of the PFE Facilities, (ii) traffic control, staging , and storm water pollution prevention implementation measures (i.e., structural BMPs) related to such construction, and (iii) habitat mitigation required as a mitigation measure in connection with the construction of such PFE Facilities. Hard Costs shall include the costs of any changes in scope or standards required by the City during the course of construction thereof that are added to the Construction Contract. “Eligible Hard Costs” means all of the Hard Costs incurred by the Constructing Owner to construct the PFE Facilities and approved by the City Engineer based on best available cost data and supporting documentation submitted by the Developer. In no event shall the PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid for Eligible Hard Costs. Constructing Owner shall provide documentation as required by the Administrator, which may include but is not limited to proof of payment and lien releases from all contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers for all costs for which it seeks credit or reimbursement under this Agreement.
“Soft Costs" could include the costs of planning, design , and financing of the PFE Facilities, storm water pollution prevention monitoring & management (i.e., non-structural BMPs), en gineering, inspection, geotechnical oversight and monitoring, testing, surveying, outside agency review fees, and bonding related to the construction of the PFE Facilities. “Eligible Soft Costs" means all of the Soft Costs incurred by the Constructing Owner to construct the PFE Facilities and approved by the City Engineer based on best available cost data and supporting documentation submitted by the Developer. In no event shall the PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid for Eligible Soft Costs. Constructing Owner shall provide documentation as required by the Administrator, which may include but is not limited to proof of payment and lien releases from all contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers for all costs for which it seeks credit or reimbursement under this Agreement.
PFE Fee Credits related to the construction of PFE Facilities subject to a final “true up" shall be equal to the Eligible Hard Costs and Eligible Soft Costs (collectively, the “Total Eligible Costs") and shall be initially set forth on Exhibit B upon execution of this Agreement.
In the event of any disagreement between the Constructing Owner and the Administrator on the initial calculation of the Total Eligible Costs, if all other conditions to the entry of this Agreeme nt have been satisfied, the Constructing Owner may elect to enter into this Agreement without having the amount of the Total Eligible Costs resolved and listed on Exhibit B. In such case, Constructing Owner’s right hereunder to apply any portion of the Total Eligible Costs (or the disputed amount thereof) will be deferred until such disagreement is resolved by the Constructing Owner and the City. If the Constructing Owner and the Administrator are unable to resolve any disputed amounts after the parties hav e engaged in good faith meetings and exchange of documents in support of their positions, the appeal provisions in Section 31 of this Agreement shall apply. The parties shall use their best efforts to resolve any such dispute within sixty (60) days of the cost document submission by the Constructing Owner.
Pending the resolution of any such dispute, the Constructing Owner shall pay any and all required PFE Fees and City shall retain any PFE Fees paid by the Constructing Owner after the Effective Date of this Agreement for potential refund upon resolution of such Total Eligible Cost dispute.
The amount of PFE Fee Credits retained pending resolution of any Total Eligible Cost dispute shall not exceed the disputed amount. Upon resolution of any Total Eligible Cost dispute, and within twenty (20) business days of resolution of the Total Eligible Cost dispute, the Administrator shall amend Exhibit B to provide the final amount of the PFE Fee Credits allowed hereu nder. Constructing Owner shall then have thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the amended Exhibit B to retroactively apply any portion of such PFE Fee Credit to the Project and obtain an equivalent refund of PFE Fees collected and retained from the Constructing Owner after the Effective Date of this Agreement pending the resolution of the Total Eligible Cost dispute. If Constructing Owner does not elect within such time to have any of the PFE Fee Credits applied to the Project, then any PFE Fees previously collected and retained from the Constructing Owner during such period shall remain eligible for future credit or reimbursement. 176
SECTION 6. PFE FEE CREDITS - APPLICATION, REIMBURSEMENT, OR TRANSFER
PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner; (1) may be applied towards PFE Fees related to the Project in accordance with the PFE Policy , or (2) may be requested for reimbursement from the applicable PFE account in accordance with the PFE Policy, or (3) may be transferred to another landowner within the Plan Area.
If Constructing Owner finances the PFE Facilities with bond proceeds from a Community Facilities District, the PFE Fee Credits must be applied towards the payment of PFE Fees for the Project or another eligible project, in accordance with the PFE Policy. Reimbursements from the applicable PFE account(s) are not permissible under this scenario.
SECTION 7. PRIORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR PFE FEE CREDITS
If the updated credit value determined by the “true-up” process described in Section 10 and the PFE Policy (the “Final Credit Value”) exceeds the PFE Fee obligation for the Project, the Constructing Owner may request reimbursement from the PFE Fee account corresponding to the PFE Fee Category in which the applicable credits were earned, subject to availability of funds as determined by the City.
Reimbursements shall be made on a “first -in, first-out” basis, with highest priority given to the PFE facilities and improvements with the earliest City acceptance date and with an approved PFE Credit Agreement. The Constructing Owner may also request to transfer the rights to PFE Fee Credits to another landowner within the Plan Area subject to approval from the City Manager, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld . To transfer the rights to PFE Fee Credits to a nother landowner within the Plan Area, the Constructing Owner must coordinate with the City to complete, approve, and execute the Certification and Assignment of Fee Credits included hereto as Exhibit C.
Requested reimbursements for excess PFE Fee Credits shall be paid out first for the PFE facilities and improvements with the earliest priorities as described above , until paid in full (i.e., the constructing owner of a PFE facility or improvement with an earlier priority shall receive all a vailable funds in the applicable PFE account until paid in full prior to any reimbursements being paid for a PFE facility or improvement with a later priority. If two or more constructing owners have the same priority (“Equal-Priority Constructing Owners”), after payment in full on any reimbursement for an earlier priority, the reimbursements to such Equal-Priority Constructing Owners shall be paid out pro rata based on the relative amount of the requested reimbursements due thereunder at the time of such p ayment. For example, if at the time of payment of any reimbursement hereunder, another constructing owner has requested reimbursements for a PFE facility or improvement with the same priority as the PFE Facilities under this Agreement, then such payment would be divided between the Constructing Owner and the other constructing owner in proportion to the relative amounts of the reimbursements then requested under the respective agreements.
In accordance with the applicable established priorities, the reimbursement hereunder shall be paid to Constructing Owner when the PFE Facilities are completed as determined by the City Engineer (“Completion”) and accepted by the City in writing, or such earlier date after Completion that the City Engineer deems appropriate. The reimbursement shall be paid by the City as fee revenues from the applicable PFE account are collected. After Completion of the PFE Facilities, such payments shall be made by the City at least quarterly throughout the year as funds become available.
The obligation arising from this Agreement is not a debt of the City, nor a legal or equitable pledge, charge, lien, or encumbrance, upon any of its property, or upon any of its income, receipts, or revenues, and is payable only and solely from the applicable PFE account. 177
SECTION 8. TRANSFER OF PFE FEE CREDITS
PFE Fee Credits are personal to the Constructing Owner and do not run with the Project that is generating such credits. Provided the Constructing Owner has no outstanding monetary obligation to the City within the Project, Constructing Owner may, at its sole option and discretion, assign the rights to the PFE Fee Credits , including the right to request reimbursements against the applicable PFE account, to any other landowner within the Plan Area, subject to the conditions and limitations herein regarding the application of such PFE Fee Credits.
If Constructing Owner has an outstanding monetary obligation to the City as noted above, then the City may requi re monetary obligation to be met before transfer of the PFE Fee Credit s owned by Constructing Owner. Any assignment of the rights to PFE Fee Credits shall be made in writing and delivered to the Administrator in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. Assigned PFE Fee Credits carry the same priority the assignor had in the PFE Fee Credits.
SECTION 9. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO PFE FEE CREDITS OR REIMBURSEMENTS
The PFE Fee Credits shall be adjusted on an annual basis and the estimated cost of the PFE Facilities shall be adjusted annually pursuant to the PFE Policy. The adjusted amount shall be used to determine the Total Eligible Costs for any credits or reimbursements applied or received until the next annual adjustment.
SECTION 10. "TRUE UP" OF PFE FEE CREDITS
Upon completion of the PFE Facilities by the Constructing Owner and acceptance thereof by the City, the final determination of actual Eligible Hard Costs upon which the PFE Fee Credits amount is based shall be determined by the City Engineer based on documentation thereof provided by Constructing Owner to the City Engineer’s reasonable satisfaction. For construction change orders to be given consideration for reimbursement, the Constructing Owner must:
Present the change order request and estimated cost along with supporting information to the City Engineer; and
Fully document any work performed under a change order to verify all associated costs.
Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the ineligibility of the requested change order for such PFE Fee Credits.
To secure final PFE Fee Credits, Constructing Owner shall provide the following items to the City Engineer in order fo r each to determine the actual Eligible Hard Costs and Eligible Soft Costs incurred by Constructing Owner for the PFE Facilities that qualify for PFE Fee Credits:
(1) Copies of the original Construction Contract and any change orders that have been agreed to by the Constructing Owner, contractor (s), and the City. The portion of each change order associated with the PFE Facilities must be itemized separately; (2) Copies of all invoices, with unconditional lien releases, submitted by the contractor and suppliers;
(3) Copies of all checks issued by the Constructing Owner with related invoices indicated;
178
(4) A summary tabulation of all contractor and supplier invoices and Constructing Owner payments; and
(5) Prevailing Wage Certification, or documentation acceptable to the City Attorney of an exception to the applicability of prevailing wage.
If, when the final reconciliation of Total Eligible Costs for the PFE Facilities is conducted by the Administrator, the actual Total Eligible Costs for the PFE Facilities exceeds the amount of PFE Fee Credits initially provided hereunder, the Administrator shall review items (1) through (4) above and determine if the actual Total Eligible Costs will serve as the basis for determination of the amount of the PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner should be increased above the amount described in Exhibit B of this Agreement. The City Engineer shall determine how much of the actual construction costs should be included in any increase to the Total Eligible Costs and Exhibit B shall be adjusted accordingly. However, in no event shall the Final Credit Value awarded to the Constructing Owner upon final reconciliation exceed the cost e stimate assumed for the PFE Facilities in the preparation of the PFE Nexus Study, including the annual inflationary adjustments applied as part of the PFE Fee Program.
If the final reconciliation determines that Total Eligible Costs are less than the amou nt of PFE Fee Credits initially provided hereunder, the Administrator shall notify the Constructing Owner of such reduction of the PFE Fee Credits and Exhibit B shall be revised accordingly. If the amount of PFE Fee Credits applied towards PFE Fees exceeds the final amount of Total Eligible Costs that supported such PFE Fee Credits, then the Constructing Owner shall pay the amount of the PFE Fee Credits that were applied in excess of the confirmed Total Eligible Costs within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of notice from the Administrator of the amount to be paid.
In no event shall PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid by the Constructing Owner for Total Eligible Costs. Any determination by the City Engineer under this Section shall be subjec t to the appeal rights set forth in Section 31 of this Agreement.
SECTION 11. FAILURE TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION
Failure to complete work within the scope of this Agreement may affect the priority status for the credit or reimbursement granted hereunder, may result in termination of the PFE Fee Credits and termination of the right to apply PFE Fee Credits, and may require payment of any PFE Fee Credits applied, as deemed appropriate by the Administrator. In connection therewith, the Administrato r may determine that the Constructing Owner shall not be entitled to further PFE Fee Credits until City acceptance of the PFE Facilities as determined by the City Engineer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. A change in the priority for any reimbursement will be evaluated from the previously determined priority to the date of acceptance, which may affect priority for the reimbursement. Any determination by the Administrator to invoke the provisions of this Section shall be subject to the appeal rights set forth in Section 31 of this Agreement.
SECTION 12. INSPECTION
City and its authorized representatives shall, at all times, have access to the construction site during construction of the PFE Facilities and Constructing Owner shall furnish City with all reasonable information necessary for ascertaining full knowledge of the PFE Facilities with respect to the progress, workmanship, and character of materials and equipment used and employed in the work.
179
Whenever the contractors retained by Constructing Owner vary from the normal period during which work or any portion of it is carried out on each day, Constructing Owner shall give timely notice to the City Engineer so that , if he or she wishes, he or she may be present to o bserve the work in progress. If Constructing Owner fails to give such timely notice, any work done in the absence of a City representative will be subject to rejection. Constructing Owner shall give timely notice to the City Engineer in advance of backfill ing or otherwise covering any part of the work so that the City ’s representative may, if he or she wishes, observe the work before it is concealed.
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, all PFE Facilities shall be subject to City inspection for compliance with City requirements prior to issuance of a Letter of A cceptance from the City Engineer. Observation of the work or inspection by the City shall not relieve the Constructing Owner or its sureties of full responsibility for defective materials or workmanship or any of its obligations to complete construction in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer.
SECTION 13. COMPLIANCE WITH PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
Unless otherwise authorized by City Charter, City ordinance, or applicable State statutory or common law, pursuant to the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1, Part 7, Division II of the Labor Code of the State of California (Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws")), all work shall be performed in compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holidays and o vertime work, for each craft, classification , or type of worker needed to execute the work contemplated under this Agreement shall be paid to all workers, laborers, and mechanics employed in the execution of said work by the Constructing Owner or the Constructing Owner’s contractor, or by any subcontractor doing or contracting to do any part of said work. The appropriate determination of the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations shall be filed by the Constructing Owner with, and made available for inspection at, the office of the City Clerk.
Constructing Owner shall require all contractors to register with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5. Constructing Owner shall requ ire its contractor to post, at each jobsite, a copy of such prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations. No PFE Fee Credits shall be permissible without full compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
SECTION 14. INSURANCE
Constructing Owner shall require its contractor to carry and maintain for three (3) years after City acceptance of the PFE Facilities, such public liability, property damage and contractual liability, auto, Workers’ Compensation, Builders’ Risk Insurance and other insurance coverage as required by the City in accordance with the improvement plan specifications for the PFE Facilities. The contractor shall name the City as an additional insured. For any claims related to the PFE Facilities, the contractor’s general liability and automobile insurance coverage shall be primary insurance in their coverage of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers, and any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents , or volunteers shall be excess of the contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
SECTION 15. ACCEPTANCE AND CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES
Once Constructing Owner has completed construction of the PFE Facilities and the PFE Facilities are deemed satisfactory by the City Engineer following City inspection, the City Engineer may recommend that City Council accept the PFE Facilities, including all associated easements and offers 180
of dedication, provided that all liens, claims , and encumbrances in connection with the PFE Facilities have been released and the required warranty bond has been provided to the City. No acceptance shall be valid without the Constructing Owner conveying and vesting full, complete, and clear title in said PFE Facilities to the City at the time of acceptance.
SECTION 16. LIENS, CLAIMS, AND ENCUMBRANCES
Prior to the City’s acceptance of any PFE Facilities, Constructing Owner shall clear any and all liens, claims, and encumbrances from said PFE Facilities as a condition of acceptance by the City.
SECTION 17. DELIVERY OF AS-BUILT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Prior to acceptance of the PFE Facilities by City, Constructing Owner shall deliver to City copies of all as-built plans (if any), specifications, operating manuals, service manuals, warranties , and other documents relating to the design, construction, and operation of the PFE Facilities described in this Agreement. Upon acceptance of the PFE Facilitie s, City shall file Notice of Completion with Placer County.
SECTION 18. INDEMNIFICATION
The Constructing Owner, by execution of this Agreement, specifically agrees to protect and assume the defense of, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its elected representatives, officers, employees, agents , and consultants (the "Indemnitees"), from and against all liabilities, actions, lawsuits, damages, claims, losses, or expenses of every type and description, including attorneys’ and consultants’ fees and expenses, (collectively, “Liabilities"), to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of or resulting from the design, construction, or installation of the PFE Facilities, except to the extent the Liabilities arise from the sole negligence, or willf ul misconduct of the City and/or the Indemnitees. This indemnification shall extend to Liabilities occurring after this Agreement is terminated as well as while it is in force. Notwithstanding the foregoing, following the acceptance of the improvements by the City, or if there is an applicable warranty, following the end of any applicable warranty period, the Constructing Owner shall not be obligated to indemnify the Indemnitees for Liabilities to the extent that such Liabilities arise from Indemnitees ’ active or passive negligence following acceptance of the PFE Facilities.
SECTION 19. THIRD PARTY LIABILITY
City does not assume any liability, duty , or obligation to Constructing Owner ’s contractors, subcontractors, agents , or any person or entity not a party to this Agreement by execution or performance of this Agreement, and no contractors, subcontractors, agents , or any parties are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement.
SECTION 20. WARRANTY
Constructing Owner hereby warrants the PFE Fac ilities as to materials, design , and workmanship and should any defect or failure of the PFE Facilities, or any parts thereof, occur within a period of one (1) year after final acceptance by City, Constructing Owner shall promptly cause the needed repairs to be made without any expense or cost to the City. Final acceptance shall be deemed to have occurred under this Agreement when the PFE Facilities have been accepted by the City pursuant to a written acceptance from the City Engineer and is placed into actual service. City shall provide written notification to Constructing Owner of final acceptance by the City.
181
City is hereby authorized to make repairs if Constructing Owner fails to make, or undertake with due diligence, the aforesaid repairs within twenty (20) calendar days after it is given written notice of such defect or failure. In case of emergency, where in the opinion of the City Engineer delay may cause serious hazard to the public, the necessary repairs may be made by the City without prior notice to Constructing Owner. All costs of the repair, if not paid by the Constructing Owner within twenty (20) calendar days of notice from the Administrator to the Constructing Owner, shall be paid out of the Warranty Bond. In no event shall the City be responsible for the cost of the repair within the warranty period. In all cases of defect or failure within the warranty period where the City has taken action in accordance with this paragraph, Constructing Owner shall promptly reimburse City and, if applicable, the Warranty Bond shall fund the repair for any and all costs or expenses, direct or indirect, incurred by the City. The foregoing is in addition to, and shall not in any way limit or affect, the rights of the Cit y to enforce the warranty obligations of Constructing Owner hereunder and to recover any and all costs thereof from the warranty bond posted thereby.
SECTION 21. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
Each and every provision of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto, in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein.
SECTION 22. ATTORNEY’S FEES
If any suit, action or proceeding in law or equity (except for the dispute resolution process set forth herein) is brought to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees.
SECTION 23. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT
Constructing Owner and City certify that they have the authority and ar e legally empowered to enter into this Agreement on behalf of their entity and to bind their party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
SECTION 24. NOTICES
Any notices, requests, demands , or other communications required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally (FedEx and similar services, each of which is hereinafter called an “Express Courier,” shall be considered to be personal service) or by telephone facsimile or other electronic transmission (provided that the sender of a telephone facsimile or other electronic transmission has received confirmation of successful transmission by the sending fax machine), and upon receipt, if mailed to the p arty to whom notice is to be given, by first -class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and properly addressed as follows:
(a) If to City:
City of Lincoln
Attn: City Engineer
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone: (916) 434-2400
Facsimile: (916) _________
182
With a copy to:
City of Lincoln
Attn: City Attorney
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone: (916) 434-2400
Facsimile: (916) _________
(b) If to Constructing Owner:
JEN California 24, LLC
Attn: ____________
___________________
___________________
Tel: ___-___-____
Either party may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such changes to the other party in the manner provided herein.
SECTION 25. NOTICE OF CONTRACTORS
Constructing Owner shall provide a copy of this Agreement to any contractors, subcontractors, or other parties performing work on the PFE Facilities, prior to commencement of construction by said party.
SECTION 26. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall start on the day and year duly executed by all parties and shall remain in effect until all the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement have been satisfied.
SECTION 27. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
SECTION 28. CONFLICTS
This agreement is intended to implement and be consistent with the requirements of the PFE Policy. Therefore, in the event of any conflicts between the PFE Policy and this Agreement, the requirements of the PFE Policy shall prevail and control.
SECTION 29. EXHIBITS
The Exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties regarding the subject matter hereof. The Agreement may be amended only by writing executed by both parties. 183
SECTION 31. RIGHT OF APPEAL
The Constructing Owner may appeal any final determination by the Administrator to the City Manager and thereafter to the City Council. Prior to submitting the matter to the City Council, the City Manager may, in his/her discretion, elect to engage the services of a mediator to attempt to mediate the dispute in a non-binding fashion, not to exceed a total of thirty (30) calendar days. Any decision of the City Council shall be final with no right of further appeal or action thereafter.
SECTION 32. EFFECTIVE DATE
The City ’s execution of this Agreement shall be contingent upon confirmation by the City Engineer that (i) Construction Contract h as been properly bid and entered into for construction of the PFE Facilities, (ii) performance and payment bonds have been posted in form and amount required by the City, and (iii) a Notice to Proceed has been given to the contractor for the PFE Facilities. The date of such execution by the City, based in part on the City’s confirmation of the satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, shall be deemed to be the “Effective Date" of this Agreement. Upon execution of this Agreement by the City, the City shall insert the Effective Date in the Preamble to this Agreement and provide a copy of this fully executed and dated Agreement to the Constructing Owner.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
184
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above-written.
CITY: THE CONSTRUCTING OWNER:
CITY OF LINCOLN, JEN California 24, LLC,
a municipal corporation a California limited liability company
By: By:
Sean Scully Name:
Its: City Manager Title:
ATTEST:
By:
Hope Ithurburn
Its: City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By:
Vin Cay
Its: City Engineer
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By:
Nita Wracker
Its: Finance Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Douglas White
Its: City Attorney
185
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT A
PFE FACILITIES
ENGINEER’S PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
PFE
Item
PFE Facility
Description
PFE Estimate
of Cost1
R-70 Intersection of Joiner Parkway and Nicolaus Road $206,049 N/A² Trail/Open Space Improvements $117,905
$323,954
1 Based on the amounts estimated in the PFE Nexus Study for each PFE Item, prorated by the percentage of the PFE Facility constructed or caused to be constructed by the Constructing Owner.
The PFE Estimate of Cost includes 50% of construction costs for soft costs. 2 The PFE Estimate of Cost is not based on a specific project cost estimate, but on a unit cost per mile of trail as described in the PFE Nexus Study.
Total:
186
Exhibit B
EXHIBIT B
IDENTIFICATION OF PFE FEE CREDITS
JOINER RANCH EAST PROJECT WITHIN
THE JOINER RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AREA
JEN California 24, LLC
Transportation and Parks/Trails PFE Facilities
Date of Agreement: __________, 2026
PFE
Item
PFE Facility
Description
PFE Estimate
of Cost1
Final PFE
Credit Value2
Transportation Improvements
R-70 Intersection of Joiner Parkway and Nicolaus Road $206,049 $183,600 Subtotals: $206,049 $183,600
Parks and Trails Improvements
N/A³ Trail/Open Space Improvements $117,905 $58,451
Subtotals: $117,905 $58,451
$323,954 $242,051
Transportation PFE Fee Credits: $183,600
Parks and Trails PFE Fee Credits: $58,451
Total PFE Credit Values: $242,051
1 Based on the amounts estimated in the PFE Nexus Study for each PFE Item, prorated by the percentage of the PFE Facility constructed or caused to be constructed by the Constructing Owner. The PFE Estimate of Cost includes 50% of construction costs for soft costs.
2 The Initial PFE Credit Value is calculated as the lesser of the PFE Estimate of Cost and the best available actual cost data as of the Effective Date of this Agreement. Amounts have been confirmed following City acceptance of the PFE Facilities for the Project, pursuant to Section 10 of this Agreement.
3 The PFE Estimate of Cost is not based on a specific project cost estimate, but on a unit cost per mile of trail as described in the PFE Nexus Study.
Totals:
187
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF ASSIGNMENT AND
TRANSFER OF PFE FEE CREDITS
Joiner Ranch East, Joiner Ranch General Development Plan Area, Transfer Letter #___
Certification and Assignment
of Fee Credits
The undersigned Constructing Owner, as the holder of certain PFE Fee Credits related to the PFE Fee Credit Agreement between the Constructing Owner and the City of Lincoln, dated ________ ___, 2026 (the “Agreement”), hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys to the undersigned Assignee the PFE Fee Credits as indicated in the table below. Assignee acknowledges that the following PFE Fee Credits do not represent all fees payable by Assignee, which may change based upon the size of Assignee’s project and other factors. Constructing Owner and the City wish to certify the availability of the PFE Fee Credits and hereby consent to the assignment of the below PFE Fee Credits to Assignee.
1. The City hereby acknowledges and certifies that Constructing Owner is the current holder of the following PFE Fee Credits pursuant to the Agreement.
2. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Constructing Owner does hereby assign and transfer to Assignee; and Assignee does hereby accept from Constructing Owner the assignment and transfer of the PFE Fee Credits as shown in the table below. By signing below the City does hereby consent and agree to the above assignment.
Prior to receiving credit against otherwise due and payable PFE Fees, excluding the payment of the Critical Component and Administration Fees, Assignee should submit this fully executed form to the City for its records.
PFE Fee
Category
PFE Fee
Credit Value
Transportation $
Parks and Trails $
(Signatures are on the following page.)
