RESOLUTION 2025-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN
APPROVING AND DESIGNATING THE VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE(S) TO THE 2025-26 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE
WHEREAS, the 2025/26 League of California Cities Annual Conference is scheduled for October 8 – 10, 2025 and will be held at the Long Beach Convention Center; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Holly Andreatta and Mayor Pro Tem Ben Brown will be attending the Annual Conference on behalf of the City of Lincoln; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy; and
WHEREAS, our City’s appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing our city and votes on resolutions; and
WHEREAS, in order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate and may appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lincoln does hereby designate and authorize the City of Lincoln’s voting delegate as Mayor Andreatta and alternate as Mayor Pro Tem Brown.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
173
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org
DATE: Wednesday, July 16, 2025
TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers
RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 8-10, 2025 Long Beach Convention Center
Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.
Taking place on Oct. 10, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.
To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.
Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.
Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 24. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.
Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.
Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website.
Council Action Advised by September 24, 2025
174
For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.
Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.
Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.
Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.
The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 8, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 9, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 10, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting.
The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.
Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.
Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 24. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].
A
ttachments:
• General Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly 175
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org
General Assembly Voting Guidelines
1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.
2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.
3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.
4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.
5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.
6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.
7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.
176
Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.
How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.
The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.
The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.
Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.
Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.
Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.
Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.
The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.
Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.
Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.
During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.
Cal Cities policy
development is a member-
informed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.
For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.
General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.2
During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f). 177
SUBJECT:
Treasurer's Report for the Period Ending June 30, 2025. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY:
Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT:
Finance
DATE:
August 26, 2025
Item Number 7.H
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the City’s Unaudited Treasurers Report for the month ended June 30, 2025
,
in
compliance with Government Code Government Codes 53600.3, 53607 & 53630 through 53683 and as outlined in the City’s Investment Policy.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
The City of Lincoln has four investment holdings:
US Bank- Under the care of PFM Investment Management who under the direction of the City Manager and Finance Director direct investment activity in order to both comply with the city’s investment policy, ensure fiscal sustainability and to maximize long-term earnings on behalf of the City. Funds in excess of the City’s immediate cash needs and reserves on hand (held in LAIF) are invested with PFM, held by US Bank.
OPEB Trust- A Section 115 Trust to fund the future retiree healthcare liability. Funds are currently invested with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), held by US Bank.
PARS Pension – A Section 115 Trust to contribute to the Unfunded Pension Liability.
Funds are currently invested with PARS, held by US Bank.
LAIF- Managed by the California State Treasurer, the City keeps the majority of its pooled cash within the LAIF account. This investment is fully liquid and serves as the City’s primary cash resource to cover City expenses in excess of funds held in the City’s
STAFF REPORT
178
general checking account.
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
As of
June 30, 2025,
investment accounts contained the following activity and balances:
Investments
US Bank
OPEB PARS
Pension
PARS
LAIF
Total
Balance
05/31/2025
$163,992,845.21
$18,021,958.322
$3,583,072.64
$24,423,066.08
$210,020,942.25
Interest/Dividends
Earned
336,363.94
57,886.38
11,531.13
405,781,45
Gains/(Losses)
on Investment
9,016.77
0.00 0.00
9,016.77
Unrealized
Gains/(Losses) on
Investment
765,803.67
514,924.01
102,122.36
1,382,850.04
Net accrued
Income
144,315.66
(69.30)
(13.95)
144,232.41
Fees
(674.87)
(6,546.88)
(1,299.98)
(8,521.73)
Balance June 30,
2025
$165,247,670.38
$18,588,152.53
$3,695,412.20
$24,423,066.08
$211,954,301.19
The investment balances available are more than sufficient to allow the City to meet its expenditure obligations and requirements for the next six months. The attached reports comply with the City of Lincoln Investment Policy and the California Government Codes 53600.3, 53607 & 53630 through 53683.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - US Bank June 2025.pdf
Attachment B - PARS OPEB.pdf
Attachemnt C - PARS Pension.pdf
179
600 SIXTH STREET
LINCOLN, CA 95648
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
This statement is for the period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 Questions?
If you have any questions regarding your account or this statement, please contact your Account Manager.
Account Manager:
ROYA KHAIRZADA
633 W. 5TH STREET, 24TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
Phone: 213-615-6804
E-mail: [email protected]
DTATDTDADFAFFTDAFFFFAAADTAAFATDDAFTFADATFFADFFTTTDFTADTTTTDFADDAD 000023923 45 SP 000638998232139 S
180
1010101010101010101010110011010101010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001010110111
11010100001001001110
11000100100001001101
10110011000101010100
10010001110100110101
11010100001011111100
11000110010111110101
10000000110010001000
11001001111110001011
10000010001000010100
10100000011101000111
10001101101011100000
10000010111111110001
10110101110111001110
11000101011000010101
10101011010010000010
11111111111111111111
Market And Cost Reconciliation 3
Cash Reconciliation 4
Asset Summary 5
Asset Detail 6
Income Accrual Detail 26
Investment Activity 36
Plan Expenses 44
Purchases 45
Sales And Maturities 48
Bond Summary 53
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 ......................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
SchedulePage
TABLE OF CONTENTS
181
Interest 336,363.94 336,363.94
Realized Gain/Loss9,016.779,016.77
Change In Unrealized Gain/Loss 765,803.67.00
Net Accrued Income (Current-Prior) 144,315.66 144,315.66 Trust Fees- 674.87- 674.87
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 06/30/202506/30/2025
MARKET BOOK VALUE
Beginning Market And Cost 163,992,845.21 161,539,905.45 Investment Activity
Total Investment Activity 1,255,500.04 489,696.37 Plan Expenses
Total Plan Expenses- 674.87- 674.87
Net Change In Market And Cost 1,254,825.17 489,021.50 Ending Market And Cost 165,247,670.38 162,028,926.95
MARKET AND COST RECONCILIATION
182
1010101010101010101010110011010100010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001000110
11000100100001011001
10110011000101111100
10010001110000011111
11010100001110011100
11000110001111011101
10000000111000111000
11001001110010100011
10000011011100000000
10100111111010010111
10001111111001101000
10011011101101100111
10100111010100110010
11011011011110110101
10101000110010101010
11111111111111111111
Interest 336,363.94
Cash Equivalent Purchases- 417,816.23
Purchases- 3,093,315.02
Cash Equivalent Sales1,358,821.42
Sales/Maturities2,956,579.96
Trust Fees- 674.87
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 Beginning Cash- 1,139,959.20
Investment Activity
Total Investment Activity 1,140,634.07
Plan Expenses
Total Plan Expenses- 674.87
Net Change In Cash 1,139,959.20
Ending Cash.00
CASH RECONCILIATION
183
EstimatedAnnualIncomeisanestimateprovidedforinformationalpurposesonly andshouldnotbereliedonformakinginvestment,trading,ortaxdecisions.The estimatesmaynotrepresenttheactualvalueearnedbyyourinvestmentsand theyprovidenoguaranteeofwhatyourinvestmentsmayearninthefuture.
Cash And Equivalents 379,886.79 379,886.79 0.23 U.S. Government Issues 105,332,127.43 102,592,732.68 63.74 Corporate Issues 54,276,541.78 53,831,830.60 32.85 Foreign Issues 3,999,390.50 3,964,753.00 2.42 Accrued Income 1,259,723.88 1,259,723.88 0.76
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 06/30/202506/30/2025% OF
ASSETSMARKETBOOK VALUEMARKET
Total Assets 163,987,946.50 160,769,203.07 99.24 Grand Total 165,247,670.38 162,028,926.95 100.00 Estimated Annual Income 5,758,748.36
ASSET SUMMARY
ASSET SUMMARY MESSAGES
BONDS
184
1010101010101010101010110011010011010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001010010
11000100100000110101
10110011000101110100
10010001110010010001
11010100001011100010
11000110001100011101
10000000100001101000
11001001010110011011
10000010001011000100
10100111001111100111
10001010011010111000
10000000001001110011
10110000110001001010
11011110011100101101
10101001010010101010
11111111111111111111
First Am Govt 379,886.790 379,886.79 379,886.79.00815.37 3.95 Ob Fd Cl Y1.0000.00
31846V203 Asset Minor Code 1
F H L B Deb 3,900,000.000 3,773,874.00 3,615,180.00 158,694.0015,610.83 1.14
1.100% 8/20/2696.766011,817.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA+
Moodys Rating: Aa1
3130ANMH0 Asset Minor Code 22
F N M A Gtd 996,506.590 976,227.68 931,694.7444,532.942,625.79 3.23 Remic 3.162% 6/25/2797.96503,620.67
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3136AX7E9 Asset Minor Code 30
F N M A Gtd 1,084,176.470 1,059,121.15 1,009,596.9849,524.172,768.26 3.14 Remic 3.064% 9/25/2797.68902,640.56
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3136AY6X6 Asset Minor Code 30
F N M A Gtd 1,408,825.330 1,409,078.92 1,384,941.3324,137.594,919.15 4.19 Remic 4.190% 7/25/28 100.01806,888.09
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3136BQDE6 Asset Minor Code 30
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
FACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET Money Markets
Total Money Markets 379,886.790 379,886.79 379,886.79.00815.37 3.95 .00
Total Cash And Equivalents 379,886.790 379,886.79 379,886.79.00815.37 3.95 .00
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
ASSET DETAIL
DESCRIPTION
Cash And Equivalents
US Government Issues
185
F H L M C 770,000.000 760,667.60 731,500.0029,167.602,190.01 3.45 Mltcl Mtg 3.413% 12/25/2698.78801,971.20
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137BUX60 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 885,000.000 869,291.25 828,892.3840,398.872,355.58 3.25 Mltcl Mt 3.194% 7/25/2798.22503,575.40
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
3137FAWS3 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,000,000.000 988,660.00 930,312.5058,347.503,000.00 3.64 Mltcl Mt 3.600% 1/25/2898.86604,640.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137F4D41 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,500,000.000 1,527,090.00 1,501,289.0625,800.946,023.75 4.73 Mltcl 4.819% 6/25/28 101.80607,035.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HACX2 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,506,118.510 1,518,393.38 1,506,080.8412,312.545,995.59 4.74 Mltcl Mt 4.777% 6/25/28 100.81504,285.55
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HAD45 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,500,000.000 1,521,825.00 1,477,810.5044,014.505,812.50 4.58 Mltcl Mtg 4.650% 8/25/28 101.45507,905.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HAMH6 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,400,000.000 1,424,094.00 1,369,289.6054,804.405,530.00 4.66 Mltcl 4.740% 8/25/28 101.72107,364.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HAQ74 Asset Minor Code 30
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
186
1010101010101010101010110011010010010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000010111
11010100001001010110
11000100100000011001
10110011000101101100
10010001110011100111
11010100001001010010
11000110001001110101
10000000100110101000
11001001011011100011
10000010100001010000
10100000010001101111
10001011111111110100
10000011010101000011
10100010011010001110
11010010111011000101
10101011010010101010
11111111111111111111
F H L M C 1,380,000.000 1,408,345.20 1,336,001.4672,343.745,577.50 4.75 Mltcl 4.850% 9/25/28 102.05406,141.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HAST4 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,095,000.000 1,109,224.05 1,105,948.913,275.144,171.95 4.51 Mltcl Mtg 4.572% 12/25/28 101.29906,361.95
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HBLV4 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 670,000.000 688,016.30 668,063.0319,953.272,830.19 4.94 Mltcl 5.069% 10/25/28 102.68902,525.90
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HB3D4 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,055,000.000 1,078,062.30 1,051,968.9926,093.314,272.75 4.76 Mltcl Mtg 4.860% 10/25/28 102.18606,414.40
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HB3G7 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,000,000.000 1,033,440.00 1,009,570.3123,869.694,316.67 5.01 Mltcl Mtg 5.180% 3/25/29 103.34405,990.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HCKV3 Asset Minor Code 30
F H L M C 1,370,000.000 1,388,179.90 1,382,814.985,364.925,186.59 4.48 Mltcl Mtg 4.543% 7/25/29 101.32708,466.60
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HDXL9 Asset Minor Code 30
FHLMC Remic 535,000.000 541,623.30 545,689.30- 4,066.00.00 0.00 Series 0.00001% 6/25/29 101.23803,520.30
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HFNZ4 Asset Minor Code 30
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
187
FHLMC Remic 535,000.000 539,836.40 534,981.284,855.12.00 0.00 Series 0.00001% 1/25/30 100.90403,472.15
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
3137HKXJ8 Asset Minor Code 30
U S Treasury 4,000,000.000 3,715,000.00 3,378,437.50 336,562.503,369.57 0.54 Nt 0.500% 10/31/2792.875024,200.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CAU5 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 4,560,000.000 4,269,847.20 3,959,380.62 310,466.5814,327.87 1.33 Nt 1.250% 3/31/2893.637027,451.20
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CBS9 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,380,000.000 1,287,388.20 1,199,144.5388,243.671,461.07 1.34 Nt 1.250% 5/31/2893.28908,790.60
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CCE9 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury.000.00.00.00.00 0.00
Nt 0.750% 5/31/2697.05508,456.99
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CCF6 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,000,000.000 1,861,960.00 1,716,093.75 145,866.2567.93 1.34 Nt 1.250% 6/30/2893.098012,820.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CCH2 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,075,000.000 1,037,084.75 1,041,322.26- 4,237.512,802.57 0.65 Nt 0.625% 7/31/2696.47304,246.25
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CCP4 Asset Minor Code 21
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
188
1010101010101010101010110011010001010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000011111
11010100001001001110
11000100100001111001
10110011000101000100
10010001110011110111
11010100001110011000
11000110001110100101
10000000101011000000
11001001001111000011
10000011011101111000
10100011101001000011
10001101011000110000
10001011011000011001
10110000001011011000
11000101011111111101
10101011110010101010
11111111111111111111
U S Treasury 2,500,000.000 2,408,200.00 2,427,050.79- 18,850.795,498.63 0.91 Nt 0.875% 9/30/2696.32809,850.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CCZ2 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,000,000.000 964,340.00 938,887.4725,452.531,895.38 1.17 Nt 1.125% 10/31/2696.43403,990.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
91282CDG3 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,400,000.000 2,217,192.00 2,113,500.00 103,692.0090.41 1.49 Nt 1.375% 12/31/2892.383017,352.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CDP3 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 3,000,000.000 2,858,430.00 2,739,960.94 118,469.0617,909.84 2.49 Nt 2.375% 3/31/2995.281021,540.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CEE7 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,000,000.000 969,490.00 956,757.8112,732.194,843.75 2.97 Nt 2.875% 4/30/2996.94906,910.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CEM9 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,000,000.000 982,270.00 957,773.4424,496.564,633.15 2.80 Nt 2.750% 4/30/2798.22703,710.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CEN7 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,000,000.000 981,720.00 979,570.312,149.6988.32 3.31 Nt 3.250% 6/30/2998.17207,070.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CEV9 Asset Minor Code 21
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
189
U S Treasury 2,000,000.000 1,915,700.00 1,915,312.50387.5021,899.17 2.74 Nt 2.625% 7/31/2995.785014,680.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CFC0 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 3,000,000.000 3,013,830.00 2,958,398.4455,431.5629,221.31 3.86 Nt 3.875% 9/30/29 100.461021,690.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CFL0 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 4,000,000.000 4,036,400.00 4,080,632.82- 44,232.8241,589.04 4.09 Nt 4.125% 9/30/27 100.910014,360.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CFM8 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,615,000.000 1,630,390.95 1,599,543.9530,847.0010,883.70 3.96 Nt 4.000% 10/31/29 100.953011,660.30
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CFT3 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 4,925,000.000 4,899,981.00 4,846,025.4053,955.6071,902.28 3.52 Nt 3.500% 1/31/2899.492020,783.50
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CGH8 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,650,000.000 1,646,320.50 1,632,791.0213,529.485,240.78 3.76 Nt 3.750% 5/31/3099.777013,529.48
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CHF1 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,415,000.000 1,421,141.10 1,411,738.879,402.2323,257.60 4.36 Nt 4.375% 8/15/26 100.43401,499.90
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CHU8 Asset Minor Code 21
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
190
1010101010101010101010110011010000010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000000111
11010100001001001010
11000100100001010101
10110011000101011100
10010001110010000001
11010100001100101000
11000110001011001101
10000000101100000000
11001001000010111011
10000011110111101100
10100100110111001011
10001100111101111100
10001000000100101001
10100010100000011100
11001001111000010101
10101001110010101010
11111111111111111111
U S Treasury 2,000,000.000 2,055,400.00 2,031,093.7524,306.2523,251.37 4.50 Nt 4.625% 9/30/28 102.77009,380.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CJA0 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 3,225,000.000 3,340,906.50 3,291,515.6349,390.8726,487.94 4.71 Nt 4.875% 10/31/28 103.594015,738.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CJF9 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,170,000.000 2,191,027.30 2,193,432.03- 2,404.7312,818.04 4.58 Nt 4.625% 11/15/26 100.96902,972.90
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CJK8 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,000,000.000 1,007,460.00 993,125.0014,335.001,912.57 4.34 Nt 4.375% 12/15/26 100.74602,070.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CJP7 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 4,200,000.000 4,237,884.00 4,209,027.3428,856.6670,077.35 3.96 Nt 4.000% 1/31/29 100.902024,906.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CJW2 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,060,000.000 2,075,614.80 2,071,587.504,027.3025,694.02 4.22 Nt 4.250% 3/15/27 100.75804,985.20
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CKE0 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,635,000.000 2,642,298.95 2,628,824.2213,474.7318,312.53 4.11 Nt 4.125% 10/31/26 100.27704,216.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CLS8 Asset Minor Code 21
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
191
U S Treasury 4,100,000.000 4,201,721.00 4,103,527.3598,193.65491.44 4.27 Nt 4.375% 12/31/29 102.481029,971.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CMD0 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 3,200,000.000 3,263,136.00 3,243,125.0020,011.0056,729.28 4.17 Nt 4.250% 1/31/30 101.973023,648.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
91282CMG3 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,300,000.000 1,244,295.00 1,158,472.6685,822.344,888.25 1.18 Nt 1.125% 2/28/2795.71505,837.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
912828ZB9 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,500,000.000 2,425,000.00 2,381,434.4643,565.5421,132.60 2.32 Nt 2.250% 8/15/2797.000011,025.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
9128282R0 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 2,575,000.000 2,489,999.25 2,418,123.0471,876.217,399.63 2.33 Nt 2.250% 11/15/2796.699012,669.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
9128283F5 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 1,900,000.000 1,854,799.00 1,770,488.2884,310.7219,629.83 2.82 Nt 2.750% 2/15/2897.62109,424.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
9128283W8 Asset Minor Code 21
U S Treasury 3,850,000.000 3,778,120.50 3,675,246.09 102,874.4115,366.00 3.18 Nt 3.125% 11/15/2898.133023,023.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
9128285M8 Asset Minor Code 21
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
192
1010101010101010101010110011010111010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001000110
11000100100001001101
10110011000100000000
10010001110001100111
11010100001100100100
11000110011111110101
10000000100101100000
11001001110000110011
10000011111101101100
10100111110111100011
10001111111010110100
10000110011110000101
10110000001100100100
11000011111011100101
10101011001110011010
11111111111111111111
U S Treasury 2,900,000.000 2,792,729.00 2,649,761.72 142,967.2828,599.45 2.73 Nt 2.625% 2/15/2996.301019,604.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aa1
9128286B1 Asset Minor Code 21
Adobe Inc 1,150,000.000 1,187,754.50 1,148,240.5039,514.0025,932.50 4.79
4.950% 1/17/30 103.28309,487.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: A1
00724PAJ8 Asset Minor Code 28
Amazon Com.000.00.00.00.00 0.00
3.300% 4/13/2798.8960- 61,248.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA
Moodys Rating: A1
023135CF1 Asset Minor Code 28
American 1,000,000.000 967,230.00 996,890.00- 29,660.002,612.50 1.71 Express Co 1.650% 11/04/2696.72304,790.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A2
025816CM9 Asset Minor Code 28
American 1,285,000.000 1,291,630.60 1,283,845.517,785.092,781.31 4.84 Express 4.870% 5/15/28 100.51601,079.40
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
02582JJZ4 Asset Minor Code 31
American 1,200,000.000 1,157,436.00 1,182,444.00- 25,008.004,853.33 1.35 Honda Mtn 1.300% 9/09/2696.45306,072.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A3
02665WDZ1 Asset Minor Code 28
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET Total US Government Issues 106,725,626.900 105,332,127.43 102,592,732.68 2,739,394.75 676,959.78 3.18 558,694.09
ASSET DETAIL (continued)
Corporate Issues
193
Analog 500,000.000 463,535.00 423,880.0039,655.002,125.00 1.83 Devices Inc 1.700% 10/01/2892.70704,375.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A2
032654AU9 Asset Minor Code 28
Bank Of 1,630,000.000 1,636,976.40 1,624,651.5612,324.843,470.09 4.77 America 4.790% 5/15/28 100.42801,075.80 Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
05522RDG0 Asset Minor Code 31
Bank Of 1,260,000.000 1,278,660.60 1,259,929.3118,731.292,760.80 4.86 America 4.930% 5/15/29 101.48102,696.40 Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: Aaa
05522RDJ4 Asset Minor Code 31
Bmw US Cap 500,000.000 483,430.00 502,750.00- 19,320.002,413.19 1.29 LLC Extnd 1.250% 8/12/2696.68602,200.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
05565EBW4 Asset Minor Code 28
Bmw US Cap 700,000.000 712,873.00 692,594.0020,279.0013,747.22 4.96 LLC 5.050% 8/11/28 101.83904,368.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
05565ECE3 Asset Minor Code 28
Bmw US Cap 945,000.000 950,329.80 952,134.75- 1,804.9516,663.50 4.57 LLC 4.600% 8/13/27 100.56403,496.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
05565ECQ6 Asset Minor Code 28
BofA Auto 225,000.000 226,032.75 224,984.481,048.2779.75 1.15 Trust 20 1.160% 11/20/29 100.45901,077.75
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
05594BAD8 Asset Minor Code 31
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
194
1010101010101010101010110011010110010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000010111
11010100001001000010
11000100100001100001
10110011000100011000
10010001110000010001
11010100001110010100
11000110011010011101
10000000100010100000
11001001111101001011
10000011010111111000
10100000101001101011
10001110011111111000
10000101000010110101
10100010100111100000
11001111011100001101
10101001001110011010
11111111111111111111
Bank Amer.000.00.00.00.00 0.00
Corp Mtn 3.875% 8/01/2599.946027,056.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A1
06051GFS3 Asset Minor Code 28
Bank America 1,025,000.000 1,027,726.50 1,010,701.2517,025.2523,286.86 5.07 Mtn 5.080% 1/20/27 100.2660574.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A1
06051GLE7 Asset Minor Code 28
Bank Of 1,375,000.000 1,388,337.50 1,374,975.1113,362.393,507.78 5.68 America 5.740% 6/15/28 100.970082.50
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
06054YAC1 Asset Minor Code 31
Bank New York 1,525,000.000 1,546,548.25 1,527,836.5018,711.7513,822.47 4.66 Mtn 4.729% 4/20/29 101.41308,418.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA-
Moodys Rating: Aa2
06405LAH4 Asset Minor Code 28
Blackrock 95,000.00097,010.2094,828.052,182.151,327.10 4.60 Funding 4.700% 3/14/29 102.1160505.40
Standard & Poors Rating: AA-
Moodys Rating: Aa3
09290DAA9 Asset Minor Code 28
Bmw Vehicle 745,000.000 751,377.20 744,926.626,450.58602.21 4.81
4.850% 9/25/29 100.85602,279.70
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: Aaa
096924AD7 Asset Minor Code 31
Capital One 1,285,000.000 1,286,246.45 1,267,632.4218,614.032,524.31 4.42 Multi 4.420% 5/15/28 100.09701,220.75
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
14041NGD7 Asset Minor Code 31
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
195
Caterpillar 1,000,000.000 966,060.00 983,820.00- 17,760.003,418.06 1.19 Finl Mtn 1.150% 9/14/2696.60604,760.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
14913R2Q9 Asset Minor Code 28
Caterpillar 110,000.000 110,834.90 109,701.901,133.001,002.60 4.34 Mtn 4.375% 8/16/29 100.7590822.80
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
14913UAQ3 Asset Minor Code 28
Cisco Sys Inc 1,000,000.000 1,024,780.00 999,650.0025,130.0016,840.28 4.73
4.850% 2/26/29 102.47804,910.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA-
Moodys Rating: A1
17275RBR2 Asset Minor Code 28
Citibank N A 1,400,000.000 1,463,798.00 1,392,580.0071,218.0020,761.84 5.55 Sr 5.803% 9/29/28 104.55706,818.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: Aa3
17325FBB3 Asset Minor Code 28
Citibank N A.000.00.00.00.00 0.00
5.438% 4/30/26 100.7760- 2,012.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: Aa3
17325FBF4 Asset Minor Code 28
Citibank N A 1,140,000.000 1,161,888.00 1,146,954.0014,934.004,979.52 4.82
4.914% 5/29/30 101.920010,338.60
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: Aa3
17325FBP2 Asset Minor Code 28
Comcast 1,100,000.000 1,083,390.00 1,113,156.00- 29,766.009,075.00 3.35 Corporation 3.300% 4/01/2798.49003,212.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A3
20030NDK4 Asset Minor Code 28
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
196
1010101010101010101010110011010101010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000011111
11010100001001011010
11000100100000000001
10110011000100110000
10010001110000000001
11010100001001011110
11000110011101001101
10000000101111001000
11001001101001101011
10000010101011010000
10100011010001000111
10001000111000111100
10001101001111101111
10110000110110110110
11011000111000110101
10101001101110011010
11111111111111111111
Cummins Inc 80,000.00080,362.4079,944.00418.40491.11 4.23
4.250% 5/09/28 100.4530229.60
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
231021AY2 Asset Minor Code 28
Deere John 800,000.000 772,168.00 795,488.00- 23,320.006,422.22 1.76 Mtn 1.700% 1/11/2796.52103,720.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A1
24422EWA3 Asset Minor Code 28
John Deere 375,000.000 379,503.75 374,733.754,770.006,061.98 5.09 Mtn 5.150% 9/08/26 101.2010393.75
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A1
24422EXD6 Asset Minor Code 28
Discover Card 1,565,000.000 1,574,562.15 1,565,733.598,828.563,429.09 4.90 Exe 4.930% 6/15/28 100.61101,330.25
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: Aaa
254683CZ6 Asset Minor Code 31
Ford Credit 1,140,000.000 1,143,442.80 1,139,889.193,553.612,254.67 4.44 Auto 4.450% 10/15/29 100.30204,776.60
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: Aaa
34535KAD0 Asset Minor Code 31
Gm Financial 265,000.000 266,425.70 264,960.991,464.71514.54 4.64 Consume 4.660% 4/16/30 100.53801,091.80
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: Aaa
362549AD9 Asset Minor Code 31
Gm Fin Cons 10,160.57010,146.1410,159.69- 13.555.31 1.26 Auto 1.260% 11/16/2699.858044.09
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
380146AC4 Asset Minor Code 31
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
197
Goldman Sachs 1,400,000.000 1,390,690.00 1,353,009.0037,681.0023,206.94 3.88 Group 3.850% 1/26/2799.33502,996.00
Standard & Poors Rating: BBB+
Moodys Rating: A2
38141GWB6 Asset Minor Code 28
Hsbc USA Inc 1,140,000.000 1,148,994.60 1,139,959.209,035.404,123.00 4.61
4.650% 6/03/28 100.78905,791.20
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A2
40428HR95 Asset Minor Code 28
Hershey Co 1,230,000.000 1,254,403.20 1,228,813.2025,590.0020,611.04 4.66
4.750% 2/24/30 101.98408,917.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A1
427866BL1 Asset Minor Code 28
Home Depot 1,400,000.000 1,364,230.00 1,284,290.0079,940.0011,651.11 2.87 Inc 2.800% 9/14/2797.44505,222.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
437076BT8 Asset Minor Code 28
Hyundai Auto 54,156.52054,066.0854,154.43- 88.3553.43 2.22 Rec 2.220% 10/15/2699.8330142.37
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
448977AD0 Asset Minor Code 31
International 1,100,000.000 1,066,978.00 1,075,283.00- 8,305.009,545.56 2.27
2.200% 2/09/2796.99805,951.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A3
459200KM2 Asset Minor Code 28
Jpmorgan 310,000.000 313,974.20 310,000.003,974.206,817.08 4.92 Chase Co 4.979% 7/22/28 101.28201,534.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A1
46647PEL6 Asset Minor Code 28
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
198
1010101010101010101010110011010100010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000000111
11010100001001011110
11000100100000101101
10110011000100101000
10010001110001110111
11010100001011101110
11000110011000100101
10000000101000001000
11001001100100010011
10000010000001000100
10100100001111001111
10001001011101110000
10001110010011011111
10100010011101110010
11010100011111011101
10101011101110011010
11111111111111111111
Lehman Brth 1,000,000.000400.001.00399.00.00 0.03 Mtn Es 0.00001% 1/24/13.0400.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: N/A
525ESCIB7 Asset Minor Code 28
Mercedes Benz 1,000,000.000 1,013,210.00 1,006,679.696,530.312,124.44 4.72
4.780% 12/17/29 101.32103,960.00
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
58773DAD6 Asset Minor Code 31
National 1,000,000.000 1,015,930.00 1,015,470.00460.0014,133.33 4.72 Rural Mtn 4.800% 3/15/28 101.59303,780.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A2
63743HFG2 Asset Minor Code 28
Natixis Ny 1,000,000.000 1,017,670.00 1,000,000.0017,670.0044,568.33 5.51 C D 5.610% 9/18/26 101.76701,790.00
63873QP65 Asset Minor Code 28
Nissan Auto 385,000.000 388,029.95 384,921.853,108.101,014.69 5.88 Lease 5.930% 3/15/28 100.7870- 334.95
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
65480MAD5 Asset Minor Code 31
Northern Tr 1,000,000.000 998,780.00 1,009,660.00- 10,880.005,666.67 4.00 Corp Sr 4.000% 5/10/2799.87801,950.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: A2
665859AW4 Asset Minor Code 28
Pnc Financial 1,000,000.000 983,930.00 996,020.00- 12,090.0011,411.11 2.64
2.600% 7/23/2698.39302,890.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A3
693475AX3 Asset Minor Code 28
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
199
Pnc Financial 575,000.000 575,839.50 574,902.25937.2511,779.35 4.75
4.758% 1/26/27 100.1460511.75
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A3
693475BL8 Asset Minor Code 28
Pepsico Inc 1,500,000.000 1,527,705.00 1,492,275.0035,430.0027,600.00 4.52
4.600% 2/07/28 101.847011,970.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: A1
713448GB8 Asset Minor Code 28
Qualcomm Inc 850,000.000 859,001.50 853,570.005,431.504,250.00 4.45
4.500% 5/20/30 101.05905,431.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
747525BU6 Asset Minor Code 28
Roche 1,500,000.000 1,460,220.00 1,478,865.00- 18,645.0010,702.25 2.38 Holdings Inc 2.314% 3/10/2797.34806,345.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA
Moodys Rating: Aa2
771196BV3 Asset Minor Code 28
Charles 850,000.000 826,047.00 807,457.5018,589.506,825.97 2.52 Schwab Corp 2.450% 3/03/2797.18202,660.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A-
Moodys Rating: A2
808513BY0 Asset Minor Code 28
State Str 980,000.000 989,839.20 980,548.809,290.4021,240.30 5.22 Corp 5.272% 8/03/26 101.0040176.40
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: Aa3
857477CD3 Asset Minor Code 28
State Str 285,000.000 290,286.75 285,000.005,286.752,564.03 4.75 Corp 4.834% 4/24/30 101.85502,841.45
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: Aa3
857477DB6 Asset Minor Code 28
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
200
1010101010101010101010110011010011010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000000111
11010100001001001010
11000100100001000001
10110011000100100000
10010001110011111001
11010100001110010000
11000110011011100101
10000000110001011000
11001001000000101011
10000011010110000000
10100100111010111111
10001100111110100000
10010101110111001011
10110101111000001010
11010001011101000101
10101010001110011010
11111111111111111111
Target Corp 1,215,000.000 1,176,849.00 1,216,964.50- 40,115.5010,924.88 2.01
1.950% 1/15/2796.86002,976.75
Standard & Poors Rating: A
Moodys Rating: A2
87612EBM7 Asset Minor Code 28
Texas 1,100,000.000 1,073,424.00 1,032,438.0040,986.005,139.44 2.97 Instruments 2.900% 11/03/2797.58405,016.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: Aa3
882508BC7 Asset Minor Code 28
Toyota Auto 575,000.000 578,536.25 574,967.053,569.201,219.00 4.74
4.770% 11/15/29 100.61501,960.75
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
89231HAD8 Asset Minor Code 31
Toyota Mtr Cr.000.00.00.00.00 0.00
Mtn 1.125% 6/18/2697.054019,699.20
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: A1
89236TJK2 Asset Minor Code 28
Toyota Mtr 760,000.000 772,122.00 759,133.6012,988.404,661.33 4.72 Corp Mtn 4.800% 5/15/30 101.59507,562.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: A1
89236TNJ0 Asset Minor Code 28
Toyota Auto 615,000.000 620,836.35 614,999.635,836.721,489.67 5.40 Rec Own 5.450% 3/15/29 100.94901,223.85
Standard & Poors Rating: AAA
Moodys Rating: N/A
89237QAD2 Asset Minor Code 31
Unitedhealth 1,230,000.000 1,218,794.70 1,250,325.80- 31,531.105,815.17 3.73 Group 3.700% 5/15/2799.08907,084.80
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: A2
91324PEG3 Asset Minor Code 28
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET ASSET DETAIL (continued)
201
Volkswagen 199,865.790 200,357.46 199,854.14503.32349.32 5.71 Auto Loan 5.720% 3/22/27 100.2460- 165.53
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
92867YAB0 Asset Minor Code 31
Volkswagen 940,000.000 946,984.20 939,968.047,016.161,292.50 4.47 Auto Ln 4.500% 8/20/29 100.74303,092.60
Standard & Poors Rating: N/A
Moodys Rating: Aaa
92868MAD1 Asset Minor Code 31
Walmart Inc 425,000.000 429,866.25 424,264.755,601.503,235.31 4.30
4.350% 4/28/30 101.14503,310.75
Standard & Poors Rating: AA
Moodys Rating: Aa2
931142FN8 Asset Minor Code 28
Wells Fargo 2,200,000.000 2,228,050.00 2,198,020.0030,030.0047,960.00 5.38 M T N 5.450% 8/07/26 101.27503,696.00
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: Aa2
94988J6D4 Asset Minor Code 28
Cooperatieve 1,150,000.000 1,172,482.50 1,149,241.0023,241.5026,373.33 4.71 Mtn 4.800% 1/09/29 101.95508,544.50
Standard & Poors Rating: A+
Moodys Rating: Aa2
21688ABC5 Asset Minor Code 35
National 1,400,000.000 1,429,638.00 1,427,650.001,988.0032,493.07 4.84 Australia 4.944% 1/12/28 102.11703,164.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA-
Moodys Rating: Aa2
63253QAB0 Asset Minor Code 35
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET Total Corporate Issues 55,249,182.880 54,276,541.78 53,831,830.60 444,711.18 519,741.39 4.11 190,025.08
ASSET DETAIL (continued)
Foreign Issues
202
1010101010101010101010110011010010010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000011111
11010100001001001110
11000100100001101101
10110011000100111000
10010001110010001111
11010100001100100000
11000110011110001101
10000000110110011000
11001001001101010011
10000011111100010100
10100011100100110111
10001101011011101100
10010110101011111011
10100111010011001110
11011101111010101101
10101000001110011010
11111111111111111111
Timeoftradeexecutionandtradingparty(ifnotdisclosed)willbeprovideduponrequest.
