Los Altos Hills City Council
March 17, 2022

Resolution -22 Page 3
Exhibit A
Outdoor Lighting Policy
Outdoor Lighting Policy
Approved by City Council – 9/30/97
Amended by City Council – 5/17/12
Amended by City Council –
Code Sections and Fast Track Guide for New Residences:

Article 10 of Title 10 Chapter 2 of the Site Development Ordinance outlines criteria for outdoor lighting. In particular, Section 10-2.1005 indicates that outdoor lighting should use “the minimum wattage lights which will safely illuminate the area” and that outdoor light sources “shall be shielded so as not to be directly visible from off-site.” Goal IV (C3) of the Fast-Track Guide for New Residences suggests that exterior lights be carefully placed to prevent light shining onto neighboring houses. The Zoning and Site Development Ordinances limit lighting within the property line setbacks to “driveway light fixtures, limited to one fixture on each side of a driveway, for a maximum of two (2) fixtures per lot,” but additional fixtures may be approved if necessary for safety.

Intent:

The purpose of Zoning and Site Development Ordinances and the Fast-Track Guide regarding outdoor lighting is to assure that the open and peaceful character of the Town is maintained, that adequate lighting is provided for the enjoyment of outdoor use areas, lighting does not intrude on the privacy of neighbors, light pollution is reduced, blue light emissions are minimized, and that glare is minimized onto adjacent properties. The intent of this policy is to clarify: (1) the types and numbers of lighting fixtures; and (2) the light emission and color temperatures of bulbs that are generally consistent with the ordinances and the Fast-Track Guide yet allow flexibility for additional lighting when it is necessary for safety purposes or where it is not visible from off the site.

Policy:

Definitions
Fully Shielded Fixture – No portion of the light bulb or light emanating diode is visible when viewed directly.

Glare - Lighting entering the eye directly from luminaries or indirectly from reflective surfaces that causes visual discomfort or reduced visibility.

Light Pollution - Any adverse effect of artificial light including, but not limited to, glare, light trespass, sky glow, energy waste, compromised safety and security, and impacts on the nocturnal environment.

Resolution -22 Page 4
Blue Light – Higher temperature light spectrum that is prevalent in lighting with color temperature higher than 3000 Kelvins. Lighting with lower color temperatures has less blue in its spectrum and is referred to as being “warm”
Transparent – The physical property of allowing light to pass through the material without appreciable scattering of light. When light passes through a transparent material, almost all of its light emission will pass through to the other side.

Translucent – A translucent material allows some but not all light to pass through. This partial transmittance of light makes translucent materials distinct from transparent materials. Examples of translucent materials include tinted glass, frosted glass, “half transparent” glass office walls, and several forms of painted glass.

Opaque – An opaque material transmits no light. All light is reflected, scattered, or absorbed by the material. No light passes through to the other side.

Opacity – The degree to which something blocks light. 100% Opacity material is opaque. 0% Opacity material is transparent. Partial opacity material is translucent.

General Outdoor Lighting

1. The light emission and color temperatures of light bulbs shall be limited as follows:

Maximum Light Emission
(Lumens, Φv)
Maximum Color Temperature
(Kelvin, K)
Path Lights 200 2700
Step Lights 110 2700
Exterior Wall Sconces 600 3000
Recessed Ceiling Lights 600 3000
Pendant Lights 600 3000
Gate Lights 600 3000

2. The number of lights on the exterior of a structure should be limited to providing for one light per doorway, with the exception of two lights at the main entrance, at double doors, at multi-door systems (e.g. bifold doors and stacking glass doors), a set of garage doors, etc.

Additional lights should only be placed in locations where the Planning Director or Planning Commission determines that they are necessary for safety.

3. Light fixtures should be fully shielded and directed downward, so that the light source is not visible from off site.

Resolution -22 Page 5

4. Pathway and driveway lighting should be fully shielded fixtures, directed downward and no taller than 18 inches. They should be spaced at the maximum distance that still provides for safe use. In order to avoid a “runway” appearance, it is recommended that lighting be placed on only one side of the driveway or walkway, or alternate from one side to the other.

Recessed louvered lights are suggested for walkways and steps.

5. Accumulation of many light sources in a small, concentrated areas (ex: BBQ pavilions, exterior dining areas, entry porches or rear patios) shall be avoided.

6. Recessed lights and downlights in second floor roof eaves are prohibited, except where located over a second floor balcony or deck. Such lights in first floor eaves shall be located over entryways, garage doors, and patio doorways only. Recessed lights and downlights in first or second floor roof eaves shall be positioned so that the light cone does not shine down into a neighboring property. No lighting shall be placed at or near the peak of the roof line of a one- or two-story gabled roof.

7. Garage doors may emit light from a maximum of 30% of their surface area. The light transmitting windows, panels, or other material shall be translucent, allowing no more than 30% of the interior light emission to pass through to the outside.

8. Spotlights and floodlights should be installed only for security and safety purposes. They shall be limited in number, installed with a timer or motion sensor, and directed away from clear view of neighbors. Shielding with shrouds or louvers is recommended.

9. High intensity discharge lighting, such as mercury vapor, high and low pressure sodium, and metal halide lighting, is prohibited. The maximum color temperature of all lights must be 3000 Kelvins or below.

10. Any light beams shall not exit the property.

11. Up-lighting of any kind is prohibited.

12. Wall wash lighting of exterior walls is prohibited.

13. Visible LED lighting strips, tape lights, and bistro lights are prohibited.

Tree Lights

1. Downlighting from trees is allowed under the following conditions:
● Lights are provided for safety or for outdoor use areas ● Lights must be minimal in number, with a maximum of two per tree

Resolution -22 Page 6
● The light sources must not be visible from off site
● The light fixtures are shielded and directed downward ● The tree must be evergreen

2. Bistro lights, pendant lights, and any similar lighting fixtures hung down from or hung amongst trees are prohibited.

Lighting within Setbacks

1. Lighting within the property line setbacks is limited to two fixtures only, except where the Planning Director or Planning Commission determines that they are necessary for safety.

2. All lights within property line setbacks shall be fully shielded. This includes gate lights within the setbacks.

Lighting for Recreation Areas

1. Lighting is not permitted for tennis courts, basketball courts, bocce ball, or other recreation/sports courts.

2. Pool lighting is allowed under the following conditions:
● Lights are placed beneath the surface of the water in the pool or spa to illuminate the water
● Underwater lights are placed such that the light shines away from neighboring properties ● A maximum of four lights are allowed for pools and spas combined ● Other exterior lights used to illuminate the surrounding area use the minimum number and wattage of lighting which will safely illuminate the area ● No direct light is cast beyond the immediate area of the pool Special Event Lighting

1. Special event lighting, seasonal or otherwise (ex: Christmas lights), shall be limited to 60 days.

2. Light fixtures for single night parties and events shall adhere to all the conditions listed in this document. Search lights, Up-lights, LED Dance lights, and other lights that exceed light emission and color temperature limits or have light beams exiting the property are not permitted.

Lighting within Open Space Easements

1. Lighting is not permitted within Open Space Easements

Resolution -22 Page 7
Exceptions
The Planning Director and/or Planning Commission may grant exceptions to allow lighting different from that outlined above when the proposed outdoor lighting is determined to be necessary to safely illuminate the area, or where the size of the property and/or extensive screening will assure that the light source is not visible from off site.

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Phone: (650) 941-7222
www.losaltoshills.ca.gov
Outdoor Lighting Policy
Approved by City Council –9/30/97
Amended by City Council –5/17/12
Code Sections and Fast Track Guide for New Residences:

Article of Title 10 Chapter 2 of the Site Development Ordinance outlines criteria for outdoor lighting. In particular, Section 10-2.1005 indicates that outdoor lighting should use “the minimum wattage lights which will safely illuminate the area” and that outdoor light sources “shall be shielded so as not to be directly visible from off-site.” Goal IV (C3) of the Fast Track Guide for New Residences suggests that exterior lights be carefully placed to prevent light shining onto neighboring houses. The Zoning and Site Development Ordinances limit lighting within the property line setbacks to “driveway light fixtures, limited to one fixture on each side of a driveway, for a maximum of two (2) fixtures per lot,” but additional fixtures may be approved if necessary for safety.

Intent:

The purpose of Zoning and Site Development Ordinances and the Fast Track Guide regarding outdoor lighting is to assure that the open and peaceful character of the Town is maintained, that adequate lighting is provided for the enjoyment of outdoor use areas, lighting does not intrude on the privacy of neighbors, light pollution is reduced, and the glare is minimized onto adjacent properties. The intent of this policy is to clarify the types and numbers of lighting fixtures that are generally consistent with the ordinances and the Fast Track Guide, yet to allow flexibility for additional lighting when it is necessary for safety purposes or where it is not visible from off the site.

Policy:

1. The number of lights on the exterior of a structure should be limited to providing for one light per doorway, with the exception of two lights at the main entrance, at double doors or garage doors, etc., and additional lights only where the Planning Director or Planning Commission determines they are needed for safety.

2. Pathway and driveway lighting should be restricted to low-height fixtures and should be spaced the maximum distance apart which will still provide for safe use. In order to avoid a “runway” appearance, it is recommended that lighting be placed on only one side of the driveway or walkway, or alternate from one side to the other. Recessed louvered lights are suggested for walkways and steps.

Attachment 2

3. Light fixtures should be shielded or downlights, so that the light source is not visible from off site. Exceptions may be permitted in limited locations (entry, garage, etc.) or where the fixtures would not be visible from off site.

4. Downlighting from trees is acceptable if provided for safety or for outdoor use areas, where minimal in number, and where the light source is not visible from off site.

5. Uplighting of trees is not allowed, unless it is clearly demonstrated that the number of such lights are minimal and the glow of the uplighting would not be visible from off site.

6. Spotlights should be limited in number, and directed away from clear view of neighbors.

Shielding of spotlights with shrouds or louvers is suggested.

7. High intensity discharge lighting, such as mercury vapor, high and low pressure sodium, and metal halide lighting, is prohibited.

8. Lighting within the property line setbacks is limited to two driveway light fixtures only, for the purpose of locating and identifying the site. No lights are allowed in side or rear yard setback areas, except where determined to be necessary for safety.

9. The Planning Commission and/or staff may allow lighting different from that outlined above when the proposed outdoor lighting is determined to be necessary to safely illuminate the area, or where the size of the property and/or extensive screening will assure that the light source is not visible from off site.

10. Artificial lighting is not permitted for tennis courts or other recreation/sports courts.

11. Pool lighting is allowed under the following conditions:
• Lights are placed beneath the surface of the water in the pool or spa to illuminate the water
• Other exterior lights used to illuminate the surrounding area use the minimum number and wattage of lighting which will safely illuminate the area • No direct light is cast beyond the immediate area of the pool Definitions
’ Glare - Lighting entering the eye directly from luminaries or indirectly from reflective surfaces that causes visual discomfort or reduced visibility.
’ Light Pollution - Any adverse effect of artificial light including, but not limited to, glare, light trespass, sky glow, energy waste, compromised safety and security, and impacts on the nocturnal environment.

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS July 1, 2021
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF REVISED OUTDOOR LIGHTING POLICY AND GUIDELINES; SP19-0007
FROM: Jeremy Loh, Associate Planner
APPROVED: Steve Padovan, Planning and Building Director RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:

Review and discuss the revised Outdoor Lighting Policy for Site Development permits as proposed by the Environmental Design and Protection Committee (EDPC).

BACKGROUND
Outdoor lighting is a commonly referenced visual impact for development projects at public hearings. The Town of Los Altos Hills Municipal Code Section 10-2.1001 states that the purpose of outdoor lighting is as follows:
1) To assure that outdoor lighting on the exterior of structures and along walkways, driveways, and landscape features, maintains the openness and quiet atmosphere of the Town and minimizes excessive use of energy;
2) To provide lighting for safety and adequate lighting for the enjoyment of outdoor use areas, such as patios and pools; and
3) To prevent lighting which is intrusive and imposes on the privacy and quiet enjoyment of neighboring properties.

The EDPC assists the Planning Department in assessing impacts caused by proposed development on neighboring properties. Among the various impacts, outdoor lighting is present on nearly every Site Development Permit and the number of light fixtures is often reduced or limited by the Planning Director at a Site Development meeting in response to a recommendation by the EDPC.

The Town’s existing Outdoor Lighting Policy was approved by the City Council on September 30, 1997, and subsequently amended on May 17, 2012 (see Attachment 1). However, recent trends in lighting and the intensity of LED lighting has caused the EDPC and the Planning Department to consider an update to the Outdoor Lighting Policy, as the provisions of the existing Outdoor Lighting Policy and Ordinance (Section 10-2.10) do not set limits on the intensity of emitted light.

At the March 9, 2021 regular meeting of the EDPC, the committee voted unanimously to send their draft Outdoor Lighting Policy to the Planning Department for review and eventual introduction to the Planning Commission. Staff received the draft document on April 8, 2021.

Attachment 3

Planning Commission Page 2
Revised Outdoor Lighting Policy
July 1, 2021

DISCUSSION
Due to technological advances and cost reductions made to LED lighting, staff had determined that an update to the Town’s Outdoor Lighting Policy was necessary. A policy update was preferred over revising the Town’s code as the latter can be much more difficult to amend should the need arise and a policy is the best tool for detailed specifications that can change as technology improves. Staff has reviewed the recommended changes and generally supports the updates to the Outdoor Lighting Policy and guidelines as proposed.

