Livermore City Council
July 27, 2026

EXHIBIT A
626

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B811509200 6466 ROSEMARY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509300 6458 MAGNOLIA CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509400 6430 MAGNOLIA CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509500 6457 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509600 6464 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509700 6362 BLUEBONNET CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509800 6351 BLUEBONNET CMN SFR $935.88
099B811509900 6373 BLUEBONNET CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510000 6395 BLUEBONNET CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510100 1986 CORNFLOWER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510200 1970 CORNFLOWER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510300 1957 CORNFLOWER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510400 1979 CORNFLOWER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510500 6361 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510600 1988 CORIANDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510700 1972 CORIANDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510800 1959 CORIANDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811510900 1981 CORIANDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511000 1993 CORIANDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511100 6413 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511200 6425 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511300 6439 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511400 2016 DAHLIA CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511500 2042 DAHLIA CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511600 2050 DAHLIA CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511700 2025 DAHLIA CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511800 6366 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811511900 6418 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811512000 6436 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811512100 6440 TIFFANY CMN SFR $935.88
099B811512200 1910 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512300 1922 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512400 1934 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512500 1956 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512600 1978 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512700 2002 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512800 2018 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811512900 2036 HAWK ST SFR $935.88
099B811600100 1169 CENTRAL AVE SFR $935.88
099B811600200 1161 CENTRAL AVE SFR $935.88
099B811600300 5724 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811600400 5756 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811600500 5778 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811600601 5810 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811600702 5832 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811600800 5864 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811600900 5886 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811601000 1165 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811601100 1151 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811601200 1147 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811601300 1133 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B811601400 5877 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811601500 5853 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811601600 5821 LOBELIA WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602100 5704 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602200 5726 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602300 5758 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602400 5770 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602500 5812 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602600 5834 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602700 5866 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602800 5888 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811602900 1181 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811603000 1177 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811603100 1173 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811603200 5873 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603300 5851 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603400 5829 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603500 5797 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603600 5765 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603700 5743 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603800 5721 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811603900 5709 EDELWEISS WAY SFR $935.88
099B811604500 1291 CENTRAL AVE SFR $935.88
099B811604600 1283 CENTRAL AVE SFR $935.88
099B811604700 1265 CENTRAL AVE SFR $935.88
099B811604800 1247 CENTRAL AVE SFR $935.88
099B811604900 5718 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811605000 5740 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811605100 5762 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811605200 1256 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605300 1268 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605400 1284 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605500 1296 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605600 1293 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605700 1281 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605800 1279 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811605900 1245 HYACINTH CT SFR $935.88
099B811606000 5814 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811606100 5856 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811606200 5878 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811606300 5890 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811606400 1254 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811606500 1266 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811606600 1280 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811606700 1292 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811606800 1277 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811606900 1243 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811607000 1205 ORCHID CT SFR $935.88
099B811607100 1197 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811607200 1193 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88
099B811607300 1185 ORCHID ST SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
627

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B811607400 5893 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811607500 5889 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811607600 5867 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811607700 5845 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811607800 5823 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811607900 5791 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811608000 5779 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811608100 5757 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811608200 5735 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811608300 5713 WOODROSE WAY SFR $935.88
099B811700100 1802 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700200 1814 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700300 1826 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700400 1848 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700500 1860 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700600 1872 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700700 1886 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700800 1904 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811700900 1918 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701000 1920 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701100 1932 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701200 1944 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701300 1950 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701400 1925 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701500 1891 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701600 1879 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701700 1867 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701800 1855 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811701900 1833 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811702000 1821 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811702100 1809 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B811800100 2640 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800200 2654 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800300 2668 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800400 2676 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800500 2680 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800600 2694 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800700 2702 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800800 2716 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811800900 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801000 2744 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801100 2816 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801200 2838 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801300 2864 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801400 2870 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801500 2884 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801600 2902 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801700 2924 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801800 2946 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811801900 2968 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811802000 2980 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B811802100 3008 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802200 3022 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802300 3064 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802400 3076 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802500 3088 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802600 3102 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802700 3124 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802800 3136 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811802900 3158 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803000 3170 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803100 3196 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803200 3189 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803300 3181 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803400 3165 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803500 3147 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803600 3113 BRIDLE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803700 5406 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803800 5442 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811803900 5468 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811804000 5482 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811804100 5493 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811804200 5475 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811804300 5459 MARTINGALE CT SFR $935.88
099B811804400 2991 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811804500 2977 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811804600 2953 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811804700 2915 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811804800 2859 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811804900 2827 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805000 2805 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805100 2799 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805200 2773 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805300 2767 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805400 2755 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805500 2741 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805600 2723 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811805700 2604 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811805800 2626 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811805900 2658 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811806000 2670 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811806100 2682 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811900100 2552 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811900200 2574 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811900300 2616 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811900400 2628 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811900500 2632 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B811900600 2679 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811900700 2667 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811900800 2645 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811900900 2613 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88
099B811901000 2601 HORSESHOE CT SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
628

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B811901100 2602 LARIAT CT SFR $935.88
099B811901200 2634 LARIAT CT SFR $935.88
099B811901300 2676 LARIAT CT SFR $935.88
099B811901400 2688 LARIAT CT SFR $935.88
099B811901500 2653 LARIAT CT SFR $935.88
099B811901600 2621 LARIAT CT SFR $935.88
099B811901700 2531 GELDING LN SFR $935.88
099B812000100 2106 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812000200 2114 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812000300 2118 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812000400 1991 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B812000500 1979 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B812000600 1984 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B812000700 1988 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B812000800 1996 MEADOW GLEN DR SFR $935.88
099B812000900 6881 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001000 6867 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001100 6845 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001200 6803 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001300 6810 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001400 6852 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001500 6878 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001600 6894 BROOKVIEW CT SFR $935.88
099B812001700 6824 LAKE CT SFR $935.88
099B812001800 6856 LAKE CT SFR $935.88
099B812001900 6880 LAKE CT SFR $935.88
099B812002000 2218 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002100 2234 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002200 2256 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002300 2275 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002400 2263 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002500 2247 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002600 2229 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002700 2211 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002800 2205 BLUFFS CT SFR $935.88
099B812002900 2218 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812003000 2226 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812003100 6985 HILLSTONE CT SFR $935.88
099B812003200 6941 HILLSTONE CT 1SFR/1MFR $1,692.48
099B812003300 6910 HILLSTONE CT SFR $935.88
099B812003400 6938 HILLSTONE CT SFR $935.88
099B812003500 6976 HILLSTONE CT SFR $935.88
099B812003600 2325 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812003700 2293 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812003800 2259 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812003900 2237 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812004000 2203 HILLSTONE DR SFR $935.88
099B812004100 2177 DRY CREEK CT SFR $935.88
099B812004200 2155 DRY CREEK CT SFR $935.88
099B812004300 2133 DRY CREEK CT SFR $935.88
099B812004400 2111 DRY CREEK CT SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B812004500 6941 LAKE DR SFR $935.88
099B812004600 2179 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812004700 2165 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812004800 2151 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812004900 2133 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812005000 2129 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812005100 2121 BLUFFS DR SFR $935.88
099B812201700 6075 AUTUMN LEAF CMN SFR $935.88
099B812201800 6053 AUTUMN LEAF CMN SFR $935.88
099B812201900 6011 AUTUMN LEAF CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202000 6002 AUTUMN LEAF CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202100 6044 AUTUMN LEAF CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202200 6060 AUTUMN LEAF CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202300 1402 ROSE GATE CM SFR $935.88
099B812202400 6155 SWEET BRIAR CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202500 6178 SWEET BRIAR CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202600 6126 SWEET BRIAR CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202700 6115 WINTERBERRY CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202800 6137 WINTERBERRY CMN SFR $935.88
099B812202900 6171 WINTERBERRY CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203000 6186 WINTERBERRY CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203100 6150 WINTERBERRY CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203200 6122 WINTERBERRY CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203300 6125 SPRINGTIME CM SFR $935.88
099B812203400 6157 SPRINGTIME CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203500 6189 SPRINGTIME CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203600 6196 SPRINGTIME CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203700 6168 SPRINGTIME CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203800 6130 SPRINGTIME CMN SFR $935.88
099B812203900 6114 SPRINGTIME CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204000 1628 SUMMERHOUSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204100 1660 SUMMERHOUSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204200 1615 SUMMERHOUSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204300 1653 SUMMERHOUSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204400 1687 SUMMERHOUSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204500 1721 ROSE GATE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204600 1753 ROSE GATE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204700 1775 ROSE GATE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812204800 1797 ROSE GATE CM SFR $935.88
099B812204900 6056 CLIMBING ROSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812205000 6014 CLIMBING ROSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812205100 6023 CLIMBING ROSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812205200 6075 CLIMBING ROSE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812205300 1696 ROSE GATE CMN SFR $935.88
099B812300500 6522 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812300600 6518 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812300700 6514 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812300800 6510 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812300900 6506 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812301000 6502 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812301200 6496 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
629

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B812301300 6492 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812301400 6488 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812301500 6484 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812301600 6480 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812301700 6476 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302000 6472 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302100 6468 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302200 6464 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302300 6460 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302400 6456 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302500 6452 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302700 6448 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302800 6444 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812302900 6440 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303000 6436 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303100 6432 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303200 6428 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303500 6653 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303600 6657 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303700 6671 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303800 6675 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812303900 6679 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304000 6685 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304200 6424 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304300 6420 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304400 6416 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304500 6412 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304600 6408 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304700 6404 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812304900 6382 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305000 6360 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305100 6348 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305200 6336 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305300 6314 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305400 6302 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305600 6288 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305700 6280 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305800 6274 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812305900 6262 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306000 6258 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306100 6250 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306300 6244 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306400 6238 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306500 6230 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306600 6226 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306700 6218 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306800 6210 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812306900 6202 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307100 6221 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307200 6235 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307300 6241 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B812307400 6247 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307500 6249 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307600 6255 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307800 6269 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812307900 6277 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308000 6283 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308100 6285 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308200 6291 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308300 6295 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308400 6299 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308700 6196 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308800 6188 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812308900 6182 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309000 6174 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309100 6170 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309200 6162 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309300 6156 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309500 6148 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309600 6144 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309700 6136 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309800 6130 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812309900 6122 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310000 6116 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310100 6104 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310300 6101 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310400 6109 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310500 6113 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310600 6119 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310700 6125 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310800 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812310900 6141 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311100 6153 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311200 6159 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311300 6167 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311500 6634 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311600 6630 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311700 6622 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311800 6616 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812311900 6608 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312000 6604 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312200 6526 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312300 6530 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312400 6534 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312500 6538 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312600 6542 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312700 6546 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812312900 6621 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313000 6617 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313100 6613 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313200 6609 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313300 6605 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
630

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B812313400 6601 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313600 6645 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313700 6641 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313800 6637 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812313900 6633 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812314000 6629 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812314100 6625 FORGET ME NOT CMN CON $756.60
099B812700400 1130 ORCHID PL SFR $935.88
099B812700500 1118 ORCHID PL 1SFR/1MFR $1,692.48
099B812700600 1105 ORCHID PL SFR $935.88
099B812700700 1121 ORCHID PL SFR $935.88
099B812700800 1125 ORCHID PL SFR $935.88
099B812800700 5802 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812800800 5806 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812800900 5810 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801000 5812 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801100 5818 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801200 5822 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801300 5830 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801400 5838 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801500 5842 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801600 5852 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801700 5856 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801800 5860 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812801900 5866 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802000 5872 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802100 5847 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802200 5846 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802300 5855 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802400 5852 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802500 5868 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802600 5863 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802700 5871 TORTUGA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802800 5876 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812802900 5878 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803000 5896 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803100 5882 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803200 5890 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803300 5889 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803400 5893 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803500 5885 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803600 5881 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803700 5873 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803800 5877 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812803900 5869 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804000 5865 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804100 5857 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804200 5861 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804300 5853 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804400 5849 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804500 5841 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B812804600 5845 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804700 5837 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804800 5833 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812804900 5825 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805000 5829 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805100 5821 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805200 5817 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805300 5809 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805400 5813 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805500 5805 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B812805600 5801 FLORA CMN SFR $935.88
099B813001900 302 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002000 304 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002100 306 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002200 308 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002300 310 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002400 312 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002500 316 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002600 318 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002700 320 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002800 322 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813002900 324 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003000 326 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003100 328 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003200 330 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003300 332 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003400 334 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003500 336 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003600 338 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003700 342 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003800 344 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813003900 346 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004000 348 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004100 350 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004200 352 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004300 354 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004400 356 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004500 358 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004600 360 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004700 362 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004800 364 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813004900 193 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005000 189 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005100 185 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005200 181 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005300 177 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005400 173 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005500 169 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005600 165 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005700 161 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813005800 157 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
631

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B813005900 153 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006000 149 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006100 145 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006200 141 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006300 137 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006400 133 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006500 129 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006600 125 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006700 121 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006800 117 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813006900 113 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813007000 109 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813007100 105 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813007200 101 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813007300 242 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813007400 234 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813007500 226 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813007600 218 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813007700 210 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813007800 202 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813007900 205 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008000 213 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008100 221 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008200 229 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008300 237 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008400 245 STRATUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008500 292 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008600 280 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008700 272 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008800 264 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813008900 252 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009000 248 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009100 251 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009200 259 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009300 271 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009400 279 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009500 287 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813009600 295 NIMBUS CMN SFR $935.88
099B813101700 368 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813101800 370 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813101900 372 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102000 374 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102100 376 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102200 378 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102300 380 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102400 382 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102500 384 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102600 386 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102700 388 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102800 390 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813102900 502 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B813103000 504 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103100 506 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103200 508 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103300 510 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103400 512 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103500 514 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103600 516 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103700 518 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103800 520 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813103900 522 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104000 524 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104100 548 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813104200 550 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813104300 529 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104400 523 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104500 517 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104600 511 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104700 503 MISTY LN SFR $935.88
099B813104800 532 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813104900 534 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105000 538 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105100 540 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105200 542 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105300 539 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105400 535 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105500 533 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105600 531 THUNDER CMN SFR $935.88
099B813105700 553 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813105800 559 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813105900 565 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813106000 569 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813106100 573 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813106200 577 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813106300 581 MISTY WAY SFR $935.88
099B813106400 773 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813106500 767 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813106600 763 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813106700 759 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813106800 755 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813106900 751 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107000 747 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107100 743 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107200 739 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107300 735 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107400 731 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107500 727 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107600 723 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107700 717 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107800 713 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813107900 709 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813108000 705 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
632

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B813108100 701 MISTY CIR SFR $935.88
099B813108200 880 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108300 868 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108400 850 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108500 832 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108600 818 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108700 802 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108800 805 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813108900 821 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813109000 837 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813109100 853 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813109200 871 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813109300 885 CLOUD CMN SFR $935.88
099B813202600 900 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813202700 906 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813202800 910 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813202900 914 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203000 918 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203100 922 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203200 926 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203300 930 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203400 934 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203500 938 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203600 942 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203700 946 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203800 950 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813203900 954 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204000 958 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204100 962 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204200 968 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204300 972 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204400 976 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204500 980 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204600 984 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204700 988 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204800 992 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813204900 996 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205000 1002 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205100 1006 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205200 1012 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205300 1018 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205400 1022 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205500 1026 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205600 1032 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205700 1038 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205800 1044 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813205900 1048 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206000 1054 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206100 1060 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206200 1068 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206300 1072 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B813206400 1080 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206500 1088 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206600 1094 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813206700 1301 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813206800 1305 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813206900 1309 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207000 1329 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207100 1321 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207200 1317 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207300 1335 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207400 1341 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207500 1347 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207600 1367 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207700 1359 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207800 1353 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813207900 1371 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813208000 1379 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813208100 1385 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813208200 1399 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813208300 1395 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813208400 1391 WINDSWEPT CMN SFR $935.88
099B813209200 1238 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209300 1224 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209400 1212 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209500 1200 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209600 1206 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209700 1218 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209800 1230 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813209900 1240 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813210000 1298 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813210100 1294 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813210200 1288 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813210300 1282 GUSTY LOOP SFR $935.88
099B813210400 1140 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813210500 1130 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813210600 1120 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813210700 1110 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813210800 1100 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813210900 1102 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211000 1114 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211100 1126 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211200 1138 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211300 1142 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211400 1190 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211500 1180 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211600 1170 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211700 1160 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211800 1150 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813211900 1152 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813212000 1164 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813212100 1176 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
633

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B813212200 1188 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813212300 1192 FLURRY DR SFR $935.88
099B813212400 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #1 CON $756.60
099B813212500 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #2 CON $756.60
099B813212600 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #3 CON $756.60
099B813212700 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #4 CON $756.60
099B813212800 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #5 CON $756.60
099B813212900 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #6 CON $756.60
099B813213000 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #7 CON $756.60
099B813213100 1300 WINDSWEPT CMN #8 CON $756.60
099B813213300 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #1 CON $756.60
099B813213400 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #2 CON $756.60
099B813213500 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #3 CON $756.60
099B813213600 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #4 CON $756.60
099B813213700 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #5 CON $756.60
099B813213800 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #6 CON $756.60
099B813213900 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #7 CON $756.60
099B813214000 1320 WINDSWEPT CMN #8 CON $756.60
099B813214200 1310 WINDSWEPT CMN #1 CON $756.60
099B813214300 1310 WINDSWEPT CMN #2 CON $756.60
099B813214400 1310 WINDSWEPT CMN #3 CON $756.60
099B813214500 1310 WINDSWEPT CMN #4 CON $756.60
099B813214600 1310 WINDSWEPT CMN #5 CON $756.60
099B813214800 1270 GUSTY LOOP #1 CON $756.60
099B813214900 1270 GUSTY LOOP #2 CON $756.60
099B813215000 1270 GUSTY LOOP #3 CON $756.60
099B813215100 1270 GUSTY LOOP #4 CON $756.60
099B813215200 1270 GUSTY LOOP #5 CON $756.60
099B813215300 1270 GUSTY LOOP #6 CON $756.60
099B813215400 1270 GUSTY LOOP #7 CON $756.60
099B813215600 1280 GUSTY LOOP #1 CON $756.60
099B813215700 1280 GUSTY LOOP #2 CON $756.60
099B813215800 1280 GUSTY LOOP #3 CON $756.60
099B813215900 1280 GUSTY LOOP #4 CON $756.60
099B813216000 1280 GUSTY LOOP #5 CON $756.60
099B813216100 1280 GUSTY LOOP #6 CON $756.60
099B813216200 1280 GUSTY LOOP #7 CON $756.60
099B813216300 1280 GUSTY LOOP #8 CON $756.60
099B813216500 1260 GUSTY LOOP #1 CON $756.60
099B813216600 1260 GUSTY LOOP #2 CON $756.60
099B813216700 1260 GUSTY LOOP #3 CON $756.60
099B813216800 1260 GUSTY LOOP #4 CON $756.60
099B813216900 1260 GUSTY LOOP #5 CON $756.60
099B813217100 1250 GUSTY LOOP #1 CON $756.60
099B813217200 1250 GUSTY LOOP #2 CON $756.60
099B813217300 1250 GUSTY LOOP #3 CON $756.60
099B813217400 1250 GUSTY LOOP #4 CON $756.60
099B813217500 1250 GUSTY LOOP #5 CON $756.60
099B813217600 1250 GUSTY LOOP #6 CON $756.60
099B813217700 1250 GUSTY LOOP #7 CON $756.60
099B813301500 803 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
099B813301600 805 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813301700 809 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813301800 811 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813301900 815 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302000 817 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302100 821 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302200 823 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302300 827 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302400 829 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302500 835 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302600 837 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302700 841 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302800 843 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813302900 847 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303000 849 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303100 855 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303200 857 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303300 861 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303400 865 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303500 867 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303600 875 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303700 877 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303800 883 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813303900 885 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304000 889 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304100 891 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304200 895 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304300 898 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304400 894 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304500 890 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304600 882 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304700 878 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304800 874 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813304900 870 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305000 864 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305100 860 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305200 856 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305300 850 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305400 844 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305500 840 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305600 834 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305700 830 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305800 824 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813305900 818 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813306000 814 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813306100 810 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813306200 806 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
099B813306300 802 BARNEY CMN SFR $935.88
902 001200800 623 LAURELWOOD CT SFR $935.88
902 001200900 635 LAURELWOOD CT SFR $935.88
902 001201000 647 LAURELWOOD CT SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
634

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
902 001201100 659 LAURELWOOD CT SFR $935.88
902 001201200 661 LAURELWOOD CT SFR $935.88
902 001201400 710 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001201500 602 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001201600 634 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001201700 656 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001201800 698 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001203100 773 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203200 761 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203300 757 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203400 755 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203500 749 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203600 741 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203700 735 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203800 727 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001203900 723 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204000 719 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204100 705 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204200 683 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204300 661 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204400 708 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204500 724 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204600 730 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204700 736 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204800 754 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001204900 760 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001205000 768 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001205101 776 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001205202 782 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001205301 855 HIGHLAND ST SFR $935.88
902 001205401 821 HIGHLAND ST SFR $935.88
902 001205501 3726 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001205600 3748 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001205701 3760 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001205802 3798 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001205900 3812 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001206000 3918 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001206100 3954 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001206200 673 LAURELWOOD DR SFR $935.88
902 001206300 788 AUSTEN CT SFR $935.88
902 001206400 764 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001206500 732 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001206600 716 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001300100 4001 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300200 4005 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300300 4017 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300400 4023 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300500 4029 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300600 4047 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300700 4075 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001300800 4093 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
902 001300900 4107 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001301000 4135 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001301100 4169 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001301200 4181 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001301300 4197 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001301400 609 ELIOT DR SFR $935.88
902 001301500 611 ELIOT DR SFR $935.88
902 001301600 623 ELIOT DR SFR $935.88
902 001301700 635 ELIOT DR SFR $935.88
902 001301800 647 ELIOT DR SFR $935.88
902 001302000 705 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302100 4172 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302200 4164 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302300 4150 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302400 4138 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302500 4126 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302600 4114 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302700 4101 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302800 4107 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001302900 4123 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001303000 4135 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001303100 4149 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001303200 4157 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001303300 4169 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001303400 4173 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001303500 780 TENNYSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001303600 724 TENNYSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001303700 702 TENNYSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001303800 688 DICKERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001303900 672 DICKERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304000 656 DICKERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304100 4174 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304200 4158 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304300 4126 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304400 4110 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304500 4102 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304600 4088 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304700 4064 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304800 4052 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001304900 4040 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001305000 4026 EMERSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001305700 4214 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001305800 4180 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001305900 4168 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306000 4146 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306100 4122 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306200 4106 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306300 713 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001306400 725 AUSTEN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001306500 4137 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306600 4153 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
635

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
902 001306700 4175 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306800 4199 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001306900 4201 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001400300 713 TENNYSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001400400 745 TENNYSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001400500 767 TENNYSON DR SFR $935.88
902 001400600 4271 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001400700 4289 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001400800 807 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001400900 829 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001401000 841 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001401100 873 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001401200 4294 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001401300 4282 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001401400 4278 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001401500 4266 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001402000 4186 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001403300 4244 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001403400 4232 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001403500 4220 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001403600 4208 MILTON WAY SFR $935.88
902 001404300 921 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001404400 953 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001404500 985 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001404600 997 CHAUCER WAY SFR $935.88
902 001404700 4390 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001404800 4388 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001404900 4372 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405000 4350 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405100 4336 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405200 4322 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405300 4304 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405400 4301 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405500 4313 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405600 4345 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405700 4367 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405800 4379 CHAUCER CT SFR $935.88
902 001405900 4344 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406000 4338 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406100 4326 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406200 4302 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406300 4284 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406400 4278 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406500 4266 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406600 4262 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001406700 937 DICKENS CT SFR $935.88
902 001406800 975 DICKENS CT SFR $935.88
902 001406900 980 DICKENS CT SFR $935.88
902 001407000 962 DICKENS CT SFR $935.88
902 001407100 946 DICKENS CT SFR $935.88
902 001407200 928 DICKENS CT SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
902 001407300 4228 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001407400 4217 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001407500 4233 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001407600 4255 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001407700 4259 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001407800 4277 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001407900 4281 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001408000 4293 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001408100 4315 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001408200 4327 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001408300 4349 BELLMAWR DR SFR $935.88
902 001500200 3687 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500300 3673 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500400 3669 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500500 3657 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500600 3641 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500700 3633 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500800 3627 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001500900 3619 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001501000 3605 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001501100 752 TROUN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001501200 764 TROUN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001501300 776 TROUN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001501400 780 TROUN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001501500 796 TROUN WAY SFR $935.88
902 001501600 3604 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001501700 3620 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001501800 3628 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001501900 3634 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001502000 822 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502100 846 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502200 884 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502300 891 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502400 879 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502500 857 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502600 835 WHITHORN CT SFR $935.88
902 001502700 828 HIGHLAND ST SFR $935.88
902 001502800 842 HIGHLAND ST SFR $935.88
902 001502900 866 HIGHLAND ST SFR $935.88
902 001503000 880 HIGHLAND ST SFR $935.88
902 001503100 795 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001503200 779 NEWBURY ST SFR $935.88
902 001503300 3685 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001503400 3671 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001503500 3667 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001503600 3655 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001503700 3639 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001503800 3631 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001503900 3625 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001504000 3617 THORNHILL DR SFR $935.88
902 001504100 3612 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
636

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
902 001504200 3630 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001504300 3636 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001504400 3648 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001504500 3664 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001504600 3670 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001504700 3682 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
902 001504800 3698 MONTROSE PL SFR $935.88
903 001104000 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104100 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104200 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104300 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104400 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104500 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104600 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104700 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104800 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001104900 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105000 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105100 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105200 2833 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105400 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105500 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105600 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001105700 2866 ALNWICK AVE #4 CON $756.60
903 001105800 2866 ALNWICK AVE #5 CON $756.60
903 001105900 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001106000 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001106100 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001106200 2866 ALNWICK AVE CON $756.60
903 001106400 188 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001106500 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001106600 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001106700 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001106800 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001106900 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107000 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107100 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107200 188 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107400 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107500 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107600 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107700 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107800 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001107900 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108000 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108100 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108200 196 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108400 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108500 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108600 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108700 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001108800 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001108900 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109000 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109100 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109200 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109300 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109400 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109500 185 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109700 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109800 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001109900 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110000 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110100 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110200 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110300 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110400 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110500 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110600 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110700 173 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001110900 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111000 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111100 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111200 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111300 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111400 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111500 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111600 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111700 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111800 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001111900 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112000 207 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112200 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112300 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112400 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112500 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112600 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112700 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112800 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001112900 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001113000 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001113100 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001113200 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001113300 71 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001113500 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001113600 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001113700 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001113800 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001113900 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114000 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114100 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114200 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
637

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001114300 187 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114500 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114600 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114700 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114800 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001114900 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115000 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115100 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115200 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115300 175 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115500 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115600 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115700 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115800 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001115900 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116000 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116100 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116200 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116300 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116400 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116500 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116600 194 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116800 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001116900 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117000 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117100 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117200 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117300 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117400 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117500 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117600 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117700 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117800 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001117900 166 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118100 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118200 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118300 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118400 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118500 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118600 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118700 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118800 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001118900 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119000 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119100 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119200 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119300 140 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119500 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119600 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119700 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001119800 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001119900 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120000 132 SELBY LN #6 CON $756.60
903 001120100 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120200 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120300 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120400 132 SELBY LN #10 CON $756.60
903 001120500 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120600 132 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120800 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001120900 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121000 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121100 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121200 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121300 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121400 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121500 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121600 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121700 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121800 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001121900 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001122000 118 SELBY LN CON $756.60
903 001122200 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122300 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122400 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122500 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122600 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122700 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122800 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001122900 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123000 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123100 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123200 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123300 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123400 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123500 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123600 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123700 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001123800 164 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001124000 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124100 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124200 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124300 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124400 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124500 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124600 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124700 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124800 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001124900 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001125000 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001125100 2848 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001125300 2890 KEW AVE #1 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
638

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001125400 2890 KEW AVE #2 CON $756.60
903 001125500 2890 KEW AVE #3 CON $756.60
903 001125600 2890 KEW AVE #4 CON $756.60
903 001125700 2890 KEW AVE CON $756.60
903 001125800 2890 KEW AVE #6 CON $756.60
903 001125900 2890 KEW AVE #7 CON $756.60
903 001126000 2890 KEW AVE #8 CON $756.60
903 001126100 2890 KEW AVE #9 CON $756.60
903 001126200 2890 KEW AVE #10 CON $756.60
903 001126300 2890 KEW AVE #11 CON $756.60
903 001126400 2890 KEW AVE #12 CON $756.60
903 001126500 2890 KEW AVE #13 CON $756.60
903 001126600 2890 KEW AVE #14 CON $756.60
903 001126700 2890 KEW AVE #15 CON $756.60
903 001126900 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127000 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127100 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127200 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127300 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127400 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127500 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127600 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127700 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127800 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001127900 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128000 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128100 110 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128300 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128400 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128500 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128600 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128700 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128800 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001128900 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129000 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129100 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129200 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129300 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129400 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129500 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129600 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129700 152 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001129900 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130000 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130100 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130200 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130300 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130400 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130500 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130600 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
903 001130700 25 HELIGAN LN CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001201800 478 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001201900 482 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001202000 484 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001202100 486 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001202200 2991 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202300 2973 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202400 2957 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202500 2935 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202600 2911 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202700 2903 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202800 2865 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001202900 2843 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203000 2821 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203100 2807 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203200 487 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203300 475 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203400 463 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203500 451 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203600 449 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203700 437 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203800 425 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001203900 413 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204000 401 SUMAL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204100 2810 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204200 2828 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204300 2852 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204400 2874 LEMON CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204500 2906 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204600 2924 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204700 2948 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204800 2970 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001204900 2982 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001205000 2998 SAGE CMN SFR $935.88
903 001205100 462 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205200 468 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205300 470 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205400 474 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205500 446 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205600 448 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205700 452 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205800 454 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001205900 2995 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206000 2979 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206100 2963 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206200 2947 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206300 2925 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206400 2909 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206500 2857 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206600 2835 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206700 2811 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001206800 2803 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
639

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001206900 2806 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207000 2820 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207100 2844 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207200 2866 SALVIA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207300 2912 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207400 2930 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207500 2954 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207600 2976 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207700 2982 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207800 2996 BASIL CMN SFR $935.88
903 001207900 430 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208000 436 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208100 438 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208200 442 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208300 330 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208400 336 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208500 342 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208600 348 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001208700 2997 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001208800 2981 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001208900 2969 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209000 2955 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209100 2923 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209200 2905 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209300 2887 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209400 2875 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209500 2863 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209600 2841 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209700 2819 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209800 2805 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001209900 2808 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210000 2826 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210100 2850 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210200 2872 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210300 2894 HOYA CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210400 2918 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210500 2920 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210600 2944 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210700 2966 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210800 2978 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001210900 2994 KIWI CMN SFR $935.88
903 001211000 302 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211100 316 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211200 324 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211300 328 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211400 232 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211500 238 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211600 244 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211700 250 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001211800 2999 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001211900 2987 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001212000 2965 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212100 2943 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212200 2931 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212300 2907 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212400 2871 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212500 2859 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212600 2837 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212700 2815 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212800 2801 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001212900 2804 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213000 2822 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213100 2846 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213200 2868 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213300 2890 MINT CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213400 2900 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213500 2928 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213600 2952 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213700 2974 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213800 2980 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001213900 2992 CALICO CMN SFR $935.88
903 001214000 210 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001214100 218 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001214200 226 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001214300 230 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001307900 626 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308000 624 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308100 622 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308200 620 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308300 596 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308400 594 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308500 592 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308600 590 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308700 588 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308800 586 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001308900 584 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309000 582 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309100 574 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309200 572 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309300 570 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309400 568 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309500 566 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309600 564 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309700 562 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309800 560 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001309900 556 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310000 554 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310100 552 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310200 550 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310300 548 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310400 546 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310500 544 SELBY LN SFR $935.88

EXHIBIT A
640

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001310600 542 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310700 538 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310800 534 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001310900 530 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001311000 526 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001311100 522 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001311200 518 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001311300 506 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001311400 500 SELBY LN SFR $935.88
903 001311500 588 DOVECOTE LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001311600 588 DOVECOTE LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001311700 588 DOVECOTE LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001311800 588 DOVECOTE LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001312000 574 DOVECOTE LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001312100 574 DOVECOTE LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001312200 574 DOVECOTE LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001312300 574 DOVECOTE LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001312500 573 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001312600 573 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001312700 573 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001312800 573 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001313000 577 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001313100 577 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001313200 577 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001313300 577 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001313500 560 DOVECOTE LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001313600 560 DOVECOTE LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001313700 560 DOVECOTE LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001313800 560 DOVECOTE LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001314000 554 DOVECOTE LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001314100 554 DOVECOTE LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001314200 554 DOVECOTE LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001314300 554 DOVECOTE LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001314500 553 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001314600 553 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001314700 553 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001314800 553 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001315000 559 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001315100 559 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001315200 559 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001315300 559 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001315500 546 DOVECOTE LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001315600 546 DOVECOTE LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001315700 546 DOVECOTE LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001315800 546 DOVECOTE LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001316000 524 DOVECOTE LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001316100 524 DOVECOTE LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001316200 524 DOVECOTE LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001316300 524 DOVECOTE LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001316500 523 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001316600 523 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001316700 523 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001316800 523 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001317000 545 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001317100 545 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001317200 545 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001317300 545 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001317500 680 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001317600 680 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001317700 680 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001317800 680 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001318000 662 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001318100 662 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001318200 662 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001318300 662 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001318500 663 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001318600 663 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001318700 663 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001318800 663 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001319000 681 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001319100 681 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001319200 681 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001319300 681 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001319500 2853 QUARRYHILL AVE #1 CON $756.60
903 001319600 2853 QUARRYHILL AVE #2 CON $756.60
903 001319700 2853 QUARRYHILL AVE #3 CON $756.60
903 001319800 2853 QUARRYHILL AVE #4 CON $756.60
903 001320000 2811 QUARRYHILL AVE #1 CON $756.60
903 001320100 2811 QUARRYHILL AVE #2 CON $756.60
903 001320200 2811 QUARRYHILL AVE #3 CON $756.60
903 001320300 2811 QUARRYHILL AVE #4 CON $756.60
903 001320500 644 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001320600 644 HELIGAN LN #206 CON $756.60
903 001320700 644 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001320800 644 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001321000 626 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001321100 626 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001321200 626 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001321300 626 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001321500 627 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001321600 627 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001321700 627 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001321800 627 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001322000 645 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001322100 645 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001322200 645 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001322300 645 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001322500 582 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001322600 582 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001322700 582 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001322800 582 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001323000 576 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
641

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001323100 576 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001323200 576 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001323300 576 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001323500 674 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001323600 674 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001323700 674 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001323800 674 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001324000 652 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001324100 652 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001324200 652 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001324300 652 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001324500 630 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001324600 630 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001324700 630 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001324800 630 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001325000 564 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001325100 564 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001325200 564 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001325300 564 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001325500 556 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001325600 556 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001325700 556 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001325800 556 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001326000 548 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001326100 548 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001326200 548 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001326300 548 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001326500 530 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001326600 530 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001326700 530 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001326800 530 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001327000 525 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001327100 525 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001327200 525 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001327300 525 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001327500 549 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001327600 549 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001327700 549 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001327800 549 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001328000 557 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001328100 557 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001328200 557 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001328300 557 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001328500 563 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001328600 563 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001328700 563 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001328800 563 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001329000 577 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001329100 577 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001329200 577 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001329300 577 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001329500 581 SELBY LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001329600 581 SELBY LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001329700 581 SELBY LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001329800 581 SELBY LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001330000 655 HELIGAN LN #1 CON $756.60
903 001330100 655 HELIGAN LN #2 CON $756.60
903 001330200 655 HELIGAN LN #3 CON $756.60
903 001330300 655 HELIGAN LN #4 CON $756.60
903 001330500 2885 QUARRYHILL AVE #1 CON $756.60
903 001330600 2885 QUARRYHILL AVE #2 CON $756.60
903 001330700 2885 QUARRYHILL AVE #3 CON $756.60
903 001330800 2885 QUARRYHILL AVE #4 CON $756.60
903 001504200 502 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001504300 506 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001504400 508 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001504500 510 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001504600 514 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001504700 518 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001504900 249 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001505000 245 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001505100 241 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001505200 237 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001505300 233 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001505400 231 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001505600 520 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001505700 522 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001505800 526 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001505900 530 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001506000 534 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001506100 538 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001506300 275 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001506400 271 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001506500 269 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001506600 265 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001506700 261 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001506800 257 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001506900 253 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001507100 418 PERSIMMON CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001507200 418 PERSIMMON CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001507300 418 PERSIMMON CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001507400 418 PERSIMMON CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001507500 418 PERSIMMON CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001507600 418 PERSIMMON CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001507700 418 PERSIMMON CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001507800 418 PERSIMMON CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001507900 418 PERSIMMON CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001508000 418 PERSIMMON CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001508100 418 PERSIMMON CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001508200 418 PERSIMMON CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001508300 418 PERSIMMON CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001508400 418 PERSIMMON CMN #14 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
642

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001508600 333 BASSWOOD CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001508700 333 BASSWOOD CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001508800 333 BASSWOOD CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001508900 333 BASSWOOD CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001509000 333 BASSWOOD CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001509100 333 BASSWOOD CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001509200 333 BASSWOOD CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001509300 333 BASSWOOD CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001509400 333 BASSWOOD CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001509500 333 BASSWOOD CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001509600 333 BASSWOOD CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001509700 333 BASSWOOD CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001509800 333 BASSWOOD CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001509900 333 BASSWOOD CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001510000 333 BASSWOOD CMN #15 CON $756.60
903 001510200 347 BASSWOOD CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001510300 347 BASSWOOD CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001510400 347 BASSWOOD CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001510500 347 BASSWOOD CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001510600 347 BASSWOOD CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001510700 347 BASSWOOD CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001510800 347 BASSWOOD CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001510900 347 BASSWOOD CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001511000 347 BASSWOOD CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001511100 347 BASSWOOD CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001511200 347 BASSWOOD CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001511300 347 BASSWOOD CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001511400 347 BASSWOOD CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001511500 347 BASSWOOD CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001511600 347 BASSWOOD CMN #15 CON $756.60
903 001511800 400 PERSIMMON CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001511900 400 PERSIMMON CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001512000 400 PERSIMMON CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001512100 400 PERSIMMON CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001512200 400 PERSIMMON CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001512300 400 PERSIMMON CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001512400 400 PERSIMMON CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001512500 400 PERSIMMON CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001512600 400 PERSIMMON CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001512700 400 PERSIMMON CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001512800 400 PERSIMMON CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001512900 400 PERSIMMON CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001513000 400 PERSIMMON CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001513100 400 PERSIMMON CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001513300 319 BASSWOOD CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001513400 319 BASSWOOD CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001513500 319 BASSWOOD CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001513600 319 BASSWOOD CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001513700 319 BASSWOOD CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001513800 319 BASSWOOD CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001513900 319 BASSWOOD CMN #7 CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001514000 319 BASSWOOD CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001514100 319 BASSWOOD CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001514200 319 BASSWOOD CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001514300 319 BASSWOOD CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001514400 319 BASSWOOD CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001514500 319 BASSWOOD CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001514600 319 BASSWOOD CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001514700 319 BASSWOOD CMN #15 CON $756.60
903 001514900 120 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515000 114 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515100 108 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515200 102 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515400 126 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515500 132 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515600 138 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515700 144 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515800 148 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001515900 156 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516100 198 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516200 192 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516300 186 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516400 180 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516500 174 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516600 168 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516700 162 TEASEL CMN CON $756.60
903 001516900 240 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517000 244 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517100 248 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517200 252 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517300 256 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517400 260 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517500 268 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517700 210 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517800 214 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001517900 218 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001518000 222 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001518100 226 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001518200 230 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001518300 236 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001518500 301 BASSWOOD CMN CON $756.60
903 001518600 303 BASSWOOD CMN CON $756.60
903 001518700 305 BASSWOOD CMN CON $756.60
903 001518800 307 BASSWOOD CMN CON $756.60
903 001518900 309 BASSWOOD CMN CON $756.60
903 001519000 311 BASSWOOD CMN CON $756.60
903 001519200 270 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001519300 274 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001519400 280 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001519500 288 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001519600 292 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001519700 298 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
643

