Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Lomita City Council
October 1, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
October 1, 2024
Body
Lomita City Council
Pages
186
Original file
37.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on lomitacity.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

community health and physical activity such as parks and recreation facilities, community gardens, and safe pedestrian infrastructure. Policy RM-1.1 directs the City to develop parks and recreational facilities with amenities that meet the community’s needs and preferences. Policy RM-1.2 prioritizes parks and recreation capital improvement projects in neighborhoods and areas most in need, such as where residents are not within a ten-minute walk to a park, open space, or joint use facility. Policy RM-1.3 explores the acquisition of Navy Field and the feasibility of redeveloping the site into a new park with space for a new Public Works yard. Policy RM-1.7 directs the City to continue its research of grand funding opportunities and other sources of funding for the acquisition and construction of parks and recreation facilities to meet the diverse recreational needs of the community. Policy RM-1.8 directs the City to engage with the school district, local and regional agencies, and private developers to establish partnerships and joint use agreements aimed at expanding the range of recreational facility options available to the public.

Policy RM-1.10 allows the City to seek input from the community on the needs and investment priorities for public parks and recreational facilities.

Action RM-1a requires the City to determine the costs associated with the acquisition, development, and operation of a new park and Public Works yard on the Navy Field site and initiate discussions with the U.S. Navy regarding the transfer of the site to the City. Action RM-1c requires the City to install adequate lighting, designated crosswalks, clear signage, and other nonvehicular infrastructure to improve pedestrian and bicycle connections between residential and open space areas. Action RM-1e requires the City to research available grant funding for parks and public open space improvements and strive to apply for at least one grant per year.

As such, with compliance to environmental regulations established at the time of future park and recreational projects are proposed, and adherence to General Plan Update policies and actions, the environmental impacts associated with the construction or expansion of recreational facilities would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-4.5: Community Benefit. Collaborate with community stakeholders to expand recreational, educational, and cultural opportunities, including through cost-sharing agreements, joint use of facilities, or acquisition.

Policy LU-5.4: Physical Activity. Increase the availability of space and activities that promote community health and physical activity such as parks and recreation facilities, community gardens, and safe pedestrian infrastructure.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *431
Findings

Page 105 of 186 ends

Policy RM-1.1: Parks and Recreation Facility Amenities. Develop parks and recreational facilities with amenities that meet the community’s needs and preferences, including but not limited to play areas for children, sports courts and fields, dog parks, community meeting rooms, and accessibility updates.

Policy RM-1.2: Project Prioritization. Prioritize parks and recreation capital improvement projects in neighborhoods and areas most in need, such as where residents are not within a ten-minute walk to a park, open space, or joint use facility.

Policy RM-1.3: Navy Field. Explore the City acquisition of Navy Field and the feasibility of redeveloping the site into a new park with space for a new Public Works yard.

Policy RM-1.7: Funding for Parks. Continue to research grant funding opportunities and other sources of funding for the acquisition and construction of parks and recreation facilities to meet the diverse recreational needs of the community.

Policy RM-1.8: Partnerships and Joint Use Agreements. Engage with the school district, local and regional agencies, and private developers to establish partnerships and joint use agreements aimed at expanding the range of recreational facility options available to the public.

Policy RM-1.10: Park Assessment. Seek input from the community on the needs and investment priorities for public parks and recreational facilities.

Action RM-1a: Determine the costs associated with the acquisition, development, and operation of a new park and Public Works yard on the Navy Field site and initiate discussions with the U.S. Navy regarding the transfer of the site to the City.

Action RM-1b: Conduct accessibility assessments for all public parks and recreation facilities at least every five years.

Action RM-1c: Install adequate lighting, designated crosswalks, clear signage, and other nonvehicular infrastructure to improve pedestrian and bicycle connections between residential and open space areas.

Action RM-1e: Research available grant funding for parks and public open space improvements and strive to apply for at least one grant per year.

O. TRANSPORTATION

1. Circulation System Conflicts
Threshold: Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact TR-1, pages 4.14-17 through 4.14- 22)
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *432
Findings

Page 106 of 186 ends

Explanation: Circulation System
The General Plan Update will accommodate future growth in the city, including new businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and new residential uses. New growth is anticipated to occur primarily along Pacific Coast Highway, Lomita Boulevard, Narbonne Avenue, and Palos Verdes Drive. The Mobility Element developed as part of the General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and actions that support access to and performance of the circulation system. Goal M-1 promotes a safe and balanced circulation system for the Planning Area. Policy M-1.4 ensures that new developments in the city provide appropriate and feasible improvements to improve traffic flow and roadway operations. Policy M-1.7 encourages the development of traffic calming strategies to slow traffic and promote safety.

Action M-1b directs the City to continue to update and implement projects in Lomita’s Capital Improvement Plan to maintain the roadway network.

As a result, implementation of the General Plan Update would not conflict with applicable plans, polices, or ordinances related to vehicle circulation, and its impact on the city’s circulation system is considered less than significant.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation
The proposed Mobility Element update references and incorporates the Lomita Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, South Bay Bicycle Master Plan and the SBCCOG Local Travel Network, which include bicycling and walking improvements, and facilities that will improve non-motorized accessibility and connectivity throughout the city. The proposed Mobility Element includes new planned bike facilities on several key roadways including, but not limited to, Lomita Boulevard, Pennsylvania Avenue, Narbonne Avenue, Eshelman Avenue, Walnut Street, 250th Street, 255th Street and 262nd Street. The Project would also enhance the pedestrian experience by providing a more walkable and denser environment.

The Mobility Element developed as part of the General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and actions that support access to and the performance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Policy M-3.1 requires the City to apply Complete Street principles, which are streets that are designed to provide safe travels for all modes of travel, to all transportation improvement projects. Policy M-3.2 encourages the City to link activity and employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities. Policy M-6.3 directs the City to identify and eliminate gaps in sidewalks and bikeways to create a more complete active transportation network. Policy M-6.4 requires new developments in the city to provide bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Action M-6c directs the City to dedicate capital improvement funding for citywide projects for pedestrian facilities. The implementation of policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update would ensure that the Project would not conflict with Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *433
Findings

Page 107 of 186 ends

a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing bicycle facilities.

Therefore, Project impacts would be less than significant.

Public Transit System
The City does not have defined measures of effectiveness for public transit service and circulation. The proposed General Plan Update is expected to increase demand for travel via public transit given the proposed development and expected increase in residents and employees. This population and job growth within the city could increase the demand for public transit but also result in increased levels of vehicular traffic which could slow transit operations and impact transit reliability. The proposed Mobility Element developed as part of the General Plan Update includes policies to support and enhance transit service. Policy M-3.2 encourages the City to link activity and employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities. Policy M-5.2 encourages the City to coordinate with local public transit provides to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities. Policy M-5.3 requires that new developments construct transit facilities when appropriate. Action M-5c directs the City to explore intracity transit options. The implementation of policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update would ensure that the Project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the public transit system. Therefore, the Project’s impact is considered less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Planning. Promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable; enhances community livability and public health; offers choices in housing, jobs, amenities, and transportation; reduces pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and the expenditure of nonrenewable resources; and provides opportunities for meaningful public engagement in land use decisions.

Policy LU-1.2: Focused Growth. Focus new higher density mixed-use development along major corridors and within key activity nodes to expand housing opportunity, preserve the character of existing single-family neighborhoods, promote active transportation options, and enhance economic vitality.

Policy LU-1.3: Employment/Housing Balance. Strive to balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for residents to work locally, reduce commute times, and improve air quality.

Policy LU-3.6: Active Streetscapes. Create safe, inviting, and beautiful streetscapes that facilitate social interaction and improve active transportation along corridors.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *434
Findings

Page 108 of 186 ends

Policy LU-5.3: Active Transportation. Promote land use patterns that facilitate active transportation to encourage healthy and active lifestyles, as well as improve overall physical health for residents.

Action LU-5a: Create and maintain an inventory of the city’s pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks, street crossings, lighting, shade trees, and benches, in order to improve pedestrian mobility in all areas of the city.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Goal M-1: Local Circulation System. A community served by a safe and balanced circulation system that meets the needs of all users.

Policy M-1.1: Arterial Roadway Network. Implement and maintain the roadway network based on the classifications mapped in Figure M-1.

Policy M-1.4: Development-Related Traffic Impacts. Impose conditions on new development to provide appropriate and feasible improvements to enhance and/or prevent any impediment to traffic flow, parking, ADA accessibility, and roadway operations.

Policy M-1.7: Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Use traffic calming strategies such as signage, speed radar feedback signs, curb extensions, and deflections, as recommended in the City’s Traffic Calming Toolkit, to create a pedestrian-friendly circulation system and promote safety, while not reducing parking supply.

Policy M-1.9: New Connections. Explore new connections within the grid system, either non-vehicular or vehicular.

Action M-1a: As funding for studies becomes available, periodically review and assess the vehicular level of service along city facilities to determine what, if any, improvements are warranted to maintain a safe and efficient flow of traffic throughout Lomita. Based on a thorough review of facility operations and funding availability, improvements should be included in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and/or required as part of project approval through the development review process.

Action M-1b: Continue to update and implement projects in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan to maintain and repair roadways, and construct and improve roadways to build out the roadway network to ensure adequate levels of service.

Action M-1f: Evaluate the applicability of traffic calming tools to minimize cut-through traffic on local streets, especially in residential areas and near schools, and implement improvements as necessary.

Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A community with a well-designed and built transportation network that is safe, accessible, comfortable, and convenient for all transportation modes and users
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *435
Findings

Page 109 of 186 ends

Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets for Roadway Projects. Apply complete streets principles to all transportation improvement projects (e.g., safety, intelligent transportation systems, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities) to accommodate the needs of street users of all ages and abilities.

Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Connectivity. Link activity centers, employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities.

Policy M-3.3: Streetscape Improvements. Require roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety, including street lighting, wayfinding, street trees, and other nonvehicular infrastructure.

Policy M-3.6: Safe Routes to School. Provide infrastructure improvements, enforcement, and incentives to support Safe Routes to School programs and promote walking and bicycling to local schools.

Action M-3a: Develop strategies and guidelines to set curb use priorities that consider the needs of through traffic, transit stops, bus turnouts, passenger drop-off/pick-up, deliveries, and short-term/long-term parking, especially along major corridors.

Goal M-5: Transit. A community connected to a comprehensive public transit system.

Policy M-5.1: Transit Use. Support programs encouraging public transit use by people living in, working in, or visiting Lomita.

Policy M-5.2: Improve Local Public Transit Service. Work with Metro, Torrance Transit, and other local public transit providers to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities, including bus stops, in the city.

Policy M-5.3: Transit Facilities. Require new developments to construct, when appropriate, transit facilities, including bus turn-outs, bus stop infrastructure, and route information signage.

Action M-5a: Continue on-going coordination with transit authorities toward the expansion of transit facilities.

Action M-5b: Work with transit providers to increase transit service frequency, speed, and reliability and increase ridership and to strengthen linkages and access to key destinations.

Action M-5c: Explore new intracity transit options such as a Lomita trolley to transport individuals between commercial areas, residential areas, and parks.

Goal M-6: Active Transportation. A community with a comprehensive network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities that encourages active transportation.

Policy M-6.1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to provide active transportation facilities that can serve as an Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *436
Findings

Page 110 of 186 ends

alternative to automobiles, including the Plan’s facility recommendations as shown in Figure M-2.

Policy M-6.2: Local Travel Network. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote local micromobility modes by implementing the Local Travel Network plan and supporting efforts to integrate the network with adjacent cities, as shown in Figure M-3.

Policy M-6.3: Sidewalk and Bikeway Gaps. Create a connected and complete active transportation network by identifying and eliminating gaps in sidewalks and bikeways, evaluating the adequacy of existing urban trails, and prioritizing sidewalk maintenance.

Policy M-6.4: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities at New Developments. Require new residential and non-residential developments in the city to provide safe and attractive bicycle and pedestrian facilities, such as secure bicycle parking, pedestrian-scale lighting, street furniture, landscaping, and other improvements.

Action M-6a: As part of development review and specific plans, require land development projects to provide connectivity and accessibility to a mix of uses such as schools, parks, work, and shopping destinations that meet residents’ daily needs including secure parking and safety measures.

Action M-6b: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code, as necessary, to consider bicycle and pedestrian access as part of the site plan review for new development projects.

Action M-6c: Dedicate capital improvement funding for citywide projects including pedestrian refuge islands, raised crosswalks, or other relevant crosswalk enhancements as they become available.

Action M-6d: Require that all roadway resurfacing projects and land development projects with impacts to roadways be subject to a review process that considers lane reconfiguration and other opportunities to improve the bicycle and pedestrian network.

Action M-6e: Establish a sidewalk maintenance schedule to improve accessibility and include repair of cracks from tree roots, etc., and clearance of sidewalk space through colocation or undergrounding of utilities and moving signage.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.5: Safe Routes. Provide safe pedestrian and bicycle pathways to parks, recreational facilities, and schools to foster a sense of community well-being and to promote active lifestyles.

Action RM-1c: Install adequate lighting, designated crosswalks, clear signage, and other nonvehicular infrastructure to improve pedestrian and bicycle connections between residential and open space areas. (Also refer to Mobility Element.)

2. Design Features
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *437
Findings

Page 111 of 186 ends

Threshold: Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact TR-3, pages 4.14-28 through 4.13- 31)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update would involve the alteration, intensification, and redistribution of land uses. Geometric design features would generally be limited to individual projects’ internal roadway networks, as well as driveways along city roads. Hazards are typically assessed at the individual project level when an actual design and construction of a circulation facility is proposed. The City would review site-specific developments to ensure the provision of adequate ingress and egress and that site distance standards would be implemented.

The types of uses included as part of the General Plan Update are generally similar to existing and surrounding uses and thereby are compatible with the existing uses in the Planning Area and in the surrounding area. In addition, the proposed Mobility Element developed as part of the General Plan Update contains policies in support of roadway network safety and reducing design hazards. This includes Policy M-3.5 and Action M-3e which promotes managing and improving the City’s transportation network to be safe, accessible and consistent with ADA and to include ADA accessible features as part of roadway infrastructure projects. Policy M-3.4 encourages roadway design to include traffic calming measures to maintain safe vehicular speeds. Policy LU-2.2 requires compatibility between adjacent land uses to enhance livability and promote healthy lifestyles. The implementation of goals, policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update and compliance with the Lomita Municipal Code would ensure that new development in the Planning Area would not substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses. Therefore, the impact of the Project with respect to design and incompatible use hazards would be considered less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Planning. Promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable; enhances community livability and public health; offers choices in housing, jobs, amenities, and transportation; reduces pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and the expenditure of nonrenewable resources; and provides opportunities for meaningful public engagement in land use decisions.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *438
Findings

Page 112 of 186 ends

Policy LU-2.2: Compatible Uses. Require compatibility between adjacent land uses to enhance livability and promote healthy lifestyles.

Policy LU-2.5: Mixed-Use Design Integration. Require residential and nonresidential portions of mixed-use buildings and sites to be well-integrated through site and building design that ensures compatibility among different uses on the same site.

Action LU-5a: Create and maintain an inventory of the city’s pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks, street crossings, lighting, shade trees, and benches, in order to improve pedestrian mobility in all areas of the city.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Policy M-1.6: Promote Safe Streets. Use a safe systems approach for transportation planning, street design, operations, emergency response, and maintenance that proactively identifies opportunities to improve safety where conflicts between users exist to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries in our roadways.

Policy M-1.7: Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Use traffic calming strategies such as signage, speed radar feedback signs, curb extensions, and deflections, as recommended in the City’s Traffic Calming Toolkit, to create a pedestrian-friendly circulation system and promote safety, while not reducing parking supply.

Action M-1f: Evaluate the applicability of traffic calming tools to minimize cut-through traffic on local streets, especially in residential areas and near schools, and implement improvements as necessary.

Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A community with a well-designed and built transportation network that is safe, accessible, comfortable, and convenient for all transportation modes and users
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets for Roadway Projects. Apply complete streets principles to all transportation improvement projects (e.g., safety, intelligent transportation systems, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities) to accommodate the needs of street users of all ages and abilities.

Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Connectivity. Link activity centers, employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities.

Policy M-3.3 Streetscape Improvements. Require roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety, including street lighting, wayfinding, street trees, and other nonvehicular infrastructure.

Policy M-3.4: Traffic Calming on Residential Streets. Encourage traffic calming strategies and incorporation of traffic calming design in residential areas to slow traffic and promote safety.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *439
Findings

Page 113 of 186 ends

Policy M-3.5: ADA Accessibility. Implement a transportation network that is safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), to allow mobility-impaired users, such as disabled persons and seniors, to safely travel within the city.

Policy M-3.6: Safe Routes to School. Provide infrastructure improvements, enforcement, and incentives to support Safe Routes to School programs and promote walking and bicycling to local schools.

Action M-3a: When planning roadway facilities, incorporate the concept of complete streets, while considering the land use and design context of the surrounding areas.

Action M-3c: Partner with Lomita school administrators to improve traffic and parking conditions in school areas, especially during school drop-off and pick-up periods.

Action M-3d: Develop strategies and guidelines to set curb use priorities that consider the needs of through traffic, transit stops, bus turnouts, passenger drop-off/pick-up, deliveries, and short-term/long-term parking, especially along major corridors.

Action M-3e: Comply with ADA requirements and design projects to remove physical barriers to accessibility in transportation systems and facilities for people with disabilities.

Policy M-9.5: Intermodal Safety. Ensure intermodal safety through development review and mitigate impediments to driveway sightlines. This may include right-of-way redesign, appropriate building orientation, driveway orientation, signage placement and size, sidewalk infrastructure such as bus stops or utility boxes, and nonstandard encroachments.

Action M-9d: Codify Public Works Right-of-Way Standards by ordinance or resolution to unify streets, remove nonstandard encroachments to improve safety, and improve sightlines. Ensure the Right-of-Way Standards are met during the entitlement process and consider proactive code enforcement.

4. Emergency Access
Threshold: Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact 4.14-31 through 4.14-32) Explanation: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in increased development which would result in new roadways and would increase the number of users on the City’s transportation system. There will be a need to ensure that adequate emergency access provisions are made to accommodate increased population and growth. Future development within the Planning Area is not anticipated to result in the substantial modification of roadways surrounding specific development sites or the placement of any permanent physical barriers on adjacent roadways. There is the potential for temporary closure of traffic lanes located immediately adjacent to a development site or otherwise controlled by construction personnel during Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *440
Findings

Page 114 of 186 ends

construction activities. However, the applicant of any proposed development would be required to submit appropriate plans for plan review to ensure compliance with zoning, building, and fire codes prior to the issuance of a building permit. Proposed developments would be required to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements and would submit construction plans to the LACoFD’s Engineering Building Plan Check Unit for review and approval prior to issuance of any building permit.

Approval by LACoFD would ensure that construction and operation of future projects associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in inadequate emergency access. In addition, the existing Safety Element and the proposed Mobility Elements developed as part of the General Plan Update contain policies in support of emergency access along local roads.

Safety Element Policy 4.3 requires that the City prioritize Capital Improvement Projects that function as evacuation routes. Action 4.3a directs the City to maintain emergency evacuation routes by ensuring that street widths, paving, and grades meet the requirements of the California State Fire Code and the Los Angeles County Fire Codes. Additionally, Mobility Element Policy M-1.6 promotes using a safe system approach to transportation planning, street design, operations, emergency response, and maintenance to improve safety on roadways. Policy M-3.5 and Action M3e promote managing and improving the City’s transportation network to be safe, accessible and consistent with ADA and to include ADA accessible features as part of roadway infrastructure projects. Policy M-9.5 ensures that the City consider intermodal safety through development review and mitigate impediments to driveway sightlines.

The implementation of goals, policies and actions contained in the General Plan Safety Element and the General Plan Update, as well as compliance with the Lomita Municipal Code would ensure that new development in the Planning Area would not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, the impact of the General Plan Update with respect to emergency access would be considered less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Goal M-1: Local Circulation System. A community served by a safe and balanced circulation system that meets the needs of all users.

Policy M-1.6: Promote Safe Streets. Use a safe systems approach for transportation planning, street design, operations, emergency response, and maintenance that proactively identifies opportunities to improve safety where conflicts between users exist to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries in our roadways.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *441
Findings

Page 115 of 186 ends

Policy M-2.1: Agency Coordination: Coordinate with neighboring cities, transportation providers, and regional agencies such as Caltrans, the County of Los Angeles, South Bay Cities Council of Governments, and Metro to meet the mobility needs of people living in, working in, or visiting Lomita.

Policy M-3.5: ADA Accessibility. Implement a transportation network that is safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), to allow mobility-impaired users, such as disabled persons and seniors, to safely travel within the city.

Action M-3d: Develop strategies and guidelines to set curb use priorities that consider the needs of through traffic, transit stops, bus turnouts, passenger drop-off/pick-up, deliveries, and short-term/long-term parking, especially along major corridors.

Action M-3e: Comply with ADA requirements and design projects to remove physical barriers to accessibility in transportation systems and facilities for people with disabilities.

Policy M-9.5: Intermodal Safety. Ensure intermodal safety through development review and mitigate impediments to driveway sightlines. This may include right-of-way redesign, appropriate building orientation, driveway orientation, signage placement and size, sidewalk infrastructure such as bus stops or utility boxes, and nonstandard encroachments.

Action M-9d: Codify Public Works Right-of-Way Standards by ordinance or resolution to unify streets, remove nonstandard encroachments to improve safety, and improve sightlines. Ensure the Right-of-Way Standards are met during the entitlement process and consider proactive code enforcement.

P. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

1. Tribal Cultural Resources
Threshold: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
• Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
• A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *442
Findings

Page 116 of 186 ends

Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impacts TCR-1 and TCR-2, pages 4.15-7 through 4.15-9)
Explanation: Effects on tribal cultural resources deemed to be significant could be considered adverse, if they involve physical demolition, destruction, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings, such that the significance of a resource would be materially impaired. While the General Plan Update does not directly propose site-specific development with the potential to directly impact a tribal cultural resource, future development allowed under the General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources. This is considered a potentially significant impact. As part of the AB 52 consultation process, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation requested to be notified of any planned ground disturbances associated with future implementation of the General Plan Update.

The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions addressing tribal cultural resources. Policy RM-2.1 directs the City to ensure the preservation of the City’s historical past.

Policy RM-2.2 requires the City to consult with Native American tribes that may be impacted by future development and land use policy changes.

Action RM-2a requires the City to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, tribal cultural, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. Action RM-2d requires the City notify appropriate tribes for consultation for the purposes of preserving or mitigating impacts to cultural places located on land within the City’s jurisdiction that may be affected by the proposed adoption, amendment to the General Plan or a specific plan. Action RM-2f requires that development proposals located in areas assessed to have moderate or high sensitivity for archaeological resources conduct a study to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if so, to identify mitigation measure to mitigate potential impacts, or to require full-time monitoring during ground disturbing activities by an archaeologist and Native American monitor. Action RM-2g requires, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, that the City halt excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains is permitted until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods, as provided in PRC Section 5097.98, or the NAHC was unable to identify a descendant or Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *443
Findings

Page 117 of 186 ends

the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being granted access to the site.

Potential impacts to tribal cultural resources associated with future development would be reduced through implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. Subsequent discretionary projects implemented in accordance with the General Plan Update would be subject to the provisions of AB 52 and may require tribal consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Planning Area and who have previously requested AB 52 consultations with the City. Future AB 52 consultation may identify tribal cultural resources not yet found and formally recorded that could be impacted by subsequent projects.

Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, and impacts would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-2.1: Preservation. Ensure the preservation of the city’s historical past.

Policy RM-2.3: Tribal Consultation. In accordance with state, local, and tribal intergovernmental consultation requirements, consult with Native American tribes that may be impacted by proposed development and land use policy changes, as necessary.

Action RM-2a: Assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, tribal cultural, and paleontological resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Action RM-2f : For all development proposals within areas assessed to have moderate or high sensitivity for archaeological resources, the City shall require either a study to be conducted by a professional archaeologist or to have full-time monitoring during grounddisturbing activities by an archaeologist and a Native American monitor. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid the impacts, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts. Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.

Action RM-2g: In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *444
Findings

Page 118 of 186 ends

cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code section 5097.98, or the Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being granted access to the site.

Q. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

1. Utilities and Service Systems
Threshold: Would the Project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-1, pages 4.16-23 through

4.16-29)
Explanation: Water
With respect to water facilities, the General Plan Update is expected to result in population and employment growth within the Planning Area, and thus, an overall increase in demand on water supply, which would necessitate construction of future water supply infrastructure. Buildout under the General Plan Update could yield a net change over existing conditions of an additional 2,885 housing units, an additional population of 7,616 people, an additional 583,431 square feet of non-residential building square footage, and an additional 853 jobs within the Planning Area. This increased demand for water infrastructure would primarily be located within areas that are already developed and serviced by the City’s Water Division.

Since no specific development projects are proposed as part of the General Plan Update, the environmental effects from constructing or expanding facilities are unknown at this time. All water infrastructure construction activities associated with future development would be subject to compliance with existing local, State, and federal laws, ordinances, and regulations, which would ensure impacts are reduced to less than significant levels. The City’s Water Division would continue to ensure adequate water distribution facilities are available to serve future development.

Furthermore, these future water facilities would be subject to General Plan Update policies and actions intended to protect the environment. Policy Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *445
Findings

Page 119 of 186 ends

RM-6.1 directs the City to coordinate with the Los Angeles RWQCB to help maintain and improve the quality of both surface water and groundwater resources. Policy RM-6.2 directs the City to promote water conservation and efficiency through education, innovation, regulation, and incentives that target all aspects of water consumption. Policy RM-6.4 encourages the City to collaborate with community partners to promote water conservation and to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of water conservation practices. Policy RM-6.6 instructs the City to invest and devote resources toward the City’s Water Division to minimize reliance on imported water and strive to develop a more effective water production and distribution system in the city. Action RM-6a directs the City to work closely with the California State Division of Drinking Water, the Los Angeles RWQCB, and other agencies to identify the potential source of benzene contamination detected at Well No. 5 through extensive testing. Action RM-6b directs the City to implement regular monitoring and reporting procedures to track water consumption trends, identify inefficiencies, and gauge the impact of water conservation measures. Action RM-6d directs the City to conduct feasibility studies to evaluate the potential for expanding recycled water infrastructure within the city. Action RM-6f directs the City to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the current water distribution system and identity areas in need of improvement to guide the development of a more efficient water distribution system. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities to a less than significant level.

Wastewater
With respect to wastewater, the General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population and employment growth within the Planning Area, and thus, an overall increase in demand on the existing sewer system associated with increased sewage flows. The General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; therefore, the environmental effects of future wastewater collection systems are unknown at this time. At the time future projects are proposed, they would be required to ensure sufficient local and trunk sewer capacity exists to serve the specific development. Pursuant to Lomita Municipal Code Section 5-2, Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste, adopts Title 20, Division 2 of the Los Angeles County Code as the Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance for the City of Lomita. The ordinance regulates discharges of wastewater, including industrial waste discharges, into sanitary sewers within the city.

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to ensure adequate wastewater services and facilities are available, and that potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of new or expanded infrastructure would be reduced. Proposed Resource Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *446
Findings

Page 120 of 186 ends

Management Element Policy RM-6.1 directs the City to coordinate with the Los Angeles RWQCB to help maintain and improve the quality of both surface water and groundwater resources. Action RM-6a directs the City to work closely with the California State Division of Drinking Water, the Los Angeles RWQCB, and other agencies to identify the potential source of benzene contamination detected at Well No. 5 through extensive testing.

The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities to a level that is less than significant. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities to a less than significant level.

Stormwater
Development under the proposed General Plan Update would result in increased areas of impervious surfaces throughout the Planning Area, resulting in the need for additional or expanded stormwater drainage, conveyance and retention infrastructure. Storm drain infrastructure in the city is jointly owned and operated by the City and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD). The infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve new growth would involve development of some facilities on-site within new development projects, some facilities off-site on appropriately designated land, and may also involve improvements to existing facilities and disturbance of existing rights-of-way. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded drainage facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the General Plan Update does not propose or approve any specific development project nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded public facilities.

Stormwater drainage and conveyance facilities would be evaluated at the project-level in association with subsequent development projects.

However, the facilities would be primarily provided on sites with land use designations that allow such uses and the environmental impacts of constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those associated with new development, redevelopment, and infrastructure projects under the General Plan. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would also be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. As such, this is a less than significant impact and no additional mitigation is required.

The General Plan Update policies and actions would further ensure that there is adequate stormwater drainage and flood control infrastructure to Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *447
Findings

Page 121 of 186 ends

serve future development under the General Plan Update and would ensure that future drainage and flood control infrastructure projects do not result in adverse environmental impacts. Policy RM-6.3 requires the City to continue the coordination with local water agencies to ensure efficient and effective management of stormwater runoff and to protect stormwater quality, in accordance with the NPDES permit. Policy RM-6.5 encourages the City to develop drought resistant landscaping for new residential and nonresidential development projects to decrease water demand, prevent erosion, reduce flooding, and limit pollutants. Action RM-6c encourages the City to conduct outreach to inform residents and businesses about the importance of stormwater management, including providing practical tips and resources to reduce local runoffs. Action RM-6e encourages the City to consider adoption of drought resistant landscape guidelines in the Zoning Code. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater facilities to a level that is less than significant.

Electrical, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
With respect to electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication services, the Planning Area is within the service areas of Southern California Edison (SCE), SoCalGas, and various telecommunication providers. New growth anticipated by the General Plan Update would require increased electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services, potentially resulting in the new construction or relocation of facilities through 2045. The environmental effects of future expansions of electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities would be evaluated with each development proposal and would require a separate environmental review related to the construction and operation of new electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure. Future implementing projects under the General Plan Update would have to coordinate with each utility provider to establish service, provide any necessary extensions of facilities, and comply with regulations in existence at that time.

As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations. Furthermore, these future facilities would be subject to General Plan Update goals and policies intended to protect the environment. Policy RM-5.1 directs the City to promote the development and use of renewable energy sources for city, residential, and business facilities. Policy RM-5.2 directs the City to promote home energy audits with regional programs, such as Energy Upgrade California or other State programs. Policy RM-5.3 directs the City to coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments and other organizations for outreach events to promote energy awareness and existing Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *448
Findings

Page 122 of 186 ends

programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency. Policy RM5.4 requires the City to ensure that residential and nonresidential development projects comply with the most current version of CALGreen.

Proposed Resource Management Element Policy RM-5.5 encourages property owners to participate in solar retrofit and other energy-efficient home improvement projects to reduce reliance on traditional energy sources. Action RM-5a directs the City to use renewable energy sources at City facilities, as feasible. Action RM-5b directs the City to organize and conduct educational workshops with utility companies informing the public of the benefits of home energy audits and energy saving practices. Action RM-5d directs the City to review development projects to ensure that all new residential and nonresidential development complies with local and state regulations regarding energy efficiency. Action RM-5e encourages the City consider adopting minimum energy efficiency requirements in the Zoning Code. The implementation of existing regulations and General Plan Update policies and actions would reduce impacts associated with the relocation or construction of new or expanded electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities to a less than significant level.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-5.1: Renewable Energy Production. Promote the development and use of renewable energy sources for city, residential, and business facilities.

Policy RM-5.2: Energy Audits. Promote home energy audits with regional programs such as Energy Upgrade California or other state programs.

Policy RM-5.3: Regional Partnerships. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments and other organizations for outreach events to promote energy awareness and existing programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency.

Policy RM-5.4: Green Building Standards. Ensure that residential and nonresidential development projects comply with the most current version of the California Green Building Standards Code.

Policy RM-5.5: Energy Upgrades. Encourage property owners to participate in solar retrofit and other energy-efficient home improvement projects to reduce reliance on traditional energy sources.

Action RM-5a: As feasible, use renewable energy sources at City facilities.

Action RM-5b: Organize and conduct educational workshops with utility companies informing the public of the benefits of home energy audits and energy saving practices.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *449
Findings

Page 123 of 186 ends

Action RM-5c: Conduct outreach events with the SBCCOG to inform residents and businesses about existing programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency.

Action RM-5d: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new residential and nonresidential development complies with local and state regulations regarding energy efficiency.

Action RM-5e: Consider adopting minimum energy efficiency requirements in the Zoning Code.

Policy RM-6.1: Regional Coordination. Continue to coordinate with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to help maintain and improve the quality of both surface water and groundwater resources.

Policy RM-6.2: Conservation Management. Promote water conservation and efficiency through education, innovation, regulation, and incentives that target all aspects of water consumption.

Policy RM-6.3: Stormwater. Coordinate with local water agencies to ensure efficient and effective management of stormwater runoff and to protect stormwater quality, in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).

Policy RM-6.4: Education. Collaborate with community partners to promote water conservation and to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of water conservation practices.

Policy RM-6.5: Landscaping. Encourage drought resistant landscaping for new residential and nonresidential development projects to decrease water demand, prevent erosion, reduce flooding, and limit pollutants.

Policy RM-6.6: Water Division. Continue to invest and devote resources toward the City’s Water Division to minimize reliance on imported water, and strive to develop a more effective water production and distribution system in the city.

Action RM-6a: Continue to work closely with the California State Division of Drinking Water, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and other agencies to identify the potential source of benzene contamination detected at Well No.5 through extensive testing. This testing may include identification and investigation of potential sources both inside and outside the city, extensive sampling, boring, and monitoring of likely sources in the area, and ongoing monitoring of soil and water levels.

Action RM-6b: Implement regular monitoring and reporting procedures to track water consumption trends, identify inefficiencies, and gauge the impact of water conservation measures.

Action RM-6c: Conduct public outreach to inform residents and businesses about the importance of stormwater management, including providing practical tips and resources to reduce local runoffs.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *450
Findings

Page 124 of 186 ends

Action RM-6d: Conduct feasibility studies to evaluate the potential for expanding recycled water infrastructure within the city.

Action RM-6e: Consider adopting the drought resistant landscape guidelines in the Zoning Code.

Action RM-6f: Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the current water distribution system, and identity areas in need of improvement to guide the development of a more efficient water distribution system.

Action RM-1i: Establish minimum open space and/or maximum lot coverage standards in the Zoning Code for new development in the city.

2. Water Supplies
Threshold: Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-2, pages 4.16-29 through

4.16-31)
Explanation: The General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population and employment growth within the Planning Area, and a corresponding increase in the demand for additional water supplies. Buildout under the General Plan could yield a net change over existing conditions of an additional 2,885 housing units, an additional population of 7,616 people, an additional 583,431 square feet of non-residential building square footage, and an additional 853 jobs within the Planning Area. Water service is provided by the City’s Water Division, along with California Water Service (CWS) for a small portion at the southwest corner of the city. The City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) concluded they will be able to meet projected future water demands under normal, dry, and multiple dry water years through 2045.

For future qualifying projects, a Water Supply Assessment would be required pursuant to SB 610 for inclusion in the project’s CEQA analysis.

The Water Supply Assessment discerns whether the expected demand from the development being proposed has been accounted for in the forecasted demands in the most recent UWMP. A Written Verification of Supply per SB 221 is prepared as a condition of approval for a subdivision map of 500 units or more. Considered a fail-safe mechanism to provide sufficient evidence that adequate water supplies are available before construction begins, the Written Verification of Supply is also prepared/adopted by the water supplier and approved by the land use authority. Depending on the project, one or both of these analyses may be required. Development proposals that may not warrant a Water Supply Assessment and/or Written Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *451
Findings

Page 125 of 186 ends

Verification of Supply, but meet the definition of a project under CEQA, would still require an analysis of sufficient water supplies in the CEQA process.

Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure that adequate water supply, treatment, and distribution capacity is available to meet the needs of the proposed development without negatively impacting the existing community. Policy RM-6.1 directs the City to coordinate with the Los Angeles RWQCB to help maintain and improve the quality of both surface water and groundwater resources. Policy RM-6.2 directs the City to promote water conservation and efficiency through education, innovation, regulation, and incentives that target all aspects of water consumption. Policy RM-6.4 encourages the City to collaborate with community partners to promote water conservation and to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of water conservation practices. Policy RM6.6 instructs the City’s to invest and devout resources toward the City’s Water Division to minimize reliance on imported water and strive to develop a more effective water production and distribution system in the city. Action RM-6a directs the City to work closely with the California State Division of Drinking Water, the Los Angeles RWQCB, and other agencies to identify the potential source of benzene contamination detected at Well No. 5 through extensive testing. Action RM-6b directs the City to implement regular monitoring and reporting procedures to track water consumption trends, identify inefficiencies, and gauge the impact of water conservation measures. Action RM-6d directs the City to conduct feasibility studies to evaluate the potential for expanding recycled water infrastructure within the city. Action RM-6f directs the City to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the current water distribution system, and identity areas in need of improvement to guide the development of a more efficient water distribution system. Through implementation of existing federal, State, and local regulations and the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, the environmental impacts related to water supplies would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Regional Coordination. Continue to coordinate with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to help maintain and improve the quality of both surface water and groundwater resources.

Policy RM-6.2: Conservation Management. Promote water conservation and efficiency through education, innovation, regulation, and incentives that target all aspects of water consumption.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *452
Findings

Page 126 of 186 ends

Policy RM-6.4: Education. Collaborate with community partners to promote water conservation and to cultivate an understanding and appreciation of water conservation practices.

Policy RM-6.6: Water Division. Continue to invest and devote resources toward the City’s Water Division to minimize reliance on imported water, and strive to develop a more effective water production and distribution system in the city.

Action RM-6a: Continue to work closely with the California State Division of Drinking Water, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and other agencies to identify the potential source of benzene contamination detected at Well No.5 through extensive testing. This testing may include identification and investigation of potential sources both inside and outside the city, extensive sampling, boring, and monitoring of likely sources in the area, and ongoing monitoring of soil and water levels.

Action RM-6b: Implement regular monitoring and reporting procedures to track water consumption trends, identify inefficiencies, and gauge the impact of water conservation measures.

Action RM-6d: Conduct feasibility studies to evaluate the potential for expanding recycled water infrastructure within the city.

Action RM-6f: Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the current water distribution system, and identity areas in need of improvement to guide the development of a more efficient water distribution system.

3. Wastewater Capacity
Threshold: Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-3, pages 4.16-30 through

4.16-31)
Explanation: The City’s local sewes discharge into Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) facilities and are conveyed for treatment at LACSD’s Warren Water Resource Facility, with a design capacity of 400 and serving a population of approximately 4.8 million people throughout Los Angeles County. The City’s proposed land use changes will produce an estimated sewer flow increase of 850 AFY (758,500 GPD). The LACSD continues to monitor and adjust its projected flows and would expand treatment capacity as needed based on these updates. The General Plan Update enables additional development but does not include specific development proposals. At the time future projects are proposed, they would require environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *453
Findings

Page 127 of 186 ends

time to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists.

Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate wastewater facilities capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand. Policy LU-4.1 directs the city to coordinate capital improvement projects and prioritize infrastructure investments that best meet the City’s critical needs. Proposed Land Use Element Policy LU-4.3 directs the City to maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate regional, State, and federal laws, to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and to implement improvements for public facilities and services in Lomita. The implementation of existing federal, State, and local regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity and impacts would be less than significant.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-4.1: Capital Improvements. Coordinate capital improvement projects and prioritize infrastructure investments that best meet the city’s most critical needs and add value to the community.

Policy LU-4.3: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate regional, state, and federal laws, to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and to implement improvements for public facilities and services in Lomita.

4. Solid Waste Generation
Threshold: Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-4, page 4.16-32 through

4.16-34)
Explanation: Future development of projects as contemplated under the General Plan Update may increase the population within the Planning Area by an additional 7,616 people. The City of Lomita has achieved a disposal rate of

2.9 PPD per resident in 2022. Assuming these disposal rates remain constant throughout the life of the General Plan Update, the new growth under General Plan buildout would result in a net increase of approximately 22,086.4 PPD of solid waste over existing conditions, which equals 11 net TPD or 4,029.6 net tons of solid waste per year. The city’s projected increase in solid waste generation associated with 2045 buildout under the General Plan Update is within the permitted capacity of the Olinda Alpha Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *454
Findings

Page 128 of 186 ends

Landfill and El Sobrante Landfill, where the vast majority of waste from the city was disposed of in 2019. Olinda Alpha Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 17.5 million cubic yards as of 2020, has a permitted a maximum throughput of 8,000 TPD, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2036. El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 143,977,170 cubic yards as of 2018, has a permitted a maximum throughput of 16,054 TPD and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2051, beyond the 20-year planning horizon of the General Plan Update. In addition, the City disposes solid waste to a number of other landfills. Conservatively assuming the Olinda Alpha Landfill reach full capacity during the 20-year planning horizon of the General Plan Update, the El Sobrante Landfill would have adequate capacity to accommodate the City’s projected solid waste generation of approximately 11 TPD through the planning horizon. Further, it is more likely that future solid waste would be distributed to the other landfills serving the City.

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to responsibly manage and reduce solid waste. Policy RM- 7.1 directs the City to comply with local, regional, and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting. RM-7.2 directs the City to provide adequate solid waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for current and future residents and businesses. Policy RM-7.4 encourages development projects to divert most of their construction waste debris away from landfills. Policy RM-7.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste. Policy RM-7.6 encourages collaboration with community partners to promote waste reduction strategies to the community. Action RM-7a directs the City to comply with State law to ensure solid waste collection activities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Action RM-7b directs the City to regularly monitor the level of services provided by waste and recycling collection contractors to ensure that service levels meet the terms of the contract. Action RM-7d encourages the City to coordinate with developers and contractors to identify opportunities for waste diversion and recycling during the project construction phase. Action RM-7e encourages the City to work with the school district, community organizations, and businesses to develop educational programs on waste reduction strategies. Through compliance with applicable regulations, including those related to recycling and solid waste diversion, as well as implementation of regulations and policies included in the General Plan Update, Project implementation would be consistent with solid waste reduction statutes and regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant impact, and no mitigation measures are required.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *455
Findings

Page 129 of 186 ends

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-7.1: Compliance. Ensure compliance with local, regional, and state regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.

Policy RM-7.2: Solid Waste Collection. Ensure adequate solid waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for current and future residents and businesses.

Policy RM-7.4: Construction Waste Reduction. Encourage development projects to divert most of their construction waste debris away from landfills.

Policy RM-7.5: Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste.

Policy RM-7.6: Education. Collaborate with community partners to promote waste reduction strategies to the community.

Action RM-7a: Continue to comply with state law to ensure solid waste collection activities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan.

Action RM-7b: Regularly monitor the level of services provided by waste and recycling collection contractors to ensure that service levels meet the terms of the contract.

Action RM-7d: Coordinate with developers and contractors to identify opportunities for waste diversion and recycling during the project construction phase.

Action RM-7e: Work with the school district, community organizations, and businesses to develop educational programs on waste reduction strategies.

5. Solid Waste Regulations
Threshold: Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Finding: Less than significant. (Draft EIR, Impact USS-5, pages 4.16-34 through

4.16-36)
Explanation: Lomita Municipal Code Section 5-5.05, WMP Compliance Report, lists the diversion requirements for construction and demolition debris that will ensure the City to be compliant with CALGreen and allow the City to better document diversion efforts in compliance with AB 939. Additionally, Lomita Municipal Code Section 5-3, Integrated Waste Management, establishes mandatory solid waste and recycling collection to comply with the requirements of AB 939. The City has also established disposal and Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *456
Findings

Page 130 of 186 ends

mandatory recycling requirements for commercial facilities, single family residential, and multifamily residential premises to comply with State law diversion requirements. As permitted by AB 939, the City authorizes a private solid waste franchisee (i.e., Athens Services) to handle the city’s solid waste and requires Athens Services to cooperate in the preparation of solid waste disposal characterization studies and the preparation of waste stream audits. Athens Services and the City work together to submit information to meet the reporting requirements of AB 939, local diversion requirements, or any other law or regulation, to reach the solid waste and recycling goals mandated by AB 939.

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to responsibly manage and reduce solid waste in compliance with federal, State, and local regulations. Policy RM- 7.1 directs the City comply with local, regional, and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting. Policy RM-7.2 directs the City to provide adequate solid waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for current and future residents and businesses. Policy RM-7.3 encourages the City to promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste through education, monitoring, and enforcement of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.

Policy RM-7.4 encourages development projects to divert most of their construction waste debris away from landfills. Policy RM-7.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste. Policy RM-7.6 encourages collaboration with community partners to promote waste reduction strategies to the community. Action RM-7a directs the City to comply with State law to ensure solid waste collection activities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Action RM-7b directs the City to regularly monitor the level of services provided by waste and recycling collection contractors to ensure that service levels meet the terms of the contract. Action RM-7c directs the City to use educational flyers and workshops to inform residents of the proper method to dispose hazardous waste that includes paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste, construction waste, and electronic waste. Action RM-7d encourages the City to coordinate with developers and contractors to identify opportunities for waste diversion and recycling during the project construction phase. Action RM-7e encourages the City to work with the school district, community organizations, and businesses to develop educational programs on waste reduction strategies. Through compliance with existing regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions, future development implemented by the General Plan Update would be required to comply with management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and impacts would be less than significant.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *457
Findings

Page 131 of 186 ends

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-7.1: Compliance. Ensure compliance with local, regional, and state regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling, and composting.

Policy RM-7.2: Solid Waste Collection. Ensure adequate solid waste disposal, recycling, and refuse services for current and future residents and businesses.

Policy RM-7.3: Hazardous Waste. Promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste through education, monitoring, and enforcement of proper use, storage, handling, and disposal.

Policy RM-7.4: Construction Waste Reduction. Encourage development projects to divert most of their construction waste debris away from landfills.

Policy RM-7.5: Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste.

Policy RM-7.6: Education. Collaborate with community partners to promote waste reduction strategies to the community.

Action RM-7a: Continue to comply with state law to ensure solid waste collection activities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan.

Action RM-7b: Regularly monitor the level of services provided by waste and recycling collection contractors to ensure that service levels meet the terms of the contract.

Action RM-7c: Use educational flyers and workshops to inform residents of the proper method to dispose hazardous waste that includes paint, tires, medications, medical sharps, infectious waste, asbestos waste, construction waste, and electronic waste.

Action RM-7d: Coordinate with developers and contractors to identify opportunities for waste diversion and recycling during the project construction phase.

Action RM-7e: Work with the school district, community organizations, and businesses to develop educational programs on waste reduction strategies.

R. WILDFIRE
Threshold: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *458
Findings

Page 132 of 186 ends

Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Finding: No Impact. (Draft EIR, pages 7.0-3 through 7.0-4) Explanation: The Planning Area is not located within an State Responsibility Area (“SRA”) and is not located within a VHFHSZ within an Local Responsibility Area (“LRA”). The site of the Cypress Water Production Facility is within a recommended VHFHSZ. The Planning Area and surrounding area are relatively flat and do not contain any slopes or features that would exacerbate wildfire risks. The Planning Area is urbanized and developed. Potential residential development would not require the installation or maintenance of infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. No impact would occur in this regard.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *459
Findings

Page 133 of 186 ends

SECTION III

IMPACTS THAT ARE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION

INCORPORATED
There are no impacts that require mitigation above and beyond implementation of the policies and actions included in the General Plan.

SECTION IV

IMPACTS THAN CANNOT BE FULLY MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN

SIGNIFICANT LEVEL
The City Council hereby finds that, despite the incorporation of General Plan goals, policies, and actions identified in the EIR and in these Findings, the following environmental impacts cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level and a Statement of Overriding Considerations is therefore included herein:

A. AIR QUALITY

1. Cumulatively Considerable Pollutant Emissions
Threshold: Would the project result in cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under the applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-2, pages 4.2-39 through 4.2-46)
Explanation: The SCAQMD has established numerical significance thresholds for regional emissions during construction and operation. Daily emissions were estimated for the construction of the land uses provided in the General Plan Update. The calculations used to develop construction emissions incorporate compliance with applicable dust control measures required to be implemented during each phase of construction by SCAQMD Rule 403 (Control of Fugitive Dust), and fugitive VOC control measures required to be implemented by architectural coating emission factors based on SCAQMD Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings); however, the constructionrelated daily emissions would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Therefore, short-term regional construction emissions would be potentially significant. Additionally, operation of future development accommodated by the General Plan Update would generate criteria air pollutant emissions from project-generated vehicle trips traveling within the City, energy sources such as natural gas combustion, and area sources such as landscaping equipment and consumer products usage. Operational emissions for future development accommodated by the General Plan Update would exceed regulatory thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. While these thresholds are the only thresholds available for numerically determining significance, it Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *460
Findings

Page 134 of 186 ends

should be noted that these thresholds were specifically developed for use in determining significance for individual projects and not for program-level documents, such as the General Plan Update. However, as emissions for VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 exceed regulatory thresholds, the regional operational emissions would be potentially significant. With respect to operational emissions, future development under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the General Plan Update’s policies and actions. The proposed policies and actions of the General Plan Update listed below would potentially reduce emissions, which could potentially address impacts related to conflicts with an applicable air quality plan. For instance, the General Plan Update includes:
proposed Resource Management Element Policy RM-3.1, which directs to the City to coordinate with State and regional agencies, such as the SCAQMD, SCAG, SBCCOG, and CARB to address air quality issues; Policy RM-3.2, which requires the City to reduce concentrated air pollution and the incidence of respiratory illness through the land use planning process by diversifying the land use mix, bringing compatible uses closer together, reducing VMT, and applying other similar measures; and the policies under the proposed General Plan Update Land Use Element Goal LU-1, which promotes balanced land use patterns. These policies and actions are oriented toward the reduction of the air quality impacts of individual projects.

