Agenda packet — Livermore City Council, October 27, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

CITY COUNCIL

REVISED AGENDA
MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2025
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
*Item 7.1 has been continued to November 24, 2025

MEETING PARTICIPATION INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND AT THE END OF THE AGENDA

CIVIC CENTER MEETING HALL

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1016 S. LIVERMORE AVENUE
CITY OF LIVERMORE YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofLivermoreCalifornia
TV29:

Comcast TV Channel 29
tv29live.org
John P Marchand, Mayor
Evan Branning, Vice Mayor
Ben Barrientos, Council Member
Steven Dunbar, Council Member
Kristie Wang, Council Member
Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
1 1. CLOSED SESSION - NONE

2. CALL TO ORDER

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3.1 Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District update presented by Ryan Clausnitzer, General Manager and Dr. Maya Manoharan, Livermore Trustee
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council receive the update.

Staff Report

3.2 Proclamation declaring October 2025 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month, presented to Christine Dillman, Tri-Valley Haven Director
Recommendation:

Staff recommends City Council declare October 2025 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Proclamation

3.3 Airport Commission Annual Update to City Council presented by Chair Darin Bishop and Benedict Stuth, Airport Manager
Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council receive the update.

Staff Report

4. ADVISORY BODY APPOINTMENTS - NONE

5. OPEN FORUM
In conformance with the Brown Act, no City Council action can occur on items presented during Open Forum.

To provide public comment in person, please submit a speaker card. When your name

ROLL CALL
Council Member Ben Barrientos
Council Member Steven Dunbar
Council Member Kristie Wang
Vice Mayor Evan Branning
Mayor John Marchand

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
2 is called, walk to the lectern to address City Council.

Comments are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person, per item. The Mayor may reduce the amount of time based on the number of persons wishing to speak.

Open Forum will conclude after 30 minutes; however, if there are additional speakers, Open Forum will reconvene before the meeting adjourns.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and are acted upon by the City Council with a single action. Members of the audience wishing to provide public input must submit a speaker card found at the entrance of the Council Chambers. A speaker is limited to a single comment with a maximum of three minutes for the entire Consent Calendar. If Consent Calendar items are pulled for discussion by the City Council, a speaker will be allowed one comment per item on the items pulled for discussion and a separate comment for the remaining Consent Calendar.

6.1 Approval of draft minutes - October 13, 2025 Regular Meeting Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the draft minutes.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. DRAFT 2025-10-13

6.2 Resolution awarding a construction contract with BuildCorp, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $617,951, for Street Lighting Project TC201923.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the following actions for Street Lighting Project TC201923:

1. Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with BuildCorp, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $617,951, pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code Section 2.68.570 (C);

2. Reject all other bid proposals; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Construction Contract

6.3 Resolution authorizing execution of an agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Commission administered 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan that provides $825,000 in funding for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133
Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
3 Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) administered 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) that provides $825,000 in funding for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133;

2. Replacing $825,000 of the Measure BB-Local Streets and Roads funding in Fiscal Year 2025-26 with the ACTC CIP funding; and

3. Authorizing the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Agreement

6.4 Resolutions authorizing execution of a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and authorizing, subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund 621 in the FY 2025-26 budget and execution of an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026, to provide engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt two resolutions:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and

2. Authorizing, subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund (Fund 621) in the FY 2025-26 budget.

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026, to provide engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement

4. Resolution

5. Exhibit A - Carollo Professional Services Agreement
Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
4 6.5 Resolution accepting the FY 2024-25 Year-End Budget Report, allocating the General Fund Surplus for various purposes, allocating surplus member contributions to Livermore- Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD), appropriating additional budget to those funds that ended FY 2024-25 with expenditures in excess of budget, and appropriating additional budget in FY 2025-26
Recommendation:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution accepting the FY 2024-25 Year End Budget Report, allocating excess General Fund monies for various purposes, allocating surplus member contributions to the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) Workers Compensation Fund, appropriating additional budget to those funds that ended FY 2024-25 with expenditures in excess of budget, and approving supplemental appropriations in four funds for FY 2025-26 expenses.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - FY 2024-25 Year-End Budget Report

6.6 Resolution approving the City of Livermore Salary Plan to reflect salary increases to Executive Management (excluding Police Chief) and the City Manager effective November 17, 2025, and minimum wage increases effective December 29, 2025.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the City of Livermore Salary Plan to reflect salary increases to Executive Management (excluding Police Chief) and the City Manager effective November 17, 2025, and minimum wage increases effective December 29, 2025.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Salary Plan Dated November December

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS

7.1 THIS PREVIOUSLY NOTICED ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 24, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Hearing to consider a request to approve a Planned Development (PD) 25-001, Subdivision (SUB) 20-004, and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 to allow a two-story, attached, 13-unit multi-family, townhome-style development located at 3541 East Avenue.

Recommendation:

Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution finding the project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15332, In-Fill Projects, and Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with the

Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
5 provisions of CEQA, subject to project approval;

2. Adopt a resolution approving Subdivision (SUB) 20-004 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 for the development located at 3541 East Avenue; and

3. Introduce an ordinance and waive the first reading authorizing Planned Development (PD) 25-001.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Planning Commission Staff Report

2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes

3. Location Map

4. Development Plans

5. Colors and Materials Board

6. Traffic Assessment

7. Public Comments

8. Resolution - CEQA

9. Exhibit A - Planning Commission CEQA Resolution

10. Resolution - Project

11. Exhibit A - Planning Commission Project Resolution

12. Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval

13. Ordinance

14. Exhibit A - Planning Commission PD Resolution

15. Exhibit B - Planned Development (PD) 25-001

8. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION

8.1 Resolution approving an amendment to the City Manager's employment contract.

Recommendation:

The Evaluation Subcommittee recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving an amendment to the City Manager's employment contract.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - City Manager Contract

9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY

MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

10. ADJOURNMENT
To a Regular City Council meeting on Monday, November 10, 2025 at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chamber, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

11. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

11.1 Supplemental materials received prior to the meeting.

Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
6 Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Supplemental Materials

11.2 Supplemental materials received at the meeting.

Staff Report
Attachments:

1. Items Received at the Meeting

12. HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN YOUR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
You can participate in the meeting in a number of ways:

Open Forum is an opportunity for the public to speak regarding items not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person. To address the City Council in person, you must submit a speaker card to the City Clerk prior to the start of that item. Please note that the City Council is prohibited by State law from taking action on any items that are not listed on the agenda. However, if your item requires action, the City Council may place it on a future agenda or direct staff to work with you and/or report to the City Council on the issue.

Public Hearings - The topic of the hearing is typically summarized by staff, followed by a presentation by the applicant, and questions from the City Council. The Mayor will then open the hearing to the public and offer an opportunity for public comments. Speakers are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person. To address the City Council in person, you must submit a speaker card to the City Clerk prior to the start of the presentation of the item.

Other Agenda Items are also open for public input including Advisory Body Appointments, Consent Calendar, or Matters for Consideration items. These comments are also subject to the 3-minute limit. Public comment is not accepted on Proclamations and Presentations.

Special Meetings, Workshops - The public will have the opportunity to address the City Council regarding the item that is the subject of the special meeting or workshop. Public comments are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person.

Platforms to Participate in Meetings:

Submission of Comments Prior to the Meeting:

Email Comments may be submitted by the public to the City Clerk’s Office ([email protected]). Items received no later than 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council and available on the City website prior to the meeting. These items will NOT be read into the record.
eComments may be submitted by the public using the eComment link here. Comments may be up to 1000 characters in length and will be accepted up until 4:00 pm the day of the meeting. These items will NOT be read into the record and are viewable by the City Council and the public upon submittal.

Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
7 Submission of Comments During the Meeting:

Speakers are limited to a maximum of 3 minutes per person. To submit a comment you must complete a speaker card for each item. Speaker cards are available in the Civic Center Meeting Hall lobby. Indicate on the card the item number you wish to comment on and submit the card directly to the City Clerk prior to the start of the item. Please note that the City Council is prohibited by State law from taking action on any items that are not listed on the agenda.

However, if your item requires action, the City Council may place it on a future agenda or direct staff to work with you and/or report to the City Council on the issue.

The City will be using YouTube and TV29 as two tools to provide the public access to view City Council meetings. No public comment will be accepted via YouTube.

TV29: tv29live.org Comcast Cable 29
YouTube: http://youtube.com/c/CityofLivermoreCalifornia If you would like to deliver written materials to the City Council as part of your public comment, please provide 10 copies to the City Clerk with your speaker card.

The City Council Agenda and Agenda Reports are prepared by City staff and are available for public review on Tuesday evening, six days prior to the City Council meeting in the Civic Center Library, 1188 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore, and at the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore. The Agenda is also available on the City’s website, http://LivermoreCA.gov/agenda.

Under Government Code §54957.5, any supplemental material distributed to the members of the City Council after the posting of this agenda will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore, and included in the agenda packet available on the City’s web site at http://LivermoreCA.gov/agenda.

PURSUANT TO TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (CODIFIED AT 42 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 12101 AND 28 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 35), AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, THE CITY OF

LIVERMORE DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, SEX, DISABILITY, AGE OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION IN THE PROVISION OF ANY SERVICES, PROGRAMS, OR ACTIVITIES. TO ARRANGE AN

ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PUBLIC MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE ADA COORDINATOR AT [email protected] OR CALL (925) 960-4170 (VOICE) OR (925) 960- 4104 (TDD) AT LEAST THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.

Livermore City Council Agenda October 27, 2025
8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 3.1

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Marianna A. Burch, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District update presented by Ryan Clausnitzer, General Manager and Dr. Maya Manoharan, Livermore Trustee

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council receive the update.

DECISION TYPE
Not Applicable

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

Prepared by: Debbie Elam
City Clerk

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Marianna A. Burch, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Proclamation declaring October 2025 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month, presented to Christine Dillman, Tri-Valley Haven Director

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends City Council declare October 2025 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month.

DECISION TYPE
Not Applicable

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proclamation

Prepared by: Deborah
Davis
Executive Assistant

Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
10 11

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 3.3

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Brandon Cardwell, Innovation and Economic Development Director SUBJECT:

Airport Commission

Annual Update to City Council presented by Chair Darin Bishop and Benedict Stuth, Airport Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council receive the update.

DECISION TYPE
Not Applicable

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

Prepared by: Benedict Stuth
Airport Manager

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Marianna A. Burch, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Approval of draft minutes - October 13, 2025 Regular Meeting

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council approve the draft minutes.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

1. DRAFT 2025-10-13

Prepared by: Debbie Elam
City Clerk

DRAFT MINUTES
CI

TY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 13, 2025
________________________________________________________________ C

LOSED SESSION
CAL
L TO ORDER – The Closed Session of the City Council was called to order by Mayor John Marchand at 6:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

RO
LL CALL – Present: Mayor John Marchand, Vice Mayor Evan Branning, Council Members Ben Barrientos, Steven Dunbar, and Kristie Wang.

PPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ITEMS.

Ma
yor Marchand opened the public comment period.

T
here were no speakers, the public comment period was closed.

1. ADJ

OURN TO CLOSED SESSION

1.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation. Annual evaluation of City Manager, pursuant to Government Code section 54957.
1 .2 Conference with Labor Negotiators. To meet with Mayor Marchand and Vice-Mayor Branning, the City’s negotiators, pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6 regarding negotiations for salary and compensation for Unrepresented Employee – City Manager.
________________________________________________________________ RE

GULAR MEETING

2. CALL TO ORDER – The m eeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor John Marchand at 7:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

RO
LL CALL – Present: Mayor John Marchand, Vice Mayor Evan Branning, Council Members Ben Barrientos, Steven Dunbar, and Kristie Wang.

LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
RE

PORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
M
ayor Marchand stated there was no reportable action.

ATTACHMENT 1
14 CM/76/2 Minutes OCTOBER 13, 2025

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS – NONE

4. ADVISORY BODY APPOINTMENTS

4.1 Confirm Advisory Body appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission and the Human Services Commission and direct the City Clerk to administer the oath of office.

Historic Preservation Commission 2 Vacancies
Appointment to an unexpired term ending May 1, 2028
• Daniel Curtis

Appointment to an unexpired term ending May 1, 2029
• Devon Caufield

Human Services Commission, 3 Vacancies
Appointment to an unexpired term ending November 1, 2028 • Yang (Anna) You

Reappointment to regular term ending November 1, 2029

• Tracy Nakamura

Appointment to regular term ending November 1, 2029

• Steven Cox

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER BARRIENTOS, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR AND CARRIED ON A 5 -0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL CONFIRMED THE APPOINTMENTS.

City Clerk Debbie Elam administered the oath of office.

5. OPEN FORUM

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

Joe Lee provided a comment.

There were no more speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

Mayor Marchand opened the public comment period.

ATTACHMENT 1
15 OCTOBER 13, 2025 Minutes CM/76/3

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF VICE MAYOR BRANNING , SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR AND CARRIED ON A 5 -0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

6.1 Approval of draft minutes - September 8, 2025 Regular Meeting.

6.2 Adoption of O rdinance 2180 amending Title 3, Chapter 3.45 Social Opportunity Endowment Fund (SOE) sections 3.45.020 Purpose of the Fund and

3.45.040 Administration and Organization of Fund in the Livermore Municipal Code.

6.3 Resolution 2025-158 authorizing the acceptance for permanent maintenance, release of the security bonds, and execution of a Notice of Completion for the Resurfacing and Sidewalk Improvements Project, comprised of the Street Resurfacing Project SM202201, Sidewalk Repair Project SM202302, and ADA Access Ramps Project SM202107.

6.4 Resolution 2025-159 approving Final Tract Map 8388 Cherry Way, authorizing execution of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the Cherry Way Development, located at Cherry Way and Goldenrod Drive, and accepting on behalf of the public, all real property offered for dedication within Final Tract Map 8388 except for certain easements which the City Council reserves the right to accept at a future date.

6.5 Resolution 2025-160 authorizing the execution of a first amendment to the agreement with CSG Consultants, Inc. for on-call engineering map and plan review services for development projects and improvement plans, increasing the not -to- exceed amount from $400,000 to $800,000, adding language to allow the City to modify the contract, and extending the contract term through December 31, 2028.

6.6 Resolution 2025-161 authorizing the City Manager to approve and execute change orders or contract amendments for the Golf Course Damage Repair Project SD202132, (FEMA PA -09-CA-4308- PW-00602), in an amount not to exceed ten percent of the construction contract value of $2,680,785.

6.7 Resolution 2025-162 authorizing execution of an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not -to-exceed $1,783,054 and a term ending June 30, 2029, to provide design and construction support services for the Water Reclamation Plant Digester Heating Loop Replacement Project WW202315.

6.8 Resolution 2025-163 authorizing the execution of a maintenance and support agreement with Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. to provide software support and services for the public safety computer-aided dispatch/records management/report writing software and related systems in an amount not -to-exceed $395,003 through October 31, 2028.

ATTACHMENT 1
16 CM/76/4 Minutes OCTOBER 13, 2025

6.9 Resolution 2025-164 authorizing execution of an agreement with National Trench Safety, Inc. for traffic control services at the San Francisco Premium Outlets and other sites as needed throughout the city, in an amount not-to-exceed $1,700,000, from November 1, 2025, through October 31, 2030.

6.10 Resolution 2025-165 awarding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with TriValley Janitorial Service and Supply, Inc. to provide janitorial services at various City facilities in an amount not-to-exceed $3,300,000 for a five- year term ending December 31, 2030.

6.11 Resolution 2025-166 awarding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with Mission Critical Specialists, Inc. to replace the uninterruptible power supply at City Hall, Police Station, and Civic Center Library in an amount not-to-exceed $300,000 for a one-year term ending October 31, 2026.

6.12 Resolution 2025-167 authorizing the execution of an agreement with Noll and Tam Architects in an amount not -to-exceed $302,140 and a term ending December 31, 2030, to provide plans, specifications, and engineering services during construction for the Civic Center Library Teen Space Improvement Project BL202418.

6.13 Resolution 2025-168 authorizing California Statewide Communities Development Authority to form a Community Facilities District for the Isabel Crossing (Tract 8659) project in accordance with Development Agreement (DA22- 001).

6.14 Resolution 2025-169 approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Livermore and the Association of Livermore Employees.

6.15 Resolution 2025-170 approving the City of Livermore Salary Plan as of October 6, 2025, in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5.

6.16 Resolution 2025-171 accepting the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 2024 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG), appropriating $519,207, and entering into an agreement with FEMA to use the funds for three Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) to advance to the rank of Firefighter Paramedics

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS

7.1 Hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance amending and revising the Building Code, Property Maintenance Code, Fire Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, Residential Code, Swimming Pool and Spa Code, Wildland Urban Interface Code, and the Green Building Standards Codes in the City's Municipal Code, to adopt by reference and amend the 2025 California Building Standards Code and the codes set forth therein. No amendments are proposed to the California Residential Code or other codes currently governing ATTACHMENT 1
17 OCTOBER 13, 2025 Minutes CM/76/5

residential structures. All provisions related to residential construction remain substantially similar to current regulations, with only editorial revisions that do not affect regulatory requirements.

Recommendation: Staff recommended the City Council adopt an ordinance, with an effective date of January 1, 2026:

1. Revising and amending Chapter 15.02 (Building Code), 15.04 (Property Maintenance Code), 15.06 (Fire Code), 15.08 (Electrical Code), 15.10 (Mechanical Code), 15.12 (Plumbing Code), 15.14 (Residential Code),

15.26 (Green Building Standards Code), 15.92 (Swim ming Pool and Spa Code), and 15.94 (Wildland Urban Interface Code) in The Livermore Municipal Code.

2. Adopting new Chapters 15.02 (Building Code), 15.06 (Fire Code), 15.08 (Electrical Code), 15.10 (Mechanical Code), 15.14 (Residential Code),

15.26 (Green Building Standards Code), and 15.94 (Wildland Urban Interface Code) of the Livermore Municipal Code by adopting and amending the 2025 Editions of the California Building, Fire, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Residential, Wildland Urban Interface, and Green Building Standards Codes.

3. Adopting new Chapter 15.04 (Property Maintenance Code) and 15.92 (Swimming Pool and Spa Code), of the Livermore Municipal Code by adopting and amending the 2024 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code and the 2024 edition of the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code.

4. Find that all codes adopted herein related to residential structures are “substantially similar” to the one currently in place and the Residential Code will not be amended before June 2031 in compliance with AB 130 and AB 306.

Chief Building Official, Franc Moufarrej, presented the staff report.

Mayor Marchand opened the public hearing.

There were no speakers, and the hearing was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER WANG , SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BARRIENTOS AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE:

Ordinance 2181 revising and amending Building Code chapters 15.02 Building Code, 15.04 Property Maintenance Code, 15.06 Fire Code, 15.08 Electrical Code,

15.10 M echanical Code, 15.12 P lumbing Code,15.14 R esidential Code, 15.26 Green Building Standards Code, 15.92 Swimming Pool and Spa Code, and 15.94 Wildland Urban Interface Code in the Livermore Municipal Code, and Adopting by reference, and amending based upon local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions, the 2025 California Building Standards Code set forth in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and the following codes adopted therein - the 2024 ATTACHMENT 1
18 CM/76/6 Minutes OCTOBER 13, 2025

editions of the International Building Code, the International Fire Code, the International Property Maintenance Code, the International Residential Code, the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, the International Wildland Urban interface Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code, the Uniform Mechanical Code, the 2023 edition of the National Electrical Code, and the 2025 California Green Building Standards Code.

7.2 Hearing to receive and consider protests related to the annual fire hazard abatement program and confirm the 2025 Weed Abatement Program assessments for collection on the County Assessor tax roll.

Recommendation: Staff recommended City Council consider all protests, and if Council finds appropriate, adopt a resolution overruling protests and confirming the 2025 weed abatement assessments and direct staff to file a certified copy of the assessment report with the County Auditor.

Fire Marshal, Ryan Rucker presented the staff report.

Mayor Marchand opened the public hearing.

There were no speakers and the hearing was closed.

ON THE MOTION OF COUNCIL MEMBER DUNBAR, SECONDED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER WANG AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION:

Resolution 2025-172 overruling protests and confirming assessments – Fire Hazard Abatement

8. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION – NONE

9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY

MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PROVIDED A SUMMARY OF

RECENTLY ATTENDED EVENTS AND MEETINGS IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET. COUNCIL

MEMBERS WHO DID NOT PROVIDE A SUMMARY IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET ARE INCLUDED BELOW.

Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) Vice Mayor Branning noted his attendance at the board meeting on October 6, 2025 and a projects and services committee on September 22, 2025.

Central Contra Costa County Transit Author ity (CCCTA)/LAVTA Paratransit Ad Hoc Committee Vice Mayor Branning noted his attendance at the October 2, 2025 meeting.

ATTACHMENT 1
19 OCTOBER 13, 2025 Minutes CM/76/7

League of California Cities Vice Mayor Branning noted his attendance at the Board dinner on September 25, 2025 and the Annual Conference and Expo from October 8-10, 2025.

Tri Valley Cities Councils Vice Mayor Branning noted his attendance at the September 24, 2025 meeting and dinner.

City of Livermore Vice Mayor Branning noted his attendance at the Fire Safety Expo on October 11, 2025.

10. ADJOURNMENT – at 7:26 pm to a Regular City Council Meeting on Monday, October 27, 2025 at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chamber, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

APPROVED:

JOHN P. MARCHAND, MAYOR

ATTEST: ___
DEBORAH L. ELAM, CITY CLERK
ATTACHMENT 1
20 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 6.2

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:

Resolution awarding a construction contract with BuildCorp, Inc., in an amount not-to- exceed $617,951, for Street Lighting Project TC201923.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the following actions for Street Lighting Project TC201923:
1 .

Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with BuildCorp, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $617,951, pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code Section 2.68.570 (C); 2 .

Reject all other bid proposals; and
3 .

Authorize the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
The City of Livermore’s Street Lighting Project TC201923 involves maintaining and improving lighting levels throughout the City. The main objective is to further enhance pedestrian and traffic safety. This project will make several street lighting improvements by installing new streetlights, replacing lightbulbs on existing streetlight poles, trimming trees, restoring minor sidewalk pavement, and installing new bollard lights at Carnegie Park. It includes strategies for reducing energy used and saving maintenance costs by upgrading existing lighting equipment. Certain upgrades include renewable sources, such as solar powered streetlights.

On September 16, 2025, twelve (12) bids were received for this project. Staff recommends the City Council award a construction contract with BuildCorp, Inc., the lowest responsible and responsive bidder.

DISCUSSION
21 The objective of this Street Lighting Project is to improve the street lighting in Livermore by installing new streetlights and upgrading incandescent lights, such as High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights to Light Emitted Diode (LED) and upgrading old LED lights. The improvements are proposed along East Avenue between South Livermore Avenue and Vasco Road. There are also several other locations added to this project by resident requests. Attachment 1 shows the lighting improvement locations.

This project will include new solar powered streetlights, specifically the Fonroche T3-CK16B-4K-56W light assembly on top of 25-foot-tall pole with 6’ mast arm. City Council authorized sole sourcing Fonroche Lighting America solar lights for this project on June 9, 2025.

Solar powered lights were chosen since the existing utility infrastructure consisting of overhead power lines owned by PG&E and other utility companies pose a constraint for installing the typical light poles.

Furthermore, there are potential clearance limitations, high costs for constructing underground structures, disruptions to existing infrastructure, and delays due to materials and inspections by PG&E.

This infrastructure includes sidewalks and roads. In addition to being a source of renewable energy, other benefits of implementing solar lights are as follows:

• More cost effective than customary streetlight installations. • Shorter lead time than traditional lighting equipment. • Less disruption to roads and sidewalks during construction. • It saves time on coordination with other utility companies. • Allows for better distribution of streetlights.

The Street Lighting Project is part of the City of Livermore Street Lighting Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). As part of this program, the City receives requests for lighting improvements from residents and business owners in Livermore. As an element of this Street Lighting Project, the City entered into an agreement for design and lighting evaluation services with DKS Associates for identifying several factors that include lighting objectives, existing lighting gaps, and priority lighting levels.

The priority levels evaluation identified locations along East Avenue and several other streets in Livermore. A total of 36 new solar powered streetlights will be installed with this project. In addition to solar powered streetlights, 77 new Light Emitting Diode (LED) lights will be installed as a replacement to the old LED lights on existing pole/arms along East Avenue to further improve visibility.

A major component of street lighting upgrades is to enhance lighting at parks. This project includes lighting upgrades at Carnegie Park, located at 2155 Third Street. As part of this upgrade, 35 new bollard lights will be installed along the walking paths of the park. There are currently 11 bollard lights that will be upgraded and are inclusive of the 35 bollard lights.

Other improvements include trimming existing trees that block the lighting canopy at several existing streetlights. All combined, the project will make improvements to safety and make the improvement areas more pedestrian friendly. Overall, the lighting improvements will increase the sense of comfort and security for the public.

On September 16, 2025, bids for this project were received and opened with 12 contractors submitting bids. The lowest responsible, responsive bidder was BuildCorp, Inc. The following is a list of the bids received and the Engineer’s Estimate for the project:

22 CONTRACTOR

LOCATION

BID AMOUNT
BuildCorp, Inc.

Sa
n Francisco
$617,951
Nema Construction
Albany
$654,780
S&H Construction, Inc.

Fremont
$668,600
DC Electric Group, Inc.

Cotati
$727,459
Power Design Electric, Inc.

Kingsburg
$751,416
Tennyson Electric, LLC
Livermore
$761,100
Mike Brown Electric
Cotati
$879,503
Bockmon & Woody Electric Co. Inc.

Stockton
$901,550
St. Francis Electric, LLC.

San Leandro
$905,316
Colombia Electric, Inc.

San Leandro
$906,375
Bear Electrical Solutions, LLC.

Alviso
$921,777
NACC Construction, LLC
Vacaville
$997,000
Engineer's Estimate

$697,000

In accordance with Livermore Municipal Code Section 2.68.590 (B) Change orders to public works contracts, the City Manager may authorize change orders up to a cumulative amount not exceeding $200,000 or 10 percent of the overall contract price, whichever is greater.

BuildCorp, Inc. has performed similar work for the City of Millbrae, City of Richmond, and the City of Pittsburg School District in a satisfactory manner.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS

The budget for Street Lighting Project TC201923 in the FY 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan covers the cost of this construction contract and all other project costs including design, change orders, construction inspection, construction management, and administration. No additional appropriations are required. The project is funded with Gas Taxes (Fund 834) and State -SB1 (Fund 835). The funding sources for this project are summarized in the table below:

FUND NO.

FUND NAME
FY 24-25
FY25-26
834
Gas Taxes
$130,000

835
State - SB1

1,050,000
Total Funding

$130,000
$1,050,000

COMMUNITY PILLAR

1: A Safe Community That Thrives

GOAL CATEGORY

10: Work to maintain a safe and efficient local transportation network and address safety concerns.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Project Location
23 2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Construction Contract

Prepared by: Juan Tenorio
Assistant Engineer

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH
BUILDCORP, INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $617,951, FOR STREET LIGHTING PROJECT TC201923

The objective of this Street Lighting Project is to i mprove the street lighting in Livermore by installing new streetlights and upgrading incandescent and old LED lights.

Improvements are proposed along East Avenue between South Livermore Avenue and South Vasco Road. Several other locations are included by r esident requests. The project involves installing approximately 77 new LED lights on existing poles and 36 new solar powered lights.

For new streetlights, rather than using the City’s standard streetlight poles with wired streetlights, this project propo ses to deploy solar powered streetlights, specifically the Fonroche Lighting America brand of solar light assembly on top of 25 -foot-tall poles with a 6’ mast arm.

This project will also include lighting upgrades at Carnegie Park, located at 2155 Third Street. As part of this upgrade, 35 new bollard lights will be installed along the walking paths of the park. There are currently 11 bollard lights that will be upgraded inclusive of the 35 bollard lights.

Pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 2.68 .550 (C) , and as recommended by the City Engineer, the City Council approved sole sourcing solar powered streetlights on June 9, 2025. Solar lights are recommended primarily due to overhead constraints associated with installing traditional wired streetlights.

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that it hereby:

1. Awards and authorizes the City Manager to execute a construction contract with BuildCorp, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this refe rence, in the amount not-to-exceed $617,951;

2. Rejects all other bid proposals; and

3. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council M ember ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

26 2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Kimberly Cilley
Deborah L. Elam Kimberly Cilley
City Clerk City Attorney

Exhibit A – BuildCorp Construction Contract
27 CONTRACT
This public works contract ("Contract") is entered into by and between the City of Livermore , a California Municipal Corporation ("City") and BuildCorp, Inc., a California Corporation ("Contractor") for work on the Street Lighting Project, No. 2019-23 ("Project").

The Parties Agree as Follows:

1. Award of Contract.

In response to the Notice Inviting Bids, Contractor has submitted a Bid Proposal to perform work on the Project, and on ______ , 20_, as part of Resolution No. _______ _ City authorized award of this Contract to Contractor for the amount of Contractor's bid.

2. Contract Documents.

This Contract consists of all of the written representations and submissions made by Contractor as part of the Bid process and the following numbered and un-numbered component documents, as detailed on the table of contents of this Agreement:

3. a. Bidding requirements (consisting of the Notice Inviting Bids; Instructions to Bidders; Bid Proposal ; Bid Schedule , Subcontractor List, Noncollusion Declaration, Bid Bond, Bidder's Questionnaire , Payment Bond, Performance Bond, Warranty Bond); b. General Conditions ;
C. Special Conditions ;
d. Division One Technical Specifications ;
e. Appendix;
f. Index of Defined Terms;
g. Project Drawings and Specifications ;
h. Bid Addenda , if any;
i. Change Orders, if any;
j. ALB Notice;
k. Notice to Proceed;
I. City Standard Specifications and Details;
m. And the following: no other documents
Contractor's Obligations.

Livermore Contract Documents , page 1
Contract

EXHIBIT A
28 Contractor agrees to perform all of the Work required for the Project, as specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must provide, furnish, and supply all things necessary and incidental for the timely performance and completion of the Work, including all necessary labor, materials, equipment, transportation, and utilities, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents.

Contractor must use its best efforts to complete the Work in a professional and expeditious manner and to meet or exceed the performance standards required by the Contract Documents.

4. Payment.

As full and complete compensation for Contractor's timely performance and completion of the Work in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, City will pay Contractor Six Hundred Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-One Dollars ($617,951.00) (the "Contract Price"), in accordance with the payment provisions in the General Conditions.

5. Time for Completion.

5.1. Substantial Completion.

Contractor must achieve Substantial Completion, as that term is defined in the General Conditions, of the Project Work within 50 Working Days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. ("Substantial Completion Deadline."). For this project, the Contractor shall also incorporate 5 of average anticipated inclement Weather Days into their bid estimate.

Contractor shall be solely responsible for the extended overhead and profit for these weather days and shall not be compensated by the City in any way, reference Section 10.3 of the General Conditions and Section 013200-4.3 Contract Schedules for additional weather day information.

5.2. Final Completion
Contractor must achieve Final Completion, as that term is defined in the General Conditions, of the Project Work within 20 Working Days after the date of substantial completion. ("Final Completion Deadline.")

5.3. Early Completion.

By signing below, Contractor expressly waives any claim for delayed early completion.

6. Liquidated Damages.

If Contractor fails to meet either the Substantial Completion Deadline or the Final Completion Deadline, City may assess liquidated damages according the provisions in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents in the following amounts for each day of Unexcused Delay, and the Contract Price shall be reduced accordingly.

6.1. Substantial Completion Deadline: Five Hundred dollars ($500.00) per day.

6.2. Final Completion Deadline: Five Hundred dollars ($500.00) per day.

Livermore Contract Documents, page 2
Contract

EXHIBIT A
29 7. Labor Code Compliance.

This Contract is subject to all applicable requirements of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division 2 of the California Labor Code, including requirements pertaining to wages, working hours and workers' compensation insurance.
7 .1 . Prevailing Wages.

This Project is subject to the prevailing wage requirements applicable to the locality in which the Work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to perform the Work, including employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, apprenticeship and similar purposes. The general prevailing wage rates for each craft, classification or type of covered work are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR.

7.2. DIR Registration.

City will not accept a Bid Proposal from or enter into the Contract with a bidder without proof that the bidder and its Subcontractors are registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work under Labor Code, Section 1725.5, subject to limited legal exceptions allowed by the Labor Code.

8. Workers' Compensation Certification.

Under Labor Code, Section 1861, by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Labor Code, Section 3700 which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work on this Contract."
The successful bidder previous to the entering of the contract to do the said work shall take out and maintain in full force and effect worker's compensation insurance with an insurance carrier authorized to transact business in the State of California, covering the bidder's full liability for compensation to any persons employed who may be injured in the carrying out of said contract or the dependents thereof. Evidence of such worker's compensation insurance shall be furnished to the City of Livermore by certificate and waiver of subrogation in the City's electronic insurance certificate tracking system (Pl NS) prior to the commencement of the work and said certificate shall contain a provision that the coverage thereunder will not be canceled until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City.

9. Notice.

Any notice, billing, or payment required by the Contract Documents must be made in writing, and sent to the other party by personal delivery, U.S. Mail, a reliable overnight delivery service, facsimile, or by email as a PDF (or comparable) file. Notice is deemed effective upon delivery unless otherwise specified. Notice for each party must be given as follows:

Cit
Name JoelWaxdeck
Livermore Contract Docu ments , page 3
Contract
Contractor

EXHIBIT A
30 Livermore, CA 94550 San Francisco, CA 94127
Phone 925 960-4521 925-339-8607
Fax
Attention
Email c.com

10. General Provisions.

The following items are repeated here as stated as part of Part 2, General Conditions, for emphasis:

10.1. Assignment and Successors.

Contractor may not assign its rights or obligations under this Contract, in part or in whole, without City's written consent. This Contract is binding on Contractor's successors and permitted assigns.

A consolidation or merger of Contractor or a change in ownership of 25% or more of Contractor's capital stock constitutes an assignment by Contractor requiring the City's written consent.

10.2. Third Party Beneficiaries.

There are no intended third-party beneficiaries to this Contract except as expressly provided in the General Conditions or Special Conditions.

10.3. Governing Law and Venue.

This Contract will be governed by California law and venue will be in the Superior Court of the County in which the Project is located, and no other place.

10.4. Amendment.

No amendment or modification of this Contract will be binding unless it is in a writing duly authorized and signed by the parties to this Contract.

10.5. Integration; Severability.

This Contract and the Contract Documents incorporated herein, including authorized amendments or Change Orders thereto, constitute the final, complete, and exclusive terms of the agreement between City and Contractor. If any provision of the Contract Documents, or portion of a provision, is determined to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Contract Documents will remain in full force and effect.

11. Authorization.

Each individual signing below warrants that he or she is authorized to do so by the party that he or she represents, and that this Contract is legally binding on that party. If Contractor is a corporation, signatures from two officers of the corporation are required under California Corporation Code, Section 313.

Livermore Contract Documents, page 4
Contract

EXHIBIT A
31 The parties agree to this Contract as witnessed by the signatures below:

CITY
City of Livermore, a California Municipal
Corporation
s/ ___________ _
Marianna A. Burch, City Manager
Date: __________ _
Approved as to form:
~/)~j{/iL 4
City of Livermor~ Clty ~torney
jbnigv /rssu~t
!CA.fr,.. /-io,:izl).ri f I

CONTRACTOR
Build Corp Inc .

Name/Title [print] Jay Zhong, CFO
Date: 09/24/2025
s/ ___________ _
Name/Title [print]
Date: -----------
1066717
Expiration Da~e(s)

END OF DOCUMENT
Livermore Contract Documents, page 5
Contract

EXHIBIT A
32 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 6.3

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:

Resolution authorizing execution of an agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Commission administered 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan that provides $825,000 in funding for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution:
1 .

Authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) administered 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) that provides $825,000 in funding for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133;
2 .

Replacing $825,000 of the Measure BB-Local Streets and Roads funding in Fiscal Year 2025-26 with the ACTC CIP funding; and
3 .

Authorizing the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
The City of Livermore has been a recipient of various discretionary local funding administered by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) via their Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP).

The City applied for 2026 CIP funding for the Stanley Boulevard and Isabel Avenue Crossing Improvement Project TC202133 in October 2024, and was awarded a total of $825,000 in May 2025, with a matching funds requirement of $275,000.

The Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project is identified as a high intensity crossing improvement project in the Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Active Transportation Plan. The project will enhance trail crossing safety at the intersection, which connects to 33 the existing Iron Horse Trail and Isabel Trail.

Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) administered 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) that provides $825,000 in funding for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133

DISCUSSION
The Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) is ACTC's near-term strategic planning and programming document. Fund sources administered by ACTC, including Measures B and BB (MB/MBB), Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), and Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA), are programmed through a consolidated process to maximize investments in transportation infrastructure and program operations that are essential for enhancing, developing, and maintaining the county’s multi-modal transportation system.

The ACTC's 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) funding is available for bicycle and/or pedestrian capital projects which are programmed in the Alameda County 2020 Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP).

With support from the City Council on October 18, 2024, per Resolution 2024-180, staff applied for 2026 CIP funding in October 2024, for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133 and was awarded a total of $825,000 funding in May 2025. This funding can only be used during the project's construction phase and local matching funds of $275,000 are required.

The Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133 was initiated following a fatality between a crossing bicyclist and a turning truck at this intersection. The project scope includes implementing curb extensions, bicycle signals, right-turn restrictions during trail user crossing, signal modifications, pavement markings, signage, and signal timing adjustments to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety at the intersection. Attachment 1 shows the project location. The project is identified as a High Intensity Crossing Improvement Project in the Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trails Active Transportation Plan. The Livermore Active Transportation Plan is identified in the Countywide Transportation Plan as Project 212.

The project goal is to enhance crossing safety at the intersection, which connects the existing Iron Horse Trail and Isabel Trail. The project has a currently completed design and is in the Caltrans encroachment permit process. Construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in summer 2026.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133 is currently identified in the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan with a total funding of $1,530,000, including $100,000 of State-SB1 and $1,430,000 of Measure BB-Local Streets & Roads. With the 2026 ACTC CIP funding of $825,000, the Measure BB funding can be reduced from $1,430,000 to $605,000.

The remaining $605,000 of Measure BB qualifies for the required matching funds. The current and proposed funding for Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133 is shown in the table below.
34 Current
Proposed
SB1-Gas Tax
$100,000
$100,000
Measure BB – Local Streets &
Roads
1,430,000
605,000
ACTC CIP Funds

825,000
Total
$1,530,000
$1,530,000

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives.

GOAL
10: Work to maintain a safe and efficient local transportation network and address safety concerns.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Agreement

Prepared by: Joanna Liu
Senior Transportation Engineer

Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
35 Isabel Ave at Stanley Blvd Ramp Intersection
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA
10/2/2025, 7:16:39 AM
0 0.2 0.40.1 mi
0 0.35 0.70.17 km
1:17,017
ATTACHMENT 1

PROJECT LOCATION
36 1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT

WITH THE ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
ADMINISTERED 2026 COMPREHENSIVE INVESTMENT PLAN THAT
PROVIDES $825,000 IN FUNDING FOR THE STANLEY BOULEVARD

AT ISABEL AVENUE CONNECTOR RAMP CROSSING
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TC202133

The City of Livermore has been a recipient of various discretionary local funding administered by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) via their Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP). The City applied for 2026 CIP funding for the Stanley Boulevard and Isabel Avenue Crossing Improvement Project TC202133 in October 2024, and was awarded a total of $825,000 in May 2025, with a matching funds requirement of $275,000.

The Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Ave nue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project is identified as a high intensity crossing improvement project in the Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Active Transportation Plan. The project will enhance trail crossing safety at the intersec tion, which connects to the existing Iron Horse Trail and Isabel Trail.

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that it hereby:

1. Authorizes the City to execute an agreement with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) administered 2026 Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) , attached hereto as Exhibit A , and incorporated by this reference, that provides $825,000 in funding for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133.

2. Replaces $825,000 of Measure BB -Local Streets and Roads funding in Fiscal Year 2025 -26 for the Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project TC202133 with ACTC CIP funding.

3. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council M ember ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

37 2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Deborah L. Elam Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Senior Assistant City Attorney

Exhibit A – ACTC Agreement
38 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 1 of 17 ends

2 025 PFA Version

PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT
b
etween

ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
a
nd the

CITY OF LIVERMORE
f
or the

STANLEY BOULEVARD AT ISABEL AVENUE CONNECTOR

RAMP CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
This Project Funding Agreement (“AGREEMENT”), dated for reference purposes only as of May 22, 2 025, is by and between ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a joint powers agency (
“ALAMEDA CTC”), and the CITY OF LIVERMORE, a public agency (“PROJECT SPONSOR”).

T
his AGREEMENT obligates funds from one or more ALAMEDA CTC administered funding programs as in
dicated below, and as further specified in Appendix A: Project Control Information and Appendix B:

Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this AGREEMENT, for the PROJECT, as such term is defined in
Recital K below.
☐ 2
000 Measure B
☒ 2
014 Measure BB
☐ V
ehicle Registration Fee
☐ T
ransportation Fund for Clean Air
☐ C
MA TIP

RECITALS
A. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to the provisions of the Bay Area County Traffic and Transportation Funding Act, Public Utilities Code Section 131000, et seq., approved Measure B at the General Election held in November 1986, authorizing the collection of a one-half cent transaction and use tax over a fifteen (15)-year period to address major transportation needs and congestion in Alameda County and giving Alameda County Transportation Authority (“ACTA”) the responsibility for the administration of the proceeds of the tax. The proceeds from the 1986 Measure B tax have been and continue to be used to pay for investments as outlined in the 1986 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (“1986 TEP”), as it may be amended. Although collection of the 1986 Measure B tax ceased in 2002, capital projects funded wholly or in part by 1986 Measure B funds are still being delivered using these funds.

B. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act, Public Utilities Code Section 180000, et seq., approved the reauthorization of Measure B at the General Election held on November 7, 2000, authorizing the collection of a one-half cent transaction and use tax to be collected for twenty (20) years beginning April 1, 2002 and giving Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (“ACTIA”) responsibility for the administration of the proceeds of the tax.. The proceeds from the 2000 Measure B tax have been and continue to be used to pay for investments as outlined in the 2000 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (“2000 TEP”), as it may be amended.

C. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to Section 65089.20 of the Government Code, approved Measure F, the Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), authorizing Alameda County Congestion

EXHIBIT A

Page 1 of 30 ends

39 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 2 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
Management Agency (“ACCMA”) to administer the proceeds from a $10 per year vehicle registration fee on each annual motor-vehicle registration in Alameda County, starting with registrations effective July 2011 with collection beginning in May 2011, six months following approval of Measure F. Vehicles subject to the VRF include all motorized vehicles, including passenger cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty trucks, heavy-duty trucks, buses of all sizes, motorcycles, and motorized camper homes, unless vehicles are expressly exempted from the payment of the VRF.

D. By resolutions adopted by the ACTA and ACTIA Boards on June 24, 2010, all of ACTA’s functions and responsibilities were assigned to, and accepted by, ACTIA. On that same date, the ACTIA and ACCMA Boards took the final actions to create ALAMEDA CTC, a joint powers authority with all responsibilities of ACTIA and ACCMA. Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the ACTIA and ACCMA Boards and the Commission of A
LAMEDA CTC, ACCMA and ACTIA were terminated as of the close of business on February 29, 2012, with ALAMEDA CTC designated as the successor entity. All of its predecessors’ functions and responsibilities have been assigned to, and accepted by, ALAMEDA CTC.

E. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act, California Public Utilities Code Section 180000 et seq., approved Measure BB at the General Election held on November 4, 2014, authorizing the extension of an existing one-half of one percent transaction and use tax scheduled to terminate on March 31, 2022, and the augmentation of the tax by one-half of one percent, and giving ALAMEDA CTC responsibility for the administration of the proceeds of the 2014 Measure BB tax. The duration of the 2014 Measure BB tax will be 30 years from the initial year of collection, which began April 1, 2015, with said tax to terminate/expire on March 31, 2045. The proceeds from the 2014 Measure BB will be used to pay for investments as outlined in the 2014 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (“2014 TEP”), as it may be amended.

F. As the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (“TFCA”) Program Manager in Alameda County, A
LAMEDA CTC annually programs 40 percent of the TFCA funds collected in Alameda County. ALAMEDA CTC receives these funds from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“AIR DISTRICT”), and then distributes these funds on a reimbursement basis to eligible project sponsors.

G. ALAMEDA CTC is continuing the implementation of the CMA Exchange Program, originally established by the ACCMA, for the purpose of providing local or otherwise unrestricted funds to ALAMEDA CTC for use in projects and programs adopted into the CMA Transportation Improvement Program (“CMA TIP”) by ALAMEDA CTC.

H. The funding programs administered by ALAMEDA CTC and available for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of 1986 Measure B, 2000 Measure B, 2014 Measure BB, VRF, TFCA, and CMA TIP, are collectively defined as and shall be referenced herein as the “A
LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS”. Requirements related to 2000 Measure B, VRF and 2014 Measure BB Direct Local Distribution (“DLD”) funding distributed pursuant to 2000 Measure B, VRF and 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plans are covered by separate agreements between A
LAMEDA CTC and DLD recipients.

I. Measure B, Measure BB, VRF, and TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT shall be programmed, allocated, and expended for the purpose defined and in accordance with the provisions set

EXHIBIT A

Page 2 of 30 ends

40 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 3 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
forth in the applicable transportation expenditure plans, or the AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA County Program Manager Policies.

J. ALAMEDA CTC programs and allocates ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS through the ALAMEDA CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan (“CIP”) that is updated periodically to summarize the programming and allocations of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, and the policies, procedures and requirements related to the expenditure of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

K. The PROJECT SPONSOR is implementing a project or program (“PROJECT”) that is eligible for ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS. The PROJECT and the strategy to implement the PROJECT are described in greater detail in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

L. This AGREEMENT obligates funds from one or more of ALAMEDA CTC administered funding programs as specified in Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this Agreement, for the PROJECT and the phase(s) described in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are available to reimburse eligible costs incurred by PROJECT SPONSOR for the PROJECT and the phase(s) described in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

M. The issuance of bonds or another financing mechanism are possible funding options as part of ALAMEDA CTC administered funding programs to meet cash flow requirements of each individual program based on current schedule and project delivery information.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:

SECTION I

PROJECT SPONSOR AGREES:

1. PROJECT SPONSOR shall implement the PROJECT in accordance with all requirements in this AGREEMENT and the following appendices attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

a. Appendix A: Project Control Information
b. Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this Agreement c. Appendix C: Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements d. Appendix D: Local Business Contract Equity Program
e. Appendix E: Deliverables and Due Dates
f. Appendix F: Project Performance Measures
g. Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements

2. PROJECT SPONSOR shall perform the necessary work associated with the PROJECT required to implement PROJECT as described in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

EXHIBIT A

Page 3 of 30 ends

41 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 4 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version

3. PROJECT SPONSOR shall inform ALAMEDA CTC in writing of any changes to the information contained in Appendix A: Project Control Information as soon as PROJECT SPONSOR becomes aware of such changes. Per Section III.2, any change that requires an amendment to this AGREEMENT must be approved by ALAMEDA CTC prior to PROJECT SPONSOR implementing the change.

4. PROJECT SPONSOR shall commit to the timing of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS as described in Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this Agreement.

5. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall expend ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS received under this AGREEMENT in accordance with all applicable provisions of law and shall return to ALAMEDA CTC all funds that are not expended in accordance with all applicable provisions of law.

6. PROJECT SPONSOR shall be responsible for costs in excess of the total funding obligations shown in Appendix A: Project Control Information. Costs in excess of the total funding obligations will not be reimbursed with A
LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS unless this AGREEMENT is amended in writing or the parties execute a separate agreement for a subsequent phase of the PROJECT.

7. PROJECT SPONSOR shall return to ALAMEDA CTC, on a pro-rated basis, funds realized from the sale of any vehicle(s) purchased with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, if the sale of the vehicle(s) is completed prior to the last day of the last year listed as the PROJECT’S “Years of Effectiveness” as identified in either Appendix A: Project Control Information or Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements, as applicable. The amount of sale proceeds required to be returned to ALAMEDA CTC shall be proportional to the percentage of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS originally used to purchase the vehicle(s).

8. PROJECT SPONSOR staff costs for any local agency which receives DLD funding shall not be eligible for reimbursement from ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS allocated to the PROJECT unless staff costs are specifically identified as eligible in Appendix A: Project Control Information. Staff costs included in Appendix A are limited to project implementation costs. Staff costs related to the administration of this A
GREEMENT including preparation of requests for reimbursement or progress reports are ineligible for reimbursement. PROJECT SPONSOR staff costs funded by other sources can be included in the total cost for the purpose of meeting the cost and risk sharing provisions of this AGREEMENT.

9. PROJECT SPONSOR staff costs eligible for reimbursement may include the individual’s actual hourly wage plus a fringe benefit rate, as approved by a cognizant agency or an independent auditor, of up to a maximum of 70% of the hourly wage. Staff costs also may include direct costs including contracted services, such as legal counsel, that are considered an extension of the P ROJECT SPONSOR’S staff.

10. PROJECT SPONSOR overhead, or "indirect," costs are not eligible for reimbursement from ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT, and shall not be included in the total eligible PROJECT cost calculations used to determine the ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS share of such total eligible PROJECT costs.

EXHIBIT A

Page 4 of 30 ends

42 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 5 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version

11. The cost of maintenance, security, or protection performed by P ROJECT SPONSOR or third- party contractors during any temporary suspension of activities associated with the P ROJECT will not be considered an eligible cost for reimbursement by ALAMEDA CTC.

12. PROJECT SPONSOR shall advertise, award and administer all professional services and construction contracts for PROJECT work not performed by PROJECT SPONSOR. PROJECT SPONSOR shall invite ALAMEDA CTC staff to participate as a voting member of PROJECT SPONSOR’s selection panel for the selection of all professional consultants.

13. All locally funded contracts approved by P
ROJECT SPONSOR, funded wholly or in part with
Measure B, Measure BB, and/or Vehicle Registration Fee funds administered by ALAMEDA CTC, except for contracts that also include state and/or federal funds or contracts funding non-capital projects (e.g., transit operations), are required to comply with A
LAMEDA CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program as listed and described in Appendix D: Local Business Contract Equity Program Requirements. PROJECT SPONSOR shall comply with the reporting requirements set forth in the LBCE Program and provide the required information to ALAMEDA CTC in accordance with Appendix D for all contracts partially or wholly funded by ALAMEDA CTC, whether or not the specific contract is subject to the LBCE Program. If ALAMEDA CTC determines that PROJECT SPONSOR has failed to fully comply with all LBCE Program requirements, including but not limited to meeting all reporting requirements in a timely manner, ALAMEDA CTC may take one or more of the following actions, until compliance or remedial action has been accomplished by the PROJECT SPONSOR to the satisfaction of ALAMEDA CTC:

a. Deem PROJECT SPONSOR to be noncompliant, and place PROJECT SPONSOR on a corrective action plan;
b. Impose sanctions on PROJECT SPONSOR, including suspension and termination of all ALAMEDA CTC funding assistance;
c. Decline approval of projects, grants, or contracts;
d. Withhold reimbursements to PROJECT SPONSOR for existing grants and contracts; and/or e. Other actions deemed appropriate by ALAMEDA CTC under the circumstances.

14. To facilitate ALAMEDA CTC’s monitoring of PROJECT SPONSOR’s compliance with the LBCE Program, PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide ALAMEDA CTC with drafts of (i) all procurement documents which address (or would be expected to address) LBCE Program or Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation goals and requirements (i.e., RFPs, RFQs, construction special provisions, and notices to bidders/proposers), in each case prior to advertisement, and (ii) P ROJECT SPONSOR’s form
professional services contract, prior to contract award.

15. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall require insurance coverage that names ALAMEDA CTC, its governing body, officers, employees and consultants as additional insureds of the PROJECT SPONSOR, professional services consultants and subconsultants, construction services contractors and subcontractors, volunteer service individuals, and any other contractors or subcontractors involved with the PROJECT on all insurance required by PROJECT SPONSOR for PROJECT. PROJECT SPONSOR shall keep and maintain insurance certificates and policy endorsements evidencing the policies on file, and furnish the same to A
LAMEDA CTC upon request. ALAMEDA CTC will not be responsible for any premiums or assessments on

EXHIBIT A

Page 5 of 30 ends

43 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 6 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
any policy. If this AGREEMENT includes any TFCA funds, PROJECT SPONSOR shall also comply with the insurance requirements specified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements.

16. PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide ALAMEDA CTC with periodic (i.e., quarterly or semi- annually) progress reports describing the current status of the PROJECT. The required progress reporting frequency schedule and forms are provided in Appendix C: Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements. Progress reports are due by the last day of each calendar month following the established reporting period in which the work was performed. These reports shall include PROJECT status information such as the scope of work completed to date, total costs incurred, future actions, project performance, issues identification, changes to scope or schedule, and any additional relevant information requested by A
LAMEDA CTC.

17. PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit to ALAMEDA CTC a Request for Reimbursement in accordance with the minimum required invoicing frequency established for the PROJECT, but not more than one such request per month, for reimbursement of eligible PROJECT costs and expenses incurred by PROJECT SPONSOR. The required minimum invoicing frequency and invoice forms are provided in Appendix C:

Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements. If PROJECT SPONSOR does not incur any reimbursable expenses during the minimum invoicing period, in lieu of submitting an invoice, PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit a letter or a statement as part of the required progress report for the same period confirming that no reimbursable costs were incurred during the given period. If PROJECT SPONSOR requests reimbursement for costs incurred as a result of a contract or agreement with a third party that contains a contract value of $50,000 or greater, e.g. a consultant, contractor or other entity, P ROJECT
SPONSOR shall submit an electronic copy of the fully executed contract or agreement to ALAMEDA CTC prior to ALAMEDA CTC authorizing reimbursement of such costs. Supporting documentation for the Request for Reimbursement packages includes copies of invoices from vendors, consultants, or contractors and summaries of eligible PROJECT SPONSOR staff time charges. PROJECT SPONSOR may suggest an alternative method, subject to approval in advance by ALAMEDA CTC, to document staff costs charged to the PROJECT.

18. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall submit to ALAMEDA CTC a Prime Consultant/Contractor LBE, SLBE, and VSLBE Utilization Report with each of PROJECT SPONSOR’s invoices for the PROJECT, regardless of whether any reimbursable costs were incurred during the given period. The report shall include the AGREEMENT number, prime consultant/contractor name, the project title, scope of work, names of all subconsultants and their contract budgets and total costs incurred, and any additional relevant information requested by ALAMEDA CTC.

19. PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide a Parcel and Utility Agreement Tracking Log upon ALAMEDA CTC’s request, if the PROJECT includes the acquisition of right-of-way and/or the relocation or protection of utility facilities.

20. PROJECT SPONSOR shall keep all necessary PROJECT records to demonstrate compliance with this AGREEMENT, including documentation of activities, performance, progress reports, final report, expenses and charges to support invoices submitted to ALAMEDA CTC and other PROJECT reporting requirements as described in Appendix C: Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements in one central location for a period of not less than five (5) years after the later of (i) ALAMEDA

EXHIBIT A

Page 6 of 30 ends

44 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 7 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
CTC’s payment of the final invoice, (ii) the PROJECT SPONSOR’S submittal of the Final Report for ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS under this AGREEMENT, and (iii) the end of the PROJECT’S established “Years of Effectiveness” period (as identified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements) if any TFCA funds are provided under this AGREEMENT.

a. PROJECT SPONSOR and PROJECT SPONSOR’s contractors and subcontractors shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts.

b. PROJECT SPONSOR shall allow ALAMEDA CTC or its authorized representatives to inspect, audit, or make copies of any PROJECT records for a period of five (5) years after ALAMEDA CTC’s payment of the final invoice and the PROJECT SPONSOR’S submittal of the Final Report. The same access also shall be granted to the AIR DISTRICT or its authorized representatives for TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT.

21. PROJECT SPONSOR shall comply with all of the following publicity requirements to inform the public on the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS on the PROJECT.

a. PROJECT SPONSOR shall credit ALAMEDA CTC as a funding source and display the approved ALAMEDA CTC logo, where practical, on construction informational signs, vehicles or equipment operated or obtained as part of the PROJECT, and on any publicly distributed information (e.g., fact sheets, flyers, brochures, maps, schedules, websites, press releases), created for or associated with the PROJECT. For TFCA funding obligated through this AGREEMENT, SPONSOR shall also credit the AIR DISTRICT as a funding source and display the AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA logo.

b. PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide updated and accurate PROJECT information on the PROJECT SPONSOR’s website, or create such a website if none exists, and provide a link to ALAMEDA CTC website.

c. PROJECT SPONSOR shall publish an article in a printed or electronically distributed publication such as a newsletter, local newspaper, e-publications, or website highlighting the P
ROJECT and the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS at least once per fiscal year.

For TFCA funding obligated through this AGREEMENT, SPONSOR shall also credit the AIR DISTRICT as a funding source.

d. PROJECT SPONSOR shall document compliance with the publicity requirements and furnish such documentation upon request, and regularly through the progress and final reporting required by this AGREEMENT, through evidence such as photos of construction and vehicle signage, copies of print, electronic and other media published to satisfy this requirement.

For TFCA funding obligated through this A
GREEMENT, SPONSOR shall also document that
the AIR DISTRICT was credited as a funding source and the AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA logos were displayed.

EXHIBIT A

Page 7 of 30 ends

45 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 8 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
e. PROJECT SPONSOR shall notify ALAMEDA CTC and request an exemption as soon as it is reasonably known that the PROJECT SPONSOR is unable to fulfill the requirements under this Section I.21 due to extraordinary circumstances.

22. PROJECT SPONSOR shall, to the extent not otherwise prohibited by law, and to the extent required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code section 7920.000 et seq.), place in the public domain any software, written document, or other product developed with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS received through this AGREEMENT.

23. PROJECT SPONSOR shall participate, upon the request of ALAMEDA CTC, in a Public Awareness Program in partnership with ALAMEDA CTC and/or its community advisory committees as a means of informing the public of the benefits derived from the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

24. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall obtain all state, local and federal permits and approvals for work, including environmental approvals in accordance with the National Environment Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as applicable. PROJECT SPONSOR will comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations.

25. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall render a report or answer any and all inquiries, upon A LAMEDA CTC’s request, in regards to its receipt of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, compliance audit findings, and usage of A LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS before the A LAMEDA CTC Commission, Independent Watchdog Committee, and/or community advisory committees, as applicable.

26. For TFCA funds obligated by this A
GREEMENT, a PROJECT SPONSOR who has failed a AIR
DISTRICT financial or performance audit for the PROJECT will be excluded from receiving an award of any TFCA funds for five (5) years from the date of AIR DISTRICT’s final audit determination. Existing TFCA funds already awarded to the SPONSOR will not be released until all audit recommendations and remedies have been satisfactorily implemented. A failed AIR DISTRICT financial audit means a final audit report that includes an uncorrected audit finding that confirms an ineligible expenditure of TFCA funds. A failed AIR DISTRICT performance audit means that the PROJECT was not implemented in accordance with the AGREEMENT. SPONSOR shall be afforded a reasonable amount of time to address/cure adverse audit findings.

27. For TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall return to ALAMEDA CTC, on a pro-rated basis, TFCA funds received under this Agreement if PROJECT is not maintained and/or operated throughout, and at least until the conclusion of, its “Years of Effectiveness” as identified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements.

28. For TFCA funds obligated by this A
GREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit a TFCA
Final Report to ALAMEDA CTC when identified as applicable in Appendix C: Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements. The required content for the TFCA Final Report is identified in the TFCA Final Report Form referenced in Appendix G.

EXHIBIT A

Page 8 of 30 ends

46 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 9 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version

SECTION II

ALAMEDA CTC AGREES:

1. ALAMEDA CTC shall make a good faith effort to provide all ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT.

2. ALAMEDA CTC shall assist PROJECT SPONSOR when able, upon request and as necessary, in resolving issues related to the PROJECT.

3. ALAMEDA CTC shall provide a copy of its approved logo for PROJECT SPONSOR to use as required by this AGREEMENT.

4. ALAMEDA CTC shall provide notice to the PROJECT SPONSOR of any and all expenditures made by PROJECT SPONSOR, which are not in compliance with the AGREEMENT or the applicable ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS promptly after ALAMEDA CTC becomes aware of any such expenditures.

5. ALAMEDA CTC shall provide timely notice to PROJECT SPONSOR prior to conducting an audit of expenditures made by PROJECT SPONSOR to determine whether such expenditures are compliant with this AGREEMENT or the applicable ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

SECTION III

IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT may be shifted between the phases of the PROJECT or between activities in the same phase of the PROJECT, so long as each of the following occurs: 1) PROJECT SPONSOR submits a written amendment request that provides revised and updated Appendix A: Project Control Information forms documenting the requested funding obligation shift and demonstrating to A
LAMEDA CTC’s satisfaction that the phase or activity from which the funds were shifted remains fully funded, and 2) the parties execute an amendment to this AGREEMENT incorporating the revised and updated Appendix A forms as described above, which amendment shall be approved by A
LAMEDA CTC pursuant to applicable ALAMEDA CTC policies.

2. A
LAMEDA CTC and the PROJECT SPONSOR may jointly authorize an “Administrative Amendment” for any minor schedule revisions, deliverables, or budget revisions that do not increase the total ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT. Any change in the PROJECT scope of work must be approved by ALAMEDA CTC prior to implementation of the change by the PROJECT SPONSOR. Administrative amendment requests sent to ALAMEDA CTC must include a revised Appendix A:

Project Control Information which reflects the requested changes by the PROJECT SPONSOR.

3. For the purposes of this A
GREEMENT, (i) a “Contract” shall mean and refer to a third party agreement with the PROJECT SPONSOR for services related to PROJECT, including agreements with another public agency, consultant firm, contractor or entity; (ii) “PROJECT SPONSOR Staff” costs include costs for

EXHIBIT A

Page 9 of 30 ends

47 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 10 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
staff dedicated directly to project implementation, management, oversight, and/or project development and may include direct costs including contracted services, such as legal counsel, that are considered an extension of PROJECT SPONSOR Staff; (iii) “Capital” with respect to any Right-of-Way Capital phase shall mean and refer to the cost to acquire real property, access rights and other property interests; and (iv) “Agreement Expiration Date” shall mean and refer to the expiration date of this AGREEMENT.

4. Reimbursable costs will be limited to the costs shown in Appendix A: Project Control Information. Funds expended for work directly related to the phases of the PROJECT covered by this AGREEMENT prior to the applicable allowable start date identified in Appendix B: ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS Obligated by this AGREEMENT are ineligible for reimbursement pursuant to this AGREEMENT. ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are subject to fund availability and any new requirements and policies imposed by ALAMEDA CTC. The AGREEMENT shall be amended, as necessary, to reflect the applicable requirements.

5. If additional local, state or federal funding is obtained to partially offset A

LAMEDA CTC
ADMINISTERED FUNDS planned for the PROJECT, ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS will not be transferred from the PROJECT until after it is ensured that all phases of the PROJECT can be fully delivered.

ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS offset by additional local, state or federal funding shall be available for PROJECT only after all other funding planned for PROJECT, as described in Appendix A: Project Control Information, has been committed and/or encumbered to the PROJECT.

6. Should any portion of PROJECT be financed with federal or state funds, all applicable laws, rules and policies relating to the use of such funds shall apply, notwithstanding other provisions of this AGREEMENT.

7. For TFCA funds obligated by this A
GREEMENT, this AGREEMENT is subject to the current
AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies included in Appendix G:

Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements and any new requirements imposed by the AIR DISTRICT upon ALAMEDA CTC with respect to the TFCA funds distributed hereunder. ALAMEDA CTC will only distribute TFCA funds under this AGREEMENT to the extent the documented project costs are eligible under the applicable AIR DISTRICT TFCA Policies.

8. The laws of the State of California shall govern this AGREEMENT.

9. All correspondence and communications will contain ALAMEDA CTC project number and name for PROJECT in a clearly identifiable location. For projects with TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, all correspondence and communications will also contain the TFCA project number as identified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements.

10. A
LAMEDA CTC reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT work and records when determined to be necessary or appropriate and PROJECT SPONSOR agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with ALAMEDA CTC by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records promptly available for audit and copying.

EXHIBIT A

Page 10 of 30 ends

48 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 11 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version

11. PROJECT costs incurred by PROJECT SPONSOR are only eligible for reimbursement on a pro- rated basis unless specifically provided for in Appendix A: Project Control Information, and P ROJECT SPONSOR is expected to concurrently seek reimbursement from the other sources shown in Project A: Project Control Information. Pro-rated basis, as used herein, equals the amount of A LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this A GREEMENT to a phase, divided by the total funding for the phase, as shown in Appendix A: Project Control Information. For any Request for Reimbursement which includes such expenditures, PROJECT SPONSOR shall (i) report the total expenditures during the reimbursement period, (ii) indicate the percentage of the total expenditures for the phase expected to be funded by A LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT, and (iii) request reimbursement for the dollar amount which equals the product of such total expenditures and such percentage.

12. ALAMEDA CTC approval of PROJECT SPONSOR submitted Requests for Reimbursement will be contingent on the submittal of progress reports and deliverables by PROJECT SPONSOR as required by this AGREEMENT. In the event that progress reports and deliverables are not complete and current, approval of Requests for Reimbursement shall be withheld until an acceptable remedy has been implemented and approved by A
LAMEDA CTC. If PROJECT SPONSOR fails to submit the required deliverables or otherwise fails to meet the reporting and invoicing requirements of this AGREEMENT, ALAMEDA CTC may deobligate funds from the PROJECT and this AGREEMENT. Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of any such action, ALAMEDA CTC will endeavor to notify PROJECT SPONSOR in writing that the required deliverables, invoicing and reporting is overdue.

13. Request for Reimbursements submitted after the Agreement Expiration Date identified in Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this AGREEMENT will be ineligible for reimbursement by ALAMEDA CTC unless an exception is requested by the PROJECT SPONSOR no less than sixty (60) days before the Agreement Expiration Date, and the exception is approved by ALAMEDA CTC.

ALAMEDA CTC will deobligate any remaining ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS from PROJECT and this AGREEMENT.

14. Each Right-of-Way transaction which is funded either wholly or in part with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS shall be subject to repayment or reimbursement to ALAMEDA CTC under ALAMEDA CTC Policies in effect as of the effective date of this AGREEMENT, irrespective of the party holding title to the real estate which is the subject of the Right-of-Way transaction in question. The parties agree that Section III.15(a) through Section III.15(f), the provisions of which are intended to provide further detail regarding the application of such Policies, shall govern the extent to which such repayment is required and the conditions applicable to any such repayment. If such Policies are amended after the effective date of this A
GREEMENT by ALAMEDA CTC, the PROJECT SPONSOR and ALAMEDA CTC shall execute an amendment to this AGREEMENT which references the revised Policies.

15. For the purposes of the following provisions, “A
LAMEDA CTC Share” shall mean the
percentage share of the original property purchase price funded by ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS (i.e., if the purchase was fully funded by ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, ALAMEDA CTC Share shall equal 100%); any appraisal required under Section III.15(a) and Section III.15(f) only, shall be conducted at no cost to A
LAMEDA CTC; “Fair Market Value” of a given property shall mean the net proceeds from the sale of such property if such sale occurs in an open market transaction or by auction, or the value of the property determined by an independent third-party appraisal of the property if some or all of the property is

EXHIBIT A

Page 11 of 30 ends

49 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 12 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
retained by PROJECT SPONSOR or otherwise transferred to any other party without an auction or open market transaction; and “CPI” means the Consumer Price Index, All Items for All Urban Consumers, San Francisco- Oakland, San Jose, CA.

a. If any property is acquired for the PROJECT using ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS to finance some or all of the acquisition, and the PROJECT is cancelled or otherwise does not begin construction within five (5) years after the effective date of AGREEMENT (as such deadline may be extended by agreement between the parties hereto), then PROJECT SPONSOR shall, within one (1) year after such cancellation decision or the expiration of such five (5) year period, reimburse ALAMEDA CTC for the greater of the following:

ALAMEDA CTC Share of the property’s Fair Market Value or the full amount of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS used to acquire the property, as escalated by the increase in the CPI during the most recent period for which CPI data is available which is equal in length to the period between the date ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS were paid to PROJECT SPONSOR and the date reimbursement is made to ALAMEDA CTC.

b. If any property is acquired for the PROJECT using ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS to finance some or all of the acquisition and only a portion of the acquired property is required for the P
ROJECT, and if the PROJECT begins construction within five (5) years after the effective date of this AGREEMENT (as such deadline may be extended by agreement between the parties hereto), then PROJECT SPONSOR shall, within one (1) year after PROJECT completion, reimburse ALAMEDA CTC for ALAMEDA CTC Share of the Fair Market Value of any property determined to be “excess property”.

c. If the PROJECT begins construction within five (5) years after the effective date of this AGREEMENT (as such deadline may be extended by agreement between the parties hereto), then except as provided in subparagraph (d) below, no reimbursement is due with respect to any property interest acquired for the project using A

LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED
FUNDS if the entirety of the acquired property is required for the PROJECT.

d. If PROJECT SPONSOR anticipates receiving net revenues (i.e., rental or other income generated by the property, less reasonable costs for insurance, maintenance and related items) from any property acquired using A

LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS,
PROJECT SPONSOR shall notify ALAMEDA CTC on how PROJECT SPONSOR will use such revenue to offset other project costs, and document such revenue separately in project reimbursement requests.

e. If P
ROJECT is suspended, PROJECT SPONSOR shall pay all property management costs.

f. Property that is required for the PROJECT and acquired wholly or in part with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS shall be available for PROJECT construction within ten (10) years of ALAMEDA CTC reimbursement to the PROJECT SPONSOR. If, after ten (10) years, PROJECT has not been completed, PROJECT SPONSOR shall reimburse ALAMEDA CTC Share of the fair market value of the property, based on the net proceeds from the sale of

EXHIBIT A

Page 12 of 30 ends

50 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 13 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
the property or an appraisal of the property conducted at no cost to ALAMEDA CTC, within one (1) year after the expiration of this ten (10) year period.

16. If condemnation procedures are required to obtain possession to Right-of-Way, ALAMEDA CTC will consider the required deposit as an eligible cost and reimburse the PROJECT SPONSOR upon request.

PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit documentation of the final order of condemnation settlement within ninety (90) days after the date of the court recording of the final order of condemnation. If the amount of ALAMEDA CTC reimbursement to the PROJECT SPONSOR is higher than ALAMEDA CTC Share of the amount of settlement in the final order of condemnation, the PROJECT SPONSOR shall pay ALAMEDA CTC the difference between the amount reimbursed and ALAMEDA CTC Share of the amount settled plus ALAMEDA CTC Share of the interest accrued to the deposit account within one (1) year of the final order of condemnation.

17. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall not initiate condemnation of any property until full funding for the construction of the PROJECT has been secured.

18. Reimbursement to P
ROJECT SPONSOR by ALAMEDA CTC for PROJECT Right-of-Way is limited to the following (and net of any relocation payments provided by other sources):

a. The cost to purchase all real property required for the PROJECT free and clear of liens and/or conflicting easements, including the costs for preparation of documents, negotiations and legal services.

b. The cost of damages to owners of the remainder of real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by P
ROJECT.

c. The cost of relocation payments and services provided to owners and occupants pursuant to the appropriate State laws and regulations when the PROJECT displaces an individual, family, business, farm operation or nonprofit organization.

d. The cost of demolition and/or the sale of all improvements on the right-of-way. Proceeds from the sale of any such improvements shall be credited to the PROJECT and used to offset PROJECT costs.

e. The cost of all unavoidable utility relocation, protection or removal necessary for the completion of the PROJECT.

f. The cost of all necessary hazardous material and hazardous waste treatment, encapsulation or removal and protective storage for which PROJECT SPONSOR accepts responsibility and where the actual generator cannot be identified and recovery made.

19. If PROJECT SPONSOR materially breaches this AGREEMENT, including but not limited to (i) failing to deliver the PROJECT within the schedule defined by this AGREEMENT without compelling reason, (ii) failing to file required progress reports in the time specified by this AGREEMENT, or (iii) failing to comply with applicable regulations, ALAMEDA CTC may either terminate this AGREEMENT or suspend payments to

EXHIBIT A

Page 13 of 30 ends

51 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 14 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
PROJECT SPONSOR until such time as PROJECT SPONSOR makes reasonable efforts to cure any such breach and comply with all provisions of this AGREEMENT.

20. Neither ALAMEDA CTC, nor its governing body or any officer, consultant, or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by PROJECT SPONSOR in connection with the PROJECT. It is also understood and agreed, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, PROJECT SPONSOR shall fully defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless ALAMEDA CTC, its governing body, and all its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-in- interest, against any and all liability, loss, expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, or claims for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) or damages occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by PROJECT SPONSOR in connection with PROJECT, including the performance of the PROJECT or operation or use of the equipment that is subject to this AGREEMENT. If TFCA funds are obligated by this AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall also fully defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless the AIR DISTRICT, its governing body, and all its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-in- interest, from any liability imposed on the AIR DISTRICT for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by PROJECT SPONSOR in connection with PROJECT.

21. Neither PROJECT SPONSOR, nor its governing body or any officer, consultant, or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by A
LAMEDA CTC under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to ALAMEDA CTC under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, ALAMEDA CTC shall fully defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless PROJECT SPONSOR, its governing body, and all its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-in-interest, against any and all liability, loss, expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, or claims for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) or damages occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ALAMEDA CTC in connection with PROJECT, including the performance of the PROJECT or operation or use of the equipment that is subject to this AGREEMENT.

22. Nothing in the provisions of this A
GREEMENT is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not party to this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than ALAMEDA CTC and PROJECT SPONSOR and has no third-party beneficiaries.

23. All legal actions by either party against the other arising from this A GREEMENT, or for the failure to perform in accordance with the applicable standard of care, or for any other cause of action, will be subject to the statutes of limitations of the State of California.

24. Should it become necessary to enforce the terms of this A GREEMENT, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to recover reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees from the other party.

25. This AGREEMENT shall terminate upon the Agreement Expiration Date identified in Appendix B: Funds Obligated by this AGREEMENT unless this AGREEMENT is extended by mutual agreement of the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Sections I.7, I.19, III.20 and III.21 shall survive the termination or expiration of this AGREEMENT. PROJECT SPONSOR has 90 days after the Agreement Expiration Date to submit complete and accurate invoices to ALAMEDA CTC to make final allowable

EXHIBIT A

Page 14 of 30 ends

52 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 15 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version
payments for PROJECT costs in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. Failure to submit complete and accurate invoices within this period of time shall result in a waiver by PROJECT SPONSOR of its right to reimbursement of expended costs for which invoices have not yet been submitted.

26. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of either party on any breach or default by the other party shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

27. This A
GREEMENT, including its Recitals and Appendices, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be changed only as allowed in Sections III.1 and Section III.2 of this AGREEMENT or by a written amendment executed by both parties.

[Signatures on the next page]

EXHIBIT A

Page 15 of 30 ends

53 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 16 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version

CITY OF LIVERMORE
(PROJECT SPONSOR)

ALAMEDA COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
(ALAMEDA CTC)
By: By:

Marianna A. Burch Date
City Manager
Tony Tavares Date
Executive Director
Recommended
By:

Vivek Bhat Date
Senior Director of Programming and
Projects

Reviewed as to Budget/Financial Controls:

By:

Patricia Reavey Date
Deputy Executive Director of
Finance and Administration
Approved as to Legal Form:

Approved as to Legal Form:

By:

Tara Mazzanti Date
Senior Assistant City Attorney
Legal Counsel to CITY OF LIVERMORE
Fennemore LLP Date
Legal Counsel to ALAMEDA CTC

EXHIBIT A

Page 16 of 30 ends

54 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000

Page 17 of 17 ends

2025 PFA Version

LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: P ROJECT CONTROL INFORMATION
Appendix A-1 Project Description
Appendix A-2 Project Scope Detail by Phase
Appendix A-3 Project Milestone Schedule
Appendix A-4 Project Cost Estimate Summary by Phase and Fund Source Appendix A-5 Project Funding Summary by Phase and Reimbursement Ratio Appendix A-6 Project Phase Cost Detail

APPENDIX B: A LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS OBLIGATED BY THIS AGREEMENT

APPENDIX C: A LAMEDA CTC REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

APPENDIX D: L OCAL BUSINESS CONTRACT EQUITY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

A
PPENDIX E: D ELIVERABLES AND DUE DATES

A
PPENDIX F: P ROJECT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

A
PPENDIX G: T RANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS Appendix G-1 TFCA Project Number and “Years of Effectiveness” Appendix G-2 TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies and Insurance Requirements Appendix G-3 Air District TFCA Logos

Note: Appendix G is
only included and attached to this AGREEMENT if TFCA funds are obligated and applicable to AGREEMENT.

EXHIBIT A

Page 17 of 30 ends

55 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 1

APPENDIX A

PROJECT CONTROL INFORMATION

Appendix Index

Appendix A-1 Project Description
Appendix A-2 Project Scope Detail by Phase
Appendix A-3 Project Milestone Schedule
Appendix A-4 Project Cost Estimate Summary by Phase and Fund Source Appendix A-5 Project Funding Summary by Phase and Reimbursement Ratio Appendix A-6 Project Phase Cost Detail

EXHIBIT A

Page 18 of 30 ends

56 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 2
APPENDIX A-1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project Description:

The Stanley Boulevard at Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp Crossing Improvements Project is located at the intersection of Stanley Boulevard and Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp, which connects the Iron Horse Trail and Isabel Trail. The project scope includes implementing protected intersection concepts, e.g. curb extensions, pedestrian/bicycle ramps, bicycle signals, pavement markings and signages, etc.

The project will also program leading pedestrian intervals and install blankout signs.

The project goal is to enhance trail crossing safety at the intersection. The project will also install an overlapping phase to increase the vehicular traffic level of service.

Project Location and Limits
• Stanley Boulevard and Isabel Avenue Connector Ramp

EXHIBIT A

Page 19 of 30 ends

57 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 3
APPENDIX A-2

PROJECT SCOPE DETAIL BY PHASE

The ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are to support the project phase(s) identified and described below:

CONSTRUCTION
• Construction of protected intersection concepts and improvements as PROJECT is further described in Appendix A-1.

Non-Participating Costs / Not Eligible for Reimbursement Costs not eligible for reimbursement by this AGREEMENT include, but are not necessarily limited to:
• Costs incurred for services, fees, or amenities not related to the PROJECT scope that are funded through ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT as the eligible scope is defined in Appendix A-1: Project Description and Appendix A-2: Project Scope Detail by Phase. • Sponsor Staff/Labor costs unless otherwise defined as allowed in Appendix A-6: Project Cost Detail.

EXHIBIT A

Page 20 of 30 ends

58 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 4
APPENDIX A-3

PROJECT MILESTONE SCHEDULE

Phase/Milestone
Begin
(Mo/Yr)
End
(Mo/Yr)
Construction
Release Request for Proposal / Advertisement 09/2025 10/2025 Contract Award 12/2025 12/2025
Construction Activity 01/2026 07/2026
Contract Acceptance 08/2026
Project Closeout 09/2026 10/2026

EXHIBIT A

Page 21 of 30 ends

59 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 5
APPENDIX A-4

PROJECT COST SUMMARY BY PHASE AND FUND SOURCE
This Project Cost Summary provides a project funding plan for all Project phases, regardless if funded through ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT.

Notes:

1. ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS identified with a Note 1 are shown within this Project Cost Summary for funding plan informational purposes. These funds are not encumbered within this A GREEMENT.

