Agenda packet — Livermore City Council, July 22, 2024 (part 6 of 11)

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A

EXHIBIT B
1082
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
e. Conflict with any local policies
or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or
ordinance?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No Yes
f. Conflict with the provisions of
an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to biological resources were analyzed on pages 3.7-26 through 3.7-40 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to biological resources from the 2018 EIR. The 2018 EIR determined that impacts related to adverse effects on special-status species, riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, federally-protected wetlands and other waters regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and the potential to conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would be less than significant with mitigation. The 2018 EIR determined that impacts related to the movement of wildlife species would be less than significant and there would be no impact regarding the potential to conflict with the provisions of an adopted conservation plan.

The 2018 EIR determined that operational impacts to special-status wildlife would be less than significant with implementation of INSP policies. The 2018 EIR determined that construction associated with future development in the INSP Planning Area could affect special-status plant and wildlife species; however, impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of INSP policies and the following mitigation measures:

MM-BIO-1: Prepare and implement a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan for special-status plant species.

If impacts to special-status plant species are unavoidable, prepare and implement a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan for special-status plant species. If a protocol-level botanical survey reveals the presence of special-status plant species in the Planning Area, all directly affected areas of special-status plants will be documented by a qualified botanist or ecologist retained by project proponents prior to issuance of grading permits, consistent with Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities State of California (CDFW, 2009). Documentation will include density and percent cover; key habitat characteristics, including soil type, associated species, hydrology, and topography; and photographs of preconstruction conditions. Impacts to rare (California Rare Plant Rank 1 and 2) native plant species will be avoided where feasible. If impacts to such species are unavoidable, the

EXHIBIT B
1083
project proponent will notify USFWS and/or CDFW and a qualified botanist or restoration ecologist will prepare a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan in coordination with USFWS and/or CDFW prior to construction to address affected special-status plant species. At least two surveys by a qualified botanist or ecologist per monitoring year.
▪ At least 80 percent of the planted area must support vegetation composition and density consistent with reference population conditions. ▪ At least 80 percent of the planted area must support target species amounts similar to reference feature conditions.
▪ A minimum of five consecutive years of monitoring to ensure success criteria are met
▪ Remedial actions to restore intended ecological function of planted areas that fail to meet the success criteria for three consecutive years.

MM-BIO-2: Avoid nesting birds where feasible.

Proponents (or their contractors) of specific projects under the proposed Plan shall conduct construction activities outside the bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31) to the extent feasible. If construction initiation is unavoidable during this time, the project proponent or its contractor will retain a qualified wildlife biologist with demonstrated nest-searching experience to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds (including raptors, but excluding burrowing owl) within 300 feet and including the near-term or longer-term improvements environmental footprints. Adjacent lands outside the development footprints will be scanned with binoculars from the limit of ground-disturbance and publicly accessible areas.

Preconstruction surveys will occur no more than three days prior to the onset of ground-disturbing activities (including clearing, grubbing, and staging) at each development area. If active nests are found in the development footprints, the biologist will establish a no-disturbance buffer around the nest and mark the buffer perimeter with high visibility fencing, flagging, or pin flags. The size of the buffer will be based on the species' sensitivity to disturbance and planned work activities in the vicinity; typical buffer sizes are 250 feet for raptors and 50 feet for other birds. The buffer will remain in place until the nest is no longer active, as determined by the biologist. Buffers for any nests found outside but within 300 feet of the development sites will be established based on the biologist’s best professional judgment whether the work would result in nest abandonment. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 days or longer at a previously surveyed environmental footprint occurs, another preconstruction survey will be conducted. If structure demolition activities cannot occur outside of the nesting season, the project proponent or its contractor will remove inactive nests from the structure to be demolished and install nest exclusion measures (e.g., fine mesh netting, panels, or metal projectors) outside of the nesting season. All exclusionary devices will be monitored and maintained throughout the breeding season to ensure that they are successful in preventing the birds from accessing the cavities or nest sites. No more than three days prior to structure demolition activities, a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey of all potential nesting habitat on the structures to be demolished/modified and the surrounding areas for the presence of active

EXHIBIT B
1084
nests. If active nests are found on the structures or in the affected area, then demolition/modification activities will not proceed until the biologist verifies that all nests on the structures are inactive. After all surveys and/or nest deterrence activities are completed at each development footprint, the biologist will complete a memorandum detailing the survey effort and results and submit the memorandum to the project proponent within seven days of survey completion.

MM-BIO-3: Avoid burrowing owl nesting where feasible.

Prior to any construction activity planned during the fall and winter non-nesting season (September 1 through January 31) or at any time during the construction process, proponents of projects proposed within the Planning Area will retain a qualified wildlife biologist to conduct a preconstruction survey for burrowing owls.

Surveys will be conducted at each area of suitable habitat that will be disturbed no more than seven days prior to ground-disturbing activities and will cover all suitable burrowing owl habitat subject to disturbance pursuant to CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game, 2012). If any burrowing owls are found within the disturbance area, the project proponent will notify CDFW and will proceed under CDFW direction. If construction is planned to occur during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31), the project proponent will retain a qualified wildlife biologist to conduct a breeding season burrowing owl survey in the year prior to construction. The survey will be conducted to determine if there is a breeding pair within approximately 500 feet of each development footprint, unless the biologist determines that a smaller survey buffer around the construction footprint is warranted based on preexisting background disturbance and conditions. Survey visits will be timed in accordance with CDFW guidelines (California Department of Fish and Game, 2012). This will provide the project team advance notice of nesting owls in the development area and allow ample time to discuss appropriate avoidance measures with CDFW. In addition, preconstruction surveys will be conducted no more than seven days prior to ground disturbance in all areas of the development footprint supporting burrowing owl habitat. If the biologist identifies the presence of a burrowing owl nest in an area scheduled to be disturbed by construction, a 660-foot no-activity buffer will be established and maintained around the nest while it is active. Surveys and buffer establishment will be performed by qualified wildlife biologists, and buffers will be coordinated with CDFW by contacting the appropriate CDFW personnel, and will be subject to CDFW review and oversight.

MM-BIO-4: Avoid tricolored blackbird breeding habitat where feasible.

If construction activities in or within 300 feet of freshwater emergent wetland habitat occur during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31), the project proponent will retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for the presence of a tricolored blackbird nesting colony or nests. If an active nest colony or nest is observed by the qualified biologist, then a no-disturbance buffer of 250 feet will be established until the end of the breeding season or until the nesting colony or nest is determined inactive by the biologist. Nest buffers may be reduced if sitespecific conditions reduce the possibility of near-term or longer-term improvements disturbance, as determined by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW.

EXHIBIT B
1085
MM-BIO-5: Avoid western pond turtle where feasible.

Prior to the start of construction within western pond turtle habitat (i.e., any undeveloped areas within 400 feet of riverine aquatic habitat, freshwater emergent wetlands, vernal pools, or seasonal wetlands), proponents of proposed projects within the Planning Area shall retain a biologist approved by the CDFW to survey for western pond turtles. Surveys will be conducted at each habitat area no more than seven days prior to the initiation of ground disturbance at that location. If preconstruction surveys identify active nests, the biologist will establish 50-foot nodisturbance buffer zones around each nest using temporary orange construction fencing with a four-inch-tall gap below the fence. The fencing will be permeable to young turtles and allow them to move away from the nest following hatching. The buffer zones and fencing will remain in place until the biologist has confirmed that the young have left the nest. If non-nesting pond turtles are found in the footprint, the biologist will remove and relocate them to suitable habitat outside the environmental footprint. Relocation sites will be subject to CDFW approval.

MM-BIO-6: Avoid San Joaquin kit fox and American badger where feasible.

Within one year but no less than three months prior initiating construction, proponents of specific projects within the Planning Area will retain qualified biologists to identify potential kit fox and badger dens in the development footprint and surrounding 200 feet. The biologist will prepare a report summarizing the survey observations and results, including maps depicting the locations of potential badger dens and, if possible, occupancy. The report will be submitted to the project proponent and CDFW. Prior to construction, the project proponent will retain qualified biologists to implement preconstruction surveys of previously identified potential kit fox and badger dens to determine if they are natal kit fox or American badger dens no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the initiation of construction at each development footprint (e.g., one week ahead of the construction crew for linear components). Construction activities will not occur within 100 feet of a potential den during the natal period (February 1 to September 30). If a known den or natal den is present within the permanent construction footprint or within 200 feet of the construction footprint during the natal period (100-foot buffer during the non-natal period), the kit fox or badger will be excluded outside of the natal period (from November 1 to January 31). A summary report will be prepared by the biologists and submit to the project proponent and CDFW following completion of all kit fox or badger avoidance and exclusion activities.

MM-BIO-7: Avoid California tiger salamander, western spadefoot and California red-legged frog where feasible.

Proponents of specific projects within the Planning Area shall retain a USFWS and/or CDFW approved biologist (as appropriate) to identify and flag (pin flags or 4- foot lath) all suitable aquatic habitat for California tiger salamander, western spadefoot and California red-legged frog outside of but adjacent to development footprints and ground-disturbance areas prior to staging, vegetation clearing, grading, or other construction activities. The project proponent or its contractor will protect habitat areas by installing orange exclusion and erosion control fencing at the maximum practicable distance from the work site or, if feasible, at least 500 feet

EXHIBIT B
1086
from the aquatic habitat edge, wet or dry, to make it easily visible by construction crews. A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey each morning before construction activities begin and continue to monitor ground-disturbing construction activities where suitable habitat occurs during all phases of construction to remove any California tiger salamander, western spadefoot and California red-legged frogs found in the development footprint. Individual salamanders and frogs will be moved immediately to a relocation site that is a minimum of 330 feet from the construction boundary. The relocation site will be determined in coordination with USFWS and/or CDFW prior to the commencement of construction activities. Construction activities near drainages and wetland complexes identified as potential movement corridors shall take place between July 1 and October 1, when the California tiger salamander, western spadefoot and California red-legged frog are least likely to be present in the development area. To discourage California tiger salamander, western spadefoot and California red-legged frogs from entering the improvements areas via ditches, the ditches will be equipped with lightweight, one-way flow gates.

MM-BIO-8: Avoid Callippe silverspot butterfly where feasible.

Prior to construction, proponents of specific projects within the Planning Area will retain a qualified botanist or biologist with experience in identifying Viola pedunculata, the host plant for Callippe silverspot butterfly, to identify and flag (with pin flags or 4-foot lath) any Viola pedunculata individuals during its blooming season (February to April) when the species is readily identifiable in and within 50 feet of the near-term and longer-term improvements that will affect California annual grassland. The locations of Viola pedunculata outside of the ground disturbance area of the near-term or longer-term improvements will be included on grading plans and avoided by construction personnel. The biologist will document the number and density of host plants that are unavoidable in development footprints. This information shall be compiled in a report and submit to USFWS prior to initiation of ground disturbance. The project proponent or its contractor will adhere to the following host plant avoidance measures:
▪ No herbicide application will occur within 100 feet of host plant populations.

Spot application to cut stumps, frilled stems, or injection into stems is acceptable. No broadcast herbicide applications will be used. ▪ Cut trees that are removed in the vicinity of host plants will be hand carried rather than dragged to disposal areas.
▪ Avoid or minimize the removal of host plant, Viola pedunculata. ▪ Avoid work in suitable habitat during the flight and mating season (mid-May to mid-July) to the extent feasible.

MM-BIO-9: Avoid roosting bats where feasible.

If tree removal and trimming cannot be conducted between September 15 and October 30, proponents of projects implemented under the proposed Plan will retain a qualified biologist to examine trees to be removed or trimmed for suitable bat roosting habitat no more than 2 weeks before removal and trimming. Highquality habitat features (large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark,

EXHIBIT B
1087
larger snags, palm trees with intact thatch, etc.) will be identified and the area around these features searched for bats and bat signs (e.g., guano, culled insect parts, urine staining, etc.). Mixed willow riparian scrub and stands of mature broadleaf trees should be considered potential habitat for solitary foliage-roosting bat species. Passive monitoring using full spectrum bat detectors may be needed if identification of bat species is required. Survey methods will be discussed with CDFW prior to the start of surveys. Measures to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive bats species will be determined in coordination with CDFW and may include the following:
▪ Tree removal will be avoided between April 1 and September 15 (the maternity period) to avoid effects on pregnant females and active maternity roosts (whether colonial or solitary).
▪ All tree removal will be conducted between September 15 and October 30, which corresponds to a time period when bats have not yet entered torpor or would be caring for nonvolant (non-flying) young.
▪ Each tree will be removed in pieces rather than felling the entire tree. ▪ If a maternity roost is located, whether solitary or colonial, that roost will remain undisturbed until September 15 or a qualified biologist has determined the roost is no longer active.
▪ If avoidance of nonmaternity roost trees is not possible, and tree removal or trimming must occur between October 30 and September 15, qualified biologists will monitor tree trimming and removal. If possible, tree trimming and removal should occur in the late afternoon or evening when it is closer to the time that bats would normally arouse. Prior to removal and trimming, each tree will be shaken gently and several minutes should pass before felling trees or limbs to allow bats time to arouse and leave the tree. The biologists will search downed vegetation for dead and injured bats. The presence of dead or injured bats that are species of special concern will be reported to CDFW. The biologist will prepare biological monitoring report, which will be provided to the project proponent and CDFW.

The 2018 EIR determined that changes resulting from future development under the INSP would result in a potentially significant impact on riparian vegetation. However, with implementation of the proposed Plan policies, and mitigation measures listed below, this impact would be reduced to a less than significant level:

MM-BIO-10: Avoid and protect riparian habitat during construction.

Proponents of specific projects under the proposed Plan will ensure that a qualified resource specialist (i.e., biologist, botanist, or ecologist) will clearly identify riparian habitat to be preserved abutting the development area and outside of the direct construction area with high-visibility construction fencing or markers (e.g., lathe or pin flags) before site preparation. Construction will not encroach upon sensitive natural communities identified by the resource specialist. The resource specialist will use the project’s verified wetland delineation, soils data, and land cover data to confirm the location of riparian habitat boundaries based on existing conditions at the time of the avoidance marking. Exclusion fencing or markers will be installed before construction activities are initiated, and the fencing will be maintained

EXHIBIT B
1088
throughout the construction period. No construction activity, traffic, equipment, or materials will be permitted in fenced sensitive natural community areas. Exclusion fencing and markers will be removed following completion of construction activities. All conditions imposed by State and federal permits for individual improvements will be clearly identified in the construction plans and specifications and monitored during and after construction to ensure compliance.

MM-BIO-11: Compensate for loss of riparian habitat.

For direct effects on woody riparian trees that cannot be avoided, proponents of specific projects under the proposed Plan will compensate for the loss of riparian habitat to ensure no net loss of habitat functions and values. Compensation ratios will be based on site-specific information and determined through coordination with the appropriate State and federal agencies during the permitting process. At a minimum, the compensation ratio will be 2:1 (e.g., two acres restored/created/enhanced or credits purchased for every 1 acre removed) for permanent impacts and 1:1 for temporary impacts (where riparian habitat will regenerate to pre-activity character within one year). Compensation may be a combination of offsite restoration or mitigation credits. The project proponent or its contractor will develop a restoration and monitoring plan that describes how riparian habitat will be enhanced or recreated and monitored over at least 5 years, or as determined by the appropriate State and federal agencies. If the project proponent identifies suitable onsite areas (adjacent to the permanent construction footprint) that are outside the development footprint and chooses to compensate onsite or in the project’s vicinity, a revegetation plan will be prepared. The revegetation plan will be developed prior to the removal of existing riparian vegetation and will be conducted onsite or in the near-term or longer-term improvements vicinity to the extent feasible; however, mitigation site selection will avoid areas where future development or maintenance are likely. The revegetation plan will be prepared by a qualified botanist or restoration specialist with experience in riparian restoration and reviewed by the appropriate agencies. The revegetation plan will specify the planting stock appropriate for each riparian land cover type and each mitigation site, ensuring the use of genetic stock from the corresponding development area by project. The plan will employ the most successful techniques available at the time of planting. Success criteria will be established as part of the plan and will include a minimum of 70 percent revegetation success after three years, 80 percent revegetation success at the end of five years, and 75 percent vegetative coverage after five years. The project proponent or its contractor will retain a qualified botanist, restoration ecologist, or biologist with experience in riparian restoration to monitor the plantings as necessary for five years. The project proponent or its contractor will be responsible for maintaining the plantings, including managing invasive plants (as defined by the California Invasive Plant Council) and other weeds, and implementing irrigation and plant protection if necessary. The project proponent or its contractor will submit annual monitoring reports to the regulatory agencies issuing permits related to habitat effects, including CDFW, USACE, and USFWS. Replanting will be necessary if success criteria are not met, and replacement plants subsequently will be monitored and maintained to meet the success criteria. The riparian habitat

EXHIBIT B
1089
mitigation will be considered successful when the sapling trees established meet the success criteria, the habitat no longer requires substantial active management, and vegetation is arranged in groups that, when mature, replicate the area, natural structure, stratification, and species composition of similar riparian habitats in the region.

The 2018 EIR determined that changes resulting from future development under the INSP would result in a potentially significant impact on wetlands and other waters; however, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of INSP policies and the following mitigation measures:

MM-BIO-12: Avoid and protect wetlands during construction.

Proponents of specific projects under the proposed Plan will ensure that a qualified resource specialist (i.e., wetland biologist, ecologist, or soil scientist) will clearly identify wetland areas to be preserved abutting the development area and wetland areas outside of the direct construction area with high-visibility construction fencing or markers (e.g., lathe or pin flags) before site preparation. Construction will not encroach upon jurisdictional wetlands identified by the resource specialist. The resource specialist will use the development footprint and verified wetland delineation to confirm the location of wetland boundaries based on existing conditions at the time of the avoidance marking. Exclusion fencing or markers will be installed before construction activities are initiated, and the fencing will be maintained throughout the construction period. No construction activity, traffic, equipment, or materials will be permitted in fenced wetland areas. Exclusion fencing and markers will be removed following the completion of construction activities. All conditions imposed by the projects’ State and federal permits will be implemented as part of the construction, with ultimate enforcement oversight by applicable State and federal agencies. The conditions will be clearly identified in the construction plans and specifications and monitored during and after construction to ensure compliance.

MM-BIO-13: Compensate for impacts on jurisdictional wetlands and non-wetland waters of the United States (aquatic resources) prior to near-term and longer-term improvements impacts during construction.

If projects impact jurisdictional wetlands and non-wetland waters, proponents of these specific projects under the proposed Plan will develop an aquatic resource (wetlands and non-wetland waters of the United States) mitigation plan, subject to approval by the USACE, which will ensure no net loss of wetlands from development impacts. The plan will detail the amount and type of wetlands (based on the projects’ verified wetland delineation) that will be compensated for (through preservation, creation, or restoration) for impacts on existing wetlands and nonwetland waters of the United States (aquatic resources), and outline the monitoring and success criteria for the compensation wetlands and non-wetland waters of the United States. Additional enhancement options include fish barrier removal, riparian restoration, floodplain restoration, and streambank layback to improve overall ecologic function and connectivity of wetland and non-wetland waters.

Enhancement sites will be located as near the impact location as possible but, in the event that local enhancement opportunities are not available, such activities will occur within the same stream system or watershed to provide improved ecologic

EXHIBIT B
1090
function and connectivity of wetlands and non-wetland waters affected by development activities.

Monitoring and success criteria applicable to created or restored wetlands will require the following:
▪ At least two surveys by a qualified wetland biologist, botanist, or ecologist per monitoring year. ▪ At least 80 percent of the created or restored features support vegetation consistent with reference feature conditions.
▪ At least 80 percent of the created or restored features support hydrologic regimes similar to reference feature conditions.
▪ A minimum of five consecutive years of monitoring to ensure success criteria are met. ▪ Remedial actions to restore intended ecological function of created or restored features that fail to meet the success criteria for three consecutive years. ▪ Once the plan is approved, the project proponent will implement the aquatic resource compensation measures prior to the initiation of development construction. The project proponent will be responsible for funding compensatory mitigation, monitoring of the created or restored features per the mitigation plan, and any remedial actions necessary. All conditions that are attached to the State and federal permits will be implemented as part of the development project, with ultimate enforcement oversight by applicable State and federal agencies. The conditions will be clearly identified in the construction plans and specifications and monitored during and after construction to ensure compliance.

The following describes the analysis included in the 2018 EIR and provides a review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to the project or the parcels on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in a previous environmental documents as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not previously discussed in the previous environmental documents; and 4) are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the previous environmental documents due to substantial new information.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The 2018 EIR determined that operational impacts to special-status wildlife would be less than significant with implementation of INSP policies and construction associated with future development in the INSP Planning Area could affect special-status plant and wildlife species; however, impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of INSP policies and mitigation measures MM-BIO-1 through MM-BIO-9.

The biological resource assessment (BRA) (WRA 2023; included as Appendix C) prepared to assess current conditions on the Isabel Crossing Parcels determined that 12 protected species that were with potential to occur according to the 2018 EIR no longer have potential to occur, or are now unlikely to occur, on the Isabel Crossing Parcels. Unless otherwise specified below, the Isabel Crossing Parcels do not provide suitable habitat for these species:

EXHIBIT B
1091
▪ Big-scale balsamroot (Balsamorhiza macrolepis; California Rare Plant Rank 1B.2) ▪ Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii; California Rare Plant Rank 1B.1): not observed in protocol-level surveys (October 2022), assumed absent ▪ Prostrate vernal pool navarretia (Navarretia prostrata; California Rare Plant Rank 1B.2) ▪ Callippe silverspot butterfly (Speyeria callippe; Federal Endangered): outside of known range, no serpentine soils are present that could support host plants ▪ Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor; State Threatened, CDFW Species of Special Concern) ▪ California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense; Federal Threatened, State Threatened) ▪ California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii; Federal Threatened, CDFW Species of Special Concern)
▪ Western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata; CDFW Species of Special Concern) ▪ Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii; CDFW Species of Special Concern, WBWG High Priority): no suitable habitat
▪ Hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus; WBWG Medium Priority): no suitable habitat ▪ American badger (Taxidea taxus; CDFW Species of Special Concern) ▪ San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica; Federal Endangered, State Threatened) The BART Parcel is currently undeveloped, and may also provide suitable habitat for special-status species, similar to the Isabel Crossing Parcels, as noted above. The BART Parcel remains vacant grassland, with no substantial changes to the property having occurred since the 2018 EIR.

The Comcast Parcels are currently developed with commercial/office buildings and associated surface parking lots. The Comcast Parcels remain substantially unchanged since the 2018 EIR, with site changes limited to the growth of landscaped vegetation.

The proposed project would be entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR for the original project. The project site is not located in a critical habitat for threatened or endangered species (USFWS 2022). The nearest critical habitat area for the California red-legged frog is approximately 0.2 miles northeast of the Comcast Parcels (USFWS 2022). The proposed Isabel Crossing Project would involve excavation for building foundations, associated utilities, and amenities such as a pool, which are not substantially different from expected projects discussed in the 2018 EIR. Future development of the BART and Comcast Parcels would result in a similar level of ground disturbance. The proposed level of disturbance and project footprint would not exceed what was analyzed in the 2018 EIR.

Mitigation measures MM-BIO-2 and MM-BIO-3 and INSP policies described in the 2018 EIR for the original project would continue to apply to the proposed Isabel Crossing Project. Due to the findings of the 2023 BRA, mitigation measures MM-BIO-1, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, and -9 are not required for the proposed Isabel Crossing Project. Therefore, because under current conditions there are fewer biological resources on the site and because the level of disturbance would not be increased, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to special-status wildlife beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

No specific development projects are proposed on the No Net Loss Parcels at this time. Future development would be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures from the 2018 EIR as well as applicable INSP policies, including P-ENV-21, which requires that new development inventory sensitive resources and develop adequate measures to avoid or mitigate impacts for any parcel that may include special-status species. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in

EXHIBIT B
1092
new or more severe impacts related to protected wetlands beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The 2018 EIR determined that changes resulting from future development under the INSP would result in a potentially significant impact on riparian vegetation. However, with implementation of the INSP policies and mitigation measures MM-BIO-10 and MM-BIO-11, impacts would be less than significant.

As described in the 2023 BRA (WRA 2023; included as Appendix C), the Isabel Crossing project site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. Mitigation measures MM-BIO-10 and MM-BIO-11 are not required for the Isabel Crossing Project.

No specific development projects are proposed on the No Net Loss Parcels at this time. Future development would be required to adhere to INSP Policies P-ENV-21, which requires that new development inventory sensitive resources and develop adequate measures to avoid or mitigate impacts for any parcel that may include special-status species; and P-ENV-23, which requires that development activities either obtain compensatory habitat mitigation through the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS), or use the mitigation prescribed in EACCS as a basis for nearterm and longer-term mitigation and obtain coverage under separate applicable State and federal permits from CDFW and USFWS. Therefore, with implementation of relevant mitigation measures and INSP policies, there would be no new or more severe impacts to these biological resources beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.
c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
The 2018 EIR determined that changes resulting from future development under the INSP would result in a potentially significant impact on wetlands and other waters; however, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of INSP policies and mitigation measures MM-BIO-12 and MM-BIO-13.

An aquatic resources delineation was prepared for the Isabel Crossing Parcels to assess current conditions and is included as Appendix D. During site visits in January and October 2022, qualified biologists observed and delineated a small stand of cattails (Typha domingensis) an obligate wetland plant species. Hydric soil indicator, surface water, and saturation indicators were met in October, meeting USACE’s technical criteria for a wetland. On revisiting historic imagery, WRA determined that cattails were absent between 2008-2021, suggesting the wetland was created from a broken irrigation line; this human-made isolated wetland is unlikely to be federally jurisdictional. This feature is not adjacent to a stream or other water body and would therefore not be regulated by the CDFW. The Isabel Crossing Project would not require grading or ground disturbance that would substantially exceed that planned for the original project, and development intensity and building footprints would not exceed development discussed in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

If it is determined that the wetland is jurisdictional, INSP policies and mitigation measures described in the 2018 EIR would still apply to the proposed Isabel Crossing Project.

EXHIBIT B
1093
No specific development projects are proposed on the No Net Loss Parcels at this time; however, future development would be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures from the 2018 EIR, and applicable INSP policies, including Policy P-ENV-21, which requires that new development inventory sensitive resources and develop adequate measures to avoid or mitigate impacts for any parcel that may include special-status species habitat; Policy P-ENV-25, which requires that project proponents or their contractors install exclusion fencing and erosion control measures prior to any ground disturbance within 50 feet of wetlands; and Policy P-ENV-26, which requires that construction within 300 feet of freshwater marsh or streambank habitat take place during the nonbreeding season for tricolored blackbirds. Therefore, with implementation of relevant mitigation measures and INSP policies, there would be no new or more severe impacts to protected wetlands beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.
d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The 2018 EIR determined that due to existing human activity and visitation, and existing human and vehicle noise, the INSP Planning Area does not likely serve as a habitat corridor and development in the INSP Planning Area is unlikely to interfere with wildlife species movement, therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

The Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are located entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR for the original project. The proposed Isabel Crossing Project would involve excavation for building foundations, associated utilities, and amenities such as a pool, which are not substantially different from the level of development analyzed in the 2018 EIR. No specific development projects are proposed on the No Net Loss Parcels at this time, however, development from the proposed Isabel Crossing Project and future development that would be allowed by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would not exceed the development footprint identified in the INSP and analyzed in the 2018 EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to special-status wildlife beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The 2018 EIR determined that the removal of regulated trees without a permit or appropriate compensation would result in a significant impact, however, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of INSP Policy P-ENV-28, which requires project proponents to compensate for tree removal during construction, including obtaining a tree removal permit; and developing a tree avoidance, minimization, and replacement plan.

The proposed project is entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR for the original project. The City of Livermore Tree Preservation Ordinance in Section 12.20 of the Livermore Municipal Code protects native tree species with a trunk circumference of 24 inches or more and non-native trees with a trunk circumference of 60 inches or more. The Isabel Crossing Parcels include trees that have not been identified as native or non-native, but have a trunk circumference greater than 24 inches; these trees are located along the west side of the project site along Shea Center Drive. If these trees are removed, the City’s tree preserveration ordinance would be applicable to the proposed project, and INSP Policy P-ENV-28 would continue to apply. No specific development projects are proposed on the No Net Loss Parcels at this time; however, future

EXHIBIT B
1094
development would be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures from the 2018 EIR, and applicable INSP policies, including Policies P-ENV-21, which requires that new development inventory sensitive resources and develop adequate measures to avoid or mitigate impacts for any parcel that may include special-status species habitat; and P-ENV-28, which requires consistency with the City of Livermore’s Street Tree and Tree Preservation Ordinance Chapter 12.20. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to conflicts with local policies and ordinances beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project. f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
The 2018 EIR determined that the INSP Planning Area is not located within an adopted conservation plan area; therefore, there would be no impact regarding the potential to conflict with adopted conservation plans.

The proposed project is entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR for the original project, and the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are not located on any new Natural Wildlife Conservation Plan or California Natural Community Conservation Plan areas (CDFW 2023a, 2023b).

The proposed project is also covered by the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (2011) which includes the City of Livermore. As described in the 2018 EIR, projects within the INSP Planning Area are requried to be consistent with this Conservation Strategy through INSP Policy P-ENV-23.

Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with this plan. The proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to adopted conservation plans beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1095

4.5 Cultural Resources
Where was Impact
Analyzed in the
EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of
a historical resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
Pages 3.13-14
through 3.13-15
of the 2018 EIR
No No Yes
b. Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of
an archaeological pursuant to
§15064.5?
Pages 3.13-16 of
the 2018 EIR
No No Yes
c. Disturb any human remains,
including those interred
outside of formal
cemeteries?

Page 3 ends

through 3.13-19
of the 2018 EIR
No No Yes
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to cultural resources were analyzed on pages 3.13-14 through 3.13-19 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to cultural resources from the 2018 EIR.

The 2018 EIR determined that the implementation of the Isabel Neighborhood Plan would cause a substantial change to the significance of a historical resource and impacts would be significant and unavoidable even with implementation of INSP policies. Impacts to archeological and paleontological resources were determined to be less than significant. Impacts to human remains were determined to be less than significant with implementation of P-ENV-37, which specifies the protocol in the event of the discovery of human remains, including ceasing excavation, contacting the county coroner, and contacting the Native American Heritage Commission if necessary.