Publiclytradedassetsarevaluedinaccordancewithmarketquotationsorvaluationmethodologiesfromfinancialindustryservicesbelievedbyustobereliable.Assetsthatarenot publiclytradedmaybereflectedatvaluesfromotherexternalsources.Assetsforwhichacurrentvalueisnotavailablemaybereflectedatapreviousvalueorasnotvalued,atparvalue, oratanominalvalue.Valuesshowndonotnecessarilyreflectpricesatwhichassetscouldbeboughtorsold.Valuesareupdatedbasedoninternalpolicyandmaybeupdatedless frequentlythanstatementgeneration.
Forfurtherinformation,pleasecontactyouraccountmanagerorrelationshipmanager.
Weprovideacashmanagementadministrativeserviceforthetemporaryinvestmentofprincipalandincomebalancesinyouraccount.Thefeeforprovidingthisservicewillnotexceed $0.42permonthforeach$1,000oftheaveragedailybalanceinvestedunderthecashmanagementadministrativeservice.Thechargeforthisservicehasbeendeductedfromyour account.
National Mtn 1,400,000.000 1,397,270.00 1,387,862.009,408.003,340.94 3.91
3.905% 6/09/2799.80505,376.00
Standard & Poors Rating: AA-
Moodys Rating: Aa2
63254ABE7 Asset Minor Code 35
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ENDINGYIELD ON
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODACCRUALMARKET Total Foreign Issues 3,950,000.000 3,999,390.50 3,964,753.0034,637.5062,207.34 4.47 17,084.50
Total Assets 166,304,696.570 163,987,946.50 160,769,203.07 3,218,743.43 1,259,723.88 3.52 765,803.67
Accrued Income.000 1,259,723.88 1,259,723.88 Grand Total 166,304,696.570 165,247,670.38 162,028,926.95 ASSET DETAIL (continued)
ASSET DETAIL MESSAGES
203
YieldonMarketandAccruedIncomeareestimatesprovidedforinformationalpurposesonlyandshouldnotbereliedonformakinginvestment,trading,ortaxdecisions.Theestimates maynotrepresenttheactualvalueearnedbyyourinvestmentsandtheyprovidenoguaranteeofwhatyourinvestmentsmayearninthefuture.
Theassetcategoriesusedinthisstatementmaybegeneralinnature.Forexample,assetslistedunderthe"MutualFunds"categorymayincludeopen-endinvestmentcompanies registeredundertheInvestmentCompanyActof1940(whicharecommonlyknownas"mutualfunds")butmayalsoincludeclosed-endinvestmentcompanies,unitinvestmenttrusts, commontrustfunds,collectivetrustfundsorotherinvestmentsthatareregisteredwith(ornotsubjecttoregistrationwith)theSecuritiesandExchangeCommission.
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 ASSET DETAIL MESSAGES (continued)
204
1010101010101010101010110011010001010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000010111
11010100001001010110
11000100100000001101
10110011000100010000
10010001110010011111
11010100001011101010
11000110011001011101
10000000111011110000
11001001011001110011
10000010000000111100
10100000011100011011
10001011111100101000
10011110100110100001
10110101000010011000
11001010011110010101
10101000101110011010
11111111111111111111
379,886.790First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y 0.041,759.05815.371,759.05815.37 31846V20307/01/25
3,900,000.000F H L B Deb 1.100% 8/20/2612,035.833,575.00.0015,610.83 3130ANMH0
996,506.590F N M A Gtd Remic 3.162% 6/25/272,543.982,710.962,629.152,625.79 3136AX7E9
1,084,176.470F N M A Gtd Remic 3.064% 9/25/272,685.252,856.472,773.462,768.26 3136AY6X6
1,408,825.330F N M A Gtd Remic 4.190% 7/25/284,908.884,929.724,919.454,919.15 3136BQDE6
770,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 3.413% 12/25/262,190.012,190.012,190.012,190.01 3137BUX60
885,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mt 3.194% 7/25/272,355.582,355.582,355.582,355.58 3137FAWS3
1,000,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mt 3.600% 1/25/283,000.003,000.003,000.003,000.00 3137F4D41
1,500,000.000F H L M C Mltcl 4.819% 6/25/286,023.756,023.756,023.756,023.75 3137HACX2
1,506,118.510F H L M C Mltcl Mt 4.777% 6/25/286,000.745,995.616,000.765,995.59 3137HAD45
1,500,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.650% 8/25/285,812.505,812.505,812.505,812.50 3137HAMH6
1,400,000.000F H L M C Mltcl 4.740% 8/25/285,530.005,530.005,530.005,530.00 3137HAQ74
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Cash And Equivalents
Total Cash And Equivalents1,759.05815.371,759.05815.37
US Government Issues
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL
205
1,380,000.000F H L M C Mltcl 4.850% 9/25/285,577.505,577.505,577.505,577.50 3137HAST4
1,095,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.572% 12/25/284,171.954,171.954,171.954,171.95 3137HBLV4
670,000.000F H L M C Mltcl 5.069% 10/25/282,830.192,830.192,830.192,830.19 3137HB3D4
1,055,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.860% 10/25/284,272.754,272.754,272.754,272.75 3137HB3G7
1,000,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 5.180% 3/25/294,316.674,316.674,316.674,316.67 3137HCKV3
1,370,000.000F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.543% 7/25/295,186.595,186.595,186.595,186.59 3137HDXL9
535,000.000FHLMC Remic Series 0.00001% 6/25/29.002,009.822,009.82.00 3137HFNZ4
535,000.000FHLMC Remic Series 0.00001% 1/25/30.001,966.131,966.13.00 3137HKXJ8
4,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 0.500% 10/31/271,739.131,630.44.003,369.57 91282CAU5
4,560,000.000U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 3/31/289,655.744,672.13.0014,327.87 91282CBS9
1,380,000.000U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 5/31/288,672.131,413.948,625.001,461.07 91282CCE9
.000U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/262,375.41154.922,530.33.00 91282CCF6
2,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 6/30/2810,497.242,070.6912,500.0067.93 91282CCH2
1,075,000.000U S Treasury Nt 0.625% 7/31/262,245.77556.80.002,802.57 91282CCP4
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
206
1010101010101010101010110011010000010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001010010
11000100100000100001
10110011000100001000
10010001110011101001
11010100001001011010
11000110011100110101
10000000111100110000
11001001010100001011
10000010101010101000
10100111000010010011
10001010011001100100
10011101111010010001
10100111101001011100
11000110111001111101
10101010101110011010
11111111111111111111
2,500,000.000U S Treasury Nt 0.875% 9/30/263,705.601,793.03.005,498.63 91282CCZ2
1,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 1.125% 10/31/26978.26917.12.001,895.38 91282CDG3
2,400,000.000U S Treasury Nt 1.375% 12/31/2813,742.222,848.1916,500.0090.41 91282CDP3
3,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.375% 3/31/2912,069.675,840.17.0017,909.84 91282CEE7
1,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.875% 4/30/292,500.002,343.75.004,843.75 91282CEM9
1,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.750% 4/30/272,391.302,241.85.004,633.15 91282CEN7
1,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 3.250% 6/30/2913,646.412,691.9116,250.0088.32 91282CEV9
2,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.625% 7/31/2917,548.344,350.83.0021,899.17 91282CFC0
3,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 3.875% 9/30/2919,692.629,528.69.0029,221.31 91282CFL0
4,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.125% 9/30/2728,027.4013,561.64.0041,589.04 91282CFM8
1,615,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.000% 10/31/295,617.395,266.31.0010,883.70 91282CFT3
4,925,000.000U S Treasury Nt 3.500% 1/31/2857,617.0614,285.22.0071,902.28 91282CGH8
1,650,000.000U S Treasury Nt 3.750% 5/31/30.003,043.03- 2,197.755,240.78 91282CHF1
1,415,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 8/15/2618,127.245,130.36.0023,257.60 91282CHU8
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
207
2,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.625% 9/30/2815,669.407,581.97.0023,251.37 91282CJA0
3,225,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.875% 10/31/2813,671.2012,816.74.0026,487.94 91282CJF9
2,170,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.625% 11/15/264,636.318,181.73.0012,818.04 91282CJK8
1,000,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 12/15/2620,192.313,595.2621,875.001,912.57 91282CJP7
4,200,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.000% 1/31/2956,154.7013,922.65.0070,077.35 91282CJW2
2,060,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.250% 3/15/2718,556.797,137.23.0025,694.02 91282CKE0
2,635,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.125% 10/31/269,451.638,860.90.0018,312.53 91282CLS8
4,100,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 12/31/2975,317.6814,861.2689,687.50491.44 91282CMD0
3,200,000.000U S Treasury Nt 4.250% 1/31/3045,458.5611,270.72.0056,729.28 91282CMG3
1,300,000.000U S Treasury Nt 1.125% 2/28/273,695.991,192.26.004,888.25 912828ZB9
2,500,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.250% 8/15/2716,470.994,661.61.0021,132.60 9128282R0
2,575,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.250% 11/15/272,676.464,723.17.007,399.63 9128283F5
1,900,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.750% 2/15/2815,299.724,330.11.0019,629.83 9128283W8
3,850,000.000U S Treasury Nt 3.125% 11/15/285,557.919,808.09.0015,366.00 9128285M8
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
208
1010101010101010101010110011010111010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000011111
11010100001001011110
11000100100001010101
10110011000101000100
10010001110101001011
11010100001001001100
11000110010111110101
10000000101001111000
11001000110000000011
10000010101010100100
10100011110101101111
10001001101001011000
10000000000101011011
10101011101101111000
11010110111111001101
10101001001010110010
11111111111111111111
2,900,000.000U S Treasury Nt 2.625% 2/15/2922,290.756,308.70.0028,599.45 9128286B1
1,150,000.000Adobe Inc 4.950% 1/17/3021,188.754,743.75.0025,932.50 00724PAJ8
.000Amazon Com 3.300% 4/13/275,280.001,320.006,600.00.00 023135CF1
1,000,000.000American Express Co 1.650% 11/04/261,237.501,375.00.002,612.50 025816CM9
1,285,000.000American Express 4.870% 5/15/282,781.315,214.965,214.962,781.31 02582JJZ4
1,200,000.000American Honda Mtn 1.300% 9/09/263,553.331,300.00.004,853.33 02665WDZ1
500,000.000Analog Devices Inc 1.700% 10/01/281,416.67708.33.002,125.00 032654AU9
1,630,000.000Bank Of America 4.790% 5/15/283,470.096,506.426,506.423,470.09 05522RDG0
1,260,000.000Bank Of America 4.930% 5/15/292,760.805,176.505,176.502,760.80 05522RDJ4
500,000.000Bmw US Cap LLC Extnd 1.250% 8/12/261,892.36520.83.002,413.19 05565EBW4
700,000.000Bmw US Cap LLC 5.050% 8/11/2810,801.392,945.83.0013,747.22 05565ECE3
945,000.000Bmw US Cap LLC 4.600% 8/13/2713,041.003,622.50.0016,663.50 05565ECQ6
225,000.000BofA Auto Trust 20 1.160% 11/20/2979.75815.63815.6379.75 05594BAD8
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Total US Government Issues 635,391.50 278,904.62 237,336.34 676,959.78 Corporate Issues
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
209
.000Bank Amer Corp Mtn 3.875% 8/01/252,583.33258.342,841.67.00 06051GFS3
1,025,000.000Bank America Mtn 5.080% 1/20/2718,947.694,339.17.0023,286.86 06051GLE7
1,375,000.000Bank Of America 5.740% 6/15/283,507.786,577.086,577.083,507.78 06054YAC1
1,525,000.000Bank New York Mtn 4.729% 4/20/297,812.706,009.77.0013,822.47 06405LAH4
95,000.000Blackrock Funding 4.700% 3/14/29955.01372.09.001,327.10 09290DAA9
745,000.000Bmw Vehicle 4.850% 9/25/29602.212,831.002,831.00602.21 096924AD7
1,285,000.000Capital One Multi 4.420% 5/15/282,524.314,733.084,733.082,524.31 14041NGD7
1,000,000.000Caterpillar Finl Mtn 1.150% 9/14/262,459.72958.34.003,418.06 14913R2Q9
110,000.000Caterpillar Mtn 4.375% 8/16/29601.56401.04.001,002.60 14913UAQ3
1,000,000.000Cisco Sys Inc 4.850% 2/26/2912,798.614,041.67.0016,840.28 17275RBR2
1,400,000.000Citibank N A Sr 5.803% 9/29/2813,991.686,770.16.0020,761.84 17325FBB3
.000Citibank N A 5.438% 4/30/261,170.68453.171,623.85.00 17325FBF4
1,140,000.000Citibank N A 4.914% 5/29/30147.423,685.50- 1,146.604,979.52 17325FBP2
1,100,000.000Comcast Corporation 3.300% 4/01/276,050.003,025.00.009,075.00 20030NDK4
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
210
1010101010101010101010110011010110010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000000111
11010100001001011010
11000100100001111001
10110011000101011100
10010001110100111101
11010100001011111100
11000110010010011101
10000000101110111000
11001000111101111011
10000010000000110000
10100100101011100111
10001000001100010100
10000011011001101011
10111001000110111100
11011010011000100101
10101011001010110010
11111111111111111111
80,000.000Cummins Inc 4.250% 5/09/28207.78283.33.00491.11 231021AY2
800,000.000Deere John Mtn 1.700% 1/11/275,288.891,133.33.006,422.22 24422EWA3
375,000.000John Deere Mtn 5.150% 9/08/264,452.601,609.38.006,061.98 24422EXD6
1,565,000.000Discover Card Exe 4.930% 6/15/283,429.096,429.546,429.543,429.09 254683CZ6
1,140,000.000Ford Credit Auto 4.450% 10/15/292,254.674,227.504,227.502,254.67 34535KAD0
265,000.000Gm Financial Consume 4.660% 4/16/30583.15939.571,008.18514.54 362549AD9
10,160.570Gm Fin Cons Auto 1.260% 11/16/2611.6517.0023.345.31 380146AC4
1,400,000.000Goldman Sachs Group 3.850% 1/26/2718,715.284,491.66.0023,206.94 38141GWB6
1,140,000.000Hsbc USA Inc 4.650% 6/03/28.004,123.00.004,123.00 40428HR95
1,230,000.000Hershey Co 4.750% 2/24/3015,742.294,868.75.0020,611.04 427866BL1
1,400,000.000Home Depot Inc 2.800% 9/14/278,384.443,266.67.0011,651.11 437076BT8
54,156.520Hyundai Auto Rec 2.220% 10/15/2686.18128.84161.5953.43 448977AD0
1,100,000.000International 2.200% 2/09/277,528.892,016.67.009,545.56 459200KM2
310,000.000Jpmorgan Chase Co 4.979% 7/22/285,530.841,286.24.006,817.08 46647PEL6
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
211
1,000,000.000Mercedes Benz 4.780% 12/17/292,124.443,983.333,983.332,124.44 58773DAD6
1,000,000.000National Rural Mtn 4.800% 3/15/2810,133.334,000.00.0014,133.33 63743HFG2
1,000,000.000Natixis Ny C D 5.610% 9/18/2639,893.334,675.00.0044,568.33 63873QP65
385,000.000Nissan Auto Lease 5.930% 3/15/281,014.691,902.541,902.541,014.69 65480MAD5
1,000,000.000Northern Tr Corp Sr 4.000% 5/10/272,333.333,333.34.005,666.67 665859AW4
1,000,000.000Pnc Financial 2.600% 7/23/269,244.442,166.67.0011,411.11 693475AX3
575,000.000Pnc Financial 4.758% 1/26/279,499.482,279.87.0011,779.35 693475BL8
1,500,000.000Pepsico Inc 4.600% 2/07/2821,850.005,750.00.0027,600.00 713448GB8
850,000.000Qualcomm Inc 4.500% 5/20/30.001,912.50- 2,337.504,250.00 747525BU6
1,500,000.000Roche Holdings Inc 2.314% 3/10/277,809.752,892.50.0010,702.25 771196BV3
850,000.000Charles Schwab Corp 2.450% 3/03/275,090.561,735.41.006,825.97 808513BY0
980,000.000State Str Corp 5.272% 8/03/2616,934.844,305.46.0021,240.30 857477CD3
285,000.000State Str Corp 4.834% 4/24/301,415.961,148.07.002,564.03 857477DB6
1,215,000.000Target Corp 1.950% 1/15/278,950.501,974.38.0010,924.88 87612EBM7
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
212
1010101010101010101010110011010101010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001000010
11000100100000011001
10110011000101110100
10010001110100101101
11010100001100110110
11000110010101001101
10000000100011010000
11001000101001011011
10000011111100011000
10100111010011001011
10001110101011010000
10001011010100110001
10101011010111101010
11001101111100011101
10101011101010110010
11111111111111111111
1,100,000.000Texas Instruments 2.900% 11/03/272,481.112,658.33.005,139.44 882508BC7
575,000.000Toyota Auto 4.770% 11/15/291,219.002,079.582,079.581,219.00 89231HAD8
.000Toyota Mtr Cr Mtn 1.125% 6/18/263,260.00240.003,500.00.00 89236TJK2
760,000.000Toyota Mtr Corp Mtn 4.800% 5/15/301,621.333,040.00.004,661.33 89236TNJ0
615,000.000Toyota Auto Rec Own 5.450% 3/15/291,489.672,501.002,501.001,489.67 89237QAD2
1,230,000.000Unitedhealth Group 3.700% 5/15/272,022.673,792.50.005,815.17 91324PEG3
199,865.790Volkswagen Auto Loan 5.720% 3/22/27423.811,081.371,155.86349.32 92867YAB0
940,000.000Volkswagen Auto Ln 4.500% 8/20/291,292.503,525.003,525.001,292.50 92868MAD1
425,000.000Walmart Inc 4.350% 4/28/301,694.691,540.62.003,235.31 931142FN8
2,200,000.000Wells Fargo M T N 5.450% 8/07/2637,968.339,991.67.0047,960.00 94988J6D4
1,150,000.000Cooperatieve Mtn 4.800% 1/09/2921,773.334,600.00.0026,373.33 21688ABC5
1,400,000.000National Australia 4.944% 1/12/2826,725.075,768.00.0032,493.07 63253QAB0
1,400,000.000National Mtn 3.905% 6/09/2726,120.114,555.8327,335.003,340.94 63254ABE7
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Total Corporate Issues 403,639.16 186,035.7869,933.55 519,741.39 Foreign Issues
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
213
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Total Foreign Issues74,618.5114,923.8327,335.0062,207.34 Grand Total 1,115,408.22 480,679.60 336,363.94 1,259,723.88 INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
214
1010101010101010101010110011010100010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000010111
11010100001001000110
11000100100000110101
10110011000101101100
10010001110101011011
11010100001110000110
11000110010000100101
10000000100100010000
11001000100100100011
10000011010110001100
10100000001101000011
10001111001110011100
10001000001000000001
10111001111100101110
11000001011011110101
10101001101010110010
11111111111111111111
06/13/2025Received Accrued Interest On Sale Of6,600.00
Amazon Com 3.300% 4/13/27
Income Credit 6,600.00 USD
06/16/2025American Express 4.870% 5/15/285,214.96
$0.00406/Pv On 1,285,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/13/2025Received Accrued Interest On Sale Of2,841.67
Bank Amer Corp Mtn 3.875% 8/01/25
Income Credit 2,841.67 USD
06/16/2025Bank Of America 4.790% 5/15/286,506.42
$0.00399/Pv On 1,630,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/16/2025Bank Of America 4.930% 5/15/295,176.50
$0.00411/Pv On 1,260,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/16/2025Bank Of America 5.740% 6/15/286,577.08
$0.00478/Pv On 1,375,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Interest
Amazon Com 3.300% 4/13/27
023135Cf1
American Express 4.870% 5/15/28
02582Jjz4
Bank Amer Corp Mtn 3.875% 8/01/25
06051Gfs3
Bank Of America 4.790% 5/15/28
05522Rdg0
Bank Of America 4.930% 5/15/29
05522Rdj4
Bank Of America 5.740% 6/15/28
06054Yac1
Bmw Vehicle 4.850% 9/25/29
096924Ad7
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
215
06/25/2025Bmw Vehicle 4.850% 9/25/292,831.00
$0.00380/Pv On 745,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/20/2025BofA Auto Trust 20 1.160% 11/20/29815.63
$0.00363/Pv On 225,000.00 Pv Due 6/20/25
06/16/2025Capital One Multi 4.420% 5/15/284,733.08
$0.00368/Pv On 1,285,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/13/2025Paid Accrued Interest On Purchase Of- 1,146.60 Citibank N A 4.914% 5/29/30
Income Debit 1,146.60- USD
06/13/2025Received Accrued Interest On Sale Of1,623.85
Citibank N A 5.438% 4/30/26
Income Credit 1,623.85 USD
06/16/2025Discover Card Exe 4.930% 6/15/286,429.54
$0.00411/Pv On 1,565,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl 4.740% 8/25/285,530.00
$0.00395/Pv On 1,400,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
BofA Auto Trust 20 1.160% 11/20/29
05594Bad8
Capital One Multi 4.420% 5/15/28
14041Ngd7
Citibank N A 4.914% 5/29/30
17325Fbp2
Citibank N A 5.438% 4/30/26
17325Fbf4
Discover Card Exe 4.930% 6/15/28
254683CZ6
F H L M C Mltcl 4.740% 8/25/28
3137Haq74
F H L M C Mltcl 4.819% 6/25/28
3137Hacx2
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
216
1010101010101010101010110011010011010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000010111
11010100001001010010
11000100100001011001
10110011000101100100
10010001110111010101
11010100001011111000
11000110010011100101
10000000111101000000
11001000000000011011
10000010000001001000
10100000111000110011
10001010101101001100
10010011101100010101
10101110011001010110
11000100011001101101
10101000001010110010
11111111111111111111
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl 4.819% 6/25/286,023.75
$0.00402/Pv On 1,500,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl 4.850% 9/25/285,577.50
$0.00404/Pv On 1,380,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl 5.069% 10/25/282,830.19
$0.00422/Pv On 670,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mt 3.194% 7/25/272,355.58
$0.00266/Pv On 885,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mt 3.600% 1/25/283,000.00
$0.00300/Pv On 1,000,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mt 4.777% 6/25/286,000.76
$0.00398/Pv On 1,507,412.51 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 3.413% 12/25/262,190.01
$0.00284/Pv On 770,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.543% 7/25/295,186.59
$0.00379/Pv On 1,370,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
F H L M C Mltcl 4.850% 9/25/28
3137Hast4
F H L M C Mltcl 5.069% 10/25/28
3137Hb3D4
F H L M C Mltcl Mt 3.194% 7/25/27
3137Faws3
F H L M C Mltcl Mt 3.600% 1/25/28
3137F4D41
F H L M C Mltcl Mt 4.777% 6/25/28
3137Had45
F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 3.413% 12/25/26
3137Bux60
F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.543% 7/25/29
3137Hdxl9
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
217
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.572% 12/25/284,171.95
$0.00381/Pv On 1,095,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.650% 8/25/285,812.50
$0.00388/Pv On 1,500,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.860% 10/25/284,272.75
$0.00405/Pv On 1,055,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 5.180% 3/25/294,316.67
$0.00432/Pv On 1,000,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F N M A Gtd Remic 3.064% 9/25/272,773.46
$0.00255/Pv On 1,086,046.22 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F N M A Gtd Remic 3.162% 6/25/272,629.15
$0.00264/Pv On 997,639.86 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025F N M A Gtd Remic 4.190% 7/25/284,919.45
$0.00349/Pv On 1,408,911.87 Pv Due 6/25/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.572% 12/25/28
3137Hblv4
F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.650% 8/25/28
3137Hamh6
F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 4.860% 10/25/28
3137Hb3G7
F H L M C Mltcl Mtg 5.180% 3/25/29
3137Hckv3
F N M A Gtd Remic 3.064% 9/25/27
3136Ay6X6
F N M A Gtd Remic 3.162% 6/25/27
3136Ax7E9
F N M A Gtd Remic 4.190% 7/25/28
3136Bqde6
FHLMC Remic Series 0.00001% 1/25/30
3137Hkxj8
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
218
1010101010101010101010110011010010010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001010110
11000100100001110101
10110011000101111100
10010001110110100011
11010100001001001000
11000110010110001101
10000000111010000000
11001000001101100011
10000010101011011100
10100111100110111011
10001011001000000000
10010000110000100101
10111100110010010010
11001000111110000101
10101010001010110010
11111111111111111111
06/25/2025FHLMC Remic Series 0.00001% 1/25/301,966.13
$0.00368/Pv On 535,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/25/2025FHLMC Remic Series 0.00001% 6/25/292,009.82
$0.00376/Pv On 535,000.00 Pv Due 6/25/25
06/02/2025Interest From 5/1/25 To 5/31/251,759.05
06/16/2025Ford Credit Auto 4.450% 10/15/294,227.50
$0.00371/Pv On 1,140,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/16/2025Gm Fin Cons Auto 1.260% 11/16/2623.34
$0.00105/Pv On 22,226.72 Pv Due 6/16/25
06/16/2025Gm Financial Consume 4.660% 4/16/301,008.18
$0.00380/Pv On 265,000.00 Pv Due 6/16/25
06/16/2025Hyundai Auto Rec 2.220% 10/15/26161.59
$0.00185/Pv On 87,347.97 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/16/2025Mercedes Benz 4.780% 12/17/293,983.33
$0.00398/Pv On 1,000,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
FHLMC Remic Series 0.00001% 6/25/29
3137Hfnz4
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
31846V203
Ford Credit Auto 4.450% 10/15/29
34535Kad0
Gm Fin Cons Auto 1.260% 11/16/26
380146Ac4
Gm Financial Consume 4.660% 4/16/30
362549Ad9
Hyundai Auto Rec 2.220% 10/15/26
448977Ad0
Mercedes Benz 4.780% 12/17/29
58773Dad6
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
219
06/10/2025National Mtn 3.905% 6/09/2727,335.00
0.019525 USD/$1 Pv On 1,400,000 Par Value Due 6/10/25
06/16/2025Nissan Auto Lease 5.930% 3/15/281,902.54
$0.00494/Pv On 385,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/13/2025Paid Accrued Interest On Purchase Of- 2,337.50 Qualcomm Inc 4.500% 5/20/30
Income Debit 2,337.50- USD
06/16/2025Toyota Auto 4.770% 11/15/292,079.58
$0.00362/Pv On 575,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/16/2025Toyota Auto Rec Own 5.450% 3/15/292,501.00
$0.00407/Pv On 615,000.00 Pv Due 6/15/25
06/13/2025Received Accrued Interest On Sale Of3,500.00
Toyota Mtr Cr Mtn 1.125% 6/18/26
Income Credit 3,500.00 USD
06/02/2025U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/262,362.50
0.00375 USD/$1 Pv On 630,000 Par Value Due 5/31/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
National Mtn 3.905% 6/09/27
63254Abe7
Nissan Auto Lease 5.930% 3/15/28
65480Mad5
Qualcomm Inc 4.500% 5/20/30
747525Bu6
Toyota Auto 4.770% 11/15/29
89231Had8
Toyota Auto Rec Own 5.450% 3/15/29
89237Qad2
Toyota Mtr Cr Mtn 1.125% 6/18/26
89236Tjk2
U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/26
91282Ccf6
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
220
1010101010101010101010110011010001010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000000111
11010100001001001110
11000100100000010101
10110011000101010100
10010001110110110011
11010100001110000010
11000110010001011101
10000000110111101000
11001000011001000011
10000011010111110100
10100100011110010111
10001101101111000100
10011000111101111111
10101110100011000100
11011111011010111101
10101010101010110010
11111111111111111111
06/13/2025Received Accrued Interest On Sale Of167.83
U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/26
Income Credit 167.83 USD
06/02/2025U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 5/31/288,625.00
0.00625 USD/$1 Pv On 1,380,000 Par Value Due 5/31/25
06/30/2025U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 6/30/2812,500.00
0.00625 USD/$1 Pv On 2,000,000 Par Value Due 6/30/25
06/30/2025U S Treasury Nt 1.375% 12/31/2816,500.00
0.006875 USD/$1 Pv On 2,400,000 Par Value Due 6/30/25
06/30/2025U S Treasury Nt 3.250% 6/30/2916,250.00
0.01625 USD/$1 Pv On 1,000,000 Par Value Due 6/30/25
06/13/2025Paid Accrued Interest On Purchase Of- 2,197.75 U S Treasury Nt 3.750% 5/31/30
Income Debit 2,197.75- USD
06/16/2025U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 12/15/2621,875.00
0.021875 USD/$1 Pv On 1,000,000 Par Value Due 6/15/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Total U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/262,530.33
U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 5/31/28
91282Cce9
U S Treasury Nt 1.250% 6/30/28
91282Cch2
U S Treasury Nt 1.375% 12/31/28
91282Cdp3
U S Treasury Nt 3.250% 6/30/29
91282Cev9
U S Treasury Nt 3.750% 5/31/30
91282CHF1
U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 12/15/26
91282Cjp7
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
221
06/30/2025U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 12/31/2989,687.50
0.021875 USD/$1 Pv On 4,100,000 Par Value Due 6/30/25
06/20/2025Volkswagen Auto Ln 4.500% 8/20/293,525.00
$0.00375/Pv On 940,000.00 Pv Due 6/20/25
06/20/2025Volkswagen Auto Loan 5.720% 3/22/271,155.86
$0.00477/Pv On 242,487.47 Pv Due 6/20/25
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
U S Treasury Nt 4.375% 12/31/29
91282Cmd0
Volkswagen Auto Ln 4.500% 8/20/29
92868Mad1
Volkswagen Auto Loan 5.720% 3/22/27
92867Yab0
Total Interest 336,363.94
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
222
1010101010101010101010110011010000010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000011111
11010100001001001010
11000100100000111001
10110011000101001100
10010001110111000101
11010100001100110010
11000110010100110101
10000000110000101000
11001000010100111011
10000011111101100000
10100011000000011111
10001100001010001000
10011011100001001111
10111100001000000000
11010011111101010101
10101000101010110010
11111111111111111111
06/26/2025Collected- 674.87
Charged For Period 05/01/2025 Thru 05/31/2025
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Trust Fees
Trust Fees
Total Trust Fees- 674.87
Total Trust Fees- 674.87
Total Plan Expenses- 674.87
PLAN EXPENSES
223
06/02/2025Purchased 10,987.500.00- 10,987.5010,987.50 10,987.5 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/2/25
31846V203
06/10/2025Purchased 27,335 27,335.000.00- 27,335.0027,335.00 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/10/25
31846V203
06/16/2025Purchased 107,718.520.00- 107,718.52 107,718.52 107,718.52 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/16/25
31846V203
06/16/2025Purchased 9,938.720.00- 9,938.729,938.72 9,938.72 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/16/25
31846V203
06/20/2025Purchased 48,118.170.00- 48,118.1748,118.17 48,118.17 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/20/25
31846V203
06/25/2025Purchased 16,242.620.00- 16,242.6216,242.62 16,242.62 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/25/25
31846V203
06/25/2025Purchased 62,538.200.00- 62,538.2062,538.20 62,538.2 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/25/25
31846V203
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Cash And Equivalents
PURCHASES
224
1010101010101010101010110011010111010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000000111
11010100001001000110
11000100100001101001
10110011000100001100
10010001110010101101
11010100001011100100
11000110001010011101
10000000111101111000
11001001010001010011
10000010000111101000
10100100100011001111
10001111011111101000
10001111100010100001
10100110001111010110
11001011111011111101
10101001100110001010
11111111111111111111
06/30/2025Purchased 134,937.500.00- 134,937.50 134,937.50 134,937.5 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/30/25
31846V203
06/12/2025Purchased 1,650,000.000.00- 1,632,791.02 1,632,791.02 1,650,000 Par Value Of
U S Treasury Nt 3.750% 5/31/30
Trade Date 6/12/25
Purchased Through Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxnzzaaayzaaa
1,650,000 Par Value At 98.95703152 %
91282CHF1
06/12/2025Purchased 600,000.000.00- 606,954.00 606,954.00 600,000 Par Value Of
Citibank N A 4.914% 5/29/30
Trade Date 6/12/25
Purchased Through BofA Securities, Inc.
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxn2Zaaayzaaa
600,000 Par Value At 101.159 %
17325FBP2
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Total First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y 417,816.230.00- 417,816.23 417,816.23 Total Cash And Equivalents 417,816.230.00- 417,816.23 417,816.23 US Government Issues
Total U S Treasury Nt 3.750% 5/31/30 1,650,000.000.00- 1,632,791.02 1,632,791.02 Total Government Issues 1,650,000.000.00- 1,632,791.02 1,632,791.02 Corporate Issues
Total Citibank N A 4.914% 5/29/30 600,000.000.00- 606,954.00 606,954.00 PURCHASES (continued)
225
06/12/2025Purchased 850,000.000.00- 853,570.00 853,570.00 850,000 Par Value Of
Qualcomm Inc 4.500% 5/20/30
Trade Date 6/12/25
Purchased Through BofA Securities, Inc.
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxn2caaayzaaa
850,000 Par Value At 100.42 %
747525BU6
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Total Qualcomm Inc 4.500% 5/20/30 850,000.000.00- 853,570.00 853,570.00 Total Corporate Issues 1,450,000.000.00- 1,460,524.00 1,460,524.00 Total Purchases 3,517,816.230.00- 3,511,131.25 3,511,131.25 PURCHASES (continued)
226
1010101010101010101010110011010110010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000011111
11010100001001000010
11000100100001000101
10110011000100010100
10010001110011011011
11010100001001010100
11000110001111110101
10000000111010111000
11001001011100101011
10000010101101111100
10100011111101000111
10001110111010100100
10001100111110010001
10110100100100010010
11000111011100010101
10101011100110001010
11111111111111111111
06/03/2025Sold- 1,138,200.150.00 1,138,200.15- 1,138,200.15.00 1,138,200.15 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/3/25
31846V203
06/13/2025Sold- 219,946.400.00 219,946.40- 219,946.40.00 219,946.4 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/13/25
31846V203
06/26/2025Sold 674.87- 674.870.00674.87- 674.87.00
Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y
Trade Date 6/26/25
31846V203
06/25/2025Paid Down- 1,294.000.001,294.00- 1,293.97.03
1,294 Par Value Of
F H L M C Mltcl Mt 4.777% 6/25/28
Trade Date 6/25/25
3137HAD45
06/25/2025Paid Down- 1,869.750.001,869.75- 1,741.13128.62 1,869.75 Par Value Of
F N M A Gtd Remic 3.064% 9/25/27
Trade Date 6/25/25
3136AY6X6
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/TRANSACTIONREALIZED
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONPROCEEDSBOOK VALUEGAIN/LOSS Cash And Equivalents
Total First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl Y- 1,358,821.420.00 1,358,821.42- 1,358,821.42.00 Total Cash And Equivalents- 1,358,821.420.00 1,358,821.42- 1,358,821.42.00 US Government Issues
Total F H L M C Mltcl Mt 4.777% 6/25/28- 1,294.000.001,294.00- 1,293.97.03
SALES AND MATURITIES
227
06/25/2025Paid Down- 1,133.270.001,133.27- 1,059.5673.71 1,133.27 Par Value Of
F N M A Gtd Remic 3.162% 6/25/27
Trade Date 6/25/25
3136AX7E9
06/25/2025Paid Down- 86.540.0086.54- 85.071.47
86.54 Par Value Of
F N M A Gtd Remic 4.190% 7/25/28
Trade Date 6/25/25
3136BQDE6
06/12/2025Sold- 630,000.000.00 610,091.02- 617,641.79- 7,550.77 630,000 Par Value Of
U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/26
Trade Date 6/12/25
Sold Through Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxnz2Aaayzaaa
630,000 Par Value At 96.83984444 %
91282CCF6
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/TRANSACTIONREALIZED
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONPROCEEDSBOOK VALUEGAIN/LOSS Total F N M A Gtd Remic 3.064% 9/25/27- 1,869.750.001,869.75- 1,741.13128.62 Total F N M A Gtd Remic 3.162% 6/25/27- 1,133.270.001,133.27- 1,059.5673.71 Total F N M A Gtd Remic 4.190% 7/25/28- 86.540.0086.54- 85.071.47 Total U S Treasury Nt 0.750% 5/31/26- 630,000.000.00 610,091.02- 617,641.79- 7,550.77 Total Government Issues- 634,383.560.00 614,474.58- 621,821.52- 7,346.94 Corporate Issues
SALES AND MATURITIES (continued)
228
1010101010101010101010110011010101010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000010111
11010100001001011010
11000100100000100101
10110011000100111100
10010001110011001011
11010100001110011110
11000110001000100101
10000000110111010000
11001001001000001011
10000011010001010100
10100000000101101011
10001000011101100000
10000100110011001011
10100110110101000100
11010000111000101101
10101011000110001010
11111111111111111111
06/12/2025Sold- 1,200,000.000.00 1,183,416.00- 1,122,468.0060,948.00 1,200,000 Par Value Of
Amazon Com 3.300% 4/13/27
Trade Date 6/12/25
Sold Through Barclays Capital Inc. Fixed In
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxn51Aaayzaaa
1,200,000 Par Value At 98.618 %
023135CF1
06/12/2025Sold- 200,000.000.00 199,764.00- 226,820.00- 27,056.00 200,000 Par Value Of
Bank Amer Corp Mtn 3.875% 8/01/25
Trade Date 6/12/25
Sold Through Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxn57Aaayzaaa
200,000 Par Value At 99.882 %
06051GFS3
06/12/2025Sold- 250,000.000.00 251,852.50- 250,000.001,852.50 250,000 Par Value Of
Citibank N A 5.438% 4/30/26
Trade Date 6/12/25
Sold Through Bank Of New York
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxn54Aaayzaaa
250,000 Par Value At 100.741 %
17325FBF4
06/16/2025Paid Down- 12,066.150.0012,066.15- 12,065.101.05 12,066.15 Par Value Of
Gm Fin Cons Auto 1.260% 11/16/26
Trade Date 6/16/25
380146AC4
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/TRANSACTIONREALIZED
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONPROCEEDSBOOK VALUEGAIN/LOSS Total Amazon Com 3.300% 4/13/27- 1,200,000.000.00 1,183,416.00- 1,122,468.0060,948.00 Total Bank Amer Corp Mtn 3.875% 8/01/25- 200,000.000.00 199,764.00- 226,820.00- 27,056.00 Total Citibank N A 5.438% 4/30/26- 250,000.000.00 251,852.50- 250,000.001,852.50 Total Gm Fin Cons Auto 1.260% 11/16/26- 12,066.150.0012,066.15- 12,065.101.05 SALES AND MATURITIES (continued)
229
06/16/2025Paid Down- 33,191.450.0033,191.45- 33,190.171.28 33,191.45 Par Value Of
Hyundai Auto Rec 2.220% 10/15/26
Trade Date 6/15/25
448977AD0
06/12/2025Sold- 640,000.000.00 619,193.60- 638,579.20- 19,385.60 640,000 Par Value Of
Toyota Mtr Cr Mtn 1.125% 6/18/26
Trade Date 6/12/25
Sold Through BofA Securities, Inc.
Swift External Ref#: Djcaxn5+aaayzaaa
640,000 Par Value At 96.749 %
89236TJK2
06/20/2025Paid Down- 42,621.680.0042,621.68- 42,619.202.48 42,621.68 Par Value Of
Volkswagen Auto Loan 5.720% 3/22/27
Trade Date 6/20/25
92867YAB0
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/TRANSACTIONREALIZED
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONPROCEEDSBOOK VALUEGAIN/LOSS Total Hyundai Auto Rec 2.220% 10/15/26- 33,191.450.0033,191.45- 33,190.171.28 Total Toyota Mtr Cr Mtn 1.125% 6/18/26- 640,000.000.00 619,193.60- 638,579.20- 19,385.60 Total Volkswagen Auto Loan 5.720% 3/22/27- 42,621.680.0042,621.68- 42,619.202.48 Total Corporate Issues- 2,377,879.280.00 2,342,105.38- 2,325,741.6716,363.71 Total Sales And Maturities- 4,371,084.260.00 4,315,401.38- 4,306,384.619,016.77 SALES AND MATURITIES (continued)
230
1010101010101010101010110011010100010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001011110
11000100100000001001
10110011000100100100
10010001110010111101
11010100001100101110
11000110001101001101
10000000110000010000
11001001000101110011
10000011111011000000
10100111011011100011
10001001111000101100
10000111101111111011
10110100011110000000
11011100011111000101
10101001000110001010
11111111111111111111
Realizedgain/lossshouldnotbeusedfortaxpurposes.
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SALES AND MATURITIES MESSAGES
231
< 20251,000,000.00400.00 0.00
2025.00.00 0.00
2026 25,784,317.09 25,443,454.87 15.56 2027 37,240,548.85 36,456,313.09 22.28 2028 54,309,943.84 53,960,976.80 32.98 2029 36,100,000.00 36,075,874.15 22.05 2030 11,490,000.00 11,671,040.80 7.13 Aaa9,984,865.79 10,046,711.56 6.14
Aa1 86,035,000.00 84,526,611.00 51.66 Aa29,600,000.00 9,664,075.00 5.91
Aa35,000,000.00 5,076,246.15 3.10
A18,150,000.00 8,260,137.15 5.05
A2 14,920,000.00 14,733,971.90 9.01
A34,975,000.00 4,867,573.50 2.98
N/A 26,259,943.99 25,415,063.45 15.53 Not Provided1,000,000.00 1,017,670.00 0.62
AAA 10,429,317.09 10,492,906.72 6.41 AA+3,900,000.00 3,773,874.00 2.31
AA1,925,000.00 1,890,086.25 1.16
AA-5,420,000.00 5,495,246.45 3.36
A+ 12,630,000.00 12,804,798.70 7.83
A 10,780,000.00 10,704,145.70 6.54
A- 10,490,000.00 10,317,036.60 6.31
BBB+1,400,000.00 1,390,690.00 0.85
N/A 107,950,492.69 105,721,605.29 64.62 Not Provided1,000,000.00 1,017,670.00 0.61
02687304
55- -01-B -62 -185-04
0101 -11-03184-04
CITY OF LINCOLN
ACCOUNT Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
PERCENTAGE
OF
PAR VALUEMARKET VALUECATEGORY
MATURITY SUMMARY
Total 165,924,809.78 163,608,059.71 100.00
MOODY'S RATING
Total 165,924,809.78 163,608,059.71 100.00
S&P RATING
Total 165,924,809.78 163,608,059.71 100.00
BOND SUMMARY
232
10101010101010101010
10110011010011010011
10100010000010000000
10011101001000001111
11010100001001001010
11000100100001100101
10110011000100101100
10010001110000110011
11010100001001010000
11000110001110001101
10000000101001000000
11001001100001001011
10000010101100000100
10100111101110010011
10001100011011111100
10011100001011101111
10100011111011111000
11011001011101011101
10101000100110001010
11111111111111111111
233
CITY OF LINCOLN
ATTENTION: CITY MANAGER
600 6TH STREET
LINCOLN, CA 95648-1825
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN POST EMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS TRUST- OPEB
This statement is for the period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 Questions?
If you have any questions regarding your account or this statement, please contact your Account Manager.
Account Manager:
RODION BUTYRSKI
18300 VON KARMAN
SUITE 500
IRVINE CA 92612
Phone: 949-224-7211
E-mail: [email protected]
ADFFDFDFFADTTAFFTTADAAFDTAAFFAFTAFAADTDFTDADFTTFDFFFTFDAFDFDADTFT 000000404 18 SP 000638998208180 P
234
1010101010101010101010110011011000101011
10101010000010010010
10011011111000010101
10101110110001010110
10000110011100001101
10010011000010000100
10010001100101101001
11000000001010111010
11011010010111101101
10000000100010111000
11101000101101010011
10000010001011110100
10100101110011110011
10001010000100000100
10010001011001000101
10110000111110101110
11010000110011001101
10101010101010011010
11111111111111111111
Market And Cost Reconciliation 3
Cash Reconciliation 4
Asset Summary 5
Asset Detail 6
Income Accrual Detail 10
Investment Activity 12
Plan Expenses 14
Purchases 15
Sales And Maturities 18
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
......................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
SchedulePage
TABLE OF CONTENTS
235
*IncludesProfessionalFees,ContractAdministratorFeesandInvestmentAdvisoryFees Interest1,283.091,283.09
Dividends56,603.2956,603.29
Change In Unrealized Gain/Loss 514,924.01.00
Net Accrued Income (Current-Prior)- 69.30- 69.30
Administrative Expenses*- 3,121.66- 3,121.66
Trust Fees- 3,425.22- 3,425.22
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
06/30/202506/30/2025
MARKET BOOK VALUE
Beginning Market And Cost 18,021,958.32 18,153,555.62 Investment Activity
Total Investment Activity 572,741.0957,817.08 Plan Expenses
Total Plan Expenses- 6,546.88- 6,546.88
Net Change In Market And Cost 566,194.2151,270.20 Ending Market And Cost 18,588,152.53 18,204,825.82
MARKET AND COST RECONCILIATION
MARKET AND COST RECONCILIATION MESSAGES
236
1010101010101010101010110011011000000011
10101010000010010010
10011011110100010101
10101110110001001010
10000110011100000001
10010011000010110000
10010000100001111001
11000000001101111000
11011010011000010101
10000000101111001000
11101001001100001011
10000011000010111100
10100100100111110011
10001110111100001100
10010001000111101011
10110001100011001000
11001000110000000101
10101011001010011010
11111111111111111111
*IncludesProfessionalFees,ContractAdministratorFeesandInvestmentAdvisoryFees Interest1,283.09
Dividends56,603.29
Cash Equivalent Purchases- 19,756.65
Mutual Fund Purchases- 38,129.73
Cash Equivalent Sales6,546.88
Administrative Expenses*- 3,121.66
Trust Fees- 3,425.22
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
Beginning Cash.00
Investment Activity
Total Investment Activity6,546.88
Plan Expenses
Total Plan Expenses- 6,546.88
Net Change In Cash.00
Ending Cash.00
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
CASH RECONCILIATION
CASH RECONCILIATION MESSAGES
237
EstimatedAnnualIncomeisanestimateprovidedforinformationalpurposesonly andshouldnotbereliedonformakinginvestment,trading,ortaxdecisions.The estimatesmaynotrepresenttheactualvalueearnedbyyourinvestmentsand theyprovidenoguaranteeofwhatyourinvestmentsmayearninthefuture.
Cash And Equivalents 358,010.66 358,010.66 1.92 Mutual Funds-Equity 10,912,700.53 10,414,687.74 58.71 Mutual Funds-Fixed Income 7,316,227.55 7,430,913.63 39.36 Accrued Income1,213.791,213.79 0.01
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
06/30/202506/30/2025% OF
ASSETSMARKETBOOK VALUEMARKET
Total Assets 18,586,938.74 18,203,612.03 99.99 Grand Total 18,588,152.53 18,204,825.82 100.00 Estimated Annual Income 492,453.58
ASSET SUMMARY
ASSET SUMMARY MESSAGES
CASH EQUIV & ACCR
MUTUAL FUNDS
238
1010101010101010101010110011011000000011
10101010000010010010
10011011110000001101
10101110110001010010
10000110011101011001
10010010000010000100
10010111100000100111
11000000001010100010
11011010001001110101
10000000101111111000
11101000000110111011
10000011000010011100
10100011010101101011
10001110000100100100
10010110011101011111
10101100101111001000
11000011010101110101
10101010101010000010
11111111111111111111
First Am Govt 358,010.660 358,010.66 358,010.66.00 358,010.661,213.79 Ob Fd Cl X1.0000.00.00 4.26
31846V336 Asset Minor Code 1
Cohen & 10,593.146 521,924.30 553,903.32- 31,979.02 553,903.32.00 Steers Instl Realty Shares49.2700- 1,049.42- 31,979.02 3.04 19247U106 Asset Minor Code 98
Columbia 2,726.46382,557.3076,855.735,701.5776,855.73.00 Small Cap Growth Inst330.28006,679.835,701.57 0.00
19765Y340 Asset Minor Code 98
Columbia 35,953.551 1,394,997.78 1,394,238.89758.89 1,394,238.89.00 Contrarian Core Fund38.800074,423.85758.89 0.65
19766M709 Asset Minor Code 98
Fidelity 22,096.919 1,266,816.37 1,145,808.91 121,007.46 1,145,808.91.00 International Index Fund57.330030,935.69 121,007.46 2.71 315911727 Asset Minor Code 98
Emerald 3,065.75683,265.9381,492.621,773.3181,492.62.00 Growth Institutional27.16007,909.651,773.31 2.49
317609253 Asset Minor Code 98
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)ADJ PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ADJ PRIOR MARKETENDING ACCRUAL
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODUNREALIZED GAIN/LOSSYIELD ON MARKET Money Markets
Total Money Markets 358,010.660 358,010.66 358,010.66.00 358,010.661,213.79 .00.00 4.25
Total Cash And 358,010.660 358,010.66 358,010.66.00 358,010.661,213.79 Equivalents.00.00 4.25
Mutual Funds-Equity
ASSET DETAIL
Cash And Equivalents
Mutual Funds
239
Goldman Sachs 20,775.267 470,559.80 471,526.82- 967.02 452,900.82.00 Gqg Ptnrs Intl Opps R622.65008,102.3617,658.98 2.00
38147N269 Asset Minor Code 98
Hartford 51,315.474 975,507.16 896,221.1779,285.99 896,221.17.00 Schroders Emerging Markets19.010057,473.3379,285.99 1.17 41665X859 Asset Minor Code 98
Lazard Cl 16,638.851 298,833.76 270,496.7828,336.98 270,496.78.00 List Infrastr Inst17.96001,677.9728,336.98 2.76
52106N459 Asset Minor Code 98
Mfs 9,779.532 467,363.83 451,397.7715,966.06 451,397.77.00 International Growth R647.790011,833.2315,966.06 1.47 552746356 Asset Minor Code 98
Nyli Cbre 19,354.916 276,194.65 268,705.067,489.59 273,317.47.00 Global Infrastructure14.2700- 383.632,877.18 2.14
56064L280 Asset Minor Code 98
Putnam Core 13,516.993 610,697.74 593,536.9017,160.84 593,536.90.00 Equity Fund Y45.180030,413.2317,160.84 0.70
74676P839 Asset Minor Code 98
Schwab U S 175,076.000 4,278,857.44 4,013,533.68 265,323.76 4,013,533.68.00 Large Cap Etf24.4400 199,586.64 265,323.76 1.17 808524201 Asset Minor Code 94
Undiscovered 2,254.591 185,124.47 196,970.09- 11,845.62 196,970.09.00 Mgrs Behavioral Value82.11005,140.47- 11,845.62 2.02
904504479 Asset Minor Code 98
Baird 202,008.366 1,989,782.41 2,025,796.03- 36,013.62 2,025,796.03.00 Aggregate Bond Fd Instl9.850024,186.79- 36,013.62 4.06 057071854 Asset Minor Code 99
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)ADJ PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ADJ PRIOR MARKETENDING ACCRUAL
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODUNREALIZED GAIN/LOSSYIELD ON MARKET Total Mutual Funds-Equity 383,147.459 10,912,700.53 10,414,687.74 498,012.79 10,400,674.15.00 432,743.20 512,026.38 1.47
Mutual Funds-Fixed Income
ASSET DETAIL (continued)
240
1010101010101010101010110011011000000011
10101010000010010010
10011011101100010101
10101110110001001010
10000110011101001001
10010010000011110100
10010110100011011011
11000000001100111100
11011010010100110101
10000000101010110000
11101000110110010011
10000011010111011100
10100010001000010011
10001010110101100000
10000111000100111011
10101110111111101110
11000100010110000101
10101001101010100010
11111111111111111111
Dodge Cox 92,342.984 1,167,215.32 1,194,241.94- 27,026.62 1,194,241.94.00 Income12.64008,280.81- 27,026.62 4.22
256210105 Asset Minor Code 99
Ishares Core 18,115.000 1,797,008.00 1,815,199.27- 18,191.27 1,815,199.27.00 U.S. Aggregate Bond Etf99.200019,926.50- 18,191.27 3.81 464287226 Asset Minor Code 95
Nyli MacKay 64,572.063 336,420.45 340,039.30- 3,618.85 340,039.30.00 High Yield Corp Bd Fd R65.21003,853.91- 3,618.85 6.24 56063N881 Asset Minor Code 99
Pgim Total 112,814.679 1,358,288.74 1,388,168.73- 29,879.99 1,388,168.73.00 Return Bond Cl R612.040016,854.51- 29,879.99 4.73
74440B884 Asset Minor Code 99
Voya 75,940.003 667,512.63 667,468.3644.27 667,468.36.00 Intermediate Bond Fund Class R68.79009,078.2944.27 4.77 92913L569 Asset Minor Code 99
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)ADJ PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ADJ PRIOR MARKETENDING ACCRUAL
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODUNREALIZED GAIN/LOSSYIELD ON MARKET Total Mutual Funds-Fixed 565,793.095 7,316,227.55 7,430,913.63- 114,686.08 7,430,913.63.00 Income82,180.81- 114,686.08 4.31
Total Mutual Funds 948,940.554 18,228,928.08 17,845,601.37 383,326.71 17,831,587.78.00 514,924.01 397,340.30 2.61
Total Assets 1,306,951.214 18,586,938.74 18,203,612.03 383,326.71 18,189,598.441,213.79 514,924.01 397,340.30 2.64
Accrued Income.0001,213.791,213.79
Grand Total 1,306,951.214 18,588,152.53 18,204,825.82 ASSET DETAIL (continued)
241
Timeoftradeexecutionandtradingparty(ifnotdisclosed)willbeprovideduponrequest.
Publiclytradedassetsarevaluedinaccordancewithmarketquotationsorvaluationmethodologiesfromfinancialindustryservicesbelievedbyustobereliable.Assetsthatarenot publiclytradedmaybereflectedatvaluesfromotherexternalsources.Assetsforwhichacurrentvalueisnotavailablemaybereflectedatapreviousvalueorasnotvalued,atparvalue, oratanominalvalue.Valuesshowndonotnecessarilyreflectpricesatwhichassetscouldbeboughtorsold.Valuesareupdatedbasedoninternalpolicyandmaybeupdatedless frequentlythanstatementgeneration.
Forfurtherinformation,pleasecontactyouraccountmanagerorrelationshipmanager.
YieldonMarketandAccruedIncomeareestimatesprovidedforinformationalpurposesonlyandshouldnotbereliedonformakinginvestment,trading,ortaxdecisions.Theestimates maynotrepresenttheactualvalueearnedbyyourinvestmentsandtheyprovidenoguaranteeofwhatyourinvestmentsmayearninthefuture.
Theassetcategoriesusedinthisstatementmaybegeneralinnature.Forexample,assetslistedunderthe"MutualFunds"categorymayincludeopen-endinvestmentcompanies registeredundertheInvestmentCompanyActof1940(whicharecommonlyknownas"mutualfunds")butmayalsoincludeclosed-endinvestmentcompanies,unitinvestmenttrusts, commontrustfunds,collectivetrustfundsorotherinvestmentsthatareregisteredwith(ornotsubjecttoregistrationwith)theSecuritiesandExchangeCommission.
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
ASSET DETAIL MESSAGES
242
1010101010101010101010110011011000000011
10101010000010010010
10011011101000011101
10101110110001011010
10000110011101111101
10010010000010010000
10010101100000100001
11000000001000010100
11011010010010110101
10000000111011100000
11101001011010010011
10000010011010000100
10100111101000111011
10001001100111000100
10000000100100101001
10110101110100100010
11010011110011010101
10101011001010001010
11111111111111111111
358,010.660First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X 0.041,283.091,213.791,283.091,213.79 31846V33607/01/25
10,593.146Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares 1.50.004,879.764,879.76.00 19247U10606/30/2506/30/25
16,638.851Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst 0.50.001,783.321,783.32.00 52106N45906/20/2506/23/25
19,354.916Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure 0.31.002,478.222,478.22.00 56064L28006/30/2506/30/25
175,076.000Schwab U S Large Cap Etf 0.29.0012,622.9812,622.98.00 80852420106/25/2506/30/25
202,008.366Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl 0.40.006,648.866,648.86.00 05707185406/24/2506/25/25
92,342.984Dodge Cox Income 0.53.0012,605.0612,605.06.00 25621010506/25/2506/26/25
18,115.000Ishares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond Etf 3.78.005,850.585,850.58.00 46428722606/02/2506/05/25
64,572.063Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6 0.33.001,772.801,772.80.00 56063N88106/30/2506/30/25
112,814.679Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6 0.57.005,433.465,433.46.00 74440B88412/22/2206/30/25
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Cash And Equivalents
Total Cash And Equivalents1,283.091,213.791,283.091,213.79 Mutual Funds-Equity
Total Mutual Funds-Equity.0021,764.2821,764.28.00
Mutual Funds-Fixed Income
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL
243
75,940.003Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6 0.42.002,528.252,528.25.00 92913L56906/30/2506/30/25
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Total Mutual Funds-Fixed Income.0034,839.0134,839.01.00 Grand Total1,283.0957,817.0857,886.381,213.79
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
244
1010101010101010101010110011011000000011
10101010000010010010
10011011100100000101
10101110110001010110
10000110011101100101
10010010000011011000
10010100100101101111
11000000001011100010
11011010001101000101
10000000101011011000
11101000111110010011
10000010010100011000
10100101011011010011
10001010011011011100
10001111101101111111
10111011101101010010
11011000110100010101
10101010101010111010
11111111111111111111
06/02/2025Interest From 5/1/25 To 5/31/251,283.09
06/24/20250.033025 USD/Share On 201,330.602 Shares Due 6/25/256,648.86 Dividend Payable 06/25/25
06/30/20250.465 USD/Share On 10,494.105 Shares Due 6/30/254,879.76 Dividend Payable 06/30/25
06/25/20250.138 USD/Share On 91,340.992 Shares Due 6/26/2512,605.06 Dividend Payable 06/26/25
06/05/20250.322969 USD/Share On 18,115 Shares Due 6/5/255,850.58 06/20/20250.10783 USD/Share On 16,538.212 Shares Due 6/23/251,783.32 Dividend Payable 06/23/25
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Interest
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
31846V336
Total Interest1,283.09
Dividends
Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl
057071854
Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares
19247U106
Dodge Cox Income
256210105
Ishares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond Etf
464287226
Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst
52106N459
Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure
56064L280
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
245
06/30/20250.1292 USD/Share On 19,181.25 Shares Due 6/30/252,478.22 Dividend Payable 06/30/25
06/30/20250.0276 USD/Share On 64,231.794 Shares Due 6/30/251,772.80 Dividend Payable 06/30/25
06/30/2025Dividend From 6/1/25 To 6/30/255,433.46
06/30/2025Schwab U S Large Cap Etf12,622.98
0.0721 USD/Share On 175,076 Shares Due 6/30/25
06/30/2025Dividend From 6/1/25 To 6/30/252,528.25
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6
56063N881
Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6
74440B884
Schwab U S Large Cap Etf
808524201
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6
92913L569
Total Dividends56,603.29
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
246
1010101010101010101010110011011000000011
10101010000010010010
10011011100000000101
10101110110001011110
10000110011100010101
10010010000011001100
10010011100111000111
11000000001001010100
11011010011110011101
10000000111001101000
11101000100010011011
10000011010000010100
10100111110011101011
10001011011000001100
10001011100100001111
10100010100011101010
11011010110001111101
10101000101010011010
11111111111111111111
06/26/2025Paid To Phase II Systems- 3,121.66
Pars Trust Admin Fee
Per Directive Dated 06/24/25
06/26/2025Collected- 3,425.22
Charged For Period 05/01/2025 Thru 05/31/2025
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Administrative Expenses
Contract Administrator Fees
Administrative Fee
Total Administrative Fee- 3,121.66
Total Contract Administrator Fees- 3,121.66
Total Administrative Expenses- 3,121.66
Trust Fees
Trust Fees
Total Trust Fees- 3,425.22
Total Trust Fees- 3,425.22
Total Plan Expenses- 6,546.88
PLAN EXPENSES
247
06/03/2025Purchased 1,283.090.00- 1,283.091,283.09 1,283.09 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/3/25
31846V336
06/05/2025Purchased 5,850.580.00- 5,850.585,850.58 5,850.58 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/5/25
31846V336
06/30/2025Purchased 12,622.980.00- 12,622.9812,622.98 12,622.98 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/30/25
31846V336
06/30/2025Purchased 99.04199.041.00- 4,879.764,879.76
Shares
Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares @ 49.27 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
19247U106
06/20/2025Purchased100.639.00- 1,783.321,783.32
100.639 Shares
Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst @ 17.72 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/23/25
52106N459
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Cash And Equivalents
Total First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X 19,756.650.00- 19,756.6519,756.65 Total Cash And Equivalents 19,756.650.00- 19,756.6519,756.65 Mutual Funds-Equity
Total Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares99.041.00- 4,879.764,879.76
PURCHASES
248
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010011110010010
10011011111100010101
10101110110001011010
10000110011100001001
10010010000010001100
10010010100001001001
11000000001000100110
11011010000101100101
10000000101111100000
11101000010101100011
10000010100010101100
10100010001100110111
10001110011000001000
10000111101000111111
10101101101010000010
11010111110010001101
10101000101010010010
11111111111111111111
06/30/2025Purchased173.666.00- 2,478.222,478.22
173.666 Shares
Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure @ 14.27 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
56064L280
06/24/2025Purchased677.764.00- 6,648.866,648.86
677.764 Shares
Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl @ 9.81 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/25/25
057071854
06/25/2025Purchased 1,001.992.00- 12,605.0612,605.06 1,001.992 Shares
Dodge Cox Income @ 12.58 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/26/25
256210105
06/30/2025Purchased340.269.00- 1,772.801,772.80
340.269 Shares
Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6 @ 5.21 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
56063N881
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Total Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst100.639.00- 1,783.321,783.32 Total Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure173.666.00- 2,478.222,478.22 Total Mutual Funds-Equity373.346.00- 9,141.309,141.30
Mutual Funds-Fixed Income
Total Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl677.764.00- 6,648.866,648.86 Total Dodge Cox Income 1,001.992.00- 12,605.0612,605.06 Total Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6340.269.00- 1,772.801,772.80 00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
PURCHASES (continued)
249
06/30/2025Purchased451.284.00- 5,433.465,433.46
451.284 Shares
Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6 @ 12.04 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
74440B884
06/30/2025Purchased287.628.00- 2,528.252,528.25
287.628 Shares
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6 @ 8.79 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
92913L569
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Total Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6451.284.00- 5,433.465,433.46 Total Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6287.628.00- 2,528.252,528.25 Total Mutual Funds-Fixed Income 2,758.937.00- 28,988.4328,988.43 Total Purchases 22,888.933.00- 57,886.3857,886.38 00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
PURCHASES (continued)
250
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010011110010010
10011011111000011101
10101110110001001010
10000110011100111101
10010010000011101000
10010001100010110011
11000000001100001110
11011010000011100101
10000000111110110000
11101001111001100011
10000011101111110100
10100111101100011111
10001101001010101100
10000000001000101101
10110110100001001110
11000000010111011101
10101010001010111010
11111111111111111111
Realizedgain/lossshouldnotbeusedfortaxpurposes.
