Agenda packet — Lincoln City Council, October 28, 2025 (part 2 of 5)

• Coordinates department budget, analysis and administration; monitors expenditures.

• Conducts research and provides administrative assistance within a department.

• Coordinates grant services, including writing, scheduling, seeking out, and identifying grants and assigning staff to follow up with the application process as necessary.

• Oversees a variety of special projects; prepares a wide variety of reports, manuals, procedures and publications; conducts policy and legislative analysis.

• Coordinates assigned work with related activities by other City departments, governmental organizations and public organizations; identifies interdepartmental cooperation opportunities.

• Provide assistance in resolving operational and adminis tration issues; identify issues and conduct research to find alternative solutions; make and assist in the implementation of recommendations.

Support Services
• Administers process of issuing business licenses to qualified applicants; obtains necessary information; records data; advises applicants on requirements; collects fees; and issuing licenses.

Answers questions and provides advice to the public regarding li censing policies, procedures, and regulations; Codes information on license applications for entry into computers. Evaluates information on applications to verify completeness and accuracy and to determine whether applicants are qualified to obtain desired licenses. Informs customers by mail or telephone of additional steps. Maintains records of applications made and licensing fees collected. Performs routine data entry and other office support activities, including creating, sorting, etc. Prepares and sends yearly renewals and delinquent notices to businesses for licenses.

• Posts customer payments by recording cash, checks, and electronic transactions. Records payments into a ledger or accounting software. Records date paid, amount, method of payment and any balance due. Prepares cash and check payments for bank deposit on a weekly basis. • Responsible for implementing the city’s travel administrative tasks. Ensures that travel requests/expenses are budgeted; Calculates estimated travel rates and expenses, using items such as rate tables and calculators; Relies on instructions and pre- established guidelines to perform travel responsibilities.

Recreation (performs essential functions, with added responsibilities listed below)

• Reviews and monitors recreation programs for, enrollment, unpaid balances, and instructor payments. Maintenance of recreation department issued scholarships. Maintenance of Home/Charter School contracts, enrollments, invoicing and payments.

• Maintenance of programs/activities in registration system. Compiling data and inputting information for Recreation Guide publications. Responsibility of keeping City website current with recreation department updates.

391

ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II

Page 3 ends

• Coordinates City facility rentals. Serves as primary contact for scheduling rentals, rental information, payments and coordination of setup/cleanup for facility rentals.

PHYSICAL, MENTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING CONDITIONS:

Position requires prolonged sitting, standing, walking, reaching, twisting, turning, kneeling, bending, squatting and stooping in the performance of daily activities. The position also requires grasping, repetitive hand movement and fine coordination in preparing reports using a computer keyboard.

Additionally, the position requires near and far vision in re ading written reports and work -related documents. Acute hearing is required when providing phone and personal service. Additionally, the incumbent in this position may work in all weather conditions including wet, hot and cold. The need to lift, drag and push files, paper and documents weighing up to 25 pounds also is required.

QUALIFICATIONS:

The following are minimal qualifications necessary for entry into the classification.

Education and/or Experience:

Any combination of education and experience that has provided the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for an Administrative Analyst I/II. A typical way of obtaining the required qualifications is to possess the equivalent of:

Administrative Analyst I
Two years of responsible administrative, analytical and technical experience. A bachelor’s degree in finance, accounting or a related field may be substituted for the two years of experience.

Administrative Analyst II
In addition to the above, two years of experience equivalent to that of an Administrative Analyst I in the City of Lincoln.

License/Certificate:

Possession of, or ability to obtain, a valid class C California driver’s license.

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES: (The following are a representative sample of the KSAs necessary to perform essential duties of the position. The level and scope of the knowledge and abilities listed below vary between the I and II levels.)

Knowledge of:

Operational characteristics, services and activities of assigned program area; Principles, practices and methods of administrative and organizational analysis; principles and practices of program and budget development and implementation; grant writing and administration; public administration policies and procedures; principles, structuring and organization of municipal agencies; methods and techniques of supervision, training and motivation; basic principles of mathematics; applicable federal, state and local laws, codes and regulations; methods and techni ques of scheduling work assignments; standard office 392

ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II

Page 4 ends

procedures, practices and equipment; modern office equipment including a computer and applicable software; methods and techniques for record keeping and report preparation and writing; proper English, spelling and grammar; occupational hazards and standard safety practices.

Skill to:

Operate an office computer and a variety of word processing, spreadsheet and other software applications; type accurately form clear copy at a rate of 45 net words per minute.

Ability to:

Perform a full range of responsible analytical and administrative duties in support of assigned programs functions, and/or department involving the use of independent judgement and personal initiative; Analyze financial, budgetary, ad ministrative, operational and organizational problems, evaluate alternatives and reach sound conclusions; develop and coordinate work programs and grants; develop and administer a budget; prepare clear and concise administrative documents and reports; crea te and manage Excel spreadsheets; research, compile, analyze, interpret and prepare a variety of fiscal, statistical and administrative reports; implement, explain and apply applicable laws, codes and regulations; train, supervise and motivate assigned staff; read, interpret and record data accurately; perform mathematical calculations quickly and accurately; make adjustments to standard operating procedures to improve effectiveness and comply with regulatory changes as appropriate; organize, prioritize and follow-up on work assignments; work independently and as part of a team; make sound decisions within established guidelines; analyze a complex issue, and develop and implement an appropriate response; observe safety principles and work in a safe manner; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; establish and maintain effective working relationships.

FLSA: Nonexempt
Employee Group: Professional/Administrative, Local 39
Resolution: 2018-254
Adopted: 11/13/2018
393

CITY OF LINCOLN

SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK

DEFINITION:

Under general supervision, perfor ms complex and responsible accounting support and administrative work in the preparation and maintenance of budgetary, accounting, financial, and statistical records .

Performs customer service functions with the public, City staff, and vendors both in person and over the phone. May serve in a lead capacity by providing technical and functional guidance to Account Clerks.

Performs other related duties as required.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS:

The Senior Account Clerk is the advanced journey -level classification in the Account Clerk series.

Incumbents are distinguished from Account Clerk I and II by the higher degree of responsibility , independence, and complexity of work performed. Senior Account Clerks handle the most difficult and technical accounting support functions, interpret and apply policies to unique and complex situations, and often serve in a lead capacity by training, guiding, and reviewing the work of lower-level Account Clerks.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED/EXERCISED:

Receives general super vision from the Customer Services Supervisor , Accounting Manager, Finance Manager, or Director of Finance. May serve in a lead capacity by providing functional and technical guidance to Account Clerks.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: (include but are not limited to the following)

• Prepares and leads the maintenance of a wide variety of complex financial records and information; utilizes and provides guidance in the use of automated financial systems and various word processing and spreadsheet programs to enter, store , and retrieve information; researches and gathers information from multiple sources for the completion of forms and preparation of reports; provides information in person and over the phone to the public, other governmental agencies and City staff, requiring judgment and interpretation of policies, rules, and procedures.

• Maintains accounting records; reconciles transactions; processes, enters, and verifies numerical or financial data related to area of assignment; handles payments at the counter and provides receipts; may serve in a lead capacity over staff performing the full range of Account Clerk duties.

• Prepares accounts payable batches for entry and revision; verifies accuracy and reconciles financial data to accounts payable statements; processes accounts payable disbursements; receives and inputs special accounts payable batches for manual checks as needed; responds to department and vendor inquiries; researches and resolves accounts payable issues.

• Receives and reviews invoice payments for accuracy, proper authorization, and account coding; reconciles payments with accounts payable invoices and research discrepancies; records accounts Class specifications are only intended to present a descriptive summary of the range of duties and responsibilities that are associated with specified positions. Therefore, specifications may not include all duties performed by individuals within a classification. In addition, specifications are intended to outline the minimum qualifications necessary for entry into the class and do not necessarily convey the qualifications of incumbents within the position. 394

SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK

Page 2 ends

receivable transactions.

• Receives and processes general cash receipt payments, ensuring accuracy, pr oper documentation, and timely deposit.

• Serves in a lead capacity for processing and maintaining customer utility billing for water, sewer and refuse services for all residential and commercial customers; processes new customer applications for utility services; receives payments for utility services, licenses, permits, and fees; explains utility billing and regulatory policies to customers; updates billing charges to customer accounts; monitors and oversees the notification delinquent account s; researches and resolves billing inquiries; and adjusts accounts as necessary.

• Prepares periodic and special reports as required; performs special projects and studies; gathers and compiles statistical and financial data for reporting purposes.

• Establishes positive working relationships with representatives of community organizations, state/local agencies and associations, City management and staff, and the public.

PHYSICAL, MENTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING CONDITIONS:

Position requires prolong ed sitting, standing, walking, kneeling, squatting and stooping in the performance of daily activities. The position also requires repetitive hand movement, and fine coordination in data entry and preparing reports using a computer keyboard. Additionally, the position requires both near and far vision in reading written reports and work-related documents. Requires clear effective communication in person and over the phone . The need to lift, drag and push files, paper and documents weighing up to 25 pounds is also required.

QUALIFICATIONS:

The following are minimal qualifications necessary for entry into the classification.

Education and/or Experience:

Any combination of education and experience that has provided the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for a Senior Account Clerk . A typical way of obtaining the required qualifications is to possess:

Education:

High school diploma or equivalent. An associate’s degree in accounting, business administration, or related field is desirable.

Experience:

Three years of increasingly responsible technical experience in financial or statistical recordkeeping, equivalent to an Account Clerk II in a public agency setting.

License/Certificate:

Possession of, or ability to obtain, a valid Class C California driver’s license.

395

SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK

Page 3 ends

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES: (The following are a representative sample of the KSAs necessary to perform essential duties of the position.)

Knowledge of:

Principles and practices of financial record keeping, bookkeeping and governmental and fund accounting; basic principles and practices of account payables and receivables; standard business arithmetic as applied to accounting technical support; methods and techniques of cash management; data entry, data base access and standard report generation; public relations techniques and procedures; basic principles of mathematics; applicable federal, state and local laws, codes and regulations; methods and technique s of scheduling work assignments; standard office procedures, practices and equipment; modern office equipment including a computer and applicable software; methods and techniques for record keeping and report preparation and writing; proper English, spelling and grammar; occupational hazards and standard safety practices.

Skill to:

Operate standard office equipment including a computer and variety of word processing and software applications; operate automated billing and financial systems.

Ability to:

Prepare, maintain and reconcile various complex financial, accounting, billing and statistical records; make arithmetic and statistical calculations quickly and accurately; implement, explain and apply applicable laws, codes and regulations; read, interpret and record data accurately; organize, prioritize and follow-up on work assignments; work independently and as part of a team; make sound decisions within established guidelines; analyze a complex issue, and develop and implement an appropriate response; follow written and oral directions; observe safety principles and work in a safe manner; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; in an effective and proper manner direct personnel; establish and maintain effective working relationships.

Salary Range:

FLSA:

Employee Group:

Refer to Professional/Administrative Salary Schedule
Nonexempt
Professional/Administrative, Local 39
396
SUBJECT:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Adopt Resolutions Approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for the proposed Parkwood Project. (Mikaela Noble)
SUBMITTED BY:

Mikaela Noble
DEPARTMENT:

Community Development
DATE:

October 28, 2025

Item Number 12.A

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, consider the information contained in the staff report and the testimony of the public, the Planning Commission’s recommendation of approval, and take the following actions:
1 .

Adopt a Resolution for the proposed addendum to the certified 2012 Village 1 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse (SCH) # 2010102018), certifying that the proposed Parkwood Project will not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new impacts, new mitigation measures, new or revised alternatives, or an increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts that would require major revisions to the EIR, and therefore, pursuant California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162, the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required. 2 .

Adopt a Resolution approving a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the proposed Parkwood Project.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Parkwood project (project) is located within the Village 1 Specific Plan (see Attachments 1 and 2). The
Village 1 Specific Plan
(Specific Plan) provides direction for development of
1,832 acres of land within the City of Lincoln (City). The Specific Plan identifies land use designations and zoning for the plan area, the circulation system, utilities systems, parks and open space, and other planning considerations. In addition, the Specific Plan includes a wide range of goals and policies, design guidelines and development standards that will guide development within Village 1.

The following is a brief timeline for the Village 1 Specific Plan and associated documents:

November 27, 2012: City certifies EIR (SCH No. 2010102018), adopts Mitigation Monitoring Plan, approves Specific Plan.

July 9, 2013: Council adopts revisions to Specific Plan and EIR addendum to address changes to Oak Tree Lane connection to Sierra College Boulevard, as well as the provision of an additional school site.

STAFF REPORT
397
2015: 1,712 acres of the Village 1 Specific Plan were annexed into the City.

Approximately 120 acres of the adopted Specific Plan were not included in that annexation due to opposition of the property owners.

March 2020: Specific Plan was revised, and rezoning adopted for area known as Turkey Creek Estates (248 acres on east side, north of McBean Park Drive). Amendments reduce amount of Village Country Estates (VCE) and increase Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) acreage in north part of Turkey Creek Estates project. This results in reduction of 128 VCE units and increase of 128 VLDR units. Parks acreage also slightly reduced with an increase in open space. Specific Plan’s total amount of developable acreage unchanged.

September 2023: Council approves amendment to the Specific Plan involving a looped re-alignment of Oak Tree Lane resulting in the elimination of the southeasterly connection to Sierra College Boulevard and minor modifications to land use plan. Total number of residential units reduced to 5,610 from 5,639.

Since 2023, Council has approved several small lot tentative maps for several Village 1 projects, most recently the Leavell Ranch which is located south and east of the Parkwood Project site.

Planning Commission Actions
The City of Lincoln Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed project on Wednesday, September 17, 2025. One member of the public asked if the projects within the Village 1 plan area were coordinated. Staff explained that the Specific Plan was designed to require coordination to ensure that the various projects work together as intended.

The Planning Commission asked when Regional Park would be developed and when Silverado Trail would be extended to the serve the park. Concern was expressed that traffic to the Regional Park would travel through the Parkwood Project. Staff indicated that the timing of the Regional Park is not known at this time, but that Silverado Trail would be extended when the park is developed and would serve as the park’s primary access.

One commissioner suggested that the Parkwood neighborhood park site be relocated to the south or that an additional park site be located in the south, so that residents in the southern portion of the project site would be closer to a park site. The Applicant explained that there is a public park in an adjacent project. Staff explained that Specific Plan anticipated that both sites (one of which will eventually be an extension of the Regional Park to the north) would be in the northern portion of the project site. Furthermore, the Parkwood project has more parkland than identified in the Specific Plan and relatively small single-family residential developments do not typically have multiple small parks (as opposed to higher density residential development).

Staff also pointed out that changes to the park locations would require that the project be redesigned and re-evaluated.

Another commissioner was concerned about the location of the sound wall and landscaping on the western boundary of the project site, and suggested that Parkwood homes be front loaded and setback along Silverado Trail. The Applicant explained that Silverado Trail was an offsite improvement, and they wanted to keep homes focused toward the internal street system.

The Planning Commission recommended, by a 7-0 vote, that the City Council approve the requested entitlements.

398
Project Location and Description
The project site is located on approximately 21 acres in the City of Lincoln south of McBean Park Drive within the Village 1 Specific Plan on Assessor’s Parcel Number 021-274-071-000 (Attachment 1). The project site is bounded by the Placer County corporation yard and former gun range and missile site to the west; undeveloped properties to the north and east, including the proposed Leavell Ranch project to the east; and the Hidden Hills subdivision to the south.

The Oak Tree Lane extension is under construction and bounds the southern border of the project site.

There are a number of existing structures on the project site associated with a vacant rural residence, including a burned home site, large metal outbuilding, garage, sheds, bridges and hardscape. These home site dates from the 1990s. None of the structures are occupied or maintained at this time, and would all be removed during site preparation for the proposed project.

The proposed project identifies one offsite improvement – the partial construction of Silverado Trail – on the adjacent County-owned parcel west of the project site. Silverado Trail is a roadway contemplated within the Village 1 Specific Plan that provides access to the Parkwood project, and ultimately, to the Regional Park west of the project site.

Land Use Designations and Zoning
The project would develop Village 1 Planning Areas (PA) 27A, 27C, 65D and 70. The Parkwood project would make minor changes to the boundaries of the land use designations for Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR) and Village Park/Recreation (VPR).

Project Components
The applicant has submitted a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the creation of the specific lots within the project site (Attachment 6, Exhibit B). The map would create 122 residential lots, 2 park lots and 4 landscape lots. All units would be built as VMDR, with an overall average density of 7.7 units per acre, which is consistent with the VMDR designation.

The proposed project also includes two parks – including a portion of the Regional Park site that will be dedicated to the City – occupying a total of 4.2 acres and approximately 0.40 acres of landscape corridors. The layout of the proposed project is shown in Attachment 3. The VPR-zoned portion of the northwestern edge of the property contains a portion of a large pond that is intended to be incorporated into a future Regional Park when the Specific Plan is fully developed.

The proposed project would develop the project site with land uses and densities that are consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. The acreage for each use would vary slightly from the adopted Specific Plan, as shown in Table 1 and Attachment 4. In addition, parcel boundaries would be modified slightly, including the boundaries for the VPR parcels. As a result, there would be an increase of 1.4 acres of parks and recreation acreage, an increase of 85 percent for the project site. The amount of acreage for residential uses would be reduced by approximately 1.4 acres, or about 8 percent.

Table 1
Land Use Comparison
399
Land Use/Zone
Adopted Specific
Plan Acreage
Proposed
Acreage
Difference
Village Medium Density
Residential (VMDR)

17.2 15.8
-1.4
Village Parks and
Recreation (VPR)

2.8 4.2
+1.4
Landscape Corridor

0.4 0.4
0 Rights-of-Way

0.5 0.5
0 Total

20.9 20.9
0 The 122 residences built within the project site would be single or two story. All units would be single family. Lots would range from 29 to 135 feet in width (most lots would be 40-45 feet wide) and 78 to 142 feet in depth. Lot sizes would range from 3,238 square feet to 8,856 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,174 square feet.

Circulation
Primary access to the project site would be provided by Silverado Trail, a new collector street proposed north of Oak Tree Lane abutting the western perimeter of the project site. Silverado Trail would be constructed through an agreement with the adjacent landowner. Agreement negotiation is in process and would be completed prior to Final Map approval. Silverado Trail would have two 11-foot travel lanes. Separated sidewalks, bike/NEV lanes and planters would be provided on either side of the roadway. Ultimately, Silverado Trail is intended to be extended farther north in order to provide access to the planned Regional Park west of the project site in the future.

Secondary site access would be provided by a connection to the extension of Oak Tree Lane, which is currently under construction as part of the Hidden Hills subdivision development. Oak Tree Lane adjacent to the project site is planned to have single travel lanes in each direction and a 13-foot median, with bike/NEV lanes, separated sidewalks and masonry sound walls on each side.

Internal streets would have two travel lanes and either separated or adjacent sidewalks. An east-west roadway connection is proposed to be provided to the adjacent property project to the east. No trails are proposed to be built with this project; however, a future trail may be provided in the VPR parcel that is intended to be incorporated into the Regional Park.

Utilities
New onsite and offsite infrastructure are proposed to be constructed as part of the project consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan. Water, sewer and drainage services will be provided by the City of Lincoln. Under the Village 1 Specific Plan, major water, sewer and dry utility lines would be placed within the Oak Tree Lane right-of-way, connecting to lines in McBean Park Drive. The proposed project’s utility lines will connect to the lines beneath Oak Tree Lane. The utilities within Oak Tree Lane are currently being constructed and are anticipated to be complete prior to buildout of the proposed project. The proposed project is intended to be served entirely by gravity flow. As an alternative, a lift station may be installed in Silverado Trail if necessary in order to make the sewer system work efficiently.

Project stormwater runoff would be conveyed to the northern park site, entering the existing 400
swales and flowing into the pond in the northwest corner of the project site, and from there to the larger pond to the north. Silverado Trail would be captured in storm drain lines within the road. The northern portion would connect to the project storm drain system; the southern portion would discharge to the system within Oak Tree Lane.

Other
Temporary construction easements (CE) are proposed outside of the project site. CEs are proposed west of the project site within the Regional Park site, and north of the project site within an area designated Village High Density Residential (VHDR). Another CE is proposed east within a portion of Leavell Ranch project designated VMDR. Development of this area was addressed in the CEQA Addendum prepared for the Leavell Ranch project prior to its recent approval.

The intent of these easements is to allow some grading offsite on the adjacent parcels to conform to grading on the project site. At this time, the only project that is anticipated to be constructed in the same timeframe as the proposed project is Leavell Ranch to the east.

Similar to Leavell Ranch, development on the parcels to the west and north would be subject to CEQA prior to any ground disturbance. Therefore, the CEs are not addressed further in this Addendum.

The applicant intends to transfer some density from the project site to another project (Stardust 12), under the same ownership, in the eastern portion of Village 1 (APNs 021-274- 038 and-039). The construction of the Parkwood project is not contingent on development of the Stardust 12 project that would receive the density transfer, and the City will not be approving the transfer as part of the Parkwood project approvals. The environmental impacts of increasing the density on the Stardust 12 project will be addressed as part of the CEQA analysis for that project, and the City will then decide whether to approve the transfer.

Therefore, the density transfer is not addressed further in the Parkwood project Addendum to the EIR.

Development Agreement
The Village 1 Specific Plan requires adoption of a
Development Agreement
, which delineates
the obligation of the project proponent and the City with respect to the project. Typically, the Development Agreement vests the right of the developer to develop the project as approved and sets out obligations of both the City and the developer. The provisions of the Development Agreement run with the property, so they continue to be in force even if the property ownership is transferred. The term of the Development Agreement is 20 years after the effective date. The Final Development Agreement must be adopted by Ordinance by the City Council. The Parkwood Project Development Agreement is undergoing a separate negotiation process between the applicant and City staff, and will be considered separate from the tentative subdivision map at a later date.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

General Plan
The 2050 City of Lincoln General Plan serves as the guiding land use document for the City of Lincoln. The proposed Parkwood project application is consistent with the applicable policies of the 2050 General Plan as follows:

A
.

The proposed Parkwood project will increase the housing stock and diversity in the City by developing 122 medium-density residential units at an overall density of 7.7 units per acre (Housing Element Policy 2 and Policy LU-1.7).
401
B
.

The proposed Parkwood project, as conditioned, includes the developed parkland, and payment of fees, which will provide open space and recreation opportunities for the enjoyment and well-being of local residents (Land Use Element Policies LU-1.11, LU-

12.7, LU-15.17 and LU-15.18).

C
.

Future residents and employees would have the option of walking and bicycling by connecting to Oak Tree Lane which will connect to the City’s existing trail network along McBean Park Drive. In addition, the project site is located adjacent to the future Regional Park, with access via Silverado Trail and Oak Tree Lane, both of which will have dedicated bike lanes. For these reasons, the proposed Parkwood project is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.6, Goal T-5 and related policies that address bicycle and trail circulation (Transportation Element Policies T-5.6, T-5.7, T-5.9, and OSC-7.20) D
.

The proposed Parkwood project preserves and protects existing biological resources including both wildlife and vegetative habitat (Open Space Element Policies OSC-1 and OSC-5 and LU-1.11) by preserving the portion of the large pond that occurs within the northernmost portion of the project site. In addition, the project shall comply with Chapter

18.69 of the City’s Zoning Code and the City of Lincoln Guidelines for Development around Oak Trees as well as mitigation measures contained in the Village 1 EIR (Policy OSC-5.1). The project will also avoid and/or compensate for the loss of wetlands within the project site, consistent with Policies OSC-5.2 and OSC-5.6.

E
.

The plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and mitigation measures provided in the EIR to minimize drainage concentrations and impervious coverage (Policy PFS-

4.2).

F
.

An archaeological study has been conducted within the project site consistent with the EIR mitigation measures and Policies OSC 6.3, 6.7, and 6.8.

Village 1 Specific Plan
The Village 1 Specific Plan is intended to direct the location and nature of development within the Specific Plan area, including the Parkwood project site. The proposed Parkwood project is consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan as follows:

Policies
The proposed Parkwood project is consistent with the requirements of the Village 1 Specific Plan, including:

A
.