EXHIBIT B
1096
Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Cultural resources are site-specific. The project would involve construction of a mixed-use development on the Isabel Crossing Parcels and a land use designation change to allow for future residential uses on the No Net Loss Parcels. Previous and current efforts to identify cultural resources within the Isabel Crossing Parcels did not result in the identification of historic built environment resources, archaeological resources, or human remains. Records search results did not indicate the presence of recorded cultural resources within the Isabel Crossing or No Net Loss Parcels. The Isabel Crossing Project would involve significant excavation for building foundations, associated utilities, and amenities such as a pool, which are not substantially different from expected projects discussed in the 2018 EIR. However, background and archival research as well as results from a negative Sacred Lands File and records search conducted for this project in September and October 2023 indicate that the area is not sensitive to containing subsurface archaeological resources or human remains. Future development of the No Net Loss Parcels would result in similar levels of ground disturbance to the Isabel Crossing Project. Future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to comply with INSP Policy P-ENV-37, which requires a project-level cultural resources study. Both the Isabel Crossing Project and future development of the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to comply with INSP Policies P-ENV-37 and P-ENV-40, which address potential impacts to archaeological resources and human remains respectively.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to cultural resources beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1097

4.6 Energy
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Result in a potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operation?
Pages 3.4-22
through 3.4-29
of the 2018 EIR
Pages 3.3-24
through 3.3-31
of the 2020
SEIR
No No N/A
b. Conflict with or obstruct a
state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
N/A No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to energy were analyzed on pages 3.4-22 through 3.4-29 of the 2018 EIR and pages 3.3-24 through 3.3-31 of the 2020 SEIR. Energy impacts were determined to be less than significant in the 2018 EIR and the 2020 SEIR.

The following describes the analysis included in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR and provides a review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to the project or the parcels on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in a previous environmental documents as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not previously discussed in the previous environmental documents; and 4) are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the previous environmental documents due to substantial new information.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
b. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
The 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR determined that the original project would not result in the unnecessary consumption of energy resources.

As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Isabel Crossing Project would result in fewer residents on the Isabel Crossing Parcels than the original project and would not exceed the commercial or office space planned for the original project. Development facilitated by the proposed and future land use designation changes on the No Net Loss Parcels would have the potential to increase the number of residential units compared with the INSP; however, the commercial and office space would be reduced. The proposed Isabel Crossing Project, as well as

EXHIBIT B
1098
future development of the No Net Loss Parcels, would not involve the use of unusual construction equipment or materials that were not accounted for in the original project and analyzed in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. Similar to the original project, the proposed Isabel Crossing Project and future development of the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to comply with applicable State and local energy efficiency, renewable energy, green building, water conservation, and solid waste diversion plans and requirements for new development. The proposed project would be required to comply with the policies in the INSP that encourage renewable energy production, bicycle and pedestrian trips, and carpooling. The proposed project would therefore result in no new or more severe impacts related to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources; or the potential to conflict with state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency beyond that identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1099

4.7 Geology and Soils
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:

1. Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for
the area or based on
other substantial
evidence of a known
fault?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A

2. Strong seismic ground
shaking?
Pages 3.12-15
through 3.12-
16 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A

3. Seismic-related ground
failure, including
liquefaction?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A

4. Landslides? Pages 3.12-16
through 3.12-
17 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A
b. Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Pages 3.12-17
through 3.12-
18 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A
c. Be located on a geologic unit
or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable
as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or
off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A

EXHIBIT B
1100
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
d. Be located on expansive soil,
as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial
direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
Pages 3.12-18
through 3.12-
19 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A
e. Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater
disposal systems where
sewers are not available for
the disposal of wastewater?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
f. Directly or indirectly destroy
a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique
geologic feature?

Page 3 ends

through 3.13-
18 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to geology and soils were analyzed on pages 3.12-15 through 3.13-18 of the 2018 EIR.

Impacts to paleontological resources were analyzed on pages 3.13-17 through 3.13-18 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to geology and soils from the 2018 EIR. The 2018 EIR determined that seismic activity, unstable soil, expansive soils, and paleontological resources would be less than significant and that there would be no impact regarding soils incapable of supporting septic tanks.

Project-Specific Impacts
a.1 Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? The 2018 EIR determined that there are no known active faults within the INSP planning area; therefore, there would be no impact resulting from the rupture of a known earthquake fault.

Because the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are entirely within the INSP Planning Area

EXHIBIT B
1101
considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project. a.2 Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? The 2018 EIR determined that compliance with existing CBC requirements, Caltrans standards, and standard industry practices would reduce potential impacts from ground shaking to the extent feasible and impacts would be less than significant.

Because the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project. The proposed project would increase residential density and decrease commercial/office space compared with development planned for the INSP. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from risk of loss, injury, or death related to seismic ground shaking risks beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.
a.3 Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? The 2018 EIR determined that in areas of moderate risk of liquefaction where buildings or roadways would be constructed, impacts from ground failure resulting from liquefaction would be addressed through site-specific geotechnical studies prepared in accordance with CBC requirements or Caltrans standards and standard industry practices. These studies would reduce potential impacts related to ground-failure resulting from liquefaction to a less than significant level.

Because the project site is entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would not result in a larger development footprint than was considered in the INSP and 2018 EIR. Like the original project, the Isabel Crossing Project and future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be subject to site-specific geotechnical studies. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from risk of loss, injury, or death related to seismic ground failure or liquefaction risks beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR. a.4 Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
The 2018 EIR determined that compliance with CBC requirements or Caltrans standards and adherence to standard industry practices would ensure that adverse landslide impacts would be less than significant.

Because the project site is entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would not result in a larger development footprint than was considered in the INSP and 2018 EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from risk of loss, injury, or death associated with landslides beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR. b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The 2018 EIR determined that compliance with applicable codes and regulations would reduce the potential for substantial soil erosion or topsoil loss resulting from implementation of the original project to be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1102
Because the project site is entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would not result in a larger development footprint than was considered in the INSP and 2018 EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from risks related to soil erosion or topsoil loss beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR. c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
The 2018 EIR determined that potential hazards of unstable soil or geologic units would be addressed through the integration of geotechnical information into the planning and design process for future projects within the INSP Planning Area and that geotechnical investigations would be enforced through compliance with CBC requirements or Caltrans standards. Therefore, with compliance with standard industry practices and State requirements, impacts related to landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse resulting from implementation of the original project were determined to be less than significant.

Because the project site is entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would not result in a larger development footprint than was considered in the INSP and 2018 EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from unstable soils beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR. d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? The 2018 EIR determined that development in areas with expansive and corrosive soils would require compliance with State and local building codes (structures) or with Caltrans standards (roadways). Compliance with these codes or standards would require soil and geologic investigations, which would ensure that the impact resulting from the location of structures on expansive or corrosive soils would be less than significant.

Because the proposed project is entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would not result in a larger development footprint than was considered in the INSP and 2018 EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts from risks related to expansive soils beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR. e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
The 2018 EIR determined that new development would tie into the City’s existing wastewater collection system. Therefore, implementation of the INSP would have no impact related to the location of structures on soils incapable of supporting septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems.

Because the proposed project is entirely within the INSP Planning Area considered under the 2018 EIR and would tie into the City’s existing wastewater collection system, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1103
f. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
The 2018 EIR found that the INSP Planning Area is highly sensitive for paleontological resources.

However, the 2018 EIR determined that implementation of Policies P-ENV-35 and P-ENV-36 would avoid potentially significant impacts to paleontological resources, and impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level.

Paleontological resources and unique geologic features are site-specific. The Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are entirely within the Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR. The project proposes changes to land use compared to the original project; however, the overall buildout would not exceed development planned for the original project, and excavation would occur within areas identified for grading under the original project and analyzed in the 2018 EIR. Furthermore, the project would be required to implement INSP Policies P-ENV-35 and P-ENV-36, consistent with the original project. Therefore, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts on paleontological resources beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

EXHIBIT B
1104
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1105

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR

Page 3 ends

the 2020 SEIR
No No Yes
b. Conflict with an applicable
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR

Page 3 ends

the 2020 SEIR
No No Yes
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to GHG emissions were analyzed on pages 3.4-1 through 3.4-48 of the 2018 EIR and pages

3.3-1 through 3.3-52of the 2020 SEIR. Greenhouse gas emission impacts related to the generation of construction and operational GHG emissions and conflicts with applicable plans related to GHG emission reductions were determined to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 (provided under Section 4.3, Air Quality), Policy P-LU-60, Policy P-ENV-15, and Mitigation Measure GHG-1 (provided below).

MM GHG-1: Operational GHG Emissions Reduction Measures. Implement the following GHG emissions reduction strategies to guide future development within the Planning Area:

1. Require that a minimum of 20 percent of housing allowed under the proposed Project be affordable (below market-rate) housing.

2. Incorporate street and intersection traffic calming measures to a minimum of 25 percent of streets and intersections in the Planning Area. Street traffic calming features may include, but are not limited to, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes, horizontal shifts (lane centerline that curves or shifts), bollards, rumble strips, and woonerfs, Intersection traffic calming measures may include, but are not limited to, marked crosswalks, count-down signal timers, curb extensions, channelization islands, speed tables, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, and traffic circles or mini-circles.

3. Expand the existing local bus network in the Planning Area by a minimum of 25 percent by adding or modifying bus routes to increase accessibility to the Valley Link station at Isabel Avenue

4. Require all new development to install indoor water efficient appliances and fixtures to achieve a minimum of 15 percent reduction in water usage and require applicants for new development to submit landscape and irrigation plans capable of achieving a minimum of 10 percent reduction in outdoor water usage. The percent reductions should be achieved over baseline water use conditions in the City at the time of development.

EXHIBIT B
1106

5. Require a minimum solid waste diversion rate of 85 percent to be achieved by 2040.

6. Require employers with more than 50 employees to provide a suite of travel demand reduction measures (TDM) capable of reducing single-vehicle trips by at least 20 percent compared to normal trip generation rates.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
The project would not involve construction equipment or material that was not accounted for in the original project, as the Isabel Crossing Project would require less structural construction activities on the Isabel Crossing Parcels because of the proposed reduction of 39 housing units and 92,823 commercial square footage compared to the 2020 SEIR. Future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in a net increase of residential units and net decrease in office/commercial space; however, overall development would not exceed the intensity of development planned in the INSP. Therefore, no new or more severe GHG emissions impacts beyond what was analyzed in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR for the original project would result from construction of the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project.

GHG emissions were modeled for the Isabel Crossing Project and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project separately, in order to show the net change with the currently proposed development on the Isabel Crossing Parcels as well as to show the net change associated with the overall land use modifications that would be applied under the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project. It should be noted that the net change associated with the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project takes into consideration the unit shortfall associated with the Isabel Crossing Project, in addition to the unit shortfall associated with other existing and planned development in the INSP area.

Isabel Crossing Project
Operational GHG emissions modeled for the Isabel Crossing Project include mobile source emissions, energy emissions, area emissions, refrigerant emissions, water and waste emissions.

Mobile source emissions are based on Kittelson & Associates total daily VMT estimate for the Isabel Crossing Project and for development originally planned for the Isabel Crossing Parcels under the INSP, included under Section 4.17, Transportation, below (Kittelson & Associates 2024). The Isabel Crossing Project’s CalEEMod model uses default CalEEMod assumptions for area, energy, wastewater, solid waste, and refrigerant for the proposed land uses. As shown in Table 3, the Isabel Crossing Project would decrease operational GHG emissions compared with the original project.

Operational GHG emissions would decrease because there would be fewer commercial retail spaces and no office land use. Therefore, the Isabel Crossing Project would result in less energy

EXHIBIT B
1107
consumption and a decrease in vehicle miles traveled, resulting in a reduction in mobile-and energy source GHG emissions.

In addition, the residential population would decrease with the incorporation of the Isabel Crossing Project, which would decrease area, water, and waste sources GHG emissions compared to the development originally planned for the Isabel Crossing Parcels. As shown in Table 3 below, the Isabel Crossing Project would generate less GHG emissions compared to the development planned under the INSP for the Isabel Crossing Parcels. However, similar to the original project, the Isabel Crossing Project without mitigation would exceed the 2020 SEIR 2040 “Substantial Progress” Efficiency Metric. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant.

Table 3 Combined Annual Emissions for the Isabel Crossing Project – Unmitigated Emission Source
2040 with
Original Project
2040 with
Proposed Project
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e)
Operational
Mobile 23,949 20,377
Area 88 84
Energy 2,258 1,113
Water 142 103
Waste 372 327
Refrigerant 2 2
Total 26,810 22,005
Service Population
Residents 3,956 3,703
Jobs 904 358
Service Population 4,860 4,061
Net Emissions
Original Project Net Emissions Over Existing (for entire INSP) 52,230 Isabel Crossing Project Net Emissions (Original vs Project Emissions) (for the Isabel Crossing Parcels)
(4,805)
2020 SEIR Buildout Net Emissions With Isabel Crossing Project (for entire INSP)
45,795
Original Project Net Service Population (for entire INSP) 22,329 Net Service Population (Original Project vs Isabel Crossing Project Service Population) (for entire INSP)
21,530
Modified New 2020 SEIR Buildout Net Emissions per Net Service Population 2.1 2040 “Substantial Progress” Efficiency Metric 1.7
Exceed Threshold? Yes
MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
Notes: Parenthetical values are negative numbers and are subtracted from the total emissions rather than added.

Source: See Appendix B for the CalEEMod worksheets

EXHIBIT B
1108
Mitigation Measure GHG-1 (provided above) from the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR requires GHG reduction measures such as traffic calming, affordable housing, transit improvements, water conservation, and solid waste recycling and diversion. As shown in Table 4, the proposed Isabel Crossing Project, with mitigation incorporated, would be below the 2040 “Substantial Progress” efficiency metric in page 3.3-36 of the 2020 SEIR. Therefore, similar to the original project, the Isabel Crossing Project would result in GHG emissions that are less than the efficiency metric, and would result in less than significant GHG impact. The Isabel Crossing Project would result in no new or more severe impacts related to GHG emissions beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the Isabel Crossing Parcels.

Table 4 Combined Annual Emissions for the Isabel Crossing Project - Mitigated Emission Source
2040 with
Original Project
2040 with
Proposed Project
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e)
Operational
Mobile 23,949 20,377
Area 88 84
Energy 2,258 1,113
Water 121 87
Waste 56 49
Refrigerant 2 2
Total 26,473 21,712
Net Emissions
Original Project Net Mitigated Emissions Over Existing 3,722 Isabel Crossing Project Net Mitigated Emissions (Original vs Project Emissions) (4,761) 2020 SEIR Buildout Mitigated Emissions Minus Isabel Crossing Project Net Mitigated Emissions
(1,039)
Net Service Population (2020 SEIR vs Net Isabel Crossing Project Service Population)
21,530
Modified 2020 SEIR Buildout Net Emissions per Net Service Population (0.1) 2040 “Substantial Progress” Efficiency Metric 1.7
Exceed Threshold? No
MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
Notes: Parenthetical values are negative numbers and are subtracted from the total emissions rather than added.

Source: See Appendix B for the CalEEMod worksheets
No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project
The modeled operational GHG emissions for the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project include emissions from mobile sources, energy use, area emissions, refrigerants, water, and waste.

The mobile source emissions are based on trip generation rates provided by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. for low-rise apartments near rail transit, low-rise apartments not close to rail transit, and commercial office land use (Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2024). The modeling details described in Section 4.3, Air Quality, also apply to the GHG modeling. The CalEEMod model for the No Net Loss

EXHIBIT B
1109
Specific Plan Amendment Project uses default assumptions for area, energy, waste, solid waste, and refrigerant for the proposed land uses. Additionally, the GHG reduction measures outlined in Mitigation Measure GHG-1 from the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, such as traffic calming, affordable housing, transit improvements, water conservation, and solid waste recycling and diversion, were applied in the modeling.

As shown in Table 5, the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would reduce operational GHG emissions compared to development originally planned for the No Net Loss Parcels. The No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would lead to lower energy consumption and fewer total vehicle miles traveled, reducing mobile and energy source GHG emissions. Additionally, the increase in residential units under the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in lower water and waste source GHG emissions and increased area source emissions due to apartment fireplaces, as compared to development planned for the No Net Loss Parcels under the INSP. The No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project without mitigation would exceed the 2020 SEIR 2040 "Substantial Progress" Efficiency Metric.

Table 5 Combined Annual Emissions for the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project – Unmitigated
Emission Source
Original Project BART
and Comcast Parcels:

Commercial Use
(Decrease of 1,531,486 sf
of Office Space)
Proposed Project BART
and Comcast Parcels:

Residential Use
(Increase of 1,431
Residential Units)
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e)
Operational
Mobile (14,986) 8,702
Area (22) 91
Energy (4,965) 2,021
Water (535) 100
Waste (445) 330
Refrigerant (1) 2
Total (20,953) 11,246
Service Population
Residents - 4,0782
Jobs (5,304)1-
Service Population (5,304) 4,078
Net Emissions
Original Project Net Emissions Over Existing (for entire INSP) 52,230 No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Net Mitigated Emissions (Commercial vs Residential Emissions)
(9,707)
2020 SEIR Buildout Mitigated Emissions Minus No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Net Mitigated Emissions 42,523
Original Project Net Service Population (for entire INSP) 22,329

EXHIBIT B
1110
Emission Source
Original Project BART
and Comcast Parcels:

Commercial Use
(Decrease of 1,531,486 sf
of Office Space)
Proposed Project BART
and Comcast Parcels:

Residential Use
(Increase of 1,431
Residential Units)
Net Service Population (Original Project vs No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project) (for entire INSP)3
21,103
No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Buildout Net Emissions per Net Service Population

2.0 2040 “Substantial Progress” Efficiency Metric 1.7
Exceed Threshold? Yes
MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; sf = square feet Notes: Parenthetical values are negative numbers and are subtracted from the total emissions rather than added. 1Based on the 2020 SEIR, 2,104,200 square feet of non-residential square feet would generate 9,200 jobs, or 288.7 square feet per job. 2Based on 2020 SEIR, stated that Livermore’s projected household size for development through 2040 would be 2.85 persons per household
3No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project net service population = 4,078 – 5,304 = (1,226).

Source: Appendix B
As shown in Table 6, which includes implementation of the required Mitigation Measure GHG-1 from the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in GHG emissions below the 2040 "Substantial Progress" efficiency target identified in the 2020 SEIR.

Therefore, the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would not lead to new or more severe impacts related to GHG emissions beyond those that were identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the No Net Loss Parcels.

Table 6 Combined Annual Emissions for the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project – Mitigated
Emission Source
Original Project BART
and Comcast Parcels:

Commercial Use
(Decrease of 1,531,486
sf of Office Space)
No Net Loss Specific
Plan Amendment
Project BART and
Comcast Parcels:

Residential Use
(Increase of 1,431
Residential Units)
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e)
Operational
Mobile (14.986) 8,204
Area (22) 91
Energy (4,965) 2,021
Water (455) 85
Waste (67) 50
Refrigerant (1) 2
Total (20,495) 10,453

EXHIBIT B
1111
Emission Source
Original Project BART
and Comcast Parcels:

Commercial Use
(Decrease of 1,531,486
sf of Office Space)
No Net Loss Specific
Plan Amendment
Project BART and
Comcast Parcels:

Residential Use
(Increase of 1,431
Residential Units)
Net Emissions
Original Project Net Mitigated Emissions Over Existing 3,722 No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Net Mitigated Emissions (Commercial vs Residential Emissions)
(10,042)
2020 SEIR Buildout Mitigated Emissions Minus No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Net Mitigated Emissions (6,320)
Net Service Population (2020 SEIR vs No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Service Population)
21,103
No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project Buildout Net Emissions per Net Service Population
(0.3)
2040 “Substantial Progress” Efficiency Metric 1.7
Exceed Threshold? No
MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; sf = square feet Notes: Parenthetical values are negative numbers and are subtracted from the total emissions rather than added.

Source: Appendix B
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Two plans have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions in Livermore and at the State level, including CARB’s Scoping Plan and the City of Livermore CAP. The 2017 Scoping Plan and City of Livermore CAP adopted in 2012 were the latest GHG reduction plans analyzed in the 2020 SEIR; therefore, the proposed project is also compared to those plans. Similar to the original project, the proposed project would be required to comply with applicable State and local energy efficiency, renewable energy, green building, water conservation, and solid waste diversion requirements for new development. The proposed project would be required to comply with the policies in the INSP that encourage increased water conservation, solid waste diversion, renewable energy production, bicycle and pedestrian trips, and carpooling. In addition, development facilitated by the proposed project would include mixed-use land uses and development on the Isabel Crossing Parcels and BART Parcel would be located near transit. As shown in Table 3 and Table 6, the proposed project would emit less GHG emissions compared to the original project. Therefore, the proposed project would have no new or more severe impacts related to GHG emissions beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1112
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1113

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to
the public or the
environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
Pages 3.8-17
through 3.8-18
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Create a significant hazard to
the public or the
environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions
involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
c. Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within

0.25 mile of an existing or
proposed school?

Page 3 ends

through 3.8-19
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
d. Be located on a site that is
included on a list of
hazardous material sites
compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment?
Pages 3.8-19 in
the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
e. For a project located in an
airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the
project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in
the project area?
Pages 3.8-20
through 3.8-21
in the 2018 EIR

Page 3 ends

the 2020 SEIR
No No N/A

EXHIBIT B
1114
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
f. Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency
evacuation plan?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
g. Expose people or structures,
either directly or indirectly,
to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death involving
wildland fires?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to hazards and hazardous materials were analyzed on pages 3.8-17 through 3.8-23 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to hazards and hazardous materials from the 2018 EIR. Impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials were determined to be less than significant and the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR determined there would be no impact regarding safety of people residing or working within the vicinity of an airstrip.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
The 2018 EIR found that the INSP would result in new housing units, mixed-use facilities, commercial uses, and industrial space. The 2018 EIR determined that with implementation of existing federal, State, and local programs and regulations, impacts regarding the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant. The 2018 EIR found that while risks of upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment cannot be completely eliminated, they can be reduced to a manageable level. The 2018 EIR determined that with implementation of existing federal, State, and local programs and regulations, impacts regarding upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1115
The Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are entirely within the INSP Planning Area evaluated under the 2018 EIR and would consist of operational uses similar to those planned for the original project. Compliance with regulations pertaining to the routine transport, handling, and disposal of hazardous materials would be mandatory and would minimize impacts of upset or hazards.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school? The 2018 EIR found that there are no active, existing schools within one-quarter mile of the INSP planning area. However, there is an overlay in the INSP Planning Area designating zones for K-12 school uses. The INSP includes goals and policies G-PF-3, P-PF-25, P-PF-26, and P-PF-27 to minimize the exposure of new development in the INSP Planning Area to hazardous materials which would reduce potential impacts to schools to a less than significant level.

The Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are not located within 0.25 miles of the K-12 school overlays described in the 2018 EIR. As shown in Figure 2, land uses planned for the area south of the Isabel Crossing and BART Parcels immediately across the I-580 include education/institutional uses.

This designation allows a range of uses including schools, transit facilities, public and private meeting facilities, park and recreation areas, administrative and professional offices, and research laboratories (City of Livermore 2020a). While this area is less than 0.25 miles from the Isabel Crossing Parcels and the BART Parcel, INSP goals and policies to minimize the exposure of new development in the INSP Planning Area to hazardous materials would apply to the project. The Comcast Parcels are located approximately 0.15 mile east of school overlay parcels, across Independence Drive. Similar to the Isabel Crossing and BART Parcels, while this area is less than 0.25 mile from the Comcast Parcels, INSP goals and policies to minimize the exposure of new development in the INSP Planning Area to hazardous materials would apply to the project.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
The 2018 EIR found that there are three sites in the INSP Planning Area that are included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and five permitted underground storage tanks. However, all three of the hazardous materials sites cases are closed, representing a low to moderate risk of encountering impact during potential future redevelopment. The 2018 EIR found that future construction activities associated with implementation of the plan may also generate hazardous materials and waste, such as fuels and oils from construction equipment and vehicles; however, compliance with applicable policies, regulations, and programs would reduce the impact to less than significant.

The Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are not located on or adjacent to any of the three sites identified in the 2018 EIR or the permitted underground storage tank sites. No new open hazardous materials sites have been identified on the Isabel Crossing or No Net Loss Parcels since the 2018 EIR (State Water Resources Control Board 2023; California Department of Toxic Substances Control 2023). The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable policies, regulations, and

EXHIBIT B
1116
programs to reduce impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project. e. For a project located in an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The 2018 EIR found that the INSP exempts development in the INSP Planning Area from a City Development Code policy limiting building height to 40 feet within 5,000 feet of an airport runway; however, new development under the INSP would be subject to ALUCP height limits and regulations on airspace protection, in addition to scenic view and land use compatibility factors. Therefore, environmental impacts from this amendment would not be significant. The 2018 EIR also determined that INSP would be consistent with the ALUCP to prevent safety hazards for people residing and working in the Planning Area near the Livermore Municipal Airport. The 2020 SEIR determined that the INSP does not propose any elements that would affect the established flight patterns for the Livermore Airport as the Plan is consistent with the ALUCP and federal aviation regulations on height and safety, therefore, the impact on flight patterns would be less than significant.

As discussed in Section 4.1, Aesthetics, some of the proposed buildings on the Isabel Crossing Parcels would exceed heights under the INSP scenic view requirements; however, several of the proposed building heights would be reduced compared to the original project, and these changes would be consistent with the INSP land uses with concessions and waivers approved under the State Density Bonus. Future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to comply with the height requirements set forth in the INSP. The proposed project would continue to be subject to ALUCP height limits and regulations on airspace protection. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The 2018 EIR determined that development facilitated by the INSP would result in new development and population growth, resulting in an increase in demand for emergency services, which could affect implementation of the Alameda Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and the Tri-Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan; however, with implementation of existing local programs and regulations, impacts would be less than significant.

The project site is located within the INSP Planning Area and would not exceed the overall buildout potential of the original project. As discussed in Section 4.17, Transportation, a Technical Memorandum prepared by Kittelson and Associates in May 2024 (Appendix E) conducted VMT analysis for the Isabel Crossing Project and determined overall VMT would be lower compared with the original project proposed at the Isabel Crossing Parcels. A subsequent analysis prepared by Kittelson and Associates in June 2024 (Appendix E) determined that determined that fewer daily trips and less total VMT would be generated by anticipated future development of the No Net Loss Parcels compared to development planned under the INSP. Therefore, traffic impacts during an emergency or evacuation event would not exceed those considered for the original project and no revisions to the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR would be required. Similar to the original project, the proposed project would be required to comply with existing regulations, and policies in the Livermore General Plan including Policy P3 which requires residential, commercial, and industrial

EXHIBIT B
1117
areas to provide efficient and safe access for emergency vehicles, to reduce the potential to interference with adopted emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
The 2018 EIR found that while the City of Livermore has identified high wildfire severity zones in the INSP Planning Area, none of the INSP Planning Area constitutes a very high fire hazard severity zone and development would be consistent with Livermore’s Fire Code and Chapter 9, Fire Protection Systems, of the California Building Code, which requires improvements such as fire sprinkler systems and fire alarms. The 2018 EIR determined that with implementation of existing State and local programs and regulations as well as the policies of the INSP, impacts would be less than significant.

The Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are entirely within the Planning Area studied in the 2018 EIR for the INSP and is not located in a fire hazard severity zone. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1118
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1119

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface
or ground water quality?
Pages 3.9-19
through 3.9-23
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
Pages 3.9-23
through 3.9-24
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
c. Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including
through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river or
through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:
(i) Result in substantial
erosion or siltation onor off-site
Pages 3.9-25
through 3.9-26
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
(ii) Substantially increase
the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a
manner which would
result in flooding on- or
off-site

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
(iii) Create or contribute
runoff water which
would exceed the
capacity of existing or
planned stormwater
drainage systems or
provide substantial
additional sources of
polluted runoff
Pages 3.9-26
through 3.9-28
in the 2018 EIR
No No Yes
(iv) Impede or redirect flood
flows?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A

EXHIBIT B
1120
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or
seiche zones, risk release of
pollutants due to project
inundation?
Pages 3.9-29
through 3.9-30
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
e. Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water
quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater
management plan?
Pages 3.9-23
through 3.9-24
in the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to hydrology and water quality were analyzed on pages 3.9-19 through 3.9-30 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to hydrology and water quality from the 2018 EIR. Hydrology and water quality impacts regarding water quality and groundwater recharge were determined to be less than significant, while impacts related to stormwater runoff capacity were determined to be less than significant with mitigation and adherence to INSP policies P-PF-39 and P-PF-42, and it was determined that there would be no impact regarding exposing people to flood hazards or the project resulting in seiche, tsunami, or mudflow.

The following describes the analysis included In the 2018 EIR and provides a review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to the project or the parcels on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in a previous environmental documents as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not previously discussed in the previous environmental documents; and 4) are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the previous environmental documents due to substantial new information.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The 2018 EIR determined that future specific projects would be required to comply with, at a minimum, the Clean Water Act, the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (PorterCologne Act), the San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) Water Quality Control Plan, and all INSP policies intended to avoid or minimize increases in stormwater flows and the associated degradation of water quality. Projects that disturb one or more acre of ground surface require a Construction General Permit which requires development and implementation of a SWPPP, which includes BMPs to eliminate or reduce stormwater and other discharge from construction sites and

EXHIBIT B
1121
ensure that water quality is not degraded. Projects would be required to comply with NPDES requirements during construction and would be designed in accordance with the Phase I MS4 Permit, Provision C.3.c, for post-construction stormwater management. Compliance with waste discharge requirements and dewatering regulations would ensure that dewatering activities are monitored and treated as required and that no violations of any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur. The 2018 EIR determined that compliance with all construction and design related stormwater regulatory requirements, the projects implemented under the INSP would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff and impacts would be less than significant.

The 2018 EIR determined that individual projects implemented under the INSP would be required to implement hydromodification BMPs to reduce the volume of runoff, include stormwater management measures as part of the design, and conform to INSP guidelines including stormwater runoff reduction and capture measures. The 2018 EIR found that with adherence to these requirements, development under the INSP would not change impervious surface area such that infiltration of groundwater would be affected. The 2018 EIR also found that water demand from the INSP would be accommodated by current water sources and impacts related to groundwater recharge would be less than significant.

The project site is located within the INSP Planning Area studied in the 2018 EIR for the INSP and would not exceed the buildout planned for the INSP. As discussed in Section 4.19, Utilities and Service Systems, water demand for the proposed Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would be greater than the original project (Appendix F). The project would result an increase in water demand of approximately 134,514 gallons per day (GPD) and the reduction in office space would result in a decrease in approximately 32,030 GPD for a net water demand increase of approximately 102,484 GPD, or 115 acre-feet per year (AFY) compared with planned development under the INSP. The net water demand would comprise approximately 5.7 percent of the 2020 remaining water supply (Cal Water 2021). This additional demand would not be substantial and could be accommodated by the districts’ existing water supply sources (Appendix F).

Thus, no new or additional water infrastructure or water supply resources would be required.

The level of ground disturbance for the proposed Isabel Crossing Project and potential future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be similar to that of the original project; therefore, impacts on groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge would be similar to the impacts determined for the original project. The proposed Isabel Crossing Project and future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would introduce new impervious surfaces such as roads and driveways which would increase surface runoff; however, new impervious surfaces from proposed development on the project site would not exceed those of development accounted for under the original project in the 2018 EIR. The proposed project would not introduce land uses that would increase the sources of polluted runoff compared to the original project. While the proposed project changes the land use compared with the original project, it would not introduce entirely new types of land use that are not already considered in the 2018 EIR for the original project and would not introduce new types of pollutants compared with the original project. Like the original project, construction and design related stormwater regulatory requirements, hydromodification BMPs, INSP policies and guidelines, and other federal, state and local regulations would apply to the proposed project, which would ensure compliance with the applicable Water Quality Control Plan (San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan) and Zone 7 Alternative Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1122
c. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or situation on- or off-site? ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? The 2018 EIR determined that with adherence to regulatory requirements and implementation of the policies and associated design guidelines contained in the INSP, future development within the INSP Planning Area would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site. The 2018 EIR determined that with the application of the Phase I MS4 Permit, projects implemented within the INSP Planning Area would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off site. Therefore, the 2018 EIR determined impacts would be less than significant related to erosion and siltation and on or off-site flooding. The 2018 EIR determined that projects that would create one acre or more of new impervious surface would be required to analyze the project runoff and provide on-site or regional BMPs to reduce the runoff rate. The 2018 EIR determined that with compliance with INSP Policies, P-PF-39, P- PF-42, P-ENV-33, and NPDES requirements, Phase I MS4 Permit, Provision C.3.c, for post-construction stormwater management including Low Impact Development (LID) impacts related to the potential to exceed stormwater drainage systems would be less than significant.