06/26/2025Sold- 3,425.220.003,425.22- 3,425.22.00- 3,425.22 3,425.22 Units Of.00
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/26/25
31846V336
06/26/2025Sold- 3,121.660.003,121.66- 3,121.66.00- 3,121.66 3,121.66 Units Of.00
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/26/25
31846V336
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/TRANSACTIONREALIZEDPRIOR MARKET
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONPROCEEDSBOOK VALUEGAIN/LOSSREALIZED GAIN/LOSS Cash And Equivalents
Total First Am Govt Ob Fd- 6,546.880.006,546.88- 6,546.88.00- 6,546.88 Cl X.00
Total Cash And- 6,546.880.006,546.88- 6,546.88.00- 6,546.88 Equivalents.00
Total Sales And- 6,546.880.006,546.88- 6,546.88.00- 6,546.88 Maturities.00
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-OPEB
SALES AND MATURITIES
SALES AND MATURITIES MESSAGES
251
CITY OF LINCOLN
ATTENTION: CITY MANAGER
600 6TH STREET
LINCOLN, CA 95648-1825
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN POST EMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS TRUST- PENSION
This statement is for the period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025 Questions?
If you have any questions regarding your account or this statement, please contact your Account Manager.
Account Manager:
RODION BUTYRSKI
18300 VON KARMAN
SUITE 500
IRVINE CA 92612
Phone: 949-224-7211
E-mail: [email protected]
ADFFDFDFFADTTAFFTTADAAFDTAAFFAFTAFAADTDFTDADFTTFDFFFTFDAFDFDADTFT 000000404 18 SP 000638998208180 P
252
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001110010010
10011011100100000101
10101110110001000110
10000100011100100001
10010101000010001100
10010100100100110011
11000000001101000010
11011010011100010101
10000000100111100000
11101000010100011011
10000010000110010100
10100101101110111011
10001110001011101100
10011111110000010101
10111100010000111110
11010010010011100101
10101011001010100010
11111111111111111111
Market And Cost Reconciliation 3
Cash Reconciliation 4
Asset Summary 5
Asset Detail 6
Income Accrual Detail 10
Investment Activity 12
Plan Expenses 14
Purchases 15
Sales And Maturities 18
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
......................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
SchedulePage
TABLE OF CONTENTS
253
*IncludesProfessionalFees,ContractAdministratorFeesandInvestmentAdvisoryFees Interest284.77284.77
Dividends11,246.3611,246.36
Change In Unrealized Gain/Loss 102,122.36.00
Net Accrued Income (Current-Prior)- 13.95- 13.95
Administrative Expenses*- 620.64- 620.64
Trust Fees- 679.34- 679.34
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
06/30/202506/30/2025
MARKET BOOK VALUE
Beginning Market And Cost 3,583,072.64 3,615,325.50 Investment Activity
Total Investment Activity 113,639.5411,517.18 Plan Expenses
Total Plan Expenses- 1,299.98- 1,299.98
Net Change In Market And Cost 112,339.5610,217.20 Ending Market And Cost 3,695,412.20 3,625,542.70
MARKET AND COST RECONCILIATION
MARKET AND COST RECONCILIATION MESSAGES
254
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001110010010
10011011100000000101
10101110110001001110
10000100011101010001
10010101000010011000
10010011100110011011
11000000001111110100
11011010001111001101
10000000110101010000
11101000001000010011
10000011000010011000
10100111000110000011
10001111001000111100
10011011111001100101
10100101011110000110
11010000010110001101
10101001001010000010
11111111111111111111
*IncludesProfessionalFees,ContractAdministratorFeesandInvestmentAdvisoryFees Interest284.77
Dividends11,246.36
Cash Equivalent Purchases- 3,957.97
Mutual Fund Purchases- 7,573.16
Cash Equivalent Sales1,299.98
Administrative Expenses*- 620.64
Trust Fees- 679.34
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
Beginning Cash.00
Investment Activity
Total Investment Activity1,299.98
Plan Expenses
Total Plan Expenses- 1,299.98
Net Change In Cash.00
Ending Cash.00
CASH RECONCILIATION
CASH RECONCILIATION MESSAGES
255
EstimatedAnnualIncomeisanestimateprovidedforinformationalpurposesonly andshouldnotbereliedonformakinginvestment,trading,ortaxdecisions.The estimatesmaynotrepresenttheactualvalueearnedbyyourinvestmentsand theyprovidenoguaranteeofwhatyourinvestmentsmayearninthefuture.
Cash And Equivalents79,696.9579,696.95 2.15
Mutual Funds-Equity 2,159,124.79 2,062,231.26 58.43 Mutual Funds-Fixed Income 1,456,319.64 1,483,343.67 39.41 Accrued Income270.82270.82 0.01
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
06/30/202506/30/2025% OF
ASSETSMARKETBOOK VALUEMARKET
Total Assets 3,695,141.38 3,625,271.88 99.99 Grand Total 3,695,412.20 3,625,542.70 100.00 Estimated Annual Income98,137.93
ASSET SUMMARY
ASSET SUMMARY MESSAGES
CASH EQUIV & ACCR
MUTUAL FUNDS
256
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011111100010101
10101110110001011110
10000100011101010001
10010101000010001000
10010010100010001011
11000000001110110000
11011010011011001101
10000000111110010000
11101000110001000011
10000010110001000100
10100000001111011011
10001100111011010000
10011110000001101111
10101011011101010110
11011011110101011101
10101011001010000010
11111111111111111111
First Am Govt 79,696.95079,696.9579,696.95.0079,696.95270.82 Ob Fd Cl X1.0000.00.00 4.26
31846V336 Asset Minor Code 1
Cohen & 2,067.886 101,884.74 108,337.08- 6,452.34 108,337.08.00 Steers Instl Realty Shares49.2700- 204.85- 6,452.34 3.04 19247U106 Asset Minor Code 98
Columbia541.60016,399.6515,386.861,012.7915,386.86.00
Small Cap Growth Inst330.28001,326.921,012.79 0.00
19765Y340 Asset Minor Code 98
Columbia 7,134.127 276,804.13 276,997.17- 193.04 276,997.17.00 Contrarian Core Fund38.800014,767.65- 193.04 0.65
19766M709 Asset Minor Code 98
Fidelity 4,351.198 249,454.18 226,243.7923,210.39 226,243.79.00 International Index Fund57.33006,091.6823,210.39 2.71 315911727 Asset Minor Code 98
Emerald608.70016,532.2916,285.74246.5516,285.74.00
Growth Institutional27.16001,570.44246.55 2.49
317609253 Asset Minor Code 98
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)ADJ PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ADJ PRIOR MARKETENDING ACCRUAL
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODUNREALIZED GAIN/LOSSYIELD ON MARKET Money Markets
Total Money Markets 79,696.95079,696.9579,696.95.0079,696.95270.82 .00.00 4.25
Total Cash And 79,696.95079,696.9579,696.95.0079,696.95270.82 Equivalents.00.00 4.25
Mutual Funds-Equity
ASSET DETAIL
Cash And Equivalents
Mutual Funds
257
Goldman Sachs 4,008.89490,801.4591,130.42- 328.9787,393.89.00 Gqg Ptnrs Intl Opps R622.65001,563.473,407.56 2.00
38147N269 Asset Minor Code 98
Hartford 10,279.039 195,404.53 179,738.7515,665.78 179,738.75.00 Schroders Emerging Markets19.010011,512.5215,665.78 1.17 41665X859 Asset Minor Code 98
Lazard Cl 3,314.25259,523.9753,993.265,530.7153,993.26.00 List Infrastr Inst17.9600334.245,530.71 2.76
52106N459 Asset Minor Code 98
Mfs 1,976.43494,453.7891,320.063,133.7291,320.06.00 International Growth R647.79002,391.483,133.72 1.47
552746356 Asset Minor Code 98
Nyli Cbre 3,856.27055,028.9753,636.671,392.3054,455.73.00 Global Infrastructure14.2700- 76.44573.24 2.14
56064L280 Asset Minor Code 98
Putnam Core 2,593.270 117,163.94 113,995.403,168.54 113,995.40.00 Equity Fund Y45.18005,834.863,168.54 0.70
74676P839 Asset Minor Code 98
Schwab U S 34,811.000 850,780.84 797,711.3853,069.46 797,711.38.00 Large Cap Etf24.440039,684.5453,069.46 1.17
808524201 Asset Minor Code 94
Undiscovered424.94634,892.3237,454.68- 2,562.3637,454.68.00 Mgrs Behavioral Value82.1100968.88- 2,562.36 2.02
904504479 Asset Minor Code 98
Baird 40,287.823 396,835.06 404,836.33- 8,001.27 404,836.33.00 Aggregate Bond Fd Instl9.85004,823.73- 8,001.27 4.06
057071854 Asset Minor Code 99
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)ADJ PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ADJ PRIOR MARKETENDING ACCRUAL
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODUNREALIZED GAIN/LOSSYIELD ON MARKET Total Mutual Funds-Equity 75,967.616 2,159,124.79 2,062,231.2696,893.53 2,059,313.79.00 85,765.3999,811.00 1.47
Mutual Funds-Fixed Income
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
ASSET DETAIL (continued)
258
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011111000011101
10101110110001001110
10000100011101100101
10010101000011101100
10010001100001110001
11000000001010011000
11011010011101001101
10000000101111000000
11101001011101000011
10000011111100011100
10100101101111110011
10001111101001110100
10011001100001111101
10110000010110011010
11001100010000001101
10101001101010101010
11111111111111111111
Dodge Cox 18,386.322 232,403.11 240,318.86- 7,915.75 240,318.86.00 Income12.64001,648.79- 7,915.75 4.22
256210105 Asset Minor Code 99
Ishares Core 3,602.000 357,318.40 361,166.85- 3,848.45 361,166.85.00 U.S. Aggregate Bond Etf99.20003,962.20- 3,848.45 3.81 464287226 Asset Minor Code 95
Nyli MacKay 12,794.46666,659.1767,376.21- 717.0467,376.21.00 High Yield Corp Bd Fd R65.2100763.62- 717.04 6.24
56063N881 Asset Minor Code 99
Pgim Total 22,560.143 271,624.12 278,174.36- 6,550.24 278,174.36.00 Return Bond Cl R612.04003,370.48- 6,550.24 4.73
74440B884 Asset Minor Code 99
Voya 14,957.882 131,479.78 131,471.068.72 131,471.06.00 Intermediate Bond Fund Class R68.79001,788.158.72 4.77 92913L569 Asset Minor Code 99
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)ADJ PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/MARKETSINCE INCEPTION/ADJ PRIOR MARKETENDING ACCRUAL
DESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTPRICE/UNITBOOK VALUECURRENT PERIODUNREALIZED GAIN/LOSSYIELD ON MARKET Total Mutual Funds-Fixed 112,588.636 1,456,319.64 1,483,343.67- 27,024.03 1,483,343.67.00 Income16,356.97- 27,024.03 4.31
Total Mutual Funds 188,556.252 3,615,444.43 3,545,574.9369,869.50 3,542,657.46.00 102,122.3672,786.97 2.61
Total Assets 268,253.202 3,695,141.38 3,625,271.8869,869.50 3,622,354.41270.82 102,122.3672,786.97 2.65
Accrued Income.000270.82270.82
Grand Total 268,253.202 3,695,412.20 3,625,542.70 00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
ASSET DETAIL (continued)
259
Timeoftradeexecutionandtradingparty(ifnotdisclosed)willbeprovideduponrequest.
Publiclytradedassetsarevaluedinaccordancewithmarketquotationsorvaluationmethodologiesfromfinancialindustryservicesbelievedbyustobereliable.Assetsthatarenot publiclytradedmaybereflectedatvaluesfromotherexternalsources.Assetsforwhichacurrentvalueisnotavailablemaybereflectedatapreviousvalueorasnotvalued,atparvalue, oratanominalvalue.Valuesshowndonotnecessarilyreflectpricesatwhichassetscouldbeboughtorsold.Valuesareupdatedbasedoninternalpolicyandmaybeupdatedless frequentlythanstatementgeneration.
Forfurtherinformation,pleasecontactyouraccountmanagerorrelationshipmanager.
YieldonMarketandAccruedIncomeareestimatesprovidedforinformationalpurposesonlyandshouldnotbereliedonformakinginvestment,trading,ortaxdecisions.Theestimates maynotrepresenttheactualvalueearnedbyyourinvestmentsandtheyprovidenoguaranteeofwhatyourinvestmentsmayearninthefuture.
Theassetcategoriesusedinthisstatementmaybegeneralinnature.Forexample,assetslistedunderthe"MutualFunds"categorymayincludeopen-endinvestmentcompanies registeredundertheInvestmentCompanyActof1940(whicharecommonlyknownas"mutualfunds")butmayalsoincludeclosed-endinvestmentcompanies,unitinvestmenttrusts, commontrustfunds,collectivetrustfundsorotherinvestmentsthatareregisteredwith(ornotsubjecttoregistrationwith)theSecuritiesandExchangeCommission.
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
ASSET DETAIL MESSAGES
260
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011110100000101
10101110110001000010
10000100011101111101
10010101000010100100
10010000100100111111
11000000001001101110
11011010000010111101
10000000111111111000
11101000111001000011
10000011110010000000
10100111011100011011
10001100010101101100
10010110101000101011
10111110001111101010
11000111010111001101
10101000001010011010
11111111111111111111
79,696.950First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X 0.04284.77270.82284.77270.82 31846V33607/01/25
2,067.886Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares 1.50.00952.58952.58.00 19247U10606/30/2506/30/25
3,314.252Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst 0.50.00355.21355.21.00 52106N45906/20/2506/23/25
3,856.270Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure 0.31.00493.76493.76.00 56064L28006/30/2506/30/25
34,811.000Schwab U S Large Cap Etf 0.29.002,509.872,509.87.00 80852420106/25/2506/30/25
40,287.823Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl 0.40.001,326.031,326.03.00 05707185406/24/2506/25/25
18,386.322Dodge Cox Income 0.53.002,509.782,509.78.00
25621010506/25/2506/26/25
3,602.000Ishares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond Etf 3.78.001,163.331,163.33.00 46428722606/02/2506/05/25
12,794.466Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6 0.33.00351.27351.27.00 56063N88106/30/2506/30/25
22,560.143Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6 0.57.001,086.561,086.56.00 74440B88412/22/2206/30/25
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Cash And Equivalents
Total Cash And Equivalents284.77270.82284.77270.82
Mutual Funds-Equity
Total Mutual Funds-Equity.004,311.424,311.42.00
Mutual Funds-Fixed Income
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL
261
14,957.882Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6 0.42.00497.97497.97.00 92913L56906/30/2506/30/25
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/EXPAYANNBEGINNINGINCOMEINCOMEENDING
FACE AMOUNTDESCRIPTIONDATEDATERATEACCRUALEARNEDRECEIVEDACCRUAL Total Mutual Funds-Fixed Income.006,934.946,934.94.00
Grand Total284.7711,517.1811,531.13270.82
INCOME ACCRUAL DETAIL (continued)
262
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011110000011101
10101110110001011010
10000100011100100101
10010100000010010000
10010111100101100001
11000000001110110100
11011010010011011101
10000000111111001000
11101001110011110011
10000011110010100000
10100000101110000011
10001100101101000100
10010001110010011111
10100011000011101010
11001100110010111101
10101001101010000010
11111111111111111111
06/02/2025Interest From 5/1/25 To 5/31/25284.77
06/24/20250.033025 USD/Share On 40,152.652 Shares Due 6/25/251,326.03 Dividend Payable 06/25/25
06/30/20250.465 USD/Share On 2,048.552 Shares Due 6/30/25952.58 Dividend Payable 06/30/25
06/25/20250.138 USD/Share On 18,186.816 Shares Due 6/26/252,509.78 Dividend Payable 06/26/25
06/05/20250.322969 USD/Share On 3,602 Shares Due 6/5/251,163.33 06/20/20250.10783 USD/Share On 3,294.206 Shares Due 6/23/25355.21 Dividend Payable 06/23/25
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Interest
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
31846V336
Total Interest284.77
Dividends
Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl
057071854
Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares
19247U106
Dodge Cox Income
256210105
Ishares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond Etf
464287226
Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst
52106N459
Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure
56064L280
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
263
06/30/20250.1292 USD/Share On 3,821.669 Shares Due 6/30/25493.76 Dividend Payable 06/30/25
06/30/20250.0276 USD/Share On 12,727.044 Shares Due 6/30/25351.27 Dividend Payable 06/30/25
06/30/2025Dividend From 6/1/25 To 6/30/251,086.56
06/30/2025Schwab U S Large Cap Etf2,509.87
0.0721 USD/Share On 34,811 Shares Due 6/30/25
06/30/2025Dividend From 6/1/25 To 6/30/25497.97
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6
56063N881
Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6
74440B884
Schwab U S Large Cap Etf
808524201
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6
92913L569
Total Dividends11,246.36
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)
264
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011101100000101
10101110110001000010
10000100011100110101
10010100000011100000
10010110100110011101
11000000001000101010
11011010001110011101
10000000111010000000
11101001000011011011
10000011100111100000
10100001110011111011
10001000011100000000
10000000101011111011
10100001010011001100
11001011110001001101
10101010101010100010
11111111111111111111
06/26/2025Paid To Phase II Systems- 620.64
Pars Trust Admin Fee
Per Directive Dated 06/24/25
06/26/2025Collected- 679.34
Charged For Period 05/01/2025 Thru 05/31/2025
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
DATEDESCRIPTIONCASH
Administrative Expenses
Contract Administrator Fees
Administrative Fee
Total Administrative Fee- 620.64
Total Contract Administrator Fees- 620.64
Total Administrative Expenses- 620.64
Trust Fees
Trust Fees
Total Trust Fees- 679.34
Total Trust Fees- 679.34
Total Plan Expenses- 1,299.98
PLAN EXPENSES
265
06/03/2025Purchased 284.77284.770.00- 284.77284.77
Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/3/25
31846V336
06/05/2025Purchased 1,163.330.00- 1,163.331,163.33 1,163.33 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/5/25
31846V336
06/30/2025Purchased 2,509.870.00- 2,509.872,509.87 2,509.87 Units Of
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/30/25
31846V336
06/30/2025Purchased 19.33419.334.00- 952.58952.58
Shares
Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares @ 49.27 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
19247U106
06/20/2025Purchased 20.04620.046.00- 355.21355.21
Shares
Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst @ 17.72 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/23/25
52106N459
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Cash And Equivalents
Total First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X 3,957.970.00- 3,957.973,957.97 Total Cash And Equivalents 3,957.970.00- 3,957.973,957.97 Mutual Funds-Equity
Total Cohen & Steers Instl Realty Shares19.334.00- 952.58952.58
PURCHASES
266
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011101000001101
10101110110001010010
10000100011100000001
10010100000010000100
10010101100101100111
11000000001100000010
11011010001000011101
10000000101011010000
11101000101111011011
10000010101010111000
10100100010011010011
10001011001110100100
10000111001011101001
10111010011000000000
11011100010100011101
10101000001010001010
11111111111111111111
06/30/2025Purchased 34.60134.601.00- 493.76493.76
Shares
Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure @ 14.27 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
56064L280
06/24/2025Purchased135.171.00- 1,326.031,326.03
135.171 Shares
Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl @ 9.81 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/25/25
057071854
06/25/2025Purchased199.506.00- 2,509.782,509.78
199.506 Shares
Dodge Cox Income @ 12.58 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/26/25
256210105
06/30/2025Purchased 67.42267.422.00- 351.27351.27
Shares
Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R6 @ 5.21 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
56063N881
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Total Lazard Cl List Infrastr Inst20.046.00- 355.21355.21 Total Nyli Cbre Global Infrastructure34.601.00- 493.76493.76 Total Mutual Funds-Equity73.981.00- 1,801.551,801.55
Mutual Funds-Fixed Income
Total Baird Aggregate Bond Fd Instl135.171.00- 1,326.031,326.03 Total Dodge Cox Income199.506.00- 2,509.782,509.78
Total Nyli MacKay High Yield Corp Bd Fd R667.422.00- 351.27351.27 PURCHASES (continued)
267
06/30/2025Purchased 90.24690.246.00- 1,086.561,086.56
Shares
Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R6 @ 12.04 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
74440B884
06/30/2025Purchased 56.65256.652.00- 497.97497.97
Shares
Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R6 @ 8.79 USD
Through Reinvestment Of Cash Dividend Due 6/30/25
92913L569
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
SHARES/
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONCASHBOOK VALUE
Total Pgim Total Return Bond Cl R690.246.00- 1,086.561,086.56 Total Voya Intermediate Bond Fund Class R656.652.00- 497.97497.97 Total Mutual Funds-Fixed Income548.997.00- 5,771.615,771.61 Total Purchases 4,580.948.00- 11,531.1311,531.13 PURCHASES (continued)
268
1010101010101010101010110011010000000011
10101010001010010010
10011011100100010101
10101110110001011110
10000100011100011001
10010100000011001100
10010100100000101001
11000000001111110100
11011010010111101101
10000000111011101000
11101001001011011011
10000010100100100100
10100110100000111011
10001000110010111100
10001000000010111111
10110100000001110000
11010111010011011101
10101001101010111010
11111111111111111111
Realizedgain/lossshouldnotbeusedfortaxpurposes.
06/26/2025Sold 679.34- 679.340.00679.34- 679.34.00- 679.34 Units Of.00
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/26/25
31846V336
06/26/2025Sold 620.64- 620.640.00620.64- 620.64.00- 620.64 Units Of.00
First Am Govt Ob Fd Cl X
Trade Date 6/26/25
31846V336
00273201
30- -01-B -62 -185-01
0102 -11-02877-01
PARS/CITY OF LINCOLN 115P-PENSION
Period from June 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025
PRIOR MARKET /
SHARES/TRANSACTIONREALIZEDPRIOR MARKET
DATEDESCRIPTIONFACE AMOUNTCOMMISSIONPROCEEDSBOOK VALUEGAIN/LOSSREALIZED GAIN/LOSS Cash And Equivalents
Total First Am Govt Ob Fd- 1,299.980.001,299.98- 1,299.98.00- 1,299.98 Cl X.00
Total Cash And- 1,299.980.001,299.98- 1,299.98.00- 1,299.98 Equivalents.00
Total Sales And- 1,299.980.001,299.98- 1,299.98.00- 1,299.98 Maturities.00
SALES AND MATURITIES
SALES AND MATURITIES MESSAGES
269
SUBJECT:
Staff Recommends the City Council Adopt a Resolution
Authorizing a Budget Augmentation of $250,000 from the
Available Unencumbered Balance of Fund 2410 to CIP 622, Police Department IT Room Expansion Project, and Authorize the City Engineer to Approve Change Orders not to exceed $375,400 for Additional Changes During Construction. (Araceli Cazarez)
SUBMITTED BY:
Araceli Cazarez
DEPARTMENT:
Engineering
DATE:
August 26, 2025
Item Number 7.I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a budget augmentation of $250,000 from the available unencumbered balance of Fund 2410 to CIP 622 – Police Department IT Room Expansion Project, and authorize the City Engineer to approve change orders not to exceed $375,400 for additional changes during construction.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
On February 13, 2024, City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award the contract for construction with CNW Construction, Inc. for $627,000 and authorize the City Engineer to approve change orders up to $125,400 for the Police Department IT Room Expansion Project.
The project was originally intended to convert the old evidence storage area into a new IT room with additional office space and evidence processing area. However, during construction, a few changes in the design were made and the new layout includes:
IT server room (approximately 15’x13’)
Expansion of women’s locker room (approximately 8’x13’) in lieu of the new office.
Card reader access added to door previously not identified as being necessary New entry from existing locker room into new expansion area New platforms for lockers.
Evidence processing room (approximately 14’x23’) with:
Power in ceiling for retractable cords
Isolated air circulation
Power outside of wall for battery charging stations.
With these changes, the original $125,400 contingency was significantly impacted by approximately $68,000. There were several other changes that prompted additional costs, including addition of T-bar ceiling, replacement of existing door, fiber optic, and power conduit
STAFF REPORT
270
modifications for an additional $20,000 in contingency cost.
However, there is one pending change order that will exceed the project contingency; during the preparation phase for the installation of the new 1200-amp switchgear, the subcontractor, JTE, requested that the PG&E commitment drawings be provided to facilitate proper coordination with PG&E. Once the drawings were received, JTE initiated coordination efforts with PG&E to finalize approval of the new switchgear and plan the necessary work for replacing the existing 600-amp switchgear. During the onsite review, it was discovered that the existing switchgear only contained (2) 4-inch conduits. Based on PG&E and Greenbook’s requirements, the contractor informed the team that (4) 5-inch conduits would be required for the new 1200-amp gear. Further review of the PG&E commitment drawings confirmed this requirement and indicated that the applicant is responsible for installing the conduits.
However, although this requirement is clearly shown in the PG&E commitment drawings, those drawings were not included in the original bid documents provided to the Contractor.
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
Based on the installation of the required conduits, this is a change in scope and the work is necessary for PG&E to provide service for the new switchgear. Based on the additional work that needs to be completed, including labor and material, the additional $250,000 will bring the total contingency amount to $375,400.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., and as further governed by 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378. Even if this project were subject to CEQA, the City Council finds this project exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 14 C.C.R. § 15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is an approved budgeted CIP from fiscal year 2023/25. The project is funded as follows:
Budgeted
CIP 622 Police Department IT Room Expansion
Fund 2410 $950,000
Encumbered project costs
Fund 2410
Stantec - Design $102,050
Actual Project Costs
Fund 2410
Construction (CNW Construction, Inc.) $627,000
Construction Contingency (20%) $125,400
Construction Management/Inspection $ 94,050
Total Project Cost to Date $846,450
Available Unencumbered Project Budget $15,202
Remaining Estimated Project Costs
271
Fund 2410
Additional Estimated Construction Cost $250,000
Budgeted Augmentation Requested
Fund 2410 $(250,000)
Fund Balances
Fund Balance prior to Amendment Updated Fund Balance Fund 2410 $1,995,728 $1,745,728
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution, 2025 - PD IT Budget Augmentation.docx
272
Resolution No. 2025-
RESOLUTION 2025-
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A BUDGET AUGMENTATION OF $250,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE UNENCUMBERED BALANCE OF FUND 2410 TO CIP 622 –
POLICE DEPARTMENT IT ROOM EXPANSION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDERS NOT TO EXCEED $375,400 FOR
ADDITIONAL CHANGES DURING CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, the budget for FY 2023/25 includes CIP 622 Police Department IT Room Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, the project is funded by Fund 2410 – PFE - Police; and
WHEREAS, during construction a few changes in the design were made that impacted the contract and original contingency; and
WHEREAS, additional coordination with PG&E for the new switchgear installation has prompted additional project cost not originally captured when the project was bid; and
WHEREAS, the additional work is expected to exceed the current contingency.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
The City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes a budget augmentation of $ 250,000 from the available unencumbered balance of Fund 2410 to CIP 622 – Police Department IT Room Expansion Project and authorize the City Engineer to approve change orders not to exceed $375,400 for additional changes during construction.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor
ATTEST:
273
Resolution No. 2025-
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
274
SUBJECT:
Waive Second Reading and Adopt by Title only an Ordinance acting in its capacity as the legislative body of the City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) authorizing the levy of Special Taxes. (Nita Wracker) SUBMITTED BY:
Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT:
Finance
DATE:
August 26, 2025
Item Number 7.J
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council waive second reading and adopt by title only Ordinance 1098B, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of the City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) authorizing the levy of Special Taxes.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
On August 12, 2025, the City Council adopted a Resolution establishing the City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) and Calling an Election therein, and adopted a Resolution Determining Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness for City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East), and adopted a Resolution Certifying Election Results. Additionally City Council waived first reading and introduced by title only Ordinance 1098B, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of the City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) authorizing the levy of Special Taxes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Special Tax rates range from $3,464 for units under 1,625 sq/ft to $4,016 for units greater than 2,000 sq/ft. The special taxes will escalate annually by 2%.