The Parkwood project would develop residential uses in a VMDR zone, consistent with Chapter 3, Land Use Plan.

B
.

The Parkwood project would provide frontage improvements to Oak Tree Lane as specified in Chapter 4, Circulation Plan, of the Village 1 Specific Plan including a bike lane, sidewalk and NEV lane.

C
.

The Parkwood project would connect to water, sewer and dry utilities systems and provide drainage facilities as required by Chapter 5, Infrastructure and Public Facilities plan.

D
.

As discussed in more detail below, the Parkwood project would develop a park within the project boundaries and provide open space consistent Chapter 5 and Chapter 6, Resource Management Plan.

E
.

The project site supports a small number of wetlands and special-status species habitat, but surveys did not identify any significant cultural resources. Consistent with Chapter 6, Resource Management Plan, the proposed Parkwood project would obtain a 404 permit prior to filling any wetlands and will mitigate potential impacts on special-status species.

Land Use Designation Changes
402
The Village 1 Specific Plan allows for minor variations in land uses. The project complies with the adopted land uses designated for the project site; however, one park site would be relocated to be adjacent to the Regional Park (see Attachments 3 and 4), and the amount of park acreage would be increased. The Director of the Community Development Department has determined that the proposed revisions would be minor and enhance the project’s design; therefore, the revisions are consistent with the direction and/or goals and policies of the General Plan and Village 1 Specific Plan.

Parks and Open Space
New development within Lincoln is required to provide both preserved open space and traditional parks. The Village 1 Specific Plan includes a total of 741 acres of open space and parks (including a golf course). In reviewing the appropriate amount of parkland within a development project located in Village 1, the City considers the amount of parkland (Quimby Act) anticipated in the Village 1 Specific Plan, the General Plan park standards, and the unique characteristics of the individual project.

The Village 1 Specific Plan establishes the household population (number of persons expected per household) for various residential densities. The assumed household population of VMDR development is approximately 2.8 persons per household. Given the project proposes a maximum of 122 VMDR homes, it is assumed that the Parkwood project will have approximately 342 residents at build out. Therefore, the Parkwood project would be required to provide for 0.83 acres of neighborhood park, 1.02 acres of City-wide regional park and 1.02 acres of open space.

The project’s obligation of 0.83 acres of neighborhood parks will be met through the development of approximately 1.5 acres of parkland on the project site. The obligation for

1.02 acres of regional park will be met through dedication of 2.7 acres of parkland in the northwest corner of the project site; this area will eventually become part of the regional park.

In addition, the proposed project would be subject to park fees as required by Mitigation Measure 4.12-7. These fees would offset the cost of constructing the neighborhood/community parks and open space amenities planned within the Village 1 plan area, which could include developing the remainder of the lakefront in the western portion of the Specific Plan area, other recreational amenities that are adjacent to the Parkwood project site, or other park sites.

The project’s obligation for 1.02 acres of open space is met through the designation of open space throughout Village 1. The proposed project would not increase the demand for open space beyond the level identified in the Specific Plan.

Lincoln Municipal Code Title 17 – Subdivisions
The project was reviewed and verified for compliance with LMC Chapter 17.12.050
(Findings
Required for Map Approval) including consistency with the applicable policies of the General Plan and Village 1 Specific Plan, suitability of the type, density, design and intensity of the 403
development, and potential environmental effects of the project.

Departmental Review and Conditions of Approval
The project has been reviewed by various affected city departments, including the Engineering Division, Police Department and Fire Department. Based on this review, conditions of approval (COA) are being recommended for the project including requirements for submittal of required studies and plans, including a water study, storm water quality maintenance and operation plan, sanitary sewer report, soils report, erosion control program, a storm water quality plan, a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), landscaping plan, street lighting plan, utility line sizing study, and Wildland Fire Management Program. Requirements are provided for the design of ADA-compliant ramps from sidewalks to streets, timing of roadway improvements, street lighting, and landscaping, as well as standard requirements for septic tank removal, blasting, construction, building and occupancy permits. The conditions of approval also include the requirement of compliance to the applicable mitigation measures from the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program for the certified EIR.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

In accordance with Government Code Section 65457(a) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), any residential project meeting the development density or undertaken pursuant to and in conformity with a specific plan (e.g., Village 1 Specific Plan) adopted pursuant to Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8 of the Government Code is exempt from further environmental review. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(b)(2) states that if a project falls within the scope of the project described in a Program EIR, and no subsequent environmental review would be required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, then no new environmental document is required. As discussed in more detail in the Addendum prepared for the project (see Attachment 5, Exhibit A), the proposed Parkwood project is in conformance with the previously certified Final EIR (SCH #2010102018) prepared for the Village 1 Specific Plan. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. Original applicable mitigation measures from the certified EIR shall be applied and are attached as part of Attachment 5, Exhibit B (Mitigation Monitoring Program).

Tribal Consultation
As required by Village 1 EIR Mitigation Measure 4.5-2, the City contacted the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC) to inquire whether they would like to consult with the City regarding the protection of traditional tribal and cultural places that might be present in the area. The UAIC did request consultation, and was provided with information regarding the conceptual project layout and known archaeological resources. Representatives of the UAIC and the applicant, along with City staff, conducted one site visit during consultation. Negotiation with the tribe resulted in agreement with respect to onsite monitoring and construction activities, and consultation was closed on October 10, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All costs associated with the application are assumed by the project applicant and recovered by the City. If the Project is adopted, the Village 1 Specific Plan IFP will be amended to reflect the costs of infrastructure associated with the Project as approved.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 Project Location
Attachment 2 Surrounding Land Uses
404
Attachment 3 Land Use Comparison
Attachment 4 Project Layout.pdf
Attachment 5 Parkwood Addendum Resolution.pdf
Attachment 6 Parkwood SLTSM Resolution.pdf
Attachment 5 Parkwood Addendum Resolution.docx
Attachment 6 Parkwood SLTSM Resolution.docx
405
193
FER
DEL
RAN
RD

WEBB BLVD

MCBEAN PARK DRIVE

PROJECT
SITE
RARI
CH
OAK
TREE

LANE STARDUST LANE

LOCATION MAP
nts
Attachment 1: Project Location Map
406
Attachment 2: Surrounding Land Uses
407

LAND USE ADJUSTMENTS

PARKWOOD TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
A PORTION OF PARCEL PA 27 IN THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN

CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 25, 2025

LAND USE ADJUSTMENTS - PARKWOOD

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3741 Douglas Blvd., Suite 150 Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Roseville, CA 95661
0 NORTH 150
300
600

EXISTING PROPOSED
VMDR

17.2 ± AC.

VMDR

15.8 ± AC.

VPR

1.0 ± AC.

VPR

1.8 ± AC.

VPR

1.5 ± AC.

VPR

2.7 ± AC.

VOS

0.3 ± AC.

VOS

0.3 ± AC.

VOS

0.1 ± AC.

VPR
VLDR
VLDR
VMDR
VMDR

VHDRVHDRVPR
VPR
VLDR
VLDR
VMDR
VMDR

VHDRVHDRVPR
VLDR

OAK TREE LANE OAK TREE LANE

SILVERADO
TRAIL

LAND USE SUMMARY

VLDRVOS

0.1 ± AC.

ROW

0.5 ± AC.

ROW

0.5 ± AC.

Attachment 3:

Land Use
Comparison
408
4,946 SF
5,303 SF
7,435 SF
7,352 SF
3,655 SF
3,655 SF
3,655 SF
4,271 SF
3,978 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,591 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
119,975 SF
5,268 SF
5,826 SF
4,709 SF
3,645 SF
4,028 SF
3,734 SF
3,485 SF
3,563 SF
4,002 SF
4,211 SF
3,858 SF
4,208 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,403 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
4,514 SF
3,400 SF
5,447 SF4,206 SF4,073 SF4,687 SF
7,158 SF
4,588 SF
3,665
SF3,668
SF
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
3233343536
3750
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62 63 64
44 43
42 41403938
49 48
47 4546
656667
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
122
121
120
119
118117116115114113
96 97 112 111
110
109
108
107
106
98 99
100
101
102
103 104 105
1 85'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
37'
109'
89'
125'
54'
88'
38'
12'
85'
40'
85'
32'
85'
40'
40'
91' 44'
92'
44'
85'
40'25'
83'
74'
97'
52'
53'
88'
88'40'
40'
53'
82'
80'
85'
40'
40'44'
79'
49'
85'
85'
45'
46'
167'
165'
85'
40'
78'
65'
85'
44'
72'
20'36'
40'
87'
46'
86'
81'
113'
85'
40'
40'
40'
85'
41'
85'
99'
60'
172'
56' 45'
37'
90'
156'
314'
169'
234'
39'
59'
85'
44'
44'
53'
40' 40'
84'
85'
40'
40'40'
40'
85'
41'
85'
45'
80'
128'
139'
82'
50'
87'
85'
44'
44'
406'
102'
41'
93'
42'
85'
40'
40'40'
40'
85'
41'
85'
45'
88'
94'
80'
89'
85'
44'
44'
83'
41'
98'
40'
40'
18'
85'
40'
40'
40'
85'
57'
90'
39'
113'
85'
44'
44'
45'
111'
102'
98'
42'
85'
40'
40'40'
40'
85'
53'
85'
84'
79'
30'
44'
85'
50'
50'
85'
44'
44'
45'
123'
95'
40'
53'
40'40'
40'
85'
94'
80'
41'
84'
85'
40'
40'
85'
44'
44'
45'
135'
25'
93'
40'
40'
40'
85'
89'
40'
90'
54'
42'
42'
84'
85'
40'
40'
50'
39' 49'
53'
80'
85'
40'40'
40'
85'
85'
43'
85'
88'
52'
53'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
53'
53'
53'
85'
43'
43'
85'
53'
75'
93'
103'
85'
40'
40'85'
40'
40'
55'
85'
40'
85'
40'
40'
95'
54'
89'
43'
43'
85'
116'
48'
98'
96'
32'
42'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
83' 86'
44'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
48'
80'
52'
93'
100'
32'
97'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
87'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
47'
84'
52' 142' 115'
32'
85'
40'
40'
40'
40'
89'
40'
40'
40'
70'
55'
84'
115'
32'
40'
41'
40'
92'
40'
40'
40'
50'
43'
86'
53'
44'
46'
53'
107'58'
68'
59'
44'
69' 47' 47' 47'
84'
53'
53'
85'
53'
85'
195'
97'
414'
25'
25'
25'
90'
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
3,738 SF
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
4,216 SF
4,216 SF
4,209 SF
4,630 SF
4,524 SF
4,208 SF
3,713
SF 3,520
SF
42'
43'
3,304 SF
4,403 SF
4,305 SF 3,980 SF
3,516
SF
56'3,633 SF
4,516 SF
4,394 SF
3,912 SF
5,031 SF
64,855 SF
8,522 SF
6,261 SF
4,524 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
4,362 SF
4,358 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,402 SF
7,139 SF
5,734 SF4,167 SF3,512
SF
8,586 SF 4,671 SF
3,238 SF
7,220 SF
7,788 SF
4,590 SF
4,383 SF
5,309 SF
3,625
SF
4,182 SF
4,194 SF3,526
SF
3,734 SF
3,400 SF
85'
41'
27'
31'
24'
17'
41'40'40'40'53'
40'
6'
85'85'
53'
45'
53'
41'
61'
51'
54'
40'
68'
135'
51'
42'
30'
57'
29'
29'
31'
93'
3,842 SF
3,439 SF
34'
4,514 SF
4,690
SF
3,654
SF3,660
SF
30' 31'
74'
10'
85'
38'
40'
40'

DETAIL A
N18°03'09"E 575.42'
N06°22'28"E 60.34'
N18°01'46"W 1062.29'
N72°01'45"W 350.06'
N87°03'38"E 179.66'
N81°22'36"E 127.74'
N73°52'26"E 134.09'
N00°14'11"W 66.92'
N89°54'41"E 583.30'
N00°32'17"W 59.95'
N89°33'44"E 550.52'
N00°17'47"W 1660.66'

ROCK CANYON HOLDINGS LLC
021-274-035-000 ROCK CANYON HOLDINGS LLC
021-274-034-000

COUNTY OF PLACER
021-274-061-000

CENTURY COMMUNITIES

OF CALIFORNIA
021-274-068-000

LEAVELL
021-274-066-000

LEAVELL
021-274-065-000

LEAVELL
021-274-036-000

OAK TREE LANE

CENTURY COMMUNITIES

OF CALIFORNIA
021-274-069-000

STREET B

STREET C COURT C

COURT B

STREET D

STREET B
ST. D ST. C
STREET
44'
44'
44'
44'44'50'
44'
44'
44'44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
R=250'
R=250'
R=840'
R=250'
56'
56'
A
R=300'
56'

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT 2018-0000479
(TO BE QUITCLAIMED)
I.O.D. EASEMENT P.U.E./M.U.E. 2017-
0090348 & 349 (TO BE ABANDONED)

IOD EASEMENT PUE
2022-0036585

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
2022-0036586

RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT 4 PM 56
(TO BE QUITCLAIMED

PRIOR TO FINAL MAP

ACCEPTANCE)

WLE EASEMENT
93-029292
(TO BE ABANDONED)
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 1364.419
& 431 (TO BE QUITCLAIMED)

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
2017-0090347 (TO BE ABANDONED)
66'
55'
R=1,000'
55'
55'
R=500'

1.5 ± AC.

LOT A
PARK

2.7 ± AC.

LOT B
PARK
LOT D

LANDSCAPE

0.1 ± AC.

LOT F

LANDSCAPE

0.1 ± AC.

0.2 ± AC.

D
D
C
D
D
B
A

SILVERADO TRAIL
(122) 40'x80' (TYP.)

15.8 ± AC.

UNIT 1

PUBLIC UTILITY

EASEMENT

OVER LOT C
R=50'
R=50'
R=25'R=25'
R=25'
R=50'R=50'
R=50'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22' R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22' R=50'
R=50'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=22'
R=26'
R=26'
LOT E

LANDSCAPE
R=26'
R=26'
R=50'
R=50'
LOT C

LANDSCAPE

0.0 ± AC.

12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)

12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)
R= 500'
R=500'
E
AREA "K"
4 PM 56
PARCEL "C" 4 PM 56
16 7
14 13
8 12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)
193
FER
DEL
RAN
RD

WEBB BLVD

MCBEAN PARK DRIVE

PROJECT
SITE
RARI
CH

OAKTREE
LANE

STARDUST LANE
55' RIGHT OF WAY

OAK TREE LANE
SCALE: NTS
A
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/L.S.E.

LANDSCAPE
MEDIAN
25'

MASONRY
WALL (TYP.)
8' 3' 13'11'7'

WALK TRAVEL LANE

27.5'
CLC
R/W
55'
6'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/L.S.E.
25'
8' 3'11' 7'

WALKTRAVEL LANE

27.5'
R/W
6'
BIKE/

NEV LANE
BIKE/

NEV LANE
STREET
TREES (TYP.)

PLANTERPLANTERC/G C/GMEDIAN

MASONRY
WALL (TYP.)

PARKWOOD

SUBDIVISION
105'
(FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS

BY OTHERS)

12.5'
P.U.E.

SCALE: NTS

PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL (WITH ON-STREET PARKING)
56' RIGHT OF WAYC
6' 3' 15'4'

WALK PLANTER TRAVEL LANE
28'
6' 3'15' 4'

WALKPLANTERTRAVEL LANE
28'
CLC

R/W R/W
56'
STREET
TREES (TYP.)

MINOR RESIDENTIAL (WITH ON-STREET PARKING)
SCALE: NTS
44' RIGHT OF WAYD
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
15'3'
22'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALK TRAVEL LANE
15' 3'
22'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALKTRAVEL LANE
CLC

R/W R/W
44'

PARKING
(TYP.)

12.5'
P.U.E.

12.5'
P.U.E.C/G
C/G
C/G
C/G

PARKING
(TYP.)

PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL AT ENTRY
SCALE: NTS
50' RIGHT OF WAYE
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
18'3'
25'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALK TRAVEL LANE
18' 3'
25'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALKTRAVEL LANE
CLC

R/W R/W
50'
C/GC/G

PARKING
(TYP.)

ROLLED CURB
(TYP.)

ROLLED CURB
(TYP.)
16'
5'
5'
4'
4'
4'
4'
16'
5'5'
4'
4'
16'
59'
32'
59'
32'
59'
32' 32'
59'
59'
32'
32'
59'
7,435 SF
7,352 SF
3,655 SF
3,655 SF
3,655 SF
119,975 SF
5,061 SF
8 9
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
122
121
120
119
118117116115114113
125'
54'
88'
38'
97'
52'
53'
88'
88'
40'
87'
46'
86' 99'
60'
172'
56' 45' 314'
169'
234'
53'
85'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
44'
85'
40'
40'
44'
60'
40'
85' 44'
90'
54'
49'
85'
40'
85'
43'
85'
88'
52'
85'
60'
43'
43'
85'
53'
85'
40'
40'
43'
43'
85'
116'
48'
98'
96'
32'
42'
40'
85'
40'
60'
93'
100'
32'
97'
40'
85'
40'
142' 115'
32'
70'
115'
32'
50'
43'
86'
53'
53'
85'
195'
97'
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
4,216 SF
4,209 SF
4,630 SF
4,524 SF
4,208 SF
3,713
SF 3,520
SF
42'
43'
56'3,633 SF
4,516 SF
4,394 SF
3,912 SF
5,031 SF
64,855 SF
8,522 SF
6,261 SF
4,524 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
85'
41'
27'
31'
24'
17'
41'40'40'40'60'
40'
6'
85'85'
93'
3,439 SF
34'
5,057 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,403 SF
3,400 SF
30'
30'
N89°54'41"E 583.30'
N00°32'17"W 59.95'

LEAVELL
021-274-065-000

COURT C

COURT B
STREET
44'
44'
56'
A
R=300'
56'
EASEMENT 4 PM 56

1.5 ± AC.

LOT A
PARK

2.7 ± AC.

LOT B
VPR
D R=50'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22' R=50'
R=50'

12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)

0.1 ± AC.

LOT G

LANDSCAPE

SILVERADO TRAIL (FUTURE OFFSITE ROAD)
SCALE: NTS
42' PUBLIC STREET EASEMENTB
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
PSE
7' 11'3'
21'
5' 6'

TRAVEL LANEBIKE
LANE
PSE
7'11' 3'
21'
5'6'

TRAVEL LANEBIKE
LANE
20'

LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/
L.S.E.
20'

LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/
L.S.E.

CLC
42'

C/G C/G

PARKWOOD

SUBDIVISION

WALK PLANTER PLANTERWALK
82'

MASONRY
WALL (TYP.)
(FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS

BY OTHERS)

12.5'
P.U.E.

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

PARKWOOD

CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 5, 2025

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP - PARKWOOD
100
200 0
NORTH400

PROJECT NOTES

LOCATION MAP

LOT SUMMARY
nts
NOTE:
1)SUBDIVIDER(S) RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
2)EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY WOOD RODGERS AND WAS FLOWN IN 2024. CITY OF LINCOLN BENCHMARK "LIN-8A."
3)UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON MAP, ALL UTILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT.
4)

ALL EXISTING RECORDED EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY HAVE BEEN VERIFIED AND ARE SHOWN HEREON.
5)OWNER WILL DEDICATE ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ALL ONSITE UTILITIES AND ROADWAYS.
6)A 12.5' P.U.E. SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP.
7)THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.
8)ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING WELLS TO BE REMOVED OR TO REMAIN AS NOTED.
9)THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR TENTATIVE MAP PURPOSES ONLY. ALL SITE CHARACTERISTICS ARE TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL MAP.
10)MASTER UTILITY STUDIES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL. 11)

LOT LINES MAY BE ADJUSTED AT THE TIME OF FINAL MAP PROVIDED THAT NO ADDITIONAL LOTS ARE

CREATED AND RESULTING DESIGN IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP.
12) FINAL SUBDIVISION MAPPING SHALL BE PREPARED TO IDENTIFY ALL R/W, IOD, AND/OR PUBLIC/

PRIVATE STREETS, IF ANY, NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE CONSTRUCTION PHASING OF THE VILLAGES SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP.
13) ALL PUBLIC STREETS, LIGHTS, AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARDS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN OTHERWISE HEREON.
14) PURSUANT TO SECTION 66499.20.2 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE PROPERTY WILL BE MERGED AND RESUBDIVIDED AND THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC EASEMENTS ARE TO BE ABANDONED:·IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION - PUBLIC STREET AND HIGHWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES - DOC #2017-0090374, O.R.P.C.
·IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION - PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - DOC #2017-0090348, O.R.P.C. ·IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION - MUNICIPAL USE EASEMENT - DOC #2017-0090349, O.R.P.C.
·WATERLINE EASEMENT - 69 DEEDS 151, O.R.P.C.
·WATERLINE EASEMENT - 139 DEEDS 175, O.R.P.C.
15) THE FOLLOWING PRIVATE EASEMENTS TO BE QUITCLAIMED:
·ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT - 1364 O.R. 419, O.R.P.C.
·ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT - 1364 O.R. 431, O.R.P.C.
·ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT - 1506 O.R. 619, O.R.P.C.
·TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT - DOC #2018-0000479, O.R.P.C. ·TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT - DOC #2018-0084570, O.R.P.C. ·TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT - DOC #2022-0014992, O.R.P.C.

RECORD OWNER
8861 PARKWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC
3824 SKYLINE ROAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
CONTACT: PAUL SEARS
PHONE: (818) 974-7126

APPLICANT/DEVELOPER
JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC
1478 STONE POINT DRIVE, SUITE 100
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
CONTACT: JOHN JEWETT
PHONE: (530) 550-5525

PLANNER/ENGINEER
WOOD RODGERS INC.
3741 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 150
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
CONTACT:

PLANNER: VANCE JONES
ENGINEER: JASON REED, PE C66631
PHONE: (916) 341-7760

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
021-274-071
AREA

20.9± ACRES GROSS

RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZES
AVERAGE: 4,174 SQ. FT.

MAXIMUM: 8,586 SQ. FT.

MINIMUM: 3,238 SQ. FT.

NUMBER OF LOTS
122 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS
2 PARK LOTS
4 LANDSCAPE LOTS
128 LOTS TOTAL

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)

PARKS & RECREATION (PR)

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)

PARKS & RECREATION (PR)

EXISTING ZONING

VILLAGE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VMDR)

VILLAGE PARKS & RECREATION (VPR)

PROPOSED ZONING

VILLAGE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VMDR)

VILLAGE PARKS & RECREATION (VPR)

PARKS & RECREATION

CITY OF LINCOLN

POLICE & FIRE PROTECTION

CITY OF LINCOLN

SCHOOL DISTRICT

WESTERN PLACER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
SEWER

CITY OF LINCOLN

STORM DRAIN

CITY OF LINCOLN
WATER

CITY OF LINCOLN

ELECTRICITY
PG&E
GAS
PG&E
SHEET 1 OF 3

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3741 Douglas Blvd, Suite 150Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767 Roseville, CA 95661
1" = 40'
DETAIL A:

FIT TEMPLATE AT SETBACKS

STREET D
61 62 63 64
60 46 45
656667
59 68
1" = 100'

ALTERNATIVE WITH

NO ACCESS ROAD TO EAST

THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS BASED

ON THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED

IN THE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT ISSUED BY

PLACER TITLE COMPANY, REPORT NUMBER
P-611272, DATED DECEMBER 3, 2024. ALL

EASEMENTS SHOWN IN THE REPORT ARE

SHOWN HEREON OR IF AN EASEMENT IS

NOT PLOTTABLE OR BLANKET, A NOTE TO
THAT EFFECT IS SHOWN HEREON. ANY

PUBLIC EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED
ARE SHOWN AS "TO BE ABANDONED WITH
THE FINAL MAP" (IF APPLICABLE).