The proposed project would not involve work within surface waters, including streams or rivers.

Total construction area and depth of excavation would not be substantially increased compared with that considered for the original project. The Isabel Crossing Project and future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would introduce new impervious surfaces such as roads and driveways which would increase surface runoff; however, new impervious surfaces from proposed development on the project site would not exceed those of development accounted for under the original project in the 2018 EIR. As described in the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would be required to implement BMPs to reduce the runoff rate, since it would create more than one acre of new impervious surfaces. The proposed Isabel Crossing Project would use biotreatment areas, onsite pervious pavers, on-site biotreatment and flowthrough planers, and a detention vault. Future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be expected to install similar stormwater features.

Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed project would not increase potential for substantial erosion compared to the original project.

The proposed project would not introduce land uses that would increase the sources of polluted runoff compared to the original project. While the proposed project changes the land use compared with the original project, it would not introduce entirely new types of land use that are not already considered in the 2018 EIR for the original project and would not introduce new types of pollutants compared with the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1123
c. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
The 2018 EIR found that while some portions of the INSP Planning Area are in 100-year flood hazard areas, impacts related to development within flood zones would be less than significant. The 2018 EIR found that the INSP Planning Area is not in a dam inundation area, and that there would be no impacts related to the risk of the failure of levees or dams; seiche; tsunami; or mudflow.

While the proposed project changes the land use compared with the original project, the proposed project would not introduce land uses or features that would alter the drainage pattern of the site or area more than under the original project. Similarly, the proposed project would not increase the amount of impervious surfaces beyond that of the original project. The proposed Isabel Crossing Project would include biotreatment areas, on-site pervious pavers, on-site biotreatment and flowthrough planters, and a detention vault. Similar to the original project, the proposed Isabel Crossing Project and future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be subject to Plan Policy P-ENV-33, which requires preparation of a drainage study.

The project site is located within the INSP Planning Area studied in the 2018 EIR for the INSP. The Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Hazard Layer Map shows that the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels are located in Flood Zone X, which is an area of minimal flood hazard (Federal Emergency Management Agency 2009). Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1124
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1125

4.11 Land Use and Planning
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an
established community?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Cause a significant
environmental impact due to
a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?

Page 3 ends

through 3.1-25
of the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to land use and planning were analyzed on pages 3.1-16 through 3.1-25 of the 2018 EIR.

The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to land use and planning. Impacts regarding the potential to divide an established community were determined to be less than significant and impacts regarding the potential to conflict with land use plans, policies, and regulations for avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact would be less than significant with the implementation of INSP goals and policies.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project physically divide an established community? The 2018 EIR determined that the INSP would not divide an established community, and impacts would be less than significant. The project site would be entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR and would not exceed development considered in the 2018 EIR or introduce new features that would divide an established community. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts related to dividing established communities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

EXHIBIT B
1126
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
The 2018 EIR found that since the INSP would replace existing General Plan and zoning standards in the planning area, the General Plan and Development Code would be amended to accommodate development resulting from implementing the INSP, the INSP helps fulfill existing General Plan goals, and the INSP does not conflict with other applicable agencies’ plans, policies, or regulations, impacts would be less than significant.

The project site would be entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR and would not exceed development considered in the 2018 EIR. The Isabel Crossing Project proponent’s use of the State density bonus law would not conflict with the INSP, as this provision allows for the slight modification of land uses from established land us plans to increase the availability of affordable housing throughout the state. Although the general mix of uses would shift and office and commercial uses would be reduced, land uses would remain generally similar to those envisioned in the adopted INSP. The Isabel Crossing Project’s proposed Specific Plan Amendment would revise INSP Policies P-LU-8 and P-L-34 in a manner that allows the project to engage in master planning, which, under the amended INSP, would allow the averaging of densities and uses across the site, the assessment of INSP zoning and development standards based on proposed housing density and uses, the reconfiguration of site blocks, roads, and infrastructure elements, and alternative compliance with affordable housing requirements. In addition, the Isabel Crossing Project’s Density Bonus “waiver or reduction” requests enable relief from certain INSP development standards, including, among others, for height in four different areas. The proposed master site plan includes a concentration of tall buildings near Gateway Avenue, transitioning downward in scale along Portola Avenue. The combined target unit count for Subareas 3b and 3c in the INSP was 1,477 housing units and a minimum unit count of 1,236 units. The Isabel Crossing project would involve construction of 1,299 housing units, with taller buildings located near Gateway Avenue, and modification of the street network as shown in the INSP. These project features are consistent with INSP Policies P-LU-8 and P-LU-37, as proposed for amendment.

The proposed land use designation change for the BART parcel would allow for the construction of 913 units, which is greater than is currently allowed in Subarea 3a. Subarea 1d is designated as Business Park which allows commercial and light industrial uses. Residential uses are not currently permitted on the Comcast Parcels. The No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would amend the INSP to change the land use designation of the BART Parcel to Residential Core, and the Comcast Parcels to Village and Transition, to ensure that there is adequate opportunity for the development of housing within the INSP area. The project would also be required to comply with INSP goals, policies, and actions described in the 2018 EIR for the original project related to environmental mitigation. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts related to conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

EXHIBIT B
1127

4.12 Mineral Resources
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and
the residents of the state?

Page 3 ends

through 3.15-2
of the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Result in the loss of
availability of a locally
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a
local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?

Page 3 ends

through 3.15-2
of the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to mineral resources were analyzed on pages 3.15-1 through 3.15-2 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to mineral resources from the 2018 EIR.

The 2018 EIR determined there would be no impact to mineral resources.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? The 2018 EIR determined that the INSP Planning Area does not have known mineral resources of regional or statewide value, or locally-important mineral resource recovery sites that are delineated on a land use plan, therefore, the INSP would have no impact on mineral resources. The project site is entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR and would result in no new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

EXHIBIT B
1128
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1129

4.13 Noise
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Generate a substantial
temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of standards
established in the local
general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
Pages 3.6-20
through 3.6-34
and 3.6-38
through 3.6-39
of the 2018 EIR
Pages 3.4-18
through3.4-34
and 3.4-38
through 3.4-40
of the 2020
SEIR
No No No
b. Generate excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
Pages 3.6-34
through 3.4-38
of the 2018 EIR
Pages 3.4-34
through 3.4.38
of the 2020
SEIR
No No No
c. For a project located within
the vicinity of a private
airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, expose
people residing or working in
the project area to excessive
noise levels?
Pages 3.6-40
through 3.6-44
of the 2018 EIR
Pages 3.4-40
through 3.4-44
of the 2020
SEIR
No No No
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to noise were analyzed on pages 3.6-17 through 3.6-44 of the 2018 EIR and pages 3.4-16 through 3.4-44 of the 2020 SEIR. Noise impacts related to construction activities, stationary equipment, and airport noise were determined to be less than significant. Impacts related to traffic noise were determined to be significant and unavoidable despite implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 (included below). Impacts related to groundborne vibration from construction activities were determined to be significant and unavoidable, despite implementation of Policy PENV-6 of the INSP.

EXHIBIT B
1130
MM NOI-1 Implement Traffic NoiseReduction Measures at Existing SensitiveReceptors.

TheCity shall implement off-sitetrafficnoisereductionmeasuresalongthefollowingthree roadway segmentssuch that thePlan-related increasein traffic noisefor sensitive receptors is 3 dB orless:
▪ Portola, east of Tranquility Circle
▪ East Airway Boulevard east of Sutter Street and west of ViaMateo (around the mobile homedevelopment)
▪ East Airway Boulevard east of ViaMateo and West/North of PortolaAvenue (around the mobile home development)
Measuresthat can be implemented include, but are not limited to:
▪ Construction of solid barriers between the roadway and adjacent residential use; and ▪ Installation of “quiet” pavement, such as open-graded asphalt, along the area of the roadway adjacent toresidences.

TheCityshall prepareanoisecontrol plan for impacted existing land uses that identifies the location, design, and effectiveness of thespecific treatmentsto be implemented.

The following describes the analysis included in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, and provides a review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to the project or the parcels on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in a previous environmental documents as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not previously discussed in the previous environmental documents; and 4) are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the previous environmental documents due to substantial new information.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Noise-sensitive receptors closest to the Isabel Crossing Parcels include future residences currently under construction approximately 150 feet to the north across Portola Avenue and existing multifamily residences in the Montage multi-family residential neighborhood, located approximately 250 feet north of the project site on Dovecote Lane. Additional multi-family residences are located approximately 700 feet east on Tranquility Circle, and Cayetano Park approximately 540 feet northeast of the project site across Portola Avenue and Isabel Avenue.

Noise-sensitive receptors closest to the BART Parcel include residences located approximately 750 feet to the east on Tranquility Circle. Noise-sensitive receptors closest to the Comcast Parcels include residences located approximately 70 feet to the northeast on Copper Crest Common.

Construction
As described in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, construction activities associated with future projects and related construction noise impacts would be temporary. Each individual construction activity would have the potential to generate noise levels that could be in excess of applicable local

EXHIBIT B
1131
thresholds, or that could cause a disturbance to nearby noise-sensitive receptors. As stated in the 2020 SEIR, at 50 feet from the source, construction noise levels could potentially be above 80 dBA.

The City noise ordinance allows construction during daytime hours of Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and prohibits construction on Sundays and City-observed holidays. Development under the proposed project would be required to comply with these restrictions. As stated in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, construction that complies with the time-of-day restrictions for construction activities would result in less than significant noise impacts with regard to the generation of noise in excess of thresholds. Therefore, as the Isabel Crossing Project and future development of the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to comply with the hourly restrictions for construction activities, this impact would not be more severe than identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR.

Operation
The primary on-site operational noise source from the project would be HVAC units on each of the proposed buildings within the Isabel Crossing Parcels. According to the site plans provided by William Hezmalhalch Architects for the Isabel Crossing Project (WHA 2023; Appendix A), the closest sensitive receptor to a potential HVAC unit would be approximately 150 feet north across Portola Avenue. Specific planning data for the future HVAC systems, including any that may be proposed with development on the No Net Loss Parcels, are not available at this stage of project design. The development of new residences could result in the exposure of existing residential land uses to noise that exceeds the City’s noise standards.

Future development under the project would be required to comply with policies included in the City’s General Plan that would help reduce noise effects to surrounding sensitive receptors.

Pursuant to the City’s General Plan Objective N-1.5, Policy P1, project impacts would be significant if exterior noise levels exceed 55 dBA L50 at a residential property during the hours of 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. and 45 dBA L50 during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Conservatively assuming that HVAC units would be running 24 hours each day, the project would be required to comply with the City of Livermore’s nighttime exterior noise policy of 45 dBA L50.

However, even with General Plan Objective N-1.5, Policy P1, it is possible that noise levels from HVAC could result in potentially significant noise at adjacent noise-sensitive residential receptors.

Implementation of Policy P-ENV-7 would reduce noise impacts from HVAC to less than significant levels. Therefore, this impact would not be more severe than those identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR.

Special Events
As discussed in the 2020 SEIR, the project would include the development of parks and plazas which could be used for gatherings or events. The types of potential events that could occur at proposed or future parks and plazas within the project site are not known at this time, so it is not possible to estimate potential temporary or periodic noise generated by gatherings in these areas. However, all special events would be required to obtain a special event permit in accordance with the City of Livermore rules. To obtain a permit, event organizers must be certain that all even activities comply with the local laws applicable to noise abatement (City of Livermore 2017). Any special event in the City would need to obtain a special event permit in accordance with the City of Livermore rules.

Therefore, noise impacts related to special events occurring at the project site would not be more severe than those identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR.

EXHIBIT B
1132
Traffic
The proposed project would involve construction of 1,431 greater residential units than the original project. This increase in residential units would balance out with the decrease in commercial and office space, resulting in a corresponding net reduction in total daily vehicle trips to and from the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Parcels (Appendix E). Because the project would result in a net decrease in daily vehicle trips, the project would not result in a significant traffic noise increase and this impact would not be more severe than those identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. b. Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? The 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR determined that construction groundborne vibration would be significant. Operation of the proposed and future residential development projects would not include substantial vibration sources. Thus, construction activities have the greatest potential to generate groundborne vibration affecting nearby sensitive receptors. Construction equipment would be consistent with that analyzed in the 2020 SEIR. Therefore, construction activities known to generate excessive groundborne vibration, such as pile driving, may be required for project construction. INSP Policy P-ENV-6 would help reduce construction vibration effects at sensitive land uses by requiring the project developer to implement measures to reduce vibration. Such measures could include: operating heavy equipment as far as practical from residential uses; using smaller bulldozers (operating weight less than 20,000 pounds) when grading must occur within approximately 50 feet of residential uses or other vibration sensitive uses; and using quiet pile driving technology when feasible.

For purposes of this analysis, the greatest anticipated source of vibration during general project construction activities would be from an impact pile driver, which could be used within 70 feet from the nearest residential building, located northeast of the Comcast Parcels, and 40 feet from the nearest industrial/commercial building, located west of the Comcast Parcels. As stated in the 2020 SEIR, vibration impacts would be significant if they would exceed 0.5 in/sec PPV (Caltrans 2013) at the new residential buildings and the modern industrial/commercial buildings which is the level at which structural damage may occur. At a distance of 40 feet, an impact pile driver would typically create approximately 0.384 PPV (in/sec) at the existing commercial buildings, and at a distance of 70 feet, an impact pile driver would create approximately 0.208 PPV (in/sec) at the existing residential buildings (Federal Transportation Administration 2018). This would not exceed the architectural damage criterion for new residential buildings and modern industrial/commercial buildings of

0.5 PPV (in/sec) and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, construction vibration impacts resulting from use of an impact pile driver within 40 feet of the nearest industrial/commercial building and within 70 feet of the nearest residential building would be less severe than those identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. c. Would the project be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, and expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The project site is located approximately 0.5 mile northeast of the closest public airport, the Livermore Municipal Airport. As stated in the Livermore Executive Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (City of Livermore 2012), all project parcels are located inside the Airport Protection Area and Influence Area, and outside the limit of any noise contour. Therefore, no substantial noise exposure from airport noise would occur to people residing or working in the

EXHIBIT B
1133
project area, and impacts would not be more severe than those identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR.

Additionally, the project site is located approximately 6.3 miles northwest of the closest private airport, Meadowlark Field Airport. As stated in the 2020 SEIR, this small private airport has only six aircraft based at the field. At this distance, and based on the size of this airstrip, no substantial noise exposure from airport noise would occur to people residing or working in the project area, and impacts would not be more severe than those identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR.

EXHIBIT B
1134
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1135

4.14 Population and Housing
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area,
either directly (e.g., by
proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (e.g.,
through extension of roads
or other infrastructure)?

Page 3 ends

through Page

3.1-29 of the
2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Displace substantial numbers
of existing people or housing,
necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?

Page 3 ends

through Page

3.1-32 of the
2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to population and housing were analyzed on pages 3.1-25 through 3.1-32 of the 2018 EIR.

The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to population and housing from the 2018 EIR. Population and housing impacts regarding unplanned population growth were determined to be less than significant and impacts related to the displacement of people or housing would be less than significant with implementation of INSP goals and policies.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The 2018 EIR determined that direct inducement of population growth through new housing and businesses would not be considered a significant impact because development facilitated by the INSP would be within the overall General Plan capacity and would be paced as part of the City’s growth management program and the INSP phasing program. The 2018 EIR found that buildout of

EXHIBIT B
1136
the INSP would generate at least 20 percent subsidized housing units, which may serve people displaced from existing housing due to rising rents. The 2018 EIR determined that the INSP includes policies to reduce potential displacement and maximize affordable housing options that build upon existing City programs and policies, therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

As described in Section 1.5, Project Description, the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in a net increase of 1,431 residential units beyond the total residential buildout in the adopted INSP. The project would also result in a net decrease of 1,531,486 square feet of office and commercial space compared to the adopted INSP. Livermore’s average household size for development is 2.6 persons per household (California Department of Finance [DOF] 2024). Using this estimate, the population increase facilitated by the proposed project would be approximately 3,720 residents beyond the original project. INSP goals and policies described for the original project in the 2018 EIR would continue to apply for the modified project.

As described in the 2018 EIR, the City’s General Plan establishes an overall development capacity for the city of 41,000 residential units and 9,100 new jobs. Of the total 41,000 residential units anticipated by the General Plan, 4,500 units were associated with an anticipated new BART station.

The proposed project would result in 1,431 residential units beyond those considered in the INSP EIR, which would exceed the anticipated growth for the BART station area. However, at this time, only the Isabel Crossing Parcels are proposed for project-specific development. The No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would allow the BART and Comcast Parcels to be developed with residential uses at a later date. As described in the INSP EIR, the INSP includes growth management strategies to ensure there is adequate public infrastructure and services through the allocation of residential units to development projects at the entitlement phase. Additionally, it should be noted that the City has observed a shortfall in housing unit production in the INSP area from existing and proposed development projects, resulting in a unit shortfall which the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project is intended to address. Because the population increase facilitated by the proposed project would be subject to the INSP growth management strategies and is intended to address housing unit shortfalls currently experienced in the INSP area, the project would result in no new or more severe impacts related to population growth beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

Because there are no existing residences on the project site, the project would not displace housing or people. Therefore, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts to population and housing beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

EXHIBIT B
1137

4.15 Public Services
Where was Impact
Analyzed in the
EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or
physically altered
governmental facilities, or
the need for new or
physically altered
governmental facilities, the
construction of which could
cause significant
environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times
or other performance
objectives for any of the
public services:
1 Fire protection? Page 3.11-13 of
the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
2 Police protection? Page 3.11-13
through 3.11-15
of the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
3 Schools? Page 3.11-12
through 3.11-13
of the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
4 Parks? Page 3.11-8
through 3.11-12
of the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
5 Other public facilities? Page 3.11-15 of
the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to public services were analyzed on pages 3.11-13 through 3.11-15 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to public services from the 2018 EIR.

Impacts regarding the expansion of public services were determined to be less than significant with implementation of INSP policies.

EXHIBIT B
1138
impacts that were not previously discussed in the previous environmental documents; and 4) are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the previous environmental documents due to substantial new information.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:

1. Fire protection?

2. Police protection?

3. Schools?

4. Parks?

5. Other public facilities?
Fire Protection Services
According to the LPFD 2020 year-end report, the department had 121 full-time employees serving a population of 171,385 (LPFD 2021). This would yield a ratio of 0.71 firefighters per 1,000 residents.

The Isabel Crossing Project, as well as future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project, would be subject to INSP Policies P-PF-26 and P-PF-27, which require ongoing coordination between the City and the LPFD to ensure the adequate provision of fire protection services in the INSP area, as development occurs. As part of the ongoing coordination efforts, the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LFPD) has indicated there are increasing demands for fire protection services citywide, including within the INSP area. Separate from this project, the LPFD is preparing a comprehensive Community Risk Assessment report, anticipated to be completed mid-summer of 2024, that will further identify operational needs and provide recommendations to address future fire protection services citywide, including those in the INSP area. Consistent with the INSP policies cited above, the project would be subject to the recommendations of the Community Risk Assessment when completed.

Furthermore, the Isabel Crossing Project proponent would be required to pay fair share fees into the City’s Community Benefit Fund, which is intended to fund infrastructure improvements, such as necessary community service facility expansions or renovations. Future development of the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to make similar fair share payments. Additionally, the Isabel Crossing Project and future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would generate tax revenue during project operation, which includes contribution to the City’s

EXHIBIT B
1139
General Fund. Collectively, the project’s contributions to the General Fund, in addition to the Community Benefit Fund, would be used to ensure adequate services, facilities, and infrastructure are provided within the INSP area, including fire protection services. No new impacts or substantially increased impacts related to fire protection services would occur.

Police Services
According to the Livermore Police Department (LPD) 2022 annual report, there were a total of 97 police officers employed by LPD (LPD 2023). The DOF estimates that the 2022 population was 85,769. This yields a ratio of 1.13 officers per 1,000 people.

The additional residential units proposed for the Isabel Crossing Project and future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in an increase in population of approximately 3,720 persons beyond the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. This increase in population would result in a new ratio of 1.08 officers per 1,000 people. The decrease in office space would result in a reduced demand for police services, which would offset some of the increase in demand for police protection services from the increase in residential uses. The increase in demand for police services would not be substantial; the number of staff needed to offset this increase would be approximately four police officers. Although four new police officers may be required to serve the project, the increase in staff would not warrant construction of new or expanded police facilities. Furthermore, the Isabel Crossing Project proponent would be required to pay fair share fees into the City’s Community Benefit Fund, which is intended to fund infrastructure improvements, such as necessary community service facility expansions or renovations. Future development of the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to make similar fair share payments. No new impacts or substantially increased impacts related to police services would occur.

Schools
According to the 2019 Livermore Community Services and Infrastructure Report, the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District (LVJUSD) has a total school capacity of 16,150 students (City of Livermore 2020b). Census data shows that the 2022-23 enrollment total for LVJUSD was 12,956 students.

The additional residential units proposed for the Isabel Crossing Project and future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in approximately 600 new students in the LVJUSD beyond the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, for a total enrollment in LVJUSD of 13,556 students, or approximately 84 percent of the total school capacity of the LVJUSD. This would remain below LVJUSD’s total school capacity. No new impacts or substantially increased impacts related to schools would occur.

Parks
According to the Livermore General Plan, the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District’s (LARPD) standard for neighborhood parks is 2 acres per 1,000 residents or 1 park per 3,000 to 5,000 residents, for community parks is 2 acres per 1,000 residents, for regional parks is 15 acres per 1,000 residents, and for special use parks is 3 acres per 1,000 residents (City of Livermore 2004). The INSP includes 236.1 acres of combined parkland, including three new neighborhood parks, and a buildout population in the INSP Planning Area of 13,720 residents (City of Livermore 2018).

The additional residential units proposed for the Isabel Crossing Project and future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would generate a population of

EXHIBIT B
1140
approximately 3,720 people beyond the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, for a new INSP buildout population of 17,440 people. While this would exceed the 1 neighborhood park per 3,000 to 5,000 resident ratio, Policy P-PF-4 of the INSP requires individual developers to provide land and/or in lieu fees for the development of parks to maintain acceptable parks to resident ratios. Future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to satisfy this INSP requirement. No new impacts or substantially increased impacts related to parks would occur.

EXHIBIT B
1141

4.16 Recreation
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be
accelerated?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Include recreational facilities
or require the construction
or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on
the environment?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to recreation were analyzed on page 3.11-15 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to recreation from the 2018 EIR. Recreation impacts were determined to be less than significant.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The 2018 EIR determined that because new development is required to dedicate park and recreational facilities or pay in-lieu fees that are used to build and maintain parks and recreational facilities and INSP policies would reduce impacts, impacts related to the use and deterioration of neighborhood and regional parks would be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1142
The proposed Isabel Crossing project includes 2.56 acres of common open space, which is greater than the original project planned for the Isabel Crossing project site by 0.39 acres. This exceeds the Livermore Area Recreation and Parks District (LARPD) standard of 2 acres per 1,000 residents or 1 park per 3,000-5,000 residents which was considered in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

The additional residential units facilitated by the land use change proposed on the No Net Loss Parcels would generate a population of approximately 3,720 people beyond the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, for a new INSP buildout population of 17,440 people. While this would exceed the 1 neighborhood park per 3,000 to 5,000 resident ratio, Policy P-PF-4 of the INSP requires individual developers to provide land and/or in lieu fees for the development of parks to maintain acceptable parks to resident ratios. Future development on the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to satisfy this INSP requirement. No new impacts or substantially increased impacts related to parks would occur beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR.

EXHIBIT B
1143

4.17 Transportation
Where was Impact
Analyzed in the
EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan,
ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?

Page 3 ends

through 3.2- 46
of the 2018 EIR
Pages 3.2-31
through 3.2-51
of the 2020 SEIR
No No Yes
b. Conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3, subdivision (b)?
N/A No No N/A
c. Substantially increase
hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible use (e.g., farm
equipment)?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR

Page 3 ends

the 2020 SEIR
No No N/A
d. Result in inadequate
emergency access?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR

Page 3 ends

the 2020 SEIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to transportation were analyzed on pages 3.2-32 through 3.2-36 of the 2018 EIR and pages

3.2-31 through 3.2-74 of the 2020 SEIR. Impacts related to the potential for the INSP to conflict with a program, plan or ordinance addressing the circulation system were determined to be significant and unavoidable in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. Impacts related to hazards due to a geometric design feature or emergency access were determined to be less than significant in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR.

EXHIBIT B
1144
Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? The 2020 SEIR found that the INSP would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of North Livermore Avenue & Portola Avenue (#3) during the weekday PM peak hour under Cumulative 2040 Conditions and cause vehicular delay during the PM peak hour, which is operating below the LOS D standard, to increase by more than five seconds compared the no-project (15 seconds). The 2020 SEIR included a mitigation measure which consists of adding additional left turn lanes to the impacted intersection under 2040 conditions, which would require the widening of North Livermore Avenue and Portola Avenue. However, the 2020 SEIR determined that due to rightof-way constraints on both roads, the addition of new lanes would not be feasible, and impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

The Isabel Crossing Project would alter some aspects of the roadway system analyzed in the 2020 SEIR for the original project, including street locations and internal circulation within the Isabel Crossing Parcels. However, roadways for the Isabel Crossing Project and future roadways associated with development of the No Net Loss Parcels would be required to comply with City standards and would result in no new or substantially more severe impacts than those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project. The proposed project would be entirely within the Planning Area considered for the INSP in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. While the development pattern would be modified by the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project, intersection operations would not be substantially degraded with the proposed project, and no new or more severe impacts on roadway facilities would occur (Appendix E).

The Isabel Crossing Project would include pedestrian sidewalks and a multi-use trail for bicycles and pedestrians on the Isabel Crossing Parcels. Development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would similarly include bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as required by INSP policies P-TRA-1, P-TRA-3 through P-TRA-6, P-TRA-8, P-TRA-9, and P-TRA-11 through P-TRA-13, which require the provision of adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout the INSP area and as part of individual development projects. Therefore, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts on bicycle and pedestrian facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.

The proposed project would be on the same project site as the original project. Therefore, the proposed project would be in proximity to the same transit stops as the original project. As described under Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed project would result in more residents on the project site than the original project. Accordingly, there would be a corresponding increase in demand for transit. Development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would be required to satisfy INSP policies P-TRA-14 through P-TRA-19, P-TRA21, and P-TRA-22, which require improvements to existing and planned transit facilities throughout the INSP area and as part of individual development projects. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts on transit facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), which was added to the CEQA Guidelines in November 2018, defines acceptable criteria for analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. It states that land use

EXHIBIT B
1145
projects with vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact, and that projects that decrease VMT compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact.

While the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR did not address VMT as an impact metric pursuant to Senate Bill 743, analysis conducted by Kittelson & Associates Inc. directly compares the INSP VMT to proposed project VMT to disclose whether there would be additional total VMT or increased VMT metrics generated by the changes in the proposed project (Appendix E). VMT was modeled for the Isabel Crossing Project and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project separately, in order to show the net change with the currently proposed development on the Isabel Crossing Parcels as well as to show the net change associated with the overall land use modifications that would be applied under the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project. It should be noted that the net change associated with the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project takes into consideration the unit shortfall associated with the Isabel Crossing Project, in addition to the unit shortfall associated with other existing and planned development in the INSP area.

Isabel Crossing Project
Table 7 shows daily VMT calculations for the original project compared with the Isabel Crossing Project for residential, employment, and retail uses. Table 8 shows VMT per capita for the original project compared with the Isabel Crossing Project for residential and employment uses.

Table 7 VMT Analysis for Original Project Compared with Isabel Crossing Project (Total VMT)
Land Use Original Project Isabel Crossing Project Net Change in VMT Residential 126,704 87,620 -39,084
Employment 50,474 44,260 -6,214
Retail 235,940 193,155 -42,785
Source: Appendix E
Table 8 VMT Analysis for Original Project Compared with Isabel Crossing Project (VMT per Capita)
Land Use Original Project Isabel Crossing Project Net Change Residential 24.5 20.8 -3.7
Employment 12.7 13.4 +0.6
Source: Appendix E
Analysis by Kittelson & Associates Inc. concluded that the Isabel Crossing Project would result in a slight increase in VMT per employee compared with the original project due to the reduction in office land use by the Isabel Crossing Project; however, the total VMT for all land uses would be lower under the Isabel Crossing Project. The Isabel Crossing Project also would be within 0.5 miles of quality transit, like the original project, and would be required to adhere to transportation demand management measures associated with INSP Policies P-TRA-19 and P-TRA-24 described in the 2020 SEIR. Therefore, the Isabel Crossing Project would not increase VMT impacts compared to impacts analyzed in the 2020 SEIR. The Isabel Crossing Project would result in no new or more severe impacts to VMT beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1146
No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project
Table 9 shows the total daily VMT calculations for the original project compared with the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project for the entire INSP area.

Table 9 Daily VMT Analysis for Original Project Compared with No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project
No Project
(2013)
Original Project
(2040)
No Net Loss Specific Plan
Amendment Project
(2040)
Daily Vehicle Trips 57,730 112,183 104,657
Daily VMT 599,393 1,168,901 1,157,280
Service Population 14,671 36,273 35,328
VMT/Service Population 40.9 32.2 32.8
Source: Appendix E
Analysis by Kittelson & Associates Inc. concluded that the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in a slight increase in VMT per service population compared with the original project due updated VMT analysis methodology; however, the daily vehicle trips and total daily VMT would be lower under the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project. The BART Parcel also would be within 0.5 miles of quality transit, and future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would be required to adhere to transportation demand management measures associated with INSP Policies P-TRA-19 and P-TRA-24, described in the 2020 SEIR. Therefore, the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would not increase VMT impacts compared to impacts analyzed in the 2020 SEIR. The No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in no new or more severe impacts to VMT beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.

Because the Isabel Crossing Project and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would both result in less total VMT than the INSP as described in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, the proposed project as a whole would not result in a new or more severe impact to VMT beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR for the original project.
c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)? The 2020 SEIR determined that implementation of the INSP would increase traffic levels in the study area and introduce new intersections and traffic signals to the existing street system. However, these new roadways and traffic signals would be designed to City Design standards and therefore should not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use and impacts would be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1147
incompatible use would not exceed those considered for the original project and no revisions to the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR would be required.
d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? The 2020 SEIR determined that implementation of the INSP would increase traffic levels in the study area and introduce new intersections and traffic signals to the existing street system. However, these new roadways and traffic signals would be designed to City Design standards and therefore should not result in inadequate emergency access and impacts would be less than significant. The 2020 SEIR determined that new land uses would require additional emergency access to respond to emergencies, however, new roadways and intersections would be designed to City design standards that account for emergency access and impacts would be less than significant.