2. To Be Determined (TBD) Column includes unknown and unsecured funding amounts to the project.

PROJECT COST SUMMARY BY PHASE AND FUND SOURCE
PHASE
Alameda CTC
Administered
Funds
Sponsor
Funds Total
Funding
2014 MBB
TEP-44
Various
Sources
Final Design (PS&E) $ - $200,000 $200,000
Construction $825,000 $275,000 $1,100,000
Total Project Cost $825,000 $475,000 $1,300,000

EXHIBIT A

Page 22 of 30 ends

60 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 6
APPENDIX A-5

PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY BY PHASE AND REIMBURSEMENT RATIO (Only Phases Funded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds)

The ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are to support the project phase(s) identified and described below:

PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY BY PHASE AND REIMBURSEMENT RATIO PHASE
Alameda CTC
Administered
Funds
Matching
Funds

Total
Funding

Reimbursement
Ratio
Percentage 2014 MBB
TEP-44
Construction $825,000 $275,000 $1,100,000 75.00%
Total Funding $825,000 $275,000 $1,100,000

Notes:

1. PROJECT SPONSOR shall be reimbursed eligible costs in the percentage of Total A LAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS to Total Funding per the Reimbursement Ratio Percentage for each phase. Each Alameda CTC Administered Fund amount identified is a not-to-exceed amount. The Reimbursement Ratio is defined as ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS divided by the Total Funding.

EXHIBIT A

Page 23 of 30 ends

61 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix A – Page 7
APPENDIX A-6

PROJECT PHASE COST DETAIL
This Project Phase Cost Detail summarizes the total cost for each phase with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated in this AGREEMENT.

PHASE COST DETAIL
CONSTRUCTION 2014 MBB
TEP-44
Matching
Funds Total Cost
Sponsor Staff/Labor Cost $ - $ - $ -
Contract(s) $825,000 $275,000 $1,100,000
Other Direct Costs $ - $ - $ -
Total Phase Cost
(Staff + Contract Costs + Other Direct Costs) $825,000 $275,000 $1,100,000

Notes:
• The costs and fund sources for all contracts for professional services or construction for the Project shall be shown in the “Contract(s)” line. “Other Direct Costs” consists of expenditures on such items as delivery services, printing services, and travel, where no RFPs/RFQs or bids are required. • Contracts funded with any combination of Measure B, Measure BB, Vehicle Registration Fee and local funds that do not contain State or federal funds are subject to Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity Program (refer to Appendix D).
• Costs and funds may be moved between Contract(s) and Other Direct Costs through an Administrative Amendment pursuant to Section III.2 of this AGREEMENT, so long as (i) ALAMEDA CTC is notified in advance prior to any expenditures on either category in excess of the amounts then shown in this table, and (ii) any proposed amendment which changes the Total Costs for Contract(s) from zero to a positive number must be approved by A
LAMEDA CTC prior to PROJECT SPONSOR seeking proposals, qualifications, or bids for such contract(s).

EXHIBIT A

Page 24 of 30 ends

62 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix B – Page 1

APPENDIX B

ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS OBLIGATED BY THIS AGREEMENT The following Table B-1 identifies the ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT and establishes a unique allowable start date for each obligated fund source.

TABLE B-1

FUNDS OBLIGATED BY THIS AGREEMENT

AND ALLOWABLE START AND EXPENDITURE DEADLINE DATES
Fund
Source
Fund
Subset Phase
Commission
Approval
Date
Allowable
Start Date
Expenditure
Deadline
Date
Obligated
Amount
2014 MBB TEP-44 CON 5/22/2025 7/1/2025 12/31/2026 $825,000 Total Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by AGREEMENT: $825,000

Agreement Expiration Date: December 31, 2026

Notes:

1. ALAMEDA CTC reimbursement amounts by fund source for P ROJECT shall not exceed the total amount obligated by this AGREEMENT, by fund source.

2. The Commission Approval Date is the date of the meeting at which the Commission approved the allocation.

3. The Allowable Start Date identified for each fund source is the earliest date at which costs eligible for reimbursement by the fund source indicated may be incurred. Any costs incurred on the P ROJECT before this date will not be eligible for reimbursement under this A GREEMENT. The earliest Allowable Start Date shown in this column represents the effective date of this AGREEMENT. The Allowable Start Date may be established as early as the Commission Approval Date of the allocation.

4. The Expenditure Deadline Date is the last date by which eligible reimbursable costs may be incurred. Any costs incurred on the PROJECT after this date will not be eligible for reimbursement under this A GREEMENT.

5. The Agreement Expiration Date shall mean and refer to the expiration date of this A GREEMENT.

6. For TFCA funds obligated by this agreement, the Expenditure Deadline Date in the above table is two (2) years from the date when A
LAMEDA CTC first received funds from the AIR DISTRICT, unless an extended deadline is approved at the time of programming, or an extension has been approved by A LAMEDA CTC. An estimated deadline date is noted in the above table if at the time of this agreement Alameda CTC has yet to receive funds from the A
IR DISTRICT. Extended deadlines will be reflected in an amended Table B-1, once approved.

EXHIBIT A

Page 25 of 30 ends

63 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix C – Page 1

APPENDIX C

REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The below table establishes the required minimum frequency for Requests for Reimbursement and Progress Reports, and final closeout reporting requirements, as indicated below with an “X”.

Notes:

1. For all projects, the maximum frequency for Requests for Reimbursement is one (1) per month.

2. A progress report required regardless of whether expenses occurred or not during the reporting period.

REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING FORMS
Any PROJECT SPONSOR awarded ALAMEDA CTC Administered Funds shall use the following forms included in the link below for progress reporting, final reporting, request for reimbursements, and agreement amendment requests. Note that the format and required content of these forms is subject to change.

List of Downloadable Forms: https://www.alamedactc.org/funding/reporting-and-gra nt-forms/

1. Request for Reimbursement (RFR) Form

2. Alameda CTC Progress Report Form

3. Alameda CTC Final Report Form

4. Amendment Request Form

REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING

FREQUENCY AND DUE DATES
Minimum Frequency Required Period Covered Due Dates
Quarterly (once every 3 months)
Request for Reimbursement ☐ Quarter 1: 7/1– 9/30
Quarter 2: 10/1 – 12/31
Quarter 3: 1/1– 3/31
Quarter 4: 4/1– 6/30
By October 31
st
By January 31st
By April 30th
By July 31st Alameda CTC Progress Report ☐
Semi-annually (once every 6 months)
Request for Reimbursement ☒ Quarters 1 & 2: 7/1 – 12/31 Quarters 3 & 4: 1/1 – 6/30
By January 31st
By July 31st Alameda CTC Progress Report ☒
Final Closeout Reporting
Final Request for Reimbursement ☒ Any work period eligible under Appendix B. By Agreement
Expiration Date
Alameda CTC Final Report ☒ Entire project period.

EXHIBIT A

Page 26 of 30 ends

64 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix D – Page 1

APPENDIX D

LOCAL BUSINESS CONTRACT EQUITY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
As noted in Section I.13, PROJECT SPONSOR is obligated to comply with all applicable provisions of the Alameda CTC Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program, incorporated herein by reference as if attached hereto.

LBCE Program Substitution: The LBCE Program allows substitution of Alameda CTC’s program if a Project Sponsor’s local preference program has been approved in writing by the Alameda CTC’s LBCE Liaison Officer. P
ROJECT SPONSOR shall obtain approval of any such substitution prior to the advertisement of any procurements potentially eligible for reimbursement under this AGREEMENT.

The following resources are available to guide Project Sponsors through the LBCE Program requirements for procurement and contracting processes:

• Sample template language for professional and construction services contracts is available from A
LAMEDA CTC’s website: https://www.alamedactc.org/get-involved/contract-equ ity

• Prime and Subconsultant/Subcontractor Local Business Enterprise, Small Local Business Enterprise and Very Small Local Business Enterprise Utilization Form: https://www.alamedactc.org/get- involved/contracting-forms/

• The LBCE Program Guidelines, available at the above link, includes a Project Sponsor Responsibility Checklist. Appendix B of the LBCE Program Guidelines identifies the Responsibilities of Sponsor Agencies.

• Direct inquiries about the LBCE Program to ALAMEDA CTC’s LBCE Liaison Officer:

Seung Cho
Director of Contract Services and Operations
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (510) 208-7472

EXHIBIT A

Page 27 of 30 ends

65 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix E - Page 1

APPENDIX E

DELIVERABLES AND DUE DATES
Project Deliverables and Due Dates: The Deliverables and Due Dates tables below reflect required deliverables and due dates, if any, for the phases listed in Appendix A-2 Project Phase Descriptions that contain ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

Additionally, PROJECT SPONSOR must also submit Request for Reimbursement forms and Progress Reporting as required per Appendix C.

Deliverables and Due Dates
No. Description Due Date to
Alameda CTC
Construction
1 Progress Reports
(See Appendix C: Request for Reimbursements and Reporting Requirements) Per Appendix C
2 Photos of temporary construction signage (which includes the Alameda CTC logo and/or the Air District logo for TFCA funded projects). 07/31/26
3 Before and After photos of construction completion.

By the Agreement
Expiration Date 4 Confirmation of construction completion.

Ex. Copy of governing board acceptance, notice of completion or similar.

Final Closeout Deliverables
5 Documentation of completed publicity requirements per Section I.20.

Ex. Funding agency credit/logo usage on websites, articles, and construction signage. By the Agreement Expiration Date 6 Final Invoice
7 Final Report
Note:
• Per Section III.12 of AGREEMENT, Alameda CTC may withhold payment of reimbursement requests until past due deliverables are received and approved.

EXHIBIT A

Page 28 of 30 ends

66 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix F – Page 1

APPENDIX F

PROJECT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Project Performance Measures: The Project Performance Measures and Targets describes what outcome- based performance measure(s) the PROJECT SPONSOR plans to evaluate to ensure that the project/program is meeting its objectives.

Appendix F is Not Applicable.

EXHIBIT A

Page 29 of 30 ends

67 Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0047
Project No. 1649000
Appendix G – Page 1

APPENDIX G

TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS

The contents of Appendix G are only included and attached to this AGREEMENT if TFCA funds are obligated and applicable to AGREEMENT.

Appendix Index

Appendix G-1 TFCA Project Number and “Years of Effectiveness” Appendix G-2 TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies and Insurance Requirements Appendix G-3 Air District TFCA Logos

EXHIBIT A

Page 30 of 30 ends

68 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 6.4

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:

Resolutions authorizing execution of a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and authorizing, subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund 621 in the FY 2025-26 budget and execution of an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026, to provide engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Staff recommends the City Council adopt two resolutions:
1 .

Authorizing the City Manager to execute a cooperation agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not-to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and
2 .

A
uthorizing, subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund (Fund 621) in the FY 2025-26 budget.
3 .

Authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026, to provide engineering analysis and prepare a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
On November 8, 2022, Livermore voters approved amendments to the City’s South Livermore Valley 69 Urban Growth Boundary Initiative (Measure P). These amendments allow the extension of sewer services to the northeast portion of the South Livermore Valley in unincorporated Alameda County along Buena Vista Avenue and segments of Tesla Road and Greenville Road (Attachment 1).

The City of Livermore (City) and County of Alameda (County) staff have developed a cooperation agreement that allows the County to fund and the City to manage an engineering consultant to provide topographic surveys, perform preliminary engineering analysis and develop a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension. This report will include recommended sewer main alignment and depth, locations (if any) where pump or lift stations would be needed and preliminary cost estimates for the project’s construction, operation, maintenance and revenue.

Carollo Engineers, Inc. submitted a proposal that meets the City and County's requirements for qualifications and scope of work. This agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc., in an amount not-to- exceed $629,000, will provide the information needed prior to beginning final design work and will inform ongoing discussions with Alameda County regarding project implementation, funding, asset ownership, operations, and maintenance.

DISCUSSION
On July 11, 2022, the City Council adopted the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and authorized amendments to the City’s South Livermore Valley Urban Growth Boundary Initiative, to address groundwater concerns and allow for continued commercial and visitor serving developments in this area of unincorporated Alameda County.

This action was requested by the Tri-Valley Conservancy and other South Livermore Valley stakeholders in response to Zone 7's Nutrient Management Plan for the Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin (July 2015), and the Alameda County Local Agency Management Program for septic systems (June 2018), which both identify areas of concern regarding nitrate concentrations and describe requirements, procedures, prohibitions, and corrective actions including connection to a municipal sewer system.

On November 8, 2022, Livermore voters approved amendments to the City’s South Livermore Valley Urban Growth Boundary Initiative (Measure P). These amendments allow the extension of sewer services to the northeast portion of the South Livermore Valley in unincorporated Alameda County along Buena Vista Avenue and segments of Tesla Road and Greenville Road. The location of the proposed sewer extension is generally shown on Attachment 1 and would connect to the existing City sewer main on East Avenue at Buena Vista Avenue. The new sewer main would provide adjacent Alameda County residents and businesses the opportunity to connect to sewer service.

City and Alameda County staff have developed a Cooperation Agreement (Exhibit A to the Cooperation Agreement Resolution) allowing the County to provide funding and the City to utilize the County funding to provide project management services and contract with an engineering consultant with expertise in sewer systems. The consultant will obtain topographic surveys, perform engineering analysis and develop a basis of design report. This report will include recommended sewer main alignment and depth, locations (if any) where pump or lift stations would be needed and preliminary cost estimates for the project’s construction, operation, maintenance and revenue. This information is needed prior to beginning final design work and will inform ongoing discussions with Alameda County regarding project implementation, funding, asset ownership, operations, maintenance, and other issues related to the sewer extension.

70 In May 2024, staff sent out a request for qualifications for consultants to perform engineering services for utility projects, including water and wastewater projects, associated with the City’s Capital Improvement Program. The purpose of this process was to receive statements of qualifications (SOQs) from multiple consultants, and based on review of these qualifications, execute on-call utility engineering services agreements and establish a short list of consultants who would be eligible for supporting future utility projects. Based on review of the SOQs including qualifications, interest, and coverage, a selection committee comprised of staff from Engineering and Water Resources found Carollo to be the top-ranked consultant for utility engineering services with a wastewater emphasis.

In December 2024, staff solicited proposals from three engineering firms on the prequalified list of utility engineering consultants for engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project, including land survey, engineering analysis to produce a basis of design report that will include project design recommendations, estimates of capital, operating and maintenance costs, and revenue.

Carollo Engineers submitted a proposal that was reviewed and approved by City and County staff.

Carollo Engineers have satisfactorily completed work on other projects for the City. A professional services agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Exhibit A to the Professional Services Agreement Resolution) is recommended for approval subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement, which the County will consider subsequent to the City's approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

On July 11, 2022, the City adopted the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). No additional environmental review is required for this action.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS

At this time, funding for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project is limited to $6.5 million set aside by Alameda County. This funding is sufficient for this action.

To proceed with the Project, staff proposes a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund (Fund 621) in the FY 2025-26 budget for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313 subject to Alameda County approving the cooperation agreement. Alameda County will reimburse the City for the preliminary design phase expenses and $71,000 for City staff costs to provide project management.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

2: Economy That Prospers

GOAL

2: Lead efforts, in collaboration with other City departments and outside partners, to maintain and enhance the diversity and resilience of Livermore's economy.

GUIDING DOCUMENT

Fiscal Year 2025-2030 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan

71 ATTACHMENTS

1. Project Location

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Alameda County Cooperation Agreement

4. Resolution

5. Exhibit A - Carollo Professional Services Agreement

Prepared by: Farnoush Levers
Assistant City Engineer

Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
72 Map Source: https://www.acgov.org/cda/planning/landuseprojects/documents/SLVAP_Boundary.pdf Project
ATTACHMENT 1
73 1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A COOPERATION

AGREEMENT WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY TO REIMBURSE THE CITY
WITH COUNTY FUNDING IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $700,000

AND AUTHORIZING, SUBJECT TO ALAMEDA COUNTY APPROVING

THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT, A SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATION OF $700,000 IN ALAMEDA COUNTY FUNDING TO
THE CIP WASTEWATER FUND (FUND 621) IN THE FISCAL YEAR
2025-26 BUDGET FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING

SERVICES FOR THE SOUTH LIVERMORE VALLEY SEWER
EXTENSION PROJECT WW202313

The City of Livermore and Alameda County desire to retain a project manager and to obtain topographic survey and engineering analysis to help develop a cost - effective basis of design report (“BOD Report”) for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project to include recommended pipe alignment and depth, locations (if any) where pump or lift stations would be needed , and preliminary cost -estimates for construction, operation, and maintenance.

The City of Livermore desires to enter into this Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) with Alameda County to reimburse the City with County funding for project management and engineering services for the project.

This Agreement specifies the method of cooperation between the City and County, which includes terms and conditions under which the C ity will provide project management, surveying, engineering analysis, and preparation of the BOD Report for the Project . The C ounty will reimburse the City for reasonable and necessary cos ts incurred by the C ity for these services, which is estimated to be , and not exceeding $700,000, and includes consultant fees, C ity project management costs, and contingency.

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that it hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager to execute a Cooperation Agreement with Alameda County, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to reimburse the City with County funding in an amount not -to-exceed $700,000 for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

2. Authorizes, subject to Alameda County approving the Cooperation Agreement, a supplemental appropriation of $700,000 in Alameda County funding to the CIP Wastewater Fund (Fund 621) in the FY 2025-26 budget.

74 2 RESOLUTION NO. ________

3. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council M ember ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Deborah L. Elam Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Senior Assistant City Attorney

Exhibit A – Cooperation Agreement with Alameda County
75 COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR

DEVELOPMENT OF A BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT AND RELATED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE SOUTH LIVERMORE

VALLEY SEWER EXTENSION PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of _______ _ 2025, by and between the County of Alameda , "COUNTY" and the City of Livermore, a municipal corporation of the State of California, "CI1Y", collectively the "Parties".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the area depicted in Exhibit A is in the unincorporated area of the COUNTY and is known as the South Livermore Valley. The South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project ("Project ") is situated in the northeast portion of the South Livermore Valley, as shown in Exhibit A.

WHEREAS, the South Livermore Valley is beyond the CI1Y's municipal and urban growth boundaries .

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, the CI1Y adopted the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project ("Project ") Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and authorized amendments to the City's South Livermore Valley Urban Growth Boundary Initiative, to address groundwater concerns and allow for continued commercial and visitor serving development in the unincorporated area of COUNTY.

WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Livermore voters approved amendments to the City's South Livermore Valley Urban Growth Boundary Initiative (Measure P).

WHEREAS, The location of the Project is generally shown by red and blue lines on Exhibit B.

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to retain a project manager and to obtain topographic survey and engineering analysis to help develop a cost-effective basis of design report ("BOD Report ") for the Project to include recommended pipe alignment and depth , locations (if any) where pump or lift stations would be needed and preliminary cost estimates for the Project's construction, operation , and maintenance.

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Cooperation Agreement ("Agreement ") for project management , surveying , engineering analysis , and preparation of the BOD Report for the Project. The scope for this work is shown in Exhibit C-1 and Exhibit C-2.

WHEREAS, this Agreement specifies the method of cooperation between the Parties which includes terms and conditions under which the CI1Y will provide project management , surveying , engineering analysis, and preparation of the BOD Report for the Project and the COUNTY will reimburse the City for reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the CI1Y for these services, which is estimated to be and not exceeding

EXHIBIT A

Page 1 of 19 ends

76 $700.000 and includes consultant fees, CI1Y project management costs, and contingency.

WHEREAS, there will be strict accountability by the City of all funds transacted and a report of all receipts and distributions shall be made upon request by the County and at the conclusion of the preparation of the BOD Report. CI1Y shall provide a report to COUN1Y documenting all expenditures made by CI1Y for project management and BOD Report.

WHEREAS, the COUN1Y and CI1Y desire to specify the terms and conditions under which the BOD Report shall be provided.

WHEREAS, this Agreement does not address issues including final design , bid documents , construction , ownership and maintenance, flow and strength monitoring of the added sewage to be conveyed by the Project , costs to connect the Project and discharge to the CI1Y's existing sewer system, and for treatment at the CI1Y's Water Reclamation Plant.

WHEREAS, this Agreement does not obligate the CI1Y or the COUN1Y to perform any work on the Project subsequent to the BOD Report including but not limited to annexation or connection of properties, design, real property acquisition, permitting, construction , operation or maintenance or the costs thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, the COUN1Y and CI1Y agree as follows:

SECTION I: CI1Y COVENANTS
CI1Y AGREES TO:

A. Complete the scope of work to develop the BOD Report as outlined in Exhibit C-1.

CI1Y will contract with an engineering consultant that specializes in sewer design and operation for this work.

B. Provide project management services as outlined in Exhibit C-2.

C. Manage the procurement of any goods or services required under this Agreement based on a competitive bidding process and comply with all requirements applicable to "public works ," including , without limitation , those contained in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I of the California Labor Code (Section 1720, et seq.).

D. Ensure that any consultants performing project management , design, and administrative services in connection with the Project secure and maintain in full force and effect, general liability, workers compensation, and auto liability insurance in forms and limits ofliability acceptable to CI1Y and COUN1Y, which insurance names CI1Y and COUN1Y and their officers, employees, and agents as an additional insured from and against all damages , claims, loss, liability , and cost or expense arising out of or in any way connected with the Improvements. 2 EXHIBIT A

Page 2 of 19 ends

77 E. Complete the BOD Report within seven months of the date that CITY issues a notice to proceed to the consultant.

F. Maintain cost accounting for the work outlined in this Agreement.

SECTION II: COUNTY COVENANTS
COUNTY AGREES TO:

A. Reimburse CITY for up to $700,000 within 30 days of the receipt of an invoice for authorized costs incurred by CITY pursuant to this Agreement. This funding will pay up to $569,094 for consultant fees, $71,000 for CITY project management, and reserve $59,906 as a contingency.

B. Coordinate with CITY during preparation of the BOD Report, including reviewing draft analysis and reports, and attending project development team meetings, as needed.

SECTION III: INDEMNITY
A. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, COUNTY shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend with counsel selected by COUNTY and reasonably acceptable to CITY, the CITY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney's fees and costs and fees oflitigation) (collectively, "Liability") arising out of or in connection with COUNTY's performance of services contemplated by this Agreement, or in connection with COUNfY's failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY or its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, and agents. COUNTY's obligations to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend shall not be excused because of COUNTY's inability to evaluate Liability or because COUNTY evaluates Liability and determines that COUNTY is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

COUNTY will endeavor to respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by CITY.
1) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a "construction contract" covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then COUNTY's duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
3 EXHIBIT A

Page 3 of 19 ends

78 2) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for "design professional services" defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, then COUNTY's duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a), unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

B. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CI'IY shall hold harmless, indemnify , and defend with counsel selected by CI'IY and reasonably acceptable to the COUNTY, the COUNTY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors , employees, and agents from and against any and all liability , loss, damage, claims, expenses , and costs (including without limitation , attorney 's fees and costs and fees oflitigation) (collectively, "Liability") arising out of or in connection with CI'IY's performance of services contemplated by this Agreement , or in connection with CI'IY's failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement , except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of County or its elected officials, officers, directors, employees, and agents. CI'IY's obligations to hold harmless , indemnify , and defend shall not be excused because of CI'IY's inability to evaluate Liability or because CI'IY evaluates Liability and determines that CI'IY is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement . CI'IY will endeavor to respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by COUNIY.
1) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a "construction contract " covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then CI'IY's duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
2) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for "design professional services" defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8 , then CI'IY's duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a) , unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

C. Risk Management Procedure/Insurance: Promptl y upon receipt of any third-party claim or potential legal action concerning this Agreement , the receiving party will notify the other party in writing and provide copies of all relevant information, including the claim, if any.
4 EXHIBIT A

Page 4 of 19 ends

79 In no event may a party to this Agreement prejudice the rights of the other party or settle a claim on behalf of the other party. If the alleged or actual responsibility for a claim is shared by both parties, or the alleged or actual responsible party is uncertain, the parties to this Agreement shall meet and confer to determine how to handle the claim. The parties shall meet and confer via teleconference within thirty (30) calendar days after the claim is presented to the non-receiving party. Failure of the parties to meet and confer within said thirty (30) calendar days does not entitle the parties to settle the claim on behalf of the other party.

This Section III, in its entirety, shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

SECTION IV: MISCELLANEOUS
IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED:

A. Termination. That this Agreement shall terminate upon completion of the project management and BOD Report phase of the Project.

B. Amendments. That if, during the term of this Agreement it becomes necessary to amend or add to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, any such amendment or addition shall not be binding unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both Parties.

C. Entire Agreement. This instrument, including any attachments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and correctly sets forth the rights, duties, and obligations of each party to the other.

D. Partial Invalidity. If any provision or portion of this Agreement shall be deemed invalid, it is agreed that such invalidity shall affect only such provision or portion thereof, and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in force and effect.

E. California Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

F. Headings. The headings used in this Agreement are intended for reference only and do not define or limit the scope or meaning of any provision of this Agreement.

G. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or conditions in this Agreement, no matter how long the failure continues, is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequently demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the non breaching party.
5 EXHIBIT A

Page 5 of 19 ends

80 H. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email, or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals and shall be valid and effective for all purposes.

I. Attachments. All attachments referred to in and attached to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.

J. Notices. Any written notice required by this Agreement shall be sent by first-class mail, to the Parties at the addresses set forth below or to such substitute address as may by designated by written notice to the other party:

City of Livermore
Director of Community Development
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
County of Alameda
Director Community Development Agency
224 W. Winton Ave, Rm. no
Hayward, CA 94544
6 EXHIBIT A

Page 6 of 19 ends

81 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement, the day, month, and year set forth opposite their respective signatures.

CITY OF LIVERMORE
A Municipal Corporation
By:--------
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Date: ________ _
ATTESTED:

By: _________ _
Debbie L. Elam
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:T~ a~· rt
Senior Assistant City Attorney

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
By:--------
David Haubert, President
Board of Supervisors
Date: _________ _
ATTESTED BY:

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:---------
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Donna R. Ziegler, County Counsel
By:---------
Andrea L. Weddle
Chief Assistant County Counsel
By signing above, signatory warrants and represents that they executed this Agreement in their authorized capacity and that by their signature on this Agreement they, or the entity upon behalf of which he/ she acted. executed this Agreement.

Attachments: Exhibit A South Livermore Valley Map
Exhibit B Conceptual Project Alignment
Exhibit C-1 BOD Report Scope and Budget
Exhibit C-2 Project Management Scope and Budget
7 EXHIBIT A

Page 7 of 19 ends

82 Exhibit A
i i I ~-"- I ol ! / ~
9 South Livermore Valley Area Plan
" ' l t\ I ~ / f ~
j" I • I 1ll t/ L. ~ .. , I ~l .; l'

1. '. _ -- ~ .-::'.'.'.'.'_".':~--- im, ,, ... .Ti! •
I
: ...
!
,♦• =
I ♦♦ l
: '•, : I •, • : •,, j
• '°• I - ~ ... '\--
" .l ~
.. \

11. •••• .r"'
I
L
+
Map Source: https://www.acgov.org /cda/planning/landuseprojects/documents/SLVAP _Boundary.pdf Project
t
+-
---::....-.:::=--- ~ I ·-··- I '

EXHIBIT A

Page 8 of 19 ends

83 Exhibit B - Project Location
Legend:

Red - City Proposed Alignment
Blue - County Addition to Proposed Alignment

EXHIBIT A

Page 9 of 19 ends

84 CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

SCOPE OF WORK
9/11/2025
EXHIBIT C-1
The following scope describes all work anticipated to be provided by Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) during the Basis Of Design Phase of the Livermore Sewer Extension Project.

It is assumed that the project includes the following.
• Connecting to the existing 12-inch sewer in East Avenue at Buena Vista Avenue • Extending south along Buena Vista Avenue
• Then east along Tesla Road to Greenville Road
• And then south along Greenville Road to the entrance of JMC Cellars. • As a design alternate, the County has also requested consideration of extending the sewer north along Greenville Road from Tesla Road to the Martinelli Center.

Task 1.0 - Project Management and Meetings
Task 1.1- Project Management : Consultant shall perform project management necessary to plan, execute, monitor, and report the project's progress to the City over an estimated 6-month period.

Consultant shall prepare a monthly progress letter report for attachment to the monthly invoice to track and report status of budget expenditures and key work products completed during the billing period .

Consultant shall maintain a Decision Log to track the impact of decisions made on design, consulting cost, construction cost, and project schedule .

Task 1.2 - Meetings: Consultant will attend and conduct the following meetings with the City:
• Kick-Off Meeting - Consultant will conduct a meeting to review the project goals, scope, schedule, deliverables, and information requests by Consultant. It is assumed that 4 Consultant team members will attend and the in-person meeting will be 2 hours in duration. • PM Progress Meetings - Consultant will conduct 10 meetings to discuss overall work progress and the status of near-term efforts and requirements. It is assumed that 2 Consultant team members will attend and the virtual meetings will be one hour in duration.

For each meeting, Consultant will prepare meeting agenda, meeting presentation materials, and meeting minutes to document key discussion issues, action items, and decisions made.

Information and/or Services Provided by City for Task 1.0:
• Input at meetings.
• Responses to information requests.

Page 1 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 10 of 19 ends

85 EXHIBIT C-1
Consultant Deliverables for Task 1.0:
• Updated project design schedule at each design deliverable milestone. • Meeting agenda, presentation materials, and meeting minutes. • Progress letter report with each monthly invoice .

Task 2.0 - Basis of Design
The Basis of Design phase will address several questions that will need to be solved prior to the start of design to set the project off on the right foot. Having answers to these questions will be necessary to avoid inefficiencies and rework during design and problems post construction.

These questions include but are not limited to the following:
• Evaluating the cost of connection vs continued operation of septic systems. • · Look for ways to make connecting to the new sewer more financially feasible for property owners (gravity vs grinder pump).
• Identifying when customers will connect.
• Define flows and loads.
• Identifying impacts to the City's WRP.
• Confirm extended sewer collection system routing and alignment. • Select pipe sizes and material.

Task 2.1- Utility Investigations: Consultant's Surveyor (LCC) will survey the proposed alignment. LCC will establish survey control, provide aerial survey, and conduct supplemental ground surveys and mapping .

Work will also include locating and dipping existing septic tanks and clean outs . Existing utility research and right of way mapping have not been included in this scope but should be completed during preliminary design.

Consultant's Geotechnical Subconsultant (Crawford) will perform two geotechnical borings to a depth of 30-feet at the canal crossing location to validate the crossing method. Crawford will also provide information to assist in the BDR. Crawford will complete the following:
• Review available geologic and fault mapping;
• Review available groundwater data;
• Review existing geotechnical data including nearby Crawford sites; • Review USDA Web Soil Survey;
• Prepare a Preliminary Geotechnical Memo (Desktop Study) including project and site description; soil and groundwater conditions; key geotechnical considerations; seismic consideration including liquefaction potential, fault rupture, seismic settlement; preliminary grading recommendations including use of onsite material for backfill, potential for dewatering, etc; boring logs; existing exploration locations; and geologic and fault map. The Memo will include a figure that shows the AP Zone and potential areas for liquefaction in the vicinity of the alignment .

Page 2 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 11 of 19 ends

86 EXHIBIT C-1

2.1 Assumptions:
• 4 days are provided as an allowance for dipping existing septic tanks and this task will be completed in consecutive working days.
• The City or County will contact property owners and send notifications in advance, coordinating access to the private properties, as necessary for LCC to perform the survey. • The City or County will have a representative on site and accompany LCC while on private property.
• Only readily accessible septic tanks will be surveyed.

Task 2.2 - BOD Workshops: Consultant will hold up to two, two-hour workshops to work through assumptions and present findings to the City. These workshops will be held as a hybrid meeting so necessary team members may attend . One of the workshops will be used to review the draft BOOR.

Task 2.3 - Simulate Updated Flows and Loading: Consultant shall evaluate the anticipated impacts to the City's existing Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) treatment capacity. Hydraulic, biological, and solids loading will be estimated for the extended sewer collection system and compared to the existing capacities at the WRP. Potential mitigation measures and/or capacity improvements will be identified with estimated implementation costs. Information for this task will be taken from the HydroScience Report.

Task 2.4 - Cost Evaluations: Consultant shall estimate construction costs and the cost to operate and maintain the added infrastructure . Consultant shall prepare a spreadsheet model to estimate revenue from connection fees and monthly service charges for the various land uses likely to connect to the new sewer. Consultant shall prepare short, mid and long-range revenue forecasts and identify potential operating deficits . Operating costs evaluated will be evaluated for the pumpstation . It is assumed that routine maintenance costs will be provided by the city based on their existing sewer maintenance program. The City will also provide connection fee and usage rate information for the evaluation .

Consultant shall analyze and compare a deep gravity line alternative with a lift station alternative for the reach on Tesla Road near Vasco Road. Analysis shall include lifecycle cost estimates for each alternative (permitting , right of way, construction, operation, maintenance, rehabilitation and capital replacement costs). Discuss pros and cons of alternatives addressing issues such as new connections and ease of maintenance .

Task 2.5 - BOOR: The BOOR will summarize all findings under this task and provide recommendations on the following :
• Confirm extended sewer routing and alignment
• Discharges to the extended sewer collection system compared to ongoing use of septic systems and land application
• Sewer conveyance solely via gravity pipelines compared to use of a lift station • Design criteria including pipe material, size, slope, connection type, and capacity • Proposed lift station location and capacity of equipment

Page 3 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 12 of 19 ends

87 EXHIBIT C-1
Information and/or Services Provided by City for Task 2.0:
• Provide the anticipated flows based on connection type . (Information will be from the HydroScience Report and confirmed by the City)
• Provide wastewater flows and loads information from the wineries if different than the HydroScience Report.
• Provide access to properties for survey of septic systems and clean outs . • Input at meetings .
• Responses to information requests.

Consultant Deliverables for Task 2.0:
• Meeting agenda, presentation materials, and meeting minutes. • Topographic survey of the proposed alignment and spot elevations for septic tanks . • Two geotechnical bore hole bore logs for the canal crossing. • Evaluate data provided by the City and present the findings. • Hold up to two, two-hour workshops to work through assumptions and present findings to the City.
• Draft and Final BOOR
o Define design criteria.
o List regulatory, permitting, and right of way requirements.

Assumptions
• Carollo will assist the City in making decisions but the information will generally need to be provided by the City. No testing or public information gathering has been included at this time . • The project does not need a rate study and sewer rates will follow the current City rate schedule . • No permit fees have been included in our budget and will be paid by the City or County. • The City and County will assist in providing access to the Canal for survey of inverts. • Schedule is subject to change based on availability at time of NTP Task 3.0 - As-Directed Services
Upon request by the City, Carollo shall provide as-directed services to the City. A budget allowance of $59,906 has been included. Any use of this budget allowance shall require written authorization from the City that includes the scope of as-directed services and an agreed upon not-to-exceed limit. As directed services could include the following :
• Payment of Fees, including permit fees
• Additional geotechnical and surveying services
• Attendance of meetings beyond those described above
• Public outreach
• Design related services

Page 4 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 13 of 19 ends

88 EXHIBIT C-1
Preliminary Schedule
Survey Four weeks from NTP
Geotechnical Boring Six weeks from NTP
Preliminary Findings Workshop Twelve weeks from NTP

Page 5 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 14 of 19 ends

89 TASK

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025 SP
QA/QC
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule $378
Column 1
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 0

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings ) 0
Task 1 Total Hours 0
Task 1 Total Budget $0
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey , Geotech , Utility Research ) 0

2.2 BOD Workshops 0

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScien ce Report) 0

2.4 Cost Evaluations 0

2.5 BODR 5
Task 2 Total Hours 5
Task 2 Total Budget $1,890
TASK 3 • As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services 5
Task 3 Total Hours 5
Task 3 Total Budget $1,890
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours 10
Tasks 1-3 Total Budaet $3,780
LPP
Principal-
in-Charge
$299
2 3
10 13
$3,887
0 10
20 0
0 30
$8,970
40 40
$11 ,960
83 I $24,817 I
EXHIBIT C-1

SP LPP SP LPP
Project Project Senior Structural
Manager Engineer Professional Engineer
$378 $350 $378 $350
3 4 6 7
90 0 0 0
20 20 4 2
110 20 4 2
$41,580 $7,000 $1,512 $700
4 8 0 0
20 40 10 0
0 0 150 0
20 60 5 0
40 80 20 0
84 188 185 0
$31 ,752 $65,800 $69,930 $0
40 40 40 5
40 40 40 5
$15,120 $14,000 $15,120 $1,750
234 248 229 7
$88,452 I $86,800 I $86,562 I $2,450
1 of4

EXHIBIT A

Page 15 of 19 ends

90 TASK

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025 SP
EPIC
Engineer
July 2025 • June 2026 Fee Schedule $378
Column !l
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 0

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings) 0
Task 1 Total Hours 0
Task 1 Total Budget $0
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech, Utility Research) 0

2.2 BOD Workshops 10

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScience Report) 0

2.4 Cost Evaluations 0

2.5 BOOR 30
Task 2 Total Hours 40
Task 2 Total Budget $15,120
TASK 3 - As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services
Task 3 Total Hours 0
Task 3 Total Budget $0
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours 40
Tasks 1-3 Total Budaet $15,120
pp
EPIC
Engineer
$324
9 0
0 0
$0
0 0
0 0
20 20
$6,480
0 $0
20 I $6,480 I
EXHIBIT C-1

LP AP ST
Project Civil Staff CAD
Services Engineer Engineer Technician
$205 $299 $232 $239
11 12 13 14
12 0 0 0
0 10 0 0
12 10 0 0
$2,460 $2,990 $0 $0
0 24 0 30
0 50 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 50 0 0
0 200 36 100
0 324 36 130
$0 $96,876 $8,352 $31,070
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
$0 $0 $0 $0
12 334 36 130
$2,460 I $99,866 I $8,352 I $31,070
2 of4

EXHIBIT A

Page 16 of 19 ends

91 TASK

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025 DP/C
Document
Processing
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule $166
Column l~
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 0

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings) 0
Task 1 Total Hours 0
Task 1 Total Budget $0
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech, Utility Research) 0

2.2 BOD Workshops 0

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScience Report) 2

2.4 Cost Evaluations 0

2.5 BOOR 10
Task 2 Total Hours 12
Task 2 Total Budget $1,992
TASK 3 -As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services 0
Task 3 Total Hours 0
Task 3 Total Budget $0
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours 12
Tasks 1-3 Total Budget $1,992
EXHIBIT C-1

SUBCONSUL TANTS OTHER DIRE
Sub-
consultant
Geotech Survey Subtotals Markup
lb 7/ li:S l~ zz ZJ
105 $37,377 $0 $0 $0 $0
66 $22,752 $0 $0 $0 $0
171
$60,129 $0 $0 $0 $0
66 $18,658 $27,099 $125,361 $152,460 $15,246
140 $47,060 $0 $0 $0 $0
172 $63,012 $0 $0 $0 $0
135 $45,400 $0 $0 $0 $0
541 $164,102 $0 $0 $0 $0
1054
$338,232 $27,099 $125,361 $152,460 $15,246
170 $59,840 $0 $0 $0 $0
170
$59,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 I
1395
I $458,201 $27,099 $125,361 $152,460 $15,246
3of4

EXHIBIT A

Page 17 of 19 ends

92 TASK
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management

1.2 Meetings (Kickoff & 10 Meetings)
TASK 2 - Basis of Design

CITY OF LIVERMORE

SOUTH LIVERMORE SEWER EXTENSION

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT

FEE ESTIMATE
9/11/2025
9/11/2025
July 2025 - June 2026 Fee Schedule
Column
Task 1 Total Hours
Task 1 Total Budget

2.1 Utility Investigations (Survey, Geotech , Utility Research)

2.2 BOD Workshops

2.3 Simulate Updated Flows and Loading (information gathered from HydroScience Report)

2.4 Cost Evaluations

2.5 BOOR
Task 2 Total Hours
Task 2 Total Budget
TASK 3 - As-Directed Services

3.1 As-Directed Services
Task 3 Total Hours
Task 3 Total Budget
Tasks 1-3 Total Hours
Tasks 1-3 Total Budget
EXHIBIT C-1

CT COSTS COST SUMMARY
Travel
$/mi
Total ODCs Total Cost
z:, Zb Z/
$0 $0 $37,377
$1 ,744 $1 ,744 $24,496
$1,744 $1,744 $61,873
$412 $168 ,118 $186,776
$412 $412 $47,472
$0 $0 $63,012
$0 $0 $45,400
$0 $0 $164,102
$1,282 $168,988 $507,220
$66 $66 $59,906
$66 $66 $59,906
$3,092 $170,799 $629,000
4 of4

EXHIBIT A

Page 18 of 19 ends

93 Exhibit C-2
Project Management Scope and Budget
• Coordinate all activities with County of Alameda staff as needed • Prepare agreement with consultant to prepare BOD Report • Seek City Council approval of consultant agreement
• Coordinate with consultant as needed
• Review consultant's deliverables
• Review and approve consultant's invoice for payment
• Coordinate with City of Livermore Finance Division to receive funding from County and to pay consultant's invoices
• Coordinate with various City of Livermore staff as needed • Prepare quarterly progress updates
• Prepare final invoice and project accounting
• Prepare and issue RFP for design
• Review proposals and rank design consultants
Project Management Budget - $71,000

EXHIBIT A

Page 19 of 19 ends

94 1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC., IN AN AMOUNT
NOT-TO-EXCEED $629,000 AND A TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31,
2026, TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND PREPARE A

BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FOR THE SOUTH LIVERMORE VALLEY
SEWER EXTENSION PROJECT WW202313

The City of Livermore approved a Cooperation Agreement with Alameda County to reimburse the City with up to $700,000 of County funding for project management and engineering services for the South Livermore Sewer Extension Project WW202313.

Alameda County will consider the Cooperation Agreement at a future Board of Supervisors meeting.

To advance the project, a topographic survey, engineering analysis , and basis of design report are needed.

This professional services a greement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. will provide a topographic survey, engineering analysis and basis of design report for the project.

Project expenses , including payments for work covered by th is professional services agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. , will be eligible for reimbursement from Alameda County.

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that it hereby:

1. Authorizes, subject to Alame da County approving the Cooperation Agreement to provide funding, the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineer s, Inc., in amount not -to-exceed $629,000 and a term ending December 31, 2026 , attached hereto as Exhibit A, to obtain topographic surveys, perform engineering analysis , and develop a basis of design report for the South Livermore Valley Sewer Extension Project WW202313; and

2. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council M ember______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

95 2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Deborah L. Elam Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Senior Assistant City Attorney

Exhibit A – Professional Services Agreement – Carollo
96 EXHIBIT A

Page 1 of 24 ends

97 EXHIBIT A

Page 2 of 24 ends

98 EXHIBIT A

Page 3 of 24 ends

99 EXHIBIT A

Page 4 of 24 ends

100

EXHIBIT A

Page 5 of 24 ends

101

EXHIBIT A

Page 6 of 24 ends

102

EXHIBIT A

Page 7 of 24 ends

103

EXHIBIT A

Page 8 of 24 ends

104

EXHIBIT A

Page 9 of 24 ends

105

EXHIBIT A

Page 10 of 24 ends

106

EXHIBIT A

Page 11 of 24 ends

107

EXHIBIT A

Page 12 of 24 ends

108

EXHIBIT A

Page 13 of 24 ends

109

EXHIBIT A

Page 14 of 24 ends

110

EXHIBIT A

Page 15 of 24 ends

111

EXHIBIT A

Page 16 of 24 ends

112

EXHIBIT A

Page 17 of 24 ends

113

EXHIBIT A

Page 18 of 24 ends

114

EXHIBIT A

Page 19 of 24 ends

115

EXHIBIT A

Page 20 of 24 ends

116

EXHIBIT A

Page 21 of 24 ends

117

EXHIBIT A

Page 22 of 24 ends

118

EXHIBIT A

Page 23 of 24 ends

119

EXHIBIT A

Page 24 of 24 ends

120

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 6.5

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT:

Resolution accepting the FY 2024-25 Year-End Budget Report, allocating the General Fund Surplus for various purposes, allocating surplus member contributions to Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD), appropriating additional budget to those funds that ended FY 2024-25 with expenditures in excess of budget, and appropriating additional budget in FY 2025-26

RECOMMENDED ACTION

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
The report summarizes the unaudited actual results of the financial activities from FY 2024-25, and details carryover of previously appropriated but unspent funds, and allocating excess General Fund resources to City's asset replacement and repair reserves as well as Internal Service Funds reserves for operations, Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) workers compensation fund reserves. The report also recommends approval of other supplemental appropriations for FY 2025-26 expenditures.

DISCUSSION
The year-end budget report for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is attached as Exhibit A to the resolution. The combined unaudited General Fund balance is
$58.0
million. Of that, $44.3 million are the operating
reserves equal to 30% of operating expenses consistent with the City’s General Fund Reserve Policy. As described in more detail in Exhibit A, staff recommends allocating the FY 2024-25 General Fund surplus 121
of $8.1 million to various purposes including various operating and capital reserves. Staff requests allocating excess member contributions to Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department to be contributed t o
the LPFD Worker’s Compensation Fund reserves ($644,628). Staff further requests supplemental budget appropriations of $682,246 from various funds to cover FY 2024-25 budget shortfalls. These allocations occur before the final audit to incorporate the allocations into the City’s balance sheet and Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR). Historically, the ending balances have not materially changed as a result of the audit. Finally, staff requests supplemental appropriations from four funds for FY 2025-26 expenditures totaling $571,001.

As noted above, this information is unaudited. The audited information will be included in the City’s ACFR and will be presented to the City Council once the City’s independent auditor has issued its opinion on the ACFR, which is expected to happen by December 31, 2025. If there are any differences in the financial information presented in this report and the ACFR because of the audit, those changes will be highlighted at the time the ACFR is presented to the Council for acceptance.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS

There is no direct fiscal impact in accepting the Year-end Budget Report for the year ended June 30, 2025. As described in Exhibit A, staff is recommending allocating $8.1 million of the General Fund surplus to various purposes,
allocating excess member contributions to LPFD workers comp funds ($644,628), recommending supplemental budget appropriations of $682,246 to cover FY 2024-25 budget
shortfalls and finally approve a supplemental appropriation of $571,001 across four funds for FY 2025-26 expenses.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

5: A City that Works

GOAL

17: Ensure effective use of public resources

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - FY 2024-25 Year-End Budget Report

Prepared by: Erik Peterson
Finance Manager

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 YEAR-END

BUDGET REPORT, ALLOCATING THE GENERAL FUND SURPLUS

FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES, ALLOCATING SURPLUS MEMBER

CONTRIBUTIONS TO LIVERMORE PLEASANTON FIRE

DEPARTMENT, APPRORPIATING ADDITIONAL BUDGET TO THOSE
FUNDS THAT ENDED FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 WITH EXPENDITURES

IN EXCESS OF BUDGET, AND APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL
BUDGET IN FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

The Administrative Services Department’s Finance Division prepared and submitted to the City Council for its review the year -end budget report for Fiscal Year 2024-25, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

The attached report states that the General Fund FY 2024-25 year-end surplus is estimated to be $8.1 million. Staff recomm ends allocating the estimated surplus as shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Summary of Allocations of FY 2024-25 General Fund Surplus FY 2025-26 Appropriations Amount
Contractual Services:

Carryforward Contract Encumbrances $1,533,088
Additional Human Services Grants Funding 200,000
One-time Network Upgrade (IT Fund) 250,000
Total FY 2025-26 Contractual Services Appropriations $1,983,088 Allocations to Reserves:

Facility Maintenance Reserves $600,000
Information Technology Reserves 600,000
Fleet Replacement Reserves 600,000
Capital Improvement Program Reserves 1,925,589
Unallocated Reserves for Future Operating Reserve
Requirements 2,357,327
Total Allocations to Reserves $6,082,916
Total Allocations $8,066,004
Total Estimated Surplus: $8,066,004

The attached report also shows surplus contributions to Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) of $644,628. Staff recommends allocating $644,628 to LPFD Worker’s comp fund as shown in table 2 below.
123
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________

Table 2: Surplus Contributions to LPFD
City of
Pleasanton
City of
Livermore
Total
Contributions
Workers Comp Reserves $322,314 $322,314 $644,628
Total Use of Surplus Contributions: $322,314 $322,314 $644,628 FY 2024-25

The attached report also shows other funds that have expenditures in excess of budget as shown in Table 3 below for which staff is recommending an appropriation of budget in the amount of $682,246 disbursed over the three funds listed.

Table 3. Appropriations to Cover Expenditures Over Budget Fund Fund Name
Amended
Budget
Unaudited
Actual
Expenses
Expended
over Budget
282 Host Community Impact Fee $587,735 $613,823 ($26,088) 283 City Street Sweeping Fee 529,186 537,577 (8,391) 311 Other LMD 2,832,395 3,480,162 (647,767) Totals: $3,949,316 $4,631,562 ($682,246)
FY 2024-25

Finally, the attached report includes the following four funds requesting supplemental appropriations necessary in FY 2025-26 as shown in Table 4 shown below.

Table 4. Appropriations requested for FY 2025-26
Fund Fund Name
Supplemental
Appropriation
600 Airport $300,000
620 Wastewater 79,538
640 Water 55,962
700 General Liability 135,501
Total: $571,001
FY 2025-26

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESO LVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that:

1. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 year-end Budget Report, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is accepted.
124
3 RESOLUTION NO. ________

2. The General Fund surplus, which is anticipated to be approximately $8.1 million, be allocated as shown in Table 1 below:

Table 1. Summary of Allocations of FY 2024-25 General Fund Surplus FY 2025-26 Appropriations Amount
Contractual Services:

3. The surplus contributions by City of Livermore to Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) of $644,628 be allocated to LPFD Worker’s Comp Fund as shown in table 2 below and

4. Funds in Table 3 below receive supplemental appropriations of $682,246 to cover expenditures that are over budget and

125
4 RESOLUTION NO. ________
Table 3. Appropriations to Cover Expenditures Over Budget Fund Fund Name
Amended
Budget
Unaudited
Actual
Expenses
Expended
over Budget
282 Host Community Impact Fee $587,735 $613,823 ($26,088) 283 City Street Sweeping Fee 529,186 537,577 (8,391) 311 Other LMD 2,832,395 3,480,162 (647,767) Totals: $3,949,316 $4,631,562 ($682,246)
FY 2024-25

5. Funds in Table 4 below receive supplemental appropriations for spending in FY 2025-26.

On motion of Council M ember ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Kimberly Cilley
Deborah L. Elam Kimberly Cilley
City Clerk City Attorney

Exhibit A – FY 2024-25 Year End Budget Report
126
1 City of Livermore
FY 2024-25 Year End Budget Report
S
UMMARY
This report presents the results of operations from the FY 2024-25 Budget (Budget) and recommends allocations of the General Fund surplus as well as other budget adjustments. This information is unaudited. The audited information will be included in the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and will be presented to the City Council once the City’s independent auditor has issued its opinion on the ACFR, which is expected to happen by December 31, 2025. If there are any differences in the financial information presented in this report and the ACFR, those changes will be highlighted at the time the ACFR is presented to the Council for acceptance.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Staff’s recommendations include ratification of Council’s actions since the last approved budget adjustment (on June 9, 2025), allocating the General Fund surplus to various purposes as outlined in this report, increasing appropriations in various funds to cover shortfalls, and appropriating funding in the FY 2025-26 budget for a couple of items that were not included in the original FY 2025-26 budget. The combined unaudited General Fund balance is $58.0 million. Of that, $44.3 million are the operating reserves equal to 30% of budgeted operating expenses consistent with the City’s General Fund Reserve Policy. In addition, as described in more detail below, staff is recommending allocating the $8.1 million FY 2024-25 General Fund operating surplus to future purposes identified in Table 2. These allocations occur before the final audit to incorporate the amounts and purpose into the City’s balance sheet and ACFR.

Historically, the ending balances have not materially changed because of the audit.

BACKGROUND
The year-end financial report (Report) summarizes the actual results of FY 2024-25 financial activities and details changes in reserves. The City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) is still in progress; therefore, the financial information included in this Report is based on unaudited figures. The audited information will be included in the ACFR once the City's independent auditor has issued its opinion. Any changes to the information presented in this Report because of the audit will be brought to the City Council at that time.

DISCUSSION
The following discussion addresses the General Fund followed by a summary of all other funds.

General Fund
As shown in Table 1, FY 2024-25 actual revenues were greater than the budget by $3.1 million or 2%. Transfers in/out (net transfers) were $511.7 thousand or 2.9% greater than the projected budget and operating expenditures were $5.5 million or 3.9% less than the projected budget.

Overall, inflows of cash exceeded outflows of cash by $8.1 million. The net result is an operating surplus of $8.1 million. A detailed explanation of these variances is included in Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 in this Report.

EXHIBIT A
127
2 Estimated General Fund Surplus: Table 1 above shows the sources and uses for the General Fund. At the end of FY 2024-25, the unaudited numbers show an estimated surplus of approximately $8.1 million - actual revenues less expenses.

As described in Table 2 below, staff is recommending allocating the anticipated surplus of $8.1 million to various contractual services ($2.0 million), various internal services funds ($1.8 million), the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Reserve to be available for future capital projects ($1.9 million), and the Unallocated Reserves for future operating reserve requirements ($2.4 million). The $2.0 million for contractual services includes (1) carryforward contract encumbrances ($1.5 million), (2) additional contribution for Human Services grants ($100,000) for each year of the FY 2025-27 two-year budget, and (3) a one-time citywide network upgrade in the Information Technology Fund ($250,000).

Revised
Budget
Unaudited
Actual Variance
Revenues $148,800,148 $151,882,919 $3,082,771
Use of Fund Balance for
Carryforward Contracts and one-
time Police Wage Increase
2,484,100 2,484,100
Use of FY 2023-24 Surplus 10,081,678 10,081,678
OPEB Trust withdrawl 419,000 419,000
Net Transfers (17,788,421) (18,300,168) (511,747) Operating Expenditures ($141,132,420) ($135,637,440) 5,494,980 Operating Surplus (Deficit) $2,864,085 $10,930,089 $8,066,004 Addition to Operating Reserves ($2,864,085) ($2,864,085) Total $0 $8,066,004 $8,066,004
Table 1. General Fund Revised Budget to Actual
Revenues, Expenditures, and Transfers
General Fund
FY 2024-25

EXHIBIT A
128
3 General Fund Revenues: As described in Table 3 below, General Fund actual revenues were greater than the amended budget by $3.1 million or 2.1%. Table 3 presents the major revenue categories with a comparison of the projected budget versus actual revenues and the variance between the two. The following describes the significant variances.

Property Tax revenues are the General Fund’s largest revenue source, accounting for approximately 39.9% of total actual revenues. In FY 2024-25 actual property tax collections including all categories of property related taxes were $106,252 greater than the projected amount of $60.6 million.

Sales and Use Tax revenue is the General Fund’s second largest revenue source, accounting for approximately 25.7% of the total actual revenues. FY 2024-25 actual sales and use tax revenue was $3.5 million or 8.2% less than projected amount of $42.6 million due to relatively reduced sales tax receipts compared to FY 2023-24. The shortfall is due to (1) Costco’s new store opening in Pleasanton drawing sales from Livermore (2) fluctuations in Gillig’s sales (3) high interest rates tampering larger purchases such as vehicles, and (4) reduced confidence in the economy.

Business License Tax revenue decreased by $623,915 from the budget of $10.5 million likely due to reduced compliance efforts. In FY 2023-24 the City entered a new contract with Neumo (previously called Avenu Insights & Analytics) to handle the City’s business license renewals processing and compliance research. The initial year and transition happened extremely quick due to timing of the contract and renewal schedule. The second season of renewals occurred in Table 2. Summary of Allocations of FY 2024-25 General Fund Surplus FY 2025-26 Appropriations Amount
Contractual Services:

EXHIBIT A
129
4 FY 2024-25 which Neumo was mainly focused on business license renewals. Neumo is now beginning their compliance review to ensure all businesses in Livermore pay their respective business license tax. Approximately 800 businesses have been identified in this process. As such, City staff anticipates an increase in compliance and related revenues in FY 2025-26.

Other Taxes revenue category increased by $1.2 million, driven by three main areas:
• R eal property transfer tax was $529,125 or 40.7% less than budget. This tax is collected when properties transfer ownership such as selling a home. The ongoing higher interest rates throughout FY 2024-25 likely slowed property sales. • Hotel Occupancy Tax revenue was short by $889,726 or 20.1%. Staff is planning on conducting an audit on the TOT revenue in the next year to ensure compliance. • Industrial Construction Tax and Residential Construction tax together exceeded the budget by $2.6 million or 4.2% due to increase in construction permits which more than offset the reductions in the other two areas.

Licenses and Permits revenue increased by $3.5 million or 82.7% due to increased revenue from various permits, including building ($1.4 million), fire ($907,168), hazmat ($700,980) and use and variance permits ($314,304) related to increased construction in Livermore.

Charges for Current Services increased by $1.2 million due to an increase in Engineering Inspection and Filing fees as well as Plan Check fees as development continues throughout the City.

Table 3. General Fund Revenues - Revised Budget vs. Actual Revised
Budget
Unaudited
Actual Variance
Property Taxes $60,621, 418 $60,727,670 $106,252
Sales & Use Taxes 42,593,316 39,115,789 (3,477,527) Franchise Taxes 6,575,000 6,674,151 99,151 Business License Taxes 10,500,000 9,876,085 (623,915) Other Taxes 6,979,312 8,144,434 1,165,122 Licenses & Permits 4,259,000 7,781,679 3,522,679 Fines & Forfeitures 387,000 483,035 96,035 Use of Money and Property 7,237,501 7,880,689 643,188 Intergovernmental Revenue 3,833,548 4,165,847 332,299 Charges for Current Services 4,973,153 6,189,740 1,216,587 Other Revenue 840,900 843,801 2,901 Total Operating Revenue $148,800,148 $151,882,919 $3,082,771 Transfers In $914,206 $518,610 (395,596)
Total All Revenue $149,714,354 $152,401,529 $2,687,175
FY 2024-25
General Fund

EXHIBIT A
130
5 General Fund Expenditures. Actual General Fund operating expenditures were less than the projected budget by $5.5 million or -4.1%. Total expenditures, including transfers out, show an overall reduction of $5.4 million or -3.5%
Table 4 shows the major expenditure categories with a comparison of anticipated expenses from the amended budget to actual expenditures and the variance between the two. The following describes the significant variances.

Wages and Benefits expenses were less than the projected budget by $2.7 million or -3.6% due to attrition savings in FY 2024-25.

Services and Supplies were $2.8 million or 4.6% less than the projected budget. Contractual services were $1.2 million less than the projected budget across all General Fund programs.

There were other savings in the following categories rounding out the remainder of the savings.

1. Supplies and Equipment expenses: $647,533, 22.2% savings

2. M iscellaneous Expenses: $578,386, 17.0% savings

3. Repair and Maintenance expenses: $405,662, 14.0% savings

Transfer of Funds. As shown in Table 5, net transfers were $511,747 or 2.9% greater than the projected budget. The Downtown Revitalization Fee payments are recorded on the balance sheet and do not affect the budget. This year the City received a $69,526 payment for the Downtown Revitalization fund. The Library Foundation Grant did not occur as anticipated as staffing is currently directly charged to that grant. The transfer out to the Lighting and Landscaping Districts (LL&D) was also larger than expected due to additional contribution from the City to the Downtown LL&D as maximum allowable assessments have been levied against the parcels benefitting from the various improvements and expenses exceeded those assessments.

Table 4. General Fund Expenditures - Revised Budget vs. Actual Revised
Budget
Unaudited
Actual Variance
Wages and Benefits $76,797, 945 $74,125,283 ($2,672,662) Services and Supplies 64,260,845 61,433,277 (2,827,568) Capital Outlay 73,630 78,880 5,250 Total Operating Expenditures $141,132,420 $135,637,440 ($5,494,980) Transfers Out 18,702,627 18,818,778 116,151
Total all Expenditures $159,835,047 $154,456,218 ($5,378,829) Expenditure Categories
FY 2024-25

EXHIBIT A
131
6 Table 5. Transfers In and Transfers Out - Revised Budget vs. Actual Projected
Budget Actual Variance
OPERA TING TRA NSFERS IN - From:

Traffic Impact Fee $75,000 $66,618 ($8,382)
Maintenance District L&LD 270,000 312,430 42,430 CASP Cert & Training Fund 5,500 18,750 13,250 Gas Taxes 130,000 120,813 (9,187)
HHS - Federal Home Program 8,706 - (8,706) Downtown Revitalization(1) 400,000 - (400,000) Library Foundation Grant 25,000 - (25,000) OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - To:

Stormwater (2,300,000) (2,300,000) -
2020 COPs Series B (Debt Service) (3,885,000) (3,875,462) 9,538 2022 COPs (Debt Service) (2,590,000) (2,577,798) 12,202 Horizons (470,000) (470,000) -
Maintenance District L&LD (210,000) (336,007) (126,007) CIP Reserve (4,125,627) (4,125,627) -
Airport - (11,884) (11,884) General Liability (1,500,000) (1,500,000) -
Worker's Comp (3,500,000) (3,500,000) -
Fleet (122,000) (122,000) -
Net Transfers (17,788,421) ($18,300,168) ($511,747)
Notes:
(1) Downtown Revitalization fee payments are a balance sheet transaction and do not affect the budget.

Operating Transfers
FY 2024-25

EXHIBIT A
132
7 General Fund Balances and Allocations. Table 6 presents the proposed allocations to and changes in the General Fund Reserves. Actual Operating Reserves are $44.3 million or 30% of budgeted expenditures. The City’s policy is to maintain General Fund reserves equal to 30% of operating expenses. The $8.1 million allocations to be used in FY 2025-26 are for various carryforward contractual services ($1.5 million), one-time appropriations ($450,000), Internal service fund reserves ($1.8 million), and an allocation to CIP Reserves ($2.4 million) previously identified in Table 2. The $2.7 million remaining unallocated reserve in FY 2024-25 after allocations will be available to cover reserve requirements in the FY 2025-26 and 2026-27 budget.

Table 6. General Fund Reserves FY 2024-25 Unaudited
Fund Balance Category
FY 2023-24
Actual
FY 2024-25
Revised
Budget
FY 2024-25
Unaudited
Actuals
Ending Total Fund Balance: $60,023,198 $50,036,505 $57,968,509 Nonspendable: 5,544,536 5,467,472 5,273,139 Operating Reserves:

Pension 115 Trust (Committed) 6,188,621 6,188,621 6,758,239 Catastrophic Reserve 15% (Committed) 14,493,394 15,950,692 15,381,074 Economic Reserve 13.5% (Assigned) 18,613,813 19,925,382 19,925,382 Cashflow Reserve 1.5% (Unassigned) 2,068,201 2,213,931 2,213,931 Subtotal Operating Reserves
(30% of Operating Expenses and Debt Service) 41,364,029 44,278,626 44,278,626 Reserve for Carryforward Encumbrances and One-
time allocations 1,983,088
Reserves for Future General Fund Operations 2,357,327
Estimated allocations for ISF and Capital Reserves 3,725,589 Remaining Unassigned Fund Balance $13,114,633 $290,407 $350,740

EXHIBIT A
133
8 General Fund Contributions to the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department. The Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) budget had a net surplus of $644,628 associated with attrition savings, contractual services savings, and less equipment reserve expenses. The City funds LPFD through its Services and Supplies budget and has contributed the required contribution amount as budgeted.

Rather than receiving a refund on the excess contributions, staff from the member agencies, City of Pleasanton and City of Livermore, propose that each city use its respective $322,314 budget savings to increase reserves in the LPFD Workers Compensation fund to cover increased Claims Payable liabilities and be available to fund future Workers Compensation claims payments. See Table 7 below.

The following tables include all the City’s other funds in their respective categories. Fund balances are based on unaudited actual revenues and expenditures.

Enterprise Funds As described in Table 8 below, the City’s Enterprise Operating Fund balance showed a reduction of $11.3 million over the year, which is mainly due to a change in capital project expense recording. Beginning in FY 2024-25, staff set up capital project funds to record CIP revenues and expenses separately from operating expenses in the City’s new financial system. As a result, operating funds now transfer funding to CIP funds rather than including the capital project directly in the operating fund budget. Thus, unused capital project funding accumulates in the capital funds instead of the operating funds.

The following funds have significant variations.

The Airport Fund (F600) ended the year with a fund balance of approximately $1.1 million greater than projected. Revenues were greater than projected by approximately $265,549.

Actual operating expenses came in $678,530 less than budgeted resulting in the higher than anticipated fund balance.

The Stormwater Fund (F610) ended the year with a fund balance of $3.5 million which is approximately $2.9 million less than projected. Actual revenues did not come in as planned with a $3.4 shortfall in revenue due to not receiving anticipated Federal funding. There were, however, expenditure savings of $943,267. This main driver of savings was in Wages and Benefits ($407,392) and Contractual Service ($427,844). The remaining savings were seen throughout the other expense categories.

The Wastewater Fund (F620) ended the year with a fund balance of $31.0 million which is relatively unchanged from the beginning of the year. Revenues came in higher than expected by $1.4 million and expenditures were less than anticipated by $1.3 million. Attrition savings of Table 7: Surplus Contributions to LPFD
City of
Pleasanton
City of
Livermore
Total
Contributions
Workers Comp Reserves $322,314 $322,314 $644,628
Total Use of Surplus Contributions: $322,314 $322,314 $644,628 FY 2024-25

EXHIBIT A
134
9 $839,195 are the main reason for the reduced expenses. Other significant savings were seen in the supplies, equipment, repairs, and maintenance categories with savings of $310,663.

The Water Fund (F640) year-end fund balance of $8.7 million increased by $916,796 from the beginning of the fiscal year. Revenues were greater than expected by approximately $685,937 and expenditure savings of approximately $1.9 million resulted in an increased fund balance.

There were expense savings of $397,075 in Contractual Services and $956,025 in cost of sales.

The Wastewater Replacement Fund (F622) ended the year with a fund balance of $19.1 million, a decrease of approximately $14.5 million. Actual revenues were approximately $385,954 more than expected. A transfer out to the Capital Improvement Project Fund of $23.1 million drives the lower fund balance in the operating fund. The Contractual Services category had a savings of $241,526.

The Wastewater Connection Fee Fund (F623) ended the year with a fund balance of $6.2 million, an increase of $154,643 from anticipated. This can be attributed to higher than anticipated revenues of over $3.6 million due to increased construction in Livermore. Transfers to the CIP were $4.6 million.

The Water Replacement Fund (F642) ended the year with a fund balance of $28.3 million, which is approximately $1.4 million more than projected. Actual revenues were approximately $401,693 more than expected while operating expenses were less than originally projected by approximately $332,882. There were savings of $282,901 in the Contractual Service category.

Transfers to the CIP were $3.9 million.

The Water Connection Fees Fund (F643) ended the year with a fund balance of $1.3 million.

Revenues were higher by $1.3 million due to increased residential construction. There were expenditure savings of $135,494 in the Contractual Services category.

Table 8: Enterprise Funds

Capital Project Operating Funds as described in table 9 below, there was a decrease in total fund balances of $23.3 million or -17.1% over the fiscal year. As previously stated, the Capital Improvement Program budget was separated from the operating budget and placed into its own set of funds to record activity. Funding was transferred from operating funds to CIP funds, which is the main reason that the table shows a decrease of $23.3 million in overall fund balance in Fund Fund Name
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenues
Net
Transfers Expenditures
Transfers out
to CIP
Unaudited
Ending Fund
Balance
Change in
Fund Balance
600 Airport 8,682,383$ 4,816,425$ 11,884$ 3,073,455$ 660,000$ 9,777,238$ 1,094,855$ 610 Stormwater 2,906,963 1,179,798 2,300,000 2,924,246 - 3,462,515 555,552 612 Storm Drain 7,386,142 1,883,397 - 15,473 1,440,500 7,813,566 427,424 620 Wastewater 30,911,764 33,562,979 (6,935,000) 26,554,511 - 30,985,233 73,469 622 Wastewater Replacement 33,549,567 884,351 8,000,000 217,930 23,142,375 19,073,614 (14,475,953) 623 Wastewater Connection Fees 6,089,717 5,772,121 (1,065,000) - 4,552,478 6,244,360 154,643 640 Water 7,751,988 19,766,695 (1,758,795) 17,091,104 - 8,668,784 916,796 642 Water Replacement 29,673,641 730,556 2,000,000 266,337 3,883,000 28,254,860 (1,418,781) 643 Water Connection Fees (80,090) 1,643,269 (241,205) 20,507 - 1,301,468 1,381,558 126,872,075$ 70,239,592$ 2,311,884$ 50,163,561$ 33,678,353$ 115,581,637$ (11,290,438)$

EXHIBIT A
135
10 the Operating Capital Project funds. The following are the funds with additional significant variances.

Traffic Impact Fee (F510) ended the year with a $6.2 million increase in fund balance compared to the budget. The main driver for this was higher than anticipated revenues by $6.2 million as construction has increased in FY 2024-25.

TVTC 20% Fee (F511) ended the year with $3.9 million less in fund balance than what was budgeted. Revenues expected for this fund did not materialize as was anticipated.

Park Fee – AB1600 (F512) ended the year with a fund balance $1.2 million higher than projected. Revenues came in $1.2 million more than projected due to increased construction.

Expenses were close to anticipated which resulted in higher fund balance than projected during the budget preparation.

Transferable Development Credit (F582) ended the year with a fund balance of $4.7 million less than projected. Revenues came in $3.4 million less than projected and expenses were $1.3 million greater than budgeted to purchase the Goecken Road property.

Table 9: Capital Project Operating Funds

Debt Service Funds as described in the table below, ending fund balances were approximately as projected.

Table 10: Debt Service Funds

Fund Fund Name
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenues
Net
Transfers Ex penditures
Transfers out
to CIP
Unaudited
Ending Fund
Balance
Change in
Fund Balance
101 General Fund CIP Reserves $ 34,954,363 -$ 4,125, 627$ -$ 12,827,692$ 26,252,298$ (8,702,065)$ 510 Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) 24,279,196 7, 467,640 (66,618) 78,205 3,731,000 27,871,014 3,591,818 511 TVTC 20% Fee 3,130,224 1,247,766 - - - 4,377,990 1,247,766 512 Park Fee - AB 1600 4,596,202 7,711,614 - 5,782 3,630,357 8,671,677 4,075,475 513 Solid Waste & Recyc Impact Fee 2,551,982 1,510,287 - - - 4,062,269 1,510,287 514 COL Bike & Pedestrian Improve - 322,444 - - - 322,444 322,444 540 2022 COP Construction Fund 19,675,296 790,768 - - 20,466,063 0 (19,675,296) 550 County Measure D 267,829 243,709 - 360,346 - 151,192 (116,637) 551 County Meas BB-Bike/Pedestrian 1,678,272 619,865 - 2,935 1,220,000 1,075,202 (603,070) 552 County Meas BB-Local St & Rd 7,237,545 2,596,468 - 97,463 4,122,905 5,613,646 (1,623,899) 553 County Measure F Veh Reg Fee 1,498,715 406,970 - 2,494 800,000 1,103,191 (395,524) 560 State - Gas Tax 9,259,594 2,667,312 (120,813) 80,726 5,816,290 5,909,078 (3,350,516) 561 State - SB1 5,705,787 2,537,008 - 5,970 4,281,250 3,955,575 (1,750,212) 581 Public Utility Undergrounding 855,240 - - - - 855,240 - 582 Transferable Development Cred 19,282,635 3,667,001 - 1,305,195 - 21,644,441 2,361,806 583 SoLivSpec Plan & AD Closeout 1,178,109 - - - 152,201 1,025,908 (152,201) 136,150,989$ 31,788,852$ 3,938,197$ 1,939,116$ 57,047,758$ 112,891,164$ (23,259,825)$ Fund Fund Name
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenues
Net
Transfers Expenditures
Transfers out
to CIP
Unaudited
Ending Fund
Balance
Change in
Fund Balance
400 2020 COPS Series A -$ -$ 528,800$ 528,800$ -$ - -$ 401 2020 COPS Series B - - 3,875,462 3,875,462 - 0 0 402 2022 COPS 2 0 2,577,798 2,577,800 - 0 (2) 2$ 0$ 6,982,060$ 6,982,062$ -$ 0$ (2)$

EXHIBIT A
136
11 Special Revenue Funds as described in Table 11 below showed an overall increase in total fund balances of $8.9 million or 20.6%. As previously noted, in FY 2024-25 capital project budgets were moved to separate respective CIP funds to track CIP activity. This is shown as a transfer to the CIP from the operating funds. Some of the City’s Special Revenue Funds fund capital expenses. The following are the funds with significant variations.

Low Income Housing Fund (F200) actual expenditures for Contractual Services were $4.3 million less than anticipated due to the timing of the numerous new Housing Developments.

SOEF Social Op Endowment Fund (F202) Revenues this year exceeded the budget by $627,932. This revenue is attributable to developer fees included in a development agreement with Trumark Homes.

Local Housing Trust Fund (F207) is a newly created fund in FY 2024-25. Revenues of $5.0 million in form of a grant from the State of California for the Pacific Avenue Senior Living Project. This project broke ground late in FY 2024-25.

Downtown Revitalization Fee Fund (F280) has a $3.5 million negative fund balance due to an outstanding loan from the General Fund to the Downtown Revitalization Fee Fund. The City uses all Downtown Revitalization fees collected to repay the loan, which results in a reduced negative fund balance. In FY 2024-25, the City collected $69,526 in Downtown Revitalization Fees.

Community Benefit Fund (F291) is a newly created fund in FY 2024-25. This fund will be used to fund economic, climate resilience, community programs, and public spaces and facilities.

Funding for this comes from Development Agreements. This fund received $629,085 in funding from a Development Agreement with Trumark Homes in FY 2024-25.

EXHIBIT A
137
12 Table 11: Special Revenue Funds

Fund Fund Name
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenues
Net
Transfers Expenditures
Transfers out
to CIP
Unaudited
Ending Fund
Balance
Change in
Fund Balance
200 Low Income Housing Fund 8,150,149$ 875,240$ -$ 1,015,463$ -$ 8,009,927$ (140,222)$ 201 Housing Successor Agency 8,846,223 177,291 - 66 - 9,023,449 177,226 202 SOEF (Social Op Endowment) 6,755 629,267 - - - 636,022 629,267 203 Mortgage Assistance 1,899,750 4,650 - 2,457 - 1,901,943 2,193 204 HHS Loan Fund 234,000 - - - - 234,000 - 205 Cal Home Reuse 1,185,853 1,304 - 1,342 - 1,185,815 (38) 206 California Begin Program 625,331 - - 907 - 624,424 (907) 207 Local Housing Trust - 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 210 Horizons 620,973 875,938 470,000 986,853 - 980,058 359,085 211 Police Evidence (35,964) 6,852 - (29,112) - 0 35,964 212 Asset Seizure - State - 1,588 - - - 1,588 1,588 220 Grant - Federal Grant Fund 88,028 8,420 - 18,256 - 78,193 (9,835) 221 Asset Seizure - Dep of Justice 666,690 15,704 - 100,000 - 582,394 (84,296) 222 Asset Seizure - Treasury 361,042 8,797 - - - 369,839 8,797 223 Grant - HUD EDI Special Grant 122,277 - - 107 - 122,170 (107) 224 Grant - CDBG 444,642 487,447 - 581,382 - 350,707 (93,935) 225 Grant - Home Grant 364,680 2,000 - 91,289 - 275,391 (89,289) 226 FEMA Funding (55,208) - - - - (55,208) - 240 Grant - State Grant Fund 302,680 1,684,954 - 837,338 - 1,150,297 847,617 241 Opioid Settlement 86,300 296,666 - - - 382,966 296,666 242 PD COPS Grant - 267,742 - 140,974 - 126,768 126,768 260 Grant - Local & Other Grants (42,426) 201,052 - 10,000 - 148,626 191,052 280 Downtown Revitalization Fee (3,586,595) 69,526 - - - (3,517,069) 69,526 281 Parking In-Lieu Fee 31,200 47,142 - - - 78,342 47,142 282 Host Community Impact Fee $1,368,437 562,641 (528,800) 85,023 - 1,317,255 (51,182) 283 City Street Sweeping Fee 289,488 748,692 - 537,577 - 500,603 211,115 284 Public Art Fee 989,529 373,330 - 63,970 - 1,298,889 309,360 285 Vehicle Impound Fee 163,238 - - 20,804 - 142,434 (20,804) 286 Accessibility Compliance (21,000) 24,381 (18,750) 5,774 - (21,143) (143) 287 PEG Capital Fees 1,601,650 205,543 - - - 1,807,193 205,543 288 Import Mitigation Fee 4,375 - - 4,375 - 0 (4,375) 289 Solid Waste & Recycling Fee 10,643 335,400 - 153,472 - 192,571 181,928 290 Human Services Facility Fee 549,342 609,238 - 43,082 80,000 1,035,497 486,155 291 Community Benefit Fund - 629,085 - - - 629,085 629,085 300 Open Space Acquisition & Mgmt 2,907,557 4,927,438 - 5,671,930 - 2,163,065 (744,492) 310 Downtown LMD 437,048 466,601 336,007 854,076 - 385,579 (51,469) 311 Other LMD 9,790,016 3,571,383 (312,430) 3,167,732 - 9,881,237 91,221 320 El Charro CFD 2009-1 Maint 2,710,755 428,032 - 248,111 - 2,890,675 179,920 321 Other Maintenance CFDs 1,972,089 342,037 - 204,728 - 2,109,398 137,309 330 Library Donations 222,184 71,521 - 63,339 - 230,367 8,183 331 Police Donations 48,657 4,181 - - - 52,838 4,181 43,360,388$ 23,961,084$ (53,972)$ 14,881,315$ 80,000$ 52,306,185$ 8,945,797$

EXHIBIT A
138
13 Internal Service Funds, as described in Table 12 below, had an overall increase in total fund balances of $2.4 million or 9.9%. The following are the funds with significant variations.

General Liability (F700) ending the year with a $548,157 increase in actual fund balance primarily due to $376,808 less expenses than originally anticipated.

Worker’s Comp Insurance (F710) had an increase in the fund balance of $3.3 million. The projected ending fund balance was $1 million less than the actual ending balance, which is due to actual expenditures coming in less than the budget by $955,286.

Fleet and Equipment Services (F730) had a decrease in the actual fund balance of $990,592.

However, the ending fund balance is $1.8 million greater than the budgeted amount due to actual expenditures less than budget by $1.7 million. This is mainly due to the delay between ordering new vehicles and the time that they are received.

Facilities Rehabilitation Program (F740) ended the fiscal year $562,242 less in fund balance due to the use of fund balance to help pay for capital projects.

Table 12: Internal Services Funds

Fund Fund Name
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenues
Net
Transfers Expenditures
Transfers out
to CIP
Unaudited
Ending Fund
Balance
Change in
Fund Balance
700 General Liability 5,417,897$ 4,499, 989$ 1,500,000$ 5,451,832$ -$ 5,966,054$ 548,157$ 710 Workers Comp Insurance 2,875,678 1,611,871 3,500,000 1,831,709 - 6,155,840 3,280,162 720 Information Technology 2,340,300 6,970,080 - 6,893,235 - 2,417,145 76,845 730 Fleet & Equipment Services 8,481,938 5,693,757 122,000 6,746,349 60,000 7,491,346 (990,592) 740 Facilities Rehab Pgm 4,715,075 2,144,553 - 2,706,794 - 4,152,833 (562,242) 23,830,888$ 20,920,250$ 5,122,000$ 23,629,920$ 60,000$ 26,183,218$ 2,352,330$

EXHIBIT A
139
14 Capital Improvement Program Funds are included in the table below show the balances available for CIP projects. These are the City’s new CIP funds previously discussed. City staff also separated the General Fund Capital Reserves into its own separate fund - General Fund Capital Reserve Fund (Fund 101) - and therefore no longer resides in the General Fund operating fund. The Operating Capital Reserve Fund is grouped under the Operating Capital Funds as shown in Table 9. These balances are shown as funding and expenses for the CIP program. Three funds shown in the table below have negative unaudited fund balances at the end of FY 2024-25. While the expenses occurred in FY 2024-25 for those three funds, City staff anticipate receiving the outside funding reimbursements in FY 2025-26.