SURVEYOR'S

STATEMENT
NORTH
NORTH

INDICATES

REPORT ITEM
NUMBER
XX
13 14
15 18
17 16
10 7
6 5
4 12/31/2025
09/05/2025
NOTE:

REFER TO SHEET 3 FOR

ALTERNATE PROVIDING

DRAIN CONNECTION AND

OVERLAND RELEASE TO

SERVE RUNOFF FORM HTE
LEAVELL PROPERTY.

FROM THE
Attachment 4: Project Layout
409
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-
A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARING HOUSE # 2010102018) CERTIFYING THAT THE PARKWOOD PROJECT WILL

NOT RESULT IN ANY NEW SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPORTANCE, NEW

IMPACTS, NEW MITIGATION MEASURES, NEW OR REVISED ALTERNATIVES, OR AN INCREASE IN

THE SEVERITY OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED IMPACTS THAT WOULD REQUIRE MAJOR REVISIONS TO THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15162, THE

PREPARATION OF AN ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL OR SUBSEQUENT EIR IS NOT REQUIRED (APPLICANT: JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC / PROPERTY OWNER: PARKWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC) W
HEREAS, the City of Lincoln received an application from JEN California 28, LLC seeking City approval of the Parkwood Project; and
W
HEREAS, the proposed Parkwood Project includes residential uses and parks and recreation consistent with the Village 1 land use designations and applicable development standards for the Parkwood Project site; and
W
HEREAS, on November 27, 2012, the City Council of the City of Lincoln certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Village 1 Specific Plan (SCH #2010102018), which analyzed the environmental impacts of development within the 1,832 -acre Specific Plan project area, including up to 5,639 dwelling units at ranges of 1.0 to 25.0 units per acre. Approximately 985 of the 1,832 acres are dedicated to residential uses, with approximately 40 acres o f mixed- uses that could include residential development, retail, office, and public/semi- public facilities.

Other uses included the existing Turkey Creek Golf Course, open space, parks, an elementary school and city-owned facilities; and
W
HEREAS, on September 26, 2023, the City Council certified that the Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan analyzed changes to the Village 1 land use plan, including the realignment of Oak Tree Lane, associated revisions to the land use designations and a reduction in the total number of residential units to 5,610; and
W
HEREAS, all mitigation measures identified within the previously certified Final EIR and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program, as revised on September 26, 2023, which is included as Exhibit B, shall remain applicable to the Parkwood Project; and W
HEREAS, the mitigation measures provided within the previously certified Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan have been imposed on and incorporated into the Project as Conditions of Approval, and will mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects; and 410
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, the Project will not substantially modify the location of or area of land disturbance and will retain all lands previously anticipated to be preserved and undisturbed as analyzed in the EIR; and

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln, as Lead Agency, has determined the Project includes minor technical changes as allowed in the Village 1 Specific Plan; and an Addendum to the certified EIR has been prepared (provided as Exhibit A); and

WHEREAS, the City consulted with the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC) and reached agreement on treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources that could be affected by the Project, with consultation closing on Month, Day, Year; and

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the above Environmental Documents, and recommended that the City Council determine the Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the EIR and certify the Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR; and

WHEREAS, notices describing the Parkwood Project and the time and place of the City Council hearing, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered was published in the Lincoln News Messenger and sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to Chapter 18.92 of the Lincoln Municipal Code; and

WHEREAS, on October 28, 2025, the City Council did hold a duly noti ced public hearing and, following discussion and public testimony, voted to determine the Project would not result in any new significant environment effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects pervious identified in the EIR.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated by reference.

Section 2. All mitigation measures contained within the Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan Project (SCH #2010102018), as revised, shall remain in force and effect and shall, to the extent still relevant, apply to the Project.

Section 3. Based upon the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and 15162 and the documentation provided in Exhibit A, Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required prior to approval of the proposed entitlements.
411
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 3 of 3 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

Exhibits:

A. Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR for the Parkwood Project B. Village 1 Specific Plan EIR Mitigation Monitoring Report

412
The Parkwood Project Addendum
1 September 2025

PARKWOOD PROJECT IN VILLAGE 1
CE

QA ADDENDUM

INTRODUCTION
The Parkwood project (proposed project) is located within the Village 1 Specific Plan. The Village 1 Specific Plan (Specific Plan) provides direction for development of 1,832 acres of land within the City of Lincoln. The Specific Plan identifies land use designations and zoning for the plan area, the circulation system, utilities systems, parks and open space, and other planning considerations. In addition, the Specific Plan includes a wide range of goals and policies, design guidelines and development standards that would guide development within Village 1.

T
he City certified an Environmental Impact Report for the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2010102018), adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the Specific Plan on November 27, 2012. In 2013, revisions to the Specific Plan and an addendum were adopted to address changes to the Oak Tree Lane connection to Sierra College Boulevard and provision of an additional elementary school site. In 2015, 1,712 acres of the Village 1 Specific Plan were annexed into the City.

Approximately 120 acres of the adopted Specific Plan were not included in the annexation due to opposition of the property owners. In March 2020, the Specific Plan was revised, and rezoning was adopted for a portion of the plan area known as Turkey Creek Estates, which occupies 248 acres on the eastern side of the plan area, north of McBean Park Drive. The amendments reduced the amount of land designated Village Country Estates (VCE) and increased the amount of Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) acreage within the northern portion of the Turkey Creek Estates project . This resulted in a reduction of 128 VCE units and a corresponding increase of 128 VLDR units. Parks acreage was also reduced slightly, and there was an increase in the amount of open space. The total amount of developable acreage within the Specific Plan was unchanged. In September 2023, the City Council approved another amendment to the Village 1 Specific Plan, realigning Oak Tree Lane and making minor modifications to the land use plan. As a result, the total number of residential units was reduced to 5,610 from 5,639.

T
he Parkwood project is proposed for Village 1 Planning Areas (PA) 27A, 27C, 65D and 70. The Parkwood project would make minor changes to the boundaries of the land use designations for Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR) and Village Park/Recreation (VPR) (see Figure 4 below).

T
he California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15163 state that a lead agency or responsible agency may prepare a Supplement to an EIR if any of the conditions described in Section 15162 for a Subsequent EIR are present, and if only minor additions or changes to the previous EIR are necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation. The following are conditions contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would apply to the preparation of a Subsequent EIR:

1. S
ubstantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;

2. S
ubstantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which would require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or

3. N
ew information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was c
ertified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:

EXHIBIT A
413

The Parkwood Project Addendum
September 2025
2 a) The project would have new or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;

b) Significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;

c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more signif icant effects of the project, but the proposed proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or

d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adapt the mitigation measure or alternative.

If there are some changes to the project, or if additional information is needed, but none of the above criteria are met, then the Lead Agency may prepare an addendum (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164).

This addendum evaluates whether the Parkwood project is fully and adequately addressed by the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, as most recently modified and certified. For the reasons discussed below, the proposed Parkwood project would not result in new significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of environmental impacts identified in the Village 1 EIR. As discussed below, the proposed changes to land use acreages would not substantially increase any impacts identified in the EIR. The discussion in this Addendum focuses on impacts that were found to be significant, with or without mitigation, in the Village 1 EIR and/or for which the proposed Parkwood project would result in a substantial change in the severity of an impact (either reducing or increasing the severity).

ROJECT OVERVIEW
The Parkwood project provides for 122 medium density residential units, associated infrastructure and

4.2 acres of parks on approximately 21 acres located within the Village 1 Specific Plan area within the City of Lincoln.

Project Location
The project site is located in the City of Lincoln south of McBean Park Drive within the Village 1 Specific Plan (see Figures 1 and 2). The Assessor’s Parcel Number is 021-274-071-000. The project site is bounded by the Placer County corporation yard and former gun range and missile site to the west, undeveloped properties to the north and east, including the proposed Leavell Ranch project, and the Hidden Hills subdivision to the south. The Oak Tree Lane extension is under construction and bounds the southern border of the project site.

The VPR-zoned portion of the parcel at the northern edge of the property contains a portion of a large pond that is intended to be incorporated into a regional park when the Specific Plan is fully developed.

There are a number of existing structures on the project site associated with a vacant rural residence, including a burned home site, large metal outbuilding, garage, sheds, bridges and hardscape. These home site dates from the 1990s. None of the structures are occupied or maintained at this time and would all be removed during site preparation for the proposed project.

Proposed Project Components
A total of 122 residential units are proposed on 15.8 acres. All units would be medium density, with an overall average density of 7.7 units per acre, which is consistent with the VMDR designation.

The proposed project also includes two parks – including a portion of the regional park site that will be

EXHIBIT A
414

The Parkwood Project Addendum
September 2025
3 dedicated to the City – occupying a total of 4.2 acres and approximately 0.40 acres of landscape corridors.

The layout of the proposed project is shown in Figure 3.

The proposed project would develop the project site with land uses and densities that are consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. The acreage for each use would vary slightly from the adopted Specific Plan, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 4. In addition, parcel boundaries would be modified slightly, including the boundaries for the VPR parcels. As a result, there would be an increase of 1.4 acres of parks and recreation acreage, an increase of 85 percent for the project site. The amount of acreage for residential uses would be reduced by approximately 1.4 acres, or about 8 percent.

Table 1
Land Use Comparison
Land Use/Zone Adopted Specific
Plan Acreage
Proposed
Acreage
Difference
Village Medium Density
Residential (VMDR)

17.2 15.8 -1.4
Village Parks and Recreation
(VPR)

2.8 4.2 +1.4
Landscape Corridor (Village
Open Space)

0.4 0.4 0
Rights-of-Way 0.5 0.5 0
Total 20.9 20.9 0

The 122 residences built within the project site would be single or two story. All units would be single family. Lots would range from 29 to 135 feet in width (most lots would be 40-45 feet wide) and 78 to 142 feet in depth. Lot sizes would range from 3,238 square feet to 8,586 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,174 square feet.

Circulation
Primary access to the project site would be provided by Silverado Trail, a new collector street proposed north of Oak Tree Lane and west of the project site. Silverado Trail would be constructed adjacent to but outside of the project boundaries through an agreement with the adjacent landowner. Silverado Trail would have two 11 -foot travel lanes. Separated sidewalks, bike/NEV lanes and planters would be provided on either side of the roadway.

Ultimately, Silverado Trail is intended to be extended farther north in order to provide access to the planned Regional Park west of the project site in the future.

Secondary access would be provided by a connection to the extension of Oak Tree Lane currently under construction as part of the Hidden Hills subdivision to the south. Oak Tree Lane adjacent to the project site is planned to have single travel lanes in each direction and a 13-foot median, with bike/NEV lanes, separated sidewalks and masonry sound walls on each side.

Internal streets would have two travel lanes and either separated or adjacent sidewalks. An east-west roadway connection would also be provided to the adjacent property project to the east. No trails are proposed to be built with this project.

EXHIBIT A
415
The Parkwood Project Addendum
S eptember 2025
4 proposed project’s utility lines will connect to the lines in Oak Tree Lane. The utilities within Oak Tree Lane are currently being constructed and are anticipated to be complete prior to buildout of the proposed project. The proposed project is intended to be served entirely by gravity flow. As an alternative, a lift station may be installed in Silverado Trail if necessary in order to make the sewer system work efficiently.

P
roject stormwater runoff would be conveyed to the northern park site, entering the existing swales and flowing into the pond in the northwest corner of the project site, and from there to the larger pond to the north. Silverado Trail would be captured in storm drain lines within the road. The northern portion would connect to the project storm drain system; the southern portion would discharge to the system within Oak Tree Lane.

Ot
her
Temporary construction easements (CE’s) are proposed outside of the project site. CE’s are proposed west of the project site within the Regional Park site, and north of the project site within an area designated Village High Density Residential (VHDR). Another CE is proposed east of the project site within a portion of Leavell Ranch designated VMDR. Development of this area was addressed in the CEQA Addendum prepared for the Leavell Ranch project prior to its recent approval.

T
he intent of these easements is to allow some grading offsite to conform to grading on the adjacent parcels. At this time, the only project that is anticipated to be constructed in the same timeframe as the proposed project is Leavell Ranch to the east. Similar to Leavell Ranch, development on the parcels to the west and north would be subject to CEQA prior to any ground disturbance. Therefore, the temporary construction easements are not addressed further in this Addendum.

T
he applicant intends to transfer some density from the project site to another project (Stardust 12), under the same ownership, in the eastern portion of Village 1. The construction of the Parkwood project is not contingent on development of the Stardust 12 project that would receive the density transfer, and the City will not be approving the transfer as part of the Parkwood project approvals. The environmental impacts of increasing the density on the Stardust 12 project will be addressed as part of the CEQA analysis for that project, and the City will then decide whether to approve the transfer.

Therefore, the density transfer is not addressed further in this Addendum.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Aesthetics and Visual Quality
The Village 1 EIR found that changes in the visual character of the plan area would be a significant and unavoidable impact due to the conversion of open views of agricultural land and oak woodlands to an urban and suburban development (Impact 4.1-2). The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations documenting that the benefits of the Specific Plan outweighed the environmental effects, including changes in visual quality. The EIR also found that the introduction of lighting into the plan area would be mitigated to a less -than-significant level with mitigation requiring that all light standards be shielded and directed downward (Impact 4.1-3).

T
he proposed Parkwood project would not substantially alter the visual impacts identified in the Specific Plan. The project site is not visible from any existing roadways, but would be visible from other development within Village 1, including from the Oak Tree Lane extension. Project development would comply with the Village 1 Specific Plan Design Guidelines, and would be compatible with other Village 1 development.

T
he project site is not visible from a scenic highway, existing public gathering areas (e.g., parks) or roadways, or from existing residential areas. Therefore, the development would not alter existing, publicly-accessible views, so no new visual impacts would occur.

EXHIBIT A
416

The Parkwood Project Addendum
September 2025
5 The proposed project would introduce new sources of light ; however, compliance with Mitigation Measure 4.1-3 (shielding light fixtures and directing them downward) will ensure that the impact is not more severe than indicated in the Village 1 EIR.

Impacts Associated with Ground Disturbance
The proposed project propos al would not alter the amount of Open Space or the acreage to be disturbed within the Village 1 Specific Plan area. Therefore, as discussed in more detail below, impacts related to ground disturbance, such as loss of biological habitat and generation of dust, would be essentially the same as those identified in the Village 1 EIR.

The proposed project identifies one offsite improvement—the partial construction of Silverado Trail west of the project site. Silverado Trail would be a roadway that provides access to the proposed project, and ultimately, to the Regional Park west of the project site. This park access is shown in the Village 1 Specific Plan, and was therefore considered in the Village 1 EIR at a programmatic level.

Because this area was assumed to be developed in the Village 1 Specific Plan and EIR, it would not increase the area of disturbance for the Specific Plan as a whole, nor increase the impacts associated with ground disturbance.

Agriculture
The site is designated “Farmland of Local Importance” on the Important Farmland map 1, which is not
considered Important Farmland, and is not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, development of the project site would not result in the substantial loss of agricultural resources (Impacts 4.2-1 and

4.2-2).

Biological Resources
A Biological Resources Assessment and an Aquatic Resources Delineation Report were prepared for the project site. Surveys were conducted of the project site and the temporary construction easements, which include the Silverado Trail alignment. Like much of the Village 1 plan area as a whole, the Parkwood project site consists primarily of non-native annual grassland and oak woodland. The project site also contains previously developed areas, including an approximately one- acre rural residential site and a road.2

The project site also contains a total of 1.032 acres of wetlands and other waters; an additional .00022 acres of seasonal wetlands are located offsite, in the Silverado Trail alignment . 3 An approximately

0.741-acre pond is located in the northwest corner of the project site. 4 This pond drains to a large pond located north of the project site.

There are three seasonal wetlands located in the eastern portion of the project site, totaling 0.036 acres.5 In addition, there are two seasonal wetlands swales, totaling 0.255 acres, that convey storm water runoff and flow east to west into the pond.6

There are also two seasonal wetlands located in the northern portion of Silverado Trail that would be constructed to provide access to the project site. 7 These seasonal wetlands, totaling 0.0022 acres, are located in an upland ditch that is no longer used to convey water, and do not appear to receive enough runoff to flow to the ditch that flows into the pond. 8 The applicant is requesting a Preliminary

1 California Important Farmland Map, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/, accessed June 27, 2025. 2 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, Table 2. 3 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, March 2025, Attachment B. 4 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, March 2025, Attachment B. 5 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, March 2025, Attachment B. 6 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, March 2025, page 6. 7 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, Figure 5. 8 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, March 2025, page 5.

EXHIBIT A
417
The Parkwood Project Addendum
S eptember 2025
6 Jurisdictional Determination for the wetlands on the project site.9 T
he project site does not contain any stream systems, mapped 100-year floodplains, or vernal pools.10 T
here is a high probability that one special-status species could use nesting and foraging habitat within the project site: white-tail kite.11 The project site provides moderate potential habitat for a number of special-status species. Woolly rose-mallow, a special -status plant, could occur in the fringes of the pond, rock walls and/or the bridge footings of one of the wetland swales. Other special -status plant species, specifically Ahart’s dwarf rush, Legenere and Sanford’s arrowhead, could occur within wetlands and wetland swale edges. Vegetation adjacent to the pond could provide nesting habitat for tri-colored blackbird. The annual grassland and oak savannah also provide suitable habitat for grasshopper sparrow and Swainson’s hawk.12
T
here is a low probability that the following special-status plant species could occur on site. Big-scale balsam root could occur within annual grasslands and oak savannah. Spicate rosinweed could occur in rock out crops and granite piles. Dwarf downingia and pincushion naverretia could occur within seasonal wetlands and swales. Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop could occur in seasonal wetlands or the margins of the pond. Brazilian watermeal could occur in the pond.13 A
nimal species with a low probability of occurring include v ernal pool fairy shrimp and western spadefoot, which could use seasonal wetlands and swales. Bird species with some, but low, probability of occurring on site include burrowing owl, bald eagle and California black rail. Limited small willows and cottonwoods found within the project site could provide roosting habitat for one special-status bat species—western red bat, which is a State species of special concern. However, it is typically found in riparian areas (which would not be affected by the project), and no occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. For these reasons, there is a low likelihood of this species occurring within the project site.14 The pond and the surrounding upland areas could provide habitat for western pond turtle.15
N
o elderberry shrubs, which provide habitat for the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle, were identified during surveys of the project site.16
W
ith the exception of the pond, the Parkwood project would replace the natural habitats with residential development, streets, recreational uses and associated facilities. The loss of biological resources would be similar to the impacts assumed under the Specific Plan as adopted, because the proposed project would develop the same amount of acreage. The conversion of approximately 20 acres to urban uses, plus the acreage for the Silverado Trail, would result in a loss of wetlands and wetland species, including vernal pool fairy shrimp and western spadefoot (Impacts 4.1 -1, 4.4-2, 4.4-15 and

4.4-17 of the EIR), the potential loss of special -status plant species habitat (Impact 4.4- 3), potential loss of western pond turtle and/or degradation of its habitat (Impact 4.4-4), the loss of oak woodlands (Impact 4.4 -14), and the potential disturbance for nesting and/or foraging habitat for several bird species (Impacts 4.4-5 through 4.4-8, 4.4-10 and 4.4-16). The Village 1 EIR anticipated development of this area, so the loss of biological resources would not result in new or substantially more sever e impacts on biological resources.
9 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, March 2025, page 6. 10 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, pages 14 and

16. 11 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, Table 5. 12 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, Table 5. 13 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, Table 5. 14 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Bat Habitat Assessment, Parkwood Lincoln, July 15, 2025, Page 4. 15 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, Table 5. 16 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Parkwood Property, July 2025, page 16.

EXHIBIT A
418

The Parkwood Project Addendum
September 2025
7 The Village 1 EIR identified mitigation measures that would reduce impacts on biological resources to a less-than-significant level. These measures included rare plants, western pond turtle, vernal pool crustacean and nesting bird prior to initiation of ground disturbance, ensuring no net loss of wetland resources (which can be achieved through the US Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit), and compensation for loss of oak woodlands. Since the Village 1 Specific Plan was originally adopted, Placer County prepared and adopted the Placer County Conservation Plan (PCCP), which addresses many of the special-status species and habitats that are identified in the Village 1 EIR. In 2020, The City of Lincoln adopted the PCCP and made findings that the PCCP EIS/EIR adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the PCCP, including the environmental effects of future development .

The City’s adoption of the PCCP requires that development projects participate in the PCCP in order to mitigate the effects on those species addressed by PCCP and that would be adversely affected by the project development. Therefore, Village 1 mitigation measures addressing species covered by the PCCP have been supplanted by the requirement to comply with the PCCP.

Therefore, in lieu of implementing the biological resources mitigation measures, the Parkwood applicant must pay fees to the Placer County Conservation Plan (PCCP) for those species and habitats covered by the PCCP. The PCCP is a regional, comprehensive program intended to protect, enhance, and restore natural resources in western Placer County, while streamlining permitting for urban development. The PCCP includes three program components:

• The Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan, a joint habitat conservation plan and natural community conservation plan (HCP/NCCP) that would protect fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats and fulfill the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), and the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (NCCPA).
• The Western Placer County Aquatic Resources Program (CARP) that would protect streams, wetlands, and other water resources and fulfill the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and analogous state laws and regulations.
• The Western Placer County In- Lieu Fee Program (ILF Program) that fulfills compensatory mitigation requirements under Section 404 of the CWA.
17 The PCCP encompasses approximately 270,000 acres in western Placer County, including the City of Lincoln. It addresses a wide range of habitat and species, including several species each of fish, invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Most of the special-status species that could occur within the project site are covered by the PCCP, including Swainson’s hawk, western pond turtle, California black rail, tricolored blackbird, vernal pool crustaceans, and Valley elderberry longhorn beetle.
18 The PCCP is also designed to provide for conservation of landscapes and natural communities through establishment of a reserve system, stream protection measures, and wetland conservation with no net loss of wetland values or function. For example, the loss of oak woodlands and/or wetlands could be mitigated through payment of the PCCP fee, which would be used to preserve and/or enhance areas with these habitats.

For those habitats or species that are not covered by the PCCP, a project would need to implement the applicable CEQA mitigation. In the case of the Parkwood project, five plant species have low to moderate potential to occur on sit – Woolly rose-mallow, Ahart’s dwarf rush, Legenere, Sanford’s arrowhead and Brazilian watermeal – and the PCCP does not address these plants. Therefore, the project would still need to implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-3, which addresses rare plant species.

Note that the Brazilian watermeal would only occur in the pond, which would be undisturbed by the

17 Placer County, Placer County Conservation Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, May 2020, Table 2-11, page 1-1.
18 Placer County, Placer County Conservation Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, May 2020, Table 2-11, page 2-39.

EXHIBIT A
419
The Parkwood Project Addendum
S eptember 2025
8 project. Mitigation Measures 4.4-13, which addresses ambient light affecting wildlife, would also need to be implemented even if the applicant paid the PCCP fee.

A
lthough the likelihood of special -status bats occurring on the project site is low, the following mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce the less-than-significant impact on bat species:

Mitigation Measure 4.4-12(c)
If construction commences after July 2026, a qualified biologist shall conduct a bat habitat assessment as described. If roosting bats are discovered, the measures identified on pages 4 and 5 of the Bat Habitat Assessment (July 2025) prepared by Madrone Ecological Consulting in order to protect roosting bats.

C
ultural and Paleontological Resources
At the time that the Village 1 EIR was prepared, only portions of the plan area had been surveyed for cultural resources. Mitigation Measures 4.5-1 and 4.5-2 require that surveys for historically significant and archaeological resources be conducted for those areas that had not been previously surveyed. In addition, for those resources that had been previously identified, they should be evaluated for eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NHRP) and California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR).

A
s required by Mitigation Measures 4.5- 1 and 4.5-2, in 2024, ECORP Consulting, Inc. prepared an evaluation of cultural resources located within the project site, including a records search and a field survey of the entire project site, the Silverado Trail alignment that would serve the project and the temporary construction easements.
19 No prehistoric features were identified.20
S
everal buildings associated with a rural residence, including a garage and outbuildings, are present within the Project Area. The burned remains of a residence are located to the west of the garage and outbuildings. According to a review of aerial photographs and topographic maps, the buildings date from the 1990s. O ne building is first depicted on the 1992 topographic map, with the remaining buildings being visible on the 1995 aerial photograph.21 Because the buildings on the project site are less than 45 years old, they would not be considered historically significant (Impact 4.5-1).