The Isabel Crossing Project would include internal circulation within the Isabel Crossing Parcels that is different from the original project. However, like the original project, roadways and traffic signals would be designed to City Design standards and therefore should not result in inadequate emergency access. Similarly, future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project that includes new roadways or traffic signals would similarly be required to meet City Design standards. The transportation analysis conducted by TJKM in May 2024 (Appendix E) for the Isabel Crossing Project determined that fewer trips would be produced by the Isabel Crossing Project compared to the original project on the Isabel Crossing Parcels. Similarly, the transportation analysis conducted by Kittelson in June 2024 (Appendix E) for the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project determined that fewer trips would be produced by future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project compared to the original project on the No Net Loss Parcels. Therefore, traffic impacts during an emergency or evacuation event would not exceed those considered for the original project and no revisions to the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR would be required.

EXHIBIT B
1148
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1149

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in a Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in
the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical
resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section
5020.1(k)?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1? In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of
the resource to a California
Native American tribe.

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to tribal cultural resources were analyzed on page 3.13-19 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to tribal cultural resources from the 2018 EIR.

Tribal cultural resources were determined to be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1150
Project-Specific Impacts
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in a Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
During preparation of the 2018 EIR, NAHC and seven Native American tribes were contacted, pursuant to AB 52 and SB 18. At the time the 2018 EIR was completed, no response had been received from the tribes. An updated sacred lands file search conducted for this project by the NAHC did not indicate the presence of additional Native American cultural resources within the planning area. The 2018 EIR determined that there would be no impact to tribal cultural resources within the planning area.

Pursuant to SB 18, the City reached out to tribes listed on the NAHC contact list. The Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation requested information about the project and environmental documents which the City provided via email, and the North Valley Yokuts Tribe requested information regarding the Sacred Lands File Search which the City provided via email. No tribes requested further consultation at the time of this report.

The proposed project would be located at the same project site as the original project, and would not exceed the level of ground disturbance or intensity of development considered in the INSP.

Therefore, the proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts regarding tribal cultural resources beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1151

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the
relocation or construction of
new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas,
or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could
cause significant
environmental effects?

Page 3 ends

through 3.10-
13 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A
b. Have sufficient water
supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably
foreseeable future
development during normal,
dry and multiple dry years?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
c. Result in a determination by
the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected
demand in addition to the
provider’s existing
commitments?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
d. Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?

Page 3 ends

through 3.10-
15 of the 2018
EIR
No No N/A
e. Comply with federal, state,
and local management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid
waste?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A

EXHIBIT B
1152
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to utilities and service systems were analyzed on pages 3.10-11 through 3.10-15 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to utilities and service systems from the 2018 EIR. Utilities and service systems impacts were determined to be less than significant.

Project-Specific Impacts
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
The 2018 EIR determined that the INSP would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage, solid waste, wastewater, or water facilities. The 2018 EIR determined that implementation of the INSP would not result in insufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or require expanded entitlements. The 2018 EIR determined that implementation of the INSP would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Board. The 2018 EIR determined that implementation of the INSP would not result in solid waste disposal needs that exceed the permitted landfill capacity serving the INSP planning area. The 2018 EIR determined that the INSP would be required to comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, therefore, the impacts would be less than significant.

The proposed project would be on the same project site as the original project and entirely within the INSP Planning Area analyzed in the 2018 EIR. As described under Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the Isabel Crossing and No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would result in a net increase of 1,431 residential units beyond the total residential buildout in the adopted INSP. The project would also result in a net decrease of 1,531,486 square feet of office and commercial space as compared to the adopted INSP.

EXHIBIT B
1153
Water
The 2020 Livermore Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) indicates adequate available water supply during all future year scenarios to meet anticipated water demands up to 10,128 AFY, with additional unused water supply available. The 2020 total water demand in the district was 9,571 AFY, with 2,003 AFY unused.

The project would result an increase in water demand of approximately 134,514 gallons per day (GPD) and the reduction in office space would result in a decrease in approximately 32,030 GPD for a net water demand of approximately 102,484 GPD, or 115 acre-feet per year (AFY) compared with planned development under the INSP. The net water demand would comprise approximately 5.7 percent of the 2020 remaining water supply (Cal Water 2021). This additional demand would not be substantial and could be accommodated by the districts’ existing water supply sources (Appendix F).

Thus, no new or additional water infrastructure or water supply resources would be required. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts or the need for new or expanded water facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

Wastewater
The Livermore Water Reclamation Plant has a capacity of 8.5 million GPD and as of 2020, treats 4 to 7 million GPD according to the 2020 Livermore UWMP (Cal Water 2021). The remaining capacity would be 1.5 million GPD.

Assuming that wastewater generation is approximately 80 percent of water demand due to system losses, the wastewater generation for development facilitated by the proposed project would be 82,987 GPD. The additional wastewater generated by development facilitated by the proposed project would represent approximately 5.5 percent of the remaining capacity, which would not be a substantial increase. Thus, no new or additional wastewater infrastructure would be required. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts or the need for new or expanded wastewater facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

Stormwater
As discussed in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed project would introduce new impervious surfaces, and would change the land use compared with the original project; however, the proposed project would not introduce new impervious surfaces that would exceed those considered in the 2018 EIR for the original project and would not introduce land uses or features that would substantially alter the drainage pattern of the site or area compared with the original project. The Isabel Crossing Project would include biotreatment areas, on-site pervious pavers, on-site biotreatment and flowthrough planters, and a detention vault. Future development facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would include similar features, as required by local and state stormwater regulations. Similar to the original project, the proposed project would be subject to regulations regarding stormwater including INSP Policy P-ENV-33, which requires preparation of a drainage study. The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts or the need for new or expanded stormwater facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1154
Solid Waste
According to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) waste characterization rates, the residential solid waste rate is 8.6 pounds per unit per day, and the office rate is 6 pounds per 1,000 square feet per day (CalRecycle 2024a).

The City of Livermore sends its waste to the Vasco Road Landfill and the Altamont Landfill. The Vasco Road Landfill has a maximum permitted throughput of 2,518 tons per day and a total remaining capacity of 11.6 million cubic yards, and the Altamont Landfill has a maximum permitted throughput of 11,150 tons per day and a total remaining capacity of 65.4 million cubic yards (CalRecycle 2024b, 2024c). This amounts to a total maximum daily throughput of 13,668 tons per day and a total remaining capacity of 77.0 million cubic yards across both landfills.

The Isabel Crossing Project would decrease residential units and commercial and office space compared to development originally planned for those parcels under the INSP, therefore, the Isabel Crossing Project would not result in new or more severe impacts or the need for new or expanded solid waste facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

The increase in solid waste generated by new residential uses facilitated by the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project would be approximately 12,307 pounds per day1 and the decrease in solid waste generation by the removal of office space from the No Net Loss Parcels would be approximately 9,188 pounds per day2for a net increase in solid waste generation from the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project of approximately 3,119 pounds per day (1.6 tons per day).

This equates to approximately 33 annual cubic yards of solid waste.

This increase in solid waste generation would be less than 0.02 percent of the maximum daily throughput and less than 0.001 percent of the total remaining capacity of the Vasco Road and Altamont Landfills. Thus, the current solid waste infrastructure would be adequate to accommodate the increased solid waste generation from the No Net Loss Specific Plan Amendment Project and no new or additional solid waste infrastructure would be required.

The proposed project would continue to be subject to applicable federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, including Chapter 8.08 of the LMC, like the original project.

The proposed project would result in no new or more severe impacts or the need for new or expanded solid waste facilities beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project. 1 1,431 residential units multiplied by 8.6 pounds per day. 2 1,531,486 square feet multiplied by 6 pounds per 1000 square feet per day.

EXHIBIT B
1155

4.20 Wildfire
Where was
Impact Analyzed
in the EIR?
Are Major
Revisions to the
EIR Required?
Are There New or
Substantially More
Severe Significant
Impacts?
Do EIR Mitigation
Measures
Address and/or
Resolve Impacts?
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a. Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an
adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
b. Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks and
thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled
spread of a wildfire?

N/A N/A N/A N/A
c. Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?

N/A N/A N/A N/A
d. Expose people or structures
to significant risks, including
downslopes or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire
slope instability, or drainage
changes?

Page 3 ends

the 2018 EIR
No No N/A
Analysis in Previous Environmental Documents
Impacts to wildfire were analyzed on pages 3.8-22 through 3.8 -23 of the 2018 EIR. The 2020 SEIR did not update or modify the analysis of impacts to wildfire from the 2018 EIR. Impacts regarding wildfire were determined to be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1156
Project-Specific Impacts
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The 2018 EIR determined that development facilitated by the INSP would result in new development and population growth, resulting in an increase in demand for emergency services, which could affect implementation of the Alameda Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and the Tri-Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan; however, with implementation of existing local programs and regulations, including the City’s existing General Plan’s Public Safety Element and Circulation Element, impacts would be less than significant.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map for Alameda County shows that none of the project parcels are not located in a State Responsibility Area or lands classified as Very High Fire Severity Zones (CAL FIRE 2022). The nearest State Responsibility Area is located approximately 0.11 mile west of the Comcast Parcels, 0.33 mile north of the Isabel Crossing Parcels, and 0.35 mile east of the BART Parcel and is classified as moderate.

The proposed project would be located within the INSP Planning Area and would not exceed the buildout anticipated by the original project. Similar to the original project, the proposed project would be subject to existing local programs and regulations including the Livermore General Plan’s Circulation Element which requires all residential, commercial, and industrial areas to provide efficient and safe access for emergency vehicles. In addition, the proposed project would be reviewed by the Livermore Fire Department which reviews and approves projects to ensure that emergency access standards are met, and therefore development facilitated by the project would be reviewed to ensure that it does not hinder emergency access or evacuation plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslopes or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map for Alameda County shows that none of the project parcels are not located in a State Responsibility Area or lands classified as Very High Fire Severity Zones (CAL FIRE 2022). The nearest State Responsibility Area is located approximately 0.11 mile west of the Comcast Parcels, 0.33 mile north of the Isabel Crossing Parcels, and 0.35 mile east of the BART Parcel and is classified as moderate.

The 2018 EIR determined that with implementation of existing State and local programs and regulations as well as the policies of the INSP, impacts would be less than significant.

EXHIBIT B
1157
While pollutant concentrations from wildfire and the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure were not specifically addressed in the 2018 EIR, the proposed project would be on the same project site as the original project and entirely within the INSP planning area analyzed in the 2018 EIR, and would not substantially change existing conditions or require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure beyond what was planned for the INSP and considered in the 2018 EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the 2018 EIR for the original project.

EXHIBIT B
1158
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
1159
5 Cumulative Impacts
In addition to the specific impacts of individual projects, CEQA requires consideration of potential cumulative impacts of the proposed project. CEQA defines “cumulative impacts” as two or more individual impacts that, when considered together, are substantial or will compound other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts are the combined changes in the environment that result from the incremental impact of development of the proposed project and other past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts. For example, noise impacts of two nearby projects may be less than significant when analyzed separately but could have a significant impact when analyzed together. The cumulative impact analysis provides a reasonable forecast of future environmental conditions and can more accurately gauge the effects of a series of projects.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 requires cumulative impact analysis in EIRs to consider either a list of planned and pending projects that may contribute to cumulative effects or a summary of projections contained in an adopted planning document such as a general plan.

Impacts Identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR
The cumulative setting for the analysis in the 2020 EIR is explained in Section 4.2, Cumulative Impacts, of the 2020 SEIR. As stated in that section, cumulative impacts of the INSP were considered in conjunction with the Valley Link Project, which would construct new rail stations at Greenville Road and Isabel Avenue in Livermore, traversing the INSP area. The 2020 SEIR indicates that some sections of the EIR are cumulative in nature, including air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation. The 2018 EIR provides an additional cumulative analysis for the following topics: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems.

The 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR determined that the following resource areas would have a considerable contribution to a cumulative impact: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, population and housing, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources.

The 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR determined that the following resource areas would not have a considerable contribution to a cumulative impact: geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems.

Impacts of the Proposed Project
Since certification of the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, there has been no new development proposed within the INSP area that was not considered as part of the INSP. Similarly, the Valley Link Project has not changed substantially since the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. There are no new cumulative projects in the INSP area that were not previously considered in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. The cumulative conditions in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR have not substantially changed; therefore, the cumulative setting in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR remains the same for the purposes of this analysis.

EXHIBIT B
1160
The proposed project would not result in new impacts compared to the INSP as analyzed in this Addendum. While the project would result in the potential future development of a greater number of housing units and less commercial and office space in the INSP area than analyzed in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR, the physical development area of the INSP would not be modified. Therefore, no new or additional cumulatively considerable contributions to a significant cumulative impact would occur as a result of the project.

Conclusion
The proposed project would not result in new or more severe cumulatively considerable impacts than were identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. No new or substantially more severe significant effects would occur to cumulative impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. No substantial changes have occurred that require major revisions to the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. There is no new information indicating that the proposed project would have new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts with respect to cumulative impacts than were identified in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. None of the conditions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met.

EXHIBIT B
1161
6 Conclusion
Analysis in Section 2, Overview of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and Section 15164, and Section 4, Impact Analysis, there are no project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the proposed project or its site; potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR; or previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information, which was not known at the time the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR were certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact.

Analysis in Section 4, Impact Analysis, determined that substantial changes are not proposed to the original project nor have substantial changes occurred that would require major revisions to the 2018 EIR or 2020 SEIR prepared for the original project. Substantially more severe impacts beyond those identified and analyzed in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Overall, the proposed project would result in no new impact or mitigation information of substantial importance that would generate new, more severe impacts or require new mitigation measures compared to those identified for the original project in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR. As such, the proposed project would not result in conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring supplemental environmental review or a Subsequent EIR, and these are therefore not required for the proposed project.

Therefore, the City concludes that the analyses conducted, the conclusions reached, and the mitigation measures adopted in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR would not be substantially changed for the proposed project. The proposed project would remain subject to all previously adopted mitigation measures and uniformly applicable development policies included in the 2018 EIR and 2020 SEIR for the original project. Based on the above analysis, no subsequent action under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15164 is required.

EXHIBIT B
1162
This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT B
1163
7 References
California Department of Finance (DOF). 2024. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2020-2024.
https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-andhousingestimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2024/ (accessed May 2024).

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2022. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area https://calfireforestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=988d431a42b242b29d89597 ab693d008 (accessed December 2023).

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2024a. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates.
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates (accessed May 2024).
______. 2024b. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/9?siteID=8 (accessed May 2024).
______. 2024c. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/7?siteID=7 (accessed May 2024).

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2023. EnviroStor Database. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=livermore (accessed December 2023).

California Water Service (Cal Water). 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Livermore District. https://www.calwater.com/docs/uwmp2020/LIV_2020_UWMP_FINAL.pdf (accessed May 2024)
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009. National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer https://hazardsfema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b552 9aa9cd (accessed December 2023).

Federal Transportation Administration. 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018.
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no0123_0.pdf (accessed June 2024).

Livermore, City of. 2004. City of Livermore General Plan 2003-2025 Open Space and Conservation Element.
https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/communitydevelopment/planning/2003-2025- general-plan#!/ (accessed May 2024).
______. 2012. Livermore Executive Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. August 2012. https://www.acgov.org/cda/planning/generalplans/documents/Cover_LVK_ALUC2012.pdf (accessed June 2024).

EXHIBIT B
1164
______. 2018. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan.
https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/community-development/planning/specificplans/isabel-neighborhood-specific-plan (accessed June 2024). ______. 2020a. Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan. https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/communitydevelopment/planning/specific-plans/isabel-neighborhood-specific-plan/insp-draft-andfinal-environmental-impact-report-eir (accessed June 2024). ______. 2020b. Community Services and Infrastructure Report. https://www.livermoreca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/6707/6375833321287700 00 (accessed May 2024).
______. 2023. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan
https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/community-development/planning/specificplans/isabel-neighborhood-specific-plan (accessed June 2024).

Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD). 2021. Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Year End Report 2020.
https://www.lpfire.org/home/showpublisheddocument/6001/637575327264800000 (accessed May 2024).

Livermore Police Department (LPD). 2023. Livermore Police Department Annual Report 2022. https://www.livermoreca.gov/home/showdocument?id=10400&t=638234585303600000 (accessed May 2024).

State Water Resources Control Board. 2023. Geotracker Database. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=livermore# (accessed December 2023).

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species.
https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe0989 3cf75b8dbfb77 (accessed June 2024).

EXHIBIT B
1165
Appendix A
Project Site Plans

EXHIBIT C
1166

EXHIBIT C
1167

EXHIBIT C
1168

EXHIBIT C
1169

EXHIBIT C
1170

EXHIBIT C
1171

EXHIBIT C
1172

EXHIBIT C
1173

EXHIBIT C
1174

EXHIBIT C
1175

EXHIBIT C
1176

EXHIBIT C
1177

EXHIBIT C
1178

EXHIBIT C
1179

EXHIBIT C
1180

EXHIBIT C
1181

EXHIBIT C
1182

EXHIBIT C
1183

EXHIBIT C
1184

EXHIBIT C
1185

EXHIBIT C
1186

EXHIBIT C
1187

EXHIBIT C
1188

EXHIBIT C
1189

EXHIBIT C
1190

EXHIBIT C
1191

EXHIBIT C
1192

EXHIBIT C
1193

EXHIBIT C
1194

EXHIBIT C
1195

EXHIBIT C
1196

EXHIBIT C
1197

EXHIBIT C
1198

EXHIBIT C
1199

EXHIBIT C
1200

EXHIBIT C
1201

EXHIBIT C
1202

EXHIBIT C
1203

EXHIBIT C
1204

EXHIBIT C
1205

EXHIBIT C
1206

EXHIBIT C
1207

EXHIBIT C
1208

EXHIBIT C
1209

EXHIBIT C
1210

MA NI STREET

EXHIBIT C
1211

10.0'

EXHIBIT C
1212

10.0'

EXHIBIT C
1213

EXHIBIT C
1214
ROOM NAME ROOM NAME Main Street

EXHIBIT C
1215

26.0'4.2' 26.0' 4.2'
Main Street Main Street

EXHIBIT C
1216

10.0' 7.5' 10.0'

10.0'

10.0' 7.5' 10.0' 8.0'

8.0' 5.3'

8.0'

EXHIBIT C
1217

10.0' 7.5'

EXHIBIT C
1218

EXHIBIT C
1219

10.0'

EXHIBIT C
1220

EXHIBIT C
1221

EXHIBIT C
1222

EXHIBIT C
1223

EXHIBIT C
1224

EXHIBIT C
1225

EXHIBIT C
1226

EXHIBIT C
1227

EXHIBIT C
1228

EXHIBIT C
1229

EXHIBIT C
1230
UP
17R
ES S

EXHIBIT C
1231
± 37’-5” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”
UP
17R
ES S

EXHIBIT C
1232
UP
17R
ES S

EXHIBIT C
1233
UP
17R
ES S
± 37’-5” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1234
UP
ES S
± 37’-5” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1235
± 37’-5” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”
UP
ES S

EXHIBIT C
1236
44'-4"
UP
17R
ESS
2'-6" 46'-10"
UP
18 R
46'-4"
DN
18R

EXHIBIT C
1237
48'-10"
UP
ESS
44'-4" 4'-6"
49'-4"
DN
17 R
UP
18 R
DN
18R

EXHIBIT C
1238
UP
17 R
ESS
48'-10"45'-4" 3'-6"
49'-4"
DN
17R
UP
18 R
DN
18R

EXHIBIT C
1239
UP
17R
ESS
6'-0" 4'-10" 3'-0"
3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-10" UP
18 R
DN
18R
3'-0"
3'-0"
6'-0" 3'-10" 6'-0" 3'-10"

3.5 :12
12" TYP. 12" TYP.

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

EXHIBIT C
1240
UP
ESS
3050 4016
3'-0"
6'-0" 5'-10" 6'-0" 4'-10"
3'-0" DN
17 R
UP
18 R
3050 4016 DN
18R
3'-0"
6'-0" 3'-10" 6'-0" 3'-10"
3'-0"

3.5 :12
4 :12
12" TYP. 12" TYP.

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

EXHIBIT C
1241
UP
ESS UP
17 R
ESS 2'-6" CLR. 4'-0" CLR. 5'-0" CLR. 4'-0" CLR. 3'-0" CLR. 4'-6" CLR. 30"X48" CLEAR 5'-0" CLR. 4'-0" CLR. 5'-0" CLR. 4'-0" CLR.
3'-0"
3'-0"
6'-0" 4'-10" 6'-0" 4'-10" 6'-0" 5'-10" DN
17 R
UP
18 R
DN
17R
UP
18 R
DN
18R
DN
18R
3'-0"
3'-0"
6'-0" 3'-10" 6'-0" 3'-10" 6'-0" 3'-10"
12" TYP. 3.5 :12
12" TYP.
12" TYP. 12" TYP.

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

EXHIBIT C
1242
9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ± 37’-5” Building Height
UP

ES S UP
17 R
ES S

EXHIBIT C
1243
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-1"

EXHIBIT C
1244
9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"

EXHIBIT C
1245

EXHIBIT C
1246

EXHIBIT C
1247
9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ±38’-3” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ±38’-3” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1248

EXHIBIT C
1249
9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ±38’-3” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ±38’-3” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1250

EXHIBIT C
1251

EXHIBIT C
1252

EXHIBIT C
1253
6'-0" 3'-4" 6'-0" 4'-6"
6'-0" 1'-0"

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

EXHIBIT C
1254
6'-0" 2'-4" 6'-0" 8'-0" 6'-0" 3'-6"

3.5:12

3.5:12
4:12 RIDGE 4:12 RIDGE RIDGE 4:12
4:12 RIDGE 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
12" TYP. 12" TYP.
12" TYP.
12" TYP.
12" TYP.

EXHIBIT C
1255
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-3
1 2
" 6'-8"MIN. 7
3 4
" 7
3 4
"

EXHIBIT C
1256
T.O.P. F.F./T.O.C. T.O.P. F.F. T.O.P. F.F. 11'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 8"
9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
8" T.O.P. F.F./T.O.C. T.O.P. F.F. T.O.P. F.F. 11'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 8"

EXHIBIT C
1257

EXHIBIT C
1258
UP 1 7R

EXHIBIT C
1259
9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ± 36’-9” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1260
UP 1 7R

EXHIBIT C
1261
± 34’-6” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1262
UP 1 7R

EXHIBIT C
1263
± 36’-9” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1264
UP 1 7R

EXHIBIT C
1265
± 36’-9” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1266

EXHIBIT C
1267

EXHIBIT C
1268

EXHIBIT C
1269
6'-0" 4'-6" 6'-0" 1'-3"
2040 SH 2040 SH 2040 SH
6'-0" 3'-6" 6'-0" 3'-5
1 2
"

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED
5:12
12" TYP. 12" TYP.

EXHIBIT C
1270
6'-0" 1'-3"
6'-0" 2'-0"
2040 SH 2040 SH 2040 SH
6'-0" 5'-8
1 2
" 6'-0" 3'-5
1 2
"

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

3.5:12
12" TYP. 12" TYP.

EXHIBIT C
1271
6'-0" 4'-6"
6'-0" 2'-0"
6'-0" 3'-6"
6'-0" 5'-8
1 2
"

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED
12" TYP. 12" TYP.

EXHIBIT C
1272
6'-0" 1'-3" 6'-0" 4'-6"
6'-0" 2'-0"
6'-0" 3'-6" 6'-0" 3'-6"
6'-0" 5'-8
1 2
"

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

3.5:12

EXHIBIT C
1273
9’1” 9’1” 9’1” ± 36’-9” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1274
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-1"
7 1
4 " 7'-1" 6'-8" MIN. 7
1 4
" 7'-7" 6'-8" MIN.

EXHIBIT C
1275

EXHIBIT C
1276

EXHIBIT C
1277
2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE RECY CL E 19" X 22.25"ORGANIC 19" X 22.25" 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORA 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE RECY CL E 19" X 22.25"ORGANIC 19" X 22.25" 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORA

EXHIBIT C
1278
± 37’-8” Building Height 9’ 1” 9’ 1” 9’ 1”

EXHIBIT C
1279
2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE RECY CL E 19" X 22.25"ORGANIC 19" X 22.25" 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORA 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE RECY CL E 19" X 22.25"ORGANIC 19" X 22.25" 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORA

EXHIBIT C
1280
± 37’-8” Building Height 9’ 1” 9’ 1” 9’ 1”

EXHIBIT C
1281
2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE
TRASH

25.25" X 26.37" 19" X 22.25" RECYCLE 19" X 22.25" ORGANIC 2 Bdrm|2.5 Bath| Tandem Garage| 1,177 S.F. Third Floor Second Floor First Floor

EXHIBIT C
1282
2 Bdrm|2.5 Bath| Tandem Garage| 1,315 S.F. Third Floor Second Floor First Floor

EXHIBIT C
1283
W/H
TRASH

25.25" X 26.37" RECYCLE 19" X 22.25" ORGANIC
19" X 22.25" 2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE W/H
TRASH

25.25" X 26.37" RECYCLE 19" X 22.25" ORGANIC
19" X 22.25" 2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE 3 Bdrm|3 Bath| Tandem Garage| 1,502 S.F. @Accessible unit Third Floor Second Floor First Floor First Floor +97 S.F.

EXHIBIT C
1284

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED
2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE
2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE 2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE 2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE
2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE
6'-0" 6'-6" 6'-0" 2'-0" 6'-0" 5'-0"

EXHIBIT C
1285
6'-0" 3'-6" 6'-0" 3'-6" 6'-0" 3'-6"

3.5":12
12" TYP.
12" TYP.
12" TYP.

EXHIBIT C
1286
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-3
2 1
" 6'-8"MIN. 7
4 3
" 7
4 3
"

EXHIBIT C
1287

EXHIBIT C
1288

EXHIBIT C
1289

EXHIBIT C
1290

EXHIBIT C
1291

EXHIBIT C
1292

EXHIBIT C
1293
± 72’-8” Typ. Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1294
± 72’-8” Typ. Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1295
2'-6" CLR. 2'-6" CLR. 2'-6" CLR. 3080
3080
3080
3080
2'-6" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.

EXHIBIT C
1296
3'-8" CLR. 4'-0" CLR.
3'-3" CLR.
1'-6" CLR.
3'-3" CLR. 1'-6" CLR. 3'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR.
30 SC 68
3068
2'-6" CLR.
2668

EXHIBIT C
1297
4'-0" CLR. 2'-6" CLR. 2'-6" CLR. 4'-0" CLR.

EXHIBIT C
1298

EXHIBIT C
1299

EXHIBIT C
1300
96" 72"
33" 72" 51" 72"

ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED
48'-7"
17'-11"
5'-7"3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"
10'-4" 11'-3"

EXHIBIT C
1301

ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED
5'-11"

EXHIBIT C
1302

EXHIBIT C
1303

EXHIBIT C
1304
2768
26 68
3080
3080
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080
3080
3080
3080
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080
3080
3080
3080
3080
3080 68 30 80 30 80 30 3'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 50 60 50 60 2'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 80 30 80 80 3080
3080
3080 6080
3080
3080
2480 80 30 68 30 68 30 68 30FR. DOOR
68 2768
3068 BI-PASS 6068
3068
3068
1'-6" CLR . 3'-2
2 1
" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 3068 30 80
3080
3' -0" LC R. 4' 0- " C RL . 6050 6050
4 0'- " C RL . 4 -
' 0 C" RL . 0- C" RL . 4 0'- " C 4 0'- " 3080
80 80
6080 80
2480
3080 68 30
3068 BI-PASS 6068 BI-PASS 68 60
30 SC 68
3068 68 30 68 30
3'-8" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 1'-0" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-2 12" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 3'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 68 30 3080
03 86
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2768
3068
3068
3068
FR. DOOR
2668
3'-0" CLR . 6050 6050 2'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080 80 80 80 30 80 30
6080 80 30 80 30
2 84 0
3080 80 30 80 30
3068
3068
30 68
FR. DOOR
3068
68 3080
3080
2'-6" LC R. 2 '-6" LC R. 3080
3080
3080
3080
60 80
3 068
03 68
03 86RF D. O R
3068
672 8
3080
3080 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 26 68
2668 68 30 68 30 68 30FR. DOOR
30 2768
03 SC 86
2'-6" CLR . 2768
30 SC 68
3068
2'-6" CLR . 26 86
2668 DN
18R
DN
18R
1'-6" CLR . 1'-0" CLR .
3080 SC 86 30
' 2 6- " LC R. 2050
40" 72"

EXHIBIT C
1305
3068 BI P- AS 6 60 8
30 SC 68
3068
3 8-' " LC R. 4 0'- " C RL . 3 -' "3 C RL . 1 6-' C" LR. 3' -3" C RL . ' 1 - " 6 C RL . 3 0-' " LC R. 2'-6" LC R. 2'-6" LC R. " LC R. " LC R. 80 80
3'-0 C" L . R
4'-0" C RL . 0" C RL . 6 50 0 60 50
4 -' 0" C RL . 4'-0" LC R. 4 -' 0" C 4 -' " 0
3 80 0
80 80
6080
08 2480
3 80 0
2 6-' " C RL . 2 6'- " C RL . 3080
3080
3080
3080
30 SC 68
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3068
3068
30 68
FR. DOOR
3068
26 3 080
3080
2 6-' C" LR. 2'-6 C" LR. 30 80
3080
3080
3 080
3'-0 C" RL . 4 0'- " C RL . " C RL . 06 5 0
60 05
4'-0 C" RL . 4'-0 C" RL . 3080
80 80
06 80
08 03
2480
3 80 0
3068
3 60 8
03 86
F . R OD R
3068 68 30FR. DOOR
2768 SC 68 30 BI-PASS 6068
3068
3068
30 68
FR. DOOR
3068 68 30
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 68
24 68
30 SC 68
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 42 68
42 86
42 68
03 86
4068
4068 SC 68 03
' 2 6- " C RL .