The EDPC recommendations expand on the existing lighting policy and organizes the guidelines into the following areas:

1. General outdoor lighting

2. Tree lights

3. Lighting within setbacks

4. Lighting for recreation areas

5. Special event lighting
The draft policy includes maximum light emission (measured in Lumens) and maximum color temperature (measured in Kelvins) for various light fixture types and also includes definitions to provide clarification of the recommended guidelines.

NEXT STEPS
The goal of this meeting is to provide the Planning Commission with an overview of the EDPC’s proposed Outdoor Lighting Policy and obtain feedback and direction on any recommended language changes that should be included or amended prior to holding a public meeting to discuss an amended Outdoor Lighting Policy. Following the receipt of the Planning Commission’s comments, staff will then incorporate the changes into an updated document that will be included as a public hearing item at the next available Planning Commission meeting.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Town of Los Altos Hills Outdoor Lighting Policy

2. EDPC Draft Outdoor Lighting Policy

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS October 7, 2021
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON REVISED OUTDOOR LIGHTING POLICY AND GUIDELINES; SP19-0007
FROM: Jeremy Loh, Associate Planner
APPROVED: Steve Padovan, Planning and Building Director RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:

Review and discuss the revised Outdoor Lighting Policy for Site Development permits as proposed by the Environmental Design and Protection Committee (EDPC) and as modified by staff.

BACKGROUND
At the July 1, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, staff introduced a proposal to revise the Town’s Outdoor Lighting Policy, included as Attachment 2. The staff report prepared for the introductory meeting is included as Attachment 1. As presented, staff’s recommendation was for a policy update rather than a zoning ordinance update. The Planning Commission received the report and presentation showing the Environmental Design and Protection Committee’s (EDPC) proposed revisions which are included as Attachment 3; a key facet of which was to include guidelines for maximum emitted light and color temperature for various fixture types. The next steps identified by staff and the Commission were to review lighting ordinances and policies of neighboring and similar jurisdictions for guidelines that could be incorporated into the Town’s efforts.

DISCUSSION
Staff reviewed the lighting policies and ordinances of 11 jurisdictions for potential modifications to proposed revisions. A matrix summarizing the policies reviewed is included as Attachment 4.

A majority of the policies that were reviewed restrict emitted light and color temperature and require fully shielded, down-directed or recessed lights. Where several of the policies differ is whether to use lumens or foot-candles as a measure of emitted light. Additionally, several policies do not limit the amount of light proposed on a property provided that little to no light shines beyond the property line. Most policies also require automated controls such as timers and motion sensors for outdoor lighting. Finally, a majority of policies include a list of prohibited lighting.

Regarding foot-candles versus lumens, a majority of light fixture and bulb manufacturers include emitted lumens in their specifications or cut sheets while foot-candles depend on the height of the mounting in relation to the surface being lit. Several manufacturers include photometrics in their specifications or cut sheets which estimates foot-candles based on a typical installation.

Any update to the Town’s policy would necessitate an updated handout. The Town’s current handout is a simple recitation of the purpose and intent of the policy followed by guidelines. Staff Attachment 4

Planning Commission Page 2
Update on Revised Outdoor Lighting Policy
October 7, 2021
found a lighting policy brochure for the City of Malibu which could serve as an example to follow.

The City of Malibu’s Dark Sky Ordinance handout is included as Attachment 5.

Separate from the research of other policies and the recommendations of the EDPC, is the discussion of light diffusing elements in fully shielded fixtures. While this was not discussed at the previous Planning Commission meeting, it is worth discussing as part of the definition of “dark skies.” Some fixtures include a white plastic, frosted glass, or seeded glass element beneath the shielded bulb which diffuses or splits the light. Historically the Town has allowed these elements provided that the bulb itself is not visible behind the glass.

NEXT STEPS
The goal of this meeting is to provide further information for the Planning Commission to consider incorporating into an updated Outdoor Lighting Policy that roughly follows the recommendation of the EDPC. The purpose is to ultimately obtain the feedback and direction on any recommended language changes that should be included or amended prior to holding a public meeting to discuss an amended Outdoor Lighting Policy. Following the receipt of the Planning Commission’s comments, staff will then incorporate the changes into an updated document that will be included as a public hearing item at the next available Planning Commission meeting.

ATTACHMENTS

1. July 1, 2021 Planning Commission staff report

2. Existing Town of Los Altos Hills Outdoor Lighting Policy

3. Current Draft Outdoor Lighting Policy

4. Outdoor Lighting Regulations Matrix for Surrounding Communities

5. City of Malibu Dark Sky Ordinance handout

Approved November 4, 2021
1 Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 7, 2021 Minutes Town of Los Altos Hills
Planning Commission Regular Meeting
October 7, 2021 Minutes
Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Via teleconference according to the Government Code Section 54953(e), Chair Indaco called the October 7, 2021 Planning Commission Regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

Present: Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Patel, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco,
Staff: Interim Planning Director Padovan, Associate Planner Loh, Management Analyst Einfalt, Planning Technician Brunner, Claire Lai, Assistant City Attorney

2. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
Persons wishing to address the Commission on any subject not on the agenda are invited to do so now.

Please note, however, that the Commission is not able to undertake extended discussion or act tonight on non-agendized items. Such items will be referred to staff or placed on the agenda for a future meeting.

Chair Indaco opened PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR.

Kit Gordon announced the death of Art Lachenbruch, read his obituary, and requested the Town consider a dedication of some type in his honor.

No other presentations from the floor.

Chair Indaco closed PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

3.1 Approval of September 2, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes Chair Indaco requested to strike out "and support of" at the top of page 3.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Commissioner Patel moved that the September 2, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes be approved as discussed. The motion was seconded by Vice-Chair Waschura.

MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYES:

Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Patel, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning Commission Ex Parte
Commissioner Patel had no ex parte communications.

Vice-Chair Waschura had communications with Commissioner Couperus, Michael Grady, and email correspondence with Kit Gordon on Item 4.1
Commissioner Smith had communications with Kit Gordon and Sue Welch on Item 4.1.

Attachment 5

Approved November 4, 2021
2 Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 7, 2021 Minutes Commissioner Couperus had communications with Sue Welch and Chair Indaco on Item 4.1; and Vice-Chair Waschura on Item 5.1.

Chair Indaco had communications with Carol Gottlieb of the Environmental Design & Protection Committee (EDPC), Kit Gordon, and Sue Welch on Item 4.1; and with Commissioner Couperus on Item 5.1

4.1 28001 Elena Road (APN 182-02-0196) – File # ZP21-0047 – Lands of Sea Landing LP Zoning Permit for new 6’-0” tall property line fencing and gates. Continued from August 5, 2021 Planning Commission meeting.

CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303(e) Project Planner: Staff: Jeremy Loh
Chair Indaco opened the PUBLIC HEARING.

Associate Planner Loh presented the staff report.

Vice-Chair Waschura asked staff clarifying questions during the presentation.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and staff ensued at the conclusion of the staff presentation.

The applicant's representative, Stephen Pahl, offered comments to the Commissioners.

Commissioner Patel addressed the applicant regarding the lack of prepared information requested by the Commission at the conclusion of the August hearing for this hearing.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and the applicant ensued.

Public Comment
Michael Grady, a Los Altos Hills resident, expressed his concerns regarding the proposed fence to the wildlife and staff’s response to the unpermitted work.

Kit Gordon, Open Space Committee Chair, offered comments in support of wildlife’s continuing access to the property.

Charles Bronitsky, an attorney for the owners of Parcel 1, offered comments regarding his clients’ concerns about the proposed fence.

Alisa Bredo, a Pathways Committee member, offered comments against allowing the gate and for supporting a pathway and a wildlife-friendly fence.

Sue Welch, a Los Altos Hills resident, offered comments in support of maintaining a wildlife corridor and against the proposed fence.

Stephen Pahl, the applicant offered to answer questions from the public, but none were asked.

Vice-Chair Waschura asked the Assistant City Attorney, Claire Lai, for guidance regarding the Planning Commission’s limitations regarding various conditions of approval for a fence permit.

Commissioner Patel asked staff questions regarding agricultural habitats.

Chair Indaco offered comments against the applicant’s intent to plant bamboo.

Chair Indaco closed the PUBLIC HEARING.

Approved November 4, 2021
3 Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 7, 2021 Minutes Commission Discussion
Commissioner Couperus offered comments regarding the applicant’s adversarial position with the Planning Commission versus a collaborative one. He offered additional comments regarding the details of the Williamson Act, the proposed fence and itsimpact on wildlife, and shared slides illustrating wildlife trails on the property.

Commissioner Smith agreed with Commissioner Couperus' comments.

Commissioner Patel agreed with Commissioner Couperus' comments and noted the applicant's incomplete application at this second hearing. He suggested continuing this item, contingent upon three factors: 1. all unpermitted fences be removed immediately, 2. return to the Planning Commission only if there is a detailed and accurate proposal for the fencing locations; and 3. have the Live Oak Associates evaluate the wildlife corridor for this property and present their findings at the same hearing for this matter.

Vice-Chair Waschura offered comments regarding possible conditions of approval and requested the applicant reevaluate their application.

Chair Indaco agreed with Commissioner Couperus' presentation, Commissioner Patel’s and Vice-Chair Waschura's comments, and offered additional comments.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Chair Indaco motioned that the Planning Commission CONTINUE to a date uncertain with these instructions to the applicant:

1. remove all the unpermitted fences immediately,

2. prepare and submit a detailed fence proposal, referencing Associate Planner Loh's letter from the August 2021 Planning Commission meeting,

3. have the Open Space Committee walk the area to evaluate the wildlife concerns, and

4. ensure anything proposed by the applicant has been agreed upon by the owners of Parcel 1 and Lot 1.

The motion was seconded by Commissioner Patel.

MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYES:

Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Patel, Commissioner Smith, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

4.2. 12255 Menalto Drive – File # APL21-0003 – Lands of St. Ledger Appeal of the Site Development Committee’s approval of Site Development Permit (SD21-0009) for landscape screening and fencing for an approved new residence.

CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303 (a) Project Planner: Jeremy Loh
Item 4.2 was continued to the November 4, 2021 Planning Commission meeting at the request of the appellant.

5. NEW BUSINESS

5.1 Appointment of a two-member subcommittee to review requirements for new construction and explore options with the County Fire Department.

Director Padovan provided a brief description of the nature of the request by the City Council.

Approved November 4, 2021
4 Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 7, 2021 Minutes Commissioner Couperus provided the history and update on this topic.

Commission discussion ensued regarding appointing Commissioner Couperus and Vice-Chair Waschura to this committee.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Motion by Chair Indaco to appoint Commissioner Couperus and Vice-Chair Waschura to a subcommittee to review requirements for new construction and explore options with the County Fire Department.

The motion was seconded by Commissioner Patel.

MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYES: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Patel, Commissioner Smith, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

5.2 Update on the Revised Outdoor Lighting Policy and Guidelines.

Associate Planner Loh presented the update on the Revised Outdoor Lighting Policy and Guidelines.

Vice-Chair Waschura asked staff questions.

Chair Indaco offered comments regarding some of the items in the EDPC's proposal.

Commission discussion ensued.

Interim Planning Director Padovan offered comments regarding LED strip lighting.

Commissioner Patel offered suggestions to modify some of the lighting verbiage.

Commissioners Couperus and Patel questioned the issue of compliance with a new lighting policy.

Staff will revise proposal
NO MOTION.

6. REPORTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
There was an announcement by the History Committee to visit the Moffet Museum. Contact Carol Gottlieb for more information.

6.1 Past Meeting
• September 16, 2021 – Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Smith provided highlights of the past City Council meeting.

6.2 Upcoming Meeting Assignments
• October 21, 2021 – Commissioner Patel
• November 18, 2021 – Commissioner Couperus
• December 16, 2021 – Vice-Chair Waschura
Chair Indaco confirmed upcoming meeting assignments.

Approved November 4, 2021
5 Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 7, 2021 Minutes

7. REPORTS FROM PAST SITE DEVELOPMENT / FAST TRACK MEETINGS

7.1 September 7, 2021
• 12500 Minorca Court – File #SD21-0032 – Lands of St. Arora Site Development Permit for a new 4,551 square-foot, one-story residence with a 2,157 square-foot basement, and a detached 1,198 square-foot accessory dwelling unit. APPROVED

7.2 September 14, 2021
• 12170 Dawn Lane – File #SD21-0044 – Lands of Koganti
Site Development Permit for landscape screening for an approved new residence. Continued from August 17, 2021 Site Development Committee meeting. APPROVED

7.3 September 21, 2021
• 12360 Priscilla Lane – File #SD21-0074 – Lands of Chawla Site Development Permit for landscape screening for an approved new residence; modifications to approved driveway and hardscape. APPROVED

7.4 September 28, 2021
• 14330 Debell Road – File #ZP21-0071 – Lands of Lexterra LLC Site Development Permit to allow placement of a temporary trailer for habitation during construction of an approved new residence for a period of six months. APPROVED
• 27860 Black Mountain Road – File #SD21-0034 – Lands of Broken Oak Trust Site Development Permit for landscape screening for an approved new residence and accessory structures. Continued from August 31, Site Development Committee meeting. APPROVED

7.5 October 5, 2021
• 13691 Old Altos Road – File #SD21-0064 – Lands of Neal Site Development Permit for a 381 square-foot, second-story addition to an existing single-family residence.

Planning Director Padovan provided a summary on past Site Development / Fast Track hearings and noted that 13691 Old Altos Road was CONTINUED to the October 19, 2021 Site Development Committee meeting.

8. PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT.

Interim Planning Director Padovan shared general ideas on how the Town will address Senate Bill 9.

Commissioner Patel asked staff questions regarding splitting lots.

Chair Indaco suggested the Commissioners listen to the previous City Council meeting to gain clarification on this topic from comments made by the Town’s attorney.

Commissioner Patel asked for an update on the hiring plans for the Planning Department.

Approved November 4, 2021
6 Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 7, 2021 Minutes

9. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 9:59 PM by Chair Indaco.

Respectfully submitted,
Keren Brunner
Planning Technician

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS February 3, 2022
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
SUBJECT: UPDATED OUTDOOR LIGHTING POLICY AND GUIDELINES; SP19-0007 FROM: Jeremy Loh, Associate Planner
APPROVED: Sofia Mangalam, Planning Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission:

Forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed amendments to the Town’s Outdoor Lighting Policy (Attachment 1) for Site Development permits as proposed by the Environmental Design and Protection Committee (EDPC) and as modified by staff.

BACKGROUND
Outdoor lighting is a commonly referenced visual impact for development projects at public hearings. The Town of Los Altos Hills Municipal Code Section 10-2.1001 states that the purpose of outdoor lighting is as follows:
1) To assure that outdoor lighting on the exterior of structures and along walkways, driveways, and landscape features, maintains the openness and quiet atmosphere of the Town and minimizes excessive use of energy;
2) To provide lighting for safety and adequate lighting for the enjoyment of outdoor use areas, such as patios and pools; and
3) To prevent lighting which is intrusive and imposes on the privacy and quiet enjoyment of neighboring properties.

The EDPC assists the Planning Department in assessing impacts caused by proposed development on neighboring properties. Among the various impacts, outdoor lighting is present on nearly every Site Development Permit and the number of light fixtures is often reduced or limited by the Planning Director at a Site Development meeting in response to a recommendation by the EDPC.

The Town’s existing Outdoor Lighting Policy was approved by the City Council on September 30, 1997, and subsequently amended on May 17, 2012 (see Attachment 2). However, recent trends in lighting and the intensity of LED bulbs raised concerns with the EDPC and Planning staff. As a result, EDPC agreed to prepare amendments to the Outdoor Lighting Policy, as the provisions of the existing policy and the municipal code (Sections 10-2.1001 through 10-2.1005) do not set limits on the intensity of emitted light.

At the March 9, 2021 regular meeting of the EDPC, the committee voted unanimously to send their draft Outdoor Lighting Policy to the Planning Department for review and eventual introduction to the Planning Commission (see Attachment 3). Staff received the draft document on April 8, 2021.

Attachment 6

Planning Commission Page 2
Outdoor Lighting Policy Update
February 3, 2022
At the July 1, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, staff introduced the proposed amendments to the Town’s Outdoor Lighting Policy (see Attachment 4). A key facet of the proposed policy is to include guidelines for maximum emitted light and color temperature for various fixture types (wall lights, sconces, path lights, etc.).

The staff report prepared for the introductory meeting included detailed background information and is included as Attachment 5. As presented, staff’s recommendation was for a policy update rather than a zoning ordinance update based on the rapidly changing nature of lighting technology and the desire to have flexibility to approve alternative lighting designs without the need to approve a variance.

Following a thorough discussion of the proposed changes, the Commission directed staff to review lighting ordinances and policies of similar jurisdictions for guidelines that could be incorporated into the draft policy.

Staff returned with a progress report to the Planning Commission on October 7, 2021 and presented a matrix of policies and ordinances from 11 similar jurisdictions (see Attachment 6) and a handout explaining the City of Malibu’s Dark Sky Ordinance (Attachment 7). It was determined that despite some minor difference in measurement (lumens vs foot-candles) as well as minor differences in wording, the majority of the outdoor lighting regulations seek to limit emitted light, which is consistent with the EDPC’s recommendations. The staff report prepared for the October 7, 2021 Planning Commission meeting is included as Attachment 8.

NOTICING/PUBLIC OUTREACH
The public was advised of this Public Hearing in the following ways:
• Newspaper notice – January 21, 2022
• Public Posting Places – January 21, 2022
• Town Website: www.losaltoshills.ca.gov – January 28, 2022 To date, staff has received no public comments on the proposed amendments.

DISCUSSION
Staff finalized a draft of an updated Outdoor Lighting Policy which generally follows the recommendations set by EDPC with minor changes to wording and formatting. Staff’s recommendations expand on the existing lighting policy and organize the guidelines into the following areas in order to serve the current purpose and intent of the existing outdoor lighting regulations in the municipal code:

1. General outdoor lighting (added maximum light emissions, added guidelines on placement, and added regulations for garage doors)

2. Tree lights (added regulations on lights hung from trees)

3. Lighting within setbacks (expanded language for light fixtures allowed in setbacks)

4. Lighting for recreation areas (expanded language for light fixtures in swimming pools)

5. Special event lighting (added regulations on seasonal lighting and event lighting)

Planning Commission Page 3
Outdoor Lighting Policy Update
February 3, 2022
The draft policy includes maximum light emission (measured in Lumens) and maximum color temperature (measured in Kelvins) for various light fixture types and also provides clarifications and new guidelines. Additionally, new definitions are included to clarify proposed guidelines. As the Outdoor Lighting Policy is not a part of the Municipal Code, applicants may request exceptions to the policy without the need to apply for a variance.

The EDPC reviewed the draft Policy and provided additional recommendations and clarifications they have prepared since providing their original proposal. In addition to clarifications, the EDPC recommends maximum number of fixtures in pools and in trees, prohibiting light fixtures in Open Space Easements, and stating that the Outdoor Lighting Policy will apply to construction sites.

The EDPC’s comments are included as Attachment 9.

CONCLUSION
The Town’s Outdoor Lighting Policy is due for an update based on changes to lighting technology and trends in site development proposals. The Town’s lighting ordinance limits the number of light fixtures allowed in setbacks but is otherwise not restrictive to protect residents’ rights to light their outdoor areas. That being said, expanded guidelines will help maintain the Town’s rural character at nighttime and reduce the impacts of new development. The proposed Outdoor Lighting Policy Update generally follows the guidelines already used by EDPC and the Planning Department.

Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the updated Outdoor Lighting Policy.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft Outdoor Lighting Policy

2. Existing Town of Los Altos Hills Outdoor Lighting Policy

3. EDPC Recommended Outdoor Lighting Policy Amendments

4. Planning Staff Draft Outdoor Lighting Policy Amendments

5. July 1, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report

6. Matrix of Similar Jurisdiction’s Outdoor Lighting Policies and Codes

7. City of Malibu’s Dark Sky Ordinance

8. October 7, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report

9. EDPC comments on Draft Outdoor Lighting Policy

Approved February 3, 2022
Town of Los Altos Hills
Planning Commission Special Meeting
January 13, 2022 Minutes
Zoom Meeting and Town Hall, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

1. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Via teleconference according to the Government Code Section 54953(e), Chair Indaco called the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Special meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

Present: Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Smith, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco

Absent: Commissioner Patel
Staff: Planning Director Mangalam, Principal Planner Padovan, Associate Planner Loh, Assistant Planner Perez, Management Analyst Einfalt, Planning Technician Brunner

2. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
Chair Indaco opened PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR.

No presentations from the floor.

Chair Indaco closed PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR

3.1 Motion of the Planning Commission of the Town of Los Altos Hills to continue meeting virtually through teleconference meetings and making related findings pursuant to AB 361.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Chair Indaco moved to approve the Planning Commission of the Town of Los Altos Hills continue meeting virtually through teleconference meetings and making related findings pursuant to AB 361.

The motion had no second.

MOTION PASSED: 4-0-0-0-1
AYES:

Commissioner Couperus, Commissioner Smith, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Patel

3.2 Approval of December 9, 2021 Special Meeting Minutes Chair Indaco noted a correction to the last item in the motion for 4.1. It should read, "...request staff to examine the possibility of removal of the existing conservation easement." MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice-Chair Waschura moved that the December 9, 2021 Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes be approved with noted corrections.

The motion was seconded by Chair Indaco.

MOTION PASSED: 3-0-1-0-1
AYES: Commissioner Couperus, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Smith
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Patel
Attachment 7

2 Planning Commission Special Meeting January 13, 2022 Minutes

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning Commission Ex Parte
Commissioner Couperus had communication with Chair Indaco, on Item 4.3.

Vice-Chair Waschura had communications with Chair Indaco on Item 4.2, and with Commissioner Smith on Item 4.3.

Chair Indaco communications with Carol Gottlieb of the Environmental Design & Protection Committee (EDPC) on Item 4.1, Vice-Chair Waschura on Item 4.2, Commissioner Couperus and neighbors to the applicant Michael Grady and Tim Schreiner on Item 4.3.

Commissioner Smith had communication with Vice-Chair Waschura on Item 4.3.

4.1 26685 Purissima Rd – File #VAR21-0006 – Lands of Stemm/Hsia Request for a Variance to allow approximately 9 sq. ft. of an existing unpermitted accessory structure that is encroaching 33 inches in the 30-foot rear yard setback.

CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303(e) Project Planner: Areli Perez
Chair Indaco opened the PUBLIC HEARING.

Assistant Planner Perez presented the staff report.

The applicant, Mark Stemm, introduced himself and answered questions from the Commissioners.

Vice-Chair Waschura requested that the shed’s existing encroachment not be grandfathered in if it were to be demolished and that any new structure would be presented as a new development and built outside the Town’s required setbacks.

Public Comment
No public comment.

Chair Indaco closed the PUBLIC HEARING.

Commissioner Discussion
No Commission discussion.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice-Chair Waschura motioned to adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) to APPROVE the Variance Permit, subject to the listed findings and conditions of approval, with the added condition that if the current structure is demolished, any new development would respect the standard setbacks.

The motion was seconded by Commissioner Couperus.

MOTION PASSED: 4-0-0-0-1
AYES:

Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Couperus, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Patel

4.2 27388 Sherlock Court – File #SD19-0003 – Lands of Chung Site Development Permit for a new 4,958 square-foot, two-story residence on a vacant parcel along with a request for a grading exception for parking and a firetruck turnaround

3 Planning Commission Special Meeting January 13, 2022 Minutes and private road improvements to create a more conforming emergency access roadway with a minimum width of 18 feet.

CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Sections 15301(c) 15303(a) Project Planner: Steve Padovan
Continued from the August 5, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting Chair Indaco opened the PUBLIC HEARING.

Principal Planner Padovan presented the staff report.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and staff ensued.

Project Designer John Johnson spoke on behalf of the applicant, highlighting key design changes made at the recommendation of a previous planning commission meeting.

Gary Kleyner, the civil engineer for the project, was available to answer questions but did not speak at this time.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and Mr. Johnson ensued.

Public Comment
Kit Gordon, representing the Open Space Committee (OSC), asked about adding an open space easement on a section of the property and offered advice on recommendations for native plants.

Don and Kelyn Dewar, Los Altos Hills residents on Moody Rd., offered comments on the road, easements, and oak trees.

Vijay Chawla, representing the EDPC, offered comments and shared a presentation.

Tom Goff, a Los Altos Hills resident, offered comments regarding Condition #21, requested nine-foot-wide access be added, and asked if solar panels were planned for the roof.

Gary Kleyner, the civil engineer for the project, responded to questions regarding the proposed road improvements and fire truck turnaround.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and Mr. Kleyner ensued.

Chair Indaco asked staff about the placement of solar panels.

Principal Planner Padovan provided a response to that question and other questions asked during the public comment section.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and Mr. Johnson ensued.

Chair Indaco closed the PUBLIC HEARING.

Commissioner Discussion
Vice-Chair Waschura commented on the efforts the design team made to work with the suggestions from the Planning Commission and the surrounding neighbors. He also approved of adding an open space easement, as previously suggested.

Chair Indaco offered a list of her recommendations for approval conditions.

Commissioner Couperus offered comments regarding fire danger and wildlife corridors.

Commissioner Smith had no specific comments to offer.

4 Planning Commission Special Meeting January 13, 2022 Minutes Vice-Chair Waschura stated he wanted to ensure there was a protected wildlife corridor and asked for Planning Director Mangalam’s input.

Planning Director Mangalam stated the easement recommendation illustrated by staff in the presentation was acceptable and would support including the entire area below the home as part of an easement.

Vice-Chair Waschura stated and confirmed his agreement with Chair Indaco’s list of recommendations, which were:

1. Color tinting of all retaining walls, on-site and off-site to blend in with nature.

2. Open space easement on the bottom left of the property

3. A nine- or ten-foot vehicular access to the neighbor’s garden area for something like a two-ton vehicle

4. Remove the east light on the patio entry and replace with landscape lighting MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Chair Indaco motioned to ADOPT a resolution (Attachment 1) to APPROVE the Site Development, and exceptions to the Town's Grading Policy, subject to the listed findings and conditions of approval with these added conditions:

1. Extend the open space easement along the southern portion to include the entire length of the 28ft. roadway easement, which is dedicated to pedestrians and equestrians, allowing vehicular access to the interior of the property

2. Clarify Condition #21 to allow for a nine-foot-wide access for the neighbor above to access the flat portion of his property

3. Eliminate the recessed light on the second floor off the east, leading off the patio The motion was seconded by Vice-Chair Waschura.

MOTION PASSED: 4-0-0-0-1
AYES:

Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Couperus, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Patel

4.3 28001 Elena Road (APN 182-02-016) – File #ZP21-0047 – Lands of Sea Landing LP Zoning Permit for new 6’-0” tall property line fencing and gates.

