06062023-H-22sr&att — Long Beach City Council, June 6, 2023 (part 2 of 5)

Table B

BACKGROUND NOISE CORRECTION
Difference between total noise and background
noise alone (decibels)
6—8 1
9—10 .5
Amount to be subtracted from
(Remove Existing Noise District Map and Insert Proposed Noise District Map below) Proposed Noise Ordinance Redline
10/19/2021

Page 3 of 4 ends

8.80.170-Interior noise limits-Maximum sSound levels.

A. The interior noise standards for various land use districts as presented in Table C shall apply, unless otherwise specifically indicated, within structures located in designated zones with windows in their normal seasonal configuration.

TABLE C
Receiving Land
Use District
Type of
Land Use Time Interval
Allowable
Interior
Noise Level
(dBA)
10:00 p.m.—7:00
All Residential a.m.
7:00 a.m.—10:00
35 45
p.m.
10:00 p.m. -7:00
All Mixed-use
a.m.
7:00 a.m.-10:00
45 50
p.m.

All
School
7:00 a.m.—10:00
p.m.
(While school is in
session)
45 Hospital, designated quiet zones and
noise sensitive zones
Any time 40
B. No person shall operate, or cause to be operated, any source of sound indoors at any location within the incorporated limits of the City or allow the creation of any indoor noise which causes the noise level when measured inside the receiving dwelling unit to exceed:

1. The noise standard for that land use district as specified in Table C for a cumulative period of more than five (5) minutes in any hour; or

2. The noise standard plus five decibels (5 dB) for a cumulative period of more than one (1) minute in any hour; or
Proposed Noise Ordinance Redline
10/19/2021

Page 4 of 4 ends

3. The noise standard plus ten decibels (10 dB) or the maximum measured ambient, for any period of time.

8.80.030 - Administration and enforcement.

The noise control program established by this Chapter shall be administered by the noise control office as designated by the City Manager. An official within the noise control office shall be appointed as the Noise Control Officer and shall be a person with sufficient knowledge of environmental acoustics to enforce noise regulations. All departments with noise regulation responsibilities may, based on circumstance and need, carry out the duties of the Noise Control Officer to help ensure that noise complaints from the public are timely and adequately addressed. This includes but is not limited to taking noise measurements and acting as a case manager, upon receiving a noise complaint; coordinating with the Noise Control Officer and relevant departments as appropriate based on the circumstance; and conducting other actions necessary to facilitate resolution of the noise complaint. Further, the City is committed to annually reviewing the provisions of this ordinance.

General Plan NOISE ELEMENT UPDATE

EXISTING CONDITIONS
REPORT
Attachment D
This page intentionally left blank.

Existing Conditions Report
for the City of Long Beach Noise Element
Submitted to:

City of Long Beach
Development Services Department, Planning Bureau
333 West Ocean Boulevard
Long Beach, CA 90802
Prepared by:

LSA
20 Executive Park
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 553-0666
Project No. RDG1701
RRM Design Group
32332 Camino Capistrano, Ste. 205
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
(949) 361-7950
This page intentionally left blank.

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction, Setting, and Fundamentals of Noise

1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................................1-1

1.2 Physical Setting..........................................................................................................................................................................................................1-2

1.3 Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration ...............................................................................................................................................................1-3

1.4 Existing Noise Sources...........................................................................................................................................................................................1-10

1.5 Existing Vibration Sources....................................................................................................................................................................................1-16

1.6 Community Engagement (Summary in Progress)........................................................................................................................................1-18

2.0 Existing Regulatory Setting

2.1 Federal Regulations..................................................................................................................................................................................................2-1

2.3 City of Long Beach..................................................................................................................................................................................................2-10

3.0 Existing Noise Analysis

3.1 Existing Noise Monitoring Results......................................................................................................................................................................3-1

3.2 Existing Traffic Noise Contours.............................................................................................................................................................................3-1

3.3 Existing Airport Noise Contours.........................................................................................................................................................................3-34

3.4 Existing Noise and Land Use Compatibility Discussion ............................................................................................................................3-34

3.5 References..................................................................................................................................................................................................................3-36 Appendix A- Traffic Data
Figures and Tables

FIGURES
Figure 1 – Existing Major Noise Sources.............................................................................................................................................................................1-11 Figure 2 – Noise Monitoring Locations................................................................................................................................................................................3-10 Figure 3 – Existing Traffic Noise Contours..........................................................................................................................................................................3-14 Figure 4 – Existing Long Beach Airport Noise Contours...............................................................................................................................................3-35 TABLES
Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms...............................................................................................................................................................................1-5 Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources..............................................................................................................................................1-5 Table C: Human Response to Different Levels of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration.........................................................................................1-6 Table D: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria..............................................................................................................................................................2-1 Table E: California Office of Noise Control Land Use Compatibility Matrix for Community Noise Exposure 2-5 Table F: City General Plan Recommended Criteria for Maximum Acceptable Noise Levels1 in A-Weighted Decibels (dBA) 2-10 Table G: Maximum Local Noise Criteria...............................................................................................................................................................................2-11 Table H: Interior Noise Limits..................................................................................................................................................................................................2-12 Table I: Existing Long-Term 48-Hour Noise Level Measurements................................................................................................................................3-2 Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements................................................................................................................................................3-4 This page intentionally left blank.

AELUP Airport Environs Land Use Plans
AICUZ Air Installation Compatible Land Use Zone
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials International CCR California Code of Regulations
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Long Beach
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
dB decibels
dBA A-weighted decibels
g Vibration unit equal to 9.81 m/s2
I-405 Interstate 405
I-605 Interstate 605
I-710 Interstate 710
IIC Impact Isolation Class
L10 noise level exceeded 10 percent of the time during a stated period L50 median noise level
L90 the noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time
Ldn day-night average level
L
eq equivalent continuous sound level
Lmax maximum noise level
Metro Los Angeles Country Metropolitan Transportation Authority mph miles per hour
OITC Outdoor-Indoor Sound Transmission Class
PPV peak particle velocity
RMS root-mean-square
SENEL Single Event Noise Equivalent Level
SR-1 State Route 1 or Pacific Coast Highway
SR-103 State Route 103
SR-22 State Route 22
SR-91 State Route 91
State State of California
STC Sound Transmission Class
VdB vibration velocity decibels
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
This page intentionally left blank.
1 Introduction, Setting,
and Fundamentals of
Noise
1 Introduction, Setting,
and Fundamentals of
Noise
» 1.1 Introduction.................................................................. 1-1 » 1.2 Physical Setting............................................................. 1-1 » 1.3 Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration....................... 1-3

1.3.1 Characteristics of Sound ...................................................... 1-3

1.3.2 Measurement of Sound........................................................ 1-4

1.3.3 Physiological Effects of Noise ............................................. 1-6

1.3.4 Fundamentals of Ground-borne Vibration ....................... 1-9 » 1.4 Existing Noise Sources................................................ 1-10

1.4.1 Sources .................................................................................. 1-10

1.4.2 Traffic Noise.......................................................................... 1-10

1.4.3 Rail Noise............................................................................... 1-12

1.4.4 Aircraft Noise ........................................................................ 1-13

1.4.5 Watercraft Noise................................................................... 1-14

1.4.6 Port of Long Beach............................................................... 1-14

1.4.7 Special Events Noise ............................................................ 1-14

1.4.8 Stationary Noise Sources .................................................... 1-15

1.4.9 Nuisance Noise..................................................................... 1-15 » 1.5 Existing Vibration Sources.......................................... 1-16

1.5.1 Vibration Sources ................................................................. 1-16

1.5.2 Construction Activity Vibration........................................... 1-16

1.5.3 Rail Activity Related Vibration............................................. 1-17

1.5.4 Heavy Vehicles and Buses................................................... 1-17

1.5.5 Other Sources of Vibration Annoyance............................. 1-17 » 1.6 Community Engagement ............................................ 1-18 Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-1 1 Draft - February 2018

1.0 Introduction, Setting, and
Fundamentals of Noise

1.1 Introduction
Due to potential impacts associated with elevated
noise and vibration impacts and the effects on
citizens within its cities, the California legislature in 1972 mandated that a noise element be included as
part of city and county general plans. The current
State of California General Plan Guidelines provides
the specific requirements for a noise element (2003).

The Noise Element is a mandatory element of the City
of Long Beach General Plan, and sets forth policies
regarding noise and land use throughout the City.

The Noise Element was last updated in 1975, and was
implemented through a 1977 noise ordinance. Since
that time, the City’s physical makeup, population,
regional context, and the regulatory guidance
around noise have changed significantly.

This Existing Conditions Report discusses the
fundamental concepts of noise, provides a
comprehensive summary of noise in the City that will
inform the future Noise Element vision, goals and
policies, as they relate to the entirety of the General Plan Update, including the Land Use Element and
provides a summary of the existing regulations and
current General Plan Noise Element.

The Noise Element does the following:

Discusses noise characteristics and
documents the existing and potential
future noise environment for those in
the community,
Provides standards and references for
various public and private development
projects, as required by law,
Establishes uniformity of policy and
direction within the City concerning
actions to minimize or eliminate
noise pollution and to make decisions
regarding proposals that may have an
impact on the City’s noise environment,
Serves as an official guide to City
decision-makers and departments,
individual citizens, businesses, and
private organizations concerned with
noise pollution in the City, and
Provides policies and goals the decisionmakers can enforce in order to maintain a desirable environment as it relates
to noise and vibration on a day-to-day
basis.
1-2
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.2 Physical Setting
The City of Long Beach is located approximately
24 miles south of the City of Los Angeles in Los
Angeles County, California. The City is surrounded
by neighboring cities including Los Angeles,
Carson, Compton, Cypress, Paramount, Bellflower,
Lakewood, Hawaiian Gardens, Los Alamitos, and
Seal Beach. The City is bounded to the south by the
Pacific Ocean. The City of Signal Hill is completely
surrounded by the City. The City is made up of
various community plan areas and neighborhoods,
which are presented on Map LU-4 of the Land Use
Element (City of Long Beach) which is anticipated to
be adopted in 2017. The City is generally bounded
by the major transportation facilities including
Interstate 605 (I-605), Interstate 710 (I-710), and
State Route 91 (SR-91), and is bisected by State Route
22 and Interstate 405 (I-405). Additionally, the Port of Long Beach is located in the southwestern corner of
the City and the Long Beach Airport is located in the
northcentral portion of the City.
110
110
105
710
710
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Signal Hill
Cypress
Compton Paramount
Lakewood
Carson
El Segundo
Santa
Monica
San Pedro
Seal Beach
5 5
5 405
10 10
405
405
605
605
101
91 91
Redondo Beach
Huntington Beach
Pacific Ocean
Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-3 1 Draft - February 2018

1.3 Fundamentals of Noise and
Vibration

1.3.1 Characteristics of Sound
Sound is increasing in the environment and can
affect quality of life. Noise is usually defined as
unwanted sound. Noise consists of any sound that
may produce physiological or psychological damage
and/or interfere with communication, work, rest,
recreation, and sleep.

To the human ear, sound has two significant
characteristics: pitch and loudness. Pitch is generally an annoyance, while loudness can affect the ability to
hear. Pitch is the number of complete vibrations (or
cycles per second) of a wave, resulting in the tone’s
range from high to low. Loudness is the strength of
a sound and describes a noisy or quiet environment;
it is measured by the amplitude of the sound wave.

Loudness is determined by the intensity of the sound
waves combined with the reception characteristics of
the human ear. Sound intensity refers to how hard the
sound wave strikes an object, which in turn produces
the sound’s effect. This characteristic of sound can
be precisely measured with instruments. Typically, a
noise analysis defines the noise environment within
a specific area in terms of sound intensity and the
effect on adjacent sensitive land uses.

Pitch
Loudness
1-4
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.3.2 Measurement of Sound
Sound intensity is measured through the A-weighted
scale to correct for the relative frequency response
of the human ear. That is, an A-weighted noise level
de-emphasizes low and very high frequencies of
sound similar to the human ear’s de-emphasis of
these frequencies. Unlike linear units, such as inches
or pounds, decibels are measured on a logarithmic
scale representing points on a sharply rising curve.

For example, 10 decibels (dB) is 10 times more intense
than 1 dB, 20 dB is 100 times more intense, and 30
dB is 1,000 times more intense. Thirty decibels (30
dB) represent 1,000 times as much acoustic energy
as 1 dB. The decibel scale increases as the square
of the change, representing the sound-pressure
energy. A sound as soft as human breathing is about
10 times greater than 0 dB. The decibel system of
measuring sound gives a rough connection between
the physical intensity of sound and its perceived
loudness to the human ear. A 10 dB increase in
sound level is perceived by the human ear as only
a doubling of the loudness of the sound. Ambient
sounds generally range from 30 A-weighted decibels
(dBA) (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud).

Sound levels are generated from a source, and their
decibel level decreases as the distance from that
source increases. Sound dissipates exponentially
with distance from the noise source. For a singlepoint source, sound levels decrease approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the source.

This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated
by stationary equipment. If noise is produced by a line source (e.g., highway traffic or railroad operations)
the sound decreases 3 dB for each doubling of
distance in a hard site environment. Line source
noise in a relatively flat environment with absorptive
vegetation decreases 4.5 dB for each doubling of
distance.

There are many ways to rate noise for various time
periods, but an appropriate rating of ambient noise
affecting humans also accounts for the annoying
effects of sound. Equivalent continuous sound level
(Leq) is the total sound energy of time-varying noise
over a sample period. However, the predominant
rating scales for human communities in the State
of California (State) are the Leq and the Community
Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) or the day-night
average level (Ldn) based on A weighted decibels.

CNEL is the time-varying noise over a 24-hour period,
with a 5 dBA weighting factor applied to the hourly
0 dB
500
1000
30 dB
20 0
Intensity of decibels A-weighted decibels (dBA) of ambient sounds 40 60 80 100
120
140
160
Ambient sounds generally range
from 30 decibels (very quiet) to 100
dBA (very loud)
Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-5 1 Draft - February 2018
L
eq for noises occurring from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
(defined as relaxation hours) and a 10 dBA weighting
factor applied to noise occurring from 10:00 p.m. to
7:00 a.m. (defined as sleeping hours). Ldn is similar
to the CNEL scale but without the adjustment for
events occurring during the evening hours. CNEL
and Ldn are within 1 dBA of each other and are
normally interchangeable. The noise adjustments
are added to the noise events occurring during the
more sensitive hours.

Other noise rating scales of importance, when
assessing the annoyance factor, include the
maximum noise level (Lmax), which is the highest
exponential time-averaged sound level that occurs
during a stated time period. The noise environments
discussed in this analysis are specified in terms of
Lmax for short-term noise impacts. Lmax reflects
peak-operating conditions and addresses the
annoying aspects of intermittent noise.

Another noise scale often used together with the
Lmax in noise ordinances for enforcement purposes
is noise standards in terms of percentile noise levels.

For example, the L10 noise level represents the noise
level exceeded 10 percent of the time during a stated
period. The L50 noise level represents the median
noise level. Half of the time the noise level exceeds
this level, and half of the time it is less than this
level. The L90 noise level represents the noise level
exceeded 90 percent of the time and is considered
the background noise level during a monitoring
period. For a relatively constant noise source, the Leq and L50 are approximately the same.

Noise impacts can be described in three categories.

The first includes audible impacts, which refer to
increases in noise levels noticeable to humans.

Audible increases in noise levels generally refer to
a change of 3 dB or greater, because this level has
been found to be barely perceptible in exterior
environments. The second category, potentially
audible, refers to a change in the noise level between
1 and 3 dB. This range of noise levels has been found
to be noticeable only in laboratory environments.

The last category includes changes in noise level of
less than 1 dB, which are inaudible to the human
ear. Only audible changes in existing ambient or
background noise levels are considered potentially
significant.

Audible impacts:
3 dB or greater
Potentially audible:
1 to 3 dB
Inaudible:
less than 1 dB
What level is audible?
1-6
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.3.3 Physiological Effects of Noise
Physical damage to human hearing begins at
prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than
85 dBA. Exposure to high noise levels affects the
entire system, with prolonged noise exposure in
excess of 75 dBA increasing body tensions and
thereby affecting blood pressure and functions of
the heart and the nervous system. In comparison,
extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA
would result in permanent cell damage. When the
noise level reaches 120 dBA, a tickling sensation
occurs in the human ear, even with short-term
exposure. This level of noise is called the threshold
of feeling. As the sound reaches 140 dBA, the tickling
sensation is replaced by the feeling of pain in the
ear. This is called the threshold of pain. A sound
level of 160 dBA to 165 dBA will potentially result
in dizziness or loss of equilibrium. The ambient or
background noise problem is common and generally
more concentrated in urban areas than in outlying,
less-developed areas.

In addition to the audible effects of noise, research
has shown that prolonged exposure to elevated
noise levels may have other negative health effects.

As presented in Wolfgang Babisch’s Cardiovascular
Effects of Noise, sleep disturbance is considered a
major environmental effect. It is estimated that
80 to 90 percent of the reported cases of sleep
disturbance in noisy environments are for reasons
other than noise originating outdoors. Examples of
sleep disturbance causes include restroom trips;
indoor noises from other occupants; worries; illness;
and climate. Field studies conducted with people in
their normal living situations are scarce.

The primary sleep disturbance effects of noise are:
difficulty in falling asleep (increased sleep latency
time); awakenings; and alterations of sleep stages
or depth, especially a reduction in the proportion
of REM-sleep1. Other physiological effects can be
induced by noise during sleep, including increased
blood pressure; increased heart rate; increased
finger pulse amplitude; vasoconstriction; changes
in respiration; cardiac arrhythmia; and an increase
in body movements. For each of these physiological
effects, both the noise threshold and the noiseresponse relationships may be different. Different noises may also have different information content
and this also could affect physiological threshold and
noise-response relationships.

Exposure to night-time noise also induces secondary
effects, or so-called after effects. These are effects
that can be measured the day following the
night-time exposure, while the individual is awake.

The secondary effects include reduced perceived
sleep quality; increased fatigue; depressed mood or
well-being; and decreased performance.

Long-term effects on psychosocial well-being have
also been related to noise exposure during the night.

Noise annoyance during the night-time increased
the total noise annoyance expressed by people in
the following day. Various studies have also shown
that people living in areas exposed to night-time
noise have an increased use of sedatives or sleeping
pills. Other frequently reported behavioral effects of
night-time noise include closed bedroom windows
and use of personal hearing protection. Sensitive
groups include the elderly, shift workers, persons
especially vulnerable to physical or mental disorders
and other individuals with sleeping difficulties.

Table A lists definitions of acoustical terms and Table Physical damage to human hearing
begins at prolonged exposure to
noise levels higher than 85 dBA.

Extremely Painful
Loud
Very
Loud
Faint Moderate
160 150 140
130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
dBA
Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-7 1 Draft - February 2018
B shows common sound levels and their noise sources.

Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms
Term Definition
Decibel, dB A unit of noise level that denotes the ratio between two quantities that are proportional to power; the number of decibels is 10 times the logarithm (to the base 10) of this ratio.

Frequency, Hz Of a function periodic in time; the number of times that the quantity repeats itself in one second (i.e., number of cycles per second).

A-Weighted Sound Level,
dBA
The sound level obtained by use of A-weighting. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise. (All sound levels in this report are A-weighted, unless reported otherwise.)
L02, L08, L50, L90 The fast A-weighted noise levels that are equaled or exceeded by a fluctuating sound level 2 percent, 8 percent, 50 percent, and 90 percent of a stated time period.

Equivalent Continuous
Noise Level, Leq
The level of a steady sound that, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound.

Community Noise
Equivalent Level, CNEL
The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the addition of 5 dB to sound levels occurring in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and after the addition of 10 dB to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

Day/Night Noise Level,
Ldn
The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the addition of 10 dB to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound levels measured on a sound level meter during a designated time interval using fast-time averaging.

Ambient Noise Level The all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment at a specified time; usually a composite of sound from many sources from many directions, near and far; no particular sound is dominant.

Intrusive The noise that intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, time of occurrence, tonal
or informational content, and the prevailing ambient noise level.

Sound Exposure Level
(SEL)
A measure of the total noise within an event which accounts for duration.

Single Event Noise
Equivalent Level (SENEL)
The sound exposure level for a defined noise threshold level.

Source: Handbook of Acoustical Measurement and Noise Control (Harris 1991). 1-8
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Extremely Painful
Loud
Loud Very
Loud
Quiet Moderately
Loud
Very Faint Faint
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
Noise Environments (dBA)
Near
Jet
Engine
128
64 32
16 8
4 2
Civil
Defense
Siren
Hard Rock Band
Accelerating Motorcycle
Pile Driver, Noisy Urban Street
Ambulance Siren, Food Blender
Vacuum Cleaner
Near Freeway Auto Traffic
Average Office
Light Traffic/Soft Radio Music
Average Residence
Soft
Whisper
Rustling Leaves
Human
Breathing
Subjective Evaluations
Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources
Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-9 1 Draft - February 2018
Table C: Human Response to Different Levels of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration

1.3.4 Fundamentals of Ground-borne
Vibration
Ground vibration consists of rapidly fluctuating
motions or waves with an average motion of zero.

Several methods are typically used to quantify the
amplitude of vibration including peak particle velocity (PPV) and root-mean-square (RMS) velocity. PPV is
defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or
negative peak of the vibration wave. RMS velocity is
defined as the average of the squared amplitude of
the signal. PPV and RMS vibration velocity amplitudes
are used to evaluate human response to vibration.

Low-level vibrations frequently cause irritating
secondary vibration (e.g., a slight rattling of windows, doors, or stacked dishes). The rattling sound can
give rise to exaggerated vibration complaints, even
though there is very little risk of actual structural
damage.

Approximate threshold of
perception for many humans.

Low-frequency sound usually
inaudible; mid-frequency sound
excessive for quiet sleeping areas.

Approximate dividing line between
barely perceptible and distinctly
perceptible. Many people find transit
vibration at this level annoying.

Low-frequency noise acceptable for
sleeping areas; mid-frequency noise
annoying in most quiet occupied
areas.

In high noise environments, which are more
prevalent where ground-borne vibration approaches
perceptible levels, this rattling phenomenon may
also be produced by loud airborne environmental
noise causing induced vibration in exterior doors
and windows.

In urban environments (e.g., City of Long Beach),
sources of ground-borne vibration include
construction activities (specifically pile driving and
blasting), light and heavy rail transit, and heavy
trucks and buses.

Table C displays continuous vibration impacts
on human annoyance. As discussed previously,
annoyance is a subjective measure and vibrations
may be found to be annoying at much lower levels
than those shown, depending on the level of activity
or the sensitivity of the individual. To sensitive
individuals, vibrations approaching the threshold of
perception can be annoying.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
65 75
85 Vibration Velocity Level (VdB)
Noise Level (dBA)
Vibration acceptable
only if there are an
infrequent number
of events per day.

Low-frequecy noise
annoying for sleeping
areas; mid-frequency
noise annoying even for
infrequent events with
institutional land uses
such as schools and
churches.
1-10
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.4 Existing Noise Sources

1.4.1 Sources
Major noise sources in the City include traffic, rail,
aircraft, and stationary sources. The most important
difference between transportation and non
transportation noise sources is that municipalities
can generally exercise control on the level and
duration of noise at the property line of any non
transportation source of noise. Cities can adopt
noise exposure standards for noise levels generated
from mobile sources (e.g., trucks, trains, or planes)
and then make permitting decisions regarding the
sensitivity of land uses in areas with excessive noise.

Cities play a role in enforcing the requirement in
the State vehicle code regarding properly operating
mufflers and also may set speed limits or weight
restrictions on local streets. In general terms, the
City’s actions are primarily proactive with respect to
stationary noise sources versus reactive for mobile
sources. Figure 1 shows the location of the dominant
and major noise sources on a City level.

1.4.2 Traffic Noise
Automobiles, buses, trucks, motorcycles and trains
dominate transportation noise in the City. Traffic
moving along streets and freeways produces a sound
level that remains relatively constant and is part of
the City’s minimum ambient noise level. Vehicular
noise varies depending on the volume, speed and
type of traffic. Slower traffic produces less noise than fast moving traffic. Trucks typically generate more
noise than cars. Infrequent or intermittent noise is
also associated with vehicles, including sirens, vehicle alarms, slamming of doors, garbage and construction
vehicle activity and honking of horns. These noises
add to urban noise and are regulated by a variety
of agencies. Often times, noise from motorcycle
activities are specifically noticed over general traffic noise impacts due acceleration, exposed motor and,
in some cases, lack of or modified mufflers.

Bus service is provided on major streets, collectors,
and local streets within the City’s circulation system.

For the purpose of assessing vehicular noise, three
generic weight classifications are considered (light,
medium, and heavy). At 35 mph, 1 medium duty
truck is as loud as 10 cars, 1 bus is as loud as 20 cars, and 1 heavy truck is as loud as 30 cars. In addition,
noise from traffic sources may be worsened by
grade (inclined roadway) or by the condition of the
pavement.

Major transportation noise sources in the City include
traffic on I-405, I-605, I-710, SR-22, SR-91, State Route 103 (SR-103), Terminal Island Freeway, Pacific Coast
Highway or State Route 1 (SR-1), and Long Beach
Boulevard.

In addition to typical automobiles and medium and
heavy trucks, the City is currently served by Long
Beach Transit, a public transit agency, with bus
service along major roadways in the City through
various routes (i.e., Routes 1, 21, 22, 81, and 192).

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (Metro) operates a limited number of local
and express buses. The Long Beach Transit Gallery
serves as the southern terminus of the Metro Blue
Line and is the main transit hub for bus connections
to various Metro, Long Beach Transit, Los Angeles
Department of Transportation Commuter Express,
and Torrance Transit bus routes.

I-405 Freeway
Ambient freeway noise
is typically 75 dBA or
greater.

Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-11 1 Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
§¨¦710
§¨¦710
§¨¦405
§¨¦405
§¨¦605
ÄÆ91
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingMajorNoiseSources.mxd (10/2/2017) FIGURE 1
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Existing Major Noise Sources
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Long Beach Airport
Port of Long Beach
Industrial Area
Freeway
Metro Blue Line
Freight Line
0 0.75 1.5
MILES
Figure 1: Existing Major Noise Sources
1-12
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.4.3 Rail Noise
The noise impacts associated with rail activities
depend heavily on a number of factors, including the
type of train, the length of train, the physical track
conditions, the geometry and intervening structures
between the rail line and its receptor, the number of
trains operating during the daytime, the number of
trains operating during the nighttime, and the speed
of the train. Additionally, when a horn is required
to sound a warning, which is typical for at-grade
crossings, the noise impact would be greatest at the
land uses closest to the intersection.

Currently, three freight rail lines pass through the
City which are operated by Burlington Northern
Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF) Railway, Union Pacific
Railroad Company (UPRR), and Pacific Harbor
Line Incorporated (PHL). The rail lines run northsouth through the west side of the City, through the northwest corner of the City, around the
neighborhood of North Long Beach.

In addition to freight activities, the Metro Blue Line
which serves as public transit, is part of the Metro
Rail System that runs north-south from Los Angeles
to Long Beach, traveling south via Long Beach
Avenue, Willowbrook Avenue, and Long Beach
Boulevard to its final destination at the Long Beach
Transit Gallery. The Metro Blue Line operates daily,
including all major holidays.

Based on the Federal Railroad Administration
crossing inventories completed between January 1,
2000 and September 17, 2017 conducted at various
crossings in the City, typical operations along the
main rail line included up to 74 trains per day ranging in speed from 5 to 25 mph.

Metro Blue Line
Noise impacts associated
with rail activities depend
heavily on type of train,
the length of train, the
physical track conditions, the
geometry and intervening
structures between the rail
line and its receptor, the
number of trains operating
during the daytime, the
number of trains operating
during the nighttime, and the
speed of the train.

Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-13 1 Draft - February 2018

1.4.4 Aircraft Noise
Aircraft noise within the City is predominately
influenced by operations at the Long Beach Airport
located within the City limits. Operations at the
Long Beach Airport include commercial air carriers,
commuter flights, industrial planes, charter flights,
and other general aviation. Operation at the Long
Beach Airport typically occurs within the daytime
hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., with the exception
of occasional unscheduled landings that occur after
10:00 p.m., and emergency and police helicopter
activities. The Long Beach Airport Community Guide to
Aircraft Noise presents factual information on the City of Long Beach Airport Noise Compatibility Ordinance
(Long Beach Municipal Code Chapter 16.43) and
Long Beach Airport’s efforts to minimize aircraft
noise over nearby neighborhoods. While the City is
not able to control the flight paths, typical operations include approaches from the southeast of the airport
and departures taking off in a northwest direction.

Apart from the restrictions on hours of day, noise
budgets are utilized to limit aircraft activities. Noise budgets do not directly restrict the operation
of a particular aircraft, in contrast to night time
restrictions, but they restrict access by the fleet as a whole. Noise budgets restrict the overall noise during
a certain period of time, which could be seasonally
related or annual.

Currently, the City has implemented a Helicopter
Noise Reduction Study Group that provides members
of the public the opportunity to meet with both City
and Airport staff to discuss issues and concerns
regarding helicopter noise including rotor or “chop”
noise, hovering, and inconsistent flight paths. While
the City cannot directly control the majority of the
operations associated with helicopters, specifically
those related to emergency and police, the City
maintains an interest in helping resolve noise issues
where possible. Members of the communities are
currently participating as a part of the Los Angeles
Area Helicopter Coalition (LAAHNC) and regularly
meet with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
representatives, helicopter operators, and Long
Beach Airport staff in an effort to reduce noise
exposure from helicopter operations.

Long Beach Airport Runway
Long Beach Airport
Apart from the
restrictions on hours of
day, noise budgets are
utilized to limit aircraft
activities.
1-14
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.4.5 Watercraft Noise
Watercraft noise along the southern portion of the
City varies greatly depending on watercraft type,
distance from mainland, and overall control and
use of equipment. While the City does not currently
have any specific criteria related to noise associated
with watercraft, the State of California Department
of Motor Vehicles, as part of its requirements for
watercraft operations, does have regulations that
would also be applicable in the City of Long Beach.

1.4.6 Port of Long Beach
Port of Long Beach operations noise levels are
generally limited to the areas with the perimeter
of the Port. Noise associated with the Port includes
cranes, forklifts, and truck activities. Due to the
distance from daily operations, which are located
close to the coast, to the nearest sensitive uses, noise impacts are rarely audible at such a large distance.

Heavy truck traffic associated with the transport of
cargo along the I-710 corridor is the primary source
of noise associated with the Port. Impact associated
with the Port of Long Beach, including noise, were
assessed in the Port of Long Beach Community Impact
Study in July 2016.

1.4.7 Special Events Noise
The City of Long Beach is a growing tourist
destination with occasional noise generating from
temporary special events and filming. From major
conventions and international sporting events to
community-based festivals, parades, film production
and athletic activities, special events cultivate civic pride, social awareness and cultural enrichment for
both residents and visitors.

These temporary events include, but are not limited
to, community festivals, runs/walks, citywide holiday
celebrations, Long Beach Grand Prix, Long Beach
Marathon, Long Beach Lesbian and Gay Pride Parade
and Celebration, Jazz Festival, film production, and
events hosted at the Queen Mary such as Dark Harbor
and Chill. These activities help build a foundation
that fosters sustainable community development,
economic development, and tourism.

Rainbow Harbor
Long Beach Grand Prix
The City of Long Beach hosts many seasonal
events which may generate noise.

Temporary events and filming are exempt from the
noise ordinance, as they are temporary in nature.

Special Events and Filming staff are trained to be
sensitive to the needs of the residents and strive to
strike a balance between visitors and constituents.

Events are listed on the calendar and can be found
at www.filmlongbeach.com.

Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-15 1 Draft - February 2018

1.4.8 Stationary Noise Sources
Commercial, commercial-industrial, light-industrial,
and to a lesser extent residential land uses in the
City have the potential to generate high noise
levels and impact surrounding land uses with their
equipment operation. Noise sources from these
land uses include air conditioning or refrigeration
units, power tools, lawn equipment, generators, and
other powered mechanical equipment. Additionally,
activities that are not necessarily “stationary” include parking lot activities, truck deliveries, and events are oftentimes classified in the same categories.

1.4.9 Nuisance Noise
The City of Long Beach has a wide variety of land use
types. Within the commercial and downtown area,
certain uses including restaurants, bars, and clubs
have the potential to generate noise which may be
perceived as annoying or disturbing. Additionally,
sources of noise that are permissible under existing
laws and regulations still have the potential to disrupt the peace, cause sleep interference, and can create
an undesirable setting for residents. The following
list identifies some of the potential sources of noise
that have been noted to occur with regularity in the
City limits:

Truck deliveries are a stationary noise source
Other potential noise sources
Loud motorcycles
and speeding
vehicles.

Emergency
back-up
beepers.

Restaurant
and bar
operations.

House
parties.

Excessive HVAC
operations.

Construction
work.

Emergency
vehicle
sirens.

Train
horns.

Helicopter
and airplane
activities.

Car
alarms.

Barking
dogs and
loud birds.

Fireworks.

Leaf
blowers.
1-16
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.5 Existing Vibration Sources

1.5.1 Vibration Sources
Major vibration sources in the City include
construction activities, rail operations, heavy
vehicle traffic, and vehicle loading and delivery
operations. Other sources which have the potential
to cause vibration impacts are aircraft operations,
low-frequency music and some stationary sources.

Similar to noise standards, cities can adopt vibration
exposure standards regarding the sensitivity of land
uses which may be affected. In relation to vibration
impacts, there are two factors that are considered
to assessing the level of impact expected: the
potential for damage to a building or structure and
the potential of annoyance to people. Also similar to
potential noise impacts, the most efficient actions
to help reduce vibration impacts occur during the
planning and permitting phases of any project or
development.

1.5.2 Construction Activity Vibration
Construction activities can cause vibration that varies in intensity depending on several factors. The use of
pile driving and vibratory compaction equipment
typically generates the highest construction related
ground-borne vibration levels. Because of the
impulsive nature of such activities, the use of the
PPV descriptor has been routinely used to measure
and assess ground-borne vibration and almost
exclusively to assess the potential of vibration
to induce structural damage and the degree of
annoyance for humans. The two primary concerns
with construction-induced vibration, the potential
to damage a structure and the potential to interfere
with the enjoyment of life, are evaluated against
different vibration limits. Studies have shown that the threshold of perception for average persons is in the
range of 0.2 to 0.3 millimeters per second (0.008 to

0.012 inches per second), PPV. Human perception to
vibration varies with the individual and is a function
of physical setting and the type of vibration. Persons
exposed to elevated ambient vibration levels (e.g.,
people in an urban environment) may tolerate a
higher vibration level. Structural damage can be
classified as cosmetic only (e.g., minor cracking of
building elements) or may threaten the integrity of
the building. Safe vibration limits that can be applied to assess the potential for damaging a structure vary
by researcher and there is no general consensus
as to what amount of vibration may pose a threat
Potential to
annoy people.

Potential for damage
to building or
structure.

Threshold of perception for average
persons is in the range of 0.2 to 0.3
millimeters per second PPV.

Two factors help measure the impact of noise to
humans and buildings.

Construction-induced vibration may interfere
with the enjoyment of life.

Introduction, Setting, and the Fundamentals of Noise 1-17 1 Draft - February 2018
for structural damage to the building. Constructioninduced vibration that can be detrimental to a building is very rare and has only been observed in
instances where the structure is at a high state of
disrepair and the construction activity (e.g., impact
pile driving) occurs immediately adjacent to the
structure.

1.5.3 Rail Activity Related Vibration
Rail operations are potential sources of substantial
ground-borne vibration depending on distance,
the type and the speed of trains, and the type of
railroad track. People’s response to ground-borne
vibration has been correlated best with how quickly
sounds moves through the ground. The velocity of
the ground is expressed on the decibel scale. The
reference velocity is 1 x 10-6 inches per second. RMS,
which equals 0 vibration velocity decibels (VdB), and
1 inch per second equals 120 VdB. Although not a
universally accepted notation, the abbreviation
“VdB” is used in this document for vibration decibels
to reduce the potential for confusion with sound
decibels.

One of the problems with developing suitable criteria
for ground-borne vibration is the limited research
into human response to vibration and, more
importantly, human annoyance inside buildings.

The United States Department of Transportation,
Federal Transit Administration has developed
rational vibration limits that can be used to evaluate
human annoyance to ground-borne vibration.

These criteria are primarily based on experience
with passenger train operations (e.g., rapid transit
and commuter rail systems). The main difference
between passenger and freight operations is the
time duration of individual events; a passenger train
lasts a few seconds whereas a long freight train may
last several minutes, depending on speed and length.

1.5.4 Heavy Vehicles and Buses
Ground-borne vibration levels from heavy trucks
and buses are not normally perceptible, especially
if roadway surfaces are smooth. Buses and trucks
typically generate ground-borne vibration levels of
about 63 VdB at a distance of 25 feet when traveling
at a speed of 30 miles per hour (mph). Higher
vibration levels can occur when buses or trucks travel
at higher rates of speed or when the pavement is in
poor condition. Vibration levels below 65 VdB are
below the threshold for human perception.

1.5.5 Other Sources of Vibration
Annoyance
In addition to activities that have vibration impacts
which translate through the ground surface between
source and receptor, sources which generate high
levels of low-frequency noise may generate vibration
through air. These sources may include aircraft and
helicopter operations, low-frequency music and
other large stationary sources. When the vibration
effects of these sources are felt or experienced
by a receptor, to determine the level of impact,
low-frequency noise measurements are the best
method to determine the impact.

At 30 mph, buses and
trucks typically generate
vibration levels of 63 VdB
at a distance of 25 feet.

Vibration levels below
65 VdB are below the
threshold for human
perception.

Ground-borne
vibration decibels
depend on the
distance, type and
speed of trains,
and type of track.

Many factors affect ground-borne vibration. How loud are busses and trucks? 1-18
1 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

1.6 Community Engagement
To inform the Noise Element update and identify
potential issues, a variety of community engagement
strategies were employed during 2017. A City of Long
Beach project webpage was established as well as a
Facebook and Twitter account for the Noise Element
at #ListenUpLB. Project background was furnished
and the community was invited to use an online
engagement tool linked on the sites. The online tool
provided a map-based ability to provide comments
on a range of topics linked to specific locations
throughout the city. Awareness of this opportunity
for participation was provided through the City’s
website, emails, Facebook and Twitter advertising,
and counter cards placed throughout city hall and
other locations. Materials were provided in both
English and Spanish.

In addition, a series of meetings were conducted
with internal and external stakeholders. Initial
meetings were held with City departments and local
agencies including the Police Department, Noise
Control Office, Animal Care Services, Public Works,
Port, Airport and Long Beach Unified School District.

Meetings with focus groups included public health
professionals/academics, environmental justice,
bar and restaurant operators, and the construction
industry, as well as the Environmental Health
Working Group and various local school students in
their classrooms. Further, a Planning Commission
study session was conducted on April 20, 2017 to
introduce the Noise Element work effort and solicit
comments from commissioners and members of the
public.

Feedback provided through these various platforms
covered an array of topics and key themes are
summarized below:
» Develop regulations that respond to the evolution
of neighborhoods
» Needed coordination with other regulatory
agencies (rail, on-road vehicles, aircraft)
» Common annoyances: Leaf blowers, rail line
operations, motorcycles, helicopters, loud music,
construction, dogs, park/beach activities, bars/
restaurants, autos/freeway, industrial and
commercial uses
» Noise impacted communities in West Long Beach
» Effectiveness of good communication,
relationship-building, proactive noticing
» Technology trending toward quieter equipment
Received comments and input informed the location
of noise monitoring and the preparation of the
existing conditions report content. In addition, this
feedback will be carried forward to shape draft Noise
Element strategies and policies.

Community Engagement Posters
Existing Regulatory
Setting
2 Existing Regulatory
Setting
2 » 2.1 Federal Regulations .....................................................................2-1

2.1.1 Federal Railroad and Federal Transit Administrations.......................2-1

2.1.2 Environmental Protection Agency.........................................................2-2

2.1.3 International Building Code ...................................................................2-2 » 2.2 State Regulations .........................................................................2-2

2.2.1 State of California Noise Control Act ....................................................2-2

2.2.2 State of California Building Code...........................................................2-3

2.2.3 California Green Building Code .............................................................2-3

2.2.4 State of California Land Use Compatibility Criteria.............................2-4

2.2.5 State of California Vehicle Code ............................................................2-6

2.2.6 State of California Airport Land Use Requirements............................2-9

2.2.7 State of California Motorized Watercraft Requirements....................2-9 » 2.3 City of Long Beach .......................................................................2-10

2.3.1 Existing Noise Element ...........................................................................2-10

2.3.2 Existing Municipal Code .........................................................................2-10

2.3.3 Existing Noise Complaint Procedures...................................................2-21

2.3.4 Current City Noise Regulation Efforts...................................................2-22 2-1
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018

2.0 EXISTING REGULATORY

SETTING

2.1 Federal Regulations
While the City does not typically rely on any
specific federal noise regulations given that the
State level requirements, specifically the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the City’s
Noise Element and Municipal Code Noise Ordinance
provide more specific and restrictive regulations
related to noise and vibration impacts, the following
information is provided for reference and may be
used when local criteria are not established.

2.1.1 Federal Railroad and Federal Transit
Administrations
The guidelines in the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration
Impact Assessment (2006) general assessment
establishes thresholds for construction noise
identified as a 1-hour noise level of 90 dBA L
eq
for
residential uses during daytime hours and a 1-hour
noise level of 100 dBA L
eq
for commercial and
industrial uses. This provides reasonable criteria for
assessing construction noise impacts based on the
potential for adverse community reaction when the
noise thresholds are exceeded.

In addition to the vibration standards included in
the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment
(FTA 2006) for ground-borne vibration impacts on
human annoyance are shown in Table C above, the
criteria for potential damage from ground-borne
vibration and noise are based on the maximum
levels for a single event. Table D lists the potential
vibration building damage criteria associated with
construction activities, as suggested in the Transit
Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006).

FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to
102 VdB (equivalent to 0.5 in/sec in PPV) (FTA 2006) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced
concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster), and would not
result in any construction vibration damage. For a
nonengineered (those not designed by an engineer
or architect) timber and masonry building, the
construction building vibration damage criterion is
94 VdB (0.2 in/sec in PPV).

Table D: Construction Vibration Damage
Criteria
Building Category PPV
(in/sec)
Approximate
LV (VdB)1
Reinforced concrete,
steel, or timber (no
plaster)

0.50 102
Engineered concrete
and masonry (no
plaster)

0.30 98
Non-engineered timber
and masonry 0.20 94
Buildings extremely
susceptible to vibration
damage

0.12 90
Source: Table 12-3, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact
Assessment (FTA 2006).
1 RMS VdB re 1 µin/sec.
µin/sec = microinches per second
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
in/sec = inches per second
LV = velocity in decibels
PPV = peak particle velocity
RMS = root-mean-square
VdB = vibration velocity in decibels
2-2
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

2.1.2 Environmental Protection Agency
In 1972 Congress enacted the Noise Control Act.

This act authorized the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to publish descriptive data on the
effects of noise and establish appropriate levels
of sound. The document Information on Levels of
Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health
and Welfare With an Adequate Margin of Safety (EPA
1974) established that noise levels less than or equal
to 45 dBA would not interfere with indoor activities
or cause annoyance. Thus, an interior noise level of
45 dBA CNEL or less is often used to assure exterior
façades will provide adequate noise reduction.

2.1.3 International Building Code
The International Building Code (IBC) (ICC 2015)
has been adopted and used as a standard code
throughout most of the United States. Within the
IBC, standards for both reference or laboratory
ratings as well as field measured rating requirements
are identified to assure interior noise environment
thresholds are met. There are two specific class
ratings: (1) STC or Sound Transmission Class and (2)
IIC or Impact Insulation Class. The STC rating is often used for room-to-room assemblies and focuses more
on airborne noise impacts such as radio, television,
and human speech. The IIC rating is often used for
floor/ceiling assemblies to focus on structure-borne
noise such as footfall or objects being dropped. The
IBC specifies that a minimum STC or IIC rating of 50 is desired to provide a comfortable living environment.

2.2 State Regulations

2.2.1 State of California Noise Control Act
In 1975, the State of California established its own
Noise Control Act located in Division 28 of the State’s Health and Safety Code. Chapter 6, Assistance to
Local Agencies, provides direction on how the state
will assist each local agency in establishing local
ordinances and policies:

Chapter 6. Assistance to Local Agencies
46060. It is the purpose of this chapter to encourage
the enactment and enforcement of local ordinances
in those areas which are most properly the
responsibility of local government. It is further the
purpose to insure that the state is of maximum
assistance to local agencies in the discharge of
those responsibilities, furnishing technical and legal
expertise to assist local agencies in the enactment
and enforcement of meaningful and technically
sufficient noise abatement measures.
46061. The office shall provide technical assistance
to local agencies in combating noise pollution. Such
assistance shall include but not be limited to:

A. Advice concerning methods of noise abatement
and control.

B. Advice on training of noise control personnel.

C. Advice on selection and operation of noise
abatement equipment.
46062. The office shall provide assistance to local
agencies in the preparation of model ordinances to
control and abate noise. Such ordinances shall be
developed in consultation with the Attorney General
and with representatives of local agencies, including
the County Supervisors Association of California
and the League of California Cities. Any local agency
which adopts any noise control ordinance shall
promptly furnish a copy to the office.

Sound
Transmission
Class (STC):

Airborne
noise.

Impact
Insulation
Class (IIC):

Structureborne noise.

Two class ratings help to measure interior noise
thresholds.
2-3
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018

2.2.2 State of California Building Code
The State of California’s noise insulation standards
are codified in the California Code of Regulations
(CCR), Title 24, Building Standards Administrative
Code, Part 2, California Building Code. These noise
standards are applied to new construction in
California for the purpose of ensuring that the level
of exterior noise transmitted to and received within
the interior living spaces of buildings is compatible
with their comfortable use. For new residential
dwellings, hotels, motels, dormitories, and school
classrooms, the acceptable interior noise limit for
habitable rooms in new construction is 45 dBA
CNEL or Ldn. Title 24 requires acoustical studies for
residential development in areas exposed to more
than 60 dBA CNEL to demonstrate that the structure
has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable
rooms to acceptable noise levels. Where exterior
noise levels are projected to exceed 60 dBA CNEL
or Ldn at the facade of a building, a report must be
submitted with the building plans that describe the
noise control measures that have been incorporated
into the design of the project to meet the 45 dBA
CNEL or Ldn noise limit.

2.2.3 California Green Building Code
The California Green Building Code, also referred
to as CalGreen (ICC 2017), provides the following
requirements under Environmental Comfort related
to noise:

5.507.4 Acoustical control. Employ building
assemblies and components with Sound
Transmission Class (STC) values determined in
accordance with ASTM E 90 and ASTM E 413 or
Outdoor–Indoor Sound Transmission Class (OITC)
determined in accordance with ASTM E 1332, using
either the prescriptive or performance method in
Section 5.507.4.1 or 5.507.4.2.

Exception: Buildings with few or no occupants or
where occupants are not likely to be affected by
exterior noise, as determined by the enforcement
authority, such as factories, stadiums, storage,
enclosed parking structures and utility buildings.

Exception: [DSA-SS] For public schools and
community colleges, the requirement of this
section and all subsections apply only to new
construction.

