Livermore City Council
January 27, 2025

CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
MONDAY, JANUARY 27, 2025
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
CLOSED SESSION 6:30 PM

MEETING PARTICIPATION INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND AT THE END OF THE AGENDA

CIVIC CENTER MEETING HALL

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1016 S. LIVERMORE AVENUE
CITY OF LIVERMORE YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofLivermoreCalifornia
TV29:

Comcast TV Channel 29
tv29live.org
John P Marchand, Mayor
Evan Branning, Vice Mayor
Ben Barrientos, Council Member
Steven Dunbar, Council Member
Kristie Wang, Council Member
Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
1 1. CLOSED SESSION - 6:30 PM
Roll Call
Opportunity for the the Public to Address City Council Regarding Closed Session Items Adjourn to Closed Session
Note: This Closed Session my be continued to the end of the Regular Meeting.

1.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation. City Attorney Goal Setting for 2024-25 Review, pursuant to Government Code section 54957.

2. CALL TO ORDER

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3.1 Library Board of Trustees annual update presented by Chair Richard Hunt.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council accept the Library Board of Trustees annual update.

Staff Report

4. OPEN FORUM
In conformance with the Brown Act, no City Council action can occur on items presented during Open Forum.

To provide public comment in person, please submit a speaker card. When your name is called, walk to the lectern to address City Council.

Comments are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person, per item. The Mayor may reduce the amount of time based on the number of persons wishing to speak.

Comments are limited to one comment per person per item regardless of format or time submitted (this includes email and e-comment submissions prior to the meeting as well as live comments during the meeting).

Open Forum will conclude after 30 minutes; however, if there are additional speakers, Open Forum will reconvene before the meeting adjourns.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and are acted upon by the City Council with a single action. Members of the audience wishing to provide public input must submit a speaker

ROLL CALL
Council Member Ben Barrientos
Council Member Steven Dunbar
Council Member Kristie Wang
Vice Mayor Evan Branning
Mayor John Marchand

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
2 card found at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A speaker is limited to a single comment with a maximum of three minutes for the entire Consent Calendar. If Consent Calendar items are pulled for discussion by the City Council, a speaker will be allowed one comment per item on the items pulled for discussion and a separate comment for the remaining Consent Calendar. The one comment limit applies regardless of format or time submitted (this includes email and e-comment submissions prior to the meeting as well as live comments during the meeting).

5.1 Approval of draft minutes - December 9, 2024 Regular Meeting and January 13, 2025 Regular Meeting
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the draft minutes.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. DRAFT 2024-12-09

2. DRAFT 2025-01-13

5.2 Resolution awarding a construction contract with McGuire and Hester in an amount not-toexceed $2,434,000 for the construction of the Flagpole Plaza Project 2022-25.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution for the reconstruction of Flagpole Plaza Project 2022-25:

1. Awarding a construction contract to McGuire and Hester, in an amount not-to-exceed $2,434,000, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract attached as Exhibit A to the resolution,

2. Rejecting all other bids or proposals, and

3. Authorizing the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution including approving minor changes to the proposed agreement.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Agreement

5.3 Resolution declaring the intention to add Assessor’s Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 (SMP 40 project, located at the southern end of Discovery Drive and Atlantis Court) to the Future Annexation Area for the City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the intention to add Assessor Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 (SMP 40 project, located at the southern end of Discovery Drive and Atlantis Court) to Future Annexation Area for the City of Livermore Community Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
3 Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services) and authorizing and directing actions related thereto.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Proposed Boundaries of Territory Added to Future Annexation Area of CFD 2021-1

5.4 Resolution authorizing the execution of a third amendment to the Agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for landscape maintenance services to extend the term through January 31, 2030.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a third amendment to the Agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) for the City to provide landscape maintenance services on the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) frontage to extend the term through January 31, 2030.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Third Amendment

5.5 Resolution awarding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with HQ Construction Co.

Inc. to perform on-call special project general contracting in an amount not-to-exceed $1,600,000 for a five-year term ending January 31, 2030.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution awarding and authorizing execution of an agreement with HQ Construction Co. Inc. (HQ) for special project general contracting at various City facilities in an amount not-to-exceed $1,600,000 for a five-year term ending January 31, 2030.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Agreement

5.6 Resolution awarding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with Prime Mechanical Services Inc. to perform HVAC maintenance and repairs at all City-owned buildings in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for a five-year term ending February 28, 2030.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution awarding and authorizing execution of an agreement with Prime Mechanical Services Inc. for heating ventilation and air conditioner (HVAC) maintenance and repair services at City-owned buildings in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for a five-year term ending February 28, 2030.

Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
4 Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Agreement

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Comments are limited to one comment per person per item regardless of format or time submitted (this includes email and e-comment submissions prior to the meeting as well as live comments during the meeting).

6.1 Hearing to consider a request for Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan Design Review and Conditional Use Permit to develop vacant land located at the northwest corner of the Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive intersection, with a residential project known as Cornerstone.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt resolutions:

1. Finding that the project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (c), Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan, and California Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning;

2. Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 8669 – Subdivision (SUB) 22-006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; the requested Density Bonus Waivers and Incentive/Concessions; and the No Net Loss findings; and

3. Directing the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Planning Commission Staff Analysis Memorandum

2. Location Maps

3. Development Plans

4. Summary of No Net Loss

5. Draft Planning Commission Minutes 12-17-24

6. Planning Commission Consistency Determination Resolution

7. Resolution - Environmental

8. Exhibit A - Planning Commission Environmental Resolution

9. Exhibit B - Initial Study

10. Resolution - Project

11. Exhibit A - Planning Commission Project Resolution

12. Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval

7. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
Comments are limited to one comment per person per item regardless of format or time Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
5 submitted (this includes email and e-comment submissions prior to the meeting as well as live comments during the meeting).

7.1 Creation of a City Council ad-hoc subcommittee for the upcoming Planning Commissioner interviews.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council appoint an ad-hoc subcommittee to create interview questions, review applications, and determine the number of qualified Planning Commission applicants to be interviewed by the full City Council on March 3, 2025.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Livermore Municipal Code Chapter 2.55

8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY

MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

9. ADJOURNMENT
To a Regular City Council meeting on Monday, February 10, 2025 at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

10. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

10.1 Supplemental materials received prior to the meeting.

Staff Report
Attachments:
2025-01-27 Supplemental Materials

10.2 Supplemental materials received at the meeting.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Items Received at the Meeting

11. HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN YOUR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
You can participate in the meeting in a number of ways:

Open Forum is an opportunity for the public to speak regarding items not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person. To address the City Council in person, you must submit a speaker card to the City Clerk prior to the start of that item. Please note that the City Council is prohibited by State law from taking action on any items that are not listed on the agenda. However, if your item requires action, the City Council may place it on a future agenda or direct staff to work with you and/or report to the City Council on the issue.

Public Hearings - The topic of the hearing is typically summarized by staff, followed by a presentation by the applicant, and questions from the City Council. The Mayor will then open Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
6 the hearing to the public and offer an opportunity for public comments. Speakers are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person. To address the City Council in person, you must submit a speaker card to the City Clerk prior to the start of the presentation of the item.

Other Agenda Items are also open for public input including Consent Calendar or Matters for Consideration items. These comments are also subject to the 3-minute limit.

Special Meetings, Workshops - The public will have the opportunity to address the City Council regarding the item that is the subject of the special meeting or workshop. Public comments are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person.

Platforms to Participate in Meetings:

Submission of Comments Prior to the Meeting:

Email Comments may be submitted by the public to the City Clerk’s Office ([email protected]). Items received no later than 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council and available on the City website prior to the meeting. These items will NOT be read into the record.
eComments may be submitted by the public using the eComment link here. Comments may be up to 1000 characters in length and will be accepted up until 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. These items will NOT be read into the record and are viewable by the City Council and the public upon submittal.

Submission of Comments During the Meeting:

Speakers are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person. To submit a comment you must complete a speaker card for each item. Speaker cards are available in the Civic Center Meeting Hall lobby. Indicate on the card the item number you wish to comment on and submit the card directly to the City Clerk prior to the start of the item. Please note that the City Council is prohibited by State law from taking action on any items that are not listed on the agenda.

However, if your item requires action, the City Council may place it on a future agenda or direct staff to work with you and/or report to the City Council on the issue.

The City will be using YouTube and TV29 as two tools to provide the public access to view City Council meetings. No public comment will be accepted via YouTube.

TV29: tv29live.org Comcast Cable 29
YouTube: http://youtube.com/c/CityofLivermoreCalifornia If you would like to deliver written materials to the City Council as part of your public comment, please provide 10 copies to the City Clerk with your speaker card.

The City Council Agenda and Agenda Reports are prepared by City staff and are available for public review on Tuesday evening, six days prior to the City Council meeting in the Civic Center Library, 1188 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore, and at the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
7 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore. The Agenda is also available on the City’s website, http://LivermoreCA.gov/agenda.

Under Government Code §54957.5, any supplemental material distributed to the members of the City Council after the posting of this agenda will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore, and included in the agenda packet available on the City’s web site at http://LivermoreCA.gov/agenda.

PURSUANT TO TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (CODIFIED AT 42 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 12101 AND 28 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 35), AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, THE CITY OF

LIVERMORE DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, SEX, DISABILITY, AGE OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION IN THE PROVISION OF ANY SERVICES, PROGRAMS, OR ACTIVITIES. TO ARRANGE AN

ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PUBLIC MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE ADA COORDINATOR AT [email protected] OR CALL (925) 960-4170 (VOICE) OR (925) 960- 4104 (TDD) AT LEAST THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.

Livermore City Council Agenda January 27, 2025
8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 3.1
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Anwan Baker, Library Director
SUBJECT: Library Board of Trustees annual update presented by Chair Richard Hunt.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council accept the Library Board of Trustees annual update.

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS
Prepared by: Allen McFarland
Management Analyst II
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.1
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marianna Marysheva, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of draft minutes - December 9, 2024 Regular Meeting and January 13, 2025 Regular Meeting

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve the draft minutes.

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

1. DRAFT 2024-12-09

2. DRAFT 2025-01-13
Prepared by: Debbie Elam
City Clerk
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
10 MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 9, 2024
________________________________________________________________

REGULAR MEETING

1. CLOSED SESSION - NONE

2. CALL TO ORDER – The meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor John Marchand at 7:00 p.m., held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ROLL CALL – Present: Mayor John Marchand, Vice Mayor Robert W. Carling, and Council Members, Ben Barrientos, Evan Branning and, Brittni Kiick.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3.1 Confirm Advisory Body appointments to the Human Services Commission and the Livermore Housing Authority and direct the City Clerk to administer the oath of office.

Human Services Commission 2 Vacancies
Appointment to an unexpired term ending November 1, 2026 • Jagdish Girimaji

Appointment to an unexpired term ending November 1, 2028 • Justin Probert

Livermore Housing Authority 2 Vacancies (1 Tenant, 62 Years Old+) Reappointment to a regular term ending January 1, 2029
• Karen Hutchinson

Appointment to an unexpired term ending January 1, 2027 (Tenant, 62 Years Old+)
• Adam Talarman
Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF VICE MAYOR CARLING, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER KIICK AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL CONFIRMED THE APPOINTMENTS.

ATTACHMENT 1
11 City Clerk Debbie Elam administered the oath of office.

4. OPEN FORUM
Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

Arthur Barinque provided a comment.

Karl Wente provided a comment.

Trish Munro provided a comment.

There were no more speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER KIICK, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR CARLING AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

5.1 Approval of draft minutes for November 25, 2024.

5.2 Adoption of Omnibus Ordinance 2168 amending various sections of the Livermore Municipal Code and Livermore Development Code to make administrative, technical, and other non-substantive amendments.

5.3 Resolution 2024-204 authorizing the acceptance for permanent maintenance, release of the security bonds, and execution of a Notice of Completion for the City Hall HVAC & Central Plant Chiller Replacement Project 2018-30.

5.4 Resolution 2024-205 authorizing acceptance for permanent maintenance, release of the security bonds, and execution of a Notice of Completion for the 2023 Storm Damage Repair Project (LOP 5, 13, & 14), City Projects S202300A & S202300P, FEMA 4683.

5.5 Resolution 2024-206 determining Parcel 14 of Tract 8613, Shea Portola Apartments, located at the northeast corner of Portola Avenue and Collier Canyon Road, is annexed to the City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2023- 1 (Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Services).

5.6 Resolution 2024-207 approving the funding agreement between the TriValley Transportation Council and the City of Livermore for the allocation of TriValley Transportation Development Fund (TVTDF) funds in the amount of ATTACHMENT 1
12 $5,139,000 for environmental, permitting, right-of-way, and design activities associated with the I-580/Vasco Road Interchange Modification 1993-52.

5.7 Resolution 2024-208 making findings regarding the continuing need for unexpended balances of Development Impact Fees as of June 30, 2024, and accepting the Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

5.8 Resolution 2024-209 accepting the recommendation of the Altamont Landfill Open Space Committee to authorize the City's grant request.

Resolution 2024-210 finding the acquisitions of the Quint Property is categorically exempt from CEQA.

Resolution 2024-211 authorizing the City Manager to enter into Purchase and Sale Agreements for open space land.

Resolution 2024-212 appropriating funds for the acquisition of the Quint Property (41 acres - APNs: 99B-5300-2-13, 99B-5450-10-3).

5.9 Resolution 2024-213 authorizing the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department JPA (LPFD) to give notice of withdrawal to the California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority (CJPRMA).

5.10 Resolution 2024-214 authorizing the execution of a settlement agreement with the Livermore Premium Outlets LLC regarding public safety and traffic management.

5.11 Resolution 2024-215 accepting annual special tax and bond accountability reports for Fiscal Year 202324 Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park), 2009-1 (El Charro), 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance), 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance), 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance), 2016-2 (Shea Properties), 2018-1 (Auburn Grove), and 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

5.12 Resolution 2024-216 amending the City of Livermore Salary Plan to reflect adjustments to the Unclassified and Hourly salary schedule to implement increased minimum wage adjustments in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 and establish a new classification of Water Resources Technical Programs Manager - PE (Class Code 2231) and assign it to the Livermore Management Group salary schedule.

5.13 Resolution 2024-217 accepting the i-GATE Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

5.14 Update on Host Community Impact Fee Reserve Policy relating to the Bankhead Theater.

City Council received the update.

ATTACHMENT 1
13 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS – NONE

7. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION

7.1 Resolution accepting the Canvass of Votes for the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election.

Recommendation: Staff recommended the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the canvass of votes as certified by the Alameda County Registrar of Voters for the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election.

City Clerk Debbie Elam presented the staff report.

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER KIICK, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BARRIENTOS AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION:

Resolution 2024-218 accepting the canvass of votes as certified by the Alameda County Registrar of Voters for the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election.

The Mayor reordered the agenda moving Item 14. to before Item 8. Adjournment.

14. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY

MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PROVIDED A SUMMARY OF

RECENTLY ATTENDED EVENTS AND MEETINGS IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET. COUNCIL

MEMBERS WHO DID NOT PROVIDE A SUMMARY IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET ARE INCLUDED BELOW.

Compensation Discussion Council Member Kiick requested that city staff continue the discussion on compensation differentiation with the future council.

Interfaith Housing Vice Mayor Carling acknowledged that Open Heart Kitchen provided meals to the residents of Interfaith Housing when the residents did not have gas.

8. ADJOURNMENT - Adjournment sine die.

9. DELIVERY OF CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO:

JOHN MARCHAND - MAYOR
STEVEN DUNBAR - DISTRICT 3
KRISTIE WANG - DISTRICT 4
ATTACHMENT 1
14 City Clerk Debie Elam administered the oath of office to Mayor John Marchand, Council Member Steven Dunbar, and Council Member Kristie Wang.

The City Council took a recess at 7:55 p.m. and reconvened at 8:06 p.m.

10. CALL TO ORDER – The meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor John Marchand at 8:06 p.m.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor John Marchand and Council Members Ben Barrientos, Evan Branning, Steven Dunbar, and Kristie Wang.

11. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS – NONE

12. OPEN FORUM
Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

Brittni Kiick provided a comment.

Karl Wente provided a comment.

Alan Marling provided a comment.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

13. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION

13.1 Appointment of Vice Mayor for the period of 2024-2025.

Recommendation: Staff recommended the City Council appoint a Vice Mayor for the period of 2024-2025.

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF MAYOR MARCHAND, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BARRIENTOS, AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL

APPOINTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRANNING AS VICE MAYOR FOR THE PERIOD OF 2024-2025.

13.2 Council Members Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies.

Recommendation: Staff recommended the Mayor appoint Council Members to Intergovernmental Agencies, with the City Council's approval.

ATTACHMENT 1
15 Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF VICE MAYOR BRANNING, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WANG, AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE FOLLOWING APPOINTMENTS:

List of appointments – See attached document.

13.3 Appointment of Council Members to the City Council Subcommittee on Advisory Bodies for the period of January 1, 2025 - June 30, 2025.

Recommendation: Staff recommended the Mayor appoint two Council Members to serve on the City Council Subcommittee on Advisory Bodies for the period of January 1, 2025 - June 30, 2025, with the City Council's approval.

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER BARRIENTOS, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR, AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY

COUNCIL APPOINTED VICE MAYOR BRANNING AND MAYOR MARCHAND

TO SERVE ON THE CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE ON ADVISORY BODIES FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2025.

14. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY

MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PROVIDED A SUMMARY OF

RECENTLY ATTENDED EVENTS AND MEETINGS IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET. COUNCIL

MEMBERS WHO DID NOT PROVIDE A SUMMARY IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET ARE INCLUDED BELOW.

City of Livermore Council Member Branning expressed gratitude toward the outgoing Council Members and expressed support for working with the newly appointed Council Members.

Livermore Police Department Mayor Marchand expressed support for the Giving Tree and Shop with a Cop programs.

Bankhead Theatre/Downtown Livermore Mayor Marchand announced the upcoming Menorah lighting on December 28, 2024.

Livermore Wine Trolley Mayor Marchand noted the tickets for the family wine trolley are sold out.

ATTACHMENT 1
16 Wine Spectator Mayor Marchand announced that Livermore, CA made the list of Hallmark Wine Country Communities.

15.ADJOURNMENT – at 8:30 p.m. in memory of Phillip Dean to a Regular City Council Meeting on Monday, January 13, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

APPROVED:

JOHN P. MARCHAND, MAYOR
ATTEST: ___
DEBORAH L. ELAM, CITY CLERK
ATTACHMENT 1
17 City Council Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies/ City Bodies Appointed by the Mayor UPDATED: December 9, 2024
Intergovernmental
Agency Delegate Alternate
Date
Appointed
Meeting
Day/Month Meeting Time Agenda / Meeting Information
Alameda County Airport
Land Use Commission John Marchand No Alternate
12/9/2024
Bi-Monthly
(Jan, Mar,
May, July,
Sept, Nov)
3rd
Wednesday,
2:00 PM
Alameda County Community
Development - Meetings Calendar
Alameda County
Transportation
Commission (ACTC)
John Marchand Steven Dunbar 12/9/2024 4th Thursday of the month 2:00 PM https://www.alamedactc.org/all- meetings Altamont Landfill
Community Monitor
Committee
Ben Barrientos
Member No Alternate 12/9/2024
Quarterly, 2nd
Wednesday
(Jan, Apr, July,
Oct)
4:00 PM https://altamontcmc.org/
Altamont Landfill Open
Space Account Advisory
Committee
Kristie Wang No Alternate 12/9/2024
Bi-monthly (Jan,
March, May,
July, Sept, Nov)
– 3rd Friday of
the month, 12:30
pm to 2:30 p.m.
12:30 pm. to
2:30 pm
Alameda County Community
Development - Meetings Calendar
Altamont Regional Traffic
Authority John Marchand Kristie Wang 12/9/2024
At least one
regular
meeting each
year
The date, hour
and place at
which each
such regular
meeting shall
be fixed by
resolution.

Altamont Regional Traffic Authority

ATTACHMENT
1 18
City Council Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies/ City Bodies Appointed by the Mayor UPDATED: December 9, 2024
Intergovernmental
Agency Delegate Alternate
Date
Appointed
Meeting
Day/Month Meeting Time Agenda / Meeting Information
Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG)
General Assembly
Evan Branning Ben Barrientos 12/9/2024
3rd Tuesday of
every month.

General
Conference, as
announced, 1 day
program
(Additional
meetings, as
announced)
7:00 p.m. https://abag.ca.gov/meetings
*Ava (formerly known as
East Bay Community
Choice Energy JPA
(EBCE JPA)
Ben Barrientos Steven Dunbar 12/9/2024
3rd
Wednesday of
the month,
6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m.
https://avaenergy.org/aboutava/meetings-events/publicmeetings/ Intergovernmental
Committee (City /

LARPD / LVJUSD)
Evan Branning Kristie Wang 12/9/2024
Pending
changes
meeting is held
Bi-monthly on
the 3rd Thurs
of the month
8:30 AM or
3:30 PM
https://www.larpd.org/intergovernm
ental-liaison-committee
League of California
Cities East Bay Division
(LOCC)
Evan Branning Kristie Wang 12/9/2024
Regular
Meetings 4th
Thursday of
each month,
7:00 p.m.

Varies, as
announced
calcities.org/Events/Calendar-ofEvents
Livermore-Amador
Valley Transit Authority
(LAVTA) (Wheels)
Evan Branning &
Kristie Wang John Marchand 12/9/2024
1st Monday of
the month,
4:00 p.m.
4:00 p.m. https://www.wheelsbus.com/meetin gs-agenda/

ATTACHMENT
1 19
City Council Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies/ City Bodies Appointed by the Mayor UPDATED: December 9, 2024
Intergovernmental
Agency Delegate Alternate
Date
Appointed
Meeting
Day/Month Meeting Time Agenda / Meeting Information
*Livermore Amador
Valley Water
Management Agency
(LAVWMA) JPA
Evan Branning &
Steven Dunbar John Marchand 12/9/2024
Quarterly; 3rd
Wed of
February, May,
August,
November,
6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. https://lavwma.com/meetings/
Livermore Cultural Arts
Council (LCAC) John Marchand Kristie Wang 12/9/2024
Monthly, 1st
Wed of month,
except July.
7:00 p.m. https://lcac.org/about/
Livermore Downtown Inc
(LDI) Evan Branning Kristie Wang 12/9/2024 3rd Tuesday of the month https://www.livermoredowntown.co m/about/board-of-directors Livermore-Pleasanton
Fire Department JPA
(LPFD JPA)
John Marchand Steven Dunbar 12/9/2024 As needed Varies, as needed https://www.lpfire.org/about- us/jpa/jpa-board Livermore Valley
Chamber of Commerce
Liaison
John Marchand 12/9/2024
4th
Wednesday of
the month,
8:00 a.m.
8:00 AM https://www.livermorechamber.org/ about-us/board

ATTACHMENT
1 20
City Council Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies/ City Bodies Appointed by the Mayor UPDATED: December 9, 2024
Intergovernmental
Agency Delegate Alternate
Date
Appointed
Meeting
Day/Month Meeting Time Agenda / Meeting Information
Stockmen's Association
Liaison John Marchand 12/9/2024 As needed
Sister Cities Committee -
Yotsukaido, Japan John Marchand Evan Branning 12/9/2024 Sister Cities Committee -
Quezaltenango,
Gutemala
John Marchand Ben Barrientos 12/9/2024
Sister Cities Committee -
Snezhinsk, Russia John Marchand Kristie Wang 12/9/2024
StopWaste.Org
(ACWMA and The
Alameda County Source
Reduction and Recycling
Board)
Ben Barrientos Kristie Wang 12/9/2024
Regular
meetings, 4th
Wednesday of
month, 3:00 p.m.

Subcomm 2nd
Thurs of month,
time varies
3:00 PM
https://www.stopwaste.org/aboutstopwaste/boardinformation/upcoming-boardmeetings

ATTACHMENT
1 21
City Council Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies/ City Bodies Appointed by the Mayor UPDATED: December 9, 2024
Intergovernmental
Agency Delegate Alternate
Date
Appointed
Meeting
Day/Month Meeting Time Agenda / Meeting Information
Tri-Valley Cities Council 12/9/2024 Quarterly
Tri-Valley Community
Television Corporation
(TVCTV)
Paul Spence Marianna Marysheva 12/9/2024
Board Meeting
are normally
scheduled
quarterly, the
third Thursday
of the month
3:00 PM
View published agendas on City
Meeting Calendar page on City of
Livermore website
Tri-Valley Council -
Affordable Housing
Committee (TVAHC)
(This board no longer
meets)
Kristie Wang Ben Barrientos 12/9/2024 Quarterly
Rotation order between cities; Danville, San Ramon, Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore Posted on each City's website
Tri-Valley-San Joaquin
Valley Regional Rail
Authority (Valley Link)
John Marchand No Alternate 12/9/2024 Monthly
Rotates
between
member
agency
locations
valleylinkrail.com
Tri-Valley Transportation
Council (TVTC) Kristie Wang
Ben Barrientos
& rest of
Council
12/9/2024
Quarterly, 3rd
Monday of the
month
4:40 p.m.
https://www.tvtcjpa.com/Meetings/UpcomingMeetings.aspx Mayor and all Council Members

ATTACHMENT
1 22
City Council Appointments to Intergovernmental Agencies/ City Bodies Appointed by the Mayor UPDATED: December 9, 2024
Intergovernmental
Agency Delegate Alternate
Date
Appointed
Meeting
Day/Month Meeting Time Agenda / Meeting Information
Tri-Valley Water Liaison
Committee/Agencies
Round Table Liaison
Committee (Zone 7)
John Marchand Steven Dunbar 12/9/2024
Quarterly when
mutually
agreed upon
by the
participating
agencies.
https://www.zone7water.com/boardmeetings
Zone 7
Intergovernmental
Liaison Committee
John Marchand No alternate appointed 12/9/2024 As needed https://www.zone7water.com/board- meetings *NOTE: For scheduling
purposes - AVA and
LAVWMA both have
meetings on the 3rd
Wednesday of the month

ATTACHMENT
1 23
JANUARY 13, 2025 Minutes CM/75/1

CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 13, 2025
________________________________________________________________

CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER – The Closed Session of the City Council was called to order by Mayor John Marchand at 6:45 p.m., held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ROLL CALL – Present: Mayor John Marchand, Vice Mayor Evan Branning, Council Members Evan Branning and Kristie Wang.

Absent: Council Member Barrientos

OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ITEMS.

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

1. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION

1.1 Conference with Labor Negotiators. To meet with Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director, Kristen Hilton, Human Resources Manager, and Charles Sakai, a partner with the law firm Sloan, Sakai, Yeung and Wong LLP, the City’s negotiators pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6, regarding negotiations with the Livermore Police Officers Association.

Council Member Barrientos arrived at 6:53 p.m.
________________________________________________________________

REGULAR MEETING

2. CALL TO ORDER – The meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor John Marchand at 7:03 p.m., held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ROLL CALL – Present: Mayor John Marchand, Vice Mayor Evan Branning, Council Members Ben Barrientos, Evan Branning and, Kristie Wang.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ATTACHMENT 2
24 CM/75/2 Minutes JANUARY 13, 2025

REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Jason Alcala stated there was no reportable action.

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS – NONE

4. OPEN FORUM
Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

David McGuigan provided a comment.

Mayor Marchand called for recess at 7:09 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:21 p.m.

Mayor Marchand reordered the agenda moving Open Forum after item 6.1

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Item 5.4 Reanna Bradford of Livermore Valley Arts was invited to speak.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WANG AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

5.1 Resolution 2025-001 authorizing execution of a first amendment to the agreement with Pangea Environmental Services, Inc. for additional environmental support services for remediation activities associated with Livermore Village Remediation Project 2021-18, increasing the not-to-exceed contract amount from $1,165,000 to $1,716,500 and extending the term to December 31, 2028.

5.2 Resolution 2025-002 authorizing execution of the First Amendment to the Lease Agreement with the Livermore Flying Electrons Radio Control Club, Inc. (LFE) for the Raymond Road Model Aircraft Facility.

5.3 Resolution 2025-003 authorizing a second amendment to the agreement with PPWPM, Inc. to perform power washing services in the downtown corridor and other City-owned or maintained areas, increasing the not-to-exceed agreement amount from $300,000 to $575,000 and extending the term of the agreement through October 31, 2026.

5.4 Resolution 2025-004 accepting the Livermore Valley Arts Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

5.5 Resolution 2025-505 authorizing a supplemental appropriation in the ATTACHMENT 2
25 JANUARY 13, 2025 Minutes CM/75/3
amount of $450,000 in FY 2024-25 and awarding a construction contract with Westside Landscape & Concrete, Inc. in an amount not-to-exceed $335,204 for the construction of the Holmes Street Decorative Fence Replacement West Side from Catalina Drive to El Caminito Project PB200654.

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS

6.1 Hearing to consider a request to change the street name on a portion of East Vallecitos Road. The new name will be East Vineyard Avenue. New street numbers and the new street name will be issued to four parcels for the purpose of improving emergency response time and delivery service to those residents along the portion of the subject street.

Recommendation: The Planning Commission and staff recommended the City Council adopt a resolution approving the renaming of a portion of East Vallecitos Road to East Vineyard Avenue and instructing the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Recorder's Office.

Associate Planner Ackerman presented the staff report.

Mayor Marchand opened the public hearing.

There were no speakers, and the hearing was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR, SECONDED BY VICE MAYOR BRANNING AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 2025-006 finding that the matters initiated by staff (MIS) 24-001 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Resolution 2025-007 approving Matters Initiated by Staff (MIS) 24-001 for the request to change the street name on a portion of East Vallecitos Road to East Vineyard Avenue.

4. OPEN FORUM
Mayor Marchand re-opened the public comment period.

David McGuigan concluded a comment.

Suzy provided a comment.

Michael Blau provided a comment.

Arthur Barinque provided a comment.

There were no additional speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ATTACHMENT 2
26 CM/75/4 Minutes JANUARY 13, 2025

7. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION - NONE

8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY

MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PROVIDED A SUMMARY OF

RECENTLY ATTENDED EVENTS AND MEETINGS IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET. COUNCIL

MEMBERS WHO DID NOT PROVIDE A SUMMARY IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET ARE INCLUDED BELOW.

Serving Hands Council Members Barrientos, Dunbar, and Wang noted their attendance at the Children’s Business Fair held at Altamont Creek School on January 11, 2025.

Council Member Dunbar stated it was an honor representing the community.

Council Member Wang thanked staff for the extensive onboarding.

Council Member Barrientos and Vice Mayor Branning encouraged staff to find ways to help victims of the Southern California fires.

Vice Mayor Branning requested that staff contact Mr. Blau regarding garbage charges.

9. ADJOURNMENT – at 8:01 p.m. to a Regular City Council Meeting on Monday, January 27, 2025 at 7:00 p.m., Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

APPROVED:

JOHN P. MARCHAND, MAYOR
ATTEST: ___
DEBORAH L. ELAM, CITY CLERK
ATTACHMENT 2
27 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.2
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution awarding a construction contract with McGuire and Hester in an amount notto-exceed $2,434,000 for the construction of the Flagpole Plaza Project 2022-25.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution for the reconstruction of Flagpole Plaza Project 2022- 25:

1. Awarding a construction contract to McGuire and Hester, in an amount not-to-exceed $2,434,000, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract attached as Exhibit A to the resolution,

2. Rejecting all other bids or proposals, and

3. Authorizing the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution including approving minor changes to the proposed agreement.

SUMMARY
The Flagpole Plaza Project will replace the existing bluestone sidewalk and decomposed granite dining areas with new stamped concrete and hardscaped designated outdoor dining areas. The project will also restore a public gathering space. Attachment 1 shows the project location. The redesigned plaza will be fully ADA-compliant and accessible to all. Planned upgrades include enhanced lighting, featuring string lights to create a warm and inviting ambiance, as well as new landscaping. Additionally, advanced security cameras linked to the Police Department’s Real Time Awareness Center will be installed to bolster public safety. This project aims to enhance both the safety and aesthetics of a prominent city intersection, transforming it into a vibrant and functional space for the community.

Two bids were received for this project on December 10, 2024. Staff recommends the City Council award and authorize a construction contract with McGuire and Hester, the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, and authorize the City Manager to sign the construction contract.

DISCUSSION
The Flagpole Plaza was originally designed with a large grass area serving as a public gathering space. 28 However, following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the area was repurposed for outdoor dining. During this time, the grass was removed and replaced with decomposed granite to better accommodate dining needs. The City has since developed a design for the reconstruction of Flagpole Plaza with the following key goals in mind: restore the public gathering space, strengthen connections between the flagpole, the large existing fountain, and the plaza, and retain opportunities for outdoor dining in alignment with the Downtown Outdoor Dining Program. The design also aims to maintain east/west and north/south pedestrian connections through the site, while provide new landscaping, lighting and security cameras.

In August 2024, the City of Livermore began soliciting qualified contractors for pre-qualification based on the Department of Industrial Relations' model. Four contractors were pre-qualified for the project: Robert A. Bothman, Inc., McGuire and Hester, Golden Bay Construction, Inc., and Grade Tech, Inc. On December 10, 2024, the City received two bids for the project. The bids came in approximately 28% higher than anticipated most likely due to only having four pre-qualified bidders and only having two bidders actively participate in the bidding process. However, because this project is in the middle of the downtown and will impact neighboring businesses, staff recommends making sure that a pre-qualified contractor with substantial experience is selected. The lowest responsible and responsive bidder, McGuire and Hester, is a reputable construction company based in Oakland, California and has worked on various projects for the City of Livermore, Stanford University and Santa Clara Valley Water District.

Staff has checked references for McGuire and Hester and has found them satisfactory. In accordance with Livermore Municipal Code Section 2.68.590, Change Order authorization of 10%, $243,000, is allowed.

Contractor Location Bid Amount
McGuire & Hester Oakland $2,434,000
Robert A. Bothman Construction Santa Clara $2,554,000
Engineer's Estimate $1,900,000
Staff is currently working with the individual business owners in the Flagpole Plaza to discuss the project timeline, necessary sidewalk access closures, utility box replacements/adjustments, and assistance in arrangement of outdoor furniture for each outdoor dining area.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The Flagpole Plaza Project 2022-25 budget is currently $2.1 million: $1.7 million from Gas Taxes Fund 560 and $400,000 from Measure BB-Local Streets and Roads Fund 552. This budget covers design, project management, and construction activities in FY 2024-25. An additional $1.36 Million is required in FY 2025-26 to cover remaining construction, change orders, inspection, materials testing, engineering design services during construction, and project management. This additional funding will be requested as part of the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan that will come to Council for approval in June 2025.

This additional funding will come from Measure B - Bike/Pedestrian Fund 831 and Measure B - Local Streets and Roads Fund 832.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
4: Inclusive & Inviting Spaces & Places
29 GOAL
3: Continue to implement the Downtown Specific Plan

ATTACHMENTS

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Agreement
Prepared by: Joel Waxdeck
City Engineer
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
30 FLAGPOLE PAZA, LIVERMORE

LOCATION MAP PROJECT SITE
31 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH

MCGUIRE AND HESTER, IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$2,434,000, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLAGPOLE PLAZA
(Flagpole Plaza Project 2022-25)
The Flagpole Plaza Project will replace the existing bluestone sidewalk and decomposed granite dining areas with new stamped concrete and hardscaped designated outdoor dining areas. The project will also restore a public gathering space.

The redesigned plaza will be fully ADA-compliant and accessible to all. Planned upgrades include enhanced lighting, featuring string lights to create a warm and inviting ambiance, as well as new landscaping. Additionally, advanced security cameras linked to the Police Department’s Real Time Awareness Center will be installed to bolster public safety. This project aims to enhance both the safety and aesthetics of a prominent city intersection, transforming it into a vibrant and functional space for the community.

The City of Livermore pre-qualified four contractors in August 2024, for the Construction of the Flagpole Plaza Project 2022-25 (‘Project”). Two of these contractors submitted bids and they were opened on December 10, 2024.

City staff recommends awarding the project to McGuire and Hester, the lowest responsible and responsive bidder for the Project, and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement.

Funding for the Project in FY 2024-25 is included in the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan. Funding for the Project in FY 2025-26 will be requested as part of the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby:

1. Awards a construction contract to McGuire and Hester, in an amount not-toexceed $2,434,000, and authorizes the City Manager to sign the contract attached as Exhibit A to the resolution;

2. Rejects all other bids or proposals; and

3. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution including approving minor changes to the proposed agreement.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on January 27, 2025, by the following vote:
32 RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Deborah L. Elam Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Senior Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A- Construction Contract with McGuire and Hester 33 Livermore Contract Documents, page 28
Contract

CONTRACT
This public works contract (“Contract”) is entered into by and between the City of Livermore, a California Municipal Corporation (“City”) and McGuire and Hester, a California corporation (“Contractor”) for work on the Flagpole Plaza Project: 2022-25 (“Project”).

The Parties Agree as Follows:

1. Award of Contract.

In response to the Notice Inviting Bids, Contractor has submitted a Bid Proposal to perform work on the Project, and on January 27, 2025, as part of Resolution No. __________________, City authorized award of this Contract to Contractor for the amount of Contractor’s bid.

2. Contract Documents.

This Contract consists of all of the written representations and submissions made by Contractor as part of the Bid process and the following numbered and un-numbered component documents, as detailed on the table of contents of this Agreement:
a. Bidding requirements (consisting of the Notice Inviting Bids; Instructions to Bidders; Bid Proposal; Bid Schedule, Subcontractor List, Noncollusion Declaration, Bid Bond, Bidder’s Questionnaire, Payment Bond, Performance Bond, Warranty Bond);
b. General Conditions;
c. Special Conditions;
d. Division One Technical Specifications;
e. Appendix;
f. Index of Defined Terms;
g. Project Drawings and Specifications;
h. Bid Addenda, if any;
i. Change Orders, if any;
j. ALB Notice;
k. Notice to Proceed;
l. City Standard Specifications and Details;
EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 7
34 EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 7
35 EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 7
36 EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 7
37 EXHIBIT A Page 5 of 7
38 EXHIBIT A Page 6 of 7
39 EXHIBIT A Page 7 of 7
40 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.3
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution declaring the intention to add Assessor’s Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 (SMP 40 project, located at the southern end of Discovery Drive and Atlantis Court) to the Future Annexation Area for the City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the intention to add Assessor Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 (SMP 40 project, located at the southern end of Discovery Drive and Atlantis Court) to Future Annexation Area for the City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services) and authorizing and directing actions related thereto.

SUMMARY
The SMP 40 project, located at the southern end of Discovery Drive and Atlantis Court, was conditioned to annex into the City limits and to participate in a maintenance district to finance the maintenance, operation, and replacement of an on-site trail and other services associated with the project. The developer, Overton Moore, is seeking to fulfill this obligation by requesting inclusion into the Future Annexation Area of CFD 2021-1 following formal annexation to City limits. Formal annexation to the City was approved in August of 2024 and the parcel can now be added to the CFD 2021-1 boundary. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the intention to add Assessor Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 to Future Annexation Area for the City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

DISCUSSION
Development projects with new public trails, landscaping, or water quality and drainage infrastructure are required, through conditions of approval, to provide funding for the long-term maintenance and replacement of this infrastructure. This is typically done by forming a Community Facilities District (CFD).

Forming a CFD is a time consuming and costly process requiring City Council approval at two meetings separated by between 30 and 60 days. A more efficient and less costly process is to form a CFD with a future annexation area that includes the entire City. Development projects conditioned to provide 41 maintenance funding can then annex into the CFD through a simple process with the unanimous consent of the annexing property owners.

Under the Mello-Roos Act, the parcels in the future annexation areas are not subject to the special tax levied in the CFD until they annex into the CFD. Future zones may annex into the CFD if the owners execute a unanimous approval in which they agree to annex their parcel(s) into the CFD, without any further public hearings or proceedings. By establishing a future annexation area for a CFD, the annexation of future zones is streamlined by eliminating the need for multiple City Council meetings for each annexation proceeding.

On July 12, 2021, CFD 2021-01 (Maintenance and Public Services) was formed with a future annexation area that encompassed the entire boundary of the City at that time.

On March 25, 2024, the City Council approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 11219 for the SMP 40 parcel located just south of City limits at the end of Atlantis Court and Discovery Drive. The project was conditioned to annex into City limits and participate in a CFD to fund the maintenance of an on-site public trail.

The subject parcel was formally annexed into City limits in August of 2024. The parcel can now be incorporated into the CFD 2021-1 by adjusting the future annexation area of the CFD to include the newly annexed parcel.

PROCEDURE - INTENT TO ADD PARCEL TO FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA The City's Consultant, NBS, has prepared the adjusted boundary map for the CFD. The law firm of Jones Hall has prepared the legal documents associated with the CFD area addition. Staff has reviewed the proposed Boundary Map and legal documents, pursuant to which the City will levy special tax in the CFD to pay the services described above.

Staff recommends the City Council use the following process to adjust the CFD boundary:

January 27, 2025 - The City Council adopts the resolution declaring intention to add Assessor's Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 to Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services). The Resolution Declaring the Intention will set the date, time, and place of the public hearing, and direct the City Clerk to record the adjusted boundary map for the CFD and the adjusted Future Annexation Area.

Following adoption of the Resolution Declaring the Intention, a Public Hearing Notice will be published in a local newspaper a minimum of 7 days prior to the City Council public hearing on March 10, 2025.

March 10, 2025 - The City Council holds a public hearing and adopts a resolution adding territory to Future Annexation Area of the CFD.

Following the public hearing, the subject parcel that was added to the Future Annexation Area will now be able to annex into CFD 2021-1 without any requirement for further public hearings or additional proceedings if their owners execute a unanimous approval (Unanimous Approval). Under the Mello-Roos Act, this constitutes the vote of the qualified elector in favor of the matters addressed in the Unanimous Approval for purposes of California law.
42 FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The City will administer the CFD on an annual basis and will budget for, and manage, the necessary maintenance, operation, replacement, and administration. All related expenditures will be paid by the CFD.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
2: Economy That Prospers
GOAL
5: Facilitate the development of commercial and industrial projects that provide high-quality local jobs and support a diverse local economy.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Proposed Boundaries of Territory Added to Future Annexation Area of CFD 2021-1
Prepared by: Debbie Salgado
Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
43 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ADD ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 904-0010-002-10 TO THE FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA FOR THE CITY OF LIVERMORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-1 (MAINTENANCE

AND PUBLIC SERVICES), AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS

RELATED THERETO
The City of Livermore (the “City”) is a general law city organized under the Constitution and the laws of the State of California.

Under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the “Act”), this Council is authorized to establish a community facilities district and to act as its legislative body.

On May 25, 2021, this Council adopted its Resolution 2021-077, entitled “A Resolution Declaring the Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District, and Authorizing and Directing Actions Related Thereto” (the “Resolution of Intention”), and has conducted proceedings (the “Proceedings”) to establish “City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services)” (the “CFD”) and a future annexation area (the “Future Annexation Area”) pursuant to the Act to finance certain municipal services (the “Services) as provided in the Act.

Pursuant to notice as specified in the Act, and as part of the Proceedings, the Council held a public hearing under the Act on July 12, 2021, relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the CFD and the Future Annexation Area and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax (“Special Tax”) to be levied within the CFD to finance the Services, and at such hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD and the Future Annexation Area and the levy of the Special Tax were heard, substantial evidence was presented and considered by this Council and a full and fair hearing was held.

Upon the conclusion of the hearing on July 12, 2021, this Council adopted its Resolution No. 2021-129, entitled “A Resolution Forming a Community Facilities District and a Future Annexation Area, and Authorizing and Directing Actions Related Thereto” (the “Resolution of Formation), pursuant to which it completed the Proceedings for the establishment of the CFD and the Future Annexation Area, the authorization of the levy of the Special Tax within the CFD and the calling of an election within the CFD on the propositions of levying the Special Tax and establishing an appropriations limit within the CFD, respectively.

On July 12, 2021, a special election was held among the landowner voters within the CFD at which such voters approved such propositions by the two-thirds vote required by the Act, which approval has been confirmed by resolution of this Council. 44 RESOLUTION NO. ________
A parcel identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 904-0010-002-10 (the “Subject Property”) has annexed into the City and, pursuant to Section 53339.2 of the Act, this Council desires and hereby determines that it is in the public convenience and necessity to undertake proceedings to provide for future annexation of the Subject Property to the CFD by adding the Subject Property to the Future Annexation Area.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the recitals herein are true and correct.

Section 2. Authority. This Council hereby proposes to conduct proceedings to add the Subject Property to the Future Annexation Area.

Section 3. Boundaries Described. The boundaries of the Subject Property and the proposed revised boundaries of the Future Annexation Area are as shown on the map of them attached hereto as Exhibit A. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record, or cause to be recorded, such map in the office of the County Recorder within 15 days of the date of adoption of this Resolution.

Section 4. Services. The type of services proposed to be financed by the CFD and the Future Annexation Area, including the Subject Property, pursuant to the Act shall consist of those listed in Exhibit B to the Resolution of Formation and hereby incorporated herein (the “Services”). The City intends to provide the Services on an equal basis in the original territory of the CFD and, as parcels in the Future Annexation Area (including the Subject Property) are annexed to the CFD, to those annexed parcels.

Section 5. Special Tax. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax among the parcels of real property within the CFD were shown in Exhibit B attached to the Resolution of Formation and are hereby incorporated herein.

As required by Section 53339.3(d) of the Act, the Council hereby determines that the special tax proposed to pay for Services to be supplied within the Future Annexation Area, including the Subject Property, shall be equal to any special tax levied to pay for the same Services in the existing CFD, except that a higher or lower tax may be levied within the Future Annexation Area to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in the Future Annexation Area is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the existing CFD. In so finding, the Council does not intend to limit its ability to levy a special tax within the Future Annexation Area to provide new or additional services beyond those supplied within the existing CFD.

Section 6. Unanimous Approval. A special tax shall be levied on a parcel in the Future Annexation Area, including the Subject Property, only with the Unanimous Approval of the owner or owners of such parcel at the time that such parcel is annexed, without any requirement for further public hearings or additional proceedings. 45 RESOLUTION NO. ________
Section 7. Public Hearing. A public hearing on the addition of the Subject Property to the Future Annexation Area shall be held on Monday, March 10, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, California, after which this Council will consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the addition of the Subject Property to the Future Annexation Area. Written protests will be accepted until the conclusion of the public hearing.

Section 8. Notice of Hearing. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of the public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the CFD, the Future Annexation Area and the Subject Property. The publication shall be completed at least 7 days before the date of the public hearing specified above.

The notice of the public hearing shall be substantially in the form specified in Section 53339.4 of the Act, with the form summarizing the provisions hereof hereby specifically approved.

Section 9. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption by this Council.

On the motion of Council Member ____________, seconded by Council Member _______________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on January 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Deborah L. Elam
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ Molly A. O’Toole
Molly A. O’Toole
Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Proposed Boundaries of Territory Added to Future Annexation Area of CFD No. 2021-1
46 EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.4
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judy Erlandson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the execution of a third amendment to the Agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for landscape maintenance services to extend the term through January 31, 2030.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a third amendment to the Agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) for the City to provide landscape maintenance services on the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) frontage to extend the term through January 31, 2030.

SUMMARY
LLNS is contracted by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) to manage and operate LLNL. On July 14, 2014, the DOE/NNSA and City of Livermore entered into an agreement for the City to provide landscape maintenance along Vasco Road on the LLNL frontage for a term of five years with optional extensions of two additional three-year terms. The term of the original agreement after the two three-year extensions will expire on January 31, 2025. Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a third amendment so the City may continue to provide the same services to LLNS for five more years.

DISCUSSION
Since 1992, LLNL and the City have maintained an agreement for the City to provide landscape maintenance of the landscaping on the east side of Vasco Road adjacent to LLNL in the area shown in Exhibit A. Under the scope of the current agreement, staff maintains the landscaping on the LLNL frontage area on the east side of Vasco Road and maintains the public landscaping on the western side of Vasco Road to ensure consistency with the City’s landscaping standards. Moreover, it is convenient for LLNS to contract with the City to maintain the LLNL frontage landscaping. The work will be completed both by City staff and by the City's contractor.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
49 Staff anticipates the cost of providing this service will be approximately $52,000 per year which will continue to be fully reimbursed by LLNS.

COMMUNITY PILLARS
4: Inclusive and Inviting Spaces and Places
5: A City That Works
GOALS
7: Work with local and county partners on physical infrastructure improvements 14: Develop and maintain the City’s infrastructure, facilities, and property

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Third Amendment
Prepared by: Marisa Gan
Acting Public Works Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
50 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A THIRD AMENDMENT TO

THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LAWRENCE LIVERMORE

NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO EXTEND THE TERM THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2030
On July 14, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-095 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (“LLNS”) for landscape maintenance services to be performed by the City of Livermore or its contractors, on behalf of LLNS, on Vasco Road along the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory frontage. The term of the agreement was five years, which could be extended for two additional three-year periods upon mutual agreement of the parties. The City receives reimbursements for its services from LLNS.

