Lodi City Council
July 20, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.

FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.

________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer
City Manager

________________________________
Janice D. Magdich
City Attorney

AGENDA ITEM G-01

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPROVED: _______________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
\\cvcfilv02\pubwks$\WP\DEV_SERV\LandscapeDistrict\FY 2022-23 Engineer's Report\CC-072022-PH_2022AnnualReport.doc 7/5/2022 AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Resolution Adopting Final Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for Lodi Consolidated Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2003-1, Fiscal Year 2022/23; and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments M
EETING DATE: July 20, 2022
P
REPARED BY: Public Works Director
RE
COMMENDED ACTION: P ublic hearing to consider resolution adopting Final Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for Lodi Consolidated Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2003-1, Fiscal Year 2022/23; and ordering
the levy and collection of assessments.

B
ACKGROUND INFORMATION: Over the past 19 years, the City Council has formed a total of 16 zones of the Lodi Consolidated Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2003-1 (District). The scope of maintenance activities funded by the District includes landscape and irrigation, masonry block walls, and street parkway trees. The activities and levy amounts vary by zone, as described in the City of Lodi, Consolidated Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2003-1, Annual Report (Report), Fiscal Year 2022/23.

T
he Report includes diagrams of the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; an assessment of the estimated costs of maintenance, operations and servicing of improvements; and the net levy upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District.

T
he cost of maintenance increased slightly compared to last year; however, it is still more than the amount being assessed to the district. Similar to last year, the account has a substantial reserve, generated over many years, which will be utilized to allow the individual zone and the total District’s assessment for Fiscal Year 2022/23 to remain unchanged from Fiscal Year 2021/22. Staff intends to utilize the reserve to offset annual increases until such time that the reserve is reduced to an appropriate level. At that time, the assessment will be adjusted as necessary.

T
he individual zone assessments range from $18 to $55 per Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE). The assessments per DUE vary because the specific improvements maintained in each zone are different. The average assessment per DUE is $44.

T
he District’s Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget is provided in Exhibit A. The Engineers Report is provided in Exhibit B.

F
ISCAL IMPACT: F unding for District maintenance and the preparation of the Report are included in the assessments. The General Fund will contribute $703.66 this year to account for maintenance costs that do not exclusively benefit the District.

Public Hearing to Consider Resolution Adopting Final Engineer’s Annual Levy Repor t for Lodi Consolidated Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2003-1, Fiscal Year 2022/23; and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments July 20, 2022

\\cvcfilv02\pubwks$\WP\DEV_SERV\LandscapeDistrict\FY 2022-23 Engineer's Report\CC-072022-PH_2022AnnualReport.doc 7/5/2022

FUNDING AVAILABLE: Funding is available to continue the existing level of maintenance in the District.

This funding is being provided from the current assessment and from existing District reserves.

_______________________________
Charles E. Swimley, Jr.

Public Works Director

Prepared by Sean Nathan, Senior Civil Engineer
CES/SN/cd
Attachments

cc: City Engineer
NBS

Exhibit A
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget

nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516

Engineer’s Report For: Fiscal Year 2022/23
Consolidated Landscape Maintenance District
No. 2003-1

May 202 2

CITY OF LODI
CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2003-1

221 W. Pine Street
Lodi, California 95240
Phone - (209) 333-6800
Fax - (209) 333-6710

CITY COUNCIL
Mark Chandler, Mayor
Mikey Hothi, Mayor Pro Tempore
Alan Nakanishi, Council Member
Doug Kuehne, Council Member
Shak Khan, Council Member

CITY STAFF
Steve Schwabauer, City Manager
Pamela Farris, Assistant City Clerk
Janice D. Magdich, City Attorney
Charles Swimley Jr., Public Works Director

NBS
Tim Seufert, Client Services Director
Darrylanne Zarate, Project Manager
Christine Drazil, Financial Analyst

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Engineer’s Letter .................................................................................... ......................... 1 Overview ............................................................................................. ........................... 3

2.1 District Formation and Annexation History ............................................................ 3

2.2 Effect of Proposition 218 ......................................................................................... 4 Plans and Specifications ............................................................................. ..................... 5 Benefits ............................................................................................. ............................. 8

4.1 Masonry Wall Maintenance .................................................................................... 8

4.2 Landscape Maintenance ......................................................................................... 8

4.3 Street Parkway Trees Maintenance ........................................................................ 8 Quantification of General Benefit .................................................................... ............. 10

5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 10

5.2 Separation of General Benefit ............................................................................... 10

5.3 Masonry Wall Maintenance .................................................................................. 11

5.4 Landscape Maintenance ....................................................................................... 14

5.5 Street Parkway Trees Maintenance ...................................................................... 17

5.6 Collective General Benefit ..................................................................................... 18 Assessment Methodology ............................................................................... .............. 19

6.1 Benefit Points ........................................................................................................ 19

6.2 Benefit Factor ........................................................................................................ 20

6.3 Benefit Units .......................................................................................................... 20

6.4 Assessment Rate Per Benefit Unit ......................................................................... 21

6.5 Adjustments to Maximum Assessments ............................................................... 21 Estimate of Costs .................................................................................... ...................... 24

7.1 Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/23 ............................................................................. 24

7.2 Assessment Rate Per DUE ..................................................................................... 25 Assessment Diagrams .................................................................................. ................. 26 Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll .................................................................. ........... 27

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 1 ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS , on May 18, 2022, the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Lodi (the “City”), pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution initiating proceeding for the levy and collection of assessments for the Lodi Consolidated Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 (the “District”), Fiscal Year 2022/23;
WHEREAS , said resolution ordered NBS to prepare and file a report, in accordance with §22567 of the Act, concerning the assessment of the estimated costs of operating, maintaining, and servicing the improvements within the District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023.

NOW THEREFORE , the following assessments are made to finance the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements within the District:

DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
Zone 1 - Total Assessment $4,075.92
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 74.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $55.08

Zone 2 - Total Assessment $7,325.64
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 133.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $55.08

Zone 3 - Total Assessment $716.04
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 39.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $18.36

Zone 4 - Total Assessment $624.24
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 34.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $18.36

Zone 5 - Total Assessment $12,282.84
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 223.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $55.08

Zone 6 - Total Assessment $4,406.40
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 80.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $55.08

Zone 8 - Total Assessment $936.36
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 17.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $55.08

Zone 9 - Total Assessment $201.96
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 11.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $18.36

(Continued on next page)

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 2

DESCRIPTION AMOUNT

Charles Swimley, P.E., Engineer of Work

Date Seal
Zone 11 - Total Assessment $440.64
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 8.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $55.08

Zone 13 - Total Assessment $1,709.34
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 93.104
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $18.36

Zone 14 - Total Assessment $587.52
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 16.000
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $36.72

Zone 15 - Total Assessment $665.8 4
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 36.268
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $18.36

Zone 16 - Total Assessment $153.48
Dwelling Unit Equivalents 8.360
Assessment per Dwelling Unit Equivalent $18.36
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit this report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the assessments and assessment diagrams herein have been computed and prepared in accordance with the order of the Council.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 3

OVERVIEW
This report describes the District and details the assessments to be levied against the parcels therein for Fiscal Year 2022/23. Such assessments account for all estimated direct and incidental expenses, deficits/surpluses, revenues, and reserves associated with the operation, servicing, and maintenance of the improvements.

2.1 District Formation and Annexation History
The District is currently comprised of 13 distinct zones within the City. New zones may be annexed into the District if approved via property owner balloting proceedings.

ZONES 1 AND 2
A report was prepared in 2003 for Zones 1 and 2. Property owner balloting proceedings were conducted, effective for the Fiscal Year 2004/05 assessment. After attaining property owner approval, the City began levying and collecting these assessments on the County Tax Roll in order to provide continuous funding for the related improvements.

ZONES 3 THROUGH 6
In 2004, separate reports were prepared for Zones 3 through 6. Property owner balloting proceedings were conducted within Zones 3 and 4 for the Fiscal Year 2004/05 assessment and within Zones 5 through 7 for the Fiscal Year 2005/06 assessment. After attaining property owner approval, the City began levying and collecting these assessments on the County Tax Roll in order to provide continuous funding for the related improvements.

ZONES 8, 9, AND 11
A separate report was prepared in 2005 for Zones 8, 9, and 11. Property owner balloting proceedings were conducted for the Fiscal Year 2005/06 assessment. After attaining property owner approval, the City began levying and collecting these assessments on the County Tax Roll in order to provide continuous funding for the related improvements.

ZONE 13
A separate engineer’s report was prepared in 2007 for Zone 13. Property owner balloting proceedings were conducted for the Fiscal Year 2007/08 assessment. After attaining property owner approval, the City began levying and collecting these assessments on the County Tax Roll in order to provide continuous funding for the related improvements.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this report, refers to an individual property that has been assigned an Assessor’s Parcel Number by the San Joaquin County ("the County") Assessor. The County Auditor- Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Tax Codes to identify the parcels assessed on the County Tax Roll within special benefit districts.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 4

ZONES 14 THROUGH 16
A separate engineer’s report was prepared in 2008 for Zones 14 through 16. Property owner balloting proceedings were conducted for the Fiscal Year 2008/09 assessment. After attaining property owner approval, the City began levying and collecting these assessments on the County Tax Roll in order to provide continuous funding for the related improvements.

2.2 Effect of Proposition 218
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 (Government Code commencing with Section 53739) by a margin of 56.5% to 43.5%. The provisions of the Proposition, now a part of the California Constitution, add substantive and procedural requirements to assessments, which affect the City’s landscape maintenance assessments.

The Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 5

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities operated, serviced, and maintained within each Zone are generally described as follows:

ZONE 1 – ALMONDWOOD ESTATES

1. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping area along the east side of Stockton Street from the project’s north boundary to Almond Drive, including the angled corner section at Elgin Avenue, approximately 1,220 linear feet.

2. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping area along the north side of Almond Drive from the project’s east boundary westerly to Stockton Street, including the angled corner sections at Blackbird Place and Stockton Street, approximately 340 linear feet.

3. Street parkway trees located within the public street within the Zone 1 boundary.

ZONE 2 – CENTURY MEADOWS ONE, UNITS 2 & 3

1. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping area a long the north side of Harney Lane from the project’s east boundary to the west boundary, including the 2 angled corner sections at Poppy Drive, approximately 1,200 linear feet.

2. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 2 boundary.

ZONE 3 – MILLSBRIDGE II

1. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 3 boundary.

ZONE 4 – ALMOND NORTH

1. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 4 boundary.

ZONE 5 – LEGACY ESTATES I & II AND KIRST ESTATES
Legacy Estates I

1. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping strip, divided by a 4-foot wide meandering sidewalk, along the north side of Harney Lane at the back of lots 10-24 of Legacy Estates I, approximately 950 linear feet.

2. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 5 boundary.

Legacy Estates II

1. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping strip, divided by a 4-foot wide meandering sidewalk, along the west side of Mills Avenue from the project’s southern boundary on Mills Avenue to the intersection of Wyndham Way, approximately 590 linear feet.

2. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping strip, divided by a 4-foot wide meandering sidewalk, along the north side of Harney Lane at the back of lots 69-77 of Legacy Estates II, approximately 525 linear feet.

3. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 5 boundary.

Kirst Estates

1. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 5 boundary.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 6 ZONE 6 – THE VILLAS

1. A masonry wall and 8.5’ wide landscaping area al ong the east side of Panzani Way from the project’s south boundary to the intersection of Porta Rosa Drive, approximately 120 linear feet.

2. A masonry wall and 27.5 to 43.0-foot variable wi dth landscaping strip, divided by a 4.0-foot wide meandering sidewalk, along the north side of Harney Lane from Panzani Way to the frontage road, approximately 425 linear feet.

3. A masonry wall and 15.0 to 44.0-foot variable wi dth landscaping strip, divided by a 4.0-foot wide meandering sidewalk, along the west of the frontage road and the east side of San Martino Way from Harney Lane to the project’s north boundary, approximately 700 linear feet.

4. Parcel B, between lots 1 and 50, a variable widt h landscaping strip, approximately 250 linear feet.

5. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet within the Zone 6 boundary.

ZONE 8 – VINTAGE OAKS

1. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping strip, including a 4.0-foot wide sidewalk, extending north and south of the future Vintage Oaks Court along the east side of S. Lower Sacramento Road for a total distance of approximately 252 linear feet.

2. A 9.5’ wide landscaping strip in the east half o f the Lower Sacramento Road median, west of the Zone 8 boundary.

3. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet (Vintage Oaks Court) within the Zone 8 boundary.

ZONE 9 – INTERLAKE SQUARE

1. Street parkway trees located within the public r ights-of-way of School Street and Park Street within the Zone 9 boundary.

ZONE 11 – TATE PROPERTY

1. A masonry wall and 13.5’ wide landscaping strip, divided by a 4.0-foot wide meandering sidewalk, along the north side of Harney Lane, immediately east of Legacy Way, approximately 140 linear feet.

2. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet (Legacy Way) within the Zone 11 boundary.

ZONE 13 – GUILD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL

1. A 15.0 foot irrigated, landscaped strip in a 16. 0 foot median in Victor Road (Highway 12) south of the Zone 13 boundary, extending west from the current City limits for a distance of 700 feet.

2. A 28.5 foot irrigated landscape strip on the nor th side of Victor Road (Highway 12), extending westerly from the current City limits to 231 feet west of the Guild Avenue intersection centerline and having a total length of 1,485 feet.

ZONE 14 – LUCA PLACE

1. A 6.5-foot irrigated landscape strip in the east half of the Westgate Drive median, west of the Zone 14 boundary.

2. Street parkway trees located within the public s treet (Westgate Drive), within the Zone 14 boundary.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 7 ZONE 15 – GUILD AVENUE INDUSTRIAL

1. A 15.0 foot irrigated, landscaped strip in a 16. 0 foot median in Victor Road (Highway 12) south of the Zone 15 boundary, extending west from the current City limits for a distance of 700 feet.

2. A 28.5 foot irrigated landscape strip on the nor th side of Victor Road (Highway 12), extending westerly from the current City limits to 231 feet west of the Guild Avenue intersection centerline and having a total length of 1,485 feet.

ZONE 16 – WEST KETTLEMAN LANE COMMERCIAL

1. A variable width (15 to 18 feet) irrigated, land scaped strip in the segmented median in W. Kettleman Lane (Highway 12) extending west from Ham Lane to Westgate Drive and having a total landscaped area of 36,505 square feet.

2. A variable width (12 to 20 feet) irrigated lands cape strip in the segmented median in Lower Sacramento Road extending south from the north boundary of parcel APN 027-410-06 (2429 W. Kettleman Lane) to the south boundary of APN 058-030-13 (1551 S. Lower Sacramento Road) and having a total landscaped area of 13,490 square feet.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 8

BENEFITS
The special benefits conferred from the installation and maintenance of the improvements need to be identified. The improvements shown in Section 3 are, hereby, reasonably determined to confer certain special benefits to parcels within each applicable Zone, and such special benefits are described below.

4.1 Masonry Wall Maintenance
The overall appeal of an area is enhanced when neighborhood masonry wall improvements are in place and kept in satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal decreases when such walls are deteriorating, damaged, unsafe or defaced by graffiti.

4.1.1 IMPROVED AESTHETICS
Neighborhood masonry walls, when coupled with landscaping improvements, improve the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within each applicable Zone. Such walls also create a sense of community within the applicable Zones. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity, and attract residents and visitors to the community.

4.2 Landscape Maintenance
The overall appeal of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal decreases when landscaping is overgrown, unsafe, or destroyed by the elements or vandalism.

4.2.1 IMPROVED AESTHETICS
Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance, and desirability for properties within each applicable Zone. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within each applicable Zone. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity, and attract residents and visitors to the community.

4.3 Street Parkway Trees Maintenance
The overall appeal of an area is enhanced when street parkway trees improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal decreases when street parkway trees are overgrown, unsafe, or destroyed by the elements or vandalism.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 9

4.3.1 IMPROVED AESTHETICS
Much like street landscaping improvements, maintenance of street parkway trees improves the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within each applicable Zone. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within each applicable Zone. According to the Urban Forestry Network, trees add beauty to their surroundings by adding color to an area, softening harsh lines of buildings, screening unsightly views, and contributing to the character of their environment.

Trees have also proven to contribute to a community’s economy and way of life. Trees planted along and around buildings provide a distraction for the eye, softening the background. Trees also contribute eye- catching colors to their surroundings, from the different shades of green found in the leaves, the colors found in flowering trees, and sometimes even the bark of the tree.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 10

QUANTIFICATION OF GENERAL BENEFIT

5.1 Introduction
Pursuant to Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the improvements shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire cost of the improvements. Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements necessary or convenient for providing certain public services.

Section 22573 of the Act requires that assessments must be levied according to benefit received rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit. Furthermore, it’s required that the City separate the general benefits from special benefits, because only special benefits may be assessed to property owners.

5.2 Separation of General Benefit
Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them, the local agency must next “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,” and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.

General benefit is an overall and similar benefit to the public at large resulting from the improvements and services to be provided. The District improvements and maintenance services, which are more fully presented in Section 3 of this Report, will only be provided within the boundaries of each Zone. There will be no improvements or maintenance services provided by the District outside of the boundaries of each Zone.

The improvements provide aesthetic benefits to the properties within the various Zones of the District.

However, it’s recognized that the maintenance of the improvements also provides a level of benefit to some property and businesses within close proximity to the District, as well as visitors and individuals passing through the District. Vehicular traffic and pedestrians passing through the various Zones will be able to enjoy the improvements and maintenance services. Therefore, it is necessary to quantify these general benefits.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 11

5.3 Masonry Wall Maintenance
One method for determining the general aesthetic benefit conferred by the maintenance of the various neighborhood masonry walls is to compare the estimated time spent by occupants in vehicles and pedestrians traversing the improvements (general) to the estimated time spent by the population of the various Zones in close proximity to the improvements (special). Estimated time for these purposes will be referred to as “population-hours”, i.e., number of accumulated hours per day attributed to people in and around the area of the improvements. For purposes of this calculation, we will assign 24 hours to the estimated number of persons residing within each Zone.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2014), the average household size in the City is 2.82 persons. The following shows the number of residential units, the estimated persons, and the total population-hours of each Zone benefitting from masonry wall maintenance:

Zone
Number of
Residential
Units
Estimated
Number of
Persons 1
Population-
Hours (Special) 2
1 74 209 5,008.32
2 133 375 9,001.44
5 223 629 15,092.64
6 80 226 5,414.40
8 17 48 1,150.56
11 8 23 541.44
TOTAL 535 1,510 36,208.80
1 Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.
2 Estimated Number of Persons multiplied by 24 (hours).

We now need to estimate the population-hours generated by occupants in vehicles passing by the masonry wall improvements throughout the District. Any vehicle using the City’s streets that lie along the boundaries of the District that is coming or going to a parcel within the District ultimately is not part of the “general public” benefitting from the improvements and services, and will not be included in the calculation of general benefit. We will use several factors for such calculation, including average daily vehicle trips for the streets passing by the improvements of each Zone, the speed limit of those streets, the length of the improvements, and the estimated number of occupants per vehicle.

According to data from the U.S. Department of Transportation (2011), the weighted average number of occupants per vehicle is 1.674. The following table shows the average number of occupants for each mode of vehicular transportation, the percentage of each mode of vehicular transportation, and the overall weighted average occupancy per vehicle:

Mode Occupants
Percentage of
All Vehicles
Weighted
Occupancy
Car 1.59 50.6% 0.804
Van 2.35 7.9% 0.187
Sport Utility 1.92 17.9% 0.344
Pickup 1.49 19.9% 0.296
Other Truck 1.12 0.4% 0.004
Motorcycle 1.18 3.3% 0.039
Weighted Average Vehicle Occupancy 1.674

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 12 Using the weighted average vehicle occupancy number determined above, we can estimate the number of vehicle occupants passing by the improvements each day. We then multiply the time it takes to traverse the improvements at the given speed limit by the number of estimated vehicle occupants to derive population-hours for vehicular traffic.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 13 The following table summarizes the calculation of population-hours for vehicle occupants passing by the masonry wall improvements, based upon the methodology and assumptions above:

Zone Street
Speed
Limit
Length of
Imp. (mi)
Time
Passing
Imp. (hr)
Average Daily
Vehicle Trips 1
Estimated
Vehicle
Occupants 2
Population-
Hours (General)
1 Stockton St. 40 MPH 0.231 0.0058 10,052 16,827 97.06 Almond Dr. 30 MPH 0.065 0.0022 3,170 5,307 11.56
2 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.226 0.0050 8,439 14,128 70.87 5 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.310 0.0069 5,457 9,136 62.88 Mills Ave. 30 MPH 0.113 0.0038 2,559 4,284 16.16
6 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.081 0.0018 11,115 18,608 33.43 Cherokee Ln. 45 MPH 0.126 0.0028 3,439 5,757 16.15
8 L. Sac. Rd. 50 MPH 0.047 0.0009 14,575 24,400 22.70 11 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.028 0.0006 6,891 11,536 7.16 TOTAL POPULATION-HOURS (VEHICLE OCCUPANTS) 337.97
1 Data provided by the City; adjusted to remove estimated average daily vehicle trips generated by the parcels within each Zone, based upon data compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (7 th Edition), so that they are not included in the general benefit calculation.
2 Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.

In addition to vehicular traffic passing by the improvements, we also need to estimate the general benefits conferred to pedestrians that don’t reside within the District, but may walk by the improvements. For this purpose, we will consider the estimated population within one-half mile of the various masonry wall improvements who may walk past those improvements on a daily basis.

The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S.

Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, 2011) analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation (FHWA, 2011).

In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the masonry wall improvements, and would utilize walking as their mode of transportation, we applied the

11.70% of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the estimated number of persons residing within one-half mile of each Zone boundary.

In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the masonry wall improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that may walk by the various improvements, but live outside of the various Zones, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people walking along the improvements would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 14 The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of each Zone would use the sidewalks along the Zone boundary where the improvements are located:

Trip Purpose
Number of Walking
Trips (in millions)
School/Daycare/Religious 872
Shopping/Errands 5,820
Social/Recreational 2,268
Don’t know/Other 139
Total 9,099

Of the total number of walking trips reported, 9,099 (in millions), or 42.81%, are for purposes that persons outside of each Zone would utilize the sidewalks along the Zone boundary where the improvements are located. We then need to estimate the accumulated amount of time it would take for these pedestrians to traverse the various improvements walking at a conservative average speed of 2 MPH.

The following table summarizes the calculation of population-hours for pedestrians passing by the masonry wall improvements, based upon the methodology and assumptions above:

Zone
Estimated
Residential Units
Outside Zone 1
Estimated
Population
Outside Zone 2
Estimated
Number of
Pedestrians 3
Estimated
Number of Peds.

Passing 4
Length
of Imp.
(mi)
Time
Passing
Imp. (hr) 5
Population-
Hours
(General)
1 2,845 8,023 939 402 0.296 0.1480 59.47
2 1,984 5,595 655 280 0.226 0.1130 31.67
5 1,287 3,629 425 182 0.423 0.2115 38.45
6 895 2,524 295 126 0.207 0.1035 13.08
8 539 1,520 178 76 0.047 0.0235 1.79
11 720 2,030 238 102 0.028 0.0140 1.42
TOTAL POPULATION-HOURS (PEDESTRIAN) 145.88
1 Within one-half mile of Zone.
2 2.82 residents per household, per U.S. Census Bureau data. Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number. 3 An estimated 11.70% of population use walking as pr imary mode of transportation. Number shown is round ed to the nearest whole number.
4 An estimated 42.81% of pedestrians may walk by improvements for purposes described above. Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.
5 Estimated using an average walking speed of 2 MPH.

Summing the total special and general population-hours gives us a total of 36,692.65; therefore, the general benefit to vehicle occupants and pedestrians passing by the masonry wall improvements throughout the District is estimated to be 1.32% [(337.97 + 145.88) / 36,692.65].

Masonry Wall General Benefit 1.32%

5.4 Landscape Maintenance
In order to estimate the general aesthetic benefit conferred by the maintenance of the various landscaping improvements throughout the District, we will use the same methodology used to determine the general benefits conferred by the maintenance of the masonry wall improvements. The landscaping improvements for Zones 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 11 are all along the masonry walls within those Zones, so the population-hours data calculated for the masonry wall improvements will be the same for the landscape maintenance.

However, there are four additional Zones for which the landscape maintenance must be considered: Zones

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 15 13, 14, 15, and 16. The following shows the number of residential units, the estimated persons, and the total population-hours for each Zone benefitting from the landscape improvements:

Zone
Number of
Residential
Units
Estimated
Number of
Persons 1
Population-
Hours (Special) 2
1 74 209 5,008.32
2 133 375 9,001.44
5 223 629 15,092.64
6 80 226 5,414.40
8 17 48 1,151.56
11 8 23 541.44
14 17 48 1,150.56
TOTAL 552 1,558 37,360.36
1 2.82 persons per household. Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.
2 Estimated Number of Persons multiplied by 24 (hours)
There are also three non-residential Zones that benefit from the landscaping improvements and need to be considered. Due to the commercial nature of these properties, the calculation of population-hours will differ from that of the residential parcels. For these parcels, we will estimate population-hours factoring how long it takes for each vehicle trip generated by the properties within these Zones to traverse the improvements located within each Zone. The following table shows the calculation of population-hours for the non-residential Zones:

Zone Street
Speed
Limit
Length of
Imp. (mi)
Time
Passing
Imp. (hr)
Average Daily
Vehicle Trips 2
Estimated
Vehicle
Occupants 3
Population-Hours
(Special)
13 &15 1 Victor Rd. 45 MPH 0.414 0.0092 1,377 2,306 21.21 16 Kettleman Ln. 35 MPH 0.376 0.0107 559 937 10.05
L. Sac. Rd. 50 MPH 0.117 0.0023 381 638 1.50
TOTAL POPULATION-HOURS (SPECIAL) 32.76
1 The improvements for Zones 13 and 15 are exactly the same, so they were considered one entity for purposes of this calculation. 2 Estimated average daily vehicle trips, based upon data compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (7 th Edition). 3 1.674 persons per vehicle. Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.

From this, we have determined that the total population-hours relating to special benefit are 37,393.12:

Category
Population -Hours
(Special)
Residential 37,360.36
Non -Residential 32.76
TOTAL 37,393.12

We now need to estimate the population-hours generated by occupants in vehicles passing by the landscape improvements throughout the District. Any vehicle using the City’s streets that lie along the boundaries of the District that is coming or going to a parcel within the District ultimately is not part of the “general public” benefitting from the improvements and services, and will not be included in the calculation of general benefit. Just like in the previous subsection, we will use several factors for such calculation, including average daily vehicle trips for the streets passing by the improvements of each Zone, the speed limit of those streets, the length of the improvements, and the estimated number of occupants

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 16 per vehicle. The following table summarizes the calculation of population-hours for vehicle occupants passing by the landscape improvements, based upon the methodology and assumptions above:

Zone Street
Speed
Limit
Length of
Imp. (mi)
Time
Passing Imp.
(hr)
Average Daily
Vehicle Trips 3
Estimated
Vehicle
Occupants 4
Population-
Hours
(General)
1 Stockton St. 40 MPH 0.231 0.0058 10,052 16,827 97.06 Almond Dr. 30 MPH 0.065 0.0022 3,170 5,307 11.56
2 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.226 0.0050 8,439 14,128 70.87 5 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.310 0.0069 5,457 9,136 62.88 Mills Ave. 30 MPH 0.113 0.0038 2,559 4,284 16.16
6 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.081 0.0018 11,115 18,608 33.43 Cherokee Ln. 45 MPH 0.126 0.0028 3,439 5,757 16.15
8 L. Sac. Rd. 50 MPH 0.047 0.0009 14,575 24,400 22.70 11 Harney Ln. 45 MPH 0.028 0.0006 6,891 11,536 7.16 13 &15 1 Victor Rd. 45 MPH 0.414 0.0092 9,423 15,774 145.06 14 2 Westgate Dr. 25 MPH 0.157 0.0063 172 289 1.81
16 Kettleman Ln. 35 MPH 0.376 0.0107 28,291 47,361 508. 21 L. Sac. Rd. 50 MPH 0.117 0.0023 19,274 32,266 75.73
TOTAL POPULATION-HOURS (VEHICLE OCCUPANTS) 1,068.78
1 The improvements for Zones 13 and 15 are exactly t he same, so they were considered one entity for purposes of this calculation. 2 Average Daily Trips along Westgate Dr. were estima ted, using data compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (7 th Edition), since data from the City was not available.
3 Data provided by the City; adjusted to remove esti mated average daily vehicle trips generated by the parcels within each Zone, based upon data compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (7 th Edition), so that they are not included in the gen eral benefit calculation.
4 Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole numbe r.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 17 In addition to vehicular traffic passing by the improvements, we also need to estimate the general benefits conferred to pedestrians that don’t reside within the District, but may walk by the improvements. For this purpose, we will consider the estimated population within one-half mile of the various landscape improvements who may walk past those improvements on a daily basis.

Zone
Estimated
Residential Units
Outside Zone 2
Estimated
Population
Outside Zone 3
Estimated
Number of
Pedestrians 4
Estimated
Number of
Peds. Passing 5
Length
of Imp.
(mi)
Time
Passing
Imp. (hr) 6
Population
-Hours
(General)
1 2,845 8,023 939 402 0.296 0.1480 59.47
2 1,984 5,595 655 280 0.226 0.1130 31.67
5 1,287 3,629 425 182 0.423 0.2115 38.45
6 895 2,524 295 126 0.207 0.1035 13.08
8 539 1,520 178 76 0.047 0.0235 1.79
11 720 2,030 238 102 0.028 0.0140 1.42
13 & 15 1 329 928 109 46 0.414 0.2070 9.62
14 207 584 68 29 0.157 0.0785 2.30
16 2,152 6,069 710 304 0.493 0.2465 74.93
TOTAL POPULATION-HOURS (PEDESTRIAN) 232.73
1 The improvements for Zones 13 and 15 are exactly the same, so they were considered one entity for purposes of this calculation. 2 Within one-half mile of Zone.
3 2.82 residents per household, per U.S. Census Bureau data. Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number. 4 An estimated 11.70% of population use walking as pr imary mode of transportation, as noted in Section 5 .3. Number shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.
5 An estimated 42.81% of pedestrians may walk by impr ovements for purposes described in Section 5.3. Num ber shown is rounded to the nearest whole number.
6 Estimated using an average walking speed of 2 MPH.