5.507.4.1 Exteriors noise transmission prescriptive
method. Wall and roof-ceiling assemblies
exposed to the noise source making up the
building or addition envelope or altered envelope
shall meet a composite STC rating of at least 50
or a composite OITC rating of no less than 40,
with exterior windows of a minimum STC of 40
or OITC of 30 in the following locations:

1. Within the 65 CNEL noise contour of an
airport (see figure with airport contours on
page 3-33).

Exceptions:
a. Ldn or CNEL for military airports shall
be determined by the facility Air
Installation Compatible Land Use
Zone (AICUZ) plan.
b. Ldn or CNEL for other airports and
heliports for which a land use plan
has not been developed shall be
determined by the local general plan
noise element.

2. Within the 65 CNEL or Ldn noise contour
of a freeway or expressway, railroad,
industrial source or fixed-guideway source
as determined by the Noise Element of the
General Plan.

5.507.4.1.1 Noise exposure where noise
contours are not readily available. Buildings
exposed to a noise level of 65 dBLeq-1-hr
during any hour of operation shall have
building, addition or alteration exterior wall
and roof-ceiling assemblies exposed to the
noise source meeting a composite STC rating
of at least 45 (or OITC 35), with exterior
windows of a minimum STC of 40 (or OITC
30).
2-4
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

5.507.4.2 Performance method. For buildings
located as defined in Section 5.507.4.1 or

5.507.4.1.1, wall and roof-ceiling assemblies
exposed to the noise source making up the
building or addition envelope or altered envelope
shall be constructed to provide an interior noise
environment attributable to exterior sources
that does not exceed an hourly equivalent noise
level (Leq -1Hr) of 50 dBA in occupied areas
during any hour of operation.

5.507.4.2.1 Site features. Exterior features
such as sound wall or earth berms may
be utilized as appropriate to the building,
addition or alteration project to mitigate
sound migration to the interior.

5.507.4.3 Interior sound transmission. Wall and
floor-ceiling assemblies separating tenant spaces
and tenant spaces and public places shall have
an STC or IIC of at least 40. For residential uses
or sensitive tenant spaces, a minimum STC or IIC
of 50. Note: Examples of assemblies and their
various STC rating may be found at the California
Office of Noise Control website.

2.2.4 State of California Land Use
Compatibility Criteria
The State of California adopts suggested land use
noise compatibility levels as part of its General
Plan Guidelines (California 2003). These suggested
guidelines provide urban planners with an integral
tool to gauge the compatibility of land uses relative
to existing and future noise levels. The guidelines
identify normally acceptable, conditionally
acceptable, normally unacceptable, and clearly
unacceptable noise levels for various land uses. A
conditionally acceptable designation implies new
construction or development should be undertaken
only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction
requirements for each land use is made and needed
noise insulation features are incorporated into
the design. By comparison, a normally acceptable
designation indicates that standard construction can
occur with no special noise reduction requirements.

The Land Use Compatibility Guidelines are shown in
Table E.

There are four categories
of noise levels for
various land uses that
help planners gauge the
compatibility of land uses
relative to existing and
future noise levels.

State of California Land Use Compatibility
Criteria.
2-5
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018
Table E: California Office of Noise Control Land Use Compatibility Matrix for Community Noise Exposure
Land Use Category
Community Noise Exposure
Ldn or CNEL, dB
55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Residential - Low Density
Single Family Duplex,
Mobile Homes
Residential - Multi-Family
Transient Lodging -
Hotels, Motels
Schools, Libraries,
Churches, Hospitals,
Nursing Homes
Auditoriums, Concert
Halls, Amphitheaters
Sports Arena, Outdoor
Spectator Sports
Playgrounds,
Neighborhood Parks
Golf Courses, Riding
Stables, Water
Recreation, Cemeteries
Office Buildings -
Business, Commercial &
Professional
Industrial,
Manufacturing, Utilities,
Agriculture
Normally Acceptable Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise
Conditionally Acceptable
New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.

Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice.

Normally Unacceptable
New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.

Clearly Unacceptable New construction or development should generally not be undertaken.

Source: California Department of Health, Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of Noise Elements of the General Plan, October, 2003. 2-6
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Article 2.5. Noise Limits
27200. (a) The Department of Motor Vehicles shall
not register on a dealer’s report of sale a new
motor vehicle, except an off-highway motor vehicle
subject to identification as provided in Division 16.5
(commencing with Section 38000), which produces
a maximum noise exceeding the applicable noise
limit at a distance of 50 feet from the centerline
of travel under test procedures established by the
Department of the California Highway Patrol.
(b) The Department of Motor Vehicles may accept a
dealer’s certificate as proof of compliance with this
article.
(c) Test procedures for compliance with this article
shall be established by the Department of the
California Highway Patrol, taking into consideration
the test procedures of the Society of Automotive
Engineers.
(d) No person shall sell or offer for sale a new
motor vehicle, except an off-highway motor vehicle
subject to identification as provided in Division 16.5
(commencing with Section 38000), which produces a
maximum noise exceeding the applicable noise limit
specified in this article, and for which noise emission standards or regulations have not been adopted by
the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency pursuant to the Noise Control Act of 1972
(P.L. 92-574).
(e) No person shall sell or offer for sale a new
motor vehicle, except an off-highway motor vehicle
subject to identification as provided in Division 16.5
(commencing with Section 38000), which produces
noise that exceeds or in any way violates the noise
emission standards or regulations adopted for
such a motor vehicle by the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the
Noise Control Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-574).
(f) As used in this section, the term “register” is
equivalent to the term “licensing” as used in Section
6(e)(2) of the Noise Control Act of 1972

2.2.5 State of California Vehicle Code
Division 12, Equipment of Vehicles, Chapter 5, Other
Equipment, Article 2, Exhaust Systems, and Article

2.5, Noise Limits, provide regulations related to noise levels associated with motor vehicles as follows.

Article 2. Exhaust Systems
27150. (a) Every motor vehicle subject to registration
shall at all times be equipped with an adequate
muffler in constant operation and properly
maintained to prevent any excessive or unusual
noise, and no muffler or exhaust system shall be
equipped with a cutout, bypass, or similar device.
(b) Except as provided in Division 16.5 (commencing
with Section 38000) with respect to off-highway
motor vehicles subject to identification, every
passenger vehicle operated off the highways shall at
all times be equipped with an adequate muffler in
constant operation and properly maintained so as to
meet the requirements of Article 2.5 (commencing
with Section 27200), and no muffler or exhaust
system shall be equipped with a cutout, bypass, or
similar device.
(c) The provisions of subdivision (b) shall not be
applicable to passenger vehicles being operated off
the highways in an organized racing or competitive
event conducted under the auspices of a recognized
sanctioning body or by permit issued by the local
governmental authority having jurisdiction.
27150.1. No person engaged in a business that
involves the selling of motor vehicle exhaust
systems, or parts thereof, including, but not
limited to, mufflers, shall offer for sale, sell, or
install, a motor vehicle exhaust system, or part
thereof, including, but not limited to, a muffler,
unless it meets the regulations and standards
applicable pursuant to this article. Motor vehicle
exhaust systems or parts thereof include, but are
not limited to, nonoriginal exhaust equipment. A
violation of this section is a misdemeanor.
2-7
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018
(c)
(1) The notice to appear issued or complaint
filed for a violation of this section shall require
that the person to whom the notice to appear
is issued, or against whom the complaint is
filed, produce proof of correction pursuant
to Section 40150.
(2) Upon producing proof of correction to
the satisfaction of the court, the court may
dismiss the penalty imposed pursuant to
subdivision (b) for a first violation of this
section.
(d)
(1) This section is applicable to a person
operating a motorcycle that is manufactured
on or after January 1, 2013, or a motorcycle
with aftermarket exhaust system equipment
that is manufactured on or after January 1,
2013.
(2) Penalties imposed pursuant to this
section are in addition to penalties imposed
pursuant to any other applicable laws or
regulations.
(3) This section does not supersede, negate,
or otherwise alter any other applicable laws
or regulations.
27201. For the purposes of Section 27200, the
noise limit of 92 dBA shall apply to any motorcycle
manufactured before 1970.
27202. For the purposes of Section 27200, the
following noise limits shall apply to any motorcycle,
other than a motor-driven cycle, manufactured:
(1) After 1969, and before 1973 ........................88 dBA (2) After 1972, and before 1975 ........................86 dBA (3) After 1974, and before 1986 ........................83 dBA (4) After 1985 .....................................................80 dBA 27202.1. (a) Notwithstanding any other law,
a person shall not park, use, or operate a
motorcycle, registered in the State of California,
that does not bear the required applicable
federal Environmental Protection Agency
exhaust system label pursuant to Subparts
D (commencing with Section 205.150) and E
(commencing with Section 205.164) of Part 205
of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

A violation of this section shall be considered a
mechanical violation and a peace officer shall
not stop a motorcycle solely on a suspicion of
a violation of this section. A peace officer shall
cite a violation of this section as a secondary
infraction.
(b) A violation of this section is punishable as
follows:
(1) For a first conviction, by a fine of not less
than fifty dollars ($50), nor more than one
hundred dollars ($100).
(2) For a second or subsequent conviction, by
a fine of not less than one hundred dollars
($100), nor more than two hundred fifty
dollars ($250).
2-8
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
27203. For the purposes of Section 27200, the
noise limit of 82 dBA shall apply to any snowmobile
manufactured after 1972.
27204. For the purposes of Section 27200, the
following noise limits shall apply to any motor vehicle within the specified manufacturer’s gross vehicle
weight rating and date of manufacture:

GVWR—
Pounds
Date of
Manufacture
Noise
Limit—dBA
Over 6,000 after 1967 and
before 1973 88
Over 6,000 after 1972 and
before 1975 86
Over 6,000 after 1974 and
before 1978 83
Over 8,500 after 1977 and
before 1982 83
Over 6,000
but not over
8,500
after 1977 80
Over 8,500 but
not over 8,500 after 1981 80
Over 10,000 after 1981 and
before 1988 83
Over 10,000 after 1987 80
27206. For the purposes of Section 27200, the
following noise limits shall apply to any other motor
vehicle, not specified in this article, manufactured:
(1) After 1967, and before 1973 ........................86 dBA (2) After 1972, and before 1975 ........................84 dBA (3) After 1974 ......................................................80 dBA 27207. No motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight
rating of more than 10,000 pounds and equipped
with an engine speed governor shall produce a sound
level exceeding 88 dBA, measured on an open site at
a distance of 50 feet from the longitudinal centerline
of the vehicle, when its engine is accelerated from
idle with wide open throttle to governed speed
with the vehicle stationary, transmission in neutral,
and clutch, if any, engaged. Test procedures for
compliance with this section shall be established
by the department, taking into consideration the
procedures of the United States Department of
Transportation. The procedures may provide for
measuring at other distances, in which case the
measurement shall be corrected so as to provide
for measurements equivalent to the noise limit
established by this section measured at 50 feet.
86 dBA
Noise limits to manufactured vehicles
84 dBA
80 dBA
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
2-9
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018

2.2.6 State of California Airport Land Use
Requirements
The State of California has multiple regulations and
standards that apply to airports. These are
briefly summarized below:
» The Aeronautics Division of the California State
Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
» Enforces the California Airport Noise Regulations.

These regulations establish 65 dB CNEL as the
noise impact boundary within which there shall
be no incompatible land uses. Airports are
responsible for achieving compliance with these
regulations. Compliance can be achieved through
noise abatement alternatives, land acquisition,
land use conversion, land use restrictions, or
sound insulation of structures. Airports not
in compliance can operate under variance
procedures established within the regulations.
» California Noise Insulation Standards apply
to all multi-family dwellings built in the State.

Single-family residences are exempt from these
regulations. The regulations require that all multifamily dwellings with exterior noise exposures greater that 60 dB CNEL must be sound insulated
such that the interior noise level will not exceed
45 dB CNEL. These requirements apply to all
roadway, rail, and airport noise sources.
» The State of California requires that all municipal
General Plans contain a Noise Element. The
requirements for the Noise Element of the General
Plan include describing the noise environment
quantitatively using a cumulative noise metric
such as CNEL or DNL, establishing noise/land use
compatibility criteria, and establishing programs
for achieving and/or maintaining compatibility.

Noise elements shall address all major noise
sources in the community including mobile and
stationary sources.
» Airport Land Use Commissions were created by
State Law for the purpose of establishing a regional
level of land use compatibility between airports
and their surrounding environs. The Los Angeles
County Airport Land Use Commission has adopted
an Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for Los
Angeles County airports including Long Beach
Airport. The AELUP criteria for sensitive land uses
at 65 dB CNEL for outdoor areas and 45 dB CNEL
for indoor areas of residential land uses.

2.2.7 State of California Motorized
Watercraft Requirements
The State of California has established requirements
and limits as it relates to noise associated with
watercraft. Any motorized vessel operated on the
inland waters of California or on ocean waters
within one mile of the coastline must be muffled or
otherwise prevented from exceeding the following
noise levels:
» As measured using a stationary sound level test as
defined by SAE J-2005:
– 90 decibels if the engine was manufactured
before January 1, 1993
– 88 decibels if the engine was manufactured on
or after January 1, 1993, or
» 75 decibels measured as defined by SAE J-1970
for all engines. However, such measurement
shall not preclude a stationary sound level test as
prescribed by SAE J-2005.

Exceptions to the above restrictions are made for
vessels participating in permitted regattas, boat
races or speed trials. Authorities generally agree that unbaffled exhaust pipes (stacks) and most waterinjected pipes do not meet the above noise level requirements. Unmodified outboards usually meet
legal requirements.
2-10
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

2.3 City of Long Beach

2.3.1 Existing Noise Element

2.3.1.1 Existing Standards
The City of Long Beach Noise Element considers the
impacts of stationary noise producers. Stationary
noise producers are entities with a fixed location that emit noise. The General Plan requires that sensitive
land uses not be subjected to excessive stationary
noise, either by mitigation at the source or through
planning measures that reduce sound exposure.

While the current General Plan does not contain a
land use compatibility table, Table F summarizes the
criteria for sensitive receivers.

Table F: City General Plan Recommended
Criteria for Maximum Acceptable Noise
Levels1
in A-Weighted Decibels (dBA)
Major Land
Use Type
Stationary Source Land Use
Noise Standards
Outdoor Indoor
Maximum
Single
Hourly
Peak
L10
2 L503 Ldn4
Residential5
7:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m.
70 55 45 45
Residential5
10:00 p.m. to
7:00 a.m.
60 45 35 35
Commercial
(anytime) 75 65 55 N/A
Industrial
(anytime) 85 70 60 N/A
Source: City of Long Beach Noise Element (1975) Table 11 1 Based on existing ambient level ranges in Long Beach and recommended U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ratios and standards for interference and annoyance.
2 Noise levels exceeded 10 percent of the time.
3 Noise levels exceeded 50 percent of the time.
4 Day-night average sound level. The 24-hour A-weighted equivalent sound level with a 10-decibel penalty applied to nighttime levels.
5 Includes all residential categories and all nose-sensitive land uses (e.g., hospitals and schools).

2.3.1.2 Goals, Plans, and Policies
One of the major functions of a General Plan Noise
Element is to establish goals to strive for, plans to help achieve those goals, and polices which regulate both
current and future developments and all activities
within the City limits. In the current version of the
City’s Noise Element, found in detail on pages 140
through 176, these are referenced as Implementation
Strategies, Categorical Recommendations, and
Transportation Noise Reduction Measures.

2.3.2 Municipal Code
The City’s Municipal Code is the document in which
specific planning and enforcement noise criteria is
presented such that, in conjunction with the City’s
Noise Element, noise impacts to sensitive receptors
are minimized. The following describes the individual
subsections and specific regulations:

2.3.2.1 General Noise Ordinance Standards
The City’s Municipal Code (Section 8.80.160—Exterior
noise limits) establishes maximum exterior sound
level standards. Standards vary depending on land
use. Table G outlines these criteria, which represent
noise limits that no person shall exceed through
sound they create or allow to be created.
2-11
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018
Table G: Maximum Local Noise Criteria
Receiving Land Use District
Maximum Noise Criteria (dB Lmax)
Daytime
(7 a.m. to 10 p.m.)
Nighttime
(10 p.m. to 7 a.m.)
District One — Predominantly residential with other land use types also present 50 45
District Two — Predominantly commercial with other land use types also present 60 55
District Three1
— Predominantly industrial with other land use
types also present 65 65
District Four1
— Predominantly industrial with other land
types use also present 70 70
District Five — Airport, freeways, and waterways regulated by other agencies Regulated by other agencies and laws
Source: City of Long Beach Municipal Code (1982)
1 Districts Three and Four limits are intended primarily for use at their boundaries rather than for noise control within those districts.
dB = decibel(s)
Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level
The City’s Municipal Code Section (8.80.180—Interior
noise limits), establishes maximum interior sound
level standards. Standards vary depending on land
use. Table H outlines these criteria, which represent
noise limits that no person shall exceed through
sound they create or allow to be created.

B. No person shall operate, or cause to be
operated, any source of sound indoors at any
location within the incorporated limits of the City
or allow the creation of any indoor noise which
causes the noise level when measured inside the
receiving dwelling unit to exceed:

1. The noise standard for that land use district
as specified in Table G for a cumulative
period of more than five (5) minutes in any
hour; or

2. The noise standard plus five decibels (5 dB)
for a cumulative period of more than one (1)
minute in any hour; or

3. The noise standard plus ten decibels (10 dB)
or the maximum measured ambient, for any
period of time.

C. If the measured indoor ambient level exceeds
that permissible within any of the first two (2)
noise limit categories in this Section, the allowable
noise exposure standard shall be increased in
five decibel (5 dB) increments in each category as
appropriate to reflect the indoor ambient noise
level. In the event the indoor ambient noise
level exceeds the third noise limit category, the
maximum allowable indoor noise level under
said category shall be increased to reflect the
maximum indoor ambient noise level.
2-12
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Table H: Interior Noise Limits
Receiving Land Use District Type of
Land Use Time Interval Allowable Interior Noise Level (dBA) All Residential 10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m.
7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m.
35 45
All School 7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m.
(While school is in session) 45
Hospital, designated quiet zones,
and noise-sensitive zones Any time 40
Source: City of Long Beach Municipal Code (1982)
dBA = A-weighted decibel(s)

5.60.020—Special Events – Permit Required.

C. The City Manager may condition any permit
issued pursuant to this Chapter with reasonable
requirements concerning the time, place or
manner of holding such event as is necessary
to coordinate multiple uses of public property,
assure preservation of public property and
public places, prevent dangerous, unlawful
or impermissible uses, protect the safety of
persons and property and to control vehicular
and pedestrian traffic in and around the venue.

Conditions may include the use of sound
amplification equipment, and restrictions on the
amount of noise generated by motors and other
equipment used in the course of the event.

In 2009, ORD-09-0030 amended Section 8.80.160 of
the Municipal Code to amend the Noise District Map,
changing the portion of the City, north of the Long
Beach Airport and west of Lakewood Boulevard from
District One to District Two.

2.3.2.2 Title 5- Regulation of Businesses, Trades
and Professions
The purpose of this title is to identify those
businesses, trades and professions conducted and
carried on in the City that require local regulation
in order to promote and protect the public health,
safety and welfare of the citizens. The purpose of
this title is

1. to set forth the specific standards and
criteria under which such businesses, trades
and professions shall be conducted and
regulated within the City and,

2. to set forth the procedures and conditions
for applying for such a permit.

The following are the chapters and subsections that
relate directly to noise impacts:

5.51.065—Ice Cream Trucks – Additional Noise
Restrictions.

A. No person shall use, play or employ any sound,
outcry, amplifier, loudspeaker or any other
instrument or device for the production of sound
from an ice cream truck when the ice cream truck
is stationary.

B. The City may set reasonable restrictions in the
business license on the type and use of any
amplifier, loudspeaker, or any other instrument
or device for the production of sound employed
on an ice cream truck in order to prevent a
disturbance of the peace. Beach Streets Festival
2-13
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018
2-14
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

5.72.200, Subsection B.

11. Permittee agrees that the following standard
is reasonable: Noise emanating from Permittee’s
premises shall not be unreasonably loud or
disturbing in light of the facts and circumstances
then prevailing within fifty feet (50’) of the
perimeter of the premises in all directions. Sound
and amplification equipment shall be monitored
during business hours to ensure that audible
noise remains at acceptable levels in accordance
with Long Beach Municipal Code Chapter 8.80.

12. On and after the date this ordinance takes
effect, applicants for new entertainment permits
in the ODED must cause an acoustical study to
be prepared by a qualified, certified acoustical
engineer, hired by the applicant and acceptable
to the City, which shall demonstrate the sound
emanating from the applicant’s establishment
meets the sound standards described in Long
Beach Municipal Code Chapter 8.80. The study
shall be reviewed and confirmed by the Health
Department and the Development Services
Department during their review of the permit
application.

5.72.121, Subsection D.2.—Permit Application Filing
and Process for Adult Entertainment.
g. The premises within which the entertainment
is located shall provide sufficient sound absorbing
insulation so that noise generated inside the
premises shall not be audible anywhere on the
adjacent property or public rights-of-way or
within any other building or other separate unit
within the same building.

5.72.200, Subsection B.—Downtown Dining and
Entertainment District.

Long Beach Grand Prix Beach Streets Festival
2-15
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018

2.3.2.3 Title 6- Animals
The purpose of this title is to identify animal
regulations within the City. The following are the
chapters and subsections that relate directly to noise
impacts:

6.16.110—Dog Noise—Prohibited.

No person responsible for a dog shall permit such
dog to bark, howl, whine and/or make other loud
and unusual noises, whether within a building or
enclosure, tied, or otherwise confined, or while at
large upon any public street, sidewalk, improvement,
park or other public place, or private property, which
disrupts the public peace or which causes discomfort
or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal
sensitiveness residing in the area.

6.16.120—Dog Noise—Enforcement.

When the Director or his/her enforcement officer(s)
and/or inspector(s) determine that a person
responsible for a dog has violated Section 6.16.110
of this Code, such Animal Care Services Bureau
personnel are authorized to:

A. Direct the person responsible for the dog to
immediately terminate the actions of the dog
that are causing the loud noise;
B. Issue a written notice to the person responsible
that if, within a twelve (12) month period following
the initial response. Animal Care Services Bureau
personnel are again required to respond to
the same person responsible for violating
Section 6.16.110 of this Code, a criminal and/or
administrative citation will be issued pursuant to
Chapters 1.32 and 6.16 of this Code; and
C. Issue criminal and/or administrative citations to
the person responsible for recurrent violations
of Section 6.16.110 of this Code within a twelve
(12) month period.

2.3.2.4 Title 8- Health and Safety
Chapter 8.80 within Title 8 provides a variety of
subsections regarding to noise standards within
the City. The following subsections highlight the
information used on a daily basis by the planning
department to control noise impacts:

8.80.050 - Noise Control Officer—Duties.

In order to effectively implement and enforce this
Chapter, the Noise Control Officer shall, within a
reasonable time:

A. Investigate and Pursue Violations. Investigate
and pursue possible violations of this Chapter;
B. Delegation of Authority. Delegate functions,
where appropriate under this Chapter, to
personnel within the noise control office and to
other departments, subject to the approval of
the City Manager;
C. Community Noise Element.

1. Assist in the preparation or revision thereof
of the City noise element of the general plan
as required by Government Code Section
65302 (g), following guidelines set forth by
the State Office of Noise Control,

2. Assist in or review the total transportation
planning of the City, including planning for
new roads and highways, bus routes, airports,
and other systems for public transportation,
to insure that proper consideration is taken
with regard to the impact of sound levels
and that the policies set forth in the noise
element are adhered to,

3. Provide ongoing assistance to local agencies
in determining possible mitigating measures
for current or future noise problems;
D. Airport Noise Exposure. Assist the department
of aeronautics in developing a plan for noise
compatible land use in the vicinity of the Long
Beach Airport and maintain consistency with the
provisions and policies of the noise element of
the general plan;
2-16
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
E. State and Federal Laws and Regulations.

1. Prepare and publish with the approval of
the City Council a list of those products
manufactured to meet specified noise
emission limits under federal, State or
community law for which tampering
enforcement will be conducted, and

2. Make recommendations for modification
or amendments to this Chapter to insure
consistency with all State and federal laws
and regulations;

3. Administer Grants, Funds and Gifts.

Administer noise program grants, funds
and gifts from public and private sources,
including the State and federal governments;
F. Monitoring Responsibilities. Notwithstanding the
preemption by federal and State agencies of the
enforcement powers over certain activities, such
as those at the Long Beach Airport and at the
Long Beach Marine Stadium, the Noise Control
Officer shall monitor noise generated by such
preempted activities and report any violations
of State or federal regulations to the appropriate
enforcement agencies and to the City Council.

8.80.080—City departments—Legal compliance.

All departments engaged in any activities which
result or may result in the emission of noise, shall
comply with federal and State laws and regulations,
as well as the provisions of this Chapter, respecting
the control and abatement of noise to the same
extent that any person is subject to such laws and
regulations.

8.80.180—Interior noise limits—Correction for
character of sound.

In the event the alleged offensive noise contains
a steady audible tone such as a whine, screech or
hum, or is a repetitive noise such as hammering
or riveting, or contains music or speech conveying
information content, the standard limits set forth in
Table C in Section 8.80.170 shall be reduced by five
decibels (5 dB).

8.80.202—Construction activity—Noise regulations.

The following regulations shall apply only to
construction activities where a building or other
related permit is required or was issued by
the Building Official and shall not apply to any
construction activities within the Long Beach harbor
district as established pursuant to Section 201 of the
City Charter.

A. Weekdays and federal holidays. No person shall
operate or permit the operation of any tools or
equipment used for construction, alteration,
repair, remodeling, drilling, demolition or any
other related building activity which produce
loud or unusual noise which annoys or disturbs
a reasonable person of normal sensitivity
between the hours of seven p.m. and seven
a.m. the following day on weekdays, except for
emergency work authorized by the Building
Official. For purposes of this Section, a federal
holiday shall be considered a weekday.

B. Saturdays. No person shall operate or permit
the operation of any tools or equipment used
for construction, alteration, repair, remodeling,
drilling, demolition or any other related building
activity which produce loud or unusual noise
which annoys or disturbs a reasonable person
of normal sensitivity between the hours of seven
p.m. on Friday and nine a.m. on Saturday and
after six p.m. on Saturday, except for emergency
work authorized by the Building Official.

C. Sundays. No person shall operate or permit
the operation of any tools or equipment used
for construction, alteration, repair, remodeling,
drilling, demolition or any other related building
activity at any time on Sunday, except for
emergency work authorized by the Building
Official or except for work authorized by permit
issued by the Noise Control Officer.

Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday If authorized
by the
Building
Official
7 a.m. to
7 p.m.
7 a.m. to
7 p.m.
7 a.m. to
7 p.m.
7 a.m. to
7 p.m.
7 a.m. to
7 p.m.
9 a.m. to
6 p.m.

Construction Activity Operational Hours
2-17
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018
D. Owner’s/employer’s responsibility. It is unlawful
for the landowner, construction company
owner, contractor, subcontractor or employer of
persons working, laboring, building, or assisting
in construction to permit construction activities
in violation of provisions in this Section.

E. Sunday work permits. Any person who wants to
do construction work on a Sunday must apply
for a work permit from the Noise Control Officer.

The Noise Control Officer may issue a Sunday
work permit if there is good cause shown; and
in issuing such a permit, consideration will be
given to the nature of the work and its proximity
to residential areas. The permit may allow work
on Sundays, only between nine a.m. and six p.m.,
and it shall designate the specific dates when it
is allowed.

F. Enforcement. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Sections 8.80.370 and 8.80.380, this Section may
be enforced by a Police Officer.

8.80.210—Refuse collection vehicles.

No person shall collect refuse with a refuse collection vehicle between the hours of seven p.m. and seven
a.m. the following day in a residential area or noise
sensitive zone.

8.80.220—Motor vehicle horns.

It is unlawful for any person within the City to sound
a vehicular horn within any residential zone except
as a warning signal, as provided in the Vehicle Code
of the State.

8.80.240—Vehicle, motorboat or aircraft repair and
testing.

A. Repairing, rebuilding, modifying or testing any
motor vehicle, motorboat or aircraft in such a
manner as to create a noise disturbance across
a residential real property line, or at any time
to violate the provisions of Sections 8.80.150 or

8.80.170 shall not be permitted except where
said activities are directly related to officially
sanctioned events.

B. This provision shall not apply to aircraft within
the airport property or within any other aviationrelated property abutting it.

2.3.2.5 Title 9- Public Peace, Morals and Welfare
Chapter 9.31 within Title 9 provides information
related to noise impacts created by loud parties
on private property. The following subsection
establishes the prohibited noise impacts:

9.31.010—Loud Noises Prohibited.

No person shall cause or permit loud music or other
noises caused by a party, gathering or assemblage
of persons on private property to disrupt the public
peace. Noise that is audible from a distance of fifty
feet (50’) or more from the property shall be deemed
to disrupt the public peace. Any person who causes
or permits any such loud music or other noises is
guilty of a public offense punishable under the
provisions of Title 1, Chapter 1.32 of this Code.

2.3.2.6 Title 10- Vehicles and Traffic
Chapter 10.25 within Title 10 provides information
related to noise impacts created by car alarms. The
following subsection establishes the violations and
penalties:

10.25.010—Motor vehicle alarms—Violations—
Penalties.

B. No person shall cause, allow, permit or suffer
any alarm located in a motor vehicle registered
in the name of or operated by such person to
emit any continuous or intermittent audible
sound in the City for a period of more than
fifteen (15) minutes. The time shall be calculated
based upon the emission of the first audible
sound and ending fifteen (15) minutes thereafter
notwithstanding any variation or delay in the
emissions of audible sound.

Alarms shall not
sound for more
than 15 minutes.
2-18
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

2.3.2.7 Title 12- Long Beach Oil Code
Chapters 12.12 and 12.30 within Title 12 provide
information related to oil operations. The following
subsections establish hours of operation as well and
noise requirements:

12.12.060—Long Beach Oil Code, Special Conditions—
Generally.

G. Hours of Operation. All site work, operation of
any tools or equipment used for the construction,
alteration, repair, remodel, drilling, demolition,
delivery of equipment or materials attendant to
the preparation of a new drill, site maintenance
or any other related oil site activities that produce
loud or unusual noise which annoys or disturbs
a reasonable person of normal sensitivity are
permitted only between the days and hours
listed below:
– Weekdays and Federal Holidays: Between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
– Saturdays: Between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and
6:00 p.m.
– Sundays: Prohibited
Exception: Except in case of emergency work that is
required to avert a disaster at the well site or off-site piping associated to the well ope ration.

12.32.010—Excessive Noise Prohibited.

It is unlawful for any person to operate or cause to
be operated any oil production or gas processing
equipment on any well, or incidental to a well, within
the incorporated limits of the City in any manner so
as to create any noise which causes the exterior and
interior noise level at the receiving property to be in excess of those limits provided in Chapter 8.80.

12.32.020—Areas 5, 6, 7A, 7B, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 and 24.

A. No person, either as owner, agent, or operator,
shall conduct any drilling, or redrilling operation
at any well located within oil operating areas 5,
6, 7A, 7B, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 and/
or 24 in any manner so as to create any noise
which causes the exterior noise level when
measured at the property line of any singleor multiple-family dwelling unit, guest room, commercial building, school, hospital, church, or
public library to exceed the noise level standards
set forth in Table 1. The exterior noise level
generated by the drilling or redrilling operation
shall be continuously monitored to ensure
conformance to the noise level standards. The
costs of such monitoring shall be borne by the
operator conducting such operation.

No person, either as owner, agent, or operator,
shall conduct any drilling or redrilling operation
at any time at any well located in oil operating
areas 5, 6, 7A, 7B, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22,
23 and/or 24 in any manner so as to create any
noise which causes the interior noise level in
excess of those limits provided in Chapter 8.80.

If the existing ambient noise level, exclusive of
existing drilling activity, at the nearest adjacent
dwelling unit, guest room, commercial building,
school, hospital, church or public library property
line to the requested oil drilling site does not
exceed the permitted nighttime noise levels
in Table 1 for any period, then the following
regulations shall apply:

1. The only activity permitted between the
hours of seven p.m. (7:00 p.m.) and seven
a.m. (7:00 a.m.) will be “on bottom” drilling,
with single joint connections. During the
same time frame, none of the following will
be allowed:
a. Hammering on pipe;
b. Racking of pipe;
c. Acceleration and deceleration of engines
or motors;
d. Use of drilling assembly rotational speeds
that cause more noise than necessary
and could reasonably be reduced by use
of a slower rotational speed;
e. Picking up or laying down drill pipe,
casing, tubing or rods into or out of the
drill hole.
2-19
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018

2. If the measured ambient level exceeds that
permissible within any of the first four (4)
noise limit categories in Table 1 above, the
allowable noise exposure standard shall
be increased in five (5) decibel increments
in each affected category as appropriate
to encompass or reflect the ambient noise
level. In the event the ambient noise level
exceeds the fifth (5th) noise limit category,
the maximum allowable noise level under
said category shall be increased to equal the
maximum ambient noise level.

3. If the difference between the noise levels with
noise source operating and not operating is
four (4) decibels or greater, then the noise
measurement of the alleged source can be
considered valid with a correction applied to
account for the contribution of the ambient
noise. The correction is to be applied in
accordance with data shown in Table 2.

2.3.2.8 Title 14- Streets and Sidewalks
Chapter 14.24.040 provides information regarding
unnecessary railroad noise.

14.24.040—Railroads Obstructing Streets, Section

14.24.040—Unnecessary noise.

No person shall allow the ringing of engine bells and
the blowing of engine whistles when not in motion
and unnecessarily.

2.3.2.9 Title 16- Public Facilities
Chapter 16.43, Airport Noise Compatibility.

This chapter provides information regarding airport
noise requirements. The following subsections
provide more specific information:

16.43.030—Prohibited activities.

A. Training Operations. No Touch and Go, Stop
and Go, Practice Low Approach, or VFR Practice
Missed Approach shall be conducted at the
Airport except between seven a.m. and seven
p.m. on weekdays and between eight a.m. and
three p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays, New Year’s
Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor
Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day;
provided, however, that if any such holiday
falls on Saturday or Sunday and, as a result, a
holiday is observed on the preceding Friday or
succeeding Monday, then such Friday or Monday,
as the case may be, shall be considered to be a
holiday for purposes of this Section. Except for
instrument training, Training Operations shall
be conducted only on Runways 25R/7L and
25L/7R, unless the FAA directs such Operations
on Runways 34L/16R and 34R/16L.

B. Engine Runups. Engine runups shall be permitted
only between the hours of seven a.m. and nine
p.m. on weekdays and nine a.m. and nine p.m.
on weekends and holidays. Such runups may be
conducted only at locations designated for such
purposes by the Airport Manager. Nothing in this
Section shall be deemed to require relocation of
existing runup facilities for which appropriate
noise buffering devices have been constructed.

C. Formation Takeoffs and Landings. Except as
necessary in the manufacture or repair of
aircraft, formation takeoffs and landings are
prohibited at Long Beach Municipal Airport.

D. Unapproved Charter Flights. No proposed
charter operation shall be conducted unless the
written permission of the Airport Manager has
been sought and received before such operation
is scheduled to occur.

Whistles shall not
be blown while
engine is not in
motion.
2-20
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

16.43.040—Maximum SENEL limits.

A. Subject to the authority of the Airport Manager to adjust permissible single event noise limits for categories of Airport users in order to reduce such group’s cumulative noise levels, all non-governmental Operations at the Airport shall meet the following SENEL limits:
7:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m. to 11:00
p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
to 7:00 a.m.
11:00 p.m. and 6:00
a.m.

Monitoring Station
No.

Runway Departure/Arrival Departure/Arrival Departure/Arrival Departure/Arrival 30 102.5/101.5 90/90 79/79 9/10
12 102.5/101.5 90/90 79/79 10/9
25R 92/88 */ */ 6/1
25L 95/93 */ */ 5/2
7R 95/92 */ */ 2/5
7L 88/92 */ */ 1/6
*Except in case of emergency or air traffic direction, all aircraft Operations between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. are limited to runways 30 and 12.

B. Violations occurring during the period between
ten p.m. and eleven p.m. which are the result of
unanticipated delays beyond their reasonable
control of the aircraft Owner/Operator shall
be waived upon the presentation of evidence
satisfactory to the Airport Manager that the
delayed arrival or departure resulted from such
circumstances. Delays caused by mechanical
failure (but not by routine maintenance), by
weather conditions or by air traffic control
conditions will be considered beyond the Owner/
Operator’s control.

C. The SENEL limits for the period from six a.m. to
seven a.m. and from ten p.m. to eleven p.m. shall
be subject to revision at the end of the fourth
calendar quarter following the implementation of
this Chapter. If, for the period covered by the four
(4) calendar quarters following implementation
of this Chapter, cumulative aircraft noise has
exceeded the level allowed by Subsection

16.43.050.A, these limits shall be reduced to
eighty-five (85) SENEL. The SENEL for the period
from six a.m. to seven a.m. and from ten p.m. to
eleven p.m. shall, however, revert to ninety (90)
SENEL if, for any subsequent four (4) quarters,
cumulative aircraft noise has not exceeded the
level allowed by Subsection 16.43.050.A.

16.43.050. Cumulative noise limits and noise budgets.

It is the goal of the City that Incompatible Property
in the vicinity of the Airport shall not be exposed
to noise above sixty-five (65) CNEL. In determining
compliance with this noise goal and with the noise
budgets established by this Chapter, a tolerance
of one (1) dB CNEL will be applied. In assessing
cumulative noise levels for any period less than
one (1) year, the Airport Manager shall take into
consideration and allow for reasonably anticipated
seasonal variations in Operations and noise. The
noise of military and Public Aircraft, for which the
City bears no liability, will be excluded in calculating CNEL and in assessing compliance with the CNEL
goal and CNEL budgets set forth in this Chapter.

Industrial Operations. B.1. Pending assessment
of compliance with the CNEL budget applicable
to Industrial Operations, the number of
annual Flights by that user group shall not be
increased above the number for the twelve (12)
months ended October 31, 1990, as adjusted
to accommodate Flights for manufacturing
and test purposes by aircraft types which were
under design during the period from November
1, 1989, to October 31, 1990, but had not yet
entered service.
2-21
2 Existing Regulatory Setting
Draft - February 2018
Charter Operations. C1. In order to minimize
noise from Charter Operations, all Charter
Operations shall be conducted by aircraft which
comply with the standards of FAR Part 36 Stage
3 and all Charter Operations shall be scheduled
between the hours of seven a.m. and ten p.m.

Commuter Flights. D.1. Commuter Carriers
shall be permitted to operate not less than
twenty-five (25) flights per day, the number of
Flights authorized on November 5, 1990. Pending
assessment of compliance with the CNEL budget
applicable to Commuter Carriers, Flights by these
users shall not be increased above the number
permitted as of November 5, 1990.

Air Carrier Flights. E.1. Air Carriers shall be
permitted to operate not less than forty-one (41)
flights per day, the number of flights authorized
on November 5, 1990. Pending assessment of
compliance with the CNEL budget applicable to
Air Carriers, Flights by these users shall not be
increased above the number permitted as of
November 5, 1990.

2.3.2.10Vibration Standards

8.80.200—Noise Disturbances—Acts specified G.

Vibration.

Operating or permitting the operation of any device
that creates vibration which is above the vibration
perception threshold of an individual at or beyond
the property boundary of the source if on private
property or at one hundred fifty feet (150’) (forty-six (46) meters) from the source if on a public space
or public right-of-way. For the purposes of this
subsection, “vibration perception threshold” means
the minimum ground or structure-borne vibrational
motion necessary to cause a normal person to
be aware of the vibration by such directed means
as, but not limited to, sensation by touch or visual
observation of moving objects. The perception
threshold shall be presumed to be .001 g’s, g is the
equivalent to 9.81 m/s2, in the frequency range 0—30
hertz and .003 g’s in the frequency range between
thirty and one hundred hertz.

2.3.3 Noise Complaint Procedures
Currently, the City has established a process in which
noise complaints are responded to and dealt with in
a timely fashion. The Noise Complaint Processing
Network is a designed system in order to direct
complaints to the appropriate personnel depending
on the nature of the complaint. The current sub
groups within the network include the Health and
Safety Department, Department of Construction,
Police Department, Public Works, Animal Control
and Planning. Specific information on filing a noise
complaint is found of the City’s Health and Human
Services Website at http://www.longbeach.gov/
health/inspections-and-reporting/reporting/noisemonitoring/.

Health and Safety Department
Department of Construction
Police Department
Public Works
Animal Control
Planning
Go to the Health and Human
Services Website for information on
filing a noise complaint:
http://www.longbeach.gov/health/
inspections-and-reporting/reporting/
noise-monitoring/
Noise Complaint Processing
Network
2-22
2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

2.3.4 City Noise Regulation Efforts
In addition to the standards presented above taken
from the current Noise Element and Municipal Code,
the City makes a continual effort to regulate noise and create buffers from sources of noise to surrounding
sensitive receptors and land uses. Enforcement of
the regulations identified in this chapter is ongoing,
and efforts are made to inform the public through a
variety of means, such as information bulletins. For
example, Information Bulletin BU-027 – Construction
Noise Regulations provided by the Building
and Safety Bureau – summarizes construction
regulations including those contained in LBMC
§8.80.202 establishing construction hours when
noise is permitted and prohibited.

Through the review of projects in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
noise mitigation measures are prescribed through
approved Mitigation and Monitoring Programs to
limit excessive noise. The CEQA process provides a
tailored environmental analysis to address projectspecific impacts and individual context. Below is a brief discussion identifying noise mitigation
measures that could be employed for a project.

Examples of noise mitigation measures are drawn
from recent development projects including:
» Downtown Plan and Civic Center Project Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
» http://www.lbds.info/civica/filebank/blobdload.
asp?BlobID=5574
» Midtown Specific Plan MMRP
» http://www.lbds.info/civica/filebank/blobdload.
asp?BlobID=5765
Noise mitigations are typically divided into measures
addressing construction activities and measures
addressing project design and operation. For
construction noise, potential mitigation measures
include equipment mufflers, quieter models of air
compressors, locating stationary noise-generating
equipment farther from sensitive receptors,
no unnecessary idling of internal combustion
equipment, routing construction-related traffic away
from sensitive receptors, hours of loading/unloading,
150-foot radius noticing for construction activities,
establishing a construction liaison to respond to
noise complaints and provide corrections, provision
of temporary noise barriers or blankets, and
site-specific vibration mitigation.

For project design and operation noise mitigation,
potential mitigation measures include appropriate
site planning (for example, locating shared residential spaces behind buildings to reduce noise exposure),
mechanical ventilation in residential areas in higher
noise areas to allow for closed windows if desired,
installation of sound-rated windows and construction
methods, strategic placement of loading/unloading
areas, placement of HVAC in mechanical rooms
whenever possible, and provision of localized noise
barriers or rooftop parapets around mechanical
equipment.

A goal of the Noise Element effort is to further identify and standardize potential noise mitigation policies
and tools to minimize and manage noise citywide.

Existing Noise
Analysis
3 Existing Noise
Analysis
3 » 3.1 Existing Noise Monitoring Results .......................................3-1 » 3.2 Existing Traffic Noise Contours ............................................3-1 » 3.3 Existing Airport Noise Contours...........................................3-32 » 3.4 Existing Noise and Land Use Compatibility Discussion.....3-32 » 3.5 References ..............................................................................3-34 3-1
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018

3.0 EXISTING NOISE ANALYSIS

3.1 Existing Noise Monitoring
Results
Noise measurements were taken in February 2014
and May 2017 to record the actual existing noise
levels at various locations throughout the City.

The noise measurements represent a snapshot of
the current noise environment in the City. A noise
measurement survey of the City was conducted to
determine the location of noise measurement sites
that would provide a noise profile of the City. Several criteria were used in the site selection process
including, but not limited to, the proximity of a
measurement site to sensitive land uses as well as
its proximity to significant noise generators. Several
of the significant noise generators within the City are I-405, I 710, SR-91, SR-1, and Long Beach Boulevard.

This is due to the very high volume of automobile
and truck traffic at these freeways and roadways.

To provide noise measurement coverage of the
area, measurement sites were chosen within the
confines of the City. After the site selection process
was completed, a series of long-term 24-hour and
short-term noise 15-minute measurements were
taken at the chosen sites. The measurement site
locations are listed in Tables I and J and are shown
on Figure 2, Noise Monitoring Locations.

3.2 Existing Traffic Noise Contours
The noise model SoundPlan was used to evaluate
traffic-related noise conditions throughout the City.

This model requires various parameters, including
traffic volumes, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and
roadway geometry to compute typical equivalent
noise levels during daytime, evening, and nighttime
hours. The resultant noise levels are weighted and
summed over 24-hour periods to determine the Ldn
contours. Existing traffic volumes (SCAG 2017) were
used to assess existing traffic noise levels in the City.

Appendix A provides a summary of the traffic data
utilized to create the existing traffic noise contours
(Figure 3, Existing Noise Contours – pages 3-14
through 3-19 for composite mapping of all contours
and pages 3-20 through 3-33 for larger scale mapping
of 65 dBA Ldn and 75 dBA Ldn contours).
3-2
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Table I: Existing Long-Term 48-Hour Noise Level Measurements Day 1 Day 2 Average
Site
No.

Start
Date Location
Daytime
Noise
Level
Range
(dBA Leq)
Nighttime
Noise
Level
Range
(dBA Leq)
Daily
Noise
Level
(dBA
CNEL)
Daytime
Noise
Level
Range
(dBA Leq)
Nighttime
Noise
Level
Range
(dBA Leq)
Daily
Noise
Level
(dBA
CNEL)
Daily
Noise
Level
(dBA
CNEL)
Source(s) of
Noise
LT-01 5/12/2017
305
Newport
Avenue

53.2–61.5 42.2–52.6 58.6 49.9–63.1 43.7–53.1 58.8 58.7
Traffic on
Newport and
3rd Street.

LT-02 5/17/2017 3386 Elm
Avenue 58.3–64.1 53.4–59.4 64.7 58.7–63.9 52.9–61.6 65.2 64.9 Traffic on
I-405 and
Wardlow
Road and
some aircraft.

LT-03 5/17/2017
Orizaba
Avenue
and East
67th Street

62.0–67.6 61.0–66.4 70.7 62.1–65.6 61.0–66.6 70.8 70.8 Traffic on SR-91.

LT-04 5/17/2017
2603
Studebaker
Road

66.4–69.9 52.1–68.0 69.9 66.3–69.6 53.6–67.1 69.7 69.8
Traffic on
Studebaker
Road and
Willow Street.

LT-05 5/17/2017
6463 Bixby
Terrace
Drive

66.2–67.8 57.3–67.8 71.0 66.2–67.7 58.1–67.1 71.0 71.0 Traffic on 7th Street.

LT-06 5/15/2017 2001 River
Avenue 67.0–70.3 59.0–70.5 72.0 65.2–72.1 55.9–64.3 70.2 71.1 Traffic on
SR-103 and
SR-1, idling
trucks,
industrial
activity, and
aircraft.

LT-07 5/15/2017
1222 West
Spring
Street

67.2–70.8 62.9–69.6 74.0 68.0–70.1 63.5–70.0 73.9 73.9
Traffic on
I-710 and
aircraft.

LT-08 5/12/2017
151 South
Pine
Avenue

61.2–66.1 56.3–64.5 68.8 61.3–67.1 56.3–65.3 69.4 69.1
Traffic on
Shoreline
Drive and
Pine Avenue.