ATTACHMENTS:
4._Ordinance__City_of_Lincoln_CFD_No._2025-1__Joiner_Ranch_East___4929-9503- 5732_3.docx
STAFF REPORT
275
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
Draft of July 23, 2025
4929-9503-5732v3/024161-0011
ORDINANCE NO. 1098B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING I N ITS CAPACITY AS TH E LEGISLATIVE BODY O F CITY OF LINCOLN COMM UNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1 (JOINER
RANCH EAST) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Lincoln (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-087 declaring its intention to form City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) (the “District”) pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, comprising Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”), and its Resolution No. 2025-088 declaring its intention to incur bonded indebtedness for the District; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, after providing all notice required by the Act, the Ci ty Council conducted a noticed public hearing required by the Act relative to the proposed formation of the District, the proposed levy of a special tax therein to finance certain public facilities described in Resolution No. 2025-087 and to secure the payment of any bonded indebtedness of the District, and the proposed issuance of bonded indebtedness in one or more series in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $ 23,500,000, as described in Resolution No. 25-088; and
WHEREAS, at the August 12, 2025 public hearing, all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the proposed levy of the special tax to finance the facilities described in Resolution No. 2025-087 and to secure the payment of bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $ 23,500,000 of the District as described in Resolution No. 2025-088 (the “Bonds”) were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No s. 2025-120, 2025-121, and 2025-122 which formed the District and called a special election within the District on August 12, 2025 on three propositions relating to the levy of a special tax within the District, the issuance of the Bonds and the establishment of an appropriations limit within the District; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, a special election was held within the District at which the qualified electors approved by more than a two thirds vote Propositions A, B, and C authorizing the levy of a special tax within the District for the purposes described in Resolution 2025-120, the issuance of the Bonds as described in Resolution No. 2025-121 and establishing an appropriations limit for the District; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA,
ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF LINCOLN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025 -1 (JOINER R ANCH EAST) DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
276
2 4929-9503-5732v3/024161-0011
Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.
Section 2. By the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to Sections 53328 and 53340 of the Act at the rates and in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment set forth in Attachment C to Resolution No. 2025-087, which is incorporated by reference herein (the “Rate and Method”). The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in the fiscal year specified in the Rate and Method and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of the Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the Bonds), payment of all costs of the public facilities and services authorized to be financed by the District, and payment of all costs of administering the District.
Section 3. Each of the Mayor, the City Manager, the Assistant City Manager , the Director of Finance, or their written designees (each, an “Authorized Officer”), acting alone, is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rates and amounts to be levied in such fiscal year on each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Rate and Method. The special tax rate levied on a parcel pursuant to the Rate and Method shall not exceed the maximum rate set forth in the Rate and Method for such parcel, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate. Each Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Placer and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year, and with respect to Special Tax, until the Bonds are paid in full, the facilities have been paid for, and provision has been made for payment of all of the administrative costs of the District.
Section 4. Properties or entities of the state, federal or other local governments shall be exempt from the special tax, except as o therwise provided in Sections 53317.3 and 53317.5 of the Act and Section G of the Rate and Method. No other properties or entities are exempt from the special tax unless the properties or entities are expressly exempted in Resolution No. 2025- 120 or in a resolution of consideration to levy a new special tax or special taxes or to alter the rate or method of apportionment or an existing special tax as provided in Section 53334 of the Act.
Section 5. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided f or in the Act, the Rate and Method and Resolution No. 2025-120.
Section 6. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes (which such procedures include the exercise of all rights and remedies permitted by law to make corrections, including, but not limited to, the issuance of amended or supplemental tax bills), a s such procedure may be modified by law or by this City Council from time to time.
Section 7. As a cumulative remedy, if any amount levied as a special tax for payment of the interest or principal of the Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the Bonds), together with any penalties and other charges accruing under this Ordinance, are not paid when due, the City Council may, not later than four years after the due date of the last installment of principal on the Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the Bonds), order that the same be collected by an action brought in the superior court to foreclose the lien of such special tax, as authorized by the Act.
277
3 4929-9503-5732v3/024161-0011
Section 8. The Mayor of the City shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk (referred to herein as the “City Clerk”) shall attest to the Mayor’s signature and then cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Lincoln New Messenger, a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Lincoln.
Section 9. The specific authorization for adoption of this Ordinance is pursuant to the provisions of Section 53340 of the Act.
Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the Treasurer -Tax Collector of the County of Placer, and to perform all other acts which are required by the Act, this Ordinance or by law in order to accomplish the purpose of this Ordinance.
Section 11. A full reading of this Ordinance is dispensed with prior to its final passage, a written or printed copy having been available to the City Council and the public a day prior to its final passage.
Section 12. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its final passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
RECUSED:
______________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor
[Seal]
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
278
SUBJECT:
Lincoln Public Library Funding and Community Aspirations Report from Constructive Disruption, Inc. (Kathryn Hunt) SUBMITTED BY:
Kathryn Hunt
DEPARTMENT:
Library
DATE:
August 26, 2025
Item Number 9.A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council receive the
Lincoln Public Library Funding and Community
Aspirations Report from Constructive Disruption, Inc.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
In November 2024, staff executed a contract with Constructive Disruption, Inc. for a report assessing both current library services and community aspirations regarding library services.
This report was triggered by the City Council’s strategic goal 10 to conducting an analysis of current and future City library service and facility needs, as well as the June 30 th
, 2024 notice
that Sierra College would be withdrawing from the Lincoln Public Library at Twelve Bridges Joint Use Agreement on June 30, 2025. The goal of the report project was to gain important information about what services community aspired to receive from their library, as well as an assessment of how changes to library funding could affect the library’s ability to meet these community aspirations.
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
Between December 2024 and May 2025, Constructive Disruption, Inc. staff worked with library staff and members of the project planning team to collect community input. This included input from the project planning team members and their networks; the Library Advisory Board and Library Advisory Committee; library staff of all levels; and the community at large via a public survey, outreach materials distributed via library programs, and community town hall and design thinking events. The final report synthesized this information with data from the Library and City planning documents. This report highlights the impact of funding on library services historically, and identifies three potential paths forward: a reduction in services due to the loss of Sierra College’s contribution, a maintenance of current funding, and the challenges of adding a new partner with new service expectations. There is also a discussion of what a more robustly funded model of the library may be able to provide, and some general recommendations. All of the paths other than the funded model present challenges to
STAFF REPORT
279
providing the library services the community desires, given that the Library is currently funded well below the state median per capita and the current demands on the General Fund.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact, as this is a report only.
ATTACHMENTS:
Lincoln Library Funding and Community Aspirations Report 2025.pdf 280
Lincoln
Library
Funding
and
Community
Aspirations
Report
Prepared by Constructive Disruption
2025
281
Lincoln Library Funding and
Community Aspirations Report
Executive Summary 2
History of Lincoln 5
Community Demographics 8
An Overview of the Lincoln Public Library 1 2
Lincoln Public Library’s Budget in Context 16
Comparing Lincoln With Its Peers 20
The Lincoln Community’s Vision of the Library 2 6
Strengths 2 6
Opportunities 2 7
Aspirations 30
Paths Forward for the Lincoln Public Library 3 3
A Loss in Service: Maintaining a single-location service point at Twelve Bridges with 75% of the current budget 3 6
The status quo: maintaining a single-location service point at Twelve Bridges with the current budge t 3 9
Adding a new partner — and adding additional services 4 2 A Funded Model 4 5
Future Considerations for Library Service 5 2
Notes on Developing the Paths Forward 5 3
Methodology and Resources 5 6
About Constructive Disruption 63
page 1
282
Executive Summary
The
Lincoln
Public
Library
is
facing,
in
2025
and
the
next
several
years
to
come,
a
significant
challenge
with
its
budget,
as
Sierra
College,
an
original
participant
in
the
joint
use
agreement
for
the
Twelve
Bridges
location,
has
given
its
notice
to
withdraw
from
the
agreement.
This
withdrawal
causes
the
Library
to
lose
25%,
worth
$222,212
in
the
FY25
budget,
of
its
budget.
While
the
City
has
agreed
to
sustain
the
Library
at
current
levels
in
order
to
give
time
for
new
solutions
to
be
found,
the
situation
is
grave.
There
are
no
good
options
for
the
replacement
of
these
funds
in
the
timeframe
needed.
Lincoln
as
a
community
has
enjoyed
a
sustained
period
of
rapid
growth,
which
is
anticipated
to
continue
throughout
the
next
several
decades.
Growing
from
a
community
of
approximately
12,000
in
2000
to
more
than
50,000
today,
projections
from
the
General
Plan
estimate
Lincoln
will
have
more
than
130,000
residents
within
the
next
25 years.
During
this
time
of
rapid
growth,
however,
Lincoln
has
faced
financial
challenges,
and
the
Library’s
budget
has
not
been
able
to
grow
at
the
pace
necessary
to
maintain
a
steady
level
of
services;
the
Lincoln
Public
Library’s
budget,
if
it
had
maintained
a
level
of
support
since
2008
in
pace
with
the
growth
of
population
and
with
inflation,
should
be
125%
larger
than
the
FY23
allocation,
at
approximately
$2,242,422.
Not
only
does
Lincoln
have
to
grapple
with
this
immediate
budget
shortfall,
it
must
do
so
while
grappling
with
decades
of
underinvestment
that
have
left
the
Library
without
the
ability
to
withstand
funding
and
service
cuts.
At
the
same
time,
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
staff
have
been
working
hard
to
serve
students
and
the
community
in
this
challenging
funding
environment,
and
provide
a
level
of
service
that
far
exceeds
the
available
resources
in
all
categories
.
When
compared
to
their
peers
in
terms
of
staffing
expenditures
and
staffing
capacity,
it
cannot
be
overstated
how
thoughtful,
efficient,
and
committed
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
staff
are
to
ensuring
patrons
receive
personalized
and
meaningful
service.
Lincoln’s
overall
expenditures
are
less
than
half
of
the
statewide
median,
and
only
29%
of
the
statewide
average;
only
29 of
the
186
public
libraries
in
California
have
a
lower
page
2 283
overall
expenditure
per
capita.
Furthermore,
of
the
182
public
libraries
in
California
who
reported
staff
expenditure
data,
only
19 have
a
lower
per
capita
figure
of
spending
on
staff
than
Lincoln.
This
low
level
of
investment
is
out
of
alignment
with
the
City’s
plans
and
policies
that
demonstrate
support
for
a
proportionate
and
thoughtful
level
of
library
service
that
is
accessible
to
members
across
the
community.
What
is
essential
to
note
is
that,
even
at
its
current
level
of
funding,
and
certainly
before
the
25%
reduction
that
comes
from
Sierra
College
pulling
out
of
the
joint
use
agreement,
the
Library
is
not
able
to
adequately
meet
the
demand
of
either
its
public
or
school
stakeholders
because
it
does
not
have
enough
staff.
This
report
shares
the
three
most
likely
paths
for
library
service
in
Lincoln
over
the
next
five
years:
●
A
loss
in
service:
maintaining
a
single-location
service
point
at
Twelve
Bridges
with
75%
of
the
current
budget.
This
report
recommends
the
services
provided
by
the
Library
be
restructured
to
more
adequately
represent
the
investment
by
each
remaining
party:
the
City
funds
85%
of
the
budget,
as
well
as
holding
the
responsibility
for
maintenance.
The
hours,
services,
programs,
and
collections
must
be
repositioned
to
ensure
the
significant
majority
of
the
benefit
of
library
services
will
directly
impact
community
users,
as
opposed
to
users
from
the
school.
Service
at
this
level
will
see
a
40-50%
cut
in
staffing
and
open
hours.
●
The
status
quo:
maintaining
a
single-location
service
point
at
Twelve
Bridges
with
the
current
budget.
For
this
option
to
be
viable
in
the
timeframe
necessary
requires
additional
investment
from
the
school
district
and
a
reopening
and
renegotiation
of
the
MOU.
●
Adding
a
new
partner
—
and
adding
additional
services.
The
City
wishes
to
see
a
new
partner
come
in
to
replace
Sierra
College;
replacing
the
funding
lost
by
Sierra
College’s
withdrawal
by
finding
a
new
partner
will
not
maintain
current
Library
service
because
that
partner
will
come
with
service
expectations
and
the
need
for
additional
infrastructure
to
manage
the
level
of
investment.
Since
page
3 284
any
new
partner
providing
such
a
substantial
annual
investment
will
expect
to
see
services
that
meet
their
needs
commensurate
with
that
investment,
this
path
means
even
if
the
City
is
able
to
find
such
a
substantial
partner,
there
will
not
be
an
increase
in
access,
hours,
or
service
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
location.
This
report
does
contain
suggestions
for
what
a
funded
model
could
look
like.
Such
a
model
would
incorporate
the
kinds
of
services
and
offerings
the
community
expressed
their
interest
in
during
the
engagement
portion
of
this
project
and
focus
strongly
on
opportunities
for
increased
access.
page
4 285
History of Lincoln
The
city
of
Lincoln
was
founded
in
1859,
then
as
a
village,
when
the
original
townsite
was
surveyed.
Intended
to
be
a
temporary
terminus
of
the
California
Central
Railroad,
the
railroad’s
president,
Charles
Lincoln
Wilson,
gave
the
town
its
name.
Lincoln
was
formally
incorporated
in
1890.
Lincoln
has
a
long
history
of
settlement
from
well
before
the
railroad,
beginning
with
the
Nisenan,
Miwuk,
and
Maidu
peoples,
who
are
indigenous
to
Northern
California
and
have
been
present
on
their
homelands
in
what
is
now
the
greater
Sacramento
Metropolitan
Area
for
more
than
5,000
years.
Until
termination
by
Congress
in
1964,
the
area
was
home
to
multiple
rancherias,
or
mini-reservations,
including
the
Nevada
City
Rancheria
of
the
Nisenan
and
the
Auburn
Rancheria
of
the
Miwuk
and
Maidu,
now
part
of
the
United
Auburn
Indian
Community
(UAIC).
The
UAIC
owns
and
operates
the
Thunder
Valley
Casino
Resort,
the
area’s
first
casino,
which
opened
in
2003.
Following
the
completion
of
the
railroad,
which
continued
on
past
Lincoln,
the
town
remained
relatively
small
until
the
discovery
of
coal
in
the
1870s,
which,
during
mining,
uncovered
high
quality
clay
deposits.
As
a
result
of
these
clay
deposits,
Gladding,
McBean
&
Co.
was
founded
in
1875
and
remains
a
leading
industry
in
Lincoln,
noted
as
a
ceramics
and
architectural
terracotta
pioneer
—
Gladding,
McBean
&
Co.
terracotta
is
what
makes
up
the
distinctive
architecture
of
many
of
the
buildings
at
Stanford
University,
for
example.
Even
as
this
industry
grew,
the
areas
surrounding
downtown
or
central
Lincoln
remained
mostly
agricultural
or
rural.
Lincoln
remained
“sleepy”
until
the
mid
1990s,
when
the
greater
Sacramento
Metropolitan
Area
saw
a
significant
level
of
rapid
development.
Between
2000,
when
the
population
was
approximately
12,000,
and
2010,
when
it
had
grown
to
43,000,
Lincoln
grew
by
282
percent;
at
the
time,
Lincoln
was
the
fastest-growing
city
over
10,000
in
the
United
States,
and
was
the
fastest-growing
city
in
California
for
two
years
in
a
row
prior
to
the
2008-2009
recession.
The
2020
census
shows
Lincoln
to
have
a
population
of
approximately
49,000,
and
the
most
recent
California
Public
Library
Statistics
,
from
2022-2023,
shows
the
population
at
52,313.
page
5 286
The
City
of
Lincoln
has
an
ambitious
plan
for
expansion
and
annexation
that
will,
once
finished,
potentially
grow
the
population
to
more
than
130,000,
with
an
anticipated
doubling
of
the
current
population
to
approximately
100,000
in
the
next
20-25
years.
The
village
concept,
laid
out
in
the
General
Plan
Update
adopted
in
March
2008,
plans
for
seven
individual
villages
within
the
city,
each
linked
to
Lincoln’s
historic
downtown,
which
will
act
as
a
central
gathering
place
for
the
community.
Each
village
is
planned
to
have
its
own
commercial
center,
a
mix
of
high
density,
medium
density,
and
low
density
residential
areas
interconnected
by
walking
and
biking
trails,
and
a
high
level
of
open
and
green
space
to
help
retain
the
“small
town
feel.”
City
of
Lincoln
Development
Map
of
Lincoln
As
Lincoln
grows,
city
leadership,
through
the
village
model,
has
expressed
a
dedication
to
retaining
what
made
Lincoln
special
when
it
was
a
city
of
10,000.
Lincoln
Mayor
Holly
Andreatta,
when
speaking
with
Business
View
Magazine
in
2022,
shared,
“There
are
so
many
special
characteristics
about
Lincoln
that
make
it
home.
Lincoln
is
growing,
but
the
downtown
holds
us
all
together.
It’s
still
got
that
old
feel
to
it.”
This
feeling
about
Lincoln
was
also
mentioned
in
focus
groups
held
as
part
of
this
project,
page
6 287
with
planning
team
participants
noting
that
“Lincoln
is
growing
VERY
fast
—
how
[do
we]
keep
what
is
special…
why
people
are
moving
here.”
Former
City
Council
member
Paul
Joiner,
in
the
same
article
as
Mayor
Andreatta,
added
“[w]e’ve
heard
two
phrases
from
visitors
and
from
folks
who
are
new
to
Lincoln,
they
say
it’s
like
Mayberry,
or
it’s
like
Hallmark.
Yes,
the
architecture
and
our
history
play
a
role
in
that,
but
it’s
the
people
that
make
Lincoln
great,
and
it’s
the
people
that
you
want
to
be
around.”
City
Manager
Sean
Scully
said,
“What
I
think
is
really
different
about
Lincoln
is
that
it
is
a
blend
between
rural
lifestyle
and
modern
convenience.
We’re
not
a
center
point
of
all
commerce
in
Placer
County,
but
if
you
live
in
the
community,
most
of
the
things
that
are
really
important
to
families
exist
here
and
are
really
nice.
It’s
a
very
diverse
place,
and
it
really
does
feel
like
Hallmark
or
Norman
Rockwellian
Americana.”
This
approach
has
been
consistent
for
decades.
In
the
“Lincoln
Today”
section
of
the
2003
Community
Library
Needs
Assessment
prepared
by
Stockton
Associates,
the
consultants
at
the
time
wrote:
[t]he
city
has
a
small,
historic
town
charm
that
most
residents
want
to
see
continued.
This
is
evidenced
by
the
strong
desire
for
the
existing
Carnegie
Library
to
continue
to
function
as
a
library
after
the
new
library
is
built.
Long-time
residents
can
easily
get
the
feeling
that
their
town
is
being
overtaken
by
newcomers
anxious
to
bring
their
urban
lifestyles
to
the
small
town,
yet
many
newcomers
to
Lincoln
want
precisely
to
"get
away"
from
the
big
city,
urban
environment.
Lincoln's
citizens
and
town
government
have
dealt
with
this
immense
change
and
has
developed
a
"can
do"
approach
to
city
governance
and
citizen
involvement.
The
town
clearly
welcomes
newcomers
yet
wants
to
maintain
as
much
of
the
benefits
of
a
small
town
as
possible.
While
Lincoln
today
is
in
the
midst
of
an
enormous
transition,
it
maintains
its
direction
as
a
family-oriented
community,
a
good
place
to
raise
children,
maintain
family
values,
and
create
a
sense
of
history
and
roots.
A
place
where
everyone
is
welcome.
page
7 288
Community Demographics
The
population
of
Lincoln
has
experienced
significant
growth
over
the
past
15 years,
with
the
population
rising
from
11,205
in
2000
to
nearly
52,000
today.
With
more
than
a
half-dozen
new
neighborhoods
under
construction,
there
are
thousands
of
homes
planned
for
residency
over
the
coming
25 years.
This
residential
development
will
nearly
triple
the
population
of
Lincoln.
Development
is
through
a
planned
growth
strategy
around
a
“village”
concept,
with
each
village
integrating
its
own
residential,
commercial
and
recreational
areas.
At
the
concept
level,
there
should
be
incorporated
into
each
village
infrastructure
and
operational
support
to
sustain
and
anchor
the
delivery
of
library
services
at
the
village
level.
The
2023
Lincoln
population
is
51,629.
1 up
6.3%
from
the
2010
Census
count
of
42,819.
Age
2 The
median
age
in
Lincoln
is
nearly
44 years
old,
with
32%
of
the
population
aged
60 and
above.
The
youth
population
(under
24)
is
30%
of
the
community.
38%
of
the
community
is
in
the
prime
of
their
working
ages,
from
24 through
59 years
old.
In
generational
terms,
Lincoln
is
a
young
place.
The
2 U.S.
Census
Bureau.
"Age
and
Sex."
American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Tables,
Table
B19001,
2023.
Accessed
on
April
1,
2024.
1 American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Tables.
Accessed
on
April
1,
2024.
page
8 289
younger
Generations
Alpha
&
Beta,
and
Gen
Z
comprise
the
majority
of
the
population
(52%).
Generation
X
is
a
smaller
percentage
of
the
whole;
1 out
of
6 belong
to
this
group
(16%).
Even
smaller
is
the
silent
generation;
at
8%
fewer
than
1 out
of
10 belong.
One
quarter
of
the
population
are
baby
boomers
(24%).
Race
&
Ethnicity
3 7
out
of
10 community
members
in
Lincoln
are
white
(72%),
while
1 out
of
12 are
Asian.
There
are
significantly
smaller
populations
of
American
Indian
(3%),
Black
or
African
American
(4%)
or
Native
Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander
(1%).
Together,
1 out
of
12 residents
belong
to
these
groups.
The
Hispanic
/
Latino
population
crosses
several
race
categories.
Together,
this
segment
of
Lincoln
is
1 out
of
5 people
(19%).
The
majority
of
the
Hispanic
/
Latino
population
is
of
Mexican
origin
(74%).
Language
Spoken
at
Home
4 Most
people
in
Lincoln
speak
English
at
home
(85%).
For
those
who
speak
another
language
at
home,
the
predominant
language
is
Spanish
(48%),
followed
by
other
Indo
European
languages
(26%)
and
then
by
Asian
languages
(22%).
4 U.S.
Census
Bureau.
"Language
Spoken
at
Home.”
American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Tables,
2023.
Accessed
on
April
1,
2024.
3 U.S.
Census
Bureau.
"Demographic
and
Housing
Estimates.”
American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Tables,
2023.
Accessed
on
April
1,
2024.
page
9 290
Housing
&
Households
5 There
are
19,481
households
in
Lincoln.
In
the
coming
25 years,
it
is
anticipated
that
the
number
of
households
will
increase
by
50%
as
a
result
of
planned
development.
The
Village
1 and
7 developments
underway
will
alone
increase
the
number
of
households
by
25%.
Economics
6 The
median
individual
income
in
Lincoln
is
just
above
the
rest
of
the
State
of
California.
Lincoln
CA
USA
$51,978
$49,595
$42,220
Similarly,
the
median
household
income
is
close
to
the
rest
of
the
State
of
California.
Lincoln
CA
USA
$108,108
$95,521
$80,610
A
closer
look
at
household
income
provides
a
more
nuanced
view:
6 U.S.
Census
Bureau.
"Household
Income
in
the
Past
12 Months
(in
2023
Inflation-Adjusted
Dollars)."
American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Table.
Accessed
on
April
1,
2024.
5 U.S.
Census
Bureau.
"Households
and
Families."
American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Tables,
2023.
Accessed
on
April
1,
2024.
page
10 291
1 out
of
5 households
earn
nearly
double
the
median
household
income
(20%),
and
almost
half
of
households
make
less
than
the
median
household
income
(45%).
This
data
suggests
there
to
be
a
wealth
disparity
when
considering
household
income
in
Lincoln,
looking
at
the
highest
and
lowest
levels
of
earning.
With
the
scale
of
planned
development,
the
distribution
of
housing
types
(for
example,
in
Village
7,
36%
of
the
planned
units
will
be
for
low
density
residential
—
larger
homes
on
larger
lots,
and
therefore,
higher
price
points
—
while
half
of
that,
18%,
is
allocated
for
high
density
residential,
which
will
be
more
likely
to
include
affordable
housing
and
apartment
options),
and
the
relative
cost
of
new
housing
overall,
it
can
be
anticipated
that
the
wealthiest
and
most
highly
educated
segments
of
the
population
for
Lincoln
is
the
segment
that
will
continue
to
grow.
This
profile
aligns
in
many
cases
with
the
projections
in
the
2003
Community
Library
Needs
Assessment
prepared
by
Stockton
Associates,
which,
in
section
5.4,
“Lincoln’s
Future,”
shared:
We
can
anticipate
that
this
group
of
new
residents
will
have
a
higher
average
education
level
than
the
current
average
Lincoln
resident,
that
a
large
portion
of
them
will
be
young
families
with
children,
that
there
will
be
a
large
portion
of
55+
new
residents
due
to
the
increase
in
housing
stock
in
the
retirement
communities
of
Lincoln,
and
that
there
will
be
more
diversity
among
the
new
residents,
reflective
of
the
general
trend
throughout
California.
The
Lincoln
resident
of
the
future
will
probably
be
very
different
from
the
resident
of
today,
but
will
have
many
of
the
same
values.
page
11 292
An Overview of the Lincoln Public Library
Lincoln’s
first
library
was
built
about
twenty
years
after
incorporation,
in
1909,
and
was
funded
by
a
Carnegie
grant
with
the
required
community
funding
coming
from
Gladding,
McBean
&
Co.
and
Lincoln
residents.
Located
downtown,
the
Carnegie
library
served
the
community
for
over
a
hundred
years
before
closing
in
2011.
Prior
to
the
Carnegie,
Lincoln's
earliest
library
facility
was
an
1890
reading
room
in
Ahart’s
Hall,
opened
the
year
that
Lincoln
was
incorporated
and
supported
by
public
taxation
starting
in
1904.
1n
1906,
Mabel
Prentiss,
a
State
Library
organizer,
appeared
before
the
Lincoln
city
board
of
trustees
and
explained
state
law
relative
to
establishment
of
public
libraries
and
spurring
the
interest
and
investment
that
resulted
in
the
support
for
the
Carnegie
library
facility
and
its
services.
Lincoln’s
current
library,
located
in
the
Twelve
Bridges
area,
was
opened
in
2007
to
support
the
tremendous
growth
that
Lincoln
had
experienced
in
the
early
2000s.
The
large,
modern
40,000
square
foot
library
was
designed
as
a
joint-use
library,
with
a
unique
three-way
agreement
between
the
Western
Placer
Unified
School
District,
Sierra
College,
and
the
City
of
Lincoln.
The
co-located
Twelve
Bridges
High
School
opened
in
2021;
Sierra
College’s
co-located
campus
was
not
built,
and,
after
ten
years
of
support
for
the
facility,
is
withdrawing
page
12 293
from
the
joint
use
agreement
as
of
June
2025.
The
joint
use
agreement
has
the
City
funding
60%
of
the
library’s
budget,
Sierra
College,
25%,
and
the
Western
Placer
Unified
School
District,
15%.
Lincoln
has
a
small
staff
—
6.52 full
time
equivalent,
or
FTE
—
tasked
with
providing
services
to
the
over
1,200
students
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
High
School
as
well
as
the
Lincoln
community.
The
Library
is
open
an
average
of
36 hours
a
week,
and
offers:
●
a
large
collection;
●
multiple
digital
collection
offerings,
including
OverDrive,
Kanopy,
and
Hoopla;
●
materials
on
Native
American
history,
issues,
and
culture,
funded
annually
with
the
United
Auburn
Indian
Community;
●
significant
seating
space;
●
multiple
meeting
rooms
of
varying
sizes,
including
small
study
rooms;
●
40 public
access
computers;
●
exam
proctoring;
●
adult
literacy
tutoring,
via
volunteers;
●
remote
pickup
via
holds
lockers
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
location
and
the
Lincoln
Community
Center;
and,
●
a
small
outreach
program,
offering
off-site
engagement
and
programs.
In
2022-2023,
Lincoln
Public
Library
held
354
programs,
with
an
attendance
of
7,953.
Lincoln
is
a
member
of
the
NorthNet
Library
System,
a
consolidated
regional
system
of
over
40 libraries
in
northern
California,
and
one
of
nine
similar
systems
throughout
the
state
supported
in
part
by
the
California
State
Library.
NorthNet
Library
System
members
share
resources,
participate
in
aggregated
purchasing
of
materials,
and
collaborate
on
programming
and
staff
training,
with
a
goal
“to
achieve
efficiencies
and
realize
further
economies
of
scale.”
page
13 294
Budget
The
Library’s
operating
(non-capital)
budget
in
FY
2022-2023
was
reported
to
be
$975,699,
and
the
main
expenditures
are
presented
in
the
table
below.
Lincoln’s
total
budget
for
its
library
ranks
it
in
the
9th
percentile
compared
to
the
rest
of
the
State.
54%
of
the
total
budget
is
expended
on
staffing.
This
cost
is
relatively
low
compared
to
other
libraries,
reflecting
the
small
size
of
the
staff.
37%
of
the
budget
is
allocated
to
annual
operating
costs.
9%
of
the
budget
is
allocated
to
collections.
Public
Facilities
Elements
(PFE)
fees
are
used
to
fund
library
collections.
Most
libraries
strive
to
spend
at
least
10%
of
their
annual
budget
on
their
collections.
Lincoln
is
at
9%,
but
these
collection
funds
are
not
funds
guaranteed
through
the
municipal
budget;
they
are
funded
through
PFE
fees,
which
are
by
nature
intended
to
support
the
expansion
of
library
services
in
relation
to
the
growth
of
the
community.
Right
now,
the
PFE
fees
are
subsidizing
the
Library
budget
instead
of
additively
supporting
the
expansion
of
library
collections
or
other
infrastructure
development
in
support
of
community
growth.
The
Lincoln
Public
Library
is
further
supported
by
the
Friends
of
Lincoln
Library
(FOLL),
which
was
awarded
the
2025
Service
Organization
of
the
Year
Award
by
the
page
14 FY
2022-2023
Lincoln
Public
Library
Total
Budget
$975,699
Salaries
&
Wages
$397,779
Staff
benefits
$127,036
Physical
collections
$56,350
Digital
collections
$27,057
Other
annual
operating
costs
$364,832
295
Lincoln
Area
Chamber
of
Commerce.
FOLL
gives
approximately
$100,000
per
year
to
support
the
Library,
including,
in
2025:
●
$22,500
to
support
literacy
programs
and
programs
for
young
people,
such
as
Read
Across
Lincoln,
the
Summer
Reading
Program,
Read
to
Me
Baby
Literacy
Kits,
Family
Story
Time,
Free
Book
Giveaways,
School
Tours,
and
the
Teen
Advisory
Board
Meetings;
●
$38,000
for
the
library’s
collection,
including
Large
Books,
Adult
Spanish
Language
Books,
Children
and
Teen
Magazines,
Hoopla,
and
Kanopy;
●
$35,950
for
library
programs,
events
and
outreach
activities,
such
as
Mother
Goose
on
the
Loose,
Family
Movie
Night,
the
Downtown
Book
Locker,
Monthly
Newsletter,
Community
Outreach
Activities,
and
Group
Library
Tours.
As
with
the
PFE
fees,
the
level
of
support
from
the
Friends
is
a
double-edged
sword:
the
funding
is
essential
to
supporting
and
providing
these
services,
access,
and
programs,
but
the
majority
of
these
items
are
core
services
of
the
Library
and
should
be
fully
funded
and
represented
in
the
Library’s
municipal
budget
with
any
annual
discretionary
funding
supporting
capital
projects
and
additional
access.
page
15 296
Lincoln Public Library’s Budget in Context
Historical
Budget
Overview,
Lincoln
Public
Library
7 Over
the
past
fifteen
years,
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
has
had
a
wildly
variable
annual
budget.
The
first
three
years
in
the
table
demonstrate
spending
that
supported
service
in
both
the
Carnegie
and
Twelve
Bridges
libraries,
with
the
budget
fifteen
years
ago
17%
greater
than
it
is
currently.
Expenditures
per
capita
have
also
varied
significantly,
from
a
low
of
$8.64
in
2012-2013
to
a
high,
in
2008-2009,
of
$27.29.