Summing the special and general population-hours gives us a total of 38,694.63; therefore, the general benefit to vehicle occupants and pedestrians passing by the landscape improvements throughout the District is estimated to be 3.36% [(1,068.78 + 232.73) / 38,694.63].

Landscaping General Benefit 3.36%

5.5 Street Parkway Trees Maintenance
All of the street parkway tree improvements within the various Zones are along what are considered local streets, i.e. streets other than major arterial or collector streets within the City. In other words, these streets are intended to serve only the individual residential neighborhoods in which they are located, and not to be pass-through streets. In addition, according to the City’s General Plan (2010), local streets accommodate low volumes of local traffic and provide access to individual parcels. Local streets typically have two travel lanes and allow parking on both sides of the street. Through traffic is permitted on local streets, but high speeds are discouraged.

From a visual inspection of the layout of the various Zones, one must conclude that the purpose of the local streets is exclusively intended for the benefit of the parcels on such streets. There is no local street that provides a direct or efficient means of traveling from one place to another such that one could reasonably expect a driver to purposefully choose the District’s local streets as the best route for travel unless necessary because the route either began or ended with a parcel in the District. A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the “general public” for purposes of determining general benefit.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 18 However, one can imagine a minimal degree of pass-through traffic even on something such as a cul-de- sac. As expressed by the Appellate Court in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010), “... courts of this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement projects provide general benefits ." Given the location to the schools, parks, and shopping in the City, there are bound to be drivers that make use of the local streets for no other reason but to turn around or go back from where they came, especially if they are dropping their children off at one of the schools. Additionally, given the nature of the street trees, one could imagine a small degree of “residential tourism” wherein drivers are in fact simply “passing through” to enjoy the beautiful views of the homes, the natural surroundings or visiting friends. A conservative estimate of 0.50% for each scenario would result in the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetic benefits resulting from the maintenance of the street parkway trees on local streets to be 1.00% and the special benefit is estimated to be 99.00%.

Street P arkway Trees General Benefit 1.00%

5.6 Collective General Benefit
Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetic benefits resulting from a blend of improvements (masonry walls, landscaping, and street parkway trees), the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the general benefit percentages has been used to quantify the overall level of general benefit for the District. This general benefit result is provided in the table below:

Masonry Walls General Benefit 1.32%
Landscaping General Benefit 3.36%
Street Parkway Trees General Benefit 1.00%
District General Benefit 1.89%

The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total annual maintenance costs that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 1.89%. The special benefit, which is the percentage of the total annual maintenance costs that may be funded by assessments, is 98.11%.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 19

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec 22574).

The Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel:
 Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic special benefits.  Benefit Factor: Multiplier. This is the Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) value per parcel.  Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel’s benefit points multiplied by the parcel’s benefit factor. The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel.

The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the benefit units assigned to each parcel.

6.1 Benefit Points
The following table shows the Aesthetic Benefit Points to be assigned per DUE for each Zone, based upon the benefits conferred by the maintenance of various Landscape, Masonry Wall, and Street Tree improvements within the District (one point for each of the improvement types):

Landscape
Aesthetic
Benefit Points
Masonry Wall
Aesthetic
Benefit Points
Street Parkway Trees
Aesthetic
Benefit Points

Aesthetic Benefit Points per
DUE
Zone 1 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Zone 2 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Zone 3 0 + 0 + 1 = 1
Zone 4 0 + 0 + 1 = 1
Zone 5 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Zone 6 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Zone 8 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Zone 9 0 + 0 + 1 = 1
Zone 11 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Zone 13 1 + 0 + 0 = 1
Zone 14 1 + 0 + 1 = 2
Zone 15 1 + 0 + 0 = 1
Zone 16 1 + 0 + 0 = 1

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 20

6.2 Benefit Factor
The basis of determining a parcel’s benefit factor is a weighting formula commonly known as a Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE). The developed single-family residential parcel is used as the base-unit for the calculation of the benefit factor and is defined as 1.00 DUE. All other property types are assigned a DUE that reflects their proportional special benefit as compared to the single-family residential parcel.

The following table illustrates how DUEs are assigned to various types of property throughout the District:

PROPERTY TYPE BENEFIT FACTOR
Single Family Residential 1.000 per Property
Multi -Family Residential (Duplex) 2.000 per Property
Multi -Family Residential (3 or more units) 5.000 per Acre Commercial or Office
For the First 7.5 Acres 5.000 per Acre
For the Next 7.5 Acres 2.500 per Acre
For All Acreage Over 15.0 Acres 1.250 per Acre
Industrial 4.000 per Acre

6.3 Benefit Units
The following table shows the resulting total Aesthetic Benefit Units within each Zone:

Aesthetic
Benefit Points
per DUE

Benefit Factor
(DUE)
Total
Aesthetic
Benefit Units
Zone 1 3 x 74.000 = 222.000
Zone 2 3 x 133.000 = 399.000
Zone 3 1 x 39.000 = 39.000
Zone 4 1 x 34.000 = 34.000
Zone 5 3 x 223.000 = 669.000
Zone 6 3 x 80.000 = 240.000
Zone 8 3 x 17.000 = 51.000
Zone 9 1 x 11.000 = 11.000
Zone 11 3 x 8.000 = 24.000
Zone 13 1 x 93.104 = 93.104
Zone 14 2 x 16.000 = 32.000
Zone 15 1 x 36.268 = 36.268
Zone 16 1 x 8.3600 = 8.360
TOTAL DISTRICT-WIDE AESTHETIC BENEFIT UNITS 1,858.732

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 21

6.4 Assessment Rate Per Benefit Unit
The assessment rate for per Benefit Unit is then calculated as follows:

Total Assessable
Annual Costs 1 /
Total District
Wide Aesthetic
Benefit Units
=
Assessment Rate per
Aesthetic Benefit
Unit
1 Assessable Annual Costs are maintenance costs minu s the amount determined to relate to general benefit that are not assessable.

Since the assessment rate has traditionally been presented as an Assessment Rate per DUE, it is important to convert these Assessment Rates per Benefit Unit into the simpler Assessment Rate per DUE, for comparative purposes. For any parcel within the District, that calculation is as follows:

Assessment Rate per
Aesthetic Benefit
Unit
x

Benefit Points
Assigned to
Parcel
= Assessment Rate per
DUE

Assessment Rates per DUE for each Zone—based on the FY 2022/23 budget for the District—can be found in Section 7 of this report.

6.5 Adjustments to Maximum Assessments
Any new or increased assessment requires certain noticing and meeting requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218, legislative changes in the Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California defined the definition of “new or increased assessment” to exclude certain conditions. These conditions included “any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed.” This definition and conditions were later confirmed through SB919 (Proposition 218 implementing legislation).

The purpose of establishing an assessment range formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustments to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which could add to the District costs and assessments. At each Zone’s formation, balloting of property owners was required, pursuant to Proposition 218. The property owner ballots included an assessment to be approved, as well as the approval of an assessment range formula. Property owners within the District approved the proposed assessment and the assessment range formula.

The assessment range formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the maximum assessment (or adjusted maximum assessment), then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The maximum assessment is equal to the initial Assessment approved by property owners adjusted annually by the following criteria:

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 22

1. Beginning in the second fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, the maximum assessment will be recalculated annually

2. The new adjusted maximum assessment for the year represents the prior year’s maximum assessment adjusted by the greater of:
a. 5%,
b. or the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Each year the annual increase in the CPI shall be computed. For Fiscal Year 2022/23, the increase in CPI is the percentage difference between the CPI of December 2021 and the CPI for the previous December, as provided and established by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (FY 2022/23 CPI increase is 4.24%). This percentage difference shall then establish the allowed increase based on CPI. The index used shall be “All urban consumers – San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA” area. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City shall use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.

If CPI is less than 5%, then the allowable adjustment to the maximum assessment is 5%. If CPI is greater than 5%, then the allowable adjustment to the maximum assessment is based on CPI. The maximum assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment (rate per DUE) less than or equal to this maximum assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

The following table illustrates how the assessment range formula shall be applied:

Example
CPI %
Increase

5.00%
Increase
Max % Increase
Without Re-
Balloting
Prior Year
Max Rate
Per DUE
Increase Per
DUE
New Max
Rate Per
DUE
1 5.25% 5.00% 5.25% $403.00 $21.16 $424.16
2 3.44% 5.00% 5.00% $403.00 $20.15 $423.15

For example, if the percentage change in CPI is greater than 5%, as in Example 1, then the percentage adjustment to the maximum assessment will be by CPI. If the percentage change in CPI is less than 5%, as in Example 2, then the percentage adjustment to the maximum assessment will be 5%.

As previously illustrated, the maximum assessment will be recalculated and adjusted annually. However, the Council may reduce or freeze the maximum assessment at any time by amending the annual engineer’s report.

Although the maximum assessment will normally increase each year, the actual assessments may remain virtually unchanged. The maximum assessment adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The maximum assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjustment maximum amount.

If the budget and assessments for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted maximum assessment, then the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 23 If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted maximum assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment.

In order to impose an increased assessment, the Council must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 (Article XIIID Section 4c of the California Constitution). Proposition 218 requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners, through the balloting process, must approve the proposed assessment increase. If the proposed assessment is approved, then a new maximum assessment is established. If the proposed assessment is not approved, the Council may not levy an assessment greater than the adjusted maximum assessment previously established.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 24

ESTIMATE OF COSTS

7.1 Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/23
NBS has reviewed the budget and discussed with City staff the improvements and maintenance services provided by the assessment revenue. The costs for Fiscal Year 2022/23 are summarized in the following table:

Description Amount
Annual Maintenance:

1. Landscape
Maintenance $31 ,846 .32
Contingency 3, 184.63
Reserve 0.00
Total Landscape $35,030.95

2. Street Parkway Trees
Maintenance $1,000.00
Contingency 100.00
Total Street Parkway Trees $1,100.00

3. Masonry Walls
Repair/Maintenance/Graffiti Removal $1,000.00
Contingency 100.00
Total Masonry Walls $1,100.00
Total Annual Maintenance: $37,230.95

General Benefit Contribution 1: ($ 703.66 )

Total Assessable Maintenance: $36,527.29

Incidentals:

1. Consultant Fees $14,500.00

2. City Administrative Fees 1, 826.36

3. Publication 1,500.00

4. County Collection Fees 338.39
Total Incidentals: $18,164.75

Total Assessable Maintenance & Incidentals: $54,692.04

Surplus from Previous Fiscal Year: ($ 20 ,565.78 )

BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT: $34,1 26.26
1 Information about the General Benefit component ca n be located in Section 5 of this report.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 25

7.2 Assessment Rate Per DUE
Based upon the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget from the previous subsection, and the Method of Assessment for the District, the following table shows the revised Fiscal Year 2022/23 Maximum Assessment Rate per DUE for each Zone, the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Actual Assessment Rate per DUE for each Zone, the number of DUE within each Zone, and the Total Annual Assessment for each Zone:

FY 2022/23 Maximum
Assessment/DUE
FY 2022/23 Actual
Assessment Rate/DUE DUE
Total FY 2022/23
Annual Assessment
Zone 1 $703.18 $55.08 74.000 $4,075.92
Zone 2 509.09 55.08 133.000 7,325.64
Zone 3 535.25 18.36 39.000 716.04
Zone 4 610.71 18.36 34.000 624.24
Zone 5 301.04 55.08 223.000 12,282.84
Zone 6 914.51 55.08 80.000 4,406.40
Zone 8 645.63 55.08 17.000 936.36
Zone 9 168.87 18.36 11.000 201.96
Zone 11 204.37 55.08 8.000 440.64
Zone 13 181.06 18.36 93.104 1,709.34
Zone 14 402.47 36.72 16.000 587.52
Zone 15 180.78 18.36 36.268 665.8 4
Zone 16 73.77 18.36 8.360 153.48
ROUNDING ADJUSTMENT $0.04
TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT $34,126.26

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 26

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS

Assessment Diagrams have been submitted to the City Clerk in the format required under the provisions of the Act and are made part of this report.

POR. ALMONDWOOD ESIAIES THIS MAP
,4SSESSMENT
/S FOR
USE ONLY 062-61
Z"Js I
d/
rì\
I4J
H(r)
50'
\s=I
ñ
Ë
.\'S
v,
Ë
ñ
50'
rìSV,
87'
aet
S
Ë
HIGHEST A.P,N, USÉD
YEAR 'AR, # P^R # PAR.
04-05 10

CIW OF LODI
Assessor's Map 8k.062 Pg.61
County of Son Jooquín, Colíf.

Assessor's Porcel ^lumbers Shown in Circles.

Assessor's Slock Numbers Shown in E//þses.
/ci 4á.61'
-@i
*71 ¿

55.4/
nl
3 (J9)"Fsv-ls
734

55.00'

57.0/
\ (J8) EN \_-/ ,
72è
N. 89' 2J'E
tS ln'

50.05'tr \- 'f9
e (JZ r^
SV¡
7t
' \ 90.00
\- os ì-@\9"Ë
tu'T
ffi
5b4
b -- rã lf* BEECH
$ 0/ Yj/ I\e C1Ul
'6 66
t
Rn 77'
-\¡s'r'
s (Jo)
.iv
64 60.00'

60.40'
70 Ë_\* 80*
L=0.99'14.t4
(¿li\
à
N. 89',?J'8.
(Ð
AVENUE
T so.6t' s
$@,t$ , oo' ,r't t
- 90-62'
zz 122)
N- 69', 2t'E
't\
\
t00.00
i@ ?4;
N. 89' 2.t' E.
â t,@
3@ r,E
N. 89'23'E
t0r.00'
ez-\ì
12oe9 t
N 89',
'.1'
f
È@ru;
N. 89' 23' E.
t0t.00'
!tee9 [
N. 89' 2J' E.
i@z7S
N. 89', 2J' E.
: '"å. r
. tsQï;
\t 94.t6'IUU.W I
Sf2ã 2a xq \_/
N ß9' 23' E. i
@
'a
29:ù
t06.96-
ì€9
tû6,97'
@
ffi*'.r\ q
\lq
î (9 /rñ
õ
N. 89'23' E.
x
q
- (40)
\_-,i
@
t0t.JJ'
i 6à t4 ¡rt \_-/ k
N. 89 2J' Ë.
l0LJt
ìúàtsF.l \-./ hi
N 89' 2.t' F.
;@'u$
Al ß9' x' r
* @ tz f
t\t J?'
-
N.
@
R. M. Bk. 38 Pg. NOIf
City of Lodl, Community Development Department Received 08J3012@4 OIYNERIE STA=IEITET{Í:
!^E ÎJq uNDERsroNEb. HERIBY sTÁtÊ tt{AT uE rRE Art rHE pARlrEs r¿avmc REcoRI} Inu tNrER€sl ri¡ tHË ljliluÐryD¡û Ât{r s,{owl o¡l t}ls Ílr,l¡L Htp o¡ .rnicr Ho. szz¡ suælræ¡o¡s oF sit¡t JoÀourucouNTy. Ær¡oNDr¡¿o0ü EsrArEs" cfiy oF LoDr, cAlJFoRÑr4 ¡¡¡O m ¡¡niBr, ó¡¡idä-ro nr¡ iiääiou r¡romrNc 0F lrrrs Rr.rÁL Mp rN rHE omcE o¡'nr¡ coiiliri iùioäöiä or-si-iiñoriJ-cdü'il,j'äfiËìiïiü"*- !.8.4¡O_ -oFrE FoR DEDF4ÌION rc Èq-ryplq Fo_R .R:F!o usE Alr pu8uc rrltr.tly €AsÃtEr.fls, Àtt cf8Err!Lq[s:oF,.\rÁf fiq vAEHðtt-lyrDTH rflo-s,{ilrcs oF njefÈôr-w7ú rr.ono-s¡dno¡r srnr¿t ND ñrdi¡ii-'q_EF 4N0 8+litnu$t Tci aÉ cny or e.ol nr. ræ.6È nr-o.+È o¡'lirli ið'nm¡ 4?, s2.rHRu si; 5e lïg ql' c6 rïßq ð¿ ¡xo 7+ ro AND ribM srockiblv srfriEi Àro-LoÉ'bïiti -+s
ib e¡ü'Èifuv ii¡ii¡¡¡oDRir/E ÀIr AS SHoff{ oli fflts FtMt M¡F. -. --- -'- - ' TRACT N'O.. 32*73

SU,BDIVISIONS OF SAN JCIAQUIN COUNTY
ALMONDTTICI.O..Ð ESTATES
BETNG LOT f5 AND A PORTIOñ OF LOT 14 AS SHOWN 0N
MAP OF A.J. LARSoN'S,StlBDtVlSlON OF lllE NORTHEAST
SUARTER OF SECTON 13 tN rO\¡iÑ,$HrP 3 NoRTH, RANGE 6
EASî, M.D.g. & M.. FJLED F,OR RFCORD NOVEMBER 7, 1890
IN BOOK 2 OF M.APS AND ÈLATS, PAGE 4,

CITY OF LODI, SAN JOAQUIN COUN'TY, CALIFORNIA
DAVID EVANS A.ND ASSOEIATES, INC.

SALIDA, EAUFORNI.A
DECEMBER, 2OO2 SFJEET 1 OF 4
VNIN|I.I MAP
N0 scÂt_E
MY C0MMISSIQN Ð(PIRES. ,>->?-oG;
C¡**-+t ,ã' 6s?å
oo'u,,l,"RQ?ã13''1å===
Fâêó.d.d lñ olf¡€l¡l Ræords
rurlrlmrllnmniiffiffilffinn
RËöORöËhIs, STATEIIENÌ¡
iìË'äåÏ'ÌiüÏ-'- *' * 9eÉ¿r'J4i+ , 2¡e!¡, â¡4Ír ç u, rr
tos* g$* 0F M¡ps onD r*o, o, J*. ñ* AT'HE REouEsT oF DAI¿D Ev¡Nì A¡\tt AssoalÂtEgr¡lo.
*, ¡ litþ#-
&qY. tNc., A qAUFORN|À CoRpoRÀlloil
GOUNTY, CâIIFORI{IA
OE
o¡n¡ nrs t? olv or S¿.ek¿-x\*.r¡ , zæå
puBue uiÐRKs DREeio.R-Ë sfaÌÊÍÊôIf.:
r. RICHARû C, ptm¿ ¡n, rË.ÉÈt sl'ÁlË ThAl I All THE pusuç n/oRt(S cAllFoRNA ÀND rH l I nÀ.!E E{,q¡4ttEû'Íìt3 nñðL M¡p of 'fiÊ¡ci No. cou.¡{r, ÂtM0Nüil000 sÎÀË. cdù 0F lorjÀ cáuFoRNA ÀN0 Íhr ilsu$f.ArfiÆry ÌHË wË. As,Íl 'ip-p¡âkÐ.l)l¡
THE .rBÍAtpË raaÉ: Áñ-0'
FUBFER sTAlE rMT tHß h.¡llr tt{ÀF eÕr¡ÞrtÈS. ilÍH ¡r n¡ p¡iôiíis'Oi coDE ÁNû Ar.ff ¡ils¡D¡ùEi{',fs'niËRÈiö, þpuù¡u Ar tHE tifË atË ){Þ¡ ,,.ÀDÂtË .¡1s /b-. olv or Sep.rErrorR , eo&,l-
COUMfY SUh1/EYOBiS SÌATEME{Í:

I, IHO}¡;{S R. FUNII, EÊREÉY SIÀÌE fiÂT I HAVE ÐG}'INEI' Ï]ls RMT MP Of 'IMEf NO. 3273, SUBÚMSIONS oF sAtl ,,o¡dulN côij!,¡rr. ArxoilDnooD €sIAlEs', oTy 0F LoDt, c¡LrFoRNrA A¡{0 IHÁr IHE suBDMsoN sHolfll HÊREo..Nco{rutf {ú1þiÈË eawsrors o¡ c¡un¡n z oine c¡¡ronNlÁ sulEorusb¡¡ MÄp AcT, As Är¡Ð¡0Err.
^ND
rllAf Tl{s RMt l¡ÁP rs IEcHNtcAtIY coRREcf.
âß.69
4g- qç, oo2soo r-r
BASIS. OF B=EiARINGS: REEERENGÉS:
(R1) M.¿¿P. 2-4
(R2) R.s. 7-65
(fi3) M.&P. 27-9
(R4) R.S. 27-80
(Rû) M,&P. 2e-37
(R6) M.&P. 34-57
IEGENù
---@-
--€-
---€--
(M)
M.0.8:&M.
(M-M)
M.&P.

P.M.

R.S.
.s.J.c.R.
s.N.F.
(r)
()
o.R.
(c)
(R7) R.S. 21-33
(R8) M.&P. 27-40
(R9) P.M. 6-133
(RlO) P.[r- 2-174
(R11) P.M. 7-177

MONUMENT
s.N-F.
(NO'41'301rrXR6XR6)
I
=)
cotEElnY
wAv
TRACT NCI. 3Z?3
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQI.}IN COUI\ITY
ATMOND.TOOD ESTATES
BEING LOT 15 AND A PORTION OF LOT 14, AS SHOW{ ON
MAP OF A.J. LARSON'S SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTI{EAST
QUARTER OF SECÍION 13 IN TOVì/}¡SHIF 3 NORÏ'I.I, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.B. & M,, FILED FOR RECORD NOVEMBER 7, 1890
IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4,

CITY OF LODI, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

SALIDA, CALIFORNIA
DECEMtsER, 2002 SCA!-E 1'=100'
SHEET 2 OF 4
FOUND 7r" IRON ROD,
IAGGEÐ R.C.E. 19638
IN MONUMEÎtJT WELL
PER (R8}
sÊl 2 1/2" BRÂSS D|SK, STATTPED
L.S. ô008, IN MONUMENT WEU
FOUND MONUMENÍ IN MONUMENT WELL
AS NOÍEO
sFr 3/4' x 24" LONB tRoN P|PE,
TACGEÞ L.S. 6008
MFÅSLIRED
MOUNÍ DIABLO BASE ANE MERIDIAN
MONUüENT IO MONUMENT MEASUREMSI.¡T
M¡PS ¡¡IO PL¡'IS

PAREEL MAP

RECORD OF SURVEY
SAN JOÄQUIN COUNÛ RECORDS
SEARCHEÞ FOR, NOT FOUNO
TOI.AL
RECORD DATA (SE€ REFERENCES)
oFFrClAt- RECORDS ?"CALCULATED ¡C.E
FOUND 3/4" |RON
ROD & CAP, R.C.E,
19636 rN
MONUMENÎ WEI.¡.

PER (R3)
I
=rit
¿l
n,
"I
I
¡!laol
*l6lzl
oElÁrl :É'
NO SC-'qEE
(NO RECORD)
ÕEfAlL_ 18'
m-smiE-
F^W¡14.8il
WA.Y
FOUND CHTSEIEO'+' 4.67'
NOÎ*ÌH OF Èiö.W- O¡¡ l-l¡¡e
NoRTr+ ANÐ Soul.¡r (Â4)
Ê,olilND 3/4' |RON
RO.D & GAP, R6.E.
19ô34 rN \
MòNIJI|IEM WELL FOUND 3/4" |RON
ROE & CAP, R.C.E.

IN
MONUMENT WELI.

PER (R3)
PËR (R6)
SEE
DÉÍAL "B'
FoUND 3/4'rRoN
R0Ð & cAP, R.C.E.
19838 tN
MONUMEI{tr WEII-
PER (R3)
FOTJND 3/4" rRoN
ROD & CÀP, R.C.E
19659 rN
MONUMÉÍ{T WEIÀ
PER (É3)
i i NoMA RANCH
i TRACT 187,6 (M.eP. 27-s\
_ _78L70,--'-r,¿+ s6crro¡l l-6e STÖ:Ci(f'ôil SÌnÈÈT
ñoR-lH
SONGBIRDPLACE L f=loo,
THIS SUBDIVISION CONSISTS OF 74 LOTS CONTAINING 14.57
AChEs GROSè.

I,HIS SITE IS NOT SUBIE€T TO A IOO-YEAR FLOOD.

ALL REFSÊENCES ARE TO SAN JOAOUIN COUNTY RECOROS
ANT BOOK OR VOLUilE PRËCEOES P;AGE.

ALL DISTÄNCES ARE MEASLJRED UNI.ESS OÍIIERWSE NOIED.

FOUND y{' rRoN R0Þ, fAcG,ED
R,C.E. 19638 IN MONUMENI
wÊl¡L PËR (R6)
FoUND 3/4" ÌRON ROD,/ (
TAGCEU R.C.E. 1963A tN I
MONUMENI wEtL PER (R6) SE"TER
0F
SEE
DETAiL
BOCK "A" OF DEEDS
v. ?39 @ p. 253

3. +,

5. IRON
(R2) - + \.

D1"
PER
$E
Tø
DEÍAIL'F'
FOUND P.K, NAIL
LOT 1
(R5)
i .4â-E A!
I ilililllllillllllllllllillllillllllllillllllllllllll ffi;l:!ri*.' 3¡8,-6frf¡soor_ri
F-OU.Ài-D. 3/1" tRiiN, RoD.
srÆr4PEó RdE 1Sô38 tN
PËR M.*F. zô*r7. sEÈ
SHEET 2
qÁPlto 4!DA lrçM. BpxDEÍÀL "B'-
5 I FAWNHAVEN
l(iv.&P. 2B-
i
7-7 )
1 å3ts"3,i"r1i#rìovannrube ( M. &pILt* , 58i s7 I so
27-e)
t' .5d
TRACT NO. 3273
SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUII\I COUI{TY
ALMOND}TOOD ESTATES
BEING LOT 15 AND A PORTON OF LOT 14, AS SHOWN ON
MAP OF A,J. LARSON,S SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARÏER OF SECTION 13 IN TOV¡{SI.{IP 3 NOR'IH, RANGE
6 EAST. M.D.B. & M., FILED FOR RECORD NO\€MBER 7,
1890 IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 4,
CI.TY OF LODI, SAN JOAQUIN COUNfi, CALIFORNIA
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

SALIDA, CALIFORNIA
4 I J +s+.aa'ç¡2
NOT 1. 'fHE P,U.E, DEDICATION GÍVES THE CITY, OWNERS OF PUBLIC I,ÌILMES AND ACCEPTEÐ, OWNERS OF CABLE T.V. FRA¡¡CHISES THE RI6HT TO ACCESS. CONSTRUCT, POSffION MAII{TAIN, INSPECT, REPAIR, REPLAOE, REMOVE ¡ú{D OFERATE THEIR FACILI'TIES IN THE DIFIERE¡J¡ P.U.E,'S. NO BUILDINGS OR SIRUCIURES SHATI BE CONSIRUCIEO I.¡OR S¡I¡I.I. i FRoM Ar.ryrHrNc BE pLANTEÐ HIHTN THE EÂsEMEtÍ wHtcH woulD TNTERFERE wnx rHe usE RECORD OR OPER.AIION OF PUBLIC UNLÍÍIES IN'fHE EASEMENT, N O.24'
E 0,09' 2. REQUIREIUE¡f'S 0F THE LODI MUNICIPAL COoE FOR THE DEDTCATTON 0F i SEE bTNI- RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEI,IENÍS, AEANÐONMENT OF UNDERGROUND TANKS AND WELLS, oÂ" qHFr r PAYMENT OF ÊEES ANE INSIALIA'noN 0F oFF-SiTE SIRÊEf |MPROVEMEÍ\fTS AND UïLTIES HA\G NOT BEEN MET AT ÍHIS TIME AND MUST BE MET PRIOR TO ¡ DEvELopMENT 0R tssuANcE oF A ËutLDtNo pERMll wlEN REQUESTED gy rxE émy.

N0û36'29'!v SEE SHEET 2 FOR Æ)DTÍIONAL NOTES.

BASIS OF BEARINCS:

THE MONUMENIEO CEòÍTERLINE OF ALMOND DRIVE ÎAKEN AS NORTI.I WAY DECEMBER, 2002 SCALE l'=50'
SHEET 3 OF 4
O
cO
I
l--
(\
8É44'OOI EASiT PER "COI.VIN RANOH' SUBÐMSION FILEO FOR RECORD ! JUNE T6, 1999 IN BOOK 34 OF MAPS AND PI.AT.S AT PAGE 37, SAN i JOAOU¡N COUNIY RECORDS, LÊOFNDJ
MONUMENÎS SEl: I
sEt 2 1/2'BRASS 0ßK, STAMPED
L.S.6OO8, IN STANDARÐ MONUMENT WELL

FOUND MONUMENT IN MONUMENT WELL

AS NOTED
l¡r x 24' IRON RODS CAPP€D & STAilPEE 'LS 6008' wLL SE SET ¡r -@-]ALL REAR LOl CORNEñS, CHISELED CROSSES "+" wlLL BE SET IN i eoNçRErE stDErvALK AT s-Foor offsEr ro FRoNT Lor coRNERs oru --fr

EXTENSION OF LOT LINE,
Ø
585.75'
-
stf 3/4" x 30" LoNc tRoN P|PE,--"-- t¡cc¡'o l-s. eooe
:.:\}:.\ RESTR¡C1ED PUBLIC ÄCCESS
(M-M), MoNUMENT To MoNUMÊNT
(M-FL) MONUMENT TO PROPERIY LINE
u.ap. I MAPs AND FLAIS
M.E;Ê.&ìl. MOt NI DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN
o,n. i oFFrcrÂL RÊooRDs
PRe POINT OF RETVERSE Cti¡RVE
P.I.J.E. PUBLIC IJTILÍIY EASEMENT
(R} RADIAL
R,g, RËCORD OF SURVEY
rl
_olÉl
'ól
zl
N00 ìô
- I!gæ'L N 2j6.?11!:!} -: N9q¡6'2s"'/ll _z!s.Iglß{:-v)
óN 6N SAN JOAOUIN COUNÎY RECORDS
TOIAL
W¡TNSSS CORNERI
I
I
t
al'$
ils
(-
\ 57 t--
Ld
Llj
I
U)
ti
so,() lu'
13'BUILDING
sËÌi¡Àêk rtr.¡f:

PËR (317ó
uìta
blåoz
L¡l
LJ
(n
O:R. 179)
L V¿RIAË'IË-WDIH STREET
ñ Rtclif -ciÊ-wAY DEbtÒÀT6N
bN
ty'4
Nelo.¿T'Tä1i lresrr'
sroeKÃÛn grHÉÊr
*gSo¡û:Ð, Sl¡lEËT Nó. 15 REF.{R TO TEMATNE MAP RËSOIUT|ON #FC OZ-'IO 23 i s,zo¡
i sa.Ff.