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001519900 225 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520000 223 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520100 221 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520200 219 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520300 217 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520400 215 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520500 211 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001520700 601 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001520800 601 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001520900 601 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001521000 601 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001521200 609 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001521300 609 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001521400 609 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001521500 609 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001521700 617 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001521800 617 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001521900 617 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001522000 617 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001522200 625 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001522300 625 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001522400 625 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001522500 625 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001602700 299 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001602800 295 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001602900 291 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001603000 287 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001603100 283 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001603200 279 FENNEL WAY CON $756.60
903 001603400 542 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001603500 546 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001603600 548 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001603700 550 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001603800 552 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001603900 554 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001604100 436 PERSIMMON CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001604200 436 PERSIMMON CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001604300 436 PERSIMMON CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001604400 436 PERSIMMON CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001604500 436 PERSIMMON CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001604600 436 PERSIMMON CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001604700 436 PERSIMMON CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001604800 436 PERSIMMON CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001604900 436 PERSIMMON CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001605000 436 PERSIMMON CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001605100 436 PERSIMMON CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001605200 436 PERSIMMON CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001605300 436 PERSIMMON CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001605400 436 PERSIMMON CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001605600 454 PERSIMMON CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001605700 454 PERSIMMON CMN #2 CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001605800 454 PERSIMMON CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001605900 454 PERSIMMON CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001606000 454 PERSIMMON CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001606100 454 PERSIMMON CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001606200 454 PERSIMMON CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001606300 454 PERSIMMON CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001606400 454 PERSIMMON CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001606500 454 PERSIMMON CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001606600 454 PERSIMMON CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001606700 454 PERSIMMON CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001606800 454 PERSIMMON CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001606900 454 PERSIMMON CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001607100 361 BASSWOOD CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001607200 361 BASSWOOD CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001607300 361 BASSWOOD CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001607400 361 BASSWOOD CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001607500 361 BASSWOOD CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001607600 361 BASSWOOD CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001607700 361 BASSWOOD CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001607800 361 BASSWOOD CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001607900 361 BASSWOOD CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001608000 361 BASSWOOD CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001608100 361 BASSWOOD CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001608200 361 BASSWOOD CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001608300 361 BASSWOOD CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001608400 361 BASSWOOD CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001608500 361 BASSWOOD CMN #15 CON $756.60
903 001608700 472 PERSIMMON CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001608800 472 PERSIMMON CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001608900 472 PERSIMMON CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001609000 472 PERSIMMON CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001609100 472 PERSIMMON CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001609200 472 PERSIMMON CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001609300 472 PERSIMMON CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001609400 472 PERSIMMON CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001609500 472 PERSIMMON CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001609600 472 PERSIMMON CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001609700 472 PERSIMMON CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001609800 472 PERSIMMON CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001609900 472 PERSIMMON CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001610000 472 PERSIMMON CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001610200 490 PERSIMMON CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001610300 490 PERSIMMON CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001610400 490 PERSIMMON CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001610500 490 PERSIMMON CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001610600 490 PERSIMMON CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001610700 490 PERSIMMON CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001610800 490 PERSIMMON CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001610900 490 PERSIMMON CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001611000 490 PERSIMMON CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001611100 490 PERSIMMON CMN #10 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
644

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001611200 490 PERSIMMON CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001611300 490 PERSIMMON CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001611400 490 PERSIMMON CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001611500 490 PERSIMMON CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001611700 375 BASSWOOD CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001611800 375 BASSWOOD CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001611900 375 BASSWOOD CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001612000 375 BASSWOOD CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001612100 375 BASSWOOD CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001612200 375 BASSWOOD CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001612300 375 BASSWOOD CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001612400 375 BASSWOOD CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001612500 375 BASSWOOD CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001612600 375 BASSWOOD CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001612700 375 BASSWOOD CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001612800 375 BASSWOOD CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001612900 375 BASSWOOD CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001613000 375 BASSWOOD CMN #14 CON $756.60
903 001613100 375 BASSWOOD CMN #15 CON $756.60
903 001613300 389 BASSWOOD CMN #1 CON $756.60
903 001613400 389 BASSWOOD CMN #2 CON $756.60
903 001613500 389 BASSWOOD CMN #3 CON $756.60
903 001613600 389 BASSWOOD CMN #4 CON $756.60
903 001613700 389 BASSWOOD CMN #5 CON $756.60
903 001613800 389 BASSWOOD CMN #6 CON $756.60
903 001613900 389 BASSWOOD CMN #7 CON $756.60
903 001614000 389 BASSWOOD CMN #8 CON $756.60
903 001614100 389 BASSWOOD CMN #9 CON $756.60
903 001614200 389 BASSWOOD CMN #10 CON $756.60
903 001614300 389 BASSWOOD CMN #11 CON $756.60
903 001614400 389 BASSWOOD CMN #12 CON $756.60
903 001614500 389 BASSWOOD CMN #13 CON $756.60
903 001614700 586 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001614800 588 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001614900 590 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615000 592 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615100 594 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615200 596 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615300 598 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615500 570 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615600 574 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615700 576 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615800 578 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001615900 580 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616000 582 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616100 584 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616300 556 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616400 558 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616500 560 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616600 562 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001616700 564 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001616800 568 SANDALWOOD DR CON $756.60
903 001705500 700 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001705600 700 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001705700 700 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001705800 700 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001706000 708 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001706100 708 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001706200 708 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001706300 708 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001706500 716 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001706600 716 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001706700 716 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001706800 716 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001707000 724 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001707100 724 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001707200 724 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001707300 724 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001707500 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001707600 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001707700 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001707800 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001707900 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001708000 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001708100 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001708200 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001708300 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001708400 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001708500 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001708600 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001708700 801 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
903 001708900 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
903 001709000 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001709100 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001709200 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001709300 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001709400 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001709500 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001709600 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001709700 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001709800 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001709900 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001710000 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001710100 817 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001710300 780 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001710400 780 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001710500 780 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001710600 780 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001710800 788 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001710900 788 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001711000 788 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001711100 788 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
645

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001711300 796 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001711400 796 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001711500 796 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001711600 796 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001711800 689 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001711900 689 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001712000 689 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001712100 689 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001712300 697 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001712400 697 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001712500 697 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001712600 697 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001712800 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001712900 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001713000 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001713100 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001713200 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001713300 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001713400 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001713500 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001713600 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001713700 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001713800 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001713900 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001714000 833 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
903 001714200 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
903 001714300 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001714400 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001714500 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001714600 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001714700 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001714800 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001714900 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001715000 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001715100 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001715200 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001715300 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001715400 849 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001715600 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001715700 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001715800 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001715900 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001716000 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001716100 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001716200 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001716300 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001716400 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001716500 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001716600 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001716700 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001716800 865 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001717000 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
903 001717100 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001717200 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001717300 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001717400 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001717500 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001717600 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001717700 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001717800 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001717900 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001718000 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001718100 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001718200 881 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001718400 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001718500 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001718600 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001718700 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001718800 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #5 CON $756.60
903 001718900 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #6 CON $756.60
903 001719000 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #7 CON $756.60
903 001719100 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #8 CON $756.60
903 001719200 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #9 CON $756.60
903 001719300 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #10 CON $756.60
903 001719400 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #11 CON $756.60
903 001719500 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #12 CON $756.60
903 001719600 897 TRANQUILITY CIR #13 CON $756.60
903 001719800 665 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001719900 665 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001720000 665 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001720100 665 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001720300 673 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001720400 673 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001720500 673 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001720600 673 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001720800 681 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001720900 681 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001721000 681 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001721100 681 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001721300 633 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001721400 633 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001721500 633 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001721600 633 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001721800 641 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001721900 641 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001722000 641 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001722100 641 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001722300 649 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60
903 001722400 649 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001722500 649 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001722600 649 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001722800 657 SANDALWOOD DR #1 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
646

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001722900 657 SANDALWOOD DR #2 CON $756.60
903 001723000 657 SANDALWOOD DR #3 CON $756.60
903 001723100 657 SANDALWOOD DR #4 CON $756.60
903 001723300 732 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001723400 732 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001723500 732 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001723600 732 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001723800 740 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001723900 740 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001724000 740 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001724100 740 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001724300 748 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001724400 748 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001724500 748 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001724600 748 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001724800 756 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001724900 756 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001725000 756 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001725100 756 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001725300 764 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001725400 764 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001725500 764 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001725600 764 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001725800 772 TRANQUILITY CIR #1 CON $756.60
903 001725900 772 TRANQUILITY CIR #2 CON $756.60
903 001726000 772 TRANQUILITY CIR #3 CON $756.60
903 001726100 772 TRANQUILITY CIR #4 CON $756.60
903 001804200 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001804400 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001804500 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001804600 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001804900 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001805200 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001805300 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001805400 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001805500 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001805800 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001806200 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001806500 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001806900 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001807000 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001807100 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001807200 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001807500 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001807800 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001807900 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001808000 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001808200 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001808300 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001808500 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001808600 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
903 001808700 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001808900 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001809000 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
903 001809100 PORTOLA AVE SFR $935.88
905 001100400 285 BELLINGTON CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001100500 285 BELLINGTON CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001100600 285 BELLINGTON CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001100700 285 BELLINGTON CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001100900 253 BELLINGTON CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001101000 253 BELLINGTON CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001101100 253 BELLINGTON CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001101200 253 BELLINGTON CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001101400 161 BELLINGTON CMN #7 CON $756.60
905 001101500 161 BELLINGTON CMN CON $756.60
905 001101600 161 BELLINGTON CMN #5 CON $756.60
905 001101700 161 BELLINGTON CMN #8 CON $756.60
905 001101800 161 BELLINGTON CMN CON $756.60
905 001101900 161 BELLINGTON CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001102000 161 BELLINGTON CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001102100 161 BELLINGTON CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001102300 276 WILDROSE CMN #7 CON $756.60
905 001102400 276 WILDROSE CMN #6 CON $756.60
905 001102500 276 WILDROSE CMN #5 CON $756.60
905 001102600 276 WILDROSE CMN #8 CON $756.60
905 001102700 276 WILDROSE CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001102800 276 WILDROSE CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001102900 276 WILDROSE CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001103000 276 WILDROSE CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001103200 292 WILDROSE CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001103300 292 WILDROSE CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001103400 292 WILDROSE CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001103500 292 WILDROSE CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001103700 289 WILDROSE CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001103800 289 WILDROSE CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001103900 289 WILDROSE CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001104000 289 WILDROSE CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001104200 255 WILDROSE CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001104300 255 WILDROSE CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001104400 255 WILDROSE CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001104500 255 WILDROSE CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001104600 255 WILDROSE CMN #5 CON $756.60
905 001104700 255 WILDROSE CMN #6 CON $756.60
905 001104800 255 WILDROSE CMN #7 CON $756.60
905 001104900 255 WILDROSE CMN #8 CON $756.60
905 001105400 224 BELLINGTON CMN #301 CON $756.60
905 001105500 224 BELLINGTON CMN #302 CON $756.60
905 001105600 224 BELLINGTON CMN #5 CON $756.60
905 001105700 224 BELLINGTON CMN #304 CON $756.60
905 001105800 224 BELLINGTON CMN #305 CON $756.60
905 001105900 224 BELLINGTON CMN #306 CON $756.60
905 001106000 224 BELLINGTON CMN #307 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
647

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
905 001106100 224 BELLINGTON CMN #308 CON $756.60
905 001202500 298 WINDWARD CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001202600 298 WINDWARD CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001202700 298 WINDWARD CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001202800 298 WINDWARD CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001203000 3179 CALIMANCO CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001203100 3179 CALIMANCO CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001203200 3179 CALIMANCO CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001203300 3179 CALIMANCO CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001203500 3188 CALIMANCO CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001203600 3188 CALIMANCO CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001203700 3188 CALIMANCO CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001203800 3188 CALIMANCO CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001204000 330 WINDWARD CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001204100 330 WINDWARD CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001204200 330 WINDWARD CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001204300 330 WINDWARD CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001204600 265 WINDWARD CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001204700 265 WINDWARD CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001204800 265 WINDWARD CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001204900 265 WINDWARD CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001205000 265 WINDWARD CMN #8 CON $756.60
905 001205100 265 WINDWARD CMN #5 CON $756.60
905 001205200 265 WINDWARD CMN #6 CON $756.60
905 001205300 265 WINDWARD CMN #7 CON $756.60
905 001205500 3123 FOUR HILL CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001205600 3123 FOUR HILL CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001205700 3123 FOUR HILL CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001205800 3123 FOUR HILL CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001206000 3136 FOUR HILL CMN #2 CON $756.60
905 001206100 3136 FOUR HILL CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001206200 3136 FOUR HILL CMN #4 CON $756.60
905 001206300 3136 FOUR HILL CMN #1 CON $756.60
905 001206500 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001206600 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001206700 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001206800 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001206900 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001207000 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001207100 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001207200 214 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001207400 3155 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001207500 3155 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001207600 3155 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001207700 3155 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001207900 3162 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001208000 3162 GOLDEN CREST CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001208100 3162 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001208200 3162 GOLDEN CREST CMN CON $756.60
905 001208400 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001208500 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
905 001208600 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001208700 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001208800 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001208900 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209000 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209100 139 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209300 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209400 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209500 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209600 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209700 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209800 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001209900 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001210000 102 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001210200 122 WILDROSE CMN CON $756.60
905 001210300 122 WILDROSE CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001210400 122 WILDROSE CMN CON $756.60
905 001210500 122 WILDROSE CMN CON $756.60
905 001210700 110 WILDROSE CMN CON $756.60
905 001210800 110 WILDROSE CMN CON $756.60
905 001210900 110 WILDROSE CMN CON $756.60
905 001211000 110 WILDROSE CMN #1804 CON $756.60
905 001211200 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211300 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211400 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211500 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211600 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211700 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211800 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001211900 95 WINDWARD CMN CON $756.60
905 001212100 187 WILDROSE CMN #1201 CON $756.60
905 001212200 187 WILDROSE CMN #1202 CON $756.60
905 001212300 187 WILDROSE CMN #1203 CON $756.60
905 001212400 187 WILDROSE CMN #1204 CON $756.60
905 001212600 145 WILDROSE CMN #1301 CON $756.60
905 001212700 145 WILDROSE CMN #1302 CON $756.60
905 001212800 145 WILDROSE CMN #1303 CON $756.60
905 001212900 145 WILDROSE CMN #1304 CON $756.60
905 001213000 145 WILDROSE CMN #1305 CON $756.60
905 001213100 145 WILDROSE CMN #1306 CON $756.60
905 001213200 145 WILDROSE CMN #1307 CON $756.60
905 001213300 145 WILDROSE CMN #1308 CON $756.60
905 001213500 3120 ARCADIA CMN #401 CON $756.60
905 001213600 3120 ARCADIA CMN #402 CON $756.60
905 001213700 3120 ARCADIA CMN #403 CON $756.60
905 001213800 3120 ARCADIA CMN #404 CON $756.60
905 001214000 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1601 CON $756.60
905 001214100 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1602 CON $756.60
905 001214200 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1603 CON $756.60
905 001214300 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1604 CON $756.60
905 001214400 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1605 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
648

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
905 001214500 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1606 CON $756.60
905 001214600 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1607 CON $756.60
905 001214700 3131 ARCADIA CMN #1608 CON $756.60
905 001214900 51 BELLINGTON CMN #501 CON $756.60
905 001215000 51 BELLINGTON CMN #502 CON $756.60
905 001215100 51 BELLINGTON CMN #503 CON $756.60
905 001215200 51 BELLINGTON CMN #504 CON $756.60
905 001215300 51 BELLINGTON CMN #505 CON $756.60
905 001215400 51 BELLINGTON CMN #506 CON $756.60
905 001215500 51 BELLINGTON CMN #507 CON $756.60
905 001215600 51 BELLINGTON CMN #508 CON $756.60
905 001215800 230 WILDROSE CMN #601 CON $756.60
905 001215900 230 WILDROSE CMN #602 CON $756.60
905 001216000 230 WILDROSE CMN #603 CON $756.60
905 001216100 230 WILDROSE CMN #604 CON $756.60
905 001216300 211 WILDROSE CMN #1101 CON $756.60
905 001216400 211 WILDROSE CMN #3 CON $756.60
905 001216500 211 WILDROSE CMN #1103 CON $756.60
905 001216600 211 WILDROSE CMN #1104 CON $756.60
905 001216700 211 WILDROSE CMN #1105 CON $756.60
905 001216800 211 WILDROSE CMN #1106 CON $756.60
905 001216900 211 WILDROSE CMN #1107 CON $756.60
905 001217000 211 WILDROSE CMN #1108 CON $756.60
905 001217200 26 BELLINGTON CMN #1501 CON $756.60
905 001217300 26 BELLINGTON CMN #1502 CON $756.60
905 001217400 26 BELLINGTON CMN #1503 CON $756.60
905 001217500 26 BELLINGTON CMN #1504 CON $756.60
905 001300700 7 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001300800 7 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001300900 7 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001301000 7 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001301100 7 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001301300 15 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001301400 15 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001301500 15 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001301600 15 MERITAGE CMN #204 CON $756.60
905 001301700 15 MERITAGE CMN #205 CON $756.60
905 001301900 27 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001302000 27 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001302100 27 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001302200 27 MERITAGE CMN #107 CON $756.60
905 001302300 27 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001302400 27 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001302500 27 MERITAGE CMN #205 CON $756.60
905 001302700 35 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001302800 35 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001302900 35 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001303000 35 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001303100 35 MERITAGE CMN #205 CON $756.60
905 001303300 32 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001303400 32 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
905 001303500 32 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001303600 32 MERITAGE CMN #106 CON $756.60
905 001303700 32 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001303800 32 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001303900 32 MERITAGE CMN #204 CON $756.60
905 001304100 24 MERITAGE CMN #1401 CON $756.60
905 001304200 24 MERITAGE CMN #1402 CON $756.60
905 001304300 24 MERITAGE CMN #1403 CON $756.60
905 001304400 24 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001304500 24 MERITAGE CMN #1405 CON $756.60
905 001304700 49 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001304800 49 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001304900 49 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001305000 49 MERITAGE CMN #107 CON $756.60
905 001305100 49 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001305200 49 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001305400 57 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001305500 57 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001305600 57 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001305700 57 MERITAGE CMN #107 CON $756.60
905 001305800 57 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001305900 57 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001306000 57 MERITAGE CMN #205 CON $756.60
905 001306200 63 MERITAGE CMN #107 CON $756.60
905 001306300 63 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001306400 63 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001306500 63 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001306600 63 MERITAGE CMN #205 CON $756.60
905 001306700 63 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001306800 63 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001307000 60 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001307100 60 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
905 001307200 60 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001307300 60 MERITAGE CMN #106 CON $756.60
905 001307400 60 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001307500 60 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001307600 60 MERITAGE CMN #204 CON $756.60
905 001307800 54 MERITAGE CMN #106 CON $756.60
905 001307900 54 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001308000 54 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
905 001308100 54 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001308200 54 MERITAGE CMN #204 CON $756.60
905 001308300 54 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001308400 54 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001308600 46 MERITAGE CMN #106 CON $756.60
905 001308700 46 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001308800 46 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
905 001308900 46 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001309000 46 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001309100 46 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001309300 79 MERITAGE CMN #107 CON $756.60

EXHIBIT A
649

CITY OF LIVERMORE SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
Final Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27
(Parcel Number Order)
Assessor's
Parcel No. Amount
Property
Address Class
905 001309400 79 MERITAGE CMN #105 CON $756.60
905 001309500 79 MERITAGE CMN #103 CON $756.60
905 001309600 79 MERITAGE CMN #101 CON $756.60
905 001309700 79 MERITAGE CMN #203 CON $756.60
905 001309800 79 MERITAGE CMN #201 CON $756.60
905 001310000 76 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001310100 76 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
905 001310200 76 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001310300 76 MERITAGE CMN #106 CON $756.60
905 001310400 76 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001310500 76 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001310700 10 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001310800 10 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
905 001310900 10 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001311000 10 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001311100 10 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001311300 2 MERITAGE CMN #104 CON $756.60
905 001311400 2 MERITAGE CMN #102 CON $756.60
905 001311500 2 MERITAGE CMN #100 CON $756.60
905 001311600 2 MERITAGE CMN #202 CON $756.60
905 001311700 2 MERITAGE CMN #200 CON $756.60
905 001902300 TRIAD DR SFR $935.88
905 001902400 TRIAD DR SFR $935.88
905 001903400 TRIAD DR SFR $935.88
905 001903900 TRIAD DR SFR $935.88
905 001905000 TRIAD DR SFR $935.88
Totals: 27,260 $28,092,106.68

EXHIBIT A
650
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7.3
DATE: July 27, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Hearing to consider resolutions to certify the General Plan Environmental Impact Report and approve Livermore General Plan 2045 establishing a long-term vision, goals, policies, implementation actions and land use designations to guide future decisionmaking related to growth, development, and resource conservation through 2045, and introduce an ordinance and waive the first reading to adopt conforming Zoning Map Amendments ensuring consistency with the General Plan Land Use Map.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Planning Commission and Staff recommend the City Council:

Adopt a resolution certifying the General Plan 2045 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR); Adopt a resolution approving Livermore General Plan 2045, subject to the revisions identified in the Errata Sheet dated July 7, 2026 (GPA 21-003);
Introduce an Ordinance and waive the first reading adopting conforming amendments to the Livermore Zoning Map (ZMA 26-001); and
Adopt a resolution retaining Existing General Plan Scenic Corridor Policies under separate cover until new Scenic Resources standards are considered and adopted at a future date to be determined (POL 26-002).

SUMMARY
The Livermore General Plan 2045 (General Plan) establishes a long-term vision, goals, policies, and implementation actions to guide decision-making over the next 20 years. Developed through an extensive public engagement process from 2021 to 2026, the General Plan addresses State-required and locally significant topics such as land use, housing, mobility, infrastructure, and economic development. The General Plan builds on longstanding priorities such as open space, Downtown and South Livermore vitality, and multimodal transportation, while introducing new emphasis on climate resilience, environmental justice, and healthy communities.

In May 2026, the City Council reviewed the Draft General Plan, approved revisions recommended by the Planning Commission, and directed Staff to proceed with adoption with additional minor revisions. Since 651
that time, Staff prepared minor amendments to the Land Use Map and policy language to provide greater clarity and respond to needs of property owners. The proposed General Plan is supported by a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and is intended to provide a balanced decision-making framework while accommodating State-mandated housing requirements, managing community resources, and advancing Livermore’s long-term vision. The General Plan and Final EIR are available at www.ImagineLivermore2045.org. Planning Commission and Staff recommend Council certify the General Plan EIR, adopt the General Plan with the proposed revisions, and amend the Livermore Zoning Map for consistency.

DISCUSSION
GENERAL PLAN 2045 OVERVIEW
The General Plan includes a vision, description of key community issues, goals, and policies that guide how the City will address those issues and is supported by maps and diagrams. The General Plan covers all State-required topics and additional locally important themes identified by the community. The document also includes an Implementation Plan, which identifies specific actions the City can take to prioritize work programs, allocate resources, and ensure decisions are aligned with the community’s long-term vision. Together the General Plan’s, goals, policies, and actions provide guidance and manage resources over the next 20 years.

COUNCIL DIRECTION ON DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045
On May 11, 2026, the City Council received a presentation on the Draft General Plan 2045, including a summary of the community feedback and General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) and Planning Commission recommendations. For a summary, please refer to the May 11, 2026, City Council Staff Report, Attachment 1. The City Council directed Staff to incorporate the Planning Commission recommended revisions in addition to additional Council edits, into General Plan 2045, which are summarized in Attachment 12 (Exhibit C - General Plan Errata Sheet).

RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN ADJUSTMENTS
Planning Commission and Staff recommend additional updates to the General Plan to improve clarity, support future development, and better align land use designations with existing conditions, which are also included in Attachment 12 (Exhibit C - General Plan Errata Sheet).

Midtown: The Planning Commission recommends redesignating approximately 40 acres owned by McGrath RentCorp to Service Commercial to support ongoing business operations while preserving flexibility for future redevelopment consistent with Council direction. In addition, the Commission recommends adding a new General Plan policy clarifying that existing zoning will remain in effect until a Midtown Specific Plan is adopted, reducing uncertainty for property owners and the real estate community. Finally, Staff will present a proposed amendment to the existing Development Agreement with McGrath RentCorp as a separate item for City Council consideration, which offers the property owner certainty, flexibility, and continuity of operations.

Las Colinas/Adventus: The Planning Commission recommends revising the land use designations to include a combination of Medium Density Residential (MDR2/MDR3) floating designation and a High Density Residential (HDR1) designation. These designations would provide greater flexibility for housing 652
types, improve compatibility with surrounding development, and create additional opportunities for affordable housing. The General Plan requires a future Neighborhood Plan to establish the site's layout, building design, circulation, and inform appropriate transitions and neighborhood compatibility. A proposed Development Agreement will be presented separately for City Council consideration. 305 South Vasco Road and 5958 Brisa Street: The Planning Commission recommends changing the land use designation for an approximately 3.6-acre vacant site from Neighborhood Commercial to General Industrial. Because the property is surrounded by industrial uses and is restricted from residential development through existing agreements, the redesignation would better support employment-generating uses and improve compatibility with adjacent properties.

Camden Commons/Cole Commons: The Planning Commission recommends correcting a mapping error by changing the land use designation for the existing townhome development from Neighborhood MixedUse High Density to Medium Density Residential 3 (MDR3). This correction aligns the General Plan with the site's existing residential use.

CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO LIVERMORE ZONING MAP
Planning Commission recommends conforming amendments to the Zoning Map to maintain consistency between the City's Zoning Map and the General Plan upon its adoption, as required by State law. The proposed amendments are based on the Draft General Plan Land Use Map authorized by the City Council in February 2025, which included updated land use categories, property owner requests, and Staff-recommended adjustments to better align land use designations with existing uses. In addition, the proposed Zoning Map amendments incorporate the land use map refinements described above and identified in the Errata Sheet (Midtown, Las Colinas, and 305 Vasco Road Areas). Attachment 15 (Exhibit B - Proposed Zoning Map) illustrates the proposed Zoning Map, and Attachment 3 (Proposed Change Areas) identifies the areas where zoning alignments are proposed.

SCENIC RESOURCES IMPLEMENTATION
General Plan 2045 includes policies that support the protection of scenic resources while balancing community and economic development objectives. During the General Plan update process, the City Council directed that the General Plan retain high-level policy statements and that implementing regulations be removed from the General Plan and incorporated into the appropriate planning documents such as the Livermore Development Code. The Scenic Resources Policies and Actions identify future amendments to the Development Code to establish scenic overlay districts and implementing regulations. Until such time as a Scenic Overlay or other implementing regulations are adopted, Planning Commission recommends maintaining the existing Scenic Corridor Policies as a separate document (Attachment 18: Exhibit B - Scenic Resources Policy).

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Staff have prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) (Attachment 6: Exhibit B - Link to General Plan 2045 Final EIR) for General Plan 2045, in response to public and agency comments received on the Draft EIR.

On March 3, 2026, the City issued a Notice of Availability and circulated the Draft EIR for public review and comment. The Draft EIR was distributed to local, regional, and State agencies, as well as interested 653
parties, published in a newspaper of general circulation, and made available for review on the General Plan 2045 website at www.ImagineLivermore2045.org. On March 17, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft EIR. Written comments were accepted throughout the 53-day public review period, which concluded on April 24, 2026.

In addition to oral comments received at the public hearing, the City received 13 comment letters during the public review period, including 4 from government agencies and 9 from members of the public. The Final EIR includes revisions to the Draft EIR and responses to all comments received. To address recurring issues, the Final EIR includes master responses on (1) Standards for Responses and Focus of Review and (2) Population Growth. The Standards for Responses and Focus of Review master response explains that CEQA requires responses to comments on environmental issues but does not require responses to comments on the merits of the project. The Population Growth master response clarifies that the population assumptions used in the Draft EIR are not growth targets or forecasts, but rather a conservative buildout scenario based on the amount of growth the City must plan for under State law and regional planning requirements.

Chapter 3 of the Final EIR includes revisions to the Draft EIR that consist primarily of clarifications, corrections, and updated information, including:

Revisions to tribal cultural resources mitigation measures Clarifications to proposed General Plan policies and the Land Use Map Updated references for regional planning documents
Updated school enrollment and capacity information from the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
Addition of transportation regulations
Correction of a typographical error in the projected water demand table Clarification of projected buildout under the proposed project and Alternative A Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, recirculation is required only when a Draft EIR contains “significant new information,” such as a new significant impact, a substantial increase in the severity of an impact, a feasible but unadopted alternative or mitigation measure that would clearly reduce impacts, or when the Draft EIR is so inadequate that meaningful public review is precluded. The revisions included in the Final EIR do not meet these thresholds, and recirculation is not required.

The EIR identifies significant and unavoidable impacts related to Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Mineral Resources, and Noise that cannot be mitigated to a less-thansignificant level. Accordingly, certification of the EIR includes adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment 7). The Statement of Overriding Considerations concludes that the benefits of General Plan 2045 outweigh these unavoidable environmental impacts. Key benefits include extending the City's planning horizon and updating policies to meet State requirements; supporting infill development to accommodate future housing needs and economic growth; protecting resources while providing adequate infrastructure and public services; promoting long-term fiscal sustainability through efficient development patterns; and fostering a diverse and resilient local economy.

Finally, the Final EIR includes a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to identify the timing and responsible party for each mitigation measure in the EIR (Attachment 8).

IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE WORK PROGRAMS
654
Following the adoption of the General Plan 2045 Update, Staff anticipates bringing forward the following implementation work programs for City Council review and consideration:

Livermore Development Code Conforming Amendments: update purpose statements, permitted uses, and nonresidential development standards in conventional Zoning Districts in alignment with new General Plan policy
Scenic Resources Overlay District: create associated development standards to protect scenic resources in balance with other city objectives and new General Plan policies Business Ready Initiative: support business attraction, retention, and growth through improved permitting and fee processes and strategic partnerships Vasco Row District Plan, Downtown and South Livermore Valley Specific Plan Updates: expand economic development opportunities, support local businesses, increase visitation, and encourage investment
Missing Middle Housing Standards and Incentives: broaden housing options while maintaining neighborhood compatibility
Active Transportation Plan and Standard Details Updates: codify bicycle and pedestrian facility design standards among other ATP updates
Noise Ordinance: revisions to update, improve clarity and implementation Development Impact Fees Update: respond to infrastructure needs identified in General Plan 2045 Staff anticipate commencing these implementation initiatives in late 2026 and early 2027, pending City Council direction.

PLANNING COMMISSION
On July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider Livermore General Plan 2045, General Plan Environmental Impact Report, Zoning Map Amendments and Scenic Resources Polices, public testimony, and required findings (Commission meeting minutes are Attachment 2). There were no public comments received at the hearing on this item. The Planning Commission adopted resolutions recommending that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report in accordance with CEQA, adopt Livermore General Plan 2045, adopt an ordinance amending the Zoning District Map, and adopt Scenic Resources Policies document under separate cover.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The General Plan Update was an approximate 5-year work program that required Staff involvement from across the organization at all levels, including time spent administering the consultant agreement, reviewing documents, conducting research and analysis, and supporting community outreach. The General Plan Update consultant contract began on July 1, 2021, and supported this multi-year effort at a total consultant cost of approximately $3 million. The contract term remains effective through March 2027. Following adoption, Staff and the consultant team will work to provide an accessible online version of the General Plan, in addition to static PDF and paper copies located at City Hall.

The Draft General Plan envisions a 20-year buildout to the horizon year 2045. Based on the feasible development scenario prepared and analyzed by the project team, the General Plan 2045 is anticipated to provide sufficient resources (e.g. tax revenue and impact fees) to cover the cost of public services 655
under existing service standards.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

4. Inclusive and Inviting Spaces and Places
GOAL

4. Continue to complete the General Plan Update

ATTACHMENTS

1. CC May 11 GPU Staff Report

2. PC July 7 2026 Draft Meeting Minutes

3. Proposed Change Areas

4. Resolution - EIR

5. Exhibit A - PC Reso 11-26 General Plan EIR

6. Exhibit B - Link to General Plan 2045 Final EIR

7. Exhibit C - Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations

8. Exhibit D - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

9. Resolution - General Plan 2045 Adoption

10. Exhibit A - PC Reso 12-26 General Plan adoption

11. Exhibit B - Link to Livermore Draft General Plan 2045

12. Exhibit C - Errata Sheet

13. Ordinance

14. Exhibit A - PC Reso 13-26 General Plan Zoning Map

15. Exhibit B - Proposed Zoning Map

16. Resolution - Scenic Resources

17. Exhibit A - PC Reso 14-26 General Plan Scenic Resources

18. Exhibit B - Scenic Resources Policy
Prepared by: Andy Ross
Principal Planner
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Kristen Hilton
Acting Administrative Services Director
656
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 8.1
DATE: May 11, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Comprehensive General Plan Update – Draft General Plan 2045

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council:

Receive a presentation on the Draft General Plan 2045;
Consider community, General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), and Planning Commission feedback on the Draft General Plan 2045; and
Provide direction on any changes or revisions that should be incorporated into the Draft General Plan 2045.

SUMMARY
The Draft Livermore General Plan 2045 (Draft General Plan) updates the City’s existing 2003 General Plan to reflect current community priorities, address key challenges, and guide decision-making over the next 20 years. Shaped by extensive public engagement from 2021 to 2026, the Draft General Plan establishes a comprehensive framework of goals, policies, and implementation actions across Staterequired and locally significant topics such as land use, housing, mobility, infrastructure, and economic development.

The Draft General Plan builds on long-standing priorities like preserving open space, supporting downtown and South Livermore vitality, and promoting multimodal transportation, while introducing new emphasis on climate resilience, environmental justice, and healthy communities. Supported by an Environmental Impact Report and ongoing public input, the Draft General Plan is intended to ensure consistent and balanced decision-making in alignment with Livermore’s long-term vision, while addressing state-mandated requirements, such as planning for future housing growth.

The Draft General Plan is available at www.ImagineLivermore2045.org.

Staff recommends the City Council review the Draft General Plan and provide direction on revisions that should be incorporated into the Draft General Plan.

ATTACHMENT 1
657

DISCUSSION
DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045 PROCESS
The Draft General Plan updates the 2003 General Plan to reflect community priorities, address key issues facing the City, support future decision-making, and improve overall organization and clarity. The Draft General Plan is shaped by input received through more than 50 community events (a combination of workshops, staff presentations, property owner meetings, pop-up events, and a communitywide survey), 36 General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) meetings, seven Planning Commission meetings, and eight City Council meetings from 2021 through 2026. The Draft General Plan is a culmination of community, GPAC, and Planning Commission feedback and, ultimately, City Council direction.

DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045 OVERVIEW
The Draft General Plan includes a Vision, description of key community issues, goals and policies that guide how the City will address those issues, and it is supported by maps and diagrams. The Draft General Plan covers all State-required topics and additional locally important themes identified by the community. The document also includes an Implementation Plan, which identifies specific actions the City can take to prioritize work programs, allocate resources, and ensure decisions are aligned with the community’s long-term vision. Together, the Draft General Plan’s goals, policies, and actions provide guidance to the City on how to direct change and manage resources over the next 20 years.

The Draft General Plan is made up of the following elements (an asterisk “*” indicates the element is State required):

Land Use*: Determines the types and locations of future uses and development of land in Livermore and establishes policy guidance more broadly for land uses within the Sphere of Influence (SOI) and Planning Area.

Community Identity: Provides information about the unique qualities of Livermore, including civic life and governance, social interactions, arts and culture, the natural setting, urban design, scenic resources and gateways, lighting and glare, cultural and historic resources, and establishes policy guidance to identify, protect, and enhance these systems and features.

Mobility (Circulation)*: Establishes policy guidance for transportation systems and the movement of people and goods within the community, including roadway safety, public transit systems, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, parking facilities, air transportation, goods movement, emerging transportation technology, and identifies system improvements necessary to meet existing and projected needs.

Housing*: Identifies housing needs for residents of all income levels and establishes an action program to meet those needs, including planning for and requiring new affordable housing, preserving existing affordable housing, ensuring equal opportunity to access housing, collaborating regionally to address housing needs, and supporting energy efficiency in existing and new homes. The Housing Element is updated on a separate schedule from the rest of the General Plan to meet the requirements of State housing laws. The current 2023-2031 Housing Element is available under separate cover on the City of Livermore’s website and will not be modified as part of the General Plan 2045.

Infrastructure: Establishes policy guidance to maintain adequate infrastructure service levels, including water facilities and delivery, wastewater collection and treatment, and stormwater ATTACHMENT 1
658
capture and management.

Community Services: Establishes policy guidance to support adequate access to services such as schools, childcare, solid waste disposal, healthcare and healthy food, libraries, and programs intended to support aging adults.

Open Space and Conservation*: Establishes policy guidance to conserve and protect open space and natural and agricultural resources, including park and recreation facilities in Livermore.

Noise*: Quantifies current and projected noise levels from a variety of sources, explains impacts associated with noise, and establishes policies to inform land use decision-making to address current and foreseeable noise impacts.

Safety*: Establishes law enforcement, emergency preparedness, and emergency response policies to ensure a safe community and protection from risks associated with the effects of seismic hazards, other geologic hazards, flooding, and wildland and urban fires.

Economic Development: Establishes policy guidance to facilitate and maintain a balanced mix of economic activity and a variety of economic sectors throughout the community to support the fiscal vitality of Livermore.

The Draft General Plan carries forward important ideas and concepts in Livermore's current General Plan and other long-standing planning efforts:

Maintaining and strengthening Downtown as the heart of the community Facilitating Infill Development consistent with the Urban Growth Boundary Protecting the natural environment and preservation of open space Promoting agricultural conservation and economic vitality of South Livermore Supporting bicycling, walking, and public transit as modes of travel The Draft General Plan 2045 also introduces new approaches and areas of emphasis to General Plan topics and opportunities:

Climate Resilience and Sustainability addresses climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas reduction, water conservation, and sustainable development through policies integrated throughout the Draft General Plan and denoted with an icon.

Environmental Justice ensures all residents have access to services and safe and healthy places to live and play. Policies are woven into all elements of the Draft General Plan and denoted with an icon.

Economic Development emphasizes Livermore’s diverse economy by strengthening existing businesses and facilitating the growth of an innovation, visitation, and craft economy.

Community Identity celebrates Livermore's unique qualities shaped by science, agriculture, and arts.

Healthy Communities addresses access to healthcare, healthy food, childcare, and services for aging adults.

COUNCIL POLICY DIRECTION
On April 28, 2025, the City Council directed that General Plan policy language should remain at a higher level of abstraction, and detailed strategies should be incorporated into the appropriate implementation documents (such as the Development Code). Following Council direction, staff prepared the complete set of draft goals and policies, which are published as part of the Draft General Plan 2045.

ATTACHMENT 1
659
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ON THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045
Following publication of the Draft General Plan on February 20, 2026, City staff have undertaken outreach efforts to inform the community and gather feedback, as summarized in Table 1. As of April 30, 2026, approximately 181 people have provided feedback on the Draft General Plan 2045. (Some have provided comments more than once). Attachment 1 provides a summary of community input received to date. Based on the open house, online tool, and written comments, some of the emerging themes from the community feedback on the Draft General Plan include:

Maintain and protect retail and industrial uses.

Protect open space and agricultural resources.

Provide a variety of housing types affordable to different incomes.

Plan for a multimodal transportation system.

Projected population growth appears higher than expected.

Table 1: Draft General Plan 2045 Outreach Activities and Comments Outreach Activity Date Number of
Participants
Draft General Plan 2045 Online
Commenting Tool at
www.ImagineLivermore2045.org
Published February 20, 2026 4
Public Hearing on the General Plan 2045
Environmental Impact Report March 17, 2026 3
Open House at Robert Livermore
Community Center March 18, 2026 30
Draft General Plan 2045 Informational
Video Published March 18, 2026 n/a
Draft General Plan 2045 Executive
Summary Published March 19, 2026 4
GPAC Meeting on Draft General Plan
2045 April 1, 2026 4
Pop-up Events at Farmers’ Market April 9, 2026 15
Bilingual Intercept Outreach by La Familia
(local Community Based Organization) March and April 2026 100 Planning Commission Meeting on Draft
General Plan 2045 April 21, 2026 7
Emails February through April 2026 14
GPAC FEEDBACK ON THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045
On April 1, 2026, the GPAC provided a range of comments and recommended adoption of the General Plan 2045. A summary of the GPAC meeting and feedback is included as Attachment 2. Some of the overarching themes that emerged from the GPAC’s discussion included:

Clarification that no new land uses are proposed for the east of Greenville future study area.