It
can
be
challenging
to
maintain
service
levels
and
retain
staff
with
such
variable
funding,
and
as
can
be
clearly
seen
by
the
7 California
State
Library.
California
Public
Library
Statistics:
State
Data
Key
Ratios,
Resources,
Expenditure
,
ca.countingopinions.com/index.php?page_id=3
.
Accessed
19 April
2025.
page
16 Year
Total
Operating
Budget
Expenditures
Per
Capita
%
of
Expenditure
on
Staffing
2008-2009
$1,197,177
$27.29
64.28%
2009-2010
$944,783
$22.67
53.75%
2010-2011
$814,222
$18.83
50.44%
2011-2012
$496,713
$11.40
57.88%
2012-2013
$378,793
$8.64
58.63%
2013-2014
$434,671
$9.62
49.30%
2014-2015
Statistics
not
reported
accurately
2015-2016
$705,912
$11.32
55.37%
2016-2017
$600,851
$11.78
56.99%
2017-2018
$608,133
$12.39
51.74%
2018-2019
$890,265
$15.77
51.93%
2019-2020
$1,144,310
$16.20
49.54%
2020-2021
$867,037
$15.75
51.76%
2021-2022
$943,271
$18.26
59.86%
2022-2023
$996,632
$18.65
53.79%
297
dashed
orange
line
in
the
chart
below,
representing
the
trend
of
funding
overall,
which
shows
that
funding
has
not
been
keeping
pace
with
growth
over
the
past
15 years,
even
as
the
City
has
made
investments
in
the
library
following
the
significant
financial
struggles
following
2009.
In
that
time,
Lincoln
has
added
approximately
10,000
new
residents
while
the
overall
support
for
library
services
have
continued
to
decline;
any
allocation
of
City
funds
must
keep
pace
with
population
growth
in
order
to
maintain
the
current
level
of
services
the
Library
provides
—
while
also
noting
that
public
expectations
for
library
service
are
still
at
the
levels
provided
before
the
budget
cuts.
In
the
2050
General
Plan,
developed
in
2008,
there
are
multiple
policies
that
suggest
the
library
should
have
seen
continued
investment
over
these
past
15 years;
these
policies
are
part
of
Goal
PSF-9
in
the
Community
Facilities
section:
“To
ensure
that
adequate
community
facilities
are
provided
and
are
conveniently
located
in
order
to
meet
the
needs
of
residents
of
the
city.”
Policy
statements
include:
●
Policy
PFS‐9.3
Expand
Library
Services
The
City
shall
continue
to
expand
library
services,
according
to
adopted
City
library
standards
(0.7
square
feet
per
capita),
to
meet
the
educational,
informational,
and
cultural
needs
of
all
community
residents.
page
17 298
●
Policy
PFS‐9.4
Funding
Mechanism
for
Libraries
The
City
shall
provide
a
funding
mechanism
for
the
construction
and
operation
of
libraries
within
the
city.
●
Policy
PFS‐9.5
Siting
of
Libraries
The
City
shall
locate
libraries
near
or
adjacent
to
other
City
facilities,
such
as
schools
and
parks,
wherever
possible.
●
Policy
PFS‐9.6
Community
Facilities
The
City
shall
ensure
that
community
facilities,
including
a
senior
/
adult
services
center,
gymnasiums,
aquatic
center,
and
library,
be
planned
and
provided
for
future
residents
of
the
city.
These
policy
statements
suggest
that
the
City
intended,
at
the
time
of
developing
their
long-range
plan,
to
more
than
double
the
available
library
square
footage
(0.7
square
feet
per
resident
×
the
eventual
130,000
residents
equals
a
total
of
91,000
square
feet
of
library
service
space);
ensure
library
services
were
funded
by
the
City;
that
libraries
would
be
located
near
schools
and
parks,
both
of
which
are
well-represented
in
the
various
village
annexation
plans;
and
that
these
kinds
of
municipally
funded
community
facilities
(parks,
libraries,
community
centers)
were
important
and
vital,
not
just
for
residents
now,
but
for
future
residents.
These
sentiments
are
a
continuation
of
decades
of
similar
perspectives
on
the
importance
of
library
services,
stretching
back
to
1988,
when,
as
highlighted
in
the
2003
Community
Library
Needs
Assessment:
[T]he
City
Council
adopted
a
General
Plan
that
recognized
the
need
to
expand
or
replace
public
facilities,
including
additional
library
services.
The
Public
Facilities
element
of
the
General
Plan,
amended
in
1998,
supported
Library
facilities
construction
and
suggested
an
additional
24,000
square
feet
of
library
space
would
be
required
to
meet
the
library
needs
of
the
community.
The
Facilities
Element
further
stated
that
libraries
should
be
located
adjacent
to
other
facilities
such
as
schools
and
parks,
wherever
possible.
Community
sentiment
reflects
the
need
for
additional
library
services
and
supports
the
idea
of
joint-use
facilities.
However,
after
the
work
to
develop
the
joint
use
service
agreement
and
the
adoption
of
the
2050
General
Plan,
City
investment
in
the
library
moved
in
the
opposite
direction,
starting
a
steep
downward
decline,
dropping
to
approximately
a
third
of
the
page
18 299
investment
in
the
Library
at
the
time
of
the
plan’s
drafting
and
reducing
available
library
hours
and
square
footage.
In
the
years
following
the
development
of
the
General
Plan,
Lincoln
faced
significant
financial
issues,
with
the
City
overall
facing
a
65%
reduction
in
its
budget
between
FY08
and
FY12.
As
then
City
Manager
Jim
Estep
shared
in
the
FY09
budget
narrative,
“[t]his
past
year
the
City
of
Lincoln
faced
its
most
challenging
budget
shortfall
in
30 years…
commercial
and
industrial
development
has
fallen
short
in
providing
the
tax
base
needed
for
core
city
services.”
Each
of
the
next
several
years
saw
additionally
challenging
budget
years;
all
general
fund
departments
were
impacted
by
staff
reductions
and
significant
budget
cuts.
In
the
FY11
budget
narrative,
City
Manager
Estep
shared,
“Over
the
last
three
years
the
City
has
struggled
to
maintain
the
level
of
service
provided
by
the
departments
funded
by
the
General
Fund.
Different
strategies
have
been
used
each
year
to
develop
a
budget
that
balances
service
levels
and
funding
availability,
but
each
year,
for
the
past
three
years,
the
City
has
had
to
use
one-time
revenue
and
staffing/operating
expense
reductions
as
revenues
continued
to
plummet.
In
2007-08
the
General
Fund
budgeted
expenditures
equated
to
$456
per
capita,
and
this
year
those
expenditures
are
budgeted
to
drop
to
$281
per
capita
(a
38 percent
reduction).”
In
FY12,
much
of
the
same:
“The
question
facing
the
City
is
how
to
continue
to
provide
the
level
of
service
that
the
citizens
of
Lincoln
expect
with
greatly
reduced
numbers.”
Even
if
Lincoln
had
wanted
to
maintain
a
level
of
support
for
library
services,
the
financial
situation
did
not
allow
the
municipality
to
do
so.
However,
even
after
the
impact
of
these
factors
years
later,
investment
has
not
returned
at
similar
levels
to
support
service,
never
mind
a
growth
in
service.
page
19 300
Comparing Lincoln With Its Peers
When
considering
the
work
of
a
library
and
its
level
of
investment
or
support,
it
can
be
helpful
to
look
at
key
statistics
in
comparison
with
other
California
libraries.
Drawing
from
the
most
recent
California
Public
Library
Statistics
,
covering
2022-2023,
it
is
possible
to
position
Lincoln’s
access
to
resources
against
those
across
the
state,
with
the
statistics
and
their
comparisons
giving
a
sense
of
the
impact
of
the
library’s
use
and
strength
of
its
funding.
While
these
figures,
as
with
many
of
the
figures
in
the
report,
are
several
fiscal
years
old,
using
them
allows
us
to
ensure
a
like-for-like
comparison
of
fiscal
years
across
libraries
and
the
state
as
a
whole.
In
the
table
below,
Lincoln
Public
Library
is
compared
against
the
statewide
median
(which
draws
the
line
between
the
top
and
bottom
half
of
the
state)
and
the
statewide
average.
California’s
libraries
are
incredibly
diverse,
and
the
statewide
average
can
be
a
challenging
figure,
as
within
the
state
there
are
some
significantly
underfunded
libraries
as
well
as
multiple
libraries
with
substantial
service
areas
and
even
more
substantial
budgets.
page
20 FY
2022-2023
Lincoln
Public
Library
Statewide
Median
Statewide
Average
Library
visits
per
capita
4.02 2.12
3.39 Collection
per
capita
2.10 1.83
2.55 Content
Use
per
capita
5.95 4.12
6.73 Expenditures
per
capita
$18.65
$41.11
$65.18
Staff
Expenditures
per
capita
$10.03
$30.54
$44.28
Total
Staff
FTE
per
1,000
population
0.12 .30
.44
301
In
order
to
help
place
Lincoln
in
context,
the
key
statistics
are
represented
in
terms
of
a
number
per
capita,
which
further
balances
these
large
discrepancies.
The
table
shows
statistics
for
library
visits
per
capita;
for
how
many
physical
collection
items
are
owned
per
capita;
the
content
use,
which
is
the
circulation
of
physical
materials
plus
the
circulation,
use,
or
access
of
digital
materials,
per
capita;
the
overall
expenditures
per
capita;
the
expenditures
just
on
staff
per
capita;
and,
finally,
the
number
of
staff
per
1,000
people
the
library
serves.
As
evidenced
by
the
table,
Lincoln
is
well
above
the
median
for
visits
per
capita,
which
may
be
explained
in
part
by
library
use
by
students
and
in
support
of
the
school,
as
well
as
highlighting
anecdotal
evidence
from
community
engagement
about
residents
from
around
the
greater
Sacramento
area
choosing
to
use
Lincoln’s
library
over
other
area
libraries.
It
is
also
especially
notable
considering
the
Library’s
limited
hours.
Similarly,
the
collection
and
content
use
per
capita
demonstrate
that
the
collection
offers
access
to
more
materials
than
the
typical
Californian
public
library.
Again,
some
of
this
may
be
driven
by
school
use,
and
the
collection
size
is
certainly
a
result
of
the
joint
use
agreement,
especially
when
considering
the
opening
day
collection
items
that
were
included
to
potentially
support
Sierra
College
students.
It
is
important
to
note
that
the
collection
size,
currently
around
121,600
items,
is
significantly
older,
with
67%
of
the
items
with
publication
and/or
acquisition
dates
ten
or
more
years
old;
approximately
18%
of
the
collection
has
not
circulated
in
the
last
five
years.
When
looking
at
the
resources
Lincoln
Public
Library
has
access
to
in
order
to
provide
the
services
highlighted
above,
the
picture
is
stark.
Lincoln’s
overall
expenditures
are
less
than
half
of
the
statewide
median,
and
only
29%
of
the
statewide
average;
only
29 of
the
186
public
libraries
in
California
have
a
lower
overall
expenditure
per
capita.
Of
the
182
public
libraries
in
California
who
reported
staff
expenditure
data,
only
19 have
a
lower
per
capita
figure
of
spending
on
staff
than
Lincoln.
Lincoln’s
expenditure
of
$10.03
per
capita
is
one-third
of
the
state
median
and
23%
of
the
state
average.
With
only
6.52 full
time
equivalents
of
staff
time,
Lincoln
Public
Library’s
twelve
staff
members
are
having
to
manage
a
large
facility,
a
complex
joint
use
page
21 302
agreement,
and
a
significant
collection
for
competing
audiences
and
interests
with
extremely
limited
resources.
When
considering
these
expenditure
figures,
it
is
important
to
remember
they
represent
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
at
their
current
level
of
funding.
If
the
Library
has
to
take
a
25%
cut
to
its
budget,
those
figures
drop
to
$13.99
(overall
expenditures
per
capita)
and
$7.52
(staff
expenditures
per
capita,
assuming
staff
expenses
take
a
proportionate
cut).
At
$13.99
per
capita
for
overall
expenditures,
only
12 libraries
in
the
state
have
a
lower
rate
of
support;
at
$7.52
per
capita
for
staffing,
Lincoln
drops
into
the
bottom
ten
libraries
in
the
state
overall,
with
only
nine
libraries
having
a
lower
per
capita
expenditure
rate
on
staff.
It
may
be
further
illuminating
to
compare
Lincoln’s
figures
with
those
libraries
typically
seen
as
comparisons
by
the
Library
and
the
City,
and
which
are
also
located
in
the
same
geographic
region:
Roseville,
Folsom,
and
the
Placer
County
Library
system.
FY
2022-2023
Lincoln
Public
Library
Roseville
Folsom
Placer
County
Library
visits
per
capita
4.02 2.38
2.05 1.39
Collection
per
capita
2.10 1.07
1.11 1.04
Content
Use
per
capita
6.08 7.63
6.59 3.79
Expenditures
per
capita
$18.65
$24.55
$25.65
$41.11
Staff
Expenditures
per
capita
$10.03
$16.26
$16.79
$26.73
Total
Staff
FTE
per
1,000
population
0.12 0.19
0.17 0.23
Lincoln
Public
Library
often
uses
nearby
Roseville
for
peer
comparisons.
Roseville
functions
as
a
reference
point
because
of
its
geographic
adjacency
and
because
page
22 303
community
members
report
comparing
Lincoln
services
to
those
offered
in
Roseville,
with
its
larger
size
and
larger
sales
tax
base.
In
looking
at
the
table
on
the
previous
page,
Lincoln
Public
Library
does
have
more
visits
per
capita
and
a
larger
collection
per
capita,
but
Roseville
sees
about
17%
more
use
from
a
collection
that
is
nearly
half
the
size
of
Lincoln’s
—
suggesting
the
items
offered
by
Roseville
are
more
pertinent
to
the
community
and/or
are
in
better
alignment
with
the
needs
of
patrons
using
the
space.
Lincoln
spends
approximately
24%
less
on
its
library
per
capita
than
Roseville,
and
38%
less
per
capita
on
staff,
though
that
figure
is
roughly
in
alignment
with
the
size
difference
of
the
staff.
Spending
in
alignment
with
Roseville
would
add
$308,647
to
Lincoln’s
budget
at
its
FY23
levels,
for
a
total
of
$1,027,279;
applied
to
staffing,
that
could
result
in
an
additional
3.5 FTE
for
Lincoln.
Folsom
is
often
used
as
a
greater
Sacramento
area
comparison
that
is
seen
as
more
in
alignment
with
Lincoln,
as
it
is
a
municipal
library
with
a
single
location.
Again,
as
with
Roseville,
Lincoln
sees
higher
use
in
terms
of
visits
and
offers
a
larger
collection;
Folsom’s
collection
is
used
at
a
slightly
lower
rate
than
Lincoln’s.
Folsom
spends
about
27%
more
on
its
library
per
capita
than
Lincoln,
and
slightly
more
on
their
staffing,
as
their
staff
is
about
30%
larger
than
Lincoln’s
but
their
expenditures
on
staff
is
approximately
40%
greater
than
Lincoln’s.
Funding
staff
expenses
at
the
same
level
as
Folsom
would
result
in
an
additional
$353,635
to
Lincoln’s
FY23
budget,
for
a
total
of
$1,350,267,
which
would
support
an
additional
4 FTE.
There
is
an
awareness
that
Placer
County
Library
as
a
system
has
experienced
its
own
financial
difficulties,
but
that
awareness
may
not
align
with
the
real
basis
of
comparison.
Considering
the
disparity
between
Lincoln
and
Placer
County
noted
in
the
table
above,
it
is
likely
Lincoln
would
benefit
from
joining
the
County
system,
at
least
in
the
short
term;
what
would
be
saved
on
the
consolidation
of
services
would
likely
support
the
number
of
staff
Lincoln
needs
to
run
its
Twelve
Bridges
facility.
If
retaining
local
control
and
retaining
access
to
library
services
in
Lincoln,
by
Lincoln,
for
Lincoln
is
a
priority,
the
City
of
Lincoln
needs
to
invest
more
substantially
in
the
library
than
the
current
level.
page
23 304
If
we
choose
to
compare
Lincoln’s
expenditures
per
capita
and
the
percentage
of
the
budget
spent
on
staffing
with
just
its
counterparts
in
Placer
County
—
Roseville,
Loomis,
and
the
Placer
County
Library
system
—
Lincoln
has
the
lowest
per
capita
funding
and
the
lowest
expenditure
on
staff
by
far,
as
demonstrated
in
the
table
below
comparing
the
four
library
service
providers.
If
Lincoln
were
to
support
the
library
at
the
county
average
of
$35.20
per
capita,
which
would
still
place
Lincoln
in
the
bottom
50%
of
libraries
in
the
state
for
funding
per
capita
,
the
Library’s
budget
would
nearly
double,
adding
an
additional
$865,780
to
the
FY23
budget,
for
a
total
of
$1,862,412.
Long
term,
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
staff
are
managing
to
provide
a
level
of
service
that
far
exceeds
the
available
resources
in
all
categories.
The
staff’s
ability
to
do
so
is
seen
by
stakeholders
as
a
strength;
for
example,
Board
members
share
that
the
statistics
for
visits
and
use
demonstrate
library
“services
resonates
with
our
residents,”
that
partnerships
with
the
Friends
and
the
school
district
“allows
us
to
maximize
what
we
can
each
do,”
that
the
“beautiful,
welcoming”
multi-use
facility
is
“an
untapped
resource,”
and
that
“staff
and
customer
service
is
A+...
[there
is]
attention
to
each
individual
patron.”
They
also
highlight
the
need
for
a
“focus
on
sustainability,
and
not
just
for
cost
savings.”
page
24 Library
Total
Operating
Budget
Expenditures
Per
Capita
%
of
Expenditure
on
Staffing
Lincoln
$996,632
$18.65
53.79%
Loomis
$373,163
$56.48
75.79%
Roseville
$3,754,875
$24.55
66.24%
Placer
County
$8,157,658
$41.11
65.03%
County
average
$35.20
65.21%
305
Over
the
past
17 years,
the
community
has
increased
its
population
by
24%.
At
the
same
time,
the
Library
budget
has
contracted
overall
1%
each
year,
so
that
today
it
is
17%
lower
than
it
was
in
2008.
If
we
consider
inflation
over
this
time
period
8 ,
in
purchasing
power,
the
Library’s
budget
has
shrunk
45%
over
the
same
time
period.
To
further
emphasize
how
hard
working
the
staff
of
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
are,
consider
that,
over
this
time
period
when
the
population
is
growing
and
the
budget
has
been
diminishing,
they
have
offered
nearly
the
same
level
of
access
as
in
2009/2010
in
terms
of
hours
open
to
the
public,
when
the
two
library
facilities
offered
a
combined
42 hours
of
access
a
week
compared
to
the
current
average
of
36 hours
per
week.
The
Lincoln
Public
Library’s
budget,
if
it
had
maintained
a
level
of
support
since
2008
in
pace
with
the
growth
of
population
and
with
inflation,
should
be
125%
larger
than
the
FY23
allocation,
at
approximately
$2,242,422.
For
every
$4
in
funding
Lincoln
is
allocating
to
the
Library,
it
should
be
$9.
Anything
less
has,
over
each
of
these
intervening
years,
represented
a
loss
in
funding
and
in
service
opportunities
for
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
and
the
community
it
serves.
This
path
of
decreasing
financial
support
in
the
face
of
population
growth
and
City
expansion
directly
contradicts
the
village
concept
model
and
is
critically
underfunding
library
services
—
even
before
the
loss
of
funding
from
Sierra
College
pulling
out
of
the
joint
use
agreement.
8 U.S.
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics.
Consumer
Price
Index
Calculator.
https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
page
25 306
The Lincoln Community’s Vision of the Library
The
Lincoln
Public
Library
is
a
great
example
of
a
library
working
as
hard
as
possible
within
its
constraints.
Output
measures
discussed
elsewhere
in
this
report,
such
as
annual
visits
and
circulation
of
materials,
speak
to
strengths
in
the
face
of
fiscal
adversity.
Community
engagement
provides
additional
insights.
The
Methodology
section
beginning
on
page
55 details
the
community
engagement
techniques
deployed
as
part
of
the
research
and
analysis
for
this
report,
especially
as
it
relates
to
strengths,
opportunities,
and
aspirations.
One
of
these
techniques
was
a
community
survey
taken
by
1,847
individuals,
which
is
referenced
in
this
report
as
“Community
Survey”
or
“survey.”
Other
techniques
involved
interviews,
focus
groups,
and
various
opportunities
for
in-person,
virtual,
and
self-directed
engagements.
Strengths
The
Library’s
strongest
connection
to
the
community
is
by
providing
access
to
content.
In
the
community
survey,
we
learned
that:
Eight
(8)
out
of
10 patrons
visit
the
Library
to
borrow
physical
materials
(81%).
This
is
by
far
the
leading
reason
people
make
visits.
One
(1)
out
of
5 library
community
respondents
indicated
that
their
primary
connection
to
the
Library
is
by
accessing
its
premium
digital
content
(20%).
The
majority
of
the
non-Overdrive
content
is
funded
through
the
Friends.
The
Library
can
consider
there
to
be
a
distinct
set
of
digital
patrons,
that
is,
individuals
who
primarily
use
the
e-Library.
Considering
that
most
patrons
who
visit
the
library
do
so
to
borrow
physical
materials,
it
is
not
surprising
that
there
is
strong
alignment
in
the
community
around
making
access
to
the
facility
easier.
Over
half
the
respondents
would
like
extended
hours
during
the
weekend
and
a
consistent
schedule
throughout
the
year
(58%).
page
26 307
Slightly
less
than
half
of
the
respondents
expressed
a
desire
for
extended
evening
hours
(44%).
In
general,
a
strength
that
should
be
noted
is
the
high
level
of
awareness
of
and
support
for
library
services
in
Lincoln,
including
through
City
leadership.
Library
service
is
acknowledged
as
a
key
resource
in
the
City’s
2023-2025
Strategic
Plan,
where
Goal
10 states:
“Conduct
an
analysis
of
current
and
future
City
library
service
and
facility
needs…
Staff
to
initiate
an
analysis
of
the
City’s
library
service
and
facility
needs,
which
is
to
include
an
examination
of
the
use
or
repurpose
of
the
Carnegie
Library.”
Opportunities
As
a
concept,
an
opportunity
in
relation
to
the
Library
is
an
identified
community
need
or
desire
that
can
be
met
or
fulfilled
with
Library
programs
and
services.
Community
needs
identified
through
engagement
and
background
research
are
identified
in
the
context
of
the
following
discussion
about
opportunities.
The
primary
opportunity
for
the
Library
is
to
capitalize
on
its
position
as
a
content
provider
to
many
in
the
community
by
extending
service
hours
into
the
evenings
and
on
Saturdays,
in
a
way
that
provides
for
a
consistent
year-round
schedule
of
open
hours.
Extended
service
hours
would
also
enhance
opportunities
for
the
Library
to
foster
community
connections,
in
alignment
with
the
values
reflected
in
the
village
model,
such
as
offering
programs
and
providing
space
for
a
range
of
users.
A
secondary
opportunity
that
can
be
accomplished
by
extending
service
hours
is
to
become
a
bona
fide
community
destination
.
This
secondary
opportunity
is
in
direct
alignment
with
the
village
concept
model
promoted
by
the
City.
Currently,
the
community
survey
indicates
that
just
1 out
of
5 community
members
use
the
Library
to
attend
events
or
to
study,
work,
relax,
meet
friends
and/or
bring
children.
page
27 308
A
basis
for
this
lower
than
desired
level
of
use
is
the
limited
open
hours
the
Library
is
open
to
the
public.
At
an
average
of
36 open
hours
per
week,
the
Library
is
not
viewed
as
available
as
a
community
destination
beyond
the
standard
school
and
work
day.
Current
teen
interns
conducted
interviews
with
their
peers,
and
a
recurrent
theme
that
emerged
from
these
is
that
students
with
after-school
obligations
cannot
get
to
the
Library
during
the
week
because
the
Library
is
closed
by
the
time
the
structured
parts
of
their
school
day
experience
are
done.
What
is
remarkable
here
is
that
the
very
students
who
might
seem
to
have
heightened
access
to
the
Library
because
of
its
campus
location
also
encounter
barriers
to
access
to
the
Library
due
to
its
limited
hours.
A
third
opportunity
is
for
the
Library
to
strengthen
its
position
as
a
community
builder
through
programming
.
The
Library
already
offers
an
appealing
range
of
programs
that
are
in
scope
and
scale
beyond
what
is
reflective
of
its
level
of
staffing.
It
also
has
ample
square
footage
to
support
a
range
of
activities
within
its
Twelve
Bridges
location.
Based
on
community
interest
and
participation
in
the
programming
that
is
offered,
it
is
clear
that
there
is
an
opportunity
to
heighten
the
impact
of
the
Library
by
fortifying
its
staff
and
budget
to
support
more
and
more
varied
programming.
Currently,
the
overall
budget
and
staffing
capacity
limits
access
to
the
space
and
also
constrains
the
timing
and
frequency
of
Library
programming.
When
asked
to
consider
how
to
spend
any
additional
dollars
the
Library
might
receive
for
programming,
community
survey
respondents
indicated
that
they
would
like
to
spend
just
about
3 out
of
five
dollars
on
over
programs
for
youth.
These
programs
would
encompass:
●
Regular
activities
for
children,
such
as
Storytime,
Read
to
a
Dog,
and
Homework
Help;
●
Regular
activities
for
teens,
to
be
developed
with
teen
input;
●
Special
events
for
children,
teens
and
their
families
like
Family
Art
Night
or
Battle
of
the
Books;
●
Programs
that
help
youth
build
reading
and
school
skills.
page
28 309
For
a
community
even
half
the
size
of
Lincoln,
a
baseline
level
for
sustaining
youth
programming
and
engagement
should
be
at
least
one
full-time
credentialed
youth
services
librarian
and
another
full-time
credentialed
school
librarian/media
specialist.
Lincoln
has
neither
of
these
roles
staffed
fully,
and
this
means
that
the
youth
population
in
town
are
under-served
when
it
comes
to
programs
for
youth
and
the
kind
of
academic,
curricular
support
that
is
the
special
purview
of
a
school
librarian/
media
specialist.
As
Lincoln
develops
its
village
model
and
attracts
new
families
with
children,
these
families
will
come
from
other
municipalities
with
expectations
about
baseline
public
library
services.
In
addition
to
collections
and
space,
a
large
part
of
a
healthy
library
ecosystem
in
a
municipality
is
a
robust
profile
of
activities
and
curricular
support
for
children
and
students
of
all
ages.
In
addition
to
programming
for
youth,
there
is
also
interest
in
adult
programming,
notably
creative
or
cultural
experiences
such
as
concerts,
author
visits,
and
art
events.
Survey
respondents
would
like
to
see
2 out
of
every
5 dollars
of
additional
library
program
and
event
funding
to
be
earmarked
for
these
types
of
experiences.
Pursuing
opportunities
that
meet
community
needs
calls
for,
above
all
else,
staffing
the
Library
in
support
of
extending
open
hours.
Extended
open
hours
provide
support
for
the
opportunities
discussed
above.
There
is
also
significant
community
support
for
this.
More
than
half
the
survey
respondents
want
to
see
extended
hours
during
the
weekend,
along
with
a
consistent
year-round
schedule
for
Library
hours
(58%).
Additionally,
2 out
of
5 respondents
indicated
a
desire
for
extended
open
hours
in
the
evenings
(44%).
These
results
all
suggest
that
a
major
opportunity
for
the
Library
to
improve
is
to
extend
service
hours.
It
also
suggests
that
if
the
Library
is
facing
budget
challenges,
preserving
open
hours
should
be
a
main
priority.
page
29 310
Finally,
a
fourth
opportunity
is
for
the
Library
to
strengthen
its
position
as
a
content
provider
by
undertaking
a
collection-wide
audit
of
its
physical
materials,
right-sizing
the
collection
to
match
the
needs
of
the
community.
Given
the
popularity
of
using
the
collection
—
again,
8 out
0f
10 survey
respondents
report
visiting
the
library
for
materials
is
their
top
activity
—
and
the
overall
older
age
of
the
collection,
there
is
an
opportunity
to
refine
the
physical
collection
and
enhance
digital
offerings.
Aspirations
The
clearest
aspiration
for
the
Library
is
to
capitalize
on
its
position
as
a
content
provider
to
many
in
the
community
by
creating
a
long
term
plan
to
extend
access
to
physical
collections
and
shared
community
spaces
in
each
village
.
The
community
survey
indicated
there
to
be
less
interest
in
other
options
for
easing
access
to
borrowing,
such
as
the
expansion
of
Library
Hold
Lockers,
adding
branches
throughout
the
City,
and
providing
pop-up
Library
services
on
a
regular
schedule
or
at
community
events.
Around
1 out
of
4 respondents
indicate
an
interest
in
these
specific
efforts.
In
spite
of
these
survey
outcomes,
access
was
by
far
and
away
the
most
pressing
need
expressed
by
participants
in
direct
community
engagement
opportunities.
A
next
step
for
the
Library
is
to
determine
what
modalities
are
optimal
for
the
community
as
part
of
extending
access
in
every
village.
In
these
engagements,
staff
and
community
members
highlighted
a
desire
for
a
combination
of:
●
mobile
service,
self-service,
and
full-service
options;
●
a
dedicated
outreach
team
with
a
bookmobile
and/or
mobile
service
vehicles
to
bring
access
to
the
collection
and
programming
to
other
areas
of
the
community;
●
an
additional
physical
location,
particularly
in
the
northern
area
of
the
city;
and,
●
a
timeline
for
bringing
Carnegie
back
into
a
service
option,
whether
as
a
self-service
location
or,
to
capitalize
on
its
location
downtown
and
on
the
square,
as
a
space
for
gathering
and
events.
page
30 311
A
re-opening
of
the
Carnegie
Library
with
some
self-service
options
for
collection
access,
complemented
by
a
design
of
spaces
that
make
it
a
bona
fide
community
destination
for
solo
study
or
work
and
for
collaboration
among
community
members
would
provide
a
more
intimate
complement
to
the
expansive
Twelve
Bridges
location.
Over
half
of
the
community
members
surveyed
are
interested
in
a
library
refresh
that
offers:
●
comfortable,
lounge-like
spaces
(66%);
●
spaces
that
promote
focus
and
individual
work
(56%);
and,
●
spaces
to
use/charge
your
own
personal
device.
In
surveying
the
community,
it
is
evident
that
nearly
9 out
of
10 people
tend
to
bring
their
own
computer,
tablet,
or
phone
to
the
Library
if
they
plan
to
spend
time
there.
This
means
that
a
revitalization
of
the
Carnegie
Library
would
not
call
for
a
large
build-out
of
public-access
computer
workstations
but
rather
a
strong
electrical
and
wifi
network
infrastructure
accessible
to
users’
personal
devices.
A
secondary
aspiration
is
to
create
community
awareness
about
library
services
beyond
the
basics.
This
includes
raising
awareness
about
the
existing
library
hours,
which
include
substantial
hours
on
Saturdays,
to
overcome
the
perception
of
a
lack
of
access
on
the
weekend.
Many
community
members
are
familiar
with
core
services
offered
by
any
given
library,
such
as
access
to
book
collections
and
to
technology.
Aligned
with
this,
half
of
community
survey
respondents
indicated
they
are
familiar
with
accessible
library
materials,
such
as
large
materials,
audiobooks,
and
the
digital
library.
Beyond
content
provision,
survey
respondents
are
far
less
familiar
with
Library
services.
About
1 out
of
4 respondents
are
familiar
with:
●
Online
reading
programs
offered
by
the
Library
(26%)
●
Large
community
events,
like
the
Lincoln
Book
Festival
(23%)
page
31 312
Few
residents
are
aware
of
the
24/7
Library
Hold
lockers,
likely
because
this
is
a
very
new
service.
A
sustained
marketing
effort
will
foster
engagement
with
the
Library
for
all
that
it
is
accomplishing
now.
