project developments in the volumes on these roads are lo v and through CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan r rea. traffic is discouraged.

Generally, die proposed Phasing and Capital CLSP-2Amendment Plan Area Ttuck Impro- ement Program will fund and construct Routes
full roadway improvements curb- to- curb and
required street lighting for roadways from The 2022 General Plan rohibits Golden Valley intersection to intersection as specific Parkway and Dos Reis Road within the CLSP- 2 development proposals in the CLSP- 2 mendment Plan Area from being designated as Amendment I' lan Area trigger the need for these truck routes. Manthey Road is the designated roadway segment unprovements. The approach truck route connecting the CLSP- 2 rlmendment to and the timing of roadway improvements
Plan 1rea to the Roth Road interchange north of
should be logical and comptehcnsive as to
e CLSP- 2 r mendment Plan Area. In addition,
accommodate development phases and
the local industrial streets vithin the CLSP- 2
demands, vhile avoiciing piecemeal mendment Plan Area are proposed to be improvements within the CLSP- 2 c mendment
designated as truck routes as illustrated in Figure
Plan Area. 3. 11. Truck access is prohibited on Dos Reis Road and I fanthey Road south of Dos Reis.

Functional classification systems divide roadways Refer to the Lathrop l lunicipal Code Chapter into a hierarchv based on their abilitt to serve

10. 16 Truck Routes and Commercial Vehicles
traffic and provide access to development. for details regarciing designated truck routes. irterial— These roadways are intended to serve
as the major routes of travel. rterials are
designed to link facilities such as free vay s and
eapressways ( which prioritize the movement of
through vehicles) with lower hierarchy roadways,
vhich provide direct access to parcels. rlrterials
can provide some level of ciirect access with
limitations. These limitations can include
restrictions on spacing and turn mo- ements into
and out of driveway locations. clrterials can also
seroe as bicycle and pedestrian routes.

Collecto-— These roadways serve as intermediate
links between arterials and local roads. Traffic is
collected from local roads and distributed onto
Ya; c 3- 8
Central Lathrop Specifie Plan- Phase 2 i mendment Chapter Three: Circularion and" I'ransportation Figure 3. 4- Vehicular Circulation Plan
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIF[ C PLAN PHASE 2 AME?vD1 1EtV`T
a h
E " TO ftOTH ROAD :"

STREET A
r a. r r r, w+ r ws ai w ww
m
i Qr
t- C l-,+y`
1 I I u".r
a„ R
I I I
r' I
I I I 2r
DE LIMf RQAD POT NT A.
os sraP
i STR T R f.. r '; LOCATI h
r —
i I , E i
i i
I
I 1 I [
705 R IS RdAD
EX 1ANTNEY RO D
t r r rrrr n r r
SOl1TH F D03
co cr To EXrsrrr
v1 REIS AND NORTN
GpCp€ N VALL6Y PARKWAY
f F SPARTAN WAY

CONNEGT TO EXISTING
3' TO BE ABA.NDONED,
sTar Faaa Caossz c
J` 5PARTAN WAY 2
yC' a•••+,• t tATHR!? P ROAD
p.

D
rr MX
M' GC a r'
x ;, O 1,.. a
O 3-
a" "
a, 5:
ae:.,,_. .. ..
1_ LG£ Nll
Artcri:+ l N' ilhuu[ 1' ruck, 4cctys
a uMIM1 Collcetor 1` ithout Truuk Ac ess
IIO rlll Cullector Without Tmck Access 4. C) ptionul)
apt Collector With Truck Acces.

Local Industcial Strcet
I1 I 11 111 Lcxal Industria] Strcet((} ptinnal)
Levea Access Road
Pra}rosc! Ruuncla6uut
w w r CLSP• 2 Amendment Plan Area Roundary
@xisting Road
Potrntial i'ropox cl Bus Slop L xatian if neetled
Figure 3. 4

N O R T H

VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca

Page 3 ends

Central Lathrop Specific Plan— I'hase 2 Amettdment Chapter" Three: Circularion and Transportation Figure 3. S- Street Sections Key Map
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
t

9. 0 ,.,; ,. , .; :, <„ „ ; ,,,. ,.,,.°,,, ri r+s ',
S
x
s'
p
r
1 t
u
i;
F
t x r
f ,
z !?
NY, p,j" .
s < i
3" r w
k , ,.
r ,
z"
W
fr :. i
s
ti
r
y
vf^ x
e r e
LWr„ t' g
3 / i`,, :

I
k,.
q
di,'

STREET A
s rrrrrrwri E. a.. ..
m
V
W W.

T,
M
F
t ..C
LIMA ROAD ;
s--
1, e ' i
O 1 _ ': STREET D
r
y ,.
i "; , .
r
m,. m
1--- 4''
Qt 1 DOS REIS ROAD
rrw, t
r rr r w ......... a ..

F
f
i N i f 7
9Y
A
9/,/'' ,' 7
f . r[ M u "
9 SPRRTRN WRY ti , A " v%,";
e a <'" O
riry rr` s 9 sF d.!"
r r' , y,,
J'
r' iF
y h " y`,
e
z
r:
i
s 2 i
e° x w ,, .
tN f . g y.`$
a3,
eu... e.,". .. , ,.r
Figure 3. 5

N D N T M
N. T. S. STREET SECTIONS KEY MAP
Central Lathrap Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
d1°"
Lathrop, Ca
k...

Page 3 ends

Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter I'hrce: Circulation and" 1' ransportation Figure 3. 6- Street Sections
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
W44
ommcmmt cK CeGmnrrccJ
x,.,, a,
b1Exe. t 1, J
M •
d• •
1! • a tl
f
n •
s
a
O° D Ip° o, ' yb +
D 6 ad°
Cortimuain Wali
u1wig RxFl.3eni'rai
Land u4cv
I
11u1[ i- usc Pztn
hinitiu5< Pa1A
b' %' Ei' N' I" 17 16' I?' A i l' %' ! S' &' 7
w PuGh US 7' cuvcl Trevei ! idien 7ruvrt Tru.• ai 4`S PaM L. ti ix ta M t.xnr L;uir
R[ penSRuv 2Tlhitiry` 25' t4iliie Curridur
C' mr ar
RiW' Il?`
7 Sg R.\ b'
t Lnnc wWih widens I ET rw; ar a Rcis Rosd
A , QLDEN VALI. EY PARKGVAY LATHROR v.rs.RD Tt I) OS REIS RD - t25' ROW South
Communiry Psrk Y{ ig6 Schoob' RhtU
TicMh
Limitrd Oidustrial `
b
L A b" 40
b
b
b
60 Q 6b
ti„;- u v:; n
Nuhi- u.sc Pa: h
16' B' b' A' i l' 1 1' 8' b' 8' tiP
t.: 5 4ath 1 3 UiFe 7' ru cl Tre. rol / i 4e I_$ Pnth I; S ane Lanc I., m Lanr
30' Pedes[ nanlUtilily Cmrichx 2K' 24' Ctilfty Cun'Idvr R;.W
v2'
w,
g
S REIS ROAD STANFORD CROSSING TO GOLDEN VALLEY PKWY - 92' ROW n, s.

Fi ure 3. 6
Ts STREET SECTIONS
Y Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
a - W.- . a
Pagc 3- 11
Central Latheop Speciflc Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter I'hrce: Circulation and' 1' ransportation Figure 3. 7- Street Sections
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 ANIENDMENT
wa
orr c« m i
Nonh
Limtted Indusinal
a • o
C'},°
o'°
6° ° bb
Srmct vcca ut Imak
in watcr qu: lity
Mul1i- usa Fad
Mnid- usc Poch f'
t'a! L'e
i0' N' u 1iri S' 12' 12' 32' R' ualtt 8' 10'
L. S Path 8ikt I'rn ei Ccntcr T'ruvul Bikr & Pnth L+S
LIS' Luue t,xine Tum Lune Lauc Lnne Lt5'
2[' Utiliry Corritkr 5;.' 2R UtHip C'onida
R; W
I( YY
N;
DOS RETS ROAD( GOLDEN VALLEY PKWY TO MANTHEY ROAD}- IU4' ROW Y T. S
A reduction in torm wafer yuality trcaunam can be u pG d per Seciiws 1. 5 nf ihe Mutii- Agency Poso-Cinstmwion SloonwaicrSt; uulurds Munuul W'es
IJmitcYi Indusviul
r_
a • y
e
i uF„ mc irea, bN s
e a + ` p . v
QGA QGD d
IUiil- usc 1 a1M
EiP 23' Ei' ri' 12' I Z' ! P H' '
LeS Patli L S' Bikc Travcl l'enarr Trave] Bikc L.'S'
L+n e L: uit Tum Lane Lane L'anc
26' Utitity Corridur 9+'
Rw R w
MANTHEY ROAD bOS RFIS ROA[ TO STREET' A' - 5' ROW'
w. T. S
Gxcmp fro+n> tcrnn wuter qualitp trcuimcnt prr Szctioa 1. 5 uPthe A1ulti- Agency Pc,cbfonstrtictimi Stormwatcr Smndards Manusl Fi ure 3. 7

N Q R T M

Y S STREET SECTIONS
Y Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
Pagc 3- 12
CenCral l.athrop Spccific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendment Chapter Thxcc: CircuLition and' 1' ransportation Figure 3. 8- Street Sections
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
C,
4 a t
a
t
I, im tutl tdaetriul q
d 7 Q 6b t. imicedlnduptrial
Opcm S ucc on Strcet B
SCrce trrca ai beouk>
in wntcr qnulity
t0' 4' $' 6' l2' I'' 1? G 8' S' 1tY
p h Water A kc Travel ' entrr' fut Tra e Bi. utar ' W P4fP.

QuaHty Laoc Lana Lane Lanc Lane Qualicy
L5• L. S'
R+W R,.

E L#GHT iNDUSTRiAL- N. T.S. 74' R W
A rai wtion in sionxi.. utcr quniiip irW unenc can bz a+ licd per Sccnai LS of thc hiulli-. 9gency Post- Consiruc ion S ormwatcr Staixlsrds Afanual d
4• a A A b
da Q4 oJf yo
b
LI J
H+ Euat
Lianited Industrlal
sarer recs at hreaks
Limiied Intluatrial
m uoirr qiwFny
Q' S' R' 6' I Z' 1'_' I Z' 6' K' S' U]'
LJS Sr Y=ucr iike ' imvel ' furn Travel t3ika «` a« S`' PL G Bul7ct Q Y Lanc Lntte Lane Lnnc L<'nx ualiry
L`S' LSR
31' Utilily Cbrridur
It4'
R'\ 4' Rr1V
E( X P. L
IGHT 1NDUSTRIAL- 84' ROW
Tti
A reduction in xronn wuter qualitV' irevtment ca t be applied r Sea: tiun LS oftha Multi- A ency P ast- C` onsiruciiviz Stormwuter Sinntturda Manual Figure 3. 8
NOATM
N. T. S STREET SECTIONS
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
A ,,- t,-: -..

A;`<.

Page 3 ends

Central Lathrop Spccific Plan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chapter Thrce: Circulation and' 1' zansportation Figure 3. 9- Street Sections
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
tl
4 a
d
yb
4° c? 6°°` y° u h
Limited( ndutitr(ai
Sbcpe treen at hrcakc
n nvvcr qualiry
r 8' 6' 12' t 2' 3 2' 4' S' S' i U'
N'e' ike Tr.jvcl Twta Tn vel Bike ' S' k PUG
puakit' Gvie Lsiw Laac La n La ie Qtrdlitq
3cLS LS
R; W
by
R.ryY
Ni Utilitica
nI,.TGEiT 1NDUSTRI L- 69' ROW V
N. T.S.

Figure 3. 9
N O p T N
N.T.S. STREET SECTIONS
Central Lathrap Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
A; r,.

I' agc 3- 74
Central], athrop Specific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter Thcee:(: irculation and T' xansportatioc Utility Corridors Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
As shown on the CLSP- 2 rlmendment Roadway The CLSP- 2 mendment Plan r rea provides a Vehicular Circulation Network and street comprehensive and extensive sy stem of sections, many of the streets within the CLSP- 2 integrated bicycle and pedestrian paths and Amendment Plan Area include utility corridors sidewalks. This system connects residential within the public right- of-way. The purpose of neighborhoods, public facilities, open spaces, utility- corridors is to provide a location for the and commercial areas w-ith the limited industrial installation of joint trench utilities ( power, gas, use. Major elements of this network include both telephone, cable T.V. and other sunilar dry off-street and on- street facilities. Refer to Figure urilities). 3. 10 foY the Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan. Improvements such as dri- eways shall be
The mainline joint trench vill be installed designed to maintain a safe environment for beneath the mulu- use path or sidewalk.' I'he area pedestrians and birycles and to avoid conflicts wid between the curb and the multi- use path/ truck traffic. sidewalk is envisioned to be used for the
placement of underground vaults and structures I'he off-street facilities include eight- foot- wide such as splice boxes, transformers and other paved multi- use paths located adjacent to sunilar equipment. In instances where these arterials and some of the collector roadway s. A structures cannot be constructed underground, multi- use trail adjacent to the San Joaquin River thc portion of the utility corridor located behind levee if approved by the Cit- of Lathrop and the multi- use path/ side vall to the right of way Reclamation District- 17. Other off-street line is envisioned to be used for above ground facilities include dedicated sidewalks. cabinets, where they can be placed away from the
travel waj- and vhere landscaping can be used for
visual screening. If there is not adequate space
for above ground cabinets in the utility corridor
behind the multi-use trail/ sidewalk, then a public
utility easement may be added for this purpose.

Utilities that are typically owned and maintained
by the City ( such as sewer, water, recycled water
and drainage s stems) are intended to be placed
undcr the paved roadwa sections. F owever, in
some instances, Che City Engineer may appxove
the use of utility corridors for the placement of
these utilities. This situation might occur if there
is not adequate room to meet separation
requirements between the utilities within the
paved section. It may- also occur if phasing of
construction requires early placement of
pipelines ( before road vay improvements) and
the risk of subsequent damage to the pipeline
during road construction justifies.

Yagc 3- 15
Central I,athtop Specific I' lan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter' I'hme: Circularion and' 1'ransportation Figure 3. 10- Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
3 r ':,,
s r,
w
y ar
a i i
v
3 y fV6Fa,,.. k." {') /, 1 l„p t
y
r, M., , , ,
y Y
i, iN"
e.
7' ',
2 xiw§.

STREET A
rr rurirr+r r rr. w w r w s w s# -'",,
q b
a W
U r
w
a u' y ;.

Z x
i `
n
I N Z r

DE LIMA RQAD '

STREET D
1, I
Qc. y, , y,: '
os REis a;a v
i JrWr r1 IfO PI ar ii wiY r s w w
lI f" .

CONNECT TO EXISTING—
60LD N VAIIEY PARKWAY
GONNECT T4 EXISTING
STANFORR GROS3ING SPARTAIV WAY LATHRt? P ROAD
y°, -;`!`.,, s,
1' c v
Q q
2G` a
d s
s t3
a r
Y
A , ,
w, r'
L6GEYD
E i/! vtulti- UseTrailwithinPark' Openspacc
Multi- Use Pat6 w ithin Public Right-0f=N+uy( No f3ikc Lmw) N Mu(ti-Use Pat6 und Bikc C. anc
Sidewalk sm! Bike Lazie
CLSP- 2 Amrndmnit Plan Arca Eiuundary
0 ' p
Wes
Pau1 C
ParrrOpenspace O San Joaquin River
Suect B
Meemk, nng 12' ulti- urc" Praik
along Ipp oF s4c gc benn
u. Ti- usF rx,au.. oc,aTron
N. T.S. Figure 3. 10
N O F7 T N

PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE
y T s. CIRCULATIQN PLAN
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
51"""`
Lathrop, Ca

Page 3 ends

Central], athzop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendment Chaptcr Three: Ciccularion and" 1' ransportation Figure 3. 11- Proposed Truck Route Plan
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFiC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
n{ '"{ "
yq . .. F+ vah. J . '
a.
s " 7
f
tLSP-2AlUlENEkM6NT
PLAN AREA i 1 eo1K Raav rs
INT6ACHAtX3E ,` X s
a
z J
O
4 t " y 2r '
q
dE LIMA ROAD c .

END TRUCK AOUTE
2 AT OQS AE25 NOAD t
EHD S1AA RE7171
o, DQS REIS ROAd
1 nr oos e ts a0ab
F i
r r/ irr rr , f '. .
pG M4 TRUCK ACGESS ON DOS REIS^—'—""' tl ELI1dIPtATE TRUGK ROUTE NQAD OR C,d1. DEM YALLEY PKWY i
p
G
l'
a : , SPARTAN ATHROP ROAtI
WAY a r p
s+
u z r
as2 Q 3. N
r,
s
p
s
x a,
a'
w ,' CY
k r
c/f g '. ,,'
s , jhn^ f
ik
y
z i a .
b . '.,' w" , R
v
ri m''
m
7 y, g
3, w
R
t R i E', k r,A
w o >
a 3
y, R F h tiF X
u
sy. ,, ,
A
m a Nrw.ws M s'+ rrarrrra wrfr rrrYirr^' s lrwrwirrea s.

RIVER ISCAN} S PKWY , LOUISEAVENUE
n $ „
s, 1 s 1 , w, f 4"
q .
k 1 .
v ma
rt
y y1' 1
4 4 k X T { jg ' J v^" 4°'
h
G, k ' N `"
v.. rz, a 4• i',
9 g. , F .

LEtiENp
Propc s d Truck Rome
sr. rnr ExiatingTnrckRoutc
Proposad ST. 4A Route
w r F.acistingSl" AARoutc
C[. SP• 2 Am47idmcN Plun Arca Figure 3. 11

N O N T N
N.T. S. pR4P0 SED TRUCK ROUTE PLAN
a Y s Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
a.