LT-09 5/12/2017
215
Granada
Avenue

53.6–60.3 45.1–54.4 59.6 51.6–59.4 44.2–54.1 59.6 59.6
Traffic on
Granada
Avenue
and Second
Street.
3-3
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Day 1 Day 2 Average
Site
No.

64.7–71.2

58.3–65.7

71.3 63.1–69.0 56.9–65.7 71.1 71.2 Light rail and
traffic on
Long Beach
Boulevard
and 4th
Street.

LT-11 5/15/2017
2250
Arlington
Street

54.3–60.5

55.1–58.9

64.3 53.8–59.6 48.1–55.8 59.9 62.1 Traffic on
I-405 and
airplanes.

LT-12 5/17/2017
256 East
Vernon
Street

57.6–65.4

49.2–60.1

62.2 57.8–60.1 49.9–60.5 63.0 62.6 Traffic on
Long Beach
Boulevard
and Willow
Street, trains,
construction,
and aircraft.

LT-13 5/15/2017
Del Mar
Avenue
and San
Antonio
Drive

65.3–67.5

58.1–68.4

71.1 65.4–70.8 52.6–65.4 69.6 70.3 Traffic on
I-710, trains,
and traffic
on Del Mar
Avenue.

LT-14 5/15/2017
Del Mar
Avenue
and Avery
Place

58.2–66.4

50.9–58.8

63.6 57.6–64.7 48.5–57.5 62.3 63.0 Traffic on
I-710, trains,
and traffic
on Del Mar
Avenue.

Source: LSA (2017).

Leq = average noise level
CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level
dBA = A-weighted decibel(s)
ft = feet
I-405 = Interstate 405
I-710 = Interstate 710
SR-1 = State Route 1
SR-91 = State Route 91
SR-103 = State Route 103
Table I: Existing Long-Term 48-Hour Noise Level Measurements (continued) 3-4
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements
Monitor
No. Date Start Time dBA L
eq
Location
Description Noise Sources Notes
ST-1 2/11/2016 7:27 a.m. 66.6
6857–6909
Atlantic
Avenue
Traffic on Atlantic Avenue,
faint traffic on I-710, and
trucks with trailers turning
in nearby lot.

Paused out pedestrian
pass-by talking loudly.

ST-2 2/11/2016 7:58 a.m. 70.3 3114 South
Street
Traffic on South Street and
birds. None.

ST-3 2/11/2016 8:58 a.m. 63.6
3115 Long
Beach
Boulevard
Traffic on Long Beach
Boulevard, backup
beeper across Long Beach
Boulevard, and birds.

Airplane: 15 seconds, 70
L
eq.

ST-4 2/11/2016 9:35 a.m. 65.7
1940 Long
Beach
Boulevard
Traffic on Long Beach
Boulevard, birds, and
distant music.

Paused out pedestrian
pass-bys. Train on
Long Beach Boulevard:
5 seconds, 68 Leq
/3
seconds, 70 Leq.

ST-5 2/11/2016 10:13 a.m. 63.3 614 Locust
Avenue
Traffic on 6th Street and
birds.

Paused out sirens and
pedestrians.

ST-6 2/11/2016 10:51 a.m. 64.0 600 Redondo
Avenue
Traffic on Redondo
Avenue. Car with loud
music pass-by.

Airplane, paused out
car in parking lot,
motorcycle, helicopter.

ST-7 2/11/2016 2:11 p.m. 62.3
5800–6462
East Marina
Drive
Traffic on 2nd Street and
birds.

Paused out cars on
Marina Drive. 2nd Street
level is ~10 ft higher
than measurement
location level.

ST-8 2/11/2016 1:15 p.m. 66.0
Cal State
University
Long Beach,
Bellflower
Boulevard
and Beach
Drive
Traffic on Bellflower
Boulevard, birds, and
music in car/horn.

Airplane: 7 seconds, 63
dB/23 seconds, 63 dB.

ST-9 2/11/2016 11:42 a.m. 62.0
3500
Hathaway
Avenue
Traffic on Hathaway
Avenue and distant music
in apartment.

Airplane: 35 seconds,
54 L
eq/8 seconds; 58
dB/12 seconds; 59 dB,
17 seconds; 56 dB/15
seconds, 55 dB. Paused
out siren. Location ~10 ft
above road level on the
berm of the apartment
level.
3-5
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Monitor
No. Date Start Time dBA L
eq
Location
Description Noise Sources Notes
ST-10 2/11/2016 8:31 a.m. 76.2 3245 Cherry
Avenue Traffic on Cherry Avenue.

Airplane: 5 seconds,
82 L
eq. Helicopter: 8
seconds, 74 Leq/5
seconds, 76 Leq.

Motorcycle: 2 seconds,
96 L
eq.

ST-11 2/11/2016 2:47 p.m. 62.5
3401
Studebaker
Road
Traffic on Wardlow Road. None.

ST-12 5/12/2017 10:32 a.m. 55.3 951 Maine
Avenue
Traffic on I-710, aircraft,
birds chirping constantly.

Helicopter ~75 dBA
max. Distant helicopter.

Filtered sirens and
dogs. Aircraft, 55 dBA
max, train horn in low
50s. Aircraft, 63.2 dBA
max. People talking
in the distance near
playground area.

ST-13 5/17/2017 10:15 a.m. 65.0 3402 Clark
Avenue
Traffic on Clark Avenue
and Wardlow Road. Some
aircraft noise.
51 dBA low traffic noise.

74.3/73.0/66.0 dBA/68.7
dBA/71.4 dBA traffic
on Clark Avenue, 75.0
dBA with truck. 65.0
dBA aircraft noise with
traffic.

ST-14 5/12/2017 12:10 p.m. 70.0
2002 Pacific
Coast
Highway
Traffic on Pacific Coast
Highway and Cherry
Avenue.

Filtered parking lot
activity. Loud car 83.0
dBA max, filtered
emergency vehicle, car
door slam (partial filter),
plane flyover (max 75.0
dBA), crosswalk has
speaker, beeps.

ST-15 5/12/2017 10:07 a.m. 63.3 Scherer Park
Traffic on East Del Amo
Boulevard. Aircraft noise,
leaf blower across the
street near the YMCA,
and some landscaping
activities.

53.0 dBA no traffic, with
leaf blower. 66.0 dBA
traffic on Del Amo, with
leaf blower. 60.0 dBA
traffic on Del Amo, with
leaf blower. 78.0/68.0
dBA aircraft noise.

Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements (continued) 3-6
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Monitor
No. Date Start Time dBA L
eq
Location
Description Noise Sources Notes
ST-16 5/17/2017 9:29 a.m. 54.9
Pan-American
Park, 5157
Centralia
Street
Traffic on Centralia Street
and Clark Avenue.

Loud car, airplane

71.4 dB, 9:32 a.m. two
people begin practicing
cricket at 49.1 dBA on
the other side of the
diamond, airplane 67.7
dBA max with little to no
traffic, 61 dBA traffic on
Centralia Street, birds
chirping, distant aircraft.

ST-17 5/17/2017 9:04 a.m. 56.6 5850 Los
Arcos Street
Traffic on Los Arcos Street
and Oceana Avenue.

Aircraft noise, some
landscaping activity.

48.0 dBA no traffic.
(Low) ambient noise.

60.0/58.0/57.0/58.0
dBA traffic on Los
Arcos Street. 67.0 dBA
landscaping noise (part
of it filtered out).

ST-18 5/17/2017 9:44 a.m. 56.1 7875 Rosina
Street

53.4 dBA low traffic noise.

63.0/62.0 dBA traffic on
Rosina Street and Val
Verde Avenue.

53.4 dBA low traffic
noise. 63.0/62.0 dBA
traffic on Rosina Street
and Val Verde Avenue.

ST-19 5/12/2017 11:21 a.m. 61.9
Bixby Park,
130 Cherry
Avenue
Traffic on Broadway
and Cherry Avenue and
helicopter flyovers.

Skateboarders near
Bixby Park Community
Center. Helicopter
and loud truck 70.3
dBA max, loud car ~70
dBA, helicopter flyover

72.5 dBA max. Loud
motorcycles 71-plus dBA
max, 72.5 max. Garbage
truck on Cherry Avenue.

ST-20 5/12/2017 12:54 p.m. 67.3 1600 Atlantic
Avenue at the
northwest
corner of
Martin Luther
King Jr.

Avenue and
15th Street
Traffic on Martin Luther
King Jr. Avenue and
skateboarders at skate
park across Martin Luther
King Jr. Avenue.

Loud car mid-high 70s
dBA. Loud car stereo
~74 dBA, loud cars 76.8
dBA, 84.4 dBA. Filtered
shouting. 1:07–1:08
p.m. distant plane
(traffic louder), 1:09 p.m.
distant plane (skate park
louder).

Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements (continued) 3-7
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Monitor
No. Date Start Time dBA L
eq
Location
Description Noise Sources Notes
ST-21 5/12/2017 11:46 a.m. 57.6
1085 Orizaba
Avenue
Traffic noise on Orizaba
Avenue and 11th Street,
aircraft noise, and noise
from school playground.

51.0 dBA playground
noise (no traffic). 71.0
dBA traffic on Orizaba
Avenue with playground
noise. 65.0 dBA aircraft
with playground noise.
61 dBA traffic on 11th
Street.

ST-22 5/15/2017 11:09 a.m. 71.5
1700 West
Willow Street
Traffic on Willow Street
and Santa Fe Avenue.

Aircraft mid 60s dBA,

75.8 dBA max, 71.1 dBA
max. 11:12 a.m., 11:16
a.m. traffic louder than
distant helicopters. Bus
stops at nearby stop.

Filtered emergency
vehicle and siren.

ST-23 5/17/2017 10:33 a.m. 68.2
2201 North
Bellflower
Boulevard
Traffic on Bellflower
Boulevard and Stearns
Street.

Loud motorcycle ~77
dBA. Direct airliner
flyover 78.9 dBA. Small
planes ~71 dBA, traffic
and small plane 69.2
dBA. Helicopter ~80
dBA. Plane 73.9 dBA.

Traffic louder than
tire service center and
dryers at carwashes.

Traffic and carwash
dryers 68.0 dBA. Traffic
high 60s low 70s dBA.

ST-24 5/12/2017 11:06 a.m. 56.3
South
Greenway
and Bixby
Village Drive
Traffic on Bixby Village
Drive, some traffic on
South Greenway, faint
aircraft noise.

42.5 dBA no traffic.

62.0/59.0 dBA no traffic
on Greenway. 72.0
dBA traffic, bus. 57.0
dBA traffic on Bixby
Village Drive. 68.0 dBA
helicopter.

Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements (continued) 3-8
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Monitor
No. Date Start Time dBA L
eq
Location
Description Noise Sources Notes
ST-25 5/19/2017 1:38 p.m. 67.0
1802 North
Studebaker
Road
Traffic on Studebaker
Road, Atherton Street, and
I-405.

Motorcycle on
Studebaker Road ~77.9
dBA. Heavy truck on
southbound Studebaker
Road ~79 dBA. Loud
pickup truck on
northbound Studebaker
Road 77.0 dBA. Traffic
on Studebaker Road
reaches low 70s dBA
intermittently.

ST-26 5/12/2017 10:32 a.m. 58.5
22 60th Street
Traffic on Ocean
Boulevard. Some noise
from street sweeper.

42.0 dBA no traffic.

57.0 dBA traffic on
Ocean Boulevard. 70.0
dBA traffic on Ocean
Boulevard.

ST-27 5/15/2017 12:27 p.m. 63.2 1147 East
South Street
Traffic on Orange Avenue
and South Street.

Filtered emergency
vehicle. 12:40 p.m.
distant car alarm.

ST-28 5/15/2017 11:51 a.m. 72.2
6020 Long
Beach
Boulevard
Traffic on Long Beach
Boulevard and Victoria
Street. Some trucks pulling
into stop.
11:54 a.m. plane (heavy
truck louder). Filtered
medium truck passby
directly behind meter.

High truck percentage.

ST-29 5/15/2017 10:33 a.m. 60.0
4974 Oregon
Avenue
Traffic on Del Amo
Boulevard and some traffic
on Oregon Avenue.

54.0 dBA low traffic on
Del Amo Boulevard. 63.6
dBA, 65/0 dBA traffic on
Del Amo Boulevard. 71.0
dBA traffic on Del Amo
Boulevard and aircraft
noise.

Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements (continued) 3-9
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Table J: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements (continued) Monitor
No. Date Start Time dBA L
eq
Location
Description Noise Sources Notes
ST-30 5/19/2017 12:51 p.m. 51.2
2339 Curry
Street
HVAC at 2380 Curry Street
and possible generator,
distant aircraft, and traffic,
some activity at industrial
uses at 2380 Curry Street
and 2339 Curry Street, and
a wind pump.

Occasional windpump
wheel noise (50.0–51.9
dBA). Aircraft ~50 dBA,
aircraft and wheel

54.5/~53 dBA. ~1:00
p.m. cars maneuvering
west of 2339 Curry
Street, high 50s, low
60s dBA. Car passby
mid 60s dBA, pickup
truck passby 61.9 dBA,
minivan 61.3 dBA.

Filtered dogs and distant
emergency vehicles.

ST-31 5/17/2017 8:46 a.m. 57.8
Hartwell
Park, 5801
Parkcrest
Street
Traffic on Carson Street
and Woodruff Avenue.

Two low-flying airplanes
and traffic 64.2 dBA. Car
without muffler low 70s
dBA Propeller plane and
light traffic 70.9 dBA.

Birds chirping. Allen Tire
Co. across street, traffic
is louder. Filtered sirens.

ST-32 5/12/2017 12:26 p.m. 65.2 Clark Avenue
and Atherton
Street
Traffic on Clark Avenue
and Atherton Street. None.

Source: LSA (2017).

L
eq = average noise level
CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level
dB = decibel(s)
dBA = A-weighted decibel(s)
ft = feet
HVAC = heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
I-405 = Interstate 405
I-710 = Interstate 710
SR-1 = State Route 1
SR-91 = State Route 91
SR-103 = State Route 103
3-10
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
#*
#*
#*
")
")
")
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
")
ST-12
ST-04
ST-05
LT-07
LT-06
LT-08
LT-10
ST-14
ST-19
ST-20
ST-22
LT-12
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ProposedNoiseMonitoringLocations.mxd (10/2/2017) FIGURE 2
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Noise Monitoring Locations
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Monitoring Location Type
") Long
#* Short

Page 1 of 4 ends

1 3
2 4
Figure 2: Area 1, Noise Monitoring Locations
3-11
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
#*
#*
#*
#*
")
")
")
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
ST-06
ST-07
ST-08
ST-09
LT-01
LT-04
LT-05
LT-09
ST-17
ST-21
ST-23
ST-24
ST-25
ST-26
ST-32
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ProposedNoiseMonitoringLocations.mxd (10/2/2017) FIGURE 2
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Noise Monitoring Locations
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Monitoring Location Type
") Long
#* Short

Page 2 of 4 ends

1 3
2 4
Figure 2: Area 2, Noise Monitoring Locations
3-12
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
#*
#*
#*
")
")
")
#*
")
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
")
ST-01
ST-03 ST-10
LT-02
LT-07
ST-15
LT-11
LT-13
ST-27
ST-28
ST-29
ST-30
LT-14
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ProposedNoiseMonitoringLocations.mxd (10/2/2017) FIGURE 2
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Noise Monitoring Locations
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Monitoring Location Type
") Long
#* Short

Page 3 of 4 ends

1 3
2 4
Figure 2: Area 3, Noise Monitoring Locations
3-13
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
ST-02
ST-11
LT-03
ST-13
ST-16
ST-18
ST-31
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ProposedNoiseMonitoringLocations.mxd (10/2/2017) FIGURE 2
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Noise Monitoring Locations
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Monitoring Location Type
") Long
#* Short

Page 4 of 4 ends

1 3
2 4
Figure 2: Area 4, Noise Monitoring Locations
3-14
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
1 3
2 4
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_Overview.mxd (12/12/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Contour Value
55 dBA Ldn
60 dBA Ldn
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
75 dBA Ldn
Overview
0 1 2
MILES
Figure 3: Existing Traffic Noise Contours Area Overview 3-15
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours.mxd (12/12/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
55 dBA Ldn
60 dBA Ldn
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
75 dBA Ldn
1 3
2 4

Page 1 of 4 ends

Figure 3: Area 1, Existing Traffic Noise Contours
3-16
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours.mxd (12/12/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
55 dBA Ldn
60 dBA Ldn
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
75 dBA Ldn
1 3
2 4

Page 2 of 4 ends

Figure 3: Area 2, Existing Traffic Noise Contours
3-17
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours.mxd (12/12/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
55 dBA Ldn
60 dBA Ldn
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
75 dBA Ldn
1 3
2 4

Page 3 of 4 ends

Figure 3: Area 3, Existing Traffic Noise Contours
3-18
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours.mxd (12/12/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours
0 2000 4000
FEET
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
55 dBA Ldn
60 dBA Ldn
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
75 dBA Ldn
1 3
2 4

Page 4 of 4 ends

Figure 3: Area 4, Existing Traffic Noise Contours
3-19
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba_Overview.mxd (12/12/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
Overview
0 1 2
MILES
Figure 3: Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) Area Overview 3-20
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 1 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 1, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 1 3-21
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 2 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 2, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 2 3-22
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 3 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 3, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 3 3-23
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 4 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 4, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 4 3-24
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 5 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 5, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 5 3-25
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 6 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 6, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 6 3-26
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 7 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 7, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 7 3-27
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 8 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 8, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 8 3-28
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 9 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 9, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 9 3-29
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 10 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 10, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 10 3-30
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 11 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 11, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 11 3-31
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 12 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 12, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 12 3-32
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 13 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 13, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 13 3-33
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
I:\RDG1701\GIS\ExistingTrafficNoiseContours_65_70dba.mxd (12/5/2017) FIGURE 3
City of Long Beach
Noise Element Update
Existing Traffic Noise Contours - 65 and 70 dBA Ldn
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
City of Long Beach Centerlines
Contour Value
65 dBA Ldn
70 dBA Ldn
13 9 10
5 6
1 2
14 11 12
7 8
3 4
0 1000 2000
FEET

Page 14 of 14 ends

Figure 3: Area 14, Existing Traffic Noise Contours (65 and 70 dba) 14 3-34
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

3.3 Existing Airport Noise Contours
As stated above, aircraft noise within the City is
predominately influenced by operations at the Long
Beach Airport. Currently, the Long Beach Noise
Airport Noise Office monitors the noise impacts
created by aircraft operations at 18 permanent
locations. The state-of-the-art noise monitoring
system along with the noise budget is utilized to keep
aircraft below the State mandated 65 dBA CNEL.

Noise sensitive receptors that are located within
the 65 dBA CNEL contours (Figure 4, Existing Long
Beach Airport Noise Contour) have the potential
to experience noise level impacts that may disturb
sleep without the implementation of proper noise
mitigation.

Other regional airports that have the potential
for operations to affect citizens of the City include
Compton/Woodley Airport (CPM), Los Alamitos Army
Airfield (AAF), John Wayne-Santa Ana International
Airport (SNA), and Los Angeles International Airport
(LAX). All sensitive uses within the City are outside
the 65 dBA CNEL contour of each airport.

3.4 Existing Noise and Land Use
Compatibility Discussion
As presented in Figure 3, there are portions of
the City in which noise sensitive uses fall within a
traffic noise contour that may present undesirable
noise environments. In addition to elevated traffic
noise levels, the City, due to its large population
and the numerous commercial or industrial uses,
it is understood that noise levels are of concern
to residents. The current Draft Land Use Element
provides a vision for future development in the
City of Long Beach and establishes revised plan
areas and neighborhoods. Utilizing the information
presented in the Draft Land Use Element, in order
to minimize noise conflicts to the greatest extent
feasible, the City intends to establish a thorough set
of goals, plans and policies in its General Plan Noise
Element to limit noise and land use compatibility
conflicts where possible. With the recognition of
the various neighborhoods, specifically the uses
that are contained with each area, more applicable
and unique criteria can be established such that the
citizens and business operators can work together
with the City to create an environment that is livable
and enjoyable.

3-35
3 Existing Noise Analysis
Draft - February 2018
Service Layer Credits: © 2017 DigitalGlobe
©CNES (2017) Distribution Airbus DS © 2017
Microsoft Corporation © 2017 HERE
SOURCE: Bing (11/2014); Noise Contours - City of Long Beach (4th Quarter, 2016) I:\RDG1701\GIS\LBAirport_NoiseContours.mxd (10/2/2017)
FIGURE 4
City of Long Beach Noise Element Update
Existing Long Beach Airport Noise Contours
LEGEND
65 dBA CNEL
70 dBA CNEL
City of Long Beach Boundary
0 750 1500
FEET
Figure 4: Existing Long Beach Airport Noise Contours
3-36
3 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018

3.5 References
Babisch W. Cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise
Health 2011;13:201-4.

City of Long Beach. 2017. General Plan. Draft Land
Use Element. Map LU-4.

City of Long Beach. 1975. General Plan. Noise
Element.

City of Long Beach. 1982. Municipal Code.

Department of Motor Vehicles. California: The Legal
Requirements of Boating. https://www.boat-ed.com/
abc/abc_specific_images/pdfs/ca_law.pdf
Environmental Protection Agency. 1974. Information
on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect
Public Health and Welfare With an Adequate Margin of
Safety. March.

Federal Railroad Administration. Public Crossing
Inventory Detail Report. http://safetydata.fra.dot.
gov/OfficeofSafety/publicsite/Query/invdetl.aspx
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006. Office of
Planning and Environment. Transit Noise and Vibration
Impact Assessment. FTA-VA-90-1003-06. May.

Harris. 1991. Handbook of Acoustical Measurement
and Noise Control.

International Code Council. 2015. 2015 International
Building Code. October.

International Code Council. 2016. 2016 California
Green Building Standards Code – California Code of
Regulations, Title 24, Pat11. July.

LSA. 2016. Noise Impact Analysis for the Land Use
and Urban Design Elements in the City of Long Beach,
California. March.

Port of Long Beach. 2016. Port of Long Beach
Community Impact Study. July.

State of California. Governor’s Office of Planning and
Research. 2003. General Plan Guidelines. October.

Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG). 2017. Transportation Model. http://www.scag.
ca.gov/DataAndTools/Pages/TransportationModels.
aspx
Appendix A -
Traffic Data
Appendix A -
Traffic Data
Appendix A - Traffic Data A-1
Draft - February 2018
Appendix A provides a summary of the traffic
data utilized to create the existing noise contours
presented in this report. The General Plan Mobility
Element establishes a context-sensitive street
classification plan for all streets within the City of
Long Beach. For reference, definitions of the street
classification system are listed below:

Regional Corridor
Designed for intraregional and intercommunity
mobility, these corridors emphasize traffic movement
and include signalized pedestrian crossings. The
adjacent land uses should provide continuous
mixed-use and commercial land uses with adequate
off-street parking to minimize dependency on
on-street parking.

Boulevard
Characterized by a long-distance, mediumspeed corridor that traverses an urbanized area, boulevards consist of four or fewer vehicle travel
lanes, a balanced multimodal function, landscaped
medians, on-street parking, narrower travel lanes,
more intensive land use oriented to the street, and
wide sidewalks. Buildings uniformly line the edges.

Multiway boulevards, a variation of the boulevard
characteristic of post war neighborhoods, contain
a central roadway for through traffic and parallel
roadways for access to abutting property parking,
and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Parallel
roadways are separated from the through-lane by
curbed, landscaped islands that may also provide
transit stops and pedestrian facilities.

Major Avenue
A major avenue serves as the major route for
the movement of traffic within the City as well
as a connector to neighboring cities. Most traffic
using a major avenue will end the trip within
the City (as opposed to through-traffic). As such,
design treatment and traffic operation should give
preference to this type of traffic. Long corridors
with typically four or more lanes, avenues may be
high transit ridership corridors. Goods movement is
typically limited to local routes and deliveries.

Minor Avenue
A minor avenue provides for the movement of traffic
to neighborhood activity centers and serves as a
route between neighborhoods. Avenues serve as
a primary bicycle route and may serve local transit
routes as well.

Neighborhood Connector
A neighborhood connector street serves trips
generated in surrounding or adjacent neighborhoods,
and should discourage through-trips that do not
end within the neighborhood. Goods movement is
restricted to local deliveries only.

Local Street
Local streets primarily provide access to individual
residential parcels. The streets are generally two
lanes with on-street parking, tree planting strips, and sidewalks. Traffic on a local street should have a trip end on that street, or on a connecting local street, or to a connector.

A-2 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
This page intentionally left blank.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-3
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Boulevard Terminal Island
Freeway Willow Street Pacific Coast Highway 16,900
Major Avenue Santa Fe Avenue Dominguez Street Carson Street 20,800 Carson Street Wardlow Road 19,900
Wardlow Road Willow Street 24,100
Willow Street Pacific Coast Highway 12,000
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 11,600
Anaheim Street 9th Street 8,000
Neighborhood
Connector Easy Avenue Wardlow Road Willow Street 7,700
Willow Street Pacific Coast Highway 4,900
Neighborhood
Connector Magnolia Avenue Wardlow Road Spring Street 7,500 Spring Street Willow Street 8,500
Willow Street Hill Street 3,100
Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 2,800
Minor Avenue Magnolia Avenue Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 5,200 Anaheim Street 10th Street 10,100
10th Street 7th Street 9,300
7th Street 6th Street 10,100
6th Street 3rd Street 7,600
Major Avenue Magnolia Avenue 3rd Street Broadway 15,000 Broadway Ocean Boulevard 24,700
Ocean Boulevard Shoreline Drive 28,500
Boulevard Magnolia Avenue Shoreline Drive Harbor Scenic 21,900 Minor Avenue Pacific Avenue North of Wardlow Road 19,500 Wardlow Road Spring Street 24,700
Spring Street Willow Street 18,100
Willow Street Hill Street 12,200
Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 10,000
Major Avenue Pacific Avenue Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 4,300 Anaheim Street 10th Street 9,800
10th Street 7th Street 8,400
7th Street 6th Street 12,600
6th Street 3rd Street 15,000
3rd Street Broadway 15,100
Broadway Ocean Boulevard 14,800
Minor Avenue Pine Avenue Ocean Boulevard Shoreline Drive 900 Boulevard Long Beach
Boulevard Greenleaf Boulevard Artesia Boulevard 26,400
Artesia Boulevard Victoria Street 28,000
Victoria Street Market Street 36,400
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data
A-4 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Market Street Del Amo Boulevard 25,100
Del Amo Boulevard San Antonio Drive 24,100
San Antonio Drive Bixby Road 25,300
Bixby Road Wardlow Road 36,100
Wardlow Road Spring Street 30,800
Spring Street Willow Street 12,600
Willow Street Hill Street 12,100
Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 8,700
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 8,400
Anaheim Street 10th Street 11,500
10th Street 7th Street 6,800
7th Street 6th Street 14,200
6th Street 3rd Street 7,800
3rd Street Broadway 9,800
Broadway Ocean Boulevard 6,100
Major Aveue Atlantic Avenue 70th Street Artesia Boulevard 33,100 Artesia Boulevard Harding Street 18,900
Harding Street South Street 22,500
South Street Market Street 14,600
Market Street Del Amo Boulevard 14,800
Del Amo Boulevard San Antonio Drive 12,500
San Antonio Drive Carson Street 11,300
Carson Street Bixby Road 26,600
Bixby Road Wardlow Road 23,600
Wardlow Road Spring Street 30,800
Spring Street Willow Street 12,600
Willow Street Hill Street 12,100
Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 8,700
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 8,400
Anaheim Street 10th Street 11,500
10th Street 7th Street 6,800
7th Street 6th Street 14,200
6th Street 3rd Street 7,800
3rd Street Boardway 9,800
Boardway Ocean Boulevard 6,100
Neighborhood
Connector
Martin Luther King
Jr Avenue Willow Street Hill Street 3,300
Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 3,800
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 5,700
Anaheim Street 10th Street 7,100
10th Street 7th Street 2,400
7th Street 6th Street 700
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-5
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Boulevard Alamitos Avenue Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 13,700 Anaheim Street 10th Street 24,200
10th Street 7th Street 24,500
7th Street 6th Street 31,000
6th Street 4th Street 36,500
4th Street 3rd Street 29,200
3rd Street Broadway 26,900
Broadway Ocean Boulevard 28,900
Minor Avenue Orange Avenue North of 70th Street 7,400
70th Street Artesia Boulevard 8,200
Artesia Boulevard Harding Street 8,800
Harding Street South Street 12,200
South Street Market Street 9,900
Market Street Del Amo Boulevard 10,500
Del Amo Boulevard San Antonio Drive 11,600
San Antonio Drive Carson Street 17,200
Carson Street Bixby Road 16,600
Bixby Road Wardlow Road 20,100
Wardlow Road Spring Street 12,500
Major Avenue Orange Avenue Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 17,200 Neighborhood
Connector Orange Avenue Pacific Coast Highway Alamitos Avenue 30,000 Alamitos Avenue Anaheim Street 2,500
Anaheim Street 10th Street 6,200
10th Street 7th Street 7,400
7th Street 4th Street 3,300
4th Street 3rd Street 5,400
3rd Street Broadway 4,600
Broadway Ocean Boulevard 3,900
Neighborhood
Connector Walnut Avenue Wardlow Road Spring Street 9,300 Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 7,800
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 2,900
Anaheim Street 10th Street 2,300
10th Street 7th Street 2,500
7th Street 4th Street 2,200
4th Street 3rd Street 1,300
Major Avenue Cherry Avenue 70th Street Artesia Boulevard 21,000 Artesia Boulevard Harding Street 31,300
Harding Street South Street 23,400
South Street Market Street 25,500
Market Street Del Amo Boulevard 33,100
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

A-6 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Del Amo Boulevard San Antonio Drive 43,200
San Antonio Drive Carson Street 14,700
Carson Street Bixby Road 17,600
Bixby Road Wardlow Road 18,100
Wardlow Road Spring Street 18,300
Hill Street Pacific Coast Highway 16,900
Minor Avenue Cherry Avenue Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 7,900 Anaheim Street 10th Street 4,400
10th Street 7th Street 5,700
Neighborhood
Connector Cherry Avenue 7th Street 4th Street 5,300
4th Street 3rd Street 3,500
3rd Street Broadway 7,000
Broadway Ocean Boulevard 1,900
Major Avenue Paramount
Boulevard 70th Street Artesia Boulevard 21,700
Artesia Boulevard South Street 31,000
South Street Market Street 24,800
Neighborhood
Connector Temple Avenue Spring Street Willow Street 12,900 Willow Street Hill Street 11,200
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 4,900
Anaheim Street 10th Street 6,500
10th Street 7th Street 2,500
7th Street 4th Street 2,600
4th Street 3rd Street 2,100
3rd Street Broadway 5,500
Neighborhood
Connector Obispo Avenue 70th Street Artesia Boulevard 6,600 Minor Avenue Downey Avenue 70th Street Artesia Boulevard 22,300 Artesia Boulevard South Street 19,900
Major Avenue Redondo Avenue Spring Street Willow Street 16,500 Willow Street Stearns Street 6,800
Stearns Street Pacific Coast Highway 15,100
Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 20,600
Anaheim Street 10th Street 16,800
10th Street 7th Street 16,400
7th Street 4th Street 10,700
Minor Avenue Redondo Avenue 4th Street 3rd Street 4,200 3rd Street Broadway 2,700
Neighborhood
Connector Redondo Avenue Broadway Ocean Boulevard 2,900 *The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-7
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Neighborhood
Connector Termino Avenue Redondo Avenue Pacific Coast Highway 7,200 Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 8,400
Anaheim Street 10th Street 9,600
10th Street 7th Street 7,700
7th Street 4th Street 13,000
4th Street 3rd Street 5,400
Regional
Corridor
Lakewood
Boulevard Del Amo Boulevard Carson Street 32,700
Carson Street Cover Street 35,700
Cover Street Conant Street 35,700
Conant Street Wardlow Road 35,700
Wardlow Road Spring Street 55,000
Spring Street Willow Street 29,700
Willow Street Stearns Street 37,700
Stearns Street Pacific Coast Highway 34,500
Minor Avenue Ximeno Avenue North of Pacific Coast Highway 18,300 Pacific Coast Highway Anaheim Street 18,800
Neighborhood
Corridor Ximeno Avenue Anaheim Street 10th Street 12,700 10th Street 7th Street 5,700
7th Street 4th Street 6,100
4th Street 3rd Street 4,500
3rd Street Broadway 4,100
Broadway Ocean Boulevard 4,100
Neighborhood
Connector Park Avenue Anaheim Street 7th Street 13,200
7th Street 4th Street 13,500
4th Street Broadway 4,700
Broadway 2nd Street 7,900
Minor Avenue Clark Avenue Del Amo Boulevard Carson Street 13,800 Carson Street Conant Street 17,200
Conant Street Wardlow Road 17,100
Wardlow Road Spring Street 3,800
Spring Street Willow Street 10,900
Willow Street Stearns Street 10,000
Stearns Street Atherton Street 7,400
Atherton Street Anaheim Street 7,700
Boulevard Bellflower
Boulevard Del Amo Boulevard Carson Street 23,300
Carson Street Conant Street 21,200
Conant Street Wardlow Road 20,100
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

A-8 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Wardlow Road Spring Street 18,700
Spring Street Willow Street 27,000
Willow Street Stearns Street 31,400
Stearns Street Atherton Street 34,100
Atherton Street 7th Street 28,700
7th Street Loynes Drive 13,400
Minor Avenue Woodruff Avenue Carson Street Conant Street 21,900 Conant Street Wardlow Road 22,300
Wardlow Road Los Coyotes Diagonal 15,100
Los Coyotes Diagonal Spring Street 16,700
Spring Street Willow Street 14,500
Minor Avenue Palo Verde Avenue Carson Street Conant Street 11,400 Conant Street Los Coyotes Diagonal 16,100
Los Coyotes Diagonal Wardlow Road 4,500
Wardlow Road Spring Street 5,100
Spring Street Willow Street 10,300
Willow Street Stearns Street 8,600
Stearns Street Atherton Street 8,700
Atherton Street Anaheim Street 6,400
Minor Avenue Studebaker Road Carson Street Wardlow Road 10,500 Wardlow Road Spring Street 13,000
Major Avenue Studebaker Road Spring Street Willow Street 21,300 Willow Street Atherton Street 11,500
Atherton Street Anaheim Street 10,500
Anaheim Street 7th Street 20,500
7th Street Loynes Drive 32,800
Loynes Drive 2nd Street 27,300
Neighborhood
Connector Pioneer Boulevard South of Carson Street 11,100 Major Avenue Norwalk North of Wardlow Road 28,500
South of Wardlow Road 23,500
Neighborhood
Connector 70th Street Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 25,900 Paramount
Boulevard Obispo Avenue 21,300
Obispo Avenue Downey Avenue 21,300
Major Avenue Artesia Boulevard West of Long Beach
Boulevard 9,600
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 20,800
Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 22,500
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 16,400
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-9
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Cherry Avenue Paramount
Boulevard 12,900
Paramount
Boulevard Obispo Avenue 16,600
Obispo Avenue Downey Avenue 17,900
Neighborhood
Connector Harding Street Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 4,100 Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 2,600
Minor Avenue Victoria Street West of Long Beach
Boulevard 21,200
Minor Avenue South Street Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 12,300 Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 11,500
Major Avenue South Street Cherry Avenue Paramount
Boulevard 14,400
Paramount
Boulevard Downey Avenue 17,600
East of Downey Avenue 22,300
Minor Avenue Market Street Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 7,300
Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 6,300
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 7,700
Cherry Avenue Paramount
Boulevard 16,800
Major Avenue Del Amo
Boulevard West of Long Beach
Boulevard 42,900
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 37,000
Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 28,500
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 27,500
East of Cherry Avenue 36,200
Minor Avenue San Antonio Drive Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 20,200
Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 25,000
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 29,000
Neighborhood
Connector Carson Street East of Santa Fe Avenue 300
Major Avenue Carson Street Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 21,000 Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 28,000
East of Cherry Avenue 35,100
West of Lakewood Boulevard 40,500
Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 17,700
Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 24,400
Bellflower Boulevard Woodruff Avenue 20,700
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

A-10 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Woodruff Avenue Palo Verde Avenue 14,100
Palo Verde Avenue Studebaker Road 12,900
Studebaker Road Pioneer Boulevard 42,900
Neighborhood
Connector Bixby Road Long Beach Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 3,800 Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 3,800
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 900
Neighborhood
Connector Conant Street Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 6,000 Bellflower Boulevard Woodruff Avenue 1,600
Woodruff Avenue Palo Verde Avenue 8,400
Major Avenue Wardlow Road West of Santa Fe Avenue 31,700 Santa Fe Avenue Easy Avenue 26,300
Easy Avenue Magnolia Avenue 29,700
Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 22,700
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 23,300
Minor Avenue Wardlow Road Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 14,000
Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 7,400
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 4,100
Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 20,700
Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 10,600
Bellflower Boulevard Woodruff Avenue 16,600
Woodruff Avenue Los Coyotes Diagonal 11,900
Los Coyotes Diagonal Palo Verde Avenue 16,800
Palo Verde Avenue Studebaker Road 19,600
Studebaker Road Norwalk 31,100
Minor Avenue Spring Street #REF! Long Beach
Boulevard 13,800
Major Avenue Spring Street Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 10,500
Atlantic Avenue Orange Avenue 15,400
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 17,500
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 21,900
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 23,700
Redondo Avenue Lakewood Boulevard 12,400
Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 30,500
Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 24,200
Bellflower Boulevard Los Coyotes Diagonal 17,500
Los Coyotes Diagonal Woodruff Avenue 16,900
Woodruff Avenue Palo Verde Avenue 19,800
Palo Verde Avenue Studebaker Road 22,600
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-11
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
East of Studebaker Road 25,400
Major Avenue Willow Street West of Santa Fe Avenue 39,500 Santa Fe Avenue Easy Avenue 36,500
Easy Avenue Magnolia Avenue 42,700
Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 32,900
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 45,200
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 42,500
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 36,800
Redondo Avenue Lakewood Boulevard 33,500
Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 31,700
Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 28,300
Bellflower Boulevard Woodruff Avenue 34,500
Woodruff Avenue Palo Verde Avenue 44,900
Palo Verde Avenue Studebaker Road 37,800
East of Studebaker Road 35,000
Neighborhood
Connector Hill Street Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 2,500 Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 2,400
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 1,200
Atlantic Avenue Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue 2,300
Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue Orange Avenue 2,800
Neighborhood
Connector Stearns Street Redondo Avenue Lakewood Boulevard 9,100 Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 5,000
Minor Avenue Stearns Street Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 7,700 Bellflower Boulevard Palo Verde Avenue 9,400
Regional
Corridor
Pacific Coast
Highway
Terminal Island
Freeway Santa Fe Avenue 46,500
Santa Fe Avenue Easy Avenue 49,200
Easy Avenue Magnolia Avenue 46,400
Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 46,700
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 53,100
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 41,900
Atlantic Avenue Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue 48,900
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

A-12 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue Orange Avenue 41,800
Orange Avenue Walnut Avenue 59,600
Walnut Avenue Cherry Avenue 56,200
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 67,200
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 62,700
Redondo Avenue Termino Avenue 64,800
Termino Avenue Lakewood Boulevard 70,800
Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 34,700
Clark Avenue 7th Street 47,600
7th Street Loynes Drive 38,700
Loynes Drive 2nd Street 44,200
South of 2nd Street 50,400
Boulevard Los Coyotes
Diagonal Lakewood Boulevard Clark Avenue 49,600
Clark Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 49,500
Bellflower Boulevard Woodruff Avenue 41,900
Woodruff Avenue Palo Verde Avenue 41,800
Palo Verde Avenue Studebaker Road 28,300
Major Avenue Anaheim Street West of Santa Fe Avenue 37,100 Santa Fe Avenue Magnolia Avenue 42,400
Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 30,300
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 34,200
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 27,300
Atlantic Avenue Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue 29,500
Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue Orange Avenue 29,400
Orange Avenue Walnut Avenue 25,700
Walnut Avenue Cherry Avenue 25,100
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 28,200
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 30,900
Redondo Avenue Termino Avenue 30,700
Termino Avenue Ximeno Avenue 32,300
Ximeno Avenue Pacific Coast Highway 24,300
Major Avenue 9th Street West of Santa Fe Avenue 14,900
East of Santa Fe Avenue 18,900
Minor Avenue 10th Street Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 6,500 Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 7,200
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-13
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 10,900
Atlantic Avenue Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue 10,300
Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue Orange Avenue 15,200
Orange Avenue Walnut Avenue 11,400
Walnut Avenue Cherry Avenue 10,200
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 13,100
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 11,200
Neighborhood
Connector 10th Street Redondo Avenue Termino Avenue 10,500 Termino Avenue Ximeno Avenue 12,300
Boulevard 7th Street West of Magnolia Avenue 9,000
Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 9,900
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 15,300
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 10,800
Atlantic Avenue Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue 16,000
Martin Luther King Jr
Avenue Orange Avenue 31,500
Orange Avenue Walnut Avenue 36,900
Walnut Avenue Cherry Avenue 37,800
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 46,800
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 44,400
Redondo Avenue Termino Avenue 40,100
Termino Avenue Ximeno Avenue 46,400
Ximeno Avenue Park Avenue 47,300
Park Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 47,100
Bellflower Boulevard Studebaker Road 82,300
Major Avenue 6th Street Shoreline Drive Magnolia Avenue 10,700 Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 11,300
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 16,200
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 8,200
Atlantic Avenue Alamitos Avenue 11,300
Minor Avenue 4th Street Alamitos Avenue Orange Avenue 10,300 Orange Avenue Walnut Avenue 9,900
Walnut Avenue Cherry Avenue 8,900
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 9,400
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

A-14 Existing Conditions Report
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 9,500
Neighborhood
Connector 4th Street Redondo Avenue Termino Avenue 5,900 Termino Avenue Ximeno Avenue 10,900
Ximeno Avenue Park Avenue 8,200
Neighborhood
Connector Eliot Park Avenue Bellflower Boulevard 5,100
Neighborhood
Connector Loynes Bellflower Boulevard Studebaker Road 11,600 Neighborhood
Connector Appian Park Avenue 2nd Street 4,700
Major Avenue 3rd Street Shoreline Drive Magnolia Avenue 4,000 Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 13,400
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 15,300
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 12,800
Atlantic Avenue Alamitos Avenue 14,100
Neighborhood
Connector 3rd Street Alamitos Avenue Orange Avenue 6,600 Orange Avenue Walnut Avenue 9,700
Walnut Avenue Cherry Avenue 9,700
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 4,700
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 6,000
Redondo Avenue Termino Avenue 1,400
Termino Avenue Ximeno Avenue 400
Major Avenue Broadway West of Magnolia Avenue 6,300
Magnolia Avenue Pacific Avenue 15,500
Pacific Avenue Long Beach
Boulevard 15,600
Long Beach
Boulevard Atlantic Avenue 14,100
Atlantic Avenue Alamitos Avenue 15,200
Minor Avenue Broadway Alamitos Avenue Orange Avenue 13,700 Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 12,800
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 18,700
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 16,100
Redondo Avenue Ximeno Avenue 8,500
Ximeno Avenue Park Avenue 7,500
Regional
Connector Ocean Boulevard West of Harbor Scenic 42,500
Boulevard Harbor Scenic Shoreline Drive 28,900
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Appendix A - Traffic Data A-15
Draft - February 2018
Classification Roadway Segment Between Existing ADT*
Shoreline Drive Magnolia Avenue 30,400
Magnolia Avenue Shoreline Drive 50,500
Shoreline Drive Orange Avenue 30,700
Orange Avenue Cherry Avenue 32,000
Cherry Avenue Temple Avenue 28,900
Temple Avenue Redondo Avenue 31,200
Neighborhood
Connector Ocean Boulevard East of 2nd Street 10,600
Boulevard 2nd Street Ocean Boulevard Ximeno Avenue 30,200 Ximeno Avenue Park Avenue 34,200
Park Avenue Appian 37,700
Appian Pacific Coast Highway 47,300
Pacific Coast Highway Studebaker Road 38,900
East of Studebaker Road 32,300
Boulevard Shoreline Drive North of 6th Street 20,000
6th Street 3rd Street 29,900
3rd Street Ocean Boulevard 35,100
Ocean Boulevard Magnolia Avenue 25,200
Magnolia Avenue Ocean Boulevard 24,700
Interstate I-710 Freeway Anaheim Street to Pacific Coast Highway 133,000 Willow Street to I-405 168,000
I-405 to Del Amo Boulevard 184,000
Long Beach Boulevard to SR-91 199,000
Interstate I-405 Freeway East of Studebaker Road 261,000 Studebaker Road to Palo Verde Avenue 267,000
Palo Verde Avenue to Woodruff Avenue 257,000
Woodruff Avenue to Bellflower Boulevard 262,000
Bellflower Boulevard to Lakewood Boulevard 274,000
Lakewood Boulevard to Cherry Avenue 282,000
Atlantic Avenue to Long Beach Boulevard 283,000
Interstate I-605 Freeway Los Alamitos to Spring Street 167,000 State Route SR-91 Alameda Street to Long Beach Boulevard 223,000 Paramount Boulevard to Downey Avenue 273,000
State Route SR-22 Studebaker Road to Los Angeles/Orange County Line 98,000
*The Existing ADT is based on the City of Long Beach 2013 Mobility Element.

Attachment E

FINDINGS
Noise Element General Plan and Municipal Code Amendment Application No. 2003-26 (GPA20-001)
June 6, 2023
The Long Beach Municipal Code does not require specific findings for the adoption of a General Plan or Zoning Code amendment. The proposed Noise Element, however, is consistent with State law and guidelines; consistent with other elements of the City’s General Plan; will not adversely affect the character, livability or appropriate development of the City; and is in conformity with public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good planning practice. The City of Long Beach makes these findings in support of its adoption of the proposed Noise Element and associated municipal code amendments.

The Noise Element is consistent with California Government Code §65300 requirements for a local general plan. Government Code §65300 requires the City to “adopt a comprehensive, long term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and of any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency’s judgment bears relation to its planning. Chartered cities shall adopt general plans which contain the mandatory elements specified in Section 65302.” The proposed Nose Element is a required element of the City of Long Beach General Plan. The Noise Element, as well as the combined elements of the General Plan (Land Use, Urban Design, Historic Preservation, Open Space, Housing, Air Quality, Mobility, Seismic Safety, Local Coastal Program, Noise, Public Safety, and Conservation) meet the requirements of the aforementioned Government Code. Per the Government Code, the Noise Element shall identify and appraise noise problems in the community. The Noise Element shall analyze and quantify current and projected noise levels for a number of stationary noise sources; show noise contours which shall be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses that minimizes exposure of community residents to excessive noise; include implementation measures and possible solutions that address existing and foreseeable noise problems; and serve as a guideline for compliance with the State’s noise insulation standards.

The General Plan, as amended by the Noise Element, is internally consistent, within and across elements pursuant to §65300.5. The Noise Element is consistent with and helps support other adopted general plan elements as described below:
• Land Use – The Noise Element builds upon and helps implement the Land Use Element (LUE) by reflecting both existing and planned mixes of compatible land uses as guided by the LUE and through new policies that help mitigate noise impacts. A key objective of the Noise Element is to provide noise exposure information for implementation of the LUE. When integrated with the Noise Element, the LUE will show acceptable new land uses in relation to existing and projected noise contours.