CEQA Review: Categorical Exemption per Section 15303(e) Project Planner: Jeremy Loh
Continued from October 7, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting Chair Indaco opened the PUBLIC HEARING.

Associate Planner Loh presented the staff report.

The lawyer for the applicant, Stephen Pahl, offered comments and requested permission to change Condition #2 from wood to metal posts.

A question-and-answer session between the Commissioners and Mr. Pahl ensued.

Public Comment
Dru Anderson, a Los Altos Hills resident, offered comments against the proposed fencing project.

5 Planning Commission Special Meeting January 13, 2022 Minutes Michael Grady, a Los Altos Hills resident, offered comments in agreement with Ms.

Anderson's.

Kit Gordon, representing the OSC, offered comments regarding preserving wildlife corridors and shared a map illustrating aquatic resources on and around the property.

Vice-Chair Waschura asked about Ms. Gordon about her statement regarding her inability to walk the property to determine the extent the resident is cooperating.

Kit Gordon responded she asked for permission to walk the pathway easement and was denied access.

Charles Bronitsky, representing one of the neighboring properties, offered comments regarding the proposed fencing project and the applicant's response to the Planning Commission's requests.

Martha Bowden, a Los Altos Hills resident, offered comments against the proposed fencing project.

George Perlegos, a Los Altos Hills resident, offered comments against the proposed fence and gate project.

Stephen Pahl had no further comments in response to public comments.

Chair Indaco closed the PUBLIC HEARING.

Commission Discussion
Chair Indaco commented on the deficiencies in the applicant's application.

Commissioner Couperus shared a presentation and offered comments regarding the Commissioners' requests and the applicant's lack of response to these requests over multiple hearings.

Vice-Chair Waschura expressed his disappointment with this application, agreed with most of Commissioner Couperus' comments, and shared a topographical map of the applicant's property.

He stated he would also like to add another condition to the applicant, which is to provide a map of waterways on the property.

Commissioner Smith commented on the fact that the applicant has ignored the Planning Commission's requests at each meeting and expressed his interest in continuing this project until they can comply with their requests.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Chair Indaco motioned to CONTINUE to a date uncertain, adding a request for waterways information, in addition to the requests stated at the August 5, 2021 and the October 7, 2021 Planning Commission meetings.

The motion was seconded by Commissioner Couperus.

MOTION PASSED: 4-0-0-0-1
AYES:

Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Couperus, Vice-Chair Waschura, Chair Indaco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Patel,

5. REPORTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS
The meeting recessed at 9:09pm.

6 Planning Commission Special Meeting January 13, 2022 Minutes The meeting reconvened at 9:15pm.

5.1 Past Meeting
• December 16, 2021 – Vice-Chair Waschura
Vice-Chair Waschura provided highlights of the past City Council meeting. Of note, it was the Town's first hybrid (in-person and zoom) meeting.

5.1 Upcoming Meeting Assignments
• January 20, 2022 – Chair Indaco
• February 17, 2022 – Commissioner Smith
• March 17, 2022 – Commissioner Patel
• April 21, 2022 – Commissioner Couperus
Chair Indaco confirmed upcoming meeting assignments.

5.3. Report by the Planning Commission subcommittee on Fire Department Standards Relating to ADU and Split-Lot Development.

Vice-Chair Waschura and Commissioner Couperus
Vice-Chair Waschura shared a presentation and provided an update on the subcommittee tasked to work with the County Fire Department on establishing Fire Department requirements for new residences.

Commissioner Couperus offered comments.

Chair Indaco suggested this presentation be sent to the City Council.

Vice-Chair Waschura agreed to forward it on to the City Council.

Planning Director Mangalam requested a copy for the Planning staff.

6. REPORT ON PAST FAST TRACK/SITE DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS

6.1 DECEMBER 14, 2021

CANCELLED

6.2 DECEMBER 21, 2021
26898 Dezahara Way – File # SD21-0085 – Lands of Fey
Site Development Permit for landscape screening, fences, and driveway gate for an approved new residence. APPROVED
10311 Magdalena Road – File # SD21-0011 – Lands of Weingarten Site Development Permit for a major addition and remodel to an existing residence resulting in a 5,587 square-foot, single-story residence with a mezzanine, an attached 688 square-foot garage, a roof deck, and a new swimming pool. The proposed ADU is under a separate approval.

APPROVED

6.3 DECEMBER 28, 2021

CANCELLED

6.4 JANUARY 4, 2022

CANCELLED

6.5 JANUARY 11, 2022
12815 Deer Creek Lane – File #SD21-0048 – Lands of Ng and Kim Site Development Permit for a 6,192 square foot one-story residence with an attached 1,043 square foot, 4-car garage and an attached ADU. One heritage oak is proposed for removal and

7 Planning Commission Special Meeting January 13, 2022 Minutes the existing tennis court and road access will be demolished and filled to restore the property to its original site contours.

APPROVED
Planning Director Mangalam provided updates on past Site Development/Fast Track hearings and noted the new procedures of circulating the Notice of Decision for completed Fast Track hearings.

7. PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT
Planning Director Mangalam provided updates on the Housing Element and the upcoming joint special City Council and Planning Commission meeting on January 19th, 2022. She noted there would be February and April workshops scheduled to gather information from the community regarding this issue.

8. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 9:44 PM by Chair Indaco.

Respectfully submitted,
Keren Brunner
Planning Technician

From: Cheryl Mathews
To: Planning Commission
Cc: Steve Padovan; Jeremy Loh
Subject: Outdoor Lighting Policy - Stop the Glow
Date: Thursday, February 3, 2022 10:30:11 PM
February 3, 2022
Town of Los Altos Hills
26379 Fremont Rd.

Los Altos Hills CA 940222
Re: Planning Commission Meeting 2/3/22 – File #SP19-0007 - Outdoor Lighting Dear Planning Commissioners, Indaco, Waschura, Couperus, Patel, and Smith, Thank you for serving on the Planning Commission and volunteering your time to manage growth in our town while preserving the rural atmosphere of the foothills we all treasure. You have a tough job! I planned to speak at tonight’s Planning Commission meeting.

Unfortunately, the video did not work. I hope you will consider my input on the Outdoor Lighting policy.

I have lived in Los Altos and Los Altos Hills for almost 40 years. Like you, I care deeply about our town. As a Building Biologist, I have the opportunity to visit many of the modern homes built in our area. The houses are truly magnificent, with massive glass walls, windows, and doors. The design trend is moving toward “glasshouses” with enormous walls constructed of glass. The interior illumination of these modern homes creates light pollution in our town.

Thank you for reviewing our “outdoor” lighting policy. I respectfully ask that you also consider how “indoor lighting” in these glass homes is illuminating and destroying the natural night environment in our neighborhoods. There is a gorgeous new modern home across the street from me. When the lights are on at night, the entire house glows where we used to see stars out the bedroom window. During the day, the sun's reflection turns the home's two-story glass walls green. There’s a new modern home planned next door to me that appears to be a "glass house" that utilizes “smart glass”. This type of design is not preserving the rural atmosphere of the foothills.

Are “glass homes” dark sky compliant when they shine into neighboring properties and create skyglow? Homes with significant amounts of glazing need to consider how interior lighting will affect the outdoor environment and wildlife. Many new homes with elaborate interior and exterior lighting do not meet the intent of our current lighting policy, which states: to assure that the open and peaceful character of the town is maintained and lighting does not intrude on the privacy of neighbors, light pollution is reduced, and glare is minimized onto adjacent properties.

Thank you in advance for addressing indoor and outdoor lighting and creating a policy that reduces light pollution generated by many new modern homes in our town.

Here is a resource that might be helpful as you work through these issues.

IDA - International Dark-Sky Association - Measuring Light Pollution Attachment 8

https://www.darksky.org/light-pollution/measuring-light-pollution/ All the best,
Cheryl Mathews

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS March 17, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A TEN (10) YEAR RENEWAL OF THE

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE EXISTING WIRELESS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 27210 ALTAMONT ROAD; FILE# CUP21-0003.

FROM: Steve Padovan, Principal Planner
Sofia Mangalam, Planning Director
APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) to approve a ten (10) year renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for the wireless telecommunications facility at 27210 Altamont Road (Westwind Barn).

BACKGROUND
The subject property is a 1.69-acre parcel located on the south side of Altamont Road. The parcel is owned by the Town of Los Altos Hills and is currently developed with the Westwind Community Barn, a horse boarding and riding facility owned by the Town, along with a wireless telecommunication facility owned by American Tower. The existing wireless facility is located on the southeast portion of the property and consists of a 71-foot tall monopine behind the barn and an enclosed equipment pad measuring 40 feet by 18 feet located on the easterly property line abutting Byrne Preserve. The monopole is located outside of the property line setbacks and the equipment area is well screened by existing vegetation and not visible from Altamont Road or surrounding residences.

Fig 1: Location Map Source: Google Maps
Monopine
AGENDA ITEM #10.C

Staff Report to the City Council
CUP Renewal for 27210 Altamont Road
March 17, 2022

On November 3, 2005, the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Verizon Wireless to construct a monopine with nine (9) panel antennas, centered at 62 feet above the ground, along with associated telecom equipment within an enclosed 40’ x 18’ equipment area (File #177-05-ZP-SD-CUP-VAR). The conditions required a CUP renewal after 5 years, the standard at the time. The following year (July 2006), the City Council approved a co-location for T-Mobile on the monopine for six (6) panel antennas, centered at 47 feet above the ground, and associated ground mounted equipment in the existing enclosure (File #121-06-SD-CUP).

On June 17, 2010, the City Council approved a CUP renewal (File #16-10-CUP) which extended the facility operations for an additional 10 years based on California State Government Code Section 65964(b) which changed the time period for a renewal from 5 to 10 years. As a result, the CUP was extended for a 10-year period to June 2020. In the intervening years, the monopine, equipment pad, and ground lease was transferred to American Tower from Verizon.

Due to the change in ownership of the tower and the lease area, the Covid19 pandemic, and the need to negotiate an extension of the ground lease with the Town, the submittal of a CUP renewal application was delayed. In July 2021, a 15-year ground lease extension was granted by the City Council for the wireless facility. and the CUP renewal application was submitted. The applicant is not requesting any modification to the monopine or any equipment on the site.

February 3, 2022 Planning Commission Meeting
The CUP renewal was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 3, 2022. One public comment in support of the project was received. After a thorough review of the information, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the 10-year renewal.

Municipal Code
The following Zoning Code sections are applicable to this project:

Section 10-1.1304 Wireless telecommunications facility permit required.

No wireless telecommunications facility shall be located or modified within the Town on any property, including the public right-of-way, without the issuance of a site development permit or conditional use permit.

Section 10-1.1310 Conditions of approval for all facilities.

All facilities upon approval are subject to the conditions of approval as included in the Exhibit B.

Section 10-1.1316 Permit expiration.

A permit for any wireless telecommunications facility shall be valid for a period of ten (10) years.

The request for an extension shall be decided by the Planning Commission if the permit expired before the application is made for an extension or if the Planning Director refers the matter to the Planning Commission.

Staff Report to the City Council
CUP Renewal for 27210 Altamont Road
March 17, 2022

Section 10-1.1006
Following the recommendation to the City Council related to a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission shall transmit a record of its action to the City Council and the City Clerk.

The transmittal shall state the full record of the findings made and shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk by appropriate reference.

DISCUSSION
The recently adopted Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance states that a request for a CUP extension shall be decided by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing if the permit expired before the application is made for an extension, or if the Planning Director refers the matter to the Planning Commission. Being that the CUP expired prior to the submittal of an extension, the Planning Commission is the decision-making authority on this application.

However, the subject property is owned by the Town of Los Altos Hills. Therefore, staff is processing the application consistent with Section 10-1.1006 of the Zoning Code which states that the Planning Commission can act as a recommending body to the City Council on CUP applications.

A Conditional Use Permit renewal for a wireless facility can be approved if the City Council finds that the facility operates in compliance with the Town’s adopted Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance, the site is in compliance with all previously approved conditions of approval, and there are no outstanding code violations related to the facility.

The existing wireless telecommunications facility has been operating on the subject property for over 15 years. Staff is not aware of any recent or historic complaints on the site and the facility is operating in compliance with the previously approved conditions of approval. Existing vegetation and landscape screening that was planted when the site was initially constructed is intact, appears healthy, and substantially screens the equipment area. The monopine is located behind the barn which screens the entire lower half of the structure from Altamont Road and the surrounding homes. Staff also conducted an inspection of the property and found it to be adequately maintained, clean, and in compliance with the previous conditions of approval.

A Radio Frequency Site Compliance Report was submitted with the CUP renewal and the report states that the wireless facility is compliant with FCC rules and regulations (see Attachment 3).

Appendix 3 of the report summarizes the radio frequency emissions taken at specific locations around the site and all measurements are below the maximum permitted by the FCC.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65964 (b), the duration of time for any permit renewal for a wireless telecommunications facility shall be a minimum of 10 years. Condition #12 states that the CUP will expire in 2032.

NOTICING/PUBLIC OUTREACH
The public was advised of this Public Hearing in the following ways:
• Mailing to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the property – March 4, 2022.