Page 3 ends

Central], athrop Speciflc Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Four: Natural Resources i lanagement Chapter Four: Natural Resources Management
Intt'oductioti vegetation and habitat will be preserved and protected, except as determined by RD- 17 for
This chapter addresses the natural resource levee safety or maintenance reasons. Public opportuniues of the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan
access to and along the top of the levee may be
Area and ho v
they are integrated and managed provided if approved by the City of Lathrop and for their preservation and benefit of the
17, affording the community views of the
community. Additionally>, this chapter identifies river and its environs, as well as greater views of and discusses how other facilities may be
the valley.
integrated into the CLSP- 2 to provide for the
pro Tision of ne v natural resource systems. 3 linear park also provides open space area within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. The
Open Space and Parks lineal park offers opportunities for passive The CLSP-? Amendment makes estensive use of activities and contributes to vards community dedicated open space to create an integrated and identity. The park espands upon Dos Reis Park. interconnected resource management system.

The preservation and management of existing
Kefer to Chapter Five: Community Services and
natural resources within and adjacent to the
Facilities for more information on parks.

CLSP Plan Area and the establishment of new
illiamsonActLands
natural resource systems are a principal feature of
the CLSP- 2. Open space can be both privately No parcels within CLSP- 2 are under Y/illiamson owned and maintained or publicly o vned and rlct contracts. Parcels that were previously under maintained. The Open Space and Parks contract at the time the 200 CLSP was prepared proposed as a
part of this specific plan are filed Notices of Non- Renewal and are no longer continuation of the efforts begun with the under the contracts. original CLSP to expand open space and park
s stems within Ciry limits. Rtght to Fatm
Open Space features include the San Joaquin The City ofI..athrop has adopted an Agricultural River and those areas associated with the levee- Land Preservation Ordinance, also known as a its side slopes, its top, and the area within close
right to farm" ordinance, to protect the
pro: imiry of the outer( land side) levee toe; open
acti ities, operations, and facilities associated
space corridors that may contain linear detention with agricultural production from encroaching basins; and other areas where either natural urban uses and conflict. The CLSP EIR identiFies resources or community design warrants an open
ation to alleviate potential impacts of
space use. Open space areas are typically
development within the CLSP- 2 l mendment
characterized bv the inclusion of internal trail Plan rlrea upon functioning agricultural systems.
activities. I itigation is comprised of setback
buffers between development and farming
With the establishment of the linear open space
activities.
corridor along the river, sensitive riparian
Yagc 4- 1
Central]. athiop Specific Plan— Phase 2 lmendment Chapter F our: Natural Resoucces blanagemcnt To reduce potential public pressure to restrict clumps of shrubs have been observed. Based on agricultural operations that future residents may the presence of blue elderberry shrubs, valley consider a nuisance, the City requires that a elderberry longhorn beetle could occur in the disclosure statement be provided to new CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. homebuyers notify ing them of preexisting
agricultural land uses within the surrounding
Several special status raptor species are expected
area.
to occur in the CLSP- 2 area, including
Swainson' s hawk, white- tailed kite, and northern
Biologieal Resources harrier. Agricultural fields provide suitable foraging habitats for all of these special- status
The CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area is comprised
raptors and the oak and riparian forest
mosdy of intensively managed and irrigated
communities provide nesting opportunities for
agricultural fields with a few large lot
tree nesting species.
homesteads. l s a result, natural habitats within
the CLSP- 2 r mendment Plan Area are restricted Riparian brush Yabbits have been located in the to narro v
patches of riparian vegetation along CLSP- 2 l mendment Plan Area. lthough the San Joaquin River, marsh vegetation in some riparian brush rabbits occur in the CLSP- 2 agricultural ditches, and scattered indicidual or mendment Plan rlrea, the small patches of small clumps of valley oak trees. suitable habitat are unlikely to support a longterm viable popularion of the species.

The CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area vegetation is
dominated by cropland and other developed or The predominance of agricultural lands limits the previously disturbed habitats. 1 relatively small overall wildlife habitat value of the CI,SP- 2 amount of native egetation occurs along the San Amendment Plan r tea and supports a relarively Joaquin River, vhich borders the western edge of low diversit of wildlife species. Ho vever, some the CLSP- 2 area, and within several of the species heavily utilize agricultural fields. Alfalfa drainage ditches that traverse the area. fields in the CI,SP- 2 mendment Plan Axea are Vegetation types present in the CLSP- 2
eapected to support small mammals, such as
mendment Plan Area are classified according to Botta' s pocket gopher, vestern harvest mouse, the categories designated in the SJl 1SCP. The and California meadow ole. These small CLSP FIR describes these categories. Present mammals are prey for a variery of raptor species vegetation categories are cropland, Ereshwater known to occur in the CLSP- 2 area, including emergent wetland, Great Valley cottonwood American kestrel, northern harrier, red-- tailed riparian forest, Great Valley- oak riparian forest, hawk, and Swainson' s hawk. r variety of other Great Vallcy riparian scrub, ruderal, and park/ birds were observed or are etpected to forage in residential. CI,SP- 2 mendment Plan r rea agricultural
fields, including vestern kingbird, barn swallo v,
Some habitat types in the CLSP- 2 area could be vestern meado vlark, and Bre ver' s blackbird. considered sensitive by regulatory agencies.

These include freshwater emergent wetland, Ornamental vegetation and landscaping Great `' alle- cottonwood riparian forest, and associated with developed areas, such as rural Great ValleS riparian scrub. residences and the County park, also suppoYt a relati- ely lo v wildlife diversity-. These areas are
Valley elderberry longhorn beetles require blue
pically utilized by species adapted to highly
elderberry shrubs for reproduction and sun ival. sturbed and altered environments, such as Although focused surveys for elderberry shrubs
house sparrow, house finch, raccoon, and
opossum.
have not been conducted, isolated shrubs and
Yagc 1- 2
Centrall. athrop Specific Plan— 1' hase 2 Amendment Chaptec F our: Natucal Resources blan gement Y ildlife diversity in agricultural ditches is limited economy, and allow development vithin the due to the regular disturbance of the ditches for Counry. With the adoption of the SJMSCP, U. S. clearing and maintenance and the absence of Fish and `' ildlife Service and the California natural vegetation in uplands adjacent to the Department of Fish and Game ( now kno vn as ditches ( e. g., agricultural lands). However, d1e the Department of Fish & x'ildlife) issued marsh vegetation in the ditches may support incidental take permits ( ITPs). The IZZ' s species ty pical of this plant community such as authorized the incidental take of federa113 listed marsh wren, song sparrow, and Pacific tree frog. and state- listed threatened and endangered Riparian vegetation and oak trees provide nesring species and their habitats for a peYiod of 50 years habitat for a much wider variet of bird species in exchange for participating project applicants and also provide potential nest sites for raptors. paying mitigation Eees. Fees are based on the amount and rype of land converted from
The CLSP EIR contains a detailed descriprion of agricultural or open space uses to urban uses. sensitive habitats and vildlife, potential impacts
and mitigation measures to alleviate development Ninety- se ren species are covered by the effects upon these resources. SJMSCP, which is intended to provide comprehensive mitigation pursuant to local,
CLSP- 2 Plan Amendment designates some state, and federal regulations for impacts on these natural habitats as Open Space within the CLSP- species from SJMSCP- permitted activities. 2 . mendment Plan Area to assure their
preservation. These habitats are located primarily Focused surveys for special- status species were along the San Joaquin River and vill be not conducted for this project. Reconnaissance integrated into the CLSP levee open space areas, level surve}' s were conducted that included a river areas, and adjacent linear community park. habitat evaluation for all potentially occurring The preservation of the levee open space special- status species. Development of the corridor and parallel linear community park CLSP- 2 mendment Plan rea is covered under forms and continues a
strong framework of the SJI ZSCP, with comprehensive habitat continuous open space within and beyond the evaluations and focused survey s, when necessary, CLSP- 2 area, maintains an interconnected to be conducted for covered special- status habitat system that allows for the connectiviry of species in accordance vith the SJMSCP prior to plant and vildlife communities, and support daily ground disturbance. vildlife needs, while permitting limited public
access to these areas. Public access along die Impacts to fishery- and wetland resources that potential levee top txail will permit scenic views ght occur in the CLSP- 2 tlmendment Plan from and access along the levee and to certain Area that are not coveYed under the SJMSCP open space areas, this will protect sensitive program must be permitted separately. Such habitats and vildlife from effects associated with permits may include authorizaaon of dredge or human interaction. fill of wetlands under Secrion 404 of the Clean Water Act and Incidental Take uthorization
Habitat Conservation Plarl under Section 7 or Section 10 of the federal Endangered Species r1ct.

The City of Lathxop adopted the San Joaquin
Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Historic and Cultural Resources Space Plan ( SJMSCP) on January 16, 2001, and
signed the implementation agreement. The Based on a series of archaeological and historical SJMSCP provides a
process for plan participants resource sur- ey s and records searches performed to offset impacts to biological resources, for the project, no archaeological sites have been conserve open space, maintain the agricultural idenrified within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Pagc 4- 3
CenCral I. azhrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chapter F our: Naturai Resources i fanagcmcnt Area, nor would construction of the project
affect any known prehistoric archaeological site.

The CLSP EIR provides mitigation and direction
for further analysis of project related impacts on
historical and cultural resources, as needed, and
on how to proceed if any previously*
undiscovered or sub- surface archaeological
artifacts or historical sites are discovered in the
Plan Area. Refer to the CLSP EIR for additional
information.

Pa}; c 4-- 1
Central l,athrop Speciflc Plan— Ph se 2,\ meudmcnt Chaptcr 1 ivc CommLmity Serviccs and f acilities Chapter Five: Community Services and Facilities
Itttt'oductiott Open Space, I.evee and River areas provide significant recreational, risual and aesthetic
A wide array- of public services and facilities are
amenity to the CI,SP- 2. These areas offer a
required to address the recreational,
ariety of functions and elements incluciing
governmental, and emergency response needs of
passive recreation, scenic corridors, resource
the CLSP- 2 rlmendment 1' lan t rea. These
preser- ation, interpretive signage and informal
services and facilities include parks; police, fire,
recreation activities ( i. e. picnic tables). In
and animal control services; civic Eacilities; and addition, the open space and levee corridor will solid waste services. As the CI. SP- 2 Amendment
prove the interface between urban and natural
Plan area develops, the City and other
reas and define the City' s edge.
responsible agencies will review the plans to
ensure that adequate public facilities and The CLSP- 2 Amendment open space and improvements are provided in a
timely manner. recreational areas consist of the levee and San Joaquin River that border the entire vest side of
Parks and Recreation
the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan rlrea. ' The river
Recreation is a key component in the lifesty-le of provides several different recrearional people residing in any community environment.
opportunities for the community, including
Recreation facilities and parks, in their active and fishing, bird vatching, scenic views, camping and passi- e forms, are an important asset oating launch facilities at Dos Reis Regional contribuung to the stability, attractiveness, and Park. A regional gravel multi-use trail may be quality- of life of a
community. The City of located within the open space adjacent to the Lathrop does not have adopted park/ open space levee if appro red b5r the City of Lathrop and RDdedication or fee requirements for non- 17. The accessibility to the regional trail system, residential de elopment. Such requirements are
if approved, and the San Joaquin River vill
associated with residendal uses which create the be direct and easy, vith wall ing paths and bicycle primary demand for, and beneflt from proximity trails e tending to the north and south project to, recreational facilities. ' I'he CLSP- 2
boundaries.

Amendment designates an open space corridor
along the San Joaquin River le ee frontage. " I"he
CLSP-2 Open Space Interface
open space provides opportuniues to create an l near Com unity Park, Opera Space, Levee arrd interconnected trail system fYom the CI, SP- 2 area 1] eidhGor{ ood Interfae• e to the Phase 1 Central Lathrop Specific Plan area,
the West Lathrop Specific Plan area, and the The interEace between the linear community South I.,athrop Specific Plan area. park, open space and levee areas and adjacent development presents opportuniries within the
The general location of CLSP- 2 Amendment CLSP-? mendment Plan 1 rea. Multiple edge parks, open space, and trails are included on treatments are required to maYimize the Figure 5. 1. opportunities therein. Access along the open space/ levee frontage shall be provided as
CLSP-2 Open Space required by RD- 17 and the City of Lathrop.

Pagc 5- 1
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Yhasc 2 Amendment Chapter F ive: Communiry Services and 1 2cilities here appropriate, the interface should be The City of Lathrop will provide anitnal services designed to allow residents to enjoy and to the CLSP- 2 Plan rea. r nvnal Services appreciate the adjacent trails, park facilities, and Officers protect the health and safety of humans open space areas, while providing a safe and animals and are responsible for enforcing environment. local and state laws regarding animals and their humane treatment. Services include, but are not
Dos Reis RegionalPark Interf ace limited to, patrol, stray/ abandoned animal pickThe Count operates and maintains Dos Reis up, aggressive animal impounds, injured animal pick-up, humane investigations, nuisance
I ark, an esisting park within the CLSP- 2 Area.

Dos Reis Regional Park provides for boat access
vestigations, wild animal complaints/
to the San Joaquin River as well as camping and Pounds, licensing, dead animal impounds, recreational opportunities for those from out of
adoption, and education.
town. The Central Lathrop Park Master Plan
New CLSP- 2 r mendment development will be
design integrates with and thereby enhances the
required to pa5 the City' s Capital Facility
existing Dos Reis Regional Park. The interFace of
Development Fee to offset capital faciliry costs
the Dos Reis Park with the community park vill
1ssociated with animal services. In addition,
benefit both park systems and their users. Dos
development will be required to pay its pro rata
Reis Park will continue to be accessed via Dos
share of start-up and ongoing costs.

Reis Road. No additional boat parking facilities
will be provided as part of this Project. The Fire andEmergency Services interface bet veen Dos Reis Park and the future
adjacent limited industrial parcel shall include a The CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area is within the masonry wall. See Chapter 7 Design Guidelines service area of the Lathrop- Manteca Fire for more information. Protection DisCrict ( L1 iFD). The District has mulriple Fire stations, three of which are located
Police arldArlimal Coritrol Services vithin rhe Ciry of Lathrop. Station 34, located near the intersection of River Islands Parkwa}• s
Z'he City of Lathrop operates its own police and Golden Valley Parkway, will initially be the department for police protection services. The
First responder to serve the CLSP- 2 area. In
Cin of Lathrop Police Department is located at
addition, Station 31, located on I:ast J Street in
940 River Islands Parkwa within Lathrop, Lathrop, and Station 35, on Somerston near approsimately- t o and a half miles south of the
ver Islands, vill both also provide service to
Plan rea. The Lathrop Police Department
the CLSP- 2 area.
provides services such as emergency law
enforcement, routine patrol, traffic enforcement, rhe LI'IFD maintains delivery standards for the a Crime Stoppers program, and a Crime pYovision of emergency services that adhere to Prevention program. The Police Department has the National Fire Protection ssociations 35 sworn officers and 12 non- sworn professional national standards and outlined in the I.I fFD personnel. 3nnual Report.

New development in the CLSP- 2 r mendment Development in the CLSP- 2 I mendment Plan Plan Area will be required to pay the City' s
Rrea will pay applicable fire sernice fees and
Capital Facility Development Fee to offset assessments required to fund its fair share of capital facility costs associated with police L1 1FD facilities and services. In addirion, all protection. In addition, development vill be development is required to conform to the required to pay its pro rata share of start- up and California Fire Code, the City' s Fire Sprinkler ongoing costs.

Y1gc 5- 2
Central l.athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter l ive: Community 5ervices and I acilities Ordinance, fire flo v standards, and other
applicable requirements.

Solid Waste
Republic Services is the franchise vaste hauler
for residential and non- residential uses. The
County of San Joaquin provides solid waste
disposal facilities, including transfer stations and
landfills. The City utilizes designated carts for the
storage and collection of garbage, green ( yard)
vaste, and paper, plastic, can, and botde
recycling. ' I'o reduce solid waste collecuon,
builders, as mandated by AB 939, are required to
implement and utilize construction debris
recycling programs.

I' age 5- 3
Central Latkirop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendment Chapter Six: Utilities and llrain gc Infr structure Chapter Six: Utilities and Drainage Infrastructure
InttoduCtiott demands ( including those of the Plan rlrea) compared to available water supplies to ensure
There is a
very limited amount of infrastructure that adequate water is, or will be, available to currently serving e
risting development within accommodate the CLSP- 2 Amendment The the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. In order to
studies conclude that with the combined
accommodate the proposed development,
groundwater and SCSWSP surface water sources
numerous onsite and offsite inErastructure adequate water supplies would be available to improvements will be needed. This chapter
serve the CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan rea.
describes the major infrastructure improvements
needed to serve the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Table 6. 1 identifies Plan Area water demand for Area. Other infrastructure elements are discussed the CLSP- 2 Amendment. The availability of in other chapters of this Specific Plan as follows: potable vater is a primary factor regulating the level of development in the CLSP- 2 Amendment
Circulation and Transportation ( roads, bike Plan Area. paths, and trails) - Chapter T'hree
In addition to the potable supply, the CLSP- 2
Lmergency Services ( fire and police) - l mendment makes ma: imum use of rec}' cled Chapter Five vater ( treated vaste vater) for the irrigation of public rights of va5- and open space. F urther, the
Potable Water potential esists for the irrigation of private open S1 py
space areas and other landscaping with the use of
recycled water to the estent allowed by the City
The City will suppl potable water to Yhe CLSP- of Lathrop' s ' aste Discharge Permit issued by 2 rlmendment Plan Area. The CLSP- 2 the RWQCB.
rlmendment Develo ers vill fund the provision
of water service. The City will provide potable Treatment groundwater from the City' s eYisting vell field
and potable surface water from Phase 1 and/ or 1'reatment of water supply occurs, as necessary, the Phase 2 eYpansion of the South Countyto meet federal, state, and local standards. The Sutface later Supply Program( SCSa' SP) bj the SCSWSP suxface water supply is treated at a South San Joaquin Irrigation District ( SSJID).
centralized facility located outside the Cit of
I,athrop, with Lathrop' s ground vater treated at
The City has prepared a citytivide 2020 Urban the wellhead. As a result, there is not a need for ater Management Plan ( UWI 1I'). The Plan potable vater treatment facilities within the Plan reflects the City' s
existing and future water
rea.