A
lthough the site survey did not identify any cultural resources within the project site, there is the possibility that subsurface resources could be present. Construction activities, particularly grading and excavation, could damage or destroy such resources if they are present. Mitigation Measure 4.5- 3 requires that a preconstruction training be provided to construction workers regarding the potential to find unanticipated cultural resources. In addition, Mitigation Measure 4.5- 3 requires that if a cultural resource is discovered during construction, all activities within 100 feet of the find must cease until an archaeologist, and if the find is prehistoric, a representative of the tribe can examine the find. It also requires appropriate treatment of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources that are discovered.

Additional requirements for treatment of human remains are provided in Mitigation Measure 4.5-4.

M
itigation Measures 4.5-3 and 4.5-4 would ensure that the resources are protected from harm , evaluated, and handled by qualified individuals.

Tribal Cultural Resources
19 ECORP Consulting, Inc., Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Parkwood Project Property, October 2024. 20 ECORP Consulting, Inc., Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Parkwood Project Property, October 2024, page 34.
21 ECORP Consulting, Inc., Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Parkwood Project Property, October 2024, page 32.

EXHIBIT A
420

The Parkwood Project Addendum
September 2025
9 Although no prehistoric resources were identified within the project site, there could be resources present that are important to local tribes. Mitigation Measure 4.5- 2, as revised in September 2023, outlines the process for consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Village 1 plan area, and that requested notification pursuant to AB 52. The City notified the United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) of the proposed Parkwood project, and the shared the finding of the Cultural Resources Report that no prehistoric resources were identified during site surveys. At the time that this Addendum was prepared, consultation with the tribe was closed on October 10, 2025.

Hazardous Materials
The EIR identified several potential impacts due to potential contamination, including exposure to soil or groundwater contamination due to past agricultural and other uses (Impacts 4.7-2 and 4.7-4), and/or lead-based paint and asbestos in structures to be demolished (Impact 4.7-3). As required by Mitigation Measure 4.7-2, a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the Parkwood project and prior to approval of a specific development permit, any recommendations of the Phase 1 ESA be implemented.

The structures on the project site were constructed in the 1990s, after the use of lead paint and asbestos had been prohibited by law. Given their recent age, the demolition of those structures would not have the potential for exposure to asbestos , lead-based paint or PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls).
22 Review of various databases identified a number of sites within ½ to 1 mile of the Parkwood site that have been listed as involving hazardous materials. Of particular note, the Beale Air Force Titan missile facility, which was located on Oak Tree Lane, is located immediately west of the project site. The missile site is located within Village 1 on a parcel designated Village Park and Recreation (VPR).

Operations at the facility resulted in groundwater contaminated with several hazardous substances, including trichloroethylene (TCE) and benzene. The Village 1 EIR addressed hazardous materials impacts resulting from the abandoned Titan missile base. The Parkwood project site is adjacent to the former missile site parcel; however, the project is not located on parcels that are directly affected by the abandoned missile base. According to Wallace Kuhl’s review of groundwater studies prepared for the missile site, affected groundwater does not extend under the project site . 23 In addition, ENGEO
collected soil gas samples to determine if the project site had been affected by contaminants emanating from the missile base site. Analysis of the samples included benzene, total petroleum hydrocarbons and TCE. TCE, the primary constituent of concern for the former missile site, was not reported above the laboratory detection limit .
24 Based on the levels of these constituents that were found in site soils , the Phase 1 ESA concluded that the project site is suitable for residential development.25

Other hazards sites in proximity to the project site include the former Placer County Corporation Yard, which contained a shooting range, and a fire station that contained leaking underground storage tanks that require no further action, would not negatively affect the project site. 26 A Soil Remediation Work
Plan has been prepared for remediation of the lead located on the shooting range site, and Placer County has secured a consultant to undertake the remediation.27

A reconnaissance of the project site was conducted, including the residential site. No evidence of

22 ENGEO Incorporated, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, August 2, 2024, page 13. 23 Wallace Kuhl & Associates, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Parkwood Subdivision, Oak Tree Lane, Lincoln, Placer County, California, August 22, 2022, page 17. 24 ENGEO Incorporated, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, August 2, 2024, page 6. 25 ENGEO Incorporated, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, August 2, 2024, page 6. 26 ENGEO Incorporated, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, August 2, 2024, page 8. 27 Steve Newsom, Director of Facilities Management, Placer County, memorandum to the Board of Supervisors, June 10, 2025.

EXHIBIT A
421
The Parkwood Project Addendum
S eptember 2025
10 contamination was identified. Several decaying 55- gallon drums were present. These w ere marked “motor oil” but little or no liquid was found in the drums, and there was no evidence of residual liquid, leakage or soil staining. Nonetheless, the Phase 1 ESA recommends that the drums be removed by a licensed professional.28 As noted above, Mitigation Measure 4.7-2 requires that recommendations provided in the Phase 1 ESA must be implemented.

B
ecause the Village 1 EIR anticipated the historic uses within the plan area, including the Parkwood project site, and there are no identified contaminants that would affect human health or the environment, the Parkwood project would not alter the severity of impacts related to hazardous materials.

H
ydrology and Water Quality
The amount of acreage that would be developed under the proposed project would be consistent with the Village 1 EIR assumptions. As a result, the proposed project would generate a similar amount stormwater runoff. The introduction of approximately 20 acres of development could increase flood volumes requiring storage (Impacts 4.8-1, 4.8-2, 4.8-7 and 4.8-9), as well as the potential degradation of stormwater runoff due to erosion and/or urban contaminants (Impacts 4.8-4, 4.8-5 and 4.8-9). The mitigation measures identified in Section 4.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, would be required of the Parkwood project, and would be adequate to reduce impacts related to water quality, flooding and hydrology to a less-than-significant level.

Land Use
The Parkwood project would not alter the potential for land use conflicts within the plan area because the same types and intensities of uses as provided for in the Specific Plan would be developed (Impact

4.9-1). There would not be, for example, a substantial change in the types of land uses within the project site, or the allowable residential densities and/or commercial square footage.

T
here are agricultural use s in the i mmediate vicinity of the project site. For the most part, lands adjacent to the project site are used for rural residential and low-intensity agriculture, such as grazing.

However, those uses are planned to be replaced by other Village 1 development. After buildout of the Specific Plan, the project site would not be adjacent to any agricultural or rural land. Therefore, there would not be a conflict between the project and agricultural uses.

Noise
At present, there are no existing residences within or adjacent to the project site. However, the City has recently approved several projects within Village 1, including two that are adjacent to the proposed project – the Hidden Hills subdivision to the southwest and the Leavell Ranch project to the east.

Homes within the subdivisions could be constructed prior to project construction. If that is the case, residents of these areas could be subjected to heavy equipment and other noise due to project construction. Mitigation Measure 4.10-2 would reduce impacts associated with construction activities to a less -than-significant level by li miting construction hours, locating staging areas away from residential areas, muffling construction equipment and notifying residents within 300 feet of the project site when construction would occur. Because the proposed project would not alter the area being developed, this measure would continue to be adequate to address project construction.

T
he proposed project would not alter traffic generated by the Village 1 plan area, so there would b e no change in future traffic noise levels (Impacts 4.10- 1 and 4.10-4). As shown in Village 1 Draft EIR Table 4.10-12, the 60 dBA Ldn contour would be approximately 207 feet from the centerline of Oak Tree Lane.29 Residents within these contours could be exposed to exterior and interior noise levels that exceed C ity standards. Mitigation Measure 4.10-5(a) requires that one or more measures be 28 ENGEO Incorporated, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, August 2, 2024, page 11. 29 C ity of Lincoln, Draft Environmental Impact for the Village 1 Specific Plan, May 2012, Table 4.10-2.

EXHIBIT A
422

The Parkwood Project Addendum
September 2025
11 included to reduce noise levels for residences in areas where the external noise levels would exceed 60 dBA Ldn, such as noise barriers, windows with a minimum sound rating of 32 and no exterior wall cavities. Sound walls are proposed to be constructed along Oak Tree Lane, including the portion adjacent to the project site, and along and the portion of Silverado Trail adjacent to the project site.

These measures would ensure that project residents would not be exposed to unacceptable traffic noise levels.

Traffic, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Traffic
Since the Specific Plan was adopted, the CEQA Guidelines have been revised to shift the analysis of traffic impacts from Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). After July 1, 2020, EIRs must analyze a project’s effect on VMT, and LOS can no longer be used as a standard of significance for CEQA purposes. The Village 1 Specific Plan EIR did not address VMT , because LOS was the standard of significance used to evaluate traffic impacts at that time. While changes in level of service are no longer evaluated under CEQA, the City does have General Plan policies that address LOS.

Because the Parkwood project would not increase the number or distribution of units within the Village 1 plan area, the project would not change the amount of traffic. Consequently, the proposed Parkwood project would not alter the conclusions of the EIR with respect to levels of service; therefore, no changes in the size or nature of roadway infrastructure would be needed. Further, it would not increase the number of vehicle miles traveled associated with the Specific Plan (Section 14 of the Draft EIR).

In addition, as required by Mitigation Measure 4.14 -7, the Parkwood project would contribute its fair share toward the funding of improvements identified as mitigation.

The Village 1 Specific Plan EIR also analyzed the effects of the Specific Plan on transit demand (Impact 4.14-5) and pedestrian, bicycle and NEV vehicle use (Impact 4.14- 6). No changes to the provision of transit, bicycle/NEV lanes or pedestrian facilities are proposed by the Parkwood project.

Bike/NEV lanes and sidewalks would be provided on the portion of Oak Tree Lane through constructed by the project; therefore, these impacts would continue to be less than significant under the proposed project.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction activities would generate dust and construction vehicle emissions (Impact 4.3- 1).

Project construction would comply with Mitigation Measure 4.3-1, which requires dust control and other measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction. The proposed project would not increase the amount of acreage that could be developed, so there would be no change in the amount of emissions generated during construction. Therefore, the short -term significant and unavoidable impact due to construction emissions would not be more severe than identified in the Village 1 EIR.

Motor vehicle use is one of the major sources of both air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.

The proposed Parkwood project would not alter the total number of dwelling units or the amount of commercial development within the Village 1 plan area. Therefore, the amount of vehicle and other emissions generated would be consistent with the EIR assumptions, and the conclusions of the EIR would not change (Impacts 4.3-2, 4.3-3, 4.3-5, 4.3-6 and 4.6-1).

Public Services and Utilities

Parks and Open Space
New development within Lincoln is required to provide both preserved open space and traditional parks. The Village 1 Specific Plan includes 40% of open space (732.8 acres), which is consistent with the General Plan open space requirement. In reviewing the appropriate amount of park land within a development project, the City considers the amount of parkland anticipated in the

EXHIBIT A
423
The Parkwood Project Addendum
S eptember 2025
12 Village 1 Specific Plan, the General Plan park standards and the unique characteristics of the individual project.

T
he City of Lincoln General Plan establishes a standard of 3 acres of Neighborhood Park, 3 acres of open space and 3 acres of citywide parks per 1,000 residents within any project that is approved subject to a Development Agreement, which is required for this project. The Village 1 Specific Plan adjusted the requirement for neighborhood parks to 2.43 acres per 1,000 residents due to the large amount of open space provided within Village 1.30 The Village 1 Specific Plan establishes the household population (number of persons expected per household) for various residential densities. The assumed household population of medium density residential development is 2.8 persons per household for medium density residential development.31 Given that the project proposes a maximum of 122 medium density homes, the Parkwood project is projected to have approximately 341 residents at build out. Therefore, the Parkwood project would be required to provide for 1 acre of open space, 1 acre of regional park and

0.83 acres of neighborhood park.

T
he project’s obligation for .83 acres of neighborhood parks will be met through the development of approximately 1.5 acres of parkland on the project site. The obligation for one acre of regional park will be partially met through dedication of 2.7 acres of parkland in the northwest corner of the project site; this area is designated to become part of the regional park. In addition, the proposed project would be subject to park fees as required by Mitigation Measure 4.12- 7. These fees would off -set the
cost of constructing the neighborhood/community parks planned within the Village 1 plan area, which could include developing the remainder of the lakefront in the western portion of the Specific Plan area.

T
he project’s obligation for one acre of open space is met though the designation of open space throughout Village 1. The proposed project would not increase the demand for open space beyond the level identified in the Specific Plan. Approximately 40 percent of the Village 1 area is designated Open Space, and the proposed project would not alter that amount.

T
he EIR found that the impacts on other public services would be less than significant, which would continue to be the case under the proposed Parkwood project.

Ot
her Public Services and Utilities
The Village 1 EIR found that the increased demand for law enforcement, fire protection and public schools would not result in significant environmental effects (Impacts 4.12- 1 through 4.12- 6). The Parkwood project would not alter the number of residenti al units, commercial square footage or residents within Village 1 at buildout, so these impacts would remain less than significant.

T
he Village 1 Specific Plan area, including the project site, is in an area designated Moderate on the CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones mapping, and is therefore not considered at substantial risk of wildfire.32
S
imilarly, because the Parkwood project would not alter the total number of residential units or commercial square footage within the Village 1 plan area, and would install infrastructure needed to serve both the project and future Village 1 development, there would be no change in demand for water supply, and generation of wastewater, energy and solid waste (Impacts 4.13-1 through 4.13- 12).
30 Frayji Design Group, Inc., Village 1 Infrastructure and Facilities Financing Plan (Financing Plan), Volume 2, Infrastructure and Phasing Plan, April 9, 2016, page 32 and Appendix 26. 31 City of Lincoln, Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Village 1 Specific Plan, May 2012, page 4.12-19. 32 CAL FIRE, City of Lincoln-Placer County, Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones, January 22, 2025.

EXHIBIT A
424
The Parkwood Project Addendum
S eptember 2025
13 CONCLUSION
As indicated in the above analysis, the proposed Parkwood project would not result in a new significant impact or an impact that is substantially more severe than what was identified in the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, and no revisions to the EIR, including mitigation measures, are necessary to address the impacts of the project. Therefore, the proposed Parkwood would not result in any conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required.

EXHIBIT A
425
193
FER
DEL
RAN
RD

WEBB BLVD

MCBEAN PARK DRIVE

PROJECT
SITE
RARI
CH
OAK
TREE

LANE STARDUST LANE

LOCATION MAP
nts
Figure 1: Project Location

EXHIBIT A
426
Figure 2: Surrounding Land Uses

EXHIBIT A
427
4,946 SF
5,303 SF
7,435 SF
7,352 SF
3,655 SF
3,655 SF
3,655 SF
4,271 SF
3,978 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,591 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
119,975 SF
5,268 SF
5,826 SF
4,709 SF
3,645 SF
4,028 SF
3,734 SF
3,485 SF
3,563 SF
4,002 SF
4,211 SF
3,858 SF
4,208 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,403 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
4,514 SF
3,400 SF
5,447 SF4,206 SF4,073 SF4,687 SF
7,158 SF
4,588 SF
3,665
SF3,668
SF
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
3233343536
3750
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62 63 64
44 43
42 41403938
49 48
47 4546
656667
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
122
121
120
119
118117116115114113
96 97 112 111
110
109
108
107
106
98 99
100
101
102
103 104 105
1 85'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
37'
109'
89'
125'
54'
88'
38'
12'
85'
40'
85'
32'
85'
40'
40'
91' 44'
92'
44'
85'
40'25'
83'
74'
97'
52'
53'
88'
88'40'
40'
53'
82'
80'
85'
40'
40'44'
79'
49'
85'
85'
45'
46'
167'
165'
85'
40'
78'
65'
85'
44'
72'
20'36'
40'
87'
46'
86'
81'
113'
85'
40'
40'
40'
85'
41'
85'
99'
60'
172'
56' 45'
37'
90'
156'
314'
169'
234'
39'
59'
85'
44'
44'
53'
40' 40'
84'
85'
40'
40'40'
40'
85'
41'
85'
45'
80'
128'
139'
82'
50'
87'
85'
44'
44'
406'
102'
41'
93'
42'
85'
40'
40'40'
40'
85'
41'
85'
45'
88'
94'
80'
89'
85'
44'
44'
83'
41'
98'
40'
40'
18'
85'
40'
40'
40'
85'
57'
90'
39'
113'
85'
44'
44'
45'
111'
102'
98'
42'
85'
40'
40'40'
40'
85'
53'
85'
84'
79'
30'
44'
85'
50'
50'
85'
44'
44'
45'
123'
95'
40'
53'
40'40'
40'
85'
94'
80'
41'
84'
85'
40'
40'
85'
44'
44'
45'
135'
25'
93'
40'
40'
40'
85'
89'
40'
90'
54'
42'
42'
84'
85'
40'
40'
50'
39' 49'
53'
80'
85'
40'40'
40'
85'
85'
43'
85'
88'
52'
53'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
53'
53'
53'
85'
43'
43'
85'
53'
75'
93'
103'
85'
40'
40'85'
40'
40'
55'
85'
40'
85'
40'
40'
95'
54'
89'
43'
43'
85'
116'
48'
98'
96'
32'
42'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
83' 86'
44'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
48'
80'
52'
93'
100'
32'
97'
40'
85'
40'
40'
85'
40'
40'
87'
40'
85'
40'
85'
40'
47'
84'
52' 142' 115'
32'
85'
40'
40'
40'
40'
89'
40'
40'
40'
70'
55'
84'
115'
32'
40'
41'
40'
92'
40'
40'
40'
50'
43'
86'
53'
44'
46'
53'
107'58'
68'
59'
44'
69' 47' 47' 47'
84'
53'
53'
85'
53'
85'
195'
97'
414'
25'
25'
25'
90'
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
3,738 SF
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
3,740 SF
4,216 SF
4,216 SF
4,209 SF
4,630 SF
4,524 SF
4,208 SF
3,713
SF 3,520
SF
42'
43'
3,304 SF
4,403 SF
4,305 SF 3,980 SF
3,516
SF
56'3,633 SF
4,516 SF
4,394 SF
3,912 SF
5,031 SF
64,855 SF
8,522 SF
6,261 SF
4,524 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
4,362 SF
4,358 SF
3,400 SF
3,400 SF
3,402 SF
7,139 SF
5,734 SF4,167 SF3,512
SF
8,586 SF 4,671 SF
3,238 SF
7,220 SF
7,788 SF
4,590 SF
4,383 SF
5,309 SF
3,625
SF
4,182 SF
4,194 SF3,526
SF
3,734 SF
3,400 SF
85'
41'
27'
31'
24'
17'
41'40'40'40'53'
40'
6'
85'85'
53'
45'
53'
41'
61'
51'
54'
40'
68'
135'
51'
42'
30'
57'
29'
29'
31'
93'
3,842 SF
3,439 SF
34'
4,514 SF
4,690
SF
3,654
SF3,660
SF
30' 31'
74'
10'
85'
38'
40'
40'

ROCK CANYON HOLDINGS LLC
021-274-035-000 ROCK CANYON HOLDINGS LLC
021-274-034-000

COUNTY OF PLACER
021-274-061-000

CENTURY COMMUNITIES

OF CALIFORNIA
021-274-068-000

LEAVELL
021-274-066-000

LEAVELL
021-274-065-000

LEAVELL
021-274-036-000

OAK TREE LANE

CENTURY COMMUNITIES

OF CALIFORNIA
021-274-069-000

STREET B

STREET C COURT C

COURT B

STREET D

STREET B
ST. D ST. C
STREET
44'
44'
44'
44'44'50'
44'
44'
44'44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
44'
R=250'
R=250'
R=840'
R=250'
56'
56'
A
R=300'
56'

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT 2018-0000479
(TO BE QUITCLAIMED)
I.O.D. EASEMENT P.U.E./M.U.E. 2017-
0090348 & 349 (TO BE ABANDONED)

IOD EASEMENT PUE
2022-0036585

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
2022-0036586

RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT 4 PM 56
(TO BE QUITCLAIMED

PRIOR TO FINAL MAP

ACCEPTANCE)

WLE EASEMENT
93-029292
(TO BE ABANDONED)
RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 1364.419
& 431 (TO BE QUITCLAIMED)

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
2017-0090347 (TO BE ABANDONED)
66'
55'
R=1,000'
55'
55'
R=500'

1.5 ± AC.

LOT A
PARK

2.7 ± AC.

LOT B
PARK
LOT D

LANDSCAPE

0.1 ± AC.

LOT F

LANDSCAPE

0.1 ± AC.

0.2 ± AC.

D
D
C
D
D
B
A

SILVERADO TRAIL
(122) 40'x80' (TYP.)

15.8 ± AC.

UNIT 1

PUBLIC UTILITY

EASEMENT

OVER LOT C
R=50'
R=50'
R=25'R=25'
R=25'
R=50'R=50'
R=50'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22' R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22' R=50'
R=50'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=30'
R=22'
R=26'
R=26'
LOT E

LANDSCAPE
R=26'
R=26'
R=50'
R=50'
LOT C

LANDSCAPE

0.0 ± AC.

12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)

12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)
R= 500'
R=500'
E
AREA "K"
4 PM 56
PARCEL "C" 4 PM 56
16 7
14 13
8 12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)
193
FER
DEL
RAN
RD

WEBB BLVD

MCBEAN PARK DRIVE

PROJECT
SITE
RARI
CH

OAKTREE
LANE

STARDUST LANE
55' RIGHT OF WAY

OAK TREE LANE
SCALE: NTS
A
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/L.S.E.

LANDSCAPE
MEDIAN
25'

MASONRY
WALL (TYP.)
8' 3' 13'11'7'

WALK TRAVEL LANE

27.5'
CLC
R/W
55'
6'
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/L.S.E.
25'
8' 3'11' 7'

WALKTRAVEL LANE

27.5'
R/W
6'
BIKE/

NEV LANE
BIKE/

NEV LANE
STREET
TREES (TYP.)

PLANTERPLANTERC/G C/GMEDIAN

MASONRY
WALL (TYP.)

PARKWOOD

SUBDIVISION
105'
(FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS

BY OTHERS)

12.5'
P.U.E.

SCALE: NTS

PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL (WITH ON-STREET PARKING)
56' RIGHT OF WAYC
6' 3' 15'4'

WALK PLANTER TRAVEL LANE
28'
6' 3'15' 4'

WALKPLANTERTRAVEL LANE
28'
CLC

R/W R/W
56'
STREET
TREES (TYP.)

MINOR RESIDENTIAL (WITH ON-STREET PARKING)
SCALE: NTS
44' RIGHT OF WAYD
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
15'3'
22'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALK TRAVEL LANE
15' 3'
22'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALKTRAVEL LANE
CLC

R/W R/W
44'

PARKING
(TYP.)

12.5'
P.U.E.

12.5'
P.U.E.C/G
C/G
C/G
C/G

PARKING
(TYP.)

PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL AT ENTRY
SCALE: NTS
50' RIGHT OF WAYE
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
18'3'
25'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALK TRAVEL LANE
18' 3'
25'

12.5'
P.U.E.
4'

WALKTRAVEL LANE
CLC

R/W R/W
50'
C/GC/G

PARKING
(TYP.)

ROLLED CURB
(TYP.)

LEAVELL
021-274-065-000

COURT C

COURT B
STREET
44'
44'
56'
A
R=300'
56'
EASEMENT 4 PM 56

1.5 ± AC.

LOT A
PARK

2.7 ± AC.

LOT B
VPR
D R=50'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22'
R=22' R=50'
R=50'

12.5' P.U.E. (TYP.)

0.1 ± AC.

LOT G

LANDSCAPE

SILVERADO TRAIL (FUTURE OFFSITE ROAD)
SCALE: NTS
42' PUBLIC STREET EASEMENTB
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
PSE
7' 11'3'
21'
5' 6'

TRAVEL LANEBIKE
LANE
PSE
7'11' 3'
21'
5'6'

TRAVEL LANEBIKE
LANE
20'

LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/
L.S.E.
20'

LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR/
L.S.E.

CLC
42'

C/G C/G

PARKWOOD

SUBDIVISION

WALK PLANTER PLANTERWALK
82'

MASONRY
WALL (TYP.)
(FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS

BY OTHERS)

12.5'
P.U.E.

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

PARKWOOD

CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 5, 2025

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP - PARKWOOD
100
200 0
NORTH400

PROJECT NOTES

LOCATION MAP

LOT LINES MAY BE ADJUSTED AT THE TIME OF FINAL MAP PROVIDED THAT NO ADDITIONAL LOTS ARE

CREATED AND RESULTING DESIGN IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP.
12) FINAL SUBDIVISION MAPPING SHALL BE PREPARED TO IDENTIFY ALL R/W, IOD, AND/OR PUBLIC/

RECORD OWNER
8861 PARKWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC
3824 SKYLINE ROAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
CONTACT: PAUL SEARS
PHONE: (818) 974-7126

APPLICANT/DEVELOPER
JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC
1478 STONE POINT DRIVE, SUITE 100
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
CONTACT: JOHN JEWETT
PHONE: (530) 550-5525

PLANNER/ENGINEER
WOOD RODGERS INC.
3741 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 150
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
CONTACT:

PLANNER: VANCE JONES
ENGINEER: JASON REED, PE C66631
PHONE: (916) 341-7760

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
021-274-071
AREA

20.9± ACRES GROSS

RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZES
AVERAGE: 4,174 SQ. FT.

MAXIMUM: 8,586 SQ. FT.

MINIMUM: 3,238 SQ. FT.

NUMBER OF LOTS
122 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS
2 PARK LOTS
4 LANDSCAPE LOTS
128 LOTS TOTAL

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)

PARKS & RECREATION (PR)

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)

PARKS & RECREATION (PR)

EXISTING ZONING

VILLAGE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VMDR)

VILLAGE PARKS & RECREATION (VPR)

PROPOSED ZONING

VILLAGE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VMDR)

VILLAGE PARKS & RECREATION (VPR)

PARKS & RECREATION

CITY OF LINCOLN

POLICE & FIRE PROTECTION

CITY OF LINCOLN

SCHOOL DISTRICT

WESTERN PLACER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
SEWER

CITY OF LINCOLN

STORM DRAIN

CITY OF LINCOLN
WATER

CITY OF LINCOLN

ELECTRICITY
PG&E
GAS
PG&E
SHEET 1 OF 3

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3741 Douglas Blvd, Suite 150Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767 Roseville, CA 95661
1" = 40'
DETAIL A:

FIT TEMPLATE AT SETBACKS

STREET D
61 62 63 64
60 46 45
656667
59 68
1" = 100'

ALTERNATIVE WITH

NO ACCESS ROAD TO EAST

THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS BASED

ON THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED

IN THE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT ISSUED BY

PLACER TITLE COMPANY, REPORT NUMBER
P-611272, DATED DECEMBER 3, 2024. ALL

EASEMENTS SHOWN IN THE REPORT ARE

SHOWN HEREON OR IF AN EASEMENT IS

NOT PLOTTABLE OR BLANKET, A NOTE TO
THAT EFFECT IS SHOWN HEREON. ANY

PUBLIC EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED
ARE SHOWN AS "TO BE ABANDONED WITH
THE FINAL MAP" (IF APPLICABLE).

SURVEYOR'S

STATEMENT
NORTH
NORTH

INDICATES

REPORT ITEM
NUMBER
XX
13 14
15 18
17 16
10 7
6 5
4 12/31/2025
09/05/2025
NOTE:

REFER TO SHEET 3 FOR

ALTERNATE PROVIDING

DRAIN CONNECTION AND

OVERLAND RELEASE TO

SERVE RUNOFF FORM HTE
LEAVELL PROPERTY.

FROM THE
Figure 3: Project Layout

EXHIBIT A
428

LAND USE ADJUSTMENTS

PARKWOOD TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
A PORTION OF PARCEL PA 27 IN THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN

CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 25, 2025

LAND USE ADJUSTMENTS - PARKWOOD

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3741 Douglas Blvd., Suite 150 Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Roseville, CA 95661
0 NORTH 150
300
600

EXISTING PROPOSED
VMDR

17.2 ± AC.

VMDR

15.8 ± AC.

VPR

1.0 ± AC.

VPR

1.8 ± AC.

VPR

1.5 ± AC.

VPR

2.7 ± AC.

VOS

0.3 ± AC.

VOS

0.3 ± AC.

VOS

0.1 ± AC.

VPR
VLDR
VLDR
VMDR
VMDR

VHDRVHDRVPR
VPR
VLDR
VLDR
VMDR
VMDR

VHDRVHDRVPR
VLDR

OAK TREE LANE OAK TREE LANE

SILVERADO
TRAIL

LAND USE SUMMARY

VLDRVOS

0.1 ± AC.

ROW

0.5 ± AC.

ROW

0.5 ± AC.

Figure 4: Land
Use Comparison

EXHIBIT A
429
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
1 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.1 Aesthetics and Visual Quality

4.1-3 The
proposed project
would introduce
light and glare
into the project
area.

4.1-3(a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that no light falls onto adjacent properties.

4.1-3(b) Surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open space, parks or residential neighborhoods shall not have reflective surfaces large enough to generate glare that creates a nuisance or safety hazard.

4.1-3I i. If future uses within any park include nighttime activities requiring overhead lights, the project applicant shall use site design and orientation in combination with a configuration of exterior light fixtures that emphasize close spacing and lower intensity light that is directed downward in order to minimize exposure of adjacent uses to lighting and to minimize the amount of light that is visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture.
ii.a. Activity-related lights (as opposed to security lighting) shall be turned off no later than 10:00 p.m. to reduce the amount of disruption to adjacent receptors; and/or ii.b. The City shall place a nuisance easement over parcels that will have direct views of such lights.

Applicant O DSD

4.3 Air Quality

4.3-1
Construction of
the proposed
project would
generate
emissions of
PM10 and PM2.5,
ROG, NOx, and
CO.

4.3-1 The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by the applicant(s) during all grading activities:

4.3-1(a) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant(s) shall submit to the City of Lincoln, as the lead agency, and receive approval of a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan. The plan shall be submitted to the PCAPCD for review and comment prior to approval by the City. This plan must address the minimum Administrative Requirements found in section 300 and 400 of PCAPCD Rule 228, Fugitive Dust.

Applicant G/C PSD
PCAPCD
430
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
2 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.3 Air Quality

4.3-1 (continued) 4.3-1(b) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e. make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower of greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. The project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreperson. The project shall provide a plan for approval by the District demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off- road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet-average up to 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent particulate reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average. The District should be contacted for average fleet emission data. Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late model engines, low-emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after-treatment products, and/or other options as they become available.

Applicant P, C PSD
PCAPCD

4.3-1(c) In order to control dust, an operational watering truck shall be on site during construction hours. In addition, dry chemical sweeping is prohibited. Watering at the construction site shall be carried out in the compliance with operating APCD rules and City of Lincoln requirements.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(d) The contractor shall suspend all grading operations when fugitive dusts exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations. The prime contractor shall be responsible for having an individual, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), who shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust, on a weekly basis. Fugitive dust is not to exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond property boundary at any time. If lime or other drying agents are used to dry out wet grading areas they shall be controlled as to not exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(e) The prime contractor shall be responsible for keeping adjacent public thoroughfares clean of silt, dirt, mud, and debris, and shall “wet broom” the streets (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City) if silt, dirt, mud or debris is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(f) The prime contractor shall apply methods such as surface stabilization, establishment of the vegetative cover, paving, or other methods to control dust approved by the City.

Applicant C PSD
431
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
3 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.3-1 (continued) 4.3-1(g) The prime contractor shall apply water or use other method to control dust impacts offsite. Construction vehicles leaving the site shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(h) No open burning of removed vegetation shall be allowed unless permitted by the PCAPCD. All removed vegetation material shall either be chipped on site or taken to an appropriate recycling site, or if a recycling site is not available, a licensed disposal site.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(i) Traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 miles per hour or less. Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(j) The prime contractor shall suspend all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous gusts) are high (typically winds greater than 25 miles per hour), and dust is traveling off-site.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(k) If required by the Engineering Division and/or the Department of Public Works, the contractor shall hold a pre-construction meeting prior to any grading activities. The contractor may invite the PCAPCD to the pre-construction meeting in order to discuss the construction emission/dust control plan with employees and/or contractors.

Applicant C PSD
PCAPCD

4.3-1(l) Stockpiles of dirt shall be covered when not being used or otherwise controlled to prevent erosion and/or dust.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-1(m) During construction, the contractor shall use existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean fuel (e.g., gasoline, biodiesel, natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators where feasible.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-(n) A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) caused by the use or manufacture of Cutback or Emulsified asphalts for paving, road construction or road maintenance, unless such manufacture or use complies with the provisions of Rule 217.

Applicant C PSD

4.3-2 Operation of
the proposed
project would
generate criteria
pollutant
emissions (ROG,

4.3-2(a) Wood burning or pellet appliances shall not be allowed in any residential units. Only natural gas or propane fired fireplace appliances shall be installed.

Applicant B DSD

4.3-2(c) For those projects that include stationary sources (e.g., gasoline dispensing facility, dry cleaning, large HVAC units), the applicant shall obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) permit prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

Applicant O DSD
432
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
NOx, CO, PM10,
and PM2.5).

4.3-2(d) Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, the applicant shall show that a Class 1, 2, or 3 bicycle lane(s) is provided in areas as approved by the Engineering Division and/or the Department of Public Works (or similar divisions within each jurisdiction), as defined elsewhere in these conditions of approval.

Applicant G PSD

4.3-2(e) Prior to Design Review Approval, the Site Plan shall show that the applicant has provided the appropriate number of preferential parking spaces for employees that carpool/vanpool/rideshare as well as the appropriate preferential parking for NEVs as required by the District and City Policy. Such stalls shall be clearly demarcated with signage as approved by the approving committee.

Applicant G DSD

4.3-2(f) Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that on-stie bicycle racks are provided.

Applicant B DSD

4.3-5 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
criteria air
pollutant
emissions.

4.3-5(a) At the time a final map is submitted, the City, in coordination with PCAPCD, shall calculate the emissions associated with the land uses to be approved under that particular tentative map. Based on that calculation, the applicant shall do one or a combination of the following to ensure NOx emissions do not exceed 10 lbs within the full Plan Area. Once the 10 lbs per day has been reached, subsequent projects must demonstrate no net increase in NOx emissions. The City shall consult with the PCAPCD to determine whether the measures proposed by the applicant would fully offset project emissions.
i) Reduce emissions on-site by incorporating design features that would reduce NOx emissions. These features may include, but would not be limited to, energy conservation or “green” building features such solar panels, energy efficient heating and cooling, energy star appliances, and/or measures that would reduce vehicle use, such as bike lockers and transit services, as provided for in Mitigation Measure 4.6-1.
ii) Reduce emissions off-site within the same region (i.e., City of Lincoln, Placer County) by participating in an offsite mitigation program coordinated by the PCAPCD and/or by funding energy-efficiency measures (e.g., installation of insulation and/or dual pane windows in existing buildings), vehicle emission reduction measures (e.g., replace diesel school buses with natural gas buses), and/or trip-reduction measures (e.g., bike lanes and/or NEV lanes on streets that do not have them).
iii) Participate in the Placer County Air Pollution District Offsite Mitigation Program by paying fees based on the project’s contribution of pollutants (ROG and NOx), adjusted by credit received for any applicable measures implemented by the project on or offsite. The actual amount to be paid shall be determined, and Applicant I DSD
PCAPCD
433
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
5 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.3-5 (continued) satisfied per current California Air Resources Board guidelines, at the time of recordation of small lot tentative maps.

4.4 Biological Resources

4.4-1 The
proposed project
would result in
the filling or
adverse
modification of
jurisdictional
wetland/ other
“waters of the
U.S.”

4.4-1(a) For projects developed within the programmatic portion, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a wetland delineation for each project prior to the issuance of a grading permit. This delineation shall be submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for verification prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the programmatic portion of the project site. If no wetlands are determined to be present, no further mitigation would be required.

Applicant P DSD
Corps

4.4-1(b) The project applicant shall prepare a wetland mitigation plan that ensures no net loss of wetlands, consistent with Lincoln General Plan Policies OSC-5.6, OSC-5.7, OSC-

5.8, and OSC-5.9. The wetland mitigation plan shall be based on the wetland delineation verified by the Corps. This measure may be implemented through the 404 permit and/or Streambed Alteration Agreement processes. The plan shall include the following or equally effective components.

Applicant G DSD
Corps
CDFG

4.4-1(c) The project proponent shall compensate for the loss of wetland habitat through a combination of preservation of vernal pools and seasonal wetlands in open space preserves, on-site restoration/enhancement, and the purchase of mitigation credits at an approved mitigation bank. The ratio of compensation shall be determined in consultation with the Corps and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), as part of the 404-permit process, but shall not be less than 1:1.

Applicant G DSD
Corps
CDFG

4.4-1(d) All preserved wetlands shall be dedicated to the City or a non-profit organization acceptable to the City and preserved through perpetual covenants enforceable by the City or other appropriate agencies, to ensure their maintenance and survival.

Applicant/City O City

4.4-1(e) Prior to any construction activities on the site, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of wetlands to be preserved in proximity to the areas that would be disturbed by construction. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the Corps and/or CDFG.

Applicant P DSD

4.4-1(f) A buffer shall be provided along all preserved wetlands in accordance with the 404 permit. Only those uses allowed in the 404 Permit and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.

Applicant I DSD

4.4-1(g) Water quality in the wetlands preserve shall be protected using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of Applicant G,P,C,O DSD
434
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
6 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-1 (continued) existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood, etc.), and geotextiles and mats, during construction in the watershed. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

4.4-1(h) Landscape irrigation runoff shall only be permitted to directly enter the wetlands preserve according to the provisions of the 404 Permit and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreement.

Applicant O DSD
PSD

4.4-1(i) Mowing and other maintenance activities shall be limited to those detailed in the 404 Permit and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreement.

Applicant O DSD
PSD

4.4-2 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
special-status
vernal pool
crustacean and
amphibian
species and
degradation
and/or loss of
their habitat.

4.4-2(a) The project applicant for projects within the programmatic portion of the project site shall retain a qualified biologist permitted by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to conduct vernal pool crustacean following current USFWS protocol.

Alternatively, the project applicant could forgo the surveys and assume presence of vernal pool crustaceans in all appropriate habitat within the project site. The survey or assumption of presence shall occur prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the programmatic portion of the project site.

Applicant G,P,C DSD

4.4-2(b) The project applicant for projects within the programmatic portion of the project site shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct aquatic surveys for the western spadefoot toad. Because a formal protocol does not exist for western spadefoot toad surveys, the scope of the surveys shall be determined in consultation with CDFG. At a minimum, the aquatic surveys for the western spadefoot toad shall include a search for spadefoot larvae during the appropriate season by a qualified biologist to determine presence or absence and potential project-related impacts to breeding sites.
435
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
7 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-2 (continued) 4.4-2(c) The following or equally effective measures (as approved by the City and USFWS and/or CDFG shall be required for any vernal pool crustacean and/or western spadefoot habitat identified through protocol surveys or assumed to be present in lieu of surveys. The selected measures may be part of the permitting process. i) The project proponents shall obtain a Biological Opinion from the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service and comply with the conditions and mitigation requirements the Biological Opinion to ensure that no net loss of habitat for vernal pool crustaceans occurs. Mitigation may include, but would not be limited to, both onsite and offsite preservation and creation of vernal pools and other suitable habitat for vernal pool crustaceans, purchase of credits at mitigation banks, payment of in lieu fees approved by the agencies, or other agency approved and required mitigation measures.
ii) Orange exclusionary fencing shall be placed and maintained around any avoided (preserved) vernal pool crustacean or western spadefoot habitat during construction to prevent impacts from construction vehicles and equipment. This fencing shall be inspected by a qualified biologist throughout the construction period to ensure that it is in good functional condition. After construction, fencing around open space areas containing wetlands or other sensitive habitats shall be replaced by permanent fencing that will be maintained by the City, and/or the local home owners association.
iii) Prior to beginning work in the project site, all on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitat.
iv) The project proponent shall ensure that activities defined by the USFWS, and Corps, RWQCB, and/or CDFG as inconsistent with the maintenance of the suitability of the remaining vernal pool habitat and associated watershed on-site are prohibited.
v) If western spadefoot is present, the applicant shall implement additional measures as deemed appropriate by the City and CDFG.

4.4-3 The
proposed project
could result in

4.4-3(a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys in seasonal wetlands and non-native annual grassland habitats within the project site for special-status plant species including but not limited to big-scale balsamroot, Applicant P DSD
436
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
8 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
the loss and/or
degradation of
rare plant
populations.

Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop, dwarf downingia, legenere, and pincushion navarretia during the appropriate time of year (March through June). If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no further mitigation would be required.

4.4-3(b) If Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop is located during the surveys in areas that would be disturbed by project construction, those populations shall be avoided and preserved in place to the extent feasible.

Applicant P,C DSD

4.4-3(c) If avoidance is not feasible, the project applicant shall consult with CDFG to obtain an incidental take permit, under Section 2081 of the CESA. Mitigation can be accomplished either in the onsite mitigation preserve area, or at an approved offsite mitigation bank. The ratio of mitigation credits shall be determined during this consultation, and may be conducted concurrently with Mitigation Measure 4.4-2.

Applicant P,C DSD
CDFG

4.4-3(d) If any other special-status vernal pool plant species, including, but not limited to dwarf downingia and legenere are located during the surveys in areas that cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-2, with the addition of soil/seed bank salvage, for use in created wetlands in mitigation areas.

Applicant P,C DSD
CDFG

4.4-3(e) If the plants cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall consult with the City and the CDFG regarding steps to take to offset the loss of the plants on the project site, such as transplantation, collecting seed or clippings and replanting species in an onsite location, prior to approval of a discretionary permit. At a minimum, at least ten (10) days prior to mass grading in the area that supports special-status plants, the project applicant shall notify the City and CDFG that grading is to occur and aid the CDFG with collection of the plant seeds, if the CDFG so chooses, pursuant to the California Native Plant Protection Act.

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-4 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
western pond
turtle and/or
degradation of its
habitat.

4.4-4(a) Prior to project construction that would disturb any drainages or stock ponds, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of suitable habitat within the area of disturbance and immediately adjacent area on the project site within 30 days prior to project construction to ensure no western pond turtles have established territories. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be re-surveyed. If this survey does not identify any western pond turtles on the project site, no further mitigation is required.

Applicant P DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-4(b) If western pond turtles (WPT) are determined to be present within a drainage or stock pond, and the feature is to be retained, exclusionary fencing shall be used to prevent the turtle(s) from entering construction area. The location of the fence shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Any turtles found in or near the construction Applicant P,C DSD
PSD
CDFG 437
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
9 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-4 (continued) zone shall be relocated to an appropriate area of suitable habitat a minimum of 100 feet from any active construction zone. Measures shall be implemented to ensure that the drainages and stock ponds will continue to provide adequate habitat for the WPT by protecting water quality and ensuring that the reduction of drainage from the project site does not substantially diminish the water levels in the pond.

4.4-4(c) If the drainage or stock pond cannot be retained, the project applicant shall relocate any WPT found during surveys in a manner developed by a qualified biologist and approved by the CDFG.

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-5 The
proposed project
could result in
the direct loss or
disturbance of
nesting birds
protected by the
MBTA, including
raptors (birds-of-
prey).

4.4-5(a) If construction is to occur between March 15 and August 30, the project applicant shall conduct a pre-construction breeding-season survey of the project site within 30 days of construction onset. Surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted within 1/4 mile of proposed ground disturbance. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any protected raptors are nesting on or directly adjacent to the project site. A nest survey for migratory birds shall be conducted within 500 feet of construction areas to determine if any migratory birds are nesting on or directly adjacent to the project site. The results of the survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. New surveys shall be conducted if construction of the surveyed area extends into the following season, unless all of the potential nesting trees have been removed.

A report shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln, following the completion of the bird nesting survey that includes, at a minimum, the following information:
i) A description of methodology including dates of field visits, the names of survey personnel with resumes, and a list of references cited and persons contacted. ii) A map showing the location(s) of any protected raptor or migratory bird nests observed on the project site.

Applicant P,C DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-5(b) If the above survey does not identify any protected raptor or migratory bird nests on the project site, no further mitigation would be required. However, should any active nests be located on the project site, the project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all protected raptor and migratory bird nest sites located in the project site disturbance area(s) during the breeding season (approximately March 15 through August 30) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a non- Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
438
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-5 (continued) disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing.

4.4-6 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
nesting
Swainson’s
hawk.

4.4-6(a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a Swainson’s hawk nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, extending out to ¼ mile. The survey shall be conducted during the nesting season of the same calendar year that construction is expected to begin, and prior to the issuance of any grading permits. If this survey does not identify any nesting Swainson’s hawk in the area within the project site that will be disturbed plus the ¼-mile radius, no further mitigation would be required.

Applicant P DSD
PSD

4.4-6(b) Should any active Swainson’s hawk nests be located within ¼ mile of the disturbance area, no intensive new disturbances (e.g. heavy equipment operation associated with construction, use of cranes or draglines, etc.) or other project-related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging, shall be initiated within the ¼ mile (buffer zone) of an active nest between March 1 - September 15 (or until August 15 if a Management Authorization or Biological Opinion is obtained for the project). The buffer zone should be increased to 1/2 mile in nesting areas away from urban development (i.e. in areas where disturbance [e.g. heavy equipment operation associated with construction, use of cranes or draglines, new rock crushing activities] is not a normal occurrence during the nesting season).

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG 4.4-6(c) Nest trees should not be removed to the extent feasible. If a nest tree must be removed, a Management Authorization (including conditions to off-set the loss of the nest tree) must be obtained with the tree removal period specified in the Management Authorization, generally from October 1 to February 1. If construction or other project related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging are necessary within the buffer zone, then the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to monitor the nest site (to determine if the nest is abandoned).

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-6(d) If an active nest is abandoned and if the nestlings are still alive, the project sponsor shall fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release of captive reared young) of the nestling(s). Routine disturbances such as agricultural activities, commuter traffic, and routine facility maintenance activities within ¼ mile of an active nest shall not be prohibited.

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
439
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
11 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-7 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
burrowing owl
individuals
(eggs, nestlings
or juveniles).

4.4-7(a) The project applicant shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct both nesting and wintering season surveys for burrowing owl to determine if potential habitat within 500 feet of ground disturbance is used by this species. The timing and methodology for the surveys shall be based on the CDFG/Burrowing Owl Consortium Survey Guidelines and are detailed below. CDFG may require that these surveys be repeated annually if project construction is expected to span over two or more years.

Winter Season (December 1 through January 31)
• Four site visits on separate days, 2 hours before to 1 hour after sunset or 1 hour before to 2 hours after sunrise.

Nesting Season (February 1 to August 31)
• Four site visits on separate days, 2 hours before to 1 hour after sunset or 1 hour before to 2 hours after sunrise. At least two of the surveys shall be conducted during the peak nesting season between April 15 and July 15.

Applicant P DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-7(b) In addition to the wintering and nesting season surveys, pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by an experienced biologist within 30-days prior to the start of work activities where land conversions are planned in known or suitable habitat areas. If construction activities are delayed for more than 30 days after the preconstruction surveys, then a new preconstruction survey will be required. All surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the CDFG/Burrowing Owl Consortium survey protocols (Burrowing Owl Consortium, 1993).

Applicant P DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-7(c) If burrowing owls are discovered in the programmatic portions of the project site, the project applicant shall notify the City and CDFG. A qualified biologist shall implement a routine monitoring program and establish a fenced exclusion zone around each occupied burrow. No construction activities shall be allowed within the exclusion zone until such time that the burrows are determined to be unoccupied. The buffer zones shall be a minimum of 150 feet from an occupied burrow during the non- breeding season (September 1 through January 31), and a minimum of 250 feet from an occupied burrow during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31).