Marketing
will
also
help
current
and
incoming
residents
continue
to
envision
how
the
Library
has
the
potential
to
fulfill
core
community
needs
such
as
building
connections
among
residents
and
creating
shared,
readily
accessible
community
destinations
in
each
village.
Taking
active
steps
from
the
Library
to
promote
its
current
efforts
would
call
for
specific
marketing
expertise
as
part
of
a
staff
role
at
the
Library
and/or
support
from
external
paid
partnership
with
a
vendor.
These
opportunities
and
aspirations
call
upon
City
of
Lincoln
stakeholders
and
leadership
to
review
the
2050
General
Plan’s
agenda
for
Library
Services.
As
the
City
has
proceeded
with
its
ambitious
village
model
vision
for
its
future,
library
services
need
to
be
considered
as
key
components,
alongside
parks,
schools,
and
community
centers.
page
32 313
Paths Forward for the Lincoln Public Library
More
than
15 years
of
declining
investment
in
the
Library,
when
combined
with
existing
community
growth,
planned
annexations
and
expansions,
and
Sierra
College
pulling
out
from
the
joint
use
agreement,
has
placed
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
in
a
precarious
financial
and
service
provision
situation.
There
are
no
good
options
available;
the
City
of
Lincoln
will
either
need
to
take
a
position
that
library
services
are
not
part
of
the
vision
they
have
for
Lincoln’s
future,
which
would
seem
to
be
in
direct
conflict
with
the
“feel”
of
Lincoln
and
commitments
in
the
2050
General
Plan,
or
will
need
to
commit
to
a
long
and
gradual
re-investment
in
library
services.
The
financial
picture
is
further
complicated
by
the
requirements
of
the
grant
from
the
State
of
California
that
support
the
construction
of
the
Twelve
Bridges
location,
which
stipulates
the
facility
must
be
used
as
a
public
library
for
40 years
following
the
grant
award,
until
2047;
otherwise,
the
City
is
responsible
for
paying
back
the
full
$10
million
of
the
grant.
Even
with
the
three
party
joint
use
agreement,
the
City
of
Lincoln
will
be
the
one
required
to
absorb
the
greatest
risk
if
the
facility
cannot
be
used
as
a
public
library.
In
her
February
4,
2025
work
session
with
the
Lincoln
City
Council,
Lincoln
Library
Director
Kathryn
Hunt
highlighted
multiple
potential
major
solutions
to
the
funding
issue
created
by
Sierra
College’s
withdrawal.
Many
of
those
solutions
are
covered
throughout
this
report.
However,
there
are
two
mentioned
in
the
work
session
that
are
not
addressed
here:
●
Closure
of
the
Library
.
If
the
Twelve
Bridges
location
is
closed
as
a
library
before
2057,
the
City
will
have
to
repay
the
State
of
California
the
$10
million
construction
grant
●
Change
in
Governance
—
Privatization
or
joining
the
County
.
Any
change
in
governance
will
result
in
loss
of
local
control,
with
extremely
uncertain
cost
savings
and
service
impacts.
These
are
also
multi-year
processes
requiring
negotiations
with
partners
and
approval
from
the
State.
page
33 314
Options
like
handing
the
Twelve
Bridges
facility
over
to
the
school
district
or
the
library
returning
just
to
offering
service
out
of
the
Carnegie
—
itself
not
a
viable
option,
as
no
work
has
been
done
on
the
2,300
square
foot
facility
to
bring
it
up
to
current
accessibility
standards
—
are
not
possible
due
to
the
stipulations
of
the
construction
funding
and
article
9 of
the
joint
use
Memorandum
of
Understanding
(MOU),
most
notably
stating
that
“[t]he
Agencies
may
only
use
the
Library
as
a
joint
use,
co-located
public
library,
for
the
benefit
of
the
City,
the
College
and
the
School
District,
and
for
no
other
purpose.”
In
painting
a
picture
of
the
options
Lincoln
has
in
this
moment
for
its
library,
there
are
three
that
stand
out
as
realistic
given
the
timeframe:
●
A
loss
in
service:
maintaining
a
single-location
service
point
at
Twelve
Bridges
with
75%
of
the
current
budget.
With
Sierra
College
pulling
out
of
the
joint
use
agreement,
the
library
is
losing
25%
of
its
current
budget,
or
$222,212,
which
will
have
a
dramatic
impact
on
the
services
the
Library
can
provide.
In
this
worst-case
scenario,
services
provided
by
the
Library
must
be
restructured
to
more
adequately
represent
the
investment
by
each
party.
With
the
City
funding
85%
of
the
budget,
as
well
as
holding
the
responsibility
for
maintenance
and
use
of
the
building,
the
hours,
services,
programs,
and
collections
must
be
repositioned
to
ensure
the
significant
majority
of
the
benefit
of
library
services
will
directly
impact
community
users,
as
opposed
to
users
from
the
school.
In
addition,
due
to
the
current
funding
structure,
the
25%
cut
will
mainly
need
to
come
from
staffing,
which
could
represent
a
loss
equivalent
to
3 to
3.5 FTE,
stretching
an
already
thin
level
of
coverage
to
the
breaking
point
and
resulting
in
additional
and
significant
reductions
in
open
hours.
●
The
status
quo:
maintaining
a
single-location
service
point
at
Twelve
Bridges
with
the
current
budget.
For
this
option
to
be
viable
in
the
timeframe
necessary
requires
additional
investment
from
the
school
district,
which
will
need
to
triple
its
current
investment
in
order
to
maintain
the
level
of
service
the
Library
is
currently
providing
to
the
high
school
and
its
students.
Even
with
this
investment,
the
Library
should
make
adjustments
to
its
hours
to
better
meet
the
page
34 315
needs
of
the
community
members
looking
to
use
the
library,
more
adequately
balancing
the
open
hours
to
reflect
the
investment
of
each
party,
and
the
school
district
will
need
to
acknowledge
that
access
every
morning
to
the
library
facility
with
the
current
staffing
level
is
not
a
possibility.
This
need
for
morning
hours
prevents
the
Library
from
more
fully
meeting
the
needs
of
its
greater
community
member
users.
Replacing
the
funding
lost
by
Sierra
College’s
withdrawal
by
finding
a
new
partner
will
not
maintain
Library
service
status
quo
because
that
partner
will
come
with
service
expectations
and
the
need
for
additional
infrastructure
to
manage
the
level
of
investment.
More
on
this
is
covered
in
the
next
option.
●
Adding
a
new
partner
—
and
adding
additional
services.
The
City
wishes
to
see
a
new
partner
come
in
to
replace
Sierra
College,
but
it
must
be
made
clear
that
there
is
no
realistic
opportunity
to
replicate
the
current
joint
use
agreement,
which
provided
a
significant
benefit
in
incoming
funding
from
Sierra
College
without
a
similar
level
of
service
provision,
mainly
due
to
the
college
not
building
the
anticipated
campus.
The
City
will
never
again
be
able
to
find
a
partner
willing
to
contribute
25%
of
the
overall
budget
with
no
discernable
return
of
service/no
additions
to
services
offered.
The
three-party
agreement
was
a
boon
for
Lincoln,
and
now
that
it
will
no
longer
be
in
place,
it
needs
to
be
recognized
that
such
an
agreement
will
not
return.
Any
new
partner
coming
in
with
such
a
substantial
annual
investment
will
expect
to
see
services
that
meet
their
needs
commensurate
with
that
investment;
this
means
even
if
the
City
is
able
to
find
such
a
substantial
partner,
there
will
not
be
an
increase
in
core
access,
hours,
or
service
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
location.
What
is
essential
to
note
is
that,
even
at
its
current
level
of
funding,
and
certainly
before
the
25%
reduction
that
comes
from
Sierra
College
pulling
out
of
the
joint
use
agreement,
the
Library
is
not
able
to
adequately
meet
the
demand
of
either
its
public
or
school
stakeholders
because
it
does
not
have
enough
staff.
This
is
through
no
fault
of
the
staff,
who
work
diligently
to
provide
the
highest
level
of
service
they
can
with
their
constrained
resources.
page
35 316
A Loss in Service: Maintaining a single-location service point
at
Twelve
Bridges
with
75%
of
the
current
budget
Operating
at
75%
of
the
current
budget
will
be
a
devastating
blow
to
library
services
in
Lincoln;
unfortunately,
it
is
also
the
most
likely
path
forward
if
the
City
cannot
acknowledge
the
need
to
rethink
its
approach
to
the
Library’s
budget.
Because
of
the
current
funding
structure,
the
25%
cut
will
need
to
come
almost
entirely
from
staffing,
which
could
represent
a
loss
equivalent
to
3 to
3.5 FTE,
stretching
an
already
thin
level
of
coverage
to
the
breaking
point
and
resulting
in
additional
and
significant
reductions
in
open
hours.
Library
Director
Kathryn
Hunt,
in
her
work
session
presentation
to
Council
on
February
4,
2025,
highlighted
that
the
need
to
operate
at
75%
of
funding
would
require
a
50%
cut
in
staff,
“dissolving
most
seasonal
positions”
and
cutting
or
“dissolving
several
benefitted
positions”
and
a
40%
reduction
in
open
hours.
While
further
minor
savings
would
come
as
a
result
of
these
drastic
staff
and
access
changes,
as
fewer
programs
will
be
offered,
reducing
programming
supplies
and
costs,
fewer
materials
might
be
purchased,
and
some
minor
savings
on
janitorial,
none
of
these
add
up
in
any
significant
way
to
make
up
for
the
disastrous
reductions
needed
that
will
come
from
staffing.
As
significant
decisions
will
have
to
be
made
with
staffing,
hours,
and
the
collection,
as
soon
as
possible
—
even
with
the
bridge
funding
provided
by
the
City
for
the
next
two
years
—
the
Library
should
restructure
its
hours,
deprioritizing
morning
hours
and
shifting
to
evening
access,
and
potentially
closing
additional
days
of
the
week
in
order
to
reallocate
part-time
hours
to
offer
both
morning
and
evening
hours.
In
this
worst-case
scenario,
services
provided
by
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
will
need
to
be
thoroughly
restructured,
and
must
be
done
so
to
more
adequately
represent
the
investment
in
funding
by
each
remaining
party.
This
will
obviously
require
the
MOU
to
be
reopened
and
renegotiated,
and
a
future
MOU
can
have
stronger
language
around
the
responsibility
and
commitment
to
funding
support
and
less
language
around
service
provision
details,
many
of
which
appear
to
be
unenforced
at
this
time.
page
36 317
With
the
City
funding
85%
of
the
budget,
as
well
as
holding
the
responsibility
for
maintenance
and
use
of
the
building,
the
hours,
services,
programs,
and
collections
must
be
repositioned
to
ensure
the
significant
majority
of
the
benefit
of
library
services
will
directly
impact
community
users,
as
opposed
to
users
from
the
school;
school
needs
for
morning
access
are
currently
a
main
driver
of
the
open
hours,
as
evidenced
by
the
change
in
hours
during
the
summer
when
school
is
on
break.
A
40%
reduction
in
open
hours
based
on
the
City
funding
the
majority
of
the
budget
would
render
the
Library’s
open
hours
to
23 hours
per
week.
A
schedule
that
factors
in
the
a
community
desire
for
consistent
open
hours
with
some
evening
and
weekend
access
could
be
modeled
this
way:
DAY
OPEN
HOURS
Monday
Closed
Tuesday
1 –
7 PM
Wednesday
10 –
2 PM
Thursday
1 –
7 PM
Friday
10 –
2 PM
Saturday
9 –
12 PM
Sunday
Closed
This
schedule
also
takes
into
consideration
a
community
desire
to
keep
the
Library
hours
consistent
throughout
the
calendar
year.
Operating
on
75%
of
the
budget
will
make
the
gap
between
the
service
Lincoln
can
actually
provide
and
the
service
it
looks
like
it
should
be
able
to
provide,
as
perceived
by
the
community
through
the
appearance
of
the
Twelve
Bridges
location,
even
wider.
As
seen
above,
library
service
at
3 to
4 FTE
would
have
a
schedule
with
fewer
open
days,
fewer
open
hours,
very
limited
programming,
and
no
outreach
activities.
Filling
in
the
gaps
represented
by
these
enormous
staffing
costs
is
virtually
an
impossibility.
With
over
7,500
volunteer
hours
in
FY23,
Lincoln
is
already
outpacing
the
average
of
its
neighboring
peers
(Placer
County,
Loomis,
Roseville,
and
Folsom)
by
919%.
Those
volunteers
also
give
of
their
time
at
what
is
already
a
significant
pace,
with
Lincoln’s
168
volunteers
donating
their
time
at
a
level
three
times
higher
than
their
page
37 318
next
highest
neighboring
peer,
Folsom,
whose
136
volunteers
give
just
over
2,500
hours.
While
volunteer
efforts
can
substantially
enhance
the
connection
of
the
Library
to
its
community,
they
do
not
replace
the
impact
of
credentialed,
paid
staff
.
With
the
looming
cut
to
the
Library
budget,
there
will
not
be
enough
staff
capacity
to
coordinate
more
volunteer
efforts
than
those
are
already
given.
page
38 319
The status quo: maintaining a single-location service point
at
Twelve
Bridges
with
the
current
budget
For
this
option
to
be
viable
in
the
timeframe
necessary
requires
additional
investment
from
the
school
district,
which
will
need
to
triple
its
current
investment,
from
15%
to
45%,
in
order
to
maintain
the
level
of
service
the
Library
is
currently
providing
to
the
high
school
and
its
students.
While
the
City
has
pledged
the
bridge
support
would
be
the
best
time
to
implement
a
stepped
process
towards
a
more
equitable
investment.
Even
with
the
school
adding
additional
financial
support,
the
Library
should
make
adjustments
to
its
hours
to
better
meet
the
needs
of
the
community
members
looking
to
use
the
library,
more
adequately
balancing
the
open
hours,
and
the
school
district
will
need
to
acknowledge
that
access
every
morning
to
the
library
facility
with
the
current
staffing
level
is
not
a
possibility.
This
need
for
morning
hours
prevents
the
Library
from
more
fully
meeting
the
needs
of
its
greater
community
member
users.
As
with
the
previous
option,
a
more
balanced
schedule
in
terms
of
hours
of
access
would
look
more
like
the
variable
summer
schedule
than
the
current
“regular”
schedule,
with
service
generally
available
two
mornings
at
9am
and
evening
hours
available
two
evenings
until
7pm
while
potentially
retaining
the
full
9am
to
5pm
Saturday
schedule.
If
the
school
needs
access
to
additional
mornings
during
the
week,
it
will
need
to
fund
additional
School
Librarian
Technicians
and
task
the
Technicians
with
monitoring
morning
hours.
In
its
current
state,
the
Library
has
additional
staffing
challenges
beyond
the
hours
of
access:
in
the
last
year,
there
has
been
a
100%
turnover
in
part-time
staff
working
under
20 hours.
Part-time
staff
are
critical
to
ensuring
a
variety
of
library
hours
can
be
offered,
and
each
staff
member
represents
an
investment
in
training,
confidence,
and
expertise
that
is
lost
when
they
need
to
be
replaced.
The
Memorandum
of
Understanding
(MOU)
will
need
to
be
reopened
and
revised
regardless
of
next
steps
.
Both
parties
should
take
the
opportunity
to
ensure
the
revised
document
more
clearly
outlines
funding
responsibilities
and
the
benefits
accorded
by
the
level
of
investment
and
maintains
specifics
only
if
those
specifics
will
page
39 320
be
enforced.
At
the
time
of
the
original
MOU’s
development,
the
following
was,
through
that
document,
assured
to
be
true
and
to
remain
funded:
●
From
Article
15,
Element
2,
Section
15.1:
that
a
set
of
Library
Minimum
Service
Standards
would
be
maintained,
set
out
in
a
high
level
of
detail
in
Exhibit
B,
including
recommendations
for
hours,
number
of
seats,
number
of
computers,
staff
work
space
square
footage,
and
more.
●
From
Article
15,
Element
2,
Section
15.2:
that
any
of
the
three
agencies
could
“provide
additional
library
services
at
the
Library,
at
their
own
cost,
and
subject
to
approval
by
the
Lincoln
City
Council,
which
approval
shall
not
be
unreasonably
withheld”
●
From
Article
15,
Element
2,
Section
15.4:
that
“[t]he
Library
will
employ
a
Library
Media
Teacher
holding
a
valid
credential
authorizing
services
as
a
librarian
issued
by
the
State
Board
of
Education
or
Commission
for
Teacher
Preparation
and
Licensing.”
●
From
From
Article
16,
Element
3,
that
“the
Library
will
be
open
for
the
public
for
not
less
than
64-1/2
hours
per
week
as
follows:
Monday
through
Thursday
7:30
a.m.
to
8:00
p.m.;
Friday
7:30
a.m.
to
5:00
p.m.;
Saturday
12:00
noon
to
5:00
p.m.”
In
the
Library
Plan
of
Service,
there
is
the
commitment
to
having
at
least
60 hours
of
service
per
week
and
supporting
increased
hours
during
exams,
when
needed.
At
the
time
of
this
report,
despite
the
MOU
not
having
been
reopened
or
renegotiated,
these
elements
are
not
in
effect
and
seem
to
be
not
in
effect
without
penalty,
undermining
the
value
of
the
MOU
as
a
whole.
The
2003
Library
Plan
of
Service
prepared
by
Stockton
Associates
also
included
several
factors
in
developing
the
plan
of
service
referred
to
in
Exhibit
B
of
the
MOU
that
have
changed:
●
“The
downtown
Carnegie
Library
will
continue
to
serve
the
community
as
a
library
with
a
change
in
focus
and
scope.
Together,
the
two
libraries
will
provide
much
needed
public
library
services
to
the
Lincoln
community.”
●
“In
order
to
build
the
new
library
and
to
operate
it
effectively,
the
library
will
need
a
dedicated
and
well-qualified
staff.
For
the
first
full
year
of
operation,
the
page
40 321
partnering
agencies
have
agreed
to
support
the
equivalent
of…
8.8 FTE.”
The
specific
positions
are
listed
to
develop
that
8.8 FTE
figure.
●
“Library
Technical
Services
support
for
acquisitions
and
cataloging
will
be
provided
through
an
agreement
with
Sierra
College,”
which
would
further
free
up
the
8.8 FTE
of
staff
for
direct
public
service,
programming,
and
outreach.
Furthermore,
the
Community
Library
Needs
Assessment
lays
out
some
rather
prescient
statements
for
the
future
on
pages
4-7
and
4-8:
The
service
population
for
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
is
expected
to
grow
phenomenally
over
the
next
20 years.
In
the
20 years
previous
to
2000,
the
city
grew
over
171%.
In
the
next
20 years,
it
is
expected
to
grow
over
405%
over
its
2000
population,
to
56,575
residents.
Much
of
the
future
growth
will
occur
between
2000
and
2010.
If
growth
is
to
be
a
positive
influence
on
the
city,
city
infrastructure
and
services
must
be
planned
to
support
the
growth
and
yet
maintain
the
town
atmosphere
the
city's
residents
want
to
keep.
The
city
completed
a
revision
of
its
Strategic
Plan
in
2002
that
addresses
these
issues.
What
is
essential
to
remember
is
that
funding
the
status
quo
is
realistically
a
commitment
to
a
gradual,
continuous
erosion
of
services.
In
order
to
maintain
the
current
level
of
library
service
—
as
incomplete
as
it
is
in
meeting
the
varied
needs
of
the
student
population
and
community
members
—
requires
the
library’s
already
thin
budget
to
grow
at
the
pace
of
inflation
and
of
Lincoln’s
population
growth.
Replacing
the
funding
lost
by
Sierra
College’s
withdrawal
by
finding
a
new
partner
will
not
maintain
a
service
status
quo
because
that
partner
will
come
with
service
expectations
and
the
need
for
additional
infrastructure
to
manage
the
level
of
investment.
Challenges
to
this
approach
are
discussed
in
the
next
section.
page
41 322
Adding a new partner — and adding additional services
The
City
has
been
clear
in
its
desire
to
see
a
new
partner
come
in
to
replace
Sierra
College,
but
it
must
be
made
clear
that
there
is
no
realistic
opportunity
to
replicate
the
current
joint
use
agreement.
The
current
agreement,
because
Sierra
College
did
not
build
its
anticipated
campus,
provided
a
significant
benefit
in
incoming
funding
without
a
similar
level
of
service
provision.
The
City
will
never
again
be
able
to
find
a
partner
willing
to
contribute
25%
of
the
overall
budget
with
no
discernable
return
of
service
or
no
additions
to
services
offered.
All
involved
must
recognize
the
current
joint
use
agreement
offered
some
significant
benefits
for
the
City
and
for
the
City’s
investment
in
the
Library’s
budget,
as
any
new
partner
coming
in
with
such
a
substantial
annual
investment
will
expect
to
see
services
that
meet
their
needs
commensurate
with
that
investment;
this
means
even
if
the
City
is
able
to
find
such
a
substantial
partner,
there
will
not
be
an
increase
in
access,
hours,
or
service
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
location.
The
same
issue
of
diminishing
returns
from
the
previous
option
remains,
even
with
a
new
partner,
if
the
City
and
school
district
do
not
step
up
their
investments.
When
looking
for
a
partner
who
could
participate
at
a
level
similar
to
Sierra
College,
there
are
few
options
in
Lincoln
that
can
meet
this
need;
the
United
Auburn
Indian
Community
(UAIC)
is
likely
the
most
notable.
The
Lincoln
Public
Library
also
does
not
have
the
staffing
levels
necessary
to
develop
the
kind
of
authentic
partnership
such
a
large
amount
of
money
requires
—
fundraising
and
partner
management
at
this
level
would
require
a
staff
member
dedicated
to
finding
and
then
maintaining
that
funding,
and
Library
Director
Kathryn
Hunt,
who
has
to
be
part
of
the
FTE
providing
direct
service,
is
not
able
to
add
such
a
substantial
project
or
commitment.
page
42 323
Funding
this
budget
gap
through
a
patchwork
of
small
business
support
or
contributions
and/or
grants
is
even
less
realistic,
as
those
funds
will
require
an
even
more
substantial
investment
of
staff
time
to
maintain,
collect,
and
deliver
on
the
funds
and
the
promises
that
come
with
those
many
competing
audiences
and
needs.
When
talking
about
partnership
at
such
a
high
level,
the
following
needs
to
be
considered:
●
The
partnership
will
come
with
new
service
expectations,
as
funders
will
expect
to
see
a
return
on
their
investment;
●
The
partnership
will
require
coordination
of
different,
and
potentially
competing,
partnership
goals,
as
is
already
evident
in
the
issues
around
the
Library’s
service
hours;
●
There
is
labor
necessary
to
manage
the
partnership,
the
service
expectations,
the
volunteers,
the
funding,
the
reporting,
etc;
●
High-level,
high-value,
authentic
partnership
development
generally
needs
at
least
an
18 to
24 month
lead
time
to
develop
the
partnership
—
staff
time
and
calendar
time;
●
The
Library
Director
cannot
help
run
the
library
if
she
is
going
to
have
to
create
or
manage
the
partnership,
nor
if
she
needs
to
undertake
the
landscape
analysis
and
needs
assessment
necessary
to
approach
the
right
partner,
if
they
exist;
●
Even
a
short-term
infusion
of
cash
through
partnership
requires
staff
and
calendar
time.
●
Partnership
at
this
level
requires
staff
dedicated
to
maintaining
and
reporting
on
that
partnership
—
as
does
any
move
that
requires
a
significant
number
of
volunteers.
As
mentioned
in
earlier
sections,
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
is
already
operating
with
a
higher
investment
of
volunteer
time
than
its
peers
and
county
neighbors,
and
with
the
well-established
trends
in
less
time
investment
in
social
and
fraternal
organizations
such
as
the
Rotary,
Kiwanis,
etc,
in
overall
community
volunteering
on
a
regular,
scheduled
basis,
and
in
the
increasing
age
of
those
who
volunteer,
any
increase
in
volunteerism
to
support
the
library
is
a
short-term
and
labor-intensive
exercise
at
best.
page
43 324
One
last
element
makes
this
option
a
less
attractive
option:
resource
allocation
for
this
project
would
need
to
start
now
if
there
is
the
hope
to
be
at
a
place
in
two
years,
when
the
City’s
current
bridge
funding
commitment
ends.
That
means,
effectively,
the
Library
will
have
to
operate
at
the
75%
level
until
that
partnership
is
built
up,
and,
without
an
increase
from
the
City
and
the
school
district
to
avoid
further
erosion
of
service,
the
gap
to
fund
is
actually
more
substantial
than
the
25%
amount.
page
44 325
A Funded Model
Any
option
that
responds
to
the
expressed
community
needs
and
incorporates
the
opportunities
the
community
wants
to
see
requires
significant
additional
investment.
This
level
of
investment
represents
the
true
cost
of
services
in
alignment
with
expressed
City
values
and
community
expectations,
and
planning
would
need
to
start
immediately
so
the
first
steps
towards
this
level
of
investment
can
be
incorporated
into
the
next
fiscal
year’s
budget.
If
the
City
is
not
willing
to
start
this
investment,
then
it
must
be
acknowledged
that
Lincoln
is
not
planning
on
offering
library
services
beyond
what
is
currently
available.
This
is
a
truth
that
would
be
very
difficult
for
the
community
to
accept,
and
will
likely
impact
the
impression
new
and
potential
community
members
have
of
Lincoln
as
they
look
to
move
into
new
developments.
Library
service
is
seen
as
a
public
good,
and
there
is
a
great
deal
of
anecdotal
evidence
that
social
infrastructure
services
funded
by
local
government,
such
as
parks,
community
centers
and
other
facilities,
and
libraries,
are
important
to
attracting
the
high
wage
earners
and
young
families
who
will
be
looking
for
and
who
can
afford
the
low
and
medium
density
housing
that
makes
up
the
overwhelming
majority
of
units
being
built
in
the
village
models.
Those
new
residents
are
likely
coming
from
areas
with
established
and
well-funded
library
services,
and
will
likely
expect
a
similar
level
of
service
to
compliment
the
reasons
many
may
be
moving
to
Lincoln
—
for
the
small
town
feel.
The
current
Twelve
Bridges
facility
is
a
true
community
resource,
and
a
facility
to
rightly
be
proud
of.
At
40,000
square
feet,
it
is
large
enough
that
it
could
potentially
support
the
use
of
a
community
of
100,000
people
—
but
not
in
its
current
location,
geographically
isolated
from
downtown,
and
not
with
its
current
level
of
staffing.
The
vision
of
the
Lincoln
community
is
one
of
an
integration
of
recreation,
community
services,
and
more,
and
the
reality
is
that
the
current
decision
is
not
to
integrate
library
services
into
the
village
concept.
If
the
City
cannot
sustain
services
for
the
population
it
has
right
now,
it
will
not
be
able
to
offer
library
services
to
its
new
residents,
either.
page
45 326
The
City
should
implement
a
multi-year
plan
to
work
towards
funding
at
the
average
aggregate
of
the
county
as
a
minimum
—
the
$35.20
per
capita
mentioned
on
page
24. At
current
population
levels,
that
budget
would
be
double,
at
$1,862,412.
However,
this
figure
will
need
to
grow
as
population
increases
over
the
course
of
the
plan
to
align
spending.
A
model
of
a
multi-year
plan
assuming
a
static
population
of
52,000
people
is
below.
This
is
a
pathway
that
would
just
put
the
Library
on
nearly
the
same
playing
field
as
the
County.
In
effect,
it
can
be
considered
a
corrective
action
for
funding
for
the
current
population
to
bring
it
in
alignment
with
the
County
aggregate.
If
the
City
had
been
able
to
maintain
the
status
quo
of
the
plan
it
expressed
in
2008,
the
current
budget
would
be
approximately
$2,242,422,
or
$42.95
per
capita.
This
substantial
investment
would
only
just
bring
Lincoln’s
spending
above
Placer
County’s,
and
only
just
bring
Lincoln
above
the
median
spending
for
the
state.
The
increase
each
year
would
in
effect
be
on
average
23%.
In
the
2025-2026,
the
percentage
is
higher
to
factor
in
the
funding
lost
from
Sierra
College.
In
subsequent
years,
the
percentages
provide
a
consistent
pattern
for
increases
that
also
consider
a
conservative
Consumer
Price
Index
Inflation
for
2025
of
2%
as
a
guidepost.
page
46 Fiscal
Year
Budget
Amount
Increase
Per
Capita
for
52,000
population
2024-25
$937,422
Current
budget
$18.03
2025-26
$1,190,526
27%
$22.89
2026-27
$1,452,442
22%
$27.93
2027-28
$1,771,979
22%
$34.08
2028-29
$2,161,814
22%
$41.57
327
Again,
this
major
need
for
additional
investment
would
only
bring
Lincoln
in
line
with
a
County-funded
system
that
is
seen
by
many
Lincoln
stakeholders
as
inferior.
Quantitatively,
this
level
of
investment
would
bring
Lincoln
just
barely
into
the
top
50%
of
funding
per
capita
when
using
the
State’s
public
library
funding
statistics
as
a
method
for
benchmarking.
This
model
is
a
demonstration
of
how
far
funding
for
library
services
in
Lincoln
have
been
allowed
to
fall.
The
2008
General
Plan
estimates
a
population
of
130,000
or
more
by
2050,
and
that
is
only
25 years
away
—
even
if
there
is
no
per
capita
increase
in
funding,
at
the
2025
per
capita
level
of
funding,
$18.03,
that
requires
a
budget
of
$2,343,900
for
130,000
people.
The
City
needs
to
be
continually
investing
just
to
keep
pace.
page
47 328
Future Considerations for Library Service
When
gathered
through
multiple
modes
of
community
engagement,
the
aspirations
of
the
community
are
clear:
community
members
are
proud
of
their
library,
and
want
more
access
.
The
community
needs
and
aspirations
Lincoln
needs
to
keep
in
mind
to
support
future
planning
are
really
that
simple
—
though,
as
this
report
has
shown,
will
not
be
simple
to
achieve
or
to
fund.
Increased
Hours
Most
immediately,
the
City
should
explore
ways
to
support
what
can
at
least
be
perceived
as
additional
hours
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
location.
The
current
hours
were
determined
via
historic
use
patterns
and
a
community
survey,
but
the
reality
of
the
interest
in
and
need
for
library
hours
means
it
will
be
difficult
to
find
a
schedule
via
consensus.
Students,
even
among
themselves,
have
competing
needs:
they
need
access
during
school
hours
and
free
periods,
which
include
early
morning
hours,
and
want
access
to
the
library
for
homework
and
gathering
opportunities
after
their
afterschool
activities
are
completed
—
so
after
5pm
—
as
well
as
on
weekends.
The
morning
needs
of
the
school
compete
with
the
evening
and
weekend
needs
of
the
community.
Recommendations
in
this
consideration
include:
●
The
City
should
try
to
avoid
options
that
result
in
a
reduction
of
hours,
preserving
the
current
average
of
36 hours
of
access
a
week
as
a
minimum.
●
Moving
away
from
the
current
schedule
where
the
Library
has
consistent
hours
and
implementing
a
schedule
with
some
morning
and
some
evening
hours.
Access
via
hours
should
be
prioritized
in
accordance
with
the
investment
allocations.
●
Undertaking
a
plan
for
investment,
including
in
partnership
with
the
school
district
that
focuses
on
their
investment
in
staffing
to
support
library
access,
that
would
result
in
additional
hours
of
access
at
the
Twelve
Bridges
location.
page
48 329
Exploring
Different
Modes
of
Access
Just
about
one
in
four
survey
respondents
favored
options
for
easing
access
to
borrowing,
such
as
the
expansion
of
Library
Hold
Lockers,
adding
branches
throughout
the
City,
or
providing
pop-up
Library
services
on
a
regular
schedule
or
at
community
events.
Nevertheless,
easing
and
increasing
access
was
the
top
concern
in
community
and
stakeholder
engagement,
emerging
as
a
top
priority
for
the
Board
and
staff.