188
Exhibit C
Joiner Ranch East, Joiner Ranch General Development Plan Area, Transfer Letter #__
Certification and Assignment
of Fee Credits
Constructing Owner: Assignee:
JEN California 24, LLC, _______________________________,
a California limited liability company a ______________________________
By:_______________________________ By:_____________________________
Name:_____________________________ Name: __________________________
Title:______________________________ Title:____________________________
City of Lincoln:
By: ______________________________ Date: __________________
__________________, City Manager
Approved as to form
____________________________
________________, City Attorney
189
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION 2026-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT WITH JEN CALIFORNIA 24, LLC FOR
TRANSPORTATION AND PARKS/TRAILS PFE FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE
JOINER RANCH EAST PROJECT
WHEREAS, JEN California 24, LLC (the “Developer”) is developing the Joine r Ranch East project (the “Project”) that includes Public Facilities Element (“PFE”) Facilities that will serve the Project and other areas of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is required as a condition of development of the Project to construct, or cause to be constructed, certain transportation and parks/trails PFE facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Project will be required to pay PFE fees as a part of the building permit process; and
WHEREAS, the Developer will receive PFE fee credits for construction of PFE facilities that may offset the Project’s PFE fee obligation that would otherwise be collected upon issuance of building permits; and
WHEREAS, the initial PFE credit value awarded to the Developer for the construction of the transportation and parks/trails PFE facilities is $242,051; and
WHEREAS, a final “true-up” of all actual costs associated with construction of the transportation and parks/trails PFE facilities will be performed foll owing City acceptance of the PFE facilities to determine the final PFE credit value.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes the City Manager to execute a Public Facilities Element Fee Credit Agreement with JEN California 24, LLC for Transportation and Parks/Trails Facilities associated with the Joiner Ranch East Project subject to concurrent review by City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
190
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
191
SUBJECT:
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing Applications for Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Programs (Jacob Groeser)
SUBMITTED BY:
Jacob Groeser
DEPARTMENT:
Engineering
DATE:
April 28, 2026
Item Number 13.I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution:
1 .
Authorizing applications for grant funding from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Programs;
2 .
Authorizing the City Manager to submit the City of Lincoln’s 2026 Federal Funding Program priorities;
3 .
Authorizing the City Manager to execute all grant documents and timely project delivery requirements.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) plays a central role in funding transportation improvements throughout the region by administering Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds across three programs. Each program supports different types of projects, and collectively aim to improve air quality, enhance mobility, and keep our transportation system in good working condition.
The System Performance Program funds projects that improve how the transportation system functions day-to-day, including roadway and safety improvements, transit upgrades, EV charging, new bike and pedestrian connections, mobility hubs, and smart-transportation technologies that help manage traffic and improve reliability.
The Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program supports projects that reduce emissions and improve air quality—such as high-capacity transit, zero-emission vehicles and charging infrastructure, bikeways and trails, Complete Streets, traffic flow improvements, and programs that encourage carpooling, transit use, and other clean transportation options.
The City of Lincoln has identified two priority projects which meet the criteria for the CMAQ and STBG programs.
STAFF REPORT
192
1 .
– Virginiatown Road Rehabilitation
2. – 3
rd
Street Grade Crossing
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
If awarded, the grant would fund construction of two separate projects intended to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, and increase the performance of existing roadway infrastructure.
The first project consists of roadway performance improvement along East 12th Street/Virginiatown Road, extending from East Avenue to Hungry Hollow Road. The project would improve the performance of the roadway through localized base repairs followed by application of a surface treatment, such as a rubberized asphalt cape seal. In conjunction with the pavement improvements, roadway striping would be reevaluated to improve comfort and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Proposed striping modifications include narrowed travel lanes and the addition of wide buffered bicycle lanes to provide greater separation between vehicle and bicycle traffic. Curb ramps within the project limits would also be upgraded to meet current accessibility standards. Virginiatown Road serves as a critical corridor for agriculture and agritourism, residential access, recreational cycling, and emergency evacuation during large-scale fire events. An overview exhibit is provided in Attachment B.
The second project is proposed for funding under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program, and focuses on improving pedestrian and bicycle accessibility in downtown Lincoln. Over the past decade, the City has completed multiple improvements along the Lincoln Boulevard corridor, including several pedestrian crossings at the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. The proposed 3rd Street Grade Crossing Project would continue these efforts between H Street and F Street.
If awarded, the project would construct an accessible pedestrian crossing at the 3rd Street railroad crossing, together with associated curb ramps and sidewalk improvements providing access to the crossing. The project also includes roadway preservation through application of a cape seal and implementation of a revised striping configuration. The proposed lane configuration would add buffered bicycle lanes while maintaining shoulder parking.
3rd Street is an important corridor for non-motorized travel within the downtown area. The project area serves several key destinations, including Glen Edwards Middle School, Lincoln High School, a Placer County Transit stop, and the downtown commercial district. See attachment C for a project overview.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The proposed action will not lead to any construction and is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The 3
rd
Street Grade Crossing and the 12
th
/ Virginiatown Road projects will be funded in
combination by local funds through the CIP program and two separate grant applications. If awarded, new CIP’s will be created and funded for preliminary expenses as needed. A 193
minimum local match of 11.47% is required. A summary of the funding is listed below.
East 12
th
/ Virginiatown Road Rehabilitation
Funding Source
Amount
Local Funding – (Fund 2210) (12%
Match)
$155,000
STBG Grant
$1,300,000
PROJECT TOTAL
$1,455,000
3 rd
Street Grade Crossing
Funding Source
Amount
Local Funding – (Fund 2210) (13%
Match)
$191,000
STBG Grant
$1,458,000
PROJECT TOTAL
$1,649,000
ATTACHMENTS:
2.Grant_Application_-_CMAQ___STBG.DOC2.Attachment_A_Reso.2026April28.jgroeser (1).doc
3.Grant Application - CMAQ & STBG.DOC3.Attachment B.2026April28.jgroeser.pdf
4.Grant Application - CMAQ & STBG.DOC4.Attachment C.2026April28.jgroeser.pdf 194
RESOLUTION 2026 - XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN AUTHORIZING (1) APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDING FROM THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SACOG) 2026
FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS; (2) THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S SACOG 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAM
APPLICATION PRIORITIES ; (3) THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT DOCUMENTS AND TIMELY PROJECT DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS.
WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has announced three 2026 Federal Funding Cycle Programs (Funding Programs), which are open to sponsoring agencies within the six -county SACOG region:
System Preservation Program, System Performance Program, and Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program; and
WHEREAS, the System Perfor mance Program funds projects that improve how the transportation system functions day -to-day, including roadway and safety improvements, transit upgrades, EV charging, new bike and pedestrian connections, mobility hubs, and smart-transportation technologies that help manage traffic and improve reliability; and
WHEREAS, the Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program supports projects that reduce emissions and improve air quality —such as high -capacity transit, zero -emission vehic les and charging infrastruc ture, bikeways and trails, Complete Streets, traffic flow improvements, and programs that encourage carpooling, transit use, and other clean transportation options; and WHEREAS, eligible projects for Funding Programs must be listed in the 2025 Blueprint or fit within 2025 Blueprint lump -sum project categories including but not limited to road maintenance and reconstruction, transit vehicle replacements, operational improvements, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and bicycle and pedestrian investments; and
WHEREAS, SACOG limits Funding Programs grant applications to no more than three applications per sponsoring agency for any one of the three different Funding Programs to SACOG, up to a maximum of nine total applications per sponsoring agency; and
WHEREAS, applicants shall affirm their commitment to delivering projects in accordance with the requirements of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program, as applicable; and
195
WHEREAS, grant proposals for construction work shall obligate Funding Program dollars for construction activities no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-29.
WHEREAS, SACOG will not provide additional federal or state funding in the event that cost overruns are identified; and
WHEREAS, project sponsors shall commit to providing local matching dollars, typically 11.47% of the total project cost; and WHEREAS, SACOG requires that if awarded federal funds by the SACOG Board, City of Lincoln staff responsible for project delivery must attend quarterly project delivery meetings with SACOG staff to receive assistance until project closeout.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
SECTION 1 . The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to commi tting the City of Lincoln to federal, state and regional funding and project delivery requirements, including but not limited to abiding by Funding Program guidelines.
SECTION 2 . The City Council acknowledges that in the event of receiving an award by the SACOG Board of Funding Program dollars, that City of Lincoln will be required to abide by multiple timely use of funding requirements described in Funding Program guidelines and SACOG’s Regional Delivery Policies, including but not limited to, obligating federal funding no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-2029 for construction activities, committing to securing required local match dollars, acknowledge that SACOG does not cover cost overruns, and commits staff to attend delivery meetings until project closeout.
SECTION 3 . The City Manager or designee is directed to submit the following applications for 2026 Six-County Federal Funding Cycle Programs.
1. East 12th Street / Virginiatown Road Rehabilitation
2. 3rd Street Grade Crossing
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
196
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
197
F:\ENGINEERING\CIP\CIP-XXX PCTPA - Virginiatown Road\9. Engineering and Design\Exhibits\East 12th - PCTPA.dwg NEAST 12TH / VIRGINIATOWN ROAD REHABPROJECT AREA1 OF 2
NO SCALE
OLD HWY 65 / LINCOLN BLVDCARLIN C. COPPINELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CITY DESIGNATEDTRUCK ROUTE WITHINPROJECT
VIRGINIATOWN ROADCITY LIMITS
HIGHWAY 193 / MCBEAN PARK DRIVE
PROJECT LIMITSSEE SHEET 2 FORSCOPE OF WORK
OLD HWY 65 / LINCOLN BLVD
EAST AVENUEMCBEAN PARK DRIVE
HUNGRY HOLLOW RD
SR 65
WHISKEY RUN RANCHMENSCH CITRUS
NASTASE HONEY FARM
LOCAL FARM OR FARM TO MARKET BUSINESS
LILLARDS LAVENDERS
MATSUDA LANDSCAPE &BONSAI NURSERY
FOWLER RANCH FARM /FARMERS' MARKETTERNERO FARMS
SERENDIPITY RANCH
LINCOLN HILLSFARMERS' MARKET
GOATHOUSE BREWING CO.
DORA DAIN WINERY &PUMPKIN PATCH
PROJECT AREA INFORMATION1.12 FARMS OR OTHER FARM TO MARKET BUSINESSES WITHIN 2 MILES OF PROJECT.2.AVERAGE PCI OF ROADWAY IS 28.3.THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO BIKE LANES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA, DESPITE BEING APOPULAR BIKE ROUTE FOR MANY RIDERS. 10,500 FEET OF PROPOSED BUFFERED BIKELANES SHOWN ON SHEET 2.4.AVERAGE DAILY VEHICLE TRAFFIC IS APPROXIMATELY 2,300 VEHICLES (EAST ANDWESTBOUND COMBINED)5.VIRGINIATOWN ROAD IS IDENTIFIED AS A MAJOR EVACUATION ROUTE IN THE EVENT OF ALARGE-SCALE FIRE.
HILLENBRANDFARMHOUS BREWERY PLACER COUNTYTRANSIT STOP
ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGEDAREA PER CALIFORNIAENERGY COMMISION
GLEN EDWARDSMIDDLE SCHOOL
LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL
198
F:\ENGINEERING\CIP\CIP-XXX PCTPA - Virginiatown Road\9. Engineering and Design\Exhibits\East 12th - PCTPA.dwg NEAST 12TH / VIRGINIATOWN ROAD REHABSCOPE OF WORK2 OF 2
TYPICAL SECTIONNO SCALE
VARIES (E) ROAD SECTION(E) EDGE OFPAVEMENT
EAST 12TH / VIRGINIATOWN ROAD
NO SCALE
DIGOUTS / BASE REPAIRS WHERE NEEDED
CAPE SEAL WITH TYPE II MICRO SURFACING
EAST AVENUE
HUNGRY HOLLOW ROAD
BEGIN PROJECTEND PROJECT
UPGRADE ADA RAMPS THROUGHOUT PROJECT (18 TOTAL)
NEW STRIPING SECTION - TYPICALNO SCALE
11' TRAVELLANE6' BIKELANE3' BUFFERCL11' TRAVELLANE6' BIKELANE3' BUFFER40' EAST 11TH STREET
EAST 10TH STREET
MCCOURTNEY ROAD
199
F:\ENGINEERING\CIP\CIP-XXX PCTPA - Virginiatown Road\9. Engineering and Design\Exhibits\3rd Street - PCTPA.dwg N3RD STREET GRADE CROSSINGPROJECT AREA1 OF 2
NO SCALE
OLD HWY 65 / LINCOLN BLVDCARLIN C. COPPINELEMENTARY SCHOOL
VIRGINIATOWN ROAD
CITY LIMITS HIGHWAY 193 / MCBEAN PARK DRIVEPROJECT LIMITSSEE SHEET 2 FORSCOPE OF WORKEAST AVENUEMCBEAN PARK DRIVE
HUNGRY HOLLOW RD
SR 65
GLEN EDWARDSMIDDLE SCHOOL3RD STREET
PROJECT AREA INFORMATION1.12 FARMS OR OTHER FARM TO MARKET BUSINESSES WITHIN 2 MILES OF PROJECT.2.AVERAGE PCI OF ROADWAY IS 44.3.THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO BUFFERED BIKE LANES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. THEEXISTING BIKE LANES ARE EITHER NON-EXISTENT OR ARE FADED AND IN NEED OFRESTRIPING. 1,200 FEET OF PROPOSED BUFFERED BIKE LANES SHOWN ON SHEET 2.4.AVERAGE DAILY VEHICLE TRAFFIC IS APPROXIMATELY 4,700 VEHICLES (EAST ANDWESTBOUND COMBINED)5.3RD STREET IS A DIRECT CONNECTION TO GLEN EDWARDS MIDDLE SCHOOL. THISPROJECT PROPOSES A PEDESTRIAN GRADE CROSSING OVER THE EXISTING UNIONPACIFIC RAILROAD, INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE AND RAILROAD SIGNALUPGRADES.6.4 RECORDED VEHICLE + BIKE / PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS RECORDED SINCE 2015.
WHISKEY RUN RANCHMENSCH CITRUS
NASTASE HONEY FARM
LOCAL FARM OR FARM TO MARKET BUSINESS
LILLARDS LAVENDERS
MATSUDA LANDSCAPE &BONSAI NURSERY
FOWLER RANCH FARM /FARMERS' MARKETTERNERO FARMS
SERENDIPITY RANCH
LINCOLN HILLSFARMERS' MARKET
GOATHOUSE BREWING CO.
DORA DAIN WINERY &PUMPKIN PATCH
HILLENBRANDFARMHOUS BREWERY
CITY DESIGNATEDTRUCK ROUTE
PLACER COUNTYTRANSIT STOP
LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL
OLD HWY 65 / LINCOLN BLVD
ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGEDAREA PER CALIFORNIAENERGY COMMISION 200
F:\ENGINEERING\CIP\CIP-XXX PCTPA - Virginiatown Road\9. Engineering and Design\Exhibits\3rd Street - PCTPA.dwg N
3RD STREET
3RD STREET GRADE CROSSINGSCOPE OF WORK2 OF 2
TYPICAL SECTIONNO SCALE
VARIES (E) ROAD SECTION(E) EDGE OFPAVEMENT
NO SCALE
DIGOUTS / BASE REPAIRS WHERE NEEDED
CAPE SEAL WITH TYPE II MICRO SURFACING
END PROJECT
NEW STRIPING SECTION - TYPICALNO SCALE
12' TRAVELLANE5' BIKELANE2' BUFFERCL56'
UPRR CONCRETEPANEL EXTENSION
UPRR CONCRETEPANEL EXTENSION
TIE INTOPREVIOUS CIPROADWORK
PEDESTRIANGRADE CROSSING
PEDESTRIANGRADE CROSSINGCURB RAMP
CAPE SEALWITHIN LIMITS
H STREET
UPRR
LINCOLN BLVD
F STREET
9' PARKING /SHOULDER12' TRAVELLANE5' BIKELANE2' BUFFER9' PARKING /SHOULDER
SIDEWALK,CURB ANDGUTTER
201
SUBJECT:
Stardust 12 Project (Mikaela Noble)
SUBMITTED BY:
Mikaela Noble
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
DATE:
April 28, 2026
Item Number 14.A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, consider the information contained in the staff report as well as the testimony of the public and the Planning Commission’s recommendation of approval, and take the following actions:
1 .
Adopt a Resolution to adopt the proposed addendum to the certified 2012 Village 1 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse (SCH) # 2010102018), certifying that the proposed Project will not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new impacts, new mitigation measures, new or revised alternatives, or an increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts that would require major revisions to the EIR, and therefore, pursuant California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162, the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required. 2 .
Adopt a Resolution amending the Village 1 Specific Plan to reflect changes to land use designations and zoning of the Stardust 12 Project site. 3 .
Consider waiving first reading and introduce by title only an Ordinance amending the Village 1 General Development Plan to reflect changes to land use designations and zoning of the Stardust 12 Project site.
4 .
Adopt a Resolution approving a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the proposed Stardust 12 Project.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
The Stardust 12 Project (project) is located within the Village 1 Specific Plan (see Attachments 1 and 2). The
Village 1 Specific Plan
(Specific Plan) provides direction for development of
1,832 acres of land within the City of Lincoln (City). The Specific Plan identifies land use designations and zoning for the plan area, the circulation system, utilities systems, parks and open space, and other planning considerations. In addition, the Specific Plan includes a wide range of goals and policies, design guidelines and development standards that will guide development within Village 1.
The following is a brief timeline for the Village 1 Specific Plan and associated documents:
November 27, 2012: City certifies EIR (SCH No. 2010102018), adopts Mitigation Monitoring Plan, approves Specific Plan.
STAFF REPORT
202
July 9, 2013: Council adopts revisions to Specific Plan and EIR addendum to address changes to Oak Tree Lane connection to Sierra College Boulevard, as well as the provision of an additional school site.
2015: 1,712 acres of the Village 1 Specific Plan were annexed into the City.
Approximately 120 acres of the adopted Specific Plan were not included in that annexation due to opposition of the property owners.
March 2020: Specific Plan was revised, and rezoning adopted for area known as Turkey Creek Estates (248 acres on east side, north of McBean Park Drive). Amendments reduce amount of Village Country Estates (VCE) land in north part of Turkey Creek Estates project and increase Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) acreage. This results in reduction of 128 VCE units and increase of 128 VLDR units. Parks acreage also slightly reduced with an increase in open space. Specific Plan’s total amount of developable acreage unchanged.
September 2023: Council approves amendment to realign Oak Tree Lane and make minor modifications to land use plan. Total number of residential units reduced to 5,610 from 5,639.
Since 2023, Council has approved several small lot tentative maps for several Village 1 projects, most recently the Parkwood Project which is located south and west of the Stardust 12 Project site.
Planning Commission Actions
The City of Lincoln Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed project on Wednesday, March 18, 2026. No comments were received from the public, either in writing, in person, or online.
One commissioner voted against the project, which he felt was not consistent with the General Plan. In particular, he cited General Plan Policy LU-12.6, which encourages new development to be oriented towards adjacent creeks and wetlands areas, and to provide visual access to those areas. It was noted that there are no creeks or wetland areas on the Stardust 12 site. The commissioner also stated that he believed that the Village 1 Specific Plan itself was not consistent with this General Plan policy.
A concern was raised that the existing slopes within the project site are 10 percent in some places, which is fairly steep, and that massive grading might be required. The project engineer explained that the finished grade would be 0.5 to 3 percent, which is typical for single family residential development.
With respect to the project drainage basins, there was concern that they would redirect natural flows. The project engineer explained that drainage system generally follows the existing drainage pattern, and that the basins would be located in areas where there are depressions currently. The swale along State Route 193 will be part of the City’s public drainage system.
A concern was raised regarding a lack of housing diversity in the projects that have been approved to date within Village 1. Staff clarified that the Waterfront project was approved for 271 apartment units, and that there are additional high density and mixed use zones within Village 1.
In response to commissioner questions, staff clarified that a sound wall would be provided along the northern boundary of the project site. Ultimately, the Planning Commission recommended, by a 6-1 vote, that the City Council approve the requested entitlements. 203
Project Location and Description
The project site is located on approximately 12.8 acres in the City of Lincoln south of McBean Park Drive and west of Stardust Lane within the Village 1 Specific Plan (see Attachments 1 and 2). The Assessor’s Parcel Numbers are 021-274-038-000 and 021-274-039-000. The project site is bounded by McBean Park Drive to the north, Stardust Lane to the east, the recently-approved Stardust subdivision to the south, and a vacant Village 1 parcel to west that is zoned VLDR.
Primary access to the project site would be provided by a connection to Leavell Ranch Road (formerly call the Oak Tree Lane extension). An emergency vehicle access (EVA) would connect to Stardust Lane.
The project site is undeveloped. The project site existing slopes range from 5% to 10%. The project site consists primarily of oak woodland, with a grassland understory and some scattered rock outcroppings.
Land Use Designations and Zoning
The project would develop Village 1 Planning Areas (PA) 20, 21-B and 90-B. The project site is currently zoned Village Low Density Residential (VLDR, 5.3 acres), Village Country Estates (VCE, 5.7 acres) and Village Open Space (VOS, 1.8 acres). The proposed project would rezone the VLDR and VCE areas to Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR). The VOS zoning would be unchanged. Table 1 and Attachment 3 compare the existing and proposed land use/zoning designations for the project site.
Project Components
The applicant has submitted a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the creation of the specific lots within the project site (Attachment 8, Exhibit B). The map would create 84 residential lots, two open space/water quality treatment lots, a utility corridor and an EVA.
A total of 84 VMDR units are proposed for 10.4 acres, resulting in a density of approximately
8.1 units per acre. The current zoning allows for a maximum of 2.9 units per acre for VCE and
5.9 units per acre VLDR. Because the proposed project density is greater than allowed under the current land use designation and zoning, the applicant is requesting that the entire project site – with the exception of the 1.8 acres of VOS – be redesignated and rezoned as VMDR. As such, the applicant has submitted an application to amend the Village 1 Specific Plan and General Development Plan to redesignate and rezone portions of the project site from VCE and VLDR to VMDR. Table 1 and Attachment 3 compare the existing and proposed land use designation/zoning for the project site.
Under the current zoning, the total number of units that could be developed on the project site is 48. The project proposed to construct 84 units, an increase in 36 units. The applicant also developed the recently-approved Parkwood project, which was approved for 42 fewer units than the zoning allowed and assumed in the Specific Plan and EIR. The applicant is proposing to apply 36 of the 42 units from the Parkwood project to the proposed Stardust 12 project.
Consequently, there would not be a change in the total number of units allowed within the Village 1 plan area.
The layout of the proposed project is shown in Attachment 4. Residential lot sizes would range from 3,200 to 8,864 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,029 square feet. With one 204
exception, the largest lots would be located along the eastern boundary of the project site.
Lots would range from 30 to 65 feet in width (most lots would be 40 feet wide) and 80 to 125 feet in depth. The 84 single-family residences would be single or two story.
Table 1:
Land Use Comparison
Land Use/Zone
Adopted
Specific Plan
Acreage
Proposed
Acreage
Difference
Village Country Estates
(VCE)
5.7 0.0
-5.7
Village Low Density
Residential (VLDR)
5.3 0.0
-5.3
Village Medium Density
Residential (VMDR)
0.0 11.0
+11.0
Village Open Space
(VOS)
1.8 1.8
0 Total
12.8 12.8
0 Circulation
Access to the project site would be provided by a connection to Leavell Ranch Road, which connects north to McBean Park Drive. If the proposed project is constructed prior to completion of the portion of Leavell Ranch Road required to obtain access to the project site, the project would be responsible for constructing that portion to McBean Park Drive. This section of Leavell Ranch Road is planned to have single travel lanes in each direction, with bike/NEV lanes and separated sidewalks on each side.
The proposed project would also construct improvements along McBean Park Drive to conform with the ultimate layout of the southern half of the road along the project boundary.
This portion of McBean Park Drive is planned to have a 14-foot median, two travel lanes, a bike lane/shoulder, drainage ditch and multiuse trail.
An EVA would connect to Stardust Lane, adjacent to the eastern project boundary, for emergency personnel use only. It would be gated with an override for emergency vehicles to access the site, or knock-down bollards would be installed.
Utilities
New onsite and offsite infrastructure are proposed to be constructed as part of the project consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan. Water, sewer and drainage services will be provided by the City of Lincoln. Under the Village 1 Specific Plan, major water, sewer and dry utility lines will be placed within the Leavell Ranch Road right-of-way, connecting to lines in McBean Park Drive. The proposed project would connect to water lines in Leavell Ranch Road via the project access road. A sewer line would connect directly to McBean Park Drive through a utility corridor (see Attachment 4). The City’s sewer and water systems are capable of accommodating the proposed project.
A water quality basin would be constructed within the southwestern corner of the project site (Lot B) to collect and treat project stormwater runoff. A bioretention basin would also be constructed in the western half of the VOS parcel.
205
Offsite Improvements
The proposed project includes two offsite components. First, the two-lane connection to Leavell Ranch Road would be constructed offsite, immediately west of the project site (see Attachment 8, Exhibit B). Second, the proposed project would construct frontage improvements along McBean Park Drive to conform to the ultimate design of this roadway segment (see Attachment 8, Exhibit B), including an additional vehicle lane, bike lane, drainage ditch and separated, multiuse trail.
Development Agreement
The Village 1 Specific Plan requires adoption of a
Development Agreement
, which delineates
the obligation of the project proponent and the City with respect to the project. Typically, the Development Agreement vests the right of the developer to develop the project as approved and sets out obligations of both the City and the developer. The provisions of the Development Agreement run with the property, so they continue to be in force even if property ownership is transferred. The term of the Development Agreement is 20 years after the effective date. The Final Development Agreement must be adopted by Ordinance by the City Council. The Stardust 12 Project Development Agreement is undergoing a separate negotiation process between the applicant and City staff, and will be considered separate from this application at a later date.