Emphasized planning a future Midtown Specific Plan area that would not be dependent upon future Valley Link service.

Expressed the importance of keeping the General Plan at a high level to maintain flexibility in responding to evolving needs and technologies.

ATTACHMENT 1
660
The General Plan highlights the importance of South Livermore and identifies policy direction and actions to implement the continued vitality of the visitor serving region.

PLANNING COMMISSION FEEDBACK ON THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045 On April 21, the Planning Commission reviewed the Draft General Plan and received a presentation from staff. The Commission received public comments related to population growth and preservation of the Urban Growth Boundary. The Commission did not see the need for major revisions to the documents and accepted staff’s minor modifications:

Add new statement to clarify that the Floor Area Ratios (FARs) in the Land Use Element represent maximum allowable intensities. (Planning Commission did not recommend adjusting the the FAR identified in the Draft General Plan).

Add a new policy establishing an open space separation in the Doolan Canyon area, similar to existing policies for South Livermore Valley.

Make minor land use map adjustments to reflect current conditions and support existing businesses, including maintaining a dual designation in the First Street Transition Area and restoring a General Industrial designation for the Las Positas/Contractor’s Place area.

Further, the Commission recommended minor adjustments to mobility policies and suggested clarifying that any study of the East of Greenville area would not be required under any circumstance, that the City retains full discretion, and that neither the policies nor a future study would alter the Urban Growth Boundary (Attachment 3). Similarly, Attachment 3 also includes additional administrative edits staff recommends making to the Draft General Plan.

THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN 2045 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the environmental effects associated with adoption and implementation of the Draft General Plan 2045. The public review period for the Draft EIR began on March 7, 2023, and will end at 5:00 pm on April 24, 2026. (The Draft EIR can be found at the Imagine Livermore 2045 project website). The Draft EIR discloses the environmental impacts expected to result from implementation of the General Plan 2045 including the effects of potential future maximum buildout.

On March 17, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Draft EIR to receive public comments. Public comments received pertained to population assumptions included in the Draft EIR, remarking that the projections anticipate more population growth than will actually occur. The population assumptions included in the Draft EIR are not a projection or a forecast. The General Plan identifies a density range for each developable residential parcel. Whether to build new housing and at what density to build within the permitted range is at the discretion of the property owner. The Draft EIR is required to evaluate maximum potential impacts. The population numbers identified reflect the population growth that could occur with the maximum possible development capacity, as identified in the General Plan to accommodate future state housing requirements. The Draft EIR plans for a maximum of 16,610 net new housing units by the horizon year 2045 which would house approximately 43,820 net new people based on Livermore’s current average household size.

ATTACHMENT 1
661
Livermore’s state housing requirement (the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, or RHNA) for 2023- 2031 is 4,570 housing units, distributed among four income categories that range from Very Low Income to Above Moderate Income. However, the Draft General Plan extends beyond the end of the 6th Housing Element cycle (2023-2031). Assuming continued 8-year housing allocation cycles, and that the General Plan’s expected horizon year is 2045, the updated General Plan designates sufficient residential land to accommodate the future 7th cycle (January 2031 to January 2039) and possibly the 8th cycle (January 2039 to January 2047), depending on the RHNA housing allocation numbers required.

The scale of future RHNA housing allocations is unknown and difficult to predict. Housing requirement numbers are ultimately determined by the State and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) based on statewide demographics. Hypothetically, if the 7th cycle of state Housing requirements is in the same proportion to the existing number of homes as the 6th cycle, it would call for approximately 5,100 new units. Similarly, if the 8th cycle continues that trend, it could be expected to call for an additional 5,900 new units. The combined total would be approximately 11,000 new units over the 7th and 8th cycles (2031 to 2047). This does not include any additional “buffer” for the two future housing requirement cycles. A buffer is necessary to ensure that if the sites listed in the housing opportunity sites inventory are developed without housing or are developed with less than the full amount of housing claimed in the inventory, there is remaining capacity to ensure an ongoing supply of sites for the full allocation during the eight years of the Housing Element cycle. The State recommends a buffer of least 15% to 30%.

If the City does not designate adequate residential sites to meet the future requirements as part of this Draft General Plan 2045, the next Housing Element, which must be adopted in January 2031, and could begin preparation in 2028 or 2029, the City may need to revisit the General Plan land use map and include a process to identify and change the designations on additional sites to accommodate more future housing.

The Draft EIR provides an analysis of future housing and population growth that aligns with future state housing requirements and reflects the residential capacity that would be available from the land use designations on the Draft General Plan land use map. The City of Livermore is obligated to plan for sufficient housing sites and have policies in place to support housing production, but ultimately market conditions and the decisions of private landowners and project applicants will determine the amount of housing that is built over the next 20 years. The population assumptions used for the Draft EIR are not a target or a forecast and do not commit the City to approving or constructing any specific project.

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Assuming that actual population growth would likely be lower than the maximum zoning capacity and determined by market conditions and developer/property owner decisions, staff prepared the Fiscal Impact Analysis based on a feasible development scenario. The purpose of the Fiscal Analysis is to confirm that future growth will be fiscally sustainable, public services can be maintained, and to evaluate the fiscal health of the City through the horizon year 2045. (Attachment 4).

The fiscal analysis uses the City’s budget documents and forecasting methods to assess how the General Plan 2045 may affect General Fund revenues and expenditures. It is based on a realistic development scenario informed by past growth trends, assuming less residential and non-residential development than the full theoretical buildout considered in the Draft EIR. The analysis estimates 7,500 net new housing units by 2045, consistent with trends under the current General Plan. During the 2003 ATTACHMENT 1
662
General Plan cycle, the City planned for about 11,800 housing units but developed approximately 5,400, an overall buildout rate of about 46%. Rather than projecting actual revenues, the analysis evaluates the relative fiscal value of different land use types.

The fiscal analysis evaluates the value associated with different land use types; it does not forecast expected City revenues. Existing deficiencies in City services, depreciation of public facilities, and new infrastructure that may be required by new development are outside of the scope of the fiscal analysis.

Overall, the fiscal analysis found that the assumed buildout of the General Plan 2045 is projected to generate annual General Fund revenues that exceed the costs of providing public services under existing service standards.

NEXT STEPS
Following this Council meeting, staff will revise the Draft General Plan 2045 based on Council direction and prepare the following steps to finalize the Draft General Plan 2045:

July 2026: Planning Commission and City Council will hold public hearings to provide recommendations and consider adoption of the General Plan 2045 and conforming Livermore Development Code amendments and certification of the EIR.

August 2026: Finalize and publish the adopted General Plan 2045 per Council direction.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The Draft General Plan envisions a 20-year buildout to the horizon year 2045. Based on the feasible development scenario analyzed, the General Plan 2045 is anticipated to provide sufficient resources to cover the cost of public services under existing service standards. A detailed Fiscal Impact Analysis is provided in Attachment 4.

COMMUNITY PILLAR:

4. Inclusive and Inviting Spaces and Places
GOAL:

4. Continue to complete the General Plan Update

ATTACHMENTS

1. Community Feedback on Draft General Plan 2045

2. Summary of GPAC Feedback on Draft General Plan

3. Recommended Revisions to Draft General Plan 2045

4. Livermore GPU 2045 Fiscal Impact Analysis
Prepared by: Andy Ross
Principal Planner
ATTACHMENT 1
663
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Kristen Hilton
Acting Administrative Services Director
ATTACHMENT 1
664
JULY 7, 2026 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

DRAFT MINUTES

PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 7, 2026
________________________________________________________________

REGULAR MEETING

1. CALL TO ORDER – The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Tracy Kronzak at 7:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ROLL CALL – Present: Chairperson Tracy Kronzak, Vice Chairperson Charity Steele, Commissioner Jacob Anderson, Commissioner Yolanda Fintschenko, Commissioner Nadine Horner.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Kronzak led the Pledge of Allegiance.

2. OPEN FORUM
Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

Greg Scott addressed the Commission regarding the inclusion of UC Berkley and UC Davis in the Land Grant Colleges; water crisis; and growth predictions in the General Plan update.

There were no more speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER ANDERSON, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FINTSCHENKO, AND CARRIED ON A 4-0 VOTE (WITH

COMMISSIONER HORNER ABSTAINING), THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3.1:

3.1 Approval of the June 16, 2026 Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

4. PROJECT REVIEW - NONE
ATTACHMENT 2
665
PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JULY 7, 2026

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 Hearing to consider a resolution recommending certification of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, approval of the Livermore General Plan 2045, and approval of conforming Zoning Map Amendments establishing a long-term vision, goals, policies, implementation actions and land use designations to guide future decision-making related to growth, development, and resource conservation through 2045.

Recommendation:

Staff recommend the Planning Commission adopt separate resolutions recommending the City Council:
• Certify the General Plan 2045 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Adopt Livermore General Plan 2045, subject to the revisions identified in the Errata Sheet dated July 7, 2026 (GPA 21-003)
• Adopt an ordinance making conforming amendments to the Livermore Zoning Map (ZMA 26-001)
• Retain Existing General Plan Scenic Corridor Policy (under separate cover) until new Scenic Resources policies are considered at a future date (POL 26-002).

Andy Ross, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.

Chairperson Kronzak clarified the difference between a programmatic EIR and mitigation measures established in a project specific EIR; purpose of a neighborhood plan; and contemplated update for the Climate Action Plan.

Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Commissioner Anderson commended staff for their work on the update; highlighted the theme of making housing changes while updating the framework to accommodate those changes, therefore establishing less than significant impacts; and expressed enthusiasm and appreciation.

Commissioner Horner echoed appreciation to staff and the community and noted that plans worked.

Commissioner Fintschenko echoed the gratitude expressed by the other Commissioners.

Vice Chair Steele thanked staff for the thorough review and clear presentation; and the community for its input.

Chairperson Kronzak expressed gratitude to staff and the community; and acknowledged the compassionate, visionary, adaptive and inclusionary outcome.

ATTACHMENT 2
666
JULY 7, 2026 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

ON THE MOTION OF CHAIRPERSON KRONZAK, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 11-26 Recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan 2045 and Zoning Map Amendment and Adopt California Environmental Quality Act Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Resolution 12-26 Recommending that the City Council approve Livermore General Plan 2045.

Resolution 13-26 Recommending that the City Council Adopt an Ordinance Approving Zoning Map Amendment 26-001 to conform with the General Plan 2045.

Resolution 14-26 Recommending approval of Policy Proposal (POL) 26-002 for the Scenic Resources Policy to implement the General Plan 2045 Community Identity Element.

5.2 Hearing to consider an ordinance authorizing Development Agreement 24- 004 to establish a framework and secure vested rights for a future residential project on approximately 50 developable acres within a 122-acre property at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Assessor Parcel Number 902-8-1). The Development Agreement does not propose or authorize a specific development project or physical development, and future implementation actions would be subject to subsequent approvals.

Recommendation:

Staff recommend the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions recommending the City Council:

1. Find that the Development Agreement is within the scope of the certified General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 and that the Agreement itself has no potential to cause a significant environmental effect and is therefore exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). No additional environmental review is required;

2. Adopt an Ordinance authorizing Development Agreement (DA) 24-004.

Shannon Pagan, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.

Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

Paul Bongiovanni, Adventus, congratulated the City on the General Plan; thanked the Commission for its consideration of the Development Agreement; and explained the significant infill property, and proceeds from the sale as part of planned reorganization to the Diocese.

ATTACHMENT 2
667
PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JULY 7, 2026
Chairperson Kronzak confirmed that the project would be covered by a future scenic overlay; and an Neighborhood Plan with Planned Development Zoning to ensure compatibility with the existing neighborhood.

Greg Scott expressed concern with destroying the last remaining scenic corridor and impacting sacred ground; the need to rebuild the Las Collinas overpass; and housing crisis.

William Vidalin, 3680 Las Colinas Road, expressed concern about the impact to their family ranch due to traffic; misaligned overpass; and need for two bridges.

Ian Vidalin, 3680 Las Colinas Road, expressed concern with encroachment and traffic with adjacent developments and the need for County officials to inspect the County parcel and conduct a rigorous traffic study; and provided copies of the property boundaries survey to the Planning Commission clerk.

Robert Downs, East Bay Residents for Responsible Development, representing the building trades organizations, referenced their July 6, 2026, letter; indicated support for the development; and requested inclusion of workforce standards in the Development Agreement.

There were no additional speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Commissioner Anderson confirmed that neighborhood compatibility and technical studies would be considered during site plan and design review; that the Development Agreement was part of an exchange and would provide better connectivity for Springtown, trail completions, contributions to the Community Benefit Fund; and discussed the use of workforce labor.

Commissioner Horner thanked staff and Diocese; discussed the give and take in the agreement; desire for the Diocese to build the high school on an alternate site in Livermore; and belief that the future project would consider the concerns of community.

Commissioner Fintschenko thanked staff and the applicant; and discussed the neighbors’ concerns. Senior Planner Pagan explained that, before any development could occur on the subject property, the parcel would first need to be sold, and a development proposal submitted by a future developer. The proposal would then be reviewed through the entitlement process, including preparation of a Neighborhood Plan with Planned Development zoning, subdivision mapping, and site plan design review. In addition, the necessary technical studies and site-specific environmental analysis would also be completed concurrently with these entitlement steps. Commissioner Fintschenko reviewed the requested actions before the Planning Commission and opportunities for community input.

Vice Chair Steele expressed appreciation for staff’s presentation and acknowledged the public’s concerns.

ATTACHMENT 2
668
JULY 7, 2026 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION
In response to Chairperson Kronzak, Senior Planner Pagan and Principal Planner Ross explained the requirements under CEQA to notify the Tribe and comments received; and the neighborhood notification and outreach process.

In response to Commissioner Fintschenko, Principal Planner Ross explained the use of Community Benefit Funds.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER HORNER, SECONDED BY VICE
CHAIRPERSON STEELE AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 15-26 Recommending the City Council find that the Development Agreement 24-004 for the Adventus Las Colinas Road Property is within the scope of the General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3).

Resolution 16-26 Recommending that the City Council Adopt an Ordinance Approving Development Agreement 24-004 for the Adventus Las Colinas Road Property.

RECESS
Chairperson Kronzak called a recess at 8:25 pm. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 pm with all Commissioners present.

5.3 Hearing to consider a request for the first amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 (“Agreement”) with McGrath RentCorp (DAA 26-002).

The Agreement term would be extended 30 years to 2059, the Agreement boundary would be adjusted, and the Property Owner obligations would be modified to: 1) effectuate a commercial land transfer to a high-revenue commercial user; and 2) secure support for 2045 General Plan and Midtown Area planning objectives.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions recommending the City Council:

1. Find that the first amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 with McGrath RentCorp is exempt under CEQA; and

2. Adopt an Ordinance to approve the first amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 with McGrath RentCorp (DAA 26-002).

Jake Potter, Economic Development Manager, presented the staff report.

Mike Bray, McGrath RentCorp, discussed the existing property and use and requested amendment to allow continued operations.

Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

ATTACHMENT 2
669
PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JULY 7, 2026
There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Commissioner Anderson suggested the proposed amendment is the best outcome considering the circumstances.

Commissioner Horner thanked the owners for coming and acknowledged that housing would be ideal but the business had been in operation for decades.

Commissioner Fintschenko thanked staff and the applicant and indicated the findings could be made.

Vice Chair Steele thanked the City and applicant for coming to the compromise and indicated support for the recommendations.

Chairperson Kronzak expressed appreciation and indicated the findings could be made.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER HORNER, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FINTSCHENKO AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION:

Resolution 17-26 Recommending the City Council find that the First Amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 (DAA 26-002) with Mcgrath RentCorp is Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 And 15061(B)(3).

Resolution 18-26 Recommending that the City Council Adopt an Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 (DAA 26-002) with McGrath RentCorp.

6. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION - NONE

7. MATTERS INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF - NONE

8. ADJOURNMENT – at 8:47 pm to a Regular Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, July 21, 2026 at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ATTACHMENT 2
670













DALTON AV

PATTERSON PASS RD
R

RINCON AV IN

RAYMOND RD AYM

VALLECITOS RD

WISTERIA WY

JUNCTION AV U

OLIVINA AV OL

SUNFLOWER CT

LAS COLINAS RD

COLLEGE AV L

SUPERIOR DR

LORRAINE RD LORRAINE RD

FLYNN RD

NORTHFRONT RD

PIMLICO DR

BMAY SCHOOL RD EL ROMA RD

REUSS RD

BLACK AV B

CARROLL RD

GREENVILLE RD GREENVILLE RD

TESLA RD

HOLMES ST L

SPRINGTOWN BL

FINNIAN WY AIRWAY BL A

RHEEM DR

RAILROAD AV IL D OA ILR V AD

CATALINA DR L

JENSEN ST

ARROYO RD ARR

AMES ST
DIABLO
VIEW S

MURDELL LN

SANTA RITA RD SANT

BROADMOOR ST

ENOS WY

KOLLN ST KOL

HAGEMANN DR HAGE DMANN E

MADEIRA WY

THIRD ST TH D

SECOND ST CON

VANCOUVER WY

NATIONAL DR

HILLCREST AV C H

EAST AV
OLD

FIRST ST

LEXINGTON WY

GALLOWAY
ST

ENCINO DR

HILLCREST AV

MAIN ST
DYER
RD

KAMP DR
FIRST
ST

RUBY HILL DR

PLEASANTON AV LEA

TOURIGA DR

WALL ST

ARLENE WY

FIRST ST

DAPHNE DR D

HOPYARD
RD

MINES RD

BLUEBELL DR BLU

PIMLICO DR M

GREENWOOD RD

CENTRAL AV T C

VINEYARD AV V YA A

KITTY HAWK RD

CHARLOTTE WY

PINE ST

GARAVENTA RANCH RD

DUBLIN BL

HERMAN AV E A

LAS POSITAS BL

CROSS RD
P ST

MAPLE ST

LAUGHLIN RD LA GUHLIN

SCENIC AV

COLLIER CANYON RD

FOURTH ST FO
INMAN
ST

PETERS AV TE

VALLEY AV ALLEY

MURRIETA BL
L ST

NORTH CANYONS PW

EL CHARRO RD

SECOND ST S

CHESTNUT ST ES

OLD BERNAL AV

MOHR AV
S
ST

NEVADA ST

SOUTHFRONT RD TH

ST MARYS ST MA ST ST

BRISA ST RIS

JACK LONDON BL

STANLEY
ST

EL CAMINITO

ALDEN LN A MARINA AV

DEL VALLE PW AL E

DIVISION ST

EL CHARRO RD H RRO EL CHARRO RD EL CHARRO R EL CHARRO RD

CONCANNON BL O

LAS POSITAS RD

OLD SANTA RITA RD
RUBY

HILL BL H

BERNAL AV

DYER RD

FIRST ST
RUBY

HILL DR H

BUSCH RD

GOECKEN RD

TESLA RD

OWENS DR

ROSEWOOD DR

COMSTOCK COMSTOCK O
RD

VINEYARD AV

STONERIDGE DR

DOOLAN RD

PORTOLA AV TOLA AV POR

GATEWAY AV G

SOUTHFRONT RD

STANLEY BL STANLEY BL

ROBERTSON PARK RD

CROAK RD

LIVERMORE AV R IV L

MINES RD M

KOTTINGER DR NG

WETMORE RD WETMORE RD

INDEPENDENCE DR ND

DAGNINO RD

VASCO RD

VASCO RD

ALTAMONT PASS RD

ANDREWS DR

WENTE ST WENTE ST

CONSTITUTION DR T

CASE AV

HARTFORD AV
&RPPHUFLDO
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG8VH
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71

2WKHU
2SHQ6SDFH
26 3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3'HWF

5HVLGHQWLDO
/RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW\%RXQGDULHV
Urban Growth BoundarySphere of InfluenceLivermore City Limits 8SGDWHGRQ-XQHQG
RD
&RPPHUFLDO
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG 8VH
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71

2WKHU
2SHQ6SDFH
26 3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3'HWF

5HVLGHQWLDO
/RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW\%RXQGDULHV
Urban Growth BoundarySphere of InfluenceLivermore City Limits 8SGDWHGRQ-XQHQG
šTASSAJARA RD
AVIANO
WY
O
ST
DIABLO

VIEW DR VIE
   
0LOHV
Area GP2045 Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning1 RC RS CNB
2 LDR3 E RL3 MDR1 E RL4 MDR3 CS T4N5 MDR3 CS T4N6 HDR 1 I-3 MFR7 MDR2 RL RG-168 HLC/MDR2-3/HDR1 OS-A PD9 SC I-3 CS10 WCC OS PD 11 MDR4 PUD 117-91 MFR12 HDR1/GI/MIC/OSP CS PD13 GI PDC-07-005 I-3 DR
VArea GP2045 Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
1 RC RS CNB2 LDR3 E RL3 MDR1 E RL4 MDR3 CS T4N5 MDR3 CS T4N6 HDR 1 I-3 MFR7 MDR2 RL RG-168 HLC/MDR2-3/HDR1 OS-A PD9 SC I-3 CS10 WCC OS PD11 MDR4 PUD 117-91 MFR12 HDR1/GI/MIC/OSP CS PD13 GI PDC-07-005 I-3 Proposed Change Areas
ATTACHMENT 3
671
1 RESOLUTION NO.

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN 2045 AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT

AND ADOPTING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The City of Livermore is considering adoption of the General Plan 2045, a comprehensive update to the City’s 2003–2025 General Plan. General Plan 2045 revises long-range goals, policies, actions, and land use designations to reflect current conditions and community priorities, comply with State and regional requirements, and guide future decision-making through the year 2045 (“Project”). The Project addresses emerging issues such as climate resiliency, transportation technology, and State housing obligations, and includes all State-mandated elements along with elements tailored to Livermore’s needs. The previously adopted 2023–2031 Housing Element remains a standalone document and is not part of the Project. The Project also includes a conforming Zoning Map amendment necessary to maintain consistency between the updated General Plan land use designations and the City’s zoning ordinance.

The City determined that the Project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and that an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) is required. Given the long-term planning horizon and the interconnected nature of future planning and development actions under the Project, the EIR was prepared as a Program EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168.

On March 7, 2023, the City issued a Notice of Preparation pursuant to CEQA to obtain comments on the proposed scope of the EIR for the Project and provided for a 30- day review period through April 6, 2023.

On March 21, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to allow members of the public and other interested parties to comment on environmental issues early in the process. Comments received were considered and incorporated, as appropriate, into the Draft EIR.

On March 3, 2026, the Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2023030225) was published and made available for review by the public and interested parties, agencies, and organizations for a 53-day public comment period ending April 24, 2026.

On March 17, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the adequacy of the Draft EIR at which time oral and written comments were presented to the Planning Commission. Members of the public and other interested parties were invited by formal public notice to testify on the adequacy of the Draft EIR at the public hearing.
672
2 RESOLUTION NO.

On April 24, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. the public comment period on the Draft EIR was closed. The City received thirteen written comment letters and six oral comments at the March 17, 2026, public hearing.

On June 26, 2026, the Final EIR was distributed consisting of copies of all written and oral comments, a list of commenters, all responses to oral and written comments and revisions to the Draft EIR in response to comments. A notice of the Final EIR availability and certification recommendation hearing date was published in a newspaper of general circulation.

On July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider its recommendation to the City Council, and upon review and consideration of the information in the Final EIR and administrative record, adopted Resolution No. 11- 26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending that the City Council certify the Final EIR.

On July 27, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 11-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this Resolution. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby finds that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the intent and requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s local CEQA requirements and has considered the information contained in the Final EIR and the record prior to taking any action on the Project, other related Project actions, or any of the alternatives. The City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and approves and adopts the Findings, Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations Regarding the Environmental Impact Report, attached hereto as Exhibit C.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit D, which is incorporated into the conditions of approval for the Project. 673
3 RESOLUTION NO.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk, if the Project is approved.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore, California. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption by the City Council.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on July 27, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Helena Graves Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 11-26
Exhibit B – Link to Final EIR
Exhibit C – Findings, Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Exhibit D – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 674

EXHIBIT A
675

EXHIBIT A
676

EXHIBIT A
677
Livermore General Plan 2045 Final Environmental Impact Report Available online at: https://imaginelivermore2045.org/documents/ Publish Date: June 26, 2026

EXHIBIT B
678

FINDINGS, FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS, AND STATEMENT OF

OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045
(SCH NO. 2023030225)
On behalf of the City of Livermore (City) and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Res. Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations), the City has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Livermore General Plan 2045 (the proposed Project). The City is the lead agency for the EIR.

Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21002 provides that "public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]" The same statute provides that the procedures required by CEQA "are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects." Section 21002 goes on to provide that "in the event [that] specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof." CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) states that "no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding.” The possible findings are:
1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. 2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.

To support its certification of the EIR and approval of the proposed Project, the City Council of the City of Livermore makes the following findings of fact and statement of overriding considerations (collectively, the Findings). These Findings contain the City Council’s written analysis and conclusion regarding the Project’s environmental effects, mitigation measures, alternatives to the proposed Project, and the overriding considerations which, in the City Council’s view, justify the approval of the proposed Project despite its potential environmental effects. These Findings are based upon the entire record of proceedings for the EIR, as described below.

EXHIBIT C
679
A. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
On March 7, 2023, the City issued a Notice of Preparation pursuant to CEQA to obtain comments on the proposed scope of the EIR for the proposed Project. The City released the Draft EIR on March 3, 2026, for a 53-day public comment period. The City made the Draft EIR available to the Planning Commission; City Council; State Clearinghouse; State, regional, and local agencies and special districts; and interested groups and individuals. On March 17, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Draft EIR. Members of the public and other interested parties were invited by formal public notice to provide comments on the scope and content of the Draft EIR at the public hearing. On April 24, 2026, at 5:00 p.m., the 53-day public comment period on the Draft EIR closed. There were 19 written and oral comments received during the public comment period.

The City released the Final EIR for public review on June 26, 2026. The Final EIR consists of copies of all written or oral comments received on the Draft EIR, a list of commenters, all responses to written and oral comments, and proposed revisions to the Draft EIR. Section 21081.6 of CEQA requires lead agencies to adopt a mitigation monitoring or reporting program (MMRP) for any project for which it has made mitigation findings pursuant to Section 21081. The City has prepared an MMRP for the Project, which has been made available to the public with the FEIR. The EIR that is the subject of these Findings and presented for City Council certification consists of the DEIR, the FEIR, and the MMRP.

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Chapter 2, Project Description, of the Draft EIR, includes a detailed description of the proposed Project. Since publication of the Draft General Plan and Draft EIR, the Planning Commission and City Council have held several public hearings and provided direction to revise certain proposed General Plan policies and actions. These revisions clarify and refine the Draft General Plan, including minor typographical corrections, and do not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts than those analyzed in the Draft EIR, nor do they change the conclusions of the environmental analysis. These minor modifications include the following:

Land Use Element
• Floor Area Ratio: Add new statement to clarify that the Floor Area Ratios (FARs) in the Land Use Element represent maximum allowable intensities. • Doolan Canyon Open Space: Add a new policy establishing an open space separation in the Doolan Canyon area, similar to existing policies for South Livermore Valley. • East of Greenville: Clarification in Policy LU-18.1 that any future study of the East of Greenville area would be at the City’s discretion and is not required by General Plan policy. • Midtown Zoning: Clarification that the zoning districts in effect at the time of adoption shall remain in place until a Midtown Specific Plan is adopted. • Los Positas/Contractor’s Place: Make minor Land Use Map adjustments to reflect current conditions and support existing businesses, including maintaining a dual designation in the First Street Transition Area and restoring a General Industrial designation for the Las Positas/Contractor’s Place area.

EXHIBIT C
680
• First Street Transition Area (Southwestern corner): Make minor Land Use Map adjustment to maintain as a dual Medium Density Residential 3 (MDR3)/Service Commercial (SC) designation.
• Midtown Specific Plan: Make minor Land Use Map adjustment to designate an approximately 37-acres of the Midtown area as Service Commercial (SC) to provide clarity on permitted uses and support continued service‑oriented and industrial operations, while allowing the property owner to pursue new uses consistent with the SC designation. • Vasco Road at Brisa: Update the Neighborhood Commercial designation to General Industrial, consistent with surrounding uses.
• Los Colinas: Refine the Land Use Map to convert the floating MDR‑3 designation to a dual MDR‑2/MDR‑3 floating designation and apply an HDR‑1 designation to the southern portion of the site, allowing greater flexibility in housing types, improved compatibility with surrounding development, and opportunities for deeper affordability.

Minor Revisions to Goals, Policies, and Programs
• Revised Goals and Policies: Minor adjustments to policies and implementation programs in Mobility, Community Identity, Infrastructure and Safety Elements.

The boundary for the city limit encloses the incorporated territory where the City currently has jurisdictional authority. All land outside of the city limit is part of unincorporated Alameda County and is under the County’s jurisdiction. The city limit covers approximately 17,000 acres (about 27 square miles). The urban growth boundary (UGB) is intended to preserve open space and agricultural land outside the UGB. The UGB covers approximately 16,600 acres (about 26 square miles)1 and was established through two initiatives. The South Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative, passed by local voters in March 2000, established the UGB around the southern edge of the city. The North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative, passed by City Council in December 2002, completed the UGB around the northern edge of the city. While both UGBs share goals of preserving agriculture and open space and preventing urbanization, the policies regarding development beyond each UGB and changes to each UGB are different.

The Livermore Sphere of Influence (SOI) is the area outside of the city limit designated by the Alameda Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to indicate land that has the potential to be annexed into the city. The Planning Area encompasses land in Alameda County surrounding the city extending up to four miles beyond the city limit to the north and south. The EIR Study Area includes all land within the city limit, UGB, and SOI. The EIR Study Area does not include the land outside the SOI but within the Planning Area.

The proposed Project updates the current 2003-2025 General Plan goals, policies, and actions, and makes changes to land use designations to reflect current conditions, issues, resources, and community perspectives. For example, changes are needed to address the evolving state of the city and region and to address State housing needs and cover issues such as climate change resiliency and emerging transportation technologies. The proposed update also incorporates regional forecasts for 2045 that extend the planning horizon by approximately 20 years from the current 2025 horizon. The proposed General Plan 2045 includes an introduction, overview of Livermore, nine 1 The UGB is slightly smaller than the City Limit primarily because the rural residential and vineyard area along Vallecitos Road, Vineyard Avenue, and Kalthoff Common is within the City Limit but outside of the South Livermore UGB.

EXHIBIT C
681
separate chapters that identify the goals and policies for each given topic, an implementation plan that identifies the actions that help achieve the goals and policies, a glossary, and appendices. Each chapter of the proposed General Plan 2045 contains background information and a series of goals supported by policies and actions.

The proposed General Plan 2045 Land Use Map shows the land use designations that establish the uses, density ranges, and development intensities allowed on each parcel of land.

Horizon year (2045) buildout assumptions in the EIR Study Area include 49,640 total housing units, 131,750 total residents, and 63,330 total jobs.

As part of the process of updating the General Plan, the City identified targeted procedural revisions to the Livermore Municipal Code (LMC), additional regulatory language to be located in the Livermore Development Code (LDC), and conforming amendments to the Zoning Map to implement General Plan policies and maintain consistency between the planning documents.

The proposed Project would require adoption by Livermore City Council. The Planning Commission will review the proposed Project and make recommendations to the City Council.

While other agencies may be consulted during the General Plan update process, their approval is not required for the adoption of the proposed General Plan 2045. However, subsequent development under the proposed Project may require approval of State, federal, responsible, and trustee agencies that may rely on the programmatic EIR for decisions in their areas of permitting.

Project approvals required include:
• Certification of the General Plan 2045 EIR
• Adoption of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations • Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Adoption of the General Plan 2045
• Adoption of the amendments to the LMC and LDC
C. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS AND DISPOSITION OF

RELATED MITIGATION MEASURES
The Final EIR identifies the following significant and unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the approval of the proposed Project. For reasons set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, Section I, the City has determined that overriding economic, social, and other considerations outweigh the following significant, unavoidable effects of the proposed Project.

1. Agricultural Resources Impact AGR-1: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency to nonagricultural uses.

Implementation of the proposed Project would designate Farmland to nonagricultural land uses. As described in Draft EIR Section 3.2, pages 3.2-11 through 3.2-15, this includes small portions of Farmland of Statewide Importance north of Tesla Road that would be redesignated from Agriculture/Viticulture (AGVT) to Wine Country Commercial (WCC), resulting in the potential

EXHIBIT C
682
conversion of Farmland to nonagricultural uses. Existing regulations, such as the LMC Chapter 3.27 and the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, would reduce impacts associated with the potential conversion of Farmland. Specifically, proposed Policy LU-12.2 requires the City to encourage the establishment and permanent protection of existing and new cultivated agricultural lands through use of conservation easements, land acquisition, and partnerships with organizations.

Proposed Policy LU-12.2 limits urban development outside the South Livermore Valley to generate substantial investment in the long-term viability of South Livermore’s agricultural economy.

Proposed Policy OS-4.1 and Policy OS-4.6 requires the City to preserve undeveloped lands that have agricultural or open space designation, as well as valuable agricultural soils. Proposed Policy OS-4.4 would promote permanent conservation easements. Proposed Policy OS-4.7 and Policy OS-4.8 require the City to identify funding mechanisms to support the preservation of agricultural lands and work with conservation groups and water purveyors to preserve agricultural uses outside the UGB.

Because the significance criterion considered in this analysis is the conversion of any qualifying Farmland (Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance), the only way to fully avoid a significant impact would be to not allow the conversion of such Farmland to a nonagricultural use. However, doing so is not feasible or practical as the City has a responsibility to meet other obligations, including increasing the number and types of jobs available and reducing the need for residents to commute to high-quality jobs, reducing single-occupant vehicle travel to and from Livermore, and permitting residential development. As evaluated in Draft EIR Section 3.2.4, potential mitigation measures, including agricultural land replacement, transfer of development rights, and topsoil relocation, were determined to be infeasible due to lack of suitable replacement land, inability to avoid net loss of Farmland, and substantial secondary environmental impacts..

Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

2. Agricultural Resources Impact AGR-2: Implementation of the proposed Project could conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use and Williamson Act contracts.

Implementation of the proposed Project would rezone land currently zoned for agriculture to nonagricultural uses and designate agricultural land under the Williamson Act contract to nonagricultural land uses. As described in Draft EIR Section 3.2.4, pages 3.2-15 through 3.2-18, this includes small portions of land north of Tesla Road just within the City Limit under a Williamson Act contract with an existing zoning designation of South Livermore Valley Agricultural that would be redesignated from AGVT to WCC, which would result in the development of land currently zoned for agricultural uses under a Williamson Act contract with nonagricultural uses. Existing regulations, such as the Alameda County Agricultural Preserve Program, LMC, LDC, as well as the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce impacts associated with potential conflicts. Specifically, proposed Policies LU-7.1 through LU-7.3 would require regular review of and flexibility in development standards for agricultural zoning and uses to support agricultural production and operational needs. Proposed Policy LU-12.7 requires the City to discourage the nonrenewal or early termination of Williamson Act contracts in the South Livermore Valley. Proposed Policy OS-4.5 requires the City to recruit landowners to enter the agricultural preserve program established under the Williamson Act. Proposed Policy OS-4.9 requires the City to advocate (at the State level) for the expansion of incentives, including Williamson Act contracts, to allow for economically viable agricultural operations. For proposed Policies OS-4.5 and OS-4.9 to effectively

EXHIBIT C
683
reduce impacts related to conflict with the Williamson Act Contract, landowners would need to agree to the Williamson Act contract, which would only be determined on a case-by-case basis.

However, avoiding such conflicts completely is not feasible or practical as the City has a responsibility to meet other obligations, including increasing the number and types of jobs available and reducing the need for residents to commute to high-quality jobs, reducing single-occupant vehicle travel to and from Livermore, and permitting residential development. With respect to Williamson Act contracts, the City considered a mitigation measure that would result in the replacement of Williamson Act land that would place other agricultural land under Williamson Act contract. Even if feasible, the placing of alternative farmland under Williamson Act contract would establish a commitment to retain that alternative farmland for agricultural use. The length of time that the alternative land would remain in agricultural use would depend on the terms of the Williamson Act contract. However, the Williamson Act contract would only reduce the potential that the alternative land would convert to nonagricultural use. The individual and cumulative loss of agricultural land allowed by the proposed Project would still occur. Therefore, this mitigation measure would not reduce the proposed Project’s impacts on agricultural land under Williamson Act contracts to below the level of significance. For these reasons, placing alternative privately held land under permanent restriction through Williamson Act contracts is considered infeasible. Therefore, no feasible mitigation measures have been identified, and impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

3. Agricultural Resources Impact AGR-3: Implementation of the proposed Project could involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use.

As evaluated in Draft EIR Section 3.2.4, pages 3.2-18 through 3.2-21, the proposed General Plan 2045 includes proposed changes in land use designations that could increase development pressure on land currently used for agriculture. Due to their location and proximity to planned urban uses, these changes could result in the conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use over time.

Implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies identified would serve to reduce potential impacts related to other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses by prohibiting future developments adjacent to agricultural areas that would substantially interfere with existing agricultural production and through collaboration with Alameda County and Alameda County LAFCO to protect existing land uses from development inappropriate for rural areas. Specifically, proposed Policies LU-7.4 and LU-7.5 would work to protect agricultural land from conflicts with adjacent existing or proposed nonagricultural land uses that may threaten or interfere with agricultural production. Proposed Policies LU-7.6 and LU-7.7 would require coordination with Alameda County to limit land uses to agricultural and open spaces and protect existing land uses from development inappropriate for rural areas. While compliance with existing LMC and LDC regulations, standards, and guidelines in the South Livermore Valley Specific Plan, and proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce land use conflicts, they would not reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. Avoiding such impacts entirely would require prohibiting development in or near land under agricultural uses, which would not be feasible nor practical, given the City’s obligation to meet State housing law, increase the number and types of jobs available, and reduce the need for residents to commute to high-quality jobs. Therefore, impacts would remain

EXHIBIT C
684
significant and unavoidable. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

4. Agricultural Resources Impact AGR-4: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in a significant cumulative impact with respect to the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), existing zoning for agricultural uses, and Williamson Act properties, and farmland to nonagricultural uses.

Agricultural lands throughout the region face ongoing development pressure due to population growth, housing demand, and the economic incentives associated with converting agricultural lands to urban uses. As such, the region and the State have been experiencing a decline of agricultural acreages. As described in Draft EIR Section 3.2.5, pages 3.2-21 and 3.2-22, the proposed Project would allow conversion of agricultural lands to various types of residential and job-generating development. Agricultural lands throughout the region face ongoing development pressure due to population growth, housing demand, and the economic incentives associated with converting agricultural lands to urban uses. As such, the region and the State have been experiencing a decline of agricultural acreages. With implementation of the proposed Project in combination with agricultural impacts identified throughout surrounding incorporated and unincorporated lands, the region, and the state, the proposed Project could contribute to cumulative impacts to agricultural resources. The proposed Project could allow conversion of Farmland to nonagricultural uses, would redesignate land zoned for agricultural to nonagricultural uses, and would allow land under Williamson Act contract to be converted to nonagricultural uses, and, due to location and proximity to planned urban uses, could result in the conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use over time.