L-10'i P.u.F.

L___
7 5.153 Sq;Ff.
4 5,147 SQ.FÏ.
a,¿ri so.rr.'È
I I llffi illl lllllllilll lll1ill lillll illltll lilllll Y¡{i:s* * F-Noo'36'so"yv
1 1 93.1 1'
FOUNÐ 3/4'|RON
ROD R_C^f- 1S638

MONUMENT IT'ELL
(R3)
34'{6'v{
25,03'
ALA.OKBIRD
PLACE
_ N00',11
686.501(R6)
i 2. REQT,IIRÊMSNIS OF THE LOEI iIUNICIPAL çQDE F-Oß TJ,TE -qTDI9AIION OF ñiOrrS:oÈ-wÃy, EeSEuEuS, ABANoONMENT 0F UNÞËRGROI,I:ID TÀNl(ç ÁN.D ' WELLS. pAyilËr.fi oF FEES AND tNsrALLATtoN gF oFF-silE STREEI llilFRotEMENrs l¡ro titunrEs HA\íE NoT BEËN r',rEf Al lHts ÏME AND MUsr BE MEI FRÍoR To i ôlraioÞtiË¡g ôä isóû¡¡rðeõr ¡ euir-orño pÈnun ún¿ñ neoueSreo Év tnr I crrY-
. SEE SHEET 2 FOR ADDITIONAL NO'IES.

I gns,s o, euR,*..'
I r¡¡ uotuuEgrgD cENfERLtNE oF ALMoND DRtvÊ TAI<EN As tloRTH , E6:44IOOú EAST pER "COLVIN RANCH" SUBDMS|oN RtfD FOR REQORD .,uN.E 16, r9à9 rN LOOK 34 OF {t¡FS Al,¡D PLÁfS AT PAÒÈ 37, SAl.l JOAOUIN COIJI{TY REEORDS.

MONIJMENTS SEt:
lt" x 2+' |RON RODS CAPPED & STAiJPED "16 Ç008' WLL 8E SEr AT ALL REAR LOT CORNERS. CHISELED CROSSES "+" $I.L BE SEf IN CONORETE SIDEIVALK AT 3-fOOT OFFSEJ 'O FROTÍI LOT GORNERS ON EXÍENSION OF IOl LINE.

TRACT NO. åiå?3
SUBDIVISIOI.{S OF SAN JOAQUIN CO'UNTY
ALMONDTYO.OD E.STATES
BEING LOT 15 AND A PORTION OF LOT 14, AS SIIOW{ ON
'MAP -OF A.J. LARSON,S SUBDI'VISION OF TI-TE NORTI'IEAST SUARTER OF SECTION 13 IN TTì/NSHIP 3 îIÓRTI'I, R'ANGE 6 EAST, M.D,B. & M., F'ILED FOR REC0RD NOVEI'4BER 7' 1690' IN BOÒK 2 OF MEPS AND ÞLATS, PAÓE 4, CITY OF LOEI, AAN JOAQUIN COTJNIY, CALIFORNIÁ
ÐAVID EVANS ANÐ ASSOCIATES, INC.

SALIDA, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER, 2OO2 SC¡lrtE 1'=5O'
LÊ6END:

SÉI 2 1,12" BBASS DISK, ST'AIIPEÞ
--_@_ LS. 600.8. IN STÀNDARD MONÜi,IENT
$/ELL
^ FOUND UONUMENT IN MONUMÊNT

V U'ELL AS NOTED
^ SET 3/4. X 3,O. LONG IRON PIPE,
- TAGGED L.S. 6OOE
\5}\À\ RESTRIC'TED'PUBL{CAEGESS
(M-M) TJONUMET{Î TO MoNUMEi{Í
(M-PL) MONIJMENT TO PROPERTT LINE
u,DrA¡&M. MOUNT DI;ABI'O BÁSE AND MER¡DI¡N
ù1,&F. li¡AFS Al'lD PLATS
O.R. OFFIGIAL RECORDS

PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE
P.U.E. PUBLIC UIILIÎY ËÀSE¡'E}ÍI
(R) RADIAL
s.J.c.R. sAN JOAOUN COUñÎ1 RECORDS
(T) rorAl
w.c. wftNEss coRNER
FOUI{D 3/4" rRoN ROD,
IAGGED R.C.E. 19ô38 IN
MONUMEM WELI PER (R6)
I
sÕoso(t
_ z-1g4*{!v-Ð
STOCKTON STßEEî
pFFfR fô rf'¡f1a?r\,/Ë |l¡p REsoLtrnóN {Þ.c o2-tf)
'9glÞÈ
EÊ
ìe3
lp{
Fo
l9 57'
t$
@
r9
=I
o
I
E(22
üo
LE'ä
It4ô
tJ
I es'
w.c,. -
sr9'55' 16"w

5.44'-W 'ô
N
'16"WNOO',1'l
snxÈ
\sã
FOUND
3/4" |RON ROD,
TAGGEO R,C.E. 19638
IN MONUMENI WÊLL
PER (R6)
lilltilililllililillllflülliltlilillilllll[ilIil] åe,*"::i#*,* W*g &oesoor+

INTERLAKE SQUARI
@
N,87 J'' 8.
/e":e J

SIERM VISTA PUCE
l--
kH
à
N.87 55'E
b
@
STREET
NOIE: Assessor's Porcel Numbers
Assessor's' Block Numbers
Shown ìn Circles.

Shown ín Ellþses.
ì\6
ñ
r.j
=l
.s
.È
\.
.ë
ð
R. M. Bk. 40 P9. 089
PARK
City ot Lodi Communlty Dewloment Departrent RæÌwd: 10103/06

THIS MAP /S FOR
/ISSESSMENT USE' ONLY 045-34
$
HIGHEST A.P.N. USED
YEAR 'AR. # PAR. PAR. #
07-08 t2

CITY OF LODI
Assessor's Mop 8k.045
County of Son Jooquín,
Ps.34
Colíf .

OWI{ERS. SIAIEIIEM:

WE, THE UNOERSIGNEO, HEREFí STATE fiAT WE ¡88 ÁTL IHE PAñNES HAVINô RECORD llftE INTERESÍ IN IHE TANOS SUEDMOED AND SHOWN ON THIS FINAL MAF OF'TRACÍ NO. 3532, SUEDMSIoNS 0F SAr{ ,rO QUIN CoUNTY. |NIERT¡IG SOUARE, CtTy OF toDt, CÂUFORNIA Al'¡D l¡lg HEREFT CONSENT TO THE PREPARAÍION AND RUNG 0F IHIS FlML II¡AP IN THE OFFNE OF fHE COUI{ï RECORDER OF SAII JO¡OUIN COUNIY, CÁTJFORNIÀ WE AI-SO OFFER FOR DEOICAIION TO THE PUBUC FON PUBLIC USE A¡]. PUBUC UNIÍ¡T EASEMETÍIS AND rHE 12.20' x 12.20' CORNER CUTOFF ALOilO SCHOOL ANO PARK STF€ETS Ar¡- AS SHoWN ON IIiIS flML r,tAP.

BEING A PORÍION OF LOT 1 OF A..'. I.ARSON'S SUEDIVISION IN IHE soufHwEsÌ t/l oF sEctroN t2, r 3N., R. 6 8., M.o.S. & M., CITY OF LODI, SAN .JOAQUIN COUNTY, STA]E OF CALIFORNIA
PREPARED B/:
coNTt & ASSoC|ATES, tNC.

CIVIL CONSULTING ENGINEER
s[ocKfoil, C,AUFoRNn MAI 2005
iôçKNOwLEDG|¡[}lT
SÍAIE OF. C¡UFORNIA ,
öüñïi 'or-äüiË,ä¡n¡ Conlva Cosl'¿,.

PUEI,JC WORXS DIRECTORS SÍATtr'ENT:
l, RlCtlAR0 C. PRII¡A {,R.; HEREET SÍAIEÌHAT I At rHE PUBUC WoRKS O|RECÍOR OF lHE CI¡Y OF LODI, CAUFORNIÄ ÁND THAÎ I HAVE ðûMINEO IHIS FIt'l¡lL MAP OF TRÁCT ryoj._3-5_3?Ì SuqDrytstgrls oF sA¡{ JoAQU|N CoUNry, tNrEf,uKE SQUARE", C¡W OF 100r, CåLIFOf,NIA AI{D IHAT T}IE SUEDMSIOI{ SHOWN HEhEON IS SUBÌÁ¡¡TIA¡.LY THË SAME ÄS II ÄPPEAREO ON lHE IENTAITVË MAP, AND ANY APPRO1ÆO ALTERANONS THÊREOF. I FURII{ER STATE THAT IHIS FIML I'ÄP COMPLIES WIITI ATI THE PROVS¡ONS OF ITTLE 16 OF THE LODI MUNICIPAL CODE AND AT{Y AMT¡IOMENIS THEREÍO. APPUCÂBLE AT ïrEIIME OF APPROVAL OF T}IE TEI¡ÍATVE MAP. ?4. 94y 66 At'eosr __, 2od¡.

RrcllARO C. PRnrÀ JR., R.C.e 2ôt6t

PUEUC WORXS DIRECTOR
REGISTRANON E(PIRAÎON DAIE: -3.:3l:¿!.-
CÍTY CTERK'S STATEME}ÍÍ:
sfocKfoN. Auxil.¡AFf coßpoRATloN, tRustEE
DA1EO lHA
WAYENETOAP¡AL
' ^r¿D!!S rS Ìp Sf tE rïA1 AT m REcUr¡RLy HEU¡ MEEnNG ON IHE _å:_ 0 y OF -O¡¡gtEÈ--, zoqtP'tHE cfly couNctL oF n{E cfÍy 0F LoDt. câuFoRñA AFPRoTED.IHIS TINAL MAP OF TRACI NO. 5532, SUBDMSIONS OF SAr¡ JOAOUIN COUNÍY, II{f!R!q!E SAUARÊ., CJ'Y OF LODI, C,AUFORNIÀ A}'¡O ACCEPI€O ON BEI{ALF OF THE PUBLIC FOR PUBUC USE lHE OFFER OF DEOrcANOI OF AII PUBUC I,!IL¡'Y EASEMEI¡TS AIT. AS SHOIYII ON IHIS FIML MAP ANO ACCEPIED IHE OFFER OF DTDICATON OF IHE

12.2A X i.2.2T CORNER CUÎOFF ALONG SCHOOL AND PARK SÍREETS SUBI|ECI TO SATISFACTORY COMPLENON OF IMPNOì/ÊMEi¡IS I}IEREON OF SAIO GORNER CUTOFF IN ACCOROA¡ICE ilITI ITII.E.lô OF ]HE LODI MUNICIPAL CODE. AND A¡.fI AUENDMENTS IHERETþ, 4IFPUC,AS|E A1 rlrE I|ME OF AppRoV L OF THE iE{I ûr/E MAp.

I
o rEo turs
-ÍL-
ott or ,âuøus4 .2ss¡
oATm rxts ll'lt -- DAy oF ¡Io.-^ß¡.¡\bql , 2005.
ffi)¿./As-*-
.SfEVB,l L RUEGG - PRESIDû'¡Î
ACKNOTVITDGI¡BIT
STAIE OF CÂL¡FORNIA
COUNW OF S/qN JOAOUIN
gN il-ll'eS -, BEFoRE )tt¿ /4N ,:5.tét7 NotAff puguc. pERsot¡¡t.ty AppEARED RICHARD HÆ'¡SON, PROVED TO ME ON IHE 8ÅSIS OF SATSFAõÍORY EVIDS.ICE TO BE lHE PERSON WHOSE NâME IS SUSSCRIBEO TO THE WfI}IIN INSTRUME},T, AND ACXNOWTEDCæ TO ME IIIAT I.IE O(ECUIEO II.IE SAIIE IN HIS AI'T}IORIZEO CAPACÍTY, ANO THAT Ef HIS SIGNATURE ON THE INS'ÍRUMENT THE PERSON, OR THE ENnrY UPOI' EEllAtF OF WHTCH IHE PERSON ACïEo, E(ECUIEO IHE TNSTRUMENÍ. '¡VÍNESS MY HAN&
L,lr.r-/ A-*ñ'r7ffiffifñ-m¡mn-¡-
ABd\Æ-ME\MONED STATE AND COUNÍY
W{INESS-IÍY llAûl&r .
( 4F,'.1^ ,' ,tîl
.

NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR ll{E
A8o!E-MENnoNE0 SfÀ1E AtlD CoUNTY
trrY coMMrssroN aaazs, v¿Üâarfub
SURI/EYOR'S SÍATEMET{Í:

DArEo r¡ts 11 fq e¡y 6¡ ry'ouer¡b¿ Q . 2s06.

C.z¡-- (=ëJo"^.
ffi
UCENSS Ð(PIRAIION DAÏE: 05/3l,/06
Msu$lN ,J. Bü\CKSÍON, CfTY Ct¡R(
ANT CLERK OF lHE CITY COUNCIL
!
I
i
)
COUNÍY SUM/EIOR,S SrAIEIIIENÍ:
ryo, J9J2, SUBDMSToNS OF SAt{JoAoutN couNÏy, tNtERl¡KE SQUARE., Cry OF 100t.

CáLIFORNIA Æ'ID I}IAÍ ÌI.IE SU9DMSÍON SI{OWN HEREON COMPUES WÍT}I'ÁLL lHE PROVISIONS OF C}IAPTER 2 QF IIIE CALIFORNIA SUBDMSION MAP ACT, AÊ Â!¡ENOEO, AND IHAT THIS FINAL MAP IS IECI{N¡CåIIY CORRECÍ.
t¿0
ow O¡ tUêU€t¿l8anl , Zoog.

I. THOMAS ,R. ruNN. I{ERESY SIAIE IHAT I TIAVE ÐOrüINf,O I}IIS FINAL ¡'AP OT 'TRACT DAIED 1}IIS
RFCORDER'S STAIEITEITÍ:
-,
2006, AT
OF T,IAPS AND PWS, A1
-, Àr rxã ñÈoîEE7õFfü¡{ARtHAlooN.
rEE r-¿3Ê.--
GAFI W.-FREEMAN Fâfi'ñ'E/OEPUIY RECOROER
ASSESSOR-RECOROER-COUN¡Y CTERI(
.li;r
oN NÂ{tehrrlL¡¡¡s1'uerodi iirjit";. il"',, l. ?.i.. . ¡er ., PU8UC. ÞERSOM|IY APPÊÀñED.5ÍE.ÉTT L IfrUECG. PROT€o TO ME ON .rHE EASIS OF 9qïSF.åCrodt' EvtoErk"fö BE D{E PERSON WHOSE ' ilArlE ls suBstRt8Eo foTHEtwIliìffIñrRUr¡Er¡T, AND AcKNowrEoGEo TO ME ITÙAT HE Ð{ECUTED I}IE SAI¡E'IN HI¡¡ AU'I}IORIZEO CâPACITY,.."AND IHAT BI HIS SIGNAIURE ON lHE INSÍRUMEì¡T lHE PERSON, OR 'THE ENTIW UPON BETIAIf OF W}IICH IHE PERSON ACTEO, SGCUIEO.IHE INSIRUMENT.

MY COI4MISSþN Ð(PIREi:

REFER TO IENIÆT!'E SUEOMSION I',IP ÂPPUCAÎION O5-S-OO¡
D.D. SHEEÍ: l5B
Elctc æ 2øøe-t42736gcllllztoE 0?¡47P FÉ113.e0
På9. I ol 3
R.co¡&d ¡n offlê¡¡l R.cord.

Cohty of Sü Jorrylñ
OâRY T. ftEM4...ß.ô¡-nê.6.d..4o61v Cl.rt
På¡d bv Son d æCUñEl¡f
llllilllllllillillililfllllflillillillilllilllil sHEEf
'
oF 3
/l/¿onÁ<-, r*,
<gn"e--'
llANSOtl.;+ ITA!.IAGINC PARINER
iá*k"r.rNc.. nusrEE
r¡Y couMlssl0N E(FIRES: É4fC3:!---
ACKNOWI,EDCI¡E.If
SÍATÊ.OF C"A¡JFORNIA
::äåäüi: æ¡oae w(ìItÌÌat&NoTA* puB'c, pERSoM*y
^ppEÂRE'
HENR'
CI¡USSEN, PROVED TO ME ON THE EASIS OF SÀTSFACfORí E\'IDEI,¡CE TO BE IHE PERSON ìIHOSE NAUE IS SUBSCRIBED TO IïE lrTfilrl lNSTRUMEl,fr, Ar,lE ACKt¡OtltEOCÐ TO ME ITJAT HE EXECUIEO IllE SAI¡E lN HIS AUIHORIZEO C¡PACÍÍY, AI'ID IHAT gI HIS SIG|ì|ATURE ON I}IE INSÍRUMENT THE PERSON, OR lHE ÉI{IIfY UPON BETIAT' OF WHICH 1TIE PEFSON ACTEO, Ð(ECI'ITED'I}IE INSIRUMENI.

TRACT NO.

SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN

INTERLAKE
3532

JOAQUIN COUNTY
SQUARE

VICINITY MAP
L-J L-J l-l I I
IHIS MAP WAS PREPANEO Bf ME OR Ui¡OER MY DIRESÍION A}'ID IS SASEO UPON A RET.O SURI/EI IN CONFORITANCE Yilß Tl{E REQUIRS¡EiIIS OF Ì}IE SUBOMSION IIAÞ ACT AND LOC,AL ORDII\IANCE AT THE REQUESÍ OF CLUFF, LLC 0N DECEIIEER 15, 200,L 1 HERESI SÍAIE lHAl IHIS FlMt MAF SUSfá¡¡nALLy CONFORMS TO IHE CONDMOI\¿AIIY ÁPPROVEO ÍENTATTVE MÂP. I FUFII}IER STAIE l}IAf AIT ilE MONUMEI{ÍS SHOWN.HNEON WII BE OF 'IIIE CHARACÍER AI.¡D OúIUFI THE POSINONS INDICATED BEFORE SAID SUBOIVISION IMPROVEMEIÍIS ARË ACCEPÍEO BY THE C¡TY OF I¡DI, ANO 1}IA¡. SAIO MONUMENTS Wtr BE SUFFICIEilr T0 ENABIE'¡HIS SURVEf TO 8E RE1RAÛEo. ,--Æ\ 40 -8?, oossoos-l
C)i
m. s¿l¡t' lRoN ROD (AXC)
NO TÁG VISIBI¡

AT SURFACE
FD.5,/f |RON RoD (C)
N0 TA0 V¡StBt-E
A1 SURFACE
N E75t'r5'E

5.0t.

N 0ftõ'00' E 55r.51' (cxr¡)
s.F,N. N 0f15'oo'E ¡f7-90'(cxM)
N 0,1'tõ'00' E

22.6ô'(CXU)
m. 3/1' tROil RoD (c)
NO TÄß VISIBIE
AT SURFÁôE
il 0r.lõ'o0'E 6tt2.E5' (c)
N 0fr5'0o'E 50r,s0' (cxil)
ïRACÍ. NO. 5532
su¡otw¡toNs oF sAil Jo QutN couNIy

INTERLAKE SQUARE
BEI{C A FoRtloll 0F toT I 0F Àr. t¡Rsoil,s
su_8ory{sro!¡ rN lHE SOUTHWEST t/4 0F SIC'I|ON t2,r. 5il.1.q. 6 E, rr.g,B. ¿ n, cfly 0F toDr, sA¡,t -
JoA0urN coutfTy, sTAtf oF cAUFonNlA
PittÞ ¡*
coNït r AssoctATÊs. tNc.

CML CONSULIII,IO EI{OINEEF
3ìU(lUl 0{m trl.u
SCÂIE: l'- 6{l'
BAISIS OF 8üflßcs:
1rË 8ASr3 0F EE RtñG6 Foi IHIS SUñrAt ßDG qtr{IERUNE OF pÁñ( SrRffX, ÁS SHotr¡,ON RTOORO OF SURì,EY, \DL J¡, PAG€ õ3, s¡r.c,n., vlHtcH BEIRS NoRDI E736'Jd EAm.
tlOilUilA.flst
+ SEf IRON RO4 Yf DIAI'EIER, 30'rcNq Un LS. TAß l{0. ¡l¡t79 + FR0ill l0f C0RNERS: SEI A CHTSEIED
CRoÉS ON A /r.od oFFlEf Ot{ rOI UNE
PROECnoil F(,i ¡ot coRr¡Ins.
_}- FOt,ND MONUUTNT'¡S NOIED
REFERE{CES:
(A) Mæ 1/t-91. s¿c.R.(ol ilárP il-3!: gJ.c.R.
(c) R.s. 92-65; s.J,c.R.
(D) 0.r{. 2æ3-00ô218(E) ü&P 3-6. s.,|.C.R.'(F) Mæ il-¡ô, sJ.c.i.(c) uæ tf-52, s,J.c,B. o.R. 3072-109

SACRAMENTO STREET
N 0õ00'00- E
ô'n N 0,+'15'00'
o.R. 246E-450 c'
s.,J.co. RECOnDS q H OCOO'OO- e
+78.3¡r'(M) BN 0,ft5'00' E
t.EGEND¡
s.,,.c.R.

R.S.

P,H.
lt ¡P,
P.U.E
(M)
FD.
s.F.r{.

CALC.
o.N.
8,0.8,
s.,J.co.
t.it.
o.R.

NOIEI:

Y RECORDS
B00t( - PAGE, sJ.c.R.
- PAGÊ, Sd.C,R.

UME - PAG€, S.,,.C.R.

60.47'(M)

60.15 (^)
I, A¡. DISÍA¡{CES ARE MEÂ!iURI:D UNTISS OIHTRIIYISE
NOIED.

2. REQUIREI'INTS OF THE IODI MUNIGIPAL CODE FOR
fHE DEoIO{ÍIoN OF RtcHÍ OF W y, EÀf¡El¡EilIs,
4q49qr!E!¡f 0F UN0ERGROUND iANKs Ar{D riEus,
PAyMEi¡f oF FEES A¡tD tN!¡f U¡lloil 0F OfF-sfrE
IMPROVEMEÍ{IS å',¡D UÌUNES HA\E NOT BEEN MEf AT
IHIS l'I¡¡E AND UI.,ST EE MgT PRION TO DEVEIOPMENT
OR ISSUAI{CE OF A BUIu)ING PERI¡IÍ OR WHIN
REQUE|íIq¡ Bt Tt{Ê cffY.

J. AI. RECORDS ARE OF SAN JOAqUIN COUNIY

4. REFER TO tENTAtfvE ltÁp NO. O5-S-OO!.L.o.rt'l
rw
(c)(M)
N 83'/

60.00'
FD. PK
MrL (c)

5.'rHE P.U.E DEotCÂltoN TO lïtE Cffy 0F Loot ctvEs
llE crIY.9IlNEiS 0F pu8uc ullrJItES, ANO OWNEiSgf cå8t€ w FmNcHts€s Tt{E R|0HT tô ÁCCESS, CONSIRUCT, I'AII{TÀN, II{SPESÍ. R¡PAIR, REP¡¡CE.

RA¡OVE, Al.tD opERArE fiEtn Élsun¡s tN Î{EP-U.es. NO 8Uil.OtNGS On SlRucruiEs St{ALr 8E collstRucrEo NoR sH lI At{ytHtNc 8E puNlED
W¡IlllH ItlE ElSEr¡Ef\lr WHrcH woUIO tlüf:ñFERE Wffi
THE USE OR OP€RATOI{ OF PU8UG UTUNES IN THE
EASEilEIII,

6. ãUllO|No Ar¡D SÌRUCruRES tN CONTORMANCE WTIH
CURRE¡II ZONINC AND EUIIOINC ONOIMNCES ARE
PERIIIÍTED IN l}IE OVERHEAO PUBTIC WlTJfY
EAIIEMENT TO A M¡IXIMUIT HEIGHT OF 2J FEEÍ.

SHEET 2 OF 3
N Oflõ'(x)' E 9ro8¡r' (CxM) - \ N OfrS'O{¡' E õOr.3o' (CXM) -s".
l'ol
t'-q
\B';
s.f'.N./ N 6755t0, E

20.1?'
o.R. JJE|-602 R's' 32-63
s.J.co. RECoRDS
R-20.0'. L-2E.9J E.oo' (Mla , S*I'
r{ orts'oo' E J¡r2.6!. (AXr¡) "*" t-1 / (c) FD. cHtsELEf) --\ J^ - -+' (c)
D.N. 2oo4-r7o5i4 loÍ t2
s.J.co, RECORDS
1t'
ldf 7
KESSEL SUBD,.M.LP. t1-32
s.J.co. RECoRD
s.F.N.
s.F-Nl

1.1 l+
50'
t2 t6
II IB
lo- I s¡r
I u.¿
I
A:

P,
'E
60 s
¡9
.s.F.N. I s.F.N.
\ "",, I "rn. ,
s 04'15'00- w 497.96' (M) cArC. FRoM (A)
4o - g7A ooSsooS-2
-7 \J -:o I
l,
il
s.J.co. REcoRDs l.

TRACT NO. 3552
suDDtvtstoNs oF sAN Jo outN couillY

INTERLAKE SOUARE
BÉNC A PORIK'II OT LOT I OF ÀJ. TÂRSON'S
SUBDMSION lN ÌHE SOtlllWEST l/,i OF SECIION t2,
T. JN., R. 6 E, rr.0.B. & M.. Ctï 0F LoDr, SAr{
'JOÁOUIN COUNIY, STATE OF CåUFONMA
ma$
c0Ìfi1 t AssocArEs, lNc.

CML COI,ISULTING AIGINEER
lllsc!ßormn rv, ¡6
SCÂIE: 1'- 30'
BASIS OF EAñNOS¡
IHE BAISIS OF BEARINOS FOR TI{IS SUf,VEf IS

TTIE CEN'ENUNE OF PARK SIREET, AS SHOIIN
ON RE(X¡RD OF SURI/EY, \IOL 52, PACE 65,
sJ.c.R.. llHrclr 8tÂRfì NoRlÌt a755'r0'EAsr.

MOr{Ur¡E}Í!*
-e-
SEl lRoN RoD, t/¡t' DlAUErtn J0'
LONC, WlfH LS. T ß l{0. ¡}¡179
+ FRoNT ror c;RNERs: sEr A cH'trro
CROSS Oll A ¡Loo'OFFSEÍ ON LOf LINE
PROJ8qïoil FoR tOI CoRNEñ.
-+.-
FOT ND IloNUl¡ENr ÀS NOIED
REFERÛ{CES:
(A) Mæ t¿l-gt, S.J.C.R.
(8) ll¡¡P il-It, S,,J,C,R,
(c) R.s.52-ô1 $J,C"R
lDl D.r,¡.2005-00821E
(el u¡p 2-ô s.J.c.R.I [ì t i 26.ô, Þ.u-E. NE¡t'oo'oo'w
'r.oo' -fr--rr.'oo'*v r.dp' I I ì
Noõoo'oot rs.Js'-¡ ì -
-ta-Ltu
ìl
¡l
snó !f--'f, I
9pl¡818f;1
gä\
zl !
ilItìlll
sl
!lÕ.t Ílrh
i^
ïqtÃi rrl
iq
I
I
I
2lol{tqi
8r
Zrlì
E10tl
ê,
frl
TEGENO!
s.,r.c.R.

R.S.

P,rr,
r,r.tP.

P.U.E.
fM)
¡D.
s.F.N.
cAt c.

D.N.
a.0,8,
s.,r.co.
t.N.
o.R.

NOtEfi:

SAN JOAOUIN Cd,NÎY
INSIRUMEIIÍ NUMETR
oFFrdAr REC!ñ0
+
N 0¡l¡15'0O- E
466.1{ +
478.54' (M)
+
sEf cHrsEr¡D cRoss
IN CONCREÌE AF
UTN6S CORNER 4.00'
NÛS.3E tT'tV
,t 00'
I. AtL DISI^¡¡CES ARE MEASURED UNTESS OIHERITISE
N0lE0.

E REQUIREI¡ENIS OF IHE LODI MUNICIPAL CODE FOR
IHE OEOICAIOI{ OF RIGHT OT WAY, EASEI¡ENIS,
A8ÂNDONIIEIÍf OF UNOERGNOUÑD TANßS ANO WEI.T-S.
pAn¡ENf 0F FEES Ar{0 ti¡Sf Lr^lloN OF oFF-SÍIE
rilPnwgtEl{ls AND unLmEs H vE t¡oT BEEf{ MEf
A1 mrs ÍrrÉ
^r{0
Mrrsl BE ugr PRIoR ¡o
DN'flOPMEI\IT OR ISSUAI.¡CE OF A BUII¡ING PERMff
OR WHTN REQUESIEO W fiE CffY.

3. ALL RECORDS ARE OF SAN .JOAOUIN COUI{ÍY
RECORfF.
¡[. REFER IO TEl.¡rAlrvE MAP N0. 05-S-O01.

I}IE P.U,E OÊDICAÎON TO 'I[IE CIIY OF LODI GNEi
IHE CffY, oviNÊRS OF PUBUC UnLfflES' Al'¡D
oWNERS 0F C¡8tE'lV FRAI¡|oH|SES IllE RrGHf m
ACCESS, CONSIRUCÌ, MANTAIN, INSPECI, REPAIR,
REPUCE, REI'OVE A¡ID OPERATE IHEIN FACII.JTIES III
lHE P,U,E'S. NO BUll.oINoS 0R SÍRUCIURES SHA|I
BE CONSTRUCÎÐ NOR SHAII ANYÍHINC BE PI.ANTEO
WIHIN ltIE EASAI$ÍÍ IIHÍCH WOUTD II{TERFERE.IVTTH
THE USE O8 OPERAÌION OF PUBUC UTTMES IN THE
EÀSB¡A{f.

BUIIONO AND STNUSTRES IN CONFORI¡AIICE WTH
CURREI{Í ZOI{ËIG Æ{D BUIIOING ORDIMNCES ARE
PERMfNEO II{ lHE ('VERHE^D PUSUC UNIÍY
EÀSA4E¡IT TO A I'Ð(II¡UM HEIGHT OF 23 FEEÍ.

SHEEÍ J OF I
so4'f5'0ol¡Y
I scHooL srREE,r

12.20' x 12.2t coRNER CTJToFF
OEDICATION ON THIS I¡AP
'Èaö4J'J7t ia.Er'
P.U.E
o\iERHAD oNLY
DE0tctlloN
inl
i'B-:
o.R. 528-476 & t.N. 81034312
I
I
I

20.0' P.u.E
0EorcâTt0N
D.N, 2004-1705f4
s.J.co. REcoRDs
o.N. 2005-008218
ö.i.cõ-neõõñõr +_F l'Åryrie|j_I I SEPARAIE DOCUilEHT
I I rN. ero6'8r2| -i-s.¡.co. nEconosrtf
Noaoo'oot ro.oo'l I

10.0'P.u.É.
0E0rcÂIr0N
ì i róõz-)
¡ L-:-
L .n-.r'
hñ
U
fL?-
'opon
lgr e
5,2C1 rq.
@
r-or n Ai{.0æ q. n v!
f.lltfl ¡q. lL l
I
H +vss'or'w t
40 - 818 oossoos-'
Z"un r
@

Y/NTAGE OAKS
A - POR SEC, 7 5, LJN.R.6E. M.D.8.8,¿ltl.

THIS MAP /S FOR
ASSESSMENT USE ONLY 058-64
lCíty of Lodi
tt' 89'
b
10'
aÐ
R. M. Bk. 10 Ps. 027
A-P. A. 8k. 2J Ps. 180
NOIE: Assessor's Porcel Numbers Shown in Círcles¡.

Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in Ellipsesr.

Assessor's Mop Bk.O58 Pg.64
County of Son Jooquîn, Calíf.
.,/.trà
{__7
' City of Lod¡ctrmunity Dewlopment Department Reæiwd: 'lc|/03¡!6 I{IGHÊST A.P.N. USED
YEAR PR. I PAR. I 'AR. I
06-07 t5
07-ß t8
OIÍNERS' STATEIIENTT
WE. THE UNDERSICNED, HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE AI-L-ÍHE.PARIES HAVINC äËôoiär-iiïiìäËäesi ìñ rxe r¡Ñö5 öÙeoMóEo AND sHowN-oN THls nML MAP äF":iìícä'ñ-o. äiài, súaoNrsroNd-or sAÑ JoA-oulN-ç!ur'ûY'."vrNrAGE oAKs' crY si.''sË:,',lll'"*lo[';19;-"'l,E!'31ç89'å$-19l¿ã"ËB'JJiT'"'i'^i3^ã'ül$' COUNTY. CALIFORNIA,
wE ALso oFFER FOR DEDICATION rO THE PUELIC FoE ?U-qH-q-ui.F- ALL PUBUC tifiLirv*-eeÈä.rËür's, ixe srnsEr nrcìnlïi:wÃv' rnÈ vr¡tmu-wtun uDENlNo oF ärcìii:oî:ñÄi ¡ir_óNc'-LowER s¡öñÀliÈmõ nóni, ¡Ho RqllFggrslt ro 1r{E crrY oF iàii'dr ¡öôËsfäro-rns- or ror-'-"1Ë ro ¡¡ró rRou t-oweR SACRAMENTo RoAD Ãi[ ¡slsow¡l oN lHls FIML MAP.

DATEo THts ZOth DAY oF f'1,11 ' 2oo5'
VINÎAGE OAKS, LP., A CALIFORNIA UMITED PARTNERSHIP

GENERAL PARINERS
BY: R, lHOl',lAS DEVEL0PMENT' lN
'@
TRACî No- 8482
ST]EDIIIISIONS OF SAN JOAqATN COANTY
VINTAGE OAI$
BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTH 5 ACRES OF THT WEST 20
ACRES 0F THE S0UIH 1/2 oF'tHE S0UÍIIEASJ )1!.9F.SECT|0N iå,'ìowñsnip s-r.¡oriH fr¡¡¡oE 6 EÆT, MoUNT DIAB^Lo.BÀsE AND -'uÈnior¡Ñ,
crTY oF LoDl, sAN JoAQUIN couNlf' cALIFoRNIA
APRIL, 2OO5
SHEET NO. I OF J SHEFTS
1ENÍAÏVE ùIAP APPUCATION NO. OO4-S-OOE
ENCINEtRIN(,rttc.
äã'iõä u-r¡¡rôiã¡- öitoË; ¡it arY atE.lDrDlns ncnsro, aDPLìcaBLE Ar rHE ÎlltE tr APPñOVAL OF fiÉ TEffiAllvE rtP. -..\\Itr$tlllll,trrlrr,,- DATED THts -?þ- o¡'t 9¡ Sre\-¿¡lotr, 2005.

S""-X<-Z.i,s==
susAl,l J. BLACRSrON, cllY CLERK
AND CLERK OF THE CÍTY COUNCIL
!
suRviYon's sr¡rEunNTt
rTTIS U¡P WAS PREPAREO BY ME OR UNOER MY DIRECT¡ON.AND
,Ë"Ëoåiä iíåäru'ä ÈirLo sun¡rv rN coNFoRMANcE rvllu THE h-niüi-nîieinõ oÈ ntE suaovlslot'¡ MAP Acr Alio-LocAL
ôRõÍ,üñöE ¡i rHe nÈoussr oF vINTAGE oAKS' LP'.oN..-
Ãä;Ä#;t; ano¿- ¡ ùpneav slAtE 'IHAT THls RNAL MAP
?PF,î#',$iåu¡Ë53i'i'it3'^Ë"'Î9-'ixf HÈl{â!i,üi''ü.-
siö;iñ]'üeiËöñ'wiú-'Ël oi ittÈ cHAFAcTER AND qqg!ry..UE ËöËrilãñl rärilìlrito e-e?o¡le sAlo suBDlYlsloN-lMPfiovEMENrs iñË'Åóõ¡piÈo-eY rHe cnY or LoDl, AND THAr sAlo
il'ò-rúir-iiñls ïrrr- aË'surncler¡r ro ÊNABLE THls SURVEY To BE REÍRACED.
oo*olo,, l9+h onv or 1,3¿tt , zoos'
rn¿r 0 An,;.$ 0g,tMtcffiL DAvtb JoNES, L6i¿ 6173
LrcÊNge EXPIRATIoN DAftt 3/31/06
i
!
pusúc. ionlts lnncnon's stlîEMENT,
r. RrohRo c. PRIMA, JR., HEREoY sr lE THAT l AÌ''! tlg.... iiugùb'tùóRKs óì'fiÈcrón'o¡ rHE crrY oF L00l' -cÉùlFoRNtA iñõ ñÁii-r¡ve EXAMINEo rHls R¡l,cL MAP oF "TRAcr No' -
ùä2. öüsôMsroHS oF sAN ,JoAQUIN couNrv' vNr4gE-.o.¡lf 'ðËfbÈ-Lõ-ói. -o'ir:Éonr¡n rlo n¡¡r THE sugolvlsloN s-HowN- üËÉ¡õñ iJËÜesruTn-lv rue sAME As lr APPFAREo.oN-IHE
TËiùñirvÈ-úÞ;;ñri'Àñi ¡ppnoveo ALTERAToNS rr{EREoF- I
-FõäìfiËilsä\iÉ ri¡ãr'rHts nl¡t- urp coMPLlEs wlrH- ÄLL..TIJE þËôü3iôHõ'öi rm-Ë ie br rHE LoDl MUNIcIPAL coDE'-AND
ü;V'äräñóul¡në' rxghero, rppucAgtg ArrHE TIME 0F
¡PPROVAL OF lHE 'ÍENTAITVE MAP.

DATED TH|S 1o*^ dnV Of rvroS - '
ZOoS'
FARMERS & MERCHANÍS BANK OF CENÍRAL CALIFORNIA' BENERCIARY ,r,.'âlr* 4'-'An *
l-4ø44 taL¿Í¡, svP
O.ÍNERS' ACKNOÍI,EDGEIIßNT:

SIA'IE OF CATJFORNIA
couNTY oF 9a¡J Joao,'4
si#ffi-Éffi
ffiü:ffiErl
THE INSÍRUMENT.

WINE$S MY IßNO:
) K îfr'ú'vurÁ '
r.Yr¡nv pualIc lN ANo FoR
THE ABOVE-MENÍIONEO STATE

AND COUNTY
MY COMMISSION E\PIRES: 4-2347
MY coMMrsstoN NvMStFg J-tot¿Lþ.-
BENEFICIARY'S ACICiIO'ÍI,EDGEIIENI:

STA'fE OF GqTJFORNIA
DATED\'ÌHIS l:3]l-fi¡s ¿.44 DAy or S¿ørr¡sß .
ffi
couNrY oF 5oÂ-$nü4-
thËi{ñ:çÊîid' liE rHË
-prisci¡¡(o) Únose uuelr¡ ls,/¡ñ. su-BscRlBED T0 IHE
-wüä¡iîrísñlulnr, rno-¡crHò'Ár-Eóego 1o ME iuer ¡r¿g¡i41ry ExEctmD rHE iäilËìü'iiilliå1firln ¡uruonlzi:ï-cÞrõrwçree¡, eno'nar BY Hrs/l'rER¡üËi ääùruRËtÃí òî"nrl rrsrauuEHirnÈ prnsoÑ(e),
-o¡. :ï-q.-ENTiT r uPoN BEHAIT
oi'wi¡Ctr iÉe-ÈeRsoN(*) AclEo, EXEcUTED rHE INSIRUMENT' CÍTY CLERK'S STAÎEMENT: ),t
rHrs rs To SIATE THAT AT lls REGUTARLY HE|D MEEIING-ON THE-.âl--u¡r òiË"iís;tü=h.Z:, zoos' tÏÈïtw couÑol or rHE ctTY oF LoDl' õÀLrrtñftËÞñov¡o rurs nñ¡r- u¡p oF "lRAcr No' õ4o?r.suoDlvlsloNs oF iu,¿'+s'ul,',t',m NP'+,'å
",î$fr
FH "',i.tg:liqË[iüft ür - -6*gö¿xghÈ#,,ru?$,J'*qåEËuff '"llB"l'g¡93!.iüF-Ë.iöi ió'rd-{D-tnói arv*En saóiliËnó ¡oro Aras qqowil-.9r rnrs FrtlAL Ñ ;údiüË¡iöïtc óîFÈi õlöËiién¡ol or rxe griEer ir0nÍ-0F-vrav''ñ'o äie úli¡úriFrìr¡n- wruxrne a n¡osr-ol-!Lll!'!9 -t¡!Eñ;Äãnü¡åö'io¡D óù¡lÈoi rü ölúsltóim cor4gno.¡1 or¡¡çovErÆx¡s iilffiõÉ õrio gnlernrcxrs-o-È:l¡ú ä æco¡$¡gq ry.:lrLJ ll-t,,-

PUBUC WORKS DIRECTOR
nÈõsrn¡lotl ExPtRATIoN DATE: 3/3
i
q!¡ultv .gunv¡von's srrrnu¡'tl'¡:
,ee' t l?Ø
FtLiãStHåÈaRDER - couNrY .LERK
ßECORDER'S SIATEIIENT:
ffii,if.oþßfiï',,,
16ldt2w @talP F..tll,n
trg. t of 3
R.æ¡d.d ¡ñ Offlêlâl n.cord¡
Costy ol SD Jô¡fl|ñmY!- mm¡!36loF-R.cordctsCMtv C¡.rkÞ¡rd bv gN d Dffif ilililililt ilfr tillilt tüt ]ilil til ililt flil|il
coín¡¡å.r, l4tôllltlobfltr¡ú.cdoñb
My coMMrsstoN ,*r,nrs' lVtrf¿l''t lZfOOl
MY coMMtsstoN NUMBER: I tl-l l, ll A
D.D. SHEET NO. 154
TOKAY DEVELoPM'NI' .lNc.

I.'ÍHOMAS R. FUNN, HEREBY STA'IE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED
ft{ü'ËitlL MAtôÈ-"rmcr no. J482, sugolvlsloNs oF sAN
iö¡oúrN coÚrn, vNfAGÉ oAKs, cnr oF Loor, c4!EqB!$
iün'iüifiui èirFnMsnN sHowN HEREoN coMPUEs llffH
.SAN JOAQUIN COUNTI' CAUFORNIA
-IlJ'cl I
'$
\
1[_\
R
4O- 21 oo4soo'_l
FoUND /+' l. RoD(R3)
N8C12'15-W 0,15'
CENTURY BLVD.

FOUND BOUÍ AT CENTER
oF sEcÍoN 15(R5)
D,D, SHEEÍ NO, 154
SAN JOAQUIN COUNIí
cmr oF LODI
FOUND
'TAGGED
PER M&

40.00'
I¡
^H þ- 30.00'
9r ll "^-^.
.P.r I | il/ pp "â-r
I
ål lÞpmcEr- t oF p.M. z¿-ls M&P' 36-ll
Ël ll i*ärio"ioÃ''"ir"tit RrGHï-'F-wAy) ¡
Ë: ll r
ãËlil,Z ', ll tallo
E çl il=
= 3l ll
P.M. ¿z-ss I
^t
R.s. zs-ros Ë I
ã rl il; Ek-s'croNr+l llo
ã äi ll e!
Ir il e$¡Þl rlTo"tuum B-.
"
Ê El lÍ M.s,p. 31-ss g I
É ã Þl I I
-FouNo
Y+" r. RoD(Rl)(Rr)
Ñ
pR lll/ **" 'RoD(RlxRr)
I: Ë
-t
| | ,-ñgui¡.t-"
,. RoD(RlxRr) le8
Ë : tl Y
-
s'sio,24"E 26s2.68' sasio'oe"E 26s2.72.(R1xR3) -t i $* g Eg liffivr*A* 'AKS
couRr cnoruLnE-/
IEE 3l8B
äËrmvrN**
'AKS
couRr
B.s.3s-s'
i
I
i {i*1 tl--=.*.,u* ?l5Pl éV Ñ:
cF@l sl
'Ët l"'il:'J:î,'#*' i
I
gt
M'oY' t t-t¿ë .l I
,/a sEcroN u¡re-l ãlu \i gle V<-çru¿'¿.
'fË/|ãi3l;Èl âl
cr | Ëi /#ll',1 I sEcroNLlNE- -1, sÈcrc
f$=. .
-. -1. .N9*îrg.g'riq). -\. rgeggor"Jv 26s.5.rr(r,r .::ïÌ i.Jd :t:1 FD. EMpry MoN, Box ATl I s.F,N. AT sEc, coR,--/ -
/+ SEcIloN CORNER | ,,abr,ru , ^r¡F SECTION 22 SECTK
!l 6i ¡/.&p.3e-s4 M.&p.3e-6s F¡ -FouNgr : ' i,¡, , ,oo.i E¡ I ;. I FißÌÈ
zl I Èt I SEc.
cALLEo s.J. BRAss HARNEY LANE
MONUMENT STAMPED "LS. T.3N.,R.6E.223e"(Rr) u.o.g.aM.
fl tRoN RoD
R.C.E. 19658
F 31-63(R1xR5)
StAlr l' = 200'
SEE SHEEÍ 3 FOR LEGEND AND
TRACT No. 3482
SUDD'I/ISIONS OF SI¡,¡ JOAQUIN COUNTY
VINÍAIGE OATCI
-a
BEING A PORTON OF lHE NORITI 6 ÂCRES OF THE YiESI 20 ÂCRES oF fHE SoUTH 1/2 OF lll1 SOWHEASI I/4 0F sEcTloN 15.
rowñsnp ¡ xoRÍH, RNce 6 EÁsr' MoUNI DIÁBLo BASE ND
úenrot¡¡t, ctw oF LoDl, sl¡l ,ioAoulñ couNIY' cAtlFoRNlA APRIL' 2OO5
SHEET 2 OF 3
REFER fO TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATION NO. OO4-S-OO8
lHE I¡ORI}I IIIIE OF IHË SOIJTHEâST QUARIEN O¡ SECTON 15 lvHICH Büns souH scl?15' EÀsI AS SHOITN 0N IHE lrAP EtrJ lN B00l( 22 óF p¡nca unps, AT PAcE 65, sAll ,,oAQull'l couNrY RgcoRDs. (RÐ RECIRD PtR R.S. J5-58
(R2) RECORD Pfi: M.&P, 37-98
(RÐ RECoR0 PER: P.t¡. 22-65
(Al¡ REC0RD PtRr M. & P, 17-128
insi [N. 9æ7sst5 (stg NoTE 5)
Y/ rRoN RoD
R.C.E 196¡E(R2)
q
I
I
=T
,E'ò
õg
'õ
4 23)N
Y¿" IRON ROD
D'R.C.E. 1963d
rLY 34.00' FROM
)oRNER(R2) oN
N UNE
rTi_ _
0-27 A
Llô-?7å,o..,.oo
{Zsq1,Þ{¡r__€e.os.

VINTAGE OAKS COURT iì--*----€lJ14 ^ N8910'2{W 208.40'_
NOR¡II LINE OF .fHE SOI,rTH ONE-HALF
OF THE SOU.ÍIìEASI QUARTER OF SECTION 15
620.34'(M) 620.52(R4)
I
FoUND r-1l4"
PER R.S. 4_14
NOdOO'¿1/W O:
o.23{Rr)

IRON PIPE
r. RoD(RlxR3), No TAc
1 58.O2',
t.N. 92041548, s.J.ç,R.
s8910'2{E
I
z,õ
=lôõt. r
ëã la s
l'l: ã
I
40'
I
I
20'lI--EXISfiNG 20'r ô-N. 20O4-C2
P.U.E,
t1207
04080
ffi
scAtt l' = 40'
Étu
oÉ
ots
ul
={a
É¿
ãÊi
n$-o^J>
¡o
u?
oN
D
rouNo 7r' REBAR NoûOO'll
OF PROPERÎY CORNER (NO
É
¡oo!
oNÐ
Ê
n¡ol
oNn
U
T-
3ooboa
@L.)
I
Lo
fÐ
.4
FOUND 5/f I, ROD
TAGGED "R.c.E. 1268d(R4)
N8908'3dW O.19', 1
LEGEND: .

P.U.E. PUBIIC ullufY ElsEt'ltNt
s.J.c.R. sAll JoAQUt¡l cotJl'llY RECoRDS
M. & P. ttAPs N0 PlÁÌs, 800K-PAGE S'J'C'R'
S.N.F. SFÁRCHED' T'IOT FOUND
--------r.-- FOUND M0t¡uMffi Âs N0lE0
------@-- FOUNo MoNUUEI{Í ltt MolluMEl{T llEtl As NüfE0 (R) DIT0IES MDIÁI BEÂRNG UNE
(-f) Df!¡olEs REc0RÞ DAIA ND REfÊREl{clNG DocuMСf
Q DR¡orEs cINIERUNE 0F SrREÉf
n]s. DENotEs REcoRD or s,RúEY, Bool(-PÀcE, sJ'c'R'
P.I¡, DÐ,IOIES PÁRCEL MAP, B()OK-PACE, SJ.C.R'
(r¡) MEÂSUREÍ)

8.0. DS¡0IES 8RÆS DIST (SEE MoNUM${TS SEf)
I.N. DÊNOIES INSÌRUMÉ.ÍÍ NìJilBER
D.N. DTNOIE; DOqJME¡¡T NUMBER
w.c. Du{o]Es Y{fÍNESS CoRNER
-777m7r DEllotEsßEslRlcIEDÁCCESS
oa*ra
GR0Ss.
îú'å3åf fl i3I"3i^.'l!',"ìF'ff'åJF:åã5o'ff'J Ik*ti""'
2005.

3. 'ÌHE P.U.E. DEolcArloN GlvEs 'tHE cttY, owNERs gf Îy-9.llc-- frim.Es iú,¡ö oúñÈnS
-or cnsLr t.v. FRANcHISES IHE RIGHT-To-
mf'kæåT,Tl¡''f SüHt''lì''f; Í.%üEl'ii$ö:Ð:Lfórti%'-'
ffiuõiu-åËË sHIiL' ¡iÉ Cõñstnucr¡o NoR sHALL ANYrHlNq*B!-..

ËiÏirídõ''inHiñ" iHE-øseueur wHlcH wouLo INTERFERE Ì{ml'lHE ü#'älriËËn¡ioñ-oF púauc unurlEs lN rllE EASEMENT'
ffis*ffçs,$i'ffi;-
REAUESÍED BI THE CIII.

5. ÌHERE EXISrS A 1'OO' GAP BENilEEN PROPERTIES CREATED gY äür'ri'üEdólìóé+ ó.n' soz AND 1151 o'R. e' s'J'c'R'
8l
9,2O4
SQ. FT,.

MONUMENTS SET:

JÆ RE8ÀR, 2f tol,lc, c,ÁP ÄrTAcHEo Á¡lD sIA¡rPÐ'Ls' 617t sHollN IHUS:---o- å*lWffi ð'',fssffifir'ffiff [di{Tgt[ffi
'Td['ffi',
ft ''lí*f'ffi t"iÉffi ffiH¡'
SEI A 2,(}O' TJIIIIISS CORNER ON tOT [.T'IT PflOJESIION FOR FRONÍ LOf CORNERS FACING A ROAD|ïAY (A80VE UENn0NED BRÀSS DISK)
r/f REÊIR. 2f t0N0, c,ÁP AnAcllEo 4il0 sfÁl¡PtD 'LS' Sf7f, ÏlLl BE SËI AT À l'00' omËf 0N iôi uiËòË ñstn-Loimi¡rns. silorñ{ IHus: ---f--
t¡ot{uMBlt Box ITITH ABwE-t¡t}'llloNtD V{ R€8ÀR olclosED, sHoriN ftluS: ----@---' UNtSiS O'til€R'llsE NOIED
BASTS Or BEARINGS:
ïHE NoRtlr uNE 0F IHE solrlHFlsl QUARIER OF SEcION ',15 tttlgtt-9qF$.yrH 8912',15' E¡Sl üis'ùöü,i'oî'î¡Ë illöñÉö'iÑ eooriäiiàÁËËi-äipb, Ài É¡cÈ os, sÂN JoAfl,N couNfY REcoRDs. w.c. (8.D.)
I N89'02'r8'W 2.00'
15 8,010
so. FT.
11 a,446
sQ. rr.
l-woENlNG I ! ctrY oF Loot
l:'ï-ï,'' --l | 'gor -
I VARIABLE-WDIH l.- a' p.u.e.

N89'08'3CrW 210.02'
'sEr w.c. (8.0.) AT
N89',08'3CrW 2.00'
l.N. 920-i8915, s.J.c.R.

SEE NOTE 5
roulfil/T T -no-bGð - -
NO TAG, SOUTH 0.25' OF
PROP. UNE
=t{
ôobÒz
l3
12,305
SQ. FT.

W-C, AT
ñ4525'39'E 2.oo'
12 11,254
sQ. Ft
11 10,530
s0, Fr.

I
oÉ
bg
@rô
íìl
-g;lEnr
.El
SAN JOAQUIN.COUNTY

UMTTS UNE
REFERENCES: .
lRll REcoRo PER; R's. 35-58
inzi REcoRo Pm: M.&P. ¡z-gE
in¡i RECoRo PtR: P.l¡. 22-65
Ìnri RECoRD PtR: u' & P' 17-128
ii¡í l.N' s2o7oels (sE NolE 5)
TRACT No' 8182

SUNDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQAIN COUNTY
VINTAGE 0A¡6
=
OSI¡¡G A PORTION OF IHE NORIH 5 ACRES OF THE VIEST 20 ACRES "'ãi iìe-sóuix 1/z oF lHE soulHEAsr l/4 0F sEcIloN 1.5' rän¡rinÈïÑorií[ nmct o usr, Moui¡r DüBLo B'sE.ÄNÐ
'iËiröH, clä ör loot, sm ¡oeoutn couNrY' cALIFoRNIA
APRIL' 2OO5
SITEET 3 OF 3
REFER TO TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATION NO' OO4-S-OO8
I
I
D.D. SHEEI NO. 154

LINE TABLE

I INF LENG'ITI
L1 7' N8f 10'2
L2 3.90' N8959't:

L5 4.64', NAS59'll
lrojffl ¡,on 0F }Mol,tfl HAr¡
of ÍrrD sotnlalsl QUIIÎIR 0r$cnoI tõ, L3 ì.,R.0 8.. X.D.B.& ro. ll'not
ll3t10'531
PARCIL 2
?r52 SQ. r'T.r
süï Jl !.0ü iHSüt
tüT
.J
ROD

0.31'
@-\
--:l
T,EGEND:
s.F.ll. SEARCHED, mWD ìfotlil¡tc
PD. .t'ou¡tD
sEc. s8c1l0¡¡
P.M. PARCSL HÄP
RS. RECORD OT SURVEY
lt,& P. ItiPs ÄilD PIATS
REI'. ., NE¡'ERENCE

8.0.8. 8ÂStS0¡'BEARTNCS
P.U.E, PUBIJC UI]I^TTY EÁSE¡{ENT
v/ ' RwrNçrED
^CCrñ
o sEr 3/4'x 30' tRoN RoD cAppDD AllD S.TAMPED
LS.7889, UiltEss 0tltERHtSE il0TED.
o FÛ, UONU¡IENT Âs NoTßD.

RET'ERENCgS
O p.¡{. ?t-65
@ uuim.zr
I
4â
b
E
ã
ç eisã F,s
= *l!!
ãelsI -'tãlÈ
l'
s 8fioaT (9.0,8,) 158.02'
ì 89r0'21T t58.{r2'

VIMAGE OAKS COURT
JUNE, 2OO5 SCÄI,E:

O
Ê4
oF-
4 15.¡
:ã
Ê4()
(/-j
t,Ê{
=oÞl
BASIS OF BEARIIIOS;
Ilg glslg _on!DÄÌü{cs FoR mls suilDr ß fl{r r{onrï HxE or næ soi¡r¡ ur¡ oE;mD son'Hnlsl quåxÍßR 0F sîc1ror r5. rs slortr ni¡"n"t i, ;o:ài m i'iËiî,¿in i..

I
,! flcüT_0I'_ÍrY
*$)"ilr-ri f.i¡:t-C,n"*È
N l" I ' ïltf**t I)43($'
I r.rrr ra
--------'
r. RE'ER m c'ìï 0F r,'Dr#f#*L ÁppucATr'¡¡ r 05-p-00s.
¿. rll REFÉREilCBS ARE m sÀ]t JoAquil couMÏ RBC0RDS AHD BOOI( ()R VOII,'XE PRECEDH! PÀCE.

3. At¿ DISTAT{EES TRE IITASURBD UNLMS fiHERIIISE NOTED.

1. lTtE p.U.t..I)E0tcâT10il m mE fiI 0t D¡t ctvF Tl.tE tTIr,omEns 0¡ fl1gqgrrlTrn oÌlrns 0r' crBr^r r.r mrrulsd'ruð'ftiöñi ildisscotsrlucl, u[nlfi, nsprfi, nrpilR, n¡euc¿ izuöib] iffi"oplnirË*,m{n-.Sgn¡r¡s l{ flr p.u.Es. no ¡ulrÐxcfbn flülfü;iús-inil"gl.llrq4yclll ton $Hrr¿ ilyÍÍlrc sl Þunùó ïnrñi ffi'üitimn rucn I9lirl.tr.nnm ïil mx $E 0R oplnllror{ or njäiî rnfrm'ffiü"' ","",' ÍtE H$¡|BìT.

6. I$ryqruE 0F fi[ l¡Dt rw0lpil, pqE-r,oR 1ÏE D[ÐtcÀrot{ 0r,Rt0Hn_0¡,_rAyn{D ¿Nnmrs. ÆrxDotlrurr m wo¡ncrornm- üiní riö:';Èiìsi pi'iü¡iñ-öi-mm ülD mstutn0il 0p 0t't-s¡t8 smE¡f
gs-n{nru i'nn ú,'di'ü'"ffi pff-'îFäffiriß,IH1Rfli# H^t*BUnDrilc pmyn 0n nEil Rsqu¡smD ¡r m irnìi;ilic¡rs rîiöi: " " . l' ., ...'i, ., 1,., ì
ffiiffiHffiffi
lbË,ilT#f ü¡tffii''flr,ff ffißr,?åilgß'"u'r,',
IrD_SUqI4!_ql4rqq srcRåutùm nom,næ'reä-iin äi
#ffffiffiF;3t"ffiJffiffi;#ffiffi'
IttsD THs tgÀmy or-@gßg4- ¡nal'
RBCORDAR'S SÎÂÎEHNNT:
* \r|^*r- -r-*r-., zo4 n
-
y. tn aoox
2? oF pAncßr HAps, ¡r prcn /3? ,lr me n¡qu¡sr o¡',./ ¡osHut cooK Et,golt, :
f=
Is
:

J
SfAIE OP CAI¡FORNIA
c0ú-NrY-îF
s\pR0'Dm{e00l\0{l0Ad¡a\0lt0a-ru'dr¡ ¡Ollelü +shn'ËËfiûs-heB:ottol-ttc.¡r otr0t-treô-*trr ott*-!ry.d,r 0'ot-tù2r-}r-,,-pt¡-p.Dts D.D. sHmT t5 OI'INIRS' STATÈIÍ [Iú?:
' llilltE uIDEffitslrED, HERDBY srATr lltÄT vE ÁnE Âr¿ IHE pÁtllEs ltwütcREctRD ImJ ttrrrtBsT l¡t THE t^AtrDS SUBDMDm ¡un .ciñN älñi"""*p*¡3 .11.n¡..1.yryqtrytrq ${és ¡u'ñrùildï}öïiffi¡r' ä:ü ädl{lcs-!¡!p u¡o rrc Hnnusr coilltilT ró,-íüú-pñDpüulüärir,ö'rilä or Hll#r:ll,*f_,^*
THB oÍ'Frcu or rHe coitrr'ñ'Elliñïõfr öi;ïää^curì{, COUTN" CAUFOXMA. ilwsiL$ ,'or¡'sR'
trffi ,itrB-üsldf,
o,g$8ä;'fl
,T$"[,fiïgfl#^'rffi$;ff"';ìH'.f *'",1,,tr.":
i'.tr'&üûffi ffi äïefüJj."f-,1'll,'J"'l*'*nïiplff g;'m, ÄND Fnoü r¡rrgn sAcRÀuENTo RoÁD, ArJ, Às suorr oñ'nrl pläisi'Hlp:" {oHN D. CEnUC¡( ÀND BÀßB/IRÁ l, C¡nt^lcK TRU$|I8ES 0F
CERI,ACI{ FAIIITY UVINC,ÏRUSI, DATßD ¡'ÎBRUÂRY ?, I99I
nono nns¿5$n oFôcjl"kr- , zooá.
2t- ¿
t0'
.-_--_'-'-
iogflu cooK Rt^sott, tsjsm

VICINMY MAP
BIcHARD c. pntHt, JR, \h.c.s. eotm
PWUC 110B¡6 DÍRECTOB H OMCIO øY
OF TÍIE C1TT O¡' I¡DI
.,.,. nECISIRÁîoil EfrPIRÄrI0t¡ DâTB: 3-Bt-06
,rfitm PÜBUC tlt tltD ¡'0R ITE
ADon-ImfloilBD SIAm AilD CoutlT
¡rY coll¡tssror wnæ, /â.3-Ct5

PORTION

OT' THE

SECTION

CITY OF LODI,
POR. S. I'Y.
^-I.iAKESHORE
1 /4 SEC. 1 1 r.JN. R.68. , M.D.B.&M.

PROPERI/ES

THIS MAP /S FOR
ASSESSMENT ¿JSE ONLY 031-33
Zrsn 'u
Hln 't2 þ (KET%EMAN UNE)
City of Lodi, Community Development Department, Received 1111812005 HIGHEST A.P,N. USED
YEAR PAR. # PAR. # PAR, #
06-07 n

CIW OF LODI
Assessor's MoP Bk.3O1
County of Son Jooquîn,
P9.33
Colif .

A-
8-
c-
023
110
125
R. M. BK.

P, M. BK.

P. M. BK.
40 Pg.
22 P9.

O7 Pg.
bq
\¡
b
42'
tr¡G,o
(.f)
rtt:<
S
68'
NOIE; Assessor's Porce! Nurnbers Shown in Circles'
Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in f//ipses'
1o-e3
TRACT NO. 3õ1õ ENGINEERS SIAIEMENTi
]HIS T¡AP YíAS PRTPARED 8Y UE OR UI{D€R MY DIRICTON,I AXD IS EASfþ UPOI{ A FIEI¡ CJRIEY IN CONFORI,IÂI¿CE $IH lHE REQUIRil.IÐJIS OF IHE S1'EDIVISIOI¡ MAP ÂCT ÁilD LOCAL ORDINNCI AT iHE REQUEST Of DAVIO S. vlìISO{ ON UARCH I1, 2005. I HERTBY STÀlE IHAT ¡HIS FINAL MÂP SUESTATITAIIY COT,IFORMS IO IHE COIIDITOI'IAUY ÁPPßO\iEO TENÌANVE IIÂP, ATL MOIUUIT{IS ARE OF'IHE OIÀRACTER ANO OCCUPY IHE POSIÌìO'IS INDICATID AIIO ÁRE SUMO$¡T TO TJ¡¡ABtg lHE ST'RWY IO BE RÉIRÀC€o.

STATEMENT: $,BDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNW
I..AI(ESHOBE PROPERTIES

BEING A PORIION OF THE SOUIHI,IEST QUARIER OF
sEcÍloN 11, T.5N., R.68,
M.D.B.&M.,
clTY oF LODI, SAN JOAQUTN COUNTY, CAUFoRNIA
DII,ION & IITIRPE|Y
CONSU¿7TNC C'Wt EIVG/NEERS
EN6,NEER/NG . PIANN/NG ¡ SURI¡ÐíNG
ïE, l}IE UNDERSIGNEÐ, HERTEY STA]E 'fHAT IIIE ARE AIl- IHE PARIIES HAVINO RECORO ¡ItE INIEßTST IN THE LANOS STIBDIV¡DTD AI¡Ð $IOIfr.I oit IH|S RNAI UAP 0F 'ÍRÀCT N0. J515, SUÊÐiVlSlollS 0F SÀli ''oAQLllNcouNTy, LAKESTioRE PRoPERIEy, cllY 0F 1001, cAuFoRNlA, ANo k € HIREBY CO'¡SENT IO 'fHE PREPARA'IION ANO RUNG OF IH|S RNAL MAP IN 'fHE OFFICE OF 'IHE COUNIY RECORDER OF SAN .JOAqUIN COUNIY, CAUFORNIÂ.
; oono nrs ltú oo, n 4/rr/ , r*u.
oo,ro o,r- å!il^, oF AF;-l_-
./^ ¿,- h)¿,?t/,*,
SANDRA IY. I.III-SOI{, AS OTINER
, 2005.
r(//i7.r^'-
APRIL, 2OO5
SHEET I OF 2
cÊot DILoN R.c,E 25835
RESSTRApil EXPIRÂ1¡gil DÀlE: 12-31-05
o¡no nrs?úùo¡v o, A?ilu , r*u.

PIACIR S1ERRA BANK, A CAUFORNIA BATIKINC CORPffiAIOI'I, SI'CCESSOR BY MERCSß IIIIH EANK OF LODI, N.4,, A NATOÌÌIAI BÂI¡K]NG ÂSSOCIA¡O{, AS BTXEFIOABY
I
N
I
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORS SIATEMENT:

5.'* Ic l*å¡ru ooou,"1¡""fr fl?"171'âî7'Ê
'*ritnififfiffi*

VICINITY MAP
r, ntc*dno c. pRttrl, .JR., HtRrBy SÌAIE IHAT r AM rHE puBuc rvoRKs OIRECTOR OF 1IÊ CITY OF LODI, CÂUFffiMA AND ÌHÂT I HAIE ÐOI,IIÑED IHIS RNAL MAP OF "TRACI NO, J5I5, SJEOIVI$ONS OF SAN .'OAOI'IIN COUNTY, LÀKESTIORE PROPERTES', CIfY OF LOOI, CAUFORNIA
AÐ THAT THE SJEDIVISION SHOIIII HEREOI{ IS S,|BSTNTAIIY THE SAIIE AS IT APP€AREÛ OiI IHE IÚ{TANVE MAP, AND ANY ÀPPROVED ALIERAIICIIS IHEREF, I FURTTIER STAIE ]IIÂT IIIIS FINAL I¡AP COUPUES IIIIH ÄT THE PRO\4SC$¡S OF I1TI¡ Iô OF THE L@I MUNIOPAL CODE AND AT.IY ÂMB.IDMINTS THERETO, APruCABI.E AT]HE IìME OF ÀPPROVAI Of 'IHE TR{TAIIIE MAP,
olno r¡ts 23'-J DAy oF S€p¡r¿rós¿R ,2005,
Scnnrfìq?a.¡ìlut..

N.T.S.

CITY CLERK,S STATEMENT: t Í*à-,rl+rl
RtstAR0 c. PRTMA, ,n,, R.C.E. 28t83
PUBUC Y'tRKS DIRECI0R
REclslRÀtloll EXPlRAlloil DAIEI 3'?l'uL
Ou-zu
u últloS , BEFoRE ME,
AppEAútD'pAvrD s. vilLsoN Ar'tD Sl
NOTÂRY PUBLIC, PTRSOTALLY
COIJNTY SURYETORS STATEMENT:;ËñËõffip s. vr'úou- üiil5¡ffiu-uçpu , pRovED To uE oN IHE BÁss oF sAnsF¡cloRy ÊMÍ)€I,¡CE TO BE lHE PERSOI'IS IITIOS€ NAI¡ES ARE SUBSCRIB¡D fO lHE IIì]HIN INSIRUMA'II, ANO ÀqfiOY{TDGEO TO ME ÌHAT 1HEY ÐGCUTEÐ lHE SAMI IN I}IEIR ÂUIHORIZEO CAPAOTES, ANf) IHAT BY ìHEIR SGTATURTS OI'¡ IHE INS'IRUMEilT IHÊ PERSOI,IS, OR AE B'IATY UPOI{ B€HAIF OF H}IICH 'IHE PERSO{.IS ACIEO, EXEd,IED .IHE
INSìRUMENT. o¡reo nrs ?-G ¡¡v sr98&^qf 2005.
t,
.IHOI,IAS
R. FUNI.I, HEREBY SÍAÌE THAI I HAVE EXAMINEO 'IHIS FINAL MAP OF .IRACT NO. ¡5I5, SI'SOIVISIOI{S OF SAN JOAqJIN COUNTY, IÀKTSHOR€ PROPERNE$, crw 0F toDt, cAuFoRNtA AND rHAf tHÊ suBolvlsoil s$olr¡ HEREoN cor¡PilEs Ûr'tH AtL tHE PRovl$oits 0F CHAPÍER 2 0F iHE CAUF@N|A SrJBÐ{VlSofi UÄP ACf, AS AMEJ{DED, AND THÀT IHIS RNAL MÀP IS IECHNICAI"¡-Y CORRECT.

ABOVE-UÊNIIONTD STÀTE ÂNO.COUIIITY^
MY coMtlrssoir unars: /å/17/08
onnus //Ûs¡y6 duNâ ,2s65.
dú'/*3
1fy nouls R; FuNN, RcE 2J¡4r
, COIJNÍY SURVEYOR OF SAN JOAO{JIN COUNIY, CÀUFORMA
REGISIRAI0I¡ EXPIRAnoN DÂtEr 12-51-05

STA'TE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF PIACER
ON 6pß,! r¿,å-E ,-BEFORS.ME, E.\AFY , NOTÂRy PuBUq pEfiSOa{A¡¡y ÀWÊ|\REO 9.. tT J+øLT tt}u.s , PRoVED f0 t¡E ot'l IHE 8A$S 0F SAIISFACToRY EvlDtlCE r0 st IHE PtRso¡¡ vlllost NAME ls srBscfiEED f0 tHE tlllHlN lNslRuuEtlr, ANo Aq(NovittocEo r0 ME .IHÀT HE IXECTJED IHE SATIE IN HIS AUIHORIZED CÁPASÎY, AIIO ]I{AT BY HIS gEüÌJRE $I lHE INSIRUMENT IHE PERSOI{, OR THE EI{IIIY UPOÌ{ SIIIÀIf OF ìT}IIC|I IHE PERSOI{ ACIED, EXECII1EO.THE INSTRUUENT.

NOTES;
,I, REFER 'fO IE{ÎAÎVE MAP APPUCANON NO. O5-S-002.

2. tHE P.U,E oÐroÂloil l0 ne oil qvEs IHE oTY, oylt{ERs 0F PUBU0 UIIU1IES ANf) OY'T¡ffiS OF CABI"E'IV FÎANCHISES ]HE ftGHT TO AC(f,SS, æII¡STRUCT, MAfiIAIN, INSPECÍ, REPAR, RTPIACE, RÐIOì/E AIIÐ OPTRA'IE I}IBR FÀOUÍIES IN ßE P.U.E.3 NO BUI{¡IN6S OR SIRUC'IURTS $IALI. B€ COiIS'fNUflEO NOR SHAL ANNHNC 8E PTAIITEO WfiIt¡ IHE EASEMÉ{T tvfircH woutD |NÌEFtnE rïtH tHE usE 0R oPaAÌoil 0r PuBucuflrrTtEt rN lHE tAsfr4ilt

3. IHIS S!SD[¡r$o1,t C0]ITA|NS 1.07r ACRTS GRoSS.
4, IH|S $IE tS Not SUEfCT t0 A |oo-llÂR tt000.

5. AtI RIFERINCES ARE TO SAI{ ,JOAqJIN COUNIY RECORDS ANO BOOK OR VOLUME PflECEOES PACf.

E, R€QIJIRTUEN'IS OF IHE TODI MUNIOPAL COÛE FOR 'ÌHE OEDICÀTOI'¡ OF NßHIS-OF-WAY, E¡SET¡T},IIS, ABANOOI,IUENI OF' UNOERGRO,,I{O TAN(S Ai¡D llNTS, PAYMEITT OF TEES AND INSTAIIATS'¡ OF OFF-SIIE S¡RIEI IMPRO\/EIIEN'IS AiIO UÎUÏES HAVE NOT BEII{ uÊT AT lllrs Ìl¡t AflD MUSï BE Utf PRIoR f0 0EVtL0PMENT 0R tSSlrÀilCE tr À BI'II.DINO PERMIT OR IIIIIIX REqJESIEO BY IHE qTY,

9. A 5-FOOT PRIVAIE EISITIENÍ OI/ER LOT 3 FOR SANIIARY SEWN $RV¡CE PI',RPOSES BENERTINO LOT 4 TO BE OEIiCAIED BY SEPÁRATE Ii'ISIRUMEI¡Ì COI.ICURRBIT IïIH PARCEL CONIÆYANCt.

RECORDERS STATEMENN
ffi

1. .M. rN soo({¿ or uips Á[ó pL¡rs, rr p,rffifâ-, Ñ
fiE REotEST 0F CEdL Dtu-or{.

Fw t lO.Ø
tílr'¡tss l¡Y HÁNo;

4. t9. A*i¿/ Ê. D. GÔFF
cfitìbdd I 140ôâ'2
)tory Publc - Cclld di^ OAe,ao

NOTARY PUSUC IN AND FOR IHE
ABOì/E-U{NNONEO SIA1E ANO CO{JI¡IY
-ui
couurssor¡ exeRes.lnAÊ¿H 28, ao¿7

0.D. srEEf N0. 154
ASSESSOR.RECOf, I)In-CO{JNTY GTRK
LIO-) ?oossooz-l
P.M.22-110
R.S. 7-256
NENDA
t
SO4l-Ei [\l f"=J0'
-
lr-
I

SUBDIVISIONS OF SAN JOAQUIN COI'NTY

IITKESHORE PROPERTIES

BEING A PORTON OF THE SOI'THWEST QUARIER OF
sEcroN 11, T.sN.. R,6E.,
M.D.B.&l¡1..
clTY 0F LODI, SAN .JoAAUIN COUNW, CAUFORNIA
DII,TI}N & Ifi'APEÏ
CONSU!??ÍI'C C't4t ENG'NE'ERS
EwGINEERING . PLi4NN,NG I SURVEyING
APRTL, 2005
SHEET 2 OF 2
FOUNo õ/4" t.R. CAPPEo
AND STAMPED R,C.E, 25855
(R1) UNLESS O'THERMSE NolED.

PARCEL MAP
FOUND

IRON ROD

RECORD OF SIJRIEY

MAPS AND PLATS

BASIS OF BEARINGS

SEARCHEO, FOUND NO'IHING

PUBLIC UTIUW EASEMENT
P.M. 23-89
. P.M. 22-110
M.&P.5ô-60

RIGHT-OF-WAY

SAUARE F'EET

MEASUREO
LOT DIMENSIONS SHOW{ ALONG LOT UNES THAT CONTAIN
WINESS CORNER ARE FROM LOT CORNER TO LOT CORNER.

DRIVE
TISNDÀ PÌJCÉ, UNT NO. I
M.&P, 3õ-60
N 89'145ô" W 119.70'(MXR1)
rxmU)l-()
:Drfi
BASIS OF BEAR/NGS:
.IHE IIIESTERLY PROPERW UNE OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF THAÍ CERTAIN MAP FII.-ED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 23 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE E9' SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDg BEARS N OO'04, 55' E.

MONUMENTS SET:
y4\ 3d rRO¡r ROD Wli{ CAP STAMPED R.C.E. 25835
AND SHOW\¡ IHUS ------+- , UNLESS OIHERWSE NOTEo.

LEGEND:
---o--
P.M,
FD.
t.R.

R.S.

M,&P.
'8.O.8."
s.F.N.

P,U,E.
(Rt)
(R2)
(R5)
R/w
s.F.
(M)
FÞ. 3/4' l,R.

No rÁc (Rt)
P.M,22"110 P,ARCEL
,I
P.M, 2g-89
LOTS 3 AND 5

REAR CORNER DETA'L

NOT TO SCALE
MAP APPUCÀTION NO.
g
E
É
I
N
I
I
N
I
N Bs'1C56" w 164.4,f (MXRÎ)
PÂRCEL 1
P.M. 23-89
U
o6sôoz
LOISSß.W.COR.),6AND
7 (S.E.COR.I-REAR CORNER DETAIL
NOT 10 SCALE
LOTS I(N.W.COR.). 2 AND
J (S.W.COR.ìREAR CoRNER pErA'L

NOT TO SCALE
oo5soo22
olt 6/tuASe/fMtrAP
Ð\
ri\€
t +st# B\, \t - rÊo-
;\
\
/-N 89'1456" W A8.St'
¿iø6Y\s' PRT'ATE EASEMENT \
(sEE No'lE S, SHEET 1) Aì. !
H .ott Þ\" 6465 S.F. \
N 89Ic56" W 142.ô3' \
EX. io'-1
P.u.E. (Rr) \
ê\t,
LOT 2 \Ð\
7444 s.F. v \
LW¡TNESS CORNER
b sEE DETATL (We.)
oci,o¡
tü-\
Lor t e)\8007 s.F.

WTNESS
CORNER
NBs'r4'5fw

66.æ
Noì
\,,, I
â3.eo

65.00',
$@$
\," ìó5æ
@.ao
rØli -\'t\1t3t2 \
ôaæ
2'4ë',8.
/1/. 3øè/â'l /'
i 82./9'.â.€4.æ

THIS MAP

ASSESSMENT
MANOR,
iS FOR

USE ONLY
UNIT NO.
060-22
5I
rt
\
!)
POR. ENGL/SH OAKS
'- WINCHESIER WOODS
\ù
s
@ U
\ø
rY OF LODI
Tqa
HIGHEST A.P.N. USED
YEAR PAR. # PAR. # PAR. #
84-85 t7
06-07 29 37
tkrl\
V)
s
$ì

ICITY OF LODI
Assessor's Mop Bk.O6O Pg.22
County of Son Jooquín, Colíf.

NOfE; Assessor's Porcel Numbers Shown in Círcles.Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in Ellipsáá.

R. M. Bk. 2J Pg. 02J
A - P. M. Bk. 23 Pg. 12J
B - R. M. Bk. 40 Pg. o67
'#1,\--
e;
ssaÈ
g. /.4'€.

M áP'5'5' *
.4*lz
LEGEND:

S.TN. SEÀRCHTO. FOUND IIOTHM
EL txlsTlli0

FD, TOUND
stc. StcTl0ll

9.0.8. BASIS 0t ffiARINGS
u&P llÁPs ÂN0 PLÀß
P.U. PÀRCtL ltlPs
( ) REcoRo DAÌÀ
o SÛ 3/4'X l0 noil R00 CIPPEo ND SINP€D
t.s. 7889, UNLtls olHtRÏllsE NoltD.

J ID.3I4'NOI NOD CÀPPED A}¡D sÍAJ¡PED LS' 7889- pm É1. 2]-123, ulluss olutRrfllsE tl0ltD. . FD. J¡' ROII ROO TÀGGËD RCE 196J8. PER O.
uNLrSs oIHtRlrFt NoTto.

BASIS O!'BEÀRINGS:
rHE SoUIH UNt oF IHE so{JTHÊASI 1/4 0r $c. 14' L 3N.' R.-68., srsri s ss'i5'Jo' e Æ pm '¡HsJsi¡ 0Ä(s MlloR uNrI N0. 5' I'l&P 2J-23.

TRACT NUIIBER 3581
suBDl',lslolls 0f' sAl{ JoAquN c0uNTY
ÏÍINCHESTER I{OODS
A RffiUBDrl,lsnil 0F PARCET I 0F PARCET ll4! 4:!23'
nsrilc n PoRlfloll 0F THE SoWtlEASf quARf[R 0F
sEcIloN 11, T,3ll., RsE,, r.D.B.& ll., cffY 0F l¡Dl'
SAN JOAQU¡II COUMY, CAUFORNIA
S0FIEI|BER, 2005 SCAIE: l" = 40'
Sheet 2 ol 2
r EIAUMBACH 8¿ PIAZZA' INC'
r A
8!Ë'*'')å?Ë'ï:,,.,
R 6 E, M. D B & M. g
'
'u'' "
s'c' 24 oREFERENCES
O M¡P 23-2i
ø ueP 2i-12
ô uap ls-rl
@ r¡&P 22-8t
O P.r¡.2i-r2l
''WINCHESTTR ACRTS''
$&P 25-12
---Ð( lo'-P'ur'õ
:2.
. SCAlir l'= 10'
NÛfËI:
t. tlts suBDillsl0l{ col'llÂlNs 0.43f
^CnES
A}lD I t0ß.
2, RITTR IO 'ITNTÁITVE il¡P APPIICATIOI{ NO. O5-S-OOI
i. À sorts gnv or tns crE trÂs PflgpÀnED û ll[r 0. lxofRsol ÀrlD ÀsslrcrÄTEs. fnt N0. tc05-200 DAlto l¡ÀY 25, 2005'
¡. uîävrnô p.u.g. olts tH¡ cttf 0F 1001, oTlNtRS 0r PUBUc unun$, ND onrins or ci&f 'tv rRtl¡$tlsEs IHf frcHI r0 ¡ccEss, collslnucl, u¡nfur, rnsirct, RtP^rR, REHÆC. REuolt, ¡¡lD oPERAE IHÉIR FAcluIlEs lN TrE P.U.E.'S. ¡to BUtoNcs 0R sTRtcluRts sltÀtl B€ coNslRUcIIo NoR srirr ¡r¡r¡¡urc Br PUNTED ttrTHtN r¡t E¡stutM 'fHlc¡ tvüm NItRftnE nnn nc usr 0r oftRÀlloN oF Pu8Llc uïlj¡lEs lN IHE EÀSEUENT. s. rHrs $IE lS Nol SUBIECI l0 A 100 rÊÁR nmD,
o, u n¡rmucEs ¡n¡ m s$¡ JoÄsj[l coul{lY RECoRDS ND B00X 0R voruu[ PrEcEo€s P¡eE.

7. AlI DSINCIS ÁRt lltÂsuREo lxll-tss olHtRllllst NoTID. ¡. RrournEw$Is or nt t00t t¡uNlctp¡L cooÉ for lHt oEDlCATloll 0F - 'nnit:cÈ-wx,
EÀstuENls, AÊANDoNUENI 0F ullDtRcRoullD lÄxxs ND'mrç pm¡¡m 0f ftts ANo Ftsl¡u¡ltot¡ 0F oFt-sllt sTRttf rirpRoit[t¡ra ¡t¡0 uTrtflrts Mvt ¡l0T BttN MEr Al lHlS luE ND ullsl 8t lin ifron n DtvnoPtfttl oR tssuruc€ or Á gm¡nc P¡RMII 0R llllEN REOUESIEO 8Y IH€ CIIY.
g. pilùÀÈ ûR¡rsot tistutr¡t to 8t cRtAtEo BY SIPARAIE DocurlENT AT TII¡E 0f iRÁr,tslER 0F Â LoT 0R t0ß.
ro. irniu¡ñr rô seom 6ô1J6 0F ¡HE ouFoRNtÀ suBDÍvlsloN ltÀP Àcr' IHE sGMnn$ oF rHf F0rL0TlltlG P¡8ntS HAVE BtBl Otlfilt0:
,{)N¡I.IÍ: PÀCIIIC ITUPHONE ND IETEGR¡PH COUP¡M.

Î/PÊ UNOÍ,fiGROUND MMilUNfÀIION F¡Ëü.IIES
D0cur¡ENl l{0. 7s01991J (N0T roc,AlÀBtt).

B)N¡I¡É I(M VID€OCIBIE
lrPt; C¡Blt StRvìCt
Docur¡0ü llo. 2002-237321 {NoT l-ocÀT Blt).

SEC,,.*rNE-- - -=.f¡-ffi'ffi#å#i
''WINCHTSTER OAKS,,
l¡&P 25-71
5 ITINCHESTER DRIVE
(551.31'o) 551.61'
(7i6.ir'O) ?¡6.61's0ulH
50urH (6?5.66'0) 675.e6' B'
N0RIìI 2{0.70'
SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET //[1 ttas rN r/orlutrtt{r Box
stc Á(f | \ iuc zs o
¡åit,it'z l, ,
6 c*-"i
I =i ll I
rl sl r ItD. y4' Roil RoD, Ll tloNUMtNI SOX, rA6Cm lgo38, p¡n o' ut{ttss olHtRlllff MnD.
t\
Þ
C)
o
o
----<-la$-
,
-3l4'
lRol{ R00 lfitH BRASS T¡6 ATTÀCHE0
| / ríri sreurÉo î.c.e. arae lr uonulurt oox @
_a:--,:--"-- J
A
/r,I
t
l\
',2lÞ
{0'
Êtz
J
Ñ IE¡
B z'eË$i
=rË -
-
¿o
2 '-
ie
rS
ld
A
l ¡/l1
w
"TNGLISH
PA¡VIT¿ DRAII¡ÅGE ETSETffi.

SM Nü8 9
-l\:r I
s¡ É
IQE
tÉ5ql 4¿
3r á1
fr\
El
3l
I
I
I,
/,I.-
/2_lt8
Él-
,
I
PARCEL 2

12.08 AC.+
P.U. 2J - tzl
OAKS MANOR UNIT NO.s''
l¡&P 2J-23
LOT 293
g
\
t
4 dl
åt
;t-l
f¡l
a
zoA
F¡l
'lÊo
t
Nofr0{ J0 ü (832.5y o) s52.s{
LOT 292
\l/--1
328
"ENGLISH OAKS MANOR
UNIT NO.s'
u&P 2J-23

HAM IANE
iloìlul¡Elfls sm
sEr J/1' X 30' lRoll RoD cùtPED ND STÅr¡Æ0 LS 7889' SH0ÛN lHUs: + or xir rne ¡r J-F001 ofFsET t0 R€ÂR tol coRNtRs. clllstuto cRossEs "+' rTilr BE SEI l¡¡ COIICRETE SDflATK AT 3-r00T 0ffsEf T0 fR0Nl toT C0RNERS 0N tXfÊNSll)N 0f Lof uN€. HAM LÀNE
(0.0. sHtfl r5-A) RETER f0 ltf¡IÄÌlvt l{4P N0..05-s-001. '0- L'l n
/o-67 n oossoor-z

FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 ASSESSMENT ROLL

The assessment roll for each zone is shown on the following pages. The description of each lot or parcel as part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Joaquin are, by reference, made part of this Report.

Assessor’s parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be based on the County Assessor’s secured roll data for the applicable year in which this Report is prepared and is incorporated herein by reference.

A listing of assessor’s parcels assessed within the District for Fiscal Year 2022/23, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount.

City of Lodi
2022/23 Engineer’s Report – Landscape Maintenance District No. 2003-1 2 7 City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Almondwood Est.

Zone 1 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-610-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 $18.36 $55.08 $55.08
062-610-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.163 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.131 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.129 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.143 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.121 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 3 04/19/2022 10:15:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Almondwood Est.

Zone 1 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-610-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.212 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.193 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.213 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.147 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.131 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.127 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-610-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.123 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.145 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.179 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.206 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 3 04/19/2022 10:15:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Almondwood Est.

Zone 1 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-620-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.204 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.230 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.212 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.191 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.212 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.212 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.192 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.213 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-620-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
222 74.00 222.000 $4,075.9274 Accounts
222 74.00 222.000 $4,075.9274 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 3 04/19/2022 10:15:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Century Meadow 1
Zone 2 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-520-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.186 3 1.00 3.000 $18.36 $55.08 $55.08
058-520-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.196 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.188 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.201 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.187 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.168 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.192 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.168 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.155 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.174 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.191 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.162 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.155 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.164 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.174 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.163 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.156 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.170 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.172 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.174 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.183 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.171 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.166 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 5 04/19/2022 11:23:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Century Meadow 1
Zone 2 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-520-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.159 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.155 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.241 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.250 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.154 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.258 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.232 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-410-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-420-000
Single Family
Residential 0.144 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-430-000
Single Family
Residential 0.165 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.149 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.159 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.161 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-480-000
Single Family
Residential 0.174 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-490-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-500-000
Single Family
Residential 0.172 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-510-000
Single Family
Residential 0.182 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-520-000
Single Family
Residential 0.144 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-530-000
Single Family
Residential 0.167 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-540-000
Single Family
Residential 0.173 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-550-000
Single Family
Residential 0.185 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-560-000
Single Family
Residential 0.168 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 5 04/19/2022 11:23:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Century Meadow 1
Zone 2 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-520-570-000
Single Family
Residential 0.163 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-590-000
Single Family
Residential 0.337 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-600-000
Single Family
Residential 0.210 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-610-000
Single Family
Residential 0.171 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-620-000
Single Family
Residential 0.173 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-630-000
Single Family
Residential 0.173 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-640-000
Single Family
Residential 0.186 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-520-650-000
Single Family
Residential 0.186 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.164 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.183 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.190 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.172 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.178 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.172 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.149 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.164 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.175 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.158 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.149 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.149 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.149 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 5 04/19/2022 11:23:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Century Meadow 1
Zone 2 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-580-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.151 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.151 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.182 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.320 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.200 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.190 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.192 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.190 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.206 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.206 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.220 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.220 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-410-000
Single Family
Residential 0.206 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-420-000
Single Family
Residential 0.210 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-430-000
Single Family
Residential 0.220 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.213 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.230 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.333 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.207 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-480-000
Single Family
Residential 0.218 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 5 04/19/2022 11:23:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Century Meadow 1
Zone 2 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-580-490-000
Single Family
Residential 0.218 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-500-000
Single Family
Residential 0.191 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-510-000
Single Family
Residential 0.190 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-520-000
Single Family
Residential 0.220 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-530-000
Single Family
Residential 0.178 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-540-000
Single Family
Residential 0.174 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-550-000
Single Family
Residential 0.171 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-560-000
Single Family
Residential 0.164 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-570-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-580-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-590-000
Single Family
Residential 0.175 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-600-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-610-000
Single Family
Residential 0.170 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-620-000
Single Family
Residential 0.169 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-630-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-640-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-650-000
Single Family
Residential 0.177 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-660-000
Single Family
Residential 0.179 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-670-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-680-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-580-690-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
399 133.00 399.000 $7,325.64133 Accounts
399 133.00 399.000 $7,325.64133 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 5 04/19/2022 11:23:19AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Millsbridge II
Zone 3 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
031-040-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.204 1 1.00 1.000 $18.36 $18.36 $18.36
031-040-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.204 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.193 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-480-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-040-490-000
Single Family
Residential 0.131 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.178 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.143 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.153 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 2 04/19/2022 11:25:22AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Millsbridge II
Zone 3 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
031-290-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.126 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.142 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.143 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.143 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.146 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.159 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.167 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
031-290-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
39 39.00 39.000 $716.0439 Accounts
39 39.00 39.000 $716.0439 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 2 04/19/2022 11:25:22AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Almond North
Zone 4 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-630-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 1 1.00 1.000 $18.36 $18.36 $18.36
062-630-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-110-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.179 1 2.00 2.000 18.36 18.36 36.72
062-630-120-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.165 1 2.00 2.000 18.36 18.36 36.72
062-630-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-140-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.170 1 2.00 2.000 18.36 18.36 36.72
062-630-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-250-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.166 1 2.00 2.000 18.36 18.36 36.72
062-630-260-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.180 1 2.00 2.000 18.36 18.36 36.72
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 2 04/19/2022 11:29:49AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Almond North
Zone 4 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-630-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
062-630-280-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.177 1 2.00 2.000 18.36 18.36 36.72
28 34.00 34.000 $624.2428 Accounts
28 34.00 34.000 $624.2428 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 2 04/19/2022 11:29:49AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-540-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.276 3 1.00 3.000 $18.36 $55.08 $55.08
058-540-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.141 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.151 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.153 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.148 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.148 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.220 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.299 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.131 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.159 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.157 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:43AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-540-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.152 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-410-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-420-000
Single Family
Residential 0.153 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-430-000
Single Family
Residential 0.163 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-480-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-490-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-500-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-510-000
Single Family
Residential 0.159 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-520-000
Single Family
Residential 0.198 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-530-000
Single Family
Residential 0.323 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-540-000
Single Family
Residential 0.163 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-550-000
Single Family
Residential 0.132 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-560-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:43AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-540-570-000
Single Family
Residential 0.156 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-580-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-590-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-600-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-610-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-620-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-630-000
Single Family
Residential 0.139 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-640-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-650-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-660-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-670-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-680-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-690-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-700-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-710-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-720-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-730-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-740-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-750-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-760-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-540-770-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.189 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.185 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.185 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.181 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.149 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:43AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-560-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.264 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.181 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.123 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.128 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.159 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.141 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.146 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.131 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:44AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-560-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.132 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.135 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-410-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-420-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-430-000
Single Family
Residential 0.138 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.137 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.157 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-480-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-490-000
Single Family
Residential 0.131 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-500-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-510-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-520-000
Single Family
Residential 0.124 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-530-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-540-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-550-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-560-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-570-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-580-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-590-000
Single Family
Residential 0.115 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-600-000
Single Family
Residential 0.173 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-610-000
Single Family
Residential 0.174 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-620-000
Single Family
Residential 0.177 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-630-000
Single Family
Residential 0.158 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:44AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-560-640-000
Single Family
Residential 0.132 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-650-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-660-000
Single Family
Residential 0.153 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-670-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-680-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-690-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-700-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-710-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-720-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-730-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-740-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-560-750-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.161 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.144 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.126 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.123 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.187 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.200 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 6 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:44AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-570-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.126 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.136 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.121 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.127 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.146 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.117 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-410-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-420-000
Single Family
Residential 0.119 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-430-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 7 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:44AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consol LMD No2003-1Legacy I Legacy II & Kirst
Zone 5 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-570-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-480-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-490-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-500-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-510-000
Single Family
Residential 0.114 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-520-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-530-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-540-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-550-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-560-000
Single Family
Residential 0.123 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-570-000
Single Family
Residential 0.126 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-580-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-590-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-600-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-610-000
Single Family
Residential 0.116 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-620-000
Single Family
Residential 0.126 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-630-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-640-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-650-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-600-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.190 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-600-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.180 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-600-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.181 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-600-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.143 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-600-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.134 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-600-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.145 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
669 223.00 669.000 $12,282.84223 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 8 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:44AM 669 223.00 669.000 $12,282.84223 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 9 of 9 04/19/2022 11:31:44AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 The Villas
Zone 6 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-640-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.107 3 1.00 3.000 $18.36 $55.08 $55.08
062-640-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.113 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.096 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.075 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.077 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.089 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.087 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.073 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.090 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.091 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.067 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.073 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.097 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.078 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.084 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.063 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.060 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 3 04/19/2022 11:37:01AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 The Villas
Zone 6 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-640-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.065 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.068 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.077 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-640-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.067 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.063 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.071 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.061 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.061 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-180-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-190-000
Single Family
Residential 0.076 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-200-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-210-000
Single Family
Residential 0.066 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-220-000
Single Family
Residential 0.066 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-230-000
Single Family
Residential 0.066 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 3 04/19/2022 11:37:01AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 The Villas
Zone 6 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
062-650-240-000
Single Family
Residential 0.074 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-250-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-260-000
Single Family
Residential 0.064 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-270-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-280-000
Single Family
Residential 0.078 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-290-000
Single Family
Residential 0.071 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-300-000
Single Family
Residential 0.073 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-310-000
Single Family
Residential 0.072 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-320-000
Single Family
Residential 0.071 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-330-000
Single Family
Residential 0.076 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-340-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-350-000
Single Family
Residential 0.071 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-360-000
Single Family
Residential 0.073 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-370-000
Single Family
Residential 0.075 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-380-000
Single Family
Residential 0.069 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-390-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-400-000
Single Family
Residential 0.070 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-410-000
Single Family
Residential 0.118 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-420-000
Single Family
Residential 0.067 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-430-000
Single Family
Residential 0.060 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-440-000
Single Family
Residential 0.068 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-450-000
Single Family
Residential 0.068 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-460-000
Single Family
Residential 0.148 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
062-650-470-000
Single Family
Residential 0.110 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
240 80.00 240.000 $4,406.4080 Accounts
240 80.00 240.000 $4,406.4080 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 3 04/19/2022 11:37:01AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Vintage Oaks
Zone 8 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-640-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.171 3 1.00 3.000 $18.36 $55.08 $55.08
058-640-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.187 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.205 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.212 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.210 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.202 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.186 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.211 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.234 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.240 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.241 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.258 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.282 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.190 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.183 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.163 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-640-170-000
Single Family
Residential 0.164 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
51 17.00 51.000 $936.3617 Accounts
51 17.00 51.000 $936.3617 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:38:52AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003 Interlake Square
Zone 9 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
045-340-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.142 1 1.00 1.000 $18.36 $18.36 $18.36
045-340-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.129 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.127 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.125 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.123 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.122 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.120 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.104 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
045-340-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.093 1 1.00 1.000 18.36 18.36 18.36
11 11.00 11.000 $201.9611 Accounts
11 11.00 11.000 $201.9611 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:41:45AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Tate Property
Zone 11 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
058-570-670-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 $18.36 $55.08 $55.08
058-570-680-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-690-000
Multi-Family
Residential
(Duplex) 0.304 3 2.00 6.000 18.36 55.08 110.16
058-570-700-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-710-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-720-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
058-570-730-000
Single Family
Residential 0.160 3 1.00 3.000 18.36 55.08 55.08
21 8.00 24.000 $440.647 Accounts
21 8.00 24.000 $440.647 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:43:24AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Guild Avenue Ind
Zone 13 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
049-340-120-000 Industrial 4.690 1 18.76 18.760 $18.36 $18.36 $344.42 049-340-150-000 Industrial 0.610 1 2.44 2.440 18.36 18.36 44.80 049-340-160-000 Industrial 0.569 1 2.28 2.276 18.36 18.36 41.78 049-340-190-000 Industrial 0.569 1 2.28 2.276 18.36 18.36 41.78 049-340-200-000 Industrial 1.920 1 7.68 7.676 18.36 18.36 140.92 049-340-360-000 Industrial 13.890 1 55.56 55.560 18.36 18.36 1,020.08 049-340-400-000 Industrial 0.640 1 2.56 2.558 18.36 18.36 46.96 049-340-410-000 Industrial 0.390 1 1.56 1.558 18.36 18.36 28.60 8 93.10 93.104 $1,709.348 Accounts
8 93.10 93.104 $1,709.348 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:44:58AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Luca Place
Zone 14 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
027-450-010-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 2 1.00 2.000 $18.36 $36.72 $36.72
027-450-020-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-030-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-040-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-050-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-060-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-070-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-080-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-090-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-100-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-110-000
Single Family
Residential 0.130 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-120-000
Single Family
Residential 0.150 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-130-000
Single Family
Residential 0.143 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-140-000
Single Family
Residential 0.133 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-150-000
Single Family
Residential 0.140 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
027-450-160-000
Single Family
Residential 0.127 2 1.00 2.000 18.36 36.72 36.72
32 16.00 32.000 $587.5216 Accounts
32 16.00 32.000 $587.5216 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:49:10AM City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 Guild Avenue Ind2
Zone 15 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
4 Accounts
4 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:47:13AM 049-330-100-000 Industrial 0.555 1 2.22 2.220 $18.36 $18.36 $40.7 4 049-330-110-000 Industrial 2.500 1 10.00 10.000 18.36 18.36 183.60 049-330-230-000 Industrial 5.180 1 20.72 20.720 18.36 18.36 380.4 0 049-340-380-000 Industrial 0.832 1 3.33 3.328 18.36 18.36 61.10 4 36.27 36.268 $665.8 4
4 36.27 36.268 $665.8 4
City of Lodi
Lodi Consolidated LMD No. 2003-1 West Kettleman Pl
Zone 16 - Assessment Roll for Fiscal Year 2022/23
APN
Property
Type Lot Size
Benefit
Points
Benefit
Factor (DUE)
Benefit
Units
Rate per
Benefit Unit
Rate Per
DUE
Levy
Amount
031-330-100-000
Commercial
or Office 0.580 1 2.90 2.900 $18.36 $18.36 $53.24
058-160-860-000
Commercial
or Office 1.092 1 5.46 5.460 18.36 18.36 100.24
2 8.36 8.360 $153.482 Accounts
2 8.36 8.360 $153.482 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 04/19/2022 11:51:07AM RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND

ASSESSMENT OF THE LODI CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
========================================================================

WHEREAS, the Council previously completed its proceedings in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (“Ac t”) to establish the Lodi Consolidated Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2003-1 (“Assessment District”); and

WHEREAS, the City has retained N BS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of assessments within the Assessment District , a nd to prepare and file an Annual Report, in accordance with §22567 of the Act; and

WHEREAS, the Council has, by previous resolution, declared its intention to hold a Public Hearing on the levy of the proposed assessment and notice of such hearing has been duly given, in accordance with §22626 of the Act; and

WHEREAS, the Council has held and concluded a Public Hearing on the levy of the proposed assessment and has considered all objections.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE COUNCIL, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Purpose of Assessment: The assessment is to be levied and collected to pay the costs of operating, maintaining, and servicing the improvements described in the Annual Report, which is on file with the City Clerk.

2. Compliance with the Law: The assessment is in compliance with all provisions of the Act, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act.

3. Basis of Assessment: The assessment is based upon the estimated benefit f rom the improvements described in the Annual Report, which is on file with the City Clerk, and such assessment is calculated without regard to property valuation.

4. Confirmation of Diagram and Assessment : The Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment, as detailed in the Annual Report on file with the City Clerk.

5. Levy of Assessment: Pursuant to §22631 of the Act, the adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 202 2, and ending June 30, 2023.

6. Filing of Assessment: The Council hereby orders NBS to file the assessment , as confirmed, with the San Joaquin County Auditor-Controller.

Dated: July 20, 2022
=========================================================================

I hereby c ertify that Resolution No. 2022 -_____ was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held July 20, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk
2022-____

AGENDA ITEM H-01

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPR
OVED: ________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
AGENDA TITLE: Provide Direction to Staff on Whether to Be gin a Proactive Community Improvement Model
M
EETING DATE: July 20, 2022
P
REPARED BY: City Manager
RE
COMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff on whether to begin a proactive community improvement model.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This item is on at the request of Council member Khan. As a reminder to Council, the Council Adopted Protocol Manual allows any council member to put an item on the agenda:

6. 3b Placing Items on the Agenda Pursuant to LMC Section 2.04.180 “Preparation of agendas,” matters may be placed on the agenda for consideration by request of 1) any member of the City Council, 2) the City Manager, 3) the City Clerk, and 4) the City Attorney. Any reasonable request by any person named in this section shall be honored, subject to the City Manager's discretion as to the preparation of accompanying staff reports.

A
t the same time the Protocol Manual prohibits staff from performing extensive staff work on a staff report without the direction of the support of the majority of the Council.

7. 5 Communications with Staff Pursuant to LMC Section 2.12.070, “Council to Deal Exclusively through City Manager,” the City Council and its members, except for the purpose of inquiry, shall deal with administrative services solely through the City Manager, and neither the City Council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any of the subordinates of the City Manager. A Council Member shall not direct staff to initiate any action, change a course of action, or prepare any report that is significant in nature, nor shall a Council Member initiate any project or study without the approval of a majority of Council.

T
he above sections strike a balance between ensuring that all council members have a right to air their concerns and ensuring that staff time is not monopolized by a single member’s concerns that do not have majority support of the council. Accordingly, this staff report does not go into significant detail on how a plan might best be formulated and requests Council direction on whether to attempt to engage in this public outreach process to create a plan to present to council.

Provide Direction to Staff on Whether to Begin a Proactive Code Enforcement Model July 20, 2022

Today, Community Improvement operates on a complaint driven basis and does not actively patrol looking for code violations. Officers respond to complaints from residents or contractors. Staff does have a number of concerns with the proactive Community Improvement model. The primary concern is the amount of staff that would be required to staff a proactive enforcement model. If Lodi follows the proactive model, the public will have an even greater expectation that we address every violation.

Since the transfer of Community Improvement from the Police Department, now over a year ago, is just now reaching Council’s direction to have a staff of three Community Improvement Officers. Recruiting qualified applicants has been difficult. The current complaint based model generates 10 to 15 calls per day, per officer.

Creating a successful, proactive Community Improvement model will require a minimum of two additional Community Improvement Officers, and one additional administrative staff, with all necessary equipment and vehicle costs. The true logistical difficulty is the City’s ability to find/hire the number of qualified staff, to carry out a proactive program in a timely fashion.

Staff also acknowledges that a proactive Community Improvement program would be less effective at current staffing levels and as such, we are happy to take Council direction on whether to begin the process of bring forward a proposal for council consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.

FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.

________________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer
City Manager
H-02

AGENDA ITEM H-03

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPR
OVED: ________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
AGENDA TITLE: Provide Direction to Staff on Whether to Bring Forward an Item to Address Council Salary
M
EETING DATE: Ju ly 20, 2022
P
REPARED BY: City Manager
RE
COMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff on whether to bring forward an item to address Council salary.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Councilmember Khan requested staff agendize a discussion on Council salary. Government Code 36516 governs council salary. The code lays out a baseline salary for cities based on population with larger cities having larger allowed starting salaries. Lodi started at $500 a month as a city with a population of 50,000 to 75,000 and still falls under that same $500 monthly baseline. The Government Code allows an increase of “five percent for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in effect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted.” In effect, the language means that the salary may not be compounded in the years in which no adjustments were made, but may be compounded for years in which an adjustment was made.

His
torically, Council salaries were $500 per month; however, the Lodi City Council did adjust Council salaries in 2008 to $860 per month. Council salaries have remained at $860 per month. As a result, the salary is legally eligible for a 70 percent adjustment from the 2008 salary: 70 percent x $860 = $602 for a total possible increased monetary salary of $1,462.

T
he Government Code also requires that at least one of the council members that votes for the increase stand for election before the increase may become effective. That would require Council to act before November of 2022 in order for the increase to become effective in December of 2022.

A
s a point of reference, council has approved compounded salary increases for city employees on the low and high side set forth below since 2008:

Bargaining Units Total COLA Total Cost-Sharing Net Increase IBEW 36% 2% 34%
AFSCME-General Services 24% 5% 19%
AFSCME-Maintenance & Operators 25% 6% 19%
T
he percentages listed are net of any PERS swaps which council has not participated in.

Provide Direction to Staff on Whether to Bring Forward an Item to Address Council Salary July 20, 2022

C
ouncil also participates in the various benefits set forth in Resolution 2021-12 attached as Exhibit A which include Accidental Death and Dismemberment insurance of $10,000, Chiropractic Coverage, Deferred Compensation match of 3%, Dental Coverage, $10,000 Life Insurance, Medical Insurance or a buyout option, PERS Retirement, Technology Allowance, Travel Insurance, Vision Coverage and Workers Compensation.

FI
SCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.

F
UNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.
________________________________________

S tephen Schwabauer
City Manager
Attachment: Resolution No. 2021-12

AGENDA ITEM H-04

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPROVED: ________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lodi and the Lodi Police Dispatchers Association for the Period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025
MEETING DATE: July 20, 2022
PREPARED BY: Human Resources Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lodi and the Lodi Police Dispatchers Association for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Representatives from t he City of Lodi and the Lodi Police Dispatchers Association of Lodi ( LPDA) have been bargaining over a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the past four months and have reached a tentative agreement, subject to Council approval.

A redline strikeout version of the MOU is attached for Council review and approval. A summary of the key changes to the MOU are as follows:
 The term of the MOU shall be from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025.  Fourteen percent (14%) wage adjustment over the term of the contract as follows:
o Six percent (6%) effective July 11, 2022;
o Four percent (4%) effective July 10, 2023; and
o Four percent (4%) effective July 8, 2024.
 Increase to the City’s contribution towards medical premiums and remain over the term of the contract:
o $ 2,005.81 per month for family coverage;
o $ 1,542.71 per month for employee plus one dependent coverage; and o $ 771.35 per month for employee only coverage.
 Increase to the annual maximum Dental benefits from $1,000 to $1,250, elimination of the e mployee contribution for dependent coverage (the City pays 100% of the premium), and the addition of orthodontia benefits for the employees and eligible dependents with a lifetime maximum benefit of $1,250.  Increase in Holiday Leave accrual in recognition of Juneteenth holiday.

The City of Lodi Police Department operates a Type 1 detention facility that houses inmates prior to court appearances. The jail is inspected annually by the San Joaquin County Public Health Services and biennially by the Board of State and Community Corrections. The facility must be in compliance with the Minimum Standards for Local Detention Facilities as outlined in Titles 15 and 24 of the California Code of Regulations.

The jail facility consists of ten (10) double-occupancy housing cells (max capacity 20), a male sobering cell (max occupancy 8), a female sobering cell (max occupancy 7), a safety cell (max occupancy 1) and a temporary holding cell (max occupancy 15).

Employees in the classification of Dispatcher/Jailer perform jailer functions in addition to dispatcher duties whereas Dispatchers in other local jurisdictions do not perform jailer functions. Both the City and LPDA recognize the need to offer competitive salary and benefit packages to attract and retain talented employees to fill these unique positions within LPDA.

While the City desires to maintain fiscally sustainable operations, the community and the police department require competent staff to dispatch officers and safety personnel in emergency situatio ns. Additionally, the jail must be managed pursuant to state and county regulations.

Staff recommends that the Council approve the MOU between the City and LPDA.

FISCAL IMPACT: The total long term annual cost of the proposed agreement is $218,000. The total cost of the term of the agreement is $474,000 as shown below.

Fiscal Year 2022/23 $ 98,000
Fiscal Year 2023/24 $ 158,000
Fiscal Year 2024/25 $ 218,000

Total Cost (3 years) $ 474,000

FUNDING AVAILABLE: Budget adju stments for these and other compensation increases for City employees may be needed at Mid Year Fiscal Year 2022/23 . Vacancy savings are the first source for funding the increases for this and future employee contract changes in the coming Fiscal Year. T hese savings have been significant in the past three years allowing the City to build up substantial reserves. These reserves may be necessary to finance a portion of salary increases. Staff will first seek to prioritize Pension Stabilization Reserves he ld at PARS to pay eligible pension costs in order to preserve locally held economic and catastrophic reserves should actual reserves be needed. Staff will seek Council input prior to any use of reserves.

_________________________________
Adele Post, Human Resources Manager

_________________________________
Andrew Keys, Deputy City Manager

Attachment

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING

THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2022 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025
========================================================================

WHEREAS, representatives from the City and Lodi Dispatchers Association (LPDA) have bargained in good faith and reached a tentative agreement on a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU); and

WHEREAS, it is recommended that Council appr ove revisions to the MOU with LPDA to include the following:

• The term of the MOU shall be from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025. • Fourteen percent (14%) wage adjustment over the term of the contract as follows:
o Six percent (6%) effective July 11, 2022;
o Four percent (4%) effective July 10, 2023; and
o Four percent (4%) effective July 8, 2024.
• Increase to the City’s contribution towards medical premiums and remain over the term of the contract:
o $ 2,005.81 per month for family coverage;
o $ 1,542.71 per month for employee plus one dependent coverage; and o $ 771.35 per month for employee only coverage.
• Increase to the annual maximum dental benefit from $1,000 to $1,250, elimination of the employee contribution for dependent coverage (the City pays 100% of the premium), and the addition of orthodontia benefits for the employees and eligible dependents with a lifetime maximum benefit of $1,250.
• Increase the holiday leave bank in recognition of the Juneteenth holiday.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (Exhibit A) between the City of Lodi and LPDA, effective July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025.

Date: July 20, 2022
======================================================================== I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2022- ___ was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held July 20, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk

2022-____
LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 2019 - JUNE 30, 2022

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

CITY OF LODI
AND

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION
July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2022
July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2025
Exhibit A

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

3 Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1 – COMPENSATION & WORKING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................... 44 ARTICLE I - SALARY.................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 ARTICLE II - HOURS AND OVERTIME ...................................................................................................................................................... 44 ARTICLE III – BILINGUAL DISPATCHERS ............................................................................................................................................... 77 ARTICLE IV – INCENTIVE PAY .................................................................................................................................................................. 77 ARTICLE V – UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ..................................................................................................................................................... 88 ARTICLE VI - COURT APPEARANCES ...................................................................................................................................................... 88 ARTICLE VII –LOYALTY PAY .................................................................................................................................................................... 88 ARTICLE VIII - SAFETY ............................................................................................................................................................................... 99 CHAPTER 2 – LEAVES .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1010 ARTICLE IX - CATASTROPHIC LEAVE ................................................................................................................................................. 1010 ARTICLE X - HOLIDAYS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1010 ARTICLE XI - LEAVES OF ABSENCE..................................................................................................................................................... 1010 ARTICLE XII - SICK LEAVE .................................................................................................................................................................... 1111 ARTICLE XIII - VACATION LEAVE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1111 ARTICLE XIV – TIME OFF FOR SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................................... 1111 CHAPTER 3 – INSURANCE BENEFITS AND RETIREMENT .................................................................................................................... 1313 ARTICLE XV - DENTAL AND VISION INSURANCE ........................................................................................................................ 1313 ARTICLE XVI – MEDICAL INSURANCE ................................................................................................................................................ 1313 ARTICLE XVII - LONG TERM DISABILITY .......................................................................................................................................... 1414 ARTICLE XVIII - LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE ................................................................................................................................. 1414 ARTICLE XIX - DEFERRED COMPENSATION ...................................................................................................................................... 1414 ARTICLE XX - PERS.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1414 ARTICLE XXI - SICK LEAVE CONVERSION ..................................................................................................................................... 1515 ARTICLE XXII - TUITION REIMBURSEMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 1717 ARTICLE XXIII - WORKERS' COMPENSATION ................................................................................................................................... 1717 CHAPTER 4 – ASSOCIATION/CITY ISSUES ............................................................................................................................................... 1919 ARTICLE XXIV - CITY RIGHTS........................................................................................................................................................... 1919 ARTICLE XXV - CHANGES IN MEMORANDUM ................................................................................................................................ 2020 ARTICLE XXVI - EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION ........................................................................................................................... 2020 ARTICLE XXVII - EMPLOYEES RIGHTS ........................................................................................................................................... 2121 ARTICLE XXVIII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................. 2323 ARTICLE XXIX - MUTUAL CONSENT CONTINGENCY .................................................................................................................. 2525 ARTICLE XXX - NO STRIKES .............................................................................................................................................................. 2626 ARTICLE XXXI - RESERVED ............................................................................................................................................................... 2626 ARTICLE XXXII - PROBATION ........................................................................................................................................................... 2626 ARTICLE XXXIII - PROMOTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 2626 ARTICLE XXXIV - SENIORITY ............................................................................................................................................................... 2626 ARTICLE XXXV - STATUS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2727 ARTICLE XXXVI - TERM ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2728 EXHIBIT A – SALARY SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.30

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

4 CITY OF LODI
AND

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 22 19 – J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 2 5 2

CHAPTER 1 – COMPENSATION & WORKING CONDITIONS

ARTICLE I - SALARY

1.1 The Salary Schedule for members of the LPDA will be as set forth in Exhibit A.

1.2 Although the City is not required to perform a survey during the term of this MOU, the parties agree that if a survey is performed, the 15 cities to be surveyed shall be: Chico, Clovis, Davis, Fairfield, Merced, Manteca, Modesto, Redding, Roseville, Stockton, Tracy, Turlock, Vacaville, Visalia and Woodland.

In the event a salary survey is conducted during the term of this MOU, the lead dispatcher position will be used as the benchmark for the survey, provided that any city that does not have lead position shall use the dispatcher position and any training incentives received as part of the base. The survey shall be based upon total compensation including salary and limited to employee contribut ion to the Public Employees Retirement System paid on behalf of employee by employer, employer’s health insurance premium, deferred compensation, and any comparable incentives.

Effective July 11, 2022, the first full pay period after City Council approval of the MOU, the City shall provide a cost of livingwage increase of six five percent (6%5%). The City shall provide a cost of livingwage increase of threefour percent (4%3%) effective with the first full pay periods in July 20232020 and July 20242021.

ARTICLE II - HOURS AND OVERTIME

2.1 Work schedules presently in effect shall remain in effect; however, the City reserves the right to change the hours of work after consultation with the employees involved.

Temporary changes in this schedule must have at least 24 hours ’ notice.

2.2 Dispatcher/Jailer positions assigned to the Communication Center shall work a twelve (12) hour schedule with a one (1) hour paid lunch and two (2) 15 - minute breaks. Alternative work schedules for Dispatcher/Jailer positi ons assigned outside of the Communications Center may be developed by mutual agreement between an employee (s) and the appropriate supervisor.

2.3 Members assigned to the Property Unit shall work a 4/10 schedule. The personnel participating will have consecu tive days off scheduled depending on the needs of the assignment.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

5 a) Employees participating in this schedule will officially begin their work week at noon Friday to avoid FLSA conflicts and/or overtime.
b) In the event of unexpected staff shortages, this alternative work schedule can be terminated with 72 hours’ notice.

2.4 Overtime - Overtime work is work performed by an employee outside their regular hours and includes time worked:
a) In excess of forty (40) hours in a work week for members working a 4/10 schedule.

This provision may be nullified if a shift trade is involved. b) In excess of eight (8) hours in any work day for those on an eight (8) hour shift, in excess of ten (10) hours in any work day for those on a ten (10) hour shift, and in excess of twelve (12) hours per day for those on a twelve (12) hour shift. c) Time worked outside of regular hours of work on a work day unless notification has been made in accordance with this MOU.
d) Time worked on a non-work day unless involved in a shift trade.

2.5 Employees who are required to report for prearranged work on their non -work days shall be compensated at the overtime rate for actual hours worked, but in no event shall they be paid for less than three (3) hours.

2.6 Compensation paid to employees called out in emergency situations, outside their regular work hours, shall be a minimum of three (3) hours’ pay at the overtime rate.

2.7 When, at the request of the supervisor in charge, an employee reports for prearranged overtime on work days outside of their regular work hours, the employee shall be paid overtime compensation for actual worked time in connection therewith, provided however, that if any such employee continues to work into their regular work hours, the employee shall be paid overtime compensation only for actual work time up to their regular work hours.

2.8 Rest Period - The intent of the rest period is to ensure that members of this unit are adequately rested for their assigned work shift. In the event a supervisor or Watch Commander deems it necessary for an employee to work through their rest period, the employee will continue being paid at the overtime rate. a) Employees will receive a continuous eight (8) hour rest period immediately preceding or immediately following their scheduled court appearance or other departmental assignment(s), if less than eight (8) hours has elapsed during:
1) the time period that employee’s regular work shift ends and their scheduled appearance/assignment time; or
2) the time period that employee is dismissed and their regular work shift begins.

This rest period will not be charged to the employee.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

6 b) If an employee receives approval to take the remaining portion of their scheduled shift off, the employee’s leave balances will be charged for the entire shift (as if no rest period has occurred).
c) The rest period does not apply when an employee is scheduled for court or appearance/assignment the day immediately following a day off.

2.9 Compensatory Time - Employees may accrue compensatory time (CTO) in lieu of overtime pay. The accrual rate for compensatory time shall be one and one -half (1 ½) hours for each hour of overtime worked.

a) No more than 144 hours of CTO may be carried on the books at any time. Bargaining Unit Members with banks exceeding 144 hours shall retain those excess hours but shall not be eligible to accrue additional CTO hours until their CTO banks fall below the 144 hour maximum provided for in this MOU.

b) An employee’s decision to elect CTO instead of overtime is irrevocable.

c) Employees may cash out their CTO twice a year during the months of April and October.

d) Upon separation, the employee will be paid at the emp loyee’s current hourly rate of pay or the average of the last three years, whichever is higher, for the remaining CTO balance.

e) Employees may submit a written request to the Chief of Police to increase the hours of CTO that may be carried on the books in e xcess of 144 hours. The request may only be made to address extenuating circumstances and will be evaluated on a case by case basis. The decision to grant or deny said requests is at the sole discretion of the Chief of Police.

2.10 Communications Center Staffing - When staffing shortages occur in the Communications Center, Dispatcher/Jailers shall be called back to work under the following guidelines.

Staffing shortages shall be determined by the number of fully -trained personnel actually on duty in conj unction with the amount and type of work actually needed or logically anticipated on any given watch.
a) Personnel shall be called for duty by or at the direction of the Watch Commander, Supervisor, or Lead responsible for the hours of duty to be worked. The three (3) hour minimum call back time, as per this MOU, shall apply.

The option to work overtime shall be given to Dispatcher/Jailers assigned in the Communication Center by seniority , unless the employee is working an adjacent shift. If the employee has worked, or will be working, the adjacent shift the employee can work no more than sixteen (16) continuous hours, except in emergency circumstances.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

7 b) Any Dispatcher working an overtime shift must be able to perform all duties of dispatch and jail procedures, with the exception of a dispatcher on light duty.

The purpose of this is to eliminate personnel in a training status or an unqualified person from working overtime shifts.

c) A current seniority list shall be maintain ed in the Communication Center with an updated work schedule maintained by the Services Division Supervisor and Patrol Watch Commander(s). Dispatch will be responsible for call in/call backs at the Watch Commander’s direction. Failure by dispatch to follow this procedure will not subject the City to unwarranted overtime.

d) Vacations and Holidays – First vacation pick shall not be canceled unless there is a total departmental call -out. Holidays may be canceled in part or fully ; however, during the period of time that the dispatch unit is short-staffed during the term of this MOU (including newly hired employees in training) the department will allow overtime for the shortage. If the shift is not covered by overtime, the holiday will be canceled. If the dispatch division shall reach full staffing levels based on the then current budgeted Full Time Equivalent positions, and remain at full staffing levels for 60 consecutive days, overtime shall no longer be paid to cover a shortage caused by a holiday or vacation that is not a firs t pick vacation. Should it become necessary to cancel a scheduled holiday, the employee will be given at least forty-eight (48) hours’ notice of the cancellation. If such notice is not given, the employee will be paid at a rate of time and one half (1 ½) for the actual hours worked.

An employee who is on a first-pick schedule vacation will not be compelled to come to work on the vacation days or adjacent regular days off unless exigent circumstances exist. Staffing shortages will not be considered exige nt circumstances for the purposes of this subsection only. Exigent circumstances would include, but not be limited to, natural disasters, riots, total department call-outs, etc.

e) Duties - Personnel called back for work shall perform all the regular duties required in a regular work day and shall appear in uniform.

ARTICLE III – BILINGUAL DISPATCHERS

Unit members who have demonstrated a proficiency in the Spanish language shall receive $150.00 per month. The City shall be the sole judge as to whether a member has the necessary proficiency.

ARTICLE IV – INCENTIVE PAY

4.1 A $165 per month ($76.15 per pay period) incentive pay allowance shall be paid to members who are trained in a Post Certified Field Evidence Technician (FET) course and are on the call out roster for Field Evidence Technicians. The Latent Print Examiner classification will receive the same incentive as FET.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

8 4.2 Employees who have either an AA degree o r Intermediate POST certificate will receive $150 per month. Employees who have a BA degree or Advanced POST certificate shall receive $225 per month. These amounts are not cumulative.

ARTICLE V – UNIFORM ALLOWANCE

5.1 The uniform allowance shall be $950 annually paid bi-weekly in conjunction with regular pay checks.

5.2 In the event of pregnancy, maternity uniforms shall be requi red. The maternity uniform shall consist of a LPDA blue uniform shirt, department patches, and name tage. The pants shall be navy blue and approved by the supervisor. Jailers shall wear a navy blue maternity top with a navy blue or black maternity skirt or slacks; Community Services Officers shall wear similar garments of a blue color.

5.3 The City agrees to repair or replace both personal and City owned uniforms, equipment and property, except for jewelry, damaged or destroyed on duty unless gross negligence can be shown on the part of the employee. Repair or replacement costs shall not exceed reasonable cost. Receipts will be required prior to reimbursement.

ARTICLE VI - COURT APPEARANCES

6.1 An employee serving on jury duty is entitled to keep any monies paid them for jury duty.

6.2 If an employee has jury duty he/she shall not be scheduled to work eight (8) hours preceding or following jury duty at no cost to the employee.

6.3 If an employee covered by this agreement is required by subpoena to appear in court or to give a deposition as a result of an action taken within the scope of employment with the City, that employee will receive their full pay while so doing with no loss of time if said employee is on regular duty. If the employee is not on duty the City agrees to compensate that employee at one and one half (1 ½) times their regular pay for the time spent in any appearance as required by this Article. As a prerequisite for payment to off -duty employees, the Police Chief or designee must be notified in writing of the off duty appearance within seventy-two (72) hours after the employee is subpoenaed or otherwise notified of the required court appearance.

ARTICLE VII –LOYALTY PAY

7.1 After completing ten years of service with the LPDA, employees shall receive loyalty pay in the amount of $1,500 in November of the year following completion of ten years of service and each year thereafter until completing twenty (20) years of service with the LPDA. Employees who have completed 20 years of service with the LPDA will receive loyalty pay in the amount of $3,000 in November of the year following completion of twenty (20) full years of service and each year thereafter.

For the purposes of this article, all employees who as of October 31st meet the service level requirements (either ten full years or 20 full years from the first day of the month in which

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

9 they started their employment with the LPDA) shall receive the loyalty pay associated with their years of service with the LPDA.

ARTICLE VIII - SAFETY

8.1 The Cit y reaffirms its desire and aim to provide a safe place of employment for its employees and shall continue to take all reasonable steps to ensure this. The City and the LPDA mutually agree that during the ensuing year at least two joint meetings will be held in order to develop a mutually satisfactory safety program.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

10 CHAPTER 2 – LEAVES

ARTICLE IX - CATASTROPHIC LEAVE

9.1 Catastrophic leave is available to employees in accordance with the City’s current Catastrophic Leave Policy.

ARTICLE X - HOLIDAYS

10.1 Employees shall receive twelveeleven (121) holiday days. The additional holiday added in 2022 is in recognition of the Juneteenth federal holiday. Hours earned per pay period are dependent upon their work schedule. Schedules and hours received annually are as follows:
a) 12 hour schedule 144 132 hours
b) 10 hour schedule 120 110 hours
c) 8 hour schedule 96 88 hours

Holiday leave is to be taken off at a time mutually agreed upon between the employee and the department head. Holiday time may be taken in one -hour increments during the calendar year.

10.2 Unused holiday leave may not be carried forward into the following calendar year but shall be paid off by the City at the employee’s current straight time rate.

10.3 Employees hired after the first pay period of the year shall be credited with hours for each pay period remaining in the calendar year dependent upon the work schedule assigned.

Schedule and hours received per pay period are as follows:
a) 12 hour schedule 5.54 5.07 hours per pay period
b) 10 hour schedule 4.62 4.23 hours per pay period
c) 8 hour schedule 3.69 3.38 hours per pay period

Employees separating after the first pay period of the year shall have their holiday balances reduced by a number of hours dependent upon work schedule assigned. Schedule and hours deducted per remaining pay period in the year are as follows:
a) 12 hour schedule 5.54 5.07 hours per pay period
b) 10 hour schedule 4.62 4.23 hours per pay period
c) 8 hour schedule 3.69 3.38 hours per pay period

If the employee does not have sufficient holiday hours remaining the difference in hours shall be reduced from other balances for which the employee would be paid.

ARTICLE XI - LEAVES OF ABSENCE

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

11 11.1 Leave of Absence is available to employees in accordance with the City’s current Leave of Absence policy.

ARTICLE XII - SICK LEAVE

12.1 All employees shall accumulate sick leave based on shift worked. Schedule is as follows:
12 hour workday 5.54 hours per pay period
10 hour workday 4.62 hours per pay period
8 hour workday 3.70 hours per pay period

12.2 Sick leave may be accumulated up to an unlimited amount.

12.3 Family sick leave may be used in accordance with Federal and State law.

ARTICLE XIII - VACATION LEAVE

13.1 0 - 1 year - none. However, at the completion of twelve (12) continuous months of service, eighty (80) hours of vacation will be credited to the employee’s account. a) 1 through 5 years: 3.08 hours per pay period
b) 6 through 11 years: 4.62 hours per pay period
c) 12 through 14 years: 5.24 hours per pay period
d) 15 years and more: 6.16 hours per pay period

13.2 First choice vacation leave is picked by seniority. Second choice vacation leave is selected upon completion of first choice vacation leave. All vacation picks will be based upon seniority. However, if seniority is waived by an employee, the employee must wait until seniority list is exhausted prior to picking another vacation.

13.3 The maximum amount of unused vacation hours that an employee may accrue, at any given time is twice the employee’s annual vacation entitlement. Whenever an employee’s unused, accrued vacation has reached this maximum accrual amount, the employee shall stop accruing any additional vacation. Accrual will automatically resume once the employee uses some vacation and the accrual balance falls below the maximum a ccrual amount.

Under extenuating circumstances, requests to accrue vacation leave over the maximum may be authorized by the City Manager. For all other issues regarding Vacation Leave refer to the City’s Policy of Vacation Leave.

ARTICLE XIV – TIME OFF FOR SCHOOL ACTIVITIES

14.1 An employee may take up to eight (8) hours per month to attend school or child care activities. However, if the employee is scheduled to work a shift greater than 8 hours (i.e., 9, 10, or 12 hours) they may take up to the lesser of twelve (12) hours or their full-shift so

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

12 that they do not have to return to work for the remaining scheduled hours of their shift.

Employees are entitled to use up to 40 hours each year for school or child care activities pursuant to the Family -School Partnership Act. Employees requesting such leave will provide advanced notice to the City.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

13 CHAPTER 3 – INSURANCE BENEFITS AND RETIREMENT

ARTICLE XV - DENTAL, ORTHODONTIA AND VISION INSURANCE

15.1 The City will pay the full cost for employee dental premiums for the employee and eligible dependents. and one-half (1/2) the premium for the employee’s dependent for the current dental plan. The annual maximum benefit is $1,250 for each family member enrolled in the dental plan per calendar year. Effective July 1, 2022, the City shall provide orthodontia benefits up to a lifetime cap of $1,250 for each person covered under the plan.

15.2 The City will provide a vision care plan equivalent to the VSP Plan B with a $25.00 deductible for the employee and dependents. The entire premium shall be paid by the City.

15.3 The City reserves the right to select any dental or chiropractic carrier to administer t he City’s plan.

ARTICLE XVI – MEDICAL INSURANCE

16.1 All employees are offered medical insurance for themselves and dependent (s) through CalPERS medical plans. City shall pay one hundred percent ( 100%) of the premium for the employee’s family category (Family, Employee + 1, Employee Only) for the lowest cost PERS HMO available in Lodi’s geographical area (excluding PORAC).

If an employee waives medical insurance through the City of Lodi, the employee may at their option take the following in cash or deposited into their deferred compensation account:

$692.81 per month for Family
$532.92 per month for Employee + 1
$305.22 per month for Employee Only

In order to qualify for this provision, proof of group insurance must be provided to the City.

16.2 Effective July 1, 2022 January 1, 2018, the City will pay a monthly maximum of the following for each family category:

$1,794.51 $2,005.52 per month for Family
$1,380.39 $1,542.71 per month for Employee + 1
$690.20 $771.35 per month for Employee Only

If employee selects a higher cost plan, employee will pay the difference as a payroll deduction.

16.3 If the Federal or State Government mandate changes in the present health care delivery systems the City and LPDA will reopen the MOU to meet and confer on the issue of health care.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

14 16.4 The City will offer a chiropractic plan equivalent to Landmark benefit.

16.5 The City will maintain a flexible spending account to conform to IRS regulations to be used for premium contributions, dependent care, and/or unreimbursed medical payments for unit members. Effective in plan year 2018, t The Medical Flexible Spending Account (FSA) will includes a carryover provision which allows an active participant to automatically carryover up to the IRS limit ($550 for plan year 2022)$500 to the new plan year. However, amounts over the IRS limit $500 would be forfeited after the final filing date, if left unclaimed.

16.6 Only one family member may carry employee and dependent coverage of City sponsored medical insurance.

ARTICLE XVII - LONG TERM DISABILITY

17.1 A long term disability program, which, coordinated with other disability benefits, shall provide a benefit of 66 2/3% to a maximum of $10,000 per month of the employee’s basic salary in the event of disability. This program commences sixty (60) days from the date of disability. Please refer to the City Policy on Long Term Disability.

17.2 The maximum length of coverage is three (3) years from date of disability.

ARTICLE XVIII - LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE

18.1 The City will provide each covered member a $25,000 accidental death policy in addition to any other life insurance policy or statutory payments that may be due to an employee in the event of death resulting from a line-of-duty injury.

18.2 The City will provide a life insurance program providing an additional $10,000 term life insurance for the employee. Said amount of insurance to reduce to $6,500 at age 70, and to decrease to $5,000 at age 75. In addition, the City will provide $1,500 of life insurance for an empl oyee’s spouse, dependent children under the age of twenty -four (24), and dependent disabled children.

ARTICLE XIX - DEFERRED COMPENSATION

19.1 Employees may voluntarily participate in the City's Deferred Compensation plan as allowed by IRS Code 457(k).

19.2 The City shall match contributions by an employee to a deferred compensation program up to a maximum three percent (3.0%) of the employee’s gross salary.

ARTICLE XX - PERS

20.1 The City agrees to provide the following retirement program and options and to pay the employer's cost for employees deemed to be “classic” employees by PERS:
a) The 2.00% at 55 formula.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

15 b) Final retirement compensation based on the average monthly pay during the highest 36 consecutive months of service.
c) Increased ordinary disability benefits which provide under PERS a 30% benefit after five years of service increasing to a maximum 50% benefit. d) The third level of 1959 survivor benefits.
e) 50% survivor continuation in the event of death after retirement. f) Sick leave conversion.
g) Employee shall pay the full employee share of retirement costs (7%) as calculated by PERS in its annual actuarial valuation.

20.2 The City agrees to provide the following PERS retirement program and to pay the employer’s cost for employees deemed to be “new” employees by PERS under the Public Employee’s Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA):
a) The 2.00% at 62 formula.
b) Final retirement compensation based on the average monthly pay during the highest 36 consecutive months of service.
c) Increased ordinary disability benefits which provide under PERS a 30% benefit after five years of service increasing to a maximum 50% benefit. d) The third level of 1959 survivor benefits.
e) 50% survivor continuation in the event of death after retirement. f) Sick leave conversion.
g) Employee shall pay the full employee share of retirement costs as calculated by PERS in its annual actuarial valuation.

20.3 Effective as soon as administratively possible, in accordance with California Government Code §20516 contract amendment process requirements, each employee in this unit shall pay three percent (3%) towards the employer’s share of CalPERS normal pension cost (cost-sharing). In exchange, the City shall provide a three percent (3%) salary adjustment.

The parties agree that should the parties negotiate the elimination of the three percent cost- sharing by the employee s, the corresponding salary a djustment is subject to reduction, elimination or change through the negotiation process.

ARTICLE XXI - SICK LEAVE CONVERSION

21.1 For all unused sick leave, a represented employee with ten (10) years of employment with the City shall receive medical insurance coverage upon retirement (but not upon resignation or termination) on the following basis:

a) After ten (10) years of employment by the City, fifty percent (50%) of the represented employee’s unused sick leave shall be converted to months of medical insurance at the rate of one (1) month’s premium for employee and dependent coverage for each day of unused sick leave as adjusted herein.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

16 b) For each year that an employee has been employed by the City in excess of ten (10) years, the employee shall be entitled to add two and one-half percent (2 1/2%) to the fifty percent (50%) before converting the unused sick leave to months of insurance.

21.2 The City shall pay up to the City’s liability for medical insurance premiums for retiree and dependent.

21.3 In accordance with the sick leave conversion provisions, a surviving dependent may at their own expense continue medical insurance at the employee -only premium for the same period as if the employee had not died.

21.4 Represented employees who retire from the City of Lodi shall have the option of purchasing, at the employee’s cost, additional medical insurance.

21.5 Out of area retirees may receive reimbursement for medical insurance premiums up to the City’s liability as specified in Section 21.2.

21.6 The City agrees to modify it s contract with PERS to add credit f or unused sick leave per Government Code Section 20862.8. This benefit is available to all employees regardless of the date hire d; however, it is the only sick leave conversion benefit available to employees hired after November 8, 2004. It is agreed that eight hours equals one day for purposes of determining days creditable. If an eligible employee opts to utilize the provisions of Section 21.1, the City will report they have zero hours of unused sick leave.

21.7 The City asserts that the November 8, 2004 date referenced in Section 21.6 is a scrivener’s error and should properly be July 9, 1994. Association contests the City’s position. As a resolution to this matter, the City shall establish a Retiree Health Savings Account (RHSA) for the following employees that were hired into this bargaining group between July 9, 1994 and November 8, 2004. The City shall allocate a lump sum of $75,000.00 to be distributed to the listed employees on a pro -rated amount based on their individual sick leave accrual as of the pay period ending May 17, 2015. The pro -rated amounts shall be deposited into the RHSA as soon as administratively possible. Beginning the first full pay period in 2016, the City shall contribute one percent (1%) of the employees’ base bi-weekly salary, each pay period, into the RHSA until such time as the employee retires, resigns, or separates employment with the City of Lodi.

Maria Butterfield Jeff Humphrey
Tenneill Ramirez Andrea Patterson
Jennifer Root Kimberly Van Tassell

Effective upon adoption, above named employees shall be required to make an irrevocable choice to either convert their previously earned sick leave as described above, moving the existing balance into a closed ba nk of hours (Bank A) , which shall be available only for use as sick leave by the employee , or to decline the conversion as described above and maintain one bank of hours which may be used for sick leave by the employee and in accordance with Section 21.6 referencing PERS service credit provision. Hours in Bank A shall not be eligible for catastrophic leave donations.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

17 Employees who opt into the RHSA shall have future sick leave hours deposited into Sick Leave Bank B. Sick Leave Bank B hours may be used by t he employee for sick leave or towards CalPERS service credit upon retirement as described in Section 21.6. Sick Leave Bank B hours may also be donated under the City’s c atastrophic leave policy. Sick Leave Bank B hours shall be valued at the employee’s current regular hourly rate of pay; however, these hours shall have no cash value.

Employees utilizing sick leave hours shall first draw from Bank A hours. If no Bank A hours exist, then Bank B hours shall be used.

ARTICLE XXII - TUITION REIMBURSEMENT

22.1 Tuition reimbursement shall be available to employees as stated in the City’s current Tuition Reimbursement policy.

22.2 The City shall allow LPDA members the option of using up to $300 per fiscal year the funds referenced in section 22.1 for work-related training seminars, symposiums, etc., that are not reimbursable by the City under the Tuition Reimbursement Policy. Up to $300.00 per fiscal year may be used for tuition reimbursement to obtain an AA degree. All training and time off for training must be approved in advance by the department head.

ARTICLE XXIII - WORKERS' COMPENSATION

23.1 When an employee is compelled to be absent from work due to injuries or illness arising out of and in the course of their employment, the City will pay full compens ation to any represented employee who becomes eligible for benefits under Workers' Compensation laws for the period of the time between the injury and the first day of eligibility for benefits.

With the determination that the injury or illness is compensa ble in accordance with Workers' Compensation benefit criteria, the employee upon receiving said benefits paid by Workers' Compensation will also receive compensation from the City in such an amount that when added to the Workers' Compensation payment will equal the employee’s regular salary. The amount paid by the City will, after the period from the date of injury and date of eligibility, be charged to the employee's sick leave account. The employee's regular deductions shall be made from the amount paid by the City.

a) Bargaining unit members shall have the presumption afforded by Labor Code Section 3212.5 regarding pneumonia (but not heart trouble) and the presumption afforded by Labor Code Section 3212.6 regarding tuberculosis. Moreover, bargaining unit members who can establish exposure to bodily fluids shall have the presumption afforded by Labor Code Section 3212.8 regarding blood born e infectious diseases and MRSA and Labor Code Section 3212.9 regarding meningitis.

23.2 In the event an employee is injured or otherwise becomes disabled:
a) By contact with a prisoner or member of the public in the course of employment or,

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

18 b) While performing evidence technician assignments.

The City shall supplement the Workers' Compensation payment to the extent that the employee shall receive their regular salary and benefits for up to one (1) year. Thereafter, the employee may be eligible for the Long Term Disability (LTD) program , per Article XVII. Please refer to the City Policy on Long Term Disability

23.3 The City supplement will end at the earliest of the following:
a) Permanent and stationary rating of employee.
b) Return to duty or physician’s release.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

19 CHAPTER 4 – ASSOCIATION/CITY ISSUES

ARTICLE XXIV - CITY RIGHTS

24.1 Nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed to waive or reduce any rights of the City, which include but are not limited to the exclusive rights to:
a) decide the scope of service to be performed and the method of service b) hire and/or otherwise determine the criteria and standards of selection for employment c) fire, demote, suspend or otherwise discipline for just cause d) transfer employees from location to location and from time to time e) lay off and/or relieve employees from duty due to lack of work or any other legitimate reason
f) re-hire employees
g) determine the allocation and content of job classification h) formulate and/or amend job descriptions
i) to determine the need for overtime work subject only to contrary provisions of this MOU
j) merge, consolidate, expand, curtail or discontinue operation temporarily or permanently in whole or in part, whenever in the sole discretion of the City good business judgment makes such curtailment or discontinuance advisable k) contract and/or subcontract any existing or future work l) control the use of equipment and property by the City m) determine the number, location and operation of headquarters, annexes, substations and or division thereof
n) expand, reduce, alter, combine, assign or cease any job o) schedule and assign the work to the employees and determine the size and composition of the work force
p) determine the services to be provided to the public, and the maintenance procedures, materials, facilities, and equipment to be used, a nd to introduce new or improved serviced, maintenance procedures, materials, facilities and equipment q) take whatever action may be necessary to carry out the mission and responsibility of the City and specifically the Police Department in unusual and/or emergency situations
r) formulate, amend , revise, and implement standard operating procedures, rules, and regulations regarding the operation of the Police Department s) establish, amend, revise and implement any programs, and or procedures including an employee evaluation system

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

20 t) require employees to observe and obey the City’s and Departmental policies, procedures, ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations

However, the exercise by the City of the rights in the paragraph does not preclude employees of their recognized employee organizations from filing grievances regarding the practical consequences that decisions on such matters may have on wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment.

ARTICLE XXV - CHANGES IN MEMORANDUM

25.1 The parties agree to reopen this MOU and to renew meeting and conferring on the subjects set forth herein during the term of this MOU only in the event that any provision of this MOU is modified by statute, applicable regulation, or by order of Court in such a way as to affect either the employees or the City. In such event, all remaining provisions of the MOU would continue in full force and effect unless and until they were also modified by statute, applicable regulation or order of Court, or agreement of the parties.

ARTICLE XXVI - EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION

26.1 This Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter referred to as "MOU") is entered into between representatives of the City of Lodi (hereinafter referred to as "City") and representatives of the Lodi Police Dispatchers Association (hereinafter referred to as "LPDA").
a) The parties to this MOU acknowledge and agree that this MOU constitutes the result of meeting and conferring in good faith as contemplated by Sections 3500 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California, and further acknowledge and agree that all matters upon which the parties reached agreement are set forth in this MOU.

If the City intends to change a matter within the scope of representation under the Meyers-Millias-Brown Act (MMBA) which is not covered by this MOU, it shall notify the LPDA. If the LPDA wishes to negotiate over such a matter, it shall notify the City within twenty (20) work days of notice, and the parties shall commence negotiations within twenty (20) work days of the LPDA’s notification. If the LPDA does not respond within twenty (20) work days of the City’s notification, the City will have no further obligation to negotiate over the matter. b) The terms and conditions of this MOU are applicable to all regular and probationary employees represented by LPDA. Those classifications are as follows:
 Community Services Officer
 Dispatcher/Jailer
 Lead Dispatcher/Jailer
 Property & Evidence Technician

26.2 Dues - The City shall grant dues deduction to City employees who are members of the LPDA in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Section 4, Rule 2 of City of Lodi Resolution No. 3344 entitled, "Adopting Rules and Regulations to Implement Provisions of the Employee-Employer Relations Resolution."

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

21 a) Any dues check -off cancellation or modification notice shall first be forwarded to LPDA for notation and then returned to Payroll prior to any change in members’ dues check-off. In addition, any d ues check -off cancellation or modification notice regarding the Police Officers' Association of Lodi (POAL) shall first be forwarded to POAL for notation and then returned to Payroll prior to any change in a member’s dues check-off to POAL.
b) The LPDA shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City of Lodi harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the City of Lodi on account of check-off of said employee organization's dues. In addition, the LPDA shall refund to the City of Lodi any amounts paid to it in error upon presentation of supporting evidence.
c) Effective upon adoption of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and for the purposes of the continued certification of LPDA as the recognized employee organization for this unit, employees in this unit who are or hereafter become members of LPDA shall maintain membership in good standing with LDPA for the life of this MOU, except that any unit employee may withdraw from membership not earlier than ninety (90) days nor less than sixty (60) days from the expiration of this MOU. Such withdrawal must be in writing and delivered to LPDA and the Finance Department within the prescribed time frame.

26.3 The City agrees to furnish LPDA with a written notice of the City's intention to make changes in departmental rules, policies or procedures that would affect the working conditions of LPDA members, notwithstanding Article XXIV.

26.4 LPDA will have the right to use city facilities for association business subject to advance notice and availability.

26.5 If any section of the MOU in any way conflicts with the terms and conditions of employment stated in other authorities, such as the personnel rules, administrative policy and procedure manual, City resolutions, or City ordinances, any ambiguity will be resolved in favor of the MOU language. If the MOU is silent on any issue, the applicable document is controlling.

ARTICLE XXVII - EMPLOYEES RIGHTS

27.1 Individual bargaining unit members may donate from their vacation or holiday leave time up to eight (8) hours per calendar year for Association business. The President may designate members of the Association to utilize this time. Only one member at a time may be absent unless it is mutually agreed that additional members may be ab sent. Five (5) days’ advance notice of use of time shall be given.

27.2 The City will provide affected employees with copies of personnel orders as soon as the personnel orders are issued. Personnel orders are defined as all written notices of actual disciplinary actions, notices of intent to take disciplinary actions, transfer notices, promotion notices and termination notices.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

22 27.3 Any LPDA member who is to be interviewed concerning an act which, if proven, could reasonably result in disciplinary action will be afforded the following safeguards:

a) LPDA member will be informed prior to the interview if the City believes the LPDA member is a suspect in the investigation.
b) The LPDA member will be informed of the nature of the investigations and allegations and afforded the opportunity to consult with a LPDA representative prior to an interview. The LPDA member shall be allowed the right to have an LPDA representative present during the interview.
c) The City shall make a reasonable good faith effort to conduct these interviews during the employee's regular working hours except for emergencies or where interviews can be conducted by telephone. Section 27.3 (a) and (b) notwithstanding. d) Interviews shall be done under circumstances devoid of intim idation, abuse, or coercion. No more than two (2) interviewers may be present at any one time. e) The employee shall be entitled to reasonable intermissions to attend to personal necessities.
f) If the City tape records the interview, the member also has the right to tape the interview. If the interview is taped by either party that party must give notice of its intention.
g) Interviews and investigations shall be concluded with no unreasonable delay. h) The employee shall be advised of the results of the investigation and any future action to be taken on the incident.
i) When the investigation results in Departmental charges being filed against the employee, the employee, upon request, will be furnished with a copy of the reports of the investigation which contain all known material facts of the matter, to include any tape recordings, at no cost. The employee will also be furnished with the names of all witnesses and complainants who are to appear against the employee and/or whose statements may be used against the employee.

27.4 The performance of each LPDA member shall be evaluated annually. Performance evaluations shall be based on work performance related criteria.

a) When an employee is rated unsatisfactorily in any category, the supervisor shall state the reason(s) for such rating and shall, if practicable, suggest means of improvement. b) After the evaluation is made, the employee shall be given a copy. Either the supervisor or employee may request to meet and discuss the evaluation.

27.5 Each employee shall, during normal business hours , have the right of access to their own personnel file. At the employee's request they shall be provided one copy of any document placed in the employee's file. LPDA members will be given a li st of all personnel files held by the City and any department personnel used for promotion and disciplinary actions.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

23 a) An employee shall have the right to inspect and review any official record relating to their performance as an employee which is kept or maintained in the employee's personnel file. The City shall provide an opportunity for the employee to respond in writing to any information with which the employee disagrees. Such response shall become a permanent part of the employee's personnel record. The employee shall be responsible for providing the written responses to be included as part of the employee's permanent record.
b) The only persons permitted to have access to the contents of an employee's personnel folder, excluding background investigation references from previous employers, are the employee, their designated representative having the employee's signed authorization, and persons authorized by the City.
c) Employees will receive a copy of all materials placed in their file. Written reprimands more than two (2) years old will not be considered for purposes of promotion, transfer, special assignments and disciplinary actions, except as to those disciplinary actions which show patterns of mis conduct as defined in the Department's Rules and Regulations.
d) Anything less than a written reprimand shall be purged from an employee's personnel file after an evaluation is given. Requests to purge personnel files are the responsibility of the individual involved.

27.6 All special assignments available to LPDA members shall be posted and shall invite letters of interest from LPDA members.

27.7 All special assignment positions shall be limited to three (3) to five (5) years and will begin and end at shift pick changes. Those assigned will report to the immediate supervisor that is in charge of the department. The Chief reserves the right to ask for letters of interest during shift pick changes during this time. If no application s of interest have b een submitted for the position, the employee holding the position may be extended for a period of two more years after the third year. It is also mutually agreed that assignments to Property Clerk and/or Court Liaison positions are at the sole discretion of the City of Lodi.

No employee has property rights to such assignments and waives any appeals for assignment, reassignment, or transfer from this agreement.

ARTICLE XXVIII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

28.1 This grievance procedure shall be used to process and resolve disputes regarding the interpretation or application of any of the terms and conditions of this MOU, letters of understanding, formal interpretations and clarifications executed by the LPDA and the City.

a) The intent of this procedure is to resolve grievances informally at the lowest possible level and to provide an orderly procedure for reviewing and resolving grievances promptly.
b) The term "day" means a working day, i.e. Monday through Friday excluding fixed City Hall holidays.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

24 c) A grievance is a good faith complaint of one or a group of employees or a dispute between the City and the LPDA involving the interpretation, application, or enforcement of the express terms of the Agreement and other terms and conditions of employment and matters of discipline which includes demotion, suspension, or discharge.
d) As used in this procedure, the term "party" means an employee, the LPDA, the City , or the authorized representative of any party. The employee is entitled to representation through all the steps in the grievance procedure.

28.2 INFORMAL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

a) An employee, the LPDA, or their representative having an issue arising from employment in the municipal service shall seek adjustment of the issue initially through verbal contact with their immediate supervisor within twenty (20) working days of the date of the action being grieved, or the date the grieving party became aware of the incident which is the basis of the issue. Should the immediate supervisor be unable to make a satisfactory adjustment, or is a party to the issue, the employee, LPDA, or their representative may seek adjustment through either verbal or written contact to the next higher level of supervision up to and including the Chief of Police who shall render a decision in writing within ten (10) working days of hearing the appeal. The time allowed between steps in this process is ten (10) working days. All verbal contacts shall be documented as to the date, time and place of the contact. b) Should the employee, LPDA or their representative, progress through the above steps and find that the Department Head is unable to make a satisfactory adjustment within the tim eframe given, or is a party to the issue, the employee, LPDA , or their representative ma y seek adjustment through the formal grievance procedure. Any decision by City at this step shall be a written decision rendered within ten (10) working days of hearing the appeal.

28.3 FORMAL PROCEDURE

An employee who has not received satisfactory adjustment through the use of the Informal Grievance Procedure may, within ten (10) working days of the last time deadline of the Informal Procedure, file a Formal Grievance. The steps of the Formal Grievance Procedure are as follows:

STEP A
Class action grievances are filed, in writing, with the City Manager and can only be made by the LPDA president or representative upon the authority of the LPDA. Grievances that affect individual employees may be filed, in writing, with the City Manager by the affected employee, the LPDA, or their representative. The City Manager shall investigate the grievance and shall respond in writing within ten (10) working days. If satisfactory adjustment is not attained the employee, LPDA, or their representative may proceed to Step B within ten (10) working days.

STEP B

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

25 The employee, LPDA, or their representative shall file an appeal of the City Manager’s decision to the City Clerk. Within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of the appeal, the City Clerk shall b egin the process of establishing a list of eligibles for a Personnel Board of Review. The Personnel Board of Review shall hold a public hearing, unless the grievant desires a closed hearing, within thirty (30) working days of the filing of the appeal with the City Clerk. The Personnel Board of Review has no power to add to, subtract from or modify the terms or conditions of this MOU; nor, do they have any power to add a greater form of disciplinary action than that which was originally grieved. Within fifteen (15) days after the hearing, the Personnel Board of Review shall submit a written statement of findings and directions to the City Manager, the employee, and the LPDA. The directions of the Board shall be binding on all parties to the MOU.

The Personnel Board of Review shall be constituted as follows:

1) Both the LPDA and the City will select a representative to serve on the three-member board. Board members must be registered to vote in the City of Lodi and may not be a current or former elected official, employee of the City, or related to a present or former elected official or employee of the City.
2) The City Clerk shall submit the names of seven (7) persons applying for positions to the Personnel Board of Review to both parties. The criter ia of qualifications are the same as in Step One. If there are not seven (7) persons from the list each party may select from the available names or ask the City Clerk to post for a vacancy(ies ). If there are more than seven (7) names, seven (7) names will be drawn by lot which shall be witnessed by the parties chosen in Step One.
3) The two persons selected in Step One shall select a third member from the list, either by agreement, lot, striking names, or any other means the two can agree upon.

28.4 Any employee shall have the right to appeal letters of reprimand and suspensions of three (3) days or less through the chain of command up to the Police Chief or designee. The decision of the Police Chief or designee is final and binding and not subject to further appeal.

28.5 FAILURE TO MEET TIME REQUIREMENTS

Failure by either party to meet any of the aforementioned time limits shall result in the following action:

Failure by an employee to take the initial grievance action within the twenty (20) working days given in the Informal Grievance Procedure will result in forfeiture of the grievance.

Failure of management to meet any of the time limits set forth on any step in this grievance procedure will give the employee the right to automatically pro ceed to the next level of appeal. This action must be taken within ten (10) working days of the last date of the time limit which management failed to meet.

ARTICLE XXIX - MUTUAL CONSENT CONTINGENCY

29.1 This Agreement may be amended any time with the mutual consent of the City and LPDA.

Such amendment must be in writing and attached to all executed copies of this Agreement.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

26 ARTICLE XXX - NO STRIKES

30.1 The represented employees agree that they shall not strike, withhold services, engage in "slow downs" or "sick-ins", or participate in any other concerted activity which adversely affects job performance or city services during the term of this MOU.

ARTICLE XXXI - RESERVED

ARTICLE XXXII - PROBATION

32.1 All appointments to positions in the classified service shall be subject to a probationary period of eighteen (18) continuous months of service. The probationary period shall be regarded as an integral part of the examination process and shall be used to closely observe the employee's work for securing the most effective adjustment of an employee to their new duties, assignments and responsibilities in the new position and for rejecting any probationary employee whose performance does not meet required work standards. If the service of the employee is deemed to be unsatisfactory, the employee shall be notified that they have not satisfactorily completed probation.

32.2 During the probationary period, all new hires shall have all the rights and privileges afforded to other employees, except:

1) Vacation Leave - See Article XIII for the vacation leave schedule. 2) The use of the Grievance Procedure to grieve termination. 3) The City and the employee may mutually agree to extend the probationary period for not more than six (6) months. The LPDA shall be notified of all extensions. 4) Probation shall be extended for the same time as any leaves of absence.

32.3 In the event an employee is promoted and is rejected by the appropriate department head, the employee shall be reinstated to the position from which the employee was promoted unless charges are filed and the employee is discharged. The seniority and status of a rejected candidate shall continue as before.

ARTICLE XXXIII - PROMOTION

33.1 The City and the LPDA mutually agree it is good personnel practice to make every effort to promote from within, consistent with the best interests of the City.

ARTICLE XXXIV - SENIORITY

34.1 Seniority, for purposes of city employee benefits is defined as the total length of continuous service with the City. Continuity of service shall not be broken and seniority shall accrue when an employee is:

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

27 a) inducted, enlists, or is called to active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States or service in the Merchant Marine under any Act of Congress which provides that the employee is entitled to re-employment rights;
b) on duty with the National Guard’
c) is absent due to industrial injury;
d) on leave of absence; or
e) absent due to layoff for a period of less than twelve (12) consecutive months.

34.2 Seniority for purposes of shift selection, overtime, holiday selection , and vacation leave shall be defined as total time in service as a member of the bargaining unit. S hould a member of the unit leave membership for any reason and return to membership within twelve (12) months, seniority shall be as if the member never left.

34.3 Seniority, as defined above, shall be the method utilized for shift selection and vacation leave.

34.4 In the event an employee completes training before another employee with the same or more City seniority for purposes specified in section 34.2, the employee completing training first will have seniority for purposes of shift selection.

ARTICLE XXXV - STATUS

35.1 Employees shall be designated as regular, probationary, or temporary, depending upon the purpose for which they are hired and their length of continuous service with the City.

a) A regular employee is defined as an employee who has (twelve) 12 months or more seniority with the City in full -time employment, except as provided for in Article XXXII - Probation.
b) A probationary employee is defined as an employee hired for a full-time position that has been regularly established as an a uthorized position and is of indeterminate duration. A probationary employee shall receive not less than the minimum rate for the job and shall be eligible for sick leave pay, vacation pay, holiday pay, retirement plan participation, insurance coverage, a nd items of a similar nature as he or she becomes eligible, but shall not be given preferential consideration for promotion or transfer or be eligible for a leave of absence. Upon completion of (twelve) 12 months of continuous full-time service with City, a probationary employee shall be given the status of a regular employee.
c) A temporary employee is an employee hired on a full -time basis to temporarily fill a full-time position (at least 32 hours per week). Temporary employees shall attain regular status after being employed for twelve (12) continuous months.

ARTICLE XXXVI - TERM

36.1 All terms and conditions of this MOU shall continue in effect during the term of this MOU.

The City of Lodi and LPDA agree that the term is July 1, 202219 through June 30, 202522.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

28 36.2 The LPDA and City will commence negotiations for a new contract no later than three (3) months prior to the expiration of this MOU.

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

29 EXHIBIT A – SALARY SCHEDULE

Salary Schedule Effective 7/11/2022:

Date Step 0 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
Community Services Officer 7/11/2022 56,073.61$ 58,877.31$ 61,821.30$ 64,912.32$ 68,157.84$ Dispatcher/Jailer 7/11/2022 63,810.83$ 67,001.30$ 70,351.46$ 73,868.97$ 77,562.40$ Lead Dispatcher/Jailer 7/11/2022 67,670.85$ 71,054.34$ 74,607.03$ 78,337.40$ 82,254.17$ Property & Evidence Technician 7/11/2022 56,073.61$ 58,877.31$ 61,821.30$ 64,912.32$ 68,157.84$

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION – MOU – JULY 1, 202219 – JUNE 30, 20252

30 CITY OF LODI
AND

LODI POLICE DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION
J U L Y 1 , 2 022 19 - J U N E 3 0 , 2 025 22

Lodi Police Dispatchers Association: City of Lodi:

Jaime Worthen Stephen Schwabauer
Lead Dispatcher/Jailer City Manager
Date:____________________ Date:___________________

________________________________
Tenneill Ramirez Andrew Keys
Dispatcher/Jailer Deputy City Manager
Date:____________________ Date:___________________

________________________________
Kim VanTassel Adele Post
Property & Evidence Technician Human Resources Manager Date:____________________ Date:___________________

________________________________
Holly Huber-Miller
Dispatcher/Jailer
Date:____________________

Approved as to form:
____________________________
Jayma Sareeram _____________________________ Dispatcher/Jailer Janice D. Magdich
Date:____________________ City Attorney
Date:

Attest:
___________________________
Dan L. Koontz _____________________________
Labor Relations Consultant Olivia Nashed
Date: ___________________ City Clerk
Date:__________

AGENDA ITEM H-05

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPROVED: ________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Approving a Salary Differential of Five Percent for Unrepresented / Confidential Classifications That Have a Represented Counterpart MEETING DATE: July 20, 2022
PREPARED BY: Human Resources Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution approving a salary differential of five percent for unrepresented/confidential classifications that have a represented counterpart.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Historically, the City provided a five percent salary differential between positions within the unrepresented/ confidential group s over that of their represented counter parts.

Over the past few years, the City created new unrepresented/confidential classifications and reactivated one classification. The salary ranges for the unrepresented/confidential classifications were implemented without providing the historical five percent salary differential between the unrepresented position and the represented position. In addition, other unrepresented/confidential classifications ha ve been filled for a number of years where the differential has not been provided. City staff propose to provide the differential for all impacted unrepresented/confidential positions.

Unrepresented classifications are those that are not represented by a recognized labor or professional organization. Employees in these classifications do not have an association or union that bargains on their behalf and they are not governed by a collective bargaining agreement. Confidential positions are positions that ordinarily would be part of a bargaining unit , but have been removed from the represented bargaining unit to prevent a fundamental conflict of interest that would undermine the employer-union relationship in the collective bargaining process. A Confiden tial employee has access to confidential information relating to the City’s administration of employer-employee relations and bargaining. Unrepresented/Confidential positions typically reside in the City Manager’s Office, the City Attorney’s Office, and the Human Resources and Budget Divisions of the Internal Services Department.

Staff proposes to adjust the salary ranges for the unrepresented/confidential classification s to provide a five percent salary differential over that of the salary range for represented classifications . This five percent differential will be in addition to any other wage differences that occurred due to varying CalPERS cost-sharing agreements between represented positions and unrepresented positions. The differential will not be provided to single unrepresented/confidential classifications that do not have a represented counter part (i.e., Human Resources Manager).

The current classifications that have both a represented and unrepresented classification are:

Represented Classification Unrepresented/Confidential Classification Administrative Clerk Confidential Administrative Clerk Senior Administrative Clerk Confidential Senior Administrative Clerk Administrative Assistant Confidential Administrative Assistant Finance Technician Confidential Human Resources/Risk Technician Administrative Analyst Confidential Administrative Analyst Management Analyst Confidential Human Resources Management Analyst/ Confidential Budget Analyst

Staff recommends that Council approve the Resolution to provide a five percent salary differential for the above listed classifications and for other Council approved unrepresented/confidential classifications.

FISCAL IMPACT: The annual cost of the proposed resolution is approximately $20,000 and impacts a total of eight unrepresented/confidential employees

FUNDING AVAILABLE: All additional costs will be absorbed within existing appropriations.

_________________________________
Adele Post, Human Resources Manager

_________________________________
Andrew Keys, Deputy City Manager

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A

FIVE PERCENT SALARY DIFFERENTIAL

FOR UNREPRESENTED/CONFIDENTIAL JOB

CLASSIFICATIONS ABOVE REPRESENTED CLASSFICATIONS
========================================================================

WHEREAS, the City has represented and unrepresented/confidential job classifications within the classification plan; and

WHEREAS, employees in the unrepresented/confidential classifications do not have an association or union that bargains on their behalf and they are not governed by a collective bargaining agreement; and

WHEREAS, unrepresented/confidential positions are positions that ordinarily would be part of a bargaining unit, but have been removed from the represented bargaining unit to prevent a fundamental conflict of interest that would undermine the employer -union relationship in the collective bargaining process; and

WHEREAS, an unrepresented/confidential employee has access to confidential information relating to the City’s adm inistration of employer-employee relations and bargaining; and

WHEREAS, it is recommended that Council approve revisions to the salary schedule to provide a five percent (5%) differential for Council approved unrepresented/confidential job classifications where there is a comparable represented position; and

WHEREAS, the five percent differential is in addition to any other salary variations between classifications due to different CalPERS cost-sharing amounts.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve a five percent salary differential for unrepresented/confidential classif ications as listed in Exhibit A.

Date: July 20, 2022
========================================================================

I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2022-____ was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held July 20, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk

2022-____

EXHIBIT A
Annual Salaries of Unrepresented/Confidential Classifications

Classification Date Step 0 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
Administrative Clerk (Conf) 1/10/22 $ 41,325.53 $ 43,391.81 $ 45,561.41 $ 47,839.49 $ 50,231.45 Senior Administrative Clerk
(Conf)
4/18/22 $ 45,443.94 $ 47,716.08 $ 50,101.99 $ 52,607.05 $ 55,237.46 Administrative Assistant (Conf) 7/25/22 $ 54,952.91 $ 57,700.64 $ 60,585.69 $ 63,614.95 $ 66,795.66 Human Resources Technician
(Conf)
7/25/22 $ 55,201.58 $ 57,961.71 $ 60,859.78 $ 63,902.88 $ 67,097.90 Risk Management Technician
(Conf)
7/25/22 $ 55,201.58 $ 57,961.71 $ 60,859.78 $ 63,902.88 $ 67,097.90 Administrative Analyst (Conf) 7/25/22 $ 65,047.96 $ 68,300.36 $ 71,715.38 $ 75,301.14 $ 79,066.21 Human Resources
Management Analyst (Conf)
7/25/22 $ 76,856.96 $ 80,699.78 $ 84,733.94 $ 88,972.28 $ 93,420.12 Budget Analyst (Conf) 7/25/22 $ 76,856.96 $ 80,699.78 $ 84,733.94 $ 88,972.28 $ 93,420.12

AGENDA ITEM H-06

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPR
OVED: _________________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
\\cvcfilv02\pubwks$\WP\COUNCIL\2022\CC GSP Amendment 1.doc 7/7/2022 AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution to Adopt Amended Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan
M
EETING DATE: July 20, 2022
P
REPARED BY: Public Works Director
RE
COMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution to Adopt Amended Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan.

B
ACKGROUND INFORMATION: On August 29, 2014, the California Legislature passed comprehensive groundwater legislation enacting the “Sustainable Groundwater Management Act” (SGMA). Governor Brown signed the legislation on September 16, 2014 and it became effective on January 1, 2015.

S
GMA requires the formation of groundwater sustainability agencies (GSA’s) and the development and implementation of one or more groundwater sustainability plans (GSP’s) for each groundwater basin categorized by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as high- or medium-priority.

T
he Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority (Authority) is a collaboration of agencies (including Lodi) within the county working to prepare a GSP in accordance with the SGMA legislation. The Authority submitted a GSP in January of 2020 to DWR, and has since received feedback from DWR which identified two potential deficiencies in the plan. The deficiencies must be addressed by amending the GSP and the amended GSP must be adopted by each GSA prior to resubmitting to DWR. A subcommittee made up of various Authority members along with Woodard & Curran, Inc., the consultant originally hired by the Authority to prepare the GSP, prepared responses to the potential deficiencies noted below. While the responses reflected below are highly summarized, the responses reflecting all of the support data and analysis are included in four, technically robust memorandums that will serve as appendices to the amended GSP.

P
otential Deficiency No.1 cites the GSP lacks sufficient justification for identifying that undesirable results for chronic lowering of groundwater levels, subsidence, and depletion of interconnected surface waters can only occur in consecutive non-dry water year types. Deficiency No. 1 also cites the GSP lacks sufficient explanation for its chronic lowering of groundwater level minimum thresholds and undesirable results. In response to this comment, the GSP is amended to remove the water year type from the minimum threshold.

Additionally, technical hydrogeological data has been provided to support the minimum threshold definitions used in the GSP. This detailed information is outlined in three technical memorandums that will be made part of the amended GSP.

Adopt Resolution to Adopt Amended Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan July 20, 2022

\\cvcfilv02\pubwks$\WP\COUNCIL\2022\CC GSP Amendment 1.doc 7/7/2022 Potential Deficiency No. 2 cites the GSP does not provide enough information to support the use of the chronic lowering of groundwater level sustainable management criteria and representative monitoring network as a proxy for land subsidence. In response to this comment, the GSP is amended to include subsidence data from publicly available monitoring sources, and this data will be updated and reviewed in the preparation of each annual report. An additional technical memorandum was prepared to more thoroughly document the correlation between chronic lowering of groundwater levels and subsidence.

Additionally, this memorandum outlined the types of critical infrastructure which would be most impacted by subsidence, as requested.

At the June 21, 2022 Shirtsleeve Meeting, Staff presented Council and the public with an update on the GSP status, the potential deficiencies identified in the DWR comments that were received on the original submitted GSP, and information reflecting the proposed responses to addressing those deficiencies as part of the GSP amendment. Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution to adopt the Amended Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan.

The amended GSP is available for review on the City’s website at https://www.lodi.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3014/ESJ-GSP-Final-Draft. SGMA legislation requires GSP adoption by all involved GSA’s prior to the amended GSP submittal date of July 27, 2022.

There are no forecasted changes to our water operations as a result of adopting the amended GSP, largely because the City has made substantial investments to reduce groundwater pumping to a sustainable level. Staff recommends adopting the amended GSP as presented, as failure to adopt the amended GSP could result in state intervention.

FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.

FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.

_______________________________
Charles E. Swimley, Jr.

Public Works Director
CES/CES/cd

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING

THE AMENDED EASTERN SAN JOAQUIN GROUNDWATER

BASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
========================================================================

WHEREAS, on August 29, 2014, the California Legislature passed comprehensive groundwater legislation enacting the “Sustainable Groundwater Management Act” (SGMA).

Governor Brown signed the legislation on September 16, 2014 and it became effective on January 1, 2015; and

WHEREAS, SGMA requires the formation of groundwater sustainability agencies (GSA’s) and the development and implementation of one or more groundwater sustainability plans (GSP’s) for each groundwater basin categorized by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as high- or medium-priority; and

WHEREAS, at the June 21, 2022 Shirtsleeve Meeting, s taff presented Council and the public with an update on the GSP status, the potential deficiencies identified in the DWR comments that were received on the origi nal submitted GSP, and information reflecting the proposed responses to addressing those deficiencies as part of the GSP amendment; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends adopting the Amended Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby adopt the Amended Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan.

Dated: July 20, 2022
======================================================================== I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2022- ____ was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held July 20, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk

2022-____
AGENDA ITEM I-01

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
APPR
OVED: ________________________________
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Ordinance No. 2003 Entitled, “An Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Amending Lodi Municipal Code Title 17 – Development Code – Article 3, ‘Site Planning and General Development Standards,’ Chapter 17.34, ‘Signs,’ by Adding Section 17.34.070.H, ‘Electronic Message Signs on City Property,’ and by Amending Section 17.34.060.C.B.3 to Revise the Standards for Signs in the GC and Industrial Zoning Districts” M
EETING DATE: July 20, 2022
P
REPARED BY: City Clerk
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion waiving reading in full and (following reading by title) adopting the attached Ordinance No. 2003.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Ordinance No. 2003 entitled, “An Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Amending Lodi Municipal Code Title 17 – Development Code – Article 3, ‘Site Planning and General Development Standards,’ Chapter 17.34, ‘Signs,’ by Adding Section 17.34.070.H, ‘Electronic Message Signs on City Property,’ and by Amending Section

17.34.060.C.B.3 to Revise the Standards for Signs in the GC and Industrial Zoning Districts,” was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of June 15, 2022.

ADOPTION: With the exception of urgency ordinances, no ordinance may be passed within five days of its introduction. Two readings are therefore required – one to introduce and a second to adopt the ordinance.

Ordinances may only be passed at a regular meeting or at an adjourned regular meeting; except for urgency ordinances, ordinances may not be passed at a special meeting. Id. All ordinances must be read in full either at the time of introduction or at the time of passage, unless a regular motion waiving further reading is adopted by a majority of all council persons present. Cal. Gov’t Code § 36934.

Ordinances take effect 30 days after their final passage. Cal. Gov’t Code § 36937.

This ordinance has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.

FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.
_______________________________

Olivia Nashed
City Clerk
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO. 2003

AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING LODI MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 17 – DEVELOPMENT CODE – ARTICLE 3, “SITE PLANNING AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,” CHAPTER 17.34, “SIGNS,” BY ADDING SECTION 17.34.070.H, “ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SIGNS ON CITY PROPERTY,” AND BY AMENDING SECTION 17.34.060.C.B.3 TO REVISE THE

STANDARDS FOR SIGNS IN THE GC AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS ========================================================================

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Lodi Municipal Code Title 17 – Development Code – Article 3, “Site Planning and General Development Standards ,” Chapter 17.34, “Signs,” is h ereby amended by adding Section 17.34.070.H, “Community Electronic Message Signs,” as follows:

17.34.070 – Standards for Specific Sign Types
H. Electronic Message Signs on City Property
This sign type is intended to provide for the location of electronic message signs incorporating an illuminated LED panel at City-owned facilities throughout Lodi. Electronic Message Signs on City Property are subject to the following:

1. Locations.

Electronic Message Signs on City Property shall be placed only on City -owned or City - controlled property, regardless of the zoning of the property.

2. Sign Type. Electronic Message Signs on City Property must be one of the following types.

a. Monument (ground-mounted on a base)
b. Pole (elevated above the ground on a central support) c. Building-mounted (affixed to a building)

3. Brightness. The following standards apply to the brightness of Electronic Message Signs on City Property:

a. Maximum brightness of the LED panel for any sign is 7,500 nits. b. Brightness mus t be controlled to automatically adjust the sign to respond to ambient lighting conditions and reduce glare and spillover to adjacent properties. c. A lower maximum lighting level may be imposed through the Conditional Use Permit for an individual sign.

4. Enclosures and Supports. Sign enclosures and supports must be designed to be compatible with the architecture of buildings on the site.

2 5. Number and Spacing of Signs.

a. Any number of signs may be placed on a parcel, subject to approval by the Planning Commission.
b. No specific spacing is required between signs, except that the Planning Commission may impose a spacing requirement based on site-specific circumstances as part of the review of the Conditional Use Permit for an individual sign.

6. Height, Size, Hours of Operation, and Other Standards. Standards for the various types of Electronic Message Signs on City Property are as follows.

a. Monument Sign

i. Maximum height is ten (10) feet, including the height of the sign base. ii. Maximum screen size is four (4) feet high by eight (8) feet wide. iii. Sign may be single or double- sided. Size for a double- sided sign is calculated by measuring one sign face.

b. Pole Sign

i. Maximum height is twenty (20) feet. The maximum height to the bottom of the LED panel shall not exceed twelve (12) feet.
ii. The maximum screen size is six (6) feet high by twelve (12) feet wide. iii. The sign support must be at least one-third the width of the sign face.

c. Building-Mounted

i. The sign must be mounted to a vertical surface, such as a building wall or other architectural feature, provided that the top of the sign may not be more than forty-five (45) feet above the ground at the base of the wall.
ii. The sign may not project over the top of the wall on which the sign is placed. iii. Maximum screen size is eight (8) feet high by sixteen (16) feet wide.

d. Hours of Operation

i. Sign operation shall be limited to the hours 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., unless different hours are established as part of the Conditional Use Permit for the sign.

e. Content

i. The City may require that a reasonable amount of display time is provided to the City free of charge to allow the City to provide information to the public about civic events, City public information messages, emergency information, and the like. ii. Electronic Message Signs on City Property are not subject to any prohibition on of f- site signs contained in this Code and may display commercial messages for businesses and activities not located on the site.

f. Conditions of Approval may include dimensional and operational standards which are more stringent than those specified in thi s section if needed to address site- specific conditions.

3 7. Approval Process.

a. All Electronic Message Signs on City Property require a Conditional Use Permit, which shall be reviewed and approved per Section 17.40.040 of this Zoning Code. An application for a Conditional Use Permit for an Electronic Message Signs on City Property may be denied if the City, in light of evidence in the record, determines that the proposed sign is not appropriate for the proposed location.

b. All Electronic Message Signs on City property require site plan and architectural review approval by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee, per Section 17.40.020 of this Zoning Code.

SECTION 2. Lodi Municipal Code Title 17 – Development Code Section 17.34.060.C.b.3, “GC and Industrial Districts,” shall be amended to read as follows:

3. GC and Industrial Districts. Each sign within the GC and industrial zoning districts shall comply with the following standards:

a. Size and Types of Signs Allowed. All signs located on parcels in the GC or any industrial zoning district shall meet the following requirements:

i. The total allowed sign area for all signs on a parcel, including building- mounted and freestanding signs, shall be equal to one square foot of sign area per linear foot of all street frontages on adjacent public or private streets.

4 Example: A corner parcel with two frontages of 200 linear feet each would be allowed a total of 400 square feet of signage:

200 frontage + 200 frontage = 400 square feet of sign area

For parcels with a “flag lot” configuration, frontage shall be measured based on the width of the lot us ed for setback measurement per S ection 17.14.060.C.1.b of this Code.

ii. The total allowed sign area may be divided among building-mounted and freestanding signs, provided that the size standards in this section are not exceeded.

Example: A parcel with a total of 400 square feet of sign area could have one 84-square-foot monument sign and 316 square feet of building-mounted signs:
400 square feet of total sign area - 84 square-foot monument sign = 316 square feet of building mounted signs (400 - 84 = 316)
-OR-
400 square feet of total sign area can be used entirely for 400 square feet of building-mounted signs

iii. The sign area for building -mounted signage in a building containing multiple tenant spaces shall be apportioned based on the building frontage of each space, measured at the front entrance to each space, as shown in the example below.

Example: In the example illustrated above, and assuming that 400 square feet of sign area was to be used for building-mounted signs, each space would be assigned sign area as follows:

50% of building frontage = 50% of 400 SF = 200 square feet of building sign 30% of building frontage = 30% of 400 Sf = 120 square feet of building sign 30% of building frontage = 20% of 400 SF = 80 square feet of building sign

5 iv. Building-mounted signs for each tenant may be placed on all exterior walls which enclose the tenant’s space. For a single-tenant building, this will be all exterior walls.

Tenants in a multi-tenant building are limited to placing signs on their exterior walls.

v. No individual building-mounted sign shall exceed 480 square feet in size.

vi. Each parcel is permitted to have one freestanding monument sign, subject to the following:

(A) The area of the freestanding sign shall be counted toward the maximum sign area for the parcel.
(B) The sign may identify all businesses on the parcel. (C) If multiple tenants are shown on the sign, the area per tenant may be assigned as desired by the owner of the sign. It is not required that individual tenants be shown on a freestanding sign.
(D) The sign shall not contain an electronic reader board. (E) The sign may be externally illuminated or may have backlit letters mounted on an opaque background. Internally illuminated freestanding signs are prohibited. (F) Maximum area for the freestanding sign shall be calculated as the gross square footage of the parcel divided by 2,178, up to a maximum sign size of 300 square feet. Example:

43,560 square foot parcel: 43,560/2,178 = 20 square feet

871,200 square foot parcel (20 acres): 871,200/2,178 = 400 square feet, but limited to maximum of 300 square feet

b. Off-premises Signs. Off- premises signs are prohibited, with the exception of those that legally existed prior to the adoption of this development code.

c. Setback Requirements. Each sign shall be set back at least two feet from the property line. d. Height Limit. No sign shall exceed the following height limits, as applicable. i. Building-mounted Signs. A building-mounted sign shall not exceed the height limit of the building or thirty-five feet, whichever is less.
ii. Freestanding Signs. A freestanding sign shall not exceed the height of the tallest building on the site.
iii. Freeway Information Area.
(A) A freeway information (FI) area is established to include an area bounded: on the west by a line drawn fifty feet west of the west right-of-way line or Cherokee Lane or five hundred feet west of the west right -of-way line of the U.S. Highway 50- 99 freeway, whichever is greater; and on the east by a line drawn five hundred feet east of the east right -of-way line of the U.S. Highway 50- 99 freeway; and on the north and south by the then-current city limits.
(B) A sign within the FI area shall not exceed a height of seventy-five feet.

SECTION 3. No Conflict. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist.

6 SECTION 4. No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to , and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner which imposes upon the City, or any officer or employee thereof, a mandatory duty of care toward persons or property within the City or outside of the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

SECTION 6. Effective Date and Public ation. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. In lieu of publication of the full text of the Ordinance within fifteen (15) days after its passage, a summary of the Ordinance may be published at least five (5) days prior to and fifteen (15) days after adoption by the City Council, and a certified copy shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk pursuant to Government Code section 36933(c)(1).

Approved this 20th day of July, 2022

___________________________________

MARK CHANDLER
Attest: Mayor

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk
========================================================================

State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.

I, Olivia Nashed, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2003 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held June 15, 2022, and was thereafter passed, adopted, and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held July 20, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

I further certify that Ordinance No. 2003 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law.

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:

JANICE D. MAGDICH
City Attorney