EXHIBIT C
1306
2768
3080
3080
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080
3080
3080
3080
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080
3080
3080
3080
3080
3080 80 30 80 30 3'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 80 30 80 80 3080
3080
30 80 6080
3080
3080
2480 80 30
1'-6" CLR . 3'-2
2 1
" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 3080
3080
3'-0" C RL .
'- 4 0 C" RL . C" RL .
' 4 0- " C RL . "0 C RL . 4 -
' 0 C" RL . 4 -' 0 C" RL .
' 4 0- " C ' 4 0- " 80
80 60
0803
2480
30 3'-8" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 1'-0" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-2 1 2 " CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 3'-3" CLR . 1'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 3'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR .
3'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3080 80 80 80 30 80 30
6080 80 30 80 30
24 3080 80 30 80 30
3080
30 80
2'- "6 C RL . 2 -' " 6 C RL . 3080
3080
3080
3080
60 80
86 3080
3080 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2768
2'-6" CLR .
2'-6" CLR . DN
18R
DN
18R
1'-6" CLR . 1'-0" CLR .
3080
2' - "6 C RL . 86 27

EXHIBIT C
1307
3068 BI P- AS 60 68
03 SC 68
30 68
' 3 8- C" LR. 4 0-' " LC R. 3'-3 " LC R. 1'- 6" C RL . 3'-3" C RL . 1 '-6" C RL . ' 3 0- C" LR. 2'-6" C RL . 2'-6" C RL .
80 4 0-' " C RL . 6 50 0 6050
-' 4 "0 LC R. "0 LC R. -' 4 "0 C -' 4 "0 C
03 80
80 8 0
6 8 0 0
08 2480
3 80 0
2'-6" LC R. 2 6-' " LC R. 3080
3080
308 0
3 8 0 0
68 4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 3068
3068
3068
FR. DOOR
68 68
30 80
3080
2'- 6" C RL . 2 -' " 6 C RL . 308 0
3080
3080
3080
3' 0- C" RL . 4'-0" CL .R
6050 6050
4' -0 C" L . R 0 C" L . R
4-' 0" LC R. 4' -0 C" 4' -0 C
3 80 0
80 80
60 80
03 2480
3 80 0
3 60 8
30 86
03 86
3068 68 30FR. DOOR
2768 SC 68 30 BI-PASS 6068
3068
3068
30 68
FR. DOOR
3068 68 30
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 30
26 2468
CS 68 30
2 6-' " LC . R
30 SC 68
4'-0" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 2'-6" CLR . 4'-0" CLR . 24 86
2 64 8
2 64 8
30 86
4068
4068

EXHIBIT C
1308

EXHIBIT C
1309

EXHIBIT C
1310
2 46 .1 1 23 .0 1 23 .0 1 23 .0 1 09 .0 6 3.0
7 87 .1 Ap px 1 20 .0 1 47 .0 1 23 .0 1 23 .0 1 23 .0 1 09 .0 6 3.0 7 89 .7 Ap px

EXHIBIT C
1311

EXHIBIT C
1312

EXHIBIT C
1313
>
>
> > > > > > > > >

EXHIBIT C
1314

EXHIBIT C
1315

EXHIBIT C
1316

EXHIBIT C
1317

EXHIBIT C
1318

EXHIBIT C
1319

EXHIBIT C
1320

ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED
42" 72"
9'-7"

EXHIBIT C
1321

EXHIBIT C
1322
DN
18R
UP
18R
42" 72"

EXHIBIT C
1323
DN
18R

EXHIBIT C
1324
DN
18R
DN
18R

EXHIBIT C
1325

EXHIBIT C
1326

EXHIBIT C
1327

EXHIBIT C
1328

X X X X

EXHIBIT C
1329

EXHIBIT C
1330
± 82’-8” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1331
± 82’-8” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1332

EXHIBIT C
1333
4'-1"

EXHIBIT C
1334
81 R

EXHIBIT C
1335
DN18R

EXHIBIT C
1336
DN18R

EXHIBIT C
1337
DN18R

EXHIBIT C
1338

EXHIBIT C
1339

EXHIBIT C
1340
UNIT 2
- REVERSED
UNIT 1
- STANDARD
UNIT 1
- STANDARD
UNIT 2
- STANDARD
UNIT 2 REVERSEDUNIT 1 STANDARDUNIT 1 STANDARDUNIT 2 STANDARD DN
18 R
UP
UP

EXHIBIT C
1341

EXHIBIT C
1342

EXHIBIT C
1343
± 56’-11” Typ. Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1344

EXHIBIT C
1345

EXHIBIT C
1346

EXHIBIT C
1347

EXHIBIT C
1348
UP
UP
114" 72"
15'-8"
2'-6" 5'-1" 5'-6"3'-1" 3'-1" 4'-5"3'-1" 3'-0" 3'-1" 5'-1"3'-1" 16'-0"

EXHIBIT C
1349
DN
UP
DN
UP
22'-11" 17'-2" 5'-9"

EXHIBIT C
1350
16'-0" x 18'-0"
DN
UP
DN
UP
42" 72"

EXHIBIT C
1351
16'-0" x 18'-0"
DN
UP
DN
UP

EXHIBIT C
1352

EXHIBIT C
1353

EXHIBIT C
1354

EXHIBIT C
1355

EXHIBIT C
1356
UP
18 R DN 18 RDN 18 R
DN
18 R
DN
18 R
DN
18 R
UP
UP

EXHIBIT C
1357

EXHIBIT C
1358

EXHIBIT C
1359
± 67’-3” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1360

EXHIBIT C
1361

EXHIBIT C
1362

EXHIBIT C
1363

EXHIBIT C
1364

EXHIBIT C
1365
18RDNDN 18R
DN
18R
DN
18R
DN
18R
DN
18R
36" 89" 72"
36"
115" 72"
62" 72"
25'-5"
18'-4"
1'-7" 4'-8" 1'-7" 2'-6" 5'-11" 3'-0" 3'-1" 3'-1" 3'-1" 4'-11" 2'-1" 2'-6" 5'-0" 2'-0" 15'-9"

EXHIBIT C
1366
DN
18R
DN
18R
DN
18R DN 18RDN 18R
42" 72"

EXHIBIT C
1367
DN
18R
DN
18R
DN
18R DN 18RDN 18R

EXHIBIT C
1368

EXHIBIT C
1369

EXHIBIT C
1370

EXHIBIT C
1371

EXHIBIT C
1372
2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE

EXHIBIT C
1373
± 38’-3” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1374
2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE 2' -0" x 6 '-0" BICYCL E STORAGE

EXHIBIT C
1375
± 38’-3” Building Height 9’1” 9’1” 9’1”

EXHIBIT C
1376

EXHIBIT C
1377
2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE

EXHIBIT C
1378
2'-0" x 6'-0" BICYCLE STORAGE
6'-0" 3'-0"6'-0" 1'-0"

NO RESCUE OPENINGS - NO LADDER PADS REQUIRED

EXHIBIT C
1379
6'-0" 5'-11
1 2
" 6'-0" 3'-6"

3.5:12

3.5:12
12" TYP. 12" TYP.
12" TYP.

EXHIBIT C
1380
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1" 9'-1"
9'-1"
9'-1"
7 3
4 " 6'-11" 6'-8" MIN. 7
3 4
" 7'-6
1 2
" 6'-8" MIN.

EXHIBIT C
1381

EXHIBIT C
1382

EXHIBIT C
1383

EXHIBIT C
1384

EXHIBIT C
1385

EXHIBIT C
1386
±30’-2” Building Height

EXHIBIT C
1387

EXHIBIT C
1388

EXHIBIT C
1389
RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE 5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12

EXHIBIT C
1390
10'-1" 10'-1"
10'-1" 10'-1" ±29'-3
1 4
"

EXHIBIT C
1391

EXHIBIT C
1392

EXHIBIT C
1393

EXHIBIT C
1394

EXHIBIT C
1395

EXHIBIT C
1396

EXHIBIT C
1397

EXHIBIT C
1398

EXHIBIT C
1399

EXHIBIT C
1400

EXHIBIT C
1401

EXHIBIT C
1402

EXHIBIT C
1403

EXHIBIT C
1404

EXHIBIT C
1405

EXHIBIT C
1406

EXHIBIT C
1407

EXHIBIT C
1408

EXHIBIT C
1409

EXHIBIT C
1410

EXHIBIT C
1411

EXHIBIT C
1412

EXHIBIT C
1413

EXHIBIT C
1414

EXHIBIT C
1415

EXHIBIT C
1416

EXHIBIT C
1417

EXHIBIT C
1418

EXHIBIT C
1419

EXHIBIT C
1420

EXHIBIT C
1421

EXHIBIT C
1422

EXHIBIT C
1423

EXHIBIT C
1424

EXHIBIT C
1425

EXHIBIT C
1426

EXHIBIT C
1427

EXHIBIT C
1428

EXHIBIT C
1429

EXHIBIT C
1430
Appendix B
CalEEMod Output Files

EXHIBIT D
1431
Appendix B-1
Isabel Crossing Parcels – Original Project

EXHIBIT D
1432
1 / 113
Harridge Development Orginal Project Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1433
2 / 113

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.4. Site Preparation (2024) - Mitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.6. Grading (2024) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.12. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.14. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.15. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.16. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated

3.17. Building Construction (2029) - Unmitigated

3.18. Building Construction (2029) - Mitigated

3.19. Paving (2029) - Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1434
3 / 113

3.20. Paving (2029) - Mitigated

3.21. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated

3.22. Architectural Coating (2029) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1435
4 / 113

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

EXHIBIT D
1436
5 / 113

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

EXHIBIT D
1437
6 / 113

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1438
7 / 113

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

EXHIBIT D
1439
8 / 113

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

EXHIBIT D
1440
9 / 113

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data

EXHIBIT D
1441
10 / 113

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Harridge Development Orginal Project
Construction Start Date 1/1/2024
Operational Year 2040
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 33.2
Location 37.706194790730734, -121.79792273434387
County Alameda
City Livermore
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 1677
EDFZ 1
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.20

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description

EXHIBIT D
1442
11 / 113
Single Family
Housing
138 Dwelling Unit 48.4 269,100 1,616,374 — 389 —
Apartments Mid Rise 451 Dwelling Unit 0.00 432,960 0.00 — 1,272 — Apartments Low
Rise
749 Dwelling Unit 0.00 793,940 0.00 — 2,112 —
General Office
Building

39.6 1000sqft 0.91 39,640 0.00 — — —
Regional Shopping
Center
167 1000sqft 3.84 167,190 0.00 — — —
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
819 Space 0.00 327,600 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 281 Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

2.17 Acre 2.17 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Transportation T-4 Integrate Aordable and Below Market Rate Housing Water W-7 Adopt a Water Conservation Strategy
Waste S-1/S-2 Implement Waste Reduction Plan

2. Emissions Summary

EXHIBIT D
1443
12 / 113
Unmit. 311 36.0 59.3 0.07 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 18,217 18,217 0.52 1.28 54.9 18,665 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 5.21 34.4 57.5 0.07 1.45 10.9 11.4 1.33 3.69 5.02 — 17,797 17,797 0.59 1.34 1.52 18,214 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 64.3 21.5 38.0 0.05 0.88 7.62 7.97 0.81 2.50 3.31 — 12,557 12,557 0.40 0.93 17.0 12,861 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 11.7 3.93 6.93 0.01 0.16 1.39 1.45 0.15 0.46 0.60 — 2,079 2,079 0.07 0.15 2.81 2,129

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 3.71 36.0 33.7 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 6,775 6,775 0.27 0.06 0.75 6,800 2025 5.12 20.4 59.3 0.07 0.52 10.9 11.4 0.48 2.61 3.10 — 18,217 18,217 0.52 1.28 54.9 18,665 2026 4.61 19.5 56.6 0.07 0.46 10.9 11.3 0.43 2.61 3.05 — 17,929 17,929 0.52 1.28 50.7 18,373 2027 4.42 18.4 53.7 0.07 0.42 10.9 11.3 0.40 2.61 3.01 — 17,633 17,633 0.49 1.28 46.4 18,072 2028 4.30 17.7 51.5 0.07 0.39 10.9 11.2 0.36 2.61 2.98 — 17,328 17,328 0.49 0.94 42.1 17,663 2029 311 6.48 10.4 0.01 0.24 1.85 1.86 0.22 0.43 0.44 — 1,933 1,933 0.06 0.02 5.07 1,943 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 5.21 34.4 57.5 0.07 1.45 10.9 11.4 1.33 3.69 5.02 — 17,797 17,797 0.59 1.34 1.52 18,214 2025 4.96 21.9 54.4 0.07 0.52 10.9 11.4 0.48 2.61 3.10 — 17,521 17,521 0.59 1.30 1.43 17,925

EXHIBIT D
1444
13 / 113
2026 4.47 20.6 51.7 0.07 0.46 10.9 11.3 0.43 2.61 3.05 — 17,248 17,248 0.57 1.30 1.32 17,651 2027 4.31 19.5 49.5 0.07 0.42 10.9 11.3 0.40 2.61 3.01 — 16,966 16,966 0.57 1.30 1.20 17,369 2028 4.17 18.4 47.3 0.07 0.39 10.9 11.2 0.36 2.61 2.98 — 16,673 16,673 0.54 1.26 1.09 17,063 2029 4.00 17.8 45.5 0.07 0.36 10.9 11.2 0.30 2.61 2.91 — 16,373 16,373 0.49 1.23 0.99 16,753 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 2.55 21.5 23.3 0.04 0.88 6.16 7.04 0.81 2.50 3.31 — 5,237 5,237 0.19 0.17 2.90 5,297 2025 3.53 15.2 38.0 0.05 0.37 7.60 7.97 0.34 1.83 2.17 — 12,557 12,557 0.40 0.93 17.0 12,861 2026 3.18 14.4 36.1 0.05 0.33 7.60 7.93 0.31 1.83 2.14 — 12,360 12,360 0.39 0.91 15.7 12,657 2027 3.05 13.6 34.6 0.05 0.30 7.60 7.90 0.28 1.83 2.11 — 12,158 12,158 0.39 0.91 14.3 12,454 2028 2.97 13.1 33.2 0.05 0.28 7.62 7.89 0.26 1.83 2.09 — 11,981 11,981 0.37 0.88 13.0 12,265 2029 64.3 2.90 6.94 0.01 0.08 1.21 1.29 0.07 0.29 0.36 — 1,960 1,960 0.06 0.11 1.73 1,997 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.47 3.93 4.25 0.01 0.16 1.12 1.28 0.15 0.46 0.60 — 867 867 0.03 0.03 0.48 877 2025 0.64 2.78 6.93 0.01 0.07 1.39 1.45 0.06 0.33 0.40 — 2,079 2,079 0.07 0.15 2.81 2,129 2026 0.58 2.62 6.59 0.01 0.06 1.39 1.45 0.06 0.33 0.39 — 2,046 2,046 0.06 0.15 2.59 2,096 2027 0.56 2.48 6.32 0.01 0.06 1.39 1.44 0.05 0.33 0.38 — 2,013 2,013 0.06 0.15 2.37 2,062 2028 0.54 2.39 6.06 0.01 0.05 1.39 1.44 0.05 0.33 0.38 — 1,984 1,984 0.06 0.15 2.16 2,031 2029 11.7 0.53 1.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.22 0.23 0.01 0.05 0.07 — 325 325 0.01 0.02 0.29 331

EXHIBIT D
1445
14 / 113
2026 4.61 19.5 56.6 0.07 0.46 10.9 11.3 0.43 2.61 3.05 — 17,929 17,929 0.52 1.28 50.7 18,373 2027 4.42 18.4 53.7 0.07 0.42 10.9 11.3 0.40 2.61 3.01 — 17,633 17,633 0.49 1.28 46.4 18,072 2028 4.30 17.7 51.5 0.07 0.39 10.9 11.2 0.36 2.61 2.98 — 17,328 17,328 0.49 0.94 42.1 17,663 2029 311 6.48 10.4 0.01 0.24 1.85 1.86 0.22 0.43 0.44 — 1,933 1,933 0.06 0.02 5.07 1,943 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 5.21 34.4 57.5 0.07 1.45 10.9 11.4 1.33 3.69 5.02 — 17,797 17,797 0.59 1.34 1.52 18,214 2025 4.96 21.9 54.4 0.07 0.52 10.9 11.4 0.48 2.61 3.10 — 17,521 17,521 0.59 1.30 1.43 17,925 2026 4.47 20.6 51.7 0.07 0.46 10.9 11.3 0.43 2.61 3.05 — 17,248 17,248 0.57 1.30 1.32 17,651 2027 4.31 19.5 49.5 0.07 0.42 10.9 11.3 0.40 2.61 3.01 — 16,966 16,966 0.57 1.30 1.20 17,369 2028 4.17 18.4 47.3 0.07 0.39 10.9 11.2 0.36 2.61 2.98 — 16,673 16,673 0.54 1.26 1.09 17,063 2029 4.00 17.8 45.5 0.07 0.36 10.9 11.2 0.30 2.61 2.91 — 16,373 16,373 0.49 1.23 0.99 16,753 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 2.55 21.5 23.3 0.04 0.88 6.16 7.04 0.81 2.50 3.31 — 5,237 5,237 0.19 0.17 2.90 5,297 2025 3.53 15.2 38.0 0.05 0.37 7.60 7.97 0.34 1.83 2.17 — 12,557 12,557 0.40 0.93 17.0 12,861 2026 3.18 14.4 36.1 0.05 0.33 7.60 7.93 0.31 1.83 2.14 — 12,360 12,360 0.39 0.91 15.7 12,657 2027 3.05 13.6 34.6 0.05 0.30 7.60 7.90 0.28 1.83 2.11 — 12,158 12,158 0.39 0.91 14.3 12,454 2028 2.97 13.1 33.2 0.05 0.28 7.62 7.89 0.26 1.83 2.09 — 11,981 11,981 0.37 0.88 13.0 12,265 2029 64.3 2.90 6.94 0.01 0.08 1.21 1.29 0.07 0.29 0.36 — 1,960 1,960 0.06 0.11 1.73 1,997 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.47 3.93 4.25 0.01 0.16 1.12 1.28 0.15 0.46 0.60 — 867 867 0.03 0.03 0.48 877 2025 0.64 2.78 6.93 0.01 0.07 1.39 1.45 0.06 0.33 0.40 — 2,079 2,079 0.07 0.15 2.81 2,129 2026 0.58 2.62 6.59 0.01 0.06 1.39 1.45 0.06 0.33 0.39 — 2,046 2,046 0.06 0.15 2.59 2,096 2027 0.56 2.48 6.32 0.01 0.06 1.39 1.44 0.05 0.33 0.38 — 2,013 2,013 0.06 0.15 2.37 2,062 2028 0.54 2.39 6.06 0.01 0.05 1.39 1.44 0.05 0.33 0.38 — 1,984 1,984 0.06 0.15 2.16 2,031 2029 11.7 0.53 1.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.22 0.23 0.01 0.05 0.07 — 325 325 0.01 0.02 0.29 331

EXHIBIT D
1446
15 / 113

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 62.9 47.4 520 1.61 2.23 167 169 2.17 42.2 44.4 770 181,122 181,892 81.8 5.09 90.7 185,543 Mit. 62.9 47.4 520 1.61 2.23 167 169 2.17 42.2 44.4 205 181,079 181,285 25.3 5.04 90.7 183,509 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 73% < 0.5% < 0.5% 69% 1% — 1%
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 52.1 51.0 339 1.52 2.15 167 169 2.12 42.2 44.3 770 171,776 172,546 81.7 5.42 13.7 176,217 Mit. 52.1 51.0 339 1.52 2.15 167 169 2.12 42.2 44.3 205 171,734 171,939 25.2 5.37 13.7 174,183 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 73% < 0.5% < 0.5% 69% 1% — 1%
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 56.7 37.8 390 1.45 1.22 163 164 1.17 41.3 42.5 770 157,515 158,285 81.4 5.26 45.7 161,935 Mit. 56.7 37.8 390 1.45 1.22 163 164 1.17 41.3 42.5 205 157,472 157,678 24.9 5.22 45.7 159,901 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 73% < 0.5% < 0.5% 69% 1% — 1%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 10.3 6.89 71.1 0.26 0.22 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 127 26,078 26,206 13.5 0.87 7.57 26,810 Mit. 10.3 6.89 71.1 0.26 0.22 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 34.0 26,071 26,105 4.13 0.86 7.57 26,473 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 73% < 0.5% < 0.5% 69% 1% — 1%

EXHIBIT D
1447
16 / 113

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 11.8 27.3 412 1.48 0.60 167 167 0.57 42.2 42.8 — 151,339 151,339 2.59 4.62 79.1 152,861 Area 50.7 13.2 105 0.08 1.07 — 1.07 1.05 — 1.05 0.00 15,914 15,914 0.31 0.03 — 15,931 Energy 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 13,565 13,565 1.56 0.11 — 13,637 Water — — — — — — — — — — 128 304 432 13.2 0.32 — 857
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 642 0.00 642 64.1 0.00 — 2,245 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Total 62.9 47.4 520 1.61 2.23 167 169 2.17 42.2 44.4 770 181,122 181,892 81.8 5.09 90.7 185,543 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 11.4 31.8 331 1.40 0.60 167 167 0.57 42.2 42.8 — 142,292 142,292 2.46 4.96 2.05 143,834 Area 40.3 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Energy 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 13,565 13,565 1.56 0.11 — 13,637 Water — — — — — — — — — — 128 304 432 13.2 0.32 — 857
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 642 0.00 642 64.1 0.00 — 2,245 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Total 52.1 51.0 339 1.52 2.15 167 169 2.12 42.2 44.3 770 171,776 172,546 81.7 5.42 13.7 176,217 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 11.6 30.1 337 1.40 0.60 163 164 0.57 41.3 41.9 — 143,114 143,114 2.51 4.83 34.1 144,651 Area 44.7 0.75 49.2 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 0.00 532 532 0.01 < 0.005 — 533 Energy 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 13,565 13,565 1.56 0.11 — 13,637 Water — — — — — — — — — — 128 304 432 13.2 0.32 — 857

EXHIBIT D
1448
17 / 113
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 642 0.00 642 64.1 0.00 — 2,245 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Total 56.7 37.8 390 1.45 1.22 163 164 1.17 41.3 42.5 770 157,515 158,285 81.4 5.26 45.7 161,935 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.11 5.49 61.5 0.26 0.11 29.8 29.9 0.10 7.55 7.65 — 23,694 23,694 0.42 0.80 5.65 23,949 Area 8.16 0.14 8.98 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 88.1 88.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 88.3 Energy 0.07 1.26 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 2,246 2,246 0.26 0.02 — 2,258 Water — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 50.4 71.6 2.19 0.05 — 142 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 106 0.00 106 10.6 0.00 — 372
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.92 1.92
Total 10.3 6.89 71.1 0.26 0.22 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 127 26,078 26,206 13.5 0.87 7.57 26,810

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 11.8 27.3 412 1.48 0.60 167 167 0.57 42.2 42.8 — 151,339 151,339 2.59 4.62 79.1 152,861 Area 50.7 13.2 105 0.08 1.07 — 1.07 1.05 — 1.05 0.00 15,914 15,914 0.31 0.03 — 15,931 Energy 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 13,565 13,565 1.56 0.11 — 13,637 Water — — — — — — — — — — 109 262 371 11.2 0.27 — 732
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 96.3 0.00 96.3 9.62 0.00 — 337 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Total 62.9 47.4 520 1.61 2.23 167 169 2.17 42.2 44.4 205 181,079 181,285 25.3 5.04 90.7 183,509 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 11.4 31.8 331 1.40 0.60 167 167 0.57 42.2 42.8 — 142,292 142,292 2.46 4.96 2.05 143,834

EXHIBIT D
1449
18 / 113
Area 40.3 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Energy 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 13,565 13,565 1.56 0.11 — 13,637 Water — — — — — — — — — — 109 262 371 11.2 0.27 — 732
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 96.3 0.00 96.3 9.62 0.00 — 337 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Total 52.1 51.0 339 1.52 2.15 167 169 2.12 42.2 44.3 205 171,734 171,939 25.2 5.37 13.7 174,183 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 11.6 30.1 337 1.40 0.60 163 164 0.57 41.3 41.9 — 143,114 143,114 2.51 4.83 34.1 144,651 Area 44.7 0.75 49.2 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 0.00 532 532 0.01 < 0.005 — 533 Energy 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 13,565 13,565 1.56 0.11 — 13,637 Water — — — — — — — — — — 109 262 371 11.2 0.27 — 732
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 96.3 0.00 96.3 9.62 0.00 — 337 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Total 56.7 37.8 390 1.45 1.22 163 164 1.17 41.3 42.5 205 157,472 157,678 24.9 5.22 45.7 159,901 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.11 5.49 61.5 0.26 0.11 29.8 29.9 0.10 7.55 7.65 — 23,694 23,694 0.42 0.80 5.65 23,949 Area 8.16 0.14 8.98 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 88.1 88.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 88.3 Energy 0.07 1.26 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 2,246 2,246 0.26 0.02 — 2,258 Water — — — — — — — — — — 18.1 43.3 61.4 1.86 0.04 — 121 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 15.9 0.00 15.9 1.59 0.00 — 55.8 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.92 1.92
Total 10.3 6.89 71.1 0.26 0.22 29.8 30.0 0.21 7.55 7.76 34.0 26,071 26,105 4.13 0.86 7.57 26,473

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1450
19 / 113
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.50 4.77 4.17 0.01 0.20 — 0.20 0.19 — 0.19 — 657 657 0.03 0.01 — 659 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.87 0.76 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 109 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1451
20 / 113
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 132 132 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.56 135 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 123 123 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 125 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.7 23.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 24.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1452
21 / 113
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06— 1.06 0.98— 0.98— 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03— 3,437 Demolitio n————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06— 1.06 0.98— 0.98— 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03— 3,437 Demolitio n————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.50 4.77 4.17 0.01 0.20— 0.20 0.19— 0.19— 657 657 0.03 0.01— 659 Demolitio n————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.87 0.76 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.03— 0.03— 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005— 109 Demolitio n
————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————

EXHIBIT D
1453
22 / 113
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 132 132 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.56 135 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 123 123 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 125 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.7 23.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 24.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1454
23 / 113
Off-Road 3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60— 1.60 1.47— 1.47— 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04— 5,314 Equipment
Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 19.7 19.7— 10.1 10.1———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 3.94 3.61 0.01 0.18— 0.18 0.16— 0.16— 580 580 0.02 < 0.005— 582 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 2.15 2.15— 1.11 1.11———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.72 0.66 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.03— 0.03— 96.1 96.1 < 0.005 < 0.005— 96.4 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 0.39 0.39— 0.20 0.20———————
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1455
24 / 113
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.62 2.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.66 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Site Preparation (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1456
25 / 113
Daily,—————————————————
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 3.94 3.61 0.01 0.18— 0.18 0.16— 0.16— 580 580 0.02 < 0.005— 582 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 2.15 2.15— 1.11 1.11———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.72 0.66 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.03— 0.03— 96.1 96.1 < 0.005 < 0.005— 96.4 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 0.39 0.39— 0.20 0.20———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 0.06 0.04 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03— 155 155 < 0.005 0.01 0.66 157 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Average
Daily
—————————————————

EXHIBIT D
1457
26 / 113
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.62 2.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.66 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1458
27 / 113
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.06 10.3 9.09 0.02 0.44 — 0.44 0.40 — 0.40 — 1,988 1,988 0.08 0.02 — 1,995 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 2.77 2.77 — 1.10 1.10 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 1.89 1.66 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 329 329 0.01 < 0.005 — 330 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.51 0.51 — 0.20 0.20 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 177 177 < 0.005 0.01 0.75 179 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 166 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1459
28 / 113
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 49.7 49.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 50.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.23 8.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.35 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Grading (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621

EXHIBIT D
1460
29 / 113
Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 9.20 9.20— 3.65 3.65———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.06 10.3 9.09 0.02 0.44— 0.44 0.40— 0.40— 1,988 1,988 0.08 0.02— 1,995 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 2.77 2.77— 1.10 1.10———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 1.89 1.66 < 0.005 0.08— 0.08 0.07— 0.07— 329 329 0.01 < 0.005— 330 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 0.51 0.51— 0.20 0.20———————
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1461
30 / 113
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 166 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 49.7 49.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 50.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.23 8.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.35 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1462
31 / 113
Off-Road 0.13 1.21 1.41 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 258 258 0.01 < 0.005 — 259 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.22 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 42.7 42.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 42.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.83 3.53 40.8 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 9,154 9,154 0.25 0.39 1.09 9,277 Vendor 0.18 8.25 3.54 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 6,245 6,245 0.25 0.94 0.43 6,531 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.41 0.37 4.25 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 992 992 0.02 0.04 1.95 1,007 Vendor 0.02 0.87 0.38 < 0.005 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 672 672 0.03 0.10 0.77 703 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 167 Vendor < 0.005 0.16 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 111 111 < 0.005 0.02 0.13 116 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1463
32 / 113
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.21 1.41 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 258 258 0.01 < 0.005 — 259 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.22 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 42.7 42.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 42.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.83 3.53 40.8 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 9,154 9,154 0.25 0.39 1.09 9,277 Vendor 0.18 8.25 3.54 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 6,245 6,245 0.25 0.94 0.43 6,531

EXHIBIT D
1464
33 / 113
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.41 0.37 4.25 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 992 992 0.02 0.04 1.95 1,007 Vendor 0.02 0.87 0.38 < 0.005 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 672 672 0.03 0.10 0.77 703 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 0.01 0.32 167 Vendor < 0.005 0.16 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 111 111 < 0.005 0.02 0.13 116 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1465
34 / 113
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31— 0.31 0.28— 0.28— 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01— 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06— 0.06 0.05— 0.05— 284 284 0.01 < 0.005— 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.80 2.44 42.9 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 9,677 9,677 0.17 0.36 38.4 9,828 Vendor 0.19 7.53 3.29 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 6,143 6,143 0.25 0.89 16.5 6,432 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.66 3.48 38.0 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 8,976 8,976 0.25 0.39 1.00 9,099 Vendor 0.18 7.94 3.39 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 6,147 6,147 0.25 0.89 0.43 6,421 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Worker 2.59 2.23 26.3 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 0.00 1.51 1.51— 6,455 6,455 0.16 0.28 11.9 6,553 Vendor 0.13 5.56 2.39 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38— 4,389 4,389 0.18 0.64 5.10 4,589 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Worker 0.47 0.41 4.80 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28— 1,069 1,069 0.03 0.05 1.96 1,085 Vendor 0.02 1.01 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07— 727 727 0.03 0.11 0.85 760 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1466
35 / 113

3.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1467
36 / 113
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 3.80 2.44 42.9 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 9,677 9,677 0.17 0.36 38.4 9,828 Vendor 0.19 7.53 3.29 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 6,143 6,143 0.25 0.89 16.5 6,432 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.66 3.48 38.0 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 8,976 8,976 0.25 0.39 1.00 9,099 Vendor 0.18 7.94 3.39 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 6,147 6,147 0.25 0.89 0.43 6,421 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.59 2.23 26.3 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 0.00 1.51 1.51 — 6,455 6,455 0.16 0.28 11.9 6,553 Vendor 0.13 5.56 2.39 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38 — 4,389 4,389 0.18 0.64 5.10 4,589 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.47 0.41 4.80 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28 — 1,069 1,069 0.03 0.05 1.96 1,085 Vendor 0.02 1.01 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 727 727 0.03 0.11 0.85 760 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1468
37 / 113
Off-Road 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27— 0.27 0.25— 0.25— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.05— 0.05— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1469
38 / 113
Vendor 0.18 7.62 3.25 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 6,043 6,043 0.25 0.89 0.41 6,317 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.28 1.99 24.6 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 0.00 1.51 1.51 — 6,333 6,333 0.14 0.26 10.8 6,425 Vendor 0.13 5.34 2.28 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38 — 4,315 4,315 0.18 0.64 4.89 4,514 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.42 0.36 4.49 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28 — 1,049 1,049 0.02 0.04 1.78 1,064 Vendor 0.02 0.97 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 714 714 0.03 0.11 0.81 747 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1470
39 / 113
Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27— 0.27 0.25— 0.25— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.05— 0.05— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.34 2.39 40.5 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 9,493 9,493 0.17 0.36 34.9 9,640 Vendor 0.19 7.21 3.19 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 6,038 6,038 0.25 0.89 15.8 6,327 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.22 3.14 35.5 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 8,807 8,807 0.22 0.39 0.91 8,929 Vendor 0.18 7.62 3.25 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 6,043 6,043 0.25 0.89 0.41 6,317 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Worker 2.28 1.99 24.6 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 0.00 1.51 1.51— 6,333 6,333 0.14 0.26 10.8 6,425 Vendor 0.13 5.34 2.28 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38— 4,315 4,315 0.18 0.64 4.89 4,514 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Worker 0.42 0.36 4.49 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28— 1,049 1,049 0.02 0.04 1.78 1,064