Applicant P,C DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-7(d) The project applicant shall provide appropriate mitigation for project related effects on burrowing owl in consultation with CDFG. Mitigation can be conducted either onsite, or at an off-site location that is approved by the CDFG. Preference is for onsite within open space areas, if possible.

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
440
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
12 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-7 (continued)

4.4-7(e) The CDFG shall be consulted regarding the implementation of avoidance or passive relocation methods. All activities that will result in a disturbance to burrows shall be approved by CDFG prior to implementation.

Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-8 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
foraging habitat
for Swainson’s
hawk, white
tailed kite,
burrowing owl
and other
raptors.

4.4-8 The project applicant shall preserve annual grasslands or other suitable raptor foraging habitat at a ratio of 0.75 to 1.0 (as approved by the City and CDFG).

Preservation may occur through either:
• Payment of a mitigation fee to the City of Lincoln through a negotiated agreement between the City, the project applicant, and CDFG. The monies would be held in a trust fund, and used to preserve mitigation land through the purchase, monitoring, maintenance, and remediation of lands that supports suitable foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk. (consistent with CDFG guidelines); or
• Purchase of conservation easements or fee title to suitable Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat to protect the habitat from urban development; or • If adopted prior to issuance of the first grading permit for the proposed project, the project applicant may mitigate this impact through participation in the Placer County Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan. If the plan is adopted prior to construction of a future phase, the project applicant may mitigate this impact through participation in the plan.

Applicant G DSD
PSD
CDFG

4.4-9 The
proposed project
could result in
loss of Valley
elderberry
longhorn beetles
and their habitat.

4.4-9(a) Prior to any ground-disturbing activity, the project proponents shall conduct a survey for potential VELB habitat (elderberry shrubs) within 100 feet) of the area to be disturbed.

Applicant P DSD
441
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
13 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-9 (continued) 4.4-9(b) Any ground disturbing activities within 100 feet of elderberry plants containing stems measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level shall conform to the following minimum avoidance measures:
i) Applicants shall provide a minimum setback of at least 20 feet from the drip line of each elderberry plant containing stems measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level. The setbacks shall be fenced and flagged to identify equipment and materials encroachment into the setback zone. Fire fuel breaks (disked land) may not be included within the 6 m set back. Where encroachment within the 20 foot setback zone is unavoidable, the applicant shall provide compensatory mitigation at a 50 percent ratio of the standard requirements identified in the table below.

Applicant C PSD

ELDERBERRY MITIGATION RATIOS

Location/Ste
m Size*
Exit
Holes**
Elderberry
Seedling
Ratio
Elderberry
Seedling
Ratio
Elderberry
Seedling
Ratio
Associated
Native Plant
Ratio
Stems ≥1” &
< 3”
No 2:1 4:1 5:1 1:1
Yes 4:1 8:1 10:1 2:1
Stems ≥3”&
<5”
No 3:1 6:1 8:1 1:1
Yes 6:1 12:1 15:1 2:1
Stems ≥ 5” No 4:1 8:1 10:1 1:1
Yes 8:1 16:1 20:1 2:1
Notes:
* Ratios are shown for elderberry occurring in existing or historic riparian situations. Ratios for elderberry in non-riparian situations are 50 percent of the standard ratio. ** The presence of exit holes in a stem, bush, or contiguous clump applies to the entire site.

ii) Construction contractors shall be briefed on the need to avoid damaging the elderberry plants and the possible penalties for not complying with these requirements.
442
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
14 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.4-9 (continued) iii) Work crews shall be instructed about the status of the beetle and the need to protect its elderberry host plant.
iv) No insecticides, herbicides, fertilizers, or other chemicals that might harm the beetle or its host plant shall be used in the buffer areas, or within 100 feet of any elderberry plant with one or more stems measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level. v) Mowing of grasses/ground cover shall occur only from July through April to reduce fire hazard. No mowing shall occur closer than 5 feet to elderberry plant stems. Mowing must be done in a manner that avoids damaging plants (e.g., avoid stripping away bark through careless use of mowing/trimming equipment).
vi) Trimming of elderberry stems less than 1 inch in diameter may occur between September 1 and March 14. The recommended period for trimming is between November through the first two weeks in February when the plants are dormant and after they have lost their leaves.

4.4-9(c) In cases where removal of elderberry shrubs or their stems measuring 1-inch or greater (removal or trimming) is unavoidable, these impacts shall be compensated for by salvaging and planting the affected elderberry shrubs and planting additional elderberry shrubs and associated native riparian plants according to the ratios specified in the table, above. Mitigation planting shall occur, to the maximum extent practicable, in areas adjacent to the impact area and/or located to fill in existing gaps in riparian corridors.

Applicant C DSD
PSD

4.4-10 The
proposed project
could result in
loss of nesting
habitat for tri-
colored blackbird
and black rail.

4.4-10(a) For portions of the project where the onset of construction occurs between April 1 and August 31, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre- construction nesting surveys for tri-colored blackbird colonies and black rail within the disturbance areas on the project site. The survey shall be conducted no more than 30 days from the onset of construction. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be re-surveyed. If the survey does not identify any colonies of nesting tricolor blackbirds or black rail on the project site, no further mitigation would be required.

Applicant P DSD
PSD

4.4-10(b) Should any active tricolor blackbird colonies or black rail be found nesting on the project site, the project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all active nest sites located in the project site during the breeding season while the nest site is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance Applicant C DSD
PSD
443
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
15 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
could consist of delaying construction to avoid the nesting season or establishing a buffer around the nest site. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site.

The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG, and will be, at a minimum, 250 feet. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used.

4.4-12 The
proposed project
could result in
substantial
interference with
the movement of
resident and
migratory wildlife
species.

4.4-12(a) To the extent feasible, the bridge crossing of Auburn Ravine and culverts on Ingram Slough shall be designed to minimize the restriction of wildlife movement through the project site. This would include design measures that provide the greatest amount of space feasible underneath bridge or culvert structures such that wildlife species are not forced to cross roadways or move into urban areas to move from one area of natural habitat to another.

Applicant C DSD PSD

4.4-12(b) In addition to pre-construction surveys for special-status species, as described in Mitigation Measures 4.4-3 through 4.4-7 and 4.4-9 through 4.4-11, the project applicant shall obtain all necessary permits to alter project site waterways, including a CDFG Streambed Alteration Agreement, a Corps Section 404 permit, a Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 Certification, and a SWPPP and any FESA/CESA take permits, should special-status species be identified.

Applicant C DSD PSD

4.4-12(c) If construction commences after July 2026, a qualified biologist shall conduct a bat habitat assessment as described. If roosting bats are discovered, the measures identified on pages 4 and 5 of the Bat Habitat Assessment (July 2025) prepared by Madrone Ecological Consulting in order to protect roosting bats.

Applicant C DSD PSD

4.4-13
Occupancy of the
proposed project
could result in an
increase in
ambient light in
adjacent
undeveloped
areas, which
could affect
wildlife.

4.4-13 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.1-3(a), which requires that light standards be shielded and directed to ensure that light does not fall on adjacent parcels.

Applicant B DSD
444
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
16 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

4.4-14 The
proposed project

4.4-14 Implement the Village 1 Specific Plan Oak Woodland Mitigation and Management Plan.

Applicant I DSD
PSD

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
could result in
loss of protected
oak trees and
oak woodlands.

4.5 Cultural Resources

4.5-1 The
proposed project
could damage or
destroy known
historic-period
resources.

4.5-1 (continued)

4.5-1(a) As part of the subsequent CEQA review for any small lot tentative map, or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a small lot tentative map, within the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan, the project applicant shall hire a professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Historic Architecture to perform the following:
i) conduct an historical architectural survey for areas that have not been subject to comprehensive investigation meeting professional standards. ii) identify and evaluate the historic-period resources identified in the cultural resource investigation for the property subject to the grading permit and/or improvement plans. Resources that have been identified to date, but not evaluated, include P-31-0965, P-31-1679-H, P-31-1680, P-31-1682, P-31- 1683, P-31-1684, P-31-1686, P-31-1687, P-31-1688, P-31-1689, P-31-1691- H, P-31-1695, P-31-1696, P-31-1698-H, P-31-1708, P-31-1710, P-31-1719, P-31-1721, P-31-1723, P-31-2611-H, and P-31-2612-H.

If none of the identified historic resources within the property subject to the grading permit and/or improvement plans are found to be eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR, no further action is required.

Applicant P DSD
445
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
17 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

4.5-1(b) A design plan shall be prepared by a professional meeting Secretary of Interior standards for all resources found to be eligible for listing pursuant to Mitigation Measure 4.5-1(a). The design plan shall incorporate methods determined appropriate and feasible by the historic architecture professional in coordination with the City of Lincoln. Methods to reduce impacts on historic-period resources shall include, but not be limited to,
i) If feasible, the resources shall be preserved in place, and, as appropriate, incorporated into parks and open space/corridors; ii) If it is not feasible to preserve the resource in place, it shall be recorded pursuant to Secretary of Interior standards, and architectural features and/or artifacts shall be made available to an appropriate museum and/or historical organization;
Applicant P,G DSD
446
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
18 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
iii) If the significant historical resource is retained and reused, all rehabilitation, renovation, and additions shall meet Secretary of Interior standards to the extent feasible;
iv) Project development to adjacent to significant historical resources that are to be retained shall be designed to be in character with the historic setting of the resources, consistent with Secretary of Interior standards; v) Commemorative markers and interpretive exhibits shall be used to educate the public about the history of the plan area. The content of the commemorative markers and interpretive exhibits could include subjects such as mining, ranching, and Native American activities in the plan area. Markers and exhibits shall be prepared by a historic architecture professional or equally qualified professional.

4.5-2 The
proposed project
could damage or
destroy identified
archaeological
resources.

4.5-2a) As part of the subsequent CEQA review for any small lot tentative map, or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a small lot tentative map, in the unsurveyed portion of Phase 1 (APN’s 021-272-012 and 021-272-013) and the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan that has not been subject to comprehensive investigation for the identification of Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs), the project applicant shall submit to the City a draft cultural resources report that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for all previously unsurveyed portions of the project site. The City shall consult with the California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area prior to completion of the draft report.

Upon receipt of a discretionary entitlement application (e.g., small lot tentative map), or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a discretionary entitlement, the City shall notify California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area who have requested notification pursuant to AB 52. The City shall request that the tribe(s) identify portions of the project site that could be sensitive or potentially sensitive for tribal cultural resources (TCRs) and evaluate any TCRs that the Tribe determines to be present. If requested by the Tribe(s), information regarding known sites and areas within the project boundaries that are potentially sensitive for TCRs shall be provided to the Tribe(s), and, if requested, a site visit will be conducted with tribal representatives.

The notification will contain the following:

Applicant A,P,G DSD
447
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
19 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.5-2 (continued)

• A request to consult, pursuant to AB52.
• A written description of the type of proposed ground disturbance, location and boundaries.
• A description of the activities (e.g., HDD, trenching, etc.). • A map of the project area at a sufficient scale to indicate the spatial extent of activities.
• A detailed description of the depth of excavation.

The draft cultural resources report will be provided to the tribe(s) with the notification. The final cultural resources report will incorporate the findings of the Tribe. If a tribe does not respond to the City’s notice within 30 days, it will be assumed that they are not aware of any TCRs within the project site.

If the Tribe identifies one or more areas within the project site that could be sensitive for TCRs, and the potentially sensitive site is in an area that would be disturbed by project construction, all necessary measures to avoid and protect the site shall be considered, and a Treatment Plan shall be prepared in consultation with the Tribe prior to any disturbance of the potential TCR site. The Treatment Plan shall include identification methods, including but not limited to, where appropriate, canine forensic surveys, ground penetrating radar, or vegetation clearing for better visibility.

If the identified site is a tribal cultural resource, the project shall be designed to avoid the resource, if feasible. If there are resources that cannot be avoided, the City, shall consult with the geographically and culturally affiliated tribe(s) regarding the protection measures that are proposed to be implemented. These protection measures will be written in clear, enforceable language. The City shall provide the tribe(s) the opportunity to submit comments and participate in consultation to resolve issues of concern. The project proponent shall not implement the treatment until the tribe approves protection measures, or if agreement cannot be reached after a good-faith effort, the City determines that any or all feasible measures have been implemented, where feasible, and the resource is either avoided or protected.

4.5-2(b) As part of the subsequent CEQA review, including AB 52 consultation where applicable, for any small lot tentative map, or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a small lot tentative map, the consulting Tribe(s) shall Applicant,
DSD

A, P,G DSD
448
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
20 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
evaluate the resources identified as P-31-1678, P-31-1681, P-31-1688, P-31-1690, P-31-1693, P-31-1694, P-31-1696, P-31-1699, P-31-1700, P-31-1718, P-31-1720, P-31-1722, P-31-1724, P-31-1725, P-31-1726, P-31-1729, P-31-1730, P-31-1731, P-31-1732, P-31-1733, P-31-1734, P-31-1735, and P-31-1737, as well as any unrecorded TCRs, sacred lands, Tribal Cultural Landscapes, or areas of tribal cultural or religious significance. For any site that qualifies as a TCR, historical resource or unique archaeological resource, mitigation of impacts on the resource shall follow standard professional procedures, including, but not limited to, avoidance, protection, written and photographic documentation, or other measures identified in California Public Resources Code section 21083.2, or in consultation with Tribes as described in (a), above.

4.5-3 The
proposed project
could cause a
substantial
adverse change
in the
significance of
previously
undiscovered
prehistoric or
historic-period
archaeological
resources.

4.5-3a) Construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of buried cultural resources anywhere within the project site and the protocol to be followed if a tribal cultural resource is encountered. Prior to the onset of grading, the project applicant shall distribute a cultural resources handbook that explains the procedures to follow if cultural resources and human remains are encountered, provide a list of important contact information and phone numbers, and include written descriptions and photographic examples (where possible) of cultural resources. The project applicant may shall also hire a certified Tribal Monitor to conduct a pre-construction training of all construction personnel involved in grading and excavation activity. If the area has been previously determined to be culturally sensitive, the project proponent shall hire a certified tribal monitor to observe all initial ground disturbing activities (e.g., initial grading and trenching in areas not previously graded) in the area determined to be culturally sensitive. Additional monitoring of ground disturbing activities may be required, based on the sensitivity of the area.

Applicant C DSD

4.5-3(b) In the event that any previously unidentified subsurface archaeological or Tribal Cultural resources are discovered during construction-related earth-moving activities, all ground-disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Lincoln (the City) shall be notified. The City shall consult with the consulting Tribe(s) to assess the significance of the find. If the find is determined to be significant by the Tribe(s) (i.e., because the find is determined to constitute either an historical resource, unique archaeological resource and/or a tribal cultural resource), then representatives of the City, the geographically and culturally affiliated tribal representative (for prehistoric and tribal cultural resources) and the qualified archaeologist and consulting tribe(s) shall meet to determine the appropriate course of action, with the City making the final decision. All significant cultural materials that cannot avoided in place shall be collected by the Tribal Applicant,
DSD
C DSD
449
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
21 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.5-3 (continued)
Monitor and stored in a secure location on site, such as a lock box or conex. All materials shall be reburied in an area that is predetermined to not have future ground disturbing activities. This area shall be recorded using GPS by the consulting Tribe and the location kept confidential in the tribal database.

4.5-3(c) If the consulting Tribe(s) determines that some or all of the affected property qualifies as a Tribal Cultural Landscape, including a Native American sanctified cemetery, place of worship, religious or ceremonial site, or sacred shrine (Public Resources Code section 5097.9) or a Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources pursuant to Public Resources Code §5024.1, including any historic or prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, any archaeological or historic site (Public Resources Code Section 5097.993), the archaeologist, in consultation with the tribe, shall recommend to the City potentially feasible mitigation measures that would preserve the integrity of the site or minimize impacts to it, including any or a combination of the following:
i. Avoidance, preservation, and/or enhancement of all or a portion of the Tribal Cultural Landscape as open space or habitat, with a conservation easement dedicated to the most interested and appropriate tribal organization, if such an organization is willing to accept and maintain such an easement, or alternatively, a cultural resource organization that holds conservation easements;
ii. An agreement with any such tribal or cultural resource organization to maintain the confidentiality of the location of the site so as to minimize the danger of vandalism to the site or other damage to its integrity; or iii. Other measures, short of full or partial avoidance or preservation, intended to minimize impacts to the Native American Cultural Place consistent with land use assumptions and the proposed design and footprint of the development project for which the requested grading permit has been approved.

Applicant C DSD

4.5-3(d) After receiving such recommendations, the City shall assess the feasibility of the recommendations and impose the most protective mitigation feasible. In reaching conclusions with respect to these recommendations, the City shall consult with both the project applicant and the geographically and culturally affiliated Tribe(s) engaged in AB52 consultation with the City.

City C DSD

4.5-3(e) Implement Mitigation Measure 4.5-4, in the event human remains are discovered. See Measure 4.5-4 450
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
22 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.5-4 The
proposed project
could disturb
human remains.

4.5-4 (continued)

4.5-4 If human remains are discovered at any project construction sites during any phase of construction, all ground-disturbing activity within 50 feet of the remains shall be halted immediately, and the City of Lincoln (the City) and the Placer County coroner shall be notified immediately. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project applicant shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of state law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The project applicant shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City, before the resumption of ground-disturbing activities within 50 feet of where the remains were discovered.

Applicant/City C DSD

4.5-5 The
proposed project
could directly or
indirectly destroy
unique
paleontological
resources.

4.5-5(a) Construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of discovering fossils anywhere within the project site, but primarily in the western part of Phase 1, and the protocol to be followed if a fossil is encountered. This information shall be included in the “cultural resources handbook” prepared under Mitigation Measure

4.5-3. It shall describe procedures to follow if fossils are encountered, provide a list of important contact information and phone numbers, and include written descriptions and photographic examples (where possible) of the fossils. The project applicant may also hire a professional who meets the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards to conduct a pre-construction training of all construction personnel involved in grading and excavation activity.

Applicant/City C DSD

4.5-5(b) In the event that paleontological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities, ground-disturbing activity within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted until the project applicant hires a qualified paleontologist to examine the resources and assess its significance. If the resource is determined to be significant, representatives of the City of Lincoln (the City) and the qualified paleontologist shall determine the appropriate course of action (i.e., any additional exploratory measures deemed necessary for the further evaluation of and/or mitigation of adverse impacts to the resources), with the City making the final decision. All significant paleontological resources recovered shall be subject to scientific analysis Applicant/City C DSD
451
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
23 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
and professional curation; a report of these activities shall be prepared for the City by the paleontologist according to current professional standards.

4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change

4.6-1 The
proposed project
would generate
greenhouse gas
emissions, either
directly or
indirectly, that
would contribute
to global climate
change.

4.6-1(a) An Energy Conservation Plan for all commercial and residential development shall be required prior to recordation of the first small lot Final Map. The plan shall describe the techniques and programs to be employed in the development of the project to achieve a minimum 15 percent energy efficiency above that required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations, or compliance with the then-current Title 24 energy efficiency regulations. These programs shall include one or more of the following, or equally effective measures:

Participation in the PG&E Energy Star Performance Method. This method is available to builders of single-family and multi-family homes that are at least 15 percent more energy efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications. Participating builders become part of the California Energy Star New Homes Program, and their homes earn the Energy Star label. Incremental incentives can also be earned by adding energy efficient appliances and/or lighting to homes. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include all energy efficiency features to be incorporated into the project.

OR
Participation in the New Solar Homes Partnership (NSHP) Performance Method.

This method is available to builders of single-family homes that are at least 15 percent more efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the floor plans and exterior elevations submitted in conjunction with the Building Permit application, shall show that the applicant has installed the appropriate number of solar panels or Photovoltaic roofing tiles throughout the project (described as lot numbers, locations, and/or building numbers and locations) to offset that development’s share of the 7,599,510 kwh/year total Plan’s onsite renewable energy offsets.

OR
Participation in the Build It Green Program, which was created by Build It Green, a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote health, durable, energy and resource efficient buildings throughout California. Using the Green Point Checklist, a home can be considered green if it fulfills the prerequisites and earns at least 50 points and meets the minimum points per category: Energy (30 points); Indoor Air Applicant I DSD
452
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
24 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.6-1 (continued)
Quality (5 points); Resources (6 points); and Water (9 points). Build It Green uses certified Green Point Raters to measure success with the program and verification of the measures employed to meet the requirements of the checklist. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include a completed copy of the Green Point Checklist.

4.6-1(b) The project applicant shall be responsible for having prepared, by an experienced and qualified firm, an Energy Resource Conservation Guide that will provide educational information on how homeowners can increase energy efficiency and conservation in their new homes. The information will be delivered to each original homeowner as part of the move-in package. The information packet shall be reviewed by, and be subject to approval of, City of Lincoln staff. A copy of the Energy Resource Conservation Guide shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the completion of construction activities, and finalized before occupancy.

Applicant O DSD

4.6-1(c) Light Emitting Diode (LED) traffic signals and LED street lights, or more energy- efficient signals and streetlights, shall be installed in accordance with City improvement standards or as otherwise approved by the Development Services Director.

Applicant G DSD

4.6-1(d) The project applicant shall prepare a tree planting program to guide the planting of shade trees within residential lots and along streets in a manner that reduces radiant heat. Commercial and retail parking lots shall be planted with shade trees that will produce 50% coverage within 15 years. Landscape Plans submitted for Design Review shall include a copy of the tree planting program.

Applicant G DSD

4.6-1(e) A tree information planting and care guide shall be delivered to each original homeowner as a part of the move in package. If the guide is prepared by someone other than the City, it shall be reviewed by, and be subject to the approval of, City of Lincoln staff. . A copy of the tree information planting and care guide shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the completion of construction activities, and finalized before occupancy.

Applicant O DSD

4.6-1(f) Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be installed as part of the original construction of residential and commercial structures. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include documentation of the energy efficient lighting fixtures to be used.

Applicant B DSD

4.6-1(g) New commercial buildings shall be 15 percent more energy efficient than the 2008 Title 24 building standards based on annual energy usage requirements, or comply with the then-current Title 24 energy efficiency regulations. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include all energy efficiency features to be incorporated into the project.

Applicant B DSD
453
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
25 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.6-1 (continued)

4.6-1(h) Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, the applicant shall show that the roadway system shall be designed to accommodate the usage of neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs).

Applicant G DSD, PSD

4.6-1(i) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, Improvement Plans, or Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that bus turnouts and transit shelters shall be placed on roadways that are to be served by future bus transit in accordance with City improvement standards and as otherwise directed by City’s Development Services Director.

Applicant G DSD, PSD

4.6-1(j) Implement Mitigation Measure 4.3-2. See MM 4.3-2 454
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
26 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.7 Hazardous Materials

4.7-2 The
proposed project
could occur in
locations where
historic land
uses are known
to have resulted
in soil or
groundwater
contamination or
may have the
potential to have
caused soil or
groundwater
contamination.

4.7-2(a) Prior to approval of any Tentative Map and/or a specific development permit, the applicant shall submit a Phase I ESA that has been prepared in accordance with the most current ASTM 1527 standard. If the results of the Phase I ESA indicate no recognized environmental conditions, no further action is required. However, the City shall ensure Improvement Plans and/or grading permits include the requirements of Mitigation Measure 4.7-2(b) pertaining to the discovery of previously unidentified conditions or hazards. No Phase I ESA is necessary for the Walkup Ranch property because one has already been prepared.

Applicant I DSD

4.7-2(b) For any specific development location for which the Phase I ESA completed in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.7-2(a) identifies recommendations for further investigation and/or remediation, prior to issuance of a grading permit for the affected location, the City shall ensure the recommendations are implemented to the satisfaction of PCDEHS. If contaminants are present at levels that could pose a human health or environmental risk that would be immediately dangerous to life and health, no soil disturbance shall be permitted until the location has been remediated to the satisfaction of PCDEHS. If contaminants are present at levels that do not pose an immediate threat, construction activities may proceed provided a Soil Management Plan and Health and Safety Plan prepared by a qualified professional have been submitted to and approved by PCDEHS. The City shall also ensure Improvement Plans and/or grading permits include the requirements of this Mitigation Measure 4.7-2(b) pertaining to the discovery of previously unidentified conditions or hazards. If previously unidentified contamination is discovered in the former Titan missile facility or gun range parcels (PA 15 and PA 66) (parcel numbers are based on the August 2011 Specific Plan), the City shall immediately notify CVRWQCB. Work in those areas shall not resume until approved by CVRWQCB.