Staff Report to the City Council
CUP Renewal for 27210 Altamont Road
March 17, 2022

• Notice in the Los Altos Town Crier – March 4, 2022
• Posted at the project site – March 4, 2022
• Town Website: www.losaltoshills.ca.gov – March 4, 2022 To date, staff has not received any written public comments on the proposed project. One verbal comment in support of the project was received at the February 3, 2022 Planning Commission meeting.
2022 COUNCIL PRIORITIES
This action is consistent with the value/priority area “Protect and Maintain Infrastructure” of the City Council Strategic Priorities Implementation Plan. This wireless site provides vital emergency communications infrastructure in the upper Altamont Road area and provides vital voice and data communications for many homes in the surrounding area.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact related to the approval of a 10-year renewal to the existing CUP. The City Council approved a 15-year extension to the ground lease for the facility in July 2021 and the Town currently receives $4,407.12 per month in revenue ($52,885 per year).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed designation is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(b) of the CEQA Guidelines – No modifications to an existing facility.

CONCLUSION
The facility is operating in compliance with previous conditions of approval and the Town’s wireless regulations. No changes to structures or equipment are proposed and the applicant has submitted a radio frequency report demonstrating that the facility is currently operating below FCC standards.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Resolution
Attachment 2: Applicant’s Renewal Letter, Visual Analysis, and Noise Analysis Attachment 3: Radio Frequency Site Compliance Report
Attachment 4: Existing Site Plans

Resolution ____-22 Page 1
RESOLUTION ___-22

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING A 10-YEAR RENEWAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO

OPERATE A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT
27210 ALTAMONT ROAD
(LANDS OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS; FILE #CUP21-0003) WHEREAS, wireless telecommunications facilities are a conditional use in the ResidentialAgricultural Zoning District of the Town of Los Altos Hills; and WHEREAS, Article 13 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates wireless telecommunications facilities; and
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2005, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Verizon Wireless to construct a wireless telecommunications facility at 27210 Altamont Road (File #177-05-ZP-SD-CUP-VAR) which included a monopine, antennas and related equipment area; and
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2010, the City Council approved a 10-year renewal of the CUP (File #16-10-CUP); and
WHEREAS, in July 2021, the City Council approved a 15-year extension of the ground lease for the wireless facility; and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2021, the Town received an application to renew the CUP for an additional 10-year period with no proposed modifications to the monopole or equipment area (File #CUP21-0003); and
WHEREAS, the applicant provided a Radio Frequency Site Compliance Report indicating the wireless telecommunications facility is compliant with federal regulations and operating under the maximum permissible exposure limits for the public; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Town of Los Altos Hills held a duly noticed public hearing on February 3, 2022, considered all written documentation and public comments, and voted 5-0 to forward a recommendation to City Council to approve the 10-year renewal of the CUP subject to the conditions of approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills held a duly noticed public hearing on March 17, 2022 and considered all written documentation and public comments; and WHEREAS, the 10-year renewal of the Conditional Use Permit is categorically exempt from the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301(b) of the CEQA Guidelines because these are no modifications proposed to an existing public utility facility.

Attachment 1
Revised and Posted 3/16/22

Resolution ____-22 Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does RESOLVE as follows:

The Town hereby approves File #CUP21-0003 for a 10-year renewal of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a wireless telecommunications facility at 27210 Altamont Road, subject to the findings and conditions of approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A and B.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of March 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

BY: _______________________________
George Tyson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Deborah Padovan, City Clerk

Resolution ____-22 Page 3

EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS FOR A 10-YEAR RENEWAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY;

LANDS OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
(APPLICANT: ATC SEQUOIA LLC)
27210 ALTAMONT ROAD; FILE #CUP21-0003

1. The proposed use or facility is properly located in relation to the community as a whole, land uses, and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity.

The telecommunications site was established in 2005 and is located on Town owned property near the highest point on a ridge. The facility provides highly valued cellular and internet service for Verizon and T-Mobile customers in the upper Altamont Road area and there are no other telecommunications sites in Los Altos Hills within a one-mile radius. The site is easily accessible and located along a neighborhood collector street.

2. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, landscaping, and such other features as may be required by this chapter or, will be needed to assure that the proposed use will be reasonably compatible with land uses normally permitted in the surrounding area.

The facility is located at the Westwind Barn, a 1.7-acre publicly owned property that contains a barn and horse-riding facility. The amount of area occupied by the monopine and the equipment lease area encompass less than 1,000 square feet of area on the 74,000 square foot lot. The 750 square foot equipment area has adequate screening and does not impact operations at the barn.

3. The site for the proposed use will be served by streets and highways of adequate width and pavement to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.

The site is located on a neighborhood collector street which is adequate in width and pavement to support the vehicles that service the facility. In addition, the site is un-manned and traffic generated by service vehicles is minimal and has no impact on traffic in the area.

4. The proposed use will not adversely affect the abutting property or the permitted use thereof.

The wireless telecommunications facility has been operating on the property for the last 17 years and it provides highly valued cellular and internet service for Verizon and T-Mobile customers in the upper Altamont Road area. There have been no complaints received from surrounding neighbors in the last 10 years and the equipment and monopine are located at the back of the barn, furthest from surrounding residences.

5. The proposed facility complies with all applicable provisions of the Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance.

Resolution ____-22 Page 4
The existing facility was established under a previous wireless communications facilities policy that has since been superseded by the recently adopted Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance. A review of the existing structures and equipment at the site has determined that the facility is compliant with the current ordinance with regard to site location, aesthetics, setbacks and noise. In addition, the radio frequency site compliance report shows that the facility is operating within FCC standards and that emissions are well below the maximum permitted.

6. The proposed facility has been designed and located to achieve compatibility with the community to the maximum extent reasonably feasible.

The facility contains a 71-foot tall monopine, which is a tower with antennas that has been camouflaged to look like a conifer tree. The monopine design blends well with the forested hillside behind the property and with the trees that surround the Westwind Barn. In addition, the equipment area has a low wall that is screened from the road and surrounding residences by dense vegetation.

7. The applicant has submitted a statement of its willingness to allow other carriers to collocate on the proposed wireless telecommunications facility wherever technically and economically feasible and where collocation would not harm community compatibility.

There are currently two cellular providers co-located on the same monopine and using the same equipment area.

8. Noise generated by equipment will not be excessive, annoying nor be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare and will not exceed the standards set forth in this article.

The existing equipment area is surrounded by a 5-foot tall masonry wall that provides a sound barrier between the wireless equipment and the surrounding homes and the equipment is located behind the barn structure. In addition, the existing equipment does not produce sound levels at the property line in excess of those permitted by the Town’s noise regulations.

Resolution ____-22 Page 5

EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS FOR A 10-YEAR RENEWAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY;

LANDS OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
(APPLICANT: ATC SEQUOIA LLC)
27210 ALTAMONT ROAD; FILE #CUP21-0003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. Any changes or revisions to the telecommunications facility or its use shall require an amendment to the applicable permit(s). Additionally, the Planning Director may schedule a review or revocation hearing before the Planning Commission regarding any Conditional Use Permit, if any condition of approval is not being met or the facility is being used inconsistent with the approved use or in violation of Town development codes.

2. No modifications to the approved plans are allowed except as otherwise first reviewed and approved in writing by the Planning Director or by action of the Planning Commission, depending on the scope of the changes, and consistent with the requirements of Section 6409(a) as applicable.

3. The applicant shall be strictly liable for interference caused by the wireless communications facilities with the Town’s emergency communications systems. The operator shall be responsible for all labor and equipment costs for determining the source of the interference and all costs associated with eliminating the interference (including, but not limited to, engineering analysis, filtering and installing directional antennas).

4. As is required for other construction projects within the Town, the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town of Los Altos Hills and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding related to the Tenant’s use of the premises against the Town of Los Altos Hills or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the project to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that the Applicant’s duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the Town’s promptly notifying the Applicant of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the Town’s full cooperation in the defense of such actions or proceedings.

5. The facility shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the EME Report for the site dated September 19, 2021. At staff’s discretion, and not more than once a year, or no later than thirty (30) days after installation and initial operation of any new pole mounted equipment, the Town may require that the site operator retain the services of qualified professionals to conduct testing of the radio frequency electromagnetic field emissions and provide a report of such testing in writing to the Planning Department. The report shall compare the results of the testing to the applicable federal emission standards. If at any time the emission levels are shown not to comply with Federal standards, the Conditional Use Permit shall be scheduled for a revocation hearing before the Planning Commission.

Resolution ____-22 Page 6

6. The operator of the site shall be responsible for repair or repainting of the proposed facilities in case of vandalism or wear and must do so within seventy-two (72) hours of notice by the Town that a complaint has been received.

7. The communications facility shall comply with the Town’s noise ordinance at all times. If the Town receives a complaint of excessive noise at the facility, then the applicant shall perform an acoustical analysis of the ground equipment to demonstrate that noise emissions from the equipment is at or below forty (40) dB at the property line.

8. Should the use be discontinued by the carrier, all facilities will be removed not later than 60 days after discontinuance of the use or abandonment.

9. All new pole mounted antennas, equipment and support structures shall not extend beyond the existing monopine canopy. All new antennas shall be covered with "needle socks" matching the artificial foliage on the monopine and all cables, support structures and all other associated equipment on the monopine shall be painted to match the color of the existing foliage and pole, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.

10. No light fixtures are permitted on the monopine. Two service lights (one service light for each carrier’s equipment area), not to exceed 600 lumens, may be installed within the equipment area for emergency repairs. The light fixture shall be mounted no higher than the height of the enclosure wall and shall be shielded to direct light downward.

11. The applicant shall not cause interference in the frequencies allocated as primary to the amateur radio service and may be required to correct any and all future interference problems experienced by other licensed services.

12. The applicant shall not place any facilities that will deny access to, or otherwise interfere with, any public utility, easement, or right-of-way located on the site. The applicant shall allow the Town reasonable access to, and maintenance of, all utilities and existing public improvements within or adjacent to the site, including, but not limited to, pavement, trees, public utilities, lighting and public signage.

13. At all times, all required notices and signs shall be posted on the site as required by the FCC and California Public Utilities Commission, and as approved by the Town. The location and dimensions of a sign bearing the emergency contact name and telephone number shall be posted pursuant to the approved plans.

14. All conditions of approval shall be binding as to the applicant and all successors in interest to applicant.

15. The use permit shall expire ten (10) years from the date of approval (March 17, 2032).

Renewal of the permit must be requested in writing, with appropriate fees, prior to the expiration date.

Resolution ____-22 Page 7
Please refer to the Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein. If you believe that these conditions impose any fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions under the California Government Code Section 66000, you are hereby notified that these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and/or a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest such fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.

EME Audit Report
ATC SITE #:
413837
ATC SITE NAME:

Pagemill Highlands CA
LOCATION:

Los Altos Hills, California
COMPANY:

American Tower
Woburn, Massachusetts
September 19th, 2021

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 1
Contents

DISCLAIMER NOTICE..............................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................3 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................................................3 ASSESSMENT OF SITE 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA...................................................................4 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS ..............................................................................................................................4 DIMINISHING RADIATION LEVELS...................................................................................................................4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................5 APPENDIX 1 SATELLITE PHOTOGRAPH (MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS).......................................6 APPENDIX 2.0 MEASUREMENT DATA (LOCATION #1).........................................................................7 APPENDIX 2.1 MEASUREMENT DATA (LOCATION #2).........................................................................8 APPENDIX 2.2 MEASUREMENT DATA (LOCATION #3).........................................................................9 APPENDIX 2.3 MEASUREMENT DATA (LOCATION #4)......................................................................10 APPENDIX 2.4 MEASUREMENT DATA (LOCATION #5)......................................................................11 APPENDIX 3 MEASUREMENT LEVEL TABLES........................................................................................12 APPENDIX 4 PREDICTED DIMINISHING RF LEVELS............................................................................13 APPENDIX 5 DIMINISHING RF LEVEL STUDY AREA............................................................................14 APPENDIX 6.0 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ............................................................................................................15 APPENDIX 6.1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ............................................................................................................16 APPENDIX 6.2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ............................................................................................................17

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 2
Disclaimer Notice
This work is based upon our best interpretation of available information.

However, these data and their interpretation are constantly changing.

Therefore, we do not warrant that any undertaking based on this report will be successful, or that others will not require further research or actions in support of this proposal or future undertaking. In the event of errors, our liability is strictly limited to replacement of this document with a corrected one. Liability for consequential damages is specifically disclaimed. Any use of this document constitutes an agreement to hold Tower Engineering Professionals and its employees harmless and indemnify it for all liability, claims, demands, and litigation expenses and attorney’s fees arising out of such use.

Work product documents released prior to account settlement remain the sole property of Tower Engineering Professionals and must be returned on demand. Underlying work notes and data relating to this document remain the property of Tower Engineering Professionals. This document shall not be reproduced in whole or part without permission of Tower Engineering Professionals. Any dispute hereunder shall be adjudicated in North Carolina. Any use or retention of this document constitutes acceptance of these terms, the entire work product, and all charges associated therewith.

COPYRIGHT © 2021 BY

TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 3

EME AUDIT REPORT
413837 Pagemill Highlands CA
Los Altos Hills, CA

INTRODUCTION
Tower Engineering Professionals (TEP) of Raleigh, North Carolina has been retained by American Tower (ATC) of Woburn, Massachusetts to audit compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy at this site. This audit provides information gathered during a site visit to make measurements of conditions after the American Tower Corporation facilities began operating and includes photographs and annotated architectural drawings, where required.

Site mitigation options have been assessed and recommendations made where the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) could be exceeded in accessible areas.

METHODOLOGY
TEP personnel conducted field verification of existing antenna locations and made site measurements of all existing RF contributions to the site on September 14th, 2021. Measurements were performed using a NARDA model 550 broadband field meter, serial number F-0223, with a shaped isotropic probe, model EA5091, serial number 01150. This system is considered an “industry standard” for making Electromagnetic Environment (EME) measurements. Measurements were taken as a percent of MPE for the Occupational/Controlled standard.

The FCC guidelines define two separate tiers of exposure limits. As defined by the FCC, these limits are:

General population/uncontrolled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when the general public is exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment related.

Occupational/controlled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 4
ASSESSMENT OF SITE 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA
This is an existing 69’ stealth monopine located on a municipally owned and active horse ranch. The ranch consists of one barn used for the stabling of horses and several corrals for equestrian training. The equipment pad is approximately 20’ remote from the monopine. The pad is secured by a fence and appropriate signage is in place. Site photos may be located in Appendix 6.

MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
The governing jurisdiction has requested that measurements be performed at the following locations:

1. At the nearest structure

2. 50’ from the monopine

3. 100’ from the monopine

4. Nearest residence property line
As this is an active horse ranch with on-going equestrian activities throughout the day, some ranch areas were restricted and not accessible to TEP personnel.

TEP personnel where, however, able to perform measurements in accordance with the jurisdiction’s requirements.

In accordance with FCC Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) bulletin OET65, TEP performed measurements over a 30 minute period, at one minute intervals, at five locations. These locations were selected to satisfy the four locations specified by the jurisdiction and includes one measurement performed at the equipment pad. These locations may be seen on the Satellite Photo located in Appendix 1. Measurements were made at approx. 6’ above ground as this is the average human height. Results of these measurements are located in Appendix 2. A table listing the maximum, average, and minimum measured levels may be located in Appendix 3.

DIMINISHING RADIATION LEVELS
The jurisdiction also requested that a chart demonstrating the diminishing RF level at increased distances from the monopine be provided. As the output power of wireless sites varies based on the amount of traffic through the site at any given point of time, demonstrating this through measurements is not possible. The output power will also vary from sector to sector for the same reason. In order to satisfy this requirement, TEP used actual measured data to calibrate a Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (NIER) model of this site.

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 5
The model was constructed using industry standard and FCC recognized software. Standard wireless carrier configurations were used with equipment operating at full output powers. A 200’ area was studied in all directions from the monopine. During the measurement activity, the Alpha Sector, which included the 100’ measurement location, was operating at close to full power.

Radiation levels diminish logarithmically and are affected by ground reflections and obstructions such as buildings. Antenna design will also affect the radiation at ground level. All antennae are designed to limit downward radiation for the protection of workers and to concentrate energy in the far field. As this is the case, it is normal for antennae mounted low on a tower to exhibit an increase in radiation strength for a number of feet before starting to decrease with distance.

This can be seen in the chart located in Appendix 4. If the modeled radiation level at 100’ is compared with the 100’ measured data, we see that the model tracks closely with the actual measured level. This demonstrates that the modeled levels are valid. This chart and predicted levels are located in Appendix

4. A satellite photo of the study area is located in Appendix 5.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
• This American Tower Corporation site IS in compliance with the guidelines described in FCC OET-65.
• TEP recommends that any worker attempting to service this antenna facility have RF awareness training and wear a personal RF monitor. • TEP recommends placement of RF signage in accordance with ATC RF signage policy.
• Procedures described in FCC OET-65 should be followed during the performance of work on or near the antenna facilities.

September19th, 2021 Michael W. Hayden NCE CPBE CBNT AMD Director: RF Designs and Services
Tower Engineering Professionals

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 6

APPENDIX 1 Satellite Photograph (Measurement Locations)

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 7
APPENDIX 2.0 Measurement Data (Location #1)

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:17:59 PM

Instrument / Site
Meter Probe
Model: NBM-550
S/N: F-0223
Model: EA5091
S/N: 01182
Calibration Due Date
06/10/2022
Calibration Due Date
06/12/2022
Site Coordinates
American Tower
Site #: 413837
Site Name: Pagemill Highlands CA

37.364812
-122.159540
Comment
Measurement Location #1
Equipment Pad
Test Report

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:17:59 PM

Measured Values
Zoomed
Timer: Start Time 02:17:59 PM, Period 0h 30' 0'', Interval 60s Index Date/Time Zero Max (E-Field) Avg (E-Field) Min (E-Field) 1 09/14/2021 02:18:59 PM 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 2 09/14/2021 02:19:59 PM 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 3 09/14/2021 02:20:59 PM 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 4 09/14/2021 02:21:59 PM 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 5 09/14/2021 02:22:59 PM 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 6 09/14/2021 02:23:59 PM 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 0.0000 % STD 7 09/14/2021 02:24:59 PM 0.0355 % STD 0.0004 % STD 0.0000 % STD 8 09/14/2021 02:25:59 PM 0.0415 % STD 0.0008 % STD 0.0000 % STD 9 09/14/2021 02:26:59 PM 0.0652 % STD 0.0057 % STD 0.0000 % STD 10 09/14/2021 02:27:59 PM 0.1540 % STD 0.0371 % STD 0.0000 % STD 11 09/14/2021 02:28:59 PM 0.1481 % STD 0.0590 % STD 0.0000 % STD 12 09/14/2021 02:29:59 PM 0.1540 % STD 0.0676 % STD 0.0000 % STD 13 09/14/2021 02:30:59 PM 0.2192 % STD 0.0878 % STD 0.0059 % STD 14 09/14/2021 02:31:59 PM 0.2607 % STD 0.1480 % STD 0.0829 % STD 15 09/14/2021 02:32:59 PM 0.2370 % STD 0.1582 % STD 0.0533 % STD 16 09/14/2021 02:33:59 PM ! 0.1718 % STD 0.0323 % STD 0.0000 % STD 17 09/14/2021 02:34:59 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0117 % STD 0.0000 % STD 18 09/14/2021 02:35:59 PM 0.0773 % STD 0.0058 % STD 0.0000 % STD 19 09/14/2021 02:36:59 PM 0.0442 % STD 0.0018 % STD 0.0000 % STD 20 09/14/2021 02:37:59 PM 0.0553 % STD 0.0085 % STD 0.0000 % STD 21 09/14/2021 02:38:59 PM 0.0608 % STD 0.0029 % STD 0.0000 % STD 22 09/14/2021 02:39:59 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0091 % STD 0.0000 % STD 23 09/14/2021 02:40:59 PM 0.0663 % STD 0.0089 % STD 0.0000 % STD 24 09/14/2021 02:41:59 PM 0.1105 % STD 0.0185 % STD 0.0000 % STD 25 09/14/2021 02:42:59 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0147 % STD 0.0000 % STD 26 09/14/2021 02:43:59 PM 0.0332 % STD 0.0008 % STD 0.0000 % STD 27 09/14/2021 02:44:59 PM 0.0332 % STD 0.0013 % STD 0.0000 % STD 28 09/14/2021 02:45:59 PM 0.0497 % STD 0.0027 % STD 0.0000 % STD 29 09/14/2021 02:46:59 PM 0.0553 % STD 0.0023 % STD 0.0000 % STD 30 09/14/2021 02:47:59 PM 0.0663 % STD 0.0022 % STD 0.0000 % STD

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:17:59 PM

Graph

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:17:59 PM

Images

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:17:59 PM

Parameters
Operating Mode HIGH FREQUENCY
Number of Sub-Indices 30
Storing Date 09/14/2021
Storing Time 02:17:59 PM
Dataset Type TIM
Voice Comment Available NO
Dataset Fine Type T1
GPS Flag NO
Device Product Name NBM-550
Device Serial Number F-0223
Device Cal Due Date 06/10/2022
Probe Product Name EA5091
Probe Serial Number 01182
Probe Cal Due Date 06/12/2022
Probe Field Type E
Probe Connection Type C
Probe Lower Frequency Limit A 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit A 50 GHz
Probe Lower Frequency Limit B 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit B 50 GHz
Probe Emin A 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax A 150.0 V/m
Probe Emin B 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax B 150.0 V/m
Shaped Probe YES
Standard ID 1
Standard Name FCC96-326,occ
Apply Standard OFF
Frequency 300 MHz
Apply Correction Frequency OFF
Eref_E(f) 1.000 V/m
Eref_H(f) 1.000 V/m
Combi Probe Use E_H
Unit mW/cm²
Results Format FIXED
Auto-Zero Interval 15 min
Result Type -
Averaging Time -
Average Progress -
Spatial AVG Mode -
Store Condition -
Storing Range -
Cond. Stop Time -
Upper Threshold -
Lower Threshold -
Timer Interval 60 sec
Timer Duration 00:30:00
History Time Scale -
Time progress of current segment -

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 8
APPENDIX 2.1 Measurement Data (Location #2)

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:54:50 PM
`Page 1
Instrument / Site
Meter Probe
Model: NBM-550
S/N: F-0223
Model: EA5091
S/N: 01182
Calibration Due Date
06/10/2022
Calibration Due Date
06/12/2022
Site Coordinates
American Tower
Site #: 413837
Site Name: Pagemill Highlands CA

37.364795
-122.159722
Comment
Measurement Location #2
Closest Building
Test Report

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:54:50 PM
`Page 2
Measured Values
Zoomed
Timer: Start Time 02:54:50 PM, Period 0h 30' 0'', Interval 60s Index Date/Time Zero Max (E-Field) Avg (E-Field) Min (E-Field) 1 09/14/2021 02:55:50 PM 0.1381 % STD 0.0284 % STD 0.0000 % STD 2 09/14/2021 02:56:50 PM 0.1547 % STD 0.0531 % STD 0.0000 % STD 3 09/14/2021 02:57:50 PM 0.0994 % STD 0.0373 % STD 0.0000 % STD 4 09/14/2021 02:58:50 PM 0.1381 % STD 0.0201 % STD 0.0000 % STD 5 09/14/2021 02:59:50 PM 0.1326 % STD 0.0476 % STD 0.0000 % STD 6 09/14/2021 03:00:50 PM 0.1437 % STD 0.0424 % STD 0.0000 % STD 7 09/14/2021 03:01:50 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0275 % STD 0.0000 % STD 8 09/14/2021 03:02:50 PM 0.1215 % STD 0.0297 % STD 0.0000 % STD 9 09/14/2021 03:03:50 PM 0.1215 % STD 0.0289 % STD 0.0000 % STD 10 09/14/2021 03:04:50 PM 0.1326 % STD 0.0435 % STD 0.0000 % STD 11 09/14/2021 03:05:50 PM 0.0994 % STD 0.0252 % STD 0.0000 % STD 12 09/14/2021 03:06:50 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0319 % STD 0.0000 % STD 13 09/14/2021 03:07:50 PM 0.1215 % STD 0.0349 % STD 0.0000 % STD 14 09/14/2021 03:08:50 PM 0.1326 % STD 0.0307 % STD 0.0000 % STD 15 09/14/2021 03:09:50 PM 0.1105 % STD 0.0327 % STD 0.0000 % STD 16 09/14/2021 03:10:50 PM ! 0.1381 % STD 0.0307 % STD 0.0000 % STD 17 09/14/2021 03:11:50 PM 0.1437 % STD 0.0495 % STD 0.0000 % STD 18 09/14/2021 03:12:50 PM 0.1326 % STD 0.0385 % STD 0.0000 % STD 19 09/14/2021 03:13:50 PM 0.1215 % STD 0.0379 % STD 0.0000 % STD 20 09/14/2021 03:14:50 PM 0.1602 % STD 0.0451 % STD 0.0000 % STD 21 09/14/2021 03:15:50 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0168 % STD 0.0000 % STD 22 09/14/2021 03:16:50 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0153 % STD 0.0000 % STD 23 09/14/2021 03:17:50 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0231 % STD 0.0000 % STD 24 09/14/2021 03:18:50 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0167 % STD 0.0000 % STD 25 09/14/2021 03:19:50 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0317 % STD 0.0000 % STD 26 09/14/2021 03:20:50 PM 0.1658 % STD 0.0592 % STD 0.0000 % STD 27 09/14/2021 03:21:50 PM 0.1381 % STD 0.0641 % STD 0.0000 % STD 28 09/14/2021 03:22:50 PM 0.1713 % STD 0.0731 % STD 0.0000 % STD 29 09/14/2021 03:23:50 PM 0.1547 % STD 0.0543 % STD 0.0000 % STD 30 09/14/2021 03:24:50 PM 0.1492 % STD 0.0572 % STD 0.0000 % STD

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:54:50 PM
`Page 3
Graph

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:54:50 PM
`Page 4
Images

Date 09/14/2021
Time 02:54:50 PM
`Page 5
Parameters
Operating Mode HIGH FREQUENCY
Number of Sub-Indices 30
Storing Date 09/14/2021
Storing Time 02:54:50 PM
Dataset Type TIM
Voice Comment Available NO
Dataset Fine Type T1
GPS Flag NO
Device Product Name NBM-550
Device Serial Number F-0223
Device Cal Due Date 06/10/2022
Probe Product Name EA5091
Probe Serial Number 01182
Probe Cal Due Date 06/12/2022
Probe Field Type E
Probe Connection Type C
Probe Lower Frequency Limit A 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit A 50 GHz
Probe Lower Frequency Limit B 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit B 50 GHz
Probe Emin A 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax A 150.0 V/m
Probe Emin B 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax B 150.0 V/m
Shaped Probe YES
Standard ID 1
Standard Name FCC96-326,occ
Apply Standard OFF
Frequency 300 MHz
Apply Correction Frequency OFF
Eref_E(f) 1.000 V/m
Eref_H(f) 1.000 V/m
Combi Probe Use E_H
Unit mW/cm²
Results Format FIXED
Auto-Zero Interval 15 min
Result Type -
Averaging Time -
Average Progress -
Spatial AVG Mode -
Store Condition -
Storing Range -
Cond. Stop Time -
Upper Threshold -
Lower Threshold -
Timer Interval 60 sec
Timer Duration 00:30:00
History Time Scale -
Time progress of current segment -

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 9
APPENDIX 2.2 Measurement Data (Location #3)

Date 09/14/2021
Time 03:28:25 PM

Instrument / Site
Meter Probe
Model: NBM-550
S/N: F-0223
Model: EA5091
S/N: 01182
Calibration Due Date
06/10/2022
Calibration Due Date
06/12/2022
Site Coordinates
American Tower
Site #: 413837
Site Name: Pagemill Highlands CA

37.364763
-122.1559894
Comment
Measurement Location #3
50' Mark From Tower
Test Report

Date 09/14/2021
Time 03:28:25 PM

Measured Values
Zoomed
Timer: Start Time 03:28:25 PM, Period 0h 30' 0'', Interval 60s Index Date/Time Zero Max (E-Field) Avg (E-Field) Min (E-Field) 1 09/14/2021 03:29:25 PM 0.0442 % STD 0.0014 % STD 0.0000 % STD 2 09/14/2021 03:30:25 PM 0.0332 % STD 0.0007 % STD 0.0000 % STD 3 09/14/2021 03:31:25 PM 0.0332 % STD 0.0010 % STD 0.0000 % STD 4 09/14/2021 03:32:25 PM 0.0608 % STD 0.0011 % STD 0.0000 % STD 5 09/14/2021 03:33:25 PM 0.0553 % STD 0.0027 % STD 0.0000 % STD 6 09/14/2021 03:34:25 PM 0.0276 % STD 0.0006 % STD 0.0000 % STD 7 09/14/2021 03:35:25 PM 0.0387 % STD 0.0005 % STD 0.0000 % STD 8 09/14/2021 03:36:25 PM 0.0387 % STD 0.0009 % STD 0.0000 % STD 9 09/14/2021 03:37:25 PM 0.0773 % STD 0.0069 % STD 0.0000 % STD 10 09/14/2021 03:38:25 PM 0.0663 % STD 0.0034 % STD 0.0000 % STD 11 09/14/2021 03:39:25 PM 0.0663 % STD 0.0017 % STD 0.0000 % STD 12 09/14/2021 03:40:25 PM 0.0166 % STD 0.0001 % STD 0.0000 % STD 13 09/14/2021 03:41:25 PM 0.0442 % STD 0.0024 % STD 0.0000 % STD 14 09/14/2021 03:42:25 PM 0.0718 % STD 0.0049 % STD 0.0000 % STD 15 09/14/2021 03:43:25 PM ! 0.0829 % STD 0.0087 % STD 0.0000 % STD 16 09/14/2021 03:44:25 PM 0.0773 % STD 0.0092 % STD 0.0000 % STD 17 09/14/2021 03:45:25 PM 0.0718 % STD 0.0090 % STD 0.0000 % STD 18 09/14/2021 03:46:25 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0132 % STD 0.0000 % STD 19 09/14/2021 03:47:25 PM 0.0553 % STD 0.0027 % STD 0.0000 % STD 20 09/14/2021 03:48:25 PM 0.0497 % STD 0.0027 % STD 0.0000 % STD 21 09/14/2021 03:49:25 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0086 % STD 0.0000 % STD 22 09/14/2021 03:50:25 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0179 % STD 0.0000 % STD 23 09/14/2021 03:51:25 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0139 % STD 0.0000 % STD 24 09/14/2021 03:52:25 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0174 % STD 0.0000 % STD 25 09/14/2021 03:53:25 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0167 % STD 0.0000 % STD 26 09/14/2021 03:54:25 PM 0.1381 % STD 0.0422 % STD 0.0000 % STD 27 09/14/2021 03:55:25 PM 0.1160 % STD 0.0419 % STD 0.0000 % STD 28 09/14/2021 03:56:25 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0190 % STD 0.0000 % STD 29 09/14/2021 03:57:25 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0179 % STD 0.0000 % STD 30 09/14/2021 03:58:25 PM ! 0.0939 % STD 0.0196 % STD 0.0000 % STD

Date 09/14/2021
Time 03:28:25 PM

Graph

Date 09/14/2021
Time 03:28:25 PM

Images

Date 09/14/2021
Time 03:28:25 PM

Parameters
Operating Mode HIGH FREQUENCY
Number of Sub-Indices 30
Storing Date 09/14/2021
Storing Time 03:28:25 PM
Dataset Type TIM
Voice Comment Available NO
Dataset Fine Type T1
GPS Flag NO
Device Product Name NBM-550
Device Serial Number F-0223
Device Cal Due Date 06/10/2022
Probe Product Name EA5091
Probe Serial Number 01182
Probe Cal Due Date 06/12/2022
Probe Field Type E
Probe Connection Type C
Probe Lower Frequency Limit A 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit A 50 GHz
Probe Lower Frequency Limit B 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit B 50 GHz
Probe Emin A 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax A 150.0 V/m
Probe Emin B 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax B 150.0 V/m
Shaped Probe YES
Standard ID 1
Standard Name FCC96-326,occ
Apply Standard OFF
Frequency 300 MHz
Apply Correction Frequency OFF
Eref_E(f) 1.000 V/m
Eref_H(f) 1.000 V/m
Combi Probe Use E_H
Unit mW/cm²
Results Format FIXED
Auto-Zero Interval 15 min
Result Type -
Averaging Time -
Average Progress -
Spatial AVG Mode -
Store Condition -
Storing Range -
Cond. Stop Time -
Upper Threshold -
Lower Threshold -
Timer Interval 60 sec
Timer Duration 00:30:00
History Time Scale -
Time progress of current segment -

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 10
APPENDIX 2.3 Measurement Data (Location #4)

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:12:54 PM

Instrument / Site
Meter Probe
Model: NBM-550
S/N: F-0223
Model: EA5091
S/N: 01182
Calibration Due Date
06/10/2022
Calibration Due Date
06/12/2022
Site Coordinates
American Tower
Site #: 413837
Site Name: Pagemill Highlands CA

37.365176
-122.159998
Comment
Measurement Location #4
Nearest Property Line
Test Report

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:12:54 PM

Measured Values
Zoomed
Timer: Start Time 04:12:54 PM, Period 0h 30' 0'', Interval 60s Index Date/Time Zero Max (E-Field) Avg (E-Field) Min (E-Field) 1 09/14/2021 04:13:54 PM 0.1547 % STD 0.0340 % STD 0.0000 % STD 2 09/14/2021 04:14:54 PM 0.1215 % STD 0.0258 % STD 0.0000 % STD 3 09/14/2021 04:15:54 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0172 % STD 0.0000 % STD 4 09/14/2021 04:16:54 PM 0.1547 % STD 0.0220 % STD 0.0000 % STD 5 09/14/2021 04:17:54 PM 0.0663 % STD 0.0034 % STD 0.0000 % STD 6 09/14/2021 04:18:54 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0098 % STD 0.0000 % STD 7 09/14/2021 04:19:54 PM 0.1160 % STD 0.0215 % STD 0.0000 % STD 8 09/14/2021 04:20:54 PM 0.1381 % STD 0.0167 % STD 0.0000 % STD 9 09/14/2021 04:21:54 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0180 % STD 0.0000 % STD 10 09/14/2021 04:22:54 PM 0.0994 % STD 0.0154 % STD 0.0000 % STD 11 09/14/2021 04:23:54 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0115 % STD 0.0000 % STD 12 09/14/2021 04:24:54 PM 0.0884 % STD 0.0153 % STD 0.0000 % STD 13 09/14/2021 04:25:54 PM 0.0773 % STD 0.0102 % STD 0.0000 % STD 14 09/14/2021 04:26:54 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0078 % STD 0.0000 % STD 15 09/14/2021 04:27:54 PM ! 0.0994 % STD 0.0175 % STD 0.0000 % STD 16 09/14/2021 04:28:54 PM 0.0994 % STD 0.0205 % STD 0.0000 % STD 17 09/14/2021 04:29:54 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0254 % STD 0.0000 % STD 18 09/14/2021 04:30:54 PM 0.1105 % STD 0.0318 % STD 0.0000 % STD 19 09/14/2021 04:31:54 PM 0.1326 % STD 0.0426 % STD 0.0000 % STD 20 09/14/2021 04:32:54 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0137 % STD 0.0000 % STD 21 09/14/2021 04:33:54 PM 0.0994 % STD 0.0175 % STD 0.0000 % STD 22 09/14/2021 04:34:54 PM 0.1602 % STD 0.0166 % STD 0.0000 % STD 23 09/14/2021 04:35:54 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0055 % STD 0.0000 % STD 24 09/14/2021 04:36:54 PM 0.1050 % STD 0.0314 % STD 0.0000 % STD 25 09/14/2021 04:37:54 PM 0.0939 % STD 0.0218 % STD 0.0000 % STD 26 09/14/2021 04:38:54 PM 0.0994 % STD 0.0226 % STD 0.0000 % STD 27 09/14/2021 04:39:54 PM 0.0829 % STD 0.0057 % STD 0.0000 % STD 28 09/14/2021 04:40:54 PM 0.0387 % STD 0.0017 % STD 0.0000 % STD 29 09/14/2021 04:41:54 PM 0.1768 % STD 0.0074 % STD 0.0000 % STD 30 09/14/2021 04:42:54 PM ! 0.1381 % STD 0.0361 % STD 0.0000 % STD

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:12:54 PM

Graph

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:12:54 PM

Images

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:12:54 PM

Parameters
Operating Mode HIGH FREQUENCY
Number of Sub-Indices 30
Storing Date 09/14/2021
Storing Time 04:12:54 PM
Dataset Type TIM
Voice Comment Available NO
Dataset Fine Type T1
GPS Flag NO
Device Product Name NBM-550
Device Serial Number F-0223
Device Cal Due Date 06/10/2022
Probe Product Name EA5091
Probe Serial Number 01182
Probe Cal Due Date 06/12/2022
Probe Field Type E
Probe Connection Type C
Probe Lower Frequency Limit A 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit A 50 GHz
Probe Lower Frequency Limit B 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit B 50 GHz
Probe Emin A 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax A 150.0 V/m
Probe Emin B 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax B 150.0 V/m
Shaped Probe YES
Standard ID 1
Standard Name FCC96-326,occ
Apply Standard OFF
Frequency 300 MHz
Apply Correction Frequency OFF
Eref_E(f) 1.000 V/m
Eref_H(f) 1.000 V/m
Combi Probe Use E_H
Unit mW/cm²
Results Format FIXED
Auto-Zero Interval 15 min
Result Type -
Averaging Time -
Average Progress -
Spatial AVG Mode -
Store Condition -
Storing Range -
Cond. Stop Time -
Upper Threshold -
Lower Threshold -
Timer Interval 60 sec
Timer Duration 00:30:00
History Time Scale -
Time progress of current segment -

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 11
APPENDIX 2.4 Measurement Data (Location #5)

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:49:41 PM

Instrument / Site
Meter Probe
Model: NBM-550
S/N: F-0223
Model: EA5091
S/N: 01182
Calibration Due Date
06/10/2022
Calibration Due Date
06/12/2022
Site Coordinates
American Tower
Site #: 413837
Site Name: Pagemill Highlands CA

37.365101
-12.159657
Comment
Measurement Location #5
100' Mark From Tower
Test Report

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:49:41 PM

Measured Values
Zoomed
Timer: Start Time 04:49:41 PM, Period 0h 30' 0'', Interval 60s Index Date/Time Zero Max (E-Field) Avg (E-Field) Min (E-Field) 1 09/14/2021 04:50:41 PM 0.2310 % STD 0.0699 % STD 0.0000 % STD 2 09/14/2021 04:51:41 PM 0.1363 % STD 0.0483 % STD 0.0000 % STD 3 09/14/2021 04:52:41 PM 0.1896 % STD 0.0848 % STD 0.0000 % STD 4 09/14/2021 04:53:41 PM 0.2429 % STD 0.1335 % STD 0.0296 % STD 5 09/14/2021 04:54:41 PM 0.1718 % STD 0.0598 % STD 0.0000 % STD 6 09/14/2021 04:55:41 PM 0.1512 % STD 0.0355 % STD 0.0000 % STD 7 09/14/2021 04:56:41 PM 0.1785 % STD 0.0785 % STD 0.0000 % STD 8 09/14/2021 04:57:41 PM 0.2783 % STD 0.1065 % STD 0.0000 % STD 9 09/14/2021 04:58:41 PM 0.2968 % STD 0.1732 % STD 0.0474 % STD 10 09/14/2021 04:59:41 PM 0.4390 % STD 0.2596 % STD 0.1185 % STD 11 09/14/2021 05:00:41 PM 0.6491 % STD 0.4232 % STD 0.2251 % STD 12 09/14/2021 05:01:41 PM 0.5814 % STD 0.4398 % STD 0.2955 % STD 13 09/14/2021 05:02:41 PM 0.5793 % STD 0.4280 % STD 0.2902 % STD 14 09/14/2021 05:03:41 PM ! 0.6162 % STD 0.4717 % STD 0.3318 % STD 15 09/14/2021 05:04:41 PM 0.7159 % STD 0.5545 % STD 0.3968 % STD 16 09/14/2021 05:05:41 PM 0.8029 % STD 0.6153 % STD 0.4263 % STD 17 09/14/2021 05:06:41 PM 0.8231 % STD 0.7070 % STD 0.6043 % STD 18 09/14/2021 05:07:41 PM 0.8692 % STD 0.7288 % STD 0.5923 % STD 19 09/14/2021 05:08:41 PM 0.7623 % STD 0.6477 % STD 0.5096 % STD 20 09/14/2021 05:09:41 PM 0.8661 % STD 0.6774 % STD 0.5090 % STD 21 09/14/2021 05:10:41 PM 0.7676 % STD 0.6221 % STD 0.4966 % STD 22 09/14/2021 05:11:41 PM 0.7085 % STD 0.5889 % STD 0.4385 % STD 23 09/14/2021 05:12:41 PM 0.8287 % STD 0.6337 % STD 0.4740 % STD 24 09/14/2021 05:13:41 PM 0.7822 % STD 0.6508 % STD 0.5154 % STD 25 09/14/2021 05:14:41 PM 0.8194 % STD 0.6635 % STD 0.5154 % STD 26 09/14/2021 05:15:41 PM 0.7281 % STD 0.5966 % STD 0.4655 % STD 27 09/14/2021 05:16:41 PM 0.7287 % STD 0.5743 % STD 0.4562 % STD 28 09/14/2021 05:17:41 PM 0.7003 % STD 0.5843 % STD 0.4377 % STD 29 09/14/2021 05:18:41 PM ! 0.7788 % STD 0.6553 % STD 0.4621 % STD 30 09/14/2021 05:19:41 PM 0.7714 % STD 0.6246 % STD 0.4857 % STD

