Agenda packet — Livermore City Council, October 27, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 4 204 0 1 162
Future Vol, veh/h 1 4 204 0 1 162
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 4 222 0 1 176
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 400 222 0 0 222 0
Stage 1 222 -----
Stage 2 178 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 606 818 - - 1347 -
Stage 1 815 -----
Stage 2 853 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 605 818 - - 1347 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 605 -----
Stage 1 815 -----
Stage 2 852 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.74 0 0.05

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 764 11 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.007 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 9.7 7.7 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
ATTACHMENT 6
235
HCM 7th TWSC
1: Project Dwy. & Dolores St. 06/04/2025
Scenario 1 2:12 pm 06/04/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 268 1 3 210
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 268 1 3 210
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 2 291 1 3 228
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 527 292 0 0 292 0
Stage 1 292 -----
Stage 2 235 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 1 5 . 4 2-----
C r i t i c a l H d w y S t g 2 5 . 4 2-----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 512 747 - - 1269 -
Stage 1 758 -----
Stage 2 804 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 510 747 - - 1269 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 510 -----
Stage 1 758 -----
Stage 2 802 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v10.59 0 0.11

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 647 25 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 0.003 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 10.6 7.8 0
HCM Lane LOS - - B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
ATTACHMENT 6
236
From: Terry Cuellar
To: City Clerk
Subject: Public Hearing Notice for 3541 East Avenue
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 12:39:27 PM
Exercise Caution: This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

I received your notice in the mail but unfortunately I cannot attend the hearing.

I live at Livermore Ca 94550. I am right next to the proposed development! This would be a disaster to allow him to build multi housing on that corner. It's already one of the busiest intersections. Delores is one of 2 roads off East Avenue that allow people to drive to Tesla/N Livermore Avenue & vice versa. Building a multi housing on the corner would add to the congestion already there and possible accidents. Delores is not wide enough to handle more traffic and it already is a sitting parking lot along Delores. I believe this man attempted to get permission from our HOA board (Vineyard Townhomes) to gain access for his development to go back and forth thru our property that our residents pay for the roads and upkeep. Our answer was NO and will continue to be NO as long as I am on the board!
I think this would be a big mistake!!! I vote NO! If this goes thru, The mayor, the city council etc., have lost any future votes from me!!!!!!!!!! Terry Cuellar
ATTACHMENT 7
237
ATTACHMENT 7
238
ATTACHMENT 7
239

Livermore High & East Avenue and their homes. My understanding is that 13 rental homes will be built on the property with parking for 2 cars for each home and 3 parking spaces for guest parking only!! This will further push more cars to park on Delores. Also my understanding is they will be tearing down the old NOB HILL shopping center on N.

Livermore/Pacific for a Senior development that will add even more traffic at the other end of Delores/Pacific/N. Livermore Ave.

Perhaps if this actually happens, we can request speed bumps on Delores every 30 feet like Buena Vista already has had for some time to control the traffic.

I am only joking but
it is a suggestion!!!

Apparently there is a meeting concerning this development of 13 homes on 10/27/25.

Now for the reason I am writing as I was the only person as far as I know who got the pink card to attend the meeting.

I have since shared it with my neighbors who are upset
because they never got a card to advise them of the city's plans!

I believe the meeting is scheduled for 10/27/25. Please email the City Clerk to advise of your thoughts since this will not only affect locals around this mess but anyone who travels down East Ave or Delores.

Email: [email protected]

Thank you for letting me sound off!
Terry Cuellar

ATTACHMENT 7
240
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ABBOUD TOWNHOMES PROJECT IS EXEMPT

FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIORNMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 (IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS)

On June 17, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project , staff recommendations, heard public testimony, made the necessary findings, and adopted Planning Com mission Resolution No. 22-25, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending the City Council find the Project is exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Projects) and introduce an ordinance approving Planned Development (PD) 25-001.

On October 27, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, and all public comments and testimony, and findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the Ci ty of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 22 -25, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this resolution . Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby determines that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -fill Project) and none of the exceptions to the exemption listed in Section 15300.2 apply.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Clerk, if the project is approved.

241
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
On motion of Council Member _____________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Christine Crowl
Deborah L. Elam Christine Crowl
City Clerk Special Counsel

Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-25

242

EXHIBIT A
243

EXHIBIT A
244

EXHIBIT A
245

EXHIBIT A
246
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBDIVISION (SUB) 20-004 AND SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW (SPDR) 21-001

On June 14, 2020, the City received an application for Planned Development (PD) 25-001, Subdivision (SUB) 20-004, and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21 -001 to redevelop the approximately 0.62 -acre site with a two -story, attached, 13 -unit multi- family, townhome -style development (“Project”). The Project will consist of all rental units that would be grouped on one lot. The units will include three and four bedroom plans that range in size from 1,400 to 1,900 square feet, plus one Accessory Dwelling Unit. Each primary unit will have an attached two -car garage. The Project will reconstruct the curb, gutter, and si dewalk along the project’s frontages (East Avenue and Dolores Street), underground all utilities, and construct a new shared driveway to access the site from Dolores Street.

On June 17, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, staff recommendations, heard public testimony, and made the necessary findings, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-25, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending the City Council approve the project.

On October 27, 20 25, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, and all public comments and testimony, and findings.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City o f Livermore has considered the Record Evidence and adopted a resolution finding that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-fill Projects).

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2 4-25, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their ow n findings as part of this resolution. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby approves Subdivision (SUB) 20 -004 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21 -001 subject to the Condit ions of Approval, attached 247
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
hereto as Exhibit B. This approval is contingent upon the adoption of the Ordinance approving Planned Development (PD) 25 -001. Council’s approval becomes effective upon the adoption of Ordinance _____ approving Planned Development (PD) 25-001.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Clerk, if the project is approved.

The documents that constitute the record of proce edings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore California.

On motion of Council Member _____________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Christine Crowl
Deborah L. Elam Christine Crowl
City Clerk Special Counsel

Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-25
Exhibit B – Conditions of Approval

248

EXHIBIT A
249

EXHIBIT A
250

EXHIBIT A
251

EXHIBIT A
252

EXHIBIT A
253

EXHIBIT A
254
Conditions of Approval
Subdivision (SUB) 20-004
Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001
Request to approve a Subdivision (SUB20-004) and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR21-001) to allow a two-story, attached, 13-unit multi-family, townhome-style development.

The project site is located at 3541 East Ave
Recommended for Approval by Planning Commission on June 17, 2025 Approved by City Council on October 27, 2025
A. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION

1. The project shall be in conformance with all City Ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies. The conditions listed below are particularly pertinent to this permit and shall not be construed to per mit violation of other laws and policies not so listed.

2. Approval is limited to the conformance of the land use and Livermore Development Code requirements. Use of the property shall be limited to those permitted by the Livermore Development Code as it exists now or may be amended in the future.

3. This Subdivision and Site Plan Design Review approval is not an authorization to com mence construction. Tentative Parcel Map (Subdivision) and Site Plan Design Review shall expire on October 27, 2027 unless a request for extension has been filed.

4. Building construction, alterations, repairs, sign erection, or final sign off of inspections shall not be per mitted without prior approval of the Building Division through issuance of any required permits.

B. PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall demonstrate conformance to the following conditions to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department:

EXHIBIT B
255

1. The applicant shall respond in writing to all conditions contained herein and in attachments to this document. Responses shall c learly describe how each condition has been met. When the response references construction drawings, the page number and detail reference, if applicable, shall be noted.

2. All exterior windows shall be inset a minim um of 4 inches from the exterior wall or frame surface.

3. New lighting shall be direc ted downward and/or cut off shields shall be used to prevent light spill off-site.

4. The applicant shall demonstrate on the landscape plans compliance with the City’s Water Efficiency Ordinance, subject to Planning Division approval, prior to the issuance of any building permit.

5. The development impact fees and project processing fees due in connection with this permit shall be based upon the fees in effect at the tim e the fee is paid.

6. Prior to Final Map approval, the developer shall contribute $50,000 for future improvements on East Avenue in accordance with the East A venue Corridor Project as approved by the City Engineer.

7. Per Livermore Municipal Code section 12.51, if public art will be installed a site plan shall be submitted showing the location of the artwork, complete with landscaping, lighting and other appropriate accessories to complem ent and protect the artwork, along with the artist’s concept and representation, such as a drawing, photograph, or maquette of the artwork. Indicate what medium or materials will be used and include maintenance plans for the artwork. As outlined in the Muni Code, Building permits shall not be iss ued until the Commission has approved the request to install public art, and the certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until the approved work of art has been installed and an agreement has been recorded against the property to maintain the art for a minimum of thirty years. If an in-lieu contribution will be provided in place of artwork, the public art in-lieu contribution shall be paid at the time of issuance of each building permit.

C. G

ENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. Development shall conform to the final approved plans that are reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. Building Permit Plans will need to reflect any changes made by the review authority or are required by the City at the time of Building Permit submittal.

2. The Community Development Director may approve minor amendments to the permit, provided that the permit is still in substantial conformance with the original approval.

EXHIBIT B
256

3. Approval of the Subdivis ion and Site Plan Design Review entitlements do not authorize construction or operations. Building construction, alterations, repairs, sign erection, or occupanc y shall not be permitted without prior approval of the Building Division through issuance of any required permits.

4. To the extent permitted by law, the project applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City , its City Council, its officers, boards , com missions, employees and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third par ty against the indemnified parties and the applic ant to attack, set aside, or void the approval of the project or any permit authoriz ed hereby for the project, including ( without limitation) reimbursing the City its attorney’s fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice.

ENGINEERING DIVISION

1. Se
e attached Engineering Considerations ("Exhibit A") dated May 21, 2025.

E. BUI

LDING DIVISION

1. P
roject shall conform to CA Codes adopted at time of Building permit submittal.

2. P
rovide complete stamped and signed plans at building permit submittal.

F. HO
USING

1. Th
e project is subject to a 15% inclusionary requirement based on 13 units which will require 1.95 affordable units (the ADU for unit 13 is excluded from the unit count).