Attachment E
• Housing – Since residential land use is among the most noise sensitive, noise exposure information provided in the Noise Element must be considered when planning the location of and designing new housing.
• Mobility – The circulation system must be correlated with the LUE and is one of the major sources of noise. Thus, identifying ways to minimize noise exposure in the location and design of new transportation facilities is an important consideration, and planned land uses should incorporate project design features to minimize exposure to noise from existing transportation facilities. • Open Space – Excessive noise can adversely affect the enjoyment of recreational pursuits in designated open space. Thus, noise exposure levels should be considered when planning for this kind of open space use. Conversely, open space can be used to buffer sensitive land uses from noise sources through the use of setbacks and landscaping.
• Urban Design – Urban design techniques can be employed to mitigate noise impacts. The Urban Design Element therefore complements the Noise Element.

The Urban Design Element builds of the LUE PlaceTypes approach to allowing a greater mix of compatible uses within Long Beach neighborhoods in a harmonious manner supported by urban design strategies and policies.

The associated municipal code amendments are consistent with objectives, principles, and standards of the General Plan. Four general goals of the General Plan Noise Element include: a healthy, livable community; equitable distribution of noise; minimizing exposures to excessive noise; and allowing for elements necessary for a dynamic, growing City. The Municipal Code Amendments would not conflict with the City’s General Plan, the 2010 Strategic Plan, local coastal program, or any other applicable land use plans and policies. Actually, the Municipal Code Amendments help implement and will create consistency between the updated Noise Element and the City’s Noise Ordinance, found within Title 8 of the City’s Municipal Code. The code amendments involve amendments to the Noise Ordinance to reflect the changing urban landscape of the City and are not intended to conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing existing land use regulations. The code amendments are consistent with goals, policies and strategies in the existing Land Use Element (LUE) of the General Plan. The 2019 LUE update established a number of mixed-use PlaceTypes that delineate areas that are currently mixed-use in nature and that are planned or anticipated to be more mixed-use in the future, and where commercial, residential and other compatible land uses will be integrated. Proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance include updates to the boundaries of District Two of the Noise District Map to better reflect and be consistent with the recently adopted LUE PlaceTypes and establishment of a mixed-use land use category and associated noise limits and do not change noise limits for other land use categories.

A key component of the Noise Element update process was robust public engagement to inform the City’s noise plan, strategies and priorities. Public involvement in preparation Attachment E
of the plan met the requirements of §65351, which requires the planning agency to provide opportunities for the involvement of citizens, California Native American Indian tribes, public agencies, public utility companies, and civic, education, and other community groups, through public hearings and any other means the planning agency deems appropriate. This involvement included residents of Long Beach, California Native American tribes, other public agencies, community organizations, as well as other stakeholders. Opportunities to provide feedback informing the Noise Element update began in 2017 with a variety of community engagement strategies, including a significant online outreach component, “"Listen Up Long Beach," a crowdsourced digital mapping tool for the community to report on local noise issues, and multiple stakeholder meetings and focus groups. In October 2018, City staff held a focus group on Special Events and Outdoor Noise. In September 2019, Development Services Staff supported Special Events & Filming at their Special Events Sound Study community meeting. On May 30, 2019, Development Services staff held a Noise Element Open House. The Draft Noise Element was released for public review and feedback on May 28, 2019. Throughout the outreach and engagement process, staff gathered feedback about noise concerns, opportunities, and priorities from community members. The Proposed Noise Element incorporates feedback received from community members throughout the outreach and engagement process.

The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan Noise Element update and associated Noise Ordinance Amendments. The Noise Element builds off the LUE goals, policies and strategies to better reflect land use regulations that support a compatible mix of uses in strategic areas, as established in the LUE. Staff received 21 comments during the public comment period for the draft EIR and responded to the comments in the Final EIR which was made available to the public for review 10 days prior to the hearing and was shared with all interested parties.

The City did not receive any requests for formal consultation with Native American Tribes pursuant to §65352.3. In accordance with Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) requirements, the City contacted Native American representatives in April 2020 regarding the proposed Noise Element update. The representatives that were contacted were identified through a list of contacts provided by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). As provided in the tribal notices, approval of the project would not result in physical improvements including any physical improvements that would result in the disturbance of such resources. In accordance with Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52, the City will notify Native American representatives of future projects in the City that require a discretionary action as required.

The General Plan update and Municipal Code Amendments will not adversely affect the character, livability or appropriate development of the City, and is in conformity with public necessity convenience, general welfare, and good planning practice. The Long Beach General Plan Noise Element was first adopted in in 1975, and Attachment E
the Noise Ordinance was last comprehensively updated in 1977 based on the Noise Element. Since then, the City’s physical makeup, population, regional context and the regulatory guidance around noise have changed significantly. As Long Beach transitioned from a Los Angeles suburb to a vibrant, metropolitan community, the soundscape has also inevitably changed. The proposed Noise Element Update aims to replace the existing 1975 Noise Element of the Long Beach General Plan, respectively. The proposed Noise Element updates the City’s policy framework to reflect these changes in the City’s urban fabric and its soundscape in order to best serve the needs of Long Beach today and in the future. The Noise Element update aims to provide a tailored approach to noise policy across neighborhoods, recognizing the unique characteristics of a mixed-use downtown and major transportation corridor environments. Furthermore, the Noise Element update identifies new strategies and policies to maintain healthy, livable neighborhoods for all residents. As the City's current Noise Ordinance has not been substantively updated since 1977, there are several sections of the current code that include outdated standards, regulations, and references and that would be inconsistent with the proposed Noise Element. Proposed updates to the Noise Ordinance within the municipal code consist of modifications to the boundaries of District Two of the Noise District Map to better reflect and be consistent with the recently adopted LUE PlaceTypes; establishment of a mixed-use land use category and associated noise limits; and text changes to permit designated staff of all departments with noise regulation responsibilities to coordinate with and carry out the duties of the Noise Control Officer as necessary to ensure responsiveness to various kinds of noise complaints. The proposed municipal code amendments are designed to facilitate consistency between the updated Noise Element and the Noise Ordinance.

EXISTING Attachment F
Bay ShoreAve
Lakewo
od
Blvd
Alamitos Ave
4th St
Greenleaf Blvd
Artesia Blvd
Market St
Temple Ave
Atlantic Ave
South St
Cherry Ave
Bixby Rd
7th St
Pacific Coast Hwy
Shoreline
Dr
Park Ave
Ximeno Ave
Magnolia Ave
Los Coyotes Dia
Ocean Blvd
Downey Ave
Carson St
Hill St
70th St
Studebaker Rd
Queens Way
Anaheim St
Broadway
Harding St
Livingston Dr
Santa Fe Ave
Loynes Dr
Appian Way
Spring St
Redondo Ave
2nd St
10th St
Harbor Scenic Dr
Palo Verde Ave
Clark Ave
Wardlow Rd
Del Amo Blvd
Pacific Ave
San Antonio Dr
Paramount Blvd
Atherton St
Willow St
Orange Ave
Woodruff Ave
Lo
ng
Beach
Blvd
Bellflower Blvd Stearns St
Noise Districts
District 1 - Remainder of City
Proposed District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5 - Other Agencies
0 1 2 Miles
Noise District Map
Map Generated: 11/25/2019
Document Path: P:\GIS\Advance_Planning\Project_Files\NoiseContours.mxd Attachment G
Bay ShoreAve
4th St
Greenleaf Blvd
Atlantic Ave
Artesia Blvd
Anaheim St
Market St
Temple Ave
South St
Cherry
Ave
Bixby Rd
7th St
Pacific Coast Hwy
Ocean Blvd
Park Ave
Ximeno Ave
Magnolia
Ave
Los
Coyotes
Dia
Downey Ave
Carson St
Hill St
70th St
Studebaker Rd
Broadway
Harding St
Livingston Dr
Santa Fe Ave
Redondo Ave
Loynes Dr
Pacific Ave
Appian Way
Spring St
2nd St
10th St
Palo Verde Ave
Clark Ave
Wardlow Rd
Del Amo Blvd
San Antonio Dr
Atherton St
Willow St
Orange Ave
Woodruff Ave
Long
Beach
Blvd
Bellflower Blvd Stearns St
Proposed Noise District 2
Existing Noise Districts
District 1 - Remainder of City
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5 - Other Agencies
Long Beach 2040 PlaceType In Proposed District 2
DT, Downtown
NSC-L, Neighborhood Serving Center or Corridor Low Density OS, Open Space
TOD-L, Transit-Oriented Development Low Density
TOD-M, Transit-Oriented Development Moderate Density
WF, Waterfront
0 1 2 Miles
Proposed Noise District Map
with PlaceTypes
Map Generated: 10/17/2019
Document Path: P:\GIS\Advance_Planning\Project_Files\NoiseContours.mxd Attachment H

MARINE STADIUM
BASIN 7

CERRITOS
BAHIA
MARINA

CATALINA

LANDING

ENTRANCE CHANNEL

SAN PEDRO BAY

ALAMITOS
BAY

SAN GABRIEL RIVER

LOS CERRITOS CHANNEL

LOS ANGELES RIVER
BASIN 6

SOUTHEAST BASIN

COSTA DEL SOL MARINA

COLORADO
LAGOON

PIER J ENTRANCE CHANNEL

QUEENSWAY BAY

DOWNTOWN MARINA

RAINBOW
HARBOR
BASIN 5
BASIN 4
BASIN 3
BASIN 2
BASIN 1

CHRISMANS LANDING

ALAMITOS
BAY
RIVO
ALTO
NAPLES
CANAL
ALTO
CANAL
RIVO
RIVO
CANAL

ALTO CANAL

BOUTON CREEK

BENNETT
RD
PIER G
CORTO
WAY
PL

DEUKMEJIA N
LEES
VISTA
PL
BRIDGE
SADDLE
HWY

LINARES

PERALTA
CIR

WINDSORWAY
PL
PL

LAURINDA
ALLIN
QUINCY
W 1ST

DE SOTO
2ND
ELKO
ELIOT
ST
EUCLID
E 4TH
ST
AVE
AVE
PL
ST
PL

W OCEAN
AVE
ST
DR
ST
RD

MAHANNA
BRIDGE
E
5TH
COAST
CORONA
CREST

THERESA THERESA
ST
59TH
DR
AVE
ST
ROSE
AVE
AVE
AVE
ST
AVE
E

NEWPORT

TERRAINE
S
ST

FREEMAN
AVE

VILLAGE
E
AVE
GOLDEN

S CEDAR
AVE
AVE S

SEA SI DE
GOLDEN
PIER G

TILEAVE
AVE N

AQUARIUM
WAY
PL

EL MIRADOR

DIVISION
5TH
AVE
DR
BLVD

ALAMITOS
ST
DR
MANILA
AVE
AVE

W CAMPUS

STUDEBAKER
AVE
9TH
BLVD
6TH
8TH
PL
AVE
1 3RD
AVE
ST
ST

LINDERO

NEBRASKA
CAMPUS

SHOEMAKER
ULTIMO
SHORE
ST
7TH

JUNIPERO
DAISY

ST LOUIS
CEDAR
AVE
5TH

BELMONT

PALO VERDE
ST
AVE
ST
6TH
ST
AVE
AVE
E 5TH
ST
ST
ST
3RD
ST

BEVERLY
3 66TH
ST
AVE
GRAND

VERMONT
ST
SHIRE

CHANNEL

STORAGE YARD
AVE

ARGONNE
57TH
CHERRY
AVE

ROYCROFT
15TH
ST
AVE

BERMUDA
PL
PL
DR

APPLETON
BAY

SHORELINE
WAY
ST
AVE
AVEAVE

LOS ALTOS
HAVANA

TERRAINE

SANTIAGO
AVE
AVE
2ND
DR
OBISPO
AVE

ESPERANZA
LOYNES

PROSPECT
AVE

PACIFIC
ST
AVE
3RD
ST

PACIFIC
ST
AVE

ST JOSEPH
5 2 1
3 8
6 BIXBY TERRACE

ST JOSEPH
PL
VISTA
71ST
PL
FLINT
PIER J

HILLSIDE

ALAMITOS
AVE
QUEENS

SANTA ANA
QUEENS

WINSLOW

TREMONT

N THE PROMENADE
DAROCA
DR
LOCUST

BENNETT

JUNIPERO
ST
EUCLID
HWY
AVE

BENNETT
ST
ELIOT
ST
DAWSON

COLORADO
AVE

REDONDO
AVE
6TH
AVE
AVE
AVE
COVINA
1ST

W SEASIDE

LA VERNE
ST
ST
AVE
AVE
AVE

ORIZABA
AVE
AVE
5TH

SHOPKEEPER
5TH
ST

HELLMAN

CHESTNUT
DANA
ORANGE
AVE
AVE

SILVERA
18TH
58TH
54TH

PROSPECT
DR
8TH

ARGONNE

CERRITOS
ST
ST

BELMONT
AVE
ST

ARGONNE
ST

SANTIAGO
SHORE

ROYCROFT
MONRO
VIA
ST
MOLINO
FALCON

SILVERA

GAVIOTA
LIME
AVE
SHAW
E 9TH
APPIAN
AVE

COLORADO
ST
2 SEA CREST
3 SANDCASTLE
CT
6 WHEELHOUSE
7 COMPASS
8 TOP SIDE
4 ANCHOR

SPINNAKER

WINDJAMMER

SEAWIND
DR
DR

ISLAND VILLAGE
WY
W 5TH
W 4TH
AVE
5TH
AVE
ST

MAYFIELD
AVE
AVE
ST
OLIVE
WALNUT
AVE
BLUFF

VERMONT

STANLEY
MARINA
BLVD
DR
W 3RD
NIETO

STUDEBAKER
AVE

FLORIDA
ST

ROSWELL AVE
LOCUST
E 4TH
AVE
AVE
ST
GLADYS
MEDIO
9TH
BRIDGE
ST

PROSPECT
MONITA
PARIMA
BONITO
WAY
RD

HELLMAN ST
AVE
VISTA
DR
63RD
AVE
AVE
ST
AVE
10TH
DR
3RD
9TH
AVE
13TH
14TH
36TH
37TH
38TH
39TH
68TH
69TH
70TH
ST

W OCEAN

BROADWAY
LONG
POMONA
MARGO
5TH
6TH
9TH
W 3RD
ERIE

ROSWELL
DR
ACCESS
ST
LINDEN
8TH
W 10TH
W 4TH

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
DR

PACIFICA

ST JOSEPH
COAST
PL
SCENIC
BRIDGE
GLADYS
AVE

HILLSIDE
ROSE
AVE

CERRITOS
COVINA
QUINCY
LINDA
DR
AVE

PACIFIC
DAWSON
PL
DR

CERRITOS
AVE
1ST
DR
NIETO
AVE

CERRITOS
ST
DR

FREEMAN
CORONA
QUINCY
AVE
AVE
ST
ST
ST
AVE

MARIQUITA

HOLLY GLEN
PA R K

QUEENS HWY S

CHESTNUT

CO S TA
BALBOA
LAGUNA

HOFFMAN

DE FOREST
AVE

REDONDO
CIR
BIXBY
PL
PL
7TH
DAVIES
AVE

SANTA ANA

FEDERAT
OI N
PALOMA

CLAREMONT
LONNA

GLENDORA

MAGNOLIA
ST
AVE
HARBOR
PL
1ST

SEPTIMO

ARGONNE
NIETO
ORLENA

LIVINGSTON

PROSPECT

BERMUDA

HERMOSA
ALMOND
ST

RAYMOND
AVE
VISTA

ST LOUIS
4TH
7TH
2 ROSWELL
AVE
AVE

BENNETT
W
HWY
3 OCEAN

HARBOR SCENIC

RAYMOND
LOMA
ST
AVE

MIRA MAR
8TH
6TH
PL
PL
SURREY
2ND
ACCESS

IROQUOIS
72ND
KALLIN
BLVD

MARIQUITA
PL
PL
VINA

HOFFMAN
AVE
HARBOR
PANAMA

E CAMPUS

ATLANTIC

ST JOSEPH
PLAZA
62ND

HARBOR PLAZA
AVE

WISCONSIN

LINDERO

BELMONT
AVE
DR

LAUSINDA
AVE

BAY SHORE LAVERNE
MIDWAY

CORONADO

QUEENS HWY N
TOLEDO
VERA

KENNEBEC

BOATHOUSE
RANCHO
LOMA
CORONA

HERMOSA

ST LOUISORIZABA
DR

CLAREMONT
ST
3RD

REDONDO
LOMA

ATLANTIC

NEWPORT

LONG BEACH
6TH
AVE

SANTA ANA
BLVD
ORANGE
AVE
AVE
AVE
5 AVE
ST
MAINE

TERMINO
ST
MARINA

PROSPECT

ROXANNE
ST
AVE
ST
ST
ST
ST
S
ST
DR
DR
AVE
SCENIC
AVE
ST
LINDEN
PL
ST

REDONDO
AVE
AVE
AVE
BONITO
55TH
PL
65TH
MARINA
AVE
AVE
AVE
KAREN
W 9TH
AVE
ST

NEWPORT
W 6TH
AVE

BENNETT

CHESTER
AVE

GARDENIA
OBISPO
ST
XIMENO
W 7TH
5TH
7TH
W 5TH
3RD
ST
HARBOR
AVE
PIER G
AVE
E 9TH

CORONADO
VISTA
6TH
AVE
WAY

VILLAGE
ST
5 AVE
KALLIN
OHIO
AVE
ST
AVE
AVE
ST
ST

GAVIOTA

APPLETON
GRAND
ST
4 AVE
AVE
7TH
ST
DR
AVE
AVE

STANLEY
AVE
ST
PARK

PACIFIC
DR

MAGNOLIA
ELM
4TH
DR
LEWIS

ORIZABA
ULTIMO
W 6TH
AVE
S PINE
PL
MOLINO
AVE
AVE
DR
DAWSON
PL
ST
AVE
AVE
2ND
SCENIC
AVE
CHERRY

ORIZABA
WALNUT
ST
DAISY
ST
ST
LOMA
AVE
5TH
AVE
ROSE
W 7TH
7 4TH
LIME
AVE

BROADWAY
AVE
6 AVE
ST
ELIOT

LAVERNE
E 3RD
AVE
6TH
AVE
PL
ST
AVE
ST
1ST
AVE
ST
AVE
4TH
1ST
3RD

COLORADO
TEMPLE
AVE
ST
W 8TH
AVE
AVE
DR

TERMINO
ST
MAR
2 PL

BELMONT
2ND
56TH
E 10TH
ST

CHESTNUT
XIMENO

SHORELINE
PL
PIER J
PARK
TEMPLE
E 5TH
LOCUST
AVE
MARINA
8TH
AVE
OCEAN
8TH
19TH
AVE
DR
WAY
HARBOR

GRANADA

E SEASIDE
AVE
E 8TH
AVE

STEVELY

BROADWAY
4TH
OLIVE
AVE
DR
GLADYS
ST

TERMINO
PINE
AVE
BEACH
ST
PL
AVE
AVE
AVE
ORANGE

TERMINO
ST

SHORELINE
HARBOR
OCEAN
6TH
PINE
GRAND
AVE

ORIZABA
2ND
AVE
8TH
AVE
6TH

W SHORELINE
AVE
ST
OCEAN
W
AVE
MARGO
AVE
ST
AVE
1ST
COVINA
ST
AVE
TEMPLE
AVE

BROADWAY
AVE
ST
AVE
PICO
LIME
PL
10TH

BELMONT
PL
AVE
3 CHERRY
OHIO
AVE
PARK
OCEAN
AVE
GRAND
1ST

TERMINO
OLIVE

GRANADA
MAINE
AVE

MIRA MAR
VISTA
ST
4 BLVD
HWY

TERMINO
5TH

KENNEBEC
AVE
67TH

CORONADO OBISPO
ST
AVE
WAY
AVE
LOMA
3RD
4 DR
PL
ST
AVE
E 3RD
1ST
MARINA
AVE

ROSWELL
ST
VISTA
ST
60TH
MIRA

ST JOSEPH
AVE
AVE
ST

ROYCROFT
ST
AVE
PL
20TH
ST
AVE
PL
ST
XIMENO
AVE

HARBOR SCENIC

FLORIDA
AVE
AVE
MOLINO
AVE
AVE

E OCEAN
ST
ST
AVE
AVE
ST
PARK
XIMENO
ST
ST
AVE
6TH
MOLINO
CEDAR
5TH
AVE
ST
AVE
AVE
ST
EUCLID
AVE
AVE
3 ST
AVE E
VISTA
ST
ST
ST
AVE
DR
ST
ST
ST
ST
E 7TH
EUCLID
10TH

PACIFIC
ST

BELLFLOWER
POMONA

GRANADA

ROSWELL
MYRTLE
AVE

BROADWAY
AVE
ST
61ST

GLENDORA
AVE
AVE
TEMPLE
AVE
4TH

PARK PARK

STUDEBAKER
ST
MOLINO

CORONADO
ST
PL
LOYNES
PIER G
2ND
AVE

GAVIOTA
AVE
2ND
RD
ST
AVE
AVE
LOMA
64TH
6TH
ST
ST
ST
COAST
AVE
AVE
10TH
AVE
VISTA
AVE
AVE

MIRA MAR
DR
ST

THE TOLEDO
SOL
10TH
7TH
E 8TH

VERMONT
DEL
ELM
E 7TH

W BROADWAY

VERMONT
7TH

COLORADO
BIXBY

MASSACHUSETTS

COLLEGE PARK

LIVINGSTON

BROADWAY

COLORADO
GRAND
WAY

COLORADO
BLVD

BROADWAY
E 10TH
AVE
WAY
4TH
ST
BLVD
ST
AVE
HILL
AVE
E
E ST
PL
PL
9TH ST
DR
HAVANA
AVEAVE
AVE
AVE
1 OUTRIGGER
ST
2ND
2ND
ST
ST
AVE
AVE
DR
LN

GLENDORA
HAINES

FREEMAN

MONROVIA
QUINCY

ROYCROFT
POMONA

LOS ALTOS
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
DR
DR
LOYNES
DR
DR
DR
DR
SCENIC

QUEENS WAY
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
6TH
7TH
11TH
1ST
5TH
8TH
9TH
10TH
12TH
2ND
3RD
4TH
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
5 KEEL
CT
CT
WAY
WAY
WAY
WAY
WAY
WAY
WAY
APPIAN
RD
RD
BLVD
BRYANT
RD
RD
BLVD

MARINER

TALAVERA
ST
LINDEN

GOLDEN SHORE

WASHINGTON PL

W SHORELINE DR W

W SHORELINE DR E

THE PROMENADE N

PROMENADE
S
THE
AVE
AVE
E E
E
E
E
E E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E
E E
E
ST

HARVARD

STANFORD
LN
YALE
LN

COLLEGE
PARK
DR

NORTHWOOD
NASSAU
DR

OAKMONT

OAK HILLS DR

EL DORADO
DR

CANOEBROOK DR
2ND ST WESTMINSTER

ADOLFO LOPEZ

BLUE HERON
HERON
CIR

SEAL BEACH
BLVD

CRESTVIEW AVE

CATALINA AVE

LOS CERRITOS

WETLANDS

SOUTHSHORE
DR

TAPER DR

SANDPIPER DR

BEACHCOMBER DR

SEABREEZE DR

ISLAND VIEW DR

BAYSIDE DR

BOLSA AVE
HARBOR

FATHOM AVE WAY
BALBOA
DR

COASTLINE
DR

DRIFTWOOD
AVE

MARVISTA
AVE

CATALINA AVE
MARLIN
AVE

PACIFIC
COAST
HWY

SEAL BEACH
BLVD
17TH
ST
16TH
ST
15TH
ST
14TH
ST
13TH
ST
14TH
ST

DOLPHIN
AVE
12TH
ST

LANDING
AVE
AVE
AVE
11TH
ST
OCEAN
AVE
10TH
ST
10TH
ST
MAIN
ST
8TH
ST
7TH
ST
6TH
ST
5TH
ST

ELECTRIC

ELECTRIC
OCEAN
AVE
4TH
ST
3RD
ST
2ND
ST

CENTRAL
AVE
1ST
ST
MARINA
DR

MARINA DR

CLIPPER WAY
1ST
ST

SEAL BEACH
SHORES

GALLEON WAY

CORSAIR
WAY
AVALON
DR
CARMEL
AVE
T:\DevelopmentServices\Planning\Coastal\Updates\2023 Updates\Coastal Map_20x36 - Color Blind.mxd Source: California Coastal Commission Data (Delivered to the City of Long Beach 1/5/2023) MA-2022-001 (Coastal Commission Hearing Date 12/15/22)
Long Beach Resolution No. RES-21-0076 (Adopted 7/13/2021) Disclaimer
This map from the City of Long Beach is intended for informational purposes only.

While reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the data, the City assumes no liability or damages arising from errors or omissions. This map is provided without warranty of any kind. No part of this map may be reproduced or transmitted to any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording system.
q
Not A Part:

Port of Long Beach
As of January 2023
City of Long Beach Coastal Zone
Appealable Area Coastal Commission Permit Jurisdiction Coastal Zone Not A Part: Port of
Long Beach
Assessor Parcels Waterways
Attachment I

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS AND ERRATA
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2019050009

GENERAL PLAN NOISE ELEMENT AND
AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S NOISE ORDINANCE

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Submitted to:

City of Long Beach
Development Services, Planning Bureau
411 West Ocean Boulevard, Third Floor
Long Beach, California 90802
Prepared by:

September 2021
Attachment J
This page intentionally left blank

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT................................................................ 1-1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS AND ERRATA.................................................................. 1-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1 Index of Comments Received............................................................................................ 1-2

1.2 Format of Responses to Comments.................................................................................. 1-3

2.0 COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES............................................................... 2-1

2.1 Frequent Comments and Common Responses.................................................................2-1

2.2 Local Agencies................................................................................................................... 2-5 Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts..........................................................................................2-7 Long Beach Unified School District..................................................................................................2-9

2.3 Interested Parties............................................................................................................ 2-13 Pat Welch ......................................................................................................................................2-15 Rae Gabelich..................................................................................................................................2-17 Mark Breslin ..................................................................................................................................2-19 Claire Hess – Letter 1.....................................................................................................................2-21 Claire Hess – Letter 2.....................................................................................................................2-23 Debra Winter.................................................................................................................................2-25 Elizabeth & Sandra Stepan ............................................................................................................2-28 Heidi Maerker................................................................................................................................2-32 James Goodin ................................................................................................................................2-37 Katherine Kelton............................................................................................................................2-51 Linda Scholl – Letter 1 ...................................................................................................................2-53 Linda Scholl – Letter 2 ...................................................................................................................2-59 Linda Scholl – Letter 3 ...................................................................................................................2-66 Margaret Moustafa – Letter 1.......................................................................................................2-74 Margaret Moustafa – Letter 2.......................................................................................................2-77 Mary P. Mills..................................................................................................................................2-80 Randy Schafer................................................................................................................................2-85 Sandra Stanton ..............................................................................................................................2-88

3.0 ERRATA............................................................................................................ 3-1

4.0 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ....................................................... 4-1 TABLE
Table A: List of Comments Received ................................................................................................... 1-3

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» ii This page intentionally left blank

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 1-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document comprises the Comments and Responses and Errata volume of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Long Beach (City) General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80) (proposed project) for the City of Long Beach. The purpose of this document is to respond to all comments received by the City regarding the environmental information and analyses contained in the Draft EIR. These responses are intended to clarify information already provided in the Draft EIR and do not constitute new information or require recirculation of the Draft EIR. These responses to comments should be considered part of the Final EIR for consideration by the City Council prior to certification of the Final EIR.

As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (State CEQA Guidelines) Section 15087, a Notice of Completion (NOC), Notice of Availability (NOA), and copy of the Draft EIR were filed with the State Clearinghouse on March 23, 2021.

The NOA for the proposed project was published in the Press Telegram on March 23, 2021, distributed to various public agencies, citizen groups, Native American representatives, and interested individuals, and filed with the County of Los Angeles (County) Clerk on March 24, 2021.

Copies of the Draft EIR were also made available for public review at City Hall and on the City’s website. The Draft EIR was circulated for public review for a period of 45 days, from March 23, 2021, to May 6, 2021. Due to a noticing oversight, and in order to ensure that all interested parties had sufficient time to review, the public review period was extended from May 6, 2021, to June 14, 2021. On April 30, 2021, a notice of extension of the public review period was sent to the project distribution list and updated on the City’s website.

A total of 21 submittals commenting on the proposed project were received during the public review period or immediately thereafter. Comments were received from local agencies, as well as interested parties.

Comments that address environmental issues are responded to thoroughly in this document.

Comments that (1) do not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; (2) do not raise environmental issues; or (3) request the incorporation of additional information not relevant to environmental issues do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. However, the City has attempted to provide a response to each comment.

Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines, Evaluation of and Response to Comments, states:
(a) The lead agency shall evaluate comments on environmental issues received from persons who reviewed the Draft EIR and shall prepare a written response. The lead agency shall respond to comments raising significant environmental issues received during the noticed comment period and any extensions and may respond to late comments.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
1 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -2 (b) The lead agency shall provide a written proposed response, either in a printed copy or in an electronic format, to a public agency on comments made by that public agency at least 10 days prior to certifying an environmental impact report. (c) The written response shall describe the disposition of significant environmental issues raised (e.g., revisions to the proposed project to mitigate anticipated impacts or objections). In particular, the major environmental issues raised when the lead agency’s position is at variance with recommendations and objections raised in the comments must be addressed in detail giving the reasons why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted. There must be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information will not suffice. The level of detail contained in the response, however, may correspond to the level of detail provided in the comment (i.e., responses to general comments may be general). A general response may be appropriate when a comment does not contain or specifically refer to readily available information, or does not explain the relevance of evidence submitted with the comment.
(d) The response to comments may take the form of a revision to the Draft EIR or may be a separate section in the Final EIR. Where the response to comments makes important changes in the information contained in the text of the Draft EIR, the lead agency should either:

1. Revise the text in the body of the Draft EIR; or

2. Include marginal notes showing that the information is revised in the responses to comments.

Information provided in this Final EIR clarifies, amplifies, or makes minor modifications to the Draft EIR. No significant changes have been made to the information or analysis contained in the Draft EIR because of the responses to comments, and no significant new information has been added that would require recirculation of the Draft EIR document.

All comments, including those that do not address the analysis in the Draft EIR, will be forwarded to the City decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

1.1 INDEX OF COMMENTS RECEIVED
Table A consists of an index list of the local agencies and interested parties that commented on the Draft EIR prior to the close of the public comment period or immediately thereafter. The comments received have been organized by date received and in a manner that facilitates finding a particular comment or set of comments. Each comment letter received is indexed with a number below.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 1-3 Table A: List of Comments Received
Local Agencies
L-1 Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts May 6, 2021 L-2 Long Beach Unified School District June 14, 2021
Interested Parties
I-1 Pat Welch May 13, 2021
I-2 Rae Gabelich June 9, 2021
I-3 Mark Breslin June 11, 2021
I-4 Claire Heiss June 14, 2021
I-5 Claire Heiss June 14, 2021
I-6 Debra Winter June 14, 2021
I-7 Elizabeth & Sandra Stepan June 14, 2021
I-8 Heidi Maerker June 14, 2021
I-9 James Goodin June 14, 2021
I-10 Katherine Kelton June 14, 2021
I-11 Linda Scholl June 14, 2021
I-12 Linda Scholl June 14, 2021
I-13 Linda Scholl June 14, 2021
I-14 Margaret Moustafa June 14, 2021
I-15 Margaret Moustafa June 14, 2021
I-16 Mary P. Mills June 14, 2021
I-17 Randy Schafer June 14, 2021
I-18 Sandra Stanton June 14, 2021
I-19 Steven Ozawa June 14, 2021

1.2 FORMAT OF RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
Responses to each of the comment letters are provided on the following pages. The comment index numbers are provided in the upper right corner of each comment letter, and individual points within each letter are numbered along the right-hand margin of each letter. The City’s responses to each comment letter immediately follow each letter and are referenced by the index numbers in the margins.

An Errata, with text revisions, has been prepared as Section 3.0, to provide corrections and clarifications to the Draft EIR where required.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
1 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -4 This page intentionally left blank

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-1

2.0 COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES

2.1 FREQUENT COMMENTS AND COMMON RESPONSES
The following responses have been prepared to address frequent and similar comments received on the Draft EIR. These comments and responses are provided prior to the individual comment letters from local agencies and interested individuals and are referenced throughout Section 2.0, Comment Letters and Responses, of this Final EIR. All of the comments summarized below will be forwarded to the City decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

Common Comment No. 1: A number of comments were made during the public review period for the Draft EIR that expressed concerns or comments related to the Draft Noise Element, as provided in Appendix B of the Draft EIR. These comments were not related to the analysis contained in the Draft EIR but rather were related to various components of the Draft Noise Element. Common concerns related to the Draft Noise Element included the categorization of Special Events as temporary rather than stationary noise sources, and requests for mitigation of Special Events noise impacts were made citing the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines (2017).

Common Response No. 1: According to the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(b), CEQA requires that in the response to comments in a Final EIR, “The written response shall describe the disposition of significant environmental issues raised (e.g., revisions to the proposed project to mitigate anticipated impacts or objections)”. In addition, Section 15204.5(a) states, “When responding to comments, lead agencies need only respond to significant environmental issues and do not need to provide all information requested by reviewers, as long as a good faith effort at full disclosure is made in the EIR.”
As described in Chapter 3.0 of the Draft EIR, the proposed project includes the adoption of the new General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City of Long Beach (City) Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80). The Noise Element is a vision document that will guide Long Beach's long-term planning decisions, holistic approach to ambient noise, and provide a framework for general policies including special events. At the request of the Long Beach City Council, the City also prepared a Special Events Noise Study, as a separate effort from the Noise Element Update. As described in Section 3.3.3, this Special Events Noise Study was released to the public on July 17, 2019, and outlined best practices for Special Events noise management. The categorization of Special Events as “temporary” is a planning decision made by the City outside of the general guidelines and policies provided in the Draft Noise Element and analyzed in the Draft EIR. Furthermore, the Draft EIR explains that due to the temporary and often seasonal nature of these events, and the fact that these events require approval through a permitting process, they are not considered representative of typical noise patterns that contribute to the existing ambient noise setting. Special events include a wide range of specific locations, time periods, sound amplification equipment, number of attendees, and other equipment that contribute to a wide range of potential noise levels. Due to the inconsistent natures of these events, regardless of frequency, these events are not considered stationary sources that can be regulated based on static criteria. Rather, each event is regulated according to its temporary and unique characteristics through the special events

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -2 permitting process. As described on Page 4.2-31 of the Draft EIR, stationary noise sources could include outdoor speakers; however, stationary noise sources considered in the Draft EIR are permanently installed and assume ongoing use. The operations from permanent stationary sources can be considered part of the existing ambient noise setting. The Draft EIR correctly analyzes the project design strategies proposed by the project and the related amendments to the Noise Ordinance that would ensure exterior and interior noise standards are set relative to applicable land uses in relation to truly stationary noise sources that can be monitored and regulated, resulting in a less than significant impact. As stationary noise sources identified in the Draft EIR would result in less than significant impacts, no mitigation is required.

Furthermore, the Draft EIR is compliant with the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines (2017), which specifically requests that the noise element analyze and quantify, to the extent feasible, noise from the following sources: highways and freeways; primary arterials and major local streets, passenger and freight rail and ground rapid transit; aviation, military, and other facilities related to airport operations; industrial plants; and other stationary sources identified by local agencies that contribute to the noise environment. However, the Draft Noise Element does establish general strategies and policies that help minimize noise impacts, including those that occur on a periodic basis, such as those from special events (Strategy No. 13).

As described above, the City does not identify short-term, temporary, and seasonal special events as stationary noise sources that consist of typical noise patterns and contribute to the existing ambient noise setting. Therefore, the City will consider the comments provided; however, comments related to the categorization of Special Events do not comment on the adequacy of the analysis provided in the Draft EIR.

Several comments also requested additional citizen participation for the Special Events permitting process. As stated in the Draft EIR, Policy N 13-2 states that the City’s policy is to provide an efficient and standardized process for special events permitting in order to increase predictability for residents and applicants. In 2017–2018, a variety of public engagement strategies were employed as part of the Noise Element update, including a significant online outreach component, “Listen Up Long Beach”, a crowd-sourced digital mapping tool for the community to report on local noise issues. Additionally, multiple stakeholder meetings and focus groups were held, and media outreach was conducted via Facebook and Twitter. Feedback gathered from these engagements was included in the Noise Element Existing Conditions Report, released in March 2018. As part of the Special Events Noise Study described above, Development Services staff facilitated focus groups to discuss Special Events and Outdoor Noise at meetings on October 17, 2018. Additionally, Development Services staff supported the City Special Events and Filming team at a public open house on September 26, 2019, for their Special Events Noise Study. City staff will consider the comment and request for additional citizen participation in the permitting process when developing the implementation approach for Policy N 13-2; however, this comment is not a comment on the contents, analysis, or adequacy of the Draft EIR and does not require a response pursuant to CEQA.

Common Comment No. 2: Several comments also request that standards for noise limits be added to the Draft Noise Element in Appendix B as shown in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 of the Draft EIR; commenters also request the inclusion of these tables in the Draft Noise Element as a means of providing enforcement for Special Events (as described below in Common Response No. 2, these

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-3 tables do not correspond to Special Events noise; Special Events noise is regulated and enforced by the City Department of Health and Human Services through the City’s review during each Special Events permit application process). Comments on the standards for noise limits also included concerns related to the noise standards for various PlaceTypes in the City.

Common Response No. 2: Tables 3.2 and 3.3 of the Draft EIR provide proposed updates to the current Long Beach Municipal Code Section 8.80.160 for Exterior noise limits and Section 8.80.170 for Interior noise limits. These updates are a part of the proposed project, although the Draft Noise Element itself does not update the Noise Ordinance and Municipal Code. The Draft Noise Element appropriately does not include these tables as the purpose of the General Plan Noise Element is to establish goals and policies related to noise, while the Municipal Code and Noise Ordinance establish the actual noise limits for non-transportation related sources and can be updated without creating the need for a General Plan Amendment. Section 3.4.4 of the Final EIR has been revised to clarify “Chapter 8.80, Noise, establishes exterior and interior noise limits for the generation of nontransportation related sound within the City.” Unlike Tables 3.2 and 3.3, Table 3.1 would not update the Noise Ordinance or Municipal Code, but rather provide limits for transportation sources as part of the Noise Plan and is therefore included in the Draft Noise Element. The Draft Noise Element includes policies that require compliance with the Noise Ordinance, either current or as amended.

Furthermore, as described in Project Design Feature (PDF) 4.1.1, amendments to the Municipal Code are included as part of the proposed project to ensure that changes facilitated by the adopted Noise Element are consistent with the Municipal Code.

PlaceTypes were adopted by the City as part of the General Plan Land Use Element and Urban Design Element (LUE/UDE) adopted in 2019; the LUE/UDE Project included a project design feature requiring that the City implement a Zone Change Program designed to resolve any zone change inconsistencies within 5 years of project approval. Therefore, designations of PlaceTypes and zoning are not part of the proposed project and comments related to these adopted land use regulations do not comment on the adequacy of the analysis in this Draft EIR. The proposed Noise Districts identified in the Draft EIR correspond to the previously adopted LUE Placetypes and thus are needed for consistency with the adopted LUE. The proposed update to the Noise District Map expands District Two boundaries to better capture areas that currently are characterized by mixed-use development or are planned for mixed-uses and commercial uses in the future, as established by the adopted LUE. The proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance include adding Mixed Use as a land use type in Table A in Section 8.80.160 and Table C in Section 8.80.170 of the City’s Municipal Code, with the corresponding maximum allowable daytime and nighttime decibel levels shown in Table 3.2, Exterior Noise Limits, and Table 3.3, Interior Noise Limits. These proposed amendments to the tables are needed for consistency with proposed amendments to the Noise District Map. These proposed amendments incorporate mixed uses while maintaining the existing standards for indoor and outdoor noise limits for all other districts including residential and other noise-sensitive land uses such as schools. The No Project alternative would increase project-related land use impacts because no changes to the current General Plan or Municipal Code would occur, resulting in inconsistencies between the Draft Noise Element, Noise Ordinance, and the adopted LUE. These inconsistencies would conflict with State recommendations provided by the State Office of the Attorney General related to the updating of General Plans. Furthermore, without approving the proposed project and adopting the Draft Noise Element, there is the potential for greater project-

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -4 related noise impacts because new strategies and policies in the proposed Noise Element aimed at minimizing noise impacts would not be adopted. The strategies and policies established by the proposed project would reduce potential impacts related to incompatible land uses and noise, and would promote a healthy noise environment in the City.

Common Comment No. 3: Comments were also provided regarding the City’s noise insulation standards in habitable rooms with doors and windows closed. The comments raised concerns regarding the lack of air conditioning in older buildings that may inhibit the ability to keep windows closed during certain times of the year.

Common Response No. 3: As described in Section 4.2.5.2 in the Draft EIR, these standards are based on the requirements of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24. Therefore, the City will consider the comments provided; however, comments related to the interior noise insulation standards demonstrate concern regarding existing State regulations and the state of existing, older buildings, but do not comment on the adequacy of the analysis provided in the Draft EIR.

Common Comment No. 4: Several comments cited Section 46000 of the California Health and Safety Code related to excessive noise as a hazard to public health.

Common Response No. 4: California Noise Law Section 46000 provides overarching policies at the State level that are incorporated by the City in their creation of their own goals and policies related to noise regulations. As stated in Section 4.2.7 of the Draft EIR, the proposed Noise Element includes strategies and policies that are intended to provide protection for land uses from excessive noise and vibration sources, as well as to implement the vision of a healthy, livable noise environment in the City, consistent with the guidance in Section 46000. In addition, as with other laws and regulations enforced by other agencies that protect public health and safety, the City, as the lead agency, has the authority other than CEQA to require measures to protect public health and safety.

Furthermore, the A-weighted scale is the weighting scale most commonly used for Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulatory measurements and is therefore used throughout the analysis in the Draft EIR for the analysis of noise-related impacts to public health.

The C-weighted scale is not considered in this analysis because the types of sound pressure most appropriately measured by the C-weighted scale are not typical of the ambient noise environment.

While the C-weighted scale may be used for special events with low frequency noise, those events are not analyzed in the Draft EIR as part of the ambient noise setting, due to their temporary nature and varying noise characteristics. Section 46000 is also cited in the Regulatory Setting for the Special Events Noise Study (2019) prepared by the City as a separate process from the Draft Noise Element Draft EIR. Therefore, the City will consider the comments provided; however, the Draft EIR appropriately uses the A-weighted scale to address health concerns for noise impacts.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-5

2.2 LOCAL AGENCIES

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -6 This page intentionally left blank
DOC 6168416.D0102030819
May 6, 2021
Ref. DOC 6119570
Ms. Jennifer Ly, Planner
City of Long Beach
Department of Development Services
Planning Bureau
333 West Ocean Boulevard, 5th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dear Ms. Ly:

DEIR Response Letter for Long Beach
General Plan Noise Element and Amendments to the City's Noise Ordinance The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (Districts) received a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the subject project on March 23, 2021. The City of Long Beach (City) is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8, and 19. We offer the following comment:
• 4.19 UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS, page 4-51, Wastewater – Wastewater generated in the City is treated at either the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant located in the City of Carson, which has a capacity of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) and currently processes an average flow of 259.7 mgd, or the Long Beach Water Reclamation Plant, which has a capacity of 25 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 11.9 mgd.

All other information concerning Districts’ facilities and sewerage service contained in the document is current. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2717 or at [email protected].

Very truly yours,
Adriana Raza
Customer Service Specialist
Facilities Planning Department
AR:ar

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -8

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
LETTER CODE: L-1
DATE: May 6, 2021
RESPONSE L-1-1
The comment states that the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (Districts) received the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project on March 23, 2021. The comment also states that the City of Long Beach is within the jurisdictional boundaries of District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8, and 19.

This comment is introductory in nature and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. No further response is necessary.

RESPONSE L-1-2
The comment references Page 4-51 of the Draft EIR and states that wastewater generated in the City is treated at either the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant located in the City of Carson, which has a capacity of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) and currently processes an average flow of 259.7 mgd, or the Long Beach Water Reclamation Plant, which has a capacity of 25 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 11.9 mgd.

This comment clarifies information provided in the Initial Study (Appendix A) for the discussion of Utilities and Service Systems. While this clarification is noted, as stated on Page 2-13 of the Draft EIR in Section 2.4, Effects Found Not to be Significant, approval of the proposed project is the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element, which does not include or facilitate improvements that would impact wastewater facilities. Therefore, no revisions or further analysis are required.

RESPONSE L-1-3
The comment states that all other information concerning the Sanitation Districts’ facilities and service is current and provides contact information for questions.

This comment does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. No further response is necessary.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: LBUSD Comments to DEIR for the Noise Element (SCH NO. 2019050009) Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:35:46 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
210614_LBUSD Comments to DEIR Noise Element.pdf
For LSA
From: Tracy Nishihira <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 10:33 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Cc: David Miranda <[email protected]>
Subject: LBUSD Comments to DEIR for the Noise Element (SCH NO. 2019050009) -EXTERNALGood afternoon,
Please find attached the Long Beach Unified School District’s comments following review of the Draft EIR for the General Plan Noise Element.

Thank you,
Tracy Nishihira, AIA
Interim Planning Administrator
Long Beach USD – Facilities Development & Planning
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 562-997-7550 | Cell: 310-339-2507
The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-11

LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
LETTER CODE: L-2
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE L-2-1
This comment is an introductory email that explains that the Long Beach Unified School District’s (LBUSD) comments can be found in the provided attachment.

This comment is introductory and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR); does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. No further response is necessary.

RESPONSE L-2-2
The comment expresses LBUSD’s appreciation for the opportunity to comment and states that their primary concern to review the Draft EIR to distinguish if all potential noise impacts are properly addressed, analyzed, and mitigated to assure an environment conducive to learning.

Specific comments on the Draft EIR and analysis are provided in the following comments below.

RESPONSE L-2-3
The comment cites the Draft EIR conclusion that construction noise impacts would be less than significant with adherence to the interior and exterior noise standards under the City’s existing Municipal Code. The comment states excessive construction noise, although short-term in nature, could be a nuisance as well as a distraction to effective outdoor and indoor instruction. As such, the level of significance associated with construction noise, vibration, and stationary noise sources should be based on a project-specific noise study. Additionally, vibration activities in excess of allowable levels on school properties should be limited to hours when school is not in session, not just outside early morning hours.

Regarding the request for project-specific noise studies to determine the significance of construction and stationary noise levels as well as construction-related vibration, it is currently a requirement of both CEQA and the City to analyze all project impacts to surrounding sensitive uses from both shortterm construction noise and vibration as well as long-term stationary noise and vibration sources during the review process for all discretionary projects. As the proposed project is a policy/planning action and does not include or facilitate physical improvements or development, a project-specific noise study is not appropriate as future project details and plans are not available. However, project-specific noise studies would be prepared for future discretionary projects proposed that would result in potential impacts related to construction and/or operational noise. While regulations associated with vibration impacts to schools are not specifically described in the Draft Noise Element EIR or the current version of the Draft Noise Element, Policy N 12-2 requires the City

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -12 to “Limit the allowable hours for construction activities and maintenance operations near sensitive uses” and Section 4.2.4.2 of the Draft EIR expressly lists schools as a noise-sensitive receptor that would be considered through this policy.