Given the programmatic nature of this analysis, it is unknown at this time to what extent, the rate at which, or if this conversion would occur. However, avoiding such impacts entirely would require prohibiting development in or near land with agricultural uses, which would not be feasible nor practical, given the City’s obligation to meet State housing law, increase the number and types of jobs available, and reduce the need for residents to commute to high-quality jobs. As such, the proposed Project may contribute to the cumulative impacts of overall conversion of these lands in the surrounding incorporated and unincorporated lands, the region, and the state. Although existing regulations such as those required per the LMC and the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce potential impacts, they would not reduce them to less than significant. There are no feasible mitigation measures available to reduce potential impacts. The only way to fully avoid the agricultural impact is to not allow development on Farmland, rezoning of agricultural land to nonagricultural uses, or redesignation of land such that conflicts with Williamson Act contracts occur. However, doing so would be infeasible and inconsistent with the City’s planning goals and objectives. Therefore, this cumulative impact would remain significant and unavoidable. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

EXHIBIT C
685

5. Air Quality Impact AQ-2: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard during construction and operation.

Future development would result in short-term construction-related criteria pollutant emissions that have the potential to have an adverse effect on air quality. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.3.4, page 3.3-59 through 3.3-63, although the exact coverage, location, and duration of future construction projects is unknown at the time of preparation of the program-level Draft EIR, short-term criteria pollutant emissions would occur during demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities associated with individual development projects. Proposed General Plan 2045 Policy OS-6.7 would require future development to implement the Air District’s basic construction measures, which would reduce construction fugitive dust impacts during construction to be less than significant. Proposed Policies OS-6.8 and OS-6.19 would require future development to minimize construction air quality impacts in compliance with the Air District’s regulations. While proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies have the potential to reduce construction emissions for individual projects, future development could still exceed the Bay Area Air District’s (Air District) significance thresholds for construction and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) because site-specific details concerning development schedules, areas of disturbance, distance to sensitive receptors, overlapping equipment use, type of equipment, and overall intensity of development across the EIR Study Area is currently unknown. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project could result in significant and unavoidable construction-related regional air impacts at the program level. Further, as discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.3.4, pages 3.3-63 through 3.3-72, implementation of the proposed Project would generate operational emissions that would exceed the Air District’s regional significance thresholds for reactive organic gases and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). The proposed General Plan 2045 includes goals and policies to reduce these long-term regional criteria air pollutant emissions. Specifically, proposed Policy OS-6.19 identifies requirements for future developments that exceed the Air District screening criteria to prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project operational air quality impacts to the City for review and approval prior to project approval by the City. Where the technical assessment determines the Air District-adopted thresholds are exceeded, the applicants for new development projects would be required to incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. At the programmatic level, it is not possible to identify additional measures that can be assured to reduce the impacts of temporary construction activities on air quality of all future development projects to less-than-significant levels. Therefore, this impact is significant and unavoidable. As such, the City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

6. Air Quality Impact AQ-5: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in cumulative air quality impacts with respect to generation of criteria pollutants and exposure of substantial pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptors.

EXHIBIT C
686
Air quality impacts are regional in nature as no single project generates enough emissions that would cause an air basin to be designated as a nonattainment area. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.3.5, pages 3.3-77 through 3.3-79, criteria air pollutant emissions generated by cumulative development would exceed the Air District’s project-level significance thresholds during construction and operation and would contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SFBAAB.

Therefore, this impact is cumulatively considerable. Due to the programmatic nature of cumulative projects and uncertainty of site-specific details concerning development schedules, areas of disturbance, distance to sensitive receptors, overlapping equipment use, type of equipment, and overall intensity of development, no feasible mitigation measures are available that would ensure adequate reduction of emissions on a future project-level basis. Therefore, air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed Project would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to air quality impacts and remain significant and unavoidable at the program level. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact GHG-1: Implementation of the proposed Project could generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.

As evaluated in Draft EIR Section 3.8.4, pages 3.8-24 through 3.8-26, it is anticipated that year 2045 conditions would result in an overall decrease in emissions compared to the existing baseline. However, the proposed Project’s emissions would not achieve the 2022 CAP’s long-term per-capita efficiency target of zero MTCO2e per person per year and would not be considered consistent with the long-term year goals under AB 1279. Implementation of General Plan 2045 Policy OS-7.1 would require the City to monitor the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and ensure that the CAP aligns with the GHG reduction targets of AB 1279 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG emission reduction standards. It would also require the City to track and monitor GHG emissions. In addition, CAP measures and General Plan policies that increase energy efficiency, reduce water use, and offset electricity use through solar panels would reduce GHG emissions to the extent feasible. However, given the projected growth in population and employment within the EIR Study Area, the reductions needed from existing land uses, and the magnitude of reductions required to achieve the State’s long-term GHG targets, it cannot be determined with certainty that goals and policies of General Plan 2045 related to GHG reduction and related CAP measures would achieve the substantial reductions necessary to meet Assembly Bill (AB) 1279 targets. Achieving these statewide targets relies, in part, on future technological advancements and statewide actions that are outside the City’s authority and cannot be imposed as feasible mitigation at the General Plan program level. No additional feasible mitigation measures are available that would reduce emissions to a level consistent with the long-term State targets until the 2022 CAP is updated pursuant to Policy OS-7.1. Therefore, because no feasible mitigation is available and the proposed Project would not meet State GHG reduction targets, GHG emissions under the proposed Project would remain significant and unavoidable. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

EXHIBIT C
687

8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact GHG-2: Implementation of the proposed Project could conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.8.4, pages 3.8-36 through 3.8-43, the proposed Project would be consistent with the applicable 2022 CAP Strategies, the 2020 Scoping Plan, and Plan Bay Area 2050+. However, implementation of the proposed Project would not achieve the 2022 CAP long-term per-capita efficiency target of zero MTCO2e per person per year and, therefore, conflicts with the 2022 CAP. Implementation of CAP measures would increase energy efficiency, reduce water use, and offset electricity use through solar panels and would reduce GHG emissions to the extent feasible. However, given the growth in population and employment within the EIR Study Area, the reductions needed from existing land uses, the magnitude of emissions reductions needed to achieve the long-term efficiency threshold, and federal legal constraints on the implementation and effectiveness of State actions for emission reduction, it is uncertain whether consistency with the 2022 CAP and implementation of goals and policies of General Plan 2045 would achieve the substantial reductions needed to achieve the long-term efficiency threshold. Because the proposed Project would conflict with the underlying goal of the 2022 CAP, this impact is significant and unavoidable. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

9. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact GHG-3: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in a significant cumulative impact with respect to generation of GHG emissions that may have a significant impact on the environment and conflict with an applicable plan adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.8.5, because GHG emissions are cumulative in nature and not confined to a particular air basin, impacts described previously under Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts GHG-1 and GHG-2 are not project-specific impacts, but the proposed Project’s contribution to this cumulative impact. As described previously, various proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would help minimize GHG emissions. However, as described under Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact GHG-1 on Draft EIR pages 3.8-24 through 3.8-26, the proposed Project would not achieve the long-term year 2045 reduction goal and State’s carbon neutrality goal set by AB 1279. As described under Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact GHG-2 on Draft EIR pages

3.8-36 through 3.8-43, the proposed Project aligns with plans and regulations aimed at reducing their cumulative environmental impacts, such as the City’s 2022 CAP strategies, the California Air Resources Board’s Scoping Plan, or Plan Bay Area 2050+. However, the proposed Project would not achieve the City’s 2022 underlying per-capita goal for year 2045. Proposed General Plan 2045 Policy OS-7.1 would require the City to monitor the CAP to align GHG emissions targets in the city with the state’s carbon neutrality goal set by AB 1279. This policy would also ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring GHG emissions. However, given the projected growth in population and employment, the reductions needed from existing land uses, and the magnitude of reductions required to achieve the State’s long-term GHG targets, it is uncertain whether consistency with the 2022 CAP and implementation of goals and policies of General Plan 2045 would achieve the substantial reductions necessary to meet AB 1279 targets. Achieving these statewide targets relies, in part, on future technological advancements and statewide actions that are outside the City’s authority

EXHIBIT C
688
and cannot be imposed as feasible mitigation at the General Plan program level. No additional feasible mitigation measures are available that would reduce emissions to a level consistent with the long-term State targets until the 2022 CAP is updated. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would contribute to cumulative GHG impacts, and the proposed Project would have a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. As such, the City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

10. Mineral Resources Impact MIN-1: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in the loss of availability of known mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.12.4, pages 3.12-5 and 3.12-6, most of the central and western portions of the EIR Study Area, including existing developed neighborhoods and commercial areas, have been classified as Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ)-2, where the land is underlain by demonstrated mineral resources considered important to the region or the State. The proposed General Plan 2045 land use map would designate lands classified as MRZ-2 as a mix of compatible and incompatible land uses. Future development would be required to comply with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA), which aims to protect significant mineral resources from the intrusion of incompatible land uses. Additionally, development on lands classified as MRZ2 and MRZ-3 would be subject to the provisions of SMARA Section 2762(e), which requires an evaluation of the site to ascertain the significance of the mineral deposit in the area. The results of the evaluation would be submitted to the State Geologist and the California State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) for review. Further, the proposed General Plan 2045 contains a policy that requires the City to preserve mineral resources. Specifically, proposed Policy OS-9.1 requires the City to consider potentially available mineral resources on the property or in the vicinity when considering land use proposals. In addition, the provisions of the SMARA would reduce impacts to aggregate mineral resources to the extent possible by requiring site-specific evaluations to discover the presence of mineral resources. However, the only way to fully avoid the impact to mineral resources from implementation of the proposed Project is to not allow incompatible land uses in areas classified as MRZ-2, thereby eliminating the impact. The City has a responsibility to meet other obligations, including increasing the number and types of jobs available and reducing the need for residents to commute to high-quality jobs. These measures are critical to reducing singleoccupant vehicle travel and meeting State targets for GHG reduction. Therefore, the City needs to continue to allow development within areas classified as MRZ-2 with incompatible uses, as appropriate, to promote future economic development and corresponding residential development, as required by State housing law, within its adopted UGB. Accordingly, there are no feasible mitigation measures to reduce impacts, and impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. As such, the City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

11. Mineral Resources Impact MIN-3: Implementation of the proposed Project could result in a significant cumulative impact with respect to the loss of availability of known mineral resources that are of value to the region and the residents of the State.

EXHIBIT C
689
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.12.5, pages 3.12-7 through 3.12-9, existing mineral extraction in Eastern Alameda County is mainly in unincorporated Alameda County to the west of the EIR Study Area and outside of the Pleasanton City Limit. This land is designated as MRZ-2 and regionally significant construction aggregate resources areas. Future development in the region would be subject to the applicable jurisdiction’s mineral resources regulations, including applicable municipal codes, as well as SMARA Section 2762(e), which requires an evaluation of the site to ascertain the significance of the mineral deposit in the area to be submitted to the SMGB for review.

However, there are undeveloped areas classified as MRZ-2 that may develop over the horizon of the proposed Project with incompatible uses. The only way to fully avoid this impact is to not allow incompatible land uses in areas classified as MRZ-2, thereby eliminating the impact. The City has a responsibility to meet other obligations, including increasing the number and types of jobs available in Livermore and reducing the need for residents to commute to high-quality jobs. These measures are critical to reduce single-occupant vehicle travel and meeting State targets for GHG reduction.

Therefore, the City needs to continue to allow development within areas classified as MRZ-2 with incompatible uses, as appropriate, to promote future economic development and corresponding residential development, as required by State housing law, within its adopted UGB. Although the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce and partially offset cumulative impacts, the proposed Project would contribute to the loss of significant mineral resources impact in the region. Therefore, this cumulative impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Therefore, the City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

12. Noise Impact NOI-1: Implementation of the proposed Project could generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.

As evaluated in Draft EIR Section 3.13.4, pages 3.13-36 through 3.13-40, the primary source of temporary noise within the EIR Study Area would be demolition and construction activities associated with development projects All future projects would be required to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance (LMC Chapter 9.36). Additionally, proposed Policy N-4.4 requires the minimization of excessive noise and vibration levels from construction-related activity to meet acceptable levels, as established by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) or the City. Adherence to the City’s Noise Ordinance and compliance with the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure that operational noise sources, including traffic, stationary, and railroad noise, would not exceed established noise standards. Implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible.

Implementation of one or a combination of construction best management practices (BMPs) would provide between 3 A-weighted decibels (dBA) and 10 dBA of noise reduction. Because the proposed General Plan 2045 is a long-term planning document with no specific projects identified, specific, project-level information is inherently not available, and it is not possible to quantify the estimated construction noise levels at specific sensitive receptors due to a given project. In most cases, construction of individual developments consistent with the proposed Project would temporarily increase the environment’s ambient noise in the vicinity of each individual project, potentially affecting existing and future nearby sensitive uses, such as residences, parks, and schools. However,

EXHIBIT C
690
due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, implementation of the proposed Project could result in a temporary substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Since the proposed Project is a long-term planning document with no specific projects identified, specific project-level information is inherently not available, and it is not possible to quantify the estimated construction noise levels at specific sensitive receptors related to an individual development. At the programmatic level, it is not possible to identify additional measures that can be assured to reduce the impacts of temporary construction noise of all future development projects to less-than-significant levels. Therefore, impacts related to temporary construction noise would remain significant and unavoidable. The City makes the finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

13. Noise Impact NOI-4: Implementation of the proposed Project could generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, resulting in a significant cumulative impact.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.13-5, pages 3.13-54 through 3.13-57, noise and vibration impacts tend to be localized; therefore, noise impacts for traffic and stationary noise sources are limited to approximately 500 feet from the source and 50 feet from the source for typical heavy-duty construction equipment and 100 feet from pile-driving activities for groundborne vibration. While compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance and the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce construction noise impacts, construction activities associated with cumulative buildout may occur simultaneously and near noise-sensitive receptors, and, depending on the project type, distance to nearest noise-sensitive receptor, equipment list, time of day, phasing, and overall construction durations, noise disturbances may occur for prolonged periods of time or during the more sensitive nighttime hours. Implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, specifically proposed Policy N-4.4, would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible, and implementation of one or a combination of construction BMPs would provide between 3 dBA and 10 dBA of noise reduction. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects that could occur simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction of cumulative projects could result in a temporary substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Since the proposed Project is a long-term planning document with no specific projects identified, specific project-level information is inherently not available, and it is not possible to quantify the estimated construction noise levels at specific sensitive receptors. At the programmatic level, it is not possible to identify additional measures that can be assured to reduce the impacts of temporary construction noise of cumulative projects to less-than-significant levels. Therefore, impacts related to temporary construction noise would remain significant and unavoidable and could result in a cumulative increase in noise. The City makes the findings that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR infeasible (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][3]).

EXHIBIT C
691
D. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR THAT ARE REDUCED TO A LEVEL OF “LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT” BY THE MITIGATION MEASURES

INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT
The Final EIR identifies the following significant impacts associated with the proposed Project that are reduced to a less-than-significant level by mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR. It is hereby determined that the following environmental impacts will be mitigated to a lessthan-significant level or avoided by incorporation of the mitigation measures into the proposed Project:

1. Biological Resources Impact BIO-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, with incorporation of the following mitigation measures: MM BIO-4.

As discussed in Section 3.4.4, pages 3.4.41 through 3.4-43, the proposed Project promotes infill development and encourages higher density in already-developed areas, which greatly minimizes potential impacts to wildlife movement corridors; however, future development (especially on undeveloped land) could occur on the peripheral portions of the EIR Study Area that provide function as corridors. Future development would be required to comply with existing federal, State, and local regulations, including requirements to implement the strategies of the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) and the BMPs of the City’s Stream Maintenance Program (SMP) to conserve wildlife movement corridors. Further, proposed Policy OS-2.5 would require the City to work with project applicants to cluster new development to preserve space for habitat and wildlife connectivity. Proposed Policy OS-2.10 would require coordination with other agencies to plan for the safe travel of wildlife across Interstate 580 and secure easements that protect wildlife corridors. Proposed Policy OS-2.11 would require the maintenance of aquatic movement corridors. However, future development could include the development of buildings, reflective glass, and artificial lighting. These structures and lighting could disrupt movement or foraging behavior of native birds, including migratory and special-status species, and potentially increase collision-related mortality. MM BIO-4 requires bird-safe design measures by project applicants to reduce potential impacts on migratory and resident birds. These measures would minimize collision-related mortality and maintain functional wildlife movement through riparian, wetland, and open-space habitats.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, with incorporation of MM BIO-4. The City makes the finding, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that MM BIO-4 has been required, and incorporated into, the proposed Project, and that this measure will be implemented and enforced through the MMRP, thereby avoiding or substantially lessening the significant environmental effect identified in the Final EIR.

2. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5, with implementation of MM CUL-2.

EXHIBIT C
692
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.5.4, pages 3.5-34 through 3.5-36, the proposed General Plan 2045 would not directly result in new development; however, it is a regulatory document that includes proposed changes in land use designation that would allow redevelopment and increased density on certain parcels within the EIR Study Area. While the proposed Project promotes infill development and encourages higher density in already-developed areas, which greatly minimizes potential impact on existing archaeological resources, it is still possible to encounter previously unknown resources, especially on undeveloped sites. Future development would be subject to PRC Section 5097.5(a), which specifies that a person shall not knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure, or deface, any archaeological sites without the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over the lands. In addition, proposed General Plan 2045 policies are designed to protect archeological resources; specifically. proposed Policy CI-5.1 would require investigations by a qualified professional where development is proposed in areas of cultural and paleontological sensitivity. Proposed Policy CI-5.2 requires immediate suspension of work in the area if cultural or paleontological resources are discovered during construction and, if the resource is significant, prioritize preservation in place or implement appropriate mitigation. While future development would be required to comply with federal and State laws and regulations, as well as the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, compliance with such regulations alone cannot be assumed to fully avoid or eliminate impacts to unknown archaeological resources associated with site-specific development. MM CUL-2 would ensure that archaeological resources identified during construction would be evaluated and protected or appropriately treated. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5, with implementation of MM CUL-2. The City makes the finding, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that MM CUL-2 has been required, and incorporated into, the proposed Project, and that this measure will be implemented and enforced through the MMRP, thereby avoiding or substantially lessening the significant environmental effect identified in the Final EIR.

3. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5, with implementation of MM CUL-4.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.5.4, pages 3.5-38 through 3.5-39, future development, especially on undeveloped sites, could affect known or previously unidentified tribal cultural resources (TCRs). In addition, the potential for additional undiscovered eligible TCRs to be present within the future sites exists but varies by location. Proposed Policy CI-5.4 requires the protection of TCRs and consultation with tribal representatives as required by State law. Proposed Policy CI-6.7 would require historical resource evaluations and impact analysis prepared by a qualified professional for projects that could affect a known or potential historic resource and Policy CI-5.1 would require investigations by a qualified professional where development is proposed in areas of cultural and paleontological sensitivity. Proposed Policy CI-5.2 requires immediate suspension of work in the area if cultural or paleontological resources are discovered during construction and, if the resource is significant, prioritize preservation in place or implementation of appropriate mitigation. While future development would be required to comply with existing federal, State, and local laws and regulations, as well as implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, compliance with such regulations alone cannot be assumed to fully avoid or eliminate impacts to TCRs associated with site-specific development. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 would ensure that TCRs are identified, evaluated, and protected or appropriately treated during

EXHIBIT C
693
construction. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a TCR listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources, as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k), with incorporation of MM CUL-4. The City makes the finding, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that MM CUL-4 has been required, and incorporated into, the proposed Project, and that this measure will be implemented and enforced through the MMRP, thereby avoiding or substantially lessening the significant environmental effect identified in the Final EIR.

4. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of PRC Section 5024.1, with incorporation of MM CUL-4.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.5.4, pages 3.5-40, the City, in its capacity as lead agency, has not identified or determined any known TCRs to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of PRC Section 5024.1. Although there is the possibility that previously undiscovered TCRs could be encountered by subsurface earthwork activities associated with construction of future development projects. While future development would be required to comply with existing federal, State, and local laws and regulations, as well as the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, compliance with such regulations alone cannot be assumed to fully avoid or eliminate impacts to unknown TCRs associated with site-specific development. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-4, which outlines the procedures for discovery of previously unknown TCRs, would ensure that impacts to resources significant under PRC Section 5024.1(c) are adequately mitigated. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of PRC Section 5024.1, with incorporation of MM CUL-4. The City makes the finding, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that MM CUL-4 has been required, and incorporated into, the proposed Project, and that this measure will be implemented and enforced through the MMRP, thereby avoiding or substantially lessening the significant environmental effect identified in the Final EIR.

E. LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR
Although findings pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) are not required for impacts that would not result in significant environmental effect, the City finds that the proposed Project would result in less-than-significant impacts with respect to the following environmental resource categories, as described below:

1. Aesthetic Resources Impact AES-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.1.4, pages 3.1-11 through 3.1-13, the EIR Study Area contains many scenic views featuring natural landscape, rolling hills, and ridgelines, especially as seen from the I-580 scenic corridor. For the purposes of this analysis, these scenic views are considered scenic vistas under this threshold. The proposed Project promotes infill development and

EXHIBIT C
694
encourages higher density in already-developed areas, where it would be expected to have less of an impact on existing scenic vistas and/or corridors. Proposed Policies CI-10.1 through CI-10.4 would preserve views of scenic vistas and promote views from key public vantage points by implementing design standards that would ensure future development would be designed such that scenic vistas are maintained. Proposed Policy CI-12.1 would ensure that the visual qualities along the I-580 scenic corridor are protected. Proposed Policies CI-9.1 through CI-9.6 would ensure that natural features that make up scenic views are preserved through the protection of hills, ridgelines, and waterbodies, the requirement of a grading permit for the alteration of natural or artificial contours as well as the identification and mapping of natural amenities throughout the City. The proposed Project would also include updates to the LDC to introduce the Scenic Resources Overlay District. The proposed Scenic Resources Overlay District would include specific development and design standards to protect scenic views and establish inviting gateways into Livermore. Therefore, as confirmed through design review (required by the LDC and proposed General Plan 2045 Policy CI-13.1), project consistency with the Design Standards and Guidelines, Livermore Mixed-Use and Multifamily Objective Design Standards (MODS), any applicable Specific Plan, as well as the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies and the proposed Scenic Resources Overlay District, would ensure that future development would not cause a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, including those of hillsides, ridgelines, and water bodies. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista.

2. Aesthetic Resources Impact AES-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially degrade the view from a State scenic highway, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.1.4, pages 3.1-14 and 3.1-15, there is not an “officially designated” State scenic highway in the EIR Study Area; however, Caltrans has assigned the entire section of I-580 that spans the EIR Study Area as being “eligible” to be designated as a State scenic highway. The proposed General Plan 2045 would not directly result in new development; however, it is a regulatory document that includes proposed changes in land use designation that would allow for redevelopment and increased density on certain parcels within the EIR Study Area. As the City receives development applications for future development, those applications would be reviewed by the City through the Site Plan and Design Review process for compliance with the Design Standards and Guidelines, MODS, any applicable Specific Plan, as well as the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies and the proposed Scenic Resources Overlay District; compliance with these standards would ensure development would not substantially damage scenic resources within view of a scenic highway. Specifically, proposed Policy CI-12.1 would ensure that the visual qualities along the I-580 scenic corridor are protected by limiting highway commercial development to areas immediately adjacent to freeway interchanges. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially degrade the view from a State scenic highway, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings.

3. Aesthetic Resources Impact AES-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality in an urbanized area.

EXHIBIT C
695
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.1.4, pages 3.1-15 through 3.1-19, all future development would be required to undergo a Site Plan and Design Review, as required by LDC Chapter 9.07, to ensure consistency with General Plan policies, any applicable Specific Plan, Design Standards and Guidelines, and LDC standards. Future mixed-use and multifamily development would be subject to the design standards outlined in the MODS, which ensures that new development is designed to be compatible with adjacent uses as well as existing and future development. Furthermore, future development would also be subject to the regulations of the various planning documents, including the Downtown Specific Plan, Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan, El Charro Specific Plan, and South Livermore Valley Specific Plan. Further, the proposed Policy CI-13.1 would require all new development and redevelopment to be subject to design review and would require the City to regularly update the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines. Proposed Policy CI-13.3 would require new development and redevelopment to consider the context and character of surrounding land uses. Proposed Actions CI-A-14.1 and CI-A-14.2 would further support these policies by developing objective design standards and updating the LDC to ensure visually pleasing and compatible development that reflects current best practices in planning and design. Additionally, the proposed Project would involve updates to the LDC to introduce the Scenic Resources Overlay District. Future development would be required to undergo the Site Plan and Design Review process to ensure adherence to existing regulations, along with the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as well as the proposed Scenic Resources Overlay District. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality in an urbanized area.

4. Aesthetic Resources Impact AES-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people on- or off-site to substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.1.4, pages 3.1-19 and 3.1-20, compliance with existing lighting standards to reduce light spill and glare and implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, to be confirmed through Site Plan and Design Review, would ensure future development does not generate excessive light levels or glare. Proposed Policy CI-11.2 would require developments to minimize obtrusive glare and wasted energy from excessive nighttime lighting and preserve views of the nighttime sky. Proposed Action CI-A-11.1 would further support this policy by requiring the City to update the LDC and Standard Details to include design standards that regulate lighting quantity, intensity, and design, minimizing glare, light trespass, and sky glow.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people on- or off-site to substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

5. Aesthetic Resources Impact AES-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to aesthetic resources.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.1.5, pages 3.1-20 and 3.1-22, future development would be subject to the design review processes of the individual jurisdiction, and the applicable land use plans containing policies and implementing programs to preserve visual character, land use compatibility, and views and minimize light and glare in those jurisdictions. As such, the proposed Project, in conjunction with cumulative projects, would result in a less than significant cumulative impact with respect to aesthetics.

EXHIBIT C
696

6. Air Quality Impact AQ-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.3.4, pages 3.3-39 through 3.3-59, the proposed Project would not exceed the Plan Bay Area 2050+ regional growth projections, would be consistent with the current AQMP (2017 Clean Air Plan) control measures, and would decrease VMT per service population with implementation of applicable goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan 2045. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

7. Air Quality Impact AQ-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.3.4, pages 3.3-72 through 3.3-76, with incorporation of proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, including proposed Policies OS-6.2 through OS-6.5, construction and long-term operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase in criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants in the EIR Study Area. Additionally, permitted sources of emissions would be regulated by the Air District to ensure that, on a project-byproject basis, emissions achieve their permit thresholds. Proposed Policies OS-6.2, OS-6.4, and OS6.5 would require project applicants to prepare a health risk assessment and identify appropriate mitigation (e.g., buffer distances, filters) to reduce health risk from major sources of toxic air pollution. These proposed General Plan 2045 policies would ensure future development would identify project-specific mitigation measures to reduce potential health risks and protect sensitive receptors from poor air quality from nonpermitted sources associated with development of industrial and commercial land uses. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

8. Air Quality Impact AQ-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.3.4, pages 3.3-76 and 3.3-77, compliance with proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as well applicable Air District rules and regulations, would prevent odor emissions from adversely affecting a substantial number of people in the EIR Study Area. Specifically, proposed Policy OS-6.6 would require adequate buffer distances or incorporation of filters or other equipment/solutions into the new odor-generating development to reduce nearby receptors’ exposure to acceptable levels. Furthermore, nuisance odors are regulated under Air District Regulation 7, Odorous Substances, which requires abatement of any nuisance generating an odor complaint, and Air District Regulation 1, Rule 1-301, Public Nuisance. Compliance with these Air District regulations would ensure that odor impacts associated with the proposed Project are minimized. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

9. Biological Resources Impact BIO-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).

EXHIBIT C
697
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.4.4, pages 3.4-34 through 3.4-37, while the potential for adverse impacts on special-status species is relatively low, there remains a potential for loss or disruption due to conversion of areas of natural habitat, removal of trees and other vegetation, increases in light and noise, and other modifications and disturbance, especially where future development occurs on undeveloped land. Grading and other construction disturbance to existing natural habitat could include the direct loss of special-status plants and animal species or further isolate them from other occurrences where urbanization creates barriers between the remaining areas of natural habitat. This includes possible loss or disturbance to bird nests in active use. Future development would be subject to the local, regional, State, and federal regulations outlined in Draft EIR Section 3.4.1, including the requirements of USFWS and CDFW, the strategies of the EACCS, and the BMPs of the SMP to protect specifical-status species. Additionally, the General Plan 2045 contains goals and policies designed to address potential impacts to special-status species.

Specifically, proposed Policies OS-2.5 and OS-2.6 would serve to protect sensitive species and their habitats through project design by clustering development and avoiding areas that support wildlife and plan habitats that contribute to ecological connectivity. Proposed Policies OS-1.6 and OS-1.10 require the City to work with local stakeholders and agencies to preserve sensitive habitats. Proposed Policies OS-2.2 and OS-2.3 would require the City to implement the EACCS and future, proposed Livermore Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), which include further strategies and BMPs to minimize impacts to sensitive species and their habitats. A key strategy of the EACCS is the conservation of core habitat areas that support sensitive and special-status species, and the EACCS provides technical guidance for focal sensitive species, including recommendations for survey approaches, buffers, and mitigation to reduce disturbance. Implementation of these recommendations would be required for applicable projects per OS-2.2. Proposed Actions OS-A-1.3, OS-A-1.4, and OS-A-2.1 would further support these policies by developing a program to manage City-owned open space lands using sustainable practices and to identify, prioritize, and implement conservation easements on these lands to support habitat values and collaborating with other agencies to preserve natural and near-natural landscape communities. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS.

10. Biological Resources Impact BIO-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.4.4, pages 3.4-37 through 3.4-39, the proposed Project promotes infill development and encourages higher density in already-developed areas, which greatly minimizes potential impacts to riparian habitats and sensitive communities; however, future development (especially on undeveloped land) could occur within riparian habitat or other sensitive communities. Future development would be subject to the local, regional, State, and federal regulations, including requirements of USFWS, CDFW, the strategies of the EACCS, and the BMPs of the SMP to protect sensitive natural communities. Future development would also undergo review through the City’s entitlement process and, as applicable, CEQA to ensure consistency with federal, State, and local regulations intended to protect sensitive biological resources, including riparian habitats and sensitive natural communities. Further, implementation of proposed Policy OS-2.9 would ensure development adjacent to riparian habitats supports the protection, enhancement, and restoration of riparian vegetation and Policy OS-2.7 would require habitat mitigation as a tool to

EXHIBIT C
698
protect sensitive natural habitats. Proposed Policies OS-1.6 and OS-1.10 require the City to work with local stakeholders and agencies to preserve sensitive habitats. A key strategy of the EACCS is the conservation of core habitat areas that support sensitive and special-status species, and the EACCS provides technical guidance for focal sensitive species, including recommendations for survey approaches, buffers, and mitigation to reduce disturbance. Implementation of these recommendations would be required for applicable projects per proposed Policy OS-2.2. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS.

11. Biological Resources Impact BIO-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.4.4, pages 3.4-39 and 3.4-40, future development would comply with adopted State, federal, and local regulations for the protection of wetlands and waters of the United States and/or State. In addition, future projects would comply with requirements of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies related to the protection of these biological resources.

Specifically, proposed Policy OS-2.6 and Policy OS-3.2 would require the City to protect wetlands by avoiding development in areas that support wildlife and plant habitats and maintaining and enhancing Livermore’s creeks, arroyos, and wetlands. Proposed Policy 2.14 would require the City to work with natural resource agencies and organizations to develop programs to fund preservation of sensitive biological resources, including arroyos, wetlands, riparian areas, and grasslands.

Implementation of these regulations would reduce impacts on State or federally protected wetlands and waters by emphasizing avoidance, minimization, and mitigation of impacts, including finding that there is “no net loss” of wetlands or other adverse effects on wetlands through hydromodification, filling, diversion, or change in water quality before approving development permits. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.

12. Biological Resources Impact BIO-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.4.4, page 3.4-43, future development would be subject to the LMC requirements pertaining to tree preservation and the BMPs of the SMP. The location and nature of development considered under the proposed Project would continue to be guided by the General Plan and Development Code. Future development would continue to be reviewed through the City’s entitlement process and, as applicable, CEQA to ensure consistency with local regulations intended to protect biological resources. Future development would be required to comply with the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies related to biological resources. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.

EXHIBIT C
699

13. Biological Resources Impact BIO-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Community Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.4.4, page 3.4-44, there are currently no adopted local, regional, or State HCPs that cover the EIR Study Area. Proposed Policy OS-2.3 requires the adoption and implementation of the Livermore HCP. Adoption is anticipated in 2028. The Livermore HCP would serve to protect covered species and their habitats while streamlining environmental permitting for covered activities, including the City’s Capital Improvement Projects, ongoing operations and maintenance, the SMP, and implementation of conservation strategies. When the HCP is adopted, covered activities would be required to comply with these measures, adhere to defined mitigation ratios, and account for authorized take of species resulting from covered project activities. Therefore. implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Community Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan.

14. Biological Resources Impact BIO-7: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to biological resources.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.4.5, page 3.4-45, future development, as well as other future projects in the eastern Alameda County region, would be required to comply with federal, State, and local laws and policies and all applicable permitting requirements of the regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential impacts on sensitive biological resources.

Environmental review of specific development proposals, as applicable, would serve to ensure that important biological resources are identified, avoided, or adequately mitigated for where potential impacts exist. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to biological resources.

15. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.5.4, pages 3.5-31 through 3.5-34, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies in conjunction with the City’s existing design standards and guidelines, regulations, and procedures outlined in the LMC and LDC, and compliance with relevant State and federal laws would ensure that approval of future development consistent with proposed Project is contingent on avoiding or minimizing impacts to historical resources. Specifically, proposed Policy CI-6.3 and CI-6.4 would require the City to maintain and update the Historic Resources Inventory and designate and protect historic resources and potential historic resources in accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Proposed Policy CI-6.7 would require historical resource evaluations and impact analysis prepared by a qualified professional for projects that could affect a known or potential historic resource. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5

16. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries.

EXHIBIT C
700
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.5.4, pages 3.5-37 and 3.5-38, compliance with the procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains that are mandated by CEQA Section 15064.5(e), PRC Section 5097.98, and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 are standard protocol for qualified professionals and would be adhered to for the proper treatment of discovered human remains. Therefore, compliance with mandatory regulatory procedures and the proposed General Plan 2045 goal and policies would minimize impacts related to the potential discovery or disturbance of any human remains accidentally unearthed during construction activities associated with future development. Specifically, proposed General Plan Policy CI-16.2 requires the immediate suspension of work in the area where resources are discovered during construction and evaluation of the resource by a qualified professional. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries.

17. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to cultural and tribal cultural resources.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.5.5, pages 3.5-41 and 3.5-42, future projects would be required to be consistent with the goals and policies of the proposed General Plan 2045 and adopted regulations pertaining to archaeological resources, human remains, and TCRs in Livermore, as described under impact discussions (b) through (e) in the Draft EIR. While development associated with the proposed Project may have the potential to result in adverse change to archaeological resources, human remains, and TCRs, the proposed General Plan 2045 includes extensive goals and policies designed to protect such resources. Additionally, Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would require a cultural resources records search and sensitivity assessment. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 and CUL-5 would require procedures for discovery of previously unknown resources. Furthermore, any potentially significant cumulative impacts are related to site-specific impacts to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources in the eastern Alameda County region and would be mitigated, as necessary, on a project-by project basis. In addition, cumulative projects would be required to comply with applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations, including, among others, the provisions of SB 18 and AB 52, Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and Sections 5024.1 and 5097 of the PRC. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to cultural and tribal cultural resources.

18. Energy Impact ENG-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.6.4, pages 3.6.18 through 3.6-28, with implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, in conjunction with and complementary to regulatory requirements, energy demand associated with growth under the proposed Project is expected to result in an overall decrease in per-capita energy consumption, decreased reliance on fossil fuels, and increased reliance on renewable energy, consistent with the CEQA Guidelines Appendix F, Energy Conservation, energy conservation goals. Specifically, proposed Policy OS-8.1 would require implementation of the CAP strategies to improve energy efficiency and conservation, promote carbon-free energy sources, and reduce energy-related GHG emissions. Proposed Policy OS-8.5 would require the City to consider the energy efficiency of proposed development when making land use and development review decisions. As such, energy consumption under the proposed Project would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in potentially significant environmental

EXHIBIT C
701
impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation.

19. Energy Impact ENG-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

As stated in Draft EIR Section 3.6.4, page 3.6.29, future projects would be required to comply with the current and future iterations of the California Building Standards Code (CBSC), as applicable. Furthermore, proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would support the statewide goal of transitioning the electricity grid to renewable sources. Specifically, proposed Policy OS-8.6 would require the City to consider solar access during the design review process. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17, the net increase in energy demand associated with implementation of the proposed Project would be within the service capabilities of PG&E and Ava Energy and would not impede the provider’s ability to implement California’s renewable energy goals. In addition, as discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.8, the proposed Project would be consistent with the mitigation strategies of the 2022 CAP, which aim to improve alternative modes of transportation, renewable energy resource integration in new development, and energy efficiency in new development design.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

20. Energy Impact ENG-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to energy.

As included in Draft EIR Section 3.6.5, pages 3.6-29 and 3.6-30, all projects developed within the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and Ava Energy service area would implement the requirements of the CBSC and CALGreen and other federal, State, and local regulations, as applicable. Furthermore, new buildings would use new energy-efficient appliances and equipment, pursuant to the Appliance Efficiency Regulations. Future cumulative development could also increase annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and thus fuel consumption. However, vehicles would be subject to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for vehicular fuel efficiency, and average corporate fuel economy continues to increase as a result of State and federal laws, including the Pavley Advanced Clean Cars program.

Vehicle turnover also improves the overall fuel economy of California’s vehicle fleets. In addition, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would serve to reduce energy use as well as aligning with the state’s goals for carbon neutrality, Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to energy.

21. Geology and Soils Impact GEO-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not subject residents or occupants, visitors, etc. to potential seismic-related hazards, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking; (iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; or (iv) Landslides.

EXHIBIT C
702
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.7.4, pages 3.7-16 through 3.7-19, compliance with State, regional, and local regulations, as well as implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, pertaining to structural safety regarding fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides would ensure that future development would not directly or indirectly cause or worsen the likelihood of or substantial adverse effects from seismic hazards related to earthquakes, including the risk of loss, injury, or death. Specifically, proposed Policy S-6.2 would require a site-specific geotechnical investigation for new urban development approval in AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zones. Proposed Policy S-6.3 would prohibit new structures proposed for human occupancy across the trace of any active or potentially active fault. Proposed Policy S-6.4 would require the City to continue to enforce and identify unreinforced masonry buildings and other buildings that would be at risk during seismic events and strengthen these buildings. Proposed Policy S-6.5 would require a site-specific geotechnical investigation for all critical facilities that would mitigate site-specific challenges, including fault rupture. Compliance with these requirements would minimize structural damage and the exposure of people to risk of injury or death from structural failure in the event of surface fault rupture during an earthquake. Proposed Action S-A-6.1 would further support these policies by requiring detailed fault shear zone studies to define building setback requirements. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not subject residents or occupants, visitors, etc. to potential seismic-related hazards, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (1) rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; (ii) strong seismic ground shaking; (iii) seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; or (iv) landslides.

22.Geology and Soils Impact GEO-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.7.4, pages 3.7-19 and 3.7-20, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as well as adherence to existing regulatory requirements that include, but are not limited to, the California Building Code (CBC) and LMC grading and drainage requirements for new developments, would reduce potential soil erosion and loss of topsoil from soil disturbance. Specifically, proposed Policy S-6.8 would require applicants to implement control site preparation procedures and construction phasing to reduce erosion and exposure of soils to the maximum extent possible. Proposed Policy S-6.7 would prohibit construction in areas with severe erosion unless a geotechnical engineering analysis can demonstrate that the project will not contribute to increased erosion. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.

23. Geology and Soils Impact GEO-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause substantial hazards associated with future development on unstable geologic units or unstable soils, such as landslides, subsidence, liquefaction, lateral spreading, settlement, or collapse.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.7.4, pages 3.7-20 through 3.7-22, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as well as adherence to existing regulatory requirements that include, but are not limited to, the CBC, LMC, and LDC would ensure future development would not cause substantial hazards associated with development on unstable geologic units or unstable soils, such as landslides, subsidence, liquefaction, lateral spreading, settlement, or collapse. Specifically, proposed Policies S-6.2 and S-6.5 would require a site-specific geotechnical

EXHIBIT C
703
investigation for new urban development approval in areas subject to high or moderate geologic hazard, as well as critical facilities, so that structures are constructed in a manner that mitigates sitespecific geotechnical challenges and minimizes risk from unstable soils. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not cause substantial hazards associated with future development on unstable geologic units or unstable soils, such as landslides, subsidence, liquefaction, lateral spreading, settlement, or collapse.

24. Geology and Soils Impact GEO-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not directly or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects, including the risks to life or property, from expansive soils, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994).

As stated in Draft EIR Section 3.7.4, pages 3.7-22 and 3.7-23, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as well as compliance with existing State, regional, and local regulations, such as the CBC, LMC, and LDC, would ensure that future development would not directly or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects, including the risks to life or property from expansive soils. Specifically, proposed Policy S-6.9 would require geotechnical evaluations to confirm that development on expansive soils would not post risks of structural damage and to propose any additional design measures in foothill areas required to address topographic and sols movement concerns. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not directly or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects, including the risks to life or property, from expansive soils, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994).