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
General Plan
The 2050 City of Lincoln General Plan serves as the guiding land use document for the City of Lincoln. The proposed Stardust 12 Project application is consistent with the applicable policies of the 2050 General Plan as follows:
A
.
The proposed Stardust 12 Project will increase the housing stock and diversity in the City by developing 84 medium-density residential units at an overall density of 8.1 units per acre (Housing Element Policy 2 and Policy LU-1.7).
B
.
The proposed Stardust 12 Project, as conditioned, includes the provision of 1.8 acres of open space, and will pay fees to provide parks and recreation opportunities for the enjoyment and well-being of local residents (Land Use Element Policies LU-1.11, LU-
12.7, LU-15.17 and LU-15.18).
C
.
Future residents would have the option of walking and bicycling by connecting to Leavell Ranch Road which will connect to the City’s existing trail network along McBean Park Drive. Therefore, the proposed Stardust 12 Project is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.6, Goal T-5 and related policies that address bicycle and trail circulation (Transportation Element Policies T-5.6, T-5.7, T-5.9, and OSC-7.20).
D
.
The proposed Stardust 12 Project preserves and protects existing biological resources including both wildlife and vegetative habitat (Open Space Element Policies OSC-1 and OSC-5 and LU-1.11) by preserving 1.8 acres, approximately 14 percent, of the project site as open space. In addition, the project shall comply with Chapter 18.69 of the City’s Zoning Code and the City of Lincoln Guidelines for Development around Oak Trees, as well as mitigation measures contained in the Village 1 EIR (Policy OSC-5.1).
E
.
The plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and mitigation measures provided in the EIR to minimize drainage concentrations and impervious coverage (Policy PFS-
4.2).
F
.
An archaeological study has been conducted within the project site consistent with the EIR mitigation measures and Policies OSC 6.3, 6.7, and 6.8.
G
.
The project will mitigate potential land use conflicts by providing larger parcels and building setbacks for lots adjacent to the rural residential uses in the County, consistent 206
with Policy LU-1.14.
Village 1 Specific Plan
The Village 1 Specific Plan is intended to direct the location and nature of development within the Specific Plan area, including the Stardust 12 Project site. The proposed Stardust 12 Project is consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan as follows:
Policies
The proposed Stardust 12 Project is consistent with the requirements of the Village 1 Specific Plan, including:
A
.
The Stardust 12 Project would develop residential uses in a VMDR zone, consistent with Chapter 3, Land Use Plan.
B
.
The Stardust 12 Project would provide frontage improvements to McBean Park Drive as specified in Chapter 4, Circulation Plan, of the Village 1 Specific Plan including a bike lane and multiuse trail.
C
.
The Stardust 12 Project would connect to water, sewer and dry utilities systems and provide drainage facilities as required by Chapter 5, Infrastructure and Public Facilities plan.
D
.
The Stardust 12 Project would provide open space acreage and pay fees toward development of parks consistent Chapter 5 and Chapter 6, Resource Management Plan.
E
.
The project site supports special-status species habitat, but surveys did not identify any significant cultural resources. Consistent with Chapter 6, Resource Management Plan, the proposed Stardust 12 Project would mitigate potential impacts on special-status species.
Land Use Designation Changes
The project proposes to amend the Village 1 Specific Plan as shown in Table 1, with 5.3 acres currently designated VCE and 5.7 acres currently designated VLDR being re-designated and rezoned as 11 acres of VMDR. Under the current zoning, a total of 48 units could be constructed on the project site. The proposed Stardust 12 Project provides for 84 units, an increase of 36 units. However, the total number of units allowed within the Village 1 plan area would not be increased due to unit reductions for the previously-approved Parkwood Project, which is being developed by the same applicant. The Parkwood Project with the Village 1 Specific Plan area developed at a lower density than assumed in the Specific Plan and EIR, resulting in 42 fewer units being approved for the Parkwood site than the anticipated unit allowance. The applicant is proposing to apply 36 of the 42 units from the Parkwood project to the proposed Stardust 12 project. Consequently, there would not be a change in the total number of units allowed within the Village 1 plan area.
Parks and Open Space
New development within Lincoln is required to provide both preserved open space and traditional parks. The Village 1 Specific Plan includes a total of 741 acres of open space and parks (including a golf course). In reviewing the appropriate amount of parkland within a development project located in Village 1, the City considers the amount of parkland anticipated in the Village 1 Specific Plan, the General Plan park standards, and the unique characteristics of the individual project.
The City of Lincoln General Plan establishes a standard of 3 acres of Neighborhood Park, 3 acres of open space and 3 acres of citywide parks per 1,000 residents within any project that is approved subject to a Development Agreement, which is required for this project. The Village 1 Specific Plan and
Infrastructure Financing Plan
adjusted the requirement for
207
neighborhood parks to be 2.43 acres per 1,000 residents due to the large amount of open space provided within Village 1.
The Village 1 Specific Plan establishes the household population (number of persons expected per household) for various residential densities. The assumed household population of medium density residential development is 2.8 persons per household. Given the project proposes to construct a maximum of 84 homes, it is assumed that the Stardust 12 project will have approximately 235 residents at build out. Therefore, the Stardust 12 project would be required to provide for acres 0.70 of open space, 0.70 acres of regional park and 0.57 acres of neighborhood park.
The project’s obligation for 0.70 acres of open space would be fully met through the preservation of approximately 1.8 acres of open space on site. The proposed project does not provide any neighborhood or community parks or related facilities, and the Specific Plan does not identify any of these facilities within the project site. Therefore, the project’s obligation for neighborhood and community parks would be met through the payment of park fees. As required by Mitigation Measure 4.12-7, these fees would off-set the cost of constructing the neighborhood and community parks planned within the Village 1 plan area, which could include developing the remainder of the lake front in the western portion of the Specific Plan area, other recreational amenities, or other park sites.
Departmental Review and Conditions of Approval
The project has been reviewed by various affected city departments, including the Engineering Division, Police Department and Fire Department. Based on this review, conditions of approval (COA) are being recommended for the project including requirements for submittal of required studies and plans, including a water study, storm water quality maintenance and operation plan, sanitary sewer report, soils report, erosion control program, a storm water quality plan, a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), landscaping plan, street lighting plan, utility line sizing study, and Wildland Fire Management Program. Requirements are provided for the design of ADA-compliant ramps from sidewalks to streets, timing of roadway improvements, street lighting, landscaping, blasting, construction, building and occupancy permits. The COA also include the requirement of compliance to the applicable mitigation measures from the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program for the certified EIR.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In accordance with Government Code Section 65457(a) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), any residential project meeting the development density or undertaken pursuant to and in conformity with a specific plan (e.g., Village 1 Specific Plan) adopted pursuant to Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8 of the Government Code is exempt from further environmental review. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(b)(2) states that if a project falls within the scope of the project described in a Program EIR, and no subsequent environmental review would be required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, then no new environmental document is required. As discussed in more detail in the Addendum prepared for the project (see Attachment 5, Exhibit A), the proposed Stardust 12 Project is in conformance with the previously certified Final EIR (SCH #2010102018) prepared for the Village 1 Specific Plan. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. Applicable mitigation measures from the certified EIR shall be applied and are attached as part of Attachment 5, Exhibit B (Mitigation Monitoring Program).
208
Tribal Consultation
As required by Village 1 EIR Mitigation Measure 4.5-2, the City contacted the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC) to inquire whether they would like to consult with the City regarding the protection of traditional tribal and cultural places that might be present in the area. The UAIC did request consultation, and was provided with information regarding the conceptual project layout and known archaeological resources. Representatives of the UAIC and the applicant, along with City staff, conducted one site visit during consultation. Negotiation with the tribe resulted in agreement with respect to onsite monitoring and construction activities, and consultation was closed on March 3, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs associated with the application are assumed by the project applicant and recovered by the City. If the Project is adopted, the Village 1 Specific Plan IFP will be amended to reflect the costs of infrastructure associated with the Project as approved.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 Project Location
Attachment 2 Village 1 Land Use Plan
Attachment 3 Land Use Comparison
Attachment 4 Project Layout
Attachment 5 Stardust 12 Addendum Resolution.docx
Attachment 5 Stardust 12 Addendum Reso Exhibits.pdf
Attachment 6 Stardust 12 SPA Resolution.docx
Attachment 6 Stardust 12 SPA Reso Exhibits.pdf
White_Brenner_Review_Attachment 7 Stardust 12 GDPA Ordinance.doc Attachment 7 Stardust 12 GDPA Ordinance Exhibits.pdf
White Brenner Review Attachment 8 Stardust 12 SLTSM Resolution.docx Attachment 8 Stardust 12 SLTSM Reso Exhibits.pdf
209
SIERRA COLLEGE BLVD
STARDUST LANE
STAGECOACH LANE
HEATHER
193 MCBEAN PARK DRIVE
PROJECT
SITE
DRIVE
LOCATION MAP
nts
Attachment 1: Project Location
210
BICKFORD RANCH
FERRARI
RANCH
ROAD
SUN CITY LINCOLN HILLS
(DEL WEBB)
SUN CITY LINCOLN HILLS
(DEL WEBB)
CITY OF LINCOLN
McBEAN PARK DR.
VILLAGE 40
Virginiatown Road
State Highway 193
Stardust Lane
Sierra
College
Blvd.
Oak Tree Lane
Ferrari
Ranch
Road
PA 1
VLDR
79.6 ac.
PA 59
VPR
1.0 ac.
PA 58
VPR
1.0 ac.
PA 61
VPR
6.7 ac. PA 8
VMDR
28.0 ac.
PA 7
VLDR
135.2 ac.
PA 39
VOS
83.3 ac.
PA 42
VOS
24.8 ac.
PA 9
VMDR
9.6 ac.
PA 3
VOS
6.3 ac.
PA 2
VLDR
9.5 ac.
PA 4
VCE
11.0 ac.
PA 5
VCE
18.5 ac.PA 6
VCE
22.4 ac. PA 41
VOS
41.2 ac.
PA 80
VPR
222.6 ac.
PA 74
VPR
5.6 ac.
PA 54
VOS
21.7 ac.
PA 33
VLDR
9.5 ac.
PA 32a
VLDR
12.3 ac.
PA 34a
VLDR
39.3 ac.
PA 34b
VLDR
105.1 ac.
PA 32b
VLDR
49.2 ac.
PA 27
VMDR
40.5 ac.
PA 66
VPR
33.7 ac.
PA 15
VMU
10.1 ac.
PA 65VPR
22.1 ac.
PA 14
VMU
19.9 ac.
PA 46
VOS
3.6 ac.
PA 26
VHDR9.8 ac.
PA 17
VMU
9.0 ac.
PA 47
VOS
3.0 ac.
PA 48
VOS
5.0 ac.
PA 13b
VCE
9.9 ac.
PA 10
VLDR
43.2 ac.
PA 44
VOS
12.4 ac.
PA 11
VLDR
76.5 ac.
PA 43
VOS
10.7 ac.
PA 18
VMDR
9.9 ac.
PA 24
VLDR
31.4 ac.
PA 53
VOS
4.5 ac.
PA 31
VCE
8.0 ac.
PA 30
VCE
5.1 ac.
PA 51
VOS
18.7 ac.
PA 22
VCE
8.4 ac. PA 23
VLDR
54.1 ac.
PA 69
VPR12.1 ac.
PA 21VLDR
25.3 ac.
PA 68VPR
1.0 ac.
PA 19VLDR
11.2 ac.
PA 49
VOS
15.3 ac.
PA 50
VOS
16.1 ac.
PA 20
VCE
5.7 ac.
2.1 ac
VPR
PA 77
1.3 ac
VOS
PA 78
2.9 ac
VOS
PA 87
3.0 ac
VOS
PA 88
PA 56
VOS
10.3 ac.
1.1 ac
VOS
PA 52
PA 67
VPR
1.7 ac.
192.3
681.4
88.0 17.9
12.1 321.3
419.7
60.4 1,832.1 ac.
Acres (ac.)
VCE - Village Country Estates
VLDR - Village Low Density Residential
VMDR - Village Medium Density Residential
VHDR - Village High Density Residential
VPF/VMDR - Village Public Facility
VPR - Village Park / Recreation
VOS - Village Open Space / Corridors
Village Roadways
TOTAL
425
3,113
744
421
39.0 VMU - Village Mixed Use790
117
-
-
-
5,610 du
Dwelling
Units(du) LEGEND
PA 60
VPR
2.0 ac.
PA 76a
VPR
0.5 ac.
PA 55b
VOS
0.5 ac.
PA 71
VPR
1.0 ac.
1.1 ac
VOS
PA 86
0.5 ac
VPR
PA 76b
PA 55a
VOS
0.4 ac.
PA 75b
VPR
0.5 ac.
PA 75a
VPR
0.4 ac.
PA 45
VOS
39.7 ac.
PA 13a
VCE
19.1 ac.
PA 85
VOS
1.2 ac.
PA 16
VHDR
8.1 ac.
1.0 ac
VPR
PA 79
50.0 ac
VCE
PA 36
47.5 ac
VOS
PA 57
6.4 ac
VCE
PA 38
3.8 ac
VCE
PA 37
PA 12
VCE
24.0 ac.
PA 25
SCHOOL/VMDR
12.1 ac.
PA 90
VOS
2.5 ac.
PA 70
VPR
1.0 ac.
PA 81
VOS
2.3 ac.PA 62
VPR
1.2 ac.
PA 63
VPR
3.6 ac.
PA 82
VOS
0.5 ac.
PA 83
VOS
0.7 ac.
PA 84
VOS
0.4 ac. PA 40
VOS
0.8 ac.
Figure 2: Village 1 Land Use Plan
211
REZONE EXHIBIT
STARDUST 12
CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 13, 2024
REZONE EXHIBIT - STARDUST 12
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767 100
200 0
NORTH400
3741 Douglas Blvd, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95816
VMDR
11.0 ± AC.
VOS
1.8 ± AC.
VLDR
5.3 ± AC.
VCE
5.7 ± AC.
VOS
1.8 ± AC.
EXISTING ZONINGPROPOSED ZONING
VOS
VLDR
VLDR
F-B-X
10 AC. MIN.
VCE
F-B-X
10 AC. MIN.
VOS
VLDR
VLDR
F-B-X
10 AC. MIN.
VCE
F-B-X
10 AC. MIN.
ZONING SUMMARY
STARDUST LANE
STARDUST LANE
MCBEAN PARK DRIVE / SR 193MCBEAN PARK DRIVE / SR 193 Attachment 3: Land Use Comparison
212
JT JT
3,675 SF
3,200 SF 3,200 SF3,200 SF 3,200 SF3,200 SF 3,200 SF 3,200 SF 2,400 SF 3,200 SF 3,200 SF 79,265 SF
5,957 SF
18,988 SF
3,400 SF 3,400 SF 3,400 SF
3,400 SF
5,599 SF
5,226 SF
3,360 SF
8,864 SF
3,600 SF
4,571 SF
4,217 SF
3,800 SF
3,896 SF
4,296 SF
3,576 SF
3,560 SF
3,560 SF
4,266 SF
3,580 SF
3,560 SF
3,601 SF
2,699 SF
6,172 SF
3,560 SF
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
75 26
84 83
27 28
29 30
67 68 69 70
66 63
65 64
73 74
61 60
59 77
76 82
48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
62 78
79 80
81 31
32333435363738394041424344454647
72 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
71 103'
96'
85'
89'
88'
87'
86'
40'
40'
40'
80'
85' 80' 80' 80' 80' 79' 83' 80'
121'
93'
95'
95'
95'
92'
90'
125'
30'
30'
84'
90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'90'
90'
40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40'
83' 83' 83' 84' 84' 85' 85' 85' 85'
40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40'
40' 40' 40' 40'
92'
52' 40'
85'85'81'
40'
40'
40'
41'
53'
58'
41'
42' 44'
80' 80' 80'
40'
44'
94' 94'
52' 42' 44' 50'
57'
44'
44'
44'
55'
80' 80'
80'
80'
80'
44'
44'
40'
44'
44' 44'
44'
44'
65'
65'
65'
65'
30'
122'
25'99'48'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'40'44'198' 104'
50'
40'
40'
40'
40'
67'
74'
56' 86' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 30' 40' 40' 40' 40' 46' 100' 27' 95'
40'
54'
80'
83'
75'
40'
14'
77' 50'
80'
85'
55'
61'
80' 80'
53'
55'
80' 80'
55'
92' 140' 140' 95'
92' 92' 95' 95'
9'
38'
22'
8'
38'
17'
53'
85'
55'
81' 80' 80' 80' 80' 80' 86'
40' 40' 30' 40' 40' 40'
40'
44' 40'
85'
948'
82'
950'
84'
4,666 SF 4,281 SF
6,187 SF
7,673 SF
5,737 SF3,263 SF
4,872 SF
40' 31'
30'
40' 40' 40' 40' 40' 40'
42'
65'
80'
80'
80'
52' 41' 42'
40'
936'
590'
592'
65'
40'
40'
40'
7,891 SF
4,065 SF 5,760 SF
5,045 SF 3,324 SF3,372 SF
3,565 SF
4,333 SF
3,522 SF
3,485 SF
3,560 SF
3,208 SF
4,477 SF 4,295 SF 3,336 SF
3,698 SF
3,345 SF 3,363 SF 3,381 SF 3,398 SF
3,698 SF 4,780 SF
3,370 SF
3,643 SF
3,404 SF 3,552 SF
6,184 SF
40'
32'
30'
33'
80'
40' 40'
40'
40' 40'
80'
65'
82'
67'
3,597 SF
96'
52' 40' 40' 40' 40' 55'
40'
3,201 SF
42' 50'
30'
3,964 SF 3,603 SF 3,603 SF3,603 SF 3,602 SF 3,602 SF3,603 SF 3,602 SF 3,602 SF3,602 SF 3,844 SF3,601 SF 3,601 SF 3,601 SF 40'
25'
40' 40' 40' 40' 40'
STREET A
STREET C
COURT A
44'
44'
44'
STREET E
44'
44'
44'
44' 44'
STREET B
44' 44'
44'
LOT D
E.V.A.
0.1 ± AC.
1.8 ± AC.
LOT B
W.Q. BASIN
0.4 ± AC.
C
C
B
AVILA
031-460-085-000
VARMAN
031-460-055-000
STARDUST 80
021-274-040-000
(FUTURE TENTATIVE MAP)
LEAVELL
021-274-065-000
SUNSET TARTESSO LLC
021-750-019-000
McBEAN PARK DRIVE
(84) 40'x80' (TYP.)
10.4 ± AC.
UNIT 1
A
STARDUST LANE (EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD)
25' P.U.E. &
L.S.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
25' P.U.E. &
L.S.E.
44'
C
C
C
44'
44' 44'50'
R=400'
R=400'
R=250'
STREET D
0.1 ± AC.
GATE OR
KNOCK-DOWN
BOLLARDS
McBEAN PARK DRIVE
CENTERLINE
PG&E EASEMENT
PER 20190066775
(TO REMAIN)
EASEMENT PER
598 OR 336
(TO REMAIN)
LOT A
WATER QUALITY/
LANDSCAPE
LOT C
UTILITY
CORRIDOR
R=400'R=400'R=300'R=300'
LEAVELL RANCH ROAD
R=50' R=50'
R=50'
R=25'
R=25'
R=25'
R=50'
B
50'
30' UTILITY ESMT. &
PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS ESMT.
EP
50' I.O.D. FOR
PUBLIC STREET &
HWY PURPOSES
SCALE: 1"=15'
*ARTERIAL (SR 193/McBEAN PARK DRIVE) - ULTIMATE CONDITION 80' PUBLIC STREET EASEMENTA
14'13'
MEDIANTRAVEL LANE
40'
8' 12'
BIKE LANE
/SHOULDER
TRAVEL LANE
40'
CLC
PSEPSE
80'
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
DRAINAGE
(TYP.)
25'
P.U.E./L.S.E.
13'
TRAVEL LANE
12'
TRAVEL LANE BIKE LANE
/SHOULDER
8'
25'
P.U.E./L.S.E.
MULTIUSE
TRAIL
(MEANDERS)
8'
MAX.
DRAINAGE
DITCH
WIDTH
8'
* REFER TO GEOMETRIC APPROVAL DRAWING ACCOMPANYING SUBMITTAL FOR INTERIM VS. ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS.
PLEP
SIERRA COLLEGE BLVD
STARDUST LANE
STAGECOACH LANE
HEATHER
193
MCBEAN PARK DRIVE
PROJECT
SITE
DRIVE
LEAVELL RANCH
ROAD
GREEN HOLLOW
DRIVE
SCALE: 1"=15'
PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL (WITH ON-STREET PARKING)
50' PUBLIC STREET EASEMENTB
* REFER TO GEOMETRIC APPROVAL DRAWING ACCOMPANYING SUBMITTAL FOR INTERIM VS. ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS.
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
18' 3'
25'
12.5'
P.U.E.
4'
WALKTRAVEL LANE
18'3'
25'
12.5'
P.U.E.
4'
WALK TRAVEL LANE
CLC
PSEPSE
50'
PARKING
(TYP.)
C/G C/G
MINOR RESIDENTIAL (WITH ON-STREET PARKING)
SCALE: 1"=15'
44' PUBLIC STREET EASEMENTC
STREET
TREES (TYP.)
15' 3'
22'
12.5'
P.U.E.
4'
WALKTRAVEL LANE
15'3'
22'
12.5'
P.U.E.
4'
WALK TRAVEL LANE
CLC
PSEPSE
44'
PARKING
(TYP.)
C/G C/G
50 FT.
RADIUS
50 FT.
RADIUS
50 FT.
RADIUS
50 FT.RADIUS
OFFSET
CUL-DE-SAC
CONVENTIONAL
CUL-DE-SAC
44 FT.
R/W
25 FT.
RADIUS
50 FT.RADIUS
30 FT.
RADIUS
44 FT.
R/W
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
STARDUST 12
CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 21, 2026
STARDUST 12 - TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3741 Douglas Blvd, Suite 150 Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Roseville, CA 9581660
1200
NORTH 240
NOTE:
1) SUBDIVIDER(S) RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
2) EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY WOOD RODGERS AND WAS FLOWN IN 2024. CITY OF LINCOLN BENCHMARK "LIN-8A."
3) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON MAP, ALL UTILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT.
4) ALL EXISTING RECORDED EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY HAVE BEEN VERIFIED AND ARE SHOWN HEREON.
5) OWNER WILL DEDICATE ALL EASEMENTS AND LETTERED LOTS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ALL ONSITE UTILITIES AND ROADWAYS.
6) A 12.5' P.U.E. SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP.
7) THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.
8) ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING WELLS TO BE REMOVED OR TO REMAIN AS NOTED.
9) THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR TENTATIVE MAP PURPOSES ONLY. ALL SITE CHARACTERISTICS ARE TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL MAP.
10) MASTER UTILITY STUDIES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL. 11) LOT LINES MAY BE ADJUSTED AT THE TIME OF FINAL MAP PROVIDED THAT NO ADDITIONAL LOTS ARE
CREATED AND RESULTING DESIGN IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP. FUTURE PUBLIC LOTS ARE NOT TO BE COUNTED AS "LOTS" TOWARD ANY FUTURE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT.
12) FINAL SUBDIVISION MAPPING SHALL BE PREPARED TO IDENTIFY ALL R/W, IOD'S, AND/OR
PUBLIC/PRIVATE STREETS, IF ANY, NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE CONSTRUCTION PHASING OF THE VILLAGES SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP.
13) ALL PUBLIC STREETS, LIGHTS, AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARDS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN OTHERWISE HEREON.
14) LOTS 26-31 WILL RELINQUISH ACCESS RIGHTS TO STARDUST LANE.
RECORD OWNER
GUERTIN, JAMES B
PO BOX 355
LINCOLN, CA 95648
PHONE: (916) 257-3936
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER
JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC
1478 STONE POINT DRIVE, SUITE 100
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
CONTACT: JOHN JEWETT
PHONE: (530) 550-5525
PLANNER/ENGINEER
WOOD RODGERS INC.
3741 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 150
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
CONTACT:
PLANNER: VANCE JONES
ENGINEER: JASON REED, PE C66631
PHONE: (916) 341-7760
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
021-274-038, -039
AREA
12.8 ± ACRES GROSS
RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZES
AVERAGE: 4,029 SQ. FT.
MAXIMUM: 8,864 SQ. FT.
MINIMUM: 3,200 SQ. FT.
LOT COUNT SUMMARY
84 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS
3 WATER QUALITY/LANDSCAPE LOTS
1 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS LOT
88 LOTS TOTAL
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
COUNTRY ESTATES (CE)
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
OPEN SPACE (OS)
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR)
OPEN SPACE (OS)
EXISTING ZONING
VILLAGE COUNTRY ESTATES (VCE)
VILLAGE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VLDR)
VILLAGE OPEN SPACE (VOS)
PROPOSED ZONING
VILLAGE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(VMDR)
VILLAGE OPEN SPACE (OS)
PARKS & RECREATION
CITY OF LINCOLN
POLICE & FIRE PROTECTION
CITY OF LINCOLN
SCHOOL DISTRICT
WESTERN PLACER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
SEWER
CITY OF LINCOLN
STORM DRAIN
CITY OF LINCOLN
WATER
CITY OF LINCOLN
ELECTRICITY
PG&E
NATURAL GAS
PG&E
PROJECT NOTES
LOCATION MAP
LOT SUMMARY
nts
SHEET 1 OF 3
NORTH
DETAIL 1: CUL-DE-SAC
DETAIL 2: ELBOW
1"=60'
1"=60'
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS
BASED ON THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS
DESCRIBED IN THE PRELIMINARY TITLE
REPORT PREPARED BY PLACER TITLE
COMPANY, ORDER NO. P-625666
DATED MARCH 8, 2024. ALL EASEMENTS
SHOWN IN THE REPORT ARE SHOWN
HEREON OR IF AN EASEMENT IS NOT
PLOTTABLE OR BLANKET, A NOTE TO
THAT EFFECT IS SHOWN HEREON. ANY
PUBLIC EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED
ARE SHOWN AS "TO BE ABANDONED
WITH FINAL MAP (IF APPLICABLE)."