Applicant P,G DSD
PCDEHS
CVRWQB
455
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
27 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.7-3 Demolition
of on-site
structures to
accommodate
development of
the Village 1
Specific Plan
could expose
people to
potential health
hazards by
demolishing
buildings on the
project site that
could contain
asbestos and/or
lead-based paint.

4.7-3 Prior to demolition of any structures located on the project site, the project applicant(s) shall retain a Cal OSHA-certified lead-based paint and ACBM contractor to conduct a risk assessment of all structures on-site constructed prior to 1978 for the presence of ACBMs and/or lead-based paint. If ACBMs and/or lead- based paint are determined to exist on site, the contractor shall prepare a site- specific ACBM and lead hazard control plan. If the plan calls for the removal of ACBMs and lead-based paints prior to demolition activities, ACBM removal methods may include, but are not limited to: dry stripping, wet controlled stripping, high pressure water jetting, and air management for hot stripping. Paint removal methods may include, but are not limited to: use of a heat gun, tools equipped with HEPA exhaust capability, wet scraping, and chemical removers. If removal is not deemed necessary prior to demolition, the plan shall make other recommendations for the containment of any ACBMs or lead-based paint materials that could be released into the environment during demolition activities, as well as appropriate disposal methods. The plan shall also provide specific instructions for providing protective clothing and gear for abatement personnel.

Wastes from abatement and demolition activities shall be managed and disposed of at a landfill(s) licensed to accept ACBMs and lead-based waste.

Once all abatement measures have been implemented, the project applicant(s) shall provide written documentation to the City that ACBM and lead-based paint testing and abatement, if necessary, has been completed in accordance with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including: lead-based paint exposure guidelines provided in “Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead Based Paint Hazards in Housing” by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Construction Safety Order 1532.1 from Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), and the California Department of Health Services.

Applicant P DSD

4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality

4.8-1 The
proposed project
would increase
the amount of
impervious
surfaces and
alter drainage
patterns, which
could increase
the potential for

4.8-1(a) i) Project applicant(s) shall ensure that planned improvements to the SR 193 bridge are operational prior to receiving a grading permit for development in the programmatic portion (beginning with Phase 2).

OR
ii) If SR 193 bridge improvements are not completed prior to receiving a grading permit for areas within the Auburn Ravine watershed, beginning with Phase 2, the applicant(s) shall provide on-site detention and/or retention to mitigate increases in water surface elevation (WSE) if the results of modeling show a 0.05-foot increase Applicant G PSD
DSD
456
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
28 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
localized and
downstream
flooding.
or greater in WSE, or if peak flow rates increase by 1 percent or more within project boundary or downstream of the SR 193 bridge.

AND
iii) Project applicant(s) shall provide for peak flow mitigation as defined in Village 1 Specific Plan, City of Lincoln, CA, Drainage Master Plan Table II.F.1B for the programmatic portion in order to mitigate potential on-site flooding from increased peak flows associated with development of the projects. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, project applicants shall demonstrate that provisions for peak flow mitigation in the preliminary grading plan, as defined in Village 1 Specific Plan, City of Lincoln, CA, Drainage Master Plan Table II.F.1B and Tables III.A.3A to III.A.3F, as applicable for the project. The City Engineer shall review plans for compliance with the applicable portions of Table II.F.1B and Tables III.A.3A to III.A.3F, as applicable, prior to issuance of a grading permit. Prior to issuing a building permit for any project in the Village 1 Specific Plan, overbank excavation and stabilization of channels that will receive runoff from the area(s) to be developed shall be completed. The City Engineer shall confirm that peak flow mitigation has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans. iv) The project applicant for projects within the programmatic portion of the project site shall prohibit development of structures within the modeled floodplains of North and South Ingram Slough as identified in the Village 1 Specific Plan, City of Lincoln, CA, Drainage Master Plan Post-Project 100-Year Floodplain Alt. 193 Fix figures.

4.8-2 The
proposed project
would increase
stormwater
volumes in
Auburn Ravine,
Ingram Slough,
Orchard Creek,
and ultimately
the Natomas
Cross Canal.

4.8-2(a) Prior to approval of the first final map, the Applicant shall identify 87.1 acre-feet of storage capacity in the watershed to accommodate increased stormwater runoff volumes associated with the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan.

Storage capacity may be incorporated into on-site design, obtained at the approved LFVMF, if operational at the time of development, or at a location approved by or acceptable to the City.

The Applicant shall be required to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, and maintenance of the LFVMF to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Village 1 Specific Plan. For capital improvements, funding shall be through the City’s existing PFE program. Fees for operation and maintenance shall be through an assessment district established during the Final Map processing. Fees shall be paid in conjunction with issuance of building permits. If, at the time the first final map is submitted for approval, the regional facilities are not available or operational, or if additional capacity is required, the Applicant shall incorporate in to the final design sufficient on-site Applicant I PSD
DSD
457
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
29 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.8-2 (continued) storage capacity, or a combination of on-site and off-site capacity, to fully mitigate the 87.1 acre-feet.

If off-site facilities are used, the Applicant shall be required to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, maintenance, and management of the regional retention facilities to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Village1 Specific Plan. Assuming the regional facility has been constructed, Applicant shall pay the appropriate fees.

4.8-4 The
proposed project
would increase
the types and
amounts of
pollutants in
stormwater
runoff that could
be discharged to
Ingram Slough
and its
tributaries
and Auburn
Ravine, which
could degrade
water quality.

4.8-4 Low Impact Development BMPs. Project Conditions of Approval shall specify that appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) be incorporated into project design prior to approval of final grading/improvement plan(s) to reduce urban pollutants in runoff, consistent with goals and standards established under federal and State non-point source discharge NPDES regulations and Basin Plan water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance No. 826B, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan.

The proposed water quality facilities shall be identified and designed in a Water Quality Management Plan prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.40 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. All water quality facilities identified in the Water Quality Management Plan shall be constructed with the installation of the infrastructure.

Applicant G PSD
DSD
458
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
30 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

4.8-4 (continued) The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all non-structural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs. Non- structural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping.

The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities. The City shall formally adopt and implement a funding mechanism specifically to fund the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities as proposed by the Stormwater Management Plan.

The project Applicant shall submit a site-specific BMP plan showing the on-site locations and effectiveness of the BMP facilities proposed for long-term water quality impact reduction prior to project approval. The plan shall include a method or methods for financing the long-term maintenance of the proposed site-specific facilities.

All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions (or other similar source approved by the City) for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the PCFCWCD and City standards and shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs.

To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities.

Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. The Applicant shall verify that proposed BMPs are appropriate to treat the pollutants of concern from the proposed project and shall provide for the establishment of vegetation, where specified, by means of proper irrigation, for effective performance of BMPs. Maintenance of these facilities shall be provided by the City. Prior to project approval or Final Map approval, easements shall be created and offered for dedication to the City for maintenance and access to these facilities in anticipation of possible City maintenance. No water

459
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
31 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.8-4 (continued) quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

4.10 Noise

4.10-1 The
proposed
project would
increase traffic
noise levels at
existing noise-
sensitive land
uses in the
project vicinity.

4.10-1(a) The City shall work with Placer County and the Town of Loomis when Sierra College Boulevard is widened to four lanes from Taylor Road to Twelve Bridges Drive to encourage the use of rubber asphalt or an equally effective noise-suppressing surface.

City When
SCB
planned
for
widening
DSD

4.10-1(b) The City shall coordinate with Caltrans and/or South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA) when SR 193 is widened to four lanes from west of Sierra College Boulevard to encourage the use of rubber asphalt or an equally effective noise-suppressing surface.

City When SR
193
planned
for
widening
DSD

4.10-1(c) An acoustical analysis shall be prepared during design of the Oak Tree Lane extension which shall identify mitigation measures to ensure outdoor activity areas of nearby residences do not exceed 60 dB Ldn and indoor areas do not exceed 45 dB Ldn. The construction of Oak Tree Lane shall include one of more of the following measures as necessary to ensure that outdoor activity areas of nearby residents do not exceed 60 dB Ldn and indoor areas do not exceed 45 dB Ldn: increasing the distance of the road from the residences, berms, walls or a combination of such features and/or use of rubberized asphalt or similar materials.

City During
design of
Oak Tree
Lane
extension
DSD

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
460
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
32 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

4.10-2 The
proposed project
would expose
noise-sensitive
land uses to
construction
noise.

4.10-2(a) Construction hours shall be limited to 7am to 7pm, Monday through Friday (unless extended by special permit).

4.10-2(b) All internal combustion engines associated with stationary and mobile construction equipment shall have adequate mufflers equal to or better than those supplied with the equipment by the manufacturer.

4.10-2(c) Onsite construction staging areas shall be located as far as practical from existing residential areas.

4.10-2(d) Advance notice shall be provided to all residences located within 300 feet of extensive compaction activities, including the approximate start date and duration of such compaction activities.

Applicant C PSD, DSD

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.10-4 The
proposed
project would
contribute to
cumulative
increases in
traffic noise
levels.

4.10-4 The City shall coordinate with Caltrans and/or South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA) when Sierra College Boulevard is widened to four lanes south of SR 193 to encourage the use of rubber asphalt or an equally effective noise-suppressing surface.

City When
SCB
planned
for
widening
DSD

4.10-5 The
proposed project
could expose
future noise-
sensitive land
uses within the
Village 1 Specific
Plan area to
elevated traffic
noise levels.

4.10-5(a) Any residential development proposed within the 60-65 dB Ldn contour distances of Table 4.10-12, as measured from roadway centerline, shall include one of the following measures to ensure traffic noise does not exceed acceptable limits at the exterior and interior spaces of the residences:
i) The setback from the roadway shall be increased to locate the primary outdoor activity area beyond the 60 dB Ldn contour.

OR
ii) The primary outdoor activity areas shall be located on portions of the property that are shielded from view of the roadway(s).

OR
iii) Noise barriers shall be constructed of sufficient height to intercept line of sight between the primary outdoor activity areas and roadway(s) in question. Such barriers could take the form of earthen berms, solid walls, or a combination of the two.

Applicant G DSD
461
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
33 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.10-5
(continued)
OR
iv) The residential structures shall be located between the primary outdoor activity area and subject roadway(s).

4.10-5(b) Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation shall be provided to allow occupants to close doors and windows as desired for acoustical isolation from elevated traffic noise levels.

Applicant B DSD

4.10-5(c) Any residential development proposed within the 65-70 dB Ldn contour distances of Table 4.10-12, as measured from roadway centerline, shall include all of the following measures in addition to those specified in MM 4.10-5(b) to ensure traffic noise does not exceed acceptable limits at the exterior and interior spaces of the residences:
i) Noise barriers shall be designed of sufficient height to reduce exterior noise levels to 60 dB Ldn or less in primary outdoor activity areas.

AND
ii) All windows and sliding glass doors from which the subject roadways are visible shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 32.

AND
iii) Exterior wall construction shall be stucco siding, or wood siding with a 3/4 inch shear under-layer, or the acoustic equivalent.

AND
iv) All exterior wall cavities shall be fully insulated.

Applicant G, B DSD

4.12 Public Services

4.12-7 The
proposed project
would generate
demand for park
and recreation
facilities.

4.12-7 The project applicant shall pay all applicable fair-share fees to the City pursuant to the established Park In-Lieu Fee Program and the applicable Public Facilities Element fees program to fund the provision of recreational facilities to meet demands created by Phase 1 development.

Applicant B DSD
462
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
34 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.13 Public Utilities

4.13-1 The
proposed project
would increase
the demand for
water supplies.

4.13-1(a) Prior to recordation of each Final Map for each subsequent project, the City of Lincoln shall obtain necessary entitlements demonstrating there will be adequate water supply to serve the portion of the proposed project defined on the Final Map, in accordance with Government Code Section 66473.7(a)(1) – SB 221 Written Verification of Water Supply. The commitment for service will require execution of a service order agreement, and the City shall collect necessary fees at the time of building permit issuance.

Applicant I DSD, PSD

4.13-1(b) Prior to the approval of the 1,200th connection to the City’s water system or a demand of 1,500 gpm within Village 1 and/or Village 2, whichever occurs first, the City shall ensure the following four improvements, or equally effective improvements for distribution, have been completed and are operational:
i) new 30-inch pipeline, to be owned by PCWA, connecting the 42-inch pipeline in the Catta Verdera 5 MG storage tank area to the City Pond Area, ii) new PCWA-owned metering station at the City Pond site, similar to the existing PCWA metering station at the Catta Verdera 5 MG tank site, to provide surface water deliveries to the City from the new 30-inch PCWA pipeline, iii) City-owned 16-inch high pressure pipeline to supply portions of the Catta Verdera development by gravity from the new PCWA metering station at the City Pond site so the current City booster pumping station serving the area can be placed on standby,
iv) City-owned 36-inch pipeline that will connect the new PCWA metering station to the existing 24-inch pipeline in Twelve Bridges Drive and the existing 30-inch pipeline to supply the Reservoir 1 tank sites from the new PCWA metering station.

City Prior to
1,200th
connection
DSD

4.13-1(c) Prior to the cessation of the 2004 Temporary Agreement, the City shall provide for its fair share funding of the design and construction of Phase 1 of the NID RWSP 10-mgd treatment facility and associated storage and transmission facilities.

Funding shall be timed to ensure that water from the RWSP will be available at the point at which PCWA no longer treats and conveys NID water under the 2004 Temporary Agreement.

City Prior to
cessation
of
temporary
agreement

463
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
35 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.13-2 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
demand for
treated water
supplies and
distribution.

4.13-2 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.13-1(b) and (c). See MM 4.13-1(b)

4.13-5 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
wastewater
generation
requiring
conveyance to
and treatment at
the WWTRF.

4.13-5 Prior to approval of the first Final Small Lot Map for the first planning area developed in the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan, the City shall ensure the planned expansion of the WWTRF provides adequate capacity to accommodate flows from the programmatic portion of the project site. The project applicants shall pay fair-share cost of required fees to fund the expansion of the WWTRF.

City I DSD

4.13-8 The
proposed project
would use
energy for
construction and
operation.

4.13-8 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.3-1, 4.3-2, 4.6-1, and 4.13-12. See MMs 4.3-1, 4.3-2, 4.6-1 and 4.13-12

4.13-12
Construc
tion of the
proposed project
would generate
demolition waste
and construction
debris.

4.13-12 Prior to issuance of building permits for each individual project, project applicants shall prepare a waste management plan to divert at least 50 percent of the construction materials generated during construction of the particular project to ensure compliance with CALGreen requirements.

Applicant G DSD

4.14 Transportation and Circulation

4.14-1 The
proposed project

4.14-1 The City shall construct the following improvements prior to the service level degrading to LOS D and/or when signal warrants are met. These improvements City in
accordanc

DSD, PSD
464
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
36 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
would increase
traffic at
intersections
within the City of
Lincoln.
shall be incorporated into the City’s PFE fee program or other appropriate fee program. If there are not enough funds to construct the improvements when they are needed, then the applicant shall provide the necessary funding, subject to reimbursement as PFE fees are collected from City development projects. a) Signalize the intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road and Ingram Parkway or widen Ferrari Ranch Road to four through lanes when the LOS approaches D and/or signal warrants are met.
b) Signalize the intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road and Sun City Boulevard or, for Phase 1 only, widen Ferrari Ranch Road to four lanes when the LOS approaches D and/or signal warrants are met.
e with
mitigation

4.14-1(c) Signalize the intersection of Twelve Bridges Drive and Sierra College Boulevard when the LOS approaches D and/or signal warrants are met.

City When
signal
warrants
met
DSD

4.14-3 The
proposed project
would increase
traffic on
roadways
outside the City
of Lincoln.

4.14-3 If and when the Town of Loomis becomes a participant in SPRTA and/or the City and the Town enter into a reciprocal agreement for payment of fees to offset traffic impacts, the proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward the widening of Sierra College Boulevard to four lanes from the Town of Loomis limits to Taylor Road.

City, Loomis If and
when
Loomis
joins
SPARTA
and/or
enters
agreement
with the
City of
Lincoln
DSD

4.14-4 The
proposed project
would increase
traffic on impact
a.m. and p.m.
peak hour level
of service on
freeways under
Existing Plus
Project
conditions.

4.14-4 The City shall work with Caltrans on the timing of an additional mainline lane is constructed on SR 65 northbound between I-80 and Galleria Boulevard.

City, Caltrans O PSD
465
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
37 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.14-7 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
traffic at
intersections
outside the City
of Lincoln.

4.14-7(a) The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward restriping to create a separate westbound right turn lane and northbound acceleration lane at the intersection of Sierra College Boulevard & English Colony Way (2030 and 2050).

Applicant Payment
of
SPARTA
fees
DSD

4.14-7(b) If and when the Town of Loomis becomes a participant in SPRTA and/or the City and the Town enter into a reciprocal agreement for payment of fees to offset traffic impacts, the proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward restriping to create a second southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Sierra College Boulevard & King Road (2030 and 2050).

Applicant If and
when
Loomis
joins
SPARTA
and/or
enters
agreement
with the
City of
Lincoln

DSD, PSD

4.14-7(c) The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward eliminating southbound U- turns on Wildcat Boulevard and providing a right turn “overlap” signal phase on westbound West Stanford Ranch Road (2030).

Applicant If and
when the
cities of
Rocklin
and
Lincoln
enter
agreement

DSD, PSD

4.14-7(d) The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward providing a second eastbound left turn lane on Ranch View Drive at its intersection with Wildcat Boulevard (2030).

Applicant If and
when the
cities of
Rocklin
and
Lincoln
enter
agreement

DSD, PSD
466
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
38 Village 1 Specific Plan: Parkwood Project

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – PARKWOOD PROJECT
September 2025

Impact

Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.14-8 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
traffic on local
roadways
outside the City
of Lincoln.

4.14-8 The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward the widening of Sierra College Boulevard to 6 lanes if and when this improvement is included in the SPRTA fee program. (2030 and 2050).

Applicant If and
when
improveme
nt is
included in
SPARTA
fee

DSD, PSD

4.14-9 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
traffic levels on
freeways.

4.14-9 The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward the construction of an auxiliary lane on SR 65 Bypass Southbound from Ferrari Ranch Road to Lincoln Boulevard if and when the improvement is added to the SPRTA fee program and/or an agreement for collection of such fees is entered into by the City and Caltrans. (2030)
Applicant If and
when
improveme
nt is
included in
SPARTA
fee

DSD, PSD

Abbreviations

Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department I = Prior to Construction Drawing Approval G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit Approval
P = Pre-Construction/Grading
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFG = California Department of Fish and Game
PCDEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

467
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-
A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING THE SMALL LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE PARKWOOD PROJECT (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 021-274-071) (APPLICANT: JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC / PROPERTY OWNER: PARKWOOD

HOLDINGS, LLC)
W
HEREAS, Title 17, Chapter 17.04 et seq. of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review and recommendations of the City Council on all Tentative Maps; and W
HEREAS, on September 17, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, and recommended approval to the City Council; and W
HEREAS, notices describing the proposed Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Parkwood Project were sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to the Lincoln Municipal Code Section 17.16.150 and notice of the hearing was published in accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City of Lincoln at least ten calendar days before the City Council’s public hearing; and W
HEREAS, prior to recommending approval of the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report and adopted a Resolution approving the Addendum to the Village 1 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2010102018), as the proposed project is consistent with the type and intensity of land uses analyzed in the Final EIR, and no new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts have been identified. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as revised on September 26, 2023, and Alternatives, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted as part of the Final EIR are still applicable to the proposed project, sub ject to the modified mitigation measure language found within the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report; and
W
HEREAS, the Parkwood Project includes all of the following entitlements: the California Environmental Quality Act Resolution and this Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Resolution; and
W
HEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Parkwood Project and conducted a public hearing.

N
OW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
468
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 2 of 4 ends

Section 1. This Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Parkwood Project, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, relative to the proposed development of the Parkwood Project on certain real property consisting of 20.9 acres located in the western portion of Village 1 (APN 021 -274-071), which is part of the Village 1 Specific Plan area and within the incorporated area of the City of Lincoln.

Section 2. Pursuant to Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows:

a. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Parkwood Project is consistent with the Lincoln General Plan and the Village 1 Specific Plan becau se the Tentative Subdivision Map provides for the subdivision of the plan area in preparation of development in accordance with the General Plan land use designations. Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and the Village 1 Specific Plan, the s pecific lots are identified for Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR) that will help meet the City's housing needs for projected future growth. This planned development will be supported by adequate public services and utilities.

b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision of the Parkwood Project is consistent with the General Plan and Village 1 Specific Plan because adequate infrastructure and services will be extended to the property and available to serve the demand for services generated by the residential development, including water, sanitary sewer, storm drain facilities, dry utilities and roadways. The Developer will work with the Police Department to ensure adequate security measures are incorporated into the Project. The Developer will install fire protection measures and emergency access in accordance with the City's standards.

c. The site is physically suitable for the types of development proposed for the Parkwood Project because the proposed lot configuration is designed to avoid se nsitive vegetation and wildlife resources. An erosion control plan, a complete drainage system plan, and a water quality control plan shall be prepared and incorporate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") requirements to protect water quality. The proposed subdivision will include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage crossings in accordance with City standards to prevent blockage of high flows and associated erosion. Each phase of project construction will addr ess 100-year and 200 -year flood conditions as appropriate. With respect to sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources, extensive open space and habitat areas are included in the Project and will be preserved and maintained to avoid or mitigate impacts to such resources.

d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development as discussed in Finding c. above.
469
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 3 of 4 ends

e. Pursuant to the requirements of the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008, the City Council finds that the property is located within a watershed with a contributing area of 10 or fewer square miles, as determined by the City.

f. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because potential Parkwood Project impacts related to the environment will be mitigated to less -than-significant levels, where feasible, in addition to other specific measures set forth above in Finding c.

g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems since water, sewer, police, fire and solid waste services will be adequately provided to the development.

h. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through our use of property within the proposed subdivision. Adequate open space is located immediately adjacent to the residential development and will be accessible to the public.

i. The Parkwood Project area is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.

Section 3. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Parkwood Project is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. These conditions support the findings made by this City Council set forth herein.

Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Parkwood Project, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, subject to the attached exhibits.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor
470
Resolution No. 2025-

Page 4 of 4 ends

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

Exhibits:

A. Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval B. Parkwood Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Plan Set (Sheets 1 through 4), dated September 30, 2025

471
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 1 of 27 ends

The Parkwood Small Lot Tentative Subdivision is located within Village-1 Specific Plan Area, just north of the Hidden Hills Subdivision within the City of Lincoln, Assessor’s Parcel Number 021-274-071, is approved subject to the following conditions of approval:
* (Single Asterisk) located in front of the Condition is a Modified Standard Condition ** (Double Asterisk) located in front indicates a New Condition Specific to the Parkwood Tentative Subdivision Map Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. All development within the Parkwood subdivision is subject to compliance with Mitigation Measures contained within Village-1 Specific Plan EIR and Final Supplemental EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2010102018).

General
Condition
Community
Development

2. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, its Planning Commission, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.

General
Condition
Community
Development

3. The Applicant shall pay the City’s actual costs of providing entitlement processing Plan review, Final Map review, GIS, administrative fee, and inspection services. This may be a combination of staff costs and direct billing for contract professional services.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

472
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 2 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

4. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln, as per requirements of the approved Village-1 Specific Plan, and the Infrastructure & Public Facilities Financing Plan, which incorporates changes associated with this tentative map for the Applicant. Such Development Agreement shall be executed prior to City Council approval of any Final Map and may establish obligations to be completed prior to approval of any Final Map.

General
Condition/Prior
to Final Map
approval

City of Lincoln

5. All improvements required for the Parkwood Tentative Subdivision Map shall be designed and constructed to conform to the City of Lincoln Municipal Code, Section 17, Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards or as modified by these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer and/or Community Development Director.

Improvement
Plans/Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

6. As set forth in the City’s Public Facilities Element Fee (PFE program), the project is subject to Infrastructure and Capital Facility Impact Fees categories, including but not limited to, Wastewater Fee; Reclaimed or Raw Water Fee; Drainage Fee; Water Fee; Transportation Fee; and Community Services Fees which includes Parks, City Administration, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, and Library.

General
Condition
Support
Services

7. * The Parkwood Tentative Subdivision Map shall be subject to those provisions set forth in the approved Village-1 Specific Plan (adopted by Resolution No. 2012-197, dated November 27, 2012), Specific Plan Amendments, and General Development Plan for the Village-1 Plan Area (adopted by Ordinance No. 873B), as amended by Ordinance No. 886B and 1070B, and as may be subsequently amended.

General
Condition
Community
Development

8. *The conditions of approval for the Small Lot Tentative Map and exhibit Maps dated 9/30/2025 supersede any conflicting notations and information which may be shown on said Maps.

General
Condition
Community
Development

473
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 3 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

9. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map approval is valid for four (4) years from the date of City Council approval, unless an extension of time is subsequently approved per Government Code Section 66452.6(e), or extended by the terms of a Development Agreement.

General
Condition
City of Lincoln

10. * All improvements and construction within the project shall be consistent with the approved Village-1 Specific Plan Amendment, General Development Plan, Development Agreement, and Tentative Subdivision Map approved by the City Council.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

11. Applicant may file multiple final maps prior to the expiration of the tentative map.

Phasing of the final maps will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

DEVELOPMENT STUDIES/MITIGATION

12. * The design of onsite and backbone water system improvements shall comply with the approved Backbone Water System of the adopted Village-1 Specific Plan Amendment, and Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan.

Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

13. ** The design of onsite wastewater system improvements, and the offsite lift station alternative, if proposed, shall be consistent with the approved tentative subdivision map and with the approved Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan to ensure onsite sewer system is sized to accommodate offsite sheds. If the development is served by a lift station, Applicant shall be required to provide an ongoing funding mechanism for the operation, maintenance and replacement of the lift station only if such cost is not already included in the Village 1 Plan Area fees. No PFE credit shall be given for the lift station unless such cost is included by existing City utility rates.

Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

474
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 4 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

14. ** The design of the onsite storm drainage system improvements shall comply with the Village 1 Masterplan Drainage Analysis, and consistent with the Parkwood Drainage Analysis Technical Memorandum prepared by Wood Rodgers, Inc., dated August 27, 2025. In addition, prior to the approval of improvement plans, the Applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the onsite drainage system does the following things:
a) Complies with Section 10 of the City Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, specifically Table 10-1, “Allowable Street Encroachments” and Section 10-2 for minimum pad elevations adjacent to designated floodplains and overland routing of flood flows;
b) Provides an overland release system in case the drainage system is plugged and prepare an analysis showing no adverse impacts to downstream properties for a 100-year storm event; and
c) Includes the pipe connecting the pond and the Lake in the storm drain calculations as noted on the preliminary drainage memo review letter dated August 1, 2025. (There is an existing pond downstream of the proposed open space Lot B, that is connected to the existing Lake downstream of the pond.)
Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

15. The Applicant shall submit a Storm Water Quality Plan (SWQP) with the first submittal of the improvement plans. This SWQP shall incorporate previous comments obtained during entitlement review to comply with the West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual, using updated SWQP templates, and the State MS4 permit or current State requirements.

Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

475
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 5 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

16. The Applicant shall submit a soils report amendment, if required, prepared by a soils engineer for the development, including the recreational facility and/or park site. The report shall identify any grading and/or foundation soil problems on the lots and recommend any necessary corrective action to be taken. The reports shall be submitted with the Grading Permit or Improvement Plans, whichever occurs first. The reports shall include sub-grade soil evaluation for roadway design and provide suggested structural road sections. The soils report shall provide soil characteristics and geologic information necessary for input into the SWQP templates if required by design criteria.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

17. For those improvements that affect regulated resources, the Applicant shall have secured all required Environmental and Mitigation Permits for improvements prior to City issuance of a grading permit or approval Improvement plans affecting the regulated resources.

Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
or approval of
Improvement
Plans that
affect any
regulated
resources.

Planning

STORM WATER QUALITY/GRADING/DRAINAGE

18. *The Improvement Plans shall include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts and outfall structures, and delineate treatment areas and volumes required at each drain outlet. Culvert sizes must meet the City of Lincoln design requirements and be approved by the City Engineer. Design temporary culverts over natural channels for any stream crossings used during the construction phase. Construction equipment and vehicles must not cross streams without a proper temporary culvert crossing.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
City Engineer
476
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 6 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

19. In accordance with the City’s most current standards, no disturbed surface or soil shall be left standing through a winter season without erosion control measures, such as re- vegetation of exposed slopes. Temporary erosion control measures (such as silt fences, staked straw bales, etc.) shall be employed at the base of disturbed slopes until re- vegetation is established.

Prior to
acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer

20. Design energy dissipaters where drainage outlets discharge on erodible soil or into natural drainage ways. Temporary dissipaters may be used for temporary storm runoff outlets during construction phases. Permanent dissipaters shall be included for permanent outlets, unless the Erosion Control Plan indicates that conditions render it unnecessary (subject to the approval of the City Engineer).

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

21. The Applicant shall submit a post construction Storm Water Quality Plan with the improvement plans. The project shall comply with the City Ordinance, California MS4 permit requirements including trash capture requirements or any other State mandated requirements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Compliance with the MS4 permit may result in the loss of lots.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

22. The design, maintenance, inspection, and reporting of all storm water systems, devices, and treatment systems by the Applicant shall be in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2013-0001-DWQ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Phase 2 Municipal General Permit No. CAS000004, Waste Discharge Requirements for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and any design guidance developed by the City.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
During
Construction
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

23. The Applicant shall submit a SWPPP and post construction Erosion Control Plan for each phase of construction for City approval. The Plan shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize and control the level of pollutants in storm water runoff released to off-site receiving waters. Specific techniques shall comply with adopted City Standards.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
During
Construction
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

477
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 7 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

24. The Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan for storm water quality & LID improvement facilities. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall contain, at a minimum but not limited to, a description of the constructed facilities, the design criteria, a description of the expected facility operation, a post construction Erosion Control Plan, a post construction Storm Water Quality Control Plan, and a description of maintenance activities required along with a schedule for each activity. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall also contain a description of sampling, testing, and reporting requirements. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall be subject to approval by the Public Services Department.

Prior to Final
Map Approval
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services

25. Subject to permits issued by the Placer County Environmental Health Department, locate and properly abandon all septic systems and wells.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
or as
determined on
Improvement
Plans
City Engineer

26. The Applicant shall submit Blasting Plans (if required) for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to commencing any on-site blasting activities. At a minimum, the Blasting Plan is to include a description of the work to be accomplished, a statement of the necessity to accomplish the work, a description of alternatives to blasting considered but rejected, a description of steps taken to avoid hard rock areas, safety measures to be implemented. The Blasting Plan is to coordinate blasting activities with the Police, Community Development Department, and Fire Departments and specify the time and duration proposed for the activity. The Applicant shall provide 72 hours notification to the above Departments of any scheduled blasting.

Prior to any
blasting
activities
Community
Development,
City Engineer,
Police, Fire

478
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 8 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

27. The Applicant shall provide a grading and erosion control security deposit in accordance with the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual.

Prior to the
issuance of the
Grading
Permit.

City Engineer

28. Temporary construction fencing, signage, and other devices shall be installed prior to grading on-site. Perimeter construction fence locations shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to start of grading.

Prior to
Grading
City Engineer

29. Trees removed during site grading and construction shall be disposed of by means other than landfill or burning.

Prior to
Grading
City Engineer

30. Trees not scheduled for removal adjacent to construction areas shall be temporarily fenced around their drip lines to prevent inadvertent damage during construction activity.

Prior to
Grading
City Engineer

FLOODPLAIN/WETLANDS

31. All grading shown on the tentative map, including proposed pad elevations, shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Department in accordance with applicable City and FEMA requirements.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

TRANSPORTATION/STREET IMPROVEMENTS

32. *The configuration, location and timing of street improvements shall be as set forth in the approved tentative map, consistent with the Parkwood Development Agreement, adopted Village-1 Specific Plan & Amendment, and Village-1 Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

479
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 9 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

33. **Completion of improvement plans and construction or bonding of Silverado Trail and Oak Tree Lane improvements are required prior to approval of any Parkwood Final Subdivision Map.

Prior to
approval of
any Final Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer,
and Fire

34. Applicant shall show traffic striping, markings and signing on Improvement Plans as required by the applicable City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards, as well as the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, latest edition.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

35. The Applicant shall design ADA compliant ramps to allow movement of bicycles from sidewalks to on-street bike lanes where bike/trail routes merge with frontage sidewalks.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

36. Street names shall be reviewed and approved by the City. The Applicant shall work with the City to determine appropriate names to be incorporated into street names as feasible.

Prior to
approval of
Final Map
Planning

37. Applicant shall provide any necessary executed right of entry and easements from neighboring property owners prior to issuance of the grading permit when proposed grading impacts neighboring property.

Prior to
issuance of
Grading Permit

Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

UTILITIES

38. The Preliminary Utility Plan exhibits in the Tentative Map set showing pipe sizing and alignment for utilities are not approved for final design. The utility exhibits shall be updated by technical studies/reports and the Improvement Plans shall incorporate the findings of the technical studies, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

480
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 10 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

39. ** Applicant shall provide an east access street stub as per approved tentative subdivision map. In case this stub is not provided, Applicant shall dedicate a letter lot for utility easement purposes to accommodate all proposed wet utilities consistent with the approved tentative subdivision map.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & final
map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

40. If determined necessary by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall design and construct water sampling stations at locations approved by the City Engineer to allow for sampling of the water supply system, pursuant to the State of California and the City of Lincoln Design Criteria Section 8, if significant changes are to be proposed from the approved Tentative Map.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
and Public
Services

41. The Applicant shall pay for the cost of the City’s consultant to perform water modeling to assess the Fire Flows by including this Project water system into the City’s water model. Area hydraulic model will be used to simulate a maximum day plus fire flow condition at the demand junctions on the proposed distribution pipelines. The evaluation will be conducted assuming full buildout of the development.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

42. The Applicant shall comply with all provisions of the City’s Cross Control and Backflow Prevention Ordinance.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

43. The Applicant shall submit Joint Utility Trench Composite Plans for review by City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

481
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 11 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

44. *If construction a lift station is required, the Applicant shall dedicate utility easements for the construction of a utility access road and underground utilities required to serve the lift station, outside the Silverado Trail easement area. The maintenance access road shall be built per City Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
FIRE

45. The final design, layout and line capacity of water and hydrant systems shall be shown on the Improvement Plans and be subject to the approval of the City Engineer in consultation with the Fire Chief prior to start of any phase of underground utility construction.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and the
start of any
underground
construction
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

46. The final placement of fire hydrants shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Chief during the review of Improvement Plans and consistent with the most current improvement standards for the City.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department

47. Emergency access ways and pedestrian connections will be consistent with the locations provided in the approved Tentative Map. Any changes made shall be reviewed with Improvement Plans and be approved by the Fire Department, Community Development Department, and City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department

482
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 12 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

PARKS AND TRAILS

48. The Applicant shall prepare Improvement Plans for the dedicated parks, landscape corridors and other open space facilities, as per approved Parkwood Tentative Subdivision Map, consistent with the approved Village-1 Specific Plan and General Development Plan. Offsite landscape plans shall be approved with the Public Street Improvement Plans.

Prior to
approval of
Public
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

49. The Applicant shall design open fencing along all open space, drainage corridors, and parkways consistent with the General Development Plan, constructed in accordance with Plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer or designed and constructed as identified in the Army Corps of Engineers approved Open Space Management Plan.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map.

Community
Development
and City
Engineer

50. **Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, the Applicant shall design frontage landscaping and separated sidewalks along the proposed Silverado Trail (offsite) consistent with the approved Tentative Subdivision Map. Prior to approval of Final Map, Applicant shall construct or enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the construction of such landscaping and separated sidewalks.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map.

Community
Development
and City
Engineer

483
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 13 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

LANDSCAPING

51. *As specified in the Village-1 Specific Plan and Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan, Parkwood Landscape Plans shall include drought tolerant, low maintenance re-vegetation and landscaping plans and specifications for landscaped corridors/landscaped medians, common parking lots, prepared by a registered landscape architect. The Plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, City Engineer and the Public Services Director. The Plans shall be consistent with the General Development Plan and should blend the project into its natural environment and reflect a design which is sensitive to water use, fire hazards, wildlife and view sheds. The Plans shall include, but not be limited to: planting plans, species lists suited to Lincoln’s climate and soil conditions, Irrigation Plans and water usage calculations consistent with AB 1881 regarding water conservation, backflow devices for potable water uses, stabilization measures for cut and fill slopes and soil preparation methods.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map

Community
Development,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services

52. The Applicant shall prepare and process a landscape plan consistent with the adopted General Development Plan for Village-1 Plan Area. All residential Landscape Plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department.

Prior to
Issuance of 1st
Building Permit
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

53. Applicant shall apply to the Building Department for a building permit to erect any structure included on the civil and landscape improvement plans.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

484
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 14 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

LIGHTING/DESIGN

54. *A Street Lighting Plan shall be submitted to the City with Improvement Plans. All streetlights shall be LED and un-metered to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If located in a public right of way, street light shall be maintained by City and shall be approved by the City Engineer.

The selection of the private onsite streetlights and design of the lighting system shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer. Streetlight spacing within the MDR streets, onsite, will be per City standards, unless a deviation is approved by the City Engineer. Streetlights and similar fixtures shall be directed away from residences.

The street lighting foundation design shall be included with the Street Lighting Plan.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

55. ** Applicant shall submit a photometric plan to demonstrate street lighting provided meets the City of Lincoln Lighting Standards for coverage (Lumens) for all streets within the project unless a deviation to standards is approved.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

56. The Applicant shall review options with Community Development staff to minimize visual impacts and monotony in the design of any sound walls. If used, walls should be constructed of masonry and utilize graffiti resistant materials. Wall design and materials shall be subject City’s approval and according to the design standards in the approved Village-1 Specific Plan and General Development Plan.

Prior to
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Community
Development

485
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 15 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

IMPROVEMENT PLAN NOTES

57. Dust control measures shall be established prior to construction of any phase of development pursuant to the requirements of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan.

Additional dust control measures may be required by the City Engineer based upon site conditions.

The following note shall be added to the Grading and/or Improvement Plans:
“To minimize dust/grading impacts during construction, the Applicant shall:
a. Spray water on all exposed earth surfaces during clearing, grading, earth moving and other site preparation activities throughout the day.
b. Use tarpaulins or other affective covers on all stockpiled earth material and on all haul trucks.
c. Sweep the adjacent street frontages at least once a day or as needed to remove silt and other dirt which is evident from construction activities. d. Ensure that construction vehicles are cleaned prior to leaving the construction site to prevent dust and dirt from being tracked offsite.
e. The City shall have the authority to stop all grading operations, if in opinion of City staff, inadequate dust control measures are being practiced or excessive wind conditions contribute to fugitive dust emissions.
f. The grading shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program.” Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

58. A note shall be added to the Grading Plans that states:
“Prior to the commencement of grading operations, the contractor shall identify the site where the deficit earthen material shall be borrowed. A report issued by a geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to verify that the imported materials are suitable for project fill. If the borrow site is within the City of Lincoln, the contractor shall show proof of all approved Grading Plans. Haul routes to be used shall be approved by the City Engineer.”

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

486
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 16 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

59. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“Construction on the project shall take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, unless written approval is granted by the Community Development Department for private property and the City Engineer for mass grading and public improvements, allowing work for different days or hours.” “Radios and other musical equipment noise shall be played at levels consistent with the City of Lincoln standards so as to be contained onsite.”

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

60. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“All contractors are required to deliver all construction related refuse collected in debris boxes to the Western Placer Waste Management Authority Material Recovery Facility.” Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

61. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“Seventy-two (72) hour notification must be given to the City of Lincoln prior to disinfection of any water mains. The contractor shall coordinate with the City Construction Inspector to schedule with the Public Services Department at 434-2450 for disinfection and testing.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

62. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“The Applicant shall submit Environmental surveys in compliance with the mitigation measures. The Applicant shall secure Community Development Department (Planning) approval that surveys are adequate and mitigation measures are incorporated into the Plan prior to start of any onsite construction.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development

487
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 17 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

63. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“The Applicant shall require their contractors to work with the Police Department in the development of security measures during construction to increase security of stored equipment and materials on-site and to minimize demands on police protection services during project construction.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

64. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“All construction contractors shall provide a Spill Prevention and Counter Measure Plan describing measures to ensure proper collection and disposal of all pollutants handled or produced on the project site during construction, including sanitary wastes, cement, and petroleum products. The Plan shall be submitted to the City’s Fire Department and City Engineer prior to each phase of construction.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans for each
phase of
construction
Fire
Department
and City
Engineer

FINAL MAP

65. Applicant and City shall cooperate to obtain an easement dedicated to the City for public street and highway purposes along the project frontage for Silverado Trail (Oak Tree Lane to Lot B) located within the County owned parcel as per approved tentative subdivision map.

Prior to
approval of the
Final Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

66. Applicant shall dedicate a lettered lot of adequate width and access control between Lots 82 & 83 if the east connection to Leavell property has not been provided by the Leavell property owner.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

488
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 18 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

67. Prior to the approval of each Final Map, the Applicant shall enter into a standard City Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City identifying the public improvements, if any, to be constructed with each phase. The Applicant shall provide security, in one of the standard forms acceptable to the City Attorney and consistent with the Subdivision Map Act guaranteeing construction of the improvements. If any public improvements required by the City pursuant to this subdivision or local ordinance have not been completed and accepted in accordance with conditional approval of the tentative map, the City, as a condition precedent to the approval of the final map, shall require the subdivider to enter into a mutually agreeable terms to complete the improvements in a manner authorized by Government Code Sections 66462(a) and 66499.5.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development,
City Engineer

68. Arrangements shall be made by the Applicant during the review of Final Maps by the City for the abandonment of any existing easements and/or right-of-way no longer required as well as arrangements for the dedication of new easements and/or rights-or- way required to carry out project conditions of approval, as noted on the approved tentative subdivision map. Separate document easements required by the City shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and submitted for review by the City Surveyor, Community Development Department and City Engineer.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

69. The Landowner shall convey all groundwater rights to the City of Lincoln with the recordation of any Final Maps.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

70. The Owner shall dedicate public utility easements for underground facilities of a size established by City Standards and Specifications and consistent with the City’s franchise agreements as part of each Final Map.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

489
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 19 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

71. The words “traffic control appurtenances” shall be included on the cover sheet of Final Map in the list of utilities allowed in public utility easements (PUE’s) located along public roads.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

72. *Except for facilities maintained by a HOA, the Owner shall provide a funding mechanism for the annual maintenance and operation of public streets, streetlights, parks, landscaping, open space, water quality features, storm drain facilities, detention and retention facilities, lift station (if proposed) and traffic signals. This funding mechanism may consist of a Special Tax, Assessment District, or endowment, at the discretion of the City. Compliance with this condition shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Annually the costs will be allocated proportionately against the individual lots in accordance with the benefits received. Annual adjustments shall be applied in accordance with the Consumer Price Index plus 3% as determined by the City to adjust the assessment for inflation as needed to meet any actual increased costs.

Annexation into CFD 2018-1 could satisfy this condition.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development,
Support
Services and
City Engineer

490
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 20 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

73. The Applicant shall provide a funding mechanism for the additional demand on public safety and public library, etc. This funding may consist of annexation to CFD 2018-2 or other funding mechanism as is acceptable to the City. A fiscal impact analysis should be completed to ensure the project will cover the costs of the additional services needed.

Compliance with this condition shall be to the satisfaction of the Finance Director, Community Development Director. Annually the costs will be allocated proportionately against the individual lots in accordance with the benefits received. Annual adjustments shall be applied in accordance with the Consumer Price Index plus 3% as determined by the City to adjust the assessment for inflation as needed to meet any actual increased costs.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Finance
Director,
Community
Development,
and City
Engineer

74. The Applicant will participate in the City’s Public Facilities Element (PFE) Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of each building permit.

Issuance of
Each Building
Permit
Community
Development

75. The project is subject to the Village 1 Specific Plan Infrastructure Master and Finance Plan Area Fee, or the Interim Fee Agreement for the Village 1 Specific Plan Infrastructure Financing Plan, whichever is in effect at the time of first Final Map approval.

Prior to first
Small-Lot Final
Map approval
Planning &
Development
Engineering

76. The Applicant shall provide to the Community Development Department copies of each small lot Final Map upon City Engineer’s approval and prior to City Council approval:
• Two digital copies of the Final Map in DWG format compatible with the City’s mapping and PDF
• One plot or print of the submittal
Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

77. Prior to City approval of any final map, the Applicant shall file with the Placer County Clerk, a certificate from the Placer County Tax Collector’s Office indicating that no liens against the subdivision or any part thereof exist for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local taxes or special assessments collected with taxes, except those not yet due and payable.

Prior to Final
Map Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

491
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 21 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

78. After recordation of any Final Map, the Applicant shall provide to the City Engineer one copy of the recorded Final Map.

Immediately
after
recordation of
Final Map
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

79. Dedicate rights of ways and easements for public improvements, open space and parks lots shown on the Small Lot Final Map/s and construct those improvements or enter into a subdivision improvement agreement and post bonds/security, pursuant to Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Concurrent
with filing the
Small Lot Final
Maps with the
City Council.

Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

80. Tentative subdivision map indicates existing IOD’s granted to the City but not accepted.

City will accept the IODs for public street & highway purposes only after improvements are designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and accepted by the City Council.

Concurrent
with filing of
the Final
Map/s with
the City
Council
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer

81. *The Development Agreement shall address the obligation of the Applicant to reimburse for facilities constructed by third parties which benefit the Applicant, if any.

Prior to
Recordation of
Final Map

Community
Development
& City
Engineer

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

82. The Applicant shall apply for and obtain an Encroachment Permit and bonding from the City Engineer prior to any work conducted within the existing & proposed public right- of-way.

Prior to
beginning
construction
City Engineer
492
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 22 of 27 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

83. The Applicant, before performing construction activities within the project area and prior to each phase of development, shall submit a construction schedule to the Fire Department to allow coordination of fire protection services during construction.

Prior to any
construction
activity
Fire
Department

84. The Applicant shall notify all dry utility service providers at the earliest available opportunity concerning applicable development plans, site improvements, and construction schedules. The Applicant shall maintain contact with the service providers so that required facilities and easements will be developed in a coordinated manner.

Prior to
construction of
utilities
City Engineer

85. An onsite meeting with the Applicant, contractor, superintendent, engineers, and City representatives to review special procedures, limits of work, lines of authority and special conditions or procedures shall take place prior to any significant grading activity.

The Applicant shall provide an organization chart displaying lines of authority and phone numbers for each individual shown in a supervisory capacity. The Applicant shall designate in writing before the start of work an authorized representative who will have authority to act on behalf of the project. Said representative should be available on the job site during all construction or accessible by phone. The representative shall also make any necessary arrangements with the City Engineer concerning extended or emergency work periods.

Prior to any
onsite grading
work
City Engineer

86. All construction haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to commencement of any construction activity.

Prior to any
construction
City Engineer

87. The Applicant shall coordinate the placement of centralized mail delivery units, if required by the Post Office or provide verification that centralized mail delivery units will not be required by the Post Office. The placement of the units, if required by the Post Office, shall give consideration to concepts of defensible space, such as street lighting and visibility, ADA accessibility, as well as consumer convenience. The centralized mail delivery units shall not be located within any of the water quality LID areas identified on the Subdivision Map and/or Improvement Plans.

Prior to any
construction
Community
Development

493
Exhibit A
Parkwood- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 23 of 27 ends

Lincoln City CouncilOctober 28, 2025

Lincoln City Council
October 28, 2025