25. Geology and Soils Impact GEO-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in development on soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater.

As stated in Draft EIR Section 3.7.4, pages 3.7-23 and 3.7-24, proposed General Plan 2045 Policy INF-3.1 would require structures with plumbing in the City Limit to connect to the public wastewater collection system area, which is coterminous with the UGB. Therefore, future development in the EIR Study Area is not anticipated to result in the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. In the event septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are required, LMC Chapter 13-32 would allow for the construction of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems provided that a special permit is granted by the City Council. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in development on soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater.

26.Geology and Soils Impact GEO-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource, site, or unique geologic feature.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.7.4, pages 3.7-24 and 3.7-25, compliance with federal, State, regional, and local regulations and implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goal and policies pertaining to paleontological resources would ensure that future development would not directly or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects to paleontological resources. Specifically, proposed Policy CI-5.2 requires that if resources, including paleontological resources, are discovered

EXHIBIT C
704
during construction, the immediate suspension of work in the area and a qualified professional shall evaluate the resource. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource, site, or unique geologic feature.

27.Geology and Soils Impact GEO-7: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to geological resources.

As stated in Draft EIR Section 3.7.5, pages 3.7-25 and 3.7-26, future cumulative development would be constructed utilizing current design and construction methodologies for earthquake resistant design as required by relevant regulations, such as the CBC, in addition to any local requirements, including the applicable policies and programs included in the applicable general plans and the applicable municipal codes. They would also be required to comply with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards, when and if required, which would ensure the protection of unique paleontological resources. Compliance with these requirements would reduce cumulative, development-related impacts that pertain to seismic events, erosion and loss of topsoil, unstable geologic units, expansive soils, use of septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems, or destruction of a unique paleontological unit. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to geological resources.

28.Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.4, pages 3.9-20 and 3.9-22, future development that would introduce hazardous materials to a site, or that would generate or result in the transportation of hazardous waste, would be regulated pursuant to federal, State, regional, and local laws, including the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies. Specifically, proposed Policy S-11.3 requires measures that promote the safe transport of hazardous materials, and Policy S-11.4 requires coordination with nearby jurisdictions for the transportation of hazardous materials and hazardous materials release response across jurisdictional boundaries. Proposed Policies S-11.7 and S-11.11 would promote the reduction of hazardous waste production and provide convenient access for disposal, which would reduce hazardous waste entering the waste stream. Proposed Policy 11.2 would ensure hazardous waste is only managed in areas with a land use designation of High Intensity Industrial, which would ensure it is managed in places where it would not expose residents or sensitive populations to hazardous waste. Policy S-11.10 would implement processing procedures and local siting criteria consistent with the Alameda County hazardous materials and waste management plans. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.

29. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.

EXHIBIT C
705
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.4, pages 3.9-22 through 3.9-24, compliance with the federal, State, regional, and local laws, as well as implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, would ensure future development would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Specifically, proposed Policy S-11.5 would require facilities subject to the City’s hazardous materials regulations to submit an emergency response plan. Proposed Policies S-11.6 and S-11.8 require investigations and remediation to ensure that soils, groundwater, and buildings affected by hazardous material releases from prior land uses, and lead and asbestos potentially present in building materials, would not have the potential to affect the environment or the health and safety of future property owners or users, consistent with State and Alameda County regulations. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment

30.Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.4, page 3.9-25, compliance with existing applicable local, State, and federal regulatory requirements and proposed General Plan 2045 goals would minimize the potential release of hazardous materials associated with development. Specifically, proposed Policies S-11.2 and S-11.10 would consider the siting of hazardous waste management facilities and implement processing procedure and local siting criteria consistent with the Alameda County hazardous materials and waste management plans. Proposed Policies S-11.6 and S-11.8 require investigations and remediation to ensure that soils, groundwater, and buildings affected by hazardous material releases from prior land uses, and lead and asbestos potentially present in building materials, would not have the potential to affect the environment or the health and safety of future users, such as a school, consistent with State and Alameda County regulations. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.

31. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in future development to be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.4, pages 3.9-25 and 3.9-26, compliance with applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations regarding cleanup and reuse of a listed hazardous materials site, as well as proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, would ensure future development would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

Specifically, proposed Policy S-11.6 requires investigations and remediation to ensure that soils, groundwater, and buildings affected by hazardous material releases from prior land uses, and lead and asbestos potentially present in building materials, would not have the potential to affect the environment or the health and safety of future property owners or users. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in future development to be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

EXHIBIT C
706

32. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.4, pages 3.9-27 and 3.9-28, compliance with the requirements of the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) as well as the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure that future development would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.

Specifically, proposed Policy S-12.1 would define, maintain, and enforce airport safety zones to minimize potential hazards associated with airport operations, and Policy S-12.2 would prohibit noise-sensitive or safety-sensitive uses in airport influence areas. Proposed Policy N-1.3 would require evaluation of potential noise impacts and recommend mitigation measures for development within the 2030 Airport Community Noise Equivalent Level Noise Contours, and Policy N-4.5 would encourage voluntary compliance with noise abatement procedures. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.

33.Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.4, pages 3.9-28 through 3.9-30, compliance with applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations regarding emergency response or emergency evacuation and proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure future development would not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Specifically, proposed Policy S-1.1 would require coordination with regional partners to conduct periodic mock exercises to ensure effective emergency preparedness and response, and Policy S-1.2 would support reliable emergency communication systems that provide timely warnings and updates to facilitate efficient evacuation during an emergency. Proposed Policy S-1.3 and S-2.4 would ensure adequate evacuation routes are provided for new development and throughout the EIR Study Area.

Proposed Actions S-A-1.2 through S-A-1.4 would further support these policies by working with other agencies to increase access to and participation in emergency response systems, conducting an evaluation study to identify evacuation routes and constraints, and coordinating with transit providers to develop evacuation plans for those with special access or functional needs. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

34.Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-7: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to hazards and hazardous materials.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.9.5, pages 3.9-30 and 3.9-31, while impacts resulting from hazardous materials tend to be site specific rather than cumulative in nature, other future projects in the eastern Alameda County region would be required to comply with federal, State, and local laws and policies, including the Tri-Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), and all applicable permitting requirements of the regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. Environmental review of specific development proposals, as applicable, would serve to reduce potential impacts. With respect to airport safety or noise hazards, only properties within designated airport influences areas are subject

EXHIBIT C
707
to airport land use compatibility requirements, and development within these areas must comply with the Alameda County ALUC. Other jurisdictions in the region are subject to a similar regulatory framework. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to hazards and hazardous materials.

35.Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.10.4, pages 3.10-21 through 3.10-25, compliance with State and local regulations, including the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Construction General Permit (CGP), the City’s BMPs, CALGreen, the LMC, and the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure that future development does not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Implementation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and construction BMPs would minimize pollutant discharges from soil disturbance and construction activities, while operational BMPs would reduce long-term pollutant loading from urban runoff. Specifically, proposed Policies INF-4.3 and INF-4.4 encourage minimizing impervious surfaces and installation of green stormwater infrastructure and other natural stormwater management infrastructure. Proposed Policies OS-3.1 and OS-3.3 would require the City to maintain and improve water quality by regulating runoff from urban uses. Proposed Actions INFA-4.1 and OS-A-3.1 would further support these policies by installing green stormwater infrastructure to reduce runoff and improve water quality and coordinating with other agencies to study areas potentially suitable for groundwater recharge. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.

36.Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the proposed Project would impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.10.4, pages 3.10-25 and 3.10-26, compliance with the LMC, requirements for new construction and water-efficient landscaping, and the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure that the proposed Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that it may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Specifically, proposed Policy OS-3.1 would require the City to maintain and improve the quality and quantity of groundwater and groundwater recharge areas. Proposed Policy OS-3.4 would require the City to coordinate with relevant agencies to support the sustainable management, protection, and recharge of the Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin and study areas potentially suitable for groundwater recharge to inform planning and land use development decisions. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the proposed Project would impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin.

EXHIBIT C
708

37. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.10.4, pages 3.10-26 through 3.10-30, through compliance with existing State and local regulations and BMPs, as well as implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, development would not result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on or off site; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed capacity of stormwater drainage systems; or impede or redirect flood flows. Specifically, proposed Policy S-6.8 would require developers to implement control site preparation procedures and construction phasing that would reduce erosion and exposure of soils to the maximum extent possible. Proposed Policy S6.7 and S-6.9 would require geotechnical engineering analysis to ensure that projects in areas with severe erosion or expansive soils would not contribute to increased erosion, sedimentation, or runoff.

Proposed Policy INF-4.1 and INF-4.6 requires the City to design public storm drainage improvements to carry appropriate design-year flows and coordinate with Zone 7 and other responsible agencies to maintain and improve the regional flood protection system. Proposed Policies INF-4.3 and INF-4.4 encourage minimizing impervious surfaces and installation of green stormwater infrastructure to reduce runoff. Proposed Policy INF-4.2 would require future development to evaluate how stormwater runoff would affect local and regional flood systems and requires projects to include plans for detention and drainage facilities to prevent increased flood risk.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows.

38. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the release of pollutants due to project inundation resulting from flood, tsunami, or seiche.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.10.4, pages 3.10-30 through 3.10-33, future development would be subject to the requirements of the LMC and the Tri-Valley LHMP, among other existing, applicable regulations, which would reduce the risks of inundation. Furthermore, as previously described, in coordination with the city, California Department of Water Resources is responsible for maintaining flood protection features in the EIR Study Area. Additionally, all future development would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis to assess impacts related to risk of pollutant release associated with flooding and inundation and would be required to address those impacts through compliance with applicable regulations. In addition, future projects would be required to comply with the proposed General Plan 2045 policies. Specifically, proposed Policy S7.3 would require new development in the 100-year flood zone to avoid obstructing flood flows, increasing erosion, flood risks, pollutant loads, or degrading water quality, and proposed Policy SEXHIBIT C 709

7.2 would limit modifications to designated floodways for the purpose of accommodating new development. Proposed Policies S-7.4 and S-7.5 would prohibit the construction of new critical facilities in the 100-year flood zone and require new public and private service facilities in flood zones to be floodproofed to or above the base flood elevation. Proposed Policies S-7.8 and S-7.9 would require collaboration with regional partners to identify and mitigate regional flood risks and coordination for post-flood recovery resources. Proposed Policy S-8.1 would ensure that the evacuation plan or dam inundation areas are accurate and up to date. Proposed Policy S-8.2 would ensure there is adequate funding for the inspections of Del Valle and Patterson dams and ensure that required maintenance is being carried out. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the release of pollutants due to project inundation resulting from flood, tsunami, or seiche.

39.Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.10.4, pages 3.10-33 and 3.10-34, adherence to the existing regulatory framework, including the SWRCB CGP, regional Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit, and LMC, would ensure that both surface and groundwater quality are protected during construction and ongoing development of future projects. The CGP requires preparation of a SWPPP, which incorporates BMPs to control sediment, erosion, and hazardous materials contamination of runoff during construction. Pursuant to the regional MS4 Permit, future development would be required to comply with stormwater permit requirements under Provision C.3. Future development would be required to comply with LMC Chapter 13.25 and implement the water-efficient requirements specified in the CALGreen and California Plumbing Codes and the MWELO requirements for water-efficient landscaping outline in LMC Chapter 13.25. In addition, proposed Policy OS-3.1 would require the City to maintain and improve the quality and quantity of groundwater and groundwater recharge areas. Proposed Policy OS-3.4 would require the City to coordinate with relevant agencies to support the sustainable management, protection, and recharge of the Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin and study areas potentially suitable for groundwater recharge to inform planning and land use development decisions. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project is consistent with and supports the objectives of both the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Basin Plan and the Alternative Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), and implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

40. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to hydrology and water quality.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.10.5, pages 3.10-34 through 3.10-36, because future development in both the EIR Study Area and regional watersheds would be required to comply with existing regulatory requirements described under Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD-1 through HYD-5, cumulative development would be consistent with and support the objectives of the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Basin Plan and the applicable GSP. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to hydrology and water quality.

41.Land Use and Planning Impact LUP-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not physically divide an established community.

EXHIBIT C
710
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.11.4, pages 3.11-5 through 3.11-7, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a change in land use or zoning that would cause the construction or removal of any physical features or means of access throughout the EIR Study Area or the region. The proposed Project promotes infill development and encourages higher density in already-developed areas. Additionally, the proposed Project would maintain the existing roadway patterns and would not include any new major roadways or other physical features through existing neighborhoods that would create new physical barriers in the EIR Study Area. The proposed General Plan 2045 contains goals and policies that are designed to promote orderly growth. Specifically, proposed Policy LU-1.5 would require new development to be designed to complement existing surroundings. Proposed Policy LU-1.7 and 1.9 would promote infill development in major commercial and transit-supportive development area and efficient use of land and infrastructure resources. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not physically divide an established community.

42.Land Use and Planning Impact LUP-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.11.4, pages 3.11-8 through 3.11-15, the proposed General Plan 2045 is the primary planning document for the City of Livermore. The proposed Project is intended to ensure consistency between the General Plan, LDC, regional plans, and federal and State laws and ensure there are no conflicts with these land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect that would result in a significant environmental impact. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

43.Land Use and Planning Impact LUP-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to land use.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.11.4, page 3.11-15, cumulative development would be governed by the applicable plans, programs, policies, and land use planning regulations which would ensure logical and orderly development and require discretionary review to ensure that projects do not divide an established community or result in environmental impacts due to inconsistency with applicable land use planning regulations including, but not limited to, the applicable general plans or any applicable Specific Plans. Cumulative development would also adhere to policies of the applicable municipal codes. Conformance with these land use planning regulations would be confirmed during project approval. For these reasons, cumulative projects would have a less than significant cumulative effect and the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to land use.

44.Mineral Resources Impact MIN-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan.

EXHIBIT C
711
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.12.4, pages 3.12-6 and 3.12-7, the EIR Study Area consists of regionally significant construction aggregate resource areas. The proposed General Plan 2045 Land Use Map retains the Open Space/Sand and Gravel (OSP/S&G) land use designation for most of the lands as designated in the existing General Plan as Resource Area Sector A-2. Some of the Resource Area Sectors and land that was designated Open Space/Sand and Gravel under the existing General Plan would be redesignated for agricultural, industrial office, and open space and park uses under the proposed General Plan 2045 land use map. The proposed redesignations to agricultural, industrial office, and open space and park uses would be compatible uses that would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resources recovery site. As such, there would be no permanent obstruction of the mineral resources designated as OSP/S&G, as shown on the proposed General Plan 2045 land use map, and there would be no loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan.

45.Noise Impact NOI-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.13.4, pages 3.13-49 through 3.13-52, because specific project-level information is not available at this time, it is not possible to quantify future vibration levels at vibration-sensitive receptors that may be near future operational vibration sources.

However, adherence to the FTA vibration standards as part of permit issuance for future projects and implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure impacts related to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels are less than significant.

Specifically, proposed Policy N-4.7 would require new projects that have the potential to generate substantial vibration to provide a vibration study that include attenuation measures to reduce such vibration to adhere to applicable standards. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels.

46. Noise Impact NOI-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive aircraft noise levels.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.13.4, pages 3.13-52 through 3.13-54, compliance with the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure future development would not be exposed to unacceptable aircraft noise impacts. Specifically, proposed Policy N-1.3 would require the City to apply the Noise Compatibility policies of the Livermore Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and evaluate potential noise impacts and recommend mitigation measures through discretionary review procedures such as environmental review, design review, and evaluation of use permits.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive aircraft noise levels.

47. Population and Housing Impact PH-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure).

EXHIBIT C
712
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.14.4, pages 3.14-5 through 3.14-8, the General Plan is the policy document that plans ahead to accommodate the amount of reasonably foreseeable growth for population, housing, and jobs given past growth trends and the ability of existing services and infrastructure to support future growth. Additionally, buildout of the proposed Project would be able to accommodate the potential 7th Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) cycle and most of the potential 8th RHNA cycle, which extends beyond the buildout horizon of the proposed Project.

The Land Use Element of the proposed General Plan 2045 contains goals and polies that are designed to minimized unplanned population growth. Specifically, proposed Policy LU-19.3 requires the City to remain engaged in current and future long-range plans, such as those prepared by Association of Bay Area Government and Metropolitan Transportation Commission, to influence and be aware of projected growth assumptions. Proposed Policy LU-1.3 requires the City to use this General Plan EIR as a foundation for future discretionary action and to require additional environmental reviews to evaluate the impacts of continued growth if development exceeds projected buildout. Proposed Action LU-A-1.1 would further support these policies by preparing development monitoring reports to track growth in the EIR Study Area. Consequently, while buildout under with the proposed Project would serve to accommodate expected population, housing, and job growth in the EIR Study Area, this growth would not represent unplanned population growth for which inadequate planning has occurred. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure).

48. Population and Housing Impact PH-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.14.4, pages 3.14-9 and 3.14-10, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in a net increase in density and utilization of infill or underutilized sites in existing urban areas. Therefore, displacement of people or housing would be temporary as redevelopment occurs. While the proposed General Plan 2045 focuses on infill development which may occur as redevelopment, identified infill areas are predominantly non-residential, and the proposed Project does not call for any large-scale development that would result in substantial displacement of existing housing. The scale of temporary removal of housing would be typical for urban development projects. Further, redevelopment in the EIR Study Area would occur largely on sites that are underutilized and/or with older structures that are past their useful life, and small levels of displacement that may occur would be addressed through compliance with the LMC and proposed General Plan goals and policies. Specifically, proposed Policies LU-1.2 and LU-3.1 would require the City to provide for a range of housing types, sizes, and affordability levels and Policies LU-8.5 and LU-8.6 would encourage the City to acquire property for public uses, such as housing, and allow residential development on quasi-public sites. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

49. Population and Housing Impact PH-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to unplanned population growth or displacement of substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

EXHIBIT C
713
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.14.5, pages 3.14-10 through 3.14-12, implementation of the proposed Project would not induce a substantial amount of unplanned population growth or growth for which inadequate planning has occurred, or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as described under Population and Housing Impact PH-1 and Impact PH-2, would provide adequate planning to accommodate the proposed new increase in growth in the EIR Study Area. Therefore, cumulative development would not induce substantial unplanned population growth, either directly or indirectly or result in the displacement of substantial numbers of existing people our housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

50. Public Services, Recreation Impact PS-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services, including fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.15.4, pages 3.15-19 through 3.15-28, it is expected that new growth under the proposed Project would most likely occur incrementally over the next 20 years. The potential need for new or physically altered governmental facilities would be assessed as development occurs. Mandatory adherence to the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would minimize impacts to public services and governmental facilities and ensure facilities and staffing for public services keep pace with development. Specifically, proposed Policies S-4.4 and S4.5 would require the City to strive to improve performance and efficiency of the LivermorePleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) by monitoring traffic conditions, call volume, and development to determine if any fire stations need to be relocated, or if there is a need for a new station(s), and provide firefighting equipment, facilities, and staffing sufficient to maintain adequate response times and meet performance standards. Proposed Policy S-3.2 would require annual review of the Livermore Police Department (LPD) staffing levels and development trends to determine whether additional police staffing or facilities are needed. A three-phase project was recommended to meet the LPD facilities and equipment deficiencies. Proposed Policy CS-1.1 would require coordination with Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to allow the district with opportunities to review and comment on future development projects and identify the type of school facilities that may be needed to serve the anticipated population growth. Proposed Policy OS-5.7 would require implementation of parkland standards that are consistent with the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (LARPD) standards. Proposed Policy OS-5.9 would require developers to provide land or in-lieu fees for parks, which would help facilitate the construction of parks. Proposed Policies OS5.8 and OS-5.10 would require coordination with LARPD to identify sites to maintain park service standards, prioritize new parks and park improvements in park-deficient neighborhoods, and identify funding sources for park acquisition and improvements and to update the in-lieu park fee ordinance and park facility fees to ensure they reflect current needs and support the development of parks, trails, and recreational facilities, which would ensure new residents have access to parks, stopping potential over usage of existing parks and recreational facilities. Proposed Policy CS-4.3 requires the maintenance of City funding of library operations or expansion of funding, as the City budget allows, to meet the community’s needs; this funding would allow the expansion of staffing and facilities to serve future buildout, as needed. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project

EXHIBIT C
714
would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services, including fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts.

51. Public Services, Recreation Impact PS-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.15.4, pages 3.15-28 and 3.15-29, as the City receives development applications for future development, those applications will be reviewed by the City for compliance with the policies of the General Plan to ensure that parks and recreational facilities keep pace with new development. Specifically, proposed Policies OS-5.1 and OS-5.3 require coordination with LARPD to provide a comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities that are efficient, accessible to all users, well-maintained, and equitably distributed throughout the community and to develop adequate neighborhood, community, and other appropriate park space and facilities in Livermore to serve foreseeable population increases. In addition, future development would be required to pay in-lieu fees in accordance with LMC Chapter 12.60. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated.

52. Public Services, Recreation Impact PS-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.15.4, page 3.15-29, the proposed General Plan 2045 Open Space and Conservation Element includes goals and policies to ensure adequate parks and recreational facilities are available to serve the community and keep pace with development.

Specifically, proposed Policies OS-5.1 and OS-5.3 require coordination with LARPD to provide a comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities that are efficient, accessible to all users, well-maintained, and equitably distributed throughout the community and to develop adequate neighborhood, community, and other appropriate park space and facilities in Livermore to serve foreseeable population increases. Construction or expansion of recreational facilities would require permitting and review in accordance with City standards, which would ensure that any environmental impacts are disclosed and mitigated. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.

53. Public Services, Recreation Impact PS-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to public services or recreation.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.15.5, pages 3.15-30 through 3.15-32, future development would be required to undergo project review at the time of project application, and each proposed development would be assessed for impacts to fire protection services, police services, school services, library services, and park and recreation services. Construction or alteration of public service facilities would also be reviewed for compliance with the policies and

EXHIBIT C
715
programs of the General Plan and Municipal Code of the appropriate jurisdiction, and such construction would be subject to separate project-level environmental review pursuant to CEQA, as required, to identify potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures, if needed. With adequate planning in place in both the EIR Study Area and the areas served by the service providers, the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact on public services, parks, or recreation. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to public services or recreation.

54.Transportation Impact TRANS-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, and pedestrian facilities.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.16.4, pages 3.16-11 through 3.16-21, the proposed Project supports public transit and improvements to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. It would promote and direct the City to expand the pedestrian and bicycle network, close gaps in the transportation network, and coordinate with regional agencies to improve the transit network.

Implementation of these proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would support plans and programs to increase travel by transit. Specifically, proposed Policy MO-2.2 promotes safe and feasible alternative transportation facilities to encourage ridership, and proposed Policies MO-4.2, MO-4.3, and MO-4.4 encourage collaboration with other transit providers to improve and expand transit connections. Proposed Actions MO-A-4.1 and MO-A-4.2 would further support these policies by providing strategies to spur the development of transit-supportive infrastructure and regional transportation improvements. Implementation of proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would also support programs to reduce overall vehicle usage and VMT, as well as support programs, plans, ordinances, pr policies addressing the roadway network. Specifically, proposed Policy MO2.2 would provide safe and feasible alternative transportation, and Policy MO-2.4 would promote implementation of transportation demand management to reduce VMT. Proposed Actions MO-A2.1, MO-A-5.1, and MO-A-8.4 would further support these policies through the adoption of a transportation demand management ordinance for new developments, which would incorporate tiered trip reduction and VMT reduction targets; implementation of the City’s Vision Zero Plan to make roadways safer through street, speed management, and safe crossings; and amending the LMC to establish curbside management requirements. Implementation of proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would also improve the bicycle and pedestrian network and support programs to increase bicycle and pedestrian travel. Specifically, proposed Policy MO-3.2 aims to improve connectivity for bicycle and pedestrians, and Policy MO-3.7 encourages multimodal street design that integrates bike lanes, bus stops, crosswalks, curb ramps, and other roadway features. Proposed Actions MO-A-5.1, MO-A-7.1, and MO-A-8.3 further support these policies by implementing the City’s Vision Zero Plan to make roadways safer through street design, speed management, and safe crossings; developing and implementing a parking strategy for the downtown area; and installing bicycle racks and bicycle storage facilities in areas where more bicycle parking would be beneficial.

Overall, implementation of proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would generally improve the circulation system. Specifically, proposed Policy MO-6.1 would ensure consistency between circulation and land uses, and Policy MO-6.3 would develop transportation impact guidelines to mitigate transportation impacts of future projects. Proposed Policies MO-12.1 and MO-12.3 require coordination with other transportation agencies and neighboring jurisdictions to align transportation planning. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, and pedestrian facilities.

EXHIBIT C
716

55.Transportation Impact TRANS-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b).

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.16.4, pages 3.16-22 through 3.16-24, the anticipated changes in VMT from the baseline conditions to the projected 2045 conditions indicate that future development, especially mixed-use projects, could be successful in reducing VMT by increasing access to job opportunities and essential services within shorter distances. As a result of the reduced distances, there would be a decrease in VMT per capita. Moreover, these shorter trips would also reduce VMT by promoting the use of alternative modes of transportation such as bicycling and walking. In addition, the same proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies identified under Transportation Impact TRANS-1 would promote alternative modes of transportation, such as public transit, bicycling, and walking, encouraging more individuals to choose non-auto modes of transportation, decreasing their reliance on private vehicles. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b).

56.Transportation Impact TRANS-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.16.4, page 3.16-24, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would promote improvements to the transportation network that are designed to be safe for all modes of travel. Compliance with State regulations on roadway and facility design, materials, and signage would further minimize the potential for impact.

Specifically, proposed Policy MO-5.8 would require the City to maintain engineering design standards for each street classification. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).

57.Transportation Impact TRANS-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in inadequate emergency access.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.16.4, page 3.16-25, the proposed Project recommends various transportation and green infrastructure improvements. Future development would be subject to the requirements in the LDC, which includes requirements for emergency access, and would be reviewed by public safety officials for compliance with applicable safety, fire, and building codes as part of the City’s standard entitlement process. Furthermore, proposed General Plan 2045 policies discussed under Transportation Impact TRANS-1 would also ensure adequate emergency access.

The provision of adequate emergency access would be accomplished by considering access routes, developing and updating emergency response plans, and incorporating emergency access considerations in the design of future street improvements. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in inadequate emergency access.

58.Transportation Impact TRANS-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to transportation.

EXHIBIT C
717
As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.16.5, pages 3.16-25 and 3.16-26, compliance with existing federal, State, and local regulations, as well as implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, as described in Transportation Impact TRANS-1 through Impact TRANS-4, would ensure that the proposed Project would not have a cumulatively significant impact related to transportation. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to transportation.

59.Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17.4, pages 3.17-48 through 3.17-62, compliance with existing federal, state, and local regulatory requirements, including the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would ensure that the proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities beyond what has already been planned.

Proposed Policies INF-2.6, INF-2.8, and INF-2.9 require new development projects to in the City Limit to connect to the water system and be responsible for constructing adequate potable water distribution system and paying water connection fees to construct additional necessary storage, pumping, and distribution facilities and require the City to condition the approval of new development on the availability of sufficient water supply, storage, and pressure requirements from the City or other water purveyors. Specifically, proposed Policies INF-2.6, INF-2.8, and INF-2.9 require new development projects in the City Limit to connect to the water system and be responsible for constructing adequate potable water distribution systems and paying water connection fees to construct additional necessary storage, pumping, and distribution facilities and require the City to condition the approval of new development on the availability of sufficient water supply, storage, and pressure requirements from the City or other water purveyors. Proposed Policy INF-3.1 would require new development projects to in the City Limit to connect to the public wastewater system. Proposed Policy INF-3.2 would require the City to condition the approval of new development on the availability of adequate long-term capacity of wastewater treatment, conveyance, and disposal sufficient to serve the proposed development areas. Proposed Policy INF4.2 and INF-4.3 would require new development and major redevelopment projects to evaluate how stormwater runoff will affect local and regional drainage and flood systems and minimize impervious surfaces and integrate green infrastructure to assist in stormwater management. Proposed Policy INF-4.1 would require the City to design public storm drainage improvements to carry appropriate design-year flows to accommodate large storm events. Proposed Policy OS-8.1 would require implementation of the CAP strategies to improve energy efficiency and conservation, promote carbon-free energy sources, and reduce energy-related GHG emissions. Proposed Policy OS-8.5 would require the City to consider the energy efficiency of proposed development when making land use and development review decisions. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects

EXHIBIT C
718

60. Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a shortage of water supply, and future development would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17.4,. pages 3.17-62 and 3.17-63, both Cal Water and Livermore Municipal Water have sufficient water supplies available during normal years and a fiveyear drought period to accommodate future development. In addition, compliance with the LMC requirements for new construction and adherence to the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would reduce water demand. Specifically, proposed Policy INF-2.2 would require increased water efficiency in all new development and existing building stock and proposed Policy INF-2.4 and INF-2.5 promote recycling and reusing water where appropriate. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a shortage of water supply, and future development would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.

61.Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the proposed Project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17.4, page 3.17-63, with continued compliance with all applicable regulations, wastewater generated by the proposed Project would not exceed the capacity of Livermore Water Reclamation Plant. In addition, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies would further reduce demand. Specifically, proposed Policy 3.2 would require the City to condition the approval of new development on the availability of adequate longterm capacity of wastewater treatment, conveyance, and disposal sufficient to serve the proposed development areas. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the proposed Project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

62.Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17.4, pages 3.17-64 through 3.17-66, with continued compliance with the applicable regulations, leading to increased recycling and waste diversion, and implementation of the proposed 2045 General Plan goals and policies, the proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of local standards, in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Specifically, proposed Policy INF5.2 would require the City to meet or exceed State and County waste diversion and recycling requirements and implement efforts that will aid in minimizing waste. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.

EXHIBIT C
719

63. Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17.4, page 3.17-66, the Vasco Road Landfill and Altamont Landfill together provide sufficient permitted capacity to meet the County’s AB 939 requirement to maintain a minimum of 15 years of available landfill capacity. Compliance with AB 1826 would be achieved through organic waste recycling and surplus food recovery programs, including the donation of edible food to local food banks. LMC Chapter 8.08 establishes local requirements for organics recycling for residential, commercial, and institutional uses. Future development would be required to comply with Division 4.4 of the most current CALGreen Code, which requires that a minimum of 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition debris from nonresidential construction be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse. New development and redevelopment would also be required to comply with AB 341, which mandates recycling for residential, commercial, and multifamily land uses. In addition, the INF Element of the proposed General Plan 2045 contains goals and policies that require local planning and development decisions to reduce solid waste generation by promoting diversion and recycling. Specifically, proposed Policy INF-5.2 would require the City to meet or exceed State and County waste diversion and recycling requirements and implement efforts that will aid in minimizing waste. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.

64.Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to utilities and service systems.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.17.5, pages 3.17-66 through 3.17-69, all cumulative projects would be required to comply with existing federal, state, and other local regulatory requirements as well as proposed General Plan goals and policies described under Utilities and Service Systems Impact USS-1 through Impact USS-5. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to utilities and service systems.

65. Wildfire Impact WF-1: Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.18.4, pages 3.18-20 through 3.18-22, future development would be required to comply with adopted State, regional, and local plans and regulations addressing emergency access, response, and evacuation, including the CBC, CFC, LMC, and applicable proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies. Specifically, proposed Policy S-1.2 would require the expansion and maintenance of reliable emergency communication systems that provide timely warnings and updates, which would help facilitate evacuation in case of emergency.

Proposed Policy S-1.3 would require the City to maintain and improve designated evacuation routes and coordinate with regional transportation agencies to ensure the safety and integrity of Stateowned evacuation routes. Proposed Actions S-A-1.2 through S-A-1.4 would further support these policies by working with other agencies to increase access to and participation in emergency response systems, conducting an evaluation study to identify evacuation routes and constraints, and coordinating with transit providers to develop evacuation plans for those with special access or functional needs. Compliance with these regulations would ensure future development can be adequately served by emergency response systems operating under the Livermore Emergency

EXHIBIT C
720
Operations Plan and the Tri-Valley LHMP. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

66.Wildfire Impact WF-2: Implementation of the proposed Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.18.4, pages 3.18-22 through 3.18-26, compliance with existing State and local regulatory requirements such as the CBC, CFC, California Wildland-Urban Interface Code (CWUIC), PRC Section 4291, and the LMC, as well as implementation of the proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, would ensure future development would not expose people to the uncontrolled spread of wildfire or pollutant concentrations due to slope, prevailing winds, or other factors. Specifically, proposed Policy S-5.3 would prohibit development in areas where exposure of slopes cannot be suitably revegetated to substantially reduce fire hazards.

Proposed Policies S-5.5 and S-5.8 would require review of development proposals in fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) for site design criteria and appropriate preventative and self-protective measures as well as adherence to the California Fire Safe Regulations and the Fire Hazard Reduction Around Buildings and Structures Regulations. Proposed Policies S-5.5 and S-5.8 would require review of development proposals in FHSZ for site design criteria and appropriate preventative and self-protective measures as well as adherence to the California Fire Safe Regulations and the Fire Hazard Reduction Around Buildings and Structures Regulations. Proposed Policy S-1.4 requires the City to establish a network of equitably located resilience hubs that offer refuge from poor air quality due to regional wildfire smoke. Proposed Policy S-5.10 would require regular debris and brush clearing along public and private roads and implementation of the Annual Vegetation Management Program through the LPFD to remove hazardous vegetation on unimproved and undeveloped lots to ensure they are maintained in a fire-safe manner. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors.

67.Wildfire Impact WF-3: Implementation of the proposed Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.18.4, pages 3.18-26 and 3.18-27, infrastructure and maintenance activities would be required to comply with the adopted State regulations, CBC, CFC, CWUIC, LMC, and the proposed General Plan 2045 policies, as applicable, which would reduce exacerbating wildfire risks associated with the installation or maintenance of such infrastructure.

Specifically, proposed General Plan 2045 Policy S-1.3 would require the City to maintain and improve designated evacuation routes, including roadway repairs and vegetation management, and coordinate with regional transportation agencies to ensure the safety and integrity of State-owned evacuation routes. Proposed Policy S-5.11 would require regular debris and brush clearing along public and private roads. These policies would serve to ensure such roadways are properly maintained, including removal of vegetation, as necessary, to reduce wildfire risk. Policies S-4.8 would ensure that existing and future development have sufficient water supplies for fire-fighting purposes and structural suppression. Policy S-10.10 would require undergrounding of existing

EXHIBIT C
721
electrical utilities throughout the EIR Study Area, consistent with LMC Chapter 13.48, which would reduce the ignition risk of such infrastructure. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment.

68.Wildfire Impact WF-4: Implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.18.4, pages 3.18-28 and 3.18-29, future development would be required to comply with adopted State, regional, and local plans and regulations addressing wildfire prevention, including the CBC, LMC, Tri-Valley LHMP, Livermore Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and proposed General Plan 2045 goals and policies, which would minimize risks of postfire hazards, such as slope instability or drainage changes. Specifically, proposed Policies S-6.2 and S-6.7 would require site-specific geotechnical investigation for development approval in areas of high landslides susceptibility and prohibit construction in areas susceptible to slope failure, unless it can be clearly demonstrated through geotechnical engineering analysis that the project will not contribute to increased erosion, sedimentation, or runoff. Proposed Policy S-7.3 would require new development in the 100-year flood zone to avoid obstructing flood flows, increasing erosion, flood risks, pollutant loads, or degrading water quality. Proposed Action S-A-6.1 would further support these policies by requiring detailed fault shear zone studies to define building setback requirements.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes.

69.Wildfire Impact WF-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to wildfire.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.18.5, page 3.18-30, future potential development in the EIR Study Area and the surrounding region would be required to consider potential impairment to any applicable emergency response plan or evacuation plan as approved under that applicable authority. Additionally, future development in the EIR Study Area and the surrounding region would be required to comply with the same State and regional regulations as discussed in Wildfire Impact WF-1 through Wildfire Impact WF-5, as applicable, such as PRC Section 4291, CBC, CFC, CWUIC and the Tri-Valley LHMP. Lands throughout eastern Alameda County would also implement wildfire reduction strategies through implementation of the Alameda County CWPP, Alameda County EOP, the Alameda County LHMP, applicable goals and policies in the Alameda County General Plan, and the Alameda County Municipal Code. These provisions establish requirements for ignition-resistant building materials, ember-resistant attic vents, enclosed eaves, fire-resistant decking, and the maintenance of defensible space consistent with PRC Section 4291. Compliance with these regulations would reduce the potential for structure ignition and wildfire spread and associated postfire hazards. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a cumulative effect related to wildfire.

EXHIBIT C
722
F. NO IMPACT DETERMINATIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR
CEQA Guidelines Section 15128, Effects Not Found to be Significant, allows environmental issues for which there is no likelihood of significant impact to be “scoped out” and not analyzed further in the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR identified the following No Impact determinations:

1. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Impact AGR-5: Implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in PRC Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)).

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 5.1, page 5-1, the EIR Study Area does not contain any national- or State-designated forestland and the woodland/forest communities do not qualify as forest land (as defined in PRC Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)).

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in PRC Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)).

2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Impact AGR-6: Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 5.1, page 5-1, the EIR Study Area does not contain any national- or State-designated forestland and the woodland/forest communities do not qualify as forest land (as defined in PRC Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)).

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

3. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Impact AGR-7: Implementation of the proposed Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

As discussed in Draft EIR Section 5.1, page 5-1, the EIR Study Area does not contain any national- or State-designated forestland and the woodland/forest communities do not qualify as forest land (as defined in PRC Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)).

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of forest land to nonforest use.

G. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
When making findings, the lead agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the mitigation measures it has adopted or made a condition of Project approval to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The City hereby adopts the MMRP for the proposed Project, included as an attachment to these findings. The mitigation measures identified in the EIR to reduce

EXHIBIT C
723
significant impacts are adopted and incorporated into the proposed Project and will be monitored pursuant to the MMRP.

H. ALTERNATIVES
The Draft EIR evaluated two alternatives to the proposed Project. The City Council has reviewed the significant unavoidable impacts associated with each alternative as compared with the proposed Project and has also considered each alternative’s feasibility, considering a range of economic, environmental, social, and legal factors. Overall, the City Council concludes that the two alternatives to the proposed Project are infeasible and less desirable than the proposed Project. The City Council’s analysis and conclusions are described below.

1. Alternative A: No Project Alternative (Existing General Plan): Under the No Project Alternative (Alternative A), future development would continue to be subject to existing policies, regulations, development standards, and land use designations of the existing 2003 General Plan. Alternative A would not implement the LMC and LDC amendments associated with the proposed General Plan 2045. Therefore, Alternative A would not incorporate new topics that are now required by State law, such as those related to Housing, Safety, and Environmental Justice Elements, and would not revise relevant goals and policies to meet those requirements.

Alternative A would not establish an updated policy framework to guide Livermore’s physical development, protect its resources, or provide adequate infrastructure and public services to accommodate future development and population increases through 2045.

Therefore, Alternative A would not provide for orderly growth within the city. Further, Alternative A would not plan for diverse housing or meet the State-mandated Regional Needs Allocation requirements for the current and estimated future housing cycles through 2045. Alternative A would not plan for future circulation or infrastructure improvements.

Further, Alternative A would only partially meet other project objectives related to the provision of mixed-use, infill development intended to promote fiscal sustainability within Livermore. Alternative A would also not meet the project objectives to promote Livermore’s long-term fiscal sustainability.

2. Alternative B: Reduced Industrial and Concentrated Residential Alternative: The Reduced Industrial and Concentrated Residential Alternative (Alternative B) assumes that like the proposed Project, the General Plan would be updated and the associated amendments to the LMC and LDC would be adopted. However, its primary objective is to avoid development on lands with important agricultural or mineral resource value. This alternative would not be able to fully accommodate the square footage allowed under the industrial designations as proposed in the General Plan 2045 land use map because there is not sufficient industrial land available within the UGB. Therefore, Alternative B would result in less industrial square footage and accordingly result in fewer jobs when compared to the proposed Project, which could result in a jobs-to-housing imbalance and residents commuting to other communities for work. In addition, by reducing the amount of industrial square footage, Alternative B would provide for less tax-generating land uses. Therefore, this alternative does not meet the project objectives to the same degree as the proposed Project.