RESPONSE L-2-4
The comment cites Proposed Noise Element Strategy No. 12 Policy N 12-5 and states that notices should be provided to all noise-sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a construction site, not just residential units. Notices should also be provided to all properties if construction noise exceeds acceptable noise standards at that property. Furthermore, if exceedance of noise levels occurs at a school, LBUSD requests that the City and/or project applicant coordinate with LBUSD's Facilities Branch to avoid construction activities during testing periods.

This comment will be forwarded to the City decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process. Further, City staff will consider the comment and request for additional noticing for construction in their determination for the proper implementation of Policy N 12-5; additional requests regarding implementation of this proposed policy do not comment on the adequacy of the analysis provided in the Draft EIR. No further response is necessary.

RESPONSE L-2-5
The comment concludes the letter and provides contact information for the LBUSD office.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-13

2.3 INTERESTED PARTIES

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -14 This page intentionally left blank
From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Shelby Cramton
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Noise Element Comments
Date: Thursday, May 13, 2021 12:36:57 PM
For LSA
From: Pat Welch <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 1:42 AM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Noise Element Comments
-EXTERNALThe Noise Element seeks to exempt Special Events from some requirements on the basis that they are non-recurring.

This assumption is incorrect based on past experience. Waterford residences are exposed to Special Events almost every weekend, and sometimes two events on a weekend. Foot races can start blaring PA systems as early as 4:30am. Concerts can go to midnight.

The Element also specifies that resident measurements should be taken indoors with the windows closed. Residents can presumably run the air conditioner during the summer.

Another false assumption. Most residents in our older buildings do not have air conditioning.

Furthermore, running the air conditioner when you could otherwise open the windows and enjoy the cool ocean breezes is contrary to the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan which wants residents to minimize their carbon footprint.

Thanks,
Pat Welch 310-367-0595
Virus-free. www.avg.com

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -16

PAT WELCH
LETTER CODE: I-1
DATE: May 13, 2021
RESPONSE I-1-1
The comment states that the Draft Noise Element seeks to exempt Special Events from some requirements on the basis they are non-reoccurring, but the commenter disagrees with this assumption.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-1-2
The comment states that noise measurements taken indoors with the windows closed assumes residents can run the air conditioner during the summer, but states that most residents in their building do not have air conditioning. In addition, the comment states that running the air conditioner is contrary to the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, which encourages residents to minimize their carbon footprint.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of noise measurement standards. While the commenter is correct that reducing the use of air conditioning equipment will also reduce emissions, the City of Long Beach’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan does not prohibit the use of air conditioners, and states that the reduction of emissions can be achieved through various personal actions, such as decreasing reliance on personal motor vehicles.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Noise Element EIR
Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 11:45:33 PM
For LSA
From: RAE GABELICH <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 1:45 AM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Cc: Al Austin <[email protected]>; Jonathan Kraus <[email protected]>; Suzie Price <[email protected]>; Stacy Mungo <[email protected]>; Council District 4 <[email protected]>; Council District 7 <[email protected]>; RAE GABELICH <[email protected]>; Council District 6 <[email protected]> Subject: Noise Element EIR
-EXTERNALRe: Updating the Noise Element of the General Plan I would like to see a section of this updated document include the use of gas powered leaf blowers on residential properties.

The noise from some of these machines is a daily disturbance across our city. I understand large properties such as golf courses, parks and parkways, but not residential homes.

Personally speaking, six days a week, at 7:45a.m., a homeowner across from my home has their maintenance crew blowing their entire property. This noise can last as long as 2 hours because of the size of their lot. It appears they have one very large messy tree that they do not want to see the leaves and berries on their lanais or driveway. As a result, homes within .25 mile must listen to this nearly 300 days per year.

With today's technology I would like to see our city require that the use of gas powered units, that go above a certain decibel level, be banned in Long Beach. There are surrounding cities that do ban them citywide. Let's take that next step and find a quieter way to maintain our neighborhoods.

Since Long Beach is still working on updating our General Plan that has not been changed since 1975, we are due for some serious adjustments that impact each and every neighborhood.

Thank you for your consideration!
Rae Gabelich

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -18

RAE GABELICH
LETTER CODE: I-2
DATE: June 8, 2021
RESPONSE I-2-1
The comment requests the inclusion of gas powered leaf blowers on residential properties as a daily noise disturbance for residences. The comment further requests gas powered units above a certain decibel level be banned.

Operations associated with equipment such as leaf blowers are regulated by the City of Long Beach (City) Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80). While policies have been included in the City’s Draft Noise Element to minimize stationary source operations, specific restrictions regarding operations to leaf blowers are not provided within the Draft Noise Element.

Therefore, comments related to the operations of gas-powered leaf blowers do not comment on the adequacy of the analysis provided in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This comment will be forwarded to the City decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Comments Regarding Noise & EIR
Date: Friday, June 11, 2021 2:21:18 PM
For LSA
From: Mark Breslin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 9:11 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Comments Regarding Noise & EIR
-EXTERNALWhile some residents may have concerns related to events and programs in the vicinity, it is our view that as residents choosing to live in an urban, vital and culturally rich environment, it comes with the territory. The City of Long Beach continues to become a destination for top line entertainment, events and programs and to limit these due to seasonal noise issues seems shortsighted and frankly NIMBYism that does not account for the community at large.

Every event is not too my liking. All the music is not my favorite. Sounds of the beach and city sometime might be intrusive, but choosing to live on Alamitos Beach (3rd floor right on the beach) and expecting whispers of palm fronds to be the predominant soundscape is unrealistic. We support the events, programs and the sound that comes with it.

Mark Breslin / Karen Marasigan
850 East Ocean # 305
Long Beach CA

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -20

MARK BRESLIN
LETTER CODE: I-3
DATE: June 11, 2021
RESPONSE I-3-1
The comment states that the commenter’s support for events and programs in the City and the associated sound related to these events and programs.

This comment expresses general support for the proposed project and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR); does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The comment is noted and no further response is necessary.

June 14, 2021
Planning Bureau, City of Long Beach Development Services, Long Beach, CA 90802 [email protected] Attention, Jennifer Ly
Re: The current EIR draft: Amplified noise from city-permitted outdoor entertainment on the beach Dear Ms. Ly:

I object to the current Environmental Impact Report (EIR) draft classifying the city-permitted outdoor entertainment with excessive amplified sound on the beach front venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center parking lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Marina Green as temporary.

Given that these events happen repeatedly spring, summer, and fall with noise levels up to and exceeding 90 dBA, up to 12 hours a day, 3 days in a row, year after year, they are not temporary. They are, in fact, a Stationary Noise Source.

The amplified noise from these events made my home at 850 East Ocean Blvd unlivable, making objects on shelves shake. I and my neighbors documented the noise level from these events and repeatedly shared the information with the city and asked the city to control the amplified noise. Rather than protecting us as required by California Noise law 46000, the city increased the frequency of these events. In an effort to stay in the home I loved, I installed triple pane windows in my home. It was still unlivable during these events. The sound reverberated in my unit, frequently forcing me to leave my home for days at a time.

The current Noise Element draft states on page 34 that, “Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than 85 dBA. [and] . . prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increase[s] body tensions and thereby affect[s] blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system. . . . extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA would results in permanent damage.” It also states on page 35 that nighttime disturbances--such as the disturbances from setting up and taking down the entertainment facilities--is also a health threat, especially to senior citizens.

I lost hearing in my right ear during the time I lived on East Ocean Blvd. I and the majority of people living in the high-rise buildings on East Ocean are senior citizens.

As a senior citizen with diabetes, this situation forced me at great inconvenience and financial loss to move since the city’s behavior indicated it was not planning to protect its residents. Until the city corrects this situation, it will be difficult for me to forgive the city for knowingly violating my right to live in my home without the intrusion of city-permitted excessive, amplified noise which was a hazard to my health.

I urge the city to correct this unacceptable situation by reclassifying Special Events and all other citypermitted events in these beach-front venues as a Stationary Noise Source and controlling the amplified noise level from these events by the time it reaches the adjacent high-density buildings on East Ocean Blvd.

Sincerely,
Claire Heiss
Formerly 850 East Ocean Blvd, Unit 1309, Long Beach. Currently 104 Kingfisher Ct., Long Beach Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -22

CLAIRE HEISS
LETTER CODE: I-4
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-4-1
The comment states the commenter’s objection to the Draft EIR’s classification of city-permitted outdoor entertainment with amplified sound on beachfront venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green as temporary. The comment further states that given the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources rather than temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-4-2
The comment states that the amplified noise results in shaking shelves and states that they have measured the noise levels and shared this information with the City. The commenter also cites California Noise Law 46000 and states that the City has increased the frequency of events. The comment further states that the sound has forced the commenter to leave their home for days at a time.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion on California Noise Law 46000 of the Health and Safety Code. This comment will be forwarded to the City of Long Beach decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

RESPONSE I-4-3
The comment cites the Noise Element draft discussion on damage to human hearing at prolonged noise exposure and states that the Noise Element draft also cites nighttime disturbances as a health threat. The comment concludes that the city-permitted excessive amplified noise is a hazard to their health.

Please refer to Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of noise and public health. This comment will be forwarded to the City decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

RESPONSE I-4-4
The comment requests Special Events and all other city-permitted events in beachfront venues be reclassified as Stationary Noise Sources and that the noise level of these events be controlled for impacts to adjacent high-density buildings on East Ocean Boulevard.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

June 14, 2021
Planning Bureau, City of Long Beach Development Services, Long Beach, CA 90802 [email protected], Attn: Jennifer Ly, Planner Re: The current Noise Element draft: Amplified sound from city permitted entertainment on the Beach Dear Ms. Ly:

I object to the absence in the current Noise Element draft of enforceable noise standards for the amplified noise from city-permitted outdoor entertainment on Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center parking lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Marina Green permitted by the Department of Special Events and the Convention Center. While these venues have separate names, they are adjacent to each other and constitute one acoustic environment. They are also adjacent to seven high-density, high-rise residential buildings. Given that the city repeatedly permits outdoor entertainment with amplified noise spring, summer, and fall with noise levels up to and exceeding 90 dBA, up to 12 hours a day, 3 days in a row, year after year, to the people who live adjacent to these venues, these Special Events are not temporary. They are a Stationary Noise Source and need to be controlled to comply with California Noise Law 46000.

The current Noise Element draft states on page 34 that, “Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than 85 dBA. [and] . . . prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increase[s] body tensions and thereby affect[s] blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system. . . . extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA would results in permanent damage.” In the same document, on page 35, it states that nighttime disturbances--such as the disturbances from setting up and taking down the entertainment facilities--is also a health threat, especially to senior citizens.

I lost hearing in my right ear during the time I lived on East Ocean Blvd. I and the majority of people living in the high-rise buildings on East Ocean are senior citizens.

Yet, there is nothing in the current Noise Element draft that protects people living adjacent to these beach-front venues from city-permitted, excessive amplified noise by the time the noise reaches their homes.

As a senior citizen with diabetes, this situation forced me at great inconvenience and financial loss to move since, despite our repeated pleas to the city to control the amplified noise, the city’s behavior indicated it was not planning to protect its residents. Until the city corrects this situation, it will be difficult for me to forgive the city for knowingly violating my right to live in my home without the intrusion of city-permitted excessive, amplified noise which was a hazard to my health.

I urge the city to correct this unacceptable situation by including healthy, enforceable noise standards for amplified noise from city-permitted outdoor entertainment adjacent to the residences on East Ocean Blvd downtown by the time the noise reaches the residences.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -24

CLAIRE HEISS
LETTER CODE: I-5
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-5-1
The comment states the commenter’s objection to the Draft EIR’s classification of city-permitted outdoor entertainment with amplified sound on beachfront venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green as temporary. The comment further states that given their proximity to each other, these venues should be considered one acoustic environment. Lastly, the comment states that due to the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources rather than temporary and need to comply with California Noise Law 46000.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. for a discussion on California Noise Law 46000 of the Health and Safety Code.

RESPONSE I-5-2
The comment cites the Noise Element draft discussion on damage to human hearing at prolonged noise exposure and states that the Noise Element draft also cites nighttime disturbances as a health threat. The comment concludes that the current Noise Element draft does not include any protections for people living adjacent to these beach front venues and city-permitted excessive amplified noise is a hazard to their health.

Please refer to Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of noise and public health. This comment will be forwarded to the City of Long Beach decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

RESPONSE I-5-3
The comment urges the City to include healthy, enforceable noise standards for amplified noise from city-permitted outdoor entertainment adjacent to residences on East Ocean Boulevard.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: OCEAN RESIDENT: NOISE EIR REVIEW COMMENTS
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 12:35:55 PM
For LSA
From: Deb Gabaldon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 7:08 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: OCEAN RESIDENT: NOISE EIR REVIEW COMMENTS
-EXTERNALSubject: OCEAN RESIDENT: NOISE EIR REVIEW COMMENTS June 14, 2021
City of Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau Long Beach, CA 90802
Email: [email protected]
Attn: Jennifer Ly, Planner
Review of the Draft Noise Element, December 2019
Dear Ms. Ly:

The following are my concerns:
·
The City-owned Special Events area incorporating Alamitos Beach, Marina Green, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Convention Center parking should be considered a single entity subject to the Noise Ordinance requirements.

Special Events are held weekly between April and October. These are not "temporary" events as described in the EIR, but are a "Stationary Noise Source" that requires mitigation by the State of California. ·
Consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.
·
The current Noise Ordinance requirement to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) must remain in place.
·
Noise limits are missing from the document. Tables 3.2. and 3.3 from the EIR (March 2021) need to be added. Without stated noise limits, enforcement is not possible.

We have code and regulations that address noise emanating from motorcycles, loud pipes, and fireworks.I would like to see some discussion of responsibility and enforcement needed to keep residents safe from the noise that may be a hazard to our mutual health and welfare.

Debra Winter
411 W Seaside Way, #1403
Long Beach CA 90802
cc:

Robert Garcia, Mayor
Cindy Allen, 2nd District Councilwoman
Tom Modica, City Manager
Kelly Colopy, Director, Department of Health and Human Services

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-27

DEBRA WINTER
LETTER CODE: I-6
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-6-1
The comment states that the City-owned Special Events area incorporating Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green should be considered a single entity subject to the Noise Ordinance requirements. The comment further states that given the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources rather than temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-6-2
The comment requests the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-6-3
The comment states that the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) must remain in place.

This requirement is present in the current Noise Ordinance and is not proposed to be revised under the proposed project. While other potential changes to the Municipal Code and Noise Ordinance are described, the proposed changes to the Municipal Code and Noise Ordinance are appropriately not included in the Draft Noise Element. The Noise Element, as part of the General Plan, is a long-term policy document while the Noise Ordinance and Municipal Code are the tools used to establish and enforce noise limits and can be revised as necessary without amending the General Plan. Therefore, the Draft Noise Element includes policies that require compliance with the Noise Ordinance, either current or as amended. This comment will be forwarded to the City of Long Beach decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

RESPONSE I-6-4
The comment states noise limits are missing from the document and Tables 3.2 and 3.3 from the EIR need to be added for enforcement of stated noise limits.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the relation of the tables provided in the Draft EIR for proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance in relation to the Draft Noise Element.

RESPONSE I-6-5
The comment requests a discussion of responsibility and enforcement to keep residents safe from noise that may be hazardous to health and welfare.

Please refer to Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of noise and public health.

June 14, 2021
City of Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau Long Beach, CA 90802
Email: [email protected]
Attn: Jennifer Ly, Planner
Review of the Draft Noise Element, December 2019
Dear Ms. Ly:

Thank you very much for the opportunity to review the draft Noise Element. All Long Beach citizens are entitled to an environment without intrusions of noise which may be hazardous to their health or welfare. As a resident of the downtown waterfront, my review of the draft Noise Element has brought about the following areas of concern:

These are as communicated to you by the president of ORCA, I strongly support the position of ORCA on this matter.
• Noise limits are missing from the document. Tables 3.2. and 3.3 from the EIR (March 2021) need to be added. Without stated noise limits, enforcement is not possible.
• Indoor noise measurements need to be made with windows in the seasonal (usually open in summer) position. This is the current Noise Ordinance requirement--do not change it! Waterfront homes were built to be cooled by ocean breezes.
• Include a resident's representative in the Special Events permitting process.

Many other cities have a review board for special events that has resident membership.
• Ensure that Special Events conducted near homes adjacent to Alamitos Beach, Marina Green, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Convention Center parking lot are subject to the Noise Ordinance requirements. My home is rattled with excessive amplified noise every weekend between April and October. These are not "temporary" events as described in the EIR, but are a "Stationary Noise Source" that requires mitigation by the State of California.

In addition to the ORCA statements, I am disappointed to say that to my way of thinking the city is not acting in good faith in this matter. The report is very professionally prepared, indeed one might say slick, but the true heart for residents is not there. I do not hear the city asking a core question of how loud do events need to be for the ticket holders to enjoy the music or other sound? Rather, why does the question seem to be, how loud can we permit without getting serious residential pushback? Or, as a resident of this area since I started working at LBCC as a counselor in 1976 (a long time resident), I wonder, is one goal of many of these events and sound systems to make the sound as loud as possible with new technology and heard across the area, because they can? Much of the hurtful behavior in our cities these days may be because an individual says, I will do this (ie hit and run, road rage, shootings, loud cars, scooters zooming down the sidewalk, etc.) because I CAN. As for me, sure I am willing to compromise, but it is abhorrent that the city would try to get around the law by calling the events temporary; every negation of people’s human rights can be called temporary but temporary they are not. A vibrant urban area does not need to be a cesspool of noise pollution that we will live to regret as the true effects become better researched and documented. Is this what Long Beach will come to be known for?
Please know that all hard work and your consideration of my views is deeply appreciated.

Remember you have great power.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth and Sandra Stepan
525 E Seaside Way
Long Beach, CA
cc:

Robert Garcia, Mayor
Cindy Allen, 2nd District Councilwoman
Tom Modica, City Manager
Kelly Colopy, Director, Department of Health and Human Services Jim Goodin, President ORCA

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -30

ELIZABETH & SANDRA STEPAN
LETTER CODE: I-7
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-7-1
The comment thanks the City for the opportunity to review the Draft Noise Element and provides introductory remarks for specific concerns provided in the following comments.

RESPONSE I-7-2
The comment states noise limits are missing from the document and Tables 3.2 and 3.3 from the EIR need to be added for enforcement of stated noise limits.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the relation of the tables provided in the Draft EIR for proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance in relation to the Draft Noise Element.

RESPONSE I-7-3
The comment states that the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) must remain in place.

Please refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

RESPONSE I-7-4
The comment requests the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-7-5
The comment states that the Special Events near homes adjacent to Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green should be subject to the Noise Ordinance requirements. The comment further states that given the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources rather than temporary that require mitigation.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-31 RESPONSE I-7-6
The comment provides concluding statements about the commenter’s disappointment in the classification of events being called temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Resent with signature: DRAFT NOISE ELEMENT Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 1:54:46 PM
For LSA
From: Heidi Maerker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 8:52 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Resent with signature: DRAFT NOISE ELEMENT -EXTERNALResent with correct email
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Heidi Maerker <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2021
Subject: Resent with signature: DRAFT NOISE ELEMENT
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
June 9, 2021
City of Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau Long Beach, CA 90802
Email: [email protected]
Attn: Jennifer Ly, Planner
Dear Ms. Ly and City officials,
As I even begin to write this email, I'm dismayed and disheartened. I think why bother? Who is listening? We have had severe noise problems in downtown Long Beach for well over five years, and nothing has changed. I know you all have heard the many complaints, but continue to ignore and not address them.

I've lived in the Villa Riviera for over 30 years. I love Long Beach and have been a big, huge supporter of our Mayor. This has changed, because his governance has changed.

We are used to significant, large, noisy events and used to look forward to them. Grand Prix and Gay Pride were events the whole city embraced and participated in. Now, we have loud, noisy, disruptive events almost every single weekend.

It's not sustainable or affordable for homeowners to leave town every weekend. Why should we? We were here to support, invest and shop in the downtown area when no one else would.

The city and its leaders continue to declare these weekly events as "special events" or "temporary events" and continue to book them without any noise mitigation, despite the fact that there is real harm you're doing to your community members, is a slap in the face.

We can't talk on the phone, watch tv, or drive down the street during these events. As a result, stress and anxiety levels are up for us and our pets.

Couple the decibel ratings with chronic noise from amplified motorcycles, cars, and the fireworks that go for weeks; I'm not exaggerating to say, it's like living in a war zone.

Buildings are built with no designated parking spots, resulting in gridlock throughout the city.

I'm told my building, and The Pacific are zoned as commercial properties. Why? Clearly, we are both residential buildings. This makes it easier for you to do workarounds and limit culpability? Again, without regard to those that live here.

The phrase "treat others like you'd like to be treated" is applicable here. How would you like to live like this for months at a time? Stay at my house during these high decibel events and tell me how you like it. But, of course, I won't be able to hear you.

Please do something to protect us and our right to live a peaceful life.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Heidi Maerker
800 E. Ocean Blvd.

Long Beach, CA 90802
cc:

Robert Garcia, Mayor
Cindy Allen, 2nd District Councilwoman
Tom Modica, City Manager
Kelly Colopy, Director, Department of Health and Human Services

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-35

HEIDI MAERKER
LETTER CODE: I-8
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-8-1
The comment provides introductory remarks and states concerns on severe noise problems in downtown Long Beach. Specific comments are provided in the following comments.

RESPONSE I-8-2
The comment states that significant, large, noise events are now almost every weekend and these events categorized as “special events” or “temporary events” are booked without noise mitigation.

The comment further states it is not sustainable or feasible to leave town and the noise results in stress and anxiety for residents.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events. This comment will be forwarded to the City of Long Beach (City) decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

RESPONSE I-8-3
The comment states that the decibel ratings with chronic noise amplified from motorcycles, cars, and fireworks is like living in a war zone.

As stated in the Draft Noise Element (Appendix B), the California Department of Motor Vehicles has jurisdiction over vehicle noise emissions within California. California Motor Vehicle Code Section 23130 establishes vehicle noise limits for moving vehicles, including interstate trucks that operate on streets, highways and freeways within the state, and regulates noise impacts on adjacent land uses. The provisions are enforced by the California Highway Patrol and local law enforcement agencies, such as the Long Beach Police Department. Additionally, the current Draft Noise Element has established Policy N 6-7 which states: “Enforce regulations that address noise generated by motorcycles and support education efforts to create awareness and encourage compliance (such as posting signs along Ocean Boulevard)”. Lastly, issues related to parking within the City are covered in the City’s Mobility Element of the General Plan are not applicable to the Draft EIR for the Noise Element.

RESPONSE I-8-4
The comment questions the zoning of their residence as a commercial property.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -36 Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the process for determining land use types, zoning districts, and corresponding noise districts.

RESPONSE I-8-5
The comment provides concluding comments requesting the City do something to protect residents.

This comment is conclusory and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. No further response is necessary.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Subject: Fw: Comments to the Noise EIR and the Noise Element Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 11:40:15 AM
Attachments: Noise Element EIR 2021 Review--JG.pdf
Noise Element 2019 Review--JG.pdf
For LSA
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 6:28 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Cc: Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Comments to the Noise EIR and the Noise Element -EXTERNALThis email has been resent. The original had a bad address. -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Jun 14, 2021 10:45 am
Subject: Comments to the Noise EIR and the Noise Element Attached are my review comments to the Draft Noise Element EIR, dated March 2021, and the Draft Noise Element, dated December 2019.

The thrust of my comments are that Special Event entertainment conducted on the waterfront need to be regulated by the Noise EIR, the Noise Element, and the Noise Ordinance. These Special Events conducted every weekend are not "temporary" as classified by the EIR but are a "Stationary Noise Source" that requires mitigation pursuant to the State of California General Plan Guidelines, dated 2017.

To the residents that live adjacent to these venues, the events are continuous and a source of undue distress.

Thank you for accepting my input,
James A. Goodin, DPA
600 E. Ocean Blvd, #600

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -46

JAMES GOODIN
LETTER CODE: I-9
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-9-1
The comment provides introductory statements for specific comment provided below. The comment summarizes their concerns are related to the classification of Special Events as temporary and states that they are Stationary Noise Sources that require mitigation.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-2
The comment states the commenter’s general concern related to Special Event noise and health hazards. The comment states noise from Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green makes adjacent homes unlivable often. The comment further states amplified noise at these adjacent homes exceeds noise levels permitted in the City’s industrial areas.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-3
The comment states that the outdoor events classified as temporary are continuous and given the repeat nature of these events, these should be considered Stationary Noise Sources that require mitigation rather than temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-4
The comment cites the list of concerns provided in the Draft EIR on Page 1-4, Areas of Controversy, and on Page 2-3, Scoping Meeting Summary, and requests a roadmap for where the concerns are addressed throughout the document.

The list of concerns provided in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on Pages 1-4 and 2-3 can also be found in each technical section under the discussion of the scoping process. As described in Sections 4.2.1 and 4.3.1, the concerns raised during the scoping process are related to Special Events noise, which is not analyzed in the Draft EIR for the new Noise Element and proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance. Therefore, these concerns are adequately addressed in the Draft EIR through the explanation that these concerns are outside the scope for the environmental analysis for the Draft Noise Element. Furthermore, in Section 4.1.1, concerns related to Noise Districts are cited and the reader is referred to Section 4.1.8 in the document that explains the establishment of acoustical neighborhoods would not be consistent with the adopted PlaceTypes in the Land Use Element (LUE). Therefore, the establishment of Noise Districts consistent with PlaceTypes designations, as proposed by the project, rather than the establishment of acoustical neighborhoods, is appropriate for regulating noise. Therefore, the concerns cited in Section 1.5

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-47 (Areas of Controversy) and submitted during the scoping process are addressed in the Draft EIR, and no further response is required.

RESPONSE I-9-5
This comment refers to Project Strategy No. 13 and expresses concern that Special Events area classified as temporary. The comment states that as special events occur almost every weekend from April through Octobers, these are a stationary noise source, not temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-6
The comment cites the interior noise standards will be satisfied with windows in the close position, but notes many waterfront buildings do not have air conditioning. In addition, the comment states windows must be open during warmer months that correspond with Special Events and this would result in increasing harmful noise inside waterfront homes.

Please refer to Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise measurement standards.

RESPONSE I-9-7
The comment states that noise limits from Table 3.3 from the EIR need to be added to the Noise Element for enforcement of stated noise limits and inclusion in the Noise Ordinance.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the relation of the tables provided in the Draft EIR for proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance in relation to the Draft Noise Element.

RESPONSE I-9-8
The comment states that Noise District 2 has been extended without residential approval.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the process for determining land use types, zoning districts, and corresponding noise districts.

RESPONSE I-9-9
The comment cites Policy N 2-1 and requests a requirement be added to the Noise Element for noise to not escape north of Seaside Way along the Waterfront.

Policy N 2-1 refers to stationary-source noise standards from commercial and entertainment areas for residential or commercial uses. As described in Section 3.4.4.2 of the Draft EIR, the Waterfront PlaceType is located within District 2. Tables 3.2 and 3.3 in the Draft EIR provide the proposed revisions to the Noise Ordinance that provide maximum exterior and interior noise limits for each land use District (PlaceType). Stationary noise sources adjacent to the Waterfront PlaceType would be subject to the standards shown here, with implementation of Project Design Feature (PDF) 4.1.1 requiring amendments to the Municipal Code for consistency.

RESPONSE I-9-10
The comment states that having a temporary event every weekend from April to October is no longer temporary and states that these are a stationary noise source requiring mitigation pursuant to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines (2017).

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -48 Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-11
The comment requests the addition of c-weighted scale measurements to be added to Tables 3.2 and 3.3 as a source of low frequency noise and vibration from outdoor entertainment.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events, Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise standards, and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of noise measurement methodology.

RESPONSE I-9-12
The comment requests a maximum limit be placed on Special Event noise related to the statement that 70 db for community noise exposure is unacceptable.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events. In addition, it should be clarified that noise levels within Table 4.2.4 of the Draft EIR are taken directly from Appendix D of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines (2017). More specifically, these guidelines are specific to transportation uses within the State and are established to provide guidance to the City of Long Beach’s (City) on determining appropriate transportation-related criteria and making planning decisions near sources of roadway noise. Lastly, issues related to parking within the City are covered in the City’s Mobility Element of the General Plan are not applicable to the Draft EIR for the Noise Element. Therefore, the City will consider the comments provided; however, comments related to the use of noise level guidelines meant for transportation uses upon Special Events do not comment on the adequacy of the analysis provided in the Draft EIR.

RESPONSE I-9-13
The comment refers to Strategy No. 13 regarding special events and inquires about the purpose of the special event calendar.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-14
The comment requests the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-15
The comment provides the 2018 list of Outdoor Entertainment Events Permitted Near Residents on East Ocean Boulevard Downtown.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-49 RESPONSE I-9-16
The comment expresses concern for Special Events noise at residences along the downtown waterfront and requests the City stop permitting excessive amplified noise from outdoor commercial entertainment. The comment also states that noise levels from these events exceed noise levels permitted in industrial areas.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of PlaceTypes and land use decisions related to noise standards.

RESPONSE I-9-17
This comment expresses concern that Special Events area classified as temporary. The comment states that as special events occur almost every weekend from April through Octobers, these are a stationary noise source, not temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-18
The comment states that California Noise Law 46000 is missing from the list of applicable State of California noise regulations.

The comment is correct that California Noise Law Section 46000 of the Health and Safety Code is not specifically mentioned in the Draft EIR; however, these policies at the State level are incorporated by the City in the creation of its own Noise Element which incorporates similar policies and goals.

Furthermore, specific policies from Section 46000 are listed in the Draft Noise Element to further demonstrate consistency with these overarching State policies in the development of the City’s policies. This comment will be forwarded to the City decision-makers for their consideration during the project approval process.

RESPONSE I-9-19
The comment requests City enforcement for Special Event noise.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-20
The comment requests the City implement management of the frequency and intensity of special events in proximity to residents.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-21
The comment states the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) and requests the City not change the indoor noise measurement standards.

Please refer to Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise measurement standards and refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -50 RESPONSE I-9-22
The comment refers to Strategy No. 13 regarding special events and inquires about the purpose of the special event calendar.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-23
The comment requests the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-24
The comment requests that outdoor entertainment noise be added to the list of nuisance noise strategies to be regularly evaluated and updated.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-9-25
The comment requests that portable air-conditioning units be added for residences affected by outdoor entrainment noise where windows would normally be open.

This comment provides a recommendation for the City to retrofit residential buildings and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

The comment is noted and no further response is necessary.

RESPONSE I-9-26
The comment states noise limits from Tables 3.2 and 3.3 from the Draft EIR need to be added to the Noise Element.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the relation of the tables provided in the Draft EIR for proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance in relation to the Draft Noise Element.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: EIR
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 9:49:19 PM
For LSA
From: Kathy Kelton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 12:44 AM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: EIR
-EXTERNALTo Whom it may concern,
Please see the letter submitted by James Goodin, President of ORCA. I cannot state my concerns or issues better than Mr Goodin has in his letter. I concur one hundred percent with his comments.

Katherine Kelton
Long Beach Resident
562-355-5934
Sent from my iPhone

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -52

KATHERINE KELTON
LETTER CODE: I-10
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-10-1
The comment refers to the letter submitted by James Goodin (comment letter I-9) and states that the commenter concurs with those comments.

Refer to Response to Comments I-9-1 through I-9-26 above.

From: Jennifer Ly
To: Christina Maxwell
Subject: Fw: NOISE EIR COMMENTS
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 9:52:39 PM
For LSA
From: LINDA SCHOLL <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:26 PM
To: Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>; LBDS-EIR-Comments <LBDS-EIR[email protected]>; Linda Tatum <[email protected]>; Kelly Colopy <[email protected]>; Cindy Allen <[email protected]>; Tom Modica <[email protected]>; Patricia Diefenderfer <[email protected]> Cc: Linda Scholll <[email protected]>
Subject: NOISE EIR COMMENTS
-EXTERNALTo: Ms. Jennifer Ly, Planner
Re: Noise Element EIR Comments
Dear Jennifer,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments.

California Noise Law 46000 says all residents are entitled to an environment free of noise that causes harm to our health and well-being. Shouldn’t this Law and “The California Office of Policy and Research 2017 General Plan Noise Element Guidelines and Appendix D" be included as part of the environmental impact review?
So, if the purpose is to ensure an environment free of harmful noise, then :

1. The City of Long Beach must change the NOISE EIR and NOISE Element and Noise Ordinance to require noise level standard and enforcement of noise standards for outdoor amplified special events. This will allow us to live free of the hazardous and often abusive amplified noise from outdoor commercial entertainment that strips away our entitlement to live in an environment free of harmful noise. Our homes adjacent to Alamitos Beach, the Conventional Center parking lot, Marina Green, Rainbow Lagoon, etc., we are often unable to live in our homes up to three days a week, 12 hours a day, almost every weekend six to seven months a year as shown in the two attachments.

2. Throughout the EIR document, the health and wellbeing of residents must be changed to be the primary consideration- rather than as currently shown to be secondary to the needs of special events. (For instance, change Pg 4.2-26, Strategy No. 13 and six sub strategies. From "Balance the needs of special events while prioritizing the well-being of residents" to “Prioritize the needs of residents when planning the special events.”)

3. Pg 4.2-1, para 4.2.1, Scoping Process, bottom paragraph. It is disingenuous and not acceptable as currently written. Although each event may be "temporary," having a "temporary" event every weekend from April through October is a constant source of irritating PROLONGED NUISANCE noise that drives residents from their homes. Special events may be for fixed duration, but nonetheless they are a "Stationary Noise Source" that requires mitigation pursuant to the State of California General Plan Guidelines, dated 2017.

4. Add specific noise limits Pg 4.2-18, Table 4.2.4: Community Noise Exposure indicates that community noise exposure above dB is "Unacceptable," but Special Events routinely exceed dB for hours on end. Put maximum limits on Special Event noise for special events in the Noise Element...Noise Ordinance...NOISE EIR."

5. Pg 3-13, Table 3-1, footnote 2. "Interior noise standards will be satisfied with windows in the closed position." Change this to "...windows in seasonal position" as the previous Noise Ordinance specifies.

6. Pg 3-17, Table 3.2: Exterior Noise Limits and Table 3.3: Interior Noise Limits. Noise limits have been reinstated, they were missing from the previous draft. However, these noise limit tables need to be included in the Noise Element to ensure they are included in the Noise Ordinance. Without noise limits, these documents have no enforcement mechanism.

7. Pg 3-26, Figure 3-5. Proposed Noise District Map. The Noise District 2 has been extended along Ocean Blvd, east of Alamitos Ave, to include The Villa Riviera (800 E.

Ocean) and The Pacific Condominiums (850 E. Ocean) without resident approval. The result being that these several hundred residents are now subject to higher noise maximums then in their present "residential" noise zoning. Why is this?

8. Pg 4.1-11, para 4.1.6, Policy N 2-1. Specifying Waterfront Place Type, "Ensure that developments located in commercial or entertainment area do not exceed stationarysource noise standards at the property line of proximate residential or commercial uses." This means loud, disturbing noise should not escape north of Seaside Way along the waterfront. There is no corresponding implementation in the Noise Element. Add this requirement to the Noise Element and Noise Ordinance! Measure from different location heights as unobstructed locations will receive higher noise levels.

9. Pg 4.2-3, para 4.2.3.2, Measurement of Sound. States the C-weighted scale (dB C) is not considered in this analysis since low frequency noise measured by this scale are not typical of the ambient noise environment. But it is these low bass sounds from outdoor entertainment that vibrate the buildings and residents close by. One resident had to move because these vibrations affected her heart. The Long Beach 1975 Noise Element clearly identifies bass sounds as the source of many complaints.

10. para 4.2.4.4 lists "low-frequency music" as a vibration source. Add dB C maximum readings to Tables 3.2 and 3.3.

11. N13-1. What is the purpose of a Special Events Calendar? Shall residents read and run from their homes?

12. N13-2 through N3-5. Include residents' representatives to the permitting process as included at many other cities.

Respectfully,
Linda Scholl, 700. E. Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90802

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -56

LINDA SCHOLL
LETTER CODE: I-11
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-11-1
The comment cites California Noise Law 46000 and requests that this law and The California Office of Policy and Research 2017 General Plan Noise Element Guidelines and Appendix D be included as part of the environmental impact review. The comment continues to state the City of Long Beach must change the Noise EIR, Noise Element, and Noise Ordinance to require noise level standards and enforcement for outdoor amplified special events. The comment cites that homes adjacent to events at these event spaces occur often and references an attachment, which is a schedule of special events.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of California Noise Law 46000 of the Health and Safety Code.

RESPONSE I-11-2
The comment requests that the health and wellbeing of residents be the primary consideration in the EIR and requests Strategy No. 13 be revised from “Balance the need of special events while prioritizing the well-being of residents” to “Prioritize the needs of residents when panning the special events.”
This comment provides a recommendation for revisions to Strategy No. 13 in the Draft Noise Element. This comment will be considered by the City of Long Beach (City); however, this comment does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR); does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The comment is noted and no further response is necessary.

RESPONSE I-11-3
The comment states that given the schedule of special events from April through October, these events are a source of prolonged nuisance and are Stationary Noise Sources rather than temporary that require mitigation.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-11-4
The comment requests a maximum limit be placed on Special Event noise.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-57 RESPONSE I-11-5
The comment states the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) and requests the City not change the indoor noise measurement standards.

Please refer to Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise measurement standards and refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

RESPONSE I-11-6
The comment states that noise limits from Tables 3.2 and 3.3 from the Draft EIR need to be added to the Noise Element.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the relation of the tables provided in the Draft EIR for proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance in relation to the Draft Noise Element.

RESPONSE I-11-7
The comment questions the Noise District map and related noise maximums for zoning districts.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the process for determining land use types, zoning districts, and corresponding noise districts.

RESPONSE I-11-8
The comment cites Policy N 2-1 and requests a requirement be added to the Noise Element for noise to not escape north of Seaside Way along the Waterfront.

RESPONSE I-11-9
The comment requests the addition of c-weighted scale measurements to be added to the analysis as a source of low frequency noise and vibration from outdoor entertainment.

RESPONSE I-11-10
The comment requests the addition of c-weighted scale measurements to be added to Tables 3.2 and 3.3 as a source of low frequency noise and vibration from outdoor entertainment.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -58 Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of Special Events, Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise standards, and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of noise measurement methodology.

RESPONSE I-11-11
The comment refers to Strategy No. 13 regarding special events and inquires about the purpose of the special event calendar.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-11-12
The comment requests the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

From: Jennifer Ly
To: Christina Maxwell
Subject: Fw: 2019 Noise Element Comments
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:02:31 PM
Attachments: 2018 Special Events permitted near residences on East Ocean downtown.docx For LSA
From: LINDA SCHOLL <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 2:50 PM
To: Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>; LBDS-EIR-Comments <LBDS-EIR[email protected]> Cc: Patricia Diefenderfer <[email protected]>; Cindy Allen <[email protected]>; Linda Tatum <[email protected]>; Kelly Colopy <[email protected]>; Robert Garcia <[email protected]>; Suzie Price <[email protected]>; [email protected] <allison.spindler[email protected]> Subject: 2019 Noise Element Comments
-EXTERNALTo: Ms. Jennifer Ly, Planner
Re: Noise Element Comments
Dear Jennifer,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments:

1. Noise level standards and enforcement for outdoor amplified special events must be added to the Noise Element, Noise EIR, and Noise Ordinance. a. These events generate loud, booming noise of excessive levels and prolonged durations, often exceeding 90 dB. They are held adjacent to residences (at the Long Beach Waterfront, Convention Center, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Queen Mary Events Park) all day and into the evening Saturday, Sunday and often Friday, almost every weekend from April to November. The bass levels of noise are so loud that residents often must literally flee our homes. You often can’t hear the telephone or watch the TV. You often cannot sleep. (See attached list of 2018 Events.)
b. Because they are of such prolonged duration and excessive noise levels, they are a "Stationary Noise Source" that is required by the State to be mitigated. c. The City of Long Beach must include and enforce noise standards and regulations for all special events that it sanctions (permits). Minimization of noise emissions from all government controlled or sanctioned activities should be a priority.” And “local noise reduction programs need to address the problems specific to each community, with the ultimate goals being the reduction of complaint frequency and …the provision of a healthful noise environment for all residents of the community.” (These guidelines are per page 373 of the 2017 California Office of Planning and Research General Plan Guidelines for the Model Noise Ordinance.) d. Most special events along the shoreline should not be described as "temporary." The word temporary is inaccurate and misleading, as you can see by the descriptions above. The text should be changed to accurately describe event noise regulations, management, mitigation and enforcement.

2. Page 46, Table N-5. The 2019 Noise Element must be changed back to match the 1975 Noise Element that clearly identifies the older construction needs and requires” “noise levels to be measured from the residences’ windows in seasonal positions (usually open in the summer) position.” Many homes along the shoreline (built before the events park and noise sources were established) were built to be cooled by ocean breezes, and they do not have air conditioning.

3. Please add to state regulations, page 12: “According to the California Noise Law 46000, all Californians are entitled to an environment without intrusions of noise which are may be a
Respectfully,
Linda Scholl, 700 E. Ocean Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90802
2018
Outdoor Entertainment Events
Permitted Near Residences on East Ocean Blvd Downtown
1 Events permitted before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. near East Ocean Blvd or after 11:00 near the Queen Mary are highlighted in the 2nd and 3rd column.

Events with decibel levels 2 or more times the noise limit recorded at the residences are highlighted in the last column.

Day From To Date Location Event
Tuesday 10:00 p.m. Mar 20 Convention Center parking lot The Cove Tuesday 10:00 p.m. Mar 27 Convention Center parking lot The Cove Friday April 13 Shoreline Drive The Grand Prix
Saturday April 14 Shoreline Drive The Grand Prix
Sunday April 15 Shoreline Drive The Grand Prix
Saturday 11 a.m. 11:00 p.m. April 28 Harry Bridges Memorial Park & Queen Mary parking lot
Smokers Club Show
Sunday 11 a.m. 11:00 p.m. April 29 Harry Bridges Memorial Park & Queen Mary parking lot
Smokers Club Show
Sunday 11 a.m. 6:00 p.m. April 29 Shoreline Park Dutch King’s Day Monday 3:00 a.m. April 30 Convention Center parking lot Take-down from Dutch King’s Day
Saturday 9 a.m. 3:00 p.m. May 5 Marina Green Toyota Fest Saturday 2 p.m. 11:59 p.m. May 5 Queen Mary Sea Walk, Valet Lots & Area 6
Freestyle Festival
Sunday 8 a.m. 10:00 a.m. May 6 Shoreline Park Race with a View Sunday 9 a.m. 11:30 a.m. May 6 Alamitos Bay Sensa
Saturday 6 a.m. 6:00 p.m. May 12 Marina Green Tour of Long Beach Saturday 2 p.m. 10:00 p.m. May 12 Shoreline Park Long Beach Music Fest Sunday 2 p.m. 10:00 p.m. May 13 Shoreline Park Long Beach Music Fest SundayMonday10:00
p.m.
4:00 a.m. May 13-
14 Shoreline Park Take-down from
Long Beach Music Fest
Friday 11 a.m. 10:30 p.m. May 18 Marina Green/Rainbow Lagoon Lesbian & Gay Pride Celebration & Parade
Saturday 11 a.m. 10:30 p.m. May 19 Marina Green/ Rainbow Lagoon Lesbian & Gay Pride Celebration & Parade
Sunday 11 a.m. 10:30 p.m. May 20 Marina Green/ Rainbow Lagoon Lesbian & Gay Pride Celebration & Parade
SundayMonday11:00
p.m.
8:00 a.m. May 20-
21 Marina Green/Rainbow Lagoon Take-down from the
Pride Festival
Saturday 9 a.m. 3:00 p.m. June 2 Marina Greens Toyota Fest Sunday 6 a.m. 4:00 p.m. June 3 Shoreline Park Los Angeles River Ride Saturday 7 a.m. 2:00 p.m. June 9 Shoreline Park Champions Run for Life, Torch Run
Saturday 9 a.m. 12:00 p.m. June 9 Marina Green Walk for hearing Saturday 11 a.m. 11:00 p.m. June 9 Harry Bridges Memorial Park & Queen Mary parking lot
Smoking Grooves R&B
Event
Sunday 10 a.m. 7:00 p.m. June 10 Rainbow Lagoon Dia de San Juan Festival Saturday 7 a.m. 10:00 p.m. June 23 Shoreline Park Zero Prostate Cancer Run 2018
Outdoor Entertainment Events
Permitted Near Residences on East Ocean Blvd Downtown
2 Saturday 11 a.m. 9:00 p.m. June 23 Harry Bridges Memorial Park Thirty-Second Annual Bayou Festival
Sunday 11 a.m. 9:00 p.m. June 24 Harry Bridges Memorial Park Thirty-Second Annual Bayou Festival
Thursday 11 a.m. 6:00 p.m. June 28 Convention Center & Rainbow Lagoon
Dew Tour
Friday 11 a.m. 9:00 p.m. June 29 Convention Center & Rainbow Lagoon
Dew Tour
Saturday 11 a.m. 8:00 p.m. June 30 Convention Center & Rainbow Lagoon
Dew Tour
Saturday 10 a.m. 10:00 a.m. June 30 Shoreline Park Pirate Invasion Saturday 10 a.m. 9:00 p.m. June 30 Shoreline Village Marina Pirate Festival Sunday 10 a.m. 10:00 p.m. July 1 Shoreline Park Pirate Invasion Sunday 10 a.m. 9:00 p.m. July 1 Shoreline Village Marina Pirate Festival Sunday 11 a.m. 4:00 p.m. July 1 Convention Center & Rainbow Lagoon
Dew Tour
Sunday 10 p.m. all night? July 1-2 Convention Center parking lot Take-down from the Dew Tour
Wednesday 10 a.m. 10:00 p.m. July 4 Queen Mary Queen Mary – All American 4th of July
Saturday 11 a.m. 11:00 p.m. July 7 Harry Bridges Park, Catalina lot & parking lots A9-A15
Summertime in the LBC
Sunday 10:00 7:00 p.m. July 8 Marina Green Long Beach Gospel Fest Saturday 2 p.m. 10:00 p.m. July 14 Shoreline Park Reggie Island Music Festival
Saturday 2 p.m. 10:00 p.m. July 21 Alamitos Beach Kaskade Sun Soaked 2018
Saturday 9:45 p.m. 10:00 p.m. July 21 Alamitos Beach Fireworks Friday 5 p.m. 11:00 p.m. July 27 Rainbow Lagoon Long Beach Crawfish Festival
Saturday 10 a.m. 10:00 p.m. July 28 Shoreline Park Love Long Beach Celebration
Sunday 10 a.m. 10:00 p.m. July 29 Shoreline Park Love Long Beach Celebration
Saturday 9 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Aug 4 Alamitos Beach Copa Cabana Beach Soccer Tournament
Saturday 10 a.m. 3:00 p.m. Aug 4 Rainbow Lagoon Beach City Brunch Sunday 9 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Aug 5 Alamitos Beach Copa Cabana Beach Soccer Tournament
Friday 5 p.m. 10:30 p.m. Aug 10 Rainbow Lagoon Long Beach Jazz Festival Saturday 11 a.m. 10:30 p.m. Aug 11 Rainbow Lagoon Long Beach Jazz Festival Sunday 11 a.m. 10:30 p.m. Aug 12 Rainbow Lagoon Long Beach Jazz Festival Sunday 11 a.m. 11:00 p.m. Aug 12 Harry Bridges Memorial Park & Queen Mary parking lot
Alt Summer Camp
Saturday 11 a.m. 11:00 p.m. Aug 18 Harry Bridges Memorial Park & Queen Mary parking lot
Corridos, Micheladas &
Mariscos Festival
Saturday 12 p.m. 11:00 p.m. Aug 18 Rainbow Lagoon LB BBQ Festival 2018
Outdoor Entertainment Events
Permitted Near Residences on East Ocean Blvd Downtown
3 Sunday 12 p.m. 11:00 p.m. Aug 19 Rainbow Lagoon LB BBQ Festival Wednesday 9 p.m. 9:15 p.m. Aug 29 Fireworks from
Taste of Downtown Long
Beach
Friday 5 p.m. 11:00 p.m. Sept 7 Rainbow Lagoon LB Lobster Festival Saturday 12 p.m. 11:00 p.m. Sept 8 Rainbow Lagoon LB Lobster Festival Sunday 12 p.m. 11:00 p.m. Sept 9 Rainbow Lagoon LB Lobster Festival Saturday 8:30 a.m. 2:00 p.m. Sept 15 Shoreline Park The Butterfly Walk/Run & Fluitter
Sunday 7 a.m. 11:00 p.m. Sept 16 Shoreline Park Aloha Run Saturday 9 a.m. 3:00 p.m. Sept 22 Marina Green Japanese Classic Car Show
Set-up at 5:30 a.m.

