Long Beach City Council
February 8, 2022

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-13
FAppendix
January 2022
The proposed housing element update includes important
programs and outcome measures and benchmarks
designed to ensure city policies and programs continue
to make progress towards addressing fair housing
issues shown in the data and raised by the community.

For example, through consistent advocacy, from the
2012 Downtown Plan to the 2016 Mayor’s Affordable/
Workforce Housing Taskforce and the 2021 adoption of an inclusionary housing policy, these important requirements for affordable housing to be included in market rate
developments are now in place in the Downtown and
Midtown Plan areas where the vast majority of new
housing has been developed in recent years. The Housing Element includes a program to continue monitoring
the policy and to consider expanding the requirement
citywide once sufficient evidence is available to support such a requirement pursuant to state law (see program 6.7).

Monitoring the impacts of the newly adopted Enhanced
Density Bonus program (2.1) and micro-unit pilot program (program 2.5)

4.Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach
The Fair Housing Foundation (FHF) provides fair housing services to southern Los Angeles County jurisdictions
including Long Beach. FHF provides services related
to discrimination complaint intake and investigation,
education and outreach, and general housing services.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development
The mission of the Office of Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity (FHEO) is to eliminate housing discrimination, promote economic opportunity, and achieve diverse,
inclusive communities by leading the nation in the
enforcement, administration, development, and public
understanding of federal fair housing policies and laws.

FHEO offers the following programs:
» Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP): The Fair
Housing Initiatives Program provides funding to public
and private organizations that develop programs that
are designed to prevent or eliminate discriminatory
housing practices.
» Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP): The Fair
Housing Assistance Program strengthens nationwide
fair housing efforts by helping individual State and
local governments administer laws of their own that are consistent with the Federal Fair Housing Act.
» Economic Opportunities (Section 3): The Section 3
program requires that recipients of certain HUD financial assistance, to the greatest extent possible, provide job training, employment, and contract opportunities for
low or very low income residents in connection with
projects and activities in their neighborhoods.

Fair Housing Act Enforcement Activity
HUD investigates complaints of housing discrimination
based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or familial status. At no cost to the complainants, HUD will investigate the complaint and try to conciliate the matter with both parties. According to the City’s 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), from January 1, 2010 to March 8, 2016, 135 fair housing complaints in Long Beach were filed with HUD. Overall, disability-related discrimination (51 allegations), familial status discrimination (37 allegations), and race discrimination (37 allegations) were the most
commonly reported issues.

Among the 135 complaints filed, 112 complaints have been closed, with 23 complaints still under investigation. The disposition of these 112 closed complaints was as follows:
» 60 complaints were determined to have no probable
cause
» 23 complaints withdrawn by the complainants or closed due to lack cooperation from the complainants
» 23 complaints reached were successfully bought to
conciliation or settlement
» 3 complaints dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
» 2 complaints received FHAP judicial dismissal
» 1 complaint received Fair Housing Assistance Program
(FHAP) judicial consent order
California Department of Fair Employment and
Housing
The mission of the Department of Fair Employment and
Housing (DFEH) is to protect Californians from employment, housing and public accommodation discrimination, and
hate violence. To achieve this mission, DFEH keeps track of and investigates complaints of housing discrimination, as well as complaints in the areas of employment, housing, public accommodations and hate violence.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-14
Appendix
F
January 2022
State Fair Housing Laws Enforcement Activities
According to the City’s 2017 AFH, between 2010 and 2015, 132 fair housing complaints in the City of Long Beach
have been filed with DFEH. Most of these complaints (50 complaints) involved disability, followed by national origin (39 complaints) and familial care (16 complaints).

Fair Housing Foundation
Since 1969, the City of Long Beach has contracted with the Fair Housing Foundation to affirmatively further fair housing through a comprehensive fair housing program. The Fair Housing Foundation (FHF) was founded in Long Beach
in 1964 by a diverse group of residents who organized
against Proposition 14, a state ballot initiative seeking to nullify California’s fair housing laws. For 50 years, FHF has operated a private, nonprofit, education agency dedicated to promoting the enforcement of fair housing laws and
encouraging an atmosphere of open housing regardless of the protected classes of age, arbitrary, color, familial status, gender, gender identity, marital status, mental disability, national origin, physical disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, or source of income. The mission of FHF is “Dedicated to eliminating discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone. ” The services offered by FHF and provided for the City of Long Beach are described below.

Discrimination Complaint Intake and Investigation
Federal and State fair housing laws prohibit discrimination in the sale, rental, lease, negotiation, insurance, or financing of housing based on race, religion, sex, marital status, familial status, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, source of income or other arbitrary reason. FHF provides fair housing services to tenants, home-seekers and housing providers, which include:
» Responding to discrimination inquiries and complaints - screening and counseling
» Documenting discrimination complaints - opening fair
housing cases
» Investigating discrimination complaints - extensive
testing
» Resolving discrimination complaints - conciliation,
mediation, administrative agency referrals, and litigation According to the 2017 AFH, from April 1, 2010 through
March 31, 2015, FHF received 849 complaints alleging
housing discrimination in Long Beach. Consistent with
recent statewide trends, the top three discrimination
biases are physical disability 389 (46 percent), followed by race 154 (18 percent), and familial status 95 (11 percent).

Persons of low and very low income accounted for 782
(92 percent) of discrimination complaints. Racially, Black residents reported for 345 (41 percent) of complaints,
White residents reported for 248 (29 percent), and Hispanic residents, within ten race categories, reported for 198 (23 percent) complaints.

Not every allegation of housing discrimination results
in a fair housing case. After thoroughly screening and counseling the 849 complaints, FHF opened 375 bona
fide fair housing cases. Consistent with recent statewide trends, the top three discrimination biases were physical disability (41 percent), race (22 percent), and familial status (14 percent). Racially, Black residents accounted for 166 complaints (44 percent), White residents made
100 complaints (27 percent), and Hispanic residents
reported 83 complaints (23 percent). Persons of low
and very low income accounted for 347 (93 percent) of
discrimination complaints. Issues concerning disability have also remained steadily the largest area of fair housing complaints annually and resulting at 41 percent of all
complaints over that time period.

FHF conducted 632 investigations on the 375 cases, utilizing 11 forms of investigations. Depending upon numerous
variables, including allegation and prior complaints, an individual case may only utilize one type of investigation or multiple types of investigations. Of all cases investigated, FHF found evidence of discrimination in 133 cases (36
percent).

Nearly 25 percent of the cases with evidence of
discrimination closed as successfully conciliated resulting from both the complainant and respondent agreeing
to a resolution; two percent of those were resolved with a monetary settlement recovered for the complainants
when the cases were filed in State and Federal Courts. Of the remaining cases, three percent were either referred to an attorney for litigation, to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), or the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-15
FAppendix
January 2022
General Housing (Tenants and Landlords) Services
FHF counsels tenants, landlords, and housing providers on their rights and responsibilities, which includes:
» Responding to general housing inquiries - screening
and counseling
» Documenting general housing inquiries - maintaining
data on every client, the problem and the resolution
» Resolving general housing inquiries - counsel, pursue habitability cases, provide unlawful detainer assistance, conduct mediations, and provide appropriate referrals
FHF provides a comprehensive, extensive and viable
education and outreach program. The purpose of this
program is to educate tenants, landlords, owners, Realtors, and property management companies on fair housing
laws; to promote media and consumer interest; and to
secure grass roots involvement within communities which includes:
» Increasing public awareness - participating in
community and school events, attending conventions,
providing staff and information at trainings, staffing
clinics, and media exposure
» Conduct training sessions for consumers - conducting
two-hour Tenant Workshops, staffing booths, and
conducting community presentations
» Conducting training sessions for housing providers -
conducting two-hour Landlord Workshops, four-hour
Certificate Management Trainings, and Realtor trainings FHF specifically targets outreach to the persons and
protected classes that are most likely to encounter housing discrimination. The types of activities conducted fall into the follow four basic categories:
» Increase Public Awareness: FHF has developed new,
dynamic, and more effective approaches for bringing
fair housing information to residents, including
brochures that focus on specific fair housing issues.
» Training Sessions to Consumers: FHF provides fair
housing training opportunities throughout the City.

Trainings to housing consumers include:
» Tenant Workshops: A two-hour training that
generally covers an overview of fair housing laws,
leases and notices, rules and regulations, a tenant’s
obligations, and guidelines and specific concerns
regarding families with children, occupancy
standards, and discrimination rules.
» Booths: Staff booths and provide fair housing
literature at every opportunity available. Typically,
fair housing booths are staffed at community centers,
fairs, festivals, youth centers, colleges, trade shows, and carnivals.
» Presentations: A scheduled synopsis of fair housing
services and statistics to staff and employees of the
City or community-based organizations.
» Services for Housing Providers: Trainings are
provided to landlords, managers, realtors, and other
housing providers:
– Landlord Workshops: A two-hour training that
covers an review of fair housing laws, rental
process, selection criteria, rental agreement,
rules and regulations, obligations, and guidelines
regarding late fees, security deposit, rent
increases, and termination. The training also
covers specific concerns regarding families with
children, occupancy standards, and reasonable
accommodations and modifications.
– Certificate Management Trainings: A four-hour
training that gears toward property owners,
managers, management companies, and real
estate professions. Agenda includes a review
of federal and state fair housing laws, general
guidelines, housing for families with children,
people with disabilities, advertising guidelines,
sexual harassment, prohibited practices, and hate
crimes.
– Realtor Trainings: A four-hour training that
includes a summary of fair housing laws, general
guidelines, policies and practices, equal treatment
needs and examples, and guidelines to showing
properties.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-16
Appendix
F
January 2022
Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative Findings
on Fair Housing Issues
On May 25, 2020, George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, was killed by four Minneapolis Police Officers. The incident was captured on video for the world to see. Across the
nation, including in Long Beach, people took to the
streets in public outcry to condemn the violence and
racial inequities that have systematically and historically impacted Black people. On June 9, 2020, the Long Beach
City Council engaged in an earnest conversation about
racism as a public health crisis, the need to restore public trust in City government, and how to reconcile a gap in the experiences of impacted and vulnerable people with
current City policies, especially the Black community. The City Council called upon City staff to prepare a report that would put the City Council in a position to enact culture and system change.

Followed by a formal resolution, on June 23, 2020, Long Beach City Council unanimously adopted a Framework
for Reconciliation which contains four key steps to ending systemic racism:
» Acknowledging the existence and long-standing
impacts of systemic racism in Long Beach and the
country;
» Listening to accounts and experiences of racial injustice, inequity, or harm to community members; and
» Convening stakeholders to analyze feedback from
the listening sessions and racial disparity data to
recommend initiatives that shape policy, budgetary,
charter, and programmatic reform;
» Catalyzing action that includes immediate, short-term, medium-term, and long-term recommendations for the
City Council’s consideration.

On August 11, 2020, the Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative Team delivered an Initial Report summarizing their findings after two month of community engagement.

City data on racially disparate data related to housing included the following findings:
» 25% of Black residents are homeowners, which is half
the White homeownership rate
» Black women have the highest rate of rent burden,
which is defined as paying more than 30% of their
income on rent
This data was contextualized by local knowledge
summarized after a rigorous community engagement
process, including thirteen listening sessions, four town halls, and a community survey, resulting in feedback from over 1,500 individuals.

The Community Survey found that housing discrimination
is the number one way survey respondents reported
having experienced racism in Long Beach. The number
one survey response for how the City can foster economic inclusion was to increase affordable housing and legal
protections for Black people and people of color. The
community expressed concern for Long Beach residents
who were facing eviction due to limited public policy that protects tenants. Many community members believed
newer housing developments are marketed towards a
higher socioeconomic class while receiving tax breaks
and subsidies that benefit developers but not low-income renters. This has resulted in gentrification and the
displacement of low-income residents who are more likely to be people of color.

Community members also raised the problem of
environmental racism and a history of inequitable
development in the City. Long Beach communities in
the northwestern and southwestern portions of the City
are burdened by a high concentration of pollutants,
exacerbating health conditions in neighborhoods
disproportionately populated by people of color.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-17
FAppendix
January 2022

5. Integration and Segregation
Race and Ethnicity
Ethnic and racial composition of an area is useful in
analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing
concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size, locational preferences, and mobility.

This is particularly important given the ways race and
racism have shaped housing, development patterns and
segregation in Long Beach. The City is home to a diverse array of racial and ethnic groups, including distinct
communities of Mexican, Central/South American, African American, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, Samoan,
Vietnamese, Guamanian, Chamorro, Cambodian, Laotian,
and Hmong descent. Despite the City’s diversity, the
historic racial segregation of neighborhoods still persists today. The formerly redlined areas of the City, particularly in Central and West Long Beach, are still disproportionately represented by communities of color today.

Conversely, as in cities throughout Southern California, areas developed in the post-World War II area, resulted in a significant expansion of new residential areas in
the City (in the case of Long Beach achieved through
annexation of adjacent farmland), was influenced by
exclusionary practices, despite a Supreme Court ban on
deed restrictions banning the sale or rental of properties to non-whites in 1948. The development of lower-density, more suburban and predominantly white East Long Beach
neighborhoods during the post-World War II era occurred through these processes of annexation, restrictive zoning and exclusionary practices including the widespread use of racial covenants. Even as Long Beach was transformed by waves of immigration during the mid- to late-20th century, restrictive covenants, zoning laws and implicit racial bias in the homebuying process have perpetuated racial and
economic segregation to the present day.

According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 72 percent of the Long Beach population belongs to a racial or ethnic minority group, a slight increase from 70.6 percent during the 2006-2010 ACS. According to the AFH, persons of
Mexican, Guatemalan, and Salvadoran national origin
appear to be concentrated in western and central parts
of the City just south of the Pacific Coast Hwy, and in North Long Beach just above 48th Street. Residents who
are Limited English Proficient (LEP) may face additional challenges with becoming integrated throughout more
varied areas in the City. With limited English language abilities, they face potential barriers to employment and adequate housing, which may dictate where they may
choose or be able to settle and locate. Residents who
have the most limited abilities to read, speak, write or understand English, are concentrated in western parts of the City, primarily north of Downtown and Central Long
Beach, and to a lesser extent North Long Beach and the
Westside. Reflective of the City’s overall demographics, the majority of these individuals speak Spanish (15 percent), Khmer (two percent), and Tagalong (one percent). All LEP residents, regardless of language spoken at home, are
notably concentrate in these areas.

HUD tracks racial or ethnic dissimilarity trends for Long Beach and the Los Angeles County region. Dissimilarity
indices show the extent of distribution between two
groups, in this case racial/ethnic groups, across census tracts. The following shows how HUD views various levels of the index:
» <40: Low Segregation
» 40-54: Moderate Segregation
» >55: High Segregation
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-18
Appendix
F
January 2022
The indices for Long Beach and Los Angeles County Region from 1990 to 2020 are shown in Table F-1. Dissimilarity between non-White and White communities in Long Beach
and throughout the Los Angeles County region has actually worsened since 1990. In Long Beach, dissimilarity between all non-White and White communities has also worsened.

Based on HUD’s definition of the various levels of the index, segregation between Asian or Pacific Islander/White Long Beach and Los Angeles County communities is moderate,
while segregation between non-White/White, Black/White, and Hispanic/White communities is high.

Ethnic and racial composition of a region is useful in
analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing
concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size, locational preferences, and mobility. Figure F-1 compared racial
or ethnic minority concentrations in 2010 and 2018. In
a majority of the northern, central, and western tracts, racial/ethnic minorities account for over 81 percent of the population. The tracts on the eastern end of the City have lower concentrations of racial/ethnic minority populations, though the concentration has increased in several tracts since 2010.

Table F-1: Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index
1990 2000 2010 2020
Long Beach
Non-White/White 53.14 57.5 55.84 58.13
Black/White 56.98 58.56 57.39 59.93
Hispanic/White 55.15 61.04 59.28 60.54
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 52.37 53.19 50.08 53.81 Los Angeles County
Non-White/White 56.66 56.72 56.55 58.53
Black/White 73.04 67.4 64.99 68.24
Hispanic/White 60.88 63.03 63.35 64.33
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 46.13 48.19 47.62 51.59 Source: HUD AFFH Database, 2020.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-19
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-1: (A) Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentrations (2010) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-20
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-1: (B) Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentrations (2018) Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2010-2014 & 2015-2019 ACS, 2021 Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-21
FAppendix
January 2022
Disability
According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 10.2
percent of Long Beach residents experience a disability, compared to 9.9 percent Countywide. Since the 2008-2012 ACS, the disabled population in Long Beach has increased slightly from 10 percent, but decreased throughout the
County (9.4 percent). As shown in Figure F-2 Census tracts with a high percentage of persons with disabilities are more concentrated in the south western section of the
City surrounding the Port of Long Beach. The percentage of persons with disabilities in this area has increased since 2010.

Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of children under the age of 18, regardless of whether the child is biologically related to the head of household, or the martial status of the head of households. Families with children may face housing discrimination by landlords who fear that children will cause property damage. Some landlords may have
cultural biases against children of the opposite sex sharing a bedroom. Differential treatments such as limiting the number of children in a complex or confining children to a specific location are considered fair housing concerns.

Approximately 31 percent of Long Beach households have
one or more child under the age of 18. The City’s share of households with children is lower than the County
(33 percent), and the neighboring cities of Carson (36.4 percent), Cerritos (32.6 percent), Compton (49.9 percent), and Lakewood (37.3 percent), but the same as Torrance (31 percent).

Single parent households are also protected by fair housing law. Approximately 7.4 percent of households in the City are single-parent households. Female-headed households
with children require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care, health care, and other supportive
services. Over 6 percent of households in Long Beach are single female-headed households with children. As shown in Figure F-3 and Figure F-4 the eastern side of the City has higher concentrations of children in married couple households, while the tracts in the southwestern section of the City have higher concentrations of children in female- headed households.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-22
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-2: (A) Concentration of Persons with Disabilities (2010-2014)

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-23
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-2: (B) Concentration of Persons with Disabilities (2015-2019) Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2010-2014 & 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-24
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-3: Percent of Children in Married Couple Households Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-25
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-4: Percent of Children in Female-Headed Households Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-26
Appendix
F
January 2022
Income
Identifying low- or moderate-income (LMI) geographies and individuals is important to overcome patterns of segregation.

HUD’s 2013-2017 CHAS data (Table F-2) shows that 51.6 percent of Long Beach and Los Angeles County Households earn 80 percent or less than the area median family income and are considered lower income. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, the median household income in Long Beach is $63,017, lower than $68,044 for the County.

Table F-2: Income Level Distribution
Income Category
Long Beach Los Angeles County
Households Percent Households Percent
<30% HAMFI 32,590 19.8% 641,055 19.5%
31-50% HAMFI 24,055 14.6% 482,070 14.6%
51-80% HAMFI 28,575 17.3% 578,285 17.5%
81-100% HAMFI 17,495 10.6% 312,595 9.5%
>100% HAMFI 62,285 37.7% 1,281,195 38.9%
Total 165,000 100.0% 3,295,200 100.0%
Source: HUD AFFH Database, 2020.

Figure F-5 shows the Lower and Moderate Income (LMI)
areas in the City by census tract. HUD defines a LMI area as a census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI. Tracts with higher LMI populations are most concentrated in the central and northern sections of the City, where LMI households account for 75 to 100 percent of the total population.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-27
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-5: Concentration of LMI Households
Source: HCD Data Viewer, HUD LMI Database, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-28
Appendix
F
January 2022

6. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas
of Poverty
Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Poverty
(R/ECAPs)
In an effort to identify racially/ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), HUD has identified census tracts with a majority non-White population (greater than 50 percent) with a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever threshold is lower. According to HUD’s 2020 R/ ECAP mapping tool based on the 2009-2013 ACS, there
are currently 13 R/ECAPs in Long Beach. These R/ECAPs
are shown in Figure F-6 below. These areas include tracts in the City’s Westside, South Wrigley, Sunrise and Central neighborhoods. R/ECAP areas are generally distributed
south of Wardlow Road and west of Redondo Avenue, but
are also located in northern Long Beach in the Carmelitos neighborhood (Census Tract 5716) and one other is located in Southeast Long Beach, partially in the City’s Southeast Area Specific Plan area. However, the R/ECAP located in the City’s southeast area is a wetland with no residential population.

Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Affluence (RCAAs)
While racially concentrated areas of poverty and segregation (R/ECAPs) have long been the focus of fair housing
policies, racially concentrated areas of affluence (RCAAs) must also be analyzed to ensure housing is integrated,
a key to fair housing choice. A HUD Policy Paper defines racially concentrated areas of affluence as affluent, White communities. According to this report, Whites are the most racially segregated group in the United States and “in the same way neighborhood disadvantage is associated with
concentrated poverty and high concentrations of people
of color, conversely, distinct advantages are associated with residence in affluent, White communities. ” Based on their research, HCD defines RCAAs as census tracts where 1) 80 percent or more of the population is white, and 2) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national median household income
in 2016).

Figure F-7 shows predominantly White populations by
census tract and Figure F-8 shows median income by
block group. The eastern, southern, and southwestern
areas of the City tend to have larger populations of White residents. Several of the block groups in the eastern side of the City also have median incomes exceeding $125,000.

White predominant areas in the center of the City also have higher median incomes compared to the surrounding
areas.
1Goetz, Edward G., Damiano, A., & Williams, R. A. (2019) Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence: A Preliminary Investigation. ’ Published by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research (21,1, 99-124).

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-29
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-6: Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Note- this map has been updated by the City to reflect the most recent RECAPs which were not available in HCD Data Viewer

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-30
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-7: White Predominant Areas
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2021.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-31
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-8: Median Income
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-32
Appendix
F
January 2022

7. Access to Opportunities
HUD developed an index for assessing fair housing by
informing communities about disparities in access to
opportunity based on race/ethnicity and poverty status.

Table F-3 shows index scores for the following opportunity indicator indices (values range from 0 to 100):
» Low Poverty Index: The higher the score, the less
exposure to poverty in a neighborhood.
» School Proficiency Index: The higher the score, the
higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood.
» Labor Market Engagement Index: The higher the
score, the higher the labor force participation and
human capital in a neighborhood.
» Transit Trips Index: The higher the trips transit index, the more likely residents in that neighborhood utilize
public transit.
» Low Transportation Cost Index: The higher the
index, the lower the cost of transportation in that
neighborhood.
» Jobs Proximity Index: The higher the index value, the better access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood.
» Environmental Health Index: The higher the value, the better environmental quality of a neighborhood
In Long Beach, Hispanic residents were most likely to be impacted by poverty, low school proficiency, low labor
market participation, and fewer accessible employment
opportunities. White residents in Long Beach and
throughout the County were least likely to be exposed to poverty. White residents also had the greatest access to high quality school systems and the highest labor market participation rates in both the City and County.

Long Beach residents, regardless of race or ethnicity, had better access to transit and lower transportation costs than residents Countywide. Long Beach has significantly lower environmental health indices for all racial/ethnic groups and income levels than the County.

In the City, those Long Beach foreign-born residents
originating from Mexico, the Philippines, or Cambodia
typically reside in areas with the lowest school proficiency index scores. They are also located in areas in the City that reflect the lowest job proximity index scores and therefore the least access to employment, and also generally reside in areas with low index scores for labor force engagement.

According to the AFH those of Mexican, Cambodian, and
Guatemalan national origin reside in areas that have high scores for transit trips and also for low transportation cost.

The majority of the foreign-born population found in the City of Long Beach, regardless of national origin, is located in the City’s areas with the lowest poverty index scores (highest areas of poverty). Notable also is a correlation between high concentrations of minority residents and
high levels of poverty in the City.

Access to proficient schools is particularly important to a community with high proportions of families with
children. In Long Beach, families with children may be
facing additional hardships in obtaining quality education.

According to the AFH, 60 to 100 percent of households
in areas that generally received low scores in the school proficiency index (less than 50 index points) are families with children. The highest performing schools in Long
Beach are located in parts of the City with the fewest
children.

When comparing household access to employment centers
and engagement in the labor force based on familial status, large proportions of households with children reside in areas with the lowest index scores.

Census tracts with a high percentage of families with
children are also areas that receive high index scores for transit trips and high index scores for low transportation cost. This could reflect a trend that family households with children prioritize access to public transportation when locating in the City.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-33
FAppendix
January 2022
Table F-3: HUD Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity Low
Poverty
School
Proficiency
Labor
Market Transit
Low
Transportation
Cost
Jobs
Proximity
Environmental
Health
Long Beach Total Population
White,
Non-Hispanic 64.67 65.78 66.41 89.24 79.21 37.61 0.94
Black,
Non-Hispanic 32.09 41.60 32.99 92.02 83.39 36.91 1.31
Hispanic 30.69 41.23 31.19 92.01 82.72 35.55 1.05
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic

40.91 46.69 37.55 90.45 80.45 37.35 1.21
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 41.89 48.67 45.33 91.58 82.65 37.67 0.98
Long Beach Population below federal poverty line
White,
Non-Hispanic 51.18 54.65 56.68 91.19 83.09 38.75 0.74
Black,
Non-Hispanic 21.70 38.71 24.12 93.51 85.58 37.11 1.12
Hispanic 19.45 35.82 23.30 93.61 85.16 37.24 0.70
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic

29.08 42.78 31.64 92.42 83.67 31.44 0.71
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 23.43 38.32 25.28 92.62 84.98 34.08 1.13
Los Angeles County Total Population
White,
Non-Hispanic 62.59 65.09 65.41 82.63 74.09 55.80 18.99
Black,
Non-Hispanic 34.95 32.37 34.00 87.70 79.18 40.13 11.66
Hispanic 33.91 38.38 33.18 87.19 77.74 41.53 11.91
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic

53.57 59.34 55.94 86.52 76.45 51.82 12.16
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 45.04 46.90 44.50 83.17 75.65 44.24 16.74
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-34
Appendix
F
January 2022
Low
Poverty
School
Proficiency
Labor
Market Transit
Low
Transportation
Cost
Jobs
Proximity
Environmental
Health
Population below federal poverty line
White,
Non-Hispanic 50.68 57.49 58.06 86.42 79.48 57.52 16.66
Black,
Non-Hispanic 23.45 25.52 27.16 88.65 81.18 36.59 11.62
Hispanic 23.66 27.66 32.87 89.45 81.02 42.84 10.30
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic

42.97 50.06 54.52 89.62 81.49 54.19 9.84
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 29.85 32.02 35.12 85.23 78.70 46.35 16.01
Source: HUD AFFH Database, 2020.

To assist in this analysis, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) convened in the California Fair Housing Task Force (Task Force) to “provide research, evidence-based policy recommendations, and other strategic recommendations to HCD and other related state agencies/ departments to further the fair housing goals (as defined by HCD). ” The Task force has created Opportunity Maps to identify resources levels across the state “to accompany new policies aimed at increasing access to high opportunity areas for families with children in housing financed with 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs)” . These opportunity maps are made from composite scores of three different domains made up of a set of indicators. Based on these domain scores, tracts are categorized as Highest Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty. Table F-4 shows the full list of indicators.

Table F-4: Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps Domain Indicator
Environmental CalEnviroScreen 3.0 pollution Indicators and values Economic
Poverty
Adult education
Employment
Job proximity
Median home value
Education
Math proficiency
Reading proficiency
High School graduation rates
Student poverty rates
Poverty and Racial Segregation
Poverty: tracts with at least 30% of population under federal poverty line Racial Segregation: Tracts with location quotient higher than 1.25 for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or all people of color in comparison to the County Source: CA Fair Housing Task Force, Methodology for TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, December 2020.

Table F-3: HUD Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity (continued) Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-35
FAppendix
January 2022
Opportunity map scores for Long Beach census tracts are presented in Figure F-9 . Approximately 20.9 percent of tracts in the City are characterized as Highest Resource,

15.5 as High Resource, 22.7 as Moderate Resource, 2.7
percent as Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing), 16.4
percent as Low Resource, and 14.5 percent as areas of High Segregation and Poverty. The remaining 7.3 percent were not calculated. A majority of the tracts in the eastern section of the City are highest resource areas. The western section of the City is made up of moderate and low resource areas and areas of high segregation and poverty.

Economic
As described previously, the Fair Housing Task Force
calculates economic scores based on poverty, adult
education, employment, job proximity, and median home
values. According to the 2021 Task Force maps presented in Figure F-10, tracts with the lowest economic scores are most concentrated in the southwestern and northern
sections of the City. There are a few tracts with low
economic scores scattered throughout the eastern side of Long Beach, however generally the eastern section of the City has higher economic scores.

Education
As described above, the Fair Housing Task Force determines education scores based on math and reading proficiency, high school graduation rates, and student poverty rates.

Areas with lower education scores, shown in Figure F-11, are generally concentrated in the southwestern section of the City near the Port of Long Beach. The tracts with the lowest education scores in the eastern section of the City also have the lowest economic scores (see Figure F-10 ).

Generally, the eastern side of the City has higher education scores compared to the rest of Long Beach.

Environmental
Environmental health scores are determined by the Fair
Housing Task Force based on CalEnviroScreen 3.0 pollution indicators and values. Figure F-12 shows that the south - western section of the City has the highest concentration of tracts with the lowest environmental score. A few tracts along the northern and eastern City border also have the lowest environmental scores.

Transportation
Availability of efficient, affordable transportation can be used to measure fair housing and access to opportunities.

SCAG developed a mapping tool for High Quality Transit
Areas (HQTA) as part of the Connect SoCal 2020-2045
Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities
Strategy (RTP/SCS). SCAG defines HQTAs as areas within
one-half mile from a major transit stop and a high-quality transit corridor. Figure F-13 shows that most of Long
Beach, with some gaps in coverage on the east side, North Long Beach and Southeast Long Beach is considered an
HQTA. As discussed previously, Long Beach also scored
higher than the County average in access to transit and low transportation cost (see Table F-3).

HUD’s Job Proximity Index, described previously, can be used to show transportation need geographically. Block
groups with lower jobs proximity indices are located
further from employment opportunities and have a higher need for transportation. As shown in Figure F-14, census block groups surrounding the Port and Airport have the
greatest access to employment opportunities, while the
eastern and northern sections of the City have least access to employment opportunities.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-36
Appendix
F
January 2022
Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.

Figure F-9: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Composite Score

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-37
FAppendix
January 2022
Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.

Figure F-10: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Economic Score

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-38
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-11: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Education Score
Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-39
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-12: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Environmental Score Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-40
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-13: High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs) - 2045
Source: SCAG HQTA Database, 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), 2021.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-41
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-14: HUD Jobs Proximity Index Score by Block Group Source: HCD Data Viewer, HUD Opportunity Indicators, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-42
Appendix
F
January 2022

8. Disproportionate Housing Needs
Housing problems for Long Beach were calculated using
HUD’s 2020 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data based on the 2013-2017 ACS. Table F-5 breaks down households by race and ethnicity and presence of
housing problems for Long Beach and Los Angeles County
households. The following conditions are considered
housing problems:
» Substandard Housing (incomplete plumbing or kitchen
facilities)
» Overcrowding (more than 1 person per room)
» Cost burden (housing costs greater than 30%)
In Long Beach, 36.5 percent of owner-occupied households and 58.6 percent of renter-occupied households have
one or more housing problem. The City had a slightly
lower proportion of households with a housing problem
compared to the County, where 39.9 percent of owner-
occupied households and 62.3 percent of renter-occupied households experience a housing problem. In Long
Beach, Hispanic renters experience housing problems at
the highest rate (67.4 percent), while White owners had the fewest instances of housing problems (29.2 percent).

Black, Asian, American Indian, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic households all have housing problems above the City
average for both owner and renter households.

Table F-5: Housing Problems by Race/Ethnicity
With Housing Problem White Black Asian Am. Ind Pac. Isldr. Hispanic Other All Long Beach Total Population
Owner-Occupied 29.2% 45.5% 42.4% 49.5% 42.7% 46.0% 37.7% 36.5% Renter-Occupied 48.9% 59.3% 55.3% 59.3% 55.2% 67.4% 48.9% 58.6% Los Angeles County
Owner-Occupied 32.1% 41.5% 38.3% 39.7% 39.7% 48.2% 36.5% 38.9% Renter-Occupied 52.6% 63.7% 56.3% 56.4% 55.5% 71.1% 55.7% 62.3% Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.

Cost Burden
Cost burden by tenure based on HUD CHAS data is shown
in Table F-6 . American Indian and Black non-Hispanic
renter-households have the highest rate of cost burden.

Cost burden amongst owner-households, regardless of
race or ethnicity, is lower than renter-households. White, non-Hispanic owner-occupied households have the lowest
instance of cost burden Citywide.

Figure F-15 compares overpayment by tenure over time
using the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 ACS. Overpayment
for homeowners has generally remained constant, though
it has decreased in several tracts in the south central and eastern section of the City. Overpayment by renters has also increased in some tracts Citywide, but also has generally remained the same since the 2010-2014 ACS. There are
no areas of the City where overpayment has significantly decreased.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-43
FAppendix
January 2022
Table F-6: Cost Burden by Race/Ethnicity
Cost Burden (>30%) Severe Cost Burden (>50%) Total HHs
Owner-Occupied
White, non-Hispanic 28.3% 12.3% 34,955
Black, non-Hispanic 42.6% 17.3% 5,995
Asian, non-Hispanic 33.9% 11.7% 8,025
Amer. Ind, non-Hispanic 52.3% 25.0% 220
Pacific Isldr., non-Hispanic 29.5% 15.9% 220
Hispanic 35.8% 16.2% 15,295
Other 37.0% 11.3% 1,285
Renter-Occupied
White, non-Hispanic 45.7% 25.5% 29,140
Black, non-Hispanic 55.1% 31.2% 16,890
Asian, non-Hispanic 44.4% 23.0% 11,305
Amer. Ind, non-Hispanic 55.8% 19.8% 430
Pacific Isldr., non-Hispanic 43.6% 14.5% 860
Hispanic 54.5% 28.0% 37,640
Other 42.5% 21.5% 2,740
Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-44
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure B-15: (A) Overpayment by Owners (2010-2014)

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-45
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure B-15: (B) Overpayment by Owners (2015-2019)

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-46
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-15: (C) Overpayment by Renters (2010-2014)

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-47
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-15: (D) Overpayment by Renters (2015-2019)
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2010-2014 & 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-48
Appendix
F
January 2022
Overcrowding
Table F-7, below, shows that approximately 6.2 percent of owner-occupied households and 16.8 percent of renter-
occupied households in Long Beach are overcrowded. The
proportion of overcrowded households is slightly higher than but similar to the County, where 5.7 percent of owner- occupied households and 16.7 percent of renter-occupied households are overcrowded.

Table F-7: Overcrowding by Tenure
Overcrowded
(>1 person per room)
Severely Overcrowded
(<1.5 persons per room) Total HHs
Households % Households %
Long Beach
Owner-Occupied 4,080 6.2% 1,190 1.8% 66,000
Renter-Occupied 16,640 16.8% 7,775 7.9% 99,000
Los Angeles County
Owner-Occupied 85870 5.7% 23025 1.5% 1,512,365
Renter-Occupied 298460 16.7% 134745 7.6% 1,782,835
Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.

Figure F-16 and Figure F-17 show the concentration
of overcrowded and severely overcrowded households
by census tract. Overcrowded households are most
concentrated in tracts located in the central and
northern sections of the City. Similarly, tracts with higher concentrations of severely overcrowded households are
also located in the central areas of the City.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-49
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-16: Concentration of Overcrowded Households
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2020 HUD CHAS Data, 2021.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-50
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-17: Concentration of Severely Overcrowded Households Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2020 HUD CHAS Data, 2021.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-51
FAppendix
January 2022
Substandard Housing
Incomplete plumbing or kitchen facilities can be used to measure substandard housing conditions. In Long Beach,

0.3 percent of owner-occupied households and 2.2 percent of renter-occupied households lacked complete plumbing
or kitchen facilities, fewer compared to the County
(Table  F-8).

Housing age can also be used as an indicator for substandard housing and rehabilitation needs. Homes may begin to
require major repairs or rehabilitation at 30 to 40 years of age. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 82.3 percent of the housing stock in Long Beach was built prior to 1980 and may be susceptible to deterioration, compared to 74.3 percent Countywide.

Based on data collected by the City’s Code Enforcement
Bureau, only 8 properties that have been inspected since the beginning of 2020 were deemed substandard and in
need of actual replacement, a rate of 0.001%.

Table F-8: Substandard Housing Conditions
Lacking Complete Plumbing or Kitchen Facilities
Total HHs
Households %
Long Beach
Owner-Occupied 204 0.3% 66,000
Renter-Occupied 2,145 2.2% 99,000
Los Angeles County
Owner-Occupied 6,850 0.5% 1,512,365
Renter-Occupied 50,030 2.8% 1,782,835
Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.

Displacement Risk
HCD defines sensitive communities as “communities [that] currently have populations vulnerable to displacement
in the event of increased development or drastic shifts in housing cost. ” The following characteristics define a vulnerable community:
» The share of very low income residents is above 20%;
and
» The tract meets two of the following criteria:
– Share of renters is above 40%,
– Share of people of color is above 50%,
– Share of very low-income households (50% AMI or
below) that are severely rent burdened households is
above the county median,
– They or areas in close proximity have been
experiencing displacement pressures (percent
change in rent above County median for rent
increases), or
– Difference between tract median rent and median
rent for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in county (rent gap).

HCD has identified vulnerable communities in the northern and central sections of the City ( Figure A-18). These areas also have higher concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities, LMI households, overpaying households, and overcrowded
households.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-52
Appendix
F
January 2022
Source: HCD Data Viewer, Urban Displacement Project, 2021.

Figure F-18: Sensitive Communities At-Risk of Displacement

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-53
FAppendix
January 2022

9. Summary of Fair Housing Issues
C. Sites Inventory
AB 686 requires the sites identified to meet the RHNA to be consistent with its duty to affirmatively further fair housing and the findings in this fair housing assessment. Figure F-19 shows the City’s Sites Inventory and R/ECAPs located within the City boundaries. The sites identified to meet the RHNA are generally dispersed throughout the City.

Figure F-20 shows the compares the acreage of R/ECAPs
in the City and the acreage of sites used to meet the City’s RHNA with respect to R/ECAPs. Approximately 8 percent
of the City is considered a R/ECAP , while 14 percent of the acreage identified to meet the RHNA are located in
R/ECAPs. This is in part because most of the R/ECAPs are also located along the City’s major transportation corridors where higher- intensity transit-oriented development
would be appropriate and is facilitated by the City’s land use regulations, consistent with state law for reducing carbon emissions, SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategies.

Table F-9 shows the distribution of RHNA units by income category, both within and outside R/ECAPs. Most units
allocated to meet the City’s RHNA are in tracts that are not considered a R/ECAP; only 11.6 percent of units are located within R/ECAPs. There are fewer lower income units located in R/ECAPs (8.6 percent), compared to moderate
income units (23.5 percent) and above moderate income
units (13.2 percent). The City’s RHNA strategy does not disproportionately locate new lower income units in
existing areas of racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs).

Figure F-20: Distribution of City and Sites Inventory Area by R/ECAPs area in r/ecaparea in r/ecap area not in r/ecap
site inventory % of totalcity % of total
area not in r/ecap
15%
9%
85%91%
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-54
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-19: Sites Inventory and R/ECAPs

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-55
FAppendix
January 2022
Table F-9: Distribution of RHNA Units by R/ECAP Tract
R/ECAP (Tract) Lower Income Units Moderate-Income Units Above Moderate- Income Units
All RHNA
Units
R/ECAP 8.6% 23.5% 13.2% 11.6%
Not a R/ECAP 91.4% 76.5% 86.8% 88.4%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
(RTP/SCS), and planning best practices. Introducing new development in these areas in conjunction with expanded tenant protections would infuse private investments in
these neighborhoods and have the potential to facilitate neighborhood improvements while minimizing the risk of
displacing existing residents.