Pa; c 6- 1
entral]. athrop Specific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter Six: Utilities and Drainagc Tnfrastructure Table 6. 1: E.rtimated lYlater Demand
Demand
Demand
Designation Land Use Area( acres) Factor
d
gpd/ ac)
LI- CL Limited Industrial 618. 2 926 572, 453
OS- CL Open Space 293 0
P- CL Park 11. 2 0
Major Road Right- of-Way 65. 3 0
Total 72. 0 572, 453
Storage an l Pressarre area, and this site can accommodate a second tank to serve development of the CLSP- 2
Potable water storage and distribution will be
mendment. Booster pump modifications may
provided to the CI. SP- 2 rlmendment Plan Area
be required. The exact location of the vater tank
by extending the City' s
existing pipe network into 11 be determined when more detailed the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area generally development proposals are submitted. The first consistent with the City Master Urility Plan.
project to develop within the CLSP- 2
Project proponents in the CLSP- 2 Amendment
mendment Plan r,rea will be responsible for
will construct and/ or contribute fees toward its
preparing the water study= to determine the size,
proportional share of water storage as specified
location, and construction timing of the water
in the City Master Utility Plan. tank.

The City' s 2020 tTrban` ater Management Plan
potaGle l" aterPtpeNetavork
identifies three components of water storage
including emergency, fire and equalization. I"he Cit- currently serves properties along Dos Fmergency storage is intended to provide water Reis, De Lima and a portion of Manthey Roads supply in the e ent there is aproblem with the with potable water via old pipes. It is possible typical daily supply. Emergency supply can that some, if not all, of these existing pipes may consist of " emergenry only" vells and/ or tank need to be replaced to accommodate pipe and storage. Fire storage is intended to provide` vater street unprovements associated with supply to fight fires and must be accommodated development oF the CLSP- 2 rlmendment. by tank storage. Equalization storage is intended
to help dampen out the impact of daily Each of the majox roadways in the Plan rea fluctuations in demand and must be includes a water main as sho vn on Figure 6. 1. accommodated by tank storage. The timing and These proposed mains form a looped size of the waCer storage tank and booster pump
infrastructure vateY system into which individual
will be determined with future planning efforts industrial and commercial parcels in the CLSP- 2 such as during tentative map and/ or site plan r nendment Plan Area and will subsequendy be revie v
processing. The water tank could connected. It is estimated that the water mains potentially be located anywhere within the CLSP- will be 12" diameter pipes. The esact size of the 1 or CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. f1 1. 6- mains vill be determined through a water model million- gallon water tank and booster pump analy sis that considers the rest ofthe City' s vater station was construcCed within the CLSP Phase 1 system and pressures necessary to meet ftre flow Yagc 6-
Central Lathcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 lmendment Chapter Six:[ itiliries and Drainage Infrastructure requirements. The water model will be prepared
vith future planning efforts such as during
tentative map and/ or site plan review processing.

P gc 6- 3
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptcr Six: Utilities and llraina; e Infrastructure Figure 6. 1- Potable Water Pipe Network
CENTRAL LATNROP 5PECTFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
w
F;
a ,
x
s
4 1' is" j yv '
N"
ti x h,u « c i n
u t/ r
g,'`
t
a"'
L' "`
i„.k r x "',. t fi
9+ w., F'" 4 w
0 t
s ,: . , „ d a., a'$ L Ai, ,"%
Y, '!,,
k r

JTREET/
r a. . n a/ .
d
r
a.
p Arri m tc
rlr
W f1 Z'#
g
D€ UMA ROAD
ile Rtt 1F1 14P . t MYYXIi lr1 4 lt1 . r 9. n
Wg
5 ST EEFO ,«
a,
k
Q
a
z",? s
DO5 REIS ROAD
w
4q h
9 y s
R , `,. er''
ar+ a ,
y
w 4r a
v
a a Z,
r, • w y
3 - s 1RM MMYlM9C# Rh1{ y4
9-
Q -,.

WAY
r '<
t,.;
s„
x
POTEN7IAC,, CtSP PNASE 2 x
7dATER TANK SITE a
s° '
EXISTING 1. 6 MILLI( FN 9
x
GALL4H WATER TANK s
Y ,
a* y
H
a.,,,
LLG[ ND
Praposeel Disvibution Pipe
ExistingllisvibutianPipe
CLSP: Amendmant Plan Area Bauadazy
Fi ure 6. 1.
7VDA T M

T S PQTABLE WATER PIPE NET WORK
a Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
Yage 6- 4
Central Lathcop Speciflc Plan— I'hase 2 Amendment hapter Six: Utilities and Drainage Tnfrastructurc Wastewater Once cumulative wastewater generation from
Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phases 1 & 2
When the City adopted the CLSP in 2004, a
eaceeds 400, 000 gpd, offsite force main
public sewer system did not e ist in the CLSP
provements are required to increase the
Plan r rea. Existing rural residences and other
overall capacity of the system. To achieve the
developments disposed of their wastewater
increased capacity for the vaste vater system
though private septic systems and/ or leech
thin the CLSP Plan l rea the follo ving
fields. However, a
public sewer system ` vas
provements are needed:
installed with the CLSP Phase 1 development
that was oversized for the CLSP Phase 2 Plan djust the pump flo v control Area. New pipes and a new pump station will be restrictions as required at the esisting required within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Central Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 1 Area that vill connect to the e
sting
pump station.
infrastructure within Phase 1. CLSP-?
l mendment Developers will fund or construct Disconnect the Central I,athrop Specific the new infrastructure through the payment of Plan to 1 Iossdale intertie and construct a development impact fees. manifold connecting the Central Lathrop Specific Plan 14" and 18" force
E.ctimated lY asteavater Generation
mains to the River Islands 12" and 18"
The estimated vastewater generation from the force mains near the end of Harlan Road CLSP- 2 Amendinent Plan Area is approxirnately at the I-5 crossing. Construct a ne v 20" 219, 461 gallons per day average dry weather flow force main from the Central Lathrop AD`% F. ' I'he City- of Lathrop utilizes two Specific Plan/ River Islands manifold to different demand factors for wastewater the Consolidated Treatment Facility generation. Dry uses can assume a demand factor CTF manifold. of 172 gpd/ ac and other uses can assume a
demand factor of 35 gpd/ ac. If the dr5 use
The offsite wastewater improvements are shown
demand is used for a
particular development a
in Figure 6. 3.
deed restriction would need to be recorded. The
more conservative 355 gpd/ ac vas used to
Treatmerat
generate waste vater demands in order to sire the aste vater generated b development in the infrastructure Table 6. 2
summarizing the CLSP- 21 mendment Plan rlrea will be tteated to estimated vastewater generation. meet Federal, State, and City standards before it is disposed of. As shown on Figure G2,
Collection Sy.ctem vaste vater will be treated by existing capacity The CLSP- 2 r mendment vould rely on a
gravity
and future espansions to the Consolidated
wastewater collection infrastructure system as Treatment Facility ( CTF. shown on Figure 6. 2. Due to the Elat topography
of the area, a lift ot pump station will be needed The City has a river discharge permit that will to convey wastewater to the esisring Central
allow for the disposal of recycled water to the San
Lathrop Specific Plan Phase 1 pump station.

Joaquin Kiver. The City constructed the outfall in
From that pump station, force main systems
the Fall of 2022.
convey wastewater to the treatment plant.

Pagc 6- 5
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 lmendment Chapter Six: Urilirics and Drainage Infrastructure Tuble 6.2: F..rtimated Seaver I emand
Demand
Demand
Designation Land Use Area ( acres) Factor
d
gpd/ ac)
LI- CL Limited Industrial 618. 2 355 219, 461
OS- CL Open Space 29. 3 0
P- CL Park 11. 2 0
Majot Road Right- of-Way 653 0
Total 724. 0 219, 461
Yagc 6- 6
Central Lathcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 r mendment Chapter Six: Utilities and llrainage Infrastructure Figure 6.2- Wastewater Network
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAid PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
6 7 a , y;.
r n
yy,rA e` ,
u g i, +
Q y m
y
Y k
r i''"
P
v` 5
t,,
F '
c a -.

H '
k
k` e'"
K f
y. w k
7 Z:
a
c . rm& , a d4e., , sn n f `
y
i
d
0 r
d 3b I „ vl,,, z ,'" 9 ;
t. T .. . n.;i ,
i ,,,,
a,.. ' F;.., r .. , i;,
fv .

STREE7 A
r r r r i. r rrrir r a,. „_, ,.
v5
q O
m
i
Am
N — mi ti a. n
r'
ti
DE LIMA ftOAD
9^
v t
r'," 51`R EF D
p s„'_ ;
F i' 5
w oas a is Roa, o
9 r,:.
w.; # F„ i
Ct ih( ECT TO EXISTING
EXISTING PUMP STATIpM
r
H
2, s A rA s wA r
x ' t `
jX,,, k r 4 r % X' 4
y' f 1 a z aR;
y
t
s
IMr
a G .
y
c,',
t
n - j
r r
t a
r9
y « " . a > ` `
t a
ffi- i,a,.#' „°.

LEGEND
Cieavity Pipe
i Forcemain to CTF
Ezistit g Gra iry Pipe
CLSP- 2 m:ndment Plan Area I#ouad

N D A T N
roPose+i LitC Station Figure 6. 2
NT. s Y S, n nps t, n WASTEWATER NETWORK
Centrat Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
M
Yage 6- 7
m ndment Cha ter Six: Utiliries and Dcaina e Infrastructure Central Lathcop Specific 1 lan— I hase.., e p K Figure 6.3- Offsite Wastewater Force Main Improvements
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
e y
y
bs + i riI"'' iw` ii r: i.REE.i. s w w}
m A l
01 r a s
ry* G
pt DElIh1AR0AQ z
9 t'
G STREECp i
2 G+ t{',p (
DOS REIS RqAD
L w s. i w r f4 a ..

CLSP PUMP S' sFTtq31 AD. tUSi
PUM1tP fLfYlt AS NEEtiED SPAR7' AN WAY lA7HROP Rf) AD , ', k: W y.
y a
s ST 4
Q' f
r^ Fo pz a. Rp
paQ r`
4 S
hC
z
M,,* a.;
LOUISEAVEHUE . , $'
a,," S
y D( BCOa1N€ CT CLSPil605SDALE
q
INTERTIE ( CL05E VALVE}
y h'
2 4
4 rq ?«:*; d ...
q
TpWNE CENTER O 1
l
ya z
i
DRIVE
r
p
dQ
o
1' `" 2
t y' r
s
GONSiAUCT iIAtJIF4lD
CQMNECtI" iG ATYER AM9S
APfO G SP fOp NS ', CTF ' ""
y '
2,'.,," N . , i, i iN:/, H7.; \
ffi+:
w
5 Y
Lece` n
@xi Lng CLSP Pcxcemain( lk"& td"
Existing tilossdalc Forccmain t8" @ IZ" 1
@xiating Riv Y TSlands fureemsin( P2"& 18"}
Fhv wc r1: U" Fasemain to CTF f Alignment T861
r 'LSP- 2 Amendmeni Plan Aresi Bound ry
Figure 6. 3

OFFSITE WASTEWATER
NONTM
N. T.S FORCE MAIN IMPRO EMENTS
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
cKa cics aux s wntyc« s
l.iittli' Op, d
a

Page 6 ends

Central I, athcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Six: UtIlities and llrainage lnfrastnicture Reeyeled Water such as common open space areas and
landscaping around buildings.

The CLSP- 2 Amendment will maYimize reuse
opportunities for recycled water. The term Criteria for management of the recycled water recycled vater" refers to wastewater that has system and public education about it will be been treated and disinfected to tertiary levels. established in future reports ( or other ater treated to this level has been determined documents) and will be subject to City approval. by governmental regulations to be acceptable for
human contact without cause for concern and is IZecycled ll' aterPipe Netavon commonly used for irrigation. The use of
recycled water is regulated by the Reg,ional Water n existing recycled water pipeline is located in Quality Control Board ( RWQCB) and the Golden Valley Park ay and Stanford Crossing Department of Health Services, vhich apply and will be the connection point for the Plan stringent vater quality, treatment and I rea. Each of the major roadways in the Plan disinfection standards.
r rea includes a recycled vater main as shown in
Figure 6. 4. These proposed mains form a looped
The use of recycled water for irrigation serves to infrastructure rec} cled water system into which conserve potable vater for other uses. In public and potentially private landscaped areas addition, in the event the potable water supply is can be connected. limited at any time, such as a" dry yeaY" situation,
the use of recycled water ensures a
supply foY Due to the limited demand fox recycled vateY landscaped areas and reduces the likelihood that Within the Plan Area, the City* Lngineer can potable vater vould be needed for this purpose.
determine the need for recycled water
improvements with future development
I'he CLSP- 2 Amendment proposes to make applications. The pipe netivork illustrated on recycled water available for public irrigation uses. Figure 6. 4 is conceptual and subject to final I1 is includes irrigation of landscaped areas review by d1e City Engineer when ptiiblic vithin street rights- of-way and open space. In improvement plan are prepared. addition, there may be potential for the use of
recycled water for private irrigation uses as well,
Yage 6- 9
Central l. athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 1mendment Chapter Six: Utilities and llraina; e Infrastructure Figure 6.4- Recycled Water Pipe Network
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFiCd PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
a'' :
k '¢ d W)
i , bi ',
t;. a y Yy 7 ,,,
a%r'; "; ^ ,,,..' i /xi 4 w'"
p$;,
tr,' p ,", i.. m 4
G
d3/
P - X qh R
y
J
r.,j 0"
J ' ztad t,. 1 ; s, .
p
F',' q d yi
a,
tf
k
e/ . aw. a ff' k
c,
v,
g ", a
a, ^ '- >,..
t.,,`' r
i r,,,,,, m
s , '
a.
x
9 t4 w
a.!'!

STREET A
w,! i'!!s''!, z lS. .: . m, ._. vl',« R
M J
a':
r
i
s
i
j
DE L( MA RflAL7 E,., j , A
4- ' 9+ rae eer ritAA wr ww r+ nessA rex k& in wa; r e rwa- s . q
a
ak t,.".

STR: ET tr..

G
1' n z> „
G. ' r s.

Qr _ y' "
DO5 REI5 ROAD t "'
6 li' Si' lCiiiSi` i'i ii{ i"YI' ik' ii i"/ii!{" i°'r'S' frr iii: ' s; r
4 ra a
i '..
f
n
y
a
J
ax
x
C q" a.
a PARTA y s;
A, WAY 6.
r"'
r r t ,
2,
n' v
Hl
k
M'"* S,°
p t l f
w
T + F
6„ y
ryV
sa f. N..4
v f; i
T
x'
LEGENU
s..... r Disriihuticm Pipc
i,•,.• Exis-tin DistrihutionPipe
fCSP- 2 A mrtdment Plan Area Boundary
Figure 6.4

N O A T H RECYCLED WATER
v. TS PIPE NETWORK
Y s Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca

Page 6 ends

Central] athrop Specific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter Sv: Utiliries and Drainage Infrastructure Flood Protection and Storm Water degree of design fle bility be incorporated into Quality the drainage program. This flexibilit will allow sufficient latitude for each new development
Backgroatnd within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan tlrea to
r n e
sting levee along the San Joaquin River
design an internal system that meets its siteprotects the Plan r rea from flooding RD- 17 specific needs, so long as the design is consistent operates and maintains the levee. The Federal
th the overall CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area
Emergency Management Agency ( FEI 7A) has
vrainage Plan.
categorized the Plan Area as being in Zone X as
shown on Flood Insurance Rate Map ( FIRl Existiyag Conditions a ad Constrairtt.c panel numbers 06077C0605f and 06077C0610F. The CLSP area is part of a larger vatershed The Zone X definition relevant to the Plan rea known as " the Northern r rea" that includes is " areas protected by levees from 1% annual areas both east and vest of Interstate 5. chance flood".

The CLSP- 2 mendment Plan rea is about 20
Tlie RD- 17 levee system has been undergoing feet lower than the top of the adjacent San seepage berm and/ or other improvement repair/ oaquin River levee. Therefore, runoff must be upgrade projects to increase the resistance to pumped over/ through the levee. 1'o avoid under- seepage and through- seepage in order adverse impact to the levees near the CLSP Plan maintain compliance with applicable Federal, r rea, peak discharge is limited to 30% of the 100- State, and local standards. A minimum 120 foot ear flow rate from the vatershed as stated in the no- build" buffer along the levee as measured 2004 CLSP and CLSP FIR. Therefore, the from the levee toe is provided within the CLSP- CLSP- 2 Amendment incorporates on- site 2 mendment Plan Area to allow adequate space detenrion to store excess runoff during periods for future improvements if/ when needed. of peak storm acti ity.