213
Resolution No. 2026-
RESOLUTION 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARING HOUSE # 2010102018) CERTIFYING THAT THE STARDUST 12 PROJECT WILL
NOT RESULT IN ANY NEW SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPORTANCE, NEW
IMPACTS, NEW MITIGATION MEASURES, NEW OR REVISED ALTERNATIVES, OR AN INCREASE IN
THE SEVERITY OF PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED IMPACTS THAT WOULD REQUIRE MAJOR REVISIONS TO THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15162, THE
PREPARATION OF AN ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL OR SUBSEQUENT EIR IS NOT REQUIRED (APPLICANT: JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC / PROPERTY OWNER: JAMES B. GUERTIN)
WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln received an application from JEN California 28, LLC seeking City approval of the Stardust 12 Project; and
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2012, the City Council of the City of Lincoln certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Village 1 Specific Plan (SCH #20 10102018), which analyzed the environmental impacts of development within the 1,832 -acre Specific Plan project area, including up to 5,639 dwelling units at ranges of 1.0 to 25.0 units per acre. Approximately 985 of the 1,832 acres are dedicated to residen tial uses, with approximately 40 acres of mixed - uses that could include residential development, retail, office, and public/semi -public facilities.
Other uses included the existing Turkey Creek Golf Course, open space, parks, an elementary school and city-owned facilities; and
WHEREAS, on September 26, 2023, the City Council certified that the Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan analyzed changes to the Village 1 land use plan, including the realignment of Oak Tree Lane, associated revisions to the land use designations and a reduction in the total number of residential units to 5,610; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Stardust 12 Project includes residential uses and open space uses consistent with the types and density of uses in the Village 1 Specific Pl an, and would not cause the total developable acreage or unit count for Village 1 to exceed the levels assumed in the Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, all mitigation measures identified within the previously certified Final EIR and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program, as revised on September 26, 2023, which is included as Exhibit B, shall remain applicable to the Stardust 12 Project; and
214
Resolution No. 2026-
WHEREAS, the applicable mitigation measures provided within the previously certified Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan have been imposed on and incorporated into the Project as Conditions of Approval, and will mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects; and
WHEREAS, the Project will not substantially modify the location of or area of land disturbance and will retain all lands previously anticipated to be preserved and undisturbed as analyzed in the EIR; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln, as Lead Agency, has determined the Project includes minor land use changes; and an Addendum to the certified EIR has been prepared (provided as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the City consulted with the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria (UAIC) and reached agreement on treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources that could be affected by the Project, with consultation closing on March 3, 2026; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026 , the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the above Environmental Documents, and recommended that the City Council determine the Project would n ot result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the EIR and certify the Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR; and
WHEREAS, notices describing the Stardust 12 Project and the time and place of the City Council hearing, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered was published in the Lincoln News Messenger and sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to Chapter 18.92 of the Lincoln Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2026, the City Council did hold a duly noticed public hearing and, following discussion and public testimony, voted to determine the Project would not result in any new significant environment effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects pervious identified in the EIR.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. All mitigation measures contained within the Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan Project (SCH #2010102018), as revised, shall remain in force and effect and shall, to the extent still relevant, apply to the Project.
215
Resolution No. 2026-
Section 3. Based upon the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and 15162 and the documentation provided in Exhibit A, Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required prior to approval of the proposed entitlements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Exhibits:
A. Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR for the Stardust 12 Project B. Village 1 Specific Plan EIR Mitigation Monitoring Report
216
STARDUST 12 PROJECT IN VILLAGE 1
CEQ
A ADDENDUM
INTRODUCTION
The Stardust 12 project is located within the Village 1 Specific Plan. The Village 1 Specific Plan (Specific Plan) provides direction for development of 1,832 acres of land within the City of Lincoln. The Specific Plan identifies land use designations and zoning for the plan area, the circulation system, utilities systems, parks and open space, and other planning considerations. In addition, the Specific Plan includes a wide range of goals and policies, design guidelines and development standards that will guide development within Village 1.
Th
e City certified an Environmental Impact Report for the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2010102018), adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approved the Specific Plan on November 27, 2012. In 2013, revisions to the Specific Plan and an addendum were adopted to address changes to the Oak Tree Lane connection to Sierra College Boulevard and provision of an additional elementary school site. In 2015, 1,712 acres of the Village 1 Specific Plan were annexed to the City. Approximately 120 acres of the adopted Specific Plan were not included in that annexation due to opposition of the property owners. In March 2020, the Specific Plan was revised, and rezoning was adopted for a portion of the plan area known as Turkey Creek Estates, which occupies 248 acres on the eastern side of the plan area, north of McBean Park Drive. The amendments reduced the amount of land designated Village Country Estates (VCE) and increased the amount of Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) acreage within the northern portion of the Turkey Creek Estates project. This resulted in a reduction of 128 VCE units and a corresponding increase of 128 VLDR units. Parks acreage was also reduced slightly, and there was an increase in the amount of open space. The total amount of developable acreage within the Specific Plan was unchanged. In September 2023, the City Council approved another amendment to the Village 1 Specific Plan, realigning Oak Tree Lane and making minor modifications to the land use plan. As a result, the total number of residential units was reduced to 5,610 from 5,639.
The
Stardust 12 project is proposed for Planning Area (PA) 20, 21-B and 90-B.
The C
alifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15163 state that a lead agency or responsible agency may prepare a Supplement to an EIR if any of the conditions described in Section 15162 for a Subsequent EIR are present, and if only minor additions or changes to the previous EIR are necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation. The following are conditions contained in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would apply to the preparation of a Subsequent EIR:
1. Sub
stantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Sub
stantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which would require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New
information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
Exhibit A
217
a) The project would have new or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
b) Significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the proposed proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or
d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adapt the mitigation measure or alternative.
If there are some changes to the project, or if additional information is needed, but none of the above criteria are met, then the Lead Agency may prepare an addendum (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164).
This Addendum evaluates whether the Stardust 12 project is fully and adequately addressed by the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, as most recently modified and certified. For the reasons discussed below, the proposed Stardust 12 project would not result in new significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of environmental impacts identified in the Village 1 EIR. As discussed below, the changes to the project would not substantially increase any significant impacts identified in the EIR. The discussion in this Addendum focuses on impacts that were found to be significant in the Village 1 EIR, with or without mitigation, and/or for which the proposed Stardust 12 project would result in a substantial change in the severity of a significant impact (either reducing or increasing the severity).
P
ROJECT OVERVIEW
The Stardust 12 project provides for 84 medium density residential units and 1.8 acres of open space on approximately 12.8 acres located within the Village 1 Specific Plan area within the City of Lincoln.
The project as proposed would require that the current land use designations and zones be changed from VLDR and VCE to Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR).
Project Location
The project site is located in the City of Lincoln south of McBean Park Drive and west of Stardust Lane within the Village 1 Specific Plan (see Figures 1 and 2). The Assessor’s Parcel Numbers are 021-274- 038-000 and 021- 274-039-000. The project site is bounded by McBean Park Drive to the north, Stardust Lane to the east, the recently -approved Stardust subdivision to the south, and a vacant Village 1 VLDR-zoned parcel to the west.
Primary access to the project site would be provided by a connection to the future Leavell Ranch Road.
An emergency vehicle access (EVA) would connect to Stardust Lane.
The project site is currently zoned VLDR (5.3 acres), VCE (5.7 acres) and Village Open Space (VOS) (1.8 acres).
The project site is undeveloped. The project site slopes range from 5% to 10%. The project site consists primarily of oak woodland, with a grassland understory and some scattered rock outcroppings.
Proposed Project Components
A total of 84 VMDR units are proposed for 10.4 acres, resulting in a density of approximately 8.1 units per acre. The current zoning allows for a maximum of 2.9 units per acre for VCE and 5.9 units per acre VLDR.
Exhibit A
218
Because the proposed project density is greater than allowed under the current zoning, the applicant is requesting that the entire project site, with the exception of the 1.8 acres of VOS, be rezoned VMDR.
Table 1 and Figure 3 compare the existing and proposed land use designation/zoning for the project site.
Under the current zoning, the total number of units that could be developed on the project site is 48. The project proposes to construct 84 units, an increase in 36 units. However, the total number of units allowed within the Village 1 plan area would not be increased, due to reductions elsewhere in the plan area. The applicant also developed the recently-approved Parkwood project with 42 fewer units than the zoning for that site allowed. Therefore, the applicant is proposing to apply 36 of the 42 units from the Parkwood project to the proposed Stardust 12 project. The layout of the proposed project is shown in Figure 4.
Table 1
Land Use Comparison
Land Use/Zone Adopted Specific
Plan Acreage
Proposed
Acreage
Difference
Village Country Estates (VCE) 5.7 0.0 -5.7
Village Low Density Residential
(VLDR)
5.3 0.0
-5.3
Village Medium Density
Residential (VMDR)
0.0 11 +11.0
Village Open Space
(VOS)
1.8 1.8 0
Total 12.8 12.8 0
The 84 residences built within the project site would be single or two story. All units would be single family.
Lots would range from 30 to 65 feet in width (most lots would be 40 feet wide) and 80 to 125 feet in depth.
Residential parcels would range in size from 3,200 to 8,864 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,029 square feet. With one exception, the largest parcels would be located along the eastern boundary of the project site.
Circulation
Access to the project site would be provided by a connection to Leavell Ranch Road (formerly called the Oak Tree Lane extension), which connects north to McBean Park Drive. If the proposed project is constructed prior to completion of the portion of Leavell Ranch Road required to obtain access to the project site, the project would be responsible for constructing that roadway portion to McBean Park Drive. This section of Leavell Ranch Road is planned to have single travel lanes in each direction, with bike/NEV lanes and separated sidewalks on each side.
The proposed project would also construct improvements along McBean Park Drive to conform with the ultimate layout of the southern half of the road along the project boundary. That portion of McBean Park Drive is planned to have a 14- foot median, two travel lanes, a bike lane/shoulder, drainage ditch and multiuse trail.
An emergency vehicle access (EVA) would connect to Stardust Lane, adjacent to the eastern project boundary. It would be gated with an override for emergency vehicles to access the site, or knock-down bollards would be installed.
Utilities
New onsite and offsite infrastructure are proposed to be constructed as part of the project consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan. Water, sewer and drainage services will be provided by the City of Lincoln. Under the Village 1 Specific Plan, major water, sewer and dry utility lines will be placed within the Leavell Ranch Road right-of-way, connecting to lines in McBean Park Drive. The proposed project Exhibit A
219
would connect to water lines in Leavell Ranch Road via the project access road. A sewer line would connect directly to McBean Park Drive through a utility corridor (see Figure 4).
A water quality basin would be constructed within the southwestern corner of the project site (Lot B) to collect and treat project stormwater runoff. A bioretention basin would also be constructed in the western half of the VOS parcel.
Offsite Improvements
The proposed project includes two offsite components. First, the two-lane connection to Leavell Ranch Road would be constructed offsite, immediately west of the project site (See Figure 4). Second, the proposed project would construct frontage improvements along McBean Park Drive to conform to the ultimate design of this roadway segment (see Figure 4), including an additional vehicle lane, bike lane, drainage ditch and separated, multiuse trail.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Aesthetics and Visual Quality
The Village 1 EIR found that changes in the visual character of the plan area would be a significant and unavoidable impact due to the conversion of open views of agricultural land and oak woodlands to an urban and suburban development (Impact 4.1-2). The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations documenting that the benefits of the Specific Plan outweighed the environmental effects, including changes in visual quality. The EIR also found that the introduction of lighting into the plan area would be mitigated to a less -than-significant level with mitigation requiring that all light standards be shielded and directed downward (Impact 4.1-3).
The proposed Stardust 12 project would not substantially alter the severity of visual impacts identified in the Village 1 EIR . The proposed project would alter existing v iews from McBean Park Drive and Stardust Lane by converting the existing vacant land to urban uses. Along McBean Park Drive, the views would change to an expanded roadway, with a bike lane, landscaping, a multiuse trail and a wall, similar to existing and future views along this roadway. The second stories of houses may be visible as well.
The primary views of the project site from Stardust Lane would be of fencing. Roofs and second stories may also be visible, and a small view of the project development would be possible from the EVA connection. The Specific Plan provided for single-family homes backing up to Stardust Lane, and the project development must comply with the design standards of the Specific Plan, so the visual character of the proposed project would be consistent with the Specific Plan and Village 1 EIR conclusions. As required by the Village 1 General Development Plan, building heights in the V MDR zone are limited to two stories or 36 feet. The project has been designed with wider lots adjacent to Stardust Lane than required for VMDR units. As a result, the six units adjacent to Stardust Lane under the proposed project is only two more than the four that would be allowed under the VC E zone. The spacing of units on this edge would be greater than the Stardust project to the south, which is zoned VLDR, adjacent to Stardust Lane. In addition, the lots adjacent to Stardust Lane would be deeper than most other units in the project site, and the General Development Plan would be revised to require 20- foot rear yard setbacks from the eastern boundary, similar to the setback requirement for VLDR County-adjacent rear lots.
The project site is not visible from a scenic highway, existing public gathering areas (e.g., parks) or roadways, or from existing residential areas. Therefore, the development would not alter existing, publicly-accessible views, and no new visual impacts would occur.
The proposed project would introduce new sources of light; however, compliance with Mitigation Measure 4.1-3 (shielding light fixtures and directing them downward) would ensure that the impact is not more severe than indicated in the Village 1 EIR.
Exhibit A
220
Impacts Associated with Ground Disturbance
The proposed project would not alter the amount of Open Space or the acreage to be disturbed within the Village 1 Specific Plan. Therefore, impacts due to ground disturbance and development would be consistent with the assumptions of the EIR. Furthermore, as discussed in more detail below, the proposed project would comply with mitigation measures and regulations that would reduce the impacts associated with ground disturbance.
The proposed project identifies two offsite improvements—the two-lane connection to Leavell Ranch Road west of the project site and frontage improvements along McBean Park Drive. The construction of Leavell Ranch Road and roadway improvements to McBean Park Drive are shown in the Village 1 Specific Plan, and were therefore considered in the Village 1 EIR at a programmatic level. B ecause this area was assumed to be developed in the Village 1 Specific Plan and EIR, it would not increase the area of disturbance for the Specific Plan as a whole, nor increase the impac ts associated with ground disturbance.
Agriculture
The project site is designated “Farmland of Local Importance” on the Important Farmland map 1, which
is not considered Important Farmland, and is not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, development of the project site would not result in the substantial loss of agricultural resources (Impacts 4.2-1 and 4.2-2).
Biological Resources
A Biological Resources Assessment was prepared for the project site and the offsite improvements.
The primary habitat within the project site is mixed oak woodland, occupying approximately 13.8 acres of the project site and offsite areas. Other habitat includes approximately 2.8 acres of blue oak woodland along the southern border and within the offsite connection to Leavell Ranch Road, annual grassland, and oak savannah. The northeast corner of the project site is ruderal habitat. The study area also includes road and rural residential areas
2. There are no aquatic resources within the project site or offsite improvement areas. 3 The project site provides potential habitat for a small number of special -status species. Big -scale balsam root, a special-status plant, could occur within annual grasslands and oak forest and woodland.
A reconnaissance level survey was conducted during the blooming period for this species, and it was not observed. The project site provides potential foraging habitat for the following special-status bird species: tricolored blackbird, burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk and white-tailed kite. Nesting habitat is also present in the project site for these species, with the exception of tricolored blackbird. The potential of occurrence is considered low for tricolored blackbird and burrowing owl, moderate for Swainson’s hawk and high for white- tailed kite. The project site also provides low potential for occurrence of Crotch’s bumble bee, a candidate for listing under the California Endangered Species Act, which typically occurs in open grasslands and scrub habitats with suitable floral resources. The study area lacks a high density of floral resources , but the oak woodland could support flowing populations within the understory and ground squirrel burrows could provide potential nesting and overwintering habitat.
4 The Stardust 12 project would replace the natural habitats with residential development, streets and associated facilities. As a result, there would be the potential loss of one special-status plant species habitat (Impact 4.4-3), the loss of oak woodlands (Impact 4.4-14) and potential loss of habitat and/or 1 City of Lincoln, Draft Environmental Impact for the Village 1 Specific Plan, May 2012, Figure 4.2-1. 2 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Stardust Property, November 2025, Figure 3. 3 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Stardust Property, November 2025, page 2. 4 Madrone Ecological Consulting, Biological Resources Assessment, Stardust Property, November 2025, Table 4.
Exhibit A
221
disturbance of nesting habitat for several bird species (Impacts 4.4- 5 through 4.4-8, 4.4-10 and 4.4- 16). The Village 1 EIR anticipated development of this area, so the loss of biological resources would not result in new or substantially more sever e impacts on biological resources. In addition, the mitigation measures identified in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, of the EIR, which must be implemented by the Stardust 12 project, would reduce impacts on biological resources to a less-than- significant level. These measures include rare plant and nesting bird surveys prior to initiation of ground disturbance, and ensur e compensation for loss of oak woodlands. Because the Crotch’s bumble bee is not a listed species and its potential to occur within the project site is low, the impact on this species would not be significant.
Since the Village 1 Specific Plan was originally adopted, Placer County prepared and adopted the Placer County Conservation Plan (PCCP), which addresses many of the special -status species and habitats that are identified in the Village 1 EIR. In 2020, t he City of Lincoln adopted the PCCP and made findings that the PCCP EIS/EIR adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the PCCP, including the environmental effects of future development. The City’s adoption of the PCCP requires that development projects participate in the PCCP in order to mitigate the effects on those species addressed by PCCP and that would be adversely affected by the project development. Therefore, Village 1 mitigation measures addressing species covered by the PCCP have been supplanted by the requirement to comply with the PCCP.
Therefore, for those species and habitats covered by the PCCP, the Stardust 12 applicant shall comply with the PCCP rather than implementing the Village 1 EIR biological resources mitigation measures for t hose PCCP -covered species . The PCCP is a regional, comprehensive program intended to protect, enhance, and restore natural resources in western Placer County, while streamlining permitting for urban development. The PCCP includes three program components:
• The Western Placer County Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan (Plan), a joint habitat conservation plan and natural community conservation plan (HCP/NCCP) that would protect fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats and fulf ill the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), and the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (NCCPA). • The Western Placer County Aquatic Resources Program (CARP) that would protect streams, wetlands, and other water resources and fulfill the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and analogous state laws and regulations.
• The Western Placer County In- Lieu Fee Program (ILF Program) that fulfills compensatory mitigation requirements under Section 404 of the CWA.
5 The PCCP encompasses approximately 270,000 acres in western Placer County, including the City of Lincoln. It addresses a wide range of habitat and species, including several species each of fish, invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Most of the special-status species that could occur within the project site are covered by the PCCP, including burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, and tricolored blackbird.
6 The PCCP is also designed to provide for conservation of landscapes and natural communities through establishment of a reserve system, stream protection measures, and wetland conservation with no net loss of wetland values or function. For example, the loss of oak woodlands could be mitigated through payment of the PCCP fee, which would be used to preserve and/or enhance areas with these habitats.
For those habitats or species that are not covered by the PCCP, a project would need to implement 5 Placer County, Placer County Conservation Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, May 2020, Table 2-11, page 1-1.
6 Placer County, Placer County Conservation Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, May 2020, Table 2-11, page 2-39.
Exhibit A
222
the applicable CEQA mitigation. In the case of the Stardust 12 project , one plant species could be affected (big-scale balsamroot) and the PCCP does not address plants. Therefore, the project would still need to implement Mitigation Measure 4.4- 3, which addresses rare plant species. Mitigation Measures 4.4-13, which addresses ambient light affecting wildlife, would also need to be implemented even if the applicant paid the PCCP fee.
Cultural and Paleontological Resources
At the time that the Village 1 EIR was prepared, only portions of the plan area had been surveyed for cultural resources. Mitigation Measures 4.5-1 and 4.5-2 require that surveys for historically significant and archaeological resources be conducted for those areas that had not been previously surveyed. In addition, for those resources that had been previously identified, they should be evaluated for eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NHRP) and California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR).
As required by Mitigation Measures 4.5-1 and 4.5-2, an evaluation of cultural resources located within the project site and two areas proposed for offsite infrastructure was prepared by ECORP Consulting, Inc., including a records search and a field verification visit. The entire site was subject to the pedestrian survey using 15-meter transects.
7 Three historic resources were identified. Two, the Leavell Ranch Granite Quarry and a Nevada Irrigation District Ditch, had been identified in previous surveys. A third historic resource was identified by ECORP—Stardust Lane— which abuts the eastern boundary of the project site, and which is shown on an 1891 USGS map. None of these resources were determined to be eligible for listing on either the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historic Resources.
No prehistoric resources had been identified in previous surveys, and ECORP did not identify any during their survey. Nonetheless, there is a moderate potential for subsurface resources to be present within the project site.8
The Stardust 12 project would disturb the same area assumed to be disturbed in the Village 1 EIR, so the potential to damage or destroy undiscovered archaeological resources and/or paleontological resources would be unchanged. Although no archaeological resources were identified during the survey, subsurface resources could be present. Construction activities, particularly grading and excavation could damage or destroy such resources, if any are present. Mitigation Measure 4.5- 3(a) requires that preconstruction training be given to all construction personnel involved in grading or excavation to inform them of how to identify cultural resources that might be uncovered during ground disturbance. In addition, a certified tribal monitor must be hired to monitor areas that have been deemed to be culturally sensitive. Mitigation Measure 4.5- 3(b) lays out the process to follow if previously unidentified subsurface archaeological or tribal resources are discovered during construction. Mitigation Measure 4.5- 4 identifies the steps to take should human remains be discovered. For any prehistoric site that is discovered, and that qualifies as a historical resource or unique archaeological resource, Mitigation Measure 4.5- 2 requires that standard professional procedures be implemented in consultation with those traditionally and culturally associated with the project site . The standard professional procedures includ e, but are not limited to, avoidance, protection, written and photographic documentation, or other measures identified in California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 and/or by the tribe.
For areas that would be disturbed, Mitigation Measures 4.5-2 through 4.5-5 would ensure that the 7 ECORP Consulting, Inc., Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Stardust 12 Property Project, Placer County,, California, November 2025, page 27.
8 ECORP Consulting, Inc., Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Stardust 12 Property Project, Placer County,, California, November 2025, page 39.
Exhibit A
223
resources are protected from harm, evaluated, and handled by qualified professionals.
Tribal Cultural Resources
Although no prehistoric resources were identified within the project site during the archaeological survey, there could be resources present that are important to local tribes. Mitigation Measure 4.5-2, as revised in September 2023, outlines the process for consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Village 1 plan area, and that requested notification pursuant to AB 52. The City notified the United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) of the proposed Stardust 12 project, and shared the finding of the Cultural Resources Report that no prehistoric resources were identified during site surveys. Representatives of the UAIC and the applicant, along with City staff, conducted one site visit on January 9, 2026 during consultation.
Negotiation with the tribe resulted in agreement with respect to onsite monitoring and construction activities, and consultation was closed on March 3, 2026.
Hazardous Materials
The EIR identified several potential impacts due to potential contamination, including exposure to soil or groundwater contamination due to past agricultural and other uses (Impacts 4.7-2 and 4.7-4), and/or lead-based paint and asbestos in structures to be demolished (Impact 4.7-3). Mitigation Measure 4.7- 2 requires that a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) be prepared prior to approval of a specific development permit, and that any recommendations of the Phase 1 ESA be implemented.
As required by MM 4.7- 2(a), a Phase 1 ESA was prepared for the project site. 9 The Phase 1 ESA
reported that the project site is vacant, and has been undeveloped since at least 1891. A records search and site reconnaissance did not find any evidence of soil, soil gas or groundwater impairments due to current or past use of the project site. Database searches did not identify any documentation of hazardous materials violations or discharge on the property, or contaminated sites in proximity to the project site.
10 The Phase 1 ESA concludes that there is no evidence of hazardous materials on the project site, and that no additional study is needed at this time.11
Because no contaminated sites or hazardous features were identified on the project site or in th e immediate vicinity, construction workers and project occupants would not be exposed to substantial health risks associated with existing contaminated soils, and the Stardust 12 project would not alter the severity of impacts related to hazardous materials.
The Village 1 EIR also addressed hazardous materials impacts resulting from the abandoned Titan missile base. The Stardust 12 project site is not located on parcels that are affected by the abandoned missile base, and, therefore, is not subject to contamination from the base.
Hydrology and Water Quality
The amount of acreage that would be developed under the proposed project would be consistent with the Village 1 EIR assumptions. The proposed project would increase stormwater runoff over existing conditions, and therefore potentially increase flood volumes requiring storage (Impacts 4.8-1, 4.8-2,
4.8-7 and 4.8-9), as well as the potential degradation of stormwater runoff due to erosion and/or urban contaminants (Impacts 4.8-4, 4.8-5 and 4.8-9). These impacts were fully addressed in the Village 1 EIR, and the mitigation measures identified in Section 4.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, would be required of the Stardust 12 project, and would be adequate to reduce impacts related to water quality, flooding and hydrology to a less-than-significant level.