EXHIBIT D
1471
40 / 113
Vendor 0.02 0.97 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 714 714 0.03 0.11 0.81 747 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 6.71 9.24 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.22 1.69 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1472
41 / 113
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.20 2.08 37.7 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 9,318 9,318 0.15 0.36 31.6 9,461 Vendor 0.19 6.92 3.06 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 5,919 5,919 0.25 0.89 14.8 6,206 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.10 2.81 33.4 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 8,645 8,645 0.22 0.39 0.82 8,766 Vendor 0.18 7.35 3.15 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 5,924 5,924 0.25 0.89 0.38 6,197 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.18 1.75 23.2 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 0.00 1.51 1.51 — 6,217 6,217 0.14 0.26 9.75 6,307 Vendor 0.13 5.14 2.22 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38 — 4,229 4,229 0.18 0.64 4.58 4,429 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.40 0.32 4.23 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28 — 1,029 1,029 0.02 0.04 1.61 1,044 Vendor 0.02 0.94 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 700 700 0.03 0.11 0.76 733 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.14. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1473
42 / 113
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34— 0.34 0.31— 0.31— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34— 0.34 0.31— 0.31— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 6.71 9.24 0.02 0.24— 0.24 0.22— 0.22— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.22 1.69 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.20 2.08 37.7 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 9,318 9,318 0.15 0.36 31.6 9,461 Vendor 0.19 6.92 3.06 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 5,919 5,919 0.25 0.89 14.8 6,206 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.10 2.81 33.4 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 8,645 8,645 0.22 0.39 0.82 8,766

EXHIBIT D
1474
43 / 113
Vendor 0.18 7.35 3.15 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 5,924 5,924 0.25 0.89 0.38 6,197 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.18 1.75 23.2 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 0.00 1.51 1.51 — 6,217 6,217 0.14 0.26 9.75 6,307 Vendor 0.13 5.14 2.22 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38 — 4,229 4,229 0.18 0.64 4.58 4,429 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.40 0.32 4.23 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28 — 1,029 1,029 0.02 0.04 1.61 1,044 Vendor 0.02 0.94 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 700 700 0.03 0.11 0.76 733 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1475
44 / 113
Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.71 6.39 9.26 0.02 0.22— 0.22 0.20— 0.20— 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01— 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.17 1.69 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 284 284 0.01 < 0.005— 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.12 2.06 35.6 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 9,152 9,152 0.15 0.07 28.4 9,206 Vendor 0.19 6.68 2.96 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 5,779 5,779 0.24 0.85 13.7 6,051 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 3.00 2.47 31.4 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17— 8,492 8,492 0.20 0.39 0.73 8,613 Vendor 0.18 7.05 3.05 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53— 5,784 5,784 0.24 0.85 0.36 6,044 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Worker 2.13 1.73 21.8 0.00 0.00 6.48 6.48 0.00 1.52 1.52— 6,123 6,123 0.12 0.26 8.77 6,213 Vendor 0.13 4.94 2.15 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38— 4,141 4,141 0.17 0.61 4.26 4,330 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Worker 0.39 0.32 3.98 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28— 1,014 1,014 0.02 0.04 1.45 1,029

EXHIBIT D
1476
45 / 113
Vendor 0.02 0.90 0.39 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 686 686 0.03 0.10 0.71 717 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.16. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.71 6.39 9.26 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.17 1.69 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1477
46 / 113
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.12 2.06 35.6 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 9,152 9,152 0.15 0.07 28.4 9,206 Vendor 0.19 6.68 2.96 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 5,779 5,779 0.24 0.85 13.7 6,051 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.00 2.47 31.4 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 8,492 8,492 0.20 0.39 0.73 8,613 Vendor 0.18 7.05 3.05 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.09 0.45 0.53 — 5,784 5,784 0.24 0.85 0.36 6,044 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.13 1.73 21.8 0.00 0.00 6.48 6.48 0.00 1.52 1.52 — 6,123 6,123 0.12 0.26 8.77 6,213 Vendor 0.13 4.94 2.15 0.03 0.06 1.14 1.20 0.06 0.32 0.38 — 4,141 4,141 0.17 0.61 4.26 4,330 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.39 0.32 3.98 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 0.00 0.28 0.28 — 1,014 1,014 0.02 0.04 1.45 1,029 Vendor 0.02 0.90 0.39 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 686 686 0.03 0.10 0.71 717 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.17. Building Construction (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1478
47 / 113
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.97 8.58 12.9 0.02 0.28 — 0.28 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.65 0.98 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 183 183 0.01 < 0.005 — 184 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.12 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 30.3 30.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.4 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.90 2.44 29.6 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 8,347 8,347 0.20 0.36 0.66 8,461 Vendor 0.14 6.76 2.95 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.04 0.45 0.49 — 5,629 5,629 0.20 0.85 0.33 5,887 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.16 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.16 0.16 — 641 641 0.01 0.03 0.83 651 Vendor 0.01 0.50 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.13 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 — 429 429 0.02 0.06 0.42 449 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1479
48 / 113
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 106 106 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 108 Vendor < 0.005 0.09 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 71.1 71.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 74.4 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.18. Building Construction (2029) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.97 8.58 12.9 0.02 0.28 — 0.28 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.65 0.98 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 183 183 0.01 < 0.005 — 184 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.12 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 30.3 30.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.4 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1480
49 / 113
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.90 2.44 29.6 0.00 0.00 9.24 9.24 0.00 2.17 2.17 — 8,347 8,347 0.20 0.36 0.66 8,461 Vendor 0.14 6.76 2.95 0.04 0.09 1.62 1.71 0.04 0.45 0.49 — 5,629 5,629 0.20 0.85 0.33 5,887 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.16 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.16 0.16 — 641 641 0.01 0.03 0.83 651 Vendor 0.01 0.50 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.13 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 — 429 429 0.02 0.06 0.42 449 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 106 106 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 108 Vendor < 0.005 0.09 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 71.1 71.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 74.4 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.19. Paving (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 6.46 9.92 0.01 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1481
50 / 113
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 6.46 9.92 0.01 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.33 2.04 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 310 310 0.01 < 0.005 — 311 Paving 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.24 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 51.4 51.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.6 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1482
51 / 113
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 114 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.2 23.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 23.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.84 3.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.20. Paving (2029) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 6.46 9.92 0.01 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 6.46 9.92 0.01 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516

EXHIBIT D
1483
52 / 113
Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.33 2.04 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 310 310 0.01 < 0.005 — 311 Paving 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.24 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 51.4 51.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.6 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 121 121 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 121 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 114 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.2 23.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 23.5

EXHIBIT D
1484
53 / 113
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.84 3.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.21. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.79 1.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings
310 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.16 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 27.4 27.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.5 Architectu
ral
Coatings

63.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1485
54 / 113
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.54 4.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.56 Architectu
ral
Coatings

11.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.59 0.34 6.76 0.00 0.00 1.85 1.85 0.00 0.43 0.43 — 1,799 1,799 0.03 0.01 5.07 1,809 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.09 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 345 345 0.01 0.01 0.45 350 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 57.2 57.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 58.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.22. Architectural Coating (2029) - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1486
55 / 113
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.79 1.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings
310 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.16 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 27.4 27.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.5 Architectu
ral
Coatings

63.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.54 4.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.56 Architectu
ral
Coatings

11.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1487
56 / 113
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.59 0.34 6.76 0.00 0.00 1.85 1.85 0.00 0.43 0.43 — 1,799 1,799 0.03 0.01 5.07 1,809 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.09 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 345 345 0.01 0.01 0.45 350 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 57.2 57.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 58.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available.

4.1.2. Mitigated
Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.5. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available.

4.2. Energy

EXHIBIT D
1488
57 / 113

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 477 477 0.08 0.01 — 482
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 860 860 0.14 0.02 — 868
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,570 1,570 0.25 0.03 — 1,585
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 469 469 0.08 0.01 — 474
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 798 798 0.13 0.02 — 806
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 676 676 0.11 0.01 — 683
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4,850 4,850 0.78 0.10 — 4,898 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1489
58 / 113
Single Family
Housing
——————————— 477 477 0.08 0.01— 482
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 860 860 0.14 0.02— 868
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 1,570 1,570 0.25 0.03— 1,585
General
Office
Building
——————————— 469 469 0.08 0.01— 474
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————— 798 798 0.13 0.02— 806
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 676 676 0.11 0.01— 683
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 4,850 4,850 0.78 0.10— 4,898
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
——————————— 79.0 79.0 0.01 < 0.005— 79.8
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 142 142 0.02 < 0.005— 144
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 260 260 0.04 0.01— 262

EXHIBIT D
1490
59 / 113
General — — — — — — — — — — — 77.6 77.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 78.4 Office
Building
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 132 132 0.02 < 0.005 — 133
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 112 112 0.02 < 0.005 — 113
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 803 803 0.13 0.02 — 811

EXHIBIT D
1491
60 / 113
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————— 798 798 0.13 0.02— 806
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 676 676 0.11 0.01— 683
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 4,850 4,850 0.78 0.10— 4,898
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
——————————— 477 477 0.08 0.01— 482
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 860 860 0.14 0.02— 868
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————— 1,570 1,570 0.25 0.03— 1,585
General
Office
Building
——————————— 469 469 0.08 0.01— 474
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————— 798 798 0.13 0.02— 806
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 676 676 0.11 0.01— 683

EXHIBIT D
1492
61 / 113
Parking — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Lot
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4,850 4,850 0.78 0.10 — 4,898 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 79.0 79.0 0.01 < 0.005 — 79.8
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 142 142 0.02 < 0.005 — 144
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 260 260 0.04 0.01 — 262
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 77.6 77.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 78.4
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 132 132 0.02 < 0.005 — 133
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 112 112 0.02 < 0.005 — 113
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 803 803 0.13 0.02 — 811

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1493
62 / 113
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.09 1.61 0.69 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,044 2,044 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,050 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.06 1.00 0.43 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,273 1,273 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,276 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.22 3.77 1.61 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.31 — 0.31 — 4,791 4,791 0.42 0.01 — 4,804 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.25 0.21 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 302 302 0.03 < 0.005 — 303 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.26 0.21 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 305 305 0.03 < 0.005 — 306 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 8,715 8,715 0.77 0.02 — 8,739 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.09 1.61 0.69 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,044 2,044 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,050

EXHIBIT D
1494
63 / 113
Apartmen
Mid Rise

0.06 1.00 0.43 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,273 1,273 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,276 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.22 3.77 1.61 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.31 — 0.31 — 4,791 4,791 0.42 0.01 — 4,804 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.25 0.21 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 302 302 0.03 < 0.005 — 303 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.26 0.21 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 305 305 0.03 < 0.005 — 306 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 8,715 8,715 0.77 0.02 — 8,739 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.02 0.29 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 338 338 0.03 < 0.005 — 339 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 211 211 0.02 < 0.005 — 211 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

EXHIBIT D
1495
64 / 113
Regional < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 50.6 50.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.7 Shopping
Center
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.07 1.26 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,443 1,443 0.13 < 0.005 — 1,447

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.09 1.61 0.69 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,044 2,044 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,050 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.06 1.00 0.43 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,273 1,273 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,276 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.22 3.77 1.61 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.31 — 0.31 — 4,791 4,791 0.42 0.01 — 4,804 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.25 0.21 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 302 302 0.03 < 0.005 — 303 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.26 0.21 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 305 305 0.03 < 0.005 — 306

EXHIBIT D
1496
65 / 113
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Total 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56— 0.56 0.56— 0.56— 8,715 8,715 0.77 0.02— 8,739 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single Family
Housing

0.09 1.61 0.69 0.01 0.13— 0.13 0.13— 0.13— 2,044 2,044 0.18 < 0.005— 2,050 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.06 1.00 0.43 0.01 0.08— 0.08 0.08— 0.08— 1,273 1,273 0.11 < 0.005— 1,276 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.22 3.77 1.61 0.02 0.31— 0.31 0.31— 0.31— 4,791 4,791 0.42 0.01— 4,804 General
Office
Building

0.01 0.25 0.21 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 302 302 0.03 < 0.005— 303 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.26 0.21 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 305 305 0.03 < 0.005— 306 Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1497
66 / 113
Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Total 0.40 6.90 3.15 0.04 0.56 — 0.56 0.56 — 0.56 — 8,715 8,715 0.77 0.02 — 8,739 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.02 0.29 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 338 338 0.03 < 0.005 — 339 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.01 0.18 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 211 211 0.02 < 0.005 — 211 Apartmen
ts
Low Rise

0.04 0.69 0.29 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 793 793 0.07 < 0.005 — 795 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 50.0 50.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.1 Regional
Shopping
Center
< 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 50.6 50.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.7 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.07 1.26 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,443 1,443 0.13 < 0.005 — 1,447

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1498
67 / 113
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.72 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Consume
r
Products

36.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

3.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

10.4 0.90 99.5 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.06 — 0.06 — 299 299 0.01 < 0.005 — 300 Total 50.7 13.2 105 0.08 1.07 — 1.07 1.05 — 1.05 0.00 15,914 15,914 0.31 0.03 — 15,931 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.72 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Consume
r
Products

36.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

3.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 40.3 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 63.7 63.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 63.8 Consume
r
Products

6.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1499
68 / 113
Architectu 0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ral
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.94 0.08 8.96 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 24.4 24.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.5 Total 8.16 0.14 8.98 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 88.1 88.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 88.3

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.72 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Consume
r
Products

36.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

3.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

36.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1500
69 / 113
Architectu 3.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ral
Total 40.3 12.3 5.23 0.08 0.99 — 0.99 0.99 — 0.99 0.00 15,615 15,615 0.29 0.03 — 15,631 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 63.7 63.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 63.8 Consume
r
Products

6.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.94 0.08 8.96 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 24.4 24.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.5 Total 8.16 0.14 8.98 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 88.1 88.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 88.3

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 9.39 79.6 89.0 0.98 0.02 — 121
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 30.7 58.0 88.6 3.16 0.08 — 190

EXHIBIT D
1501
70 / 113
Apartmen—————————— 51.0 96.3 147 5.24 0.13— 316
ts
Low Rise
General
Office
Building
—————————— 13.5 25.5 39.0 1.39 0.03— 83.7
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 23.7 44.8 68.5 2.44 0.06— 147
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 128 304 432 13.2 0.32— 857
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 9.39 79.6 89.0 0.98 0.02— 121
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 30.7 58.0 88.6 3.16 0.08— 190
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 51.0 96.3 147 5.24 0.13— 316
General
Office
Building
—————————— 13.5 25.5 39.0 1.39 0.03— 83.7

EXHIBIT D
1502
71 / 113
Regional—————————— 23.7 44.8 68.5 2.44 0.06— 147
Shopping
Center
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 128 304 432 13.2 0.32— 857
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 1.55 13.2 14.7 0.16 < 0.005— 20.0
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 5.08 9.60 14.7 0.52 0.01— 31.5
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 8.44 15.9 24.4 0.87 0.02— 52.3
General
Office
Building
—————————— 2.24 4.22 6.46 0.23 0.01— 13.9
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 3.93 7.42 11.3 0.40 0.01— 24.3
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1503
72 / 113
Other — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Total — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 50.4 71.6 2.19 0.05 — 142

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 7.98 70.8 78.8 0.83 0.02 — 106
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 26.1 49.3 75.4 2.68 0.06 — 162
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 43.3 81.8 125 4.46 0.11 — 268
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 11.5 21.7 33.1 1.18 0.03 — 71.1
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 20.2 38.1 58.3 2.07 0.05 — 125
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1504
73 / 113
Total—————————— 109 262 371 11.2 0.27— 732
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 7.98 70.8 78.8 0.83 0.02— 106
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 26.1 49.3 75.4 2.68 0.06— 162
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 43.3 81.8 125 4.46 0.11— 268
General
Office
Building
—————————— 11.5 21.7 33.1 1.18 0.03— 71.1
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 20.2 38.1 58.3 2.07 0.05— 125
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 109 262 371 11.2 0.27— 732
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 1.32 11.7 13.0 0.14 < 0.005— 17.5
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 4.32 8.16 12.5 0.44 0.01— 26.8

EXHIBIT D
1505
74 / 113
Apartmen
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 7.17 13.5 20.7 0.74 0.02 — 44.4
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 1.90 3.59 5.49 0.20 < 0.005 — 11.8
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 3.34 6.31 9.65 0.34 0.01 — 20.7
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 18.1 43.3 61.4 1.86 0.04 — 121

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 49.0 0.00 49.0 4.90 0.00 — 171
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 180 0.00 180 18.0 0.00 — 629

EXHIBIT D
1506
75 / 113
Apartmen—————————— 298 0.00 298 29.8 0.00— 1,044
ts
General
Office
Building
—————————— 19.9 0.00 19.9 1.99 0.00— 69.5
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 94.6 0.00 94.6 9.46 0.00— 331
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 642 0.00 642 64.1 0.00— 2,245
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 49.0 0.00 49.0 4.90 0.00— 171
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 180 0.00 180 18.0 0.00— 629
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 298 0.00 298 29.8 0.00— 1,044
General
Office
Building
—————————— 19.9 0.00 19.9 1.99 0.00— 69.5
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 94.6 0.00 94.6 9.46 0.00— 331

EXHIBIT D
1507
76 / 113
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 642 0.00 642 64.1 0.00— 2,245
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 8.11 0.00 8.11 0.81 0.00— 28.4
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 29.8 0.00 29.8 2.97 0.00— 104
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 49.4 0.00 49.4 4.94 0.00— 173
General
Office
Building
—————————— 3.29 0.00 3.29 0.33 0.00— 11.5
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 15.7 0.00 15.7 1.57 0.00— 54.8
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 106 0.00 106 10.6 0.00— 372

EXHIBIT D
1508
77 / 113

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — 7.35 0.00 7.35 0.73 0.00 — 25.7
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 27.0 0.00 27.0 2.69 0.00 — 94.3
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 44.8 0.00 44.8 4.47 0.00 — 157
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — 2.98 0.00 2.98 0.30 0.00 — 10.4
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 14.2 0.00 14.2 1.42 0.00 — 49.7
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 96.3 0.00 96.3 9.62 0.00 — 337 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1509
78 / 113
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 7.35 0.00 7.35 0.73 0.00— 25.7
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 27.0 0.00 27.0 2.69 0.00— 94.3
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 44.8 0.00 44.8 4.47 0.00— 157
General
Office
Building
—————————— 2.98 0.00 2.98 0.30 0.00— 10.4
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 14.2 0.00 14.2 1.42 0.00— 49.7
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 96.3 0.00 96.3 9.62 0.00— 337
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
—————————— 1.22 0.00 1.22 0.12 0.00— 4.26
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 4.46 0.00 4.46 0.45 0.00— 15.6
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
—————————— 7.41 0.00 7.41 0.74 0.00— 25.9

EXHIBIT D
1510
79 / 113
General — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.00 0.49 0.05 0.00 — 1.73 Office
Building
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 2.35 0.00 2.35 0.23 0.00 — 8.22
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 15.9 0.00 15.9 1.59 0.00 — 55.8

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.93 1.93
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.10 3.10
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.69 5.69

EXHIBIT D
1511
80 / 113
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 0.10 0.10
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————————— 0.80 0.80
Total——————————————— 11.6 11.6
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
——————————————— 1.93 1.93
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 3.10 3.10
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 5.69 5.69
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 0.10 0.10
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————————— 0.80 0.80
Total——————————————— 11.6 11.6
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
——————————————— 0.32 0.32
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 0.51 0.51
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 0.94 0.94

EXHIBIT D
1512
81 / 113
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.92 1.92

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.93 1.93
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.10 3.10
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.69 5.69
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.10 0.10
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.80 0.80
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.6 11.6
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1513
82 / 113
Single——————————————— 1.93 1.93
Family
Housing
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 3.10 3.10
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 5.69 5.69
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 0.10 0.10
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————————— 0.80 0.80
Total——————————————— 11.6 11.6
Annual—————————————————
Single Family
Housing
——————————————— 0.32 0.32
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————————— 0.51 0.51
Apartmen
ts
Low Rise
——————————————— 0.94 0.94
General
Office
Building
——————————————— 0.02 0.02
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————————— 0.13 0.13
Total——————————————— 1.92 1.92

EXHIBIT D
1514
83 / 113

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1515
84 / 113
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1516
85 / 113
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1517
86 / 113
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1518
87 / 113
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1519
88 / 113
Sequeste — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
red
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1520
89 / 113

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1521
90 / 113
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 1/1/2024 4/8/2024 5.00 70.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/9/2024 6/4/2024 5.00 40.0 — Grading Grading 6/5/2024 11/6/2024 5.00 110 —

EXHIBIT D
1522
91 / 113
Building Construction Building Construction 11/7/2024 2/8/2029 5.00 1,110 — Paving Paving 2/9/2029 5/25/2029 5.00 75.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2029 9/8/2029 5.00 75.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36

EXHIBIT D
1523
92 / 113
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

EXHIBIT D
1524
93 / 113

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 1,117 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 231 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT

EXHIBIT D
1525
94 / 113
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 223 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 1,117 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2

EXHIBIT D
1526
95 / 113
Building Construction Vendor 231 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 223 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 3,029,400 1,009,800 310,245 103,415 5,672

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres)

EXHIBIT D
1527
96 / 113
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Site Preparation — — 60.0 0.00 —
Grading — — 330 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.69

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 1.52 0%
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Apartments Low Rise — 0%
General Office Building 0.00 0%
Regional Shopping Center 0.00 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 100%
Parking Lot 0.00 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 2.17 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2028 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

EXHIBIT D
1528
97 / 113
2029 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 235,940 235,940 235,940 86,118,100

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 227,340 227,340 227,340 82,978,947

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 28
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 110
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0

EXHIBIT D
1529
98 / 113
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 230
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 221
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 382
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 367
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Single Family Housing—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 28

EXHIBIT D
1530
99 / 113
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 110
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 230
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 221
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Low Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 382
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 367
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

EXHIBIT D
1531
100 / 113

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
3029400 1,009,800 310,245 103,415 5,672

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 853,510 204 0.0330 0.0040 6,378,625 Apartments Mid Rise 1,538,564 204 0.0330 0.0040 3,970,636 Apartments Low Rise 2,809,115 204 0.0330 0.0040 14,949,521 General Office Building 839,125 204 0.0330 0.0040 941,461 Regional Shopping Center 1,428,634 204 0.0330 0.0040 952,745 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1,209,313 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1532
101 / 113
Parking Lot 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 853,510 204 0.0330 0.0040 6,378,625 Apartments Mid Rise 1,538,564 204 0.0330 0.0040 3,970,636 Apartments Low Rise 2,809,115 204 0.0330 0.0040 14,949,521 General Office Building 839,125 204 0.0330 0.0040 941,461 Regional Shopping Center 1,428,634 204 0.0330 0.0040 952,745 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1,209,313 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 4,900,497 22,445,036
Apartments Mid Rise 16,015,393 0.00
Apartments Low Rise 26,597,627 0.00
General Office Building 7,045,366 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 12,384,185 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1533
102 / 113

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 4,165,423 20,200,532
Apartments Mid Rise 13,613,084 0.00
Apartments Low Rise 22,607,983 0.00
General Office Building 5,988,561 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 10,526,557 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 90.9 —
Apartments Mid Rise 334 —
Apartments Low Rise 554 —
General Office Building 36.9 —
Regional Shopping Center 176 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)

EXHIBIT D
1534
103 / 113
Single Family Housing 13.6 —
Apartments Mid Rise 50.0 —
Apartments Low Rise 83.1 —
General Office Building 5.53 —
Regional Shopping Center 26.3 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00

EXHIBIT D
1535
104 / 113
General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 and heat pumps
Regional Shopping
Center
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

EXHIBIT D
1536
105 / 113

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

EXHIBIT D
1537
106 / 113

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 16.2 annual days of extreme heat

EXHIBIT D
1538
107 / 113
Extreme Precipitation 2.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 18.8 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.

Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

EXHIBIT D
1539
108 / 113
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 1 1 2
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 37.8
AQ-PM 20.1
AQ-DPM 8.90
Drinking Water 54.0
Lead Risk Housing 4.86
Pesticides 52.7

EXHIBIT D
1540
109 / 113
Toxic Releases 31.9
Traffic 89.6
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 7.19
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 76.8
Impaired Water Bodies 23.9
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 24.3
Cardio-vascular 34.2
Low Birth Weights 40.9
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 12.0
Housing 1.29
Linguistic 30.7
Poverty 8.68
Unemployment 30.9

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 88.28435776
Employed 88.70781471
Median HI 88.66931862
Education —

EXHIBIT D
1541
110 / 113
Bachelor's or higher 64.48094444
High school enrollment 13.5249583
Preschool enrollment 95.7141024
Transportation—
Auto Access 67.17567047
Active commuting 50.09624022
Social—
2-parent households 97.21544976
Voting 59.77158989
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 97.0101373
Park access 44.4629796
Retail density 7.442576671
Supermarket access 10.58642371
Tree canopy 22.91800334
Housing—
Homeownership 95.99640703
Housing habitability 93.16052868
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 71.74387271 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 74.51559091
Uncrowded housing 79.21211344
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 80.68779674
Arthritis 73.2
Asthma ER Admissions 67.9
High Blood Pressure 95.4
Cancer (excluding skin) 45.0

EXHIBIT D
1542
111 / 113
Asthma 61.7
Coronary Heart Disease 87.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 79.3
Diagnosed Diabetes 91.2
Life Expectancy at Birth 21.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 85.5
Heart Attack ER Admissions 58.5
Mental Health Not Good 68.6
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 69.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 82.3
Stroke 91.3
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 5.9
Current Smoker 64.6
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 85.0
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 88.9
English Speaking 71.6
Foreign-born 23.2
Outdoor Workers 44.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity—

EXHIBIT D
1543
112 / 113
Impervious Surface Cover 69.4
Traffic Density 76.5
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 15.1
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 60.4

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 18.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 88.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification

EXHIBIT D
1544
113 / 113
Land Use Based on applicant provided information
Operations: Architectural Coatings Based on BAAQMD Reg 8 Rule 3

EXHIBIT D
1545
Appendix B-2
Isabel Crossing Parcels – Proposed Isabel Crossing Project

EXHIBIT D
1546
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 1 / 99
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1547
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 2 / 99

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.4. Site Preparation (2024) - Mitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.6. Grading (2024) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.12. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.14. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.15. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.16. Paving (2027) - Mitigated

3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

3.18. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

EXHIBIT D
1548
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 3 / 99

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1549
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 4 / 99

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1550
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 5 / 99

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

EXHIBIT D
1551
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 6 / 99

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1552
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 7 / 99

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1553
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 8 / 99

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

EXHIBIT D
1554
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 9 / 99

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data

EXHIBIT D
1555
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 10 / 99

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Harridge Development Project Operations
Construction Start Date 1/1/2024
Operational Year 2040
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 33.2
Location 37.70623392502735, -121.79859974891373
County Alameda
City Livermore
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 1677
EDFZ 1
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.20

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description

EXHIBIT D
1556
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 11 / 99
Condo/Townhouse
High Rise
545 Dwelling Unit 25.8 865,072 0.00 — 1,537 —
Apartments Mid Rise 716 Dwelling Unit 9.07 941,692 0.00 — 2,019 — Regional Shopping
Center

81.9 1000sqft 0.00 81,897 0.00 — — —
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
1,023 Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 237 Space 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

10.5 Acre 10.5 0.00 0.00 — — —

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 566 36.0 54.1 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 14,659 14,659 0.42 0.92 45.8 14,991 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1557
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 12 / 99
Unmit. 566 36.0 49.5 0.05 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 14,064 14,064 0.46 0.95 1.19 14,358 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 86.7 19.0 32.8 0.04 0.73 6.13 6.75 0.67 2.18 2.86 — 9,929 9,929 0.32 0.66 13.2 10,146 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 15.8 3.46 5.99 0.01 0.13 1.12 1.23 0.12 0.40 0.52 — 1,644 1,644 0.05 0.11 2.19 1,680

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.67 36.0 54.1 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 14,659 14,659 0.42 0.92 45.8 14,991 2025 4.43 17.3 51.1 0.05 0.49 8.77 9.25 0.45 2.10 2.55 — 14,435 14,435 0.40 0.90 42.7 14,755 2026 3.99 16.5 48.8 0.05 0.43 8.77 9.20 0.40 2.10 2.50 — 14,214 14,214 0.40 0.90 39.4 14,531 2027 566 15.6 46.5 0.05 0.39 8.77 9.16 0.36 2.10 2.46 — 13,990 13,990 0.38 0.90 35.9 14,303 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.52 36.0 49.5 0.05 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 14,064 14,064 0.46 0.95 1.19 14,358 2025 4.30 18.5 47.0 0.05 0.49 8.77 9.25 0.45 2.10 2.55 — 13,852 13,852 0.46 0.92 1.11 14,139 2026 3.88 17.4 44.7 0.05 0.43 8.77 9.20 0.40 2.10 2.50 — 13,644 13,644 0.44 0.92 1.02 13,929 2027 566 16.5 42.9 0.05 0.39 8.77 9.16 0.36 2.10 2.46 — 13,431 13,431 0.44 0.92 0.93 13,716 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 2.69 19.0 26.0 0.04 0.73 6.02 6.75 0.67 2.18 2.86 — 6,356 6,356 0.22 0.29 5.77 6,454 2025 3.06 12.9 32.8 0.04 0.35 6.13 6.48 0.32 1.47 1.79 — 9,929 9,929 0.32 0.66 13.2 10,146

EXHIBIT D
1558
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 13 / 99
2026 2.76 12.1 31.3 0.04 0.31 6.13 6.44 0.29 1.47 1.75 — 9,780 9,780 0.30 0.64 12.1 9,990 2027 86.7 6.30 15.8 0.02 0.17 2.95 3.12 0.16 0.70 0.86 — 4,731 4,731 0.15 0.29 5.26 4,828 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.49 3.46 4.74 0.01 0.13 1.10 1.23 0.12 0.40 0.52 — 1,052 1,052 0.04 0.05 0.95 1,068 2025 0.56 2.35 5.99 0.01 0.06 1.12 1.18 0.06 0.27 0.33 — 1,644 1,644 0.05 0.11 2.19 1,680 2026 0.50 2.21 5.71 0.01 0.06 1.12 1.18 0.05 0.27 0.32 — 1,619 1,619 0.05 0.11 2.01 1,654 2027 15.8 1.15 2.88 < 0.005 0.03 0.54 0.57 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 783 783 0.02 0.05 0.87 799