RD- 17 has been working with the Department of Two storm drain outfalls to the San Joaquin ater Resources ( D rR) and the Central Valley River esist within the CLSP Plan Area. One Flood Protection Board ( CVFI' B) to eealuate outfall is located within the Phase 1 area and the options for providing 200- y- ear protection for the other is located within the Phase 2 area. The 1 Zossdale Tract including the CLSP- 2 ouCfalls are sized to accommodate the lmendment Plan :- 1rea. The 120' " no-build" development of the CLSP- 2 mendment Plan buffer within the CLSP-? mendment Plan rlrea Area.
provides sufFicient area to accommodate any
100- year improvements and any additional r1n e: isting storm cirain force main is located incremental improvements to provide 200- year within Dos Reis Road and connects existing protecrion in the future in conjunction with the development east of Interstate- 5 to tlie esisting Mossdale Tract 200- year flood protection outfall located at the end of Dos Reis Road. improvements to meet the urban level of flood
protection criteria. hen the Cit- approved the 2004 CLSP, runoff from the CI SP Plan Area was collected in a
Using design standards de elopedin cooperation system of shallow agricultural ditches, roadside with the City, the CLSP drainage improvement ditches, and percolation basins vith some small program vill provide for efficient discharge of private agricultural pumps that ciischarged vater runoff from a 10- year storm event while also to the San Joaquin River. However, public storm protecting the site from flooding during a 100- drain infrastructure is now available that was year storm event It is also desirable that a high built with Phase 1 of the CLSP. EYisting pipes Pagc 6-] 1
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Six: UCilities 2nd Drainage Infrastructure are located at the northern end of Golden Valley Y/atershed" detention faciliues that Park-way just south of Dos Reis Road and at the hold the runoff; and northern end of Stanford Crossing.
r pump station and force main that
Shallow groundwater e sts throughout the
conveys water to an existing San Joaquin
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area and is influenced River outfall structure. by both the water level in the river and subsurface flow from areas of higher elevation to the The CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan ilrea consists of east, as vell as local irrigation practices. Even two major drainage sheds with underground though the g,roundwater level may decline with a
storage pipes to reduce the peak discharge from
reduction in farming activities, it is expected that the Plan Area to the San Joaquin River. this high ground water condition vill generally atershed 4 is a part of both the Central Lathrop persist after development, impacting both Specific Plan Phase 1 and this Phase 2 Specific construction and the future operation of the Plan Amendment. The CLSP- 2 Amendment storm drain system. Infiltration into the storm proposes to modifj- the boundary of the etiisting pipcs through joints and underground structures atershed 4 to better align vith e sting property can Yesult in escessive pumping demands boundaries. See Figure 6. 5 for the eYisting throughout the life of the project. This impact watersheds and Figure G. 6 for the proposed will be reduced by proper installation of pipes vatersheds. having rubber gasket sealed joints.

The modification to the watershed 4 boundary
F3igh groundwater levels can also impact the will require additional storage which can be effectiveness of detention basins. To the eYtent accomplished with large diameter storin drain that groundwater enters the basins, the storage pipes.
available for the runoff is duninished. There are
no detention basins proposed, ho vever if a In addiuon to the added storage, a ne v 39cfs detention basin is proposed in- lieu of pump vill need to be added to the esisting Phase underground storage, the bottom of the basin 1 storm drain pump station. The pump station is vill be designed to maintain a minimum of two already- set up to accept the additional pump so feet of separation from groundwater or other phy-sical pump station modifications are not design measures vill be implemented such as ezpected.
impervious liners with sub drain systems.

The remainder of the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan
The Storrye Collection System ea falls vithin / atershed 3. Large diameteY storm drain pipes vill be utilized to provide the
Runoff from the CLSI'-? r mendment Plan rlrea required underground storage. The underground is designed to discharge to the river through an pipe storage system locarion will be dispersed esisting outfall located near the south vest corner throughout the CI..SP- 2 Amendment Plan Area, of the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area at the end th individual developments responsible for a of Dos Reis Road and the esisting outfall within
per acre proportional share of the overall storage
the Phase 1 area. " I'he existing outfalls are
requirement. A ne v pump station and force main
regional facilities. As shown on Figure 6. 7, the vill be constructed that will connect to an CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan 1rea will consist of a
esisting outfall structure. The existing outfall
system having the following three integtated
structzire will need to be retrofit to meet current
components. design standaYds. The e isting headwall is
etpected to remain in-place, but the esisting
Gravity lines that collect and deliveY
pipes connecting to the headwall will need to
surface runoff;
Page G- 12
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptcr Six: Utiliries and lltainage Infrastn cture removed and replaced near to the top of the 10 to 100- year Event-` hen the capacit of levees to increase the elevation of the pipes. New the underground system is exceeded during valves will also need to be added to the pipes as an intense storm event ( in escess of a tenrequired by the current design standards. The year event), water flows will be detained in Storm drain- system illustrated in Figure 6. 7 is underground storage pipes, designed for the conceptual and subject to change based on future 100- year storm event and distributed planning and engineering efforts. throughout the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. This design method keeps the Elow
The proposed stormwater collection system depth underground, within acceptable limits functions by discharging all runoff directly into i.e., one foot below floor elevations) and the the river up to the point where the runoff rate threat of flooding posed to private property exceeds the capacity of the pump station. Vhen is minixnized. 3n alternative design could be the rate of runoff eYceeds the pump station to allow the streets to flood and provide capacity, water " backs up" into the detention overland release by means of a descending pipes until the runoff rate declines and once gradient directing surface flow towards a again equals the capacity of the pump station. proposed detention basin. This type of The vater level in the storage pipes then design would require flow in the streets. decreases, emptying completely.
10 to 100- year Event with Pump Discharge
Based on a
preliminary design analysis the limited — The CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan appro cimate volume of the underground storage Area storm drain system is also designed to and masimum allowable discharge rates are provide flood protection in circumstances summarized in Table 6. 3. Storage is based on the Yequiring a reduction in flow rates of the ma imum discharge Yate sho vn. system pumps that discharge into the San Joaquin River. The Central Valley F^ lood
T ble 6.3: Y atershed Detention Faczlitie. r ancl Paimp Protection Board and the Cit may limit river Station Si e.r
discharge to pre- development levels
atershed l xitnum Total whenever the river stage exceeds certain Pumping Storage flood elevations. ' hen pump discharge is Rate limited, the CI.,SP- 2 Amendment Plan rlrea
CFS _ lcre- feet must be able to accommodate the volume of 3 176.7 1. 53 a 100- year, 24- hour storm without flooding 4 78. 6 1736 buildings. Under these e treme
Total 255. 3 18. 89 circumstances, the volume of water that Floo l Proleilzon must be stored in thc Plan 11rea may- e: ceed the capacity of the detention facilities and
t1 key element of the CI, SP- 2 Amendment Plan will be heldin the streets, parl ing lots and/ or 1rea storm drain system is its ability to handle other areas. the runoff that occurs during a high intensity
storm. " I'he drainage system provides mulriple The CLSP- 2 r mendment Plan 11rea grading layers of protection based on the severity of concept preserves the elevation of the streets storm events: within the watershed at appro imately the same elevation as eYisting conditions. During a rare
10- year Event - The underground system is condition, when the San Joaquin River is high designed vith capacity to accommodate the and the storm vater pumps must be reduced, the drainage flows anticipated to occur as a result underground storage allo vs runoff to be spread of a 10- year storm event.

Pagc 6- 13
entral], athrop Spccific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter Six: Utiliries and Drai age InErastructure throughout the shed avoiding excessive depth of Inlet stenciling inundation in any one area.

Street sweeping
The 2022 Lathrop General Plan amendment
changing residential uses to I,united Industrial Stormwater treatment must meet the criteria of uses in the CLSP- 2 1lmendment Plan Area is the Multi-Agency Post Construction Stormwater consistent vith the floodplain management Standards Manual. Additional requirements may strateg included in the San Joaquin Area Flood be imposed on some industrial and commercial Control Agency ( SJAFCA) 200- year Fix- in- Place uses. levee improvement project for the Mossdale
Tract. It is anticipated that ne v public roads within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area will be treated
StormavaterQuality with roadside bioretention areas and storm vatet quality for the individual developments vill be i'he CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan Area drainage treated onsite in bioretention areas, prior to
system will include features designed to ensure
discharging into the public storm drain system.
that the stormwater quality meets current water Per Section 1. 5 of the Multi- Agency Post quality standards in conformance with Phase II
Construction Stormwater Standards Manual
MS4 National Pollutant Discharge F_.limination
public roadway replacements and widenings System ( NPDES) Yegularions. Because the site allow for reductions and/ or exceptions in storm
discharges into the San Joaquin River, runoff
water qualit treatment requirements.
quality must also meet standards of d e
regulatory agencies.

The storm water runoff on Dos Reis Road
between Stanford Crossing and Golden Valley Runoff will be treated to the " maximum extent Parkway is exempt from storm water quality
practicable" bp unplementing appropriate source
requirements per Section 1. 5 ofthe 1 7ulti-t gency and treatment control Best Management Post Construction Stormwater Standards I Tanual
Practices ( BI iPs). These practices may include,
but are not limited to:
because the addition of traffic lanes results in an
alteration of 50° o or less ofthe eYisting Dos Reis
13ioretention Road impereious area in this section of roadway and the proposed 8' trail and bicy cle lane are
Infiltration basin graded to runoff to adjacent vegetated areas.

Similarly, the storm water runoff from Manthey
Underground water quality vaults ( i.e.,
Road is e. empt from storm water quality
CDS vaults)
Yequirements per Section 1. 5 ofthe 1 Zulti-tlgency
Post Construction Stormwater Standards Manual
Disconnected roof leaders ( i.e., roof
because tlle addition of traffic lanes results in an
leaders connect to " bubble- up" inlets in
alteration of 50% or less ofthe existing Manthey landscaped areas away from building Road impenTious area in this section of foundations rather than to the stortn
rovement and the proposed S' trail and
drain system) bicycle lane are graded to runoff to adjacent Swales
vegetated areas.

Section 1. 5 of the Multi-Agency Post
Do vnspout and/ or inlet filters Construcuon Stormwater Standards l lanual also allows for the reduction of storm water treatment
Porous Pavements
area required to treat runoff from Dos Reis Road
Yagc 6- 14
Central I,athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 iAmendment Chapter Six: Utiliries and llxaina; e Infrastraetuce between Golden Valley Park vay and Manthey
Road because the addition of traffic lanes results
in an alteration of SO% or less of the eYisting Dos
Reis Road impervious area in this section of
roadway and the proposed 8' trail and bicycle
lane are graded to runoff to adjacent vegetated
areas.

It is likely other street replacements/ widenings in
the CLSP- 2 rlmendment Area will fall into these
reductions/ ezceptions categories in the future
reducing the required treatment areas for public
roadways as directed by the City.

Pagc 6- 15
Central]. athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Six: Urilities and llrainage Infrastructure Figure 6.S- Existing Watersheds
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECiFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
ie "•`. "`
y
d . za, ,.
7' v r i, 9r F y
y
u„, a . r.,, ti„ w,,
a
v a ',
wo,
i , r
y r° , a,,;
t
a
z `
y
r"
d: t
r f i
1q i ',. r.
fwv(
r s° ». •.
3 s
a':,, en %
t:
y/ t'',"
t . °" ;
z.
r,$
9/ q ) rY 4'.
4 Fi,
r t^
F '
h!' mGN'/d/ 2,%/. va, ,
yrp. , {
M
k.,,/./...
j-" rf bP
r r ww r* w rrr Ar s r, R, w w- MA 1Mfi it t w w w
c. . y l 4. l 4+'
1 O
rn m
f[\ k
n
Lf
a
DE LiMA ROAD
9 . t
v
9pG2, STREET D
1 f'i, ' ax. ""
3 q'
7'
aas R es Roao r
t, a t} w s E' i- i .

E 1 & u,
y tS ,
4 i '
as T
iyz ' i
p s''`
kt ' ,*
F . O s-- s c.:
i ,` e n
SPARTRN WAY`;
s >
9' ,,;;" ;,
i , ;
y
F
r "+ r'"` r
s ; '^`
v
r,
x,
a
4 , r.,'
l
d
r"i _ /' `
r,,
y h#
L- f r "
E`
r.si' v
LF;GEN[ 3
W`atc shcd Baundary Watcrshcd 4 falls within CLSP- I
OWatershed Num6er
CLSP- 2 Arr ndment Pl; ua Area
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Ama Boundary
Fi ure 6. 5
a A T~
N. T. S. EXISTIN WATERSHEDS
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca

Page 6 ends

Central], athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptet Six: Utiliries and Dcainage Infrastmcture Figure 6. 6- Proposed Watersheds
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
E"
t i " .
j
v ti' 4 .
d
r."` §
r,
a
5x
k
y5`*r. . n ¢
a',
s ";:, a.„,.' R.:- v i.:% .. „ , , a,. n 1uxh. c, y',,,< , y, .,.", r% "," .. ,
x
Yv z i r' i s r
s i' s//,
u
y
i
m
y . ..
y;;, w., Px,'; i" 5; Si,. x ,
3, 3 s r , a
r , v
e. : 4^, w v9' .
2 Yr<' .
r $
q
q
j
1 v
y
rs71 6
ri: t N r b3
39',°ffi v
tk' r,e tir.<idsl
w s ,
STREET A 9
w w a r we w w+ eaw r
l s,' n.,
r
p:+
m rn
LD r'
J z..

DE LlMA ROAR
s.

E r
o", p.
9 G i STREET Q
t'
w.. i. r. .,. :, ,
G
i
i
4* a . '
r< ,
OS REI$ ROAD
r r- a+ rr a rr-rr bW L» h ti i
ti..
s
iP ti t. . w r 4 ""
w
s
e 3 `
i,'7/i;`-
a
J
2 i' ,
y
v
lJ T ' t °
h
F
a "% ,
Q ' rs

SPARTAN WAY
A,
a i
E'
s
x", ti
a' arr
i 1 Y
s p4 ",,$"
w„
r
J' O
t e M 5 ° s..

LbYi N[ 7
W`atcrshcd Boundary Watershcd 4 fa11s within CLSP- I
OW'dtershe Nwnber
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan r rea
CLSP-2 Amcndment P{an Arca Boundary
Fi ure 6.6
Ts~ PROPOSED WATERSHEDS
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
a"`
Lathrop, Ca
w rz "

Page 6 ends

Central Lathrop Specific Ylan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chapter Six: Utiliries and Drainagc Infzastructurc Figure 6. 7- Stormwater Network
CENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PNASE 2 AMENDMENT
t
r,
1 lt "` . , i
r. r a` s sx` x i%"/ . „ r rq;`",„' ` wg:
ti+, Y rt, , i%'//.:
sLrc. r, C', r;* Z i, A"'£,.

M
a
r /,
w,";
r° t
a
e% Fr; i`
i
s','` Fti"` §, ",,
r;
x„ f
a
x
y vv w a} .' a 7 a C 1
e
Z' „;
w u "`
r a R
w
57REET A
ar w w w s r w r r r, b, A! w, 1 s r r• YY
rvao,.+' au r y
abNltlkRikbloYRWXHe b+ sq$ e A' M1kz+zu rs& x_.
1 4
m
r
r^
r
m
j
i
7 DE LIMA ROAD p.. ,
sar a a4m sm ACa1, SfiAI t Aa eo ys.e rr eera•
ra ••
o-. r ir+i. tqe,... , + » ,
C C t
y STREE' d ' _ -- -..,: -._
0*
µ - .
z
t,.
y
DOS REIS R AD :
it
r,
rr r...:+ w ar w.....` i:.-
4, 4 k
EzisTrN aurFai P4TENTIAL CISP ASE 2 c-,
p y
PUMP STATION LO TiON w
p ; FOR SHED 3
CLSP PNA5E t 2 p ;
fJUTFAIL F4H SPARTAN W 1"
SHE 8 w ' a",
r " XISTIMG SD
4 ir r`,.+"' PUI P STATION FOR ;
l
SkED 1, 2 & 4
EXISTING e'
z
WATER
TANK
F, r, . w
N'atershed A f; ll, within CLSP- I
LE.C; END Rc CLSP- 2 Amcndmrnt Plan Arca
r CLSP Phaic 2 Gravity Pi x iR R'amtshed Nwn r
ra... r CLSP Phase 2 Fareemsin( Uilima e} Deicntiun fncility, CLSP Phase 1 oretmain IExic ing) Pump Statiun
xistingGravityPipe k puife] IStructure
Figure 6. 7 a O w T H
CLSP•? Anumclment Plaa Area Buuminry STORMtiVATER NET WORK N. T. S.

Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
a
Lathrop, Ca
I' age 6- 18
enCral l, athrop Spccific 1' lan— Nhase 2 Amendment Chapter Six: Utiliries and Drainagc Infrastn cture Public UtilityEasements and Utility underground in a joint trench vith gas and Cort' idots electric facilities.

For a discussion regarding the locarion and use
of public utility easements and utility corridors,
please refer to Chapter I'hree: Circulation and
Transportation.

Energyand Telecommunications
Poaver
Electrical senice will be provided to the CLSP- 2
I mendment Plan Area by Pacific Gas and
Electric ( PG& E). EYisting high voltage power
lines, within PG& F_, power line easements,
traverse through a portion of the CLSP- 2
rlmendment Plan rea. Exisung power lines
within the CLSP- 2 mendment Plan Area 1 are
shoccn on Figure G. 8.

It is anticipated that all eYisting overhead power
lines 34. 5Kv and under ill be relocated and/ or
be placed underground as the CLSP-?
Amendment Plan Area develops. New power
lines constructed to serve the Plan 1rea, as well
as all other utilities, will be installed underground
in a typical joint trench.