2. Th
e developer shall be required to enter into an affordable housing agreement that will be recorded on the property with the following terms:
a. I
f the developer owns and rents all units in the project then one (1) unit shall be reserved for rent to a very low -income (50% of Area Median Income) household at the City’s affordable rent limit for that unit, subject to the City’s marketing, leasing and property management requirements for Below Market Rate rentals.
b. T
he affordability restrictions will be secured through a regulatory agreement between the City and the developer recorded on the property. c. I
f any of the units in the project are sold or transferred, then the project will be subject to the City’s for -sale affordability requirement of 1.95 units. One unit shall be restricted for sale to a low-income (80% of Area Median Income) household at the City’s affordable for -sale price and the remaining fractional unit (.95) shall be paid through the in- lieu fee per the Affordable Housing Ordinance.

EXHIBIT B
257
G. FIRE DEPARTMENT

The Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building/civil drawings for conceptual on-site fire mains and fire hydrant locations only. Plan check comments and approval.

Confirm at Building Permit Plan Check with Fire Department:

1. Installation of the on-site fire mains and fire hydrants. Specific installation drawings submitted by the licensed underground fire protection contractor shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval; and

2. Backflow prevention or connections to the public water mains.

1. FIRE HAZARDS: The project developer shall keep the site free of fire hazards from the start of lumber construction until the final inspection.

2. FIRE CODE: All construction shall conform to the requirements of the 2022 Pleasanton Fire Code and local ordinances. All required permits shall be obtained prior to work commencement.

3. SITE SAFETY: Site safety during construction shall be in accordance with Fire Code chapter 33.

4. FIRE SPRINKLERS: Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in all occupancies in accordance with the 2022 Pleasanton Building, Fire and Residential Codes with local amendments and ordinances.

5. EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO: Emergency responder radio coverage shall be provided in accordance with section 510 of the Fire Code.

6. FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES: Prior to any construction framing, the applicant shall provide adequate fire protection facilities, including, but not limited to a water supply and water flow in conformance to the City's Fire Department Standards able to suppress a major fire.

7. WATER FLOW AND CONTROL VALVES: All fire sprinkler system water flow and control valves shall be complete and serviceable prior to final inspection. Prior to the occupancy of a building having a fire alarm system, the Fire Department shall test and witness the operation of the fire alarm system.

8. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT: Electrical conduit shall be provided to each fire protection system control valve including all valve(s) at the water connections. The Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department requires electronic supervision of all valves for automatic sprinkler systems and fire protection systems.

EXHIBIT B
258

9. LISTED: All commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential occupancies shall have valve tamper and water flow connected to a listed Central Station Service in accordance with NFPA 72. Fire Department plan check includes specifications, monitoring, installation, and alarm company certificates. Fire alarm control panel and remote annunciation shall be at location(s) approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. All systems shall be point identified by individual device and annunciated by device type and point.

10. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Should any operation or business activity involve the use, storage or handling of hazardous materials, the firm shall be responsible for contacting the Livermore- Pleasanton Fire Department prior to commencing operations. Please contact the Hazardous Materials Coordinator at 925/454-2361.

11. FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants shall be installed at spacing not greater than 300 feet in industrial and commercial developments. Fire hydrants shall be installed at spacing not greater than 400 feet in residential developments.

12. FIRE LANE MARKING: On -site access ways, turn arounds, and internal drives shall be designated as fire lanes and identified as such by red curb striping and posted with signs at locations approved by the Fire Department. Signs shall be according to State standards and read “No Parking – Fire Lane” and must be shown on the plans. The red curb striping, sign location(s), and sign language shall be included in the building permit submittal for review and approval by the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department prior to building permit issuance.

a. The following schedule for NO PARKING signs shall apply:

Width Requirements
36 feet or greater No requirements
Between 28 and 36 feet Post one side
Between 20 and 28 feet Post both sides
Less than 20 feet Not permitted
Cul-de-Sac Not permitted

13. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROADS: Access roads shall have 13 feet, 6 inches unobstructed vertical clearance, 20 feet of unobstructed width (26 feet where occupied building floors exceed 30 feet height), and inside turning radius of 31 feet and outside turning radius of 51 feet. Unobstructed shall mean a clear travel way, excluding parking width, and designed for an emergency vehicle weight of 70,000 pounds under all weather conditions. Unobstructed width shall not include the width of rolled curbs, sidewalks, or non- drivable surfaces. All exterior portions of buildings must be within 200 feet of an access road. Yard and parking area may be able to be located farther than 200 feet from access roads, depending on the specific use.

EXHIBIT B
259

14. FIRE VEHICLE TURNAROUNDS: Where Fire Department vehicle access through or around a site involves changes in direction or curves, inside radius of 45 feet and outside radius of 55 feet shall be provided to facilitate fire truck turning radius for entry and exit from the site. Dead-end access ways and internal drives shall not exceed 300 feet in length and shall terminate in cul -de-sacs no less than 96 feet in diameter or hammer -head (tee). Standards and options are available through the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department, Fire Prevention Bureau.

15. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Address numbers shall be installed on the front or primary entrance for all buildings. Minimum building address character size shall be 12- inch high by 1 -inch stroke. In all cases address numerals shall be of contrasting background and clearly visible in accordance with the Livermore- Pleasanton Fire Department Premises Identification Standards. This may warrant field verification and adjustments based upon topography, landscaping or other obstructions.

16. RESIDENTIAL – NEW CONSTRUCTION: The following items shall be provided prior to any construction above the foundation or slab.

a. Emergency vehicle access shall be provided to the site (tract), including areas where construction is occurring.
b. Designated construction material storage and construction worker parking shall not obstruct the emergency vehicle access route(s). c. On-site fire hydrants shall be in service. Fire hydrants shall be flushed and all valves open.

17. FINAL INSPECTION: Prior to request for final inspection, all access roads, on-site access and fire hydrants shall be provided. All fire hydrants shall be accepted, inspected and tested to applicable City Standards.

EXHIBIT B
260
DAT
E: May 21, 2025
ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS - EXHIBIT "A"
(Subject to revision prior to final approval by Planning Commission) T
ENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 11527 - (SUB20-004), SPDR21-001, PD25-001 L
OCATION: 3541 East Avenue @ Dolores St
APPLICANT: Frank Abboud
Note: Special conditions are shown in standard type. Standard conditions that apply to this project are shown in italics. In addition, standard conditions of approval for this project are listed in Section II of the Development Plan Check and Procedures Manual.

1. DEFINITIONS
Fo
r the purpose of this agreement, the following words shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:

Developer : Person(s) or Corporation(s) signing final map(s) and subdivision agreement(s)
Improvement Plans: Construction drawings for required public and private improvements Services: Utility lateral, or any portions of a conduit cable or duct, between a utility distribution line and the site it serves
Project: The work to be performed by Developer

2. TENTATIVE MAP
Approval or conditional approval of this tentative map shall not limit the City Engineer's ability to require workable designs on future grading and improvement plans based upon these Engineering Considerations and the City's standard engineering specifications and details.

3. GENERAL
The project shall be in conformance with all City Ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies. The conditions listed below are particularly pertinent to this permit and shall not be construed to permit violation of other laws and policies not so listed.

All required improvements shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the new residential units on this site.

EXHIBIT B
261

A. IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Exhibit A-1

An engineered improvement plan shall be prepared by the Developer for approval by the City's Departments (including the Community Development, Public Works, Fire, and Police Department), which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, existing site conditions, dedications, grading plans, street design and grades, curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveway grades, and type, size and location of all public works improvements as herein required. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the details shown thereon. If there is any conflict between the tentative map and these Engineering Considerations, the Engineering Considerations shall govern.

No specific phased development plan has been submitted with this tentative parcel map application.

Therefore, all required improvements for this tentative map shall be constructed as one phase. A phased map could only be considered if a specific phasing plan is submitted for consideration as a tentative map amendment.

B. STANDARDS FOR IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND MAPS

All improvement plans and maps shall conform to the following City of Livermore documents except as modified by these engineering considerations:

1. City of Livermore Standard Specifications and Details – Current edition

2. Development Plan Check and Procedures Manual – Current edition

Completed final map and improvement plan checklists from the manual entitled "City of Livermore, Development Plan Check and Procedures Manual" shall be submitted with the first plan check submittal for each phase.

C. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

CHECK AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

All of the standard conditions of approval for subdivisions and major projects as listed in Part II of the City of Livermore Development Plan Check and Procedures Manual apply except for the following: B-3, B-4, B-8, B-9, B-12, B-13, B-14, C-8, C-9, C-10, C-11, C-12, C-13, C-14, C-15, C- 16, C-17, C-18, C-23, J-1, J-2, L-1, L-2, L-3, P-1, P-2, P-3, and P-4

4. STREETS

A. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:

The Developer shall offer easements and dedications for, and shall improve his share of the ultimate street widths for the following named streets in accordance with the City's General Plan:

East Avenue

East Avenue is a major street in the General Plan. The City plans on making future improvements on

EXHIBIT B
262
East Avenue in accordance with the East Avenue Corridor Project. To facilitate this future work the Developer shall contribute $50,000 to the project to pay for their fair share of intersection improvements at East Avenue and Dolores Street. This contribution will be due prior to the filing of the final parcel map.

The Developer shall remove the existing driveway on East Avenue and reconstruct the curb, gutter and sidewalk at this location.

Dolores Street
Dolores Street is a residential street that is fully built out along the project frontage.

The Developer shall remove the existing driveway on Dolores Street and reconstruct the curb, gutter and sidewalk at this location. The Developer shall construct a new driveway providing access into the project as shown on the tentative map.

Dolores Street along the project boundary shall be given a 1-1/2" A.C. overlay across the full width.

Key cutting will be required at the conform points and along the gutter.

To accommodate future improvements to be made by the City with the East Avenue Corridor Project, Dolores Street shall be resigned to eliminate on street parking along the project frontage.

Interior Street
The interior street shall be a private street comprised of a 20’ right-of-way width with no on-street parking except where guest parking stalls are located per the tentative map. This private street shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association for the project or property owner, as applicable.

The Developer shall design and construct a portion of the interior street as an emergency vehicle access and shall be designed to withstand a vehicle loading of 75,000 lbs. An Emergency Vehicle Access Easement (EVAE) shall be dedicated to the City on the final map over the interior street where the EVAE will be located.

Additionally, prior to the start of framing for any buildings, full street sections shall be installed to provide access for emergency vehicles during construction of the buildings. Full street sections shall include installation of fire hydrants, utilities and curb and gutters, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Fire Marshall.

CASp Certification for Public Walkways/Sidewalks
The Developer shall have a certified CASp Specialist review and certify that the design for all pedestrian improvements within the public right-of-way or a public easement complies with the following applicable regulations: American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, the Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), and the requirements found in Chapter 11B of the 2019 California Building Code. If an accessibility design cannot meet the above listed applicable standards, the Developer shall propose and the CASp Specialist shall concur with a

EXHIBIT B
263
design exception request for approval by the City Engineer or their designee. In addition, the Developer shall have the certified CASp Specialist inspect and certify that pedestrian improvements are installed per the CASp certified design. Pedestrian improvements include new trails, walkways, sidewalks, accessible ramps, connections between existing and new pedestrian improvements, and modifications to existing pedestrian improvements within or adjacent to the project site, as shown on the approved plans.

5. TRAFFIC SIGNALS – Not used

6. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE CREDITS AND REIMBURSEMENTS – Not Used

7. SANITARY SEWERS

Because the Developer has chosen to install enhanced specialty paving (i.e. pavers, stamped concrete, stamped asphalt, etc.) instead of City standard asphalt street section, the sanitary sewers in the private streets will be privately-owned by a homeowner’s association and maintained to the two-way cleanouts. In order to differentiate the ownership of public and private facilities, the Developer shall provide the additional structures (manholes and or cleanouts) to be installed at the property line.

Sewer shall be extended across all frontages of each phase.

Sewer laterals with two way cleanouts behind the curb shall be installed to each lot or site before the streets are surfaced.

8. STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS

A. General

1. This site is subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program.

Prior to the issuance of the initial grading or building permit, the Developer shall provide evidence that the site is covered by the statewide General Permit to Discharge Storm Water associated with construction activity. This requires confirmation that a Notice of Intent (NOI) and the applicable fee was sent to the State Water Resources Control Board. In addition, the grading plans need to state:
"All grading shall be in accordance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by the Developer per the Notice of Intent on file with the State Water Resources Control Board".

2. Necessary interceptor ditches shall be concrete. Field inlets and storm drainage pipe may be necessary in conjunction with concrete interceptor ditches as secondary drainage releases. All interceptor ditches shall be privately maintained.

B. Storm Drainage Requirements

Per the City’s Facilities Planning Guidelines (dated June 2005), the flows must have the following characteristics:

EXHIBIT B
264
For a 10-year design discharge: a hydraulic grade line (HGL) is no higher than 1.25 feet below the top of curb elevation at any manhole or inlet.

For a 100-year design discharge: a HGL does not exceed the top of curb elevation.

For additional detail on these guidelines, the applicant should refer to the following resources:

City of Livermore Storm Drain Master Plan & City of Livermore Facilities Planning Guidelines (both available at the Engineering counter at City Hall).

Since the Developer has chosen to build private streets, the storm drain system will be privately owned and maintained by a homeowner’s association and maintained to the property line. In order to differentiate the ownership of public and private facilities, the Developer shall provide the additional structures (manholes and or catch basins) to be installed at the property line.

C. Stormwater Infrastructure Maintenance Funding
The cost to maintain all private storm water infrastructure installed with this project shall be funded by the Developer.

D. Channels – Not Used

E. Storm Water Treatment, Detention and Low Impact Development Requirements

1. The Developer shall treat the storm water runoff from this site prior to having the storm water enter the City’s storm water distribution system. Stormwater Treatment, Low Impact Development, and Trash Capture is required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The Developer shall complete and or update the Stormwater Requirements Checklist. The Developer shall provide a storm water treatment plan with calculations indicating treatment that meets the latest requirements described in Section C.3 of the City’s NPDES Permit with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. City approval of this plan and calculations is required prior to the approval of the improvement plans.

2. If this project is greater than one acre, the Developer shall provide a Hydrograph Modification Plan (HMP) with calculations in accordance with the Alameda Countywide Cleanwater Program (ACCWP) Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM) guidelines. The software for the design of control measures to meet the Flow Duration Control is available to download from www.bayareamodel.org. For additional information you may contact Debbie Salgado in the City’s Engineering Department at (925-960-4558)

3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City of Livermore for all storm water treatment devices deemed necessary on this site. If the stormwater treatment devices will be maintained by the individual homeowners a cleanout will be necessary at the property lines to allow the residents to maintain their portion of the private storm drain underdrain. If the stormwater treatment device will be maintained by a Homeowners Association then the cleanouts at each of the property lines may not be needed.

The storm drain treatment devices shall be shown on the plat plans and included in the

EXHIBIT B
265
Operations and Maintenance Agreement. The Operations and Maintenance Agreement(s) shall be recorded prior to recordation of the Final Map.

F. Stormwater Treatment Infrastructure Maintenance Funding The cost to maintain all storm water treatment, detention and low impact development infrastructure installed with this project shall be funded by the Developer.

9. REQUIRED SOURCE CONTROL STORMWATER MEASURES
See Section Y of the of the Development Plan Check & Procedure Manual for requirements.

10. WATER SUPPLY (CAL WATER)

Water mains shall be extended across all frontages of each phase. Any water service that is to be abandoned or that was previously stubbed out to the site but will not be used by the development, shall be removed by the Developer.

All water system designs, including water service laterals, shall be approved by Cal Water prior to final map approval.

The fire service backflow preventer(s) shall be effectively screened from the public right-of-way while at the same time preserving ease of maintenance access to the backflow preventer(s).

Screening shall be as specified on City Standard Detail W-10A, B and C. The fire service backflow preventer(s) shall meet the performance standards of the backflow preventer shown in City Standard Detail W-10A, B and C.

11. UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES:

All existing and new electric (with the exception of any 60 KV and higher voltage wires) and communication lines along the project frontage and within the project shall be placed underground.

Electric, gas, Comcast and SBC utilities are required and shall be placed in a common trench. All electric transformers shall be placed underground.

12. TRAILWAY/BIKEWAY REQUIREMENTS

Active Transportation Plan

Certain portions of this development are within the City of Livermore Active Transportation Plan (ATP) established and adopted as part of the General Plan. The City will be constructing improvements consistent with the ATP with East Avenue Corridor project in the future. The Developer will be providing funds that will a contribute to the construction of this project in the future. See East Avenue requirements above.

EXHIBIT B
266

13. MEDIANS AND OTHER LANDSCAPED AREAS – Not used

14. HORTICULTURIST'S REPORT – Not used

15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS – Not used

16. AIRPORT LOCATION – Not used

17. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AND SECURITY
Following tentative map approval, the Subdivision Improvement Agreement will not be submitted to the City Council until the Developer has submitted all of the documents indicated in the “Final Approval of Tract Map Checklist” in the Development Plan Check and Procedures Manual (28) days prior to the city council meeting at which the final map will be considered for final approval by the City Council.

18. FEE AMOUNTS

The Developer will be required to pay the applicable development impact fees and project processing fees due in connection with this subdivision. The fee shall be the amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid.

19. VEHICLE ACCESS

Prior to or with the submittal for the first plan check of the tract improvement plans and final map, the Developer shall submit for review and approval a traffic control plan for providing safe entry to and exit from the site. The purpose of the plan is to insure that there will be safe entry and exit by construction and other vehicles prior to the installation of the required permanent improvements on Dolores Street.

If this plan requires the construction of improvements on Dolores Street, then these improvements shall be constructed prior to the beginning of any on-site work.

Access to the development by construction equipment, material delivery and other heavy loads shall be limited by the Developer to the following route:

I-580, North Livermore Avenue to South Livermore Avenue to East Avenue to Dolores Street

Such heavy loads will not be allowed on existing residential streets in the vicinity of the development.

The wheel-loading on the above routes shall not exceed State load limits.

20. DEVELOPMENTS WITH PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND UTILITIES
(Condominiums, Row Houses, Cluster, etc.)

EXHIBIT B
267

The private improvements of the private street system are part of the improvements required of this subdivision. For this reason, the Developer shall pay Engineering Division plan check and construction inspection fees and the City Engineering Division will provide these services. The Developer will also provide subdivision security for the required private improvements.

Developer shall also provide proof of PG&E final approval of the project plans prior to Final Map approval, including approved PG&E plans to be submitted to the City.

DES

EC Parcel Map 11527 (SUB20-004) 5-21-25

EXHIBIT B
268

1 ORDINANCE NO. _____

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) 25-001

On June 14, 2020, the City received an application for Planned Development (PD) 25- 001, Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21 -001, and Subdivision (SUB) 20 -004 to redevelop the approximately 0.62-acre site with a two-story, attached, 13-unit multi-family, townhome- style development (“Project”). The Project will consist of all rental units that would be grouped on one lot. The units will include three and four bedroom plans that range in size from 1,400 to 1,900 square feet , plus one Accessory Dwelling Unit . Each primary unit will have an attached two-car garage. The Project will reconstruct the curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the project’s frontages (East Avenue and Dolores Street), underground all utilities, and construct a new shared driveway to access the site from Dolores Street.

On June 17, 2025, the Planning C ommission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project and staff recommendations, heard public testimony, and findings, and made the necessary findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recommendation. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on June 17, 2025, to consider Planned Development (PD) 25-001 and recommended that the City Council approve the Planned Development as referenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 23-25, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 2. Environmental. The City Council considered the environmental review and found the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Projects).

Section 3. Consistency. The ordinance is consistent with the Livermore General Plan and the Livermore Development Code and will serve the public necessity, convenience and welfare for the reasons set forth in the agenda materials associated with the project and the City Council adopts such reasons as its own.

Section 4. Findings and Adoption. The City Council of the City of Livermore has reviewed and considered the written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council considered the findings made i n Planning Commission Resolution No. 23 -25, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as part of this Ordinance. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby approves Planned Development (PD) 25 -001, attached hereto as Exhibit B, for the Abboud Townhomes Project.

Section 5. Zoning Standards. The zoning standards for this district shall be those set forth in the Planned Development (PD) 25-001, attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Section 6. Publication and Effective Date. This ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of 269

2 ORDINANCE NO. _____
Livermore within fifteen (15) days after its adoption and shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

Section 7. Filing. The Planning Manager is directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Clerk.

Section 8. Documents. The d ocuments that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, California.

Section 9. Severability. If any part of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any remaining parts.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Livermore held on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council held on ______________________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Mayor, City of Livermore

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

___________________________ /s/ Christine Crowl
Deborah L. Elam Christine Crowl
City Clerk Special Counsel

Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 23-25

2. Exhibit B – Planned Development (PD) 25-001
270

EXHIBIT A
271

EXHIBIT A
272

EXHIBIT A
273
Planned Development – Residential (PD-R) 25-001
Genera
l Note: the drawings and photos are illustrative.

The purpose of establishing this Planned Development
District is to regulate residential townhouse building
type
development of Tentative Parcel Map 11527
("Exhibit A" and APNs 98A-610-1-2 and 98A-610-2)
approximately 0.62± acres of land located at the
southeast quadrant of East Avenue and Dolores Street.

Development shall be in conformance with the
requirements of the Livermore Development Code
(
LDC) as it exists now or may be amended in the
future, except as modified by the following regulations.

A. Purpose B. Allowed Building Types

EXHIBIT B
274
D
C
B
max.

B
min.

A
A max.
min.

Front
Key
ROW / Property Line
Setback Line
C. Building Placement
Building Area
Facade Zone
ROW Line Street
Setback (Distance from ROW / Property Line)
Front A
Minimum 1,2 Lesser of adjacent
property’s or 15'
Maximum 3 30'
Front facade 4 within facade
zone 50% min.

Side Street 5 10' min.; 15' max. B
Side 6 C 5' min.

Rear 5' min. D
1 On development’s interior streets, refer to side street setback.
2 5' min.
3 No maximum front setback for Carriage houses.
4 Garages shall not be counted as part of the front facade. 5 Can be reduced with approval of an SPDR in the First
Street Transitional Area depicted in 3.02.080.H.
6 No side setback required between Townhouse and/or
Live/Work building types.

Distance between Main Buildin
gs on Same Lot
1 Story 8' min.
2+ Stories 15' min.

See Part 5 (Building Typ
es).

Building Height 7, 8, 9
Stories 2-½ stories max
To Eave or Parapet 24' max.

Overall 35' max.

Ground Floor Finish Level 18" min. above sidewalk H
Ground Floor Ceiling 9' min. clear I
Upper Floor(s) Ceiling 8' min. clear J
7 Does not apply to accessory structures. See 4.02.030
(Accessory Structures)
8 See Part 5 (Building Types) for additional height
regulations.
9 For First Street Corridor Transition Area, see 3.02.080.H.

Mansard roof forms ar
e not allowed.

Upper-floor units must have a primary ent rance along a street facade or to a courtyard.

Ground
-floor residential units facing a street shall have
individual entries.

LDC § 5.01.090.G. is modified to allow a minimum 18' and a maximum 44'
building width per townhouse unit.

Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
D. Building Form
E
J
E
I
H
Side Street
A

EXHIBIT B
275
J
I
F. Frontage Types and Encroachments

Front
Key
ROW / Property Line
Setback Line
Encroac hment Area
Key
ROW / Property Line
Setback Line
Allowed Parking Area
Groun
d Floor 1 Residential
Upper Floor 1 Residential
1 See 3.02.080.I (T4N Use Table) for specific use
Residen
tial Uses
Studio or 1 Bedroom 1 space/unit min.
2+ Bedrooms 2 spaces/unit min.

Front 8' m
ax. I
Side Street or Civic Space 8' max. J
Side 0' max.

Rear
Property Line 0' max.

Rear Lane 3' max.
2 Encroachments are not allowed within a Street ROW.

See 4.02.020.B (Encroachments) for complete list of
allowed encroachments.

Front
Covered or Attached Match front facade
+ width of garage
min.

Uncovered Match front facade
min. N
Side Street 5' min. O
Side 0' min. P
Rear 0' min. Q
Porch Fore
court
Stoop
3 See 4.03 (Frontage Standards) for descriptions and
regulations.

Linea
r feet of front or side facade
that may be gara ge 35% max.

Tandem parking is allowed for off-street parking only if both spaces are behind the required setback and are for the same residential unit.

See Chapter 4.04 (Parking Standards) for additional
general parking requirements.

Rear
E. Allowed Use Types
Miscellaneous
G. Required Parking
M
Rear
Q
P
O
M
Front
N
Required Frontage Types 3
Side Street
Side Street

EXHIBIT B
276

Bed & Breakfast 6.02.010 ZUP
Child Day Care Facility 6.02.020
Small family day care home P
Large family day care home ZUP
Family day care center CUP

(Ord. 2082 § 2(C), 2019; Ord. 2058 § 1 (Exh. C), 2017;
Ord. 2018 § 4 (Exh. B), 2015)

P Permitted Use
CUP Conditional Use Permit Required
HOP Home Occupation Permit Required
ZUP Zoning Use Permit Required
— Use Not Allowed
End Notes
1 A definition of each listed use type is in Part 11.
2 Uses not listed are specifically prohibited, unless
Director determines use is consistent pursuant to the
Code.
3 A Zoning Clearance is required for new units and
additions.
4 Permitted only if already legally existing at time of Code adoption, 05/01/10.

I. T4N Use Table
Services: General
Community Gardens
P
Park, Playground
Public and Quasi-Public
School, Private

6.02.090
P
CUP
CUP
Dwelling: Single-family4
Dwelling: Townhouse,
Courtyard Apartment,
Multiple-family units
Supportive Housing
Transitional Housing
Home Occupation
Residential Accessory Use or
Structure
Health Facility:

Residential care, 1 - 6 clients
Residential care, 7 or more
clients
P

6.02.060
P
P
P
HOP
P

6.02.050
P
CUP

Specific Use Permit
Regulations Required
Land Use Type 1, 2
Residential3
Public Assembly
Land Use Type 1, 2 Specific Use Permit
Regulations Required
Key

EXHIBIT B
277
"Exhibit A"

EXHIBIT B
278

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 8.1

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT:

Resolution approving an amendment to the City Manager's employment contract.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Evaluation Subcommittee recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the City Manager's employment contract.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
The City Manager's contract stipulates under Section V.A. that the City Council shall conduct an annual performance review of the City Manager and determine any modifications to the terms and conditions of employment including any salary increase, bonus, or other benefit changes.

DISCUSSION
The current City Manager employment contract dated October 31, 2023, indicates the City Council shall review the performance of the City Manager annually and may make modifications to terms and conditions of employment, as deemed appropriate based on performance of duties. As such, the City Council met in Closed Session with the City Manager on October 13, 2025, to discuss her performance evaluation. Prior to that discussion, the City Manager, via memo to the City Council, requested modifications to terms and conditions relevant to her employment contract. At the Closed Session, the City Council discussed the City Manager's request and directed that the draft amendment to the City Manager's employment contract be placed upon this agenda for City Council consideration.

Council approval would be the second amendment to the current contract dated October 31, 2023, to add the following material change: provide an increased contribution of $327.85 per pay period ($8,524 annually) to the City Manager’s deferred compensation. In addition, the City Manager's existing contract already grants the same annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) that is provided to the Livermore 279
Managers Group (LMG), which is 6% in 2025 bringing the City Manager's annual base salary to $392,895. The contract amendment will be effective November 17, 2025.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS

The additional annual net salary and benefits cost $30,763, which will be paid from the General Fund. No additional appropriation is required at this time.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

5: A City that Works

GOAL

8: Attract, develop, engage, and retain a diverse and highly skilled workforce across the organization.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - City Manager Contract

Prepared by: Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2025 AMENDMENT TO THE CITY
MANAGER’S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

On October 31, 2023, the City Council entered into an employment contract with City Manager, Marianna A. Burch. Pursuant to the employment contract, the City Council conducted the City Manager’s annual performance evaluation on October 13, 2025, and evaluated modifications to terms and conditions of employment presented by the City Manager after the performance evaluation.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that it hereby:

1. Approves modifications to the terms and conditions of the employment contract for the Cit y Manager, effective November 17, 2025, as described more fu lly in the 2025 Amendment to the City Manager’s Employment Contract, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

2. Authorizes the Mayor, on behalf of the City of Livermore, to execute the 2025 Amendment to the City Manager’s Employment Contract.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Kimberly Cilley
Deborah L. Elam Kimberly Cilley
City Clerk City Attorney

281

EXHIBIT A
282

EXHIBIT A
283

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 11.1

3.1 Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District update presented by Ryan Clausnitzer, General Manager, and Dr. Maya Manoharan, Livermore Trustee

Materials: PowerPoint Presentation, Update for Livermore

3.3 Airport Commission Annual Update to City Council presented by Chair Darin Bishop and Benedict Stuth, Airport Manager.

Material: PowerPoint Presentation

5.0 Open Forum

Material: Public Comment

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Marianna A. Burch, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Supplemental materials received prior to the meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

DECISION TYPE
Not Applicable

SUMMARY
These materials were posted online and made available to the public at the same time that they were distributed to the City Council.

284

6.4 Resolutions authorizing execution of a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and authorizing, subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund 621 in the FY 2025-26 budget and execution of an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026, to provide engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

Materials: PowerPoint Presentation; Revised: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement

7.1 THIS PREVIOUSLY NOTICED ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 24, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Hearing to consider a request to approve a Planned Development (PD) 25-001, Subdivision (SUB) 20-004, and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 to allow a two-story, attached, 13-unit multi-family, townhome-style development located at 3541 East Avenue.

Material: Public Comments

8.1 Resolution approving an amendment to the City Manager's employment contract.

Material: PowerPoint Presentation

9.0 Council Committee Reports and Matters Initiated by City Manager, City Attorney, Staff, and Council Members.

Material: Council Reports

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

1. Supplemental Materials

Prepared by: Ashley Zieba
Assistant City Clerk

Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
285
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
286
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
287
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
288
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
289
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
290
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
291
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
292
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
293
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
294
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
295
Item 3.1
PowerPoint Presentation
296
What are the
biggest mosquito
concerns in
Livermore this
year?
Urban Area:

Rural Area:

Livermore
. ACMAD Update for
106

TECHNICIAN

ASSIGNED TO
THE AREA:

Danny Sharkey
810 2
American crows tested
po
sitive for West Nile virus
38% 29% 24%
Requesting
mosquitofish
Reporting a
mosquito problem
Reporting
standing water
Requests for service
from residents so far
 The most abundant mosquito species this year has been Aed es vexans, the inland floodwater mosquito.
 The top mosquito producing area this year has bee n Del Valle Regional Park.

Mosquito traps placed
through September
Livermore now has several areas with Aedes
aegypti, an aggressive invasive mosquito.

Inspections for this species are complicated
because they require access to resident’s front and
backyards. Additionally, the public’s cooperation in
finding and removing even the smallest amount of
standing water is required for control.

Access in rural areas is often difficult,
whether it’s a large property or natural
area. When water level are low at Lake
Del Valle fish that can eat mosquito larvae
don’t have access to the Aedes vexans
breeding area. Access is further
complicated by overgrown poison oak.

MOSQUITO SPECIES COLLECTED IN LIVERMORE TRAPS BASED ON ABUNDANCE:

Item 3.1
Update for Livermore
297
AVERAGE MOSQUITO ABUNDANCE IN LIVERMORE TRAPS FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS :

Item 3.1
Update for Livermore
298
Item 3.3
PowerPoint Presentation
299
2 Airport Commission
• The Airport Commission is made up of five members
• Term Length: 4 years
• Term Limit: 2 years
• The Commissioners are
• Darin Bishop, Chair
• Christopher Dombrowski, Vice Chair
• Jon Levine
• Victoria Schellenberger
• David Farley
Airport Commission
What We Do
• Established by the City Council “to represent and further the interest of the aviation industry, and that such representation and furtherance will ultimately serve the public interest.” – LMC 2.41.0202 • The Airport Commission:
• Advises the City Council, Planning Commission, and staff on items pertaining to the Livermore Municipal Airport.
• Promotes and supports public interest in the airport through public meetings and events.
• Processes applications for Commercial Aviation Permits and appeals. • Supports Implementation of Council policies, including:
• Hanger Waitlist Policy
• Airport Development Policy
• Airport Protection Area
• Voluntary Noise Monitoring and Abatement Efforts
3 4
Item 3.3
PowerPoint Presentation
300
3 Airport Commission
Past Year’s Activities
• Approval, Advisory, and Community
Outreach Activities at the airport:
• Direction of SMP 39 development
(Advisory).
• Modernization of Noise Reports and
Noise Reporting Procedure
(Advisory) to create efficiencies and
public availability.
• Airport Land Use and Development
Analysis (Advisory).
• Support for City of Livermore 4th of
July Celebration at LVK.
• Continued Fly Quiet, Fly Friendly
program (Advisory).

Airport Commission
2025/2026 Goals
• Continue to advise the Council, Planning Commission, and staff on matters pertaining to the Airport.
• Proactively promote the Airport as a community asset. • Review and suggest improvements to operations focused on efficiency and effectiveness.
• Continue to support implementation of Council policies • Support the implementation of the Airport Development Strategy.
5 6
Item 3.3
PowerPoint Presentation
301
4 Airport Commission
Airport Development Strategy
• The Airport Development Strategy includes the
following:
• Develop an approach for constructing and tenanting hangars to address the hangar wait lists.
• Explore the creation of a Multi-Agency Public Safety Complex to improve regional emergency and disaster response.
• Establish an Aviation Innovation Center for the development of clean and quiet aviation technologies.
• Pursue advanced aviation technologies (such as eVTOL) to help improve mobility and facilitate advancement in clean, quiet transportation
Questions?
7 8
Item 3.3
PowerPoint Presentation
302
1 Ashley Zieba
From: k l
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 5:50 AM
To: City Clerk
Subject: Agenda topic for next meeting
Categories: Ashley, Debbie, Public Comment
Exercise CauƟon: This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or aƩachments from untrusted sources.

Hello,
I’d like to comment on the growing homeless encampment oﬀ the freeway going east, just before the N Livermore exit.

There seems to be a growing area of tents and tarps in the greenery oﬀ of the highway, quite close to apartments and right across the freeway from the pumpkin patch.

What is being done about this growing issue? As this area is brushy and dry (ﬁre hazard already), and we have had ﬁre issues in the area, I’m concerned for safety. We have also noƟced an increase in the homeless populaƟon around town, clearly under the inﬂuence of substances (yelling, lunging, or passed out at all hours of the day) near the Portola/N Livermore area. It feels unsafe to walk around with dogs or children even during the dayƟme, and as the weather gets colder there is a concern about spreading ﬁres as well (several have been reported in that area recently).

Thank you,
Kristen
Item 5.0
Public Comment
303
Item 6.4
PowerPoint Presentation
304
2 Future Sewer Project Alignment
Proposed
Alignment
Additional
segment for study
Agreement Terms
Alameda County Cooperative Funding Agreement:
 County will reimburse the City up to $700,000
 Covers Consultant engineering services and City’s project management  Requires Supplemental appropriation to the City’s FY 2025–26 CIP Wastewater Fund
Consultant Contract:
 City would contract with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for up to $629,000 to be reimbursed by County
 Work scope includes: topographic surveys, preliminary engineering analysis, and public engagement
 Final Basis of Design Report to be completed by December 31, 2026 3 4
Item 6.4
PowerPoint Presentation
305
3 Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council adopt two resolutions authorizing:
• The City Manager to execute a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project; and
• A supplemental appropriation of $700,000, to the CIP Wastewater Fund (Fund 621) in the FY 2025-26 budget (subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement).
• The City Manager to execute an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 to prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project. 5 Item 6.4
PowerPoint Presentation
306

COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR

DEVELOPMENT OF A BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT AND RELATED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE SOUTH LIVERMORE

VALLEY SEWER EXTENSION PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of _______ _ 2025, by and between the County of Alameda , "COUNTI" and the City of Livermore, a municipal corporation of the State of California, "CI1Y", collectively the "Parties ".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the area depicted in Exhibit A is in the unincorporated area of the COUNTY and is known as the South Livermore Valley. The South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project ("Project ") is situated in the northeast portion of the South Livermore Valley, as shown in Exhibit A.

WHEREAS, the South Livermore Valley is beyond the CI1Y's municipal and urban growth boundaries.

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, the CI1Y adopted the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project ("Project ") Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and authorized amendments to the City's South Livermore Valley Urban Growth Boundary Initiative, to address groundwater concerns and allow for continued commercial and visitor serving development in the unincorporated area of COUNTY.

WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Livermore voters approved amendments to the City's South Livermore Valley Urban Growth Boundary Initiati ve (Measure P).

WHEREAS, The location of the Project is generally shown by red and blue lines on Exhibit B.

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to retain a project manager and to obtain topographic survey and engineering analysis to help develop a cost-effective basis of design report ("BOD Report ") for the Project to include recommended pipe alignment and depth, locations (if any) where pump or lift stations would be needed and preliminary cost estimates for the Project's construction, operation , and maintenance.

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Cooperation Agreement ("Agreement ") for project management , surveying, engineering analysis, and preparation of the BOD Report for the Project. The scope for this work is shown in Exhibit C-1 and Exhibit C-2.

WHEREAS, this Agreement specifies the method of cooperation between the Parties which includes terms and conditions under which the CI1Y will provide project management , surveying, engineering analysis, and preparation of the BOD Report for the Project and the COUNTY will reimburse the City for reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the CI1Y for these services, which is estimated to be and not exceeding Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 307
$700.000 and includes consultant fees, CI1Y project management costs, and contingency.

WHEREAS, there will be strict accountability by the City of all funds transacted and a report of all receipts and distributions shall be made upon request by the County and at the conclusion of the preparation of the BOD Report. CI1Y shall provide a report to COUNTY documenting all expenditures made by CI1Y for project management and BOD Report.

WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CI1Y desire to specify the terms and conditions under which the BOD Report shall be provided.

WHEREAS, this Agreement does not address issues including final design, bid documents, construction, ownership and maintenance, flow and strength monitoring of the added sewage to be conveyed by the Project, costs to connect the Project and discharge to the CI1Y's existing sewer system, and for treatment at the CI1Y's Water Reclamation Plant.

WHEREAS, this Agreement does not obligate the CI1Y or the COUNTY to perform any work on the Project subsequent to the BOD Report including but not limited to annexation or connection of properties, design, real property acquisition, permitting, construction, operation or maintenance or the costs thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, the COUNTY and CI1Y agree as follows:

SECTION I: CI1Y COVENANTS
CI1Y AGREES TO:

A. Complete the scope of work to develop the BOD Report as outlined in Exhibit C-1.

CI1Y will contract with an engineering consultant that specializes in sewer design and operation for this work.

B. Provide project management services as outlined in Exhibit C-2.

C. Manage the procurement of any goods or services required under this Agreement based on a competitive bidding process and comply with all requirements applicable to "public works," including, without limitation, those contained in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I of the California Labor Code (Section 1720, et seq.).

D. Ensure that any consultants performing project management, design, and administrative services in connection with the Project secure and maintain in full force and effect, general liability, workers compensation, and auto liability insurance in forms and limits ofliability acceptable to CI1Y and COUN1Y, which insurance names CI1Y and COUNTY and their officers, employees, and agents as an additional insured from and against all damages, claims, loss, liability, and cost or expense arising out of or in any way connected with the Improvements. 2 Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 308
E. Complete the BOD Report within seven months of the date that CITY issues a notice to proceed to the consultant.

F. Maintain cost accounting for the work outlined in this Agreement.

SECTION II: COUNTY COVENANTS
COUNTY AGREES TO:

A. Reimburse CITY for up to $700,000 within 30 days of the receipt of an invoice for authorized costs incurred by CITY pursuant to this Agreement. This funding will pay up to $569,094 for consultant fees, $71,000 for CITY project management, and reserve $59,906 as a contingency.

B. Coordinate with CITY during preparation of the BOD Report, including reviewing draft analysis and reports, and attending project development team meetings, as needed.

SECTION III: INDEMNITY
A. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, COUNTY shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend with counsel selected by COUNTY and reasonably acceptable to CITY, the CITY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney's fees and costs and fees oflitigation) (collectively, "Liability") arising out of or in connection with COUNTY's performance of services contemplated by this Agreement, or in connection with COUNTY's failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY or its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, and agents. COUNTY's obligations to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend shall not be excused because of COUNTY's inability to evaluate Liability or because COUNTY evaluates Liability and determines that COUNTY is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

COUNTY will endeavor to respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by CITY.
1) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a "construction contract" covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then COUNTY's duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
3 Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 309
2) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for "design professional services" defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, then COUNTY's duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a) , unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

B. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CITY shall hold harmless , indemnify , and defend with counsel selected by CITY and reasonably acceptable to the COUNTY, the COUNTY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors , employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney 's fees and costs and fees oflitigation) (collectively, "Liability") arising out of or in connection with CITY's performance of services contemplated by this Agreement, or in connection with CITY's failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of County or its elected officials, officers, directors, employees, and agents. CITY's obligations to hold harmless , indemnify , and defend shall not be excused because of CITY's inability to evaluate Liability or because CITY evaluates Liability and determines that CITY is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. CITY will endeavor to respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by COUNIY.
1) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a "construction contract " covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then CITY's duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
2) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for "design professional services" defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8 , then CITY's duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782 .8(a), unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

C. Risk Management Procedure/Insurance: Promptl y upon receipt of any third-party claim or potential legal action concerning this Agreement , the receiving party will notify the other party in writing and provide copies of all relevant information, including the claim, if any.
4 Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 310
In no event may a party to this Agreement prejudice the rights of the other party or settle a claim on behalf of the other party. If the alleged or actual responsibility for a claim is shared by both parties, or the alleged or actual responsible party is uncertain, the parties to this Agreement shall meet and confer to determine how to handle the claim. The parties shall meet and confer via teleconference within thirty (30) calendar days after the claim is presented to the non-receiving party. Failure of the parties to meet and confer within said thirty (30) calendar days does not entitle the parties to settle the claim on behalf of the other party.

This Section III, in its entirety, shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement .

SECTION IV: MISCELLANEOUS
IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED:

A. Termination. That this Agreement shall terminate upon completion of the project management and BOD Report phase of the Project .

B. Amendments. That if, during the term of this Agreement it become s necessary to amend or add to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, any such amendment or addition shall not be binding unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both Parties.

C. Entire Agreement. This instrument , including any attachments hereto , constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and correctly sets forth the rights , duties , and obligations of each party to the other .

D. Partial Invalidity. If any provision or portion of this Agreement shall be deemed invalid, it is agreed that such invalidity shall affect only such provision or portion thereof , and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in force and effect.

E. California Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

F. Headings. The headings used in this Agreement are intended for reference only and do not define or limit the scope or meaning of any provision of this Agreement.

G. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or conditions in this Agreement , no matter how long the failure continues , is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequentl y demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the non breaching party.
5 Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 311
H. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email, or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals and shall be valid and effective for all purposes.

I. Attachments. All attachments referred to in and attached to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.

J. Notices. Any written notice required by this Agreement shall be sent by first-class mail, to the Parties at the addresses set forth below or to such substitute address as may by designated by written notice to the other party:

City of Livermore
Director of Community Development
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
County of Alameda
Director Community Development Agency
224 W. Winton Ave, Rm. 110
Hayward, CA 94544
6 Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 312
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement, the day, month, and year set forth opposite their respective signatures.

CITY OF LIVERMORE
A Municipal Corporation
By:---------
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Date: ________ _
ATTESTED:

By:----------
Deborah L. Elam
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TD FORM:

Kimberly Cille
City Attorne

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
By: ________ _
Sandra Rivera, Director
Community Development Agency
Date: ----------
ATTESTED BY:

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:-----------
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Donna R. Ziegler, County Counsel
By:-----------
Andrea L. Weddle
Chief Assistant County Counsel
By signing above, signatory warrants and represents that they executed this Agreement in their authorized capacity and that by their signature on this Agreement they, or the entity upon behalf of which he/she acted. executed this Agreement.

Attachments: Exhibit A South Livermore Valley Map
Exhibit B Conceptual Project Alignment
Exhibit C-1.BOD Report Scope and Budget
Exhibit C-2 Project Management Scope and Budget
7 Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 313
Exhibit A
~I l ~.-A-.. I ol I / ~
j ) tJY South Livermore Valley Area Pla,n ,
t ' . • G - ' ~ --w- \ / p
,
1 t -='-"'=.--- ~ =- ,~ ll
I
···-··-· '1----·
I
: • • ... r~
t .. , . '~ . .. .
f
i ....... .

I ~ .
'.? ~-- { • -.-
'li1 \
l'. ••• r J::-·
~
1:-,
Map Source: https://www.acgov.org/cda/planning/landuseprojects/documents/SLVAP _Boundary .pdf Project
t
t
I
I
~
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 314
Exhibit B - Project Location
Legend:

Red - City Proposed Alignment
Blue - County Addition to Proposed Alignment
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 315

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

SCOPE OF WORK
9/11/2025
EXHIBIT C-1
The following scope describes all work anticipated to be provided by Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) during the Basis Of Design Phase of the Livermore Sewer Extension Project.

It is assumed that the project includes the following.
• Connecting to the existing 12-inch sewer in East Avenue at Buena Vista Avenue • Extending south along Buena Vista Avenue
• Then east along Tesla Road to Greenville Road
• And then south along Greenville Road to the entrance of JMC Cellars. • As a design alternate, the County has also requested consideration of extending the sewer north along Greenville Road from Tesla Road to the Martinelli Center.

Task 1.0 - Project Management and Meetings
Task 1.1- Project Management: Consultant shall perform project management necessary to plan, execute, monitor, and report the project's progress to the City over an estimated 6-month period.

Consultant shall prepare a monthly progress letter report for attachment to the monthly invoice to track and report status of budget expenditures and key work products completed during the billing period.

Consultant shall maintain a Decision Log to track the impact of decisions made on design, consulting cost, construction cost, and project schedule.

Task 1.2 - Meetings: Consultant will attend and conduct the following meetings with the City:
• Kick-Off Meeting - Consultant will conduct a meeting to review the project goals, scope, schedule, deliverables, and information requests by Consultant . It is assumed that 4 Consultant team members will attend and the in-person meeting will be 2 hours in duration. • PM Progress Meetings - Consultant will conduct 10 meetings to discuss overall work progress and the status of near-term efforts and requirements. It is assumed that 2 Consultant team members will attend and the virtual meetings will be one hour in duration .

For each meeting, Consultant will prepare meeting agenda, meeting presentation materials, and meeting minutes to document key discussion issues, action items, and decisions made.

Information and/or Services Provided by City for Task 1.0:
• Input at meetings .
• Responses to information requests.

Page 1 of 5 ends

Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 316
EXHIBIT C-1
Consultant Deliverables for Task 1.0:
• Updated project design schedule at each design deliverable milestone. • Meeting agenda, presentation materials, and meeting minutes . • Progress letter report with each monthly invoice .

Task 2.0 - Basis of Design
The Basis of Design phase will address several questions that will need to be solved prior to the start of design to set the project off on the right foot . Having answers to these questions will be necessary to avoid inefficiencies and rework during design and problems post construction .

These questions include but are not limited to the following:
• Evaluating the cost of connection vs continued operation of septic systems. • Look for ways to make connecting to the new sewer more financially feasible for property owners (gravity vs grinder pump) .
• Identifying when customers will connect .
• Define flows and loads.
• Identifying impacts to the City's WRP.
• Confirm extended sewer collection system routing and alignment. • Select pipe sizes and material.

Task 2.1- Utility Investigations: Consultant's Surveyor (LCC) will survey the proposed alignment. LCC will establish survey control , provide aerial survey, and conduct supplemental ground surveys and mapping .

Work will also include locating and dipping existing septic tanks and clean outs . Existing utility research and right of way mapping have not been included in this scope but should be completed during preliminary design.

Consultant 's Geotechnical Subconsultant (Crawford) will perform two geotechnical borings to a depth of 30-feet at the canal crossing location to validate the crossing method . Crawford will also provide information to assist in the BDR. Crawford will complete the following:
• Review available geologic and fault mapping;
• Review available groundwater data;
• Review existing geotechnical data including nearby Crawford sites; • Review USDA Web Soil Survey;
• Prepare a Preliminary Geotechnical Memo (Desktop Study) including project and site description; soil and groundwater conditions ; key geotechnical considerations ; seismic consideration including liquefaction potential, fault rupture, seismic settlement; preliminary grading recommendations including use of onsite material for backfill , potential for dewatering, etc; boring logs; existing exploration locations ; and geologic and fault map. The Memo will include a figure that shows the AP Zone and potential areas for liquefaction in the vicinity of the alignment.

Page 2 of 5 ends

Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 317
EXHIBIT C-1

2.1 Assumptions:
• 4 days are provided as an allowance for dipping existing septic tanks and this task will be completed in consecutive working days.
• The City or County will contact property owners and send notifications in advance, coordinating access to the private properties, as necessary for LCC to perform the survey. • The City or County will have a representative on site and accompany LCC while on private property .
• Only readily accessible septic tanks will be surveyed .

Task 2.2 - BOD Workshops: Consultant will hold up to two, two-hour workshops to work through assumptions and present findings to the City. These workshops will be held as a hybrid meeting so necessary team members may attend. One of the workshops will be used to review the draft BODR.

Task 2.3 - Simulate Updated Flows and Loading: Consultant shall evaluate the anticipated impacts to the City's existing Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) treatment capacity. Hydraulic, biological, and solids loading will be estimated for the extended sewer collection system and compared to the existing capacities at the WRP. Potentia l mitigation measures and/or capacity improvements will be identified with estimated implementation costs. Information for this task will be taken from the HydroScience Report.

Task 2.4 - Cost Evaluations: Consultant shall estimate construction costs and the cost to operate and maintain the added infrastructure. Consultant shall prepare a spreadsheet model to estimate revenue from connection fees and monthly service charges for the various land uses likely to connect to the new sewer. Consultant shall prepare short, mid and long-range revenue forecasts and identify potential operating deficits. Operating costs evaluated will be evaluated for the pumpstation . It is assumed that routine maintenance costs will be provided by the city based on their existing sewer maintenance program. The City will also provide connection fee and usage rate information for the evaluation.

Consultant shall analyze and compare a deep gravity line alternative with a lift station alternative for the reach on Tesla Road near Vasco Road. Analysis shall include lifecycle cost estimates for each alternative (permitting, right of way, construction, operation, maintenance, rehabilitation and capital replacement costs). Discuss pros and cons of alternatives addressing issues such as new connections and ease of maintenance .

Task 2.5 - BOOR: The BODR will summarize all findings under this task and provide recommendations on the following:
• Confirm extended sewer routing and alignment
• Discharges to the extended sewer collection system compared to ongoing use of septic systems and land application
• Sewer conveyance solely via gravity pipelines compared to use of a lift station • Design criteria including pipe material, size, slope, connection type, and capacity • Proposed lift station location and capacity of equipment

Page 3 of 5 ends

Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 318
EXHIBIT C-1
Information and/or Services Provided by City for Task 2.0:
• Provide the anticipated flows based on connection type. (Information will be from the HydroScience Report and confirmed by the City)
• Provide wastewater flows and loads information from the wineries if different than the HydroScience Report.
• Provide access to properties for survey of septic systems and clean outs . • Input at meetings .
• Responses to information requests .

Consultant Deliverables for Task 2.0:
• Meeting agenda, presentation materials, and meeting minutes . • Topographic survey of the proposed alignment and spot elevations for septic tanks. • Two geotechnical bore hole bore logs for the canal crossing. • Evaluate data provided by the City and present the findings. • Hold up to two, two-hour workshops to work through assumptions and present findings to the City.
• Draft and Final BODR
o Define design criteria .
o List regulatory, permitting, and right of way requirements.

Assumptions
• Carollo will assist the City in making decisions but the information will generally need to be provided by the City. No testing or public information gathering has been included at this time. • The project does not need a rate study and sewer rates will follow the current City rate schedule . • No permit fees have been included in our budget and will be paid by the City or County. • The City and County will assist in providing access to the Canal for survey of inverts. • Schedule is subject to change based on availability at time of NTP Task 3.0 - As-Directed Services
Upon request by the City, Carollo shall provide as-directed services to the City. A budget allowance of $59,906 has been included . Any use of this budget allowance shall require written authorization from the City that includes the scope of as-directed services and an agreed upon not-to-exceed limit. As directed services could include the following:
• Payment of Fees, including permit fees
• Additional geotechnical and surveying services
• Attendance of meetings beyond those described above
• Public outreach
• Design related services

Page 4 of 5 ends

Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 319
EXHIBIT C-1
Preliminary Schedule
Survey Four weeks from NTP
Geotechnical Boring Six weeks from NTP
Preliminary Findings Workshop Twelve weeks from NTP

Page 5 of 5 ends

Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 320
TASK

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025 SP
QA/QC
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule $378
Column --,-
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 0

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings) 0
Task 1 Total Hours 0
Task 1 Total Budget $0
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech , Utility Research) 0

2.2 BOD Workshops 0

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScien ce Report) 0

2.4 Cost Evaluations 0

2.5 BOOR 5
Task 2 Total Hours 5
Task 2 Total Budget $1,890
TASK 3 - As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services 5
Task 3 Total Hours 5
Task 3 Total Budget $1,890
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours 10
Tasks 1-3 Total Budaet $3,780
LPP
Principal-
in-Charge
$299
2 3
10 13
$3,887
0 10
20 0
0 30
$8,970
40 40
$11,960
83 I $24,817
EXHIBIT C-1

SP LPP SP LPP
Project Project Senior Structural
Manager Engineer Professional Engineer
$378 $350 $378 $350
3 4 6 7
90 0 0 0
20 20 4 2
110 20 4 2
$41 ,580 $7,000 $1 ,512 $700
4 8 0 0
20 40 10 0
0 0 150 0
20 60 5 0
40 80 20 0
84 188 185 0
$31,752 $65,800 $69,930 $0
40 40 40 5
40 40 40 5
$15,120 $14,000 $15,120 $1,750
234 248 229 7
I $88,452 I $86,800 I $86,562 I $2,450
1 of4
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 321
TASK

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025 SP
EPIC
Engineer
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule $378
Column ti
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 0

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings) 0
Task 1 Total Hours 0
Task 1 Total Budget $0
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech , Utility Research ) 0

2.2 BOD Workshops 10

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScience Report) 0

2.4 Cost Evaluations 0

2.5 BODR 30
Task 2 Total Hours 40
Task 2 Total Budget $15,120
TASK 3 - As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services
Task 3 Total Hours 0
Task 3 Total Budget $0
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours 40
Tasks 1-3 Total Budaet $15,120
pp
EPIC
Engineer
$324
~
0 0
0 $0
0 0
0 0
20 20
$6,480
0 $0
20 I $6,480 I
EXHIBIT C-1

LP AP ST
Project Civil Staff CAD
Services Engineer Engineer Technician
$205 $299 $232 $239
11 lZ lJ 14
12 0 0 0
0 10 0 0
12 10 0 0
$2,460 $2,990 $0 $0
0 24 0 30
0 50 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 50 0 0
0 200 36 100
0 324 36 130
$0 $96,876 $8,352 $31 ,070
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
$0 $0 $0 $0
12 334 36 130
$2,460 I $99,866 I $8,352 I $31,070
2 of 4
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 322
TASK

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWE R EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025 DP/C
Document
Processing
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule $166
Column 15
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 0

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings) 0
Task 1 Total Hours 0
Task 1 Total Budget $0
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech, Utility Research) 0

2.2 BOD Workshops 0

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScience Report) 2

2.4 Cost Evaluations 0

2.5 BOOR 10
Task 2 Total Hours 12
Task 2 Total Budget $1,992
TASK 3 - As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services 0
Task 3 Total Hours 0
Task 3 Total Budget $0
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours 12
Tasks 1-3 Total Budget $1,992
EXHIBIT C-1

SUBCONSULTANTS OTHER DIRE
Sub-
consultant
Geotech Survey Subtotals Markup
16 17 18 19 22 23
105 $37,377 $0 $0 $0 $0
66 $22,752 $0 $0 $0 $0
171
$60,1 29 $0 $0 $0 $0
66 $18,658 $27,099 $125,361 $152,460 $15,246
140 $47,060 $0 $0 $0 $0
172 $63,012 $0 $0 $0 $0
135 $45,400 $0 $0 $0 $0
541 $164,102 $0 $0 $0 $0
1054
$338,232 $27,099 $125,361 $152,460 $15,246
170 $59,840 $0 $0 $0 $0
170
$59,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 I
1395
I $458,201 $27,099 $125,361 $152,460 $15,246
3 of4
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 323
TASK
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings)
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule
Column
Task 1 Total Hours
Task 1 Total Budget

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech , Utility Research)

2.2 BOD Workshops

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScience Report)

2.4 Cost Evaluations

2.5 BOOR
Task 2 Total Hours
Task 2 Total Budget
TASK 3 - As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services
Task 3 Total Hours
Task 3 Total Budget
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours
Tasks 1-3 Total Budaet
EXHIBIT C-1

CT COSTS COST SUMMARY
Travel
$/mi
Total ODCs Total Cost
z:, Zb zr
$0 $0 $37,377
$1,744 $1 ,744 $24,496
$1 ,744 $1,744 $61,873
$412 $168,118 $186,776
$412 $412 $47,472
$0 $0 $63,012
$0 $0 $45,400
$0 $0 $164,102
$1 ,282 $168,988 $507,220
$66 $66 $59 ,906
$66 $66 $59,906
$3,092 $170,799 $629,000
4 of 4
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 324
Exhibit C-2
Project Management Scope and Budget
• Coordinate all activities with County of Alameda staff as needed • Prepare agreement with consultant to prepare BOD Report • Seek City Council approval of consultant agreement
• Coordinate with consultant as needed
• Review consultant's deliverables
• Review and approve consultant's invoice for payment
• Coordinate with City of Livermore Finance Division to receive funding from County and to pay consultant's invoices
• Coordinate with various City of Livermore staff as needed • Prepare quarterly progress updates
• Prepare final invoice and project accounting
• Prepare and issue RFP for design
• Review proposals and rank design consultants
Project Management Budget - $71,000
Item 6.4
REVISED: Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement 325
1 Ashley Zieba
From: Staci Kane
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 10:27 AM
To: City Clerk
Subject: Subdivision SUB20-004 and Planned Development PD25-001 Categories: Ashley, Debbie, Public Comment
Exercise Caution: This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Dear Livermore City Council,
I’m writing to express my sincere concern over the grave safety issues that will result by placing the proposed development in this location with another entrance between the north Carrigan Common entrance and the intersection of East Ave and Dolores. The traffic that will result from vehicles going in and out of this development will add to an already busy, congested area with an adjacent bus stop, pedestrian walkway, a major thoroughfare with the police department traffic, 2-way bus traffic, and multiple apartment building traffic—and this will be compounded with traffic from the large planned housing development in the old Nob Hill plaza with an entrance on Dolores.

An initial review of this development determined that another entrance on Dolores between East Ave and Carrigan Common was not feasible due to public safety concerns. Now there will be increased traffic from the new Pacific Ave and Dolores development (with entrance on Dolores) and the large development for senior housing on the other end of Pacific that connects with Dolores. Our small area cannot safely sustain all this development with the current plan. There will be multiple accidents waiting to happen and special risk to student pedestrians heading to and from Livermore High and East Ave Middle School and pedestrians coming and going to multiple bus stops. This area has already been a major focus for car, bike, and pedestrian safety due to congestion on East Ave and side streets like Dolores. Now the road and crosswalk usage will increase substantially.

I’m not sure what changed to suddenly make another entrance in this very short section between East Ave and Carrigan Common deemed safe. I heard that a donation from the developer was recently received. As Council Members I’m sure you do not want people to think that movement toward this development is linked in any way.

Another concern is the lack of communication with the affected community as no notice was given to neighbors in close proximity about the planning meeting or the meeting today. I did not receive a notice for either meeting as is the case for all but one of my neighbors. This gives the appearance of this development being rushed through the process without adequate review.

Unfortunately I am out of the state on travel or I would have been at the meeting and had I known earlier I would have changed my travel plans to attend tonight. I know other neighbors who had to quickly change plans to attend. I’m wondering if you as Council Members would like to be exposed to these dangerous conditions. There will be multiple costly accidents waiting to happen if you approve the current plan with access between East Ave and Carrigan Common. Please consider if you think this is safe and you would want your family members walking down the sidewalk here. Or driving through this currently busy traffic area that will soon be even busier. Please at least take time to consider the risks carefully. I hope there will be more time so all those impacted can contribute to the discussion as the majority are still unaware.

Item 7.1 (Continued)
Public Comment
326
2 Respectfully,
Staci Kane
Item 7.1 (Continued)
Public Comment
327
Item 8.1
PowerPoint Presentation
328
2 City Manager’s Contract Amendment
Staff recommends City Council:

1. Adopt resolution approving amendment to the
City Manager contract effective November 17,
2025

2. For item 6.6 - adopt a resolution amending the
City’s Salary Plan to reflect salary increases for
the City Manager and the executive team
(excluding the Police Chief) effective November
17, 2025, and minimum wage increases effective
December 29, 2025
Questions?
3 4
Item 8.1
PowerPoint Presentation
329
Council Member Date of
Meeting or
Event
Committee or Organization -
(Please spell out acronyms)
Meeting or Event Type (ex.
board meeting or ribbon
cutting)
Summary of Meeting or Event
Mayor Marchand 10/14/2025 City of Livermore Ribbon-cutting Welcomed Kings Classical Academy School to their new campus.