9 Engeo, Stardust, Lincoln, California Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, May 15, 2024. 10 Engeo, Stardust, Lincoln, California Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, May 15, 2024, page 1. 11 Engeo, Stardust, Lincoln, California Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, May 15, 2024, page 12.
Exhibit A
224
Land Use
The Stardust 12 project would not substantially alter the potential for land use conflicts within the plan area, because the same types of uses (single-family homes) as provided for in the Specific Plan would be developed (Impact 4.9-1).
There are agricultural uses immediately east of the project site. For the most part, lands adjacent to the project site are used for rural residential and low -intensity agriculture, such as grazing.
Nonetheless, project residents could find some attributes associated with livestock to be a nuisance, such as odors and flies. The project has been designed with wider lots adjacent to Stardust Lane than required for VMDR units. As a result, the six units adjacent to Stardust Lane under the proposed project are only two more than the four that would be allowed under the VCE zone. The spacing of units on this edge would be greater than the Stardust project to the south, which is zoned VLDR adjacent to Stardust Lane. In addition, the lots adjacent to Stardust Lane would be deeper than most other units in the project site, and buildings would need to be setback at least 20 feet from the eastern project boundary. Mitigation Measure 4.9-1(b) requires homebuyers of residences adjacent to active agricultural operations to be provided information regarding the agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities, including a copy of the Placer County Right -to-Farm Ordinance. This measure would apply to VMDR parcels proposed along the eastern boundary of the plan area, and would ensure that homeowners are aware of the agricultural activities that could occur in the vicinity. This mitigation measure, in combination with the required setbacks between the project site and adjacent agricultural uses, would ensure that the potential conflicts between project residences and adjacent rural areas would continue to be less than significant.
Noise
There are existing residences located along Stardust Lane that would be subjected to construction noise during project development. Mitigation Measure 4.10- 2 would reduce impacts associated with construction activities to a less -than-significant level by limiting construction hours, locating staging areas away from residential areas, muffling construction equipment and notifying residents within 300 feet of project site when construction will occur. Because the proposed project would not alter the area being developed, this measure would continue to be adequate to address project construction.
The proposed project would not substantially alter traffic generated by Village 1, so there would be no change in future traffic noise levels (Impacts 4.10-1 and 4.10-4). As discussed above, the number of units proposed project would exceed the number allowed under the current zoning, by approximately 36 units. However, the total number of units allowed within the Specific Plan area would be unchanged.
For example, the recently -approved Parkwood project would construct 42 fewer units than allowed under its zoning. Therefore, the distribution of residential units would change, but not the total number.
This shift would affect internal traffic volumes to some extent, but because most residents would use Oak Tree Lane/Leavell Ranch Road, there would not be a substantial shift in traffic, or in traffic-related noise.
As shown in Village 1 Draft EIR Table 4.10-12, the 60 dBA Ldn contour will be approximately 207 feet from the centerline of Oak Tree Lane (now Leavell Ranch Road). Residents within these contours could be exposed to exterior and interior noise levels that exceed City standards. Mitigation Measure
4.10-5(a) requires that one or more measures be included to reduce noise levels for residences in areas where the external noise levels would exceed 60 dBA Ldn, such as noise barriers, windows with a minimum sound rating of 32 and no exterior wall cavities. These measures would ensure that project residents would not be exposed to unacceptable traffic noise levels.
Traffic, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Traffic
Since the Specific Plan was adopted, the CEQA Guidelines have been revised to shift the analysis of traffic impacts from Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). After July 1, 2020, EIRs Exhibit A
225
must analyze a project’s effect on VMT, and LOS can no longer be used as a standard of significance for CEQA purposes. The Village 1 Specific Plan EIR did not address VMT , because LOS was the standard of significance used to evaluate traffic impacts at time of adoption. While changes in LOS are no longer evaluated under CEQA, the City does have General Plan policies that address LOS.
Because the Stardust 12 project would not alter the total number of single family units within the Village 1 plan area, the project would not change the number of vehicle trips. As discussed above, there would be some internal shifts in the distribution of those trips due to the increase in the number of units associated with the proposed project, and the reduction of units elsewhere in the plan area. This would affect the level of traffic primarily on Oak Tree Lane/Leavell Ranch Road within the plan area, which would continue to operate within acceptable service level standards based on the projected capacity for Oak Tree Lane.
12 Consequently, the Stardust 12 project would not alter the conclusions of the EIR with respect to levels of service. Further, it would not increase the number of vehicle miles traveled associated with the Specific Plan (Section 14 of the Draft EIR). In addition, as required by Mitigation Measure 4.14- 7, the Stardust 12 project would contribute its fair share toward the funding of improvements identified as mitigation.
The Village 1 Specific Plan EIR also analyzed the effects of the Specific Plan on transit demand (Impact 4.14-5) and pedestrian, bicycle and NEV vehicle use (Impact 4.14- 6). No changes to the provision of transit, bicycle/NEV lanes or pedestrian facilities are proposed by the Stardust 12 project.
A b ike lane and separated multi -use trail will be provided on the portion of McBean Park Drive constructed by the project; therefore, these impacts would continue to be less than significant under the proposed project.
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction activities would generate dust and construction vehicle emissions (Impact 4.3- 1).
Because the amount of construction associated with the project would be similar to that assumed in the EIR, particularly when combined with the reduction in units to be developed elsewhere in the Specific Plan area, this increase would not be enough to substantially increase daily emissions levels.
Furthermore, project construction would comply with Mitigation Measure 4.3- 1, which requires dust control and other measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction. Therefore, the short- term significant and unavoidable impact due to construction emissions would not be more severe than identified in the Village 1 EIR.
Motor vehicle use is one of the major sources of both air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
The proposed Stardust 12 project would not alter the total number of dwelling units or the amount of commercial development within the Village 1 plan area. Therefore, t he amount of vehicle and other emissions generated would be consistent with the EIR assumptions, and the conclusions of the EIR would not change (Impacts 4.3-2, 4.3-3, 4.3-5, 4.3-6 and 4.6-1).
Parks and Open Space
New development within Lincoln is required to provide both preserved open space and traditional parks. The Village 1 Specific Plan includes 40% of open space (732.8 acres) which is consistent with the General Plan open space requirement. In reviewing the appropriate amount of park land within a development project, the City considers the amount of parkland anticipated in the Village 1 Specific Plan, the General Plan park standards, and the unique characteristics of the individual project.
The City of Lincoln General Plan establishes a standard of 3 acres of Neighborhood Park, 3 acres of open space and 3 acres of citywide parks per 1,000 residents within any project that is approved subject to a Development Agreement, which is required for this project. The Village 1 Specific Plan adjusted the requirement for neighborhood parks to 2.43 acres per 1,000 residents, due 12 DKS, Lincoln Village 1—Revised Transportation Analysis, July 5, 2002, Tables 2 through 9.
Exhibit A
226
to the large amount of open space provided within Village 1.13 The Village 1 Specific Plan establishes the household population (number of persons expected per household) for various residential densities. The assumed household population of medium density residential development is 2.8 persons per household14. Given the project proposes to construct a maximum of 84 homes, it is assumed that the Stardust 12 project will have approximately 235 residents at build out. Therefore, the Stardust 12 project would be required to provide for acres 0.70 of open space, 0.70 acres of regional park and 0.57 acres of neighborhood park.
The project’s obligation for 0.70 acres of open space would be fully met through the preservation of approximately 1.8 acres of open space on site. The proposed project does not provide any neighborhood or community parks or related facilities, and the Specific Plan does not identify any of these facilities within the project site. Therefore, t he project’s obligation for neighborhood and community parks would be met through the payment of park fees. As required by Mitigation Measure 4.12-7, these fees would off-set the cost of constructing the neighborhood and community parks planned within the Village 1 plan area, which could include developing the remainder of the lake front in the western portion of the Specific Plan area, other recreational amenities, or other park sites.
Other Public Services and Utilities
The Village 1 EIR found that the increased demand for law enforcement, fire protection and public schools would not result in significant environmental effects (Impacts 4.12- 1 through 4.12- 6). The Stardust 12 project would not alter the total number of residential units, commercial square footage or residents within Village 1 at buildout, so these impacts would remain less than significant.
The Village 1 Specific Plan area, including the project site, is in an area designated Moderate on the CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones mapping, and is therefore not considered at substantial risk of wildfire.
15 Similarly, because the Stardust 12 projec t would not alter the total number of residential units or commercial square footage within the Village 1 plan area, and would install infrastructure needed to serve both the project and future Village 1 development, there would be no change in demand for water supply, and generation of wastewater, energy and solid waste (Impacts 4.13- 1 through 4.13- 12).
C
ONCLUSION
As indicated in the above analysis, the proposed Stardust 12 project would not result in a new significant impact or an impact that is substantially more severe than what was identified in the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, and no revisions to the EIR, including mitigation measures, are necessary to address the impacts of the project. Therefore, the proposed Stardust 12 project would not result in any conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and a subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required.
13 Frayji Design Group, Inc., Village 1 Infrastructure and Facilities Financing Plan (Financing Plan), Volume 2, Infrastructure and Phasing Plan, April 9, 2016, page 32 and Appendix 26. 14 City of Lincoln, Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Village 1 Specific Plan, May 2012, page 4.12-19. 15 CAL FIRE, City of Lincoln-Placer County, Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones, January 22, 2025.
Exhibit A
227
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
1 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.1 Aesthetics and Visual Quality
4.1-3 The
proposed project
would introduce
light and glare
into the project
area.
4.1-3(a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that no light falls onto adjacent properties.
4.1-3(b) Surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open space, parks or residential neighborhoods shall not have reflective surfaces large enough to generate glare that creates a nuisance or safety hazard.
4.1-3I i. If future uses within any park include nighttime activities requiring overhead lights, the project applicant shall use site design and orientation in combination with a configuration of exterior light fixtures that emphasize close spacing and lower intensity light that is directed downward in order to minimize exposure of adjacent uses to lighting and to minimize the amount of light that is visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture.
ii.a. Activity-related lights (as opposed to security lighting) shall be turned off no later than 10:00 p.m. to reduce the amount of disruption to adjacent receptors; and/or
ii.b. The City shall place a nuisance easement over parcels that will have direct views of such lights.
Applicant O DSD
4.3 Air Quality
4.3-1
Construction of
the proposed
project would
generate
emissions of
PM10 and PM2.5,
ROG, NOx, and
CO.
4.3-1 The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by the applicant(s) during all grading activities:
4.3-1(a) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant(s) shall submit to the City of Lincoln, as the lead agency, and receive approval of a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan. The plan shall be submitted to the PCAPCD for review and comment prior to approval by the City. This plan must address the minimum Administrative Requirements found in section 300 and 400 of PCAPCD Rule 228, Fugitive Dust.
Applicant G/C PSD
PCAPCD
228
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
2 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.3-1 (continued)
4.3-1(b) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e. make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower of greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. The project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreperson. The project shall provide a plan for approval by the District demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off- road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet- average up to 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent particulate reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average. The District should be contacted for average fleet emission data. Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late model engines, low-emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after-treatment products, and/or other options as they become available.
Applicant P, C PSD
PCAPCD
4.3-1(c) In order to control dust, an operational watering truck shall be on site during construction hours. In addition, dry chemical sweeping is prohibited. Watering at the construction site shall be carried out in the compliance with operating APCD rules and City of Lincoln requirements.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(d) The contractor shall suspend all grading operations when fugitive dusts exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations. The prime contractor shall be responsible for having an individual, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), who shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust, on a weekly basis. Fugitive dust is not to exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond property
boundary at any time. If lime or other drying agents are used to dry out wet grading areas they shall be controlled as to not exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(e) The prime contractor shall be responsible for keeping adjacent public thoroughfares clean of silt, dirt, mud, and debris, and shall “wet broom” the streets (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City) if silt, dirt, mud or debris is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(f) The prime contractor shall apply methods such as surface stabilization, establishment of the vegetative cover, paving, or other methods to control dust approved by the City.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(g) The prime contractor shall apply water or use other method to control dust impacts offsite. Construction vehicles leaving the site shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site.
Applicant C PSD
229
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
3 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.3-1(h) No open burning of removed vegetation shall be allowed unless permitted by the PCAPCD. All removed vegetation material shall either be chipped on site or taken to an appropriate recycling site, or if a recycling site is not available, a licensed disposal site.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(i) Traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 miles per hour or less. Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(j) The prime contractor shall suspend all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous gusts) are high (typically winds greater than 25 miles per hour), and dust is traveling off-site.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(k) If required by the Engineering Division and/or the Department of Public Works, the contractor shall hold a pre-construction meeting prior to any grading activities. The contractor may invite the PCAPCD to the pre-construction meeting in order to discuss the construction emission/dust control plan with employees and/or contractors.
Applicant C PSD
PCAPCD
4.3-1(l) Stockpiles of dirt shall be covered when not being used or otherwise controlled to prevent erosion and/or dust.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-1(m) During construction, the contractor shall use existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean fuel (e.g., gasoline, biodiesel, natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators where feasible.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-(n) A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) caused by the use or manufacture of Cutback or Emulsified asphalts for paving, road construction or road maintenance, unless such manufacture or use complies with the provisions of Rule 217.
Applicant C PSD
4.3-2 Operation of
the proposed
project would
generate criteria
pollutant
emissions (ROG,
NOx, CO, PM10,
and PM2.5).
4.3-2(a) Wood burning or pellet appliances shall not be allowed in any residential units. Only natural gas or propane fired fireplace appliances shall be installed.
Applicant B DSD
4.3-2(b) Where natural gas is available, gas outlets shall be provided in residential backyards for use with outdoor cooking appliances, such as gas barbecues.
Applicant B DSD
4.3-2(c) For those projects that include stationary sources (e.g., gasoline dispensing facility, dry cleaning, large HVAC units), the applicant shall obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) permit prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Applicant O DSD
4.3-2(d) Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, the applicant shall show that a Class 1, 2, or 3 bicycle lane(s) is provided in areas as approved by the Engineering Division and/or the Department of Public Works (or similar divisions within each jurisdiction), as defined elsewhere in these conditions of approval.
Applicant G PSD
230
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.3-2(e) Prior to Design Review Approval, the Site Plan shall show that the applicant has provided the appropriate number of preferential parking spaces for employees that carpool/vanpool/rideshare as well as the appropriate preferential parking for NEVs as required by the District and City Policy. Such stalls shall be clearly demarcated with signage as approved by the approving committee.
Applicant G DSD
4.3-2(f) Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that on-stie bicycle racks are provided.
Applicant B DSD
4.3-5 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
criteria air
pollutant
emissions.
4.3-5(a) At the time a final map is submitted, the City, in coordination with PCAPCD, shall calculate the emissions associated with the land uses to be approved under that particular tentative map. Based on that calculation, the applicant shall do one or a combination of the following to ensure NOx emissions do not exceed 10 lbs within the full Plan Area. Once the 10 lbs per day has been reached, subsequent projects must demonstrate no net increase in NOx emissions. The City shall consult with the PCAPCD to determine whether the measures proposed by the applicant would fully offset project emissions.
i) Reduce emissions on-site by incorporating design features that would reduce NOx emissions. These features may include, but would not be limited to, energy conservation or “green” building features such solar panels, energy efficient heating and cooling, energy star appliances, and/or measures that would reduce vehicle use, such as bike lockers and transit services, as provided for in Mitigation Measure 4.6-1.
ii) Reduce emissions off-site within the same region (i.e., City of Lincoln, Placer County) by participating in an offsite mitigation program coordinated by the PCAPCD and/or by funding energy-efficiency measures (e.g., installation of insulation and/or dual pane windows in existing buildings), vehicle emission reduction measures (e.g., replace diesel school buses with natural gas buses), and/or trip-reduction measures (e.g., bike lanes and/or NEV lanes on streets that do not have them).
iii) Participate in the Placer County Air Pollution District Offsite Mitigation Program by paying fees based on the project’s contribution of pollutants (ROG and NOx), adjusted by credit received for any applicable measures implemented by the project on or offsite. The actual amount to be paid shall be determined, and Applicant I DSD
PCAPCD
4.4 Biological Resources
4.4-3 The
proposed project
could result in
4.4-3(a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys in seasonal wetlands and non-native annual grassland habitats within the project site for special-status plant species including but not limited to big-scale balsamroot, Applicant P DSD
231
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
5 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
the loss and/or
degradation of
rare plant
populations.
Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop, dwarf downingia, legenere, and pincushion navarretia during the appropriate time of year (March through June). If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no further mitigation would be required.
4.4-3(b) If Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop is located during the surveys in areas that would be disturbed by project construction, those populations shall be avoided and preserved in place to the extent feasible.
Applicant P,C DSD
4.4-3(c) If avoidance is not feasible, the project applicant shall consult with CDFG to obtain an incidental take permit, under Section 2081 of the CESA. Mitigation can be accomplished either in the onsite mitigation preserve area, or at an approved offsite mitigation bank. The ratio of mitigation credits shall be determined during this consultation, and may be conducted concurrently with Mitigation Measure 4.4-2.
Applicant P,C DSD
CDFG
4.4-3(d) If any other special-status vernal pool plant species, including, but not limited to dwarf downingia and legenere are located during the surveys in areas that cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-2, with the addition of soil/seed bank salvage, for use in created wetlands in mitigation areas.
Applicant P,C DSD
CDFG
4.4-3(e) If the plants cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall consult with the City and the CDFG regarding steps to take to offset the loss of the plants on the project site, such as transplantation, collecting seed or clippings and replanting species in an onsite location, prior to approval of a discretionary permit. At a minimum, at least ten (10) days prior to mass grading in the area that supports special-status plants, the project applicant shall notify the City and CDFG that grading is to occur and aid the CDFG with collection of the plant seeds, if the CDFG so chooses, pursuant to the California Native Plant Protection Act.
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
232
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
6 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.4-5 The
proposed project
could result in
the direct loss or
disturbance of
nesting birds
protected by the
MBTA, including
raptors (birds-of-
prey).
4.4-5(a) If construction is to occur between March 15 and August 30, the project applicant shall conduct a pre-construction breeding-season survey of the project site within 30 days of construction onset. Surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted within 1/4 mile of proposed ground disturbance. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any protected raptors are nesting on or directly adjacent to the project site. A nest survey for migratory birds shall be conducted within 500 feet of construction areas to determine if any migratory birds are nesting on or directly adjacent to the project site. The results of the survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. New surveys shall be conducted if construction of the surveyed area extends into the following season, unless all of the potential nesting trees have been removed.
A report shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln, following the completion of the bird nesting survey that includes, at a minimum, the following information:
i) A description of methodology including dates of field visits, the names of survey personnel with resumes, and a list of references cited and persons contacted.
ii) A map showing the location(s) of any protected raptor or migratory bird nests observed on the project site.
Applicant P,C DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-5(b) If the above survey does not identify any protected raptor or migratory bird nests on the project site, no further mitigation would be required. However, should any active nests be located on the project site, the project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all protected raptor and migratory bird nest sites located in the project site disturbance area(s) during the breeding season (approximately March 15 through August 30) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a non- disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing.
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
233
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
7 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.4-6 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
nesting
Swainson’s
hawk.
4.4-6(a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a Swainson’s hawk nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, extending out to ¼ mile. The survey shall be conducted during the nesting season of the same calendar year that construction is expected to begin, and prior to the issuance of any grading permits.
If
this survey does not identify any nesting Swainson’s hawk in the area within the project site that will be disturbed plus the ¼-mile radius, no further mitigation would be required.
Applicant P DSD
PSD
4.4-6(b) Should any active Swainson’s hawk nests be located within ¼ mile of the disturbance area, no intensive new disturbances (e.g. heavy equipment operation associated with construction, use of cranes or draglines, etc.) or other project- related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging, shall be initiated within the ¼ mile (buffer zone) of an active nest between March 1 - September 15 (or until August 15 if a Management Authorization or Biological Opinion is obtained for the project). The buffer zone should be increased to 1/2 mile in nesting areas away from urban development (i.e. in areas where disturbance [e.g. heavy equipment operation associated with construction, use of cranes or draglines, new rock crushing activities] is not a normal occurrence during the nesting season).
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-6(c) Nest trees should not be removed to the extent feasible. If a nest tree must be removed, a Management Authorization (including conditions to off-set the loss of the nest tree) must be obtained with the tree removal period specified in the Management Authorization, generally from October 1 to February 1. If construction or other project related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging are necessary within the buffer zone, then the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to monitor the nest site (to determine if the nest is abandoned).
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-6(d) If an active nest is abandoned and if the nestlings are still alive, the project sponsor shall fund the recovery and hacking (controlled release of captive reared young) of the nestling(s). Routine disturbances such as agricultural activities, commuter traffic, and routine facility maintenance activities within ¼ mile of an active nest shall not be prohibited.
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
234
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
8 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.4-7 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
burrowing owl
individuals
(eggs, nestlings
or juveniles).
4.4-7(a) The project applicant shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct both nesting and wintering season surveys for burrowing owl to determine if potential habitat within 500 feet of ground disturbance is used by this species. The timing and methodology for the surveys shall be based on the CDFG/Burrowing Owl Consortium Survey Guidelines and are detailed below. CDFG may require that these surveys be repeated annually if project construction is expected to span over two or more years.
Winter Season (December 1 through January 31)
• Four site visits on separate days, 2 hours before to 1 hour after sunset or 1 hour before to 2 hours after sunrise.
Nesting Season (February 1 to August 31)
• Four site visits on separate days, 2 hours before to 1 hour after sunset or 1 hour before to 2 hours after sunrise. At least two of the surveys shall be conducted during the peak nesting season between April 15 and July 15.
Applicant P DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-7(b) In addition to the wintering and nesting season surveys, pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by an experienced biologist within 30-days prior to the start of work activities where land conversions are planned in known or suitable habitat areas. If construction activities are delayed for more than 30 days after the preconstruction surveys, then a new preconstruction survey will be required. All surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the CDFG/Burrowing Owl Consortium survey protocols (Burrowing Owl Consortium, 1993).
Applicant P DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-7(c) If burrowing owls are discovered in the programmatic portions of the project site, the project applicant shall notify the City and CDFG. A qualified biologist shall implement a routine monitoring program and establish a fenced exclusion zone around each occupied burrow. No construction activities shall be allowed within the exclusion zone until such time that the burrows are determined to be unoccupied.
The buffer zones shall be a minimum of 150 feet from an occupied burrow during the non- breeding season (September 1 through January 31), and a minimum of 250 feet from an occupied burrow during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31).
Applicant P,C DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-7(d) The project applicant shall provide appropriate mitigation for project related effects on burrowing owl in consultation with CDFG. Mitigation can be conducted either onsite, or at an off-site location that is approved by the CDFG. Preference is for onsite within open space areas, if possible.
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG 235
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
9 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.4-7 (continued) 4.4-7(e) The CDFG shall be consulted regarding the implementation of avoidance or passive relocation methods. All activities that will result in a disturbance to burrows shall be approved by CDFG prior to implementation.
Applicant C DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-8 The
proposed project
could result in
the loss of
foraging habitat
for Swainson’s
hawk, white tailed
kite, burrowing
owl and other
raptors.
4.4-8 The project applicant shall preserve annual grasslands or other suitable raptor foraging habitat at a ratio of 0.75 to 1.0 (as approved by the City and CDFG). Preservation may occur through either:
• Payment of a mitigation fee to the City of Lincoln through a negotiated agreement between the City, the project applicant, and CDFG. The monies would be held in a trust fund, and used to preserve mitigation land through the purchase, monitoring, maintenance, and remediation of lands that supports suitable foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk. (consistent with CDFG guidelines); or
• Purchase of conservation easements or fee title to suitable Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat to protect the habitat from urban development; or • If adopted prior to issuance of the first grading permit for the proposed project, the project applicant may mitigate this impact through participation in the Placer County Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan. If the plan is adopted prior to construction of a future phase, the project applicant may mitigate this impact through participation in the plan.
Applicant G DSD
PSD
CDFG
4.4-10 The
proposed project
could result in
loss of nesting
habitat for tri-
colored blackbird
and black rail.
4.4-10(a) For portions of the project where the onset of construction occurs between April 1 and August 31, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre- construction nesting surveys for tri-colored blackbird colonies and black rail within the disturbance areas on the project site. The survey shall be conducted no more than 30 days from the onset of construction. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be re-surveyed. If the survey does not identify any colonies of nesting tricolor blackbirds or black rail on the project site, no further mitigation would be required.
Applicant P DSD
PSD
236
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.4-10(b) Should any active tricolor blackbird colonies or black rail be found nesting on the project site, the project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG,
shall avoid all active nest sites located in the project site during the breeding season while the nest site is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction to avoid the nesting season or establishing a buffer around the nest site. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site.
The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG, and will be, at a minimum, 250 feet. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used.
Applicant C DSD
PSD
4.4-14 The
proposed project
could result in
loss of protected
oak trees and
oak woodlands.
4.4-14 Implement the Village 1 Specific Plan Oak Woodland Mitigation and Management Plan.
Applicant I DSD PSD
4.5 Cultural Resources
4.5-1 The
proposed project
could damage or
destroy known
historic-period
resources.