EXHIBIT C
724
I. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
As set forth herein, there are significant adverse environmental impacts to agricultural resources, air quality, GHG emissions, mineral resources, and noise, which were identified in the Final EIR, but cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level at the programmatic level. CEQA requires the decision makers to balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining to approve a project. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the information in the Draft and Final EIR and the administrative record and makes the following overriding considerations based on its independent judgment.

Although alternatives have been identified that would reduce the severity of significant and unavoidable impacts, due to the programmatic nature of the proposed Project, it is not feasible to determine if the alternatives would result in full avoidance of the significant and unavoidable impacts. Further, the alternatives would undermine key Project objectives including accommodating required housing capacity, supporting economic development, and reducing VMT (see Section 2.5 in Chapter 2, Project Description, of the Draft EIR for the list of Project objectives).

Therefore, the City of Livermore finds that the benefits of the proposed Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, and that these benefits, on an individual basis and collectively, outweigh each of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR.

These social, economic, legal, and other benefits are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and constitute overriding considerations justifying approval of the proposed Project:

1. Approval of the proposed Project advances key Project objectives to achieve the City’s planning vision into horizon year 2045, updating goals, policies, and actions so that they meet current State requirements and community priorities (Objective 1).

2. Approval of the proposed Project advances key Project objectives to promote infill development to allow for housing and job growth within the UGB, also supporting the development of diverse housing choices for all individuals and meeting the State-mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation requirements for the current and estimated future housing cycles through 2045 (Objectives 2 and 4).

3. Approval of the proposed Project would proactively plan for projected population growth and development within the city through horizon year 2045, allowing for sustainable buildout by adopting goals and policies to protect natural resources, safeguard residents against natural and human-caused hazards, and provide adequate public services and infrastructure (Objectives 1, 8, 9, and 10).

4. Approval of the proposed Project would support key Project objectives to plan for vibrant, mixed-use districts that have access to an enhanced circulation system and multi-modal transportation opportunities, including regional rail and local transit services (Objectives 3 and 7).

5. Approval of the proposed Project would advance key Project objectives to promote Livermore’s long-term fiscal sustainability by identifying development types, intensities, and locations that generate sufficient public revenues to fund infrastructure, services, and maintenance over time (Objective 6).

6. Approval of the proposed Project would allow a diverse range of jobs and businesses to support a thriving and resilient economy and to increase the opportunity for Livermore residents to work in Livermore (Objective 5).

EXHIBIT C
725
J. RECIRCULATION NOT REQUIRED
No new significant impacts, substantial increases in impact severity, or new feasible mitigation measures were identified during the public comment process. The Final EIR responds to comments and makes only minor technical changes, clarifications, or additions to the Draft EIR. The minor revisions to the Draft EIR do not identify any new significant impacts or substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts. The revisions are for clarification purposes only and do not change the conclusions of the Draft EIR. The City has independently reviewed these revisions and determined that none of the conditions requiring recirculation under CEQA Guidelines Section15088.5 have been met. Therefore, recirculation of the Draft EIR is not required.

K. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Various documents and other materials constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council base their findings and decisions contained herein. The record includes, but is not limited to:
• The EIR, which consists of the Draft and Final EIR, technical appendices, staff reports, documents, studies, memoranda, maps, testimony, and other materials related thereto; • All public notices issued by the City in connection with the Project and the preparation of the Draft and Final EIR;
• All written comments and oral communications submitted by agencies or interested members of the general public during the public review periods for the Draft and Final EIR including oral communications made at public hearings;
• All matters of common knowledge to the members of the City’s Planning Commission and City Council, including but not limited to: (i) the City’s existing General Plan, zoning ordinance, and other applicable policies and ordinances; (ii) information regarding the City’s fiscal status and economic and development patterns and trends; (iii) federal, state and local laws, regulations, guidelines and publications applicable to or affecting the Project; and (iv) reports, projections, documents and other materials regarding statewide, regional, and local planning and development matters within and outside of the City; and • All other documents and materials relating to the Project as described in PRC Section 21167.6, as applicable.

Documents related to this Project can be found at the Livermore Community Development Department, Planning Division, 1052 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA during normal business hours.

L. FINDINGS REGARDING PREPARATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE EIR The City Council finds, with respect to the City’s preparation, review and consideration of the EIR, that:
• The City exercised its independent judgment in accordance with PRC Section 21082.1(c) in retaining the independent consulting firm Placeworks to prepare the EIR, and Placeworks prepared the EIR under the supervision and at the direction of the City, and the EIR reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.

EXHIBIT C
726
• The City circulated the Draft EIR for review by responsible and trustee agencies and the public, and submitted it to the State Clearinghouse for review and comment by state agencies, as required by CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.
• The EIR and the proposed Project were presented to the City’s Planning Commission, which reviewed and considered, and conducted a public hearing thereon. The Planning Commission determined that the EIR was adequate and sufficient, and prepared in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and recommended to the City Council that the City Council certify the EIR and approve the Project.
• The EIR and the proposed Project were presented to the City Council of the City, with the recommendation of the City’s Planning Commission. The City Council reviewed and considered, and conducted a public hearing on, the EIR and proposed Project. • The EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.

M. SUMMARY
Based on the foregoing Findings and the information contained in the record, it is determined that:
• All significant effects on the environment due to the approval of the Livermore General Plan 2045 Project have been eliminated or substantially lessened where feasible. • Any remaining significant effects on the environment found to be unavoidable are acceptable due to the factors described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section I.

EXHIBIT C
727
City of Livermore
LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045
June 2026 | Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program .,

EXHIBIT D
728
June 2026 | Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045
For City of Livermore
City of Livermore
Contact Shannon Pagan, Senior Planner
1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, California 94550
925.960.4482
Prepared by:

PlaceWorks
2040 Bancroft Way, Suite 400
Berkeley, California 94704
510.848.3815
www.placeworks.com

EXHIBIT D
729
JUNE 2026 1

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the Livermore General Plan 2045 pursuant to the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15097, Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting. The purpose of this MMRP is to ensure the implementation of mitigation measures identified as part of the environmental review for the proposed Project. The lead agency may choose whether its program will monitor mitigation, report on mitigation, or both. This MMRP includes the following information:
▪ The full text of the mitigation measures;
▪ The party responsible for implementing the mitigation measures; ▪ The timing for implementation of the mitigation measures; and ▪ The agency responsible for monitoring the implementation.

EXHIBIT D
730
LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MITIGATION MONIT ORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
2 PlaceWorks
Mitigation Measures
Party Responsible for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Agency Responsible
for Monitoring

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Prior to the issuance of entitlements for a project, applicants or sponsors of projects on sites where migratory or nesting birds are present shall implement bird-safe design measures for all development projects where a qualified biologist, approved by the City of Livermore (City), determines that migratory or resident birds could be affected. This requirement shall apply to projects adjacent to or incorporating riparian corridors, wetlands, open-space areas, or other natural habitat features, or as otherwise determined by the qualified biologist.

Bird-safe design considerations and management strategies shall include avoiding the use of highly reflective glass that appears to reproduce natural habitat and may attract birds; limiting reflectivity and using nonattractive surface treatments; applying low-reflectivity glass or other glazing treatments across the entirety of the building’s glass surfaces, not only at lower levels; reducing interior light during evening hours through lighting control systems for commercial buildings; directing exterior lighting downward and screening it to minimize night-time illumination of the building exterior, except as needed for safety and security; avoiding glass skyways, freestanding glass walls, and transparent building corners; eliminating transparent glass at rooflines, including in conjunction with green roofs; and covering roof mechanical equipment with low-profile angled roofing to minimize obstacles to bird flight.

Project applicants shall demonstrate incorporation of bird-safe design measures in project plans and provide documentation of biologist review during entitlement or permitting stages. The City shall verify compliance before issuance of building or grading permits.

Project applicant or
sponsor
Prior to issuance of
building or grading
permits, or other
entitlements
City of Livermore

EXHIBIT D
731
LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MITIGATION MONIT ORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
JUNE 2026 3
Mitigation Measures
Party Responsible for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Agency Responsible
for Monitoring

CULTURAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: If any buried historical or archaeological resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop within a 100-foot radius of the find and the qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study.

If it is determined that the find is significant, then the qualified archaeologist shall make recommendations to the Lead Agency (City of Livermore) on the feasible measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially significant historical or archaeological resources consist of, but are not limited to, stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. If the discovered resource is determined or suspected to be of Native American origin, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 shall apply, and consultation with a representative from the consulting Tribe(s) shall be conducted in accordance with that measure.

Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within a project site shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA Guidelines.

If the relevant resources (if any) are determined to be historical resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines or a unique archaeological resource in Section 21083.2 of the Public Resources Code, feasible mitigation measures and an archaeological treatment plan shall be developed by the qualified archaeologist and recommended to the project applicant or sponsor and the Lead Agency.

Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the find(s) as detailed in the archaeological treatment plan. No further grading or ground disturbance Project applicant or
sponsor; Construction
contractor; Qualified
archaeologist
During construction
upon discovery of
buried historical or
archaeological
resources
City of Livermore

EXHIBIT D
732
LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MITIGATION MONIT ORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
4 PlaceWorks
Mitigation Measures
Party Responsible for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Agency Responsible
for Monitoring
shall occur within 100 feet of the discovery of a significant historical or archaeological resource until the relevant mitigation measures are approved by the Lead Agency and implemented by the project applicant or sponsor to protect these resources. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for unique archaeological resources is being carried out.

Mitigation Measure CUL-4: If any buried TCRs are discovered, or are suspected to be of Native American origin, during grading or excavation, the construction contractor shall halt all ground-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the find. The contractor shall immediately notify the Lead Agency (City of Livermore). The City shall notify and consult with a representative from the consulting Tribe(s), consistent with applicable confidentiality provisions under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

If the City, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), determines that the resource is a TCR and significant pursuant to CEQA, the City shall require the retention of a Tribal representative and, if appropriate, a qualified archaeologist, at the applicant’s expense, to prepare a mitigation plan.

The mitigation plan shall be developed and implemented in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s) and shall prioritize avoidance of the resources. If avoidance is not feasible, the plan shall identify appropriate culturally sensitive treatment measures in coordination with the consulting Tribe(s). Such measures may include, but are not limited to, protection of the cultural character and integrity of the resources, protection of traditional uses, confidentiality of sensitive information, or heritage recovery. The City/Tribe(s) may require tribal or other qualified cultural resource monitors during construction to ensure that resources are properly identified and protected.

Project applicant or
sponsor; Construction
contractor
During construction
upon discovery of
buried tribal cultural
resources
City of Livermore;
Consulting Tribe(s)

EXHIBIT D
733
LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MITIGATION MONIT ORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
JUNE 2026 5
Mitigation Measures
Party Responsible for
Implementation
Implementation
Timing
Agency Responsible
for Monitoring
Documentation of consultations, treatment measures, and resource protection actions shall be maintained in the project record. Grounddisturbing activities within the buffer area shall not resume until the resource has been evaluated and appropriate treatment measures, developed in consultation with the Tribe(s), have been approved by the City and implemented. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for TCRs is being carried out.

EXHIBIT D
734
LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN 2045

CITY OF LIVERMORE

MITIGATION MONIT ORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
6 PlaceWorks
This page is intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT D
735
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN 2045
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 21-003)
Livermore General Plan 2045 updates the City’s 2003-2025 General Plan and establishes a long-term vision, goals, policies, implementation actions and land use designations to guide future decision making related to growth, development, and resource conservation through horizon year 2045 (referred to herein as the “Project” or “General Plan”). The General Plan addresses State required elements as well as locally important topics, including land use, housing, mobility, infrastructure, economic development, climate resilience, healthy communities, open space protection, and Downtown and South Livermore vitality.

Livermore General Plan 2045 Safety Element incorporates by reference the current Tri-Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), as required by AB 2140 to increase opportunities for financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act. The LHMP was developed in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and followed the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan guidance.

In 2021, City Council identified the Project as a priority and authorized the formation of a General Plan Advisory Committee and a multi-year work program to prepare a revised General Plan document and conduct environmental review.

The City initiated a General Plan Amendment Application (GPA21-003) to comprehensively update the City's General Plan by replacing the existing 2003–2025 General Plan with the General Plan 2045.

Between 2021 and 2026, preparation of the General Plan included an extensive community engagement process, including 36 General Plan Advisory Committee Meetings, that helped shape the Project’s priorities and policy direction.

In February 2026, the Draft General Plan was released for public review and is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

On April 1, 2026, the General Plan Advisory Committee reviewed the Draft General Plan, provided feedback for Planning Commission and City Council consideration, and recommended adoption of the General Plan.

On April 21, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed the Draft General Plan, considered the General Plan Advisory Committee feedback, and provided recommended revisions and clarification to policies and the Land Use Map.

On May 11, 2026, the City Council reviewed the Draft General Plan, considered the General Plan Advisory Committee and Planning Commission’s recommendations, 736
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
approved modifications to improve clarity and strengthen policy direction, and directed staff to proceed with finalizing the draft document for adoption.

Following Council direction, City staff incorporated additional refinements, including minor updates to the Land Use Map and edits to General Plan policies and actions as shown in Exhibit C attached hereto.

The proposed General Plan is supported by a Final Environmental Impact Report prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and provides a balanced and comprehensive framework for future decision making.

At a duly noticed public hearing on July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the Project and staff recommendation, heard public testimony, made the necessary findings and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 12-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, containing the Planning Commission’s actions and/or recommendations thereon. The Planning Commission additionally adopted Resolution No. 11-26 recommending the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan 2045.

On July 27, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the Record Evidence and adopted a resolution certifying an Environmental Impact Report.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 12-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this Resolution. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby approves Livermore General Plan 2045 (GPA21- 003), attached as Exhibit B, subject to the revisions identified in Errata Sheet (dated July 7, 2026) and attached hereto as Exhibit C.
737
3 RESOLUTION NO. ________
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore California.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on July 27, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Helena Graves Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 12-26
Exhibit B – Livermore General Plan 2045
Exhibit C – Livermore General Plan Errata Sheet
738

EXHIBIT A
739

EXHIBIT A
740

EXHIBIT A
741

EXHIBIT A
742
Livermore Draft General Plan 2045 is available online using the link below Publish Date: February 20, 2026
Draft General Plan 2045 | imaginelivermore2045.org

EXHIBIT B
743
General Plan 2045 – Errata Sheet (July 7, 2026)
This errata describes revisions to General Plan 2045 that will be incorporated into the final General Plan upon adoption. Edits are shown in underline and strikethrough.

General Plan Land Use Map
Las Positas/Contractors Place Area: Remove new Service Commercial (SC) designation and keep existing General Industrial (GI) designation to align with the current uses and facilities and reduce non-conformities.

First Street Transition Area (Southwestern corner): maintain as a dual Medium Density Residential 3 (MDR3)/Service Commercial (SC) designation.

EXHIBIT C
744
22-acre site near 3658 Las Colinas Road: update the MDR-3 floating designation to a floating MDR-2/MDR-3 designation to allow a wider range of residential densities and product types.

Midtown Specific Plan Area: update a portion of the Midtown Specific Plan designation to Service Commercial.

EXHIBIT C
745
305 South Vasco Road: Update the Neighborhood Commercial designation to General Industrial.

Camden Commons/Cole Commons: Update the Neighborhood Mixed Use – High Density (NMH) designation to Medium Density Residential 3 (MDR 3) to reflect the existing townhome development.

Land Use Element
 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) - Clarify FAR identified in the Land Use Element is the maximum allowed, not a build to amount. (There are no changes to the FAR numbers in General Plan 2045).

EXHIBIT C
746
 Midtown Specific Plan Area
The Midtown Specific Plan Area (MSPA) designation applies to the area comprising most of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Southfront Priority Development Area (PDA) in Livermore and incorporates existing development including local shopping districts and the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan. The MSPA designation is intended to create a mixed-use, transit-supportive neighborhood that balances housing, commercial, office, and industrial uses and creates a complete community independent of whether or when a future transit station is developed. Land uses, circulation, development standards, design requirements, infrastructure and service needs, and other specifications for the Midtown Specific Plan Area will be determined through a specific plan. (Current zoning districts shall remain in effect until such time as a midtown specific plan is adopted).
 Policy LU-2.8: Doolan Canyon Open Space Greenbelt. Maintain and protect Doolan Canyon’s visual, environmental, ecological, and habitat values by establishing a permanent open space greenbelt between the natural Cottonwood Creek riparian corridor and the western City boundary. Continue coordination with the City of Dublin to support preservation, management, and any future planning efforts affecting the area.  Policy LU-4.3: Flexible Adaptive and Responsive Development Standards. Allow flexibility in diversity of use types, densities, and development standards within mixed-use districts to encourage innovation, adaptability to market conditions, and responsiveness to community needs.
 Policy LU-7.4: Interference with Agriculture. Prohibit Discourage proposed projects adjacent to agricultural areas that would substantially interfere with existing agricultural production.
 Policy LU-15.8 Midtown Land Use Consistency To provide clarity, ensure a smooth transition, and avoid ambiguity, the zoning districts in effect at the time of adoption shall remain in place until a Midtown Specific Plan is adopted.  Policy LU-17.1: Transitional Area Project Design. Require Ensure future development to is designed projects in context with the surrounding land uses and facilitates a mix of housing types.
 Policy LU-18.1: East of Greenville Possible Conditions for Further Study. Consider and, at the City’s sole discretion, evaluate potential Urban Growth Boundary and land use changes in the East of Greenville Road area under the following conditions. (Nothing in this policy requires the City to initiate or complete a study, or implement the findings

EXHIBIT C
747
of a study; the City retains full discretion to determine if, when, and where any analysis may occur).
• Service and Infrastructure Challenges. If regular monitoring concludes that the City cannot maintain essential services or infrastructure due to operational or financial issues.
• Jobs-Housing Imbalance. If monitoring reveals a mismatch in land uses that prevents the City from:
o Supporting new job-generating or high-revenue businesses, or o Meeting state housing targets (Regional Housing Needs Assessment) without redesignating other areas.
• Strategic Opportunities. If a unique opportunity arises to meet a strategic goal or deliver community benefits that cannot be achieved through existing plans or monitoring.
• Land Use Conflicts. If land outside the Urban Growth Boundary is being misused or poorly managed in ways that conflict with City goals or negatively impact:
o Livermore wine country
o The National Laboratories
o Nearby industrial or business parks
Community Identity Element
 Policy CI-11.2 Glare from Developments. Require developments to minimize obtrusive glare and wasted energy from excessive nighttime lighting and preserve views of the nighttime sky and minimize intrusive lighting impacts on adjacent land uses.  Policy CI-13.10 Legislative Advocacy. Support State legislation that enhances local discretion over design review and, discretionary design decisions, and building code or other regulatory updates to ensure high-quality standards that represent Livermore’s unique identity and allow for architectural flexibility based on site context and community needs. Oppose State legislation that reduces local authority to preserve high-quality urban design, and architecture, and context sensitive development.  Policy CI-15.3: Street Corridors. Identify, map, design, and implement major street corridors throughout the city. Each major street corridor shall should include highquality urban design features like generously landscaped medians and backing lots, quality and consistent backing lot walls and fences, large shade tree species, separated

EXHIBIT C
748
sidewalks, and consistent and artistic public facilities like light poles, pedestrian benches, and litter bins.

Mobility Element
 Figure on page 5-7 Graph showing the different travel modes of Livermore residents.

Updated Figure. (Will be updated periodically as data is collected and minor adjustment made).
 Policy MO-1.5 Complete Streets Outreach Involve residents, merchants, and other stakeholders early in the process of evaluating the design and implementation of Complete Streets plans. Use timely and cost-effective outreach and engagement methods that are culturally sensitive and encourage broad representation.  Goal MO-4: Make transit a more convenient and viable option by supporting frequent, reliable, cost-efficient, and connected service.
 Policy MO-5.7: Level of Service Improvements. Improve intersections that are allowed to exceed the City’s established Level of Service, as established in the City’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, to the extent feasible to improve design, minimize impacts, increase safety for all users, and maintain efficient circulation support the community character.
 Policy MO-6.3 Local Transportation Analysis Guideline. Develop a Local Transportation Analysis Guideline to evaluate the transportation impacts from new development, including to vehicular, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian modes, and identify acceptable mitigation measures. The guideline should include both Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Level of Service, Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS), Pedestrian Level of Stress (PLS) analysis, as well as a Vehicle Miles Traveled reduction toolbox.
 Policy MO-8.4: Bicycle Parking. Require on- and off-street bicycle parking facilities near places of work, residential, commerce, education, recreation, and other destinations.

Ensure safety and convenience of the bicycle parking accommodating a range of bicycle types.
 Policy MO-11.4: Level 3 Electric Vehicle Chargers. Require all new and significantly remodeled gas stations to include a Level 3 electric vehicle charger at a minimum. Integrate EV charging stations into new and significantly remodeled commercial developments, and other strategic locations, to improve public accessibility and support expanded EV use.
 Policy MO-12.2 Interstate 580 High-Occupancy Vehicle/Toll Lanes. Preserve Evaluate right-of-way preservation needs adjacent to Interstate 580 to support a flexible

EXHIBIT C
749
range of future regional transportation improvements, which may include allow widening for High-Occupancy Vehicle/Toll lanes, auxiliary lanes, and Valley Link, and other multimodal or emerging mobility options that enhance regional connectivity, improve travel reliability, and expand access to convenient transportation choices.

Infrastructure
 Policy INF-1.8 Infrastructure Improvement Decision Process Deliver a consistent and transparent decision-making process for infrastructure improvement prioritization. Use guiding principles, such as resilience, environmental sustainability, equity, safety, cost effectiveness, and fiscal responsibility to guide the prioritization of infrastructure improvements.

Community Services Element
 Policy CS-3.3: Healthy Food Access. Remove any regulatory barriers that would discourage healthy food retailers from locating in areas with low access to healthy food.

Work with transit providers to improve transit access to healthy food retailers.

Safety Element
 Policy S-2.4: Two Evacuation Routes. Require that new major residential and nonresidential developments have access to at least two points of ingress and egress in high severity zones.
 Policy S-6.3: New Construction on Faults. Prohibit Avoid new structures proposed for human occupancy across the trace of any active or potentially active fault. The Greenville Fault and Las Positas Fault shall be assumed active, and the Livermore Fault shall be assumed potentially active, unless and until demonstrably shown otherwise by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) or the California Geological Survey (CGS) or similar credible authority.
 Policy S-6.5: Geotechnical Investigations for Critical Facilities. Require a site-specific geotechnical investigation for all new municipal and critical facilities in the city (schools, hospitals, fire stations, and police stations) so that these facilities are constructed in a manner that mitigates site-specific geotechnical challenges and minimizes the risk to the public from seismic hazards.
 Policy S-6.6: Utility Lines Across Faults. Require Coordinate with utility line operators to ensure that major utility lines be are accessible for rapid repair, include safety features such as automatic shutoff valves, switches and expansion joints, and cross faults at right angles or as close to a right angle as physically feasible. Require utility line operators to provide additional equipment to ensure minimal adverse impact on adjacent and

EXHIBIT C
750
surrounding areas and to facilitate restoration of service in the event of fault displacement.
 Policy S-11.1: Residual Repositories. Prohibit Residual repositories are not appropriate in city limits. This includes facilities used for the long-term storage or disposal of residual waste materials such as industrial byproducts, contaminated soils, or treated sludge.

Implementation Chapter
Monitoring Progress and Measuring Success
 To ensure the General Plan remains a living, responsive document, the City will use a monitoring and tracking framework that includes Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

These indicators will help evaluate the effectiveness of policies and City actions over time and guide adjustments as needed. Monitoring will focus on:
 Housing Production and Affordability: Checking progress toward meeting Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) targets and providing housing across income levels.
 Jobs-Housing Balance and Match: Tracking the ratio of jobs to housing and the alignment between local wages and housing costs.
 Economic Vitality: Monitoring vacancy rates, business growth, and fiscal health indicators such as revenue generation and infrastructure maintenance costs.  Infrastructure and Public Services: Ensuring that growth is matched by adequate capacity in transportation, utilities, parks, schools, and emergency services.  Environmental Sustainability: Measuring greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, waste diversion, and renewable energy adoption.  Multimodal Transportation and Safety: Tracking performance across all travel modes, including transit ridership, bicycle and pedestrian activity, roadway operations, and accessibility. Monitoring traffic safety data such as collision rates, severity, and locations for all users to support safer street design and implementation of Vision Zero–type strategies.
 Quality of Life: Evaluating access to neighborhood amenities, open space, cultural resources, and community services
 Action MO-A-8.5: Bicycle Parking Standards. Update the Development Code (or Standard Details) to establish bicycle parking standards that require the use of rack types

EXHIBIT C
751
capable of accommodating a variety of bicycle styles and sizes, and that are designed to allow secure attachment of the bicycle frame.

EXHIBIT C
752
1 ORDINANCE NO. ___

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 26-001

AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recommendation. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 7, 2026 to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment (“Project”) and recommended that the City Council approve the proposed Zoning Map Amendment in Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Exhibit A includes attachments showing the proposed change areas to the Zoning Map.

Section 2. Public Hearing. Prior to taking action on the Zoning Map Amendment, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the City of Livermore reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment and took testimony; and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Zoning Map Amendment (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Ordinance by reference.

Section 3. Environmental. The City Council has adopted Resolution No. ____ finding that the Final EIR for the General Plan 2045 and Zoning Map Amendment has been completed in compliance with the intent and requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s local CEQA requirements and has considered the information contained in the Final EIR and the record prior to taking any action on the Project, other related Project actions, or any of the alternatives. The City Council certified the Final EIR and approved and adopted the Findings, Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations Regarding the Environmental Impact Report.

Section 4. Zoning Map Amendment. The City Council has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them herein, and, based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, hereby approves Zoning Map Amendment 26- 001 amending the Zoning District Map of the City of Livermore as shown in the attached Exhibit B.

Section 5. Publication. This Ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Livermore within 15 days after its adoption and shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its adoption.
753
2 ORDINANCE NO. ___
Section 6. Filing. Planning Manager is directed to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk.

Section 7. Documents. The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based on can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, California.

Section 8. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any remaining parts.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Livermore held on July 27, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The Ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council held on __________, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________

MAYOR, CITY OF LIVERMORE
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou Helena Graves Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-26
Exhibit B – Zoning District Map
754

EXHIBIT A
755

EXHIBIT A
756

EXHIBIT A
757
ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 ma
5 3'26

3'
 3'&

3'
3'
3'
3',
$,56(
38'
56 38'

3'5
38'
38'
56 38'

38'


38'


38'


3'5
38'


$,56(
38'

38'

38'$

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'
38'$ 38'
38'$

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'
38'$
3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'

38'

38'

3'&

5/
(
38'
5*
3'5
38'
38'
3'5
38'
38'

3',
5*
38'


38'
55 38'
3'5
38'
38'
38'


38'

38'


38'

$
5*
3'


38'$

38'


38'
38'

5*
3'
38'$

38'$

,163
3'
38'
38'$
38'


38'$
38'

3'&

38'

3'&

3'5

38'$

3'&

38'$

38'
38'


38'
38'
38'$

5*
38'

38'
3'5
55
38'$
3'&


3'&

38'

3'&

3'&

38'


3',
3'
38'
38'
5*
38'


38'

38'
38'

38'


38'

56 3'&

38'


3'


38'

38'

38'

5*

3'5
38'



38'
38'

3'&


3'5

3'&

38'

0)5
5*
(
5*
38'

3'5
5*
3'5

3',


38'
3'5

3'5

38'

3'5

 5*
38'

38'

38'

5*
38'

56 5*

38'
38'

38'
38' 
 38'



38'
3'5

38'


3'5
38'

3'5


38'
5*

38'


38'


3'&

55

3UH=RQHG

38'
38'

3'5
3'5
 38'

3'&

3'5


38'


38'

3'5

38'


5*

38'


38'
3'
 3'5 
 38'



38'


38'
5* 

3'5


3'5


38'



3'5

3'5


5*

38'


5*

3'&

38'


38' 
 38'




38'



3'

38'


3'&


38'


38'

5*

38'

3'5
5*
5*

38'


38'



3'5


38'



38'



38'

38'

38'



3'5

 38' 


3'

3'&


38'

38'



3'&


38'



38'

5*
,
5/
5/
56 5/
(
(
'63
26$
56 71
&6
(
5/
56 (
56 $,523
(
(
71
26$
26$
56 5/
(
&6
5/
(
,
$,56(
56 (
(
26)
(
(
&6
56 ,
(
71
5/
(
56 $,56(
5/
56 (
56 5/
(
71
56 56
(
(
(
(
5/
(
56 ,
5/
(
26$
,
(
&6
56 ,
56 ,
(
(
(
5/
&1%
56 &1% &2
(
(
5/
5/
(
3'&

(
56 (
56 108
26)
,
26)
&6
26)
(
26)
56 0)5
&+6
(
&1%
(
712
&+6
&+6
(
(
26$
26$
56 108 0)5
56 26)
5/
&1%
6/9$*
0)5
&1%
(
5/
26$
&+6
71
56 56
&6
(
,

6/9
$*
56 56
56 &2

0)5
&2

56 &6

0)5
(
56 &3

&2
712
&2
56 &3
0)5

&3
&6
71

71
&3
56 71
&2

&3
 &3

&2
 &3

71
3'
3'
3'(&6326
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'6/963
38'$ 
3'
6/963
3'
38'


38'


38'

3'55
3'
5/
3',

3'
5/
56 56
3'
56 56
38'

38'

38'

38'

 3'5 
3'

38'

3' 3'
5/
5/
3'6/963
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

26)
38'


3'
3'
3'
56 5/
,
,
,
,
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'

3UH=RQHG

$,523

3UH=RQHG

3UH
=RQHG

3UH=RQHG

38'


3'
3'
38'
3'

3'
6/963

3'

3'5

38' 


3'

38'

(
3'5

&6
3'5


3'5
  0)5
38'
&6
71
56 3'
&6
3'
3'
,163
,163
,163
26)

&+6
3'&

(
3'5
3UH
=RQHG
&2
38' 

3'5

3'
3'5
26)
3',
3',
‰^] ‰^]
‰^]
]^‰
‰^]

]^‰
]^‰
‰^]
]
^‰
'$/721$9
1367
5,1&21$9
1 / 67
:,67(5,$:<
-81&7,21$9
2/,9,1$$9
&2//(*($9
683(5,25 '5
( 58%< +,// '5
5$,/52$' $9
6&(1,&$9
%/8(%(// '5
&$7$/,1$ '5
-(16(1 67
$552<25'
$0(667
:58%<+,// '5
085'(// /1
085'(///1
%52$'0225 67
3,1(67
2/,9,1$$9
+$*(0$11 '5
0$'(,5$:<
7+,5'67
6(&21'67
9$1&289(5 :<
1$7,21$/'5
+,//&5(67$9
(/ &$0,1,72
/(;,1*721:<
*$//2:$< 67
(1&,12 '5
&+(6718767
$552<25'
6&(1,&$9
7285,*$ '5
:$// 67
$5/(1( :< '$3+1( '5
(/ &+$552 5'
&(175$/$9
&+$5/277( :<
*$5$9(17$ 5$1&+ 5' +(50$1$9
0,1(65'
6/ 67
6367
/$8*+/,15'
0$3/(67
6/ 67
6(&21'67
&+(6718767
&2//,(5&$1<21 5'
1257+)5217 5'
6287+)5217 5'
%5,6$67
$/'(1/1
75$148,/,7< &,
&+$5/277( :<
58%<+,//%/
%86&+5'
1 0,1(6 5'
1257+)5217
5'
2/'),567 67
&2167,787,21 '5
*$7(:$<$9
6+( $ &(17(5 '5
6287+)5217 5'
52%(57621 3$5. 5'
1 0,1(6 5'
:(7025(5'
,1'(3(1'(1&( '5
+2/0(667
3$77(5621 3$66 5'
3$77(56213$665'
$/7$02173$66 5'
1 /,9(5025( $9
1/,9(5025( $9
(9$//(&,7265'
9,1(<$5'$9
9,1(<$5'$9
)$//21 5'
1257+)52175'
$,5:$<%/
6/,9(5025( $9
(/&+$5525'
69$6&25' 69$6&2 5'
32572/$$9
32572/$$9
32572/$$9
*5((19,//(5' *5((19,//( 5'
),56767
),56767
635,1*72:1%/
1 *5((19,//( 5'
( $,5:$< %/
,6$%(/ $9
,6$%(/$9 ,6$%(/ $9
,6$%(/$9
19$6&25'
:-$&. /21'21 %/
:-$&./21'21%/
0,1(65'
0,1(65'
($67$9 ($67$9
*5((19,//(5'
10855,(7$%/
.,77< +$:. 5'
&21&$1121%/ &21&$1121%/
&21&$1121 %/
&2//,(5 &$1<215'
)2857+67
,10$167
1257+ &$1<216 3:
6667
7(6/$5' 7(6/$5'
(-$&./21'21%/
0$5,1$$9
0855,(7$
%/
/$6 326,7$6 5'
/$6 326,7$6 5'
/$6326,7$65'
/$6326,7$65'
67$1/(<%/
9$//(&,726
5'
$552<25'
7(6/$5'
( 9,1(<$5'$9
6721(5,'*('5
'22/$1 5'
'22/$1 5'
&5$1(5
5'
, '*(
(67$1/(<%/
(67$1/(<%/
1 9$6&2 5'
&52$.5'
'8%/,1 %/
:(17(67
38'

  38' 6XEDUHD
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'$ 
3'
6/963
38'

38'

38'

38'


3'
6/963
   
0LOHV
š
&LW\RI/LYHUPRUH=RQLQJ0DS
0L[HG8VH
1HLJKERUKRRG0L[HG8VH
108
,VDEHO1HLJKERUKRRG6SHFLILF3ODQ
,163
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG2SHQ
712

,QGXVWULDO
5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQW
,
/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

3'38'38'$3'$*3'&3',3'263'53'(&635&3'(&63+5&3'(&63263'6/963 3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW3ODQQHG8QLW'HYHORSPHQW$PHQGPHQW3HUPLW3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW$JULFXOWXUDO3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW&RPPHUFLDO3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW,QGXVWULDO3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW2SHQ6SDFH3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW5HVLGHQWLDO3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW(O&KDUUR6SHFLILF3ODQ5HJLRQDO&RPPHUFLDO3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW(O&KDUUR6SHFLILF3ODQ+LJKZD\5HJLRQDO&RPPHUFLDO3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW(O&KDUUR6SHFLILF3ODQ2SHQ6SDFH3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW6RXWK/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\6SHFLILF3ODQ $LUSRUW
$LUSRUW6HUYLFH
$,56(
$LUSRUW2SHUDWLRQV
$,523

0LVFHOODQHRXV2WKHU
ma
5 7UDQVIHUDEOH'HYHORSPHQW&UHGLWV
7'&
5HFHLYHU6LWH8UEDQ*URZWK%RXQGDU\&LW\/LPLWV
   
0LOHV
2WKHU
(GXFDWLRQDQG,QVWLWXWLRQV
(
6RXWK/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\$JULFXOWXUDO
6/9$*
2SHQ6SDFH$JULFXOWXUDO
26$
2SHQ6SDFH)ORRG3ODLQ
26)
2SHQ6SDFH5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO
265
2SHQ6SDFH
26 ,3ODQ/LQHVWKDW5HVHUYHV5LJKWRI:D\IRU)XWXUH,([SDQVLRQ 5HVLGHQWLDO
/RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5
55VTIWPLQLPXPORWVL]H55VTIWPLQLPXPORWVL]H55VTIWPLQLPXPORWVL]H5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO 55 5*5*5*5*6XEXUEDQ5HVLGHQWLDO
56 8SGDWHGRQ0DUFK
&RPPHUFLDO
'RZQWRZQ6SHFLILF3ODQ
'63
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
3URIHVVLRQDO2IILFH
&3
&RPPHUFLDO2IILFH
&2
+LJKZD\&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&+6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

Existing

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A
758
3'26

3'
 3'&

3'
3'
3'
3',
$,56(
38'
56 38'

3'5
38'
38'
56 38'

38'


38'


38'


3'5
38'


$,56(
38'

38'

38'$

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'
38'$ 38'
38'$

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'
38'$
3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'

38'

38'

3'&

5/
(
38'
5*
3'5
38'
38'
3'5
38'
38'

3',
5*
38'
55 38'
3'5
38'
38'
38'


38'

38'


38'

$
5*
3' 3'5


38'$

38'


38'
38'

5*
3'
38'$

38'$

,163
3'
38'
38'$
38'


38'$
38'

3'&

38'

3'&

3'5

38'$

3'&

38'$

38'
38'


38'
38'
38'$

5*
38'

38'
3'5
55
38'$
3'&


3'&

38'

3'&

3'&

38'


3',
3'
38'
38'
5*
38'


38'

38'
38'

38'


38'

56 3'&

38'


3'


38'

38'

38'

5*

3'5
38'



38'
38'

3'&


3'5

3'&

38'

5*
(
5*
38'

3'5
5*
3'5

3',


38'
3'5

3'5

38'

3'5

 5*
38'

38'

38'

5*
38'

56 5*

38'
38'

38'
38' 
 38'



38'
3'5

38'


3'5
38'

3'5


38'
5*

38'


38'


3'&

55

3UH=RQHG

38'
38'

3'5
3'5
3'5


38'


38'

3'5

38'


5*

38'


38'
3'
 3'5 
 38'



38'


38'
5* 

3'5


3'5


38'



3'5

3'5


5*

38'


5*

3'&

38'


38' 
 38'




38'



3'

38'


3'&


38'


38'

5*

38'

3'5
5*
5*

38'


38'



3'5


38'



38'



38'

38'

38'



3'5

 38' 


3'

3'&


3'

38'



3'&


38'



38'

5*
,
5/
5/
56 5/
(
(
'63
26$
56 71
(
5/
56 (
56 $,523
(
(
71
26$
56 5/
(
5/
(
,
$,56(
56 (
(
26)
(
(
56 ,
(
71
5/
(
56 $,56(
5/
56 (
56 5/
(
71
56 56
(
(
(
(
5/
(
56 ,
5/
(
26$
,
(
&6
56 ,
56 ,
(
(
(
5/
&1%
56 &1% &2
(
(
5/
5/
(
3'&

(
56 56
108
26)
,
26)
&6
26)
(
26)
56 0)5
&+6
(
&1%
(
712
&+6
&+6
(
(
26$
26$
56 108 0)5
56 26)
5/
&1%
6/9$*
0)5
&1%
(
5/
26$
&+6
71
56 56
&6
(
,
56 56
56 &2

0)5
&2

56 &6

0)5
(
56 &3

&2
712
&2
56 &3
0)5

&3
&6
71

71
&3
56 71
&2

&3
 &3

&2
 &3

71
3'
3'
3'(&6326
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'$ 
3'
6/963
3'
38'


38'


38'

3'55
3'
5/
3',

3'
5/
56 56
3'
56 56
38'

38'

 3'5 
3'

38'

3' 3'
5/
5/
3'6/963
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

26)
38'


3'
3'
3'
56 5/
,
,
,
,
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'

3UH=RQHG

$,523

3UH=RQHG

3UH
=RQHG

3UH=RQHG

38'


3'
3'
38'
3'

3'
6/963

3'

3'5

38' 


3'

38'

(
3'5

3'5


3'5
  0)5
38'
3'5
&6
71
56 3'
&6
3'
3'
,163
,163
,163
26)

&+6
3'&

(
3'5
3UH
=RQHG
&2
38' 

26)
3',
3',
&1%
5/
5/
71
71
0)5
5*
3'
3'
0)5
3'
&6
'$/721$9
%(/
520$5'
3$77(56213$665'
,1'(3(1'(1&('5
5,1&21$9
5$<021'5'
'(/
9$//(3:
6<&$025(5'
9$//(&,7265'
:,67(5,$ :<
-81&7,21$9
2/,9,1$$9
7$66$-$5$5'
/$6 &2/,1$6 5'
&2//(*($9
683(5,25 '5
/255$,1(5'
+$33< 9$//(< 5'
1257+)5217 5'
3,0/,&2'5
0$<6&+22/5'
&$552//5'
%/$&.$9
7(6/$ 5'
*5((19,//(5'
+2/0(667
635,1*72:1%/ $9,$12 :<
),11,$1 :<
6$17$ 5,7$ 5'
$,5:$<%/
5+((0'5
$/,6$/67
5$,/52$'$9
&$7$/,1$ '5
-(16(1 67
9,&725,$/1
$552<25'
$0(667
',$%/2
9,(:67
085'(// /1
6$17$5,7$5'
%52$'022567
(126
:<
.2//167
+$*(0$11 '5

