Agenda packet — Lathrop City Council, February 10, 2025 (part 3 of 3)

Status: • Keep lI Modify • Remove
This program remains necessary, despite not being implemented during the 5" Cycle, and will be kept as Program X: Historic Lathrop Overlay District Re -Investment and Preservation.

Program 3c: Continue to employ a full time code
compliance officer who will vigorously enforce the building and zoning codes in locations where dilapidation, blight, and/ or health and safety violations may be occurring.

Coordinate code compliance efforts with the housing
rehabilitation program with code compliance efforts to
encourage property owners to maintain dwelling units in safe and habitable conditions. Regularly review housing conditions to determine if specific locations or
neighborhoods require targeted code enforcement and
work to provide, when funding is available, targeted
rehabilitation or replacement assistance.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing; biennial review of areas
appropriate for targeted assistance and/ or
enforcement
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City continues to employ code enforcement staff and actively enforces building and safety codes. The City' s
Code Compliance Division targets specific
areas based on complaints received and also strives to address city - wide code compliance. This program is effective.

Status: Keep 4 Modify • Remove
This program has been effective but will be modified to include additional objectives to ensure that code compliance and housing rehabilitation is appropriately addressed.

Program 3d:

Continue to participate in the San Joaquin Urban County consortium to provide funding and support for the
rehabilitation of mobile homes, when adequate funds are available.

In 2020/ 2021, conduct outreach to mobilehome park
residents and qualified non - profits to determine if there is interest in the State' s Mobilehome Park Rehabilitation and Resident Ownership Program and any of the City' s
mobilehome parks would be eligible for this type of
program.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing; Mobilehome outreach in
2020 and 2021
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City has
continued to participate in the San Joaquin Urban County and HOME Consortium. Throughout the 5'" Cycle, the City designated a portion of its available funds for housing rehabilitation. These funds are available to lower income homeowners, including owners of mobile homes, for housing rehabilitation. As of 2022, the City continues to coordinate with San Joaquin County to offer CDBG funding for the Rehabilitation Program. The City advertises the State' s Mobilehome Park Rehabilitation and Resident Ownership Program. The City is in the process of conducting outreach to mobilehome park residents.

Status: • Keep MI Modify • Remove
This program is partially effective. The housing rehabilitation program component will be continued. The mobilehome outreach effort will be moved to a separate program with additional steps to educate staff or coordinate with a mobilehome park conversion expert to ensure that the outreach to the mobilehome community is well- informed and accurate.

Program 3e: Regularly review the City' s eligibility for Federal and State home repair, renovation, and replacement programs annually and apply for programs, as appropriate.

If multifamily owners or other entities express interest in available funding 3rocrams for housinc rehabilitation or Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City has
participated in multiple clean energy financing programs, including California Municipal Finance Authority ( CMFA) Open Property Assessed Clean Energy ( PACE), California Statewide Communities Develoyment Authority ( CSCDA) Chen PACE, Fictree PACE, and City of Lathrop I HBR- 194
515
2023-031 Housing Element Background Report
repair, support the application for funding and, if
appropriate and feasible, provide technical assistance to the project applicant with the funding application.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing; annual outreach to
developers and property owners through the Annual
Action Plan process
Golden State Finance Authority to ensure that loans and financing are available for residential and commercial property owners to make clean - energy and energy -efficient improvements to their homes. The City did not identify any additional funding programs, apart from the previously mentioned financing programs and the City' s CDBG and
HOME funds, for housing repair, renovation, and replacement. The City is optimistic that the increased attention to affordable housing needs at the State level will result in an increase in State -funded programs to assist jurisdictions in addressing housing rehabilitation and other needs, so the City will continue to review available funding sources with the long- term goal of increasing funds for housing rehabilitation as well as emergency and minor repairs.

Status: Keep Q Modify • Remove
This program is effective and will be merged into a single program focused on housing rehabilitation in the Housing Plan.

GOAL 4: Provide Housing Free From Discrimination.

Program 4a: Continue to encourage the enforcement of
federal and state fair housing standards. The City will provide fair housing information to interested citizens and will make fair housing materials from the California
Department of Fair Housing and Employment and the
federal Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
available at City Hall, the Library, the Community Center, and on the City' s website in both English and Spanish. All requests for fair treatment on housing will be referred to the fair housing provider funded through the San Joaquin
Urban County consortium ( currently San Joaquin Fair
Housing, Inc.).

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City provides fair housing services for Lathrop residents and tenants through San Joaquin Fair Housing, funded through an annual allocation of its CDBG funds through the Urban County/ HOME Consortium. San Joaquin Fair Housing provides information regarding fair housing that addresses disability, familial status, and tenants rights in both English and Spanish. The City also provides Department of Fair Housing and Employment brochures which also address familial status and disability, among other fair housing topics, and provides a link to the San Joaquin Fair Housing website through the City' s Economic Development home page. The City ensures that fair housing brochures are available at City Hall as well as other community locations. Theh City did not receive any fair housing inquiries during the 5 Cycle.

Status: Keep Q Modify • Remove
This program has been effective but will be modified to include additional objectives to provide education and access to fair housing resources.

Program 4b: Require all recipients of locally administered housing funds to acknowledge their understanding of fair housing law, affirm their commitment to the law, and to provide fair housing opportunities for all persons.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing
Accomplishments: Partially implemented and ongoing. The City did not have any locally - administered housing funds during the reporting period that were granted to subrecipients by the City.

Status: • Keep tI Modify Remove
This program remains relevant and appropriate despite not being necessary during the 5th Cycle and will be consolidated into the City' s updated affirmatively furthering fair housing programs in the Housing Plan.

GOAL 5: Encourage and Enhance Housing Coordination.

Program 5a: Continue to participate in the San Joaquin
Housing Authority and encourage the Housing Authority to increase assistance to the City, through allocating more Housing Choice Vouchers and working with housing
developers to provide Project -Based Vouchers, as well as other assistance administered by the Housing Authority.

The City shall provide information on the availability of Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City continues to support use of Housing Choice Vouchers in the City. While there are a limited number of Housing Choice vouchers provided by the San Joaquin Housing Authority to City residents, voucher usage increased during the 5th Cycle from 18 in 2019 to 31 in 2023. This program continues to be an important source of assistance, City of Lathrop I HBR- 195
516
2023-031 Housing Element Background Report
Housing Authority programs to interested residents.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing; annual coordination and
outreach to Housing Authority to encourage increased
assistance
particularly to extremely low and very low income households.

Status: • Keep Q Modify • Remove
This program has been effective but will be modified to include additional outreach to further support use of Housing Choice Vouchers in Lathrop.

Program 5b: Provide housing information to all interested agencies, developers, residents, and non- profit groups. City staff will assist with Zoning and General Plan inquiries as well as provide contact information between the San
Joaquin Urban County Consortium, San Joaquin Housing
Authority, housing developers, and non- profit groups.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City provides housing information as requested to interested parties and addresses inquiries regarding the housing process.

Status: Keep D Modify • Remove
This program has been effective and overlaps with several other programs. This program will be merged into applicable programs in the Housing Plan addressing availability of information regarding housing resources, the City' s planning process, and outside agencies.

GOAL 6: Energy Conservation.

Program 6a: Promote energy efficient land use planning
by incorporating energy conservation as a major criterion for future decision making. This shall include innovative site designs and orientation techniques, which incorporate
passive and active solar designs and natural cooling
techniques.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City encourages energy -efficiency in all activities, including land use planning. The City requires projects to comply with CalGreen, the State' s Green Building Code with addresses both passive and active energy efficiency methods, and encourages projects to exceed CalGreen requirements.

In 2018, the City joined the California Municipal Finance Authority CMFA) joint powers authority to provide a streamlined approach through the Open Property Assessment Clean Energy ( PACE) program to funding clean -energy improvements to commercial and residential projects. The City also participates in multiple other clean energy financing programs, including CSCDA Open PACE, Figtree PACE, and Golden State Finance Authority. These programs ensure that property owners can apply for financing to make clean -energy and energy -efficient improvements, including renewable energy, water conservation, and electric vehicle charging.

Status: CZJ Keep • Modify • Remove
This program has been effective and will be continued in the Housing Plan.

Program 6b: Encourage pre -application meetings to
address site layout and design components that encourage energy conservation prior to any formal submittal that is to be considered by the Planning Commission and/ or City
Council. The City shall continue to rely on project input from all departments to assess design and layout for all residential projects.

Priority/ Timing: Ongoing
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City encourages pre -application meetings as discussed under Program 2a. All projects are required to comply with CalGreen, which includes mandatory standards for energy -efficiency and water conservation and the approach to compliance with these standards can be discussed at the pre -application meeting.

Status: • Keep Q Modify • Remove
This program has been effective, remains necessary, and will be merged into a single program addressing energy efficiency in planning projects.

Program 6c: Continue to support energy conservation in
existing and new housing, through participating in
programs such as the Open PACE clean energy program
and ensuring the community has access to current energy conservation methods and practices as well as information on ) roc rams available to fund enercy conservation
Accomplishments: Implemented and ongoing. The City provides information on methods to conserve energy, including CalGreen requirements and opportunities to retrofit existing properties through the Open PACE program, and other programs as they are available, at City Hall and via the City' s
website.

City of Lathrop I HBR- 196
517
2023-031 Housing Element Background Report
improvements. Ensure information is available at City Hall The City has actively worked to support energy conservation. In and on the City' swebsite. 2016, the City Council approved the City' s first clean energy Priority/ Timing: Ongoing financing program, the Home Energy Renovation Opportunity HERO) Financing Program through the PAC) Program. In 2017, the City Council approved similar clean energy financing programs with CSCDA Open Pace, Figtree Pace, and Golden State Financing Authority. In 2018, the City Council approved participation in the CMFA Open PACE Program. Information related to the energy conservation is available upon request.

Status: Keep Q Modify Remove
This program has been effective but will be modified to include additional objectives to ensure that energy efficiency is appropriately addressed in the Housing Plan.

Program 6d: Accomplishments: Partially implemented and ongoing. The City Encourage new residential development or significant provides information on methods to conserve energy, including rehabilitation projects to meet or exceed CalGreen Tier 1 CalGreen and LEED requirements and opportunities to retrofit and/ orto achieve LEED certification. existing properties through the Open PACE program at City Hall, and is developing additional information for the City' swebsite to Priority/ Timing: Ongoing encourage green and energy -efficient development. Subdivisions at River Islands have incorporated water -conservation measures, energy -efficient lighting and appliances, and solar and electric vehicle charging options. The City works with each developer to ensure that optional energy -saving measures are implemented to the extent appropriate and feasible, while recognizing that these initial costs are passed on to the homebuyer or renter and can result in an increase in monthly housing costs while also providing cost - savings in energy and water costs.

Status: Keep Q Modify • Remove
This program has been effective and will be merged with similar programs that promote sustainability, energy efficiency and conservation, and green building measures.

City of Lathrop I HBR- 197
518
2023-031 Housing Element Background Report

7. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN
Government Code Section 65300. 5states: "In construing the provisions of this article, the Legislature intends that the general plan and elements and parts thereof comprise an integrated, internally consistent and compatible statement of policies for the adopting agency." Additionally, Government Code Section 65583 ( c)( 7) requires the identification of " means by which consistency will be achieved with other general plan elements and community goals." The Housing Element of a general plan sets out a city' soverall long- range planning strategy for providing housing for all segments of the community. The California Government Code requires general plans to contain an integrated, consistent set of goals and policies. The Housing Element is, therefore, affected by policies contained in other elements of a general plan.

The housing element is most intricately related to the land use element. The Land Use Element establishes the framework for development of housing by laying out the land use designations for residential development and indicating the type and density permitted by a city.

Working within this framework, the City of Lathrop' sHousing Element identifies priority goals, objectives, and program actions for the 2023-031 planning period that directly address the housing needs of Lathrop' s existing and future residents. The policies contained in other elements of the City' s General Plan affect many aspects of life that residents enjoy such as the amount and variety of open space; the preservation of natural, historic and cultural resources; permitted noise levels in residential areas; and the safety of the residents in the event of a natural or man-ade disaster. The Housing Element has been reviewed for consistency with the City' s other General Plan Elements and the policies and programs in this Element do not conflict with the policy direction contained in other parts of the General Plan. As portions of the General Plan are amended in the future, the Housing Element will be reviewed to ensure that internal consistency is maintained.

RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CITY PLANS AND POLICIES
The Housing Element identifies priority goals, objectives, policies, and action programs during the planning period that directly address the housing needs of Lathrop. The City' s other plans and policies including its Municipal Code, Zoning Code, Master Plan, and Specific Plans must all remain consistent with the Housing Element. As revisions are considered to the City' s Code
and various plans, each revision will be reviewed to ensure that no conflicts with the Housing Element occur.

PRIORITY FOR WATER AND SEWER
Per Chapter 727, Statues of 2004 ( SB 1087), upon completion of an amended or adopted housing element, a local government is responsible for immediately distributing a copy of the Element to area water and sewer providers. Water and sewer providers must grant priority for service allocations to proposed developments that include housing units affordable to lower -income households. As the responsible agency, the City of Lathrop will supply a copy of the adopted housing element to the Lathrop Public Works Department ( LPWD), as well as to all other water and sewer providers serving the City. The City is also preparing policy language to ensure that all lower income housing projects receive priority for water and sewer service, consistent with State law.

ENERGY CONSERVATION
Energy efficiency has direct application to affordable housing because the more money spent on energy, the less available for rent or mortgage payments. High energy costs have particularly detrimental effects on low- income households that do not have enough income or cash reserves to absorb cost increases and many times must choose between basic needs such as shelter, food, and energy.

CITY STANDARDS
The City has adopted and enforces the 2022 California Energy Code and the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code City of Lathrop I HBR- 198
519
2023-031 Housing Element Background Report
CALGreen). CALGreen has streamlined energy efficiency and conservation measures for jurisdictions throughout California.

CALGreen addresses energy efficiency through requiring compliance with Title 24 energy efficiency standards which address energy efficiency through appliances, air conditioning/ heating units, water heating systems, windows/ doors, insulation, roofing, lighting, solar -readiness, as well as requiring additional mandatory measures that address site development stormwater management), construction ( construction waste reduction/ recycling, pollution control,) and long- term use of the residence ( indoor water use, outdoor water use, building maintenance and operation, fireplaces, indoor air quality and exhaust, and interior moisture control). Single family and duplex developments are required to be wired for electric vehicle charging and the multifamily projects with 17 or more units must provide electric vehicle charging spaces. The 2022 CALGreen Code includes several amendments to the 2019 CALGreen Code, including new voluntary prerequisites for builders to choose from, such as battery storage system controls and heat pump space, and water heating, to encourage building electrification. The 2022 CALGreen Code went into effect Statewide on January 1, 2023.

Chapter 13. 08 of the Municipal Code establishes water conservation and rationing standards, including measures for water conservation and water restrictions. Section 17. 92. 060 of the Zoning Code establishes water conservation requirements for landscaping in new development.

Households benefit from increased energy efficiency and water conservation requirements as demand for electric, natural gas, and water is reduced which can result in reduced electric, natural gas, and water bills. The Housing Plan includes policies and actions to encourage energy efficiency and conservation in residential development.

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Owners of existing housing can benefit from home improvements, such as window, door, and appliance replacement, increased insulation, and weatherization that reduce energy and water demand and thus reduce energy and water bills. Energy efficient programs include but are not limited to the following:

California Municipal Finance Authority Open PACE Program. The City participates in this program to ensure that loans and financing are available for residential and commercial property owners to make clean - energy and energy - efficient improvements to their homes. This program provides for deferred payments and can be used for extensive energy -efficiency and renewable energy improvements.

PG& E Energy Savings Assistance Program. This program provides qualified customers with energy -saving improvements at no charge. Energy -saving measures through the Energy Savings Assistance Program can include repairing or replacing appliances, including the refrigerator, furnace, or water heater, and installing insulation, weatherproofing, energy -efficient light bulbs, caulking, and low -flow showerheads. Participants must live in a home that is at least five years old and must meet household income requirements.

Rebate Programs. PG& E offers rebates for eligible appliances including clothes washers and gas, electric, or solar water heaters. Appliances eligible for rebates typically change annually.

Weatherization Program. San Joaquin County Weatherization Program administered through San Joaquin HSA provides home or duplex weatherization services such as: minor home repair, glass replacement, attic ventilation, low -flow showerheads, ceiling insulation, evaporative cooler vent cover, door weatherstripping, water heater blanket, duct wrap, switches & outlet gaskets, caulking, and other weatherstripping.

City of Lathrop I HBR- 199
520
City of Lathrop
6th Cycle Housing Element
Adoption Draft
Appendices
January 2025
521
Appendix A
Inventory of Residential Sites
522

APPENDIX
A -

INVENTORY

OFRESIDENTIAL
SITES

SITAPN/
E

ADDRESS
ACRES

GENERAL PLAN
ZONING

EXISTING
USE
EXISTING UNITS IW_ TYPE

PUBLIC OWNER
PRIOR

CYCLE USE

EXISTING DENSITY
RATIO
OF MAX. UNITS

TO EXISTING UNITS

IMPROVE MENTS VALUE
RATIO
LAND V
ALUE
OF

IMPROVE MENT/MAXI- LAND VALUE

MUM DENSITY

MINI- MUM DENSITY

MAXI- MUM UNITS

REALISTIC

VERY LOW
L
OW

CAPACITY
19119033
17774

SMANTHEY
RD

6. 79
HD
RH- MV

DRAINAGE
BASIN
0 UND
CITY
NA
0 0
0 40
15 271
190
114
19608026
14750

REVEREND

MAURICE
COTTON
DR

1.50 HD
RM- 2

MOBILEHOME
1 UND
5thno

0. 67
37 .
00 200
000
200
000

1. 00
25 16
37 25
15 19608044
421
W

LATHROP
RD

1. 00
RM .? HD
INGLE
FA
RESIDENTIALMILY 1
UND
no

1. 00

25. 00
21 963
10398

2. 15
25 16
25 17
19608066
587
W

LATHROP
RD 100
HD
RFA. 2

INGLE FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
no

1. 00
2400
13 527
9 970
Ineno en, , na
A
ll ..
0004407800642
28 24
CI

REVEREN
148W

DMAURICE
COTTON
DR
I
Ial
IMIZI
II:=
5 C00
60000
INEecg®
21:31M= 1!
14722

REVEREND

MAURICE
COTTON
DR
IInM

MEMIMIIIIIIII
M1111M
20=MIF1!'

IMEIIIIIIIMMI
INIIIME1521211011111ZIMIII

MMIIIIENIIIIIII
11111111111I
IZEIMI"!! MMINIIIIII©©
0 19648053 LA
1150
RUE
CT
R. 1. 6
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
NA
0 1&
62 NA
19624016
15527
FIFTH
ST
R. 1 6
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
0 19. 631
NA
19647021

CAMBRIDG
16200
E
DR
IlR- 1 6
HURCH,

SYNAGOGUE
TEMPLE. OR
ITE
IS VACANT.
60%
REAUSIIC 60%

CAPACITY
0 UND
no
n
NA79206
225
2 s
I
IIIIIIIIIIEIlI2!! lEMI=A
X1©
D
o
1961304
323
VILLA
REAL
a '•'
I1» 1I
111111
42 251
66 .
397
4 a
M®IIIIIIIIMIII7MM= 1:I
II
I
19613040
266 CAMISH
PL

0. 14
R- 1 6
VACANT
0 VAC
CITY
NA
NA
s
24102052
17991

SMANTHEY

7. RD
95 RL- MV

DRAINAGE
BASIN
0 ND
CITY
NA
NA
0 UIInILCO1RL. FAV CC

M OBILEHOM
E
0 70
242

46. 377
CC
41 222
407
III
1960800119607027
10SHILLING
AVE

DWELLING VACANT
001 19607028
16SHILLING
A
VE

TWO STRU CTU
RES,
LESS
THA
N .

NORESIDENCE.

NA
021. ill764®,
1121
LOE
UISE
AVE
NA
89 46]
53r
4 19608039
14737
AVON
AVE- M
MOBILE
HOM
E
19650008
1303
E
LOUISE AVE19608033
165J000
298 SHILLING
AVE

0. 25 RM -MD
3 DWELLING
UNIT
1 UND
no
NA

4. 04

3. 00

5. 170
1 15
8 3
1 0
19608053
14628
AVON
AVE

0. 48
MD
RM- 3
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA NA
0 15
8 7
4 0
19608038
14667
AVON

1. AVE
MD
00 RM- 3 MOBILEHOM
E
1 UND
no
NA

1. 00

15. 00
3'. .
0 15
a
15 8
0 19605020
14469

REVEREND

MAURICE
COTTON
DR MD1. 05
RM- 3
VACANT
0 VAC
CITY
NA
NA
0 0
NA
15 B
15 9
0 19605062
144W
AVON
AVE

0. 14
MD
RM- 3
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA NA
0 18. 757
0 15
8 2
1 0
19605023
2WWARREN
AVE

0. 27

MD RM -
3 VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
NA
0 60
492
0 15
B
3 2
0 19605018

REVEREN
14377

DMAURICE
COTTON
DR

1. W
MD
RM- 3

M OBILEH
OME
1 UND
noNA

1."
150
0 5. 791
579_29
0 15
8 15
8 0
19605017
14311

REVEREND

COTTOMAURICE
N

1. DR
0 MD
RM- 3
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA

1. 00

15. 0
5 113,
295
NA
15 8
15 9
0 A- 1
523

APPENDIX
A -

INVENTORY

OFRESIDENTIAL
SITES

APN/ SITE

ADDRESS
ACRES

GENERAL PUN
ZONING

EXISTIN
G
USE

EXISTING UNITS
ItN_ TYPE
PRIOR
PUBLIC

CYCLEOWNER USE

EXISTIN
G

DENSITY
RATIO
OF MAX.UNITS TO EXISTING UNITS
IMPR
OVEMENTS VALUE

LAND VALUE
RATIO
OF

IMPROVE MENT/ LAND
VAL UE

MAXI- MUM DENSITY

MINI- MUM

DENSITY

MAXI- MUM UNITS
REA
USTIC

VERY LOW
LOW

CAPACITY
18605032
14275
AVON
AVE

1. 00
MD
RM- 3
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
NA
0 36819
NA
15 8
15 9
0 19605033
14316

REVEREND
COTTO

MAURICE
N
DR

0. 99
RM-3MD
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
NA
0 50686NA
15 8
14 8
0 21374001- A
RIVER

ISLANDS

PARKWAY/ SOMERSTON

PARKWAY

7.68 MU -
RI
MU -
RI
VACANT
0 VACNo no NA
0 0
NA
40 6
307
154
77 19224016
15450
GOLDEN
VALLEY

PARKWAY

1.70 R/ MU- CL
CO -
CL
VACANT
0 VAC
no
No
NA
0 2
023 ,
545
NA
49 0
83 42
25 19224019- A
GOLDEN
VALLEY

PKWY/ MANTHEY
DR
LAND
PARK
DR

5.95 MU - R/
CL

CO - VACL
CANT
0 VACNo no
NA
0 79101NA
49 0
291
146
88 19224019- B
GOLDEN
VALLEY

PKWY/ MANTHEY
LANDR
D PARK
DR 5. 05 MU - R/
CL
CO -
CL
VACANT
0 VAC
no
No
NA
0 678229
NA
49 0
247
124
74 19202040- A
410
DOS
RD
REIS

5. 85 MU - R/
CL

R/ MU- CL
SINGLE
FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
no
No

0.17 234. 00
0 100250
0 40
10 234
116
70 19202040- 6
410
DOS
RD
REIS

5. 85 MU - R/
CL

R/ MU- CL
SINGLE
FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
no
No

0.17 234. 00
567367
100. 250
6 40
10 234
116
70 19202039- A
468
DOS
REIS
RD

5.88 R/ MU- CL

R/ MU- CL
VACANT
0 VAC
no
No
NA
0 94040
NA
40 10
235
118
71 19202039- 8
468
DOS
REIS
RD 5. 90 MU - R/
CL

R/ MU- CL
VACANT
0 VAC
no
No
NA
0 94040
NA
40 10
236
118
71 38203038- 4444306464,- N3
3433
RAML3GL
MLIG0/
A
3 CND
Ae
No

4. 83
34, 00
402, 670
33, 448
4 44
40 43
Q
0 304064
12o2T
4K46 -R133,02
RfMU- C4
A/W{ L
NLFk% A°° 6FAMI"- PET
L
U
ONO
Ao
No
0344
443, 00
402, 053
4-
4354
3 40
4, 0
433
0 0
19202059
tem
I
N
cnu 0uuAN VAor
LLEY SOPKwT,
UTH
OF
D
OS
REIS
RD 2. 81 MU -R/
CL

R/ MU- CL

DETENTION
BASIN
0 UND No no
NA
0 23 ,
225
Q.
40 10
112
56 34
19203045
AND

SPARTAN
WY

6. 17

R/ MU- CL

R/ MU- CL
VACANT
0 VACno
No
NA
0 765. 257
0 40
10 246
123
74 19202032
240
DOS
REIS
RD

11. 89

R/ MU- CL

AGNICUL
I
U
5IRULIU
RAL
00 %RE.
0 VACANT.
0 UNDno
No
NA
36, 204
363 .
711
0 40
10 475
238
143
21362002
RIVER

ISLANDS

PKWY/ ROLLTIDE
WY

18. 93
RI RHRH-I
VAtAN1.

MATERIALS —
STORED
ON
SITE,
NO
BUT
IMPROVEMENTS.
0 VA
C
no
No
NA
0 0
NA
40 15
757
606
333
333630390
WE
67 V
II -
LA SOUT1 —
H
0'
DEL
W6°°
B.

RN -
R1
AN -
R1
VACANT
0 VAC Ae
NA
40 46
0 0
0 21361046
CAMBAY

PKWY/ CALLERTON
AVE

8.24 RH-I
RH-I
VACANT
O
VA
C
ilsa
NA
0 JA
42 9
542
263
145
21361047
CAMBAY
PTON
AVE

8.9 RH-I
RH-I
VACANT
0 VAC
o
NA
0 VA
40 5
55 284
56 21347012
WOO8
DGREEN

CT/OWPER
CT

1.9 RM-I
RL-I
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
NA
0 JA
9 3
10 7
0 21347012- A

WOODGREEN
CT8.

CT/OWPER
32 RM-I
RM-I
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA
0 NA
20 6
166
116
70 19155071
TO395 CEN
WNE
TRE
DR

1.47 VC
CV -
MV
VACANT
0 VAC
no
5th
NA
0 405, 00
NA
25 16
36 25
15 19155073
345 TOWNE
CENTRE
DR
391.

VC
CV -
MV
VACANT
0 VAC
no
5th
NA
0 446. 20
NA
25 16
34 24
14 21362001

STEWART
RO

ROAD/ UNNAMED

19. AD
19 RM-I
RM-I

RESIDENCE,

AGRICULTURAL
USES.
0 UND
no
NA
NA
383. 00
Q
732. 400
Q
20 6
383
68 0
21' 620' 4
RRM4
AM -
A
4 I'N0'°''° '
4515
0 VA6
ea
NA
NA
36 6
0 4
e
21363016
RO

STEWART

ADUNNAMED
ROAD

25. 00
RM-I
RM-I
VACAN
T
0 VAC
no
NA
NA
Q
0 NA
20 6
SOD
350
0 4044
2-'
TOP
ART
AB
300. 84
300. 84
VACANT
6 444 NeNA
0 443, 27
NA
40 6
0 0
34, .-
2411( 411,
T
R" V"/
41- 6,
0 0- 8301
300- 84
VACAN
T
O V
A6
ee Ne
NA
0 16641346
NA
40 6
0 0
i. EVPKWV/ CAM
BAY
PKWY

8.0706/
RI

TOD- RI
VACANT
VAC
No
NA
0 NA
40 6
352

25. 6
140
30D -
R4
VACAN300. 84
T
O
VA6
re,
NeNA
0 4.10, 334
NA
40 6
0 0
300314
084 30.

VA
C
ANT
6 VA6
4,-
Ne
NA
0 433, 32
NA
40 6
0 0
0_. 3
CAM
BAY
PKWY
18_00
TO

TOD- RI
D- RI
VACANT
VAC
No
NA
0 NA
40 6
720
474
261

34.. ,
2100?
S .... ... .. _ ... . .. _.._,`.
300 -
134
04111- R4
04668/ 44
6 V
AG No
NA
0 86' 309
NA
40 6
0 0
I/ -
1: .
363020-
ISLA
RIVER
NDS
PKWY/ STC"'
2WAY
AVE

12. 70

MU - MU-RI
RI
VACANT
OVAC
No
NA
0 895007
NA
40 6
508
279
153
420-
F^"," °
0" T° 4W'-
0/
F
MU -
RI
A44 -
RI
VACANT
6 WL6
ea NeNA
0 ONA
40 6
0 0
IT
OARA015E
RD/ STORN^," _
15_90
MU -
RI
MU -
RI
VACAN"
VAC
n
No
NA
0 40
15 636
302
166
4C
MU -
RI
PAU-A
0V. AC
Ne
NA
A
ONA
40 6
0 0
WF
MA4 A-0MU -
RI
50-. OVA6 NoNA
0 6NA
40 6
0 9
RIVER
ISLANDS: •

TDRNOWAY
AVE
6214,
A4U- RI
MU -
RI.

VACAN
Y. A.c_
No
NA
0 N4
6Q
I6
1544
886
166/
0 -
FST1745 "• ,^ ° T
0,W.. -
5- 064
MU- R4 144V MU- N= 1448
ACA
6VA6
wa
Ne
NA
6 6
N
40 6
A
0 ML -
R4
M4 VAGAN
6 OVAL
A.,,
N0
NA
0 0N
40 6
A
0 19_20
MU -
RI
MU -
RI
VACANT
0 VAC

0. 2
No
NA
0 N4
40 19
768
403
222
4 ^
MO
MAFOE°'
V "
NET"
4449
as
8084{
0 4

0.0 18
8224
62625
45 8
0 0
0 19608040
10777
AVON
AV MD

1.00 RM- 3
SINGLE
FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1UND
no
NA

1. 00

15. 00
91, 561
10,98
9 15
8 15
8 0
VON
PV
M0
643
43 3VV4
S' OS
ON
6/
0615 0 10
00 444o. .
4040/
6 4
000
8449
2 36481
NA
48 g
0 0
A- 2
524

APPENDIX
A -

INVENTORY

OFRESIDENTIAL

SITES A

PN / SITE

ADDRESS

GENERAL
ACRES
PLAN
ZONING

EXISTING
USE
EXISTI
NG
UNITS
INV_ TYPE

PUBLIC OWNER
PRIOR
CYCLE

EXISTING USE DENSITY
RATIO
OF MAX. UNITS TO EXISTING UNITS
IMPR
OVE.

MENTS VALUE
L

AND VALUE
RATIO
OF

IMPRO VEMENT/ LAND VALUE

MAXI- MUM DENSITY

MINI- MUM DENSITY

MAXI- MUM UNITS

REALISTIC

VERY LOW
L
OW

CAPACITY
19608041
14835
AVON
AV

1. 00
MD
RM- 3

SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
no
NA

1.00 15. 00
99' ".
935 ,
15 1
IS
8 15
8 0
0 19605027
14156
MAU

REVEREND
COTTO
RICE
N
DR

0. 99
RM-3MD
SINGLE
FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
NAno

1. 01

14. 00
76 59177
1 15
8 14
7 0
0 19605053
14368
AVON
AV
031.

MD
RM- 3

SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
no
NA

0. 97

15. 00
pi.
47,39
1 15
8 15
8 0
0 19605034
14365
AVON
AV

1. 00
MD
RM- 3
SINGLE
FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
NAno
1 .
00 15. 00
230
5¢. 791
4 15
8 15
8 0
0 19605031
14268

REVEREND

MAURICE
COTTON
DR

0. 99

RM - MD
3 SINGLE

FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
o
NA

1. 01

14. 00

79. 5086
2 15
8 14
7 0
0 19605036
14407
AVON
AV

1. 01
MD
RM- 3
SINGLE
FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
o
NA
0 .
99 15. 00
327
S
498
3 15
8 15
8 0
0 19605035
14388
MAU

REVEREND
RICE
COTTON
DR MD0. 99
RM- 3
SINGLE

FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
1 UND
o
NA

1. 01

14. 00
393
2 15
8 14
7 0
0 19605029
14190

REVEREND

MAURICE
COTTON
DR

1. 00
MD MO
RM- 3
BILE
H
OME
1 UND
NA

1.00 14. 00
2 15
8 14
7 0
0 19605052
AVON
14324
AV

1. 04
MD
RM- 3
FAM
SINGLE

ILYRESIDENTIAL
1 UND
NA
0 .
96 15 .
00 1
15 8
I5
8 0
0 STEWA
21363013
RT
ROAD

PARADISE

7. AVE
71 RM -
RM-I
RI
T
O
VAC
noNA

0. 1297
7 20
6 154
77 0
0 21363011

STEWART
ROAD

PARADISE
AVE
RM -13. 2
RI
RM-I
VACANT
0 VAC
no
NA

0.755858
0 UNA
20 6
264
132
0 0
21363015- A

STEWART
ROAD

PARADISE
AVE
RM -7. 57

RI VACA
RM-I
NT
Q. VAC
NA
0 0
NA
20 6
151
76 0
0 21363019- A

STEWART
ROAD /

PARADISE
AVE
36_2
L -

RI VACARL-I
NT
VAC
NA
4 USA
371
0 213630xx- A
ROA

STEWART

AVD/ PARADISE
E
58_ 08RL=RI
RL-I
VACANT
QVAC QVAC 0
VAC
NA NA
0 0

NA USA NA
9 20 20
3 6 6
522 1932 229
313 1159 115
0 0 0
0 0 0
213630xx- B
ROA

STEWART
D AV

PARADISE
E

96. 61
RL_RI
RLRL=RI
VACANT
21361004
STEW
ART
PA
ROAD /
RADISE
AVE

11. 47 RM -
RM-I
RI
VACANT
A- 3
525
Appendix B
Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
526
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q1 Do you live in Lathrop?
Answered: 17 Skipped: 0

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 58. 82%
No 41. 18%
TOTAL
Persons who responded " No" were forwarded to Question 9, skipping Questions 2 through 8. 10 7
17 1/ 31
527
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q2 How long have you lived in the City?
Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
0- 2 years
2-5 years
5- 10 years
10+ years
Other ( please specify)
TOTAL

RESPONSES

30. 00%

10. 00%

30. 00%

0.0%

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
There are no responses.
3 3
1 3
0 10
2/ 31
528
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q3 What made you decide to live here? (Select all that apply) Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
Affordability
Safety of neighborhood
Quality of housing stock
Quality of local school system
Proximity to job/ work
Proximity to family and/ orfriends
City services and programs
Proximity to shopping and services
Other ( please specify)
Total Respondents: 10

RESPONSES

80. 00%

60. 00%

30. 00%

20. 00%

0.0%

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
There are no responses.
8 6
3 3
2 2
2 0
0 3/1
529
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q4 Do you currently own or rent your home?
Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
I own my home
I rent my home
I live with extended family or with another household
I rent a room in a home
I am currently without permanent shelter
TOTAL

RESPONSES
100. 00%

0.0%

0.0%
10 0
0 0
0 10
4/ 31
530
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q5 Select the type of housing that best describes your current home.

Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
Single- family home ( detached)
Duplex/ attached home
Multi -family home ( apartment/ condominium)
Accessory Dwelling Unit, granny flat, guest house
Mobile home
Currently without permanent shelter
Other (please specify)
TOTAL

RESPONSES
100. 00%

0.0%

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
There are no responses.
10 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
5/ 31
531
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q6 How would you rate the physical condition of the residence you live in? Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
Sound: Very good to excellent condition and needs minimal repairs Minor : Shows signs of minor deferred maintenance ( e.g., peeling paint, chipped stucco, missing shingles, etc.) Moderate: Needs one modest rehabilitation improvements ( e.g., new roof, new wood siding, replacement of stucco, etc.)
Substantial: Needs two or more major upgrades ( e.g., new foundation, roof replacement, new plumbing, new electrical, etc.)
Dilapidated: Building appears structurally unsound, unfit for human habitation in its current condition, and demolition or major rehabilitation is required

RESPONSES

60. 00% 6

20. 00% 2

10. 00% 1

0.0% 0
TOTAL 10
6/ 31
532
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q7 How satisfied are you with your current housing situation? Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
I am very satisfied
I am somewhat satisfied
I am somewhat dissatisfied
I am dissatisfied
If you answered dissatisfied or somewhat dissatisfied please provide a reason below.

TOTAL

RESPONSES

20. 00% 2

70. 00% 7

10. 00% 1

0.0% 0

0.0% 0
10 IF YOU ANSWERED DISSATISFIED OR SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED PLEASE PROVIDE A DATE

REASON BELOW
There are no responses.
7/ 31
533
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q8 Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making on your home?
Answered: 10 Skipped: 7

ANSWER CHOICES
HVAC, solar, and electrical
Room addition
Landscaping
Roofing, painting, and general home repairs
Accessory dwelling unit
Does not apply
Other ( please specify)
Total Respondents: 10

RESPONSES

60. 00%

50. 00%

40. 00%

20. 00%

10. 00%

0.0%

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
There are no responses.
6 5
4 2
1 1
0 8/ 31
534
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q9 Which of the following best describes your household type? Answered: 11 Skipped: 6

ANSWER CHOICES
Couple with children under 18
Multi -generational or extended family household ( parents, grandparents, aunts/ uncles, children, grandchildren, etc. all under the same roof)
Single person living with roomates
Couple
Single person household
Single parent with children under 18
Single person living with family
Couple living with roommates
Adult head of household ( non - parent) with children under 18 Other ( please specify)
TOTAL

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
There are no responses.

RESPONSES

54.5% 6

27.7% 3

9. 09% 1

0.0% 0

0.0% 0
11 9/ 31
535
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q10 If you wish to own a home in Lathrop but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time? (Select all that apply)
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
I already own a home in Lathrop
I do not currently wish to own a home in Lathrop
I cannot find a home within my target price range
I do not currently have the financial resources for an appropriate down payment I do not currently have the financial resources for an adequate monthly mortgage payment I cannot find a home that suits my living needs ( housing size, disability accommodations) I cannot currently find a home that suits my quality standards Total Respondents: 7

RESPONSES

71. 43% 5

28. 57% 2

14. 29% 1

0.0% 0

0.0% 0
10/ 31
536
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q11 If you wish to rent a home in Lathrop but do not currently rent one, what issues are preventing you from renting a home at this time? (Select all that apply)
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
I do not currently wish to rent a home in Lathrop
I cannot find a home within my target rental cost
I already rent a home in Lathrop
I cannot find a home that suits my living needs ( housing size, disability accommodations) I cannot currently find a home that suits my quality standards Total Respondents: 7

RESPONSES

71. 43% 5

14. 29% 1

0.0% 0

0.0% 0
11 / 31
537
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q12 Do you think that the range of housing options currently available in the City of Lathrop meets your needs?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
Yes
No
TOTAL

RESPONSES

85. 71% 6

14. 29% 1
7 12 / 31
538
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q13 Do you think that the range of housing options currently available in the City meet the needs of the community?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
Yes
No
TOTAL

RESPONSES

57. 14%

42. 86%
13 / 31
539
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q14 What types of housing are most needed in the City of Lathrop? Select all that apply)
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
Single family, small ( less than 1, 600 square foot home) Single family, medium to large ( 1, 600 square foot home or larger) Duplex, Triplex, and Fourplex
Townhomes or Condominiums ( multi -family ownership homes) Apartments ( multi -family rental homes)
Co -housing ( individual homes that are part of larger development with shared common space, such as kitchen, living, recreation, and garden areas)
Accessory Dwelling Unit
Other ( please specify)
Total Respondents: 7

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
There are no responses.

RESPONSES

57. 14% 4

71. 43% 5

42. 86% 3

57. 14% 4

28. 57% 2

14. 29% 1

0.0% 0
14/ 31
540
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q15 How important are the following housing priorities to you and your family?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

VERY SOMEWHAT NOT DON' T TOTAL

IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT KNOW
Housing affordable to working families
Promote sustainable, efficient, and fire -safe housing to address safety, energy, and climate change impacts
Ensure that children who grow up in Lathrop can afford to live here
Create more mixed - use (commercial/ office and residential) projects to bring different land uses closer together
Ensure all persons and households have fair and equitable access to housing and housing opportunities
Sustainable, walkable development ( housing within walking distance to services, schools, and/ or the downtown)
Provide housing to meet Lathrop' ssocial and economic needs, including both existing and future residents, as well as employers
Provide ADA- accessible housing
Rehabilitate existing housing
Support fair/ equitable housing opportunities and programs to help maintain and secure neighborhoods that have suffered
foreclosures
Establish programs to help at -risk homeowners keep their homes, including mortgage loan programs
Lease -to -own housing ( condominiums, apartments)
Integrate affordable housing throughout the community to create mixed -income neighborhoods

85. 71% 14. 29% 0.0% 0.0%
6 1 0 0 7

71. 43% 28. 57% 0.0% 0.0%
5 2 0 0 7

57. 14% 28. 57% 14. 29% 0.0%
4 2 1 0 7

42. 86% 57. 14% 0.0% 0.0%
3 4 0 0 7

42. 86% 42. 86% 14. 29% 0.0%
3 3 1 0 7

28. 57% 71. 43% 0.0% 0.0%
2 5 0 0 7

28. 57% 14. 29% 42. 86% 14. 29%
2 1 3 1 7

0.0% 57. 14% 42. 86% 0.0%
0 4 3 0 7
15/ 31
541
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q16 Are there any populations or persons that need additional housing types or dedicated policies and programs to ensure they can access housing in Lathrop?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

VERY SOMEWHAT NOT DONT TOTAL WEIGHTED

IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT KNOW AVERAGE
Homeless persons or at risk of
homelessness
Seniors
Persons with a disability, including
developmental
Large families ( 5 or more persons)
Single Parent Head of Households
Farmworkers

57. 14% 0.0% 14. 29% 28. 57%
4 0 1 2 7 2. 14

42. 86% 42. 86% 0.0% 14. 29%
3 3 0 1 7 1. 86

42. 86% 28. 57% 0.0% 28. 57%
3 2 0 2 7 2. 14

42. 86% 28. 57% 14. 29% 14. 29%
3 2 1 1 7 2. 00
16 / 31
542
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q17 What is your race/ ethnicity?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
African American
Hispanic
Other ( please specify)
Asian
Native American
White/ Non- Hispanic
TOTAL
1 2

OTHER ( PLEASE SPECIFY)
multi
secret

RESPONSES

28. 57%

14. 29%

0.0%

0.0%
DATE
2/9/024 11: 23 AM
8/ 25/023 9: 12 PM
2 2
2 1
0 0
7 17 / 31
543
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q18 Do any of the following apply to you or someone in your household check all that apply):

Answered: 5 Skipped: 12

ANSWER CHOICES
Children under 18
Ages 65 or over
Ages 55 to 64
Large family ( 5 or more people)
Farmworker
A single female head of household with children
A single male head of household with children
Have a developmental disability
Have a disability ( non -developmental)
Total Respondents: 5

RESPONSES

80. 00%

60. 00%

40. 00%

0.0%

0.0%
4 3
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 18/ 31
544
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q19 What housing challenges have you experienced?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 10
My home is not big enough for my family or household.

I am concerned about my rent going up to an amount I can' tafford.

I struggle to pay my rent or mortgage payment.

There is a lot of crime in my neighborhood.

I have been discriminated against when trying to rent housing.

I cannot find a place to rent due to bad credit, previous evictions, or foreclosure.

YES NO TOTAL

28. 57% 71. 43%
2 5 7

14. 29% 85. 71%
1 6 7

14. 29%85. 71%
1 6 7

14. 29% 85. 71%
1 6 7

0.0% 100. 00%
0 7 7
I am concerned that if I ask my property manager or landlord to repair my home that my rent will go up 0.0% 100. 00% or I will be evicted. 0 7 7
I am concerned that I may be evicted.

I need assistance finding rental housing.

My home is in poor condition and needs repair.

I have been discriminated against when trying to purchase housing.

I need assistance with understanding my rights related to fair housing.

0.0% 100. 00%
0 7 7

0.0% 100. 00%
0 7 7
19/ 31
545
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q20 Do you or someone in your family have any of the following specific housing needs? Please check all that apply.

Answered: 2 Skipped: 15

ANSWER CHOICES
Senior independent living ( senior single family community or senior apartments) Assisted living for senior (55 and over) that provides assistance with daily tasks and has increasing levels of care ( from assisted living to skilled nursing)
Assisted living for disabled persons that provides assistance with daily tasks and has increasing levels of care ( from assisted living to skilled nursing)
Independent living for someone with a disability
Emergency shelter
Supportive or transitional housing that provides services and support to avoid homelessness Supportive services to find and obtain housing.

Daily living assistance and services to be able to live independently.

Total Respondents: 2

RESPONSES
100. 00% 2

50. 00% 1

0.0% 0

0.0% 0
20/ 31
546
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q21 Have encountered discrimination or other issues that have affected your ability to live in safe, decent housing of your choice? If so, please explain any discrimination or fair housing issues you have encountered.

Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

ANSWER CHOICES
No
Yes ( please specify)
TOTAL
1 YES ( PLEASE SPECIFY)
Owner did not want to rent to a
person of color

RESPONSES

85. 71%

14. 29%
DATE
8/ 24/023 5:9 PM
21/ 31
547
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q22 Multifamily. Looking at the map above, please identify your preference for new multifamily housing development in each area.

Answered: 7 Skipped: 10

STRONGLY PREFER NEUTRAL DO NOT STRONGLY DO TOTAL WEIGHTED

PREFER PREFER NOT PREFER AVERAGE
1 42. 86% 14. 29% 28. 57% 14. 29% 0.0%
3 1 2 1 0 7 1. 71
14 42. 86% 28. 57% 14. 29% 0.0% 14. 29%
3 2 1 0 1 7 1. 71
15 42. 86% 28. 57% 14. 29% 14. 29% 0.0%
3 2 1 1 0 7 2. 00
2 28. 57% 14. 29% 28. 57% 14. 29% 14. 29%
2 1 2 1 1 7 0. 57
11 28. 57% 28. 57% 28. 57% 0.0% 14. 29%
2 2 2 0 1 7 1.4
3 14. 29% 42. 86% 14. 29% 28. 57% 0.0%
1 3 1 2 0 7 0. 86
4 14. 29% 42. 86% 42. 86% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 3 0 0 7 1. 43
5 14. 29% 42. 86% 42. 86% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 3 0 0 7 1. 43
6 14. 29% 28. 57% 57. 14% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 4 0 0 7 1.4
7 14. 29% 28. 57% 57. 14% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 4 0 0 7 1.4
8 14. 29% 42. 86% 42. 86% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 3 0 0 7 1. 43
9 14. 29% 28. 57% 57. 14% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 4 0 0 7 1.4
10 14. 29% 28. 57% 42. 86% 14. 29% 0.0%
1 2 3 1 0 7 0. 86
12 14. 29% 42. 86% 28. 57% 0.0% 14. 29%
1 3 2 0 1 7 0. 86
13 14. 29% 42. 86% 14. 29% 14. 29% 14. 29%
1 3 1 1 1 7 0. 57
22/ 31
548
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q23 Mixed Use. Looking at the map above, please identify your preference for new mixed use development in each area.

Answered: 6 Skipped: 11
14 1
2 3
11 12
13 15
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 STRONGLY PREFER NEUTRAL DO NOT STRONGLY DO TOTAL WEIGHTED

PREFER PREFER NOT PREFER AVERAGE

50. 00% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 16. 67%
3 2 0 0 1 6 2. 00

33.3% 16. 67% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
2 1 3 0 0 6 1. 67

33.3% 16. 67% 33.3% 16. 67% 0.0%
2 1 2 1 0 6 1. 33

33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2 4 0 0 0 6 2. 67

33.3% 33.3% 16. 67% 0.0% 16. 67%
2 2 1 0 1 6 1. 33

33.3% 33.3% 16. 67% 16. 67% 0.0%
2 2 1 1 0 6 1. 67

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
2 2 2 0 0 6 2. 00

16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33

16. 67% 50. 00% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 2 0 0 6 1. 67

16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33

16. 67% 50. 00% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 2 0 0 6 1. 67

16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33

16. 67% 50. 00% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 2 0 0 6 1. 67
23/ 31
549
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q24 Single Family. Looking at the map above, please identify your preference for new single family housing in each area.

Answered: 6 Skipped: 11

STRONGLY PREFER NEUTRAL DO NOT STRONGLY DO TOTAL WEIGHTED

PREFER PREFER NOT PREFER AVERAGE
2 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
2 2 2 0 0 6 2. 00
1 16. 67% 16. 67% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0%
1 1 4 0 0 6 1. 00
3 16. 67% 16. 67% 33.3% 16. 67% 16. 67%
1 1 2 1 1 6 0.0
4 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
5 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
6 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
7 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
8 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
9 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
10 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
11 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
12 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
13 16. 67% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 16. 67%
1 2 2 0 1 6 0. 67
14 16. 67% 50. 00% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
1 3 2 0 0 6 1. 67
15 16. 67% 33.3% 50. 00% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2 3 0 0 6 1. 33
24/ 31
550
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q25 Are there other housing types needed in specific areas of the City? Please describe.

Answered: 2 Skipped: 15

RESPONSES DATE
1 We need more schools inside of Lathrop to support all the housing 2/ 12/024 2: 30 PM 2 No more housing in Lathrop. We lack basically and mainly SCHOOLS. no nice trees or shades 8/ 25/023 9: 17 PM just parks. Schools in River Island don' tallow Lathrop Kids. more homes, more traffic without basic facilities. less water and all trees are taken down and have fake grass, now more homes....
25/ 31
551
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q26 Housing Rehabilitation. Looking at the map above, please identify areas in need of housing rehabilitation.

Answered: 5 Skipped: 12

SIGNIFICANT
REHABILITATION:

SOME OR ALL

HOUSING IN THIS

AREA IS IN

DISREPAIR OR
UNSAFE.

MODERATE
REHABILITATION:

SOME HOUSING

IN THIS AREA IS
IN DISREPAIR.

MINOR
REHABILITATION:

MINOR REPAIRS,

BUT HOUSING IS

GENERALLY IN
GOOD CONDITION.

NO
REHABILITATION:

HOUSING IS IN
GOOD
CONDITION.

NO
LABEL)

TOTAL WEIGHTED

AVERAGE
4 20. 00% 20. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
1 1 1 0 2 5 1. 40
1 0.0% 20. 00% 40. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 1 2 0 2 5 0. 80
2 0.0% 0.0% 60. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 0 3 0 2 5 0. 60
3 0.0% 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 40. 00%
0 0 2 1 2 5 0. 40
5 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 2 1 0 2 5 1. 00
6 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 2 1 0 2 5 1. 00
7 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 2 1 0 2 5 1. 00
8 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 2 1 0 2 5 1. 00
9 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 2 1 0 2 5 1. 00
10 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 0.0% 40. 00%
0 2 1 0 2 5 1. 00
11 0.0% 0.0% 20. 00% 40. 00% 40. 00%
0 0 1 2 2 5 0. 20
12 0.0% 0.0% 20. 00% 40. 00% 40. 00%
0 0 1 2 2 5 0. 20
13 0.0% 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 40. 00%
0 0 2 1 2 5 0. 40
14 0.0% 0.0% 20. 00% 40. 00% 40. 00%
0 0 1 2 2 5 0. 20
15 0.0% 0.0% 40. 00% 20. 00% 40. 00%
0 0 2 1 2 5 0. 40
26/ 31
552
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q27 Community Investment. Looking at the map above, please identify areas in need of improved access to jobs, services, education, or recreation.

Answered: 5 Skipped: 12
JOBS:

IMPROVE

TRANSIT
1 60. 00%
3 2 60. 00%
3 3 60. 00%
3 4 20. 00%
1 5 20. 00%
1 6 20. 00%
1 7 20. 00%
1 8 20. 00%
1 9 20. 00%
1 10 20. 00%
1 11 20. 00%
1 12 20. 00%
1 13 40. 00%
2 14 20. 00%
1 15 40. 00%
2 JOBS: ADDITIONAL

EMPLOYEE - GENERATING

DEVELOPMENT

COMMERCIAL, OFFICES,

RESEARCHITECHNOLOGY,
ETC.)
SERVICES:

INCREASE

ACCESS TO

HEALTHCARE

20. 00% 0.0%
1 0

0.0% 0.0%
O 0

0.0% 0.0%
0 0

0.0% 0.0%
O 0

0.0% 0.0%
0 0

0.0% 0.0%
O 0

0.0% 20. 00%
0 1

0.0% 40. 00%
0 2

0.0% 0.0%
O 0

20. 00% 0.0%
1 0

40. 00% 0.0%
2 0
SERVICES:

INCREASE

ACCESS TO

DAILY LIVING

SERVICES

GROCERY,

BANKING,
ETC.)

0.0%
0 20. 00%
1 0.0%
0 20. 00%
1 40. 00%
2 20. 00%
1 40. 00%
2 40. 00%
2 20. 00%
1 40. 00%
2 60. 00%
3 20. 00%
1 0.0%
0 60. 00%
3 0.0%
0 EDUCATION:

INCREASE

ACCESS TO

SCHOOLS

20. 00%
1 20. 00%
1 20. 00%
1 40. 00%
2 20. 00%
1 40. 00%
2 20. 00%
1 40. 00%
2 40. 00%
2 40. 00%
2 0.0%
0 20. 00%
1 20. 00%
1 0.0%
0 20. 00%
1 0.0%
RECREATION: TOTAL

INCREASE

ACCESS TO
PARKS,

RECREATION

FACILITIES,

AND OPEN
SPACE

0.0%
0 5
0 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
0 5
1 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
2 5
0 5
0 5

20. 00%

0.0%

20. 00%

0.0%

40. 00%

0.0%

0.0%
27/ 31
553
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q28 What age range most accurately describes you?
Answered: 6 Skipped: 11

ANSWER CHOICES
0- 17 years old
18- 23 years old
24- 39 years old
40- 55 years old
56- 74 years old
75+ years old
TOTAL

RESPONSES

0.0%

33.3%

66.7%

0.0%

0.0%
0 0
2 4
0 0
6 28/ 31
554
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q29 Please describe any additional housing comments or concerns you would like to share with the City.

Answered: 2 Skipped: 15

RESPONSES
We need to break ground on the proposed k-8 school to support all of the new housing family needs
Enough Housing. No basic development. Crime rate increeased. No enough schools for kids.

Lack of water, even city center has fake grass... why and how can Lathrop accommodate new homes?
DATE
2/ 12/024 2: 32 PM
8/ 25/023 9: 19 PM
29/ 31
555
Lathrop Housing Needs and Priorities Survey
Q30 If you would like to be added to the City' scontact list for the Housing Element Update, please enter your contact information below. Note:

This information will be kept separate from the remainder of the survey responses in order to ensure responses are published anonymously Responses to Question 30 on pages 30 and 31 are deleted from the survey to maintain the privacy of respondents.
30/1
556
ATMCH!'. ENT fr s, z

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
651 Bannon St, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95811
916) 263-911 / FAX ( 916) 263- 7453
www. hcd. ca. gov
July 3, 2024
Rick Caguiat, Director
Community Development Department
City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Dear Rick Caguiat:

RE: City of Lathrop' s6th Cycle ( 2023- 2031) Draft Housing Element GAVIN NEWSOM, Govemor
Thank you for submitting the City of Lathrop' s (City) draft housing element received for review on April 5, 2024. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, the California Department of Housing and Community Development ( HCD) is reporting the results of its review. In addition, HCD considered comments from David Kellogg pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision ( c).

The draft element addresses many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to substantially comply with State Housing Element Law ( Gov. Code, 65580 et seq). The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law.

As a reminder, the City' s 6th cycle housing element was due December 31, 2023. As of today, the City has not completed the housing element process for the 6th cycle. The City' s 5th cycle housing element no longer satisfies statutory requirements. HCD encourages the City to revise the element as described, adopt, and submit to HCD to regain housing element compliance.

For your information, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 ( Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), as the City did not adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of the statutory deadline ( December 31, 2023), the City must complete rezones to make prior identified sites available or accommodate a shortfall of the regional housing need allocation RHNA) no later than one year from the statutory deadline. Otherwise, the local government' s housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law, and HCD may revoke its finding of substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision ( i). Please be aware, if the City does not adopt a compliant housing element within one year from the statutory deadline, the element cannot be found in substantial compliance until all necessary rezones are completed pursuant to Government Code sections 65583, (c)( 1)( A) and 65583. 2, subdivision ( c). 557
Rick Caguiat, Director

Page 2 ends

Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower -income and special needs households, by making information regularly available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate. Please be aware, any revisions to the element must be posted on the local government' s website
and to email a link to all individuals and organizations that have previously requested notices relating to the local government' shousing element at least seven days before submitting to HCD.

Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant, the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program, and HCD' s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/ or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.

For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the City to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor' sOffice of Planning and Research at:
https:// www. opr. ca. gov/ planninq/ general- plan/ guidelines. html.

We are committed to assisting the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Joanna Chang, of our staff, at Joanna. Chang@hcd. ca. gov.

Sincerely,
Paul McDougall
Senior Program Manager
Enclosure
558

APPENDIX

CITY OF LATHROP
The following changes are necessary to bring the City' s housing element into compliance with Article 10. 6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change, we cite the supporting section of the Government Code.

Housing element technical assistance information is available on HCD' s website at https:// www. hcd. ca. gov/ planning- and- community- development/ hcd- memos. Among other resources, the housing element section contains HCD' slatest technical assistance tool, Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements (Building Blocks), available at blocks
https:// www. hcd. ca. gov/ planning- and- communitv- development/ housinq- elements/ buildingand includes the Government Code addressing State Housing Element Law and other resources.

A. Housing Needs, Resources, and Constraints

1. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality' shousing need for a designated income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites.

Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)( 3).)
Progress in Meeting the Regional Housing Needs AllocationRegional Housing Needs Allocation ( RHNA): The element notes that the City has 43 moderate income units and 2, 795 above moderate income units in the pipeline which equates to 2, 838 units.

However, Table 4- 1 (p. 91) reflects a pipeline of 2, 009 units. The element must reconcile this information and accurately report the number of units by income category as progress towards the RHNA.

Additionally, the element is crediting several pipeline projects towards the moderate and above -moderate RHNA. The element includes a listing of the project, number of units, status, and remaining steps. However, the element should analyze this information to demonstrate the likelihood that these units will be available during the planning period.

To demonstrate the availability of units within the planning period, the element could analyze infrastructure schedules, the City' s past completion rates on pipeline projects, outreach with developers, and should describe any expiration dates on entitlements, anticipated timelines for final approvals, and any remaining steps for projects to receive final entitlements.

Lastly, the City' s
RHNA may be reduced by the number of new units built since June 30, 2023; however, the element must describe the City' s methodology for assigning these units to the various income groups based on actual or anticipated sales price or rent level or other mechanisms ensuring affordability ( e.g., deed -restrictions).

City of Lathrop' s6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 1 July 3, 2024
559
Realistic Capacity: The element notes that the City is assuming 80 percent of the maximum allowable density in multifamily zoning districts. However, this assumption does not appear to be supported by past multifamily trends as listed in Table 3- 19. For example, some recent multifamily developments appear to be 40- 60 percent of maximum allowable densities. Further, this analysis should incorporate the affordability of recent development. The element should either supplement the analysis with additional information related to multifamily and higher density projects or rescale assumptions based on recent multifamily trends.

Additionally, the element is assuming 50 percent of maximum densities on sites that allow 100 percent nonresidential uses ( p. 95). While the element indicates the City has made conservative assumptions, the element still should analyze the likelihood of residential development in zoning where 100 percent nonresidential uses are allowed.

The analysis should be based on factors such as development trends including nonresidential, performance standards requiring residential uses or other relevant factors such as enhanced policies and programs.

Suitability of Nonvacant Sites: The element is relying on nonvacant sites to accommodate a portion of the RHNA. The element notes that nonvacant sites include city -owned properties with temporary uses that will be redeveloped and sites with 1-2 residential units including mobilehomes that are 50 percent underutilized ( p. 96). The element includes a high- level statement that the City has seen redevelopment trends with these types of sites and existing uses. First, the element must clearly list any objective criteria used to identify sites including the actual values of the criteria in the inventory to relate it to the analysis and discuss how these factors are indicative of redevelopment potential. For example, while the element lists the existing uses in the sites inventory ( Appendix A), it did not quantify the degree of underutilization.

To facilitate an analysis demonstrating potential for additional development, the element should summarize past experiences converting existing uses to higher density residential development, include current market demand for the existing use, provide analysis of existing leases or contracts that would perpetuate the existing use or prevent additional residential development, include current information on development trends and market conditions in the City and relate those trends to the sites identified. For example, while the element provided few project examples, it provided no analysis demonstrating the applicability to existing uses in the sites inventory. The element should discuss the characteristics of those project examples (e.g., existing uses, zoning, affordability level, market area) and consider its applicability to the identified sites.

Additionally, if the element identifies sites with existing residential uses. Absent a replacement housing policy, these sites are not adequate sites to accommodate lower - income households. The replacement housing policy has the same requirements as set forth in Government Code section 65915, subdivision ( c), paragraph (3).

Lastly, while the element currently utilizes mostly vacant sites toward the lower -income RHNA, for future housing element submittals, if the housing element relies upon nonvacant sites to accommodate more than 50 percent of the RHNA for lower -income City of Lathrop' s6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 2 July 3, 2024
560
households, the housing element must demonstrate that the existing use is not an impediment to additional residential development in the planning period ( Gov. Code, 65583. 2, subd. (g)( 2).). This can be demonstrated by providing substantial evidence that the existing use is likely to be discontinued during the planning period ( Gov. Code, 65583. 2, subd. (g)( 2).).

Sites Identified from Prior Planning Periods: Sites identified in prior planning periods shall not be deemed adequate to accommodate the housing needs for lower -income households unless a program, meeting statutory requirements, requires rezoning within the timeframe specified in Government Code section 65583. 2(c). The element should clarify if sites were identified in prior planning periods and if so, which sites and add or modify a program pursuant to Government Code section 65583. 2(c). For more information on program requirements, please see HCD' s Housing Element Sites Inventory Guidebook at https:// www. hcd. ca. gov/ community- development/ housingelement/ housinq- element- memos/ doc/ sites inventory memo fina106102020. pdf.

Environmental Constraints: While the element included a broad discussion of general environmental constraints, it should discuss environmental constraints relative to identified sites and describe any other known environmental or other constraints ( e.g., shape, access, easements, conservation easements, Williamson Act contracts, military, airport and other compatibility, contamination) that could impact housing development on identified sites in the planning period.

Electronic Sites Inventory: Pursuant to Government Code section 65583. 3, subdivision b), the City must utilize standards, forms, and definitions adopted by HCD when preparing the sites inventory. Please see HCD' s housing element webpage at https:// www. hcd. ca. gov/ planning- and- community- development/ housinq- elements for a copy of the form and instructions. The City can reach out to HCD at sitesinventory hcd. ca. gov for technical assistance. Please note, upon adoption of the housing element, the City must submit an electronic version of the sites inventory with its adopted housing element to sitesinventorv( ahcd. ca. gov.

2. An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the types of housing identified in paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( c), and for persons with disabilities as identified in the analysis pursuant to paragraph ( 7), including land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures... (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. a)( 5)-)
Land Use Controls: While the element includes a listing of all land use controls for most zones, it must include and analyze all development standards for the MU -RI zone including setback requirements. Lastly, the element should evaluate the City' sparking requirements as potential constraints to multifamily development. For example, the City appears to require greater than two spaces per unit for multifamily uses which impacts housing costs for smaller bedroom types ( e.g., studio and one bedroom). The analysis City of Lathrop' s6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 3 July 3, 2024
561
should address any impacts on cost, supply, housing cost and ability to achieve maximum densities and include programs to address identified constraints.

Local Processing and Permit Procedures: The element should address public comments on this revised draft submittal and discuss compliance with the Permit Streamlining Act and intersections with CEQA and timing requirements, including streamlining determinations and add or modify programs as appropriate.

Design Review: The element includes some general information regarding the design review process. However, a complete analysis must list and analyze all approval procedures and decision -making criteria. The evaluation should address the impacts of these decision - making criteria on housing supply, cost, and particularly approval certainty. The analysis may discuss how the City mitigates potential impacts such as pre -application reviews, guidelines or objective standards. Based on the outcomes of an analysis, the element must add or modify programs to address identified constraints.

Constraints on Housing for Persons with Disabilities ( Reasonable Accommodation):

The element briefly describes the City' sreasonable accommodation procedures and includes a program to update the process. However, the element should also describe the decision - making criteria, application requirements, approval findings, fees, and analyze any potential constraints on housing for persons with disabilities. Based on a complete analysis, the element should add or modify program( s) to address any potential constraints.

B. Housing Programs

1. Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city' s or county' sshare of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph ( 3) of subdivision ( a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584. 09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory -built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single -room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. ( Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)( 1).)
As noted in Finding A1, the element does not include a complete site analysis, therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types.

In addition, Program 12 ( Zoning Ordinance Amendments) should commit to incorporate a definition of emergency shelters in the zoning ordinance to comply with Government City of Lathrop' s
6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 4
July 3, 2024
562
Code section 65583( a)( 4)( C). For your information, the definition of emergency shelters includes other interim interventions, including but not limited to, navigation centers, bridge housing, and respite or recuperative care.

2. The Housing Element shall contain programs which assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate - income households. ( Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)( 2).) Farmworkers: The element includes some general commitments to address farmworkers including complying with the Employee Housing Act (EHA) and broader outreach efforts. However, given the importance of farmworkers and the local and regional needs, the element must include specific and significant actions to address the needs of farmworkers that are responsive to the analysis. The element should include a program that specifically addresses issues of substandard housing for farmworkers including applying for funding, establishing or expanding existing programs related to rehabilitation, outreach and technical assistance with employers, and additional support such as expediated permitting, flexible development standards, gap funding, fee waivers, and applying for state and federal funding.

3. Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities. The program shall remove constraints to, and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabilities. ( Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)( 3).) As noted in Finding A2, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints.

4. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics... ( Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)( 5).) While the element includes some programs to address affirmatively furthering fair housing ( AFFH), this generally does not address respond to the analysis and to the identified and prioritized contributing factors. Goals and actions must be significant and meaningful enough to overcome identified patterns and trends. Actions must have specific commitments, milestones, geographic targeting and metrics or numerical targets and, as appropriate, address housing mobility enhancement ( housing choices and affordability across geographies), new housing choices and affordability in relatively higher opportunity or income areas, place -based strategies for community preservation and revitalization, and displacement protection.

City of Lathrop' s
6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 5
July 3, 2024
563
C. Public Participation
Local governments shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the Housing Element, and the element shall describe this effort. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)( 9).) While the element notes that public comments were collected and considered, it should also summarize the public comments and describe how they were considered and incorporated into the element. For additional information, see the Building Blocks at blocks/
https:// www. hcd. ca. gov/ planning- and- community- development/ housinq- elements/ buildingpublic- participation.

City of Lathrop' s6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 6 July 3, 2024
564
Response
to
HCD
h6`
Findings
Draft
Cycle (on2031) 2023-
Housing
Element
Finding
How
the
omment C
Was
Addressed
A. Housing
Needs,
Resources,
and
Constraints

1. An
inventory
of
land uit able s
and
ailable
av
for
residential
development,
including
vacant
sites
and
sites
having
realistic
and
redevelopment -
during
the
planning period
tomeet
the
locality' s
housing
need
for
adesignated
income
level,
and
an
analysis
and
public
facilities
and services
to
these
sites . (
Gov .

Code, §
65583,
ubd. ( s
a)( 3.)
Progress
inMeeting
the
Regional
Housing
Needs
Allocation (
RHNA):

The
number
of
pipeline
units
in
Table
4- 1
is
corrected.

Additional
information
is
pro vided
inChapter
4 of
theBackground
Approved
and
Pending
Projects
discussi
on
and
Table
2) 4-
to
availability
and
projected
affordability
of
units
in
approved
and
projects
during
the
planning
period .

The
element
notes
that
the
City
has
43 moderate
income
units
and
2, 795
above
moderate
income
units
in
the
pipeline
which
equates
to
units. Ho
2, 838
wever,
Table
4- 1 (
p.
91)
reflects
a
pipeline
of
2, 009 units. The
element
must
reconcile
this
information
and accurately
report
the
number
of
units
by
income category asprogress
towards
the
RHNA. Additionally,
the
element
is
crediting
several
pipeline
projects
towards
the
moderate
and
above -
moderate
RHNA.

The
element
includes
a
listing
of
the
project,
number
of
units,
status,
and
remaining
Ho
steps.
wever,
the
element
should
analyze
this
information
to
demonstrate
the
likelihood
that
these
units
will
be
available
during
the
planning
period.

To
demonstrate
the availability
of
units
within
the planning
period,
the
element
could
analyze
infrastructure
schedules,
the
City' s
co
past
mpletion
rates
on
pipeline
projects,
outreach
with developers,
and
should
describe
any
expiration
on
dates
entitlements,
anticipated
timelines
for
final
approvals,
and
any
remaining
steps
for
projects
to
receive
final
entitlements. Lastly,
the
City' s
RHNA
may
be
reduced
by
the
number
of
new
units
built
since
June
30,
2023;
however,
the
element
must
describe
the
City' s
methodology
for
assigning
these
units
to
the
various
income
groups
based
on
actual
or anticipated
sales
price
or
rent
lev
el
or
other
mechanisms
ensuring
affo
rdability ( g.
e.
deed -
restrictions).

Realistic
Capacity:

The
element
notes
that
the
City
is
assuming
80 The
discussion
of
realistic
capacity
is
updated
to
provide
additional
information
to
substantiate
the assumptions
used
for
residential
use
zones,
including
those
that
allow
nonresidential
uses .

Table
4-1
to
reflect
the
modified
assumptions.
percent
of
the
maximum
allowable
density
inmultifamily
zo
ning
districts. However,
this doassumption
es
not
appear
to
be
supported
by
past multifamily
trends
as
listed
in
Table
3-

19. For
example,
some
recent
multifamily
developments
appear
to
be
40-
1 565
Response
to
HCD
Findings
on
Draft
6th
Cycle (
2031) 223-
Housing
Element
Finding
How
the
Comment
Was
Addressed
60 percent
of
maximum
allowable
densities .

Further,
this
analysis
should
incorporate
the affordability
of
recent development .

The
element
should
either
supplement
the
analysis
with
additional
information
related
tomultifamily
and
higher
density
projects
or
rescale
assumptions
based
on
recent
multifamily
trends .

Additionally,
the
element
is
assuming
50 percent
of
maximum
densities
on
sites
that
allow
100
percent
nonresidential
uses (
p .
95).

While
the
element
indicates
the
City
has
made
conservative
assumptions,
the
element
still
should
analyze
the
likelihood
of
residential
development
zoin
ning
where
100
percent
nonresidential
uses
allowed.
are
The
analysis
should
be
based
on
factors
such
asdevelopment
trends
including
nonresidential, performance
standards
requiring
residential
uses
or
other
relevant
factors
such
as enhanced policies
programs. and
Suitability
No
of
nvacant
Sites:

The
element
is
relying
on
nonvacant
sites
to
accommodate
a
portion
of
RHNA.
the
The
element
notes
that
nonvacant
sites
include
city -
owned
properties
with
temporary
uses
that
will
be
redeveloped
and
sites
with
1- 2
residential
units
including
mobilehomes
that
are
50 percent
underutilized (
p.
96).

The
element
includes
a
high- level
statement
that
the
City
has
seen
redevelopment
trends
with
these
types
of
sites
and
existing uses.

First,
the
element
must
clearly
list
any
objective
criteria
used
to
identify
sites
including
the
actual
values
of
the
criteria
in
the
inv to
entory
relate
it
to
the
analysis
and
discuss
how
these facto
rs
are
indicative
rede
of
velopment
potential.

For example,
while
the
element
lists
the
existing
uses
in
the
sites
inventory (
Appendix
A),
it
did
not
quantify
the
degree
of
underutilization.

To
facilitate
an
analysis
demonstrating
potential
for
additional
development,
the
element
should
summarize
past experiences
converting
existing
uses
to
higher
density
residential develo
pment,
include
current
market
demand
for
the
existing
use,
provide
analysis
of
existing orcoleases
ntracts
that
would
perpetuate
the
existing
use
or
prevent
additional
residential
development,
include
Detailed
analysis
of
pr
ojects
on
underutilized/ nonvacant
sites,
4-
summarizing
development
activity
on
underutilized
sites
from
Cycle to
the
present
and
regional
development
trends
on
was
added
to
theBackground
Report.

The
analysis
addresses
development
trends
and
conditions,
demand
for
affordable
and
housing,
known
constraints,
and
incentives
f
or
development
of
sites.

Rather
than
discuss
the
ratio
of
existing
units
todeveloped
analysis
discusses
the
existing
densities
of
the
sites
and
the
built
the
sites.

Some
underutilized
sites
have
been
removed
from
the
and
Chapter
4,
including
Table
4- 1,
of
theBackground
Report
and
have
been
revised
accordingly.

Regarding
sites
with
existing
residential
uses,
the
H
ousing
Plan
Program
20, Replacement
Housing,
to
ensure
replacement
of
units
nonvacant
sites
as
set
forth
inGovernment
C
ode
Section
65915( c)(
2 566
Respoto
nse
HCD
6th
Findings
Draft
Cycle (on2031) 223-ousing H
Element
Finding
How
the
Comment Was
Addressed
current
information
developmentontrends
and
market
conditions
in
the
City
and
relate
those
trends
to
the
sites
identified .

For
example,
while
the
element
ovided
pr
few
project
examples,
it
provided
no
analysisdemonstrating the applicability
to
existing
uses
in
the
sites
inventory.

The
element
should
discuss
the
characteristics
of
those
project
examples (
e. g .,
existing
uses,
zoning,
affordability
level,
market
area)
and
consider
its
applicability
to
the
identified
sites.

Additionally,
theif
element
identifies
sites
with
existing
residential
uses.

Absent
a
replacement
housing
policy,
these
sites
are
not
adequate
sites
to
accommodate
lower -
income
househ olds . The
replacement
housing
policy
has
the
same
requirements
as
set
forth
inGovernment
Code
section
65915,
subdivision (
c),
paragraph (
3).

This
can
be
demonstrated
by
providing
substantial
evidence
that
the
existing
use
is
likely
tobe
discontinued
during
the
planning
Gov.
period (
Code, §
65583.
2,
subd. (
g)( 2. ).

Sites
Identified
from
Prior
Planning
Periods:

Sites
identified
in
prior
Program
3 in
the
Housing
Plan
is
revised
to
rezone
the
prior
co
nsistent
with
the
requirements
of
Government
Code
Section
planning
periods
shall
not
be
deemed
adequate
to
accommodate
ho
the
using
needs
lo
for
wer -
income
households
unless
a
program,
meeting
statutory
requirements,
requires
rezoning
within
the
timeframe
specified
inGovernment
Code
section 65583.
2( c).

The
element
should
clarify
if
sites
were
identified
in
prior
planning
periods
and
if
so,
which
sites
and
add
or modify
a
program
pursuant
to
Government
Code
section 65583.
2( c).

For
more
information
on
program
requirements,
please
see
HCD' s
Housing
3 567
Response ndings HCD
Fitoon
Draft
6th
Cycle (
2023-031)
Element
Housi ng
Finding
How
the
Comment
Was
Addressed
Element
Sites
Inventory
Guidebook
atwww. https://
hcd.caommunity-housing-gov/development/ element/ housing- element- memos/ docs/ site_ inventory_ fina106102020 . memo_ pdf.

Environmental
Constraints:

While
the
element
included
a
broad
The
analysis
ofnongovernmental
c
onstraints
is
updated
to
address
known
environmental
other
or
c
onstraints,
including
shape,
access,
easements,
onservation c
easements,
Williamson
Act
contracts,
materials,
and
other
constraints .
discussion
of
general
environmental
constraints,
it
sh
ould discuss
environmental
constraints
relative
to
identified
sites
and
describe
any
other
known
environmental
or
other constraints (
e .
g.,
shape,
access,
easements,
conservation
easements,
Williamson
Act
contracts,
airpomilitary,
rt
and
other compatibility,
contaminati
on)
that
could
impact
housing
development
on
identified
sites
in
the
planning
period.

Electronic
Sites
Inventory:

Pursuant
Gov
to
ernment
Code
section
Noted
and
submitted.

No
changes
are
made
to
the
inventory.
65583. subdiv
3,
ision (
b),
the
City
must
utilize
standards,
forms,
definitio
and
ns adopted
by
HCD
when
preparing
the
sites
inventory.

Please
see
HCD' s
housing
element
webpage
at
www. https://
ca. hcd
gov/ planning- and community- hodevelopment/
elements usingfor
a
copy
of
the
form
and
instructions. The
City
can
reach
out
to
HCD
at
sitesinventory@hcd. ca gov
for
technical
assistance.

Please
note,
uponadoption
of
the
housing
element,
the
City
must
submit
an
electronic
version
of
the
sites
inventory
with
its
adopted
housing
element sitesinventory@hcd. to
goca.
v.

2. An
analysis
of
potential
and
a ctual governmental
constraints
upon
themaintenance,
improvement,
or
development
of
housing
including
the
types
of
housing
identified
in
para
graph (
1)
ofsubdivision (
c),
and
for
persons
with
disabilities. .. .. .
la
nd
use
propermit
cedures... (
Gov.

Code, §
65583,
subd. (
a )(
5).)
Land
Use
Controls:

While
the
element
includes
a
listing
of
all
land
The
element
is
revised
to
provide
additional
analysis
of
standards
f
RI
zone
in
the
Constraints
section.

The
parking
analysis
is
revised
to
parking
requirements
onho
using
cost
and
supply.

Appendix
C
is
element
to
demonstrate
the
capacity
of
residential
and
mixed
use
including
MU -
RI,
to
accommodate
maximum
densities
and
and
parking
requirements
in
the
calculations.
use
controls
for
most
zones,
it
must
include
and
analyze
all
development
standards
fo
r
the
MU -
RI
zone
including
setback
requirements.

Lastly,
the shoelement
uld
evaluate
the
City' s
parking
requirements
aspotential
constraints
tomultifamily
development.

For example,
the
City
appears
to
require
greater
4 568
Response
to
HCD
Findings
on
Draft
h6`
Cycle (
2031) 2023-
Housing
Element
Finding
How
the
Comment
Was
Addressed
than
two
spaces
per
unit
f
multifamilyor uses
which
impacts
housing
costs
for
smaller
bedroom
types (
e .
g .,
studio
and
one
bedroom).

The
analysis
should
address
any
impacts
ost, onc
supply,
co
housing
st
and
ability
to
achieve
maximum
densities
and
include
programs
toaddress
identified
constraints.

Local
Processing
and
Permit
Procedures:

The
element
should
address
public
comments
on
this
revised
draft
submittal
and
co
discuss
mpliance
with
the
Permit
Streamlining
Act
and
intersections
with
CEQA
and
timing requirements,
including
streamlining
determinations
and
add
or modify
programs
as
appropriate.

The
discussion
of
the
City' s
processing
procedures
inChapter
3 of
Background
Report
is
revised
to
address
compliance
with
the
Streamlining
Act
and
consideration
of
CEQA requirements
within
deadlines .

Program
12, Paragraph
D,
addresses
establishing
ministerial
review
procedures
consistent
with
State
law.

No
Pr
ogram
12 are
necessary .

Design
Review:

The
element
includes
some
general
information
regarding
the
design
review
process.

However,
a
complete
analysis
must
list
and
analyze approall
val procedures
and
decision -
making
criteria.

The
evaluation
should
address
the
impacts
of
these
decision -
making
criteria
on
housing
supply,
cost,
and particularly
approval
certainty.

The
analysis
may
discuss
how
the
City
mitigates
potential
impacts
such
as
pre -
application
reviews,
guidelines
or objective
standards.

Based
on
the
outcomes
of
an
analysis,
the
element
must
add
or modify
programs
to
address
identified
constraints.

The
design
review
analysis
is
revised
to
m
ore
clearly
describe
design
procedures
and
findings
and
to
address
impacts
on
housing
supply,
approval
certainty.

Constraints
on
Housing
for
Persons
with Disabilities (
Reasonable
Accommodation):

The
element
briefly
describes
the
City' s
reasonable
accommodation
procedures
and
includes
a
program
to
update
the
process.

However,
the
element
should
also
describe
decisio
the
n - making
criteria,
application
requirements,
approval
findings,
fees,
and
analyze
any
potential
constraints
on
ho
using
for
persons
with
disabilities.

Based
on
a
complete
analysis,
the
element
should
add
or
modify
program( s)
to
address
any
potential
constraints.

Housing
Programs
The
reasonable
accommodation
discussion
is
updated
to
address
reasonable
accommodation
process,
required
findings,
and
the
constraints
for
persons
with
disabilities.

Program
12 in
the
Housing
revised
to
modify
the
findings
for
a
reasonable
accomm
odatin
5 569
Response
to
HCD
6t"
Findings
Draft
Cycle (on2031) 223-ousing H
Element
Finding
How
the
Comment Was
Addressed

1. Identify
th
will
beactionsat taken
to
make
sites
available
d
the
planniuring period
with ng
appropriate
zoning
and development
and
facilities
ommodate
to
acc that
portion
of
the
city' s
or
county' s
share
of
the
regional
housing
need
for
each
income
level
a
ccommodated
on
sites
identified
in
the
inventory
completed
ant
pursu
to
agraph (
par 3)
of
subdivisio a) n (
with out
rezo ning,
requirements
ofGovernme Code nt section
65584. 09 .

Sites
shall
be
identified
as
needed
to
facilitate
andencourage
the
housing
for
all
income
levels,
including ultifamily m
rental
housing,
factory -
built
housing,
mobilehomes,
housing
for agricultural
housing,
single -
room
occupancy
units, emergency
shelters,
and
transition
al housi
G
ng. ( ov .de, § C
65583,
subd. (
c)( 1.)
As
noted
in
Finding
A1,
the
element
does
not
include
a
complete
site
analysis,
therefore,
the adequacy
of
sites
and
zoning
were
ot n
established. Based
on
the
results
of
a
complete
sites
invent
andory
analysis,
the
City
may
need
to
add
or
revise
programs
to
address
a
shortfall
of
sites
or
zoning
available
toencourage
a
variety
of
housing
types.

In
addition,
Program
12 (
Zoning
Ordinance
Amendments)
should
commit
inco
to
rporate
adefinition
ofemergency
shelters
in
the
zoning
ordinance
to
comply
with
Government
Code
section
65583( a)( 4 C.

For
your
information,
the
definition
ofemergency
shelters
includes
other
interim
interventions,
including
but
not
limited
to,
navigation
centers,
bridge
housing,
and
respite
or
recuperative
care.

The
sites
analysis
is
updated
asdescribed
under
Section
A
above.
in
the
Housing
Plan
ismodified
to
ensure
adequate
lower
income
maintained
in
the
River
Island/ West
Lathrop
Specific
Plan
and
Specific
Plan
assist
to
inaccommodating
the
lower
income
RHNA .

Program
12 is
revised
to
ensure
that
the
Zoning
Ordinance
specifies
Government
Code
definition
ofemergency
shelter .

2. The
Housing
Element
shall
contain
programs
which
assist
in
the development
of
adequate
h
ousing
to
meet
the
needs
of
moderate -
income
households. (
Gov.

Code, §
65583,
subd. (
c)( 2.)
Farmworkers:

The
element
includes
some
cogeneral
mmitments
Housing
Plans
Program
1 and
2 are
revised
to
specify
actions
to
construction,
rehabilitation,
and preservation
of
farmworker
provide
quantified
objectives
for
farmworker
housing.
to
address
farmworkers
including
complying
with
the Emplo
yee
Housing
Act (
EHA)
and
broader
efforts. outreach
However,
given
the impo of
rtance
farmworkers
and
the
local
and
regional
needs,
the
element
must
include
specific
and significant
actions
to
address
the
needs
of
farmworkers
that
are
responsive
to
the
analysis. The
element
sho
uld
include
a
program
that specifically
addresses
issues
of
substandard
housing
for
farmworkers
including
applying
for
funding,
establishing
or expanding
existing
programs
related
to
rehabilitation,
outreach
and
technical
assistance
with
6 570
Response
to
HCD
Findings
on
Draft
6th
Cycle (
2031) 2023-ousing H
Element
Finding
How
the
Comment
Was
Addressed
employers,
and
additional
support
such
asexpediated
permitting,
flexible
development
standards,
gap
funding,
fee
waivers,
and
applying
for
state
and
federal
funding.

3. Address
and,
where
appropriate
and
legally
possible,
remove
over g
nmental and nongovernmental
constraints
to
the
development
of
housing,
including
housing
f
all
income or levels
and
housing
for
with
pers
ons
disabilities.

Theprogram
shall
provide
reasonable
accommod ations for
housing
desig
ned for,
intended
foroccupancy
by,
or
with supportive
services
for,
Code, § subd. ( 65583,
c)( 3.)
As
noted
in
Finding
A2,
the
element
requires
a
complete
analysis
of
potential
governmental
constraints.

Depending
upon
the
results
of
that
analysis,
the
City
may
need
to
revise
addorprograms
and
address
remo
and
ve
or
mitigate
any
identified
constraints .

Programs
are
revised
asdiscussed
above.

4. Promote
a
nd
a
ffirmatively
further
fair
housing
opportunities
and promote
housing
throughout
the community
or
communities
race,
religion, sex , marital
status,
ancestry,
national
origin,
color,
familial
status,
or disability,
and
other characteristics... (
Gov.

While
the
element
includes
some
programs
to
address
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing (
AFFH),
this generally
does
not
address
respond
to
the
analysis
and
to
the
identified
and
prioritized
contributing
factors.

Goals
and
actions
must
be
significant
and meaningful
enough
to
overcome
identified
patterns
and
trends.

Actions
must
have
specific
commitments,
milestones,
geographic
targeting
and
metrics
or numerical
targets
and,
as
appropriate,
address
housing
mobility
enhancement (
housing
choices
and affordability
across
geographies),
new
housing
choices
and affordability
in
relatively
higher
opportunity
or
income
areas,
place -
based
strategies
for community
preservation
and
revitalization,
and displacement
protection.

C. Public Participation
govLocal
ernments
shall
a make
diligent
effort
to
a
chieve
public participation
Element,
and
the
element
shall
describe
this effort. (
Gov.

Co
de, §
65583, Program
22 (
Table
1)
is
revised
to
enhance
AFFH
programs
and
acti
ensure
that
specific
commitments,
milestones,
geographic
metrics
are
provided
to
address
housing
mobility
enhancement (
choices
and affordability
across
geographies),
new
housing
choices
affordability
in
relatively
higher
opportunity
or
income
areas,
place -
strategies
for community
preservation
and
revitalization,
and
protection.
of
all
economic
segments
of
the community
in
the
subd.( c)( 9.)
While
the
element
notes
that
public
comments
were
collected
and
considered,
it
should
also
summarize
the
public
comments
and
Two
comments
were
received
by
the
City
on
the
Housing
Element.
comments
are
addressed
inChapter
5 of
theBackground
Report .
7 571
Response to
HCD
Findings
on
Draft
6th
Cycle (
2031) 2023-
Housing
Element Finding
the
Comment
HowWas
Addressed
describe
how
they
were
considered
and
incorporated
into
the element. For
additional
information,
see
the
Building
Blocks
athcd. https:// www.gov/and-community-ca.planning- participatio development/ housing- elements/ building- blocks/ public- n. 8 572
ATTACHMENT " 5 "

CITY OF LATHROP
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 24- 18

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LATHROP RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE 2022 GENERAL PLAN TO REPLACE THE ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT WITH THE 6TH

CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT
WHEREAS, Sections 65580 through 65589. 8ofthe California Government Code require each jurisdiction to regularly update its Housing Element in accordance with deadlines established by the State; and
WHEREAS, the City held a community workshop on April 25, 2023 to introduce the 6th Cycle Housing Element update effort to provide the community and interested agencies with an opportunity to identify priorities and concerns related to the provision of housing; and WHEREAS, the City made the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element available for public review from February 12, 2024 through March 13, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City held public workshops on February 27, 2024 and February 29, 2024 to provide the community and interested parties with an opportunity to learn about the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element and comment on the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element; and WHEREAS, comments received on the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element were summarized and addressed in the Draft Housing Element Update to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for HCD for state -mandated review; WHEREAS, HCD identified revisions to the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element that were necessary to comply with state law in a written letter dated July 3, 2024; and WHEREAS, proposed revisions were made to the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element to address HCD' sfindings; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Element has been reviewed and analyzed by the City pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has determined that the 6th Cycle Housing Element is consistent with the 2022 General Plan and is within the scope ofthe final General Plan EIR ( SCH# 2021100139), that no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15168( c)( 2), and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168( c)( 5), no further environmental documentation is required; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on December 18, 2024 regarding the Housing Element Update, including the changes requested by HCD, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered all evidence submitted in connection with the Housing Element Update, including the staff report, public testimony, and all other documents and evidence that are part of the City administrative record for these actions; and,
Planning Commission Resolution 24- 18 Page 1 of 5
573
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the goals, policies, programs, and objectives contained in the 6th Cycle Housing Element, considered individually and cumulatively, do not adversely affect the internal consistency of the City of Lathrop General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has utilized its own independent judgment in considering the information contained in this resolution and attachments, in the staff report and attachments and other exhibits, and in written and oral testimony during the public hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lathrop Planning Commission, pursuant to the Lathrop Municipal Code, upon evidence in the staff report and project file, makes the following findings to support the CEQA documentation:

1. That the above recitals are true and correct.

2. That the Planning Commission does hereby find the Finding of Consistency attached to this Resolution as " Attachment 4" has been prepared and completed in compliance with CEQA.

3. The Planning Commission was presented with, and has independently reviewed and analyzed the General Plan EIR ( consisting of the General Plan Draft EIR dated May 2022 and the Final EIR dated August 2022) and other information in the record and has considered the information contained therein, including the written and oral comments received at the public hearings on the CEQA determination and the Project, prior to acting upon or approving the Project, and has found that the Finding of Consistency represents the independent judgment ofthe City of Lathrop (" City") as lead agency for the Project, and designates the Community Development Director, at 390 Towne Centre Drive, Lathrop, California, 95330, as the custodian of documents and record of proceedings on which the decision of the City is based.

4. The Planning Commission does hereby find that none of the conditions calling for preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR have occurred, specifically none of the following criteria described at CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred:
a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any ofthe following:

Planning Commission Resolution 24- 18 Page 2 of 5
574
i. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

5. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend and recognize that the 6th Cycle Housing Element is within the scope of the 2022 General Plan and the General Plan EIR, including the Addendum, and that no further environmental documents are required.

NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Lathrop Planning Commission, pursuant to the Lathrop Municipal Code, upon evidence in the staff report and project file, makes the following findings to support the recommendation of approval of the 6th Cycle Housing Element project, including approval of a resolution recommending to adopt the 6th Cycle Housing Element as revised to the City Council:

1. The proposed 6th Cycle Housing Element contains a thorough and adequate treatment ofhousing issues required to be addressed by State law and adequately addresses each ofthe HCD findings. The amendment to the 2022 General Plan will adopt the 6th Cycle Housing Element and will replace the 2019 Housing Element with the 6th Cycle Housing Element.

2. The proposed 6th Cycle Housing Element is internally consistent with the 2022 General Plan and is not a detriment to the public interest, health, safety, and welfare of the City.

3. The proposed 6th Cycle Housing Element has been prepared to substantially comply with State Housing Element Law and has been revised to address the findings identified by HCD in its letter dated July 3, 2024.

4. Based on substantial evidence provided in the Housing Element, including a Statewide housing crisis, strong demand for residential and mixed -use development in the City, historical regional and local development trends of underutilized sites, historical regional and local development trends of sites that allow non- residential uses, opportunities for streamlined infill development, unique site characteristics including low lot utilization, improvement -to -land value ratios, and relatively low improvement values, and a commitment from the City to implement programs that incentivize and promote the development of sites, including redevelopment or intensification of Planning Commission Resolution 24- 18 Page 3 of 5
575
underutilized sites and development of City -owned sites, the Planning Commission finds that the existing uses on the underutilized sites identified to accommodate the City' s
RHNA do not impede residential development during the period covered by the Housing Element, that the sites that allow non- residential uses are likely to accommodate a portion of the RHNA, and that the sites identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element are anticipated to be available for development during the Housing Element period.

5. The proposed 6th Cycle Housing Element includes a wide variety of objectives, policies, and implementing programs designed to enhance the public health, safety, and welfare, including the goals, policies, and programs to support safe and decent housing, to maintain, rehabilitate, and preserve housing, to increase housing choice, to encourage the development of a variety of housing types and locations to meet the needs of all income levels and the needs of special needs populations, and to affirmatively further fair housing.

6. The 6th Cycle Housing Element project was prepared in accordance with the California Government Code and the California Environmental Quality Act.

7. The Planning Commission recommends that the Community Development Director be authorized to make minor modifications to the Housing Element to achieve certification and address comments provided by the Department of Housing and Community Development on this Housing Element, provided that the modifications would not exceed the total amount of development accommodated by the 2022 General Plan prior to revisions and would not result in new actions by the City that would require a General Fund commitment of $75, 000or greater.

Planning Commission Resolution 24- 18 Page 4 of 5
576
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City ofLathrop at a regular meeting on the 18th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: Ralmilay, Jackson, Camarena, Rhodes, Ishihara
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Ash Ralmilay, Chair
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

RladiaL Caguiat, Secretary Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 71aL -Prr
Planning Commission Resolution 24- 18 Page 5 of 5
577
ATTACHMENT "
Finding of Consistency - 6th Cycle Housing Element
CEQA Guidelines Section 15168( c)( 2)
Project Title: 6th Cycle Housing Element Update, GPA 24- 159 Project Location: City of Lathrop, city- wide
Project Applicant: City of Lathrop
Public Agency Approving and Carrying Out the Project: City of Lathrop Description of the Project:

The proposed project includes an amendment to the 2022 General Plan. The Project will replace the Housing Element of the 2022 General Plan with the 61h Cycle Housing Element Update.

The proposed project is within the scope of the adopted certified Environmental Impact Report for the Lathrop General Plan Update, SCH# 2021100139 ( General Plan EIR).

The certified General Plan EIR was completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. The above - described project has been evaluated under CEQA to determine whether changes in the project, circumstances, or information would trigger the need for any supplemental environmental documentation based on new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts.

The General Plan EIR anticipated that subsequent activities would occur to implement the 2022 General Plan, including but not limited to, future Specific Plan approvals, Planned Unit Development approvals, Master Plan approvals, revisions to the Zoning Ordinance, and development plan approvals, such as tentative subdivision maps, variances, conditional use permits, and other land use permits.

The proposed project updates the Housing Element to address current requirements of State law and to remove inconsistencies between the 2022 General Plan and the Housing Element adopted in 2019. The proposed project updates the City' sinventory of residential sites to be consistent with the sites identified by the 2022 General Plan for residential and mixed use. The proposed project does not approve or entitle any development applications. The proposed project does not change the location or intensity of potential development in the City and would not result in environmental impacts beyond those disclosed in the General Plan EIR.

After a thorough factual evaluation, the City of Lathrop has determined that no further supplemental environmental review is required because: (1) the proposed project is consistent with the original project; (2) the proposed project implements the original project in order to bring the allowed densities, allowed uses, and sites designated for residential development identified in the Housing Element into consistency with the range of uses and density and intensity of development anticipated for the original project; (3) the proposed project does not propose substantial changes to the original 578
Finding of Consistency — 6th Cycle Housing Element
CEQA Guidelines Section 15168( c)( 2)
project; (4) the proposed project will not involve substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the original project was undertaken, which would require major revisions to the previously - certified EIR due to the involvement of new or substantially more severe significant impacts; and ( 5) no substantially important new information requiring new analysis of significant effects, mitigation, or alternatives is known that would require major revisions to the previously - certified EIR due to the proposed project.

The City finds that no further environmental documentation is required because all potentially significant effects ( a) have been analyzed adequately in the previously certified EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and ( b) have been avoided or mitigated to the extent feasible pursuant to the previously certified EIR. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines ( Section 15168( c)( 2)), the project is within the scope of the previously certified EIR; the EIR continues to be pertinent with considerable information value; and such General Plan amendments to update the Housing Element do not give rise to any new or substantially more severe significant effects, nor do they require any new mitigation measures or alternatives. Accordingly, no new environmental document is required.
579

PAGE LEFT

INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
580
ITEM 5. 3

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 10, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: OUT OF STATE TRAVEL APPROVAL FOR THE 2025

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ( SJCOG)

ONE VOICE TRIP
RECOMMENDATION: Council to Discuss and Consider Adopting a Resolution Authorizing Out of State Travel for the
2025 San Joaquin One Voice Trip to Washington,
D. C. from May 18- 22, 2025, and Approval of Related
Budget Amendment
BACKGROUND:

Over the past several years, City officials have participated in approximately nineteen ( 19) San Joaquin One Voice visits to Washington D. C., to promote jurisdictional projects and needs. This year, the conference will be held from May 18, 2025 through May 22, 2025.

State law requires Council approval for all out of state travel. Additionally, commencing with the FY 2012- 13 budget process, Council voted to eliminate the One Voice Trip expense from the City Council' s budget. The same was done for subsequent fiscal years. The travel funds were removed from the Council budget with the notion that if Council elected to have Councilmembers attend this event, a budget amendment would be required depending on the selected option.

The City Manager' stravel budget was kept unchanged; therefore, if Council elects to send the City Manager to attend this event, funds are available in the current budget. If Councilmembers are interested in attending, the following options are available for consideration.

Options Include Cost Budget
Amendment

1. Send 2 Council Members & City Manager Approx. $16, 200 Approx. $10, 800

2. Send 1 Council Member & City Manager Approx. 510, 80 Approx. S5, 400

3. Send 1 Council Member Approx. 65, 400 Approx. $5, 400

4. Send City Manager Approx. S5, 400 None

5. Do not send representatives in 2025 None None
This report identifies estimated costs to attend the One Voice visit this year. * The proposed cost estimate is based on average from those that attended the 2024 One Voice trip.
581

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 10, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
2025 ONE VOICE TRIP OUT OF STATE TRAVEL
PAGE 2
This trip assists with promoting regional projects that align with the San Joaquin Council of Governments' themed concepts of Environmental Sustainability, Trade Corridors, Innovation, Technology Growth Management, and Social Equity and Mobility. Therefore, during the December 9, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting, the City Council approved the Louise Avenue and Interstate 5 Project, CIP PS 06- 06, as the City of Lathrop submittal for the 2025 San Joaquin Council of Governments One Voice Project Nominations. The City will pursue approximately

26. 6 Million for design, right -of -away acquisition, and construction.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Depending on the direction provided by the City Council, a budget amendment from the General Fund Reserves to the City Council Training and Travel Account ( Fund 1010-1- 10- 435- 20- 00) will be required to fund the cost of travel. The budget amendment amount may vary depending on the option selected by City Council.

The SJCOG has confirmed that they will reimburse the Delegate Board Member for the following:
50% of airfare and hotel expenses.
100% of ride -share, mileage, or taxi services.

Per diems will be covered ($ 10 for breakfast, $15 for lunch, and $ 30 for dinner), based upon SJCOG' spolicy.

Certain expenses, such as flight upgrades, additional hotel nights beyond the specified group rate period ( May 18 - 22, 2025), and rental cars are not reimbursed by SJCOG. The 2025 Regional Committee Appointment for Calendar Year 2025 assigned to the San Joaquin Council of Governments - Board of Directors is Mayor Akinjo who serves as Chair of the Board.

Options Include Cost Budget
Amendment

1. Send 2 Council Members & City Manager Approx. $16, 200 Approx. 510, 80

2. Send 1 Council Member & City Manager Approx. $10, 800 Approx. 55, 400

3. Send 1 Council Member Approx. S5, 400 Approx. S5, 400

4. Send City Manager Approx. 55, 400 None

5. Do not send representatives in 2024 None None
ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution Authorizing Out -of -State Travel Approval for the 2025 San Joaquin Council of Governments ( SJCOG) One Voice Trip
B. San Joaquin One Voice 2025 Registration Information
582

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
FEBRUARY 10, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
2025 ONE VOICE TRIP OUT OF STATE TRAVEL
APPROVALS:
esa Vargas
vernment Services Director &
City Clerk
Ca
Financ- Director
PAGE 3
Date
024/ aoas
Date
Z/ JZvz'
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
2 % to%2D1
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Stepp 1 J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
583
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP

AUTHORIZING OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN ONE VOICE TRIP TO WASHINGTON, D. C. FROM MAY 18, 2025 TO MAY 22, 2025, AND

APPROVING RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, over the past several years, City officials have participated in approximately nineteen San Joaquin One Voice visits to Washington D. C., to promote jurisdictional projects and needs; and
WHEREAS, in previous years, the Mayor, Council Members, and the City Manager have participated on the trip; and
WHEREAS, commencing with FY 2012- 13 budget process, Council approved to eliminate the One Voice expense from the City Council' sbudget. At that time, it estimated a savings of $ 3, 500 for that fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the travel funds for subsequent fiscal years were also removed from the Council budget with the notion that if Council elected to have City Council Members attend the One Voice legislative event, a budget amendment would be required depending on the selected option; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager' stravel budget was kept unchanged, therefore, if Council elects to send the City Manager to attend this years' One Voice legislative event, funds are available; and
WHEREAS, the following options were considered by Council:

Options Include Cost Budget
Amendment

1. Send 2 Council Members & City Manager Approx. $16, 200 Approx. $10, 800

2. Send 1 Council Member & City Manager Approx. $10, 800 Approx. $5, 400

3. Send 1 Council Member Approx. $ 5, 400 Approx. $ 5, 400

4. Send City Manager Approx. 55, 400 None

5. Do not send representatives in 2025 None None
Resolution No. 25-
584
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop discussed the matter and hereby approves option # , to have City and Council participant( s) attend the 2025 One Voice legislative event in Washington, D. C.; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop approve the corresponding budget amendment based on the selected option, from the General Fund Reserves to the City Council training and travel account:

Option # Budget Amendment Fund Account
1 10, 800
4 2
3 S5, 400
N/ A
5, 400
1010-1- 10- 435- 20- 0
5 N/ A
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 10th day of February 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Resolution No. 25-
585
Accommodations:

A room block is reserved at the Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill for May 18- 22, 2025. (There is a highly limited number of rooms for those who want to arrive Saturday, May 17th). SJCOG has negotiated a group rate of $ 349 or $ 364 ( plus applicable taxes) for single and double occupancy. Rooms are first come, first serve.

Link:

Group Name:

Group Code:

Hotel Name and Address:

Click to book a room
San Joaquin Council of Governments

G- JOAA
Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill
400 New Jersey Ave NW Washington, DC, District of Columbia 20001 Sunday
May 18
Monday
May 19
Tuesday
May 20
Wednesday
May 21
ETINGS
Thursday
May 22
csr
Participant and Guest Contact Information:

Name: Title:

Organization:

Address: City:

Email: Phone:

Guest Name: CeII Phone:

Registration fees are $ 325 per participant and $ 75. 00 per guest. Materials, all breakfasts, and the Wednesday evening reception are included. If your guest will not be participating in the events, no registration is required.

Participation fees are due on or before April 21. The registration fee is waived for SJCOG Board members.

Amount Enclosed: $
Cancellation Policy: No refund of registration fees for all cancellations after April 25, 2025.

San Joaquin Council of Governments • 555 East Weber Avenue • Stockton, California 95202 Phone:

One Voice®
209-35- 0444 •
is a
Fax: 209-35- 0438 • Email: onevoice@sjcog. org
registered trademark of the San 586
Joaquin Council of Governments

Lathrop City CouncilFebruary 10, 2025

Lathrop City Council
February 10, 2025