PG& E will ettend electricin service in a timely
manner to serve each development as needed
during the phased implementation of the CLSP2 rlmendment.

GGTS
PG& E will provide natuYal gas service to the
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. The CLSP- 2
rlmendment Plan Area ties into etisting natural
gas lines located within the CLSP Phase 1 area.

TelecommianicationeTelephone ser- ice, cable television service, and possibly high- speed data lines to the CLSP- 2
mendment Plan rlrea are to be provided by- the
appropriate utility- companies.

Telecommunicarion systems w-ill be located
Pagc 6- 1 9
Central], athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Six: Uriliues and Drainage Tnfrastructure Figure 6.8- Existing Power Lines
CENTRAL LA`I`HROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDM,ENT
n s r
r.N"Y , i '
fr
r
j .. r '$ Y,// s
rq
r 7", s,
i ,
e
G s
n '-'
9,.

Y Ette s ,' i ix
i
r
f'/% v
A',.< , ,,,. , Y" ,., e Yi' r,', 6,
s . , „ ' A , , , x
i
y
4 3 d , .
b /"
v fi'i'
a'
N, , da. .°'' Ffb,£ F S°Yi'' Y .,
Y,
a 5 g ew
4 x
3'}
f, "
c
r f
w" ry ll rs ew M1,";/
tir,
q y ' a. z.y
n
a, a. gs :,
x, .;
rr.
rrrrr wir r. 5i i inw. t+ w w a
ry, $",
7 t tn vi 2 i M
i
x
ml I
u g
r'
t
x
cn n T
c - -` .: '
g
E LlMA ROAD
fi
roi f
r.. » ... n.,..-... n a,,. ""/.

Y
V
x, fi( LL V x$ 4$ Y .>, a. 1..__ k w_
Qf/
f
3 S tic
t; h
f
A ", w g
Lf,* Q' `
t C? OS REl$ ROAO
r..`.# iwwa i:i'" i' a"r iGr", it S`
f 1 Q x ,
r
y g ,
a
a r
s J' F.. w >
C
r "` c i' r,"',
a p .
r
Pa a SPARTAN WAY
a:
ti
r,
F 9d x
ti`
2, 1
i , % jvy„ v
o ,,
a ,,
t e;","',
ar
w;
J
r
m
r" i`
t
i.ecEvo s=

1. C) nly ei sunK 6lf K\ vid 1 IS K' rwerlines are sha+ vn.

Power Lin. e 2. G•.xiw ing 17 K' p werliaes noi shuwn uc rhey a ill bu CLSP• 2 Amendment Plan tlrea IiauadaTy
unJer vunded xith slevelopmrnt.

Fi ure 6. 8
N
T s~ EXISTING POWER LINES
Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
Lathrop, Ca
L . ., , . .. _.-. .

Yage 6- 20
Centcal I, athiop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Seven: Design Guidelines Chapter Seven: Design Guidelines
Introduction Land Use
The Design Guidelines provide the vision for the A brief description and the vision of each land CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area by establishing use designation vithin the CLSP- 2 r mendment minimum standards for character, building Plan r rea are pro rided belo v:
design and landscape elements. The 2022
Ueneral Plan, the CLSP- 2 r mendment and the I. mited Iradrs.rtria! City' s 7oning Code, ensure a coherent well Envisioned as a prominent employmentthought out design for the CLSP- 2 rlmendment generating land use, this designation shall
Plan Area.
pro ide a high degree of functionality, including
The following guidelines provide site design and con renient access to major roadways. Buildings architectural standards, including provisions for Within this area may lil ely be warehouse, landscaping and sustainability efforts applicable manufacturing, assembly and repair- type to development within the CLSP- 2 tlmendment buildings. Careful consideration shall be placed Plan Area. r111 de elopment proposals in the
in the material, color, and scale of buildings as
CLSP- 3 Amendment Plan Area must adhere to
Well as the articulation of each fa ade. Although
the standards and guidelines set forth in this multiple industries vould likely be located in the amended specific plan.

CLSP- 2 c mendment_Plan rea, the architecture
styles of buildings should create cohesion and
These guidelines and standards are consistent compatibility across the CLSP- 2 mendment vith and provide a companion document to the Plan 3rea.

City' s Zoning Ordinance. Standards not
addressed in the CLSP- 2 Amendment shall be Open Space' P rks those set forth in the Lathrop l 2unicipal Code. The Open Space and Park uses are located along San Joaquin River and span the lengtll of the
Put'pose CLSP- 2 Amenciment Plan rea Project rlrea.

The purpose of the guidelines and standards for The existing Dos Reis Country Park vill remain, industrial development, park, and open space is th adciitional park areas proposed to connect to ensure consistency of design bet ieen the
to the open space corridor. The open space
various uses within the CLSP Plan l rea. corridor along the San Joaquin River is intended as a local communiry wide facilit with the
Z'hese guidelines provide for the development of possibility of regional linkage. This Open Space a well- designed project, that is compatible with Corridor would also provide the ability to adjacent land uses of the overall CLSP Plan Area, connect the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area to and is designed to promote accessibility and CI, SP Phase 1 and other developments to the provides the ability for pedestrians and south. Though not required or mandated, alternative modes of transportation to, from and provision is made vithin this CLSP- 2 within the CLSP- 2 mendment Plan rea. lmendment for the construction and use of outdoor recreation facilities such as recreation
fields, fitness equipment and courses, or other
such uses intended for the physical recreation
Yage 7- 1
Central], athrop Spccific Plan— Phasc 2 lmendment Chaptcr Seven: Design Guidetincs and well- being of the community and/ or the c. Encourage streetscape with landscaping. employee users.
d. Provide outdoor lighting for safety and
General principles guide the overall Central security; minimize outdoor lighting from Lathrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 and lay the spilling over to adjacent properties. foundation for standards and guidelines.

Standards and guidelines apply to the entire Architecture.

Phase 2 r mendment Plan r' rea, and standards
and guidelines apply to each land use designation. a. Use design styles, elements, and r ll site design standards and guidelines are
materials that complement or do not
organized into two sections: 1) site design and 2) visually compete vith surrounding architecture. ' ithin each secrion, subcategories contest and scale of neighboring land further define and illustrate design objectives
uses vithin the CLSP- 2 Amendment
through written descriptions and photographic
Plan Area.
e amples that convey desired design elements.

The applicable standards and guidelines support
b. Incorporate distincrive design elements
the design objectives, defining how desired
into buildings including colors and
development should be achieved. building relief.

CLSP- 2Amendment Principles,
Site Design
Standards and Guidelines The CLSP- 2 allo vs for a mix of industrial uses.

Due to the vide variety of allowed uses for The CLSP- 2 Amendment strives for a realistic and attractive development The CLSP- 2
Industrial developments, circulation, site
planning, landscaping, and architecture should be rlmendment, within the existing and surrounciing the key elements that unify development in the landscape, will continue to advance the economic CLSl 2 1 mendment Plan rlrea. Development
itality and job growth in Lathrop by creating a
projects are encouraged to provide a safe and development of quality site design and functional environment for all users and patrons,
architecture. " I'o achieve these goals, e
including pedestrians, bicy cles, and automobiles. following planning and design principl s have Development should reElect quality and risual been developed to assist designers and developers in meeting the CLSP- 2 mendment
appeal as it relates to adjacent streets and
design objectives.
surrounding development. This specific plan
amendment guides future design for the CI.SP-?
Allindustrial projects in the CLSP- 2 Amendment
endment Plan Area 2 but is fle ble in terms
Plan rea should be designed to meet, or exceed of building design, ty-pe, size and locarions. the following planning and design principles: Site 1 larrnind

1. Site Design. A. Circulation
a. Design pedestrian accessible buildings.

The objective of the Central Lathrop Specific
Plan - Phase 2 circulauon is to promote efficient
b. Encourage design elements that consider
and saEe movement of goods and people
environmental conditions, like sun,
throughout the CLSP- 2 r mendment Plan Area.
shade, wind, etc., to impro e the
The circulation design should consider all types
pedestrian experience and provide of users: vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle. natural environmental control.

Yagc 7- 2
Central I,athcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Seven: llesign Guidelines Refer to Chapter 3 Circulation and 1. Land uses that are automobile dependent Transportauon for details on vehicle, pedestrian should be designed to minimize the conElict and bicycle route locations. between pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles, by the following means:

The design of access for large de Telopment areas
and individual project sites should tie land uses Create pedestrian- only connections and existing road vays into the overall circulation between public sidewalks and buildings, net vork in the CLSP- 2 clmendment Plan Area. avoiding crossing cirive- thru lanes In some cases, the internal circulation may be wherever possible; or part ofthe larger CLSP Plan Axea circulation and
street net vork. Place vehicle entrances and drive- thru areas away from main pedestrian entries.

Pedestrians should have continuous sidewalks,
free of obstructions, and vith convenient access
to buildings and other adjacent land uses.
rldditionally, pedestrian connections are
encouraged bet veen site buildings, parking and
othex adjoining uses.
r dditional modes oftravel, including bicycle and
public transit should be incorporated into each
development project. Biryclists should have
consistent safe access from major roadways into
and around each development area to minimize
potential conflicts with vehicles.
4- "
i "
Photo Exarrrple Z
ll7ininn. zug c•ontZict.r Gelrveen pede.rtri trrr, f icycles c iad autorrtobrle.r.

F .',
Pboto Example 1
Pede, rtriarr facilitie. r along pabk c roarl
The follo ving circulauon design guidelines apply
to all development areas of the Central Lathrop
Specific Plan- Phase 2:

Yagc 7- 3
Central Lathrop Specific I' lan— Phasc 2 mendment Chapter Scvcn: llcsign Guidclincs

2. Fach development should provide development sites of the Central Lathrop pedestrian and bicycle connection to Specific Plan- I' hase 2:
adjacent uses within the Central Lathrop
Specific Plan - Phase 2. This would include 1. Where feasible and desirable, buildings public sidewalk connections to internal should maintain close pro: imit to streets; project circularion for pedestrians and public
right- of-way bicycle paths to internal on and Buildings should be sited to be conveniendy off-street routes for bicycles. These located and attract users:
connections should be vell lit and marked
for the safety of its users.

Entrances should be designed to
accommodate safe pedestrian travel;
Parking should have close pro imity to
buildings;
r
I',.

Y a
w°?
a g` i,, tr rY i4.
h:..
rn§k? 3f.,,§
iA }.,,
a v i , 4,
s
l ,; Ir; l 3l tl r
Y
f 4 q'.') Yr
t ,. e I
jt F, ( ' S b1, ` ai`';,,-,. Sd.
qd s R
t

31. d"
k' y
i¢
st',«} s , r
v`'"
a t' S ..
p
t
u er, r. m.: r. i..,., . . ,,,..,' w.

Pboto E.x•nm ile 3
P de.rtriaiz/ Gic c•! e. rafe cro3.ring
mB. Building Placement& Parking 1{ ioto E1 u rplePcarking rear builrling. r Building placement and orientation is key in
creating a safe and efficient site design. Buildings
with uses that rely on visibility should be placed
close to adjacent streets and specifically on highvolume corners. Oprimal building placement on individual development sites can create
opportunities for public or employee spaces,
encourage pedestrian connections, establish
streetscapes, and provide drive- by advertising for
the companies. Building placement and parking
orientation considerations can gready increase
the efficiency of a building.

The following building placement and parking
design guidelines apply to all individual
Yagc 7- 4
Central I. athrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Atnendment Chapter Seven: Desi m Guidclincs Create spaces with gathering areas, 4. Loading and delivery areas should be located plantings, bicycle parking, or other appropriately to minunize their visibiliry, amenities between or adjacent to avoid pedestrian/ loading zone activity buildings; conflicts, and minimize potential circulation, noise, and lighring conflicts. Screening these
areas with landscaping, buildings, fences or
valls is encouraged.

5. Corner and mid- block buildings should be
oriented towards the public right-of-way and
should be designed to achieve the following: I II M.
f l
here feasible and desirable, driveway
entrances and stacking lanes should be
separated from public pedestrian spaces
Photo Ea•anrple 5
and crossings.

Encouragingg rthe zng arecr.r ln operr. rpaie.r
C. Refuse, Storage& Equipment lreas
Minimize escessive building setbacks
that detract from the streetscape, or The design and placement of refuse containers, oprimize escessive setback areas by service areas, loading docks, and similar facilities providing disunctive landscaping within shall be considered as part of the o Terall site the setback; design of a project. In general, these uses should be located as to not interfere or detract from
Building elevations should consider the circulation, parl:ing, and adjacent uses, and in human- scale design elements on ground most cases should be screened from vie v. floor facades and specifically at builciing
entsances. The following design guidelines apply to all development areas of the Central Lathrop

3. Parking areas should be designed for Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment Plan Area as circulation efFiciency and safety of a11 users: it relates to refuse, storage and equipment areas:

Large parking areas should be screened
from vie v and placed away from major
rights- of-way, behind buildings, or
obscured with landscape treatments,
such as berms, tall shxubs, and trees;
Landscaping should be provided in
parking areas as specified by- the
landscaping section in this chapter;
Pedestrian pathways and walkways,
clearly marked with enhanced paving
material, should be provided through
parking areas as direct routes to building
entries.

Yage 7- 5
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Seven: Design GuideGncs

1. Trash/ recycling enclosures and service and 3. Trash and outdoor storage that is visible loading docks areas should be sufficiently from upper stories, arterial roads or freeways sized to accommodate the site' s needs, but should be screened with trellis or other located in areas as to not interfere vith on- horizontal cover and should be consistent site circularion and parking; vith the architectural style of adjacent buildings. Furthermore, trash enclosures
should be designed— through colors,
materials, details, and/ or forms, that serve to
compliment associated building design for a i G l I
I' f tiy the paYttCular bLuldtng COmplex lt ServeS. z Il 6'` , ' d. b! r", 7 !. z,
s'-.;.
y; 4. Trash and outdoor storage facilities are
required to include a covered roof and sewer
drain as described in die Public orks
Storm vater Standards.
k
i
jbr; Mpb+ r " 9' Cif°i i, l' Ili
i+ t} df+ a{ t h
Pl oto E anrple 6 j I ' I l i
Sai cre rtly, ritie! loarling do k,r

2. T"rash and outdoor storage facilities should
be placed away from public streets and/ or
screened from view with materials consistent
to adjacent building ekteriors or other mature
plantings; and
t
w° s, i59 t
sa p r;
P ioto Example 7
dl.: . ,.;
Screeized oaatdoor. rtornge area laced aiv fr m pz blic. rtreetr. Pboto Exarrrple 8 Eiaclosed refu.re rrea. r
Yage 7- 6
entral Lathcop Specific Plan— Phasc 2 Amendment Chapter Scvcn: llesign G uidelines D. Landscaping stall, all plant material and irrigation shall be kept eighteen inches from the curb, or confined to lo v
The intent of the landscape design is to provide groundcover or lawn, to allow for car overhang continuity throughout the CLSP- 2 Amendment and doar swing. 'I'rees should provide a shade Plan Area. Landscaping guidelines will specify canopy, reducing heat island effect: a sustainable standards for streetscape, public space, and site planning measure. It is recommended that parl ing lot design within the development area. 50° shade be provided within vehicular parl ing Through the use of deciduous and evergreen lots. (Estimated shade diameter is projected at 15 plant material, year- round interest will be giaen 5rears from tiine of planting.) Vehicular parl ing to the site cith an evenlp layered plant design. lot shade trees shall conform, at a minimum, to This layered plant design will screen or diminish standards and requirements shown in Chapter adverse views and utilities. Plant materials should 17. 9 Landscape and Screening Standards of the be easy to maintain while attractive and di rerse. Lathrop l lunicipal Code.

Designers shall emphasize the use of low-water
use plants vith a lush character and vibrant Irrigation and water efficiency/ conservation is colors. mandatory in accordance with the" Model Vi/ater Efficient Landscape Ordinance." Irrigation
The streetscape within the CLSP- 2 Amendment systems should be designed to ensure the Plan l rea will be unified through a consistent efficient use of water and avoidance of overspray palette of ground cover, shrubs, and street trees. and overwatering. To help ensure an efficient The street tree will create a
canopy along all ittigarion system, plants should be grouped in public streets to increase aesthetics of the project hydro- zones, which is a combination of plants while providing shade and creating a walkable vith similar vater needs. The use of low- water development. Street trees size rcquired at time of narive and adaptive plants is highly encoutaged. planting will be determined during the Site Plan All landscape areas must be irrigated with an Review process for each de elopment. Street automatic irrigauon sy stem controlled by a timer. trees shall be centered in the parkway strip or Use of drip irrigation is encouraged where planted at least 4' behind the sidewalk. A miy of pracrical and most effective, especially in shrub eaergreen and deciduous trees is encouraged as and tree areas. primary and accent tree options. ' here it is
determined by Ciry staff that more screening is Where feasible and desirable, drainage and water required, an increase in e ergreen tree locations quality measures should be used in on-site may be required. landscape areas. Using landscape strips and medians for percolation, drainage swales, and
The landscaping of public spaces should be rain gardens is highly encourlged. Use of manj, carefully considered to attract visitots. Trees with sustainable landscape techniques is highly a consistent canopv should be used in areas recommended and can result in substantial vhere shade is desirable. In general, the maintenance cost savings. landscaping of public spaces should complement
the other features and atnenities of the area, 7'he following design guidelines apply to all becoming a backdrop to pedestrian activities. development areas of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 as it relates to landscaping:

Parl ing lots will have drive aisles and paYking
aisles delineated through parl ing lot medians and 1. Landscaping should be used to define planter strips. Ground cover, shrubs, and trees outdoor spaces, softening and will be planted within the medians and planter complementing structures, and should also strips, where feasible and practical. ' hen a be used for utilitarian qualities:
median or planter strip is adjacent to a parking
Yagc 7- 7
Centr2l l,athrop Specific I' lan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Seven: Design Guidelincs Become a backdrop to pedestrian
outdoor gathering places;
Screening parking, loading, storage, and
equipment areas;
Provide shade and enhancement to the
streetscape, parking lots, and pedestrian
outdoor gathering places; and
Directional, defining entries and
pedestrian ways. I i Y '''
i

2. Landscaping and trees should be employed
in parking areas to break up espanses of
hardscape and to minimize heat island effect;
I ' yw
u' '; r1 ' Photo Ex tnrple 10
i
r' Pre.re roed l,ratarra! L' egetation
a

5. Conser- ation and efficient use of water is at
the forefront of the Central Lathrop Specific
Plan - Phase 2 landscaping objectives.