4.5-1(a) As part of the subsequent CEQA review for any small lot tentative map, or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a small lot tentative map, within the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan, the project applicant shall hire a professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Historic Architecture to perform the following:
i) conduct an historical architectural survey for areas that have not been subject to comprehensive investigation meeting professional standards. ii) identify and evaluate the historic-period resources identified in the cultural resource investigation for the property subject to the grading permit and/or improvement plans. Resources that have been identified to date, but not evaluated, include P-31-0965, P-31-1679-H, P-31-1680, P-31-1682, P-31- Applicant P DSD
237
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
11 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.5-1
(continued)
1683, P-31-1684, P-31-1686, P-31-1687, P-31-1688, P-31-1689, P-31- 1691- H, P-31-1695, P-31-1696, P-31-1698-H, P-31-1708, P-31-1710, P- 31-1719, P-31-1721, P-31-1723, P-31-2611-H, and P-31-2612-H.
If none of the identified historic resources within the property subject to the grading permit and/or improvement plans are found to be eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR, no further action is required. 4.5-1(b) A design plan shall be prepared by a professional meeting Secretary of Interior standards for all resources found to be eligible for listing pursuant to Mitigation Measure 4.5-1(a).
The design plan shall incorporate methods determined appropriate and feasible by the historic architecture professional in coordination with the City of Lincoln.
Methods to reduce impacts on historic-period resources shall include, but not be limited to,
i) If feasible, the resources shall be preserved in place, and, as appropriate, incorporated into parks and open
space/corridors;
ii) If it is not feasible to preserve the resource in place, it shall be recorded pursuant to Secretary of Interior standards, and architectural features and/or artifacts shall be made available to an appropriate museum and/or historical organization; If the significant historical resource is retained and reused, all rehabilitation, renovation, and additions shall meet Secretary of Interior standards to the extent feasible;
iii) Project development to adjacent to significant historical resources that are to be retained shall be designed to be in character with the historic setting of the resources, consistent with Secretary of Interior standards; iv) Commemorative markers and interpretive exhibits shall be used to educate the public about the history of the plan area. The content of the commemorative markers and interpretive exhibits could include subjects such as mining, ranching, and Native American activities in the plan area. Markers and exhibits shall be prepared by a historic architecture professional or equally qualified professional.
238
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
12 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.5-2 The
proposed project
could damage or
destroy identified
archaeological
resources.
4.5-2a) As part of the subsequent CEQA review for any small lot tentative map, or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a small lot tentative map, in the unsurveyed portion of Phase 1 (APN’s 021-272-012 and 021-272-013) and the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan that has not been subject to comprehensive investigation for the identification of Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs), the project applicant shall submit to the City a draft cultural resources report that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for all previously unsurveyed portions of the project site. The City shall consult with the California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area prior to completion of the draft report.
Upon receipt of a discretionary entitlement application (e.g., small lot tentative map), or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a discretionary entitlement, the City shall notify California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area who have requested notification pursuant to AB 52. The City shall request that the tribe(s) identify portions of the project site that could be sensitive or potentially sensitive for tribal cultural resources (TCRs) and evaluate any TCRs that the Tribe determines to be present. If requested by the Tribe(s), information regarding known sites and areas within the project boundaries that are potentially sensitive for TCRs shall be provided to the Tribe(s), and, if requested, a site visit will be conducted with tribal representatives.
Applicant A,P,G DSD
239
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
13 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.5-2 (continued) The notification will contain the following:
• A request to consult, pursuant to AB52.
• A written description of the type of proposed ground disturbance, location and boundaries.
• A description of the activities (e.g., HDD, trenching, etc.). • A map of the project area at a sufficient scale to indicate the spatial extent of activities.
• A detailed description of the depth of excavation.
The draft cultural resources report will be provided to the tribe(s) with the notification. The final cultural resources report will incorporate the findings of the Tribe. If a tribe does not respond to the City’s notice within 30 days, it will be assumed that they are not aware of any TCRs within the project site.
If the Tribe identifies one or more areas within the project site that could be sensitive for TCRs, and the potentially sensitive site is in an area that would be disturbed by project construction, all necessary measures to avoid and protect the site shall be considered, and a Treatment Plan shall be prepared in consultation with the Tribe prior to any disturbance of the potential TCR site. The Treatment Plan shall include identification methods, including but not limited to, where appropriate, canine forensic surveys, ground penetrating radar, or vegetation clearing for better visibility.
If the identified site is a tribal cultural resource, the project shall be designed to avoid the resource, if feasible. If there are resources that cannot be avoided, the City, shall consult with the geographically and culturally affiliated tribe(s) regarding the protection measures that are proposed to be implemented. These protection measures will be written in clear, enforceable language. The City shall provide the tribe(s) the opportunity to submit comments and participate in consultation to resolve issues of concern. The project proponent shall not implement the treatment until the tribe approves protection measures, or if agreement cannot be reached after a good-faith effort, the City determines that any or all feasible measures have been implemented, where feasible, and the resource is either avoided or protected.
240
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
14 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.5-2 (continued) 4.5-2(b) As part of the subsequent CEQA review, including AB 52 consultation where applicable, for any small lot tentative map, or grading or improvement plans for projects that do not require a small lot tentative map, the consulting Tribe(s) shall evaluate the resources identified as P-31-1678, P-31-1681, P-31-1688, P-31- 1690, P-31-1693, P-31-1694, P-31-1696, P-31-1699, P-31-1700, P-31-1718, P- 31-1720, P-31-1722, P-31-1724, P-31-1725, P-31-1726, P-31-1729, P-31-1730, P-31-1731, P-31-1732, P-31-1733, P-31-1734, P-31-1735, and P-31-1737, as well as any
unrecorded TCRs, sacred lands, Tribal Cultural Landscapes, or areas of tribal cultural or religious significance. For any site that qualifies as a TCR, historical resource or unique archaeological resource, mitigation of impacts on the resource shall follow standard professional procedures, including, but not limited to, avoidance, protection, written and photographic documentation, or other measures identified in California Public Resources Code section 21083.2, or in consultation with Tribes as described in (a), above.
Applicant,
DSD
A, P,G DSD
4.5-3 The
proposed project
could cause a
substantial
adverse change
in the
significance of
previously
undiscovered
prehistoric or
historic-period
archaeological
resources.
4.5-3a) Construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of buried cultural resources anywhere within the project site and the protocol to be followed if a tribal cultural resource is encountered. Prior to the onset of grading, the project applicant shall distribute a cultural resources handbook that explains the procedures to follow if cultural resources and human remains are encountered, provide a list of important contact information and phone numbers, and include written descriptions and photographic examples (where possible) of cultural resources. The project applicant may shall also hire a certified Tribal Monitor to conduct a pre-construction training of all construction personnel involved in grading and excavation activity. If the area has been previously determined to be culturally sensitive, the project proponent shall hire a certified tribal monitor to observe all initial ground disturbing activities (e.g., initial grading and trenching in areas not previously graded) in the area determined to be culturally sensitive.
Additional monitoring of ground disturbing activities may be required, based on the sensitivity of the area.
Applicant C DSD
241
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
15 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.3-5 (continued) 4.5-3(b) In the event that any previously unidentified subsurface archaeological or Tribal Cultural resources are discovered during construction-related earth-moving activities, all ground-disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the City of Lincoln (the City) shall be notified. The City shall consult with the consulting Tribe(s) to assess the significance of the find. If the find is determined to be significant by the Tribe(s) (i.e., because the find is determined to constitute either an historical resource, unique archaeological resource and/or a tribal cultural resource), then representatives of the City, the geographically and culturally affiliated tribal representative (for prehistoric and tribal cultural resources) and the qualified archaeologist and consulting tribe(s) shall meet to determine the
appropriate course of action, with the City making the final decision. All significant cultural materials that cannot avoided in place shall be collected by the Tribal Monitor and stored in a secure location on site, such as a lock box or conex. All materials shall be reburied in an area that is predetermined to not have future ground disturbing activities. This area shall be recorded using GPS by the consulting Tribe and the location kept confidential in the tribal database.
Applicant,
DSD
C DSD
242
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
16 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.5-3(c) If the consulting Tribe(s) determines that some or all of the affected property qualifies as a Tribal Cultural Landscape, including a Native American sanctified cemetery, place of worship, religious or ceremonial site, or sacred shrine (Public Resources Code section 5097.9) or a Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources pursuant to Public Resources Code §5024.1, including any historic or prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, any archaeological or historic site (Public Resources Code Section 5097.993), the archaeologist, in consultation with the tribe, shall recommend to the City potentially feasible mitigation measures that would preserve the integrity of the site or minimize impacts to it, including any or a combination of the following:
i. Avoidance, preservation, and/or enhancement of all or a portion of the Tribal Cultural Landscape as open space or habitat, with a conservation easement dedicated to the most interested and appropriate tribal organization, if such an organization is willing to accept and maintain such an easement, or alternatively, a cultural resource organization that holds conservation easements;
ii. An agreement with any such tribal or cultural resource organization to maintain the confidentiality of the location of the site so as to minimize the danger of vandalism to the site or other damage to its integrity; or iii. Other measures, short of full or partial avoidance or preservation, intended to minimize impacts to the Native American Cultural Place consistent with land use assumptions and the proposed design and footprint of the development project for which the requested grading permit has been
approved.
Applicant C DSD
4.5-3(d) After receiving such recommendations, the City shall assess the feasibility of the recommendations and impose the most protective mitigation feasible. In reaching conclusions with respect to these recommendations, the City shall consult with both
the project applicant and the geographically and culturally affiliated Tribe(s) engaged in AB52 consultation with the City.
City C DSD
4.5-3(e) Implement Mitigation Measure 4.5-4, in the event human remains are discovered. See Measure 4.5-4 243
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
17 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.5-4 The
proposed project
could disturb
human remains.
4.5-4 If human remains are discovered at any project construction sites during any phase of construction, all ground-disturbing activity within 50 feet of the remains shall be halted immediately, and the City of Lincoln (the City) and the Placer County coroner shall be notified immediately. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project applicant shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The City shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of state law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The project applicant shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by the City, before the resumption of ground-disturbing activities within 50 feet of where the remains were discovered.
Applicant/City C DSD
4.5-5 The
proposed project
could directly or
indirectly destroy
unique
paleontological
resources.
4.5-5(a) Construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of discovering fossils anywhere within the project site, but primarily in the western part of Phase 1, and the protocol to be followed if a fossil is encountered. This information shall be included in the “cultural resources handbook” prepared under Mitigation Measure
4.5-3. It shall describe procedures to follow if fossils are encountered, provide a list of important contact information and phone numbers, and include written descriptions and photographic examples (where possible) of the fossils. The project applicant may also hire a professional who meets the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards to conduct a pre-construction training of all construction personnel involved in grading and excavation activity.
Applicant/City C DSD
4.5-5(b) In the event that paleontological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities, ground-disturbing activity within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted until the project applicant hires a qualified paleontologist to examine the resources and assess its significance. If the resource is determined to be significant, representatives of the City of Lincoln (the City) and the qualified paleontologist shall determine the appropriate course of action (i.e., any additional exploratory measures deemed necessary for the further evaluation of and/or mitigation of adverse impacts to the resources), with the City making the final decision. All significant paleontological resources recovered shall be subject to scientific analysis Applicant/City C DSD
244
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
18 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
and professional curation; a report of these activities shall be prepared for the City by the paleontologist according to current professional standards.
4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change
4.6-1 The
proposed project
would generate
greenhouse gas
emissions, either
directly or
indirectly, that
would contribute
to global climate
change.
4.6-1(a) An Energy Conservation Plan for all commercial and residential development shall be required prior to recordation of the first small lot Final Map. The plan shall describe the techniques and programs to be employed in the development of the project to achieve a minimum 15 percent energy efficiency above that required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations, or compliance with the then- current Title 24 energy efficiency regulations. These programs shall include one or more of the following, or equally effective measures:
Participation in the PG&E Energy Star Performance Method. This method is available to builders of single-family and multi-family homes that are at least 15 percent more energy efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications. Participating builders become part of the California Energy Star New Homes Program, and their homes earn the Energy Star label. Incremental incentives can also be earned by adding energy efficient appliances and/or lighting to homes. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include all energy efficiency features to be incorporated into the project.
OR
Participation in the New Solar Homes Partnership (NSHP) Performance Method.
This method is available to builders of single-family homes that are at least 15 percent more efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications.
Prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit, the floor plans and exterior elevations submitted in conjunction with the Building Permit application, shall show that the applicant has installed the appropriate number of solar panels or Photovoltaic roofing tiles throughout the project (described as lot numbers, locations, and/or building numbers and locations) to offset that development’s share of the 7,599,510 kwh/year total Plan’s onsite renewable energy offsets.
OR
Participation in the Build It Green Program, which was created by Build It Green, a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote health, durable, energy and resource efficient buildings throughout California. Using the Green Point Checklist,
a home can be considered green if it fulfills the prerequisites and earns at least 50 points and meets the minimum points per category: Energy (30 points); Indoor Air Applicant I DSD
245
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
19 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.6-1 (continued) Quality (5 points); Resources (6 points); and Water (9 points). Build It Green uses certified Green Point Raters to measure success with the program and verification of the measures employed to meet the requirements of the checklist. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include a completed copy of the Green Point Checklist.
4.6-1(b) The project applicant shall be responsible for having prepared, by an experienced and qualified firm, an Energy Resource Conservation Guide that will provide educational information on how homeowners can increase energy efficiency and conservation in their new homes. The information will be delivered to each original homeowner as part of the move-in package. The information packet shall be reviewed by, and be subject to approval of, City of Lincoln staff. A copy of the Energy Resource Conservation Guide shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the completion of construction activities, and finalized before occupancy.
Applicant O DSD
4.6-1(c) Light Emitting Diode (LED) traffic signals and LED street lights, or more energy- efficient signals and streetlights, shall be installed in accordance with City improvement standards or as otherwise approved by the Development Services Director.
Applicant G DSD
4.6-1(d) The project applicant shall prepare a tree planting program to guide the planting of shade trees within residential lots and along streets in a manner that reduces radiant heat. Commercial and retail parking lots shall be planted with shade trees that will produce 50% coverage within 15 years. Landscape Plans submitted for Design Review shall include a copy of the tree planting program.
Applicant G DSD
4.6-1(e) A tree information planting and care guide shall be delivered to each original homeowner as a part of the move in package. If the guide is prepared by someone other than the City, it shall be reviewed by, and be subject to the approval of, City of Lincoln staff. . A copy of the tree information planting and care guide shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the completion of construction activities, and finalized before occupancy.
Applicant O DSD
4.6-1(f) Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be installed as part of the original construction of residential and commercial structures. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include documentation of the energy efficient lighting fixtures to be used.
Applicant B DSD
4.6-1(g) New commercial buildings shall be 15 percent more energy efficient than the 2008 Title 24 building standards based on annual energy usage requirements, or comply with the then-current Title 24 energy efficiency regulations. Plans submitted for Design Review shall include all energy efficiency features to be incorporated into the project.
Applicant B DSD
246
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
20 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.6-1 (continued) 4.6-1(h) Prior to approval of Improvement Plans, the applicant shall show that the roadway system shall be designed to accommodate the usage of neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs).
Applicant G DSD, PSD
4.6-1(i) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, Improvement Plans, or Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that bus turnouts and transit shelters shall be placed on roadways that are to be served by future bus transit in accordance with City improvement standards and as otherwise directed by City’s Development Services Director.
Applicant G DSD, PSD
4.6-1(j) Implement Mitigation Measure 4.3-2. See MM 4.3-2
4.7 Hazardous Materials
4.7-2 The
proposed project
could occur in
locations where
historic land uses
are known to
have resulted in
soil or
groundwater
contamination or
may have the
potential to have
caused soil or
groundwater
contamination.
4.7-2(a) Prior to approval of any Tentative Map and/or a specific development permit, the applicant shall submit a Phase I ESA that has been prepared in accordance with the most current ASTM 1527 standard. If the results of the Phase I ESA indicate no recognized environmental conditions, no further action is required. However, the City shall ensure Improvement Plans and/or grading permits include the requirements of Mitigation Measure 4.7-2(b) pertaining to the discovery of previously unidentified conditions or hazards. No Phase I ESA is necessary for the
Walkup Ranch property because one has already been prepared.
Applicant I DSD
4.7-2(b) For any specific development location for which the Phase I ESA completed in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.7-2(a) identifies recommendations for further investigation and/or remediation, prior to issuance of a grading permit for the affected location, the City shall ensure the recommendations are implemented to the satisfaction of PCDEHS. If contaminants are present at levels that could pose a human health or environmental risk that would be immediately dangerous to life and health, no soil disturbance shall be permitted until the location has been remediated to the satisfaction of PCDEHS. If contaminants are present at levels that do not pose an immediate threat, construction activities may proceed provided a Soil Management Plan and Health and Safety Plan prepared by a qualified professional have been submitted to and approved by PCDEHS. The City shall also ensure Improvement Plans and/or grading permits include the requirements of this Mitigation Measure 4.7-2(b) pertaining to the discovery of previously unidentified conditions or hazards. If previously unidentified contamination is discovered in the former Titan missile facility or gun range parcels (PA 15 and PA 66) (parcel numbers are based on the August 2011 Specific Plan), the City shall immediately notify CVRWQCB. Work in those areas shall not resume until approved by CVRWQCB.
Applicant P,G DSD
PCDEHS
CVRWQB
247
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
21 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
4.8-1 The
proposed project
would increase
the amount of
impervious
surfaces and
alter drainage
patterns, which
could increase
the potential for
localized and
downstream
flooding.
4.8-1(a) i) Project applicant(s) shall ensure that planned improvements to the SR 193 bridge are operational prior to receiving a grading permit for development in the programmatic portion (beginning with Phase 2).
OR
ii) If SR 193 bridge improvements are not completed prior to receiving a grading permit for areas within the Auburn Ravine watershed, beginning with Phase 2, the applicant(s) shall provide on-site detention and/or retention to mitigate increases in water surface elevation (WSE) if the results of modeling show a 0.05-foot increase or greater in WSE, or if peak flow rates increase by 1 percent or more within project boundary or downstream of the SR 193 bridge.
AND
iii) Project applicant(s) shall provide for peak flow mitigation as defined in Village 1 Specific Plan, City of Lincoln, CA, Drainage Master Plan Table II.F.1B for the programmatic portion in order to mitigate potential on-site flooding from increased peak flows associated with development of the projects. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, project applicants shall demonstrate that provisions for peak flow mitigation in the preliminary grading plan, as defined in Village 1 Specific Plan, City of Lincoln, CA, Drainage Master Plan Table II.F.1B and Tables III.A.3A to III.A.3F, as applicable for the project. The City Engineer shall review plans for compliance with the applicable portions of Table II.F.1B and Tables III.A.3A to III.A.3F, as applicable, prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to issuing a building permit for any project in the Village 1 Specific Plan, overbank excavation and stabilization of channels that will receive runoff from the area(s) to be developed shall be completed. The City Engineer shall confirm that peak flow mitigation has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans.
iv) The project applicant for projects within the programmatic portion of the project site shall prohibit development of structures within the modeled floodplains of North and South Ingram Slough as identified in the Village 1 Specific Plan, City of Lincoln, CA, Drainage Master Plan Post-Project 100-Year Floodplain Alt. 193 Fix figures.
Applicant G PSD
DSD
248
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
22 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.8-2 The
proposed project
would increase
stormwater
volumes in
Auburn Ravine,
Ingram Slough,
Orchard Creek,
and ultimately the
Natomas Cross
Canal.
4.8-2 (continued)
4.8-2(a) Prior to approval of the first final map, the Applicant shall identify 87.1 acre-feet of storage capacity in the watershed to accommodate increased stormwater runoff volumes associated with the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan.
Storage capacity may be incorporated into on-site design, obtained at the approved
LFVMF, if operational at the time of development, or at a location approved by or acceptable to the City.
The Applicant shall be required to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, and maintenance of the LFVMF to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Village 1 Specific Plan. For capital improvements, funding shall be through the City’s existing PFE program. Fees for operation and maintenance shall be through an assessment district established during the Final Map processing. Fees shall be paid in conjunction with issuance of
building permits. If, at the time the first final map is submitted for approval, the regional facilities are not available or operational, or if additional capacity is required, the Applicant shall incorporate in to the final design sufficient on-site storage capacity, or a combination of on-site and off-site capacity, to fully mitigate the 87.1 acre-feet.
If off-site facilities are used, the Applicant shall be required to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, maintenance, and management of the regional retention facilities to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Village1 Specific Plan. Assuming the regional facility has been constructed, Applicant shall pay the appropriate fees.
Applicant I PSD
DSD
4.8-4 The
proposed project
would increase
the types and
amounts of
pollutants in
stormwater
runoff
that could be
discharged to
Ingram Slough
and its tributaries
and Auburn
Ravine, which
could degrade
water quality.
4.8-4 Low Impact Development BMPs. Project Conditions of Approval shall specify that appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) be incorporated into project design prior to approval of final grading/improvement plan(s) to reduce urban pollutants in runoff, consistent with goals and standards established under federal and State
non-point source discharge NPDES regulations and Basin Plan water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance No. 826B, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan.
The proposed water quality facilities shall be identified and designed in a Water Quality Management Plan prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.40 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. All water quality facilities identified in the Water Quality Management Plan shall be constructed with the installation of the Applicant G PSD
DSD
249
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
23 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.8-4 (continued) infrastructure.
The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all non-structural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs. Non- structural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping.
The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities. The City shall formally adopt and implement a funding mechanism specifically to fund the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities as proposed by the Stormwater Management Plan.
The project Applicant shall submit a site-specific BMP plan showing the on-site locations and effectiveness of the BMP facilities proposed for long-term water quality impact reduction prior to project approval. The plan shall include a method or methods for financing the long-term maintenance of the proposed site-specific facilities.
All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions (or other similar source approved by the City) for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the PCFCWCD and City standards and shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs.
To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities.
Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment,
250
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
24 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. The Applicant shall verify that proposed BMPs are appropriate to treat the pollutants of concern from the proposed project and shall provide for the establishment of vegetation, where specified, by means of proper irrigation, for effective performance of BMPs. Maintenance of these facilities shall be provided by the City. Prior to project approval or Final Map approval, easements shall be created and offered for dedication to the City for maintenance and access to these facilities in anticipation of possible City maintenance. No waterquality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.
4.9 Land Use
4.9-1 The
proposed project
could result in
internal land use
incompatibilities.
4.9-1(a) Implement Mitigation Measures 4.1-3(a) and 4.10 3.
Applicant
B
DSD
4.9-1(b) When occupied residences would be located adjacent to active agricultural operations, including livestock grazing and/or confinement, the applicant shall provide to those home buyers information about the agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities occurring on lands adjacent to the project site, including a copy of Placer County’s Right-to-Farm Ordinance. Residential development located next to active agricultural areas shall have a notice included in the deed notifying buyers of the agricultural use.
City O DSD
4.10 Noise
4.10-1 The
proposed project
would increase
traffic noise
levels at existing
noise- sensitive
land uses in the
project vicinity.
4.10-1(a) The City shall work with Placer County and the Town of Loomis when Sierra College Boulevard is widened to four lanes from Taylor Road to Twelve Bridges Drive to encourage the use of rubber asphalt or an equally effective noise-suppressing surface.
City When
SCB
planned for
widening
DSD
251
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
25 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.10-1(b) The City shall coordinate with Caltrans and/or South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA) when SR 193 is widened to four lanes from west of Sierra College Boulevard to encourage the use of rubber asphalt or an equally effective noise-suppressing surface.
City When SR
193
plann
ed for
widen
ing
DSD
4.10-1(c) An acoustical analysis shall be prepared during design of the Oak Tree Lane extension which shall identify mitigation measures to ensure outdoor activity areas of nearby residences do not exceed 60 dB Ldn and indoor areas do not exceed 45 dB Ldn. The construction of Oak Tree Lane shall include one of more of the following measures as necessary to ensure that outdoor activity areas of nearby residents do not exceed 60 dB Ldn and indoor areas do not exceed 45 dB Ldn: increasing the distance of the road from the residences, berms, walls or a combination of such features and/or use of rubberized asphalt or similar materials.
City During
desig
n of
Oak
Tree
Lane
exten
sion
DSD
4.10-2 The
proposed project
would expose
noise-sensitive
land uses to
construction
noise.
4.10-2(a) Construction hours shall be limited to 7am to 7pm, Monday through Friday (unless extended by special permit).
4.10-2(b) All internal combustion engines associated with stationary and mobile construction equipment shall have adequate mufflers equal to or better than those supplied with the equipment by the manufacturer.
4.10-2(c) Onsite construction staging areas shall be located as far as practical from existing residential areas.
4.10-2(d) Advance notice shall be provided to all residences located within 300 feet of extensive compaction activities, including the approximate start date and duration of such compaction activities.
Applicant C PSD, DSD
252
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
26 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.10-4 The
proposed
project would
contribute to
cumulative
increases in
traffic noise
levels.
4.10-4 The City shall coordinate with Caltrans and/or South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA) when Sierra College Boulevard is widened to four lanes south of SR 193 to encourage the use of rubber asphalt or an equally effective noise-suppressing surface.
City When
SCB
planned
for
widening
DSD
4.10-5 The
proposed project
could expose
future noise-
sensitive land
uses within the
Village 1 Specific
Plan area to
elevated traffic
noise levels.