Saturday 9 a.m. 11:00 a.m. Sept 22 Rainbow Lagoon Los Angeles Heart Walk Monday 9:45
p.m.
10:00 p.m. Sept 24 Queen Mary? Unannounced fireworks
Friday late
afternoon
Sept 28 Marina Green Set-up for
Music Tastes Good
Saturday ? 10:00 p.m. Sept 29 Marina Green Music Tastes Good Sunday ? 10:00 p.m. Sept 30 Marina Green Music Tastes Good Saturday 6 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Oct 6 Marina Green, Shoreline Village & city streets
Jetblue Long Beach
Marathon
Sunday 6 a.m.
5:30
a.m.
6:00 p.m. Oct 7 Marina Green, Shoreline Village
& city streets
Jetblue Long Beach
Marathon
Sunday 10 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Oct 14 Rainbow Lagoon Pagan Pride Day LA/OC Saturday 7 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Oct 20 Shoreline Park Strides for Disability Saturday 8 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Oct 27 Shoreline Park The Children’s Clinic Beach Walk
Saturday 3 p.m. 10:00 p.m. Oct 27 Shoreline Village & Shoreline Park Zombie Walk Saturday ? ? Nov 3 Harry Bridges Park, Catalina lot &
parking lots A9-A15
Tropicalia Music and Taco
Festival
Sunday ? ? Nov 4 Harry Bridges Park, Catalina lot &
parking lots A9-A15
Tropicalia Music and Taco
Festival
Saturday 7:30
a.m.
11:00 a.m. Dec 1 Marina Green Parking Be the Match Walk/Run Monday 7 p.m. 1:00 a.m. Dec 31 Queen Mary Past and Present New Year’s Eve

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -64

LINDA SCHOLL
LETTER CODE: I-12
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-12-1
The comment states the commenter’s general concern related to Special Event noise and health hazards. The comment states that noise from Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green and requests noise level standards for special events be added to the Noise Element, EIR, and Noise Ordinance. The comment further states that amplified noise at these adjacent homes exceeds 90 dB.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-12-2
The comment states that given the prolonged duration and excessive noise levels, these events are a Stationary Noise Source that require mitigation.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-12-3
The comment states that the City must include and enforce noise standards and regulations for all special events that it sanctions (permits).

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-12-4
The comment states special events should not be considered temporary and requests the analysis be revised to describe these events with regulations, management, mitigation, and enforcement.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-12-5
The comment states the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) and requests the City not change the indoor noise measurement standards as many buildings do not have air conditioning.

Please refer to Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise measurement standards and refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

RESPONSE I-12-6
The comment states that California Noise Law 46000 is missing from the list of applicable State of California noise regulations.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-65 Please refer to Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of California Noise Law 46000 of the Health and Safety Code. This comment refers to the noise regulations listed in the Draft Noise Element as provided in Appendix B and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR); does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The comment is noted and no further response is necessary.

RESPONSE I-12-8
The comment provides the 2018 list of Outdoor Entertainment Events Permitted Near Residents on East Ocean Boulevard Downtown.

From: Jennifer Ly
To: Christina Maxwell
Subject: Fw: Attachments to prior NOISE EIR comments
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 9:53:12 PM
Attachments: 2018 Special Events permitted near residences on East Ocean downtown.docx 2018 Special Events permitted near residences on East Ocean downtown.docx From: LINDA SCHOLL <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:29 PM
To: Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>
Subject: Attachments to prior NOISE EIR comments
-EXTERNALHi Jennifer, please attach these two lists of special events to my Noise EIR comments sent just now.

Thank you,
Linda Scholl
2018
Outdoor Entertainment Events
Permitted Near Residences on East Ocean Blvd Downtown
1 Events permitted before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. near East Ocean Blvd or after 11:00 near the Queen Mary are highlighted in the 2nd and 3rd column.

Events with decibel levels 2 or more times the noise limit recorded at the residences are highlighted in the last column.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-73

LINDA SCHOLL
LETTER CODE: I-13
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-13-1
The comment requests a review of the two lists of special events provided as attachments to the previous comment letters (I-11 and I-12) submitted by the same commenter. The attachments provide the 2018 list of Outdoor Entertainment Events Permitted Near Residents on East Ocean Boulevard Downtown.

This comment does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR); does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The comment is noted and no further response is necessary.

From: Jennifer Ly
To: Moustafa, Margaret; [email protected]
Cc: Robert Garcia; Tom Modica; Kelly Colopy; Cindy Allen Subject: Re: comment on EIR draft
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 2:01:13 PM
Attachments: Outlook-LBDS Email.png
Outlook-facebook.c.png
Outlook-twitter.co.png
Outlook-cid_image0.png
Received, thank you.

Jennifer Ly
Planner
Long Beach Development Services | Planning Bureau
411 W. Ocean Blvd., 3rd Fl. | Long Beach, CA 90802
Office: 562-570-6368
LBDS Email Signature
From: Moustafa, Margaret <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 1:58 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Robert Garcia <[email protected]>; Tom Modica <[email protected]>; Kelly Colopy <[email protected]>; Cindy Allen <[email protected]>; Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>
Subject: comment on EIR draft
-EXTERNALDear Ms. Ly:

I object to the current Environmental Impact Report (EIR) draft classifying the city-permitted outdoor entertainment events with excessive amplified noise on the geographically connected beach front venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center parking lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Marina Green as temporary.

Given that these events happen repeatedly spring, summer, and fall with noise levels up to and exceeding 90 dBA, up to 12 hours a day, up to 3 consecutive days, year after year, they are not temporary.

They are, in fact, a Stationary Noise Source emanating from the same acoustical neighborhood.

The amplified noise from these events frequently make my home at 850 East Ocean Blvd unlivable days at a time. The amplified bass sounds from these events penetrate the units in my building facing the ocean and come into my unit on the other side of the building, causing me anxiety and chest pains when the noise vibrates my lungs.

I and my neighbors documented the noise level from these events and shared the information with the city. We repeatedly asked the city to control the amplified noise but, rather than protecting us as required by California Noise law 46000 and California’s General Plan Guidelines dated 2017, the city increased the frequency of these events.

The current Noise Element draft states on page 34 that, “.. prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increase[s] body tensions and thereby affect[s] blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system .. extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA would results in permanent damage.” As is commonly known, sensitivity to noise increases with age. I and the majority of the residents on East Ocean Blvd are senior citizens. Isn’t it a form of elder abuse to knowingly and repeatedly violate senior citizens’ right to live in their home without the intrusion of city-permitted excessive, amplified noise which is a hazard to their health? As a senior citizen, this situation forced me at great inconvenience and expense to move from the home I had planned to live in forever to another location. I am fortunate that I was able to piece together my finances to escape this unhealthy situation. There are others who are not as fortunate.

To credibly claim that Long Beach is a livable city, the city must classify all city-permitted events on beach-front venues for what they are, a Stationary Noise Source; it must control the city-permitted amplified outdoor entertainment noise emanating from the beach venues by the time the noise reaches the adjacent high-density residential buildings.

Sincerely,
Dr. Margaret Moustafa
Formerly 850 East Ocean Blvd, Unit 1309, Long Beach. Currently 104 Kingfisher Ct., Long Beach

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -76

MARGARET MOUSTAFA
LETTER CODE: I-14
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-14-1
The comment states the commenter’s objection to the Draft EIR’s classification of city-permitted outdoor entertainment with amplified sound on beachfront venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green as temporary. The comment further states that due to the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources emanating from the same acoustical neighborhood rather than temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-14-2
The comment states that the amplified noise results in anxiety and chest pain and states that they have measured the noise levels and shared this information with the City. The commenter also cites California Noise Law 46000 and states that the City has increased the frequency of events.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of California Noise Law 46000 of the Health and Safety Code.

RESPONSE I-14-3
The comment cites the Noise Element draft discussion of the effects of prolonged noise exposure on blood pressure, heart function and the nervous systems. The comment concludes that the citypermitted excessive amplified noise is a hazard to their health and the health of senior citizens.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of public health.

RESPONSE I-14-4
The comment requests Special Events and all other city-permitted events in beachfront venues be reclassified as Stationary Noise Sources and that the noise level of these events be controlled for impacts to adjacent high-density buildings.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

From: Jennifer Ly
To: Christina Maxwell
Subject: Fw: comment on the Noise Element draft
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 2:09:57 PM
For LSA
From: Moustafa, Margaret <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 2:07 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Robert Garcia <[email protected]>; Tom Modica <[email protected]>; Kelly Colopy <[email protected]>; Cindy Allen <[email protected]>; Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>
Subject: comment on the Noise Element draft
-EXTERNALPlanning Bureau, City of Long Beach Development Services Attention, Jennifer Ly
Re: The current NOISE ELEMENT draft: Amplified noise from city-permitted outdoor entertainment on the beach
Dear Planning Bureau:

The current Noise Element draft lacks enforceable, healthy noise standards for city-permitted outdoor entertainment events with excessive amplified noise emanating from the geographically connected beach front venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center parking lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Marina Green by the time the noise reaches the residents in the adjacent high-density, high-rise buildings.

They are, in fact, a Stationary Noise Source emanating from the same acoustical neighborhood.

The amplified noise from these events frequently make my home at 850 East Ocean Blvd unlivable days at a time. The amplified bass sounds from these events penetrate the units facing the ocean in my building and come into my unit on the other side of the building, causing me anxiety and chest pains when the noise vibrates my lungs.

The Noise Element draft states on page 34 that, “.. prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increase[s] body tensions and thereby affect[s] blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system .. extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA would results in permanent damage.” As is commonly known, sensitivity to noise increases with age. I and the majority of the residents on East Ocean Blvd are senior citizens. Isn’t it a form of elder abuse to knowingly and repeatedly violate senior citizens’ right to live in their home without the intrusion of city-permitted excessive, amplified noise which is a hazard to their health? As a senior citizen, this situation forced me at great inconvenience and expense to move from the home I had planned to live in forever to another location. I am fortunate that I was able to piece together my finances to escape this unhealthy situation. There are others who are not as fortunate.

To credibly claim that Long Beach is a livable city, the city must have healthy, enforceable noise standards for all city-permitted events on beach-front venues; it must control the prolonged, excessive citypermitted amplified outdoor entertainment noise repeatedly emanating from the beach venues by the time the noise reaches the adjacent high-density residential buildings. It’s the right thing to do and it is state law.

Sincerely,
Dr. Margaret Moustafa
Formerly 850 East Ocean Blvd, Unit 1309, Long Beach. Currently 104 Kingfisher Ct., Long Beach Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-79

MARGARET MOUSTAFA
LETTER CODE: I-15
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-15-1
The comment states that the Noise Element lacks enforceable standards for city-permitted outdoor entertainment with amplified sound on beachfront venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green. The comment further states that due to the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources emanating from the same acoustical neighborhood rather than temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-15-2
The comment states that the amplified noise results in anxiety and chest pain and states that they have measured the noise levels and shared this information with the City. The commenter also cites California Noise Law 46000 and states that the City as increased the frequency of events.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of California Noise Law 46000 of the Health and Safety Code.

RESPONSE I-15-3
The comment cites the Noise Element draft discussion of the effects of prolonged noise exposure on blood pressure, heart function and the nervous systems. The comment concludes that the citypermitted excessive amplified noise is a hazard to their health and the health of senior citizens.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events and Common Response No. 4 for a discussion of public health.

RESPONSE I-15-4
The comment requests Special Events and all other city-permitted events in beachfront venues be reclassified as Stationary Noise Sources and that the noise level of these events be controlled for impacts to adjacent high-density buildings.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Subject: Fw: Comments to draft Noise EIR and draft Noise Element Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 11:24:17 AM
Attachments: Noise Element EIR 2021 Review--MPM.pdf
Noise Element 2019 Review--MPM.pdf
For LSA
From: Pat Mills <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 6:22 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Cc: Jennifer Ly <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: Comments to draft Noise EIR and draft Noise Element -EXTERNALResent. Original had bad address.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Pat Mills <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021, 11:07:21 AM PDT
Subject: Comments to draft Noise EIR and draft Noise Element Please see my attached comments to the Draft Noise Element EIR, dated March 2021, and the Draft Noise Element, dated December 2019.

We residents that live along downtown Ocean Blvd are subject to hazardous noise continuously from April to October each year. Special Event Event entertainment conducted on the waterfront needs to be regulated by the Noise EIR, the Noise Element, and the Noise Ordinance. These Special Events conducted every weekend are not "temporary" as classified by the EIR but are a "Stationary Noise Source" that requires mitigation pursuant to the State of California General Plan Guidelines, dated 2017. To the residents that live adjacent to these venues, the events are continuous and a source of undue distress.

Thank you,
Mary P. Mills
600 E. Ocean Blvd

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-83 MARY P. MILLS
LETTER CODE: I-16
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-16-1
The comment provides introductory statements for specific comments provided below. The comment summarizes that their concerns are related to the classification of Special Events as temporary and states that they are Stationary Noise Sources that require mitigation pursuant to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines (2017). The comment states that Special Events need to be regulated by the Noise EIR, Nosie Element, and Noise Ordinance.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-16-2
The comment provides introductory remarks for specific concerns on the Draft EIR provided in the following comments.

RESPONSE I-16-3
This comment expresses concern that Special Events area classified as temporary. The comment states that as special events occur almost every weekend from April through Octobers, these are a stationary noise source, not temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-16-4
The comment states the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) and requests that the City not change the indoor noise measurement standards as many buildings do not have air conditioning.

Please refer to Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise measurement standards and refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

RESPONSE I-16-5
The comment cites the list of concerns provided in the Draft EIR on Page 1-4, Areas of Controversy, and on Page 2-3, Scoping Meeting Summary, and states that they do not see these concerns addressed throughout the document.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -84 Please refer to Response to Comment 1-9-4 above for a discussion of how the Draft EIR adequately addresses the concerns listed in Section 1.5 (Areas of Controversy), which describes key issues raised during the scoping process and public review period.

RESPONSE I-16-6
The comment provides introductory remarks for specific concerns on the Draft Noise Element provided in the following comments.

This comment is introductory and does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. No further response is necessary.

RESPONSE I-16-7
The comment states that noise limits are missing from the document and Tables 3.2 and 3.3 from the EIR need to be added for enforcement of stated noise limits.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of the tables provided in the Draft EIR and for proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance in relation to the Draft Noise Element.

RESPONSE I-16-8
The comment states the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) and requests that the City not change the indoor noise measurement standards.

Please refer to Common Response No. 3 for a discussion of noise measurement standards and refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

RESPONSE I-16-9
The comment requests that the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-16-10
The comment states the commenter’s objection to the Draft EIR’s classification of city-permitted outdoor entertainment with amplified sound on beachfront venues of Alamitos Beach, the Convention Center Parking Lot, Rainbow Lagoon, and Marina Green as temporary. The comment further states that given the repeat nature of these events, they are Stationary Noise Sources rather than temporary.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Comments on noise
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 9:16:49 AM
For LSA
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 2:46 AM
To: 'jimgoodin' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Council District 2 <[email protected]>; LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Comments on noise
-EXTERNALJim, thanks for your reply. I understand easier to manage performers who have permits than the motorcycle / hotrod crew, but it seems we should be enforcing the laws on the books. I suppose no reason we can’t do both as city council handles the creation of new laws and police the enforcement of existing ones.

Randy
Randy J. Schafer
Cell: (732) 822-3341
efax: (732) 875-0527
Skype: randy.schafer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/randyschafer
From: jimgoodin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2021 1:00 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Comments on noise
Thank you Randy for your response. The difference between street noise and entertainment noise is that street noise is already illegal and needs enforcement. The waterfront entertainment noise is presently permitted with no limits. Those of us adjacent need some noise mitigation to live normal lives. When we call the police they respond that they do not have jurisdiction since it is a Special Event. Your location is several buildings down from the most egregious loud entertainment so maybe it is not so bothersome, and you can close your windows.

Jim Goodin
On Sunday, June 13, 2021, 12:44 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

Responding to the email address for comments, copying my wife Robin Schafer, Jim Goodin of ORCA community and Cindy Allen’s office.

My apartment in the Pacific fasces both the marina and Ocean Blvd. While beach noise is troubling – a tyranny of mostly non-residents on the locals imprisoned in their units in the area, it is in my judgment, trivial compared to the noise pollution from vehicles on Ocean Blvd. The concerts are generally limited in duration and conclude before most people go to sleep. And the noise associated with a performance is part-andparcel of that performance. The noise from vehicles is never-ending – even nine floors up. And I can drive my Prius silently up and down Ocean Blvd, meaning the act of transportation – unlike entertainment, need not come with an overbearing degree of noise. In the case of the vehicles, my belief is that the noise is meant to impress; to convey power. Gratuitously; for no purpose relevant to transportation. Attacking the party noise is aiming at the wrong problem. It is, metaphorically, addressing the body bruise because it is simpler to go after the more serious problem such as arterial sclerosis. Fix the bruise if you like, but please get on with cleaning the arteries. And do NOT, by any means, claim victory of any note by addressing the bruises and leaving the arterial process to progress.

I intend to repeat these thoughts at the Jun 28 ORCA meeting at the Riveria.

Thank you.

Randy
Randy J. Schafer
Cell: (732) 822-3341
efax: (732) 875-0527
Skype: randy.schafer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/randyschafer

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-87

RANDY SCHAFER
LETTER CODE: I-17
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-17-1
The comment is part of an email exchange with James Goodin for his previous reply provided in Response to Comment I-17-2 below. The comment requests enforcement of illegal street noise as well as permitted entertainment noise.

RESPONSE I-17-2
The comment is part of an email exchange and provides James Goodin’s response to the comment provided in Response to Comment I-17-3 below. The comment states that waterfront entertainment is presently permitted with no limits and police respond to complaints stating they have no jurisdiction since it is a special event. The comment states mitigation is needed.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-17-3
The comment is part of an email exchange between the commenter and James Goodin and states that the commenter’s opinion that the noise pollution on Ocean Boulevard is a greater concern to them than the noise from entertainment events. The commenter requests addressing noise from transportation.

Please refer to Response to Comment I-8-3 above for a discussion of vehicle noise emissions and regulations in the State of California.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Draft Noise Element
Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:10:07 PM
For LSA
From: Sandra Stanton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 10:00 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Draft Noise Element
-EXTERNALJune 14, 2021
City of Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau Long Beach, CA 90802
Email:[email protected]
Attn: Jennifer Ly, Planner
Review of the Draft Noise Element, December 2019
Dear Ms. Ly:

Noise limits are missing from the document. Tables 3.2. and 3.3 from the EIR (March 2021) need to be added. Without stated noise limits, enforcement is not possible.

Indoor noise measurements need to be made with windows in the seasonal (usually open in summer) position. This is the current Noise Ordinance requirement--do not change it! Waterfront homes were built to be cooled by ocean breezes.

Include a resident's representative in the Special Events permitting process.

Many other cities have a review board for special events that has resident membership.

Ensure that Special Events conducted near homes adjacent to Alamitos Beach, Marina Green, Rainbow Lagoon, and the Convention Center parking lot are subject to the Noise Ordinance requirements. My home is rattled with excessive amplified noise every weekend between April and October. These are not "temporary" events as described in the EIR, but are a "Stationary Noise Source" that requires mitigation by the State of California.

As a six year resident of The Pacific at 850 East Ocean Blvd., I am hopeful that postpandemic times will not bring the same or even higher levels of noise affecting those of us whose homes face the marina and the ocean. I love living in Long Beach and in the downtown area. I am hopeful that the city will make every effort to consider the residents of the downtown waterfront residents in creating and enforcing Noise Ordinances.One thing that would be especially helpful would be enforcement of the loud pipes ordinance.

Sincerely,
Sandra Stanton
850 East Ocean Blvd. #1409
Long Beach, CA 90802
cc:

Robert Garcia, Mayor
Cindy Allen, 2nd District Councilwoman
Tom Modica, City Manager
Kelly Colopy, Director, Department of Health and Human Services

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -90

SANDRA STANTON
LETTER CODE: I-18
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-18-1
The comment thanks the City for the opportunity to review the Draft Noise Element and provides introductory remarks for specific concerns provided in the following comments.

RESPONSE I-18-2
The comment states that noise limits are missing from the document and that Tables 3.2 and 3.3 from the EIR need to be added for enforcement of stated noise limits.

Please refer to Common Response No. 2 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-18-3
The comment states that the current Noise Ordinance requirements to measure indoor noise with the windows open (seasonal position) must remain in place.

Please refer to Response to Comment I-6-3 above for a discussion of the existing Noise Ordinance.

RESPONSE I-18-4
The comment requests that the City consider resident representation and participation in the Special Events permitting process.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-18-5
The comment requests that Special Events be subject to the Noise Ordinance requirements and states that these events should be considered stationary noise sources rather than temporary requiring mitigation.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

RESPONSE I-18-6
The comment provides concluding remarks and states that enforcement of the loud pipes ordinance would be helpful.

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-91 This comment does not address the adequacy or completeness of the Draft EIR; does not raise environmental issues; and does not request the incorporation of additional information relevant to environmental issues. Such comments do not require a response, pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. No further response is necessary.

From: LBDS-EIR-Comments
To: Christina Maxwell
Cc: Jennifer Ly
Subject: Fw: Excessive noise from various private events on public beach properties.

Date: Monday, June 14, 2021 1:51:27 PM
For LSA
From: Steven Ozawa <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 7:38 PM
To: LBDS-EIR-Comments <[email protected]> Subject: Excessive noise from various private events on public beach properties. -EXTERNALGood Morning Jim. The various events held in Long Beach supports the entire Long Beach business community. To continue being considered a desirable destination city we cannot put unreasonable demands on them. One suggestion may be limiting the hours of night events. I personally enjoy the various events we host throughout the city. I am sure every metropolitan city have similar issues they deal with. This is only my opinion on the excessive noise issues. Thank You. Steven Ozawa. 850 E.

Ocean Blvd suite # 1602.

Sent from my iPhone

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 2-93

STEVEN OZAWA
LETTER CODE: I-19
DATE: June 14, 2021
RESPONSE I-19-1
The comment states that events held in Long Beach support the business community and should not have unreasonable demands placed on them. The comment also suggests to limit the hours of night events in relation to excessive noise.

Please refer to Common Response No. 1 for a discussion of Special Events.

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
2 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -2 This page intentionally left blank

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 3-1

3.0 ERRATA
This section of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) provides changes to the Draft EIR that have been made to clarify, correct, or add to the environmental impact analysis for the proposed General Plan Noise Element project (proposed project). Such changes are a result of further review of the Draft EIR. The changes described in this section are minor changes that do not constitute significant new information that alter the outcome of the environmental analysis or require recirculation of the document (State California Environmental Quality Act [State CEQA] Guidelines Section 15088.5).

Such changes to the Draft EIR are indicated in this section under the appropriate Draft EIR section.

With the exception of changes to tables and figures, deletions are shown with strikethrough and additions are shown with underline.
1) The second to last sentence of the first paragraph on Page 3-16 of Section 3.0, Project Description, of the Draft EIR has been revised as follows:

These proposed changes maintain current existing standards for indoor and outdoor noise limits for all other districts including for residential and other noise-sensitive land uses such as schools.
2) The last sentence of the first paragraph on Page 3-16 of Section 3.0, Project Description, of the Draft EIR has been revised as follows:

The total area of District Two, including its expanded boundaries, is limited to a total of 4 6 percent of the City’s land area.
3) The second sentence of the second paragraph on Page 3-16 of Section 3.0, Project Description, of the Draft EIR has been revised as follows:

Geographically, the proposed District Two boundaries expand upon the existing area to include additional portions of Downtown, Midtown, Central, and West Long Beach and key Waterfront areas, as well as portions of Belmont Shore. 4) Policy N 13-6 has been corrected to reflect the Draft Noise Element and is revised as follows on Pages 4.2-27 and 4.3-10 of the Draft EIR:

Policy N 13-6: Stay up-to-date with sound mitigation technology and noise assessment methods for -Special Events

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
3 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -2 This page intentionally left blank

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» 4-1

4.0 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

F INAL ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO C OMMENTS

GENERAL PLAN N OISE E LEMENT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
S EPTEMBER 2021
4 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Final EIR\Revised_Final EIR_Noise Element.docx «09/28/21» -2 This page intentionally left blank
element
City of Long Beach General Plan
creating livable environments
NOISE
2040
Volume I: Draft Environmental Impact Report
State Clearinghouse No. 2019050009
March 2021
This page intentionally left blank
VOLUME I:

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2019050009

GENERAL PLAN NOISE E LEMENT AND
AMENDMENTS TO THE CI TY’S NOISE ORDINANCE

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Submitted to:

City of Long Beach
Development Services, Planning Bureau
411 West Ocean Boulevard, Third Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Prepared by:

March 2021
This page intentionally left blank

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\Master TOC.docx «03/18/21» i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1

1.2 Summary of Location and Setting .....................................................................................1-1

1.3 Summary of the Project Description.................................................................................1-2

1.4 Alternatives.......................................................................................................................1-3

1.5 Areas of Controversy.........................................................................................................1-4

1.6 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures................................................................1-4

2.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Overview ...........................................................................................................................2-1

2.2 Environmental Review Process.........................................................................................2-1

2.3 Scope of this Draft EIR.......................................................................................................2-4

2.4 Effects Found not to be Significant...................................................................................2-5

2.5 Format of the EIR ............................................................................................................2-14

2.6 Incorporation by Reference ............................................................................................2-15

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Project Location and Setting .............................................................................................3-1

3.2 Long Beach General Plan...................................................................................................3-2

3.3 Project History...................................................................................................................3-6

3.4 Proposed Project...............................................................................................................3-7

3.5 Discretionary Actions, Permits, and Other Approvals.....................................................3-18

4.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES........................................................... 4-1

4.1 Land Use and Planning...................................................................................................4.1-1

4.2 Noise...............................................................................................................................4.2-1

4.3 Transportation ...............................................................................................................4.3-1

5.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................. 5-1

5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................5-1

5.2 Proposed Project...............................................................................................................5-2

5.3 Alternatives Analysis.........................................................................................................5-4

6.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................ 6-1

6.1 Short- and Long-Term Implications...................................................................................6-1

6.2 Energy Impacts..................................................................................................................6-2

6.3 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts................................................................................6-2

6.4 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes ...............................................................6-3

6.5 Growth-Inducing Impacts..................................................................................................6-3

7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND PERSONS CONSULTED................................................ 7-1

7.1 City of Long Beach.............................................................................................................7-1

7.2 Consultant Team...............................................................................................................7-1

7.3 Persons Consulted.............................................................................................................7-1

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\Master TOC.docx «03/18/21» ii

8.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 8-1 Incorporated by Reference............................................................................................... 8-1 Chapter 2.0, Introduction ................................................................................................. 8-1 Section 4.1, Land Use and Planning.................................................................................. 8-2 Section 4.2, Noise ............................................................................................................. 8-2 Section 4.3, Transportation .............................................................................................. 8-3 APPENDICES (INCLUDED IN VOLUME II: APPENDICES TO THE DRAFT EIR) A: INITIAL STUDY, NOTICE OF PREPARATION, AND PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENTS B: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN NOISE ELEMENT (DECEMBER 2019)
C: NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION LETTERS
D: NOISE EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT (LSA, 2018)

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\Master TOC.docx «03/18/21» iii

FIGURES AND TABLES

FIGURES
Figure 3-1: Project Location ..............................................................................................................3-19 Figure 3-2: Existing Major Sources of Noise......................................................................................3-21 Figure 3-3: Proposed Land Use Element PlaceTypes ........................................................................3-23 Figure 3-4: Future Traffic Noise Contours (2040)..............................................................................3-25 Figure 3-5: Proposed Noise District Map ..........................................................................................3-27 Figure 4.1-1: Existing Land Uses.....................................................................................................4.1-31 Figure 4.1-2: Community Plan Areas..............................................................................................4.1-33 Figure 4.1-3: Zoning Districts..........................................................................................................4.1-35 Figure 4.2-1a: Detailed Future Traffic Noise Contours...................................................................4.2-37 Figure 4.2-1b: Detailed Future Traffic Noise Contours ..................................................................4.2-39 Figure 4.2-1c: Detailed Future Traffic Noise Contours...................................................................4.2-41 Figure 4.2-1d: Detailed Future Traffic Noise Contours ..................................................................4.2-43 Figure 4.2-1e: Detailed Future Traffic Noise Contours...................................................................4.2-45 TABLES
Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance ...................................................1-5 Table 3.1: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure from Transportation Sources................................3-13 Table 3.2: Exterior Noise Limits.........................................................................................................3-17 Table 3.3: Interior Noise Limits .........................................................................................................3-17 Table 4.1.1: Existing Citywide Land Uses..........................................................................................4.1-3 Table 4.1.2: Existing Citywide Residential Land Uses.......................................................................4.1-4 Table 4.1.3: General Plan Consistency Analysis .............................................................................4.1-19 Table 4.2.1: Existing Long-Term 48-Hour Noise Level Measurements ............................................4.2-8 Table 4.2.2: Existing Short-Term Noise Level Measurements........................................................4.2-10 Table 4.2.3: Ground-Borne Vibration and Noise Impact Criteria...................................................4.2-17 Table 4.2.4: Community Noise Exposure Ldn or CNEL (dB) .............................................................4.2-18 Table 4.2.5: Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors.................................................4.2-30 Table 5.1: Summary of Project and Alternative ..................................................................................5-6 Table 5.2: Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Project to the No Project Alternative .....................................................................................................................5-9

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\Master TOC.docx «03/18/21» iv This page intentionally left blank

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-1

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that local government agencies, before taking action on projects over which they have discretionary approval authority, consider the environmental consequences of such projects. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is a public document designed to provide both the public and local and State governmental agency decisionmakers with an analysis of potential environmental consequences to support informed decisionmaking.

This Executive Summary has been prepared according to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15123 for the Draft EIR for the proposed General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80) (proposed project). This Draft EIR has been prepared for the City of Long Beach (City) to analyze the proposed project’s potential impacts on the environment; to propose mitigation measures for identified potentially significant impacts that would minimize, offset, or otherwise reduce or avoid those environmental impacts; and to discuss alternatives that could reduce the potentially significant impacts of the proposed project.

1.2 SUMMARY OF LOCATION AND SETTING
The location for the Noise Element project (also referred to as the “planning area”) encompasses the entire 50 square miles within the limits of the City of Long Beach (excluding the City of Signal Hill, which is completely surrounded by the City of Long Beach) in Los Angeles County (County), California.

The City is bordered on the west by the Cities of Carson and Los Angeles (including Wilmington and the Port of Los Angeles); on the north by the Cities of Compton, Paramount, and Bellflower, and the unincorporated community of Rancho Dominguez; and on the east by the Cities of Lakewood, Hawaiian Gardens, Cypress, Los Alamitos, and Seal Beach, and the unincorporated community of Rossmoor. The Pacific Ocean borders the southern portion of the City, and as such, portions of the City are located within the California Coastal Zone.

Regional access to the City is provided by Interstate 710 (I-710, which traverses the western portion of the City from north to south), Interstate 405 (I-405, which traverses the central portion of the City from northwest to southeast), State Route 91 (SR-91, which traverses the northernmost portion of the City from east to west), State Routes 103 and 47 (SR-103 and SR-47, respectively, which traverse the western border of the City from north to south), and State Route 1 (SR-1, which traverses the central portion of the City from east to west), commonly referred to as Pacific Coast Highway (PCH or SR-1). In addition, Interstate 605 and State Route 22 (I-605 and SR-22, respectively, located northeast and east of the City) provide access to the eastern portion of the City.

DRAFT ENVI RONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -2 Angeles County. A variety of bicycle lanes and paths serve the City, including regional connections along PCH, the San Gabriel River pathway, and the Los Angeles River pathway.

1.3 SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves both the adoption of a new General Plan Noise Element Project and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, Long Beach Municipal Code (LBMC) Section 8.80, which regulates noise and implements the policies of the Noise Element. These project components are summarized below. See Chapter 3.0, Project Description, for a complete description of the project components.

1.3.1 Proposed Noise Element
The proposed project is the adoption of a new General Plan Noise Element (included as Appendix B of this Draft EIR), which would replace the City’s existing 1975 Noise Element. As required by Section 65302 of the California Government Code, the Noise Element is a required element of a City’s General Plan. The proposed Noise Element includes strategies and policies intended to provide protection for land uses, as identified in the LUE, from excessive noise and vibration sources, as well as to implement the vision of a healthy, livable noise environment in the City.

The topics of noise and vibration are introduced with a discussion of the function of a Noise Element and its role within other planning and regulatory frameworks, the community engagement involved in shaping the element, and concepts for implementing the vision of the element. The Noise Element also includes information related to noise fundamentals, such as the characteristics of sound, measurement of sound and definitions of acoustical terms, physiological effects of exposure to noise, and common sound levels and their noise sources.

As part of the Noise Element, the City has established 16 strategies related to noise, which would aid review of future projects and their associated environmental impacts. In addition to the 16 strategies, the proposed Noise Element contains numerous policies that work together to achieve the goals of creating a healthy, livable community with the equitable distribution of noise, minimizing exposures to excessive noise, and allowances for elements necessary for a dynamic, growing city. These citywide policies aim to provide a holistic and comprehensive guide for the City, whereas future projects facilitated by project approval would provide a refined direction for distinct areas within the City.

Chapter 5 of the proposed Noise Element includes a Noise Plan, which addresses strategies and policies related to six topic areas describing sources of existing noise and vibration: (1) PlaceType Characteristics and Land Use Compatibility; (2) Mobility, including vehicular noise, rail, aircraft, and watercraft; (3) Construction; (4) Special Events; (5) Environmental Justice and Social Equity; and (6) Noise Management.

Chapter 6.0 of the proposed Noise Element includes implementation measures (comprised of tools and strategies), which are intended to be used to effectively implement the goals and policies contained in the Noise Plan. Implementation tools consist of the City’s regulatory processes, such as zoning regulations, the Noise Ordinance which is being updated as part of this project, development review, building and housing codes, CEQA compliance, City noise procedures and management,

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-3 interagency coordination, and enforcement. The implementation strategies summarize goals and policies from the Noise Plan and identify the responsible City departments and general timeframes for completion. Periodic progress reports will be prepared every two to three years to ensure that the City is adhering to implementation strategies outlined in the Noise Element.

1.3.2 Proposed Noise Ordinance Amendments
The City of Long Beach Noise Ordinance is contained in Title 8, Health and Safety, Chapter 8.80, Noise, of the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter 8.80, Noise, establishes exterior and interior noise limits for the generation of sound within the City. The maximum noise levels vary based on the receiving land use type and the cumulative duration of noise.

As detailed in Chapter 3.0, Project Description, several amendments to the Noise Ordinance would be included as part of the proposed project.

1.3.3 Project Design Feature
A Project Design Feature (PDF) is a specific component of the proposed project that has been incorporated in the project design to reduce potential environmental effects. This PDF is a part of the proposed project and does not constitute a mitigation measure. It is, however, included in this Draft EIR because it is intended to reduce potential project impacts. If applicable, PDFs are also described in the relevant sections of Chapter 4.0 for reduction of environmental effects of the proposed project.

PDFs are not included for each environmental topic.

Project Design Feature 4.4.1 To ensure that the proposed project complies with and would not conflict with or impede the City of Long Beach (City) Municipal Code, including the Noise Ordinance, the project shall implement a program to amend the Municipal Code to ensure that changes facilitated by the adopted Noise Element are consistent with the Municipal Code. The program to amend the Municipal Code shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Director of Development Services, or designee. All inconsistencies between the Noise Element and Municipal Code shall be resolved through text amendments within 36 months following project approval.

1.4 ALTERNATIVES
As required by CEQA, the No Project Alternative to the proposed project was selected for consideration in the alternatives analysis. However, it should be noted that two other alternatives, including the Alternative Site and Reduced Project Alternatives, were determined to be infeasible. • Alternative 1: No Project Alternative. This alternative would involve no amendments to the City of Long Beach’s (City) General Plan or the Long Beach Municipal Code Noise Ordinance. The existing General Plan Noise Element (1975) and the current Noise Ordinance would continue to guide and regulate the City’s noise environment.

The alternatives analysis is described in greater detail in Chapter 5.0, Alternatives.

DRAFT ENVI RONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -4

1.5 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15123, this EIR acknowledges the areas of controversy and issues to be resolved that are known to the City or that were raised during the scoping process and the scoping meeting held on May 30, 2019. Key environmental issues and concerns raised in the response to the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP)scoping process or at the scoping meeting were all related to noise, but many comments were directed at existing special events that occur in the City, and not related to the scope of the Noise Element EIR. The following issues were raised during the scoping process: (1) concerns regarding the health and welfare of City residents being impacted by the existing noise environment and noise exposure in the City, especially in the Downtown and Waterfront areas; (2) concerns that the noise complaint process with the City is ineffective; (3) recommendations that the Noise Element should include regulations limiting noise levels; (4) recommendations that the Noise Element should include regulations limiting the maximum number of days permitted special events are allowed or can exceed allowable noise levels; (5) recommendations that acoustical neighborhoods should be considered instead of land uses when regulating allowable noise limits; (7) requests to measure existing noise conditions from residences located near special event locations; and (8) recommendations for changes to the City’s current practices, such as making temporary events accountable to existing noise standards, hiring a sound technician and compliance officer to oversee standards related to noise generated from special events, and directing all amplified sounds away from City residences.

Please note that these are not exhaustive lists of areas of controversy, but rather key issues that were raised during the scoping process and public review period for the IS/NOP.

This Draft EIR addresses each of these areas of concern or controversy in detail as they relate to the proposed project, examines project-related and cumulative environmental impacts, identifies significant adverse environmental impacts, and proposes mitigation measures designed to reduce or eliminate potentially significant impacts of the proposed project.

1.6 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Table 1.1 identifies the potential environmental impacts and level of significance associated with implementation of the proposed project. Table 1.1 also identifies cumulative impacts resulting from the proposed project. Environmental topics addressed in this Draft EIR include land use and planning, noise, and transportation.

Refer to Section 2.0, Introduction, of this Draft EIR for a discussion of additional effects found not to be significant through the IS/NOP process, including aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and service systems, and wildfire.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-5 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation

4.1: LAND USE AND PLANNING
Threshold 4.1.2: Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Less Than Significant Impact.

General Plan. The proposed project involves the adoption of the proposed General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance. Proposed amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance are intended to create consistency between the existing Noise Ordinance and the proposed Noise Element. Additionally, the amendments to the Noise Ordinance would regulate noise and implement the policies of the Noise Element. As such, proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance would not conflict with existing elements of the General Plan because they are consistent with the intent of the proposed Noise Element.

The goals and policies in the proposed Noise Element are intended to provide protection for land uses, as identified in the Land Use Element (LUE), from excessive noise. The Noise Element identifies potential and anticipated noise sources and establishes programs to avoid or mitigate noise impacts. These goals and policies would reduce potential impacts related to incompatible uses and noise, and would promote a healthy environment to accommodate future projections in housing, population, and employment in the City.

As described in detail throughout Table 4.1.3, in Section 4.1, Land Use and Planning, the strategies and policies included in the proposed Noise Element are internally consistent with the City’s General Plan LUE, Urban Design Element (UDE), Housing Element, Open Space and Recreation Element, and Mobility Element. The proposed Noise Element would not result in inconsistencies with the Air Quality Element, Conservation Element, Historic Preservation Element, Public No mitigation is required. However, the proposed
project would be required to adhere to the
following project design feature related to land use
and planning.

Project Design Feature 4.1.1: To ensure that the
proposed project complies with and would not
conflict with or impede the City of Long Beach
(City) Municipal Code, including the Noise
Ordinance, a program shall be implemented to
amend the Municipal Code to ensure that changes
facilitated by the adopted Noise Element are
consistent with the Municipal Code. The program
to amend the Municipal Code shall be
implemented to the satisfaction of the City
Director of Development Services, or designee. All
inconsistencies between the Noise Element and
Municipal Code shall be resolved through text
amendments within 36 months following project
approval.

Less than Significant Impact.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -6 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
Safety, or Seismic Safety Element because, although these elements, together with the Noise Element, would serve to guide the overall development and urban form of the City, the Noise Element is not specifically interrelated with the goals, policies, and strategies of these elements. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable goals and policies outlined in the City’s General Plan.

Impacts are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required.

Airport Land Use Plans. The proposed Noise Element includes Policy N 10-1, which ensures that new development can be made compatible with the noise environment by using noise/land use compatibility standards and the airport noise contour maps as guides to future planning and development decisions. The proposed Noise Element also includes Policy N 10-9, which requires the evaluation of potential noise impacts and compatibility through analysis and mitigation required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As such, the proposed project would be consistent with applicable airport land use plans because future development would be required to evaluate potential noise impacts associated with discretionary development and ensures compatibility with the noise environment under the airport land use plans. Further, proposed amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance would not conflict with adopted airport land use plans. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with adopted airport land use plans. Impacts are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required.

Municipal Code. Several amendments to the Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Chapter 8.80, Noise) would be included as part of the proposed project. In the Section 8.80.030, Administration and Enforcement, of the City’s Municipal Code, text would be added to clarify and expand the capacity of the Noise Control Officer, which would streamline departmental responsibilities and administrative processes.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-7 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
Proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance also include updates to the boundaries of the noise districts to better reflect and be consistent with the recently adopted LUE PlaceTypes. The proposed update to the Noise District Map expands District Two boundaries to better capture areas that currently are characterized by mixed use development or are planned for mixed-uses and commercial uses in the future. The proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance also include adding mixed use as a land use type in Table A in Section 8.80.160 and Table C in Section 8.80.170 of the City’s Municipal Code. These proposed amendments would be consistent with proposed amendments to the Noise District Map.

Upon approval of the proposed project, these amendments would result in project consistency with the City’s Municipal Code.

Additionally, the proposed amendments would ensure consistency between the proposed Noise Element and the City’s Municipal Code. To ensure that the proposed project complies with and would not conflict with or impede the City’s Municipal Code, including the Noise Ordinance, the proposed project includes Project Design Feature 4.1.1, which requires the implementation of a program to amend the Municipal Code to ensure that changes facilitated by the adopted Noise Element are consistent with the Municipal Code. All inconsistencies between the Noise Element and Municipal Code are required to be resolved through text amendments within 36 months following project approval. Therefore, with incorporation of Project Design Feature PDF

4.1.1, the proposed project would be consistent with the City’s Municipal Code. No mitigation is required.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -8 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impacts.

Less Than Significant Impact. The cumulative impact area for land use for the proposed project is the planning area. Several development projects are approved and/or pending within the City. Each of these projects, as well as all proposed discretionary development in the City, would be subject to its own General Plan consistency analysis and would be reviewed for consistency with adopted land use plans and policies. For this reason, cumulative impacts associated with inconsistency of future development with adopted plans and policies would be less than significant.

Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with applicable land use documents. The project would also address potential inconsistencies with the City’s Noise Ordinance (as outlined in Project Design Feature PDF No. 4.1.1), which would reduce cumulative project impacts related to potential Municipal Code inconsistencies to a less than significant level. Further, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would potentially result in cumulatively considerable impacts. Therefore, land use impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered less than cumulatively significant, and no mitigation would be required.

No mitigation is required. Refer to Project Design
Feature PDF 4.1.1, above.

Less than Significant Impact.

4.2: NOISE
Threshold 4.2.1: Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact.

Short-Term Construction-Related Noise Impacts. The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and No mitigation is required. Less than Significant Impact.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-9 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would generate noise. However, since construction noise is regulated by the Noise Ordinance, noise impacts associated with construction activities are discussed below.

Construction activities associated with future development could result in substantial temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels at development sites throughout the City. Construction activities as part of future projects could adversely affect nearby noise-sensitive land uses. Proposed changes to the Noise Ordinance maintain current standards for interior noise levels for residential uses and schools and add a “mixed-use” land use type with corresponding maximum daytime and nighttime decibel levels to Table C in Section 8.80.170 of the City’s Municipal Code. Changes to exterior standards only consist of the addition of the “mixed use” land use type to District 2 in Table A in Section 8.80.160 of the City’s Municipal Code and would not result in any changes to the maximum noise criteria outlined in Section 8.80.160.

Therefore, any future construction activities and development would be required to adhere to the same exterior and interior noise standards for noise-sensitive receptors as required under the City’s existing Municipal Code regulations. Impacts would, therefore, be considered less than significant.

Construction noise is permitted by the City’s Municipal Code when activities occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and federal holidays, and between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction would be permitted on Sundays.

Construction noise impacts are currently exempt from specific noise levels limits; these limits would not change under the proposed project, and impacts would therefore be considered less than significant.

Additionally, the proposed Noise Element includes strategies and policies that would reduce construction noise impacts. Strategy No. 12 minimizes construction noise and vibration levels in residential areas

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -10 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
and other locations near noise-sensitive uses where possible. Policies N 12-1 though N 12-7 include measures to reduce construction noise at the sources, reduce noise conflicts, limit the allowable hours for construction activities near sensitive uses, establish noise level standards based on PlaceType as part of the City’s Municipal Code, and encourage construction best practices that reduce noise. Therefore, short-term construction-related noise impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.

Long-Term Stationary-Source Noise Impacts. Future development projects may include the installation or creation of new stationary sources of noise, or could include the development of new sensitive land uses in the vicinity of existing noise sources.

The proposed Noise Element includes policies and strategies to protect sensitive receptors from stationary noise sources and encourage land use compatibility. Strategy No. 1 applies site planning and other design standards to reduce noise impacts, especially within the Founding and Contemporary Neighborhoods, Multifamily Residential—Low and Moderate, and Neighborhood-Serving Centers and Corridors – Low and Moderate PlaceTypes. Policies N 1-1 through N 1-9 integrate noise considerations into the land use planning process to prevent new noise conflicts, requires noise attenuation measures to be incorporated into all development and redevelopment of sensitive receptors, and ensures that project site design and function minimize noise. In addition, any new noise-generating sources would be subject to compliance with Chapter 8.80, Noise (including the amendments proposed as part of the project), which sets exterior and interior noise standards for the various land uses within the City.

The proposed Noise Element includes policies and strategies that would ensure future development projects incorporate site planning and project design strategies to protect sensitive receptors from stationary noise sources in excess of acceptable levels. Additionally, the proposed project includes amendments to the Noise Ordinance to better reflect

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-11 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
and be consistent with the recently adopted LUE PlaceTypes. Finally, the proposed project does not change the exterior and interior noise standards for the various land uses (except to update the boundaries of the Noise Districts and add Mixed Use as a land use type). Therefore, implementation of the proposed project, which includes no physical development, would not expose persons to noise levels in excess of applicable standards, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required.

Long-Term Traffic Noise Impacts. It is projected that traffic volumes on some streets within the City would increase due to the growth envisioned under the recently approved LUE and buildout of the General Plan. This increase in traffic volumes would result in increased traffic noise levels compared to existing conditions. Traffic noise increase under the recently adopted LUE would be up to 2.1 dBA, which is considered less than the threshold of perceptibility for humans (i.e., 3 dBA). Therefore, traffic noise that is regulated under the proposed project would not be readily perceptible in suburban or urban outdoor environments.

The noise contours presented in the proposed Noise Element would be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses that minimizes the exposure of community residents to excessive noise. The future noise contours presented in the proposed Noise Element are consistent with assumptions made in the LUE and the Mobility Element.

Additionally, the proposed Noise Element would include allowable interior and exterior noise exposure levels from transportation sources for various land uses proposed by the Noise Element. These allowable noise exposure levels from transportation sources are intended to be used as a guide to establish a pattern of land uses that minimizes exposure of residents to excessive noise. Adherence to allowable interior and exterior noise exposure levels from transportation sources would ensure that noise impacts resulting from transportation sources would be less than significant.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -12 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
Additionally, Strategy Nos. 6 through 8, included in the proposed Noise Element, are aimed at managing traffic-related noise. The proposed Noise Element includes future noise contours, allowable interior and exterior noise exposure levels from transportation sources for various land uses, and strategies and policies to better reflect the recently adopted LUE PlaceTypes and reduce long-term transportation noise impacts. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not allow the exposure of persons to noise levels in excess of applicable standards, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required.

Threshold 4.2.2: Would the project generate excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would generate vibration or noise. However, future construction activities considered by the proposed Noise Element could result in the generation of ground-borne vibration.

Chapter 8.80 of the City’s Noise Ordinance would continue to limit the operation of any device that creates vibration, including pile driving, that is above the vibration perception threshold. Any future construction activities would be required to comply with the Noise Ordinance requirements. Therefore, future construction activities would not result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to excessive ground-borne vibration or noise levels.

The proposed Noise Element also includes policies and strategies that protect sensitive receptors from vibration in excess of acceptable levels including Strategy No. 12, which minimizes construction noise and vibration levels in residential areas and other locations near noisesensitive uses where possible. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not expose persons to excessive ground-borne No mitigation is required. Less than Significant Impact.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-13 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
vibration and/or ground-borne noise levels, and impacts are considered less than significant. No mitigation is required.

Threshold 4.2.3: For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. Aircraft noise in the City of Long Beach is primarily related to aircraft operations at Long Beach Airport, Los Angeles International Airport, and John Wayne Airport. Long Beach Airport is located centrally within the City, approximately 3 miles northeast of downtown.

The proposed Noise Element includes Strategy No. 10, which requires measures to minimize the adverse effects of aircraft-related noise. The proposed Noise Element also includes Policy N 10-1, which ensures that new development can be made compatible with the noise environment by using noise/land use compatibility standards and the airport noise contour maps as guides to future planning and development decisions.

Further, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would have the potential to expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to excessive noise levels from aircraft noise sources. No mitigation is required.

No mitigation is required. No Impact.

Cumulative Noise Impacts.

Less Than Significant Impact. The cumulative area for noise impacts is the planning area and any sensitive receptors within the planning area.

Cumulative growth within the City could result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels at development sites throughout the City. However, construction-related noise would be temporary and would no longer occur once construction of individual future projects is No mitigation is required. Less than Significant Impact.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -14 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
completed. In addition, future construction activities would be subject to compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance and proposed amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance to ensure that noise impacts from construction sources are reduced. In addition, the proposed Noise Element includes strategies and policies that would reduce construction noise impacts. Strategy No. 12 minimizes construction noise and vibration levels in residential areas and other locations near noisesensitive uses, where possible. Policies N 12-1 though N 12-7 include measures to reduce construction noise at the sources, reduce noise conflicts, limit the allowable hours for construction activities near sensitive uses, establish noise level standards based on PlaceType as part of the City’s Municipal Code, and encourage construction best practices that reduce noise. Because implementation of the proposed project does not result in any physical construction activitiesthat would produce noise, the proposed project would not be considered to have a cumulatively considerable contribution to the total noise environment in the City.

The proposed project would not create a cumulatively considerable contribution to regional noise conditions as it does not include any physical improvements or development. Implementation of the proposed project would not impact traffic volumes and would not generate a significant impact under cumulative noise conditions.

Additionally, implementation of the proposed Noise Element strategies and policies would require the City to consider noise and land use compatibility issues when evaluating individual future development proposals. Finally, the future noise contours and allowable interior and exterior noise exposure levels from transportation sources for various land uses included in the proposed Noise Element as described above are intended to be used as a guide to establish a pattern of land uses that minimizes exposure of residents to excessive noise.

For the reasons stated above, implementation of the proposed project would not result in a substantial cumulative increase in noise. Further, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-15 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would potentially result in cumulatively considerable noise impacts. Therefore, noise impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered less than cumulatively significant, and no mitigation would be required.

4.3: TRANSPORTATION
Threshold 4.3.1: Would the project conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to traffic. However, since the proposed Noise Element is intended to manage transportation noise, general transportation impacts are discussed below.

General Plan Mobility Element. The planning area includes multiple sources of noise related to mobility, including vehicles, rail, aircraft, and watercraft. Proposed Noise Element Strategy Nos. 6 through 11 are aimed at managing mobility-related noise. Strategies include minimizing vehicular traffic noise in residential areas and near noisesensitive land uses; promoting multimodal mobility to reduce noise generated from vehicular traffic; implementing street design and maintenance practices to minimize vehicular noise impacts; minimizing train noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses; minimizing the adverse effects of aircraft-related noise; and minimizing watercraft noise level impacts to residential areas and in other locations near noise-sensitive uses, where possible. These strategies and their associated policies further the goals of the Mobility Element. Therefore, the proposed Noise Element would be consistent with the overall intent of the City’s General Plan Mobility Element.

No mitigation is required. Less than Significant Impact.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -16 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
The proposed project involves the adoption of the proposed General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance.

Proposed amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance are intended to create consistency between the existing Noise Ordinance and the proposed Noise Element. Additionally, the amendments to the Noise Ordinance would regulate noise and implement the policies of the Noise Element. As such, proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance would not conflict with the Mobility Element because they are consistent with the intent of the proposed Noise Element.

It is projected that traffic volumes on some streets within the City would increase due to the growth envisioned under the recently approved LUE and buildout of the City. This increase in traffic volumes would result in increased traffic and associated noise levels compared to existing conditions.

The proposed Noise Element includes detailed future traffic noise contours. The noise contours would be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses that minimizes the exposure of community residents to excessive noise. The future noise contours presented in the proposed Noise Element are consistent with assumptions made in the LUE and the Mobility Element. Additionally, the proposed Noise Element includes allowable interior and exterior noise levels from transportation sources for various land uses. These allowable noise exposure levels from transportation sources are intended to be used as a guide to establish a pattern of land uses that minimizes exposure of residents to excessive noise.

The proposed Noise Element includes future noise contours, allowable interior and exterior noise exposure levels from transportation sources for various land uses, and strategies and policies aimed at managing long-term transportation noise impacts. Overall, the proposed Noise Element is consistent with assumptions made in, and the intent of, the Mobility Element. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the Mobility Element.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» 1-17 Table 1.1: Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Project Design Features, Mitigation Measures, Compliance Measures, and Levels of Significance
Potential Environmental Impacts Project Design Features and Mitigation Measures Level of Significance After Mitigation
Congestion Management Program. Since implementation of the project would not result in increases in volume-to-capacity ratio, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts with respect to the Congestion Management Program (CMP). Therefore,
implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the Los Angeles County CMP.

As discussed above, the proposed project would not conflict with any program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.

Cumulative Transportation Impacts.

Less Than Significant Impact. The cumulative impact area for transportation for the proposed project is the planning area. Several development projects are approved and/or pending within the City.

Each of these projects, as well as all proposed discretionary development in the City, would be subject to its own transportation consistency analysis and would be reviewed for consistency with adopted programs, plans, ordinances or policies addressing the circulation system. For this reason, cumulative impacts associated with inconsistency of future development with adopted programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing the circulation system would be less than significant. Further, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered a policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would potentially result in cumulatively considerable impacts.

Therefore, transportation impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered less than cumulatively significant, and no mitigation would be required.

No mitigation is required. Less than Significant Impact.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
1 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\1.0 Executive Summary.docx «03/12/21» -18 This page intentionally left blank

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-1

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 OVERVIEW
This Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80) (proposed project) in the City of Long Beach (City). The City is the “public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving the project” and, as such, is the “Lead Agency” for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) (State CEQA Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA Section 15367). CEQA requires the Lead Agency to consider the information contained in the EIR prior to taking any discretionary action. This Draft EIR is intended to serve as an informational document to be considered by the City and the Responsible Agencies during deliberations on the proposed project.

The anticipated project approvals associated with the proposed project are described in Chapter 3.0, Project Description.

An Initial Study (IS) (LSA, May 2019) (provided in Appendix A of this Draft EIR) was prepared for the proposed project. Following preparation of the IS, the City of Long Beach, as the Lead Agency, determined that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and that an EIR would be required to more fully evaluate potential adverse environmental impacts that may result from development of the project. As a result, this Draft EIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, as amended (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (California Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 14, Section 15000, et seq.). This Draft EIR also complies with the procedures established by the City for the implementation of CEQA.

Questions regarding the preparation of this Draft EIR and the City’s review of the proposed project should be referred to the following:

Jennifer Ly, Planner
City of Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau 411 West Ocean Boulevard, Third Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Phone: (562) 570-6368
Email: [email protected]

2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21000, et seq., requires that a public agency prepare an EIR when the public agency finds substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment (PRC Section 21080 (d)). The basic purposes of CEQA are to:

1. Inform governmental decision makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of proposed activities;

2. Identify the ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced;

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -2

3. Prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures when the governmental agency finds the changes to be feasible; and

4. Disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency approved the project in the manner the agency chose if significant environmental effects are involved.

In compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines, the City has taken steps to maximize opportunities for the public and other public agencies to participate in the environmental review process. The City conducted the scoping process and held a public scoping meeting, issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed project, and determined that an EIR was required to evaluate the potentially significant environmental effects of the proposed project and related actions. Further, this Draft EIR is subject to public review and comment. These topics related to the environmental review process are described in further detail below.

2.2.1 Initial Study and Notice of Preparation
The City, as the Lead Agency, originally prepared an Initial Study (IS) and issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) on an EIR for the original project on May 17, 2019, which was distributed via the State Clearinghouse (SCH). The SCH issued a project number for the EIR (SCH No. 2019050009). The primary purpose of preparing the Initial Study was to scope the environmental analysis and evaluate potential environmental impacts that may result from project approval. The Initial Study was also used to scope out environmental issues that were determined to be “less than significant” or “no impact.” In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15082, the NOP was circulated to responsible agencies and individuals for a period of 32 days, during which time written comments were solicited pertaining to environmental issues and topics that the EIR should evaluate.

Responses to the IS/NOP were received from the following agencies and groups:
• California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 7 • Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) • Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)
• Ocean Residents Community Association (ORCA)
The following individuals submitted written comments on the NOP:
• Linda Scholl
• Diana Lejins
• Katherine Kelton
• Leroy M. J. Keife
• Sarah Bedy
• Kathy Kelton
• Robert Fox
• Bob Kelton
• Maria Gonzalez
• Margaret Moustafa
• Gregory Samaras
• Laurence Gresko
• Genny Hulbrock
• William Sheehan
• Dianne Sundstrom
• Robert W. Cash
• Phil Dandridge
• Mary M. Hester

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-3 • Thomas Dorich
• Claire Heiss
• Feeruza Shah
• James A. Goodin
• Heidi Maerker
• Sandra Stanton
• Dennis L. Stone
• Pat Welch

2.2.2 Scoping Meeting Summary
The City held a public scoping meeting to present the original project and to solicit input from interested individuals regarding environmental issues that should be addressed in the Draft EIR. The scoping meeting was held on May 30, 2019 from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at Bixby Park Social Hall, located at 130 Cherry Avenue in the City of Long Beach. Key environmental issues and concerns raised in the response to the IS/NOP scoping process or at the scoping meeting were all related to noise, but many comments were directed at existing special events that occur in the City, and not related to the scope of the Noise Element EIR. The following issues were raised during the scoping process:
• Concerns that the health and welfare of City residents are impacted by the existing noise environment and noise exposure in the City, especially in the Downtown and Waterfront areas. • Concerns that the noise complaint process with the City is ineffective. • Recommendations that the Noise Element should include regulations limiting noise levels. • Recommendations that the Noise Element should include regulations limiting the maximum number of days permitted special events are allowed or can exceed allowable noise levels. • Recommendations that acoustical neighborhoods should be considered instead of land uses when regulating allowable noise limits.
• Requests to measure existing noise conditions from residences located near special event locations.
• Recommendations for changes to the City’s current practices, such as making temporary events accountable to existing noise standards, hiring a sound technician and compliance officer to oversee standards related to noise generated from special events, and directing all amplified sounds away from City residences.

Please note that these are not exhaustive lists of areas of controversy, but rather key issues that were raised during the scoping process. The Draft EIR addresses each of these areas of concern or controversy in detail, examines project-related and cumulative environmental impacts, identifies significant adverse environmental impacts, and proposes mitigation measures designed to reduce or eliminate potentially significant impacts. Appendix A includes the IS/NOP and copies of written comments received in response to the IS/NOP, as well as written comment cards received in response to the public scoping meeting.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -4

2.2.3 Draft EIR
This Draft EIR is being distributed to numerous public agencies and other interested parties for review and comment. The Draft EIR is also available at the location listed below. It should be noted that this location may not be open to the public due to the ongoing COVID-19 public health concerns. Copies of the Draft EIR are also available on the City’s website, which is provided below.

City of Long Beach City Hall
411 West Ocean Boulevard, First Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Hours: Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

Note City closure dates on alternating Fridays: www.longbeach.gov/furlough Saturday and Sunday, Closed
The Draft EIR is also available on the City’s website:
http://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ All comments received from agencies and individuals on the Draft EIR will be accepted during the public review period, which will not be less than 45 days, in compliance with CEQA. All comments on the Draft EIR should be sent to the following City contact person:

Jennifer Ly, Planner
City of Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau 411 West Ocean Boulevard, Third Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Phone: (562) 570-6368
Email: [email protected]
Comments will only be accepted in written form via e-mail and/or hardcopy letter delivered to the above-referenced e-mail and mailing addresses, respectively. After the public review and comment period, written responses to all comments received pertaining to environmental issues will be prepared as part of the Final EIR. As required by CEQA, responses to comments submitted by responsible public agencies will be distributed to those agencies for review at least 10 days (in accordance with Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines) prior to consideration and approval of the Final EIR by the Planning Commission and City Council. Upon completion of the Final EIR and other required documentation, the City Council may certify the Final EIR, adopt findings relative to the proposed project’s environmental effects after implementation of mitigation measures, and approve or deny the project.

2.3 SCOPE OF THIS DRAFT EIR
This Draft EIR has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts that may result from implementation of the proposed project. As the Lead Agency, the City has the authority for preparation of this Draft EIR and, after the comment/response process, certification of the Final EIR (FEIR) and approval of the proposed project as described in this Draft EIR.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-5 The City has the authority to make decisions on discretionary actions relating to development of the proposed project. As previously stated, this Draft EIR is intended to serve as an informational document to be considered by the City during deliberations on the proposed project. This Draft EIR evaluates and mitigates a reasonable worst-case scenario of potential impacts associated with the proposed project.

As previously stated, the City is the Lead Agency for the proposed project under CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15367). CEQA requires the Lead Agency to consider the information contained in the EIR prior to taking any discretionary actions. This Draft EIR provides information to the Lead Agency and other public agencies, the general public, and decision makers regarding the potential environmental impacts from construction and operation of the proposed project. The purpose of the public review of the Draft EIR is to evaluate the adequacy of the environmental analysis in terms of compliance with CEQA. Section 15151 of the State CEQA Guidelines states the following regarding standards from which adequacy is judged:
“An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decisionmakers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main points of disagreement among experts. The courts have not looked for perfection but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure.” Under CEQA (PRC Section 21002.1[a]):
“The purpose of an environmental impact report is to identify the significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, and to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided.” As previously discussed in Chapter 1.0, Executive Summary, an EIR is the most comprehensive form of environmental documentation identified in CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines and provides the information needed to assess the environmental consequences of a proposed project. EIRs are intended to provide an objective, factually supported, full-disclosure analysis of the environmental consequences associated with a proposed project that has the potential to result in significant, adverse environmental impacts.

2.4 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
As required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15128, this Draft EIR identifies the potential effects of the proposed project that were determined not to be significant and adverse, and therefore, not addressed in the Draft EIR. The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts related to aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -6 resources, utilities and service systems, and wildfire. These issues are briefly discussed below along with the substantiation for why they were determined not to be significant.

2.4.1 Aesthetics
The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or developments that would result in impacts to scenic vistas.

The project would not result in changes to height or density of land uses, and consequently, the project would not impact views of scenic resources in the planning area. As a result of implementation of the proposed project, the existing scenic quality of the planning area would remain unchanged and sources of light and glare in the planning area would remain the same as existing conditions. Each future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. For these reasons, approval of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse impacts to aesthetics. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
The planning area is almost entirely developed and is not used for agricultural or forestry purposes.

No properties within the planning area are designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance nor are there areas zoned for agricultural or forestry uses. Further, there are no areas protected by a Williamson Act contract. As such, implementation of the proposed project would not result in environmental changes that could result in the conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Furthermore, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to agricultural and forestry resources.

Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.3 Air Quality
The planning area includes the entirety of the City of Long Beach, which is part of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The Basin includes all of Orange County and portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Air quality within the Basin is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) in March 2017.

The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would conflict with the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), result in an exceedance of SCAQMD criteria pollutant emission thresholds, result in increased short- or long-term emissions, or generate odors within the planning area. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-7

2.4.4 Biological Resources
In its existing setting, the planning area is almost entirely developed and is located in an urban area of Los Angeles County. These urban areas do not contain mapped habitat for any sensitive biological species as identified on local/regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Although the majority of the planning area is urban in nature, the City contains a number of open space areas (e.g., El Dorado Regional Park, the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Los Cerritos Wetlands, beaches along the Pacific Ocean shoreline, rights-of-way, marinas, bays, riparian habitat, and wetlands) that have the potential to support sensitive biological resources. However, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to biological resources. Existing habitat and species would not be affected as a result of implementation of the proposed project.

According to the National Wetlands Inventory managed by the USFWS, although the majority of the planning area is urban in nature, the planning area does contain riparian habitat that has the potential to support sensitive biological resources; however, the planning area does contain State and federally protected wetlands that have the potential to support sensitive biological resources.1 As stated previously, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to biological resources.

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code 3503 protect most native bird species from destruction or harm. This protection extends to individuals, as well as any part, nest, or eggs of any bird listed as migratory. Most native North American bird species are on the MBTA list.

Implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts related to interference with the movement of species within wildlife corridors. As stated previously, the proposed project involvesthe adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to biological resources.

The City of Long Beach Municipal Code (Ordinance C-7642) regulates the care and removal of trees on public property and is intended to preserve and protect the community’s urban forest and to promote the health and safety of City trees. The City’s Municipal Code requires that a municipal permit from the City of Long Beach Director of Public Works be obtained prior to the removal of trees on City-owned property. The City’s Tree Maintenance Policy also requires a 1:1 replacement ratio and payment of a fee that is equivalent to a City-approved 15-gallon tree. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the City’s tree preservation policies. As stated previously, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise

1 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). National Wetlands Inventory. Website: https://www.fws. gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html (accessed March 25, 2020).

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -8 Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to biological resources.

There are no adopted Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP), Natural Communities Conservation Plans (NCCP), or other similar plans within the City.

For the reasons stated above, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to biological resources. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical, archaeological, or tribal cultural resource.

CEQA defines a “historical resource” as a resource that meets one or more of the following criteria:
(1) listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources; (2) listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(k); (3) identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); or (4) determined to be a historical resource by a project’s Lead Agency (PRC Section 21084.1 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[a]). The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to historical resources.

The City’s General Plan Land Use Element aims to minimize potential impacts to unknown archaeological resources through compliance with applicable federal, State, and local guidelines. In its existing setting, the planning area is almost entirely developed and is located in an urban area of Los Angeles County. Consequently, much of the planning area has been previously disturbed as a result of past construction activities in the City. As stated previously, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to archaeological resources. Similarly, the proposed project would not disturb any human remains.

For the reasons stated above, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to cultural resources. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.6 Energy
The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would require energy consumption. As such, the proposed project would not result in an environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient,

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-9 or unnecessary consumption of energy resources because the project would not require energy consumption, nor would it conflict with state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.7 Geology and Soils
Given the City’s location in the seismically active area of Southern California, portions of the planning area are located within a Fault Zone, as designated by the California Department of Conservation (DOC) and United States Geological Survey (USGS). According to the City’s General Plan Seismic Safety Element (1988), the most prominent fault zone in the City is the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, which transverses the City from the northwest to the southeast. The proposed project involvesthe adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development. Future individual projects subject to discretionary approval would be required to be consistent with City requirements established in the Seismic Safety Element and would be required to comply with current applicable building codes. As such, implementation of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects related to the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, or seismicrelated failure (e.g., liquefaction or landslides).

As stated previously, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts related to substantial soil erosion, unstable soils, expansive soils, or soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Compliance with applicable building codes in effect at the time future projects are proposed and preparation of sitespecific geology and soils engineering studies would ensure that future projects would not result in impacts related to substantial soil erosion, unstable soils, expansive soils, or soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems.

In its existing setting, the planning area is almost entirely developed and is located in an urban area of Los Angeles County. Consequently, much of the planning area has been previously disturbed as a result of past construction activities in the City. As stated previously, the proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would impact paleontological resources. As a result of implementation of the proposed project, the existing paleontological setting would remain unchanged.

For the reasons stated above, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to geology and soils. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and projectspecific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -10

2.4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would directly or indirectly generate GHG emissions or conflict with any plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hazardous materials are chemicals that could potentially cause harm during an accidental release or mishap, and are defined as being toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, and an irritant or strong sensitizer.1 Hazardous substances include all chemicals regulated under the United States Department of Transportation “hazardous materials” regulations and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “hazardous waste” regulations. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment. The probable frequency and severity of consequences from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is affected by the type of substance, the quantity used or managed, and the nature of the activities and operations. The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; create a hazard to the public or the environment through the release of hazardous materials; emit hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of any school; result in a significant impact related to a known hazardous materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65965.5, and therefore, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment; interfere with air traffic patterns, conflict with established Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) flight protection zones, or conflict with building height standards established by the FAA for structures on and adjacent to the Long Beach Airport; interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; nor expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death from wildland fires. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Further, future individual projects subject to discretionary approval would be required to comply with all policies set forth in the City’s Emergency Operations Plan and the General Plan Public Safety Element (1978). Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
The City is subject to the requirements of the Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Discharges from the City of Long Beach (City of Long Beach MS4 Permit), Order

1 A “sensitizer” is a chemical that can cause a substantial proportion of people or animals to develop an allergic reaction in normal tissue after repeated exposure to a chemical (U.S. Department of Labor, 2017.

Appendix A TO Sections 1910.1200—Health Hazard Criteria, Section A.4, Respiratory or Skin Sensitization.

Website: https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/hazcom-appendix-a.html [accessed March 25, 2020]).

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-11 No. R4-2014-0024, NPDES No. CAS004003. The proposed project involvesthe adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in the violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Further, future projects would be designed to implement Storm Water Prevention Plans, Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs), Low Impact Development (LID) Plans, and other mitigation, where necessary, to mitigate adverse impacts related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.

The City is highly urbanized, with infrastructure in place to accommodate future development projects. Approximately 60 percent of the City’s existing water supply consists of groundwater extracted from the local Central Basin of the Los Angeles groundwater basin, with the remaining 40 percent consisting of imported water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.1 As stated previously, the proposed project involvesthe adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in the depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge. Additionally, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the alteration of existing drainage patterns or alterations to the course of a stream or river. The proposed project does not include or facilitate physical improvements that would be at risk of inundation in the event of flood, tsunami, or seiche events. Lastly, the proposed project addresses the noise environment in the City and does not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

For the reasons stated above, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to hydrology and water quality. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.11 Mineral Resources
According to the City’s General Plan Conservation Element (1973), the mineral resources within the City have historically consisted of oil and natural gas. However, over the last century, oil and natural gas extractions have diminished as the resources have become increasingly depleted. Although extraction operations continue, they are on a reduced scale as compared to past historic levels. The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value. As a result of project implementation, availability of existing mineral resources and locally important mineral resource recovery sites would remain unchanged. Any future

1 Long Beach Water Department (LBWD). Water Sources. Website: https://lbwater.org/water-sources/ (accessed March 25, 2020).

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -12 discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.12 Population and Housing
In its existing condition, the City is urbanized and includes a range of housing types and land uses that provide housing and employment opportunities to its residents. The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development and would not directly or indirectly induce substantial unplanned population growth.

No physical improvements are proposed as part of the project, and therefore, no new homes, businesses, roads, or other infrastructure would be constructed within the City as a result of project implementation. As a result of project implementation, no existing people or housing would be displaced, and the construction of replacement housing would not be necessary. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.13 Public Services
The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that may require fire protection services, police protection services, or school services. Additionally, implementation of the proposed project would not result in an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks, recreational facilities, or other public facilities. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not necessitate the need for new fire, police, school, parks and recreation, or other public facilities. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.14 Recreation
The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to recreational facilities. Additionally, implementation of the proposed project would not result in an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or recreational facilities. The proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.

Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts to park and recreation. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.15 Tribal Cultural Resources
As discussed in Section 2.4.5, Cultural Resources, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines or PRC Section 5020.1(k) because the project involves the adoption of the General

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-13 Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance. As a planning/policy action, the proposed project does not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in impacts to historical resources.

The proposed project would be required to comply with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18 regarding tribal consultation. In compliance with AB 52 and SB 18, letters were distributed to the following local Native American tribal representatives on April 1, 2020:
• Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, Andrew Salas • Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Anthony Morales • Gabrieleno Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, Robert Dorame • Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, Sandonne Goad
• Gabrieleno-Tongva Tribe, Charles Alvarez
• Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Joseph Ontiveros
• Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, Michael Mirelez • Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, Linda Candelaria
The letters are included as Appendix C of this Draft EIR. The letters provide each tribe the opportunity to request consultation with the City regarding the project. In compliance with AB 52, tribes have 30 days from the date of receipt of notification to request consultation on the project. SB 18 mandates that tribes receive 45 days from the date of receipt of notification to request consultation on the project. No responses from tribal representatives were received during the consultation period. As such, the tribal consultation process is considered closed.

For the reasons stated above, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.16 Utilities and Service Systems
The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities. Implementation of the project would not require water usage or wastewater generation, and does not include any utility improvements related to water or wastewater. Similarly, as a policy/planning action, the project does not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would generate solid waste. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -14 proposed as needed. As such, impacts to utilities and service systems would be less than significant.

Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.4.17 Wildfire
In its existing setting, the planning area is almost entirely developed and is located in an urban area of Los Angeles County. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) publishes maps that predict the threat of fire in individual counties in the State. Local responsibility areas and State or federal responsibility areas are classified as either very high fire hazard severity zones (VHFHSZ) or non-VHFHSZ based on factors including fuel availability, topography, fire history, and climate. The planning area is not located in or near a State Responsibility Area and does not include land classified as VHFHSZ as defined by CAL FIRE.1 The proposed project involves the adoption of the General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance, which are considered policy/planning actions and do not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development that would result in exacerbated wildfire risk. Any future discretionary project within the City would be evaluated individually, and project-specific mitigation would be proposed as needed. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this Draft EIR.

2.5 FORMAT OF THE EIR
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15120(c), this Draft EIR contains the information and analysis required by State CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15122 through 15131. Each of the required elements is covered in one of the Draft EIR chapters described below.

Chapter 1.0: Executive Summary
Chapter 1.0 contains the Executive Summary of the Draft EIR, listing all significant project impacts and the level of significance of each impact. The summary is presented in a tabular format.

Chapter 2.0: Introduction
Chapter 2.0 contains a discussion of the purpose and intended use of the Draft EIR. A summary discussion of effects found not to be significant and, therefore, not included in the Draft EIR analysis is also included in this chapter.

Chapter 3.0: Project Description
Chapter 3.0 includes a discussion of the project’s geographical setting, the history of the planning area, the project’s goals, objectives, characteristics, and components, and the anticipated discretionary action for the project.

Chapter 4.0: Environmental Analysis, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures Chapter 4.0 includes an analysis of the proposed project’s environmental impacts. It is organized into the following topical sections: land use and planning, noise, and transportation/traffic. The

1 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2011. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas. Los Angeles County. September 2011.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» 2-15 environmental setting discussions describe the “existing conditions” of the environment in the planning area and in the vicinity of the site as they pertain to the environmental issues being analyzed (Section 15125 of the State CEQA Guidelines).

The project impact discussions identify and focus on the significant environmental effects of the proposed project. The direct and indirect significant effects of the proposed project on the environment are identified and described, giving due consideration to both the short-term and longterm effects, as necessary (Section 15126.2[a] of the State CEQA Guidelines).

Chapter 4.0 also includes a discussion of the cumulative effects of the proposed project within the analysis of each environmental topic when considered in combination with other projects, causing related impacts as required by Section 15130 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Cumulative impacts are based on the anticipated General Plan build out scenario.

Chapter 5.0: Alternatives to the Proposed Project
In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the alternatives discussion in Chapter 5.0 describes a reasonable range of alternatives that could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project and that are capable of eliminating any significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a less than significant level. The alternative analyzed in Chapter 5.0 includes the No Project Alternative. Other alternatives commonly considered, including the Reduced Project Alternative and the Alternate Location Alternative, are not applicable due to the nature of the proposed project being a policy/planning action that does not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development. The substantive reasons for the elimination of such alternatives are provided in this chapter. The environmentally superior alternative is also identified.

Chapter 6.0: Long-Term Implications of the Project
Chapter 6.0 includes CEQA-mandated discussions required by Section 15126.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines regarding: (a) significant irreversible environmental changes that would result from implementation of the proposed project, (b) significant adverse environmental impacts for which either no mitigation or only partial mitigation is feasible, and (c) growth-inducing impacts of the proposed project.

Chapter 7.0: List of Preparers and Persons Consulted
Chapter 7.0 provides a list of the preparers of the Draft EIR and the General Plan Noise Element, as well as persons consulted during preparation of the Draft EIR.

Chapter 8.0: References
Chapter 8.0 provides the references used in this Draft EIR.

2.6 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
As permitted in Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines, an EIR may reference all or portions of another document that is a matter of public record or is generally available to the public. Information from the documents that have been incorporated by reference has been briefly summarized in the

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
2 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\2.0 Introduction.docx «03/18/21» -16 appropriate sections of this Draft EIR, along with a description of how the public may obtain and review these documents. These documents include:
• City of Long Beach General Plan Elements (as amended) (website: http://www.longbeach. gov/lbds/planning/advance/general-plan/)
• City of Long Beach Municipal Code and other titles referenced herein (website: https://www. municode.com/library/ca/long_beach/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=16115) • Proposed Long Beach General Plan Noise Element (December 2019) (Appendix B) (website:
http://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/advance/general-plan/) Documents that are incorporated by reference are available for review at the website links noted above and at the City of Long Beach, Department of Development Services, 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Long Beach, California 90802.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-1

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts that may result from implementation of the proposed General Plan Noise Element Project and amendments to the City of Long Beach’s (City) Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Chapter 8.80), which regulates noise and implements the policies of the General Plan Noise Element (proposed project). As Lead Agency, the City has the authority for preparation of this Draft EIR and, after the comment/response process, certification of the Final EIR and approval of the proposed project as described in this Draft EIR. The City and Responsible Agencies have the authority to make decisions on discretionary actions related to the approval of the proposed project. This Draft EIR is intended to serve as an informational document to be considered by the City and the Responsible Agencies during deliberations on the proposed project. This Draft EIR evaluates for a reasonable worst-case scenario of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project and provides mitigation where necessary. The analysis in this Draft EIR is based on the General Plan Draft Noise Element (City of Long Beach, December 2019) (Appendix B).

3.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING
As illustrated in Figure 3-1, Project Location (figures provided at the end of this chapter), the location for the Noise Element project (also referred to as the “planning area”) encompasses the entire 50 square miles within the limits of the City of Long Beach (excluding the City of Signal Hill, which is completely surrounded by the City of Long Beach) in Los Angeles County (County), California. The City is bordered on the west by the Cities of Carson and Los Angeles (including Wilmington and the Port of Los Angeles); on the north by the Cities of Compton, Paramount, and Bellflower, and the unincorporated community of Rancho Dominguez; and on the east by the Cities of Lakewood, Hawaiian Gardens, Cypress, Los Alamitos, and Seal Beach, and the unincorporated community of Rossmoor. The Pacific Ocean borders the southern portion of the City, and as such, portions of the City are located within the California Coastal Zone.

In addition, a variety of bus transit routes maintained by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Long Beach Transit, and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) provide both regional and local access to and within the City. Metro also provides passenger rail service via the Blue Line, which connects the City to Metro’s regional transportation system throughout greater Los Angeles County. A variety of bicycle lanes and paths serve the City, including regional connections along PCH, the San Gabriel River pathway, and the Los Angeles River pathway.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -2

3.2 LONG BEACH GENERAL PLAN
The proposed project is the adoption of a new General Plan Noise Element (included as Appendix B of this Draft EIR), which would replace the City’s existing 1975 Noise Element. As required by Section 65302 of the California Government Code, the Noise Element is a required element of a City’s General Plan.

The Long Beach General Plan represents a comprehensive approach for managing the community’s future. The Long Beach General Plan also reflects the City’s long-term strategy for directing physical, economic, and cultural development. The General Plan is a legally binding policy document intended to serve as a guide for developers and communities and to inform decisions made by City officials regarding future development and the management of land and natural resources.

In relation to development, the Long Beach General Plan serves as a blueprint guiding the type of community the City desires for its future, and also provides the means by which that desired future can be attained. The General Plan establishes goals, policies, and a vision for the future and utilizes text, maps, and graphic illustrations to express the organization of the physical, environmental, economic, and social environment sought by the community in order to achieve a healthful, functional, and desirable place in which to reside and work.

3.2.1 State General Plan Requirements
Government Code Section 65302 et seq. requires that every city and county in the State of California (State) prepare and adopt a “comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and of any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency’s judgment bears relation to its planning.” As further mandated by the State, the General Plan must serve to:
• Identify land use, circulation, environmental, economic, and social goals and policies for the City and its surrounding planning area as they relate to land use and development; • Provide a framework within which both the City Planning Commission and the City Council can make land use decisions;
• Provide citizens the opportunity to participate in the planning and decision-making process affecting the City and its surrounding planning area; and • Inform citizens, developers, decision-makers, and other agencies, as appropriate, of the City's basic rules that will guide both environmental protection and land development decisions within the City and surrounding planning area.

State law requires that the General Plan include the following seven mandatory elements: Land Use, Circulation,
1 Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety. While these seven elements are 1 The Circulation Element, as required by State law, is titled the Mobility Element in the City’s current General Plan.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-3 required, State law also allows flexibility in how each local jurisdiction structures these elements. In addition to these seven elements, the existing Long Beach General Plan includes elements addressing the following issues beyond those required by State law: Historic Preservation, Air Quality, Seismic Safety, and Urban Design.
1 While State law does not mandate discussion of these
issues, once adopted, “optional” issues have the same force and effect as policies related to the General Plan elements required by the State. In addition, the City also has a certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) governing land use in coastal areas of the City. As required by the California Coastal Act, the City’s LCP is consistent with the land use plan, goals, objectives, and policies established in the City’s General Plan.

Government Code Section 65040.2 requires the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to adopt and periodically revise the General Plan Guidelines (GPG). The 2017 GPG are used to guide cities and counties in the State regarding the preparation and content of general plans. In order to streamline the process and reduce costs associated with adopting or amending a general plan, the 2017 GPG provides free online tools and resources, promotes increased use of online data, and includes templates and sample policies.

Government Code Section 65302(f) states that a Noise Element should identify and assess noise problems in the community. Specifically, the noise element should analyze and quantify current and projected noise levels for the following sources:
• Highways and freeways;
• Primary arterials and major local streets;
• Passenger and freight online railroad operations and ground rapid transit systems; • Commercial, general aviation, heliport, helistop, and military airport operations, aircraft overflights, jet engine test stands, and all other ground facilities and maintenance functions related to airport operation;
• Local industrial plants, including, but not limited to, railroad classification yards; and • Other ground stationary noise sources, including, but not limited to, military installations, identified by local agencies as contributing to the community noise environment.

Noise contours should be shown for the above sources and stated in terms of community noise equivalent level (CNEL) or day-night average level (Ldn). Additionally, the noise contours should be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses in the Land Use Element that minimizes the exposure of community residents to excessive noise. Further, the Noise Element should include implementation measures and feasible solutions that address existing and foreseeable noise problems. Once adopted, this Noise Element will carry the same legal weight as any of the seven 1 The City of Long Beach General Plan Urban Design Element (UDE) was adopted in December 2019 and replaced the 1975 Scenic Routes Element.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -4 mandatory elements and will be consistent with all the other elements, as required by Government Code Section 65300.5.

3.2.2 General Plan Consistency
In addition to providing a comprehensive strategy for directing future growth, State law mandates that the General Plan be internally consistent. Specifically, Government Code Section 65300.5 requires the various components of a General Plan to, “comprise an integrated, internally consistent and compatible statement of policies.” The three primary components required to maintain internal General Plan consistency are as follows:

1. Equal Status among General Plan Elements. All elements of a General Plan have equal status and no one General Plan element takes precedence over any other. As such, the General Plan elements must be consistent in order to avoid potential conflicts between or among the elements.

2. Consistency between Elements and within Individual Elements. All General Plan elements must be consistent with each other. For example, policies and implementation strategies outlined in one General Plan element must not require or encourage an action that would be prohibited or discouraged by policies and implementation strategies in another General Plan element.

3. General Plan Text, Diagram, and Map Consistency. Text, diagrams, and maps must be consistent with one another and with goals and policies outlined in all elements of the General Plan.

The Noise Element interrelates with policies in other elements of the General Plan, including the Land Use Element, the Urban Design Element, the Housing Element, the Mobility Element, and the Open Space Element. The interrelationship between the Noise Element and the five other elements should be acknowledged in order to prepare an integrated General Plan. The relationship between noise and the aforementioned elements is described below. • Land Use Element. In December 2019, the City adopted a new Land Use Element (LUE), which replaced the previous 1989 LUE. The updated LUE introduces the concept of “PlaceTypes,” which replaces the previous land use approach of segregating property within the City through traditional land use designations and zoning classifications. The LUE establishes 14 primary PlaceTypes that aim to divide the City into distinct neighborhoods, thus allowing for greater flexibility and a mix of compatible land uses within these areas. Each PlaceType is defined by unique land use, form, and character-defining goals, policies, and implementation strategies tailored specifically to the particular application of that PlaceType within the City. The future noise contours presented in the proposed Noise Element are consistent with assumptions made in the LUE. The proposed Noise Element provides existing and future noise contours that may be used, along with the LUE, to evaluate future land use proposals. • Urban Design Element. In December 2019, the City adopted the Urban Design Element (UDE), which replaced the 1975 Scenic Routes Element. The UDE defines the physical aspects of the urban environment. Specifically, the UDE aims to further enhance the City’s PlaceTypes

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-5 established in the LUE by creating great places; improving the urban fabric, and public spaces; and defining edges, thoroughfares, and corridors. In addition, the City intends to utilize the UDE to foster healthy, sustainable neighborhoods; promote compact and connected development; minimize and fill in gaps in the urban fabric of existing neighborhoods; improve the cohesion between buildings, roadways, public spaces, and people; and improve the economic vitality of the City. Urban design techniques and policies, such as incorporation of noise attenuation methods, can be employed to mitigate noise impacts and are included in both the UDE and proposed Noise Element.
• Housing Element. The 2014 Housing Element covers an eight-year planning period (from October 15, 2013, to October 15, 2021) and includes discussion regarding adequate sites for new housing and standards for housing stock. The Housing Element identifies policies, programs, and objectives that focus on conserving and improving existing affordable housing; providing adequate sites for new housing; assisting in development of affordable housing; removing governmental constraints to housing development; and promoting equal housing opportunities. Since residential uses are considered noise sensitive, the noise exposure and contour information provided in the Noise Element can be utilized for future planning efforts, and helps to identity potential noise constraints.
• Mobility Element. The 2013 Mobility Element focuses on improving the quality of life for Long Beach residents through transportation and mobility planning. The future noise contours presented in the proposed Noise Element are consistent with assumptions made in the Mobility Element.
• Open Space Element. The 2002 Open Space Element covers four topic areas related to open space: the preservation of natural resources, the managed production of resources, public health and safety, and outdoor recreation. Excessive noise can adversely affect the enjoyment of recreation activities in designated open space. As such, noise exposure levels should be considered when planning open space. Conversely, open space can be used to buffer sensitive land uses from noise sources through the use of setbacks and landscaping.

It is also important to note that the General Plan aims to balance competing objectives and community priorities. As such, in interpreting goals, policies, and implementation strategies in the General Plan, care must be given to determine the “best fit” for the action to be taken, aimed towards achieving the City’s short-term and long-term priorities.

3.2.3 Comprehensive Nature of the General Plan
The Long Beach General Plan establishes goals, policies, and implementation strategies aimed at guiding the physical, social, environmental, and economic environments. In addition to addressing the State-mandated components of a General Plan, the Long Beach General Plan also responds to current and future issues the City faces. In order to fully address these issues, the Long Beach General Plan planning area encompasses the current City limits, while also keeping in mind the regional context of its planning efforts. For example, certain issues such as traffic, transit, air quality, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have both a local and regional component. In such cases, the

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -6 General Plan addresses the degree to which the City’s interests, values, and concerns are congruent or conflict with existing regional policies. Furthermore, it is also the role of the Long Beach General Plan to define the extent to which the City can address local issues as well as those issues that require cooperative actions among several jurisdictions.

3.3 PROJECT HISTORY

3.3.1 Noise Element Update
The City’s Noise Element was last updated in 1975, and at that time, it was implemented through a 1977 Noise Ordinance. Since then, the City's physical development, population, regional context, and the regulatory guidance involving noise have changed significantly. In order to allow for increased flexibility in responding to such changes, the City proposes to update and replace the existing 1975 Noise Element with a new Noise Element.

The Noise Element update will also incorporate and respond to important policy objectives of the General Plan Land Use Element (LUE), adopted in December 2019, which encourages mixed land uses. This is critical to the broader goal of attaining more sustainable development patterns in the future by better linking land use and transportation, allowing residents and employees to live and work in proximity to the goods and services they access on a daily basis, and encouraging the colocation of jobs and housing. Because of the nature of noise levels, some degree of elevated noise is anticipated to allow the range of previously mentioned uses to co-exist; the Noise Element update seeks to balance goals to maintain a healthy noise environment with the ability to achieve the above-stated objectives contained in the recently updated LUE, which include the sustainable development patterns and economic development derived from mixed land uses and accommodating an array of regional and visitor-serving uses.

The Noise Element update will accomplish the following:
• Guide physical development in the City based on the projected population increases through the year 2040;
• Provide a tailored approach to noise policy across neighborhoods, recognizing the unique characteristics of areas that are currently or anticipated to contain more mixed uses, such as Downtown, major transportation corridor environments, and major activity centers in the City; • Limit noise exposure, particularly in areas with nearby housing, hospital, school or day care center uses;
• Improve the health of City residents through urban planning approaches; and • Respond to changing technologies.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-7

3.3.2 Initial Study/Notice of Preparation
The City, as the Lead Agency, prepared an Initial Study (IS) and issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for an EIR for the proposed project on May 17, 2019, which was distributed via the State Clearinghouse (SCH). In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15082, the NOP was circulated to responsible agencies and individuals for a period of 32 days, during which time written comments were solicited pertaining to environmental issues and topics that the Draft EIR should evaluate.

On May 30, 2019, a public meeting was held at the Bixby Park Community Center, located at 130 Cherry Avenue in Long Beach. The meeting functioned as a joint open house/scoping meeting intended to solicit input regarding the proposed Noise Element, as well as input regarding the scope and content of this Draft EIR.

A total of 53 public comment letters were received at the public scoping meeting and during the public review period or shortly thereafter. Many of the comment letters received were related to a study that was concurrently being prepared on noise and noise management of special events taking place within the City and did not contain comments related to the scope and content of the Draft EIR.

For more discussion regarding the IS/NOP prepared for the project and the scoping process, refer to Chapter 1.0, Introduction.

3.3.3 Special Events
On April 17, 2018, in response to concerns about special events noise voiced by Downtown residents living within proximity of the City’s waterfront, the Long Beach City Council directed City staff to prepare a Special Events Noise Study in order to better understand noise impacts related to special events. The report was released to the public by the City on July 17, 2019, and outlined best practices that the City could implement to better manage noise from special events—a number of which have already been implemented by the City. Those best practices include strategies such as improving interdepartmental coordination among departments, which regulate special events noise and respond to noise complaints; installing professional sound level meters to monitor decibel levels during special events and making decibel readings publicly available; and generally improving outreach and notification to residents. The study also informed the update to the City’s General Plan Noise Element.

3.4 PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed project is a new General Plan Noise Element, which would replace the City’s existing 1975 Noise Element. As required by Section 65302 of the California Government Code, the Noise Element is a required element of a City’s General Plan. The following discussion summarizes the key components of the proposed Noise Element.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -8

3.4.1 Project Summary
The proposed project includes the approval of an updated Noise Element for incorporation into the City’s General Plan. The proposed Noise Element includes strategies and policies intended to provide protection for land uses, as identified in the LUE, from excessive noise and vibration sources, as well as to implement the vision of a healthy, livable noise environment in the City.

The proposed project would also include several amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.80, Noise).

3.4.2 Project Objectives
The City has established the following intended objectives, which would aid decision-makers in their review of the project and its associated environmental impacts:

1. Create and maintain a healthy noise environment in Long Beach.

2. Balance business practices within dynamic, active, and engaging areas to promote activity, including special events, while respecting adjacent sensitive uses.

3. Create allowances associated with noise so that Long Beach can thrive as a dynamic, growing city.

4. Limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels in noise-sensitive areas and at noise-sensitive times of day.