0$'(,5$:<
7+,5'67
6(&21'
67 9$1&289(5:<
1$7,21$/'5
&('$5 02817$,1 5'
+,//&5(67$9
($67$9
2/' ),567 67
/(;,1*721 :<
*$//2:$<67
(1&,12'5
6<&$025( &5((. :<
0$,167
'<(5
5'
.$03 '5
58%< +,// '5
7285,*$'5
:$// 67
$5/(1(:<
),56767
'$3+1( '5
%/8(%(// '5
3,0/,&2'5
&(175$/ $9
9,1(<$5'$9
.,77< +$:. 5'
0,1(65'
&+$5/277(:<
3,1(67
*$5$9(17$ 5$1&+ 5'
/$6 326,7$6 %/
367
0$3/(67
/$8*+/,15'
6&(1,&$9
'<(55'
&2//,(5&$1<215'
)2857+67
,10$167
',$%/2
9,(:'5
0855,(7$ %/
-81,3(52 67
/ 67
1257+ &$1<216 3:
(/ &+$552 5'
6(&21'67
&+(6718767
02+5$9
6 67
1(9$'$ 67
6287+)52175'
%5,6$
67 -$&./21'21%/
67$1/(<
67 '8%/,1 %/
(/&$0,1,72
$/'(1/1 0$5,1$$9
9$//(< $9
&5266 5'
(/&+$5525'
&21&$1121%/
/$6326,7$65'
58%<
+,//%/
%(51$/ $9
),56767
58%< +,// '5
%86&+ 5'
*2(&.(1 5'
5(8665'
7(6/$5'
526(:22' '5
&5$1( 5,'*( 5'
9,1(<$5'$9
6721(5,'*( '5
'22/$15'
32572/$$9
*$7(:$<$9
6287+)5217 5'
67$1/(<%/
52%(57621 3$5. 5'
'$*1,125'
&52$.5'
/,9(5025( $9
$/7$0217 3$66 5'
9$6&25'
0,1(6 5'
.277,1*(5'5
:(7025(5'
,1'(3(1'(1&(
'5
)/<115'
9$6&25'
:(17(67
&2167,787,21'5
+$57)25'$9
$LUSRUW
$LUSRUW6HUYLFH
$,56(
$LUSRUW2SHUDWLRQV
$,523

&RPPHUFLDO
'RZQWRZQ6SHFLILF3ODQ
'63
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
3URIHVVLRQDO2IILFH
&3
&RPPHUFLDO2IILFH
&2
+LJKZD\&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&+6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQW
,

/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG8VH
1HLJKERUKRRG0L[HG8VH
108
,VDEHO1HLJKERUKRRG63
,163
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG2SHQ
712

2WKHU
(GXFDWLRQDQG,QVWLWXWLRQV
(
2SHQ6SDFH
26 6RXWK/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\$JULFXOWXUDO
6/9$*

3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
5HVLGHQWLDO
5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO
55 /RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ5HVLGHQWLDO
56 6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW\%RXQGDULHV
/LYHUPRUH&LW\/LPLWV6SKHUHRI,QIOXHQFH8UEDQ*URZWK%RXQGDU\ š
$9,$12
:<
,$%/2
(:'5
   
0LOHV
3'6/963
3'6/963
38'

3'6/963
$LUSRUW
$LUSRUW6HUYLFH
$,56(
$LUSRUW2SHUDWLRQV
$,523

&RPPHUFLDO
'RZQWRZQ6SHFLILF3ODQ
'63
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
3URIHVVLRQDO2IILFH
&3
&RPPHUFLDO2IILFH
&2
+LJKZD\&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&+6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG8VH
1HLJKERUKRRG0L[HG8VH
108
,VDEHO1HLJKERUKRRG63
,163
7UDQVHFW =RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW =RQH71HLJKERUKRRG2SHQ
712

6RXWK/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\$JULFXOWXUDO
6/9$*

3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
5HVLGHQWLDO
5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO
55 /RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ5HVLGHQWLDO
56 6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW %R QGDULHV
8SGDWHGRQ-XQH 8SGDWHGRQ-XQH 9th, 2026
&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQW
,

2WKHU
(GXFDWLRQDQG,QVWLWXWLRQV
(
2SHQ6SDFH
26 &LW\ %RXQGDULHV
/LYHUPRUH&LW\/LPLWV6SKHUHRI,QIOXHQFH8UEDQ*URZWK%RXQGDU\ +,// '5
,567 ) 67 67 ,567 )
1(<$5
3'6/963
3'6/963
38'

3'6/963
&LW\RI/LYHUPRUH=RQLQJ0DS
Proposed

EXHIBIT BEXHIBIT A
759













DALTON AV

PATTERSON PASS RD
R

RINCON AV IN

RAYMOND RD AYM

VALLECITOS RD

WISTERIA WY

JUNCTION AV U

OLIVINA AV OL

SUNFLOWER CT

LAS COLINAS RD

COLLEGE AV L

SUPERIOR DR

LORRAINE RD LORRAINE RD

FLYNN RD

NORTHFRONT RD

PIMLICO DR

BMAY SCHOOL RD EL ROMA RD

REUSS RD

BLACK AV B

CARROLL RD

GREENVILLE RD GREENVILLE RD

TESLA RD

HOLMES ST L

SPRINGTOWN BL

FINNIAN WY AIRWAY BL A

RHEEM DR

RAILROAD AV IL D OA ILR V AD

CATALINA DR L

JENSEN ST

ARROYO RD ARR

AMES ST
DIABLO
VIEW S

MURDELL LN

SANTA RITA RD SANT

BROADMOOR ST

ENOS WY

KOLLN ST KOL

HAGEMANN DR HAGE DMANN E

MADEIRA WY

THIRD ST TH D

SECOND ST CON

VANCOUVER WY

NATIONAL DR

HILLCREST AV C H

EAST AV
OLD

FIRST ST

LEXINGTON WY

GALLOWAY
ST

ENCINO DR

HILLCREST AV

MAIN ST
DYER
RD

KAMP DR
FIRST
ST

RUBY HILL DR

PLEASANTON AV LEA

TOURIGA DR

WALL ST

ARLENE WY

FIRST ST

DAPHNE DR D

HOPYARD
RD

MINES RD

BLUEBELL DR BLU

PIMLICO DR M

GREENWOOD RD

CENTRAL AV T C

VINEYARD AV V YA A

KITTY HAWK RD

CHARLOTTE WY

PINE ST

GARAVENTA RANCH RD

DUBLIN BL

HERMAN AV E A

LAS POSITAS BL

CROSS RD
P ST

MAPLE ST

LAUGHLIN RD LA GUHLIN

SCENIC AV

COLLIER CANYON RD

FOURTH ST FO
INMAN
ST

PETERS AV TE

VALLEY AV ALLEY

MURRIETA BL
L ST

NORTH CANYONS PW

EL CHARRO RD

SECOND ST S

CHESTNUT ST ES

OLD BERNAL AV

MOHR AV
S
ST

NEVADA ST

SOUTHFRONT RD TH

ST MARYS ST MA ST ST

BRISA ST RIS

JACK LONDON BL

STANLEY
ST

EL CAMINITO

ALDEN LN A MARINA AV

DEL VALLE PW AL E

DIVISION ST

EL CHARRO RD H RRO EL CHARRO RD EL CHARRO R EL CHARRO RD

CONCANNON BL O

LAS POSITAS RD

OLD SANTA RITA RD
RUBY

HILL BL H

BERNAL AV

DYER RD

FIRST ST
RUBY

HILL DR H

BUSCH RD

GOECKEN RD

TESLA RD

OWENS DR

ROSEWOOD DR

COMSTOCK COMSTOCK O
RD

VINEYARD AV

STONERIDGE DR

DOOLAN RD

PORTOLA AV TOLA AV POR

GATEWAY AV G

SOUTHFRONT RD

STANLEY BL STANLEY BL

ROBERTSON PARK RD

CROAK RD

LIVERMORE AV R IV L

MINES RD M

KOTTINGER DR NG

WETMORE RD WETMORE RD

INDEPENDENCE DR ND

DAGNINO RD

VASCO RD

VASCO RD

ALTAMONT PASS RD

ANDREWS DR

WENTE ST WENTE ST

CONSTITUTION DR T

CASE AV

HARTFORD AV
&RPPHUFLDO
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG8VH
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71

2WKHU
2SHQ6SDFH
26 3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3'HWF

5HVLGHQWLDO
/RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW\%RXQGDULHV
Urban Growth BoundarySphere of InfluenceLivermore City Limits 8SGDWHGRQ-XQHQG
RD
&RPPHUFLDO
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG 8VH
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71

2WKHU
2SHQ6SDFH
26 3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3'HWF

5HVLGHQWLDO
/RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW\%RXQGDULHV
Urban Growth BoundarySphere of InfluenceLivermore City Limits 8SGDWHGRQ-XQHQG
šTASSAJARA RD
AVIANO
WY
O
ST
DIABLO

VIEW DR VIE
   
0LOHV
Area GP2045 Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning1 RC RS CNB
2 LDR3 E RL3 MDR1 E RL4 MDR3 CS T4N5 MDR3 CS T4N6 HDR 1 I-3 MFR7 MDR2 RL RG-168 HLC/MDR2-3/HDR1 OS-A PD9 SC I-3 CS10 WCC OS PD 11 MDR4 PUD 117-91 MFR12 HDR1/GI/MIC/OSP CS PD13 GI PDC-07-005 I-3 DR
VArea GP2045 Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
1 RC RS CNB2 LDR3 E RL3 MDR1 E RL4 MDR3 CS T4N5 MDR3 CS T4N6 HDR 1 I-3 MFR7 MDR2 RL RG-168 HLC/MDR2-3/HDR1 OS-A PD9 SC I-3 CS10 WCC OS PD11 MDR4 PUD 117-91 MFR12 HDR1/GI/MIC/OSP CS PD13 GI PDC-07-005 I-3 Proposed Change Areas

EXHIBIT CEXHIBIT A
760
3'26

3'
 3'&

3'
3'
3'
3',
$,56(
38'
56 38'

3'5
38'
38'
56 38'

38'


38'


38'


3'5
38'


$,56(
38'

38'

38'$

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'
38'$ 38'
38'$

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'
38'$
3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'

38'

38'

3'&

5/
(
38'
5*
3'5
38'
38'
3'5
38'
38'

3',
5*
38'
55 38'
3'5
38'
38'
38'


38'

38'


38'

$
5*
3' 3'5


38'$

38'


38'
38'

5*
3'
38'$

38'$

,163
3'
38'
38'$
38'


38'$
38'

3'&

38'

3'&

3'5

38'$

3'&

38'$

38'
38'


38'
38'
38'$

5*
38'

38'
3'5
55
38'$
3'&


3'&

38'

3'&

3'&

38'


3',
3'
38'
38'
5*
38'


38'

38'
38'

38'


38'

56 3'&

38'


3'


38'

38'

38'

5*

3'5
38'



38'
38'

3'&


3'5

3'&

38'

5*
(
5*
38'

3'5
5*
3'5

3',


38'
3'5

3'5

38'

3'5

 5*
38'

38'

38'

5*
38'

56 5*

38'
38'

38'
38' 
 38'



38'
3'5

38'


3'5
38'

3'5


38'
5*

38'


38'


3'&

55

3UH=RQHG

38'
38'

3'5
3'5
3'5


38'


38'

3'5

38'


5*

38'


38'
3'
 3'5 
 38'



38'


38'
5* 

3'5


3'5


38'



3'5

3'5


5*

38'


5*

3'&

38'


38' 
 38'




38'



3'

38'


3'&


38'


38'

5*

38'

3'5
5*
5*

38'


38'



3'5


38'



38'



38'

38'

38'



3'5

 38' 


3'

3'&


3'

38'



3'&


38'



38'

5*
,
5/
5/
56 5/
(
(
'63
26$
56 71
(
5/
56 (
56 $,523
(
(
71
26$
56 5/
(
5/
(
,
$,56(
56 (
(
26)
(
(
56 ,
(
71
5/
(
56 $,56(
5/
56 (
56 5/
(
71
56 56
(
(
(
(
5/
(
56 ,
5/
(
26$
,
(
&6
56 ,
56 ,
(
(
(
5/
&1%
56 &1% &2
(
(
5/
5/
(
3'&

(
56 56
108
26)
,
26)
&6
26)
(
26)
56 0)5
&+6
(
&1%
(
712
&+6
&+6
(
(
26$
26$
56 108 0)5
56 26)
5/
&1%
6/9$*
0)5
&1%
(
5/
26$
&+6
71
56 56
&6
(
,
56 56
56 &2

0)5
&2

56 &6

0)5
(
56 &3

&2
712
&2
56 &3
0)5

&3
&6
71

71
&3
56 71
&2

&3
 &3

&2
 &3

71
3'
3'
3'(&6326
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'6/963
6XEDUHD
38'

38'$ 
3'
6/963
3'
38'


38'


38'

3'55
3'
5/
3',

3'
5/
56 56
3'
56 56
38'

38'

 3'5 
3'

38'

3' 3'
5/
5/
3'6/963
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

26)
38'


3'
3'
3'
56 5/
,
,
,
,
3'6/963
6XEDUHD

3UH=RQHG

3'

3UH=RQHG

$,523

3UH=RQHG

3UH
=RQHG

3UH=RQHG

38'


3'
3'
38'
3'

3'
6/963

3'

3'5

38' 


3'

38'

(
3'5

3'5


3'5
  0)5
38'
3'5
&6
71
56 3'
&6
3'
3'
,163
,163
,163
26)

&+6
3'&

(
3'5
3UH
=RQHG
&2
38' 

26)
3',
3',
&1%
5/
5/
71
71
0)5
5*
3'
3'
0)5
3'
&6
'$/721$9
%(/
520$5'
3$77(56213$665'
,1'(3(1'(1&('5
5,1&21$9
5$<021'5'
'(/
9$//(3:
6<&$025(5'
9$//(&,7265'
:,67(5,$ :<
-81&7,21$9
2/,9,1$$9
7$66$-$5$5'
/$6 &2/,1$6 5'
&2//(*($9
683(5,25 '5
/255$,1(5'
+$33< 9$//(< 5'
1257+)5217 5'
3,0/,&2'5
0$<6&+22/5'
&$552//5'
%/$&.$9
7(6/$ 5'
*5((19,//(5'
+2/0(667
635,1*72:1%/ $9,$12 :<
),11,$1 :<
6$17$ 5,7$ 5'
$,5:$<%/
5+((0'5
$/,6$/67
5$,/52$'$9
&$7$/,1$ '5
-(16(1 67
9,&725,$/1
$552<25'
$0(667
',$%/2
9,(:67
085'(// /1
6$17$5,7$5'
%52$'022567
(126
:<
.2//167
+$*(0$11 '5

0$'(,5$:<
7+,5'67
6(&21'
67 9$1&289(5:<
1$7,21$/'5
&('$5 02817$,1 5'
+,//&5(67$9
($67$9
2/' ),567 67
/(;,1*721 :<
*$//2:$<67
(1&,12'5
6<&$025( &5((. :<
0$,167
'<(5
5'
.$03 '5
58%< +,// '5
7285,*$'5
:$// 67
$5/(1(:<
),56767
'$3+1( '5
%/8(%(// '5
3,0/,&2'5
&(175$/ $9
9,1(<$5'$9
.,77< +$:. 5'
0,1(65'
&+$5/277(:<
3,1(67
*$5$9(17$ 5$1&+ 5'
/$6 326,7$6 %/
367
0$3/(67
/$8*+/,15'
6&(1,&$9
'<(55'
&2//,(5&$1<215'
)2857+67
,10$167
',$%/2
9,(:'5
0855,(7$ %/
-81,3(52 67
/ 67
1257+ &$1<216 3:
(/ &+$552 5'
6(&21'67
&+(6718767
02+5$9
6 67
1(9$'$ 67
6287+)52175'
%5,6$
67 -$&./21'21%/
67$1/(<
67 '8%/,1 %/
(/&$0,1,72
$/'(1/1 0$5,1$$9
9$//(< $9
&5266 5'
(/&+$5525'
&21&$1121%/
/$6326,7$65'
58%<
+,//%/
%(51$/ $9
),56767
58%< +,// '5
%86&+ 5'
*2(&.(1 5'
5(8665'
7(6/$5'
526(:22' '5
&5$1( 5,'*( 5'
9,1(<$5'$9
6721(5,'*( '5
'22/$15'
32572/$$9
*$7(:$<$9
6287+)5217 5'
67$1/(<%/
52%(57621 3$5. 5'
'$*1,125'
&52$.5'
/,9(5025( $9
$/7$0217 3$66 5'
9$6&25'
0,1(6 5'
.277,1*(5'5
:(7025(5'
,1'(3(1'(1&(
'5
)/<115'
9$6&25'
:(17(67
&2167,787,21'5
+$57)25'$9
$LUSRUW
$LUSRUW6HUYLFH
$,56(
$LUSRUW2SHUDWLRQV
$,523

&RPPHUFLDO
'RZQWRZQ6SHFLILF3ODQ
'63
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
3URIHVVLRQDO2IILFH
&3
&RPPHUFLDO2IILFH
&2
+LJKZD\&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&+6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQW
,

/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG8VH
1HLJKERUKRRG0L[HG8VH
108
,VDEHO1HLJKERUKRRG63
,163
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG2SHQ
712

2WKHU
(GXFDWLRQDQG,QVWLWXWLRQV
(
2SHQ6SDFH
26 6RXWK/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\$JULFXOWXUDO
6/9$*

3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
5HVLGHQWLDO
5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO
55 /RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ5HVLGHQWLDO
56 6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW\%RXQGDULHV
/LYHUPRUH&LW\/LPLWV6SKHUHRI,QIOXHQFH8UEDQ*URZWK%RXQGDU\ š
$9,$12
:<
,$%/2
(:'5
   
0LOHV
3'6/963
3'6/963
38'

3'6/963
$LUSRUW
$LUSRUW6HUYLFH
$,56(
$LUSRUW2SHUDWLRQV
$,523

&RPPHUFLDO
'RZQWRZQ6SHFLILF3ODQ
'63
&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&6
3URIHVVLRQDO2IILFH
&3
&RPPHUFLDO2IILFH
&2
+LJKZD\&RPPHUFLDO6HUYLFH
&+6
1HLJKERUKRRG%XVLQHVV&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
,
+HDY\,QGXVWULDO
,

0L[HG8VH
1HLJKERUKRRG0L[HG8VH
108
,VDEHO1HLJKERUKRRG63
,163
7UDQVHFW =RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW=RQH71HLJKERUKRRG
71
7UDQVHFW =RQH71HLJKERUKRRG2SHQ
712

6RXWK/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\$JULFXOWXUDO
6/9$*

3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
3ODQQHG'HYHORSPHQW
5HVLGHQWLDO
5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO
55 /RZ'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
5/
6XEXUEDQ5HVLGHQWLDO
56 6XEXUEDQ0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
5*
0XOWLSOH)DPLO\5HVLGHQWLDO
0)5

&LW %R QGDULHV
8SGDWHGRQ-XQH 8SGDWHGRQ-XQH 9th, 2026
&RPPHUFLDO
&1%

,QGXVWULDO
5HVHDUFKDQG'HYHORSPHQW
,

2WKHU
(GXFDWLRQDQG,QVWLWXWLRQV
(
2SHQ6SDFH
26 &LW\ %RXQGDULHV
/LYHUPRUH&LW\/LPLWV6SKHUHRI,QIOXHQFH8UEDQ*URZWK%RXQGDU\ +,// '5
,567 ) 67 67 ,567 )
1(<$5
3'6/963
3'6/963
38'

3'6/963
&LW\RI/LYHUPRUH=RQLQJ0DS
Proposed

EXHIBIT B
761
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING POLICY PROPOSAL (POL) 26-002 FOR THE SCENIC RESOURCES POLICY TO IMPLEMENT THE GENERAL PLAN 2045

COMMUNITY IDENTITY ELEMENT
Livermore General Plan 2045 updates the City’s 2003-2025 General Plan and establishes a long-term vision, goals, policies, implementation actions and land use designations to guide future decision making related to growth, development, and resource conservation through horizon year 2045. The General Plan addresses State required elements as well as locally important topics, including community identity.

The 2003-2025 General Plan establishes regulatory scenic corridor development standards through the application of view angles.

The Livermore General Plan 2045 establishes a higher-level policy framework to promote scenic resources in balance with other community and economic development goals through high-quality architectural and landscape design within Scenic Resource Areas and context-sensitive development within Scenic View Areas to preserve and enhance scenic views by ensuring that new development is compatible with the community.

Livermore General Plan 2045 includes Action CI-A-10.1, which calls for the establishment of Scenic Overlay Districts to ensure development preserves views of Livermore's scenic resources, remains subordinate to natural landforms, and reflects the City's urban aesthetic qualities and implements the Scenic Resources policies.

The City initiated an application for Policy Proposal (POL) 26-002 to implement the General Plan 2045 Community Identity Element by maintaining existing Scenic Corridor standards (the “Project”) under separate cover until such time as a new Scenic Overlay District (and other applicable standards) are created and adopted to regulate the Scenic View Areas based on local context.

The environmental effects of the Project have been evaluated in the Livermore General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).

At a duly noticed public hearing on July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the Project and staff recommendation, heard public testimony, made the necessary findings and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, containing the Planning Commission’s actions and/or recommendations thereon.
762
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
On July 27, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the Record Evidence and adopted a resolution certifying an Environmental Impact Report.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this Resolution. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby approves the Scenic Resources Policy (POL26- 002), attached hereto as Exhibit B.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore California.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on July 27, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
763
3 RESOLUTION NO. ________
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ Katherine Mirassou
Helena Graves Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-26
Exhibit B – Scenic Resources Policy
764

EXHIBIT A
765

EXHIBIT A
766

EXHIBIT A
767
Scenic Resources Policy
General Plan Figure CI-2 illustrates locations that provide opportunities to experience a variety of views or partial views of the city’s scenic resources. These include the rolling hills, ridgelines, prominent peaks, and other natural features that form the backdrop to the Livermore Valley. From these vantage points, visitors and residents can appreciate the visual character that defines Livermore’s identity. The Scenic Resource Policy intends to regulate the Scenic View Areas shown in General Plan Figure CI-2 through the implementation of the Scenic Corridor.

The Scenic Corridor is defined as the area which is within 3,500 feet on each side of the centerline of I-580, and visible from the I-580 roadway. Development in the Scenic Resource Policy Areas must preserve, to the largest degree feasible, the view of the ridgelines as seen from the roadway. To that end, no development, structures or man-made objects except plantings erected for landscaping purposes may obscure any portion of the ridgeline as seen from the I-580 roadway, except as provided in this Policy Document. Landscaping, including trees, shall be planted in a manner such that when mature, it does not create a wall-like effect that substantially obscures views of the ridgeline.

EXHIBIT B
768

1. Exceptions/Exemptions to I-580 Scenic Corridor Development Requirements Development in the I-580 Scenic Corridor may only take place outside of the view angle envelopes and/or within established view corridors on parcels created before August 14, 2000, consistent with the North Livermore Growth Boundary Initiative, as follows (NLUGBI):
a. Where application of the regulations contained in the Scenic Route Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Actions would, based on the legal opinion of the City Attorney, deprive a private property owner of substantially all reasonable economic use of the lot, and where the City Council finds both of the following:
(1) That the development is spaced sufficiently on the lot so as not to create the effect of a wall between the viewer and the ridgeline; and
(2) That the development on the lot does not detract from the scenic value of the corridor; or, b. Where it is determined that new public works projects or elements render the development no longer visible from a view point along I-580; or,
c. Where the development consists of public works projects and facilities of public necessity; or, d. Where the development consists of reconstructing a structure which existed prior to August 14, 2000, and where the height and area of the new structure does not exceed that of the pre-existing structure; or,
e. Where the development does not exceed a view angle created by an existing structure. The view angle is measured from the roofline of the existing structure closest to the freeway as viewed at a 90-degree angle to the freeway. Only that portion of the proposed development located directly in front of the existing structure may exceed the adopted view angle.

2. I-580 Scenic Corridor Zones – Limitations on Ground Contour Changes In the I-580 Scenic Corridor, to the extent consistent with the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative, the following limits apply to changes in the natural ground contours (NLUGBI):
(a) Zone I: Within 2,000 feet of the center line of I-580, alterations are allowed in slope areas to ten percent, defined as the lowest lying ten percent slope at the base of the hill area. In addition, an area equal to five percent of the overall Zone I area within the property to be developed can be altered above the ten percent slope. This additional area shall be distributed evenly along the ten percent slope but shall not intrude into the adjacent fifteen percent slope.

EXHIBIT B
769
(b) Zone II: Between 2,000 feet and 2,500 feet of the centerline of I-580, alterations are allowed in slope areas to fifteen percent, defined as the lowest lying fifteen percent slope at the base of the hill area. In addition, an area equal to seven and one-half percent of the overall Zone II area within the property to be developed can be altered above the fifteen percent slope.

This additional area shall be distributed evenly along the fifteen percent slope but shall not intrude into the adjacent twenty percent slope.
(c) Zone III: Between 2,500 and 3,500 feet of the centerline of I-580, alterations are allowed in the slope areas to twenty percent defined as the lowest lying twenty percent slope at the base of the hill area. In addition, an area equal to seven and one-half percent of the overall Zone III area within the property to be developed can be altered above the twenty percent slope.

This additional area shall be distributed evenly along the adjacent twenty percent slope but shall not intrude into a twenty-five percent slope.
(d) Exceptions: The following exceptions apply to the area north of North Canyons Parkway, and bounded on the east by Independence Drive, and on the west by Doolan Road (as shown on Figure 4-1.1) and described as Parcels B (PM 7522), C, D, and E (PM 7640). i. In addition, an area equal to five percent of the overall Zone 1 area within the property to be developed can be altered above the 10-percent slope and may be calculated based on the entire site area and redistributed as indicated on Figure 4-1.1. Total area of additional alteration above the 10-percent slope is not to exceed 3.1 acres, as shown on Figure 4-1.1. ii. In addition, two knoll areas (as identified on Figure 4-1.1) within the Zone 1 area of existing Parcel E may also be altered. Total area of additional alteration of knoll area on Parcel E is not to exceed 1.5 acres.
iii. In order to ensure above provisions (i) and (ii) are implemented as approved, and that potential future purchasers of property affected by the above restrictions are made aware of the contour alteration exceptions and restrictions on the specific affected parcels within the subject site (parcels E, D, C of PM 7640, and B of PM 7522): a) the implementing zoning district (PDI-00-181) shall be amended to reflect the above contour alteration exceptions and restrictions as shown on Figure 4.1.1 and to include a 100-foot building setback from the rear property line of existing Parcel E; b) the current owner shall record a notice or deed restriction for the affected parcels which outlines the contour alteration exceptions and restrictions governing the affected parcels, as shown on Figure 4-1.1. (e) Exemptions: In Subarea 1, Subpart C, exemptions to limitations on slope alterations may be granted by the City Council for public works projects and facilities of public necessity, which include the extension of Portola Avenue from Isabel Avenue to I-580, the Community College access road from Portola Avenue to the southern boundary of the College property, and a

EXHIBIT B
770
neighborhood park located northeast of the Portola Avenue/Isabel Avenue intersection. The City shall find that the necessary public facilities provide broader regional, community, or neighborhood benefits. Grading shall utilize slope contouring or other appropriate methods to avoid the use of terracing and/or retaining walls, to the extent feasible, which would result in undesirable geometric landforms.

Figure 4-1.1 – TKG Grading Exception

EXHIBIT B
771
FIGURE 4 - FIGURE 4 - 1.1
( R e s o . 0 4 - 1 7 8 )

N O R T H C A N Y O N S P A R K W A Y E X C E P T I O N S

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT B
772

3. Grading
(a) Grading shall be limited so as to preserve natural features where large stands of vegetation, scenic natural formations, or natural watercourses exist. (b) Any contour altered by grading should be restored by means of land sculpturing in such a manner as to minimize run-off and erosion problems and should be planted with low-maintenance plant materials that are compatible with the existing environment and the intent of the Scenic Route goals, objectives, policies, and actions.
(c) Neither (a) nor (b) above shall preclude the restorations identified within Subparts 5A and 5B of Subarea 5.

4. I-580 Scenic Corridor Subareas
The I-580 Scenic Corridor is divided into six subareas, as shown in Figure 4-2. Policies and development standards are identified for each subarea that reflect the unique visual resources in each area.

Development is not permitted if it is inconsistent with the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative (NLUGBI). The policies and development standards (such as identified view angles) are intended to preserve views to ridgelines and hillsides as seen from I-580. Development within each Subarea shall also be subject to the general Scenic Corridor design standards contained in Objective CC-4.10 and related policies, except as otherwise expressly provided.

Subarea 1- Development Requirements
a. Subarea 1 is located on the north side of the I-580 freeway. The west boundary of Area 1 is approximately 200 feet west of Doolan Canyon Road; the east boundary is approximately one-mile west of North Livermore Avenue. Figure 4-3 establishes the boundary of Subarea 1. b. The following criteria shall be implemented through project specific conditions contained in all Planned Development and Site Plan Approvals for development within Subarea 1:

Figure 4-2 – Scenic Route Subareas

EXHIBIT B
773
FIGURE 4 - 2

SCENIC ROUTE SUBAREAS

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT
B
774
(Reso. 2005-178)

EXHIBIT B
775

EXHIBIT B
776
5 ac.

East
Airway
Core
Area
Portola

COLLIER CANYON RD

PORTOLA AVE

ISABEL AVE

NORTH CANYONS PKWY

NORTH CANYONS PKWY

CONSTITUTION DR

INDEPENDENCE DR

AIRWAY BLVD

KITTY HAWK RD

LINDBERGH DR

NISSEN DR

ARMSTRONG ST AIRWAY BLVD
E. AIRWAY BLVD

ISABEL AVE

PORTOLA AVE
E. AIRWAY BLVD

RUTAN DR

DOOLAN RD
INTERSTATE 580
580
Las Positas
College
Valley Link to Isabel Station
A rr o y o L a s Po s i t a s
Livermore Municipal Airport
A r r o y o L a s P o s i t a s
C o l l i e r C a n y o n C r e e k
A r ro y o L a s P o s i t a s

GATEWAY AVE

SREALTH ST

SUTTER ST

SHEA CENTER DR
Cayetano
Park
Livermore
Valley
Charter
School
0 500 1000 2000
FEET
Isabel Neighborhood
Scenic Corridor
Amendment Areas
Urban Growth Boundary
Planning Area
Scenic Corridor Amendment Areas
495 Building + Elevation MSL
430-439
440-449
450-459
460-469
470-479
480-489
490-499
500-509
Remains Subject to
Scenic Corridor Policies
Building Height as shown in Feet
above Mean Sea Level

NORT DOOLAN RD

TRIAD SCENIC

CORRIDOR
View elevation:

Above 15% grade
average slope
contour line
115
feet
175
feet COLLIER CANYON

SCENIC CORRIDOR
View elevation:

Above 600 foot
contour line

NOR INDEPENDENCE DR

AIRWAY BLVD
Valley Link to Isabel Station
rmore
lley
arter
hool
C
n:
ade
ee
E
DOOLAN
SCENIC

CORRIDOR
460 485
475
485 490
485
495 500 475 500
475
485 490
495
495
505
490
495
495
495
495
490
495
495
485
450
455
450 465 460
465
485 475 465
465 460
460
475
465
485 475
Subject to FAR Part 77
height limits
485
455 500 480
470
490
480
465
430
430
FIGURE 4-3.B

EXHIBIT B
777
(1) View Corridors
View corridors shall be provided as listed below:
(a) Doolan Canyon: Provide 200 +/- wide view corridor at approximately 90 degrees from I-580. (Most of this corridor is presently outside City limits.) This corridor would require clear areas at approximately I-580 viewing elevation. (b) Triad: Provide a view corridor at approximately 60 degrees to west I-580 lanes. Views are to the 15 percent grade average slope contour line at view corridor terminus. The view corridor shall be 115 +/- feet wide. The location of the view corridor, as identified on Figure 4-4, shall generally follow the right-of-way of Independence Drive. (c) Collier Canyon: Provide a 175 +/- foot wide view corridor to Collier Canyon generally at 90 degrees to I-580 and centered on Collier Canyon Road (Figure 4-4). This corridor would require clear areas which maintain views above the 600-foot contour line of the hills at the canyon mouth.
(2) View Angles
Development within Subarea 1 shall take place within the view angle envelopes created by using the view angles designated below. For the purposes of establishing these view angles, Subarea 1 has been divided into 3 subparts. These subparts reflect differing terrain, visual resources, subdivision configuration, freeway/view relationships, and regulatory histories within each part.

Figure 4-3 identifies the subparts of Subarea 1. Subpart A (commonly referred to as Triadwest) includes the westerly ¼ +/- of Subarea 1. Subpart B (commonly referred to as Triad-east) covers the next easterly approximate ¼ of Subarea 1 to Collier Canyon Road.

Subpart C (commonly referred to as Shea Properties) involves the easterly ½ of Subarea

1. Within each subpart, view angles are established as follows using the criteria outlined in Section C.5 (I-580 Scenic Corridor Implementation):

EXHIBIT B
778
figure 4-4
S U B A R E A 1 V I E W C O R R I D O R S

L I V E R M O R E G E N E R A L P L A N
(Reso. 2005-178)

EXHIBIT B
779
 Subpart A (Triad West) = 3.6 degrees
 Subpart B (Triad East) = 3.2 degrees
 Subpart C (Shea Properties West) = 2.45 degrees, except as shown on Figure 4-3A  Subpart D (Shea Properties East) = As shown on 4-3A.

These view angles shall be applied at any point at 90 degrees to I-580. The view surface created by this application shall establish a proposed building's compliance with the height envelope maximum determined for preservation of ridgeline and hillside views in Subarea 1 of the I-580 Scenic Corridor.
(3) View Angle and View Corridor Exceptions
In addition to the exceptions outlined in Section C, Exceptions/Exemptions to I-580 Scenic Corridor Development Requirements, development may take place outside of the view angle envelope where it is located within the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Scenic Corridor exemption areas as shown in the Specific Plan and on Figure 4.3.b.

Subarea 2
Subarea 2 is located on the north side of I-580 approximately 5,000 feet west and 6,500 feet east of the North Livermore Avenue interchange. This area is located outside the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary, except in the area of Las Colinas Road.

Subarea 3
a. Subarea 3 is located on the north side of the I-580 freeway. The west boundary of Subarea 3 is approximately one-half mile west of the Springtown Boulevard interchange; the east boundary is the I-580 Greenville Road on-ramp. Figure 4-6 establishes the boundary of Subarea 3.
b. Subarea 3 is further divided into four subparts. These subparts reflect different terrain, visual resources, freeway/view relationships, and degrees of existing development and view obstruction.

EXHIBIT B
780
0 XX XX feet

L I V E R M O R E G E N E R A L P L A N
FIGURE 4 - 5
I S A B E L I N T E R C H A N G E 1 0 0 0 ' R A D I U S City of Livermore Scenic Corridor (3,500 foot limit)
Las Positas Collge
1,000 ft
radius
APA Limit
City L mi it Line
Note: The location of the future Isabel interchange is approximate. Final location and design to be determined through future engineering studies.

EXHIBIT B
781
Figure 4-6 also defines the four Subparts of Subarea 3. From east to west, these include:

Subpart A, between the Greenville Road on-ramp and Herman Avenue; Subpart B, from Herman Avenue to Vasco Road; Subpart C from Vasco Road to Springtown Boulevard; and Subpart D, from Springtown Boulevard to approximately one-half mile west of Springtown Boulevard. c. Subparts A and B.
(1) For Subparts A and B, new development shall preserve the views of the distant hills. The views to be preserved are the upper one-third of the distant hillsides in Subpart A and the upper one-quarter of the distant hillsides in Subpart B.

(2) The view angles corresponding to these view preservation goals are 1.58 degrees for Subpart A and 1.90 degrees for Subpart B. The view surfaces created by these view angles establishes the maximum building height elevation for development within Subparts A and B.
(3) Applications for development within Subparts A and B shall demonstrate that the heights of proposed structures are below the view surfaces created by the 1.58 degree angle for Subpart A and 1.90 degree angle for Subpart B.
(4) The merger of existing lots is encouraged where the resulting larger lot provides additional development options while avoiding or reducing the impacts to the identified view surfaces. Where development on the merged lots is proposed above the identified view surfaces, the above findings are still required. (5) For Subpart A, the above findings shall not apply to the parcel at the eastern periphery of Subpart A, located between Northfront Road, Interstate 580 (I-580), and the I-580 westbound on-ramp. For this parcel, the maximum building height created by the 1.58 degree view angle may be exceeded by a maximum of 5 feet, with City Council approval, subject to the following findings: The project will preserve intermittent views of distant hills; the project building facades have been located at varying distances from I-580 to avoid the appearance of a uniform “wall” of development; the project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings.

EXHIBIT B
782
FIGURE 4 - 6
SCENIC ROUTE SUBAREA 3

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT
B
783
d. Subpart C.

For Subpart C, the majority of views of the distant hills have been obstructed by existing development. Remaining views are minimal and do not require preservation. However, in areas where views are obstructed by the existing freeway noise barrier, new development shall not be visible above the noise barrier (when viewed at 90 degrees, from a view point along the northerly edge of I-580 four feet above the pavement).
e. Subpart D.

The general landform should be protected and new development shall comply with all applicable general regulations contained in goals, objectives, policies and actions pertaining to Scenic Corridor Design Requirements under Goal CC-7. Section C.2(a) requirements, which limit the percentage of areas of 10-15 percent slope category which may be altered, shall not apply to public or private primary access roadways. The limitations on the alterations of natural ground contours shall still apply to all other development, including the locational criteria of visible development on the lowest lying ten percent slope at the base of the hill area. Development on other areas of up to ten percent slopes shall not be visible from freeway. Visibility of the development shall be measured as shown on Figure 4-7.

Subarea 4
Subarea 4 is located on the south side of I-580, from the west side of the First Street interchange to Greenville Road.
a. The City recognizes that Subarea 4, as shown on Figure 4-8, contains visual resources in the form of the Altamont Pass to the east of the distant hills to the south. The existing development patterns, infrastructure investment and the development potential of the industrial and commercial land within Subarea 4, limit visibility to the hills. Therefore, it is not feasible to fully protect all remaining views of the hills in this area. For this reason, the built environment and visual appearance of new development

EXHIBIT B
784
FIGURE 4 - 7
SUBAREA 3, SUBPART D

VISUAL ANALYSIS LOCATIONS

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT B
785
FIGURE 4 - 8
SCENIC ROUTE SUBAREA 4

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT
B
786
within the sub-area is considered equally important to create and maintain an aesthetically appealing urban presence in the scenic corridor.
b. The review of development applications within Subarea 4 shall be conducted to determine if proposed building locations and landscaping have been optimized to preserve visual resources where feasible. Because development along Southfront Road constitutes a significant portion of the visual resources in the area, special attention and consideration shall be given to the following:
(1) Adjacent building facades and development massing shall be located at varying distances from I-580 in order to avoid or reduce the appearance of a uniform “wall” of development.

Building locations which promote visual corridors and glimpses toward the hills, in particular the Altamont Hills for travel in the eastbound direction, are encouraged whenever feasible.
(2) Parking lot layout and landscaping shall be designed to help promote views and enhance the corridor's visual character to the greatest extent feasible. (3) Building design and architectural treatment shall minimize a wall-like effect parallel to the freeway and enhance the visual character of the corridor. (4) Buildings shall be the visually predominant structures on parcel frontages along Southfront Road. Walls, fences and other screening associated with outdoor storage areas or security shall be located a minimum of 15 feet back from the building facade facing the freeway.

Subarea 5
a. Subarea 5 is located on the south side of the I-580 freeway. The western boundary of Subarea 5 is defined by a point along the I-580 freeway, roughly equidistant between North Livermore Avenue and the Portola Avenue overcrossing. The eastern boundary is defined by First Street.

Figure 4-9 establishes the boundary of Subarea 5.
b. Subarea 5 is further divided into three subparts. These subparts reflect natural dividing lines using roadways, parcel lines, visual resources, freeway/view relationships and areas of existing development and view obstruction. Figure 4-9 identifies the three subparts, 5A, 5B and 5C.