Table 13: Capital Improvement Program Funds

Fund Fund Name
Beginning
Fund Balance Revenues
Net
Transfers Expenditures
Transfers out
to CIP
Unaudited
Ending Fund
Balance
Change in
Fund Balance
601 CIP Airport -$ -$ 660, 000$ -$ -$ 660,000$ 660,000$ 611 CIP Stormwater & Storm Drain - - 6,492,192 2,831,097 - 3,661,095 3,661,095 621 CIP Wastewater - - 27,694,853 10,168,093 - 17,526,760 17,526,760 641 CIP Water - - 3,883,000 2,145,082 - 1,737,918 1,737,918 731 CIP Fleet & Equipment Svcs - - 520,000 215,691 - 304,309 304,309 741 CIP Facilities - - 3,720,000 271,255 - 3,448,745 3,448,745 810 CIP Multi Funded Governmental - - - - - - - 811 CIP General Fund - - 3,596,000 743,496 - 2,852,504 2,852,504 812 CIP Low Income Housing - - - - - - - 813 CIP Asset Seizure - County - - - - - - - 814 CIP Asset Seizure - DOJ - - - - - - - 815 CIP Asset Seizure - Treasury - - - - - - - 816 CIP Federal Grants Fund - - - 15,281 - (15,281) (15,281) 817 CIP State Grants Fund - 113,187 - 1,246,879 - (1,133,691) (1,133,691) 818 CIP Local Grants Fund - 5,139,000 - 19,629 - 5,119,371 5,119,371 819 CIP Parking-In-Lieu Fee - - - - - - - 820 CIP Host Community Impact Fee - - - - - - - 821 CIP Public Art Fee - - - - - - - 822 CIP Library Donations - - - - - - - 823 CIP Traffic Impact Fee - - 3,731,000 640,238 - 3,090,762 3,090,762 824 CIP TVTC 20% FEE - - - - - - - 825 CIP Park Fee - AB 1600 - - 3,630,357 663,566 - 2,966,791 2,966,791 826 CIP Solid Waste & Recycling - - - 20,572 - (20,572) (20,572) 827 CIP 2022 COP Construction - - 20,466,063 13,779,856 - 6,686,207 6,686,207 828 CIP County Measure D - - - - - - - 829 CIP County Measure BB-Bike/Ped - - 1,220,000 368,923 - 851,077 851,077 830 CIP County Measure BB-Street - - 4,122,905 663,903 - 3,459,002 3,459,002 831 CIP County Measure B-Bike/Ped 438,092 21,699 - 459,791 - (0) (438,092) 832 CIP County Measure B-Street 1,522,412 79,629 - 1,602,040 - 0 (1,522,412) 833 CIP County Measure F-Veh Reg - - 800,000 571 - 799,429 799,429 834 CIP State Gas Tax - - 5,816,290 2,597,692 - 3,218,598 3,218,598 835 CIP State SB1 - - 4,281,250 3,559,304 - 721,946 721,946 836 CIP Developers Deposit - - - - - - - 837 CIP So Liv Spec & AD Close - - 152,201 - - 152,201 152,201 838 CIP CDBG - - - - - - - 839 C
IP Human Svcs Facility Fee - - 80,000 73 - 79,927 79,927 840 CIP Community Benefit - - - - - - - 841 CIP COL Bike & Pedestrian - - - - - - - 1,960,504$ 5,353,515$ 90,866,111$ 42,013,032$ -$ 56,167,097$ 54,206,593$

EXHIBIT A
140
15 Appropriation of Expenditure Budget to Cover Shortfalls At the end of the FY 2024-25 some funds had expenditures more than budget. Table 14 below shows the affected funds and the over-expenditure. Below Table 14 includes an explanation for the over-expenditures.

Table 14: Appropriations to Cover FY 2024-25 Expenditures Over Budget

Host Community Impact Fee (F282) incurred $26,088 more expenses in contracts, supplies, and equipment categories than budgeted.

City Street Sweeping Fund (F283) incurred more expenses in contracts, supplies, and equipment categories than what was anticipated.

Other LMD Fund (F311) spent more than the budget primarily due to increased expenses for utilities and contractual services
Staff are requesting appropriation from the Host Community Impact Fee, City Street Sweeping Fee, and Other LMD funds in the amount of $682,246 to cover the three funds’ over- expenditures in FY 2024-25.

Table 15: Supplemental Appropriations for FY 2025-26

The City is conducting PFAS testing at the Airport. The expenses related to the PFAS testing should be charged to the Airport Fund. Staff did not anticipate those charges during the original FY 2025-26 budget process. As such, staff requests a supplemental appropriation of $300,000 from the Airport fund to pay for these services. In addition, the City must pay attorney fees of $271,001 associated with a recent water and sewer related settlement that were not budgeted.

Those costs will be shared by the Water, Sewer and General Liability funds.

Fund Fund Name
Amended
Budget
Unaudited
Actual
Expenses
Expended
over Budget
282 Host Community Impact Fee $587,735 $613,823 ($26,088) 283 City Street Sweeping Fee 529,186 537,577 (8,391) 311 Other LMD 2,832,395 3,480,162 (647,767) Totals: $3,949,316 $4,631,562 ($682,246)
FY 2024-25
Fund Fund Name
Supplemental
Appropriation
600 Airport $300,000
620
Wastewater 79,538
640 Water 55,962
700 General Liability 135,501
Total: $571,001
FY 2025-26

EXHIBIT A
141
16 FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACT
As described in Table 2, staff is requesting allocations of the $ 8.1 million General Fund surplus to cover various expenses in FY 2024-25 including contractual services as well as contributions to Facility Maintenance, Information Technology , Fleet Replacement reserves , Capital Improvement Program r eserves, and future operating reserves . Staff are also requesting additional contributions to LPFD Worker’s Compensation fund with the surplus of contributions to LPFD as shown in Table 7. As described in Table 14 above, staff is requesting s upplemental budget appropriations of $ 682,246 from three funds to cover FY 2024-25 budget shortfalls .

Finally, staff is requesting total supplemental appropriations of $571,001 in FY 2025-26.

EXHIBIT A
142

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 6.6

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT:

Resolution approving the City of Livermore Salary Plan to reflect salary increases to Executive Management (excluding Police Chief) and the City Manager effective November 17, 2025, and minimum wage increases effective December 29, 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
Staff recommends the following changes to the Salary Plan:
1 .

Incorporate wage related adjustment for the City Manager based on the new contract amendment;
2 .

Incorporate wage related adjustments for the Executive Management classifications (excluding the Police Chief);
3 .

Incorporate minimum wage increase to $16.90 per hour for the following classifications:

Department Assistant (Class Code 8200), Field/Maintenance Aide (Class Code 8205), Law Clerk (Class Code 8210), Library Aide (Class Code 8215), and Police Cadet (Class Code 8220)

DISCUSSION
Staff recommends the following changes to the Salary Plan:

1 .

The City Manager's existing contract follows the Livermore Management Group (LMG) cost of living adjustment, resulting in a 6% salary increase effective November 17, 2025. 143
2 .

Salary adjustments for the City's executive management classifications (excluding the Police Chief) have followed the increases received by the Livermore Management Group (LMG). LMG received a 6% wage adjustment in July. The recommendation is for the City's executive management classifications to receive a 6% wage adjustment effective November 17, 2025. In addition, currently, all five of the City's department heads have the same salary range, which does not adequately reflect the differences in the amount of responsibility, degree of risk, or the required expertise associated with each position. The proposed salary ranges are designed to recognize and address these differences and ensure compensation is aligned with the distinct demands of each position. Additionally, the Assistant City Manager salary increase maintains the 10% supervisory differential required by the City's Compensation Policy. 3 .

On August 1, 2025, the California Director of the Department of Finance certified that based on the annual inflation rate from 7/1/2024 to 6/30/2025, under Labor Code section 1182.12(c)(3)(A), the state hourly minimum wage must be increased effective January 1, 2026 to $16.90 per hour. The minimum salaries for the classifications of Department Assistant, Field/Maintenance Aide, Law Clerk, Library Aide, and Police Cadet will increase from $16.50 to $16.90 per hour effective December 29, 2025. There are currently 31 employees affected by this increase.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS

The fiscal impact of these changes is approximately $191,500, which will be absorbed in the current budget.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

5: A City that Works

GOAL

8: Attract, develop, engage, and retain a diverse and highly skilled workforce across the organization

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Salary Plan Dated November December

Prepared by: Kaylin Larson
HR Analyst II

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF LIVERMORE SALARY

PLAN TO REFLECT SALARY INCREASES TO EXECUTIVE

MANAGEMENT (EXCLUDING POLICE CHIEF) AND THE CITY
MANAGER EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 17, 2025, AND MINIMUM WAGE
INCREASES EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 29, 2025, IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION
570.5

The proposed City of Livermore Salary Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is intended to incorporate the following changes:

 Incorporate wage related adjustment for the City Manager based on the new contract;
 Incorporate wage related adjustments for the Executive Management classifications (excluding the Police Chief);
 Incorporate minimum wage increase to $16.90 per hour for the followin g classifications: Department Assistant (Class Code 8200), Field/Maintenance Aide (Class Code 8205), Law Clerk (Class Code 8210), Library Aide (Class Code 8215), and Police Cadet (Class Code 8220)

NOW, THEREFORE, B E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th e City of Livermore, that in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, it hereby approves the Salary Plan dated November/December.

On motion of Council M ember ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing r esolution was passed and adopted on October 27, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ /s/ Kimberly Cilley
Deborah L. Elam Kimberly Cilley
City Clerk City Attorney

Exhibit A – Salary Plan Dated November/December

145
Salar
y
Plan
Nov
ember/December

EXHIBIT A
146
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
4001 ACCOUNT CLERK 73,090.22 76,587.90 80,249.62 84,094.43 88,131.50 6,090.85 6,382.33 6,687.47 7,007.87 7,344.29
1,405.58 1,472.84 1,543.26 1,617.20 1,694.84

35.1395 36.8211 38.5816 40.4300 42.3709
4000 ACCOUNT CLERK, JUNIOR 65,744.90 69,032.14 72,483.75 76,107.94 79,913.34 5,478.74 5,752.68 6,040.31 6,342.33 6,659.45
1,264.33 1,327.54 1,393.92 1,463.61 1,536.80

31.6081 33.1885 34.8480 36.5904 38.4199
4002 ACCOUNT CLERK, SENIOR 79,423.91 83,227.43 87,221.12 91,414.52 95,817.58 6,618.66 6,935.62 7,268.43 7,617.88 7,984.80
1,527.38 1,600.53 1,677.33 1,757.97 1,842.65

38.1846 40.0132 41.9332 43.9493 46.0661
4020 ACCOUNTANT, JUNIOR* 96,122.29 100,928.40 105,974.82 111,273.56 116,837.24 8,010.19 8,410.70 8,831.24 9,272.80 9,736.44
1,848.51 1,940.93 2,037.98 2,139.88 2,246.87

46.2126 48.5233 50.9494 53.4969 56.1718
4010 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 84,282.47 88,328.93 92,577.71 97,038.92 101,723.21 7,023.54 7,360.74 7,714.81 8,086.58 8,476.93
1,620.82 1,698.63 1,780.34 1,866.13 1,956.22

40.5204 42.4658 44.5085 46.6533 48.9054
4030 ADMINISTRATIVE 88,251.03 92,495.92 96,953.04 101,633.03 106,547.01 ASSISTANT 7,354.25 7,707.99 8,079.42 8,469.42 8,878.92
1,697.14 1,778.77 1,864.48 1,954.48 2,048.98

42.4284 44.4692 46.6120 48.8620 51.2245
4052 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK I 66,339.50 69,488.81 72,795.58 76,267.68 79,913.39 5,528.29 5,790.73 6,066.30 6,355.64 6,659.45
1,275.76 1,336.32 1,399.92 1,466.69 1,536.80

31.8940 33.4081 34.9979 36.6672 38.4199
4051 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK II 71,041.79 74,426.20 77,979.83 81,711.18 85,629.06 5,920.15 6,202.18 6,498.32 6,809.27 7,135.76
1,366.19 1,431.27 1,499.61 1,571.37 1,646.71

34.1547 35.7818 37.4903 39.2842 41.1678
4040 ADMINISTRATIVE 88,251.03 92,495.92 96,953.04 101,633.03 106,547.01 TECHNICIAN 7,354.25 7,707.99 8,079.42 8,469.42 8,878.92 1,697.14 1,778.77 1,864.48 1,954.48 2,048.98

42.4284 44.4692 46.6120 48.8620 51.2245
5000 AIRPORT SERVICE 77,500.47 81,375.49 85,444.26 89,716.47 94,202.29 ATTENDANT* 6,458.37 6,781.29 7,120.36 7,476.37 7,850.19 1,490.39 1,564.91 1,643.16 1,725.32 1,811.58

37.2598 39.1228 41.0790 43.1329 45.2896
5001 AIRPORT SERVICE 83,109.87 87,265.36 91,628.63 96,210.06 101,020.56 ATTENDANT SENIOR* 6,925.82 7,272.11 7,635.72 8,017.51 8,418.38 1,598.27 1,678.18 1,762.09 1,850.19 1,942.70

39.9567 41.9545 44.0522 46.2548 48.5676
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025

EXHIBIT A
147
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
4060 ANIMAL CONTROL 87,564.16 91,774.70 96,195.76 100,837.87 105,712.09 OFFICER 7,297.01 7,647.89 8,016.31 8,403.16 8,809.34
1,683.93 1,764.90 1,849.92 1,939.19 2,032.92

42.0982 44.1225 46.2480 48.4798 50.8231
5010 ASSET MANAGEMENT 117,633.38 123,347.40 129,347.09 135,646.79 142,261.44 SPECIALIST 9,802.78 10,278.95 10,778.92 11,303.90 11,855.12 2,262.18 2,372.07 2,487.44 2,608.59 2,735.80

56.5545 59.3016 62.1861 65.2148 68.3949
4130 BUILDING INSPECTOR I 103,556.88 108,567.07 113,827.74 119,351.46 125,151.36 8,629.74 9,047.26 9,485.65 9,945.96 10,429.28
1,991.48 2,087.83 2,189.00 2,295.22 2,406.76

49.7870 52.1957 54.7249 57.3805 60.1689
4131 BUILDING INSPECTOR II 111,210.76 116,603.64 122,266.15 128,211.78 134,454.69 9,267.56 9,716.97 10,188.85 10,684.32 11,204.56
2,138.67 2,242.38 2,351.27 2,465.61 2,585.67

53.4667 56.0594 58.7818 61.6403 64.6417
4132 BUILDING INSPECTOR III 114,439.09 119,993.38 125,825.37 131,948.96 138,378.74 9,536.59 9,999.45 10,485.45 10,995.75 11,531.56
2,200.75 2,307.57 2,419.72 2,537.48 2,661.13

55.0188 57.6891 60.4930 63.4370 66.5282
4133 BUILDING INSPECTOR, 119,993.38 125,825.37 131,948.96 138,378.74 145,130.02 SENIOR 9,999.45 10,485.45 10,995.75 11,531.56 12,094.17 2,307.57 2,419.72 2,537.48 2,661.13 2,790.96

57.6891 60.4930 63.4370 66.5282 69.7741
4093 CIVIL ENGINEER, 124,324.14 130,540.35 137,067.37 143,920.74 151,116.78 ASSISTANT* 10,360.35 10,878.36 11,422.28 11,993.40 12,593.07 2,390.85 2,510.39 2,635.91 2,767.71 2,906.09

59.7712 62.7598 65.8978 69.1927 72.6523
4100 CIVIL ENGINEER, 133,473.47 139,979.49 146,810.81 153,983.68 161,515.20 ASSOCIATE 11,122.79 11,664.96 12,234.23 12,831.97 13,459.60 2,566.80 2,691.91 2,823.28 2,961.22 3,106.06

64.1699 67.2978 70.5821 74.0306 77.6515
4091 CIVIL ENGINEER, JUNIOR* 109,394.94 114,864.69 120,607.92 126,638.32 132,970.24 9,116.25 9,572.06 10,050.66 10,553.19 11,080.85
2,103.75 2,208.94 2,319.38 2,435.35 2,557.12

52.5937 55.2234 57.9846 60.8838 63.9280
4140 COMMUNITY 76,825.79 80,667.08 84,700.43 88,935.45 93,382.22 SERVICE SPECIALIST 6,402.15 6,722.26 7,058.37 7,411.29 7,781.85 1,477.42 1,551.29 1,628.85 1,710.30 1,795.81

36.9355 38.7823 40.7214 42.7574 44.8953
4141 COMMUNITY 80,632.31 84,663.93 88,897.13 93,341.99 98,009.09 SERVICE SPECIALIST II 6,719.36 7,055.33 7,408.09 7,778.50 8,167.42 1,550.62 1,628.15 1,709.56 1,795.04 1,884.79

38.7655 40.7038 42.7390 44.8760 47.1198

EXHIBIT A
148
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
4150 CRIME & INTELLIGENCE 107,074.59 112,428.32 118,049.73 123,952.22 130,149.83 ANALYST* 8,922.88 9,369.03 9,837.48 10,329.35 10,845.82 2,059.13 2,162.08 2,270.19 2,383.70 2,502.88

51.4782 54.0521 56.7547 59.5924 62.5720
4152 CRIME & INTELLIGENCE 125,577.30 131,856.17 138,448.98 145,371.43 152,640.00 ANALYST, SUPERVISING 10,464.78 10,988.01 11,537.42 12,114.29 12,720.00 2,414.95 2,535.70 2,662.48 2,795.60 2,935.38

60.3737 63.3924 66.5620 69.8901 73.3846
4160 CRIME PREVENTION 83,469.20 87,474.99 91,681.06 96,097.45 100,734.65 SPECIALIST 6,955.77 7,289.58 7,640.09 8,008.12 8,394.55 1,605.18 1,682.21 1,763.10 1,848.03 1,937.20

40.1294 42.0553 44.0774 46.2007 48.4301
4170 CRISIS INTERVENTION 100,608.08 111,892.53 117,402.91 123,188.80 129,263.99 SPECIALIST 8,384.01 9,324.38 9,783.58 10,265.73 10,772.00 1,934.77 2,151.78 2,257.75 2,369.02 2,485.85

48.3693 53.7945 56.4437 59.2254 62.1462
4050 DIVISION CLERK 74,809.86 78,382.70 82,134.16 86,073.20 90,209.20 6,234.16 6,531.89 6,844.51 7,172.77 7,517.43
1,438.65 1,507.36 1,579.50 1,655.25 1,734.79

35.9663 37.6840 39.4876 41.3814 43.3698
4180 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 96,146.19 100,953.50 106,001.18 111,301.24 116,866.30 SPECIALIST 8,012.18 8,412.79 8,833.43 9,275.10 9,738.86 1,848.97 1,941.41 2,038.48 2,140.41 2,247.43

46.2241 48.5353 50.9621 53.5102 56.1857
5090 ELECTRICIAN 108,422.10 113,843.21 119,535.37 125,512.14 131,787.75 9,035.18 9,486.93 9,961.28 10,459.35 10,982.31
2,085.04 2,189.29 2,298.76 2,413.70 2,534.38

52.1260 54.7323 57.4689 60.3424 63.3595
4092 ENGINEER, ASSISTANT* 118,403.94 124,324.14 130,540.35 137,067.37 143,920.74 9,867.00 10,360.35 10,878.36 11,422.28 11,993.40
2,277.00 2,390.85 2,510.39 2,635.91 2,767.71

56.9250 59.7712 62.7598 65.8978 69.1927
4090 ENGINEER, JUNIOR* 104,185.67 109,394.95 114,864.70 120,607.93 126,638.32 8,682.14 9,116.25 9,572.06 10,050.66 10,553.19
2,003.57 2,103.75 2,208.94 2,319.38 2,435.35

50.0893 52.5937 55.2234 57.9846 60.8838
4080 ENGINEERING SPECIALIST 117,633.37 123,347.39 129,347.08 135,646.78 142,261.43 9,802.78 10,278.95 10,778.92 11,303.90 11,855.12
2,262.18 2,372.07 2,487.44 2,608.59 2,735.80

56.5545 59.3016 62.1861 65.2148 68.3949
4070 ENGINEERING 101,339.05 106,238.33 111,382.58 116,784.05 122,455.59 TECHNICIAN, ASSIST 8,444.92 8,853.19 9,281.88 9,732.00 10,204.63 1,948.83 2,043.04 2,141.97 2,245.85 2,354.92

48.7207 51.0761 53.5493 56.1462 58.8729

EXHIBIT A
149
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
4071 ENGINEERING 108,585.61 113,847.21 119,371.90 125,172.83 131,263.81 TECHNICIAN, ASSOC 9,048.80 9,487.27 9,947.66 10,431.07 10,938.65 2,088.18 2,189.37 2,295.61 2,407.17 2,524.30

52.2046 54.7342 57.3903 60.1793 63.1076
4072 ENGINEERING 112,759.16 118,229.46 123,973.26 130,004.26 136,336.81 TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 9,396.60 9,852.46 10,331.11 10,833.69 11,361.40 2,168.45 2,273.64 2,384.10 2,500.08 2,621.86

54.2111 56.8411 59.6025 62.5021 65.5465
5030 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 66,763.23 70,101.39 73,606.46 77,286.78 81,151.12 TRAINEE* 5,563.60 5,841.78 6,133.87 6,440.57 6,762.59
1,283.91 1,348.10 1,415.51 1,486.28 1,560.60

32.0977 33.7026 35.3877 37.1571 39.0150
5031 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 74,691.77 78,426.36 82,347.68 86,465.06 90,788.31 WORKER I* 6,224.31 6,535.53 6,862.31 7,205.42 7,565.69
1,436.38 1,508.20 1,583.61 1,662.79 1,745.93

35.9095 37.7050 39.5902 41.5697 43.6482
5032 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 80,055.65 84,058.43 88,261.35 92,674.42 97,308.14 WORKER II* 6,671.30 7,004.87 7,355.11 7,722.87 8,109.01 1,539.53 1,616.51 1,697.33 1,782.20 1,871.31

38.4883 40.4127 42.4333 44.5550 46.7828
5033 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 84,015.01 88,215.76 92,626.55 97,257.88 102,120.77 WORKER, SENIOR* 7,001.25 7,351.31 7,718.88 8,104.82 8,510.06 1,615.67 1,696.46 1,781.28 1,870.34 1,963.86

40.3918 42.4114 44.5320 46.7586 49.0965
5034 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 94,472.84 99,196.48 104,156.30 109,364.11 114,832.32 WORKER, SUPERVISING* 7,872.74 8,266.37 8,679.69 9,113.68 9,569.36 1,816.79 1,907.62 2,003.01 2,103.16 2,208.31

45.4196 47.6906 50.0751 52.5789 55.2079
4190 FAMILY THERAPIST 101,942.27 106,871.72 112,047.64 117,482.34 123,188.80 8,495.19 8,905.98 9,337.30 9,790.20 10,265.73
1,960.43 2,055.23 2,154.76 2,259.28 2,369.02

49.0107 51.3806 53.8691 56.4819 59.2254
5040 FLEET SERVICES WORKER 65,984.63 69,116.20 72,404.34 75,856.88 79,482.05 5,498.72 5,759.68 6,033.70 6,321.41 6,623.50
1,268.94 1,329.16 1,392.39 1,458.79 1,528.50

31.7234 33.2289 34.8098 36.4697 38.2125
4200 GIS SPECIALIST 117,633.37 123,347.37 129,347.07 135,646.77 142,261.42 9,802.78 10,278.95 10,778.92 11,303.90 11,855.12
2,262.18 2,372.06 2,487.44 2,608.59 2,735.80

56.5545 59.3016 62.1861 65.2148 68.3949
5050 GROUNDSKEEPER 65,984.59 69,116.13 72,404.28 75,856.81 79,481.99 TRAINEE 5,498.72 5,759.68 6,033.69 6,321.40 6,623.50
1,268.93 1,329.16 1,392.39 1,458.78 1,528.50

31.7234 33.2289 34.8098 36.4696 38.2125

EXHIBIT A
150
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
5051 GROUNDSKEEPER I 73,750.06 77,269.89 80,965.70 84,846.32 88,920.97 6,145.84 6,439.16 6,747.14 7,070.53 7,410.08
1,418.27 1,485.96 1,557.03 1,631.66 1,710.02

35.4568 37.1490 38.9258 40.7915 42.7505
5052 GROUNDSKEEPER II 79,003.59 82,786.12 86,757.75 90,927.98 95,306.70 6,583.63 6,898.84 7,229.81 7,577.33 7,942.23
1,519.30 1,592.04 1,668.42 1,748.62 1,832.82

37.9825 39.8010 41.7105 43.7154 45.8205
5053 GROUNDSKEEPER III 82,881.53 86,857.94 91,033.16 95,417.16 100,020.36 6,906.79 7,238.16 7,586.10 7,951.43 8,335.03
1,593.88 1,670.35 1,750.64 1,834.95 1,923.47

39.8469 41.7586 43.7659 45.8736 48.0867
5055 GROUNDSKEEPER, 93,124.26 97,612.79 102,325.78 107,274.40 112,470.45 SUPERVISING 7,760.36 8,134.40 8,527.15 8,939.53 9,372.54 1,790.85 1,877.17 1,967.80 2,062.97 2,162.89

44.7713 46.9292 49.1951 51.5742 54.0723
4210 INFORMATION 92,069.18 96,672.64 101,506.27 106,581.58 111,910.66 TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN* 7,672.43 8,056.05 8,458.86 8,881.80 9,325.89 1,770.56 1,859.09 1,952.04 2,049.65 2,152.13

44.2640 46.4772 48.8011 51.2411 53.8032
4211 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 101,276.10 106,339.90 111,656.90 117,239.74 123,101.72 TECHNICIAN, SENIOR* 8,439.68 8,861.66 9,304.74 9,769.98 10,258.48 1,947.62 2,045.00 2,147.25 2,254.61 2,367.34

48.6904 51.1250 53.6812 56.3653 59.1835
5054 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 88,543.95 92,803.47 97,275.97 101,972.10 106,903.04 SPECIALIST 7,378.66 7,733.62 8,106.33 8,497.68 8,908.59 1,702.77 1,784.68 1,870.69 1,961.00 2,055.83

42.5692 44.6171 46.7673 49.0251 51.3957
4230 LIBRARIAN I 79,868.92 83,694.71 87,711.77 91,929.69 96,358.49 6,655.74 6,974.56 7,309.31 7,660.81 8,029.87
1,535.94 1,609.51 1,686.76 1,767.88 1,853.05

38.3985 40.2378 42.1691 44.1970 46.3262
4231 LIBRARIAN II 88,420.21 92,673.55 97,139.56 101,828.86 106,752.63 7,368.35 7,722.80 8,094.96 8,485.74 8,896.05
1,700.39 1,782.18 1,868.07 1,958.25 2,052.94

42.5097 44.5546 46.7017 48.9562 51.3234
4221 LIBRARY ASSISTANT 75,262.27 78,857.70 82,632.93 86,596.90 90,759.10 6,271.86 6,571.48 6,886.08 7,216.41 7,563.26
1,447.35 1,516.49 1,589.09 1,665.33 1,745.37

36.1838 37.9124 39.7274 41.6331 43.6342
4222 LIBRARY ASSISTANT, 84,282.47 88,328.93 92,577.71 97,038.92 101,723.21 SUPERVISING 7,023.54 7,360.74 7,714.81 8,086.58 8,476.93 1,620.82 1,698.63 1,780.34 1,866.13 1,956.22

40.5204 42.4658 44.5085 46.6533 48.9054

EXHIBIT A
151
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
4220 LIBRARY CLERK 66,339.50 69,488.81 72,795.58 76,267.68 79,913.39 5,528.29 5,790.73 6,066.30 6,355.64 6,659.45
1,275.76 1,336.32 1,399.92 1,466.69 1,536.80

31.89399 33.40808 34.99788 36.66715 38.41990
5060 MAINTENANCE 65,984.59 69,116.13 72,404.28 75,856.81 79,481.99 TRAINEE 5,498.72 5,759.68 6,033.69 6,321.40 6,623.50
1,268.93 1,329.16 1,392.39 1,458.78 1,528.50

31.72336 33.22891 34.80975 36.46962 38.21250
5061 MAINTENANCE 73,750.06 77,269.89 80,965.70 84,846.32 88,920.97 WORKER I 6,145.84 6,439.16 6,747.14 7,070.53 7,410.08
1,418.27 1,485.96 1,557.03 1,631.66 1,710.02

35.45676 37.14899 38.92582 40.79150 42.75047
5062 MAINTENANCE 79,003.59 82,786.11 86,757.75 90,927.98 95,306.70 WORKER II 6,583.63 6,898.84 7,229.81 7,577.33 7,942.23
1,519.30 1,592.04 1,668.42 1,748.62 1,832.82

37.98250 39.80101 41.71046 43.71538 45.82053
5063 MAINTENANCE 82,881.53 86,857.94 91,033.16 95,417.16 100,020.36 WORKER III 6,906.79 7,238.16 7,586.10 7,951.43 8,335.03 1,593.88 1,670.35 1,750.64 1,834.95 1,923.47

39.84689 41.75863 43.76594 45.87363 48.08671
5070 MECHANIC 95,257.31 100,020.17 105,021.18 110,272.24 115,785.85 7,938.11 8,335.01 8,751.76 9,189.35 9,648.82
1,831.87 1,923.46 2,019.64 2,120.62 2,226.65

45.79678 48.08662 50.49095 53.01550 55.66627
5071 MECHANIC SENIOR 103,393.20 108,562.86 113,991.00 119,690.55 125,675.08 8,616.10 9,046.90 9,499.25 9,974.21 10,472.92
1,988.33 2,087.75 2,192.13 2,301.74 2,416.83

49.70827 52.19368 54.80337 57.54353 60.42071
4240 NEIGHBORHOOD 108,585.61 113,847.21 119,371.90 125,172.83 131,263.81 PRESERVATION OFFICER 9,048.80 9,487.27 9,947.66 10,431.07 10,938.65 2,088.18 2,189.37 2,295.61 2,407.17 2,524.30

52.20462 54.73424 57.39034 60.17925 63.10760
5020 PARTS AND INVENTORY 77,134.06 80,823.08 84,696.57 88,763.72 93,034.25 CONTROL WORKER 6,427.84 6,735.26 7,058.05 7,396.98 7,752.85 1,483.35 1,554.29 1,628.78 1,706.99 1,789.12

37.08368 38.85725 40.71950 42.67487 44.72800
4250 PERMIT TECHNICIAN* 78,795.70 82,735.48 86,872.25 91,215.86 95,776.65 6,566.31 6,894.62 7,239.35 7,601.32 7,981.39
1,515.30 1,591.07 1,670.62 1,754.15 1,841.86

37.88255 39.77667 41.76550 43.85378 46.04647
4251 PERMIT TECHNICIAN II* 84,116.10 88,321.91 92,738.01 97,374.91 102,243.65 7,009.68 7,360.16 7,728.17 8,114.58 8,520.30
1,617.62 1,698.50 1,783.42 1,872.59 1,966.22

40.44043 42.46246 44.58558 46.81486 49.15560

EXHIBIT A
152
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
4260 PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 133,362.24 139,862.68 146,688.13 153,854.89 161,379.98 11,113.52 11,655.22 12,224.01 12,821.24 13,448.33
2,564.66 2,689.67 2,820.93 2,958.75 3,103.46

64.11646 67.24167 70.52314 73.96870 77.58653
4120 PLANNER, ASSISTANT 108,260.07 113,505.41 119,013.02 124,796.00 130,868.12 9,021.67 9,458.78 9,917.75 10,399.67 10,905.68
2,081.92 2,182.80 2,288.71 2,399.92 2,516.69

52.04811 54.56991 57.21780 59.99808 62.91737
4121 PLANNER, ASSOCIATE 124,796.00 130,868.12 137,243.86 143,938.39 150,967.64 10,399.67 10,905.68 11,436.99 11,994.87 12,580.64
2,399.92 2,516.69 2,639.31 2,768.05 2,903.22

59.99808 62.91737 65.98263 69.20115 72.58060
4122 PLANNER, SENIOR 130,868.15 137,243.88 143,938.41 150,967.66 158,348.38 10,905.68 11,436.99 11,994.87 12,580.64 13,195.70
2,516.70 2,639.31 2,768.05 2,903.22 3,045.16

62.91738 65.98263 69.20116 72.58061 76.12903
4270 POLICE CLERK 72,820.08 76,293.40 79,940.42 83,769.79 87,790.59 6,068.34 6,357.78 6,661.70 6,980.82 7,315.88
1,400.39 1,467.18 1,537.32 1,610.96 1,688.28

35.00965 36.67952 38.43289 40.27394 42.20701
4271 POLICE CLERK, SENIOR 76,293.49 79,940.49 83,769.86 87,790.67 92,012.55 6,357.79 6,661.71 6,980.82 7,315.89 7,667.71
1,467.18 1,537.32 1,610.96 1,688.28 1,769.47

36.67956 38.43293 40.27397 42.20705 44.23680
4272 POLICE CLERK, SUPERVISING 89,921.31 94,249.70 98,794.51 103,566.59 108,577.24 7,493.44 7,854.14 8,232.88 8,630.55 9,048.10
1,729.26 1,812.49 1,899.89 1,991.67 2,088.02

43.23140 45.31236 47.49736 49.79163 52.20060
4280 POLICE IDENTIFICATION 91,602.23 96,014.66 100,647.73 105,512.45 110,620.42 TECHNICIAN 7,633.52 8,001.22 8,387.31 8,792.70 9,218.37 1,761.58 1,846.44 1,935.53 2,029.09 2,127.32

44.03953 46.16089 48.38833 50.72714 53.18289
4290 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE 77,420.30 81,123.64 85,012.18 89,095.11 93,382.22 SPECIALIST 6,451.69 6,760.30 7,084.35 7,424.59 7,781.85 1,488.85 1,560.07 1,634.85 1,713.37 1,795.81

37.22130 39.00175 40.87124 42.83419 44.89530
4291 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE 87,399.93 91,602.25 96,014.68 100,647.76 105,512.47 SPECIALIST, SUPERVISING 7,283.33 7,633.52 8,001.22 8,387.31 8,792.71 1,680.77 1,761.58 1,846.44 1,935.53 2,029.09

42.01920 44.03954 46.16090 48.38835 50.72715
4300 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER* 96,606.90 101,437.25 106,509.11 111,834.57 117,426.29 8,050.58 8,453.10 8,875.76 9,319.55 9,785.52
1,857.83 1,950.72 2,048.25 2,150.66 2,258.20

46.44563 48.76791 51.20630 53.76662 56.45495

EXHIBIT A
153
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
4301 PUBLIC SAFETY 101,288.03 106,352.43 111,670.05 117,253.55 123,116.23 DISPATCHER, SENIOR* 8,440.67 8,862.70 9,305.84 9,771.13 10,259.69 1,947.85 2,045.24 2,147.50 2,254.88 2,367.62

48.69617 51.13098 53.68752 56.37190 59.19050
4302 PUBLIC SAFETY 111,426.61 116,997.94 122,847.83 128,990.23 135,439.74 DISPATCHER, SUPERVISING* 9,285.55 9,749.83 10,237.32 10,749.19 11,286.64 2,142.82 2,249.96 2,362.46 2,480.58 2,604.61

53.57048 56.24901 59.06146 62.01453 65.11526
4310 PURCHASING SPECIALIST, 94,387.29 99,064.42 103,975.41 109,131.95 114,546.31 SUPERVISING 7,865.61 8,255.37 8,664.62 9,094.33 9,545.53 1,815.14 1,905.09 1,999.53 2,098.69 2,202.81

45.37850 47.62713 49.98818 52.46728 55.07034
4320 RECYCLING SPECIALIST 96,740.72 101,410.09 106,312.94 111,460.92 116,866.27 8,061.73 8,450.84 8,859.41 9,288.41 9,738.86
1,860.40 1,950.19 2,044.48 2,143.48 2,247.43

46.50996 48.75485 51.11199 53.58698 56.18571
5081 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 83,755.52 87,943.30 92,340.47 96,957.49 101,805.37 TECHNICIAN TRAINEE* 6,979.63 7,328.61 7,695.04 8,079.79 8,483.78 1,610.68 1,691.22 1,775.78 1,864.57 1,957.80

40.26708 42.28043 44.39446 46.61418 48.94489
5080 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 89,414.51 93,885.24 98,579.50 103,508.47 108,683.89 TECHNICIAN* 7,451.21 7,823.77 8,214.96 8,625.71 9,056.99 1,719.51 1,805.49 1,895.76 1,990.55 2,090.07

42.98775 45.13713 47.39399 49.76369 52.25187
5082 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 97,711.38 102,596.95 107,726.80 113,113.14 118,768.80 TECHNICIAN, SENIOR* 8,142.62 8,549.75 8,977.23 9,426.10 9,897.40 1,879.07 1,973.02 2,071.67 2,175.25 2,284.02

46.97663 49.32546 51.79173 54.38132 57.10038
4110 TRANSPORTATION 133,473.47 139,979.49 146,810.81 153,983.68 161,515.20 ENGINEER, ASSOCIATE 11,122.79 11,664.96 12,234.23 12,831.97 13,459.60 2,566.80 2,691.91 2,823.28 2,961.22 3,106.06

64.16994 67.29783 70.58212 74.03062 77.65154
5150 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 66,588.13 69,917.54 73,413.42 77,084.09 80,938.29 SYSTEMS TRAINEE* 5,549.01 5,826.46 6,117.79 6,423.67 6,744.86 1,280.54 1,344.57 1,411.80 1,482.39 1,556.51

32.01352 33.61420 35.29491 37.05966 38.91264
5151 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 76,576.35 80,405.17 84,425.43 88,646.70 93,079.03 SYSTEMS WORKER I* 6,381.36 6,700.43 7,035.45 7,387.23 7,756.59 1,472.62 1,546.25 1,623.57 1,704.74 1,789.98

36.81555 38.65633 40.58915 42.61861 44.74953
5152 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 84,233.99 88,445.69 92,867.97 97,511.37 102,386.94 SYSTEMS WORKER II* 7,019.50 7,370.47 7,739.00 8,125.95 8,532.25 1,619.88 1,700.88 1,785.92 1,875.22 1,968.98

40.49711 42.52197 44.64806 46.88047 49.22449

EXHIBIT A
154
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
5153 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 92,657.38 97,290.25 102,154.76 107,262.50 112,625.63 SYSTEMS WORKER III* 7,721.45 8,107.52 8,512.90 8,938.54 9,385.47 1,781.87 1,870.97 1,964.51 2,062.74 2,165.88

44.54682 46.77416 49.11287 51.56851 54.14694
5160 WATER DISTRIBUTION 71,867.45 75,460.82 79,233.86 83,195.55 87,355.33 OPERATOR TRAINEE* 5,988.95 6,288.40 6,602.82 6,932.96 7,279.61 1,382.07 1,451.17 1,523.73 1,599.91 1,679.91

34.55166 36.27924 38.09320 39.99786 41.99775
5161 WATER DISTRIBUTION 80,426.65 84,447.98 88,670.38 93,103.90 97,759.09 OPERATOR I* 6,702.22 7,037.33 7,389.20 7,758.66 8,146.59 1,546.67 1,624.00 1,705.20 1,790.46 1,879.98

38.66666 40.59999 42.62999 44.76149 46.99956
5162 WATER DISTRIBUTION 92,064.41 96,667.63 101,501.01 106,576.06 111,904.87 OPERATOR II* 7,672.03 8,055.64 8,458.42 8,881.34 9,325.41 1,770.47 1,858.99 1,951.94 2,049.54 2,152.02

44.26174 46.47482 48.79856 51.23849 53.80042
5163 WATER DISTRIBUTION 99,202.21 104,162.32 109,370.44 114,838.96 120,580.91 OPERATOR III* 8,266.85 8,680.19 9,114.20 9,569.91 10,048.41 1,907.73 2,003.12 2,103.28 2,208.44 2,318.86

47.69337 50.07804 52.58194 55.21104 57.97159
5164 WATER DISTRIBUTION 104,161.67 109,369.75 114,838.24 120,580.15 126,609.16 SENIOR OPERATOR* 8,680.14 9,114.15 9,569.85 10,048.35 10,550.76 2,003.11 2,103.26 2,208.43 2,318.85 2,434.79