4.10-5(a) Any residential development proposed within the 60-65 dB Ldn contour distances of Table 4.10-12, as measured from roadway centerline, shall include one of the following measures to ensure traffic noise does not exceed acceptable limits at the exterior and interior spaces of the residences:
i) The setback from the roadway shall be increased to locate the primary outdoor activity area beyond the 60 dB Ldn contour.
OR
ii) The primary outdoor activity areas shall be located on portions of the property that are shielded from view of the roadway(s).
OR
iii) Noise barriers shall be constructed of sufficient height to intercept line of sight between the primary outdoor activity areas and roadway(s) in question. Such barriers could take the form of earthen berms, solid walls, or a combination of the two.
OR
iv) The residential structures shall be located between the primary outdoor activity area and subject roadway(s).
Applicant G DSD
4.10-5(b) Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation shall be provided to allow occupants to close doors and windows as desired for acoustical isolation from elevated traffic noise levels.
Applicant B DSD
253
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
27 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.10-5(c) Any residential development proposed within the 65-70 dB Ldn contour distances of Table 4.10-12, as measured from roadway centerline, shall include all of the following measures in addition to those specified in MM 4.10-5(b) to ensure traffic noise does not exceed acceptable limits at the exterior and interior spaces of the residences:
i) Noise barriers shall be designed of sufficient height to reduce exterior noise levels to 60 dB Ldn or less in primary outdoor activity areas.
AND
ii) All windows and sliding glass doors from which the subject roadways are visible shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of
32. AND
iii) Exterior wall construction shall be stucco siding, or wood siding with a 3/4 inch shear under-layer, or the acoustic equivalent.
AND
iv) All exterior wall cavities shall be fully insulated.
Applicant G, B DSD
4.12 Public Services
4.12-7 The
proposed project
would generate
demand for park
and recreation
facilities.
4.12-7 The project applicant shall pay all applicable fair-share fees to the City pursuant to the established Park In-Lieu Fee Program and the applicable Public Facilities Element fees program to fund the provision of recreational facilities to meet demands created by Phase 1 development.
Applicant B DSD
4.13 Public Utilities
4.13-1 The
proposed project
would increase
the demand for
water supplies.
4.13-1(a) Prior to recordation of each Final Map for each subsequent project, the City of Lincoln shall obtain necessary entitlements demonstrating there will be adequate water supply to serve the portion of the proposed project defined on the Final Map, in accordance with Government Code Section 66473.7(a)(1) – SB 221 Written Verification of Water Supply. The commitment for service will require execution of a service order agreement, and the City shall collect necessary fees at the time of building permit issuance.
Applicant I DSD, PSD
254
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
28 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.13-1(b) Prior to the approval of the 1,200th connection to the City’s water system or a demand of 1,500 gpm within Village 1 and/or Village 2, whichever occurs first, the City shall ensure the following four improvements, or equally effective improvements for distribution, have been completed and are operational:
i) new 30-inch pipeline, to be owned by PCWA, connecting the 42-inch pipeline in the Catta Verdera 5 MG storage tank area to the City Pond Area, ii) new PCWA-owned metering station at the City Pond site, similar to the existing PCWA metering station at the Catta Verdera 5 MG tank site, to provide surface water deliveries to the City from the new 30-inch PCWA pipeline, iii) City-owned 16-inch high pressure pipeline to supply portions of the Catta Verdera development by gravity from the new PCWA metering station at the City Pond site so the current City booster pumping station serving the area can be placed on standby,
iv) City-owned 36-inch pipeline that will connect the new PCWA metering station to the existing 24-inch pipeline in Twelve Bridges Drive and the existing 30- inch pipeline to supply the Reservoir 1 tank sites from the new PCWA metering station.
City Prior to
1,200th
connection
DSD
4.13-1(c) Prior to the cessation of the 2004 Temporary Agreement, the City shall provide for its fair share funding of the design and construction of Phase 1 of the NID RWSP 10-mgd treatment facility and associated storage and transmission facilities.
Funding shall be timed to ensure that water from the RWSP will be available at the point at which PCWA no longer treats and conveys NID water under the 2004 Temporary Agreement.
City Prior to
cessation
of
temporary
agreement
4.13-2 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
demand for
treated water
supplies and
distribution.
4.13-2 Implement Mitigation Measure 4.13-1(b) and (c). See MM 4.13-1(b) 255
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
29 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.13-5 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
wastewater
generation
requiring
conveyance to
and treatment at
the WWTRF.
4.13-5 Prior to approval of the first Final Small Lot Map for the first planning area developed in the programmatic portion of the Village 1 Specific Plan, the City shall ensure the planned expansion of the WWTRF provides adequate capacity to accommodate flows from the programmatic portion of the project site. The project applicants shall pay fair-share cost of required fees to fund the expansion of the WWTRF.
City I DSD
4.13-8 The
proposed project
would use energy
for
construction and
operation.
4.13-8 Implement Mitigation Measures 4.3-1, 4.3-2, 4.6-1, and 4.13-12. See MMs 4.3-1, 4.3-2, 4.6-1 and 4.13-12
4.13-12 Construc
tion of the
proposed project
would generate
demolition waste
and construction
debris.
4.13-12 Prior to issuance of building permits for each individual project, project applicants shall prepare a waste management plan to divert at least 50 percent of the construction materials generated during construction of the particular project to ensure compliance with CALGreen requirements.
Applicant G DSD
4.14 Transportation and Circulation
4.14-1 The
proposed project
4.14-1 The City shall construct the following improvements prior to the service level degrading to LOS D and/or when signal warrants are met. These improvements
City in
accordanc
DSD, PSD
256
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
30 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
would increase
traffic at
intersections
within the City of
Lincoln.
shall be incorporated into the City’s PFE fee program or other appropriate fee program. If there are not enough funds to construct the improvements when they are needed, then the applicant shall provide the necessary funding, subject to reimbursement as PFE fees are collected from City development projects. a) Signalize the intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road and Ingram Parkway or widen Ferrari Ranch Road to four through lanes when the LOS approaches D and/or signal warrants are met.
b) Signalize the intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road and Sun City Boulevard or, for Phase 1 only, widen Ferrari Ranch Road to four lanes when the LOS approaches D and/or signal warrants are met.
e with
mitigation
4.14-1(c) Signalize the intersection of Twelve Bridges Drive and Sierra College Boulevard when the LOS approaches D and/or signal warrants are met.
City When
signal
warrants
met
DSD
4.14-3 The
proposed project
would increase
traffic on
roadways
outside the City
of Lincoln.
4.14-3 If and when the Town of Loomis becomes a participant in SPRTA and/or the City and the Town enter into a reciprocal agreement for payment of fees to offset traffic impacts, the proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward the widening of Sierra College Boulevard to four lanes from the Town of Loomis limits to Taylor Road.
City, Loomis If and
when
Loomis
joins
SPARTA
and/or
enters
agreement
with the
City of
Lincoln
DSD
4.14-4 The
proposed project
would increase
traffic on impact
a.m. and p.m.
peak hour level
of service on
freeways under
Existing Plus
Project
conditions.
4.14-4 The City shall work with Caltrans on the timing of an additional mainline lane is constructed on SR 65 northbound between I-80 and Galleria Boulevard.
City, Caltrans O PSD
257
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
31 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.14-7 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
traffic at
intersections
outside the City
of Lincoln.
4.14-7(a) The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward restriping to create a separate westbound right turn lane and northbound acceleration lane at the intersection of Sierra College Boulevard & English Colony Way (2030 and 2050).
Applicant Payment
of
SPARTA
fees
DSD
4.14-7(b) If and when the Town of Loomis becomes a participant in SPRTA and/or the City and the Town enter into a reciprocal agreement for payment of fees to offset traffic impacts, the proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward restriping to create a second southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Sierra College Boulevard & King Road (2030 and 2050).
Applicant If and
when
Loomis
joins
SPARTA
and/or
enters
agreement
with the
City of
Lincoln
DSD, PSD
4.14-7(c) The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward eliminating southbound U- turns on Wildcat Boulevard and providing a right turn “overlap” signal phase on westbound West Stanford Ranch Road (2030).
Applicant If and
when the
cities of
Rocklin
and
Lincoln
enter
agreement
DSD, PSD
4.14-7(d) The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward providing a second eastbound left turn lane on Ranch View Drive at its intersection with Wildcat Boulevard (2030).
Applicant If and
when the
cities of
Rocklin
and
Lincoln
enter
agreement
DSD, PSD
258
Exhibit B
Mitigation Monitoring Program
32 Village 1 Specific Plan: Stardust 12 Project
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN – STARDUST 12 PROJECT
March 2026
Impact
Mitigation Measures – Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing/
Milestone
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
4.14-8 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
traffic on local
roadways
outside the City
of Lincoln.
4.14-8 The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward the widening of Sierra College Boulevard to 6 lanes if and when this improvement is included in the SPRTA fee program. (2030 and 2050).
Applicant If and
when
improve-
ment is
included in
SPARTA
fee
DSD, PSD
4.14-9 The
proposed project
would contribute
to cumulative
increases in
traffic levels on
freeways.
4.14-9 The proposed project shall contribute its fair share toward the construction of an auxiliary lane on SR 65 Bypass Southbound from Ferrari Ranch Road to Lincoln Boulevard if and when the improvement is added to the SPRTA fee program and/or an agreement for collection of such fees is entered into by the City and Caltrans. (2030)
Applicant If and
when
improve-
ment is
included in
SPARTA
fee
DSD, PSD
Abbreviations
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department I = Prior to Construction Drawing Approval G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit Approval
P = Pre-Construction/Grading
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFG = California Department of Fish and Game
PCDEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
259
Resolution No. 2026-
RESOLUTION 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE STARDUST 12 PROJECT (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 021-274-038-000 AND 021-274-039-000) (APPLICANT: JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC / PROPERTY OWNER: JAMES B. GUERTIN)
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65450 et seq provides for preparation and adoption of Specific Plans by general law cities; and
WHEREAS, Title 18, Chapter 18 92 of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review and recommendation by the City of Lincoln City Council on all proposed Village 1 Specific Plan amendments to the text of land use and zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the Village 1 Specific Plan was approved on November 27, 2012 by Resolution No. 2012-197; and
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2012, the City Council of the City of Lincoln certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Village 1 Specific Plan (SCH # 2010102018), which analyzed the environmental impacts of development within the 1,832 -acre Specific Plan project area, including up to 5,639 dwelling units at ranges of 1.0 to 25.0 units per acr e. Approximately 985 of the 1,832 acres are dedicated to residential uses, with approximately 40 acres of mixed - uses that could include residential development, retail, office, and public/semi -public facilities.
Other uses included the existing Turkey Cree k Golf Course, open space, parks, an elementary school and city-owned facilities; and
WHEREAS, on September 26, 2023, the City Council adopted amendments to the Village 1 Specific Plan analyzed, including the realignment of Oak Tree Lane, associated revisions to the land use designations and a reduction in the total number of residential units to 5,610; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the adopted Village 1 Specific Plan have been proposed in association with the Stardust 12 Project, specifically to amend the land use designations and zoning for 5.3 acres of Village Low Density Residential and 5.7 acres of Village Country Estates to 11 acres of Village Medium Density Residential; and
WHEREAS, the applicant for the Stardust 12 Project recently received appr oval for the Parkwood Project, which was developed at a lower total unit count than was anticipated in the Specific Plan, such that the combined total number of units for the two projects would be lower than the total assumed in the Specific Plan and EIR for the two project sites; and
260
Resolution No. 2026-
WHEREAS, an Addendum has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, and provides evidence that the proposed amendments would not involve substantial changes requiring major revisions of the previous EIR due to new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the Village 1 EIR; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the proposed Specific Plan Amendments, and recommended that the City Council determine the Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the EIR and certify the Addendum to the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR, and recommended approval of the Specific Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered information contained in the EIR, and finds that the mitigation measures identified therein, imposed on and incorporated by reference into the Village 1 Specific Plan Project, will lessen the significant effects of the amendments; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18.92.040 of the Lincoln Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65854(b)(2), a notice of the time and place of the City Council’s hearing, including a general explanation of the proposed amendment to the Village 1 Specific Plan was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least twenty calendar days before the hearing, and, in addition to notice by publication pursuant to Government Code Section 65854, the City Council provided mailed notice to neighboring property owners and each of the local agencies responsible for essential facilities or services to the Plan Area in accordance with Government Code Section 65091; and
WHEREAS, the Stardust 12 Project includes all of the following entitlements: the California Environmental Quality Act Resolution , this Specific Plan Amendment Resolution, the General Development Plan Amendment Ordinance and the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Amendment to the Village 1 Specific Plan and conducted a public hearing on April 28, 2026.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. This Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Exhibit B specifying the Amendments to the Village 1 Specific Plan, on file with the Community Development Director relative to the Stardust 12 Project.
261
Resolution No. 2026-
Section 2. Pursuant to Section 18.92.060 of the Lincoln Municipal Code, the City Council finds and determines as follows:
a. The proposed Stardust 12 Project will increase the housing stock and diversity in the City by developing 84 medium-density residential units at an overall density of 7.6 units per acre (Housing Element Policy 2 and Policy LU-1.7).
b. The proposed Stardust 12 Project provides for 1.8 acres of open space, and will pay fees to provide parks and recreation opportunities for the enjoyment and well-being of local residents (Land Use Element Policies LU-1.11, LU-12.7, LU-15.17 and LU-15.18).
c. Project residents would have the option of walking and bicycling by connecting to Leavell Ranch Road which will connect to the City’s existing trail network along McBean Park Drive. Therefore, the prop osed Stardust 12 Project is consistent with General Plan policies LU -
1.6, Goal T -5 and related policies that address bicycle and trail circulation (Transportation Element Policies T-5.6, T-5.7, T-5.9, and OSC-7.20).
d. The proposed Stardust 12 Project prese rves and protects existing biological resources including both wildlife and vegetative habitat (Open Space Element Policies OSC-1 and OSC-5 and LU-1.11) by preserving 1.8 acres, approximately 14 percent, of the project site as open space. In addition, the project shall participate in the PCCP and implement applicable mitigation measures contained in the Village 1 EIR (Policy OSC -5.1). The project site does not contain wetlands, so the loss of wetlands within the project site is avoided, consistent with Policies OSC-
5.2 and OSC-5.6.
e. The plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and mitigation measures provided in the EIR to minimize drainage concentrations and impervious coverage (Policy PFS -
4.2).
f. An archaeological study has been conducted within t he project site consistent with Policies OSC 6.3, 6.7, and 6.8.
g. The project will minimize potential land use conflicts by providing larger parcels and building setbacks for lots adjacent to the rural residential uses in the County, consistent with Policy LU-1.14.
Section 3. Upon adoption of the Stardust 12 Project, including the amendments to the Village 1 Specific Plan by the City Council, the Community Development Services Director be directed to retain said Village 1 Specific Plan on permanent public display in the Community Development Department of the City of Lincoln.
262
Resolution No. 2026-
Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and the evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council approves the Stardust 12 Project, including the amendments to th e Village 1 Specific Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director and subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Exhibits:
A. Conditions of Approval
B. Amended Village 1 Specific Plan Land Use Exhibit
263
Resolution No. 2026-
EXHIBIT A
The Amended Village 1 Specific Plan Area is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The Stardust 12 Project shall be subject to the applicable mitigation measures adopted as part of the Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan Project, (SCH No. 2010102018).
2. The amendments to the Village 1 Specific Plan, approved by this action, are se t forth in Exhibit B and incorporated by this reference.
3. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln specifying the terms and conditions of financing public improvements, conditions of development and reimbursement matters. The City Council shall have complete discretion to approve the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and will not be bound by any provisions adopted as part of this resolution. Where any conflict exists between these conditions of approval and the Development Agreement, the terms of the Development Agreement will control.
264
Resolution No. 2026-
EXHIBIT B
The Amended Village 1 Specific Plan is approved subject to the attached exhibit.
265
EXHIBIT B
266
EXHIBIT B
267
3-4
3 Land Use Plan
Table 3.1
Land Use Summary
Land Use Type Land Use
Designation
Acreage
(ac)
Density
Range
(du/ac)
Target
Density
(du/ac)
Maximum
Dwelling
Unit 1
(du)
Maximum
Commercial/
Offi ce
Intensity
(FAR)
Maximum
Commercial/
Offi ce Square
Footage
(sf)
Residential
Village Country Estates VCE 346.0 287.9 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 761 633 -- -- Village Low Density
Residential VLDR 524.3 576.5 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 5.2 2,883 3,011 -- -- Village Medium Density
Residential VMDR 91.0 6.0 - 12.9 10.0 910 -- --
Village High Density
Residential VHDR 28.8 13.0 - 25.0 20.0 576 -- --
Residential Subtotal --
990.1 984.2 -- -- 5,130 -- --
Mixed Use
Village Mixed Use VMU 39.3 13.0 - 25.0 13.0 509 0.35 167,000 Mixed Use Subtotal -- 39.3 -- -- 509 -- 167,000
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Village Parks and Recreation
• Community Park
VPR
55.8 -- -- -- -- --
• Community/
Neighborhood Park 8.8 -- -- -- -- --
• Neighborhood Parks 19.9 19.1 -- -- -- -- --
• Mini Parks 14.113.1 -- -- -- -- --
• Golf Course (Existing) 222.6 -- -- -- -- --
Parks Subtotal -- 321.29 -- -- -- -- --
VILLAGE 1
Specific Plan
Amended December 2, 2019
EXHIBIT B
268
3-6
3 Land Use Plan
Table 3.2
Statistical Summary by Planning Area
Planning
Area
Land Use
Designation
Acreage
(ac)
Density Range
(du/ac)
Target Density
(du/ac)
Maximum
Dwelling Unit 1
(du)
Maximum
Commercial / Offi ce
Intensity
(FAR)
Maximum
Commercial / Offi ce
Square Footage 2
(sf)
1 VLDR 79.6 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 438 -- --
2 VLDR 9.5 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 52 -- --
3 VOS 6.3 -- -- -- -- --
4 VCE 11.0 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 24 -- --
5 VCE 18.5 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 41 -- --
6 VCE 22.4 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 49 -- --
7 VLDR 135.9 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 747 -- --
8 VMDR 28.6 6.0 - 12.9 10.0 286 -- --
9 VMDR 9.6 6.0 - 12.9 10.0 96 -- --
10 VCE VLDR 24.3
43.8 1.0 - 2.9 3.0-5.9 2.2 3.0 54 132 -- --
11 VLDR 67.5 75.9 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 3.0 371 228 -- --
12 VCE 53.1 24.0 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 2.4 117 57 -- --
13a VCE 33.7 19.1 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 1.6 74 31 -- --
14 VMU 29.2 13.0 - 25.0 13.0 378 0.35 123,413
15 VMU 10.1 13.0 - 25.0 13.0 131 0.35 43,587
16 VHDR 8.7 13.0 - 25.0 20.0 174 -- --
17 VHDR 11.4 13.0 - 25.0 20.0 228 -- --
18 VMDR 9.1 6.0 - 12.9 10.0 91 -- --
19 VLDR 17.5 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 96 -- --
20 VCE 10.9 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 24 -- --
21 VLDR 26.6 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 147 -- --
22 VCE 27.3 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 60 -- --
23 VLDR 14.6 3.0 - 5.9 5.5 80 -- --
24 VMDR 12.9 6.0 - 12.9 10 129 -- --
25 VPF 12.1 -- -- -- -- --
26 VHDR 8.7 13.0 - 25.0 20.0 174 -- --
27 VMDR 17.0 6.0 - 12.9 10.0 170 -- --
28 VMDR 13.8 6.0 - 12.9 10.0 138 -- --
VILLAGE 1
Specific Plan
13b VCE 9.9 1.0 - 2.9 2.2 22 -- --
Amended December 2, 2019
EXHIBIT B
269
3-11
3 Land Use Plan
3.3 Residential Development
Village 1 will off er a collection of neighborhoods organized around intimate open space, parks and recreational
amenities. In general, many of the homes in each
neighborhood will be built around a central green or
pocket park, which will serve as the primary formative
feature for the neighborhood’s physical development
pattern, and a gathering place for nearby residents. To establish a pedestrian-friendly community, trails and
pathways will connect the residential neighborhoods with nearby parks, open space areas and the Village Center.
To promote diversity and create dynamic neighborhoods,
a range of home types and densities will be off ered in the residential neighborhoods. The residential development in Village 1 is designed with the most dense housing types located in and around the Village Center, with the housing gradually transitioning to less intense residential uses as development occurs outward away from the Village Center.
The Specifi c Plan includes the following four residential land use designations as follows:
» Village Country Estates (VCE) - 1.0 - 2.9 du/ac
» Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) - 3.0 - 5.9 du/ac » Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR) - 6.0 - 12.9 du/ac
» Village High Density Residential (VHDR) - 13.0 - 25.0 du/ ac
VILLAGE 1
Specific Plan
These designations are generally described below, with
detailed permitted uses, development standards and
design guidelines included in the Village 1 General
Development Plan.
3.3.1 Village Country Estates
Approximately 346.0 287.9 acres of the Specifi c Plan Area are designated as Village Country Estates (VCE). The VCE planning areas will be generally located along the northern, eastern, and southern portions of Village 1, adjacent to open space and/or unincorporated Placer County. At a
density range of 1.0 to 2.9 dwelling units per acre, the VCE planning areas will yield approximately 761 633 units
based on a target density of 2.2 dwelling units per acre, or
13.5 11.1% of the total units in the Specifi c Plan Area. Homes in the VCE planning areas will be conventional single-family detached residences.
Amended December 2, 2019
Amended June 29, 2021
EXHIBIT B
270
3-12
3 Land Use Plan
3.3.2 Village Low Density Residential
The Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) planning
areas, totaling 524.3 576.5 acres, will be generally located adjacent to open space features. With a density range
of 3.0 to 5.9 dwelling units per acre, the VLDR planning areas will provide approximately 2,883 3,011 units based on a target density of 5.5 5.2 dwelling units per acre, or
51.1% 53.4% of the total units in the Specifi c Plan Area.
Development of conventional single-family detached
homes is anticipated in the VLDR planning areas.
3.3.3 Village Medium Density
Residential
Located near the Village Center and the elementary school site, the Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR)
planning areas total approximately 91.0 acres and have a density range of 6.0 to 12.9 dwelling units per acre. The VMDR planning areas will yield approximately 910 units
based on a target density of 10.0 dwelling units per acre, or 16.1% of the total units in the Specifi c Plan area. A wide range of residential products may be located in the VMDR planning areas including, but not limited to, conventional single-family detached homes, rear-loaded homes,
courtyard homes, duplexes/triplexes and townhomes.
3.3.4 Village High Density Residential
Approximately 28.8 acres of the Specifi c Plan area are designated as Village High Density Residential (VHDR),
which have a density range of 13.0 to 25.0 dwelling units per acre. The VHDR planning areas will be located either within or adjacent to the Village Center. There will be approximately 576 units based on a target density of 20 dwelling units per acre, or 10.2% of the total units in the Specifi c Plan area, provided in the VHDR planning areas.
Homes in the VHDR planning areas may include rear-
loaded homes, courtyard homes and multi-family attached housing such as attached housing, townhomes and fl ats.
3.4 Mixed Use Development
Approximately 39.3 acres of land in the Specifi c Plan area have been allocated for mixed use development. Located in the Village Center, the Village Mixed Use (VMU) planning areas are designed to allow for fl exibility to respond to evolving market conditions and promote innovation in
project design. Uses permitted in the VMU planning areas include, but will not be limited to:
» Retail commercial
»O ffi ces
» High density residential
VILLAGE 1
Specific Plan
Amended December 2, 2019
EXHIBIT B
271
Table 5.3
Parkland Requirements
Land Use
Category
Units
Persons per
Household
Population
Estimate
City-wide Park
Requirement 1
Neighborhood/
Community Park
Requirement 1
Open Space
Requirement 1
VCE 761 633 du 3.6 persons
3 acres per
1,000 persons
3 acres per
1,000 persons
3 acres per
1,000 persons
VLDR 2,883 3,011 du 3.6 persons
2,740 2,279 persons
10,379 10,840 persons
VMDR 910 du 2.8 persons 2,548 persons
VHDR 576 du 1.8 persons 1,037 persons
VMU 509 du 1.8 persons 916 persons
Subtotal 5,639du -- 17,620 persons 52.9 acres 52.8 acres 52.9 acres Total Parkland Required 158.6 acres
Type of Parkland Provided 55.8 acres 42.8 0acres 76.0 acres Total Parkland Provided 173.9 6acres 2
1 Based on the City of Lincoln’s parkland requirement of 9 acres per 1,000 residents, including 3 acres of City-wide parks, 3 acres of neighborhood/community parks and 3 acres of open space.
2 Refer to Exhibit 3.3: Open Space and Recreation Plan for conceptual park and open space locations. 5-20
5 Infrastructure
and Public
Facilities Plan
VILLAGE 1
Specific Plan
Amended December 2, 2019
Amended June 29, 2021
EXHIBIT B
272
Ordinance No.