EXHIBIT B
787
c. Subarea 5 contains rolling hills in close proximity to the freeway. These hills are considered individual visual resources, and are identified as Hills A through F in Figure 4-11. The height and location of each hill provides the basis for establishing view angles within Subarea 5. d. Subpart 5A.

For Subpart 5A, the following shall apply:
(1) The landform between North Livermore Avenue and the Portola Avenue on/off ramp contains a ridgeline and visual features to protect. The ridgeline has two zones of primary protection and two zones of secondary protection. (See Figure 4-10) One Primary Protection Zone shall be 550 feet in width measured approximately 130 feet to the east and 420 feet to the west from the ridge peak (an elevation of 492.6 feet). Because of previous grading that took place, up to 2 feet of soil shall be replaced within this zone and on this ridge for purposes of restoration of the natural landform. Such restoration shall be subject to obtaining an approved grading permit as part of a City approved development plan.

The other Primary Protection Zone shall be located from North Livermore Avenue west approximately 430 feet measured along the ridge line. No restoration is permitted within this Primary Protection Zone.

EXHIBIT B
788
FIGURE 4 - 9
SCENIC ROUTE SUBAREA 5

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT
B
789
One Secondary Protection Zone shall be between the two Primary Protection Zones.

Only 150 feet within this zone (as established by Figure 4-10) shall be permitted to be augmented. A berm up to a maximum of 9 feet may be located within the 150-foot area per Figure 4-10.

The second Secondary Protection Zone shall begin at the western boundary of the Primary Protection Zone which includes the Area of Restoration. It shall continue west for approximately 200 feet. A berm up to a maximum of 7 feet at about 40 feet east of the Davidon property line may slope continuously downward at 0 feet grade at the west end of the Secondary Protection Zone. Landform augmentation of any kind is permitted only after the project has met the conditions as established in Section C.2 and 3 of this Chapter. (2) Any augmentation and restoration in Subpart 5A shall be subject to a grading permit and shall be designed and graded to make the landform on all sides consistent in natural form such that it cannot be identified as an augmented landform. (3) All structures south of the ridge, in the portion of Subpart 5A identified in Figure 4-10, shall be subject to the following:
(a) The residential units for the Davidon project site that are closest to the northern boundary shall be single-story or not exceed 20 feet in height except for Lot 78 (per Tract Map #6522) which can be two-story but not exceed 27 feet in height. (b) All remaining residential townhouse structures on the Davidon site shall not exceed 27 feet in height.
(c) Whether or not visible from the Scenic Corridor, all roof and building materials for residential and commercial developments shall be earth tones, non-reflective and blend with the land form and natural setting.

EXHIBIT B
790
FIGURE 4 - 10
SUBAREA 5, SUBPART 5A

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT B
791
(d) All commercial and residential structures on the Connolly project site shall not penetrate the surface established by drawing a line from a point four feet above the I-580 freeway surface and the highest point of the building (27 feet) on the proposed commercial market per the City approved Site Plan or an elevation of 496 feet. (e) For the Connolly project site only, a 25-foot wide landscape easement shall be created contiguous with and south of the Rose Lawn Cemetery. This landscape easement shall extend from North Livermore Avenue along the full length of the Rose Lawn Cemetery or approximately 670 feet in length. The purpose of the landscape easement is to provide for protection and continued maintenance of the landscaping within the easement on the property south of the Rose Lawn Cemetery and for the planting of native California species within this same easement for the express purpose of providing for a permanent and perpetual foliage screen as viewed from the I-580 Scenic Corridor.

For the Davidon project site only, the area of restoration and augmentation shall be revegetated consistent with the landscape plans approved under the Housing Implementation Program (HIP). (4) Parcels between the Arroyo and the freeway are designated Open Space in this location, and therefore no additional policies or standards are required. f. Subpart 5B
Subpart 5B is located between North Livermore Avenue and the Las Colinas overcrossing. (1) For Subpart 5B, new development shall preserve the views of rolling foreground hills. The views to be preserved are the upper one-half (50%) of the hill for Hills A through D, as measured from the 500-foot contour line to the top of the hill (Figure 4-11). For Hill E, views to be preserved are the upper one-quarter (25%) of the hill, as measured from the 500-foot contour line to the top of the hill.
(2) The view angles corresponding to these hills and view preservation goals for Subpart 5B, as depicted in Figure 4-11, are as follows:
(a) View angle for Hill A and Hill B = 2.4 degrees
(b) View angle for Hill C and Hill D = 3.8 degrees

EXHIBIT B
792
(c) View angle for Hill E = 5.9 degrees
(3) The western portion of the ridgeline of Hill A, from North Livermore Avenue to approximately 700 feet east, was previously altered. Restoration of this portion of the ridgeline is permitted subject to the following criteria:
(a) The restoration of the ridgeline does not exceed an additional five feet of elevation from any point along the existing ridgeline;
(b) The restoration results in an exact recreation of the ridgeline shape as viewed from I580; and; (c) The restoration is otherwise consistent with Scenic Route goals and policies. g. Subpart 5C
Subpart 5C is located between the Las Colinas overcrossing and First Street. (1) For Subpart 5C, new development shall preserve the views of rolling foreground hills. The views to be preserved are the upper one-quarter (25%) of each hill, as measured from the 510-foot contour line to the top of the hill.
(2) The view angle corresponding to these hills and view preservation goals for Subpart 5C, as depicted in Figure 4-11, is 5.9 degrees for Hill F and Hill G. (3) For the existing commercial development in Subpart 5C, any new structures, additions or alternations shall not exceed existing building heights. (4) Subpart 5C contains an area east of the Las Colinas overpass that is “visually constrained”, as identified in Figure 4-11. No new policies or standards apply to this area.

EXHIBIT B
793
FIGURE 4 - 11
SUBAREA 5 VIEW ANGLES

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT
B
794
Subarea 6
a. Subarea 6 is located on the south side of the I-580 freeway. The western boundary of Subarea 6 is El Charro Road. The eastern boundary is located roughly equidistant between the Portola Avenue overcrossing and North Livermore Avenue. Figures 4-12 and 4-13 establish the boundaries for Subarea 6.
b. Subarea 6 is divided into three subparts. These subparts reflect natural dividing lines using roadways, visual resources, freeway/view relationships and areas of existing development.

Figure 4-12 identifies Subpart 6A, and Figure 4-13 identifies Subparts 6B and 6C. Subarea 6 contains views to distant hills and ridgelines low on the horizon. c. Subpart 6A extends from El Charro Road to the west to Airway Boulevard to the east. The western half consists of nearly level agricultural fields and undeveloped parcels. Las Positas Golf Course comprises the eastern half. A golf driving range is located in the center of the Subpart, with fields on either side. Farmhouses, barns and other structures related to local agriculture are located within this area.

A 2.2 degree view angle is established for this Subpart to preserve views of the ridgelines. d. Subpart 6B extends from Airway Boulevard to approximately 400 feet west of Sutter Street. Existing industrial and commercial development is located between Airway Boulevard and Kitty Hawk Road. East of Kitty Hawk Road, the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) owns approximately 50 acres and is proposed for a future BART station. The new Isabel Parkway interchange will be located in this area. Existing agriculture lands are located south of East Airway Boulevard and west of Sutter Street.

A 2.2 degree view angle is established for this Subpart to preserve views of the ridgelines with the following exceptions:

Figure 4-12 (EXHIBIT I) Subpart 6A

EXHIBIT B
795
FIGURE 4 - FIGURE 4 - 12
( R e s o . 0 7 - 1 4 3 )
S C E N I C R O U T E S U B P A R T 6 A

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT B
796
FIGURE 4 - 13
S C E N I C R O U T E S U B P A R T S 6 B A N D 6 C

L I V E R M O R E G E N E R A L P L A N

EXHIBIT B
797
(1) The City-owned parcel located north of Kitty Hawk Road and east of Airway Boulevard shall be left undeveloped and the area landscaped.
(2) The parcel located north of the Extended Stay is constrained by an existing PT&T easement that runs east/west through the middle of the parcel. Development shall be located on the western half of the parcel and may include up to a two-story building not to exceed 40 feet in height.
(3) Development of the Caltrans property located adjacent to the freeway on Kitty Hawk Road shall include a landscaped buffer of 25 feet along the freeway. Trees within this landscaped area shall be placed a minimum of 30 feet apart. (4) Future development on the BART property for the proposed station and interchange is encouraged to maintain Arroyo Las Positas in its natural form with minimal alterations. e. Subpart 6C extends from approximately 400 feet west of Sutter Street to approximately midway between the overcrossing and North Livermore Avenue. Visual resources in this area impacted by existing development or by significantly lower freeway elevations compared to adjacent parcels. This area is almost fully developed with commercial and residential uses.

Between the arroyo and the freeway, there is the potential for one single-family residence only.

Building height for residences shall be a maximum of 25 feet above existing grade. Building heights for the commercial parcels located on the north side of Portola Avenue opposite Murrieta Boulevard shall not exceed 30 feet to ensure preservation of views in this area.

5. Establishing View Angles
As applicable, each subpart in each Subarea (except Subarea 4) is assigned a view angle which represents the plane by which building height limits are determined. The City has established this view angle utilizing the following objectives and data:
♦ Land use policies for each subpart;
♦ The elevation of ridges and other visual resources within the subpart; ♦ The elevation of the freeway viewing area;
♦ Existing development patterns.

A view angle is established for each subpart utilizing view analysis which uses the following general criteria:

EXHIBIT B
798
♦ View points along the freeway (I-580) are selected at 500-1,000 foot intervals along the frontage of each subpart. ♦ View direction sight lines from these freeway view points are taken at 90 degrees to I-580 with other directions of view to supplement the 90 degrees as determined necessary. ♦ The view angle at each view point is established as a plane line to the ridge at an elevation point determined appropriate to maintain the view consistent with other subarea objectives. ♦ The plane is expressed in degrees commencing four feet above the freeway’s outside lane elevation as the base point. One or more initial view angles are developed per subpart. In the vicinity of the Airway Boulevard Interchange in Subarea 1, a “clothesline” elevation has been established which compensates for the change in elevation under the overpass. The clothesline elevation is located between the 404.16 foot elevation on the west side of the overpass and the 421.05 foot elevation on the east side of the overpass as illustrated in Figure 4-14.

Where several view points/angles are used for initial analysis, a single view angle is selected (as a weighted average) representing the most appropriate view protection objectives for the subarea.
♦ This single view angle, expressed in degrees above horizontal slope, is used to establish a sloped view surface covering the total subpart. This view angle is applied at multiple view points along I-580 to establish a view surface (said surface will vary depending upon the elevation of the view point). Where the ridgeline drops below this surface,

EXHIBIT B
799
FIGURE 4 - 14

TRIAD MINIMUM/MAXIMUM BUILDING CLEARANCES

LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN

EXHIBIT
B
800
the line is extended across the “gap” creating a “clothesline” connecting the ridge segments.

Establishing Maximum Building Heights Via View Angle “Envelopes” ♦ The view surface establishes the maximum height of development within various parts of the subpart. The height limit will vary between each subpart and within each subpart depending on the view surface, site topography, and geographic location, in relationship to I-580 and elevation of the existing grades. Generally, lands closer to I-580 will have more restrictive height limits. These view surfaces will establish an “envelope” of height limits that can be specifically determined and translated to project specific criteria within all Site Plan Approvals.

Standards will be calculated and measured from existing grade of lands involved. Maximum building heights may be adjusted to account for differences between existing and finished grades. In no case, however, shall the building heights protrude into the identified view surface or exceed other normally required height limits.

EXHIBIT B
801
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7.4
DATE: July 27, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Hearing to introduce an ordinance and waive the first reading authorizing Development Agreement 24-004 to establish a framework and secure vested rights for a future residential project on approximately 50 developable acres within a 122-acre property at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Assessor Parcel Number 902-8-1). The Development Agreement does not propose or authorize a specific development project or physical development, and future implementation actions would be subject to subsequent approvals.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution finding that Development Agreement 24-004 is within the scope of the certified General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 and that the Agreement has no potential to cause a significant environmental effect and is, therefore, exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and

2. Introduce an Ordinance, and waive the first reading, authorizing the City Manager to execute Development Agreement (DA) 24-004.

SUMMARY
The City received an application for a Development Agreement (DA 24-004) from Adventus, the owner of the 122-acre property at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Assessor Parcel Number 902-8-1) as part of the City's evaluation of potential land use changes during the General Plan 2045 update process. The property is undeveloped and generally located south of the Redwood Road terminus and north of Las Colinas Road (Attachment 1, Location Map). In February 2025, the City Council authorized staff to negotiate a Development Agreement concurrently with the update to ensure that it would function as an implementing mechanism of the General Plan 2045.

Development Agreement 24-004 establishes a framework and secures vested rights for the potential future development of approximately 50 developable acres within the larger property, including between 605 and 900 residential units consistent with the General Plan 2045 land use designations. It also 802
outlines required affordable housing obligations, infrastructure improvements, community benefit contributions, and subsequent approvals that must occur before any development may occur, which include preparation and adoption of a Neighborhood Plan and entitlements. The Development Agreement does not approve a specific development project or grant new development rights beyond those allowed under the General Plan; rather, it establishes the terms, timing, community benefits, and implementation requirements that would guide future development on the property. The Development Agreement is provided as Exhibit B to the Ordinance.

In accordance with CEQA Guidelines, staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council find that the Development Agreement is within the scope of the General Plan 2045 Program EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and is also exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), Common Sense. The Development Agreement does not authorize any physical development, and any future development proposals will undergo the appropriate discretionary and environmental review when proposed.

DISCUSSION

BACKGROUND
As part of the General Plan 2045 Update, staff conducted a comprehensive, citywide review of land use designations to align long-term growth with community goals and policies. During this process, Adventus, the property owner at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Property), requested consideration of revised land use designations to allow for residential use on a portion of the subject property. There was an existing Development Agreement for the Property that permits a Catholic High School at this site; however, the High School is no longer viable according to the property owner. Staff evaluated this land use change request within the broader context of citywide planning objectives, including housing needs, opportunities for community benefit, open space preservation, infrastructure needs, and consistency with the General Plan's policy framework. Staff concluded that a land use change would need defined public benefits, infrastructure obligations, and implementation timing. A Development Agreement was identified as the appropriate tool to formalize these commitments and ensure consistency with General Plan goals.

Following this determination, Adventus submitted an application for a Development Agreement on December 9, 2024. On February 24, 2025, the City Council authorized staff to negotiate the agreement in coordination with the General Plan Update and directed staff to explore opportunities related to increased residential densities, infrastructure improvements, and contributions to the Community Benefit Fund. Staff has since completed negotiations with Adventus and finalized the terms and provisions in the Development Agreement.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Development Agreement establishes a framework for the potential future development of residential uses on approximately 50 developable acres within the overall 122-acre property at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Project) (see Attachment 1, Location Map). The Project may include between 605 to 900 dwelling units at residential densities ranging from 8 to 30 units per acre within conceptually defined development areas, along with associated improvements such as common open space, a neighborhood park, stormwater treatment facilities, private internal roadways, pedestrian and bicycle trails, and related onand off-site infrastructure, as conceptually illustrated in Attachment 7, Development Agreement, Exhibits B and C. The remaining acreage outside the developable areas is not authorized for residential use and 803
would be preserved as open space or improved consistent with the Agreement, the General Plan, and subsequent discretionary approvals.

The Development Agreement does not approve a specific development project, rather, it establishes obligations and implementation requirements to guide future development proposals. Any physical development of the site would require separate review and approval through subsequent discretionary actions, including:

1. Neighborhood Plan and Planned Development zoning to establish detailed land use, circulation, open space, development and design parameters, and ensure compatibility with the terrain, topography, natural features and surrounding neighborhood;

2. Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the property into legal development parcels;

3. Site Plan Design Review to demonstrate compliance with applicable development and design standards; and

4. Environmental review under CEQA for each subsequent discretionary approval.

These subsequent approvals would require review by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to any construction.

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT
The Property, located along the northern side of Interstate 580 and Las Colinas Road, is undeveloped and characterized by a range of natural features, including rolling hillside topography, grassland open space, and the confluence of two natural creek corridors (i.e., Arroyo Seco and Arroyo Las Positas) that traverse portions of the site. The Property is situated in proximity to the Springtown neighborhood and lies adjacent to or near existing and planned single-family and multi-family residential communities to the north and east. Portions of the Property's southern and western boundaries are adjacent to unincorporated Alameda County land, which consist primarily of rural residential, open space, and agricultural uses.

STAFF ANALYSIS
General Plan
Land Use. The Development Agreement is consistent with the Property's General Plan 2045 land use designations, including Hillside Conservation (HLCN) with a Floating Medium Density Residential 2/3, and a High Density Residential 1 designation. The Development Agreement establishes a framework for future residential development within the allowable density range of 8-30 units per acre, while ensuring that areas designated HLCN are preserved or improved, consistent with policies for resource protection, slope stability, visual character, and open space conservation.

The Development Agreement advances key General Plan 2045 goals and policies by:

Providing a range of housing opportunities through a framework that enables medium and highdensity residential development consistent with adopted land use designations.

Goal LU-3: Create neighborhoods that include a mix of uses and a range of housing types to meet the needs of all residents.

Policy LU-3.1: Range of Housing Types. Provide a range of housing types, sizes, and affordability levels in all Livermore neighborhoods.
804
Policy LU-3.2: Maximize Residential Density. Advance development entitlements that maintain or increase residential density, particularly in areas designated for mediumand high-density housing. Collaborate with development partners to fully utilize allowable densities to expand the housing supply, promote efficient land use, and foster walkable, transit-oriented neighborhoods.

Ensuring context-sensitive neighborhood transitions by requiring future development to be designed in relation to surrounding neighborhoods and to incorporate multimodal connections.

Goal LU-17: Cultivate the transition of new complete neighborhoods that have access to community amenities, respect the design of the surrounding area, and support multimodal transportation options.

Policy LU-17.1: Transitional Area Project Design. Require future development to design projects in context with the surrounding land uses and facilitate a mix of housing types.

Policy LU-17.2: Transitional Area Connectivity. Establish streets, trails, and pathways that improve access between neighborhoods and other destinations.

Preserving natural features and open space by maintaining protections for creek corridors, hillside areas, and scenic open space within the HLCN designated portions of the site.

Goal OS-1: Conserve the value and function of Livermore’s open space for natural resource protection, recreation, and scenic value.

Policy OS-1.1: Diverse Open Space System. Foster an open space system that supports the natural function of the land, protects sensitive wildlife and plant species, preserves important viewscapes, and creates opportunities for recreation.

Housing Element. Although the Property is not included in the 2023-2031 Housing Element Sites Inventory, the Agreement facilitates future residential development that will increase the City's overall housing capacity and may assist in meeting current or future Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) obligations. The Development Agreement identifies the compliance options consistent with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (LDC Section 11.70), with the specific approach to be finalized through an Affordable Housing Agreement. These provisions support Housing Element goals to expand affordable housing opportunities, promote mixed-income neighborhoods, and provide long-term funding for human services.

Future Neighborhood Planning and Zoning
The Property lies within a Transitional Area identified in Land Use Element, where the General Plan 2045 calls for coordinated, context-sensitive neighborhood planning (refer to General Plan Land Use Element page 3-44 and Figure LU-5). To implement this direction, the Development Agreement requires preparation and approval of a Las Colinas Neighborhood Plan and Planned Development (PD) zoning before any development may proceed. These subsequent approvals would establish detailed land use regulations, development standards, circulation networks, open space systems, and infrastructure phasing, ensuring that future development is comprehensively planned and aligned with General Plan 2045 and the Development Code.

Development Code Consistency
The Agreement complies with the Livermore Development Code by establishing permitted uses, development parameters, and a process for future discretionary approvals consistent with applicable zoning and General Plan 2045 policies.
805
Development Agreement
Government Code Section 65864, implemented locally through Livermore Development Code Chapter

9.04, authorizes cities to enter into Development Agreements to vest development rights and secure community benefits. As noted, the City Council previously directed staff to negotiate a Development Agreement with Adventus. Negotiations involved mutual concessions and incorporated City Council priorities, General Plan goals and policies, Strategic Plan pillars, and the Property Owner's development and timing considerations. The Development Agreement is provided as Attachment 7 (Exhibit B to the Ordinance), with a high-level summary of terms below.

Development Agreement Term Obligation Summary
Agreement and Duration
15-year term with extension options consistent with
the Livermore Development Code.

Subsequent Approvals
Future development requires Neighborhood Plan,
PD zoning, Tentative Map(s), Site Plan Review, and
project-level CEQA review.

Land Use and Conceptual Site Plan
Between 605-900 units within MDR 2/3 and HDR 1
areas; densities 8-30 du/ac; approx. 50 developable
acres; remaining acreage in Hillside Conservation
for open space, creek corridors, and resource
protection. Conceptual plan includes internal
streets, trails, neighborhood park, stormwater
facilities, and open space network.

Community Benefit Fund Contribution
$6 million contribution paid in three installments tied to map recordation and building permit milestones;
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers
(CPI-U) escalator applies beginning five years after
the date of agreement execution. Community
Benefit Fund contributions would be used to
support community infrastructure and amenities,
such as capital improvement projects or programs
in the Springtown area, to improve the quality of life
for residents.

Affordable Housing Strategies
Authorizing an Alternative Means of Compliance
consistent with LDC Section 11.70 through on-site
units, in-lieu fees (for-sale affordable units only),
land dedication, or an approved alternative plan.

Infrastructure Improvements
Property Owner constructs Las Colinas Road
connection, the Northern Las
Colinas Trail Extension and Southern Las Colinas
Trail Extension consistent with the Active
Transportation Plan, required off-site
improvements, and utility easements (as required).

Parkland Dedication and construction of an approximately 3- acre publicly accessible park.

Infrastructure Financing Options
City cooperation in evaluating Enhanced
Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) or a
Community Facilities District (CFD) formation to
help finance infrastructure improvements; but City
has no obligation to approve formation.
806
Impact Fee Credits
City consideration of fee credits for community
serving park or roadway improvements; may carry
forward to later phases.

The Property Owner has agreed to the terms summarized above and signed the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan 2045, secures a substantial range of community benefits, and establishes a clear framework for future development.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council determine that approval of the Development Agreement is within the scope of the General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report (General Plan EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2023030225) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and is also exempt from CEQA under the common sense exemption in Section 15061(b)(3).

The Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan 2045 land use designations for the Property and does not authorize development beyond what was evaluated in the certified General Plan EIR. Because the Agreement does not introduce new or more severe environmental effects and no conditions requiring supplemental review under CEQA Guidelines Section15183 are present, it is within the scope of the General Plan EIR. Furthermore, the Development Agreement establishes procedural requirements and vested rights for future discretionary approvals, all of which will undergo separate CEQA review when submitted. Because the Development Agreement does not grant new development rights, change development intensity, or modify the land use assumptions already evaluated in the General Plan 2045 Program EIR, it cannot result in any physical environmental effects. As an administrative action with no potential to cause a significant impact, the Development Agreement qualifies for the common sense exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

PLANNING COMMISSION
On July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Development Agreement, related CEQA determination, public testimony, and required findings (see meeting minutes are provided as Attachment 2). There were three public comments received at the hearing on this item; two related to traffic concerns and neighborhood impacts with a future project and one from a labor organization representative. The Planning Commission adopted resolutions recommending that the City Council find the Development Agreement exempt from CEQA (Attachment 4) and adopt an ordinance approving the Development Agreement (Attachment 6).

FISCAL AND ADMINSTRATIVE IMPACTS
Approval of the Development Agreement would not result in a direct cost to the City. The Development Agreement application fees paid by Adventus generally cover the City’s administrative costs associated with processing the application, including staff time for negotiation, analysis, and document preparation.

The Development Agreement would provide $6,000,000 in Community Benefit Fund contributions, with payments to be made in phases tied to subsequent project approvals and associated ministerial actions, including final map recordation and building permit issuance. Future development under the Development Agreement would be subject to required development impact fees. The Development Agreement also provides infrastructure financing options and impact fee credit provisions, subject to the 807
City’s determination that any proposed improvements benefit the broader community beyond the development area. Development under the Development Agreement could help maintain long term fiscal balance, with service expenditures likely offset by increased property tax revenue depending on the ultimate development outcomes.

COMMUNITY PILLAR

1. A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL

9. Facilitate new development consistent with the City's General Plan

GUIDING DOCUMENTS
General Plan 2045
Livermore Municipal Code
Livermore Development Code

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location Map

2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 7, 2026

3. Resolution CEQA

4. Exhibit A PC Resolution 15-26 CEQA

5. Ordinance Development Agreement

6. Exhibit A PC Resolution 16-26 Development Agreement

7. Exhibit B Development Agreement
Prepared by: Shannon Pagan
Senior Planner
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Kristen Hilton
Acting Administrative Services Director
808
City of Livermore
This map is based on City of Livermore GIS
Information and reflects the most current information
at the time of this printing. The map is intended for
reference purposes only and the City and its staff is
not responsible for errors. 16,000 Livermore IT, GIS Services 2,666.7
1: NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US 1,333.33 Feet 0 2,666.7
1/14/2025
12:18:42 AM
Prepared:

Notes:

Scale:

ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT SITE:
3658 LAS COLINAS ROAD
APN: 902-8-1
122 ACRES
809
JULY 7, 2026 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

DRAFT MINUTES

PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 7, 2026
________________________________________________________________

REGULAR MEETING

1. CALL TO ORDER – The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Tracy Kronzak at 7:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ROLL CALL – Present: Chairperson Tracy Kronzak, Vice Chairperson Charity Steele, Commissioner Jacob Anderson, Commissioner Yolanda Fintschenko, Commissioner Nadine Horner.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Kronzak led the Pledge of Allegiance.

2. OPEN FORUM
Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

Greg Scott addressed the Commission regarding the inclusion of UC Berkley and UC Davis in the Land Grant Colleges; water crisis; and growth predictions in the General Plan update.

There were no more speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER ANDERSON, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FINTSCHENKO, AND CARRIED ON A 4-0 VOTE (WITH

COMMISSIONER HORNER ABSTAINING), THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3.1:

3.1 Approval of the June 16, 2026 Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

4. PROJECT REVIEW - NONE
ATTACHMENT 2
810
PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JULY 7, 2026

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS

5.1 Hearing to consider a resolution recommending certification of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, approval of the Livermore General Plan 2045, and approval of conforming Zoning Map Amendments establishing a long-term vision, goals, policies, implementation actions and land use designations to guide future decision-making related to growth, development, and resource conservation through 2045.

Recommendation:

Staff recommend the Planning Commission adopt separate resolutions recommending the City Council:
• Certify the General Plan 2045 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Adopt Livermore General Plan 2045, subject to the revisions identified in the Errata Sheet dated July 7, 2026 (GPA 21-003)
• Adopt an ordinance making conforming amendments to the Livermore Zoning Map (ZMA 26-001)
• Retain Existing General Plan Scenic Corridor Policy (under separate cover) until new Scenic Resources policies are considered at a future date (POL 26-002).

Andy Ross, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.

Chairperson Kronzak clarified the difference between a programmatic EIR and mitigation measures established in a project specific EIR; purpose of a neighborhood plan; and contemplated update for the Climate Action Plan.

Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Commissioner Anderson commended staff for their work on the update; highlighted the theme of making housing changes while updating the framework to accommodate those changes, therefore establishing less than significant impacts; and expressed enthusiasm and appreciation.

Commissioner Horner echoed appreciation to staff and the community and noted that plans worked.

Commissioner Fintschenko echoed the gratitude expressed by the other Commissioners.

Vice Chair Steele thanked staff for the thorough review and clear presentation; and the community for its input.

Chairperson Kronzak expressed gratitude to staff and the community; and acknowledged the compassionate, visionary, adaptive and inclusionary outcome.

ATTACHMENT 2
811
JULY 7, 2026 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

ON THE MOTION OF CHAIRPERSON KRONZAK, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 11-26 Recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan 2045 and Zoning Map Amendment and Adopt California Environmental Quality Act Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Resolution 12-26 Recommending that the City Council approve Livermore General Plan 2045.

Resolution 13-26 Recommending that the City Council Adopt an Ordinance Approving Zoning Map Amendment 26-001 to conform with the General Plan 2045.

Resolution 14-26 Recommending approval of Policy Proposal (POL) 26-002 for the Scenic Resources Policy to implement the General Plan 2045 Community Identity Element.

5.2 Hearing to consider an ordinance authorizing Development Agreement 24- 004 to establish a framework and secure vested rights for a future residential project on approximately 50 developable acres within a 122-acre property at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Assessor Parcel Number 902-8-1). The Development Agreement does not propose or authorize a specific development project or physical development, and future implementation actions would be subject to subsequent approvals.

Recommendation:

Staff recommend the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions recommending the City Council:

1. Find that the Development Agreement is within the scope of the certified General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 and that the Agreement itself has no potential to cause a significant environmental effect and is therefore exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). No additional environmental review is required;

2. Adopt an Ordinance authorizing Development Agreement (DA) 24-004.

Shannon Pagan, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.

Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

Paul Bongiovanni, Adventus, congratulated the City on the General Plan; thanked the Commission for its consideration of the Development Agreement; and explained the significant infill property, and proceeds from the sale as part of planned reorganization to the Diocese.

ATTACHMENT 2
812
PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JULY 7, 2026
Chairperson Kronzak confirmed that the project would be covered by a future scenic overlay; and an Neighborhood Plan with Planned Development Zoning to ensure compatibility with the existing neighborhood.

Greg Scott expressed concern with destroying the last remaining scenic corridor and impacting sacred ground; the need to rebuild the Las Collinas overpass; and housing crisis.

William Vidalin, 3680 Las Colinas Road, expressed concern about the impact to their family ranch due to traffic; misaligned overpass; and need for two bridges.

Ian Vidalin, 3680 Las Colinas Road, expressed concern with encroachment and traffic with adjacent developments and the need for County officials to inspect the County parcel and conduct a rigorous traffic study; and provided copies of the property boundaries survey to the Planning Commission clerk.

Robert Downs, East Bay Residents for Responsible Development, representing the building trades organizations, referenced their July 6, 2026, letter; indicated support for the development; and requested inclusion of workforce standards in the Development Agreement.

There were no additional speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Commissioner Anderson confirmed that neighborhood compatibility and technical studies would be considered during site plan and design review; that the Development Agreement was part of an exchange and would provide better connectivity for Springtown, trail completions, contributions to the Community Benefit Fund; and discussed the use of workforce labor.

Commissioner Horner thanked staff and Diocese; discussed the give and take in the agreement; desire for the Diocese to build the high school on an alternate site in Livermore; and belief that the future project would consider the concerns of community.

Commissioner Fintschenko thanked staff and the applicant; and discussed the neighbors’ concerns. Senior Planner Pagan explained that, before any development could occur on the subject property, the parcel would first need to be sold, and a development proposal submitted by a future developer. The proposal would then be reviewed through the entitlement process, including preparation of a Neighborhood Plan with Planned Development zoning, subdivision mapping, and site plan design review. In addition, the necessary technical studies and site-specific environmental analysis would also be completed concurrently with these entitlement steps. Commissioner Fintschenko reviewed the requested actions before the Planning Commission and opportunities for community input.

Vice Chair Steele expressed appreciation for staff’s presentation and acknowledged the public’s concerns.

ATTACHMENT 2
813
JULY 7, 2026 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION
In response to Chairperson Kronzak, Senior Planner Pagan and Principal Planner Ross explained the requirements under CEQA to notify the Tribe and comments received; and the neighborhood notification and outreach process.

In response to Commissioner Fintschenko, Principal Planner Ross explained the use of Community Benefit Funds.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER HORNER, SECONDED BY VICE
CHAIRPERSON STEELE AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS:

Resolution 15-26 Recommending the City Council find that the Development Agreement 24-004 for the Adventus Las Colinas Road Property is within the scope of the General Plan 2045 Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 and Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3).

Resolution 16-26 Recommending that the City Council Adopt an Ordinance Approving Development Agreement 24-004 for the Adventus Las Colinas Road Property.

RECESS
Chairperson Kronzak called a recess at 8:25 pm. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 pm with all Commissioners present.

5.3 Hearing to consider a request for the first amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 (“Agreement”) with McGrath RentCorp (DAA 26-002).

The Agreement term would be extended 30 years to 2059, the Agreement boundary would be adjusted, and the Property Owner obligations would be modified to: 1) effectuate a commercial land transfer to a high-revenue commercial user; and 2) secure support for 2045 General Plan and Midtown Area planning objectives.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions recommending the City Council:

1. Find that the first amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 with McGrath RentCorp is exempt under CEQA; and

2. Adopt an Ordinance to approve the first amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 with McGrath RentCorp (DAA 26-002).

Jake Potter, Economic Development Manager, presented the staff report.

Mike Bray, McGrath RentCorp, discussed the existing property and use and requested amendment to allow continued operations.

Chairperson Kronzak opened the public comment period.

ATTACHMENT 2
814
PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes JULY 7, 2026
There were no speakers, and the public comment period was closed.

Commissioner Anderson suggested the proposed amendment is the best outcome considering the circumstances.

Commissioner Horner thanked the owners for coming and acknowledged that housing would be ideal but the business had been in operation for decades.

Commissioner Fintschenko thanked staff and the applicant and indicated the findings could be made.

Vice Chair Steele thanked the City and applicant for coming to the compromise and indicated support for the recommendations.

Chairperson Kronzak expressed appreciation and indicated the findings could be made.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER HORNER, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FINTSCHENKO AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION:

Resolution 17-26 Recommending the City Council find that the First Amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 (DAA 26-002) with Mcgrath RentCorp is Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 And 15061(B)(3).

Resolution 18-26 Recommending that the City Council Adopt an Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to Development Agreement 08-002 (DAA 26-002) with McGrath RentCorp.

6. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION - NONE

7. MATTERS INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF - NONE

8. ADJOURNMENT – at 8:47 pm to a Regular Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, July 21, 2026 at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Avenue.

ATTACHMENT 2
815
1 RESOLUTION NO.

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 24-004 FOR THE

ADVENTUS LAS COLINAS ROAD PROPERTY IS EXEMPT FROM THE

PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(Development Agreement 24-004)
The City received an application for Development Agreement (DA) 24-004 from Adventus, the Property Owner of a 122‑acre parcel located at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Assessor Parcel Number 902‑8‑1) (“Property”), to establish a framework and secure vested rights for future residential uses consistent with the land use designations and policies of General Plan 2045 (“Agreement” or “Project”). The Agreement does not propose or authorize a specific development project or physical development; future development will require subsequent discretionary approvals.

On June 26, 2026, the City published the General Plan 2045 Final Environmental Impact Report (“General Plan EIR”) (State Clearinghouse No. 2023030225), a Program EIR prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines. The General Plan EIR evaluates the long‑term buildout under updated land use designations, policies, and growth assumptions of General Plan 2045.

The General Plan EIR analyzes the maximum development intensity and associated environmental effects anticipated for the Property under its General Plan 2045 land use designations and serves as the environmental foundation for subsequent implementing actions.

On July 7, 2026, as a separate agenda item from this Agreement, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider its recommendation on the General Plan EIR to the City Council and adopted Resolution No. 11-26, recommending that the City Council certify the General Plan EIR and adopt associated Findings, Facts in Support of Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

At the same duly noticed public hearing held on July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the Project, made the necessary findings, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending the City Council find the Project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15183 and 15061(b)(3).

On July 27, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution XX-XX to certify the General Plan EIR and adopt the Findings, Facts in Support of Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations Regarding the Environmental Impact Report.

On July 27, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, and all public comments and testimony, and findings.
816
2 RESOLUTION NO.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this resolution. Based upon the City Council's own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby finds that the Project is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, as the Project falls within the scope of analysis conducted for the General Plan 2045 EIR and does not authorize any level of development or activity beyond what that document evaluated.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore, based upon the City Council's own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, hereby finds that the Project is exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption) in that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Exemption with the Alameda County Clerk, if the Project is approved.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore, California. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption by the City Council. 817
3 RESOLUTION NO.

On motion of Council Member ____________________, seconded by Council Member __________, the foregoing resolution was passed
and adopted on July 27, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Helena Graves Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-26
818

EXHIBIT A
819

EXHIBIT A
820

EXHIBIT A
821

EXHIBIT A
822
1 ORDINANCE NO.

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH

ADVENTUS FOR THE LAS COLINAS ROAD PROPERTY
(Development Agreement 24-004)
California Government Code Section 65864 (implemented by Livermore Development Code Chapter 9.04) allows local jurisdictions and private parties to enter into Development Agreements in order to vest certain development rights and to meet local public purpose objectives.

On December 9, 2024, Adventus, as the Property Owner of a 122‑acre parcel located at 3658 Las Colinas Road (Assessor Parcel Number 902‑8‑1) (“Property”), submitted an application for Development Agreement 24‑004 to establish a framework and secure vested rights for future residential uses on a defined portion of the Property consistent with the General Plan 2045 land use designations (“Agreement” or “Project”).

The Agreement does not propose or authorize a specific development project or physical development; future development will require subsequent discretionary approvals.

On February 24, 2025, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing City staff to negotiate the Agreement concurrently with the General Plan 2045 update to ensure that the Agreement would function as an implementing mechanism of General Plan 2045 and to secure benefits for the community.

Following this direction, City staff and Adventus negotiated the Agreement, attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The Agreement does not propose or authorize a specific development project or physical development; rather, it establishes procedures and vested rights for future residential development on approximately 50 developable acres of the 122‑acre Property, allowing between 605–900 dwelling units with related park, open space, circulation, and infrastructure improvements. The Agreement includes the Property's legal description, a conceptual site plan, and infrastructure exhibits that illustrate the Property's development potential, but do not authorize physical development or establish final design. The remaining acreage is not authorized for residential use and may be improved or preserved as authorized by this Agreement, the General Plan, and subsequent discretionary approvals, including adoption of a Neighborhood Plan and Planned Development zoning, subject to all applicable review and approval processes.

On July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Agreement, staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending the City Council approve the Agreement. The Planning Commission additionally adopted Resolution No. 15-26 recommending the City Council find the Agreement exempt from CEQA.
823
2 ORDINANCE NO.

On July 27, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Agreement, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Authority. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq., the City Council considers that certain document under City Application No. Development Agreement 24-004 and entitled “Development Agreement for the Las Colinas Road Property” (“Development Agreement”). The Development Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Section 2. Record Evidence. Prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the City of Livermore reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony; and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Ordinance by reference.

Section 3. Environmental. The City Council has adopted Resolution No. ____, finding the Development Agreement for the Las Colinas Road Property to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15183 and 15061(b)(3). The Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan 2045 land use designation applicable to the Property and does not authorize development beyond what was evaluated in the Livermore General Plan 2045 EIR (General Plan EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2023030225). The General Plan EIR serves as the applicable environmental document for the Development Agreement under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Further, the Development Agreement does not authorize physical development, construction activity, or site disturbance, and it qualifies for the common sense exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Section 4. Findings. The City Council has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-26, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them herein as their own.

Section 5. Approval. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, it hereby adopts this Ordinance approving the Development Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B. The City Council recommends any future developer of the Las Colinas Road Property engage with relevant labor organizations, as appropriate, in connection with the planning, construction, and facilitation of site development.

Section 6. Signing Authority. The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Development Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B, on behalf of the City of Livermore.

Section 7. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Livermore within 15 days after its adoption. 824
3 ORDINANCE NO.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption.

Section 9. Recording. The City Clerk is directed to record the Development Agreement within 10 days after the effective date of the Development Agreement.

Section 10. Documents. The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based on can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, California.

Section 11. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any remaining parts.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Livermore held on July 27, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The Ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council held on , by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mayor, City of Livermore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Helena Graves Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution 16-26
Exhibit B – Development Agreement 24-004
825

EXHIBIT A
826

EXHIBIT A
827

EXHIBIT A
828

EXHIBIT A
829

EXHIBIT A
830

EXHIBIT B
831

EXHIBIT B
832

EXHIBIT B
833

EXHIBIT B
834

EXHIBIT B
835

EXHIBIT B
836

EXHIBIT B
837

EXHIBIT B
838

EXHIBIT B
839

EXHIBIT B
840

EXHIBIT B
841

EXHIBIT B
842

EXHIBIT B
843

EXHIBIT B
844

EXHIBIT B
845