With respect to operational emissions, future development under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with the AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the General Plan Update’s policies and actions. However, as there is no way to determine the effectiveness of such regulations, policies, and actions for individual projects, it is impossible to determine if potential impacts would be reduced to below regulatory thresholds. For construction emissions, the policies and actions of the General Plan listed below would reduce operational emissions. For example, the General Plan Update includes Policy LU-1.1 through Policy LU-1.8, which encourage a balanced land use pattern that would promote a reduction in overall vehicle trips and VMT.

Mobility Element Goal M-1 and the policies under it would promote a multi-modal circulation system, which would encourage a reduction on single-occupancy vehicle trips. Goal M-6 promotes pedestrian and bicycle transportation as alternative transportation options. Policy M-9.2 promotes TDM to further reduce operational VMT. Proposed Resource Management Element Policy RM-4.4 promotes continued investment in public infrastructure that supports the use of energy efficient or low-emission transportation. The policies under Goal RM-5 promote more careful and efficient use of energy resources, including Policy RM-5.1, which promotes renewable energy production.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *461
Findings

Page 135 of 186 ends

There are no feasible criteria air pollutant reduction measures beyond those identified within the policies and actions listed above and those listed below, that would reduce impacts. While implementation of these General Plan Updated goals, policies, and actions would reduce criteria pollutant emissions, the extent of impact reduction would be determined on a projectby-project basis, as necessary. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU-1: Balanced Land Use Pattern. Preserve a balanced land use pattern that meets the diverse needs of Lomita’s residents and businesses, providing a range of housing options, offering a variety of employment and recreation opportunities, and promoting a robust local economy.

Policy LU-1.1: Land Planning. Promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable; enhances community livability and public health; offers choices in housing, jobs, amenities, and transportation; reduces pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and the expenditure of non-renewable resources; and provides opportunities for meaningful public engagement in land use decisions.

Policy LU-1.2: Focused Growth. Focus new higher density mixed-use development along major corridors and within key activity nodes to expand housing opportunity, preserve the character of existing single-family neighborhoods, promote active transportation options, and enhance economic vitality.

Policy LU-1.3: Employment/Housing Balance. Strive to balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for residents to work locally, reduce commute times, and improve air quality.

Policy LU-1.4: Thriving Downtown. Promote economic opportunities in Downtown Lomita through a mixture of housing, destination-type commercial uses, eateries, entertainment, and civic uses such as cultural and performing arts facilities. Support pedestrian-friendly and human-scaled development within the downtown area to reduce vehicle trips and parking demand.

Policy LU-1.5: Neighborhood-Serving Uses. Support the development of neighborhoodscaled retail and service uses nearby residences to meet daily needs and reduce vehicle trips.

Policy LU-1.6: Capture Local Spending. Encourage the development of a broad range of commercial uses that capture a greater share of local spending and reduce residents’ reliance upon travel to nearby communities.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *462
Findings

Page 136 of 186 ends

Policy LU-1.8: Mixed-Use. Create opportunities for development projects that mix housing with commercial uses to enable Lomita’s residents to live close to businesses and employment, improving multi-modal travel and increasing social interaction.

Action LU-1a: Update the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Title XI, Chapter 1 of the Lomita Municipal Code) and Zoning Map as appropriate to ensure consistency with this Land Use Element and designations shown on the Land Use Map (Figure LU-1). As part of the update, address the following items:
a. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include new mixed-use zones and associated development standards and land use regulations, to implement the MU30, MU40, and MU70 land use designations and reflect the development densities and intensities of those designations. Moreover, amend the Zoning Map to apply the new zones to specific parcels within the city.
b. Reevaluate the permitted uses in the Downtown, Commercial (D-C) zone to ensure that they reflect the mix of retail, commercial, restaurant, office, service, etc. uses desired by the community for the downtown.
c. Ensure that minimum lot sizes for new mixed-use developments are adhered to.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Goal M-1: Local Circulation System. A community served by a safe and balanced circulation system that meets the needs of all users.

Policy M-1.6: Promote Safe Streets. Use a safe systems approach for transportation planning, street design, operations, emergency response, and maintenance that proactively identifies opportunities to improve safety where conflicts between users exist to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries in our roadways.

Policy M-1.7: Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Use traffic calming strategies such as signage, speed radar feedback signs, curb extensions, and deflections, as recommended in the City’s Traffic Calming Toolkit, to create a pedestrianfriendly circulation system and promote safety, while not reducing parking supply.

Policy M-1.8: Transportation Demand Management. Encourage the preparation of Transportation Demand Management plans for all major developments or facility expansions to encourage ride-sharing and other improvements, thereby reducing vehicle trips.

Action M-1e: Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential local effects on vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities and operations, and seek funding to invest in associated infrastructure and technologies such as Traffic System Management (TSM) and traffic signal synchronization.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *463
Findings

Page 137 of 186 ends

Action M-1f: Evaluate the applicability of traffic calming tools to minimize cut-through traffic on local streets, especially in residential areas and near schools, and implement improvements as necessary.

Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A community with a well-designed and built transportation network that is safe, accessible, comfortable, and convenient for all transportation modes and users.

Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets for Roadway Projects. Apply complete streets principles to all transportation improvement projects (e.g., safety, intelligent transportation systems, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities) to accommodate the needs of street users of all ages and abilities.

Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Connectivity. Link activity centers, employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities.

Policy M-3.3: Streetscape Improvements. Require roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety, including street lighting, wayfinding, street trees, and other nonvehicular infrastructure.

Policy M-3.4: Traffic Calming on Residential Streets. Encourage traffic calming strategies and incorporation of traffic calming design in residential areas to slow traffic and promote safety.

Policy M-3.5: ADA Accessibility. Implement a transportation network that is safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), to allow mobility-impaired users, such as disabled persons and seniors, to safely travel within the city.

Policy M-3.6: Safe Routes to School. Provide infrastructure improvements, enforcement, and incentives to support Safe Routes to School programs and promote walking and bicycling to local schools.

Policy M-3.7: Right-of-Way Design. Ensure the City is fully utilizing legal right-of-way to provide space for an appropriate mix of streetscape elements.

Action M-3a: When planning roadway facilities, incorporate the concept of complete streets, while considering the land use and design context of the surrounding areas.

Action M-3b: Periodically review and update the City’s Right-of-Way Standards to ensure that the standards reflect the City’s goals and policies for the circulation system.

Action M-3c: Partner with Lomita school administrators to improve traffic and parking conditions in school areas, especially during school drop-off and pick-up periods.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *464
Findings

Page 138 of 186 ends

Action M-3d: Develop strategies and guidelines to set curb use priorities that consider the needs of through traffic, transit stops, bus turnouts, passenger drop-off/pick-up, deliveries, and short-term/long-term parking, especially along major corridors.

Goal M-5: Transit. A community connected to a comprehensive public transportation system.

Policy M-5.1: Transit Use. Support programs encouraging public transit use by people living in, working in, or visiting Lomita.

Policy M-5.2: Improve Local Public Transit Service. Work with Metro, Torrance Transit, and other local public transit providers to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities, including bus stops, in the city.

Policy M-5.3: Transit Facilities. Require new developments to construct, when appropriate, transit facilities, including bus turn-outs, bus stop infrastructure, and route information signage.

Policy M-5.4: Effects of New Technologies on Transit Use. Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential effects on transit demand and how users access public transit.

Action M-5a: Continue on-going coordination with transit authorities toward the expansion of transit facilities.

Action M-5b: Work with transit providers to increase transit service frequency, speed, and reliability and increase ridership and to strengthen linkages and access to key destinations.

Action M-5c: Explore new intracity transit options such as a Lomita trolley to transport individuals between commercial areas, residential areas, and parks.

Goal M-6: Active Transportation. A community with a comprehensive network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities that encourages active transportation.

Policy M-6.1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to provide active transportation facilities that can serve as an alternative to automobiles, including the Plan’s facility recommendations as shown in Figure M-2.

Policy M-6.2: Local Travel Network. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote local micromobility modes by implementing the Local Travel Network plan and supporting efforts to integrate the network with adjacent cities, as shown in Figure M-3.

Policy M-6.3: Sidewalk and Bikeway Gaps. Create a connected and complete active transportation network by identifying and eliminating gaps in sidewalks and bikeways, evaluating the adequacy of existing urban trails, and prioritizing sidewalk maintenance.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *465
Findings

Page 139 of 186 ends

Policy M-6.4: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities at New Developments. Require new residential and non-residential developments in the city to provide safe and attractive bicycle and pedestrian facilities, such as secure bicycle parking, pedestrian-scale lighting, street furniture, landscaping, and other improvements.

Policy M-6.5: Effects of New Technologies on Active Transportation. Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential effects on designing a transportation network that accommodates all modes and users.

Action M-6a: As part of development review and specific plans, require land development projects to provide connectivity and accessibility to a mix of uses such as schools, parks, work, and shopping destinations that meet residents’ daily needs including secure parking and safety measures.

Action M-6b: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code, as necessary, to consider bicycle and pedestrian access as part of the site plan review for new development projects.

Action M-6c: Dedicate capital improvement funding for citywide projects including pedestrian refuge islands, raised crosswalks, or other relevant crosswalk enhancements as they become available.

Action M-6d: Require that all roadway resurfacing projects and land development projects with impacts to roadways be subject to a review process that considers lane reconfiguration and other opportunities to improve the bicycle and pedestrian network.

Goal M-9: Transportation Management. A community with transportation management strategies that contribute to achieving regional and statewide greenhouse gas emissions targets.

Policy M-9.1: Vehicle Miles Traveled Guidelines. Require vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City shall continue to maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards for the purposes of planning and designing street improvements.

Policy M-9.2: Transportation Demand Management. Require transportation demand management (TDM) strategies as mitigation measures for new projects that exceed the City’s VMT impact thresholds.

Policy M-9.3: Regional Coordination. Encourage regional agencies such as Metro, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote TDM programs that reduce single-occupancy vehicle travel.

Policy M-9.4: New Development. Work with developers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage public and active modes of travel.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *466
Findings

Page 140 of 186 ends

Action M-9a: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code and related implementation documents, as necessary, to reflect TDM best practices.

Action M-9b: Require developments that are approved based on TDM plans to incorporate monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.

Action M-9c: Consider adoption of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) guidelines and thresholds for transportation analysis for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal RM-3: Air Quality. Improve air quality and reduce air pollutant emissions.

Policy RM-3.1: Regional Air Quality. Coordinate with state and regional agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to address air quality issues.

Policy RM-3.2: Land Use Planning. Reduce concentrated air pollution and the incidence of respiratory illness through the land use planning process by diversifying the land use mix, bringing compatible uses closer together, reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and applying other similar measures.

Policy RM-3.3: Stationary and Mobile Sources. Seek to reduce air pollutant emissions through regulation of stationary and mobile sources of air pollution, as feasible.

Policy RM-3.4: Sustainable Technology. Encourage new and emerging technologies that could decrease air pollution.

Policy RM-3.5: Public Education. Raise public awareness of the impacts of air pollution on physical health and the environment.

Policy RM-3.6: Grant Funding. Explore grant funding from state, federal, and nongovernmental organizations for clean air projects to improve air quality and decrease air pollutant emissions.

Action M-3a: Coordinate with the SCAQMD to further reduce smog pollution and mitigate major stationary sources of air pollution in the city.

Action M-3b: As applicable, review new residential and nonresidential development projects during the CEQA process for potential air quality impacts to residences and other sensitive receptors.

Action M-3c: Integrate smart technology equipment into urban infrastructure that can monitor and provide real time air quality data.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *467
Findings

Page 141 of 186 ends

Action M-3d: Conduct educational outreach to residential and business community stakeholders about air quality standards, air pollution impact on physical health and the environment, and best practices to improve overall air quality.

Action M-3e: Identify state, federal, and non-governmental organizations that provide grant funding for clean air projects.

Goal RM-4: Greenhouse Gas Reduction. Commit to reducing municipal greenhouse gas emissions and achieving a low carbon future.

Policy RM-4.1: Low-carbon Municipality. Demonstrate environmental leadership and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from municipal facilities and operations by at least 49% below 2005 levels by 2035, in conjunction with the City’s 2018 Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Policy RM-4.2: GHG Inventory. Update the community and municipal GHG inventories every five years to track progress toward achieving the City’s GHG reduction goal.

Policy RM-4.3: Development Standards. Require residential and nonresidential development projects to implement sustainable development standards to decrease greenhouse gas emissions.

Policy RM-4.4: Sustainable Infrastructure. Continue to invest in public infrastructure that supports the use of energy efficient or low-emission transportation.

Policy RM-4.5: State and Federal Targets. Review existing City practices to identify methods to decrease overall greenhouse gas emissions.

Policy RM-4.6: City Contractors. Encourage contractors to use low-emission equipment and vehicles for City construction projects.

Action RM-4a: Implement the local GHG reduction measures identified in the City of Lomita 2018 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and perform on-going monitoring and reporting of GHG reduction impacts.

Action RM-4b: Continue to participate in the South Bay Cities Council of Governments’ (SBCCOG) climate action planning process and update Lomita’s CAP at least every five years.

Action RM-4c: Explore incentives for city contractors who invest in and use low-emission equipment and vehicles for city infrastructure projects or establish minimum requirements in the Municipal Code.

Goal RM-5: Sustainability/Energy Resources. Carefully and safely manage energy resources, embracing sustainable practices for long-term vitality.

Policy RM-5.1: Renewable Energy Production. Promote the development and use of renewable energy sources for city, residential, and business facilities.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *468
Findings

Page 142 of 186 ends

Policy RM-5.2: Energy Audits. Promote home energy audits with regional programs such as Energy Upgrade California or other state programs.

Policy RM-5.3: Regional Partnerships. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments and other organizations for outreach events to promote energy awareness and existing programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency.

Policy RM-5.4: Green Building Standards. Ensure that residential and nonresidential development projects comply with the most current version of the California Green Building Standards Code.

Policy RM-5.5: Energy Upgrades. Encourage property owners to participate in solar retrofit and other energy-efficient home improvement projects to reduce reliance on traditional energy sources.

Action RM-5a: As feasible, use renewable energy sources at City facilities.

Action RM-5b: Organize and conduct educational workshops with utility companies informing the public of the benefits of home energy audits and energy saving practices.

Action RM-5c: Conduct outreach events with the SBCCOG to inform residents and businesses about existing programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency.

Action RM-5d: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new residential and nonresidential development complies with local and state regulations regarding energy efficiency.

Action RM-5e: Consider adopting minimum energy efficiency requirements in the Zoning Code.

2. Sensitive Receptors
Threshold: Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact AQ-3, pages 4.2-43 through 4.2-45)
Explanation: Criteria air pollutant emissions have the potential to result in health impacts on sensitive receptors located near new development within the Planning Area. Based on the nature and extent of new development, nearby sensitive receptors could be exposed to levels of toxic air contaminants that could result in a potential increase in cancer, acute, and/or chronic risk. Because the exact nature, location, and operation of the future developments are unknown, and because health risk impacts from TACs are cumulative over the life of the nearby receptors, quantification of potential health risks would be speculative. However, as construction and operation of these future developments would occur within close proximity to sensitive Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *469
Findings

Page 143 of 186 ends

receptors, there is the potential for risk to exceed regulatory levels.

Additionally, without knowing the exact specifications for all projects that may be developed under the General Plan Update, there is no way to accurately calculate the potential for health impacts from the overall General Plan Update. Individual projects would be required to provide their own environmental assessments to determine health impacts from the construction and operation of their projects. The proposed policies of the General Plan Update would potentially reduce emissions, which could potentially reduce impacts related to conflicts with an applicable air quality plan. Goal LU-1 requires the City to implement a balanced land use pattern.

Policy LU-1.1 requires the City to promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable. Policy LU-1.2 requires the City to focus new higher density mixed-use development along major corridors and within key activity nodes to expand housing opportunity, preserve the character of existing singlefamily neighborhoods, promote active transportation options, and enhance economic vitality. Policy M-1.8 encourages the preparation of TDM plans for all major developments or facility expansions to encourage ride-sharing and other improvements, thereby reducing vehicle trips. Goal M-3 encourages the development of complete streets. Policy M-5.1 requires the City to work with Metro, Torrance Transit, and other local public transit providers to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities, including bus stops, in the city. Policy M-6.1 encourages the City to implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to provide active transportation facilities that can serve as an alternative to automobiles.

Policy M-9.4 encourages the City to work with developers to reduce GHG emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage public and active modes of travel.

However, the exact location, type, nature, and size of future projects that may expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations cannot be calculated at this time, as the details of potential future projects are not currently known. As such, there is no way to determine the extent to which these regulations will be, or need to be, implemented, and it is impossible to determine if potential impacts would be reduced to below regulatory thresholds. Additionally, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond the policies and actions listed in the General Plan Update. Therefore, localized operational impacts, construction and operational health and toxic air impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

Refer to the General Plan Update goals, policies and actions listed above under Impact Statement AQ-2, Cumulatively Considerable Pollutant Emissions.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *470
Findings

Page 144 of 186 ends

B. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

1. Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Threshold: Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impacts GHG-1 and GHG-2, pages 4.7-21 through 4.7-40)
Explanation: Implementation of the proposed Project would contribute to increases of GHG emissions that are associated with global climate change. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of CO2 and other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), from mobile sources and utility usage. Lomita’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) includes quantification of baseline GHG emissions, the establishment of GHG emissions targets that demonstrate a level at which the contribution of GHG emissions from activities covered by the CAP would not be cumulatively considerable, and forecasts for future year GHG emissions.

In 2015, the City set GHG emission reduction goals consistent with the State’s AB 32 GHG emission reduction targets. The City’s target was calculated as a 15 percent decrease from 2005 levels by 2020 as recommended in the B 32 Scoping Plan. A longer-term goal was established for 2035 to reduce emissions by 49 percent below 2005 levels. These goals put the City on a path towards helping the State meet its long-term 2050 goal to reduce emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels.

Compliance with applicable State standards would ensure consistency with State and regional GHG reduction planning efforts. The goals stated in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS helped determine consistency with the planning efforts previously stated. The proposed Project would be consistent with the stated goals of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts or interfere with SCAG’s ability to achieve the region’s post-2020 mobile source GHG reduction targets.

In order to further reduce GHG emissions associated with buildout of the General Plan Update, the City has included numerous goals, policies and actions in the General Plan Update aimed at reducing GHG emissions and promoting sustainability in the Planning Area. The General Plan Update proposes goals, policies and actions that are relevant to climate change and GHG emissions, including encouraging land use patterns that reduce mobile energy consumption within the Planning Area. Land Use Element Goal LU- Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *471
Findings

Page 145 of 186 ends

1 requires the City to implement a balanced land use pattern. Policy LU-1.1 requires the City to promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable. Policy LU1.2 requires the City to focus new higher density mixed-use development along major corridors and within key activity nodes to expand housing opportunity, preserve the character of existing single-family neighborhoods, promote active transportation options, and enhance economic vitality. Proposed Mobility Element Policy M-1.8 encourages the preparation of TDM plans for all major developments or facility expansions to encourage ride-sharing and other improvements, thereby reducing vehicle trips. Goal M-3 encourages the development of complete streets.

Policy M-5.1 requires the City to work with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority (Metro), Torrance Transit, and other local public transit providers to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities, including bus stops, in the city. Policy M-6.1 encourages the City to implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to provide active transportation facilities that can serve as an alternative to automobiles.

Policy M-9.4, which encourages the City to work with developers to reduce GHG emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage public and active modes of travel.

Furthermore, numerous policies and programs other avenues for reducing GHGs in the Planning Area. Resource Management Element Policy RM3.4 encourages new and emerging technologies that could decrease air pollution (including GHGs). Goal RM-4 commits the City to reducing municipal GHG emissions and achieving a low carbon future. Further, Policy RM-4.1 requires the City to demonstrate environmental leadership and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from municipal facilities and operations by at least 49 percent below 2005 levels by 2035, in conjunction with the City’s 2018 CAP. Additionally, Policy RM-4.2 requires the City to update the community and municipal GHG inventories every five years to track progress toward achieving the City’s GHG reduction goal. Moreover, Policy RM-4.3 requires residential and nonresidential development projects to implement sustainable development standards to decrease GHG emissions. Action RM-4a requires the City to implement the local GHG reduction measures identified in the City of Lomita 2018 CAP and perform on-going monitoring and reporting of GHG reduction impacts. Goal RM-5 further requires the City to carefully and safely manage energy resources, embracing sustainable practices for long-term vitality. Policy RM-5.1 promotes the development and use of renewable energy sources for city, residential, and business facilities. Other policies and actions that would reduce GHGs are provided below.

Overall, the proposed Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the State of California and the SCAQMD aimed at the reduction Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *472
Findings

Page 146 of 186 ends

of air pollutant emissions, as described above. While compliance with relevant regulations and implementation of the proposed General Plan Updates’ goals, policies and actions would reduce GHG emissions, the associated reductions of GHG emissions are not quantifiable. Therefore, it cannot be guaranteed that the implementation of the General Plan Update, as well as the individual development projects associated with implementation of the proposed Project, would generate emissions consistent with the State’s long-term goals for reducing GHG emissions in the State of California, particularly the net-zero target as promulgated under AB 1279. As such, the City cannot state with certainty whether implementation of the General Plan Update would meet the State’s community emissions target. The proposed Project would result in a significant and unavoidable adverse impact related to GHG emissions.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU-1: Balanced Land Use Pattern. Preserve a balanced land use pattern that meets the diverse needs of Lomita’s residents and businesses, providing a range of housing options, offering a variety of employment and recreation opportunities, and promoting a robust local economy.

Policy LU-1.1: Land Planning. Promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable; enhances community livability and public health; offers choices in housing, jobs, amenities, and transportation; reduces pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and the expenditure of non-renewable resources; and provides opportunities for meaningful public engagement in land use decisions.

Policy LU-1.2: Focused Growth. Focus new higher density mixed-use development along major corridors and within key activity nodes to expand housing opportunity, preserve the character of existing single-family neighborhoods, promote active transportation options, and enhance economic vitality.

Policy LU-1.3: Employment/Housing Balance. Strive to balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for residents to work locally, reduce commute times, and improve air quality.

Policy LU-1.4: Thriving Downtown. Promote economic opportunities in Downtown Lomita through a mixture of housing, destination-type commercial uses, eateries, entertainment, and civic uses such as cultural and performing arts facilities. Support pedestrian-friendly and human-scaled development within the downtown area to reduce vehicle trips and parking demand.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *473
Findings

Page 147 of 186 ends

Policy LU-1.5: Neighborhood-Serving Uses. Support the development of neighborhoodscaled retail and service uses nearby residences to meet daily needs and reduce vehicle trips.

Policy LU-1.6: Capture Local Spending. Encourage the development of a broad range of commercial uses that capture a greater share of local spending and reduce residents’ reliance upon travel to nearby communities.

Policy LU-1.8: Mixed-Use. Create opportunities for development projects that mix housing with commercial uses to enable Lomita’s residents to live close to businesses and employment, improving multi-modal travel and increasing social interaction.

Action LU-1a: Update the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Title XI, Chapter 1 of the Lomita Municipal Code) and Zoning Map as appropriate to ensure consistency with this Land Use Element and designations shown on the Land Use Map (Figure LU-1). As part of the update, address the following items:
a. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include new mixed-use zones and associated development standards and land use regulations, to implement the MU30, MU40, and MU70 land use designations and reflect the development densities and intensities of those designations. Moreover, amend the Zoning Map to apply the new zones to specific parcels within the city.
b. Reevaluate the permitted uses in the Downtown, Commercial (D-C) zone to ensure that they reflect the mix of retail, commercial, restaurant, office, service, etc. uses desired by the community for the downtown.
c. Ensure that minimum lot sizes for new mixed-use developments are adhered to.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Goal M-1: Local Circulation System. A community served by a safe and balanced circulation system that meets the needs of all users.

Policy M-1.6: Promote Safe Streets. Use a safe systems approach for transportation planning, street design, operations, emergency response, and maintenance that proactively identifies opportunities to improve safety where conflicts between users exist to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries in our roadways.

Policy M-1.7: Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Use traffic calming strategies such as signage, speed radar feedback signs, curb extensions, and deflections, as recommended in the City’s Traffic Calming Toolkit, to create a pedestrianfriendly circulation system and promote safety, while not reducing parking supply.

Policy M-1.8: Transportation Demand Management. Encourage the preparation of Transportation Demand Management plans for all major developments or facility expansions to encourage ride-sharing and other improvements, thereby reducing vehicle trips.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *474
Findings

Page 148 of 186 ends

Action M-1e: Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential local effects on vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities and operations, and seek funding to invest in associated infrastructure and technologies such as Traffic System Management (TSM) and traffic signal synchronization.

Action M-1f: Evaluate the applicability of traffic calming tools to minimize cut-through traffic on local streets, especially in residential areas and near schools, and implement improvements as necessary.

Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A community with a well-designed and built transportation network that is safe, accessible, comfortable, and convenient for all transportation modes and users.

Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets for Roadway Projects. Apply complete streets principles to all transportation improvement projects (e.g., safety, intelligent transportation systems, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities) to accommodate the needs of street users of all ages and abilities.

Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Connectivity. Link activity centers, employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities.

Policy M-3.3: Streetscape Improvements. Require roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety, including street lighting, wayfinding, street trees, and other nonvehicular infrastructure.

Policy M-3.4: Traffic Calming on Residential Streets. Encourage traffic calming strategies and incorporation of traffic calming design in residential areas to slow traffic and promote safety.

Policy M-3.5: ADA Accessibility. Implement a transportation network that is safe, accessible, and consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), to allow mobility-impaired users, such as disabled persons and seniors, to safely travel within the city.

Policy M-3.6: Safe Routes to School. Provide infrastructure improvements, enforcement, and incentives to support Safe Routes to School programs and promote walking and bicycling to local schools.

Policy M-3.7: Right-of-Way Design. Ensure the City is fully utilizing legal right-of-way to provide space for an appropriate mix of streetscape elements.

Action M-3a: When planning roadway facilities, incorporate the concept of complete streets, while considering the land use and design context of the surrounding areas.

Action M-3b: Periodically review and update the City’s Right-of-Way Standards to ensure that the standards reflect the City’s goals and policies for the circulation system.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *475
Findings

Page 149 of 186 ends

Action M-3c: Partner with Lomita school administrators to improve traffic and parking conditions in school areas, especially during school drop-off and pick-up periods.

Action M-3d: Develop strategies and guidelines to set curb use priorities that consider the needs of through traffic, transit stops, bus turnouts, passenger drop-off/pick-up, deliveries, and short-term/long-term parking, especially along major corridors.

Goal M-5: Transit. A community connected to a comprehensive public transportation system.

Policy M-5.1: Transit Use. Support programs encouraging public transit use by people living in, working in, or visiting Lomita.

Policy M-5.2: Improve Local Public Transit Service. Work with Metro, Torrance Transit, and other local public transit providers to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities, including bus stops, in the city.

Policy M-5.3: Transit Facilities. Require new developments to construct, when appropriate, transit facilities, including bus turn-outs, bus stop infrastructure, and route information signage.

Policy M-5.4: Effects of New Technologies on Transit Use. Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential effects on transit demand and how users access public transit.

Action M-5a: Continue on-going coordination with transit authorities toward the expansion of transit facilities.

Action M-5b: Work with transit providers to increase transit service frequency, speed, and reliability and increase ridership and to strengthen linkages and access to key destinations.

Action M-5c: Explore new intracity transit options such as a Lomita trolley to transport individuals between commercial areas, residential areas, and parks.

Goal M-6: Active Transportation. A community with a comprehensive network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities that encourages active transportation.

Policy M-6.1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to provide active transportation facilities that can serve as an alternative to automobiles, including the Plan’s facility recommendations as shown in Figure M-2.

Policy M-6.2: Local Travel Network. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote local micromobility modes by implementing the Local Travel Network plan and supporting efforts to integrate the network with adjacent cities, as shown in Figure M-3.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *476
Findings

Page 150 of 186 ends

Policy M-6.3: Sidewalk and Bikeway Gaps. Create a connected and complete active transportation network by identifying and eliminating gaps in sidewalks and bikeways, evaluating the adequacy of existing urban trails, and prioritizing sidewalk maintenance.

Policy M-6.4: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities at New Developments. Require new residential and non-residential developments in the city to provide safe and attractive bicycle and pedestrian facilities, such as secure bicycle parking, pedestrian-scale lighting, street furniture, landscaping, and other improvements.

Policy M-6.5: Effects of New Technologies on Active Transportation. Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential effects on designing a transportation network that accommodates all modes and users.

Action M-6a: As part of development review and specific plans, require land development projects to provide connectivity and accessibility to a mix of uses such as schools, parks, work, and shopping destinations that meet residents’ daily needs including secure parking and safety measures.

Action M-6b: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code, as necessary, to consider bicycle and pedestrian access as part of the site plan review for new development projects.

Action M-6c: Dedicate capital improvement funding for citywide projects including pedestrian refuge islands, raised crosswalks, or other relevant crosswalk enhancements as they become available.

Action M-6d: Require that all roadway resurfacing projects and land development projects with impacts to roadways be subject to a review process that considers lane reconfiguration and other opportunities to improve the bicycle and pedestrian network.

Goal M-9: Transportation Management. A community with transportation management strategies that contribute to achieving regional and statewide greenhouse gas emissions targets.

Policy M-9.1: Vehicle Miles Traveled Guidelines. Require vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City shall continue to maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards for the purposes of planning and designing street improvements.

Policy M-9.2: Transportation Demand Management. Require transportation demand management (TDM) strategies as mitigation measures for new projects that exceed the City’s VMT impact thresholds.

Policy M-9.3: Regional Coordination. Encourage regional agencies such as Metro, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote TDM programs that reduce single-occupancy vehicle travel.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *477
Findings

Page 151 of 186 ends

Policy M-9.4: New Development. Work with developers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage public and active modes of travel.

Action M-9a: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code and related implementation documents, as necessary, to reflect TDM best practices.

Action M-9b: Require developments that are approved based on TDM plans to incorporate monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.

Action M-9c: Consider adoption of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) guidelines and thresholds for transportation analysis for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-3.2: Land Use Planning. Reduce concentrated air pollution and the incidence of respiratory illness through the land use planning process by diversifying the land use mix, bringing compatible uses closer together, reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and applying other similar measures.

Policy RM-3.4: Sustainable Technology. Encourage new and emerging technologies that could decrease air pollution.

Goal RM-4: Greenhouse Gas Reduction. Commit to reducing municipal greenhouse gas emissions and achieving a low carbon future.

Policy RM-4.1: Low-carbon Municipality. Demonstrate environmental leadership and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from municipal facilities and operations by at least 49% below 2005 levels by 2035, in conjunction with the City’s 2018 Climate Action Plan (CAP).

Policy RM-4.2: GHG Inventory. Update the community and municipal GHG inventories every five years to track progress toward achieving the City’s GHG reduction goal.

Policy RM-4.3: Development Standards. Require residential and nonresidential development projects to implement sustainable development standards to decrease greenhouse gas emissions.

Policy RM-4.4: Sustainable Infrastructure. Continue to invest in public infrastructure that supports the use of energy efficient or low-emission transportation.

Policy RM-4.5: State and Federal Targets. Review existing City practices to identify methods to decrease overall greenhouse gas emissions.

Policy RM-4.6: City Contractors. Encourage contractors to use low-emission equipment and vehicles for City construction projects.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *478
Findings

Page 152 of 186 ends

Action RM-4a: Implement the local GHG reduction measures identified in the City of Lomita 2018 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and perform on-going monitoring and reporting of GHG reduction impacts.

Action RM-4b: Continue to participate in the South Bay Cities Council of Governments’ (SBCCOG) climate action planning process and update Lomita’s CAP at least every five years.

Action RM-4c: Explore incentives for city contractors who invest in and use low-emission equipment and vehicles for city infrastructure projects or establish minimum requirements in the Municipal Code.

Goal RM-5: Sustainability/Energy Resources. Carefully and safely manage energy resources, embracing sustainable practices for long-term vitality.

Policy RM-5.1: Renewable Energy Production. Promote the development and use of renewable energy sources for city, residential, and business facilities.

Policy RM-5.2: Energy Audits. Promote home energy audits with regional programs such as Energy Upgrade California or other state programs.

Policy RM-5.3: Regional Partnerships. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments and other organizations for outreach events to promote energy awareness and existing programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency.

Policy RM-5.4: Green Building Standards. Ensure that residential and nonresidential development projects comply with the most current version of the California Green Building Standards Code.

Policy RM-5.5: Energy Upgrades. Encourage property owners to participate in solar retrofit and other energy-efficient home improvement projects to reduce reliance on traditional energy sources.

Action RM-5a: As feasible, use renewable energy sources at City facilities.

Action RM-5b: Organize and conduct educational workshops with utility companies informing the public of the benefits of home audits and energy saving practices.

Action RM-5c: Conduct outreach events with the SBCCOG to inform residents and businesses about existing programs and incentives that are offered for energy efficiency.

Action RM-5d: Continue to review development projects to ensure that all new residential and nonresidential development complies with local and state regulations regarding energy efficiency.

Action RM-5e: Consider adopting minimum energy efficiency requirements in the Zoning Code.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *479
Findings

Page 153 of 186 ends

C. TRANSPORTATION

1. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Impacts
Threshold: Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Finding: Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Impact TR-2, pages 4.14-22 through 4.14-28)
Explanation: Future conditions with the Project would result in decreased VMT per employee and increased VMT per capita in comparison to existing conditions. The 2045 Project VMT per capita is approximately two percent higher than existing conditions and the 2045 Project VMT per employee would be three percent lower than existing conditions. Thus, the proposed General Plan Update would exceed 15 percent below the existing Los Angeles countywide average VMT per capita and VMT per employee and therefore would result in a significant Project VMT impact.

The reductions from 2023 Existing Conditions to 2045 Project Conditions indicate that future development, in particular planned mixed-use development, would provide more opportunities for Lomita residents and employees to access jobs and services within shorter distances. The shorter trip distances reduce VMT by vehicles, and also increase the likelihood that trips will be made by non-auto modes such as bicycling and walking.

Improved transit service and accessibility to transit also help to reduce VMT even as travel activity increases.

Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in higher VMT per capita and lower VMT per employee compared to 2023 Existing Conditions. Mitigation of VMT impacts requires reduction of vehicle trips per capita and per employee through increased use of travel modes other than driving alone, and/or shortening of trip lengths through providing a critical mass of complementary land uses near each other. Additional TDM measures (such as funding for supplemental transit services to increase frequency and speed, considering carpooling or vanpooling (ride-matching services), encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules, increasing mix of land uses within the Project or within the Project’s surroundings, and providing pedestrian network and low-stress bicycle network improvements) may be applicable for additional mitigation. The Land Use and Mobility elements developed as part of the General Plan Update includes policies to support the reduction of VMT, including increasing the balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities within the city with the proposed land uses.

Additionally, future development projects under the General Plan update would also be required to complete project-specific VMT analyses based on Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *480
Findings

Page 154 of 186 ends

VMT policies and thresholds established by the City of Lomita, including TDM measures designed to reduce VMT. While such measures are likely to result in less-than-significant VMT impacts when considered at an individual project level, they cannot be guaranteed and are not possible to fully quantify or mitigate at a citywide level as part of this programmatic analysis. Hence, it cannot be demonstrated that additional TDM measures could reduce VMT per capita or per employee by the amounts needed to meet the impact thresholds. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable.

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE GOALS, POLICIES, AND ACTIONS:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy LU-1.1: Land Use Planning. Promote a comprehensive approach to land use planning that is socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable; enhances community livability and public health; offers choices in housing, jobs, amenities, and transportation; reduces pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and the expenditure of nonrenewable resources; and provides opportunities for meaningful public engagement in land use decisions.

Policy LU-1.2: Focused Growth. Focus new higher density mixed-use development along major corridors and within key activity nodes to expand housing opportunity, preserve the character of existing single-family neighborhoods, promote active transportation options, and enhance economic vitality.

Policy LU-1.3: Employment/Housing Balance. Strive to balance levels of employment and housing within the community to provide more opportunities for residents to work locally, reduce commute times, and improve air quality.

Policy LU-3.6: Active Streetscapes. Create safe, inviting, and beautiful streetscapes that facilitate social interaction and improve active transportation along corridors.

Policy LU-5.3: Active Transportation. Promote land use patterns that facilitate active transportation to encourage healthy and active lifestyles, as well as improve overall physical health for residents.

Action LU-5a: Create and maintain an inventory of the city’s pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks, street crossings, lighting, shade trees, and benches, in order to improve pedestrian mobility in all areas of the city.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Goal M-1: Local Circulation System. A community served by a safe and balanced circulation system that meets the needs of all users.

Policy M-1.7: Traffic Calming on Local Streets. Use traffic calming strategies such as signage, speed radar feedback signs, curb extensions, and deflections, as recommended in Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *481
Findings

Page 155 of 186 ends

the City’s Traffic Calming Toolkit, to create a pedestrian-friendly circulation system and promote safety, while not reducing parking supply.

Policy M-1.8: Transportation Demand Management. Encourage the preparation of Transportation Demand Management plans for all major developments or facility expansions to encourage ride-sharing and other improvements, thereby reducing vehicle trips.

Policy M-1.9: New Connections. Explore new connections within the grid system, either non-vehicular or vehicular.

Action M-1e: Monitor the development of new mobility technologies and the potential local effects on vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities and operations, and seek funding to invest in associated infrastructure and technologies such as Traffic System Management (TSM) and traffic signal synchronization.

Action M-1f: Evaluate the applicability of traffic calming tools to minimize cut-through traffic on local streets, especially in residential areas and near schools, and implement improvements as necessary.

Goal M-3: Complete Streets. A community with a well-designed and built transportation network that is safe, accessible, comfortable, and convenient for all transportation modes and users
Policy M-3.1: Complete Streets for Roadway Projects. Apply complete streets principles to all transportation improvement projects (e.g., safety, intelligent transportation systems, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities) to accommodate the needs of street users of all ages and abilities.

Policy M-3.2: Multimodal Connectivity. Link activity centers, employment centers, public facilities, and schools to transit and active transportation facilities.

Policy M-3.3: Streetscape Improvements. Require roadway, sidewalk, and median improvements that enhance the visual character of the roadway system and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety, including street lighting, wayfinding, street trees, and other nonvehicular infrastructure.

Policy M-3.4: Safe Routes to School. Provide infrastructure improvements, enforcement, and incentives to support Safe Routes to School programs and promote walking and bicycling to local schools.

Action M-3a: When planning roadway facilities, incorporate the concept of complete streets, while considering the land use and design context of the surrounding areas.

Action M-3d: Develop strategies and guidelines to set curb use priorities that consider the needs of through traffic, transit stops, bus turnouts, passenger drop-off/pick-up, deliveries, and short-term/long-term parking, especially along major corridors.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *482
Findings

Page 156 of 186 ends

Goal M-5: Transit. A community connected to a comprehensive public transit system.

Policy M-5.1: Improve Local Public Transit Service. Work with Metro, Torrance Transit, and other local public transit providers to plan and improve local transit service and transit facilities, including bus stops, in the city.

Policy M-5.3: Transit Facilities. Require new developments to construct, when appropriate, transit facilities, including bus turn-outs, bus stop infrastructure, and route information signage.

Action M-5a: Explore new intracity transit options such as a Lomita trolley to transport individuals between commercial areas, residential areas, and parks.

Goal M-6: Active Transportation. A community with a comprehensive network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities that encourages active transportation.

Policy M-6.1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to provide active transportation facilities that can serve as an alternative to automobiles, including the Plan’s facility recommendations as shown in Figure M-2.

Policy M-6.2: Local Travel Network. Coordinate with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote local micromobility modes by implementing the Local Travel Network plan and supporting efforts to integrate the network with adjacent cities, as shown in Figure M-3.

Policy M-6.3: Sidewalk and Bikeway Gaps. Create a connected and complete active transportation network by identifying and eliminating gaps in sidewalks and bikeways, evaluating the adequacy of existing urban trails, and prioritizing sidewalk maintenance.

Policy M-6.4: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities at New Developments. Require new residential and non-residential developments in the city to provide safe and attractive bicycle and pedestrian facilities, such as secure bicycle parking, pedestrian-scale lighting, street furniture, landscaping, and other improvements.

Action M-6a: As part of development review and specific plans, require land development projects to provide connectivity and accessibility to a mix of uses such as schools, parks, work, and shopping destinations that meet residents’ daily needs including secure parking and safety measures.

Action M-6b: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code, as necessary, to consider bicycle and pedestrian access as part of the site plan review for new development projects.

Action M-6c: Dedicate capital improvement funding for citywide projects including pedestrian refuge islands, raised crosswalks, or other relevant crosswalk enhancements as they become available.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *483
Findings

Page 157 of 186 ends

Action M-6d: Require that all roadway resurfacing projects and land development projects with impacts to roadways be subject to a review process that considers lane reconfiguration and other opportunities to improve the bicycle and pedestrian network.

Action M-6e: Establish a sidewalk maintenance schedule to improve accessibility and include repair of cracks from tree roots, etc., and clearance of sidewalk space through colocation or undergrounding of utilities and moving signage.

Goal M-9: Transportation Management. A community with transportation management strategies that contribute to achieving regional and statewide greenhouse gas emissions targets
Policy M-9.1: Vehicle Miles Traveled Guidelines. Require vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City shall continue to maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards for the purposes of planning and designing street improvements.

Policy M-9.2: Transportation Demand Management. Require transportation demand management (TDM) strategies as mitigation measures for new projects that exceed the City’s VMT impact thresholds.

Policy M-9.3: Regional Coordination. Encourage regional agencies such as Metro, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and the South Bay Cities Council of Governments to promote TDM programs that reduce single-occupancy vehicle travel.

Policy M-9.4: New Development. Work with developers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimize congestion related to new development through improvements to the circulation system and on-site improvements that encourage public and active modes of travel.

Action M-9a: Review and update the City’s Municipal Code and related implementation documents, as necessary, to reflect TDM best practices.

Action M-9b: Require developments that are approved based on TDM plans to incorporate monitoring and enforcement of TDM targets as part of those plans.

Action M-9c: Consider adoption of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) guidelines and thresholds for transportation analysis for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-1.5: Safe Routes. Provide safe pedestrian and bicycle pathways to parks, recreational facilities, and schools to foster a sense of community well-being and to promote active lifestyles.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *484
Findings

Page 158 of 186 ends

Action RM-1c: Install adequate lighting, designated crosswalks, clear signage, and other nonvehicular infrastructure to improve pedestrian and bicycle connections between residential and open space areas. (Also refer to Mobility Element.) Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *485
Findings

Page 159 of 186 ends

SECTION V

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Regarding the General Plan’s potential to result in cumulative impacts, the City hereby finds as follows:

A. AESTHETICS
Threshold: Would future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable aesthetic and light/glare impacts?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.1.6, pages 4.1- 16 through 4.1-18)
Explanation: The General Plan Update would support additional development beyond existing conditions and could increase residential densities and nonresidential land use intensities in specific areas within the Planning Area.

This new development may result in changes to the skyline throughout the Planning Area, which may obstruct or interfere with views of surrounding visual features. Furthermore, 2045 buildout under the proposed General Plan Update has the potential to result in new and expanded development along highway corridors with high scenic values, even though these corridors are not officially designated as State Scenic Highways. Regional growth has and will continue to result in a cumulative aesthetic effect by converting undeveloped land into developed and occupied areas, and increasing overall levels of nighttime lighting. In general, the General Plan Update Land Use Element proposes an increase in building density and intensity, which could increase the number and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings, as well as supporting infrastructure. This is considered a potentially significant cumulative impact. Subsequent projects implemented under the General Plan Update would be required to be consistent with the General Plan Update policies and actions and adopted regulations pertaining to aesthetics and lighting in Lomita. With implementation of the adopted policies and regulations described above, the proposed General Plan Update would not considerably contribute to permanent changes in visual character, such as obstruction of scenic views, conversion of existing visual character, and increased lighting resulting in a substantial degradation. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Lomita Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on visual character to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, the General Plan Update’s incremental contribution to aesthetic impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *486
Findings

Page 160 of 186 ends

B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to agricultural or forestry resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 7.0, pages 7.0-1 through 7.0-2)
Explanation: The City does not have any zoning classifications for agricultural, forestland, timberland, or timberland production zones, nor does the Planning Area include any agricultural or forestland; therefore, the General Plan Update would not contribute to a significant impact relative to agriculture, forestland, timberland or timberland production zones. It was determined that there was no impact related to these topics. Therefore, impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

C. AIR QUALITY
Threshold: Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to air quality? Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.2.6, pages 4.2-47 through 4.2-49)
Explanation: The City of Lomita continues to coordinate with SCAQMD and SCAG to ensure citywide growth projections, land use planning efforts, and local development patterns are accounted for in the regional planning and air quality planning processes. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to further minimize potential impacts to air quality in support of the AQMP. Therefore, implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan, and impacts would be less than significant. As such, these impacts would not be cumulatively considerable.

Construction of the growth anticipated by the General Plan Update has the potential to temporarily emit criteria air pollutant emissions through the use of heavy-duty construction equipment, and through vehicle trips generated by workers and haul trucks. In addition, fugitive dust emissions would result from demolition and various soil-handling activities. Mobile source emissions, primarily NOx and PM emissions (i.e., PM10 and PM2.5), would result from the use of diesel-powered on- and off-road vehicles and equipment. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day-to-day, depending on the level of activity and the specific type of construction activity. As shown in Table 4.2-6 in Section 4.2 of the Draft EIR, construction-related daily emissions would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for NOx. Additionally, as shown in Table 4.2-7 in Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *487
Findings

Page 161 of 186 ends

Section 4.2 of the Draft EIR, potential operational emissions for the proposed Project would also exceed regulatory thresholds (for VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5). Feasible mitigation measures are incorporated into the policies and actions included within the General Plan Update. However, there are no feasible criteria air pollutant reduction measures beyond those identified within the policies and actions identified, that would reduce impacts. While implementation of these policies and actions would reduce criteria pollutant emissions, the extent to which the impacts would be generated by future development and infrastructure projects have to be determined on a project-by-project basis, as necessary.

Moreover, with respect to local air quality emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and health impacts, future development under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the proposed General Plan Update policies and actions. Implementation of the policies and actions listed above would mitigate and reduce such emissions. However, as there is no way to determine the extent to which these regulations would be, or need to be, implemented, it is impossible to determine if potential impacts would be reduced to below regulatory thresholds because the details and potential emissions levels of future development projects is not known at this time, as there are no specific development projects proposed as part of the General Plan Update. Additionally, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond the policies and actions listed above Therefore, the Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative localized operational impacts, construction and operational health, and TAC impacts would be cumulatively considerable.

With respect to exposure to sensitive receptors, future development under the General Plan Update would be required to comply with AQMP, SIP, CARB, SCAQMD regulations, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and the proposed General Plan Update policies and actions. However, as there is no way to determine the extent to which these regulations would be, or need to be, implemented, it is impossible to determine if potential impacts would be reduced to below regulatory thresholds. There are no feasible mitigation measures except for those listed in above. Based on these impacts, the General Plan Update would contribute to a cumulative impact with regard to air quality in the region and within the air basin (i.e. the South Coast Air Basin) as a whole. Therefore, the Project’s incremental contribution to other emissions would be cumulatively considerable.
ith respect to potential sources that may emit odors during construction and operations, future development projects resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update would be required to comply with the CARB requirements, SCAQMD rules, the City of Lomita’s Municipal Code, and the proposed General Plan Update policies and actions. As a result, the Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *488
Findings

Page 162 of 186 ends

implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to cumulative odor impacts.

Additionally, adherence to SCAQMD rules and regulations would alleviate potential impacts related to cumulative conditions on a project-by-project basis. Project implementation would not contribute to cumulatively considerable objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people within the city.

D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to biological resources? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.3.6, pages 4.3- 15 through 4.3-17)
Explanation: The potential for the Project to have a substantial adverse effect on any special status species, riparian habitat, sensitive natural community, or wetlands is less than significant, as these resources do not generally occur within the Planning Area. Future development projects would be required to adhere to applicable federal, State, and local regulations that provide for sensitive species as part of the discretionary approval process for sitespecific development projects. . Therefore, the proposed Project’s incremental effects related to special status plant or wildlife species, riparian habitats or other sensitive natural community, or any State or federally protected wetlands, would not be cumulatively considerable.

The Planning Area consists primarily of disturbed land that has been developed, paved, or landscaped, and existing vegetation consists of primarily ornamental and/or nonnative plant species. As such, the Planning Area does not provide for habitat linkages. Therefore, the Project would not interfere substantially with the movement of: any native, resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors; or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The General Plan Update would not considerably contribute to interference of wildlife movement nor impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.

Therefore, the Project’s incremental effects involving the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impeding the use of native wildlife nursery sites, would not be cumulatively considerable.

Cumulative development within the region would be required to comply with any agency-specific policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Future development within the city and cumulative development would be assessed for consistency with the agency-specific Municipal Code and General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions. Since the Project would Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *489
Findings

Page 163 of 186 ends

not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, the Project’s incremental effects would not be cumulatively considerable in this regard.

Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to cultural resources? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 5.5.6, pages 5.5- 30 through 5.5-31)
Explanation: Construction of individual development projects allowed under the land use designations of General Plan Update may result in the discovery and removal of cultural resources, including historic and archaeological resources, as well as the inadvertent discovery of human remains. The General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as federal, State, and local regulations, would reduce the risk to resources in the region. Adherence to the General Plan Update policies and actions, and existing federal, State, and local regulations would avoid and/or minimize a cumulative loss of these important resources if they are identified during project-specific surveys or construction activities. Therefore, the General Plan Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative cultural resource impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to cultural resources? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.4.6, pages 4.4- 19 through 4.4-20))
Explanation: As with the Project, the related cumulative projects would undergo environmental review pursuant to CEQA to evaluate potential impacts to cultural resources. This would include studies of historical, archaeological and buried resources that are present or could be present within a specific development site. Additionally, related projects would be subject to compliance with the established State and local regulatory framework, including the General Plan Update policies and actions, concerning the discovery of buried resources or human remains on a project-by-project basis. Where significant or potentially significant impacts are identified, implementation of all feasible site-specific mitigation would be required to avoid or reduce impacts. Compliance with General Plan Update polices and actions and existing regulatory requirements would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on cultural resources to a less than significant level. Based on the above, the Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative historical resource impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *490
Findings

Page 164 of 186 ends

F. ENERGY
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to energy? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.5.6, pages 4.5- 21 through 4.5-22)
Explanation: As future development projects are received and reviewed by the City in subsequent years, those projects would be reviewed for consistency with the General Plan Update and all relevant State-level programs and requirements. All future projects must implement the most current version of the Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, as required by State law.

Consistency with the General Plan Update and other mandatory State-level programs would ensure that future project-level contributions to inefficient, wasteful or unnecessary energy use would be less than significant.

Moreover, buildout of the General Plan Update would not be expected cause an inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources nor conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. As a result, the proposed General Plan Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative energy impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to geologic resources? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.6.6, pages 4.6- 24 through 4.6-28)
Explanation: Seismic, geologic, and soil conditions within the City of Lomita would vary by location and site-specific suitability for development would not be uniform. Geologic and seismic hazards would be reduced to less than significant levels following conformance with the established regulatory framework (i.e., CBC and Municipal Code requirements). If determined necessary, project-specific mitigation would be incorporated to reduce cumulative seismic, geologic, and soil impacts to a less than significant level. If a specific site were determined to create a significant impact that could not be feasibly mitigated, the site would not be appropriate for development. These processes, along with compliance with federal and State laws, local building codes, and public safety standards, would result in less than significant cumulative impacts related to potential seismic, geologic, and soil hazards. As a result, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts involving Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *491
Findings

Page 165 of 186 ends

seismic and geologic hazards
H. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions?
Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.7.6, page 4.7-40)
Explanation: The topic of GHG emissions is inherently a cumulative impact. Though significance thresholds can be developed by air districts, as well as State and federal regulatory agencies, these thresholds and their related goals are ultimately designed to effect change at a global level. As demonstrated in the analysis in Section 4.7 of the Draft EIR, it cannot be guaranteed that the proposed Project would be consistent with the 2045 GHG target for the State of California and would therefore have a significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable impact, even with the implementation of General Plan Update goals, policies and actions.

I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to hazardous materials? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.8.6, pages 4.8- 30 through 4.8-35)
Explanation: Construction of individual development projects allowed under the land use designations of the General Plan Update may involve the transportation, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials, which may involve the use of equipment that contains hazardous materials (e.g., solvents and fuels or diesel-fueled equipment), or the transportation of excavated soil and/or groundwater containing contaminants from areas that are identified as being contaminated. Furthermore, because of the regional nature of the General Plan Update, some future land uses could transport or use hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of a school, or other sensitive receptors such as hospitals and residences. As with specific projects resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update, cumulative development would be required to evaluate individual hazards and hazardous materials impacts at the project-level. While some cumulative impacts would potentially occur in the region as individual projects are constructed, the General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as local, State, and federal regulations would reduce the risk to people associated with hazards and hazardous materials in the region. Considering the protection granted by local, State, and federal agencies and their requirements for the use of Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *492
Findings

Page 166 of 186 ends

hazardous materials and other potential hazards in the region, as described above, the overall cumulative impact for hazards impacts would not be significant. As a result, the General Plan Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative hazards and hazardous materials impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

J. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to hydrologic resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.9.6, pages 4.9- 27 through 4.9-33)
Explanation: The General Plan Update does not propose site-specific development and would not significantly impact drainage courses and hydrologic flows throughout the City. Construction of the individual development projects allowed under the land use designations of the proposed General Plan Update has the potential to result in construction-related water quality impacts and operational-related impacts to groundwater recharge, and cause flooding, erosion, or siltation from the alteration of drainage patterns.

Individual projects would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis to ensure compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as federal, State, and local regulations to reduce hydrology and water quality impacts. Subsequent development projects under the General Plan Update would result in new impervious surfaces and could reduce rainwater infiltration and groundwater recharge; however, the General Plan Update would not appreciably add to the volume of imperious surfaces in the Planning Area. As individual projects are constructed, the General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as federal, State, and local regulations, would substantially reduce potential cumulative impacts. Considering the protection granted by local, State, and federal agencies and their permit and monitoring requirements, as discussed above, and with implementation of the policies and actions included within the General Plan Update, the overall cumulative impact would not be significant. As a result, the General Plan Update's incremental contribution to cumulative hydrology impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

K. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to land use and planning?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.10.6, pages

4.10-15 through 4.10-16)
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *493
Findings

Page 167 of 186 ends

Explanation: Development of cumulative projects in the City of Lomita would be required to mitigate land use impacts on a project-by-project basis. Each project would be evaluated for consistency with the project site’s General Plan land use designation and zoning, adopted General Plan goals, policies, and actions, and other applicable regional land use plans, such as SCAG’s RTP/SCS. As analyzed in Section 4.10 of the Draft EIR, the proposed General Plan Update would result in less than significant impact related to land use and relevant planning. Therefore, the incremental impact of the proposed Project, when considered in combination with development within the City and region, would not result in cumulatively considerable land use impacts.

The land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update provide opportunities for cohesive new growth at infill locations within existing urbanized areas, as well as new growth adjacent to existing urbanized areas within the Planning Area but would not create physical division within existing communities. New development and redevelopment projects would be designed to complement the character of existing neighborhoods and provide connectivity between existing development and new development within the cumulative analysis area. The proposed General Plan Update does not include any new roadways, infrastructure, or other features that would divide existing communities. Moreover, with implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds. Therefore, the proposed General Plan Update's incremental contribution to cumulative land use and population impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

L. MINERAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to mineral resources? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 7.0, page 7.0-2) Explanation: The Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource considered of value to the region or a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan, and no impact would occur in this regard. The Planning Area does not possess any mineral resource recovery sites. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Update would not contribute to a cumulative impact related to mineral resources.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *494
Findings

Page 168 of 186 ends

M. NOISE
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to noise?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable (Draft EIR, Section 4.11.6, pages

4.11-30 through 4.11-32)
Explanation: Draft EIR Table 4.11-11 shows the cumulative noise levels associated with traffic on the local roadway network, including projects within the Planning Area. Cumulative conditions include traffic due to 2045 buildout of the General Plan Update in addition to pass-through traffic from other jurisdictions. By the year 2045, existing land uses adjacent to the studied roadways would be exposed to noise levels that exceed the City's exterior standards of 65 dBA CNEL for sensitive uses. A significant impact would occur if the Project resulted in levels higher than 65 dBA CNEL and increased the overall roadway noise level by three dBA CNEL, which is a noticeable change in noise level. As shown in Draft EIR Table 4.11-12, compared to existing traffic noise levels, 2045 with Project traffic volumes are expected to be up to 1.3 dBA CNEL louder than existing ambient noise levels at existing land uses and would result in inaudible increases in ambient noise. Implementation of the Project would therefore not result in a cumulatively considerable impact relative to traffic noise.

While the Project does not explicitly propose any new noise-generating uses, implementation of the Project could result in the future development of land uses that generate noise levels in excess of applicable city noise standards for non-transportation noise sources. Implementation of land use planning and policies and actions can minimize cumulative noise impacts related to stationary sources by avoiding the placement of noise generating equipment near noise-sensitive land uses and where unavoidable, including design measures to the degree practicable to avoid violating the noise criteria presented in Table PS-1 of the General Plan Update and the Lomita Municipal Code. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions that are intended to reduce noise associated with stationary sources. Applicants of future development projects would be required to demonstrate compliance with the City of Lomita’s Noise Ordinance and the policies and actions in the proposed General Plan Update Noise Element, including Policies N-1.3 through N-1.6, N-2.1 and proposed Actions N-1c, N-1d, N1e and N-2a. Conformance with the existing regulatory framework would reduce cumulative noise impacts from stationary noise sources to a less than significant level. Therefore, the proposed Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts associated with stationary noise would not be cumulatively considerable.

Short-term construction noise and vibration is a localized activity and would affect only land uses that are immediately adjacent to a specific project site.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *495
Findings

Page 169 of 186 ends

Each construction project would have to comply with the local noise ordinance and General Plan Update policies and actions, including Noise Element Policy N-2.4, requiring construction activities to minimize noise and vibration impacts to reduce the disturbance from new development and enforce limits on construction hours as included in the Lomita Municipal Code, and Action M-2c, which directs the City to dedicate code enforcement resources to ensuring all construction activity complies with the limits established in the Lomita Municipal Code. In order to reduce potentially significant impacts related to groundborne vibration associated with construction activities of future site-specific development, project applicants would be required to comply with proposed General Plan Update Noise Element Policy N-2.7 and Action N-2f, which require vibration impact studies when construction utilizes pile drivers or vibratory rollers near existing buildings. Additionally, future development projects would comply with mitigation measures that may be prescribed pursuant to CEQA provisions that require significant impacts to be reduced to the extent feasible. Further, it is unlikely that all construction projects would occur simultaneously within the city. Therefore, the proposed Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts associated with construction noise would not be cumulatively considerable.

N. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to population and housing? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.12.6, pages

4.12-15 through 4.12-16)
Explanation: The land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update provide opportunities for cohesive new growth in key locations in the Planning Area but would not create physical division within existing communities. New development and redevelopment projects would be designed to complement the character of existing neighborhoods and provide connectivity between existing development and new development within the cumulative analysis area. The proposed General Plan Update does not include any new roadways, infrastructure, or other features that would divide existing communities. Moreover, with implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed under the proposed General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds. Lastly, General Plan Update implementation would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Therefore, the proposed General Plan Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *496
Findings

Page 170 of 186 ends

Update's incremental contribution to cumulative land use and population impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

O. PUBLIC SERVICES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to public services, including parks and recreational facilities?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.13.5, pages

4.13-26 through 4.13-30)
Explanation: Development and growth facilitated by the General Plan Update would result in increased demand for public services, including fire protection, law enforcement, schools, parks, libraries, and other public and governmental services. As the demand for public services and recreation increases throughout the 2045 buildout, there will likely be a need to address acceptable service ratios, response times, and other performance standards.

New or expanded service structures (e.g., offices, maintenance and administrative buildings, schools, parks, fire facilities, libraries, etc.) may be needed to provide for adequate staffing, equipment, and appropriate facilities to serve growth within the cumulative analysis area. The General Plan Update includes a range of policies and actions that would ensure that public services are provided in a timely fashion, are adequately funded and staffed, are coordinated between the City and appropriate service agency, and that new development funds its fair share of services. The General Plan Update includes policies to ensure that fire protection and law enforcement services keep pace with new development and that school, library, and governmental services are adequately planned and provided. Payment of applicable impact fees, and ongoing revenues that would come from property taxes, sales taxes, and other revenues generated by the future projects, would ensure that the City maintains acceptable service ratios. The proposed General Plan Update's incremental contribution to cumulative public services and recreation impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Furthermore, Compliance with established local regulations would assure newly constructed or expanded recreational facilities resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update, including cumulative projects, would result in a less than significant physical effect on the environment.

Therefore, the Project’s incremental effects involving increased use of existing parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration would occur or be accelerated, would not be cumulatively considerable.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *497
Findings

Page 171 of 186 ends

P. TRANSPORTATION
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to transportation?
Finding: Considerable Contribution and Significant and Unavoidable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.14.6, pages 4.14-32 through 4.14-35)
Explanation: A significant cumulative impact would occur if the Project and cumulative projects conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Overall, the Project is a programmatic land use plan and does not propose any changes to the circulation system. Any future development within the city would be assessed for consistency with local policies and ordinances, including the Municipal Code and General Plan goals and policies, as appropriate. Therefore, the Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts related to transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities would not be cumulatively considerable.

With respect to VMT impacts, with implementation of the General Plan Update under the City’s cumulative buildout conditions, the 2045 Project VMT per capita is approximately two percent higher than existing conditions and the 2045 Project VMT per employee would be three percent lower than existing conditions. With implementation of the Project, the City’s VMT per capita would exceed 15 percent below the Los Angeles countywide average. Implementation of the Project would, therefore, result in a cumulatively considerable impact relative to VMT. Future development projects under the General Plan Update would also be required to complete VMT analyses based on VMT policies and thresholds established by the City of Lomita, including TDM measures designed to reduce VMT. While such measures are likely to result in less-than-significant VMT impacts when considered at an individual project level, they cannot be guaranteed and are not possible to fully quantify or mitigate at a citywide level as part of this programmatic analysis. Hence, it cannot be demonstrated that additional TDM measures could reduce VMT per capita or per employee by the amounts needed to meet the impact thresholds. Therefore, this impact would remain cumulatively considerable.

The types of uses that would be allowed as part of Project implementation are generally similar to existing and surrounding uses and thereby are compatible with the existing uses in the Planning Area and in the surrounding area. Additionally, the City would review site-specific developments to ensure the provision of adequate ingress and egress and that site distance standards would be implemented. Implementation of the Project would therefore not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact relative to an increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *498
Findings

Page 172 of 186 ends

The Project does not propose changes to the citywide roadway network and configuration that would affect local emergency access. The proposed Project along with the cumulative development projects could result in the temporary closure or control of traffic lanes located immediately adjacent to a development site during construction activities. Any temporary closure would be required to comply with the Lomita Municipal Code. Similarly, the applicant of any proposed development would be required to submit appropriate plans for plan review to ensure compliance with zoning, building, and fire codes prior to the issuance of a building permit. LACoFD would review all development projects for access requirements, minimum driveway widths, fire apparatus access roads, fire lanes, signage, access devices and gates, access walkways, among other requirements to ensure adequate emergency access would be provided to and within the site.

Therefore, the proposed Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts relative to emergency access would not be cumulatively considerable.

Q. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to tribal cultural resources?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.15.6, pages

4.15-9 through 4.15-10)
Explanation: Tribal cultural resource impacts are site specific and generally do not combine to result in cumulative impacts. Construction of the individual development projects allowed under the land use designations of General Plan Update may result in the discovery and removal of tribal cultural resources. The General Plan Update policies and actions, as well as federal, State, and local regulations, would reduce the risk to tribal cultural resources in the region. As discussed above, site-specific development with the potential to impact tribal cultural resources would require a resource assessment and coordination with the tribes to determine the potential for tribal cultural resources and identification of mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the proposed development. Adherence to the General Plan Update policies and actions, and existing federal, State and local regulations would avoid and/or minimize a cumulative loss of tribal cultural resources. Therefore, the General Plan Update’s incremental contribution to cumulative tribal cultural resource impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *499
Findings

Page 173 of 186 ends

R. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update and cumulative development result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to utilities and service systems?
Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 4.16.6, pages

4.16-36 through 4.16-40)
Explanation: Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for water, wastewater, stormwater, solid waste, electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services within the Planning Area.

Water
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would result in increased population growth in the Project Area and a corresponding increase in the demand for additional water supplies.

Similar to future development associated with Project implementation, cumulative development projects would also be required to demonstrate the availability of sufficient water supplies through provisions in SB 610 and/or the CEQA process. Additionally, future development associated with the Project and cumulative projects would be required to comply with existing federal, State, and local regulations, including the Municipal Code, to conserve water and ensure the efficient use of available water supplies.

Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to the provision of utilities and water conservation which cumulative projects would also be required to comply with. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on water supplies to a less than significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to water supplies would not be cumulatively considerable.

Wastewater
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for wastewater services within the sewer service area. the Project enables additional development but does not include specific development proposals. At the time future projects are proposed, they would be required to ensure their own adequate wastewater treatment capacity. Additionally, LACSD charges annual wastewater sewer fees through its Wastewater Treatment Surcharge Program, as well as sewer connection fees through its Connection Fee Program, in order to maintain and expand wastewater services, including wastewater treatment. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to wastewater would not be cumulatively considerable.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *500
Findings

Page 174 of 186 ends

Stormwater
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for stormwater services within the Planning Area. As discussed above, the General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; therefore, the environmental effects of future storm water drainage facilities are unknown at this time. At the time future stormwater facilities are proposed, they would require a separate environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that time would address potential environmental impacts related to the construction and operation of new stormwater facilities.

Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate stormwater service and facilities. Therefore, cumulative impacts to stormwater services and facilities would not be cumulatively considerable.

Solid Waste
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for solid waste collection and disposal services. All future development associated with the Project and cumulative projects would be required to comply with existing solid waste diversion requirements, including the Municipal Code, related to solid waste, thereby further reducing cumulative solid waste in the Planning Area. Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to solid waste, including source reduction. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on solid waste to a less than significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to solid waste would not be cumulatively considerable.

Electric Power, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
Implementation of the General Plan Update along with other cumulative projects would increase demand for electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services within the Planning Area. As noted above, the General Plan Update does not include specific development proposals; individual development projects would be required to verify that electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications usage generated with the new development would not create significant environmental impacts.

Therefore, the contribution of the General Plan Update to cumulative impacts associated with increased electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications would not be cumulatively considerable.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *501
Findings

Page 175 of 186 ends

S. WILDFIRE
Threshold: Would future development associated with the General Plan Update result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to wildfire? Finding: Less than Cumulatively Considerable. (Draft EIR, Section 7.0, pages 7.0-3 through 7.0-4)
Explanation: The Planning Area is not located within a SRA and is not located within a VHFHSZ within a LRA. The site of the Cypress Water Production Facility is within a recommended VHFHSZ. The Planning Area and surrounding area are relatively flat and do not contain any slopes or features that would exacerbate wildfire risks. The Planning Area is urbanized and developed.

Potential residential development would not require the installation or maintenance of infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. The Project would not expose people or structures to significant risk associated with wildfires.

Therefore, as there were no impacts related to wildfire identified in the Draft EIR, there would be no cumulatively considerable impacts.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *502
Findings

Page 176 of 186 ends

SECTION VI

FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL

CHANGES
Sections 15126(c) and 15126.2(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, require that an EIR address any significant irreversible environmental changes that would occur should the project be implemented. Generally, a project would result in significant irreversible environmental changes if any of the following would occur:
• The project would involve a large commitment of non-renewable resources; • The primary and secondary impacts of the project would generally commit future generations to similar uses;
• The project involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential environmental accidents; or
• The proposed consumption of resources is not justified.

Consumption of Nonrenewable Resources
Future development would consume limited, slowly renewable and non-renewable resources. This consumption would occur during each individual project’s construction phase and would continue throughout its operational lifetime. Future development would require a commitment of resources that would include: (1) building materials; (2) fuel and operational materials/resources; and (3) the transportation of goods and persons to and from individual development sites. Construction would require the consumption of resources that are not renewable or which may renew so slowly as to be considered non-renewable. These resources would include the following construction supplies: lumber and other forest products; aggregate materials used in concrete and asphalt; metals; and water. Fossil fuels such as gasoline and oil would also be consumed to power construction vehicles and equipment.

Development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update would consume resources which would be similar to those currently consumed within the City (i.e., energy resources such as electricity and natural gas, petroleum-based fuels required for vehicletrips, fossil fuels, and water). Fossil fuels would represent the primary energy source associated with both construction and ongoing operation, and the existing, finite supplies of these natural resources would be incrementally reduced. Future development operations would occur in accordance with California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6, which sets forth conservation practices that would limit energy consumption. Nonetheless, the proposed Project’s energy requirements would represent a long-term commitment of essentially non-renewable resources.

Construction activities associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could release hazardous materials into the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions; refer to Section 4.8 in the Draft EIR. All potential demolition, grading, and excavation activities would be subject to the established regulatory framework to ensure that Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *503
Findings

Page 177 of 186 ends

hazardous materials are not released into the environment. Compliance with the established regulatory framework and mitigation measures would protect against a significant and irreversible environmental change resulting from the accidental release of hazardous materials. In addition, there is the potential that individual future development projects would use and store limited amounts of potentially hazardous materials typical. All future development activities requiring the routine use, storage, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials would be subject to all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations and standards in place for hazardous materials. Compliance with these regulations and standards would protect against significant and irreversible environmental changes due to the accidental release of hazardous materials.

In conclusion, future construction and operations would result in the irretrievable commitment of limited, slowly renewable, and nonrenewable resources, which would limit the availability of these resource quantities for future generations or for other uses during the life of the individual developments. It is noted that the continued use of such resources would be on a relatively small scale in a regional context.

Irretrievable Commitments/Irreversible Physical Changes Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future. Land use and development consistent with the General Plan Update would result in irretrievable commitments by introducing development onto sites that are presently undeveloped. The conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses would result in an irretrievable loss of agricultural land, wildlife habitat, and open space. Additionally, development would physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emission, noise, traffic, open space, and natural resources. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs.

Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in changes in land use within the Planning Area that would commit future generations to these uses.

In summary, the General Plan Update includes an extensive policy framework that is designed to address land use and environmental issues to the greatest extent feasible, while allowing growth and economic prosperity for the City. However, even with the policies and actions that would serve to reduce potential significant impacts, future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant irreversible changes. This impact is considered a significant and unavoidable impact under CEQA.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *504
Findings

Page 178 of 186 ends

SECTION VII

GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
Section 15126.2(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires a Draft EIR to discuss the ways the Project could foster economic or population growth or the construction of additional housing, directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d), a Project would be considered to have a growth-inducing effect if it would:
• Directly or indirectly foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing in the surrounding environment;
• Remove obstacles to population growth (e.g., construction of an infrastructure expansion to allow for more construction in service areas); • Tax existing community service facilities, requiring the construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental effects; or
• Encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment, either individually or cumulatively.

In addition, CEQA Guidelines state that growth inducement must not be assumed.

The General Plan Update accommodates future growth in Lomita, including new businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and new residential uses. Infrastructure and services would need to accommodate future growth. The General Plan Update is oriented toward the economic growth of the City, with emphasis given to encouraging development of a broader array of businesses, increasing local employment opportunities, and providing residential development as necessary to serve economic growth.

As shown in Table 2-4 of the Draft EIR, buildout of the General Plan Update through 2045 could yield up to 11,159 housing units and 3,110,728 square feet of non-residential building square footage within the Planning Area.

With implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed under the General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds.

Therefore, population and housing growth associated with the General Plan Update would result a less than significant impact.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *505
Findings

Page 179 of 186 ends

SECTION VIII

ALTERNATIVES
A. BACKGROUND
The Draft EIR analyzed two alternatives to the Project as proposed and evaluated these alternatives for their ability to avoid or reduce the Project’s significant environmental effects while also meeting the majority of the Project’s objectives. This section sets forth the potential alternatives to the Project analyzed in the EIR and evaluates them in light of the Project objectives, as required by CEQA.

Where significant impacts are identified, section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires EIRs to consider and discuss alternatives to the proposed actions. Subsection (a) states:
(a) An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision-making and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason.

Subsection 15126.6(b) states the purpose of the alternatives analysis:
(b) Because an EIR must identify ways to mitigate or avoid the significant effects that a project may have on the environment (Public Resources Code Section 21002.1), the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly.

In subsection 15126.6(c), the State CEQA Guidelines describe the selection process for a range of reasonable alternatives:
(c) The range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the Project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be discussed. The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process and briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency’s determination.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *506
Findings

Page 180 of 186 ends

Additional information explaining the choice of alternatives may be included in the administrative record. Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts.

The range of alternatives required is governed by a “rule of reason” that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed Project. Alternatives are limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project.

B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The following objectives have been established for the Project:

1. Preserve, protect, and enhance the city’s existing residential neighborhoods;

2. Celebrate and enhance Downtown Lomita;

3. Expand the range of housing choices to allow more people to live and work in Lomita;

4. Encourage new desirable uses in Lomita and expand the local economy;

5. Promote walkability to everyday uses;

6. Expand the range of high-quality housing options;

7. Create pedestrian-scaled environments;

8. Target housing growth to support commercial activity;

9. Reinforce corridors with memorable places;

10. Create a fiscally-sustainable land use plan with balanced residential and nonresidential development; and

11. Address new requirements of State law.

C. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED FROM DETAILED

ANALYSIS
Section 15126.6(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines specifies that an EIR should (1) identify alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were eliminated from detailed consideration because they were determined to be infeasible during the scoping process; and (2) briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency’s determination. Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *507
Findings

Page 181 of 186 ends

most of the basic project objectives; (ii) infeasibility; and/or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts.

There were no alternatives considered but rejected from detailed analysis in the EIR.

D. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS
The alternatives selected for further detailed review within the EIR focus on alternatives that could potentially reduce the Project’s significant environmental impacts, while still meeting most of the basic Project objectives. Those alternatives include:
• Alternative 1: No Project Alternative (Draft EIR, pages 6-4 through 6-15) • Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative (Draft EIR, pages 6-15 through 6- 25)

1. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative
Description: Under Alternative 1, the City would not adopt the General Plan Update. The existing Lomita General Plan would continue to be in effect and no changes to the General Plan, including the Land Use Map, goals, policies, or actions would occur. This Alternative assumes that ultimate development of the 1998 General Plan, with subsequent amendments including the updated Safety Element (adopted 2021) and Housing Element (adopted 2021), would occur and the 1998 General Plan would continue to provide outdated information regarding several issues, including projections and policy direction identified in the 1990s that are not reflective of the existing socioeconomic data and anticipated development patterns. Subsequent projects, such as amending the Municipal Code (including the zoning map), would not occur. Furthermore, under Alternative 1, the City would not be in compliance with California Department of Housing and Community Development requirements regarding the implementation of the City’s Housing Element and the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).

Alternative 1 would result in the continuation of existing conditions and development levels. New growth would be allowed as envisioned under the existing General Plan, with land uses required to be consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Map.

Alternative 1 (No Project Alternative) would result in significantly less development within the City compared to the proposed Project. Under Alternative 1, the existing General Plan policy framework would still be in effect, which would constitute a status quo approach to land use regulation in the City. The Proposed Land Use Map, along with the policy framework proposed by the General Plan Update, encourages and aims to achieve a community with a balanced land use pattern that meets the City’s long-term housing, employment, and civic needs. The land uses allowed under the General Plan Update would provide opportunities for cohesive new growth at in-fill locations within existing urbanized areas of the City, as well as new growth adjacent to existing urbanized areas and along transportation corridors. A mix and balance of uses to provide an improved ratio of local jobs to population, would ensure that development pays its fair-share of necessary roadway, public service, and other infrastructure improvements, and that increased protection of natural resources would occur. The proposed General Plan Update was Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *508
Findings

Page 182 of 186 ends

prepared in conformance with State laws and regulations associated with the preparation of general plans, including requirements for environmental protection.

Alternative 1 would not include updated policies, particularly those related to housing, greenhouse gases, hazards, complete streets, and environmental justice to address environmental health concerns for disadvantaged communities, as required by State law.

This alternative would not include policies proposed in the General Plan Update to ensure protection of environmental resources, both at a project level and under cumulative conditions, consistent with the objectives of CEQA.

Impacts: As shown in Draft EIR Table 6-4, Alternative 1 would result in the same impacts as the proposed project for the environmental issues of: Agricultural Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Transportation, and Wildfire. Alternative 1 would result in greater impacts as compared to the proposed Project related to Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, Public Services and Recreation, Utilities and Service Systems, and Irreversible Effects, Alternative 1 would result in decreased impacts to Aesthetics, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. This alternative would fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.

Attainment of Project Objectives: This alternative fails to meet almost all of the project objectives, including the following: celebrate and enhance Downtown Lomita; expand the range of housing choices to allow more people to live and work in Lomita; encourage new desirable uses in Lomita and expand the local economy; promote walkability to everyday uses; expand the range of high-quality housing options; create pedestrian-scaled environments; target housing growth to support commercial activity; reinforce corridors with memorable places; create a fiscally-sustainable land use plan with balanced residential and non-residential development; and address new requirements of State law.

Finding: The City Council rejects Alternative 1: No Project Alternative, on the following ground, which provides sufficient justification for rejection of this alternative: (1) the alternative fails to meet almost all of the Project objectives; and (2) the alternative fails to avoid or reduce the Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.

2. Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative
Description: Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative), the City would adopt the updated General Plan policy document, but with less residential and mixed-use growth than reflected in the proposed General Plan Update. This Alternative reflects the following changes from the General Plan Update:

1. Alternative 2 would not include the proposed land use designation of Mixed-Use 70, which permits residential development densities of 20 to 70 units per net acre.

2. Reduction in the amount of residential development anticipated along major corridors including Crenshaw Boulevard, Pacific Coast Highway, Palos Verdes Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *509
Findings

Page 183 of 186 ends

Drive North and Western Avenue; in Alternative 2, the parcels along these corridors would remain designated for non-residential uses, and no action to increase the residential development capacity of the area by redesignating the parcels residential mixed-use would occur.

Alternative 2 would result in approximately 1,674 fewer housing units and 4,419 fewer residents, as well as 377,597 less square feet of non-residential development and 473 fewer jobs within the Planning Area compared to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.

Under Alternative 2, non-residential development potential and anticipated job growth would be less compared to the General Plan Update, due to the reduction in allowed development intensity. This alternative continues to allow for mixed-use opportunities with less residential development potential than allowed under the General Plan Update. This alternative’s purpose is to potentially reduce the severity of potential impacts related to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and total vehicle miles traveled, as overall development of residential uses would be less than what could develop under the Project.

Impacts: As shown in Draft EIR Table 6-4, Alternative 2 would result in the same impacts as the proposed project for the environmental issues of: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire. Alternative 2 result in lesser impacts as compared to the proposed Project related Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Public Services and Recreation, Utilities and Service Systems, and Irreversible Effects. Alternative 2 would result in increased impacts to Transportation, as compared to the proposed Project. This alternative would fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.

Attainment of Project Objectives: Alternative 2 fails to meet several of the basic project objectives, including the following: expand the range of housing choices to allow more people to live and work in Lomita; promote walkability to everyday uses; target housing growth to support commercial activity; and reinforce corridors with memorable places.

Finding: The City Council rejects Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative, on the following ground, which provides sufficient justification for rejection of this alternative:
(1) the alternative fails to meet several of the basic the Project objectives; and (2) the alternative fails to avoid or reduce the Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.

E. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines indicates that an analysis of alternatives to a proposed Project shall identify an environmentally superior alternative among the alternatives evaluated in an EIR. Based on the alternatives analysis contained within the Draft EIR, Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) is identified as the Environmentally Superior Alternative.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *510
Findings

Page 184 of 186 ends

Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) is the environmentally superior alternative as it is the most effective in terms of overall reductions of impacts compared to the proposed General Plan Update and all other alternatives. Alternative 2 meets many of the project objectives. Like the proposed project, Alternative 2 reflects many of the current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders, including the following: preserve, protect, and enhance the city’s existing residential neighborhoods; celebrate and enhance Downtown Lomita; Encourage new desirable uses in Lomita and expand the local economy; encourage new desirable uses in Lomita and expand the local economy; expand the range of highquality housing options; create pedestrian-scaled environments; create a fiscally-sustainable land use plan with balanced residential and non-residential development; and address new requirements of state law. Although Alternative 2 would address new requirements of State law, would fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level. Therefore, City Council rejects the environmentally superior alternative.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *511
Findings

Page 185 of 186 ends

SECTION IX

ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(a), the City Council must balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the Project. If the specific benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, those environmental effects may be considered acceptable.

Having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the Project to the extent feasible through the implementation of the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions; having considered the entire administrative record on the Project; the City Council has weighed the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable adverse impacts after mitigation with regards to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation. While recognizing that the unavoidable adverse impacts are significant under CEQA thresholds, the City Council nonetheless finds that the unavoidable adverse impacts that will result from the Project are acceptable and outweighed by specific social, economic and other benefits of the Project.

In making this determination, the factors and public benefits specified below were considered. Any one of these reasons is sufficient to justify approval of the Project. Thus, even if a court were to conclude that not every reason is supported by substantial evidence, the City Council would be able to stand by its determination that each individual reason is sufficient. The substantial evidence supporting the various benefits can be found in the preceding findings, which are incorporated by reference into this section, and in the documents found in the Records of Proceeding.

The City Council therefore finds that for each of the significant impacts which are subject to a finding under CEQA Section 21081(a)(3), that each of the following social, economic, and environmental benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, outweigh the potential significant unavoidable adverse impacts and render acceptable each and every one of these unavoidable adverse environmental impacts:

1. The General Plan Update promotes more compact, environmentally-sustainable, and equitable development through goals, policies, and actions that balance the need for adequate infrastructure, housing, economic vitality, and environmental justice with the need for resource management, environmental protection, and preservation of quality of life for Lomita residents.

2. The General Plan Update implements principles of sustainable growth by concentrating new urban development around existing urban development, and along key commercial and transportation corridors; thereby minimizing land consumption while maintaining open space, habitat, and recreation uses throughout the Planning Area.

3. The General Plan Update provides a land use map that accounts for existing development, physical constraints, economic development, hazards, and incompatible uses and assigns Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *512
Findings

Page 186 of 186 ends

densities and use types accordingly to enhance the safety, livability, and economic vitality of Lomita.

4. The General Plan Update improves mobility options through the development of a multimodal transportation network that enhances connectivity, supports community development patterns, limits traffic congestion, promotes public and alternative transportation methods, and supports the goals of adopted regional transportation plans.

5. The General Plan Update directs the preservation and environmental stewardship of the vast array of natural, cultural and historic resources that uniquely define the character and ecological importance of the City and greater region.

6. The General Plan Update addresses adverse environmental effects associated with global climate change by facilitating sustainable development, promoting energy efficiency, and promoting development that reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

7. The General Plan Update enhances the local economy and provides opportunities for future jobs and business development commensurate with forecasted growth by planning for commercial and industrial development near existing urbanized areas and transportation corridors.

8. The General Plan Update is the product of a comprehensive public planning effort driven by members of the public, city stakeholders, the Planning Commission and the City Council through a series of public meetings, hearings and workshops that resulted in a thoughtful balance of community, economic, social, and environmental interests.

Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *513
Attachment 5

CITY OF LOMI TA
6 CYCLE TH

HOUSING EL EMEN T

UPDAT E
(2021-2029)
ADOPTED DECEMBER 2021
REVISED OCTOBER 2022
2280 Historic Decatur Road
Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92106
619.591.1370 | dudek.com
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *514

CONTENTS
City of Lomita...........................................................................................................................1 6th Cycle Housing Element Update...........................................................................................1 Housing Element......................................................................................................................3 Introduction .........................................................................................................................3 Housing Element Organization .............................................................................................4 Housing Element Content .................................................................................................4 Appendices .......................................................................................................................4 General Plan Consistency......................................................................................................4 Goals and Policies.................................................................................................................5 Goal 1: A housing stock that is preserved and well-maintained..........................................5 Goal 2: Sufficient housing construction which provides a variety of housing types. ...........5 Goal 3: A City with adequate sites for the development of housing. ...................................6 Goal 4: A community built on equity and inclusion. ...........................................................6 Program Implementation .....................................................................................................7 City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 2
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *515
Housing Element

INTRODUCTION
The City of Lomita (City) is faced with various important housing issues that include a balance between employment and housing opportunities, a match between the supply of and demand for housing, preserving and enhancing affordability for all segments of the population, preserving the quality of the housing stock, and providing new types of housing to support growth and the changing population. This Housing Element provides policies and programs to address these issues.

The Housing Element is a strategic vision and policy guide designed to help address the comprehensive housing needs of the City over an 8-year period (2021–2029 planning period). It defines the City’s housing needs, identifies the barriers or constraints to providing needed housing, and provides policies to address these housing needs and constraints.

The Housing Element of the General Plan addresses the comprehensive housing needs in the City for an 8-year planning period (2021–2029). It provides an analysis of the local housing needs for all income levels, details barriers to providing needed housing, and identifies a set of strategies for meeting the housing need within the planning period. Housing Elements are one of seven required components of a General Plan and are guided by State law, which requires all local governments to update their Housing Elements every 8 years. This is the 6th update to the City Housing Element (6th Cycle).

Recent amendments to housing and planning laws aim to address California’s housing shortage, placing a substantial number of new requirements on the 6th Cycle Housing Element. Housing in California has become some of the most expensive in the nation, ranking 49th out of 50 states in homeownership rates and the supply of housing per capita. Only half of California’s households are able to afford the cost of housing in their local region, and every county and city across the State is required by law to adequately plan for their fair share of needed housing.

The City must adequately plan for its existing and
projected housing needs, including its share of the
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), as identified by the State with input from the Southern California
Association of Governments and local cities and counties.

In order for the private market to adequately address
housing needs, the City must adopt land use plans and
regulatory systems that provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development. The State
requires each local government to demonstrate where
housing can reasonably be expected to be added within
this cycle, and how the City will facilitate and incentivize its production. As identified by the 6th Cycle RHNA, the City must plan for 829 housing units, which are further broken down by income level.

The City’s 6th Cycle RHNA targets
are broken down by income level as
follows:
•
•
•
•
Very-Low Income = 239 units
Low Income = 124 units
Moderate Income = 128 units
Above-Moderate Income =
338 units
• Total = 829
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 3
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *516

HOUSING ELEMENT ORGANIZATION
The Housing Element identifies goals, policies, and programs to comprehensively address the housing needs of all current and anticipated residents at all income levels over the upcoming housing period from 2021 through 2029. The Housing Element is divided into chapters, and supporting documentation is included as appendices of the Housing Element.

Housing Element Content
‒ Introduction provides an overview of the Housing Element, its relationship to State law, the City’s RHNA, and on the Housing Element organization.
‒ General Plan Consistency details those policies identified throughout the elements of the General Plan that guided the policies set forth in the Housing Element to ensure that consistency is maintained throughout the General Plan.
‒
‒
Goals and Policies specifies the City’s plans for meeting the existing and projected comprehensive housing needs of Lomita.

Program Implementation identifies the specific actions that will be implemented to ensure that Lomita’s housing needs are met within the planning period.

Appendices
‒
‒
‒
‒
Appendix A – 5th Cycle Review evaluates the efficacy of the 5th Cycle Housing Element; the progress in implementation; and the appropriateness of the goals, policies, and programs.

Appendix B – Needs Assessment provides detailed information on Lomita’s demographic characteristics and trends that influence supply and demand of various housing types.

Appendix C – Constraints and Zoning Analysis details governmental and non-governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels.

Appendix D – Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Analysis identifies disproportionate housing needs, including segregated living patterns, concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and displacement risk.
‒
‒
Appendix E – Sites Analysis describes the methodology by which the City can accommodate its RHNA targets and how any unmet need will be met, and provides an inventory of the sites identified to meet the housing need.

Appendix F – Outreach Summary details the public outreach conducted for this Housing Element update, and the questions, comments, and issues addressed.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The elements that comprise the City’s General Plan are required by State law to be internally consistent.

Together these elements provide the framework for the development of facilities, services, and land uses necessary to address the needs and desires of the City’s stakeholders. To ensure that these needs are clearly addressed throughout the General Plan, the elements must be interrelated and interdependent.

The City’s General Plan was adopted in 1998, and although the plan is more than 20 years old, its analysis and policies remain relevant. The General Plan identified that Lomita was almost completely developed and that the remaining vacant land was limited to scattered parcels. This observation is especially apparent today, as Lomita has few remaining vacant parcels, and future development will take place through converting lowerdensity or commercial uses to higher densities and mixed uses.

This Housing Element is most directly related to the Land Use Element, since it is the Land Use Element that designates the location and extent of residential development throughout Lomita. This Housing Element is City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 4
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *517
internally consistent with the goals and policies of the other elements of the General Plan. Specifically, the General Plan and the Housing Element are both guided by the following relevant principles:
‒
‒
‒
‒
‒
‒
Promote an orderly pattern of development.

Provide for a variety of housing opportunities.

Provide adequate public services and facilities.

Allow moderate- and high-density land uses in areas capable of supporting such uses.

Promote and support revitalization within Lomita’s commercial districts.

Encourage a balance of land uses to meet the needs of residents.

The goals and policies of the Housing Element are consistent with those set forth in the General Plan, but the Housing Element includes a program to rezone properties to meet the RHNA. If this program creates inconsistencies with those densities identified by the land use designation, such changes will be incorporated into the General Plan Land Use Element to ensure that General Plan consistency is maintained. The City will review the elements of the General Plan upon any subsequent amendment to the other elements of the General Plan to ensure internal consistency is maintained. Adoption of this Housing Element will also trigger revision of the City’s Safety Element since the State has established new requirements to identify information on fire hazards, flood hazards, and climate adaptation and resiliency strategies applicable to the City.

GOALS AND POLICIES
A sound basis for any plan of action is a set of well-defined goals and policies to express the desires and aspirations of the community. The City has established the following housing goals and accompanying policies:

Goal 1: A housing stock that is preserved and well-maintained.

The City will remain committed to those efforts designed to preserve and maintain the existing housing resources in Lomita, including affordable housing, with implementation of the following policies.

Policy 1.1: Protect public health and safety through the repair and maintenance of the existing housing stock.

Policy 1.2: Preserve and rehabilitate housing for lower-income households.

Policy 1.3: Invest in lower-income neighborhoods and in areas with affordable housing while preventing displacement.

Goal 2: Sufficient housing construction that provides a variety of housing types.

The following Housing Element policies underscore the City’s commitment in continuing assistance in the development of new housing for all income groups.

Policy 2.1: Support programs and incentives that expand housing options, especially for lowerincome households and those experiencing homelessness.

Policy 2.2: Support periodic review and modifications to City ordinances, policies, and programs intended to address a variety of housing types.

City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 5
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *518
Policy 2.3: Prioritize infrastructure investments that serve areas with increased densities and where there is existing or planned affordable housing development.

Policy 2.4: Promote and encourage innovation and creativity in housing development through regulations that increase transparency and flexibility in the development approval process.

Policy 2.5: Explore opportunities to offset the cost of infrastructure required of new development through the reduction of regulatory barriers while ensuring that the costs of needed infrastructure does not unduly burden the community.

Policy 2.6: Identify opportunities to conserve energy through the incentivization of energy-saving materials in housing development and facilitation of infill development through opportunities in areas with existing resources.

Goal 3: A City with adequate sites for the development of housing.

The City will remain committed to the identification of prospective development sites for a continued variety and diversity of new housing types at all income levels, as indicated by the following Housing Element policies.

Policy 3.1: Prioritize the identification of sites and zones to accommodate Lomita’s fair share of the existing and future housing needs.

Policy 3.2: Monitor development activity and rezone sites as necessary to ensure no net loss of housing capacity throughout the planning cycle.

Policy 3.3: Engage in planning processes that identify opportunities for increased housing capacity.

Goal 4: A community built on equity and inclusion.

The following policies indicate the City’s continued commitment to affirmatively furthering fair housing and advancement in equity and inclusion through equal housing opportunities within Lomita.

Policy 4.1: Continue to promote equitable and fair housing opportunities for all persons.

Policy 4.2: Oppose prejudices, practices, and market behavior that results in housing discrimination and segregation.

Policy 4.3: Continue collaboration with other public agencies involved in the enforcement of laws aimed at promoting equitable access to housing (fair housing laws) and non-discrimination.

Policy 4.4: Expand opportunities for housing access and homeownership for lower-income households and those with special housing needs.

City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 6
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *519

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRAM 1: HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM
The City’s Community Development Block Grant Rehabilitation Grant Program is restricted to lower-income homeowners (including extremely low-income homeowners) who meet the current U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) income guidelines. The program assists with the rehabilitation of owner-occupied single-family homes and mobile homes. The funds are primarily used for the correction of building safety and health code violations and correction of hazardous structural conditions. Additionally, the City will seek partnership in 2024 with non-profit entities to seek funding and preserve mobile home parks utilizing the Mobile Home Park Rehabilitation and Resident Ownership Program.

Objective/Timeframe(s) Provide rehabilitation assistance to 5 households annually throughout the 2021–2029 planning period and preservation of two mobile home parks.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
General Administration
Community Development Block Grant and Mobile Home Park Rehabilitation and Resident Ownership Program
Relevant Policies 1.1, 1.2, 1.3
PROGRAM 2: CODE ENFORCEMENT
The City implements a code enforcement program that assists property owners in addressing both building code and Zoning Code violations. This program is conducted on a Citywide basis in response to complaints or observation of blighting or unsafe conditions. The most common residential violations addressed include overgrown vegetation, illegal dumping or improper waste container storage, and work without permits.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Track and monitor code enforcement cases as complaints are submitted.

Conduct outreach to property owners with possible violations through direct contact, and inform these households of steps to correction of violations.
‒ Assist 80 households to correct and close violation cases annually.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department/Code Enforcement Division General

1.1, 1.2, 1.3
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 7
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *520
PROGRAM 3: MOBILE HOME PARK REGULATIONS
The City will adopt an ordinance detailing regulations and procedures for any proposed conversion of an existing mobile home park to mitigate the adverse impacts on the housing supply, lower-income households, and on displaced persons. These procedures will require the mobile home park owner to develop a replacement and relocation plan and to adequately mitigate the impact of the closure or conversion upon the displaced residents. The procedures will provide certain rights and benefits to displaced tenants; will require relocation assistance whenever an existing mobile home park or portion thereof is converted to another use; and will require replacement of any lost units, consistent with the requirements of the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Senate Bill [SB] 330, 2019). Further, the City will provide guidance on the analysis of any recreational vehicles and mobile home trailers lost through redevelopment.

Objective/Timeframe(s) Amend Mobile Home Park Regulations to ensure consistency with SB 330, 2019 by fall 2024.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

1.1, 1.3, 4.2
PROGRAM 4: LOWER-INCOME HOUSING PRESERVATION
The City will continue to work with local non-profit agencies and other entities to ensure the continued availability of affordable housing developments in Lomita. The City will work toward maintaining the rent restrictions of at-risk developments by monitoring any changes in ownership, management, and status of deed-restrictions.

The agreement for Lomita Kiwanis Gardens development assistance is set to expire in 2027. This Section 8 property is governed under a Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract between HUD and the landlord. HAP contracts generally last between 5 and 20 years. This property has been identified as a low risk of expiration because the likeliness that the contract with HUD will be renewed is extremely high and this property has been owned and maintained as an affordable housing development by the non-profit Retirement Housing Foundation since 1985. The City will contact and work with the Retirement Housing Foundation to identify and pursue strategies for preserving the affordability for Lomita Kiwanis Gardens. In addition, the City commits to contacting qualified entities on an annual basis until the long-term affordability of Kiwanis Gardens is secured.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
‒
Contact the Retirement Housing Foundation and qualified entities to identify and pursue a strategy for ongoing preservation of affordability for the Lomita Kiwanis Gardens by fall 2024.

Provide information on priority Section 8 assistance through the Los Angeles County Housing Authority, should Section 8 contracts expire or in the event of a change in property ownership.

Where needed, provide funding assistance for the preservation of Lomita Kiwanis Gardens through technical assistance with grant pursuits and letters of support for grants pursued by the Retirement Housing Foundation.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
‒
‒
‒
Community Development Department
General

1.1, 1.2, 1.3
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 8
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *521
The following affordable housing developments are at risk of conversion, with affordability expiring in 2027:

Name Address Lower-Income
Units
Funding
Source
Owner Affordability
Expiration
Lomita Kiwanis
Garden
25109 Ebony Lane 67 HUD Retirement 2027
Housing
Foundation
PROGRAM 5: REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS
The City will mandate replacement requirements consistent with the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 for proposed housing developments on sites that currently have residential uses, or within the past 5 years have had residential uses that have been vacated or demolished, that are or were subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of low or very low income, subject to any other form of rent or price control, or occupied by low- or very low-income households.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Amend staff procedures related to the review and issuance of demolition and development permits by spring 2022.

Enforce replacement requirements in accordance with Government Code Section 66300 throughout and beyond the planning period.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 4.1, 4.2
PROGRAM 6: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
The City will review and amend the Zoning Code to permit accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in all zones that permit residential uses, consistent with State law. Further, the City will develop and adopt a program that incentivizes and promotes the creation of ADUs that can be offered at an affordable rent for very low-, low-, moderate-income households, or those with disabilities.

Further, the City will obtain preapproved plans for ADUs, primarily for the most affordable types, including garage conversions. Additionally, to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing, this program will target outreach for ADU development in higher opportunity census tracts, with a goal of 10 ADUs in higher opportunity areas by mid-cycle.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Adopt an amendment to the City’s Zoning Code, consistent with or less restrictive than State requirements, by spring 2023.
‒ Develop and adopt an affordable ADU incentive program by spring 2023.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 9
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *522
PROGRAM 7: INCENTIVES AND REGULATIONS
The City will evaluate a range of incentive-based and regulatory approaches to facilitate the development of housing for lower-income households. This will include updates to local implementation on the State’s Density Bonus program, as well as evaluation of floor-area-ratio-based bonuses, bonuses in exchange for infrastructure, increased opportunities for expedited permit processing, and increased use of ministerial processing for a variety of housing types.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ To assist in the development of housing for lower income households, including extremely low-income households, the city will annually and proactively reach out to developers of affordable housing to identify development opportunities and assist with development, including funding, supporting funding applications, ministerial reviews of naturally affordable housing types, easing development standards including parking and front setback requirements, fee waivers, reduction or deferrals, and incentives and concessions beyond those in State Density Bonus law. The City will target 200 units in the planning period throughout the City and 30 percent in higher resource or higher income areas and 30 percent in lower-income areas.
‒
‒
Amend the Density Bonus ordinance to ensure consistency with State law, including the provision of a bonus for student affordable housing, senior housing, and 100 percent affordable developments by spring 2023.

Improve development regulations intended to incentivize affordable and mixed-income housing development through regulatory inducements such as incentive zoning paired with objective development standards, or process incentives such as technical assistance in exchange for affordable housing no later than fall 2023.
‒
‒
Annually review regulations to identify opportunities to incentivize and reduce barriers to housing production and ensure ongoing consistency with State laws.

Continue to work with developers through one-on-one consultations, especially affordable housing developers, to identify process improvements to City procedures.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 10
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *523
PROGRAM 8: LOW-BARRIER NAVIGATION CENTERS
Low-Barrier Navigation Centers are housing first, low-barrier, service-enriched shelters focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing. The City will amend the Zoning Code to permit the development of Low-Barrier Navigation Centers as a use byright, without requiring a discretionary action, in mixed-use and non-residential zones that permit residential uses.

Objective/Timeframe(s)
Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Amend the Zoning Code, consistent with State requirements, by spring 2023.

Community Development Department
General
Relevant Policies 2.1, 2.2
PROGRAM 9: SUPPORTIVE HOUSING
The City will amend the Zoning Code to allow supportive housing by-right in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses. Supportive housing shall be permitted in accordance with California Government Code Section 65651.

Objective/Timeframe(s)
Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Amend the Zoning Code, consistent with State requirements, by spring 2023.

Community Development Department
General
Relevant Policies 2.1, 2.2
PROGRAM 10: AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINING
The City provides an affordable housing streamlined approval process in accordance with State requirements for qualifying development proposals and reports on affordable housing streamlining applications in the Housing Element Annual Progress Report. The City will amend its internal procedures to include SB 35 streamlining in staff permitting process procedures.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Continue to provide SB 35 streamlining to qualifying projects throughout the planning period.

Amend the Zoning Code and staff procedures, consistent with State requirements, by spring 2023.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 4.1
PROGRAM 11: OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
The City will increase transparency and certainty in the development process through objective design standards. Objective design standards increase transparency and certainty in the development process by excluding personal and subjective judgement and instead using clear and measurable standards. Any new design standards developed and imposed by the City shall be objective without involvement of personal or subjective judgement by a public official, and shall be uniformly verifiable by reference to the City’s regulations in accordance with the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (SB 330). As a part of the rezoning program, City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 11
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *524
(further detailed in Program 14) and as a part of the ministerial approval for small lot development (further detailed in Program 15), the City will develop objective standards to help facilitate quality design paired with the increase in density. The City will engage the development community through the development of new standards to create standards that facilitate development and maximizes densities. Further, the City will perform site and design testing to ensure that the development and design standards (including maximum permitted heights) do not pose a constraint to achieving the maximum permitted densities for each respective site, including standards for those sites that fall under the MUO rezone.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Ongoing monitoring of Zoning Code amendments to ensure any new design standards are objective.

Pair rezone program (Program 14) with objective standards that ensure that maximum permitted densities can be achieved by fall 2024.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.2, 2.4, 2.5
PROGRAM 12: LOT CONSOLIDATION
The majority of the parcels within Lomita are smaller in size. To facilitate housing development eligible for a density bonus, in accordance with Government Code Section 65915, the City currently offers incentives to reduce the commercial requirement within the City’s Mixed Use Overlay from 30 percent to a minimum of 10 percent in exchange for lot consolidation. Deviations from mixed-use development standards, including the 30 percent commercial requirement, may be considered through the Conditional Use Permit process. Through Program 14 (as detailed below) the City will remove commercial requirements in the MUO to allow standalone residential uses for sites identified.

To further incentivize lot consolidation supportive of housing production, especially for lower-income households, the City will amend the Zoning Code to provide additional lot consolidation incentives to qualifying sites identified in the Sites Inventory Form. The City may establish separate Mixed Use Overlay standards for the Narbonne Avenue and Lomita Boulevards corridors. A West Lomita Boulevard Specific Plan is proposed, which will include incentives to achieve higher residential densities for the consolidation of lots.

For lot consolidation, zoning will be amended to allow up to at least 45 or 65 dwelling units per acre paired with inclusionary housing, lot consolidation, and other community benefits and incentives will be processed through a site plan review and may include a menu of options, such as reductions to required setbacks, an increase in maximum allowed height, a decrease in minimum dwelling unit size, and a reduction in parking requirements.

Objective/Timeframe(s)
Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Amend the Zoning Code to enhance lot consolidation incentives by spring 2023.

Community Development Department
General
Relevant Policies 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6
PROGRAM 13: ZONING REVISIONS FOR SPECIAL HOUSING NEEDS
The City will amend the Zoning Code to permit a variety of housing types consistent with State law. This includes permitting Emergency Shelters as a use by-right, without requiring a discretionary action, in the M-C zone; permitting transitional housing subject to only those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone; calculating Emergency Shelter parking requirements based on the demonstrated need to accommodate staff; permitting employee housing providing accommodations for six or fewer employees by the same process by which single-family residences are permitted in the same City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 12
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *525
zones; permitting large residential care facilities in the Mixed Use Overlay, residential zones, and commercial zones; and defining and reducing development standards for Senior Planned Units Developments.

Further, to clarify the reasonable accommodation process and provide changes that may be necessary for a person with a disability to use and enjoy a dwelling, the City will amend the reasonable accommodation procedures to clarify the difference between a major and a minor accommodation.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Amend zoning and permit procedures to permit group homes in all residential zones with objectivity and approval certainty, including Community Care Facilities (e.g. group homes) with seven or more individuals by fall of 2024. This amendment shall be paired with objective standards as identified in Program 11.

Implement the following Zoning Code amendments by spring 2023:
‒
‒
Amend the Zoning Code to remove discretionary permit requirements for Emergency Shelters in the M-C zone.

Amend the Zoning Code to consider transitional as a residential use of property and to permit transitional housing in the same manner as other residential uses in the same zone.
‒
‒
‒
‒
Permit employee and farmworker housing in accordance with the Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6 and the Employee Housing Act.

Amend the Zoning Code to provide a process by which large residential care facilities with seven or more residents may be permitted, without discretion, in commercial and mixed-use zones.

Reduce development standards for Senior Planned Unit Developments through the adoption of a reduction in parking requirements and a reduction in minimum unit size requirements.

Amend Reasonable Accommodation procedures to remove the major Reasonable Accommodation Process and analyze the Planning Commission hearing requirement as a constraint.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 4.1
PROGRAM 14: REZONE PROGRAM
To facilitate the development of multifamily housing affordable to lower-income households, especially in areas with access to resources and opportunity, the City will rezone to accommodate the shortfall for the lower-income RHNA; rezone to accommodate the remaining moderate- and above-moderate income RHNA need; and rezone to create a buffer of capacity for the lower- and moderate-income RHNA as described below.

Shortfall Rezone
The City will increase the allowable density within the existing Mixed Use Overlay to permit up to 30 dwelling units per acre with a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, allowing exclusively residential uses and requiring that at least 50 percent of the building floor area be dedicated to residential uses. This rezone will occur no later than October 15, 2024. Rezoned sites that are adequate for accommodating the lowerincome RHNA will permit owner-occupied and rental multifamily uses by right pursuant to Government Code City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 13
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *526
Section 65583.2(i) for developments in which 20 percent or more of the units are affordable to lower-income households. These will be selected from site groups A through Y, as identified in Table B of the Sites Inventory Form; will be suitable; will have the capacity for at least 16 units; and will be available for development in the planning period where water and sewer can be provided.

Remaining Moderate and Above Moderate Need Rezone
As described above, the City will rezone to increase the allowable density within the existing Mixed Use Overlay to permit up to 30 dwelling units per acre. Non-vacant sites used in the 5th Cycle Housing Element and vacant sites used in the 4th and 5th Cycle Housing Elements will permit owner-occupied and rental multifamily uses by right pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(i) for developments in which 20 percent of more of the units are affordable to lower-income households; these will be selected from the sites identified in Table B of the Sites Inventory Form.

Buffer Rezone
To further expand housing opportunities for within-resourced areas, the City will extend the Mixed Use Overlay to additional sites not already designated as mixed use. This extension will provide a buffer of housing capacity to ensure that adequate capacity remains to accommodate the RHNA throughout the planning period. Further, the City will reevaluate consistency with the General Plan and amend the General Plan, as necessary, concurrent with the rezone to ensure continued consistency.

Development Standards
As described in Program 11, Objective Design Standards, the City will pair the rezone with new objective development and design standards to allow multifamily development to be permitted without discretion (byright). Through the rezone and the development of the paired standards, the City will perform site and design testing to ensure that the development and design standards (including maximum permitted heights) do not pose a constraint to achieving the maximum permitted densities for each respective site, including standards for those sites that fall under the MUO rezone, the City will also ensure that covered parking is not required in the updated standards for the MUO.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
The rezone will occur no later than October 15, 2024.

Evaluate for General Plan consistency and amend General Plan as necessary, concurrent with the rezone.
‒ Rezone sites selected from Sites A–Y as identified in Table B of the Sites Inventory Form.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.6, 3.1, 3.3
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 14
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *527
PROGRAM 15: INCREASING HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES IN LOW DENSITY DISTRICTS To increase opportunities for homeownership, the City will identify objective design standards and create a ministerial process by which a single-family or agriculture zoned lot can be subdivided to accommodate additional single-family units. This will maintain the City’s existing single-family character while creating new options for those entering the housing market and increasing opportunities for fee-simple type of ownership. (SB 9, 2022). The City will target 50 units in the planning period, 40 percent of which will be targeted in higher resource and higher income areas.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Implement the provisions of SB 9 by January 1, 2022 and consider ordinance amendment to establish ministerial review procedures and objective development and design standards for any proposed housing development, or proposed lost splits of existing single-family residential lots, in the R-1 and A-1 zones (as they exist on January 1, 2022) by spring 2023.
‒ Determine the need for an ordinance amendment to establish ministerial review procedures and objective development and design standards for proposed housing development, or proposed lot splits of existing single-family lots, in the R-1 and A-1 zones, which are not subject to SB 9 by Spring 2023.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 3.3
PROGRAM 16: NO NET LOSS
The City will monitor development activity, proposed rezones, and identified capacity to ensure adequate remaining capacity is available to meet any remaining unmet share of the RHNA for all income levels throughout the entirety of the planning cycle, consistent with no-net-loss requirements.

If, at any time during the planning period, a development project results in fewer units by income category than identified in the Sites Analysis (Appendix E) for that parcel and the City cannot find that the remaining sites in the Housing Element are adequate to accommodate the remaining RHNA by income level, the City will, within 180 days, identify and make available additional adequate sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Amend staff procedures to ensure all development proposals and rezone proposals are reviewed against the capacity identified for sites in the Sites Inventory Form within 3 months of Housing Element adoption. ‒ Develop a methodology for tracking remaining capacity within 1 year of Housing Element adoption.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

3.2, 3.3
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 15
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *528
PROGRAM 17: ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS
The City will continue to report annually on the City’s progress toward its 8-year RHNA production targets and toward the implementation of the programs identified in the Housing Element to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

As part of the annual progress report in 2025, the City will conduct an in-depth evaluation of the effectiveness of identified sites to accommodate the RHNA and programs to affirmatively further fair housing and promote lot consolidation. Based on the outcomes of this evaluation, the City will make adjustments to policies and programs as appropriate within 6 to 8 months.

Objective/Timeline(s) ‒
‒
Submit approved Annual Progress Reports to HCD annually by April 1.

Mid-Term evaluation in 2025.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.2, 3.2
PROGRAM 18: SURPLUS LANDS
The City will identify and prioritize State and local surplus lands available for housing development affordable to lower-income households and report on these lands in accordance with the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 1486 (2019). The City will report on surplus lands annually through the Housing Element Annual Progress Reports.

Further, the Housing Authority owns one site in Lomita located at 25007 Walnut Street. This site has been identified by the Housing Authority as an opportunity site for additional affordable housing in the City.

The Housing Authority has authorized the City Manager to explore options for preparation of a Request for Proposals (RFP). Working with the Housing Authority, the City will issue a RFP for development of this property.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Identify and track surplus City-owned sites annually.

If surplus sites are identified and available for the purpose of developing low- and moderate-income housing, prior to the disposal of surplus lands, the City shall provide a written notice of availability to any local public entity and housing sponsors that have notified the Department of Housing and Community Development of their interest in surplus land. ‒ Release RFP for affordable housing development at Housing Authority owned site by December 2023.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department and Housing Authority
General

2.2, 2.6, 3.3
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 16
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *529
PROGRAM 19: ACCESSIBILITY
The City will ensure all new, multifamily construction meets the accessibility requirements of the Federal and State Fair Housing Acts through local permitting and approval processes. Further, the City will promote increased accessibility by connecting developers and residents to resources on design features that are accessible and safe to all people regardless of age, size, ability, or disability.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Continue to enforce accessibility requirements through development approvals throughout the planning cycle.

Create a housing resources webpage that connects developers and residents to accessibility resources, such as home retrofit guides and universal design standards that can increase in-unit accessibility, among other housing-related information and resources, by summer 2023. The City will target marketing in areas of higher need with a goal of 50 persons assisted in the planning period.
‒ Residents and property owners will be notified of updates to the City’s website through the City’s monthly e-newsletters that are sent to the City’s listserv.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

1.1, 4.1, 4.4
PROGRAM 20: HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
The Los Angeles County Development Authority administers homebuyer assistance programs for Lomita. The City will continue to connect residents to available resources and to information regarding homeownership assistance through digital media platforms. The following programs apply:

The Home Ownership Program (HOP) provides loans for down payment and closing costs. The HOP loans are shared equity loans (at zero interest) with no monthly payments until the home is sold, transferred, or refinanced. The home must be owner-occupied for the life of the loan, which is 20 years. Eligible properties are single-family homes or attached/detached condominium units or townhomes within the purchase price limits established by HUD. The borrower must contribute a minimum of 1 percent of the down payment. Also, the borrower must complete an 8-hour education course in homeownership by a HUD-approved counseling agency.

The Mortgage Credit Certificate Program offers the first-time homebuyer a Federal income tax credit by reducing the amount of Federal taxes to be paid. It also helps a first-time homebuyer qualify for a loan by allowing a lender to reduce the housing expense ratio by the amount of tax savings. The credit is subtracted dollar-for-dollar from the borrower’s Federal income taxes. The qualified buyer is awarded a tax credit of up to 15 percent, with the remaining 85 percent taken as a deduction from the income in the usual manner.

The Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA) is a joint powers authority between Los Angeles and Orange Counties formed in June 1988 to create first-time homebuyer programs for low- to moderate-income households. SCHFA does not lend money directly to the homebuyers; the homebuyers must work directly with a participating lender. The program provides down payment and closing cost assistance in the form of a gif equal to 4 percent of the first loan amount.

City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 17
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *530
Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Include updated information in City newsletters annually.

Update the City’s website with relevant information and resources by fall 2023 and ensure that all web materials use best practices for user accessibility through information that is perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 4.1, 4.4
PROGRAM 21: SECTION 8 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER PROGRAM
The Los Angeles County Development Authority administers the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program to increase housing access to lower-income renter households. The City does not administer the Section 8 program, but the City can work to help raise awareness to property owners about obligations to accept tenants without regard of their source of income and to inform residents of the availability of the program.

The City will continue to connect residents and property owners to information regarding Section 8 rental assistance through an informative housing-related webpage with resources and updates in the City’s monthly e-newsletters and bi-annual newsletters. The City will make resources available on its website and work with local rental property owners to expand program participation. In addition, to pursue place based strategies for increasing housing opportunity, the City will conduct an analysis no less than once every two years, and target Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers in higher opportunity areas throughout the City.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Provide 70 Section 8 vouchers annually and target 50% of housing choice vouchers in higher opportunity and higher income areas.

Update the City’s website to create a housing resources page that connects residents, developers, non-profits, property owners, and other interested parties to relevant information and resources on available housing programs, regulations, events, and other relevant information no later than summer 2023.
‒
‒
‒
Include updated information to connect property owners and residents to the City’s housing resources webpage in City newsletters, which are sent to all property owners in the City’s boundaries bi-annually.

Include updated information to connect property owners and residents to the City’s housing resources webpage in the monthly e-newsletters that are sent to the City’s listserv.

To Affirmatively Further Fair Housing, beginning in 2023, the City will conduct an analysis every two-years to target Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers in higher opportunity areas throughout the City.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 4.1, 4.4
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 18
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *531
PROGRAM 22: FAIR HOUSING
The City, in cooperation with the Housing Rights Center (HRC), promotes equal housing opportunities.

Through the City’s participation in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant program, HRC provides the following services:
‒
‒
Housing discrimination complaints and investigations – Investigates allegations of housing discrimination.

Fair housing education and outreach – Distributes educational literature and resources (available in multiple languages) and presents free fair housing law workshops for landlords, tenants, nonprofit organizations, and government employees.
‒ Tenant and landlord counseling – Provides free telephone and in-person counseling to both tenants and landlords.

The City will continue to further fair housing by continuing to refer complaints and inquiries to HRC, the distribution of fair housing resources, and increased coordination with HRC to gather and analyze data collected through the Fair Housing Program.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Include updated information in the City’s monthly newsletters.

Update the City’s website with relevant information and resources on fair housing from HRC within 1 year of Housing Element adoption; distribute information in the City’s monthly newsletter.
‒
‒
Provide annual staff trainings on how to refer complaints and inquiries to HRC with a goal of 200 households assisted throughout the City within the planning period.

Coordinate with HRC to gather and analyze local data collected annually and make adjustments as appropriate.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4
PROGRAM 23: FAIR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT MARKETING
The City will promote compliance with housing discrimination laws to ensure that all print and advertisement materials for the sale and rental of housing is compliant with Government Code 12955, which prohibits such materials from indicating a preference or limitation based on a protected classification. The City will connect developers to resources and requirements to raise awareness about fair housing in housing marketing materials.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Develop and promote marketing material standards, consistent with the standards outlined in State law, to ensure representative materials are provided by developers by summer 2024.
‒ Ensure standards are easily available for development applicants at the permit counter and on the City’s website by summer 2024.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

4.1, 4.2, 4.4
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 19
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *532
PROGRAM 24: ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE The City continues to participate in an ongoing regional collaborative effort to analyze and reduce impediments to fair housing choice. The analysis is part of a joint effort to prepare, conduct, and submit its certification for affirmatively furthering fair housing. The City will continue to collaborate with the Community Development Commission and the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles to continue this analysis.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Continue to participate in the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice every 5 years.

Collaborate with the Community Development Commission and the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles through continued communication and data-sharing for the completion of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice every 5 years.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4
PROGRAM 25: ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM
The City will periodically review the City’s Zoning Code and subdivision requirements, as well as other applicable codes, to promote energy conservation in housing rehabilitation and in the construction of new housing. Further, the City offers a waiver of administration planning fees and a portion of the Building and Safety fee for solar projects. This program will supplement existing City efforts in the enforcement of the State’s Green Building Standards. The City will target assisting 200 households throughout Lomita, including 40 percent in lower income areas, during the planning period.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Periodically review zoning and subdivision requirements to promote energy conservation measures, concurrent with updates to the Building Code or by 2026, whichever is sooner.
‒
‒
Promote energy conservation strategies on the City’s website by summer 2023 and in the City’s summer iteration of the bi-annual newsletter.

Continue to provide fee waivers that are available for solar projects throughout the planning period.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.2, 2.6
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 20
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *533
PROGRAM 26: INCREASED TRANSPARENCY
The City will maintain information on the City’s website that is applicable for housing development project proposal requirements, including a current schedule of fees, exactions, applicable affordability requirements, all zoning ordinances, development standards, and annual fee reports or other relevant financial reports.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Ensure all relevant information is provided on the City’s website within 1 year of Housing Element adoption.

Continue to update information as changes to the City’s regulations are made and as new information becomes available throughout the planning period.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.4 PROGRAM 27: REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Large parking lots associated with religious institutions provide opportunities for partnerships that facilitate the development of housing for vulnerable populations. The City will ensure that appropriate parking reductions apply to any development proposals that would eliminate religious-use parking spaces in exchanged for housing developments, in accordance with State law. Further, the City will explore additional opportunities to reduce parking requirements for residential uses in areas that are walking distance from resources and amenities. This will include a reduction to covered parking requirements and overall parking requirements for multifamily housing and will ensure that covered parking requirements are not applicable in the MUO. Further, as described in Program 13, the City will ensure consistency with AB 139 (2019) by calculating Emergency Shelter parking requirements based on the demonstrated need to accommodate staff working in the emergency shelter, provided that the standards do not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Amend the Zoning Code to identify a process by which parking requirements can be reduced for religious institutions in exchange for housing development, consistent with the requirements of AB 1851 (2020) by spring 2023.
‒ Amend the zoning code to adhere to the requirements of AB 139 (2019) regarding parking for emergency shelters. This includes sufficient parking to accommodate all staff working in the emergency shelter, provided that the standards do not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone. ‒ Implement parking reductions for multifamily housing and remove garage parking requirements across all residential zones by spring 2024.

This will include the removal of garage parking requirements across all residential zones, a reduction to covered parking requirements and overall parking requirements for multifamily housing, and will ensure that covered parking requirements are not applicable in the MUO.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 21
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *534
PROGRAM 28: REZONE OPPORTUNITIES
To maintain adequate capacity and to increase opportunities for development, the City will continue to identify areas appropriate for increased residential densities, specifically in areas with access to resources, amenities, and public transit. The City will continue to work with developers and the broader community and explore opportunities to rezone areas ideal for increased housing capacity through specific plans, an update to the General Plan, or a focused plan amendment. The City will also coordinate with developers to identify areas ideal for implementation of density minimums, especially for sites identified to be rezoned. The City will target 200 units during the planning period, with 30 percent of the target in higher resource or higher income areas and 30 percent in lower income areas.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒ Coordinate with the Housing Authority of Los Angeles to identify opportunities for increased densities and future redevelopment within the planning period.
‒ Continue to evaluate opportunities for updated land use plans and zoning ordinances that can increase densities through annual informational sessions with the Planning Commission.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4
PROGRAM 29: ONGOING CODE UPDATES
The City will continue to update its regulations, as necessary, in response to legislative changes. Further, the City will monitor opportunities and amend its Zoning Code to streamline, update, and simplify regulations related to housing, where possible.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Annually monitor State legislative changes and amend regulations accordingly.

Continue to accept recommendations from the development community for ideas on how the City can increase flexibility and certainty in the development process. This will be achieved through continued project coordination meetings with developers through the submittal process.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 22
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *535
PROGRAM 30: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE
To facilitate the production of lower-income housing and to ensure the City’s program to rezone properties for increased densities maximizes the public benefit received, the City will consider an inclusionary ordinance to pair with the rezoning of sites. The City will conduct an economic feasibility analysis for consideration of an inclusionary housing ordinance. Based on the findings of the analysis, where an inclusionary requirement and in-lieu fee would not impede the development of housing, the City will consider the adoption of an inclusionary housing ordinance.

Objective/Timeframe(s) ‒
‒
Conduct an inclusionary housing feasibility analysis by spring 2024.

Adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance, where feasible, by winter 2025.

Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
Community Development Department
General

2.1, 2.2, 4.4
PROGRAM 31: PLACE-BASED STRATEGIES FOR COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION The City will continue to prioritize the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the City’s annual budget, CDBG funds, and biannually seek additional funding to pursue place-based strategies in areas of higher need or lower income and ensure equitable distribution of funds. Further, the City will focus neighborhood improvement projects, such as streetscape enhancements, complete street improvements, safe routes to school programs, and other similar community benefit projects, in lower income areas to support new construction of housing, enhancing access to upward mobility and connectivity to higher income and opportunity areas.

Complete a minimum of one improvement project annually in lower income Objective/Timeframe(s) areas.

Community Development Department Responsible Agency
Funding Sources
Relevant Policies
General

2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 3.3
City of Lomita 6th Housing Element Update | 23
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *536
City of Lomita
6 th Cycle Housing Element Update
Appendices
Appendix A: Review of 5th Cycle Housing Element Accomplishments Appendix B: Needs Assessment
Appendix C: Constraints and Zoning Analysis
Appendix D: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Appendix E: Sites Analysis and
Sites Inventory Form
Appendix F: Community Engagement Summary
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *537
Appendix A:

Review of 5th Housing
Element Accomplishments
(2013–2021)
Contents
Appendix A: Review of 5th Housing Element Accomplishments (2013–2021).............................1 For the 5th Cycle Housing Element planning period, the City of Lomita (City) committed to specific actions to address Citywide housing needs and to help achieve housing goals. The programs are aimed to assist in achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the General Plan Housing Element. Throughout the planning period, the City continued to provide all the programs outlined in the Housing Element.

Many of the Housing Element programs are administered by regional agencies, such as the Los Angeles County Development Authority, and the City continues to participate in these regional efforts. Regional programs tend to have more funding, and while their success is not often reflected at the local level, the City’s residents benefit from these programs. The progress made toward locally administered programs has continued, and many have proven to be successful, most notably the Second Unit Program, or Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Program. All of the programs identified in the 5th Cycle Housing Element will continue in some form in the 6th Cycle, although some are revised to address the current local housing need. Below is an overview of the progress made toward each program over the 8-year planning period, as well as the current program status.

Page | 1 Appendix A
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *538
Program in Housing Element

1. Housing Rehabilitation
Grant Program
Progress Summary Program Status
Progress: During the 5th Cycle Housing Element planning Ongoing period, 81 low-income owner-occupied units were rehabilitated under this program.

Effectiveness: This program set out to provide assistance to 20 households annually. The number of households assisted
averaged approximately 13 per year.

Appropriateness: Revise and continue with attainable objective.

Progress: Phone, email, and online reporting are all available.

The City began using case management software in 2016 to better track code enforcement cases. From October 2016 to the end of 2020, the City had 509 total cases. The most common residential violations addressed are overgrown vegetation, illegal dumping or improper waste container storage, and work without permits.

2. Code Enforcement Ongoing
Effectiveness: The program objective was to monitor housing conditions and code violations to work with property owners to correct and provide information on rehabilitation assistance to eligible households. The City improved processes to better implement this program.

Appropriateness: Continue.

3. Mobile Home Park
Conservation Program
Progress: The City offers technical assistance services to mobile home park residents who wish to incorporate and purchase their mobile home park. However, there were no such inquiries during the 5th Cycle period. Further, the City monitors the condition of mobile home parks.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: There were no inquiries regarding the
incorporation or purchase of mobile home parks within the 5th Cycle. Further, staff reached out to the California Department of Housing and Community Development to inquire about mobile home inspection results, and results for the Palms Trailer Park revealed that it meets standards.

Appropriateness: Revise as a program to protect tenants who are affected by redevelopment.

4. Low Income Housing
Preservation
Progress: Kiwanis Gardens, a publicly assisted housing
development with a total of 67 units, was identified as being at risk of conversion to market-rate housing. The life of the affordability covenant was successfully extended through 2027.

Effectiveness: This program was successful in preserving an expiring covenant of affordability for the Kiwanis Gardens development. Kiwanis Gardens is under a project-based contract and is administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The property is owned by the
Retirement Housing Foundation and is considered to be a low risk for future conversion.

Ongoing
Appropriateness: Continue.

5. Second Units/Granny
Flats Program
Progress: The City approved 35 accessory dwelling units/second units from 2014–2019.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: This program aimed to achieve an average of 3 dwelling units a year, or 24 total units. The City exceeded its objective.

Page | 2 Appendix A
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *539
Program in Housing Element Progress Summary Program Status Appropriateness: Revise and continue to ensure consistency with State law.

6. Zoning and Other
Incentives
Progress: The City offers a density bonus to qualifying developments in accordance with State Density Bonus Law.

However, the City did not receive any development applications for the use of a density bonus within the 5th Cycle. Through the discretionary review process, the City regularly relaxes the commercial square footage requirement for mixed-use
developments to allow for a larger proportion of residential uses and to make projects more viable.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: The objective of this program is to create a marketing brochure to advertise and promote available
incentives for interested developers, but the materials were not created. However, the Planning Commission approved the
reduction of commercial requirements for mixed-use
development for a hand full of proposals within the 5th Cycle.

Appropriateness: Review and revise.

7. Lot Consolidation Progress: The lot consolidation program assists in the facilitation Ongoing of development within the Mixed-Use Overlay. Further, through the review of mixed-use development within the Mixed-Use Overlay, the Planning Commission demonstrates flexibility in the required minimum commercial square footage. One
development proposal approved in 2020 was only required to provide 10 percent of the total square footage as commercial, compared to 30 percent as detailed in the development
regulations of the Zoning Code.

Effectiveness: The program set out to prepare a marketing brochure, visit property owners annually to discuss
redevelopment potential, and provide priority ministerial processing for lot consolidation.

Appropriateness: Revise and continue. This program can instead apply to all development on sites identified in the sites inventory.

8. Zoning Revisions for
Special Needs Housing
Progress: Zoning revisions for special needs housing includes implementation of 2013 amendments to the Zoning Code to address emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, and single-room occupancy units. Although the zoning amendments were adopted, no such developments were
produced during the 5th Cycle.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: This program did not result in the development of special needs housing. Recent amendments to State law will require further updates to the City’s Zoning Code.

Appropriateness: Revise and continue. This will be a program to update the Zoning Code consistent with State law.

9. First-Time Homebuyers Progress: The First-Time Homebuyers Program is administered Ongoing Programs by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA).

During fiscal years 2017–2021, LACDA reported a total of 130 loans at an amount of approximately $87 million to assist firsttime homebuyers with purchasing homes.

Effectiveness: The objective of this program was to connect residents to the County of Los Angeles website and available resources. Countywide, the program assisted many homebuyers.

Page | 3 Appendix A
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *540
Program in Housing Element Progress Summary Program Status The City provides a City contact on its website for questions related to HUD and Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) programs.

Appropriateness: Continue.

10. Mortgage Credit
Certificate Program
Progress: LACDA offers the Mortgage Credit Certificate
Program as an income tax credit to first-time homebuyers. In fiscal years 2016–2020, LACDA issued approximately $88.9 million in these credits.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: The objective of this program was to connect residents to the County of Los Angeles website and available resources. Countywide, the program assisted many homebuyers.

The City provides a City contact on its website for questions related to HUD and CDBG programs.

Appropriateness: Continue.

11. Southern California
Home Financing
Authority
Progress: LACDA originated 361 home ownership loans during 2014–2020 for the Southern California Home Financing
Authority across the region.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: The objective of this program was to connect residents to the County of Los Angeles website and available resources. Countywide, the program assisted many homebuyers.

The City provides a City contact on its website for questions related to HUD and CDBG programs.

Appropriateness: Continue.

12. Section 8 Housing
Choice Voucher
Program
Progress: Within the LACDA region, as of 2020, 23,326 units are under contract and 25,114 units are authorized. This has increased since 2014 when there were 22,861 units under contract and 23,232 units authorized.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: The objective of this program was to connect residents to the County of Los Angeles program and to promote the program to rental property owners. The City provides a City contact on its website for questions related to HUD and CDBG programs.

Appropriateness: Continue.

13. Fair Housing Program Progress: While the City continues to refer complaints and inquiries to the Housing Rights Center and distributes fair housing service handouts, the City does not keep any quantifiable record of complaints.

Ongoing
Effectiveness: There is not data to determine the effectiveness of the program, but that does not mean that the program was ineffective.

Appropriateness: Review and revise. Need to develop a
quantifiable way of tracking progress. Can either develop staff training and track the number of trainings or staff trained, or develop a process for tracking the number of complaints or handouts.

14. Energy Conservation
Program
Progress: The City's Newsletter goes out on a quarterly basis to every address within the City’s boundaries. This includes every Lomita resident. The newsletter regularly includes information on energy and water conservation, rebates offered, and other information. Further, in 2013, the City amended the Zoning Code to ensure that gas station signs use LED lights.

Ongoing
Page | 4 Appendix A
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *541
Program in Housing Element Progress Summary Program Status Effectiveness: The objectives of this program are to review regulations to promote energy conservation measures and distribute materials of resource conservation. The City amended the Zoning Code related to this program in 2013 and continued to provide resources to residents on a quarterly basis throughout the planning cycle.

Appropriateness: Continue.

The City’s programs developed to directly address special needs housing were successful in meeting identified objectives, but did not directly result in the development of new housing for those with special needs. Program 8 of the 5th Cycle Housing Element addressed specified zoning revisions that were needed for the provision of housing for those with special needs. This included Zoning Code revisions to permit emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, and single-room-occupancy units, which were all implemented during the 5th Cycle.

Although there are few programs that directly support the production of housing that accommodates populations with special needs, many programs indirectly support housing for those with special needs. Program 5 of the 5th Cycle Housing Element updated the City’s ADU provisions, and this resulted in the production of 35 new ADUs during the 2014–2019 period. ADUs can provide opportunities for those with special needs, such as older adults or those with disabilities, including developmental disabilities, by creating housing in an independent setting while still allowing for support from caregivers who reside on the same lot. Other programs that provide indirect support for those with special needs includes Program 12, which supports very low-income families, older adults, and those with disabilities by providing financial support to assist with rent payments. The City continued to participate in Countywide programs to support lower-income households, including those with special needs, as demonstrated in Programs 9, 10, and 11 providing homeownership assistance to those with the greatest need. Homeownership assistance can free up other household funds so that those with disabilities have additional funding to go toward any needed retrofits that may be better suited to specific needs. Through Program 13, the City continues to contract fair housing services and refers inquires to the fair housing agency.

New programs identified in the 6th Cycle Housing Element more specifically address housing needs and concerns for populations with special needs. These programs include Program 19 to create a portal with resources related to accessibility through things such as home retrofit guides or universal design guidance; Program 6 to develop a program that incentivizes the production of affordable ADUs; and Program 9 to amend the Zoning Code to permit supportive housing by-right, consistent with the requirements of State law.

Page | 5 Appendix A
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *542
Appendix B:

Housing Needs
Assessment
Contents
Appendix B: Housing Needs Assessment............................................................................................1 Demographic Profile.............................................................................................................................4 Population Characteristic Trends........................................................................................................4 Population Count..............................................................................................................................4 Age ......................................................................................................................................................4 Race and Ethnicity.............................................................................................................................5 Economic Characteristics.....................................................................................................................6 Employment Status...........................................................................................................................6 Employment by Industry..................................................................................................................7 Unemployment Rate ........................................................................................................................8 Occupation, Employment Count, and Wages.............................................................................9 Household Characteristics.................................................................................................................10 Household Size................................................................................................................................10 Housing Types and Growth Trends.............................................................................................12 Tenure and Vacancy Rates............................................................................................................13 Housing Age and Condition.........................................................................................................14 Lack of Plumbing Facilities ............................................................................................................16 Household Income and Housing Challenges ................................................................................16 Household Income .........................................................................................................................17 Households Burdened by Housing Cost ....................................................................................20 Lower-Income Households Burdened by Housing Cost.........................................................20 Page | 1 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *543
Overcrowded Households ............................................................................................................21 Large Households...........................................................................................................................22 Single-Parent Households.............................................................................................................23 Housing Costs and Affordability.......................................................................................................23 Median Home Value and Median Rent......................................................................................24 Special Needs Groups........................................................................................................................25 Older Adults.....................................................................................................................................25 Farmworkers ....................................................................................................................................26 Persons with Disabilities.................................................................................................................27 Homelessness..................................................................................................................................30 Available Resources........................................................................................................................32 Preservation of At-Risk Housing ..................................................................................................36 Tables
1 Population Size and Trends by City and County (2000 to 2035)......................................... 4 Age Groups in Lomita (2010, 2019)................................................................................................5 Race and Ethnicity and Trends in Lomita (2010, 2019) .............................................................5 Employment Trends by City, County, and Region (2020 to 2035) .......................................6 Employment Status for Population Age 16 Years and Over in Lomita (2010, 2019)........7 Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over by Industry in Lomita (2010, 2019) .....8 Unemployment Rate for Population Age 16 Years and Older in Civilian 2 3
4 5
6 7
Labor Force in Lomita (2010, 2019)................................................................................................8 8 Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over by Occupation in Lomita (2010, 2019) ............................................................................................................................9 Household Types in Lomita (2010, 2019)....................................................................................10 Average Household Size in Lomita (2010, 2019).......................................................................11 Household Size for Owner-Occupied Units in Lomita (2010, 2019).....................................11 Household Size for Renter-Occupied Units in Lomita (2010, 2019)....................................12 Housing Types by Units in Structure in Lomita (2010, 2019).................................................13 Occupied Housing Units by Tenure in Lomita (2010, 2019)..................................................13 Vacant Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019)............................................................................14 Vacant Rate by Homeowners and Rentals in Lomita (2010, 2019)......................................14 Age of Housing Stock in Lomita...................................................................................................15 Rehabilitated Units by Fiscal Year in Lomita..............................................................................16 Occupied Housing Units Lacking Complete Kitchen or Plumbing 9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 Facilities (2010, 2019)........................................................................................................................16 Page | 2 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *544
20 21
22 Area Median Income Categories .................................................................................................16 Los Angeles County Income Limits for a Four-Person Household (2010, 2020)............17 Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) for Total Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) ..........................................................................................................................17 23 Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 24 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) for Owner-Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) ..........................................................................................................................18 Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) for Renter-Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) ..........................................................................................................................19 Owner-Occupied Median Household Income and Median Home Price in Lomita (2010, 2019)......................................................................................................................19 Renter-Occupied Median Household Income and Median Rent in 25 26
Lomita (2010, 2019) .........................................................................................................................20 Households Burdened by Housing Costs in Lomita (2019)..................................................20 Housing Assistance Needs of Lower-Income Homeowners with a 27 28
Mortgage (2019) ..............................................................................................................................20 Housing Assistance Needs of Lower-Income Renters (2019)...............................................21 Overcrowding in Lomita (2010, 2019).........................................................................................22 Overcrowding by Tenure in Lomita (2019)...............................................................................22 Household Type by Household Size in Lomita (2019)...........................................................22 Single-Parent Households in Lomita (2019) .............................................................................23 Maximum Affordable Price and Rent in Los Angeles County (2019).................................24 Median Value and Median Rent in Lomita (2019) ..................................................................24 Median Gross Rent by Bedroom Count in Lomita (2019).....................................................24 Households with Older Adults in Lomita (2010, 2019)...........................................................25 Farmworkers by Occupation in Lomita (2018).........................................................................26 Employment in the Agriculture Industry in Lomita (2018)....................................................26 Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population with a Disability in Lomita (2019)...................... 27 Disability Type by Age in Lomita (2019) ....................................................................................28 Employment Status by Disability for Civilian Noninstitutionalized 29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
Population 18 to 64 Years in Lomita (2019)..............................................................................29 People Experiencing Homelessness in Service Planning Area Eight .................................30 People Experiencing Homelessness by City and County (2020) ........................................32 Housing Option Definitions..........................................................................................................33 Interim Housing Facilities for those Experiencing Homelessness within 43 44
45 46
Service Planning Area Eight..........................................................................................................33 47 Public and Affordable Housing....................................................................................................34 Page | 3 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *545
Demographic Profile
This section provides detailed information on demographic characteristics and trends that influence supply and demand for various housing types in Lomita. Information includes population, housing, employment, and homelessness counts and trends. This information helped inform the goals, objectives, policies, programs, and activities proposed in this Housing Element.

Population Characteristic Trends
Population Count
According to data provided by the Southern California Association of Governments, Lomita’s population will increase by approximately 1.7 percent between 2020 and 2035. The population growth of Los Angeles County is set to outpace that of Lomita over the same time period, with a projected population increase of approximately 7.4 percent. In 2020, Lomita made up only 0.2 percent of the region’s total population, by 2035, it is expected that Lomita’s share of the population will decrease slightly, making up 0.19 percent. Table 1 provides population sizes and trends for Lomita and Los Angeles County from 2000 to 2035.

Table 1: Population Size and Trends by City and County (2000 to 2035) Location
City of
2000
20,046
2010
20,256
2020
20,549
2035
20,900
2000 to 2035 Change 2020 to 2035 Change
+854 +4.3% +351 +1.7%
Lomita
Los Angeles
County
9,544,000 — 10,407,000 11,174,0
00 +1,630,000 +17.1% +767,000 +7.4%
Sources:

SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments). 2020a. Pre-Certified Local Housing Data for the City of Lomita. August 2020.

SCAG. 2020b. Current Context: Demographics and Growth Forecast. Adopted September 3, 2020. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growthforecast.pdf?1606001579.

SCAG. n.d. 2016‐2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/2016_2040rtpscs_finalgrowthforecastbyjurisdiction.pdf?1605576071.

Age
Age is an important demographic factor for analyzing future housing needs and crafting policies to help meet the specific demands of different age groups. Table 2 provides population sizes by age group in 2010 and 2019. The middle age group (ages 45–64) makes up the largest share of the population (27.6 percent), followed closely by the family-forming age group (26.5 percent). The largest change in population age is in the older adults age group (those age 65 and over), shifting from approximately 11 percent of the population in 2010 to approximately 17.3 percent of the population in 2019—about a 60.9 percent increase.

The City of Lomita (City) will need to implement policies that address the specific needs of Page | 4 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *546
this rising population of older adults, especially given that this age group represents the largest age group of those with disabilities in Lomita.

Table 2: Age Groups in Lomita (2010, 2019)
Age Group 2010 2019 Percent Change
2010 to 2019
-15.2%
Number
5,127
Percent

25.4%
Number
4,350
Percent
Children and Youth (Under 21.2%
Age 18)
College Age (Ages 18–24)
Family-Forming Adults
(Ages 25–44)
1,431
5,820

7.1%

28.9%
1,518
5,431

7.4%

26.5%
+6.1%
-6.7%
Middle Age Adults (Ages 45– 5,599
64)

27.8%
11%
5,661
3,554

27.6%

17.3%
100%
+1.1%
Older Adults (Ages 65 and
Over)
2,209 +60.9%
Total
Median Age
20,186

37.8 100.2% 20,514

40.1 —
—
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021a. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” American Community Survey (ACS) Demographic and Housing Estimates. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey Table ID DP05. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20California%20race&tid= ACSDP5Y2010.DP05&hidePreview=false.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021b. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates.

Data for Lomita. American Community Survey Table ID DP05. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20California%20race&tid=ACSDP5Y2019.DP05&hidePreview=false.

Race and Ethnicity
Lomita is becoming increasingly diverse. Table 3 provides the population by race in Lomita for 2010 and 2019. From 2010 to 2019, Lomita saw its largest percent increase in the American Indian and Alaska Native population (a nearly 166 percent increase), although this population makes up less than 1 percent of Lomita’s total population. The Black population also experienced a significant increase of approximately 150 percent, and the Asian population grew by over 12 percent. In the same time period, Lomita saw its largest decrease in the White population (an approximately 11 percent decrease), although this population still makes up over half of Lomita’s total population (approximately 56.7 percent), and a 6 percent decrease in the Hispanic population.

Table 3: Race and Ethnicity and Trends in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Percent Change
Number 2010 to 2019
13,083
Percent

64.8%
Number
11,634
Percent
White 56.7% -11.1%
Black or African
American
American Indian
and Alaska Native
515 2.6%

0.3%

14.7%
1,285 6.3%

0.8%

16.3%
+149.5%
+165.6%
+12.5%
64 170
Asian 2,966 3,337
Page | 5 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *547
Table 3: Race and Ethnicity and Trends in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Percent Change
Number Percent 2010 to 2019

0.4%
Number Percent
Native Hawaiian
and Other Pacific
Islander
71 69 0.3% -2.8%
Other Alone
Two or More
Races
1,867
1,620

9.2%

8.0%
2,556
1,463

12.5%

7.1%
+36.9%
-9.7%
Total
Hispanic Origin*
20,186
7,247
100%

35.9%
20,514
6,845
100%

33.4%
—
-5.5%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021a, 2021b.
* Persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race or multiple races.

Economic Characteristics
Employment has an important impact on housing needs and the demand for various types of housing. Table 4 provides the employment trends by city, county, and the region from 2020 to 2035. Lomita is projected to add 200 jobs between 2020 and 2035 (approximately a 4 percent increase). These will likely include commercial and entertainment uses within key commercial shopping districts, so housing in Lomita will need to accommodate a range of housing types at prices affordable to the range of household incomes. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average annual pay for retail trade and entertainment in Los Angeles County is approximately $38,500 and $114,579, respectively. By comparison, the projected job growth in both Los Angeles County and the Southern California Association of Governments region is set to outpace the projected job growth in Lomita within the same time frame (with increases of nearly 7 percent and approximately 10 percent, respectively).

Table 4: Employment Trends by City, County, and Region (2020 to 2035) City of Lomita Los Angeles County
2035
SCAG Region
2020 2035 Percent 2020 Percent 2020 2035 Percent
Change
+4.0%
Change
+6.9%
Change
Number of 5,000 +10.0%
Jobs
5,200 4,838,000 5,172,000 8,695,000 9,566,000
Sources: SCAG 2020b, SCAG n.d.

SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments
Employment Status
The employment opportunities in Lomita are located mainly in the commercial retail and service sectors found along the major roadways in Lomita. This limited employment base suggests that most residents work outside Lomita in major employment centers in Torrance, Long Beach, the Port of Long Beach, and the Carson–Compton area. In accordance with the Page | 6 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *548
City’s General Plan Economic Development Element, the City will target its economic development efforts in the following three primary commercial areas:
•
•
•
Downtown Lomita, near the intersection of Lomita Boulevard and Narbonne Avenue Pacific Coast Highway Corridor
East Lomita Boulevard, between Eshelman Avenue and Walnut Street According to the 2019 American Community Survey, 11,058 Lomita residents 16 years and over were in the labor force, and among these residents, 10,684 were employed. Table 5 provides information on employment status in Lomita in 2010 and 2019. From 2010 to 2019, unemployment decreased by approximately 27 percent, and Lomita residents in the Armed Forces experienced a significant increase proportionally (of approximately 1,700 percent).

However, it should be noted that this group still remains only less than 1 percent of the total population of residents age 16 years and over. Additionally, there was about a 16 percent increase in Lomita residents who are not in the labor force; the growing population of older adults may be a primary driving factor, indicating that there is a growing number of residents who are entering retirement.

Table 5: Employment Status for Population Age 16 Years and Over in Lomita (2010, 2019)
Labor Force 2010 2019 Percent Change
Number Percent

0.0%

65.5%

3.1%

31.4%
100%
Number Percent

0.1%

63.9%

2.1%

33.8%

99.9%
2010 to 2019
+1,700.0%
+5.1%
-26.9%
+16.1%
In Armed Forces 1 18
Civilian – Employed
Civilian – Unemployed
Not in Labor Force
10,161
487
4,867
15,516
10,684
356
5,653
Total 16,711 —
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021c. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” Selected Economic Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey Table ID DP03. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20unemployment&tid=ACSDP5Y2010.DP03&hidePreview=false.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021d. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” Selected Economic Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey Table ID DP03. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20unemployment&tid=ACSDP5Y2019.DP03&hidePreview=false.

Employment by Industry
In 2019, Lomita’s top industries included Educational Services and Health Care and Social Assistance (approximately 23.5 percent), Retail Trade (approximately 16.8 percent), and Manufacturing (approximately 10.4 percent) (see Table 6). From 2010 to 2019, the Transportation and Warehousing, and Utilities industry experienced the largest increase (by approximately 56.7 percent), while the Wholesale Trade industry experienced the largest decrease (by approximately 66.4 percent). The Educational Services, and Health Care and Social Assistance industry remained the largest overall (at approximately 23.5 percent), and the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, and Mining industry remained the smallest overall (at less than 1 percent).

Page | 7 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *549
Table 6: Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over by Industry in Lomita (2010, 2019)
2010 2019 Percent
Number
109
Percent Number Percent Change 2010 to Industry
2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and -42.2%
Hunting, and Mining

1.1% 63 0.6%
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation and Warehousing,
and Utilities
572
1,288
459
1,379
586

5.6%

12.7%

4.5%

13.6%

5.8%
659
1,110
154
1,797
918

6.2%

10.4%

1.4%

16.8%

8.6%
+15.2%
-13.8%
-66.4%
+30.3%
+56.7%
Information
Finance and Insurance, and Real
Estate and Rental and Leasing
195
791

1.9%

7.8%
275
497

2.6%

4.7%
+41.0%
-37.2%
Professional, Scientific, and 1,036 10.2% 976 9.1% -5.8% Management, and Administrative
and Waste Management Services
Educational Services, and Health
Care and Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment, and
Recreation, and Accommodation
and Food Services
2,263
788

22.3%

7.8%
2,507
929

23.5%

8.7%
+10.8%
+17.9%
Other Services, except Public
Administration
369 3.6% 392 3.7% +6.2%
Public Administration
Total Civilian Employed
326
10,161

3.2%
100.1%
407
10,684

3.8%
100.1%
+24.8%
—
Population 16 Years and Over
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021c, 2021d.

Unemployment Rate
Lomita’s unemployment rate decreased slightly from 2010 to 2019, as shown in Table 7.

However, on March 19, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom of California issued a Stay-at-Home Order (Executive Order N-33-20) to protect the health and well-being of all Californians and to establish consistency across the State in order to slow the spread of COVID-19. The sudden emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant increases in unemployment throughout the United States. According to the Employment Development Department Bureau of Labor Statistics, Lomita’s unemployment average of 356 persons (2.1 percent) in 2019 increased to 700 persons (7.0 percent) for the month of January 2021.

Table 7: Unemployment Rate for Population Age 16 Years and Older in Civilian Labor Force in Lomita (2010, 2019)
2010 2019
Unemployment Rate 3.1% 2.1%
Page | 8 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *550
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021c, 2021d.

Occupation, Employment Count, and Wages
Table 8 provides information on occupations and earnings of the labor force in Lomita. The majority of Lomita’s labor force in 2019 (40.7 percent) is employed in the Management, Business, Science, and Arts sector, which remains the occupation with the highest median earnings (at about $60,475 in 2019). The second most prevalent occupation is in the Sales and Office sector, which employed 23.5 percent of the labor force, but with almost half the median earnings of that in the Management, Business, Science, and Arts sector ($33,729 in 2019). The third most prevalent occupation is in the Service sector, which is the lowestearning occupation in Lomita ($23,590 in 2019). The Service sector includes occupations related to healthcare support, protective services (such as firefighting and prevention as well as law enforcement), food preparation and serving, building and grounds cleaning and maintenance, and personal care and service. In 2019, the Area Median Income (AMI) for Los Angeles County was $73,100, which means the three most prevalent occupation sectors in Lomita earn less than the AMI for Los Angeles County. Many employees in these sectors may need access to affordable housing options with costs that are restricted below market-rate prices. From 2010 to 2019, the Production, Transportation, and Material Moving sector experienced the largest percent increase in both jobs (an increase of approximately 77.4 percent) and median earnings (an increase of approximately 25.6 percent).

Table 8: Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over by Occupation in Lomita (2010, 2019)
Occupation 2010 2019 Percent Change
Number
3,840
Percent Median Number
4,345
Percent Median Number Median
Earnings
$58,000
Earnings
$60,475
Earnings
Management, +4.3%
Business, Science,
and Arts

37.8% 40.7% +13.2%
Service
Sales and Office
Natural
1,633
2,975
939

16.1%

29.3%

9.2%
$21,199
$30,949
$45,438
1,604
2,511
851

15.0%

23.5%

8.0%
$23,590
$33,729
$45,625
-1.8%
-15.6%
-9.4%
+11.3%
+9.0%
+0.4%
Resources,
Construction, and
Maintenance
Production,
Transportation,
and Material
Moving
774 7.6% $39,524
$37,889
1,373 12.9% $49,639
$45,058
+77.4%
+5.1%
+25.6%
Total 10,161 100.0% 10,684 100.1% +18.9%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021c.

U.S. Census Bureau 2021d.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021e. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Occupation By Sex and Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months (In 2010 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey Table ID S2401. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20occupation&tid=ACSST5Y2010.S2401&hidePreview=false.

Page | 9 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *551
U.S. Census Bureau. 2021f. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Occupation By Sex and Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months (In 2019 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over.

Data for Lomita. American Community Survey Table ID S2411. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20earnings%20by%20occupation&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S2411&hidePreview=false.

Household Characteristics
Household Size
Table 9 provides information on household types in Lomita in 2010 and 2019. From 2010 to 2019, total households in Lomita grew approximately 3.5 percent. Family Households make up the largest share of household types, at 62.5 percent of all households, although the percentage of Family Households decreased slightly from 2010. The largest increase in household type is shown at approximately 25.7 percent of Family Households where the householder is female and there is no spouse present. An increase in the proportion of female heads of households is often cited within public health reviews as a global trend.

Often female heads of households become more socioeconomically vulnerable and are statistically more likely to be unhealthy due to carrying both the burden of working and caring for the family, including childcare and housework. Affordable housing options can help alleviate income-related burdens on female heads of households. Additionally, Nonfamily Households experienced an approximately 12.5 percent increase, which includes an increase in households with roommates and shared living situations.

Table 9: Household Types in Lomita (2010, 2019)
2010 2019 Change
Household Type
Family Households1
Married
Number
5,103
3,818
Percent

65.5%

49.0%

5.3%
Number
5,038
3,615
326
Percent

62.5%

44.8%

4.0%
Number
-65
-203
-87
Percent
-1.3%
-5.3%
Male Householder, No 413
Spouse Present
-21.1%
Female Householder,
No Spouse Present
Nonfamily
Households2
Householder Living
Alone
Householder Not
Living Alone
Total Households
873 11.2%

34.5%

28.9%

5.6%
1,097
3,024
2,515
509

13.6%

37.5%

31.2%

6.3%
+224
+336
+263
+73
+25.7%
+12.5%
+11.7%
+16.7%
+3.5%
2,688
2,252
436
7,791 100% 8,062 100% +271
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021g. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Occupancy Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S2501. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20household%20size&tid=ACSST5Y2010.S2501&hidePreview=false.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021h. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Occupancy Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S2501. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20household%20size&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S2501&hidePreview=false.

Notes:

Page | 10 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *552

1. 2.

A family household is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as a household maintained by a household who is in a family (a group of two or more people related by birth, marriage, or adoption residing together), and includes unrelated people (unrelated subfamily members and/or secondary individuals) who may be residing there.

A nonfamily household is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as a household living alone (a one-person household) or where the household shares the home exclusively with people to whom she/he is not related.

The average household size in Lomita decreased slightly from 2010 to 2019, as shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Average Household Size in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Average Household Size 2.59 2.52 -2.7%
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021i. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Households and Families. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S1101. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20household%20size&tid=ACSST5Y2010.S1101&hidePreview=false.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021j. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Households and Families. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S1101. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20household%20size&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S1101&hidePreview=false.

In 2019, two-person households (approximately 31.5 percent) made up the largest proportion of households in Lomita, although one-person households (approximately 31.2 percent) were just slightly lower. Tables 11 and 12 provide household sizes for owner-occupied and renteroccupied units, respectively, in 2010 and 2019. In 2019, two-person households made up the largest proportion of owner-occupied households (approximately 32.2 percent), and oneperson households made up the largest proportion of renter-occupied households (approximately 35.5 percent). From 2010 to 2019, owner-occupied households experienced a significant increase in three-person households (increase of approximately 85.7 percent), and all other household size categories experienced a decrease (ranging between approximately

1.3 percent and 8.6 percent). The increase in three-person households could be indicative of a number of factors, including an increase of families with children, an increase in older adults residing with family members, or an increase in younger adults staying with family members.

In the same time frame, renter-occupied households experienced a significant decrease in four-or-more-person households (a decrease of approximately 25.3 percent), and all other household size categories experienced an increase (ranging between approximately 4.9 percent and 22.8 percent) (as shown in Table 12).

Table 11: Household Size for Owner-Occupied Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Number
-13
Household Size
One-Person
Household
Number
1,018
Percent

28.0%
Number
1,005
Percent

26.4%
Percent
-1.3%
Two-Person
Household
Three-Person
Household
1,342
371

36.9%

10.2%
1,227
689

32.2%

18.1%
-115 -8.6%
+318 +85.7%
Page | 11 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *553
Table 11: Household Size for Owner-Occupied Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019

23.4%
Change
Four-or-more -1.5%
Person
906 24.9% 892 -14
Household
Total 3,637 100% 3,813 100.1% +176 4.8%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021g, 2021h.

Table 12: Household Size for Renter-Occupied Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Number
+280
Household Size
One-Person
Number
1,230
Percent

29.6%
Number
1,510
Percent

35.5%
Percent
+22.8%
Household
Two-Person
Household
Three-Person
Household
Four-or-more
Person Household
1,250
577

30.1%

13.9%

26.3%

99.9%
1,311
611

30.9%

14.4%

19.2%
100%
+61
+34
-276
+95
+4.9%
+5.9%
-25.3%
+2.3%
1,093 817
Total 4,154 4,249
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021g, 2021h.

Housing Types and Growth Trends
Household size is one factor that influences the demand for multifamily and single-family homes, as well as the size of the units. Table 13 identifies the number of homes within each housing type. From 2010 to 2019, the mobile home, boat, RV, van, etc. housing type experienced the largest decrease (by approximately 21.7 percent). The reason for the decrease is not apparent, but the margin of error in available Census data may explain the decline. Furthermore, data received from the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD) website shows that in 2021, HCD oversaw 16 mobile home parks in Lomita, consisting of 525 total mobile home park spaces. The most prevalent types of housing unit in both 2010 and 2019 were one-unit detached (approximately 49 percent and approximately 51 percent, respectively) and five or more units (approximately 29 percent and approximately 30 percent, respectively). From 2010 to 2019, Lomita experienced significant growth in one-unit detached units (approximately a 7 percent increase) and five or more units (approximately an 8 percent increase). This could be an indicator that there is a desirability in the market to develop both single-family and higher-density multifamily uses.

Given that there is no minimum density requirement in Lomita and opportunities for higherdensity development may be limited, and given that zones that permit multifamily development also permit single-family development, there leaves fewer opportunities for multifamily development.

Page | 12 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *554
Table 13: Housing Types by Units in Structure in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Housing Type
One-Unit, Detached
One-Unit, Attached
Two to Four Units
Five or more Units
Number
4,046
760
456
2,369
607
Percent

49.1%

9.2%

5.6%

28.8%

7.4%
Number
4,315
714
370
2,554
475
Percent

51.2%

8.5%

4.3%

30.3%

5.6%
Number
+269
-46
-86
+185
-132
Percent
+6.6%
-6.1%
-18.9%
+7.8%
Mobile Home, Boat, -21.7%
RV, Van, etc.

Totals 8,238 100% 8,428 100% — —
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021k. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” Selected Housing Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID DP04. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/ table?q=lomita%20city,%20California%20housing%20type&tid=ACSDP5Y2010.DP04&hidePreview=false.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021l. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” Selected Housing Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID DP04. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/ table?q=lomita%20city,%20California%20housing%20type&tid=ACSDP5Y2019.DP04&hidePreview=false.

Tenure and Vacancy Rates
Housing tenure and vacancy rates are important indicators of the supply and cost of housing, as well as income. Housing tenure refers to whether a housing unit is owned or rented.

Tenure is an important market characteristic because it is directly related to housing types.

Vacancy rates are indicative of whether or not there is a sufficient supply of available housing at a given point in time. A healthy vacancy rate is considered to be at around 5 percent, demonstrating that there are desirable housing options available when one is searching in the market.

The ratio of owner-occupied units versus renter-occupied units is an indicator of financial stability. Table 14 identifies the occupied housing units by tenure in Lomita in 2010 and 2019.

In 2019, approximately 47 percent of Lomita’s occupied housing stock was owner-occupied and approximately 53 percent was renter-occupied. Of the owner-occupied units, approximately 67 percent of those households had a mortgage and 33 percent of those households did not have a mortgage, indicating that most owner-occupied households have been in Lomita long enough to have completed their mortgage payments (likely more than 30 years).

Table 14: Occupied Housing Units by Tenure in Lomita (2010, 2019) Housing Unit Type 2010 2019 Change
Number Percent
+176
Number
3,637
Percent

46.7%
Number
3,813
Percent
Owner-Occupied Housing 47.3%
Units
Renter-Occupied Housing
Units
Total Occupied Housing
Units
+4.8%

2.3%
—
4,154
7,791

53.3%
100%
4,249
8,062

52.7%
100%
+95
—
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021g, 2021h, 2021i, 2021j.

Page | 13 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *555
Tables 15 and 16 provide the number of vacant units and vacancy rates, respectively, in Lomita in 2010 and 2019. While a healthy vacancy is considered to be approximately 5 percent, both homeowner and rental vacancy rates remained below this 5 percent threshold in 2019, and even experienced a decrease since 2010. Considering that total housing units increased by approximately 2 percent since 2010, a decreasing vacancy rate indicates that there are not enough vacant units or enough new units being developed to support mobility within Lomita. This also indicates that the regional job market is likely providing more opportunities than the housing market can keep up with, resulting in not enough housing to meet demand. However, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has complicated the imbalance of jobs and housing across the nation, as job losses, evictions, and relocations occur. Given the uncertainty surrounding this public health crisis, it is unclear if the vacancy rate will grow due to the impacts of the pandemic or will decline due to a supply that does not meet demand.

Table 15: Vacant Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019)
Housing Unit Type 2010 2019 Change
Number
-81
+271
Number
447
7,791
Percent

5.4%

94.6%
Number
366
8,062
Percent

4.3%

95.7%
Percent
-18.1%
+3.5%
Total Vacant Housing Units
Total Occupied Housing
Units
Total Housing Units 8,238 100% 8,428 100%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021k, 2021l.

Table 16: Vacant Rate by Homeowners and Rentals in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019
Homeowner Vacancy Rate
Rental Vacancy Rate

1.0 3.1

0.6 2.4
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021k, 2021l.

Housing Age and Condition
Housing age is commonly used by State and Federal programs to estimate rehabilitation needs. Typically, most homes begin to require major repairs or rehabilitation at 30 or 40 years of age. Factors commonly used to determine housing conditions are age of housing, overcrowding, homeowner income, and lack of plumbing facilities.

Residential neighborhoods between Pacific Coast Highway and Lomita Boulevard were constructed on large lots from the 1940s through the 1960s. They contain many of Lomita’s older housing units. Neighborhoods south of Pacific Coast Highway were developed during the 1970s and 1980s and consist largely of newer housing units on uniform-sized lots in subdivisions.

To understand the rehabilitation needs for Lomita, the age of housing, overcrowding of housing, and homeowner income were considered. As provided in Table 17, approximately

78.9 percent of the housing stock is over 40 years old (built in or before 1979). Over 98 percent of Lomita’s housing stock was built prior to 2000. Further, approximately 4.5 percent Page | 14 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *556
of households are considered overcrowded or severely overcrowded, and nearly 30 percent of lower-income homeowners are cost burdened by housing. Based on the percentage of the housing stock over 40 years old and cost-burdened homeowners, there is likely a need for housing rehabilitation assistance.

A high estimate of the number of units in need of rehabilitation, based solely on the age of the housing stock, is approximately 6,003 units. However, regular maintenance and remediation of many units suggests that much of this needed rehabilitation may be minimal and isolated to just small upgrades and repairs. The number of units in need of substantial rehabilitation is likely much lower.

The Code Enforcement Division works to address complaints related to housing issues. The most common complaints include overgrown vegetation, illegal dumping or improper waste container storage, and work without permits. The number of code enforcement cases that received a case file in 2020 was 141 and 173 in 2019.

Further, the City works with lower-income homeowners to address building safety and health code violations of dwelling units. These units are those that are in substantial need of rehabilitation. Given that the City assisted with the rehabilitation of 81 housing units in the 5th Cycle Housing Element, it can be estimated that a similar number of units will require substantial rehabilitation during the 6th Cycle (approximately 81 units). This number also closely correlates to those units lacking kitchen or plumbing facilities, as provided below.

Table 17: Age of Housing Stock in Lomita
Year Built Number Percent*
2014 or later
2010 to 2013
2000 to 2009
1980 to 1999
1960 to 1979
1940 to 1959
1939 or earlier
Total
125
23 342
1,295
3,250
1,830
923

1.5%

0.3%

4.1%

15.4%

38.6%

29.3%

11.0%
8,428 100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2021l.
* Total may not sum due to rounding.

The City’s Housing Rehabilitation Grant Program provides funding for eligible low-income homeowners for the correction of building safety and health code violations and correction of hazardous structural conditions. The grant program is funded with Community Development Block Grant funds and is restricted to lower-income homeowners who meet the current U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) income guidelines.

During the 5th Cycle Housing Element, Lomita had from 3 to 20 rehabilitated housing units per year, as shown in Table 18. Therefore, a low estimate of the number of units in need of rehabilitation during the 6th Cycle planning period, based solely on the number of units Page | 15 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *557
rehabilitated from 2014 to 2021, is about 81 units. In the 2020–2021 fiscal year, three units were rehabilitated through this program; however, the program was put on hold in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Table 18: Rehabilitated Units by Fiscal Year in Lomita
Fiscal Year Number of Units Rehabilitated
2014–2015
2015–2016
2016–2017
2017–2018
2018–2019
2019–2020
20 15
13 12
8 10
2020–2021 (as of February 2021) 3
Source: City of Lomita. 2021. Community Development Block Grant: Residential Rehabilitation Program Data.

Lack of Plumbing Facilities
Table 19 provides the number of occupied housing units lacking complete kitchen or plumbing facilities in 2010 and 2019. About 1.1 percent of all housing units in 2019 lacked a complete kitchen facility (an improvement since 2010) and about 0.5 percent lacked complete plumbing facilities (a significant deterioration since 2010). It is likely that there is overlap between these two factors, indicating that many units that lack complete kitchen facilities may also lack complete plumbing facilities.

Table 19: Occupied Housing Units Lacking Complete Kitchen or Plumbing Facilities (2010, 2019)
2010 2019 Percent Change
Facility Type
Lacking Complete Kitchen Facilities
Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities
Number
102
13 Percent

1.3%

0.2%
Number
87 41
Percent

1.1%

0.5%
-14.7%
+215.4%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021k, 2021l.

Household Income and Housing Challenges
High housing costs compared to household income create housing challenges for households whose incomes fall below AMI and can lead to overcrowding. AMI is calculated based on gross annual income, adjusted by family size. A four-person household is used as the standard for the base calculation for the median income, and income categories are based on a percentage of the AMI, adjusted by the number of people in a household per their income category. Tables 20 and 21 provide the AMI income categories and income limits for 2010 and 2020, respectively.

Table 20: Area Median Income Categories
Category Description
Extremely Low-Income Gross household income equal to 30% or less of AMI.

Page | 16 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *558
Very Low-Income
Low-Income
Moderate-Income
Gross household income equal to 50% or less of AMI.

Gross household income equal to 80% or less of AMI.

Gross household income equal to 120% or less of AMI.

Above Moderate Income Gross household income equal to 121% or more of AMI.

AMI = Area Median Income
Table 21: Los Angeles County Income Limits for a Four-Person Household (2010, 2020)
Income Limit 2010 2020
Median Income
Low Income (80% AMI)
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
Moderate Income (120% AMI)
$63,000
$66,250
$41,400
$24,850
$75,600
$77,300
$90,100
$56,300
$33,800
$92,760
Source: HUD (Office of Housing and Urban Development). 2021. Income Limits Datasets. HUD, Office of Policy Development and Research. Accessed March 2021. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il.html.

AMI = Area Median Income.

Household Income
Table 22 provides the household income in the past 12 months for total occupied housing units in 2010 and 2019. From 2010 to 2019, the overall median household income for occupied housing units increased by approximately 14.6 percent. By comparison, owneroccupied household median income increased by approximately 28.2 percent, and renteroccupied household median income increased by approximately 4.1 percent.

Among total occupied housing units, household incomes of $150,000 or more experienced the largest increase (by approximately 65.7 percent), and household incomes between $10,000 and $14,999 experienced the largest decrease (by approximately 34.0 percent). As of 2019, approximately 47 percent of households had a household income of $75,000 or higher, indicating that approximately half of all households make less than the median income of $71,606.

The 2019 estimated number of existing extremely low-income households is nearly 2,000.

HCD provides guidance on estimating the projected housing need for extremely low-income households by presuming 50 percent of the very low-income housing target. Lomita’s share of the 6th Cycle Housing Element target for very low-income households is 239 units, leaving the extremely low-income housing need at approximately 120 housing units.

Table 22: Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 InflationAdjusted Dollars) for Total Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Household Income
Less than $5,000
Number
234
Percent

3.0%
Number
167
Percent

2.1%
Number
-67
Percent
-28.6%
$5,000 to $9,999 148
467
335
343

1.9%

6.0%

4.3%

4.4%
234
308
417
371

2.9%

3.8%

5.2%

4.6%
+86
-159
+82
+28
+58.1%
-34.0%
+24.5%
+8.2%
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $24,999
Page | 17 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *559
Table 22: Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 InflationAdjusted Dollars) for Total Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Household Income
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,000
$150,000 or more
Total
Number
608
997
1,597
1,036
1,176
849
7,791
$62,464
Percent

7.8%
Number
499
832
1,442
854
1,531
1,407
8,062
$71,606
Percent

6.2%
Number
-109
-165
-155
-182
+355
+558
+271
+$9,142
Percent
-17.9%
-16.5%
-9.7%
-17.6%
+30.2%
+65.7%
+3.5%
+14.6%

12.8%

20.5%

13.3%

15.1%

10.9%
100%

10.3%

17.9%

10.6%

19.0%

17.5%
100.1%
Median
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021m. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Financial Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S2503. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table? q=lomita,%20ca%20income&tid=ACSST5Y2010.S2503&hidePreview=false.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021n. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Financial Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S2503. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table? q=lomita,%20ca%20income&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S2503&hidePreview=false Table 23 provides the household income in the past 12 months for owner-occupied housing units in 2010 and 2019. Compared to total households, approximately 65.4 percent of owneroccupied households make over $75,000. Among owner-occupied households, those households in income categories below the AMI for owner-occupied units saw drops, with the exception of a dramatic increase of those earning between $5,000 and $9,000 a year. In juxtaposition to the change among lower-income earners, those earning $150,000 or more saw the second highest increase in number of households, at a 63 percent increase, and households making between $100,000 and $149,000 also increased by 27.8 percent.

Table 23: Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 InflationAdjusted Dollars) for Owner-Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Household Income
Less than $5,000
$5,000 to $9,999
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,000
$150,000 or more
Total
Number Percent

2.4%

0.7%

2.3%

3.8%

5.2%

7.4%

6.2%

15.2%

14.9%

21.4%

20.5%
100%
Number
84 118
42 63
155
64 254
540
286
994
1,213
3,813
$109,879
Percent

2.2%

3.1%

1.1%

1.7%

4.1%

1.7%

6.7%

14.2%

7.5%
Number
-3
+93
-42
-75
-34
-205
+29
Percent
-3.4%
+372.0%
-50.0%
-54%
-18.0%
-76.2%
+12.9%
-2.4%
-47.2%
+27.8%
+62.6%

4.8%
87 25
84 138
189
269
225
553
542
778
746
-13
-256
+216
+467
+176
+$24,200

26.1%

31.8%
3,637 100.2%
Median $85,679 +28.2%
Page | 18 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *560
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau 2021m, 2021n.

Table 24 provides the household income in the past 12 months for renter-occupied housing units in 2010 and 2019. Compared to owner-occupied households, only approximately 30.6 percent of rental-occupied households make over $75,000. However, among renteroccupied housing units, households with incomes of $150,000 or more experienced the largest increase (by approximately 86.5 percent), while household incomes of less than $5,000 experienced the largest decrease (by approximately 42.8 percent).

Table 24: Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2010 and 2019 InflationAdjusted Dollars) for Renter-Occupied Housing Units in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Number
-62
Household Income
Less than $5,000
$5,000 to $9,999
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,000
$150,000 or more
Total
Number
145
125
382
195
154
336
773
1,039
498
Percent

3.5%
Number Percent

2.0%
Percent
83 -42.8%

3.0%

9.2%

4.7%

3.7%

8.1%

18.6%

25.0%

12.0%

9.6%

2.5%

99.9%
116
266
354
216
435
578
902
568
537
194
4,249
$51,045

2.7%

6.3%

8.3%

5.1%

10.2%

13.6%

21.2%

13.4%

12.6%

4.6%
-9 -7.2%
-116
+159
+62
-30.4%
+81.5%
+40.3%
+29.5%
-25.2%
-13.2%
+14.1%
+34.6%
+86.5%
+2.3%
+4.1%
+99
-195
-137
+70
+138
+90
399
104
4,154
$49,021
100% +95
Median +2,024
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021m, 2021n.

Table 25 provides the owner-occupied median household income and median home price in Lomita in 2010 and 2019. From 2010 to 2019, the percent increase in median household income for owner-occupied units far outpaced the increase in median home price. Further, in contrast to owner-occupied households, the increase in annual median rent far outpaced the increase in median household income for renter-occupied units, as shown in Table 26.

Further, renter incomes increased at a dramatically lower rate than those of homeowners.

This indicates that incomes of renters are not keeping up with increasing rent amounts, and homeownership opportunities are becoming further out of reach.

Table 25: Owner-Occupied Median Household Income and Median Home Price in Lomita (2010, 2019)
2010 2019
$109,879
$604,300
Number Change
+$24,200
+$72,200
Percent Change
+28.2%
+13.6%
Median Household Income $85,679
Median Home Price $532,100
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021k, 2021l, 2021m, 2021n.

Page | 19 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *561
Table 26: Renter-Occupied Median Household Income and Median Rent in Lomita (2010, 2019)
2010 2019 Number Change
+$2,024
+$3,060
Percent Change
+4.1%
+22.4%
Median Household Income $49,021
Median Rent (annual) $13,668
$51,045
$16,728
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021k, 2021l, 2021m, 2021n.

Households Burdened by Housing Cost
Table 27 provides the total households burdened by housing costs in Lomita in 2019.

Approximately 51 percent of rental households in Lomita spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing, and approximately 37 percent of homeowner households with a mortgage spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Approximately 33 percent of all homeowner households do not have a mortgage. As rents continue to rise, outpacing median income, more rental households will continue to be burdened by housing costs, leaving homeownership further out of reach for many.

Table 27: Households Burdened by Housing Costs in Lomita (2019) Households with a Mortgage Households Paying Rent
Total 2,569
63%
4,249
Less than 30% of Income Spent on 48.8%
Housing
More than 30% of Income Spent on
Housing
37% 51.2%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021l.

Lower-Income Households Burdened by Housing Cost
In 2019, AMI for Los Angeles County was $73,100. Tables 28 and 29 show the percentage of homeowners and renters, respectively, who are cost burdened within each income category.

Nearly 30 percent of lower-income households with a mortgage and approximately 50 percent of all renter households were burdened by the cost of housing, meaning they spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Further, approximately 4.6 percent of extremely low-income households with a mortgage were burdened by the cost of housing and approximately 75 percent of extremely low-income renter households were burdened by the cost of housing.

Table 28: Housing Assistance Needs of Lower-Income Homeowners with a Mortgage (2019)
Household Income
Household Income <$20,000
Household Income $20,000 to $34,999
Household Income $35,000 to $49,999
Household Income $50,000 to $74,999
Household Income $75,000 or more
Percent of Cost-Burdened Households by Income

3.4%

1.2%

4.6%

12.9%

14.9%
Page | 20 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *562
Total 32.4%
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021o. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Financial Characteristics for Housing Units with a Mortgage. Data for United States. American Community Survey, Table ID S2506. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=United%20States&t=Income%20and%20Poverty&g=1600000US0642468&y= 2019&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S2506&hidePreview=false.

Table 29: Housing Assistance Needs of Lower-Income Renters (2019) Household Income Number of Households Number of Cost-Burdened Percent of CostHouseholds 133
Burdened Households
Household Income 199 66.8%
<$10,000
Household Income
$10,000 to $19,999
Household Income
$20,000 to $34,999
Household Income
$35,000 to $49,999
Household Income
$50,000 to $74,999
Household Income
$75,000 to $99,000
Household Income
$100,000 or more
620
651
578
902
568
731
4,249
419
561
497
393
62 67.6%

86.2%

86.0%

43.6%

10.9%
50 6.8%
Total 2,115 49.8%
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021p. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables.” Household Income by Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income in the Past 12 Months. American Community Survey, Table ID B25074. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=Renter%20Costs&t=Income%20and%20Poverty&g= 1600000US0642468&y=2019&tid=ACSDT5Y2019.B25074&hidePreview=false.

Overcrowded Households
Overcrowding is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as a housing unit occupied by more than one person per room. A severely overcrowded household is defined as one with more than 1.5 persons per room. From 2010 to 2019, the total proportion of households considered to be overcrowded decreased by about 17 percent, and the total proportion of households considered to be severely overcrowded decreased by about 74 percent, as shown in Table 30.

Lower rates of overcrowding may lead to more positive health outcomes. For example, studies have shown that there is a strong correlation between crowded households and the probability of COVID-19 infection.1 In particular, crowded households provide less opportunities for a person infected with COVID-19 to isolate themselves from the rest of the household.2 1 2
Columbia University Irving Medical Center. 2020. “Crowded Homes, Poor Neighborhoods Linked to COVID-19.” June 18, 2020. https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/crowded-homes-poor-neighborhoods-linked-covid-19.

Botts, J., and L. Bénichou. 2020. “The neighborhoods where COVID collides with overcrowded homes.” CalMatters. June 12, 2020, Updated June 26, 2020. https://calmatters.org/projects/california-coronavirus-overcrowded-neighborhoods-homes/.

Page | 21 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *563
Table 30: Overcrowding in Lomita (2010, 2019)
2010 2019 Percent
Type of Overcrowding Change
Overcrowded (>1 and ≤1.5 occupants/room)
Severely Overcrowded (>1.5 occupants/room)
Number
380
179
Percent

4.9%

2.3%
Number
315
46 Percent

3.9%

0.6%
-17.1%
-74.3%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021k, 2021l.

Table 31 provides information on overcrowding by tenure in Lomita in 2019. The vast majority of both owner- and renter-occupied units had one or fewer occupants per room. While both owner- and renter-occupied units had relatively low levels of units considered crowded (approximately 3.1 percent and 4.6 percent), only renter-occupied units experienced any degree of severe overcrowding (approximately 1.1 percent). Overall, renter-occupied units experienced disproportionately higher rates of overcrowding and severe overcrowding than owner-occupied units.

Table 31: Overcrowding by Tenure in Lomita (2019)
Number of Occupants Per Owner-Occupied Units
Number Percent
Renter-Occupied Units
Room Number Percent

1.00 or fewer

1.01 to 1.50

1.51 or more
Total
3,693
120
0 96.9%

3.1%

0.0%
4,008
195
46 94.3%

4.6%

1.1%
3,813 100% 4,249 100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2021h.

Large Households
Large families are defined by HUD as families with five or more members. Many large households have special housing needs because they tend to have lower household income and have few options or access to adequately sized, affordable housing. In 2019, there were a total of 575 large households, accounting for 7.1 percent of all households in Lomita, as shown in Table 32. Of those large households approximately 167 were renters. Further, as detailed in Table 13, in 2019 there were 2,554 housing units with 5 or more bedrooms. Of the units in the City, there are 138 renter occupied housing units with 4 or more bedrooms and 931 owner occupied housing units with 4 or more bedrooms. While there may be enough large housing units in Lomita to meet the large household ownership needs, many large households that rent need financial assistance to help with housing affordability or support in entering the housing market.

Table 32: Household Type by Household Size in Lomita (2019) Household Size Number Percent
Family households
Two- to four-person household
Five-person household
5,038
4,463
396
100%

88.6%

7.9%
Page | 22 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *564
Table 32: Household Type by Household Size in Lomita (2019) Household Size Number Percent
Six-person household
Seven-or-more-person household
Nonfamily households
One- to four-person household
Five-person household
130
49 3,024
3,024
0 2.6%

1.0%
100%
100%
0%
Six-person household 0 0%
Seven-or-more-person household 0 0%
Total households 8,062 —
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021q. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables.” Household Type by Household Size.

Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID B11016. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20b11016&tid=ACSDT5Y2019.B11016&hidePreview=false.

Single-Parent Households
Table 33 provides the number of single-parent households in Lomita. In 2019, single-parent households made up approximately 6 percent of all households in Lomita, and women were the head of about 89 percent of all single-parent households. As previously discussed, there was an increase of approximately 25.7 percent of household types where the householder is female and there is no spouse present.

Table 33: Single-Parent Households in Lomita (2019)
Households
Total households with children under the age of 18
Single-parent households
Number Percent*

29.6%

6.4%

5.7%
2,389
519
Single-parent households headed by women 463
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021r. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” Selected Social Characteristics in the United States. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID DP02. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20California%20single%20parent&tid=ACSDP5Y2019.

DP02&hidePreview=false.
* Of all households (8,062).

Housing Costs and Affordability
Housing affordability is dependent on income and housing costs. The Federal standard of rental affordability is that a household should spend no more than 30 percent of its gross income on monthly housing costs and utilities. In 2019, the AMI for Los Angeles County was $73,100, indicating that the healthy maximum housing cost for the median income household should not exceed $21,930 a year or 1,828 per month. The maximum affordability of housing costs per household is further detailed below and provided in Table 34.

Page | 23 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *565
Table 34: Maximum Affordable Price and Rent in Los Angeles County (2019) Household Income Category Annual Income Maximum Affordable Monthly Payment for Housing and Utilities
Two-Person
Extremely Low $25,050 $626
Very Low
Low
Median
Moderate
$41,800
$66,800
$58,500
$70,150
$1,045
$1,670
$1,462
$1,754
Four-Person
Extremely Low
Very Low
Low
Median
Moderate
$31,300
$52,200
$83,500
$73,100
$87,700
$782
$1,305
$2,088
$1,827
$2,193
Source:

California Department of Housing and Community Development. 2019. “State Income Limits for 2019.” Memorandum from Z. Olmstead (Deputy Director, Division of Housing Policy Development) to Interested Parties. May 6, 2019. https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/income-limits/state-and-federal-income-limits/docs/income-limits-2019.pdf.

Median Home Value and Median Rent
In Lomita, the median home value in 2019 for owner-occupied units was $604,300 and median monthly rent was $1,394. Table 35 provides the median value and median rent in Lomita, and Table 36 provides the gross median rent by bedroom count in 2019. For perspective, a 30-year fixed mortgage at a 4 percent interest rate can cost approximately $2,865 a month, and that price will vary depending on the amount of the down payment provided. Down payments at 20 percent or more will help buyers obtain lower interest rates, which tend to fluctuate from day-to-day, leaving homeownership out of reach for lower- and even moderate-income households. Monthly rents are out of reach for extremely lowincome households and even some very low-income households. Further, when all other household costs are considered, such as student loan payments, payments for childcare, the costs of transportation, utilities, and other standard payments, housing attainability leaves many households at varying income levels constrained.

Table 35: Median Value and Median Rent in Lomita (2019) Value/Rent 2019
Median value for owner-occupied units
Median monthly rent for occupied units paying rent
$604,300
$1,394
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2021l.

Table 36: Median Gross Rent by Bedroom Count in Lomita (2019) Number of Bedrooms Median Gross Rent
No Bedroom $1,065
Page | 24 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *566
Table 36: Median Gross Rent by Bedroom Count in Lomita (2019) Number of Bedrooms Median Gross Rent
One Bedroom
Two Bedrooms
Three Bedrooms
Four Bedrooms
$1,162
$1,475
$1,874
$3,331
Five or More Bedrooms —
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021s. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables.” Median Gross Rent by Bedrooms. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID B25031. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20median%20rent%20by%20bedroom&tid=ACSDT5Y2019.B25031& hidePreview=false.

Special Needs Groups
Groups with special needs can face increased challenges in housing. Individuals experiencing homelessness and in need of emergency shelter, older adults, persons with disabilities, large families, farmworkers, and families with a female head of household often have difficulty finding housing to meet their specific needs. This section provides an analysis of special needs groups in Lomita. Policies and programs to address these needs are incorporated throughout the Housing Element.

Older Adults
Older adults refer to those who are age 65 and older. Like in many cities across California, the population of older adults is increasing in Lomita, and housing that meets the changing needs of this demographic is becoming increasingly important. Older adults share four common characteristics:
•
•
•
•
Income: People over 65 are usually retired and living on a fixed income.

Healthcare: Accounts for an increasing proportion of older adults’ expenses.

Transportation: Many older adults require assistance with transportation.

Housing: Many live alone, and their homes require modifications to meet changing levels of ability.

These characteristics indicate a need for smaller, lower-cost housing with easy access to transit, healthcare facilities, and other services. In 2019, more than 31 percent of the total households had a resident aged 65 years or older—an increase of approximately 46 percent since 2010, as shown in Table 37. In the same time period, there was approximately an 82 percent increase in householders 65 years and over living alone.

Table 37: Households with Older Adults in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Number
1,722
Percent

22.1%
Number
2,520
Percent

31.3%
Number
+798
Percent
Households with One or More Person 65 +46.3%
Years and Over
Page | 25 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *567
Table 37: Households with Older Adults in Lomita (2010, 2019) 2010 2019 Change
Number
633
Percent

8.1%
Number
1,152
Percent

14.3%
Number
+519
Percent
Householder Living Alone (65 Years and +82.0%
Over)
Sources:

U.S. Census Bureau 2021r.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021t. “2010: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.” Selected Social Characteristics in the United States. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID DP02. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=lomita%20city,%20California%20single%20parent&tid=ACSDP5Y2010.DP02 &hidePreview=false.

Farmworkers
Statewide, farmworker housing is of unique concern and of unique importance. While only a small share of the Southern California Association of Governments jurisdictions has farmworkers living in them, they are essential to the region’s economy and food supply.

Although there are no farmworker jobs in Lomita (see Table 38), there were approximately 39 people employed in the agriculture industry in 2018 (see Table 39). This represents a very small portion of total workers in Lomita, indicating that there is little need to plan for farmworker housing in Lomita. Further, in 2019 there were approximately 63 jobs in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining industries in Lomita. However, those were all reported to be in sales and office occupations, service occupations, and management, business, science, and arts occupations. None of the farmworker jobs in Lomita in 2018 or 2019 were in production, transportation, or the moving of materials.

Table 38: Farmworkers by Occupation in Lomita (2018)
Number of Percent of Total Lomita SCAG Total Description Farmworkers Workers

0.0%

0.0%
0 0
57,741
31,521
Total jobs: Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations
Full-time, year-round jobs: Farming, fishing, and
forestry occupations
Source: SCAG 2020a
SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments.

Table 39: Employment in the Agriculture Industry in Lomita (2018) Number Employed in
Agriculture Industry
Percent of Total
Lomita Workers
SCAG Total Description
25 14

0.2%

0.2%
73,778
44,979
Total in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
Full-time, year-round in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
Source: SCAG 2020a
SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments.

Page | 26 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *568
Persons with Disabilities
Several Federal and State statutes affect the provision of housing for persons with disabilities.

The Fair Housing Act (1968) prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all types of housing transactions, and defines “persons with a disability” as those individuals with mental or physical impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities. The Fair Housing Amendments Act (1988) requires local jurisdictions to “make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.” The 2010 Census defines six types of disabilities: sensory, physical, mental, self-care, gooutside-home, and employment. The Census defines sensory and physical disabilities as “long-lasting conditions.” Mental, self-care, go-outside-home, and employment disabilities are defined as conditions lasting 6 months or more that make it difficult to perform certain activities. A more detailed description of each disability is provided:
•
•
Sensory: Blindness, deafness, or severe vision or hearing impairment.

Physical: A condition that substantially limits one or more basic physical activities, such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying. • Mental: A mental condition lasting more than 6 months that impairs learning, remembering, or concentrating.
•
•
Self-care: A condition that restricts the ability to dress, bathe, or get around inside the home.

Go-outside-home: A condition that restricts the ability to go outside the home alone to shop or visit a doctor’s office.
• Employment: A condition that restricts the ability to work at a job or business.

Disability by Type
Table 40 provides the population with a disability in Lomita in 2019. In 2019, approximately 11 percent (2,198) of Lomita’s population had a disability and approximately 27 percent of those age 65 and older had a disability. Because older adults make up the largest subgroup of those with a disability, as older adults continue to age, the need for housing to meet varying levels of ability will become increasingly vital.

Table 40: Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population with a Disability in Lomita (2019) Disability Type Number Percent of Population
Hearing difficulty
Vision difficulty
Cognitive difficulty
Ambulatory difficulty
Self-care difficulty
496
322
884
1,234
481

2.4%

1.6%

4.7%

6.6%

2.6%

5.0%

11.0%
Independent living difficulty
Total
804
2,198
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021u. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables.” Disability Characteristics. Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID S1810. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/ table?q=lomita%20city,%20disability%20type&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S1810&hidePreview=false.

Page | 27 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *569
Disability by Age
Among those under 18 years old, the largest proportion of disabilities is cognitive. Among those age 18 years and older, the largest proportion of disabilities is ambulatory. Table 41 provides the disability type by age in Lomita in 2019.

Table 41: Disability Type by Age in Lomita (2019)
Disability Type Number
20,379
Percent of Population
Total Population —
Total Population with a disability
Population under 18 years old
Population with a disability under 18 years old
Hearing difficulty
Vision difficulty
Cognitive difficulty
Ambulatory difficulty
Self-care difficulty
Independent living difficulty
Population 18 to 64 years old
Population with a disability 18 to 64 years old
Hearing difficulty
Vision difficulty
Cognitive difficulty
Ambulatory difficulty
Self-care difficulty
Independent living difficulty
Population 65 years and over
Population with a disability 65 years and over
Hearing difficulty
Vision difficulty
Cognitive difficulty
2,198
4,350
66 13
0 53
0 0
—
12,559
1,191
125
173
499
653
166
419
3,470
941
358
149
332
581
315
385

10.8%
—

1.5%

0.3%

0.0%

1.9%

0.0%

0.0%
—
—

9.5%

1.0%

1.4%

4.0%

5.2%

1.3%

3.3%
—

27.1%

10.3%

4.3%

9.6%

16.7%

9.1%

11.1%
Ambulatory difficulty
Self-care difficulty
Independent living difficulty
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau 2021u.

Disability by Employment Status
Table 42 provides the employment status by disability in Lomita in 2019. Among the civilian noninstitutionalized population age 18 to 64 years in 2019, the unemployment rate for those with a disability was approximately 10 percent, and the unemployment rate for those without a disability was approximately 3 percent. In 2019, the overall unemployment rate for the population 16 years and older in the civilian labor force was approximately 2 percent. This indicates that persons with disabilities may have more difficulty finding work than the overall population.

Page | 28 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *570
Table 42: Employment Status by Disability for Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population 18 to 64 Years in Lomita (2019)
With a Disability No Disability
Employment Number
540
58 593
Percent of
Total

45.3%

4.9%

49.8%
Percent of Total Number
9,300
275
1,793
Percent of
Total

81.8%

2.4%

15.8%
Percent of Total
Status
Employed
Unemployed
Not in Labor
Force
in Labor Force in Labor Force

90.3%

9.7%
—

97.1%

2.9%
—
Total
Total in Labor
Force
1,191
598
100%

50.2%
—
100%
11,368
9,575
100%

84.2%
—
100%
Source:

U.S. Census Bureau. 2021v. “2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Detailed Tables.” Employment Status by Disability Status.

Data for Lomita. American Community Survey, Table ID C18120. Accessed March 2021. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=lomita%20disability%20by%20employment&tid=ACSDT5Y2019.C18120&hidePreview=false.

Persons with Developmental Disabilities
According to Section 4512 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code, a “Developmental Disability” is a disability that originates before an individual reaches 18 years of age, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual, which includes intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism.

The U.S. Census describes a “Cognitive Disability” as an intellectual impairment that causes one to have difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions. Cognitive disabilities include mental and emotional conditions, such as an intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, autism, an emotional condition, or another developmental disability that often results in difficulty getting along with other children, doing schoolwork, or making decisions. Many persons with developmental disabilities can live and work independently within a conventional housing environment. However, the most severely affected individuals may require an institutional environment where medical attention and physical therapy are provided. Because developmental disabilities exist before adulthood, the first issue in supportive housing for the developmentally disabled is the transition from the person’s living situation as a child to an appropriate level of independence as an adult.

The State Department of Developmental Services currently provides services and support to individuals with developmental disabilities. Services are provided through state-operated developmental centers and community facilities and contracts with 21 nonprofit regional centers. The Harbor Regional Center serves the health districts of Bellflower, Harbor, Long Beach, and Torrance within the City of Los Angeles.3 The Harbor Regional Center served a 3 DDS (California Department of Developmental Services). 2021. “Regional Center Listings.” Accessed March 2021. https://www.dds.ca.gov/rc/listings.

Page | 29 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *571
total of 15,148 clients in 2020, of which 12,922 (approximately 85 percent) were clients with developmental disabilities in the community.4
Homelessness
The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) is a joint powers authority of the City of Los Angeles and County of Los Angeles created in 1993 to address the needs of those experiencing homelessness in Los Angeles County. LAHSA is the lead agency in the HUDfunded Los Angeles Continuum of Care, and coordinates and manages over $70 million annually in Federal, State, County, and city funds for programs providing shelter, housing, and services to people experiencing homelessness.

LAHSA conducts the annual point-in-time counts for Lomita and the greater Los Angeles region. Data for both Lomita and its designated Service Planning Area (SPA) is provided in the point-in-time counts. To ensure local control and planning, Los Angeles County is divided into eight geographic areas designated as SPAs, which are designed for planning and tracking data relative to public health and social services. Each SPA is expected to have a balance of homelessness services. Lomita is located within SPA Eight. The SPA approach to balancing services among larger geographical areas ensures that homelessness is treated as a regional housing issue, rather than a city-specific issue. This approach is important for addressing solutions comprehensively. Further, a recent ballot initiative was approved by the voters, demonstrating region-wide and local community support for solutions to meet the needs of those experiencing homelessness. After being approved by voters in March 2017, Measure H went into effect in 2018, raising the sales tax countywide by a quarter-percent to raise money for homeless services, which will be used to fund affordable housing solutions such as increasing the supply of supportive and interim housing for people experiencing homelessness across the region. The 2020 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Point-in-Time count for SPA Eight is provided in Table 43, followed by Lomita’s point-in-time count results in Table 44.

Table 43: People Experiencing Homelessness in Service Planning Area Eight Population
All Persons
All Households
Sheltered Unsheltered Total
1,048
630
3,512
3,342
4,560
3,972
Household Composition
Adults 25+ (not in family 3,224
units)
377 3,601
Transitional Age Youth 18 to 26 77
24 (not in family units)
51 4 HRC (Harbor Regional Center). n.d. “Harbor Regional Center Demographics 2020.” https://www.harborrc.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/demographics_2020_0.pdf?1607463864.

Page | 30 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *572
Table 43: People Experiencing Homelessness in Service Planning Area Eight Population
Unaccompanied Minors
(Under 18) (not in family
units)
Family Households with at
Least 1 Child under 18
Sheltered Unsheltered Total
8 N/A
67 8
219 286
Veterans
Veterans Who Are
Individuals
Veterans in Families
199
—
220 419
1 1
Race/Ethnicity
American Indian/ Alaska 61
Native
2 63
Asian 6 55 61
Black/ African American
Hispanic/ Latino
Native Hawaiian/ Other
Pacific Islander
548
335
5 727
1,124
33 1,275
1,459
38 White
Multi-Racial/ Other
131
21 1,432
80 1,563
101
Age
124
68 Under 18
18 to 24
25 to 54
55 to 61
62 and Over
408
67 400
94 532
135
2,780
521
592
2,380
427
79 513
Sexual Orientation
Straight
Gay or Lesbian
Bisexual
Sexual Orientation NonConforming
917
7 8
3,365
37 98
4,282
44 106
116 12 128
Health and Disability (indicators are not mutually exclusive) Substance Use Disorder

HIV/AIDS
39 9
1,374
26 1,413
35 Serious Mental Illness
Developmental Disability
Physical Disability
113
68 96
703
223
883
816
291
979
Domestic/Intimate Partner Violence (DV/IPV)
DV/IPV Experience
Homeless Due to Fleeing
DV/IPV
98 23
1,074
333
1,172
356
Page | 31 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *573
Lomita’s population made up 0.2 percent of the region’s population in 2020, and Lomita’s proportion of the region’s share of those experiencing homelessness is much lower at 0.037 percent. This is likely due to Lomita’s lack of available rapid transit, major job centers, and key facilities that generally serve the needs of those experiencing homelessness. Due to the low availability of services for those experiencing homelessness in Lomita, it is likely that they were once either sheltered residents of Lomita’s population or possibly became stranded in Lomita.

Table 44: People Experiencing Homelessness by City and County (2020) Residents City of Lomita Los Angeles County
Sheltered
Unsheltered
Total
10 15
25 18,395
48,041
66,436
Sources:

LAHSA (Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority). 2021a. “2020 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count – Data Summary, Total Point-In-Time Homeless Population by Geographic Areas.” February 3, 2021. https://www.lahsa.org/ documents?id=4692-2020-greater-los-angeles-homeless-count-total-point-in-time-homeless-population-bygeographic-areas.

LAHSA. 2021b. “2020 Homeless Count by Community/City” [online database]. Accessed March 2021. https://www.lahsa.org/data?id=45-2020-homeless-count-by-community-city.https://www.lahsa.org/data?id=45-2020- homeless-count-by-community-city.

Los Angeles Almanac. 2021. “Homeless Counts – Los Angeles County, By City, 2020, 2019 & 2018.” Accessed March 2021. http://www.laalmanac.com/social/so14b.php.

Available Resources
As discussed above, homelessness is recognized as a region-wide issue where region-wide housing solutions are needed. The funding acquired by Measure H is already being used to implement housing developments throughout the Los Angeles region to better serve the needs of those experiencing homelessness. Solutions throughout the Los Angeles region will help assist the needs of those in Lomita, including the 15 unsheltered people, as well as those in need across all cities in the region.

A Continuum of Care is an integrated system of care that guides and tracks individuals and families experiencing homelessness through a comprehensive array of housing and services designed to prevent and end homelessness. HUD defined a Continuum of Care as a community plan to organize and deliver housing and services to meet the specific needs of people experiencing homelessness as they move to stable housing and maximize selfsufficiency. It includes action steps to end homelessness and prevent a return to homelessness. The continuum has four necessary parts: outreach, intake, and assessment; emergency shelter; transitional housing with supportive services; and permanent and permanent supportive housing with services if needed. Continuum of Care programs for people experiencing homelessness consist of a network of emergency and transitional shelters, as defined in Table 45. In addition, permanent supportive housing programs for persons previously experiencing homelessness are also major components of the region’s network of care. Table 46 lists the interim housing facilities for those experiencing homelessness within SPA Eight.

Page | 32 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *574
Table 45: Housing Option Definitions
Term Definition
Emergency Shelters Provides low-barrier, safe, and supportive 14-hour shelter, food, and comfort to those experiencing homelessness. Winter Emergency Shelters are seasonal Emergency Shelters that operate from December 1st to March 31st.

Transitional Housing
Supportive Housing
Crisis Housing
Provides longer-term shelter solutions through temporary housing options that can last up to 24 months and includes supportive services, such as case management.

Provides long-term housing with wraparound services that are meant to support the stability and health of individuals experiencing homelessness.

Provides a safe, low-barrier, housing-first, housing-focused, and supportive 24-hour residence to persons/households experiencing homelessness while they are being quickly assessed and connected to a broad range of housing resources. Crisis Housing programs must work in collaboration with LAHSA and the Coordinated Entry System (CES) in Los Angeles County. Crisis Housing should fit seamlessly with the other CES Program components
Bridge Housing Provides a safe, low-barrier, housing first, housing-focused, and supportive 24-hour residence to persons experiencing homelessness while they are working on locating, applying to, and obtaining their permanent housing. Bridge Housing prioritizes individuals experiencing homelessness based on the vulnerability level of the individual person, with the most vulnerable prioritized.

Prioritization factors include mental health conditions, physical disability, and length of homelessness. Bridge Housing programs must work in collaboration with LAHSA and the CES in Los Angeles County. Bridge housing should fit seamlessly with other CES Program components.

Homelessness
Prevention and Rapid
Re-Housing
Rapid re-housing reconnects families and individuals to a housing option as quickly as possible using housing vouchers and rental assistance. It is a more stable and cost-effective way to house people, but due to an overall shortage of housing, these options are often limited.

Table 46: Interim Housing Facilities for those Experiencing Homelessness within Service Planning Area Eight
Provider
Catholic Charities Inc.

Project Achieve
Type
Bridge Housing
Population Served
Single men and women ages
18 and older
Bed or Room Count
43 beds for men and 16 beds
for women
U.S. Veteran’s Initiative Inc. Crisis Housing Veterans (men, women, and families)
600 beds;
Bridge Housing
Transitional and Permanent
Housing
Rapid re-housing and
homelessness prevention
services for over 300
Rapid Re-Housing households
Harbor Interfaith – South
Bay Auxiliary
Doors of Hope Women’s
Shelter
Temporary Bridge Home
Shelter
Privately Funded –
Temporary/Day Out Shelter
Privately Funded –
Temporary/Day Out Shelter
Emergency shelter that
provides temporary housing
to women and children
experiencing violence/facing
homelessness due to
Families 100 beds
20 beds
22 beds
40 beds
Women
Beacon Light Mission Men
Rainbow House Women and children
domestic violence
Page | 33 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *575
Table 46: Interim Housing Facilities for those Experiencing Homelessness within Service Planning Area Eight
Provider
Women’s Shelter of Long
Beach
Type Population Served
Women and children
Bed or Room Count
Emergency Supportive 15 beds
Housing for victims of
domestic violence
Long Beach Rescue Mission
(Lydia House)
Long Beach Rescue Mission
(Samaritan House)
Transitional housing with
support services
Emergency Shelter
Women and children
Men
50 beds
140 beds
Community’s Child Transitional Housing Single mothers and infants Single-family home with accessory dwelling unit and
garage conversion
Source:

LAHSA (Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority). 2019. “LAHSA Interim Housing List.” Updated October 2019. https://www.lahsa.org/documents?id=2196-lahsa-shelter-list.pdf.

In addition to the resources detailed above to assist those experiencing homelessness, cities play an important role in connecting those experiencing homelessness with supportive services. Working with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, city staff, and the South Bay Cities Council of Governments, more innovative approaches are being identified to address homelessness, including identifying a strong network of churches and non-profit service providers (Harbor Interfaith Services, St. Margaret’s Center, PATH and others). Similar efforts are identifying resources available to assist extremely low-income households and those with special needs. One such program is Home Share South Bay, which leverages the internet to connect homeowners with individuals looking for an affordable room. Lomita has a population of 1,285 people who either have a self-care difficulty or an independent living difficulty. There is no available data to determine the proportion of these populations who have assistance from family and friends. Some of those with disabilities may qualify for available public and affordable housing (Table 47) or rental subsidies provided by the County of Los Angeles, as detailed in the programs below. Additionally, the estimated extremely lowincome housing need for the 6th Cycle Housing Element is 119 units.

Table 47 details the public and affordable housing developments in Lomita, including those restricted for Section 8 housing vouchers or restricted as affordable through other subsidies.

Table 47: Public and Affordable Housing
Site Number of Population Served Form of Assistance Earliest Expiration Assisted Units
301
of Affordability
Harbor Hills – 26607 Permanent
S. Western Ave.

Lomita 90717
Families and older adults County owned and
subsidized
Lomita Kiwanis
Gardens – 25109
Ebony Lane
67 Older adults HUD Section 202/811
Section 8
2027
Page | 34 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *576
Table 47: Public and Affordable Housing
Site Number of
Assisted Units
Population Served Form of Assistance Earliest Expiration of Affordability
Housing Assistance
Payment (HAP)
City owned and
subsidized
Lomita Manor 78 Older adults Permanent
Other resources to assist extremely low-income households and those with special needs include programs funded by the State’s Senate Bill 2 funding program. In 2017, the State of California approved Senate Bill 2, which created the Building Homes and Jobs Act and the Permanent Local Housing Allocation Grant program. The Permanent Local Housing Allocation program is the State’s first permanent source of funding for affordable housing, something cities have not had since the elimination of Redevelopment. Revenue is generated through recording fees on real estate transactions and, therefore, will vary from year to year depending on market activity. The methodology for the allocation of funds is based on population size, rates of poverty, and overcrowding. The County of Los Angeles Development Authority has allocated $140,481 to Lomita for the 2021–2022 program.

The City Council authorized County of Los Angeles staff to administer the total allocated funding of $140,481 from the Permanent Local Housing Allocation Grant on behalf of the City for the following eligible activities:
•
•
Capital and/or operating cost at Lomita Manor ($0 – $140,481) Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes/apartments ($0 – $140,481).

Further, programs of the Housing Element that are designed to assist those with special needs include the following:
•
•
•
Program 1: Housing Rehabilitation Grant – Through this program, five lower-income households will be assisted annually in the rehabilitation of single-family and mobile homes. Funding through this program can be used to assist with modifications to assist in accessibility upgrades.

Program 3: Mobile Home Park Regulations – This program will establish an ordinance to place additional protections for residents of mobile home parks, many of which qualify as extremely low-income households.

Program 6: Accessory Dwelling Units – Through this program, the City will further incentivize the production of accessory dwelling units. Accessory dwelling units can provide opportunities for those with special needs, such as older adults and those with disabilities, including developmental disabilities, by creating housing that is in an independent setting while still allowing for support from caregivers who reside on the same lot. • Program 9: Accessibility – This program will provide a website with resources related to accessibility, such as home retrofit guides and universal design options that can help better inform developers and residents of potential changes that can be made in housing to increase accessibility for those with limited abilities.

Page | 35 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *577
Preservation of At-Risk Housing
As shown in Table 47, the agreement for Lomita Kiwanis Gardens development assistance is set to expire in 2027. This Section 8 property is governed under a Housing Assistance Payment contract between HUD and the landlord. Housing Assistance Payment contracts generally last between 5 and 20 years, with the majority being 20-year contracts. This property has been identified as a low risk of expiration because the likeliness that the contract with HUD will be renewed is extremely high. According to HUD’s records, this property has been owned and maintained as an affordable housing development since 1985 by the Retirement Housing Foundation, a non-profit that has constructed and managed affordable housing properties since 1961. With a long history of partnering with public and private entities to build affordable housing, more than 1,500 affordable units across the state of California, and strong partnerships with religious institutions, RHF is qualified to maintain the affordability of Kiwanis Gardens, although they are not certified by HCD. Of those qualified entities, the closest one to Lomita is Alliance Property Group. Through Program 4 of the Housing Element, the City has committed to contacting qualified entities in the event that the owner decides to sell or dispose of the property. If the expiration of these units were to expire without renewal and they were to be replaced through the development of new affordable units, the projected cost of replacing the 67 units would be approximately $9 million, assuming a per-unit cost of approximately $135,000. The renewal of the contract between the non-profit and HUD is the most affordable and most likely strategy for preserving the affordability of the Lomita Kiwanis Gardens, especially given the Retirement Housing Federation’s status as an established non-profit, affordable housing developer, and property manager. Through Program 4, Lower Income Housing Preservation, of the Housing Element, the City is committed to contact and coordination with the Retirement Housing Foundation and qualified entities; providing technical assistance on the need to preserve the existing affordable housing stock and educating affected tenants on assistance; and to support potential funding sources to ensure the ongoing preservation of those units identified as at-risk. Further, through Program 5, Replacement Requirements, the City is committed to requiring the replacement of lower-income units converted to market-rate on a one-to-one basis.

Page | 36 Appendix B
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *578
Appendix C:

Constraints and
Zoning Analysis
Contents
Appendix C: Constraints and Zoning Analysis...................................................................................1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................3 Governmental Constraints...................................................................................................................3 Land Use and Zoning.......................................................................................................................3 Residential Uses by Zone.................................................................................................................4 Manufactured Housing....................................................................................................................5 Accessory Dwelling Units.................................................................................................................5 Facilities for People Experiencing Homelessness........................................................................6 Housing for People with Special Needs .......................................................................................9 Specific Plan.....................................................................................................................................12 Building Standards..............................................................................................................................13 Mixed Use Overlay Standards.......................................................................................................15 Parking Standards...........................................................................................................................17 Building Codes and Enforcement................................................................................................17 On-Site and Off-Site Improvements...........................................................................................19 Energy Conservation......................................................................................................................19 Permitting Processes and Fees.........................................................................................................19 Permit Processes and Timelines...................................................................................................20 Conditional Use Permits ................................................................................................................21 Site Plan Review ..............................................................................................................................22 Variances ..........................................................................................................................................22 Page | 1 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *579
Zone Change...................................................................................................................................23 Height Variation Permit .................................................................................................................23 Subdivisions......................................................................................................................................23 Fees and Exactions..........................................................................................................................24 Locally Adopted Ordinances ........................................................................................................27 Non-Governmental Constraints .......................................................................................................27 Market Constraints..............................................................................................................................27 Construction Financing..................................................................................................................28 Mortgage Financing.......................................................................................................................28 Land and Construction Costs .......................................................................................................29 Environmental Constraints.................................................................................................................30 Water Supply ...................................................................................................................................30 Seismic Concerns............................................................................................................................31 Geological Hazards.........................................................................................................................31 Flooding............................................................................................................................................31 Infrastructure Capacity .......................................................................................................................31 Water.................................................................................................................................................31 Sewers...............................................................................................................................................33 Stormwater.......................................................................................................................................33 Analysis of Local Efforts to Remove Constraints ...........................................................................33 Quantified Objectives.........................................................................................................................34 Tables
1 Residential General Plan Land Uses.............................................................................................. 4 Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types ....................................................................................... 4 Development Standards for Zones that Permit Residential Uses........................................14 Development Standards for the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone...................................................16 Parking Standards by Residential Use.........................................................................................17 Permitting Fees ................................................................................................................................24 Planning Commission / City Council Application Fees..........................................................25 Disposition of Home Loans (2019)..............................................................................................28 Summary of Quantifiable Objectives .........................................................................................34 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Page | 2 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *580
Introduction
There are many factors that may affect the type, timing, and cost of housing development, maintenance, and improvement. Both governmental and non-governmental factors can act as barriers to the development of housing. The City of Lomita (City) can exercise some control to alleviate some of these barriers through regulatory changes and process improvements. The constraints detailed below include those governmental constraints related to local land use and zoning regulations, code enforcement, required on-site and off-site improvements, development permit processes, fees and exactions, and other local regulations. In addition, an analysis of non-governmental constraints related to the availability of financing, land costs, and construction costs, as well as a detailed overview of the existing infrastructural and environmental constraints to development, are provided. Further, an analysis of local efforts to remove constraints to the development of housing is included.

Ongoing and new programs aimed to facilitate development and further remove constraints are detailed in the policy and program portion of the Housing Element.

Governmental Constraints
Land Use and Zoning
State law requires that each city have a General Plan that establishes policy guidelines for future development. The City of Lomita General Plan was adopted in 1998 and consists of an integrated and internally consistent set of policies and implementing programs. The General Plan Land Use Element sets forth land use designations to guide the location, type, and intensity or density of permitted uses of land in Lomita. The City of Lomita Zoning Ordinance implements the Land Use Element of the General Plan by providing specific direction and development standards within each of the land use categories. These land use controls can facilitate or limit certain types of development.

The Housing Element includes a list of goals, policies, and programs that are internally consistent with the General Plan. The Housing Element most specifically addresses the policies of the General Plan Land Use Element since it is the Land Use Element that designates the location and extent of residential development throughout Lomita. The following goals of the General Plan Land Use Element outline the vision for the City, consistent with the goals, policies, and programs identified in the Housing Element:

1. To promote an orderly pattern of development in the City

2. To provide for a variety of housing opportunities

3. To promote the development of a wide range of commercial activities Page | 3 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *581

4. To ensure a strong employment and commercial base to finance public improvements and services

5. To provide adequate public services and facilities
As shown in Table 1, the Land Use Element describes five land uses that permit residential uses, including a Mixed-Use designation that acts as an overlay in a portion of some commercially zoned sites.

Table 1: Residential General Plan Land Uses
Land Use Designation
Agriculture
Acres Description
Areas that are lower density in character and where the keeping of animals is permitted. The allowable density is up to 8.7 dwelling units per acre.

90.9 Areas that are developed with single-family homes. The allowable density is 5.8 to 8.7 dwelling units per acre.

Areas that are developed with multifamily residential uses and mobile homes. The allowable density is 8.72 to 19.8 dwelling units per acre.

Low Density Residential 506.3
Medium Density Residential 60.1
Areas that are developed with multifamily residential uses and mobile homes. The allowable density is 19.8 to 43.6 dwelling units per acre. Specific Plan approval has allowed up to 88 dwelling units per acre.

High Density Residential 45.3
Horizontal and vertical mixed-use housing types at a
maximum density of 22 units per acre.
—
Mixed Use
Total

58.5 761.1
Residential Uses by Zone
The City’s zoning regulations accommodate a diversity of housing types to meet the varying needs of residents at all economic segments. This includes housing to meet the special needs of older adults, persons with disabilities, farmworkers, and those experiencing homelessness.

Table 2 details the residential housing types permitted under each zoning designation.

Table 2: Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types
Residential Use Agriculture
(A-1)
Single-Family
Residential
(R-1)
Residential
Variable Density
(RVD)
Mixed Use
Overlay
Light
Manufacturing and
Commercial (MC)1(MUO)1
Accessory Dwelling Units
Community Care Facilities
(six or fewer people)
P P
P
P
P P
Community Care Facilities
(7 to 15 people)
Emergency Shelters
Home Occupations
(live/work)
C C
P
C
P
P P B
Page | 4 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *582
Table 2: Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types
Residential Use Agriculture
(A-1)
Single-Family
Residential
(R-1)
Residential
Variable Density
(RVD)
Mixed Use
Overlay
Light
Manufacturing and
Commercial (MC)1(MUO)1
Manufactured Homes
Multifamily Housing2
Rooming House
P P P
P2
P
C
Senior Citizen Planned Unit
Developments
Single-Family Residence
Single-Room Occupancy
Supportive Housing
C

P P P C
C
P
P
P
P
P2
P2 Transitional housing
P = Permitted; C= Conditional Use Permit; B = City-approved Business License, Home Occupation Permit, and approval by the Community Development Director are required. (1) Any uses where new buildings, structures or additions are proposed; the location of said buildings, structures and additions shall be to the satisfaction of the planning commission. (2) Additions and new buildings requiring additional parking must receive “Site Plan” approval pursuant to this title.

Manufactured Housing
Manufactured housing or factory-built housing on a permanent foundation are permitted in zones where single-family homes are permitted (A-1, R-1, RVD, CPD). No discretionary permit is required for manufactured housing.

Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior ADUs are permitted in agricultural, single-family, and multifamily residential zones, subject to the review and approval by the City’s community development director. The City updated its Zoning Code to comply with State requirements in 2018, but State law was further amended in 2019. Consistent with State law, the current Zoning Code allows ADUs to have a maximum size of 1,200 square feet, parking is not required, and the square footage is not calculated as part of the site’s total floor area ratio.

Additionally, the conversion of space in an existing structure to an ADU is permitted, as well as newly constructed ADUs that are attached to the primary dwelling. However, updates to meet the following State requirements are needed: one ADU and one junior ADU are permitted on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family structure; ADUs are permitted in any zone that permits single-family or multifamily residential uses; and where on-site parking is lost for the construction of an ADU, that parking cannot be required to be replaced. While an amendment to the City’s Zoning Code is needed to address State requirements, the City currently permits ADUs consistent with State regulations. Program 6, Accessory Dwelling Units, of the Housing Element will ensure that the City’s Zoning Code is made consistent with the requirements of State law as they relate to ADUs.

Page | 5 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *583
Facilities for People Experiencing Homelessness
Transitional Housing
Transitional housing facilities are defined under State law as buildings configured as rental housing developments that are operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculating of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that is no less than 6 months from the beginning of the assistance. They offer temporary residential accommodations for those experiencing homelessness or families transitioning to permanent housing. Transitional housing often includes a supportive services component, such as job skills training or rehabilitation counseling, to allow individuals to gain the necessary life skills to support independent living. In accordance with State law (Assembly Bill 139, 2019), transitional housing must be considered a residential use of property and is subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone.

Transitional housing is a permitted use in agricultural and single-family zones, and may require Site Plan approval in multifamily zones when additions and new buildings require additional parking. Consistent with State requirements, in the City, transitional housing is only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone in A-1, R-1, and Mixed-Use Overlay (MUO) zones, but in the Residential Variable Density (RVD) zone, transitional housing is subject to a Site Plan approval, whereas singlefamily housing is permitted in the RVD without being subject to a Site Plan approval.

Therefore, Program 13 of the Housing Element will remove the discretionary requirement for transitional housing in the RVD zone.

Supportive Housing
Supportive housing is defined as housing with no limit on length of stay that is occupied by the target population and that is linked to on-site or off-site services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving their health status, and maximizing their ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. The target population for supportive housing is individuals or families that are experiencing homelessness. Permanent supportive housing may provide mental health support and counseling, as well as other services needed to support families and individuals with independent living. In accordance with State law, in the City, supportive housing is a use by right in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses.

Supportive housing is permitted, without a discretionary permit, in the A-1 and R-1 zones.

Supportive housing is a permitted use in the RVD zone, but new buildings that require additional parking require Site Plan approval. Program 9 of the Housing Element will allow supportive housing by-right in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses, in accordance with Assembly Bill 2162 (2018).

Page | 6 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *584
Low-Barrier Navigation Centers
In accordance with Section 65662 of the California Government Code, a Low-Barrier Navigation Center is a housing first, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing. “Low barrier” means best practices to reduce barriers to entry.

Emergency shelters can qualify as Low Barrier Navigation Centers. The development of these uses must be permitted by-right in areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential zones permitting multifamily residential uses so long as it offers services to connect people to permanent housing through a services plan that identifies services staffing; it is linked to a coordinated entry system; it complies with Chapter 6.5 of Division 8 of the Welfare and Institutions Code; and it has a system for entering information regarding client stays, demographics, income, and exit destination through the local Homeless Management Information System. The focus of Low-Barrier Navigation Centers is to move people into permanent housing. The City’s Zoning Code does not define Low-Barrier Navigation Centers as a use; therefore, Program 8, Low Barrier Navigation Centers, will amend the Zoning Code to permit the development of Low-Barrier Navigation Centers as a use by-right in mixed-use and non-residential zones that permit residential uses, in accordance with State law.

Single-Room Occupancies
Single-room occupancies provide residential facilities where individual, secure rooms are rented to a one- or two-person household. Rooms are generally 150 to 375 square feet and include a sink, closet, and toilet, with shower and kitchen facilities typically shared. Singleroom-occupancy units are rented on a weekly or monthly basis. Single-room occupancies are permitted within the MUO zone with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Conditions for approval relate only to the performance of the facility, such as parking, management, and required unit amenities, as follows:
• Management. A single-room occupancy management plan shall be submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the Community Development Director. The management plan shall be comprehensive and contain management policies and operations, rental procedures and rates, maintenance plans, residency and guest rules and procedures, security procedures, and staffing needs, including job descriptions. A 24-hour resident manager shall be provided for any single-room occupancy use with five (5) or more units. •
•
Off-street parking must be provided at a rate of one (1) parking space per two (2) units, inclusive of guest parking.

The building shall contain a minimum of two hundred fifty (250) square feet of common space such as recreation areas, lounges, and living spaces. An additional ten (10) square feet of common space is required per rooming unit over eleven (11). Bathrooms, laundries, hallways, the main lobby, vending areas, and kitchens shall not be counted as common space.

Page | 7 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *585
•
•
Garbage receptacles are to be provided by the property owner. Garbage receptacles must be located on the lot or property in a manner that does not hinder access to any required offstreet parking or loading spaces.

Each unit shall be provided a kitchen sink with a garbage disposal, serviced with hot and cold water, and a countertop measuring a minimum of eighteen (18) inches wide by twenty-four (24) inches deep. If each individual unit is not provided with a minimum of a refrigerator and a microwave oven, a complete kitchen facility available for residents shall be provided on each floor of the structure.
• For each unit a private toilet in an enclosed compartment with a door shall be provided. This compartment shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) square feet. If private bathing facilities are not provided for each unit, shared shower or bathtub facilities shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) for every five (5) units or fraction thereof. The shared shower or bathtub facility shall be on the same floor as the units it is intended to serve and shall be accessible from a common area or hallway. Each shared shower or bathtub facility shall be provided with an interior lockable door.

Emergency Shelters
Emergency shelters are a permitted use, not subject to a discretionary permit, in the M-C zone. While the use itself does not require a discretionary action, for any use within the M-C zone where new buildings, structures, or additions are proposed, the proposal is subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission. This discretionary requirement associated with new structures poses a constraint to the development of Emergency Shelters, and Program 13 of the Housing Element will remove this discretionary requirement so that Emergency Shelters are permitted by-right, in accordance with State law.

Lomita has sufficient capacity to accommodate the need for emergency shelters in the M-C zone. The sites zoned as M-C total approximately 15 acres, located along the south side of Lomita Boulevard between Narbonne Avenue and Walnut Avenue, and on the west side of the City along Crenshaw Boulevard.

The City has a total of 25 people experiencing homelessness according to the 2020 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count; of the 25 people experiencing homelessness, 15 are unsheltered. Considering a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet development standard, and a minimum of 220 square feet per unit, which is the minimum unit size permitted by the California Building Code, the City can accommodate 198 dwelling units per acre. As such, the 15 acres of M-C zoned parcels in the City can approximately accommodate 2,970 dwelling units of emergency shelter units, which would exceed the City’s current need to house its 15- person unsheltered homeless population.

Employee and Farmworker Housing
Farmworkers are considered a special housing group because of the seasonal nature of their work and the low wages for these employees. Farmworkers include employees of nurseries, stables, and agricultural and livestock operations. Farmworkers generally have limited and seasonal incomes, which presents a need for affordable housing near their places of work on Page | 8 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *586
a seasonal basis, rather than year-round. As further detailed in Appendix B, Housing Needs Assessment, there are no farmworker occupations in Lomita; however, 39 Lomita residents are employed within the agriculture industry. It is likely that these residents were employed in occupations associated with landscaping nurseries, landscaping services, stables, gardens, and equestrian centers in the Palos Verdes Peninsula.

Employee housing is housing provided for six or fewer agricultural workers in accordance with the California Health and Safety Code Employee Housing Act (EHA). The EHA requires that any employee housing providing accommodations for six or fewer employees be treated as a single-family structure. This mandates that employee housing not be required to apply for any additional permit or process that would not be required of a single-family residential structure in the same zone. Employee housing providing accommodations for six or fewer employees must be permitted by the same process by which single-family residences are permitted in the same zones. Further, farmworker housing must be permitted consistent with the EHA (Health and Safety Code Sections 17020–17027), and may only be subject to objective, quantifiable, written development standards, conditions, and policies that are consistent with the EHA. This includes the provision of employee housing consisting of bunkhouses of 36 beds or 12 units to be permitted in all zones that allow agricultural uses in the same manner as other agricultural uses. Program 13 will ensure that the City’s Zoning Code permits employee housing and farmworker housing in accordance with State laws as they relate to employee and farmworker housing.

Housing for People with Special Needs
Definition of “Family”
Local governments may restrict access to housing for households failing to qualify as “family” by the definition specified in the Zoning Code. Specifically, a restrictive definition of “family” that limits the number of and differentiates between related and unrelated individuals living together may illegally limit the development and siting of group homes for persons with disabilities but not for housing families that are similarly sized or situated. In December 2006, the City amended its Zoning Code to remove the definition of “family.” Reasonable Accommodation
The City is required by the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to provide a process for reasonable accommodation requests. The City’s Municipal Code establishes a process for persons with a disability to request a reasonable accommodation in the application of the City’s zoning laws where necessary to afford the individual an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling within Lomita.

The Community Development Department provides the completed application form and the application fee for reasonable accommodation requests. The Community Development Department Director considers the application for a minor reasonable accommodation and issues a written determination within 30 days of the date of receipt of a completed Page | 9 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *587
application and may either grant the accommodation request with or without nondiscriminatory conditions of approval; may deny the request; or may refer the matter to the Planning Commission, which will render a decision on the application in the same manner. If the application is for a major reasonable accommodation, the Planning Commission considers the application in the same manner as described above. The request is required to be approved if the specified findings are met. Program 13 of the Housing Element includes a commitment to remove the major reasonable accommodation process to simplify the procedure and increase housing opportunity for persons with disabilities.

The director of community development, planning commission or city council shall approve the request for a reasonable accommodation subject to the following findings:
• The housing, which is the subject of the request for reasonable accommodation, will be occupied as the primary residence by an individual protected under the fair housing laws.
• The request for reasonable accommodation is necessary to make specific housing available to one or more individuals protected under the fair housing laws. • The requested reasonable accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the city.
• The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration of the zoning or building laws, policies and/or procedures of the city. • The reasonable accommodation shall be subject to any reasonable conditions imposed on the approval that are consistent with the purposes of these findings. • That the reasonable accommodation shall only be applicable to the particular individual(s) or property.

The findings associated with the reasonable accommodations procedures are consistent with fair housing laws, consistent with model ordinances on reasonable accommodations provided by the State. Additionally, through Program 13 the decision process will be clarified to identify when a minor reasonable accommodations application is deferred to the Planning Commission by the Director of Community Development. Further, the minor accommodation process provides a process by which a reasonable accommodation can be processed without a hearing, not subject to the discretion of the Planning Commission or the aforementioned findings and therefore does not pose a constraint, as it provides options for facilitating the process. As part of the programs to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing and to increase housing opportunities for persons with disabilities, Program 13 commits to removing the major Reasonable Accommodation Process. Additionally, the Planning Commission hearing cam potentially pose a constraint to obtaining Reasonable Accommodation and may need to be removed or otherwise mitigated. Program 13 includes a commitment to analyze the Planning Commission as a constraint.

Page | 10 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *588
Residential Care Facilities
Community care facilities are defined as any facility, place, or building that is maintained and operated to provide nonmedical residential care, day treatment, adult daycare, or foster family agency services for children, adults, or children and adults, including, but not limited to, people with physical disabilities, mentally impaired, incompetent persons, and abused or neglected children, and includes residential facilities, adult day programs, therapeutic day service facilities, foster family agencies, foster family homes, small family homes, social rehabilitation facilities, and community treatment facilities.

The City permits community care and childcare facilities with six or fewer persons by right in agricultural, single-family residential, and multifamily residential zones, and the uses are permitted as standard residential uses in all residential zones. Community care and childcare facilities with seven to 15 persons are permitted with a CUP in agricultural, single-family residential, and multifamily residential zones. As further detailed in the Permitting Processes and Fees section, below, a project requiring a CUP takes about 2 to 4 months in processing time, adding between 2 to 4 weeks to the permitting process compared to projects that do not require a CUP.

The Planning Commission may approve a CUP, but first a determination must be made that approval of the CUP meets the required findings. The findings for a CUP are outlined below and are also detailed in the Permitting Processes and Fees section of this document, below. • The proposed use is allowed within the district with approval of a CUP and complies with all other applicable requirements, as follows:
o
o
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.

The design, location, size, and operating characteristics are compatible with existing and future land uses and buildings and structures in the vicinity, and the proposed use will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety, or general welfare or be materially detrimental to the property of other persons located in the vicinity.
o
o
The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this chapter, or as required as a condition in order to integrate the use with the uses in the neighborhood.

The site is served by highways and streets adequate to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate.

Requirements for discretionary permits may pose constraints to development. For example, Residential Care Facilities provide in-house treatment or rehabilitation programs on a 24- hour basis. These include drug and alcohol rehabilitation and recovery facilities. These facilities require a CUP in residential zones, as they are often a source of fear and concern for community members. The Planning Commission will only deny a CUP if the required findings cannot be met. Program 13 of the Housing Element includes an objective to amend the Page | 11 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *589
Zoning Code to permit large Residential Care Facilities in commercial and mixed-use zones without discretion.

Senior Citizen Planned Unit Developments
“Senior citizen planned unit developments” are permitted in the Residential Variable Density zone subject to a CUP. Senior citizen planned unit developments are subject to the same development standards as multifamily housing developments that include minimum unit sizes, parking requirements, open space requirements, laundry facilities, trash areas, street width specifications, a sewer study, and a water study. Additional requirements for senior citizen planned unit developments include the following:
•
•
•
Occupancy by residents as defined in Section 51.3 of the California Civil Code Elevators for structures over one story in height
Laundry facilities must be provided in each unit
The Planning Commission may approve a reduction in parking spaces pursuant to a completed parking study if the following findings are met:
• The intent of the parking regulations, in compliance with all other applicable provisions of this chapter, is met; and
• Sufficient parking would be provided to serve the use intended and potential future uses of the subject parcel.

The parking study allows the applicant to provide evidence that the project-specific parking need is less than the parking regulations require. Parking would be evaluated based on a demonstrated need for the target population and the specific site in context to the surrounding location.

Program 13 will amend the Zoning Code to reduce development standards through reduced parking requirements and minimum unit size requirements. Additionally, the 6th Cycle Housing Element’s Program 27, Reduced Parking Requirements, will amend the Zoning Code to identify a process by which parking requirement can be reduced for religious institutions in exchange for housing development. The City will also conduct a parking study in walkable areas to inform parking requirement reductions.

Specific Plan
The 24000 Crenshaw Boulevard Specific Plan was adopted by the City in 2017, and applies to the 2.5 net acre property located at 24000 Crenshaw Boulevard on the northwest side of Lomita. The site is generally bound by Crenshaw Boulevard to the west and Lomita Boulevard to the south. The site permits multifamily residential uses as well as amenities such as a leasing office, pool, community room, roof deck, and fitness center. The Specific Plan planning area permits residential densities up to 88 units per acre at heights up to 64 feet tall.

Page | 12 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *590
Development of the Crenshaw site is currently underway. The site is entitled to build a fourstory multifamily development, which is under construction. This development will produce 220 new units, which are anticipated to be completed during the beginning of the 6th Cycle Housing Element. With the site zoned for 88 dwelling units per acre and the 220 units being developed on the 2.5-acre site, this development is achieving 100 percent of the density permitted under the zone.

The 24000 Crenshaw Boulevard Specific Plan permits the highest residential densities in Lomita, where the urbanized nature of the surrounding area provides adequate facilities and services for sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, and energy. As limited in size and intensity of use by the 24000 Crenshaw Boulevard Specific Plan, the 24000 Crenshaw Boulevard Specific Plan area will not require the development of additional sewage, water, solid waste disposal, energy, or other essential facilities.

Building Standards
Development Standards
Each zone that permits residential uses regulates the residential use permitted, lot size, density, and parking requirements. While regulations such as setbacks, lot size, and lot coverage can contribute to the number of dwelling units that can be developed on a lot, residential densities are primarily limited by established maximum densities. Table 3 describes all zones where residential uses are permitted in Lomita and their respective development standards.

Page | 13 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *591
Table 3: Development Standards for Zones that Permit Residential Uses Zone Minimum Lot
Area (square
feet)
Maximum
Density (units
per acre)
Minimum Lot
Width (feet)
Maximum
Floor Area
Ratio
Front
Yard
Side Yard Rear Yard Maximum
Setback (feet) Setback (feet) Height (feet)
Setback
(feet)
A-1 – Agriculture
R-1 – Single-Family
Residential
5,000
5,000

8.7 8.7
50 0.6 20 5 20
20 27
50 0.6 20 5 27
RVD – 1000 1,000
1,452
1,500
2,200
2,500
5,000
2,000

43.6 30
29 19.8

17.4 8.7
Residential
Variable
Density
1452
1500
2200
2500
5000
50 N/A
N/A
20 15
5 5
20 15
27 Senior Planned Unit 27
Developments

N/A N/A
(Conditionally Permitted in
RVD)
Commercial Planned
Development
10,000 8.7 75 0.6 20 5 20 27
(Permits uses permitted in
Single-Family Zones)
Page | 14 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *592
Mixed Use Overlay Standards
In addition to the zones detailed in Table 3, the City has a Mixed-Use Overlay (MUO) zone that permits residential uses when they are combined with nonresidential uses on the same project site, either vertically or horizontally. Mixed-use developments are required to feature structural separations between the residential and nonresidential spaces to allow the two uses to be rented, leased, sold, or occupied separately. Development within the MUO is subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. For any uses where new buildings, structures, or additions are proposed, the location of said buildings, structures, and additions shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. Minor additions that do not require additional parking are exempt from this requirement. As detailed in Table 4, the MUO permits a maximum density of 22 dwelling units per acre with no minimum density. The MUO permits standalone commercial and requires a minimum of 30 percent of the total square footage to be used for nonresidential uses unless a deviation is requested and approved through a CUP process. All projects in the MUO to date have been allowed to deviate from the nonresidential use standard. No standalone commercial project has been approved for over 30 years. Further, the maximum building height is 35 feet, but additional height can be approved through a CUP process. The development standards of the MUO do not pose a constraint to achieving 22 dwelling units per acre. Parking is allowed to be either covered or uncovered. Minimum lot area requirements are only applicable in the event that a lot is proposed to be split and are in place to ensure that a lot split does not pose a constraint to future development that would render land within Lomita undevelopable as a result of a lot split. Setbacks are not applied, unless the building is taller than 16 feet, in which case side and rear setbacks are 10 feet, which is minimal and consistent with mixed use setbacks in larger cities in pedestrian-oriented zones. As there is no front setback, this does not pose a constraint to development and facilitates a strong pedestrian realm. The maximum floor area ratio is also permissive for achieving 22 dwelling units per acre with up to 30-percent commercial. For example, on a 0.25-acre lot with a 2.0 FAR, a developer would be able to build 21,760 total square feet. If 30-percent were dedicated to commercial and the unit size was 500 square feet, the development would be able to achieve 30 dwelling units, far above the permitted du/ac in the MUO. Further, even if half of the lot were dedicated to parking, 22 total dwelling units would still be achievable at 3 stories, which on a 0.25 acre lot would again be well over the permitted 22 du/ac.

Residential development projects with multi-stories can vary in height as one-story ranges from 10 – 15 feet and upper stories are typically 10 – 12 feet; as such, a 35 feet height limit is feasible for a- 3-story building. All development applications proposing a 3-story building have been within the 35-feet height limit. Recent examples of developments in the MUO that achieved three-stories include 24813 Narbonne Avenue, 25002 Medawar Way, 24516 Narbonne Avenue, and 25114 Narbonne Avenue (See Appendix E Table 1 for more detail).

As further detailed in the Permitting Processes and Fees section, below, a project requiring a CUP takes about 2 to 4 months in processing time, adding 2 to 4 weeks to the permitting Page | 15 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *593
process compared to projects that do not require a CUP. The Planning Commission reviews the CUP to ensure the design, location, size, and operating characteristics are compatible with existing and future land among other findings (refer to Conditional Use Permit section).

As detailed in Program 14 of the Housing Element, the MUO will be amended to permit a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, establishing a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and allowing standalone residential, removing the minimum nonresidential requirement. Additionally, as detailed in Program 11 of the Housing Element, the City will pair the rezone (Program 14) with the creation of new objective development standards, which will ensure that these densities can feasibly be achieved. This will include an analysis of building height, setbacks, and FAR to ensure that 30 dwelling units per acre can be achieved on all sites in the MUO. Further, as identified in Program 7, the City will pair the rezone with objective development standards and technical assistance, making the State Density Bonus program more attractive to developers.

Table 4: Development Standards for the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Minimum Lot Area (square feet)
Maximum Density (units per acre)
Maximum Floor Area Ratio
Minimum Unit Size
10,000
22 2.0
500 square feet (studio)
Front Yard Setback N/A
Side Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
Maximum Building Height
Nonresidential Requirement
None unless the building exceeds 16 feet, then 10-foot setback None unless the building exceeds 16 feet, then 10-foot setback 35 feet or higher with CUP
30% of total square footage shall be for nonresidential uses In order to facilitate the development of mixed-use affordable housing within the MUO zone, the City offers the following incentives in exchange for lot consolidation (Lomita Density Bonus Ordinance 5.2):
• For mixed use projects involving lot consolidation, the commercial requirement in the MixedUse Overlay District is reduced to 20% (instead of 30%). • For mixed use projects involving lot consolidation of at least two parcels for a minimum 20,000 square feet, the commercial requirement is reduced to 10% (instead of 30%).

These reductions in commercial requirements are intended to encourage lot consolidation, and if utilized, can result in projects with more residential units considered through a density bonus. Program 12, Lot Consolidation, will further incentivize lot consolidation, as the City will amend the Zoning Code to enhance lot consolidation incentives.

As further detailed in the Permitting Processes and Fees section, below, a project requiring a CUP takes about 2 to 4 months in processing time, adding 2 to 4 weeks to the permitting process compared to projects that do not require a CUP.

Page | 16 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *594
Parking Standards
Lomita’s residential parking standards require a minimum of two garage spaces for all housing types with one to three bedrooms, and three garage spaces for larger single-family homes. Multifamily housing requires similar parking ratios, with the addition of required guest parking (see Table 5). Parking is often cited as a costly component of development, and when minimum parking requirements are regulated for uses Citywide, they leave little room for flexibility in development. While parking requirements are costly, the requirement to provide garage parking or enclosed parking for multifamily units is more costly and is difficult for developers to achieve and is therefore a constraint to multifamily development. Parking strategies that allow a market-driven approach can reduce the cost of development, increase development flexibility, and reduce costs for consumers while still providing developers with the freedom to provide parking as supported by the market. Program 27 will amend the Zoning Code to identify a process by which parking requirements can be reduced for religious institutions and will implement parking reductions for multifamily housing, including reductions of covered parking requirements. Additionally, through Program 27, the City will remove garage parking requirements for all residential zones.

Table 5: Parking Standards by Residential Use
Accessory Dwelling Units
Single-Family Detached
No parking required.

Two parking spaces in a garage, and one uncovered parking space for four bedrooms and/or dens, and one additional uncovered parking space for five or more bedrooms and/or dens.

Duplex, Apartment House,
Condominiums
Two parking spaces in a garage for each unit of up to four bedrooms and/or dens; three spaces in a garage for five or more bedrooms and/or dens, except as noted below. In addition, one guest parking space shall be required for each two units.

Said spaces shall not be located in the required front setback areas.

Large Family and Adult Care Homes
for not more than 7 to 12
Children/Adults Providing 24 HourPer-Day Care
One unenclosed parking space in addition to the required for the residence, plus one space for each vehicle used directly in conducting of such use but not to exceed two such vehicles. Tandem parking for the vehicles used in conducting the use is allowed.

Mixed Use – Residential Portion One parking space for each unit that is between 500 and 700 square feet in size.

Two parking spaces for each unit that is greater than 700 square feet in size. Guest parking is provided at a ratio of 0.25 parking spaces per unit.

Emergency Shelters One parking space for every five adult beds, plus one parking space per employee on the largest shift is required.

Senior Citizen Planned Unit
Developments
Two enclosed parking spaces per unit and one guest parking space per every two units. Tandem parking may be permitted.

Single Room Occupancy One parking space per two units is required.

Building Codes and Enforcement
The City of Lomita implements the 2019 edition of the California Building Code and other model construction codes and amendments adopted by the California Building Standards Commission. The codes used by the City are adopted in its Municipal Code by reference to Page | 17 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *595
the County of Los Angeles (County) codes through Ordinance No. 806U adopted on December 17, 2019. The County adopted the 2019 California Building Standards Code, which includes the 2019 Building Code, 2019 Electrical Code, 2019 Plumbing Code, 2019 Mechanical Code, 2019 Residential Code, 2019 Green Building Standards Code, and the 2019 Existing Building Code. The 2019 California Building Standards Code establishes standards and requires inspections at various stages of construction to ensure code compliance.

County modifications to the California Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code, Existing Building Code, Residential Code, and Green Building Standards Code are reasonably necessary because of local climatic and geological conditions. The local climate is characterized by hot, dry summers, often resulting in drought conditions, followed by strong Santa Ana winds, often resulting in hazardous fire conditions, and heavy winter rains, often resulting in expansive soil conditions. Relevant examples of local amendments to the California Building Code adopted by the County include the following: the restriction of wood shingles and wood shakes as roof coverings in any Fire Hazard Severity Zones; additional requirements for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F, wood diaphragms supporting concrete or masonry walls; special inspections are not required for detached one- or two-family dwellings not exceeding two stories above grade plan, provided the structure is not assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F and does not have horizontal or vertical irregularities; permanent wood foundation systems and prescriptive design of foundation walls shall not be used for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F; and retaining walls assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F shall not be partially or wholly constructed of wood. Additionally, the County has further amended the California Building Code to extend the amount of time before a permit that is issued by the Building Official will expire from 180 days to 12 months from the date of permit issuance, increasing flexibility as outlined in the Building Code requirement. Other modifications are administrative in nature and are necessary to allow the uniform application of the codes.

The California Building Standards Code also requires new residential construction to comply with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Although these standards and the time required for inspections increase housing production costs and may impact the viability of rehabilitation of older properties that are required to be brought up to current code standards, the intent of the codes is to provide structurally sound, safe, and energy-efficient housing. Most building and zoning enforcement activities of the City are in response to complaints by Lomita residents, and violations involving structural features are not as common as Zoning Code violations. The Code Enforcement Division and the Community Development Department of the City continues to provide information on rehabilitation assistance to potentially eligible households. The codes serve to protect residents from hazards and risks, and are considered to be necessary constraints to housing production.

Page | 18 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *596
On-Site and Off-Site Improvements
The City owns its sanitary sewer collection system and contracts with the Los Angeles County Sanitation District for maintenance. Requirements for on- and off-site improvements vary depending on the presence of existing improvements, as well as the size and nature of the proposed development. In general, most residential areas in Lomita are served with infrastructure. For the construction of any building, addition, or improvement where the cost exceeds $35,000, the Zoning Code requires a number of improvements, including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving, and drainage structures. Private street widths must be wide enough to meet the standards established by the Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements. The City uses the standards and codes adopted by the County of Los Angeles.

Other requirements for residential development include a water study for projects with five or more units to demonstrate the project impact on local water availability and fire flow. Sewer studies are required for projects with five or more units to identify local impact on capacity.

Sewer impact studies may cost between $4,000 and $6,000 depending on the complexity of the project. Upgrades for water and sewer connections may be required to correct deficiencies where they are identified. While this is a burden on developers, the studies are vital to safeguard the public’s quality of life and ensure sewer services are provided to existing and new customers in accordance with State law. Lomita is currently updating its Water Master Plan. As a result of the Water Master Plan update, a water study may not be required, depending on whether the proposed development is located within an area that is studied for deficiencies.

Energy Conservation
The City promotes energy conservation through enforcement of the State’s Green Building Standards and through its Citywide newsletters where resources related to conservation are shared via email and mailers. Additionally, in all residential zones, the City allows solar collectors and solar energy systems to exceed height limits and setback requirements mandated by the regulations to the minimum extent necessary for their safe and efficient operation in accordance with the California Building Code and other applicable provisions of State law. Where feasible, ancillary solar equipment is required to be located inside a building or screened from public view. Solar collectors and solar energy systems require written approval by the Director of Community Development or the designee of that individual to ensure compliance with the regulations. Through Program 25, Energy Conservation Program, the City will review zoning and subdivision requirements to promote energy conservation measures and promote energy conservation strategies on the City’s website and newsletter.

Permitting Processes and Fees
Permit processing fees, development impact fees, and construction taxes can increase the cost of housing development in Lomita. While City fees and taxes offset the cost of Page | 19 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *597
development, they could serve to constrain housing production, especially production of affordable units.

Local processing and permit procedures can also constrain the development of housing through unnecessary discretionary permit requirements, lengthy permit processing timelines, and subjective requirements that leave uncertainties in the overall development design and density. Discretionary actions can be required for use permits, zone or plan amendments, and subdivisions, whereas ministerial, or by-right, permits involve application of objective standards and criteria.

Further, in accordance with Section 65913.4 of the California Government Code, also known as Senate Bill (SB) 35, a permit applicant may submit an application for a development that is subject to the streamlined, ministerial approval process and is not subject to a CUP if they meet the objective planning standards as outlined in the government code and as summarized as follows:
•
•
Multifamily housing developments on infill sites zoned for residential or residential mixed-use.

A minimum of 10 percent of the units are dedicated as affordable to households earning 80 percent or less of the area median income.
• For developments with 10 or more units, a prevailing wage requirement is included in all contracts for the performance of work.

The City reports annually on any applications received pursuant to SB 35. Additionally, in an effort to increase transparency of the development permitting process, the California legislature adopted Assembly Bill 1483 in 2019 to require jurisdictions to post detailed information regarding development proposal requirements. A jurisdiction shall make all of the following available on its website, as applicable, and update any changes to the information within 30 days of the change:
• A current schedule of fees, exactions, and affordability requirements imposed by the City, applicable to a proposed housing development project, which shall be presented in a manner that clearly identifies the fees, exactions, and affordability requirements that apply to each parcel.

All zoning ordinances and development standards, which shall specify the zoning, design, and development standards that apply to each parcel.

The list required to be compiled of information that will be required from any applicant for a development project.

The current and five previous annual fee reports or the current and five previous annual financial reports.
•
•
•
• An archive of impact fee nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent, conducted by the City on or after January 1, 2018.

Permit Processes and Timelines
Residential projects in Lomita are reviewed by the Community Development Department and the County Building and Safety Department. Single-family residential uses are permitted by right in the A-1 and R-1 zoning designations. Development of a single unit is reviewed at the Page | 20 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *598
staff level only; no public hearing is required. Permits for developments that require only staff level review take approximately 4 weeks to review and if all requirements are met, the permit is approved. The length of time between approval from the City for an entitlement and when the applicant applies for a building permit is typically between two (2) and ten (10) months depending on the applicant and the availability of financing, as there is no processing or review required of the City between receipt of approval and application for a building permit, rather it is the project applicant’s responsibility to apply for needed permits. Once an applicant has received all necessary approvals and has submitted the application for their building permit, the review for the approval of the building permit takes approximately 4 – 6 weeks. Multifamily and condominium projects are allowed in the MUO and RVD zones.

Multifamily projects (new construction) require Site Plan review by the Planning Commission and are allowed by right in the RVD zones but require a CUP in the MUO zone. Multifamily projects and other residential projects requiring a variance must also be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Program 10, Affordable Housing Streamlining, will amend the Zoning Code and staff procedures to be consistent with State requirements related to the SB 35 streamlining processes. The City will also implement Program 29, Ongoing Code Updates, to continue updating its regulations, as necessary, in response to legislative changes, and will explore opportunities to increase flexibility and certainty in the development process.

The City’s 5th Cycle Housing Element identified the realistic capacity to be 80 percent of the zoning maximum. Because the City does not have a minimum density requirement within its Zoning Code, it did not have any requests to develop at densities below what was identified.

However, an analysis of the housing development permits issued during the 5th Cycle compared to the 5th Cycle sites identified reveals five developments on identified sites. Of those five developments, the percent of the maximum permitted density that was achieved for each development includes two developments at 100 percent of the maximum density permitted under the zone, one development at 50 percent of the maximum density permitted under the zone, one development at 80 percent of the maximum density permitted under the zone, and one development at 89 percent of the maximum density permitted under the zone. As identified in Program 14 of the Housing Element, the City will establish a density minimum of 20 dwelling units per acre for the MUO zoning designation, and as further identified in Program 16 of the Housing Element, the City will monitor development activity compared to remaining capacity and the City’s remaining Regional Housing Needs Allocation throughout the 6th Cycle.

Conditional Use Permits
The City uses the CUP process to control the location and operation of certain types of land uses to ensure public health, safety, or general welfare, or to mitigate/avoid material detriment to the property of other persons in the vicinity. The Lomita Zoning Code sets forth specific conditions that the Planning Commission may consider, which are discussed in the Land Use and Zoning section, above.

Page | 21 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *599
A CUP requires a public hearing and an application fee. Typically, a project requiring a CUP takes about 2 to 4 months in processing time. In comparison, a project requiring only a Site Plan Review takes about 6 weeks. The CUP process potentially extends the timeframe by 2 to 10 additional weeks, depending on whether there are other concurrent applications being processed, such as a tentative tract map.

The Planning Commission may approve a CUP, with or without conditions, only if it first finds that:
• the proposed use is allowed within the District with approval of a CUP and complies with all other applicable requirements as follows;
•
•
the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.
the design, location, size, and operating characteristics are compatible with existing and future land uses, building and structures in the vicinity and the proposed use will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety, or general welfare or be materially detrimental to the property of other persons located in the vicinity; the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this chapter, or as required as a condition in order to integrate the use with the uses in the neighborhood; and the site is served by highways and streets adequate to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate.
•
•
Site Plan Review
Site Plan Review is established to provide a visual and factual document to determine and regulate the physical layout, design, or use of a lot or parcel of land, buildings, or structures.

A Site Plan is, or may be, required in order to determine whether a proposed development will properly comply with the provisions and development standards, as described below.

The Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, may approve a Site Plan Review, with or without conditions, only if it first finds that:
•
•
the Site Plan complies with all applicable provisions of this Title; the site is suitable for the particular use or development intended, and the total development, including the application of prescribed development standards, is arranged as to avoid traffic congestion, will not adversely affect public health, safety and general welfare, will not have adverse effects on neighboring property, and is consistent with all elements of the General Plan; and
• the development design is suitable and functional. This requirement shall not be interpreted to require a particular style or type or architecture.

Variances
Variances permit alterations of development standards as they apply to particular uses when practical difficulties develop from the strict interpretation and enforcement of the Zoning Code. Zone variances may be granted, or variances may be required in particular cases, for building setbacks, height, bulk, density, parking, landscaping, walls, fencing, and business operation. A variance can take approximately 2 months to process.

Page | 22 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *600
The Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, may grant a variance from the required development standards, with or without conditions, only if it first finds that:
• there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, which do not generally apply to the surrounding properties in the same zone, and which deny the owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and within the same zoning district; because of the circumstances or conditions, the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property similarly situated but which is denied to the property in question;
•
• the granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent property; and
• the granting of the variance is consistent with the General Plan.

Zone Change
In some cases, it is allowable to change the zoning on a particular property. Zone changes are allowed only when the change will not be materially detrimental to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The zone change is applicable to the subject property only. A Specific Plan, Zoning Ordinance, or Zoning Map Amendment may be approved only if the City Council first finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan.

Height Variation Permit
A Height Variation Permit is required for any residential property south of Pacific Coast Highway proposing new construction or an addition to an existing home exceeding 16 feet above natural grade. The process initially requires a completed application form, construction plans, and all applicable fees paid. If less than 5 percent of those notified object to the height variation within 14 days of notification, and the Planning Department finds that the proposed construction is designed and situated in such a manner as to minimize view obstruction and meets all other zoning and subdivision requirements of the City, the Community Development Director may approve the application. If objections are received from 5 percent or more of those notified, a public hearing will be conducted before the Planning Commission.

Of the sites identified for the 6th Cycle Sites Analysis (Appendix E), only one site is south of Pacific Coast Highway, and only that site would be required to apply for a height variation permit to exceed 16 feet. The realistic capacity identified on the 0.38-acre vacant site that is located south of Pacific Coast Highway has only been identified to accommodate nine units of the moderate-income Regional Housing Needs Allocation. This permit does not apply to any other sites identified in the 6th Cycle Sites Analysis.

Subdivisions
In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision of land into four lots or units or fewer requires a parcel map, and any subdivision of five lots or units or more requires a tract map. Tentative maps are first submitted to the Planning Division with an application form and Page | 23 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *601
required fees. The Planning Division will route plans through the City’s Public Works Department and through the City’s engineering consultant for review and comment. The applicant must submit plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Land Development Division for review. The case planner will assist in this process. Comments and corrections required by the County, City departments, or other consultants will be provided. The tentative map is then scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council public hearings for approval. The Planning Commission and City Council will review the tentative map for consistency with the applicable zoning and General Plan land use designations.

Final maps are to be completed within the time frame allowed, and are again scheduled for City Council approval.

Subdivision projects typically take 12 to 30 months to process from the initial application to final building permit issuance.

Table 6: Permit Timelines
Approval Type Approximate Length of Time
Staff Level Review/ Building Permit 4-6 weeks
2 months
2-4 months
6 weeks
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Site Plan Review
Subdivision 12-30 months
Zone Change 2-18 months
Fees and Exactions
The schedule of permitting fees in Lomita is provided in Table 6. Planning Commission and City Council application fees are provided in Table 7. The City contracts with the County of Los Angeles to provide plan checking services. Plan checking fees are set by the County to cover the costs of services. The City’s last update to its fee schedule was in 2016.

Table 6: Permitting Fees
Administrative Task Fee
Administrative Plan Review
Adult Use Business
$64.77
$649.23
Banner Installation (Bracket over Narbonne Ave)
Certificate of Compliance
Film Permit
$178.50
$130.05
$162.18
GIS/Mapping Services
Inspections
Landscape Plan Review (single-family residential)
Staff Hourly Rate
Staff Hourly Rate
$130.05
Page | 24 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *602
Table 6: Permitting Fees
Administrative Task Fee
Landscape Plan Review (all others)
Lot Merger
Lot Line Adjustment
Mailing Labels/Radius Maps
Minor Modification
Miscellaneous Permit Issuance/Processing Fee
Plan Review/Code Compliance
Pre-Application Meeting (up to 2 hours)
Residential Property Report
Second Dwelling Unit
$259.59
$389.64
$649.23
$259.59
$194.82
Staff Hourly Rate
$259.59
$194.82
$162.18
$519.69
Sign Review $64.77
Special Event Permit $212.16
$64.77
$909.33
$97.41
Temporary Banner Review
Telecommunications Facilities – Administrative Review
Zone Clearance
Zoning Letter $130.05
Table 7: Planning Commission / City Council Application Fees Task Fee
Appeals to the City Council $669.12
$556.92
$162.18
$519.69
$779.28
$324.87
$194.82
$259.59
$617.10
$1,298.97
$779.28
$519.69
Appeals to the Planning Commission
Appeals of Lot Line Adjustment & Lot Merger
Appeals of an Adult Use Business
Conditional Use Permit
Determination of Similarity
Extension of Time – Community Development Director Approval Extension of Time – Planning Commission Approval
Final Map
General Plan Amendment
Height Variation Permit
Site Plan Review
Specific Plan Actual Cost plus Staff Hours
$1,298.97
$1,980.33 + $4,000 deposit
$2,110.38 + $10,000 deposit
Actual Cost plus Staff Hours
$1,818.66
Telecommunications Facilities – Planning Commission Review Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Tract Map
Traffic and Parking Studies
Zone Change
Zone Text Amendment $1,558.56
Zone Variance $1,039.38
Page | 25 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *603
In addition to permit fees, the City also charges development impact fees to offset the impact that new development has on public facilities. These fees include the following:
• Quimby Act Fees: Otherwise known as park fees that are in-lieu of land dedication require equivalent to 1.5 acres per 1,000 population
•
•
Park and Recreation Facilities Tax: $300 per unit
Water Facility Fees:
o
o
o
o
1 percent of building valuation for single-family residences

1.25 percent of building valuation for duplex

1.5 percent of building valuation of apartments (two-story maximum) 2 percent of building valuation of apartments (three-story and over) These taxes and fees can increase the cost of housing and may influence the economic feasibility of affordable housing projects. There is also a Road Improvement Fee; for construction, addition, and/or improvement of structures exceeding $35,000, road improvement fees are required to provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

When all development fees are considered for a typical development in Lomita, the average total development fee is approximately $15,000 for a single-family unit and $13,000 for a multifamily unit. Given that multifamily developments are a more efficient use of land and resources, impact fees should be significantly lower than those fees for single-family housing.

The 2019 National Impact Fees Survey surveyed 37 jurisdictions in California. The study reports median impact fees of $27,256 per single-family unit and $18,234 per multifamily unit in California. The City’s development impact fees are well below the Statewide average.

Further, the City also charges a development tax for all new construction. This tax is equal to $1,000 for every new housing unit or for every 5,000 square feet of commercial building floor area, including the commercial component of a mixed-use development. Affordable housing developments exclusively for older adults or persons with disabilities owned and operated by non-profit agencies may be exempt from this tax per the California Health and Safety Code.

To date, no affordable housing projects have been approved since adoption of the City’s development tax.

Overall, the City’s planning fees and development fees are low compared to neighboring jurisdictions. Furthermore, the Lomita Density Bonus Ordinance allows for an applicant to request regulatory incentives, which could be lowering or exempting project development fees depending on the Planning Commission’s discretion. Like all jurisdictions in the State, the City also charges building permit fees. However, the City does not differentiate the permit fees for single-family versus multifamily units. While fees can be a burden on the overall cost of development, they are considered necessary to accommodate the demands additional residents place on community resources and infrastructure.

Page | 26 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *604
Locally Adopted Ordinances
The City provides incentives to zoning regulations to promote and encourage the provision of a variety of affordable housing types. In addition to the lot consolidation incentive offered in the MUO zone, the City provides density bonuses for low-income housing projects. Due to recent amendments to the State’s Density Bonus Law, the City’s currently adopted Density Bonus Ordinance is more stringent than the State law allows, but the State Density Bonus Law still applies. An update to the ordinance will include a bonus for 100 percent affordable developments and revised bonus amounts, among other minor edits.

As part of the density bonus incentives, the City offers the following incentives, as adopted in the City’s Density Bonus Ordinance:
• Additional density provided the overall density bonus received for the entire residential development does not exceed 35%.
• A reduction in site development standards such as:
o
o
o
o
o
Reduced minimum lot sizes and/or dimensions.

Reduced minimum lot setbacks (up to 30%).

Reduced minimum private and/or common outdoor open space.

Increased maximum building height (up to one additional story).

Reduced on-site parking standards, including garage requirements (parking study required). • Change of zone to the City’s Mixed-Use zoning designation, but with a 20% commercial maximum. The proposed commercial land use shall be compatible with the housing project and the existing or planned development in the area where the proposed housing project will be located.
•
•
A 10% decrease in the commercial requirement for a mixed-use project in the Mixed-Use Overlay District. If the proposed mixed-use project also consolidates at least two parcels for a minimum 20,000 square feet a 20% decrease shall be permitted.

Other regulatory incentives that result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.

The City will continue to evaluate a range of incentive-based and regulatory approaches to facilitate the develop of housing for lower-income groups through Program 7, Incentives and Regulations, in the 6th Cycle Housing Element.

Non-Governmental Constraints
Non-governmental constraints are barriers to building housing that the City has less control over but can influence or help support greater change. These constraints include market constraints related to the availability of financing; the costs of land, labor, and construction; and construction timelines; as well as environmental constraints such as biological resources.

Market Constraints
Page | 27 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *605
Construction Financing
Construction financing costs also affect the feasibility of building new housing. During the housing boom of the late 1980s, it was not uncommon for developers to receive construction loans for 100 percent or more of a project’s estimated future value. Following the housing market downturn of the early 1990s, however, financial institutions tightened regulations for construction loans, often requiring developers to put up at least 25 percent of the project value. These trends continue today, meaning that developers must usually supply at least 25 percent of the project value upfront, and perhaps more if the total cost is more than 75 percent of the estimated value of the project.

Although there is no hard threshold for how much required upfront equity is too much before a residential project would be infeasible, the higher the proportion of equity required, the more unlikely that a developer would proceed with the project. Not only would it require more up-front cash, but higher equity contribution means a project must be able to achieve an even higher value at completion in order to generate the cash flow needed to meet acceptable cash-on-cash returns. These trends are anticipated to continue during the planning period.

Mortgage Financing
Home mortgage interest rates are a function of the national economy and personal credit ratings. Low rates make housing purchase attractive to prospective homebuyers and decrease monthly mortgages, because increased rates create differences in the monthly mortgage payment by as much as a few hundred dollars for each interest point.

The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act mandates that lending institutions disclose information on the disposition of loan applications, and the income, gender, and race of loan applicants.

Table 8 summarizes the disposition of loan applications submitted to financial institutions in 2019 for home purchase, refinance, and home improvement loans in Lomita. The loan outcome information in the table includes the number of applications that were approved, denied, or incomplete or withdrawn by the applicant. In Lomita in 2019, approximately 71 percent of all home loans were approved, including mortgages, home improvement loans, and refinance loans. Program 20, Homebuyer Assistance Programs, improves the City’s website outreach to connect the community with relevant information and resources regarding homeownership assistance.

Table 8: Disposition of Home Loans (2019)
Loan Type
Government-Backed
Purchase
Total Applicants Total Approved1 Total Denied Other2
10 6 0 4
Conventional
Purchase
214 160 19 35
Refinance
Home Improvement
287
46 208
22 27
16 52
8 Page | 28 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *606
Table 8: Disposition of Home Loans (2019)
Loan Type Total Applicants
557
Source: 2019 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Lending Activity MSA/MD by Census Tract Data Total Approved1
396
Total Denied Other2
Total 62 99
1 Approved includes loans approved by the lenders whether or not accepted by the applicant.

Other includes loan applications that were either withdrawn or closed for incompleteness. 2 Land and Construction Costs
Land costs are a major contributor to overall housing production prices. Land costs make up 10 percent to 30 percent of housing costs. Land in some areas costs more than others based on the availability of services, neighborhood quality, distance to business and commercial centers, and other factors. Few vacant properties remain in Lomita. Only one vacant property was listed for sale, at approximately $85 per square foot, but it comes with entitlements for a multifamily development. The property was last assessed at $447,264. In comparison, multifamily and mixed-use properties are likely more expensive on a per-square-foot basis and on a per-unit basis when cost as a percentage of total value is considered.

Construction costs include both “hard” and “soft” costs. Hard costs, such as labor and materials, typically account for 50 percent to 70 percent of construction costs, while soft costs, such as architectural and engineering services, development fees, construction financing, insurance, and permitting, typically average around 20 percent to 30 percent of total costs, although they can be higher for subsidized affordable housing or complex projects. A significant cost factor associated with residential building involves the cost for building materials. These can vary widely depending on the size of units and the quality of amenities offered (such as grade of carpeting and tiles, appliances and light fixtures, quality of cabinetry and woodwork, fireplaces, and other amenities). It is estimated that material costs have increased faster than inflation in recent years. From 2017 to 2020, the cost of raw materials (i.e., concrete, lumber, and steel) increased by approximately 20 percent, and during 2020, a shortage of materials was brought on by the COIVD-19 global pandemic, causing increases in costs and delays in product deliveries. Further, tariffs and trade issues can also increase material costs.

For multifamily attached units, developers can usually benefit from economies of scale with discounts for materials and diffusion of equipment mobilization costs. These costs can account for more than half of the total construction cost. According to the latest Building Valuation Data release in 2019, the national average for development costs per square foot for apartments and single-family homes in 2019 are as follows:
•
•
•
Type I or II, Multifamily: $148.82 to $168.94 per square foot Type V Wood Frame, Multifamily: $113.88 to $118.57 per square foot Type V Wood Frame, One- and Two-Family Dwelling: $123.68 to $131.34 per square foot Page | 29 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *607
Data from surrounding jurisdictions in Los Angeles County show that construction costs are relatively consistent throughout the County, ranging from approximately $150 to $375 per square foot, and therefore high construction costs are a regional constraint on housing development.

The costs of design, regulation, and operations do not vary much by building size, so larger buildings allow developers to spread these fixed costs over more units. In general, construction costs can be lowered by increasing the number of units in a development, reflecting economies of scale in multifamily construction, until the scale of the project requires a different construction type that commands a higher per-square-foot cost. This is because construction costs change substantially depending on the building type. For example, high-rise concrete apartments might cost $75 or more per square foot than a sixstory wood-frame structure on a concrete podium. Apartments four stories or fewer can typically achieve an economy of scale, provided that the building has typical amenities and no structured parking. However, for smaller-scale and affordable or middle-income housing, onerous regulations can impose a significant burden. Because of the jump in construction costs, developers may not build to the maximum height or floor-to-area ratio. Mobile homes are significantly less expensive, as are precision or factory-built housing products.

Labor costs also greatly contribute to construction costs. They are generally two to three times the cost of construction materials. A 2019 study for Smart Cities Prevail found that California lost about 200,000 construction workers since 2006. Many lost their job during the recession and found work in other industries. Pre-pandemic, the industry already faced this historic shortage of skilled labor, and the labor gaps might get even larger, especially in states like California. California’s shortage of needed construction workers, combined with rising prices in construction materials, also contributes to driving up construction costs.

Environmental Constraints
A number of environmental factors in Lomita affect the character and density of development in Lomita. These include natural resources, hazards, and safety concerns. Water supply and soils in Lomita, as well as earthquake and flood risks, are addressed.

Water Supply
Groundwater resources in Lomita consist of aquifers and aquicludes, as found in the Los Angeles groundwater basin within the Los Angeles coastal plain. Lomita is located on the southern end of the Torrance plain, which is underlain by water-bearing sediments that form a complex system of interlayered aquifers and aquicludes. Lomita is within the West Coast groundwater basin. The groundwater is estimated by the Los Angeles County General Plan Safety Element to be approximately 30 feet from the ground level at Lomita and the surrounding area. This indicates that the area is conducive to perched water conditions. The City is in the process of adopting a Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance that will require water conservation practices in landscape irrigation for new public and private developments.

Page | 30 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *608
Seismic Concerns
Active faults are identified by the U.S. Department of Conservation, and a zone around them is prohibited from new developments to prevent repetitive loss of structures and threats to the safety of occupants. The unsafe areas around active faults are regulatory zones referred to as Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. There are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones within City limits.

Geological Hazards
While numerous landslides have occurred in the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and the southern portion of Lomita consists of hillside areas, a review of the Los Angeles County General Plan Safety Element shows that no definite or probable landslide hazards exist within Lomita. Also, the hillside areas are largely developed, paved, and landscaped. Thus, landslide potential is limited.

Flooding
Lomita is located in an area designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Rate Maps as Zone C, where minimal flood hazards exist. Also, dam inundation hazards do not exist in Lomita since there are no large dams or reservoirs located near Lomita, except the Palos Verdes Reservoir. Dam failure and potential inundation from this reservoir will lead to localized flooding east and southeast of the reservoir and will not affect Lomita. Lomita is not vulnerable to 100-year or 500-year flood events. However, localized flooding could still occur in isolated pockets of Lomita due to urban flooding from severe weather events. Storm drain deficiencies could result in flooding and inundation of private properties.

Infrastructure Capacity
Residential development during this 6th Cycle Housing Element will primarily occur on properties that are previously developed. Dry utilities, including electricity, natural gas, cable, and telephone, are available at all sites identified in the Sites Analysis (Appendix E). The City’s utilities receive necessary upgrades and improvements based on future growth and development anticipated by the General Plan.

Water
According to the City of Lomita Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), water service is provided by the City’s own local sources and the West Basin Municipal Water District, which supplies water through the California Water Project. The local water supply sources include groundwater pumped from the City’s local basin (West Coast Basin) through Well No. 5.

However, complications with contamination in the recent past has lowered its supply rate.

The City is investigating further capital improvements to increase efficiency and quality of the potable water. Imported water supply originates from two sources: the Colorado River and the Bay Delta. According to the 2020 UWMP, by 2022 groundwater will constitute Page | 31 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *609
approximately one-third of the total water extraction, while imported water will supply the remaining two-thirds. The City is allowed to pump 1,352 acre-feet per year, and plans to do so once Well No. 5 is back online in late 2021. The City also aims to expand its water recycling capabilities and lower water demand through various programs and strategies. Historical records have proved sustainable and intentional groundwater recharge practices are being performed in the City. Therefore, the groundwater supplies in the West Coast Basin are deemed reliable.

According to the UWMP, the City is approaching ultimate “built-out,” with remaining expected future water demands primarily attributable to possible land use changes in residential densities and in-fill land development projects. While the City’s population has slowly increased, the overall water usage has decreased by significant margins. According to the 2020 UWMP, annual water consumption from 1996 to 2015 listed in the 2010 UWMP ranged from a high of 2,835 acre-feet (AF) in 2002 to a low of 2,030 AF in 2020, with an average of 2,532 AF.

The City serves water to approximately 4,300 connections. Of these, the vast majority are residential connections (94 percent), with the majority of residential connections being singlefamily residential (3,712 connections).

According to the U.S. Census American Community Survey, approximately 10 percent of the population is below the poverty line. In 2020, those living below the poverty line in Lomita consumed a total of 150 AF. The City is committed to ensuring its lower-income residents have access to safe, affordable, and reliable drinking water.

The 2020 UWMP indicates that the City’s water supply is projected to exceed its demands up until 2045 (the analysis ends at the year 2045). Further, the City aims to be 100 percent groundwater sustainable in the future, which decreases relying on the fluctuating availability of imported water. The City projects that in 2045, expecting normal weather conditions, the City will have a surplus of 1,794 AF for the year, which will be stored in the Cypress Reservoir, which will increase the community’s resilience to water shortages and droughts.

The City has multiple local ordinances to promote water security, including a contingency plan (Water Conservation and Drought Management Plan, Section 12-4 of the Lomita Municipal Code). In addition to the local water plans, there are regional and basin level contingency plans that the City participates in. According to the UWMP, the average amount of water an individual used per day between 2016 and 2020 was 92 gallons. Most future housing production will occur from denser redevelopment due to the City’s built-out nature.

Assuming that the new units will be apartments or condos, the UWMP estimates that approximately 2.5 persons per household can be reasonably expected. If all the identified sites in the Sites Analysis (Appendix E, Tables A and B) are redeveloped at their full capacity, this would create an additional 1,000 units or 230,000 gallons per day (258 AF annually) of water demand by the end of the 6th Cycle. The City’s water system has the capacity to satisfy Page | 32 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *610
potential housing growth of the Housing Element’s identified sites found in the Sites Analysis (Appendix E).

Sewers
While the City does not currently have a Sewer Master Plan, it is investigating possible solutions to designate funding sources for potential future upgrades to the system infrastructure that the City owns. A Sewer Master Plan could provide for an assessment of the conditions of the existing sewer collection system, as well as prepare for future capacity investments as demand shifts.

Wastewater generated within the City of Lomita is treated by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD). The City’s local sewers tie into LACSD’s regional trunk sewers. The City is served by the LACSD’s sewer lines, which are maintained by the County Department of Public Works, with sewage from the area conveyed through sewer mains into the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP) in Carson. The JWPCP has a design capacity of 400 million gallons per day and currently treats 280 million gallons per day. Therefore, the JWPCP has a remaining capacity of approximately 120 million gallons per day. The cumulative sewage generation of the sites identified in the Sites Analysis is well within the capacity of the JWPCP, and the facilities are adequate to serve the identified capacity. Given the projected demand and the existing remaining treatment capacity, future developments’ treatment demand can be met by the service provider. Expansion or construction of a new wastewater treatment facility to meet the demands of the 2021–2029 Housing Element update is not required.

Stormwater
The City is served by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, which operates and maintains regional and municipal storm drainage facilities. The City works with the Flood Control District in making local drainage plans and improvements. The existing storm drain infrastructure can accommodate the projected runoff from the potential residential development anticipated for this planning cycle. The projected stormwater runoff is not anticipated to significantly increase with future residential development given the nature and extent of existing impervious surfaces within the City and its built-out nature. Further, Title 5 Chapter 8 and 9 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes requirements for development and redevelopment to integrate low-impact-development practices that reduces stormwater runoff.

Analysis of Local Efforts to Remove Constraints
The City has made strides to reduce constraints to development that are within the City’s purview since the Housing Element was last updated in 2013. Reductions to constraints during the 5th Cycle Housing Element included the following:
• Amendment to the Zoning Code in 2020 to reduce parking requirements for multifamily and single-family residences – Reduce the required number of parking spaces for residential units with five or more bedrooms from three spaces in a garage to two spaces in a garage, and Page | 33 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *611
require one unenclosed parking space for a single-family home with four bedrooms and one additional unenclosed parking space for a single-family home with five or more bedrooms.

Amendment to the Zoning Code in 2018 – An update to the ADU regulations consistent with State law.
•
•
•
•
Amendment to the Zoning Code in 2013 to permit emergency shelters.

Amendment to the Zoning Code in 2013 to include appeal procedures for City Council decisions.

Adoption of an ordinance in 2013 for guidance on waste management of construction and demolition debris.

Non-governmental constraints are generally market driven and outside the control of local government, but the City can take action to help alleviate some of these constraints in the form of regulatory relief and increased certainty in the development process. The policies and programs set forth in the 6th Cycle Housing Element demonstrate the City’s commitment to the reduction of barriers to development while protecting other interests, such as quality of life, parks and open space, and local resources.

Quantified Objectives
Table 9 summarizes the quantifiable objectives outlined in the Housing Element.

Table 9. Summary of Quantifiable Objectives
Income / Regional Housing
Needs Allocation
New Units to be At-Risk Units to
be Preserved*
Households to be
Affordability Construction Rehabilitated Assisted
Category
Extremely Low /
Very Low
239 151 20
20 34 20
Low 124
128
338
829
71 33 60
Moderate 40
Above Moderate
Total
128
338
688 40 67 120
* At-risk units are those units with affordability restrictions that will expire in the next 10 years.

Page | 34 Appendix C
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *612
Appendix D:

Affirmatively Further Fair
Housing Analysis
Contents
Appendix D: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Analysis..................................................................1 Assessment of Fair Housing................................................................................................................4 Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity........................................................................4 Findings, Lawsuits, Enforcement Actions, Settlements, or Judgements..................................6 Findings...............................................................................................................................................6 Compliance with Existing Fair Housing Laws and Regulations.................................................7 Integration and Segregation Patterns and Trends Related to People with Protected Characteristics and Lower Incomes ...................................................................................................7 Race/Ethnicity ..................................................................................................................................10 Income ..............................................................................................................................................12 Familial Status..................................................................................................................................16 Persons with Disabilities.................................................................................................................18 Findings.............................................................................................................................................19 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty................................................................19 Findings.............................................................................................................................................24 Local Knowledge.............................................................................................................................25 Disparities in Access to Opportunity................................................................................................26 Education..........................................................................................................................................26 Employment.....................................................................................................................................28 Transportation.................................................................................................................................30 Healthy Environment......................................................................................................................32 Page | 1 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *613
Disparities in Access to Opportunity for Persons with Disabilities.........................................33 Findings.............................................................................................................................................33 Disproportionate Housing Needs, Including Displacement........................................................34 Cost Burden .....................................................................................................................................35 Overcrowding..................................................................................................................................38 Substandard Housing.....................................................................................................................40 Displacement...................................................................................................................................42 Investment-Driven Displacement.................................................................................................43 Disaster-Driven Displacement ......................................................................................................45 Identification and Prioritization of Contributing Factors..............................................................45 Fair Housing Issues and Contributing Factors...........................................................................45 Prioritization of Contributing Factors and Actions Designed to Meaningfully Address Contributing Factors.......................................................................................................................46 Figures
Figure 1: Redlining in Lomita in 1935 ..........................................................................................................8 Figure 2: Race/Ethnicity in Lomita in 2019.................................................................................................9 Figure 3: 2010 Segregation/Integration by Tract...................................................................................10 Figure 4: Predominant Population - White Majority Tracts.................................................................11 Figure 4a: Regional Predominant Population - White Majority Tracts.............................................11 Figure 5: Racial Demographic (2018) – Block Group............................................................................12 Figure 5a: Regional Racial Demographic (2018) – Block Group........................................................12 Figure 6: Poverty Status (ACS 2015–2019) – Tract.................................................................................13 Figure 6a: Regional Poverty Status (ACS 2015-2019) – Tract .............................................................14 Figure 6b: Poverty Status (ACS 2010-2014) – Tract...............................................................................14 Figure 7: Median Income (ACS, 2015-2019) – Block Group................................................................15 Figure 7a: Regional Median Income (ACS, 2015-2019) – Block Group............................................15 Figure 7b: Median Income (ACS, 2010-2014) – Block Group .............................................................16 Figure 8: Female-Headed Households.....................................................................................................17 Figure 8a: Female-Headed Households in the Region........................................................................17 Figure 9: Population with a Disability........................................................................................................18 Figure 9a: Regional Population with a Disability....................................................................................19 Figure 10: R/ECAP (2009-2013)...................................................................................................................21 Figure 10a: Regional R/ECAP (2009-2013)...............................................................................................21 Figure 10b: R/ECAA (2015-2019) ...............................................................................................................22 Figure 10c: Regional R/ECAA (2015-2019) ..............................................................................................23 Page | 2 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *614
Figure 11: TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map.................................................................................................24 Figure 11a: Regional TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map.............................................................................24 Figure 12: Education Domain Score......................................................................................................... 27 Figure 12a: Regional Education Domain Score..................................................................................... 27 Figure 13: Economic Domain Score .........................................................................................................28 Figure 13a: Regional Economic Domain Score .....................................................................................29 Figure 14: Jobs Proximity Index .................................................................................................................29 Figure 14a: Regional Jobs Proximity Index .............................................................................................30 Figure 15: Dial-A-Ride...................................................................................................................................31 Figure 16: Environmental Domain Score.................................................................................................32 Figure 16a: Regional Environmental Domain Score.............................................................................33 Figure 17: Race/Ethnicity of Homeowners..............................................................................................35 Figure 18: Renter Cost Burden...................................................................................................................36 Figure 18a: Regional Renter Cost Burden...............................................................................................36 Figure 19: Homeowner Cost Burden........................................................................................................ 37 Figure 19a: Regional Homeowner Cost Burden.................................................................................... 37 Figure 20: Overcrowded Households......................................................................................................38 Figure 20a: Overcrowded Households in the Region.........................................................................39 Figure 21: Severely Overcrowded Households......................................................................................39 Figure 21a: Severely Overcrowded Households in the Region.........................................................40 Figure 22: Percent of Households with Any of Four Housing Problems.........................................41 Figure 22a: Percent of Households with Any of Four Housing Problems in the Region...........42 Figure 23: Gentrification and Displacement Map.................................................................................43 Figure 24: Mobile Home Parks..................................................................................................................44 Figure 24a: Mobile Home Parks in the Region .....................................................................................44 Figure 25: Discrimination Cases (Total, 2020) ........................................................................................51 Tables
Table 1. Households with Any of Four Housing Problems..................................................................41 Table 2: Contributing Factors to Fair Housing......................................................................................53 Page | 3 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *615
Assessment of Fair Housing
State law prohibits discrimination in the development process or in real property transactions, and it is the policy of the City of Lomita (City) to uphold the law in this regard. Fair housing issues are addressed in Lomita through coordination with fair housing organizations to process complaints regarding housing discrimination and to provide counseling in landlord/tenant disputes. Anti-discrimination resource materials (e.g., handouts, booklets, and pamphlets) are made available to the public at City Hall, the library, and on the City’s website through links to the Housing Rights Center.

Assembly Bill 686 requires that all Housing Elements due on or after January 1, 2021, must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the Federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule of July 16, 2015.

Under State law, affirmatively further fair housing means “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics.”
There are three parts to this requirement:

1. Include a program that affirmatively furthers fair housing and promotes housing opportunities throughout the community for protected classes (applies to Housing Elements beginning January 1, 2019).

2. Conduct an assessment of fair housing that includes a summary of fair housing issues; an analysis of available Federal, State, and local data and local knowledge to identify fair housing issues; and an assessment of the contributing factors for the fair housing issues.

3. Prepare the Housing Element Land Inventory and Identification of Sites through the lens of affirmatively furthering fair housing.

In compliance with Assembly Bill 686, the City has completed the following outreach and analysis.

Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity
The 2018 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for the Community Development Commission and the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA) serves as the fair housing planning document for portions of Los Angeles County, including unincorporated areas and the Urban County, which represents 47 smaller cities in Los Angeles County, including the City of Lomita. This area is referred to as the “Urban County” or “service area.” As a part of the consolidated planning process, entitlement communities that receive Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships, Emergency Shelter Grants, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS funds as a formula allocation directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Page | 4 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *616
(HUD) are required to submit to HUD certification that they are affirmatively furthering fair housing. The Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles (CDC) and the HACoLA have formed a joint effort to prepare, conduct, and submit to HUD their certification for affirmatively furthering fair housing, which is presented in this Analysis of Impediments. On May 16, 2019, the CDC was officially rebranded as the Los Angeles County Development Authority. Because the Analysis of Impediments references the CDC, this section will also refer to the agency as CDC.

Fair housing is a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market have like ranges of choice available to them regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, familial status, ancestry, age, marital status, gender, gender identity, gender expression, genetic information, sexual orientation, source of income, or any other arbitrary factor. The Analysis of Impediments examines local housing conditions, economics, policies, and practices to ensure that housing choices and opportunities for all residents are available in an environment free from discrimination. The Analysis of Impediments assembles fair housing information, identifies existing impediments that limit housing choice, and proposes actions to mitigate those impediments.

A review of the fair housing profile in the Los Angeles Urban County revealed that there are several organizations that provide fair housing services, including outreach and education, complaint intake, and testing and enforcement activities, for both providers and consumers of housing. These organizations include HUD; the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which exists as a substantially equivalent agency to HUD in the State; and the Housing Rights Center (HRC), which primarily operates in Los Angeles County. HRC receives a multi-year grant from HUD to conduct systemic testing in areas within Los Angeles County where statistics point to any form of discrimination covered by applicable fair housing laws, and persistent housing discrimination based on race, national origin, familial status, or disability. HRC also provides intake of allegations of housing discrimination, and provides resolution for housing discrimination, including mediation and litigation. The HACoLA provides fair housing resources for residents via its website, such as links to file complaints of a violation of fair housing, a link to HRC, a link to HUD’s webpage on Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, a link to the National Fair Housing Advocate Online blog, a copy of HACoLA’s non-discrimination policy, and a link to information on the Assessment of Fair Housing.

The fair housing outreach capacity of the City exists through its continued contract with HRC.

HRC investigates fair housing complaints, obtains remedies, and engages in fair housing testing. Specifically, HRC provides the following services on behalf of the City of Lomita:
• Housing Counseling – HRC Housing Counselors are available to answer questions about tenant/landlord rights and obligations, including topics like security deposits, evictions, repairs, rent increases, and harassment. Conversations with Housing Counselors are private and confidential, and connect residents to needed resources.

Page | 5 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *617
•
•
•
Discrimination Investigation and Disability Accommodations – HRC Case Analysts investigate allegations of housing discrimination and help victims of discrimination enforce their fair housing rights. HRC helps tenants with disabilities assert their right to request accommodations or modifications in their home.

Community Workshops and Events – HRC offers education and outreach programs to raise awareness about fair housing laws, illegal practices, and tenant/landlord rights. HRC’s weekly online workshops are free and open to the public, they are all virtual, and are offered in both English and Spanish.

Project Place – Monthly Rental Listing – HRC’s monthly rental listing, Project Place, lists available affordable housing, senior housing, and veteran housing throughout Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.

Through Program 22 of the Housing Element, the City has committed to continue contracting with HRC for providing fair housing services for Lomita’s residents. Further, through this program, the City will distribute information on fair housing services through monthly newsletters. Further, this program includes an objective to provide annual staff trainings to ensure that all staff are regularly informed on processes and procedures related to complaint referrals to HRC.

HUD’s fair housing complaint data from 2008 through 2016 was calculated for the Los Angeles County service area. During that time, the most common basis for a complaint was for some form of a disability, that being the basis for nearly twice as many complaints as the next most common basis – race. Of all complaints found with cause, disability was also the most common basis for the complaint, although not by such a runaway margin. Disability was the most common basis, cited 370 times in complaints, followed by familial status and race as the basis for 238 and 145 complaints, respectively. Fair housing complaints were most common in 2008, when 456 were logged, and have steadily grown in number from only 186 in 2012. Other complaints during that time, besides those already listed, were largely based on familial status, retaliation, national origin, and sex. Of the 2,610 complaints logged from 2008 through 2016, all of them were closed, dismissed, or settled in a variety of ways. Nearly 57 percent of these complaints were determined to have no cause, while 564 (or 21.6 percent) of the complaints were deemed successfully settled. Of all complaints found with cause, the most common issue was failure to make reasonable accommodation, the issue being cited 290 times. The next most cited issue was discriminatory terms, conditions, privileges, or services and facilities.

Findings, Lawsuits, Enforcement Actions, Settlements, or Judgements There are no known fair housing findings, lawsuits, enforcement actions, settlements, or judgements in the City of Lomita.

Findings
The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) identified fewer than one fairhousing-related inquiry for every 1,000 persons from 2013 to 2021. In total, there were 12 fair Page | 6 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *618
housing related inquiries from 2013 to 2021 one of which was for disability discrimination, three for familial status, one for national origin, and seven “None.” All inquiries were dismissed due to failure to respond, no valid basis or decision not to pursue.

Compliance with Existing Fair Housing Laws and Regulations The City of Lomita is in compliance with existing fair housing laws and regulations. The City assists local fair housing organizations to address complaints regarding housing discrimination within the City and to provide counseling in landlord/tenant disputes. The City publicizes the availability of fair housing services through various media, including information on the City’s website and referral information at City Hall. Programs of the Housing Element that will further publicize fair housing laws and regulations include Program 22 to continue to contract with the HRC to provide fair housing services, and Program 23 to develop marketing material standards guidance for developers.

Integration and Segregation Patterns and Trends Related to People with Protected Characteristics and Lower Incomes
Residents in highly segregated Black and Hispanic neighborhoods experience vastly poorer life outcomes than residents of White neighborhoods in income, housing equity, educational attainment, and life expectancy, according to research from the University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley). Like many regions throughout the United States, Los Angeles has a history of excluding non-White people from the housing market through practices such as mortgage redlining. Mortgage redlining is a mapping exercise practiced by the Federal government’s Home Owners’ Loan Corporation used to guide mortgage lending desirability in residential neighborhoods based on racial and ethnic demographics, making it difficult for people of color to access loans for homeownership. Figure 1, Redlining in Lomita in 1935, shows a map of redlining that took place in Lomita in 1935. Large portions of Lomita were identified as receiving a grade of “D,” which is the lowest favorability score for the approval of home mortgage loans. While redlining practices have since been made illegal, access to wealth provided through mortgage loan access has primarily been afforded to the White population, providing White people with increased opportunities to gain more wealth through access to things like education and financial investments. Affirmatively furthering fair housing involves overcoming patterns of segregation that foster inclusive communities.

Page | 7 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *619
Figure 1: Redlining in Lomita in 1935
In 2019, 43 percent of Lomita’s residents were non-White, and 33 percent of the population was of Hispanic origin, which may be of any race or multiple races. The population within the City of Lomita is predominately White (56.7 percent in 2019), but when compared to California’s total population, which consisted of nearly 72 percent White people in 2019, Lomita is much more racially diverse. The increased diversity in Lomita may be directly tied to the historical redlining of the area, where non-White generations have remained over the years. Further, when compared to the northern and coastal communities in the region, Lomita has a larger proportion of non-White residents. Figure 2, Race/Ethnicity in Lomita in 2019, shows the percentage of the total non-White population in Lomita.

Page | 8 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *620
Figure 2: Race/Ethnicity in Lomita in 2019
7%
White
13%
Black or African American

0.3%
16%
American Indian and Alaska
Native
Asian
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander
57%
Other Alone
1%
6%
Two or more races
The “Dissimilarity Index” provides a quantitative measure of segregation in an area based on the demographic composition of smaller geographic units within that area. One way of understanding the index is that it indicates how evenly two demographic groups are distributed throughout an area: if the composition of both groups in each geographic unit (e.g., Census tract) is the same as in the area as a whole (e.g., county), then the Dissimilarity Index score for that entire area will be 0. By contrast, and again using Census tracts as an example, if one population is clustered entirely within one Census tract, the Dissimilarity Index score for that entire area will be 100. The higher the Dissimilarity Index value, the higher the level of segregation in an area. A Dissimilarity Index value of 100 is the highest level of segregation.

For the Los Angeles Urban County, the Dissimilarity Index shows a mix of moderate and high levels of segregation between racial or ethnic groups (see Figure 3). Asian (non-Hispanic) populations show the lowest race-specific levels of segregation with White people (nonHispanic), with an index of 53.0. Hispanic people have the highest levels of segregation, with an index of 64.9, while Black people (non-Hispanic) show the next-highest index at 64.2. The non-White and White populations show a segregation index of 55.7, indicating a high level of segregation within the Urban County. Long Beach and Los Angeles have the highest Dissimilarity Index values, with consistently moderate to high levels of segregation among the ethnic/racial groups. For the Urban County, the non-White/White Dissimilarity Index has remained consistent since 1990, dropping a single point value since then. These numbers indicate the non-White/White index values have been hovering just inside the “high Page | 9 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *621
segregation” thresholds since 1990. The Black/White index value peaked in 1990, with a value of nearly 73, but has fallen and remained steady near a value of 67 since that time. The Hispanic/White index value has fallen nearly a full point value since 2010 but is nearly 2 full point values higher than it was in 1990. Finally, the Asian/White index value has risen steadily since its 1990 value of just over 46 to a peak of 50.21 in 2010; 2015 was the first year the index had fallen in value (down about 0.25 of a value point).

Figure 3: 2010 Segregation/Integration by Tract
The following analysis examines geographic data regarding racial segregation, poverty, persons with disabilities, and areas of opportunity as identified by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee/California Department of Housing and Community Development (TCAC/HCD) Opportunity Areas map.

Race/Ethnicity
Racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) are Census tracts with relatively high concentrations of non-White residents with these residents living in poverty. As seen in Figures 4 and 4a, the percentage of non-White population in the City is moderate compared to many areas of Los Angeles County. The Census block groups with the highest percentage of non-White residents are located in the central/eastern and south/western portion of the City, as shown in Figure 5, with the non-White population of this area ranging from 62.79 percent to 69.85 percent. There are no block groups with a Hispanic, Asian, African American, or Native American population that exceed 10 percent. When compared to the region (Figure 5a), Lomita and cities north, south, and west are predominantly White, while cities to the east have far fewer White individuals and a much higher percentage of nonWhite individuals.

Page | 10 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *622
Figure 4: Predominant Population - White Majority Tracts Figure 4a: Regional Predominant Population - White Majority Tracts Page | 11 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *623
Figure 5: Racial Demographic (2018) – Block Group
Figure 5a: Regional Racial Demographic (2018) – Block Group Income
Recent Census estimates regarding poverty status of households in Lomita are shown in Figure 6. As seen in this map, there are low concentrations of poverty in two of the four Census tracts, with the poverty rate less than 20 percent for these two Census tracts. Within Page | 12 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *624
each of these Census tracts, there is one block group with a median income less than $55,000. The City experiences lower poverty rates since the last assessment, which spanned 2010–2014 (see Figure 6b). Regionally, the south and east neighboring communities experience the same or higher rates of poverty (see Figure 6a).

Figures 7, 7a, and 7b depict the trends and patterns of the local and regional median income overtime. Mirroring the poverty rate, median income increased over time. The present median incomes of each Census tract are similar to that of neighboring communities to the north, east, and south. Median incomes to the west are far higher, mirroring the increased proximity to jobs and lower poverty rates.

Figure 6: Poverty Status (ACS 2015–2019) – Tract
Page | 13 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *625
Figure 6a: Regional Poverty Status (ACS 2015-2019) – Tract Figure 6b: Poverty Status (ACS 2010-2014) – Tract
Page | 14 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *626
Figure 7: Median Income (ACS, 2015-2019) – Block Group
Figure 7a: Regional Median Income (ACS, 2015-2019) – Block Group Page | 15 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *627
Figure 7b: Median Income (ACS, 2010-2014) – Block Group Familial Status
Female-headed households comprise between 20 percent and 40 percent in one Census tract, as shown in Figure 8. Otherwise, the remaining Census tract have less than 20 percent female-headed households. Three Census tracts have 60 percent to 80 percent of children in married-couple households, with the fourth Census tract exceeding 80 percent. The entire Lomita community has between 40 percent and 60 percent of the population 18 years and older in households living with a spouse. Less than 20 percent of households over 18 years of age are living alone. When compared to neighboring communities (Figure 8a), Lomita is similar to the immediate context; however, farther southeast there is a much higher rate of female-headed households.

Page | 16 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *628
Figure 8: Female-Headed Households
Figure 8a: Female-Headed Households in the Region
Page | 17 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *629
Persons with Disabilities
The incidence of disabilities is moderate in Lomita compared to many areas of Los Angeles County. As shown in Figure 9, the percentage of residents reporting a disability is less than 20 percent in three Census tracts in the City, with the remaining Census tract less than 10 percent. Overall, the percent of population with a disability remained constant over time in every Census tract and adjacent communities. There appears to be no distinct difference between rates of disabilities in Lomita as compared to the region (Figure 9a).

Figure 9: Population with a Disability
Page | 18 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *630
Figure 9a: Regional Population with a Disability
Findings
Given Lomita’s history as a formerly redlined community, once predominately populated by non-White residents, it retains much of the area’s racial integration today. Lomita is generally a racially integrated community. The UC Berkeley Othering and Belonging Institute publication The Roots of Structural Racism Project (June 2021) identified two Census tracts in Lomita as being racially integrated, and the remaining two Census tracts with low-medium segregation.

This is significant as at a regional level, the majority of Census tracts indicate high segregation, and few cities have racially integrated tracts.

Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty
The are no Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) in the City. An area is designated a R/ECAP if two conditions are satisfied: first, the non-White population, whether Hispanic or non-Hispanic, must account for at least 50 percent of the Census tract population. Second, the poverty rate in that Census must exceed a certain threshold. That threshold is set at either 40 percent or three times the overall poverty rate, whichever is lower. Again, no R/ECAPs are identified in the City of Lomita, as shown in Figure 10.

Additionally, Figure 10a compares this data to Lomita’s surrounding cities where R/ECAPs are located to the south. Those areas adjacent to Lomita are not located near any existing residents, residential uses, or residential zones or residential land uses located in Lomita.

Page | 19 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *631
Further, while R/ECAPs indicate high concentrations of non-White residents where a disproportionate number of residents live in poverty, areas of affluence indicate Census tracts where 80 percent of the population is White, and the median household income is $125,000 or more. The City does not have any areas of affluence meeting the aforementioned criteria.

As shown in Figure 4 and Figure 7b, while the City does have a small area of those earning $125,000 or more, it should be noted that this data is not representative of Lomita’s residents, as the housing opportunities that fall within this area of Lomita are limited to the Harbor Hills development, which provides affordable housing for more than 300 households, and only a few single-family homes. This data is captured through the Census Tract to the south of Lomita’s boundaries. The City does not have any areas where 80 percent or more of the population is White. In July of 2022, HCD updated the methodology for calculating Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence (R/ECAA). This methodology identifies R/ECAAs as those Census tracts that have a white population 1.25 times higher than the region and an AMI more than 1.5 times the region or the State, whichever is lower. The City has a small area identified as a R/ECAA and again, this data is not representative of Lomita’s residents, as the housing opportunities that fall within this area of Lomita are limited to the Harbor Hills development, which provides affordable housing for more than 300 households, and only a few single-family homes. This data is captured south of Lomita’s boundaries, which Lomita shares a small portion of the tract. See Figure 10b and Figure 10c below.

Three Census tracts are identified as “high resource,” as shown in Figure 11. The southernmost Census tract is primarily identified as “moderate resource” and includes an area south of Palos Verdes Drive North as “highest resource.” There is a small area identified as “low resource” due to the presence of the Naval Defense Fuel Support facility.

To the west of Lomita, communities experience consistently high resourced areas. To the west, there is also a concentration of high-income White individuals, while to the east is a more diverse population with lower median incomes and higher poverty, thus there are pockets of High Segregation and High Poverty in the region (Figure 11a).

Page | 20 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *632
Figure 10: R/ECAP (2009-2013)
Figure 10a: Regional R/ECAP (2009-2013)
Page | 21 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *633
Figure 10b: R/ECAA (2015-2019)
Page | 22 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *634
Figure 10c: Regional R/ECAA (2015-2019)
Page | 23 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *635
Figure 11: TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map
Figure 11a: Regional TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map
Findings
According to the 2020 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map (Figure 11), Lomita is predominately within designated “highest resource” areas. Highest resource areas are those Page | 24 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *636
with very high index scores for a variety of educational, environmental, and economic indicators. Some of the indicators identified by TCAC include high levels of employment and close proximity to jobs, access to effective educational opportunities for both children and adults, low concentration of poverty, and low levels of environmental pollutants, among others. TCAC areas increase opportunities for affordable housing developers that qualify for tax credits. Nearly all of the sites identified at all income levels and all sites identified for lower-income housing in the Sites Inventory Form and detailed in Appendix E, Sites Analysis, are in Lomita’s high-resource areas, further increasing the likelihood that affordable housing can realistically be developed within the planning period.

The City does not have any R/ECAPs or areas of affluence, as aforementioned. When compared to the surrounding area, there are R/ECAPs located southeast of Lomita. Although the City does not have authority in these jurisdictions, through the sites identified, they can continue to promote integrated and mixed-income neighborhoods within Lomita (refer to Appendix E for sites identified).

Local Knowledge
While no R/ECAPs exist in the City, past federal policies, practices, and investments that have led to the establishment of R/ECAPs at the regional level, specifically in the southeastern portions, may be attributed to historical underinvestment before the cities in the southern portions of Los Angeles were incorporated. The City of Lomita “began” as a residential tract (Lomita Subdivision) in the early 1900s and became oil drilling land and agricultural lands in the 1920s. The Lomita Subdivision covered 7 square miles in 1907, and further development was spurred. Lomita became a center for agriculture and oil extraction activities in the South Bay area. By 1935, the developed areas of Lomita were redlined, leaving residents with little access to home loans.

The LA Conservancy notes that even though the 1930s continued to be a relatively prosperous time in Los Angeles due to a booming entertainment industry, the Great Depression took its toll on a large percentage of Los Angeles’ population. Architecture critic Esther McCoy wrote that during the Depression, “30 percent of all dwellings in Los Angeles had no inside toilet, 50 percent had no bathtub, and 20 percent were unfit for human habitation.” To combat the high rates of substandard habitation, public housing developments were developed throughout Los Angeles County. Occupying a hilly site in Lomita near the Palos Verdes peninsula, Harbor Hills opened in 1941. Harbor Hills was developed by the HACoLA and still offers more than 300 affordable units on a 27-acre site in Lomita.

The City of Lomita incorporated in 1964, at which point, the City was mostly built out with scattered vacant parcels. The push for incorporation was primarily a result of wanting to keep a small-town atmosphere, which is reflective of Lomita today, demonstrating that the patterns over time as it relates to policies and community outlook continue today. Historical low-density development, although a result of the once agricultural nature of the community, Page | 25 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *637
established early patterns of development that still exist today, creating an imbalance of single-family development as compared to multifamily development. As further described in Appendix B, 60% of all units in Lomita consist of single unit attached and detached houses, whereas those units with two or more make up approximately 35 percent of the housing stock. The community is known for the generations of families that call Lomita home. Local businesses, schools, religious organizations, and other institutions have thrived due to a supportive and stable community and government. Lomita is gradually seeing development that is changing some of the long-standing characteristics of the built environment, but the sense of community character remains unchanged.

Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Lower-income households and racially segregated communities are disproportionately impacted by a combination of locational factors such as proximity to landfills, areas prone to flooding, freeways, industrial areas, and other toxins and pollutants.

The location of affordable housing in areas proximate to resources provides lower-income residents with increased access to opportunities, such as increased education through quality schools, employment options, transportation options, low poverty exposure, and environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Research indicates that among various economic and social factors, being in proximity to certain amenities can encourage positive critical life outcomes. Areas that offer lower-income households the best chance at economic advancement, high educational attainment, and good physical and mental health are ideal for affordable housing development.

Education
Lomita’s education domain score represents the range of education outcomes. When compared to surrounding coastal communities, Lomita’s score is lower but higher when compared to communities to the east. Lomita’s score ranges from 0.25 to 0.75, representing a range of moderate education outcomes, as shown in Figure 12. When comparing the education domain score to Figure 4, White Majority Tracts, it appears the populations with fewer White individuals, in the southeast of the city, experience lower educational domain scores. And the area shown to have a median income of $125,000 or more in Figure 7 has higher educational outcomes. Communities to the west of Lomita experience greater scores, while the communities to the east experience lower scores (Figure 12a).

Page | 26 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *638
Figure 12: Education Domain Score
Figure 12a: Regional Education Domain Score
Page | 27 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *639
Employment
Lomita’s economic domain score represents the range of economic opportunities in the area.

When compared to surrounding coastal communities, Lomita’s score is lower, but higher when compared to communities to the east. Lomita’s score ranges from 0.50 and up, which shows a relatively positive economic outcome, as shown in Figures 13 and 13a. Further, Figure 14 show that those in the northern and western portions of the City have the greatest access to employment based on proximity, ranging from 40 to 80 in the highest block groups and as low as 20 to 40 in the southern and eastern areas of the community. Further, the southernmost portion of Lomita’s has the farthest proximity. The sites identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory are located in those areas with highest proximity to employment opportunities and public transit, to give those without a vehicle better access to employment. When comparing the jobs proximity index to Figure 4, White Majority Tracts, populations with fewer white individuals, in the southeast of the City, experience lower proximity to jobs. And the area shown to have a median income of $125,000 or more in Figure 7 has moderate proximity to employment.

Similar to poverty rates and median income, the cities west of Lomita enjoy high economic scores while cities to the east experience lower domain scores. However, cities to the east, west, and south experience low proximity to employment scores while the communities to the north experience higher index scores (Figure 14a).

Figure 13: Economic Domain Score
Page | 28 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *640
Figure 13a: Regional Economic Domain Score
Figure 14: Jobs Proximity Index
Page | 29 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *641
Figure 14a: Regional Jobs Proximity Index
Transportation
Lomita is served by local bus lines that run along Pacific Coast Highway, Crenshaw Boulevard, Lomita Boulevard, and Narbonne Avenue. All sites identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory as accommodating the lower-income housing need are identified along these bus routes to increase mobility opportunities, especially for lower- and extremely low-income households.

Additionally, the City sponsors a taxicab program for older adults and residents of Lomita with a disability. Service is provided on a round-the-clock basis to and from any point within the service area and the six satellite points. Residents 65 years of age and older or persons with a disability of any age are eligible. The service area covers all of Lomita, extends outside of the City’s limits, and is limited to trips originating and terminating in the area between Hawthorne Boulevard and Vermont Avenue, between Sepulveda Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, and where the City boundary crosses over Pacific Coast Highway. Figure 15 shows the service area for this program.

Page | 30 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *642
Figure 15: Dial-A-Ride
Page | 31 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *643
Healthy Environment
Lomita’s environmental domain score represents more positive environmental outcomes throughout the City. Figure 16 shows that Lomita ranks between 0.75 and 1.0. This score is consistent throughout the Census tracts and there is little disparity across the City. The communities to the west of Lomita enjoy higher environmental scores, while the cities to the east experience lower scores (Figure 16a).

Figure 16: Environmental Domain Score
Page | 32 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *644
Figure 16a: Regional Environmental Domain Score
Disparities in Access to Opportunity for Persons with Disabilities As discussed previously, the percentage of residents reporting a disability in Lomita is less than 20 percent in three Census tracts in the City, with the remaining Census tract less than 10 percent. Further in 2019, 27 percent of those with a disability in Lomita were made up of adults age 65 years and older. As the population ages, mobility among older adults can become increasingly limited. The Sites Inventory of the Housing Element identifies capacity along the City’s mixed-use corridors, increasing opportunities for future residents to access public transit and to reach needed services without reliance on automobiles. Program 19 of the Housing Element aims to increase opportunities for accessibility in housing for those with a disability.

Findings
As shown in this section, Lomita has moderate to high access to opportunity throughout the City. Therefore, there is a weak relationship between disparities in access to opportunities and population subgroups. Those sites identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory have been identified in those areas with close proximity to employment, education, services, and other resources to capitalize on the existing mixed-use corridors and the opportunities offered by the area. The mixed-use areas of the City offer increased opportunities for mobility via walking and bicycling for those who wish to take advantage of the central location near all needed amenities and resources Lomita has to offer. Further the mixed-use areas provide access for those who rely on public transit and for those who rely on an automobile.

Page | 33 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *645
Local Knowledge
Although Lomita is connected by local bus lines and residents are well connected within the City, there is a lack of regional coordination and collaboration to invest in transportation that would bring high frequency transit to the City. Local data from Center for Neighborhood Technology indicates that approximately 74 percent of households in the City spend 22 percent to 26 percent of their income on transportation costs alone.1 The City falls with the higher indices at 18 percent to 22 percent and 22 percent to 26 percent of household income spent on transportation costs. The lack of regional transportation creates a high car dependency and increased transportation costs for Lomita residents which is notable through the City’s burdensome parking standards. The parking standards are a constraint to residential development; particularly, for multifamily development as the requirement to provide garage parking or enclosed parking for multifamily units is costly and difficult for developers to achieve (refer to Appendix C, Constraints Analysis for analysis of parking standards).

Disproportionate Housing Needs, Including Displacement
Homeownership is the largest asset of most households in the U.S. and, for many households, provides an opportunity to build wealth. Over generations, many households have used wealth gained through homeownership to send their children to college or invest in other opportunities, creating access to more wealth. One of the most prevalent consequences of residential segregation is the intergenerational inaccessibility of homeownership. In 2019, approximately 47 percent of Lomita’s occupied housing stock was owner-occupied and approximately 53 percent was renter-occupied. Additionally, approximately 25 percent of homeowners in Lomita are of Hispanic origin, who may be of any race or multiple races. While White households make up approximately 57 percent of the population, they make up nearly 71 percent of total owner-occupied housing units. Figure 17 below shows the race of homeowners in Lomita.
1 Center for Neighborhood Technology. (n.d.). The H+T index provides a more complete measure of affordability. H+T Affordability Index. https://htaindex.cnt.org/map/
Page | 34 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *646
Figure 17: Race/Ethnicity of Homeowners

6.0%

9.5%
White
Black or African American 0.4%
American Indian and Alaska
Native

16.6% Asian
Native Hawaiian and Other

61.3% Pacific Islander

0.2%

5.9%
Some other race
Two or more races
Cost Burden
According to the Federal government, rental housing is considered “affordable” if the people living there pay no more than 30 percent of their income for rent or mortgage. The renter cost burden in the City can be seen in Figure 18, with 20 to 80 percent of the population within the given Census tract who are cost burdened. Figure 19 shows that homeowners in Lomita are less cost burdened by their housing costs, representing 20 to 60 percent of the population.

In 2019, approximately 51 percent of rental households in Lomita spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing, while approximately 37 percent of homeowner households with a mortgage spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing; 33 percent of all homeowner households do not have a mortgage. As rents continue to rise, outpacing median income, more rental households will continue to be burdened by housing costs, leaving homeownership further out of reach for many. Renter and owner cost burden is extremely prevalent throughout the region (Figures 18a and 19a).

Page | 35 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *647
Figure 18: Renter Cost Burden
Figure 18a: Regional Renter Cost Burden
Page | 36 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *648
Figure 19: Homeowner Cost Burden
Figure 19a: Regional Homeowner Cost Burden
Page | 37 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *649
Overcrowding
Overcrowding is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as a housing unit occupied by more than one person per room. A severely overcrowded household is defined as one with more than

1.5 persons per room. As shown in Figure 20, those overcrowded households in Lomita are located in the eastern middle portion of the City, ranging from 12 to 15 percent; the rest of the City is less than the statewide average of 8.2 percent. Further, as shown in Figure 21, all of Lomita falls in the lowest category at or below 5 percent. To the east of the City of Lomita, neighboring cities experience far greater levels of overcrowding and severe overcrowding (Figures 20a and 21a).

Lower rates of overcrowding may lead to more positive health outcomes. For example, studies have shown that there is a strong correlation between crowded households and the probability of COVID-19 infection.2 In particular, crowded households provide less opportunities for a person infected with COVID-19 to isolate themselves from the rest of the household.3 When comparing the overcrowded households tract map to Figure 4, White Majority Tracts, it appears the populations with fewer White individuals, in the southeast of the City, experience higher rates of overcrowding.

Figure 20: Overcrowded Households
2 3
Columbia University Irving Medical Center. 2020. “Crowded Homes, Poor Neighborhoods Linked to COVID-19.” June 18, 2020. https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/crowded-homes-poor-neighborhoods-linked-covid-19.

Botts, J., and L. Bénichou. 2020. “The neighborhoods where COVID collides with overcrowded homes.” CalMatters. June 12, 2020, Updated June 26, 2020. https://calmatters.org/projects/california-coronavirus-overcrowded-neighborhoods-homes/.

Page | 38 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *650
Figure 20a: Overcrowded Households in the Region
Figure 21: Severely Overcrowded Households
Page | 39 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *651
Figure 21a: Severely Overcrowded Households in the Region Substandard Housing
Table 1, Households with Any of Four Housing Problems, shows the percentage of households in Lomita experiencing any one of four housing problems (lack of complete kitchen facilities, lack of complete plumbing facilities, more than one person per room, and monthly housing costs exceeding 30 percent of monthly income) by Census tract. Further, Table 1 provides a breakdown of the households with housing problems by race or ethnicity.

Generally, minority households are also more likely to experience higher rent burdens, poor housing conditions, and an increased risk of displacement and/or homelessness. White, nonHispanic households across the region and in each jurisdiction are the least likely to experience housing problems, while Black and Hispanic households experience housing problems at the highest rates (e.g., cost burden, overcrowding). However, as shown in Table 1, the percentage of households with any of the four problems does not vary greatly in different parts of the City. Similarly, race and ethnicity are generally consistent in their distribution throughout the City. It is noted that Census Tract 67001 has the lowest Black, non-Hispanic population and Native American, non-Hispanic population, and has the fewest housing problems. Figures 22 and 22a show the percentages across the City and region.

Lomita falls in the 20 to 40 percent range. Only to the west are there households with fewer than four of the housing problems outlined above.

Page | 40 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *652
Table 1. Households with Any of Four Housing Problems
Census Tract
Code
Percentage of
Households with
Housing
Households with Housing Problems by Race/Ethnicity
White, NonHispanicBlack, NonHispanicNative Asian/Pacific Hispanic America, Islander, NonProblems

39.22%

47.1%

43.92%

45.94%
Non-Hispanic

0.21%

0.5%

0.3%

0.42%
Hispanic

15.37%

13.01%

14.85%

16.1%
670001
670003
670002
670100

46.72%

47.84%

38.74%

41.67%

1.81%

2.7%

4.05%

6.63%

31.74%

32.07%

37.74%

31.24%
Source: HUD AFFH Mapping Tool 2020. https://egis.hud.gov/affht/.

Figure 22: Percent of Households with Any of Four Housing Problems Page | 41 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *653
Figure 22a: Percent of Households with Any of Four Housing Problems in the Region
Displacement
Displacement is an event that occurs for various reasons, including investment, disinvestment, or even disasters. Gentrification, or the influx of capital and higher-income residents into working-class neighborhoods, is often associated with displacement, which occurs when housing costs or neighborhood conditions force people out and drive rents so high that lower-income households are excluded from moving into the area.

According to the Urban Displacement Project, a research collaboration between UC Berkeley and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), the City of Lomita includes Census tracts that are “at risk of becoming exclusive.” Those areas that are at risk of becoming exclusive include moderate to high-income areas that exhibit specified risk factors for future exclusion of lower-income households, are shown in Figure 23. Those risk factors in Lomita include high concentrations of moderate, mixed-moderate, mixed-high, or high-income households; tracts where housing is primarily affordable to middle, high, mixed moderate, and mixed high-income households; and tracts with significant increases in housing costs. Housing in Lomita is affordable to middle, high, mixed moderate, and mixed high-income households.

Although segregated living patterns are not evident within the City’s boundaries, higherincome households in Lomita can make adjacent neighborhoods more vulnerable to gentrification, influencing segregation at the regional level.

Page | 42 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *654
Figure 23: Gentrification and Displacement Map
Investment-Driven Displacement
Lomita has a relatively high concentration of mobile home parks, as shown in Figure 24.

Redevelopment of these properties could leave lower-income households displaced. The City is committed to protecting and assisting these communities, and Program 3 of the Housing Element demonstrates that commitment through the adoption of an ordinance detailing regulations and procedures for any proposed conversion of an existing mobile home park to mitigate the adverse impacts on the housing supply. Compared to its surrounding communities, Lomita hosts far more mobile home parks than any neighboring city (Figure 24a).

Page | 43 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *655
Figure 24: Mobile Home Parks
Figure 24a: Mobile Home Parks in the Region
Page | 44 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *656
Disaster-Driven Displacement
Lomita’s greatest disaster-related safety risks include air pollution, extreme heat, and seismic hazards. People with existing health conditions, such as asthma and heart disease, are more sensitive to air pollution. These conditions are also often caused by living near sources of air pollution. The average rate of asthma-related emergency department visits is between 30 to 46 people per 10,000 visits; however, this average increases to between 46 and 72 people per 10,000 visits in the area of Lomita between State Route 1 and West Lomita Boulevard.

Additionally, people who spend more time outdoors, including young children, people who work outdoors, and people in households without cars, are often exposed to polluted air at higher rates.

People can be adversely affected by extreme heat if they have existing health conditions or spend increased time outdoors working, commuting, or playing. People who depend on walking, biking, or transit to get around; older adults; and young children are at risk for heat stroke. Specifically, residents of the downtown area are less likely to own a car and are more likely to walk, bike, or take public transportation to work. This means they often spend more time outdoors during heat waves when doing important daily errands.

No populations are specifically more at risk because of an earthquake, but low-income households may be more likely to live in older non-retrofitted homes.

Identification and Prioritization of Contributing Factors Fair Housing Issues and Contributing Factors
Although Lomita is a racially and ethnically diverse city with high access to opportunity, low rates of poverty, and fairly low rates of household overcrowding, some homeowners and renters struggle with housing overpayment. Rates of overpayment by renters is higher than those of homeowners. Additionally, three of the City’s four Census tracts has 10 to 20 percent of the population with a disability. While these percentages of those with a disability is not especially high, the City wants to be proactive in addressing the future needs of an aging population as it relates to changing levels of ability. Further, the City recognizes that to better meet the needs of lower-income households and those with disabilities, planning and land use decisions must consider opportunities for these populations to have improved access to resources and upward mobility. For these reasons, the City has identified the need for affordable housing, the need for accessible housing, and carefully considered land use and planning decisions to be the top priorities, in this order, for the City to affirmatively further fair housing. While there appears to be no threat from community opposition, lack of regional cooperation, or lack of funding sources, the Housing Element’s programs address each of these potential concerns if indeed they become constraints to housing development in the future.

Page | 45 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *657
Prioritization of Contributing Factors and Actions Designed to Meaningfully Address Contributing Factors
The City’s priorities for addressing impediments to fair housing issues are identified as follows:

1. Affordable Housing. Between 39 percent and 47 percent of households experience housing problems, such as cost burden or overcrowding. The low availability of housing options to meet the needs of lower-income households is a key factor contributing to the City’s risk of becoming exclusive. Because of this, the production of housing for lower-income, especially extremely low-income, households to meet a range of housing needs is a priority for the City. Housing Element Program 3, to provide assistance to mobile home park tenants; Program 4, to preserve the affordability of housing units; and Program 10, to provide permit streamlining for affordable housing developments, aim to directly assist with the realization of affordable housing. Specifically, Program 14 increases densities along the City’s key corridors to facilitate the production of lower-income housing in an area with high access to resources, and Program 30 will capture some of this new density specifically for affordable housing through the adoption of an inclusionary housing ordinance.

Other programs that more broadly demonstrate the City’s commitment to affordable housing include Program 7, to provide a range of incentives to facilitate the development of affordable housing, and Program 27, to reduce parking requirements, especially for affordable housing.

2. Accessible Housing. In 2019, approximately 11 percent (2,198) of the City’s population had a disability, and approximately 27 percent of those age 65 and older had a disability. Because older adults make up the largest subgroup of those with a disability, as older adults continue to age, the need for housing to meet varying levels of ability will become increasingly vital. The Housing Element identifies actions to help meet the changing needs of the population. Housing Element Program 6, to incentivize affordable accessory dwelling units; Program 13, to reduce development standards for senior housing and housing to assist those with special needs; Program 14, to increase density in areas with high access to opportunity; and Program 19, to better connect developers and residents to resources related to housing accessibility, aim to assist in increasing housing for the aging population and those with disabilities.

3. Land Use and Planning Decisions. Land use and planning decisions can influence and restrict needed housing opportunities. Historical low-density development, although a result of the once agricultural nature of the community, established early patterns of development that still exist today, creating an imbalance of single-family development as compared to multifamily development. As further described in Appendix B, 60% of all units in Lomita consist of single unit attached and detached houses, whereas those units with two or more make up approximately 35 percent of the housing stock. Those sites identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory have been identified in those Page | 46 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *658
areas with close proximity to employment, education, services, and other resources to capitalize on the existing mixed-use corridors and the opportunities offered by the area. The mixed-use areas of the City offer increased opportunities for mobility via walking and bicycling for those who wish to take advantage of the central location near all needed amenities and resources Lomita has to offer. Further, the mixed-use areas provide access for those who rely on public transit, as well as for those who rely on an automobile. Those who have the greatest need to be less reliant on automobiles can greatly benefit by the level of accessibility that the mixed-use areas provide due to proximity to resources. Housing Element Program 14 increases densities along the City’s key corridors to facilitate the production of multifamily housing, especially housing for lower-income households, in an area with high access to resources, including retail, shopping, recreation, and public transit. Additionally, because most of the City is located in a high-resource opportunity area, Program 15 increases density in established single-family neighborhoods to increase opportunities for homeownership and upward mobility for those entering the housing market.

Further, programs that increase opportunity for new development within lowerdensity zones include Program 6, Accessory Dwelling Units, where the City will incentivize the production of ADUs that may be made affordable to lower- and moderate-income households as well as households with disabilities; and Program 15, Supporting Low Density, where the City will develop objective development and design standards to provide ministerial processing for lot splits in single-family zones to increase capacity in lower-density neighborhoods.

4. Community Opposition to Affordable Housing. The City of Lomita has not experienced opposition to the development of affordable housing in its neighborhoods. Community activists understand that the community is in need of more affordable housing types and solutions, and Lomita’s residents and businesses are in support of identifying solutions to solving housing issues. The Lomita Chamber of Commerce participated in the first community workshop for the 6th Cycle update, demonstrating support from the local business community and recognizing the interconnectedness of housing availability and a healthy local economy. Further, a recent ballot initiative was approved by the voters, demonstrating community support for solutions to meet the needs of those experiencing homelessness. After being approved by voters in March 2017, Measure H went into effect in 2018, raising the sales tax countywide by one-quarter percent to raise money for homeless services, suggesting county-wide support for affordable housing solutions such as increasing the supply of supportive and interim housing for people experiencing homelessness locally. Finally, the comments received through the Housing Element update process indicate a strong willingness from the community to address the local housing needs, as further detailed in Appendix F. Through Program 22 of the 6th Cycle Housing Element, the City will continue to contract fair housing services through the HRC Page | 47 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *659
where they conduct fair housing education and outreach for the City, as further detailed in the Housing Element Programs section. Through Program 23 of the Housing Element, the City will create fair housing marketing guidance for use by developers to ensure that housing marketing materials are representative, as further detailed in the Housing Element Programs section. Through Programs 20 and 21 the City will continue to send information out to residents within the City’s newsletters on the availability of housing assistance programs. Further, through Program 19, as a part of the City’s housing resources webpage, they will connect residents and developers on accessibility guidance through resources such as home retrofit guides. As further detailed in the programs of the Housing Element, the outreach that will be conducted through implementation of the Housing Element will elevate the conversation around fair housing and housing affordability, and garner further community support around housing solutions.

5. Housing Discrimination. Discriminatory housing policy and practices of landlords can be a major threat to individuals or families seeking permanent housing, especially those with special needs or accommodations. Figure 25, Discrimination Cases (Total, 2020), shows that the County experienced a low-moderate amount of housing discrimination complaints. At the City level, HUD’s Office of FHEO data indicated that there were 12 inquiries reported from 2013-2021 one of which was for disability discrimination. Most inquiries were report as “None.” All inquiries were dismissed due to failure to respond, no valid basis or decision not to pursue. Nevertheless, program in the Housing Element aim to address potential issues of housing discrimination by enforcing and promoting access to fair housing materials and resources including, Program 22 which will support fair housing practices; Program 23 will support developers in the production of fair housing marketing materials; and Programs 7, 8, 9, 13, and 27 commit the City to removing constraints to development to better facilitate the development of housing for all, including those with special needs and extremely low-income households.

6. Land Use and Zoning Laws. Approximately 50 percent of the City of Lomita consists of single-family detached residential uses. Due to its built-out nature, opportunities for housing exist primarily through redevelopment. To remedy this situation and facilitate a more streamlined context for affordable housing developers, the City will implement the following programs:
• Through Program 6, Accessory Dwelling Units, the City will provide an incentive for accessory dwelling units that can be offered as affordable. Accessory dwelling units can provide opportunities for those with special needs, such as older adults or those with disabilities, including developmental disabilities, by creating housing in an independent setting while still allowing for support from caregivers who reside on the same lot.

Page | 48 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *660
• Through Program 7, Incentives and Regulations, the City will pair rezones with objective development standards to incentivize the production of housing and will offer incentive zoning that will increase developer interest in the State Density Bonus Program. •
•
•
•
Through Program 10, Affordable Housing Streamlining, the City will provide process streamlining for qualifying affordable and mixed-income housing developments.

Through Program 11, Objective Design Standards, the City will develop objective design standards to be paired with future rezones.

Through Program 12, Lot Consolidation, the City will enhance incentives for lot consolidation beyond what is already offered to developers.

Through Program 14, Rezone Program, the City will enforce a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, will mandate a minimum of 50 percent of the total square footage be dedicated to residential uses, and will permit exclusively residential uses. • Through Program 16, No Net Loss, the City will monitor the housing capacity identified in the Adequate Sites Inventory throughout the planning period to maintain sufficient capacity for the remaining Regional Housing Needs Allocation at all income levels. •
•
Through Program 27, Reduced Parking Requirements, the City will reduce parking requirements for multifamily housing and for religious institutions when affordable housing is provided.

Through Program 29, Ongoing Code Updates, the City will continue to monitor changes to State legislation and update the Zoning Code as needed and will continue to coordinate with developers in facilitating ideas on process and procedural improvements. • Through Program 30, Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, the City will evaluate the feasibility of an inclusionary housing ordinance and adopt said ordinance, which will further incentivize the use of the State Density Bonus program.

7. Lack of Regional Cooperation. The City continues to participate in Countywide housing assistance programs. However, lengthy Section 8 and publicly owned affordable housing waiting lists are indicators that there are not enough resources to meet the needs of all residents in the region and in Lomita. The City is committed to connecting residents to available housing assistance programs, as detailed in Programs 20 and 21, where the City will continue to send information out to residents within the City’s newsletters on the availability of housing assistance programs. In addition, the City will work with local stakeholders to identify process modifications and potentially new incentives through Program 7 of the Housing Element.

8. Lack of Affordable Housing and Lack of Public or Private Investment in Areas of Opportunity. Affordable housing developers rely on State tax credits to make their developments financially feasible. To be competitively rewarded credits, the developers must identify areas of opportunity as it relates to access to resources, which includes all areas of Lomita. However, due to Lomita’s completely built-out nature, affordable housing developers must seek out development opportunities that can exist through the redevelopment of sites. Additionally, the lack of regional cooperation and investment (public or private) to bring high frequency transit in the City increases car dependency for Lomita residents as is reflected in current parking Page | 49 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *661
standards which impede multifamily residential development, particularly, for market rate housing. To make redevelopment feasible for affordable housing developments and development in general, as demonstrated in Program 14 of the Housing Element, the City will implement a rezone to increase density on identified sites to allow up to 30 dwelling units per acre. Further, through Program 12, the City will enhance incentives for lot consolidation beyond what is already offered to developers. Program 26 will make it easier for affordable housing developers to navigate the regulatory environment, and Program 10 will provide an expedited process for affordable housing developments. Program 12 incentivizes lot consolidation, further incentivizing redevelopment that will result in an increase in residential uses in areas in close proximity to commercial services, serving the needs of future residents. Programs related to continued participation in Countywide assistance, such as Programs 4, 20, 21, and 24, will assist the facilitation of affordable housing development and continue to support the City’s most vulnerable populations. The City is increasing opportunities for upward mobility, or “access to opportunity,” by facilitating the production of affordable housing, connecting residents to financial resources, and supporting homeownership opportunities through Program 15, by increasing capacity in existing single-family neighborhoods, and Program 20, to support with homeownership to increase the financial security of its current and future residents. Additionally, Housing Element Programs 22 and 23 were developed to further demonstrate the City’s commitment to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing through increasing fair housing awareness, continuing to contract fair housing services, and continuing to participate and engage in the Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice.

Page | 50 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *662
Figure 25: Discrimination Cases (Total, 2020)
Meaningful Programs and Actions
The City is committed to affirmatively further fair housing and will address the fair housing issues and contributing factors identified through this analysis through meaningful programs and actions. Table 1, Contribution Factors to Fair Housing builds on the programs identified to address contributing factors of fair housing in the previous section and provides specific program and action types tied to the fair housing issue and contributing factor. Through Program 21 the City will pursue a goal of 50% of Housing Choice Vouchers in higher Page | 51 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *663
opportunity areas and through Program 6 the City will pursue a goal of 10 ADUs in higher opportunity areas by mid-cycle.

Page | 52 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *664
Table 2: Contributing Factors to Fair Housing
Page | 53 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *665
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor(s) Meaningful Programs/ Action Type Program Metric Disproportionate Housing . Program 3 Metrics:

Needs, Including Displacement
Risk
. The availability of affordable units in
a range of sizes
The low availability of housing options to
meet the needs of lower-income
households is a key factor contributing
to the City’s risk of becoming exclusive.

Programs and Metrics in the Housing
Element aim to address this factor by
protecting existing residents from
displacement through the preservation
of current affordable housing and
creating new housing choices through
incentives to increase the production of
new affordable housing.
. Land use and zoning laws
Approximately 50 percent of the City of
Lomita consists of single-family
residential uses. Due to its built-out
nature, opportunities for housing exist
primarily through redevelopment. To
remedy this situation and facilitate a
more streamlined context for affordable
housing developers through programs in
the Housing Element that aim to
. Action Type: Protecting Existing
Residents from Displacement
Program 3, Mobile Home Park
Regulations
Program 4, Lower-Income Housing
Preservation
. Action Type: New Housing Choices and
Affordability in Areas of Opportunity
Program 6, Accessory Dwelling Units
Program 7, Incentives and Regulations
Program 10, Affordable Housing
Streamlining
o Require replacement of 100% of units of
applicable projects.
o Require relocation assistance to protect
tenants from displacement risk.
. Program 4 Metrics:
o Track changes in ownership, management,
and status of deed-restrictions to monitor deedrestricted units. . Program 6 Metrics:
o Incentivize the production of 24 ADUs
affordable to lower-income households during
the planning period, 10 of which should be
targeted in higher opportunity areas by midcycle.

Program 12, Lot Consolidation
Program 14, Rezone Program
Program 27, Reduced Parking
Requirements . Program 7 Metrics:
o Create City will pair rezones with objective
development standards to incentivize the
production of housing and will offer incentive
zoning that will increase developer interest in
the State Density Bonus Program.
. Program 10 Metrics:
o Require staff is knowledge in amended
procedures to ensure SB 35 projects are
streamlined
incentivize housing development and
rezone for higher densities.
. Program 12 Metrics:
o Develop an incentive program for lot
consolidation beyond what is already
offered to developers for qualifying sites
identified in the Sites Inventory Form.
. Program 14 Metrics:
o Increase residential densities on rezone sites to
remove barriers to development and create
opportunities for new housing supply and
affordability near higher opportunity areas.
. Program 27 Metrics:

Page | 54 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *666
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor(s) Meaningful Programs/ Action Type Program Metric o
o
Create affordable housing opportunities by
amending zoning code to allow for reduced
parking requirements in exchange for
affordable housing.

Disparities in Access to
Opportunity for Persons with
Disabilities
. Lack of affordable, accessible
housing in range of unit sizes
. Action Type: New Housing Choices and . Program 6 Metrics:

Affordability in Areas of Opportunity
Program 6, Accessory Dwelling Units
Program 13, Zoning Revisions for Special
Needs Housing
Program 19, Accessibility
o Provide new housing opportunities for those
with special needs, such as older adults or
those with disabilities, including developmental
disabilities, by creating housing in an
independent setting while still allowing for
support from caregivers who reside on the
same lot through ADUs.

Older adults make up the largest
subgroup of those with a disability, as
older adults continue to age, the need
for housing to meet varying levels of
ability will become increasingly vital.

Programs in the Housing Element aim to
address the need for accessible housing
by creating new housing choices in
areas of opportunity through ADUs,
zoning revisions for special needs
housing, and resources related to
housing accessibility.
. Program 13 Metrics:
o Amend the Zoning Code to provide a process
by which large residential care facilities with
seven or more residents may be developed in
commercial, residential, and mixed-use zones
with objectivity and certainty to increase areas
where housing for special needs groups,
including older adults, can be built.
o
o
Reduce development standards for Senior
Planned Unit Developments through the
adoption of a reduction in parking requirements
and a reduction in minimum unit size
requirements.

Remove the major Reasonable
Accommodation process and analyze the
Planning Commission hearing as a constraint.
. Program 19 Metrics:
o Enforce accessibility requirements through
development approvals throughout the
planning cycle to proactively enhance
accessibility in new construction.
o Create a housing resources webpage that
connects developers and residents to
accessibility resources, such as home retrofit
guides and universal design standards that can
increase in-unit accessibility.

Page | 55 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *667
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor(s) Meaningful Programs/ Action Type Program Metric Disparities in Access to
Opportunity
. Location and type of affordable
housing
. Action Type: Place-based Strategies to . Program 1 Metrics:

Encourage Community Conservation
and Revitalization
o Assist in rehabilitation of 5 households annually
Sites identified in the Housing Element throughout the 2021–2029 planning period.

Sites Inventory have been identified in
those areas with proximity to
employment, education, services, and
other resources to capitalize on the
existing mixed-use corridors and the
opportunities offered by the area. To
further support the new housing choices
in areas of opportunity, programs in the
Housing Element aim to identify
Program 1, Housing Rehabilitation Grant
Program
. Action Type: New Housing Choices and
Affordability in Areas of Opportunity
Program 14, Rezone Program
. Program 14 Metrics:
o Prioritize rezone in areas with access to
amenities such as recreation, services,
education, and other needs to promote housing
supply, choices and affordability in areas of
Program 15, Supporting Low Density high opportunity.
. Program 15 Metrics:
o Facilitate the production of housing that may
. Action Type: Housing Mobility
Strategies
provide new housing choices and
homeownership opportunities by reviewing the
need for an ordinance to implement the
provisions of SB 9 to establish ministerial
review procedures for proposed lot splits of
existing single-family residential lots.
additional density through a rezone and
through regulatory incentives to support
missing middle housing.

Program 20, Homebuyer Assistance
Program
Program 21, Section 8 Housing Choice
. Lack of Regional Cooperation Voucher Program
Section 8 and publicly owned affordable
housing lengthy waiting lists are
indicators that there are not enough
resources to meet the needs of all
residents in the region and in Lomita.

Through Programs in the Housing
Element the City will aim to incentive
housing mobility strategies.
. Program 20 Metrics:
o Ensure 100% of inquiries for homeowner
assistance resources receive information
materials.
. Program 21 Metrics:
o Provide 70 Section 8 vouchers annually and target
50% of Housing Choice Vouchers in higher
opportunity areas.

Fair Housing Enforcement and
Outreach Capacity
. Lack of resources for fair housing
agencies and organizations
The City of Lomita has not experienced
opposition to the development of
. Action Type: New Housing Choices and . Program 19 Metrics:

Affordability in Areas of Opportunity o Increase opportunities for in-unit accessibility by connecting developers and residents to
accessibility resources.

Program 19, Accessibility
. Action Type: Housing Mobility
affordable housing in its neighborhoods.

Community activists understand that the
community is in need of more affordable
housing types and solutions, and
Lomita’s residents and businesses are in
support of identifying solutions to solving
housing issues. As part of identifying
solution, Fair Housing Enforcement and
Strategies
Program 20, Homebuyer Assistance
Program
Program 21, Section 8 Housing Choice
Voucher Program
Program 22, Fair Housing
. Program 20 Metrics:
o Ensure that web material use best practices
for affirmatively marketing and promoting
equal access for Lomita residents to Los
Angeles County Development Authority
homebuyer assistance programs.
. Program 21 Metrics:

Page | 56 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *668
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor(s) Meaningful Programs/ Action Type Program Metric Outreach efforts to understand housing
issues are included through programs in
the Housing Element.

Program 23, Fair Housing Development
Marketing
. Action Type: Protecting Existing
Residents from Displacement
Program 24, Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice
o Update City website to create a housing
resources page that connects residents,
developers, non-profits, property owners, and
other interested parties to relevant information
including landlord education on source of
income discrimination and voucher programs.
. Housing Discrimination
Discriminatory housing policy and
practices of landlords can be a major
threat to individuals or families seeking
permanent housing, especially those
with special needs or accommodations.

The City experienced a low-moderate
amount of housing discrimination
complaints consistently throughout the
City. The City recognizes the importance
of educating residents and developers to
reduce housing discrimination in the City
and has included programs to
. Program 22 Metrics:
o Increase resources for fair housing agencies by
requiring annual staff trainings on how to refer
complaints and inquiries to HRC.

Regional coordinate with HRC to gather and
analyze local fair housing data collected
annually.
o
. Program 23 Metrics:
o Develop and promote marketing material
standards for the sale and rental of housing is
compliant with housing discrimination laws.

Include updated fair housing information in the
City’s monthly newsletters.
disseminate the information.
o
. Program 24 Metrics:

Maintain an Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice.
o
Disparities in Access to
Opportunities/Disproportionate
Housing Needs, Including
Displacement Risk
. Lack of Affordable Housing/ Lack of
Public or Private Investment in Areas
of Opportunity
Affordable housing developers rely on
State tax credits to make their
developments financially feasible. To be
competitively rewarded credits, the
developers must identify areas of
opportunity as it relates to access to
resources, which includes all areas of
Lomita. However, due to Lomita’s
completely built-out nature, affordable
housing developers must seek out
development opportunities that can exist
through the redevelopment of sites.
. Action Type: New Housing Choices and . Program 11 Metrics:

Affordability in Areas of Opportunity
Program 11, Objective Design Standards
Program 12, Lot Consolidation
Program 14, Rezone Program
Program 28, Rezone Opportunities
. Action Type: Housing Mobility
Strategies
Program 18, Surplus Lands
o Ensure 100% of development standards
established through the City rezone (Program
14) are objective to increase transparency and
certainty in the development process.
. Program 12 Metrics:
o Establish additional lot consolidation incentives
to qualifying sites identified in the Sites
Inventory Form.
. Program 14 Metrics:
o Create opportunity for at least 271 units, 99 of
which are affordable for lower-income
households through the rezoning efforts.
. Program 18 Metrics:

Page | 57 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *669
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factor(s) Meaningful Programs/ Action Type Program Metric Through programs in the Housing
Element, the City will rezone with
increased density to make
o Prioritize 100% of surplus sites for the
development of affordable housing to connect
developers who are interested in building more
affordable homes to surplus local public land
that is both available and suitable for affordable
housing development.
redevelopment feasible for affordable
housing developments. Through this
effort, the City is increasing opportunities
for upward mobility, or “access to
opportunity,” by facilitating private
investment through the production of
affordable housing, connecting residents
to financial resources, and supporting
homeownership opportunities in areas of
opportunity.

Page | 58 Appendix D
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *670
Appendix E:

Adequate Sites Analysis
Contents
Appendix E: Adequate Sites Analysis....................................................................................................1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................3 Regional Housing Needs Allocation..................................................................................................4 Capacity Analysis...................................................................................................................................5 Small Sites...........................................................................................................................................5 Development Permit Activity..........................................................................................................6 Realistic Capacity...............................................................................................................................9 Accessory Dwelling Units...................................................................................................................10 Vacant Sites..........................................................................................................................................12 Underutilized Sites...............................................................................................................................13 Current Development that is Credited Toward RHNA.................................................................15 Total Capacity Identified and Credit Toward RHNA.....................................................................16 Sites Identified to be Rezoned..........................................................................................................19 Sites Existing Uses...........................................................................................................................22 Consolidated Sites Existing Uses..................................................................................................28 Fair Housing .........................................................................................................................................66 Access to Opportunity ...................................................................................................................66 Segregation and Integration.........................................................................................................68 Racial Demographics......................................................................................................................68 Disproportionate Housing Needs................................................................................................70 Fair Housing Conclusions..............................................................................................................71 Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................................73 Programs to Support Development of Underutilized Sites ....................................................73 Page | 1 Appendix E
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *671
Figures
Figure 1: Housing Element Sites Identified – Existing Capacity..........................................................18 Figure 2: Housing Element Sites Identified – Rezone Capacity.........................................................21 Figure 3: TCAC Opportunity Map............................................................................................................. 67 Figure 4: Diversity Index..............................................................................................................................69 Figure 5: Median Income............................................................................................................................ 70 Figure 6: Renter Overpayment...................................................................................................................71 Tables
Table 1: Recent Development Permit Activity...........................................................................................6 Table 2: Recent ADU and JADU Development.......................................................................................11 Table 3: ADU Potential to Credit Toward RHNA....................................................................................11 Table 4: Vacant Sites.....................................................................................................................................12 Table 5: Vacant Site Capacity .....................................................................................................................12 Table 6: Identified Capacity for Underutilized Sites..............................................................................15 Table 7: CBSP Units to Credit Toward RHNA.........................................................................................16 Table 8: Total RHNA Compared to Credits and Capacity Identified................................................17 Exhibit
Sites Inventory Form
Page | 2 Appendix E
Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Reg CC MTG, Page *672
Introduction
As provided under State law, the Housing Element must include an inventory of land suitable and available for all types of residential development, including vacant sites and non-vacant sites, having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the local housing need at all income levels. As further detailed in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) discussion below, every local government is assigned a number of housing units representing its share of the State’s housing needs for an 8-year period. The City of Lomita’s (City) housing need for the 6th Cycle 8-year period (2021 to 2029) consists of 829 total units. Through the Adequate Sites Inventory for the 2021–2029 planning period, the City has identified capacity for 354 total units through vacant sites, underutilized sites, and projected accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Further, the City has identified 220 total units to be credited toward the RHNA. To meet the remaining RHNA by income category, the City has identified areas to be rezoned to not only meet its housing need, but to ensure adequate capacity throughout the planning period. The identified capacity is met through several methods, including in the form of currently vacant sites available for housing development; identified underutilized sites available for development at higher densities with realistic development potential; the development of housing that is underway and will have Certificates of Occupancy issued within the planning period; the potential for ADUs and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs); and sites identified for a rezoning program.

← All documents from this meeting