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.67 36.0 54.1 0.06 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 14,659 14,659 0.42 0.92 45.8 14,991 2025 4.43 17.3 51.1 0.05 0.49 8.77 9.25 0.45 2.10 2.55 — 14,435 14,435 0.40 0.90 42.7 14,755 2026 3.99 16.5 48.8 0.05 0.43 8.77 9.20 0.40 2.10 2.50 — 14,214 14,214 0.40 0.90 39.4 14,531 2027 566 15.6 46.5 0.05 0.39 8.77 9.16 0.36 2.10 2.46 — 13,990 13,990 0.38 0.90 35.9 14,303 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.52 36.0 49.5 0.05 1.60 19.8 21.4 1.47 10.1 11.6 — 14,064 14,064 0.46 0.95 1.19 14,358 2025 4.30 18.5 47.0 0.05 0.49 8.77 9.25 0.45 2.10 2.55 — 13,852 13,852 0.46 0.92 1.11 14,139 2026 3.88 17.4 44.7 0.05 0.43 8.77 9.20 0.40 2.10 2.50 — 13,644 13,644 0.44 0.92 1.02 13,929 2027 566 16.5 42.9 0.05 0.39 8.77 9.16 0.36 2.10 2.46 — 13,431 13,431 0.44 0.92 0.93 13,716 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 2.69 19.0 26.0 0.04 0.73 6.02 6.75 0.67 2.18 2.86 — 6,356 6,356 0.22 0.29 5.77 6,454 2025 3.06 12.9 32.8 0.04 0.35 6.13 6.48 0.32 1.47 1.79 — 9,929 9,929 0.32 0.66 13.2 10,146

EXHIBIT D
1559
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 14 / 99
2026 2.76 12.1 31.3 0.04 0.31 6.13 6.44 0.29 1.47 1.75 — 9,780 9,780 0.30 0.64 12.1 9,990 2027 86.7 6.30 15.8 0.02 0.17 2.95 3.12 0.16 0.70 0.86 — 4,731 4,731 0.15 0.29 5.26 4,828 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.49 3.46 4.74 0.01 0.13 1.10 1.23 0.12 0.40 0.52 — 1,052 1,052 0.04 0.05 0.95 1,068 2025 0.56 2.35 5.99 0.01 0.06 1.12 1.18 0.06 0.27 0.33 — 1,644 1,644 0.05 0.11 2.19 1,680 2026 0.50 2.21 5.71 0.01 0.06 1.12 1.18 0.05 0.27 0.32 — 1,619 1,619 0.05 0.11 2.01 1,654 2027 15.8 1.15 2.88 < 0.005 0.03 0.54 0.57 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 783 783 0.02 0.05 0.87 799

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 62.9 38.4 420 1.32 1.77 136 138 1.73 34.6 36.3 646 146,586 147,233 68.1 4.12 78.0 150,241 Mit. 62.9 38.4 420 1.32 1.77 136 138 1.73 34.6 36.3 165 146,559 146,724 20.0 4.08 78.0 148,518 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 74% < 0.5% < 0.5% 71% 1% — 1%
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 55.8 41.4 277 1.24 1.74 136 138 1.71 34.6 36.3 646 138,974 139,621 68.0 4.39 15.0 142,644 Mit. 55.8 41.4 277 1.24 1.74 136 138 1.71 34.6 36.3 165 138,947 139,112 19.8 4.36 15.0 140,921 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 74% < 0.5% < 0.5% 71% 1% — 1%
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 58.5 28.2 315 1.17 0.77 133 134 0.74 33.8 34.6 646 124,340 124,986 67.7 4.26 41.3 127,990 Mit. 58.5 28.2 315 1.17 0.77 133 134 0.74 33.8 34.6 165 124,312 124,477 19.6 4.22 41.3 126,267

EXHIBIT D
1560
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 15 / 99
%
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 74% < 0.5% < 0.5% 71% 1% — 1%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 10.7 5.15 57.4 0.21 0.14 24.4 24.5 0.13 6.18 6.31 107 20,586 20,693 11.2 0.71 6.83 21,190 Mit. 10.7 5.15 57.4 0.21 0.14 24.4 24.5 0.13 6.18 6.31 27.3 20,581 20,609 3.24 0.70 6.83 20,905 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — 74% < 0.5% < 0.5% 71% 1% — 1%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 9.70 22.4 338 1.22 0.49 136 137 0.46 34.6 35.0 — 123,896 123,896 2.12 3.79 64.7 125,141 Area 53.1 13.1 80.8 0.08 1.04 — 1.04 1.04 — 1.04 0.00 16,004 16,004 0.31 0.03 — 16,021 Energy 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 6,503 6,503 0.78 0.06 — 6,541 Water — — — — — — — — — — 97.4 184 281 10.0 0.24 — 604
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 549 0.00 549 54.9 0.00 — 1,920 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Total 62.9 38.4 420 1.32 1.77 136 138 1.73 34.6 36.3 646 146,586 147,233 68.1 4.12 78.0 150,241 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 9.35 26.0 271 1.14 0.49 136 137 0.46 34.6 35.0 — 116,489 116,489 2.02 4.06 1.68 117,752 Area 46.3 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Energy 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 6,503 6,503 0.78 0.06 — 6,541 Water — — — — — — — — — — 97.4 184 281 10.0 0.24 — 604
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 549 0.00 549 54.9 0.00 — 1,920

EXHIBIT D
1561
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 16 / 99
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Total 55.8 41.4 277 1.24 1.74 136 138 1.71 34.6 36.3 646 138,974 139,621 68.0 4.39 15.0 142,644 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 9.46 24.6 276 1.15 0.49 133 134 0.46 33.8 34.3 — 117,162 117,162 2.05 3.96 27.9 118,420 Area 48.9 0.65 37.3 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 0.00 491 491 0.01 < 0.005 — 492 Energy 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 6,503 6,503 0.78 0.06 — 6,541 Water — — — — — — — — — — 97.4 184 281 10.0 0.24 — 604
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 549 0.00 549 54.9 0.00 — 1,920 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Total 58.5 28.2 315 1.17 0.77 133 134 0.74 33.8 34.6 646 124,340 124,986 67.7 4.26 41.3 127,990 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.73 4.50 50.4 0.21 0.09 24.4 24.4 0.08 6.18 6.26 — 19,397 19,397 0.34 0.66 4.63 19,606 Area 8.92 0.12 6.82 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 81.3 81.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.4 Energy 0.03 0.53 0.24 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 1,077 1,077 0.13 0.01 — 1,083 Water — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 30.5 46.6 1.66 0.04 — 100.0 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 90.9 0.00 90.9 9.08 0.00 — 318 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21 2.21
Total 10.7 5.15 57.4 0.21 0.14 24.4 24.5 0.13 6.18 6.31 107 20,586 20,693 11.2 0.71 6.83 21,190

EXHIBIT D
1562
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 17 / 99
Energy 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 6,503 6,503 0.78 0.06 — 6,541 Water — — — — — — — — — — 82.8 156 239 8.52 0.20 — 513
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 82.3 0.00 82.3 8.23 0.00 — 288 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Total 62.9 38.4 420 1.32 1.77 136 138 1.73 34.6 36.3 165 146,559 146,724 20.0 4.08 78.0 148,518 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 9.35 26.0 271 1.14 0.49 136 137 0.46 34.6 35.0 — 116,489 116,489 2.02 4.06 1.68 117,752 Area 46.3 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Energy 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 6,503 6,503 0.78 0.06 — 6,541 Water — — — — — — — — — — 82.8 156 239 8.52 0.20 — 513
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 82.3 0.00 82.3 8.23 0.00 — 288 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Total 55.8 41.4 277 1.24 1.74 136 138 1.71 34.6 36.3 165 138,947 139,112 19.8 4.36 15.0 140,921 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 9.46 24.6 276 1.15 0.49 133 134 0.46 33.8 34.3 — 117,162 117,162 2.05 3.96 27.9 118,420 Area 48.9 0.65 37.3 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 0.00 491 491 0.01 < 0.005 — 492 Energy 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 6,503 6,503 0.78 0.06 — 6,541 Water — — — — — — — — — — 82.8 156 239 8.52 0.20 — 513
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 82.3 0.00 82.3 8.23 0.00 — 288 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Total 58.5 28.2 315 1.17 0.77 133 134 0.74 33.8 34.6 165 124,312 124,477 19.6 4.22 41.3 126,267 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.73 4.50 50.4 0.21 0.09 24.4 24.4 0.08 6.18 6.26 — 19,397 19,397 0.34 0.66 4.63 19,606 Area 8.92 0.12 6.82 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 81.3 81.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.4 Energy 0.03 0.53 0.24 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 1,077 1,077 0.13 0.01 — 1,083 Water — — — — — — — — — — 13.7 25.9 39.6 1.41 0.03 — 85.0

EXHIBIT D
1563
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 18 / 99
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 13.6 0.00 13.6 1.36 0.00 — 47.7 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21 2.21
Total 10.7 5.15 57.4 0.21 0.14 24.4 24.5 0.13 6.18 6.31 27.3 20,581 20,609 3.24 0.70 6.83 20,905

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 3.41 2.98 < 0.005 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 469 469 0.02 < 0.005 — 471 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1564
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 19 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.62 0.54 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 77.7 77.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 77.9 Demolitio
n
— — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 123 123 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 125 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1565
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 20 / 99
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06— 1.06 0.98— 0.98— 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03— 3,437 Demolitio n————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 3.41 2.98 < 0.005 0.15— 0.15 0.13— 0.13— 469 469 0.02 < 0.005— 471 Demolitio n————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.62 0.54 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.02— 0.02— 77.7 77.7 < 0.005 < 0.005— 77.9 Demolitio n————— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00———————
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1566
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 21 / 99
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 123 123 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 125 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.81 2.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1567
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 22 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60— 1.60 1.47— 1.47— 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04— 5,314 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 19.7 19.7— 10.1 10.1———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 2.96 2.71 < 0.005 0.13— 0.13 0.12— 0.12— 435 435 0.02 < 0.005— 437 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 1.62 1.62— 0.83 0.83———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.54 0.49 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 72.1 72.1 < 0.005 < 0.005— 72.3 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 0.29 0.29— 0.15 0.15———————
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1568
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 23 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 143 143 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 145 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.9 11.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.96 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1569
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 24 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60— 1.60 1.47— 1.47— 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04— 5,314 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 19.7 19.7— 10.1 10.1———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 2.96 2.71 < 0.005 0.13— 0.13 0.12— 0.12— 435 435 0.02 < 0.005— 437 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 1.62 1.62— 0.83 0.83———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.54 0.49 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 72.1 72.1 < 0.005 < 0.005— 72.3 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 0.29 0.29— 0.15 0.15———————
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1570
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 25 / 99
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 143 143 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 145 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.9 11.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.96 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621

EXHIBIT D
1571
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 26 / 99
Dust————— 9.20 9.20— 3.65 3.65———————
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.72 7.05 6.20 0.01 0.30— 0.30 0.27— 0.27— 1,356 1,356 0.05 0.01— 1,360 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 1.89 1.89— 0.75 0.75———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.29 1.13 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.05— 0.05— 224 224 0.01 < 0.005— 225 Dust From
Material
Movement
————— 0.35 0.35— 0.14 0.14———————
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1572
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 27 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 34.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.61 5.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1573
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 28 / 99
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.72 7.05 6.20 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,356 1,356 0.05 0.01 — 1,360 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 1.89 1.89 — 0.75 0.75 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.29 1.13 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 224 224 0.01 < 0.005 — 225 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.35 0.35 — 0.14 0.14 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 177 177 < 0.005 0.01 0.75 179 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 34.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1574
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 29 / 99
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.61 5.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 3.21 3.75 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 685 685 0.03 0.01 — 687 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1575
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 30 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.59 0.68 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.34 2.30 38.8 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 8,251 8,251 0.16 0.30 35.1 8,380 Vendor 0.12 5.04 2.21 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 4,011 4,011 0.16 0.60 10.7 4,205 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.20 2.95 34.1 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,652 7,652 0.21 0.32 0.91 7,755 Vendor 0.12 5.30 2.28 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 4,014 4,014 0.16 0.60 0.28 4,198 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.90 0.83 9.43 0.00 0.00 2.16 2.16 0.00 0.51 0.51 — 2,201 2,201 0.05 0.09 4.33 2,234 Vendor 0.03 1.49 0.64 0.01 0.02 0.29 0.31 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 1,146 1,146 0.05 0.17 1.31 1,200 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.16 0.15 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 364 364 0.01 0.02 0.72 370 Vendor 0.01 0.27 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 190 190 0.01 0.03 0.22 199 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

EXHIBIT D
1576
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 31 / 99
Onsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50— 0.50 0.46— 0.46— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50— 0.50 0.46— 0.46— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 3.21 3.75 0.01 0.14— 0.14 0.13— 0.13— 685 685 0.03 0.01— 687 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.59 0.68 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.02— 0.02— 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005— 114 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1577
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 32 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.20 2.95 34.1 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,652 7,652 0.21 0.32 0.91 7,755 Vendor 0.12 5.30 2.28 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 4,014 4,014 0.16 0.60 0.28 4,198 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.90 0.83 9.43 0.00 0.00 2.16 2.16 0.00 0.51 0.51 — 2,201 2,201 0.05 0.09 4.33 2,234 Vendor 0.03 1.49 0.64 0.01 0.02 0.29 0.31 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 1,146 1,146 0.05 0.17 1.31 1,200 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.16 0.15 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 364 364 0.01 0.02 0.72 370 Vendor 0.01 0.27 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 190 190 0.01 0.03 0.22 199 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1578
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 33 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31— 0.31 0.28— 0.28— 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01— 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06— 0.06 0.05— 0.05— 284 284 0.01 < 0.005— 285 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1579
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 34 / 99
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.40 0.34 4.01 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 893 893 0.02 0.04 1.64 907 Vendor 0.02 0.65 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 467 467 0.02 0.07 0.54 488 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1580
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 35 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.18 2.04 35.9 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 8,089 8,089 0.14 0.30 32.1 8,215 Vendor 0.12 4.84 2.12 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 3,948 3,948 0.16 0.58 10.6 4,134 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.06 2.91 31.8 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,504 7,504 0.21 0.32 0.83 7,606 Vendor 0.12 5.10 2.18 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 3,951 3,951 0.16 0.58 0.28 4,127 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.17 1.86 22.0 0.00 0.00 5.40 5.40 0.00 1.26 1.26 — 5,396 5,396 0.13 0.23 9.92 5,478 Vendor 0.09 3.57 1.53 0.02 0.04 0.73 0.77 0.04 0.20 0.24 — 2,821 2,821 0.11 0.41 3.28 2,949 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.40 0.34 4.01 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 893 893 0.02 0.04 1.64 907 Vendor 0.02 0.65 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 467 467 0.02 0.07 0.54 488 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1581
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 36 / 99
Onsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27— 0.27 0.25— 0.25— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.05— 0.05— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1582
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 37 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.69 2.63 29.7 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,362 7,362 0.19 0.32 0.76 7,464 Vendor 0.12 4.90 2.09 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 3,884 3,884 0.16 0.58 0.26 4,060 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.91 1.66 20.6 0.00 0.00 5.40 5.40 0.00 1.26 1.26 — 5,294 5,294 0.12 0.22 9.01 5,371 Vendor 0.09 3.43 1.47 0.02 0.04 0.73 0.77 0.04 0.20 0.24 — 2,773 2,773 0.11 0.41 3.14 2,901 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.30 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 877 877 0.02 0.04 1.49 889 Vendor 0.02 0.63 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 459 459 0.02 0.07 0.52 480 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1583
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 38 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27— 0.27 0.25— 0.25— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.05— 0.05— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 2.79 2.00 33.8 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81— 7,936 7,936 0.14 0.30 29.2 8,059 Vendor 0.12 4.63 2.05 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34— 3,881 3,881 0.16 0.58 10.2 4,066 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Worker 2.69 2.63 29.7 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81— 7,362 7,362 0.19 0.32 0.76 7,464 Vendor 0.12 4.90 2.09 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34— 3,884 3,884 0.16 0.58 0.26 4,060 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Worker 1.91 1.66 20.6 0.00 0.00 5.40 5.40 0.00 1.26 1.26— 5,294 5,294 0.12 0.22 9.01 5,371 Vendor 0.09 3.43 1.47 0.02 0.04 0.73 0.77 0.04 0.20 0.24— 2,773 2,773 0.11 0.41 3.14 2,901

EXHIBIT D
1584
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 39 / 99
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.30 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 877 877 0.02 0.04 1.49 889 Vendor 0.02 0.63 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 459 459 0.02 0.07 0.52 480 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 2.96 4.08 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 755 755 0.03 0.01 — 758 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1585
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 40 / 99
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.54 0.74 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 125 125 0.01 < 0.005 — 125 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.67 1.74 31.5 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,789 7,789 0.12 0.30 26.4 7,909 Vendor 0.12 4.45 1.97 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 3,804 3,804 0.16 0.58 9.50 3,989 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.59 2.35 27.9 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,227 7,227 0.19 0.32 0.69 7,328 Vendor 0.12 4.72 2.02 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 3,807 3,807 0.16 0.58 0.25 3,983 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.80 0.64 8.54 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 0.00 0.56 0.56 — 2,292 2,292 0.05 0.10 3.59 2,326 Vendor 0.04 1.46 0.63 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.34 0.02 0.09 0.11 — 1,199 1,199 0.05 0.18 1.30 1,256 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.12 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 380 380 0.01 0.02 0.59 385 Vendor 0.01 0.27 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 199 199 0.01 0.03 0.21 208 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1586
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 41 / 99
Onsite—————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34— 0.34 0.31— 0.31— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34— 0.34 0.31— 0.31— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 2.96 4.08 0.01 0.11— 0.11 0.10— 0.10— 755 755 0.03 0.01— 758 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual—————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.54 0.74 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 125 125 0.01 < 0.005— 125 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1587
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 42 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.59 2.35 27.9 0.00 0.00 7.72 7.72 0.00 1.81 1.81 — 7,227 7,227 0.19 0.32 0.69 7,328 Vendor 0.12 4.72 2.02 0.03 0.05 1.04 1.10 0.05 0.29 0.34 — 3,807 3,807 0.16 0.58 0.25 3,983 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.80 0.64 8.54 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 0.00 0.56 0.56 — 2,292 2,292 0.05 0.10 3.59 2,326 Vendor 0.04 1.46 0.63 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.34 0.02 0.09 0.11 — 1,199 1,199 0.05 0.18 1.30 1,256 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.12 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 380 380 0.01 0.02 0.59 385 Vendor 0.01 0.27 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 199 199 0.01 0.03 0.21 208 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1588
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 43 / 99
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 1.05 1.50 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 228 228 0.01 < 0.005 — 228 Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.19 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.8 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 125 125 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 127 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1589
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 44 / 99
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.91 2.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.16. Paving (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 1.05 1.50 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 228 228 0.01 < 0.005 — 228 Paving 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.19 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.8 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1590
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 45 / 99
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 125 125 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 127 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.91 2.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.17. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1591
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 46 / 99
Off-Road 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Equipment
Architectu
ral
Coatings
565 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings
565 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.13 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 Architectu
ral
Coatings

85.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.34 Architectu
ral
Coatings

15.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1592
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 47 / 99
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.53 0.35 6.31 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.54 0.00 0.36 0.36 — 1,558 1,558 0.02 0.06 5.28 1,582 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.52 0.47 5.59 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.54 0.00 0.36 0.36 — 1,445 1,445 0.04 0.06 0.14 1,466 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.06 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 219 219 < 0.005 0.01 0.34 222 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 36.3 36.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 36.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.18. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1593
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 48 / 99
Off-Road 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Equipment
Architectu
ral
Coatings
565 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectu
ral
Coatings
565 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.13 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 Architectu
ral
Coatings

85.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

15.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1594
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 49 / 99
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.53 0.35 6.31 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.54 0.00 0.36 0.36 — 1,558 1,558 0.02 0.06 5.28 1,582 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.52 0.47 5.59 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.54 0.00 0.36 0.36 — 1,445 1,445 0.04 0.06 0.14 1,466 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.06 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 219 219 < 0.005 0.01 0.34 222 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 36.3 36.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 36.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available.

4.1.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1595
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 50 / 99
Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.5. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available.

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,039 1,039 0.17 0.02 — 1,049
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,365 1,365 0.22 0.03 — 1,379
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 391 391 0.06 0.01 — 395
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2,795 2,795 0.45 0.05 — 2,823 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,039 1,039 0.17 0.02 — 1,049

EXHIBIT D
1596
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 51 / 99
Apartmen
Mid Rise
——————————— 1,365 1,365 0.22 0.03— 1,379
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————— 391 391 0.06 0.01— 395
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 2,795 2,795 0.45 0.05— 2,823
Annual—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
——————————— 172 172 0.03 < 0.005— 174
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
——————————— 226 226 0.04 < 0.005— 228
Regional
Shopping
Center
——————————— 64.7 64.7 0.01 < 0.005— 65.4
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 463 463 0.07 0.01— 467

EXHIBIT D
1597
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 52 / 99

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,039 1,039 0.17 0.02 — 1,049
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,365 1,365 0.22 0.03 — 1,379
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 391 391 0.06 0.01 — 395
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2,795 2,795 0.45 0.05 — 2,823 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,039 1,039 0.17 0.02 — 1,049
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,365 1,365 0.22 0.03 — 1,379

EXHIBIT D
1598
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 53 / 99
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 391 391 0.06 0.01 — 395
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2,795 2,795 0.45 0.05 — 2,823 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 172 172 0.03 < 0.005 — 174
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 226 226 0.04 < 0.005 — 228
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 64.7 64.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 65.4
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 463 463 0.07 0.01 — 467

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1599
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 54 / 99
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise

0.07 1.21 0.52 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,538 1,538 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,542 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.09 1.59 0.68 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,020 2,020 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,026 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 3,708 3,708 0.33 0.01 — 3,718 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise

0.07 1.21 0.52 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,538 1,538 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,542 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.09 1.59 0.68 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,020 2,020 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,026 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150

EXHIBIT D
1600
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 55 / 99
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 3,708 3,708 0.33 0.01 — 3,718 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise

0.01 0.22 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 255 255 0.02 < 0.005 — 255 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.02 0.29 0.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 334 334 0.03 < 0.005 — 335 Regional
Shopping
Center
< 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.8 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.03 0.53 0.24 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 614 614 0.05 < 0.005 — 616

EXHIBIT D
1601
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 56 / 99
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise

0.07 1.21 0.52 0.01 0.10— 0.10 0.10— 0.10— 1,538 1,538 0.14 < 0.005— 1,542 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.09 1.59 0.68 0.01 0.13— 0.13 0.13— 0.13— 2,020 2,020 0.18 < 0.005— 2,026 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 150 150 0.01 < 0.005— 150 Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Total 0.17 2.93 1.30 0.02 0.24— 0.24 0.24— 0.24— 3,708 3,708 0.33 0.01— 3,718 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise

0.07 1.21 0.52 0.01 0.10— 0.10 0.10— 0.10— 1,538 1,538 0.14 < 0.005— 1,542 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.09 1.59 0.68 0.01 0.13— 0.13 0.13— 0.13— 2,020 2,020 0.18 < 0.005— 2,026 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 0.13 0.11 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 150 150 0.01 < 0.005— 150

EXHIBIT D
1602
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 57 / 99
Enclosed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
with
Elevator
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.01 0.22 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 255 255 0.02 < 0.005 — 255 Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.03 0.53 0.24 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 614 614 0.05 < 0.005 — 616

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1603
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 58 / 99
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.73 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Consume
r
Products

40.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

5.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

6.79 0.69 75.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 206 206 0.01 < 0.005 — 207 Total 53.1 13.1 80.8 0.08 1.04 — 1.04 1.04 — 1.04 0.00 16,004 16,004 0.31 0.03 — 16,021 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.73 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Consume
r
Products

40.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

5.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 46.3 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 64.5 64.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 64.6 Consume
r
Products

7.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1604
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 59 / 99
Architectu 0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ral
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.61 0.06 6.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.8 16.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.9 Total 8.92 0.12 6.82 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 81.3 81.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.4

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.73 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Consume
r
Products

40.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

5.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

40.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1605
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 60 / 99
Architectu 5.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ral
Total 46.3 12.4 5.30 0.08 1.01 — 1.01 1.01 — 1.01 0.00 15,798 15,798 0.30 0.03 — 15,814 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 64.5 64.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 64.6 Consume
r
Products

7.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
ral
Coatings

0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.61 0.06 6.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.8 16.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.9 Total 8.92 0.12 6.82 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 81.3 81.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.4

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 37.1 70.0 107 3.81 0.09 — 230
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 48.7 92.0 141 5.01 0.12 — 302

EXHIBIT D
1606
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 61 / 99
Regional—————————— 11.6 22.0 33.6 1.20 0.03— 72.0
Shopping
Center
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 97.4 184 281 10.0 0.24— 604
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 37.1 70.0 107 3.81 0.09— 230
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 48.7 92.0 141 5.01 0.12— 302
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 11.6 22.0 33.6 1.20 0.03— 72.0
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 97.4 184 281 10.0 0.24— 604
Annual—————————————————

EXHIBIT D
1607
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 62 / 99
Condo/To
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 6.14 11.6 17.7 0.63 0.02 — 38.0
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 8.07 15.2 23.3 0.83 0.02 — 50.0
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 1.92 3.63 5.56 0.20 < 0.005 — 11.9
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 30.5 46.6 1.66 0.04 — 100.0

EXHIBIT D
1608
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 63 / 99
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 82.8 156 239 8.52 0.20— 513
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 31.5 59.5 91.1 3.24 0.08— 195
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 41.4 78.2 120 4.26 0.10— 257
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 9.88 18.7 28.5 1.02 0.02— 61.2
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 82.8 156 239 8.52 0.20— 513
Annual—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 5.22 9.86 15.1 0.54 0.01— 32.3

EXHIBIT D
1609
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 64 / 99
Apartmen
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 6.86 12.9 19.8 0.71 0.02 — 42.5
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 1.64 3.09 4.73 0.17 < 0.005 — 10.1
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 13.7 25.9 39.6 1.41 0.03 — 85.0

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 217 0.00 217 21.7 0.00 — 760
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 285 0.00 285 28.5 0.00 — 998
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 46.3 0.00 46.3 4.63 0.00 — 162

EXHIBIT D
1610
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 65 / 99
Enclosed—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
with
Elevator
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 549 0.00 549 54.9 0.00— 1,920
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 217 0.00 217 21.7 0.00— 760
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 285 0.00 285 28.5 0.00— 998
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 46.3 0.00 46.3 4.63 0.00— 162
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 549 0.00 549 54.9 0.00— 1,920
Annual—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 36.0 0.00 36.0 3.59 0.00— 126

EXHIBIT D
1611
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 66 / 99
Apartmen
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 47.2 0.00 47.2 4.72 0.00 — 165
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 7.67 0.00 7.67 0.77 0.00 — 26.8
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 90.9 0.00 90.9 9.08 0.00 — 318

EXHIBIT D
1612
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 67 / 99
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 82.3 0.00 82.3 8.23 0.00— 288
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 32.6 0.00 32.6 3.26 0.00— 114
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 42.8 0.00 42.8 4.28 0.00— 150
Regional
Shopping
Center
—————————— 6.95 0.00 6.95 0.69 0.00— 24.3
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Parking
Lot
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
—————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total—————————— 82.3 0.00 82.3 8.23 0.00— 288
Annual—————————————————
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
—————————— 5.39 0.00 5.39 0.54 0.00— 18.9
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
—————————— 7.09 0.00 7.09 0.71 0.00— 24.8

EXHIBIT D
1613
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 68 / 99
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — 1.15 0.00 1.15 0.12 0.00 — 4.03
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 13.6 0.00 13.6 1.36 0.00 — 47.7

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.20 6.20
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.74 6.74
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 0.39
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3

EXHIBIT D
1614
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 69 / 99
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.20 6.20
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.74 6.74
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 0.39
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.03 1.03
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.12 1.12
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21 2.21

EXHIBIT D
1615
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 70 / 99
Apartmen
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.74 6.74
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 0.39
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.20 6.20
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6.74 6.74
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 0.39
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13.3 13.3
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Condo/To
wnhouse
High Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.03 1.03
Apartmen
ts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.12 1.12
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.07 0.07
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.21 2.21

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1616
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 71 / 99
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1617
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 72 / 99

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

EXHIBIT D
1618
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 73 / 99
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1619
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 74 / 99
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1620
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 75 / 99
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1621
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 76 / 99
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

EXHIBIT D
1622
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 77 / 99
Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1623
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 78 / 99
Sequeste — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 1/1/2024 3/11/2024 5.00 50.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/12/2024 4/23/2024 5.00 30.0 — Grading Grading 4/24/2024 8/7/2024 5.00 75.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 8/8/2024 6/10/2027 5.00 740 — Paving Paving 6/11/2027 8/27/2027 5.00 55.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/28/2027 11/13/2027 5.00 55.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

EXHIBIT D
1624
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 79 / 99

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

EXHIBIT D
1625
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 80 / 99
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1626
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 81 / 99
Demolition Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck—— HHDT
Site Preparation————
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck—— HHDT
Grading————
Grading Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck—— HHDT
Building Construction————
Building Construction Worker 934 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 148 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck—— HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 187 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor— 8.40 HHDT,MHDT

EXHIBIT D
1627
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 82 / 99
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

EXHIBIT D
1628
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 83 / 99
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 187 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Site Preparation — — 45.0 0.00 —
Grading — — 225 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.5

EXHIBIT D
1629
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 84 / 99

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Condo/Townhouse High Rise — 0%
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Regional Shopping Center 0.00 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 100%
Parking Lot 0.00 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 10.5 100%

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1630
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 85 / 99
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 189,341 189,341 189,341 69,109,311

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Condo/Townhouse High Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 278
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 267
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 365
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 351
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0

EXHIBIT D
1631
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 86 / 99
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Condo/Townhouse High Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 278
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 267
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0
Apartments Mid Rise—
Wood Fireplaces0
Gas Fireplaces 365
Propane Fireplaces0
Electric Fireplaces0
No Fireplaces 351
Conventional Wood Stoves0
Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves0
Pellet Wood Stoves0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

EXHIBIT D
1632
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 87 / 99
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated Parking Area Coated (sq ft) (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
5714276.625 1,904,759 122,846 40,949 27,417