Mayor Marchand 10/15/2025 Pleasanton Chamber of
Commerce
Tri-Valley Mayors Summit The Tri-Valley mayors talked about issues of local and regional interest.

Mayor Marchand 10/15/2025
City of Livermore - DayBreak
Labs
Reception and symposium Heard a presentation on the state of the life sciences and related technology in the Tri-Valley.

Mayor Marchand 10/16/2025 City of Livermore TV30 Mayor's Report Provided an update on City activities.

Mayor Marchand 10/16/2025 Livermore Valley Wine
Community
Taste Our Terroir culinary
event
Wine and food pairing highlighting the Livermore Valley's finest.

Mayor Marchand 10/17/2025 City of Livermore Celebration of Life Celebration of Life for City Historian Alan Frank.

Mayor Marchand 10/18/2025 Livermore Rotary First Annual Downtown BBQ Attended and spoke at the event.

Mayor Marchand 10/18/2025 City of Livermore Ribbon-cutting Welcomed the Livermore Fine Arts Studios Mayor Marchand 10/20/2025 City of Livermore Meeting Met with Chinese Consul General Zhang Jianmin Mayor Marchand 10/21/2025 Chamber of Commerce Leadership Livermore kick- off
Welcomed the participants
Mayor Marchand 10/21/2025 St. Michael School Water Science demonstrations
Participated in a water science program.

Mayor Marchand 10/22/2025 Chamber of Commerce Board meeting Provided update on City activities, approved financials.

Mayor Marchand 10/22/2025 City of Livermore DayBreak
Labs
Board meeting
Hear a review of past events and activities. Approved
financials
Mayor Marchand 10/23/2025 United States Conference of
Mayors Water Council
Fall meeting and program Presented a talk on asset management and chaired the two-day program.

Mayor Marchand 10/24/2025 U.S. Conference of Mayors
Water Council
Meeting and technical
program
Chaired and moderated the two-day program.

Item 9.0
Council Reports
330
Mayor Marchand 10/25/2025 Misty Circle Hindu
Community
Diwali Celebration Dance and music program celebrating Diwali. Spoke at the event.

Mayor Marchand 10/27/2025 San Joaquin Regional Rail
Commission
Retirement Farewell to Stacey Mortensen after more than 30 years of service.

Item 9.0
Council Reports
331
Council Member Date of
Meeting or
Event
Committee or Organization - (Please spell
out acronyms)
Meeting or Event Type (ex. board meeting or ribbon cutting) Vice Mayor Branning 10/15/2025 Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce Tri-Valley Mayor’s Summit Vice Mayor Branning 10/15/2025 Livermore Chamber of Commerce Monthly Business Mixer Vice Mayor Branning 10/21/2025 Livermore Downtown Inc Board meeting Vice Mayor Branning 10/23/2025 Livermore Chamber of Commerce Wine country luncheon on agritourism Vice Mayor Branning 10/25/2025 Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority Roadeo Vice Mayor Branning 10/27/2025 Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority Projects and services committee meeting Item 9.0
Council Reports
332
Council Member Date of Meeting
or Event
Committee or
Organization - (Please
spell out acronyms)
Meeting or Event
Type (ex. board
meeting or ribbon
cutting)
Summary of Meeting or Event
Council Member Barrientos 10/14/2025 City Environmental Climate Rd Table
Met with several nonprofit groups and
discussed ways we can improve our efforts
and education on climate matters
Council Member Barrientos 10/15/2025 City Tri Valley Mayors Summit
Summary of the City’s development and
projects
Council Member Barrientos 10/15/2025 City Tri Valley Life Science Summit
Discussion of what companies in the area
are developing and discovering in the
sciences
Council Member Barrientos 10/16/2025 City Minus Tobacco Group
Discussion on how to get the message of
anti tobacco to the youth
Council Member Barrientos 10/17/2025 City Ava Sub committee on marketing
Discussion on how to get the Ava message
out to the public
Council Member Barrientos 10/18/2025 Personal Attended the No Kings rallies in
Livermore and
Pleasanton
Joined hundreds in the protest
Council Member Barrientos 10/18/2025 City Ava board meeting Extended cap and investment for 20 years update on state legislation
Item 9.0
Council Reports
333
Council Member Date of Meeting
or Event
Committee or Organization -
(Please spell out acronyms)
Meeting or Event Type (ex.
board meeting or ribbon
cutting)
Summary of Meeting or Event
Council Member Wang 10/14/2025 Tri-Valley Nonprofit Alliance Environment & Climate Roundtable
Gathering of various groups working on
environment and climate issues to share ongoing
work in areas of mutual interest
Council Member Wang 10/15/2025 Pleasanton Chamber of
Commerce
Tri-Valley Mayors' Summit Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan moderated a panel of the five Tri-Valley mayors
to discuss what’s going on in their cities
Council Member Wang 10/15/2025 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce
Monthly mixer Hosted by Legacy Real Estate
Council Member Wang 10/18/2025 Livermore Pride Annual Pridefest Food, vendors, and performances at Bankhead Plaza
Council Member Wang 10/18/2025 Rotary Club of the Livermore Valley
Community BBQ Food, vendors, community organizations, and children’s activities
Council Member Wang 10/22/2025 Livermore Police Dept., City of Livermore
Trunk or Treat Very well attended event with activities and candy for kids; food provided by Livermore
Pleasanton Fire Dept.

Council Member Wang 10/23/2025 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce
Wine Country Luncheon Panel discussion of agro-tourism
Council Member Wang 10/23/2025 Tri-Valley Haven Evening of Appreciation TVH Board of Directors event to thank supporters Council Member Wang 10/24/2025 Granada High School and
Livermore High School Green
Team
Youth Climate Rally Local participation in national rally to support Make Polluters Pay bill
Council Member Wang 10/25/2025 Livermore Amador Valley
Transit Authority (LAVTA)
"Roadeo" Bus driver and Board of Directors bus driving
competition
Council Member Wang 10/27/2025 State Senator Aisha Wahab Press conference State audit of Alameda County foster care system Item 9.0
Council Reports
334

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 11.2

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Marianna A. Burch, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Supplemental materials received at the meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

DECISION TYPE
Not Applicable

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

1. Items Received at the Meeting

Prepared by: Ashley Zieba
Assistant City Clerk

335
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
336
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
337
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
338
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
339
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
340
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
341
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
342
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
343
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
344
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
345
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
346
Item 3.1
REVISED PowerPoint Presentation
347
Item 5.0
Public Comment
348
Item 5.0
Public Comment
349
Item 5.0
Public Comment
350
Item Name Comment

6.4) Resolutions authorizing execution of a
cooperation agreement with Alameda County to
reimburse the City with County funding in an amount
not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and
engineering services for the South Livermore Valley
Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and authorizing,
subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation
agreement, a supplemental appropriation of
$700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP
Wastewater Fund 621 in the FY 2025-26 budget and
execution of an agreement with Carollo Engineers,
Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a
term ending December 31, 2026, to provide
engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design
report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension
Project WW202313.

Lori Souza
I'm Lori Souza a former Tri-Valley Conservancy Board Chair. I want to thank the city and county staff who have been working cooperatively on this critical project. The resolutions before you tonight are needed to construct an extension of sanitary sewer lines to serve both commercial and residential users in the South Livermore Valley Agricultural Preserve. This critical infrastructure development is necessary to address groundwater quality issues and to support a flourishing agricultural tourism economy. A significant majority of Livermore voters supported this initiative in November 2022.

The Livermore Wine Country, a vital part of our local economy and quality of life, is experiencing a concerning decline.

Without the extension of these essential sewer services, the growth potential of the wine industry and agritourism sectors will face further setbacks.

I respectfully urge you to accept the staff recommendations to approve these two resolutions before you this evening. eComment
351
1 Ashley Zieba
From: Rebecca Spector <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 4:01 PM
To: City Clerk
Subject: ecomment system not working
Exercise Caution: This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Hello I am trying to submit comments via the comment online portal but the system veriﬁcation system is not working. Here are my comments for tonight:

SUPPORT – ITEM 6.4

6.4) Resolutions authorizing execution of a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and authorizing, subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund 621 in the FY 2025-26 budget and execution of an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026, to provide engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

Tri-Valley Conservancy strongly support the initiation of the sewer project. This project will enable wineries and other businesses to connect to the much needed sewer. This is critical to maintaining the economic viability of the South Livermore Valley wine country. We appreciate the city continuing to move forward on this important project.

Rebecca Spector, Executive Director
Tri-Valley Conservancy
Rebecca Spector
Executive Director
925-449-8706 x1
[email protected]
P.O
. Box 987
Livermore, CA 94551
https://TriValleyConservancy.org
Item 6.4
Public Comment
352
Council Member Date of Meeting
or Event
Committee or
Organization - (Please
spell out acronyms)
Meeting or Event Type
(ex. board meeting or
ribbon cutting)
Summary of Meeting or Event
Council Member Dunbar 10/18/2025 Livermore Pride 2025 Pridefest Council Member Dunbar 10/18/2025 Livermore Rotary BBQ at Carnegie Park Council Member Dunbar 10/20/2025 Tri Valley Water Liaison Committee
Committee meeting Chaired the committee with presentations from CalWater and Zone7. Calwater presented about their
role in firefighting as one element of multiple
elements, and their investment strategy to improve
availability during events. Zone7 presented on their
Pleasanton area well projects, including cost benefit
analysis, PFAS mitigation analysis, and alternatives
selection.

Council Member Dunbar 10/20/2025 City of Livermore City Attorney's Office
New City Attorney
Welcome
Council Member Dunbar 10/22/2025 City of Livermore Trunk or Treat Roamed Trunk or Treat as Jafar, gave away candy Council Member Dunbar 10/23/2025 Alameda County
Transportation
Commission
Commission Meeting Approved funding applications for multiple items.

Items of note for Livermore included Arroyo Road
Trail and Olivina Avenue bike facility projects.

Additionally, a countywide freeway onramp/offramp
safety study was approved - I recommended staff use
the CalTrans District 4 Bike/Ped Plans as starting
points to reduce the work required.

Council Member Dunbar 10/25/2025 Livermore Amador
Valley Transit Authoriy
2025 Bus Roadeo Served as a judge for the main event, counting number of obstacle tennis balls ran over.

Item 9.0
Council Reports
353

Livermore City CouncilOctober 27, 2025

Livermore City Council
October 27, 2025