On January 28, 2019, LLNS and the City entered into a first amendment to the landscape maintenance services contract to, among other things, extend the term of the agreement for the first of two, three-year extensions.

On January 21, 2022, LLNS and the City entered into a second amendment to the contract to utilize the second, three-year extension. The term of agreement now expires on January 31, 2025.

The City and LLNS desire to enter into a third amendment to the landscape services agreement to extend the term for an additional five-year period and to update the City’s billing rates for the services. Executing this amendment will permit the City to continue to provide landscape services along the Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory frontage, ensuring consistent landscaping in the area.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to execute a third amendment to the agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, attached hereto as Exhibit A, for landscape maintenance services to extend the term through January 31, 2030 and update the City’s billing rates.

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution, including approving minor changes to the proposed agreement.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on January 27, 2025, by the following vote:
51 RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Molly A. O’Toole
Deborah L. Elam Molly A. O’ Toole
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Third Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC
52

Amendment No. 3
THIS Amendment No. 3 to the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LLNS”), and the City of Livermore, a municipal corporation of the State of California (“CONTRACTOR”).

RECITALS
In or around July 2014, LLNS and CONTRACTOR entered into an agreement for CONTRACTOR to perform landscape maintenance services on Vasco Road along the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory frontage (“PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT”). Section 12 of the Original Agreement requires that any modifications to it must be in writing and signed by the parties.

On January 28, 2019, LLNS and CONTRACTOR entered into a First Amendment to the Original Agreement to extend the term for the first of two, three-year extensions and amend the address for notices (“Amendment No. 1”). On January 21, 2022, LLNS and CONTRACTOR entered into a Second Amendment to extend the term for the second of two, three-year extensions (“Amendment No. 2”). The term now expires on January 31, 2025. This Amendment No. 3 together with Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, and the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, shall be collectively referred to as the “Agreement.” LLNS and CONTRACTOR desire to extend the agreement for an additional five-year period, pursuant to the parties’ ability under Section 12 of the Agreement to amend the Agreement. The parties also desire to update billing rates for services by replacing Exhibit “B” with “Revised Exhibit B.” This is Amendment No. 3 to the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, LLNS and CONTRACTOR agree that the aforementioned recitals are true and correct and further agree as follows:

1. Section 6.1 is amended and restated to read as follows:
“6.1 The term of this Agreementshall expire on January 31, 2030.”

2. Section 5.4 shall be amended and restated to read as follows:
“5.4 Commencing January 1, 2025, and on each January 1st thereafter, CONTRACTOR shall review and adjust the billing rates set forth in “Revised Exhibit B”. In no event shall an adjustment result in a rate increase of more than the amount of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Docusign Envelope ID: E941A2BA-3E39-445D-9767-31EF74BC55B7

EXHIBIT A
53

for all urban consumers in the San Francisco - Oakland - San Jose, California area from the prior calendar year’s CPI rate. The adjustment rates shall be effective beginning July 1st of the year in which they are adjusted by the CONTRACTOR.”

3. All references in the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT to Exhibit “B” shall be replaced with “Revised Exhibit B”.

4. These amendments are prospective and only apply to the services rendered by CONTRACTOR after the execution of this Amendment. Unless otherwise stated herein, this Amendment does not relieve the parties of the terms and conditions of the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT as written and in effect at the time the services were rendered.

5. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged. Except as amended above, the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT remains in full force and effect.
************************************************************************************* Signatures and Attachment List on the Next Page
Docusign Envelope ID: E941A2BA-3E39-445D-9767-31EF74BC55B7

EXHIBIT A
54

LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
(City of Livermore Res. No. 2014-095)
For Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC:

By: Date:

Martin A. Martino, JD
Real Property Administrator
For the City of Livermore:

By: Date:

Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Deputy/Assistant/City Attorney
Attachments:

Exhibit B - Revised Exhibit B
Docusign Envelope ID: E941A2BA-3E39-445D-9767-31EF74BC55B7 1/8/2025 | 4:38 PM PST

APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE

EXHIBIT A
55 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

REVISED EXHIBIT B

ANNUAL COST AND FEE SCHEDULE
REVISED RA TES TAKE EFFECT ON JULY 1, 2024
CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed for landscape maintenance costs in accordance with the following estimates:

City Staff
$113.04 per hour (regular rate)
11 hours per month x 12 months per year= 132 hours per year 132 hours per year x $113.04 per hour= $14,921.28 per year Maintenance Materials and Supplies
$2,000.00 per year
Maintenance and Operations of Vehicles and Equipment
$2,000.00 per year
Subcontractor
$?,742.73 per month
12 months per year x $2,742.73 per month= $32,912.75 per year Total Annual Estimate
$14,921.28 City Staff
+ $2,000.00 Maintenance Materials and Supplies
+ $2,000.00 Maintenance and Operations of Vehicles and Equipment +$32,912.75
$51,834.03
Subcontractor
Total Annual Estimate

EXHIBIT B
Docusign Envelope ID: E941A2BA-3E39-445D-9767-31EF74BC55B7

EXHIBIT A
56 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.5
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judy Erlandson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution awarding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with HQ Construction Co. Inc. to perform on-call special project general contracting in an amount not-to-exceed $1,600,000 for a five-year term ending January 31, 2030.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution awarding and authorizing execution of an agreement with HQ Construction Co. Inc. (HQ) for special project general contracting at various City facilities in an amount not-to-exceed $1,600,000 for a five-year term ending January 31, 2030.

SUMMARY
The Public Works Department's Maintenance Division requires on-call special project general contracting services including moving services, facility setup for meetings and special events, and specific maintenance tasks. After a public procurement process, staff have completed review of the two proposals received and recommends the award of a contract to HQ Construction Co. as the best value.

DISCUSSION
The City of Livermore published a Request for Bids (RFB) (#24-362497) on September 23, 2024, to seek on-call special project general contracting services. Staff utilized a multi-step process in determining which bid represented the best value as defined by Livermore Municipal Code (LMC) 2.68.330. Two bids were received and responsive.

Bidder
Standard
Working Hours
Overtime
Working Hours
Material
Markup
A Services B Services A Services B Services
Anderson $190.00 $245.00 $270.00 $367.50 20%
HQ $92.00 $92.00 $138.00 $138.00 15%
Staff recommends that the City Council award an agreement to HQ as the best value and reject all other 57 bids. HQ provided the lowest bid and has provided reliable and quality services to the City for more than 13 years. Staff expects HQ's high level of service will continue with the execution of this agreement.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
Funding for these services is currently allocated in the City's annual operating budget for FY 2024-25 in Organization Code 740, Facilities Rehabilitation Program. Staff will include additional proposed appropriations in the FY 2025-27 budget and beyond.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
14: Develop and maintain the City’s infrastructure, facilities, and property

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Agreement
Prepared by: Marisa Gan
Acting Public Works Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
58 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AWARDING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT TO/WITH HQ CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. FOR ON-CALL SPECIAL

PROJECT GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,600,000 FOR A FIVE-YEAR TERM
The City of Livermore Public Works Department Maintenance Division requires on-call special project general contracting services, which include, without limitation, moving services, pressure washing, seismic stabilization of furniture, special event set up, and certain installation, repair, and maintenance services.

The City advertised and received two bids for on-call special project general contracting services, Request for Bid No. 24-362497. Pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 2.68.330, City staff reviewed the bids and determined that HQ Construction Co, Inc. is the best value bidder based on the cost, the quality of service provided to the City under previous contracts, and the ability, capacity and skill of the contractor to provide reliable and quality services to the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it:

1. Awards to HQ Construction Co, Inc. the agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, for on-call special project general contracting services, in an amount not-toexceed $1,600,000 for a five-year term.

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to execute an agreement with HQ Construction Co, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit A, for on-call special project general contracting services, in an amount not-to-exceed $1,600,000 for a five-year term.

3. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution, including approving minor changes to the proposed agreement.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on January 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
59 RESOLUTION NO. ________
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Molly A. O’Toole
Deborah L. Elam Molly A. O’ Toole
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Agreement with HQ Construction Co, Inc.
60 Agreement for Services Page 1
Rev. 09/19/23

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,
20___, by and between the City of Livermore (“City”), a municipal corporation, and HQ Construction Co, Inc. (“Contractor”), a California corporation.

RECITALS
City requires services to provide on-call special project general contracting services at various City facilities.

Contractor warrants it possesses the distinct skills, qualifications, experience, and resources necessary to timely perform the services described in this Agreement.

Contractor acknowledges City has relied upon these warranties to retain Contractor.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor hereby agree that the aforementioned recitals are true and correct and further agree as follows:

1. Retention as Contractor. City hereby retains Contractor, and Contractor hereby accepts such engagement, to perform the services described in Section 3 below subject to the terms and conditions in this Agreement.

2. Relationship of Parties – Independent Contractors. The relationship of the parties shall be that of independent contractors. Contractor and its employees are not City officers or employees. Contractor is responsible for the supervision and management of its employees, including any workers compensation insurance, withholding taxes, unemployment insurance, and any other employer obligations associated with the delivery of the services contemplated by this Agreement.

3. Description of Services. Contractor shall provide on-call special project general contracting services at various City facilities as more particularly set forth in Exhibit "A" (collectively “the Services”).

4. Contractor’s Responsibilities. Contractor shall:
(a) Diligently perform the Services in a manner commensurate with industry, professional, and community standards;
(b) Provide the resources necessary to complete the Services in a timely manner;
(c) Obtain a business license from the City of Livermore, and keep it in effect for the term of this Agreement;
(d) Obtain and keep in effect all necessary licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals legally and professionally required for Contractor to practice its profession and to provide the Services;
Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
61 Agreement for Services Page 2
Rev. 09/19/23
(e) Comply with all laws in effect that are related to Contractor and the Services; (f) Coordinate the Services with Jason Calkins - Public Works SupervisorFacilities (“Project Manager”), or such other person designated as the Project Manager by City;
(g) Be available to the Project Manager, and other parties referred to Contractor by the Project Manager, to answer questions or inquiries related to the Services; (h) Only invoice City for the Services rendered. Contractor’s invoice shall be in writing and describe the Services performed for the payment requested. Contractor shall not submit an invoice to City more frequently than once a calendar month; (i) Keep and maintain invoices and records related to the Services in an organized manner. At a minimum, the records must be kept for at least 3 years from the date of final payment to Contractor and must include time sheets, work progress reports, and other documentation to adequately explain all the Services invoiced for payment.

Contractor shall make the invoices and records immediately available to City upon delivery of a written request to examine, audit, or copy them at City’s place of business during normal business hours. Contractor shall give City 30 calendar-days’ written notice prior to destroying the invoices and records and allow City an opportunity to take possession. If City wants them, Contractor and City shall coordinate their delivery to City in the most efficient manner possible;
(j) Prepare and submit a written report to the Project Manager, within 3 business-days of the Project Manager’s written request, that identifies the Services completed and in progress, the charges incurred to date, and the anticipated cost to complete the remaining Services;
(k) Contractor shall correct, at its own expense, all errors in the Services.

Should Contractor fail to make such correction in a timely manner, City may make the correction and charge the cost thereof to Contractor;
(l) If applicable, Contractor shall ensure that all work for compensation is taken in compliance with the requirements of the California Labor Code including but not limited to hours of labor, nondiscrimination, payroll records, apprentices, worker’s compensation and prevailing wages. If applicable, Contractor shall comply with all prevailing wage laws, such as sections 1773, 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the California Labor Code and any other applicable wage and hour law. If any violation of prevailing wage law associated with this Agreement is deemed to have occurred by any court or administrative authority, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the applicable prevailing rates for any work done to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement; and,
(m) Contractor’s services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, and all amendments thereto, as well as applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA.

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
62 Agreement for Services Page 3
Rev. 09/19/23

5. Compensation and Payment.
(a) The total compensation payable by City to Contractor for the Services SHALL NOT EXCEED the sum of $1,600,000 ("not-to-exceed amount"). City shall compensate Contractor for the Services rendered at the hourly rates or task amounts set forth in Exhibit “A” up to the not-to-exceed amount. Except as provided in the body of this Agreement, the hourly rates or task amounts are intended to be Contractor’s only compensation for the Services and is inclusive of all costs of labor, licensing, permitting, travel expenses, overhead and administrative costs, and any-and-all other costs, expenses, and charges incurred by Contractor, its agents, and employees to provide the Services.
(b) City shall pay Contractor no later than 30 days after City receives a written invoice from Contractor and verifies the Services were performed for the payment requested.

6. Term. The term of this Agreement commences on February 1, 2025, and terminates upon the completion of the Services or January 31, 2030, whichever occurs first.

7. Termination by City. City may terminate any portion or all of the Services by giving Contractor at least 30 calendar-days written notice. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Contractor shall immediately stop all work in progress on the Services except where necessary to preserve the benefit of the work, and assemble the work on the Services for delivery to City on the termination date. All compensation for Services performed prior to the termination date shall be payable to Contractor in accordance with Section 5.

8. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, designs, data, photographs, reports and other items prepared or obtained by Contractor in the performance of the Services are City’s property and Contractor shall deliver them to City upon demand.

9. Copyright and Right of Use. All items created by Contractor for City under this Agreement are works made for hire, and Contractor shall give City the copyright and all intellectual property rights to all items developed, prepared, and delivered as part of the Services. Contractor agrees that all aspects of the Services and items created thereby will be original works of creation and will not use, in whole or in part, any work created by any other party, except when expressly disclosed by Contractor to City and Contractor obtains a license to such items for the benefit of City. All licenses must be perpetual, world-wide, non-exclusive, and royalty free sufficient in scope to permit City’s full use and enjoyment of its ownership rights in the items created by the Services.

10. Confidentiality. Contractor shall not disclose any confidential or proprietary information received from City to anyone except Contractor’s employees who require access to the information to perform the Services. This obligation shall survive termination and remain in full force and effect until the information, and any copies thereof, are destroyed or returned to City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
63 Agreement for Services Page 4
Rev. 09/19/23

11. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend with counsel selected by the City or otherwise acceptable to the City, the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, agents and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney’s fees and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, “Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor’s performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement, or in connection with Contractor’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of City. Contractor’s obligations to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend shall not be excused because of Contractor’s inability to evaluate Liability or because Contractor evaluates Liability and determines that Contractor is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. Contractor must respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City. (a) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a “construction contract” covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then Contractor’s duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
(b) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for “design professional services” defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, then Contractor’s duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a), unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

12. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain insurance during the term of this Agreement in the amounts and under the terms set forth in Exhibit “B” against claims that may arise from or in connection with this Agreement and performance of the Services.

Upon reasonable written notice, Contractor shall comply with any changes in the amounts and terms of insurance as may be required from time-to-time by City’s Risk Manager.

13. Acceptance of Final Payment. Contractor’s acceptance of final payment will release City from any and all claims and liabilities for compensation under this Agreement.

14. Acceptance of Work. City’s acceptance of, or payment to Contractor for, the Services does not release Contractor from its responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or competency of the Services, nor do the actions constitute an assumption of Contractor’s responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services.

15. Conflict of Interest. Contractor represents that no City employee or official has a financial interest in Contractor. Contractor shall not offer, encourage, or accept any financial interest in any part of Contractor's business by or from a City employee or official during the term of this Agreement or as a result of being awarded this Agreement. If any Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
64 Agreement for Services Page 5
Rev. 09/19/23
of the Services are paid by reimbursement from an agreement between City and a private party, Contractor represents that it has not performed any work for that private party during the 12-month period prior to the execution of this Agreement, and that it shall not negotiate, offer or accept any contract for services from that party during the term of this Agreement.

16. Economic Disclosure. Contractor shall comply with City’s local conflict of interest code and the Political Reform Act, and prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if the Services involve making, or participation in making, decisions which may have a material effect on the Contractors’ financial interest. While it is Contractor’s sole responsibility to evaluate its conflicts of interest, the Contractor nevertheless agrees to prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if requested by City.

17. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This is a non-exclusive agreement. City reserves the right to provide, and to retain other Contractors to provide, services that are the same or similar to the Services described in this Agreement.

18. No Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any of the Services without City’s prior written consent. For the purposes of this section, a change of fifty percent or more in the ownership or control of Contractor constitutes an assignment.

19. Remedies. All remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, are cumulative and alternative, and the invocation of a right or remedy will not be construed to waive or elect a remedy with respect to any other available right or remedy. As a condition precedent to commencing legal action involving a claim or dispute against City arising from this Agreement, the Contractor must present a written claim to City in accordance with Chapter 3.42 of the Livermore Municipal Code.

20. Construction of Language. The terms and conditions in this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation and each party had a full and fair opportunity to review and revise this Agreement with legal counsel. Any ambiguity in this Agreement will not be resolved against either party as the drafting party. In the event of an inconsistency or conflict between the language in the body of the Agreement and an attachment hereto, the language in the body of the Agreement controls.

21. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement supersedes all other agreements, whether oral or written, between the parties with respect to the Services.

Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. In the event the original of this Agreement is lost or destroyed, an archival copy maintained by City can be used in place of the original for all purposes with the same effect as if it was the original.

22. Notice. Notices under this Agreement must be delivered to the addresses below by deposit in the United States mail or by overnight delivery service, with postage prepaid and delivery confirmation:

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
65 Agreement for Services Page 6
Rev. 09/19/23
TO CITY: Attention: Jason Calkins
City of Livermore
3500 Robertson Park Road
Livermore, California 94550
TO CONTRACTOR: Attention: Richard Hoffmann
HQ Construction Co. Inc.
4435 First Street, #456
Livermore, CA 94551

23. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or conditions in this Agreement, no matter how long the failure continues, is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequently demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the non-breaching party.

24. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines a provision in this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired in any way.

25. Survival. The terms, conditions, and obligations in Sections 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

26. Electronic Signatures. By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed this disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time.

27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email, or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals and shall be valid and effective for all purposes.
**************************************************************************************************** Signatures and Attachment List on the Next Page
Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
66 Agreement for Services Page 7
Rev. 09/19/23
In concurrence and witness whereof, and in recognition of the mutual consideration provided therefore, the parties have executed this Agreement, effective on the date first written above.

CONTRACTOR: Dated:
____________________________ ___________________________ By: Richard Hoffmann
Title: Owner
CITY OF LIVERMORE: Dated:
____________________________ ____________________________ Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Deputy/Assistant/City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
_______________________
Risk Manager/Analyst
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Work
Exhibit B – Insurance Requirements
Exhibit C - DIR Compliance Certification
Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9 1/6/2025 | 8:37 AM PST

EXHIBIT A
67 Exhibit A
Scope of Work/Pricing Sheet
Types of Services
HQ Construction Co. Inc., (“Contractor”) shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, and supplies to perform the following services:

Group A Services:
• Relocation of furniture
• Relocation of boxes
• Relocation of miscellaneous items
• Hanging of pictures, dry erase boards, bulletin boards and similar items on walls • Pressure washing
• Seismic stabilization of furniture and related items
• Special event set up (chairs, tables, etc.)
• Vandalism clean up
• Other similar services as determined by the City
Group B Services:

Installation, repair and maintenance of:
• Carpentry
• Cabinetry
• Countertops
• Flooring, various materials
• Americans with Disabilities Act-required improvements (such as grab bars, rails, ramps, pipe wrap, etc.)
• Appliances (such as dishwashers, ovens, water heaters, etc.) • Electrical (conduit, wiring, fixtures, outlets, etc.) • Cabling (ethernet, coaxial, etc.)
• Concrete/Masonry (interior and exterior)
• Drywall (patching holes, filling small holes, etc.)
• Doors and Windows, including trim and frames
• Window Coverings (awnings, screens, etc.)
• Wall and Ceiling Mounts (for projectors, televisions, electronics, etc.) • Painting
• Plumbing (valves, fixtures such as faucets, toilets, urinals, etc.) • Stucco repair
• Other similar services as determined by the City
Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
68 Conditions of Work

1. This agreement does not obligate the City to any particular amount of work to be completed by Contractor.

2. All employees of Contractor shall wear uniforms clearly identifying them as employees of Contractor at all times while on City premises for the purpose of completing work.

3. All employees of Contractor assigned to perform services in the Police Department must submit to and pass a Livescan fingerprinting and background check.

4. Contractor shall provide City with a written record of all work performed on a per job basis detailing what work was performed, what materials were used, the presence of any deficient conditions, and any measures recommended to address the deficient conditions.

5. City reserves the right to halt work at any time for noncompliance with this agreement, or unsafe work conditions or practices.

6. Contractor shall keep worksites reasonably clear of debris and protect the safety of the public and City employees at all times. Contractor shall promptly remove all materials and spoils from each job site upon completion of the work.

7. All debris or spoils generated by the work of Contractor shall be properly disposed of by Contractor.

8. Contractor shall respond to work requests by the City within 24 hours.

9. Work may be required at any City-owned or operated facility within the City of Livermore.

10.Contractor shall warranty all work for a minimum of ninety days after the completion of the work. Any work required to remedy problems with installation or materials shall be at the sole cost of the Contractor within this ninety-day period.

11.Standard working hours are defined as Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. All other hours are considered overtime.

Compensation

1. Contractor shall be compensated for group A services during standard working hours at the rate of $92 per person per hour.

2. Contractor shall be compensated for group A services during overtime hours at the rate of $138 per person per hour.

3. Contractor shall be compensated for group B services during standard working hours at the rate of $92 per person per hour.

4. Contractor shall be compensated for group B services during overtime hours at the rate of $138 per person per hour.

5. City shall compensate Contractor for the documented cost of all reasonable materials used to perform the scope of work plus 15%.

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
69 6. City shall compensate Contractor for rental equipment only where City approves the use of rental equipment prior to its use. Rental equipment shall be compensated at the documented cost plus 15%.

7. Starting on February 1, 2027, the hourly rates specified above may be increased once every twelve months, provided that the monthly rates are not increased by more than the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) in the San Francisco-OaklandHayward, California area from the prior calendar year’s CPI-U rate in December.

8. City shall only compensate Contractor for labor during overtime hours when overtime is approved by City in advance.

9. City shall not compensate Contractor for travel time, parts procurement time, or debris disposal time.

10.Contractor shall be compensated for time on the premises while actively pursuing the execution of the work.

11.Upon request of the City, contractor shall submit legible, written receipts for all materials for reimbursement.

12.City will not compensate Contractor for work done in advance of City approval.

13.City shall not compensate Contractor for any purchase of equipment or tools, or inappropriate items for the scope of work.

14.At City’s request Contractor must provide receipts or invoices for all parts/materials used in the services to verify parts/materials pricing.

15.Contractor shall deliver all invoices via email to maintenance[email protected].

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
70 EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Consultant/Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:

1. Commercial General Liability, including operations, products and completed operations, as applicable:
$1,000,000/$2,000,000 aggregate per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form of insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability:
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer's Liability:

Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1,000,000 Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. A waiver of subrogation is required for Workers’ Compensation insurance. If Consultant/Contractor is a sole proprietor, then they must sign “Contractor Release of Liability”.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City of Livermore. The City of Livermore reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:

VII and accepted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Livermore.

Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, and designated volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant/Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant/Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

2. The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. The additional Revised 9/21/2015 B1 – 1M

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
71 insured coverage under the Consultant’s/Contractor’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 04 13. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City of Livermore before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

4. The Consultant’s/Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

5. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party before expiration of the policy unless notice is delivered in accordance with policy provisions.

6. It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of, the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured; whichever is greater.

7. Certificate Holder section of the insurance certificate should read: City of Livermore, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Verification of Coverage
Consultant/Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsement(s) effecting coverage to the City of Livermore for approval. The endorsements shall be on forms acceptable to the City of Livermore. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before work commences. The City of Livermore reserves the right to require complete and certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement.

Revised 9/21/2015 B1 – 1M

Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
72 Docusign Envelope ID: 5B759250-CA1A-4E23-83B1-7CF7F46BD5E9

EXHIBIT A
73 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.6
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judy Erlandson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution awarding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with Prime Mechanical Services Inc. to perform HVAC maintenance and repairs at all City-owned buildings in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for a five-year term ending February 28, 2030.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution awarding and authorizing execution of an agreement with Prime Mechanical Services Inc. for heating ventilation and air conditioner (HVAC) maintenance and repair services at City-owned buildings in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for a five-year term ending February 28, 2030.

SUMMARY
Contract HVAC services are used in conjunction with HVAC maintenance and repair services provided by staff. Staff have completed their review of the nine proposals received and is recommending Prime Mechanical Services Inc. as the best value bidder for these services.

DISCUSSION
The City of Livermore published a Request for Proposals (RFP) (#24-362497) on October 7, 2024, to qualified HVAC maintenance and repair contractors requesting routine monthly HVAC maintenance and repair services and on-call repairs at City-owned buildings. Utilizing contract services for routine maintenance activities, such as cleaning and calibrating temperature control devices, inspecting compressors, evaporators, and exhaust fans, other general HVAC maintenance services, and on-call repairs allows staff to complete more complex maintenance activities.

Staff utilized a multi-step process in determining which HVAC maintenance and repair contractor represented the best value as defined by Livermore Municipal Code (LMC) 2.68.330. The credentials and proposals of each of the bidders were evaluated and assessed by staff's contract evaluation team.

The City received nine proposals eight of which were responsive. Proposed pricing was submitted as shown in Table 1.
74 Table 1: Price Comparison
Bidder

TOTAL MONTHLY
COST

HOURLY RATE OT RATE HOLIDAY RATE
Air System Service
and Construction
$11,189.00
ESI $12,480.00 $195.00 $275.00 $345.00
Matrix HG Inc. $14,675.00 $202.00 $303.00 $405.00
Peterson
Mechanical
$24,725.00 $190.00 $230.00 $230.00
Prime Mechanical $7,825.00 $135.00 $202.50 $270.00
Silicon Valley
Mechanical
$7,872.00 $123.00 $184.50 $226.00
THP Mechanical $9,813.00 $195.00 $250.00 $375.00
United Mechanical $10,105.00 $191.06 $254.23 $317.39
Western Allied $17,110.83 $205.00 $307.50 $410.00
The monthly cost proposal from Prime Mechanical Services Inc. was the lowest bid and represents the best value to the City for HVAC maintenance and repair services based on total price, qualifications, experience, proposed schedule for providing services, services offered, and overall quality of proposal.

Prime Mechanical Services Inc. is the current contractor for HVAC maintenance and repairs and has a demonstrated record of providing quality service to Livermore for five years and staff expects Prime Mechanical Services Inc.'s high-level of service will continue to meet the needs of the City of Livermore.

The annual maximum compensation for Prime Mechanical Services Inc. will be $360,000. Staff estimates $93,900 will be expended annually for scheduled HVAC preventative maintenance and repair services. Staff have included additional funding as a contingency for on-call repair work beyond the cost of routine monthly services. Funding for approximately 1,000 hours of labor and materials is included in the budget for on-call and emergency maintenance and repairs due to the aging HVAC infrastructure at City facilities. Recent examples of on-call repairs include replacement of an HVAC unit at Fire Station 9, replacement of compressors at City Hall and the Water Resources Plant, and replacement of two HVAC motor drives at the Police Department.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
Funding for HVAC maintenance and repairs are allocated in the annual operating budget in Organization Code 740, Facilities Rehabilitation Program in the FY 2024-25 General Fund budget. Additional appropriations will be included in the FY 2025-26 budget and beyond.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
75 14: Develop and maintain the City’s infrastructure, facilities, and property

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Agreement
Prepared by: Marisa Gan
Acting Public Works Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
76 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AWARDING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO/WITH PRIME MECHANICAL SERVICE, INC. FOR HVAC

MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,800,000 FOR A FIVE-YEAR TERM
The City of Livermore operates various HVAC systems to provide temperature control in City facilities. The City requires an outside contractor to perform HVAC maintenance and repair services at City-owned buildings, including routine monthly preventative maintenance and on-call repairs. Utilizing contract services for routine maintenance activities, such as cleaning and calibrating temperature control devices and inspecting compressors, evaporators, and exhaust fans, and repairs allows staff to complete more complex maintenance activities.

The City advertised and received nine proposals for services to maintain and repair City HVAC systems, Request for Proposal No. 24-362497. Pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 2.68.330, City staff reviewed the proposals and determined that Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. is the best value bidder based on all relevant factors, including the cost, schedule for providing services, services offered, and ability, capacity, and skill of the contractor to provide the services requested.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it:

1. Awards to Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. the agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, for HVAC maintenance and repair services, in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for a five-year term.

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to execute an agreement with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit A, for HVAC maintenance and repair services, in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for a five-year term.

3. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution, including approving minor changes to the proposed agreement.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on January 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
77 RESOLUTION NO. ________
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Molly A. O’Toole
Deborah L. Elam Molly A. O’ Toole
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Agreement with Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. 78 Agreement for Services Page 1
Rev. 09/19/23

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this __________ day of ___________, 20__, by and between the City of Livermore (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. (“Contractor”), a California corporation.

RECITALS
City requires services to perform HVAC maintenance and repairs at all City-owned buildings.

Contractor warrants it possesses the distinct skills, qualifications, experience, and resources necessary to timely perform the services described in this Agreement.

Contractor acknowledges City has relied upon these warranties to retain Contractor.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor hereby agree that the aforementioned recitals are true and correct and further agree as follows:

1. Retention as Contractor. City hereby retains Contractor, and Contractor hereby accepts such engagement, to perform the services described in Section 3 below subject to the terms and conditions in this Agreement.

2. Relationship of Parties – Independent Contractors. The relationship of the parties shall be that of independent contractors. Contractor and its employees are not City officers or employees. Contractor is responsible for the supervision and management of its employees, including any workers compensation insurance, withholding taxes, unemployment insurance, and any other employer obligations associated with the delivery of the services contemplated by this Agreement.

3. Description of Services. Contractor shall provide services to perform HVAC maintenance and repairs at all City-owned buildings as more particularly set forth in Exhibit "A" (collectively “the Services”).

4. Contractor’s Responsibilities. Contractor shall:
(a) Diligently perform the Services in a manner commensurate with industry, professional, and community standards;
(b) Provide the resources necessary to complete the Services in a timely manner;
(c) Obtain a business license from the City of Livermore, and keep it in effect for the term of this Agreement;
(d) Obtain and keep in effect all necessary licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals legally and professionally required for Contractor to practice its profession and to provide the Services;
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
79 Agreement for Services Page 2
Rev. 09/19/23
(e) Comply with all laws in effect that are related to Contractor and the Services; (f) Coordinate the Services with Jason Calkins, Public Works SupervisorFacilities (“Project Manager”), or such other person designated as the Project Manager by City;
(g) Be available to the Project Manager, and other parties referred to Contractor by the Project Manager, to answer questions or inquiries related to the Services; (h) Only invoice City for the Services rendered. Contractor’s invoice shall be in writing and describe the Services performed for the payment requested. Contractor shall not submit an invoice to City more frequently than once a calendar month; (i) Keep and maintain invoices and records related to the Services in an organized manner. At a minimum, the records must be kept for at least 3 years from the date of final payment to Contractor and must include time sheets, work progress reports, and other documentation to adequately explain all the Services invoiced for payment.

Contractor shall make the invoices and records immediately available to City upon delivery of a written request to examine, audit, or copy them at City’s place of business during normal business hours. Contractor shall give City 30 calendar-days’ written notice prior to destroying the invoices and records and allow City an opportunity to take possession. If City wants them, Contractor and City shall coordinate their delivery to City in the most efficient manner possible;
(j) Prepare and submit a written report to the Project Manager, within 3 business-days of the Project Manager’s written request, that identifies the Services completed and in progress, the charges incurred to date, and the anticipated cost to complete the remaining Services;
(k) Contractor shall correct, at its own expense, all errors in the Services.

Should Contractor fail to make such correction in a timely manner, City may make the correction and charge the cost thereof to Contractor;
(l) If applicable, Contractor shall ensure that all work for compensation is taken in compliance with the requirements of the California Labor Code including but not limited to hours of labor, nondiscrimination, payroll records, apprentices, worker’s compensation and prevailing wages. If applicable, Contractor shall comply with all prevailing wage laws, such as sections 1773, 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the California Labor Code and any other applicable wage and hour law. If any violation of prevailing wage law associated with this Agreement is deemed to have occurred by any court or administrative authority, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the applicable prevailing rates for any work done to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement; and,
(m) Contractor’s services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, and all amendments thereto, as well as applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
80 Agreement for Services Page 3
Rev. 09/19/23

5. Compensation and Payment.
(a) The total compensation payable by City to Contractor for the Services SHALL NOT EXCEED the sum of $1,800,000 ("not-to-exceed amount"). City shall compensate Contractor for the Services rendered at the hourly rates or task amounts set forth in Exhibit “A” up to the not-to-exceed amount. Except as provided in the body of this Agreement, the hourly rates or task amounts are intended to be Contractor’s only compensation for the Services and is inclusive of all costs of labor, licensing, permitting, travel expenses, overhead and administrative costs, and any-and-all other costs, expenses, and charges incurred by Contractor, its agents, and employees to provide the Services.
(b) City shall pay Contractor no later than 30 days after City receives a written invoice from Contractor and verifies the Services were performed for the payment requested.

6. Term. The term of this Agreement commences on March 1, 2025, and terminates upon the completion of the Services or February 28, 2030, whichever occurs first.

7. Termination by City. City may terminate any portion or all of the Services by giving Contractor at least 30 calendar-days written notice. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Contractor shall immediately stop all work in progress on the Services except where necessary to preserve the benefit of the work, and assemble the work on the Services for delivery to City on the termination date. All compensation for Services performed prior to the termination date shall be payable to Contractor in accordance with Section 5.

8. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, designs, data, photographs, reports and other items prepared or obtained by Contractor in the performance of the Services are City’s property and Contractor shall deliver them to City upon demand.

9. Copyright and Right of Use. All items created by Contractor for City under this Agreement are works made for hire, and Contractor shall give City the copyright and all intellectual property rights to all items developed, prepared, and delivered as part of the Services. Contractor agrees that all aspects of the Services and items created thereby will be original works of creation and will not use, in whole or in part, any work created by any other party, except when expressly disclosed by Contractor to City and Contractor obtains a license to such items for the benefit of City. All licenses must be perpetual, world-wide, non-exclusive, and royalty free sufficient in scope to permit City’s full use and enjoyment of its ownership rights in the items created by the Services.

10. Confidentiality. Contractor shall not disclose any confidential or proprietary information received from City to anyone except Contractor’s employees who require access to the information to perform the Services. This obligation shall survive termination and remain in full force and effect until the information, and any copies thereof, are destroyed or returned to City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
81 Agreement for Services Page 4
Rev. 09/19/23

11. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend with counsel selected by the City or otherwise acceptable to the City, the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, agents and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney’s fees and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, “Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor’s performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement, or in connection with Contractor’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of City. Contractor’s obligations to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend shall not be excused because of Contractor’s inability to evaluate Liability or because Contractor evaluates Liability and determines that Contractor is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. Contractor must respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City. (a) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a “construction contract” covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then Contractor’s duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
(b) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for “design professional services” defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, then Contractor’s duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a), unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

12. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain insurance during the term of this Agreement in the amounts and under the terms set forth in Exhibit “B” against claims that may arise from or in connection with this Agreement and performance of the Services.

Upon reasonable written notice, Contractor shall comply with any changes in the amounts and terms of insurance as may be required from time-to-time by City’s Risk Manager.

13. Acceptance of Final Payment. Contractor’s acceptance of final payment will release City from any and all claims and liabilities for compensation under this Agreement.

14. Acceptance of Work. City’s acceptance of, or payment to Contractor for, the Services does not release Contractor from its responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or competency of the Services, nor do the actions constitute an assumption of Contractor’s responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services.

15. Conflict of Interest. Contractor represents that no City employee or official has a financial interest in Contractor. Contractor shall not offer, encourage, or accept any financial interest in any part of Contractor's business by or from a City employee or official during the term of this Agreement or as a result of being awarded this Agreement. If any of the Services are paid by reimbursement from an agreement between City and a private Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
82 Agreement for Services Page 5
Rev. 09/19/23
party, Contractor represents that it has not performed any work for that private party during the 12-month period prior to the execution of this Agreement, and that it shall not negotiate, offer or accept any contract for services from that party during the term of this Agreement.

16. Economic Disclosure. Contractor shall comply with City’s local conflict of interest code and the Political Reform Act, and prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if the Services involve making, or participation in making, decisions which may have a material effect on the Contractors’ financial interest. While it is Contractor’s sole responsibility to evaluate its conflicts of interest, the Contractor nevertheless agrees to prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if requested by City.

17. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This is a non-exclusive agreement. City reserves the right to provide, and to retain other Contractors to provide, services that are the same or similar to the Services described in this Agreement.

18. No Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any of the Services without City’s prior written consent. For the purposes of this section, a change of fifty percent or more in the ownership or control of Contractor constitutes an assignment.

19. Remedies. All remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, are cumulative and alternative, and the invocation of a right or remedy will not be construed to waive or elect a remedy with respect to any other available right or remedy. As a condition precedent to commencing legal action involving a claim or dispute against City arising from this Agreement, the Contractor must present a written claim to City in accordance with Chapter 3.42 of the Livermore Municipal Code.

20. Construction of Language. The terms and conditions in this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation and each party had a full and fair opportunity to review and revise this Agreement with legal counsel. Any ambiguity in this Agreement will not be resolved against either party as the drafting party. In the event of an inconsistency or conflict between the language in the body of the Agreement and an attachment hereto, the language in the body of the Agreement controls.

21. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement supersedes all other agreements, whether oral or written, between the parties with respect to the Services.

Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. In the event the original of this Agreement is lost or destroyed, an archival copy maintained by City can be used in place of the original for all purposes with the same effect as if it was the original.

22. Notice. Notices under this Agreement must be delivered to the addresses below by deposit in the United States mail or by overnight delivery service, with postage prepaid and delivery confirmation:

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
83 Agreement for Services Page 6
Rev. 09/19/23
TO CITY: Attention: Jason Calkins, Public Works Supervisor-Facilities City of Livermore
3500 Robertson Park Road
Livermore, California 94550
TO CONTRACTOR: Attention: John Eshelman
Prime Mechanical Service, Inc.
296 Wright Brothers Ave.

Livermore, CA 94551

23. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or conditions in this Agreement, no matter how long the failure continues, is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequently demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the non-breaching party.

24. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines a provision in this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired in any way.

25. Survival. The terms, conditions, and obligations in Sections 8, 9, 10, and 11 shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

26. Electronic Signatures. By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed this disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time.

27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email, or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals and shall be valid and effective for all purposes.
**************************************************************************************************** Signatures and Attachment List on the Next Page
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
84 Agreement for Services Page 7
Rev. 09/19/23
In concurrence and witness whereof, and in recognition of the mutual consideration provided therefore, the parties have executed this Agreement, effective on the date first written above.

CONTRACTOR: Dated:
____________________________ ___________________________ By: John Eshelman
Title: President
CITY OF LIVERMORE: Dated:
____________________________ ____________________________ Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Deputy/Assistant/City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
_______________________
Risk Manager/Analyst
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Work
Exhibit B – Insurance Requirements
Exhibit C - DIR Compliance Certification
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31 12/24/2024 | 2:07 AM PST

EXHIBIT A
85 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
City-Owned Buildings
Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. (“Contractor”) will provide preventive maintenance and repair services on all equipment and associated devices related to the HVAC systems at the following locations:

BUILDING ADDRESS
City Hall 1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Civic Center Meeting Hall 1016 S. Livermore Ave
Police Department 1110 S. Livermore Avenue
Maintenance Service Center 3500 Robertson Park Road
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue
Fire Station 6 4550 East Avenue
Fire Station 7 951 Rincon Avenue
Fire Station 8 5750 Scenic Avenue
Fire Station 9 1919 Cordoba Street
Fire Station 10 330 Airway Boulevard
Library – Civic Center 1188 S. Livermore Avenue
Library – Rincon 725 Rincon Avenue
Library – Springtown 998 Bluebell Drive
Livermore Municipal Airport and associated
tenant buildings.
680 Terminal Circle
Livermore Water Reclamation Plant 101 W Jack London Boulevard BUILDING AND MINIMUM MAINTENANCE HOURS REQUIRED PER MONTH:

City Hall 8
Police Department 8
Civic Library 8
Civic Center Meeting Hall 2
Rincon Library 2
Springtown Library 2
Fire Station 6 2
Fire Station 7 2
Fire Station 8 2
Fire Station 9 2
Fire Station 10 2
Maintenance Service Center 2
Multi-Service Center 2
Livermore Municipal Airport and Associated Tenant
Buildings.
4 Livermore Water Reclamation Plant 16
TOTAL NUMBER OF MINIMUM HOURS PER MONTH. 64
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
86 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Building Descriptions and List of Equipment

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT TAG UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle AC-1 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Roof Carrier Weather Maker
Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle AC-2 Packaged AC unit with electric strip heat Roof Carrier 50LJ 009 511ZA
Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle EF-1 Exhaust fan Roof N/A Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle CU-1 Condensing unit Roof Daikin RX518LVJU Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle HP-1 Air Handler West Ceiling Daikin RXYG120BPTJ Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle HP-1 Air Handler East Ceiling Daikin RXYG120BPTJ Airport Terminal 680 Terminal Circle EF-1 Renew Aire Roof HE2XRT Airport Terminal -
Altamont Aviation 180 Airway Blvd. A/C-1 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof York D4CGO36N04125A Airport Terminal -
Altamont Aviation 180 Airway Blvd. A/C-2 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof York D1GA030N04806A Airport Terminal -
Altamont Aviation 180 Airway Blvd. A/C-3 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof York D1GA024N03206A Airport – Tucknott
Electric 186 Airway Blvd. A/C-4 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof Carrier S80APOSO120B Airport – Tucknott
Electric 186 Airway Blvd. A/C-5 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof York D4CG060N08225 Airport - HK Cycle 196 Airway Blvd. A/C-6 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof ICP PGF060H190E Airport - West Coast
British Motors 190 Airway Blvd. A/C-7 Gas Pack A/C unit Roof BDP 559EJO2E Airport – Attitude
Aviation
299 W. Jack London
Blvd. A/C-1 Split system Ground and Ceiling Carrier 4OQP042301 Airport – Attitude
Aviation
299 W. Jack London
Blvd. A/C-2 Split system Ground and Ceiling Carrier 3BOWO23WM Airport – Attitude
Aviation
299 W. Jack London
Blvd. AH-1 Split system Ground and Ceiling Carrier FX4CWF042 Airport – Attitude
Aviation
299 W. Jack London
Blvd. AH-2 Split system Ground and Ceiling Carrier FX4CWF042 Airport – Valley
Machine 192 Airway Blvd. N/A N/A N/A N/A
City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AC-1 Split AC unit fan coil section4650 cfm at .5" FC at room floor Leibert FH/UH 114A City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AC-2 Split AC unit fan coil section700 cfm at .4" FC at ceiling Leibert MMO 18E City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AC-3 Split AC unit fan coil section1250 cfm at .3" FC at ceiling Leibert MMO 36E City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AC-4 Split AC unit fan coil section480 cfm at .3" FC at ceiling Leibert MMO12E City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AC-5 Split AC unit fan coil section1000 cfm at .3" FC at ceiling Leibert MMO 36E City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AC-6 Split AC unit fan coil section700 cfm at .34" FC at ceiling Leibert DMO 20E City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AHU-1 Air handler SF 13,000 cfm at4.9"; RF 13,000 cfm at 1.5" Rooftop fan; Room2 Temtrol SF DWDI AF-22; RFPF-33 City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AHU-2 Air handler SF 14,000 cfm at4.8"; RF 12,500 cfm at 1.5" Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-30; RF AF-27
City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AHU-3 Air handler SF 16,000 cfm at5.1"; RF 16,000 cfm at 1.5" Rooftop fan; Room1 Temtrol SF DWDI AF-22; RFPF-36 City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. AHU-4 Air handler SF 13,000 cfm at4.7"; RF 12,000 cfm at 1.5" Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-30; RF PF-22
City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. C-2 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 020A City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CHP-1&2 Chiller building loop pumps200 gpm at 50' Mech room B&G 1510-3BC Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
87 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT TAG UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CP-1 Hot water recirculating pump Storage room 175 Grundfos UP 26-64 HS 1502020 City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-1 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert DCD165LY City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-3 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 037A City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-4 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 014A City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-5 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 037A City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-6 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 020A City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-1 Exhaust fan 1700 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 160-5-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-2 Exhaust fan 1100 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 140-4-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-3 Exhaust fan 1180 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 140-5-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-4 Exhaust fan 600 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 130-4-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-5 Exhaust fan 150 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 98-4-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-6 Exhaust fan 220 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 95 City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-7 Exhaust fan 1120 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 140-4-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-8 Exhaust fan 1325 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck CUBE 140-4-X City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. GHW-1 Gas fired water heater 100gallon tank with recirc Storage room 174 AO Smith XHE BTH 150 City Hall 1052 S. Livermore
Ave. HWP-1&2 Heating water building looppumps 70 gpm at 50' Mech room B&G 1510-1.5AC Civic Center Meeting
Hall
1016 S. Livermore
Ave FCU (4) outdoor HVAC units Rooftop
(2) Mitsubishi outdoor units,
(1) Aaon, Inc Central HVAC
unit, (1) Fujitsu Split AC
Civic Center Meeting
Hall
1016 S. Livermore
Ave FCU (8) Fan coil units Various interior rooms
Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd CP-1 Recirculating pump 4 gpm at8' tdh
Exterior access
mech closet B&G 100 series
Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd CU-1 Condensing unit Outdoors Carrier 38HDC-036 Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd CU-2 Condensing unit Outdoors Carrier 38HDC-048 Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd EF-3 Exhaust fan Attic space through access panel Plymovent
Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd FAU-1 Split unit gas fired furnace Exterior access mech closet Carrier CT5436-M175
Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd FAU-2 Split unit gas fired furnace Exterior access mech closet Carrier CT5436-M175
Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd UH-1 Gas fired space heater Garage ceiling Sterling Fire Station No. 10 330 Airway Blvd UH-2 Gas fired space heater Garage ceiling Sterling Fire Station No. 6 4550 East Avenue AC-1 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Rooftop enclosure Trane YCC060F3MOBF
Fire Station No. 6 4550 East Avenue AC-2 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Rooftop 439OC20628
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
88 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT TAG UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
Fire Station No. 6 4550 East Avenue AC-3 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Rooftop enclosure 1500G10593
Fire Station No. 6 4550 East Avenue AC-4 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Rooftop enclosure 0700G10424
Fire Station No. 6 4550 East Avenue SH-1 Gas fired space heater Main garage area ceiling n/a
Fire Station No. 6 4550 East Avenue SH-2 Gas fired space heater Main garage area ceiling n/a
Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue CU-1 Condensing unit Outdoors Carrier 38TUA060-310 Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue CU-2 Condensing unit Outdoors Carrier 38TUA060-310 Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue EF-1 Exhaust fan n/a Cook Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue EF-3 Exhaust fan Rooftop enclosure American Fan Co. AF-12 Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue F-1 Gas fired furnace with DXcooling coil
North wall exterior
utility closet
Carrier Series 180 58
PAV111
Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue F-2 Gas fired furnace with DXcooling coil
North wall exterior
utility closet
Carrier Series 180 58
PAV111
Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue n/a AC unit Exercise room on wall Amana
Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue UH-1 Gas fired space heater Main garage area ceiling Modine High Efficiency II
Fire Station No. 7 951 Rincon Avenue UH-2 Gas fired space heater Main garage area ceiling Modine High Efficiency II
Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue AC-1 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Rooftop enclosure Trane YCD075C3LOBE
Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue EF-1 Exhaust fan 360 cfm at .25" n/a Greenheck Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue EF-2 Exhaust fan 200 cfm at .5" n/a Greenheck Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue EF-3 Exhaust fan 410 cfm at .25" n/a Greenheck Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue EF-4 Exhaust fan 200 cfm at .5" n/a Greenheck Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue FC-1 Split heat pump fan coil n/a Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue FC-2 Split heat pump fan coil n/a Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue FC-3 Split heat pump fan coil n/a Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue FC-4 Split heat pump fan coil n/a Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue HP-1 Split heat pump Rooftop enclosure Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue HP-2 Split heat pump Rooftop enclosure Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue HP-3 Split heat pump Rooftop enclosure Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue HP-4 Split heat pump Rooftop enclosure Mitsubishi PUH18EK Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue UH-1 to 4 Gas fired infrared unit heater Main garage area ceiling Schwank JR37-7055AN
Fire Station No. 8 5750 Scenic Avenue UH-5 Unit heater Ceiling n/a Fire Station No. 9 1919 Cordoba Street AC-1 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Rooftop Carrier 58OANH04
Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AC-1 Split AC unit fan coil section700 cfm at .4" FC at room ceiling Leibert MMO 18E Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AC-2 Split AC unit fan coil section700 cfm at .4" FC at room ceiling Leibert MMO 18E Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AC-3 Split AC unit fan coil section700 cfm at .4" FC at room ceiling Leibert MMO 18E Library –
Civic Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-1
Outdoor air handler SF 5300
cfm at 4.11", RF 5300 cfm
at1.4"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-20; RF FC-18
Library - Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-2
Outdoor air handler SF 6700
cfm at 4.12", RF 6700 cfm
at1.4"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-22; RF FC-18
Library - Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-3
Outdoor air handler SF 9000
cfm at 4.0", RF 8700 cfm
at1.32"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-27; RF FC-20
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
89 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT TAG UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
Library - Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-4
Outdoor air handler SF 10,000
cfm at 4.03", RF10,000 cfm at

1.29"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-27; RF FC-22
Library - Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-5
Outdoor air handler SF
8000cfm at 4.05", RF 8000
cfm at 1.43"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-24; RF FC-20
Library - Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-6
Outdoor air handler SF 10,300
cfm at 4.04", RF 8800cfm at

1.33"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-27; RF FC-20
Library - Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Avenue AHU-7
Outdoor air handler SF 6600
cfm at 4.12", RF 6000 cfm
at1.33"
Outdoor rooftop
enclosure Temtrol SF PF-22; RF FC-18
Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave.

CHWP1&2Chilled water building loop
pumps 200 gpm at 50' Mech room 149 B&G 1510-2.5BB
Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. CP-1 Hot water recirculating pump Mech room 149 Grundfos UP 26-64F Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-1 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 020A Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-2 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 020A Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. CU-3 Condensing unit CU on rooftop Leibert PFC 020A Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-1 n/a n/a n/a
Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-2 Exhaust fan 800 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck GB 120 Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-3 Exhaust fan 600 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck GB 90 Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-4 Exhaust fan 720 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck GB 120 Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-5 Exhaust fan 1080 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck GB 140 Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. EF-6 Exhaust fan 320 cfm at .5" Rooftop Greenheck GB 80 Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. GHW-1 Gas fired water heater 140gallon tank with recirc Mech room 149 AO Smith BTP 140-140 Library – Civic
Center
1188 S. Livermore
Ave. HWP-1&2 Heating water building looppumps 130 gpm at 50' Mech room 149 B&G 1510-2BC Library - Rincon 725 Rincon Avenue AC-1 Packaged AC unit with natural gas heat 2000 cfm Outdoor enclosure Trane YCD060A1NOAB
Library - Rincon 725 Rincon Avenue AC-2 Packaged AC unit with natural gas heat 1600 cfm Outdoor enclosure Trane YCD048A1NOAB
Library - Rincon 725 Rincon Avenue AC-3 Packaged AC unit with natural gas heat 1600 cfm Outdoor enclosure Trane YCD048A1NOAB
Library - Springtown 998 Bluebell Drive AC-1 Packaged AC unit with natural gas heat Rooftop ICP PGB048-FIHC
Library - Springtown 998 Bluebell Drive AC-2 Packaged AC unit with natural gas heat Rooftop ICP PGB048-FIHC
Maintenance
Service Center -
Bldg 1
3500 Robertson
Park Road AH-1 Air handler with cooling coil
and electric strip heat
In mech room; very
tight space Carrier 40RR-024537
Maintenance Service
Center -Bldg 1
3500 Robertson
Park Road EF-1 Bathroom exhaust fan Roof n/a
Maintenance Service
Center -Bldg 1
3500 Robertson
Park Road EF-2 n/a n/a n/a
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
90 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT TAG UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
Maintenance Service
Center -Bldg 1
3500 Robertson
Park Road EF-3 n/a n/a n/a
Maintenance
Service Center -
Bldg 1
3500 Robertson
Park Road HP-1 Air cooled condenser Outside of mech
room
n/a
Maintenance
Service Center -
Bldg 2
3500 Robertson
Park Road FC-3 Fan coil In office at ceiling Sanyo 09KH12 Maintenance Service
Center -Bldg 2
3500 Robertson
Park Road HP-3 Air cooled condenser n/a Sanyo 09KH12
Maintenance Service
Center -Bldg 3
3500 Robertson
Park Road FC-2 Fan coil - 3000 cfm at .25" Suspended from ceiling Carrier 40BA-009 Maintenance
Service Center -
Bldg 3
3500 Robertson
Park Road HP-2 Air cooled condenser Outside Carrier 38BQ 008 Maintenance
Service Center -
Bldg 5
3500 Robertson
Park Road HP-5 Packaged unit heat pump with
electric strip heater On open mezzanine Carrier 50NQ024300 Maintenance Service
Center -Bldg 6
3500 Robertson
Park Road HP-4 Packaged unit heat pump with
electric strip heater On open mezzanine Carrier 50NQ048311 Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-1 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Outdoor enclosure Carrier 48GXN024040301
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-2 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Outdoor enclosure Carrier 48HJD006---541--
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-3 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Outdoor enclosure Carrier 48HJD006---541--
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-4 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Outdoor enclosure Carrier 48GXN036090501--
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-5 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Outdoor enclosure Carrier 48HJE006---541--
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-6 Packaged AC unit with gas fired heat Outdoor enclosure
Carrier
WeathermasterCF4850HJ04
-070A1
Multi-Service Center 3311 Pacific Avenue AC-7 Split system Outdoor enclosure n/a Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue B-1 B-2B-3 Heater water boilers (3) Boiler room Riello Array 200 Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue CH-2 Backup chiller air cooledcentrifugal Outdoor mech. area Trane CGADC304AHA1GTJ Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue CH-1 Chiller Chiller room YORK YMC2-SO756AAS
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue CH-3 Chiller Chiller room McQuay DAAA WSC 063
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue CT-1 Cooling tower Outdoor mech. area BAC 33485-R Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue n/a Domestic hot water boilers (2) Boiler room Teledyne-Lars Mighty ThermVW Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue n/a Refrigeration unit Rooftop enclosure Correct Temp.

Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-1 Condenser water pump 660gpm at 55' Chiller room B&G Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-10 Chiller primary pump 560 gpmat 130 ' Chiller room B&G 1510-4G Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
91 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT
TAG

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-11 Condenser water pump
775 gpm at 55' Chiller room B&G 1510-5BC
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-2 Chiller primary pump 440 gpm at 130 ' Chiller room B&G 1510-3G Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-3 Chiller primary pump 46 gpm at 130 ' Chiller room B&G Series 90-1.5A Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue
P-4, P-5,
P-9
Heating water secondary
loop pumps 100 gpm at
130'
Boiler room B&G 1510-2G
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-6, P-7 Boiler primary circulatingpumps 50 gpm at 30' Boiler room Armstrong Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue P-8 Boiler primary circulatingpumps 50 gpm at 30' Boiler room B&G Series 80-2x2x7 Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue AH-1 Air handler
Third Floor – access
through second floor
storage closet
Trane Modular Climate
Changer
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue AH-2 Air Handler Fingerprint Room in
Lobby Haakon
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue AH-3 Air Handler -2000 CFM,

2.4 WA, 1623 RPM
Records room in
ceiling Haakon Airpak
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue AH-4 Air Handler – 4600 CFM,

3.2 in WC, 1727 RPM Roof top Haakon Pentpak
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue AH-5 Air Handler – 6500 CFM,
1166 RPM, 3.7 in WC Roof top Haakon Pentpak
Police 1110 S. Livermore
Avenue AH-6 Air Handler – 5000 CFM,

2.5 in WC, 1213 RPM Roof top Haakon Pentpak
LWRP - Administration
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 11AC001 CHILLER, ADMIN BLDG Machine Room Trane LWRP - Aeration Blower
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 31AC003 AIR CONDITIONING UNIT, DUCTLESS SPLIT Wall mounted in
MCC & Outdoor Fujitsu
LWRP - Digester Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 72AC001 AIR CONDITIONER, DIGESTER MCC Rooftop Carrier LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81AC002 COOLING TOWER, LAB Machine Room Unknown LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81AC003

AIR CONDITIONER, LAB

IT ROOM DUCTLESS
SPLIT
Rooftop and in T-Bar
Ceiling Fujitsu
LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81BO001 BOILER #1, LAB Machine Room Lochinvar LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81BO002 BOILER #2, LAB Machine Room Lochinvar LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81CF001 FEEDER, HVAC CHEMICAL Machine Room J.L. Wingert LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81CF002 FEEDER, HVAC CHEMICAL Machine Room J.L. Wingert LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82AC001 CHILLER Rooftop McQuay
LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82AH002 AIR HANDLING UNIT AH1, LAB ROOF Rooftop Energy Labs Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
92 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT
TAG

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82BO001 BOILER, #4, LAB ROOF INSIDE AIR HANDLER Rooftop inside Air
Handler Lochinvar
LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82CF001 FEEDER, HVAC CHEMICAL Machine Room J.L. Wingert LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82DE001 DEHUMIDIFIER, LAB Rooftop System Air LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82HE001

HEAT PUMPING
CONDENSING UNIT HP1,
ROOF
Rooftop Mitsubishi
LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82HE002

HEAT PUMPING
CONDENSING UNIT HP2,
ROOF
Rooftop Mitsubishi
LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82VF005 FAN, EXHAUST FUME HOOD #1 ROOF Rooftop Strobic Air LWRP - Lab Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82VF006 FAN, EXHAUST FUME HOOD #2 ROOF Rooftop Strobic Air

LWRP - LAVWMA
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 51AC003 AIR CONDITIONER, LAVWMA Indoor/Outdoor Carrier LWRP - Maintenance
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 12AC001

AIR HANDLER,

MAINTENANCE

BUILDING
Rooftop Trane
LWRP - RAS/WAS Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 41AC001 AIR CONDITIONER, RASWAS BUILDING Wall mounted in
MCC & Outdoor Fujitsu
LWRP - RO Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 81AC001 AIR CONDITIONER, RO MCC Ductless Split Unit Fujitsu LWRP - Solids Handling
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 71AC601 AIR CONDITIONER, SOLIDS MCC Indoor MCC Carrier LWRP - Solids Handling
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 71AH001 AIR HANDLING UNIT Indoor Overhead Trane LWRP - Solids Handling
Building
101 W Jack
London Boulevard 71CD601 CONDENSER, SOLIDS MCC ROOM A/C UNIT Outdoor Carrier LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 51AC002 AIR CONDITIONER, GYM Ductless Split Wall mounted and
Rooftop Quietside
LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 51AH002 AIR HANDLING UNIT, TERT HVAC RM Machine Room Trane LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 51BO001 BOILER, TERTIARY Machine Room Bryan LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 51IN047 HEATER, TANK, CIP Machine Room Bell & Gosset LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 52AC001

AIR CONDITIONER, PLC
6 FILTER CONTROL
ROOM
2nd Floor Outside Fujitsu
LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard

AIR CONDITIONER,

DUCTLESS SPLIT
SYSTEM
Wall mounted
Indoors & Outdoors
LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard

AIR CONDITIONER,

DUCTLESS SPLIT
SYSTEM
Wall mounted
Indoors & Outdoors
LWRP - Tertiary Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 51AC004

AIR CONDITIONER,

DUCTLESS SPLIT
SYSTEM
Wallmounted in MCC
& Outdoor Quietside
LWRP - UV Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 31AC002 AIR CONDITIONER, UV CONTROL ROOM Indoor/Outdoor Fujitsu LWRP - Water Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82AH003 PACKAGE AC/HEAT UNIT, WATER BUILDING Rooftop Bryant Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
93 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

LOCATION ADDRESS UNIT
TAG

UNIT DESCRIPTION

UNIT LOCATION &

ACCESSABILITY MAKE / MODEL
LWRP - Water Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82AH004 PACKAGE AC/HEAT UNIT, WATER BUILDING Rooftop Bryant LWRP - Water Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 82AH005 PACKAGE AC/HEAT UNIT, WATER BUILDING Rooftop Bryant LWRP - 480V Switchgear 101 W Jack
London Boulevard 61AC001 Air Conditioner Pad Mount Trane LWRP RO Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard
VRF System (8) Fan Coils
(1) VRF Condensing Unit
LWRP RO Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard
(5) Exhaust Fans
(2) VRF Branch Controllers
LWRP Aeration Building 101 W Jack
London Boulevard AC Air handler Rooftop Trane
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
94 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST &

SCHEDULE
The Contractor shall perform the necessary preventive maintenance as recommended by the manufacturer of the equipment and shall incorporate the following checks and functions into its work schedule:

A. TEMPERATURE CONTROL DEVICES
Thermostats and Temperature Controllers (Annually)

1. Calibrate as necessary.

2. Check general condition.

3. Replace device if defective. City will pay for parts as separate item.

Control Valves (Annually, except as noted)

1. Clean stems.

2. Check packing for leaks.

3. Lubricate packing as required; replace if required.

4. Check for proper seating; replace if required.

5. Check for proper shut-off.

6. Check operator diaphragm (pneumatic).

Relays

1. Inspect relay to insure proper operation every six (6) months.

Dampers

1. Check for proper operation and adjust/repair as needed every six (6) months.

2. Lubricate dampers as needed.

B. REFRIGERATION COMPRESSOR

1. Check oil level monthly.

2. Check for oil leaks monthly.

3. Check refrigerant charge condition through sight glass each visit.

4. Check for unusual noise and vibration each visit.

5. Check refrigeration compressor and refrigeration piping for leaks quarterly.

6. Check operation of safety and capacity controls for proper operation, including high and low pressure cut-outs every six (6) months.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
95 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
C. EXPANSION VALVE (Quarterly)

1. Check all valves for evidence of sticking.

2. Check expansion valve bulb to see that it has good contact with suction line.

3. Check operation of all solenoid valves.

D. EVAPORATOR

1. Inspect fins annually; clean/straighten fins as needed

2. Check for rust and scale quarterly.

3. Check and paint shrouds/encasements as needed.

E. AIR HANDLERS AND EXHAUST FANS (Quarterly, except as noted)

1. Check blower mounting and tighten if necessary.

2. Check shaft alignment to motor.

3. Check blower pulley for security to shaft.

4. Check blower belt for condition and tension. Adjust or replace as needed.

5. Oil or grease shaft bearings.

6. Check blower fan for dirt and clean as needed.

7. Check housing for rust and repair as necessary.

8. Clean coil faces as needed.

9. Inspect condensate pan monthly; purge drain line as needed.

F. ELECTRIC MOTORS (Quarterly, except as noted)

1. Check motor mounting and tighten if necessary.

2. Check motor pulley for security, alignment and tighten if necessary.

3. Check bearing wear.

4. Check wiring and conduit for condition.

5. Check motor for excessive heat and noise.

6. Check air passages and windings (i.e., clean away dust).

7. Check starter and contacts.

8. Oil or grease motor bearing as required.

9. Measure current draw and record every six (6) months.

G. AIR FILTERS
Change filters when the pressure drop across the filters exceeds the recommended allowable pressure drop, or when the physical condition of the filter element warrants. The media used for replacement shall be equal to or shall exceed the efficiency rating of the original equipment. Some air handler units require charcoal charged elements. Filters will be charged to the City as materials.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
96 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
H. BOILERS AND/OR DOMESTIC HOT WATER SUPPLY (every six (6) months)

1. Check all mountings and fastenings for tightness.

2. Check hand holes and manholes for tightness.

3. Check boiler access doors and plates for leakage.

4. Check all control devices for proper operation.

5. Check safety relief valve.

6. Check flame safeguard relay for proper operation.

7. Check flue gas temperature.

8. Check boiler jacket insulation for deterioration and repair.

9. Inspect boiler base for signs of rust and repair.

10. Check boiler flue piping to chimney for leaks.

11. Clean and inspect firebox.

12. Re-seal inspection plates if needed.

13.Flush rust from water level control and boiler.

14. Check and clean water make-up valve.

I. CONDENSER WATER PUMPS (Quarterly)

1. Check pump head for operation, wear, etc.

2. Check mechanical seal or stuffing box for leaks.

3. Check motor and pump mounting. Tighten if needed.

4. Check attached piping insulation. Repair if necessary.

5. Check wiring and conduit for condition from motor to starter.

6. Check general condition for rust and re-paint if necessary.

7. Inspect all hand valves for leaks.

8. Check and lubricate motor and pump head bearings.

9. Check motor pump coupling for alignment, condition, and security to shaft.

J. CHILLED WATER PUMPS
Same as condenser water pumps, shown above.

K. COOLING TOWER

1. Drain and clean annually.

2. Lubricate motor and fan bearings annually and as needed.

3. Check/adjust V-belts monthly; replace as needed.

4. Check for proper operation every six (6) months.

5. Notify water treatment service contractor of water change.

6. Inspect/clean/adjust/lubricate/repair auxiliary filtering system monthly.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
97 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
L. WATER CHILLERS

1. Perform manufacturer recommended annual maintenance.

2. Perform manufacturer recommended every six (6) months maintenance.

3. Inspect/test safety and other associated sensors and equipment as recommended by manufacturer and/or according to industry standard.

4. Clean condenser tubes every other year. City will pay for gaskets as separate item.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
98 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
TERMS

1. This agreement does not obligate City to any particular amount of work to be completed by Contractor.

2. All employees of Contractor shall wear uniforms clearly identifying them as employees of Contractor at all times while on City premises for the purpose of completing work.

3. City reserves the right to halt work at any time for noncompliance with this agreement, or unsafe work conditions or practices.

4. Any changes to the original scope will need to be authorized by Project Manager before proceeding.

5. Contractor shall warranty all work for a minimum of ninety days after the completion of the work. Any work required to remedy problems with installation or materials shall be at the sole cost of Contractor within this ninety-day period.

COMPENSATION

6. City shall compensate Contractor at the rates set forth on the following page.

Rates may be increased once every 12 months beginning January 1, 2027 in an amount not to exceed industry-standard rate increases. Any rate increase shall be submitted in writing to the Project Manager at least thirty (30) days before the rate increase takes effect.

7. City shall compensate Contractor for parts. Contractor shall provide parts to complete the agreed upon tasks at the best possible pricing and the parts shall not exceed published retail pricing unless authorized by City.

8. Contractor shall make reasonable efforts to use original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts or comparable high quality/warrantable parts and materials.

9. All part/material warranties will be provided to City upon job completion.

Contractor is responsible for warranty claims to their part/material vendors on any parts/material it installs.

10.Upon City’s request only, Contractor must provide receipts or invoices for all parts/materials used in the services to verify parts/materials pricing.

11.Compensation for travel time is embedded in the unit rates listed below.

Contractor shall not charge separately for travel time.

12.Expedited shipping costs on parts must be agreed upon by City before vendor places the order.

13.Contractor shall deliver all invoices via email to maintenance[email protected].

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
99 Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Cost for monthly HVAC Preventative Maintenance Services $7,825 per Month
Includes normal, consumable maintenance supplies, i.e. lubricant, rags, solvents, cleaning solutions.

Cost for repairs to HVAC Systems in City-Owned Buildings $135 Regular hourly rate*
*Applies during regular business hours of Monday to Friday, from 6:00am to 4:00pm, excluding holidays.
$202.50 Overtime hourly rate**
**Applies during weekends, and between 4:00pm and 6:00am Monday to Friday.
$270 Holiday hourly rate***
***Applies during the Holidays below as listed in Attachment C to the agreement:

New Year’s Day
Martin Luther King Day
President’s Day
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veteran’s Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
New Year’s Eve
Cost of all materials plus 25% markup.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
100

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Consultant/Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:

1. Commercial General Liability, including operations, products, and completed operations, as applicable:
$5,000,000 per occurrence/$10,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form of insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability:
$2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer's Liability:

Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1,000,000 Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. A waiver of subrogation is required for Workers’ Compensation insurance. If Consultant/Contractor is a sole proprietor, then they must sign “Contractor Release of Liability.”
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City of Livermore. The City of Livermore reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:

VII and accepted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Livermore.

Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, and designated volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant/Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant/Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

Revised 9/21/2015 B4 – 5M

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
101

2. The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. The additional insured coverage under the Consultant’s/Contractor’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 04 13. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City of Livermore before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

4. The Consultant’s/Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

5. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party before expiration of the policy unless notice is delivered in accordance with policy provisions.

6. It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of, the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured; whichever is greater.

7. Certificate Holder section of the insurance certificate should read: City of Livermore, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Verification of Coverage
Consultant/Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsement(s) effecting coverage to the City of Livermore for approval. The endorsements shall be on forms acceptable to the City of Livermore. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before work commences. The City of Livermore reserves the right to require complete and certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement.

Revised 9/21/2015 B4 – 5M

Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
102
Docusign Envelope ID: 6FF22B73-8F61-4B76-BDED-2E82D7D3CC31

EXHIBIT A
103
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6.1
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Hearing to consider a request for Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan Design Review and Conditional Use Permit to develop vacant land located at the northwest corner of the Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive intersection, with a residential project known as Cornerstone.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt resolutions:

1. Finding that the project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (c), Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan, and California Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning;

2. Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 8669 – Subdivision (SUB) 22-006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; the requested Density Bonus Waivers and Incentive/Concessions; and the No Net Loss findings; and

3. Directing the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.

SUMMARY
The Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (Specific Plan) guides development in the northwestern part of Livermore. It seeks to create a complete neighborhood with a mix of uses that is walkable, bikeable, and served by transit. The City Council adopted the amended Specific Plan and its Supplemental Environmental Impact Report in November 2020. The proposed site and project are one of several new developments within the Specific Plan area.

The applicant proposes 253 residences, of which 143 units will be for-sale condominium units with six units affordable to moderate-income households, and 110 units will be for-rent units that will be 104
affordable to low-, lower, very low- and extremely low-income households. The project also includes a public neighborhood park, pocket park and pedestrian and bicycle path. The project site is shown on Attachment 2 and Attachment 3.

The project is consistent with the General Plan and will make progress towards meeting the City's current Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) housing unit allocation. The project implements the Specific Plan, is consistent with required development standards, and conforms to required design standards and guidelines. The use and density are consistent and compatible with surrounding properties and the Livermore Municipal Airport, the site is of a size and shape that can accommodate the use, and the project will be adequately served by all necessary utilities and services. The project conforms with the provisions of the California Housing Crisis Act and State density bonus law and is exempt from further California Environmental Quality Act review.

DISCUSSION

BACKGROUND
In November of 2020, the City Council adopted the amended Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (Specific Plan). The Specific Plan, which was originally adopted in 2018, covers approximately 1,138 acres in the northwest part of the City, surrounding the Isabel Avenue/Interstate-580 interchange. The Specific Plan allows and facilitates future land uses and public improvements in the Isabel Neighborhood to create a complete and vibrant neighborhood with a mix of housing, businesses, and community uses.

The Isabel Neighborhood will address citywide goals by providing increased transportation options, housing choices, and supporting economic vitality. Residents and workers will have access to regional and local transit, a variety of amenities, and basic services for meeting daily needs, such as a grocery store and restaurants. The future Valley Link regional rail service will have a station in the I-580 median at Isabel with transit and pedestrian connections to the Isabel neighborhood.

The Specific Plan proposes development of a complete, transit-oriented neighborhood that includes up to approximately 4,095 new attached single-family and multi-family housing units, approximately 1,000 of which will be affordable housing units. In addition, the Specific Plan includes new office, business park, and commercial development (including a neighborhood commercial center), three new neighborhood parks, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and infrastructure improvements. The Specific Plan is intended to streamline the City’s development review process for development of the type and character contemplated in the Specific Plan Area. However, all of the Plan’s development projects require review through the City's entitlement process. The Cornerstone project is the sole residential project in the Specific Plan Subarea 2d and meets the land use and density requirements of this subarea.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project would develop vacant land located northwest of the Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive intersection (APNs: 905-0015-026, 905-0015-027, 905-0015-028, 905-0015-029, and 905-0015-008), implementing the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan. The applicant, Cornerstone, proposes: (a) 253 residences, of which 143 units will be for-sale condominium units with six units affordable to moderate-income households, and 110 units will be for-rent units that will be affordable to low-, lower, very low- and extremely low-income households; (b) public open space areas including a neighborhood park along Constitution Drive, a pedestrian and bicycle path along Collier Canyon Creek connecting Collier Canyon Road with Constitution Drive, a pocket park along the project's new Collier 105
Canyon Creek path, and an off-site pedestrian and a bicycle path from the site to North Canyons Parkway (see Attachment 3, Sheet TM 3.0); and (c) street frontage landscaping and connections from units to public streets.

The applicant has submitted for relief under the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (CA SB330) and Density Bonus under Government Code section 65915, including requesting two concessions and 11 waivers to:
exceed the Scenic Corridor height limit for the five-story apartment building and some of the three-story townhomes, not evenly distribute the affordable units throughout the project, not have affordable units be comparable with market-rate units, and some minor deviations from design standards (see Attachment 1, Affordable Housing section of Planning Commission Staff Memorandum). In addition, a No Net Loss analysis was done in Attachment 1 consistent with state law which concluded the City’s overall capacity for Lower-Income and Above Moderate-Income units is adequate to meet the Livermore's remaining RHNA allocation for the planning period. Therefore, there is no net loss (See Attachments 1 and 4).

The proposed project requires City Council approval of the following land use entitlements:

Vesting Tentative Tract Map (SUB 22-006) to subdivide the property into 22 building lots, three lots for the public neighborhood park, pocket park, and path, numerous additional smaller lots for circulation and landscaping;
Site Plan Design Review (SPDR 22-004) for review of the proposed site design, architecture, and landscaping;
Conditional Use Permit (CUP 24-009) for grading that is within 150 feet of Collier Canyon Creek.

DESCRIPTION, CONTEXT, AND ANALYSIS
For a complete project description, site context, and analysis of applicable State and local standards, please review the attached Planning Commission Staff Memorandum (Attachment 1).

PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC COMMENT
On December 17, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a public hearing and unanimously voted to recommend the City Council approve the Project subject to minor modifications to the design of the pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Collier Canyon Road and Gateway Avenue.

The Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes summarize the discussion (Attachment 5), which included public comments regarding the use of local labor for construction of the project.

The Planning Commission discussed the proposed zoning, environmental analysis, site plan, stormwater facilities, and anticipated community benefits.

Finally, the Planning Commission approved Consistency Determination (CD) 24-010 by Resolution No. 49-24, determining that the City’s acquisition through dedication in-fee of approximately 2.5 acres of the project site for use as public park is consistent with General Plan policies (Attachment 6). A detailed analysis of the Consistency Determination is included in Attachment 1. The Planning Commission is the final review authority for Consistency Determinations, so the City Council does not need to act on that entitlement.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
106
As described in the Environmental Resolution, the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Government Code 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182(c), which exempts residential projects that implement a Specific Plan and Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, which exempts projects consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
There are no significant fiscal or administrative impacts associated with the project. Staff time allocated to land use entitlement review is offset by required entitlement application fees. The incremental increase in demand for water, sewer, and stormwater services will be offset by required impact fees and utility connection fees. All new onsite streets, the pocket park, and landscaping will be privately maintained by the project’s Homeowners’ Association (HOA). As is Livermore's practice, onsite water and sewer lines would be maintained by the City, the costs of which would be covered by user fees. The project would also annex into the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Community Facilities District to pay for offsite public improvements that will help serve the future residents of this project. In addition, the future public park acquired through in-fee dedication as part of the project will be improved by the developer and maintained by the Livermore Area Recreation and Parks District (LARPD), with no burden on the General Fund. Consistent with City policy, the developer will get park fee credits for qualified park improvements and land dedication.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
2: Economy that Prospers
GOAL
4: Implement the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan

GUIDING DOCUMENTS
General Plan
Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan
Development Code
Citywide Design Standards and Guidelines

ATTACHMENTS

1. Planning Commission Staff Analysis Memorandum

2. Location Maps

3. Development Plans

4. Summary of No Net Loss

5. Draft Planning Commission Minutes 12-17-24

6. Planning Commission Consistency Determination Resolution

7. Resolution - Environmental

8. Exhibit A - Planning Commission Environmental Resolution

9. Exhibit B - Initial Study
107

10. Resolution - Project

11. Exhibit A - Planning Commission Project Resolution

12. Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval
Prepared by: Emily LaDue
Assistant Planner
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
108
ATTACHMENT 1

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF MEMORANDUM
1 TO: Chairperson Anderson and
Members of the Planning Commission
PREPARED BY: Emily LaDue, Assistant Planner
Vernon Umetsu, Contract Planner
REVIEWED BY: Stephen Riley, Planning Manager
DATE: December 17, 2024
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Map) 8669 – Subdivision (SUB) 22- 006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009 and Consistency Determination (CD) 24-010 for 143 for-sale condominium residential units and two (2) market rate apartments and 108 for-rent affordable apartments that will rent at prices that are: low, lower-, very low and extremely low; at the northwest corner of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive. The project is known as Cornerstone.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project would develop the vacant, 13.09-acre lot at the northwest corner of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive with a total 253 residential units (units). The proposed Development Plans for the subdivision, architecture, and landscaping are shown in Attachment 3 to this staff report.

There are 143, for-sale townhomes in 21 buildings that have four to nine units in each building. The townhomes have three architectural styles, and range in size from 922 to 2,004 square feet, have front porches and decks, and attached, two-car garages (except that three units have one-car garages).

There are 110 for-rent apartments in one, T-shaped building with five stories. Apartment units are designed as one-story flats, that range in size from 411 square feet to 1,079 square feet. Parking is provided on the first floor as 87 podium parking spaces, and 17 uncovered spaces.
109
ATTACHMENT 1
2 Of the proposed 253 units, 114 will be deed-restricted affordable units. Six of the for-sale townhome units will be priced for moderate income households (making 120% of the Area Median Income), with the remainder sold at market rate. Of the 110 for-rent apartments, 108 will be affordable units1 with rental prices as follows:
 20% of units to be priced for Low-income households making 80% of the Area Median Income
 60%of units to be priced for Lower-income households making 60% of the Area Median Income
 10% of units to be priced for Very Low-income households making 50% of the Area Median Income and
 10% of units to be priced for Extremely Low-income households making 30% of the Area Median Income.

The project will improve and dedicate four areas for park and recreation uses as shown on Attachment 3 of the staff report, as summarized below:

1. A 2.53-acre parcel will be improved and dedicated to the City and managed by the LAPRD, as a public park along Constitution Drive. Amenities include walking paths, picnic areas, a play area, and a multipurpose lawn. This park area includes the existing property owner's offer to dedicate an approximately 50-foot-wide strip to allow the widening of I-580 for the future Valley Link regional rail project.

2. A pocket park with a public access easement on Parcel J (in the northwest corner of the site adjacent to Collier Creek) will be improved with bike parking, a community garden area, and optional play area.

3. A public 1,490-foot-long trail easement along Collier Creek will be improved to link Constitution Drive in the southwest property corner with Collier Canyon Road on the property's northeast corner that will also be extended off-site, to North Canyons Parkway.

4. An easement for a future pedestrian/bicycle bridge across Collier Creek, and a $200,000 contribution as the project's fair share portion of the cost of the bridge across Collier Canyon Creek per the attached Conditions of Approval (Attachment 11), and

5. Street improvements along Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive, including marked on street parking and potentially improved bicycle infrastructure.

The proposed project requires approval of the following entitlement applications:
 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8669 (SUB 22-006), which subdivides the property and establishes the site grading, circulation and supporting infrastructure.

1 Two units will be occupied by on-site managers as market rate units. 110
ATTACHMENT 1
3  Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, for review of the proposed site design, architecture and landscaping,
 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009, to review proposed grading that is within 150 feet of the Collier Canyon Creek top of bank, and
 Consistency Determination (CD) 24-010, to determine if the City's in-fee acquisition of the 2.53-acre Parcel M of SUB 22-006, is consistent with the General Plan.

The State of California encourages the production of affordable housing through its Density Bonus statute [California Government Code Section 65915-65918]. These provisions are for projects with a certain percentage of units for low- to extremely lowincome households. Staff has determined that this project qualifies for the requested two concessions and eleven waivers from City development standards, to allow the project to be built at the proposed density. The concessions are: (a) to allow 108 affordable units to be in the one apartment building and (b) to allow affordable units to be concentrated in the rental apartment building instead of dispersed through the rental units and the forsale units.. Four waivers are related to building design and view protection, and seven waivers are related to comparability of the affordable for-rent and for-sale units with the for-sale market rate units. Since the concessions and waivers do not compromise health and safety or violate State or Federal law, the concessions and waivers must be granted.

Attachment 3 to the staff report (Development Plans) shows the project with the requested waivers.

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT
The Cornerstone site is a vacant, 13.09-acre parcel, that is located at the northwest corner of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive as shown in Attachment 2 to the staff report – Site Location. Photos of the site and surrounding areas are shown in Attachment 3 and Attachment 2. The site is a grassland field with 39 protected trees in the north portion of the site, and the Collier Canyon Creek along the west and north boundary. The site is largely flat except for the Collier Canyon Creek banks.

The site is generally bounded by Constitution Drive and I-580 on the south and business park and office uses on all other sides, with Collier Canyon Creek flowing through the north and west property lines. The following table summarizes the General Plan land use designation, current zoning classification, and existing land use on the subject property and surrounding properties.
111
ATTACHMENT 1
4 Table 1: Project Site Context
General Plan
Designation
Current Zoning
Classification
Existing Land Use
(Refer to Attachment 3 and
Attachment 2, Figure 1)
Subject
Site
Isabel
Neighborhood
Isabel Neighborhood
Specific Plan shows 3
zones on this site per
INSP Ch. 2, Figure 2-1:
(1) Village and (2) Center
zones for this parcel are to
have a combined
minimum 200 units and a
maximum 286 units (INSP
Ch. 2, Figure 2-3 and
Table 2-6 for Subarea 2d)
and (3) Open Space -
New Neighborhood
Park/Plaza
Vacant
North Isabel
Neighborhood
Isabel Neighborhood
Specific Plan: Office
Collier Canyon Creek then
offices beyond
South Isabel
Neighborhood
Isabel Neighborhood
Specific Plan: Existing
Street and Valley Link
beyond
Constitution Drive and
I-580/Valley Link alignment
East Isabel
Neighborhood
Isabel Neighborhood
Specific Plan:

Office Core,
Village (25-40 du/ac)
Business Park
Collier Canyon Road, then
office and business park
beyond and the approved
future Isable Crossing mixed
use project.

West Isabel
Neighborhood
Isabel Neighborhood
Specific Plan: Open
Space (Collier Canyon
Creek) then
Office and Business Park
Collier Canyon Creek then
office and business park
beyond

STAFF ANALYSIS
General Plan
The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan. The Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan seeks to create a safe, vibrant, complete neighborhood; ensure that new development is compatible with existing 112
ATTACHMENT 1
5 development and community character; and support transit ridership and citywide goals for increased transportation options and housing choices (Livermore General Plan Land Use Element, p. 3-23). The proposal to develop the project site with a residential use is consistent with the "Village" and "Center" land use designations, with the proposed public parks per the Open Space designation and implements the General Plan goals for the Isabel Neighborhood.

The proposal supports the Land Use Element and the 2023-2031 Housing Element to develop housing for all income levels, on a location that is near major transit stops by:

1. Providing 253 housing units for all income levels within 1/4-mile of a major bus transit stop (Route 30R) at the intersection of Triad Drive and North Canyons Parkway

2. Provide 108 rental apartments that are priced for affordability to low, lower, very low, and extremely low-income households as discussed in Project Description (above),

3. Increase the housing options within Livermore by providing a mix of smaller, affordable, residential rental unit sizes (411, 547, and 791 square-foot units per Attachment 3), and

4. Provide 143 for sale townhome condominiums, six of which are priced for affordability to moderate-income households.

The Applicant would increase alternative transportation options by providing a landscaped parkway and sidewalk on Collier Canyon Road. The project would also provide a new, lighted, pervious, hard-surface pedestrian and bicycle path along Collier Canyon Creek, to join Constitution Drive and Collier Canyon Road, and extend to North Canyons Parkway per the attached Conditions of Approval. Previously dedicated right-ofway and utility easements along the streets would remain and no new street-facing road and utility easements are needed.

The project will also be providing open space/park dedications and improvements which, in combination, will exceed the common open space area required per the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan for a 3-acre, neighborhood park (INSP Chapter 4 (pg. 4-6)), and the 18,975 sq. ft. of Common Open Space required per INSP Chapter 4, Table 2-2.

The proposed public common open space improvements are described below:

1. A new 2.3-acre, neighborhood park is identified at the south end of the development in INSP Chapter 4 (pg. 4-6). The project will build this park along Constitution Drive, as located on Parcel M of Attachment 3. A conceptual park design is shown on Attachment 3. The park area will be reduced by approximately 50 feet for the future relocation of Constitution Drive, as needed to build the Valley Link rail system along I580.

2. A new, 0.4-acre, pocket park with public access will also be built on Parcel J. A conceptual park design is shown in Attachment 3.
113
ATTACHMENT 1
6 3. Along Collier Canyon Creek: the project will provide a new, minimum 10-foot wide by 1,490-foot long, lighted, multi-use trail that connects Constitution Drive with Collier Canyon Road, and extends off-site to North Canyon Parkway.

4. An easement for a future bridge crossing of Collier Canyon Creek will be dedicated per INSP Chapter 4, Figure 4-1 (pg. 4-8) and Chapter 3, Figure 3-12 (pg. 3-13). In addition, the Applicant will be conditioned to provide a $200,000 fair share contribution towards the future construction cost of the bridge across Collier Canyon Creek, per Pedestrian and Bike Bridge C-14 in INSP Chapter 3, Figure 3-12 (pg. 3- 13), and Chapter 4, Figurer 4-1 (pg. 4-7). This public improvement is similar to the requirement to build the neighborhood park and public road improvements that serve the area, which are identified in the General Plan and Specific Plans.

The General Plan Community Character Element and INSP Chapter 5 contains objectives and policies to encourage high quality design that enhances Livermore’s urban design quality, prohibits exterior facades with minimal detailing, and ensures compatibility with existing development. The proposed project achieves these objectives and policies by providing three different townhome architectural styles - Farmhouse, Craftsman, and Regency, with detailing that includes inset windows, extruded porches, wall articulation, and colors and materials changes to support the wall articulation and architectural details (see Attachment 3). Similar building articulation, colors and materials changes, and window fenestration is provided as part of the apartment building's mix of more contemporary building wall architecture and traditional, sloped roof with gables (see colored building perspectives on Attachment 3). The project's streetscape with trees on Collier Canyon Road, and the Neighborhood Park along Constitution Drive are shown in Attachment 3.

The project implements policies in the Climate Change Element. For example, the project provides residences near existing job centers and within 1/4-mile walking distance of LAVTA transit service (Route 30R) at Triad Drive and North Canyons Parkway, and extends a permeable, hard-surface, off-site path next to the off-site sidewalk, as an enhanced link from the project site to North Canyons Parkway and the transit stop beyond.

The project also complies with City requirements for water conservation and energy efficiency and implements Climate Best Management Practices by providing waste stream separation (e.g., recycling and yard waste containers), and use of reclaimed water for landscape irrigation. Electric vehicle charging stations will be provided in both the townhome garages and apartment building parking, 2 chargers per garage and 13 stalls respectively. The combined surface parking for both the townhomes and the apartments will provide 37 EV stalls.

No Net Loss Law
California Government Code Section 65863 establishes the state’s No Net Loss standards (summary attached as Attachment 4). Generally, the standards require that:

1. Each local jurisdiction’s Housing Element Sites Inventory accommodates all required RHNA units at all times.
114
ATTACHMENT 1
7 2. If the City approves a Project that contains less units than anticipated in the Sites Inventory, or modifies the Zoning to allow for less units than anticipated in the Sites Inventory, then the Sites Inventory must have enough remaining sites/units to accommodate the jurisdiction’s RHNA requirement for all required affordability levels. Or, if there are not enough units in the remaining Sites Inventory to accommodate the RHNA requirements, then the City must increase the amount of residential units permitted (aka “upzoning”) elsewhere in the City to satisfy the RHNA requirement.

The project would subdivide and develop six existing parcels, all of which are identified in the Housing Element’s Site Inventory. Together, the Site Inventory identifies these parcels’ development capacity at 173 lower-income units and 177 above moderateincome units.

Although the project exceeds the required percentage of affordable units as described in the affordable housing section of this report, the project provides 108 lower income units compared to Housing Element’s assumed 173 lower-income units, resulting in a 65-unit deficit. The project provides 139 above moderate units compared to the 177 Above Moderate-Income units assumed in the Housing Element Sites Inventory, resulting in a 38-unit deficit. However, based on the Site Inventory and housing projects approved within the 2023-2031 RHNA Cycle, the City currently has a surplus of 120 Lower Income units, 264 Moderate Income units, and 804 Above Moderate units. This surplus is sufficient to offset the project deficit and result in an overall City surplus as shown in the table below:

Lower Income Moderate Income Above Moderate
Housing Element
Sites Inventory
RHNA Requirement
for the Cornerstone
project site
173 0 177
Proposed
Cornerstone Project
108 6 139
Housing
Element/Approved
Project Surplus
120 264 804
Net Difference and
City-wide surplus
compared to RHNA
allocation.
+55 +270 +766
Per the findings in the attached project resolution, the City’s overall capacity for LowerIncome and Above Moderate-Income units is adequate to meet the jurisdiction’s remaining RHNA allocation for the planning period. Therefore, there is no net loss.

Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan
115
ATTACHMENT 1
8 Use and Density
The two residential zones located on this project site are shown in Attachment 2 to the staff report. The proposed three-story townhome units are proposed for the site area zoned as Village, to be consistent with that zoning designation. Similarly, the proposed five-story apartment building is proposed for the site area zoned Center, to be consistent with that zoning designation.

The Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (INSP) establishes minimum and maximum densities in each subarea in order to appropriately manage growth and ensure adequate housing supply. The project site is in INSP Subarea 2d, with the site having zoning of: (a) Center (40-60 dwellings/acre), (b) Village (25-40 dwellings/acre), and (c) Open Space - New Neighborhood Park/Plaza. The proposed 253 housing units are between the minimum required 200 units and the maximum allowed 286 units (INSP, Chapter 2, Table 2-6). Therefore, the proposed 143 townhomes and 110 apartments are consistent with the INSP density envisioned for this site.

Policies
The project is consistent with the policies established in the Specific Plan, including:
 P-LU-6: Ensure that land uses are compatible with existing residential uses and minimize conflicts between adjacent land uses with respect to scale, safety, noise, privacy, and other potential nuisances and hazards.
 P-LU-17: Ensure that all new development provides ample landscaped areas, private open space, common open space, and publicly accessible open space. Up to 10 percent of the common area requirement may be satisfied through the provision of common indoor areas.
 P-LU-22: Site plans must incorporate pathways to the larger street network, and, where feasible, the open space and trails network.
 P-LU-30: Each product type within new residential developments shall provide at least two-unit types which differ in the number of bedrooms.  G-TRA-2: Establish a comfortable, safe, and efficient network for pedestrians and bicyclists.

The project is compatible with the surrounding office and business park uses that are beyond the adjacent streets and Collier Canyon Creek, exceeds required landscaping and publicly accessible common open space, provides pedestrian pathways as well as a new, lighted pedestrian and bicycle path along Collier Canyon Creek from the project's interior to adjacent streets and a trail extension on Collier Canyon Road off-site to North Canyons Parkway, and provides townhomes and apartments with floor plans ranging from studio to four bedroom unit types. These proposed improvements are shown in Attachment 3 and discussed in Project Description.
116
ATTACHMENT 1
9 Livermore Municipal Airport
The Livermore Municipal Airport is located approximately 1/2-mile south of the project site. In order to protect the airport’s operations and to ensure safety and compatibility of surrounding uses, the County established the Livermore Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Compatibility Plan). The Compatibility Plan applies to all properties within the Airport Influence Area, which generally extends from Santa Rita Road to North Livermore Avenue, and from Stanley Boulevard to north of the City Boundary.

A majority of the Isabel Neighborhood is located within the designated Airport Influence Area, including the project site. During its adoption, the Specific Plan was found to be consistent with the Compatibility Plan with respect to building heights, uses, and noise levels. Given that the project is within the allowed density and use of the Specific Plan, it is also consistent with the Compatibility Plan. However, both the Compatibility Plan and Specific Plan require the provision of avigation easements and buyer awareness measures for properties within the Influence Area [INSP P-ENV-1]. The Engineering conditions of approval include the avigation easement requirements. To ensure airport operations remain protected and property owners remain informed about potential noise impacts, staff also recommends the following Condition:

Recommended Condition: Prior to occupancy, applicant shall record the deed notification provided in the Livermore Executive Airport - Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Chapter 3.3.4.6, on the property for which this discretionary development permit is issued, as follows:

NOTICE OF AIRPORT IN VICINITY
This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence area. For that reason, the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you complete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to you.

The Specific Plan also contains development standards that regulate height, setbacks, and bulk, which are discussed further in the Site Plan Design Review section of this report.

Subdivision - Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8669
Lot Size and Residential Condominiums
The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8669 (Map) will subdivide the existing 13.09- acre vacant parcel into a total of 22 numbered building lots. Lettered Parcels J, L, and M will be used for publicly accessible open space lots and remaining lettered lots will be used for interior streets. All lots are shown on Attachment 3. 117
ATTACHMENT 1
10 The Specific Plan does not establish minimum or maximum residential lot sizes or dimensions. However, for reference, the lots range in size from Lot 17 with 0.15 acre for a four-plex townhome, to Lot 22 with 1.66 acres for the 110-unit apartment building. The residential lots are of a typical size and shape for condominium style multifamily housing and can adequately accommodate the use. The proposed Map includes all shared common and open space areas and private trash collection areas (i.e. within townhome garages and the podium parking enclosure), as required by Livermore’s Subdivision Ordinance. A Map will be filed with the State of California Department of Real Estate if the entitlement is approved, pursuant to State standards.

Circulation, Streets, and Traffic
Project vehicular connections to the public streets and on-site driveways are shown on Attachment 3. Two project driveways provide vehicle access onto Collier Canyon Road.

All parcels would have access to the public right-of-way via two new driveways, in conformance with Livermore’s Development Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. All new driveways would have a minimum 26-foot width, which exceeds the minimum dimensions established by the Development Code and City Standard Details and would be privately maintained by the project’s Homeowners’ Association (HOA).

A sidewalk would be built along Collier Canyon Road with a 5-foot-wide parkway and 5- foot-wide sidewalk. In addition, an off-site hard-surface public trail along Collier Canyon Road, from the north end of the project site to North Canyons Parkway, will be designed and built. The existing, 5-foot-wide sidewalk on Constitution Drive will remain. It will be rebuilt when this street is relocated as part of the Valley Link rail line construction.

On-site pedestrian and bicycle paths as well as pedestrian-only paths connect residences with the adjacent streets and the common/public open space, parks, trails and future pedestrian and bike bridge over Collier Canyon Creek.

Proposed sidewalks will meet both Livermore development standards and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The proposed sidewalks thus promote a strong project connection between public and private areas per City Design Standards and Guidelines.

Alternative Transportation
The City maintains an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) that identifies existing and proposed, required trails and bike lanes throughout the City, and identifies key locations for new bicycle lane and trail segments, in order to promote connectivity and encourage use of alternative modes of transportation. As stated in the ATP, Specific Plan standards with respect to active transportation take precedence in the Isabel Neighborhood.

The project will build a new, lighted pedestrian and bicycle trail along Collier Canyon Creek, that links Constitution Drive with Collier Canyon Road. Per Pedestrian and Bike Bridge C-14 in INSP Chapter 3, Figure 3-12 (pg. 3-13), the applicant will dedicate an easement across Collier Canyon Creek and contribute $200,000 towards building a 118
ATTACHMENT 1
11 future bridge across the Creek. In addition, the project will design and build an off-site public trail next to the existing sidewalk along Collier Canyon Road, from the north end of the project site to North Canyons Parkway. The path and sidewalk will provide an improved pedestrian link from the project site to the bus transit stops at Triad Drive and North Canyons Parkway.

Bicycle lanes on both Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive are Existing Class II, in Chapter 2, Figure 3-15 (INSP Bicycle Circulation Plan). No change to the existing bicycle lane on Constitution Drive is proposed due to this street's pending relocation for construction due to the Valley Link rail line construction. In addition, there is a condition of approval to maintain the bike lane to the extent feasible on Collier Canyon Road while also adding marked parking spaces on that street. Finally, the applicant will install a new east-west crosswalk across the intersection of Collier Canyon Road and Gateway Avenue that will provide a safe connection to the core of the INSP and the future Valley Link station.

Parking
The INSP establishes vehicular parking requirements INSP Chapter 3, Table 3-2 (pg. 3- 26). However, State regulations over-ride local regulations as discussed in Project Description above2. Per Government Code (GC) Section 65915(p)(2)(A): the City may not require more than 0.5 parking spaces for all project units (but the applicant can choose to provide more spaces). This reduced development standard is a Statemandated Density Bonus development standard that replaces all local parking standards.

The project meets the State required parking standards for the proposed for townhomes and apartments as follows:

1. Townhomes: One-hundred forty (140) townhome units have 2 garage spaces per unit (280 spaces), three townhome units have one garage space per unit, and 19 uncovered guest parking spaces, and one handicapped parking space are provided for a total of 303 parking spaces.

2. Apartments: The 110 apartment units are provided with 104 parking spaces. This parking consists of 75 stacker spaces and 29 single spaces. All spaces are within the podium parking garage except for 17 outside spaces.

2 In the specific case of parking, only units that are affordable by lower-income households or below can be used to qualify for parking waivers. The project also provides an additional 22 units that are affordable to low-income households (i.e., that have a higher income limit than lower-income households). This project has 66 lower-income units, 11 very-low-income units, and 11 extremely low income units (see Project Description). The project therefore provides 88 units that are affordable to lower-income households or below, out of 253 total project units, or 34.8%. The project thus provides over 20% of its units affordable to lower income households and qualifies for reduced parking that the City must approve.
119
ATTACHMENT 1
12 The proposed 407 parking spaces for 253 residences, is a minimum 1.60 spaces per unit. The minimum State required parking at 0.5 spaces per unit is thus met.

Utilities, Services, and Infrastructure
The Infrastructure and Public Services element of the General Plan and the City’s Subdivision ordinance require that all new developments provide adequate utilities and services such as water conveyance, sewer conveyance, and urban fire protection. The Specific Plan EIR found that at Specific Plan buildout, the City’s existing utility and service systems would have adequate capacity to serve all new development in the Isabel Neighborhood. The project density is within the range contemplated by the Specific Plan. Therefore, existing utility and service systems will have sufficient capacity to serve the project.

On-site utility improvements are shown on Attachment 3. All on-site utilities, services and infrastructure will meet City of Livermore development standards as illustrated below:

1. Emergency service access will be provided from two driveways on Collier Canyon Road, minimum 26-foot-wide driveways and roof access to the five-story apartment building is provided,

2. Water, Sewer, and Power will be provided from lines along Collier Canyon Road, and

3. Trash and recycling containers will be located in garages for townhomes. Apartments will have trash and recycling containers in a common area in the podium parking structure. The trash service plan shows how both the townhome units and apartment building will be served (Attachment 3).

Grading and Soils
The applicant has provided: (a) a grading plan, (b) a geotechnical report that shows no hazardous conditions on site, with recommended construction measures to ensure that the proposed buildings will meet California Building Code standards that will be implemented during building permit plan review as is normally done, and (c) a Phase I environmental assessment which shows no hazardous contamination. The site is relatively flat, except for the steeper banks of Collier Canyon Creek.

The City Engineer has found the grading plan to meet all City grading standards, the geotechnical report has found the site suitable for development, and the Phase I study has not identified any potential subsurface hazards.

Site Plan Design Review
The Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan establishes residential development standards that regulate height, setbacks, and design standards and guidelines that regulate design for all sites within the plan area. The City also utilizes citywide Design Standards and Guidelines that generally apply to all residential projects throughout Livermore. The project complies 120
ATTACHMENT 1
13 with the development standards for the Specific Plan’s Center and Village areas and the residential Design Standards and Guidelines (subject to Density Bonus waivers) as described below.

Development Standards
Developm
ent
Criteria
INSP Ch. 2
Village
Area
INSP Standard Proposed Analysis
Height
(INSP
Table 2-2)
Minimum
height
Two stories for the
Village and Center
zones
Townhomes in the Village zone will be
three stories high and the apartment
building in the Center zone will be five
feet high
Complies
Maximum
height
Three stories in
the Village zone
and five stories in
the Center zone.

Maximum heights
and compliance
with the City’s
Scenic Corridor
policy are not
applicable as a
waiver from
maximum building
heights has been
requested and
must be granted
(see Project
Description)
Townhomes in the Village zone will be
three stories.

The apartment building in the Center
zone will be five stories and 61 feet to
the roof ridge, with several nine-foot-high
roof accessory structures for a total of 70
feet.

Complies
based on
State
waiver
Setbacks
(INSP
Table 2-2)
Front
setback
facing
major
streets
20 feet minimum
for buildings
No adjacent major streets Complies
121
ATTACHMENT 1
14 Developm
ent
Criteria
INSP Ch. 2
Village
Area
INSP Standard Proposed Analysis
Setback
facing all
other
streets
10 feet minimum
from Collier
Canyon Road
from Constitution
Drive
Both Collier Canyon Road and
Constitution Drive are Neighborhood
Streets. The setback from Collier Canyon
Road is 35 feet. The setback for
Constitution Drive from the right-of-way
dedication line (50 ft. in from the existing
property line is over 115 feet.

Complies
Interior
Setback
(side/ rear)
Min. 15 ft. where
abutting existing
residential uses;
otherwise, Min. 5
ft. for first and
second stories;
Min. 10 ft. for third
story and above
The project does not abut residential
use. The minimum interior setback is
over 40 feet from the north side of the
apartment building toward the property
line along Collier Canyon Creek
Complies
Building
Separation
Min. 10 ft.
separation
between primary
windows (living,
dining, bedroom)
of residential units.

Porches facing
each other must
be separated by
minimum 15 feet
along paseos.

Minimum porch separation is 15 feet. Complies
Common
Open
Space
75 sq. ft. per unit.
10-foot dimension
in any direction =
18,975 sq. ft.
(0.44-ac.), which
will be part of the
3-acre
Neighborhood
Park
In combination, the neighborhood park
(2.53-ac.), the pocket park (0.4-ac.) and
the new, lighted, 1,490-ft. long, public
trail along Collier Canyon Creek (0.34-
ac), will meet this standard. In addition,
the applicant will build a sidewalk/trail
extension from the north end of their new
sidewalk on Collier Canyon Road,
northward to join the sidewalk and public
trail on North Canyons Parkway.

Complies
Village (for
townhomes)
Over 100 sq. ft. per unit in front porch
and second floor balconies.

Complies
122
ATTACHMENT 1
15 Developm
ent
Criteria
INSP Ch. 2
Village
Area
INSP Standard Proposed Analysis
Private
Open
Space
75 sq. ft. per unit.

Total for 143 units
= 10,075 sq. ft.

Center (for
apartment bldg.)
50 sq. ft. per unit.

Total for 110 units
= 5,500 sq. ft.

State Density Bonus waiver requested
and granted. No private open space
provided. A common outdoor amenity
area is provided on the second floor of
the apartment building for the residents.

Note that the apartment building is also
adjacent to a 17,424 sq. ft. pocket park
Complies
based on
State
waiver
Minimum
On-site
Landscapi
ng
16 Trees per acre
for the 13.09-acre
site = 210 trees
The project would provide 284 trees Complies
Protected
Trees
Protected trees
that are to be
removed to be
replaced per the
Livermore
Municipal Code
Section

12.20.230.B.2.

The project meets the required tree
replacement ratio.

Complies
Design Standards and Guidelines
Compatibility, Siting, and Massing
The citywide Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG) contain design requirements for new development. The DSG aims to create new development that is compatible with existing development, yet is sited properly and broken down into subparts, as follows:
· B.2.1.5 Building design should respect the predominant characteristics of neighborhood development, such as height, massing, setbacks, materials and architectural style.
· B.2.2.1 Planting strips between the sidewalk and the back of the curb are strongly encouraged. They should be a minimum of 5 feet in width. · B.3.1.1 Neighborhood open space should be located to maximize its visual and functional benefits.
· B.6.2.1 Whenever possible, parking lots should be located behind residential 123
ATTACHMENT 1
16 structures, rather than along the primary frontage, to minimize visual impact to the street.
· C.1.1.2 Building massing should be varied by employing a variety of techniques, such as recessed porches, bay windows, dormers and varying planes or setbacks. · C.1.2.1 The massing of larger residential buildings shall be broken down to convey a sense of “home” and give individuality to each unit that lies within it. · C.1.2.3 Façades of long buildings shall be architecturally subdivided into shorter segments every 25 to 50 feet maximum
Along Collier Canyon Road, the proposed, three-story townhomes would have a street facade of four townhome buildings with six units each (131 ft.), an 18-ft. building separation with trees between buildings, and setbacks of 35 ft. with a double row of trees that are planted on both sides of the parkway sidewalk – a double row of trees is an INSP design standard. The proposed apartment building is located in the northern portion of the site. It is 296 feet long, five-stories high (61-ft.), and setback 13.5 ft. behind a similar double row of trees (see Attachment 3). The townhomes are compatible with the 20 to 24 foot high, modern, business park buildings across Collier Canyon Road due to the townhome setbacks and intervening landscaping.

The six-plex townhomes along Collier Canyon Road are architecturally separated into individual units using wall articulation, extruded porch and balcony structures, material and color changes, and detailing. The porches provide a transition from semi-public walkways to semi-private entrance spaces.

The 296-foot-long apartment building is visually separated into three segments that are loosely related to the three pairs of extruded, gable-topped columns, different wall textures between columns, and wall colors that are distinct for each segment (white for the south, darker for the center, and a mix for the north). The 17-foot-high podium parking level forms a dark (heavier) horizontal base that helps to unify the building.

Based on the above, the proposed project respects the neighborhood's development, uses landscaping to minimize the visual impact on the street, and visually reduces building mass by using wall articulation and massing elements, materials and colors. An important element to providing a compatible transition from the street to the project buildings is tree size at installation. Staff recommends that all trees on each side of the Collier Canyon Road sidewalk, at the driveway entries, and the front tree between the buildings facing the public street, be a minimum 24-inch box size with a minimum 8-foot height and not 15-gallon (i.e., 3-4 feet high) as shown in the Conditions of Approval.

Architecture, Colors and Materials
The Specific Plan Design Standards and Guidelines call for traditional or contemporary variations of architectural designs and building materials. Preferred materials are to be durable and generally include stucco, stone, wood, and metal. In addition, the Planning 124
ATTACHMENT 1
17 Commission had previously expressed a desire for incorporating traditional elements into the Specific Plan's contemporary design direction.

The INSP Design Standards and Guidelines aim to create developments with high-quality architectural style, rich materials, and compatible colors, as follows:
 INSP-DS-30: Development shall include a variety of architectural styles, emphasizing contemporary designs and building materials.  INSP-DS-74: The design of townhomes must be articulated such that individual units are differentiated from each other.
 DSG 1.2.4: Each vertical module of units shall incorporate architectural features that help to individually distinguish them, such as wall breaks, projections, distinct color schemes and individual roof treatments.
 DSG-4.1.2: Windows shall be used as architectural elements that add relief to the façade and wall surface.
 DSG-6.1.1: A variety of materials shall be used that emphasize a differentiation between the various components of the building.
 DSG-7.1.1: Exterior building colors should be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood setting and should be in keeping with the geographic and climatic conditions specific to Livermore
The project proposes two product types: three-story townhomes and a five-story (61-ft.) larger apartment building. Townhomes have more traditional architectural styles:

Craftsman, Farmhouse and Regency. Each townhome unit is individualized using wall articulation, extruded porch and balcony structures, material and color changes, and detailing. This is illustrated in the longest row of nine townhome units on Attachment 3.

The five-story apartment building has a more modern design with some traditional design elements. Residential finish materials are used such as the smooth vertical panels at the extruded, gable-topped columns and "stone" panels to create visual breaks along the building's length.

Based on the above, architectural shapes, materials, and color have been used to create a project with buildings that differentiate between their various components, have a design richness, and reflect the design requirements of the Specific Plan and the citywide Design Standards and Guidelines.

Landscape Design
The Design Standards and Guidelines and Specific Plan contain landscape standards related to trees, shrubs, and groundcovers. The standards establish minimum quantity, size, and locational parameters, as follows:
 DSG-1.4.1.a: At time of installation, trees should be a minimum 15-gallon pot size or 6 feet tall and have a one-inch caliper size at chest height, whichever is greater.  DSG-1.4.1.b: At time of installation, all street trees should be 24-inch box size and comply with the City of Livermore Standard Details.
125
ATTACHMENT 1
18  DSG-1.4.1.c: At time of installation, twenty percent of all trees should have a 24- inch box container size or larger.
 DSG-1.4.1.d: At time of installation, shrubs should have a minimum 5-gallon pot size.
 INSP-Table 2-2: Minimum on-site landscaping is 16 trees per acre.

The project’s landscape plan includes a mix of trees, shrubs, grasses, and groundcovers.

The Overall Landscape Plan is shown in Attachment 3. The streetscape reflects a proposed parkway sidewalk with a row of trees on each side on the Collier Canyon Road, and the new neighborhood park on Constitution Drive. Staff recommends a Condition that all trees facing Collier Canyon Road be at least 24-inch box size to provide an effective transition from surroundings to site buildings (see Conditions of Approval).

All landscaping associated with the project will be maintained by the project's future Homeowners Association (HOA). The proposed trees and shrubs will create a welcoming and comfortable outdoor space and, as conditioned, are consistent with the citywide Design Standards and Guidelines and the Specific Plan.

Fencing, Walls, Public Art, and Signage
There is no fencing proposed on site. The applicant is choosing to pay the Art in Public Places in-lieu fee instead of providing art on site, which is allowed by the Municipal Code.

Signage will be reviewed with building permit plans or later for consistency with the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan all other City regulations, per Conditions of Approval.

Conditional Use Permit CUP24-009
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required of any project that is grading to within 150 feet of the top of the bank of a creek bank per LDC Section 4.02.080.B.3. The proposed minor trail grading would reach the top of the Collier Canyon Creek bank (Attachment 3).

Per the findings in the attached project Resolution, staff recommends approval of CUP24-009.

Consistency Determination
California Government Code Section 65402(a) requires that if a General Plan has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise or sold for public purposes until the location, purpose, and extent of such acquisition or disposition has been shown to be consistent with a local jurisdiction's adopted General Plan. This includes acquiring real property through dedication as proposed by the applicant.

The applicant proposes the real property (in-fee) dedication of Parcel M (2.53-acres) for (a) a public neighborhood park and (b) the south end of the public path along Collier Canyon Creek where it joins Constitution Drive. The applicant would build the park improvements to City required standards. The Livermore Area Recreation and Parks District would maintain the park grounds and improvements.
126
ATTACHMENT 1
19 The Planning Commission is the final decision maker for this Consistency Determination and additional justification can be found in the attached Consistency Determination resolution. Accepting Parcel M for a neighborhood park is consistent with the General Plan through the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan, which designates the south portion of the project site (along Constitution Drive), as the location of a Neighborhood Park/Plaza per INSP Chapter 2, Figure 2-1. Therefore, the proposed dedications are consistent with the General Plan. Upon project approval, staff supports acceptance of the proposed dedication of Parcel M for a public park.

Affordable Housing
The proposed project meets the City's housing affordability requirements as shown below:

INSP Ch. 2, Policy P-LU-33 and corresponding LDC 10.06.050.D.4.c(2), require that: 20% of rental units, or 22 units, be set aside for very-low, low-, median, and moderate-income households, with at least 6% reserved for very-low-income households, 4% reserved for median-income households, and 3% reserved for moderate-income households. Project rental units meet these standards by providing that 108 units to be priced for low-income households or below, and 20% to be priced for very-low income and extremely-low-income households.

INSP Ch. 2, Policy P-LU-33 and corresponding LDC 10.06.050.D.4.c(1) require that 20% or more of for sale units (29-units) being affordable to median- and moderate-income households, with at least 5% of reserved units (8-units) being set aside for median-income households. Permanent provision of low-income units is being provided by the project's rental units that exceed the LDC specified minimum units. Six of the 143, for sale units would be priced to be affordable by moderate-income households. The applicant is not meeting the for-sale requirement but is instead asking for a Density Bonus waiver to concentrate most of its affordable units in the apartment building as explained below.

The City Council has also adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, which establishes citywide affordability requirements that identify performance standards for affordable units (LDC Section 10.06.050.D.7.a-f, 10.06.050.D.8, and 10.06.050.D.9). As required by the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, all affordable units must:

1. Be representative of the project as a whole, with comparable unit type and bedroom mix.

2. Appear the same as the market-rate units.

3. Contain the same average number of bedrooms as market-rate units.

4. Contain the same bathroom to bedroom ratio as market-rate units.

5. Have the same market-rate amenities, like air conditioning and laundry facilities.

6. Meet or exceed the minimum floor areas identified in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (LDC 10.06.050 - Table 10.2).

7. Reflect the overall market-rate product type mix.

8. Be dispersed throughout the project site.
127
ATTACHMENT 1
20 The applicant has requested Density Bonus concessions and waivers from the above standards based on the project becoming infeasible if these standards were applied, based on State of California Housing Crisis Act (Government Code Section 65915) and State Density Bonus law. The State of California Housing Crisis Act is discussed below.

Housing Crisis Act
The Housing Crisis Act (SB 330) became California law on January 1, 2020, and made numerous changes to the procedures for processing, reviewing, and approving housing development projects during the declared statewide housing emergency. The law remains in effect until January 1, 2030, unless extended. Specifically, the new law:
 Created an optional “preliminary application” process for housing developers that freezes development standards and fees as of the submittal date;  Amended the Permit Streamlining Act to clarify the timeframe and procedures for determining whether a development application is complete;  Added provisions to the Housing Accountability Act to ensure only objective standards are used to deny or reduce the density of a housing development project;  Limited the number of hearings that may be held on a housing development project to five; and
 Limits actions to reduce residential development capacity or implement growth control measures and imposes replacement housing and relocation requirements for projects that demolish residential units.

The applicant provided all the necessary information to qualify for relief under the Housing Crisis Act upon initial application submittal on April 20, 2022. Therefore, all development standards and fees applying to the project were vested at that date. The most recent changes made to the INSP as part of the approved Isabel Crossing project are not applicable to the project, as the project was deemed complete prior to the adoption of the amendments. In addition, given that the Specific Plan was adopted after January 1, 2020, all subjective design standards within the plan cannot be used to evaluate the project (but the INSP objective standards can still be used). However, the Specific Plan references the citywide Design Standards and Guidelines, which were adopted prior to January 1, 2020. Therefore, subjective standards from the adopted 2004 citywide Design Standards and Guidelines were still used during project review.

The project review has taken place within the timelines and quantity of hearings specified in the law. No residential demolition nor growth control is part of this project, and the City has terminated its Housing Implementation Program (HIP), which generally limited the annual number of units constructed. For these reasons, the project review process and the review standards used are consistent with the provisions of the Housing Crisis Act.

Density Bonus
The State of California encourages the production of affordable housing through its Density Bonus statute [California Government Code Section 65915-65918]. These 128
ATTACHMENT 1
21 provisions allow projects that contain a certain percentage of low- to extremely-low units to qualify for:
 Density Bonus - no request to exceed the maximum residential density on this parcel has been submitted;
 Waivers of development standards - allows a project to disregard one or more development standards that precludes building to the allowed density. An unlimited number of Waivers may be granted. and
 Developer incentives/concessions - allows this project to disregard up to three development standards if removing the standard would result in quantifiable cost reduction (very similar to a Waiver).

The applicant has requested the following concessions and waivers:

Concessions
The Applicant is entitled to three (3) concessions under the State Density Bonus Law based on the number and affordability of the units proposed in the project which are 108 low, very low, and extremely low-income units, and six (6) moderate income units. The following requirements, if enforced, would make the development of the project as proposed economically infeasible, and thus eligible for a concession under the State Density Bonus Law.

1. Livermore Development Code Section 10.06.050(D)(9): Affordable units to be dispersed throughout the project rather than concentrated in one portion or area of the project. The moderate-income units are dispersed throughout the townhomes. Units that are affordable to households with low-income and below are all in the apartment building.

2. LDC Section 10.06.050(D)(4)(c): Affordable units to be concentrated in rental apartment building instead of dispersed between the rental units and the for sale units.

According to State Density Bonus law, the City shall grant developer Incentives/concessions for affordable housing projects unless one of the following findings can be made [Government Code Section 65915 (d)(1)]:

1. The Concession or Incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions, consistent with subdivision (k), to provide for affordable housing costs, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or for rents for the targeted units to be set as specified in subdivision (c).

Findings: The requested Incentive/ Concession to waive the affordable comparability requirement and concentrate the affordable units as moderate income units in Floor Plan One of the Back-to-Back townhome building types and extremely-, very-, and 129
ATTACHMENT 1
22 low-income units in the apartment building will result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reduction. The applicant has indicated actual costs savings of approximately $2,217,000. This amount represents the estimated additional loss of project revenue that would be the result of providing a representative mix of floorplans as affordable units compared to the units the applicant has proposed to be designated affordable. The units requested by staff also have higher construction costs than the units proposed by the applicant, which is separate category of cost savings. For this reason, overall project costs will be less, and revenues will be more by concentrating the affordable units as moderate-income units in Floor Plan One of the Back-to-Back townhome building types and extremely-, very-, and low-income units in the apartment building, rather than providing affordable units in each floor plan type.

2. The developer incentives would have a specific adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment or an any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to low- and moderate-income households.

Findings: Designating different affordable units would not result in a specific adverse impact upon public health and safety, the physical environment, or any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. Modifying which units are affordable does not impact the physical development or environment and is instead a regulatory action. In addition, all affordable units will still provide for sleeping, restroom, and cooking areas. The for-sale affordable units would have the same amenities as the market rate for-sale units, like laundry and air conditioning, and will be otherwise indistinguishable from the market rate for-sale units, except for their duet type design. All affordable units will be adequately served by water, wastewater, and electrical service. For these reasons, concentrating the affordable units into the Back-to-Back townhome building type with Floor Plan One will not adversely impact the health, safety, or wellbeing of affordable residents. The property is not listed as historic in any local, state or national historical register.

3. The developer incentives would be contrary to State or Federal law.

Findings: Affordability requirements are established by local ordinance. The affordable comparability incentive/concession would not violate any State or Federal law.

Given that none of the findings above can be made, the City is required to grant the requested Incentives/Concessions to the project applicant. In addition, based on correspondence with the California Department of Housing and Community Development, using the Density Bonus to waive Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements is an appropriate use of the law, and furthers the California Legislature's goal to increase the state’s production of market-rate and affordable housing.

Waivers
130
ATTACHMENT 1
23 The Applicant is entitled to unlimited waivers under the State Density Bonus Law based on the number and affordability of the units provided in the proposed project as described in Concessions above. The following requirements, if enforced, would physically preclude the construction of the project as proposed, and thus are eligible for a waiver under the State Density Bonus Law.

1. Citywide Design Standards and Guidelines, Chapter 6, Section D, Design Standard

3.1.2 (CDSG Ch. 6, Sec. D, Standard 3.1.2): "Residential entries shall be located on the front façade and shall directly access the sidewalk or street." Residential entries face internal corridors of the proposed apartment building.

2. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan, Chapter 2, Table 2.2-Development Standards, Private Open Space (INSP, Ch. 2, Table 2.2, Private Open Space): In the Center zone, each unit must have one private open space and 50 sq. ft. min. with a minimum dimension of 4-ft by 8-ft. (50-ft. may be averaged). No apartment units have private open space (e.g. an outdoor patio).

3. Livermore Development Code (LDC) Section 10.06.050(D)(7)(a): Affordable, reserved units to be "representative of the project as a whole" and minimum unit sizes to be per Table 10.2 as summarized below.

No. Bedrooms For Sale
Minimum Size/Proposed
For Rent
Minimum Size/Proposed
Studio 600 s.f. / None proposed 600 s.f. / 411 s.f.
1 750 s.f. / None proposed 750 s.f. / 547 s.f.
2 1,000 s.f. / None proposed 900 s.f. / 791 s.f.
3 1,250 s.f. / Unit 4 (3) = 922
s.f. & Unit 5 (3) = 1,311 s.f.
1,000 s.f. / 1,079 s.f.

The apartment units are physically different from the townhome units. Also, proposed townhome Unit 4 and all apartment studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units do not meet the City's unit size requirement.

4. LDC Section 10.06.050(D)(7)(b): Affordable units [i.e., low-income units and below] shall have air-conditioning, enclosed garages, and laundry facilities to the extent market-priced units have those amenities. Affordable apartment units have less parking (see Parking) and common laundry rooms on each residential floor instead of laundry facilities in each unit.

5. LDC Section 10.06.050(D)(8): The mix of affordable reserved residential units shall reflect the overall mix of market-rate units in the project. The 108, affordable, onestory apartments with studio, 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedroom units do not reflect the 3-story, 3-bedroom townhomes.

6. INSP Chapter 5, Design Standard DS-62 (pg. 5-32): Parking podiums shall not project more than five feet above the level of the sidewalk or grade, whichever is lower, and shall be screened. The top of the proposed parking podium is 17 feet above the 131
ATTACHMENT 1
24 Collier Canyon Road sidewalk. Therefore, the parking podium does not meet the INSP Design Standard.

7. General Plan Scenic Corridor Policy G-LU-2 as implemented in INSP Chapter 2, Tables 2-2, 2-4, and 2-6, that limits building height to 35 feet, 50 feet, or as specified in the General Plan Scenic Corridor Policies for the proposed, five-story apartment building that is 61 feet high to the roof ridgeline, plus an additional nine-foot-high rooftop accessory structures. The proposed townhomes and apartment building height are not consistent with INSP standards as shown in Attachment 3 because they exceed the Scenic Corridor height limitation.

8. LDC Section 10.06.050(D)(7)(c): "The average number of bedrooms for all affordable units in a project shall equal the average number of bedrooms for all other units in the project." All 137-market rate townhome units have a minimum of three bedrooms.

The six affordable townhome units have one to two bedrooms. Twenty-six out of 110 apartment units have three bedrooms (23.6%) - the remaining 84 apartments are studio to 2-bedroom units (76.4%) (per Attachment 3). Therefore, the average number of bedrooms for all affordable units in a project is not equal to the average number of bedrooms for all other units in the project.

9. LDC Section 10.06.050(D)(7)(c): "The number of bathrooms per bedroom shall equal the proportion of bathrooms in the market-priced units." All moderate income townhome units (120% of AMI) have 3.5 bathrooms for 3-bedroom units to 3 bathrooms for 4-bedroom units. All affordable apartments have one bathroom except the 26, 3-bedroom units that have two bathrooms. Therefore, the proportion of bathrooms per bedroom for all affordable units in the project is not equal to the market-priced units in the project.

10.LDC Section 10.06.050(D)(7)(e): "Affordable units shall have air-conditioning, enclosed garages, and laundry facilities to the extent market-priced units have those amenities." Market-priced units are air-conditioned, have enclosed 2-car garages, and each unit is plumbed for a washer and dryer. The affordable apartments are airconditioned; 104 parking spaces are proposed for 110 units consisting of 87 spaces within first-floor podium parking (75 spaces that are stacked one above the other and independently accessible using a mechanical shuffle system and 12 single spaces) and 17 outside spaces; and each residential floor has a common, 13 ft. x 30 ft., laundry room with multiple washers and dryers. Thus, affordable units do not have equivalent parking and laundry facilities.

11.INSP Chapter 2, Table 2-2 (pg. 2-22) requires 50 sq. ft. of Private Open Space per residential unit in the Center zone. The proposed affordable apartments have no private open space, but a private common open space area on the second floor.

Therefore, the proposed apartments lack the total 5,500 sq. ft. of private open space for the apartment units, that is required by Table 2-2. Note that the apartment building is adjacent to a 17,424 sq. ft. pocket park.
132
ATTACHMENT 1
25 The requested waivers would allow construction of the densities and housing affordability envisioned in the Specific Plan and facilitate the City to achieve the General Plan goals for affordable housing.

According to State Density Bonus law, the City shall grant development standard Concessions and Waivers for affordable housing projects that qualify, unless one of the following findings can be made:

1. The waiver or reduction would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health or safety, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.

Findings: The project as proposed and conditioned, incorporates the requested waivers. Staff concluded that the proposed project would not impact public health or safety as part of the recommended reuse of the INSP Environmental Impact Report and this specific project review. Therefore, the proposed waivers would not have a specific, adverse impact upon health or safety.

2. The waiver or reduction would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources.

Findings: The property is not listed on the National Register of Historical Resources, the California Register of Historical Resources, nor on the City of Livermore’s Historical Resources Inventory. Therefore, no historic resources would be materially impaired.

Sustainability
In support of the General Plan, Climate Action Plan, and Specific Plan, the proposed project will incorporate sustainability measures into its construction and operations. For example, all appliances will be powered by electricity (instead of natural gas), spaces within the condominium garages and the apartment podium parking will be Electric Vehicle (EV) ready and capable (providing the necessary wiring and power), allowing residents to more easily use and charge electric vehicles. Garages and trash enclosures will also have sufficient space to accommodate trash, organic, and recycling bins, encouraging composting and recycling activities for all residents. All on-site fixtures would be water and energy efficient.

The project will also efficiently use and treat water onsite. Recycled water will be used for all irrigation and all plants will be medium or low water users. In addition, many species will be natives and pollinators, which are well suited to Livermore’s climate and attract beneficial insects, like bees. Stormwater will be treated in a retention area with natural grasses. The project provides ample pedestrian connections, a Class II bike lane along its frontages, making alternative travel modes more comfortable. The project is also located within 1/4 mile of the LAVTA 30R bus line at Triad Drive and North Canyons Parkway, which serves the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. In addition, the project 133
ATTACHMENT 1
26 is collocated nearby existing job centers. And is within 1/2 mile of the future Valley Link regional rails system that will connect resident in San Joaquin County, the Tri-Valley and the Bay Area. Thus, residents would have walking access to jobs and more efficient forms of transportation, providing more options and potentially reducing their reliance on personal automobiles.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolutions:

1. Approving Consistency Determination 24-010;

2. Recommending the City Council adopt a resolution finding that the project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (c) and that no events described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred and that the project is adequately covered by the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Final and Supplemental EIR;

3. Recommending the City Council adopt a resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 8669 – Subdivision (SUB) 22-006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, and Conditional Use Permit (24-010) subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and

4. Recommending the City Council direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.
134
Staff Report Figures
Figure
Number
Figure Title Page No.
1 Site Aerial Photograph 1
2 Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Land Use [Zoning] Diagram 2 ATTACHMENT 2
135
Figure 1: Site Aerial Photograph
SITE
ATTACHMENT 2
136
Figure 2: Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan
ATTACHMENT 2
137
TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 APPLICANT/OWNER: THE PACIFIC COMPANIES 430 E. State St., Suite 100 Eagle, ID 83616 (208) 461-0022 Contact: Don Slattery [email protected] PROJECT TEAM COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NOVEMBER 15, 2024 RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECT (AFFORDABLE MULTI-FAMILY): AO144 North Orange Street Orange, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 Contact: Ioanna Magiati [email protected] Contact: Victoria Huynh [email protected] SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP CIVIL ENGINEER: CBG CIVIL ENGINEERS 2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 350 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 866-0322 Contact: Ryan Hansen [email protected] G0.0 NORTH N.T.S. PROJECT SITE HWY 580N CANYON PKWY COLLIER CANYON RD PORTOLA AVE AIRWAY BLVD ISABEL AVE GATEWAY AVE CONSTITUTION DR RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECT (TOWNHOMES): SDG ARCHITECTS 3361 Walnut Blvd., Suite 120 Brentwood, CA 94513 (924) 634-7000 Contact: Jeff Potts [email protected] LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: THOMAS H. PHELPS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE P.O. BOX 170129 Boise, ID 83717 (530) 892-8897 Contact: Thomas Phelps [email protected] ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: DC ENGINEERING 440 East Corporate Drive Suite 103 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208) 493-0067 Contact: Josh Farmer [email protected]

ATTACHMENT
3 138
PROJECT INFORMATION G1.0 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 TPC DELVELOPMENT COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA

ATTACHMENT
3 139
NEIGHBORING VIEWS G1.1 LOCATION 4 LOCATION 3 LOCATION 2 LOCATION 1 KEY MAP 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 TPC DELVELOPMENT COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA

ATTACHMENT
3 140

COLLIER CANYON ROAD GATEWAY AVENUE
CONSTITUTION DRIVE COLLIER CREEK 1 2 3 4 56 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 15 14 1617 18 19 20 21 PARCEL A

PARCEL C PARCEL B

PARCEL G

PARCEL H PARCEL I PARCEL D

PARCEL E
PARCEL F PARCEL J PARCEL K PARCEL L 22 PARCEL M PUBLIC PARK AB C DE F F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 1.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' VICINITY MAP SITE TM 1.0 GENERAL NOTES PROPOSED DESCRIPTION LEGEND EXISTING ABBREVIATIONS SHEET INDEX SHEET NO SHEET TITLE LAND USE LAND ACRES PERCENTAGE % PUBLIC PARK PARCEL EXISTING EASEMENT

ATTACHMENT
3 141

COLLIER CANYON ROAD

GATEWAY AVENUE
CONSTITUTION DRIVE COLLIER CREEK F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 2.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS

ATTACHMENT
3 142

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
AROUND
TURN

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 7 BLDG 16 BLDG 17 BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 20 BLDG 21 BLDG 5 BLDG 8 BLDG 9 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 14 BLDG 15 BLDG A GATEWAY

CONSTITUTION DRIVE

F STREET G STREET H STREET B STREET A STREET COLLIER CREEK

C STREET D STREET
E STREET PARCEL M PUBLIC PARK PARCEL J POCKET PARK COLLIER CANYON ROAD A C A B BC A B B A C A B C A CC A C B A AVENUE * * * * * * ** * * ** * * F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 3.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 3.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BLDG 1 LEGEND BUILDING SEPARATION SITE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED PARKING SUMMARY (TOWNHOMES) PROVIDED PARKING SUMMARY (PODIUM) * A

ATTACHMENT
3 143
PUBLIC PARK F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 3.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 3.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SECTIONS TYPICAL A STREET SECTION TYPICAL B STREET SECTION TYPICAL C, D, E, F, & G STREET SECTION TYPICAL H STREET SECTION TYPICAL ALLEY STREET SECTION EXISTING COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION EXISTING CONSTITUTION DRIVE SECTION

ATTACHMENT
3 144

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### GATEWAY AVENUE COLLIER CREEK

CONSTITUTION DRIVE EE COLLIER CANYON ROAD

F STREET G STREET

E STREET H STREET
C STREET D STREET A STREETB STREET AA B B C C D D * * * FF 421.2 P 420.2 * FF 421.5 P 420.5 * * FF 421.8 P 420.8 **FF 422.3 P 421.3 * * FF 423.0 P 422.0 FF 423.6 P 422.6** FF 424.5 P 423.5 * FF 425.1 P 424.1 FF 426.4 P 425.4 FF 425.4 P 424.4 * FF 421.2 P 420.2 FF 421.5 P 420.5 FF 422.1 P 421.1 FF 423.6 P 422.6 FF 423.0 P 422.0 FF 426.1 P 425.1 FF 425.5 P 424.5 FF 424.4 P 423.4 FF 425.0 P 424.0 FF 425.6 P 424.6 FF 427.7 P 426.7 FF 421.6 P 420.6 FF 422.0 P 421.0 FF 423.1 P 422.1 FF 423.5 P 422.5 FF 424.7 P 423.7 FF 425.1 P 424.1 FF 426.2 P 425.2 FF 426.6 P 425.6 FF 426.8 P 425.8 PUBLIC PARK BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 7 BLDG 17BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 21 BLDG 22 BLDG 20 BLDG 5 BLDG 8 BLDG 9 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 15 BLDG 16 BLDG A FF 428.1 F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 4.0.DWG TM 4.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION ABBREVIATIONS ESTIMATED ROUGH GRADING EARTHWORK SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CUT (CY) FILL (CY) NET (CY) SPOILS * F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 4.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40'

ATTACHMENT
3 145

SECTION D-D H STREET (PRIVATE) COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION E-E SECTION A-A COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION B-B PUBLIC PARK SECTION C-C COLLIER CANYON CREEK

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
AROUND
TURN

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### COLLIER CREEK

CONSTITUTION DRIVE COLLIER CANYON ROAD

F STREET G STREET E STREET H STREET
C STREET D STREET A STREET B STREET * * * * * * ** * * ** * * AA B B C C EE D D F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 4.0.DWG TM 4.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING SECTIONS 50' JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 50 100 150 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT
3 146

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING

REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### GATEWAY AVENUE COLLIER CREEK CONSTITUTION DRIVE BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 16 BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 20 BLDG 21 BLDG 5 BLDG 17 BLDG 9 BLDG 8 BLDG 7 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 14 BLDG 15 COLLIER CANYON ROAD

E STREET

F STREET G STREET H STREET
D STREET B STREET A STREET BLDG A C STREET A SECTION A PUBLIC PARK F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 5.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 5.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION

ATTACHMENT
3 147

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### COLLIER CREEK

CONSTITUTION DRIVE C STREET D STREET

E STREET

F STREET G STREET B STREET A STREET COLLIER CANYON ROAD

GATEWAY
AVENUE DMA 1 DMA 2 DMA 3 H STREET DMA 4 DMA 5 DMA 6ADMA 7 DMA 6B BLDG A DETENTION VAULT SECTION BIO-RETENTION AREA DETAIL (BR 2-BR 5) RAISED BIO-RETENTION PLANTER (BR 6A & BR 6B) DMA 1 ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION STORM WATER TREATMENT SUMMARY DMA TOTAL DMA AREA (SF) IMPERVIOUS AREA (SF) PERVIOUS AREA (SF) EFFECTIVE IMPERVIOUS AREA (SF)TREATMENT AREA REQUIRED (SF) 4% TREATMENT AREA PROVIDED (SF) TREATMENT TYPE F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 6.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN TM 6.0

ATTACHMENT
3 148

COLLIER CANYON ROAD

GATEWAY AVENUE COLLIER CREEK

CONSTITUTION DRIVE C STREET D STREET E STREET
F STREET G STREETH STREET B STREET A STREET F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 7.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 7.0

GATEWAY AVENUE PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN LEGEND

ATTACHMENT
3 149

GATEWAY AVENUE

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING
REFUSE

ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE
ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN
BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### COLLIER CANYON ROAD CONSTITUTION DRIVE COLLIER CREEK PUBLIC PARK LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON FIRETRUCK LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON FIRETRUCK BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 7 BLDG 16 BLDG 17 BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 20 BLDG 21 BLDG 5 BLDG 8 BLDG 9 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 14 BLDG 15 BLDG A LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON FIRETRUCK LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON FIRETRUCK LEGEND LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON FIRE TRUCK LIVERMORE PLEASANTON FIRE TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 8.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 8.0 PRELIMINARY FIRE HYDRANT & FIRE ACCESS PLAN

ATTACHMENT
3 150

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING

REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### GATEWAY AVENUE

CONSTITUTION DRIVE COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK

LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK

LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK

LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK PUBLIC PARK
LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK 5-1 6-1 BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 7 BLDG 16 BLDG 17 BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 20 BLDG 21 BLDG 5 BLDG 8 BLDG 9 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 14 BLDG 15 BLDG A 6-2 6-3 6-4 6-5 6-6 6-7 5-2 5-3 5-4 5-5 5-6 35.41 8.074 18.166 4.167 20.25 LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK Overall Length 35.410ft Overall Width 10.500ft Overall Body Height 10.000ft Min Body Ground Clearance 0.751ft Track Width 10.500ft Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual) 30.60° LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK LIVERMORE GARBAGE TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 9.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 9.0 PRELIMINARY TRASH SERVICE PLAN LEGEND TRG TYPICAL TRASH DRIVEWAY DETAIL

ATTACHMENT
3 151

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 17 BLDG 18 BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 20 BLDG 21 BLDG 7 BLDG 16 BLDG 17 BLDG 8 BLDG 9 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 14 BLDG 15 BLDG 5

GATEWAY AVENUE

CONSTITUTION DRIVE COLLIER CANYON ROAD

F STREET G STREET H STREET B STREET A STREET C STREET D STREET E STREET LEGEND RECREATION AREA SUMMARY PARCEL TOTAL PARCEL (AC) OPEN SPACE/PARK (AC) LINEAR PARK/TRAIL (AC) CONSERVATION EASEMENT (AC) EXISTING EASEMENTS (AC) OPEN SPACE AREA (AC) F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 10.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' PRELIMINARY OPEN SPACE PLANTM 10.0

ATTACHMENT
3 152

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING

REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x########### GATEWAY AVENUE COLLIER CREEK CONSTITUTION DRIVE BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 6 BLDG 16 BLDG 18 BLDG 19 BLDG 20 BLDG 21 BLDG 5 BLDG 17 BLDG 9 BLDG 8 BLDG 7 BLDG 10 BLDG 11 BLDG 12 BLDG 13 BLDG 14 BLDG 15 COLLIER CANYON ROAD

F STREET

E STREET G STREET H STREET
D STREET B STREET A STREET BLDG A C STREET F:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 11.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 11.0 MAINTENANCE DESIGNATION PLAN NOTES: LEGEND OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY TABLE ITEM OWNERSHIP/MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY

ATTACHMENT
3 153
COLLIER CANYON ROAD AA BB CC CONSTITUTION DRIVE HIGHWAY 580 PUBLIC PARK HIGHWAY 580 X PUBLIC PARK HIGHWAY 580 X HIGHWAY 580 X ROOM
PUMP
FIRE
TURN

AROUND GENERATOR

ROOM COLLIER CANYON ROAD

GATEWAY AVENUE

A STREET

A STREET
CONSTITUTION DRIVEDD EE GG FF COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION D-D CONSTITUTION DRIVE SECTION A-A CONSTITUTION DRIVE SECTION B-B CONSTITUTION DRIVE SECTION C-C COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION E-E COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION F-F COLLIER CANYON ROAD SECTION G-G CONCEPTUAL PLAN LINE STUDYF:\3181-000\ACAD\TM\TM 12.0.DWG JOB NO.: 3181-000 SCALE: 1" = DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2024 0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 14 TRACT 8669 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CORNERSTONE CITY OF LIVERMORE ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 40' TM 12.0

ATTACHMENT
3 154
ATTACHMENT 3
155

WALK-IN
CLOSET
BATH 2 PRIMARY

BATH LINEN

DN PRIMARY

BEDROOM
12'-7" x 12'-2"
BEDROOM 2
9'-11" x 12'-1" BEDROOM 3
9'-11" x 12'-8"
DN
UP

KITCHEN

PANTRY PWDR
DECK
12'-0" x 6'-0" FAMILY
14'-3" x 15'-2" DINING
13'-5" x 8'-6" LNDY
6'-0" x 5'-7" 34'-0"
20'-8" 6'-0"
ENTRY
UP 3'-0"
LINE OF 20' x 20' CLEAR GARAGE

SPACE WATER HEATER

TRASH BIKE STORAGE ORGANICS RECYCLING
220 VOLT 40 AMP WIRING
LOCATION T.B.D.

CONC. A/C PAD
(SCREENED)
2-CAR GARAGE
20'-1" x 21'-9" FLEX
16'-2" x 11'-2" PORCH
12'-0" x 6'-0" UNIT 1 FLOOR PLANS
A1
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8' UNIT 1 SQUARE FOOTAGE

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
2-CAR GARAGE
PORCH
DECK
244 SQ. FT. 758 SQ. FT. 724 SQ. FT. 1726 SQ. FT. 459 SQ. FT. 78 SQ. FT. 72 SQ. FT. Trumark Homes 3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024

THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
156
BATH 2 LINEN PRIMARY
BATH

WALK-IN
CLOSET
DN
BEDROOM 2
10'-1" x 10'-6" BEDROOM 3
10'-1" x 10'-3"

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
11'-0" x 12'-6"
LNDY
5'-6" x 6'-0" DN
UP

KITCHEN
PWDR
PANTRY
FAMILY
14'-2" x 19'-10" DINING
14'-2" x 9'-0"
DECK
7'-9" x 6'-0" 37'-0"
21'-1" 3'-0"
ENTRY
UP BATH 3 2'-0"
LINE OF 20' x 20' CLEAR GARAGE

SPACE WATER HEATER BIKE STORAGETRASH ORGANICS RECYCLING 220 VOLT 40 AMP WIRING
LOCATION T.B.D.

CONC. A/C PAD
(SCREENED) PORCH
7'-9" x 6'-0"
2-CAR GARAGE
20'-6" x 19'-10"BEDROOM 4
11'-0" x 10'-10" 6'-0"
UNIT 2 FLOOR PLANS
A2
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 UNIT 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
2-CAR GARAGE
PORCH
DECK
288 SQ. FT. 794 SQ. FT. 762 SQ. FT. 1844 SQ. FT. 464 SQ. FT. 56 SQ. FT. 53 SQ. FT. THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN ATTACHMENT 3
157
DN
UP

KITCHEN
PWDR
PANTRY
DEN
21'-0" x 6'-0" FAMILY
16'-1" x 12'-6"DINING
17'-7" x 9'-5"
LNDY
5'-6" x 6'-0" 34'-0"
23'-5" 6'-0"
ENTRY BATH 3 3'-0"
UP
LINE OF 20' x 20' CLEAR GARAGE

SPACE WATER

HEATER BIKE STORAGE ORGANICS TRASH

RECYCLING
220 VOLT 40 AMP WIRING
LOCATION T.B.D.

CONC. A/C PAD
(SCREENED)
2-CAR GARAGE
22'-10" x 21'-3" BEDROOM 4
10'-1" x 10'-6" PORCH
21'-0" x 6'-0"
BATH 2 LINEN PRIMARY
BATH

WALK-IN
CLOSET
DN
BEDROOM 2
10'-5" x 11'-5" BEDROOM 3
12'-1" x 10'-5"

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
14'-1" x 13'-2" UNIT 3 FLOOR PLANS
A3
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 UNIT 3 SQUARE FOOTAGE

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
2-CAR GARAGE
PORCH
DECK
297 SQ. FT. 868 SQ. FT. 839 SQ. FT. 2004 SQ. FT. 499 SQ. FT. 126 SQ. FT. 126 SQ. FT. THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN ATTACHMENT 3
158
DN
DN

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
13'-4" x 11'-11"

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
11'-9" x 17'-1" BEDROOM 2
10'-1" x 10'-3" PRIMARY
BATH
BA 2

PRIMARY
BATH
LNDY

LNDY WALK-IN
CLOSET

WALK-IN
CLOSET

LINEN LINEN
DN
DN UP

UP PWDR

LINEN PANTRY KITCHEN FAMILY
13'-8" x 13'-1"

KITCHEN
FAMILY
11'-5" x 11'-1" DECK
10'-9" x 6'-0"
DECK
6'-1" x 13'-5" TECH
6'-5" x 10'-6" 11'-9"
23'-7" 25'-1"
2-CAR GARAGE
20'-1" x 20'-2"
1-CAR GARAGE
20'-1" x 11'-1" PWDR ENTRY ENTRY
PORCH
6'-1" x 13'-5" PORCH
10'-9" x 6'-0"
UP UP
4'-7 1/4" 2'-0" 6'-1 1/4" 1'-0" 2'-8 1/2"
CONC. A/C PAD
(SCREENED)
TRASH
TRASH

BIKE STORAGE BIKE STORAGE

ORGANICS RECYCLING

RECYCLING ORGANICS
220 VOLT 40 AMP WIRING
LOCATION T.B.D. WATER HEATER

WATER HEATER
(AFFORDABLE UNITS) UNIT RT 4_5 FLOOR PLANS
A4
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8' UNIT 5 SQUARE FOOTAGE

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
2-CAR GARAGE
PORCH
DECK
119 SQ. FT. 593 SQ. FT. 599 SQ. FT. 1311 SQ. FT. 468 SQ. FT. 65 SQ. FT. 64 SQ. FT. Trumark Homes 3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024

THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
UNIT 4 SQUARE FOOTAGE

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
1-CAR GARAGE
PORCH
DECK
115 SQ. FT. 430 SQ. FT. 377 SQ. FT. 922 SQ. FT. 274 SQ. FT. 80 SQ. FT. 83 SQ. FT.

ATTACHMENT 3
159
(STANDARD) UNIT 2
(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 3 89'-3" 40'-0"
(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2
ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 9'-7 3/4" 6'-0"6'-0" 3'-4 1/2"
3'-0" 3'-0" A/C PAD, TYP.
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2

ALL ROOF SLOPES
TO BE 4:12 U.O.N
1'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6" TYP. EAVE TYP. EAVE U.O.N. 1'-0" TYP. RAKE 1'-6" TYP. RAKE1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" (STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3

CRAFTSMAN -
4 UNIT BUILDING FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A5
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' THIRD FLOOR PLAN
Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
160
ATTACHMENT 3
161
ATTACHMENT 3
162
(STANDARD) UNIT 2
(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3
131'-2" 40'-0"
(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 2
ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 9'-7 3/4" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 6'-0" 4'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" A/C PAD, TYP. (STANDARD) UNIT 3(REVERSE) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2 W D
6 UNIT BUILDING FLOOR PLANS
A7
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
163
(STANDARD) UNIT 3
(REVERSE) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 8'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0"

ALL ROOF SLOPES
TO BE 6:12 U.O.N 5 :12
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 3 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 1'-6" TYP. EAVE 1'-6" TYP. RAKE 1'-0" 1'-0" TYP. EAVE
1'-0" TYP. RAKE
1'-0"
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12 FARMHOUSE -
6 UNIT BUILDING THIRD FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A8
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 THIRD FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
164
ATTACHMENT 3
165
ATTACHMENT 3
166
ATTACHMENT 3
167
ATTACHMENT 3
168
ATTACHMENT 3
169
ATTACHMENT 3
170
151'-11" 40'-0"
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 2 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 9'-7 3/4" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 6'-0" 4'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" A/C PAD, TYP. (REVERSE) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 3(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2 7 UNIT BUILDING FLOOR PLANS
A12 0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
171
(REVERSE) UNIT 2
(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 8'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-4 1/2"

ALL ROOF SLOPES
TO BE 5:12 U.O.N 6 :12
(REVERSE) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1 1'-6" 1'-6" TYP. EAVE TYP. EAVE
1'-0" TYP. RAKE
6 :12 6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12 6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :126 :12 6 :126 :12 6 :126 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 6 :12

REGENCY -
7 UNIT BUILDING THIRD FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A13
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 THIRD FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
172
ATTACHMENT 3
173
ATTACHMENT 3
174
ATTACHMENT 3
175
ATTACHMENT 3
176
ATTACHMENT 3
177
ATTACHMENT 3
178
173'-1" 40'-0"
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2 6'-0" 9'-7 3/4" 3'-0" A/C PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 6'-0" 4'-4 1/2" 3'-0" LADDER PAD, TYP.

ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. (STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 3(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2 8 UNIT BUILDING FLOOR PLANS
A17 0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
179
(STANDARD) UNIT 2
(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 8'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-4 1/2" (STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2

ALL ROOF SLOPES
TO BE 4:12 U.O.N
1'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6" TYP. EAVE
1'-0" TYP. RAKE 1'-6" TYP. RAKE
1'-0" 1'-0" TYP. EAVE 1'-6"

CRAFTSMAN -
8 UNIT BUILDING THIRD FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A18
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 THIRD FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
180
ATTACHMENT 3
181
ATTACHMENT 3
182
152'-1" 40'-0"
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 4_5(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 2 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 9'-7 3/4" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 6'-0" 4'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" A/C PAD, TYP. (REVERSE) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 3(REVERSE) UNIT 4_5(STANDARD) UNIT 2 8 UNIT ALT BUILDING FLOOR PLANS
A20 0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
183
(REVERSE) UNIT 2
(REVERSE) UNIT 4_5(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 8'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-4 1/2"

ALL ROOF SLOPES
TO BE 5:12 U.O.N
(REVERSE) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 4_5(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1 1'-6" 1'-6" TYP. EAVE TYP. EAVE
1'-0" TYP. RAKE
1'-6"
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :126 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :126 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :126 :12 6 :12 6 :12 REGENCY -
8 UNIT ALT BUILDING THIRD FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A21
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 THIRD FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
184
ATTACHMENT 3
185
ATTACHMENT 3
186
ATTACHMENT 3
187
ATTACHMENT 3
188
ATTACHMENT 3
189
ATTACHMENT 3
190
194'-3" 40'-0"
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 9'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 6'-0" 4'-4 1/2" 3'-0" A/C PAD, TYP. (STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 3(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2 9 UNIT BUILDING FLOOR PLANS
A25 0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
191
(STANDARD) UNIT 2
(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 3(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2 ROADWAY - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D. NO BEDROOMS - NO LADDER PADS REQ'D.

LADDER
PAD, TYP. 6'-0" 8'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-4 1/2" 3'-0" (STANDARD) UNIT 2(REVERSE) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 3(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 1(STANDARD) UNIT 2(STANDARD) UNIT 2

ALL ROOF SLOPES
TO BE 6:12 U.O.N 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 1'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6" TYP. EAVE 1'-0" TYP. RAKE 1'-6" TYP. RAKE 1'-0" TYP. EAVE 1'-6" 1'-0" 5 :12 8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12
8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 8 :12 FARMHOUSE -
9 UNIT BUILDING THIRD FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A26
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16' Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 THIRD FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
ATTACHMENT 3
192
ATTACHMENT 3
193
ATTACHMENT 3
194
ATTACHMENT 3
195
ATTACHMENT 3
196
9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"

KITCHEN FAMILY

BEDROOM

PRIMARY
BATH

GARAGE ENTRY
BATH
PORCH

FAMILY KITCHEN

BEDROOM

PRIMARY
BATH

ENTRY GARAGE
BATH
PORCH

FAMILY KITCHEN

BEDROOM

PRIMARY
BATH

ENTRY GARAGE
BATH
PORCH +/- 30'-0"
40'-1" BLDG 124'-0" 26'-0" 4'-0" 40'-1" BLDG 1115'-0" 40'-1" BLDG 10 T.O. PL T.O. SF. T.O. PL T.O. SF. T.O. PL T.O. CURB F STREET E STREET PASEO Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 SITE SECTION
A29

SITE SECTION
0 2' 4' 6' 8' 16'
ATTACHMENT 3
197
T.O. PL T.O.S.

T.O. SF.

T.O. PL T.O. SF. 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 6' TYPICAL SLIP RESISTANT LADDER PAD

SURFACE
T.O. PL +/- 23'-9" +/- 30'-0"
75°
1 T.O. PL T.O. CURB
T.O. SF.

T.O. PL T.O. SF. 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
75°
T.O. PL +/- 30'-0" +/- 23'-11" SLIP RESISTANT LADDER PAD

SURFACE (ROADWAY
SURFACE) 2
75° 6' TYPICAL SLIP RESISTANT LADDER PAD
SURFACE 30'-0" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 23'-9 1/4"
3 T.O. PL T.O.S.

T.O. SF.

T.O. PL T.O. SF.

T.O. PL
75° T.O. CURB +/- 23'-11" SLIP RESISTANT LADDER PAD

SURFACE (ROADWAY
SURFACE)29'-11 9/16" (EAVE HT.) 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
4 T.O. PL T.O. SF.

T.O. PL T.O. SF.

T.O. PL
Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 TYPICAL LADDER PAD SECTIONS
A30
ATTACHMENT 3
198
T.O. PL T.O.S.

T.O. SF.

T.O. PL T.O. SF. 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 6' TYPICAL SLIP RESISTANT LADDER PAD

SURFACE
T.O. PL +/- 30'-0" +/- 19'-10"
5 75° T.O. CURB 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 29'-11 9/16" (EAVE HT.) 6 T.O. PL T.O. SF.

T.O. PL T.O. SF.

T.O. PL
75° 23'-11 1/4" SLIP RESISTANT LADDER PAD

SURFACE (ROADWAY
SURFACE) Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 TYPICAL LADDER PAD SECTIONS
A31
ATTACHMENT 3
199
ATTACHMENT 3
200
ATTACHMENT 3
201
ATTACHMENT 3
202
ATTACHMENT 3
203
Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 TYPICAL FARMHOUSE DETAILS
A36

STUCCO WINDOW SILL

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM SCALE: 3"=1'-0" FIBER CEMENT SIDING

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW SILL SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
STUCCO WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" STUCCO

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM SCALE: FIBER CEMENT SIDING

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
3"=1'-0"

PAINTED GSM

FLASHING

EXTERIOR FINISH
2x8 RAKE
BOARD

ROOF TRUSS COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOFING
2x4 FLAT FRAMING @ 24" O.C. - PAINT TO MATCH EXTERIOR
FINISH COLOR TYPICAL RAKE SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
VARIES
12"-18"
2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM
2x4 FLAT o/ 2X4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 FLAT o/ 2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM
2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x6 FOAM TRIM WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0" 2x6 SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT VERT. TRIM WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0" VINYL WINDOW FRAME

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING

EXTERIOR FINISH
ROOF
TRUSS TYPICAL EAVE SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
2x CONT. BLOCKING
7" PROFILE GUTTER
2x8 RAKE BOARD
BEYOND
18" TYP.

AC SCREEN SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" AS REQ'D PAINT TO MATCH

ADJACENT BUILDING
ATTACHMENT 3
204
Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 TYPICAL CRAFTSMAN DETAILS
A37

STUCCO WINDOW SILL

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" WINDOW SILL SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
STUCCO WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" STUCCO
VINYL WINDOW FRAME WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM SCALE: FIBER CEMENT SIDING

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
3"=1'-0" WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM SCALE: 3"=1'-0" FIBER CEMENT SIDING

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
STUCCO WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" PAINTED GSM

FLASHING

EXTERIOR FINISH
2x8 RAKE
BOARD

ROOF TRUSS COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOFING
2x4 FLAT FRAMING @ 24" O.C. - PAINT TO MATCH EXTERIOR
FINISH COLOR TYPICAL RAKE SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
VARIES
12"-18"
2x4 FLAT o/ 2x4 SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT HORZ. TRIM
2x4 FLAT o/ 2X4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 FLAT o/ 2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM
2x4 FLAT
o/ 2X4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x6 FOAM TRIM WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0" 2x6 SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT VERT. TRIM WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0" VINYL WINDOW FRAME

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING

EXTERIOR FINISH
ROOF
TRUSS TYPICAL EAVE SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
2x CONT. BLOCKING
7" PROFILE GUTTER
2x8 RAKE BOARD
BEYOND
18" TYP. AC SCREEN SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" AS REQ'D PAINT TO MATCH

ADJACENT BUILDING
ATTACHMENT 3
205
Trumark Homes
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA
925.648.8300 373.023 Cornerstone
Livermore, CA
September 11, 2024 TYPICAL REGENCY DETAILS
A38
WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM SCALE: 3"=1'-0" FIBER CEMENT SIDING

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW SILL SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
STUCCO WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" STUCCO
VINYL WINDOW FRAME WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM SCALE: FIBER CEMENT SIDING

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
3"=1'-0" PAINTED GSM

FLASHING

EXTERIOR FINISH
2x8 RAKE
BOARD

ROOF TRUSS COMPOSITION

SHINGLE ROOFING
2x4 FLAT FRAMING @ 24" O.C. - PAINT TO MATCH EXTERIOR
FINISH COLOR TYPICAL RAKE SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
12" TYP.
2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM
2x4 FLAT o/ 2X4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 FOAM TRIM
2x4 FLAT o/ 2x4 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT HORZ. TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x6 FOAM TRIM WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0"
2x6 SMOOTH FIBER
CEMENT VERT. TRIM WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0" VINYL WINDOW FRAME COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING

EXTERIOR FINISH
ROOF
TRUSS TYPICAL EAVE SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
2x CONT. BLOCKING
7" PROFILE GUTTER
2x8 RAKE BOARD
BEYOND
18" TYP. AC SCREEN SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" AS REQ'D PAINT TO MATCH

ADJACENT BUILDING
ATTACHMENT 3
206
ATTACHMENT 3
207
9'-0"
FILE
FILE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE BIKE RACK DD06-LL-G 6 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE ENTRY MAINTENANCE ROOM LOBBY UPDN FILE/ STORAGE LEASING OFFICE T FIRE PUMP ROOM ELEV RM 75 STACKER STALLS 12 STANDARD STALLS UPDN BOILER TRASH COLLECTION UPDN MAIL ROOM 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 ELELMPOE 10T 2P 4C16D-20 TURN AROUND TURN AROUND TURN
AROUND TURN AROUND PARCEL ROOM 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELECTRICAL ROOM GENERATOR ROOM ELECTRICAL ROOM

VAN GATEWAY AVENUE H STREET G STREET COLLIER CANYON ROAD T T USPS TRASH STAGING / MOVE-IN 17 STALLS 7'-11" 6'-0" 15'-0" 20'-0" 319'-8" 10'-0" 12'-11"30'-0"47'-7" 41'-6" 64'-1" 11'-7" 26'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 6'-8" 49'-4" 47'-2" RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 9'-0" 12'-0" 5'-0" 9'-6" 19'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" 18'-0" T VAN 9'-6" 5'-0" 9'-6" 8'-10" 8'-10"26'-3" PER MANUFACTURER 19'-1" PER MANUFACTURER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN B1.0 1"=30'-0"0 15' 30' 60' 90' NORTH REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE EXHIBITS FOR MORE INFORMATION PROJECT DATA TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 LEGENDSTANDARD ADA PARKING STALL 3-WIDE 2-TIER PARKING STACKER SYSTEM PER MANUFACTURER STANDARD PARKING STALL ADA VAN PARKING STALL NOTE: AS THIS IS AN AFFORDABLE PROJECT, NO ELECTRIC VEHICLE IS REQUIRED PER CITY OF LIVERMORE AMENDMENT GSBC 4.106.4 EXCEPTION 1.2. VAN

ATTACHMENT
3 208
9'-0"
FILE
FILE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE BIKE RACK DD06-LL-G 6 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE ENTRY MAINTENANCE ROOM LOBBY UPDN FILE/ STORAGE LEASING OFFICE T FIRE PUMP ROOM ELEV RM 75 STACKER STALLS 12 STALLS UPDN BOILER TRASH COLLECTION UPDN MAIL ROOM 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 ELELMPOE 10T 2P 4C16D-20 TURN AROUND TURN AROUND TURN
AROUND TURN AROUND PARCEL ROOM 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELECTRICAL ROOM GENERATOR ROOM EVCS
VAN
EVCS

VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
EVCS
VAN
EVCS
VAN

EVR EVR

EVR EVR EVR EVR EVR
EVR

EVR GATEWAY AVENUE H STREET COLLIER CANYON ROAD T T

USPS TRASH STAGING / MOVE-IN
EVCS
VAN 17 STALLS 7'-11" 6'-0" 15'-0" 20'-0" 319'-8" 10'-0" 12'-11"30'-0"47'-7" 41'-6" 64'-1" 11'-7" 26'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 6'-8" 49'-4" 47'-2" RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 9'-0" 9'-6" 5'-0" 9'-6" 9'-6" 12'-0" 19'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0"5'-0" 5'-0"

PER MANUFACTURER
18'-0"
EVR EVR EVR EVR EVR EVR EVR 5'-0" T EVCS

EVR EVR

EVR EVR
EVR
EVR EVR EVCS AERIAL APPARATUS ACCESS 150'-0"

AERIAL APPARATUS ACCESS GE
139'-6" 41'-8" R20'-1" R30'-0" 150'-0" GE OUTDOOR AMENITY 735 SF S1 ABOVE UPDN UPDN C1 ABOVE PASSAGEWAY COMMUNITY SPACE
PASSAGEWAY B2 S1 S1 LAUNDRY ROOM S1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 C1 C1C1C1C1 S1S1 C1 B1B1 B1 B1 B1S1 S1 JANITOR / 5' DIA. STORAGE
30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. UPDN LIVING
12'-6" X 12'-8" BEDROOM 1
10'-8" X 9'-10" BEDROOM 2
10'-8" X 9'-10" P. L. CHASE
33" X 30" BATH

KITCHEN
DW B2
LIVING
12'-6" X 12'-8" BEDROOM 1
10'-8" X 9'-10" BEDROOM 2
10'-8" X 9'-10" P. L. CHASE
33" X 30" BATH

KITCHEN
DW IDF ELEC BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE (4) BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE (4) BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES ELEL OUTDOOR AMENITY BICYCLE STORAGE (4) T GEGE CONCEPTUAL FIRE PLAN B1.1 1"=10'-0"0 5' 10' 20' 30' PROJECT DATA TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 LEGENDAERIAL TRUCK LADDER ACCESS TO BLDG 150' HOSE PULL GE GURNEY-SIZE ELEVATOR EXIT STAIRWELL WITH ROOF ACCESS RESIDENTIAL AERIAL APPARATUS ACCESS FIRE ACCESS APPARATUS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SUB-KEYED KNOX BOX WITH 3-SETS OF ENTRY DOOR/GATE KEYS, SUB-KEYED KNOX KEY SWITCH OR KNOX PADLOCK FIRE LANE FIRE AREA SEPARATION WALL MAIN ACCESS POINT TO BUILDING EXIT STAIRWELL PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT SECOND-FIFTH LEVEL FIRST LEVEL NORTH REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE EXHIBITS FOR MORE INFORMATION

ATTACHMENT
3 209
OUTDOOR AMENITY 735 SF S1 ABOVE UPDN
UPDN C1 ABOVE PASSAGEWAY RESIDENT SUPPORT SERVICES/ COMMUNITY SPACE PASSAGEWAY B2 S1 S1 LAUNDRY ROOM S1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 C1 C1C1C1C1 S1S1 C1 B1B1 B1 B1 B1S1 S1 JANITOR / 5' DIA. STORAGE
30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 6'-6"6'-6" UPDN B2 IDF ELEC BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE (4) BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE (4) BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES ELEL OUTDOOR AMENITY 296'-5" 72'-0" 72'-0" 10'-2" 56'-0" 7'-0" 10'-2" 100'-2" 172'-2" 100'-11"
23'-3" BICYCLE STORAGE (4) 2'-0" T
FILE
FILE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE BIKE RACK DD06-LL-G 6 BIKES BICYCLE STORAGE ENTRY MAINTENANCE ROOM LOBBY UPDN 6'-6"6'-6" FILE/ STORAGE LEASING OFFICE T FIRE PUMP ROOM ELEV RM 75 STACKER STALLS 12 STANDARD STALLS UPDN BOILER TRASH COLLECTION UPDN MAIL ROOM 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 ELELMPOE 10T 2P 4C16D-20 TURN AROUND TURN AROUND TURN
AROUND TURN AROUND PARCEL ROOM 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELECTRICAL ROOM GENERATOR ROOM 19'-5" 45'-5" 319'-8" 64'-9"
63'-0" 106'-10" 105'-8" 170'-6" ELECTRICAL ROOM
VAN TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 CONCEPTUAL BUILDING PLANS B2.0 1"=10'-0"0 5' 10' 20' 30' FIRST LEVEL NORTH SECOND LEVEL LEGENDPARKING / BACK-OF-HOUSE AREA RESIDENTIAL COMMON SPACE PARKING STALL - ADA PARKING STALL - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION EVCS EVR EVC PARKING STALL - ELECTRIC VEHICLE READY PARKING STALL - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CAPABLE

ATTACHMENT
3 210
B2 S1 S1 S1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 C1 C1C1C1C1 S1S1 C1 B1B1 B1 B1 B1S1 S1 MANAGER'S B2 UNIT @ LEVEL 5 C1 S1 LAUNDRY ROOM JANITOR IDF ELEC MANAGER'S UNIT @ LEVEL 5 UPDN UPDN
5' DIA. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 30 48 SIDE APPROACH +54" MAX. A.F.S. 6'-6"6'-6" UPDN ELEL BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKESBIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G 4 BIKES 296'-5" 72'-0" 72'-0"
56'-0" 7'-0" 10'-2" 10'-2" 100'-2" 172'-2"100'-11" BICYCLE STORAGE (4) BICYCLE STORAGE (4) BICYCLE STORAGE (4) 2'-0" TRASH CHUTE UPDN FLAT ROOF ELEVATOR OVERRUN ±8'-0"
SLOPE STAIRCASE ±10'-0" STAIRCASE OVERRUN FOR MASSING ONLY ±10'-0" SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE FLAT ROOF SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE FLAT ROOF STAIRCASE OVERRUN FOR MASSING ONLY ±10'-0" 296'-5" 72'-0"
56'-0" 172'-2" 100'-11" ±2'-0" TO ±4'-0" TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 CONCEPTUAL BUILDING PLANS B2.1 1"=10'-0"0 5' 10' 20' 30' NORTH THIRD-FIFTH LEVEL LEGENDPARKING / BACK-OF-HOUSE AREA RESIDENTIAL COMMON SPACE ROOF LEVEL PARKING STALL - ADA PARKING STALL - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION EVCS EVR EVC PARKING STALL - ELECTRIC VEHICLE READY PARKING STALL - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CAPABLE

ATTACHMENT
3 211
GEAR WALL CHASE 75" X 18" LIVING SPACE 12'-8" X 15'-9" KITCHEN BATH UNIT S1 STUDIO - 1 BATH UNIT AREA: 411 SQ. FT. P. LIVING 10'-8" X 9'-4" KITCHEN P. CHASE 33" X 18" DW BEDROOM 1 10'-8" X 11'-6" CHASE 33" X 30" BATH UNIT A1 1 BED - 1 BATH UNIT AREA: 547 SQ. FT. KITCHEN P. CHASE 42" X 18" DW CHASE 33" X 26" LIVING / DINING 12'-8" X 16'-4" BEDROOM 1 10'-8" X 9'-6" BEDROOM 2 10'-8" X 9'-9" BATH UNIT B1 2 BED - 1 BATH UNIT AREA: 791 SQ. FT. KITCHEN P. CHASE 33" X 18" DW CHASE 33" X 26" LIVING / DINING 12'-8" X 16'-4" BEDROOM 1 10'-8" X 10'-0" BEDROOM 2 10'-8" X 10'-0" BEDROOM 3 10'-8" X 11'-6" CHASE 33" X 30" BATH BATH UTILITY SPACE OR STORAGE 10'-8" X 5'-8" 60 SQ. FT. UNIT C1 3 BED - 2 BATH UNIT AREA: 1079 SQ. FT. TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 CONCEPTUAL UNIT PLANS B3.0 1/4"=1'-0"0 2' 4' 8' 12'

ATTACHMENT
3 212
17'-2" LEVEL 1 (+0'-0") LEVEL 2 (+17'-5") TOP OF STAIR
61'-11" 10'-11" LEVEL 3 (+28'-4") 10'-11" LEVEL 4 (+39'-3") 10'-11" LEVEL 5 (+50'-2") 11'-11" ROOF (+61'-1") ±70'-9" 17'-2" LEVEL 1 (+0'-0") LEVEL 2 (+17'-5") TOP OF STAIR
61'-11" 10'-11" LEVEL 3 (+28'-4") 10'-11" LEVEL 4 (+39'-3") 10'-11" LEVEL 5 (+50'-2") 11'-11" ROOF (+61'-1") ±70'-9" 17'-2" LEVEL 1 (+0'-0") LEVEL 2 (+17'-5") TOP OF STAIR
61'-11" 10'-11" LEVEL 3 (+28'-4") 10'-11" LEVEL 4 (+39'-3") 10'-11" LEVEL 5 (+50'-2") 11'-11" ROOF (+61'-1") ±70'-9" 17'-2" LEVEL 1 (+0'-0") LEVEL 2 (+17'-5") ±70'-9" TOP OF STAIR 61'-11" 10'-11" LEVEL 3 (+28'-4") 10'-11" LEVEL 4 (+39'-3") 10'-11" LEVEL 5 (+50'-2") 11'-11" ROOF (+61'-1") KEY MAP NORTH N.T.S. COLLIER CANYON ROAD TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 CONCEPTUAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS B4.0 1"=20'-0"0 10' 20' 40' 60' 3 4 1 2 NORTH ELEVATION 3 EAST ELEVATION 1 WEST ELEVATION 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 2

ATTACHMENT
3 213
PROPOSED BUILDING COLLIER RD PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT - TOP OF ROOF (+61'-1") H STREET PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT - TOP OF ROOF (+61'-1") TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 CONCEPTUAL SITE SECTIONS B5.0 1"=20'-0"0 10' 20' 40' 60' SECTION A SECTION B KEY MAP NORTH N.T.S. COLLIER CANYON ROAD A B A B

ATTACHMENT
3 214
VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER 4 VIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF COLLIER CANYON RD 2 TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 VIEW FROM COLLIER CANYON RD AND GATEWAY AVE 1 KEY MAP NORTH N.T.S. COLLIER CANYON ROAD 2 3 4 1 VIEW FROM NORTHWEST CORNER 3 CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS B6.0

ATTACHMENT
3 215
CONCEPTUAL 3D VIEWS B6.1 TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 VIEW FROM COLLIER CANYON RD AND GATEWAY AVE 1 KEY MAP NORTH N.T.S. COLLIER CANYON ROAD 2 1 AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER 2

ATTACHMENT
3 216
CONCEPTUAL MATERIAL AND COLOR BOARD B7.0 TPC DELVELOPMENT 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 (714) 639-9860 AO ARCHITECTS COLLIER CANYON ROAD LIVERMORE, CA DATE: 11/15/2024 JOB NO.: 2020-432 A. SW 6253 OLYMPUS WHITE E. SW 7040 SMOKEHOUSE C. SW 7068 GRIZZLE GRAY 1. STUCCO LIGHT SAND FINISH 4. VINYL STOREFRONT WINDOW 5. VINYL WINDOWS SYSTEM DARK BRONZE OR EQUAL F1 D. SW 7069 IRON ORE 2. FIBER CEMENT SMOOTH VERTICAL PANEL E1 C2 E1 B2 D1 F. SW 7048 URBANE BRONSE 6. METAL AWNING E1 D 1 1 5 F E1 E1 E1 D1 C1 A1 A2 B2 3. FIBER CEMENT STONE IMMITATION PANELS D 7 1 A1 B 3 2 C2 4 A2 E1 B. SW 7659 GRIS 2B C2 4 E1 A1 2 E B 1 E1 3 E1 A1 7. ROOFING SHINGLES C2 B2 B2 F2 A2 6 7 A1 A1 2 A B 1 3 E1 B2 7 E 3 1 E1 D1

ATTACHMENT
3 217

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING

REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE
36" D-ISLAND
42"x24" RETURN SHELL
- REVERSIBLE 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DD06-LL-G

BIKE RACK
6 BIKES STORAGE

BICYCLE HCEL
60" DIAMETER CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM
75 STACKER
STALLS
12 STALLS UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 ELEL
MPOE
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN
TURN
AROUND

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN EVCS VAN ELECTRICAL ROOM
###########x########### ###########x###########
UPDN UPDN 5' DIA. DN
UP
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PLANL1 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0SCALE: 50 100 150 feet 1"=50' NORTH PARK AREA A. FUTSAL COURT - 20 METERS X 40 METERS WITH PERIMETER FENCE B. TURF PLAY AREA / STORM WATER DETENTION C. CONCRETE WALK WAY AND RECREATION AREA D. PICNIC AREA WITH TABLES AND SHADE STRUCTURE E. PLAYGROUND AREA FOR 3-5 AND 5-12 YEAR OLD USERS F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN G. 4' wide decomposed graite path PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL AREA H. PLAYGROUND 5-12 YEAR OLD USERS I. PICNIC AREA WITH A SHADE STRUCTURE AND TABLES J. TURF GRASS ACTIVITY AREA K. COMMUNITY GARDEN L. bike parking M. 4' SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT THE PROPERTY LINE MULTI-FAMILY AREA N. PLAYGROUND 5-12 YEAR & 3-5 YEAR OLD OLD USERS O. community garden area P. outdoor picnic area Q. 4' high steel picket fence R. DOG RUN WITH 4' CHAIN LINK FENCE SURROUND AB C C D F D G COLLIER CANYON DRIVE CONSTITUTION DRIVE I J K r N Pq l P SHADE TREE 52 ACCENT TREE - MED 54 ACCENT TREE - SMALL 112 NATIVE TREE SPECIES 66 MULTI-FAMILY LANDSCAPE AREA 17,637 sf PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AREA 69,047 sf PARK LANDSCAPE AREA 18,123 sf STORM WATER TREATMENT LANDSCAPE AREA 49,615 sf WATER & WILDLIFE OPEN SPACE 49,761 sf TURF 36,629 sf FALL ZONE MATERIAL 6,671 sf ARTIFICAIL TURF TYPE FLUSH WITH THE ADJACENT PAVED EDGE DECOMPOSED GRANITE 962 sf ARTIFICIAL TURF 11,134 sf FUTSAL COURT SURFACING 2024-09-13 15:48 CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE REFER TO PARK SHEETS FOR

ADDITIONAL POCKET PARKDETAILS

ATTACHMENT
3 218

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR
30" DIA. APOLLO A500 SSL COMPACTOR

RECYCLING

REFUSE ORGANICS FILE FILE ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS ENTRY

LOBBY FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING
PUMP

FIRE ROOM UPDN
TRASH

COLLECTION ORGANICS ORGANICS ORGANICS DN
UP
30" DIA. 30" DIA. 30" DIA.

MAIL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 36" D-ISLAND 42"x24" RETURN SHELL - REVERSIBLE 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20 EL
10T 2P
4C16D-20
TURN

AROUND TURN AROUND

PARCEL ROOM
10T 2P
4C16D-20 10T 2P 4C16D-20
10T 2P
4C16D-20 VAN

ELECTRICAL ROOM

GENERATOR

ROOM EVCS VAN
###########x########### ###########x########### UPDN 5' DIA. DN UP
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PLANL2 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0SCALE: 30 60 90 feet 1"=30' NORTH
ATTACHMENT 3
219

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
UPDN UPDN 5' DIA. DN
UP
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PLANL3 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 LANDSCAPE PLAN - CITY PARK 0SCALE: 30 60 90 feet 1"=30' NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN - MULTI-FAMILY SHADE TREE ACCENT TREE - MED ACCENT TREE - SMALL NATIVE TREE SPECIES MULTI-FAMILY LANDSCAPE AREA PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AREA PARK LANDSCAPE AREA STORM WATER TREATMENT LANDSCAPE AREA WATER & WILDLIFE OPEN SPACE TURF FALL ZONE MATERIAL ARTIFICAIL TURF TYPE FLUSH WITH THE ADJACENT PAVED EDGE DECOMPOSED GRANITE ARTIFICIAL TURF FUTSAL COURT SURFACING 2024-09-13 15:47 CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE ATTACHMENT 3
220

CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA PLANT SCHEDULEL4 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT MATURE WIDTH Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 24" low 40 - 65' ht. 40 - 65' w. Ginkgo biloba `Princeton Sentry` Princeton Sentry Ginkgo 24" Medium 40 - 65' ht. 15 - 25' w. Lagerstroemia x `Natchez` Crape Myrtle 15 gal. Low 15 - 25' ht. 15 - 25' w. Laurus nobilis 'saratoga' Sweet Bay 15 gal. Low 15 - 40' ht. 25 - 40' w. Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 24" Low > 65' ht. 15 - 25' w. Pistacia chinensis `Keith Davey` Keith Davey Chinese Pistache 24" Low 25 - 40' ht. 25 - 40' w. Platanus x acerifolia 'columbia' London Plane Tree 15 gal. Medium 40 - 65' ht. 40 - 65' w. Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15 gal. Very low 40 - 65' ht. 25 - 40' w. Ulmus parvifolia `True Green` True Green Elm 15 gal. Low 40 - 65' ht. 25 - 40' w. x Chitalpa tashkentensis `Pink Dawn` Pink Dawn Chitalpa 15 gal. Low 25 - 40' ht. 25 - 40' w. SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT MATURE WIDTH Arctostaphylos densiflora `Howard McMinn` Howard McMinn Vine Hill Manzanita 5 gal. Low 3 - 1' ht. 3 - 10' w. Callistemon citrinus `Violaceus` Purple Lemon Bottlebrush 5 gal. Low 15 - 25' ht. 15 - 25' w. Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Multi-trunk 15 gal. multi-stem Very low 10 - 25' ht. 6 - 10' w. Mahonia repens Creeping Mahonia 5 gal. Low 6 - 18" ht. 1 - 3' w. Nandina domestica Heavenly Bamboo 5 gal. Low 3 - 6' ht. 1 - 3' w. Olea europaea `LITTLE OLLIE' Wilson Olive 5 gal. Very low 25 - 40' ht. Ribes sanguineum Red Flowering Currant 5 gal. Low 6 - 10' ht. 3 - 10' w. GRASSES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT MATURE WIDTH Festuca glauca `Elijah Blue` Blue Fescue 1 gal. Low 6 - 18" ht. 1 - 3' w. Muhlenbergia capillaris `Pink Cloud` Pink Muhly 5 gal. Low 3 - 6' ht. 3 - 6' w. Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 5 gal. Low 3 - 6' ht. 3 - 6' w. PERENNIALS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT MATURE WIDTH Achillea millefolium `Moonshine` Yarrow 1 gal. Low 6 - 18" ht. 1 - 3' w. Iris douglasiana `Pacific Coast Hybrids` PCH Iris 1 gal. Low 18 - 36" ht. 1 - 3' w. Salvia clevelandii `Allen Chickering` Cleveland Sage 5 gal. Very low 3 - 6' ht. 3 - 6' w. FLOW-THROUGH PLANTERS - NATIVES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT MATURE WIDTH Carex tumulicola BERKELEY Sedge - L 1 gal. Low 6 - 18" ht. 1 - 3' w. Juncus patens `Carman`s Grey` - L Spreading Rush 1 gal. Low 18 - 36" ht. Nassella pulchra - L Purple Needle Grass 1 gal. Very low 18 - 36" ht. GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER SPACING WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT MATURE WIDTH Acacia redolens Bank Catclaw 1 gal. 120" o.c. Very low 18" - 6' ht. 10 - 15' w. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi 'Point Reyes' Point Reyes Kinnikinnick 1 gal. 120" o.c. Low < 6" ht. 10 - 15' w. Baccharis pilularis `Twin Peaks #2` Twin Peaks Coyote Brush 1 gal. 36" o.c. Very low 18 - 36" ht. 3 - 6' w. Lantana montevidensis `Purple` Trailing Lantana 1 gal. 36" o.c. Low 6 - 18" ht. 3 - 6' w. Myoporum parvifolium Trailing Myoporum 1 gal. 96" o.c. Low < - 18" ht. 3 - 10' w. Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' trailing Rosemary 1 gal. 36" o.c. Low 18 - 36" ht. 1 - 3' w. 2022-10-26 14:00 PLANT SCHEDULE

ATTACHMENT
3 221

CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA PLANT IMAGES L5 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 Celtis occidentalis Ginkgo biloba `Princeton Sentry` Lagerstroemia x `Natchez` Laurus nobilis 'saratoga' Pinus canariensis Pistacia chinensis `Keith Davey` Platanus x acerifolia 'columbia' Quercus agrifolia Ulmus parvifolia `True Green` x Chitalpa tashkentensis `Pink Dawn` PROPOSED TREES PROPOSED SHRUBS Arctostaphylos densiflora `Howard McMinn` Callistemon citrinus `Violaceus` Cercis occidentalis Mahonia repens Nandina domestica Olea europaea `LITTLE OLLIE' Ribes sanguineum Festuca glauca `Elijah Blue` Muhlenbergia capillaris `Pink Cloud` Muhlenbergia rigens

ATTACHMENT
3 222

CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA PLANT IMAGES L6 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 PROPOSED PERENNIALS AND STORM WATER PLANTINGS PROPOSED GROUND COVERS Achillea millefolium `Moonshine` Iris douglasiana `Pacific Coast Hybrids` Salvia clevelandii `Allen Chickering` Carex tumulicola Juncus patens `Carman`s Grey` Nassella pulchra Acacia redolens Arctostaphylos uva-ursi 'Point Reyes' Baccharis pilularis `Twin Peaks #2` Lantana montevidensis `Purple` Myoporum parvifolium Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus'

ATTACHMENT
3 223

VAN USPS EVCS VAN
UPDN UPDN 5' DIA. DN
UP
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES
BIKE RACK DD04-LL-G
4 BIKES CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA SCHEMATIC IRRIGATION PLAN L7 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0SCALE: 50 100 150 feet 1"=50' NORTH HYDRO ZONE VERY LOW 54,504 SF HYDRO ZONE LOW 78,200 SF HYDRO ZONE MEDIUM 3,265 SF HYDRO ZONE HIGH 39,263 SF HYDRO ZONE TREE 9,229 SF ATTACHMENT 3
224

CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND CHU PROPERTIES

LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
CONSTITUTION DR. AT COLLIER CANYON DRIVE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA SITE FURNISHINGS L8 THOMAS H. PHELPS L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E IDLA, INC. California Landscape Architect #4122 ID #LA-16771 * HI #LA-16112 P.O.BOX 170129 Boise, Idaho 83717 [email protected] (208) 906-1300 BIKE RACK PICNIC TABLES PLAYGROUND FALL ZONE MATERIAL BENCHES & TRASH RECEPTACLES dog waste system BARBEQUE

ATTACHMENT
3 225

STORAGE

BICYCLE
ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING
T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION
DN
UP

MAIL ROOM
ELEL
MPOE
TURN
AROUND
TURN

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM

ELECTRICAL ROOMGENERATOR
ROOM

GNV GNV GNV GNV GNV GNV
FX4
425.07 COLLIER CANYON DR GATEWAY AVENUE H STREET G STREET

COLLIER CANYON ROAD

T T USPS
TRASH

STAGING / MOVE-IN EVCS VAN VAN
17 STALLS

RESIDENTIAL ENTRY

RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY EVC EVC EVR EVR EVR EVR EVR T 208.288.2181 Project:23PAC01
ATTACHMENT 3
226

STORAGE

BICYCLE
ENTRY

MAINTENANCE ROOM
LOBBY
UPDN

FILE/ STORAGE OFFICE

LEASING T
PUMP

FIRE ROOM

ELEV RM UPDN BOILER
TRASH

COLLECTION
DN
UP

MAIL ROOM
ELEL
MPOE
TURN
AROUND
TURN

AROUND TURN AROUND
TURN
AROUND

PARCEL ROOM

ELECTRICAL ROOMGENERATOR
ROOM

GNV GNV GNV GNV GNV GNV
FX4
425.07 COLLIER CANYON DR GATEWAY AVENUE H STREET G STREET COLLIER CANYON ROAD T T USPS TRASH

STAGING / MOVE-IN EVCS VAN VAN
17 STALLS

RESIDENTIAL ENTRY
RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY EVC EVC EVR EVR EVR EVR EVR T 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.4 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.2 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.3 3.0 2.1 2.4 2.9 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.5 2.4 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.1 2.3 2.3 3.1 5.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.5 2.8 3.1 2.1 0.9 0.6 1.1 2.6 3.3 2.7 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.6 3.1 3.3 1.9 0.7 0.5 1.2 2.6 3.2 2.4 1.0 0.7 1.5 3.0 3.2 1.9 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 3.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 3.3 2.2 1.7 1.8 1.4 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.0 0.7 1.4 3.0 3.5 2.4 1.0 0.5 0.9 2.0 3.2 2.9 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.7 2.3 2.2 1.4 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.4 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 3.3 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.6 3.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 3.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.2 2.0 2.5 1.9 2.1 2.3 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.3 3.1 1.5 1.7 2.1 1.3 1.0 1.5 4.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.2 0.9 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.1 2.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.7 2.6 2.1 1.4 1.3 0.9 1.0 2.5 6.2 1.5 1.4 1.4 0.9 1.2 3.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.0 1.3 2.7 1.9 1.6 2.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 2.5 1.7 2.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.1 1.0 1.8 3.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 0.6 1.5 1.1 1.2 3.0 2.8 1.7 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.7 4.3 4.6 2.0 0.7 0.4 1.1 3.4 5.1 2.9 0.9 0.4 0.7 2.3 5.1 4.0 1.3 0.5 0.5 1.4 4.2 5.2 2.1 0.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.6 4.1 2.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.3 0.7 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.1 1.6 0.7 0.4 0.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 2.3 4.2 2.1 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.9 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.0 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 2.5 4.7 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.9 1.9 3.5 3.6 1.9 0.7 0.6 1.5 3.8 4.4 2.3 0.7 0.4 1.0 2.8 4.4 3.2 1.2 0.5 0.6 1.9 4.0 3.9 1.8 0.7 0.6 1.5 2.8 2.9 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.1 3.0 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.3 3.3 1.8 1.7 2.0 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.2 2.0 2.7 1.8 2.0 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 2.9 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.1 1.5 2.6 1.7 1.7 1.1 1.3 3.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.7 4.5 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.9 4.8 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.1 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 2.4 1.5 1.6 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.2 1.6 1.8 1.1 1.5 3.6 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.9 5.3 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.3 1.1 2.1 4.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 0.5 0.4 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 2.3 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.6 2.5 2.6 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.7 0.8 0.8 1.7 2.5 2.5 1.6 0.7 0.6 1.2 1.9 2.0 1.5 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.5 2.6 1.6 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.3 3.0 2.7 1.7 1.7 2.5 3.8 5.9 6.1 4.1 1.6 1.0 1.7 2.8 2.9 1.8 0.8 0.7 1.6 2.7 2.7 1.7 0.8 0.6 1.4 2.8 3.0 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.7 4.6 2.5 1.7 1.9 2.5 4.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.3 2.2 5.1 2.2 1.8 2.0 2.3 1.6 1.4 1.5 2.2 3.2 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.4 1.3 2.4 4.0 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.1 2.7 7.1 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.2 1.1 2.6 2.3 1.6 1.6 1.1 1.1 2.0 2.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 2.4 1.4 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.4 1.3 0.9 1.1 2.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.9 1.2 3.3 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.1 1.3 3.3 2.3 1.7 1.9 1.1 1.2 2.2 2.6 1.8 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 2.5 1.8 1.9 2.1 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.3 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.5 0.6 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.6 3.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.8 3.6 3.8 2.0 0.7 0.7 1.9 3.9 3.8 1.8 0.7 0.8 2.2 4.1 3.7 1.6 0.6 0.6 1.6 3.1 3.2 2.7 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.0 2.0 5.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.4 0.9 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 2.0 5.5 1.8 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.4 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.4 0.8 0.8 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.5 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.7 2.7 4.2 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.2 3.9 3.7 1.7 0.6 0.7 2.0 4.6 4.3 1.7 0.6 0.7 2.0 4.4 4.2 1.7 0.6 0.6 1.6 4.3 4.7 2.0 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.6 2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.4 1.0 1.5 2.5 1.1 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.9 5.0 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.2 2.3 5.9 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.4 1.4 2.7 5.1 3.9 1.9 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 2.2 5.0 3.7 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.7 4.6 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.4 3.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.0 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.1 1.0 1.7 4.6 2.4 1.8 2.0 1.2 1.1 2.5 4.6 2.4 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.2 1.0 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.8 2.1 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.4 0.4 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.3 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.6 2.3 2.2 1.5 0.8 0.9 1.8 2.4 2.3 1.4 0.7 0.9 1.9 2.5 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.4 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.7 2.2 3.6 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.6 2.5 1.4 0.7 0.9 2.0 3.1 2.9 1.5 0.7 0.8 1.9 3.0 2.8 1.4 0.6 0.7 1.8 3.2 3.1 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.6 2.5 2.7 2.2 2.1 1.5 1.2 2.2 5.4 3.6 2.0 1.7 2.2 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.1 1.5 1.2 2.3 6.3 2.3 1.8 1.7 2.0 2.3 1.6 1.3 2.0 4.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.6 1.4 2.0 1.3 1.2 1.5 3.3 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 2.6 3.5 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.1 2.8 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.2 1.1 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.1 2.3 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.1 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.2 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.3 2.5 2.4 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.0 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.0 7.0 3.6 1.4 1.1 2.3 3.5 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.8 4.1 1.4 1.1 2.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.3 4.1 1.8 1.1 2.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.1 2.2 1.8 0.9 1.0 1.6 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.0 0.9 1.1 2.8 1.2 1.1 3.0 1.4 1.0 2.3 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.5 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.3 2.3 0.9 1.5 4.0 1.3 1.5 4.3 1.5 1.3 2.9 1.5 1.0 1.2 1.4 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.7 0.7 1.0 2.9 0.8 1.0 3.3 0.9 0.9 2.7 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 7.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.2 3.0 1.4 2.0 2.1 1.4 2.0 2.4 1.2 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.2 2.0 0.7 2.6 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.2 2.5 2.5 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.3 1.2 1.2 2.6 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.3 1.2 1.2 2.6 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.4 1.2 1.2 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.4 2.8 2.0 2.6 2.7 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.6 3.4 2.9 1.9 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.8 3.3 2.5 1.6 3.2 2.3 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.3 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.3 2.7 2.2 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.8 2.5 0.6 3.5 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 2.1 0.5 0.3 3.7 2.7 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.10.9 2.9 1.5 2.2 3.1 2.9 1.9 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.2 2.7 2.3 1.0 3.5 2.3 3.1 2.8 1.9 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.6 3.4 2.1 2.8 3.3 1.1 2.7 1.7 1.0 1.0 3.4 1.8 2.6 2.3 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 0.8 2.8 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.0 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.7 1.4 2.5 1.9 2.2 2.8 1.5 2.2 2.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.6 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.8 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2 2.5 2.0 1.9 1.4 1.0 1.2 2.1 1.9 1.3 0.8 1.8 1.7 1.2 0.7 2.3 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.6 2.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.5 2.4 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.1 0.9 2.0 1.7 1.2 1.2 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 3.0 1.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.7 0.3 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.5 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.5 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.9 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.1 0.5 0.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.3 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.2 0.7 0.6 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.7 1.0 1.9 2.1 2.8 2.7 1.3 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.4 1.8 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.0 1.4 1.0 1.6 2.1 2.0 1.4 0.9 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.6 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.7 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.5 0.8 0.4 0.5 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.5 0.8 2.4 1.7 1.4 2.0 0.8 2.6 1.3 2.2 1.8 3.2 2.5 1.9 1.7 2.4 1.4 2.2 2.2 0.6 2.3 3.0 1.3 3.0 1.9 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.7 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.7 2.6 2.4 1.7 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.4 2.2 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.4 2.8 2.4 1.7 3.2 2.0 2.1 2.8 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.8 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.5 2.0 1.1 1.3 0.7 1.7 2.8 3.3 2.4 0.9 2.4 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.9 1.3 0.8 2.0 2.9 3.1 0.8 2.1 1.4 0.1 0.1 3.8 0.5 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.4 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.2 1.2 3.1 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.7 3.4 2.2 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.5 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.0 2.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.3 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.8 3.1 2.2 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.5 2.5 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.0 2.4 3.3 2.2 1.4 1.2 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.3 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.9 3.6 4.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 4.8 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.4 3.0 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.6 3.5 3.0 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.9 2.6 3.4 3.1 2.2 2.6 4.6 4.0 4.3 3.6 2.9 1.8 3.0 4.0 3.9 2.8 2.0 4.0 8.8 9.0 6.9 8.6 7.0 9.2 6.7 2.3 3.6 9.4 7.8 2.6 1.3 9.7 208.288.2181 Project:23PAC01

ATTACHMENT
3 227
208.288.2181 Project:23PAC01

ATTACHMENT
3 228
ATTACHMENT 3
229

TRUMARK HOMES

COLLIER
CANYON ROAD SCALE: DATE: 11/12/24

LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

ON SITE PARK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
1" = 20'-0" P1.1

TURF GRASS ACTIVITY AREA OPTIONAL PLAY AREA OR SEATING AREA

BENCH, TYPICAL OPTIONAL COMMUNITY GARDEN OR PLAY AREA

BIKE PARKING

PICNIC AREA WITH SHADE

STRUCTURE AND TABLES
ATTACHMENT 3
230

TRUMARK HOMES

COLLIER
CANYON ROAD SCALE: DATE: 11/12/24

LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC PARK CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY
N/A P2.0

AMENITY OPTIONS
EXAMPLE OF POSSIBLE PLAY STRUCTURE CHOICES FOR 5-12 YEAR OLD KIDS EXAMPLE OF POSSIBLE PLAY STRUCTURE CHOICES FOR 2-5 YEAR OLD KIDS ATTACHMENT 3
231

TRUMARK HOMES

COLLIER
CANYON ROAD SCALE: DATE: 11/12/24

LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC PARK CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY
N/A P2.1

AMENITY OPTIONS

POSSIBLE FITNESS EQUIPMENT

EXAMPLE PARK FURNITURE
ATTACHMENT 3
232

TRUMARK HOMES

COLLIER
CANYON ROAD SCALE: DATE: 11/12/24

LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC PARK CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY
N/A P2.2

YOUTH SOCCER PRACTICE PICNICS KICK BALL LAWN GAMES CATCH

CROQUET FOOTBALL DRILLS VOLLEYBALL FRISBEE FUTSAL

LAWN BOWLING DODGE BALL FLAG FOOTBALL SOCCER DRILLS

AMENITY OPTIONS

MULTI-PURPOSE LAWN ACTIVITIES
ATTACHMENT 3
233

TRUMARK HOMES

COLLIER
CANYON ROAD SCALE: DATE: 11/12/24

LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC PARK CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY
N/A P2.3

AMENITY OPTIONS

WOOD SHADE STRUCTURE OPTION OCATAGONAL SHADE STRUCTURE OPTION RECTANGULAR SHADE STRUCTURE OPTION

STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE ASPHALT TRAIL OPTION

TRAIL OPTION

CONCRETE TRAIL OPTION

EXAMPLE OF WATER TREATMENT GARDENS
ATTACHMENT 3
234
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
October 2, 2019
MEMORANDUM FOR: Planning Directors and Interested Parties FROM: Zachary Olmstead, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development
SUBJECT: No Net Loss Law
Government Code Section 65863
The purpose of Government Code Section 65863 (No Net Loss Law), is to ensure development opportunities remain available throughout the planning period to accommodate a jurisdiction’s regional housing need allocation (RHNA), especially for lower- and moderate- income households. This memorandum provides guidance on the implementation of Government Code section 65863, including amendments pursuant to Chapter 367, Statutes of 2017 (Senate Bill 166).

Summary of No Net Loss Requirements
• A jurisdiction must maintain adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet RHNA by each income category at all times throughout the entire planning period. • A jurisdiction may not take any action to reduce a parcel’s residential density unless it makes findings that the remaining sites identified in its Housing Element sites inventory can accommodate the jurisdiction’s remaining unmet RHNA by each income category, or if it identifies additional sites so that there is no net loss of residential unit capacity. • If a jurisdiction approves a development of a parcel identified in its Housing Element sites inventory with fewer units than shown in the Housing Element, it must either make findings that the Housing Element’s remaining sites have sufficient capacity to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA by each income level, or identify and make available sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category.
• A jurisdiction may not disapprove a housing project on the basis that approval of the development would trigger the identification or zoning of additional adequate sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA.

If you have any questions, or would like additional information or technical assistance, please contact the Division of Housing Policy Development at (916) 263-2911.

ATTACHMENT 4
235
Table of Contents
Background......................................................................................................................................... 3 No Net Loss Law and Charter Cities ................................................................................................. 4 Responsibilities and Requirements Under No Net Loss Law ......................................................... 4 Maintaining Sites ................................................................................................................................ 4 Helpful Hints...................................................................................................................................... 5 Decisions to Carefully Consider – Development Limitations ............................................................. 5 Jurisdiction Actions ........................................................................................................................... 6 Helpful Hints...................................................................................................................................... 7 Decisions to Carefully Consider – Changes to Zoning ...................................................................... 7 Approval of Development at a Lower Density.................................................................................. 8 Helpful Hints...................................................................................................................................... 9 Decisions to Carefully Consider – Development Approval ................................................................ 9 California Environment Quality Act (CEQA)...................................................................................10 Failure to Comply with No Net Loss Law........................................................................................10 Resources..........................................................................................................................................11 Identifying your Remaining RHNA and Maintaining Capacity..........................................................11 No Net Loss Capacity Calculation Tool Example ............................................................................11 No Net Loss Law Decision Flow Chart ............................................................................................14 Sample Housing Element Program ................................................................................................. 16 No Net Loss Law Statute (Government Code Section 65863) ........................................................17 ATTACHMENT 4
236
Background
Since 1969, California has required that all jurisdictions (cities and counties) adequately plan to meet the housing needs of everyone in the community. California’s local governments meet this requirement by adopting Housing Elements as part of their general plan. To demonstrate the availability of land to accommodate future housing development, a Housing Element is required to include an inventory of housing sites, or “adequate sites”, with sufficient capacity by income level to accommodate a jurisdiction’s RHNA by income category. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).) Example: RHNA By Income Category
Very Low Income 300 Units
Low Income 260 Units
Moderate Income 250 Units
Above Moderate Income 650 Units
Total RHNA 1,460 Units
To expand the supply of housing, including affordable housing, and to ensure jurisdictions do not take actions to reduce the potential capacity for new development, the Legislature adopted the No Net Loss Law in 2002. The No Net Loss Law ensures that a jurisdiction maintains a sufficient supply of adequate sites in the Housing Element sites inventory throughout the RHNA planning period. This law was amended by Chapter 367, Statutes of 2017 (Senate Bill 166), which requires sufficient adequate sites to be available at all times to meet a jurisdiction’s remaining unmet housing needs for each income category. To comply with the No Net Loss Law, as jurisdictions make decisions regarding zoning and land use, or development occurs, jurisdictions must assess their ability to accommodate new housing on the remaining sites in their Housing Element site inventories. A jurisdiction must add adequate sites if land use decisions or development results in a shortfall of sufficient sites to accommodate its remaining housing need for each income category.

What is an adequate site?
Pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, an adequate site must be available and suitable to accommodate development. Factors include:
• Have infrastructure available or planned to support a housing development. • Be available to be developed in the planning period. For non-vacant sites, this means that the existing use is not an impediment to additional residential development. • Be appropriately sized (larger than half an acre and smaller than 10 acres) to accommodate lower income housing.
• For sites accommodating lower income households, the sites must have appropriate zoning as demonstrated by analysis, or by meeting prescribed densities. • Identify the number of units (capacity) that can be realistically accommodated on the site.

For more information, visit the Department’s Housing Element Building Block Webpage.

ATTACHMENT 4
237
No Net Loss Law and Charter Cities
Pursuant to Chapter 856, Statutes of 2018 (Senate Bill 1333), the No Net Loss Law applies to all jurisdictions, including charter cities. This requirement was effective on January 1, 2019, and applies to the current and subsequent Housing Element planning periods.

Responsibilities and Requirements Under No Net Loss Law No Net Loss Law can be divided into three statutory areas of responsibility for jurisdictions to consider when making land-use decisions related to sites and capacity identified in the Housing Element to accommodate the RHNA:
• Maintaining Sites (Government Code section 65863(a))
• Jurisdiction Actions Relating to Zoning (Government Code section 65863(b)(1)) • Approval of Development at a Lower Density (Government Code section 65863(b)(2)) Maintaining Sites
A jurisdiction must ensure their Housing Element sites inventory continues to have capacity at all times to accommodate the RHNA by income group throughout the planning period. This requires a careful accounting of development on the sites identified in the Housing Element and residential projects throughout the jurisdiction. Action by the jurisdiction to modify development standards in a way that would result in a lower density, limit or stop development on sites identified in the inventory, exchange sites in the inventory, or downzone sites would trigger No Net Loss unless the jurisdiction can make the required findings or identify alternative sites.

If, at any time during the planning period, the jurisdiction finds that there is a shortfall of sites to accommodate its remaining RHNA, the jurisdiction must take immediate action to correct the shortfall by amending its Housing Element sites inventory to either include sites previously unidentified with capacity to accommodate the shortfall, or sites that have been rezoned to correct for the shortfall.

Failure to do so constitutes a violation of the No Net Loss law. Please note, Housing Element law requires the element to identify sufficient adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA for all income levels. However, many jurisdictions choose to include sites in their Housing Element inventory above and beyond what is required to accommodate RHNA, including sites that are not considered suitable to accommodate RHNA for lower-income households (e.g., sites less than one-half acre or larger than 10 acres). When making findings that the Housing Element continues to accommodate the remaining RHNA, jurisdictions should only consider capacity of sites in the inventory that was determined adequate. Jurisdictions should not consider inadequate or unsuitable sites as adequate or available to accommodate RHNA for the purposes of No Net Loss Law.

The lack of sites to accommodate the jurisdiction’s RHNA represents a fundamental alteration to the jurisdiction’s ability to meet Housing Element Law. Therefore, the amended inventory must (1) demonstrate sites to address the shortfall meet the adequate site requirements of Housing Element Law, pursuant to Government Code section 65585(b), and (2) be submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) for review to ensure compliance with state Housing Element Law. (Cal. Gov’t Code §65580 et seq.) (Housing Element Law).

ATTACHMENT 4
238
Helpful Hints
To ensure that sufficient capacity exists in the Housing Element to accommodate the RHNA throughout the planning period, create a buffer in the Housing Element inventory of at least 15 to 30 percent more capacity than required, especially for capacity to accommodate the lower-income RHNA. Jurisdictions can also create a buffer by projecting capacity less than what is allowed from the maximum density to allow for some reductions in density, or rezoning additional sites above what is needed to accommodate the RHNA.

Jurisdictions should keep an updated accounting of development on the sites in the inventory and throughout the jurisdiction to ascertain the impact that development has on accommodating the remaining RHNA. This can be done in any number of ways, but an example of one methodology can be found in the Resources section below, in addition to a program committing to such an update in the Housing Element.

Decisions to Carefully Consider – Development Limitations No Net Loss Law explicitly states that at no time may a jurisdiction take an action to permit or cause the sites inventory to be insufficient to meet its remaining RHNA without triggering the statute. The only exception is the 180-day timeframe for replacing capacity from the approval of a development at a lower density that results in a shortfall of sites to accommodate the RHNA (see page 8.) Therefore, a jurisdiction should carefully consider the introduction or adoption of development limitations (e.g., development standard limitations, policies or ordinances that affect the development potential of a site, development moratorium). A jurisdiction should carefully examine the effect of these types of actions on development capacity and consult with their legal counsel prior to approval.

Zoning and Development Standard Modifications – Changes in development standards may affect the potential capacity of a site. For example, an increase in parking requirements, reductions in height limitations or lot coverage, new design requirements, or modifications to set-back requirements, all impact the buildable area of a site and could reduce the housing unit potential. Zoning and development standard modifications should be carefully considered to ensure that they do not impact the potential capacity of a site in a jurisdiction’s inventory.

Growth Control Ordinances – If a jurisdiction considers adoption of an ordinance or other measure that limits growth or development potential through unit or population caps, or limits where development can occur through the use of buffers, or by phasing development, it must consider the statewide shortage of housing and the requirements of No Net Loss Law. The adoption of one or more of these types of ordinances could prevent a jurisdiction from accommodating its RHNA either by affecting a site in the inventory, or by limiting development as a whole. Proposed growth limiting ordinances should be prudently drafted so as not to impact the accommodation of the remaining RHNA throughout the planning period. Otherwise, implementation of the ordinance may violate No Net Loss Law.

ATTACHMENT 4
239
How do growth control ordinances relate to the RHNA?
Government Code section 65302.8 requires findings be made to ensure that a jurisdiction can continue to fulfill requirements of Housing Element Law, including the accommodation of the RHNA. Findings include a description of the following:
• The jurisdiction’s RHNA.
• The specific housing programs and activities being undertaken by the jurisdiction to achieve RHNA objectives.
• How the public health, safety, and welfare would be promoted. • Fiscal and environmental resources available to the local jurisdiction.

Moratoriums – Pursuant to Government Code section 65858, jurisdictions may adopt a 45-day interim ordinance prohibiting any uses, including housing, that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal. This applies to a general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission or the planning department is considering, studying, or intends to study within a reasonable time. While the ordinance may be extended for other uses, a moratorium on the development of multifamily housing cannot be extended unless specific findings are made. In addition, regardless of its duration, a moratorium that affects sites in the Housing Element inventory may be in conflict with the No Net Loss Law, as the law requires a jurisdiction to maintain capacity at all times to accommodate the RHNA. A jurisdiction should consult counsel prior to enacting a moratorium on housing.

Jurisdiction Actions
Jurisdiction actions include downzoning or other actions taken by a jurisdiction to reduce a parcel’s allowable residential density. This can be done through a change in zoning or an imposition of density limitations that preclude that ability to achieve densities assumed in the Housing Element sites inventory. If the parcel to be downzoned is identified in the Housing Element, a jurisdiction must make written findings, supported by substantial evidence, that:
• The reduction is consistent with the jurisdiction’s adopted general plan, including the Housing Element. For example, this finding could be made if downzone does not change the land use and zoning designation.
• The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s remaining share of the RHNA for the planning period. The finding must include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s RHNA at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the Housing Element to accommodate that need by income level.

ATTACHMENT 4
240
If a jurisdiction cannot make these findings, it may take action to reduce the residential density of a parcel only if it identifies or rezones additional sufficient adequate sites with an equal or greater residential density in the jurisdiction so that there is sufficient residential unit capacity appropriate to accommodate the RHNA by income level. Actions to identify additional sites or rezone must occur before or concurrently with any action or approval to reduce a parcel’s density. Sites identified or rezoned must meet the following criteria:
• Must be considered an adequate site pursuant to the requirements of Government Code section 65583.2.
• If the capacity to be replaced was on a site that was zoned by-right pursuant to Government Code section 65863.2 (h) and (i), then the replacement site must also satisfy those requirements.

As these actions taken by the jurisdiction represent a fundamental alteration to the Housing Element, the Housing Element sites inventory must then be amended and, pursuant to Government Code section 65585(b), be submitted to the Department for review to ensure the compliance with state Housing Element Law, prior to, or concurrently with, any action or approval to reduce a parcel’s density.

Helpful Hints
If unsure as to whether new sites identified or rezoned will meet Housing Element adequate sites requirements, contact the Department’s Housing Policy Division for a Housing Element reviewer to provide technical guidance.

Rezoned sites may include sites previously identified in the sites inventory that are rezoned to a higher density zoning designation than identified in the sites inventory.

Decisions to Carefully Consider – Changes to Zoning
General Plan Updates – Sometimes land use inconsistencies arise during a general plan update when undertaken separately from the Housing Element. A jurisdiction updating the land use element of the general plan must consider the sites inventory of the Housing Element. If sites identified in the Housing Element site’s inventory will be downzoned as part of the general plan update, other sites must be identified or rezoned to accommodate the resulting shortfall of capacity. Under state law, the land use element must be consistent with the Housing Element, and if the land use element does not permit the density in the Housing Element, the Housing Element or land use element must be amended to achieve consistency.

ATTACHMENT 4
241
Approval of Development at a Lower Density
A jurisdiction must make written findings or identify additional site capacity if a development is allowed with a lower density than what was assumed in the sites inventory of the Housing Element.

A lower residential density sometimes results from a jurisdiction either approving a development with residential units less than what was assumed for the site or affordable to a different income category than the site was assumed to accommodate. Lower residential density could also result from another use, such as commercial being approved on a site identified in the inventory for housing regardless of what the zoning allows.

What constitutes a “lower-density”?
For jurisdictions with an adopted Housing Element found in compliance with Housing Element Law:
• Fewer units will be developed on the site than projected in the sites inventory (capacity) or program of the Housing Element.

For jurisdictions out of compliance with Housing Element Law:
• A density that is lower than 80 percent of the maximum allowable residential density for that parcel, or 80 percent of the maximum density required by Government Code section 65583.2(c)(3), whichever is greater. For more information on default densities, please see the Department’s Building Block website.

At the time of approval, the following written findings must be made, and supported by substantial evidence in the record:
• Remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to meet the jurisdiction’s remaining RHNA for the planning period by income category. • The findings should include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s RHNA at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the Housing Element, to accommodate that need by income level.

If the approval of a development at a lower residential density results in the remaining sites capacity becoming inadequate to accommodate the RHNA by income category, a jurisdiction has up to 180 days from the approval to identify, or rezone, “sufficient additional, adequate, and available sites” to accommodate the remaining RHNA for each income category. Sites identified or rezoned must meet the following criteria:
• Must be considered an adequate site pursuant to the requirements of Government Code section 65583.2.
• If the capacity to be replaced was on a site that was zoned by-right pursuant to Government Code section 65863.2 (h) and (i), then the replacement site must also satisfy those requirements.

ATTACHMENT 4
242
A jurisdiction must report in the jurisdiction’s Annual Progress Report (APR) any sites that have been identified or rezoned to accommodate the resulting shortfall due to the approval of a development at a lower density. APRs are required to be sent to the Department by all jurisdictions by April 1, pursuant to Government Code section 65400. For more information on completing this section of the APR, see the Department Webpage and select “Annual Progress Reports.” Who makes the findings?
The body that “takes action or approves” the jurisdiction action to reduce a parcel’s density or approve a development at a lower density would make the findings. For example, if a zoning administrator approves a development at a lower density, as part of the approval, the administrator would include the appropriate findings. For instance, if the development approval is ministerial under the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB 35, 2017), the findings should be included as part of the plan review and approval. If the City Council is approving a zone change, it must include the findings in the resolution adopting the zone change.

Helpful Hints
The jurisdiction has only 180 days to complete any rezoning needed to accommodate a shortfall of adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA due to the approval of a development at a lower density. To ensure the rezones can be completed on time, it is recommended that the jurisdiction begin the rezone process early in the development application approval process.

Jurisdictions may post the sites inventory on their website with the capacity estimates from the Housing Element for developers to reference when considering projects on sites identified in the Housing Element.

Decisions to Carefully Consider – Development Approval
Jurisdictions out of compliance with state Housing Element Law - No Net Loss Law provisions related to approving a lower density development applies to all jurisdictions regardless of Housing Element compliance status. A jurisdiction that has not adopted a Housing Element within 90 days of the due date, or has a Housing Element out of compliance, must still comply with No Net Loss requirements, even though they may not have a Housing Element Law compliant sites inventory. If the jurisdiction does not have a current sites inventory to compare the project unit count, the determination of lower density would be required for all new housing development.

ATTACHMENT 4
243
Denying an application - A jurisdiction may not deny a housing development application on the basis that approval of the development would trigger the identification, or zoning, of additional adequate sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA.

However, since the term “housing development” is used in the statute, it does not prevent a jurisdiction from denying a non-residential development on an identified site if it would trigger the identification, or rezoning, of additional adequate sites.

Requests for developer assistance with complying with No Net Loss Law – While the jurisdiction is solely responsible for compliance with No Net Loss Law, under limited circumstances the statute does allow a jurisdiction the option to require the applicant to assist the jurisdiction in meeting these provisions. Specifically, requests can be made if an applicant’s initial development application requests a residential density that results in the remaining sites in the sites inventory being insufficient to accommodate it remaining RHNA. A jurisdiction cannot require developer assistance if the subsequent approval process results in a reduction of units.

Types of assistance required could include help with the identification of additional sites for potential rezones or community outreach. However, requests should be balanced with the potential impact on the overall viability of the project. Overly burdensome requirements may make a development project financially infeasible and could, in effect, constitute a denial of the project or may violate the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 65589.5.)
California Environment Quality Act (CEQA)
The act of identifying or making available additional adequate sites, in and of itself, to comply with the statutory requirements to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA, does not trigger a CEQA review. However, if making available additional adequate sites requires an increase in density, a rezone, or other actions that constitute a “project” under CEQA, a CEQA analysis would be required.

When approving a site at a lower residential density, the possibility of a CEQA analysis should be considered since the CEQA review must be completed within the 180-day timeline to identify and rezone additional, adequate sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA by income category. The failure to complete a timely CEQA analysis would render the additional sites inadequate to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA. This would be a violation of No Net Loss Law and could also render the Housing Element out of compliance with state Housing Element Law.

Failure to Comply with No Net Loss Law
In addition to violating of the No Net Loss Law, the failure to ensure that there are sufficient adequate sites to accommodate the unmet RHNA by income category throughout the entire planning period is also a violation of the Housing Element Law. This is because the Housing Element will also fail to identify adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA by income category. As a result, pursuant to Government Code section 65585 (i) and (j), the Department may revoke a jurisdiction’s Housing Element compliance and/or refer the violation to the Attorney General. In addition, a third party may file an action to challenge the jurisdiction in court.

ATTACHMENT 4
244
Resources
Identifying Your Remaining RHNA and Maintaining Capacity A jurisdiction should implement an ongoing, project-by-project evaluation of each approved residential development to ensure that sufficient adequate site capacity is available to accommodate the remaining RHNA by income category throughout the planning period. This evaluation could also be used to complete the APR required to be sent to the Department by April 1 of each year.

The evaluation procedure could utilize a spreadsheet or tool, such as the No Net Loss Capacity Calculation Tool below, to subtract the number of residential units in each approved development from the RHNA to determine the remaining unmet RHNA by income category. The total number of approved units by income category could then be subtracted from the Housing Element’s sites inventory site capacity by income category to determine the remaining site capacity.

No Net Loss Capacity Calculation Tool Example
Step 1: Determine remaining RHNA
• Identify the reported RHNA from permitted projects as reported in the Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Table B of the Annual Progress Report). If the jurisdiction has not yet completed those reports for the planning period, please go to the Departments Webpage and select “Annual Progress Reports.”
• Identify any projects from the planning period that have received their approvals/entitlements and are anticipated to pull their building permits.
• Identify the number of units permitted or that have been approved/entitled in the current reporting year (including accessory dwelling units and other alternatives under Government Code section 65583.1.)
• Calculate the remaining RHNA to date.
• If determining potential No Net Loss capacity of a proposed development, subtract the units from the proposed development to get the remaining RHNA resulting from the proposed project.

ATTACHMENT 4
245
Example:

City A has an application for a market rate project for 75 high-end multifamily apartments. This project is being proposed on a site identified in the inventory as having the ability to accommodate a portion of its very low- and low-income RHNA.

Table A: Remaining RHNA
Very
LowIncome
LowIncomeModerateIncomeAbove ModerateIncome
RHNA 300 260 250 650
Year Reported Progress
2014 -5 -15 -2 -50
2015 -5 -100
2016 -25 -25 -20 -60
2017 -250
2018 -15 -60 -25 -75
Project
Name/APN
Projects approved/entitled anticipated to pull permits
Siempre Verde
001-256-2154, -
57 -4
Project
Name/APN
Current Year Progress
Hightop Condos
001-256-5574
-7 -75
Sunflower Apt
001-256-4475
-25 -50
Remaining RHNA To Date
230 103 198 36
Project
Name/APN
Proposed Project RHNA
Magnolia Luxury
Apt
001-256-4472
-75
Remaining RHNA with Proposed Development
230 103 198 0
Step 2: Determine remaining capacity from the Housing Element sites inventory* • Identify the total site capacity from the Housing Element by income category. • List the capacity estimated in the Housing Element for an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), or other alternative site capacity methodology.
• List the capacity by income category as identified in the Housing Element inventory for each site identified in the inventory that has an approved/entitled or permitted project in the planning period (identified in the previous table).

ATTACHMENT 4
246
Some projects will be developed on sites not identified in the Housing Element. These sites should not be included in the table below, as their capacity was not anticipated to accommodate a portion of the RHNA. They are included in the previous calculation to determine the remaining RHNA. As a result, the additional capacity from these projects can help mitigate loss in capacity from other projects, depending on their affordability.
• For each site rezoned that was identified in the Housing Element (but does not include a project per above) identify the adjusted capacity by income as result of the zone change. • Calculate the remaining available capacity.
• Subtract the capacity identified in the inventory for the proposed development or rezone to calculate the remaining capacity in the sites inventory by income level.

Example Continued:

Table B: Remaining Capacity*
Very LowIncomeLowIncomeModerateIncomeAbove
ModerateIncome
Capacity from sites 325 370 260 800
Capacity from ADU or other
alternative site capacity
methodology
15 10
Project Name/APN Sites Inventory RHNA from Approved/Entitled or Permitted Project
001-256-4758- 868 -160
001-256-5631 -25 -25
001-256-5270 - 330 -60
Dell Webb Master Plan -250
002-40526-7785 -50 -75
002 -526 -7788 -15
001-256-5575 -25 -155
APN Capacity changes due to rezone
003-578-7584 (downzone to open
space)
-30
Remaining Sites Inventory Capacity to Date
240 125 215 330
APN Sites Inventory Capacity from Development or
Rezone
Magnolia Luxury Apt
001-256-4472
-75
Remaining Sites Inventory Capacity with Proposed Development or Rezone 240 50 215 330
* Note: For most 5th cycle Housing Elements, jurisdictions will need to make assumptions on capacity by income category based on density and the analysis provided in the Housing Element, since the 5th cycle sites are not required to be identified by income category. However, for the 6th and subsequent cycles, sites will be required to identify capacity by income level. Some jurisdictions have chosen to combine low and very low- income RHNA for purposes of calculating site capacity, which should be reflected in supporting charts.

ATTACHMENT 4
247
Step 3: Compare remaining RHNA with remaining sites inventory to determine if additional capacity will be needed.
• Input the remaining RHNA from Table A. (If this calculation is due to a proposed development, enter the remaining RHNA from the line “Remaining RHNA with Proposed Development”.) • Input the remaining sites inventory capacity with a proposed development or rezone. • Calculate the No Net Loss potential by subtracting the available capacity from the remaining RHNA. If the result is negative, there is a net loss in capacity, and the difference must be accommodated pursuant to No Net Loss Law.

Example:

Approval of the Magnolia Luxury Apartments would result in a net capacity loss of 53 units. City A would have to rezone or identify additional capacity for at least 53 low-income units.

Table C: No Net Loss Calculation
Very LowIncomeLow-Income ModerateIncomeAbove
ModerateIncome
Remaining Capacity (Table B) 240 50 215 330
Remaining RHNA (Table A) 230 103 198 0
No Net Loss Calculation +10 -53 +17 +330
Please note: There may be many unique circumstances that do not fall neatly into the above example. This calculation tool is meant to be a framework to help jurisdictions think about the best way to identify potential No Net Loss situations.

No Net Loss Law Decision Flow Chart
The following flow chart is intended to help visualize how to determine if a project or a decision would be subject to No Net Loss Law and its remedies. Jurisdictions should consult with legal counsel prior to final determination on whether a project or decision triggers No Net Loss requirements.

ATTACHMENT 4
248
No Net Loss Law Decision Flow Chart
ATTACHMENT 4
249
Sample Housing Element Program
Sample Program: No Net Loss of Residential Capacity to Accommodate the RHNA by Income Category (Government Code section 65863)
To ensure sufficient residential capacity is maintained to accommodate the RHNA for each income category, within one year of adoption of the Housing Element, develop and implement a formal, ongoing (project-by-project) evaluation procedure pursuant to Government Code section 65863. The evaluation procedure will track the number of extremely low-, very low-, low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income units constructed to calculate the remaining unmet RHNA. The evaluation procedure will also track the number of units built on the identified sites to determine the remaining site capacity by income category and will be updated continuously as developments are approved.

No action can be taken to reduce the density or capacity of a site (e.g., downzone, moratorium), unless other additional adequate sites are identified prior to reducing site density or capacity.

If a development is being approved on an identified site at a lower density than what was assumed for that site identified in the Housing Element, additional adequate sites must be made available within 180 days of approving the development. A program to identify the replacement sites, and take the necessary actions to make the site(s) available and ensure they are adequate sites, will be adopted prior to, or at the time of, the approval of the development.

Time Frame: Within six months of adoption of the Housing Element, develop and implement a formal ongoing evaluation procedure pursuant to Government Code section 65863.

Subsequent to adopting an evaluation procedure, monitor rezones and development of residential units, and update Housing Element sites inventory. Housing Element sites inventory is posted on the Planning Department’s website and will be updated at least once a year.

At least annually, update the sites inventory in conjunction with Housing Element Annual Reports pursuant to Government Code section 65400, as necessary.

Responsibility: Community Development Department
Funding Source: General Fund
ATTACHMENT 4
250
No Net Loss Law Statute (Government Code Section 65863) 65863.
(a) Each city, county, or city and county shall ensure that its housing element inventory described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583 or its housing element program to make sites available pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583 can accommodate, at all times throughout the planning period, its remaining unmet share of the regional housing need allocated pursuant to Section 65584, except as provided in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c). At no time, except as provided in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), shall a city, county, or city and county by administrative, quasi-judicial, legislative, or other action permit or cause its inventory of sites identified in the housing element to be insufficient to meet its remaining unmet share of the regional housing need for lower and moderate-income households.
(b) (1) No city, county, or city and county shall, by administrative, quasi-judicial, legislative, or other action, reduce, or require or permit the reduction of, the residential density for any parcel to, or allow development of any parcel at, a lower residential density, as defined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (g), unless the city, county, or city and county makes written findings supported by substantial evidence of both of the following:
(A) The reduction is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. (B) The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level. (2) If a city, county, or city and county, by administrative, quasi-judicial, legislative, or other action, allows development of any parcel with fewer units by income category than identified in the jurisdiction’s housing element for that parcel, the city, county, or city and county shall make a written finding supported by substantial evidence as to whether or not remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level.
(c) (1) If a reduction in residential density for any parcel would result in the remaining sites in the housing element not being adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584, the jurisdiction may reduce the density on that parcel if it identifies sufficient additional, adequate, and available sites with an equal or greater residential density in the jurisdiction so that there is no net loss of residential unit capacity.
(2) If the approval of a development project results in fewer units by income category than identified in the jurisdiction’s housing element for that parcel and the jurisdiction does not find that the remaining sites in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need by income level, the jurisdiction shall within 180 days identify and make available additional adequate sites to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need by income level. Nothing in this section shall authorize a city, county, or city and county to disapprove a housing development project on the basis that approval of the housing project would require compliance with this paragraph.

ATTACHMENT 4
251
(d) The requirements of this section shall be in addition to any other law that may restrict or limit the reduction of residential density.
(e) This section requires that a city, county, or city and county be solely responsible for compliance with this section, unless a project applicant requests in his or her initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the housing element not being adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. In that case, the city, county, or city and county may require the project applicant to comply with this section.

The submission of an application for purposes of this subdivision does not depend on the application being deemed complete or being accepted by the city, county, or city and county. (f) This section shall not be construed to apply to parcels that, prior to January 1, 2003, were either (1) subject to a development agreement, or (2) parcels for which an application for a subdivision map had been submitted.
(g) (1) If the local jurisdiction has adopted a housing element for the current planning period that is in substantial compliance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3, for purposes of this section, “lower residential density” means the following:
(A) For sites on which the zoning designation permits residential use and that are identified in the local jurisdiction’s housing element inventory described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583, fewer units on the site than were projected by the jurisdiction to be accommodated on the site pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2.
(B) For sites that have been or will be rezoned pursuant to the local jurisdiction’s housing element program described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583, fewer units for the site than were projected to be developed on the site in the housing element program. (2) (A) If the local jurisdiction has not adopted a housing element for the current planning period within 90 days of the deadline established by Section 65588 or the adopted housing element is not in substantial compliance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 within 180 days of the deadline established by Section 65588, “lower residential density” means any of the following:
(i) For residentially zoned sites, a density that is lower than 80 percent of the maximum allowable residential density for that parcel or 80 percent of the maximum density required by paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2, whichever is greater. (ii) For sites on which residential and nonresidential uses are permitted, a use that would result in the development of fewer than 80 percent of the number of residential units that would be allowed under the maximum residential density for the site parcel or 80 percent of the maximum density required by paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2, whichever is greater. (B) If the council of governments fails to complete a final housing need allocation pursuant to the deadlines established by Section 65584.05, then for purposes of this paragraph, the deadline pursuant to Section 65588 shall be extended by a time period equal to the number of days of delay incurred by the council of governments in completing the final housing need allocation. (h) An action that obligates a jurisdiction to identify and make available additional adequate sites for residential development pursuant to this section creates no obligation under the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) to identify, analyze, or mitigate the environmental impacts of that subsequent action to identify and make available additional adequate sites as a reasonably foreseeable consequence of that action. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed as a determination as to whether or not the subsequent action by a city, county, or city and county to identify and make available additional ATTACHMENT 4
252
adequate sites is a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code). (i) Notwithstanding Section 65803, this section shall also apply to a charter city.

ATTACHMENT 4
253
DECEMBER 17, 2024 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

PLANNING COMMISSION
December 17, 2024
________________________________________________________________

REGULAR MEETING

1. CALL TO ORDER – The meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jacob Anderson at 7:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S.

Livermore Avenue.

ROLL CALL – Present: Chairperson Anderson, Vice-Chairperson Yolanda Fintschenko, Commissioner Daniel Leary, Commissioner Tracy Kronzak.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. OPEN FORUM
Chairperson Anderson opened and closed the public comment period.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR - NONE

4. PROJECT REVIEW - NONE

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 THE PREVIOUSLY NOTICED ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO THE JANUARY 7, 2025, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.

Hearing to consider a request for a Municipal Code Amendment, Development Code Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Modification, Development Agreement, Site Plan Design Review, and Site Plan Design Review Modification for the Parkwest Casino 580 Expansion Project.

5.2 Hearing to consider a request for Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Consistency Determination to develop vacant land located at the northwest corner of the Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive intersection, with a residential project known as Cornerstone.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolutions:

1. Approving Consistency Determination (CD) 24-010;

2. Recommending the City Council adopt a resolution finding that the project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA ATTACHMENT 5
254
PLANNING COMMISSION Draft Minutes DECEMBER 17, 2024
Guidelines Section 15182 (c), Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan, and CEQA Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning;

3. Recommending the City Council adopt a resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 8669 – Subdivision (SUB) 22-006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, together with the requested Density Bonus waivers and concessions, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval;

4. Recommending the City Council direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.

Assistant Planner Emily LaDue presented the staff report.

Chairperson Anderson opened the public comment period.

Chris Stockhouse, representing Cornerstone and the landowner, explained the purpose and mission of the church to give back to the community and proposal to build affordable housing.

Michael Keaney, Director of Forward Planning, Trumark Homes, presented an overview of the proposed project including exceedance of required affordable units; completion of infrastructure; and collaboration with Pacific Companies.

Caleb Roope, Pacific Companies, discussed their experience in affordable housing developments and work on other projects with Trumark; and expressed excitement about the project.

In response to Commissioner Kronzak, Assistant Planner LaDue explained the buffer between development and the riparian basin; confirmed no need to redesignate housing sites in the City’s housing sites inventory and the units for this project can be included in RHNA Cycle 6.

Chairperson Anderson opened the public comment period.

Brandon Evans, IBW Local 595, requested use of local construction workforces.

Chairperson Anderson closed the public comment period.

Commissioner Leary suggested relocating and reducing the bioretention area; consideration of the location of the bus stop in relation to the pedestrian corridor and bridge; and ensuring appropriate easements for the bridge. He pointed out the requirement to plant trees and charging stations; and commended the developer on the contribution of affordable units above the requirements.

Commissioner Kronzak requested the use of California native trees. In response to Commissioner Kronzak, Assistant Planner LaDue explained the CUP is required due to the project’s distance from the creek.

ATTACHMENT 5
255
DECEMBER 17, 2024 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION
In response to Vice Chair Fintschenko, Assistant Planner LaDue explained podium parking. Planning Manager Riley discussed the findings for the conditional use permit for grading near the creek.

In response to Chair Anderson, Mr. Roope explained the courtyard and outdoor spaces; proposed outdoor space; and bike storage and elevators accommodating bikes. Chair Anderson confirmed the units would be non-smoking and suggested consideration of tying bike parking to density. In response to Chair Anderson, Assistant Planner LaDue explained street design including street parking and bike lanes. Chair Anderson requested shortening of crosswalk distance at Collier Canyon Road and Gateway Avenue, and inclusion of at least pedestrian directional ramps.

Commissioner Kronzak summarized the briefings provided to the Commissioners.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER KRONZAK, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FINTSCHENKO AND CARRIED ON A 4-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 49-24 Approving Consistency Determination (CD) 24-010 for the Cornerstone Residential Development
Resolution 50-24 Recommending the City Council find that the Cornerstone Residential Development is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
Resolution 51-24 Recommending that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 8669 – Subdivision (SUB) 22-006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009, and find no net loss for the Cornerstone Development with an added condition to work with applicant to create a shorter crosswalk at Gateway Avenue and Collier Canyon Road.

RECESS
Chair Anderson called a recess at 8:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:05 p.m. with all Commissioners present.

6. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION

6.1 Comprehensive General Plan Update – Draft Land Use Map and Policy Topics
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission:
• Review and ask clarifying questions on the Draft Preferred Land Use Map
Receive an overview of the Open Space and Conservation
Element, Safety Element, and Noise Element
ATTACHMENT 5
256
PLANNING COMMISSION Draft Minutes DECEMBER 17, 2024
Consider General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) feedback on policy options for the Open Space and Conservation, and Safety Elements
Recommend policy updates for City Council consideration and direction
Principal Planner Andy Ross presented the staff report.

Chairperson Anderson opened the public comment period.

Mark Thompson commented on the recommendation that future parks use less grass and suggested the use of artificial turf.

Connie Kopps questioned whether -702 was supposed to be listed twice in the land use changes section. She discussed her August 2024 letter and requested additional time for public review.

Chairperson Anderson closed the public comment period.

Commissioner Kronzak confirmed that the owner at 2133 Las Positas requested the zone change from business and commercial park to medium density residential, which was anticipated to be granted; explained the lens through which the list was reviewed; and discussed the briefing on the revised land use map, which had not received much public input, other than the developer community finding it refreshing.

Commissioner Leary expressed appreciation for the public comments; agreed with the positive upgrades to the Land Use Map; support for the addition of Wine Country Commercial, and Mixed Industrial Commercial; and questioned combining Highway Serving and Community Serving Commercial. Principal Planner Ross explained the overlap of uses and areas; and confirmed that East of Greenville was paused.

In response Vice Chair Fintschenko, Principal Planner Ross indicated the issue raised by Ms. Kopps was a typographical error. Vice Chair Fintschenko confirmed that the Neighborhood Commercial designation would be more compatible with the existing land uses and indicated the proposed Land Use Designations seemed sensible.

Chair Anderson expressed enthusiasm about the new map; confirmed the City would maintain the current level of control while providing flexibility; indicated support for clarifying Service Commercial and incorporating lite industrial; and expressed appreciation for the Mixed-Use clarification.

The Commission discussed and indicated support to the changes proposed to the General Plan outline.

Vice Chair Fintschenko confirmed the intent to switch to a simpler, goal policy ATTACHMENT 5
257
DECEMBER 17, 2024 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION
model.

In response to Commissioner Kronzak, Principal Planner Ross indicated the changes proposed by the GPAC to the Open Space policies were minimal.

Commissioner Kronzak indicated Policies A, F and X3 and X4 were most directionally consistent and additive to the General Plan, and the others felt like tactics rather than policies.

Commissioner Leary discussed wildlife connectivity.

Vice Chair Fintschenko reiterated the goal to secure and maintain a green belt outside the Urban Growth Boundary seemed overly prescriptive and suggested the goals not describe the required actions. She questioned whether urban separators were possible around the entire City.

Chair Anderson confirmed that the multifunctional greenbelt was proposed for the edges of the City; suggested encouraging agricultural uses for preservation; indicated support for the GPAC feedback; and suggested ensuring the urban forest was maintained.

Commissioner Kronzak indicated Policy Options B and C were closer to the spirit, but A seemed impossible to accomplish; and suggested restrooms at parks in the definition of equitable park access.

Vice Chair Fintschenko reviewed the proposed policies and GPAC suggestions, indicating support for Policy Option C, and the idea of connectivity in open space, with definitions; and suggested prescribing how to conserve water not be included in the policy.

Principal Planner Ross confirmed the Commissioner direction action and tactically oriented items were not included in the goal and policy level, to ensure the goal and policy could be used to evaluate projects objectively for consistency. He explained unfunded mandates.

The Commission discussed the Noise Element and suggested consideration of the science of urbanized noise and mental health; noise metrics in neighboring cities; determination of a standard for equitable consideration of noise issues; addition of a standard for L Max; frequency component and context of what was generating the noise.

The Commission discussed the Safety Element.

Commissioner Kronzak indicated more specificity was a good thing; energy resilience felt too low; support for agricultural resilience; and consideration of insurability of developments.

Commissioner Ross stated developers would not advance projects without being able to insure.

ATTACHMENT 5
258
PLANNING COMMISSION Draft Minutes DECEMBER 17, 2024
Vice Chair Fintschenko indicated support for the emergency notification’s goal; Policy Option C; ensuring General Plan policies were goal oriented rather than tactical; providing general direction of the goal on drought and moving actions elsewhere; and questioned whether there was agriculture within the City limits.

Principal Planner Ross explained the agriculture within the City, sphere of influence and planning area.

Chair Anderson indicated agricultural resilience was important but perhaps should be in Economic Development. Staff indicated the Agricultural Industry could appear in multiple forms throughout the General Plan.

Chair Anderson and Vice Chair Fintschenko discussed the need to consider smoke in relation to walkable developments and transit-oriented communities. Principal Planner Ross discussed strategies on air quality in the Climate Action Plan and consideration of air quality in the General Plan.

Chair Anderson expressed appreciation for planning for a sustainable future.

7. MATTERS INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF
Commissioner Kronzak expressed concern about the deteriorating asphalt and flooding on the ramp to east bound 580 at North Livermore. Chair Anderson stated it was Caltrans property.

Chair Anderson requested confirmation that the lights at Stockman Park were on at dark; and expedited processing of directional ramps.

8. ADJOURNMENT – at 10:19 pm to a Regular Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, January 7, 2025, at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Ave.

ATTACHMENT 5
259
ATTACHMENT 6
260
ATTACHMENT 6
261
ATTACHMENT 6
262
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE CORNERSTONE PROJECT IS EXEMPT

FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The City of Livermore (“City”) received an application from Cornerstone for Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 8669, Subdivision (SUB) 22-006, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 22-004, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-009 and Consistency Determination 24-010 to develop five vacant lots at the northwest corner of the intersection of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive, implementing the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (“Project”). The Project will consist of 21 three story residential buildings and one 5 story apartment building for a total of 253 residential units. The project includes 114 affordable units and four accessible units, one public park and a smaller pocket park, public trail, and related landscaping, parking, stormwater, and frontage improvements.

The applicant has submitted for relief under the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (CA SB330) and Density Bonus under Government Code section 65915.

At a duly noted public hearing on December 17, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the Project, made the necessary findings, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 50-24 recommending the City Council find the Project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (See Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution).

On January 27, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public meeting, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project, took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore, based upon its own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, finds that the Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to California Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182(c), which exempts residential projects that implement a Specific Plan where: 1) a public agency has prepared an EIR on a Specific Plan after January 1, 1980, and the residential project conforms to the Specific Plan; and 2) no events described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred (see Exhibit B – Initial Study).

1. Findings: The Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan and its Supplemental EIR were adopted and certified in 2020 (SCH #2016042039). The Project is located within the Specific Plan’s Village and Center zoning districts. The Project is consistent 263
RESOLUTION NO. ________
with the allowed residential uses of the Village and Center and Open Space zoning districts and is within the minimum and maximum densities of 25 to 40 and 40 to 60 dwelling units per acre, respectively. All required development standards have been met, upon making the findings precedent to granting the requested density bonus waivers and incentives/concessions for height, residential entries, podium parking height, open space and comparability of affordable units, but all other design requirements have been fulfilled. Given that State law supersedes local ordinance, the Project’s use of State Density Bonus Law to waive the aforementioned standards does not result in a Specific Plan inconsistency.

The Project provides more public open space than required through the provision of a 2.5-acre public park, 0.4-acre public pocket park, and 0.34-acre public trail.

The project meets the private open space standards through the provision of private balconies on each condominium unit and the use of a waiver for the affordable apartments. The project meets street frontage setbacks with well landscaped frontages and the required parking through the State Density Bonus Law. The Project provides frontage improvements along the Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive frontages as required by the Specific Plan. Proposed apartment building architecture has a high-quality contemporary design with traditional elements, and proposed townhome architecture has a high-quality traditional design, both with articulated facades, plane changes, and multiple material types, as required by the Specific Plan and citywide Design Standards and Guidelines.

As called for in the Specific Plan, the Project provides six for-sale affordable units to residents with moderate incomes, and 108 for-rent affordable units to residents with extremely-, very-, and low incomes. The Project also implements Specific Plan policies for a walkable neighborhood that provides housing variety by proposing unit types with a range of floor plans and connecting the site to the existing pedestrian circulation network through multiple connection points. The proposed landscape plan conforms to Specific Plan and Design Standards and Guidelines by exceeding the required number of trees per acre and providing large shade trees along walks and the public right-of-way. Specific Plan sustainability requirements are also satisfied given that the Project proposes rooftop solar arrays, California native landscape species, and electric vehicle charging spaces.

The Project is conditioned to comply with the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the certified 2020 Supplemental EIR. In addition, the applicant prepared Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I), geotechnical (soils), biological, traffic, and noise studies that found no significant impacts would occur beyond those identified in the EIR. For these reasons, the Project wholly conforms with the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan, which was prepared and approved after January 1, 1980.
264
RESOLUTION NO. ________

2. Findings: No substantial Project changes are proposed which would require major revisions to the previous Supplemental EIR. The Project proposes 253 residential units, consistent with the allowed uses and densities contemplated in the Supplemental EIR. Substantial changes in circumstances have not occurred requiring major revisions to the previous Supplemental EIR, as the site remains vacant, rough graded in the developable areas, and is surrounded by urban development. There is no new information of substantial importance that would result in new impacts not previously discussed, result in more severe impacts, or require modifications to the existing mitigation measures. The applicant prepared a Phase I, geotechnical (soils), biological, traffic, and noise studies, and found no significant impacts would occur beyond those identified in the EIR and did not yield any new information of substantial importance. For these reasons, no events described in CEQA Section 15162 have occurred and therefore no further environmental review is required.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore, based upon its own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, finds that the Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, which exempts projects consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning where: 1) the project is consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning Action for which a Lead Agency has certified an EIR; and 2) project-specific impacts are not peculiar to the project site.

1. Findings: An Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (Specific Plan) zoning district was established as part of the overall Specific Plan project, as approved by City Council in November 2020. Therefore, the Specific Plan can be considered a “Zoning Action” for purposes of CEQA Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The City Council certified the Specific Plan’s Supplemental EIR (SCH #2016042039) in November 2020 with Specific Plan adoption.

As described in the Planning Commission staff report and Planning Commission staff memorandum, dated December 17, 2024, the Project is consistent with the uses, densities, development standards, and design requirements of the Specific Plan. Given that State law supersedes local ordinance, the Project’s use of State Density Bonus Law waivers and incentives/concessions does not result in a Specific Plan inconsistency. The Project is located within the Specific Plan’s Village and Center and Open Space zoning districts. The Project is consistent with the allowed residential uses of the Transition zoning district and is within the Village and Center zoning districts and is within the minimum and maximum densities of 25 to 40 and 40 to 60 dwelling units per acre, respectively. All required development standards have been met, upon making the findings precedent to granting the requested density bonus waivers and incentives/concessions for height, residential entries, podium parking height, open space and comparability of affordable units, but all other development requirements have been fulfilled. The Project provides more public open space than required through the provision of a 265
RESOLUTION NO. ________

2.5-acre public park, 0.4-acre public pocket park, and 0.34-acre public trail. The Project meets the private open space standards through the provision of private balconies on each condominium townhome unit and the use of a waiver for the affordable apartments. The Project meets street frontage setbacks with well landscaped frontages and the required parking through the State Density Bonus Law. The Project provides frontage improvements along the Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive frontages as required by the Specific Plan.

As called for in the Specific Plan, the Project provides six for-sale affordable units to residents with moderate incomes, and 108 for-rent affordable units to residents with extremely-, very-, and low incomes. The Project also implements Specific Plan policies for a walkable neighborhood that provides housing variety by proposing unit types with a range of floor plans and connecting the site to the existing pedestrian circulation network through multiple connection points. The proposed landscape plan conforms to Specific Plan and Design Standards and Guidelines standards by exceeding the required number of trees per acre and providing large shade trees along walks and the public right-of-way. Specific Plan sustainability requirements are also satisfied given that the Project proposes rooftop solar arrays, California native landscape species, and electric vehicle charging spaces.

2. Findings: There are no specific significant environmental effects which are peculiar to the Project or Project Site, as stipulated in CEQA Guidelines subsection 15183(b)(1) through (b)(4), and as described below:
i. Impacts Peculiar to the Project. The Project is consistent with the uses and intensities contemplated in the Specific Plan. Since Specific Plan adoption, no substantial changes have occurred to the project site nor its surroundings. The site remains undeveloped and rough graded in the areas to be developed. The applicant prepared Phase I, geotechnical (soils), biological, traffic, and noise studies that found no significant impacts would occur beyond those identified in the EIR. For these reasons, no additional project-specific impacts have occurred that are peculiar to the project site.
ii. Environmental Impacts not Previously Analyzed as Significant. The Project is consistent with the uses and intensities contemplated in the Specific Plan, therefore, all potential Project impacts have been previously anticipated and analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR. In addition, the Project is conditioned to comply with the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the certified 2020 Supplemental EIR. The Project will implement the mitigation measures, reducing significant Project impacts to a less than significant level. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with the certified 2020 Supplemental EIR.

The Project will not exacerbate any significant impacts deemed 266
RESOLUTION NO. ________
acceptable in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The applicant also prepared Phase I, geotechnical (soils), biological, traffic, and noise studies, that found no significant impacts would occur beyond those identified in the EIR. For these reasons, there are no significant environmental impacts that were not previously analyzed.
iii. Potentially Significant Offsite or Cumulative Impacts. Since Specific Plan adoption, no substantial changes have occurred to the project site nor its immediate surroundings. Surrounding residential uses that were present during the 2020 Supplemental EIR analysis remain. Therefore, the EIR already anticipated the cumulative impacts of these projects. For these reasons, there are no potentially significant offsite or cumulative impacts not previously analyzed in the 2020 Supplemental EIR.
iv. Substantial New Information. Since Specific Plan adoption, no substantial changes have occurred to the project site nor its surroundings. The site remains undeveloped and rough graded in developable areas. The applicant also prepared Phase I, geotechnical (soils), biological, traffic, and noise studies that found no significant impacts would occur beyond those identified in the EIR.

For these reasons, there is no substantial new information that was not known at the time of EIR adoption.
v. Uniform Mitigations and Development Standards. The Project is subject to complying with all applicable mitigation measures adopted pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Specific Plan’s 2020 Supplemental EIR in addition to the uniformly applied development standards of the Specific Plan and Livermore Development Code. The combination of applicable mitigation measures and uniform standards would reduce all potentially significant impacts to a less than significant level. The applicant, or their successors in interest, is required to implement applicable mitigation measures applicable through conditions of approval.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Clerk if the Project is approved.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the Community Development Department, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore, California.

On the motion by Council Member ________________ seconded by Council Member ______________, the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted on January 27, 2025, by the following vote:
267
RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Deborah L. Elam Katherine Mirassou
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Environmental Resolution Exhibit B – Initial Study
268

EXHIBIT A
269

EXHIBIT A
270

EXHIBIT A
271

EXHIBIT A
272

EXHIBIT A
273
City of Livermore
Community Development Department
Cornerstone Townhomes and Apartment Project
Modified Initial Study/15182 Checklist
December 2024
Prepared by
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834

EXHIBIT B
274

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 1 B. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 2 C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 5 D. SOURCES ....................................................................................................................17 E. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED........................................20 F. DETERMINATION.........................................................................................................21 G. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST..................................................................................22 I. AESTHETICS. ...................................................................................................24 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. ............................................28 III. AIR QUALITY. ...................................................................................................30 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES..............................................................................41 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. ...............................................................................53 VI. ENERGY. ..........................................................................................................55 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.....................................................................................59 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. ...................................................................64 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. ....................................................69 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY..............................................................75 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING. ............................................................................80 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. ..................................................................................82 XIII. NOISE. ..............................................................................................................83 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING..........................................................................88 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES...........................................................................................90 XVI. RECREATION. ..................................................................................................93 XVII. TRANSPORTATION..........................................................................................94 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. ..................................................................98 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. ............................................................100 XX. WILDFIRE........................................................................................................103 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. ...............................................105 APPENDICES:

Appendix A: Air Quality and GHG Modeling Results
Appendix B: Brief Biological Constraints Analysis
Appendix C: Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Appendix D: Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations Appendix E: Phase I ESA
Appendix F: Transportation Assessment

EXHIBIT B
275
A. BACKGROUND

1. Project Title: Cornerstone Townhomes and Apartment Project

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Livermore
Community Development Department
1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550

3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Riley
Planning Manager
(925) 960-4461

4. Project Location: Northwest corner of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive Livermore, CA 94550
Assessor’s Pacel Numbers (APNs) 905-0015-008, -026, -027, -028, and -029

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: The Pacific Companies 430 E. State Street, Suite 100
Eagle, ID 83616

6. General Plan Designation: Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan, Subarea 2d

7. Specific Plan Designation: Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space

8. Zoning Designation: Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan

9. Required Approvals from Other Public Agencies: None

10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The approximately 13-acre project site is located northwest of the intersection of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Road in the City of Livermore, California, and identified as Subarea 2d in the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (INSP), north of Interstate 580 (I580). The project site is identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 905-0015-008, - 026, -027, -028, and -029. The project site is generally undeveloped and currently contains trees and grassland. Collier Creek and its associated riparian corridor run from the northeast corner of the site to the southwest corner and serve as the site’s western property boundary. The northernmost portion of the project site (APN 905-0015-008) was previously developed with a single-family residence, which was demolished in 2019. Three existing wells are located on the project site. An east/west private dirt pedestrian walkway bisects the site, and two private gravel roadways extend into the project site from the southwestern site corner. The first roadway proceeds along the western site boundary, immediately east of the Collier Creek corridor. The second roadway bisects the southern INITIAL STUDY/15182 CHECKLIST
DECEMBER 2024

EXHIBIT B
276
half of the site, from southwest to northeast. Surrounding existing land uses include undeveloped land and the Livermore Zone 7 Water Agency office building to the north; manufacturing facilities and a business park to the east, across Collier Canyon Road; I580, undeveloped land, and auto dealerships to the south; and vacant land, a business park, the Alameda County Social Services Agency, Livermore Social Services office, a senior care center, and Costco to the west. In addition, Isabel Station, the future site of Phase I of the Valley Link Rail Project, is located 0.41-mile east of the project site. The project site is designated INSP by the City’s General Plan; Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space by the INSP; and zoned INSP.

11. Project Description Summary:

The proposed project would include the subdivision of the project site into 13 nonresidential parcels (Parcels A through M) and a total of 22 lots for residential uses. A total of 253 dwelling units and 2.42 acres of private open space area would be provided as part of the project. Lots 1 through 21 would be developed with 21 three-story residential buildings comprised of six affordable and 137 market-rate townhomes. The affordable townhome units would include three 922-square-foot (sf) one-bedroom units and three 1,311-sf two-bedroom units. The market-rate townhome units would include 31 1,726-sf three-bedroom units, 67 1,844-sf four-bedroom units, and 39 2,004-sf four-bedroom units.

Lot 22 would be developed with a five-story apartment complex with 110 residential units, 108 of which would be affordable and two of which would be market-rate manager units.

The units would be a mix of 411-sf studios, 547-sf one-bedroom units, 796-sf two-bedroom units, and 1,079-sf three-bedroom units. The apartment complex would include a firstlevel podium parking garage with up to 104 vehicle stalls for residents, and storage for 48 bicycles for residents and six bicycles for guests.

In addition, a 2.53-acre public park/open space area would be developed on Parcel M on the southern portion of the site and would include a multi-purpose lawn, a water treatment garden, a picnic area with tables and shade structure, paths, trees, and a children’s playground. Parcel L would serve as a 1.61-acre conservation easement and would include a 0.61-acre linear park/trail and a new pedestrian and bicycle path.

The project would require City approval of a Vesting Tentative Map, Site Plan and Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Consistency Determination. In addition, as allowed under State Density Bonus Law, the project applicant is requesting waivers and concessions to the City of Livermore development standards from the City of Livermore.

B. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
The following provides a description of this Modified Initial Study’s approach to evaluating the proposed project’s consistency with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15182 and Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918.

Background
The 2018 INSP1 was adopted and the associated EIR (#SCH #2016042039) certified by the Livermore City Council in May 2018 however, implementation of the 2018 INSP was contingent upon the extension of San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) to Isabel Avenue in the City of Livermore. The Livermore City Council rescinded the approval actions of the 2018 INSP 1 City of Livermore. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan. Amended November 2022.

EXHIBIT B
277
(Resolution #2018-067) after the BART extension to Livermore failed to pass voting by the BART Board of Directors.

In 2020, the City of Livermore prepared an updated INSP, which included modifications to the INSP policies and maps related to the proposed Valley Link Rail system, as well as minor land use map adjustments to better reflect the existing development. A Supplemental EIR (SEIR) to the 2018 INSP EIR2 was prepared and certified for the 2020 INSP update.

The INSP identifies the approximately 13-acre project site as Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space, which assumed the development of residential uses with densities of 25-40 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) within the Residential Village, and 40-60 du/acre in the Residential Center.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15182
This Initial Study/15182 Checklist identifies and analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The information and analysis presented in this document is organized in accordance with the order of the CEQA checklist in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines.

Government Code Section 65457 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 provide an exemption from CEQA for residential projects undertaken pursuant to and in conformity with that specific plan. The scope of this residential exemption applies to land subdivisions, zoning changes, and residential planned unit developments. The requirements of Section 15182 state the following:
(a) General. Certain residential, commercial and mixed-use projects that are consistent with a specific plan adopted pursuant to Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8 of the Government Code are exempt from CEQA, as described in subdivisions (b) and (c) of this section. (b) Projects Proximate to Transit.
(1) Eligibility. A residential or mixed-use project, or a project with a floor area ratio of at least

0.75 on commercially-zoned property, including any required subdivision or zoning approvals, is exempt if the project satisfies the following criteria:
(A) It is located within a transit priority area as defined in Public Resources Code section 21099(a)(7);
(B) It is consistent with a specific plan for which an environmental impact report was certified; and
(C) It is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in either a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy for which the State Air Resources Board has accepted the determination that the sustainable communities strategy or the alternative planning strategy would achieve the applicable greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets.
(2) Limitation. Additional environmental review shall not be required for a project described in this subdivision unless one of the events in section 15162 occurs with respect to that project.
(3) Statute of Limitations. A challenge to a project described in this subdivision is subject to the statute of limitations periods described in section 15112. (c) Residential Projects Implementing Specific Plans
(1) Eligibility. Where a public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, a residential project undertaken pursuant to and in conformity to that specific plan is 2 City of Livermore. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Public Review Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. June 23, 2020.

EXHIBIT B
278
exempt from CEQA if the project meets the requirements of this section. Residential projects covered by this section include but are not limited to land subdivisions, zoning changes, and residential planned unit developments.
(2) Limitation. If after the adoption of the specific plan, an event described in Section 15162 occurs, the exemption in this subdivision shall not apply until the city or county which adopted the specific plan completes a subsequent EIR or a supplement to an EIR on the specific plan. The exemption provided by this section shall again be available to residential projects after the Lead Agency has filed a Notice of Determination on the specific plan as reconsidered by the subsequent EIR or supplement to the EIR. (3) Statute of Limitations. A court action challenging the approval of a project under this subdivision for failure to prepare a supplemental EIR shall be commenced within 30 days after the lead agency's decision to carry out or approve the project in accordance with the specific plan.

As discussed above, 2020 INSP update included development of the project site with residential uses. The proposed project would be consistent with the site’s INSP designation of Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space. With respect to Section 15182(b)(1) and Section 15182(c)(1), the proposed project would be a residential project involving land subdivision. The project site is located within a “transit priority area,” pursuant to CEQA Section 21099(a)(7). A transit priority area is defined therein as an area within 0.5-mile of an existing or planned major transit stop, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program or applicable regional transportation plan. The 2020 updated INSP included development of two new Valley Link Rail Project stations in the City. One station is the Isabel Station, the future site of Phase I of the Valley Link Rail Project, which is located 0.41-mile east of the project site.

The project site is located within Subarea 2d of the INSP, in which between 200 and 286 housing units are required, with a target of 243 units. The proposed project would include a total of 253 units, which is within the Subarea 2d Performance Measure specified range of units. Subarea 2d Performance Measure (a) requires at least two residential product types consistent with INSP Policy P-LU-29. The proposed project would include two residential product types, including 143 affordable and market-rate townhomes and 110 affordable and market-rate apartment units.

Subarea 2d Performance Measure (b) requires building heights to be less than 50 feet above existing grade, or less than the Scenic Corridor limit. While the apartment complex component of the proposed project would result in a maximum building height greater than 50 feet, as allowed under State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918), the project applicant is requesting waivers and concessions to deviate from Performance Measures and development standards. With the exception of the waivers and concessions allowed under the State Density Bonus Law, the proposed project would otherwise meet the development standards set forth for the site. Given that State law supersedes local ordinance, the proposed project’s use of State Density Bonus Law to waive the INSP Scenic Corridor Policy requirements related to building height and setback requirements does not result in a Specific Plan inconsistency.

As set forth by Section 15182(b)(2) and Section 15182(c)(2), the proposed project may only qualify for exemption under Section 15182 if none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present. The following identifies the standards set forth in Section 15162(a):

1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement

EXHIBIT B
279
of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or

3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR [or negative declaration];
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

The following discussion herein confirms that the project has been evaluated for significant impacts pursuant to CEQA. The determination in this document is that the project’s impacts have been considered in previous CEQA documents (i.e., the 2018 INSP EIR and 2020 INSP SEIR) that were certified by the City of Livermore and deemed a sufficient and adequate analysis of the environmental impacts of the INSP. The discussion concludes that the conditions set forth in Section 15162 are not triggered by the proposed project. As such, a 15182 Checklist is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed project, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182.

C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following provides a description of the project site’s current location and setting, as well as the proposed project components and the discretionary actions required for the project.

Project Location and Setting
The project site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive in the City of Livermore, California (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). The approximately 13-acre site (APNs 905-0015-008, -026, -027, -028, and -029) is generally undeveloped and currently contains trees and grassland. Collier Creek and its associated riparian corridor run from the northeast corner of the site to the southwest corner and serves as the site’s western property boundary. The northernmost portion of the project site (APN 905-0015-008) was previously developed with a single-family residence, which was demolished in 2019; three existing wells are located on-site. An east/west private dirt pedestrian walkway bisects the site, and two private gravel roadways extend into the project site from the southwestern site corner. The first roadway proceeds along the western site boundary, immediately east of the Collier Creek corridor.

The second roadway bisects the southern half of the site, from southwest to northeast. The topography of the site is relatively flat, with elevations ranging from approximately 415 to 435 feet above mean sea level (amsl).

Surrounding existing land uses include undeveloped land and the Livermore Zone 7 Water Agency office building to the north; manufacturing facilities and a business park to the east, across Collier Canyon Road; I-580, undeveloped land, and auto dealerships to the south; and vacant land, a business park, the Alameda County Social Services Agency, Livermore Social Services office, a

EXHIBIT B
280
senior care center, and Costco to the west. In addition, Isabel Station, the future site of Phase I of the Valley Link Rail Project, is located 0.41-mile east of the project site. The project site is located within INSP Subarea 2d. The INSP designates the site as Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space, and the site is zoned INSP.

Project Components
The proposed project would include the subdivision of the project site into 13 non-residential parcels (Parcels A through M) and a total of 22 lots for residential uses. A total of 253 residential units, 2.53 acres of public park, and 2.42 acres of private open space area would be provided as part of the project.

Lots 1 through 21 would be developed with 21 three-story residential buildings comprised of six affordable and 137 market-rate townhomes. The affordable townhome units would include three 922-sf one-bedroom units and three 1,311-sf two-bedroom units. The market-rate townhome units would include 31 1,726-sf three-bedroom units, 67 1,844-sf four-bedroom units, and 39 2,004-sf four-bedroom units. Each unit would include a one- or two-car garage, a porch, and a deck. The maximum building height of the townhome buildings would be 40 feet and two inches. On-site amenities for the townhome residents would be located within Parcel J on the northern portion of the site and would include a 0.4-acre pocket park, a turf activity area, community garden, and picnic area with shade structure and tables.

Lot 22 would be developed with a five-story apartment complex with 110 residential units, 108 of which would be affordable, and two of which would be market-rate manager units. The units would be a mix of 411-sf studios, 547-sf one-bedroom units, 796-sf two-bedroom units, and 1,079-sf three-bedroom units. The affordable residential units would be deed-restricted and required to meet the income category criteria pursuant to Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918.

The complex would include a 32,745-sf first-level podium parking garage with up to 104 vehicle stalls, and storage for 48 bicycles for residents and six bicycles for guests. The maximum building height of the five-story building would be 61 feet and one inch, with a few architectural features that would be up to 71 feet. On-site amenities for the apartment residents would include a children’s playground area, community garden, two outdoor picnic areas, and a dog run.

A 2.53-acre public park would be developed on Parcel M on the southern portion of the site and would include a multi-purpose lawn, a water treatment garden, a picnic area with tables and shade structure, paths, trees, and a children’s playground (see Figure 4).

Parcels J, K, and L would include a total of 2.42 acres of open space uses. Parcel J, located in the northwestern portion of the project site, would serve as an approximately 0.4-acre pocket park. Parcel K, located along the eastern site boundary, adjacent to Collier Canyon Road, would include approximately 0.42-acre of landscaping and open space, and includes existing easements for public utilities and a new water well. Parcel L, located along the western boundary of the project site, would also serve as an approximately 1.61-acre conservation easement and would include a 0.61-acre linear park/trail and a new pedestrian and bicycle path.

The project would require City approval of a Vesting Tentative Map, Site Plan Design Review, and Consistency Determination. Pursuant to Livermore Development Code Section 4.02.080, the proposed project would also require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for grading activities within 150 feet of the top of the Collier Creek bank. In addition, as allowed under State Density Bonus Law, the project applicant is requesting waivers and concessions to the City of Livermore development standards.

EXHIBIT B
281
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map

EXHIBIT B
282
Figure 2
Project Site Boundaries

EXHIBIT B
283
Figure 3
Preliminary Site Plan

EXHIBIT B
284
Figure 4
Conceptual Parcel M Park Design

EXHIBIT B
285
Vesting Tentative Map
The Vesting Tentative Map would subdivide the project site into 13 parcels (see Figure 5). Parcels A through I would include a total of 2.06 acres of private streets.

Parcels J through L would include a total of 2.42 acres of private open space. Parcel M would include a total of 2.53 acres of public park. Lots 1 through 21 would range in size from 0.17-acre to 0.29-acre, and include a total of 4.42 acres of townhome residential uses. Lot 22 would include a total of 1.66 acres of affordable apartment residential uses.

Below is additional detail regarding the site access and circulation, landscaping, utility infrastructure, and off-site improvements.

Site Access and Circulation, and Roadway Improvements
Parcels A through I would include a total of 2.06 acres of private roadways. Site access would be provided by a new internal roadway system that would connect to two new 26-foot wide driveway entrances from Collier Canyon Road along the eastern site boundary. The internal roadway system would form a grid pattern, with A Street and B Street running north-south, and C Street through H Street running east-west. All roadways would be 26 feet wide. Four- and five-foot wide sidewalks would be provided along all internal roadways.

Each unit within Lots 1 through 21 would include a one-or two-car garage, for a total of 283 garage parking spaces. The townhome portion of the proposed project would also include 19 uncovered guest parking spaces, one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant guest parking space, for a total of 303 parking spaces. A total of 36 visitor bicycle stalls would be provided for the townhomes. The affordable housing complex within Lot 22 would include a first-level podium parking garage with 87 covered stalls and 17 uncovered stalls, for a total of 104 vehicle stalls, and storage for 48 bicycles for residents and six bicycles for guests.

As discussed above, Parcel L would serve as a 1.61-acre conservation easement and would include a 0.61-acre linear park/trail and a new pedestrian and bicycle path. The new path would run adjacent to Collier Creek and would connect to the sidewalks on Collier Canyon Road and Constitution Drive. New five-foot wide sidewalks would be included intermittently along the internal roadways.

Landscaping
All on-site trees would be removed as part of the proposed project; however, as shown in Figure 5 Vesting Tentative Map

EXHIBIT B
286

EXHIBIT B
287
Figure 6, an assortment of shade trees, accent trees, and native tree species would be planted throughout the project site. In addition, a variety of groundcover and grasses would be planted throughout the project site. All landscaping improvements would be consistent with Section 13.25 of the Municipal Code, Water Efficient Landscape, and would be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system.

Utilities
Water and sewer service for the proposed development would be provided through connections to existing City infrastructure located in the site vicinity (see Figure 7). The proposed project would include installation of new eight-inch water lines throughout the project site. The water system within the project site would connect to an existing 14-inch water main within Collier Canyon Road.

EXHIBIT B
288
Figure 5
Vesting Tentative Map

EXHIBIT B
289
Figure 6
Landscaping Plan

EXHIBIT B
290
Figure 7
Preliminary Utility Plan

EXHIBIT B
291
The proposed project would also include construction of new eight-inch sanitary sewer lines and sanitary sewer manholes throughout the project site, which would then direct wastewater to the existing 15-inch sanitary sewer main within Collier Canyon Road.

A Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan has been prepared for the proposed project (see Figure 8). In compliance with C.3 stormwater guidelines, the drainage design would provide quality treatment for 10 percent equivalent impervious surface area.

The proposed stormwater design would comply with the City’s Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) using the guidelines provided in the Clean Water Program’s C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance Manual. In order to manage and treat stormwater, the project site would be divided into various Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) to collect and convey stormwater to the various on-site Low Impact Development (LID) treatment features, including LID measures located in Parcel M. Once stormwater has passed through the LID treatment measure, the stormwater would be conveyed to the City’s existing storm drain system in either Collier Canyon Road or Constitution Drive. Hydromodification measures would be implemented as required by the MRP utilizing the Alameda County Clean Water Program’s C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance Manual.

Requested Entitlements
The proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Livermore:
• Approval of a Vesting Tentative Map;
• Approval of State Density Bonus Law waivers and concessions; • Site Plan and Design Review;
• Conditional Use Permit; and
• Consistency Determination.

EXHIBIT B
292
Figure 8
Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan

EXHIBIT B
293
D. SOURCES
The following documents are referenced information sources used for the purpose of this Initial Study/15182 Checklist:

1. Alameda County Community Development Agency. Livermore Executive Airport Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. August 2012.

2. Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program. C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance.

February 8, 2021.

3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May 2017.

4. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CEQA Thresholds and Guidelines Update.

Available at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-qualityact-ceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines. Accessed March 2023.

5. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts From Land Use Projects and Plans. April 2022.

6. CalEPA. Cortese List Data Resources. Available at:
https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/. Accessed October 2024.

7. California Building Standards Commission. 2022 California Green Building Standards Code. 2023.

8. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Alameda County, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. September 3, 2006.

9. California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System.

Available at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8 e8057116f1aacaa. Accessed March 2023.

10. City of Dublin, City of Livermore, City of Pleasanton, Dublin San Ramon Services District.

Tri-Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. January 2024.

11. City of Livermore. Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trails Active Transportation Plan. June 11, 2018.

12. City of Livermore. City of Livermore General Plan 2003-2025. Amended December 2014.

13. City of Livermore. Design Standards and Guidelines. Adopted June 28, 2004.

14. City of Livermore. Emergency Operations Plan. January 2018.

15. City of Livermore. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan [pg. 2-33]. Amended November 2022.

16. Cornerstone Earth Group. Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations Cornerstone Church and Chu Properties Livermore, California.

October 25, 2022.

17. Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Vasco Road Landfill, Application for Solid Waste Facility Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements. October 31, 2018.

18. Department of Water Resources. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act 2018 Basin Prioritization [Table A-1]. January 2019.

19. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map 06001C0333G.

Effective August 2, 2009.

20. Fehr & Peers. Cornerstone Church and Chu Property Residential Development – Transportation Assessment. January 11, 2023.

21. Governor’s Office and Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. December 2018.

22. Johnson Marigot Consulting. Brief Biological Constraints Analysis for the Collier Canyon Parcels – Alameda County, California. January 2020.

23. Johnson Marigot Consulting, LLC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Aquatic Resource Delineation Report Collier Canyon Parcels Project Alameda County, California. March 2022.

EXHIBIT B
294

24. KCE Matrix. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment – Vacant Land Client Project Identification: Constitution Drive (APNs: 905-0015-008, 905-0015-026, 905-0015-027, 905-0015-028 & 905-0015-029) 2620 & 2768 Collier Canyon Road Livermore, California 94551. February 1, 2023.

25. Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority. 30R Dublin-Livermore via Las Positas College. August 10, 2024.

26. Native American Heritage Commission. Cornerstone Townhomes Project, Alameda County. July 30, 2024.

27. Tom Origer & Associates. Cultural Resources Study for the Cornerstone Townhomes Project Livermore, Alameda County, California. August 13, 2024.

28. U.S. Census Bureau. Quick Facts, City of Livermore, California. Available at:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/livermorecitycalifornia. Accessed October 2024.

29. Zone 7 Water Agency. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan [pg. 6-7]. March 31, 2016.

30. Zone 7 Water Agency. Groundwater Management Plan for Livermore-Amador Valley Groundwater Basin. September 2005.

E. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
On the basis of the following Initial Study/15182 Checklist, the City has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the 2018 INSP EIR and/or the 2020 INSP SEIR. All project impacts have been determined to be less than significant, or can be mitigated to a less-thansignificant level given required compliance with mitigation measures specified by the 2018 INSP EIR and/or 2020 INSP SEIR. Therefore, none of the environmental factors below are significantly affected.
 Aesthetics  Agriculture and Forest
Resources
 Air Quality
 Biological Resources  Cultural Resources  Energy
 Geology and Soils  Greenhouse Gas Emissions  Hazards and Hazardous Materials  Hydrology and Water
Quality
 Land Use and Planning  Mineral Resources
 Noise  Population and Housing  Public Services
 Recreation  Transportation  Tribal Cultural Resources  Utilities and Service
Systems
 Wildfire  Mandatory Findings of
Significance

EXHIBIT B
295
F. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this Addendum:
 I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
 I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
 I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
 I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date
Steve Riley, Planning Manager City of Livermore
Printed Name For

EXHIBIT B
296
G. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The purpose of the comparison is to evaluate the categories in terms of any “changes” or “new information” that may result in a changed environmental impact evaluation. A “no” answer does not necessarily mean that potential impacts do not exist relative to the environmental category, but that a relevant change would not occur in the condition or status of the impact due to its insignificance or its treatment in a previous environmental document. The following impact evaluation categories will be used to evaluate the proposed project as compared to the INSP EIR and SEIR:

Explanation Of Impact Evaluation Categories
This section describes the organization of the sections for each CEQA Appendix G environmental resource area included in this Initial Study/15182 Checklist.

Where Impact Was Analyzed in the Previous CEQA Documents: This column provides a reference to the page(s) of the INSP EIR and SEIR where information and analysis may be found relative to the environmental issue listed under each topic.

Do Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether the changes represented by the current project would result in new significant impacts that have not already been considered and mitigated by a previous EIR or that substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact. If a “yes” answer is given and new or more severe significant impacts are specified, additional mitigations will be specified in the discussion section including a statement of impact status after mitigation.

Any New Circumstances Involving New or More Severe Impacts? Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether there have been changes to the project site or the vicinity (environmental setting) that have occurred subsequent to the certification of an EIR, which would result in the current project having significant impacts that were not considered or mitigated by that EIR or which substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact.

Any New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(3)(AD) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous environmental documents were certified as complete is available, requiring an update to the analysis of the previous environmental documents to verify that the environmental conclusions and mitigation measures remain valid. If the new information shows that: (A) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the prior environmental documents; or (B) that significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the prior environmental documents; or (C) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects or the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the prior environmental documents would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, the question would be answered ‘Yes’ requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or supplement to the EIR. However, if the additional analysis completed as part of this Environmental Checklist Review finds that the conclusions of the prior environmental documents remain the same and no new significant impacts are identified, or identified significant environmental impacts are not found to be

EXHIBIT B
297
substantially more severe, the question would be answered ‘No’ and no additional EIR documentation (supplement to the EIR or subsequent EIR) would be required.

Prior Mitigation Measures
Applicable mitigation measures from the previous CEQA document(s) that apply to the changes or new information are referenced under each environmental category. These mitigation measures follow the numbering scheme of the INSP EIR and SEIR.

EXHIBIT B
298
I. AESTHETICS.

Would the project:

Where Impact Was
Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.5-8 to

3.5-10
No No No
b. Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a State scenic
highway?
2018 EIR pg.

3.5-14 No No No
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character
or quality of public views of the site
and its surroundings? (Public views
are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If
the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
2018 EIR pg.

3.5-14 to 3.5-
15 No No No
d. Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
2018 EIR pg.

3.5-15 No No No
Discussion
a,c. Examples of typical scenic vistas include mountain ranges, ridgelines, or bodies of water as viewed from a highway, public space, or other area designated for the express purpose of viewing and sightseeing. In general, a project’s impact to a scenic vista would occur if development of the project would substantially change or remove a scenic vista. The City’s General Plan identifies a number of roadways within the Planning Area that are considered scenic routes. Scenic routes are designated as such because they pass through areas of high scenic value or provide access to important scenic, recreational, cultural, or historic points.3 Scenic routes identified in the project vicinity include I-580, Doolan Road, and Isabel Avenue. In addition, the General Plan identifies specific scenic vista points throughout the City. Figure 4-1 of the City’s General Plan identifies the area looking south from I-580 towards the Las Positas Golf Course as a scenic vista. Figure 2-6 of the INSP includes a scenic viewpoint from I-580 looking northwest toward the project site. As noted therein, the existing riparian corridor of Collier Canyon Creek creates a natural viewshed in the area. Development along the creek is subject to existing Scenic Corridor policies to ensure views of the ridge-lines. According to the INSP, the public park component of the proposed project, located adjacent to Collier Canyon Creek, would enhance the views of ridgelines along the segment of I-580 adjacent to the project site.4 As discussed in the ISNP, the project site is subject to existing General Plan Scenic Corridor policies and maximum building height development standards. The Scenic Corridor policy protects key views of the hills from I-580 within the Planning Area. The stretch of freeway through the City is divided into subareas, each with a set of policies that limit building heights. For Subarea 2d, buildings are limited to heights of 50 feet above 3 City of Livermore. City of Livermore General Plan 2003-2025. Amended December 2014. 4 City of Livermore. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan [pg. 2-33]. Amended November 2022.

EXHIBIT B
299
existing grade or the Scenic Corridor limit, whichever is stricter. The townhome component of the proposed project would be constructed with a maximum building height of 40 feet and two inches, which would be below the 50 feet but would exceed the Scenic Corridor height limit set forth in the INSP by approximately 22 feet. The affordable apartment complex component of the proposed project would result in a maximum building height of 61 feet and one inch (with a few architectural features up to 71 feet), which is greater than 50 feet and would exceed the Scenic Corridor height limit set forth in the INSP by approximately 10 feet. However, as allowed under State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918), the project applicant is requesting waivers and concessions to exceed the Performance Measure maximum building height. With the exception of the requested waivers and concessions allowed under the State Density Bonus Law, the proposed project would otherwise meet the development standards set forth for the site.

Most subareas within the INSP area establish a “view angle” below which buildings must be located. The view angle runs perpendicular (90 degrees) from the freeway and starts four feet above the outermost lane of the I-580 freeway as of 2008. In addition to building height limits, the Scenic Corridor Policy also limits ground contour changes.

The 2018 INSP EIR concluded that a significant and unavoidable impact would occur related to scenic vistas. The project site is not located within an area identified in the INSP for amendments to the I-580 Scenic Corridor policies; thus, the proposed project would normally need to comply with all applicable I-580 Scenic Corridor policies. However as stated earlier, the applicant is requesting the use of Density Bonus waivers and concessions to exceed the INSP height limitations for this project.

In addition, the 2018 INSP EIR evaluated the potential for development of the INSP area to degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. As discussed therein, the INSP would enhance the visual character of the existing area with well-designed urban development through compliance with the INSP development standards and guidelines related to building height, setbacks, architecture, and landscaping. Thus, impacts were determined to be less than significant.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts related to scenic vistas or substantial degradation of visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. The project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. However, development of the townhomes and public park component of the proposed project would be subject to Site Plan and Design Review pursuant to Section 9.07.020 of the City’s Development Code. Chapter 9.07 of the City’s Development Code specifies that the purpose of Site Plan and Design Review “is to provide a process for the appropriate review of construction and development projects.” As part of the design review process, the project would be reviewed for conformance with the City of Livermore INSP and Citywide Design Standards and Guidelines, which include provisions related to architectural design, landscaping, exterior materials, and compatibility with existing uses.5 Compliance with such would ensure consistency with all applicable policies and guidelines related to visual resources in the project vicinity. With respect to the affordable apartments component of the proposed project, as discussed above, the project applicant is requesting waivers and concessions to exceed the Performance Measure maximum building height, as allowed under State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Sections 5 City of Livermore. Design Standards and Guidelines. Adopted June 28, 2004.

EXHIBIT B
300
65915 through 65918). All required development standards would be met, upon approval from the City of Livermore of State Density Bonus Law waivers and concessions, and all design requirements would be fulfilled. Given that State law supersedes local ordinance, the proposed project’s use of State Density Bonus Law to waive the INSP Scenic Corridor Policy requirements related to building height and setback requirements does not result in a Specific Plan inconsistency.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.
b. According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, the project site is not located within the vicinity of an officially designated State Scenic Highway.6 I-580, located south
of the project site, is an Eligible State Scenic Highway, but has not been officially designated. The 2018 INSP EIR determined that implementation of the INSP and associated General Plan amendments would not result in a significant impact to scenic vistas along I-580. Based on the above information, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the conclusions of the INSP 2018 EIR.
d. Due to the undeveloped nature of the project site, existing sources of light and glare do not currently exist within the site. However, the 2018 INSP EIR determined that a number of existing light sources are located within the INSP Planning Area, including street lights, buildings, and vehicles.

Development of the project site with residential uses, park uses, and internal roadways would involve sources of light and glare associated with interior light spilling through windows, vehicle headlights entering and exiting the project site, exterior lighting on the proposed structure, and associated with the internal drive aisles, and light reflected off windows. However, the INSP identifies the 13-acre project site as Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space, which assumes the development of a residential uses. As a result, such sources of light and glare would be consistent with the type of lighting anticipated for the project site.

The Livermore General Plan contains policies for controlling outdoor artificial light, including Objective LU-6.1 Policy 3, and Chapter 15.18 of the Livermore Municipal Code includes lighting regulations for residential areas. The 2018 EIR concluded that compliance with the aforementioned policies would reduce potentially significant long-term light and glare impacts, and INSP design standards would further help to ensure that lighting for new development is held to high design standards for light pollution and glare reduction. Specifically, INSP DS-90 requires lighting to be designed and shielded to direct light downward to minimize glare onto adjacent areas, avoid light impact to upper story living spaces, and minimize night-sky light pollution.

Furthermore, through the City’s Site Plan and Design Review process, the proposed project would be reviewed for consistency with the City’s Design Standards and 6 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa.

Accessed March 2023.

EXHIBIT B
301
Guidelines.7 Section F, Lighting, of Chapter 4 of the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines contains specific restrictions to ensure that the design of fixtures and the light provided contributes to the character of development and does not adversely affect adjacent development. Pursuant to Section 5.1.1 of the Guidelines, area lighting should be designed so as to avoid light being directed off-site. In addition, Section 2.1.4 states that lighting should be directed downward to avoid lighting of the night sky. Compliance with the foregoing sections of the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines and INSP would ensure that lighting from the proposed project would not be directed off-site, and would not adversely affect the business park development around the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
None Required.
7 City of Livermore. Design Standards and Guidelines. Adopted June 28, 2004.

EXHIBIT B
302
II. AGRICULTURE AND
FORESTRY RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.14-6
to 3.14-7
No No No
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.14-7 No No No
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code
section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.15-1 No No No
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.15-1 No No No
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could individually or
cumulatively result in loss of Farmland
to non-agricultural use?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.14-8 No No No
Discussion
a. Active agricultural land use accounts for approximately two percent of the INSP existing land use. Areas of Prime and Unique Farmland are located along East Airway Boulevard, and areas of Unique Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Important are located along the northwestern edge of the Planning Area, at the northern end of Constitution Drive and the northernmost portion of the lands designated as Business Park and Residential Transition under the INSP.

Overall, the 2018 INSP EIR determined that buildout of the INSP would result in the full conversion and loss of this Prime Farmland. INSP Policies P-LU-21 through -24 would reduce the significant impact by requiring compensatory mitigation. However, as full implementation of the INSP would rely on the conversion of the Prime Farmland on the Gandolfo property to non-agricultural use, mitigation is not available that would reduce impacts to a level that is less than significant, and the impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable.

Currently, the project site is generally undeveloped and contains trees and grassland. The site is largely characterized by ruderal habitat. According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared for the proposed project, the project site was previously used for agriculture until at least 1982. However, as shown in Figure 3.14-1 of the 2018 INSP EIR, the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program designates the project site as Urban and Built-Up Land. Prime Farmland is not

EXHIBIT B
303
mapped on-site. Urban and Built-up Land is used for residential, industrial, commercial, institutional, and other developed purposes. Therefore, the proposed project would not involve conversion of Farmland, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping Program of the California Resources Agency or identified in the 2018 INSP EIR, to non-agricultural use.

Based on the above, the currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.
b. According to the 2018 INSP EIR, existing Williamson Act contracts are not located within the INSP planning area at the time the 2018 INSP EIR was drafted. However, one zoning district, PDR-01-001, in the INSP area allows for agriculture uses. The INSP designated both parcels as Transition Residential, which does not allow for agricultural uses. Thus, the 2018 INSP EIR determined that a significant and unavoidable impact related to zoning for agricultural use would occur, and mitigation measures that would reduce the impact to a less than significant level do not exist.

None of the land within the project site is currently held under Williamson Act contracts.

Additionally, the project site is designated INSP Subarea 2d and is zoned INSP. The site is not zoned for agricultural use. Furthermore, according to the Specific Plan, the City has designated the site for residential and open space uses. Therefore, buildout of the proposed project would not conflict with agricultural zoning. As such, the currently proposed project would have no impacts related to conflicts with a Williamson Act contract or agricultural zoning.

Based on the above, the currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.
c,d. The 2018 INSP EIR determined that the Planning Area does not have forest resources or land zoned for forest use, and the INSP would have no impact on forest resources. The project site is not considered forest land (as defined in PRC section 12220[g]), timberland (as defined by PRC section 4526), and is not zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104[g]). As noted above, the project site is currently zoned INSP. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact with regard to conversion of forest land or any potential conflict with forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production zoning. The currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
None Required.

EXHIBIT B
304
III.AIR QUALITY.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.3-20
to 3.3-32
2020 SEIR
pgs. 3.1-22
to 3.1-43
No No No
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.3-33
to 3.3-43
2020 SEIR
pgs. 3.1-43
to 3.1-45
No No No
c. Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.3-44
2020 SEIR
pgs. 3.1-45
to 3.1-50
No No No
d. Result in other emissions (such as
those leading to odors) adversely
affecting a substantial number of
people?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.3-46
to 3.3-47
2020 SEIR
pgs. 3.1-50
to 3.1-52
No No No
Discussion
a,b. The City of Livermore is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The 2020 INSP SEIR assessed the potential for the INSP to conflict with the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan and determined that the INSP could result in conflicting population and employment growth. However, per capita emissions in the INSP area in 2040 would be lower than forecasted under the 2017 Clean Air Plan, as the 2017 Clean Air Plan would not have assumed the sustainability policies and transit-oriented development patterns that would be implemented under the INSP, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. The currently proposed project would be consistent with the project site’s INSP land use designation and would adhere to all applicable INSP policies. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

The 2020 INSP SEIR assessed the potential for buildout of the INSP to result in impacts related to the generation of temporary, short-term construction-related emissions of criteria air pollutants, and the generation of long-term operational emissions of criteria pollutants. According to the 2020 INSP SEIR, construction emissions generated in the INSP area by implementation of the INSP would result in a potentially significant impact on air quality. INSP Policy PENV-15 requires the use of Tier 4 engines for off-road equipment to reduce Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and particulate matter (PM) exhaust emission levels and use of low volatile organic compound (VOC) paints to reduce Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG) emission levels during construction activities. Additionally, INSP Policy PENV-14 requires construction projects to implement best management practices (BMPs) as recommended by the BAAQMD to reduce fugitive dust emissions. Thus, the implementation of BMPs under Policies P-ENV14 and P-ENV-15 would reduce fugitive

EXHIBIT B
305
PM 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) and particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) emissions to less-than-significant levels.

However, with respect to ROG, NOX and PM10 and PM2.5 exhaust emissions, the INSP EIR determined that construction activity for an individual development project, or a combination of projects, could result in the generation of pollutant emissions that exceed the respective BAAQMD significance thresholds (see Table 1) Table 1
BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant
Construction Operational
Average Daily
Emissions
(lbs/day)
Average Daily
Emissions
(lbs/day)
Maximum Annual
Emissions
(tons/year)
ROG 54 54 10
NOx 54 54 10
PM10 82 (exhaust only) 82 15
PM2.5 54 (exhaust only) 54 10
Source: BAAQMD, CEQA Guidelines, May 2017.

To ensure impacts related to construction emissions would be less than significant, the 2020 INSP SEIR included Mitigation Measures AQ-1, AQ-2, and AQ-3, which require offroad equipment to utilize renewable diesel; all on-road diesel trucks used for construction activities to have 2010 model year or newer engines; and the City shall track all land use development construction activities occurring in the INSP area, assess and determine the estimated total emissions for all construction activities that would be concurrently ongoing, and determine the mitigation fees for each development project to pay on a pro rata basis to BAAQMD to offset their pollutant emissions as necessary such that daily pollutant thresholds would not be exceeded. The 2020 INSP SEIR concluded that with implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures, impacts related to construction emissions would be less than significant.

With regard to operational emissions, based on the emissions presented in Table 3.1-7 of the 2020 INSP SEIR, the SEIR determined that INSP generated automobile traffic would incrementally increase air pollutant emissions in the region beyond the applicable BAAOMD thresholds of significance for PM10 and PM2.5. The 2020 INSP SEIR included Mitigation Measure GHG-1, which establishes strategies to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). However, the 2020 INSP SEIR concluded that Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would not reduce emissions of PM10 to below the applicable threshold. Therefore, impacts on regional air quality were determined to remain significant and unavoidable.

The SFBAAB area is currently designated as a nonattainment area for the State and federal ozone, State and federal PM2.5, and State respirable PM10 ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The SFBAAB is designated attainment or unclassified for all other AAQS. It should be noted that on January 9, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued a final rule to determine that the Bay Area has attained the 24- hour PM2.5 federal AAQS. Nonetheless, the Bay Area must continue to be designated as nonattainment for the federal PM2.5 AAQS until such time as the BAAQMD submits a redesignation request and a maintenance plan to the USEPA, and the USEPA approves the proposed redesignation. The USEPA has not yet approved a request for redesignation of the SFBAAB; therefore, the SFBAAB remains in nonattainment for 24-hour PM2.5.

EXHIBIT B
306
In compliance with regulations, due to the nonattainment designations of the area, the BAAQMD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the AAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions through regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies. The current air quality plans are prepared in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

The most recent federal ozone plan is the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan, which was adopted on October 24, 2001 and approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on November 1, 2001. The plan was submitted to the USEPA on November 30, 2001 for review and approval. The most recent State ozone plan is the 2017 Clean Air Plan, adopted on April 19, 2017. The 2017 Clean Air Plan was developed as a multi-pollutant plan that provides an integrated control strategy to reduce ozone, PM, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Although a plan for achieving the State PM10 standard is not required, the BAAQMD has prioritized measures to reduce PM in developing the control strategy for the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The control strategy serves as the backbone of the BAAQMD’s current PM control program.

The aforementioned air quality plans contain mobile source controls, stationary source controls, and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the State and federal AAQS within the SFBAAB. Adopted BAAQMD rules and regulations, as well as the thresholds of significance, have been developed with the intent to ensure continued attainment of AAQS, or to work towards attainment of AAQS for which the area is currently designated nonattainment, consistent with applicable air quality plans. The BAAQMD’s established significance thresholds associated with development projects for emissions of the ozone precursors ROG and NOX, as well as for PM10, and PM2.5, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day) and tons per year (tons/yr), are listed above in Table 1.

By exceeding the BAAQMD’s mass emission thresholds for operational emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10, or PM2.5, a project would be considered to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the BAAQMD’s air quality planning efforts.

Particulate matter can be split into two categories: fugitive and exhaust. The BAAQMD thresholds of significance for exhaust are presented in Table 1. BAAQMD does not maintain quantitative thresholds for fugitive emissions of PM10 or PM2.5, rather, BAAQMD requires all projects within the district’s jurisdiction to implement Basic Construction Mitigation Measures (BCMMs) related to dust suppression.

In order to compare the proposed project’s emissions to the most recent BAAQMD thresholds, air quality modeling was conducted for the proposed project. The proposed project’s construction and operational emissions were quantified using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) web-based version 2022.1.1.26 – a statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify air quality emissions, including GHG emissions, from land use projects. The model applies inherent default values for various land uses, including construction data, trip generation rates, vehicle mix, trip length, average speed, compliance with the California Building Standards Code (CBSC), etc.

Where project-specific information is available, such information is applied in the model.

For the proposed project, project-specific trip generation rates provided by Fehr & Peers

EXHIBIT B
307
were input into the model,8 as well as information related to the anticipated construction schedule for the proposed project. In addition, the modeling assumed that the grading phase of construction would require the import of approximately 19,500 cubic yards (CY) of material and removal of approximately 11,200 CY of material from the site. All CalEEMod results are included as Appendix A to this Initial Study/15182 Checklist.

The proposed project’s estimated emissions associated with construction and operations are presented and discussed in further detail below. A discussion of the proposed project’s contribution to cumulative air quality conditions is provided below as well.

Construction Emissions
According to the CalEEMod results, the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated construction criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 2. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s construction emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance for ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5.

Table 2
Maximum Unmitigated Construction Emissions (lbs/day)
Pollutant
Proposed Project
Emissions
Threshold of
Significance
Exceeds
Threshold?
ROG 11.1 54 NO
NOX 51.4 54 YES
PM10* 1.57 82 NO
PM2.5* 1.47 54 NO
Note:
* Denotes emissions from exhaust only. BAAQMD has not yet adopted PM thresholds for fugitive emissions.

Source: CalEEMod, October 2024 (see Appendix A).

All projects under the jurisdiction of the BAAQMD are required to implement all of the BAAQMD’s BCMMs, which include the following:

1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.

2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.

3. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.

4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.

5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.

6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
8 Fehr & Peers. Cornerstone Church and Chu Property Residential Development – Transportation Assessment.

January 11, 2023.

EXHIBIT B
308

7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator.

8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

The proposed project’s required implementation of the BAAQMD’s BCMMs listed above would further reduce the construction-related emissions.

Based on the above, impacts related to construction-generated criteria air pollutant emissions of would be less-than-significant.

Operational Emissions
According to the CalEEMod results, the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated operational criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 3. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s operational emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance.

Because the proposed project’s operational emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance, the proposed project would not be considered to result in a potentially significant air quality impact during operations. It should also be noted that because Mitigation Measure GHG-1 of the 2020 INSP SEIR establishes measures for individual development projects, Mitigation Measure GHG-1 of the 2020 INSP SEIR would still be applicable to the proposed project.

Table 3
Unmitigated Maximum Operational Emissions
Pollutant
Proposed Project
Emissions
Threshold of
Significance Exceeds
lbs/day tons/yr lbs/day tons/yr Threshold?
ROG 17.8 3.07 54 10 NO
NOX 4.98 0.96 54 10 NO
PM10* 0.17 0.03 82 15 NO
PM2.5* 0.17 0.03 54 10 NO
Note:
* Denotes emissions from exhaust only. BAAQMD has not yet adopted PM thresholds for fugitive emissions.

Source: CalEEMod, October 2024 (see Appendix A).

Cumulative Emissions
Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. A single project is not sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, BAAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. The thresholds of significance presented in Table 1 represent the levels at which a project’s

EXHIBIT B
309
individual emissions of criteria air pollutants or precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SFBAAB’s existing air quality conditions. If a project exceeds the significance thresholds presented in Table 1, the proposed project’s emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse cumulative air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions. The proposed project would be below all applicable thresholds for criteria pollutants during both construction and operation. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with additional 2020 INSP SEIR Mitigation Measures AQ-1, AQ-2, and AQ-3, as presented below, which would ensure all impacts related to construction-generated criteria air pollutant emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5 would be reduced.

Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts related to exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations than were analyzed in the 2020 INSP SEIR. Therefore, the proposed project remains consistent with the conclusions of the 2020 INSP SEIR. c. The major pollutant concentrations of concern are toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions and localized CO emissions, which are addressed in further detail below.

TAC Emissions
Another category of environmental concern is TACs. The CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (Handbook) provides recommended setback distances for sensitive land uses from major sources of TACs, including, but not limited to, freeways and high traffic roads, distribution centers, and rail yards. The CARB has identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel-fueled engines as a TAC; thus, high volume freeways, stationary diesel engines, and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic are identified as having the highest associated health risks from DPM. Health risks from TACs are a function of both the concentration of emissions and the duration of exposure. Health-related risks associated with DPM in particular are primarily associated with long-term exposure and associated risk of contracting cancer.

The 2020 INSP SEIR determined that a significant and unavoidable impact would occur related to health impacts from TAC exposure due to increased vehicle traffic, potential installation or operation of new stationary sources of TACs, and construction activities.

The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is the Lily of the Valley Early Elementary and Preschool, located within the existing building to the west of the project site, at the southwest corner of North Canyons Parkway and Independence Drive. However, the nearest area proposed for on-site disturbance associated with project construction is located over 1,000 feet from the outdoor play areas associated with Lily of the Valley Early Elementary and Preschool. In addition, construction activities associated with the proposed project would be separated from nearby sensitive receptors by existing development and vegetation. Thus, Mitigation Measure AQ-4 of the 2020 INSP SEIR, which requires future projects located within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive receptors to perform a Construction Health Risk Assessment, would not be applicable to the proposed project.

The proposed residential units, public park, and open space associated with the proposed project would not involve any land uses or operations that would be considered major sources of TACs, including DPM. As such, the project would not generate any substantial pollutant concentrations during operations. Short-term, construction-related activities

EXHIBIT B
310
could result in the generation of TACs, specifically DPM, from on-road haul trucks and offroad equipment exhaust emissions. Construction is temporary and occurs over a relatively short duration in comparison to the operational lifetime of the proposed project. Health risks are typically associated with exposure to high concentrations of TACs over extended periods of time (e.g., 30 years or greater), whereas the construction period associated with the proposed project would likely be limited to approximately four years.

All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the In-Use OffRoad Diesel Vehicle Regulation, which is intended to help reduce emissions associated with off-road diesel vehicles and equipment, including DPM. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources. In addition, construction equipment would operate intermittently throughout the day and only on portions of the site at a time.

Because construction equipment on-site would not operate for long periods of time and would be used at varying locations within the site, associated emissions of DPM would not occur at the same location (or be evenly spread throughout the entire project site) for long periods of time. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, the potential for any one sensitive receptor in the area to be exposed to concentrations of pollutants for a substantially extended period of time would be low. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not be expected to expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts related to the exposure of sensitive receptors to operational emissions beyond what was analyzed in the 2020 INSP SEIR.

Localized CO Emissions
Emissions of CO result from the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels such as gasoline or wood and are particularly related to traffic levels. Localized concentrations of CO are related to the levels of traffic and congestion along streets and at intersections.

As older, more polluting vehicles are retired and replaced with newer, cleaner vehicles, the overall rate of emission of CO for vehicle fleets throughout the State has been and is expected to continue to decrease.

Under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a plan would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited by bridges or tunnels in order to generate a significant CO impact. According to the 2020 INSP SEIR, implementation of the INSP would increase traffic volumes at a single intersection up to 18,800 vehicles per day (North Canyons Parkway west of Gateway Drive), and would result in up to 27,965 vehicles per day where a road does not currently exist (Isabel Avenue south of Valley Link Parking Road/Access). Additionally, traffic volumes along segments of the I-580 within the INSP area would increase up to 29,282 vehicles per day under the INSP. Implementation of the INSP would increase peak hour AM and PM traffic volumes at a single intersection by less than 1,780 vehicles per hour and 2,111 vehicles per hour, respectively. In addition, implementation of the INSP was determined to significantly decrease daily operational emissions of CO from mobile sources, counteracting a slight increase in CO from area and energy sources in 2040. Therefore,

EXHIBIT B
311
the 2020 INSP SEIR concluded that impacts related to CO emissions would be less than significant.

As discussed throughout this Initial Study/15182 Checklist, the proposed project would be constructed within the footprint of the previously analyzed INSP. Moreover, the INSP identifies the project site as Residential Village, Residential Center, and Open Space, which assumed the development of residential and open space/park uses. As such, traffic generated by the proposed project, and associated CO emissions, were previously anticipated within the 2020 INSP SEIR.

Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts related to localized CO concentrations or other emissions from vehicles on roadways or intersections in the vicinity of the project site.

Conclusion
Based on the above information, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts related to exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations than were analyzed in the 2020 INSP SEIR. Therefore, the proposed project remains consistent with the conclusions of the 2020 INSP SEIR. d. Emissions of concern include those leading to odors, emission of dust, or emissions considered to constitute air pollutants. Air pollutants and emissions of dust have been discussed in sections “a” through “c” above. Therefore, the following discussion focuses on emissions of odors.

The 2020 INSP SEIR noted that while the INSP would include development of odorgenerating uses, such uses would be located only in areas zoned for industrial or manufacturing uses, which would minimize impacts associated with odor nuisance.

Furthermore, the INSP also contains Design Standard DS-37, which minimizes potential nuisances including odors from the siting of new uses next to existing uses, and DS-46, which promotes locating loading and service entrances such that noise and odor impacts on nearby uses would be minimized. Additionally, given mandatory compliance with BAAQMD rules, construction activities or materials are not proposed that would create a significant level of objectionable odors. Accordingly, the INSP concluded that odor impacts would be less than significant.

According to the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard.9 Manifestations of a person’s reaction to odors can range from psychological (e.g., irritation, anger, or anxiety) to physiological (e.g., circulatory and respiratory effects, nausea, vomiting, and headache). The presence of an odor impact is dependent on a number of variables including: the nature of the odor source; the frequency of odor generation; the intensity of odor; the distance of odor source to sensitive receptors; wind direction; and sensitivity of the receptor.

Due to the subjective nature of odor impacts, the number of variables that can influence the potential for an odor impact, and the variety of odor sources, quantitative analysis to determine the presence of a significant odor impact is difficult. Typical odor-generating 9 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines [pg. 7-1].

May 2017.

EXHIBIT B
312
land uses include, but are not limited to, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and composting facilities. The proposed project would not introduce any such land uses and is not located in the vicinity of any such existing or planned land uses.

Construction activities often include diesel-fueled equipment and heavy-duty trucks, which could create odors associated with diesel fumes that may be considered objectionable.

However, construction activities would be temporary, and hours of operation for construction equipment would be restricted per Section 9.36.080 of the Municipal Code.

Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources. The aforementioned regulations would help to minimize emissions, including emissions leading to odors. Accordingly, substantial objectionable odors would not be expected to occur during construction activities.

It should be noted that BAAQMD regulates objectionable odors through Regulation 7, Odorous Substances, which does not become applicable until the Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO) receives odor complaints from ten or more complainants within a 90-day period. Once effective, Regulation 7 places general limitation on odorous substances and specific emission limitations on certain odorous compounds, which remain effective until such time that citizen complaints have been received by the APCO for one year.

The limits of Regulation 7 become applicable again when the APCO receives odor complaints from five or more complainants within a 90-day period. Thus, although not anticipated, if odor complaints are made after the proposed project is developed, the BAAQMD would ensure that such odors are addressed and any potential odor effects reduced to less than significant.

As noted previously, all projects under the jurisdiction of BAAQMD are required to implement the BAAQMD’s BCMMs. The aforementioned measures would act to reduce construction-related dust by ensuring that haul trucks with loose material are covered, reducing vehicle dirt track-out, and limiting vehicle speeds within project site, among other methods, which would ensure that construction of the proposed project does not result in substantial emissions of dust. Following project construction, most areas of the project site would be paved or landscaped.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts related to exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations than were analyzed in the 2020 INSP SEIR. Therefore, the proposed project remains consistent with the conclusions of the 2020 INSP SEIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
As previously discussed, MM-AQ-4 would not be applicable to the proposed project. The following mitigation measure(s) from the 2020 INSP SEIR would apply to the proposed project, as well as MM-GHG-1 as presented in Section VIII, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this Initial Study/15182 Checklist:

MM-AQ-1: Require Construction Fleet to Use Renewable Diesel. All applicants proposing development of projects within the Planning Area shall require their contractors, as a condition of contract, to reduce construction-related exhaust emissions by ensuring that all off-road equipment operating for more than 20 total hours over the entire duration of construction activities shall operate on renewable diesel (such as Diesel high performance renewable). Renewable diesel is currently commercially available in San Francisco Bay Area.

EXHIBIT B
313
MM-AQ-2: Require Use of Diesel Trucks with 2010-Compliant Model Year Engines. All applicants proposing development of projects within the Planning Area shall require their contractors, as a condition of contract, to use diesel trucks that have 2010 model year or newer engines. In the event that 2010 model year or newer diesel trucks cannot be obtained, the contractor must provide documentation to the City showing that a good faith effort to locate such engines was conducted.

MM-AQ-3: Require Payment of Mitigation Fees to Offset Emissions Exceeding BAAQMD Daily Pollutant Thresholds.

This mitigation will either be conducted by the City through BAAQMD or by the City itself.

BAAQMD Mitigation Fee Approach
The City shall work with BAAQMD Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (OCII) to establish City-specific construction emissions offset guidance that can be implemented to assess, determine, and issue mitigation fees that project applicants would be required to pay BAAQMD on a pro rata basis for all concurrently ongoing construction projects in the Planning Area to offset all pollutant emissions exceeding BAAQMD’s daily pollutant thresholds. The offset fees will be paid into BAAQMD’s Bay Area Clean Air Foundation (Foundation) in an amount to be determined at the time of mitigation.

City Mitigation Fee Approach
If for any reason providing mitigation fees through BAAQMD is not pursued, then the City shall administer the mitigation funds directly for emissions reductions. The offset mitigation program shall follow the BAAQMD Guidance for Lead Agencies to Develop and Offset Mitigation Program (BAAQMD 2012). The offset fees with this approach will be paid into the City’s mitigation program in an amount to be determined at the time of mitigation. This mitigation (AQ-3) does not apply if builder contractor documents show they will not exceed BAAQMD/s daily pollutant thresholds.

This mitigation (AQ-3) does not apply if builder/contractor documents show they will not exceed BAAQMD’s daily pollutant threshold.

Specific Requirements
This mitigation includes the following specific requirements:
• For all construction projects occurring in the Planning Area, the applicants for each project shall require their construction contractors to estimate annual construction activity monitoring data for the following year. All applicants shall submit their estimated construction-related emissions to the City for review by November 1 of each year for the following construction year.
• The City shall review all received construction estimates to ensure they are representative, total the emissions estimates for all construction projects that had activities that would be ongoing during the following construction year, and determine the total mitigation fee that would need to be submitted to BAAQMD to fund offsets for the portion of annual emissions that exceed BAAQMD’s average daily thresholds for criteria pollutants. • In light of the total mitigation fee that was determined, and based on the construction emission amounts submitted by each applicant, the City shall appropriate the mitigation fee amount that would need to be submitted by each project applicant on a pro rata basis.

EXHIBIT B
314
The City shall issue the required mitigation fee amounts to each applicable project applicant.
• Upon receiving the City’s assigned mitigation fee amount, the applicants shall enter into a construction mitigation contract with BAAQMD to submit their apportioned mitigation fees or enter into an agreement with the City to submit their apportioned mitigation fees.

Examples of Potential Offset Actions
There are a wide range of feasible actions to offset emissions (through BAAQMD or the City) including, but not limited to, the following:
• Retrofitting and/or replacing heavy duty diesel engines and trucks (on or off road) with new, cleaner engines and trucks.
• Retrofitting stationary sources such as backup generators or boilers with new technologies that reduce emissions.
• Replacing diesel agriculture water pumps with alternative fuels. • Fund projects within a jurisdiction’s adopted bicycle/pedestrian plans. • Replace non-EPA wood burning devices with natural gas or EPA approved fireplaces. • Provide energy efficiency upgrades at residential, commercial, or government buildings. • Electrification of loading docks at distribution warehouses. • Install alternative energy supply on buildings.
• Replace older landscape maintenance equipment with newer, lower-emission equipment.

EXHIBIT B
315
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.7-26
to 3.7-35
No No No
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations
or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.7-35
to 3.7-37
No No No
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on
state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.7-37
to 3.7-39
No No No
d. Interfere substantially with the
movement of any resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with
established resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of wildlife
nursery sites?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.7-39 No No No
e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.7-40 No No No
f. Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Conservation Community Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.7-39 No No No
Discussion
a. The 2018 INSP EIR analyzed the potential for buildout of the INSP to substantially impact a candidate, sensitive, or special-status plant or wildlife species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). According to the 2018 INSP EIR, future development within the INSP area would have the potential to affect habitat suitable for a number of special-status species. Existing habitat within the INSP area includes California annual grassland, mixed willow riparian scrub, ruderal (e.g., vacant fields), seasonal wetlands, freshwater emergent wetlands, and aquatic riverine and drainage features, which represent suitable habitat for special-status species. Construction associated with future development in the Planning Area could affect special-status plant and wildlife species such as big-scale balsamroot, Congdon’s tarplant, prostrate vernal pool navarretia, Callippe silverspot butterfly, vernal pool fairy shrimp, California red-legged frog,

EXHIBIT B
316
California tiger salamander, western pond turtle, burrowing owl, loggerhead shrike, tricolored blackbird, white-tailed kite, American badger, hoary bat, and Townsend’s bigeared bat. The 2018 INSP EIR included MM-BIO-1, which requires a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan for special-status plant species, and MM-BIO-2 through -9, which requires avoidance of nesting birds, burrowing owl nesting, tricolored blackbird breeding habitat, western pond turtle, San Joaquin kit fox, American badger, California tiger salamander, California red-legged frog, Callippe silverspot butterfly, and roosting bats where feasible. Therefore, the 2018 INSP EIR concluded that with implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures and INSP polices, impacts to protected species would be less than significant.

The proposed project’s area of impact would be within the footprint of the previously analyzed INSP. As such, impacts to special-status species associated with the proposed project were previously anticipated within the 2018 INSP EIR. Nonetheless, to ensure that additional special-status species have not populated the project site since the 2018 INSP EIR was drafted, a Brief Biological Constraints Analysis was prepared for the proposed project by Johnson Marigot Consulting (see Appendix B).10 As part of the Brief Biological Constraints Analysis, a search of published records of special-status plant and wildlife species was conducted using the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The intent of the database review was to identify documented occurrences of special-status species in the vicinity of the project area, to determine their locations relative to the project site, and for use in the field assessment of habitats suitable for special-status species within the site. On November 22, 2019 a site visit was conducted to determine the potential for the project site to provide suitable habitat for special-status species and sensitive habitats. The results of the database searches and field survey are discussed below.

Special-Status Plants
As noted in the Brief Biological Constraints Analysis, a total of 10 records for specialstatus plant species have been documented within three miles of the site and/or within the same U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5’ topographic quadrangle (quad) as the project site (Livermore quad), including brittlescale (Atriplex depressa), lesser saltscale (Atriplex minuscula), big-scale balsamroot (Balsamorhiza macrolepis), Congdon's tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii), palmate- bracted bird's-beak (Chloropyron palmatum), San Joaquin spearscale (Extriplex joaquinana), prostrate vernal pool navarretia (Navarretia prostrata), long-styled sand-spurrey (Spergularia macrotheca), saline clover (Trifolium hydrophilum), and caper-fruited tropidocarpum (Tropidocarpum capparideum).

Three of the aforementioned species require specialized habitats that do not occur on the site such as mesic soils (prostrate vernal pool navarretia and saline clover) and meadows, seeps, marshes, and swamps (long-styled sand-spurrey). As such, the species are not expected to occur onsite. However, the on-site soils, which are considered to be mildly alkaline, provide potentially suitable habitat for the remaining seven species. In the absence of protocol-level rare plant surveys, the presence of special-status plants on the site cannot be ruled out. Rare plant surveys should be conducted during the appropriate season, for these seven species. 10 Johnson Marigot Consulting. Brief Biological Constraints Analysis for the Collier Canyon Parcels – Alameda County, California. January 2020.

EXHIBIT B
317
It should be noted that the site is within the boundaries of the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) within Conservation Zone (CZ) 4. However, according to maps in Appendix D of the EACCS, the site is not within the range of potential habitat for any plant species covered under the EACCS (i.e., San Joaquin spearscale, recurved larkspur, big tarplant, and Congdon’s tarplant).

Special-Status Wildlife
According to the Brief Biological Constraints Analysis, total of six special-status wildlife species have been documented within three miles of the site, inlcuding burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), and western pond turtle (Emys marmorata). Four of the aforementioned species require specialized habitats that do not occur on-site, including vernal pools (vernal pool fairy shrimp), grasslands adjacent to seasonal wetlands/ponds that constitute aquatic breeding habitat (California tiger salamander), wetlands with tall emergent vegetation (tricolored blackbird), and upland habitats with adjacent permanent or nearly permanent water (western pond turtle). However, the potential exists for burrowing owl (California Species of Special Concern) and California red-legged frog (federally threatened and California Species of Special Concern) to occur on-site.

While burrowing owls or evidence of their use of the site was not observed during the site visit, the on-site grasslands support numerous ground squirrel burrows that could provide suitable nesting sites for burrowing owl. Additionally, California red-legged frogs have been documented within Collier Canyon Creek, just 0.2-mile upstream from the project site. While the onsite grasslands are unlikely to be used by the species and the on-site portion of the creek does not provide suitable breeding habitat, the riparian corridor could support dispersing individuals. Lastly, according to the Brief Biological Constraints Analysis, while records for special-status bat species do not exist in the vicinity of the project site, the riparian corridor provides suitable habitat for roosting bats.

Given that trees exist on-site, the potential exists for nesting raptors or migratory birds, including species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), to be present within the site at certain times of year. All nesting raptors and migratory birds, regardless of their status, are protected by State and federal laws. Therefore, construction activities that adversely affect the nesting success of raptors and migratory birds (i.e., lead to the abandonment of active nests) or result in mortality of individual birds constitute a violation of State and federal laws. Thus, project construction-related activities that would occur during the breeding season could result in an adverse effect to species protected under State Fish and Game Code and the MBTA, should such species be present on or adjacent to the project site.

As discussed above, the site is within the boundaries of the EACCS, within Conservation Zone (CZ) 4. However, according to maps in Appendix D of the EACCS, the site is not within the range of potential habitat for the majority of wildlife species covered under the EACCS (i.e., longhorn fairy shrimp, vernal pool fairy shrimp, Callippe silverspot butterfly, foothill yellow-legged frog, Alameda whipsnake, Central California Coast steelhead, golden eagle, tricolored blackbird, western burrowing owl, American badger, and San Joaquin kit fox). The project site is within the range of potential upland habitat for California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog.

EXHIBIT B
318
Conclusion
The proposed project would be subject to INSP Policies related to biological resources, as well as applicable 2018 INSP EIR mitigation measures, including MM-BIO-1, which requires a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan for special-status plant species, and MM-BIO-2, MM-BIO -3, MM-BIO -7, MM-BIO -9 through -9, which requires avoidance of nesting birds, burrowing owl nesting, California tiger salamander, California red-legged frog, and roosting bats where feasible. As such, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than what were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR. b,c According to the 2018 INSP EIR, development within the INSP could affect up to one acre of riparian vegetation, both during construction and operations. The changes resulting from future development under the INSP would result in a potentially significant impact on riparian vegetation. However, the 2018 INSP EIR determined that with implementation of INSP polices, and mitigation measures MM-BIO-10 and MM-BIO-11, impacts to riparian habitat would be less than significant.

According to the 2018 INSP EIR, seasonal wetlands, freshwater emergent wetlands, and drainages occur within the INSP area. Such features are expected to be subject to USACE jurisdiction. Additionally, riparian habitat may be subject to USACE jurisdiction and falls under the purview of CDFW. New development associated with the INSP could affect such protected features, both during construction and operation; thus, a potentially significant impact on wetlands and other waters could occur. However, the 2018 INSP EIR determined that with implementation of INSP polices, and mitigation measures MM-BIO12 and MM-BIO-13, impacts to federally protected wetlands and other waters regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act would be less than significant.

According to the Brief Biological Constraints Analysis, Collier Canyon Creek transects the northern portion of the project site and defines the western boundary of the project site.

The riparian corridor associated with the creek is primarily dominated by a dense canopy cover comprised of willow (Salix lasiandra and S. lasiolepis), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii), and black walnut (Juglans hindsii).

Breaks in the canopy are scattered along the length of the corridor, with understory plants such as beardless wildrye (Elymus triticoides), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), and coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis) dominating the openings. The intermittent creek was completely dry along the north-south stretch, but had standing water in the upper reaches during the November 22, 2019 site visit. The incised creek channel ranges between 2 and 4-feet-wide at ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and eight and 20-feet-wide at top of bank (TOB). Any proposed modification of Collier Creek, including modification to the bed, banks, or riparian vegetation, would trigger permitting requirements by the CDFW.

Collier Canyon Creek is a jurisdictional water of the U.S. and State. Any modification of Collier Creek, including placement of any fill materials, or modification of the bed, banks, or riparian vegetation, will trigger permitting requirements from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), pursuant to the Clean Water Act, and the CDFW, pursuant to California Fish and Game Code (CFGC).

In addition, a single potential seasonal wetland occurs in the southwestern portion of the project site. The topographically low area exhibited 100 percent cover of saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), a facultative wetland plant that could indicate the presence of a

EXHIBIT B
319
jurisdictional seasonal wetland. Due to the ephemeral nature of seasonal wetlands, observation of wetland character is best completed during the winter and spring months.

Surveys conducted out of season are limited, and more features may be observed when a formal wetland delineation is completed. In order for wetlands to be jurisdictional, they must meet federal or state standards which typically includes a 3-parameter test (hydrology, soils, vegetation). If the wetland feature is determined to be a regulated water of the U.S. or State, any subsequent fill of the feature would trigger permitting requirements from the USACE and the RWQCB.

According to the Aquatic Resource Delineation report prepared for the proposed project, (see Appendix C)11 a total of 513 linear feet and 0.18-acre of potential wetland and nonwetland waters of the U.S. and State are present in the project site, as well as 1.02 acres of CDFW-regulated riparian zones. All delineated wetland and non-wetland waters are assumed to be subject to USACE and RWQCB jurisdiction for the purposes of the proposed project, and all delineated streams, wetlands, and riparian zones are assumed to be subject to CDFW jurisdiction.

The currently proposed project’s area of impact is within the previously analyzed area of impact of the 2018 INSP EIR. In addition, the proposed project would be subject to applicable INSP policies and mitigation measures, which would require compensation of jurisdictional wetlands and non-wetland waters. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. As such, the proposed project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.
d. According to the 2018 INSP EIR, given the surrounding network of existing developed parcels and roads, existing human activity and visitation, and existing human and vehicle noise, the INSP area does not likely serve as a habitat corridor; thus, further development projects within the INSP is not anticipated to significantly block or interfere with wildlife species movement. As a result, the 2018 INSP EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

The project site is located in an urbanized area and is bordered by existing roadways to the south and east and commercial development to the north. While the Collier Canyon Creek is located adjacent to the western border of the project site, the 2018 INSP EIR noted that Collier Canyon Creek is fragmented by multiple road crossings, and, therefore does not likely serve as a wildlife corridor due to the presence of human activity and noise.

As such, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites.

Based on the above, the currently proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. As such, the proposed project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.
e. According to the 2018 INSP EIR, implementation of future projects within the INSP area may result in the removal of trees subject to the City of Livermore’s jurisdiction. The City 11 Johnson Marigot Consulting, LLC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Aquatic Resource Delineation Report Collier Canyon Parcels Project Alameda County, California. March 2022.

EXHIBIT B
320
of Livermore Department of Public Works and/or the Community Development Department ultimately determines the replacement ratio during the permitting process.

The removal of regulated trees without a permit or appropriate compensation would result in a significant impact; however, the 2018 INSP EIR concluded that implementation of INSP Policy P-ENV-28, which requires a tree removal permit and a tree avoidance, minimization, and replacement plan consistent with the City of Livermore’s Street Tree and Tree Preservation Ordinance, impacts related to conflicts with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would be less than significant.

Because the proposed project would require the removal of any trees, the Site Plan Design Review application would cover any tree removals and would be subject to Sections

12.20.080 and 12.20.190 of the City’s Municipal Code. Said tree removal may require mitigation for removal of native species and/or mature trees.

Based on the above information, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. As a result, the proposed project would be consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.
f. The project site is not located in an area with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other adopted local or State HCP.

Therefore, the INSP concluded that no impact would occur related to conflicting with such plans. It should be noted that the project site is within the boundaries of the EACCS, a guidance document for regional conservation and environmental permitting for private and public development projects. However, while conservation strategies are provided by the EACCS, the document is not considered an adopted HCP/NCCP.

Based on the above information, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. As a result, the proposed project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
Because the proposed project would not result in potential impacts related to tricolored blackbird, western pond turtle, San Joaquin kit fox, American badger, or Callippe silverspot butterfly, MMBIO-4, MM-BIO-5, MM-BIO-6, or MM-BIO-8 would not be applicable to the proposed project. The following mitigation measure(s) from the 2018 INSP EIR would apply to the proposed project:

MM-BIO-1: Prepare and implement a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan for special-status plant species.

If a protocol-level botanical survey reveals the presence of special-status plant species in the Planning Area, all directly affected areas of special-status plants will be documented by a qualified botanist or ecologist retained by project proponents prior to issuance of grading permits. Documentation will include density and percent cover; key habitat characteristics, including soil type, associated species, hydrology, and topography; and photographs of preconstruction conditions. The project proponent will notify USFWS and/or CDFW and a qualified botanist or restoration ecologist will prepare a salvage, relocation, or propagation and monitoring plan in coordination with USFWS and/or CDFW prior to construction to address affected special-status plant species. The plan will include provisions that address the

EXHIBIT B
321
techniques, location, and procedures required for the successful establishment of the plant populations. The plan will include provisions for performance that address survivability requirements, maintenance, monitoring, implementation, and the annual reporting requirements.

Monitoring and success criteria applicable to special-status plant salvage, relocation, or propagation will require the following.
• At least two surveys by a qualified botanist or ecologist per monitoring year. • At least 80 percent of the planted area must support vegetation composition and density consistent with reference population conditions. • At least 80 percent of the planted area must support target species amounts similar to reference feature conditions.
• A minimum of five consecutive years of monitoring to ensure success criteria are met.

MM-BIO-2: Avoid nesting birds where feasible.

Proponents (or their contractors) of specific projects under the proposed Plan shall conduct construction activities outside the bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31) to the extent feasible. If construction initiation is unavoidable during this time, the project proponent or its contractor will retain a qualified wildlife biologist with demonstrated nest-searching experience to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds (including raptors, but excluding burrowing owl) within 300 feet and including the near-term or longer-term improvements environmental footprints.

Adjacent lands outside the development footprints will be scanned with binoculars from the limit of ground-disturbance and publicly accessible areas. Preconstruction surveys will occur no more than three days prior to the onset of ground-disturbing activities (including clearing, grubbing, and staging) at each development area. If active nests are found in the development footprints, the biologist will establish a nodisturbance buffer around the nest and mark the buffer perimeter with high-visibility fencing, flagging, or pin flags. The size of the buffer will be based on the species' sensitivity to disturbance and planned work activities in the vicinity; typical buffer sizes are 250 feet for raptors and 50 feet for other birds. The buffer will remain in place until the nest is no longer active, as determined by the biologist. Buffers for any nests found outside but within 300 feet of the development sites will be established based on the biologist’s best professional judgment whether the work would result in nest abandonment. If a lapse in construction activities of 15 days or longer at a previously surveyed environmental footprint occurs, another preconstruction survey will be conducted.

If structure demolition activities cannot occur outside of the nesting season, the project proponent or its contractor will remove inactive nests from the structure to be demolished and install nest exclusion measures (e.g., fine mesh netting, panels, or metal projectors) outside of the nesting season. All exclusionary devices will be monitored and maintained throughout the breeding season to ensure that they are successful in preventing the birds from accessing the cavities or nest sites. No more than three days prior to structure demolition activities, a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey of all potential nesting habitat on the structures to be demolished/modified and the surrounding areas for the presence of active nests. If active nests are found on the structures or in the affected area, then

EXHIBIT B
322
demolition/modification activities will not proceed until the biologist verifies that all nests on the structures are inactive.

After all surveys and/or nest deterrence activities are completed at each development footprint, the biologist will complete a memorandum detailing the survey effort and results and submit the memorandum to the project proponent within seven days of survey completion.

MM-BIO-3: Avoid burrowing owl nesting where feasible.

Prior to any construction activity planned during the fall and winter non-nesting season (September 1 through January 31) or at any time during the construction process, proponents of projects proposed within the Planning Area will retain a qualified wildlife biologist to conduct a preconstruction survey for burrowing owls.

Surveys will be conducted at each area of suitable habitat that will be disturbed no more than seven days prior to ground-disturbing activities and will cover all suitable burrowing owl habitat subject to disturbance pursuant to CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game, 2012). If any burrowing owls are found within the disturbance area, the project proponent will notify CDFW and will proceed under CDFW direction.

If construction is planned to occur during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31), the project proponent will retain a qualified wildlife biologist to conduct a breeding season burrowing owl survey in the year prior to construction. The survey will be conducted to determine if there is a breeding pair within approximately 500 feet of each development footprint, unless the biologist determines that a smaller survey buffer around the construction footprint is warranted based on preexisting background disturbance and conditions. Survey visits will be timed in accordance with CDFW guidelines (California Department of Fish and Game, 2012). This will provide the project team advance notice of nesting owls in the development area and allow ample time to discuss appropriate avoidance measures with CDFW. In addition, preconstruction surveys will be conducted no more than seven days prior to ground disturbance in all areas of the development footprint supporting burrowing owl habitat.

If the biologist identifies the presence of a burrowing owl nest in an area scheduled to be disturbed by construction, a 660-foot no-activity buffer will be established and maintained around the nest while it is active. Surveys and buffer establishment will be performed by qualified wildlife biologists, and buffers will be coordinated with CDFW by contacting the appropriate CDFW personnel, and will be subject to CDFW review and oversight.

MM-BIO-7: Avoid California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog where feasible.

Proponents of specific projects within the Planning Area shall retain a USFWS and/or CDFW-approved biologist (as appropriate) to identify and flag (pin flags or 4-foot lath) all suitable aquatic habitat for California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog outside of but adjacent to development footprints and ground-disturbance areas prior to staging, vegetation clearing, grading, or other construction activities. The project proponent or its contractor will protect habitat areas by installing orange exclusion and erosion control fencing at the maximum practicable distance from the work site or, if feasible, at least 500 feet from the aquatic habitat edge, wet or dry, to make it easily visible by construction crews.

EXHIBIT B
323
A qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey each morning before construction activities begin and continue to monitor ground-disturbing construction activities where suitable habitat occurs during all phases of construction to remove any California tiger salamander and California red-legged frogs found in the development footprint. Individual salamanders and frogs will be moved immediately to a relocation site that is a minimum of 330 feet from the construction boundary. The relocation site will be determined in coordination with USFWS and/or CDFW prior to the commencement of construction activities.

Construction activities near drainages and wetland complexes identified as potential movement corridors shall take place between July 1 and October 1, when the California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog are least likely to be present in the development area.

To discourage California tiger salamander and California red-legged frogs from entering the improvements areas via ditches, the ditches will be equipped with lightweight, one-way flow gates. These will be designed so that water can easily pass from the construction site to the ditches, but small vertebrates such as the salamander or frog cannot move upstream from ditches to the development area.

MM-BIO-9: Avoid roosting bats where feasible.

If tree removal and trimming cannot be conducted between September 15 and October 30, proponents of projects implemented under the proposed Plan will retain a qualified biologist to examine trees to be removed or trimmed for suitable bat roosting habitat no more than 2 weeks before removal and trimming. High-quality habitat features (large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, larger snags, palm trees with intact thatch, etc.) will be identified and the area around these features searched for bats and bat signs (e.g., guano, culled insect parts, urine staining, etc.). Mixed willow riparian scrub and stands of mature broadleaf trees should be considered potential habitat for solitary foliage-roosting bat species.

Passive monitoring using full spectrum bat detectors may be needed if identification of bat species is required. Survey methods will be discussed with CDFW prior to the start of surveys.

Measures to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive bats species will be determined in coordination with CDFW and may include the following. • Tree removal will be avoided between April 1 and September 15 (the maternity period) to avoid effects on pregnant females and active maternity roosts (whether colonial or solitary).
• All tree removal will be conducted between September 15 and October 30, which corresponds to a time period when bats have not yet entered torpor or would be caring for nonvolant (non-flying) young.
• Each tree will be removed in pieces rather than felling the entire tree. • If a maternity roost is located, whether solitary or colonial, that roost will remain undisturbed until September 15 or a qualified biologist has determined the roost is no longer active.
• If avoidance of nonmaternity roost trees is not possible, and tree removal or trimming must occur between October 30 and September 15, qualified biologists will monitor tree trimming and removal. If possible, tree trimming and

EXHIBIT B
324
removal should occur in the late afternoon or evening when it is closer to the time that bats would normally arouse. Prior to removal and trimming, each tree will be shaken gently and several minutes should pass before felling trees or limbs to allow bats time to arouse and leave the tree. The biologists will search downed vegetation for dead and injured bats. The presence of dead or injured bats that are species of special concern will be reported to CDFW. The biologist will prepare biological monitoring report, which will be provided to the project proponent and CDFW.

MM-BIO-10: Avoid and protect riparian habitat during construction.

Proponents of specific projects under the proposed Plan will ensure that a qualified resource specialist (i.e., biologist, botanist, or ecologist) will clearly identify riparian habitat to be preserved abutting the development area and outside of the direct construction area with high-visibility construction fencing or markers (e.g., lathe or pin flags) before site preparation. Construction will not encroach upon sensitive natural communities identified by the resource specialist. The resource specialist will use the project’s verified wetland delineation, soils data, and land cover data to confirm the location of riparian habitat boundaries based on existing conditions at the time of the avoidance marking. Exclusion fencing or markers will be installed before construction activities are initiated, and the fencing will be maintained throughout the construction period. No construction activity, traffic, equipment, or materials will be permitted in fenced sensitive natural community areas. Exclusion fencing and markers will be removed following completion of construction activities.

All conditions imposed by State and federal permits for individual improvements will be clearly identified in the construction plans and specifications and monitored during and after construction to ensure compliance.

MM-BIO-11: Compensate for loss of riparian habitat.

For direct effects on woody riparian trees that cannot be avoided, proponents of specific projects under the proposed Plan will compensate for the loss of riparian habitat to ensure no net loss of habitat functions and values. Compensation ratios will be based on site-specific information and determined through coordination with the appropriate State and federal agencies during the permitting process. At a minimum, the compensation ratio will be 2:1 (e.g., two acres restored/created/enhanced or credits purchased for every 1 acre removed) for permanent impacts and 1:1 for temporary impacts (where riparian habitat will regenerate to pre-activity character within one year). Compensation may be a combination of offsite restoration or mitigation credits. The project proponent or its contractor will develop a restoration and monitoring plan that describes how riparian habitat will be enhanced or recreated and monitored over at least 5 years, or as determined by the appropriate State and federal agencies.

If the project proponent identifies suitable onsite areas (adjacent to the permanent construction footprint) that are outside the development footprint and chooses to compensate onsite or in the project’s vicinity, a revegetation plan will be prepared.

The revegetation plan will be developed prior to the removal of existing riparian vegetation and will be conducted onsite or in the near-term or longer-term

EXHIBIT B
325
improvements vicinity to the extent feasible; however, mitigation site selection will avoid areas where future development or maintenance are likely. The revegetation plan will be prepared by a qualified botanist or restoration specialist with experience in riparian restoration and reviewed by the appropriate agencies. The revegetation plan will specify the planting stock appropriate for each riparian land cover type and each mitigation site, ensuring the use of genetic stock from the corresponding development area by project. The plan will employ the most successful techniques available at the time of planting. Success criteria will be established as part of the plan and will include a minimum of 70 percent revegetation success after three years, 80 percent revegetation success at the end of five years, and 75 percent vegetative coverage after five years.

The project proponent or its contractor will retain a qualified botanist, restoration ecologist, or biologist with experience in riparian restoration to monitor the plantings as necessary for five years. The project proponent or its contractor will be responsible for maintaining the plantings, including managing invasive plants (as defined by the California Invasive Plant Council) and other weeds, and implementing irrigation and plant protection if necessary. The project proponent or its contractor will submit annual monitoring reports to the regulatory agencies issuing permits related to habitat effects, including CDFW, USACE, and USFWS.

Replanting will be necessary if success criteria are not met, and replacement plants subsequently will be monitored and maintained to meet the success criteria.

The riparian habitat mitigation will be considered successful when the sapling trees established meet the success criteria, the habitat no longer requires substantial active management, and vegetation is arranged in groups that, when mature, replicate the area, natural structure, stratification, and species composition of similar riparian habitats in the region.

MM-BIO-12: Avoid and protect wetlands during construction.

Proponents of specific projects under the proposed Plan will ensure that a qualified resource specialist (i.e., wetland biologist, ecologist, or soil scientist) will clearly identify wetland areas to be preserved abutting the development area and wetland areas outside of the direct construction area with high-visibility construction fencing or markers (e.g., lathe or pin flags) before site preparation. Construction will not encroach upon jurisdictional wetlands identified by the resource specialist. The resource specialist will use the development footprint and verified wetland delineation to confirm the location of wetland boundaries based on existing conditions at the time of the avoidance marking. Exclusion fencing or markers will be installed before construction activities are initiated, and the fencing will be maintained throughout the construction period. No construction activity, traffic, equipment, or materials will be permitted in fenced wetland areas. Exclusion fencing and markers will be removed following the completion of construction activities.

All conditions imposed by the projects’ State and federal permits will be implemented as part of the construction, with ultimate enforcement oversight by applicable State and federal agencies. The conditions will be clearly identified in the construction plans and specifications and monitored during and after construction to ensure compliance.

EXHIBIT B
326
MM-BIO-13: Compensate for impacts on jurisdictional wetlands and non-wetland waters of the United States (aquatic resources) prior to near-term and longer-term improvements impacts during construction.

If projects impact jurisdictional wetlands and non-wetland waters, proponents of these specific projects under the proposed Plan will develop an aquatic resource (wetlands and non-wetland waters of the United States) mitigation plan, subject to approval by the USACE, which will ensure no net loss of wetlands from development impacts. The plan will detail the amount and type of wetlands (based on the projects’ verified wetland delineation) that will be compensated for (through preservation, creation, or restoration) for impacts on existing wetlands and nonwetland waters of the United States (aquatic resources), and outline the monitoring and success criteria for the compensation wetlands and non-wetland waters of the United States. Additional enhancement options include fish barrier removal, riparian restoration, floodplain restoration, and streambank layback to improve overall ecologic function and connectivity of wetland and non-wetland waters.

Enhancement sites will be located as near the impact location as possible but, in the event that local enhancement opportunities are not available, such activities will occur within the same stream system or watershed to provide improved ecologic function and connectivity of wetlands and non-wetland waters affected by development activities.

Monitoring and success criteria applicable to created or restored wetlands will require the following.
• At least two surveys by a qualified wetland biologist, botanist, or ecologist per monitoring year.
• At least 80 percent of the created or restored features support vegetation consistent with reference feature conditions.
• At least 80 percent of the created or restored features support hydrologic regimes similar to reference feature conditions.
• A minimum of five consecutive years of monitoring to ensure success criteria are met.
• Remedial actions to restore intended ecological function of created or restored features that fail to meet the success criteria for three consecutive years.

Once the plan is approved, the project proponent will implement the aquatic resource compensation measures prior to the initiation of development construction. The project proponent will be responsible for funding compensatory mitigation, monitoring of the created or restored features per the mitigation plan, and any remedial actions necessary. All conditions that are attached to the State and federal permits will be implemented as part of the development project, with ultimate enforcement oversight by applicable State and federal agencies. The conditions will be clearly identified in the construction plans and specifications and monitored during and after construction to ensure compliance.

EXHIBIT B
327
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.13-
14 to 3.13-
16 No No No
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a unique
archaeological resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.13-16 No No No
c. Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries.
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.13-
18 to 3.13-
19 No No No
Discussion
a. The 2018 INSP EIR assessed the potential for buildout of the INSP to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and determined that the Gandolfo Ranch historic district was identified for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The 2018 INSP EIR determined that development of the agricultural property as part of the INSP would result in the demolition, destruction, relocation, and/or alteration of the historical resource such that the significance of the resource would be materially impaired. Given that the Gandolfo Ranch is a known historical resource, the site of which would be substantially altered under the INSP, even with implementation of INSP Policies P-ENV-34 through PENV-37, would a substantial change to the significance of a historical resource would likely occur, and known feasible policies and mitigation measures are not available to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level, the INSP determine that the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. The project site is not located within the Gandolfo Ranch.

A field survey of the project site was conducted on August 6, 2024 as part of the Cultural Resources Study prepared for the proposed project by Tom Origer & Associates.12 Buildings or structures were not determined to be present within the project site. A small memorial was observed in the northern portion of the project site; however, because the memorial is modern and does not represent a human burial, the memorial is not determined to be a historic resource. Thus, the project site does not contain any structures which would be considered historical, nor would the project result in removal of any possible historic resources. In addition, the proposed project would be implemented within the previously analyzed footprint of the 2018 INSP EIR, and is not located within an area for which the 2018 INSP EIR identified any historic resources. As such, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than what were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. As a result, the proposed project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR. b,c. The 2018 INSP EIR assessed the potential for buildout of the INSP to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to 12 Tom Origer & Associates. Cultural Resources Study for the Cornerstone Townhomes Project Livermore, Alameda County, California. August 13, 2024.

EXHIBIT B
328
Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, or disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries. The 2018 INSP EIR concluded that future development would involve grading, excavation, or other ground-disturbing activities, which could potentially disturb or destroy significant buried archaeological resources and/or human remains. Nonetheless, the 2018 INSP EIR determined that with implementation of INSP Policies P-ENV-34 and P-ENV-37, all potential impacts would be less than significant. The proposed project would be subject to the requirements of the aforementioned policies related to archeological resources and inadvertent discovery of human remains.

In compliance with INSP Policy P-ENV-34 and to ensure that any additional resources have not been discovered since the adoption of the 2018 INSP EIR, as part of the Cultural Resources Study prepared for the proposed project, a records search of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) was performed by the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) for cultural resource site records and survey reports within the project area. The NWIC concluded that the project site does not contain any recorded archaeological resources nor any historic buildings or structures on any lists of historic resources. A review of 19th and 20th century maps showed that buildings did not exist within the study area prior to 1953. However, aerial photos show buildings present within the study area by 1949. Topographic maps also show two buildings at the north end and four buildings in the southern half of the study area. By 1972, the building complex near the southwest corner of the study area was removed, an additional building complex was present in the north end, and a road was being developed through the study area. Most of the buildings were removed between 1993 and 2002, and the last complex was removed by 2020. In addition, a search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File search did not yield any information regarding the presence of Tribal Cultural Resources within the project site or the immediate area.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2018 INSP EIR. As a result, the proposed project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2018 INSP EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
None Required.

EXHIBIT B
329
VI. ENERGY.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.4-22
to 3.4-29
2020 SEIR
pgs. 3.3-24
to 3.3-31
No No Yes
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
N/A No No Yes
Discussion
a,b. It should be noted that since the preparation of the 2020 INSP SEIR, regulations pertaining to energy use have become much more stringent. Therefore, the construction and operational energy demand associated with the proposed project is anticipated to be less than what was assumed in the 2020 INSP SEIR analysis.

Through existing infrastructure, electrical and natural gas services are provided to the site by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E). During construction and operations, the currently proposed project would be subject to regulations required by the CARB, the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, and the 2022 CALGreen standards.

A description of the California Green Building Standards Code and the Building Energy Efficiency Standards follows, as well as discussions regarding the proposed project’s potential effects related to energy demand during construction and operations.

California Green Building Standards Code
The 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, otherwise known as the CALGreen Code (CCR Title 24, Part 11), is a portion of the CBSC, which became effective with the rest of the CBSC on January 1, 2023.13 The purpose of the CALGreen Code is to improve public health, safety, and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. The CALGreen standards regulate the method of use, properties, performance, types of materials used in construction, alteration repair, improvement and rehabilitation of a structure or improvement to property. The provisions of the code apply to the planning, design, operation, construction, use, and occupancy of every newly constructed building or structure throughout California. Requirements of the CALGreen Code include, but are not limited to, the following measures:
• Compliance with relevant regulations related to future installation of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure in residential and non-residential structures; • Indoor water use consumption is reduced through the establishment of maximum fixture water use rates;
• Outdoor landscaping must comply with the California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, or a local ordinance, whichever is more stringent, to reduce outdoor water use; • Diversion of 65 percent of construction and demolition waste from landfills; 13 California Building Standards Commission. 2022 California Green Building Standards Code. 2023.

EXHIBIT B
330
• Incentives for installation of electric heat pumps, which use less energy than traditional heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and water heaters;
• Required solar PV system and battery storage standards for certain buildings; and • Mandatory use of low-pollutant emitting interior finish materials such as paints, carpet, vinyl flooring, and particle board.

Building Energy Efficiency Standards
The 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards is a portion of the CBSC, which expands upon energy-efficiency measures from the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, went into effect starting January 1, 2023. The 2022 standards provide for additional efficiency improvements beyond the 2019 standards. The proposed project would be subject to all relevant provisions of the most recent update of the CBSC, including the Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Adherence to the most recent CALGreen Code and Building Energy Efficiency Standards would ensure that the proposed structure would consume energy efficiently.

Construction Energy Use
The 2020 INSP SEIR concluded that the land uses proposed under the INSP would not require extraordinary amounts of energy during construction, and construction would represent a relatively short demand on local and regional fuel supplies that could be accommodated. Thus, the 2020 INSP SEIR concluded that construction activities would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary usage of direct or indirect energy.

Construction of the proposed project would involve on-site energy demand and consumption related to use of oil in the form of gasoline and diesel fuel for construction worker vehicle trips, hauling and materials delivery truck trips, and operation of off-road construction equipment. In addition, diesel-fueled portable generators may be necessary to provide additional electricity demands for temporary on-site lighting, welding, and for supplying energy to areas of the site where energy supply cannot be met via a hookup to the existing electricity grid. Project construction would not involve the use of natural gas appliances or equipment.

All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the CARB InUse Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation. The In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation is intended to reduce emissions from in-use, off-road, heavy-duty diesel vehicles in California by imposing limits on idling, requiring all vehicles to be reported to CARB, restricting the addition of older vehicles into fleets, and requiring fleets to reduce emissions by retiring, replacing, or repowering older engines, or installing exhaust retrofits. In addition, as a means of reducing emissions, construction vehicles are required to become cleaner through the use of renewable energy resources. The In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation would therefore help to improve fuel efficiency for equipment used in construction of the proposed project. Technological innovations and more stringent standards are being researched, such as multi-function equipment, hybrid equipment, or other design changes, which could help to further reduce demand on oil and limit emissions associated with construction.

Based on the above, the temporary increase in energy use occurring during construction of the proposed project would not result in a significant increase in peak or base demands or require additional capacity from local or regional energy supplies. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable regulations related to

EXHIBIT B
331
energy conservation and fuel efficiency, which would help to reduce the temporary increase in demand. Therefore, construction energy usage related to the proposed project would be similar to what was anticipated in the 2020 INSP SEIR.

Operational Energy Use
The 2020 INSP SEIR determined that operation of the INSP would decrease demand for energy- and fuel-related energy resources on a per capita basis, and thus, operation of future land uses associated with development of the INSP would not result in a wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary usage of direct or indirect energy.

Energy use associated with operation of the proposed project would be typical of residential and public park development, requiring electricity for interior and exterior building lighting, HVAC, electronic equipment, machinery, refrigeration, appliances, security systems, and more. Maintenance activities during operations, such as landscape maintenance, would involve the use of electric or gas-powered equipment. In addition to on-site energy use, the proposed project would result in transportation energy use associated with vehicle trips generated by the proposed residential units.

The proposed project would be subject to all relevant provisions of the most recent update of the CBSC, including the Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Adherence to the most recent CALGreen Code and the Building Energy Efficiency Standards would ensure that the proposed structures would consume energy efficiently. Required compliance with the CBSC would ensure that the building energy use associated with the proposed project would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. In addition, electricity supplied to the project by PG&E would comply with the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 60 percent of total procurement by 2030. Thus, a portion of the energy consumed during project operations would originate from renewable sources.

As discussed in Section VIII, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this Initial Study/15182 Checklist, the proposed project would be built all-electric, which is consistent with the requirements of the 2022 Green Building Standards Code, as well as Strategy B-1 of the City of Livermore Climate Action Plan (CAP). Furthermore, consistent with the 2022 CALGreen Code requirements, 100 percent of the townhome electricity would be generated by rooftop solar panels. The inclusion of solar panels would drastically reduce the demand for grid supplied electricity of the proposed project.

With regard to transportation energy use, the proposed project would comply with all applicable regulations associated with vehicle efficiency and fuel economy. In addition, as discussed in Section XVII, Transportation, of this Initial Study/15182 Checklist, the project site is located within close proximity to existing bicycle infrastructure and transit infrastructure, and would also provide EV charging stations, pursuant to the City’s Reach Code. Bicycle parking would be included on-site, which would encourage patrons to use alternative transportation.

Based on the above, operational energy usage from buildout of the proposed project would be similar to what was anticipated in the 2020 INSP SEIR.

EXHIBIT B
332
Conclusion
Based on the above information, the currently proposed project would involve energy use associated with construction activities and operations; however, the proposed project would comply with all applicable State energy standards, which would ensure that construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources or conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Therefore, energy usage from buildout of the proposed project would be less than what was anticipated in the 2020 INSP SEIR, and impacts related to energy use would be less than significant.

Prior Mitigation Measures
None Required.

EXHIBIT B
333
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.12-
15 to 3.12-
17 i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

No No No
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? No No No
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction? No No No
iv. Landslides? No No No
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.12-
17 to 3.12-
18 No No No
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.12-18 No No No
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct
or indirect risks to life or property?
2018 EIR
pgs. 3.12-
18 to 3.12-
19 No No No
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.12-19 No No No
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
2018 EIR
pg. 3.13-17
to 3.13-18
No No No
Discussion
ai.-aii. The 2018 INSP EIR collectively analyzed the potential of buildout of the INSP to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault or strong seismic ground shaking under Impact 3.12-1. As discussed therein, faults zoned under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act are not present within the INSP Planning Area. The AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zones nearest to the Planning Area are associated with the Calaveras Fault, approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest, and the Greenville Fault, approximately 6.3 miles to the northeast. Because known active faults do not exist within

EXHIBIT B
334
the INSP Planning Area, the 2018 INSP EIR concluded that there would be no impact related to the rupture of a known earthquake fault.

With regard to seismic ground shaking, the 2018 EIR determined that, due to the proximity of the Calaveras and Greenville Faults, locations within the Planning Area could experience considerable ground shaking in the event of an earthquake. However, compliance with CBSC requirements, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) roadway development standards, and standard industry practices would reduce potential impacts from ground shaking to the greatest extent feasible and the 2018 EIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant.

Potential seismic hazards resulting from a nearby moderate to major earthquake can generally be classified as primary and secondary. The primary effect is ground rupture, also called surface faulting. The common secondary seismic hazards include ground shaking and ground lurching. Because the project site does not contain any known active faults and is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, ground rupture is unlikely at the project site.

Based on past events, an earthquake of moderate to high magnitude generated by the San Francisco Bay Region could cause considerable ground shaking at the project site.

However, the CBSC provides minimum standards to ensure that the proposed structures would be designed using sound engineering practices and appropriate engineering standards for the seismic area in which the project site is located. Projects designed in accordance with the CBSC should be able to: 1) resist minor earthquakes without damage, 2) resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage but with some nonstructural damage, and 3) resist major earthquakes without collapse but with some structural as well as nonstructural damage. Although conformance with the CBSC does not guarantee that substantial structural damage would not occur in the event of a maximum magnitude earthquake, conformance with the CBSC can reasonably be assumed to ensure that the proposed structure would not collapse, resulting in a loss of life in a major earthquake.