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Condo/Townhouse High Rise 1,859,241 204 0.0330 0.0040 4,798,219 Apartments Mid Rise 2,442,599 204 0.0330 0.0040 6,303,715 Regional Shopping Center 699,808 204 0.0330 0.0040 466,696 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1633
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 88 / 99
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Condo/Townhouse High Rise 1,859,241 204 0.0330 0.0040 4,798,219 Apartments Mid Rise 2,442,599 204 0.0330 0.0040 6,303,715 Regional Shopping Center 699,808 204 0.0330 0.0040 466,696 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Condo/Townhouse High Rise 19,353,413 0.00
Apartments Mid Rise 25,425,769 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 6,066,317 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Condo/Townhouse High Rise 16,450,401 0.00
Apartments Mid Rise 21,611,903 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 5,156,370 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1634
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 89 / 99
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Condo/Townhouse High Rise 403 —
Apartments Mid Rise 529 —
Regional Shopping Center 86.0 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Condo/Townhouse High Rise 60.5 —
Apartments Mid Rise 79.4 —
Regional Shopping Center 12.9 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

EXHIBIT D
1635
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 90 / 99
Condo/Townhouse High R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 Rise
Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
Condo/Townhouse High
Rise
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Regional Shopping
Center
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Condo/Townhouse High
Rise
Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Condo/Townhouse High
Rise
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Regional Shopping
Center
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00

EXHIBIT D
1636
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 91 / 99

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

EXHIBIT D
1637
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 92 / 99

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 16.2 annual days of extreme heat

EXHIBIT D
1638
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 93 / 99
Extreme Precipitation 2.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 18.8 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

EXHIBIT D
1639
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 94 / 99
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 1 1 2
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 37.8
AQ-PM 20.1
AQ-DPM 8.90
Drinking Water 54.0
Lead Risk Housing 4.86
Pesticides 52.7

EXHIBIT D
1640
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 95 / 99
Toxic Releases 31.9
Traffic 89.6
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 7.19
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 76.8
Impaired Water Bodies 23.9
Solid Waste 83.3
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 24.3
Cardio-vascular 34.2
Low Birth Weights 40.9
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 12.0
Housing 1.29
Linguistic 30.7
Poverty 8.68
Unemployment 30.9

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 88.28435776
Employed 88.70781471
Median HI 88.66931862
Education —

EXHIBIT D
1641
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 96 / 99
Bachelor's or higher 64.48094444
High school enrollment 13.5249583
Preschool enrollment 95.7141024
Transportation—
Auto Access 67.17567047
Active commuting 50.09624022
Social—
2-parent households 97.21544976
Voting 59.77158989
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 97.0101373
Park access 44.4629796
Retail density 7.442576671
Supermarket access 10.58642371
Tree canopy 22.91800334
Housing—
Homeownership 95.99640703
Housing habitability 93.16052868
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 71.74387271 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 74.51559091
Uncrowded housing 79.21211344
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 80.68779674
Arthritis 73.2
Asthma ER Admissions 67.9
High Blood Pressure 95.4
Cancer (excluding skin) 45.0

EXHIBIT D
1642
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 97 / 99
Asthma 61.7
Coronary Heart Disease 87.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 79.3
Diagnosed Diabetes 91.2
Life Expectancy at Birth 21.4
Cognitively Disabled 80.8
Physically Disabled 85.5
Heart Attack ER Admissions 58.5
Mental Health Not Good 68.6
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 69.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 82.3
Stroke 91.3
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 5.9
Current Smoker 64.6
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 85.0
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 88.9
English Speaking 71.6
Foreign-born 23.2
Outdoor Workers 44.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity—

EXHIBIT D
1643
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 98 / 99
Impervious Surface Cover 69.4
Traffic Density 76.5
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 15.1
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 60.4

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification

EXHIBIT D
1644
Harridge Development Project Operations Detailed Report, 12/2/2023 99 / 99
Land Use Based on applicant provided information
Operations: Architectural Coatings Based on BAAQMD Reg 8 Rule 3 Operations: Vehicle Data Based on Transportation Technical Memo. It is assumed peak hour trips would be 10 percent of total average daily trips

EXHIBIT D
1645
Appendix B-3
No Net Loss Parcels – Decrease in Commercial Use

EXHIBIT D
1646
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 1 / 85
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated

3.2. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1647
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 2 / 85

3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.4. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated

3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.6. Grading (2025) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.12. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.13. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.14. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated

3.15. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.16. Paving (2028) - Mitigated

3.17. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated

3.18. Architectural Coating (2028) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

EXHIBIT D
1648
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 3 / 85

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1649
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 4 / 85

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1650
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 5 / 85

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

EXHIBIT D
1651
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 6 / 85

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1652
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 7 / 85

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

EXHIBIT D
1653
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 8 / 85

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

EXHIBIT D
1654
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 9 / 85

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data

EXHIBIT D
1655
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 10 / 85

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Construction Start Date 1/1/2025
Operational Year 2040
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.00
Precipitation (days) 33.2
Location 37.70567461965193, -121.80009118943576
County Alameda
City Livermore
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 1677
EDFZ 1
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.24

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description

EXHIBIT D
1656
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 11 / 85
General Office
Building
1,531 1000sqft 35.2 1,531,486 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Water W-7 Adopt a Water Conservation Strategy
Waste S-1/S-2 Implement Waste Reduction Plan

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 291 291 31.7 35.5 0.07 1.37 19.8 21.2 1.26 10.1 11.4 — 13,327 13,327 0.44 1.15 34.8 13,716 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 291 291 31.7 33.4 0.07 1.37 19.8 21.2 1.26 10.1 11.4 — 13,025 13,025 0.47 1.16 0.90 13,385 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 44.9 44.7 17.5 22.5 0.05 0.64 5.19 5.83 0.59 2.00 2.59 — 9,186 9,186 0.32 0.82 10.0 9,449 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 8.20 8.16 3.20 4.11 0.01 0.12 0.95 1.06 0.11 0.36 0.47 — 1,521 1,521 0.05 0.14 1.66 1,564

EXHIBIT D
1657
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 12 / 85

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.00 3.37 31.7 35.5 0.07 1.37 19.8 21.2 1.26 10.1 11.4 — 13,327 13,327 0.44 1.15 34.8 13,716 2026 3.39 2.75 18.7 34.2 0.07 0.47 5.82 6.29 0.44 1.44 1.88 — 13,133 13,133 0.44 1.15 32.5 13,520 2027 3.27 2.64 17.8 32.8 0.07 0.43 5.82 6.25 0.40 1.44 1.84 — 12,925 12,925 0.43 1.15 29.9 13,309 2028 291 291 17.1 31.8 0.07 0.39 5.82 6.21 0.37 1.44 1.81 — 12,701 12,701 0.43 0.97 27.4 13,029 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.00 3.37 31.7 33.4 0.07 1.37 19.8 21.2 1.26 10.1 11.4 — 13,025 13,025 0.47 1.16 0.90 13,385 2026 3.33 2.68 19.5 32.1 0.07 0.47 5.82 6.29 0.44 1.44 1.88 — 12,837 12,837 0.46 1.16 0.85 13,196 2027 3.23 2.59 18.6 31.0 0.07 0.43 5.82 6.25 0.40 1.44 1.84 — 12,636 12,636 0.46 1.16 0.78 12,995 2028 291 291 17.7 30.0 0.07 0.39 5.82 6.21 0.37 1.44 1.81 — 12,417 12,417 0.45 1.12 0.71 12,761 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 2.51 2.11 17.5 20.6 0.04 0.64 5.19 5.83 0.59 2.00 2.59 — 6,025 6,025 0.22 0.35 4.39 6,139 2026 2.38 1.91 13.7 22.5 0.05 0.34 4.07 4.41 0.32 1.01 1.32 — 9,186 9,186 0.32 0.82 10.0 9,449 2027 2.30 1.84 13.1 21.8 0.05 0.31 4.07 4.38 0.29 1.01 1.29 — 9,042 9,042 0.32 0.82 9.26 9,304 2028 44.9 44.7 6.70 11.5 0.02 0.17 1.95 2.11 0.15 0.48 0.63 — 4,321 4,321 0.15 0.36 3.94 4,435 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.46 0.39 3.20 3.76 0.01 0.12 0.95 1.06 0.11 0.36 0.47 — 997 997 0.04 0.06 0.73 1,016 2026 0.43 0.35 2.50 4.11 0.01 0.06 0.74 0.80 0.06 0.18 0.24 — 1,521 1,521 0.05 0.14 1.66 1,564 2027 0.42 0.34 2.38 3.98 0.01 0.06 0.74 0.80 0.05 0.18 0.24 — 1,497 1,497 0.05 0.14 1.53 1,540 2028 8.20 8.16 1.22 2.10 < 0.005 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.09 0.12 — 715 715 0.02 0.06 0.65 734

EXHIBIT D
1658
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 13 / 85

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.00 3.37 31.7 35.5 0.07 1.37 19.8 21.2 1.26 10.1 11.4 — 13,327 13,327 0.44 1.15 34.8 13,716 2026 3.39 2.75 18.7 34.2 0.07 0.47 5.82 6.29 0.44 1.44 1.88 — 13,133 13,133 0.44 1.15 32.5 13,520 2027 3.27 2.64 17.8 32.8 0.07 0.43 5.82 6.25 0.40 1.44 1.84 — 12,925 12,925 0.43 1.15 29.9 13,309 2028 291 291 17.1 31.8 0.07 0.39 5.82 6.21 0.37 1.44 1.81 — 12,701 12,701 0.43 0.97 27.4 13,029 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.00 3.37 31.7 33.4 0.07 1.37 19.8 21.2 1.26 10.1 11.4 — 13,025 13,025 0.47 1.16 0.90 13,385 2026 3.33 2.68 19.5 32.1 0.07 0.47 5.82 6.29 0.44 1.44 1.88 — 12,837 12,837 0.46 1.16 0.85 13,196 2027 3.23 2.59 18.6 31.0 0.07 0.43 5.82 6.25 0.40 1.44 1.84 — 12,636 12,636 0.46 1.16 0.78 12,995 2028 291 291 17.7 30.0 0.07 0.39 5.82 6.21 0.37 1.44 1.81 — 12,417 12,417 0.45 1.12 0.71 12,761 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 2.51 2.11 17.5 20.6 0.04 0.64 5.19 5.83 0.59 2.00 2.59 — 6,025 6,025 0.22 0.35 4.39 6,139 2026 2.38 1.91 13.7 22.5 0.05 0.34 4.07 4.41 0.32 1.01 1.32 — 9,186 9,186 0.32 0.82 10.0 9,449 2027 2.30 1.84 13.1 21.8 0.05 0.31 4.07 4.38 0.29 1.01 1.29 — 9,042 9,042 0.32 0.82 9.26 9,304 2028 44.9 44.7 6.70 11.5 0.02 0.17 1.95 2.11 0.15 0.48 0.63 — 4,321 4,321 0.15 0.36 3.94 4,435 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.46 0.39 3.20 3.76 0.01 0.12 0.95 1.06 0.11 0.36 0.47 — 997 997 0.04 0.06 0.73 1,016 2026 0.43 0.35 2.50 4.11 0.01 0.06 0.74 0.80 0.06 0.18 0.24 — 1,521 1,521 0.05 0.14 1.66 1,564 2027 0.42 0.34 2.38 3.98 0.01 0.06 0.74 0.80 0.05 0.18 0.24 — 1,497 1,497 0.05 0.14 1.53 1,540 2028 8.20 8.16 1.22 2.10 < 0.005 0.03 0.36 0.39 0.03 0.09 0.12 — 715 715 0.02 0.06 0.65 734

EXHIBIT D
1659
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 14 / 85

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 87.9 82.9 42.4 467 1.29 1.39 135 137 1.32 34.3 35.6 1,289 156,361 157,650 138 6.33 67.9 163,047 Mit. 87.9 82.9 42.4 467 1.29 1.39 135 137 1.32 34.3 35.6 558 156,213 156,771 64.5 6.13 67.9 160,279 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 57% < 0.5% 1% 53% 3% — 2%
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 75.2 71.0 47.1 362 1.22 1.27 135 136 1.24 34.3 35.5 1,289 148,810 150,099 138 6.73 5.39 155,559 Mit. 75.2 71.0 47.1 362 1.22 1.27 135 136 1.24 34.3 35.5 558 148,663 149,221 64.7 6.53 5.39 152,792 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 57% < 0.5% 1% 53% 3% — 2%
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 70.8 67.1 36.6 302 0.94 1.20 99.5 101 1.16 25.2 26.4 1,289 120,224 121,513 137 5.36 24.6 126,560 Mit. 70.8 67.1 36.6 302 0.94 1.20 99.5 101 1.16 25.2 26.4 558 120,076 120,635 63.7 5.16 24.6 123,792 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 57% < 0.5% 1% 53% 4% — 2%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 12.9 12.2 6.67 55.2 0.17 0.22 18.2 18.4 0.21 4.61 4.82 213 19,904 20,118 22.7 0.89 4.07 20,953 Mit. 12.9 12.2 6.67 55.2 0.17 0.22 18.2 18.4 0.21 4.61 4.82 92.5 19,880 19,972 10.6 0.86 4.07 20,495 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 57% < 0.5% 1% 53% 4% — 2%

EXHIBIT D
1660
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 15 / 85

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 41.2 37.6 32.1 393 1.23 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 125,327 125,327 3.40 4.66 64.1 126,864 Area 45.7 44.8 0.56 66.6 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.09 — 0.09 — 274 274 0.01 < 0.005 — 275 Energy 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 29,775 29,775 3.96 0.38 — 29,986 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total 87.9 82.9 42.4 467 1.29 1.39 135 137 1.32 34.3 35.6 1,289 156,361 157,650 138 6.33 67.9 163,047 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 40.3 36.7 37.3 354 1.16 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 118,050 118,050 3.68 5.06 1.66 119,651 Area 33.8 33.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 29,775 29,775 3.96 0.38 — 29,986 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total 75.2 71.0 47.1 362 1.22 1.27 135 136 1.24 34.3 35.5 1,289 148,810 150,099 138 6.73 5.39 155,559 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 30.0 27.3 26.5 261 0.88 0.39 99.5 99.9 0.37 25.2 25.6 — 89,329 89,329 2.68 3.69 20.8 90,516 Area 39.7 39.2 0.28 32.8 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.04 — 0.04 — 135 135 0.01 < 0.005 — 136 Energy 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 29,775 29,775 3.96 0.38 — 29,986 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232

EXHIBIT D
1661
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 16 / 85
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total 70.8 67.1 36.6 302 0.94 1.20 99.5 101 1.16 25.2 26.4 1,289 120,224 121,513 137 5.36 24.6 126,560 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 5.48 4.99 4.84 47.7 0.16 0.07 18.2 18.2 0.07 4.61 4.67 — 14,789 14,789 0.44 0.61 3.45 14,986 Area 7.24 7.16 0.05 5.99 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.4 Energy 0.20 0.10 1.78 1.50 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 4,930 4,930 0.66 0.06 — 4,965 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 86.4 163 249 8.88 0.21 — 535 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 — 445 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62
Total 12.9 12.2 6.67 55.2 0.17 0.22 18.2 18.4 0.21 4.61 4.82 213 19,904 20,118 22.7 0.89 4.07 20,953

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 41.2 37.6 32.1 393 1.23 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 125,327 125,327 3.40 4.66 64.1 126,864 Area 45.7 44.8 0.56 66.6 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.09 — 0.09 — 274 274 0.01 < 0.005 — 275 Energy 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 29,775 29,775 3.96 0.38 — 29,986 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total 87.9 82.9 42.4 467 1.29 1.39 135 137 1.32 34.3 35.6 558 156,213 156,771 64.5 6.13 67.9 160,279 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 40.3 36.7 37.3 354 1.16 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 118,050 118,050 3.68 5.06 1.66 119,651

EXHIBIT D
1662
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 17 / 85
Area 33.8 33.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 29,775 29,775 3.96 0.38 — 29,986 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total 75.2 71.0 47.1 362 1.22 1.27 135 136 1.24 34.3 35.5 558 148,663 149,221 64.7 6.53 5.39 152,792 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 30.0 27.3 26.5 261 0.88 0.39 99.5 99.9 0.37 25.2 25.6 — 89,329 89,329 2.68 3.69 20.8 90,516 Area 39.7 39.2 0.28 32.8 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.04 — 0.04 — 135 135 0.01 < 0.005 — 136 Energy 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 29,775 29,775 3.96 0.38 — 29,986 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total 70.8 67.1 36.6 302 0.94 1.20 99.5 101 1.16 25.2 26.4 558 120,076 120,635 63.7 5.16 24.6 123,792 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 5.48 4.99 4.84 47.7 0.16 0.07 18.2 18.2 0.07 4.61 4.67 — 14,789 14,789 0.44 0.61 3.45 14,986 Area 7.24 7.16 0.05 5.99 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.4 Energy 0.20 0.10 1.78 1.50 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 4,930 4,930 0.66 0.06 — 4,965 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 139 212 7.55 0.18 — 455 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 19.1 0.00 19.1 1.91 0.00 — 66.7 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62
Total 12.9 12.2 6.67 55.2 0.17 0.22 18.2 18.4 0.21 4.61 4.82 92.5 19,880 19,972 10.6 0.86 4.07 20,495

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1663
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 18 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.86 2.40 22.2 19.9 0.03 0.92 — 0.92 0.84 — 0.84 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.39 0.33 3.04 2.73 < 0.005 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 469 469 0.02 < 0.005 — 471 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.55 0.50 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 77.7 77.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 77.9 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1664
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 19 / 85
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 120 120 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 122 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.6 16.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.75 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.79 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.86 2.40 22.2 19.9 0.03 0.92 — 0.92 0.84 — 0.84 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1665
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 20 / 85
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.39 0.33 3.04 2.73 < 0.005 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 469 469 0.02 < 0.005 — 471 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.55 0.50 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 77.7 77.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 77.9 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 120 120 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 122 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.6 16.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1666
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 21 / 85
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.75 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.79 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1667
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 22 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 2.60 2.48 < 0.005 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 435 435 0.02 < 0.005 — 437 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.62 1.62 — 0.83 0.83 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.47 0.45 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 72.1 72.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 72.3 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.29 0.29 — 0.15 0.15 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 152 152 < 0.005 0.01 0.60 154 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 141 141 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 142 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.6 11.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.8

EXHIBIT D
1668
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 23 / 85
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.93 1.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1669
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 24 / 85
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

EXHIBIT D
1670
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 25 / 85
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.6 11.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.93 1.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.80 3.20 29.7 28.3 0.06 1.23 — 1.23 1.14 — 1.14 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,622 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1671
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 26 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

0.78 0.66 6.10 5.82 0.01 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,356 1,356 0.06 0.01 — 1,361 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.89 1.89 — 0.75 0.75 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 1.11 1.06 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 224 224 0.01 < 0.005 — 225 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.35 0.35 — 0.14 0.14 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 173 173 < 0.005 0.01 0.69 176 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 33.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1672
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 27 / 85
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.50 5.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Grading (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1673
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 28 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

EXHIBIT D
1674
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 29 / 85
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.96 3.70 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 680 680 0.03 0.01 — 683 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.54 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 113 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1675
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 30 / 85
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.66 1.60 1.53 16.7 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 3,937 3,937 0.11 0.17 0.44 3,990 Vendor 0.48 0.20 8.64 3.69 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,691 6,691 0.27 0.97 0.47 6,988 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.45 0.39 4.58 0.00 0.00 1.13 1.13 0.00 0.26 0.26 — 1,125 1,125 0.03 0.05 2.07 1,142 Vendor 0.14 0.06 2.40 1.03 0.01 0.03 0.49 0.52 0.03 0.14 0.16 — 1,898 1,898 0.08 0.28 2.21 1,984 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 186 186 < 0.005 0.01 0.34 189 Vendor 0.03 0.01 0.44 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 314 314 0.01 0.05 0.37 329 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1676
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 31 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.96 3.70 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 680 680 0.03 0.01 — 683 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.54 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 113 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.70 1.67 1.07 18.8 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 4,244 4,244 0.08 0.16 16.8 4,310 Vendor 0.54 0.21 8.19 3.59 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,686 6,686 0.27 0.97 17.9 7,000 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.66 1.60 1.53 16.7 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 3,937 3,937 0.11 0.17 0.44 3,990 Vendor 0.48 0.20 8.64 3.69 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,691 6,691 0.27 0.97 0.47 6,988 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.45 0.39 4.58 0.00 0.00 1.13 1.13 0.00 0.26 0.26 — 1,125 1,125 0.03 0.05 2.07 1,142 Vendor 0.14 0.06 2.40 1.03 0.01 0.03 0.49 0.52 0.03 0.14 0.16 — 1,898 1,898 0.08 0.28 2.21 1,984

EXHIBIT D
1677
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 32 / 85
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 186 186 < 0.005 0.01 0.34 189 Vendor 0.03 0.01 0.44 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 314 314 0.01 0.05 0.37 329 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1678
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 33 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.62 1.47 1.05 17.7 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 4,163 4,163 0.08 0.16 15.3 4,228 Vendor 0.49 0.21 7.84 3.48 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,572 6,572 0.27 0.97 17.2 6,886 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.58 1.41 1.38 15.6 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 3,863 3,863 0.10 0.17 0.40 3,916 Vendor 0.47 0.20 8.29 3.54 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,578 6,578 0.27 0.97 0.45 6,875 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.12 1.00 0.87 10.8 0.00 0.00 2.83 2.83 0.00 0.66 0.66 — 2,778 2,778 0.06 0.11 4.73 2,818 Vendor 0.35 0.15 5.81 2.49 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,696 4,696 0.19 0.70 5.32 4,913 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.18 0.16 1.97 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 460 460 0.01 0.02 0.78 466 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.06 0.45 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 777 777 0.03 0.12 0.88 813 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

EXHIBIT D
1679
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 34 / 85
Onsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38— 0.38 0.35— 0.35— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27— 0.27 0.25— 0.25— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05— 0.05 0.05— 0.05— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1680
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 35 / 85
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.58 1.41 1.38 15.6 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 3,863 3,863 0.10 0.17 0.40 3,916 Vendor 0.47 0.20 8.29 3.54 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,578 6,578 0.27 0.97 0.45 6,875 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.12 1.00 0.87 10.8 0.00 0.00 2.83 2.83 0.00 0.66 0.66 — 2,778 2,778 0.06 0.11 4.73 2,818 Vendor 0.35 0.15 5.81 2.49 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,696 4,696 0.19 0.70 5.32 4,913 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.18 0.16 1.97 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 460 460 0.01 0.02 0.78 466 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.06 0.45 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 777 777 0.03 0.12 0.88 813 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1681
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 36 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34— 0.34 0.31— 0.31— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.88 0.74 6.71 9.24 0.02 0.24— 0.24 0.22— 0.22— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.22 1.69 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1682
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 37 / 85
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.17 0.14 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 451 451 0.01 0.02 0.71 458 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.02 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 762 762 0.03 0.12 0.83 798 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.88 0.74 6.71 9.24 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1683
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 38 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.22 1.69 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.56 1.40 0.91 16.6 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 4,086 4,086 0.06 0.16 13.8 4,149 Vendor 0.48 0.21 7.54 3.33 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,442 6,442 0.27 0.97 16.1 6,755 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.53 1.36 1.23 14.7 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 3,791 3,791 0.10 0.17 0.36 3,845 Vendor 0.47 0.20 8.00 3.43 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,447 6,447 0.27 0.97 0.42 6,745 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.08 0.95 0.77 10.2 0.00 0.00 2.83 2.83 0.00 0.66 0.66 — 2,726 2,726 0.06 0.11 4.27 2,766 Vendor 0.34 0.15 5.59 2.41 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,603 4,603 0.19 0.70 4.99 4,820 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.17 0.14 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 451 451 0.01 0.02 0.71 458 Vendor 0.06 0.03 1.02 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.24 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 762 762 0.03 0.12 0.83 798 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

EXHIBIT D
1684
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 39 / 85
Onsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30— 0.30 0.28— 0.28— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30— 0.30 0.28— 0.28— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.31 2.83 4.10 0.01 0.10— 0.10 0.09— 0.09— 760 760 0.03 0.01— 763 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.52 0.75 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 126 126 0.01 < 0.005— 126 Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1685
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 40 / 85
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.48 1.31 1.08 13.8 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95 — 3,724 3,724 0.09 0.17 0.32 3,777 Vendor 0.43 0.20 7.68 3.32 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58 — 6,295 6,295 0.26 0.93 0.39 6,578 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.41 0.34 4.23 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.26 0.00 0.29 0.29 — 1,189 1,189 0.02 0.05 1.70 1,206 Vendor 0.14 0.06 2.38 1.04 0.01 0.03 0.55 0.58 0.03 0.15 0.18 — 1,995 1,995 0.08 0.29 2.05 2,086 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 197 197 < 0.005 0.01 0.28 200 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.43 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 330 330 0.01 0.05 0.34 345 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.14. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1686
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 41 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30— 0.30 0.28— 0.28— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.31 2.83 4.10 0.01 0.10— 0.10 0.09— 0.09— 760 760 0.03 0.01— 763 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.52 0.75 < 0.005 0.02— 0.02 0.02— 0.02— 126 126 0.01 < 0.005— 126 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.53 1.37 0.90 15.6 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95— 4,014 4,014 0.06 0.03 12.4 4,038 Vendor 0.44 0.20 7.27 3.22 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58— 6,289 6,289 0.26 0.92 15.0 6,586 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.48 1.31 1.08 13.8 0.00 0.00 4.05 4.05 0.00 0.95 0.95— 3,724 3,724 0.09 0.17 0.32 3,777 Vendor 0.43 0.20 7.68 3.32 0.05 0.09 1.77 1.86 0.09 0.49 0.58— 6,295 6,295 0.26 0.93 0.39 6,578 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.46 0.41 0.34 4.23 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.26 0.00 0.29 0.29— 1,189 1,189 0.02 0.05 1.70 1,206 Vendor 0.14 0.06 2.38 1.04 0.01 0.03 0.55 0.58 0.03 0.15 0.18— 1,995 1,995 0.08 0.29 2.05 2,086

EXHIBIT D
1687
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 42 / 85
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 197 197 < 0.005 0.01 0.28 200 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.43 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 330 330 0.01 0.05 0.34 345 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.82 0.69 6.63 9.91 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.12 0.10 1.00 1.49 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 228 228 0.01 < 0.005 — 228 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.18 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.8

EXHIBIT D
1688
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 43 / 85
Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 123 123 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.38 124 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.3 17.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.86 2.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.16. Paving (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1689
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 44 / 85
Off-Road
Equipment

0.82 0.69 6.63 9.91 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.12 0.10 1.00 1.49 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 228 228 0.01 < 0.005 — 228 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.18 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.8 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1690
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 45 / 85
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.3 17.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.86 2.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.17. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
290 290 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
290 290 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1691
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 46 / 85
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.12 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 Architect
ural
Coatings

43.8 43.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.34 Architect
ural
Coatings

7.99 7.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.31 0.27 0.18 3.12 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.19 0.19 — 803 803 0.01 0.01 2.49 808 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.26 0.22 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.19 0.19 — 745 745 0.02 0.03 0.06 755 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 115

EXHIBIT D
1692
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 47 / 85
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 18.7 18.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 19.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.18. Architectural Coating (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
290 290 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
290 290 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EXHIBIT D
1693
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 48 / 85
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.12 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 Architect
ural
Coatings

43.8 43.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

7.99 7.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

EXHIBIT D
1694
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 49 / 85
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 18.7 18.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 19.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

41.2 37.6 32.1 393 1.23 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 125,327 125,327 3.40 4.66 64.1 126,864 Total 41.2 37.6 32.1 393 1.23 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 125,327 125,327 3.40 4.66 64.1 126,864 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

40.3 36.7 37.3 354 1.16 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 118,050 118,050 3.68 5.06 1.66 119,651 Total 40.3 36.7 37.3 354 1.16 0.52 135 136 0.49 34.3 34.8 — 118,050 118,050 3.68 5.06 1.66 119,651 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1695
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 50 / 85
General 5.48 4.99 4.84 47.7 0.16 0.07 18.2 18.2 0.07 4.61 4.67 — 14,789 14,789 0.44 0.61 3.45 14,986 Office
Building
Total 5.48 4.99 4.84 47.7 0.16 0.07 18.2 18.2 0.07 4.61 4.67 — 14,789 14,789 0.44 0.61 3.45 14,986

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

5.48 4.99 4.84 47.7 0.16 0.07 18.2 18.2 0.07 4.61 4.67 — 14,789 14,789 0.44 0.61 3.45 14,986 Total 5.48 4.99 4.84 47.7 0.16 0.07 18.2 18.2 0.07 4.61 4.67 — 14,789 14,789 0.44 0.61 3.45 14,986

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1696
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 51 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 3,000 3,000 0.49 0.06 — 3,029
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,000 3,000 0.49 0.06 — 3,029

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297

EXHIBIT D
1697
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 52 / 85
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 18,118 18,118 2.93 0.36 — 18,297 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 3,000 3,000 0.49 0.06 — 3,029
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,000 3,000 0.49 0.06 — 3,029

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 11,657 11,657 1.03 0.02 — 11,689 Total 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 11,657 11,657 1.03 0.02 — 11,689 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 11,657 11,657 1.03 0.02 — 11,689 Total 1.07 0.54 9.77 8.21 0.06 0.74 — 0.74 0.74 — 0.74 — 11,657 11,657 1.03 0.02 — 11,689 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1698
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 53 / 85
General
Office
Building

0.20 0.10 1.78 1.50 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,930 1,930 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,935 Total 0.20 0.10 1.78 1.50 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,930 1,930 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,935

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

0.20 0.10 1.78 1.50 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,930 1,930 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,935 Total 0.20 0.10 1.78 1.50 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,930 1,930 0.17 < 0.005 — 1,935

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1699
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 54 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products

32.8 32.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

1.03 1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

11.9 10.9 0.56 66.6 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.09 — 0.09 — 274 274 0.01 < 0.005 — 275 Total 45.7 44.8 0.56 66.6 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.09 — 0.09 — 274 274 0.01 < 0.005 — 275 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products

32.8 32.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

1.03 1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 33.8 33.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products

5.98 5.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.19 0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1700
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 55 / 85
Landsca 1.07 0.99 0.05 5.99 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.4 pe
Equipme
Total 7.24 7.16 0.05 5.99 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.4

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products

32.8 32.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

1.03 1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

32.8 32.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

1.03 1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 33.8 33.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1701
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 56 / 85
Consum 5.98 5.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.19 0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

1.07 0.99 0.05 5.99 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.4 Total 7.24 7.16 0.05 5.99 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 22.4

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 522 985 1,507 53.6 1.29 — 3,232 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

EXHIBIT D
1702
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 57 / 85
General — — — — — — — — — — — 86.4 163 249 8.88 0.21 — 535 Office
Building
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 86.4 163 249 8.88 0.21 — 535

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 443 837 1,281 45.6 1.10 — 2,747 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 139 212 7.55 0.18 — 455
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 73.4 139 212 7.55 0.18 — 455

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

EXHIBIT D
1703
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 58 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 768 0.00 768 76.7 0.00 — 2,686 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 — 445
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 — 445

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403

EXHIBIT D
1704
ISNP No Net Loss Rezoning - Opt 2 Decreased Commercial Detailed Report, 5/31/2024 59 / 85
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 115 0.00 115 11.5 0.00 — 403 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 19.1 0.00 19.1 1.91 0.00 — 66.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 19.1 0.00 19.1 1.91 0.00 — 66.7

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.72 3.72

Livermore City CouncilJuly 22, 2024

Livermore City Council
July 22, 2024