This
means
that
options
distinct
from
those
cited
in
the
survey
need
to
be
explored.
Particularly
through
the
design
thinking
based
engagement
opportunities,
when
participants
were
asked
to
work
with
one
another
to
better
understand
their
needs
for
library
service
as
community
members
and
then
propose
solutions,
no
matter
how
ambitious,
alternative
forms
of
access
were
by
far
the
most
prevalent
solution.
The
ideas
included:
●
Supported
transportation
for
community
members
to
get
to
the
library;
the
need
for
better
public
transportation
to
the
library
was
also
expressed
in
the
survey
and
through
other
community
engagement;
●
Additional
book
lockers,
including
at
grocery
stores
or
gas
stations,
prioritizing
their
locations
for
ease
of
community
access;
●
Service
engagement
with
retirement
communities;
●
Re-engaging
the
Carnegie
location
as
an
event
hub,
even
if
the
facility
itself
was
only
used
for
storage
and
the
events
took
place
on
the
plaza
out
front;
●
Equipment,
including
small
vans
or
other
vehicles,
to
support
pop-up
library
service
provision
around
the
community,
which
might
include
retirement
communities,
in
village
commercial
centers
as
they
develop,
and
in
parks;
●
A
bookmobile.
All
of
these
service
ideas
are
programs
used
by
libraries
across
the
country,
so
as
Lincoln
sought
to
research
or
implement
any
of
these
ideas,
the
Library
would
be
able
to
learn
from
the
knowledge
and
experience
of
peers.
page
49 330
Recommendations
in
this
consideration
include:
●
Improve
signage
for
the
Twelve
Bridges
location,
so
community
members
know
there
is
indeed
a
public
library
there.
While
this
doesn’t
increase
access,
it
does
increase
the
perception
of
access.
●
Additional
book
lockers
and
funding
for
a
bookmobile
are
the
kind
of
projects
that
can
gather
significant
fundraising
support,
and
it
is
a
more
realistic
approach
to
direct
community-based
fundraising
towards
these
tangible
options
that
expand
the
definitions
of
library
service.
Starting
a
fundraising
campaign
for
what
is
needed
to
expand
at
least
the
perception
of
additional
access
in
the
immediate
future
would
take
advantage
of
the
interest
the
community
has
in
supporting
the
Library.
●
Place
a
book
locker
or
a
library
collection
vending
machine
on
the
plaza
in
proximity
to
the
Carnegie
to
take
a
first
step
in
returning
library
service
to
the
downtown.
●
Use
the
resources
available
within
other
City
departments
to
explore
the
feasibility
of
using
the
Carnegie
as
some
kind
of
community-focused
space
with
a
library
presence.
An
important
factor
to
note
is
that
even
with
unstaffed
models
like
book
lockers
or
a
book
vending
machine,
there
is
a
staffing
requirement
to
service
them.
Depending
on
the
number
of
unstaffed
locations
and
the
distance
between
them,
the
level
of
use
of
the
unstaffed
options,
and
the
materials
movement
necessary
to
support
their
use,
the
Library
would
likely
need
20 to
40 hours
a
week
for
service,
or
.5
to
1 FTE.
Ensuring
Library
Service
is
Incorporated
in
the
Village
Model
As
new
villages
come
online,
the
City
does
need
to
make
a
commitment
to
some
kind
of
library
presence,
whether
it
is
additional
book
locker
pick
up
options,
bookmobile
stops,
small
self-service
locations
like
King
County
Library
System’s
(KCLS)
Redmond
Ridge
Express
,
or
a
small
staffed
branch.
This
would
be
in
alignment
with
the
vision
of
Lincoln
that
the
City
is
communicating
through
their
various
village
and
annexation
plans
—
walkable,
neighborhood
oriented
areas
of
the
community,
where
community
members,
especially
as
Lincoln
(and
its
page
50 331
traffic)
grows,
will
not
have
to
drive
to
distant
areas
of
the
community
to
access
services.
Moving
around
a
city
of
100,000
or
140,000
is
very
different
from
moving
around
a
city
of
50,000
—
traffic
and
access
will
only
grow
as
an
issue,
even
if
only
as
a
perceived
issue.
This
option
likely
includes
a
re-look
at
how
Public
Facilities
Elements
(PFE)
fees
are
collected
and
their
expectation
for
use.
As
each
new
development
brings
these
fees
to
the
municipality,
they
should
be
designed
at
a
level
to
support
the
development
of
town
infrastructure
in
response
to
increased
demand
on
municipal
services.
Currently,
the
Library
uses
PFEs
in
alignment
with
the
constraint
that
they
be
used
for
capital
funding,
using
the
fees
to
support
the
collection,
since
books
qualify
as
a
capital
expenditure.
However,
this
places
a
core
library
service
—
and
the
service
most
mentioned
across
engagement
efforts
—
subject
to
the
variables
of
these
fees
and,
along
with
the
substantial
investment
in
the
collection
from
the
Friends
of
the
Lincoln
Library,
hides
the
level
to
which
both
the
City
and
the
school
district
are
underfunding
the
collection.
Recommendations
in
this
consideration
include:
●
Incorporating
the
full
costs
of
supporting
the
Library
collection
annually
into
the
budget
supported
through
the
joint
use
agreement,
which
means
additional
investment
from
both
the
City
and
school
district.
●
At
minimum,
clarify
the
expectations
for
what
PFEs
are
intended
to
fund,
and
explore
ways
they
could
be
collected
and/or
saved
to
ensure
money
is
available
for
a
library
presence
in
each
village.
More
information
on
this
is
in
the
following
section,
“Notes
on
Developing
the
Paths
Forward.”
●
Engage
a
community
group
that
includes
library
and
city
staff
to
research
potential
modes
of
library
access
for
the
villages.
●
Consider
how
the
City
and
school
district
can
extend
the
kind
of
cooperation
that
exists
in
the
Twelve
Bridges
location
to
other
school
facilities
already
planned
for
the
village
annexations.
page
51 332
Supporting
the
Library
Financially
The
exploration
or
development
of
alternative
funding
options
or
methods
was
beyond
the
scope
of
this
project,
but
it
is
clear
that
the
City
needs
to
explore
alternative
methods
for
ensuring
consistent
financial
support
at
the
level
needed
by
the
community.
Recommendations
in
this
consideration
include:
●
Ensuring
the
City
and
school
district
fully
support
the
ongoing,
annual,
core
services
of
the
Library.
This
would
allow
community
fundraising,
partnership
agreements,
and
the
support
of
the
Friends
of
Lincoln
Library
to
be
directed
towards
non-core
service
expansions,
pilot
projects,
and
one-time
costs,
so
that
the
Library
is
less
vulnerable
to
changing
funding
or
support.
●
Exploring
a
new
approach
to
the
use
of
PFE
funds.
●
Investigating
a
tax
measure
to
increase
general
fund
revenue.
●
As
suggested
in
Library
Director
Kathryn
Hunt’s
February
work
session
with
Council,
investigating
whether
there
is
potential
funding
from
the
County
for
County
patrons
using
library
services
in
Lincoln.
page
52 333
Notes on Developing the Paths Forward
In
the
case
of
the
Lincoln
Public
Library,
there
appears
to
be
broad
support
for
the
Library,
its
services,
and
its
importance
to
the
community
from
its
stakeholders,
including
City
leadership
and
City
Council.
While
this
is
an
excellent
place
to
start,
as
the
potential
paths
forward
highlighted
in
the
last
section
demonstrate,
that
support
needs
to
be
backed
by
tangible
financial
investment,
particularly
for
staffing.
The
findings
of
this
report
provide
an
analysis
built
on
the
information
we
as
consultants
were
able
to
obtain
and
observe;
as
with
any
community-focused
engagement
process,
there
will
be
community
members
whose
experiences
and
backgrounds
are
not
as
well-represented
as
they
might
be,
and
perspectives
on
the
library
and
its
future
that
are
not
reflected.
We
offer
these
following
observations
as
points
of
interest
—
while
their
presence
does
not
change
the
recommendations
we
have
made
for
the
paths
forward,
it
is
important
the
City
note
these
gaps.
The
Need
to
Strengthen
Stakeholder
Relationships
The
Lincoln
community
seems
open
and
willing
to
engage
with
the
Library
and
offer
its
support,
but
that
support
may
be
limited
to
a
more
shallow
or
transactional
relationship.
Deeper
or
potentially
more
meaningful
engagement
was
more
challenging,
even
when
directly
engaging
with
community
members
that
fit
the
survey
profile.
This
does
not
bode
well
for
the
kind
of
sustained
engagement
and
advocacy
on
the
part
of
Library
stakeholders
and
the
community
that
will
be
necessary
to
ensure
access
to
library
services.
For
example,
while
the
Library
put
together
a
strong
team
of
advocates
and
stakeholders,
the
Project
Planning
Team
was
hobbled
due
to
team
members
unable
to
make
meetings
and
team
members
not
fully
participating
in
community
engagement
work,
such
as
interviews
with
community
members
and
stakeholders.
In
another
example,
over
the
course
of
the
project,
the
Library
offered
multiple
opportunities
for
the
community
to
engage
through
a
variety
of
methods,
but
did
not
have
attendance
at
virtual
sessions
or
opportunities
held
in
the
evening.
Regardless
of
which
option
the
Library
or
City
chooses
to
move
forward,
there
will
need
to
be
substantial
work
on
the
part
of
advocates
and
stakeholders
to
connect
with
page
53 334
community
members,
city
leadership,
and
potential
partners
in
the
community.
This
will
be
especially
crucial
if
the
Library
is
expected
to
move
forward
in
obtaining
operating
funds
through
partnerships.
Ensuring
Diverse
Perspectives
Constructive
Disruption
consultants
worked
with
Library
staff
and
the
Project
Planning
Team
to
identify
ways
to
reach
out
to
Lincoln’s
diverse
communities
as
part
of
this
study.
For
example,
the
Project
Planning
Team
participated
in
a
community
mapping
exercise,
which
is
a
tool
used
to
bring
to
the
forefront
community
groups
and
community
perspectives
unlikely
to
be
represented
in
a
broad
call
for
engagement,
ensuring
a
project
has
the
opportunity
to
learn
from
the
experiences
of
a
more
diverse
cross-section
of
the
community.
However,
as
noted
above,
the
Project
Planning
Team
was
not
able
to
complete
their
outreach
to
the
community
groups
and
members
they
identified,
leaving
notable
gaps
in
representation.
Some
of
this
was
mitigated
by
the
teen
interns
undertaking
some
interviews,
and
by
engaging
with
young
people
through
the
Read
Across
Lincoln
program,
incorporating
input
from
students
across
the
community.
The
City
and
the
Library
also,
in
some
cases,
did
not
feel
they
had
a
strong
enough
relationship
with
key
groups
to
reach
out
as
part
of
the
engagement
process,
with
the
United
Auburn
Indian
Community
as
a
notable
example.
In
addition,
the
survey,
which
could
be
taken
electronically
and
anonymously
and
took
5 minutes
or
less
to
complete,
had
a
large,
generally
homogeneous
set
of
respondents.
1,847
community
members
shared
their
thoughts.
page
54 335
Survey
participation
by
race
is
reflective
of
the
general
population
of
white
people.
However,
survey
participation
by
ethnicity
was
not.
The
American
Indian
and
Black/African
American
communities
in
Lincoln
are
small,
yet
they
are
significantly
under-represented.
The
Latino
community
makes
up
19%
of
the
City
of
Lincoln
population
according
to
the
U.S.
Census
American
Community
Survey
(2024).
That’s
nearly
1 out
of
5 residents.
Just
9%
of
the
Latino
population
participated
in
the
survey.
This
indicates
that
there
is
significant
under-representation
from
this
large
segment
of
the
population.
The
Library
must
invest
in
cultivating
strong,
mutually
beneficial
relationships
with
community
groups
and
members
outside
of
those
traditionally
represented
by
the
profile
of
the
survey
respondents
or
who
are
traditionally
part
of
planning
processes.
This
would
ensure,
in
times
of
crisis,
those
relationships
are
already
strong
and
are
not
and
would
not
be
perceived
as
extractive.
Using
the
Public
Facilities
Elements
(PFE)
Fees
to
Support
Access
Exploring
the
opportunity
for
alternate
uses
for
the
PFE
fees
are
beyond
the
scope
of
this
study,
but
there
is
a
strong
sense
that
the
PFEs
should
be
reallocated
to
truly
support
capital
needs
beyond
those
in
the
collection.
Ongoing
costs
for
the
library
collection,
as
a
core
service,
and
the
most
accessed
service,
should
be
incorporated
fully
into
the
municipal
budget
and
should
not
rely
upon
PFEs
or
support
for
the
Friends.
In
exploring
future
models,
we
believe
the
City
needs
to
pick
up
the
collection
costs
so
PFE
fees
can
go
for
their
true
intention:
providing
funds
to
broaden
library
access
across
the
city.
The
City
may
need
to
charge
more
if
the
funds
are
intended
to
help
capital
costs
of
new
facilities
in
the
village
model,
as
estimates
show
the
funds
collected
are
not
enough
to
fund
a
branch.
Even
if
the
PFEs
cannot
be
used
to
support
additional
truly
capital
expenses
like
a
small
branch
in
each
village,
taxes
will
eventually
burst
upwards
and
a
new
gap
will
open
in
the
Library’s
budget
when,
down
the
road,
the
PFEs
invariably
sunset.
page
55 336
Methodology and Resources
The
Constructive
Disruption
team,
in
concert
with
library
leadership
and
the
project
planning
team,
applied
multiple
data
collection
methods
during
the
planning
process.
The
project
planning
team
was
comprised
of
the
following
members:
○
Carol
Judd,
Lincoln
community
member
○
Celina
Salas,
Latino
Leadership
Council
○
Erin
Frye,
City
of
Lincoln
○
Gloria
Irey,
Library
Advisory
Board
○
Heather
Pierce,
WPUSD,
Library
Advisory
Committee
○
Karen
Lindh,
Friends
of
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
○
Karen
Van
Gundy,
Lincoln
Public
Library
staff
member
○
Kathryn
Hunt,
Lincoln
Public
Library
Director
○
Linda
Derosier,
Friends
of
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
○
Lynne
Snyder,
Library
Advisory
Board
○
Paul
Radcliffe,
Rotary
International
○
Rene
McGrath,
Lincoln
community
member
○
Richard
Pearl,
City
Councilmember
○
Samuel
Schlafer,
Lincoln
Public
Library
staff
member
The
methods
included
background
research,
a
community
survey,
external
and
internal
focus
groups,
various
virtual
and
in-person
community-focused
sessions,
and
stakeholder
interviews.
These
multiple
methods
and
their
respective
analytic
components
provided
for
a
triangulation
of
data,
in
support
of
the
development
of
a
robust
and
reliable
foundation
for
a
community
needs
assessment
and
conceptualization
of
a
modern
public
library.
Survey
The
design
of
the
survey
questions
provided
an
opportunity
for
individuals
to
rank
priorities
and
express
ideas
as
they
relate
to:
the
Library
as
a
community
space;
the
library
as
a
community
builder
through
its
public
programming;
and,
the
library
as
a
content
provider.
page
56 337
The
survey
provides
a
set
of
quantitatively
based
insights
about
how
people
see
themselves
using
library
spaces,
participating
in
library
programs
and
activities,
and
borrowing
content
from
the
library.
This
information
supports
a
data-based
approach
to
decision-making
about
library
facilities.
It
also
complements
the
information
and
insights
gathered
through
the
focus
groups
and
the
stakeholder
interviews.
External
Focus
Groups
and
Stakeholder
Interviews:
Participant
selection
The
participants
in
external
focus
groups
were
identified
using
community
mapping,
a
process
that
draws
upon
an
organization’s
internal
expertise
to
identify
stakeholders
across
an
entire
community.
The
project
planning
team
mapped
Lincoln,
and
this
provided
the
basis
for
outreach
for
focus
group
and
stakeholder
interviews.
By
its
very
nature,
this
approach
supports
diversity
and
inclusion,
so
that
focus
group
and
interview
engagement
methods
capture
voices
that
represent
as
many
segments
of
the
community
as
possible.
Focus
Groups,
Stakeholder
Interviews,
and
Community
Town
Halls/Cafés
The
majority
of
the
focus
groups,
stakeholder
interviews,
and
community
town
hall/café
options
were
facilitated
using
the
Aspen
Institute’s
SOAR
method.
A
S
trengths,
O
pportunities,
A
spirations,
R
esults
(SOAR)
analysis
is
a
strategic
planning
tool
that
focuses
an
organization
on
its
current
strengths
and
vision
of
the
future
for
developing
its
strategic
goals.
SOAR
engages
at
all
functional
areas
of
an
organization,
focusing
on
what
is
currently
done
well
rather
than
concentrating
on
perceived
threats
and/or
weaknesses
(as
is
the
case
with
the
SWOT
method).
In
these
focus
groups
and
stakeholder
engagements,
the
conversations
were
not
constrained
to
focus
exclusively
on
Lincoln
Public
Library
services
as
they
are
currently
delivered.
Rather,
they
were
sufficiently
broad
so
that
reflection
and
insights
considered
the
Library
in
the
context
of
the
whole
community.
The
premise
is
that
the
libraries
are
a
constituent
part
of
the
community
fabric
and
all
are
best
served
by
taking
an
integrated
approach
to
considering
its
role
and
impact
on
residents.
This
outlook
is
in
complete
alignment
with
the
City
of
Lincoln’s
village
concept.
page
57 338
In
addition,
the
project
offered
the
opportunity
for
community
members
and
staff
to
engage
in
sessions
using
Stanford’s
design
thinking
process
to
unearth
potential
new
solutions
to
the
community’s
most
critical
needs
for
library
service.
Below
is
a
summary
of
engagements:
●
January
2,
2025:
All
Staff
Session
●
February
4,
2025:
City
Council
work
session
led
by
Library
Director
Kathryn
Hunt
●
February
5,
2025:
Library
Board
focus
group
●
February
6 and
8,
2025:
Virtual
community
town
halls
●
March
2025:
Design
activity
for
students
up
to
grade
4 in
the
March
Read
Across
America
program
(see
an
example
to
the
left)
●
March
2025:
Teen
Council
members
held
one-on-one
interviews
with
peers
●
March
19,
2025:
In-person
staff
design
thinking
session
●
March
20,
2025:
In-person
community
member
design
thinking
session
●
March
20,
2025:
In-person
drop-in
community
café
page
58 339
Information
Sharing
and
Digital
Engagement
Library
Director
Kathryn
Hunt
created
a
project
website
(
https://www.lincolnca.gov
/en/parks-recreation-and-activities/library-community-outreach-2025aspx.aspx )
to
highlight
the
work
of
the
project
and
invite
community
members
throughout
the
process
to
continue
to
share
information.
The
website
provided
an
additional
pathway
for
community
input
through
a
form
that
encouraged
community
members
to
engage
with
the
four
drop-in
community
café
questions,
ensuring
community
members
who
were
unable
to
attend
in
person
could
still
participate.
page
59 340
Resources
About
Us
-
City
of
Lincoln
,
www.lincolnca.gov/en/parks-recreation-and-activities/
about-us.aspx
.
Accessed
26 March
2025.
Amarante,
Kylie.
“Molly
MacNutt;
Marlie
Wright.”
Personal
interviews,
25 March
2025.
California
State
Library.
California
Public
Library
Statistics:
Ready
Reports
,
ca.countingopinions.com/index.php?page_id=3
.
Accessed
11 April
2025.
California
State
Library.
California
Public
Library
Statistics:
State
Data
Key
Ratios,
Resources,
Expenditure
,
ca.countingopinions.com/index.php?page_id=3
.
Accessed
19 April
2025.
City
of
Lincoln.
“Annual
Budget,
FY
2007-2008.”
City
of
Lincoln,
12 June
2007.
City
of
Lincoln.
“Annual
Budget,
FY
2008-2009.”
City
of
Lincoln,
24 June
2008.
City
of
Lincoln.
“Annual
Budget,
FY
2009-2010.”
City
of
Lincoln,
23 June
2009.
City
of
Lincoln.
“Annual
Budget,
FY
2010-2011.”
City
of
Lincoln,
June
2010.
City
of
Lincoln.
“Annual
Budget,
FY
2011-2012.”
City
of
Lincoln,
28 June
2011.
City
of
Lincoln.
“City
Council
Strategic
Planning
Report
2023-2025.”
City
of
Lincoln,
13 June
2023.
City
of
Lincoln.
“Village
5 Annexation.”
Lincoln
Village
5 ,
2025,
www.lincolnvillage5.com/annexation.html
.
Accessed
18 March
2025.
City
of
Lincoln,
Western
Placer
Unified
School
District,
Sierra
Joint
Community
College
District.
“Joint
Use
Cooperative
Agreement
for
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
at
Twelve
Bridges.”
2003.
Gangavarapu,
Charvi.
“Tanvi
Mummaneni;
Anishka
Nalluri.”
Personal
interviews,
23 March
2025.
page
60 341
“Historic
Downtown
Lincoln
CA.”
DOWNTOWN
LINCOLN
,
2024,
www.downtownlincolnca.com/whistoric-downtown
.
Accessed
26 March
2025.
Hunt,
Kathryn.
Personal
interview,
9 April,
2025.
Hunt,
Kathryn.
“Library
Funding.”
City
Council
work
session,
04 February
2025,
City
Council
chambers,
Lincoln,
CA.
Kortum,
Lucy.
“Lincoln,
Placer
County;
Gold
Country
Area,
Gold
Country
Region.”
Carnegie
Libraries
of
California
,
1999,
www.carnegie-libraries.org/california.
Accessed
14 March
2025.
Lewis
Planned
Communities
and
PBS&J.
“
Village
7 Specific
Plan
.”
City
of
Lincoln,
June
2010.
“Lincoln,
California
-
Placer
County.”
Business
View
Magazine
,
8 July
2022,
businessviewmagazine.com/lincoln-california-placer-county/ .
Accessed
26 March
2025.
Lincoln
Project
Planning
Team.
Focus
group
held
via
Zoom,
15 January
2025.
https://padlet.com/acornsandnuts/lincolnplanningteam
Lincoln
Public
Library
Advisory
Board.
Focus
group
held
via
Zoom,
5 February
2025.
https://padlet.com/acornsandnuts/LincolnBoard
Magagnini,
Steve.
“Jessica
Tavares
Overcomes
Poverty
to
Build
Thunder
Valley
Casino,
Transform
Her
Tribe
--
and
Give
Away
Millions.”
United
Auburn
Indian
Community
News
,
4 October
2007,
web.archive.org/web/20110930092415/
www.auburn
rancheria.com/
news/2007-news/the-new-chiefs-chief-executive-officer/?searchterm =tavares
.
Accessed
26 March
2025.
Mintier
&
Associates,
et
al.
“General
Plan
2050.”
City
of
Lincoln,
March
2008.
Olvera,
Adelyne.
“Sarah
Johnson;
Avery
Plummer.”
Personal
interviews,
24 March
2025.
Stockton
Associates.
“The
Library
at
Twelve
Bridges;
LIBRARY
PLAN
OF
SERVICE.”
City
of
Lincoln,
March
2003.
page
61 342
Stockton
Associates.
“Community
Library
Needs
Assessment.”
City
of
Lincoln,
March
2003.
“Supports
and
Promotes
the
Lincoln
Public
Library.”
Friends
of
the
Lincoln
Public
Library
,
7 February
2025,
lincolnlibraryfriends.org/
.
Accessed
19 April
2024.
U.S.
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics.
Consumer
Price
Index
Calculator.
https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
.
Accessed
20 April
2025.
US
Census
Bureau.
American
Community
Survey,
ACS
5-Year
Estimates
Detailed
Tables.
Accessed
01 April
2024.
Various
(students
in
fourth
grade
and
younger).
Draw
A
Picture
of
What
Your
Perfect
Day
at
the
Library
Looks
Like
.
March
and
April
2025.
Library
director’s
files.
Zimny,
Grayson.
“Leena
Halimi;
Mason
Mathis.”
Personal
interviews,
21 March
2025.
page
62 343
About Constructive Disruption
Constructive Disruption ( http://www.constructivedisruption.info ) is a woman-owned consultancy based in Oregon focusing on strategy work for local government and libraries. Constructive Disruption’s planning processes are built with a collaborative, future-focused mindset at the heart; our strengths-based, human-centered approach sets our consultancy work apart.
The Constructive Disruption consultancy functions as a cooperative, bringing together expertise tailored to each project. Team members are located across the United States; we pool our knowledge and experience in the belief that collaborators with different viewpoints create superior end products. For the Lincoln Library Funding and Community Aspirations Report, our team included:
● Stephanie Chase (she/her). Stephanie has more than 20 years of experience in public libraries on both the east and west coasts, having served as a library director or in executive leadership in small and rural public libraries as well as at Multnomah County (OR) Library, The Seattle Public Library, and the Hillsboro (OR) Public Library. Stephanie is the Founding Principal of Constructive Disruption and currently the Executive Director of the Libraries of Eastern Oregon, a 15-county resource sharing cooperative, and serves on the American Library Association’s Executive Board.
● Judah Hamer (he/his). Judah Hamer has deep experience in public and school libraries, with a career spanning over three decades. His areas of expertise are organizational development, knowledge management, and interactional analysis. In addition to more than 30 years in library service, Judah has taught extensively at the School of Communication & Information, Rutgers University (NJ) and is currently the Human Resources Manager for the Boston Public Library.
We believe in working together to break down barriers to progress. page 63
344
345
SUBJECT:
California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(CSCDA) Open PACE Program.
(Sean Scully)
SUBMITTED BY:
Sean Scully
DEPARTMENT:
City Manager's Office
DATE:
August 26, 2025
Item Number 9.B
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached resolution approving the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA) Open PACE Program.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) is a mechanism for residential and commercial property owners to finance renewable energy, energy efficiency, and water conservation projects to their properties. Property owners leverage funds based on the available equity in their property made available from a PACE provider. These providers are sponsored by a Joint Powers authority (JPA) and repay the financial obligation via a voluntary special tax or special assessment.
State law authorizes contract assessment districts in charter and general law counties to provide financing for renewable energy, energy efficiency, and water conservation (among other measures with a communal sustainability or resiliency benefit) improvements to qualified property owners. A property owner voluntarily enters into a contractual agreement with one of the Joint Power Authority (JPA) assessment districts in which they reside to access financing by securing a lien on their property and repay it as a special tax or assessment on their property tax bill. This financing mechanism is referred to as Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE).
CSCDA Open PACE is an umbrella initiative including three DFPI licensed residential PACE providers: PACE Funding Group (dba Home Run Financing), FortiFi Financial, and Renew Financial; and several commercial PACE providers. Launched in 2015 it is sponsored by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA). CSCDA Open PACE’s goal is to create a platform to vet and pre-qualify PACE administrators so that local governments only need to pass a single resolution to authorize multiple providers including specialist residential or commercial PACE providers.
In order to provide Lincoln property owners with a variety of trusted PACE finance options, the Council is asked to consider admitting licensed PACE providers by adopting a resolution approving CSCDA Open PACE Program to operate in the City.
The City of Lincoln is a
STAFF REPORT
346
member of CSCDA, and has been 1993 (City resolution 93-55 June 8).
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
PACE financing can be set up and administered under AB 811 (2008) which allows qualifying upgrades to be financed through an assessment district. Additional legislation expanded projects eligible for financing to include water efficiency improvements, electric vehicle charging stations, seismic improvements, and wildfire resiliency.
Additional laws expand the original legislation and provide for additional consumer protections:
AB 2693
(2016) enhanced disclosures to homeowners participating in PACE programs and guarantees the right to cancel PACE financing within three business days of execution. AB 2693 also prohibits marketing promises of monetary or percentage representations of increased value to a property owner regarding the effect the financed improvements will have on the market value of the property unless the market value is estimate using one of specified methods.
SB 242
(2017) requires a recorded telephone call to residential consumers to confirm key terms of the agreement. This call and contractual documents must be available in one of five enumerated non-English languages as necessary. SB 242 also prohibits kickbacks to contractors for steering consumers into a particular program and any misrepresentation as to tax deductibility of a PACE assessment contract. PACE providers are prevented from disclosing to contractors the amount of funds the property is eligible for under a PACE assessment under this law.
AB 1284
(2017) establishes state oversight for the California’s PACE program (through the regulator – Department of Financial Protection and Innovation – DFPI) and requires PACE administrators that are not local governments to obtain a license under California Financing Law. They are also held accountable for screening, training, and monitoring the contractors and sales reps enrolled in their programs. Lastly, PACE providers have to determine a consumer’s ability to repay, including income verification, before entering into a PACE assessment.
SB 465
(2018) allows for fire resiliency measures to be financed under enabling PACE legislation.
AB 1551
(2020) prohibits penalties for early prepayment, prohibits PACE financing with reverse mortgages, requires financing documents to be provided to the homeowner as a printed copy unless the homeowner opts out
AB 2471
(2020) extends the right to cancel on all home improvement contracts including PACE for persons 65 years and older from three to five days AB 790
(2021) extends laws regulating unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices with regard to the home solicitation of senior citizens for home improvements funded by PACE
DFPI regulations
(2021)
further regulated the PACE Administrator license and application process, advertising standards and standardized disclosures, complaints processes and 347
procedures, dishonest dealings and misleading statements, and PACE enrollment standards and processes.
PACENation Consumer Protection Policies
(2021). The PACE national trade association
adopted a set of consumer protection policies which included further protections for protected classes (elderly and low income), a standardized residential PACE guide for applicants, and enhanced communications to existing PACE consumers.
PACE offers an alternative to traditional means of financing property improvements such as paying cash, taking a home equity line of credit (HELOC), or using credit cards. PACE financing eligibility is primarily based on property equity and ability to pay, rather than the credit worthiness of the applicant. PACE financing has fixed term interest rates with terms generally longer than those of other private and/or unsecured loans, but equal to the average useful life of the improvement being undertaken. Some other advantages of PACE financing include 100% financing for eligible improvements, and the reliability of pre-approved, vetted, trained and strictly monitored contractors. Participation in PACE financing is voluntary.
Because the capital for PACE financing is from private sources and the transactions are between program administrators and building owners, the City will incur no cost or risk associated with program activities. The City is not required or expected to provide administrative support or marketing for the programs, which are conducted by the program administrators. However, many jurisdictions throughout the state have found that partnering in outreach and marketing can enhance the efficacy of the program. The City is not obliged to repay bonds issued by the JPA or assessments levied on the participating properties.
Enabling the City of Lincoln’s PACE availability by approving licensed program administrators will create a competitive marketplace that provides a variety of financing options with more favorable terms to home and business owners. Doing so may also incentivize more property owners to undertake improvements, resulting in the creation of more renewable energy and local jobs, reduction in energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption, among other improvement categories.
PACE has been adopted broadly regionally.
Placer County created its own PACE Program,
MPower, in 2015. In December 2020 the Board of Supervisors voted to end the exclusivity of MPower and authorized other PACE providers including those within the CSCDA Open PACE Program to operate within the unincorporated territory. MPower was closed to new applications in 2021 leaving residents of the incorporated cities and the City of Lincoln with no PACE options.
In October 2022 the City Council of Roseville voted unanimously to approve CSCDA Open PACE to operate within the territory of that City. In late 2023, the County extended their commitment to ensure property owners in the unincorporated areas have equitable access to these improvements. Since that time the following organizations have approved PACE in their communities:
Rocklin
Unincorporated Placer County
Sacramento
Rancho Cordova
348
Unincorporated Sacramento County
Citrus Heights
Elk Grove
Folsom
Galt
Wheatland
Unincorporated Yuba County
FISCAL IMPACT:
No direct fiscal impact.
Adoption of the resolution and actions contained herein will not result in any costs to the City. All costs of marketing, financial, and program administration are borne by the program administrators and covered with private capital.
ATTACHMENTS:
CDSA PACE Resolution, 2025.docx
349
Resolution No. 2025-