5. Strive for a more equitable distribution of noise.

6. Apply site planning, building design, street design, and other design strategies to reduce noise impacts.

7. Continue to actively enhance the regulation and management of noise to improve procedures and minimize noise impacts.

8. Generally maintain the current allowable interior and exterior noise thresholds as identified in the City Municipal Code Chapter 8.80, while better accommodating mixed land uses as contemplated by the recently updated General Plan Land Use Element.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-9

3.4.3 Proposed Noise Element

3.4.3.1 Project Strategies
As part of the Noise Element, the City has established the following strategies related to noise, which would aid review of future projects and their associated environmental impacts:

1. Apply site planning and other design strategies to reduce noise impacts, especially within the Founding and Contemporary Neighborhoods, Multifamily Residential – Low and Moderate, and Neighborhood-Serving Centers and Corridors – Low and Moderate PlaceTypes.

2. Create a balance of business practices within dynamic, active, and engaging areas such as the Transit-Oriented Development – Low and Moderate, Downtown, and Waterfront PlaceType areas to promote activity while respecting adjacent sensitive uses.

3. Capitalize on urban design techniques and business operation strategies within business and employment center PlaceTypes (Community Commercial, Industrial, Neo-Industrial, RegionalServing Facility, and Port of Long Beach) to minimize noise impacts on surrounding adjacent uses.

4. Protect and buffer noise sensitive areas and uses through effective building design and material selection.

5. Implement best practices to reduce impacts of noise from industrial sources.

6. Minimize vehicular traffic noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses.

7. Promote alternative forms of mobility to reduce noise generated from vehicular traffic.

8. Implement street design and maintenance practices to minimize vehicular noise impacts.

9. Minimize train noise in residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses.

10. While the operations of airports and airport related uses are noisy by nature, the adverse effects of aircraft-related noise should be minimized.

11. Minimize watercraft noise level impacts to residential areas and in other locations near noisesensitive uses, where possible.

12. Minimize construction noise and vibration levels in residential areas and in other locations near noise-sensitive uses where possible.

13. Balance the needs of special events while prioritizing the well-being of residents.

14. Ensure meaningful participation in the public process by all members of the community, especially historically excluded or marginalized groups.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -10

15. Reduce the disproportionate environmental noise burdens affecting low-income and minority populations.

16. Continue to actively enhance the regulation and management of noise to improve procedures and minimize noise impacts.

In addition to these 16 strategies, the proposed Noise Element contains numerous policies that work together to achieve the goals of creating a healthy, livable community with the equitable distribution of noise, minimizing exposures to excessive noise, and allowances for elements necessary for a dynamic, growing city. These citywide policies aim to provide a holistic and comprehensive guide for the City, whereas future projects facilitated by project approval would provide a refined direction for distinct areas within the City.

3.4.3.2 Noise Plan
Chapter 5 of the proposed Noise Element includes a Noise Plan, which addresses strategies and policies related to six topic areas describing sources of existing noise and vibration: (1) PlaceType Characteristics and Land Use Compatibility; (2) Mobility, including vehicular noise, rail, aircraft, and watercraft; (3) Construction; (4) Special Events; (5) Environmental Justice and Social Equity; and (6) Noise Management. Figure 3-2, Existing Major Sources of Noise, shows existing major sources of noise in the planning area. Each of these six topic areas will be discussed in more detail below. (1) PlaceType Characteristics and Land Use Compatibility. As noted previously, the updated LUE allows for a greater mix of land uses throughout the City through the establishment of PlaceTypes in place of standard parcel-by-parcel land use designations. The PlaceTypes allow for greater flexibility and a mix of compatible land uses to create more complete communities comprised of residential neighborhoods, employment centers, and open space areas. PlaceTypes identified within the LUE establish neighborhood form, character, and community scaled districts structured around development patterns, streetscape design, and urban form. In addition, these PlaceTypes range in development intensity and activity. Policies in the proposed Noise Element correspond to the LUE PlaceTypes that reflect differentiated area characteristics. Refer to Strategy Nos. 1 through 5 in Section 2.4.2, Project Strategies, related to PlaceType characteristics and land use compatibility.

The 14 PlaceTypes included in the LUE are illustrated in Figure 3-3, Land Use Element PlaceTypes, and described in further detail below.

1. Open Space PlaceType. The Open Space (OS) PlaceType aims to promote and conserve the emotional and physical health of the City’s residents through the provision of natural environments, which include recreational open space; scenic, natural, or cultural features; and utilities and/or infrastructure with environmentally sensitive resources. Allowable uses within this PlaceType include parks, beaches, golf courses, marinas, flood control channels and basins, rivers, utility rights-of-way, oil islands, inland bodies of water, nature preserves, marine habitats, estuaries, wetlands, lagoons, and limited commercial recreation uses that support existing programs and facilities.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-11

2. Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood PlaceType. The Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood (FCN) PlaceType represents the City’s low-density residential neighborhoods, from older street car urban neighborhoods (Founding Neighborhoods) to post-World War II suburban housing (Contemporary Neighborhoods), which are predominantly characterized by single-family uses separated by large commercial centers. 3–4. Multi-Family Residential—Low and Moderate PlaceTypes. The Multi-Family Residential (MFRL and MFR-M) PlaceTypes aim to provide a variety of housing options (i.e., condominium duplex, triplex, and garden apartment uses) adjacent to neighborhood-serving commercial uses to meet the range of lifestyles of the City’s community members. 5–6. Neighborhood-Serving Centers and Corridors—Low and Moderate PlaceTypes. Commercial corridors and centers are located throughout the City. As such, the Neighborhood-Serving Centers and Corridors (NSC-L and NSC-M) PlaceTypes aim to locate low- to moderate- intensity mixed uses (i.e., residential/retail) near these areas in an effort to provide goods and services near housing.
7–8. Transit-Oriented Development—Low and Moderate PlaceTypes. The City is currently served by bus, shuttle, and other transit services. In particular, the Metro Blue Line light rail has a significant presence along Long Beach Boulevard and the City’s Downtown area. As such, the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD-L and TOD-M) PlaceTypes aim to provide multi-family residential uses near areas adjacent to the Metro Blue Line and the continuation of mixed-uses (residential and community-serving commercial uses) at a higher intensity to promote a pedestrian-friendly, active streetscape.

9. Community Commercial PlaceType. The Community Commercial (CC) PlaceType allows for auto-oriented commercial development along primary arterials in the City, with residential uses strictly prohibited. Allowable uses within this PlaceType include commercial uses that serve community-based needs for goods and services.

10. Industrial PlaceType. The Industrial (I) PlaceType would allow for light industrial research parks, warehousing or storage activities, industrial manufacturing, and machining operations in areas generally separated from residential uses. Allowable uses within this PlaceType include research and development activities, storage, industrial, and manufacturing activities, tank farms, and oil-drilling activities.

11. Neo-Industrial PlaceType. The Neo-Industrial (NI) PlaceType encourages light industrial activities, particularly those related to innovative start-up businesses and creative design offices in the arts, engineering, sciences, technology, media, education, and information industries. Allowable uses within this PlaceType include light industrial, clean manufacturing, offices, commercial uses to support business endeavors, and repurposed buildings with live/ work artist studios.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -12

12. Regional-Serving Facility PlaceType. Due to its size and location between the City of Los Angeles and the County of Orange, the City of Long Beach is home to a variety of regionalserving facilities that serve the sub-region and region. Primary examples of these facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: medical centers; the Port of Long Beach; Long Beach City College; the Long Beach Airport; California State University Long Beach; the Department of Motor Vehicles; the City’s Health Department; and Ability First (provides programs for children and adults with disabilities or special needs). Allowable uses within this Regional-Serving Facility (RSF) PlaceType include medical centers, higher education campuses, port services, airport uses, regional destination retail centers (i.e., Douglas Park) and recreation uses, public facilities, and the Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP) area.

13. Downtown PlaceType. The Downtown (DT) PlaceType encompasses the area overlooking the Pacific Ocean where the Los Angeles River and the Port of Long Beach meet. In its existing setting, the Downtown area consists of offices, and government and tourism uses, and is home to several historic and cultural districts. The 2012 Downtown Plan currently serves as the land use plan guiding development in the Downtown area.

14. Waterfront PlaceType. The Waterfront (WF) PlaceType includes three primary areas along the City’s shoreline, including the Downtown Shoreline Area waterfront, Alamitos Bay Marina, and the Belmont Pier and Pool Complex area. Specifically, the Waterfront PlaceType would encourage high-intensity, compact, and diverse uses (e.g., housing, offices, hotels, and tourism attractions) in the Downtown Shoreline Area (e.g., the Queen Mary and the Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific).
(2) Mobility. The planning area includes multiple sources of noise related to mobility, including vehicles, rail, aircraft, and watercraft. Figure 3-4, Future Traffic Noise Contours (2040), shows the future traffic noise contours, which are consistent with the LUE and Mobility Element assumptions.

For more detailed future traffic noise contours, see Figures 4.2-1(a) through 4.2-1(e) in Section 4.2, Noise. Table 3.1, below, identifies allowable interior and exterior noise exposure levels from transportation sources for various land uses proposed by the Noise Element.

Strategy Nos. 6 through 11, in Section 3.4.2, Project Strategies, are aimed at managing mobilityrelated noise. (3) Construction. Construction activities are a recurrent source of noise throughout the planning area, the duration of which can range in length from a few hours to several months. The type of construction equipment and duration of activities greatly affect the amount of noise and vibration created. Typical construction activities include hauling materials, site preparation, grading, building erection, and other specialized construction activities. Construction activities are regulated by the City’s Municipal Code, which limits typical construction activities to occur Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Strategy No. 12 in Section 3.4.2, Project Strategies, above, is aimed at managing constructionrelated noise.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-13 Table 3.1: Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure from Transportation Sources PlaceType Uses
CNEL (dBA)
Interior¹
,
² Exterior³
Open Space
 Open Space (OS)
Playgrounds, neighborhood parks N/A 70
Golf Courses, riding stables, water
recreation, cemeteries

N/A N/A
Neighborhoods
 Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood (N)
 Multi-Family Residential-Low (MRF-L)
 Multi-Family Residential-Moderate (MRF-M)
Single-family, duplex and multiplefamily45 65
Mobile home park N/A 65
Mixed-Use
 Neighborhood-Serving Center or Corridor – Low
(NC-L)
 Neighborhood-Serving Center or Corridor – Low
(NC-M)
 Transit-Oriented Development – Low (TOD-L)
 Transit-Oriented Development – Moderate (TOD-M)
Single-family 45 65
Mobile home park N/A 65
Multiple-family, mixed-use 45 654
Transient lodging-motels, hotels 45 65
Sports arenas, outdoor spectator
sports

N/A N/A
Auditoriums, concert halls,
amphitheaters
45 N/A
Office buildings, business, commercial
and professional
50 N/A
Employment
 Community Commercial (CC)
 Industrial (I)
 Neo-Industrial (NI)
Manufacturing, utilities, agriculture N/A N/A
Office buildings, business, commercial
and professional
50 N/A
Unique
 Regional Serving Facility (RSF)
 Downtown (DT)
 Waterfront (WF)
Schools, nursing homes, day care
facilities, hospitals, convalescent
facilities, dormitories
45 65
Government Facilities – offices, fire
stations, community buildings
45 N/A
Places of Worship, churches 45 N/A
Libraries 45 N/A
Multiple-family, mixed-use 45 654
Utilities N/A N/A
Cemeteries N/A N/A
Source: Proposed Long Beach General Plan Noise Element, Table N-5 (December 2019). 1 Interior habitable environment excludes bathrooms, closets, and corridors. 2 Interior noise standards shall be satisfied with windows in the closed position. Mechanical ventilation shall be provided per Uniform Building Code requirements.
³ Exterior noise level standard to be applied at outdoor activity areas (e.g., private yards, private patio, or balcony of a multifamily residence). Where the location of an outdoor activity area is unknown or not applicable, the noise standard shall be applied inside the property line of the receiving land use. 4 Within the NC-M, TOD-L, TOD-M, DT and WF PlaceType designations, exterior space standards apply only to common outdoor recreational areas.

CNEL = community noise equivalent level
dBA = A-weighted decibels
N/A = not applicable

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -14 (4) Special Events. Special events regularly occur within the planning area, including community festivals, runs/walks, holiday celebrations, the Long Beach Grand Prix, the Long Beach Marathon, the Long Beach Lesbian and Gay Pride Parade and Celebration, the Jazz Festival, film production, and events hosted at the Queen Mary and the Convention Center. Special events provide benefits to the City, including economic development and tourism; however, noise may be a concern for residents living in close proximity to special events. As such, the Noise Element aims to manage the distribution and intensity of noise from special events in order to prioritize the wellbeing of residents.

Strategy No. 13, in Section 3.4.2, Project Strategies, above, is aimed at managing noise related to special events.
(5) Environmental Equity and Social Justice. Creating a more equitable distribution of noise is one of the four primary goals of the proposed Noise Element. Environmental justice ensures the equitable treatment and meaningful participation of marginalized groups, as well as enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies as they may disproportionately affect these groups.

Environmental justice and social equity, as they relate to noise, are important aspects of planning for a healthy noise environment for all residents of the City.

Strategy Nos. 14 and 15, in Section 3.4.2, Project Strategies, above, are aimed at managing noise impacts related to environmental justice and social equity. (6) Noise Management. The City is responsible for regulating noise and creating buffers from sources of noise to surrounding noise-sensitive uses. Noise regulations can be managed and imposed through ensuring compliance with CEQA on a project-specific basis. Through the review of discretionary projects and in compliance with CEQA, noise mitigation measures are formulated to limit and reduce excessive noise.

Strategy No. 16, in Section 3.4.2, Project Strategies, above, discusses minimizing noise impacts through management and regulation.

3.4.3.3 Administration and Implementation
Chapter 6 of the proposed Noise Element includes implementation measures (comprised of tools and strategies), which are intended to be used to effectively implement the goals and policies contained in the Noise Plan. Implementation tools consist of the City’s regulatory processes, such as zoning regulations, the Noise Ordinance (which is being updated as part of this project), development review, building and housing codes, CEQA compliance, City noise procedures and management, interagency coordination, and enforcement. The implementation strategies summarize goals and policies from the Noise Plan and identify the responsible City departments and general timeframes for completion. Periodic progress reports will be prepared every two to three years to ensure that the City is adhering to implementation strategies outlined in the Noise Element.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-15

3.4.4 Proposed Noise Ordinance Amendments
The City of Long Beach Noise Ordinance is contained in Title 8, Health and Safety, Chapter 8.80, Noise, of the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter 8.80, Noise, establishes exterior and interior noise limits for the generation of sound within the City. The maximum noise levels vary based on the receiving land use type and the cumulative duration of noise.

As outlined in the following subsections, several amendments to the Noise Ordinance would be included as part of the proposed project. Deletions are shown with strikethrough, and additions are shown with underline.

3.4.4.1 Municipal Code Section 8.80.030
In Long Beach Municipal Code Section 8.80.030, Administration and Enforcement, the following underlined text would be added to clarify and expand the capacity of the Noise Control Officer, which would streamline departmental responsibilities and administrative processes:

All departments with noise regulation responsibilities may, based on circumstance and need, carry out the duties of the Noise Control Officer to help ensure that noise complaints from the public are adequately addressed. This includes, but is not limited to, taking noise measurements and acting as a case manager, upon receiving a noise complaint. Such duties may include coordination with relevant departments and public agencies as appropriate and conduct other actions necessary to facilitate resolution of the noise complaint.

3.4.4.2 Municipal Code Section 8.80.150
Section 8.80.150 of the Long Beach Municipal Code, Exterior noise limits—Sound levels by receiving land use district, regulates exterior noise limits by receiving land uses, which are delineated by noise districts, as shown in the Noise District Map found in Section 8.80.160. Proposed amendments to the Noise Ordinance include updates to the boundaries of the noise districts to better reflect and be consistent with the recently adopted General Plan Land Use Element (LUE) PlaceTypes. The General Plan LUE PlaceTypes established a number of mixed-use PlaceTypes that delineate areas that are currently mixed-use in nature and that are planned or anticipated to be more mixed-use in the future, and where commercial, residential, and other compatible land uses will be integrated. Refer to Figure 3-5, Proposed Noise District Map, which shows the proposed refinements to the noise district boundaries.

Currently, District Two consists of areas that contain predominantly commercial uses with other land use types also present. The proposed update to the Noise District Map expands District Two boundaries to better capture areas that currently are characterized by mixed-use development or are planned for mixed uses and commercial uses in the future. Largely, this is accomplished by refining District Two boundaries and adding mixed use as a land use type in existing Table A in

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -16 Section 8.80.160 and Table C in Section 8.80.170 of the City’s Municipal Code, with the corresponding maximum allowable daytime and nighttime decibel levels shown in Table 3.2, Exterior Noise Limits, and Table 3.3, Interior Noise Limits, below, respectively. These proposed changes maintain current standards for indoor and outdoor noise limits for residential and other noise-sensitive land uses such as schools. The total area of District Two, including its expanded boundaries, is limited to a total of 4 percent of the City’s land area.

The areas included in the District Two boundaries were determined based on geography, PlaceType, and existing and anticipated activity centers and development patterns. Geographically, the proposed District Two boundaries expand upon the existing area to include additional portions of Downtown, Midtown, Central, and West Long Beach and key Waterfront areas, as well as portions of Belmont Shore. Based on PlaceType, the proposed area of District Two generally includes areas found in the Downtown (DT), Waterfront (WF), Transit-Oriented Development Moderate Density (TOD-M), Transit-Oriented Development Low Density (TOD-L) PlaceTypes and a select area in the Neighborhood Serving Center or Corridor – Low Density (NSC-L) PlaceType. In general, these areas tend to be high intensity, mixed-use areas that are served by transit, function as regional destinations, and incorporate visitor-serving uses. For example, the areas that have the Waterfront (WF) PlaceType that are included in District Two encompass uses such as the Queen Mary, the Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific, and Shoreline Village. Second Street, between Livingston Drive and Bay Shore Avenue in Belmont Shore, is included within proposed District Two as a major pedestrian commercial area (“Area D” of the Coastal Zone) within the City. The Belmont Pool Complex and nearby major retail center are also included within proposed District Two. As proposed, District Two would not include any areas designated primarily for residential uses (such as Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood [FCN] and Multi-Family Residential – Low and Moderate [MFR-L and MFR-M]). The proposed expansion of District Two is intended to include existing and planned areas designated for mixed-use and major activity centers in the City to align noise districts with the relevant LUE PlaceTypes.

3.4.4.3 Municipal Code Section 8.80.160
Table A, Exterior Noise Limits, in Long Beach Municipal Code Section 8.80.160, Exterior noise limits— Correction for character of sound, would be updated to include mixed-use land uses under District Two. Table 3.2, Exterior Noise Limits, below, shows the proposed text amendment. In this table, District Two is modified to be defined as “Mixed-use or predominantly commercial with other land use types also present.” This change implements in the Municipal Code the expansion of District Two as described in Section 3.4.4.2, above.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx «03/12/21» 3-17 Table 3.2: Exterior Noise Limits
Receiving Land Use District
Maximum Noise Criteria (dB Lmax)
Daytime
(7:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m.)
Nighttime
(10:00 p.m. to
7:00 a.m.)
District One — Predominantly residential with other land use types also present 50 45 District Two — Mixed-use or pPredominantly commercial with other land use types also present 60 55
District Three1 — Predominantly industrial with other land use types also present 65 65 District Four1 — Predominantly industrial with other land types use also present 70 70 District Five — Airport, freeways, and waterways regulated by other agencies Regulated by other agencies and laws
Source: City of Long Beach Municipal Code, Section 8.80.160, Table A, Exterior Noise Limits (adopted 1977, amended 2009). 1 Districts Three and Four limits are intended primarily for use at their boundaries rather than for noise control within those districts. dB = decibel(s)
Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level

3.4.4.4 Municipal Code Section 8.80.170
Table C in Long Beach Municipal Code Section 8.80.170, Interior noise limits—Maximum sound levels, would be updated to include interior noise limits for mixed uses. Table 3.3, Interior Noise Limits, below, shows the proposed text amendment. As shown in Table 3.3, the mixed-use land use district is introduced into the table with interior noise limits of 45 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (nighttime) and 50 dBA from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (daytime). This is based on existing allowable interior noise levels (dBA) for the residential land use district.

Table 3.3: Interior Noise Limits
Receiving Land Use District Type of Land Use Time Interval Allowable Interior Noise Level (dBA)
All Residential 10:00 p.m.–7:00 a.m. 35
7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m. 45
All Mixed-Use 10:00 p.m.–7:00 a.m. 45
7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m. 50
All School 7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m.
(while school is in session) 45
Hospitals and designated quiet
zones, and noise-sensitive zones Any time 40
Source: City of Long Beach Municipal Code, Section 8.80.170, Table C (adopted 1977, amended 2009). dBA = A-weighted decibel(s)
Similar to the proposed changes to exterior noise levels, the proposed changes maintain current standards for interior noise levels for residential uses and schools and add a “mixed-use” land use type with corresponding maximum daytime and nighttime decibel levels.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -18

3.4.5 Project Design Feature
A Project Design Feature (PDF) is a specific component of the proposed project that has been incorporated in the project design to reduce potential environmental effects. This PDF is a part of the proposed project and does not constitute a mitigation measure. It is, however, included in this Draft EIR because it is intended to reduce potential project impacts. If applicable, PDFs are also described in the relevant sections of Chapter 4.0 for reduction of environmental effects of the proposed project. PDFs are not included for each environmental topic.

Project Design Feature 4.1.1 To ensure that the proposed project complies with and would not conflict with or impede the City of Long Beach (City) Municipal Code, including the Noise Ordinance, the project shall implement a program to amend the Municipal Code to ensure that changes facilitated by the adopted Noise Element are consistent with the Municipal Code. The program to amend the Municipal Code shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Director of Development Services, or designee. All inconsistencies between the Noise Element and Municipal Code shall be resolved through text amendments within 36 months following project approval.

3.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS, PERMITS, AND OTHER APPROVALS In accordance with Sections 15050 and 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City is the designated Lead Agency for the proposed project and has principal authority and jurisdiction for CEQA actions and project approval. Responsible Agencies are those agencies that have jurisdiction or authority over one or more aspects associated with the development of a proposed project and/or mitigation. Trustee Agencies are State agencies that have jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a proposed project.

The discretionary actions to be considered by the City as a part of the proposed project include:
• General Plan Update/Amendment: The project would require amendments to the City’s General Plan to replace the existing General Plan Noise Element with a new General Plan Noise Element.
• Noise Ordinance Amendment: The project would require adoption of an ordinance amending the City’s Noise Ordinance to ensure consistency with the updated Noise Element. • Municipal Code Amendment(s): The project may require ordinances amending additional sections of the City’s Municipal Code, related to noise, to ensure consistency with the updated Noise Element.
• Certification of the EIR: The project would require certification of the EIR and adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

City of
Downey
City of
Lynwood
City of
Santa Fe
Springs
City of
La Palma
City of
Artesia
City of
Bellflower
City of
Carson
City of
Cerritos
City of
Compton
City of
Hawaiian
Gardens
City of
Lakewood City of
Long
Beach
City of
Los Angeles
City of
Norwalk
City of
Paramount
City of
Seal
Beach
City of
Cypress
City of Los
Alamitos
City of
Huntington
Beach
ÄÆ22
ÄÆ47
ÄÆ1
ÄÆ19
ÄÆ91
§¨5
§¨605
§¨710
§¨405
Project Area (City of Long Beach)
SOURCE: Bing Maps (c. 2008); ESRI (2008)
FIGURE 3-1
Long Beach General Plan
Noise Element
Project Location
0 1 2
MILES
LEGEND
I:\CLB1901\G\Project_Loc.cdr (5/28/2019)
City of
Signal
Hill
County of
Los Angeles
City of
Signal
Hill

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -20 This page intentionally left blank
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,
NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong
Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
§¨710
§¨710
§¨405
§¨405
§¨605
ÄÆ91
SOURCE: Esri (2016); LSA (5/2017)
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Long Beach Airport
Port of Long Beach
Industrial Area
Freeway
Metro Blue Line
Freight Line
0 0.75 1.5
MILES
FIGURE 3-2
Existing Major Sources of Noise
Long Beach General Plan
Noise Element
I:\CLB1901\G\Existing Noise Sources.cdr (5/28/2019)

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -22 This page intentionally left blank
Legend
OS - Open Space
N - Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood
Neighborhoods
Employment
Unique
Mixed Use
MFR -L - Multi-Family Residential - Low
MFR -M - Multi-Family Residential - Moderate
NSC-L - Neighborhood-Serving Center or Corridor - Low
NSC-M - Neighborhood-Serving Center or Corridor - Moderate TOD -L - Transit-Oriented Development - Low
TOD -M - Transit-Oriented Development - Moderate
CC - Community Commercial Metro Blue Line Station
I - Industrial and 1/4 Mile Radius
NI - Neo-Industrial
RSF - Regional-Serving Facility
DT - Downtown
WF - Waterfront
PlaceTypes Light Rail Transit
Land Use Element PlaceTypes
I:\CLB1901\G\Project Placetypes.cdr (1/14/2020)
N
Long Beach General Plan
Noise Element MILE
0 .5 1
SOURCE: Long Beach General Plan Land Use Element, December 2019 FIGURE 3-3

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -24 This page intentionally left blank
LEGEND
Long Beach City Boundary
Future 2040 Traffic Noise Contours
70 dBA Ldn
75 dBA Ldn
80 dBA Ldn
85 dBA Ldn
FIGURE 3-4
Future Traffic Noise Contours (2040)
I:\CLB1901\G\Future Noise Contours.cdr (5/28/2019)
Long Beach General Plan
Noise Element
N
55 dBA Ldn
60 dBA Ldn
0 0.75 1.5
65 dBA Ldn
MILES
SOURCE: City of Long Beach General Plan Noise Element, Dec. 2019

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -26 This page intentionally left blank
FEET
0 3300 6600
N
FIGURE 3-5
Proposed Noise District Map
I:\CLB1901\G\Proposed Noise District.cdr (1/14/2020)
Long Beach General Plan
Noise Element
SOURCE: City of Long Beach Development Services

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021
3 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\3.0 Project Description.docx (03/12/21) -28 This page intentionally left blank

C I T Y O F L O N G BE A C H
MA R C H 2021

DR A F T EN V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T RE P O R T

GE N E R A L P L A N NO I S E EL E M E N T
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.0 Existing Environmental Setting.docx «03/12/21» 4-1

4.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS,

IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The following chapter contains three sections, each of which addresses one environmental topic outlined in Appendix G of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines) (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000–15397).

For each environmental topic analyzed, the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) includes a detailed explanation of the existing conditions, thresholds of significance that will be applied to determine whether the proposed General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80) (proposed project) impacts are significant or less than significant, analysis of the environmental impacts, and a determination of whether the proposed project would have a significant impact if implemented. A “significant impact” or “significant effect” means “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project” (14 CCR 15382). Each environmental topic section in Chapter 4.0 also includes a discussion of the cumulative effects of the project when considered in combination with other projects causing related impacts, as required by Section 15130 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Each of the three sections is organized into subsections, as follows:
 Introduction briefly describes the topics and issues covered in the section.  Scoping Process describes the comment letters received during the public review period of the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) that are related to the topic.  CEQA Baseline describes the existing conditions which formulate the baseline for the environmental review of the proposed project.
 Methodology describes the approach and methods employed to complete the environmental analysis for the issue under investigation.
 Existing Environmental Setting describes the physical conditions that exist at the present time that may influence or affect the issue under investigation. This section focuses on physical site characteristics that are relevant to the environmental topic being analyzed.  Regulatory Setting lists and discusses the laws, ordinances, regulations, and policies that relate to the specific environmental topic and how they apply to the proposed project.  Proposed Noise Element Goals, Strategies, and Policies lists the proposed goals, strategies, policies, and implementation measures from the Noise Element that are applicable to the analysis of each topical section of the Draft EIR.

DR A F T EN V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T RE P O R T

GE N E R A L P L A N NO I S E EL E M E N T

C I T Y O F L O N G BE A C H
MA R C H 2021
4 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.0 Existing Environmental Setting.docx (03/12/21) -2  Thresholds of Significance provides the thresholds that are the basis of the conclusions of significance, which are primarily the criteria in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines.  Project Impacts describes the potential environmental changes to the existing physical conditions that may occur if the proposed project is implemented. Evidence is presented to show the cause-and-effect relationship between the proposed project and potential changes in the environment. The exact magnitude, duration, extent, frequency, and range or other parameters of a potential impact are ascertained to the extent feasible to determine whether impacts may be significant. In accordance with CEQA, potential project impacts, if any, are classified as follows for each of the environmental topics discussed in this Draft EIR. ○ Significant Adverse Impact. Significant adverse impacts are those that cannot be fully mitigated or avoided. If the project is approved, decision makers are required to adopt a statement of overriding considerations pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 explaining why the project benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects caused by these significant adverse environmental impacts. ○ Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. This classification refers to significant environmental impacts that can be feasibly mitigated or avoided. If the project is approved, decision makers are required to make findings pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 that adverse significant impacts have been mitigated to the maximum extent feasible through implementation of mitigation measures. ○ Less than Significant Impact. Less than significant impacts are environmental impacts that have been identified but are not significant. No mitigation is required for less than significant impacts.
○ No Impact. A “no impact” determination is made when the proposed project is found to have no environmental impact.
 Mitigation Measures and Project Design Features
Mitigation Measures are project-specific measures that would be required for the project to avoid, minimize, rectify, reduce, eliminate, or compensate for a potentially significant adverse impact.

Project Design Features (PDFs) are specific components of the proposed project that have been incorporated to reduce potential environmental effects. PDFs are also described in Chapter 4.0 for reduction of environmental effects of the proposed project. PDFs are not included for every environmental topic.
 Level of Significance after Mitigation describes the significance of potential impacts after implementation of mitigation measures. Potential significant unavoidable impacts are clearly stated in this section.

C I T Y O F L O N G BE A C H
MA R C H 2021

DR A F T EN V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T RE P O R T

GE N E R A L P L A N NO I S E EL E M E N T
P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.0 Existing Environmental Setting.docx «03/12/21» 4-3  Cumulative Impacts refers to potential environmental changes to the existing physical conditions that may occur as a result of project implementation together with all other reasonably foreseeable, planned, and approved future projects producing related impacts.

Section 15355 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines cumulative impacts as “two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts.” Cumulative impacts may result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. For each of the environmental topics considered in this Draft EIR, the geographic scope of the cumulative analysis is defined. For example, the geographic scope of the cumulative analysis for potential cumulative land use and planning impacts includes all areas within the entire 50 square miles within the limits of the City of Long Beach (referred to the “planning area” throughout this Draft EIR).

DR A F T EN V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T RE P O R T

GE N E R A L P L A N NO I S E EL E M E N T

C I T Y O F L O N G BE A C H
MA R C H 2021
4 P:\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.0 Existing Environmental Setting.docx (03/12/21) -4 This page intentionally left blank

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» 4.1-1

4.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING
This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzes the direct land use impacts associated with the long-term implementation of the proposed General Plan Noise Element and amendments to the City of Long Beach (City) Noise Ordinance (Long Beach Municipal Code [LBMC] Section 8.80) (proposed project). The key focus of the analysis is the potential for the proposed Noise Element and amendments to the City’s Noise Ordinance to conflict with relevant policy and planning documents. The consistency analysis in this section was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), specifically State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(d).

Information presented in this section is based on information provided in the following documents:
the proposed General Plan Noise Element (December 2019) (Appendix B of this Draft EIR), the City of Long Beach’s (City) existing General Plan (as amended), the City’s Municipal Code, the Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) (1991), and the Orange County Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for the Joint Forces Training Base (JFTB) at Los Alamitos (1975).

4.1.1 Scoping Process
The City received a total of 53 public comment letters during the public review period of the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP). For copies of the IS/NOP comment letters, refer to Appendix A of this Draft EIR. Many of the comment letters received were related to a separate study that was concurrently being prepared regarding noise associated with special events taking place within the City and did not contain comments related to the scope and content of the Draft EIR. Four comment letters included comments related to land use and planning impacts related to the Draft EIR. Several letters suggested that acoustical neighborhoods1 should be considered instead of areas defined by land uses. Refer to page 4-29 in Section 4.1.8, Project Impacts, for discussion related to the use of Noise Districts rather than acoustical neighborhoods.

4.1.2 CEQA Baseline
During the preparation of the Initial Study (IS), the City was in the process of updating and adopting a new proposed Land Use Element (LUE) and Urban Design Element (UDE). Since the time the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was published (May 2019), the Long Beach City Council adopted the new Land Use Element (2019) and Urban Design Element (2019) at a public hearing on December 3, 2019. The new LUE, which replaced the previous 1989 LUE, introduced the concept of “PlaceTypes,” which replaced the previous land use approach of segregating property within the City through traditional land use designations and zoning classifications. The LUE establishes 14 primary PlaceTypes that aim to divide the City into distinct neighborhoods, thus allowing for greater flexibility and a mix of compatible land uses within these areas. The new UDE replaced the 1975 Scenic Routes Element.

The UDE defines the physical aspects of the urban environment. Specifically, the UDE aims to further enhance the City’s PlaceTypes established in the LUE by creating great places; improving the urban fabric, and public spaces; and defining edges, thoroughfares, and corridors.

1 An acoustical neighborhood is defined as an area in which sound is experienced by a group of people in that area. Specific land use and zoning designations would not necessarily be considered when designating an acoustical neighborhood. Designation of an acoustical neighborhood would be subjective by nature due to the differing experiences of users.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

4.1 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» -2 The new LUE and UDE have been incorporated into the land use consistency analysis of the Draft EIR for the purpose of evaluating land use impacts associated with project implementation. Therefore, the current General Plan LUE and UDE form the baseline for addressing project-related land use impacts.

4.1.3 Methodology
The impact analysis of this section considers the physical impacts of the proposed project related to land use compatibility and considers whether or not there are potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with applicable planning documents from the City and other agencies with relevant plans or policies. However, it should be noted that the proposed project is a policy/planning action and does not include or facilitate any physical improvements or development. Consistency of a project with an applicable plan is made by the Lead Agency when it acts on the project. The analysis in this Draft EIR discusses the findings of policy review and is meant to provide a guide for decision-makers during policy interpretation.

A project’s inconsistency with a policy is only considered significant if such inconsistency would cause significant physical environmental impacts. This Draft EIR section determines whether any project inconsistencies with public land use policies and documents would be significant and whether mitigation is feasible. Under this approach, a policy conflict is not in and of itself considered a significant environmental impact. An inconsistency between a proposed project and an applicable plan is a legal determination that may or may not indicate the likelihood of environmental impact. In some cases, an inconsistency may be evidence that an underlying physical impact is significant and adverse, while in other cases such an inconsistency may not result in significant physical impacts.

4.1.4 Existing Environmental Setting

4.1.4.1 Existing Planning Area
The General Plan addresses all land within the City’s jurisdictional limits and corresponding Sphere of Influence. Throughout this Draft EIR, these areas are referred to as the “planning area.” The planning area encompasses 50 square miles (approximately 33,000 acres) within the limits of the City of Long Beach (excluding the City of Signal Hill, which is completely surrounded by the City of Long Beach) in the southern region of Los Angeles County. The planning area is bordered on the west by the Cities of Carson and Los Angeles (including Wilmington and the Port of Los Angeles); on the north by the Cities of Compton, Paramount, and Bellflower; and on the east by the Cities of Lakewood, Hawaiian Gardens, Cypress, Los Alamitos, and Seal Beach. The planning area also includes the Port of Long Beach.

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» 4.1-3

4.1.4.2 Existing Land Uses
As illustrated by Table 4.1.1 and Figure 4.1-1 (all figures are included at the end of this section), existing land uses in the City include a mix of residential, commercial, open space, industrial, institutional, and transportation, communications, and utility uses. Figure 4.1-1, Existing Land Uses, shows the planning area of the City and existing land uses within the planning area. Table 4.1.1 and Figure 4.1-1 are based on data provided by SCAG’s 2016 Land Use Information for Los Angeles County dataset.
2 It should be noted that there are some limitations to these sets of data. Per the City’s General Plan LUE, the City maintains 2,750 acres of parks and open space. Further, the 3,520 acres of land that comprise the Port of Long Beach are categorized as “Transportation, Communications, and Utilities” and “Industrial” as shown in the table below. These land uses are described in further detail below.

Table 4.1.1: Existing Citywide Land Uses
Land Use Type Acreage Percentage of Total
Acreage
Agricultural 20.86 0.06%
Commercial and Services 1,377.54 4.18%
Education 744.48 2.26%
Facilities 666.44 2.02%
General Office 375.26 1.14%
Mixed Commercial and Industrial 0.77 0.01%
Mixed Residential 3.11 0.01%
Mixed Residential and Commercial 53.78 0.16%
Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks 141.24 0.43%
Single-Family Residential 7,940.42 24.10%
Multi-Family Residential 3,260.34 9.90%
Industrial 1,487.71 4.52%
Open Space and Recreation 1,869.58 5.67%
Under Construction 4.50 0.01%
Undevelopable 119.12 0.36%
Vacant 2,414.32 7.33%
Water 88.92 0.27%
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities 12,378.81 37.57% Total 32,947.20 100.00%
Source: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2016 Land Use Information for Los Angeles County. Website:
https://gisdata-scag.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/2016-land-use-information-for-los-angeles-county (accessed April 2, 2020).

4.1.4.3 Residential Uses
Residential uses are the predominant land use currently characterizing the City, comprising approximately 44 percent of the City’s total land area (approximately 11,399 acres) (refer to Table 4.1.2, below). Most of this land area is comprised of low-density single-family homes (approximately 24 percent; 7,940.42 acres).

2 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2016 Land Use Information for Los Angeles County. Website:
https://gisdata-scag.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/2016-land-use-information-for-los-angeles-county (accessed April 2, 2020).

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

4.1 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» -4 Table 4.1.2: Existing Citywide Residential Land Uses
Land Use Type Acreage Percentage of
Residential Acreage
Percent of Total
Acreage in City
Single-Family Residential 7,940.42 69.66% 24.10%
Mixed Residential 3.11 0.03% 9.90%
Mixed Residential and Commercial 53.78 0.47% 0.16%
Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks 141.24 1.24% 0.43%
Multi-Family Residential 3,260.34 28.60% 9.90%
Total Residential Acreage 11,398.89 100.00% 44.49%
Source: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2016 Land Use Information for Los Angeles County.

Website: https://gisdata-scag.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/2016-land-use-information-for-los-angeles-county (accessed April 2, 2020).

Note: Citywide acreage is 32,947.20.

Existing residential uses are distributed throughout the planning area and vary widely in type and density. For example, residential uses include detached single-family homes, mixed-style homes (i.e., duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes), and moderate- to high-density housing (i.e., apartments and condominiums). Higher density residential uses are located closer to the City’s Downtown area whereas lower density uses are located throughout the City and along its urban edge. The primary contributing factor for the wide range of housing densities and styles in the City is attributable to the time period during which the housing units were constructed. For example, single-family units on smaller lots with separate, detached garages were built from 1900 to 1930, whereas single-family homes built between 1930 and 1950 were developed at a mass-scale on larger lot sizes. However, from 1960 to 1980, housing units began to be developed within existing urban neighborhoods, thereby leading to higher-density housing developments. Large-scale housing development trends and the development of high-density housing units began in the 1980s and continue to the present day.

Commercial and Office Uses. Commercial/services and general office uses comprise approximately 4 percent and 1 percent of the total planning area, respectively (1,377.54 acres and 375.26 acres, respectively).

Commercial uses in the planning area consist primarily of commercial corridors, traditional retail strip commercial uses, pedestrian-oriented neighborhood retail areas, and auto-dominated shopping centers. The primary commercial core in the City is the Downtown area, which is located in the southernmost portion of the City in between the Los Angeles River and Alamitos Boulevard.

While the City’s Downtown serves as its primary commercial hub, there are several smaller commercial districts located throughout the City that serve surrounding residential neighborhoods.

In addition, several commercial corridors are present in the City; they connect the Downtown area with surrounding communities. Examples of these corridors include, but are not limited to, Long Beach Boulevard, Pacific Avenue, Atlantic Avenue, and Alamitos Avenue.

Office uses are found throughout the planning area, primarily near commercial corridors and centers. Larger office buildings are primarily located in the Downtown area, near the Long Beach Airport, and along Long Beach Boulevard and San Antonio Drive. Existing office buildings range in

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» 4.1-5 height from two to 30 stories and typically accommodate parking through the use of parking structures.

Industrial Uses. Industrial uses comprise approximately 5 percent of the planning area (1,487.71 acres). Heavy industrial uses in the City are primarily located near the Port of Long Beach, rail lines, and freeways. Older industrial uses are located adjacent to residential uses, whereas newer industrial uses are located adjacent to each other and are separated from residential and commercial uses. Industrial uses in the City include activities associated with the Port of Long Beach, trucking, packaging, assembly, light manufacturing, fabrication shops, food processing, auto and marine repair shops, and outdoor storage areas.

Institutional and Government Uses. Institutional and government uses include education and facilities uses, each of which comprise approximately 2 percent of the planning area (744.48 acres and 666.44 acres, respectively). These uses consist of civic uses, schools, colleges/universities, medical facilities, libraries, and community centers. Examples of institutional and governmental uses include the Long Beach Civic Center, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach City College, several private colleges and universities, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, the Veterans Administration Long Beach Medical Center, St. Mary Medical Center, Pacific Hospital of Long Beach, and Community Hospital. These uses are generally located in the southwestern, central, and southeastern portions of the City.

Open Space Uses. As identified by Table 4.1.1, open space and recreational uses in the City comprise approximately 6 percent of the City (1,869.58 acres) and range from small mini parks to large special use areas. The percentage of open space uses reported by SCAG underrepresents the total amount of park acreage in the City, as in reality, as described in the City’s LUE, the City maintains approximately 2,750 acres of parks and open space uses (approximately 8.34 percent of the total planning area). The most prominent open space areas in the City include El Dorado Regional Park, cemeteries, golf courses, marinas, bays, and wetlands. The majority open space uses are located along waterways and are scattered throughout residential neighborhoods.

Transportation, Communications, and Utilities. Transportation, communications, and utilities uses comprise approximately 38 percent of the total planning area in the City (12,379 acres). These areas are typically situated along utility corridors (e.g., transmission power lines), roadways, and freeways, and also include the Port of Long Beach and Long Beach Airport.

4.1.4.4 Neighborhoods and Community Plan Areas
While the City consists of many distinct land uses, there are nine primary community plan areas that combine to form the City’s unique identity (refer to Figure 4.1-2, Community Plan Areas). These community plan areas are listed and briefly described below.

1. North Long Beach. The North Long Beach area is located west of Interstate 710 (I-710) and includes the residential and industrial areas located west of Cherry Avenue and residential uses north of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). This area predominantly consists of residential and commercial uses; however, North Long Beach is also home to several public schools and a retail/business district.

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

4.1 \\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» -6

2. Bixby Knolls. The Bixby Knolls area consists of the California Heights, Los Cerritos, Bixby Knolls, Bixby Highlands, Scherer Park, Ridgewood Heights, and Ranton Circle neighborhoods.

This community is home to several historic resources as many of the residential units consist of custom homes built between the 1920s and 1940s. This area also includes a retail corridor along Atlantic Avenue between San Antonio Drive and the Interstate 405 (I-405) freeway.

3. Westside and Wrigley. The Westside and Wrigley community is located west of I-710 and includes the Westside and Arlington neighborhoods. The majority of the housing units in this area are single-family detached homes, also constructed between the 1920s and 1940s.

This community is also home to Cabrillo High School, the Villages at Cabrillo, and the Long Beach Jobs Center.

4. Eastside. The Eastside area is bound by the Cities of Los Alamitos and Hawaiian Gardens to the East, the City of Lakewood to the north, and the I-405 freeway to the south. This community is the largest of the nine community plan areas. Predominant uses in the Eastside area include low-density post-World War II housing, shopping centers, schools, religious institutions, and parks. This community plan area also contains an 800-acre open space area that features a community center and a 100-acre nature center, basketball and volleyball courts, a skate park, an archery range, picnic areas, a disc golf course, tennis courts, an 18-hole golf course, playgrounds, and a fishing lake and pond.

5. Central. The Central area includes both the Central Area West and Central Area East neighborhoods. The primary uses in this community plan area are residential and commercial. In addition to being one of several historic areas within the City, the Central area is also home to Cambodia Town, a 1-mile long business corridor along Anaheim Street.

6. Traffic Circle. The Traffic Circle area consists of a large multi-lane roundabout at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Lakewood Boulevard, as well as the Stearns Park, Alamitos Ridge, and Bryant School neighborhoods. Within this area, commercial and high-density residential uses are concentrated adjacent to the roundabout, with more traditional suburban residential neighborhoods located further north.

7. Downtown. The Downtown area is the primary commercial hub in the City. This area consists of the Washington School, Wilmore City, West End, East Village, Promenade, North Pine, and the Downtown Shoreline neighborhoods. As the economic center of the City, the Downtown is comprised of commercial, financial, institutional, entertainment, retail, maritime, and high-density/moderate density residential uses.

8. Midshore. The Midshore area is comprised of Alamitos Beach, Rose Park, Franklin School, Bluff Heights, and Bluff Park, most of which are considered historic residential districts.

While Midshore is home to several historic residential homes, new high-density residential units line Ocean Avenue within this community plan area.

9. Southeast. The Southeast area is comprised of Alamitos Heights, Belmont Heights, Belmont Shore, Belmont Park, Naples, Peninsula, Recreation Park, University Park Estates, and the

C ITY OF L ONG BEACH
MARCH 2021

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL I MPACT REPORT

GENERAL P LAN NOISE ELEMENT
\\vcorp12\projects\CLB1904.03 - Noise Element\CEQA\Draft EIR\4.1 Land Use and Planning.docx «03/10/21» 4.1-7 Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP) neighborhoods. This area is predominantly characterized by residential and commercial uses; however, the variety and type, and architectural styles of residential and commercial uses are unique to each neighborhood within this area.

4.1.5 Regulatory Setting

4.1.5.1 Federal Policies and Regulations
There are no federal land use policies or regulations that are applicable to the proposed project with respect to land use regulation.

4.1.5.2 State Policies and Regulations
California Government Code Section 65300. California planning law requires every city and county in California to adopt a “comprehensive, long-term general plan for physical development.” State law also requires the General Plan to identify goals and policies for the planning area as they relate to land use and development, provide a framework within which local decision-makers can make land use decisions, provide the public with an opportunity to participate in the decision-making process, and inform the community of the regulations guiding environmental protection and land use development decisions within the City.

State law also requires a General Plan to address seven mandatory topics, which include land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, and safety, but allows for flexibility in how these topics are addressed within the General Plan. While these seven elements are required, State law allows for local jurisdictions to adopt “optional” elements beyond those required by law.

However, once adopted, these “optional” elements have the same force and effect as policies related to those elements required by State law.

The current Long Beach General Plan includes elements that address each of the seven mandatory issue areas required by State law, but goes beyond these required elements by adopting the Historic Preservation Element (2010), the Air Quality Element (1996), the Seismic Safety Element (1988), and the Urban Design Element (2019).

4.1.5.3 Local and Regional Plans and Policies
The City is covered by several planning documents and programs that have varying degrees of regulation. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15125 (d), applicable regional, local, and conservation land use policies and guidelines from each of these planning documents are described below. The following paragraphs explain the regulations, plans, and policies applicable to the proposed project.

Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Plan. Consistent with requirements established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the County of Los Angeles adopted the Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) on December 19, 1991. The overall intent of this plan is to protect public health, safety, and welfare in the County of Los Angeles by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use patterns strategies that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards around public use airports. The Los Angeles ALUP establishes

Long Beach City CouncilJune 6, 2023

Long Beach City Council
June 6, 2023