Figure F-21 shows the Sites Inventory by TCAC Opportunity Area. As described above, a majority of the eastern side of the City is highest or high resource, while the western section of the City is a mix of moderate and low resource areas and areas of high segregation and poverty. Most of the sites identified are located on the western side of the City.

Figure F-22 shows the breakdown of sites by TCAC
Opportunity Area. Highest and high resource areas make
up approximately 26 percent and 16 percent of the
City’s geography. However, only 12 percent of the sites identified are in highest resource areas and 13 percent are in high resource areas. Conversely, 32 percent of sites are located in moderate resource or moderate resource
(rapidly changing) tracts, while these tracts make up only 16 percent of the City’s geography. Low resource areas
account for 11 percent of the City, but 22 percent of the sites inventory. Approximately 6 percent of the City’s
geography is classified as an area of high segregation and poverty, but 14 percent of the sites inventory is located within these tracts.

Table F-10 shows the breakdown of site inventory units
by income category and TCAC Opportunity Area score. A
larger proportion of lower income units (61.8 percent) are in highest, high, or moderate resource, including rapidly changing, tracts compared to moderate income units (49.6 percent) and above moderate income units (36 percent).

Further, 19.1 percent of lower income units are in high or highest resource tracts compared to 18.2 percent of
moderate income units and only 9.5 percent of above
moderate income units. Overall, 29 percent of units are in low resource tracts, including 21.6 percent of lower income units, and 16.8 percent are in tracts of high segregation and poverty, including 16.6 percent of lower income units.

Though a substantial proportion of lower income units are in low resource and high segregation and poverty tracts, the City’s RHNA strategy generally locates units throughout the City, and does not disproportionally put lower income units in low resource areas in comparison to moderate and above moderate income units. Thus, the site inventory helps address patterns of segregation by focusing more
low-income units in higher resource areas, and more
market rate units in lower resource areas.

It is also important that many of the sites in the inventory are designed to facilitate housing affordable to various income levels, either through the provision of very-low and low-income units as required by inclusionary housing ordinance in the Downtown and Midtown areas of the City, or through the Enhanced Density Bonus incentives that
go above and beyond state law to facilitate mixed-income projects that include low or moderate-income units
citywide. The incentives are for EDB are generous across the board, but are most generous for moderate-income
units. These two strategies are critical to facilitating mixed- income housing, including in high-opportunity areas,
as has been successful in Los Angele’s Transit Oriented Communities program, which the Enhanced Density Bonus
is modeled from. Program 6.7 calls for monitoring and
potentially expand the inclusionary housing requirements to other submarkets, and Program 6.10: Zoning Tailored to Disadvantaged Neighborhoods, to maximize benefits of
new development for lower-income communities of color
while employing strategies to minimize displacement.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-56
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-21: Sites Inventory and TCAC Opportunity Areas

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-57
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-22: Distribution of City and Sites Inventory Area by TCAC Opportunity Score

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-58
Appendix
F
January 2022
As discussed previously, the eastern section of the City tends to have higher environmental quality compared
to the western section of the City. Figure F-23 shows the Sites Inventory and CalEnviroScreen score by census tract.

Most of the sites are located in the western and southern sections of the City.

Figure F-24 shows the breakdown of the Sites Inventory
area by CalEnviroScreen score. The sites identified to
fulfill the City’s RHNA are disproportionately located in higher risk areas. Approximately 39 percent of the City has a CalEnviroScreen score of 6 or above, and is a higher environmental risk area. However, 72 percent of the area identified in the Sites Inventory is located within tracts that scored a 6 or above. Only 23 percent of the Sites Inventory area is located in a tract that scored a 5 or below.

Table F-10: Sites Inventory Unit Breakdown by TCAC Opportunity Score TCAC Opportunity Area Score
(Tract)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-Income
Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA
Units
Highest Resource 5.6% 7.8% 4.2% 5.0%
High Resource 13.5% 10.4% 5.2% 9.2%
Moderate Resource 41.6% 29.4% 29.4% 34.9%
Moderate Resource (Rapidly
Changing) 1.1% 2.0% 0.9% 1.1%
Low Resource 21.6% 16.9% 37.1% 29.0%
High Segregation and Poverty 16.6% 17.9% 16.8% 16.8%
Missing/Insufficient Data 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 3.9%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
The February 2021 update to the CalEnviroScreen
(CalEnviroScreen 4.0) and the distribution of the City’s sites inventory by unit is shown in Table F-11. A census tract’s overall CalEnviroScreen percentile equals the
percentage of all ordered CalEnviroScreen scores that fall below the score for that area. Most units are in tracts with poor EnviroScreenScores in the 81st percentile or above, including 64.1 percent of lower income units, 45.6 percent of moderate income units, and 71.9 percent of above
moderate income units. A smaller percentage of lower
income units fall into the 40th percentile or below (4.8 percent), compared to 27.2 percent of moderate income
units and 11.8 percent of above moderate income units.

However, 31.1 percent of lower income units fall into the mid-range scores between the 40th and 80th percentile,
while only 27.2 percent of moderate income units and

16.2 percent of above moderate income units fall into this range.

As shown, lower-income units are not more strongly
focused in high CalEnviroScreen areas compared to
other income levels. Although a larger proportion of site inventory units are in high CalEnviroScreen scoring areas than the City’s overall breakdown of scores, this also
reflects that areas well served by transit and jobs, such as the Downtown area, are in high CalEnviroScreen areas as West, Central and North Long Beach are impacted by the
Port and goods movement corridors.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-59
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-23: Sites Inventory and CalEnviroScreen Score

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-60
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-24: Distribution of City and Sites Inventory Area by CalEnviroScreen Score

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-61
FAppendix
January 2022
Table F-11: Distribution of RHNA Units by CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile Score CalEnviroScreen Percentile
Score (Tract) Lower Income Units Moderate-Income
Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units All RHNA Units
<20% 2.1% 18.4% 8.3% 6.0%
21-40% 2.7% 8.8% 3.5% 3.4%
41-60% 12.5% 8.0% 3.9% 8.0%
61-80% 18.5% 19.3% 12.4% 15.5%
>81% 64.1% 45.6% 71.4% 67.4%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Table F-12 shows a majority (65.5%) of lower income RHNA units are located in tracts where racial/ethnic minorities make up more than 80% of the population. A majority of moderate income units (59.7%) are also located in tracts with racial ethnic minority populations greater than 80%, while only 48.6% of above moderate income units are in tracts with a racial/ ethnic minority population exceeding 80%. There are very few RHNA sites, affordable or market-rate, in tracts where racial/ ethnic minority concentrations are between 0 and 40%; however, as shown in Figure F-25, most tracts in the City have high racial/ethnic minority concentrations. Long Beach as a whole is a city with a majority people of color, however a majority of the sites identified to meet the RHNA are located in areas of the City with the greatest concentrations of people of color.

Table F-12: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Racial/Ethnic Minority Population Racial/Ethnic Minority
Population (Census Tracts) Lower Income Units Moderate-Income Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units All RHNA Units
<=20% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

20.1-40% 4.0% 5.9% 3.5% 3.8%

40.1-60% 8.6% 8.9% 17.3% 12.9%

60.1-80% 21.9% 9.8% 24.3% 22.5%
>80% 65.5% 59.7% 48.6% 56.8%
No data 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 39%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-62
Appendix
F
January 2022
As shown in Table F-13, there are no sites used to meet the City’s RHNA in tracts where disabled populations exceed 30%.

Approximately 41% of lower income RHNA units, 40% of moderate income units, and 36% of above moderate income units are in tracts with a disabled population below 10%. Only 3.1% of all RHNA units are in tracts where the disabled persons make up between 20 and 30% of the population, none of which are lower income units. Figure F-26 shows the Sites Inventory and the concentration of persons with disabilities. The southwestern section of the City has the highest concentration of persons with disabilities, however none of the sites identified to meet the RHNA are located within these tracts.

Table F-13: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Disabled Population Disabled Population (Census Tracts) Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<10% 41.3% 40.0% 36.0% 38.6%
10-20% 58.0% 44.1% 52.2% 54.4%
20-30% 0.7% 0.3% 5.5% 3.1%
No Data 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 3.9%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Of the total units used to meet the RHNA, regardless of income category, 30% are in tracts where 20-40% of children are in married couple households, 31.6% where 40-60% of children are in married couple households, and 30.4% where 60-80% of children are in married couple households ( Table F-14). Approximately 41% of moderate income RHNA units are in tracts where only 20-40% of children live in married couple households, compared to 24.1% of moderate income units and

22.4% of lower income units.

Table F-14: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Children in Married Couple Households Children in Married Couple Households
(Census Tracts)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<20% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
20-40% 22.4% 24.1% 40.8% 31.6%
40-60% 41.8% 37.1% 19.3% 31.4%
60-80% 32.2% 18.0% 30.5% 30.6%
>80% 3.6% 5.2% 3.0% 3.4%
No Data available 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 3.9%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-63
FAppendix
January 2022
As presented in Table F-15 1.2% of moderate income units and 0.5% of above moderate income units are in tracts where between 60 and 80% of children live in single-parent female-headed households. Nearly half of lower income RHNA units are in tracts where 20 to 40% of children live in female-headed households and another 31.1% are in tracts where fewer than 20% of children live in female-headed households. The Sites Inventory and concentration of children by household type are shown in Figure F-27 and Figure F-28.

Table F-15: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Children in Female-Headed Households Children in Female-Headed Households
(Census Tracts)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<20% 31.1% 19.2% 27.4% 26.2%
20-40% 16.9% 46.1% 31.7% 36.8%
40-60% 22.0% 18.8% 33.8% 27.1%
60-80% 0.0% 1.2% 0.5% 0.3%
>80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
No Data available 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
As shown in Table F-16, there are more RHNA units, affordable and market-rate, located in tracts with higher concentrations of LMI households exceeding 50%. Approximately 45% of lower income units, 44% of moderate income units, and 42% of above moderate income units are in tracts with an LMI population over 75%. A smaller share of lower income units (2.1%) are in tracts where LMI households make up less than 25% of the population, compared to moderate income units (18.9%) and above moderate income units (8.9%). As discussed previously, there are higher concentrations of LMI households on the western side of the City. Figure F-29 shows that most of the sites selected to meet the RHNA are also located along the western and southern sections of the City in tracts with higher percentages of LMI households.

Table F-16: Sites Inventory Breakdown by LMI Households LMI Households
(Census Tracts)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<25% 2.1% 18.9% 8.9% 6.3%

25.1-50% 18.1% 9.4% 22.6% 19.9%

50.1-75% 34.9% 28.1% 26.9% 30.6%

75.1-100% 44.9% 43.6% 41.5% 43.2%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-64
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-25: Sites Inventory and Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentration

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-65
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-26: Sites Inventory and Concentration of Persons with Disabilities

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-66
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-27: Sites Inventory and Concentration of Children in Married Couple Households

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-67
FAppendix
January 2022
Figure F-28: Sites Inventory and Concentration of Children in Female-Headed Households

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-68
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-29: Sites Inventory and Concentration of LMI Households

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-69
FAppendix
January 2022
D. Additional Geographic Analysis of
Site Inventory Impact on Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing
As noted in Section B of this Appendix, the City of Long Beach has experienced fair housing issues since its
inception and like many cities, has often exacerbated these same issues through governmental policies and zoning
regulations. The Site Inventory, while not fully addressing all existing fair housing issues in the City, is nevertheless a meaningful step that begins to reverse course on the last century of housing policy in the City. Additional analysis on the geographic distribution of the Site Inventory compared to the existing housing stock contextualizes how the Site Inventory in combination with many policies and initiatives in the Housing Plan and already underway in the City
demonstrates said reversal.

Existing Conditions by City Sub-Region and
Opportunity Area
The City’s housing stock is found in 12 primary zip codes.

These zip codes can be aggregated into six areas of the City to differentiate geographies with both the existing housing and the sites identified in the inventory. The areas are each comprised of 1 to 3 zip codes as shown in Figure F-30:
» North: 90805 and 90807
» Central: 90804, 90806, and 90813
» East: 90808 and 90815
» Southeast: 90803 and 90814
» Downtown: 90802 and 90831
» West: 90810
Each region can be summarized by the distribution of
Census Tracts with different TCAC Opportunity Areas within it, as shown in Table F-17.

Table F-17: Regional Makeup by TCAC Opportunity Area Distribution TCAC Category North Central East Southeast Downtown West Highest Resource - - 15 12 - -
High Resource 8 4 4 3 2 1
Moderate Resource (Rapidly
Changing) 1 2 - - - -
Moderate Resource 12 10 - 2 3 4
Low Resource 7 4 - - 5 4
High Segregation & Poverty 2 13 - - - 2
Total 30 33 19 17 10 11
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-70
Appendix
F
January 2022
Figure F-30: Long Beach Sub-Regions
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-71
FAppendix
January 2022
North Long Beach is a mix of all categories except highest resource, with an overall mix that puts it in the middle of the opportunity-segregation spectrum. The northern/
western border areas are a combination of low-resource
and high poverty, while the southern part of North Long Beach contains more affluent neighborhoods such as Bixby Knolls and the Virginia Country Club. Central Long Beach is the only area with three zip codes, one of which (90813) includes portions of both Downtown (south of 10th street) and West Long Beach (west of the Los Angeles River and 710 freeway); however, the majority of 90813 is still within what is commonly known as Central Long Beach, and includes
notable places like the Washington neighborhood and
Poly High School associated with this area. Central Long Beach also contains pockets of high-resource tracts, but is characterized by comprising the vast majority of the city’s high segregation and poverty tracts. This area has been affected by redlining and other exclusionary practices for decades, as shown in the map at the beginning of Section B of this appendix. As a result, there is deep need in much of the area, though these tracts are often adjacent to
moderate resource tracts, including some that are rapidly changing. West Long Beach is similarly a combination of moderate and low resource tracts, with pockets of high
poverty and segregation exacerbated by longstanding
environmental justice issues due to its proximity to the Port of Long Beach and major freight routes along the 710 freeway.

Conversely, East Long Beach is exclusively high-resource, and comprised mainly of suburban affluent tracts.

Southeast LB is similarly very high resource, with a couple moderate tracts and no areas of need; there is one census tract identified in Figure F-19 as a R/ECAP area in Southeast LB, but this is mainly a function of the limited data for the tract, which includes the Los Cerritos Wetlands and Synergy Oil field and does not currently have any housing or
population within the tract (census tract number 9800.07).

As shown in Figure F-7 both East and Southeast Long Beach are primarily white, in contrast to North, Central and West Long Beach which are overwhelmingly people of color.

Finally, Downtown Long Beach, like North, is a combination of high, moderate, and low resource, but has also changed significantly with a development resurgence since 2010
and will likely continue to do so as investment continues in the area.

Site Inventory Distribution by City Sub-Region and
Opportunity Area
Table F-18 provides a breakdown of the distribution of sites in the inventory by region in comparison to the distribution of existing housing units in the City. A disproportionately high number of units are within the Central area, at a rate nearly double its current share of existing housing units, which reflects the planning strategy of focusing new
housing in areas of the city with the highest quality transit by focusing the greatest amount of potential density in areas with the state’s high-quality transit designation, in line with planning best practices and state guidelines for reducing carbon emissions. Figure F-31 shows how the
aforementioned 90813 zip code contains both the most
above moderate-income and low-income units of any zip
code in the City. Similarly, a relative high share of units is within Downtown, which reflects the zoning capacity
provided by the Downtown Community Plan which is
designed to maximize the state-designated high-quality a transit in the plan area. However, while most of the units identified within Downtown are above moderate-income,
the opposite is true for the Central area, which has a higher share of low-income units within it compared to other unit income categories.

In contrast, a relatively low share of all units are found within East and Southeast Long Beach, which echoes the analysis in Section C around higher-resourced, whiter, and less poor areas being underrepresented in the Site Inventory given limited opportunity for high-density growth. Despite these constraints, a higher share of the units that are allocated to East and Southeast Long Beach are affordable compared to other sub-areas, which reflects the City’s goal of improving access to affordable housing in high-opportunity
areas, desegregating exclusionary communities, and
fostering mixed-income neighborhoods. Additional
units are anticipated in these areas through lower-scale development such as Accessory Dwelling Units or “missing middle” housing, but are not reflected on the site inventory.

West Long Beach also has a lower share of units allocated to it compared to its proportion of existing housing stock, but this reflects the city’s focus on prioritizing new housing away from environmentally burdened communities,
which cannot be easily remediated through place-based
strategies due to the locational causes of said burdens.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-72
Appendix
F
January 2022
Finally, North Long Beach has units allocated to it relatively proportionate to the existing housing stock, with over 70% of said units designated affordable, reflecting the need for affordable housing expressed by current residents as well as the integration of mixed-income developments
within moderate and high-resource neighborhoods. This is further supported by the fact that of the 3,843 low-income units anticipated within this area, more than 2,200 are found within the 90807 zip code, which contains all
high-opportunity census tracts and nearly all of the white population of North Long Beach, as shown in Figure F-31.

Table F-18: Site Inventory Breakdown by Region
Sub Region Lower Income
Units
Moderate-Income
Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units All RHNA Units All Dwelling Units
North 30% 30% 13% 21% 22%
Central 52% 40% 43% 47% 27%
East 3% 0% 1% 2% 17%
Southeast 3% 25% 10% 8% 15%
Downtown 11% 2% 32% 21% 14%
West 1% 2% 1% 1% 5%
Figure F-31: Income Breakdown of Site Inventory Units by Zip Code Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-73
FAppendix
January 2022
Site Inventory Impacts on Beginning to Reverse
Generations of Housing Development Trends
An assessment of housing production over the past
century by region provides necessary context for the
current distribution of housing in the City as well as the impact of the Site Inventory on housing equity and access for current and future residents. Though exclusionary
housing patterns will not be fully reversed by the
Inventory, the Site Inventory Strategy represents the first time in decades that the City is proactively planning for more equitable housing distribution throughout Long
Beach rather than reinforcing existing segregation patterns and policies. Figure F-32 shows a decadal breakdown of
when housing was built in each region. While housing
production overall has declined dramatically citywide and most of the City’s housing stock is over 50 years old, new housing construction has been nearly nonexistent in East and Southeast Long Beach for the past 30 years. As Figure F-32 shows, 93% of housing in East Long Beach is over 50 years old, and 97% of housing in South East Long Beach is over 30 years old. Most notably, East and Southeast Long Beach are the only two areas of the City that have not had a single multifamily development of 10 or more units in over 30 years. Only North Long Beach approaches a similar kind of distribution and drop off in development since the 1980s, and unlike East and South East Long Beach, this area has been affected by racialized disinvestment and capital flight in addition to exclusionary zoning. Table F-19 shows the proportion of the City’s housing that was built in each region by decade, where a steep and sustained dropoff in development is evident in East Long Beach following the post-war suburban boon of the 1950s that saw the area
build nearly half of the City’s housing during said decade.

In the most recent decade, East and South East Long Beach each contributed less than 5% to the City’s housing stock, despite together accounting for a third of all housing in the City. The opposite trend is evident in Downtown, which
has experienced a developmental revitalization mirroring other major city downtowns throughout the country in
recent decades and provided 45% of the City’s new housing since 2010.

Figure F-32: Housing by Decade Built for each Region
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-74
Appendix
F
January 2022
Thus, the City’s site inventory begins to reverse longstanding trends by identifying sites for multifamily and mixed-income housing in both East and–particularly–Southeast Long Beach, both of which were fully excluded from site inventories in the past two Housing Element updates. Additionally, rather than concentrate the bulk of sites within Downtown, the City has spread sites to North Long Beach to address disinvestment and provide needed housing at all affordability levels.

Finally, as Central Long Beach has an overconcentration of poverty, rent burden, and overcrowding, the Site Inventory allots the majority of affordable housing in the area both to address the need of existing residents without requiring relocation from their communities and due to its proximity to Downtown, jobs and high-quality transit infrastructure, including the only high-quality bus corridor and rail connection to the greater Los Angeles region. The City is also taking additional steps to prevent overconcentration of low-income housing through additional policies, including a collaborative effort between the City’s Development Services Department and the Housing Authority to exclude certain census tracts in Central Long Beach with an overconcentration of project-based vouchers from future disbursements and providing incentives for project-based vouchers in high-opportunity areas, as described in Program 6.3 (Voucher Mobility).

Table F-19: Decadal Share of Housing Built by Region
Sub Region 2010s 2000s 1990s 1980s 1970s 1960s 1950s Pre- 1950s Total
North 10% 8% 15% 13% 26% 29% 21% 25% 23%
Central 24% 41% 39% 44% 24% 30% 14% 32% 29%
East 2% 4% 8% 5% 9% 15% 49% 10% 18%
Southeast 4% 10% 16% 16% 20% 16% 8% 17% 15%
Downtown 45% 28% 19% 15% 8% 7% 4% 11% 10%
West 14% 9% 2% 7% 13% 3% 4% 5% 5%
Using the Urban Displacement Project ’s Typology category, Table F-20 shows the distribution of units in the City’s Site Inventory by income level in comparison to the distribution of existing housing in Long Beach. Reflecting the geographic analysis above, the tracts designated as more stable or exclusive, which are primarily located in East Long Beach but also include the southern parts of North Long Beach, are underrepresented in the inventory. However, as noted prior, there is still an important shift from past policies to begin to open up these areas to new housing at all income levels and decrease gentrification and displacement pressure from other areas in the City. Additionally, the areas at risk of becoming exclusive, which are interspersed between Southeast Long Beach and North Long Beach, have unit counts in the Site Inventory more closely reflective of their existing share of housing and equitably distributed between low-income, moderate-income, and above-moderate income housing. This will help to ensure such areas do not become exclusive and provide housing and economic mobility and stability for current and future City residents by beginning to address historical segregation patterns. Evidence of these efforts is seen in the multiple projects at various stages of development within the Southeast Specific Plan area. Since the plan was fully adopted in July 2021, the City has begun to receive formal project applications and pre-application inquiries representing nearly 1,300 housing units and anticipated to use density bonus to include affordable units in these projects.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-75
FAppendix
January 2022
This approach by the City is complemented by prioritizing high shares of affordable housing within tracts that are designated as susceptible to displacement and are often adjacent to tracts designated as advanced gentrification, in order to meet existing residents’ affordable housing needs. Nearly all of said areas are located within Central and North Long Beach, both of which are undergoing targeted community-centered rezoning efforts by the City through the UPLAN and ACZIP initiatives.

These initiatives are a critical effort in ensuring that the new zoning districts and regulations are reflective of community priorities and incentivize investment without displacement, but also take additional steps to increase community planning capacity and foster decision-making and agency within governance structures by community members and residents.

The Long Beach Planning Bureau intentionally selected both areas to initiate rezoning efforts to implement the 2019 Land Use Element update to prioritize the communities with the highest need that had historically been marginalized by prior land use updates. Additionally, the majority of the budget for both initiatives has been allocated to community power- building processes and efforts to promote shared decision-making (see Program 6.10). Combined with a more equitable and geographically balanced site inventory compared to past Housing Element Updates, these place-based initiatives place the City on a path to begin meaningfully addressing historic fair housing issues at an unprecedented scale for Long Beach and mitigate displacement at the neighborhood level through new land use regulations.

Table F-20: Site Inventory Distribution by Urban Displacement Project Census Tract Categories Displacement Project Census Tract
Category
Lower
Income Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA
Units
All Dwelling
Units
Advanced Gentrification 3% 1% 9% 6% 4%
At Risk of Becoming Exclusive 17% 13% 18% 17% 23%
Becoming Exclusive 2% 4% 2% 2% 6%
Early/Ongoing Gentrification 12% 4% 27% 19% 9%
High Student Population 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%
Low-Income/Susceptible to Displacement 29% 27% 16% 22% 16% Ongoing Displacement 19% 22% 15% 17% 12%
Stable Moderate/Mixed Income 13% 7% 4% 8% 14%
Stable/Advanced Exclusive 5% 6% 4% 5% 15%
Unavailable or Unreliable Data 0% 16% 6% 4% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
One final measure of analysis for the AFFH impact of the Site Inventory is through a neighborhood case study example using indicators from Section C of this Appendix. Tables F-21, F-22, F-23 , and F-24 below provide revised data for the distribution of site inventory units across four major socioeconomic indicators, with additional comparison to the distribution of existing units in the City. As Tables F-21 and F-22 show, compared to proportions of the existing housing stock, a disproportionate share of anticipated dwelling units through the site inventory is in tracts that are 60% or more people of color and 50% or more low-to-moderate income (LMI) households, and in both cases the highest share of housing is in the highest category for each indicator. However, most of the existing housing stock in the City is already located in these tracts to begin with, due to how housing production, demographics and local jobs have changed since 1980. In contrast, the majority white tracts with higher income levels largely located in East and South East Long Beach are under-represented in the Site Inventory compared to their share of existing housing. However, as noted above, this is the first time in decades that the City is starting to reverse this trend from near zero, to make progress in adding some units Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-76
Appendix
F
January 2022
in these high resource areas through the Site Inventory strategy. Additionally within tracts that have a lower share of LMI households, a higher share of units are designated as moderate-income and market-rate, to promote income mixing and promote market housing in areas that are not at as high of a risk for gentrification and displacement, Initiatives like the City’s Enhanced Density Bonus (Program 2.1) help to incentivize this mixed-income housing approach to begin addressing patterns of segregation as has been successful in Los Angeles through the Transit-Oriented Communities program upon which the Enhanced Density Bonus program was modeled.

Table F-21: Site Inventory Units and Existing Housing Distribution by Racial/Ethnic Minority Population Percent People of
Color
Very Low Income
Units
Moderate Income
Units Market Rate Units Site Inventory
Unit Totals
All Existing
Dwelling Units
0-40% 4% 22% 10% 8% 23%

40.1-60% 9% 8% 17% 13% 20%

60.1-80% 22% 10% 24% 23% 13%

80.1-100% 66% 60% 49% 57% 44%
Table F-22: Site Inventory Units and Existing Housing Distribution by LMI Households Percent
Low-Moderate
Income
Households
Very Low Income
Units
Moderate Income
Units Market Rate Units Site Inventory
Unit Totals All Dwelling Units
0-24.99% 2% 19% 9% 6% 13%
25-49.99% 18% 9% 23% 20% 29%
50-74.99% 35% 28% 27% 31% 32%
75-100% 45% 44% 42% 43% 27%
In comparison, Tables F-23 and F-24 show how this upwards distribution for both existing housing and the site inventory is not maintained when analyzing rent burden and overcrowding. Instead, nearly half of the City’s existing housing stock is in tracts with low overcrowding rates, and 27% of housing is located in tracts with the highest rate of overcrowding. Once again, tracts with higher rates of overcrowding, particularly in Central and North Long Beach, are overrepresented in the site inventory. To address high levels of overcrowding in the City, a high share of Site Inventory units are concentrated in areas with 15% or more overcrowding, of which a disproportionate amount are low-income units given that affordable units are in greatest demand for households experiencing overcrowding. While the distribution of existing units is a U-curve for overcrowding with most housing in the tracts with the lowest and highest rates, Table F-24 shows how it is the inverse for rent burden, with 60% of existing housing in the tracts where 40 to 60% of renter households are rent-burdened. The Site Inventory instead allocates a higher share of units to tracts that have the highest rent burden, and distributes said units equitably between all three income categories.

Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-77
FAppendix
January 2022
Table F-23: Site Inventory and Existing Housing Distribution by Overcrowding Percent
Overcrowded
Households
Very Low Income
Units
Moderate Income
Units Market Rate Units Site Inventory
Totals All Dwelling Units
0-8.2% 22% 38% 29% 26% 48%

8.3-12% 12% 6% 10% 11% 8%

12.01-15% 4% 10% 5% 5% 7%

15.01-20% 15% 7% 14% 14% 10%

20.01-100% 47% 39% 42% 44% 27%
Table F-24: Site Inventory and Existing Housing Distribution by Renter Rent Burden Percent
Rent-Burdened
Households
Very Low Income
Units
Moderate Income
Units Market Rate Units Site Inventory
Totals All Dwelling Units
0-20% 0% 16% 6% 4% 2%

20.1-40% 2% 5% 3% 2% 17%

40.1-60% 66% 50% 61% 63% 60%

60.1-80% 32% 28% 30% 31% 21%

80.1-100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
The Washington neighborhood, most of which is encompassed by Census Tract 5754.02 can be used as a case study example for the combined positive impact of the site inventory and policies of the Housing Element in addressing fair housing issues. Census Tract 5754.02 is among the most marginalized in the City by all 4 indicators analyzed above: it is 97% people of color, has 20.7% of its households living in overcrowded conditions, is 82% renter (of which 57% are rent-burdened), and is 83% LMI households. Within this census tract there are 19 sites in the inventory, comprised of 43 parcels. These parcels account for nearly 1,200 units estimated for their respective sites, of which more than 70% are designated as affordable.

Census tracts, such as 5754.02 in Washington, have a larger share of low-income units to reflect existing need and in line with polices to focus density and affordable housing near high quality transit, given the Washington Neighborhood is served by the Metro A-Line and several frequent bus routes. The City has done extensive targeted initiatives with the Washington neighborhood in recent years across nearly every department, including interdepartmental public safety initiatives to address rising gun violence and support neighborhood leadership, Health department partnerships to increase healthy outcomes for youth, climate change programming to address the urban heat island effect, active transportation infrastructure investment led by the Public Works department through funding dedications in the annual Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget, place-based improvement funding through the Consolidated Plan including for park improvements and expansion, neighborhood business façade improvements, neighborhood leadership training, and ACZIP to provide zoning regulations to institutionalize all of the aforementioned initiatives. Through these deliberative partnerships, community members have consistently expressed the need and desire to be able to benefit from place- based improvements and have greater access to affordable housing within their communities so as to not be forced to leave as the neighborhood improves, and in order to gain housing stability. The Site Inventory provides a roadmap to expand said access through the next decade.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-78
Appendix
F
January 2022
E. Identification and Prioritization of
Contributing Factors
Through its 2017 AFH, the City prioritized 22 contributing factors to fair housing issues. Since that time, the City has continued to have community conversations, data
gathering and analysis on fair housing issues including through development of an Office of Equity, an Equitable Growth Profile, through public conversations with the City Council on housing issues including through the Mayor’s Taskforce on Workforce and Affordable Housing, the
Everyone Home Plan, and development of the inclusionary housing policy. Subsequently, as described above, the in the wake of the killing of George Floyd and the 2020 civil uprising, the City developed a Framework for Reconciliation in partnership with the community to begin addressing
structural and systemic racism.

Major themes and concerns related to housing included:
» The disproportionate impact of housing cost burden on black residents and people of color
» Concerns with the racial gaps in homeownership
» Housing is not available for residents of color in higher opportunity areas of the City
» Housing discrimination against black people and
communities of color
» Eviction rates and lack of sufficient tenant protections » Not enough affordable housing is available
» Disproportionate rates of gentrification and the
displacement of low-income residents who are more
likely to be people of color.
» Environmental racism and a history of inequitable
development in the City
Based on available data, including data in Appendices B and F, the 2016 Assessment of Fair Housing, as well as the above-summarized feedback from community over the
past several years, the following are the most significant contributing factors to fair housing issues in Long Beach.

With limited resources and ability of a local jurisdiction to effectively implement change, the following contributing factors have been prioritized with programs and efforts as outlined in the Housing Plan and summarized below.
» Contributing Factor: Displacement of residents due to economic pressures
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 3.1 Tenant Based Rental Assistance
Programs
◊ Program 3.3: Homeownership Assistance
◊ Program 5.2: Tenant Protection
◊ Program 6.4: Replacement Housing Requirements
◊ Program 6.5: Tenant Rights to Counsel
• Program 3.1 Tenant Based Rental Assistance
Programs
• Program 3.3: Homeownership Assistance
• Program 5.2: Tenant Protection
• Program 6.4: Replacement Housing
Requirements
• Program 6.5: Tenant Rights to Counsel
» Contributing Factor: Location and type of affordable
housing
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 1.1: Adequate Sites for RHNA (Enhanced
Density Bonus)
◊ Program 1.3 Monitoring of No Net Loss
◊ Program 1.4 Make Public Land Available for
Affordable Housing
◊ Program 1.5: Religious Facility Housing Overlay
◊ Program 1.7: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
Support
◊ Program 2.1: Development Incentives (Enhanced
Density Bonus)
◊ Program 6.7: Inclusionary Housing
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-79
FAppendix
January 2022
» Contributing Factor: Land use and zoning laws
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 2.1: Adaptive Reuse
◊ Program 2.3: Zoning Code Amendments
◊ Program 2.4: A Variety of Housing Types
◊ Program 6.2: Visitability Ordinance
» Contributing Factor: Lack of private investments in
specific neighborhoods
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 6.8: Community Land Trust
◊ Program 6.10: Zoning Tailored to Disadvantaged
Neighborhoods
» Contributing Factor: Lack of public investments in
specific neighborhoods
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 1.6 Affordable Housing Development
Assistance
◊ Program 4.2 Supportive Housing/Century Villages
at Cabrillo
◊ Program 6.11: Consolidated Plan Update
◊ Program 6.12: Housing Rehabilitation
◊ Program 6.13: Neighborhood Resources
◊ Program 6.14: Neighborhood Leadership
Development
» Contributing Factor: Private discrimination/source of income discrimination
Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 3.2: Project-Based Vouchers
◊ Program 6.1: Fair Housing Outreach and
Enforcement
◊ Program 6.3: Voucher Mobility
» Contributing Factor :Deteriorated properties
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 5.3: Home Rehabilitation
◊ Program 5.4: Comprehensive Code Enforcement
» Contributing Factor: Location of environmental health hazards
– Housing Element Programs to begin addressing this
include:
◊ Program 6.10 Zoning Code Updates Tailored to
Disadvantaged Communities
◊ Program 6.11 Consolidated Plan Update
◊ Program 6.12 Housing Rehabilitation
◊ Program 6.14 Neighborhood Leadership
Development
F. Fair Housing Outcomes Measures
Given the variety of fair housing issues, contributing
factors and strategies contained in the Housing Element Update to address them, the City has conducted analysis to determine a few key overarching, meaningful outcomes with metrics that can be used to measure progress and
effectiveness of the overall effort and combined impact of programs to improve fair housing results. Table F-25 defines overarching outcomes and metrics for all the Fair Housing Strategies. Outcomes focus on reducing housing
discrimination; ensuring low income and HCV households
have housing mobility, including in high resource areas; preventing displacement for vulnerable households;
increasing the number of below market rate units in high resource areas; and improving neighborhood conditions in RECAPs and low opportunity areas. The key measures will be evaluated in the Mid-term Review (Program 7.3) and
periodically, as appropriate, to ensure the City is meeting its Fair Housing goals. In addition, as shown in section E above, the City has numerous programs to combat contributing
factors to fair housing issues.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-80
Appendix
F
January 2022
Table F-25: AFFH Programs by Category
Fair Housing
Strategy
Key Supporting
Programs
Overarching
Outcomes Key Measure(s) Time Frame
Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement
Program 6.1: Fair
Housing Outreach and
Enforcement
Ensure that
protected classes and
communities of color
do not face housing
discrimination
anywhere in the City.

Fair Housing
Foundation testing
shows a 10%
decrease in incidence
of discrimination
citywide.

Begin implementation
in 2022
Housing Mobility
Program 6.2:

Visitability Ordinance
Ensure that Low
Income and HCV
households have
housing options
in neighborhoods
throughout the City,
including in high
resource areas.
15% Increase in new
voucher use in high
opportunity areas.
10% of city-funded
housing units meeting
HUD visitability
standards.

Annual report on
voucher use by
geography to begin in
2022
Program 6.3: Voucher
Mobility
Anti-Displacement
Program 6.4:

Replacement Housing
Prevent vulnerable
households from
being displaced as a
result of increasing
housing costs.

Reduce number
of households by
5% classified as
"vulnerable" in
sensitive communities
as designated by the
UCB displacement
project.

Annual report on
progress to begin in
2023
Program 6.5: Tenants
Right to Counsel
Begin implementation
in 2022
Program 6.6:

Unpermitted Dwelling
Units Amnesty
Program
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-81
FAppendix
January 2022
Fair Housing
Strategy
Key Supporting
Programs
Overarching
Outcomes Key Measure(s) Time Frame
New Housing Choices in High Opportunity Areas
Program 6.7:

Inclusionary Housing
Increase the number
of below market rate
units in high resource
areas of the City
Increase unit
production in high
resource areas by
20% (including 5%
increased production
of lower income
units).

Concurrent with
new community
plan developments
scheduled for 2023
and 2024
Program 6.8:

Community Land Trust
Program 6.9:

Monitoring of Housing
Production
Program 1.5: Religious
Facility Housing
Overlay
Program 2.1
Development
Incentives (Enhanced
Density Bonus)
Program 1.7 Accessory
Dwelling Units
Program 2.4: A Variety
of Housing Types
Place-Based Strategies for Community Improvement
Program 6.10: Zoning
Code Updates Tailored
to Disadvantaged
Communities
Improve
neighborhood
conditions in RECAPs
and TCAC designated
Low Opportunity
areas
Ensure that a
minimum of 50% of
Consolidated Plan
funding is directed
towards RECAPs and
designated TCAC Low
Opportunity areas
Complete in 2025
Program 6.11:

Consolidated Plan
Update
Program 6.12: Housing
Rehabilitation
Program 6.13:

Neighborhood
Resources
Program 6.14:

Neighborhood
Leadership
Development
Table F-25: AFFH Programs by Category (continued)
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-82
Appendix
F
January 2022
This page left intentionally blank
Appendix C-1 | Entitlement and Permit Data
C-1 - 1
January 2022
C-1
Appendix

Appendix C-1 7
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-1 - 2
January 2022
Appendix
C-1
Appendix C-1: Recent Entitlement & Building Permit Data to Inform PlaceType Density Assumptions ..................................................................................................... C-1-1 Appendix C-17
Appendix C-1 | Entitlement and Permit Data
C-1 - 1
January 2022
C-1
Appendix
Appendix C-1: Recent Entitlement & Building Permit Data to Inform PlaceType Density Assumptions Assumptions for PlaceType densities and affordability levels (Table C-5) were derived from average densities for recent entitlement and building permit projects that most closely correspond to the density and height limits for each PlaceType, as summarized in the table. See Appendix C-1 (Appendix to this Appendix) for more detailed information on the recent entitlement and building permit projects analyzed to derive the averages used to develop estimated dwelling unit potential of sites on the site inventory.

Table C-1-1
Recent Entitlement Applications Analyzed to Help Estimate Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes APN Project_Name Project_Type Address Units Stories du_ac placetype major_area zone_desc SHAPE_Area (sf) acres Unit Income Mix 7075028014 Dorado Market 3655 Norwalk Boulevard 40 2 6.9 FCN Other City R-1-M 251,002 5.76 100% Market Rate 7281017071 Broadway Block Market & Affordable 330 E. 3rd St 432 23 215.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 87,503 2.01 7 Low Income Units, 7 Moderate
Income Units, 418 Market Rate Units
7131032911 City Ventures Market 5100 Long Beach Blvd 38 3 22.0 NSC-L Other City CCN 75,209 1.73 100% Market Rate 7278005154 Oceanaire Market 150 W. Ocean Boulevard 216 7 126.9 WF Other City PD-6 74,147 1.70 100% Market Rate 7209022028 201-245 PCH and 1827 Pacific Avenue Market 201 W Pacific Coast Highway 138 5 92.3 TOD-L Other City CCA 65,156 1.50 100% Market Rate 7273003501 The Beacon Affordable 1235 Long Beach Boulevard 160 7 107.6 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown PD-30 64,791 1.49 158 Very Low Income Units, 2 Market
Rate Units
7133010900 City Ventures Market 4800 Long Beach Blvd 18 3 16.3 NSC-L Other City R-4-N 48,167 1.11 100% Market Rate 7273024024 Pacific-Pine Market 635 Pine Avenue 271 8 262.3 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 45,006 1.03 100% Market Rate 7269019044 Las Ventanas Apartments Affordable 1795 Long Beach Boulevard 102 5 100.4 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 44,237 1.02 40 Very Low Income Units, 61 Low
Income Units, 1 Market Rate
7209009028 The Spark at Midtown Affordable 1900 Long Beach Boulevard 95 5 102.2 TOD-L Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 40,500 0.93 47 Very Low Income Units, 47 Low
Income Units, 1 Market Rate
7264019012 Silversands Market 2010 E. Ocean Boulevard 33 7 36.5 WF Other City PD-5 39,391 0.90 100% Market Rate 7269037038 Bloom at Magnolia Affordable 469 W. 17th Street 40 4 44.8 MFR-M Other City R-4-N 38,907 0.89 39 Very Low Income Units, 1 Market
Rate
7280022009 The Pacific Market 230 W. 3rd Street 163 8 182.6 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 38,892 0.89 100% Market Rate 7281017500 Huxton Market 227 Elm Avenue 40 3 45.2 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 38,544 0.88 100% Market Rate 7269023026 Long Beach Garden Condominiums Market 1570 Long Beach Boulevard 36 3 44.2 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 35,477 0.81 100% Market Rate 7262027001 7th St/Dawson Market 2200 E. 7th St 23 3 29.4 NSC-M Other City CCA 34,089 0.78 100% Market Rate 7281021223 The Alamitos Market 101 Alamitos Avenue 136 7 179.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 32,972 0.76 100% Market Rate 7210013026 Mercy Senior Housing Affordable 901 E. Pacific Coast Highway 68 4 92.9 NSC-M Other City CHW 31,869 0.73 100% Affordable 7278007043 Sonata Modern Flats Market 207 Seaside Way 113 5 170.2 WF Other City PD-6 28,918 0.66 100% Market Rate 7209015034 Vistas del Puerto Affordable 1836 Locust Avenue 48 5 78.1 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 26,771 0.61 100% Affordable 7275001083 320 Alamitos Avenue Market 320 Alamitos Avenue 77 7 131.2 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 25,557 0.59 100% Market Rate 7278027029 442 Residences Market 442 W. Ocean Boulevard 95 8 175.3 WF Other City PD-6 23,602 0.54 100% Market Rate 7278007049 Ocean View Tower Market 200 W. Ocean Boulevard 106 9 202.9 WF Other City PD-6 22,755 0.52 100% Market Rate 7269016157 Axiom Apartments Affordable 1401 Long Beach Boulevard 150 328.5 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 19,890 0.46 69 Market Rate, 73 Affordable Units 7268014001 1405 Lewis Avenue/1000 New York Street Market 1405 Lewis Avenue 19 47.0 FCN Other City R-1-N 17,606 0.40 100% Market Rate 7281010056 The Linden Market 434 E. 4th Street 49 6 143.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 14,831 0.34 100% Market Rate 7280005064 The Place at the Streets Market 495 The Promenade North 20 4 65.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 13,383 0.31 100% Market Rate 7281019047 135 Linden Avenue Market 135 Linden Avenue 82 7 320.8 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 11,135 0.26 100% Market Rate 7274020050 825 East 7th Street Market 825 E. 7th Street 27 5 134.2 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 8,765 0.20 100% Market Rate 7274023007 1028 E. 10th Street Market 1028 E. 10th St 5 3 28.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 7,528 0.17 100% Market Rate Recent Entitlement Applications Analyzed to Help Estimate Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-1 - 2
January 2022
Appendix
C-1
APN app_num entitlement addr_combined zip start_date num_units current_use status proposed_use issued_date final_date du_ac placetype major_area zone_desc SHAPE_Area (sf) acres Unit Income Mix 7280022007 BNEW187969 245 W BROADWAY 90802 2016-02-25 0:00:00 222 Vacant Issued Apartment 3/28/2017 129.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 74,892 1.72 100% Market Rate 7278005150 BNEW180416 Y 150 W OCEAN 90802 2015-08-12 0:00:00 216 Apartment Closed Apartment 4/6/2017 9/23/2019 127.1 WF Other City PD-6 74,022 1.70 100% Market Rate 7273003050 BNEW196474 Y 1235 LONG BEACH 90813 2016-09-29 0:00:00 160 Mix use Closed Mix use 5/16/2017 3/13/2020 107.6 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown PD-30 64,791 1.49 158 Very Low
Income Units, 2
Market Rate Units
7209009027 BNEW225778 Y 1900 LONG BEACH 90806 2018-10-05 0:00:00 95 Vacant Issued Mixed Use Building 3/15/2019 102.2 TOD-L Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 40,500 0.93 47 Very Low Income
Units, 47 Low
Income Units, 1
Market Rate Unit
7280022008 BNEW199562 Y 230 W 3RD 90802 2016-12-15 0:00:00 163 Vacant Lot Issued Apartments 9/29/2017 9/30/2020 182.6 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 38,892 0.89 100% Market Rate 7269023019 BNEW182565 Y 1570 LONG BEACH 90813 2015-10-06 0:00:00 36 Mixed Use Issued Mixed Use 9/13/2017 44.2 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 35,477 0.81 100% Market Rate 7278015045 BNEW222185 500 W BROADWAY 90802 2018-07-11 0:00:00 142 Vacant Issued Mixed Use 12/20/2019 178.5 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 34,644 0.80 100% Market Rate 7281021018 BNEW193742 Y 101 ALAMITOS 90802 2016-07-21 0:00:00 136 VACANT Issued MIXED USE BUILDING 7/10/2017 10/7/2020 179.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 32,972 0.76 100% Market Rate 7273024009 BNEW220809 Y 636 PACIFIC 90802 2018-06-08 0:00:00 194 Vacant Issued Apartment 5/21/2019 281.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 30,000 0.69 11 Low Income
Units, 183 Market
Rate Units
7278007041 BNEW188090 Y 207 E SEASIDE 90802 2016-02-29 0:00:00 112 Vacant Issued Apartments 3/15/2017 5/19/2020 168.7 WF Other City PD-6 28,918 0.66 100% Market Rate 7209015018 BNEW220754 Y 1836 LOCUST 90806 2018-06-07 0:00:00 48 NEW Issued APARTMENT 12/17/2018 78.1 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 26,771 0.61 47 Very Low Income
Units, 1 Market Rate
Unit
7281022058 BNEW219125 777 E OCEAN 90802 2018-04-26 0:00:00 315 Vacant Issued Apartment 9/20/2019 572.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 23,957 0.55 100% Market Rate 7278007049 BRMD200036 Y 200 W OCEAN 90802 2016-12-30 0:00:00 96 COMMERCIAL Issued APARTMENTS 12/20/2019 183.8 WF Other City PD-6 22,755 0.52 100% Market Rate 7273007047 BNEW226839 1112 LOCUST 90813 2018-10-31 0:00:00 97 Vacant Issued Apartment building 7/9/2020 190.3 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 22,200 0.51 100% Market Rate 7278007035 BRMD172741 110 W OCEAN 90802 2015-01-16 0:00:00 74 Issued Apartments 1/17/2020 162.0 WF Other City PD-6 19,897 0.46 100% Market Rate 7273024007 BNEW220811 Y 635 PINE 90802 2018-06-08 0:00:00 77 Vacant Issued Mixed Use Building 5/16/2019 223.5 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 15,006 0.34 100% Market Rate 7281010001 BNEW198817 Y 434 E 4TH 90802 2016-11-30 0:00:00 49 Vacant Lot Closed APARTMENT & RETAIL 7/28/2017 10/21/2019 143.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 14,831 0.34 100% Market Rate 7280005064 BNEW182244 Y 495 THE PROMENADE NORTH 90802 2015-09-29 0:00:00 20 .VACANT Issued COM & APARTMENT 12/4/2017 65.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 13,383 0.31 100% Market Rate 7281002024 BNEW219803 425 E 5TH 90802 2018-05-15 0:00:00 18 VACANT Issued 16-UNIT APARTMENT 10/17/2019 103.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 7,547 0.17 100% Market Rate 7281002025 BNEW199787 437 E 5TH 90802 2016-12-22 0:00:00 18 VACANT LOT Issued MIXED USE 10/3/2018 108.0 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 7,257 0.17 100% Market Rate Recent Building Permits Analyzed to Derive Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes Table C-1-2
Recent Building Permits Analyzed to Derive Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes Appendix C-1 | Entitlement and Permit Data
C-1 - 3
January 2022
C-1
Appendix
Table C-1-3
Summary and Analysis
***Note: These summary tables do not break out project averages by height limit and were solely used as informational for deriving general counts of project data zone_desc Count of app_numAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Row Labels Count of Project_NameAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac CCN 2 42.1 41.5 42.8 CCA 2 60.8 29.4 92.3
PD-30 27 167.5 51.2 572.7 CCN 1 22.0 22.0 22.0
PD-31 2 47.7 42.6 52.9 CHW 1 92.9 92.9 92.9
PD-5 1 61.9 61.9 61.9 PD-30 12 151.4 28.9 320.8
PD-6 5 163.0 127.1 183.8 PD-5 1 36.5 36.5 36.5
R-1-N 1 47.0 47.0 47.0 PD-6 4 168.8 126.9 202.9
R-2-A 1 52.0 52.0 52.0 R-1-M 1 6.9 6.9 6.9
R-4-N 1 44.8 44.8 44.8 R-1-N 1 47.0 47.0 47.0
R-4-R 1 90.0 90.0 90.0 R-4-N 2 30.5 16.3 44.8
SP-1-CDR 3 67.7 44.2 102.2 SP-1-CDR 2 73.2 44.2 102.2
SP-1-TN 2 67.6 57.1 78.1 SP-1-TN 3 169.0 78.1 328.5
(blank) (blank)
Grand Total 46 133.7 41.5 572.7 Grand Total 30 117.8 6.9 328.5 addr_combined (Multiple Items)
placetype Count of app_numAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Row Labels Count of Project_NameAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac DT 22 143.5 51.2 281.7 DT 11 155.4 28.9 320.8
FCN 2 49.5 47.0 52.0 FCN 2 27.0 6.9 47.0
MFR-M 1 44.8 44.8 44.8 MFR-M 1 44.8 44.8 44.8
NSC-M 2 42.1 41.5 42.8 NSC-L 2 19.1 16.3 22.0
RSF 2 47.7 42.6 52.9 NSC-M 2 61.2 29.4 92.9
TOD-L 3 83.0 56.7 102.2 TOD-L 2 97.2 92.3 102.2
TOD-M 6 85.7 44.2 127.9 TOD-M 5 131.8 44.2 328.5
WF 6 146.2 61.9 183.8 WF 5 142.4 36.5 202.9
(blank) (blank)
Grand Total 44 116.4 41.5 281.7 Grand Total 30 117.8 6.9 328.5 major_area Count of app_numAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Row Labels Count of Project_NameAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Downtown & Midtown 32 151.9 44.2 572.7 Downtown & Midtown 17 145.3 28.9 328.5 Other City 14 92.2 41.5 183.8 Other City 13 81.8 6.9 202.9 (blank) (blank)
Grand Total 46 133.7 41.5 572.7 Grand Total 30 117.8 6.9 328.5 Building Permits by Major Area Entitlements by Major Area Summary & Analysis
Building Permits by Zoning Entitlements by Zoning
Building Permits by PlaceType Entitlements by PlaceType Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-1 - 4
January 2022
Appendix
C-1
This page left intentionally blank
Appendix C-2 | Market Reports
C-2 - 171
January 2022
C-2
Appendix
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
January 2022

Appendix C-2 7
January 2022
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-2 - 172
January 2022
Appendix
C-2
Appendix C-2: Market Reports Used to Support Findings that Sites Will Develop During the Planning Period .......................................................................C-2-1 Appendix C-27
Appendix C-2 | Market Reports
C-2 - 1
January 2022
C-2
Appendix
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
January 2022
Appendix C-2: Market Reports
Used to Support Findings that
Sites Will Develop During the
Planning Period Table of Sites
under PlaceTypes
The following reports describe commercial office and
retail trends in Long Beach and the Los Angeles Region.

The reports show that commercial office and retail are
experiencing high vacancy rates, higher rates in Long
Beach compared to the region, with as high as 50% vacancy rates for Long Beach malls in the suburban submarket,
compared to 9% vacancy rates for the Los Angeles region.

These reports help comprise the substantial evidence
upon which the City found that underutilized commercial sites on the site inventory are likely to develop during the planning period.

January 2022
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-2 - 2
January 2022
Appendix
C-2
This page left intentionally blank
Long Beach: Suburban

PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Office Submarket Report
Los Angeles - CA

OFFICE SUBMARKET REPORT
Submarket Key Statistics 1
Leasing 2
Rent 5
Construction 7
Sales 10
Sales Past 12 Months 12
Supply & Demand Trends 14
Rent & Vacancy 16
Sale Trends 18
Long Beach: Suburban Office
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview Long Beach: Suburban Office

16.5K (416K) 12.5% 1.7%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth The Long Beach Suburban Submarket offers employers
a central location to draw labor from many areas of Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Office rents are cheaper
than in many other locations in the L.A. metro. Tenancy is diverse, with general corporate, aerospace, medical
services, and government tenants making up much of
the area's tenancy. Large tenants in the submarket
include Boeing, Continental DataGraphics, and SCAN
Health Plan. Inventory is spread throughout the
submarket, but the lion's share of 4 & 5 Star inventory is located close to the Long Beach Airport.

Although submarket vacancy is below the metro average,
the submarket has seen vacancy rise in recent quarters
like the Greater Los Angeles office market. Rental rates peaked in 20Q1 and have moved sideways since.

Looking at construction, supply additions in the
submarket have been modest, with the last major
deliveries in 2017 and 2018 in the Douglas Park mixed-
use project. The current construction pipeline comprises one medical office building and a build-to-suit for
software firm Laserfiche.

KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$36.0425.4%2,858,4464 & 5 Star 25.9% (5,625) 0 100,000
$33.547.2%3,897,1743 Star 10.3% 0 0 0
$27.157.6%3,266,2301 & 2 Star 7.6% (1,645) 0 0
$32.2112.5%10,021,850Submarket 14.0% (7,270) 0 100,000
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When

13.5%8.9%4.3%Vacancy Change (YOY) 14.9% 1999 Q2 4.5% 2007 Q3 (26,448)3,698(416K)Net Absorption SF 646,024 2001 Q2 (487,881) 2011 Q1 27,00745,20416.5KDeliveries SF 200,993 2001 Q2 0 2020 Q3

2.6%3.2%1.7%Rent Growth 10.7% 2007 Q4 -7.8% 2009 Q4
N/A$50.2M$47.7MSales Volume $164.6M 2006 Q4 $5.9M 1997 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Leasing Long Beach: Suburban Office
Submarket vacancy in Suburban Long Beach is presently

12.5%, up considerably from 5.5% in 19Q2. Several
major move-outs in the submarket since the second half
of 2019 precipitated the recent sharp rise in vacancies.

The pandemic has also hindered occupancies by
restraining tenant activity since early 2020.

Japanese electronics firm Epson's 140,000-SF lease
terminated in November 2020 at 3840 Kilroy Airport Way
in the Kilroy Airport Center, leaving the property 100% vacant. Epson was in the space for over two decades,
having occupied the space since late 1999. The landlord, Kilroy Realty Corporation, has been marketing the entire building for lease since early 2019, when it learned
Epson would not be renewing.

The submarket saw another setback in 19Q3, when the
Port of Long Beach vacated its 180,000-SF
headquarters by the airport at 4801 Airport Plaza Dr. for its recently completed headquarters in Downtown Long
Beach. The property stood 100% vacant for a year,
although Long Beach Public Transportation moved into
45,500 SF in the property this past September.

In July 2020, SCS Engineers renewed its 24,300-SF
lease for an additional three years on its space, as well as committing to an additional 10,000 SF, at the Kilroy Airport Center.

NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing Long Beach: Suburban Office

VACANCY RATE

AVAILABILITY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing Long Beach: Suburban Office
4 & 5 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating RBA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 31,5283780 Kilroy Airport Way
Aero 221,452 8 7.0% 669
5,4133760 Kilroy Airport Way
Aero 166,761 1 10.2% 423
5,0184401 N Atlantic Ave
Bixby Business Center 60,471 1 3.0% 0
10,2895000 E Spring St
Bldg H 166,246 4 6.0% (3,035)
16,0744300 Long Beach Blvd
Long Beach Corporate Center… 137,497 6 7.7% (3,479)
15,9045150 E Pacific Coast Hwy
Park Tower 119,517 5 3.8% (6,657)
3 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating RBA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 5,6125001 Airport Plaza Dr
Bldg B 52,401 1 15.9% 5,612
9,5424265 Conant St
The Terminal at Douglas Park 24,889 2 7.7% 4,356
3,5044010 Watson Plaza Dr 56,901 1 21.0% 3,504
1,4401650 Ximeno Ave
Comerica Bank Bldg 25,086 1 11.6% 2,960
2,5693932 Long Beach Blvd 7,400 1 0% 2,346
2,9083900 Kilroy Airport Way
Aero 130,935 1 9.3% 534
2,6443960 Paramount Blvd 35,686 1 1.5% 230
2,3563738 Bayer Ave 25,301 1 1.9% 0
12,2003950 Paramount Blvd 38,970 3 25.2% (1,285)
4,5075000 Airport Plaza Dr
Bldg A 73,818 1 6.2% (1,971)
3,8942883 E Spring St
Daugherty Sky Harbor Office… 36,302 1 4.2% (3,836)
2,2911501 Hughes Way
Freeway Business Center 78,404 1 3.9% (4,293)
6244510 E Pacific Coast Hwy
Circle Business Center 2 79,764 1 15.5% (5,261)
5813711 Long Beach Blvd 117,386 1 21.5% (6,601)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Rent Long Beach: Suburban Office
Office rental rates in the Suburban Long Beach
Submarket are currently seeing year-over-year gains of

1.7%, compared to flat of 0.0% across the Greater L.A.
office market. Average asking rents in the submarket, at $32.00/SF, are at an over 20% discount to greater
market averages.

MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Rent Long Beach: Suburban Office

MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Construction Long Beach: Suburban Office
The Long Beach Suburban Submarket currently has
several office projects underway. The largest is a build- to-suit for Laserfiche, a software firm that is a leader in enterprise content management, at 3443 Long Beach
Blvd. The 100,000-SF project commenced construction
during summer 2019 and is anticipated to wrap up later
this year. Laserfiche has been in Long Beach since
2001. The firm vacated 63,000 SF up the street at 3545
Long Beach Blvd. in August. Laserfiche owns 3545 Long
Beach Blvd. and is marketing the property for sale or for lease.

Across the street from 3443 Long Beach Blvd., an
18,700-SF medical office property is underway at 3450
Long Beach Blvd. Completion is slated for late 2021.

Supply additions have been modest during the past
decade. The largest completions seen in the area during that time were in the master-planned, mixed-use
Douglas Park near the Long Beach Airport. Five
buildings totaling 134,000 SF delivered in the project in 2017–18.

DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Construction Long Beach: Suburban Office
43,524 17,007 100,000 112,515
All-Time Annual Avg. Square Feet Delivered Square Feet Past 8 Qtrs Delivered Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs Proposed Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs PAST 8 QUARTERS DELIVERIES, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, & PROPOSED

PAST & FUTURE DELIVERIES IN SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Construction Long Beach: Suburban Office

RECENT DELIVERIES
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Sep 202012309 Carson St 2,500 1 May 2021 -
Penelope Anagnos
1 Dec 20184251 Long Beach Blvd 8,559 1 Mar 2021 -
Mike Bardi, D.D.S.
2 Mar 20201000 E New York St
The Vault 5,948 3 Oct 2020 -
Elizabeth J Carnes
3 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Oct 20203443 Long Beach Blvd
Laserfiche 100,000 4 Nov 2021 Urbana Development
Laserfiche®
1 PROPOSED
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Jan 20223810 Stineman Ct
Building #2 33,341 2 Oct 2022 -
Sares-Regis Group
1 Oct 20213009 Long Beach Blvd 30,000 2 Jan 2022 -
Mike Bareh
2 Jan 20223816 Stineman Ct
Building #1 27,460 2 Oct 2022 -
Sares-Regis Group
3 Mar 20223450 Long Beach Blvd 18,714 3 Sep 2023 -
Urbana Development
4 Oct 20212600 California Ave 3,000 1 Oct 2022 -
Sean & Linda Hitchcock
5 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Sales Long Beach: Suburban Office
The Suburban Long Beach Submarket witnessed $48.7
million worth of office sales during the past year. The average modeled market price per SF, $290, and market
cap rate, 6.2%, in the submarket represent a discount to greater market averages.

In March 2021, 3939 Atlantic Ave., a 54,000-SF medical
office asset, traded between two private individuals for $9.9 million ($185/SF). In February 2021, a private buyer purchased 1525 Long Beach Blvd., another medical
office property, from Texas-based Cross Development
for $8 million ($930/SF) at a 5.35% in-place cap rate.

The 8,600-SF property was 100% leased by Fresenius
Kidney Care on a triple net basis.

SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Sales Long Beach: Suburban Office

MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Sales Past 12 Months Long Beach: Suburban Office
16 4.7% $268 7.4%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale

SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS

SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $699,000 $3,463,000 $1,975,000 $9,900,000
Price/SF $162 $268 $336 $930
Cap Rate 3.9% 4.7% 4.8% 5.4%
Time Since Sale in Months 1.0 5.0 5.0 9.3
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 1,900 13,077 7,210 54,103
Stories 1 1 1 2
Typical Floor SF 1,900 7,849 5,107 27,052
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 7.4% 0% 100%
Year Built 1925 1962 1966 1984
Star Rating

2.2 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Sales Past 12 Months Long Beach: Suburban Office
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate

RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 Atlantic Business Center 1983 54,103 0% $9,900,000 $183 3939 Atlantic Ave
3/1/2021 3.9%
-
2 1525 Long Beach Blvd 1949 8,600 0% $7,995,000 $9302/18/2021 5.4% -
3 Cawrey Community Med… 1984 23,215 0% $6,354,000 $274
1703 Termino Ave
12/30/2020 -
-
4 Los Altos Medical Bldg 2 1979 25,400 51.3% $6,283,170 $247 3325 Palo Verde Ave
8/11/2021 -
-
5 Los Altos Medical Bldg 1979 26,000 0% $4,303,336 $166 3320 N Los Coyotes Diag
8/11/2021 -
-
6 4101-4107 Long Beach B… 1951 7,246 0% $2,757,000 $38012/29/2020 - -
7 1040-1042 E Wardlow Rd 1974 4,800 0% $1,975,000 $4119/9/2021 - -
8 1355 Redondo Ave 1980 7,210 0% $1,535,000 $2138/2/2021 - -
9 Elm Avenue Medical Plaza 1982 3,120 6.7% $1,025,000 $329 2650 Elm Ave
3/25/2021 4.3%
-
10 5355 E Carson St 1966 2,372 0% $960,000 $4052/2/2021 - -
9 Elm Avenue Medical Plaza 1982 3,440 0% $917,000 $267
2650 Elm Ave
8/12/2021 5.3%
-
11 1150 E Wardlow Rd 1939 5,107 0% $825,000 $1628/25/2021 - -
12 4301 Atlantic Ave 1953 1,160 0% $720,000 $6216/21/2021 - -
13 3323 Lime Ave 1960 2,009 100% $720,000 $3582/1/2021 - -
14 4709-4711 Long Beach B… 1941 1,900 0% $712,500 $3751/8/2021 - -
15 2429 Pacific Ave 1925 2,040 0% $699,000 $3438/25/2021 - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Supply & Demand Trends Long Beach: Suburban Office

OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (16,001) -0.2% 0.2%18,908 -10,033,800
2024 (24,154) -0.2% 0.1%10,501 -10,049,801
2023 (8,399) -0.1% 0.2%17,376 -10,073,955
2022 (27,024) -0.3% -1.0%(103,141) -10,082,354
2021 98,587 1.0% -2.1%(211,089) -10,109,378
YTD 11,059 0.1% -2.3%(232,020) -10,021,850
2020 5,948 0.1% -1.2%(116,002) -10,010,791
2019 (4,160) 0% -3.8%(385,179) -10,004,843
2018 41,192 0.4% 0.9%93,475 0.410,009,003
2017 87,200 0.9% 1.8%178,145 0.59,967,811
2016 40,000 0.4% 2.6%255,065 0.29,880,611
2015 109,604 1.1% 2.3%221,533 0.59,840,611
2014 19,261 0.2% 2.8%276,272 0.19,731,007
2013 (15,817) -0.2% 0.7%70,553 -9,711,746
2012 (4,500) 0% -1.0%(98,838) -9,727,563
2011 (398,124) -3.9% -2.8%(276,019) -9,732,063
2010 3,600 0% -3.4%(349,312) -10,130,187
2009 133,101 1.3% -1.6%(165,843) -10,126,587
4 & 5 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 10,994 0.4% 1.2%34,261 0.32,966,389
2024 2,897 0.1% 0.7%20,736 0.12,955,395
2023 0 0% -0.3%(8,383) -2,952,498
2022 0 0% -1.4%(40,035) -2,952,498
2021 94,052 3.3% -3.5%(101,924) -2,952,498
YTD 0 0% -6.4%(184,039) -2,858,446
2020 5,948 0.2% 0.7%19,954 0.32,858,446
2019 0 0% -13.7%(389,593) -2,852,498
2018 0 0% 1.9%54,240 02,852,498
2017 0 0% 3.6%102,225 02,852,498
2016 0 0% 1.6%45,107 02,852,498
2015 88,018 3.2% 3.8%108,623 0.82,852,498
2014 38,790 1.4% 7.1%196,285 0.22,764,480
2013 0 0% 1.9%50,761 02,725,690
2012 0 0% -1.8%(48,119) -2,725,690
2011 0 0% -3.8%(103,213) -2,725,690
2010 0 0% -5.6%(153,533) -2,725,690
2009 0 0% 0.1%2,562 02,725,690
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Supply & Demand Trends Long Beach: Suburban Office
3 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 0 0% 0.3%10,290 03,915,888
2024 0 0% 0.4%14,179 03,915,888
2023 18,714 0.5% 0.9%33,615 0.63,915,888
2022 0 0% -0.5%(19,061) -3,897,174
2021 11,059 0.3% -2.7%(104,969) -3,897,174
YTD 11,059 0.3% -1.7%(64,323) -3,897,174
2020 0 0% -2.0%(77,592) -3,886,115
2019 0 0% 1.1%41,977 03,886,115
2018 49,832 1.3% 0.5%18,434 2.73,886,115
2017 90,948 2.4% 3.4%132,144 0.73,836,283
2016 40,000 1.1% 4.0%148,284 0.33,745,335
2015 21,586 0.6% 2.4%88,617 0.23,705,335
2014 (7,000) -0.2% 1.8%68,076 -3,683,749
2013 (1,875) -0.1% 1.7%60,985 -3,690,749
2012 0 0% -2.4%(88,490) -3,692,624
2011 (398,124) -9.7% -4.0%(147,513) -3,692,624
2010 0 0% -5.0%(204,912) -4,090,748
2009 172,090 4.4% -1.6%(64,009) -4,090,748
1 & 2 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (26,995) -0.8% -0.8%(25,643) -3,151,523
2024 (27,051) -0.8% -0.8%(24,414) -3,178,518
2023 (27,113) -0.8% -0.2%(7,856) -3,205,569
2022 (27,024) -0.8% -1.4%(44,045) -3,232,682
2021 (6,524) -0.2% -0.1%(4,196) -3,259,706
YTD 0 0% 0.5%16,342 03,266,230
2020 0 0% -1.8%(58,364) -3,266,230
2019 (4,160) -0.1% -1.2%(37,563) -3,266,230
2018 (8,640) -0.3% 0.6%20,801 -3,270,390
2017 (3,748) -0.1% -1.7%(56,224) -3,279,030
2016 0 0% 1.9%61,674 03,282,778
2015 0 0% 0.7%24,293 03,282,778
2014 (12,529) -0.4% 0.4%11,911 -3,282,778
2013 (13,942) -0.4% -1.3%(41,193) -3,295,307
2012 (4,500) -0.1% 1.1%37,771 -3,309,249
2011 0 0% -0.8%(25,293) -3,313,749
2010 3,600 0.1% 0.3%9,133 0.43,313,749
2009 (38,989) -1.2% -3.2%(104,396) -3,310,149
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Rent & Vacancy Long Beach: Suburban Office

OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 147 3.1% 13.0%$35.95 1,312,810 13.1% -0.3%
2024 143 4.0% 9.6%$34.88 1,347,296 13.4% -0.3%
2023 137 4.6% 5.4%$33.54 1,381,891 13.7% -0.2%
2022 131 0.3% 0.8%$32.07 1,406,743 14.0% 0.8%
2021 131 0.5% 0.5%$31.98 1,329,904 13.2% 3.0%
YTD 132 1.7% 1.3%$32.21 1,256,751 12.5% 2.4%
2020 130 0.8% 0%$31.81 1,013,672 10.1% 1.2%
2019 129 1.9% -0.8%$31.55 890,910 8.9% 3.8%
2018 127 8.7% -2.7%$30.96 509,891 5.1% -0.5%
2017 117 5.4% -10.5%$28.47 562,174 5.6% -1.0%
2016 111 7.0% -15.1%$27.02 653,119 6.6% -2.2%
2015 103 6.9% -20.7%$25.24 868,184 8.8% -1.2%
2014 97 4.7% -25.8%$23.61 980,113 10.1% -2.7%
2013 92 2.9% -29.1%$22.55 1,237,124 12.7% -0.9%
2012 90 2.1% -31.1%$21.91 1,323,494 13.6% 1.0%
2011 88 -1.5% -32.6%$21.45 1,229,156 12.6% -0.7%
2010 89 -3.2% -31.5%$21.79 1,351,261 13.3% 3.5%
2009 92 -7.8% -29.2%$22.52 998,349 9.9% 2.9%
4 & 5 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 151 3.1% 11.0%$40.09 750,172 25.3% -0.9%
2024 147 3.9% 7.7%$38.91 773,479 26.2% -0.6%
2023 141 4.5% 3.6%$37.44 791,353 26.8% 0.3%
2022 135 0.2% -0.8%$35.83 782,970 26.5% 1.4%
2021 135 -0.7% -1.1%$35.75 742,935 25.2% 6.2%
YTD 136 -0.5% -0.3%$36.04 725,050 25.4% 6.4%
2020 136 -0.4% -0.4%$36.01 541,011 18.9% -0.5%
2019 136 0.5% 0%$36.13 554,205 19.4% 13.7%
2018 136 14.3% -0.5%$35.94 164,612 5.8% -1.9%
2017 119 6.4% -13.0%$31.44 218,852 7.7% -3.6%
2016 111 5.0% -18.2%$29.54 321,077 11.3% -1.6%
2015 106 9.6% -22.1%$28.13 366,184 12.8% -1.2%
2014 97 2.5% -29.0%$25.66 386,789 14.0% -6.0%
2013 94 3.6% -30.7%$25.04 544,284 20.0% -1.9%
2012 91 -0.3% -33.1%$24.18 595,045 21.8% 1.8%
2011 92 0.9% -32.9%$24.25 546,926 20.1% 3.8%
2010 91 0.4% -33.5%$24.04 443,713 16.3% 5.6%
2009 90 -9.6% -33.7%$23.95 290,180 10.6% -0.1%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Rent & Vacancy Long Beach: Suburban Office
3 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 146 3.0% 13.2%$37.28 302,437 7.7% -0.3%
2024 142 3.9% 9.9%$36.21 312,727 8.0% -0.4%
2023 137 4.5% 5.8%$34.86 326,906 8.3% -0.4%
2022 131 0.2% 1.3%$33.37 341,807 8.8% 0.5%
2021 131 1.5% 1.1%$33.29 322,746 8.3% 3.0%
YTD 131 3.1% 1.8%$33.54 282,100 7.2% 1.9%
2020 129 -0.4% -0.4%$32.80 206,718 5.3% 2.0%
2019 129 4.1% 0%$32.94 129,126 3.3% -1.1%
2018 124 5.8% -4.0%$31.63 171,103 4.4% 0.8%
2017 117 3.8% -9.3%$29.88 139,705 3.6% -1.2%
2016 113 7.5% -12.6%$28.78 180,901 4.8% -3.0%
2015 105 6.6% -18.8%$26.76 289,185 7.8% -1.9%
2014 98 6.0% -23.8%$25.09 356,216 9.7% -2.0%
2013 93 3.1% -28.1%$23.67 431,292 11.7% -1.7%
2012 90 3.7% -30.3%$22.96 494,152 13.4% 2.4%
2011 87 -1.2% -32.8%$22.13 405,662 11.0% -5.1%
2010 88 -4.9% -32.0%$22.40 656,273 16.0% 5.0%
2009 92 -7.7% -28.5%$23.56 451,361 11.0% 5.5%
1 & 2 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 144 3.2% 14.1%$30.61 260,201 8.3% 0%
2024 139 4.2% 10.5%$29.65 261,090 8.2% 0%
2023 134 4.8% 6.0%$28.44 263,632 8.2% -0.5%
2022 127 0.5% 1.1%$27.14 281,966 8.7% 0.6%
2021 127 0.6% 0.6%$26.99 264,223 8.1% 0%
YTD 128 2.2% 1.2%$27.15 249,601 7.6% -0.5%
2020 126 4.2% 0%$26.84 265,943 8.1% 1.8%
2019 121 0.4% -4.0%$25.76 207,579 6.4% 1.0%
2018 120 6.4% -4.4%$25.65 174,176 5.3% -0.9%
2017 113 6.5% -10.2%$24.09 203,617 6.2% 1.6%
2016 106 8.8% -15.7%$22.63 151,141 4.6% -1.9%
2015 98 4.1% -22.5%$20.80 212,815 6.5% -0.7%
2014 94 5.3% -25.5%$19.98 237,108 7.2% -0.7%
2013 89 1.9% -29.3%$18.97 261,548 7.9% 0.9%
2012 87 2.8% -30.6%$18.61 234,297 7.1% -1.3%
2011 85 -4.8% -32.5%$18.11 276,568 8.3% 0.8%
2010 89 -4.8% -29.1%$19.02 251,275 7.6% -0.2%
2009 94 -6.1% -25.5%$19.98 256,808 7.8% 2.0%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Sale Trends Long Beach: Suburban Office

OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 190- $319.70 6.2%
2024 -- - -- 184- $310.17 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 177- $297.39 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 168- $282.67 6.1%
2021 -- - -- 170- $286.47 6.1%
YTD $38.6M14 1.5% $261.92$3,264,364 1704.7% $286.99 6.2% 2020 $50.6M13 2.3% $222.78$4,115,250 1667.0% $279.23 6.2% 2019 $51.8M22 2.6% $240.17$3,986,063 1655.2% $277.81 6.2% 2018 $79.5M36 3.5% $247.03$3,149,257 1595.9% $267.47 6.1% 2017 $103.1M62 7.0% $180.80$3,889,280 1535.4% $257.84 6.1% 2016 $83.5M40 4.1% $230.48$2,961,185 1475.5% $247.06 6.1% 2015 $45.3M26 2.9% $184.33$2,664,853 1395.9% $234 6.1%
2014 $35.5M19 2.0% $194.50$2,368,100 1297.2% $217.66 6.2% 2013 $31.1M22 2.0% $186.92$1,941,894 1197.9% $200.44 6.4% 2012 $111.2M39 10.1% $121.47$4,711,609 1127.2% $189.28 6.7% 2011 $42.3M19 2.6% $191.79$4,439,385 108- $181.18 6.9%
2010 $24M11 3.0% $142.55$4,000,833 988.6% $164.57 7.4%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 4 & 5 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 179- $305.28 6.1%
2024 -- - -- 173- $296.02 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 166- $283.87 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 158- $269.99 6.1%
2021 -- - -- 160- $273.74 6.1%
YTD -- - -- 163- $277.77 6.1%
2020 -- - -- 158- $269.70 6.2%
2019 -- - -- 158- $269.82 6.1%
2018 -- - -- 153- $260.59 6.1%
2017 $12M2 5.4% $78.55$6,000,000 148- $253.43 6.0%
2016 $25.8M1 4.2% $215.58$25,765,000 1427.5% $242.43 6.0% 2015 -- - -- 138- $235.30 5.9%
2014 $16M1 2.6% $223.93$16,000,000 1298.5% $221.17 6.0% 2013 -- - -- 120- $205.55 6.2%
2012 $83.3M2 24.4% $124.92$41,625,000 1156.8% $196.21 6.4% 2011 $21.5M1 4.4% $179.89$21,500,215 111- $188.84 6.6%
2010 $16M1 4.4% $133.87$16,000,000 100- $171.57 7.1%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Sale Trends Long Beach: Suburban Office
3 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 188- $316.64 6.2%
2024 -- - -- 182- $307.71 6.2%
2023 -- - -- 175- $295.48 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 167- $281.30 6.2%
2021 -- - -- 169- $285.52 6.2%
YTD $6.3M2 0.8% $203.84$3,139,168 169- $285.02 6.2%
2020 $37.6M5 4.8% $200.50$9,098,000 1647.0% $276.62 6.3% 2019 $38.7M6 4.6% $231.69$9,664,706 1645.3% $276.84 6.2% 2018 $57.8M15 6.2% $245.55$5,976,167 1585.2% $266.39 6.2% 2017 $49M25 6.9% $212.61$8,617,000 1536.1% $257.49 6.1% 2016 $28.1M9 2.5% $305.34$3,126,722 1475.0% $248.18 6.1% 2015 $17.8M2 2.5% $194.13$8,887,500 1407.4% $235.38 6.1% 2014 $1.1M1 0.3% $112.14$1,100,000 131- $220.20 6.2%
2013 $21.5M3 2.8% $208.80$7,167,230 1217.9% $203.43 6.4% 2012 $13.3M8 2.6% $159.20$2,611,750 1147.2% $192.48 6.6% 2011 $13.7M5 2.1% $187.39$5,659,500 109- $183.23 6.8%
2010 $875K1 0.2% $89.20$875,000 98- $165.58 7.3%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 1 & 2 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 203- $336.38 6.1%
2024 -- - -- 197- $325.88 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 188- $311.86 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 178- $295.75 6.1%
2021 -- - -- 180- $299.10 6.1%
YTD $32.3M12 3.6% $277.27$3,292,186 1804.7% $297.70 6.1% 2020 $13M8 1.2% $328.36$1,623,875 176- $290.95 6.2%
2019 $13.2M16 2.3% $269.11$1,462,222 1735.0% $286.17 6.2% 2018 $21.8M21 3.3% $251.03$1,453,111 1666.3% $274.98 6.1% 2017 $42.1M35 8.5% $225.06$2,341,500 1584.0% $262.26 6.1% 2016 $29.6M30 5.9% $196.51$1,611,537 1515.1% $249.92 6.1% 2015 $27.5M24 6.0% $178.51$1,835,167 1394.4% $231.19 6.2% 2014 $18.4M17 3.4% $181.73$1,417,038 1286.5% $211.46 6.4% 2013 $9.6M19 2.8% $151.29$736,048 116- $192.25 6.7%
2012 $14.7M29 6.8% $88.59$862,941 1087.6% $179.20 6.9%
2011 $7.1M13 1.7% $253.78$1,189,208 104- $171.81 7.2%
2010 $7.1M9 5.3% $182.50$1,782,500 958.6% $157.05 7.6%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Long Beach: Suburban

PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Retail Submarket Report
Los Angeles - CA

RETAIL SUBMARKET REPORT
Submarket Key Statistics 1
Leasing 2
Rent 5
Construction 6
Sales 9
Sales Past 12 Months 11
Supply & Demand Trends 13
Rent & Vacancy 16
Sale Trends 19
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview Long Beach: Suburban Retail
42K 42.4K 4.3% -0.2%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth Vacancies for retail properties in Long Beach:

Suburban were under the five-year average during the
fourth quarter, but they were essentially unchanged from this time last year. The rate also comes in below the
region's average. Meanwhile, retail rents have slipped
over the past year, falling by -0.2%.

In terms of development, Long Beach: Suburban has
received an injection of new supply over the past few
years, and the pipeline is still churning during the fourth quarter.

Long Beach: Suburban is a very liquid investment
market, characterized by heavy trading, and the market
proved to be liquid yet again this past year. At $335/SF, market pricing is considerably lower than the region's
average pricing.

The coronavirus' impact on the market may lead to
lasting structural changes within the retail sector. E- commerce has flourished, and spending and shopping
habits may be permanently altered, particularly as brick- and-mortar retailers may be unable to adapt to the
changing environment.

KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$28.7250.9%266,049Malls 50.9% 0 0 0
$35.121.9%1,922,281Power Center 2.9% 0 0 0
$29.215.0%3,486,857Neighborhood Center 7.5% 0 0 0
$27.033.1%1,327,494Strip Center 3.3% 1,000 0 0
$25.512.9%6,214,079General Retail 4.1% (1,600) 0 4,940
--0Other - 0 0 0
$28.104.3%13,216,760Submarket 5.7% (600) 0 4,940
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When

3.9%4.0%0%Vacancy Change (YOY) 5.5% 2021 Q2 2.0% 2006 Q2 44,317(4,385)42.4KNet Absorption SF 282,783 2010 Q4 (235,470) 2009 Q2 35,96130,93942KDeliveries SF 154,230 2006 Q4 0 2015 Q3

2.8%1.2%-0.2%Rent Growth 5.4% 2007 Q2 -5.5% 2009 Q4
N/A$97M$116MSales Volume $232.3M 2020 Q1 $35.2M 2010 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Leasing Long Beach: Suburban Retail

NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY

VACANCY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing Long Beach: Suburban Retail

AVAILABILITY RATE
4 & 5 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating GLA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 9,4501820-2004 Ximeno Ave
Vons Circle Center 118,658 2 0.8% 2,470
1,462141 E Willow St 22,000 1 13.1% 1,475
1,6491775 Ximeno Ave
PAD 2 6,200 1 30.6% 83
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing Long Beach: Suburban Retail
3 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating GLA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 5,5402115-2131 N Bellflower Blvd 18,000 1 0% 5,058
2,5703377-3395 Long Beach Blvd
Wardlow Plaza 12,361 2 10.3% 2,570
1,716321 E Willow St 4,000 1 0% 1,567
1,4564201-4221 E Willow St 9,121 1 9.6% 1,456
1,0003410-3430 Long Beach Blvd 6,601 1 9.1% 1,000
4,3503578-3599 N Los Coyotes Diag…
Los Coyotes Shopping Center 31,998 1 14.9% 770
6823203 E Anaheim St 682 1 20.0% 682
1,63511421 E Carson St 10,358 1 3.2% 142
9004215-4275 Atlantic Ave 20,740 1 4.3% 78
46420314 Norwalk Blvd 4,160 1 4.5% 40
1,5755555 E Stearns St 34,429 1 0% 0
1,3003000 Cherry Ave 17,395 1 17.3% 0
43,13012120 Carson St
Hawaiian Gardens Towne Ce… 43,130 1 0% 0
3603768 Long Beach Blvd 1,888 2 0% 0
2,9001601-1629 E Pacific Coast 2,900 1 0% 0
8194600-4782 E Pacific Coast Hwy
Circle Marina Center 84,625 1 6.8% (124)
3,5751002-1030 Pacific Coast Hwy 25,148 1 14.2% (1,620) 1,0153400-3500 Los Coyotes Diag 16,863 1 38.1% (1,996)
2,0687621-7679 E Carson St 92,187 1 10.5% (2,068)
3,4408105-8195 E Wardlow Rd
El Dorado Center 82,492 2 11.0% (2,692)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Rent Long Beach: Suburban Retail

MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)

MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Construction Long Beach: Suburban Retail

DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Construction Long Beach: Suburban Retail
45,160 51,839 4,940 22,463
All-Time Annual Avg. Square Feet Delivered Square Feet Past 8 Qtrs Delivered Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs Proposed Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs PAST 8 QUARTERS DELIVERIES, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, & PROPOSED

PAST & FUTURE DELIVERIES IN SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Construction Long Beach: Suburban Retail

RECENT DELIVERIES
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner May 20206325 E Spring St 42,000 1 Apr 2021 -
Stuart Kaplan
1 Jul 20192229 N Lakewood Blvd 3,600 2 Sep 2020 -
Jalal Tabatabeian
2 Jan 20195865 E Spring St
The Coffee Bean & Tea L… 1,839 1 Jul 2020 -
Tadashi D. Nakase
3 Jan 20194500 E Atherton St
Raising Cane's 4,400 1 Oct 2019 -
Black Equities Group, LLC
4 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Aug 202012300 E Carson St 2,940 1 Nov 2021 -
Golcheh Developments and Inve…
1 Apr 20202590 N Lakewood Blvd 2,000 1 Nov 2021 -
Ara Tchaghlassian
2 PROPOSED
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner May 2022530 E 33rd St 15,963 1 May 2022 -
John Wallace Russell
1 Oct 20213115 Long Beach Blvd 6,500 1 Jan 2022 -
David J Curry Living Trust
2 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Sales Long Beach: Suburban Retail
Investors have been especially active in the capital
markets in Long Beach: Suburban, making it one of the
most heavily traded submarkets in the region over the
past several years. Annual sales volume has averaged
$125 million over the past five years, including a 12-
month high of $232 million over that stretch. The
recorded transaction volume here reached $116 million in the past year. General retail drove that volume.

Market pricing, based on the estimated price movement
of all properties in the submarket, sat at $335/SF during the fourth quarter of 2021. That market price is largely unchanged since last year, as values have held steady,
but the price itself still sits far below the overall average for Los Angeles. Market cap rates are within a few basis points of their year-ago levels, at 5.5%, which is pretty similar to the metro.

There is still uncertainty in the capital markets thanks to the coronavirus pandemic. Although investment volume
has held up relatively well, some investors may need to see signs of sustained economic growth before engaging
in the submarket.

SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Sales Long Beach: Suburban Retail

MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Sales Past 12 Months Long Beach: Suburban Retail
49 5.4% $190 1.4%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale

SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS

SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $350,000 $2,360,551 $1,000,000 $16,000,000
Price/SF $44 $190 $279 $2,311
Cap Rate 3.9% 5.4% 5.0% 7.3%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.1 6.5 7.1 11.2
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 702 13,006 3,750 177,607
Stories 1 1 1 3
Typical Floor SF 675 10,879 3,588 177,607
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 1.4% 0% 100%
Year Built 1919 1968 1962 2020
Star Rating

2.4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Sales Past 12 Months Long Beach: Suburban Retail
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate

RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 Ross, Petco, Dollar Tree 2006 56,460 0% $16,000,000 $283 3055-3075 California Ave
3/19/2021 6.1%
-
2 Sears 1996 144,000 0% $11,700,000 $81
2100 N Bellflower Blvd
9/8/2021 -
-
3 1670 W Pacific Coast Hwy 1999 5,758 0% $10,000,000 $1,73712/31/2020 - -
4 CVS 2009 13,452 0% $9,250,000 $688
5505 E Carson St
11/9/2020 4.3%
-
5 2800 Cherry Ave 1992 177,607 0% $7,900,000 $441/5/2021 - -
6 959-999 E Spring St 2015 6,535 0% $6,625,000 $1,0141/5/2021 4.9% -
7 1002-1030 Pacific Coast… 1962 25,148 14.2% $4,400,000 $1758/27/2021 5.4% -
8 The Coffee Bean & Tea L… 2020 1,839 0% $4,250,000 $2,311 5865 E Spring St
3/5/2021 3.9%
-
9 Jack In The Box 2008 2,400 0% $3,315,000 $1,381
801 E Spring St
2/5/2021 4.4%
-
10 2850 Cherry Ave 1992 30,867 0% $2,750,000 $1781/4/2021 - -
10 2850 Cherry Ave 1992 30,867 0% $2,750,000 $1781/4/2021 - -
11 Applebees's 2013 5,500 0% $2,364,000 $430
899 E Spring St
3/18/2021 5.0%
-
12 12112-12122 Centralia Rd 1963 16,500 0% $2,250,000 $13612/22/2020 - -
13 101 W Pacific Coast Hwy 2006 3,481 0% $2,015,000 $5795/20/2021 - -
14 7-Eleven 1945 3,010 0% $1,985,000 $659
1960 Santa Fe Ave
2/1/2021 4.8%
-
15 2023 E 19th St 1940 1,720 0% $1,510,000 $8787/14/2021 - -
16 2185-2189 Pacific Ave 1958 6,612 0% $1,453,000 $2208/21/2021 6.2% -
17 500 E Willow St 1988 4,630 0% $1,425,000 $30812/16/2020 - -
18 311 W Willow St 1971 5,760 0% $1,400,000 $2436/25/2021 - -
19 3722 Atlantic Ave 1948 3,658 0% $1,355,000 $3706/30/2021 - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Supply & Demand Trends Long Beach: Suburban Retail

OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 29,348 0.2% 0.2%26,479 1.113,247,505
2024 24,039 0.2% 0.3%34,115 0.713,218,157
2023 2,256 0% 0.3%41,471 0.113,194,118
2022 (24,199) -0.2% 0.1%14,920 -13,191,862
2021 41,301 0.3% 0.8%109,219 0.413,216,061
YTD 42,000 0.3% 1.0%125,750 0.313,216,760
2020 (43,958) -0.3% -0.6%(75,223) -13,174,760
2019 14,467 0.1% 0.7%94,093 0.213,218,718
2018 (11,622) -0.1% -0.3%(41,681) -13,204,251
2017 21,591 0.2% -0.5%(61,477) -13,215,873
2016 (5,096) 0% -0.5%(69,167) -13,194,282
2015 274,242 2.1% -1.0%(133,307) -13,199,378
2014 7,756 0.1% 1.1%144,003 0.112,925,136
2013 23,994 0.2% 0.3%45,132 0.512,917,380
2012 (20,674) -0.2% -0.3%(34,911) -12,893,386
2011 110,555 0.9% -0.4%(49,305) -12,914,060
2010 20,104 0.2% 2.2%282,783 0.112,803,505
2009 50,304 0.4% -1.2%(148,592) -12,783,401

MALLS SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 2,714 1.0% 1.4%3,706 0.7271,781
2024 2,462 0.9% 2.7%7,135 0.3269,067
2023 1,111 0.4% 4.5%11,985 0.1266,605
2022 (433) -0.2% 0.6%1,724 -265,494
2021 (122) 0% 6.4%17,026 -265,927
YTD 0 0% 7.1%18,900 0266,049
2020 0 0% 8.5%22,628 0266,049
2019 3,867 1.5% 33.2%88,417 0266,049
2018 5,200 2.0% -- -262,182
2017 0 0% -22.8%(58,500) -256,982
2016 0 0% -- -256,982
2015 - - -76.9%(197,682) -256,982
2014 - - -- --
2013 - - -- --
2012 - - -- --
2011 - - -- --
2010 - - -- --
2009 - - -- --
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Supply & Demand Trends Long Beach: Suburban Retail

POWER CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (2,779) -0.1% -0.1%(2,827) -1,909,077
2024 (2,834) -0.1% -0.1%(1,930) -1,911,856
2023 (3,162) -0.2% 0%(880) -1,914,690
2022 (3,558) -0.2% 0%593 -1,917,852
2021 (871) 0% 6.5%124,220 -1,921,410
YTD 0 0% 6.6%126,963 01,922,281
2020 0 0% -6.3%(121,513) -1,922,281
2019 0 0% -1.2%(23,967) -1,922,281
2018 0 0% -0.5%(10,500) -1,922,281
2017 0 0% 0.9%17,833 01,922,281
2016 0 0% -0.1%(2,500) -1,922,281
2015 0 0% -0.9%(17,833) -1,922,281
2014 0 0% -0.1%(2,026) -1,922,281
2013 0 0% 1.0%18,960 01,922,281
2012 0 0% -0.3%(6,460) -1,922,281
2011 0 0% 0%0 -1,922,281
2010 0 0% 10.3%197,754 01,922,281
2009 0 0% -6.8%(130,128) -1,922,281

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 11,904 0.3% 0.3%9,918 1.23,504,184
2024 10,335 0.3% 0.4%13,465 0.83,492,280
2023 2,780 0.1% 0.5%16,004 0.23,481,945
2022 (6,122) -0.2% 0.1%3,871 -3,479,165
2021 (1,570) 0% -2.2%(76,297) -3,485,287
YTD 0 0% -1.9%(66,282) -3,486,857
2020 0 0% 0.6%21,073 03,486,857
2019 0 0% 0.7%25,588 03,486,857
2018 0 0% 0.2%5,499 03,486,857
2017 0 0% -0.6%(19,225) -3,486,857
2016 0 0% -1.6%(55,793) -3,486,857
2015 6,535 0.2% 2.1%72,205 0.13,486,857
2014 0 0% 0.3%11,406 03,480,322
2013 5,500 0.2% -0.7%(24,528) -3,480,322
2012 0 0% 1.2%40,932 03,474,822
2011 105,198 3.1% 1.7%58,727 1.83,474,822
2010 0 0% -0.6%(19,933) -3,369,624
2009 0 0% -1.4%(46,758) -3,369,624
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Supply & Demand Trends Long Beach: Suburban Retail

STRIP CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 1,448 0.1% 0%304 4.81,326,677
2024 1,150 0.1% 0.1%1,029 1.11,325,229
2023 (490) 0% 0.2%2,008 -1,324,079
2022 (2,388) -0.2% 0%310 -1,324,569
2021 (537) 0% 1.7%23,191 -1,326,957
YTD 0 0% 1.9%24,563 01,327,494
2020 0 0% -0.9%(11,466) -1,327,494
2019 0 0% -0.8%(10,049) -1,327,494
2018 0 0% 1.3%17,705 01,327,494
2017 0 0% -1.0%(13,191) -1,327,494
2016 0 0% 1.5%19,410 01,327,494
2015 0 0% 1.1%14,385 01,327,494
2014 14,576 1.1% 4.1%54,090 0.31,327,494
2013 18,494 1.4% 0.5%5,951 3.11,312,918
2012 9,939 0.8% 2.2%28,961 0.31,294,424
2011 2,800 0.2% -3.0%(39,115) -1,284,485
2010 0 0% 1.4%17,763 01,281,685
2009 36,967 3.0% 4.9%63,395 0.61,281,685

GENERAL RETAIL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 16,061 0.3% 0.2%15,378 1.06,235,786
2024 12,926 0.2% 0.2%14,416 0.96,219,725
2023 2,017 0% 0.2%12,354 0.26,206,799
2022 (11,698) -0.2% 0.1%8,422 -6,204,782
2021 44,401 0.7% 0.3%21,079 2.16,216,480
YTD 42,000 0.7% 0.3%21,606 1.96,214,079
2020 (43,958) -0.7% 0.2%14,055 -6,172,079
2019 10,600 0.2% 0.2%14,104 0.86,216,037
2018 (16,822) -0.3% -0.9%(54,385) -6,205,437
2017 21,591 0.3% 0.2%11,606 1.96,222,259
2016 (5,096) -0.1% -0.5%(30,284) -6,200,668
2015 10,725 0.2% -0.1%(4,382) -6,205,764
2014 (6,820) -0.1% 1.3%80,533 -6,195,039
2013 0 0% 0.7%44,749 06,201,859
2012 (30,613) -0.5% -1.6%(98,344) -6,201,859
2011 2,557 0% -1.1%(68,917) -6,232,472
2010 20,104 0.3% 1.4%87,199 0.26,229,915
2009 13,337 0.2% -0.6%(35,101) -6,209,811
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Rent & Vacancy Long Beach: Suburban Retail

OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 129 2.1% 12.9%$31.94 495,283 3.7% 0%
2024 127 3.2% 10.6%$31.29 494,994 3.7% -0.1%
2023 123 4.6% 7.2%$30.34 506,501 3.8% -0.3%
2022 117 3.1% 2.5%$28.99 544,917 4.1% -0.3%
2021 114 0.4% -0.6%$28.13 581,381 4.4% -0.5%
YTD 114 -0.2% -0.7%$28.10 565,146 4.3% -0.6%
2020 113 -1.0% -1.0%$28.01 648,896 4.9% 0.3%
2019 115 2.1% 0%$28.29 617,631 4.7% -0.6%
2018 112 2.3% -2.1%$27.70 697,257 5.3% 0.2%
2017 110 3.5% -4.3%$27.07 674,996 5.1% 0.6%
2016 106 3.1% -7.5%$26.16 591,928 4.5% 0.5%
2015 103 4.5% -10.3%$25.37 527,857 4.0% 1.1%
2014 98 4.2% -14.2%$24.28 377,290 2.9% -1.1%
2013 94 3.3% -17.6%$23.30 513,537 4.0% -0.2%
2012 91 1.3% -20.2%$22.57 534,675 4.1% 0.1%
2011 90 -0.9% -21.3%$22.27 520,438 4.0% 1.2%
2010 91 -3.7% -20.6%$22.48 360,578 2.8% -2.1%
2009 95 -5.5% -17.5%$23.34 623,257 4.9% 1.5%

MALLS RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 121 -0.6% -0.9%$28.95 118,356 43.5% -0.8%
2024 122 0.4% -0.3%$29.13 119,366 44.4% -2.2%
2023 122 1.7% -0.7%$29.01 124,063 46.5% -4.3%
2022 120 0% -2.4%$28.52 134,953 50.8% -0.7%
2021 120 -0.2% -2.3%$28.53 137,090 51.6% -6.4%
YTD 120 -0.5% -1.7%$28.72 135,304 50.9% -7.1%
2020 120 -2.1% -2.1%$28.59 154,204 58.0% -8.5%
2019 122 2.4% 0%$29.21 176,832 66.5% -33.2%
2018 120 2.7% -2.4%$28.51 261,382 99.7% 0%
2017 116 3.9% -5.0%$27.75 256,182 99.7% 22.8%
2016 112 3.7% -8.6%$26.70 197,682 76.9% 0%
2015 108 5.5% -11.8%$25.75 197,682 76.9% -
2014 102 4.8% -16.4%$24.41 0 - -
2013 98 4.2% -20.2%$23.29 0 - -
2012 94 2.1% -23.4%$22.36 0 - -
2011 92 -0.3% -25.0%$21.90 0 - -
2010 92 -3.6% -24.8%$21.97 0 - -
2009 96 -4.5% -22.0%$22.78 0 - -
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Rent & Vacancy Long Beach: Suburban Retail

POWER CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 136 2.2% 12.4%$40.14 31,223 1.6% 0%
2024 133 3.3% 10.0%$39.28 31,105 1.6% 0%
2023 129 4.8% 6.5%$38.02 31,942 1.7% -0.1%
2022 123 3.2% 1.6%$36.30 34,160 1.8% -0.2%
2021 119 0.6% -1.5%$35.18 38,253 2.0% -6.5%
YTD 119 -0.5% -1.7%$35.12 36,337 1.9% -6.6%
2020 118 -2.1% -2.1%$34.95 163,300 8.5% 6.3%
2019 121 2.4% 0%$35.71 41,787 2.2% 1.2%
2018 118 2.7% -2.3%$34.88 17,820 0.9% 0.5%
2017 115 3.9% -4.9%$33.96 7,320 0.4% -0.9%
2016 111 3.7% -8.4%$32.71 25,153 1.3% 0.1%
2015 107 5.4% -11.7%$31.54 22,653 1.2% 0.9%
2014 101 4.7% -16.2%$29.92 4,820 0.3% 0.1%
2013 97 4.0% -20.0%$28.58 2,794 0.1% -1.0%
2012 93 2.0% -23.0%$27.49 21,754 1.1% 0.3%
2011 91 -0.3% -24.5%$26.95 15,294 0.8% 0%
2010 92 -3.2% -24.3%$27.03 15,294 0.8% -10.3%
2009 95 -5.4% -21.8%$27.93 213,048 11.1% 6.8%

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 130 2.0% 12.8%$33.15 158,482 4.5% 0%
2024 128 3.1% 10.5%$32.49 156,787 4.5% -0.1%
2023 124 4.6% 7.2%$31.51 160,079 4.6% -0.4%
2022 118 3.0% 2.5%$30.13 173,370 5.0% -0.3%
2021 115 0.4% -0.5%$29.24 183,112 5.3% 2.1%
YTD 115 -0.2% -0.6%$29.21 174,553 5.0% 1.9%
2020 114 -0.9% -0.9%$29.12 108,271 3.1% -0.6%
2019 115 2.0% 0%$29.39 129,344 3.7% -0.7%
2018 113 2.4% -2.0%$28.82 154,932 4.4% -0.2%
2017 110 3.6% -4.3%$28.13 160,431 4.6% 0.6%
2016 107 3.5% -7.6%$27.17 141,206 4.0% 1.6%
2015 103 4.7% -10.7%$26.26 85,413 2.4% -1.9%
2014 98 4.1% -14.6%$25.09 151,083 4.3% -0.3%
2013 95 3.2% -18.0%$24.10 162,489 4.7% 0.9%
2012 92 1.4% -20.5%$23.36 132,461 3.8% -1.2%
2011 90 -1.0% -21.6%$23.03 173,393 5.0% 1.2%
2010 91 -3.5% -20.8%$23.27 126,922 3.8% 0.6%
2009 95 -5.3% -17.9%$24.12 106,989 3.2% 1.4%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Rent & Vacancy Long Beach: Suburban Retail

STRIP CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 123 2.1% 14.2%$30.81 38,663 2.9% 0.1%
2024 121 3.2% 11.8%$30.17 37,820 2.9% 0%
2023 117 4.7% 8.3%$29.22 37,964 2.9% -0.2%
2022 112 3.1% 3.5%$27.91 40,209 3.0% -0.2%
2021 108 0.3% 0.3%$27.07 42,598 3.2% -1.8%
YTD 108 0.1% 0.2%$27.03 41,730 3.1% -1.9%
2020 108 0.3% 0%$26.98 66,293 5.0% 0.9%
2019 108 2.3% -0.3%$26.89 54,827 4.1% 0.8%
2018 105 2.4% -2.6%$26.28 44,778 3.4% -1.3%
2017 103 2.1% -4.9%$25.65 62,483 4.7% 1.0%
2016 101 2.6% -6.8%$25.13 49,292 3.7% -1.5%
2015 98 4.2% -9.2%$24.51 68,702 5.2% -1.1%
2014 94 3.4% -12.8%$23.52 83,087 6.3% -3.1%
2013 91 2.2% -15.6%$22.75 122,601 9.3% 0.8%
2012 89 0.8% -17.4%$22.27 110,058 8.5% -1.5%
2011 88 -1.6% -18.1%$22.10 129,080 10.0% 3.2%
2010 90 -4.4% -16.7%$22.46 87,165 6.8% -1.4%
2009 94 -6.0% -13.0%$23.48 104,928 8.2% -2.4%

GENERAL RETAIL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 128 2.2% 13.5%$29.10 148,559 2.4% 0%
2024 125 3.2% 11.1%$28.49 149,916 2.4% 0%
2023 121 4.7% 7.6%$27.59 152,453 2.5% -0.2%
2022 116 3.2% 2.8%$26.35 162,225 2.6% -0.3%
2021 112 0.4% -0.4%$25.54 180,328 2.9% 0.4%
YTD 112 -0.1% -0.5%$25.51 177,222 2.9% 0.3%
2020 112 -0.8% -0.8%$25.45 156,828 2.5% -0.9%
2019 113 2.1% 0%$25.64 214,841 3.5% -0.1%
2018 110 2.1% -2.0%$25.12 218,345 3.5% 0.5%
2017 108 3.5% -4.0%$24.61 188,580 3.0% 0.2%
2016 105 2.7% -7.3%$23.77 178,595 2.9% 0.4%
2015 102 4.0% -9.7%$23.14 153,407 2.5% 0.2%
2014 98 4.2% -13.3%$22.24 138,300 2.2% -1.4%
2013 94 3.2% -16.8%$21.34 225,653 3.6% -0.7%
2012 91 1.1% -19.4%$20.68 270,402 4.4% 1.1%
2011 90 -1.0% -20.3%$20.44 202,671 3.3% 1.1%
2010 91 -3.8% -19.5%$20.65 131,197 2.1% -1.1%
2009 94 -5.6% -16.3%$21.47 198,292 3.2% 0.8%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Sale Trends Long Beach: Suburban Retail

OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 184- $381.17 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 181- $375.30 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 176- $364.97 5.5%
2022 -- - -- 167- $347.03 5.5%
2021 -- - -- 162- $336.63 5.5%
YTD $87.7M38 4.1% $161.23$2,306,632 1625.5% $335.30 5.5% 2020 $131.6M48 2.5% $396.36$2,741,906 1605.8% $332.62 5.5% 2019 $171.1M71 4.0% $349.59$3,111,682 1596.0% $331.01 5.5% 2018 $59.7M77 2.5% $279.83$1,357,187 1525.3% $315.53 5.6% 2017 $129.3M139 6.8% $389.49$2,228,486 1475.6% $305.72 5.6% 2016 $110.8M82 3.4% $306.28$2,014,002 1445.7% $298.10 5.6% 2015 $127.8M69 4.1% $282.89$2,661,504 1375.0% $283.81 5.7% 2014 $87.6M78 3.3% $289.43$2,085,062 1236.9% $256.34 6.0% 2013 $66.4M63 2.6% $255.57$1,443,890 1087.6% $223.97 6.4% 2012 $86.4M46 4.1% $205.16$2,469,257 1026.4% $212.45 6.6% 2011 $88.6M58 3.5% $258.07$2,953,283 936.6% $192.79 6.9% 2010 $35.2M32 2.2% $189.08$1,529,603 877.8% $181.55 7.2% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.

POWER CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 179- $430.05 5.2%
2024 -- - -- 176- $423.05 5.2%
2023 -- - -- 171- $411.02 5.1%
2022 -- - -- 163- $390.35 5.1%
2021 -- - -- 158- $378.09 5.2%
YTD $11.7M1 7.5% $81.25$11,700,000 157- $376.44 5.2%
2020 -- - -- 156- $374.98 5.2%
2019 -- - -- 157- $376.95 5.2%
2018 -- - -- 149- $357.48 5.3%
2017 -- - -- 145- $348.30 5.3%
2016 -- - -- 141- $339.15 5.3%
2015 -- - -- 135- $323.25 5.3%
2014 -- - -- 123- $294.06 5.6%
2013 $6.5M7 0.7% $453.95$928,333 108- $258.15 6.0%
2012 -- - -- 102- $245.63 6.1%
2011 -- - -- 94- $224.43 6.4%
2010 -- - -- 88- $211.81 6.7%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Sale Trends Long Beach: Suburban Retail

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 183- $355.43 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 180- $350.08 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 176- $340.57 5.4%
2022 -- - -- 167- $323.95 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 162- $314.35 5.5%
YTD $28.3M4 2.0% $399.24$7,076,000 1615.1% $313.13 5.5% 2020 $36.2M9 2.7% $387.36$4,019,556 161- $312.27 5.5%
2019 $94.9M5 7.0% $388.95$18,978,200 161- $311.48 5.4%
2018 $3.4M1 0.1% $787.86$3,350,000 151- $292.63 5.6%
2017 $22.4M17 9.6% $385.44$4,470,000 146- $282.57 5.6%
2016 $29.2M1 1.5% $560.03$29,150,000 1444.6% $279.29 5.6% 2015 $52.4M10 6.7% $223.81$5,235,050 136- $263.64 5.7%
2014 $20.2M3 2.3% $257.74$6,729,380 122- $236.27 6.0%
2013 $1.3M1 0% $1,608.60$1,274,012 107- $208.42 6.4%
2012 $56.6M11 7.1% $300.83$5,657,500 1027.0% $198.24 6.5% 2011 $72M13 8.0% $261.80$6,000,000 93- $180.09 6.9%
2010 $16M3 2.3% $205.68$5,348,627 87- $169.27 7.2%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.

STRIP CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 180- $416.43 5.6%
2024 -- - -- 177- $409.61 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 172- $397.91 5.5%
2022 -- - -- 163- $377.96 5.5%
2021 -- - -- 158- $366.35 5.5%
YTD $4.4M1 1.9% $174.96$4,400,000 1575.4% $364.82 5.6%
2020 $11M2 1.4% $590.52$5,476,500 1555.1% $358.93 5.6%
2019 $8.8M6 2.1% $322.67$1,466,487 1545.5% $356.18 5.6% 2018 $13.2M6 3.3% $344.88$2,647,664 1495.6% $346.55 5.6% 2017 $22.4M17 7.5% $401.02$2,802,250 1455.6% $337 5.6%
2016 $20.7M10 4.0% $436.71$2,300,759 1415.1% $328.11 5.6% 2015 $24.6M5 3.6% $631.50$6,158,250 1364.6% $315.41 5.7% 2014 $24.5M7 5.0% $370.92$3,500,697 1246.5% $288.47 6.0% 2013 $19.2M9 8.0% $232.97$3,201,667 1087.3% $250.47 6.4% 2012 $7.6M7 2.8% $265.60$1,527,600 1037.0% $238.03 6.5% 2011 $2.5M2 0.7% $268.59$1,230,000 936.7% $216.03 6.9%
2010 -- - -- 88- $203.54 7.1%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 21 Sale Trends Long Beach: Suburban Retail

GENERAL RETAIL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 188- $369.33 5.7%
2024 -- - -- 185- $363.24 5.6%
2023 -- - -- 180- $352.84 5.6%
2022 -- - -- 171- $335.12 5.6%
2021 -- - -- 165- $324.67 5.6%
YTD $43.2M32 4.9% $142.45$1,351,500 1655.8% $323.30 5.7% 2020 $84.5M37 3.6% $383.81$2,283,311 1636.0% $319.86 5.6% 2019 $67.5M60 4.2% $308.96$1,533,013 1616.0% $316.89 5.7% 2018 $43.1M70 4.6% $252.56$1,134,945 1555.2% $303.67 5.7% 2017 $84.5M105 7.5% $387.60$1,877,426 1505.5% $293.98 5.7% 2016 $60.9M71 5.6% $232.32$1,353,628 1456.1% $284.61 5.8% 2015 $50.8M54 4.1% $284.14$1,493,197 1385.1% $271.66 5.9% 2014 $42.9M68 4.6% $271.08$1,339,988 1256.9% $244.99 6.2% 2013 $39.4M46 3.4% $242.95$1,232,394 1087.7% $212.67 6.6% 2012 $22.2M28 3.8% $108.65$1,110,550 1025.8% $200.98 6.8% 2011 $14.1M43 2.6% $239.11$883,655 936.5% $181.75 7.2%
2010 $19.1M29 3.2% $177.10$956,750 877.8% $171.15 7.4%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 22 Los Angeles - CA

PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Office Market Report

OFFICE MARKET REPORT
Market Key Statistics 1
Leasing 2
Rent 6
Construction 9
Under Construction Properties 11
Sales 13
Sales Past 12 Months 15
Economy 17
Market Submarkets 22
Supply & Demand Trends 29
Rent & Vacancy 31
Sale Trends 33
Los Angeles Office
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview Los Angeles Office
3M (6.6M) 13.7% 0%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth The Los Angeles office market continues to see
conditions deteriorate. Vacancies continue to rise at a rapid clip, and sublease space continues to be at record levels. Rental rates are down from a peak in 20Q1, and
while rates have held flat in 2021, concessions and other incentives have been more generous for tenants than
prior to the pandemic based on notable leases recently
signed.

Pre-pandemic, tech and entertainment firms were key
drivers of leasing demand during the past several years.

Many tech firms are now facing pains, as blocks of
sublease space put on the market last year by this cohort of tenants in Silicon Beach suggests all is not well for the sector. The entertainment industry also supported robust demand, with major studios and the digital upstarts in the midst of a content production arms race. While overall
tenant activity will likely be subdued for at least the near term, there is some life in the leasing market as there have been several large leases signed in recent months
by some of L.A.'s more dynamic, innovative tenants.

The Los Angeles office market is unique among major
markets nationally for the decentralized nature of its
office stock. This is a product of the sprawling nature of the metropolis as well as its well-earned reputation for having some of the nation's worst traffic. Companies
need to be strategic in where they locate. The most
prestigious office locations have long been on the
Westside. Addresses in submarkets such as Century
City, Beverly Hills, and Brentwood evoke a certain cachet and typically attract more traditional and image-
conscious tenants. Heading west from those submarkets
takes one to Silicon Beach, Los Angeles' tech epicenter, which includes Santa Monica, Venice, Marina Del Rey,
and Playa Vista.

Current office construction levels in L.A. have come
down from recent peaks, but activity remains high from a historical perspective. Projects with little preleasing may be hard-pressed to secure tenants in the current leasing environment.

Office sales volume in L.A. in recent quarters has been below activity seen in the years leading up to the
pandemic. Some investors have taken a wait-and-see
approach since the onset of the pandemic. Average
market pricing peaked at the beginning of 2020, and
there has been little movement since. Several recent
large transactions of higher-quality assets garnered
strong pricing and suggest discounts may not become
the norm for all office sales in L.A. post-pandemic.

Looking ahead, it's uncertain to what extent pricing could be impacted longer term. Some are debating how office
tenants will utilize space in the future.

KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$47.5718.9%169,248,6124 & 5 Star 23.7% (175,982) 0 5,748,299 $39.0212.1%155,685,7443 Star 15.1% (210,818) 0 432,665
$33.927.6%105,306,3631 & 2 Star 9.5% (78,779) 0 10,135
$41.2213.7%430,240,719Market 17.2% (465,579) 0 6,191,099 Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When

14.2%10.7%2.1%Vacancy Change (YOY) 13.7% 2021 Q4 6.8% 2007 Q3 13,249948,711(6.6M)Net Absorption SF 12,910,310 2000 Q1 (9,819,352) 2021 Q1 1,814,6112,366,9203MDeliveries SF 4,462,310 2002 Q3 628,148 1997 Q1

2.5%3.3%0%Rent Growth 14.9% 2007 Q3 -11.0% 2009 Q3
N/A$5.2B$4.3BSales Volume $11.5B 2017 Q3 $762.6M 2009 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Leasing Los Angeles Office
Negative net absorption persists in Los Angeles' office market. Occupancies have not seen this pace of erosion
in over a decade. Market vacancy currently stands at

13.7%, the highest level seen in CoStar's data set that goes back to 1996.

One major concern is the record levels of available
sublease space in the market. While it appears levels
peaked in 21Q1, the square footage available, 9.7 million SF as of early October, is down only by 450,000 SF and
remains at record levels. There is still over 4 million more SF of sublease space than was being marketed before
the onset of the pandemic. Availabilities are especially elevated in Westside submarkets.

Although market fundamentals continue to erode, there
have been several notable leases recently inked. Deals
between WeWork and Alo Yoga in Beverly Hills and
WeWork and FabFitFun in West Hollywood stand out.

Alo Yoga took 73,000 SF at 9830 Wilshire, and
FabFitFun 53,000 SF at the Pacific Design Center,
Green Building during 21Q3. The two leases executed
with WeWork are prime examples of firms utilizing flex
space options during the pandemic. Whether it is to
avoid longer-term lease commitments or to secure
highly amenitized space to appeal to today's workers,
some companies see the value proposition of flex space
during uncertain times.

Santa Monica has seen several major deals executed in
recent months. In June, streaming giant Hulu renewed
and expanded its offices by 90,000 SF, or 35%, at the
Colorado Center. Hulu now controls 350,000 SF at the
complex, and its lease term now runs through 2028. Also that month, Snap, the parent company of app Snapchat,
expanded its footprint by 145,000 SF, or almost 50%, at the Santa Monica Business Park. Snap is the largest
tenant in the complex and will now occupy almost
450,000 SF. In April, streaming firm Roku signed a 10-
year, 72,000-SF lease at the Colorado Center.

Looking ahead, market vacancy is forecast to continue to expand through next year. Recent leasing activity
remains below pre-pandemic levels, and the market
does have several million SF that will deliver in the
coming quarters that have significant space availabilities.

NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing Los Angeles Office

VACANCY RATE

AVAILABILITY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing Los Angeles Office
12 MONTH NET ABSORPTION SF IN SELECTED BUILDINGS
3rd Qtr
Building Name/Address Submarket Bldg SF Vacant SF
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 4th Qtr 12 Month
Net Absorption SF
Inglewood/South LA 450,872 161,887 0 9 288,976 0 288,985Hollywood Park El Segundo 281,110 0 0 281,110 0 0 281,110888 North Douglas Culver City 241,205 0 0 241,205 0 0 241,205Ivy Station
Santa Clarita Valley 170,000 0 0 170,000 0 0 170,00027918 Franklin Pky Downtown Los Angeles 160,000 0 160,000 0 0 0 160,000LA3 Burbank 351,300 0 0 0 149,937 0 149,937Burbank Empire Center 190th Street Corridor 241,866 12,388 131,006 0 0 0 131,006Hamilton Place Culver City 128,000 0 128,000 0 0 0 128,0008777 Washington Downtown Los Angeles 145,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,521The Exchange Downtown Los Angeles 1,154,306 7,123 0 (7,123) 0 0 118,899Wells Fargo Center - South Tower Miracle Mile 462,375 123,094 0 (94,728) 201,452 0 106,724Wilshire Courtyard Culver City 94,082 0 0 94,082 0 0 94,082Exposition 3
El Segundo 92,373 0 0 0 92,373 0 92,3732221 Park Pl
Eastern SGV 287,930 0 91,374 0 0 0 91,374San Gabriel Valley Corporate C… El Segundo 259,106 80,615 10,869 (173) 0 0 90,856555 S Aviation Blvd Marina Del Rey/Venice 296,737 3,100 0 84,616 0 0 84,616The Brickyard Marina Del Rey/Venice 182,955 93,166 0 0 0 0 81,981Water's Edge 4,999,217 481,373 521,249 768,998 732,738 0 2,431,669Subtotal Primary Competitors 425,241,502 58,389,798 (2,869,085) (1,796,831) (1,532,164) (465,579) (9,048,368)Remaining Los Angeles Market 430,240,719 58,871,171 (2,347,836) (1,027,833) (799,426) (465,579) (6,616,699)Total Los Angeles Market 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Leasing Los Angeles Office
TOP OFFICE LEASES PAST 12 MONTHS
Building Name/Address Submarket Leased SF Tenant Name Tenant Rep Company Leasing Rep CompanyQtr Century Park * Century City 302,911 Creative Artists Agency Cresa CBREQ2 21 888 North Douglas El Segundo 281,110 Beyond Meat Inc. JLL CBRE;Newmark Knight…Q1 21 Colorado Center * Santa Monica 185,787 Hulu - LA Realty PartnersQ2 21 400 S Hope St * Downtown Los Angeles 159,768 O'Melveny & Myers LLP CBRE CBREQ4 20 Colorado Center * Santa Monica 158,649 Hulu - LA Realty PartnersQ2 21 Shoreline Square Tower * Long Beach: Downtown 151,238 US Customs & Border Pro… Cushman & Wakefield CBREQ1 21 Santa Monica Business Park Santa Monica 145,060 Snap, Inc. - CBREQ2 21 Apollo at Rosecrans * El Segundo 137,000 Fabletics, Inc. Madison Partners CBREQ3 21 Hamilton Place 190th Street Corridor 124,285 County of Los Angeles - Newmark Knight FrankQ1 21 California Plaza * Downtown Los Angeles 120,000 Skadden - JLLQ2 21 City National Plaza * Downtown Los Angeles 109,120 Jones Day - CommonWealth Partne…Q1 21 888 North Douglas El Segundo 107,878 L'Oréal USA - CBRE;Newmark Knight…Q2 21 Pen Factory Santa Monica 87,822 GoodRx - CBREQ2 21
5454 Beethoven St Marina Del Rey/Venice 87,526 Activision Publishing, Inc. Savills CBREQ3 21 Pasadena Business Center Pasadena 83,083 Xencor JLL CBREQ2 21 The Brick and The Machine Culver City 82,553 Apple, Inc. - CBREQ3 21 The Reserve * Marina Del Rey/Venice 79,461 Sony Pictures Entertainment - JLLQ2 21 9830 Wilshire Blvd Beverly Hills 73,000 Alo LLC - WeWorkQ3 21 Colorado Center Santa Monica 72,019 Roku, Inc. Colliers International LA Realty PartnersQ2 21 Sunset Las Palmas Studios Hollywood 70,285 Company 3 Newmark CBREQ1 21 555 S Aviation Blvd El Segundo 65,442 Belkin International CBRE Tishman SpeyerQ1 21 The Platform Culver City 60,875 Technicolor - CresaQ3 21 Santa Monica Business Park Santa Monica 60,656 Snap, Inc - CBREQ4 20 The Platform Culver City 60,000 Scopely CBRE Runyon GroupQ2 21 Del Rey Marina Del Rey/Venice 58,034 Electronic Arts, Inc. - CBREQ4 20 1360 E 6th St Downtown Los Angeles 57,000 DC Stages and Sets - CBREQ1 21 Pacific Design Center West Hollywood 53,427 FabFitFun CBRE Cushman & WakefieldQ3 21 Conjunctive Points Culver City 52,065 - - First Property Realty C…Q3 21 Playa Jefferson * Marina Del Rey/Venice 49,187 Facebook - -Q1 21 Atria West Westwood 48,151 Agency for the Performing… JLL Cushman & WakefieldQ3 21 Headquarters Bldg * Western SGV 47,852 Xencor - -Q4 20
The Plant * East San Ferndo Vlly 47,165 Lenny & Larry's Inc - NAI CapitalQ2 21 Pasadena Business Center Pasadena 46,640 Xencor JLL CBREQ2 21 ROW DTLA / 767 S Alameda Downtown Los Angeles 46,589 Ghost Management Group - -Q4 20 8501 Washington Blvd Culver City 44,899 Anonymous Content - Industry PartnersQ3 21 Century Park Century City 42,876 Kayne Anderson Rudnick JLL SavillsQ3 21 Pasadena Tech Center * Pasadena 42,757 Cogent Communications Avison Young CBREQ4 20 Continental Grand * El Segundo 42,714 Regus - JLLQ2 21
Media Studios Burbank 40,675 - - CBREQ2 21
City National Plaza Downtown Los Angeles 40,140 Clark Hill - CommonWealth Partne…Q2 21 Renewal
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Rent Los Angeles Office
2021 has seen office asking rates in the L.A. metro hold by and large flat. Landlords are budging little on asking rates, which demonstrates relative confidence that better tenant demand will soon resurface. However, based on
several recent notable leases, concessions and other
lease terms have become more generous for tenants
than prior to the pandemic.

Average office asking rates in Los Angeles stand at
$41.00/SF. Rents in the metro declined modestly last
year. The L.A. office market saw rents increase by 50%
from 2011 through early 2020. L.A. outpaced the nation
during this time, which saw cumulative gains under 40%.

Rent growth in L.A. got as high as 8.5% in early 2016
and witnessed annual gains above inflation through
2019.

Most submarkets on the Westside, including Brentwood,
the Olympic Corridor, and Santa Monica, have been
more adversely impacted since the onset of the
pandemic. Contributing factors leading to relative
underperformance are likely that these locations have
some of the more expensive office space in the L.A.
metro and have seen sublease space rise considerably
since the onset of the pandemic. Conversely, submarkets that offer relative value, like Torrance and Miracle Mile, have fared better during this period.

Given the current weak leasing environment and still
record levels of available sublease space, which is
typically offered at a discount, in L.A., it will be difficult for landlords to significantly push rental rates for at least the near term.

MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Rent Los Angeles Office

MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
4 & 5 STAR EXPENSES PER SF (ANNUAL)
Utilities Cleaning InsuranceMarket / Cluster Taxes Other Total Los Angeles $1.64 $1.16$0.82 $5.20 $7.78 $16.60
Antelope Valley $1.28 $0.88$0.60 $3.03 $5.42 $11.21
Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena $1.67 $1.12$1.08 $4.96 $5.90 $14.73 Downtown Los Angeles $1.94 $0.74$1.03 $4.56 $12.52 $20.79 Mid-Cities $1.06 $0.57$0.70 $3.34 $6.47 $12.14
Mid-Wilshire $1.74 $1.03$0.66 $5.19 $8.50 $17.12
San Fernando Valley $1.46 $1.04$0.77 $4.46 $6.11 $13.84 San Gabriel Valley $1.73 $0.99$0.86 $3.87 $5.15 $12.60
Santa Clarita Valley $1.42 $0.84$0.80 $4.30 $4.51 $11.87 South Bay $1.38 $0.95$0.66 $5.42 $6.58 $14.99
Southeast Los Angeles $1.87 $1.01$0.76 $2.86 $6.12 $12.62 West Los Angeles $1.72 $1.66$0.79 $6.26 $8.64 $19.07
Expenses are estimated using NCREIF, Trepp, IREM, and CoStar data using the narrowest possible geographical definition from Zip Code to region. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Rent Los Angeles Office
3 STAR EXPENSES PER SF (ANNUAL)
Utilities Cleaning InsuranceMarket / Cluster Taxes Other Total Los Angeles $1.35 $0.61$0.69 $4.23 $4.29 $11.17
Antelope Valley $0.94 $0.72$0.55 $3 $3 $8.21
Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena $1.47 $0.57$0.75 $3.69 $4.47 $10.95 Downtown Los Angeles $1.84 $0.61$0.96 $2.78 $8.28 $14.47 Mid-Cities $0.82 $0.43$0.56 $3.64 $3.07 $8.52
Mid-Wilshire $1.62 $0.69$0.63 $4.37 $4.71 $12.02
NE LA County Outlying $1.34 $0.67$0.69 $1.42 $4.58 $8.70 NW LA County Outlying $1 $0.75$0.57 $3.14 $3.15 $8.61
San Fernando Valley $1.10 $0.79$0.65 $3.73 $3.71 $9.98
San Gabriel Valley $1.65 $0.58$0.79 $3.79 $2.72 $9.53
Santa Clarita Valley $0.82 $0.52$0.63 $4.24 $2.32 $8.53 South Bay $1.24 $0.39$0.60 $4.11 $4.42 $10.76
Southeast Los Angeles $1.58 $0.44$0.67 $3.33 $3.58 $9.60 West Los Angeles $1.32 $0.72$0.71 $6.12 $5.51 $14.38
Expenses are estimated using NCREIF, Trepp, IREM, and CoStar data using the narrowest possible geographical definition from Zip Code to region. 1 & 2 STAR EXPENSES PER SF (ANNUAL)
Utilities Cleaning InsuranceMarket / Cluster Taxes Other Total Los Angeles $1.03 $0.42$0.62 $3.87 $2.36 $8.30
Antelope Valley $0.75 $0.18$0.54 $2.54 $2.56 $6.57
Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena $1.24 $0.49$0.71 $3.68 $2.16 $8.28 Downtown Los Angeles $0.81 $0.39$0.57 $2.84 $5.86 $10.47 East LA County Outlying $1.16 $0.45$0.70 $1.58 $2.04 $5.93 Mid-Cities $0.73 $0.29$0.52 $3.11 $2.94 $7.59
Mid-Wilshire $1.25 $0.56$0.57 $4.50 $2.73 $9.61
NE LA County Outlying $1.30 $0.53$0.76 $1.02 $1.87 $5.48 San Fernando Valley $0.89 $0.43$0.57 $3.69 $1.61 $7.19
San Gabriel Valley $1.15 $0.44$0.73 $3.52 $1.78 $7.62
Santa Clarita Valley $0.74 $0.35$0.63 $4.73 $2.22 $8.67 South Bay $0.86 $0.19$0.57 $3.59 $2.16 $7.37
Southeast Los Angeles $0.73 $0.21$0.60 $2.76 $2.90 $7.20 West Los Angeles $1.15 $0.57$0.60 $5.19 $2.77 $10.28
Expenses are estimated using NCREIF, Trepp, IREM, and CoStar data using the narrowest possible geographical definition from Zip Code to region. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Construction Los Angeles Office
Looking at recent deliveries, in Inglewood, the 450,000- SF NFL Media Building recently delivered in 21Q2. NFL
inked a deal for half the space in the building in early 2018 and announced that it would move its headquarters
from Culver City. Developers of the NFL Media Building, Wilson Meany, still need to lease almost 50% of the
building to reach full occupancy. The building is a
pioneering location for top-tier office product in L.A. and has yet to become a proven location in terms of seeing
sustained leasing from higher-profile tenants.

Also that quarter, 280,000 SF of Hackman Capital
Partners' 888 North Douglas campus redevelopment in
El Segundo delivered. Beyond Meat occupies this portion of the 30-acre complex that was once home to Northrop
Grumman. There is another 108,000 SF under
construction in the campus that's fully preleased by
L'Oreal that will soon deliver.

There is 6.2 million SF of office space under construction in Greater Los Angeles, down from a recent high of over 8 million SF in 20Q3 but still elevated relative to activity during the past two decades. Burbank and West Los
Angeles stand out for having some of the largest projects underway.

In Burbank, in 2019, Warner Brothers announced it
would be moving into a new $1 billion, Frank Gehry-
designed headquarters on the Burbank Studios lot. Work
commenced in early 2020 on the firm's 800,000-SF two-
tower campus. Work is expected to wrap up in 2023.

Once completed, Warner Brothers will purchase the
campus.

West Los Angeles had seen little in the way of new office stock during the past 20 years. However, the lull in
construction changed dramatically with the renovation of the former Westside Pavilion Mall into creative office
space. In early 2019, Google announced that it would
take almost 600,000 SF in the project. Hackman Capital
Partners commenced work on the conversion toward the
end of 2019, and completion is anticipated for 2022.

Additionally, the former Macy's department store at the site is under renovation and, when completed, will add
230,000 SF of office space. Completion is expected in
the coming months.

DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Construction Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET CONSTRUCTION
Average Building Size
RankUnder Constr
Under Construction Inventory
All ExistingSF (000) Pre-Leased SF (000)SubmarketNo. RankBldgs Pre-Leased % 1 Burbank 15 1,038 69,17577.1% 4 23,286800 9
2 West Los Angeles 2 813 406,60471.8% 5 10,086584 2
3 Olympic Corridor 3 811 270,4042.9% 8 29,85723 3
4 Culver City 10 690 69,02531.9% 7 19,671220 10
5 Downtown Los Angeles 4 483 120,75054.3% 6 152,151262 5 6 Koreatown 1 468 468,000100% 1 39,700468 1
7 Hollywood 3 359 119,604100% 1 26,004359 6
8 Marina Del Rey/Venice 2 319 159,4251.2% 9 22,5654 4
9 Pasadena 2 220 110,0991.0% 10 20,1902 7
10 El Segundo 2 174 86,93981.0% 3 68,780141 8
All Other 22 816 37,09471.6% 19,556584
Totals 66 6,191 93,80555.7% 24,5193,448
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Under Construction Properties Los Angeles Office
66 6,191,099 1.4% 55.7%
Properties Square Feet Percent of Inventory Preleased

UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROPERTIES

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Nov 201910800-10900 W Pico Blvd
One Westside 584,000 5 Apr 2022 Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.

The Macerich Company
1 Feb 202011355-11377 W Olympic…
LUMEN West LA 553,475 10 Jan 2022 McCarthy Cook & Co.

Northwood Investors LLC
2 Oct 2018510-550 S Vermont Ave
LA County Department… 468,000 20 Nov 2021 Trammell Crow Company County of Los Angeles
3 Sep 20203000 W Alameda Ave
Second Century Expansi… 445,000 9 Jan 2023 Worthe Real Estate Group Worthe Real Estate Group
4 Sep 20203000 W Alameda Ave
Second Century Expansi… 355,000 7 Jan 2023 Worthe Real Estate Group Worthe Real Estate Group
5 Nov 20196181 Centinela Ave
Entrada 315,000 6 Nov 2021 Lincoln Property Company
Lincoln Property Company
6 Jan 201910730 W Pico Blvd
West End 229,208 3 Nov 2021 Goldstein Planting Investments Goldstein Planting Investments
7 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Under Construction Properties Los Angeles Office

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Jul 202012101 W Olympic Blvd
West Edge 223,062 8 Aug 2022 Hines
Hines
8 Jun 201910 W Walnut St
10 West 217,976 5 Nov 2021 Lincoln Property Company
Lincoln Property Company
9 Jan 20181355 Vine St
Academy South 183,129 5 Nov 2021 Kilroy Realty Corporation Kilroy Realty Corporation
10 Sep 20185790 W Jefferson Blvd
(W)rapper 180,550 16 Jun 2022 -
Samitaur Constructs
11 Jan 20181375 Vine St
Academy North 159,236 6 Nov 2021 Kilroy Realty Corporation Kilroy Realty Corporation
12 Apr 2019700 S Main St
7Main 138,000 4 Nov 2021 Urban Offerings
GEM Realty Capital, Inc.
13 Feb 2021843 N Spring St 127,000 5 Aug 2022 Redcar Properties LTD Redcar Properties LTD
14 Oct 20192130 Violet St 113,000 10 Jan 2022 Lowe Enterprises, Inc.

The Related Companies
15 Jun 2019888 N Douglas St 107,878 1 Jan 2022 Hackman Capital Partners Hackman Capital Partners
16 Aug 20213609 S 10th Ave 107,199 3 Sep 2022 -
The Luzzatto Company
17 Jan 2020520 Mateo St 105,000 6 Nov 2022 Carmel Partners Carmel Partners
18 May 20212901 Pacific Coast Hwy 100,000 2 May 2022 -
-
19 Oct 20203443 Long Beach Blvd
Laserfiche 100,000 4 Nov 2021 Urbana Development
Laserfiche®
20 Mar 20181041 N Formosa Ave
Courtyard at The Lot 97,742 6 Nov 2021 -
CIM Group, LP
21 Apr 20212922 Crenshaw Blvd 89,056 3 Dec 2022 -
CIM Group, LP
22 Jan 20209735 Washington Blvd
The Brick and The Machi… 82,553 4 Jan 2022 Clarett West Development DLJ Real Estate Capital Partners
23 Mar 20215950 W Jefferson Blvd 80,300 4 Apr 2022 -
Richard Hirsch
24 Jun 201918422 Oxnard St
Building 6 77,591 3 Nov 2021 Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC
25 Jun 20188888 Washington Blvd
The Platform - Phase III 67,837 4 Dec 2021 Runyon Group Runyon Group
26 Sep 20193200 N Sepulveda Blvd 66,000 2 Nov 2021 DWS
DWS
27 Apr 20169133 Garvey Ave
Garvey Media Center 62,000 5 Dec 2021 Asia-Pacific California Inc Asia-Pacific California Inc
28 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Sales Los Angeles Office
Office transaction volume in Los Angeles during the past 12 months, $4.2 billion, was well below the market's 10- year annual average of $7.2 billion. The pandemic has
had an impact on office sales activity. However, despite slow activity and questions around the future of the office sector, recent sales show some investors are still willing to make significant bets in the sector.

This August, in Pasadena, a private investor purchased a three-building portfolio for $80 million ($355/SF). 2 N Lake Ave., a 200,000-SF office property, was the largest property in the transaction. The sale also included a
20,000-SF building at 911 E Colorado Blvd., a one-
story, 1,300-SF retail building, as well as a six-story parking garage. The properties were 63% leased at the
time of sale. Given the occupancy of the portfolio, the sale demonstrates an investor willing to take on leasing risk in the middle of the pandemic.

In July, Hyundai Motor Company acquired from Cardinal
Real Estate Investors 2221 Park Place, a 90,000-SF
property, for $70 million ($760/SF). The property was
originally a 58,000-SF office property that Cardinal
renovated and expanded. Work wrapped up on the
redevelopment in early 2021. Cardinal acquired the
property in 2019 for $31 million. WeWork had preleased
the entire property during renovations but backed out of the lease in 2020. Hyundai purchased the building to
occupy for its operations.

Office properties oriented toward the entertainment
industry have been in high demand over the past year. In July, New York-based Prospect Ridge Advisors acquired
from UBS Realty Investors two assets at the Burbank
Empire Center Complex, 2350 Empire Ave. and 2400
Empire Ave. Prospect purchased the properties,
comprising 234,000 SF, for $106.7 million ($455/SF).

The buildings were 100% leased at the time of sale. UBS acquired the assets back in 2015 from CBRE Global
Investors for $80.4 million ($345/SF).

Thinking further ahead, there could be structural changes to office demand that could impact office values in the metro. The great work-from-home experiment of the
past year has already led some office users to rethink
their office needs as those firms allow more employees
to work remotely or have flexible schedules. If there is a secular decline in office use, this would negatively impact pricing in Los Angeles as well as the nation.

SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Sales Los Angeles Office

MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Sales Past 12 Months Los Angeles Office
688 5.3% $426 11.1%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale

SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS

SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $45,000 $7,348,900 $2,250,000 $196,000,000
Price/SF $1.07 $426 $394 $3,401
Cap Rate 1.7% 5.3% 5.3% 12.1%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.0 5.4 4.9 12.0
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 621 17,546 5,916 388,126
Stories 1 2 2 22
Typical Floor SF 1 7,846 4,115 120,452
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 11.1% 0% 100%
Year Built 1900 1965 1962 2021
Star Rating

2.3 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Sales Past 12 Months Los Angeles Office
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate

RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 NineFifteen 1980 388,126 7.3% $196,000,000 $505
915 Wilshire Blvd
12/17/2020 -
-
2 9050 Washington Blvd 1996 130,356 0% $119,784,587 $9191/26/2021 - -
3 West Building 2015 139,305 9.0% $98,466,087 $707
6555 Barton Ave
12/14/2020 -
-
4 5250 Lankershim Blvd 2009 179,741 23.2% $92,000,000 $5128/26/2021 - -
5 East Bldg 2015 122,161 8.5% $87,533,913 $717
959 Seward St
12/14/2020 -
-
6 Beverly Hills Medical Plaza 1989 67,510 9.3% $81,500,000 $1,207 150 N Robertson Blvd
10/8/2021 -
-
7 Building 230, 233,234 1966 238,795 0% $80,249,810 $336 3100 W Lomita Blvd
8/23/2021 5.5%
-
8 The Park Calabasas 1986 222,524 7.6% $79,000,000 $355 4500 Park Granada
4/1/2021 6.5%
-
9 Building D 1946 37,484 0% $78,855,708 $2,104
2043 Colorado Ave
10/23/2020 -
-
10 Archway Medical Plaza 1958 50,730 9.1% $74,400,000 $1,467 9033 Wilshire Blvd
3/19/2021 4.6%
-
11 Bldg 232 1966 252,372 4.1% $74,244,108 $294
3121 Skypark Dr
8/23/2021 5.5%
-
12 Pasadena Business Center 1956 240,904 23.9% $72,500,000 $301 465 N Halstead St
6/30/2021 -
-
13 2 N Lake Ave 1985 203,911 43.7% $70,997,707 $3488/18/2021 - -
14 2221 Park Pl 2021 92,373 0% $70,000,000 $7587/28/2021 - -
15 Westwood Atrium 1985 107,484 0% $65,000,000 $605
1440 S Sepulveda Blvd
10/1/2021 -
-
16 The Switchyard 2019 106,004 100% $64,257,688 $606
500 S Santa Fe Ave
5/20/2021 -
-
17 2400 Empire Ave 2002 134,784 0% $63,975,022 $4757/2/2021 - -
18 THE LINK 1981 124,785 33.7% $61,500,000 $493
2901 W Alameda Ave
5/25/2021 4.7%
-
19 Pacific Gateway 1982 237,145 14.6% $55,500,000 $234
19191 S Vermont Ave
10/13/2020 5.9%
-
20 601 N Nash St 1954 52,000 0% $52,000,000 $1,0007/30/2021 - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Economy Los Angeles Office
The Los Angeles economy is recovering slowly from the
pandemic, a trend that followed the Great Recession
when the local economy was slower to recover than
other areas. The metro unemployment rate, after seeing
a sustained improvement for months in the second half
of last year, has plateaued above 10%. New coronavirus
cases, as well as deaths, have temporarily spiked due to variants, but schools reopened and restrictions have
eased.

Los Angeles' position as the entertainment capital of the world and the increased demand for video streaming and
social media had been a boon to the L.A. economy
during the past several years. The pandemic accelerated demand for streaming services, although studios have
targeted theater only releases for 2022, assuming
widespread adoption of vaccinations. The entertainment
business directly or indirectly employs one out of five workers in L.A. County. Content creators have banked
studio space and made investments focused on the
future of the industry. Warner Bros. is currently under construction on its 800,000 SF Second Century
expansion in Burbank. Studio space is at a premium in
the Hollywood, Burbank, and Glendale neighborhoods,
and warehouses in neighboring areas are taking
advantage of that demand with creative industrial
conversions.

Tourism is important for the local economy and the
impact to this sector and its employees has been
considerable. Before the pandemic, over 500,000 people
in the county were employed in the leisure and
hospitality industry. The city had more than 50 million visitors in 2019, but the pandemic severely impacted
travel. Stores, restaurants, and lodging in tourist hotspots like Downtown L.A., Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and Santa Monica have been particularly impacted. However, the
market is set for a major rebound as large events such
as the 2022 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympics spur the
hospitality and retail sectors.

The industrial sector has sustained growth through the
pandemic as warehousing demands increased by
ecommerce retail operations. A backup at the ports has
led to a record number of ships waiting to unload cargo.

Continued bottlenecks, however, could soon become a
headwind for LA's industrial market if conditions at the ports don't improve. The need for warehousing space
and limited land has led to developers targeting infill development sites that can be scraped for modern
warehouse construction. The overall Southern California industrial market, which includes the five county area of Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside and
Orange Counties recently surpassed 2 billion SF of
industrial inventory.

As more of a structural issue that needs to be addressed long term, the prohibitive cost of housing in L.A. is a major impediment to hiring and is often cited as a
motivating factor for companies to relocate to other parts of the country. Recent departures include construction
giant AECOM. However, the aerospace industry is strong
and major employers such as SpaceX, Rocket Lab and
Relativity Space help sustain the diverse Los Angeles
economy.

Despite near-term issues related to the pandemic, the
metro economy possesses many positive attributes. It
has two major talent generators in USC and UCLA along
with top tier universities such as Cal Tech that support a growing tech economy. It is perennially among the top
five metros in the country for venture capital investment.

The metro is an attractive location for immigrants and
educated talent. More people making six-figure
paychecks continue to move to L.A. than are leaving.

Education levels, while below the national average,
improve every year.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Economy Los Angeles Office

LOS ANGELES EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN THOUSANDS
Industry Jobs LQ MarketUS USMarketUSMarket
CURRENT JOBS CURRENT GROWTH 10 YR HISTORICAL 5 YR FORECAST -0.16%-0.46%0.75%-1.58%4.89%2.74%0.9319Manufacturing

0.25%0.69%1.00%0.90%4.55%7.36%1.0831Trade, Transportation and Utilities

0.22%0.72%0.49%0.16%3.56%6.87%0.9405 Retail Trade

0.52%0.49%1.46%0.53%2.47%4.21%0.9222Financial Activities

0.82%1.11%-0.11%-0.14%-0.10%-0.26%0.9546Government

0.56%0.69%2.65%3.78%5.68%7.21%0.7158Natural Resources, Mining and Construction

1.14%1.37%1.84%2.59%6.02%6.29%1.2870Education and Health Services

1.09%1.10%2.03%1.46%6.99%7.92%1.0620Professional and Business Services

1.64%3.29%0.56%0.12%7.33%13.44%2.3193Information

2.55%4.74%1.19%1.42%15.31%21.08%1.0458Leisure and Hospitality

0.76%2.77%0.56%-0.28%5.40%9.66%0.8137Other Services
Total Employment 4,354 1.0 7.27% 5.46% 0.99% 1.18% 1.48% 0.89% Source: Oxford Economics
LQ = Location Quotient
Source: Oxford Economics

JOB GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Economy Los Angeles Office
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE (%)

NET EMPLOYMENT CHANGE (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Economy Los Angeles Office

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
POPULATION GROWTH (YOY %)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 21 Economy Los Angeles Office

NET POPULATION CHANGE (YOY)

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
12 Month ChangeCurrent Level
Metro USMetro USDemographic Category
10 Year Change
Metro US Metro US
5 Year Forecast
Population 330,367,5009,903,349 -0.4% 0.2% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.5% Households 123,394,6093,288,566 -0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% 0% 0.4% Median Household Income $74,364$83,172 6.1% 6.0% 4.8% 4.0% 2.9% 2.5% Labor Force 162,784,4695,037,628 2.9% 1.5% 0.3% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% Unemployment 5.8%10.0% -5.6% -2.9% -0.2% -0.3% - -
Source: Oxford Economics

POPULATION GROWTH
Source: Oxford Economics

LABOR FORCE GROWTH

INCOME GROWTH
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 22 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

LOS ANGELES SUBMARKETS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 23 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 1 190th Street Corridor 5,175 1.2% 29 0 - - -74 0 0 0% - 2 Antelope Valley 4,484 1.0% 31 1 40 0.9% 20396 1 10 0.2% 18 3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 6,143 1.4% 26 1 100 1.6% 12514 0 0 0% - 4 Beverly Hills 11,313 2.6% 12 1 50 0.4% 18314 0 0 0% - 5 Brentwood 4,212 1.0% 35 0 - - -60 0 0 0% -
6 Burbank 15,066 3.5% 8 15 1,038 6.9% 1647 1 4 0% 20
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 7,243 1.7% 24 0 - - -211 0 0 0% - 8 Catalina Island - 0% - 0 - - -- 0 0 - -
9 Century City 11,455 2.7% 11 0 - - -43 0 0 0% -
10 Culver City 9,757 2.3% 18 10 690 7.1% 4496 7 526 5.4% 1 11 Downtown Los Angeles 68,924 16.0% 1 4 483 0.7% 5453 2 285 0.4% 4 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 4,180 1.0% 36 3 56 1.3% 17431 3 16 0.4% 16 13 East LA County Outlying 12 0% 46 0 - - -5 0 0 0% -
14 Eastern SFV 6,928 1.6% 25 0 - - -543 0 0 0% -
15 Eastern SGV 18,692 4.3% 3 3 36 0.2% 211,270 0 0 0% - 16 El Segundo 18,364 4.3% 4 2 174 0.9% 10267 5 412 2.2% 3 17 Encino 4,973 1.2% 30 0 - - -86 0 0 0% -
18 Glendale 13,663 3.2% 9 1 4 0% 23843 2 15 0.1% 17
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 2,866 0.7% 41 0 - - -265 2 69 2.4% 12 20 Hollywood 10,480 2.4% 14 3 359 3.4% 7403 3 190 1.8% 7 21 Inglewood/South LA 4,248 1.0% 34 0 - - -409 1 451 10.6% 2 22 Koreatown 15,840 3.7% 7 1 468 3.0% 6399 0 0 0% -
23 LAX 4,143 1.0% 37 0 - - -55 0 0 0% -
24 Long Beach: Downtown 8,265 1.9% 22 0 - - -274 0 0 0% - 25 Long Beach: Suburban 10,022 2.3% 15 1 100 1.0% 12508 3 16 0.2% 15 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 11,124 2.6% 13 2 319 2.9% 8493 4 178 1.6% 8 27 Mid-Cities 11,741 2.7% 10 3 27 0.2% 221,131 0 0 0% - 28 Miracle Mile 6,019 1.4% 27 0 - - -121 0 0 0% -
29 NE LA County Outlying 6 0% 47 0 - - -2 0 0 0% -
30 North Hollywood 3,519 0.8% 39 0 - - -318 2 257 7.3% 5 31 NW LA County Outlying 1 0% 48 0 - - -1 0 0 0% -
32 Olympic Corridor 4,329 1.0% 32 3 811 18.7% 3145 1 73 1.7% 9 33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 810 0.2% 44 0 - - -57 0 0 0% - 34 Park Mile 2,072 0.5% 42 0 - - -100 0 0 0% -
35 Pasadena 18,797 4.4% 2 2 220 1.2% 9931 0 0 0% -
36 Santa Clarita Valley 5,394 1.3% 28 0 - - -235 3 257 4.8% 6 37 Santa Monica 16,524 3.8% 5 2 73 0.4% 16611 4 73 0.4% 10 38 Santa Monica Mountains 31 0% 45 0 - - -7 0 0 0% -
39 Sherman Oaks 3,879 0.9% 38 0 - - -126 0 0 0% -
40 Southeast Los Angeles 9,806 2.3% 17 0 - - -789 1 32 0.3% 13 41 Studio/Universal Cities 4,300 1.0% 33 0 - - -292 0 0 0% - 42 Tarzana 1,910 0.4% 43 1 78 4.1% 1581 4 72 3.7% 11
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 24 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 43 Torrance 9,133 2.1% 19 0 - - -469 0 0 0% -
44 West Hollywood 8,067 1.9% 23 1 98 1.2% 14406 1 2 0% 21 45 West Los Angeles 2,975 0.7% 40 2 813 27.3% 2295 0 0 0% - 46 Western SFV 8,953 2.1% 20 0 - - -471 0 0 0% -
47 Western SGV 16,034 3.7% 6 3 108 0.7% 111,103 1 27 0.2% 14 48 Westwood 8,350 1.9% 21 1 47 0.6% 19185 0 0 0% -
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 10,018 2.3% 16 0 - - -212 1 5 0% 19 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 25 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
1 190th Street Corridor 1.4%34 1.4% 9$33.48 4
2 Antelope Valley -1.3%44 0.9% 16$29.84 26
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes -2.4%23 2.3% 2$38.50 42
4 Beverly Hills 0.5%1 -0.5% 35$68.33 13
5 Brentwood 0.6%11 -0.2% 29$52.17 11
6 Burbank 0.9%16 -1.3% 46$42.04 7
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill -0.5%32 0.2% 22$34.02 19
8 Catalina Island -- - -- -
9 Century City 6.2%2 -1.1% 44$65.45 1
10 Culver City -0.3%12 -0.5% 33$51.80 17
11 Downtown Los Angeles -1.9%20 0% 26$39 36
12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake -2.2%21 1.6% 7$38.86 41
13 East LA County Outlying -2.4%47 1.5% 8$28.19 43
14 Eastern SFV -3.0%40 1.2% 10$30.79 47
15 Eastern SGV 2.6%48 -0.6% 37$28.09 3
16 El Segundo -1.2%15 1.0% 13$45.60 24
17 Encino -0.7%31 -1.3% 45$35.07 21
18 Glendale 1.0%27 -0.7% 38$36.23 5
19 Hawthorne/Gardena -2.7%45 2.4% 1$29.28 46
20 Hollywood -1.7%7 0.4% 21$54.98 34
21 Inglewood/South LA -1.3%17 -0.9% 42$41.84 25
22 Koreatown -3.2%35 0.6% 20$33.26 48
23 LAX 0.9%37 0% 27$32.88 8
24 Long Beach: Downtown -1.4%36 1.1% 11$33.08 28
25 Long Beach: Suburban -0.7%38 1.7% 6$32.21 23
26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 0.5%5 -0.1% 28$56.94 12
27 Mid-Cities -1.6%41 1.1% 12$30.28 32
28 Miracle Mile -2.1%9 2.0% 5$52.34 38
29 NE LA County Outlying -2.5%25 1.0% 14$36.45 44
30 North Hollywood -2.1%29 0.9% 15$35.52 37
31 NW LA County Outlying 0.5%18 0% -$40.58 14
32 Olympic Corridor 0.8%10 -0.3% 31$52.30 10
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 0.9%4 -0.6% 36$61.19 6
34 Park Mile -2.1%22 0.8% 18$38.70 40
35 Pasadena 0.9%24 -0.3% 32$37.68 9
36 Santa Clarita Valley -0.5%26 0.1% 24$36.26 18
37 Santa Monica -0.7%3 -0.5% 34$65.03 22
38 Santa Monica Mountains -2.6%13 0.1% 25$51.30 45
39 Sherman Oaks -0.1%28 -0.2% 30$35.60 16
40 Southeast Los Angeles -1.9%42 2.0% 4$29.99 35
41 Studio/Universal Cities -1.3%19 -0.8% 40$39.68 27
42 Tarzana -1.6%30 0.1% 23$35.10 31
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 26 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
43 Torrance -1.5%33 2.2% 3$33.90 29
44 West Hollywood -1.7%6 0.8% 17$56.74 33
45 West Los Angeles -1.5%14 -0.9% 41$47.46 30
46 Western SFV -2.1%43 0.7% 19$29.93 39
47 Western SGV 3.4%46 -0.7% 39$29.18 2
48 Westwood 0%8 -1.1% 43$52.86 15
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr -0.6%39 -1.5% 47$32.04 20
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 27 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
1 190th Street Corridor 741,176 14.3% -84,238 1.6% 622
2 Antelope Valley 242,723 5.4% -62,994 1.4% 94
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 530,046 8.6% -(13,144) -0.2% 1811 4 Beverly Hills 1,992,081 17.6% -(726,375) -6.4% 4738
5 Brentwood 730,832 17.4% -(216,443) -5.1% 3737
6 Burbank 711,803 4.7% 094,437 0.6% 51
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 1,047,394 14.5% -(342,848) -4.7% 4123 8 Catalina Island - - -0 - --
9 Century City 1,509,701 13.2% -(760,927) -6.6% 4821
10 Culver City 1,501,923 15.4% 3.2160,537 1.6% 228
11 Downtown Los Angeles 11,805,050 17.1% -(176,304) -0.3% 3335 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 235,801 5.6% -(23,662) -0.6% 225 13 East LA County Outlying 3,000 24.7% -(3,000) -24.7% 1644 14 Eastern SFV 349,479 5.0% -52,190 0.8% 112
15 Eastern SGV 1,342,920 7.2% -(136,103) -0.7% 318
16 El Segundo 3,184,260 17.3% -(183,749) -1.0% 3536
17 Encino 782,177 15.7% -(132,355) -2.7% 3031
18 Glendale 1,718,620 12.6% -(218,226) -1.6% 3819
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 214,909 7.5% 0.978,082 2.7% 89
20 Hollywood 1,997,311 19.1% -(447,291) -4.3% 4539
21 Inglewood/South LA 465,228 11.0% 1.7260,670 6.1% 115 22 Koreatown 2,595,083 16.4% -(213,292) -1.3% 3634
23 LAX 1,581,080 38.2% -(156,243) -3.8% 3245
24 Long Beach: Downtown 1,222,925 14.8% -(101,059) -1.2% 2825 25 Long Beach: Suburban 1,256,751 12.5% -(416,389) -4.2% 4418 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 2,698,975 24.3% -(858,663) -7.7% 4943 27 Mid-Cities 728,033 6.2% -152,055 1.3% 36
28 Miracle Mile 1,359,719 22.6% -(116,947) -1.9% 2942
29 NE LA County Outlying - - -0 0% --
30 North Hollywood 524,736 14.9% -(52,301) -1.5% 2426
31 NW LA County Outlying - - -0 0% --
32 Olympic Corridor 639,436 14.8% -(25,593) -0.6% 2324
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 127,559 15.7% -(21,857) -2.7% 2132 34 Park Mile 459,011 22.1% -(87,114) -4.2% 2741
35 Pasadena 2,277,361 12.1% -(279,198) -1.5% 4017
36 Santa Clarita Valley 705,371 13.1% 3.183,617 1.6% 720 37 Santa Monica 2,575,284 15.6% -(704,233) -4.3% 4629
38 Santa Monica Mountains - - -0 0% --
39 Sherman Oaks 838,067 21.6% -(349,266) -9.0% 4240
40 Southeast Los Angeles 502,079 5.1% -(74,498) -0.8% 253 41 Studio/Universal Cities 332,622 7.7% -(16,312) -0.4% 1910 42 Tarzana 181,206 9.5% -54,742 2.9% 1012
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 28 Submarkets Los Angeles Office

SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
43 Torrance 883,400 9.7% -(82,207) -0.9% 2613
44 West Hollywood 972,050 12.0% -(263,231) -3.3% 3916
45 West Los Angeles 467,759 15.7% -(21,507) -0.7% 2030
46 Western SFV 921,491 10.3% -(9,982) -0.1% 1714
47 Western SGV 1,048,578 6.5% -116,046 0.7% 47
48 Westwood 1,267,136 15.2% -(402,565) -4.8% 4327
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 1,599,025 16.0% -(183,425) -1.8% 3433 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 29 Supply & Demand Trends Los Angeles Office

OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (131,547) 0% 0.2%883,683 -432,656,433
2024 (926,146) -0.2% 0.2%663,081 -432,787,980
2023 (302,441) -0.1% 0.4%1,856,781 -433,714,126
2022 1,528,361 0.4% -0.1%(512,951) -434,016,567
2021 4,260,537 1.0% -1.3%(5,441,007) -432,488,206
YTD 2,013,050 0.5% -1.1%(4,640,674) -430,240,719
2020 575,606 0.1% -1.7%(7,333,040) -428,227,669
2019 593,876 0.1% -0.5%(2,180,376) -427,652,063
2018 (127,985) 0% 0.3%1,391,155 -427,058,187
2017 1,616,323 0.4% 0%145,805 11.1427,186,172
2016 465,935 0.1% 0.9%3,789,477 0.1425,569,849
2015 693,420 0.2% 0.5%2,302,577 0.3425,103,914
2014 (457,508) -0.1% 0.7%3,079,968 -424,410,494
2013 412,028 0.1% 0.2%865,698 0.5424,868,002
2012 538,011 0.1% 0.3%1,382,536 0.4424,455,974
2011 (482,931) -0.1% -0.1%(510,529) -423,917,963
2010 (379,264) -0.1% -0.9%(3,612,399) -424,400,894
2009 1,992,346 0.5% -1.7%(7,292,792) -424,780,158
4 & 5 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 1,044,960 0.6% 0.8%1,363,689 0.8176,311,413
2024 275,511 0.2% 0.6%987,943 0.3175,266,453
2023 889,057 0.5% 1.0%1,732,655 0.5174,990,942
2022 2,558,951 1.5% 0.9%1,636,967 1.6174,101,885
2021 4,204,608 2.5% -1.2%(2,122,200) -171,542,934
YTD 1,910,286 1.1% -1.8%(3,039,192) -169,248,612
2020 1,415,349 0.9% -1.2%(2,087,751) -167,338,326
2019 1,220,615 0.7% -0.2%(281,152) -165,922,977
2018 1,286,251 0.8% 0.6%917,373 1.4164,702,362
2017 1,874,876 1.2% 0.4%641,148 2.9163,416,111
2016 462,867 0.3% 1.3%2,105,611 0.2161,541,235
2015 862,615 0.5% 0.9%1,474,812 0.6161,078,368
2014 (53,076) 0% 1.2%1,911,695 -160,215,753
2013 765,326 0.5% 0.3%526,522 1.5160,268,829
2012 471,276 0.3% 0.9%1,404,104 0.3159,503,503
2011 199,485 0.1% 0%27,408 7.3159,032,227
2010 769,613 0.5% -1.5%(2,306,537) -158,832,742
2009 2,196,927 1.4% -1.4%(2,178,271) -158,063,129
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 30 Supply & Demand Trends Los Angeles Office
3 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (141) 0% 0.3%441,501 -156,109,654
2024 (140) 0% 0.4%603,395 -156,109,795
2023 18,573 0% 0.4%691,203 0156,109,935
2022 166,162 0.1% -0.4%(584,806) -156,091,362
2021 460,356 0.3% -1.5%(2,353,664) -155,925,200
YTD 220,900 0.1% -1.0%(1,620,230) -155,685,744
2020 (556,085) -0.4% -2.1%(3,217,913) -155,464,844
2019 (483,715) -0.3% -1.0%(1,498,630) -156,020,929
2018 188,868 0.1% 0.6%903,112 0.2156,504,644
2017 63,866 0% 0.7%1,030,266 0.1156,315,776
2016 502,321 0.3% 0.7%1,036,226 0.5156,251,910
2015 193,684 0.1% 0.3%504,766 0.4155,749,589
2014 128,880 0.1% 0.3%516,754 0.2155,555,905
2013 (76,420) 0% -0.1%(176,846) -155,427,025
2012 491,347 0.3% 0.4%557,412 0.9155,503,445
2011 (9,395) 0% 0.2%257,619 -155,012,098
2010 (456,861) -0.3% 0%(38,610) -155,021,493
2009 243,699 0.2% -2.1%(3,272,634) -155,478,354
1 & 2 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (1,176,366) -1.2% -0.9%(921,507) -100,235,366
2024 (1,201,517) -1.2% -0.9%(928,257) -101,411,732
2023 (1,210,071) -1.2% -0.6%(567,077) -102,613,249
2022 (1,196,752) -1.1% -1.5%(1,565,112) -103,823,320
2021 (404,427) -0.4% -0.9%(965,143) -105,020,072
YTD (118,136) -0.1% 0%18,748 -105,306,363
2020 (283,658) -0.3% -1.9%(2,027,376) -105,424,499
2019 (143,024) -0.1% -0.4%(400,594) -105,708,157
2018 (1,603,104) -1.5% -0.4%(429,330) -105,851,181
2017 (322,419) -0.3% -1.4%(1,525,609) -107,454,285
2016 (499,253) -0.5% 0.6%647,640 -107,776,704
2015 (362,879) -0.3% 0.3%322,999 -108,275,957
2014 (533,312) -0.5% 0.6%651,519 -108,638,836
2013 (276,878) -0.3% 0.5%516,022 -109,172,148
2012 (424,612) -0.4% -0.5%(578,980) -109,449,026
2011 (673,021) -0.6% -0.7%(795,556) -109,873,638
2010 (692,016) -0.6% -1.1%(1,267,252) -110,546,659
2009 (448,280) -0.4% -1.7%(1,841,887) -111,238,675
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 31 Rent & Vacancy Los Angeles Office

OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 139 3.1% 10.3%$46.01 59,351,003 13.7% -0.2%
2024 134 4.0% 7.0%$44.64 60,350,432 13.9% -0.3%
2023 129 4.6% 2.9%$42.92 61,933,553 14.3% -0.5%
2022 124 0.3% -1.6%$41.03 64,061,654 14.8% 0.4%
2021 123 -0.3% -1.9%$40.91 61,995,534 14.3% 2.1%
YTD 124 0% -1.2%$41.22 58,871,171 13.7% 1.5%
2020 124 -1.6% -1.6%$41.03 52,217,447 12.2% 1.8%
2019 126 5.1% 0%$41.71 44,419,984 10.4% 0.6%
2018 119 4.0% -4.9%$39.67 41,646,397 9.8% -0.4%
2017 115 4.0% -8.6%$38.14 43,158,406 10.1% 0.3%
2016 110 5.6% -12.1%$36.66 41,694,206 9.8% -0.8%
2015 105 8.0% -16.8%$34.72 44,985,377 10.6% -0.4%
2014 97 6.1% -23.0%$32.13 46,615,513 11.0% -0.8%
2013 91 4.5% -27.4%$30.30 50,135,433 11.8% -0.1%
2012 87 2.5% -30.5%$29 50,589,103 11.9% -0.2%
2011 85 0.3% -32.2%$28.28 51,433,628 12.1% 0%
2010 85 -4.9% -32.4%$28.19 51,411,419 12.1% 0.8%
2009 89 -10.7% -28.9%$29.64 48,171,859 11.3% 2.1%
4 & 5 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 140 2.9% 8.9%$52.73 32,456,095 18.4% -0.3%
2024 136 3.8% 5.9%$51.24 32,776,527 18.7% -0.4%
2023 131 4.4% 1.9%$49.34 33,490,123 19.1% -0.6%
2022 125 0.1% -2.4%$47.24 34,333,721 19.7% 0.2%
2021 125 -1.0% -2.5%$47.18 33,411,740 19.5% 3.3%
YTD 126 -1.2% -1.7%$47.57 32,013,818 18.9% 2.7%
2020 126 -1.5% -1.5%$47.68 27,064,340 16.2% 1.9%
2019 128 6.5% 0%$48.41 23,667,828 14.3% 0.8%
2018 120 4.0% -6.1%$45.44 22,166,061 13.5% 0.1%
2017 116 3.6% -9.7%$43.69 21,784,417 13.3% 0.6%
2016 112 4.9% -12.9%$42.18 20,569,094 12.7% -1.0%
2015 107 9.1% -16.9%$40.21 22,199,818 13.8% -0.5%
2014 98 6.3% -23.9%$36.86 22,812,015 14.2% -1.2%
2013 92 5.1% -28.4%$34.68 24,776,786 15.5% 0.1%
2012 87 0.8% -31.8%$33 24,537,982 15.4% -0.6%
2011 87 1.1% -32.4%$32.73 25,470,810 16.0% 0.1%
2010 86 -3.5% -33.2%$32.36 25,304,122 15.9% 1.9%
2009 89 -11.1% -30.7%$33.54 22,227,972 14.1% 2.6%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 32 Rent & Vacancy Los Angeles Office
3 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 136 3.2% 10.9%$43.69 18,878,262 12.1% -0.3%
2024 132 4.1% 7.5%$42.35 19,319,925 12.4% -0.4%
2023 127 4.7% 3.3%$40.69 19,923,483 12.8% -0.4%
2022 121 0.4% -1.3%$38.88 20,596,134 13.2% 0.5%
2021 121 0.3% -1.6%$38.74 19,845,188 12.7% 1.8%
YTD 122 1.0% -0.9%$39.02 18,845,048 12.1% 1.2%
2020 121 -1.9% -1.9%$38.64 17,003,918 10.9% 1.7%
2019 123 4.5% 0%$39.38 14,342,090 9.2% 0.7%
2018 118 3.8% -4.3%$37.70 13,317,675 8.5% -0.5%
2017 113 4.2% -7.8%$36.32 14,035,849 9.0% -0.6%
2016 109 6.0% -11.5%$34.86 14,989,873 9.6% -0.4%
2015 103 7.3% -16.5%$32.88 15,523,778 10.0% -0.2%
2014 96 5.6% -22.2%$30.65 15,835,488 10.2% -0.2%
2013 91 4.3% -26.3%$29.01 16,204,254 10.4% 0.1%
2012 87 4.0% -29.4%$27.82 16,103,828 10.4% -0.1%
2011 84 0.1% -32.1%$26.75 16,169,893 10.4% -0.2%
2010 83 -6.4% -32.1%$26.73 16,436,907 10.6% -0.2%
2009 89 -10.8% -27.5%$28.57 16,855,158 10.8% 2.2%
1 & 2 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 140 3.3% 12.6%$38.29 8,016,646 8.0% -0.1%
2024 135 4.3% 8.9%$37.06 8,253,980 8.1% -0.2%
2023 130 4.9% 4.5%$35.54 8,519,947 8.3% -0.5%
2022 124 0.6% -0.4%$33.90 9,131,799 8.8% 0.5%
2021 123 0.6% -0.9%$33.70 8,738,606 8.3% 0.6%
YTD 124 1.2% -0.3%$33.92 8,012,305 7.6% -0.1%
2020 122 -1.5% -1.5%$33.50 8,149,189 7.7% 1.7%
2019 124 3.1% 0%$34.02 6,410,066 6.1% 0.2%
2018 120 4.4% -3.0%$32.99 6,162,661 5.8% -1.0%
2017 115 4.7% -7.1%$31.59 7,338,140 6.8% 1.1%
2016 110 6.6% -11.3%$30.17 6,135,239 5.7% -1.0%
2015 103 6.9% -16.8%$28.30 7,261,781 6.7% -0.6%
2014 97 6.3% -22.2%$26.48 7,968,010 7.3% -1.1%
2013 91 3.4% -26.8%$24.91 9,154,393 8.4% -0.7%
2012 88 4.1% -29.2%$24.09 9,947,293 9.1% 0.2%
2011 84 -1.2% -32.0%$23.14 9,792,925 8.9% 0.2%
2010 85 -5.3% -31.1%$23.42 9,670,390 8.7% 0.6%
2009 90 -9.8% -27.3%$24.72 9,088,729 8.2% 1.3%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 33 Sale Trends Los Angeles Office

OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 198- $484.95 5.6%
2024 -- - -- 192- $470.77 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 184- $451.58 5.5%
2022 -- - -- 175- $428.72 5.6%
2021 -- - -- 177- $434.62 5.5%
YTD $3.3B553 2.0% $405.91$6,887,235 1785.3% $436.39 5.6% 2020 $4.1B505 2.6% $396.60$9,767,246 1765.5% $430.23 5.6% 2019 $7.8B758 3.8% $515.06$13,940,256 1755.5% $428.31 5.6% 2018 $7.1B1,040 5.5% $358.11$10,465,688 1665.2% $407.13 5.6% 2017 $10.4B1,246 8.0% $355.15$14,686,008 1615.5% $393.83 5.5% 2016 $11B1,029 7.3% $386.37$15,063,365 1565.3% $382.34 5.5% 2015 $6.5B1,102 5.7% $299.51$8,896,417 1465.7% $357.04 5.6% 2014 $8.7B983 6.8% $312.07$11,916,032 1336.5% $325.85 5.7% 2013 $9.4B875 8.4% $280.69$14,848,416 1226.3% $298.20 6.0% 2012 $4B847 4.9% $237.21$8,578,308 1136.9% $276.86 6.2% 2011 $2.9B641 3.3% $242.89$7,404,827 1087.7% $265.48 6.4% 2010 $1.5B398 1.9% $216.91$5,225,998 977.1% $237.98 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 4 & 5 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 194- $543.30 5.4%
2024 -- - -- 189- $528.27 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 181- $507.59 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 173- $482.56 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 175- $490.07 5.4%
YTD $660.9M17 0.8% $462.99$41,184,309 1765.6% $492.82 5.4% 2020 $2.1B49 3.2% $431.53$65,115,224 1765.1% $491.38 5.4% 2019 $3B37 3.4% $522.86$90,206,884 1745.5% $486.48 5.4% 2018 $3.1B62 5.8% $378.54$53,085,305 1665.1% $463.57 5.4% 2017 $6.3B85 10.1% $392.38$79,630,910 1615.0% $451.63 5.3% 2016 $7.3B96 10.4% $456.49$84,117,152 1574.7% $440.37 5.3% 2015 $2.6B72 5.0% $344.91$44,369,728 1475.3% $410.46 5.3% 2014 $5.4B63 9.6% $354.54$89,019,933 1346.7% $375.24 5.5% 2013 $6.7B73 13.7% $316.13$100,968,046 1245.8% $347.02 5.7% 2012 $2.4B67 6.4% $276.22$65,358,019 1156.4% $323 5.9%
2011 $1.4B28 3.1% $283.09$51,801,776 1117.8% $309.83 6.1% 2010 $647.4M16 1.9% $248.28$53,780,838 996.4% $277.02 6.6% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 34 Sale Trends Los Angeles Office
3 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 199- $447.15 5.7%
2024 -- - -- 193- $433.73 5.6%
2023 -- - -- 185- $415.74 5.6%
2022 -- - -- 176- $394.55 5.7%
2021 -- - -- 178- $399.67 5.6%
YTD $1.5B186 2.5% $435.09$10,955,259 1795.7% $402.36 5.7% 2020 $1.3B162 2.4% $349.70$10,360,039 1755.9% $393.36 5.7% 2019 $3.5B241 4.5% $552.30$20,523,507 1755.6% $392.37 5.7% 2018 $2.9B292 5.8% $354.33$13,736,641 1665.2% $372.48 5.7% 2017 $2.8B337 6.7% $309.95$12,957,239 1605.8% $359.01 5.7% 2016 $2.2B247 4.9% $313.83$12,391,084 1565.5% $349.48 5.6% 2015 $2.7B279 6.7% $273.65$12,730,734 1466.0% $328.12 5.7% 2014 $2B273 5.2% $267.27$10,194,403 1346.0% $299.82 5.8% 2013 $1.9B249 5.7% $223.31$10,493,478 1216.6% $272.51 6.1% 2012 $981.6M254 4.1% $189.84$7,669,606 1128.2% $252.56 6.3% 2011 $1.1B191 3.7% $233.40$9,027,888 1088.1% $242.33 6.5% 2010 $551.5M146 2.0% $195.16$6,483,352 978.1% $217.25 7.0% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 1 & 2 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 204- $444.04 5.7%
2024 -- - -- 198- $430.13 5.7%
2023 -- - -- 190- $411.65 5.6%
2022 -- - -- 180- $389.93 5.7%
2021 -- - -- 182- $394.29 5.7%
YTD $1.1B350 3.1% $348.84$3,454,200 1815.1% $393.06 5.7% 2020 $776.3M294 1.9% $396.40$2,920,800 1775.2% $383.32 5.7% 2019 $1.3B480 3.3% $426.92$3,763,895 1775.5% $384.96 5.7% 2018 $1.1B686 4.8% $319.51$2,757,486 1685.4% $364.70 5.7% 2017 $1.3B824 6.8% $309.77$3,150,539 1615.3% $349.41 5.7% 2016 $1.5B686 6.1% $276.78$3,297,824 1545.4% $334.63 5.7% 2015 $1.3B751 5.2% $280.70$2,735,158 1435.5% $311.17 5.8% 2014 $1.2B647 5.2% $248.29$2,596,067 1306.7% $282.39 5.9% 2013 $888.2M553 4.6% $216.36$2,260,740 1186.4% $255.17 6.2% 2012 $548.2M526 3.8% $200.83$1,841,827 1096.1% $236.23 6.5% 2011 $405.1M422 3.0% $175.73$1,660,038 1047.2% $226.11 6.7% 2010 $255.5M236 1.5% $200.93$1,409,229 946.6% $203.83 7.2% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 35 Los Angeles - CA

PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Retail Market Report

RETAIL MARKET REPORT
Market Key Statistics 1
Leasing 3
Rent 8
Construction 10
Under Construction Properties 12
Sales 14
Sales Past 12 Months 16
Economy 18
Market Submarkets 23
Supply & Demand Trends 30
Rent & Vacancy 34
Sale Trends 38
Los Angeles Retail
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview Los Angeles Retail
797K 210K 5.2% 0%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth The Los Angeles retail sector was particularly exposed to the pandemic, but certain segments strengthened and
retailers were able to make investments that added
technology to operations that could lower labor costs and streamline services. Goods retailers like home goods and furniture had sales increase. Grocery stores and fitness centers drive traffic to properties and have been pursued as anchors to neighborhood centers and new mixed-use
developments.

The retail sector will need to evolve and rightsize by
repurposing or demolishing defunct retail properties.

Some longtime vacant big-box sites with excellent
freeway access were acquired with plans to reposition
them as industrial sites. For example, a vacant 140,000- SF former Costco site in Montebello was sold to a
developer that reached an agreement with the city to
convert a portion of the site to a last-mile delivery
facility. That follows the conversion of a former Costco site to an Amazon last-mile facility in Torrance last year.

Industrial developer CenterPoint Properties recently
acquired a longtime vacant former Walmart store in
Norwalk that also meets the typical criteria of a last mile facility.

Vacancy has increased for several years, and all
plausible economic scenarios in CoStar's property
market forecast anticipate market vacancy to rise for at least the near term. Average asking rates are projected to correspondingly decline through the end of the year.

The current construction pipeline is modest and will have little impact on market fundamentals on a metro-wide
basis. Construction is bifurcated among high-end retail in major mixed-use developments and small retail pads
usually with drive-thru capabilities. Large projects
nearing completion include The Grand on Bunker Hill in
Downtown Los Angeles and Hollywood Park in
Inglewood. Construction will commence early next year
on the waterfront development project in San Pedro that will add 100,000 SF at the Ports O'Call village.

Los Angeles has some of the most prized and expensive
retail real estate in the nation, much of which is on the Westside. Beverly Hills and its famed Rodeo Drive are
world renowned, but other high-street retail districts in Abbot Kinney, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood have
rental rates that surpass the highest rates in most other markets.

One underlying advantage L.A. retail has compared to
most markets in the nation is its relatively lower retail stock per capita. As an example, Los Angeles has about
20% less retail square footage than the Chicago metro
despite having a higher population. Development is much harder to launch in L.A. than in more pro-growth metros with greater land availability and potential retail sites compete with industrial and multifamily uses. While there is obsolete retail that needs to be filtered out of the local market, these properties are coveted for a variety of
conversion options.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Overview Los Angeles Retail

KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$43.518.2%42,911,469Malls 6.6% (1,064) 0 49,814
$32.363.9%23,871,759Power Center 4.3% 1,200 0 4,200
$31.107.0%102,303,432Neighborhood Center 8.6% 3,627 0 355,287 $29.145.3%36,081,325Strip Center 6.1% (9,353) 0 31,700
$32.853.9%239,193,848General Retail 5.1% (11,370) 0 1,178,306 $38.887.8%2,745,698Other 9.3% 0 0 0
$33.185.2%447,107,531Market 6.1% (16,960) 0 1,619,307
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When

4.7%4.7%0%Vacancy Change (YOY) 5.7% 2010 Q1 3.0% 2007 Q3 1,468,509935,614210KNet Absorption SF 6,891,784 2007 Q3 (4,167,346) 2009 Q3 1,646,1482,307,799797KDeliveries SF 6,518,848 2008 Q4 819,232 2021 Q3

2.7%1.2%0%Rent Growth 5.4% 2007 Q2 -5.3% 2009 Q4
N/A$3.5B$4.8BSales Volume $5.7B 2015 Q2 $979.6M 2009 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing Los Angeles Retail
Gross leasing activity since the onset of the pandemic
has seen a sustained pickup since cratering in 20Q2.

Generally, the categories with high leasing activity have been grocery, restaurants, and fitness. At the metro
level, the 5.2% rate has receded slightly from its highest level in seven years. Net absorption is on track for its first positive quarter in 21Q3 in two years and will total its highest amount in four years. East Hollywood/Silverlake has the highest 12-month rolling net absorption totals
among submarkets followed by the Santa Clarita Valley
and Inglewood/South LA. Conversely, Eastern SGV,
Santa Monica, Downtown Los Angeles, and Koreatown
each have more than 100,000 SF of negative absorption
during that period.

Fitness centers have been successful at utilizing outdoor space, especially in Southern California, where the
weather permits outdoor training and exercise for the
vast majority of the year. Notable leases include Gold's Gym, which leased 45,000 SF at the north end of Third
Street Promenade in Santa Monica. Chuze Fitness
signed a 15-year, 40,000-SF lease in La Verne to
anchor a center that was previously occupied by Orchard Supply Hardware. Chuze Fitness has added many
locations in other parts of Southern California, but this is only its second location in L.A. County. In Whittier, EOS Fitness leased 37,340 SF at The Groves, a master-
planned community being by Brookfield in partnership
with Lennar Homes. Plans include 150,000 SF of new
retail space with Stater Bros. grocer occupying 45,000
SF.

Restaurants were active signing leases for high-profile locations that were vacated over the past two years and in new construction. Hollywood Japanese hotspot
Yamashiro signed a lease at the Ports O'Call waterfront redevelopment in San Pedro. At 5100 Wilshire Blvd. in
Miracle Mile, the 6,350-SF ground floor restaurant space was leased with an opening planned for next year. Maple & Ash leased 13,672 SF at the MGM building at 835 N
Beverly Drive for the first California location of the
concept crafted by two-Michelin-star chef Danny Grant
that serves seafood and steaks. Other major
announcements were famed New York chef Daniel
Boulud agreeing to occupy 6,500 SF at a ground-floor
restaurant space for the office building under
construction at 9200 Wilshire Blvd. in Beverly Hills.

Grocers have been active, having thrived during the
pandemic as an essential business. Amazon opened its
first Amazon Fresh location in the nation in Woodland
Hills. Since then, more than a dozen of the grocery
stores have opened in Southern California including Long Beach, Ladera Heights, North Hollywood, Northridge,
and Whittier. Amazon recently announced that a Whole
Foods location in Sherman Oaks would be the first in the country to utilize its cashierless technology next year.

Grocers are also coveted as key anchors to new
developments. Local chain Gelson's preleased 36,000
SF at West Edge, a large-mixed use project under
construction in West L.A. Erewhon, a high-end grocer
with six locations in L.A. County, signed a 15,000-SF
lease at the Culver Steps development in Culver City in the ground floor of an office building leased by Amazon Studios. Other ground floor retail tenants include Pop's Bagels, Philz Coffee, Salt & Straw and Corepower Yoga.

Erewhon will also open locations in Beverly Hills and
Studio City later this year.

Other bright spots include non-traditional retail uses
such as education, religious, and medical tenants. These tenants add stability to a property and provide cash flow to investors who are struggling with the pressures that the brick-and-mortar retail industry has faced from
online competitors. In Santa Clarita, a church signed a three-year deal for 23,600 SF at 23744-23780 Newhall
Ave. as an anchor tenant inside of the strip mall. The
property was offered at $1/SF/month triple net with free rent concessions. In the Mid-Cities Submarket, OFL
Charter Schools signed a 13,000-SF lease in July at
2001 N Long Beach Blvd. in Compton for a newly
renovated space.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing Los Angeles Retail

NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY

VACANCY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Leasing Los Angeles Retail

AVAILABILITY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Leasing Los Angeles Retail
12 MONTH NET ABSORPTION SF IN SELECTED BUILDINGS
3rd Qtr
Building Name/Address Submarket Bldg SF Vacant SF
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 4th Qtr 12 Month
Net Absorption SF
East Hollywood/Silve… 194,749 34,820 (4,320) (9) 0 0 145,6455520 W Sunset Blvd Western SFV 136,325 0 136,325 0 0 0 136,32521300 Roscoe Blvd Woodland Hills/Warn… 153,597 0 115,234 0 0 0 115,234Fallbrook Center Pasadena 105,000 0 105,000 0 0 0 105,0002940 E Foothill Blvd Downtown Los Angeles 61,077 0 0 0 61,077 0 61,077560 S Los Angeles St Hollywood 54,632 0 0 0 54,632 0 54,6326400 W Sunset Blvd West Los Angeles 216,756 2,611 (1,091) 0 1,480 0 54,253Plaza La Cienega El Segundo 53,300 0 0 53,300 0 0 53,300Manhattan Village Santa Clarita Valley 53,779 0 0 51,619 0 0 51,619Castaic Village Shopping Center Torrance 165,000 0 48,544 0 0 0 48,544Mervyn's Plaza
Downtown Los Angeles 400,000 0 0 0 48,479 0 48,479The Bloc Long Beach: Suburban 42,000 0 0 42,000 0 0 42,0006325 E Spring St Westwood 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 41,0861360-1380 Westwood Blvd Eastern SGV 74,368 720 0 39,592 0 0 38,934La Verne Courtyard Mid-Cities 41,720 0 0 0 35,000 0 35,00011541 Rosecrans Ave Southeast Los Angeles 30,044 0 30,044 0 0 0 30,044Friendly Hills Marketplace Mid-Cities 29,320 0 0 0 29,320 0 29,320South St Mall
1,856,667 38,151 429,736 186,502 229,988 0 1,090,492Subtotal Primary Competitors 445,918,939 23,192,056 (482,972) (583,182) 966,623 (19,768) (880,727)Remaining Los Angeles Market 447,775,606 23,230,207 (53,236) (396,680) 1,196,611 (19,768) 209,765Total Los Angeles Market 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Leasing Los Angeles Retail
TOP RETAIL LEASES PAST 12 MONTHS
Building Name/Address Submarket Leased SF Tenant Name Tenant Rep Company Leasing Rep CompanyQtr Fallbrook Center Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 115,234 Furniture City - Colliers InternationalQ1 21 Sherman Oaks Galleria Sherman Oaks 87,046 Regal Cinemas - JLLQ2 21 Food 4 Less * Inglewood/South LA 79,101 Food 4 Less - NewmarkQ4 20 Crossroads Plaza Southeast Los Angeles 60,000 - - Colliers InternationalQ1 21 6400 W Sunset Blvd Hollywood 54,632 Impact Museums Savills Cushman & WakefieldQ2 21 LA Kings Valley Ice Center * Eastern SFV 52,254 LA Kings Valley Ice Center Agora Realty & Man… Agora Realty & Manag…Q4 20 Norwalk Fitness Village * Southeast Los Angeles 50,000 LA Fitness - -Q4 20 The Groves-Whittier Southeast Los Angeles 45,110 Stater Bros. Markets Remer Radcliff Corp… Retail InsiteQ2 21 Third Street Promenade Santa Monica 44,697 Gold's Gym JLL JLLQ2 21 Hawaiian Gardens Towne Center Long Beach: Suburban 43,130 Eos Fitness - JLLQ1 21 La Verne Courtyard Eastern SGV 39,592 Chuze Fitness - Treelane RealtyQ2 21 The Groves-Whittier Southeast Los Angeles 37,340 EOS Fitness Retail Insite Retail InsiteQ2 21 West Edge West Los Angeles 36,000 Gelson's - Beta;CBREQ2 21 11541 Rosecrans Ave Mid-Cities 35,000 AltaMed - CBREQ1 21 Westrux International Southeast Los Angeles 32,489 Westrux International - -Q3 21 Cerritos Plaza South * Mid-Cities 28,000 CVS - Coreland CompaniesQ4 20 5240 Lankershim Blvd * North Hollywood 28,000 Laemmle Noho 7 - -Q2 21 44805-44819 10th St W Antelope Valley 26,402 Boulevard Hydro Inc. RE/MAX Crissman… Coldwell Banker Comm…Q1 21 Northridge University Plaza Western SFV 25,950 - - David MoradzadehQ1 21 Bouquet Canyon Plaza Santa Clarita Valley 23,885 Seafood City CBRE Cypress Retail GroupQ2 21 Stagecoach Plaza Santa Clarita Valley 23,600 The Center Church - Lee & Associates;Lee…Q3 21 Carson Shopping Center * Torrance 23,000 CVS Pharmacy - CBREQ3 21 18247 Sherman Way Western SFV 22,333 WSS NAI Capital Springstead & AssociatesQ4 20 Avalon Plaza Torrance 22,275 - - JLLQ4 20
5439 N Rosemead Blvd Western SGV 22,000 TS Emporium CBRE CBREQ4 20 888 S Vermont Ave Koreatown 21,786 - - CBREQ4 20
21243 Avalon Blvd Torrance 21,781 - - Lee & AssociatesQ2 21 99 Cents Only Store Western SFV 20,250 - - Mushmel Properties Co…Q3 21 Fallas Paredes Mid-Cities 20,000 - - BetaQ2 21
Office Depot Miracle Mile 19,450 - - Kennedy Wilson Proper…Q1 21 Santa Fe Springs Marketplace * Southeast Los Angeles 18,014 O'Reilly Auto Parts - America West Properti…Q4 20 Skyline Ranch Plaza Santa Clarita Valley 18,000 Grocery Outlet - NAI CapitalQ4 20 Former Toys R US - Redevelopment… Antelope Valley 18,000 - - Cushman & Wakefield |…Q3 21 22850 Hawthorne Blvd Torrance 18,000 Universal Appliance NAI Capital NAI CapitalQ2 21 Santa Fe Springs Marketplace Southeast Los Angeles 17,880 Pic N Save Lee & Associates Lee & Associates Com…Q2 21 Indian Hill Plaza Eastern SGV 17,800 - - Reliable PropertiesQ3 21 Coliseum Center * Culver City 17,755 Goodwill - -Q2 21
Lancaster Commerce Center Antelope Valley 17,404 Hope of the Valley Thrift S… - -Q4 20 The Shoppes @ Highlander Center Western SGV 17,400 Grocery Outlet Newmark;Springste… Globe Properties;Lee &…Q4 20 Destination O-Eight Antelope Valley 17,000 AutoZone Canaan Pacific CBREQ4 20 *Renewal
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Rent Los Angeles Retail
Retail rents in Los Angeles have declined since the
onset of the pandemic and hover around $33.00/SF.

That's about 50% higher than the national average of
$22.00/SF. Other metro areas have recovered much
faster than Los Angeles. However, from early 2012 to the first half of 2020, average asking rates increased by 27% in L.A., outpacing the national average, which saw gains of 21% during this period.

Current average asking rates are down 0.0% year over
year. In terms of retail subtypes, all had declines in
21Q2, but strip and neighborhood center rates declined
at a slower pace relative to the power centers, malls, and general retail segments. Only a very small number of
submarkets have positive annual rent growth, mainly in
the northern part of the county. The San Fernando,
Santa Clarita and Antelope Valleys are among the
strongest performing submarkets for rent increases,
although gains are minimal.

Notably, there is a wide spread in asking rates in Greater Los Angeles. Average rents are four times higher in
Beverly Hills than in parts of the San Gabriel Valley.

Looking ahead, metro rental rates are projected to
decline for at least the near term based on the CoStar
baseline economic rent forecast.

MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Rent Los Angeles Retail

MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Construction Los Angeles Retail
The past 12 months have had 340,000 SF of new retail
space deliver in L.A. County. The most notable
completion in 21Q2 was the 53,000-SF retail expansion
of the Manhattan Village shopping center in Manhattan
Beach. The Village Shops space is all outdoors and
replaced indoor portions that were on the site. Tenants in the expansion portion include Boa Steakhouse, Roku
Sushi, Canadian restaurant Joey and a slew of casual
restaurants, fitness studios, and clothing retailers. In Long Beach, ground-up construction of a new 42,000-
SF grocery store completed at the Lakewood Plaza
Marketplace in East Long Beach with Amazon Fresh as
the tenant. The former Haggen Food & Pharmacy space
was reduced in size by 10,000 SF, and outdoor seating
was added. Ivy Station in Culver City is expecting grand openings for its tenants by year end including Equator
Coffees, LA Ale Works, Mamoun's falafel, StretchLab,
YogaSix and Healthy Spot.

Looking at the current construction pipeline, there is 1.7 million SF of retail space under construction in the metro.

This is modest from a historical perspective. Two very
high-profile projects are expected to deliver by the end of the year. Related California's The Grand project on
Bunker Hill in Downtown Los Angeles will add 175,000
SF of retail space to the massive mixed-use apartment,
condo, and hotel project. Also in Downtown Los Angeles, the mixed-use Oceanwide Plaza in South Park was
slated to complete in 2019 with just over 150,000 SF of retail space, but the Chinese-owned project adjacent to Staples Center halted construction due to funding issues.

Work is nearing completion on the first phase of the retail portion of the Hollywood Park development in Inglewood
adjacent to SoFi Stadium. Phase one will deliver 160,000 SF of new space. Tenants in the project include a mix of local and national tenants such as a gastropub run by
the founder of the Three Weavers Brewing Company,
Olympix Fitness, and Cinepolis Luxury Cinemas, a luxury theater chain based in Mexico.

Santa Monica has more than 100,000 SF of new
construction underway, most in ground-floor retail in
multifamily developments. The largest project is the retail portion of a large mixed-use development at 500
Broadway called The Park. The 54,000-SF ground-floor
retail development at the site of the former Fred Segal store will anchor a seven-story, 262-unit project that will finish in 2022. Santa Monica is an excellent example of the changing dynamics for retail properties. While the
new construction mixed-use development will add retail, the nearby Santa Monica Place mall is seeking to
convert space vacated by Bloomingdale's into office.

In Beverly Hills, two major planned hotel projects include significant ground-floor retail amenities. On Rodeo Drive, French luxury goods company LVMH is planning
construction on a 115-room Cheval Blanc hotel that will include 24,300 SF of ground-floor and second-floor
retail space. Meanwhile, at the longtime vacant
Robinson's May site on Wilshire Blvd., the city council approved a $2 billion mixed-use development that
includes approximately 35,000 SF of retail and restaurant space.

In San Pedro, work is finally set to commence on the
West Harbor project that will redevelop the Ports O'Call village into a waterfront development with restaurants
and retail. Approximately 65,000 SF was preleased to
seven tenants including Hollywood's famed Japanese
restaurant Yamashiro. The project is slated to open in
2023.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Construction Los Angeles Retail

DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS

SUBMARKET CONSTRUCTION
Average Building Size
RankUnder Constr
Under Construction Inventory
All ExistingSF (000) Pre-Leased SF (000)SubmarketNo. RankBldgs Pre-Leased % 1 Downtown Los Angeles 2 329 164,59653.5% 8 17,407176 2 2 Inglewood/South LA 1 320 320,000100% 1 6,929320 1
3 Southeast Los Angeles 13 154 11,84794.5% 4 8,099146 10 4 Culver City 2 119 59,50061.3% 7 8,71473 5
5 Century City 1 94 94,0003.7% 10 177,4434 3
6 Studio/Universal Cities 1 94 94,00095.3% 3 7,29790 3
7 Western SGV 7 92 13,18782.7% 5 8,97476 9
8 Santa Monica 3 78 26,12931.1% 9 8,67424 6
9 West Hollywood 3 78 26,05074.7% 6 8,03158 7
10 Eastern SGV 3 74 24,748100% 1 11,99274 8
All Other 26 219 8,40729.0% 9,37263
Totals 62 1,652 26,64366.9% 9,4661,104
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Under Construction Properties Los Angeles Retail
64 1,658,572 0.4% 67.0%
Properties Square Feet Percent of Inventory Preleased

UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROPERTIES

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Apr 20203883 W Century Blvd 320,000 1 Apr 2022 Wilson Meany The Kroenke Group
1 Feb 2019100 S Grand Ave
The Grand 176,000 20 Mar 2022 Related California Irvine Related California Irvine
2 Mar 20171110 S Figueroa St
The Collection at Ocean… 153,192 3 Nov 2021 China Oceanwide Holdings Co. Ltd.

China Oceanwide Holdings Co. Ltd.
3 Oct 20183321 S La Cienega Blvd
Cumulus District 100,000 1 Nov 2021 Carmel Partners
Carmel Partners
4 Aug 201912825 Ventura Blvd
The Shops at The Sports… 94,000 2 Nov 2021 Weintraub Real Estate Group Midwood Investment & Developm…
5 Dec 20172025 Avenue of the Stars
Century Plaza Retail 94,000 46 Nov 2022 -
Woodridge Capital Partners LLC
6 Jan 2019Sorenson Ave
The Groves 82,450 1 Nov 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
7 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Under Construction Properties Los Angeles Retail

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Oct 2018960-962 N La Brea Ave 58,417 5 Dec 2021 BMB Investment Corporation BMB Investment Corporation
8 Nov 2019500 Broadway
The Park Retail Portion 54,000 1 Nov 2021 Witkoff
KRE Capital, LLC
9 Jan 2017101-111 W Valley Blvd
The Shops and Residenc… 48,126 5 Jan 2022 AYS Hospitality Inc.

AYS Hospitality Inc.
10 Aug 20206150 Laurel Canyon Blvd
NOHO West Retail G 44,314 2 Nov 2021 Merlone Geier Management, Inc.

Goldstein Planting Investments
11 Jul 20212539 E Garvey Ave N 42,455 1 Jan 2022 -
-
12 Apr 2021667 Auto Center Dr
Mazda 30,590 - Nov 2021 Sam Ershadi
Sam Ershadi
13 Feb 20182413 Pacific Coast Hwy
Atrium Design Center 26,991 3 Nov 2021 -
South Bay Design Center Inc
14 Jan 20181802 4th St
Santa Monica College E… 20,000 1 Nov 2021 -
City of Santa Monica
15 Jan 20195211 W Adams Blvd 19,000 3 Nov 2021 -
CIM Group, LP
16 Jun 2021NWC Bellflower Blvd and C
Belle Fleur Centre 17,000 1 Jun 2022 -
-
17 Jan 2019Whittier Blvd 15,800 1 Dec 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
18 Dec 20193001 N Hollywood Way
R-2 15,000 1 Nov 2021 Overton Moore Properties
Overton Moore Properties
19 Dec 20193001-3007 N Hollywood W…
R-1 15,000 1 Nov 2021 Overton Moore Properties
Overton Moore Properties
20 Feb 201813767-13811 Roscoe Blvd
Roscoewood Center - Ne… 12,593 2 Dec 2021 -
Elias Shokrian
21 Dec 20168533 W Sunset Blvd
8533 Sunset 11,840 3 Dec 2021 Simha Engineering & Assoc The Farid and Faranhaz Amid Fa…
22 Aug 2018550 W Garvey Ave 11,081 2 Nov 2021 -
HSL Realty, Inc.
23 Dec 20202127 Huntington 10,000 1 Nov 2021 -
-
24 Jul 202110949 Garvey Ave 10,000 1 Feb 2022 -
-
25 Jan 2019Whittier Blvd
Bldg 4 8,910 1 Dec 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
26 Nov 2017613 Rose Ave 8,515 2 Nov 2021 -
Tatiana Botton
27 Jan 2019Sorenson Ave
Bldg 1 8,450 1 Dec 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
28 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Sales Los Angeles Retail
Retail property sales volume totaled $4.8 billion for the past 12 months, which is the highest retail sales volume in the country during that time period, demonstrating the sheer size of the market. Properties in Los Angeles are still expensive compared with many Sun Belt markets,
where occupancy and rent growth are higher.

Annual totals for 2020 were boosted by Simon
Properties' 80% purchase of mall REIT Taubman's
portfolio, which included the Beverly Center, valued at $560 million, as part of the $3.4 billion investment. Simon Properties acquired an 80% stake in the 100-property
portfolio in 20Q4.

Recent mall sales include properties with potential to
redevelop portions of the property with residential units.

The largest sale of the quarter was Harridge
Development Group's $140 million acquisition of Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza mall in August. The mall was more
than 50% vacant at the time of sale primarily because of vacancies by Walmart and Sears, among others. The
mall has had several proposals for conversions and
additions; Harridge envisions adding nearly 1,000
residential units at the 42-acre property over the next several years.

Another large shopping center that sold after more than a year on the market was Eagle Rock Plaza, which sold
in June after ownership paused the sale due to the
pandemic. New owners Atlas Capital Group and Eastern
Real Estate acquired the 465,000-SF property for $76
million, or $163/SF, and could reposition the aging
property in line with current trends for open-air lifestyle centers with restaurants, especially if anchor tenants
close. The Macy's lease is set to expire in 2023.

Residential prices in the area have appreciated
considerably, and the site has significant parking that could be repurposed for a residential component.

Triple net deals to top-tier tenants generated high sales across a variety of categories. In Westchester, a triple net leased Amazon Fresh supermarket commanded $35
million for the, 29,456-SF store. The building was fully leased with 15 years left on the term. The in-place cap rate was reported at 4.2%. Small pad drive-thru
restaurants generally traded with 4%-4.5% cap rates,
depending on the neighborhood. In Manhattan Beach, a
Carl's Jr. single-tenant drive thru sold for $5.6 million in September at a 3.85% cap rate. The seller, CalBay
Development, had acquired it 19 months earlier for $3.5 million at a 4.25% cap rate, representing a 63%
increase.

In Glendale, Decron Properties sold a freestanding retail building totaling 111,624 SF on 7.9 acres at 5040 San
Fernando Road for $61.8 million, or $553/SF at a 4.5%
cap rate. The property was fully leased to Home Depot
on a triple net basis with eight years remaining on its lease.

The average modeled price per SF currently stands at
$390, well above the national retail average of $220/SF.

Average market cap rates, presently 5.4%, are far below the national average of 7.0%
Declines in recent quarters have been modest.

Downward pressure on pricing is forecast to persist for at least the near term in the metro, but it's worth noting that the sector is the most stratified among property types
when it comes to asset performance and investor
demand.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Sales Los Angeles Retail

SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF

MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Sales Past 12 Months Los Angeles Retail
1,466 5.2% $368 6.3%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale

SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS

SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $50,000 $3,414,717 $1,550,000 $558,981,214
Price/SF $1.05 $368 $391 $18,900
Cap Rate 1.6% 5.2% 5.0% 10.0%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.0 5.5 5.1 12.0
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 170 9,586 3,658 834,000
Stories 1 1 1 4
Typical Floor SF 170 7,205 3,300 292,505
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 6.3% 0% 100%
Year Built 1799 1958 1956 2021
Star Rating

2.3 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Sales Past 12 Months Los Angeles Retail
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate

RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 Beverly Center 1982 834,000 0% $558,981,214 $838
8500 Beverly Blvd
12/29/2020 -
-
2 457-459 N Rodeo Dr 1946 11,625 0% $122,000,000 $10,49511/13/2020 - -
3 Eagle Rock Plaza 1974 445,370 7.5% $72,695,924 $163
2700 Colorado Blvd
6/17/2021 -
-
4 5040 San Fernando Rd 1992 111,624 0% $61,750,000 $5538/27/2021 4.5% -
5 5905 Van Nuys Blvd 2007 150,887 0% $58,465,948 $38711/4/2020 - -
6 Gaju Market Place 2016 91,883 0% $57,500,000 $626
450 S Western Ave
12/7/2020 5.0%
-
7 Keyes European Mercedes 2011 163,493 0% $54,300,000 $332 5400 Van Nuys Blvd
11/4/2020 -
-
8 Longo Lexus 1985 292,505 0% $51,350,000 $176
3530 Peck Rd
3/31/2021 -
-
9 Crenshaw Plaza 1947 343,879 0% $45,006,413 $131
3650 W Martin Luther King…
8/24/2021 -
-
10 South Bay Village 1971 104,906 0% $37,141,654 $354
19330-19350 Hawthorne…
1/7/2021 -
-
11 6855 S La Cienega Blvd 2020 29,456 0% $35,000,000 $1,1887/15/2021 4.2% -
12 Macy's 1948 263,626 0% $34,000,000 $129
4005 Crenshaw Blvd
8/24/2021 -
-
13 Sears 1951 157,150 50.0% $33,900,000 $216
12121 Victory Blvd
6/1/2021 -
-
14 Walmart Supercenter 1998 111,830 100% $32,300,000 $289 11729 Imperial
5/4/2021 -
-
15 800-812 N Broadway 1958 79,500 0% $29,500,000 $3717/19/2021 - -
16 Westrux International 1989 32,489 0% $27,425,000 $844 15555 Valley View Ave
7/20/2021 -
-
17 Walmart 1947 205,568 0% $26,904,459 $131
4101 Crenshaw Blvd
8/24/2021 -
-
18 1007-1029 W Martin Luth… 1965 41,802 8.2% $23,730,873 $56811/25/2020 - -
19 Westlake Village Market… 1998 50,242 0% $22,525,000 $448 5770 Lindero Canyon Rd
3/5/2021 5.1%
-
20 Norwalk Toyota 1987 59,902 0% $21,000,000 $351
11404-11450 Imperial Hwy
11/10/2020 -
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Economy Los Angeles Retail
The Los Angeles economy is recovering slowly from the
pandemic, a trend that followed the Great Recession
when the local economy was slower to recover than
other areas. The metro unemployment rate, after seeing
a sustained improvement for months in the second half
of last year, has plateaued above 10%. New coronavirus
cases, as well as deaths, have temporarily spiked due to variants, but schools reopened and restrictions have
eased.

Los Angeles' position as the entertainment capital of the world and the increased demand for video streaming and
social media had been a boon to the L.A. economy
during the past several years. The pandemic accelerated demand for streaming services, although studios have
targeted theater only releases for 2022, assuming
widespread adoption of vaccinations. The entertainment
business directly or indirectly employs one out of five workers in L.A. County. Content creators have banked
studio space and made investments focused on the
future of the industry. Warner Bros. is currently under construction on its 800,000 SF Second Century
expansion in Burbank. Studio space is at a premium in
the Hollywood, Burbank, and Glendale neighborhoods,
and warehouses in neighboring areas are taking
advantage of that demand with creative industrial
conversions.

Tourism is important for the local economy and the
impact to this sector and its employees has been
considerable. Before the pandemic, over 500,000 people
in the county were employed in the leisure and
hospitality industry. The city had more than 50 million visitors in 2019, but the pandemic severely impacted
travel. Stores, restaurants, and lodging in tourist hotspots like Downtown L.A., Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and Santa Monica have been particularly impacted. However, the
market is set for a major rebound as large events such
as the 2022 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympics spur the
hospitality and retail sectors.

The industrial sector has sustained growth through the
pandemic as warehousing demands increased by
ecommerce retail operations. A backup at the ports has
led to a record number of ships waiting to unload cargo.

Continued bottlenecks, however, could soon become a
headwind for LA's industrial market if conditions at the ports don't improve. The need for warehousing space
and limited land has led to developers targeting infill development sites that can be scraped for modern
warehouse construction. The overall Southern California industrial market, which includes the five county area of Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside and
Orange Counties recently surpassed 2 billion SF of
industrial inventory.

As more of a structural issue that needs to be addressed long term, the prohibitive cost of housing in L.A. is a major impediment to hiring and is often cited as a
motivating factor for companies to relocate to other parts of the country. Recent departures include construction
giant AECOM. However, the aerospace industry is strong
and major employers such as SpaceX, Rocket Lab and
Relativity Space help sustain the diverse Los Angeles
economy.

Despite near-term issues related to the pandemic, the
metro economy possesses many positive attributes. It
has two major talent generators in USC and UCLA along
with top tier universities such as Cal Tech that support a growing tech economy. It is perennially among the top
five metros in the country for venture capital investment.

The metro is an attractive location for immigrants and
educated talent. More people making six-figure
paychecks continue to move to L.A. than are leaving.

Education levels, while below the national average,
improve every year.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Economy Los Angeles Retail

LOS ANGELES EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN THOUSANDS
Industry Jobs LQ MarketUS USMarketUSMarket
CURRENT JOBS CURRENT GROWTH 10 YR HISTORICAL 5 YR FORECAST -0.16%-0.46%0.75%-1.58%4.89%2.74%0.9319Manufacturing

0.25%0.69%1.00%0.90%4.55%7.36%1.0831Trade, Transportation and Utilities

0.22%0.72%0.49%0.16%3.56%6.87%0.9405 Retail Trade

0.52%0.49%1.46%0.53%2.47%4.21%0.9222Financial Activities

0.82%1.11%-0.11%-0.14%-0.10%-0.26%0.9546Government

0.56%0.69%2.65%3.78%5.68%7.21%0.7158Natural Resources, Mining and Construction

1.14%1.37%1.84%2.59%6.02%6.29%1.2870Education and Health Services

1.09%1.10%2.03%1.46%6.99%7.92%1.0620Professional and Business Services

1.64%3.29%0.56%0.12%7.33%13.44%2.3193Information

2.55%4.74%1.19%1.42%15.31%21.08%1.0458Leisure and Hospitality

0.76%2.77%0.56%-0.28%5.40%9.66%0.8137Other Services
Total Employment 4,354 1.0 7.27% 5.46% 0.99% 1.18% 1.48% 0.89% Source: Oxford Economics
LQ = Location Quotient
Source: Oxford Economics

JOB GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Economy Los Angeles Retail
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE (%)

NET EMPLOYMENT CHANGE (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 21 Economy Los Angeles Retail

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
POPULATION GROWTH (YOY %)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 22 Economy Los Angeles Retail

NET POPULATION CHANGE (YOY)

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
12 Month ChangeCurrent Level
Metro USMetro USDemographic Category
10 Year Change
Metro US Metro US
5 Year Forecast
Population 330,367,5009,903,349 -0.4% 0.2% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.5% Households 123,394,6093,288,566 -0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% 0% 0.4% Median Household Income $74,364$83,172 6.1% 6.0% 4.8% 4.0% 2.9% 2.5% Labor Force 162,784,4695,037,628 2.9% 1.5% 0.3% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% Unemployment 5.8%10.0% -5.6% -2.9% -0.2% -0.3% - -
Source: Oxford Economics

POPULATION GROWTH
Source: Oxford Economics

LABOR FORCE GROWTH

INCOME GROWTH
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 23 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

LOS ANGELES SUBMARKETS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 24 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 1 190th Street Corridor 350 0.1% 44 0 - - -24 4 22 6.3% 11 2 Antelope Valley 15,898 3.6% 10 1 4 0% 231,188 3 28 0.2% 10 3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 10,664 2.4% 16 1 5 0% 221,295 0 0 0% - 4 Beverly Hills 3,706 0.8% 30 0 - - -363 0 0 0% -
5 Brentwood 810 0.2% 43 0 - - -95 0 0 0% -
6 Burbank 8,312 1.9% 20 2 30 0.4% 131,128 0 0 0% -
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 3,142 0.7% 32 0 - - -210 0 0 0% - 8 Catalina Island 94 0% 49 0 - - -21 0 0 0% -
9 Century City 1,065 0.2% 42 1 94 8.8% 56 0 0 0% -
10 Culver City 6,562 1.5% 24 2 119 1.8% 4753 4 57 0.9% 5 11 Downtown Los Angeles 16,972 3.8% 8 2 329 1.9% 1975 0 0 0% - 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 8,948 2.0% 19 2 9 0.1% 171,305 1 178 2.0% 1 13 East LA County Outlying 119 0% 46 0 - - -21 0 0 0% - 14 Eastern SFV 18,751 4.2% 6 3 20 0.1% 162,060 0 0 0% - 15 Eastern SGV 41,853 9.4% 2 3 74 0.2% 103,490 2 14 0% 15 16 El Segundo 2,690 0.6% 33 4 21 0.8% 15177 1 53 2.0% 6 17 Encino 1,726 0.4% 39 0 - - -107 0 0 0% -
18 Glendale 16,328 3.6% 9 0 - - -2,330 3 3 0% 22
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 10,244 2.3% 18 1 4 0% 241,170 2 9 0.1% 18 20 Hollywood 4,854 1.1% 27 2 6 0.1% 20448 0 0 0% -
21 Inglewood/South LA 13,671 3.1% 12 1 320 2.3% 21,973 1 5 0% 19 22 Koreatown 10,843 2.4% 15 0 - - -1,065 1 4 0% 20
23 LAX 1,614 0.4% 40 0 - - -119 0 0 0% -
24 Long Beach: Downtown 6,877 1.5% 23 0 - - -968 1 4 0.1% 21 25 Long Beach: Suburban 13,217 3.0% 13 2 5 0% 211,412 1 42 0.3% 7 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 5,537 1.2% 26 1 9 0.2% 18776 3 68 1.2% 3 27 Mid-Cities 50,173 11.2% 1 3 24 0% 146,231 5 33 0.1% 8 28 Miracle Mile 2,332 0.5% 35 0 - - -307 0 0 0% -
29 NE LA County Outlying 160 0% 45 0 - - -25 0 0 0% -
30 North Hollywood 6,241 1.4% 25 1 44 0.7% 11931 1 33 0.5% 9 31 NW LA County Outlying 112 0% 47 0 - - -6 0 0 0% -
32 Olympic Corridor 2,466 0.6% 34 0 - - -278 0 0 0% -
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 1,232 0.3% 41 1 7 0.6% 19137 0 0 0% - 34 Park Mile 2,054 0.5% 38 0 - - -205 0 0 0% -
35 Pasadena 14,810 3.3% 11 0 - - -1,624 1 105 0.7% 2
36 Santa Clarita Valley 12,885 2.9% 14 0 - - -786 7 62 0.5% 4 37 Santa Monica 7,043 1.6% 22 3 78 1.1% 8812 0 0 0% -
38 Santa Monica Mountains 106 0% 48 0 - - -15 0 0 0% -
39 Sherman Oaks 4,162 0.9% 29 0 - - -355 1 2 0.1% 23
40 Southeast Los Angeles 23,869 5.3% 4 13 154 0.6% 32,947 2 16 0.1% 14 41 Studio/Universal Cities 3,466 0.8% 31 1 94 2.7% 5475 0 0 0% - 42 Tarzana 2,312 0.5% 36 0 - - -240 0 0 0% -
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 25 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 43 Torrance 19,192 4.3% 5 2 30 0.2% 121,215 6 17 0.1% 13 44 West Hollywood 10,336 2.3% 17 3 78 0.8% 91,287 3 9 0.1% 17 45 West Los Angeles 4,549 1.0% 28 0 - - -682 0 0 0% -
46 Western SFV 17,767 4.0% 7 0 - - -1,578 1 18 0.1% 12
47 Western SGV 27,001 6.0% 3 7 92 0.3% 73,009 2 13 0% 16 48 Westwood 2,289 0.5% 37 0 - - -243 0 0 0% -
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 8,172 1.8% 21 0 - - -415 0 0 0% - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 26 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
1 190th Street Corridor -0.7%33 0.2% 13$30.19 45
2 Antelope Valley -0.6%46 1.0% 6$23.29 40
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes -0.6%23 -0.2% 25$36.40 34
4 Beverly Hills -0.3%1 -0.4% 35$94.66 8
5 Brentwood -0.5%5 -0.4% 38$64.03 18
6 Burbank -0.1%19 -0.3% 29$37.65 1
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill -0.5%16 -0.1% 21$39.58 26
8 Catalina Island -0.4%44 5.9% 1$24.59 12
9 Century City -0.7%13 -0.5% 39$43.31 44
10 Culver City -0.6%17 -0.3% 30$39.07 30
11 Downtown Los Angeles -5.7%24 -0.3% 28$35.70 48
12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake -0.4%21 -0.4% 36$37.23 10 13 East LA County Outlying -0.4%47 4.9% 2$22.30 11
14 Eastern SFV -0.5%38 0.9% 7$27.36 23
15 Eastern SGV -0.5%45 0.6% 9$24.20 25
16 El Segundo -0.6%10 -0.3% 27$45.05 29
17 Encino -0.6%22 -0.2% 26$37 31
18 Glendale -0.6%26 -0.2% 23$35.52 33
19 Hawthorne/Gardena -0.3%41 0.1% 17$26.15 6
20 Hollywood -0.5%8 -0.4% 33$52.93 16
21 Inglewood/South LA -0.5%43 -0.2% 22$24.72 20
22 Koreatown -0.4%29 -0.5% 40$32.62 13
23 LAX -0.5%31 0% 19$30.78 24
24 Long Beach: Downtown -0.5%30 -0.5% 42$32.12 22
25 Long Beach: Suburban -0.6%37 -0.2% 24$28.10 32
26 Marina Del Rey/Venice -0.8%6 -0.3% 32$56.92 46
27 Mid-Cities -1.1%42 0.2% 15$25.83 47
28 Miracle Mile -10.0%27 -0.9% 48$35.52 49
29 NE LA County Outlying -0.6%49 3.6% 3$17.55 37
30 North Hollywood -0.5%32 0.2% 12$30.66 19
31 NW LA County Outlying -0.4%48 1.5% 5$19.70 14
32 Olympic Corridor -0.6%11 -1.0% 49$43.96 38
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu -0.5%2 0.7% 8$73.43 27
34 Park Mile -0.5%39 -0.6% 45$27.32 21
35 Pasadena -0.4%20 -0.3% 31$37.33 15
36 Santa Clarita Valley -0.6%35 0.5% 10$29.35 42
37 Santa Monica -0.3%3 -0.6% 44$69.29 3
38 Santa Monica Mountains -0.3%7 2.7% 4$53.42 5
39 Sherman Oaks -0.5%14 -0.6% 46$39.72 17
40 Southeast Los Angeles -0.6%40 0.2% 14$26.31 36
41 Studio/Universal Cities -0.4%12 -0.6% 47$43.36 9
42 Tarzana -0.6%28 0% 18$34.37 35
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 27 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
43 Torrance -0.2%25 0% 20$35.53 2
44 West Hollywood -0.3%4 -0.5% 41$64.40 7
45 West Los Angeles -0.5%15 -0.5% 43$39.65 28
46 Western SFV -0.6%36 0.4% 11$28.11 39
47 Western SGV -0.6%34 0.2% 16$29.35 41
48 Westwood -0.3%9 -0.4% 37$49.32 4
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr -0.7%18 -0.4% 34$38.79 43
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 28 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
1 190th Street Corridor 22,144 6.3% 16.21,370 0.4% 2436 2 Antelope Valley 1,056,741 6.6% 0.2113,622 0.7% 338
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 532,554 5.0% -(17,186) -0.2% 3622 4 Beverly Hills 259,261 7.0% -(32,902) -0.9% 4140
5 Brentwood 77,913 9.6% -(14,035) -1.7% 3344
6 Burbank 453,279 5.5% -(54,179) -0.7% 4526
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 180,995 5.8% -(20,770) -0.7% 3832 8 Catalina Island - - -0 0% --
9 Century City 4,594 0.4% -1,206 0.1% 252
10 Culver City 227,833 3.5% 1.236,738 0.6% 139
11 Downtown Los Angeles 1,064,173 6.3% -(44,185) -0.3% 4335 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 508,534 5.7% -100,194 1.1% 531 13 East LA County Outlying - - -0 0% --
14 Eastern SFV 883,762 4.7% -66,598 0.4% 717
15 Eastern SGV 2,450,260 5.9% -(288,339) -0.7% 4933
16 El Segundo 88,070 3.3% 8.17,239 0.3% 227
17 Encino 89,536 5.2% -(1,971) -0.1% 3123
18 Glendale 483,983 3.0% -(20,154) -0.1% 375
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 1,186,282 11.6% -(24,842) -0.2% 4046 20 Hollywood 266,195 5.5% -(24,115) -0.5% 3927
21 Inglewood/South LA 440,163 3.2% 0.235,563 0.3% 146
22 Koreatown 527,934 4.9% -(76,365) -0.7% 4621
23 LAX 26,943 1.7% -13,051 0.8% 213
24 Long Beach: Downtown 324,271 4.7% 0.143,906 0.6% 1118 25 Long Beach: Suburban 565,146 4.3% 1.042,409 0.3% 1215 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 395,984 7.2% 1.257,271 1.0% 841 27 Mid-Cities 2,402,857 4.8% 0152,175 0.3% 219
28 Miracle Mile 278,860 12.0% -6,191 0.3% 2347
29 NE LA County Outlying 5,635 3.5% -13,178 8.2% 2010
30 North Hollywood 300,690 4.8% -(6,870) -0.1% 3220
31 NW LA County Outlying 453 0.4% -(453) -0.4% 281
32 Olympic Corridor 216,846 8.8% -(15,042) -0.6% 3443
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 73,303 5.9% -(588) 0% 2934
34 Park Mile 108,418 5.3% -(15,516) -0.8% 3524
35 Pasadena 816,333 5.5% 1.570,288 0.5% 629
36 Santa Clarita Valley 709,308 5.5% 0.6101,496 0.8% 428 37 Santa Monica 586,951 8.3% -(139,087) -2.0% 4742
38 Santa Monica Mountains 7,278 6.9% -(1,633) -1.5% 3039 39 Sherman Oaks 112,089 2.7% -19,816 0.5% 174
40 Southeast Los Angeles 1,020,350 4.3% 0.245,594 0.2% 1014 41 Studio/Universal Cities 147,265 4.2% -19,649 0.6% 1813 42 Tarzana 76,837 3.3% -15,295 0.7% 198
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 29 Submarkets Los Angeles Retail

SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
43 Torrance 751,636 3.9% -(39,717) -0.2% 4212
44 West Hollywood 674,505 6.5% 0.154,781 0.5% 937
45 West Los Angeles 253,326 5.6% -34,261 0.8% 1530
46 Western SFV 949,132 5.3% 0.1167,737 0.9% 125
47 Western SGV 990,623 3.7% -(149,985) -0.6% 4811
48 Westwood 263,685 11.5% -(47,995) -2.1% 4445
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 367,277 4.5% -20,367 0.2% 1616 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 30 Supply & Demand Trends Los Angeles Retail

OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 1,422,676 0.3% 0.3%1,242,060 1.1450,562,438
2024 1,207,065 0.3% 0.3%1,527,697 0.8449,139,762
2023 288,776 0.1% 0.4%1,972,774 0.1447,932,697
2022 90,981 0% 0.3%1,516,265 0.1447,643,921
2021 576,446 0.1% 0.2%852,292 0.7447,552,940
YTD 131,037 0% 0.2%701,404 0.2447,107,531
2020 952,812 0.2% -0.4%(1,984,105) -446,976,494
2019 344,717 0.1% -0.3%(1,125,036) -446,023,682
2018 (38,464) 0% -0.3%(1,252,133) -445,678,965
2017 1,229,741 0.3% 0.2%964,254 1.3445,717,429
2016 56,651 0% 0.8%3,527,870 0444,487,688
2015 2,162,930 0.5% 0.3%1,373,114 1.6444,431,037
2014 382,648 0.1% 0.5%2,285,331 0.2442,268,107
2013 513,379 0.1% 0.5%2,383,621 0.2441,885,459
2012 936,546 0.2% 0%(215,406) -441,372,080
2011 617,549 0.1% 0.3%1,401,717 0.4440,435,534
2010 1,370,182 0.3% 0.4%1,789,981 0.8439,817,985
2009 1,827,634 0.4% -0.7%(3,199,341) -438,447,803

MALLS SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 436,190 1.0% 1.0%428,344 1.043,883,515
2024 396,105 0.9% 1.0%431,008 0.943,447,325
2023 179,720 0.4% 0.8%350,313 0.543,051,220
2022 (64,029) -0.1% 0.4%169,237 -42,871,500
2021 77,360 0.2% 0.1%29,311 2.642,935,529
YTD 53,300 0.1% -0.4%(176,791) -42,911,469
2020 328,706 0.8% -0.2%(78,744) -42,858,169
2019 629,410 1.5% 0.2%75,218 8.442,529,463
2018 8,670 0% -0.1%(31,636) -41,900,053
2017 7,050 0% -0.5%(219,438) -41,891,383
2016 128,000 0.3% 0.8%315,390 0.441,884,333
2015 1,471,281 3.7% 2.5%1,029,243 1.441,756,333
2014 236,192 0.6% 0.6%232,155 1.040,285,052
2013 142,443 0.4% 0.4%172,845 0.840,048,860
2012 226,999 0.6% 0.9%359,422 0.639,906,417
2011 (2,050) 0% 0.1%44,209 -39,679,418
2010 143,768 0.4% 1.4%557,038 0.339,681,468
2009 210,781 0.5% -1.3%(500,965) -39,537,700
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 31 Supply & Demand Trends Los Angeles Retail

POWER CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (34,528) -0.1% -0.2%(36,875) -23,712,023
2024 (35,216) -0.1% 0%(4,530) -23,746,551
2023 (39,278) -0.2% 0.2%41,780 -23,781,767
2022 (44,146) -0.2% 0.1%15,253 -23,821,045
2021 (1,568) 0% 0.9%213,098 -23,865,191
YTD 5,000 0% 1.1%252,255 023,871,759
2020 0 0% -0.8%(184,259) -23,866,759
2019 8,000 0% -0.2%(46,371) -23,866,759
2018 323,252 1.4% 1.4%327,465 1.023,858,759
2017 90,970 0.4% 1.3%312,831 0.323,535,507
2016 348,315 1.5% 0.6%129,448 2.723,444,537
2015 299,608 1.3% 1.4%312,328 1.023,096,222
2014 311,373 1.4% 1.6%356,292 0.922,796,614
2013 5,500 0% 0.6%136,241 022,485,241
2012 0 0% -0.3%(61,057) -22,479,741
2011 313,754 1.4% 0.9%201,590 1.622,479,741
2010 210,693 1.0% 2.8%616,392 0.322,165,987
2009 763,355 3.6% 0.7%155,077 4.921,955,294

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 350,558 0.3% 0.3%310,899 1.1103,169,326
2024 304,923 0.3% 0.4%454,058 0.7102,818,768
2023 82,029 0.1% 0.7%704,273 0.1102,513,845
2022 (105,515) -0.1% 0.2%248,610 -102,431,816
2021 382,418 0.4% -0.1%(97,108) -102,537,331
YTD 148,519 0.1% -0.2%(178,994) -102,303,432
2020 202,528 0.2% -0.4%(412,932) -102,154,913
2019 171,163 0.2% -0.1%(70,736) -101,952,385
2018 79,952 0.1% -0.6%(631,155) -101,781,222
2017 257,585 0.3% 0.3%316,863 0.8101,701,270
2016 353,517 0.3% 1.1%1,140,277 0.3101,443,685
2015 474,803 0.5% 0.3%281,157 1.7101,090,168
2014 292,594 0.3% 0.8%766,347 0.4100,615,365
2013 292,974 0.3% 0.5%534,755 0.5100,322,771
2012 158,637 0.2% -0.2%(212,198) -100,029,797
2011 450,025 0.5% 0.5%469,579 1.099,871,160
2010 663,911 0.7% 0.1%142,399 4.799,421,135
2009 633,829 0.6% -0.6%(546,214) -98,757,224
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 32 Supply & Demand Trends Los Angeles Retail

STRIP CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 39,434 0.1% 0%12,429 3.236,090,431
2024 31,271 0.1% 0.2%58,125 0.536,050,997
2023 (13,383) 0% 0.3%120,099 -36,019,726
2022 (45,432) -0.1% 0.1%52,806 -36,033,109
2021 19,360 0.1% 0.2%62,489 0.336,078,541
YTD 22,144 0.1% 0.3%90,396 0.236,081,325
2020 65,663 0.2% -0.5%(178,999) -36,059,181
2019 38,173 0.1% -0.4%(141,114) -35,993,518
2018 52,628 0.1% 0.3%107,357 0.535,955,345
2017 35,830 0.1% 0.1%50,651 0.735,902,717
2016 101,557 0.3% 1.2%429,726 0.235,866,887
2015 60,063 0.2% 0.9%337,186 0.235,765,330
2014 69,086 0.2% 1.2%414,333 0.235,705,267
2013 140,601 0.4% 0.9%338,116 0.435,636,181
2012 137,360 0.4% 0.1%20,754 6.635,495,580
2011 73,372 0.2% -0.3%(92,659) -35,358,220
2010 135,141 0.4% 0.2%66,311 2.035,284,848
2009 94,306 0.3% -0.5%(181,616) -35,149,707

GENERAL RETAIL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 623,875 0.3% 0.2%524,608 1.2240,953,791
2024 503,842 0.2% 0.2%580,540 0.9240,329,916
2023 78,777 0% 0.3%740,707 0.1239,826,074
2022 355,295 0.1% 0.4%1,030,017 0.3239,747,297
2021 100,228 0% 0.3%648,462 0.2239,392,002
YTD (97,926) 0% 0.3%711,117 -239,193,848
2020 348,415 0.1% -0.4%(1,058,356) -239,291,774
2019 (591,888) -0.2% -0.4%(1,014,949) -238,943,359
2018 (502,966) -0.2% -0.4%(1,001,758) -239,535,247
2017 838,306 0.4% 0.2%559,589 1.5240,038,213
2016 (874,738) -0.4% 0.6%1,491,084 -239,199,907
2015 (142,825) -0.1% -0.2%(594,997) -240,074,645
2014 (526,597) -0.2% 0.2%447,371 -240,217,470
2013 (68,139) 0% 0.5%1,197,883 -240,744,067
2012 413,550 0.2% -0.1%(310,557) -240,812,206
2011 (217,552) -0.1% 0.3%750,179 -240,398,656
2010 216,669 0.1% 0.2%469,191 0.5240,616,208
2009 125,363 0.1% -0.9%(2,136,146) -240,399,539
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 33 Supply & Demand Trends Los Angeles Retail

OTHER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 7,147 0.3% 0.1%2,655 2.72,753,352
2024 6,140 0.2% 0.3%8,496 0.72,746,205
2023 911 0% 0.6%15,602 0.12,740,065
2022 (5,192) -0.2% 0%342 -2,739,154
2021 (1,352) 0% -0.1%(3,960) -2,744,346
YTD 0 0% 0.1%3,421 02,745,698
2020 7,500 0.3% -2.6%(70,815) -2,745,698
2019 89,859 3.4% 2.7%72,916 1.22,738,198
2018 0 0% -0.8%(22,406) -2,648,339
2017 0 0% -2.1%(56,242) -2,648,339
2016 0 0% 0.8%21,945 02,648,339
2015 0 0% 0.3%8,197 02,648,339
2014 0 0% 2.6%68,833 02,648,339
2013 0 0% 0.1%3,781 02,648,339
2012 0 0% -0.4%(11,770) -2,648,339
2011 0 0% 1.1%28,819 02,648,339
2010 0 0% -2.3%(61,350) -2,648,339
2009 0 0% 0.4%10,523 02,648,339
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 34 Rent & Vacancy Los Angeles Retail

OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 129 2.0% 12.9%$37.61 20,183,653 4.5% 0%
2024 127 3.1% 10.7%$36.86 20,094,672 4.5% -0.1%
2023 123 4.6% 7.4%$35.76 20,462,855 4.6% -0.4%
2022 117 3.0% 2.7%$34.20 22,122,188 4.9% -0.3%
2021 114 0.6% -0.3%$33.21 23,459,152 5.2% -0.1%
YTD 114 0% -0.4%$33.18 23,100,571 5.2% -0.1%
2020 113 -0.8% -0.8%$33.03 23,679,746 5.3% 0.6%
2019 114 2.2% 0%$33.30 20,763,555 4.7% 0.3%
2018 112 2.3% -2.2%$32.58 19,362,899 4.3% 0.3%
2017 109 3.4% -4.4%$31.84 18,124,897 4.1% 0.1%
2016 106 3.1% -7.6%$30.78 17,797,985 4.0% -0.8%
2015 103 4.4% -10.3%$29.87 21,284,090 4.8% 0.1%
2014 98 4.2% -14.1%$28.61 20,751,256 4.7% -0.4%
2013 94 3.1% -17.5%$27.46 22,654,007 5.1% -0.4%
2012 91 1.2% -20.0%$26.63 24,522,913 5.6% 0.2%
2011 90 -0.8% -21.0%$26.31 23,370,961 5.3% -0.2%
2010 91 -3.8% -20.4%$26.52 24,166,229 5.5% -0.1%
2009 95 -5.3% -17.2%$27.58 24,589,898 5.6% 1.1%

MALLS RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 137 1.9% 11.2%$49.06 2,917,796 6.6% -0.1%
2024 134 3.0% 9.1%$48.15 2,910,877 6.7% -0.1%
2023 130 4.4% 6.0%$46.77 2,946,730 6.8% -0.4%
2022 125 2.8% 1.5%$44.77 3,117,464 7.3% -0.5%
2021 121 0.6% -1.3%$43.54 3,350,111 7.8% 0.1%
YTD 121 -0.4% -1.4%$43.51 3,530,038 8.2% 0.5%
2020 121 -1.9% -1.9%$43.28 3,299,947 7.7% 0.9%
2019 123 2.5% 0%$44.13 2,892,497 6.8% 1.2%
2018 120 2.7% -2.4%$43.07 2,338,305 5.6% 0.1%
2017 117 3.6% -4.9%$41.95 2,297,999 5.5% 0.5%
2016 113 4.0% -8.2%$40.50 2,071,511 4.9% -0.5%
2015 108 5.4% -11.8%$38.93 2,258,901 5.4% 0.3%
2014 103 4.7% -16.3%$36.93 2,073,845 5.1% 0%
2013 98 4.0% -20.0%$35.28 2,069,808 5.2% -0.1%
2012 95 1.9% -23.1%$33.94 2,100,210 5.3% -0.4%
2011 93 0.5% -24.6%$33.29 2,232,633 5.6% -0.1%
2010 92 -3.3% -24.9%$33.14 2,278,892 5.7% -1.1%
2009 96 -4.5% -22.3%$34.27 2,692,162 6.8% 1.8%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 35 Rent & Vacancy Los Angeles Retail

POWER CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 133 2.1% 13.3%$36.87 791,316 3.3% 0%
2024 130 3.2% 11.0%$36.10 787,796 3.3% -0.1%
2023 126 4.7% 7.5%$34.97 817,266 3.4% -0.3%
2022 121 3.1% 2.7%$33.41 897,192 3.8% -0.2%
2021 117 0.6% -0.4%$32.40 955,537 4.0% -0.9%
YTD 117 -0.1% -0.5%$32.36 922,415 3.9% -1.1%
2020 116 -1.0% -1.0%$32.21 1,174,670 4.9% 0.8%
2019 117 2.3% 0%$32.54 990,411 4.1% 0.2%
2018 115 3.1% -2.2%$31.81 936,040 3.9% -0.1%
2017 111 3.9% -5.1%$30.86 940,253 4.0% -1.0%
2016 107 3.4% -8.7%$29.72 1,162,114 5.0% 0.9%
2015 104 5.0% -11.7%$28.74 943,247 4.1% -0.1%
2014 99 4.1% -15.9%$27.36 955,967 4.2% -0.3%
2013 95 3.1% -19.2%$26.28 1,000,886 4.5% -0.6%
2012 92 1.4% -21.7%$25.48 1,131,627 5.0% 0.3%
2011 91 -0.6% -22.8%$25.12 1,070,570 4.8% 0.4%
2010 91 -4.7% -22.3%$25.27 958,406 4.3% -1.9%
2009 96 -4.4% -18.5%$26.51 1,364,105 6.2% 2.6%

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 127 1.9% 13.4%$35.13 6,255,242 6.1% 0%
2024 125 3.0% 11.2%$34.46 6,223,547 6.1% -0.2%
2023 121 4.5% 8.0%$33.46 6,376,706 6.2% -0.6%
2022 116 2.9% 3.4%$32.02 7,000,570 6.8% -0.3%
2021 113 0.6% 0.5%$31.13 7,348,019 7.2% 0.4%
YTD 113 0.3% 0.4%$31.10 7,192,163 7.0% 0.3%
2020 112 -0.2% -0.2%$30.93 6,864,650 6.7% 0.6%
2019 112 2.4% 0%$30.98 6,247,530 6.1% 0.2%
2018 109 2.3% -2.3%$30.26 6,005,631 5.9% 0.7%
2017 107 3.7% -4.5%$29.58 5,271,129 5.2% 0%
2016 103 2.9% -7.9%$28.52 5,290,444 5.2% -0.8%
2015 100 4.1% -10.6%$27.71 6,077,204 6.0% 0.2%
2014 96 3.8% -14.0%$26.63 5,883,558 5.8% -0.5%
2013 93 2.4% -17.2%$25.64 6,357,311 6.3% -0.3%
2012 91 0.7% -19.2%$25.04 6,599,092 6.6% 0.4%
2011 90 -1.0% -19.7%$24.86 6,228,257 6.2% -0.1%
2010 91 -3.6% -18.9%$25.12 6,255,280 6.3% 0.5%
2009 94 -5.7% -15.9%$26.06 5,733,768 5.8% 1.2%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 36 Rent & Vacancy Los Angeles Retail

STRIP CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 125 2.0% 13.9%$33 1,708,551 4.7% 0%
2024 122 3.1% 11.7%$32.36 1,689,389 4.7% -0.1%
2023 119 4.6% 8.3%$31.39 1,722,180 4.8% -0.4%
2022 114 2.9% 3.6%$30.02 1,850,156 5.1% -0.2%
2021 110 0.7% 0.7%$29.17 1,941,085 5.4% -0.1%
YTD 110 0.3% 0.6%$29.14 1,914,945 5.3% -0.2%
2020 110 0.2% 0%$28.97 1,983,197 5.5% 0.7%
2019 109 2.3% -0.2%$28.92 1,738,535 4.8% 0.5%
2018 107 2.2% -2.4%$28.26 1,570,042 4.4% -0.2%
2017 105 3.2% -4.6%$27.64 1,627,057 4.5% 0%
2016 101 2.7% -7.6%$26.78 1,641,878 4.6% -0.9%
2015 99 3.9% -10.0%$26.08 1,970,047 5.5% -0.8%
2014 95 3.8% -13.3%$25.11 2,247,170 6.3% -1.0%
2013 91 2.3% -16.5%$24.19 2,592,485 7.3% -0.6%
2012 89 0.6% -18.4%$23.65 2,790,000 7.9% 0.3%
2011 89 -1.4% -18.8%$23.52 2,673,394 7.6% 0.5%
2010 90 -4.2% -17.7%$23.85 2,507,363 7.1% 0.2%
2009 94 -5.9% -14.1%$24.89 2,441,043 6.9% 0.8%

GENERAL RETAIL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 128 2.1% 13.0%$37.32 8,307,491 3.4% 0%
2024 126 3.1% 10.7%$36.56 8,284,208 3.4% -0.1%
2023 122 4.6% 7.3%$35.45 8,398,720 3.5% -0.3%
2022 117 3.0% 2.6%$33.89 9,040,864 3.8% -0.3%
2021 113 0.5% -0.4%$32.89 9,643,001 4.0% -0.2%
YTD 113 -0.1% -0.6%$32.85 9,325,692 3.9% -0.3%
2020 113 -0.9% -0.9%$32.72 10,138,543 4.2% 0.6%
2019 114 2.1% 0%$33.03 8,754,158 3.7% 0.2%
2018 111 2.2% -2.0%$32.36 8,389,400 3.5% 0.2%
2017 109 3.3% -4.1%$31.67 7,887,384 3.3% 0.1%
2016 105 2.9% -7.2%$30.66 7,587,205 3.2% -1.0%
2015 103 4.3% -9.8%$29.81 9,967,913 4.2% 0.2%
2014 98 4.3% -13.5%$28.58 9,515,741 4.0% -0.4%
2013 94 3.3% -17.0%$27.40 10,489,709 4.4% -0.5%
2012 91 1.3% -19.7%$26.52 11,754,395 4.9% 0.3%
2011 90 -0.9% -20.8%$26.17 11,030,288 4.6% -0.4%
2010 91 -3.9% -20.0%$26.42 12,001,650 5.0% -0.1%
2009 95 -5.4% -16.7%$27.50 12,255,532 5.1% 0.9%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 37 Rent & Vacancy Los Angeles Retail

OTHER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 130 2.0% 12.8%$43.98 203,257 7.4% 0.1%
2024 127 3.0% 10.6%$43.13 198,855 7.2% -0.1%
2023 124 4.5% 7.4%$41.86 201,253 7.3% -0.5%
2022 118 2.9% 2.7%$40.05 215,942 7.9% -0.2%
2021 115 0.6% -0.2%$38.91 221,399 8.1% 0.1%
YTD 115 0% -0.3%$38.88 215,318 7.8% -0.1%
2020 114 -0.8% -0.8%$38.68 218,739 8.0% 2.8%
2019 115 2.3% 0%$38.98 140,424 5.1% 0.5%
2018 113 2.2% -2.2%$38.12 123,481 4.7% 0.8%
2017 110 3.7% -4.3%$37.30 101,075 3.8% 2.1%
2016 106 3.3% -7.7%$35.98 44,833 1.7% -0.8%
2015 103 4.5% -10.7%$34.82 66,778 2.5% -0.3%
2014 98 4.1% -14.5%$33.32 74,975 2.8% -2.6%
2013 95 3.1% -17.9%$32.01 143,808 5.4% -0.1%
2012 92 1.1% -20.4%$31.04 147,589 5.6% 0.4%
2011 91 -0.8% -21.2%$30.71 135,819 5.1% -1.1%
2010 91 -3.2% -20.6%$30.95 164,638 6.2% 2.3%
2009 94 -5.5% -18.0%$31.97 103,288 3.9% -0.4%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 38 Sale Trends Los Angeles Retail

OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 181- $441.83 5.4%
2024 -- - -- 178- $435.39 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 174- $423.77 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 165- $403.08 5.3%
2021 -- - -- 160- $391.04 5.4%
YTD $3.1B1,167 2.2% $329.01$2,813,402 1595.1% $389.45 5.4% 2020 $4B1,145 2.2% $407.60$3,627,578 1595.2% $387.07 5.4% 2019 $4.8B1,877 3.1% $440.54$3,573,936 1595.2% $389.11 5.4% 2018 $4.9B2,671 6.2% $432.24$3,245,611 1545.0% $375.35 5.4% 2017 $3.8B3,036 4.6% $346.28$2,724,889 1505.1% $365.73 5.4% 2016 $4.7B2,503 4.3% $339.59$2,929,488 1455.4% $353.19 5.4% 2015 $5.4B2,846 4.9% $353.78$3,067,711 1385.7% $337.21 5.5% 2014 $5.1B2,597 5.6% $290.62$2,967,544 1276.0% $308.97 5.8% 2013 $4B2,144 4.2% $289.17$2,823,282 1096.3% $267.29 6.2% 2012 $2.8B1,803 3.7% $269.80$2,807,081 1046.9% $252.85 6.3% 2011 $1.8B1,538 2.9% $267.19$2,326,509 947.0% $229.88 6.7% 2010 $1.5B972 2.3% $210.06$2,105,279 897.4% $216.93 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.

MALLS SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 169- $424.33 5.3%
2024 -- - -- 166- $418.78 5.3%
2023 -- - -- 162- $408.22 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 155- $388.90 5.3%
2021 -- - -- 150- $377.96 5.3%
YTD $264.4M18 4.3% $141.96$14,689,260 150- $376.60 5.3% 2020 $581.6M3 1.6% $824.21$193,850,405 1508.9% $377.90 5.3% 2019 $325M1 1.1% $701.94$325,000,000 152- $381.46 5.2%
2018 $227.9M61 29.2% $334.30$32,560,714 1456.7% $365.24 5.3% 2017 $64M12 1.4% $152.39$9,141,201 1446.5% $361.56 5.2% 2016 $285M35 6.5% $197.84$15,831,553 1405.2% $351.02 5.3% 2015 $332.1M67 6.3% $333.64$25,546,457 1345.2% $337.30 5.3% 2014 $111.9M62 7.0% $109.42$15,980,516 125- $313.41 5.5% 2013 $842M25 8.3% $309.01$42,100,671 1085.2% $272.46 5.9% 2012 $217.9M23 4.9% $379.75$14,529,033 1036.9% $258.33 6.0% 2011 $4.3M5 0.3% $160.34$1,441,667 949.3% $237.19 6.3%
2010 $6.3M7 0.3% $199.54$1,260,000 906.8% $225.37 6.6%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 39 Sale Trends Los Angeles Retail

POWER CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 189- $396.95 5.3%
2024 -- - -- 186- $390.73 5.3%
2023 -- - -- 181- $379.86 5.2%
2022 -- - -- 172- $361 5.2%
2021 -- - -- 166- $349.92 5.3%
YTD $27.4M5 0.7% $159.59$5,475,000 166- $348.42 5.3%
2020 $61.8M6 1.0% $321.61$12,359,519 1636.6% $342.74 5.3% 2019 $259.2M28 5.7% $239.09$11,270,435 1645.7% $344.76 5.2% 2018 $396M39 5.1% $325.76$10,153,534 1555.7% $326.43 5.3% 2017 $14.9M36 5.6% $425.98$3,736,500 1525.4% $319.91 5.3% 2016 $53.7M37 2.8% $273.31$6,708,441 1485.6% $310.61 5.3% 2015 $284.5M22 3.7% $515.64$20,324,286 1426.3% $298.35 5.4% 2014 $566.5M66 13.8% $290.42$15,310,390 1286.0% $268.38 5.7% 2013 $107M49 3.8% $178.31$2,971,620 1116.8% $234.11 6.1% 2012 $197.3M26 5.5% $207.38$14,089,474 1057.2% $220.91 6.3% 2011 $5.6M20 4.7% $202.95$5,572,055 95- $198.90 6.6%
2010 $113.7M19 5.6% $123.34$7,106,875 898.8% $187.58 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 178- $380.50 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 176- $375.14 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 171- $365.32 5.4%
2022 -- - -- 163- $347.82 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 158- $337.87 5.5%
YTD $339.3M64 1.1% $352.86$7,069,727 1585.3% $336.63 5.5% 2020 $547.6M92 1.8% $306$6,080,150 1575.6% $334.75 5.4% 2019 $711.7M115 1.9% $378.23$7,286,648 1585.7% $337.30 5.4% 2018 $618M116 2.2% $323.42$6,179,851 1535.7% $325.52 5.5% 2017 $800.8M161 3.7% $290.52$7,024,445 1485.5% $316.21 5.5% 2016 $1B135 3.4% $326.08$8,725,931 1445.2% $306.19 5.5% 2015 $1.2B179 3.9% $322.62$7,178,981 1376.2% $292.57 5.6% 2014 $920.7M172 4.0% $265.86$6,325,229 1265.7% $268.70 5.8% 2013 $802.6M152 3.8% $249.92$6,310,619 1106.4% $233.79 6.2% 2012 $676.3M164 3.7% $248.20$5,932,642 1046.6% $221.63 6.4% 2011 $529.9M139 3.2% $329.22$7,515,725 946.9% $201.47 6.7% 2010 $346.9M88 2.1% $205.83$5,058,591 897.5% $190.39 7.0% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 40 Sale Trends Los Angeles Retail

STRIP CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 181- $434.63 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 179- $428.28 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 174- $416.82 5.4%
2022 -- - -- 165- $396.56 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 160- $384.99 5.4%
YTD $202.8M59 1.5% $376.52$3,612,858 1604.9% $383.50 5.5% 2020 $161.5M50 1.3% $356.67$3,351,263 1585.1% $379.32 5.4% 2019 $315.5M118 2.3% $429.71$3,411,341 1584.8% $379.82 5.4% 2018 $325.7M151 3.4% $375.25$3,298,059 1535.2% $367.27 5.5% 2017 $319M224 4.4% $349.22$2,900,095 1495.7% $357.59 5.5% 2016 $292.9M130 2.7% $331.29$2,746,309 1445.6% $345.15 5.5% 2015 $370.5M179 4.1% $307.07$2,938,042 1375.8% $329.24 5.6% 2014 $331.8M147 3.2% $323.88$2,765,326 1265.6% $301.63 5.8% 2013 $231.4M146 3.5% $240.04$2,117,831 1096.4% $260.96 6.2% 2012 $121.4M91 2.0% $260.78$2,167,524 1037.2% $247.70 6.4% 2011 $112.9M80 2.4% $190.22$2,204,269 947.3% $224.84 6.7% 2010 $77.6M63 1.5% $227.14$1,988,773 887.5% $212.13 7.0% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.

GENERAL RETAIL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 184- $477.78 5.4%
2024 -- - -- 181- $470.67 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 176- $457.96 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 168- $435.36 5.3%
2021 -- - -- 162- $422.03 5.4%
YTD $2.3B1,020 2.5% $383.75$2,330,495 1625.1% $420.21 5.4% 2020 $2.6B988 2.7% $415.74$2,751,775 1615.1% $417.29 5.4% 2019 $3.2B1,614 3.8% $473.38$2,828,689 1615.2% $419.06 5.3% 2018 $3.4B2,302 4.4% $499.67$2,638,609 1564.8% $405.19 5.4% 2017 $2.6B2,601 5.4% $379.48$2,245,179 1524.9% $393.68 5.4% 2016 $3.1B2,164 4.8% $372.17$2,237,662 1465.4% $379.34 5.4% 2015 $3.1B2,394 5.1% $365.38$2,144,466 1395.6% $361.57 5.5% 2014 $3.1B2,145 5.7% $314.27$2,243,802 1276.1% $330.40 5.8% 2013 $2B1,759 3.8% $318.03$1,793,108 1106.3% $284.80 6.2% 2012 $1.5B1,494 3.6% $270.97$1,874,249 1046.8% $269.03 6.3% 2011 $1.1B1,283 3.1% $256.08$1,769,307 947.0% $244.20 6.7% 2010 $919.8M793 2.5% $230.40$1,618,552 897.3% $230.08 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 41 Sale Trends Los Angeles Retail

OTHER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 127- $346.54 6.1%
2024 -- - -- 125- $341.42 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 122- $332.22 6.0%
2022 -- - -- 116- $316.29 6.0%
2021 -- - -- 113- $307.35 6.1%
YTD $01 6.2% -- 112- $306.33 6.1%
2020 $37.2M6 14.4% $94.04$6,206,094 121- $329.16 5.9%
2019 $300K1 0% $306.12- 122- $332.19 5.8%
2018 $2.8M2 0.4% $292.42$2,780,000 115- $314.73 5.9%
2017 $02 0.7% -- 126- $342.62 5.7%
2016 $570K2 0.1% $276.56- 1215.8% $330.95 5.7%
2015 $134.1M5 14.2% $357.32$66,358,335 1165.8% $315.90 5.8% 2014 $3.6M5 0.4% $313.14$2,213,000 117- $319.77 5.7%
2013 $4.6M13 0.5% $316.09- 102- $277.87 6.1%
2012 $100M5 6.6% $570.19$98,850,000 966.0% $263.35 6.3% 2011 $4.2M11 3.9% $256.82$1,360,000 95- $260.40 6.4%
2010 $605K2 0.1% $583.41- 90- $245.60 6.6%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 42

Appendix C-3 7
Appendix C-1: Additional Data on Inventory Sties under PlaceType Scenario.....C-3-1 Appendix C-37
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 3
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
Appendix C-3: Additional Data on Inventory Sites under PlaceType Scenario The following table lists the sites selected in the site inventory under the PlaceTypes scenario and provides detailed information about each site, including existing use, lot coverage and land-to-improvement value. The table represents sites that met the criteria outlined in the methodology at the time the analysis was conducted. The projected housing needs for extremely low income households are estimated at 50 percent of the very low income RHNA. However, for purposes of identifying sites for RHNA, no separate sites inventory is required for extremely low income housing needs.

Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 4
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7261007028 0.2 223 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.22 38% 0 Commercial Store 1600 1/2

CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7209008012 0.13 249 0.26 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 9 N/A Market 0.32 43% 2 Residential Duplex 342 1/2 E 19TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7281019021 0.03 494 0.32 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 4 0 0 4 Planned Development PD-30 150 5 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 417 1/4 E 1ST ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7275001083 0.52 507 0.83 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 73 7 0 66 Planned Development PD-30 150 78 Market Market 0.01 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
300 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG
BEACH

CA LONG

BEACH CA
7274023024 0.14 328 0.3 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 6 1 0 5 Planned Development PD-30 150 21 Market Market 0.50 39% 1 Residential Single Family 853 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274023022 0.16 328 0.3 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 6 1 0 5 Planned Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.32 29% 1 Residential Single Family 861 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7275002025 0.31 500 0.31 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 43 4 0 39 Planned Development PD-30 150 47 Market Market 0.13 33% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
210 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7274006023 0.3 371 0.3 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 14 0 3 11 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 7 N/A Market 0.82 69% 1 Commercial
Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1217

ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7267005012 0.19 346 0.37 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.43 52% 3 Residential Three Units 1054

ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7268030013 0.15 220 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.67 48% 1 Industrial Light
Manufacturing
1708

ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7268019024 0.46 391 0.46 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 21 0 4 17 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 10 N/A Market 0.50 53% 1 Industrial
Warehousing,
Distribution,
Storage
1480

ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7266005001 0.12 329 0.36 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 17 2 0 15 Planned Development PD-30 150 18 Market Market 0.56 32% 2 Residential Duplex 744 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 5
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7265001037 0.34 498 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 48 5 0 43 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.26 24% 0 Commercial Service Station 200 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7274023018 0.19 327 0.35 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 8 1 0 7 Planned Development PD-30 150 29 Market Market 0.42 64% 7 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
905 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274023016 0.16 327 0.35 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 6 1 0 5 Planned Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.00 1% 0 Residential Four Units, Vacant Land
919 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7266006040 0.14 522 0.53 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 20 2 0 18 Planned Development PD-30 150 21 Market Market 0.45 77% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
638 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7268019018 0.13 392 0.38 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.23 48% 1 Commercial
Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1404

ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7267005010 0.18 346 0.37 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.29 26% 1 Residential Single Family 1060

ALAMITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7266015016 0.16 527 0.31 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.21 29% 1 Residential Single Family 468 ALMOND AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7148013035 0.14 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 3385

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7274013032 0.47 352 0.75 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 47 47 0 0 Commercial CO 22 10 N/A Market 0.06 35% 5 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1078

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH

CA LONG

BEACH CA
7274001018 0.18 358 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 9% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1225

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274015041 0.18 339 0.79 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 937 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7130022041 0.65 96 0.65 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 28 28 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 10% 1 Commercial Restaurant,
Cocktail Lounge,
Fast Food-Auto
Oriented
5146

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 6
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7115002004 0.78 622 0.78 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 54 54 0 0 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.17 17% 1 Commercial Service Station,
Car Wash,
Convenience
Store
6685

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7115026038 0.6 630 0.6 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 35% 7 Commercial Store 6580

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7211001006 0.15 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 23 23 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.64 30% 0 Residential Single Family 2546

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7135013053 3.28 104 3.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 226 226 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.76 36% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
4570

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7208006057 0.11 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 17 17 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2545

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7281007028 0.23 513 0.52 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 32 3 0 29 Planned Development PD-30 150 35 Market Market 0.91 32% 0 Commercial Store 401 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7138017022 0.31 48 0.88 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 12 12 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 35% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3900

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7274013030 0.28 352 0.75 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 28 28 0 0 Commercial CO 22 6 N/A Market 0.25 48% 1 Commercial Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
1066

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274016007 0.17 334 0.51 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.22 42% 1 Residential Single Family 847 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7210016904 0.34 241 0.57 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 34 34 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 31% 0 Commercial Store 1858

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7269031021 0.16 395 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 12 0 2 10 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.81 67% 1 Commercial Small Food
Store, Less Than
6,000 SF
1473

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7208007008 0.23 117 0.58 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 14 14 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.29 72% 0 Commercial Store 2485

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7130002034 0.72 99 0.95 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 32 32 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.25 15% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5361

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 7
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7281007029 0.17 513 0.52 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.72 50% 0 Commercial Office Building 417 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7138030015 0.44 47 0.44 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 13 0 3 10 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.52 17% 2 Commercial Store 3850

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7209004023 0.13 251 0.26 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.30 29% 0 Commercial Office Building 1909

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7138017023 0.29 48 0.88 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 11 11 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.62 54% 1 Commercial Store 3908

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7209004022 0.13 251 0.26 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.82 70% 1 Commercial
Office Building,
Office And
Residential
1901

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7139001018 0.54 111 0.54 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 20 20 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.09 21% 0 Commercial Service Station 4385

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7208007026 0.26 116 0.26 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 12 0 2 10 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.62 47% 0 Commercial Professional Building
2403

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7139002030 0.28 114 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.72 30% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
4101

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7139003002 0.19 51 0.93 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 7 7 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.51 55% 0 Commercial Store 4019

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7269031017 0.16 396 0.29 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 12 0 2 10 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.00 25% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1491

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7145019014 0.5 34 1.16 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 34 34 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.45 10% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3402

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7274015900 0.34 340 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 14 1 0 13 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.00 80% 0 Commercial Office Building 999 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7138031024 0.73 45 0.73 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 27 27 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.65 32% 0 Commercial Bank, Savings & Loan
3804

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7269031018 0.13 396 0.29 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.87 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1487

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 8
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7148013038 0.54 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 37 37 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.14 36% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3301

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7116018023 0.6 676 0.6 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
6935

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7127006036 0.29 652 0.29 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.08 31% 0 Commercial Service Station 5738

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7130006043 0.33 98 0.33 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 5205

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7210016027 0.23 241 0.57 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 23 23 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.92 66% 0 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
1870

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7139004004 0.38 46 0.38 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.53 49% 0 Commercial Store 3839

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7211001005 0.14 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 21 21 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.39 39% 1 Residential Single Family 2556

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7138017019 0.28 48 0.88 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 11 11 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 50% 0 Commercial Store 3918

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7274016008 0.17 334 0.51 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.45 18% 1 Residential Single Family 835 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7209006022 0.13 244 0.48 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.09 64% 0 Residential Duplex 1825

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7148013036 0.16 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.10 40% 0 Commercial Office Building 3355

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7210009027 0.14 250 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 0 2 8 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1934

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7139003003 0.37 51 0.93 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 14 14 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.84 58% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
4001

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7139003004 0.37 51 0.93 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 14 14 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 53% 0 Institutional School (Private) 3981

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 9
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7130010017 1.07 95 1.63 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 47 47 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.69 47% 0 Commercial Store 5117

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7208006060 0.11 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 17 17 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2525

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7124017032 0.32 660 0.64 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 12 12 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.81 19% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5990

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7269031020 0.14 395 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 0 2 8 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.78 31% 1 Residential Single Family 1475

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7125034033 0.21 654 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 5927

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7281006010 0.46 512 0.46 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 64 6 0 58 Planned Development PD-30 150 69 Market Market 0.07 20% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
402 ATLANTIC
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7139002031 1.68 113 1.68 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 63 63 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 36% 0 Commercial Store 4215

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7115027012 2.54 631 2.54 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 175 175 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 33% 5 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
6597

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7274015043 0.18 339 0.79 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 919 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7281002002 0.34 517 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 48 5 0 43 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.54 23% 0 Commercial Restaurant,
Cocktail Lounge,
Fast Food-Auto
Oriented
555 ATLANTIC
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7124001025 0.4 637 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 15 15 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 6108

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7139001030 0.56 112 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 21 21 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.55 40% 0 Commercial Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
4335

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7130010018 0.56 95 1.63 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 25 25 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.47 36% 0 Commercial Wireless
Communication
Tower, Single
Story
5115

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 10
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7124017031 0.21 660 0.64 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 8 8 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.45 37% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
5966

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7124001021 0.12 635 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 57% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
6176

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7138016036 0.74 50 0.74 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 28 28 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.58 37% 6 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
4040

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7274017014 0.11 331 0.28 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 4 0 0 4 Planned Development PD-30 150 17 Market Market 0.11 66% 0 Institutional School (Private) 753 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7148013034 0.41 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 28 28 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 43% 0 Commercial Store 3395

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7208006058 0.11 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 17 17 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2535

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7139001900 0.19 112 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 7 7 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 6% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
4325

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7269032906 0.55 398 0.55 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 55 55 0 0 Institutional I 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 14% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1535

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274016035 0.17 334 0.51 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.90 63% 0 Commercial Office Building 853 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7125034032 0.11 654 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 3 0 1 2 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 2% 0 Residential Vacant Land 5941

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7274013008 0.14 341 0.28 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 0 2 8 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.19 62% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1036

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7124017033 0.11 660 0.64 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 4 4 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 2% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 5960

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7274018049 0.34 520 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 48 5 0 43 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.33 37% 0 Institutional Mortuary, Funeral Home
638 ATLANTIC
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 11
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7130025031 0.4 101 0.4 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.88 47% 0 Institutional School (Private) 5350

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7274017030 0.17 330 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.70 44% 3 Residential Duplex 728 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7211001004 0.15 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 23 23 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2560

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7274017015 0.17 331 0.28 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.52 45% 0 Commercial Office Building 741 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7210009011 0.28 250 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 20 0 4 16 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 60% 0 Commercial Professional Building
1954

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7127020012 0.46 646 0.72 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 20 20 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.25 22% 0 Commercial Auto Service
Centers, No
Gasoline
5400

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7208006061 0.1 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 15 15 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2515

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7148012033 0.26 33 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.13 29% 1 Commercial Service Station 3390

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7148013037 0.36 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 25 25 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.17 42% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3333

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7125035032 0.35 661 0.35 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 42% 2 Commercial Store 6001

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7127009005 0.2 648 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 6 0 1 5 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.39 47% 2 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
5574

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7127009035 0.1 648 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 3 0 1 2 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 5564

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7208007027 0.35 117 0.58 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 22 22 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.48 26% 0 Commercial Store 2467

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 12
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7124001024 0.35 637 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 13 13 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.14 16% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
6142

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7274017028 0.17 330 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.28 27% 1 Residential Single Family 740 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7124001022 0.25 635 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.52 23% 0 Commercial Store 6184

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7148013033 0.59 26 1.18 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
3301

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7211001003 0.29 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 44 44 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.73 49% 0 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
2572

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7210016028 0.11 241 0.8 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 11 11 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 5% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
1884

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7210016029 0.12 241 0.8 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 12 12 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
1890

ATLANTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7313033018 0.16 144 0.43 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.82 24% 1 Residential Single Family 2629 BALTIC AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90810
7254008023 0.14 304 0.41 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.84 45% 1 Residential Single Family 1067

BELMONT AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7254008022 0.14 304 0.41 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.25 19% 1 Residential Single Family 1065

BELMONT AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7269036024 0.17 196 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.52 27% 2 Residential Duplex 1709 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269001031 0.18 192 0.92 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 11 11 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.02 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1724 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269042020 0.14 431 0.28 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 3 N/A Market 0.55 41% 2 Residential Duplex 1335 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 13
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269042019 0.14 431 0.28 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 3 N/A Market 0.50 37% 2 Residential Duplex 1339 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269036003 0.17 195 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.25 21% 1 Residential Single Family 1777 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7205003004 0.15 131 0.54 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 6 6 0 0 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.16 14% 1 Residential Single Family 2575 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7269001032 0.18 192 0.92 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 11 11 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.02 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1720 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269001030 0.18 192 0.92 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 11 11 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.02 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1726 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269036023 0.17 196 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.25 18% 1 Residential Single Family 1719 CEDAR AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7268027027 0.12 218 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.28 38% 1 Residential Single Family 1736

CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7275005004 0.13 505 0.27 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.27 52% 1 Residential Single Family 332 CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7265003011 0.12 488 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.47 31% 1 Residential Single Family 27 CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7268027005 0.15 214 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.53 44% 2 Residential Duplex 1776

CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7275005005 0.14 505 0.27 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.98 49% 2 Residential Duplex 326 CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7268027002 0.15 214 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.57 75% 0 Commercial Store 1782

CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7268027013 0.15 218 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.77 28% 1 Residential Single Family 1742

CERRITOS AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7147026017 0.9 25 0.9 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 34 34 0 0 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 5 N/A Market 0.31 50% 0 Commercial
Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3431 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH
LO 0
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 14
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7129030016 0.512114 680 0.512114 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 5 0 0 5 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 30% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5003 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7261005007 0.31 221 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 15 0 3 12 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.28 19% 1 Residential Single Family 1701 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7128032019 0.14 644 0.38 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.73 55% 1 Commercial Store 5449 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7216032025 0.13 238 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.29 30% 1 Residential Single Family 1845 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7114020037 0.14 634 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.12 12% 1 Commercial Store 6395 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7262024012 0.15 326 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 35% 1 Residential Single Family, Spa
754 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7261032008 0.15 374 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.36 49% 2 Residential Duplex 1132 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7261017025 0.14 388 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.67 29% 1 Residential Single Family 1437 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7114020039 0.15 634 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.31 36% 1 Residential Single Family 6377 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7114018052 0.52 632 0.52 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 20 20 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 47% 1 Institutional Church 6465 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7123013042 0.33 659 0.33 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.54 24% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5925 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7261032007 0.15 374 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.11 38% 1 Residential Single Family 1134 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7261008024 0.14 389 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.59 32% 1 Residential Single Family 1505 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7116006047 0.25 678 1.19 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 17 17 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.36 34% 1 Residential Single Family 6821 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 15
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7152001016 3.7 94 4.2 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 254 254 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.49 33% 0 Commercial Store 4700 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7261008020 0.14 222 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.41 22% 1 Residential Single Family 1535 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7275019030 0.23 490 0.35 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 10 0 2 8 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 3 N/A Market 0.57 58% 0 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
245 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7157015017 0.96 643 20.77 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 48 0 10 38 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.36 10% 1 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
5540 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7119014035 0.46 639 0.46 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 14 0 3 11 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.24 26% 1 Industrial Light Manufacturing
6242 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7267015015 0.15 322 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 935 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7267014019 0.15 323 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.59 26% 1 Residential Single Family 1035 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7128031001 0.12 645 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.46 33% 0 Commercial Store 5519 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7263007001 0.14 492 0.33 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.52 51% 2 Residential Duplex, Pool 294 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7157015025 10.21 643 20.77 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 511 0 103 408 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.78 27% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
5450 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7128032001 0.24 644 0.38 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 12 0 2 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 70% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
5465 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7261007029 0.2 223 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.07 34% 0 Industrial Light Manufacturing
1600 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7216032023 0.13 238 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.62 59% 1 Commercial Store 1835 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7119018900 0.41 658 0.93 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 28 28 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 58% 0 Commercial Office Building, 2 Stories
5898 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 16
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7261017031 0.14 387 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.44 52% 1 Commercial Store 1403 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7261017030 0.14 387 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.36 66% 0 Commercial Store 1409 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7116007053 0.4 621 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 20 0 4 16 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 17% 1 Commercial Store 6701 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7261017024 0.14 388 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.79 68% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1441 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7262008020 0.13 324 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 1 N/A Market 0.25 23% 1 Residential Single Family 1040 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7116006048 0.59 678 1.19 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.41 46% 1 Industrial Warehousing,
Distribution,
10,000 to 24,999
SF
6825 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7116006046 0.35 678 1.19 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 24 24 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.41 13% 1 Residential Single Family 6819 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7118013004 0.26 638 0.26 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.75 17% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
6193 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7267014018 0.15 323 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.44 42% 2 Residential Duplex 1043 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7262024010 0.15 326 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.36 48% 2 Residential Duplex 760 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7128031030 0.31 645 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 15 0 3 12 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.79 61% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
5531 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7129003029 0.52 102 0.52 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 36 36 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.33 31% 1 Commercial Store 5365 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7262008021 0.13 324 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 1 N/A Market 0.30 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1048 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 17
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7119001004 0.34 633 0.34 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 47% 0 Commercial Office Building 6510 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7261017026 0.14 388 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.06 9% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
1433 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7261008023 0.14 389 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.34 40% 1 Residential Single Family 1519 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7129010028 0.249913 679 0.249913 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Residential R-4-N 22 5 N/A Market 0.31 27% 1 Industrial Open Storage,
Contractor
Storage Yard
5229 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7137012011 0.511414 681 0.511414 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 6 0 0 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 1.94 21% 0 Institutional Church 4103 CHERRY AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7137013006 0.643798 684 0.643798 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 9 0 0 9 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.57 12% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
4001 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7137025027 0.29791 686 0.29791 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Residential R-1-N 5 2 N/A Market 0.04 29% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3801 CHERRY
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7269038026 0.17 197 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.82 31% 2 Residential Duplex 1607

CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7206026010 0.15 130 0.46 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.69 38% 1 Residential Single Family 2620

CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7269039010 0.86 403 0.86 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 54 54 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 19 N/A Market 0.84 23% 1 Institutional Homes For Aged & Others
1548

CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7280012005 0.24 479 0.48 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 36 Market Market 0.22 33% 10 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
445 CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7269038025 0.17 197 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.48 30% 2 Residential Duplex 1615

CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7280012007 0.24 479 0.48 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 36 Market Market 0.00 10% 0 Residential Four Units, Vacant Land
437 CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 18
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7180020003 0.359049 704 0.359049 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 4 0 0 4 Residential R-1-N 5 2 N/A Market 2.95 21% 1 Residential Single Family 4344 CLARK AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90808
7258022028 0.18 565 0.67 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 8 8 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.27 43% 2 Residential Duplex 720

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7257013004 0.15 549 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 40% 1 Residential Single Family 391

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7258022006 0.15 315 0.3 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.14 29% 1 Residential Single Family 776

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7258028005 0.17 563 1.02 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 7 7 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 3 N/A Market 0.31 42% 2 Residential Duplex 675

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7120016032 0.15 617 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.67 44% 1 Residential Single Family 6681

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7257019014 0.15 581 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.26 34% 1 Residential Single Family 324

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7257013007 0.15 549 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.56 50% 1 Residential Duplex 387

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7257014012 0.15 548 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.71 43% 1 Residential Single Family 374

CORONADO
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7262027016 0.33 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 23 23 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.38 4% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
600 DAWSON
AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7262027003 0.14 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.47 4% 0 Residential Duplex 620 DAWSON AVE
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7273007023 0.18 443 0.36 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 31 3 0 28 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.03 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 233 E 10TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7258001025 0.3 317 0.3 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 3 N/A Market 0.95 58% 0 Institutional Church 2841 E 10TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7274022001 0.26 344 0.26 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 39 Market Market 0.02 42% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
900 E 10TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 19
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7254017013 1.77 308 1.77 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 66 66 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 19 N/A Market 0.55 15% 0 Commercial Nursery Or Greenhouse
3842 E 10TH
ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7274023008 0.17 343 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.00 2% 0 Residential Four Units, Vacant Land
1020 E 10TH
ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274023007 0.17 343 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.25 28% 1 Residential Single Family 1028 E 10TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7273007038 0.12 444 0.27 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 20 2 0 18 Planned Development PD-30 150 18 Market Market 0.43 64% 6 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
201 E 10TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7273011002 0.17 449 0.46 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 29 3 0 26 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 42% 5 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
322 E 10TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7273007024 0.18 443 0.36 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 31 3 0 28 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.92 47% 4 Residential Four Units 223 E 10TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7267015014 0.15 322 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.16 29% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1942 E 10TH
ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7241012140 0.69 305 0.82 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 26 26 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 8 N/A Market 0.56 27% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
4313 E 10TH
ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7274007013 0.16 348 0.32 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.44 60% 2 Residential Duplex 1027 E 11TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7274007037 0.16 348 0.32 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.44 59% 2 Residential Duplex 1019 E 11TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269030014 0.28 361 0.44 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 20 0 4 16 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 3 N/A Market 0.42 30% 1 Residential Single Family 505 E 14TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7259006048 0.15 272 0.31 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.38 44% 2 Residential Duplex 3515 E 15TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7259006047 0.16 272 0.31 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.90 49% 2 Residential Duplex 3507 E 15TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 20
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269022016 0.14 204 0.28 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.31 35% 1 Residential Single Family 415 E 16TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269022018 0.14 204 0.28 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.48 45% 1 Residential Single Family 419 E 16TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269021014 0.15 205 0.3 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.25 19% 1 Residential Single Family 345 E 17TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7268030016 0.15 220 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.87 19% 1 Residential Single Family 1225 E 17TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7269021042 0.15 205 0.3 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.25 34% 1 Residential Single Family 351 E 17TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90813
7209008010 0.13 249 0.26 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 9 N/A Market 0.65 33% 2 Residential Duplex 340 E 19TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7216012001 0.57 239 0.57 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 39 39 0 0 Planned
Development PD-22 40 23 N/A Affordable 0.33 50% 0 Industrial Warehousing,
Distribution,
Storage
1851 E 19TH
ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7281019019 0.2 494 0.32 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 28 3 0 25 Planned Development PD-30 150 30 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 401 E 1ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7265003008 0.19 488 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 4 N/A Market 0.44 40% 2 Residential Duplex 1054 E 1ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7256003004 0.13 602 0.39 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 56% 1 Residential Single Family 3712 E 1ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90803
7256003003 0.13 602 0.39 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 63% 1 Residential Single Family 3702 E 1ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90803
7281019020 0.09 494 0.32 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 13 1 0 12 Planned Development PD-30 150 14 Market Market 0.00 7% 0 Residential Vacant Land 417 E 1ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7209010006 0.14 253 0.28 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.68 42% 1 Residential Single Family 344 E 20TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7209010007 0.14 253 0.28 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 408 E 20TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 21
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7208005019 0.12 119 0.36 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.37 42% 1 Residential Single Family 544 E 25TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7208002010 0.15 155 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 11 0 2 9 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.65 37% 1 Residential Single Family 233 E 25TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7208002008 0.15 155 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 11 0 2 9 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.28 32% 1 Residential Single Family 227 E 25TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7208005018 0.12 119 0.36 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.54 46% 1 Residential Single Family 540 E 25TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7208005020 0.12 119 0.36 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.76 25% 1 Residential Single Family 550 E 25TH WAY
LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7206023012 0.15 24 0.31 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.16 38% 1 Residential Single Family 204 E 29TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7206023011 0.16 24 0.31 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 12 1 0 11 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.52 34% 1 Residential Single Family 162 E 29TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90806
7243013035 0.28 597 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.39 39% 0 Commercial Store 5700 E 2ND ST LONG

BEACH CA
90803
7265020025 0.12 489 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.32 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1821 E 2ND ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7265020028 0.12 489 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 42% 1 Residential Single Family 1831 E 2ND ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7206010009 0.14 17 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.55 47% 1 Residential Single Family 114 E 31ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7206011013 0.14 14 0.28 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.62 40% 1 Residential Single Family 222 E 31ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7206010010 0.14 17 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.46 37% 1 Residential Single Family 116 E 31ST ST LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7206010008 0.14 17 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.57 49% 2 Residential Duplex 112 E 31ST ST 000B
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 22
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7206011014 0.14 14 0.28 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.47 40% 2 Residential Duplex 226 E 31ST ST A
LONG

BEACH CA
90807
7263007004 0.19 492 0.33 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.43 44% 2 Residential Duplex 2016 E 3RD ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7280017009 0.17 473 1.92 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 29 29 0 0 Planned
Development PD-30 150 26 Affordable Affordable 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 119 E 3RD ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7255002007 0.3 552 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.67 27% 1 Commercial Service Station, Self Service 3601 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7263020010 0.15 536 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 2429 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7263020009 0.15 536 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 39% 1 Residential Single Family 2425 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7255037028 0.29 575 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.98 33% 2 Commercial Store 4337 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7255014001 0.12 578 0.36 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.01 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 3800 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7266008015 0.42 508 0.54 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 59 6 0 53 Planned Development PD-30 150 63 Market Market 0.20 35% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
901 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7257008015 0.15 557 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.86 36% 1 Commercial Store 2805 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7263023024 0.27 556 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.65 43% 0 Commercial Store 2741 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7257008023 0.15 555 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 26% 1 Residential Single Family 2919 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7275016050 0.4 539 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 12 0 2 10 Commercial CNR 11 4 N/A Market 0.10 68% 0 Commercial Store 1800 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7275001021 0.26 506 0.26 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 36 4 0 32 Planned Development PD-30 150 39 Market Market 0.05 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 1030 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 23
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7257008022 0.15 555 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.80 51% 1 Residential Single Family, Over 20 Stories 2909 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7257016027 0.48 545 0.63 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 18 18 0 0 Institutional I 0 0 N/A Market 0.77 40% 1 Commercial Office Building 3540 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90803
7266026045 0.44 537 0.44 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 13 0 3 10 Commercial CNR 11 5 N/A Market 0.57 37% 4 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
1949 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7275001002 0.24 507 0.83 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 34 3 0 31 Planned Development PD-30 150 36 Market Market 0.52 28% 0 Commercial Miscellaneous commercial 912 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7255003007 0.14 544 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 3646 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7266008021 0.16 509 0.33 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 22 2 0 20 Planned Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.06 93% 1 Commercial Service/Repair Shop, Laundry 965 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7257008016 0.15 557 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 2811 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7255003006 0.14 544 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.08 40% 1 Residential Single Family 3640 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7255003021 0.14 543 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.15 26% 1 Residential Single Family 3708 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7257005019 0.15 554 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.81 36% 1 Residential Single Family 3027 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7255036013 0.16 576 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.89 48% 1 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
4240 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7281011001 0.23 511 0.36 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 32 3 0 29 Planned Development PD-30 150 35 Market Market 0.01 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 600 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7263004001 0.37 540 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.21 18% 0 Institutional School (Private) 2000 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7266015023 0.19 538 0.31 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.60 18% 2 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
1327 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 24
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7255003020 0.14 543 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.30 51% 1 Residential Single Family 3714 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7255036015 0.16 576 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.12 23% 1 Residential Single Family 4300 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7266015024 0.12 538 0.31 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.01 10% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 1337 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7257005018 0.15 554 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.13 34% 1 Residential Single Family 3017 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7266008022 0.17 509 0.33 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.93 64% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge 975 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7275001001 0.07 507 0.83 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 11 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 900 E 4TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7255015017 0.15 577 0.27 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.24 20% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
3932 E 4TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90814
7281002041 0.17 515 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.00 0% 1 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 437 E 5TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7281002010 0.17 516 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.40 26% 1 Residential Single Family 523 E 5TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7266007026 0.15 526 0.28 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 21 2 0 19 Planned Development PD-30 150 23 Market Market 0.31 53% 5 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
1001 E 5TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7266007027 0.13 526 0.28 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 18 2 0 16 Planned Development PD-30 150 20 Market Market 0.94 48% 4 Residential Four Units 1011 E 5TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7281002009 0.17 516 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.86 51% 7 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
509 E 5TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7281002024 0.17 515 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.46 55% 5 Commercial Office Building,
Office And
Residential
425 E 5TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7281005003 0.28 510 0.28 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 39 4 0 35 Planned Development PD-30 150 42 Market Market 0.08 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 832 E 5TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 25
January 2022
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7121014001 0.25 640 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2800 E 63RD
ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7115002006 0.14 623 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.41 43% 1 Residential Single Family 570 E 67TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7115002009 0.16 623 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.85 61% 2 Residential Duplex 590 E 67TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7120016030 0.15 617 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.88 41% 1 Residential Single Family 3240 E 67TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7120016031 0.14 617 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.77 50% 1 Residential Single Family 3230 E 67TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90805
7266007008 0.15 525 0.3 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 21 2 0 19 Planned Development PD-30 150 23 Market Market 0.19 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1028 E 6TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7274018039 0.17 521 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 70% 6 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
625 E 6TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7274018040 0.17 521 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 50% 3 Residential Three Units 633 E 6TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7266007007 0.15 525 0.3 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 21 2 0 19 Planned Development PD-30 150 23 Market Market 0.43 67% 4 Residential Four Units 1036 E 6TH ST LONG

BEACH CA
90802
7273020039 0.17 459 0.34 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 29 3 0 26 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 325 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH
LO 0
7262027002 0.16 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.45 4% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 2212 E 7TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7262021011 0.27 535 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.20 17% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
2337 E 7TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
7241015031 0.3 571 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.94 45% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
4400 E 7TH ST
LONG

BEACH CA
90804
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 26
January 2022
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7254021013 0.14 569 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.48 34% 1 Residential Single Family 4017 E 7TH ST LONG