Landscaping and irrigation shall comply with
the Cit Municipal Code Section 17. 92. 060
ater Efficient Landscape Ordinance" and
the following guidelines:

Plants should be selected and grouped
according to their maintenance and
Photo lainple 9
water use profile. In all cases, lowL.a rdre rpi rg ijr parking are rs maintenance and drought tolerant plantings are highly encouraged;

3. ` Uhere feasible and desirable, mature trees
and plantings should be maintained and Planting of turf areas should be kept at a incorporated into the landscape design; minimum. A ma: imum of 10% of the total landscaped site area may be

4. Natural and eYisting vegetation should be irrigated tur£ Drought-tolerant ground preserved where possible and incorporated
covers and shrubs are lo ver maintenance
into the ne v
landscaping. Retention and and seen as more desirable;
detention areas should be planted to create
the appearance of natural vegetation. Careful rlll landscaped areas should be designed selecrion of plant types is necessary to ensure for maximum water efficiency and sun i- a1 and be compatible with the proper irrigated through an automatic irrigation functioning of the drainage system;
s stem controlled by a timer. Nonpotable or recycled vater should be used to the extent feasible;
Pagc 7- 8
Central], athrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2: lmendment Chaptcr Seven: llesi,m Guidelines Use alternative and porous paving
opuons for pedestrian pathways and
non- vehicular and bicycle circulation to
maximize infiltration of ater runoff;
Curb, header boards, pavers, and other
materials should be used to minimize
water run- off and define landscaped
areas; and
Water features should be designed for
maximum maintenance and water
efficiency.

6. ` here feasible and desirable, landscape
strips and medians should be programmed Pboto F.xample 19 for the treatment and conveyance of water
I-anrl.rc pe baa er at errtry mofrunrerrtntion
run- of£ I.andscaping used for percolation, alls & Fences drainage swales, and rain gardens are highly
encouraged. alls and fences in the Plan Area are intended to provide screening between projects and adjacent

7. r landscape buffer shall be provided along uses where necessary, helping to define edges of Dos Reis Road, across from eYisung and arterial and collector streetscapes and providing proposed sensitive receptors. The landscape security to propertv. It is anticipated that there buffer is intended to soften the transition will be limited use of valls, e cept where needed from non- industrial uses to the future for sound attenuation or where desired for entry industrial uses of the site. A 30 minimum features or for screening unsightly elements, such foot wide landscape buffer including 22 feet as trash areas. The material and design for the of landscaping with an 8 foot wide paved trail walls and fencing may vary throughout the will be provided in the public right- of-way development area, depending on location and behind the curb. 1n adciitional buffer will be specific project needs. However, the color and provided on private property to be designed materials of the valls through the CLSP- 2 Plan vith indi- idual development applications. l rea should be complimentary. Both masonry Refer to the Land Use chapter of this specific and wood fences are permitted in the Plan rea. plan amendment foY addirional information.

The following design guidelines apply Central
Lathrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 as it relates to
walls and fences:

L Walls and fences vill not be permitted ifthe
aren' t
necessary for noise attenuation,
specific screening, gateway, aesthetic, or
security purposes;
Pagc 7- 9
Central l,athcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendmcnt Chapter Seven: Design Guidelines Iu: e
k
Ys;`°.

P ' sV•
aL,
y#...

N
w
n a''. e 4 a; a% an .' L.... # NG. aEdr v ..

Photo Example 12
Site rvalls anrl fence. r

2. Tall walls and fences are discouraged along
arterial and collector roadways, as they
diminish the street scene. Fences and walls
should not esceed a matimum height of
seven feet, unless special screening and/ or
Pboto E.ua rple 13
security issues are demonstrated vhich I- rnris pe. rcree i rg at wall necessitates a higher fence. Low decorative 5. `' here security> fencing is required, a or auto- screening walls, 2 to 4- feet in height, combination of solid and open grill vork is may ser- e to enhance a building area or encouraged. Barbed, razor, wire or similar streetscape, if tastefully designed. I iaximum fences shall comply- with LMC Section wall heights should be inclusive of fill from 17.) 2. 070. e
isting ground ( ie berms). 1t locarions
where industrial land use is proposed 6. t the interface between Dos Reis Regional adjacent to sensitive Yeceptor land use ( like Park and the adjacent industrial site a shall along Dos Reis Road), an 8 ft. masonry wall include a masonry wall for screening. for special screening shall be installed;
I. Public Spaces and Pedestrian menities

3. `' alls and fences, used at property frontages
or for screening, should be designed as an It is the intent ofthe public spaces and pedestrian eitension of a building' s architecture; top amenities section to promote usable public caps on masonry walls and tubular steel gathering spaces ariented toward pedestrian fences are encouraged. Self- clinging or users that function as an amenit- to the supported vines shall be planted at regular deeelopment. These outdoor spaces should be intervals along walls to ensure coverage visually pleasing, appropriately scaled, and should within 5
years in order to discourage graffiti encourage greater activit- within each and soften the overall appearance of the wall; development area. r1s well as providing pedestrian- oriented features and amenities, these

4. Where long espanses of vall or fence are spaces should connect pedestrians vith the site unavoidable, articulation in the form of wall and surrounding uses. offsets or landscaping should be
unplemented; and An employee or public gathering place should be provided for appropriate projects in each
development area." I'he scale and program of the

Page 7 ends

Central l,athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 imendmcnt Chapter Seven: Desi n Guidelines space should be appropriate to the adjacent
building and rype of users. It is encouraged to site
these spaces in well-lit, shaded, secure, and
f`',`'`?
G ra,,
interactive areas where they can become an 3 a p
a. ,
integrated feature. fF „,.

Pboto Exarr le 1S
Ern loyee rvell-l eing area

2. ithin the Limited Industrial designation,
gathering places should be placed between or
adjacent to buildings to encourage employee
health and well-being.

Pl oto Exarrrple 14
Shaded er rployee break ai a
b} P9
n
The following design guidelines apply to all of
s
the Central Lathrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 as it
r , 5.
relates to public spaces and pedestxian amenities: r,,
w_ . r ;
L l n employee or public gathering and break
area spaces should be encouraged in W_
appropriate projects within each
s'`
Pl olo F m z le 16
deve lopment area. These amenities can E yrployee re rk area include, but are not limited to, small
recreation areas or other open space

3. Pedestrian connections should be
facilities. These areas will count toward the established within projects and development landscape requirement desi nated for each areas, where logical and practical. r reas for land use district. respite for users should be encouraged.

U. I.ighting& Furniture
Iighting is an unportant element in the landscape
and should be used to contribute to a safe and
attracuee environment. Natural areas vill need
little light while street intersections will require
illumination levels safe for pedestrian crossings.

Lighting is also used to reinforce the
development' s overall design theme and create a
consistent sense of place by adding a common,
Pagc 7- 11
Central I, athrop Speciftc Plan— Phase 2/ lmendment Chapter Secen: llesign Guidelincs themaric element that is repeated along all major 5. Architectural lighting may be used to roadways. Streetlighting within public right of highlight special features on or around the way shall comply with the Ciry of Lathrop design building, or to illuminate key entrances or construction standard details. The height of other areas of access; lights vill vary depending on application. Light
standards will typically be higher along roadways 6. All lighting should utilize cut-off type Fixture and will be lower in pedestrian areas. High to minimize visibility from adjacent areas and Efficiency lighting is required within all buildings should be the appropriate size and height as well as on the eYterior. Outdoor lighting shall given the actieities for which they- are be provided for safety and security but shall be designed. Lighting used for pedestrian minimized from spilling over to adjacent connectors and gathering spaces should be properties. lo ver, bollard- type or footlight fiYtures and should not exceed 3- 4 feet in height;
Site furniture is encouraged in outdoor areas and
public spaces. The driving goal for the use of 7• ' here feasible and desirable, the use of landscape elements is to create enjoyable outdoor pedestrian amenities, such as benches, spaces and furnish comfortable amenities for drinl: ing fountains, lighting, and trash relaxation and leisure. Site furniture visible from receptacles, is encouraged. These elements public streets, plazas, and pedestrian linkages may be sited in public gathering places and as should be of a compatible style and design. respite along pedestrian connectors; and Fistures and furniture may vary in style, color,
and materials from this standard design if thev
8• I'he design of site lighting and fiirniture
are used in enclosed courty ards or other locations should be compatible throughout the CLSPwhere land uses require unique appeal. llesigners l mendment Plan rea. shall give emphasis to vandalism-resistant criteria
when selecung all site ftxtures and furniture.

Architecture
rlrchitecture should establish project identity and
The following design guidelines apply to all of
enhance the character of the development in the
the Central Lathrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 as it
CLSP- 2 mendment Plan r rea and the Citt of
relates to lighting and furniture:

Lathrop. i s a high- quality de elopment, a

1. Outdoor lighting should be specified and complementary design language should be designed consistent vith the zoning code for
established throughout the CLSP- 2 Amendment
this Plan r rea;
Plan: rea.

The architecture section is di ided into two subE terior lighting, including parking areas, should be architecturally inte ated with t11e
secrions:
sty-le oF the building and colors and materials Massing, Scale, and Form used; Stc-1e and Design Details

3. Parking lighting should be arranged to
provide uniform illumination throughout r1. I qassing, Scale and Form parking areas and should achieve a minimum
average of one foot- candle and a maximum The design objective of this section is to of three; encourage buildings that consider the human
scale, include aetive areas, and are compatible

4. Low energy LED lighting should be used for th adjacent development. Buildings should be streetscapes and parking lots. clustered to create compact, multi- story Yage 7- 12
Centr2l l,athcop Specific Ylan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter Seven: Design Guidclines structures that concentrate activities and related Parapets are encouraged to conceal Elat programmatic uses. Building height and massing roofs and to screen any rooftop should consider the surrounding contest. equipment, such as HV C units, from Projects should consider the human scale at the public view. Parapets should not exceed ground floor and at entries to buildings. 15°io or 1/ 3 of the supporting vall Buildings should take on varying form to increase height All parapets should feature threevisual interest and break up the monotony of dimensional cornice treatments. large structures. In addition, harizontal and
verrical wall arriculation should be encouraged D. Entries through the use of wall and second floor offsets,
recessed entries and windows, human- scale

1. Building entrances should be designed for
awnings, overhangs and arcades.
access both by patrons arriving via
automobile and b5- foot or bicycle;

2. Each entry should be protected from the
elements;
I tiU
a.

Photo Ex rmple % 7
I a.rar l i terert iia a 7iculatio r
B. Sty-1e and Design Details w= . „. _
P/ oto Exa r le 18
The objective of the style and design detail Ent y prote tedJibnr tie element.r. secrion is to establish clear direction in terms of
architectural styles and themes for future 3. Entries should create an architectural point development in the CLSP- 2 rlmendment Plan of interest using one or morc of the t1rea. The sty le and design of the buildings will following methods:
enhance the chaYacter of the Central Lathrop Wall recesses; SpeciFic Plan - I' hase 2 and set it apart as a
ciistinct and high- quality de relopment ' hile
Roof overhangs;
these guidelines do not prescribe a specific style
of architecture for the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Canopies; r rea, the objective is to allo v a diversity of styles vhile considering the conte t of surrounding Arches or arcades; development.

Columns; and/ or
C. Roofline
Signage.

1. Rooflines should be clearly articulated by
using the following feature:

Pa; c 7- 13
Centxal I,athcop Spccific Plan— Yhase 211mendment Chaptcr Seven: Design Guidelines ti
s
1 a^
y,j, P.i
F
z
t y„ k
r M— ^_
x
wl, y `~ K
I 1
w, w
a'
Photo Example 19 Photo Exa nj le 20
Ar hftectzrral pointr ofinterest at entryway.r Architectarral color, textarie arrd nrate ial changer rvith a et/ rojectio tr

4. Entries should incorporate vindows to
provide natural light and air; and 2. E terior materials should be durable and high quality to prevent degradation and for

5. 17ere feasible and desired, pedestrian the ease of maintenance:
amenities, such as seating, lighting, fountains,
sculptures, boulders, etc., should be Large eYpanses of smooth material such incorporated into entry designs as concrete should be broken up ` vith F. Materials& Colors
expansion joints, reveals, recesses, or
changes in testure and color;

1. All building elevarions must include
architectural patterns that include at least ( 2)
Large espanses of highly reflective
of the following elements: surface and miYror glass exterior walls should be avoided to prevent heat and
Color change; glare impacts on the adjacent public
streets and properties;
Texture change;
Colors should be compatible throughout
I Taterial change; and/ or the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area, while allo ving for individualin- to each
wall offset, reveal, or projecrion of at development area. r1 varied and rich least 12 inches in depth. color palette is encouYaged, although color should not be used as an attentionseeking decice. Colors should be used to enhance a building' s
presence and
integrate other materials throughout the
project;

3. Building trim and other accent elements may
featuYe brighter colors, if desired, but should
alway s complement the base color.

Pagc 7- 14
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chaptcr Seven: Design Guidelincs q 3. Window and door openings should be
framed with trim, or recessed a minimum of
r,::;.;
4 inches from the building face;
E

4. Where feasible and useful, use operable
x windows foY maximum environment control
and passive heating/ cooling options
G. Facades

1. Facades of 100- feet or more in length are
Photo Example 21 encouraged to break- up the elevation using Gontra.rt irr reflecti e. rurface. r— pop of c•olor tiim accent.r one ofthe following technlques:

F. ' indows & Doors
all and/ or second floor offsets; or

1. Ground tloor, storefront-type glazing for
display purposes along public faCade
Recessed entries or windows.
frontages should be used as appropriate to
Facades that face public streets should create
enhance the esterior wall area;
visual interest by using one or more of the

2. ' indows and/ or other appropriate builciing following techniques:
features should be used on upper levels to
Human- scale elements, like awnings or
break up large wall areas and create visual
overhangs;
interest;
i Arcades or recesses; or
a;% i
i
Entry areas.
r
m,_ ,
r
y
y" £ a...
s
Photo F.xcarrrple 23
Hr+inan-. rcale nlvuirtg element
Phota Exarrrple ZZ
t'' in low placei rext rat zpper• level.r-- r-errting r i.raral interert ivit{i H. Slgnage architeitasral elemenl.r

1. Signage shall comply with Lathrop Municipal
Code Chapter 17. 84 Signs;
Pagc 7-] 5
Central], athrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amendment ChapTer Seven: Desi, m Guide( incs

2. Color and material opCions for signs should
always complement the architectural style of
the building;

3. Signage should be scaled appropriately for
its given location;

4. Building signage should be located near the
related business entry, or as identity feature
as seen from major travel waps;
6 Photo Ex•ample 25
Lotv profile nrorrr inent, cigrr

8. Signage for pedestrian and birycle vayfinding is encouraged; and

9. Lighting is allo ved to illuminate signage at
night. Lighting should be designed
c r' appropriately as to not create hazardous glare
t: a for pedestrians bicyclists, and vehicles. Both
externally and internally illuminated signage
is allowed.

10. r1t key entry areas along De Lima Road,
Manthey Road, and future Street A, projectPhoto Ex rrple 2= wide decorative entry features and Mon merrtrigirage monument signs shall be located to identify

5. Signing should maintain a visual consistency
and enhance the image of the Central
throughout CLSP-? Amendment Plan rea.

I-athrop Specific Plan - Phase 2 Area.
hen more than one sign is required for a Developers and builders of the project shall given business or area, both signs should ork vith City Staff to establish appropriate maintain visual comparibiliry with one
locations and criteria foY this project- wide
another;
monumentation and signage.

G. Signage teyt should be kept to a minimum 11. On- site directional signs at gateway s and and scaled appropriately- for placement and entries are encouraged to be pro rided for legibilit- purposes;
both pedestrian and vehicular visitors to the
site.

7. ' all signs, monument si ms, and low-profile

12. Suggested Gateway Sign locations are shown freestanding signs are encouraged; on Figure 7. 1.

Pagc 7- 16
Central l,athrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 c mendment Chaptcr Seven: Design Ciuidelines Figure 7. 1- Gateway Sign Locations
GENTRAL LATHROP SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2 AMENDMEN`T
r' '..
ri °°£
r , , a z >"
di i ` `"''
yr
i at
t,
yr .
ab s
t fro y, i
2 Ur
t, ;
i ' r g
9 y, .
k ',''
s,
a " e' a r +, " "
ut: r a i . x= "'. , .
ti r
ti
r
r Y ' K h '
y J
F
1 Y h 1
nf . .
ct yA>r A,
k a,
x ; ; ':
sr Eer a
iflt fl iY. l 1t t Y r rr r ir r
am
V
f
j r ,
C
4Q.

GA ENJAY STGt

DE LIMA ROAD
S•,g°,..,.

STREE7 D
t
y '_
i' f
x

DOS REIS ROAD
r s ar . r r s
c ..

G; ENtAY SIGN GATLVr'AY SIGN z
NORTH OF D05 REIS AOAD
v2
a
spRR rarr wav
fr
r'
x e p u.+
a
i
G' p'
9^ .
m r ; „<
v
F
a
r
4 . x
a
r
w. m«+
x' ",,'''
w. a
sT -%,
cc n
SUGGESTED GATEN` AY SIGN LOCATION
Fi ure 7. 1
NOii T N
s. GATEWAY SIGN LaCATIONS
Y Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
S
Lathrop, Ca
Pa e 7- 17
Central I.athcop Specific Plan— Phase 2 r mendmcnt Chaptcr}? ight: Implcmcntation Chapter Eight: Implementation
Itttroduction development located between Dos Reis
Road and De Lima Road.

I'his chapter describes the CLSP- 2 mendment
implementation, including project review Muraicipal Code procedutes, development agreements, specific
plan amendment procedures, enforcement, The City of Lathrop Municipal Code has been mitigation monitoring and other revie v and amended to include special zoning districts for approvals required during the implementation of the purpose of defining for each parcel the the CLSP- 2 Amendment. permitted, conditionally permitted, and administratively permitted land uses that may be
Specifrc Plan Implementation developed vithin the CI.SP- 2 area, the process pursuant to which such land uses are approved
The City would implement the CLSP- 2
and the development standards applicable to
l mendment in accordance with the terms and each land use. conditions of several related planning and
program documents, including, in particular, the Drctijza e Plan Implernerttation landowner development agreements, the project
CEQA analy>sis, the CLSP- 3 Amendment Design 1 detailed drainage report, including hj drologic Guidelines ( this document), the City of Lathrop and hydraulic calculations and focused General Plan, Yelated 1 7aster Plans, and the geotechnical investigarions relating to soil and 7_,oning Ordinance. These documents provide ground vater conditions, vill be a critical part of guidance and direction and other vise inform the individual application for each project City discretion in the review and approval of proposed for development. future development within the CLSP- 2
clmendment Plan Area. 1'here are two disrinct watersheds within the CLSP- 2 mendment Plan rlrea. The parcels
CeratralLathrop Design G rrdelirres within each vatershed are linked by the drainage system and therefoxe, the detailed planning of
r s described in Chapter Seven, the CLSP- 2
any portion of a watershed must take into
Design Guidelines contain architectural, site considerarion the rest of the proposed planning, and l
ndscaping design principles and development within that watershed. guidelines.

If an individual development does not
City ofLathrop Gerteral Plart encompass the entire vatershed, the individual Development within the CLSP- 2 Amendment project must show that it will implement the requirements of the CLSP- 2 Amendment
I lan c rea must be consistent with the City- of
Lathrop C'seneral Plan.

Drainage Plan as described in the Utilities and
Drainage chapter.

The Lathrop General Plan requires
Conditional Use Permits for industrial Right to Farm Provisions t a; 8- t
Central], athrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amc idment h2pter E? iglit: [ mplementation The Plan r rea has eYisting agricultural uses of Specify ho v the Specific Plan and various l inds and intensities. As the Plan Area General Plan will be unplemented in builds out, several e
sting parcels on- site could connection with the Development remain in their existing agricultural state for some Agreement foreseeable period oftime. In order to ensure the
viabilit of the on- going agricultural uses, this I' rovide the terms for reimbursement in specific plan amendment shall require that a
the event that a developer provides
right- to- farm" provision be included as a
part of advance funding for facilities which have
any subsequent stage in the land entidement community benefit, process. r long these same lines, an entitlement
application or document shall mandate full right- Provide for adequate public facilities for to- farm disclosures at point- of- sale of lots within each project phase in a timely manner, the Plan 11rea. This provision shall include all
properties on site which maj- be impacted or Shorten the approval process baffected by on- going farming operations. consolidating and coordinating various discretionary approvals, and
Development Agreements
Subject to the Specific Plan, the property owners
Specify the monetary responsibilities of
and the City may execute Development
the developers.
tlgreements in accardance with Government
CityReviewProeess
Code and local ordinance. The Development
Agreements will set forth the infrlstructure Correntzrnity Developirtertt Department Revieav improvements, public dedication requirements,
landscaping amenities, and other contributions
Subsequent to adoption of the CLSP- 2
to be made b a
property owner in return for mendment, indi- idual project applications w-ill guarantees by the City that certain land uses and be reviewed to determine consistency vith the densities in effect at the time of esecution of the specific plan amendment and other regulatory agreement vill not be modified. documents. Applications such as site plan review applications, use permits, conditional use
oth the Cit and the project sponsors vould permits, variances and the like, will be revie ved commit themselves to proceed vith the terms of using established Community Development the agreement. The City can agree to process Department and Planning Division procedures. future development applications in accordance
with the Plan and la vs that were in e istence Development applications will be submitted to when the agreements were made. The City then the Ciry of LathYop' s Planning Division. The commits to maintaining its planning or zoning Planning Division will conduct an initial review statutes related to the developments for an
of the applicauon for completeness and
agreed- upon period of time. In return, the consistency with the adopted Specific Plan, as developer/ applicant agrees to develop according
vell as other ordinances and standards. The
to an agreed- upon time schedule or commit to applicant vill be notified vithin 30 day s of the other measures which the Cit might otherwise initial submittal date of any deficiencies that must have no authoritq to requiYe e
be recrified to deem the application complete. If
developer/ applicant to perfarm. the applicant or the City believes that an ilmendment to the Specific Plan is warranted, an
Generall, Development r
greements include the 3mendment to the Specific Plan may be following provisions, or similar variations: requested in accordance with the 1lmendment Procedures. ' I'he request must provide adequate
Pa; c 8- 2
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 Amendment Chapter F,ight: [ mpLementation justification. The application may also be subject Environmental IZevietv to environmental review as discussed in the
following section.
1'he EIR certified for the 2022 General Plan
established a program level environmental
Conditional U.re Perrr it.r CUP review for development within the City including the CLSP-? Amendment Plan Area and supports
Per the City of Lathrop General Plan, conditional the Amendment Individual project applications use permits will be required for any development will be reviewed for consistency with the 2022 within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan rlrea UP EIR If consistency is determined and the located bet veen Dos Reis Road to the south and project meets the criteria established in Section De Luna Road to the north. r1 CUP may also be 15162 of the CEQl guidelines no subsequent required vithin the CLSP- 2 area if the proposed environmental review is necessary. The intent of use requires a CUP per the Lathrop l lunicipal the EIR associated with the specific plan is to Code. cover all development consistent with this
document, stream- lining the permitting and
Site Plarr/ Are•{iteetural De ign Bevieaa
review process.

Uenerally, all industrial projects within the
CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area will be subject to The City of Lathrop Community Development Department is the lead agency in processing the Site I lan/ r rchitectural Design Review by the revie v of development projects within the Plan City; design review shall be implemented before Area. Upon receipt of an application the Ciry issuance of building permits. Also, all public unprovements ( such as landscape plantings, shall initiate an initial study and environmental street and entry signs, lighting, or special paving) reeie v of the project which may require the are subject to Site Plan/ rlrchitechiral Design preparation of additional environmental or Review. All Site Plan/ Architectural Design engineering studies to address site- specific Revie v
procedures vill be conducted in
concerns.
compliance with Chapters 17. 100 and 17. 104 of
The foregoing discussion details the initial
the Lathrop I Zunicipal Code.
project review and environmental review
PaaG/ ic I nprovemejtt Plan.r
submittal procedures. Projects submitted for
consideration will be revie ved for consistencv
The on- site and off-site public improvements urith established development standards and necessary to serve the CLSP- 2 area need to be design guidelines of the Specific Plan. specifically- designed. ' I'he applicants shall
prepare for City review and approval Public Habitat Conservation Plan Improvement Plans, consisting of detailed
en ineering designs and documents for all All individual project applications must comply vith the San Joaquin County Multi-Species
uriliries necessary to develop the land uses
Habitat Conservarion and Open Space Plan
identified in the Specific Plan. These plans shall
SJI ZSCP). The SJMSCP, prepared by San
include an infrastructure sequencing program Joaquin Counry and other participating agencies, that will allow orde l development throughout
protects special- status plants and wilcilife and
the Specific Plan area. The sequencing program their habitats, while allo ving for planned gro vth shall prioritize roads, water, sewer, storm in the County. This protection is accomplished drainage and other urilities that must be in place by, 1) idenrifying important habitats and habitat prior to specific levels of development. Refer to
features to aid in the development of protection Section 633 for additional details regarding areas, and 2) establishing a funding mechanism infrastructure phasing. through vhich project proponents can provide

Page 8 ends

Centeal Lathrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2/ lmendmcnt Chapter 1? ight: [ mplementation replacement habitat vhile enabling them to meet physical character of the plan area as their no net loss of habitat value goals. Project envisioned by this CLSP- 2. proponents as part of this Specific Plan will be
required to participate in the SJMSCP by Any change that could significandy contributing appropriate impact fees and increase environmental impacts. implementing mitigation as idenrified by the
SJI ZSCP. All mendments to CLSP- 2 shall be consistent
vith the City' s General Plan. Major amendments
Amendments to CLSP-2 may therefor require an accompanying General Plan Amendment and Zoning Ordinance
r n applicant for a specific development proposal revision. Generally, the process for amending may- request amendments to the CLSP- 2 to the CLSP- 2 Amendment is similar to that for respond to changing circumstances and
amending the Cit' s General Plan, with the main
conditions. Amendments to the CLSP- 2 should difference that there is no limitation of the be categorized as minor or major. This
number of amendments that may- be approved in
determination is to be made by the Communiry
any one y
ear. The materials and documents
Development Director or his/ her designee. The
necessary to process a major amendment
Community Development Director or his/ her application should be consistent with those designee shall administratively make a written
outlined in the City' s Discretionary Permit Form
determination as to whether or not a requested for Rezones/ Amendments. r detailed amendment is major or minor. The Community justification statement shall be submitted which Development Director' s decision may be
explains in detail whp an amendment to the
appealed to the Planning Commission. CLSP- 2 mendment is wartanted. r111 Major. AmendmentYequirements of CEQr1 will be applicable. rlpplication fees associated with the major
The follo ving are examples of what could be
amendment shall be submitted to cover all
considered major amendments: processing costs. Major amendments shall require City Council approval, with a
Introduction of a ne v land use category
recommendation forwarded by the Planning
not specifically discussed in this CLSP- 2.

Commission.

Significant changes to the distribution of
VlinorAmendr ent.r
land uses, major acreage changes of land
An amendment shall be considered a minor
uses, or other changes affecung land use
amendment vhen it is determined that it does
which may substantially affect the key not have a significant impact on the charactcr of planning concepts set for this in this
the plan or the envitonment The following are
CLSP- 2.
examples of what could be considered minor
amendments:

Significant changes to the collector street
system that would substantially alter the
Change in the configuration of a
land use or circulation concepts set Forth
particular CLSP- mendment land use
in this CLSP- 2.
which does not significantly- alter its
relationship to other land uses or
Changes to design guidelines and/ or
compromise the concept and principles
deeelopment standards which, if
of the CLSP- 2 Amendment.
adopted would substantially change the
Pagc 8- 3
Central lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 f\ mendment Chapter F? ight Implement rion Minor changes to land uses which result OverviewofDevelopmentApproval in minor acreage changes of land uses, or Ptoeess
other changes altering land uses, which
do not significantly affect the key The approval of any development project within planning concepts or principles set forth
CLSP- 2 mendment Plan rlrea shall be based on
in this CLSP-? mendment. its consistency with the I.athrop General Plan, the CLSP- 2 Amendment, the CLSP- 2
Changes to the collector street system l mendment Design Guidelines, and the Lathrop and alignments that do not significantly 7oning Code. In addition, each application for a alter the intended land uses or circulation
development project within the CLSP- 2
functioning as set forth in this CLSP-?
mendment Plan Area will be evaluated to assess
rlmendment. the applicability of environmental mitigation measures included in the 2022 Lathrop General
The relocation or reconfiguration of Plan FIR to determine whether future open space that is not less in acreage size environmental revie v is required under CEQ than specified minimums in the CLSP- 2
I'ublic Resources Code Sections 21166; 21083. 3.
mendment.

See also CEQr Guidelines Sections 15162-
15164, 15182, and 15183).

Changes to design guidelines
architectural types and materials,
Development projects within the CLSP- 2
landscape materials, etc.) and/ or
Amendment Plan rlrea are subject to the
development standards that do not standard permit and approval requirements of substantially change the physical the City of Lathrop' s Zoning and Subdivision character of the CLSP- 3 mendment Urdinances, except as modified by this Specific development as envisioned.

Plan Amendment and related approvals.

Clarification and interpretation of land
Site Plan Review Conditional Use
uses. Permits, Varrances, and otherpermits
forindividual development projects
Any change to the CLSP- 2 Amendment SiLe Plare rc itectzrral De.cign Reviezv d at would not significantl increase
environmental impacts. Generally, all industrial projects within the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area will be subject to
tlpplications for minor amendments shall be Site Plan/ r rchitectural Design Review by the submitted to the Planning Division and shall City-; design review shall be implemented before include a description of the requested issuance of building permits. Also, all public amendment, a
justification statement, and the improvements ( such as landscape planungs, application processing fee ( determined by the street and entry signs, lighring, or special paving) City Council). Minor amendments shall require are subject to Site Plan/ r rchitectural Design Community Development Director approval. Revie v. 111 Site Plan/ Architectural Design Revie v
procedures will be conducted in
n amendment or amendments to this CLSP- 2
compliance with Chapters 17. 100 and 17. 104 of
Amendment shall not require a concurrent the Lathrop Municipal Code. general plan amendment unless City Staff
determines that the proposed specific plan Conditiortal L se Pernit3 amendment would not be consistent with the
General Plan goals, objectives, or policies.

Pagc 8- 5
Cen[ ral Lathrop Specific I' lan— Phase 2 Amendment hapter]. i; ight: Implementation T'he development of certain land uses within the The implementation program for the CLSP- 2 CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area or within certain r mendment is designed to allo v development of locations may require a conditional use permit the CLSP- 2 mendment Plan Area and CUP) based on the Lathrop ' Loning Orciinance. construction of supporting public improvements Issuance of conditional use permits are governed to be phased. Phasing is a critical component of by Lathrop Municipal Code, which specifies the the CI.SP- 2 Amendment for the following application process, including the submittal of reasons:
plans, processing fees and related information as
may be needed. CUPs are subject to apublic It allows the backbone infrastructure hearing held by the Planning Commission that necessary to support development to be must make findings prior to appro- a1. constructed and financed in manageable increments on an as- needed basis.

The 2022 Lathrop General Plan, I,and Use
Element, Implementation Action, LU- S. f, b., iu., It assures the construction of backbone h., requires that all development projects infrastructure will stay ahead of the proposed north of Dos Reis Road and south of development it serves while, at the same De Lima Road be required to obtain a
time, providing the fleYibility- to respond to
Conditional Use Permit ( CUP), which shall be changes in market conditions. subject to discretionary revie v by the City
Council. It is more efficient because it minimizes the
extent to which costly public improvements
arianee. r requiring on- going maintenance will be
constructed only- to sit unused unul
In some instances due to special circumstances development occurs. applicable to a property, Chapter 17. 120 of the
Lathrop i Tunicipal Code authorizes the Planning It provides an opportunity- to coordinate land Commission to consider and grant " major" secured infrastructure financing more closely ariances to specific development standards as vith market absorption resulting in higher set forth in the zoning code. " I'he Community lien to value ratios.

Development Director may consider and grant
minor" variances. Chapter 17. 120 of the The CLSPPhasittgPt' ogtam Municipal Code includes a discussion of major
and minor variances, submittal requirements and The CLSP- 2 i mendment land uses, and the requirements for a
public hearing. backbone infrastructure ( refer to Chapter Sis fvr details), are designed to be developed in t vo
Bcrildind, Gradin ancl Denzolitiorr Perrnits primary phases, with the possibility of multiple sub phases. The two primary phases of
1 builciing permit is required prior to the de relopment are sho vn in Figure 8- 1. Both construction, alteration, or renovation of
development phases within the CLSP-2
builciings, including interior unprovements.
mendment Plan rea rely on infrastructure
Grading permits are required for the e cavation, that was constructed to the south within the fill or moving of dirt in ehcess of 50 cubic yards original CLSP Phase 1 Plan Area such as the on any building site vithin the CLSP- 2 area. underground utilities and pump stations.

Issuance of a demolition permit by- the Lathrop Reunbursements for the oversized utilities I3uilding Department is required prior to removal 7thin the original CLSP Phase 1 Plan rea will of existing buildings.
be paid through the City of Lathrop' s Capital
Facility Fee ( CF Program.

Phasing
i a; s-
Central I. athrop Spccific Plan— Phase 2 Amcndmcnt haptez l. ight: Implementarion The first phase of the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan complete so long as a demonstration is made, Area is a single parcel adjacent to Dos Reis to the satisfaction of the Public ' orks Road near the intersection of Uolden L' alley Director or City Engineer, shocving that an Parkway that is appro imately 90 acres. The interim alternate solution can be constructed, second phase is the remaining area vithin the and that flooding will not occur. Projects CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area. Development shall comply with NPDES standards. phasing may be further divided into sub- phases
as market conditions and infrastructure r1 developer may also request that changes be financing options warrant. The timing of the made to the backbone infrastructure required to ultimate buildout will depend upon market serve the CLSP- 2 ( as such infrastructure conditions. requirements are set forth in Chapter Six) in order to respond to changing conditions of
Infrastructure Administration development or the availabiliry of new r developer may request either changes to the
technologies to address the infrastructure needs
initial infrastructure phasing plan shown in created by development. Such changes in the Figure 8. 1 or the establishment of sub phases.
backbone infrastructure plan are e: plicidy
Changes to the inival infrastructure phasing plan
allo ved without amendment to the CLSP-?
or the establishment of sub phases are explicitly
provided a developer demonstrates, to the
allowed without amendment to the CLSP- 2
satisfaction of the Public Works Director and
provided a developer demonstrates, to the Community Development Director, that the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and proposed changes meet certain performance or Community Development Director, that le el of service standards prescribed in the infrastructure impro- ements necessary to project development agreements or, vhere adequately serve the phased development will be applicable performance or level of service provided in atimely manner and will be sufficient standards are not prescribed, results in a leael of if no further development occurs. For e ample:
service that is at least comparable to the level of
sercice that vould have been provided had the
Roadways may be constructed at less than changes not been proposed. full width, or full length so long as the
interim roadways are functional and safe and
meet City improvement standards as
determined by the Public Works Director or
City Engineer;
Certain segments of the cater and/ or
recycled vater systems may be deferred until
needed to serve a particular phase or sub
phase so long as adequate looping and
pressure are provided as determined by the
Public` Uorks Director or Cit Engineer.;
As it relates to stormwater runofF from
inciividual developments, interim drainage
solutions, such as temporary retention basins
may be employed until off-site £acilities ( i.e.,
permanent detention pipes, pump stations,
force mains and/ or outfall structures) are
Ya; c 8- 7
Centra] Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2/ lmendmcnt Chapter i ight: [ mple cnentation Figure 8. 1- Phasing Map
CENTRAL LATHROP SPFCIFIC PLA1 1 PHASE 2 AMENDMENT
tu p t
Q x
Q QC t
r
O
t• s
w,:w* r
f, a s w.. r.! a
r lrr
s„ , Cp 5' Al
r
7 i 1
c. , "'`,,',` k r' f- 4
Y e' 1 C t'' >
n" t/' k
e ,
L'
DE EU RC) kt} t,7
r
L1- CI, S7R ET b
CL
op , LI-CL LI-C. , ".

G D{ S R IS ROF b C. SP PNASE.,
u u u r sir'"iL'i l"' i'il'i"sT'i r rr.
orF[ E
CE. SP PNASE
g
p LATHROF
PARk RESiR.' YTIALi C( 3VIM1IERCIriL+ HICt[ € 4AYEll USE sc aoL
SP'ARTAN WAY LATNROF R AD r
1 0.....+ t` t
a
C,f, y s
i S*S/,R. ro 5,`* ,;:
ta`
Y r
O 1 Q'
y"' y i f
irlr yrwu w u r r rr
ss"', i
r 1
i
b
r,
4 ' ,
a
g
r, „ , 3
vk" a1
w°, p,
a` ;
M
I
iww u rd

RIVER ISLAN DS PKWY LOUISEAVENIJE
I.F.CiF,tv€ 3
Phase I( Within CLSP- 2 Ameaslment Plan Area)
Phase 2( N' ithin CLSP- 2 Amrndm nt Plun Area)

N O R T M
CLSP- 2 Ameodment Plan Area 6oundary Figure 8. 1
N.T. S. CLSP- I PlanAria& umfary pu/, ( j T( t ( A T3
1 11171J11r V 1Y1L- Lr
C Central Lathrop Specific Plan- Phase 2 Amendment
E
Lathrop, Ca
z. s.

Yagc 8- 8
Central Lathrop Specific Plan— Phase 2 lmendment Chapter li;ight [ mplement2rion Capitallmprovement and Operation/ operate and maintain all public facilities in the Mainterlance Responsibilitres CLSP- 2 with the eYception of those operated and maintained b- special service providers, such as
The responsibilities for capital unprovement the reclamation district maintaining the levees. provisions and ongoing operation and Refer to Table 8. 3 for a matris identifying the maintenance of public faciliues and sen-ices are ty pes of capital improvements and who is another unportant element of the overall CLSPxesponsible for the associated 2 implementation program. The City is to
operation/ maintenance.

Ta6le 8. 1: Capitallmprovement and Operation/ Maintenance I ee on ibilitieCapital Improvement Capital Improvement Operation and Maintenance Responsibility Responsibility
On- site strcets, alle s, and shared Dcvcloper[ ndividual ity for public stmets driveways( within CI, SP- 2 boundary) Property Owncr Owncrs ssociarion fot private streets
Off- site streets( outsidc of the CLSP? llcvelopec City oc other public agency boundary) f ir share as idenrified in Capital
acilih ee ro rram
Yotable Watec Distribution I acilities lleveloper City
ndividual Property Owner
Potablc Surfacc Watcr Supply South San Joayuin Irrigation l istrict Citv ity
Yotable Surface Water Treatment and South San foaquin Icrigarion District . i y Transmission I acilities Cin
Potablc Groundwatcr Supply Developer Cit
Cin
Potablc Groimdwatcr 1' reatmcnt llcvdoper ity
l acilities Cit
lastewatcr Collecrion } aciliries, llcvcloper ity
including pump statiou(,) Individual Propertp( huner
W stew terTreatmentl aeiliries Ciri City
Recycled Water Distribution l acilitics Developer Ciry
iry
Stocm llrain gc ( includcs all facilitics llcvcloper Ciry induding pipcs, pumps, and ba, ins) Individual Property Chvner Dry l'rilirie,( electrie, gas, commimication,) Utiliry Comp tnics Utility Cr>inpanies llcvcloper
ndividual Property( hvncr
Yublic Packs and Opcn Spacc, including City 1 City or> thcr PubGc enrity trails and public riglits- of-way llcvcLoper lndividua] landsca vi r. Yro ertc Owncr
l icc Station tnd li.yuipment athrop- I 4anteca E ire District l,athrop- Iblanteca} ire llvtitrict P licc Station and Gquipmcnt Ciry Citv
l, evec aud related easemc7its Keelamation District 17 Reclamation District 17 1] The potential trail along the levee adjacent open space shown on Figure 3. 10 will be funded by a capital unprovement fee program and constructed by the Cit.

Interpretation ofSpecific Plan Two of the prvnary objectives of the Central Lathrop Specific Plan-2 Amendment_are:

Amendments to the Specific Plan, including the
Design Guidelines, may be proposed by a
to maintain fleYibility and the ability of the
developer or property o vner or initiated by the Cit- and property o vners to react quickly to City, and shall be processed in accordance with changes in the marketplace, and the provisions described in this chapter.

Pagc 8- 9
Central]. athrop Specific Plan— Yhase 2 Amc idment hapter} i,ight Implementation to ensure, to the extent reasonably possible, those proposals by which a developer or the ultimate development of the CI.,SP- 2
land owner, in response to changing
Amendment at the overall level of intensity conditions of development or the of land use assumed in the CLSP- 2
availability of new technologies,
r mendment as approved. proposes to modify the initiallyapproved phasing plan provided b}- a The latter objective is intended to ensure the developer demonstrates, to the recovery of infrastructure investments made in satisfaction of the Public Works Director reliance on such assumed intensities and densiries. and the Community Development To achieve these two objecrives, the City intends Lllitector, that the infrastructure that the CLSP- 2 Amendment be interpreted and improvements necessary to adequately applied with as much flesibility and creativity- as is sene the developing portion of the site permissible vithin the reasonable scope of the will be provided in a timely manner. language of the CLSP- 2 Amendment. ' here Such proposals shall be deemed to be in these t vo objectives can be achieved through the substantial conformity with the CLSP- 2 reasonable interpretarion of the CLSP- 2 Amendment.
mendment, rather than through formal
amendment, such interpretarions is desirable and those by which a developer or land favorable over amendment. . ccordingly, formal o vner seeks to modify trail alignments, amendments shall not be necessary- where a fence locations or types, or similar specific development proposal is in " substantial CLSP- 2 Amendment features in conformity" w-ith the CLSP- 2 Amendment. common areas such as parks, trails, and other public amenities. Such proposal
The Community Development Director may shall be deemed to be in tiubstantial deterinine that a specific development proposal is
conformity- « ith the CLSP- 2
in substanrial conformit vith the CLSP- 2
r mendment unless the proposal is
Amendment, where, considering all aspects of the fundamentally inconsistent vith the proposal, the he/ she determines that the proposal development patterns envisioned in the will further the objectives and policies of the CLSP- 2 Amendment in terms of the CLSP- 2 Amendment and not obstruct their general locations of public amenities, attainment. Such as proposal need not be in trail locarions and alignments, and other perfect conformity with each and very- provision private land uses. of the CLSP- 2 Amendment policy, provided it is
consistent with the intent and basic objectives, those by which a developer or land policies, general land uses, and programs specified owner seeks to add new architectural in the CLSP- 2 r mendment. Where die styles oY planning concepts to the Design Community Development Director determines Guidelines. Such proposal might that a
particular development proposal is not in include, but not necessarily be limited to, substantial conformity w7th the CLSP- 2
changes in permitted builciing materials
mendment, the land ownet mal; ing the proposal or detailing, addiuonal design styles, has the right to appeal that deterirunation to the changes to plant palettes, and different Planning Commission and, if necessary, to the entry concepts. Proposal for such new Ciry Council. architectural styles or planning concepts shall be accompanied b5 a written
The following general categories of proposals description of the style, a schematic shall necessarily be determined to be in substanrial drawing, and an illustration of conformity with the CLSP- 2 r3mendment, being: architectural or planning elements that Pagc 8- 10
Central L, athrop Spccific Plan— Yhase 2 i\ mendment Chapter I; ight: [ mpicmentation typify the proposed style or concept.

Such proposal shall be deemed to be in
substantial conformity with the CLSP- 2
Amendment unless the new architectural
style or planning concept is
fundamentally inconsistent with the
aestheuc ision embodied in the original
Design Guidelines.

Specific Plan Consistency and
Enforcement
Any violation ofthe requirements of the CLSP- 2
Amendment as adopted by the City Council shall
be enforced in the same manner as a violation oE
the Municipal Code.

Pa; c 5- 11
Chapter Nine: Financing
Introduction backbone infrastructure, community facilities, and public services in the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan
Development in the CLSP- 2 r mendment Plan
rea. These mechanisms include but are not
Area is to be constructed and maintained through limited to:
a combination of financing mechanisms. This
chapter describes a
preliminary Financing Plan and Community F acilities Districts, Assessment identifies various financing options that may be Districts, Benefit Districts, Infrastructure utilized to unplement the CLSP- 2 Amendment. Financing Districts, and Joint Powers Arrangements for capital construction.

Financing Plan
The funding mechanisms for unprovements within Lighting and Landscape Illistricts, Community CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan Area may include
Facilities Districts, other maintenance
development impact fees and fee credits, private
assessment districts, and/ or user charges for
financing and reimbursements, Mello- Roos ongoing operation and maintenance purposes. community facilities and assessment districts, and
Principle 3 — The City may enter into a Joint
other public and private strategies. Po vers greement with the County, State, or an Once City staff, the Deeeloper( s), and other public
other appropriate governmental agencies that
entities agree upon specific improvements and
facilitates the financing of infrastructure
faciliries that need to be constructed in the CLSP- Provements. 2 r mendment Plan Area, appropriate funding Principle 4— The City shall establish appropriate mechanisms will be identified for each individual reimbursement mechanisms in the event that the
improvement and facility. CLSI 2 Amendment I lan r rea is required to pay The following principles shall govern the for oversizing of backbone infrastructure or public implementation of the Financing Plan unless
facilities beyond its faic share to the benefit of
other vise stated in an applicable Development existing or other new development in the Cit,y-.

Agreement:

Principle 5 — The City shall consider
Principle 1 — Ne v development in the CLSP- 2
Plementing fiinding and reimbursement
Plan Axea shall be required to pay its o vn way.
mechanisms to help facilitate the fair allocarion of
There shall be no cost to the City' s
esisting
backbone infrastructure and public facilities
residents for facilities or services necessary to ser re construction costs among the various landowners
the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan rea. All costs of
in the CLSP- 2 r mendment Plan Area.
municipal ser ices Yelated to the CLSP- 2, be they Principle 6 — The Cit will reasonably assist on- site ot off- site, shall be borne by the individual developers in the CLSP- 2 Amendment Plan rea
development.
in obtaining public financing for construction of
Principle 2 — The Cit will consider the both on- and off- site public improvements. establishment of appropriate public financing Principle 7 — The City may help fund public mechanisms to help finance the inirial
pro ements such as the levee adjacent open development and ongoing maintenance of 1' agc 9- 1
space benefiting the entire population of the City. facilities, and community services include, but are These improvements may be supplemented by not limited to:
including them in the Capital Improvement Fee
Program. Irafra tructure Financina Districts
Updates ofFinancingPlan
An Infrastructure Financing District ( IFD)
allocates a portion of new property taaes to pay for
Updates of the Financing Plan shall occur as capital itnprovements. Essentially, when ta signiFicant new informarion becomes available increment financing is utilized, subsequent regarding backbone infrastructure and public increases in taY revenues are set aside for the use facilities cost esumates, land uses, and funding of the financing district. A requirement of an IFD strategies. An administrarion- and- monitoring is that it is used only in areas that are substantially process shall be established to provide for underdeveloped. Formarion of an IFD and implementation and updaung of the Financing issuance of bonds is contingent upon the twoPlan. tllirds approval ofthe registered voters or property o vners in the area.

Financing/ Fiscal Measures
Facilities eligible per Government Code section
Various financing measures could be utilized to 53395. 3 for financing through an IFD include the implement both the development and the following facilities:
operation and maintenance of backbone
infrastructure, public facilities, and community High vay interchanges, bridges, arterial services. streets, parl ing facilities and transit facilities Before the recordation of any tentative tract map Sewage treatment and water reclamation vithin the boundaries of the CI, SP- 2, appropriate plants and interceptor lines financing mechanisms will be established to ensure
adequate funding of capital improaements is Y ater collection and treatment facilities for available at the time when the improvements need urban use to be constructed. Payment schedules and sources
of funds for the repayment of any proposed debt Flood control structures vill be identified for each such mechanism.

Child care facilities
Ongoing special tax and/ or assessment revenues
are to be earmarked to fund operations and Libraries
services in the CLSP- 2 r menciment Plan rea. The
level of public facilities and services in the CLSP- 2
Parks, recreauonal facilities and open space
r mendment Plan rlrea are to be of the same or
higher quality as presendy being provided Solid waste transfer and disposal facilities. elsewhere in the City. Such ongoing operational
concerns would include police and fire services,
park and road maintenance, and other municipal
services generally provided in a cin-.

The various mechanisms that may be used to
implement the development and the operation and
maintenance of backbone infrastructure, public
Pagc 9- 2
Capital Facilities Pee.c operarion and maintenance of street rights of ways and other public unprovements.

A range of Capital Facilities Fees ( CFF has been
established in the City of Lathrop. for funding of GeiteralO ligation Borad.r sewer, drainage, environmental mitigation,
transportation, culture and leisure, and municipal In 1986, vith the passage of Proposition 46, cities service facilities. Some of the backbone and counties were empowered with the right to infrastructure and public facility improcements issue general obligation bonds. General obligation that need to be constructed in the CI.,SP- 2 area fall bonds, which are repaid with revenues from into the CFF category. increased property tases, may be used to finance land acquisition and construction of capital
Special Taxe. r
improvements. A general obligation bond requires
a t vo- thirds voter approval.

Special ta es ty ically are generated through
formation of I lello Roos Community Facilities entte Bonc(s Districts or other similar mechanisms. F ormation
of Mello Roos Districts require approval by t o- Cities, counties, and some special districts can issue thirds of the property owners or the electorate bonds to finance facilities for revenue- producing within the proposed district boundary if there are enterprises such as water and sewer improvements, twelve or more registered resident voters. The golf courses, harbors, etc. The bonds are repaid special taYes generated from I Iello Roos Districts solely from the revenues generated by the financed may be used to pay for purchase, construction, faciliry. Revenue bond issuance may require voter espansion, improvement, operations and authorization.
maintenance, or rehabilitation of real property with
a useful life of five years or more. Alternarively, the j a rea Deve opmerzt Im act Fees
special taxes can be used to fund the debt service
Generally paid at the time of building permit,
for bonds that have been issued for financing of
development impact fees may be charged for
such improvements.
construction of facilities benefiting the affected
SpecralAssessments
area. nexus study is rEquired to justify the
imposirion of the plan area development impact
Most of the special assessment acts provide for the fees. ' I'he City can adopt the fees through approval issuance of bonds. These bonds generally are of an ordinance and/ or resolution. secured b the property in the district, and the
bonded indebtedness is repaid with the money
Tl irclParty. rsistance
generated through the assessments. Some of the
Some costs may be eligible for outside financing
most common types of special assessments are
assistance. For example, schools and libraries may
outlined in the Improvement Act of 1911, the
be partially financed by state contributions.

Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and the
Improvement Bond rlct of 1915. Private DeueloperF'i taraczytg Landscape andLighting Di.rtric ts In addition to the use of public financing mechanisms, private developers in the CLSP will
The most commonly known and widely used
be required to pap for a significant portion of the
special assessment is a Landscape and Lighring backbone infrastructure and public faciliues District, enabled by the Landscape and Lighting de elopment costs.

Act of 1972 ( Streets and Highways Code Section
22500 et ea•). A Landscape and Lighring District Financ7ng of Ongoing Operation andMaintenance may be formed to assist in funding of the ongoing

Page 9 ends

Lathrop City CouncilNovember 13, 2023

Lathrop City Council
November 13, 2023