ORDINANCE XXXXB
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE VILLAGE 1 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE STARDUST 12
PROJECT
WHEREAS, Title 18, Chapter 18.32 of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review by the City of Lincoln City Council on all General Development Plans and amendments of General Development Plans; and
WHEREAS, the General Development Plan for the Village 1 Specific Plan Area was approved on November 27, 2012 by Ordinance N o. 873B and sets forth the basic land uses and zoning regulations for the property, and amended on March 24, 2020 by Ordinance No. 1010B (Turkey Creek Estates Project), on October 27, 2020 by Ordinance No. 1020B (Esplanade at Turkey Creek), and on October 10, 2023 by Ordinance No. 1070B (South of McBean Park Revision); and
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012 -196 certifying the Village 1 Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (“EIR), Report Making Findings Co ncerning Mitigation Measures, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Plan, Making Findings Concerning Alternatives and Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the Village 1 Specific Plan P roject; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18.92.040 of the Lincoln Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65854(b)(2), a notice of the time and place of the City Council’s hearing, including a general explanation of the proposed amendment to the Village 1 General Development Plan was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least twenty calendar days before the hearing, and, in addition to notice by publication pursuant to Government Code Section 65854, the City Council provided mailed notice t o neighboring property owners and each of the local agencies responsible for essential facilities or services to the Plan Area in accordance with Government Code Section 65091; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a duly noticed public hearing an d, following discussion and public testimony on March 18, 2026, held votes to adopt resolutions recommending City Council to do the following: determine the Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in t he severity of significant effects previously identified in the Village 1 Final EIR and adopt the proposed Village 1 Addendum and updated Mitigation Monitoring Program; and approve the amended Village 1 Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewe d and considered information contained in the EIR, and finds that the mitigation measures identified therein, imposed on and incorporated by reference into the Village 1 Specific Plan Project, will lessen the significant effects of the amendments; and
273
Ordinance No.
WHEREAS, the Stardust 12 Project includes all of the following entitlements: the California Environmental Quality Act Resolution, the Specific Plan Amendment Resolution, this General Development Plan Amendment Ordinance and the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Amendment to the Village 1 General Development Plan and conducted a public hearing on April 28, 2026.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN does ordain as follows:
Section 1 . This Or dinance i ncorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Exhibit B specifying the Amendments to the Village 1 General Development Plan, on file with the Community Development Director relative to the Stardust 12 Project.
Section 2. General Development Plan Findings. The City Council finds and determines that:
a. The Amendments to the Village 1 General Development Plan are consistent with the March 2008 General Plan, as amended by Resolution No. 2012 -197 and proposed Resolution No. 2013 -022 (the “General Plan Amendment Resolution”) and is also consistent with the proposed Village 1 Specific Plan (the “Specific Plan”), and proposed amendment thereto, because the General Development Plan with the proposed amendment (“Amended General Devel opment Plan”) establishes zoning districts and development standards for land uses which are allowed by the General Plan and Specific Plan land use designations and the policies for new residential, commercial and open space land uses which apply to the Vi llage 1 property. Specifically, the Amended General Development Plan provides for country estates, low density residential, medium density residential and high density residential, mixed use commercial, schools, parks and recreations and open space land u se designations. low density residential and open space land use designations. The Amended General Development Plan provides a master development plan and specific development standards for residential and non-residential land uses within the Specific Plan area.
b. The Amended Village 1 General Development Plan is consistent with the General Plan because the zoning districts provide for the following land use districts which are allowed by the General Plan Land Use designations as Village Country Estates, Village Low Density Residential, Village Medium Density Residential and Village High Density Residential.
Additionally, the Amended General Development Plan includes open space which is consistent with General Plan open space requirements.
c. The Amended Village 1 General Development Plan is consistent with the City’s Zoning Ordinance because it has been prepared pursuant to and for implementation of the Village 1 Specific Plan Area to specify the uses, the locations of such uses, and the governing development standards and design guidelines for the development of a master planned community. The General Development Plan is also consistent with the City’s Zoning Ordinance 274
Ordinance No.
because it consists of a map and text showing all uses, intensity of land use as measured by units per acre and area coverage; major circulation and development phases.
d. The Amended Village 1 General Development Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Planned Development District zone of the City’s Zoning Ordinance which governs the Village 1 property because it has been designed to provide for a creative, more flexible and orderly approach to the use of land.
Section 3. The proposed Amendment to the Village 1 General Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by this reference, is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and the evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Village 1 General Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub -sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 6. Publication. Within fifteen days of passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the Ordinance, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger. In lieu of publishing the full text of the Ordinance, the City Clerk, if so directed by the City Attorney and within fifteen days, shall cause a summary of the Ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney and with the names of the City Councilm embers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger, and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance. The publication of a summary of the Ordinance in lieu of the full text of the Ordinance is authorized only where the requirements of Government Code § 36933(c)(1) are met.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lincoln held on April 28, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
275
Ordinance No.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lincoln held on _____ day of __________________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
_____
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Exhibits:
A. Conditions of Approval
B. Amended Village 1 General Development Plan Pages
276
Ordinance No.
EXHIBIT A
The Amended Village 1 General Development Plan Specific Plan Area is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The All property within the Amended Village 1 General Development Plan Area shall be subject to the applicable mitigation measures adopted as part of the Final EIR for the Village 1 Specific Plan Project (SCH No. 2010102018).
2. The General Development Plan provides for various design criteria related to the Village 1 Specific Plan development. In the event of any conflicts between the standards set forth in the General Development Plan and those adopted by the City in its Design Criteria & Procedures Manual (the “Public Improvement Standards”), the standards set forth in the General Development Plan as amended shall control, except in cases where there are no standards set forth in the General Development Plan, in which case the Public Improvement Standards will control.
3. The amendments to the Village 1 General Development Plan, approved by this action, are set forth in Exhibit B and incorporated by this reference.
4. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln specifying the terms and conditions of financing public improvements, conditions of development and reimbursement matters. The City Council shall have complete discretion to approve the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and will not be bound by any provisions adopted as part of this resolution. Where any conflict exists between these conditions of approval and the Development Agreement, the terms of the Development Agreement will control. 277
Ordinance No.
EXHIBIT B
The Amended Village 1 General Development Plan is approved subject to the attached exhibit.
278
EXHIBIT B
279
Resolution No. 2026-
RESOLUTION 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN
APPROVING THE SMALL LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE STARDUST 12 PARKWOOD PROJECT (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 021-274- 038-000 AND 021-274-039-000) (APPLICANT: JEN CALIFORNIA 28, LLC / PROPERTY OWNER: JAMES B. GUERTIN)
WHEREAS, Title 17, Chapter 17.04 et seq. of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review and recommendations of the City Council on all Tentative Maps; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026 , the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, and recommended approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, notices describing the proposed Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Stardust 12 Project were sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to the Lincoln Municipal Code Section 17.16.150 and notice of the hearing was published in accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City of Lincoln at least ten calendar days before the City Council’s public hearing; and
WHEREAS, prior to recommending approval of the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopted a Resolution approving the Addendum to the Village 1 Final EIR (SCH #2010102018), as the proposed project is consistent with the type and intensity of land uses analyzed in the Final EIR, and no new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts have been identified. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as revised on September 26, 2023, and Alternatives, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted as part of the Final EIR are still applicable to the proposed project, subject to the modified mitigation measure language found within the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, the Stardust 12 Project includes all of the following entitlements: the California Environmental Quality Act Resolution, the Specific Plan Amendment Resolution, the General Development Plan Amendment Ordinance and this Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Stardust 12 Project and conducted a public hearing.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
280
Resolution No. 2026-
Section 1. This Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Stardust 12 Project, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, relative to the proposed development of the Stardust 12 Project on certain real property consisting of 12.8 acres located in the western portion of Village 1 (A PNs 021-274-038-000 and 021 -274-039- 000), which is part of the Village 1 Specific Plan area and within the incorporated area of the City of Lincoln.
Section 2. Pursuant to Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:
a. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Stardust 12 Project is consistent with the Lincoln General Plan and the Village 1 Specific Plan because the Tentative Subdivision Map provides for the subdivision of the plan area in preparation of development in accordance with the General Plan land use designations. Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and the Village 1 Specific Plan, the specific lots are identified for Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR) that will help meet the C ity's housing needs for projected future growth. This planned development will be supported by adequate public services and utilities.
b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision of the Stardust 12 Project is consistent with the General Plan and Village 1 Specific Plan because adequate infrastructure and services will be extended to the property and available to serve the demand for services generated by the residential development, including water, sanitary sewer, storm drain facilities, dry utilities and roadways. The Developer will work with the Police Department to ensure adequate security measures are incorporated into the Project. The Developer will install fire protection measures and emergency access in accordance with the City's standards.
c. The site is physically suitable for the types of development proposed for the Stardust 12 Project because the proposed lot configuration is designed to avoid sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources. An erosion control plan, a complete drainage syste m plan, and a water quality control plan shall be prepared and incorporate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") requirements to protect water quality. The proposed subdivision will include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage crossings in accordance with City standards to prevent blockage of high flows and associated erosion. Each phase of project construction will address 100 -year and 200-year flood conditions as appropriate. With respect to sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources, extensive open space and habitat areas are included in the Project and will be preserved and maintained to avoid or mitigate impacts to such resources.
d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of develop ment as discussed in Finding c. above.
281
Resolution No. 2026-
e. Pursuant to the requirements of the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008, the City Council finds that the property is located within a watershed with a contributing area of 10 or fewer square miles, as determined by the City.
f. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because potential Stardust 12 Project impacts related to the environment will be mitigated to less-than-significant levels, where feasible, in addition to other specific measures set forth above in Finding c.
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause seriou s public health problems since water, sewer, police, fire and solid waste services will be adequately provided to the development.
h. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large , for access through our use of property within the proposed subdivision. Adequate open space is located immediately adjacent to the residential development and will be accessible to the public.
i. The Stardust 12 Project area is not subject to a contract e ntered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
Section 3. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Stardust 12 Project is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. T hese conditions support the findings made by this City Council set forth herein.
Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Stardust 12 Project, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, subject to the attached exhibits.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April, 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
282
Resolution No. 2026-
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Exhibits:
A. Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval B. Stardust 12 Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Plan Set (Sheets 1 through 4), dated February 20, 2026
283
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
The Stardust 12 Small Lot Tentative Subdivision is located within Village 1 Specific Plan Area, located at the so uthwest corner of McBean Parkway/Stardust Lane within the City of Lincoln, Assessor’s Parcel Number 021-274-038 and 021-274-039, is approved subject to the following conditions of approval:
* (Single Asterisk) located in front of the Condition is a Modified Standard Condition ** (Double Asterisk) located in front indicates a New Condition Specific to the Stardust 12 Tentative Subdivision Map Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. All development within the Stardust 12 subdivision is subject to compliance with Mitigation Measures contained within Village 1 Specific Plan EIR and Final Supplemental EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2010102018).
General
Condition
Community
Development
2. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, its Planning Commission, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.
General
Condition
Community
Development
3. The Applicant shall pay the City’s actual costs of providing entitlement processing plan review, Final Map review, GIS, administrative fee under the new fee structure, and inspection services. This may be a combination of staff costs and direct billing for contract professional services.
General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
284
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
4. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln, as per requirements of the approved Village 1 Specific Plan, and the Infrastructure & Public Facilities Financing Plan, which incorporates changes associated with this tentative map for the Applicant. Such Development Agreement shall be executed prior to City Council approval of any Final Map and may establish obligations to be completed prior to approval of any Final Map.
General
Condition
City of Lincoln
5. All improvements required for the Stardust 12 Tentative Subdivision Map shall be designed and constructed to conform to the City of Lincoln Municipal Code, Section 17, Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards or as modified by these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer and/or Community Development Director.
Improvement
Plans/Final Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
6. A) **Applicant shall design and construct the frontage widening along McBean Parkway to ultimate condition with interim striping along the project frontage, concurrently with the construction of the Stardust-12 Subdivision.
B) **If not constructed by others, applicant shall construct offsite public street infrastructure improvements necessary, to include Leavell Ranch Road connection to McBean Parkway (East)prior to approval of the first Final Map.
Improvement
Plans/First Final
Map Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
7. As set forth in the City’s Public Facilities Element Fee (PFE fee program), the project is subject to Infrastructure and Capital Facility Impact Fees categories, including but not limited to: Wastewater Fee; Reclaimed or Raw Water Fee; Drainage Fee; Water Fee; Transportation Fee; and Community Services Fees (which includes Parks, City Administration, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, and Library). Project will not be subject to park fees if project park construction satisfies Village 1 park requirement.
General
Condition
Support
Services
285
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
8. * The Stardust 12 Tentative Subdivision Map shall be subject to those provisions set forth in the approved Village 1 Specific Plan (adopted by Resolution No. 2012-197, dated November 27, 2012), Specific Plan Amendments, and General Development Plan for the Village 1 Plan Area (adopted by Ordinance No. 873B), as amended by Ordinance No. 886B and 1070B, and as may be subsequently amended.
General
Condition
Community
Development
9. *The conditions of approval for the Small Lot Tentative Map dated February 20, 2026 supersede any conflicting notations and information which may be shown on said Map.
General
Condition
Community
Development
10. **Lots 26-31 will be subject to the Village 1 Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) County-adjacent specific setback requirements.
General
Condition
Community
Development
11. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map approval is valid for four (4) years from the date of City Council approval, unless an extension of time is subsequently approved per Government Code Section 66452.6(e), or extended by the terms of a Development Agreement.
General
Condition
City of Lincoln
12. * All improvements and construction within shall be consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan Amendment, General Development Plan, Development Agreement, and the approved Tentative Subdivision Map.
General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
13. *One or more residential small lot final map(s) may be filed. Phasing of the final maps will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
DEVELOPMENT STUDIES/MITIGATION
286
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
14. A) * The design of on-site and backbone water system improvements shall comply with the Water Study to be funded by the Applicant and consistent with the Backbone Water System of the adopted Village 1 Specific Plan Amendment, and Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan.
B)** The design and construction of an alternative looped water supply line shall be required if the water line downstream along Leavell Ranch Road is not in place at the time of the final map approval.
Initial Submittal
of
Improvement
Plans
Prior to final
map approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
15. * The design of on-site sanitary sewer system improvements shall be consistent with the City of Lincoln Design Criteria & Procedures Manual and the approved Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan to ensure onsite sewer system is sized to accommodate offsite sheds.
Initial Submittal
of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
16. A) * *The design of the Stardust 12 storm drainage system improvements shall comply with the Village 1 master drainage analysis. In addition, prior to the approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the on-site drainage system complies with Section 10 of the City Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, specifically Table 10-1, “Allowable Street Encroachments” and Section 10-2 for minimum pad elevations adjacent to designated floodplains and overland routing of flood flows.
B) **Project drainage shall comply with the approved Tentative Subdivision Map (dated February 20, 2026) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Initial Submittal
of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
17. The Applicant shall finalize the preliminary Storm Water Quality Plan (SWQP) with the first submittal of the improvement plans. The SWQP shall incorporate previous comments obtained during entitlement review to comply with the West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual, using updated SWQP templates, and the applicable MS4 permit requirements. Compliance with the MS4 permit may result in the loss of lots.
Initial Submittal
of
Improvement
Plans or
Grading Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
287
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
18. The Applicant shall submit a soils report amendment, if required, prepared by a soil engineer for the development. The report shall identify any grading and/or foundation soil problems on the lots and recommend any necessary corrective action to be taken.
The reports shall be submitted with the Grading Permit or Improvement Plans, whichever occurs first. The reports shall include sub-grade soil evaluation for roadway design and provide suggested structural road sections. The soils report shall provide soil characteristics and geologic information necessary for input into the SWQP templates if required by design criteria.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
19. For those improvements that will affect regulated resources, the Applicant shall have secured all required environmental permits prior to start of construction.
Prior to the
start of
construction/
issuance of
grading permit
Planning
STORM WATER QUALITY/GRADING/DRAINAGE
20. *Each phase of the project shall include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage-way crossings. Applicant shall delineate stormwater treatment areas and volumes for each drain outlet. Culvert sizes must meet the drainage design criteria requirements given under the Lincoln Design Criteria & Procedures Manual and be approved by the City Engineer. Design and construct temporary culverts over natural channels for any stream crossings used during any construction phase. Construction equipment and vehicles must not cross streams without a proper temporary culvert crossing.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
City Engineer
288
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
21. In accordance with the City’s most current standards, no disturbed surface or soil shall be left standing through a winter season without erosion control measures, such as re- vegetation of exposed slopes. Temporary erosion control measures (such as silt fences, staked straw bales, etc.) shall be employed at the base of disturbed slopes until re- vegetation is established.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans or
Grading Permit,
whichever
occurs first.
City Engineer
22. Design and construct energy dissipaters where drainage outlets discharge on erodible soil or into natural drainage ways. Temporary dissipaters may be used for temporary storm runoff outlets during construction phases. Permanent dissipaters shall be included for permanent outlets, unless the Erosion Control Plan indicates that conditions render it unnecessary (subject to the approval of the City Engineer).
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and/or
Final Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
23. The Applicant shall submit a post construction Storm Water Quality Plan with the improvement plans. The project shall comply with the City Ordinance, City’s MS4 permit requirements and any other state mandated requirements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Compliance with the MS4 permit may result in the loss of lots.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
24. The design, maintenance, inspection, and reporting of all storm water systems, devices, and treatment systems by the Applicant shall be in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2013-0001-DWQ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Phase 2 Municipal General Permit No. CAS000004, Waste Discharge Requirements for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and any design guidance developed by the City.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
During
Construction
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
289
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
25. The Applicant shall submit a SWPPP and post construction Erosion Control Plan for each phase of construction for City approval. The Plan shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize and control the level of pollutants in storm water runoff released to off-site receiving waters. Specific techniques shall comply with adopted City Standards.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
During
Construction
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
26. *To the extent Applicant is required to construct stormwater detention facilities, the Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan for storm water quality & LID improvement facilities to be maintained by the Public Services Department.
The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall contain, at a minimum, a description of the constructed facilities, the design criteria, a description of the expected facility operation, a post construction Erosion Control Plan, a post construction Storm Water Quality Control Plan, and a description of maintenance activities required along with a schedule for each activity. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall also contain a description of sampling, testing, and reporting requirements. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall be subject to approval by the Public Services Department.
Prior to
Improvement
Plan
Acceptance
/Final Map
Approval
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services
27. Subject to permits issued by the Placer County Environmental Health Department, locate and properly abandon all septic systems and wells. Prior to abandoning any existing agricultural wells, the Applicant shall use water from the agricultural wells for grading and construction of the project.
Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
or as
determined on
Improvement
Plans
City Engineer
290
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
28. The Applicant shall submit a Blasting Plan (if required) for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to commencing any on-site blasting activities. At a minimum, the Blasting Plan is to include a description of the work to be accomplished, a statement of the necessity to accomplish the work, a description of alternatives to blasting considered but rejected, a description of steps taken to avoid hard rock areas, safety measures to be implemented. The Blasting Plan is to coordinate blasting activities with the Police, Community Development Department, and Fire Departments and specify the time and duration proposed for the activity. The Applicant shall provide 72 hours notification to the above Departments of any scheduled blasting.
Prior to any
blasting
activities
Community
Development,
City Engineer,
Police, Fire
29. ** The Applicant shall design and construct a vehicular maintenance access ramp to the bottom of the stormwater quality basins and any outfalls as part of improvement plans.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services
30. The Applicant shall provide a grading and erosion control security deposit and encroachment permit security in accordance with the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual.
Prior to the
issuance of the
Grading &
Encroachment
Permit.
City Engineer
31. Flagging, fencing, signage, and other devices shall be installed prior to grading on-site.
Fence locations shall be to the approval of the City Engineer and shall require inspection prior to start of grading. Fencing should not be removed unless written approval is obtained from the City Engineer.
Prior to Grading
City Engineer
32. Trees removed during site grading and construction shall be disposed of by means other than landfill or burning.
Prior to Grading City Engineer
291
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
33. Trees not scheduled for removal adjacent to construction areas shall be temporarily fenced around their drip lines to prevent inadvertent damage during construction activity.
Prior to Grading City Engineer
FLOODPLAIN/WETLANDS
34. All future grading shown on the tentative map, including proposed pad elevations, shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Department in accordance with applicable City and FEMA requirements.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
TRANSPORTATION/STREET IMPROVEMENTS
35. ** The construction of Leavell Ranch Road connection to McBean parkway shall be required, if not already built by others, as per approved backbone street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer consistent with adopted Village 1 Specific Plan & Amendment, and any updated infrastructure plans.
Prior to
approval of
Final Map or
Subdivision
Improvement
Agreement
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
36. Traffic striping, markings and signing along the project roadways shall be provided as required by the applicable City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards, as well as the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, latest edition.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
37. The Applicant shall design and construct ADA compliant ramps to allow movement of bicycles from sidewalks to on-street bike lanes where bike/trail routes merge with frontage sidewalks.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
292
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
38. Street names shall be reviewed and approved by the City. The Applicant shall work with the City to determine appropriate names to be incorporated into street names as feasible.
Prior to
approval of
Final Map
Planning
39. Applicant shall provide an executed right of entry/construction easement from neighboring property owners prior to issuance of the grading permit for offsite construction.
Prior to
issuance of
Grading Permit
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
UTILITIES
40. The Preliminary Utility Plan exhibits in the Tentative Map set showing pipe sizing and alignment for utilities are not approved for final design. The utility exhibits shall be updated by technical studies/reports and the Improvement Plans shall incorporate the findings of the technical studies, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
41. ** A. Applicant shall design the drainage infrastructure to discharge into a drainage system to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and consistent with the Village 1 Drainage Master plan.
B. Applicant shall construct the approved drainage infrastructure prior to Final Map or enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
A. Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
B. Prior to Final
Map or SIA
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
42. ** Proposed improvements across Lot-C (utility corridor) shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
293
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
43. If determined necessary by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall design and construct water sampling stations at locations approved by the City Engineer to allow for sampling of the water supply system, pursuant to the State of California and the City of Lincoln, if significant changes are to be proposed from the approved Tentative Map.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
and Public
Services
44. If required, the Applicant shall pay for the cost of the City’s consultant to perform water modeling to access the fire flows by including this project water system into the City’s water model.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
45. The Applicant shall comply with all provisions of the City’s Cross Control and Backflow Prevention Ordinance.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
46. The Applicant shall submit Joint Utility Trench Composite Plans for review by City Engineer.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
47. If/where applicable, subject to the Stardust 12 Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, sewer and water easements located in open space/landscape areas shall have an access road to valves and manholes approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer, and constructed with a minimum easement width of 15-feet and providing an 8-foot wide pave section, acceptable to the City Engineer with 2-foot wide aggregate base shoulders.
Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
FIRE
294
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
48. The final design, layout and line capacity of water and hydrant systems will be subject to approval of the City Engineer in consultation with the Fire Chief prior to start of any phase of underground utility construction.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
49. The final placement of fire hydrants shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Chief during the review of Improvement Plans and consistent with the most current improvement standards for the City.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department
50. Emergency access ways and pedestrian connections shall substantially conform to the locations provided in the approved Tentative Map. Any substantive changes made shall be reviewed with Improvement Plans and be approved by the Fire Department, Community Development Department, and City Engineer.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Community
Development,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department
51. ** The gates and controls to the gates at the EVA to the subdivision shall be designed in compliance with requirements of the City Fire Department. The project shall not connect to Stardust Lane for daily residential access, but shall allow for the proposed EVA. Gated communities to have “Click 2 Enter” and Opticom system programmed for fleet, police, fire channels, if applicable.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Public Safety,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department
PARKS AND TRAILS
295
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
52. The Applicant shall prepare Improvement Plans and construct the dedicated landscape corridors, trails and other open space facilities, consistent with the approved Stardust 12 Tentative Subdivision Map, Village 1 Specific Plan and the General Development Plan.
Trail plans shall be approved with the Public Improvement Plans. Landscape plans may be submitted with the Improvement Plans and reviewed separately from but concurrently with Improvement Plans.
The following specifications shall be applied to trails in the project:
• Trails must be located as shown on the approved Tentative Map. • Provide a striped pedestrian crossing for the trail system when it crosses a public right-of-way.
• Applicant shall install all required signage for the trail.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map.
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
LANDSCAPING
53. *As specified in the Village 1 Specific Plan and Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan, Stardust 12 Landscape Plans shall include drought tolerant, low maintenance re-vegetation and landscaping plans and specifications for landscaped corridors/landscaped medians, common parking lots, prepared by a registered landscape architect. The Plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, City Engineer and the Public Services Director. The plans shall be consistent with the General Development Plan and should blend the project into its natural environment and reflect a design which is sensitive to water use, fire hazards, wildlife and view sheds. The Landscape Plans shall include: planting plans, species lists suited to Lincoln’s climate and soil conditions, Irrigation Plans and water usage calculations consistent with AB 1881 regarding water conservation, backflow devices for potable water uses, stabilization measures for cut and fill slopes and soil preparation methods.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Community
Development,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services
296
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval
CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
54. The Applicant shall be required to use the previously approved Master Tree List Planting Plan for the residential development setting front yard trees in accordance with the adopted General Development Plan for Village 1 Plan Area. The residential Landscape Plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department.
Prior to
issuance of
building permit
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
55. Details and structural calculations for any structures being proposed on the civil and landscape improvement plans shall be submitted for review with the Improvement Plans.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans/issuance
of grading
permit
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
LIGHTING/DESIGN
56. *A Street Lighting Plan shall be submitted to the City with Improvement Plans prior to construction of each project phase. All streetlights shall be LED and Smart Metered to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street light poles (where located in public right-of-way and maintained by City) shall be concrete and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Streetlight spacing within the MDR private streets, onsite, will be per City standards unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. Streetlights and similar fixtures shall be directed away from residences.
The street lighting foundation design shall be included with the Street Lighting Plan.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
57. ** Applicant shall submit a photometric plan to demonstrate street lighting provided meets the City of Lincoln Lighting Standards for coverage (Lumens) for all public streets within the project.
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
297
Exhibit A
Stardust 12- Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval