Lomita City Council
July 18, 2023

Project Understanding
The goal of the project is to collect and review all significant data to complete a targeted Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan, focusing on primary sewer collection pipelines that serve large tributary basins and areas of new development, including three corridors along Lomita Blvd, Narbonne Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. The Project will develop a sewer hydraulic model for select basins and a capital improvement program (CIP). The estimated duration to complete the Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan is eight (6) months.

To complete this work effort, Psomas proposes the tasks detailed in the following Scope of Work. Our hands-on project management approach, consistent and proactive communication, and established QA/QC procedures will deliver the project on time and within budget.

Project Tasks
Task 1 – General Administration, Meetings, and Presentations Our project manager, Mike Swan, will be the point of contact for the work effort and coordinate all communication with City staff. Psomas will collaborate with City staff through regular progress meetings, Technical Memoranda, and workshops. Psomas will submit monthly progress reports with each invoice. Progress reports will contain work performed, project concerns and impacts, the work remaining, and the work anticipated for the next month.

Project meetings will include the preparation of the agenda, meeting attendance, and meeting minutes for kick-off and up to 6 additional monthly status meetings and progress workshops. Workshops will be held to review milestones and receive City input for scope items, flow monitoring locations and procedures; flow monitoring results and model calibration; capacity evaluation of the existing sewer collection system; and recommended capital improvement projects.

Meeting agendas will be submitted to the City for review two (2) working days prior to each scheduled meeting and workshop. Minutes will be distributed within five (5) working days and include decisions made and action items for all parties.

Task 2 – Review Existing Documents, Data, and Information Psomas will collect and review all pertinent data obtained from the City, Los Angeles County Public Works, and the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance Division (CSMD) to be used in the preparation of the 2023 Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan. Useful information will include as available, as-built and other sewer plans; CCTV and condition reports; the latest CSMD Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP); site-specific sewer studies and other planning documents; sewer infrastructure data; flow metering records; GIS data; CAD mapping; current operations and maintenance practices; and information collected from communication with City and CSMD staff. Psomas will provide City staff with a Request for Information in Excel format at project kick-off where key staff and due dates will be assigned.

Psomas has conducted an initial review of the City’s sewer infrastructure data and understands the system layout and sewer basins. This review was based on GIS data provided by Los Angeles County Public Works that include pipeline alignment, diameter, and material. Invert elevation and related pipeline slope data is not included in the GIS. As-built plans were also reviewed as available through the LA County Public Works Land Records Information website. Through our initial research and evaluation, it was determined that plans are available for the majority of City’s sewer system. This review found pdf plans for more than 80 percent of the City’s sewer pipelines by length available through the County’s online data. A more thorough review, as part of this project, will likely identify and locate additional plans. Psomas will build on the City’s exiting sewer GIS data, as needed, with data from these as-built plans.

Deliverables:

Request for Information in Excel format to be updated by Psomas as information is received and distributed to the project team.

Assumptions:

City staff will provide requested information, as available, within the scheduled timeframe as determined at project kickoff.

City of Lomita Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan
Scope of Work

Task 3 – Existing Sewer Condition Assessment
Review CCTV Inspections and Pipeline Condition Assessment Maira Salcedo, Condition Assessment Lead Engineer, and Benjamin Halbach, Project Engineer, who are both certified by NASSCO under the PACP and MACP programs, will perform a detailed pipeline assessment for strategically identified CCTV-inspected sewer pipe segments assumed to be available from CSMD. Upon initial review of the sewer collection system, we recommend conducting a condition assessment of the 10-inch V.C.P. aligned outside of roadways and through developed properties from Pacific Coast Highway to Ebony Lane (between and parallel to Western Avenue and Walnut Street). This pipeline has a large tributary area and the sewer plans (C.I. No. 1003) are dated 1934. Upon review, Psomas will provide a recommended rehabilitation method along with a justification/rationale for each sewer segment.

The recommendations may consist of complete pipeline and manhole replacement in the same trench; excavation, and performance of point repairs; lining sewer segments in between existing manholes; lining sewer sections; or a combination of methods. Rehabilitation methods will place priority on trenchless repairs to minimize excavation and impacts on the community.

The Master Plan will include the finalized rehabilitation recommendations and exhibits to provide a general visual representation of the recommended repairs .

Task 4 – Develop Flow Monitoring Program, Conduct Field Verification, and Data Collection Psomas will review sewer basin tributary areas and land use to determine the appropriate number and locations of proposed flow monitoring sites. As part of the preparation of this proposal, Psomas has already identified the various sewer basins within the City through review of the system GIS (exhibit shown on the following page). Psomas will coordinate with the City to identify pipelines that are most likely to be capacity deficient based on slope, diameter, tributary area, and communication with field staff. Flow monitoring would be tailored to collect flow data for these identified basins.

Psomas will select preliminary flow monitoring locations that will be finalized through coordination with City staff and ADS Environmental, the subconsultant teaming with Psomas to perform the flow monitoring. Recommended flow monitoring locations, duration, and analysis will be discussed with City staff in a workshop meeting, and then finalized prior to directing ADS to install the flow monitoring equipment.

ADS utilizes the best available technologies to ensure accurate data collection. The proposed flow monitoring plan includes collecting flow data at three (3) sites simultaneously for a period of 14 days. ADS will obtain encroachment permits (assumed to be a no-fee permit), install flow monitoring equipment, and provide raw data and a flow monitoring report.

Deliverables:

ADS Flow Monitoring Report in PDF format with tables, hydrographs, and scattergraphs.

Flow monitoring data in electronic format.

Workshop meeting with City staff to discuss and agree upon Flow Monitoring Plan.

Assumptions:

Flow monitoring does not include wet weather flow analysis. If a significant wet weather event were to be captured during flow monitoring, the costs and benefits of wet weather modeling would be discussed with the City and may be included as an add service.

Any encroachment permit required by the City will be assumed to be issued at no fee since this is a City project. If a fee is required, this can be added to the fee.

City of Lomita Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan
Scope of Work

Task 5 – Develop GIS-based Sewer Model of Select Sewer Basins Model Construction
Psomas will coordinate with the City to identify pipelines that are most likely to be capacity deficient based on slope, diameter, tributary area, current and proposed land use, and communication with field staff. These pipelines, and related tributary flows, will be included in a GIS-based hydraulic sewer model. Psomas will update the existing GIS data for modeled pipelines based on plan research, specifically, including pipeline slope (based on upstream and downstream invert elevations and pipeline length). Pipeline diameter, material, and length are already included in the GIS. The updates will utilize data available from the County in PDF format.

Data gaps and inconsistencies will be identified and reviewed against plans and through discussion with City staff. There are typically survey datum inconsistencies when elevations are taken from plans that span across decades, as is the case in the City’s system. The model development process will not attempt to resolve these discrepancies but rather fix the most downstream invert elevation for each sewer basin and develop upstream invert elevations using pipeline slope data from sewer plans. This method will allow for pipeline capacity evaluation without the need for field survey.

Model Calibration
Psomas will calibrate the hydraulic model to flow monitoring data collected as part of this Scope of Work. Collected flow data will be evaluated for both average flow and diurnal peaking. Psomas will obtain and review existing land use data in GIS within the City’s service area from local municipalities and/or through assessor parcel data available to Psomas online. The land uses within the tributary basins of each flow monitoring station will be compiled along with land use statistics such as acreage and residential density. Initial flow factors by land use type will be developed based on typical industry standards and planning criteria. The land use parcel data will be geocoded to an adjacent loading manhole within the hydraulic model and the resulting modeled flow will be compared to measured flow monitoring data. Flow into the City’s sewer collection system from areas located outside of the City will be included and loaded in the model at the most upstream City manhole.

Psomas will develop calibrated flow factors on an iterative basis, and within typically accepted sewer generation rates, to calibrate to the observed sewer flow data. The average flow factors established by land use type will be used within the model, including the areas that were not flow monitored. Peaking curves will also be generated for residential and nonresidential land uses to calibrate to the observed diurnal flows. Results will be discussed with City staff in a workshop meeting and adjustments made, as necessary.

Build-Out Projections
Psomas will collect available planning documents and collaborate with City staff to develop population projections and annual growth forecasts to be consistent with long-range planning. Psomas will compile and review future County and City Land Use Map data, General Plan, active and current Specific Plans and Development Agreements, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, and other pertinent data to develop population projections and buildout land use conditions.

The buildout scenario will be incorporated into the hydraulic model by including flows to account for the projected growth, development, and infill. Our understanding is that the near future new development will be primarily along three corridors, which is where we will focus our system capacity analysis. These corridors are along Lomita Blvd., Narbonne Avenue, and PCH.

As part of the model calibration, discussed above, Psomas will analyze observed sewer system flows and develop sewage flow factors based on the tributary land use data. Psomas will review and evaluate current City and County design criteria and flow factors used in sizing future facilities. Based on this information, design factors and peaking ratios will be developed for future planning along with design criteria. Projected flows used in the sewer system analysis will be correlated to population and land use projections and used to evaluate system capacity and deficiencies under buildout conditions. Buildout conditions, sewer flow factors, and design criteria will be reviewed with City staff at a workshop meeting.

Deliverables:

Model Development Technical Memorandum
City of Lomita Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan
Scope of Work

Workshop meeting with City Staff on model development and calibration.

Assumptions:

City staff will aid in providing available data on development and growth forecasts consistent with long-range planning.

City staff will aid in coordination with the County to obtain projected land use, specific plans, development agreements, and other data for buildout conditions.

Task 7 – Sewer System Capacity Evaluation and Recommendations Psomas recommends hydraulic modeling to evaluate the capacity of the sewer system under both existing and projected buildout conditions. Once developed, the model will become a useful planning tool for the City, not only in this master planning effort, but in years to come. Though this analysis includes a limited number of basins, the model may be expanded in the future to include additional pipelines and basins.

Psomas will utilize the newly developed and calibrated hydraulic model to evaluate the capacity and operation of the modeled sewer system facilities under both existing and buildout conditions. System deficiencies will be identified based on peak flow conditions and developed capacity criteria. If the most upstream reach of a modeled basin is found to be deficient, the model will be extended upstream to identify the extent of deficient pipelines.

The hydraulic model will then be used to size future facilities and develop recommended improvements to meet the needs of buildout conditions. Improvements will be prioritized based on a combination of capacity constraints as well as age and condition. Capacity improvements will first be prioritized to meet existing deficiencies and then buildout deficiencies based on anticipated phased development.

Alternative solutions such as diversions to existing trunk sewers or new connections to the Los Angeles County Sanitation District system will be developed, where appropriate, to correct system deficiencies along with a strategically phased improvement plan to enhance the reliability of the City’s sewer system. Prioritized improvements will be documented in a Phased Capital Improvement Plan Technical Memorandum and reviewed with the City at a workshop meeting.

An initial review of the City’s sewer system indicate areas of focus would include 8-inch pipelines along Eshelman Avenue, Oak Street, Cypress Street, and Pennsylvania Avenue due to the large sewer basins tributary to these systems. Another area of focus is the 10-inch V.C.P. aligned outside of roadways and through developed properties from Pacific Coast Highway to Ebony Lane (between and parallel to Western Avenue and Walnut Street).

Deliverables:

Phased Capital Improvement Plan Technical Memorandum.

Workshop meeting with City Staff on sewer capacity evaluation and recommendations.

Task 8 – Sewer System Master Plan Documentation
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The combined analysis of system capacity and condition assessment will be used to develop a prioritized CIP for sewer system infrastructure improvements. A CIP schedule will be developed to prioritize improvements in a 10-year plan through 2033. The CIP will include tables with properly designated names/descriptions, specific locations/facilities, schedule, and estimated costs. For financial planning, the cost estimates will include construction, engineering, and other technical services, contract administration, permitting, and construction management. Any additional improvements, beyond 10 years, will be developed for a build-out condition.

Psomas will coordinate with the City to provide all information necessary to incorporate into the City’s separate Sewer Impact Fee Study.

City of Lomita Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan
Scope of Work

Sewer System Master Plan Report
Psomas will provide a complete package of the 2023 Sewer System Master Plan Report including the executive summary, tables, and exhibits for approval and adoption. Psomas will prepare an outline of the Master Plan report for review and input from City staff. Report submittals will include a draft, final draft, and final report to the City. Draft submittals will include Microsoft Word, Excel, and PDF format files. The final report will be provided in PDF format with Microsoft Word and Excel files also provided to the City for their use. The report will include the finalized Technical Memorandum for each milestone. The report will be approved, signed, and stamped by a licensed Civil Engineer.

Deliverables:

Draft, Final Draft, and Final 2023 Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan Report in MS Word, Excel, and PDF format files.

Microsoft Excel files for all data and report tables.

Report graphics in PDF and CAD or GIS format.

Workshop meeting with City on Comprehensive CIP and Master Plan Document.

Final calibrated sewer Model files with scenarios for existing, buildout, and CIP conditions.

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community NOTE: The pipelines drawn in a thicker line weight have been initially identified to include in
the hydraulic model for capacity analysis. Final
selections will be made based in discussion with
City staff and projected areas of development. Pennsylvania Ave. Cypress St. Oak St. Eshelman Ave. PCH to Ebony/Lomita 250th St.

Lomita Blvd.

PCH Narbonne Ave.

Exhibit A
City of Lomita Sewer Basins
Task
No. Task Description
Sr. Proj.

Manager
Sr. Proj.

Engineer
Proj.

Engineer
Design
Engineer Proj. Asst.

Survey
Team
Total
Hours Labor Fee
Subs, Direct
Costs Total Fee
Rates $275 $210 $175 $145 $120 $255
1 General Administration, Meetings, QA/QC 16 20 4 4 4 48 $10,360 $250 $10,610 2 Review Existing Documents, Data, and Information 6 16 8 2 32 $6,410 $6,410 3 Existing Sewer Condition Assessment 3 6 15 1 53 $4,170 $0 $4,170 CCTV Review and Assessment 3 6 15 1 53 $4,170 $0 $4,170 4 Flow Monitoring 2 6 0 1 9 $1,930 $10,000 $11,930
Install Flow Monitors and Obtain Data (3 sites) 2 6 1 9 $1,930 $10,000 $11,930 5 GIS-Based Sewer Model - Select Sewer Basins 26 80 0 104 4 214 $39,510 $0 $39,510

5.1 Develop GIS Model for Key Pipelines/Basins (see Exhibit A) 4 24 40 68 $11,940 $0 $11,940

5.2 Obtain/Review Land Use 4 8 16 28 $5,100 $0 $5,100

5.3 Develop Flow Factors from Land Use and Flow Monitoring 6 16 16 38 $7,330 $0 $7,330

5.4 Geocode Parcels and Load Flow to Manholes 4 8 16 28 $5,100 $0 $5,100

5.5 Flow Factors & Model Calibration 8 24 16 4 52 $10,040 $0 $10,040 6 Sewer System Capacity Evaluation and Recommendations 12 56 64 2 134 $24,580 $0 $24,580

6.1 Identify Existing Hydraulic Deficiencies 4 16 16 36 $6,780 $0 $6,780

6.2 Scenario Modeling for Buildout Condition 2 16 16 34 $6,230 $0 $6,230

6.3 Develop Preliminary System Improvements 4 16 16 2 38 $7,020 $0 $7,020

6.4 Develop Phased CIP 2 8 16 26 $4,550 $0 $4,550
7 Sewer Master Plan Documentation 12 64 46 36 158 $27,730 $100 $27,830

7.1 Prepare Draft Sewer Master Plan Report 8 48 30 16 102 $18,550 $100 $18,650

7.2 Prepare Final Sewer Master Plan Report 4 16 16 20 56 $9,180 $0 $9,180 Project Total 77 242 10 241 50 648 $114,690 $10,350 $125,040 Assumptions:
1 Assume no presentation to City Council or staff to handle 2 No Survey
3 All deliverables PDF and/or GIS files plus Word, Excel, etc. but no hard copies 4 Any printing of MP document or maps by City or extra
5 Flow monitoring is currently estimate
City of Lomita Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan
Fee Estimate

TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kathleen Horn Gregory, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: Confirmation of South Bay Workforce Investment Board Nominee

RECOMMENDATION
Confirm the appointment of the Lomita Chamber of Commerce nominee, Nayeem Khan as the Lomita business representative to the South Bay Workforce Investment Board for a term beginning July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2027.

BACKGROUND
Mr. Gregg McClain, Co-Owner of the Silly Goose Playground previously held the Lomita business private sector seat, however he resigned after closing his business. On June 15, 2023, the Lomita Chamber of Commerce nominated Mr. Nayeem Khan, Sales Manager for Lomita Mail & Print, to serve a four-year term on the SBWIB as a business representative for the City of Lomita.

OPTIONS

1. Make appointment.

2. Give alternative direction.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Letter of recommendation from SBWIB and Chamber
Item No. 7k

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT

Reviewed by: Approved by:

Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:

Kathleen Horn Gregory, MMC
City Clerk

June 15, 2023
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lomita
24300 Narbonne Ave
Lomita, CA 90717
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:

On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Lomita Chamber of Commerce, please accepts the nomination of the following individual to be appointed to serve on the South Bay Workforce Investment Board as a representative of the business private sector in Lomita:

Mr. Nayeem Khan, Sales Manager for Lomita Mail & Print to serve a 4-year term of office from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2027.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Heidi
Heidi Butzine
President/CEO | (424) 378-7111 ext. 202
[email protected]
1 TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Lina Hernandez, Senior Management Analyst
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Kiley & Associates for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a First Amendment to the agreement with Kiley and Associates and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

BACKGROUND
On April 19, 2022, the City Council approved a one-year agreement with Kiley and Associates to provide Federal Legislative Advocacy Services. The initial term of the agreement was for a one-year period ending on June 30, 2023, with the City maintaining the ability to terminate the agreement with 30 days’ notice.

With the changes in the leadership in Washington, DC, many public entities are engaging with lobbyist firms to provide federal legislative advocacy services in order to assist such public entities to apply for grants and other discretionary funding as well as provide services to advance the entity’s legislative priorities. Lomita has had recent success in obtaining grants and funds at the local and state level. However, there are several City priorities that would benefit from continued assistance of a federal lobbyist to advocate for the city.

Kiley & Associates was founded in 2009 and has a seasoned team of professionals with decades of presence in Washington. They provide legislative advocacy services for cities, states, and communities and have strong California connections and extensive experience in representing government entities, including cities in Southern California such as the cities of South Gate and Lynwood and Carson. Kiley & Associates also has a good understanding of the Lomita Community and the South Bay region and has recently been assisting the city to facilitate discussions regarding the Navy Fields and multiple other federal funding opportunities.

Item No. 7l

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 The attached amendment, if approved by the City Council, would extend the term with Kiley and Associates for three years to June 30, 2026, retroactively from July 1, 2023, and allows for a one year option in the 4th year. The amendment maintains the existing rates with no changes.

OPTIONS

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

2. Provide alternative direction.

FISCAL IMPACT
City staff previously negotiated a reduced monthly retainer for the services provided under the original agreement for a total amount not to exceed $40,000 annually for the term of the three-year contract. This amendment makes no changes to this rate and extends the term.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft First Amendment to the Agreement with Kiley and Associates

2. Agreement 2022-17 with Kiley and Associates
Reviewed by: Approved by:

Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:
________________________________
Lina Hernandez
Senior Management Analyst
First Amendment to Agreement between
Kiley and Associates and the City of Lomita
for Legislative Representation
This First Amendment to the Agreement is made and entered into between the City of Lomita (“City”) and Kiley and Associates (“Consultant”). The City and Contractor mutually agree to amend the existing Agreement entered into on April 19, 2022, as follows:

RECITALS
A. On April 19, 2022, the City entered into an Agreement with Consultant for legislative representation (“Agreement”) through June 30, 2023.

B. The City and Contractor now desire to amend the Agreement and extend the term until June 30, 2026, at the same rates as defined in the current Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 7 – Term of Agreement. This section is amended to read as follows:

The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on June 30, 2026, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or extended in writing in advance by both parties.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the City’s sole discretion, and upon approval by the City Manager, this Agreement may be extended for an additional term of 1 year, subject to appropriation of funding by the City Council.

2. All terms, conditions, and other provisions of the Agreement, including all exhibits, not affected by this First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

3. The parties agree that this First Amendment will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment on the 18th day of July 2023, at Lomita, California.

City of Lomita Kiley and Asssociates
By______________________________ By _______________________________ Ryan Smoot, City Manager Gregory T. Kiley, President
Attest: Approved as to Form:
________________________________ _________________________________ Kathleen Horn Gregory, MMC, City Clerk Trevor Rusin, City Attorney Attachment No. 1
Attachment No. 2

1 TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Carla Dillon, P.E., Director of Public Works MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: Bus Loading Zone on Eshelman Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:

Establish a bus loading zone from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. on school days on the east side of Eshelman Avenue between a point 65 feet and a point 125 feet south of 255th Street and between a point 150 feet and a point 305 feet south of 255th Street; post bus loading signage; and install 30 feet of red curb on the east side of Eshelman Avenue, at its intersection with 255th Street as shown on attached drawings.

BACKGROUND:

Staff received requests from Fleming Middle School staff and City Parking Enforcement to modify the signage and curb markings on the east side Eshelman Avenue from 254th Street to 257th Street to support the bus loading safety of the school. City staff has previously worked with Fleming Middle School staff to improve the bus loading and traffic on Walnut Street. Three to four buses drop off and pick up students in these locations along Eshelman Avenue and since this is not clearly marked bus loading, there are often cars parked along the curb causing the buses to extend into the driving lanes. In addition, school staff have placed traffic delineators to prevent cars from taking these spaces. The full report from Lomita’s Traffic Advisor follows.

Staff from the City, LA County Sheriff Department, LA County of Public Works Traffic Advisor, and Fleming met on site during bus loading to observe. Based upon the conditions including student path of travel and number of buses, LA County Public Works recommended the segments totaling 205 feet of bus loading zone. The 30 feet of red curb was recommended near the intersection and cross walk as drivers had been observed parking in the intersection and backing up into the cross walk. This red curb will also provide additional protection for pedestrians.

Item No. 7m

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 The Public Safety and Traffic Commission reviewed this item on June 21, 2023, and recommends approval by the City Council. Fleming Middle School staff and St. Margaret Mary Church were informed of the proposed changes.

FISCAL IMPACT
Minimal to implement signage and curb paint changes by City staff.

OPTIONS

1. Approve recommendations.

2. Request staff consider alternate solutions.

ATTACHMENT

1. LA County (Traffic Advisor) Memos
Reviewed by: Approved by:

Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:

Carla Dillon, PE
Public Works Director
June 8, 2023
TO: Carla Dillon
City of Lomita
FROM: Sharad Robertson
Los Angeles County Public Works

REQUEST FOR SCHOOL BUS LOADING ZONE ON ESHELMAN AVENUE
BETWEEN 254TH STREET AND 257TH STREET

BACKGROUND
The City of Lomita received concerns regarding parking of school buses along Eshelman Avenue between 254th Street and 257th Street. The City would like to investigate if a school bus loading zone could help to mitigate the parking concerns along Eshelman Avenue between the subject limits.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Eshelman Avenue is classified as a Minor Arterial roadway per the Federal Highway Administration California Road System maps. Eshelman Avenue runs in the north-south direction and is 60 feet wide. It is improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk along both sides of the roadway. There is one travel and one bicycle lane in each direction, separated by a two-way left turn lane. Parking is allowed along both sides of the roadway, except during street sweeping hours. Fronting developments consist of single-family residential homes, a church, and school grounds along the west side of the roadway. Alexander Fleming Middle School’s grounds front the east side of the roadway. The posted speed limit on Eshelman Avenue is 30 miles per hour (mph).

DISCUSSION
A review of the collision history on file with the Lomita Sheriff for the 5-year period ending January 31, 2023, revealed no midblock collisions along Eshelman Avenue between 254th Street and 257th Street.

A field review conducted on May 16, 2023, revealed that the existing signs and pavement markings were visible and unobstructed. Additionally, it was noted that there are existing school crosswalks at the intersections of Eshelman Avenue and 254th Street; and Eshelman Avenue and 255th Street. Furthermore, there is an existing white curb loading zone on the east side of Eshelman Avenue, between a point 74 feet and a point 164 feet south of 254th Street. Curbs are intermittently painted red along both sides of the roadway. It was noted that motorists were parked along both sides of the roadway, and that school buses were parked on the east side of Eshelman Avenue, south of 255th Street.

Attachment No. 1

RECOMMENDATION
We recommend the following:
• Adopt a traffic regulation order establishing a school bus loading zone from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m., and from 12:30 p.m. to 3 p.m., school days only, on the east side of Eshelman Avenue between a point 65 feet and point 125 feet south of 255th Street; and between a point 150 feet and a point 305 feet south of 255th Street • Install school bus loading signs as shown on attached sketch • Install 30 feet of red curb on the east side of Eshelman Avenue, at its intersection with 255th Street as shown on attached sketch

LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY MOBILITY DIVISION

PHOTOGRAPHIC VISUAL FILE
Bus Loading Zone Request on Eshelman Avenue (City of Lomita) PHOTOS BY: SR Date Taken: May 16, 2023

1 Eshelman Avenue, north of 255th Street, facing southwest 2 Eshelman Avenue at 255th Street facing southwest

LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY MOBILITY DIVISION

PHOTOGRAPHIC VISUAL FILE
Bus Loading Zone Request on Eshelman Avenue (City of Lomita) PHOTOS BY: SR Date Taken: May 16, 2023

3 Eshelman Avenue at 255th Street facing west
4 Eshelman Avenue, south of 255th Street, facing northwest

LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY MOBILITY DIVISION

PHOTOGRAPHIC VISUAL FILE
Bus Loading Zone Request on Eshelman Avenue (City of Lomita) PHOTOS BY: SR Date Taken: May 16, 2023

5 Eshelman Avenue, south of 255th Street, facing northwest 6 Eshelman Avenue, south of 255th Street, facing south
Los Angeles County Public Works
Traffic Collision History Report
Midblock Collisions
5/17/2023
Arterial: ESHELMAN AVENUE
Limit 1: 254TH STREET
Limit 2: 257TH STREET
Date Range Reported: 02/01/2018 - 01/31/2023
Total Number of Collisions: 0
Total Number of Persons Injured: 0
Total Number of Persons Severely Injured:: 0
Total Number of Persons Killed: 0
Map data ©2023 100 m
Seq.

No.

Date Time Location Dist. Dir.

Collision
Pattern
Motor Veh
Involved With
Dir. of
Travel 1
Movement
Prec. Coll. 1
Dir. of
Travel 2
Movement
Prec. Coll. 2
PCF Inj Severe Kill
No records to display.

CALIFORNIA ROAD SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
1 TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Carla Dillon, P.E., Director of Public Works MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering for the Design of Water Main Replacements in Zone G

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering for engineering design services for water main replacements in Zone G in the amount of $175,755 plus a 15% contingency amount of $26,363; reappropriate $1,156,000 from FY22-23 to FY23- 24; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

BACKGROUND:

The Zone G Water Main Replacement Project was included as part of the City of Lomita CIP Master Plan 2022-2027 and in the FY22-24 budget under the descriptions ‘Annual Aged Pipeline R&R’ and ‘Pipeline Replacement – Other.’ Three pipeline segments were selected for replacement including 247th Place from Walnut Street east to the portion being replaced in the 247th Area Project, Walnut Street from Lomita Boulevard to 253rd Street and Ebony Lane from Lomita Boulevard to 253rd Street.

The existing 4-inch, 6-inch and 8-inch diameter water mains which were constructed in 1928 have exceeded their useful life and need to be replaced. These locations were selected as the Zone G Street Improvement Project is scheduled to begin in the Spring of 2024, and it is desirable to replace these aged pipes prior to street resurfacing/reconstruction.

This project consists of constructing approximately 5,000 linear feet of PVC water pipeline on three streets. This project will also include installation of fire hydrants, service laterals, valves, blow-offs, air release valves, and other associated water appurtenances (valves, services, and fittings).

The City requested proposals for this work by advertising on the City’s website and Item No. 7n

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 sending it directly to multiple firms. The City received six proposals and interviewed the top firms. The City selected Onward Engineering as the most qualified having performed similar projects for Cities of La Habra, Sierra Madre, as well as for Cal Water. In addition, Onward Engineering has provided similar service for the City of Lomita for the 247th Area Project and has been pleased with the quality of their work.

FISCAL IMPACT
The following has been budgeted for this work:

Account FY22-23 FY23-24
Annual Aged Pipeline R&R 520-840-5821.372 $1,156,000
Pipeline Replacement – Other 520-840-5821.375 $250,000
Reappropriation of funds from FY22-23 to FY23-24 is necessary for this work to proceed.

OPTIONS

1. Approve recommendations.

2. Request staff consider alternate solutions.

ATTACHMENT

1. Professional Services Agreement
Reviewed by: Approved by:

Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:

Carla Dillon, PE
Public Works Director

CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF LOMITA AND ONWARD ENGINEERING

This AGREEMENT for Design Services for Water Main Replacement is entered into this 18th day of July 2023, by and between the CITY OF LOMITA, a general law city and municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Onward Engineering.

R E C I T A L S
A. CITY does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement.

B. Therefore, CITY desires to contract out for Design Services for Water Main Replacement.

C. CONTRACTOR warrants to CITY that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement.

D. CITY desires to contract with CONTRACTOR to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:

1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION.

A. As partial consideration, CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as Exhibit A;
B. As an additional consideration, CONTRACTOR and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.

C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR an amount of $175,755.00, the CONTRACTOR’s estimated costs of its services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. The City Council has also approved an additional 15% of these estimated costs, or up to $26,363.00, for unexpected contingencies, or a total, not-to-exceed amount of $202,118.00. If CONTRACTOR incurs expenses exceeding its estimated costs of $175,755.00, the CONTRACTOR must request such expenses in writing, and the CITY’s City Manager or his designee must approve of such requests, for CONTRACTOR to receive compensation for those costs.

D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless

first approved by the City Manager or his designee.

E. CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its bill for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR all uncontested amounts set forth in the CONTRACTOR'S bill within 30 days after it is received.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

A. CONTRACTOR will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICES attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.

If any part of Exhibit A is inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONTRACTOR will, in a professional manner, furnish all the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONTRACTOR by this Agreement.

3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONTRACTOR as specified by this Agreement, CONTRACTOR must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period.

4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by CITY.

5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that CONTRACTOR has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.

6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONTRACTOR’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is Majdi Ataya. CONTRACTOR shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of CITY.

7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on December 31, 2028, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 13 of this Agreement or extended in writing in advance by both parties.

8. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TRAINING. The contractor shall implement and maintain activity specific Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent pollutant loading from stormwater and non-stormwater discharges to receiving waters as required in Municipal NPDES Permit No. CAS004004. Contracting staff whose primary job duties are related to implementation of BMPs shall be adequately trained to effectively implement, operate, and maintain such BMPs and must be versed in factors affecting BMP effectiveness. The contractor shall certify they have received all applicable training to implement the requirements in Municipal NPDES Permit No.

CAS004004 and shall provide documentation to that effect.

9. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum, and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONTRACTOR and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with the written agreement between the parties.

10. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONTRACTOR will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number.

11. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required by local, state, and federal laws in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement, including a business license as specified in Title VI, Chapter 2 of the Lomita Municipal Code.

12. LAWS AND REGULATIONS; EMPLOYEE/LABOR CERTIFICATION.

CONTRACTOR shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. CONTRACTOR shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Services and this Agreement. All violations of such laws and regulations shall be grounds for CITY to terminate the Agreement for cause.

13. PREVAILING WAGE.

A. Prevailing Wage. CONTRACTOR is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONTRACTOR agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.

Upon request, CITY shall provide CONTRACTOR with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available

to interested parties upon request and shall post copies at the CONTRACTOR’S principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and CONTRACTOR shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law.

CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

B. Registration/DIR Compliance. If the services are being performed on a public works project of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). CONTRACTOR shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subcontractors. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be CONTRACTOR’S sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractors that affect CONTRACTOR’S performance of services, including any delay, shall be CONTRACTOR’S sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered CONTRACTOR caused delay and shall not be compensable by CITY.

CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor.

C. Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, CONTRACTOR certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

D. Employment of Apprentices. CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors shall comply with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.

E. CONTRACTOR or subcontractors may not perform work on a public works project with a subcontractor who is ineligible to perform work on a public project pursuant to Labor Code section 1777.1 or 1777.7. Any contract on a public works project entered into between the CONTRACTOR and a debarred subcontractor is void as a matter of law. A debarred subcontractor may not receive any public money for performing work as a subcontractor on a public works contract. Any public money

that is paid or may have been paid to a debarred subcontractor by CONTRACTOR on the project shall be returned to CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred subcontractor who has been allowed to work on the Project.

F. CONTRACTOR agrees to bind every subcontractor to the terms of the Agreement as far as such terms are applicable to subcontractor’s portion of the work.

CONTRACTOR shall be as fully responsible to CITY for the acts and omissions of its subcontractor and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by its subcontractor, as CONTRACTOR is for acts and omissions of persons directly employed by CONTRACTOR. Nothing contained in these Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor and CITY.

14. TERMINATION.

A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing.

B. CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date.

C. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONTRACTOR shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONTRACTOR will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination.

D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated.

15. INDEMNIFICATION.

A. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONTRACTOR's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONTRACTOR’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation.

CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State

of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.

B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONTRACTOR as required by Section 19, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification.

16. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONTRACTOR’s professional services.

CONTRACTOR’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.

17. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree that THE CONTRACTOR will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. THE CONTRACTOR will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employees while under contract with CITY. CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONTRACTOR as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONTRACTOR will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only.

18. AUDIT OF RECORDS.

A. THE CONTRACTOR agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement.

B. CONTRACTOR will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.

19. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONTRACTOR will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by CITY to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONTRACTOR to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement.

20. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.

A. CONTRACTOR, at CONTRACTOR’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies:

1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. CONTRACTOR shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by CONTRACTOR for CITY.

2. General Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.

3. Automobile Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.

4. Professional Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from CONTRACTOR’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by CONTRACTOR or by its employees, subcontractors, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONTRACTOR will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated.

Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONTRACTOR for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONTRACTOR, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.

B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance

company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by CITY, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise.

1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.”

2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.

Any insurance maintained by CITY, including any self-insured retention CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy.

3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.

4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents.

5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.

6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been received by CITY.

C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement.

CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY. At CITY’s option, CONTRACTOR shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.

E. CONTRACTOR shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.

Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement.

F. Failure on the part of CONTRACTOR to procure or maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 13 above.

G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow CITY, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONTRACTOR (as the named insured) should CONTRACTOR fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONTRACTOR understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONTRACTOR as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should CITY pay the SIR or deductible on CONTRACTOR’S behalf upon CONTRACTOR’S failure or refusal to do so to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, CITY may include such amounts as damages in any action against Contractor for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by CITY due to the breach.

21. USE OF OTHER CONTRACTORS. THE CONTRACTOR must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any Contractors while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed Contractor and the terms of compensation.

22. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONTRACTOR for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONTRACTOR’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of CONTRACTOR, its employees, sub-Contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by CONTRACTOR, its employees, sub-Contractors and agents.

23. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONTRACTOR shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the CITY’S review of CONTRACTOR’S report or plans. Should the CONTRACTOR fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to CONTRACTOR. In addition to all other available remedies, CITY may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by CITY or may withhold

payment otherwise owed CONTRACTOR under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction.

24. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONTRACTOR by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONTRACTOR’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONTRACTOR’S only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:

CITY CONTRACTOR
City of Lomita
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
ATTN: City Manager
Onward Engineering
300 S. Harbor Boulevard,
Suite 814, Anaheim, CA
92805
ATTN: Majid Ataya
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section.

26. SOLICITATION. CONTRACTOR maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONTRACTOR’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONTRACTOR’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONTRACTOR breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.

27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONTRACTOR and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of the CONTRACTOR’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement.

28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County.

29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written.

30. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party.

31. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city administrator, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY.

32. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission, scanned and delivered via electronic mail, or delivered using digital signature technology approved by CITY. Such facsimile or electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

33. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other.

34. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided.

35. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled.

36. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY.

CONTRACTOR represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload,

experience in dealing with private Contractors, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONTRACTOR is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency.

37. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (CITY and CONTRACTOR initials required at one of the following paragraphs)
By their respective initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledge that CONTRACTOR is a “contractor” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because CONTRACTOR’S duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were CONTRACTOR employed by CITY. CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledges his or her assumingoffice, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to the Contractor commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to CONTRACTOR a memorandum detailing the extent of CONTRACTOR’S disclosure obligations in accordance with the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.

City Initials ______
Contractor Initials ______
OR
By their initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledge that CONTRACTOR is not a “contractor” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because CONTRACTOR’S duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of contractor in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.

City Initials ______
Contractor Initials ______
[signatures on following page]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF LOMITA CONTRACTOR
Ryan Smoot, City Manager By: Majdi Ataya, President
ATTEST:
80-0101723
Kathleen Horn Gregory, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Trevor Rusin, City Attorney

CITY OF LOMITA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
FOR

DESIGN SERVICES FOR
ZONE G

WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT

RFP DEADLINE
TUESDAY MAY 30, 2023
AT 1:00 P.M.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION I

GENERAL
INFORMATION..........................................................................................................................................1

SECTION II
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS....................................................................................................................5

SECTION III
SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................................................10

SECTION IV
SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS ..........................................................................................................15 Attachment - A Map of Zone G Water Mains to be replaced.

Attachment - B Link to 2022 Water Master Plan.

Attachment - C Selected pages from the 2012 Water Atlas.

Attachment - D Sample Professional Services Agreement.
1 SECTION I

GENERAL INFORMATION
A. INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
The City of Lomita is requesting proposals from qualified civil engineering firms to prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates (PS&E) design services for Zone G water main replacement.

The City of Lomita is an urban, densely populated 1.97 square miles (total area is 1,261 acres), located at the base of the Palos Verdes Peninsula in the Los Angeles Basin, Los Angeles County. The City of Lomita is located in the southwestern part of Los Angeles County, 26 miles south of downtown Los Angeles and bounded by the City of Torrance on the north and west, the Harbor Region of Los Angeles to the east, and the City of Rolling Hill Estates on the southwest; and the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and unincorporated Los Angeles County area to the southeast. The City is almost completely developed with mostly residential neighborhoods and commercial units.

The City of Lomita owns and operates a water distribution system for the purpose of delivering potable water to its customers within the Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD)’s boundaries.

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Zone G Water Main Replacement Project was included as part of the City of Lomita CIP Master Plan 2022-2027. The project is limited to the northwestern area of the City of Lomita and includes the following streets: Walnut Street, Ebony Lane, and 247th Place.

Refer to Project Map in Attachment A, Phase 1 & 2 on PDF drawing and the Street Reconstruction Project excel sheet.

The existing 4-inch, 6-inch and 8-inch diameter water mains which were constructed in 1928 have exceeded their useful life and will need to be replaced. Please refer to Attachment B, (2022 Water Master Plan) and Attachment C (Pages 38, 43, 47 from the 2012 Water Atlas).

This project consists of constructing approximately 3700 linear feet of PVC water pipeline on various streets. Per the 2022 Water Master Plan, the various proposed water mains are displayed in Attachment B to provide improved flow, pressure, and fire protection. This new water mains will replace the existing 1928 4-inch, 6-inch and 8-inch diameter water mains which will be abandoned in place. This project will also include installation of fire hydrants, service laterals, valves, blow-offs, air release valves, and other associated water appurtenances (valves, services, and fittings).

The construction of this project will consist of furnishing all equipment, labor, skills,
2 materials, and all other items necessary for the completion of the project. The contractor shall perform all work required for such construction in accordance with the Contract Documents and subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract, complete and ready for use.

C. DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The purpose of this RFP is to seek the services of a Civil Engineering Consultant to design the Zone G Water Main Replacement. The prospective consulting firm will prepare Construction Plans, Project Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) subject for review and approval by the City Engineer. Services shall also include professional support during the bidding process of the project as well as support during construction to review submittals and answer Request for Information (RFI).

The contract will be regulated according to the provisions of all State and local laws and ordinances that are applicable. This includes compliance with prevailing wage rates and their payment in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1775.

The contract will be responsible for providing notes on design drawings to stage construction work with Zone G Street Construction Project detailed Attachment A. The notes will include street closures and construction notices to the customers.

D. PROJECT DURATION
The estimated design time is 8 months, which can be subdivided as follows:
• Analysis & Preliminary Design
• PS & E – 60%
• PS & E – 90%
• PS & E – 100%
E. PROJECT FUNDING
The funding of this project is partially provided by the Water Capital Fund.

F. PROJECT SCHEDULE
A tentative schedule is included below. The proposals submitted shall use this schedule as a guide to further define an appropriate work schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Proposed Work Plan in Section III. The final schedule will be negotiated based on the final scope of work and work plan agreed to by the City and the selected consultant.
3 Milestone Date
RFP Release April 21, 2023
Last Day for Questions May 8, 2023, at 1:00 PM
Issue Last Addendum May 15, 2023
Proposal Deadline May 30, 2023, at 1:00 PM
Consultant Interviews June 12, 2023
Expected City Council Approval June 20, 2023
Kick off & Notice to Proceed July 5, 2023
*Dates are estimates
4 SECTION II

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
A. GENERAL
The proposal must be concise, well organized and demonstrate your firm’s team qualifications and experience related to this project. The proposal shall be printed on 8½" x 11" pages and include resumes, past experience, graphs, tables, etc. It must include the following:

I. Cover Letter (one page): The cover letter shall include the name and address of the firm submitting the proposal and a brief introduction of the company and proposed Design Team.

II. Qualification and Experience (maximum of 10 pages): The proposed Engineering Design Team shall have experience working with Public Agencies in similar assignments, including experience in dealing with public agency staff, City Councils, and Commissions. It is highly desirable that the key project team members have served public agencies in various capacities, are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures and policies.

Qualifications and experience to be shown in the proposal shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Project organization chart
• Identification of experience of principal staff members, including major subconsultants. Resumés of principal staff should not exceed one page per person.
• Identify the availability of your team and the percentage of current workload of staff that would be committed to this project, including sub-consultants. • Experience of the firm, the team and subconsultants on similar projects.

III. Scope of Work and Project Approach (maximum 10 pages): The Consultant shall include in its proposal a detailed scope of work and understanding of the process to undertake such a project and complete it in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations, standards, and requirements. Other items to include:
• Description of your firm's quality/control (Q/C) and quality/assurance (Q/A) procedures that will be used for the Project.
• Provide project schedule for various activities by the Engineering Design Team involved and identify the milestones of major tasks of the Project. • Discussion of document control.
5 IV. Consultant shall submit a fee proposal for the Project in a SEPARATE SEALED ENVELOPE marked “Fee Proposal” along with the Project title.

The City will negotiate with the top-ranked consultant in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local guidelines. Fee proposal shall include all tasks required to perform the work with a maximum not-to-exceed fee for each task and a grand total not-to-exceed fee. The fee proposal must contain a task and fee breakdown of all components of cost, including labor base rate, overhead and all other direct and indirect costs. The fee proposal shall clearly show hours and cost per task. The task and fee breakdown must match the scope of services in the format, as presented within the RFP. The Consultant and all sub-consultants shall not be compensated by the City for any time spent on commuting to or from the Project site and other peripheral work not directly performed as a result of this Project. The Consultant shall provide its services for the duration of the Project for the approved scope of work and fees. The proposal must remain valid for at least 90 days from the due date of this RFP.

The City will short list the list of candidates to three consulting firms, of which it will interview and select the top candidate for the project.

V. Prevailing wages will apply if the services involved environmental hazardous materials; sampling, testing, and inspection. California State Prevailing Wage information is available through the California Department of Industrial Relations web site at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/statistics_research.html B. EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS
By submitting a proposal, Consultant represents that it has thoroughly examined and become thoroughly familiar with the work required under this RFP and has the staffing and resources capable of performing quality work to achieve the City’s objectives.

C. ADDENDA
Any changes to the requirements will be made by written addendum to this RFP.

Any written addenda issued pertaining to this RFP shall be incorporated into the terms and conditions of any resulting Agreement. City will not be bound to any modifications to or deviations from the requirements set forth in this RFP as the result of oral instructions. Consultants shall acknowledge receipt of addenda in their proposals.

D. QUESTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Questions relating to this RFP shall be emailed to the Public Works no later than Monday May 8, 2023 at 1:00 PM.
6 E. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
One (1) electronic PDF copy of the proposal shall be emailed to the Public Works Department at: [email protected] with Proposal for Design Services for Zone G Water Main Replacement Project in the email Title.

The Fee Proposals shall be emailed separately to: [email protected] with Fee Proposal for Design Services for Zone G Water Main Replacement Project in the email Title.

F. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The successful Consultant shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, insurance policies as listed in Section 17 - Insurance Requirements of the attached sample Professional Service Agreement (Attachment E).

All insurance policies must be open to inspection by the City and copies of policies must be submitted to the City upon written request.

G. SELECTION CRITERIA
Responses to this RFP will be evaluated using a point rating system, as shown in Section IV. The evaluation will be completed by a selection committee composed of staff from the Public Works Department.

H. CHANGES IN THE RFP
Should any prospective proposer be in doubt as to the true meaning of any portion of this (RFP), or should the proposer find any ambiguity, inconsistency, or omission therein, the Proposer shall make a written request for an official interpretation or correction. Such requests must be received by the Public Works Department not less than five (5) working days prior to the final date of submittal of the proposals.

Such interpretation or correction, as well as any additional RFP provisions that the City may decide to include, will be made only as an official addendum, and will be sent to each firm recorded as having received a copy of the RFP. Any addendum issued by the City shall become part of the RFP and will be incorporated into the proposal.

I. DISCLOSURES
Under the Freedom of Information Act (Public Act 442), the City is obligated to permit review of its files, if requested by others. All information in a submitter’s proposal is subject to disclosure under this provision. This act also provides for a complete 7 disclosure of contracts and attachments thereto.

J. POST-SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
After reviewing and evaluating the proposals that are received, the City will select one or more firms with whom it will negotiate a Professional Services Agreement (PSA).

A sample of the standard PSA is included in Attachment E. Those who wish to submit a proposal to the City are required to carefully review the Professional Services Agreement.

The PSA will include a Scope of Services and Fee Schedule (not-to-exceed amount), both of which may be modified by mutual consent during the negotiation phase. The Insurance Requirements outlined in the PSA may not be revised or changed. Prior to its final execution by the selected firm and the City, the PSA must be submitted to, and approved by, City Council and/or the City Manager.

The City reserves the right to award the total proposal, to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part, and to waive any informality or technical defects if, in the City’s sole judgment, the best interests of the City will be so served.

K. COST LIABILITY
The City of Lomita assumes no responsibility or liability for costs incurred by the Consultant prior to the execution of a PSA. The liability of the City is limited to the terms and conditions outlined in the Agreement.

L. INVOICES
Consultant shall submit invoice(s) at the end of each month for the work performed.

Each invoice at a minimum shall include the following information:

Project name;
Period for which invoice is submitted;
Invoice number;
Task name;
Balance remaining and percent completed for each task;
Total project budget and remaining balance;
Each employee’s name, hours of work, rate, and total charge, Invoices must be accompanied by payroll and any other supporting documents that will be necessary to expedite the review and approval process.

M. GUIDELINES DURING PANDEMICS
Consultants/contractors shall comply with all local, state and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Governor’s and Los Angeles County 8 Health Officer’s orders and guidance related to COVID-19, social distancing, and best practices.

Consultants/Contractors are required to check with the latest guidelines of the Los Angeles County Public Works and the Los Angeles County Public Health for construction sites during the pandemic.

Disclosure: Consultants shall disclose in their responses to any Request for Proposals whether they have been the subject of any legal investigation by County, State, and/or Federal agencies within the past 5 years. If so, each responding consultant shall identify the agency and contact person, the nature of the investigation and any determination over the outcome of said investigation.

Non-compliance with this section shall result in rejection of the Proposal, but a consultant’s disclosure of any such investigation (even one which resulted in a determination that was averse to the consultant) will not automatically result in rejection of the Proposal. The occurrence, nature, underlying facts and outcome of any such investigation are not by themselves determinative but are simply included among many factors that will be considered by the City in evaluating Proposals.
9 SECTION III

SCOPE OF SERVICES

DESCRIPTION
This RFP is to solicit proposals for design services for Zone G Water Main Replacement Project, including replacing valves, fire hydrants, meters, and service lines. The Consultant is to produce 100% Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for the City subject for review and approval.

The following scope of work is a minimum suggested scope of work for the project. The City is seeking a Consultant to provide turnkey comprehensive engineering consulting services which includes but is not limited to preliminary planning and engineering, preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), and bidding and construction support for the aforementioned project.

The consultant can provide additional tasks which they feel is pertinent to or adds value to achieving the City’s overall project objectives.

The following tasks include but are not limited to:

Task 1 – Pre-Design Meeting
• Attend a project kick-off meeting with the City to discuss project goals/objectives, proposed scope of work, schedule, project constraints, and other pertinent issues. Consultant shall prepare a meeting agenda for the City’s review and following the completion of the meeting, document decisions and action items in the meeting minutes.

Task 2 – Analysis and Preliminary Design
• Prepare an overall project schedule indicating each major and minor task including milestones, estimated start and end dates, task duration, task dependencies, and other relevant project information. The schedule shall include and incorporate the City’s review of three weeks per submittal of each project submittal, City Council approvals, the City’s 9/80 work schedule including holidays. The Consultant shall update the schedule as needed or as requested by the City Engineer.
• Conduct thorough comprehensive utility research and field investigations including but not limited to review of existing planning documents (i.e. Water Master Plan), utility maps, water atlas, as-built drawings, and coordination (through Underground Service Alert) for identification and marking of existing utilities throughout the extent of the project which includes the City of Lomita right of way. Consultant shall verify to the extent economically feasible the 10 location, size and depth of these utilities. Given the complex nature of the project, the Consultant shall determine the need for incorporating pothole utility data into the design plans.
• Consultant shall coordinate with any businesses and properties that will be affected by the project design (typical service line connections).

Task 3 – Field Survey (Optional / If-needed)
• Consultant shall determine if a comprehensive topographic survey of the proposed project limits including a survey of the proposed pipeline alignment and surrounding areas is required, and if so, include this scope of work.

Survey shall be performed by a California licensed Land Surveyor to locate pertinent water appurtenances including but not limited to parcel lot boundaries, survey monuments, storm drains/catch basins, manholes, utilities, hydrants, valves, blow-offs, air release valves, meters and meter boxes, curb and gutter, trees, power poles, edge of pavement, street centerlines, sidewalks, driveway approaches, service laterals, and project limits plus a minimum 60 feet beyond the project limits.
• Consultant shall locate all centerline monuments and ties during the design stage. The findings should be incorporated into the contract documents. The City’s requires the construction contract document to re-establish all disturbed monuments.

Task 4 - Engineering Design
Consultant shall prepare a complete set of contract documents incorporating the City’s boilerplate contract documents and other standard forms, along with the full PS&E package.

Task 4.1 – Preliminary Submittal 60% PS&E
• Prepare a 60% design submittal and submit two (2) hard copy prints and a digital copy to the City for review. The 60% submittal shall include at a minimum: all design criteria, preliminary engineer’s cost estimate, preliminary water main profile indicating proposed alignments, and preliminary contract documents.
• Attend a 60% submittal review meeting to review and discuss the City’s comments. Following the meeting, Consultant shall incorporate the City’s comments into the progress plans.
11 Task 4.2 – Pre-Final Submittal 90% PS&E
• Prepare a 90% design submittal and submit two (2) hard copy prints and a digital copy to the City for review. The 90% submittal shall include Contract bidding documents including plans, technical specifications, and an engineer’s estimate.
• The 90% design plans should include pertinent Traffic Control Plans and necessary requirements by the City of Lomita.
• Attending a 90% submittal review meeting to review and discuss the City’s comments. Following the meeting, Consultant shall incorporate the City’s comments into the PS&E.

Task 4.3 –Final Submittal 100% PS&E
• Prepare a final 100% design submittal including final bidding document and submit two (2) hard copy prints and digital copies to the City for review. The 100% submittal shall include Contract bidding documents including plans, technical specifications, and an engineer’s estimate.
• Submit the final 100% submittal package to the City for bidding purposes.

Submit both two (2) hard copies and one electronic file of the 100% submittal package. The final 100% submittal shall include all electronic files including MS Office and AutoCAD files.
• All final plans (including traffic control plans) and specifications must be signed and stamped by a CA licensed professional civil engineer.

Deliverables:

The consultant shall prepare and submit PS&E for City’s review and approval at the following stages of design:
• 60% Plans
• 90% Plans (to include Traffic Control Plans)
• 100% Plans
One (1) digital pdf copy and two (2) hard copies of the plans per percentage completion shall be submitted to the City for review. Upon receipt of final comments from the City, Consultant will prepare 100% Plan and Specifications for City’s final review and approval.

Task 5 – Bidding and Construction Support
The Consultant shall provide professional support during bidding process and construction activities. Consultant shall perform the following, but are not limited, lists of activities:
12 • Attend Pre-bid meeting.
• Consultant shall respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) or Requests for Clarification (RFCs) and prepare the bid addenda as required. • Attend Pre-construction meeting.
• Review construction submittals
• Respond to Request for Information (8 RFIs)
• Assist in cost estimate and analysis for Contract Change Order (4 CCOs) Task 7 – As-built plans
At the completion of construction, the Consultant shall coordinate with the construction management team to obtain a set of plans that are marked-up by the contractor showing exactly what was built and to transfer that information to the City plan library. Provide as built drawing electronic files in PDF and auto-CAD format to the city plan library within 30 days of work completion. 13 SECTION IV

SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS
All proposals will be evaluated by the City of Lomita Selection Committee (Committee).

The Committee may be composed of City of Lomita staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in the services described herein. The Committee will review the submittals and will rank the proposals. The evaluation of the proposals shall be within the sole judgment and discretion of the Committee. All contacts during the evaluation phase shall be through the City of Lomita Project Manager only.

The selection committee will review the submitted proposals according to the below evaluation criteria and weighing factors. The committee will then establish a shortlist based on the highest ranked proposals. If there are enough qualified candidates, the shortlist will include three consultants to be are interviewed.

After the interview, the committee will reestablish a final ranking of the highest ranked consultants. The highest ranked consultant will be selected for the project. Cost proposals for all qualified consultants will be opened and used to begin negotiations, however, with the highest ranked consultant. If an agreement on fees cannot be reached, then negotiations will proceed to the second highest qualified consultant, and so on and so forth until a final agreement is reached with a consultant.

The proposals will be evaluated based on the following:

A. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS - 20 points
Identify individuals who will be assigned to this project by name, titleand their role on this project. Show where these personnel will be physically located during the time they are engaged in the work. Indicate which of these individuals you consider key to the successful completion of the project. Resumes or qualifications are required for proposed project personnel who will be assigned to the project. Qualifications and capabilities of any sub- consultants shall be included.

B. PAST EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS - 30 points
The written proposal must include a list of specific experience in the project area and indicate proven ability in implementing similar projects for the firm and the individuals to be assigned to the project. Experience with publicly owned water or wastewater treatment facilities in a similar capacity is highly desirable. The proposal should also indicate the ability to have projects completed within the budgeted amounts. A complete list of client references must be provided for similar projects completed within the last two years. It shall include the firms/agencies name, address, telephone number, project title, and contact person. 14 C. PROPOSED WORK PLAN – 40 points
A detailed work plan is to be presented which outlines the overall project understanding, approach, and lists all tasks determined to be necessary to accomplish the overall scope of the project. The work plan shall include, but is not be limited to, the objectives/tasks listed in Section II of the RFP. The work plan shall define resources needed for each task (title and labor hours) and staff persons completing the project element tasks. In addition, the work plan shall include a timeline schedule depicting the sequence and duration of tasks showing how the work will be organized and executed.

The work plan shall be sufficiently detailed and clear to identify the progress milestones, i.e. when project elements, measures, and deliverables are to be completed. Additional project elements suggested by the proposer that are thought to be necessary for the completion of the project are to be included in the work plan and identified as proposer-suggested elements.

Identify all of those, if any, who will be subcontracted to assist you with this project, and the extent of work for which they will be responsible. Include similar reference data for subcontractors and employees as requested above for the main proposer.

Include any other information that you believe to be pertinent but not specifically asked for elsewhere.

D. FEES - 10 points
Submit a fee schedule in a separate sealed envelope with proposal. Fee schedule shall clearly identify each task, number of hours assigned to each task, name and title of individual assigned to each task, hourly rate of each individual, and total hours and total dollar amount for the project.

E. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATOR
Include the name and phone number of person(s) in the organization authorized to negotiate the Professional Services Agreement with the City.

ATTACHMENT - A

MAP OF ZONE G WATER MAINS

TO BE REPLACED
253rd St
Narbonne Ave
Oak St
Lomita Blvd
Oak St
Walnut St
Cypress St
Lomita Blvd
255th St
250th St
Narbonne Ave
Pennsylvania Ave
248th St
Western Ave
263rd St
Pacific Coast Hwy
254th St
253rd St
Feijoa Ave
Palos Verdes Dr N
242nd St
261st St
Eshelman Ave
245th St
Appian Way
Ebony Ln
Regent Ave
Andreo Ave
260th St
251st St
240th St
Rolling Vista Dr
Cayuga Ave
243rd St
Via Madonna
253rd Pl
257th St
256th St
262nd St
Via Desmonde
246th Pl
259th Pl
247th St
246th St
249th St
241st St
Viana Ave
Woodward Ave
Moon Ave
Crenshaw Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
252nd St
Doria Ave
Glentree Dr
247th Pl
Fairview Ave
Dawn St
Turrell St
Lucille Ave
Reed Dr
Bland Pl
Market Pl
Guyson St
Hillworth Ave
Lomita Park Pl
Allbrook St
Kelley Ave
Callison St
Chapman St
Alliene Ave
Nordman St
Steed Ct
Saddle View Rd
Cadiz Dr
Falena Ave
April Ct
Wittick Ct
Avocado St
Via Nova
Esther View Dr
Evans Ct
Hillcrest Ave
Alcor St
Leola St
Benhill Ave
Robin Ln
Forrester Dr
Ocean View Ave
Reed St
Garner St
Via Solano
Stratford Dr
McKenna Ct
Olson Ln
Adamo Ave
Comal Ct
Bani Ave
Abita Ave
Austinbrook Ct
Neko Dr
Noelle Ct
Aubrey Ln
Cypress Circle Dr
Via Tampa
255th St
Lucille Ave
248th St
253rd St
251st St
256th St
248th St
Bani Ave
247th St
246th St
241st St
Doria Ave
247th St
261st St
Alliene Ave
253rd Pl
256th St
259th Pl
254th St
248th St
253rd Pl
257th St
262nd St
Woodward Ave
252nd St
259th St
Via Marquette
Monte Vista Ave
Lomita Dr
258th Pl
Ovid Ave 264th St
Hendricks Ave
Stanhurst Ave
Park Haven Pl
Eleanor Pl
Adona Dr
Via Enca nto
Padron Pl
Pennsylvania Dr
Murad Ave
Carlene Ln
Via Vera
Veronica Ln
Monterey Cir
Hillview Ln
Danmar Ct
Ober Ave
Becknel Ave
252nd St
Bani Ave
Appian Way
254th St 254th St
Forrester Dr
Zone G Water Main
Replacement Locations
1930's
1920's
YEARS

PHASE STREET NAME STARTING LOCATION END LOCATION
PHASE 2 247TH PLACE WESTERN STREET END CARDIZ DRIVE. A.C. OVERLAY PHASE 2 WALNUT STREET LOMITA BLVD. 253ED STREET A.C. OVERLAY PHASE 1 EBONY LANE LOMITA BLVD. WALNUT STREET A.C. OVERLAY A. C. RECONSTRUCTION ZONE G

PAVEMENT RESTORATION

ZONE G - WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT

ATTACHMENT - B
LINK TO THE 2022 WATER

MASTER PLAN
https://lomitacity.com/wpcontent/uploads/2023/01/
Attachment-B-2022-WaterMaster-Plan.pdf

ATTACHMENT - C

SELECTED PAGES FROM
THE 2012 WATER ATLAS
&É
&É &É
&É
&É &É &É
&É
&É &É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É &É &É
&É&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`C"` C"` C"`C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`C"` C"`
C"`C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G G!. !.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
"b
"b
25837

52.80 52.82
25830
25838
N.C.
6" C.I., 1928 6" C.I., 1928
6" C.I., 1928
6" C.I., 1928
6" C.I., 1928
25832 - 36 3/4
25840
2074
1928 (ABAN.)
17'
30'
6" D.C.

SPEC. 13-122 (P.C.)
SPEC. 13-186 (P.C.) 1983
20" I.D. 1/4" PIPE CASING (70')
12 3/4" STEEL PIPE, 10 GA.
2"
CHECK
8" DETECTOR
12 50
125

68.75 68.75

53.60 52 52.80
2 "
30'
32'
1 1/2"
15 18
35 112.50 75 147.57 246.37 50.60 105.65 158.45 52.80
387.50
387.50
382.70
266.94
90 141.93
266.80
12 3/4" O.D. STEEL
25822
2068
2064
2052
2040
2032
2065
2055
2049
2041
25827
25807-11
2112
2142
2123
2111
6" C.I.
2117
15'
1 1/2"
2"
3"
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-161 (P.C.) 1979
10'
10'

34.37 68.75
166.80 100
266.80

2.50 65.60
125
354.50

81.35 372.50
372.70
297.71
35 70.65
75 75

97.50 100 166.80
266.80
266.80
266.95
266.95
2212 1/2
25829
25829-31
25835
258432205
2201
2209 1/2
25808
2166
2156
25834
12'

97.50 5'
5' 4' 70.70
202.17

5.6 100 105.60
137.50
266.80
115
110 115 115 47.66
105.67

44.83 44.82

55.50 50.15
150
150
387.67
237.66
45 45 40

56.80 80

87.50 137.50
25 136.80
221.80
221.80
266.80
5 0
5 0
50 80.60
100 50 50 47.50

56.20 55.54
200
50 50 55.6
150
150
45 60.60
45 60.60
212.50
105.60
162

53.10 52.50

52.50 200.50
200.50
137.50 137.50 62.50
50 137.50
266.80
115
266.80
151.80
OAK
188
35 25600
25604
25626 25626 1/22162
2158
2154
2150

PACIFIC COAST
2171
25600
1 1/2"
1 1/2"
6" DETECTOR
CHECK
25609
25617
SPEC. 13-70
4" C.I.
25610
25616
25617 25615
25619
25629
25633
25637
25608
25616
25620
25632
25636
6" C.I. 1928
12" A.C. 1968
12" A.C. 1968 5' 2130
2120
2116
2104
2169
2159
2155
2113
2119
2107
2101
25640
256442073
2069
1 1/2"
2059
2037
2031
6" C.I. 1928
6" C.I. 1928

80.60 100.80 45 10.6'

49.40 56.20
166 100.80
50 97.50

97.50 172.50
200
266.80
8 0

NARBONNE
"
137.50 97.50

68.75 97.50
"
196.80
8 0

82.50 23.56
6" C.I., 1928
2"
1 1/2"
25540
25636
25542
25615
25625
25627
25610
25616
25622 25624
1928
1 0 0
95' 42'
2218
2212
2204
2219
2207 2209
6" C.I. 1928
25611
25615
6" A.C. 1968
Y.
158.43
158.45
387.66
110 115 47.66
50 50 50 53 109.50

80.60 80.60
35 212.50
25614
2144
2"
2132
2126
2124
2118
2112
25605
25609 25608 1/2 6" C.I. 1928
(ABAN.) 4
C.I. 1928

23.56 30.60
135
50 50.30
172.50

94.70 115.30

53.60 112.60 97.40
112.60
52 72.50
2" FLUSH OUT

IN METER BOX
25546-48
(
)
25541
25601
25609
2160
8 0
N.C.

EM'T OF L.A. WW DIST. 13
VAULT, SPEC. 13-181 (P.C.)
2"
6" C.I. 1928
8" DETECTOR CHECK SPEC. 13-173 (P.C.)
10' X 47' EASEM'T OF L.A. CO. DIST. 13
12" A.C. 1966
6" C.I. 1928
2"
2"
151.80
AVE.

ST.

HWY.
39' 26' 4' 25'

16.5' 20'

46.5'
10'
25624
25624
1/2
25626
25626
1/2
25628
25628
1/2
25610 25612
25614 1/2 25614
2211
2030
2213
2124
2154
21502148
2146
25610
1/2
25612
1/4
25612
1/2
25612
3/4
25614
1/4
25614
3/4
AVE
43-01
38-01
38-02
38-03
38-04
38-05
38-06
38-07
38-08
38-09
38-10
38-11
38-12
38-13
38-14
38-15
38-16
38-17
38-18
38-19
38-20
38-21
38-22
38-23
38-24
38-25
38-26
38-27
33 33-2
33-26
33-30
6" C.I., 1928

ZONE II

ZONE II

ZONE II
ZONE I
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")38
38 33
43 37 39
44 34
42 32
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 39
See Map: 33 34
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 43
32 42 44
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 37
MAP
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É&É
&É
&É
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`C"`C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
!
!
!
!
132 73.64
132
299.86
6 9 . 2 5
336.24
ST.
(SPEC 13-122 PC) 1976
5'
18'
131.67
2029
111.41
105
175.94
26016
047
68 93.3 85 101.3
26105
58'
7'
24' 26' 25' 2047 2051
2057
2061
2081
103.51
39' 25'
24'
261ST
ST.
125
20 5'
2070
147.54
126.18
2062
2058
2040
55 55 55 55 55.3
40 25' 27'
26' 35' 30'
114.34
61'
20 29
26029
2" M
26039 - 26047
4" D. I. 2002
113.60
66 68.70
ON 1975
1 1/2"
26015
26027 1/2 26027
26109
26100
26016
26020
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-56 1966
8" C.I. 1928
1 1/2"
26110

PLUGGED
AT TEE 101.81

35.12 259TH

AVOCADO
211.24
OAK
290
470
66 66 62.78
387.50
105.60
387.50
372.74
186.20
" "
65 387.50
382.76
2035
2029
2032 106
40 143.5

58.5 58.5 84.5
83 105.6
111.31
66 65.95

97.08 60.6
70 52.3 50 50

97.12 50 50 50.3
ST.
25907
132.31 50.23 100
2052
2046
2041
22'
26019
67 26107
26038-44
4 0
101.9
25925
25937
25900
25928
25923 25925 25927
26004
26006
4 5

35.12 35.12
26005
25921
259322066
2033
2028
25938
2026
25904
25915

2.50 240
143
290
372.50
372.50
372.50
25837
1 1/2"
1 1/2"
2"
2"
6" D.C.
2"
2"
2"
2"
25916
25920
2"
2"
25925
25941
26001
26025
4" X 1" DET. CHECK
SPEC. 13-98(PC)
6" STL.
1972
25930
26004
6" C.I. 1928 8" C.I. 1928
12" COUPLING
STORM DRAIN PROJECT NO. 77
26012
2"
1 1/2"
2"
(SPEC. 13-149)
12" STL.-10G. STL. CMC&CML

OVERCROSSING STORM DRAIN

52.80 52.82
53 25830
25838
4 25832 - 36 3/4
25840
6" C.I., 1928 (ABAN.)
25846
17'
1 1/2"
30'
6" D.C.

SPEC. 13-122 (P.C.)

68.75 68.75

53.60 52 52.80 52.80
25844
53 105.62

12.45 51.11

60.02 112.50 75 147.57 246.37 105.60 " 65.60
387.50
382.73
382.75

50.60 105.65
158.45 52.80
387.50
387.50
382.70
382.72
25822
25827
15'
1 1/2"
2"
3"
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-122 (P.C.) 1976

34.37 68.75

2.50 65.60
125
354.50
354.50

2.50 81.35
372.50
372.70
297.71
35 70.65
75 75
25829-31
25835
25843
25905
25834
25900
25917
12' 5'
5' 4' 70.70
4" A.C. (1954) SPEC. 13-4
4" A.C.
6" C.I.
(ABAN.)
SPEC. 13-161
(1979)
4" C.I., 1950 4" A.C., 1963 SPEC. 13-30
8" A.C.,
4" A.C.,
6" A.C., 1961
12" A.C.,
12" X 12" TEE 12"X4" REDUCER
4" GATE VALVE
2"M
2"

VALVES INSTALLED

HORIZONTALLY
50" DEEP
30" DEEP
2' DEEP
(SPEC. 13-122 P.C. ) 6"D.C.

EM'T OF L.A. WW DIST. 13
VAULT, SPEC. 13-181 (P.C.)
2"
2 8" DETECTOR CHECK SPEC. 13-173 (P.C.)
10' X 47' EASEM'T OF L.A. CO. DIST. 13
12" A.C. 1966
6" C.I. 1928
2"
12"A.C. (SPEC. 13-122)
2"
2"
2" F.O. IN BOX
COVER
28' WIDE EASEMENT TO

WATER & SEWER

CITY OF LOMITA FOR

WITH TRAFFIC
LN.) RUSTIC (FORMERLY
54" R.C.P.

STORM DRAIN
72" R.C.P.
72" R.C.P.

OMINIUM)

OMINIUM)

STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN
AVE.

ST.

OAK

NARBONNE
7 11'

16.5 50'
20'

32.8'
20'
29 26' 14' 52.8' 61' 25' 8'
10'
12' 50' 50' 52.8'
18'
2 5

16.518'
18'
12'
20'
8' 37
3' 36' 76' 25'
20' 20' 18'
21'
25904
25929
25934
26004
2154
21502148
2146
26037 26037A 26035 26033 26031 26029 26027
B
43-01
43-02
43-03
43-04
43-05
43-06
43-07
43-08
44-01
44-02
44-03
44-04
44-05
38-25
43-09
12" A.C. 1966

ZONE II

ZONE II

ZONE II

ZONE II
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")43
43 38
47 42 44
48 39
46 37
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 44
See Map: 38 39
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 47
37 46 48
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 42
MAP
&É&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!. G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
!
!
!
6" C.I. (ABAN'D)
(SPEC. 13-222) 1965
12" STL. ZONE I TRANSMISSION MAIN ABAN'D 1949
12" D.I. (ZONE II SUPPLY) (1994) SPEC 13-80
AVE.
263RD 5 0 6 0
4 2
132.48

81.41 96.28
1956 6" A.C.
100
25 26225

53.72 50

50.82 115.16
5 5
1 1/2"
4" C.I.
6" C.I. 1939
12" C.I., SPEC. 13-53 1966
1" COPPER
50 117.27
2036

51.36 57.5 57.5 57.5
10'
12" STL.

EASEMENT FOR

WATER PIPE

LINE PURPOSES

99.86 141.52

84.91 130.07

38.06 160.82
110.82
171.18

64.66 148.33
165
123.03

81.62 69.53
4" C.I.
26263

METROPOLITAN WATER

DISTRICT METERED

CONNECTION
TEMP. EMERGENCY CONN.

COUPLINGS)
(SPEC. 13-74)
FLGD. & VICTLC.

TO M.W.D. (8" STL. MAIN )
2 5
6" ABAN'D
51" MWD PALOS VERDES FEEDER
APPIAN
1-1/2" CROSS OVER
26307
26275
1993
ABAN'D
12" STL. 1949
MWD SERVICE CONN.

W.B. 8B FROM SECOND

LOWER FEEDER IN
262ND ST.

ABAN'D
ABAN'D
ABAN'D
2" COP.
20" DEEP
8" D.I. 1990 (F.A.)
1990
2" F.O. ON 4" C.I.

64.7 36.60
65 29.20

45.39 46.39 18.05
50 50

19.55 33.38

60.73 60 60 60 60
55 73
85 23.56 50
62 43

39.27 48.73 75

9.31 60.03 62.77

60.04 15.59

57.03 51.84
35 35

21.95 2088 50.94 45

23.05 43.47 20.46

35.25 35.23

20.46 33

24.08 45.76

20.95 18.33

18.23 5.50

62.90 3.51

7.27 9.28

ABANDONED
OAK
ST.
262ND ST.

GUYSON ST. OBER
MURAD AVE.
16'
8'
2092

65.16 32'
7 3 .0 8
8'
4 2
2097
120
1956
(SPEC. 13-10)
PLUG

73.64 132
307.59

55.30 78.35
100.40
290
265.10

56.56 251.83
299.86
291.42
6 9 . 2 5

71.30 296.28
336.24
115
150

93.15 116
160
5 5
12" A.C.
12" AC (SPEC 13-122 PC) 1976
8" C.I. (ABAN. 5-78) 1928
26202
17 35.5'

32.5'
16'
5'
18'
131.67
111.41
105
175.94
26016
WWD 13-60 OF 1967
2096
26229
6" A.C.
26230
2058
5'
90 2054
18'
5 0
33 8'
14'(SPEC. 13-10)
4 2064
2028
4 2
2035
178.54
APPIAN WAY BOOSTER 53.99 53.98 5'
59' 26'
2068
35' 45.5'
6" A.C.
8" C.I.
27' 27'
29' 20'
(SPEC. 13-10)
ABANDONED UNDER WWD 13-60 OF 1967
2080
2074
2086
2047
10'
46' 11'
2073
2059-65
2051
6'
68 93.3 85 101.3 2079
19' 38'
1956
26105
26111
26113 39
26117
6'
6 0
32'
26205
58'
2094
15'
26208
26216

14.5 26232
12" C.I. 1970 (SPEC. 13-89)
FROM M.W.D.
5 25'
16'
26221
261ST
ST.
12 20 5'
2070
147.54
126.18
2062
2058
2040
55 55 55 55 55.3
40 25' 27'
26' 35' 30'
114.34
61'
20 2048
26215
2057
2065
2071
2083
2077
2087
2093
2056
2" M
26039 - 26047
4" D. I. 2002
4" D.I.
26121
26211
2077
26100-12
2085-91
2075
26224
2081
2045
(SPEC. 13-60)
26229
26220
1956
2048

PUMPING

PRESSURE
REDUCING STA26255
26235
6" A.C.
1956
26242
(SERVICE RESIDENCE

OUTSIDE CITY)
156.56 57'
113.60
143
290.04
263.85
13 6 . 4 7
55 55 47
290.33
132.07 66
55 68.70 50
1 1/2"
26027 1/2 26027
26109
26100
8" C.I. 1928
8" C.I. 1928 (ABAN. 5-78)
1 1/2"
26123
26110
26217
26130
26132
26120
6" DETECTOR CHECK
IN VAULT 6" STL.

SPEC. 13-129 1975
2"
2"
1974
4"X1" D.C.

SPEC. 13-108
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-108 1974
116'
12' EASEMENT

35.12 290

62.78 65.95

97.08 60.6

50.23 100
2052
2046
22'
26107
26038-44
4 5
101.9

35.12 2066
2033
2028
240
143
1 1/2"
1 1/2"
2"
8" C.I. 1928

ZONE III

ZONE II
8" C.I.
12" A.C.,
4" A.C. (1954) SPEC. 13-4
6" C
S
(
1928

ABANDONED UNDER
10' EASEMENT
(OR D5681-9031)
11-29-72
AND
CHEVRON PIPELINE CORP. R/W

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES
2" F.O. IN BOX
COVER
2" F.O. IN BOX
COVER
2" M
1 1/2 "M
1 1/2 "M

MWD PRV

MWD VAULT
MWD
CONN.

WITH TRAFFIC

WITH TRAFFIC

A,B,&C A,B,&C
(NO ACCT.)

STATION

OBSTRUCTION IN STREET

TO BLOCK TRAFFIC

SERVICE
262ND ST.

NARBONNE AVE
9'
18'
10'
15'

14.5'
33' 15' 33' 58' 8'

17.5'
6'

16.5' 29' 9' 5' 8'
5'

5.5 2.5 16'
3'
13 14
7 11'
50'

32.8'
94 20'
12'
1'
29 16.5
12'
26209
2032
20542050
2046
2039
26247
26037 26037A 26035 26033 26031 26029 26027
B
26119
48-17
48-18
48-19
48-20
48-21
48-22
47-01
47-02
47-03
47-04
47-05
47-06
47-07
47-08
47-09
47-10
47-11
47-12
47-13
47-14
12" A.C. 1966

ZONE III

ZONE II

ZONE II
II
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")47
47 43
50 46 48
42 44
51 Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 48
See Map: 43 44
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 50
42 51
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 46
MAP

ATTACHMENT - D

SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL

SERVICE AGREEMENT

CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF LOMITA AND XXXXX

This AGREEMENT for Engineering Design Services is entered into this 20th day of December, 2022, by and between the CITY OF LOMITA, a general law city and municipal corporation (“CITY”) and XXXXX (“CONSULTANT”).

R E C I T A L S
A. CITY does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement.

B. Therefore, CITY desires to contract out for Engineering Design Services for the Narbonne Avenue Water Main Replacement & Street Rehabilitation Project C. CONSULTANT warrants to CITY that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement.

D. CITY desires to contract with CONSULTANT to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows:

1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION.

A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as Exhibit A.

B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.

C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT an amount not to exceed $XXXXX, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement.

D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his designee.

E. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its bill for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous

month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in the CONSULTANT'S bill within 30 days after it is received.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

A. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICES attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.

If any part of Exhibit A is inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement.

3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period.

4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by CITY.

5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.

6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is XXXXX. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of CITY.

7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire upon completion of the work, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 12 of this Agreement or extended in writing in advance by both parties.

8. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting

from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.

9. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number.

10. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required by local, state and federal laws in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement, including a business license as specified in Title VI, Chapter 2 of the Lomita Municipal Code.

11. PREVAILING WAGES.

A. Prevailing Wage. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.

Upon request, CITY shall provide CONSULTANT with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request and shall post copies at the CONSULTANT’S principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and CONSULTANT shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

B. Registration/DIR Compliance. If the services are being performed on a public works project of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, CONSULTANT and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). CONSULTANT shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be CONSULTANT’S sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance

requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the DIR against CONSULTANT or any subconsultant that affect CONSULTANT’S performance of services, including any delay, shall be CONSULTANT’S sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered CONSULTANT caused delay and shall not be compensable by CITY. CONSTRUCTION shall defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the DIR against CONSULTANT or any subconsultant.

C. Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

D. Employment of Apprentices. CONSULTANT and all subconsultants shall comply with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.

E. CONSULTANT or subconsultants may not perform work on a public works project with a subconsultant who is ineligible to perform work on a public project pursuant to Labor Code section 1777.1 or 1777.7. Any contract on a public works project entered into between CONSULTANT and a debarred subconsultant is void as a matter of law. A debarred subconsultant may not receive any public money for performing work as a subconsultant on a public works contract. Any public money that is paid or may have been paid to a debarred subconsultant by CONSULTANT on the project shall be returned to CITY. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred subconsultant who has been allowed to work on the Project.

F. CONSULTANT agrees to bind every subconsultant to the terms of the Agreement as far as such terms are applicable to subconsultant’s portion of the work.

CONSULTANT shall be as fully responsible to CITY for the acts and omissions of its subconsultants and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by its subconsultants, as CONSULTANT is for acts and omissions of persons directly employed by CONSULTANT. Nothing contained in these Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between any subconsultant and CITY.

12. TERMINATION.

A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing.

B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date.

C. In the event of such termination, CONSULTANT shall cease services as of the date of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination.

D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated.

13. INDEMNIFICATION.

A. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONSULTANT’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONSULTANT shall reimburse CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
i. If CONSULTANT’S obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of CONSULTANT’S performance of “design professional” services (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, CONSULTANT’S indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, and, upon CONSULTANT obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, CONSULTANT’S liability for such claim, including the cost to

defend, shall not exceed CONSULTANT’S proportionate percentage of fault.

B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 18, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification.

14. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services.

CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.

15. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent CONSULTANT and will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only.

16. AUDIT OF RECORDS.

A. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement.

B. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.

17. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by CITY to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement.

18. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.

A. CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies:

1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. CONSULTANT shall require all subconsultants similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by CONSULTANT for CITY.

2. General Liability Coverage. CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.

3. Automobile Liability Coverage. CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.

4. Professional Liability Coverage. CONSULTANT shall maintain professional liability insurance for protection against claims to the extent arising out of the negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by CONSULTANT or by its employees, subconsultants, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-peroccurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any negligent acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.

B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California,

or which is approved in writing by CITY, and shall be endorsed as follows.

CONSULTANT also agrees to require all CONSULTANTs, and subconsultants to do likewise.

1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to the commercial general liability and automobile liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.”

2. The commercial general liability and automobile liability policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by CITY, including any self-insured retention CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy.

3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.

4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents.

5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.

6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits to not meet the requirements of this Agreement except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been received by CITY.

C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide prompt notice to CITY of any claim or loss against CONSULTANT arising out of the work performed under this agreement.

CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY. At CITY’s option, CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.

E. CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on

file with CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement.

F. Failure on the part of CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above.

G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow CITY, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONSULTANT (as the named insured) should CONSULTANT fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONSULTANT understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONSULTANT as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should CITY pay the SIR or deductible on CONSULTANT’S behalf upon CONSULTANT’S failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, CITY may include such amounts as damages in any action against CONSULTANT for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by CITY due to the breach.

19. USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any CONSULTANTs while performing any portion of this Agreement.

Such approval must include approval of the proposed CONSULTANT and the terms of compensation.

20. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-CONSULTANTs and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-CONSULTANTs and agents.

21. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during CITY’S review of CONSULTANT’S report or plans. Should the CONSULTANT fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to

CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, CITY may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by CITY or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction.

22. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

23. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:

CITY CONSULTANT
City of Lomita
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
ATTN: City Manager
XXXXX
XXXXX
ATTN: XXXXX,
XXXXX
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section.

24. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.

25. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement.

26. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County.

27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written.

28. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party.

29. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city administrator, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY.

30. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission, scanned and delivered via electronic mail, or delivered using digital signature technology approved by CITY. Such facsimile or electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

31. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other.

32. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided.

33. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled.

34. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY.

CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private CONSULTANTs, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency.

35. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (CITY and CONSULTANT initials required at one of the following paragraphs)
By their respective initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONSULTANT hereby acknowledge that CONSULTANT is a “CONSULTANT” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because CONSULTANT’S duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were CONSULTANT employed by CITY. CONSULTANT hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to CONSULTANT commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to CONSULTANT a memorandum detailing the extent of CONSULTANT’S disclosure obligations in accordance with the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.

City Initials ______
CONSULTANT Initials ______
OR
By their initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONSULTANT hereby acknowledge that CONSULTANT is not a “CONSULTANT” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because CONSULTANT’S duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of CONSULTANT in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.

City Initials ______
CONSULTANT Initials ______

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF LOMITA CONSULTANT
Ryan Smoot, City Manager By:

ATTEST:

Kathleen Horn Gregory, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Trevor Rusin, City Attorney

CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION

BARRY WAITE RYAN SMOOT

BILL UPHOFF CITY MANAGER

JAMES GAZELEY

CINDY SEGAWA

MARK WARONEK

CITY OF LOMITA
CITY HALL OFFICES • 24300 NARBONNE AVENUE, LOMITA • CALIFORNIA 90717 (310) 325-7110 • FAX (310) 325-4024 • www.lomitacity.com

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

DESIGN SERVICES FOR ZONE G WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
ADDENDUM No. 1
DATE: May 15, 2023
TO: ALL PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS
SUBJECT: CLARIFICATIONS TO THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Please note the following changes and/or additions to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the project indicated above. The bidder shall execute the certification at the end of this addendum and shall attach the executed addendum to the documents submitted with the proposal.

QUESTIONS
The following are responses to questions received from prospective bidders.

Question 1: Is W 247th Place a private street?

Response to Question 1: W. 247 Place is in public domain, not a private street, please refer to https://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/m/ site.

Question 2: The previous RFP (for Narbonne Ave) included pavement rehabilitation as part of the design scope. Will the City be looking to conduct full-width pavement rehabilitation for a portion (or all) of the project limits, or will the pavement rehabilitation be limited to the trench "T" section? Further, the table in Attachment A of the RFP indicates that the pavement rehabilitation for the streets require AC overlay and reconstruction (for Ebony Lane).

Therefore, we would like to confirm the design scope for the pavement. Is it correct to assume the street paving is not part of this RFP, other than a typical trench restoration via “TPatch”? Response to Question 2: The street paving is not part of this RFP, other than a typical trench restoration after back filing, compacting per all standards and “T-Patch” trench top area.

CITY HALL OFFICES • 24300 NARBONNE AVENUE, LOMITA • CALIFORNIA 90717 (310) 325-7110 • FAX (310) 325-4024 • www.lomita.com/cityhall Question 3: 1. The project limits are on/near the border with the City of Los Angeles. The City's Water Atlas Maps (attached to the RFP) appear to be from the previous RFP (for Narbonne Ave). Are there any interconnections with the City of Los Angeles within the project limits? Also, would the City be able to provide the atlas maps for Walnut St, Ebony Ln, and 247th Pl?

Response to Question 3: The relevant Lomita City water pipeline maps are attached. Please check with LA City and / LA County for any interconnections in this area.

Question 4: Would the City like to conduct a soils/geotechnical analysis during the design, or will we use the City's standard trench detail (for bedding and backfill) during construction? Response to Question 4: Keep soils/geotechnical analysis during the design, as an optional item.

Question 5: On the proposal page limits, since the submittal is electronic (email), do 11x17 pages (exhibits) count as one page?
Response to Question 5: Since the submittal is electronic (email), the 11x17 pages (exhibits) count as one page.

Question 6: In Section II.A. IV. it says to provide the fee proposal in a separate sealed envelope. Although, in Section II.E. it says the fee proposal shall be emailed separately.

Would you prefer the fee proposal emailed, mailed, or both? If mailed, where and who would you like it addressed to? Also, regarding the proposal itself, would you like a hard copy in addition to an emailed PDF?
Response to Question 6: Please email both the RFP and Fee Proposal (Separate email).

No hard copies are required.

Question 7: Rather than having a 10-page limit for the Qualification and Experience section, and a 10-page limit for the Scope of Work section, could we instead have a 20-page limit total for both sections so we could include more pages for one of the sections if needed, while not extending the 20-page limit?
Response to Question 7: Yes, 20 pages total for both sections is fine.

Please sign the attached acknowledgement of receipt of Addendum and include the original copy with the proposal submittal.

CITY HALL OFFICES • 24300 NARBONNE AVENUE, LOMITA • CALIFORNIA 90717 (310) 325-7110 • FAX (310) 325-4024 • www.lomita.com/cityhall

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDUM

DESIGN SERVICES FOR ZONE G WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
Complete and sign this acknowledgement form. Enclose the original copy of the acknowledgement in your proposal. Failure to do so may result in disqualification of your firm’s proposal.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1 dated May 15, 2023 ATTEST: _____________________________________
Principal: _____________________________________
Address: _____________________________________
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
Legal Company Name: _____________________________________ &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É &É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
C"` C"`
C"`C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
!
!
9 4
LOMITA

92.08 62 24.04

29.74 13.85 15
68 342.89
42 42 42 42 42 43 44 44
114.33 57.17
114.33
341
341
167
111.94

51.08 5

68.50 81.98
50 127.75

85.66 115.22
157.52
11'
80 50.62

69.38 50
155.92

67.62 41.9

76.83 50.43
179.66
45 45
90 305.53
65 27.1

57.17 21'
30'
8 8
53'
65'
248TH ST.
1950 - 1952 1/2
1942
1968
1964
1960
1956
1950
1946
1942
1938
24818
1936
1934
1932
1930 1928
1926
1918
1938
24919
24921
24909
24907
1864
1879
1887
56'
5 0
60 24930
4" X 1" MCT
5 250TH ST.
248TH ST.

ESHELMAN
2055
2051
2043
2037
2031
2027
2021-25
2017-19
2013-15
6" CI 1928
4 C.I. 1954

24.04 93.54 24.0

14.5 14.5
T.
42 45

50.5 45 47.5 45
117.74 142.75
117.5
142.5
153.01 129.04
118.75 138.29
151.27 138.29

68.75 56.25
151.56 138.30
198.22
137.52 200
175.49 200
142.49 233
50 45
ST.
247TH
60 25.27

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
WALNUT ST.
5 2 247TH ST.
5 0
9 4
45 ALLEY
15 74.43 131.27

74.63 74.63 74.80 116.65

74.63 74.63 65.37

73.34 74.63 116.09
107.96
105.47

70.71 105.01

95.70 93.76

79.84 120
121.72

28.55 60 60 59.96 83 80

35.75 44.3948.98 16.25

6.49 68

52.99 23.57 59.29

14.63 41.11

7.67 27.89

7.67 14.39

47.05 2.95

63.10 14.09

63.11 50

13.53 8.93 45.98 29.99

39.28 39.34
60 114.53
80 48.50 50

64.50 50

45.33 45.33 63
5 0
6 0

82.76 38
80 85.64
80 43

74.91 46.17 198.66
180.50
133
133
180.50
100

40.50 40
105 0

53.50 63
47 115.64
115.61 101 82.83
167
135
16' 36' 38' 36'
23' 18' 15' 45'
39'
20'
40'
11' 41'
17'
42'
24648 24650 24650 1/2
24658 24656 24654
24648 1/2
24652
5'
45' 24' 20' 20' 42'
67'
27' 8' 29'
8' 6" C.I. 1959 SPEC. 13-17
21'
19'
45'
39' 25'
21'
30'
4" D.C.
24652 1/2
1973
24'
14' 13'
16'
13'
60 1978 1972 1968 1970
24740
24802
24810
1865
24731
24722
24718
24712
24708
24702
1866
AVE
LOMITA
ABITA AVE.

BLVD
44 50
50 50
50 44
38 44
2049
2057
2059 2067
2022 1/2
2022 2024 2024 1/2
2028
2026
2040
2044
2054
2060
2047-5 1/2
2017-19
2021
4 C.I. 1954
6" AC 1954
1955
6" AC
40 40

40.34 63.22

50.85 73.84

83.66 61.41

6.49 56.04
167.80
233.76
184.29 212.50
212.50
243.54 232.50
224.98
225.00
110.52 133.02 196.98
00 48.00
116.04
48 55.22

94.79 95.69

98.29 8 0
54 70

81.26 115.34
24 24644
24645

45.49 23.59
38'
WA
2043
2055

21.26 38
56 38
50 C.I.1928
6" ABANDON
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-187
8 12" A.C. CL. 150
6" C.I. 13-84 1928
10"
8" A.C 1964
6" A.C. 1964
SPEC. 13-58
12" A.C. 1966
12" A.C. CL. 200
ABANDON 6" C.I.
1982 12" A.C. CL. 150
12" A.C. CL. 200
6" C.I. 1961
6" C.I. 1928

ABANDON
10" DCM
SPEC.13-107
11 11
2053
2043
2056
2040
2052
24709
24703
24707
2011
24706
24713
24712
24711
1955
1966
1962
24703
1923
1917
1911
1903
1858
24718 24719
1861
24723
24725 24729
1945
2000
1901
1856
1948
24726
2034
24805
20322026202220162014
24809
24823
2005
24651
24645
1/2
24813
24819
1886
24647 24645
1/41/21/41/23/4
24640 24640
1/4
24640
1/2
24642 24642
1/2
24644
1947
24717
2039
2018
203020282024
2036 2038
24706
24712
24718

VIA KOSTA
19-01
19-02
19-03
19-04
19-05
19-06
19-07
19-08
19-09
19-10
19-11
19-12
19-13
19-14
19-15
19-16
19-17
19-18
19-19
19-20
19-21
19-22
19-23
19-24
19-25
19-26
19-27
24-03
24-02
24-04
24-05
24-07
14-12
14-11
24-18

MITA BLVD
19-28
ZONE I
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")19
19 14
24 18 20
25 15
23 13
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 20
See Map: 14 15
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 24
13 23 25
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 18
MAP
&É
&É
&É &É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É &É &É &É &É
&É
&É
&É
C"` C"`
C"`C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`C"`
C"` C"` C"`C"` C"`C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`C"`
C"`C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G
G!.
"b
"b
"b
"b
1823 1822
54'
97 126.07 45
113.61
113.61

55.68 50

94.46 75 48
50 80 48 40 40 50 50 111 50
40 89.33
85 50 70 112
4 0
4 0
6 95.13
125

47.57 47.55
115
76 75
252ND ST.
25124
25130
25132
25127
25125
25203
25125

24.6'
25208
65' 53'
12'
25124 25126
3'3'3'3' 5' 13' 22' 1' 25'
75 25130
1959
1961
1963
1965
1955
1949
1941
1937
3' 3'
1909
1903
27' 3' 7' 2' 17' 2' 17' 2' 1935 1931
27'
1925
1921
1917
1915

28.6 1827
17'
T.
50 49.9 49.9 50 50 50 50

5.6 110.58

52.80 52.80

97.5 97 111.07
111.07 97
110.07
110.07
98 98
80 126.07

52.80 52.80
LAURA LEE 340.86
154.33
200.33
15 52.60 38.40 50 " " " 50
AVE
5 4
5 4
50 52.60 " 38.40 50 " "

87.04 ELEANOR PL
WALNUT
110.87 59.50 55 55 56 19.50 117.52 111.61 19.50 104.84 65.50 55 55 56 4 6 36' 11.55 31.42

27.42 21.83

8.17 31.65
40 40

25.77 14.23 15.77 27.42 36'

31.42 71.99 71.11

63.40 87.18 50 50 50 55.30

37.20 23.25

87.88 3.70 27.42

19.42 26.30

13.80 105.87
105.88
100.90
105.88
103.94

98.88 99.04
103.96
100.88
105.86
105.86
105.86

63.62 87.30 50 50 50 55

27.42 19.42 37.10 3.70

28.30 26.30 13.80
35 40
35 23 23
23 23
4 6
ALCOR ST.

56.36 145 56.41
51 100

11.99 100
50 50 52.70
127.28
280.28
275.28
275.28

71.345

71.345 142.69

88.50 94.88
51 71.79

20.94 71.99 71.78

40.33 102.64

47.57 20'
1818
1810

32.8'

36.3 27.5
25016
25022
25028
25032
25036
25042
25048
25019
25023
25029
25035
25104
25112
25118 25117
25111
25103
25122
25116
52'
29 25108
21'
26' 27' 2' 24'
1913
1912
1910
1908
1906
15 25110
360
25041-47
1902
1908
1916
1912
1920
1924 1923
1919
1915
1911
1907
1901
12'
12'
3' 3'
3' 3'
1'1'
361
25017
32'
25014
25020
25026
12' 26'
25030 - 36 1/2
25038 - 40 1/2
25044 - 48 1/2
10' 24'
4 5
5 0
2'
25046

99.33 11' 12' 14' 12'
5' 5' 7' 13' 13' 14'
25056 25052 25050 25048
25034 25036 25038 25040 25042 25044
25054
25032
25058 83'
55 123
169.8

97.5 137.5

52.8 " " 52.8
88 88

98.10 14.95

40.03 40.03
50 " " " " 50
50 52.80 52.80 52.80 52.80
50 52.80

82.45 14
29'
25101
25102
25108
25112
25123
25119
25113
25107
25103
2038-40
25013
25019
25023
25029
25033
24' 23.5' 29.5' 29' 22' 28.5' 20.5'

27.5 28'
27' 20' 20' 30' 22' 20' 30' 28' 22'
AVE. DORIA
9 4

51.02 12.99

30.73 8.67

99.54 L E O L A
129.87
1817

92.08 62 24.04 35.04 51.40 50 52.04 51 50
42 42 42 42 42 43 44 44
114.33 57.17
114.33
95 85 80 80.85

55.49 341
341
135
46 MICAH
LANE 206
111.94

51.08 54

43.01 23.55

52.88 32.71

15.70 42.34 10.97

40.44 24.55 28.27 27.34

23.57 68.50 90.70

81.98 101.21
108.40
50 83.13
4 0
127.75

85.66 115.22
157.52
65 27.1

57.17 57.16 57.17 57.16
53'
65'
8 0
24818
1936
24919
24921
25001
25007
24909
24907
1864
1821

28.5'
24 56'
5 0
25006
25013 25015 25013 57.16 57.17 60
1829
24930
49'
4" X 1" MCT
5 250TH ST.
2055
2051
2043
2037
2031
2027
2021-25
2017-19
2013-15
6" CI 1928
41 41

53.04 50

24.04 36.05
50 50 50 50
110.54

53.05 93.54 24.04

14.5 14.5
122
41 CT. MERTZ

50.5 142.75
142.5
138.29
129.04
138.29
138.30
200
200
233
ST.

ANDREO AVE.
252ND ST.
5 4
4 2
4 2

85.84 84.28 7.67 17.61

14.95 17.62 7.67
40 23.56

52.81 52.79
55 55.25 51.96 53 52

82.50 95.54

23.5639 52 53 38.12 13.89 6.57
5050

4.53 13.94 38.12 56 50.48
97 52.80

50.24 94.46

52.34 52.94
27' 25' 26' 18'
31' 30' 24' 25' 28' 30'
2 1
H
28' 25' 28' 27' 33' 24'
'
25' 30' 19' 35' 31' 16'
25118
25122
25128
25134
25133
25129
25138
252ND

29.89 89.84

81.20 26.10

34.24 34.24
24'
4" C.I. (ABAND.)
12" A.C.
12" A.C. 1976
8"X1" D.C.
6" C.I. 1928
1"
6" C.I.
6" A.C. CL150 1974 (SPEC. 13-124)
2"
6" A.C. SPEC. 13-166
6" C.I.
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-187
6" C.I. 1928
6" A.C. 1959
6 10"
6" A.C. 1958
1 1/4"
10" DCM
5025
24823
1825
2044
25003
2048
25002
2052
25003
25006 25004 25002 25000
25007 25009
25008
25037 25039
25043 25045
25049 25049
1909
1907190519031901
1911
25108 25107
19041902
25157 25127
25203
25151
25213
8 24819
1886
25120 25118
25107 1/2
LANE

ESHELMAN

ESHELMAN AVE
ST
19-26
24-01
24-03
24-02
24-04
24-05
24-06
24-07
24-08
24-09
24-10
24-11
24-12
24-13
24-14
24-15
24-16
24-17
25-10
29-01
29-02
29-03
29-04
29-06
29-05
29-07
29-08
29-20
23-13
23-14
24-18
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")24
24 19
29 23 25
30 20
28 18
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 25
See Map: 19 20
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 29
18 28 30
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 23
MAP
&É
&É &É
&É &É &É &É &É
&É
&É &É
&É&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É &É &É
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`C"`
" C"` C` C"` C"` C"` C"`C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`C"`
C"` C"` C"`C"` C"`C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!. G!.

G!.

G!. G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
"b
"b
15 135
254TH

61.34 4 0
122.69 20'
50 321.90 1850
1822
116.38 49.95 50
116.38

62.69 60
101.38
266.33
266.28
343.88
102.06
1854
1859
1855
1863
5' 20.5' 12'
44 23.55
667
150

52.81 52.03 52.53 2018
25340
25356

52.50 64.06
25360

52.81 52.80

52.81 52.80 40
111.05
109.47
25346
52 51.50
6" A.C. 1956
135
95 22.5 111.5
111.5

98.5 77.92

97.92 105.6
95 97.29
25314

39.27 40 40 50
97 50 50 50 50

30.38 50 " " " " 50

27.86 21.43 100.16 102.21

22.14 32.04

45.7 46 43 43 42 22 21 43 "
122.69
122.69
142 . 6 0

40.38 43 48.3

47.89 46 46.11
120.19 120.19

61.35 4" C.I., 1928
34'
6" STL.
29'
25402
6" C.I., 1928 6" C.I., 1928
4" C.I. (ABANDONED) 1928 4" C.I. (ABANDONED) 1928
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-106 1974 12" A.C. SPEC. 13-106 1974
15'
20'
15'
12" A.C., SPEC. 13-99 1973
25405

28.5'

28.5'
6" C.I. 1928 6" C.I. 1928
25344 1865
25349
25401
25353
27'
4" C.I. 1928
25323
25338
71'
73'
25316
25345
253431904
18'
18'
12'
12'
12'
2009
25320
25330
2012
2006
2002
19'
6'
25341
54'

38.5' 25'
33'
1925
1921
1915
1920
5'
1933
1928
1924
25' 25' 24' 11.3'
1959
1953
1947
1939
14' 8'13'
1916
1971

26.5'
1950
1944
1940
1936
1932
24'
1960
1956
1954
1963
1959
1955
1949
1939
1935
1927
22'
1925
1921
1917

14.5' 4 '
6" A.C. 1961
2015
25350
25345 - 49
25335
1945

15.83 110.53 52.81 52.80 52.80 52.81

61.62 52.8 52.8 105.8 55.31 50.30
N.
" 68.75
110.53
110.53
107.79

57.8 52.81 52.80

30.38 18.62

4.01 52.81

45.99 97.69 7.86

76.60 40.95

14.26 35

43.43 7.86
50 18.02 18.62 12.36
5 0
27 27 5 4

62.92 23.56
23' 24' 25.8' 22' 31'

29.5' 31' 29'
25321
25320
25316
25321
25325
25331
25337
25341
25347
25351
25355
25361
5 4
2'

25.5'
21' 22.5
88 134.61

22.61 132.50
54'
97 126.07 45
113.61
113.61
111.11

55.68 50

52.8 52.8

94.46 96.96

52.8 52.8
113.61
111.11
111.11
111.11
112

96.96 52.8
105.6
121.70
113.36
75 48
50 80 48 40 40 50 50 111 50
40 89.33
85 50 70
40 40 50 " " " " 50
112
70 50 51 49 50

55.69 58
4 0
4 0
R=15
4 0
4 0

23.56 120
50 67 R=15
124.32

21.39 96

46.34 15

58.86 58.84 58

44.69 R=15

95.13 125

47.57 47.55
115
115
105

28.27 29.57

57.38 40
76 80
75 286.12
252ND ST.
253RD ST.
161.44 41.32
137.38
29 13' 23'
25304
1852
25317
115.55
50 1943
1927
1954
1948
1959 1/2
25316
40 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
25124
25130
25132
25127
25125
25206
25218
25222
25304
25315
25303
25301
25221
25211
25203
25125
25308
25301
1952
1940
1934
19501924
1918
1912
1908
57 15

61.34 61.34
32'
2' 25'
5' 28'
1953
1949
1941
193119271925

19.5' 7' 17' 30' 61'
107
117
25225

35.6' 10' 25' 26' 11' 25' 20' 9'
2'
25213
25201

58.84 58.85
1934
1930
192619181914
4 5

24.6' 10' 6'
25216
25212
6'
25208
65' 53'
12'
25124 25126
1948
1944
1940
1950
3'3'3'3' 5' 13' 22' 1' 25'
75 25130
1959
1961
1963
1965
1955
1949
1941
1937
3' 3'
1909
1903
27' 3' 7' 2' 17' 2' 17' 2' 1935 1931
27'
1925
1921
1917
1915

28.6 80
17'
AVE. ESHELMAN
EBONY
WALNUT
ST.

LN.
126.07

63.62 87.30 50 50 50 55

56.3 47.57

32.8'
25122
15 52.80
25123
DORIA
AN
252ND ST.
5 4
5 0
4 2
5 0

DORIA AVE
253RD
254TH
5 4
27 27
5 4
40 23.56

52.81 52.79

51.96 53 52

82.50 95.54

23.5639 52 53
56 50.48 38.19

12.46 6.16

44.89 88.03 85

23.56 23.56 40.67
50 52 50.50 50 55.31

38.19 11.84

4.78 44.89
50 52 55.67 53 50 52.81

52.81 52.80
97 52.80

50.24 94.46

52.34 52.94 52.75 52.74 52.75

51.57 1.17

94.31 90.81

52.80 94.70

94.70 113.36

89.03 79.03

39.27 23.5644.30

34.30 52.81

52.81 26'
21' 28' 27' 26' 24' 19' 23' 36' 27' 25' 26'
16'
23' 22' 30' 24' 26' 30' 5 31' 30' 24' 25'
2 1
H.
27' 33' 24'
12'
6' 27' 27' 34' 28'
19' 35' 31' 16' 20' 19' 26' 29' 28' 22' 24' 28'
25 25312
25122
25128
25134
25202
25206
25212
25218
25222
25306
25133
25129
25203
25207
25213
25219
25223
25305
25307
25315
25138
25202
25212
25308
252ND

34.24 4"
6" A.C. 1958
12" A.C.
8" A.C. 4" A.C.
8" A.C. SPEC. 13-158
6" C.I. 4" C.I.
6" C.I. 1928
4" C.I. (ABAND.)
12" A.C.
1"
2"
6" A.C. 1956
6" A.C. 1958
6"A.C.1956
6" A.C. 1958
1 1/4"
ST.

PL.

ANDREO AVE. 8'
15'
6 25350
25346
25351
25337
1962
1958
1926
1943
25157 25127
25203
25151
25213
1956
25209
25208 25219
1959
194519191913
25219
25217
25220
1944
25302
1958
25210
25214 1967
25313
25120 25118
25216
E
ANDREO AVE.
28-01
29-01
29-02
29-03
29-04
29-06
29-05
29-07
29-08
29-09
29-10
29-12
29-11
29-13
29-14
29-15
29-16
29-17
29-18
29-19
29-20
29-21
29-22
29-23
29-24
29-25
29-26
29-27
29-28
29-29
29-30
29-31
34-01
34-02
34-03
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")29
29 24
34 28 30
35 25
33 23
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 30
See Map: 24 25
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 34
23 33 35
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 28
MAP
&É
&É&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É &É
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
G C"` !.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!. G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!. G!.
"b
"b
"b
"b
!
1771
1759
254TH

61.34 265.98
4 0
4 0
4 5
4 0

76.30 76.30
5 0
5 0
5 3
131.97
5 8
5 8
1 0 0
AVE.

8.38 38
38 27.69
132.69
132.69
122.69
122.69

8.38 20' 23' 30' 19'
3'
253RD
ST.
252ND ST. 5 5
5 0
5 0
109.49

61.68 40
6 2
6 0
6 0
121.17
50 50 75

39.32 40

59.58 13.51

29.63 43.31
321.90
13' 16'
1850
1848
122.69
1844-38
1824
1826 1/2
30' 2' 4 6 3' 2'
2'

M O NT E R E Y
25303
25307
25315
25308
13'

65.06 1822
25206
25204
2520225200
18' 18' 12' 9'
1765
1753
1747
6" A.C. SPEC. 13-125
1768
1764
1760
1811
1755
1745
108.20
1750
1746
1740
1734

86.32 265.28
1826
1830 1832 1834
25314
AVE.
1745-43-411735
152.60
50 50 52.60

52.60 50 50.14 50.50 51.53
65 75

52.60 152.60 50 50

49.95 50 50 116.38
116.38

62.69 60
101.38
266.33
142.69
266.28
343.88
102.06
50 52.21 43.21 139.05
139.44

52.23 50 50
102.23 50 50
41 54
1854
1850
1842
1836
1832
1826
1820
1810
1806
1800
1859
1855
1849
1863

20.5' 12' 26' 5'
1843
1839
1833
2' 2'
1827

11.5'
1811
11'
1807
15'

36.31 1752
1744
1742
122.17
1736
1732
4 17' 22' 22' 19'
29' 2'
6'
10 17' 19' 22' 17'
1801
1755
1751
1745
1737
1733
253 RD. PL.
18'
2" C.I.
33'
34'

51.23 51 50 50

37.25'
40 6'
15 1 5
18'
1752
15' 15'
142.69

68.96 122.69
44 265.28
109.85 89.05
.
144.18
122.69
106.81
104.69
102.58
111.13
1750
1742
260.47
2" C.I. 1939

FLEX COUPLINGS
15'
1750 1/2
/2
150
122.69
122.69
142 . 6 0
4" C.I., 1928
12'
25402
6" C.I. 1928 6" C.I. 1928
25344 1865
25338
71'
73'
25316

88.20 92.10
229.73
50 52.27 50 100 31.50
33 118.27 80 74 53
132.71

72.19 53.40 54

30.04 118.16
118.27
114.79
115.03

46.27 42.44 48.30

41.81 41.80 63.40

41.81 41.80 132.50 15

78.95 108.80 27.48 55 45
121.17
172.48
55 50 50 10 10 67.50 20.42 50.45 14.55

28.95 15.69
19'
SPEC. 13-92
38'
54'
1828
1816
2'
1818 1/2 1818 1820
25317
25302
1746

65.02 1742
1736
102.58
1738-32

37.23 40.15 47.13
2" C.I.
25228
18451841
18371833182918231817
45 45 45 45 45 60
45 45 45 45
4" C.I. (ABAN.)
1769
1763
1757
1751 1755
1737 - 39
1803
1755
1739
1749
103.25

54.14 54.43 54.14 73.64

68.96 1755
1749
1743
1737
1826 1/4
1733

95.13 125

47.57 47.55
115
115
105

28.27 29.57

57.38 40
76 80
75 286.12
161.44 41.32
137.38
29 13' 23'
25304
1852
4 5

24.6' 10' 6'
25216
25212
6'
25208
65' 53'
12'
25124 25126
80 17'
EBONY
LN.
25122

47.57 ST.
1 0 0
252ND

34.24 117.91

86.42 47.57
32'
4"C.I 1939
6" A. C.
6"
1928
2" C.I. 1939
1928
1928 (ABANDONED)
SPEC.13-219 P.C.
6" A.C.NCL. 200
4" C.I. 1939
4" STL.
2" C.I. (ABAN.) 1939
6" A.C. SPEC. 13-158 1978
8" A.C. SPEC. 13-158
6" C.I. 4" C.I.
6" C.I. 1928
1"
2"C.I.
1 1/4"
BDRY LINE OF CITY OF L.A.

ST.

CIR.

WESTERN
1849 1/2
1837
1833
1819
18107 1/4
1837 1/4 1837 1/2
1809 1/2 1809 1807 1/2
1805 1803
25350
25346
25149
25144
25157
25203 25152
25213
25208
25208 25219
25216
25220
25154 25150 25148
2"
25-1
30-01
30-02
30-03
30-04
30-05
30-06
30-07
30-08
29-06
29-05
07 29-08
29-09
29-10
12 29-11
3 29-14
29-27
34-01
34-03
35-01
35-07
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")30
30 25
35 29
24 34
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: Index
See Map: 25
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 35
24 34
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 29
MAP
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!. G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
"b
1771
1759
252ND ST. 5 5
5 0
5 0
1823 1822
1819
1815
6 4
2 0
18' 18' 12' 9'
1765
1753
1747
6" A.C. SPEC. 13-125
768
764
760
50 46
40 34

88.20 1745-43-411735

92.10 229.73
50 52.27 50 100 31.50
76 33
118.27 80 74

30.04 108.80
19'
SPEC. 13-92
38'
54'
4" C.I. (ABAN.)
1769
1763
1757
1751 1755
1737 - 39
1733

95.13 125

47.57 47.55
115
76 75

24.6'
25208
65' 53'
12'
25124 25126
1827
17'
51 100

11.99 100
50 50 52.70
127.28
280.28
275.28
275.28

71.345

71.345 142.69

88.50 94.88
51 71.79

20.94 71.99 71.78

40.33 102.64

47.57 20'
1818
1810
25122
25116
52'
29 25108
12'
32'
25014
25020
25026
12' 26'
25030 - 36 1/2
25038 - 40 1/2
25044 - 48 1/2
10' 24'
4 5
5 0
138.92 1 0 0
1 0 0
205.91
291.88
8 8
304.42

24.21 9 4

84.33 109.11
114.01

86.70 51.02

52.67 11.33
73 103.29

28.66 19.27

12.99 30.73

8.67 87.17

91.58 99.54

L E O L A
ST. 168.66
1813
1837
1851
1 112.04
75 129.49
250.01
1803
1803
1801
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1739 1737
1825 39'
6" DETECTOR CHECK IN VAULT
129.87
19'
40'
1801
1807
1811
1817
50 402.34

24.65 4,14

31.77 50.06
8'-6" X 7'-6" R.C. BOX
LOMITA BLVD. DRAIN
1813
112.65

43.38 109.76
1809
1809
1807
1807
1805
1805
1801
1/2
6" C.I.

BLVD.
111.94

51.08 54

43.01 23.55

52.88 32.71

15.70 42.34 10.97

40.44 24.55 28.27 27.34

23.57 68.50 90.70

81.98 101.21
108.40
50 83.13
4 0
127.75

85.66 115.22
157.52

27.1 57.17 57.16 57.17 57.16
1864
1821
1829
24930
BLVD.
8 8
8 0
ST.
4 0
251ST
ST.
15 15
5 0
1 0 0
8 0
15 15
252ND
AVE.

EBONY
LANE
LOMITA
115.08 20
381.17
74 99 54.14

29.89 20.11 37.21 31.25 29.14

89.84 85.45
52 34.66
15 458.41
336.38
142.69

71.345 71.345
60 82.69
214.35
185.75
185.75
142.69

76.60 65 176.65

81.20 91.99
102.92
137.95

88.10 32.90

7.84 13.97

36.89 21.15

26.10 34.24

34.24 117.91

86.42 47.57
155.42 60 75.02
140.84 60 95
120.02
60 50 70 95
132.99

31.40 26.72
47 73 77.99

28.22 55

69.58 45

73.08 191.76
121.75

53.64 51.66 28.63

53.23 60 60
5 31.41

29.82 60 60 95 102.28 50 50
256.15
123.67 50 93.62

65.79 156.83

9.82 73.60

99.56 75.62
51 51 52.28 50 100 29.97 120.17 45 50
24'
123
83'
15'
93'
40 60
15'
20'
17'
20 140.39
80 66
32' 32'
38'
32'

51.32 1810 - 1848
1806
1800
25109
25111 - 15
25125 - 27 1/2
25110
1732
1734
1742
25024
1739
1735
25014
1748
6" A. C.
1928
2" C.I. (ABAN.) 1939
6" A.C. SPEC. 13-158 1978
1"
6" C.I.
(SPEC. 13 - 107)
6" C.I. 1928

ABANDON
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-187
6" C.I. 1928
6" A.C. 1959
12" A.C. CL. 150
10"
10" A.C. CL. 150

ABANDON
(SPEC. 13 - 107)
8" A.C. CL. 150 1982
(SPEC. 13- 107)
PROP. SPEC. 13-195 (PC)
10" A.C.
10" S, 10 GA

ABANDON
6" C.I.
6" A.C.
4 C.I.
1939
(SPEC.13-158)
(SPEC. 13-138) 6" A.C. 1976
1 1/4"
1825
1800
1731
25131
25139
25136
25149
25144
25157
25203 25152
25213
25122
1886
25120 25120
1/2
25120
3/4
25154 25150 25148
25116

WESTERN
9-26
24-01
24-03
24-02
24-04
1 24-12
4-13
25-02
25-01
25-03
25-04
25-05
25-06
25-07
25-08
25-09
25-10
25-11
30-01
30-02
30-03
30-04
30-05
29-06
29-05
07 29-08
6" A.C. 1982
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")25
25 20
30 24
19 29
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: Index
See Map: 20
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 30
19 29
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 24
MAP
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É&É
&É
&É &É
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`C"`
C"`C"`
C"`C"`
C"`C"`
C"`C"` C"`C"`
C"`C"` C"`C"`
C"`C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
" C"` C"`C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!. G!.

G!. G!.

G!.

G!.

G G!. G!.
!.

G!.

G!.
110

63.66 117.54
103.47

96.64 96
96 52.13 52.10 50.50 50 81.83

52.12 30.99 21.12 51.01

40.11 11.85

10.3510
138.92
157.52
1 0 0
205.91
304.42

24.21 9 4
01 86.70
168.66
1813
1837
1851
1859
1865
1828
1822
1818
1812
1808 1802
112.04
75 129.49
250.01
1803
1803
1801
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1739
737
6" C.I. 1928
1825 39'
6" DETECTOR CHECK IN VAULT
50 55.5 55.5 55.5 56.70 110

72.60 56.59

63.66 81.83

72.58 402.34

24.65 4,14

31.77 55.66
1813
112.65

43.38 109.76
1809
1809
1807
1807
1805
1805
1801
1/2
ST
248TH
LOMITA
167
111.94

51.08 5

68.50 81.98
50 127.75

85.66 115.22
157.52

27.1 57.17
1864
1879
1887
24930
BLVD.

BOUNDARY OF LOMITA

BOUNDARY OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES
6 0
30 30

54.5 54.5 54.5

54.5 54.5 54.5 55.57

54.54 110
110.01
110
110
5 4
27 27
5 4
55 55 55 55

54.58 55.62

56.65 110
110
110
110

52.19 55.96 57 57 57 65.49

55.96 57 57 57 48.79

23.29 45.28 44.75
56 55 55 55 51.71

53.93 55 55 55 48.30
247TH ST
55 60 60.50 60

47.75 47.75 95
40 17.32

55.95 50 50 34.40

31.41 41.40

95.53 91.12
118.59
114.65
110.71

84.14 25.27 33.67

16.33 16.47

50.15 50.15

61.69 53.82

18.5' 61.56 56.07 53.47 51.26 52.48

56.72 35.90 20.30

30.16 62.65

62.46 32.30 191.34
247TH
PL
208.66
208.66
150
167.32
167.32
198.66198.66
198.66

82.83 87.66

92.07 96.27
100.29
114.95
141.74
153.19

61.37 55.90 53.30 51.10 50 50 60

95.70 95.71
6 0
5 4
5 0
5 4

78.65 54.35 53.65
5 4 50 50.25 53.27 60.80 72.20

72.73 39.51

23.65 50.01 33.10 17.17 53.96

66.81 74.41

91.41 99.50
100
100
67 67 82.83
112.50 78 95.25 6 0
26' 30' 4' 8' 3'
2 32
17'
25' 23'
23' 25' 27'
21' 21' 21'

22.5'
27'
26'

26.5'
1829
1823
1817
1811
1803
1745
1741
1737
1731
1746
1742
1736
1730
1746
1802
1810
1822
1816
1834
1826
1838
1846
1840
1836
1832 1830
1824
1820
1814
1808
1852
1748
1742
1736
1732
1749
1743
1737
1731
AV. WESTERN
5 2
5 0
80 48.50 50

64.50 50

45.33 45.33 63
5 0
6 0

82.76 38
80 85.64
80 43

74.91 46.17 198.66
180.50
133
133
180.50
100

40.50 40
105 0

53.50 63
47 115.64
115.61 101 82.83
167
135
45' 24'
8' 6" C.I. 1959 SPEC. 13-17
21'
19'
45'
39' 25'
24740
24802
24810
1865
24731
24722
24718
24712
24708
24702
1866

23.60 79.31 67.34

50.10 54

54.43 30 30

58.42 58.42 58.42 58.42 48.69
247TH ST. 23.52
35 36
24616
24623
54 45.49 23.59
38'
C.F. 41
(SPEC. 13 - 107)
6" C.I. 1928

ABANDON
C.I.1928
6" ABANDON
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-187
8 12" A.C. CL. 150
10"
SPEC. 13-84
4-C.I.-1928
8" A.C. 1967 (SPEC, 13-55)
8" A.C 1964
11 1858
1839
1833
1829
1845
1849
1855
1861
1856
1850
1844
17361730
1886
1823
24825
1801
1742
W
19-02
19-03
19-04
19-18
9-19
19-20
19-22
23 19-24
19-25
9-26
19-27
24-03
24-02
24-04
15-02
14-12
14-11
20-01
20-02
20-03
20-04
20-05
6" A.C. 1982
4" C.I. 1928 4" C.I. 1928
4" C.I. 1928
ZONE I
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")20
20 15
25 19
14 24
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: Index
See Map: 15
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 25
14 24
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 19
MAP
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É
&É &É
&É &É
&É
&É &É
&É
&É
C"` C"`
C"`C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"` C"` C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
C"`
G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.

G!.
"b
!
!
9 4
LOMITA

92.08 62 24.04

29.74 13.85 15
68 342.89
42 42 42 42 42 43 44 44
114.33 57.17
114.33
341
341
167
111.94

51.08 5

68.50 81.98
50 127.75

85.66 115.22
157.52
11'
80 50.62

69.38 50
155.92

67.62 41.9

76.83 50.43
179.66
45 45
90 305.53
65 27.1

57.17 21'
30'
8 8
53'
65'
248TH ST.
1950 - 1952 1/2
1942
1968
1964
1960
1956
1950
1946
1942
1938
24818
1936
1934
1932
1930 1928
1926
1918
1938
24919
24921
24909
24907
1864
1879
1887
56'
5 0
60 24930
4" X 1" MCT
5 250TH ST.
248TH ST.

ESHELMAN
2055
2051
2043
2037
2031
2027
2021-25
2017-19
2013-15
6" CI 1928
4 C.I. 1954

24.04 93.54 24.0

14.5 14.5
T.
42 45

50.5 45 47.5 45
117.74 142.75
117.5
142.5
153.01 129.04
118.75 138.29
151.27 138.29

68.75 56.25
151.56 138.30
198.22
137.52 200
175.49 200
142.49 233
50 45
ST.
247TH
60 25.27

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
WALNUT ST.
5 2 247TH ST.
5 0
9 4
45 ALLEY
15 74.43 131.27

74.63 74.63 74.80 116.65

74.63 74.63 65.37

73.34 74.63 116.09
107.96
105.47

70.71 105.01

95.70 93.76

79.84 120
121.72

28.55 60 60 59.96 83 80

35.75 44.3948.98 16.25

6.49 68

52.99 23.57 59.29

14.63 41.11

7.67 27.89

7.67 14.39

47.05 2.95

63.10 14.09

63.11 50

13.53 8.93 45.98 29.99

39.28 39.34
60 114.53
80 48.50 50

64.50 50

45.33 45.33 63
5 0
6 0

82.76 38
80 85.64
80 43

74.91 46.17 198.66
180.50
133
133
180.50
100

40.50 40
105 0

53.50 63
47 115.64
115.61 101 82.83
167
135
16' 36' 38' 36'
23' 18' 15' 45'
39'
20'
40'
11' 41'
17'
42'
24648 24650 24650 1/2
24658 24656 24654
24648 1/2
24652
5'
45' 24' 20' 20' 42'
67'
27' 8' 29'
8' 6" C.I. 1959 SPEC. 13-17
21'
19'
45'
39' 25'
21'
30'
4" D.C.
24652 1/2
1973
24'
14' 13'
16'
13'
60 1978 1972 1968 1970
24740
24802
24810
1865
24731
24722
24718
24712
24708
24702
1866
AVE
LOMITA
ABITA AVE.

BLVD
44 50
50 50
50 44
38 44
2049
2057
2059 2067
2022 1/2
2022 2024 2024 1/2
2028
2026
2040
2044
2054
2060
2047-5 1/2
2017-19
2021
4 C.I. 1954
6" AC 1954
1955
6" AC
40 40

40.34 63.22

50.85 73.84

83.66 61.41

6.49 56.04
167.80
233.76
184.29 212.50
212.50
243.54 232.50
224.98
225.00
110.52 133.02 196.98
00 48.00
116.04
48 55.22

94.79 95.69

98.29 8 0
54 70

81.26 115.34
24 24644
24645

45.49 23.59
38'
WA
2043
2055

21.26 38
56 38
50 C.I.1928
6" ABANDON
12" A.C. SPEC. 13-187
8 12" A.C. CL. 150
6" C.I. 13-84 1928
10"
8" A.C 1964
6" A.C. 1964
SPEC. 13-58
12" A.C. 1966
12" A.C. CL. 200
ABANDON 6" C.I.
1982 12" A.C. CL. 150
12" A.C. CL. 200
6" C.I. 1961
6" C.I. 1928

ABANDON
10" DCM
SPEC.13-107
11 11
2053
2043
2056
2040
2052
24709
24703
24707
2011
24706
24713
24712
24711
1955
1966
1962
24703
1923
1917
1911
1903
1858
24718 24719
1861
24723
24725 24729
1945
2000
1901
1856
1948
24726
2034
24805
20322026202220162014
24809
24823
2005
24651
24645
1/2
24813
24819
1886
24647 24645
1/41/21/41/23/4
24640 24640
1/4
24640
1/2
24642 24642
1/2
24644
1947
24717
2039
2018
203020282024
2036 2038
24706
24712
24718

VIA KOSTA
19-01
19-02
19-03
19-04
19-05
19-06
19-07
19-08
19-09
19-10
19-11
19-12
19-13
19-14
19-15
19-16
19-17
19-18
19-19
19-20
19-21
19-22
19-23
19-24
19-25
19-26
19-27
24-03
24-02
24-04
24-05
24-07
14-12
14-11
24-18

MITA BLVD
19-28
ZONE I
ZONE I
Water Lines
Active Main
Abandoned
Lateral
&É Valve
"b Reducer
C"` Meter
G!. Hydrant
! Flushout
City Limit
Atlas Page
")19
19 14
24 18 20
25 15
23 13
Coordinate System:

NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS 0405 Feet
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: North American 1983
False Easting: 6,561,666.6667
False Northing: 1,640,416.6667
Central Meridian: -118.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 34.0333
Standard Parallel 2: 35.4667
Latitude Of Origin: 33.5000
Units: Foot US
See Map: 20
See Map: 14 15
Date: 7/11/2012
Author: mmcdaniel
See Map: 24
13 23 25
0 100
Feet
1:1,200
1 inch = 100 feet
See Map: 18
MAP
design smarter. build better.
300 S. Harbor Blvd.

Suite 814
Anaheim, CA 92805
(714) 533.3050
www.oe-eng.com

REQUEST FOR

PROPOSAL
CITY OF LOMITA | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | DESIGN SERVICES 24300 NARBONNE AVE. | LOMITA, CA U.S.A. 90717 | TELEPHONE: (310) 325-7110

ZONE G WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT

DESIGN SERVICES FOR
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
city of lomita

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Exhibit 3
The City of Lomita May 30th, 2023
Public Works Department
24300 Narbonne Ave.

Lomita, CA U.S.A. 90717
Subject: ZONE G WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
Onward Engineering (OE) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide Engineering and Design Services for the Zone G Water Main Replacement Project Project for the City of Lomita. We understand the importance of public works, especially on a project like this which has a large impact on the community. A firm that understands the human element and can incorporate safeguards into the design to ensure that construction proceeds smoothly with limited disruption is crucial. Additionally, you need a team that know what they are doing. Our design team has provided similar services on projects in the cities of Sierra Madre, Whittier, Torrance, Diamond Bar, Brea, La Habra Heights, West Covina, and Fullerton—to name a few, as well as on other design projects for the City of Lomita.

Our experienced proposed team of Project Engineers is led by Delfino “Chino” Consunji, PE, as the Project Manager.

Chino has 37 years of experience in providing Project Management and Engineering services. His experience includes being a Director of Public Works and City Engineer for the cities of Downey, West Covina, Brea, and Norwalk.

Justin Smeets, PE, PLS, QSD has 17 years of experience and will act as the Lead Project Engineer. He is supported by Ryan Dennis, P.Eng., Dayton Lowe, Riley Moore, EIT, David Loria, Jason To, Eric Urso, Henry Lu, and Leonard Phung, as our team of Project Engineers. Our team has worked together on a number of similar projects, allowing us to provide a seamless, confident, and familiar team dynamic. Our team also puts a great emphasis on QA/QC. Majdi Ataya, PE, a former City Engineer who understands the importance of meeting deadlines and maintaining high quality, will be the acting QA/QC Manager. Our PS&E submittals will go through three levels of review prior to each submittal which allows for error mitigation on separate levels of detail: ground level (drafting, calculations, and document formatting), project management level (design and project intent compliance), and quality assurance level (completeness of documents and checking that we have a set of “biddable” plans). By instituting this three-tiered approach, we check that plans are consistent, clear, correct, constructible, and complete (5 C’s). We are confident that our proven experience is an ample illustration to the City of our ability to complete this project on time, within budget, and at an elevated level of quality.

Onward Engineering confirms our ability to accept the terms of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) as indicated in the Sample Agreement without exception. Onward Engineering is also willing and able to provide the required insurance coverage noted in the Sample Agreement. I would like to thank the City of Lomita for the opportunity to submit our proposal. If you have any questions, or would like any additional information, please feel free to contact me at: (714) 533-3050, or by email at: [email protected].

We thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Lomita.

We acknowledge receipt of Addendum #1
Thank you,
Majdi Ataya, PE
President, Onward Engineering
design smarter. build better.
300 S. Harbor Blvd.

Suite 814
Anaheim, CA 92805
(714) 533.3050
www.oe-eng.com
SECTION 1: Cover Letter
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 1 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
Cover Letter 1

Onward Engineering
Onward Engineering
Majdi Ataya
President
300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 814, Anaheim, CA 92805

DAVID LORIA
AS: Computer Animation,
-Brooks College, Long Beach
CERTIFIED: AutoCAD Certified Professional
TECH: Civil 3D, Revit, 3D Max, Recap, Scan
Master point cloud processing software
Availability 50%
Current Workload: - Engineer on Whittier
-FY 22-23 Annual Pavement Rehab.
- Engineer on Glendale-2023-24 Pavement
Management Program Implementation Project.

JASON TO
BS: Civil Engineering, CSUF, Fullerton
SKILLS: AutoDesk/AutoCAD & ArcGIS/RAM
EXPERIENCE: Surveying/Soil Mechanics/
Reinforced Concrete &
Structural Steel Design
Availability 100%
NOORZAYGEO, INC.
maihan noor zay, ms, pe, ge
Principal Engineer
(951) 264-9023 | [email protected]
16817 Rainy Vale Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503
NoorzayGeo
Geotech Investigation & Testing
DELFINO “CHINO” CONSUNJI, PE
BS: Civil Engineering
pe: Professional Engineer, #57908
Former City Engineer/Director of Public
Works: Downey, West Covina, Brea, Norwalk

MAJDI ATAYA, PE
BS: Civil Engineering, CSULB, 1981
MPA: Full Coursework, CSULB, 1993
PE: Professional Engineer #39392
city of la habra:
(former) Deputy Director of Public Works
(former) City Engineer

JUSTIN SMEETS, PE,PLS,QSD
BS: Civil Engineering, CSUF, 2007
PE: Professional Engineer #78314
PLS: Professional Land Surveyor #9293
QSD: Qualified SWPPP Developer #00852
OCTA: (prior) CERTIFIED:

Pavement Condition Analysis

PROJECT ENGINEERS & SUB-CONSULTANTS

LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER
Pro
j
e
c
t or
ganization chart

QA/QC MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER

HENRY LU
BS: University of Transport,
-Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
DESIGN: Roadway/Drainage/Slope
Stability/Utility
CAD: AutoCAD/Civil3D
Availability 100%

LEONARD PHUNG
BS: University of Transport,
-Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
DESIGN: Roadway/Drainage/Slope Stability
CAD: AutoCAD/Civil3D/InfraWork
Availability 100%

RILEY MOORE, EIT
BS: Civil Engineering, CalPoly Pomona, 2020
AS: Architectural Design - OCC, 2016
EIT: Engineer-in-Training, #174122
TECH: AutoCAD, Civil 3D, MicroStation,
Revit, BlueBeam, & HDL
Availability 100%
100%
Available
40%
Available
60%
Available
Current Workload: CM for Norwalk Street
Rehab Project, finishes on June 12th.

Current Workload: - PM on Whittier-FY 22-23
Annual Pavement Rehab. - PM on Glendale-2023-24
Pavement Management Program Implementation Project.

RYAN DENNIS, P. ENG.

BS: Civil Engineering,
-University of Calgary, 2005
MINOR: Environmental Engineering,
-University of Calgary, 2005
p. eng.: Professional Engineer (Canada)
CAD: AutoCAD & Civil 3D
Availability 85%
Current Workload: - Engineer on Lake Forest
Phase 13-17 ADA Ramp Upgrades. - Engineer on
Lake Forest-Project 11 Trabuco Rd Improvements.

DAYTON LOWE
OCTA: (prior) CERTIFIED:

Pavement Assessment,
Rehabilitation & Recommendations
COURSES: Construction Management,
Technology, & Civil Engineering, -Broward College
CAD: AutoCAD & Civil 3D
Availability 80%
Current Workload: - Engineer on Long BeachDesign Build ADA Ramp Improvements.

C BELOW IMAGING POTHOLING
chris loera Chief Operating Officer
(310) 713-7711 | [email protected]
14280 Euclid Avenue, Chino, CA 91710
C-Below is 100% available, no open tasks
with Onward Engineering.

ERIC URSO Availability 100%
BS: Civil Engineering; The Citadel
-The Military College of South Carolina
MS: Geographic Information Science
-Cal State Long Beach
DESIGN: Survey CAD: AutoCAD/Civil 3D
SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 2 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
2Qualification and Experience

BACKGROUND
Majdi is the Principal-In-Charge of Ownard Engineering. Majdi Ataya, Professional Engineer and Former Deputy Director and City Engineer for the City of La Habra’s Public Works Department, is a seasoned engineer with over 41 years of solid and diversified experience in the public works sector. He is extremely familiar with the process of project management and design. He is a highly effective communicator and manager with an outstanding assimilation ability. Majdi is able to adapt and relate to all levels of management, and retain high energy levels and enthusiasm for the project at hand. Majdi understands the importance of excellent communication with public agencies and will be a dependable extension of your staff.

EXPERIENCE
walnut street, water & sewer main infrastru cture improvement project, whittier Majdi was the QA/QC Manager for the City of Whittier for the Walnut Street Water and Sewer Main Infrastructure Improvement Project. The proposed project limits included 3,000 feet of Walnut Street, from Pickering Avenue to Painter Avenue, which consisted of commercial buildings as well as single-family and multi-family residential developments. OE removed an existing 6-inch cast iron water main and a 6-inch VCP sewer main and replaced them with 12-inch and 10-inch mains, respectively. All laterals and intersecting mains were to be reconnected and sewer manholes reconstructed. The existing PCCroadway was to be replaced from curb to curb following the replacement of the water and sewer mains. Areas of sidewalks in disrepair were to be repaired, and ramps were to be retrofitted or reconstructed as needed to meet ADA requirements.

MASTER PLAN SEWER UPGRADES (PHASE V) CHERRY & ALDER STREET, BREA Majdi served as the QA/QC Manager to the City of Brea to ultimately upgrade 2,530 LF of sewer on Cherry and Alder and upgrade 1,100 LF of water line. The project limits fell within both the Cities of Brea and Fullerton right-of-way, requiring OE to coordinate with both throughout the project. Using CCTV video, the pipe’s interior revealed sagging, cracking, and deformation of the existing VCP sewer main.

The final design called for replacing the existing 8-inch sewer main with 12-inch VCP. Midway through the design, Fullerton requested extending the design by 1,050 LF within the City of Fullerton to the original 1,480 LF in Brea.

The scope was expanded a second time near the end of design to include upgrading 1,100 LF of 6-inch DCP to 8-inch DCP and replacing 27 water service connections. The OE design team coordinated with the City of Fullerton and the City of Brea as the scope expanded. The additional pipeline activated a Regional Water Quality Control Board requirement to complete an MS-4 Permit, including drafting a Non-Priority Project Water Quality Plan.

STREET, SEWER & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT TWO MOBILE HOME PARKS, LA HABRA Majdi served as the QA/QC Manager for the design of mobile park improvements at Park La Habra Mobile Homes and View Park Mobile Estates both in the City of La Habra. The work entailed a drainage study, drainage improvements, comprehensive CCTV inspection of both parks’ sewer systems, installation of sewer manholes at strategic locations for ease of maintenance, replacement of damaged sewer laterals to eliminate leaking and infiltration, street rehabilitation, replacement of deteriorated and undersized water mains, fire hydrants, and relocation of water services to the front of the individual units at both trailer parks.

ROADWAY
staff resumes

WATER MAIN
MAJDI ATAYA, pE

QA/QC MANAGER
fields of expert ise:

Exper
41 ience DRAINAGE
Years of

WATER SEWER
anaheim off ice
SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 3 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
PROJECT manager anaheim off ice

BACKGROUND
Delfino “Chino” Consunji is an experienced professional engineer specializing in the design, construction, project management and inspection of buildings, private development and public works projects.

Chino’s experience includes working for engineering consultants, contractors, developers, construction management firms and municipal agencies. He has served as City Engineer for the Cities of La Habra, Norwalk, Brea, West Covina and Downey and as Public Works Director for West Covina and Downey. He has managed the design and construction of over 500 projects with a total contract amount of more than $500 million over the last 37 years. These projects included arterial highways and residential streets rehabilitation; intersection widening improvements; traffic signal upgrades and safety enhancements; water, sewer storm drain and NPDES improvements; building and facility improvements; and park improvement projects. Chino is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California.

EXPERIENCE
Midbury Tract Street and Water Main Improvements, brea
As Deputy Director/City Engineer, Chino managed the design, construction and inspection of the Midbury Tract Streets and Water Main Improvements. The project rehabilitated the existing asphalt pavement on five residential streets in the Midbur y Tract consisting of Midbur y Street, Alwick Place, Wesham Place and portions of Sandalwood Drive and North Puente Street. The project also replaced damaged and/or uplifted concrete sidewalks, curb and gutter and driveway approaches and reconstructed curb access ramps in order to comply with ADA requirements. Finally. the project replaced approximately 1,500 linear of cast iron water mains with ductile iron pipe on Midbury Street, Alwick Place and Wesham Place. The total cost of the project was $500,000 with funding coming from Midbury Tract Assessment District.

Elm Street Rehabilitat ion and Water System Improvements, brea As Deputy Director/City Engineer, Chino managed the design, construction and inspection of the Elm Street Rehabilitation and Water System Improvements. This project rehabilitated approximately 4,100 linear feet of existing asphalt pavement on Elm Street from Brea Boulevard to State College Boulevard, removed and replaced damaged and/or uplifted concrete sidewalks, curb and gutter and driveway approaches, and reconstructed curb access ramps in order to meet ADA requirements. This project also replaced approximately 2.5 miles of deteriorated and undersized 6-inch water mains with 8-inch water mains, gate valves, water meters and services, fire hydrants, pressure regulating stations and appurtenances. The total cost of the project was $3 million with funding coming from Gas Tax, Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds.

Birch Street Water Main Replacement Project, brea
As Deputy Director/City Engineer, Chino managed the design, construction and inspection of the Birch Street Water Main Replacement Project. This project removed the existing 12-inch water mains on the north side of Birch Street from Flowerhill Street to Valencia Avenue and replaced with new 12-inch water mains. The relocation of the existing water mains was necessary as part of the widening of Birch Street in front of Brea Sports Park. The project also installed ne gate valves, water meters and services, fire hydrants, pressure regulating stations and appurtenances. The total cost of the project was $500,000 with funding coming from Water Enterprise Funds. delfino “chino” consunji
fields of expert ise:

Experience Years
37 of

WATER MAIN WATER SEWER DRAINAGE ADA RAMP
SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 4 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project

BACKGROUND
Justin wields 17 years of experience involving civil engineering design, municipal engineering and facilities design, construction management and construction administration. Using AutoCAD Civil 3D, Justin handles the management and development of engineering plans and specifications and mapping. Justin additionally handles land development and grading design projects, conducted earthwork calculations, and incorporates typical designs. He is proficient in federally funded projects as well, and familiar with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Justin has successfully taken multiple projects from the initial federal funding application, to the Preliminary Environmental Study, to E-76 approval, and all the way through construction of audited federally funded construction projects. He has experience managing construction projects and handles planning and running kickoff meetings with the contractor, reviewing project submittals, RFIs, CCOs, and checking contractor invoices against field quantities. Justin ensures to coordinate the daily construction details with the contractor and inspector. He has completed multiple SWPPPs and erosion and sediment control plans per the latest Construction General Permit.

EXPERIENCE
247TH STREET AREA WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT, LOMITA
Justin was the Project Manager on this project to provide design services for the 247th Street Area Water Main Replacement Project. The existing 4-inch/6-inch water main system was constructed between 1928 and 1930 and had exceeded its useful service life. The project area included Western Avenue from 246th St. to Lomita Blvd, on Lomita Blvd. from Western Avenue to Lot 1728, on 246th St. from Western Avenue to Lot 1748, on 247th St. from Western Avenue to Lot 1748, on 247th Place from Western Avenue to Lot 1746, and on 248th St. from Western Avenue to Lot 1746. To provide improved flow, pressure, and fire protection, installing approximately 3,300 linear feet of new 8-inch PVC water mains was needed. The project had a construction budget of $1.1 million dollars and was funded by local monies along with FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funds. The work was done on an expedited 4 month schedule, and a Caltrans Encroachment Permit along with a City of Los Angeles Permit had to be obtained.

CAMERON AVENUE SEWER MAIN REHABILITATION, WEST COVINA
Justin was the Project Manager for the City of West Covina on the Cameron Avenue Sewer Main Rehabilitation Project.

This project upgraded the sewer main on Cameron Avenue between Citrus Street and 750 feet east of Inman Road.

The improvements, classified High Priority by the City’s Sewer System Management Plan, entailed upsizing the 10-inch sewer main to a 15-inch vitrified clay pipe using the pipe bursting method. Six manholes and approximately 27 laterals were part of the project, and alignment of the sewer was about 10 feet south of the centerline.

The sewer main was connected to a 10-inch Los Angeles County line about 200 feet west of Citrus Avenue.

OE contacted the County to recommend its upgrade so all work could be done at once.

CALIFORNIA WATER DOMESTIC PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS, LA HABRA Justin was the Project Manager on this project to provide the City of La Habra with design engineering services on the California Water Domestic Pipeline Improvements Project. The City of La Habra annexed a portion of the County of Orange Water Mains in the City. The existing water mains were found to be deficient and needed to be upgraded to C900 HDPE pipe. The project spanned over 14,000 linear feet and included water mains varying in size from 6” to 12”, new hydrants, new meters and some new services to the house. The project included new water mains in a new alignment in order to keep the existing main functioning during construction.

WATER MAIN
JUSTIN SMEETS, pE, PLS, QSD

LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER
fields of expert ise:

Experience DRAINAGE
Years
17 of

WATER SEWER ADA RAMP
anaheim off ice
SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 5 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
SUB-Consultants
Chris Loera

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER / PROJECT MANAGER
qualifications
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION: East Los Angeles Skills Center REGISTERED LEVEL III: Ground Penetrating Radar Technician | REGISTERED LEVEL III: Utility Locator about
Chris Loera plans, organizes, directs and controls the activities of the Operations Department at C Below. He is responsible for the performance of all department functions including Research and Development, Material Management, Order Services and Engineering and Surveying. He is knowledgeable and experienced with Auto CAD, Civil 3D, SolidWorks 3D, Micro Station, InRoads Suite, and Service CEO industry software, along with many others. He has worked directly on many POLB and POLA projects, and with over 15 years of experience in the industry, Chris is proposed as a well qualified locating quality assurance specialist.
experience

NORTH SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
The City of beverly hills
The Santa Monica Boulevard Reconstruction Project was approved by the City Council to involve design reconstruction to the roadway and upgrading the century-old drainage system. C Below was contracted to clear and mark out existing utilities for multiple utility upgrade alignments in the road. The crews worked on the street, performing their own Traffic Control during rush hour traffic and weekends to complete the investigation and to accommodate the Cities’ traffic congestion. Over 120 pothole locations were performed, including the potholing of ramp footings that were excavated during the reconstruction. C Below’s CCTV crews also used the robotic camera to video approximately 1,260 linear ft. of storm drain lines in multiple locations. C Below’s final reporting was sent to our client in the form of a CCTV video report, and detailed pothole report. This was a large and complex project that was completed quickly in 1 month.

Maihan Noorzay, MS, PE, GE, QSD, QSP

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
qualifications
BS: Civil Engineering - UC Irvine, 2007 | MS: Civil Engineering - Cal Poly Pomona, 2014 | PE: Registered Civil Engineer - #C77901 | GE: Geotechnical Engineer - #3085 | QSD/QSP: Qualified SWPPP #23878 bio
Maihan has over 15 years of experience on projects that included roadways, bridge and parking structures, freeway widenings, and landfills. His tasks on these projects involved project plans and specifications review to verify consistency with the soils report, review of daily field reports and laboratory test results to verify the accuracy of the project plans and specifications, and technical and budget oversight during construction. His field experience includes field observations, monitoring, and testing of grading operations that included fill and backfill placement, subgrade preparations for foundations and pavements including overexcavation requirement verification, in-situ BAT permeameter testing, rammed aggregate pier installation quality assurance, forensic distress inspections, Cast-In-Drilled-Hole (CIDH) borehole logging and quality assurance, and oversight of investigation drilling operations. Maihan has also completed hundreds of soils reports for various conventional structures including implementation of subsurface exploration programs, assignment of laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and final report preparation. He has laboratory management experience performing characterization and construction soils test. experience

GREEN TREE BOULEVARD TO YATES ROAD EXTENSION PROJECT
The City of VICTORVILLE
Maihan prepared the Materials Report for Green Tree Boulevard to Yates Road Extension Project in Victorville, California. The project extended from 500 feet west of Green Tree Boulevard from its intersection with Hesperia Road and continued east over the BNSF railroad tracks to merge with Ridgecrest Road and Yates Road. At the western limit, the alignment also included a portion of Hesperia Road from approximately 400 feet north of its intersection with Green Tree Boulevard to Coad Road to the south. At the eastern limit, the project alignment split and continued onto Yates Road, heading north to its intersection with Park Road and extending south on Ridgecrest Road to approximately 1,000 feet south of Chinquapin Drive. The project scope of services included reviewing available reports prepared by project personnel, a field investigation and associated laboratory testing, engineering analysis and preparation of the Materials Report suitable for submission to Caltrans.

NoorzayGeo
SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 6 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
The City of
Lomita
247th Street Area Water Main Repla cement

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start: 2021
End: Current
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided design services for the 247th Street Area Water Main Replacement Project. The existing 4-inch/6-inch water main system was constructed between 1928 and 1930 and had exceeded its useful service life. The project area included Western Avenue from 246th St. to Lomita Blvd, on Lomita Blvd. from Western Avenue to Lot 1728, on 246th St. from Western Avenue to Lot 1748, on 247th St. from Western Avenue to Lot 1748, on 247th Place from Western Avenue to Lot 1746, and on 248th St. from Western Avenue to Lot 1746. To provide improved flow, pressure, and fire protection, installing approximately 3,300 linear feet of new 8-inch PVC water mains was needed. The project had a construction budget of $1.8 million dollars and was funded by local funds along with FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funds.

The work was done on an expedited 4 month schedule, and a Caltrans Encroachment Permit along with a City of Los Angeles Permit had to be obtained.

Brian Jones, Water & Sewer Manager | (562) 383-4170 | [email protected] 621 W Lambert Rd, La Habra, CA 90631
The City of
la habra

CALIFORNIA WATER DOMESTIC PIPELINE IMPROVEMENTS

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start: 2021
End: Current
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu NoorzayGeo
OE provided the City of La Habra with design engineering services on the California Water Domestic Pipeline Improvements Project. The City of La Habra annexed a portion of the County of Orange Water Mains in the City.

The existing water mains were found to be deficient and needed to be upgraded to C900 HDPE pipe. The project spanned over 14,000 linear feet and included water mains varying in size from 6” to 12”, new hydrants, new meters and new services to select residences. The water mains was constructed in a new alignment in order to keep the existing main functioning during construction. The project had a construction estimate of $4.1 million dollars.

Mirela Grigorescu, Engineering Assistant II | (909) 384-5202 | [email protected] 201 North E Street, 2nd Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92401 The City of
san bernardino
Mt. Vernon Storm Drain Project, San Bernard ino

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start: 2021
End: Current
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu NoorzayGeo
OE provided design engineering services for the City of San Bernardino on the Mt. Vernon Storm Drain Project.

The project consists of constructing approximately 2,700 linear feet (0.51 miles) of storm drain pipe along Mt.

Vernon Avenue. This was between existing manholes at the 16th Street and Cajon Boulevard intersections that also required replacement. OE conducted a hydrology/hydraulic analysis to verify if a 48-inch diameter storm drain pipe was sufficient in handling future storm events, as per the City’s Storm Drain Plan recommendations. Additional work included the reconstruction of an existing concrete island that intersected the path of the storm drain pipe, reconstructing 15 curb returns and 45 driveways to ADA required standards, a geotechnical investigation, and a pavement analysis and rehabilitation of 140,000 SF of asphalt pavement. Legal descriptions and plats were also required for Temporary Construction Easements that were needed for private parcel improvements. The project had a construction estimate of $2.9 million dollars.

FIRM LIST OF PROJECTS
SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 7 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
Maliha Ansari, Principal Civil Engineer | (626) 914-8294 | [email protected] 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, CA 91741
The City of
Glendora
Bennett, Wash ington, Westr idge & Bender Avenues Cul -De-Sacs Project

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start: 2021
End: 2022
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu NoorzayGeo
OE provided engineering design services on the Bennett Avenue, Washington Avenue, Westridge Avenue and Bender Avenue Cul-De-Sacs Project for the City of Glendora. This included the design of nearly 7,000 LF of new 8-inch ductile iron/C909 PVC water mains to improve flow, pressure and fire protection, along with 311,000 SF of streets requiring improvements. Other work included a striping enhancement concept to incorporate marked Class II bike lanes, repurposing crosswalk warning lights, reconstructing and replacing 16 ADA curb ramps for compliance, traffic signal inductive loop replacement, and water main appurtenance installation and replacement. A section of pipeline located at Bennett Avenue near Valencia Street passes beneath a storm drain, requiring directional drilling to facilitate new water main installation through the area. This was accompanied by assessments of fire hydrants, air and vacuum release valves, and water meters and services laterals. This project had a construction estimate of $5 million dollars.

David Grantham, PE, Public Works Engineer | (714) 738-6853 | [email protected] 303 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, CA. 92832
The City of
fullerton
Euclid Roadway & Sewer Reconstru ction

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start: 2019
End: 2020
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided Design Engineering services to the City of Fullerton on the Euclid Roadway and Sewer Reconstruction from Williamson to Fern Project. The project consisted of reconstructing or resurfacing approximately 3,700 linear feet of arterial streets between Fern Drive and Williamson Avenue and replacing approximately 1,700 feet of sewer mains between Malvern Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. The sewer work included removing the existing 10-inch VCP and replacing it with new 12-inch VCP pipe between Commonwealth and Malvern and removing and replacing sewer north of Malvern to the end of the street project limits at Fern without upsizing. The worked also included removing the manholes at the center of the Euclid Street/Chapman Avenue intersection and establishing a new connection point approximately 50 feet to the east along Chapman Avenue as well as reconstructing the double barrel siphon and adjusting invert elevations to achieve a suitable slope. The design utilized a trenchless method to install the siphon beneath the OCPW Brea Creek Channel. Additional tasks included adjusting manhole elevations and reconnected service laterals, constructing new curb and gutter where gutter is absent, constructing 9 ADA compliant curb ramps, and repairing curb, gutter, cross gutters, sidewalks and driveways where required. The City utilized SB1 funds for the road rehabilitation and local funds for the sewer improvements. The project had a construction estimate of $3 million dollars.

Raymond Contreras, Project Manager | (714) 990-7763 | [email protected] 1 Civic and Cultural Center, Brea, CA 92821
The City of
brea
cherry & alder water & sewer main upgrades

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start & End:
2017
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided to the City of Brea with Design Engineering services to ultimately upgrade 2,530 LF of sewer on Cherry and Alder and upgrade 1,100 LF of water line. The project limits fell within both the Cities of Brea and Fullerton right-of-way, requiring OE to coordinate with both throughout the project. Using CCTV video, the pipe’s interior revealed sagging, cracking, and deformation of the existing VCP sewer main. The final design called for replacing the existing 8-inch sewer main with 12-inch VCP. Midway through the design, Fullerton requested extending the design by 1,050 LF within the City of Fullerton to the original 1,480 LF in Brea. The scope was expanded a second time near the end of design to include upgrading 1,100 LF of 6-inch DCP to 8-inch DCP and replacing 27 water service connections.

The OE design team coordinated with the City of Fullerton and the City of Brea as the scope expanded. The additional pipeline activated a Regional Water Quality Control Board requirement to complete an MS-4 Permit, including drafting a Non-Priority Project Water Quality Plan.

SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
| 8 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
Carl Hassel, PE, Capital Projects Administrator | (562)567-9302 | [email protected] 13230 Penn Street, Whittier, CA 90602
The City of
whittier
walnut street & sewer main improvements

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start & End:
2018
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided full Design Engineering services for the City of Whittier for the Walnut Street Water and Sewer Main Improvement Project. The proposed project limits included 3,000 feet of Walnut Street from Pickering Avenue to Painter Avenue, consisting of commercial buildings as well as single-family and multi-family residential developments.

OE removed an existing 6-inch cast iron water main and a 6-inch VCP sewer main and replaced them with 12-inch and 10-inch mains, respectively. All laterals and intersecting mains were to be reconnected and sewer manholes reconstructed. The existing plain cement concrete (PCC) roadway was to be replaced from curb to curb following the replacement of the water and sewer mains. Areas of sidewalks in disrepair were to be repaired, and ramps were to be retrofitted or reconstructed as needed to meet ADA requirements.

Monica Heredia,PE , Deputy Director/City Engineer (now in Pico Rivera) | (562) 801-4965 [email protected] | 6615 Passons Boulevard, Pico Rivera, CA 90660 The City of
west covina
Cameron Avenue Sewer Main Rehabilitation Project

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start & End:
2018
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided to the City of West Covina with Design Services on the Cameron Avenue Sewer Main Rehabilitation Project.

This project upgraded the sewer main on Cameron Avenue between Citrus Street and 750 feet east of Inman Road. The improvements, classified High Priority by the City’s Sewer System Management Plan, entailed upsizing the 10-inch sewer main to a 15-inch vitrified clay pipe using the pipe bursting method. Six manholes and approximately 27 laterals were part of the project, and alignment of the sewer was about 10 feet south of the centerline. The sewer main was connected to a 10-inch Los Angeles County line about 200 feet west of Citrus Avenue. OE contacted the County to recommend expediting its upgrade so all work could be done at once. The project had a construction estimate of $1 million dollars.

Christopher Johansen, City Engineer | (562) 905-9721 | [email protected] 201 E. La Habra Boulvard, La Habra, CA 90631
The City of
La Habra
hACiENDA DR. WATER MAiN RECONSTRUCTiON

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start: 2017
End: 2018
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided design engineering services to the City of La Habra for this 800-foot-long, 8-inch water main. The scope of work included realigning the new water main to keep the existing water main in service. The proposed water main was upgraded from an old, corroded 6-inch ductile iron to an 8-inch HDPE pipe. OE designed the layout for the new water main, valve locations, and tie-ins to best keep the existing water main in operation for the residents it services. OE also designed the reconstruction of the existing pavement surface. This project was an emergency repair project, and OE met the City’s expedited schedule to complete the project before additional issues arose.

Chris Cimino, Director Public Works | (626) 355-7135 x801 | [email protected] 232 West Sierra Madre Blvd., Sierra Madre, CA 91024
The City of
sierra madr e
water main repla cement - phase II

DATE OF PERFORMANCE
Start & End:
2018
project
team
Majdi Ataya Justin Smeets Ryan Dennis Dayton Lowe David Loria Riley Moore Jason To Leonard Phung Henry Lu OE provided the City of Sierra Madre with Design Engineering services. The purpose of the project was to replace 18 segments of existing 2-inch to 6-inch steel water mains with ductile iron pipe. The pipes were to be installed in parallel trenches to the existing pipes to minimize road reconstruction requirements and ensure that the trench limits encompass the existing roadway patches from previous repairs. Additionally, fire hydrants, service laterals, valves, blow-offs, air release valves, and other water appurtenances needed to be reconnected, repurposed, or newly installed as necessary. The project included approximately 13,495 linear feet of water mains to be replaced. The water mains are located primarily within residential land use zones. The project had a construction estimate of $1.9 million dollars.

SECTION 2: Qualification and Experience
| 9 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
project understanding
The City of Lomita is seeking a qualified firm to provide professional engineering services for the Zone G Water Main Replacement Project.

Zone G has 4-inch, 6-inch, and 8-inch water mains built in 1928 which have exceeded their useful life.

The purpose of the project is to abandon in place the existing water mains and install approximately 3,700 linear feet (0.7 miles) of new PVC water mains and associated appurtenances along Zone G streets in two phases including Phase 1 – Ebony Lane and Phase 2 Walnut Street and 247th Place, in accordance with the 2022 Water Master Plan.

Water main improvements will be completed in conjunction with the Zone G Street Construction Project. lomita blvd
western
ave
Lomita
legend
Project Site
phase 2
secondary RD
phase 1
Main rd
phase 1
phase 2
Project limits
walnut st
Project limits
ebony ln
Project limits
247th pl
site Map ZONE G - WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT Locations
Trench backfilling.

Water main replacement.

Service lateral reconnection.
design compon ents
Signing and striping replacement.

Fire hydrant replacement.

Miscellaneous water main appurtenance replacement.

Utility appurtenance
adjustments/relocations/
replacements.

City milestones
Notice to Proceed – July 5, 2023
City Required Design Completion – March 2023 (8 months from Notice to Proceed) 1 2
3 Anticipated Design Completion – December 2023
SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 10 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
3Scope of Work and Project Approach
project APPROACH
Communication and Public Outreach
Commencement of the project will result in unavoidable disruption to residences, businesses, and traffic within the areas of construction. Early and effective communication with affected citizens, stakeholders, and the City will be imperative to the successful completion of the project.

OE has at its disposal several public outreach and administrative services including project hotlines and collaborative scheduling/communication software that the City may utilize to improve communication with the community, maintain a positive public perception of the project, and enhance communication between OE and the City as the project progresses.

Site Evaluation
Project success will be achieved in part by collecting sufficient data to formulate an accurate model of the existing site conditions. Once base maps have been prepared, a detailed visual inspection of the site including visual observations and measurements (i.e. manhole invert elevations) will be conducted and a review of available documentation will be undertaken to begin the initial development of the engineering design and potential alternatives. The findings of this detailed assessment will be used to identify the optimal design for the water main construction via a cost-benefit analysis.
project wor kflow
RECORDS RESEARCH - Review available as-built records as well as other data available from third-party sources to assist in the preparation of the engineering design and construction plans.

Utility Resear ch - Identify all existing above ground and underground utilities and verify pertinent utility data (i.e. location, size, depth, type, etc.). Notify all utility owners of planned construction and modify, relocate, or protect in place all utilities.

Geotechnical Investigation (Optional) - Conduct a geotechnical investigation to verify the existing structural sections and subgrade soil conditions and provide recommendations for trench backfilling.

Topographic Survey (Optional) - Conduct a topographic survey to document existing site features and elevations to facilitate the development of the base map.

Site Evaluation - Conduct a site evaluation to document the condition of existing infrastructure and verify utility appurtenance locations. Identify design constraints based on site conditions.

Utility Pothol ing (Optional) - Conduct utility potholing to verify utility locations and depths and ensure there are no conflicts within the proposed water main alignments.

Third Party Coord inat ion - Coordinate with Caltrans and the City of Los Angeles to secure necessary approvals or encroachment permits for traffic control setups.

Plans, Specifications, Estimates (PS&E) - Develop PS&E that include water main construction, trench repairs, service lateral replacement, fire hydrant replacement, miscellaneous water appurtenance replacement, concrete infrastructure repairs, traffic control, utility appurtenance adjustments/relocation, and signing and striping replacement.

PS&E QA/QC - Check plans, specifications, and estimates for accuracy and adherence to applicable state and federal standards.

Bid and Constru ction Support - Provide the necessary support to the City to execute the Bid and Construction Phases of the project.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Project Funding
Water Capital Fund (Partial Funding).

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 11 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
Drone Mapping
The site assessment will be enhanced with the collection of high-resolution aerial photographs of the street using our drone. Our team has four remote pilots licensed by the FAA to fly drones for commercial use. The aerial photographs can be used in lieu of a topographic survey to prepare base maps when vertical profiles are not required as they provide us with highly detailed reference data that cannot be achieved through traditional site evaluation methods, which allows us to accurately document existing pavement distress, site surface features, utility notification markings, and street striping. Additionally, the images collected are at a higher resolution than images provided by other sources and are ideal for use in the preparation of exhibits. The image below, collected for a previous project, demonstrates the level of detailed information that can be collected using drone technology. The aerial photos collected are merged into a composite image in post-processing to create complete street segments with very high levels of detail.

ADA RAMP DETAIL ASPHALT CRACKING
Project Integration
There are currently two other projects with work areas that overlap or connect to the Zone G Water Main project, including the 247th Street Area Water Main Project and the Zone G Street Construction Project. The 247th Street Area Water Main Project includes installation of new water mains on 247th Place from the limits of the Zone G Water Main Project east towards the Western Avenue frontage road, then south to Lomita. The Zone G Street Construction Project includes rehabilitation of the pavement that will be overlaying the new Zone G water mains.

The Zone G water main plans will show the proposed improvements on 247th Place connecting to the new water mains extending east to Western Avenue. Additionally, notes will be provided on the plans related to the Zone G Street Construction Project including street closures and construction notices to the customers.

Third Party Approvals/Encroachment Permits
Although all proposed construction is located within the City of Lomita right-of-way, it is anticipated that traffic control setups may encroach into the City of Los Angeles and/or Caltrans right-of-ways during construction on 247th Place and Ebony Lane. Based on our previous experience, it is anticipated that Caltrans will require submittal and review of the traffic control plans to issue an encroachment permit. OE contacted the City of Los Angeles and confirmed that application for an encroachment permit would not be necessary; however, a review of the traffic control plans by the Los Angeles Department of Transportation would be required.

If it is determined that the Zone G Street Construction Project will also require approvals/encroachment permits for the same work areas, OE will work with the City to determine if the projects can be submitted as a single package and utilize the same permits.

Any additional work required to secure permits within third party right-of-ways is above and beyond the intended scope. A supplementary cost estimate at the included hourly rates can be provided for additional permit acquisition services if requested by the City.

Water Main Installation
The water main alignment will be designed to maintain a minimum separation distance of 10 feet from underground utilities that present a source of potential contamination to the water source (i.e. sanitary sewer). In the event that this separation can’t be met due to site restrictions, an alternative design may be specified which may include utilizing alternative material (i.e. SDR-14 pipe) or encasing the pipe.

Minimizing downtime for affected users is critical for water main replacement projects. If the design allows, the proposed water mains can be installed parallel to the existing mains while keeping the old lines in service.

Once the new mains are installed, pressure tested and disinfected, they can then be connected into the system.

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 12 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
Once the new mains are connected to the water system the water services will be individually switched over so that the only downtime experienced will be the brief time between disconnecting the old services and connecting the new services. OE’s online map service can be utilized to help inform residents of the exact day when they will be affected.

If utility research identifies a significant number of utilities within the vicinity of the proposed water main alignments, a recommendation may be made to remove the existing water mains and install the new mains in the same alignment. Typically, this method will increase downtime for the water users; however, as long as the existing valves are sufficient, construction can be phased in such a manner that downtime will be minimal and coincide with off-peak water usage times.

All fire hydrants, service laterals, valves, blow-offs, air release valves, and other associated water appurtenances will be assessed for adherence to current design and regulatory standards and condition. New appurtenances will be installed where necessary; however, efforts will be made to reconnect or repurpose components wherever possible. All water main designs and trench backfilling will conform to the City of Lomita Standard Drawings.

It was noted that the water main as-built maps provided in the addendum indicate that the water main replacement on 247th Place will extend underneath the private parcels at the end of the cul-de-sac and connect to Walnut Street. If the City intends to extend the water main to Walnut Street, directional drilling will be required; however, the section of new water main to be installed on the eastern portion of 247th Place as part of the 247th Street Area Water Main Project will provide water to the western portion of the street once connected. It is therefore recommended that the section of existing water main beneath the private parcels be disconnected from the system and abandoned in place. The single service lateral connected to that section of pipe can be reconnected to the water main on Walnut Street.

Alternative Pipeline Materials
In addition to industry standard construction methods, OE can assess the potential benefits of incorporating other technologies into the design at the City’s request. One such technology is Molecularly Oriented Polyvinyl Chloride Pressure Pipe (PVCO).
• Maintains desired features of PVC including resistance to corrosion and ease of installation. • Better impact resistance and increased tensile strength compared to PVC. • Up to 75%+ weight reduction compared to ductile iron pipe. • Up to 40%+ weight reduction compared to PVC.
• Larger internal diameters resulting in increased flow rates and reduced pumping costs. • Reduced surge pressure.
• Conforms with ASTM, AWWA, and ANSI/NSF standards.

Street Rehabilitation
Any sections of pavement removed during construction activities will be reconstructed to match the existing pavement structural section in accordance with the City Standard Drawings Trench Detail. All striping removed during trenching will be replaced to match existing and all manholes and valves will be adjusted as necessary w 247th pL
walnut
st.

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 13 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
to match the grade of the replaced pavement. If feasible, the plans will instruct the contractor to construct the surface course of the water main trench pavement along with the rest of the pavement rehabilitation completed during the Zone G Street Construction Project to reduce construction costs.

Concrete Infrastructure Repairs
Concrete infrastructure repairs will be limited to the replacement of curb, gutter, and sidewalk disturbed due to the water main replacement, service lateral reconnection, and other water main appurtenance replacement activities. Replaced concrete infrastructure will be constructed in compliance with ADA standards and maintain drainage patterns. If feasible, concrete infrastructure repairs will be incorporated into the Zone G Street Construction Project to reduce construction costs.
value engineering
cost saving measures
The following cost saving measures can be incorporated into the scope of work:

Drone Mapping in Lieu of Survey
Since the plan set primarily consists of horizontal design, the aerial photographs collected by the drone can be used in lieu of the topographic survey to prepare the base maps.

Water Main Engineering
OE will assess the feasibility of utilizing PVCO pipe or other materials/methods to reduce construction costs, reduce maintenance costs, and/or extend the service life of the water mains.

Project Integration
Include instructions in plans and specifications to incorporate street restoration activities following water main installation into the Zone G Street Construction Project to eliminate redundant construction costs. Additionally, combine project scopes when seeking approvals/encroachment permits where project limits overlap.

Lessons Learned
The following is a description of some lessons learned on other projects of similar scope that can be applied to this project to improve efficiencies:

Recurrent Project Meet ings
It is recommended that progress meetings be conducted every two weeks or twice monthly between the City PM, OE’s PM, and OE’s Design Engineer. These approximately 30-minute meetings conducted via video conference or telephone allows Onward to give the City a brief update on the progress of the project and to discuss new design approaches and challenges. This continuous engagement assists in keeping the project on track to meet milestones and reduces the amount of time the City needs to spend reviewing the PS&E as many of their comments and concerns will have already been addressed.

Base Map Accuracy
To ensure that the base maps are accurate and complete, the site evaluation will be conducted once the topographic survey data and utility as-built information has been incorporated into the base maps to verify that utility appurtenance locations and ownership are portrayed correctly.

Third Party Communication
Early and continuous communication with third parties will be critical to minimize delays to the project schedule.

OE will identify key personnel within organizations and provide complete design plans as early as feasible to minimize review cycles.

Adherence to Budget
Significant changes to the design can be costly and delay milestones, particularly on larger scale projects. Therefore, the budget will be strictly adhered to throughout the design phase and all construction items will be quantified as accurately as possible early in the design process to prevent scope creep.

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 14 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project

SCOPE OF WORK
Our corporate culture thrives on innovation, and we are dedicated to keeping up with industry standards and new technologies. OE provides ingenuity in its engineering solutions. As a company, we feel it is important to base our goals and objectives on a solid foundation of good corporate ethics. The following is our scope of work for design engineering services integrated with the site-specific tasks outlined in the City’s Request for Proposal, to which no exceptions are taken.

Preliminary Research Phase

1.1 / 1.2 / 1.3 | Meetings: Kick-Off, Bi-Weekly Progr ess, Plan Check - Meeting Minutes and Agenda (digital copy)
- Project Schedule (digital copy - to be updated as necessary) OE will set up a design kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss the scope of work, objectives, design criteria, technical requirements, and project schedule. Up to 8 bi-weekly progress meetings will be coordinated with the City to discuss design challenges and project status. Plan check meetings will be arranged following the City’s review of the 60% and 90% PS&E submittals.

1.4 | Research and Review Available Data
- Existing Records Matrix (digital copy)
- Copies of Existing Records (digital copies)
The OE team will compile and review all records and documents from the City. Existing documentation research that will be reviewed includes County, City, utility, and other pertinent records and documents, existing street, signal, storm drain, gas, sewer, and water main improvement plans, record drawings, third-party utility plans, topographic data maps, survey centerline and private property monument data, and other important information. All records will be compiled and returned to the City upon project completion. OE will conduct existing records research and coordination with utilities in the area and all design work will be coordinated with the affected utilities.

1.5 | Utility Research and Notification
- Utility contact matrix (digital copy)
- First, second and final utility notices, utility notification log, and correspondence to each utility owner (digital copies) OE will conduct a detailed local utility investigation to confirm the most recent contacts for all affected utilities and cross-reference the findings with any information provided by the City. Each company will be initially contacted via letter to inform them of the upcoming project and request information pertaining to their utilities such as verification of the sizes, depths, and locations of their underground lines, facilities, and substructures within the project vicinity. Once the requested information is received from the utility owners, OE will cross-check the plotted locations with field review information to ensure the existing utility lines are shown in their proper locations. The compiled information will be integrated into the 60% construction plans and provided to all affected utility owners with the second utility notification letter. OE will ensure that the final design is compatible with all utilities to be installed, relocated, adjusted, or otherwise modified within the project area and a final utility notification letter containing the final construction plans will be sent to all affected utility owners. OE will meet as many times as necessary with the affected utility owners throughout the development of the plans to coordinate any relocation of the utilities required.

1.6 | Drone Mapping
- Aerial photographs (digital copies)
We believe that a topographic survey would be prudent on this project, but have included it as an optional item in our fee per the City’s request. If after discussion with the City it is decided not to include it, then aerial photographs will be taken of the project streets in lieu of a topographic survey to prepare base maps and horizontal designs.

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 15 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
Preliminary Design Phase

2.1 | Base Maps
- Street, Right-of-Way, and Utility Base Maps (digital copies) The base maps will be prepared through the compilation of the research records, topographic survey data (if available), aerial photographs, site visit findings, and underground utility line records obtained from as-built plans provided by utility companies. All plans will be developed using the latest AutoCAD Civil 3D software at 1” = 20’ scale using conventional line styles. Each design element will be stored on a separate layer.

2.2 | Site Evaluation
- Site Evaluation Notes and Photos (digital copies)
OE will schedule a site inspection and evaluation following the completion of the base maps. OE will verify records drawings, confirm base map accuracy, assess site conditions, and identify and inventory infrastructure deficiencies and potential design conflicts. Aerial photographs will be taken of all streets using OE’s drone to document site features including street, curb, and sidewalk configurations, pavement conditions and digout locations, utility appurtenance locations, and striping. OE will also prepare a photo log of key project areas.

2.3 | 60% PS&E
- 60% Plans (digital copy and 2 hard copies – 24” x 36” format on bond paper) - 60% Cost Estimate (digital copy and 2 hard copies)
- 60% Specifications (digital copy and 2 hard copies)
- Submittal review comments/responses and red-lined plans (digital copies – PDF format)

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
OE will maintain continuous communication with the City Project Manager to provide status updates, schedule progress meetings, and discuss design approaches and complications. Progress meetings and schedule updates will be conducted up to 8 times unless requested otherwise by the City.

PLANS
Once the Preliminary Research Phase has been completed, OE will develop the plans to make a submission at 60% completion. Our design team will begin to populate the plan set with the necessary plan information and coordinate with adjacent agencies or utilities and submit the plans for their review or approval. Feedback from impacted stakeholders will be discussed with the City and incorporated into the plans. The plans will be drafted using the City’s standard title block, notes, and formatting, as well as conventional line styles.

All plans will be developed using the latest AutoCAD Civil 3D software at the following scales unless instructed otherwise by the City:

Sheet Type Horizontal Scale Vertical Scale
Title Sheet Not Applicable Not Applicable
Water Main Connection Details Scales Vary Scales Vary
Water Main Plans 1” = 20’ Not Applicable
Traffic Control Plans 1” = 40’ Not Applicable
Designs will adhere to the latest editions of the governing standards for each design component which may include the following:

Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design (Concrete Infrastructure) Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Devices (Signing and Striping, Traffic Control) Caltrans Standard Plans (Signing and Striping)
City of Lomita Standard Drawings (Water Mains)
Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (Pavement, Concrete Infrastructure) 1 2
3 4
5 SPECIFICATIONS
OE will draft the specifications package utilizing any boilerplate templates the City has available and will be prepared in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook).

Clarity of bid items, site control, and payment method for each item of work are crucial in the preparation of the project specifications. We will ensure that each pay item is clearly referenced and described in each applicable section of work. The specifications will have all necessary contacts for utilities or residents that SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 16 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
have special concerns and will delineate all items needing relocation on the Contractor’s part. If specific details or photographs are required in the specifications, they will be included as well. Close attention will be paid to the delineation of each bid item to ensure that the specified project scope covers the City’s full intent.

COST ESTIMATES
The cost estimate development will be a continuous process which begins at project inception and ends with design completion. Our office constantly updates the unit price records from recent local projects to provide the most accurate project estimated costs. OE will provide an updated cost estimate at each submittal. With the use of our modern Civil 3D software, we can track the quantities and costs while preparing the plan set.

This allows us to monitor the costs as the design evolves. The cost estimate for the construction shall be based on the quantity take-offs for the project. OE will coordinate and conduct value engineering study/ analysis for any proposed improvements.

SUBMITTALS
OE will submit physical copies of the plans and electronic copies of cost estimate and specifications to the City for review and feedback. OE will coordinate a Plan Check Meeting with the City following completion of their review. OE will also prepare a summary of the submittal review comments and scanned red-lined plans in electronic format. If required, OE will schedule a site visit with the City to assess the proposed alignment and review constructability issues.

2.4 | Traffic Control Plans
- Traffic Control Plans (digital copies and hard copies – formats and quantities to match PS&E submittals) Traffic Control Plans (TCP) will be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the City of Lomita Standard Drawings. Although the RFP requests submittal of the TCP with the 90% plans, it is recommended that the TCP be prepared with the 60% plans as it is anticipated that traffic control setups will extend through the City of Los Angeles and Caltrans right-of-way which will require encroachment permits.

2.5 | Caltrans Encroa chment Permit
- Draft and Final Traffic Control Plans (digital and hard copies) - Encroachment Permit (digital and hard copies)
A Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be required due to the setup of traffic control setup on 247th Place and the Ebony Lane/Lomita Boulevard intersection. OE will work with Caltrans throughout the design process to acquire an encroachment permit from Caltrans District 7 prior to construction. An initial meeting will be arranged with Caltrans to discuss scheduling constraints and subsequent meetings will be arranged as necessary to review the traffic control plans. The traffic control plans will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Standard Plans, Highway Design Manual, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices where required and submitted to Caltrans to secure the encroachment permit.

2.6 | City of Los Angeles TCP Review
- TCP Approval (digital copy)
OE has confirmed with the City of Los Angeles that a review of the Traffic Control Plans will be required due to the setup of traffic control setup on 247th Place and the Ebony Lane/Lomita Boulevard intersection that is anticipated to extend into their right-of-way. An initial meeting will be arranged with the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation to discuss scheduling constraints and subsequent meetings will be arranged as necessary to review the traffic control plans. Comments from the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation will be incorporated into the traffic control plans and a final plan set will be submitted.

Final Design Phase

3.1 | 90% PS&E
- 90% Plans (digital copy and 2 hard copies – 24” x 36” format on bond paper) - 90% Cost Estimate (digital copy and 2 hard copies)
- 90% Specifications (digital copy and 2 hard copies)
- Submittal review comments/responses and red-lined plans (digital copies – PDF format) The 90% submittal will be prepared and submitted for review following the same processes described in the 60% submittal task.

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 17 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project

3.2 | 100% PS&E
- 100% Plans (2 hard copies – 24” x 36” format on bond paper, 1 hard copy – 24” x 36” double matte 4mm Mylar sheets – signed and stamped)
- 100% Specifications (hard copy – bound)
- 100% Construction Cost Estimate (hard copy)
- Complete PS&E Package (digital copies – USB thumb drive) - AutoCAD and PDF design files (digital copies – USB thumb drive) Once the City has completed the final review of the PS&E, OE will incorporate the plan check comments into the 100% PS&E Submittal. OE will expeditiously work towards the completion and submittal of the 100% PS&E. It is not anticipated that any major changes will be required for the 100% Submittal, and it will be our goal to have a quick turnaround so that the City can actively pursue getting this project out to bid. Additionally, if upon submittal of the 100% PS&E package it is noted that minor changes are needed, OE will incorporate all necessary changes.

At this phase, plans will meet the 5 C’s, consistent, clear, correct, constructible, and complete.

Bidding and Cons truction Suppor t Phase

4.1 | Bidding and Cons truction Suppor t
- Responses to Design Inquiries (digital copies)
OE will provide the following ongoing support services during the bid and construction phases:

Attend Pre-Bid Meeting
Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) and Clarification (RFCs) during bid phase Attend Pre-Construction Meeting
Review Construction Submittals
Respond to RFIs during construction phase (8 RFIs)
Assist with Contract Change Order (4 CCOs) and Cost Estimate Analysis 1 2
3 4
5 6
Revisions to the PS&E package or providing additional administrative support can be done at the City’s request on time and material basis using the hourly rates in our fee proposal. Additionally, we can provide full-service construction management and inspection services upon City request.

4.2 | As-Built Plans
- As-built drawings (hard copy - 24” x 36” double matte 4mm Mylar sheets – signed and stamped) - Autocad and PDF design files (digital copies – USB flash drive) OE will prepare as-built plans based on red-lined plans provided by the contractor. The plans will be submitted to the City Plan Library within 30 days of completing construction.

Optional Tas ks
a/b | Utility Pothol ing
- Potholing summary (digital copy)
If it is determined upon completing the initial design for the project that the utility research data gathered is not sufficient to accurately determine the locations of the utilities or there is a concern that conflicts may exist that require field verification, the recommendation will be made for utility potholing to be conducted prior to construction. A preliminary cost estimate for 8 utility potholes advanced between 10 to 15 feet below grade has been provided. As the potholing scope cannot be determined conclusively until utility as-builts have been overlaid on the preliminary design, a per day cost has also been included in the fee table for any additional potholes required that is equivalent to 2 potholes advanced between 10 to 15 feet below grade).

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 18 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
c | Topographic Survey
- Topographic survey basemap, CAD survey files (digital copies) OE will provide all surveying services required. The following is a summary of the scope items that may be required to complete the project.

Task 1 – Site Control
Establish a site-wide network of horizontal/vertical control to serve as the basis for any subsequent boundary, topographic, or construction staking surveys that may be required throughout the course of the project. CL Surveying and Mapping will reference the California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS83) horizontally, and the North American Vertical Datum 1988, vertically.

Task 2 – Centerline/Right-of-Way Establishment/Mapping
conduct the field measurements necessary to re-trace the centerlines and rights-of-ways within the project limits. This effort does not constitute a full and complete boundary survey of the adjacent land parcels. Survey monuments located and indicated on the survey shall be limited to existing, centerline monuments found to be present along the street and all associated ties as indicated.

Task 3 – Topography and Street Cross Sections
Perform a field topographic survey to document existing site topography and planimetrics within the project limits. Substantial visible improvements will be located within the street right-of-way including utilities, manholes, valve covers, utility vaults and covers, sign posts, signs, trees, utility poles, traffic signal poles, cross gutters, local depressions, catch basins, driveway openings, sidewalks, corner access ramps, fire hydrants, parkway drains, etc. Visible indications of surface utilities lying within the project limits will be located, as will accurate lid/rim elevations for drainage structures present. Storm drain manholes and sewer manholes will be dipped to get accurate invert elevations.

Street cross sections will be taken at 50-foot intervals. The standard cross-sectional data will consist of Rightof-Way, Back of Walk, Top of Curb, Flow Line, Gutter Lip, and Crown for both sides of the street. Survey will extend approximately 10 feet into the private properties in the event that offsite improvements are required.

D | Geotechnical Investigation
- Geotechnical Investigation Report (digital copy)
A pavement and subsurface evaluation will be conducted by Noorzay Geotechnical Services, Inc. based on the primary tasks outlined in the RFP. The geotechnical assessment will be conducted at 5 locations (approximately 1 borehole per 500 feet) along the proposed water main alignments.

The general scope of work is as follows:
• Mark borehole locations.
• Obtain a no-fee encroachment permit from City.
• Call USA to mark utilities.
• Provide traffic control in accordance with the MUTCD. • Drill 5 exploratory boreholes in the pavement within the City right-of-way to depths of approximately 10 feet below grade. • Conduct laboratory testing to include, but not limited to, in-situ moisture content and dry density, optimum moisture content and maximum dry density, direct shear, expansion index, preliminary corrosion characteristics, No. 200 wash sieve analysis, and R-value.
• Prepare a Geotechnical Investigation Report with a summary of pavement and soil conditions, as well as design recommendations for pavement design, trenching, and shoring.

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
| 19 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
DESIGN engineering QA/QC
QA Quality Assurance is a proactive
measure taken to verify that the
systems and procedures OE has put
in place are in conformance with the
City’s requirements and expectations. Achieving design
quality is the foundation for keeping costs under control during construction. By focusing resources on producing quality design, QA provides a better return on investment.

It must be followed during all phases of project design.

The most effective Construction Management (CM)
approach should begin during design because emphasizing design quality and design clarity is the surest way to
minimize the amount of change orders, claims and
construction costs. The most effective and productive QA approach is focusing on producing well-documented, well designed plans and specifications at a standard of high quality. This would mean it must be Clear and
understandable, Complete, Correct, Consistent, and
Constructible (the “5 C’s”). The Contractor receiving high quality plans would know exactly what to bid, keeping
areas of interpretation to a minimum.

The requirement for public bidding provides additional
incentive for the design engineering team to achieve both quality and clarity in project plans and specifications. The primary goal in achieving the highest project quality is obtained by implementing and maintaining both accuracy
and consistency among the calculations, drawings,
specifications on all project documents.

Plan checks will check that the plans meet the 5 C’s:

Consistent, Clear, Correct, Constructible, and Complete.

QC Quality Control means performing all
activities in conformance with valid
requirements, no matter how large
or small their overall contribution
would be to the design process. Good CAD techniques,
attention to detail, and checking that plans are correct and useful to the contractor are also essential to quality.

Our project engineers and project managers recognize
that quality is the result of several processes. It requires a team to perform many appropriate activities at the right time during the plans development process. Quality
Control does not solely consist of a review after a product is completed. It is an approach alongside an understanding that quality is a critical point of focus throughout every moment of the design process.

The design team follows OE’s established design policies, procedures, standards and guidelines in the preparation and review of all design products for compliance and good engineering practice as directed by the Project QC Plan.

COST CONTROL
We use Advanced Financial Software to prepare invoices
and reports, which allows the City to request billing
statements at any time in the billing cycle. We can
also send a real-time report of hours and expenses,
letting the City easily compare proposed resources to
resources used and/or remaining.

DOCUMENT CONTROL
OE operates on a HIPAA Certified, Enterprise Grade,
Cloud Filing system that will be used on all documents
and folders to ensure proper documentation and
transparency. We map all of the City’s standards, folder structure, templates and document formats and store
it on our cloud-based ENTERPRISE account for
implementation. This cloud-based account allows for
secure, remote access and review of our entire filing
system by City staff, to ensure that documentation
and filing is done in compliance with the project
requirements. Each City staff member attached to the
project will be able to select a password which provides access to view, upload, or download any of the project
files (PS&E/Schedule/Utility Logs/Field Observations/
Daily Reports/Photo Diaries, etc.) without having to
change the City’s existing IT framework. This document
control system is also compliant with Caltrans’ LAPM
filing requirements. Additionally, this flexibility allows the City staff access to the project files anywhere and on any device, as well as provide access to select files (like photos) to other collaborators.
ground
level
Drafting • Calculations • Document
Formatting
pm
level
Design
Compliance • Project Intent
Compliance
qa
level
Completeness
of Document • Verify “Biddable”
Plans

INITIAL
PEER
REVIEW

PROJECT

MANAGER
REVIEW

QUALITY

ASSURANCE
REVIEW
1 2 3
1 2 3
plan review

ERROR MITIGATION
OUR DOCUMENTS WILL GO THROUGH 3 LEVELS
OF REVIEW PRIOR TO EACH SUBMITTAL:

THIS THREE TIERED REVIEW ALLOWS FOR ERROR
MITIGATION ON 3 SEPARATE LEVELS OF DETAIL:

SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 20 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
schedule

ID TASKS
Site Research Phase 5 7/5/23 7/11/23
1 Kick-Off Meeting 1 7/5/23 7/5/23
2 Research and Review Available Data 1 7/6/23 7/6/23
3 Initial Outreach to Caltrans and City of LA 1 7/7/23 7/7/23 4 Utility Research and Notification (First Notice) 2 7/7/2023 7/10/23 5 Drone Mapping 3 7/7/23 7/11/23
Preliminary Design Phase 112 7/12/23 12/14/23
6 Base Maps 5 7/12/23 7/18/23
7 Site Evaluation 2 7/19/23 7/20/23
8 60% PS&E (Includes Traffic Control Plans) 30 7/19/23 8/29/23 9 Utility Reserach and Notification (Second Notice) 2 8/30/23 8/31/23 10 Submit 60% PS&E to City 1 8/30/23 8/30/23
11 City Review of 60% PS&E 15 8/30/23 9/19/23
12 Caltrans TCP Submittal, Review, and Permit Acquisition 62 9/20/23 12/14/23 13 City of LA TCP Submittal, Review and Permit Acquisition 62 9/20/23 12/14/23 Final Design Phase 63 9/20/23 12/15/23
14 90% PS&E 20 9/20/23 10/17/23
15 Submit 90% PS&E to City 1 10/18/23 10/18/23
16 City Review of 90% PS&E 15 10/18/23 11/7/23
17 100% PS&E 5 11/8/23 11/14/23
18 Submit 100% PS&E to City 1 11/15/23 11/15/23
19 City Review of 100% PS&E 15 11/16/23 12/6/23
20 Final PS&E 5 12/7/23 12/13/23
21 Submit Final PS&E to City 1 12/14/23 12/14/23
22 Utility Research and Notification (Final Notice) 1 12/15/23 12/15/23 Bid Assistance/Cons truction Suppor t Phase 2 12/18/23 12/19/23 23 Bidding and Construction Support 1 12/18/23 12/18/23 24 As-Built Plans 1 12/19/23 12/19/23

DAYS BEGIN END
JUly august september october November December
5 10 15 20 25 30 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 2023
1 SECTION 3: Scope of Work and Project Approach
Onward Engineering | Design Smarter. Build Better.
| 21 Request for Proposal, Design Services for the city of Lomita, Zone G Water Main Replacement Project
TASKS
$ 175 /Hr $ 158 /Hr $ 130 /Hr $ 400 /Hr LS LS

PRELIMINARY RESEARCH PHASE
Task 1.1 Kick-Off Meeting 6 $ 892.00 $ - $ 892.00
Task 1.2 Progress Meetings (x8) 8 $ 1,152.00 $ - $ 1,152.00 Task 1.3 Plan Check Meetings (x3) 6 $ 864.00 $ - $ 864.00 Task 1.4 Research and Review Available Data 16 $ 2,304.00 $ - $ 2,304.00 Task 1.5 Utility Research and Notification 38 $ 5,108.00 $ - $ 5,108.00 Task 1.6 Drone Mapping 10 $ 1,356.00 $ - $ 1,356.00
PRELIMINARY RESEARCH PHASE SUB-TOTAL 84 $ 11,676.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,676.00

PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE
Task 2.1 Base Maps 82 $ 10,772.00 $ - $ 10,772.00
Task 2.2 Site Evaluation 10 $ 1,356.00 $ - $ 1,356.00
Task 2.3 60% PS&E 192 $ 26,170.00 $ - $ 26,170.00
Task 2.4 Caltrans Encroachment Permit 32 $ 4,608.00 $ - $ 4,608.00 Task 2.5 City of Los Angeles TCP Review 4 $ 632.00 $ - $ 632.00 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE SUB-TOTAL 320 $ 43,538.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 43,538.00

FINAL DESIGN PHASE
Task 3.1 Traffic Control Plans 102 $ 14,022.00 $ - $ 14,022.00 Task 3.2 90% PS&E 152 $ 20,970.00 $ - $ 20,970.00
Task 3.3 100% and Final PS&E 94 $ 12,758.00 $ - $ 12,758.00 FINAL DESIGN PHASE SUB-TOTAL 348 $ 47,750.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 47,750.00

BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT PHASE
Task 4.1 Bidding and Construction Support 16 $ 2,528.00 $ - $ 2,528.00 Task 4.2 As-Built Plans 18 $ 2,396.00 $ - $ 2,396.00
BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT PHASE SUB-TOTAL 34 $ 4,924.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,924.00 TOTAL HOURS AND COSTS 786 $ 107,888.00 $ - $ 107,888.00

OPTIONAL TASKS
Task A Utility Potholing (8 BHs to 15 Feet Below Grade) & 1 Day Soil Sampling 0 $ - $ 23,554.00 $ 23,554.00 $ 23,554.00 Task B Utility Potholing (Per Day - 2 BHs to 15 Feet Below Grade) 0 $ - $ 7,717.00 $ 7,717.00 $ 7,717.00 Task C Topographic Survey 56 $ 22,400.00 $ - $ 22,400.00 Task D Geotechnical Investigation 3 $ 446.00 $ 13,750.00 $ 13,750.00 $ 14,196.00 8 ONWARD ENGINEERING

QA/QC MANAGERPROJECT MANAGER
3 PROJECT ENGINEER
2 4
3 8
2 40
2 56
1 16
0 18 0
2 32
8 6 80 0
0 27 0
16 2
4 2
2 2
24 16
4 City of Lomita - Zone G Water Main Replacement Project 4 4
OE
TOTAL
HOURS
OE

SUB-TOTAL
COST
SUBCONSULTANT

SUB-TOTAL
COST

GRAND TOTAL
COST

POTHOLING SERVICESC-BELOW

SUB-CONSULTANT
2-PERSON SURVEYCREWGEOTECHNICAL SERVICESNOORZAY GEO
2 6
57 78
8 150
16 2 66 252 0
76 110
76 262
16 16
40 Exhibit 4
1 TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Carla Dillon, P.E., Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: Consideration of 247th Area Project – Los Angeles City Permit Fee RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize payment for Los Angeles City Permit Fee for the 247th Area Project for approximately $320,000; and appropriate $260,000 from Water Capital to the 247th Area Project
BACKGROUND:

This 247th Area Project consists of abandoning a watermain that runs north and south within private properties crossing 246th Street, 247th Street, 247th Place, and 248th Street.

The proposed new water main will extend from 246th Street beyond the City boundaries, looping within the City of Los Angeles right of way and along Western Avenue (which is Caltrans right of way), and connects back to the City of Lomita along 247th Street, 247th Place, 248th Street and Lomita Blvd. This project consists of constructing approximately 3,300 linear feet of PVC water pipeline and appurtenances (fire hydrants, valves, services, and fittings). The existing pipeline located in private property will be abandoned.

This project is funded through the City’s Water Capital Fund ($375,000) and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) ($1,125,000).

In order to construct in the City of Los Angeles right-of-way, a permit is required. The original budgeted amount for this permit was approximately $60,000 based on past fees for a similar project extending pipelines outside Lomita City limits and reasonably expected increases. Los Angeles City has increased fees resulting in an excavation permit totaling $318,542.99.

When Lomita City staff learned of the increased fee amount, alternative project designs were considered to reduce the scope that may require these fees. Staff has also consulted with Los Angeles City staff, had a meeting with Council member Tim McOsker’s staff, and provided project information including highlighting existing pavement Item No. 7o

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 conditions. While the alternative project designs may reduce the initial fee amounts, the realignment would result in increased construction costs, increased design costs, and additional long-term maintenance costs. To date, none of the efforts to reduce the fees have been successful, and staff recommends moving forward with the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The approved 247th Area Project budget was $1,500,000 for design and construction expenses. Appropriating additional funds are necessary to cover the cost of the Los Angeles City Permit, in the amount of $260,000.

OPTIONS

1. Approve staff’s recommendation.

2. Provide alternative direction.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Permit fee from LA City
Reviewed by: Approved by:

Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:

Carla Dillon, P.E.

Public Works Director

GENERAL DEPOSIT
EXCAVATION AND CLASS "A" PERMANENT

RESURFACING APPLICATION / PERMIT
This Permit has Supplemental Permit(s) with Reference No. 2023002016

APPLICANT
Onward Engineering - For the City of Lomita ,

ADDRESS
300 S Harbor Boulevard Suite 814

CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
Anaheim 92805 7146448362

REQUEST PREPARED BY TELEPHONE
Justin Smeets (714) 644-8362

ALL WORK MUST BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST ADOPTED

EDITION & SUPPLEMENTS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC

WORKS CONSTRUCTION, THE LATEST REVISION OF THE BROWN BOOK, AND THE WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK (WATCH MANUAL).

JOB ADDRESS
24817 Western Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90717
JOB DESCRIPTION:

The scope of work includes trenching and installation of 8" DR 14 PVC pipe along 246th St, 247th St, 247th Pl, 248th St, Lomita Blvd, and Western Ave (local street) within the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles only. Work will also include potholing, pavement restoration, and striping as necessary to restore the existing surface conditions.

Permit Cuts:

No. L x W x
D
On Street Cross
Street
SDRF Sq
Ft
SDRF Fee Surface Backfill
18 315.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
246TH WESTERN 3,916.66 $32,273.30 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
23 298.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
WESTERN 246TH 3,711.79 $30,585.16 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
26 308.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
247TH WESTERN 3,832.30 $31,578.18 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
JOB Sq. Ft. 6,622.50
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT RATE FEE $
U-Permit
Excavation
<= 1,000
1 EA $191.00 $0.00
U-Permit
Special Eng
Fee

0.0 Hrs $149.00 $0.00
Special
Inspec. Fee

0.0 Hrs $95.00 $0.00
Overtime
Inspec. Fee

0.0 Hrs $95.00 $0.00
Inspection 6,622.50 SQ FT Cost Cost
BSS Peak
Hr.

Comp.Fee
Blvd II
(Major
Highway -
Class II)
EA $257.00 $257.00
LADOT
Peak Hr.

Comp.Fee
Blvd II
(Major
Highway -
Class II)
EA $0.00 $0.00
Street
Damage
33,270.29 Sq. Ft. $318,247.20
SDRF
Admin. Fee
1 EA $18.50 $18.50
SDRF
Admin.

Surcharge
1 EA $2.30
CONST
MGMT

TRAFFIC
FEE
0 Lanes 0 Days $0.00
Dev Srvc
Sur
(3.00%)-
Min $1

3.00% $0.00
Equip &
Training Sur
(7.00%)-
Min $1

7.00% $17.99
TOTAL FEE $318,542.99
JOB NO.

DRAWING NO.

ACCOUNT NO.

U.S.A. NO.

LOCATOR CODE
THOMAS GUIDE PAGE 793:3:J
Attachment No 1
28 273.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
WESTERN 247TH 3,410.51 $28,102.60 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
29 277.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
WESTERN 247TH 3,458.71 $28,499.81 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
30 303.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
247TH WESTERN 3,772.05 $31,081.67 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
31 241.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
WESTERN 248TH 3,024.87 $24,924.92 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
32 295.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
248TH WESTERN 3,675.64 $30,287.25 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
CMB
38 305.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
LOMITA WESTERN 3,937.50 $76,545.00 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
Slurry
39 34.00
(ft)
x 2.50
(ft)
x 4.00
(ft)
WESTERN 249TH 530.26 $4,369.31 Street
Asphalt
Concrete
Slurry

IS THIS WORK RELATED TO A CITY NOTICE OF PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENT? No
IS STREET NOW UNDER CONSTRUCTION? No
Greater than 1000 sq. ft.

ISSUED BY:

Chinh Dinh
Reference Number 2022003227
Permit Number U-2386-0006

INSPECTION REPORT
No Inspection records found.

INSPECTION REMARKS:

MUST CALL FOR INSPECTION : (213)485-5080

BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION
W.O. NO. UR600984 /
Date Issued 01/06/2023
Date Expires 08/28/2023
Work to be Completed by: 07/25/2023
GENERAL CONDITIONS:

1. PRE-INSPECTION MEETING: THE PERMITTEE SHALL CONTACT THE BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINSTRATION (INSPECTION) AT (213) 485-5080 FOR A PRE-INSPECTION MEETING PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. THE FINE FOR WORKING WITHOUT REQUESTING INSPECTION IS $4,000. (LAMC 62.61(e)(1)).

2. UTILITIES HAVE ONLY BEEN CHECKED TO THE EXTENT OF 10-FT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE TRENCH IN THIS PLAN.

3. RECENTLY RESURFACED STREET: THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT GRANT THE PERMITTEE PERMISSION TO

PROCEED TO CUT, EXCAVATE OR DAMAGE A STREET PAVEMENT WHEN THE STREET, THROUGH SITE OBSERVATION, APPEARS TO BE RECENTLY RESURFACED. IN SUCH A CASE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH ANY OF THE PERMITTED WORK AND MUST IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE BUREAU OF ENGINEERING DISTRICT OFFICE THAT ISSUE THE PERMIT. IF THE

PERMITTEE PROCEEDS TO WORK WITHOUT CONTACTING THE BUREAU OF ENGINEERING DISTRICT OFFICE, ANY DAMAGE TO

A STREET RESURFACED WITHIN ONE YEAR WILL REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE TO REPAVE THE ENTIRE STREET WIDTH FROM BLOCK TO BLOCK.

4. INSPECTION: BCA INSPECTION (bca.lacity.org/dispatch) MUST BE REQUESTED NO LATER THAN NOON OF THE PRECEDING WORK DAY.

5. PERMIT ON SITE: A COPY OF THIS PERMIT MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. THE FINE FOR NOT HAVING THIS PERMIT ON SITE IS $500/DAY (LAMC 62.61(e)(1)).

6. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA): CALL USA AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF WORK: 1-800-277-2600.

7. 48 HOURS NOTICE: AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK, CALL BSL AT (323) 913-4721 AND DOT TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AT (213) 473-8468.

8. ONCE PERMITTED EXCAVATION WORK HAS BEGUN, IT MUST BE DILIGENTLY PROSECUTED TO COMPLETION, AND MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE COMPLETION DATE LISTED ON THE PERMIT.

9. CHANGES: ALL CHANGES TO PLAN OR PERMIT MUST HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S BUREAU OF ENGINEERING

10. LIABILITY: THE PERMITTEE WILL HOLD THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARMLESS FOR ANY INJURY OR HARM CAUSED BY THE PERMITTE'S WORK PERFORMED BY THIS PERMIT.

11. AC RESURFACING: ANY TRENCHING AND RESURFACING IN STREET ASPHALT SHALL BE PER LATEST VERSION OF LA CITY STANDARD PLAN S-477.

12. JOB SITE MAINTENANCE: THE JOB SITE (INCLUDING TEMPORARY RESURFACING) MUST BE MAINTAINED BY THE PERMITTEE

UNTIL PERMANENT RESURFACING IS COMPLETED

13. TEMPORARY RESURFACING: ALL PERMANENT RESURFACING MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 3 WEEKS OF THE TEMPORARY RESURFACING.

14. ASPHALT TAGS: ALL PERMANENT RESURFACING MUST BE IDENTIFIED BY AN APPROVED MARKER/TAG IDENTIFYING PERMITTEE AND THE YEAR THE WORK WAS COMPLETED. TAGS ARE TO BE PLACED AS CLOSE TO THE CURB AS POSSIBLE. FOR EXCAVATIONS LESS THAN 50' LONG, ONLY ONE TAG SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE MIDDLE. FOR LONGER EXCAVATIONS, TAGS SHOULD BE PLACED AT 50' INTERVALS AND AT BOTH ENDS.

15. EXPIRED PERMITS: IF WORK HAS NOT BEGUN WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT WILL BE CANCELLED. (LAMC 62.02)

16. SATURDAY WORK: FOR PERMITS WHERE WORK IS ALLOWED ONLY ON SATURDAY, TRENCHES AND/OR EXCAVATIONS THAT

CANNOT BE COMPLETELY BACKFILLED AND RESURFACED IN THE SAME DAY, MUST BE COVERED WITH STEEL PLATES WHICH SHALL BE RECESSED TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE BY COLD MILLING TO PREVENT MOVEMENT, NOISE, OR VIBRATION.

17. DECORATIVE IMPROVEMENTS: PERMITTEE SHALL STOP WORK AND CONTACT THE BUREAU OF ENGINEERING PRIOR TO

CUTTING OR EXCAVATING ANY DECORATIVE SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT, OR CROSSWALK, UNLESS ALREADY ADDRESSED IN THE PERMIT OR PLANS. ANY UNAUTHORIZED DAMAGE TO THE DECORATIVE SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT, OR CROSSWALK MUST BE

REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED IN KIND BY THE PERMITTEE, AS DIRECTED BY THE BUREAU OF ENGINEERING, IN A MANNER SATISFACTORY TO THE INSPECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS.

18. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT INVALIDATE THE NEED TO GET APPROVALS OR PERMITS FROM OTHER 1 TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: Discussion and Consideration of Establishing a 60th Anniversary Ad Hoc Committee

RECOMMENDATION
Discuss the possibility of establishing an ad hoc committee for Lomita’s 60-year Anniversary celebration.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
At your last meeting, the Council directed staff to place this item on an agenda for discussion.

In 2006/2007, the City celebrated the centennial of Lomita’s founding by hosting a number of events and activities including a Hoedown and Street Dance at the Railroad Museum (as a pre-centennial kickoff), Centennial Parade, Founder’s Day (Hometown Fair), 5K Run/Walk, Golf Tournament, installation of centennial banners along Lomita Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, the release of the Lomita history book, the Lomita – A Century Remembered and an Appreciation Reception for sponsors, committee members and city staff.

At that time, the Founder’s Day Ad Hoc Committee served dual roles as both the Founder’s Day and Centennial Ad Hoc Committee. The Committee consisted of current Council Member Mark Waronek and former Council Member Susie Dever.

If the Council has a desire to establish a 60th Anniversary Ad Hoc Committee, these duties could be added to those of the existing Founder’s Day Subcommittee or create a separate committee and appoint two members.

OPTIONS:
1) Establish committee and appoint members.
2) Provide alternative direction.

Item No. SCH 8a

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 ATTACHMENTS
None

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

Prepared by: Approved by:
___________________________
Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
1 TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Carla Dillon, P.E., Director of Public Works MEETING DATE: July 18, 2023
SUBJECT: Discussion of Lane Striping on Narbonne Avenue South of Pacific Coast Highway
RECOMMENDATION:

Discussion only.

BACKGROUND:

In 2017, following a County evaluation, the City Council approved changes to restripe Narbonne Avenue to its current configuration from the northern city boundary to just north of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in conjunction with a street pavement project (Figure 1).

In addition, the city’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, adopted as a guidance document by the City Council in March 2018, calls for the lane reconfiguration on the southern portion of Narbonne Ave to allow for one driving lane in each direction, a center turn lane, two 6’ bike lanes, and parking on each side. The existing striping pattern, south of PCH is shown on Figure 2.

While the City is in the design phase of a street reconstruction project for Narbonne Avenue south of PCH, decisions need to be made prior to finalizing the plans as the pavement substructure design may vary for a traffic lane versus a parking or bike lane.

The change in 2017, with a single lane in each direction with the center turn lane, provided benefits to ease traffic concerns north of Pacific Coast Highway, and the city’s Technical Traffic Advisory Committee has received concerns with speed, visibility, and parking along the section of Narbonne Avenue that remains in its original striping pattern.

Item No. SCH 8b

CITY OF LOMITA

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 Striping North of PCH (Fig. 1) Striping South of PCH (Fig. 2) The Public Safety and Traffic Commission reviewed this proposed striping plan on June 21, 2023, and recommended the change to one driving lane in each direction. In addition, the Commission requested that staff consider angled parking on this segment of Narbonne Avenue to relieve parking congestion in the area. The City’s consultant reviewed the street width and determined that even with one side of angled parking and the other side with parallel parking, the street does not provide enough width for a driving lane in each direction, a center turn lane, and bicycle lanes.

Staff is seeking Council’s direction on the proposed restriping so the City’s design consultant can complete the pavement design. The final drawings and bid package will be presented to the City Council for approval prior to awarding the contract for construction. The final design will incorporate details, such as right turn lane pocket and no parking within a certain distance from the intersection. 3 FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time.

OPTIONS

1. Provide input on striping plan

ATTACHMENT

1. 2017 Restriping Report from LA County

2. 2023 Traffic Assessment
Reviewed by: Approved by:

Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:

Carla Dillon, PE
Public Works Director
July 27, 2017
TO: Mark McAvoy, Public Works Director
City of Lomita
FROM: Irena Guilmette
Traffic Advisor

CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO RESTRIPE NARBONNE AVENUE BETWEEN

PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LOMITA BOULEVARD
At the March 7, 2017, Lomita City Council Meeting, the Council was presented with a proposal to restripe a portion of Narbonne Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and Lomita Boulevard. This roadway reconfiguration was to be completed due to the upcoming pavement rehabilitation project on Narbonne Avenue that is slated to begin construction soon. After hearing the Staff report, the City Council made a motion to continue this matter after a more comprehensive traffic study was conducted by Los Angeles County.

Existing Conditions
This segment of Narbonne Avenue is classified as a minor arterial roadway on the 2013 Functional Classification System’s California Road System maps on file with the Federal Highway Administration. It is an undivided highway striped for two lanes of travel in each direction with on-street parking. The roadway has curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides.

Narbonne Avenue is signalized at Lomita Boulevard, 250th Street, 255th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. Between Lomita Boulevard and 250th Street, the abutting property consists of commercial and residential properties with the Lomita Magnet Elementary School located on the northwest corner of 247th Street and Narbonne Avenue. Between 250th Street and Pacific Coast Highway, there is a mix of commercial, multiple-dwelling residential and singlefamily residential development. The 0.90 mile Narbonne Avenue corridor between Pacific Coast Highway and Lomita Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph), and the average daily traffic is approximately 14,300 vehicles per day.

Proposed Conditions
This roadway reconfiguration would reallocate road space to one lane in each direction, a center two-way left-turn lane, a Class II bicycle lane in each direction with parking to remain on both sides of the roadway. The striping at the signalized intersections of Narbonne Avenue at 250th Street and 255th Street would transition the two-way left turn lanes into dedicated left turn lanes for both northbound and southbound Narbonne Avenue. The striping at the signalized intersection of Lomita Boulevard would remain the same except for the extension of the northbound left turn lane and the addition of dedicated right turn lanes on Lomita Boulevard. The existing striping at the signalized intersection of Pacific Coast Highway would remain the same. Traffic signal timing on Narbonne Avenue at the signalized intersections would need to be modified to accommodate the reconfigured roadway.

Traffic Analysis Methodology
The County of Los Angeles considers any roadway with less than 20,000 vehicles per day to be an ideal lane reconfiguration candidate and a roadway with less than 15,000 vehicles Attachment 1
per day wouldn’t require a level of service (LOS) analysis. Although Narbonne Avenue has less than 15,000 vehicles per day, for purposes of this study, the County conducted a LOS analysis at the intersection of Narbonne Avenue and Lomita Boulevard due to traffic concerns raised by the public at the March 7, 2017, City of Lomita Council Meeting. Based on the analysis, LOS ratings ranging from A through F were assigned to this intersection, with A representing free flow, and F representing congested conditions. The following table represents the LOS for the intersection of Narbonne Avenue at Lomita Boulevard:

Intersection
Narbonne Avenue
at
Lomita Boulevard
Peak Existing
Conditions
(2016)
Existing
Conditions
(2035)
Project
Conditions
(2016)
Project
Conditions
(2035)

LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C
AM D 0.85 D 0.88 C 0.81 D 0.84
PM E 0.97 F 1.01 E 0.91 E 0.95
Indicates inadequate northbound and southbound left-turn lane storage capacity Indicates adequate northbound and southbound left-turn lane storage capacity

According to the County’s General Plan, acceptable LOS is considered on a case-by-case basis with LOS D generally being the minimum desired. LOS ratings below D may be acceptable according to the County’s General Plan if the project supports the General Plan goals, such as creating an efficient multimodal transportation system that serves the needs of all residents, and promoting active transportation.

Based on the analysis, the intersection studied was categorized into the following groupings:

LOS A through D
Implementation of roadway configuration is not expected to result in traffic congestion at this intersection.

LOS E
Implementation of roadway reconfiguration is expected to result in traffic congestion at this intersection. However, LOS ratings below D may be acceptable according to the County's General Plan if the project supports the General Plan goal of promoting active transportation. The benefits, if implemented, should outweigh the traffic congestion impacts at this intersection.

LOS F with Adequate Turn-Lane Capacity
Implementation of roadway reconfiguration is expected to result in severe traffic congestion at this intersection. However, turn-lane capacities are adequate to accommodate the forecasted queue lengths. The benefits, , if implemented, should substantially outweigh the traffic congestion impacts at this intersection.

LOS F with Inadequate Turn-Lane Capacity
Implementation of roadway reconfiguration is expected to result in severe traffic congestion at this intersection. Furthermore, extending the length of the turn-lanes to accommodate the forecasted queue is not feasible due to site-specific constraints.

Implementation of roadway reconfiguration is not advisable along the roadways approaching this intersection.

No Change to LOS
For purposes of analysis, the intersection configuration is not expected to change at this location. Lane configurations from roadway reconfiguration will transition to join existing striping conditions approaching this intersection.

Although the LOS at the intersection of Narbonne Avenue at Lomita Boulevard shows a LOS of E during the PM peak hours, the northbound and southbound left-turn capacity goes from inadequate to adequate with the intersection lane changes.

Benefits of lane reconfiguration along Narbonne Avenue
Pedestrians
● Pedestrian crossing of Narbonne Avenue may be easier and safer due to a reduction in the number of lanes to cross which reduces potential conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles.

Bicyclists
● Increase in Active Transportation by providing bike lanes which meets the goals of Complete Streets and Healthy Design.
● Increase in the safety and comfort of bicyclists by providing a striped space on the roadway. The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) advocates the benefits of bike lanes, including increased bicyclist comfort and confidence on busy streets, separation between bicyclists and automobiles, increased predictability of bicycles and motorists positioning and interaction, increased total capacities of streets carrying mixed bicycle and motor vehicle traffic and a visual reminder to motorists of bicyclists’ right to the street.

Emergency Vehicles
● Adding a 2-way left-turn lane would create unimpeded lanes that can be used by emergency vehicles or motorists needing to pull over to provide through movement of emergency responders.

Motorists
● Reduce specific types of traffic collisions. Per the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, roadway configurations such as this may have a crash reduction of 19 percent on corridors within suburban areas surrounding larger cities.
● Reduce intersection conflicts.
● Enhance intersection sight distance.
● Reduces left-turn conflicts at intersections and midblock locations. ● Reduce vehicle travel speeds because having additional lanes during non-peak hours encourages people to speed.
● Provide continuous turning lanes for left-turning vehicles which may potentially reduce mid-block delay and weaving.

Community
● Improve business because people who walk or use bikes spend more money.

Cost-Effective
● Implementing roadway design during the upcoming pavement rehabilitation project on Narbonne Avenue is cost-effective because there is no need to grind out existing striping.

Left Turn Access at signalized intersections
● Left turn access for northbound and southbound Narbonne Avenue will be enhanced because dedicated left turn lanes will be installed at the signalized intersections of 250th Street and 255th Street. This will enhance visibility for left turning motorists as well as reduce left-turn collision potential.

Conclusions
Recognizing there are factors in addition to LOS that have bearing upon the suitability of roadway reconfiguration on Narbonne Avenue, it is recommended the City consider implementing these striping changes by weighing the potential benefits of facilitating multimodal transportation which supports the City of Lomita’s recently adopted Complete Streets policy.

June 8, 2023 Job No. CLOM0000-0122

MEMORANDUM
To: Suzanne Moubayed, MS, EIT
David Evans and Associates, Inc.

From: James M. Daisa, TE
RE: PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ASSESMENT OF NARBONNE / PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

INTERSECTION WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
This memorandum summarizes a preliminary operations assessment of the intersection of Narbonne Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Lomita with implementation of proposed lane reconfigurations.

Proposed Changes to Narbonne Avenue
Narbonne Avenue currently is a four-lane undivided street except at major signalized intersections where a left turn bay is provided. The proposed configuration—a “road diet”—of Narbonne Avenue is to provide one lane in each direction and a continuous center turn lane which transitions into left turn bays at select intersections to provide width to add Class II bicycle lanes in each direction. On-street parking remains as currently configured.

Intersection Capacity Analysis Methodology
With limited traffic volume data, a capacity analysis was performed to identify one of three possible operational conditions with implementation of the proposed road diet: intersection operates below capacity, intersection operates near capacity, intersection operates over capacity. The city’s level of service standard is LOS D.

Available traffic data was limited. The city provided an Engineering & Traffic Survey for establishing speed limits on Narbonne Avenue prepared in 2021 which included daily traffic counts divided into hourly volumes by direction. Bi-directional volumes on Narbonne Avenue for the PM peak hour were available north and south of the Pacific Coast Highway. Peak hour volumes for Pacific Coast Highway were derived from Caltrans’ Traffic Census Program bi-directional peak hour volume data for the year 2021. Caltrans count data was limited to Pacific Coast Highway at Route 231 and at Crenshaw Boulevard.

Intersection turn movements at Narbonne Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway were estimated based on an assumed percentage of directional traffic volumes turning left and right at the approaches of the intersection. The percentages were adjusted so that the departure volumes matched the contributing approach turning volumes as close as possible. The resulting intersection turning movements are rough approximations, but conservative.

Results of Analysis
Based on the assumptions described above, the PM peak hour capacity analysis results in an overall LOS C (see Attachment D) with the northbound and southbound approaches of Narbonne Avenue operating at a LOS D. This finding falls under the operational condition of “intersection operates below capacity”. \ Attachments:

Attachment A – Peak Hour Traffic Data for Narbonne Avenue Attachment B - Excerpt from Caltrans Peak Hour Volume Data (Year 2021) Attachment C - Derivation of Turning Movements from Directional Link Volumes Attachment D - PM Peak Hour Capacity Analysis of PCH and Narbonne Ave Attachment 2
2021

NARBONNE AVENUE
(Between Lomita Boulevard and the
Rolling Hills Estates City Boundary south of Pacific Coast Highway) Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Prepared by: Irena Guilmette, T.E. #2259
City of Lomita Traffic Advisor
Los Angeles County Public Works
September 2021

ATTACHMENT A

PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC DATA FOR NARBONNE AVENUE

NARBONNE AVENUE

TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Source: Caltrans Traffic Census Program, Peak Hour Volume Data (Year 2021) https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/census ATTACHMENT B EXCERPT FROM CALTRANS PEAK HOUR VOLUME DATA (YEAR 2021)

ATTACHMENT C

DERIVATION OF TURNING MOVEMENTS FROM DIRECTIONAL LINK VOLUMES HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 11 Report 2: Pacific Coast Highway (HWY 1) & Narbone Ave 06/05/2023 Baseline