50.07773 52.58161 55.21069 57.97123 60.86979
5165 WATER DISTRIBUTION 114,138.14 119,845.05 125,837.30 132,129.17 138,735.63 SUPERVISING OPERATOR* 9,511.51 9,987.09 10,486.44 11,010.76 11,561.30 2,194.96 2,304.71 2,419.95 2,540.95 2,667.99

54.87411 57.61781 60.49870 63.52364 66.69982
5170 WATER RESOURCES 104,722.83 109,832.89 115,198.47 120,832.33 126,747.88 COORDINATOR 8,726.90 9,152.74 9,599.87 10,069.36 10,562.32 2,013.90 2,112.17 2,215.36 2,323.70 2,437.46

50.34751 52.80427 55.38388 58.09247 60.93648
5171 WATER RESOURCES 113,734.33 119,421.05 125,392.10 131,661.70 138,244.78 COORDINATOR - ELECTRICAL & 9,477.86 9,951.75 10,449.34 10,971.81 11,520.40 INSTRUMENTATION 2,187.20 2,296.56 2,411.39 2,531.96 2,658.55

54.67997 57.41397 60.28466 63.29889 66.46384
5172 WATER RESOURCES 115,447.61 121,219.99 127,280.99 133,645.04 140,327.29 COORDINATOR - 9,620.63 10,101.67 10,606.75 11,137.09 11,693.94 SOURCE CONTROL* 2,220.15 2,331.15 2,447.71 2,570.10 2,698.60

55.50366 58.27884 61.19278 64.25242 67.46504
5173 WATER RESOURCES 112,594.10 118,223.80 124,134.99 130,341.74 136,858.83 COORDINATOR - 9,382.84 9,851.98 10,344.58 10,861.81 11,404.90 MAINTENANCE* 2,165.27 2,273.53 2,387.21 2,506.57 2,631.90

54.13178 56.83837 59.68028 62.66430 65.79751

EXHIBIT A
155
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
5100 WR INSTRUMENT 103,503.40 108,678.57 114,112.50 119,818.13 125,809.04 CONTROL TECHNICIAN 8,625.28 9,056.55 9,509.38 9,984.84 10,484.09 1,990.45 2,089.97 2,194.47 2,304.19 2,419.40

49.76125 52.24931 54.86178 57.60487 60.48512
5110 WR LABORATORY 96,802.84 101,642.98 106,725.13 112,061.39 117,664.46 TECHNICIAN* 8,066.90 8,470.25 8,893.76 9,338.45 9,805.37 1,861.59 1,954.67 2,052.41 2,155.03 2,262.78

46.53983 48.86682 51.31016 53.87567 56.56945
5120 WR MECHANIC I* 95,143.69 99,900.87 104,895.91 110,140.71 115,647.75 7,928.64 8,325.07 8,741.33 9,178.39 9,637.31
1,829.69 1,921.17 2,017.23 2,118.09 2,224.00

45.74216 48.02926 50.43073 52.95226 55.59988
5121 WR MECHANIC II* 107,232.48 112,594.10 118,223.80 124,134.99 130,341.74 8,936.04 9,382.84 9,851.98 10,344.58 10,861.81
2,062.16 2,165.27 2,273.53 2,387.21 2,506.57

51.55408 54.13178 56.83837 59.68028 62.66430
5131 WR OPERATOR - GRADE I* 104,334.79 109,551.53 115,029.11 120,780.57 126,819.60 8,694.57 9,129.29 9,585.76 10,065.05 10,568.30
2,006.44 2,106.76 2,212.10 2,322.70 2,438.84

50.16096 52.66900 55.30246 58.06758 60.97096
5132 WR OPERATOR - GRADE II* 109,551.53 115,029.11 120,780.57 126,819.60 133,160.58 9,129.29 9,585.76 10,065.05 10,568.30 11,096.72
2,106.76 2,212.10 2,322.70 2,438.84 2,560.78

52.66900 55.30246 58.06758 60.97096 64.01951
5133 WR OPERATOR - GRADE III* 118,315.66 124,231.44 130,443.01 136,965.16 143,813.42 9,859.64 10,352.62 10,870.25 11,413.76 11,984.45
2,275.30 2,389.07 2,508.52 2,633.95 2,765.64

56.88253 59.72665 62.71299 65.84863 69.14107
5130 WR OPERATOR - TRAINEE* 90,725.90 95,262.20 100,025.31 105,026.58 110,277.91 7,560.49 7,938.52 8,335.44 8,752.22 9,189.83
1,744.73 1,831.97 1,923.56 2,019.74 2,120.73

43.61822 45.79913 48.08909 50.49355 53.01823
5134 WR SENIOR OPERATOR* 124,231.44 130,443.01 136,965.16 143,813.42 151,004.09 10,352.62 10,870.25 11,413.76 11,984.45 12,583.67
2,389.07 2,508.52 2,633.95 2,765.64 2,903.92

59.72665 62.71299 65.84863 69.14107 72.59812
5141 WR SOURCE CONTROL 109,950.10 115,447.60 121,219.98 127,280.98 133,645.03 INSPECTOR* 9,162.51 9,620.63 10,101.67 10,606.75 11,137.09 2,114.43 2,220.15 2,331.15 2,447.71 2,570.10

52.86063 55.50365 58.27884 61.19278 64.25242
5140 WR SOURCE CONTROL 93,055.10 97,707.85 102,593.24 107,722.90 113,109.04 TECHNICIAN 7,754.59 8,142.32 8,549.44 8,976.91 9,425.75 1,789.52 1,879.00 1,972.95 2,071.59 2,175.17

44.73803 46.97493 49.32367 51.78986 54.37935

EXHIBIT A
156
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/06/2025
5135 WR SUPERVISING 137,721.92 144,608.02 151,838.42 159,430.34 167,401.86 OPERATOR* 11,476.83 12,050.67 12,653.20 13,285.86 13,950.16 2,648.50 2,780.92 2,919.97 3,065.97 3,219.27

66.21246 69.52309 72.99924 76.64920 80.48166
4330 YOUTH SERVICES CASE 92,600.60 97,230.63 102,092.16 107,196.77 112,556.61 COORDINATOR 7,716.72 8,102.55 8,507.68 8,933.06 9,379.72 1,780.78 1,869.82 1,963.31 2,061.48 2,164.55

44.51952 46.74550 49.08277 51.53691 54.11375
*Received Market/Internal equity Adjustments

EXHIBIT A
157

CLASS SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CODE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
3110 POLICE OFFICER 126,894.64 133,239.37 139,901.34 146,896.41 154,241.23 10,574.55 11,103.28 11,658.45 12,241.37 12,853.44
2440.28 2562.30 2690.41 2824.93 2966.18

61.00704 64.05739 67.26026 70.62327 74.15444
3100 POLICE SERGEANT 157,895.87 165,790.66 174,080.19 182,784.20 191,923.41 13,157.99 13,815.89 14,506.68 15,232.02 15,993.62
3036.46 3188.28 3347.70 3515.08 3690.83

75.91148 79.70705 83.69240 87.87702 92.27087
3120 POLICE TRAINEE 44.44605 - - - -
(Non-Sworn)

CITY OF LIVERMORE

POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
EFFECTIVE 05/05/2025

2. LPOA May 5, 2025
9/29/2025 Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
158
Class
Code Classification Monthly Salary Range
$15,314.56 - $19,143.20
2030 Assistant Community Development Director
2045 Assistant Public Works Director
2060 City Engineer
$14,246.41 - $17,808.01
2025 Assistant City Engineer
2050 Building Official
2090 Finance Manager
2125 Maintenance and Golf Operations Manager
2145 Planning Manager
2220 Water Resources Division Manager
$13,652.80 - $17,066.00
2005 Airport Manager
2095 Housing & Human Services Manager
2115 Information Technology Manager
$13,402.20 - $16,752.75
2200 Senior Transportation Engineer
$12,860.47 - $16,075.59
2140 Permit Center Manager
$12,834.62 - $16,043.27
2190 Senior Civil Engineer
$12,681.30 - $15,851.63
2040 Assistant Library Director
2070 IT Operations Manager
2165 Police Support Services Manager
2170 Principal Planner
$12,311.95 - $15,389.94
2055 City Clerk
2100 Housing Programs Manager
2105 Human Services Programs Manager
2225 Water Resources Operations Manager*
2231 Water Resources Technical Programs Manager P.E.
2240 Youth and Family Services Manager - Clinical
$12,059.41 - $15,074.26
2085 Economic Development Manager
$11,624.21 - $14,530.26
2035 Assistant Finance Manager
2120 Inspection & Neighborhood Preservation Manager
2230 Water Resources Technical Programs Manager

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$8,398 - $19,145/month
Effective July 14, 2025

EXHIBIT A
159
Class
Code Classification Monthly Salary Range

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$8,398 - $19,145/month
Effective July 14, 2025
$11,381.38 - $14,226.72
2215 Water Distribution Operations Manager
$11,049.87 - $13,812.34
2000 Accounting Supervisor
2110 Information Technology Coordinator
2195 Management Analyst, Senior
2150 Police Business Services Manager
2175 Public Works Manager
2210 Network Engineer
$10,932.58 - $13,665.73
2065 Construction Inspection Manager
$10,882.69 - $13,603.36
2155 Police Facility & Equipment Manager
$10,637.34 - $13,296.68
2006 Assistant Airport Manager
2180 Public Works Supervisor
$10,327.52 - $12,909.40
2020 Assistant City Clerk
2135 Management Analyst II
2160 Police Media & Community Relations Analyst
$9,155.01 - $11,443.76
2205 Library Manager**
$8,398.68 - $10,498.35
2080 Deputy City Clerk
2130 Management Analyst I
*Internal Equity Adjustment effective 10/6/2025
**Retitled

EXHIBIT A
160

CITY OF LIVERMORE

POLICE MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$16,350 - $25,350/month
Effective July 14, 2025
Class
Code Classification Salary Range
3000 Police Captain $20,276.58 - $25,345.73
3010 Police Lieutenant $16,350.16 - $20,437.70

EXHIBIT A
161
Class
Code Classification
2405 Assistant Administrative Services Director (Conf) $15,314.56 - $19,143.20 2440 Assistant City Attorney, Senior (Confidential) $16,511.22 - $20,639.03 2442 Assistant City Attorney (Confidential) $15,314.56 - $19,143.20 2400 Assistant to the City Manager (Confidential) $13,543.31 - $16,929.14 2444 Deputy City Attorney (Confidential) $10,882.69 - $13,603.36 2420 Human Resources Manager (Confidential) $14,246.41 - $17,808.01 2450 Human Resources Analyst, Senior (Conf) $11,049.87 - $13,812.34 2411 Human Resources Analyst II (Confidential) $10,327.52 - $12,909.40 2410 Human Resources Analyst I (Confidential) $8,398.68 - $10,498.35 2460 Management Analyst, Senior (Confidential) $11,049.87 - $13,812.34 2431 Management Analyst II (Confidential) $10,327.52 - $12,909.40 2430 Management Analyst I (Confidential) $8,398.68 - $10,498.35 2465 Risk Manager (Confidential) $12,473.31 - $15,591.64

CITY OF LIVERMORE
Monthly Salary Range
Effective July 14, 2025
$8,398 - $20,640/month

MANAGEMENT CONFIDENTIAL SALARY SCHEDULE

EXHIBIT A
162
Class
Code Classifications
2600 Administrative Receptionist $5,562.90 - $6,953.62
2610 Administrative Specialist I $6,438.89 - $8,048.61
2611 Administrative Specialist II $7,241.68 - $9,052.10 2620 Executive Assistant $9,270.46 - $11,588.07
2630 Human Resources Clerk I $6,438.89 - $8,048.61
2631 Human Resources Clerk II $7,083.50 - $8,854.37
2640 Human Resources Technician $7,772.46 - $9,715.57
2650 Law Office Supervisor $9,270.46 - $11,588.07
2660 Legal Assistant $7,698.58 - $9,623.23
Monthly Salary Range

CITY OF LIVERMORE

CONFIDENTIAL SALARY SCHEDULE
$5,560 - $11,590/month
Effective July 14, 2025

EXHIBIT A
163
Class
Code Classification Monthly Salary Range
1235 Police Chief* $22,925.22 - $28,656.53
1200 Assistant City Manager $20,637.22 - $25,796.53
1220 Community Development Director $18,761.11 - $23,451.39 1215 Administrative Services Director $18,303.52 - $22,879.40 1240 Public Works Director $18,303.52 - $22,879.40
1225 Innovation & Economic Development Dir $17,857.10 - $22,321.37 1230 Library Services Director $17,857.10 - $22,321.37
1205 Deputy City Manager $15,314.56 - $19,143.20
1210 Deputy City Manager/City Clerk $15,314.56 - $19,143.20 *10% Salary Adjustment effective 07/14/2025

CITY OF LIVERMORE

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$15,314 - $28,657/month
Effective November 17, 2025

EXHIBIT A
164

CITY OF LIVERMORE

APPOINTED MANAGEMENT
Class
Code Classification Annual Salary Effective
1000 City Manager $392,895 11/17/2025
1100 City Attorney $315,269 9/29/2025

EXHIBIT A
165

CITY OF LIVERMORE

UNCLASSIFIED AND HOURLY SALARY SCHEDULE
Class
Code Classification Hourly Salary Range Effective Date 8200 Department Assistant $16.90 - $30.00 12/29/25
8205 Field/Maintenance Aide $16.90 - $30.00 12/29/25
8210 Law Clerk $16.90 - $26.00 12/29/25
8230 Temporary Librarian $22.00 - $32.00 01/01/24
8235 Temporary Library Assistant $20.00 - $30.00 01/01/24 8240 Temporary Library Clerk $18.00 - $28.00 01/01/24
8215 Library Aide $16.90 - $20.00 12/29/25
8220 Police Cadet $16.90 - $26.00 12/29/25
8225 Special Projects Coordinator $20.00 - $100.00 12/20/21

EXHIBIT A
166

CITY OF LIVERMORE

RETIRED ANNUITANTS
Class
Code Classification Hourly Salary Range Effective Date 8500 Retired Annuitant - Assistant City Engineer $82.19 - $102.73 07/28/25 8505 Retired Annuitant - Senior Civil Engineer $74.05 - $92.55 07/28/25 8510 Retired Annuitant - Associate Civil Engineer $64.16 - $77.65 10/06/25 8515 Retired Annuitant - Planning Manager $82.19 - $102.73 07/28/25 8525 Retired Annuitant - Senior Planner $62.91 - $76.12 10/06/25 8520 Retired Annuitant - Associate Planner $59.99 - $72.58 10/06/25 8530 Retired Annuitant - Police Officer $61.01 - $74.15 07/28/25 8535 Retired Annuitant - Public Safety Dispatcher $46.44 - $56.45 10/06/25 8540 Retired Annuitant - Senior Management Analyst $63.75 - $79.68 07/28/25 8545 Retired Annuitant - Senior Human Resources Analyst $63.75 - $79.68 07/28/25 8550 Retired Annuitant - Public Works Supervisor $61.37 - $76.71 07/28/25 8555 Retired Annuitant - Management Analyst II $59.58 - $74.47 07/28/25 8560 Retired Annuitant - Administrative Clerk I $31.89 - $38.41 10/06/25 8565 Retired Annuitant - Library Clerk $31.89 - $38.41 10/06/25

EXHIBIT A
167

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. 7.1

DATE:

October 27, 2025
TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:

THIS PREVIOUSLY NOTICED ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 24, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Hearing to consider a request to approve a Planned Development (PD) 25-001, Subdivision (SUB) 20-004, and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 to allow a two- story, attached, 13-unit multi-family, townhome-style development located at 3541 East Avenue.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council:
1 .

Adopt a resolution finding the project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15332, In-Fill Projects, and Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with the provisions of CEQA, subject to project approval;
2 .

Adopt a resolution approving Subdivision (SUB) 20-004 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21- 001 for the development located at 3541 East Avenue; and 3 .

Introduce an ordinance
and waive the first reading authorizing Planned Development (PD) 25- 001.

DECISION TYPE
Legislative

SUMMARY
The applicant proposes to demolish an existing single-family home and develop the approximately 0.62- acre site with 13 attached two-story townhouse style units and one attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The project will consist of all rental units that would be grouped on one lot. The project will include one unit for rent to a very low-income (50 percent of Area Median Income) household consistent with the City's inclusionary affordable housing policies.

The project site is located at the southeast corner of East Avenue and Dolores Street (see Attachment 3 168
- Location Map). The project provides two garage parking spaces per unit and four uncovered onsite guest spaces, including one van-accessible space. Approximately 50 percent of the on-site landscaping will include California native plants with a total of 22 trees planted around the site.

The proposed project includes the following entitlements:

Planned Development (PD) 25-001 would establish new residential development standards based on the T4 Neighborhood (T4N) and replace the existing default Planned Development zone.

Subdivision (SUB) 20-004 (Tentative Parcel Map 11527) would merge the existing two parcels into one parcel and secure public improvements, including a $50,000 contribution for intersection improvements.

Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 would ensure the architecture and landscape design of the project complies with the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG).

DISCUSSION

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT

The site is surrounded by existing residential development, including single-family development to the east and west, multi-family to the south, and a mix of single and multi-family residential to the north. The applicant proposes to combine the two parcels into one single parcel. The project site is approximately one mile away from Downtown Livermore, located near multiple public transit stops, and has access to public services and utilities.

The Planning Commission staff report summarizes the existing and surrounding land uses (see Attachment 1).

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND STAFF ANALYSIS

General Plan

The General Plan designation for the subject site is Urban High Residential (UH-2). The UH-2 designation allows a density range of 8 to 14 units per acre and is seen in the central and outlying areas of the City. Townhouses and duplex housing types are common under this designation. The General Plan allows residential density to be based on a district-wide basis (Livermore General Plan Land Use Element, p. 3-10). The current density of the surrounding neighborhood is 12.7 units per acre. The proposed project will increase density in this area to approximately 13 units per acre. Thus, district-wide density will remain within the permitted density range of the UH-2 designation.

Zoning

The project site is currently zoned Planned Development (PD), which requires the project adhere to default residential zoning standards or adopt a development-specific Planned Development District tailored to the site. Generally, a Planned Development District is intended for development projects that require more flexible development standards that allow the project to address site constraints in a manner that could not be achieved in a conventional zone. A Planned Development zone must conform to the requirements of the General Plan.

169
Multifamily development of 14 units or less under the PD zone is required to conform to either the Multiple Family Residential (MFR) or T4 Neighborhood (T4N) Zone, whichever is closest to the project density. The proposed project most closely aligns with the T4N Zone, making it the default zone for the project.

The proposed PD standards are compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The proposed standards maintain a cohesive transition between the existing residential neighborhood and the project site through site planning, use of setbacks and separations, design features, and landscape design. The PD prescribes precise frontage design types, setbacks, building height and width maximums for the townhome style buildings. This eliminates the possibility to expand the townhomes through building additions (building additions are uncommon for townhome projects).

The proposed PD standards differ from three T4N zoning standards. The proposed variations are described below:

The T4N zone limits building height to 35 feet within the front 90 feet of the property (measured from the East Avenue right-of-way) and to 24 feet in height beyond 90 feet. The 24-foot height limit applies to the southeast corner of unit 8 which is approximately 28 feet in height. Unit 8 exceeds the 24 foot maximum height limit at the rear of the lot. The proposed PD would allow the 35-foot height limit to extend back to accommodate the height of unit 8.

The project includes porches and stoops which are a required frontage type in the T4N zone. The porches are required to provide a minimum depth of eight feet. The T4N zone allows a maximum encroachment of five feet into the setback for a porch or a stoop. The second variation would allow the proposed porches along Dolores Street and East Avenue to encroach eight feet into the setback. The encroachment will allow the project to meet the minimum porch depth and provide usable private open space.

The Townhouse Building Type (LDC section 5.01.090) limits the width of the main building body for each unit to 36 feet. Units 1 through 12 comply with this standard but Unit 13, which includes an ADU, is 44 feet wide and exceeds the maximum allowed building width. The third variation removes the unit width limitation.

Staff supports the requested variations. The rectangularly shaped corner lot makes it difficult to construct a building at the rear of the lot and comply with the T4N rear lot height standard. Furthermore, the southern edge of the property adjoins landscape and a private circulation driveway for the residential community to the south.

An eight-foot encroachment into the setback is desirable along Dolores Street and East Avenue to meet the minimum porch depth requirement per the Development Code (LDC section 4.03.050). The encroachments allow each street-facing unit to have a usable porch. The porches also add detailing and human scale to the architecture while maintaining a five-foot minimum setback to accommodate landscape.

The excess building width for unit 13 allows the construction of an ADU and provides additional housing.

The PD allows development flexibility and permits the requested variations.

Additional Design Features
170

For each proposed variation from the default zoning, the Livermore Development Code (LDC section

3.04.030.J.1) requires Residential Planned Developments to provide an added design feature that is proportional to the degree of variation from the default zoning. The City only considers a design feature that exceeds what is otherwise required by the City or by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Examples include:

• Public features not generally available in the neighborhood of a standard zoning district • Provision of public, neighborhood amenities
• Diversification of building sizes and types, increased landscaping, or extraordinary architecture

SUBDIVISION

The project entitlements include a Tentative Parcel Map to combine the two individual parcels into one parcel in conformance with Part 10 of the Livermore Development Code (Government Code and the Subdivision Map Act, by reference). The purpose of the City’s subdivision ordinance is to regulate the division of land consistent with the Livermore General Plan and facilitate orderly development of the community. The applicant is the owner of both parcels. A parcel line between the two parcels will be removed to merge the lots.

The development would increase the need for public utilities that would be maintained by the City.

However, the site has access to public utilities, including water and sewer. Furthermore, the project would be required to pay for the increase in public services at the time of Building Permit issuance and through user fees.

Site access from Dolores Street was evaluated by the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department, Livermore Sanitation, and the Engineering Division for conformance with the applicable standards and deemed adequate to maintain health and safety.

The East Avenue Corridor Project and the Active Transportation Plan (ATP) describe the future improvements to the intersection of East Avenue and Dolores Street, including bulb-outs and medians, permanent traffic-calming measures, and bike and pedestrian improvements. In accordance with the ATP, these improvements are installed in conjunction with development projects. The applicant will contribute $50,000 towards these improvements representing its fair share of the improvements required by the East Avenue Corridor Project, which contribution will be due prior to Final Map approval. This figure is based on the project's linear foot frontage to the East Avenue Corridor Project, which in total is estimated to cost $3.45 million.

SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW

Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 evaluates the development’s site layout, building architecture, and landscape design. The site plan uses the site efficiently and creates an active 171
streetscape that relates well to the pedestrian walkways and adjacent buildings. The development includes two main buildings oriented to provide appropriate spacing and positioning to promote pedestrian connectivity, maintain privacy and use the site efficiently. The building facing Dolores Street displays strong design character and is visually compatible with the existing development to the south.

The characteristics of the development such as height, massing, setbacks, materials, and architectural style improve and complement the surrounding area. The project design enhances the views for the public from East Avenue and Dolores Street. Units 1 through 8 have access to usable private open space in their back yards along the eastern edge of the site. Units 9 through 13 have front yards and usable front porches. The individual garages are accessed by a common drive aisle located behind the residential structures that face the public street. This achieves the Design Guidelines goal of minimizing views of garages (DSG, Residential Standards, p.128).

The proposed architecture and materials reflect traditional architecture prevalent in the older sections of Livermore, south of downtown. Materials include traditional horizontal lap siding and stucco, wood posts, and a combination of stone and brick wainscoting. The building forms employ a variation of façade articulation to distinguish the attached dwelling units from one and other. In addition, the architecture wraps façade treatments to the street facing sides of the buildings which creates an inviting presence.

The project includes appropriate site planning, building massing, vertical and horizontal articulation, the use of conventional elements and materials, and neutral color palettes that are consistent with the Residential Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG pgs. 129 -130, 133, 140).

The landscape design creates an inviting streetscape that enhances the neighborhood. The landscape plan provides a hierarchy of plantings with a variety of low to medium water usage trees, shrubs and groundcover consistent with the Design Standards and Guidelines and the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Two existing trees at the northwest corner of the site will be removed and approximately 22 trees of various species would be distributed throughout the development. Approximately 50% of the plant material is native to California.

Parking and Traffic

Parking is provided in attached garages consistent with the Livermore Development Code (Chapter 4.04:

Parking Standards) at a ratio of two required parking spaces per unit, plus one guest space for every four units. The project provides three guest spaces near the driveway entrance and one van-accessible ADA space at the end of the drive aisle. A condition of approval would require a red curb and installation of a "No Parking" sign along Dolores Street to allow future traffic calming improvements.

TJKM Consultants prepared a transportation assessment for the project (see Attachment 6). The assessment includes a trip generation and vehicles miles traveled (VMT) analysis in addition to an on- site circulation and access evaluation. The assessment concludes that the project will generate 88 average daily trips during a typical weekday which is below the VMT screening threshold of 110 daily trips. Therefore, the project does not require a VMT analysis. The project will generate 6 trips in the morning peak hours between 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 7 trips in the evening peak hours of 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Additionally, the assessment concludes the on-site circulation and site access is adequate for the project.

Public Art

172
Pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 12.51, residential development projects are required to provide (or fund) public art in a manner that benefits the public and contributes to the public’s understanding, enjoyment and experience of cultural diversity. The applicant proposes to pay the in-lieu fee established by the Municipal Code to satisfy the public art requirement.

Solid Waste

Each unit will have containers for trash, recycling, and green waste. Each unit has an attached garage where the containers will be stored. The containers will be collected from the internal drive aisle.

Livermore Sanitation reviewed and approved the site layout.

Affordable Housing

The applicant proposes to rent all 13 units in the development. The applicant would be required to enter into an affordable housing agreement that will be recorded on the property. The agreement will identify one unit as affordable to a very low-income household (50 percent of Area Median Income).

ENVIORNMENTAL DETERMINATION

Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines exempts in-fill development projects in urbanized areas. The exemption applies to the proposed project. Additional analysis is provided in the Planning Commission staff report (see Attachment 1).

PLANNING COMMISSION

On June 17, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project and recommended approval to the City Council with a 4-1 vote. No public comments were received at the meeting.

During the meeting, the Commission discussed a recommendation to require dedication of right-of-way (ROW) along the project frontage on East Avenue to accommodate a future bike lane as part of the Active Transportation Plan (ATP). However, the ATP has not established a project-level design to identify specific ROW needs for bike lane construction on East Avenue. Consequently, the City does not have a nexus to require the dedication. Right-of-way dedications are typically guided by an adopted implementation plan; however, the East Avenue Corridor Study does not yet have an implementation plan for on-street bicycle lanes.

Staff is currently evaluating multiple options for installing bike lanes on East Avenue as part of the East Avenue Corridor Study. Public outreach conducted during the study revealed no community consensus on a preferred design. The outreach process did not include ROW acquisition as an option. Additionally, requiring ROW from the project would further impact building placement, proposed porch setbacks resulting in the removal of a significant amount of landscaping, and could negatively affect the pedestrian environment.

Implementation of the first phase of the
East Avenue Corridor ATP Implementation, (CIP TB202222 - Pedestrian Bulb Outs & Bike Boulevard Improvements) includes bike and pedestrian improvements at key intersections based on the pilot project, and implementation of a bike boulevard that traverses east and west in the neighborhoods north of East Avenue. The intersection improvements and bike boulevard are scheduled to start construction in summer 2026.

The ATP is expected to be updated following
173
completion of the General Plan.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Staff received three public comments for the project (see Attachment 7).

FISCAL IMPACTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS

Staff time allocated to land use entitlement review are offset by required entitlement application fees. The incremental increase in demand for water, sewer, and stormwater services will be offset by required impact fees and utility connection fees. Consistent with Livermore’s practice, onsite water and sewer lines would be maintained by the City and Cal Water, which would be covered by user fees. In addition, the project will contribute $50,000 towards future intersection improvements at East Avenue and Dolores Street. The project, therefore, will have no significant fiscal or administrative impacts.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

1: A Safe Community that Thrives

GOAL
:

9: Facilitate new development consistent with the City’s General Plan.

GUIDING DOCUMENTS
:

Livermore General Plan, Livermore Development Code, and Design Standards and Guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Planning Commission Staff Report

2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes

3. Location Map

4. Development Plans

5. Colors and Materials Board

6. Traffic Assessment

7. Public Comments

8. Resolution - CEQA

9. Exhibit A - Planning Commission CEQA Resolution

10. Resolution - Project

11. Exhibit A - Planning Commission Project Resolution

12. Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval

13. Ordinance

14. Exhibit A - Planning Commission PD Resolution

15. Exhibit B - Planned Development (PD) 25-001

174
Prepared by: Kam Purewal
Associate Planner

Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
175
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.1
DATE: June 17, 2025
TO: Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Steve Riley, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Hearing to consider a request to approve a Planned Development (PD) 25-001, Subdivision (SUB) 20-004, and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 to allow a two- story, attached, 13-unit multi-family, townhome-style development. The project will consist of all rental units that would be grouped on one lot. The units will consist of either three or four bedrooms and range in size from 1,400 to 1,900 square feet per unit. Each unit will have an attached two-car garage. The project will reconstruct the curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the project frontages (East Avenue and Dolores Street), underground all utilities, and construct a new shared driveway to access the site from Dolores Street.

ECOMMENDED ACTION
S
taff recommends the Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending the City Council:

1. Find the project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15332, In-Fill Projects, and Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with the provisions of CEQA, subject to project approval; and

2. Approve Subdivision (SUB) 20-004 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001; and

3. Adopt an Ordinance authorizing Planned Development (PD) 25-001

DECISION TYPE
S
UMMARY
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing single-family home and develop the approximately 0.62- acre site with 13 attached two-story townhouse units and one attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU).

The project will consist of all rental units that would be grouped on one lot. The proposal includes a traditional architectural style adapted to the townhome product type. Unit sizes range from approximately 1,400 square feet to approximately 1,900 square feet with the option of three or four bedrooms. Each unit will have an attached two-car garage. The project will include one unit for rent to a very low-income (50% of Area Median Income) household.

The project site is located at the southeast corner of East Avenue and Dolores Street (see Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1
176
- Location Map). Four guest parking spaces, including one accessible space, would be located on-site.

Approximately 50 percent of the on-site landscaping will include California native plants with a total of 22 trees planted around the site including a variety of shrubs, grasses, perennials, succulents, and subshrubs.

The applicant will reconstruct the curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the project frontages (East Avenue and Dolores Street), construct a new driveway to provide access to the site from Dolores Street, and underground all electric and communication lines along the project frontage.

The applicant has agreed to contribute $50,000 towards intersection improvements at East Avenue and Dolores Street. The Engineering Division is working on multiple active and planned Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) along East Avenue. The contribution could be used for corridor improvements such as permanent traffic calming measures or bike and pedestrian enhancements. The improvements will be completed at a later date as part of a CIP.

The proposed project includes the following entitlements:

Planned Development - Residential (PD) 25-001 would establish new residential development standards based on the T4 Neighborhood (T4N) and replace the existing default Planned Development zone.

Subdivision (SUB) 20-004 (Tentative Parcel Map 11527) would merge the existing two parcels into one parcel, establish property lines and site layout, and secure associated public improvements.

Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 would ensure the architecture and landscape design of the project complies with the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG).

DISCUSSION

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT

The project site is generally flat and consists of two legal parcels. The applicant proposes to combine the two parcels into one single parcel. An existing single-family home is located on the property including several recreational vehicles and a storage container. The existing house will be demolished, and the recreation vehicles and storage container will be removed from the site.

The site is surrounded by existing residential development, including single-family development to the east and west, multi-family to the south, and a mix of single and multi-family residential to the north. The project site is approximately one mile away from Downtown Livermore, located near multiple public transit stops, and has access to public services and utilities. Table 1: summarizes the existing and surrounding land uses.

Table 1
General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation Existing Land Use
North Urban High Residential
(UH-2)
Suburban Multiple
Residential (RG) Zone
Single/ Multifamily
Residential
ATTACHMENT 1
177
South
Urban High Residential
(UH-2)
Planned Unit
Development (PUD) 116-
78 Multifamily Residential
East Urban High Residential
(UH-2)
Planned Development
(PD) Single Family Residential
West Urban Medium High
Residential (UMH)
Residential Low Density
(RL) Zone Single Family Residential
Subject Site
Urban High Residential
(UH-2)
Planned Development
(PD) Single Family Residential

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND STAFF ANALYSIS

General Plan

The General Plan designation for the subject site is Urban High Residential (UH-2). The Urban High Residential designation accommodates the highest range of residential densities in the City. It allows a density range of 8 to 14 units per acre and is seen in the central and outlying areas of the City.

Townhouses and duplex housing types are common under this designation. The General Plan allows residential density to be based on a district-wide basis (Livermore General Plan Land Use Element, p. 3- 10). The current density of the surrounding neighborhood is 12.7 units per acre. The proposed project will increase density in this area to approximately 13 units per acre. Thus, district-wide density will remain within the permitted density range of the UH-2 designation.

Zoning

Multifamily development of 14 units or less under the PD zone is required to conform to either the Multiple Family Residential (MFR) or T4 Neighborhood (T4N) Zone, whichever is closest to the project density. The proposed project most closely aligns with the T4N Zone, making it the default zone for the project.

The proposed PD standards for the project are compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and conform to the size and shape of the site. The proposed standards maintain a cohesive transition between the existing residential neighborhood and the project site through site planning, use of setbacks and separations, design features, and landscape design. The PD prescribes precise frontage design types, setbacks, and building height and width maximums for the townhome style buildings. This eliminates the possibility to expand the townhomes through building additions (building additions are uncommon for townhome projects).

The proposed PD standards differ from three T4N zoning standards. The proposed variations are described below:

ATTACHMENT 1
178

1. The T4N zone limits building height to 35 feet within the front 90 feet of the property (measured from the East Avenue right-of-way) and to 24 feet in height beyond 90 feet. The 24-foot height limit applies to the southeast corner of unit 8 which is approximately 28' in height. Unit 8 exceeds the 24 foot maximum height limit at the rear of the lot. The proposed PD would allow the 35-foot height limit to extend back to accommodate the additional building height but complies with the overall maximum height limit of 35 feet to accommodate unit 8.

2. The project includes porches and stoops which are a required frontage type in the T4N zone. The T4N zone allows a maximum encroachment of 5 feet into the required setback for a porch or a stoop. The second variation would allow the proposed porches along Dolores Street and East Ave to encroach 8 feet into the setback. The encroachment will allow the project to meet the required minimum porch depth of 8 feet and provide usable yard and open space within the required setback. All porches will maintain the minimum required setback of five feet.

3. The Townhouse Building Type (LDC 5.01.090) limits the width of the main building body for each unit to 36 feet. Units 1 through 12 comply with this standard but Units 13, which includes an ADU, is 44 feet wide and exceeds the maximum allowed building width. The third variation removes the unit width requirement.

An eight-foot encroachment into the setback is desirable along Dolores Street and East Avenue to meet the minimum porch depth requirement per the Development Code (LDC 4.03.050). The encroachments allow each street-facing unit to have a usable porch. The porches also add detailing and human scale to the architecture while maintaining a five-foot minimum setback to accommodate landscape.

The excess building width for unit 13 allows the construction of an ADU and provides additional housing.

The PD allows development flexibility and permits the requested variations. The following standards apply to this project:

Allowed in T4N
Zoning Proposed Complies with
T4N Zone
Front Setback (East Ave) 15' min.
30' max. 15' Yes
Street Side (Dolores St.) 10' min.
15' max. 13' Yes
Building Height
35' max.
24' max, 1.5
stories beyond 90
ft of front property
line
28' overall, two stories
No - Unit 8
exceeds the 24'
max, but
proposed PD will
allow up to 35
feet to address
this issue.

ATTACHMENT 1
179
Building Width (per unit) 18' min.
36' max
(Units 1 to 8)
width 23'
(Units 9 to 12)
width 28'-8"
(Unit 13)
width 44'
(includes
ADU)
Units 1 through
12 do comply.

No - Unit 13
exceeds the max
width, but
proposed PD will
allow up to 44' to
address this
issue.

Open Space/ Yard Area (per unit)
100 sf/ unit min.
(Unit 1)
173 sf open
space in rear
yard; front
porch area
166 sf
(Units 2 to 7)
open space
173 sf in rear
yard;
(Unit 8)
462 sf yard/
porch area
within side
street
setback;
(Unit 9)
240 sf yard/
porch area
within side
street
setback;
(Units 10 to 12)
115 sf yard/
porch area
within side
street setback
(Unit 13)
110 sf yard/
porch area
(ADU) 104 sf
open space
area
Yes

For each proposed variation from the default zoning, the Livermore Development Code (LDC

ATTACHMENT 1
180

The proposed project meets the Planned Development design feature requirements. The project includes increased landscaping on-site of which approximately 50% are native to California. The proposed architecture is of high quality and incorporates design features as recommended by the Design Standards and Guidelines. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to provide a monetary contribution of $50,000 for intersection improvements for the benefit of the public.

SUBDIVISION

The project entitlements include a Tentative Parcel Map to combine the two individual parcels into one parcel in conformance with Part 10 of the Livermore Development Code (and Government Code and the Subdivision Map Act, by reference). The purpose of the City’s subdivision ordinance is to regulate the division of land consistent with the Livermore General Plan and facilitate orderly development of the community. The applicant is the owner of both parcels. A parcel line between the two parcels will be removed to merge the lot.

The lot layout and configuration establish the footprint size of the two buildings and enable clustering consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District. The project has access to public utilities including water and sewer. The development would increase the need for public utilities that would be maintained by the City. The project would be required to pay for the increase in public services at the time of Building Permit issuance and through user fees. Site Access (ingress and egress) from Dolores Street was evaluated by the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department, Livermore Sanitation, and the Engineering Division for conformance with the applicable standards and deemed adequate to maintain health and safety.

SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW

Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR) 21-001 proposes the development’s site layout, landscape design, and building architecture.

Site Plan

The site plan establishes efficient building orientation and logically relates to the street, pedestrian walkways, and adjacent buildings. The development includes two main buildings oriented to provide appropriate spacing and positioning to promote pedestrian connectivity, maintain privacy and use the site efficiently. The building facing Dolores Street displays strong design character and is visually compatible with the existing development to the south. The characteristics of the development such as height, massing, setbacks, materials and architectural style improve and complement the surrounding area. The project design enhances the views for the public from East Avenue and Dolores Street.

Units 1 through 8 have access to usable private open space in their back yards along the eastern edge of the site. Units 9 through 13 have front yards and usable front porches. The Design Standard and Guidelines (p.128) encourage small-lot development building entries to be located on the front facade and have direct access to a sidewalk. The project meets the intent of this standard with porches and ATTACHMENT 1
181
entries facing a public street.

The individual garages are accessed by a common drive aisle located behind the residential structures that face the public street. This achieves the Design Guidelines goal of minimizing views of garages (DSG, Residential Standards, p.128). The proposed site plan achieves the following overall goals for residential design set forth in the Livermore Residential Design Standards and Guidelines (p.120):

Provide high quality housing for all sectors of the housing market

Response: The project provides high quality townhome-style rental units with floor plans and sizes that will diversify the mix of housing types and densities of the surrounding area and accommodate the diverse demands of the housing market.

Decrease the visual prominence of the automobile and related facilities, such as streets and parking areas, in residential neighborhoods.

Response: The project provides attached garages for each unit that are accessed via a shared drive aisle. The internal drive aisle is located behind the row of townhomes fronting along Dolores Street.

Encourage a harmonious development pattern that respects and responds to the character of the surrounding built and natural environments

Response: The development would be appropriately setback from the existing residential developments to the east and south.

Architecture

The proposed architecture and materials reflect traditional architecture prevalent in the older sections of Livermore, south of downtown. They include cross-gabled roof forms and individual porch elements for each unit. Materials include traditional horizontal lap siding and stucco, wood posts, and a combination of stone and brick wainscoting. All doors and windows are wrapped in wood trim which gives them a shadowed, recessed definition. Finally, gabled façades are further detailed with faux vents and knee braces. The building forms employ a variation of façade articulation to distinguish the attached dwelling units from one and other. In addition, the architecture wraps façade treatments to the street facing sides of the buildings which creates an inviting presence. These architectural features and the articulation reduce the massing and create a human scale. The project includes appropriate site planning, building massing, vertical and horizontal articulation, the use of conventional elements and materials, and neutral color palettes that conform with the Residential Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG pgs. 129 -130, 133, 140):

Guidelines C.1.1.2. Building massing should be varied by employing a variety of techniques, such as recessed porches, bay windows, dormers and varying planes or setbacks. As appropriate to the style of the house, the roof forms should be varied. Roof forms to be employed include hipped roofs, gabled roofs, varying roof pitches, side-to-side gables, front-to-back gables or various combinations.

ATTACHMENT 1
182
Guideline C.1.1.3. Façade components should correspond to the scale of the human form. This is accomplished by visually breaking up façades into smaller components with elements such as windows, wall insets, balconies, ledges and trim and by stepping back upper stories.

Standard C.3.1.1. Façades shall be designed to include entries, porches and other architectural elements that relate to the human scale.

Standard C.8.1.1 The form, color and texture of the roof should be an integral part of the building design and compatible with both the natural and built settings.

Standard C.8.1.2 Roofline variations may be used to demarcate primary building entrances.

Building fronts and entrances break down the mass of the structure consistent with the Design Standards and Guidelines. Windows are generally vertical and related in design, recessed or framed, to add relief and further articulate the wall plane.

Standard C.4.1.2 Windows shall be used as architectural elements that add relief to the façade and wall surface.

Guideline C.4.1.5 Windows should be vertically oriented, in order to relate to the human form, unless horizontal windows are appropriate to the style, or are necessary in the particular application.

Standard C.1.2.8 Accentuating the ground floor of the building by making it thicker or more substantial visually than upper stories.

The project style utilizes a distinct and a varied palette of materials including brick, stone, stucco, and lap siding. The proposed colors vary in tone, ranging from light, medium and darker earth tones. The color scheme is compatible with each other and the project setting in conformance with the City’s Design Guidelines (DSG p140):

Guideline C.7.1.1. Exterior building colors should be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood setting and should be in keeping with the geographic and climatic conditions specific to Livermore.

Guideline C.7.1.2. Accent colors should be used to enhance details such as trim.

Front Porches

In the Transect Zones, the townhouse building type is required to have either a porch or stoop frontage treatment. The project provides porches on all street-facing units and stoops on all units that face the internal driveway. The front porches comply with the required frontage standards. The PD provides flexibility by allowing an eight-foot encroachment into the setback to comply with the required minimum width and depth for porches.

Parking and Traffic

Parking is provided in attached garages consistent with the Livermore Development Code (Chapter 4.04:

ATTACHMENT 1
183
Parking Standards) at a ratio of two required parking spaces per unit, plus one guest space for every four units for multiple family residential projects. The project provides two stalls per unit for a total of 26 spaces (the total minimum required). The project provides three guest spaces near the driveway entrance and one van-accessible ADA space at the end of the drive aisle. A condition of approval would require a red curb and installation of a "No Parking" sign along Dolores Street to allow future traffic calming improvements.

TJKM Consultants prepared a transportation assessment for the project (see Attachment 4). The assessment includes a trip generation and vehicles miles traveled (VMT) analysis in addition to an on- site circulation and access evaluation. The assessment concludes that the project will generate 88 average daily trips during a typical weekday which is below the VMT screening threshold of 110 daily trips. Therefore, the project does not require a VMT analysis. The project will generate 6 trips in the morning peak hours between 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 7 trips in the evening peak hours of 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Additionally, the assessment concludes the on-site circulation and site access is adequate for the project.

Landscape

The landscape design creates an inviting presence and includes elements that contribute positively to the neighborhood. The landscape plan provides a hierarchy of plantings with a variety of low to medium water usage trees, shrubs and groundcover consistent with the Design Standards and Guidelines. Two existing tree at the corner of the intersection will be removed and approximately 22 trees of various species would be distributed throughout the development including: red maple, western redbud, desert willow, Catalina ironwood, and dwarf Italian cypress. Shrubs, grasses, and groundcovers include a variety of manzanita, sage, moor grass, and westringia. Most of the proposed plant palette consists of low or medium water usage species consistent with the Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance (Livermore Municipal Code 13.25).

The proposed street trees will be Red Maple and Catalina Ironwood on East Avenue and Ginkgo Tree on Dolores Street. These trees provide shade and are appropriate as street trees with a broad canopy range between 20-35 feet. Per the Design Standards and Guidelines (section 6.D.1.4.1.b) the street trees will be minimum 24-inch box.

Public Art

Pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 12.51, residential development projects are required to provide public art in a manner that benefits the public and contributes to the public’s understanding, enjoyment and experience of cultural diversity. Typically, development projects are encouraged to integrate art into the site plan and landscape design. At this time the applicant is proposing to pay the in- lieu fee established by the Municipal Code to satisfy the public art requirement. In-Lieu Fees are used by the Arts Commission to contract, design, and install various forms of art across the city in prominent locations for the broader community to enjoy.

Solid Waste

ATTACHMENT 1
184
Livermore Sanitation reviewed and approved the site layout.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

a. If the developer owns and rents all units in the project, then one (1) unit shall be reserved for rent to a very low-income (50% of Area Median Income) household at the City’s affordable rent limit for that unit, subject to the City’s marketing, leasing and property management requirements for Below Market Rate rentals.
b. The affordability restrictions will be secured through a regulatory agreement between the City and the developer recorded on the property.
c. If any of the units in the project are sold or transferred, then the project will be subject to the City’s for-sale affordability requirement of 1.95 units. One unit shall be restricted for sale to a low-income (80% of Area Median Income) household at the City’s affordable for-sale price and the remaining fractional unit (.95) shall be paid through the in-lieu fee per the Affordable Housing Ordinance

ENVIORNMENTAL DETERMINATION

Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines exempts in-fill development projects in urbanized areas if they meet certain requirements. In-fill projects that are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning requirements and have less than significant environmental impacts are eligible for this exemption. The exemption applies to projects meeting the following conditions.

1. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

2. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

3. The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality

5. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The proposed project meets the identified criteria above. It is consistent with the General Plan designation with regard to the use and intensity of the proposed development, compliant with the Development Code, and Design Standards and Guidelines. The development site is located within the City limits on an approximately 0.62-acre site that is surrounded by residential uses and has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The project is not expected to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. All public utilities would be modified to serve the proposed development. The City has not identified any constraints that would limit utility service for the project. Emergency responders and solid waste haulers have confirmed that the site is physically suitable for emergency access and provision of public services. All necessary utility services can be accommodated in the project design.

ATTACHMENT 1
185

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location Map

2. Development Plans

3. Colors and Materials Board

4. Traffic Assessment

5. Resolution - CEQA

6. Resolution - Planned Development

7. Exhibit A - Planned Development - (PD) 25-001

8. Resolution - Project

9. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval

Prepared by: Kam Purewal
Associate Planner

ATTACHMENT 1
186
JUNE 17, 2025 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION
P

LANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 17, 2025
________________________________________________________________

REGULAR MEETING
1 . CALL TO ORDER – The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Yolanda Fintschenko at 7:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

RO
LL CALL – Present: Chairperson Yolanda Fintschenko, Vice Chairperson Tracy Kronzak, and Commissioner Jacob Anderson, Commissioner Nadine Horner, Commissioner Charity Steele.

LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chai
rperson Fintschenko led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2 . OPEN FORUM
C
hairperson Fintschenko opened the public comment period.

T
here were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed. 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER ANDERSON, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR KRONZAK AND CARRIED ON A 5- 0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
3 .1 Approval of the June 3, 2025, Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes. 4 . P ROJECT REVIEW – NONE

5. P

UBLIC HEARINGS
5 .1 Hearing to consider a request to approve a Planned Development (PD) 25- 001, Subdivision (SUB) 20-004, and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21- 001 to allow a two- story, attached, 13- unit multi- family, townhome -style development. The project will consist of all rental units that would be grouped on one lot. The units will consist of either three or four bedrooms and range in size from 1,400 to 1,900 square feet per unit. Each unit will have an attached two -car garage. The project will reconstruct the curb, ATTACHMENT 2
187

PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JUNE 17, 2025

gutter, and sidewalk along the project frontages (East Avenue and Dolores Street), underground all utilities, and construct a new shared driveway to access the site from Dolores Street.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending the City Council:

1. Find the project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15332, In -Fill Projects, and Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with the provisions of CEQA, subject to project approval; and

2. Approve Subdivision (SUB) 20-004 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21-001; and

3. Adopt an Ordinance authorizing Planned Development (PD) 25-001.

Associate Planner Purewal presented the staff report.

Terry Townsend, architect on behalf of the property owner , provided an overview of the proposed project.

In response to Commissioner Anderson, Mr. Pur ewal indicated the LA VTA bus stop would not be modified. Mr. Townsend explained the reason for east facing solar panels.

In response to Vice Chair Kronzak, Mr. Townsend confirmed that the units would be rentals. Mr. Purewal explained the original proposal for single family homes.

In response Commissioner Anderson, Senior Civil Engineer Salgado indicated staff felt the existing right of way could accommodate the ATP requirements and discussed options of eliminating parking or a lane. Commissioner Anderson expressed concern about the ability to meet the ATP goals.

Chairperson Fintschenko confirmed that, since the East Avenue Corridor Study was not complete, standards on the intersection could not be enforced.

Commissioner Horner suggested the motion include wording to ensure the bike lanes would be considered.

Vice Chair Kronzak confirmed that conditions could not be applied to the project because the East Avenue Study was not yet complete and also confirmed the cumulative impact on parking.

Chairperson Fintschenko indicated opposition to the friendly amendment due to the Study not being completed.

ATTACHMENT 2
188

JUNE 17, 2025 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

Commissioner Horner commented on the successfully proposed infill development.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER HORNER, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR KRONZAK AND CARRIED ON A 4-1 VOTE, WITH COMMISSIONER

ANDERSON VOTING NO, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 22-25 Recommending the City Council find that the project is exempt under CEQA guidelines section 15332 (In- Fill Project) and direct the planning manager to file a notice of exemption for the project

Resolution 23-25 Recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Planned Development (PD) 25-001

Resolution 24-25 Recommending the City Council approve Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 21 -001 and Subdivision (SUB) 20- 004 (Tentative Parcel Map 11527)

5.2 Hearing to consider a request for the second amendment to Development Agreement 18- 001 to revise the terms and timing of the off -site improvements including a public trail and public sewer line. The Development Agreement vests a previously approved project for 186 two- and three-story townhomes on a vacant 35-acre site located at the terminus of Lassen Road northwest of the First Street/I-580 Interchange and north of I-580.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt resolutions:

1. Recommending the City Council find that the environmental impacts of the Second Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Lassen Road Townhome Project are within the scope of the 2020 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Active Transportation Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Springtown Trunkline Sewer Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration;

2. Recommending the City Council direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to project approval; and

3. Recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Development

Assistant Planner Emily LaDue presented the staff report.

Commissioner Anderson requested staff ensure quality bike lane connections to the trail.

ATTACHMENT 2
189

PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JUNE 17, 2025

ON THE MOTION OF VICE CHAIR KRONZAK, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 25-25 Recommending the City Council find that the Environmental Impacts of the Second Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Lassen Road Townhome Project are within the scope of the 2020 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, t he Active Transportation Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Springtown Trunkline Sewer Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration

Resolution 26-25 Recommending approval of Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 25-001

6. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION – NONE

7. MATTERS INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF

Commissioner Anderson requested the website and social media outlets be updated regarding Downtown development and suggested a webpage for the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan.

Vice Chair Kronzak concurred with the addition of information on the Isabel Neighborhood.

8. ADJOURNMENT – at 8:00 pm to a Regular Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, July 1 , 2025 at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ATTACHMENT 2
190
City of Livermore
This map is based on City of Livermore GIS
Information and reflects the most current information
at the time of this printing. The map is intended for
reference purposes only and the City and its staff is
not responsible for errors.
1,000Livermore IT, GIS Services
166.7
1:NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US

83.33 Feet166.70
6/3/2025 9:54:43
AM
Prepared:

Notes:

Scale:

ATTACHMENT 3
191
ATTACHMENT 4
192
Dolores Street
ATTACHMENT 4
193
East Avenue
ATTACHMENT 4
194
ATTACHMENT 4
195
ATTACHMENT 4
196
ATTACHMENT 4
197
ATTACHMENT 4
198
ATTACHMENT 4
199
ATTACHMENT 4
200
ATTACHMENT 4
201
ATTACHMENT 4
202
ATTACHMENT 4
203
ATTACHMENT 4
204
North Side Bevatlon
IEos1 A"""" Sldel
West Bevatlon fAuto Cou1 Sldel
East Bevatlon
CCM'O!rOONSl-tGLEROCF
South Side Bevatlon
COM'OOOClN Sl-ltaE ROCF
I� Terry J. Townsend
• Architect •
147 Old Bernal Ave., StJte 6
Pleo&Onton, CA 94566
w
Tel 925-464-5438
Notes:

Frank Abboud
APN: 98A-610-1
3541 East Avenue
Llvennore, Cctfomlo
�=
0 ll 16 24
SC>l.EVll ... :l'--0"
Rev I D&sc,.,tlon Dote
I.kilts 1-8
Exterior Elevations
Job N,..mber. __ �200=12=6 Sh-t:

Scde: V8"=T-O"
°"'""·----��
Check,ou+�--�T�""Y� 11
Dote-: HS-2J Of __ V __
ATTACHMENT 4
205
North Side Bevatlon
IEos1 A"""" Stdel
West Bevatlon
IDoloret S-t Stdel
East Bevatlon
!Auto Cout Stdel
COM'OOOClN Sl-H:,LE ROCF
CCM'O!rOONSl-tGLEROCF
South Side Bevatlon
wooo""
sru:co
fW<>Erot<>
I� Terry J. Townsend
• Architect •
147 Old Bernal Ave., StJte 6
Pleo&Onton, CA 94566
w Tel 925-464-5438
Notes:

Frank Abboud
APN: 98A-610-1
3541 East Avenue
Llvennore, Cctfomlo
�=
0 ll 16 24
SC>l.EVll ... :l'--O"
Rev I D&sc,.,tlon Dote
Units 9-13
Exterior Elevations
Job N,..mber. __ �200=12=6 Sh-t:

Scde: V8"=T-O"
°"'""·----��
Check,ou+�--�T�""Y�
12 Dote-: HS-2J Of __ V __
ATTACHMENT 4
206
ATTACHMENT 4
207
ATTACHMENT 4
208

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)
SHEET INDEX:

L-0 COVER SHEET
L-1 LAYOUT PLAN
L-2 PLANTING PLAN
L-3 PLANTING NOTES
L-4 IRRIGATION PLAN
L-5 IRRIGATION NOTES

AND LEGENDS

LOCATION MAP
SITE

LANDSCAPEE PLANS

TOWNHOUSEE DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVEE LIVERMORE,, CA

COVER SHEET
L-0

THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BE

FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE JOB. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH

CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OBSTRUCTIONS,

UTILITIES, LANDSCAPE GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR LANDSCAPE AREA

DISCREPANCIES OCCUR ON SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REPRESENTED ON THE DESIGN. SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER. THE CONTRACTOR

SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION.

II HAVEE COMPLIEDD WITHH THEE MODELL WATERR EFFICIENTT LANDSCAPEE ORDINANCEE CRITERIAA ANDD APPLIEDD THEMM FORR THEE EFFICIENTT USEE OFF WATERR INN THEE LANDSCAPEE ANDD IRRIGATIONN DESIGNN PLAN.

BY:______________________________________________________________________________________________DATE:________________________ LICENSEE NUMBERR CAA 4717
SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT:

THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO

OBTAIN A SOILS ANALYSIS FROM AN APPROVED

LAB TO INDICATE WHAT AMENDMENTS WOULD BE

APPROPRIATE TO ADD TO THE SOIL PREPERATION
REGIME. TESTS SHOULD ANALYZE SOIL FERTILITY,

HORTICULTURAL SUITABILITY, AND PHYSICAL

CHARACTERISTICS AND SHOULD RECOMMEND
APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE MEASURES. SOIL TEST

SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING.

WAYPOINT ANALYTICAL
1101 WINCHESTER AVENUE,
SAN JOSE, CA.

PHONE: 408 727 0330
L A N D S C A P E N O T E S:

PRIOR TO THE CLEARING OPERATIONS, THE CONSTRACTOR SHOULD MEET WITH THE OWNER’S

REPRESENTATIVE TO DESIGNATE ALL TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN ON THE SITE AND THOSE TO BE REMOVED. NO TREES SHOULD BE REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. WHERE POSSIBLE, EXISTING TREES SHOUD BE RETAINED.

EXISTING SITE FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED WITH APPROPRIATE FENCING, STAKING, OR FLAGS.

INDIVIDUAL TREES AND SHRUBS, WHICH ARE TO REMAIN, SHOULD BE PROTECTED WITH THE PLACEMENT OF AN APPROVED BARRIER AT THE DRIP LINE END OF THE TREE.

TREE MOVING OR TRANSPLANTING SHOULD BE DONE BY AN APPROVED ARBORIST OR EXPERIENCED CONTRACTOR.

ALL NOXIOUS WEEDS AND UNWANTED VEGETATION SHOULD BE ERADICATED BY APPROVED METHODS.

ALL CLEARED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, BRUSH, VEGETATION, AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, SPECIFICATION, INSTALLATION AND WARRANTY OF ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ADEQUATE COVERAGE OF ALL AREAS WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT

COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS TO THE OWNER OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR PERMITS.

CONTRACTOR SHOULD FURNISH THE OWNER OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE WITH ACCURATE, PROPERLY DIMENSIONED, UP-TO-DATE “AS-BUILT” DRAWINGS OF ALL INSTALLATIONS OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.

UPON COMPLETION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD PHYSICALLY DEMONSTRATE TO THE OWNER OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE HOW TO SET TIME CONTROLS, ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS, AND OPERATE PUMPS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SPECIFICATION INSTALLATION AND WARRANTY OF ALL LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING SYSTEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE

OPTIMUM USAGE BY SPECIFICATION OF PROPER WIRE SIZING, ADEQUATE TRANSFORMER WATTAGE, AND PROPER CONNECTIONS.

PLANTING OPERATIONS SHOULD BE SCHEDULED TO AVOID UNNECESSARY HOLDING OF PERISHABLE PLANT MATERIALS AND AS REQUIRED TO SATISFY THE JOB SCHEDULES.

PLANTING SHOULD NOT BE DONE WHEN SOIL IS IN AN EXTREMELY WET OR MUDDY CONDITION.

PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS SHOULD BE OF SIMILAR GROWTH HABIT AND REQUIREMENTS, SIZE, TEXTURE, AND COLOR. SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE.

CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE QUALITY OF ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP OF A MINIMUM PERIOD OF 90 DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE.

OWNER SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OF MAINTENANCE UPON FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WRITTEN OPERATIONAL AND

MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ON THE SITE, ALONG WITH MANUFACTURER’S WARRANTIES.

G R A D I N G N O T E S:

ALL GRADING OPERATIONS AND PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR THE LOCAL JURISDICTION’S ENGINEER AND ARE SUBJECT TO HIS OBSERVATION.

THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE SOILS REPORT ON RECORD.

THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN AND ANDY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN.

ALL ORGANIC MATERIALS, INCLUDING GRASS & WEEDS, SHALL BE STRIPPED PRIOR TO ANY

GRADING OPERATION AND REMOVED AWAY FROM AREAS THAT ARE TO RECEIVE STRUCTURES OR ENGINEERED FILL. STRIPPING SHALL BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING, MOUNDING, AND/ OR BLENDING AND USED AS A FILL IN NON-STRUCTURAL AREAS.

GRADING SHALL BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY IF DUST AFFECTS ADJACENT PROPERTIES. SUFFICIENT WATERING TO CONTROL DUST IS REQUIRED AT ALL TIMES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBLILITY FOR CONTROL OF DUST.

ANY DAMAGE, SUCH AS COMPACTION, RUTTING, SETTLEMENT OR EROSION, CAUSED TO EXISTING

GRADES DURING THE GRADING OPERATIONS OR AS A RESULT OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS,

SHALL BE REPAIRED AND THE DAMAGED AREAS RETURNED TO THEIR ORIGINAL GRADE AND STATE OF PERMIABLILITY.

OBSTRUCTIONS INDICATED ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH WITH THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES.

NEITHER THE OWNER, MANAGER, LANDSCPAE ARCHITECT NOR ENGINEER ASSUMES

RESPONSIBLILITY THAT THE OBSTRUCTIONS INDICATED WILL ACTUALLY BE THE OBSTRUCTIONS ENCOUNTERED.

GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONTROLLED TO PREVENT NUISANCES TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE

OWNERHSIP BECOUAE OF DUST, DRAINAGE, REMOVAL OF NATURAL SUPPORT OF LAND AND STRUCTRES, ENCROACHMENT, NOISE OR VIBRATIONS.

ALL GRADING WORK AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL (SOILS) ENGINEER AND SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERALL DRAINAGE OF THE SITE AND CONTROL OF SILTATION, EROSION, AND DEBRIS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL AFFECT AND MAINTAIN PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO

PROTECT THE PROJECT SITE AND ADJACENT WATERCOURSES AND PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY

FROM DAMAGE DUE TO EROSION, FLOODING, AND DEPOSITION OF MUD OR DEBRIS ORIGINATION FROM THE SITE.

MINIMUM ONE (1) PERCENT SLOPE AND MAXIMUM THREE (3) PERCENT SLOPE FOR PAVING AREAS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DRIVEWAYS OR RAMPS AS INDICATED IN PLANS.

ALL BUILDINGS AND SITE STRUCTURES SHALL BE GRADED AND SLOPED AWAY FROM THE FOUNDATION WITH A MINIMUM SLOPE OF THREE (3) PERCENT.

ALL GRADING SHALL BE PREPARED WITH A SMOOTH, NATURAL APPEARANCE, BLENDING INTO THE ADJACENT AREAS. THERE SHOULD BE NO LARGE CLODS OF DIRT, ROCKY AREAS, UNNATURAL MOUNDS OR RIDGES AND DEBRIS OR FOREIGN MATERIAL.

G E N E R A L N O T E S:

CONTRACTORS MUST BE ACTIVELY LICENSED BY THE CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS STATE

LICENSED BOARD PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO PERFORM WORK AND MAY PERFORM ONLY SUCH WORK AS IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SAID LICENSED SPECIALTY.

CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY USA UNDERGROUND ALERT @ (800) 277-2600. CONTRACTOR

SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPELINES AND STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COST INCURRED DUE TO

DAMAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.

IF REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE OR REMOVE EXISTING ACTIVE UTILITIES ONLY AS DIRECTED. THE OWNER SHALL PAY FOR THE RELOCATION OR REMOVAL.

CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS DESIGNED

WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, AREA DISCREPANCIES AND/OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT MAY HAVE NOT BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN.

SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

OWNER, CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR CONSULTING ENGINEER. THE CONSTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION.

IF IT APPEARS THAT THE WORK TO BE DONE, OR ANY MATTER RELATIVE THERETO, IS

NOT SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED OR EXPLAINED ON THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS, THE CONSTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SUCH FURTHER EXPLANATIONS AS MAY BE REQUIRED.

IF THE CONTRACTOR REQUESTS CHANGES OF MATERIALS THAT REQUIRE CHANGES TO

THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROCESSING CHANGES THROUGH APPROPRIATE

AGENCIES, HE WILL PAY THE COST OF MODIFYING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT

CHANGES AND COST OF PROCESSING CHANCES THROUGH APPROCPRIATE AGENCIES AS NECESSARY.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH OWNER,

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, CONSULTING ENGINEER, SUBCONTRACTOR, ARCHITECT, ETC., AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. ALL PIPING, CONDUIT, SLEEVES, ETC, SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. THE PERMITS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER AND ARE TO REMAIN ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES.

CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, CODES, AND ORDINANCES OF THE STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES.

REFER TO COUNTY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE.

CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING AWARE OF ANY EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF

WAY, AND RESTRICTIONS AND WILL FOLLOW ANY RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION IN AND AROUND SUCH EASEMENTS.

PRIOR TO FINAL INSTALLATION OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ITEM, AN INSPECTION SHALL BE PERFORMED. EACH ITEM SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND/OR OWNER DURING THE FOLLOWING STAGES:
- COMPLETED COMPACTED SUBGRADE
- COMPLETED FORMS WITH STEEL IN PLACE

CONTRACTOR IS REPSONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF ANY EXISTING MATERIAL OR PROPERTY ITEM THAT IS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

ALL PROPERTY LINES AND LOT LINES SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE SURVEY, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE OWNER. SURVEY MARKERS THAT ARE DAMAGED, REMOVED, OR DESTROYED BY THE CONTRACTOR’S

OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED IN PROPER POSITION BY A CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR AT THE CONTRACTOR’S EXPENSE.

SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS, MATERIAL AND EXECUTION.

TOPOGRAPHIC AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED ONLY TO INDICATE APPROXIMATE ELEVATIONS FOR SITE ELEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR CONSULTING ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY ALL ELEVATIONS AND GRADES IN THE FIELD.

ALL MATERIALS TO BE USED OR SALVAGED SHALL BE STORED IN AN AREA DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER FOR THAT PURPOSE. ALL SALVAGED MATERIALS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER.

ALL EXISITING STRUCTURES, MATERIALS AND PLANT MATERIAL TO REMAIN WITHIN THE

NEW CONSTRUCTION AREA SHALL BE PROPERLY AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE TO THE

ORIGINAL CONDITION ANY EXISTING ITEM THAT IS DAMAGED OR DISTURBED IN ANY WAY.

ALL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES ARE TO BE STORED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDATIONS AND ARE NOT TO INCUR AN UNSAFE ENVIRONMENT.

STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND ADJACENT PROPERTY SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT

THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER.

ALL GRADING AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL (SOILS) ENGINEER AND SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS.

CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY

FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD THE OWNER, CONSTRUCTION

MANAGER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL

LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON

THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER, CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR ENGINEER.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REASONABLE CLEANLINESS OF THE PROJECT SITE DURING PERFORMACE OF THE WORK . UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED OFF THE PROPERTY. THE SITE SHOULD BE INSPECTED WITH THE OWNER FOR FINAL APPROVAL.

IF TESTING OF ANY MATERIAL IS REQUIRED, THESE TESTS SHALL BE MADE BY A QUALIFIED LAB OR PERSON. COSTS TO BE PAID BY THE OWNER UNLESS OTHER WISE AGREED UPON. MATERIALS THAT FAIL TO MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARS ARE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CORRECT MATERIALS AT THE CONTRACTOR’S EXPENSE.

A SCHEDULE OF ON-SITE INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE AGREED UPON BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. THE

SCHEDULING OF THE BUILDING INSPECTIONS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.

IF NOT SPECIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT

SAMPLES OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND RECEIVE APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

UPON FINAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE

OWNER WRITTEN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ON THE SITE ALONG WITH THE MANUFACTURER’S WARRANTIES.

SITE
ATTACHMENT 4
209

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
0 4' 8' 16' 24'

GENERAL NOTES

CONTRACTORS MUST BE PROPERLY AND

CURRENTLY LICENSED BY THE CALIFORNIA

CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSED BOARD PRIOR

TO ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO

PERFORM WORK AND MAY PERFORM ONLY

SUCH WORK AS IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SAID
LICENSED SPECIALTY.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

BEING FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES.

CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE

RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST INCURRED DUE TO

DAMAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
USA UNDERGROUND ALERT @ (800) 277-2600.

NORTH

BUS STOP TRASH
SIGN
N0°22'19"E
261.14' MON-MON
N89°38'20"W
559.97' MON-MON

EXISTING WIRE
FENCE
UNIT 1 UNIT 2
UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 UNIT 12 UNIT 13
UNIT 3 UNIT 5UNIT 4 UNIT 8UNIT 6 UNIT 7
ADU
GATE
FIRE

WOOD FENCE WOOD FENCE

D O L O R E S S T R E E T

E A S T A V E U N E
NO

PARKING

VAN ACCESSIBLE
9'-0" X 19'-0"

PAVERWALKWAY
'NARROW MODULAR' INTERLOCKING PAVERS AT APRONS AND WALKWAY BY STEPSTONE (3" X 12" X 4") (TYP) COLOR TO BE 1806ALMAOND WITH MEDIUM SANDBLAST FINISH 'NARROW MODULAR' INTERLOCKING PAVERS AT DRIVEWAY BY STEPSTONE (3" X 18" X 4") (TYP) COLOR TO BE1804 FRENCH GRAY WITH MEDIUMSANDBLAST FINISH

PAVER DRIVEWAY
WM

LAYOUT PLAN
L-1

CONCRETEWALKWAY (TYP)
NOTE

SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR

HARDSCAPE

SPECIFICATIONS, GRADING

AND DRAINAGE
ATTACHMENT 4
210

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
0 4' 8' 16' 24'

GENERAL NOTES

CONTRACTORS MUST BE PROPERLY AND

CURRENTLY LICENSED BY THE CALIFORNIA

CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSED BOARD PRIOR

TO ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO

PERFORM WORK AND MAY PERFORM ONLY

SUCH WORK AS IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SAID
LICENSED SPECIALTY.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

BEING FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES.

CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE

RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST INCURRED DUE TO

DAMAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
USA UNDERGROUND ALERT @ (800) 277-2600.

NORTH

BUS STOP TRASH
SIGN

EXISTING WIRE
FENCE
GATE
FIRE

WOOD FENCE
NO

PARKING

VAN ACCESSIBLE
9'-0" X 19'-0"
WM
17 B U X - J A P
5 G A L
2 C A R - C A L
5 G A L
12 C O N - X E R
1 G A L
16 W E S - B O X
1 G A L

PLANTING PLAN
L-2
5 E P I - E V E
1 G A L
5 C A R - C A L
5 G A L
2 A C E - A R M
24" B O X
4 G I N - G O L
24" B O X
18 B O U - B L O
1 G A L 15 S A L - B E E
1 G A L
1 C O T - R O Y
15 G A L
44 S E S - C A M
1 G A L
12 P E N - H E T
1 G A L
14 A G A - B L U
5 G A L
5 S A L - A R M
1 G A L
3 C H I - R E T
36" B O X
1 A R C - S E N
5 G A L
2 C E R - O C C
24" B O X
1 N Y S - R E D
24" B O X
13 A G A - B L U
5 G A L
4 C U P - T I N
15 G A L
20 E R I - G R A
1 G A L
25 B O U - B L O
1 G A L
18 V E R - L I L
1 G A L
15 A R C - S U N
5 G A L
23 N A N - G U L
1 G A L
1 B U D - C R A
1 G A L
7 S A L - C L E
5 G A L
4 A R C - R E F
5 G A L
14 A R C - J O H
1 G A L
4 M A H - S O F
5 G A L
1 A C E - P A C
15 G A L
3 R H U - I N T
15 G A L
29 W E S - B O X
1 G A L
13 B U X - J A P
5 G A L
12 I L E - V O M
5 G A L7 A R C - P A C
5 G A L
1 A C E - A R M
24" B O X
14 C E A - Y A N
5 G A L
1 C H O - T E R
5 G A L
2 L Y O - F L O
36" B O X
20 H E B - L A K
5 G A L
23 S E S - C A M
1 G A L
1 H E T - A R B
15 G A L
1 C I T - T A N
15 G A L
1 C I T - M E Y
15 G A L
1 C I T - M E Y
15 G A L
1 C I T - M E Y
15 G A L
1 C I T - T A N
15 G A L
1 C I T - T A N
15 G A L
1 C I T - M E Y
15 G A L
1 C I T - T A N
15 G A L
16 A R C - C A R
1 G A L
5 S A L - C L E
5 G A L
12 E L Y - C 0 N
1 G A L
14 E L Y - C 0 N
1 G A L
9 A R C - J O H
1 G A L
4 B U X - J A P
5 G A L
8 A C H - P A P
1 G A L
5 C H R - T E C
5 G A L
8 W E S - B O X
1 G A L
8 W E S - B O X
1 G A L
3 C H R - T E C
5 G A L
8 C O N - M A U
1 G A L
1 C H I - T I M
15 G A L
5 N A N - G U L
1 G A L
8 C E A - Y A N
5 G A L
1 H E T - A R B
15 G A L
5 N A N - G U L
1 G A L
2 S A L - A P I
1 G A L

CLOUD (TYP) REPRESENTS

PLANTING PALETTE CHANGES

TO REFLECT NATIVE
POLLINIZERS 4/28/25
NN N N
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
N N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N = CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT VARIETY
NNN
N
ATTACHMENT 4
211

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)
PLANTING LEGEND:

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME WUCOLS QUANTITY SIZE CA. (water use rating) NATIVE
TREES:

ACE PAC Acer circinatum 'Pacific Fire' Vine Ma ple medium 1 15 GALLON YES ACE ARM Acer rubrum 'Armstron g Gold' Red Maple medium 3 24" BOX NO CER OCC Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud very low 2 24" BOX YES CHI RET Chionanthus retusa Chinese Fringe Tree medium 3 36" BOX NO CHI TIM Chilo psis linearis 'Timeless Beauty' Desert Willow low 1 15 GALLON YES COT ROY Cotinus co ggygria 'Royal Purple' Smoke Tree low 1 15 GALLON NO GIN GOL Gink go biloba 'Autumn Gold' Ginkgo Tree medium 4 24" BOX NO LYO FLO L yonothamnus floribundus Catalina Ironwood low 2 36" BOX YES NYS RED N yssa sylvatica 'Red Rage' Pepperidge medium 1 24" BOX NO EVERGREENS:

CUP TIN Cu
pressus sempervirens ‘Tiny Towers’ Dwarf Italian Cypress low 4 15 GALLON NO SUCCULENTS AND YUCCAS:

AGA BLU A
gave 'Blue Flame' Blue Glow Agave low 27 5 GALLON NO
PEN HET Penstemon hetero phyllus 'Blue Springs' Foothill Penstemon low 12 1 GALLON YES FRUIT TREES:

CIT TAN Citrus 'Tan
go' Tango Mandarin medium 4 15 GALLON NO
CIT MEY Citrus limon ‘Me yer’s Improved’ Lemon medium 4 15 GALLON NO SHRUBS:

ARC SUN Arctosta
phylos 'Sunset' Manzanita Variety low 15 5 GALLON YES
ARC SEN Arctosta phylos densiflora 'Sentinal' Manzanita Variety low 1 5 GALLON YES ARC PAC Arctosta phylos 'Pacific Mist' Manzanita Variety low 7 5 GALLON YES ARC REF Arctosta phylos refugioensis Refugio Manzanita medium 4 5 GALLON YES BUX JAP Buxus 'Green Velvet' Korean Boxwood medium 34 5 GALLON NO CHO TER Chois ya ternata Mexican Orange medium 1 5 GALLON NO CAR CAL Car penteria californica Bush Anenome low 7 5 GALLON YES CEA YAN Ceanothus griseus var. horizontalis 'Yankee Point' Yankee Point Ceanothus low 22 5 GALLON YES HEB LAK Hebe 'Lake' Hebe Variety medium 20 5 GALLON NO
ILE VOM Ilex vomitora 'Nana' Dwarf Yaupon Holly medium 12 5 GALLON NO MAH SOF Mahonia 'Soft Caress' Oregon Grape medium 4 5 GALLON YES HET ARB Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon low 2 15 GALLON YES RHU INT Rhus inte grifolia Lemonade Berry low 3 15 GALLON YES SAL CLE Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gilman' Sage Variety low 12 5 GALLON YES GRASSES AND GRASSLIKE:

BOU BLO Bouteloua
gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Gramma Grass medium 43 1 GALLON YES CHR TEC Chrondro petalum tectorum 'El Campo' Cape Reed low 8 5 GALLON NO ELY CON El ymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' Giant Wild Rye low 26 1 GALLON YES SES CAM Sesleria autumnalis 'Cam po Verde' Moor Grass Variety medium 67 1 GALLON NO PERENNIALS AND SUBSHRUBS:

ARC CAR Arctosta phylos edmundsii 'Carmel Sur' Manzanita Variety low 16 1 GALLON YES ARC-JOH Arctosta phylos 'John Dourley' Manzanita Variety low 24 1 GALLON YES ACH PAP Achillea millefolium ‘Pa prika’ Paprika Yarrow low 8 1 GALLON NO BUD CRA Buddleia davidii ‘CranRazz' Butterfly Bush low 1 1 GALLON NO EPI EVE E pilobium 'Everett's Choice' Everett's California Fuchsia low 5 1 GALLON YES CON MAU Convolvulus mauritanicus Ground Morning Glory low 8 1 GALLON NO CON XER Convovulvus cneorum 'Xera S phere' Silver Morning Glory low 12 1 GALLON NO ERI GRA Erio gonum grande ‘rubescens’ California Buckwheat low 20 1 GALLON YES NAN GUL Nandina domestica alba 'Lemon Lime' Lemon Lime Nandina low 33 1 GALLON NO VER LIL Verbena lilacina 'De La Mina' Cedros Island Verbena medium 18 1 GALLON YES SAL ARM Salvia 'Amistad' Friendship Sage medium 5 1 GALLON NO SAL BEE Salvia 'Bee's Bliss' Creeping Sage low 15 1 GALLON YES SAL API Salvia a piana White Salvia low 2 1 GALLON YES
WES BOX Westrin gia rosmariniformis ‘Grey Box’ Westringia Variety low 61 1 GALLON NO

PLANTING NOTES

AND LEGENDS
L-3
P L A N T I N G N O T E S:

GENERAL NOTATION:

THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE JOB. CONTRACTOR SHALL

NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS

THAT OBSTRUCTIONS, UTILITIES, LANDSCAPE GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR

LANDSCAPE AREA DISCREPENCIES OCCUR ON SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REPRESENTED ON THE DESIGN. SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER. THE CONTRACTOR

SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION. ALL LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES SHALL BE OBSERVED. PLANTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH

ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES BY EXPERIENCED WORKMEN

AND A LICENSED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WHO SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND PAY ALL REQUIRED FEES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE

FOR COORDINATION BETWEEN TRADES AND SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE

FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES CAUSED BY OR DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS/ HER WORK. ALL REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.

SOIL TEST:

THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN A SOILS ANALYSIS

FROM AN APPROVED LAB TO INDICATE WHAT AMENDMENTS WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO ADD TO THE SOIL PREPERATION REGIME. TESTS SHOULD

ANALYZE SOIL FERTILITY, HORTICULTURAL SUITABILITY, AND PHYSICAL

CHARACTERISTICS AND SHOULD RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE MEASURES. SOIL TEST SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING.

SOIL PREPARATION:

THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISH GRADING AND ALL PLANTING AREA DRAINAGE. POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM HOUSE (2 % MIN.) SHALL BE MAINTAINED. NO LOW SPOTS WHICH HOLD STANDING WATER WILL BE ACCEPTED. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCORPORATE BACKFILL SOIL MIXES IN PLANTING AREAS AS NOTED BELOW. WHERE ROTOTILLING IS NOT POSSIBLE, WORK IN AMENDMENT WITH HAND TOOLS. AFTER

INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ALL PLANTING AREAS ARE TO BE FINE GRADED TO WITHIN 2 INCHES AND SLIGHTLY MOUNDED AWAY FROM EDGES OF TOP OF HEADER, CURB, WALK, PLANTER, ETC... AND RAKED SMOOTH WITH ALL ROCK AND DEBRIS OVER 1 INCH IN DIAMETER REMOVED.SOIL AMENDMENTS:

THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCORPORATE, BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLING, 6 CUBIC YARDS OF 'NITROFIED' SOIL CONDITIONER (WITH A PH OF 6.5 TO 7.5) AND 15 LBS. OF GRANULAR FERTILIZER (12-12-12) PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF PLANTING AREA INTO THE TOP 6" OF SOIL FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS. IN AREAS WITH A SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER OR WHERE PLANT MATERIAL IS SPACED 60" ON

CENTER OR GREATER THE RECOMMENDED HORTICULTURAL BACKFILL MIX SHALL BE PER PLANT PIT ONLY-SEE PLANTING DETAILS. DO NOT AMEND SOIL WITHIN BIORETENTION AREAS. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR SOIL PREPARATION IN THESE AREAS. SOIL SHALL NOT BE WORKED WHEN WET.

BEDDING AREAS:

PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND 6" (OR DEPTH NOTED) OF PURE PLANTING MIX (SUCH AS DIABLO SOIL'S 'DIABLO MIX') SHALL BE USED. NO TOP DRESSING SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CULTIVATED BEDS.BACKFILL SOIL MIXES:

PLANTING PIT MIX FOR TREES AND SHRUBS TO CONSIST OF 1/3 ORGANIC AMENDMENT AND 2/3 AMENDED TOPSOIL AS NOTED ABOVE.

ACID BACKFILL MIX:

BACK FILL FOR ACID LOVING PLANTS (FOR ALL CITRUS OTHERS ) SHALL BE 30 % AMENDED SOIL, 20 % SAND, AND 50 % PRE-MOISTENED PEAT WITH '49'ER BRAND ACID FOOD' AT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED APPLICATION RATE. PLANTING PITS TO BE MINIMUM 2 TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL AND 2 TIMES DEPTH OF ROOTBALL.

AGAVE, CACTUS AND SUCCULENT BACKFILL MIX:

BACK FILL FOR SPECIALTY PLANTING (FOR ALL CACTUS, SUCCULENTS, AGAVE AND OTHERS ) SHALL BE 30 % PALM AND CACTUS PLANTING MIX, 30 % SAND, AND 40 % PUMICE (AVAILABLE AT SLOAT GARDEN SUPPLY) PLANTING PITS TO BE MINIMUM 2 TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL AND 2 TIMES DEPTH OF ROOTBALL.

SHRUB PLANTING:

THE SHRUBS SHALL BE SPOTTED AS PER PLAN. NO SUBSTITUTIONS UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER OR OWNER. ALL SHRUBS SHALL RECIEVE TURFGRO 20-10-5 PACKETS AT THE FOLLOWING RATIOS:
(1) TABLET PER 1 GALLON, (2) TABLETS FOR 5 GALLON, AND (4) TABLETS FOR 15 GALLON.TREE PLANTING:

THE TREES SHALL BE SPOTTED AS PER PLAN. TREES SHALL TYPICALLY BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4') FEET FROM ALL CURBS, WALKS, HEADERS, BUILDINGS, OR OVERHANGS, AND OTHER TREES WITHIN THE PROJECT. TREE BACKFILL SHALL BE THE ‘PIT PLANTING MIX’ AS NOTED ABOVE. STD. TRUNK INDICATES A SINGLE TRUNK, AND A MULTI TRUNK INDICATES (3) TRUNKS FROM THE BASE OF TREE. DOUBLE STAKE ALL STANDARD TRUNK TREES. ALL TREES SHALL RECIEVE TURFGRO 20-10-5 PACKETS AT THE FOLLOWING RATIOS: (4) TABLET PER 15 GALLON, (5) TABLETS FOR 24" BOX, AND (6) TABLETS FOR 36" BOX AND LARGER.

THOROUGHLY WATER ALL TREES IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING PLANTING.

GROUND COVER:

PLANT AT THE SPACINGS NOTED ON THE LEGEND. GROUND COVER SHALL

EXTEND UNDER ALL SHRUB AREAS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE COMPLETE GROUND COVER COVERAGE.

TOP DRESSING:

TOP DRESSING TO CONSIST OF 3" LAYER NATURAL BROWN SHREDDED

REDWOOD BARK MULCH' FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS EXCEPT LAWN AND MEADOW GRASS. NO MULCH SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN A 3" CLEAR BAND AROUND TRUNK OF TREES. MULCHES AVAILABLE AT SLOAT GARDEN CENTER 925 743 0288 OR APPROVED EQUAL. MAINTANENCE:

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE PROJECT FOR 90 DAYS ( OR AS APPROVED BY OWNER ) UPON COMPLETION AND APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT.

DURING THE ENTIRE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, WATERING, CULTIVATING, WEEDING,

REPAIR OF STAKES AND TIES, AND SPRAYING FOR INSECTS AND DISEASES SHALL BE PERFORMED. AT THE END OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD, ALL AREAS SHALL BE

FREE OF WEEDS AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IN A HEALTHY, THRIVING CONDITION. SUBSTITUTIONS:

REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL TO BE MADE (5) DAYS PRIOR TO PLANTING.

GUARANTEE:

ALL CONSTRUCTION, TREES, SHRUBS, AND IRRIGATION BY LANDSCAPE

CONTRACTOR AND/OR HIS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE (1) FULL YEAR AFTER THE BEGINNING OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY AND ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS THAT ARE IN

AN UNACCEPTABLE CONDITION FOR THE TIME OF USE, AND ANY PLANT MATERIAL THAT ARE NOT IN A VIGOROUS STATE OF GROWTH. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT

BE HELD LIABLE FOR LOSS OF PLANT MATERIAL DUE TO VANDALISM, ACCIDENTAL

CAUSES, OR ACTS OF NEGLECT BY OTHERS THAN THE CONTRACTOR, HIS AGENTS, OR EMPLOYEES.

PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE:

A GRANULAR PRE-EMERGENT (SUCH AS RON-STAR) SHALL BE APPLIED

TO ALL PLANTING AREAS AS PER MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE USE OF CHMICAL PRODUCTS AND IS TO

SUPPLY THE OWNER WITH A WRITTEN RECORD OF THE TYPE OF
CHEMICAL USED, DATE APPLIED AND THE RATE OF APPLICATION.

UTILITIES:

CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TREE PLANTING WITH DRAINLINES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO AVOID CONFLICT. LOCATE TREES A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.ADDITIONAL PLANT CONTINGENCY:

CONTRACTOR SHALL INCORPORATE INTO THE BID AN ADDITIONAL 5 %OF TOTAL PLANT QUANTITIES FOR EACH CONTAINER SIZE FOR ALL NON-TREE PLANT MATERIAL. QUANTITY AND PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL

PLANTS TO BE DETERMINED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING PLANT PLACEMENT. PLANT PLACEMENT SITE OBSERVATION:

CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A MINIMUM OF 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANT SPOTTING. THERE SHALL BE A SITE
OBSERVATION OF PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALL

PLANTINGS SHALL BE LOCATED PER PLAN IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO OBSERVATION. COORDINATION AND SITE VERIFICATION:

CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTPECT THE SITE AND BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. THE LANDSCAPE

CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL RELATED DRAWINGS AND SHALL

ENSURE COORDINATION WITH ALL OTHER TRADES DURING
CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID.

PLANT QUANTITIES:

CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANT QUANTITIES ARE LISTED FOR THE
CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ACTUAL NUMBER OF SYMBOLS

SHALL HAVE THE PRIORITY IN LIEU OF QUANTITIES DESIGNATED IN CALLOUTS.

NOTE: ALL SHRUBS HAVE A MINIMUM 5-GALLON POT SIZE
GROUND COVERS:

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/SIZE/SPACING WUCOLS COMMON NAME
Arctostaphylos uva ursi 'Green Su preme' from 1 gallon low Bearberry @ 42" o.c. Triangular Spacing. Manzanita

GROUND COVER SPACING

NO SCALE
EQ.

EQ.

EQ.
12" DEEPER THAN
CONTAINER MIN.
2 X DIAMETER

OF ROOTBALL

CINCH TIE OR

APPROVED EQUAL
10' LODGE POLE STAKES PLACED ON

WINDWARD SIDE OF TREE

ROOT BALL
A SHALLOW BASIN 2" DEEP SHALL BE

FORMED AROUND ROOTBALL BELOW FINISH
GRADE. TREES PLANTED IN LAWN SHALL NOT

HAVE BASIN

APPROVED BACKFILL

THROUGHLY MIXED PRIOR

TO INSTALLATION

NATIVE GRADE OR CERTIFIED
COMPACTED BACKFILL.

STANDARD TRUNK TREE PLANTING
TURFGRO 20-10-5 PACKETS

PER SPECIFICATIONS
WIND

DIRECTION

PREVAILING
3'' DIAMETER LODGPOLE PINE TREE
STAKES (2) - LOCATE OUTSIDE OF

ROOTBALL AND PERPENDICULAR TO

PREVAILING WIND (SEE PLAN VIEW)

ROOTBALL
TRUNK
TIES
PIT
NOTES:

1. APPROVED TREE TIES TO RUBBER STRAPS
NAILED TO STAKES. NO WIRE CONNECTIONS
ALLOWED.

2. REMOVE ALL NURSERY STAKES FROM
ROOTBALL. SIDES OF PLANT PIT TO BE
VERTICAL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM.

3. DO NOT PLANT TREES WITHIN 10' OF
SEWER OR DOMESTIC WATER LINES.
3"
CLR.

DEPTH OF

CONTAINER
2 X D I A M E T E R

O F R O O T B A L L

A SHALLOW BASIN
2" DEEP SHALL BE

FORMED AROUND

ROOT BALL BELOW
FINISH GRADE.

ROOT BALL
FINISH GRADE.

APPROVED BACKFILL

THROUGHLY MIXED

PRIOR TO INSTALLATION

NATIVE GRADE OR

CERTIFIED

COMPACTED

BACKFILL

SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
TURFGRO 20-10-5 PACKETS

PER SPECIFICATIONS

PROPOSED

NATURAL FORM

MULTI TRUNK TREE
(NO STAKING)FINISH
GRADE

LATERAL LINEPLANTING PIT
IS 3 TIMES

DIAMETER OF

ROOTBALL
2" WATERING
BASIN

RAINBIRD RWS-BGG

ROOT WATERING
SYSTEM

BACKFILL

MULTI TRUNK TREE

N O S C A L E
ATTACHMENT 4
212

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
0 4' 8' 16' 24'

GENERAL NOTES

CONTRACTORS MUST BE PROPERLY AND

CURRENTLY LICENSED BY THE CALIFORNIA

CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSED BOARD PRIOR

TO ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO

PERFORM WORK AND MAY PERFORM ONLY

SUCH WORK AS IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SAID
LICENSED SPECIALTY.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

BEING FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES.

CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE

RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST INCURRED DUE TO

DAMAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES

PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
USA UNDERGROUND ALERT @ (800) 277-2600.

NORTH

BUS STOP TRASH
SIGN

EXISTING WIRE
FENCE
GATE
FIRE

WOOD FENCE
NO

PARKING

VAN ACCESSIBLE
9'-0" X 19'-0"
WM

IRRIGATION PLAN
L-4
IRRIGATION INSTALLATION NOTES:

1. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WATER PRESSURE
PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.

2. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL SPRAY

HEADS TO AVOID OVERSPRAY

3. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER TO BE PROGRAMMED TO OPERATE
BETWEEN 8 P.M. AND 8 A.M.

4. THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SCHEDULE SHALL BE CHANGED

FOR EACH SEASON

5. THE RAINBIRD AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF DEVICE SHALL BE

LOCATED ON TOP OF THE ROOF DIRECTLY ABOVE THE
CONTROLLER. THE DEVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED AWAY FROM
ANY OVERHANGS OR TREES.

6. AUTOMATIC INLINE VALVES TO BE SET IN VALVE BOXES.

LOCATE VALVE BOXES IN GROUND COVER AREAS

7. LOCATE A CHECK VALVE ABOVE LOWEST HEAD IN EACH
SPRAY LINE.

RAINBIRD XFCV NOTES:

1. INSTALL A RAINBIRD DRIP OPERATION INDICATOR

ON EACH DRIP ZONE FOR INSTANT VISUAL PROOF THAT LINE IS OPERATING.

2. RAINBIRD XFCV TUBING TO BE STAKED AT 3' ON CENTER.

3. RAINBIRD XFCV TUBING TO BE SPACED AT 18" ON CENTER,
KEEP TUBES MINIMUM 4" FROM EDGE OF PLANTING AREA.

4. RAINBIRD XFCV TUBING TO BE BURIED MINIMUM 4", MAXIMUM 6" DEEP.

5. INSTALL A MANUAL FLUSHING VALVE AT THE LOW POINT OF
EACH EXHAUST HEADER.

POINT OF CONNECTION TO WATER
SUPPLY:

INSTALL COMPRESSION TEE ON

DOMESTIC WATER LINE AND
CONNECT TO NEW 1 1/4" PVC
MAINLINE. VERIFY A MINIMUM
STATIC WATER PRESSURE OF 55
PSI. IF EXCEEDS 95 PSI, INSTALL

PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE
(SEE LEGEND) VERIFY A MINIMUM
AVAILABLE FLOW OF 22 GPM.

WALL MOUNT EXTERIOR
CONTROLLER LOCATION:

PROVIDE CONNECTION
TO 120 VOLT POWER

WITHIN RIGID STEEL

CONDUIT FROM SOURCE
TO BE DETERMINED.

ALL ABOVE GRADE

CONTROL WIRES SHALL

BE CONTAINED WITHIN

PVC ELECTRICAL

CONDUIT SECURELY
FASTENED TO WALL.

FINAL CONTROLLER

LOCATION TO BE

COORDINATED WITH
OWNER.

CO
4 1" 7.0 3 1" 4.0 2 1" 4.0
1 1" 4.0
5 1" 5.0
6 1" 4.0
7 1" 4.0
8 1" 5.0
ATTACHMENT 4
213

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)
3541

EASTT AVENUE

LIVERMORE,, CA

47.2 0.55
Hydrozone # / Planting
Descriptiona
Plant Factor
(PF)
Irrigation
Methodb
Irrigation
Efficiency (IE)
c
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape Area
(Sq. Ft.)
ETAF x
Area
Estimated Total Water
Use (ETWU)
d
MEDIUM WATER USE 0.4 0.75 0.53 4750 2533 74135

0.75 0.00 0 0
a

0.75 0.00 0 0

0.75 0.00 0 0
b

0.75 0.00 0 0

0.75 0.00 0 0
c

0.75 0.00 0 0

0.75 0.00 0 0
d

0.75 0.00 0 0

0.75 0.00 0 0
e

0.75 0.00 0 0

0.75 0.00 0 0
Totals 4750 2533 74135
VEG. GARDEN 1 0 0
10 0
10 0
10 0
Totals 0 0 0
74135
76452 0.45
ETAF Calculations

0.55 Regular Landscape Areas 0.81
Total ETAF x Area 2533 0.75
Total Area 4750
Average ETAF 0.53
Total ETAF x Area 2533
Total Area 4750
Average ETAF 0.53
Residential
California Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Project Type
Regular Landscape Areas
Residential
All Landscape Areas
Special Landscape Areas
ETWU Total
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)e
Drip
Overhead
MAWA (Annual Gallons Allowed) =
(Eto) (0.62) [ (ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)]
Where 0.62 is a conversion factor to change acre-inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per year, LA is the total regular landscape area in square feet, SLA is the total special landscape area in square feet, and ETAF is 0.55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-residential areas Average ETAF for Regular Landscape
Areas must be 0.55 or below for residential
areas, and 0.45 or below for non-residential
areas.

Hydrozone # / Planting Description e.g.

1.) Front lawn

2.) Low water use planting

3.) Medium water use planting
Irrigation Method

1.) Overhead Spray

2.) Drip
Irrigation Efficiency

1.) 0.75 for Overhead Spray

2.) 0.81 for Drip
ETWU (Annual Gallons Required) =
Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
Where 0.62 is a conversion factor to change acre-inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per year
Non-Residential
NOTES:

1. SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM OF
18 GPM @ 55 PSI STATIC PRESSURE. IRRIGATION

CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY A MINIMUM PRESSURE OF
55 PSI PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

2. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE

APPROXIMATELY WHERE INDICATED AND ACCORDING
TO LOCAL CODES (IF APPLICABLE). INSTALL USING

BRASS OR COPPER (TYPE K ) NIPPLES, FITTINGS AND
UNION. WRAP ALL BRASS OR COPPER NIPPLES
AND FITTINGS BELOW FINISH GRADE WITH 10 MIL
CORROSION PROTECTION TAPE.

3. ALL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED, BUT NOT SPECIFIED

ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE

IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO INSURE A COMPLETE
AND FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S
INSTRUCTIONS AND AS INDICATED IN THE PLAN.

4. CONTROLLER LOCATION APPROXIMATE. EXACT

LOCATION OF WALL MOUNT OR PEDESTAL MOUNT
CONTROLLER TO BE DETERMINED AT JOBSITE. 110

VOLT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY IS PROVIDED FOR IN

IMMEDIATE VICINITY ON ANOTHER SECTION OF
CONTRACT.IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO MAKE FINAL
110 VOLT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION. USE WATER
PROOF CONNECTION FOR OUTDOOR INSTALLATION.

5. THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND ALL MAINLINES

AND VALVES SHOWN IN HARD SURFACE AREAS

ARE FOR LIABILITY PURPOSE ONLY AND SHALL BE
LOCATED IN PLANTED AREAS AS POSSIBLE.

6. USE PRIMER DURING IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINE
INSTALLATION. PRESSURE TEST SUPPLY LINES AS
NECESSARY PRIOR TO BACKFILL.

7. HOUSE REMOTE CONTROL VALVES IN PLASTIC
BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. PLACE VALVES 12"
FROM ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, BUILDINGS, ETC., AT
FINISH GRADE. PLACE DRAIN ROCK UNDER VALVES
TO A 6" DEPTH WITH A 3" CLEARANCE UNDER
VALVE. STENCIL VALVE BOX NUMBER ON LID. COIL
3 FEET OF EXCESS WIRE IN VALVE BOX.

8. INSTALL 4" AND 6 " POP UPS USING TRIPLE

SWING RISER ASSEMBLIES CONSISTING OF
SCHEDULE 80 NIPPLES AND SCHEDULE 40 FITTINGS.

PLACE HEADS 6 INCHES FROM ADJACENT CURBS,
SIDEWALKS, ETC., AND SET 1/2 INCH ABOVE FINISH
GRADE. SET FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN LAWN
AREAS.

9. ALL PIPE UNDER A.C. PAVEMENT SHALL BE 1120/
SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE, 24 INCH COVER, WITH

SAND BLANKET AROUND PIPE AND A MINIMUM OF
6" SAND COVER ON TOP SIDE OF PIPE.

10. ALL VALVE CONTROL WIRE SHALL BE AWG 14
TYPE UF, 600 VOLT TEST DIRECT BURIAL. CONNECT

WIRE USING PEN-TITE CONNECTORS WITH EPOXY
RESIN.

11. ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER HEADS FOR COMPLETE

COVERAGE WITH MINIMUM SPRAY ON SIDEWALKS,
ETC. AND THROTTLE FLOW CONTROL AT VALVE
FOR OPTIMUM OPERATION.

12. 1 1/4 INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC PRESSURE MAIN LINE
TO POINT OF CONTROL.

13. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE

THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AGAINST DEFECTIVE

MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE
(1) YEAR FROM THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE

14. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY

AUTOMATIC, FULLY OPERATIONAL, AND DEMONSTRATE

FULL AND UNIFORM COVERAGE, AND BE LEFT READY
FOR OPERATION PRIOR TO JOB COMPLETION.

IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES :

GENERAL NOTES:

DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT

IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR DIFFERENCES IN

AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OR DIFFERENCES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE IRRIGATION DESIGNER IMMEDIATELY. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER OF ANY

ASPECTS OF LAYOUT WHICH WILL PROVIDE INCOMPLETE COVERAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL, AND DO NOT PROCEED WITH WORK UNTIL DESIGNER IS NOTIFIED. IN THE EVENT THAT

NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

IT SHALL BE THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS. CITYSTANDARD DRAWINGS,

SPECIFICATION, DETAIL DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS WELL AS THE SOILS REPORT, SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL DRAWINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. THE

IRRIGATION DESIGNER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY BEYOND THE ADEQUACY OF THE DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN.

DRAWINGS:

DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS, FITTINGS, SLEEVES, ETC. , WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE JOB. THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE, AND MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION. THE

IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY INSPECT THE STRUCTURAL AND FINISHED

CONDITION OF THE FIELD CONDITIONS THAT MAY AFFECT HIS WORK, PLAN ACCORDINGLY, AND PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS REQUIRED TO MEET SUCH FIELD CONDITIONS. THE IRRIGATION

SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT AVOIDS CONFLICTS BETWEEN PLANTING, LIGHTING, AND OTHER LANDSCAPE OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. ALL PIPING, VALVES, ETC.

SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS ARE FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.

IRRIGATION
NOTES
L-5

WATER CALCULATIONS MODEL EFFICIENT WATER USE ORDINANCE IRRIGATION LEGEND IRRIGATION NOTES

HYDROZONE MAP

BUS STOP TRASH
SIGN

EXISTING WIRE
FENCE
UNIT 1 UNIT 2
UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 UNIT 12 UNIT 13
UNIT 3 UNIT 5UNIT 4 UNIT 8UNIT 6 UNIT 7
ADU
GATE
FIRE

WOOD FENCE WOOD FENCE

DOLORES STREET

EAST AVEUNE
NO

PARKING

VAN ACCESSIBLE
9'-0" X 19'-0"
WM

HYDROZONE MAP

NOT TO SCALE

HYDROZONE LEGEND

MEDIUM WATER USE,
DRIP
4750 SQUARE FT.

PIPING LEGEND:

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
1 1/4" MAINLINE SCH. 40 PVC
PLASTIC PIPE WITH SCH. 40
P.V.C. SOLVENT FITTINGS. 18" COVER
1" LATERAL LINE
3/4" LATERAL LINE
1/2" LATERAL LINE
POINT SOURCE DRIP IRRIGATION ZONE.

RAINBIRD XF DRIPLINE TUBING OR EQUAL

USE DRIP LINE OPERATION INDICATOR AND FLUSH
(USE 1/4" XQ DRIPLINE TO BARB EMITTERS AND STAKES )
RAINBIRD XFCV .6 gph / 18" spacing DRIPLINE
4" P.V.C. SLEEVE

IRRIGATION LEGEND

SYMBOL NUMBER DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD ESP CONTROLLER TM2-12 12 STATION CONTROLLER LNK 2 WIFI RAIN BIRD LINK WIFI MODULE

RAIN SENSOR RAIN BIRD RAIN SENSOR
FEBCO 825 Y 1" BACKFLOW

PREVENTION DEVICE
600LX WILKINS PRESSURE
REDUCING VALVE (line size)
B110 STOCKHOLM GATE
VALVE (line size)
XCZ-100-PRF RAINBIRD LOW FLOW PRESSURE REGULATING
WITH 200 MESH FILTER IN-LINE REMOTE CONTROL ZONE KIT
WITH 200 MESH FILTER AND BALL VALVE
PC-05 BARB PER SCHEDULE RAIN BIRD PRESSURE-COMPENSATING MODULES BLANK TUBING BARB WITH 1/4 TUBING, STAKES, AND BUG CAP
RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C-PCT-10 RAIN BIRD TREE BUBBLER SYSTEM

SEE TREE BUBBLER SYSTEM DETAIL
PVC TO 3/4" DRIP HEADER /FLUSH

POINT SOURCE IRRIGATION
RAINBIRD PC-5 BARB DRIP EMITTER
SCHEDULE:
1 GALLON - (1) RAIN BIRD PC-5
5 GALLON - (2) RAIN BIRD PC-5
15 GALLON - (3) RAIN BIRD PC-5
24" BOX TREES- (4) RAIN BIRD PC-5
ZONE
CO
ATTACHMENT 4
214

TTOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT
35411 EASTT AVE
LIVERMORE, CA.

REV.. NO. REVISION
JOBB NO: DATE:: 11/18/20
DRAWN: SCALE:: 1/8"" == 1'-0"MFH
NOTE:

THIS PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. IT IS

MEANT AS A GENERAL GUIDE TO CONSTRUCTION
ONLY. IT IS NOT FULLY DETAILED NOR
EXHAUSTIVELY SPECIFIED.

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR

TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
PROMPTLY WITH ANY FIELD DISCREPANCIES. IT IS

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND/

OR OWNER TO VERIFY, SELECT, AND RESOLVE

ALL STRUCTURES, WATER FEATURES, AND
PLANTING MATERIALS.

THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER ARE SOLEY

RESPONSIBLE FOR QUALITY CONTROL,

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND FOR

MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
ANDCOUNTY CODES ON THIS PROJECT.

M a r t i n H o f f m a n n

LLANDSCAPEE ARCHITECT
4713 FIRST STREET
SUITE 205

PLEASANTON, CA
925 462 2190
[email protected]
2/25/21 10/4/22
8/6/24 2/10/25
4/28/255 (NATIVEE PALETTE)

IRRIGATION

DETAILS
L-6

TREE DRIP SYSTEM

NO SCALE

PROPOSED TREE
FINISH
GRADE

LATERAL LINEROOTBALL
2" WATERING BASIN

BACKFILL
NOTE:

REFER TO EMITTER

SCHEDULE

POLY DRIPLINE RING WITH

BARB DRIP EMITTERS

PLAN VIEW

DRIPLINE RING WITH

BARB DRIP EMITTERS

SEE SCHEDULE FOR

BARB EMITTERS

LATERAL
LINE

PVC TO POLY PIPE

CONNECTION

BARB POLY LINE

FITTINGS

TREE ROOTBALL

BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE

NO SCALE
DRIP CONNECTION :

PVC TO POLYTUBE ON GRADE
CXCXFPT SCH. 40

PVC FITTING

CONNECTION
3/4" MALE

ADAPTER
P.V.C. TEE P.V.C. PIPING
(LATERAL LINE)

USE FIR BARK MULCH

COVER- SEE PLANTING

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

TYPE AND DEPTH
12" MIN.

DRIP TUBING
BURIED 2"-3" MIN.
3" THICK TOP

DRESSING

FILTER/ PRESSURE REGULATOR

NO SCALE

PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE
(PRE SET TO 40 PSI)

TO VALVE

USE A STANDARD BRICK OR

FLAT STONE UNDER EACH

CORNER OF VALVE BOX TO
LEVEL

FILTER WITH SCREEN
(ROTATE FILTER TO BELOW

HORIZONTAL POSITION)
FINISH
GRADE
SCH. 40 PVC

MAIN LINE
CARSON 1419 PLASTIC

VALVE BOX OR EQUAL
APPLY 3" GRAVEL PEA GRAVEL

AT BASE OF BOX TO PREVENT

SILTATION

SLEEVING INSTALLATION

NO SCALE
24"
MIN.36" MIN.

PAVING SAND BACKFILL COMPACTED TO

THE DENSITY OF EXISTING SOIL
CONTROL WIRES IN SCH. 40 SLEEVE

UNDISTURBED
SOIL

PRESSURIZED

MAINLINE
IN SCH. 40
SLEEVE

LATERAL
LINES
IN SCH.40

SLEEVES

PVC SLEEVES

TO BE TWICE

THE DIAMETER

OF THE PIPE

OR WIRE
BUNDLE

CARRIED

PIPE TRENCHING

NO SCALE
12" MIN.
18" MIN.

FINISH GRADE

CLEAN COMPACTED

BACKFILL

CONTROL WIRES

UNDISTURBED SOIL

PRESSURIZED MAINLINE

SEE SPECIFICATIONS

LATERAL LINES
SEE

SPECIFICATIONS LOW-VOLUME CONTROL SYSTEM

NO SCALE
FLOW
3/4" PRV45 PSI LF

REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE
PVC MAINLINE 2" MINIMUM

CLEARANCE

PVC OR POLY

LATERAL LINE

VALVE BOX
12" X 18"
1 CU. FT. PEA

GRAVEL SUMP

BRICK SUPPORT
(1- EA. CORNER)
200 MESS FILTER
3/4" SCH 40. RED BUSHING THDxTHD
NOTES:

1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL ROWS AND EMITTER SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, PLANT MATERIALS AND CHANGES IN ELEVATION. SEE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS ON RAIN BIRD WEB SITE (WWW.RAINBIRD.COM) FOR SUGGESTED SPACING.

2. LENGTH OF LONGEST DRIPLINE LATERAL SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SPACING SHOWN IN THE ACCOMPANYING TABLE.

3. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY THREE FEET IN SAND, F0UR FEET IN LOAM, AND FIVE FEET IN CLAY.

4. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE-DOWN STAKES ON EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION.

XFCV SUB-SURFACE DRIPLINE / POINT SOURCE EMITTERS

CURVED EDGE LAYOUT QF HEADER
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18

PVC SUPPLY PIPE FROM RAIN BIRD CONTROL

ZONE KIT (SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW

DEMAND) PERIMETER OF AREA

PERIMETER DRIPLINE PIPE TO BE INSTALLED
2"-4" FROM PERIMETER OF AREA

QF-SUPPLY HEADER

RAIN BIRD XFS SERIES DRIPLINE (TYPICAL)
BARB X BARB INSERT TEE:

RAIN BIRD XFF-TEE (TYPICAL)

TOTAL LENGTH OF SELECTED DRIPLINE

SHOULD NOT EXCEED LENGTH SHOWN IN
TABLE

FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP OR OPTIONAL

PVC BALL VALVE

QF-FLUSH HEADER
PVC SCH 40 ELL (TYPICAL)

PVC RISER PIPE

STAINLESS STEEL, OETIKER OR MURRAY
CLAMP
PVC SCH 40 CAP

OPERATION INDICATOR
RAIN BIRD MODEL: OPERIND
XF SERIES TIE-DOWN STAKES (TDS-050)
PVC SCH 40 BALL VALVE

REFERR TOO RAINN BIRDD DRIPLINEE DESIGNN GUIDEE FORR PROPERR SPACING

PERIMETER OF AREA

PRE-INSTALLED BARB FITTING

NO SCALE
OP
1 INSET A
45 6
2 3
9 10
8 7

INSET A
10 1 54
12 11
1 13
2"-4"
14 13
13 16 14
17 INSET B

INSET C

INSET B

INSET C
15 9
6 9
6 14
18 4-6"

DRIP MANIFOLD
\PBURIAL DEPTH
XF SERIES INSERT FITTING XFF-MA- 050/075
(TYPICAL)
ATTACHMENT 4
215
ATTACHMENT 4
216
55REE'LHVWOHU
ATTACHMENT 4
217
55RE'LHVWOHU
ATTACHMENT 4
218
55RE'LHVWOHU
ATTACHMENT 4
219
55RE'LHVWOHU
ATTACHMENT 4
220
55RE'LHVWOHU
ATTACHMENT 4
221
ATTACHMENT 5
222
Technical Memorandum
Date:

To:

From:

June
, 2025
Frank Abboud and Terry J. Townsend
N17
Praveena Samaleti
TJKM
Jorge A. Muradas, EIT
TJKM
Jurisdiction: City of Livermore
Subject: 3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of the updated transportation assessment evaluating the proposed development at 3541 East Avenue, consisting of a parcel of land located at the southeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and Dolores Street, in Livermore, California.

This memorandum is meant to update and s upersede a previous Technical Memorandum prepared for the same site titled “East and Dolores Traffic Study” dated November 9 th, 2020. The
Year 2020 transportation assessment consisted of the evaluation of the development of the project site to consist of 9 mult i-family residential units. The updated transportation assessment evaluates the development with an increase in the number of multi-family residential units from 9 units to 13 units.

The Year 2020 memorandum documenting the assessment of the project site with 9 multi-family residential units is included in Attachment 1.

This updated transportation assessment includes a trip generation, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, an onsite circulation evaluation, and ac cess analysis. These evaluations are aimed to address the following:

ATTACHMENT 6
223
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
2 1. Identify whether the project would result in any significant VMT impact based on OPR’s screening methods.

Per the Technical Advisory published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), a quantitative VMT assessment forms the basis of the CEQA analysis for a proposed project. Effective as of July 1, 2020, inters ection LOS can no longer be used to determine significant impacts for CEQA purposes.

The OPR guidelines include the fo llowing screening criteria for identifying projects that can be presumed to have a less-than-significant impact:
x Within a Transit Priority Area, depending on applicability; x Within a designated low VMT area; or,
x Local Serving Projects.

Local serving projects include K-1 public schools, local parks, daycare centers, retail facilities of less than 50,000 SF, non-destination hotels, student housing, assembly uses, community institutions, locall y serving community colleges, affordable or supportive housing, assisted living facilities, senior housing, or projects generally generating less than 110 average daily trips (ADT).

To estimate trips generated by the proposed development for the weekday morning (AM) and weekday afternoon (PM) peak periods as well as for weekday daily trips, TJKM utilized the published trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, and consistent with the methodology published in ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition.

TJKM used published trip rates for the ITE Land Use Code 220 (Multifamily Housing – Low- Rise) to establish the proposed land uses.

The trip generation is shown in Table 1, the Project is calculated to generate approximately 88 ADT during a typical weekday, including 6 AM peak hour trips (1 In / 5 Out) and 7 PM peak hour trips (4 In / 3 Out).

Therefore, since the project trip generation re sults in 88 ADT (lower than the OPR’s VMT screening threshold of 110 ADT), the Project is screened out from a VMT analysis.

ATTACHMENT 6
224
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
3 Total Rate Total In % Out % In Out Rate Total In % Out % In Out Multifamily Low-Rise Units 220 13 DU 6.74 DU 88 0.47 6 24% 76% 1 5 0.57 7 62% 38% 4 3 88 6 1 5 7 4 3
AM Peak Hour
Source - Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition (09/2021).

Total Proposed Units 13 Units
3541 East Avenue - Trip Generation
Land Use ITE
Code
Land Use
Intensity
Rate
Daily
------ Weekday ------
PM Peak Hour
Table 1: Project Trip Generation

2. Provide on-site circulation analysis.

As shown in the project site plan included in Attachment 2, the Project provides one two- car garage for each of the thirteen (13) pr oposed units. In addition, there are three (3) guest parking spaces planned to be located adjacent to the project site entrance and one (1) van-accessible parking space on the northern side of the planned development.

On-site circulation is planned to consist of an internal street that will connect with the project driveway forming an L-shaped pathwa y for users. The internal street will run parallel to the housing units and will have a dead-end on the northern side of the project site. This internal street wi ll be used only by residents and potential guests/visitors who may need to venture into the dead-end area.

Therefore, on-site circulation is anticipated to be adequate for the planned uses.

3. Provide queueing analysis at any project driveway on Dolores Avenue if left-turn-in movement is allowed.

For the evaluation of queueing at the pr oject access driveway, TJKM has referenced a previous Technical Memorandum prepared to evaluate the traffic growth along East Avenue titled “Traffic Growth Percentage Along East Avenue” dated May 26th, 2020.

In the referenced memorandum, an evaluation of various methodologies to establish traffic growth around East Avenue was conducted.

ATTACHMENT 6
225
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June 9, 2025 4 One of the methodologies consisted of comparing Year 2016 and Year 2018 AM and PM peak hour counts for the intersection of East Avenue at Dolores Street. The comparison yielded a growth rate of -9.4% for AM peak hour traffic and 0.2% for PM peak hour traffic.

A separate methodology consisted of comparing the Alameda County Transportation Commission Year 2010 and Year 2040 travel demand models for the segment along East Avenue adjacent to Livermore High School. This comparison yielded an annual growth rate of 1.34%.

TJKM proceeded to reference the Year 2018 peak hour traffic data for the intersection of East Avenue at Dolores Street and the application of a 1.34% annual growth rate over the span of 7 years to calculate baseline Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection.

Figure 1 shows the AM and PM peak hour volumes of the intersection of East Avenue at Dolores Street for Year 2018 conditions and the calculated baseline volumes for Year 2025.

Figure 1: East Avenue at Dolores Street Year 2018 and Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Volumes ATTACHMENT 6
226
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
5 Using the calculated Year 2025 peak hour volumes, TJKM proceeded to reference these volumes to estimate the volumes along Dolores Street at the Project driveway location.

The volumes at the Project driveway location were estimated as follows:
¾ For NB traffic along Dolores Street: the sum of the NB-L, NB-T, and NB-R volumes at the intersection of East Avenue at Dolores Street.
¾ For SB traffic along Dolores Street: the su m of the WB-L, EB-R, and SB-T volumes at the intersection of East Avenue at Dolores Street.

Following the methodology outlined above, TJKM estimated the NB-T and SB-T volumes along Dolores Street at the Project driveway location.

A 95 th percentile queueing analysis was condu cted to analyze queueing at the Project driveway location considering a Project driv eway with a general-purpose configuration allowing right-in/right-out movements as well as left-in/left-out movements.

Following the latest HCM methodology and utilizing the Synchro 12.0 software package, TJKM conducted an AM and PM peak hour que ueing evaluation at the Project driveway location.

With the addition of Project traffic (referenced from the calculated Project trip generation as shown in Table 1), and assuming a trip distribution of traffic where 80% of Project traffic travels to and from the north of the Project driveway and 20% of Project traffic travels to and from the south of the Project driveway, queueing at the Project driveway location was conducted and analysis result worksheets are included in Attachment 3. The queueing analysis at the Project driveway location is observed to result in the following:

AM Peak Hour:
¾ NB Approach (Dolores St.): queue length = 0 vehicles
¾ SB Approach (Dolores St.): queue length = 0 vehicles
¾ WB Approach (driveway): queue length = 0 vehicles
PM Peak Hour:
¾ NB Approach (Dolores St.): queue length = 0 vehicles
¾ SB Approach (Dolores St.): queue length = 0 vehicles
¾ WB Approach (driveway): queue length = 0 vehicles
ATTACHMENT 6
227
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
6 Therefore, as shown in the AM and PM peak hour assessment of the intersection of Dolores Street at the Project driveway, 95th percentile queues during an average peak hour are anticipated to be on average minimal, if any.

ATTACHMENT 6
228
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
7 Attachment 1
Technical Memorandum “East and Dolores Traffic Study” dated November 9th, 2020 The page has been left blank intentionally. The attachment is provided on the following page.

ATTACHMENT 6
229

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: November 9, 2020
To: Joanna Liu
From:

Chris D. Kinzel, P.E.

Vice President
Subject: East and Dolores Traffic Study
The proposed nine unit development is located in the southeast quadrant of East Avenue and Dolores Street. These are responses to your questions:
x Identify whether the project would result in any significant VMT impact based on OPR's screening thresholds
The nine unit project would generate fewer than 90 trips per day. OPR suggests projects generating fewer than 110 daily trips may be screened out from VMT analysis. Therefore, no further analysis is needed.
x Provide on-site circulation analysis
The project provides one two-car garage for each of the nine units. In addition, there are three guest stalls near the entrance. On-site circulation is dead-end but only the residents will need to venture into the dead-end area. Guests will either park near the entrance on-site or on-street. Many on-street parking stalls are available. The circulation is adequate.
x Provide queuing analysis at any project driveway on Dolores Avenue if left-turn-in movement is allowed.

The project driveway is located about 175 feet south of the East Avenue intersection stop bar. The project generates two southbound inbound trips in the a.m. peak hour and seven southbound inbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. In the morning Dolores has 114 northbound trips and 93 southbound trips. Two entering vehicles against 114 approaching vehicles should produce practically no queuing.

ATTACHMENT 6
230
VISIONTHATMOVESYOURCOMMUNITY
In the afternoon peak the seven inbound trips (one every 8+ minutes on average) encounter 147 northbound vehicles plus there are 118 southbound vehicles. The estimated ADT is 2,400 vpd on Dolores. With these volumes little, if any, queuing issues can be expected on Dolores near the entrance to the project.

Please contact me if there are questions about these matters.

ATTACHMENT 6
231
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
8 Attachment 2
Project Site Plan
The page has been left blank intentionally. The attachment is provided on the following page.

ATTACHMENT 6
232
ATTACHMENT 6
233
3541 East Avenue – Transportation Assessment (Update) June , 2025
9 Attachment 3
AM and PM 95th Percentile Queueing Synchro Worksheets for Dolores Street at Project Driveway Location
The page has been left blank intentionally. The attachment is provided on the following page.

ATTACHMENT 6
234
HCM 7th TWSC AM Peak Hour
1: Project Dwy. & Dolores St. 06/04/2025
Scenario 1 2:12 pm 06/04/2025 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Livermore City CouncilOctober 27, 2025

Livermore City Council
October 27, 2025