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:49:41 PM

Graph

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:49:41 PM

Images

Date 09/14/2021
Time 04:49:41 PM

Parameters
Operating Mode HIGH FREQUENCY
Number of Sub-Indices 30
Storing Date 09/14/2021
Storing Time 04:49:41 PM
Dataset Type TIM
Voice Comment Available NO
Dataset Fine Type T1
GPS Flag NO
Device Product Name NBM-550
Device Serial Number F-0223
Device Cal Due Date 06/10/2022
Probe Product Name EA5091
Probe Serial Number 01182
Probe Cal Due Date 06/12/2022
Probe Field Type E
Probe Connection Type C
Probe Lower Frequency Limit A 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit A 50 GHz
Probe Lower Frequency Limit B 300 kHz
Probe Upper Frequency Limit B 50 GHz
Probe Emin A 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax A 150.0 V/m
Probe Emin B 4.340 V/m
Probe Emax B 150.0 V/m
Shaped Probe YES
Standard ID 1
Standard Name FCC96-326,occ
Apply Standard OFF
Frequency 300 MHz
Apply Correction Frequency OFF
Eref_E(f) 1.000 V/m
Eref_H(f) 1.000 V/m
Combi Probe Use E_H
Unit mW/cm²
Results Format FIXED
Auto-Zero Interval 15 min
Result Type -
Averaging Time -
Average Progress -
Spatial AVG Mode -
Store Condition -
Storing Range -
Cond. Stop Time -
Upper Threshold -
Lower Threshold -
Timer Interval 60 sec
Timer Duration 00:30:00
History Time Scale -
Time progress of current segment -

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 12
APPENDIX 3 Measurement Level Tables
4 Closest Propety Line 0.0088 0.1768 0.8840
5 100' Mark From Tower 0.0435 0.8692 4.3460
2 Closest Building 0.0086 0.1713 0.8565
3 50' From Tower Mark 0.0069 0.1381 0.6905
American Tower Site: 413837 Pagemill Highlands CA
Measurement Location Maximum MPE Levels

MEASUREMENT LOCATION
#
Power Density
(Max.) (mW/cm2)
Occupational
(%) MPE
General Population
(%) MPE
1 Equipment Pad 0.0130 0.2607 1.3035
American Tower Site: 413837 Pagemill Highlands CA
Measurement Location Average MPE Levels

MEASUREMENT LOCATION
#
Power Density
(Avg.) (mW/cm2)
Occupational
(%) MPE
General Population
(%) MPE
1 Equipment Pad 0.0074 0.1480 0.7400
2 Closest Building 0.0037 0.0731 0.3655
3 50' From Tower Mark 0.0021 0.0422 0.2110
4 Closest Propety Line 0.0004 0.0074 0.0370
5 100' Mark From Tower 0.0364 0.7288 3.6440
American Tower Site: 413837 Pagemill Highlands CA
Measurement Location Minimum MPE Levels

MEASUREMENT LOCATION
#
Power Density
(Min.) (mW/cm2)
Occupational
(%) MPE
General Population
(%) MPE
1 Equipment Pad 0.0041 0.0829 0.4145
2 Closest Building 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3 50' From Tower Mark 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
4 Closest Propety Line 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5 100' Mark From Tower 0.0296 0.5923 2.9615 Page 277 of 551 RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 13
APPENDIX 4 Predicted Diminishing RF Levels
(+
Distance From Tower
(Horizontal) (ft)
Distance From Tower
(Slant) (ft)
Power Density
(mV/cm²)
%MPE
(Occupational)
%MPE
(General Population)
10 64.78 0.0274 0.6028 3.0140
20 67.05 0.0293 0.6432 3.2160
30 70.68 0.0262 0.5754 2.8770
40 75.47 0.0301 0.6610 3.3050
50 81.22 0.0135 0.2977 1.4885
60 87.73 0.0236 0.5180 2.5900
70 94.85 0.0183 0.4022 2.0110
80 102.45 0.0188 0.4127 2.0635
90 110.44 0.0378 0.8298 4.1490
100 118.73 0.0392 0.8607 4.3035
110 127.26 0.0283 0.6216 3.1080
120 136.00 0.0220 0.4842 2.4210
130 144.90 0.0137 0.3015 1.5075
140 153.94 0.0082 0.1803 0.9015
150 163.08 0.0022 0.0474 0.2370
160 172.33 0.0022 0.0475 0.2375
170 181.65 0.0032 0.0710 0.3550
180 191.04 0.0038 0.0826 0.4130
190 200.49 0.0036 0.0785 0.3925
200 209.99 0.0050 0.1107 0.5535
Pagemill Highlands CA Diminshing RF Levels

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 14
APPENDIX 5 Diminishing RF Level Study Area

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 15
APPENDIX 6.0 Site Photographs
Site ID Sign

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 16
APPENDIX 6.1 Site Photographs
Tower View

RF Design & Services |Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (www.tepgroup.net) 105 W Caswell Street | Kinston, NC 28501 17
APPENDIX 6.2 Site Photographs
Equipment Pad Entrance

VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP SITE NAME: PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA SITE NUMBER: 413837 SITE ADDRESS: 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 DATE DRAWN: SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:

Copyright © 2016 ATC IP LLC, All Rights Reserved. 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 07/15/21 13710601_E1 G-001 SEAL: REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE ATC SITE NUMBER: ATC SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: ATC JOB NO: ATC TOWER SERVICES, LLC 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 PHONE: (919) 468-0112 THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER. THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER. TITLE SHEET 0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JM 07/15/21 1 ADDED TOWER ELEV AV 09/09/21 2 ADDED EQUIP. SCHEDULE TA 10/29/21 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL SHEET INDEX SHEET NO: DESCRIPTION: REV: DATE: BY: G-001 TITLE SHEET 2 10/29/21 TA V-101 AS-BUILT TOWER SURVEY V-102 AS-BUILT TOWER SURVEY V-103 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY PLAN C-101 OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 07/15/21 JM C-102 DETAILED SITE PLAN 0 07/15/21 JM C-103 TOWER ELEVATION 2 10/29/21 TA C-104 TOWER ELEVATION 2 10/29/21 TA C-501 SIGNAGE 0 07/15/21 JM Know what's below. Call before you dig. R 1. THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED. 2. A TECHNICIAN WILL VISIT THE SITE APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR ROUTINE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE. 3. EXISTING FACILITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL FAA AND FCC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 4. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT LAND DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT OF STORM WATER DRAINAGE. 5. NO SANITARY SEWER, POTABLE WATER OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED. 6. HANDICAP ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED. 7. THE PROJECT DEPICTED IN THESE PLANS QUALIFIES AS AN ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST ENTITLED TO EXPEDITED REVIEW UNDER 47 U.S.C. § 1455(A) AS A MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING WIRELESS TOWER THAT INVOLVES THE COLLOCATION, REMOVAL, AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT THAT IS NOT A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE UNDER CFR § 1.61000 (B)(7). AMERICAN TOWER, LLC. 10 PRESIDENTIAL WAY WOBURN, MA 01801 TOWER OWNER: PROPERTY OWNER: ATC TOWER SERVICES 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 ENGINEER: COMPLIANCE CODE PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NOTES PROJECT TEAM PROJECT LOCATION DIRECTIONS UTILITY COMPANIES THIS SUBMITTAL IS FOR RE-PERMITTING WITH THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY. THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS INTENDED TO DEPICT EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. NO CHANGES TO EXISTING ARE PROPOSED. JURISDICTION: TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS PARCEL NUMBER: 182-28-039 ZONING: UNKNOWN ZONING INFORMATION: AGENT: GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 37.364786 LONGITUDE: -122.159689 GROUND ELEVATION: 694' AMSL SITE ADDRESS: 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 COUNTY: SANTA CLARA FROM I-280 NORTH, TAKE THE EL MONTE RD EXIT, EXIT 16, TOWARD MOODY RD.KEEP LEFT TO TAKE THE EL MONTE W RAMP. MERGE ONTO EL MONTE RD.TURN SLIGHT LEFT ONTO MOODY RD.TURN SLIGHT RIGHT ONTO ALTAMONT RD. (0.7 MI) TURN RIGHT TO STAY ON ALTAMONT RD.ALTAMONT RD IS 0.2 MILES PAST CORBETTA LN. IF YOU REACH THE END OF JULIETTA LN YOU'VE GONE ABOUT 0.2 MILES TOO FAR. 27278 ALTAMONT RD IS ON THE LEFT. POWER COMPANY: UNKNOWN PHONE: N/A TELEPHONE COMPANY: AT&T PHONE: (800) 331-0500 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 BONNIE BELAIR ATTORNEY, AMERICAN TOWER 10 PRESIDENTIAL WAY WOBURN, MA 01801 ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. 1. 2019 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 2. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 3. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTAL CODE 4. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 5. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 6. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE 7. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE 8. 2019 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE 9. 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 10. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) 11. LOCAL BUILDING CODE 12. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES ALTAMONT RD SITE LOCATION

SURVEY LEGEND X X DATE DRAWN: SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:

Copyright © 2016 ATC IP LLC, All Rights Reserved. 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 07/15/21 13710601_E1 C-101 SEAL: REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE ATC SITE NUMBER: ATC SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: ATC JOB NO: ATC TOWER SERVICES, LLC 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 PHONE: (919) 468-0112 THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER. THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER. OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JM 07/15/21 0 0 200' 400' SCALE: 1"=200' (11X17) 1"=100' (22X34) 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS INTENDED TO DEPICT EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ONLY. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY PROPOSED WORK. 2. FIELD SURVEY DATE: 10/07/2016 3. BOUNDARY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM: DATATREE ONLINE GIS

X X X DATE DRAWN: SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:

Copyright © 2016 ATC IP LLC, All Rights Reserved. 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 07/15/21 13710601_E1 C-102 SEAL: REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE ATC SITE NUMBER: ATC SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: ATC JOB NO: ATC TOWER SERVICES, LLC 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 PHONE: (919) 468-0112 THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER. THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER. DETAILED SITE PLAN 0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JM 07/15/21
0 0 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=10' (11X17) 1"=5' (22X34) 1 DETAILED SITE PLAN

DATE DRAWN: SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:

Copyright © 2016 ATC IP LLC, All Rights Reserved. 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 07/15/21 13710601_E1 C-103 SEAL: REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE ATC SITE NUMBER: ATC SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: ATC JOB NO: ATC TOWER SERVICES, LLC 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 PHONE: (919) 468-0112 THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER. THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER. TOWER ELEVATION 0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JM 07/15/21 1 ADDED TOWER ELEV AV 09/09/21 2 ADDED EQUIP. SCHEDULE TA 10/29/21 2 1 TOWER ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MONOPINE NOTES: MONOPINE BRANCHES ARE SHOWN FOR VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY AND DO NOT DEPICT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. 2 TOWER ELEVATION (LOOKING SOUTH) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MONOPINE NOTES: MONOPINE BRANCHES ARE SHOWN FOR VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY AND DO NOT DEPICT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

DATE DRAWN: SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:

Copyright © 2016 ATC IP LLC, All Rights Reserved. 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 07/15/21 13710601_E1 C-104 SEAL: REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE ATC SITE NUMBER: ATC SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: ATC JOB NO: ATC TOWER SERVICES, LLC 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 PHONE: (919) 468-0112 THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER. THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER. TOWER ELEVATION 0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JM 07/15/21 1 ADDED TOWER ELEV AV 09/09/21 2 ADDED EQUIP. SCHEDULE TA 10/29/21 2 1 TOWER ELEVATION (LOOKING EAST) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MONOPINE NOTES: MONOPINE BRANCHES ARE SHOWN FOR VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY AND DO NOT DEPICT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. 2 TOWER ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST) SCALE: NOT TO SCALE MONOPINE NOTES: MONOPINE BRANCHES ARE SHOWN FOR VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY AND DO NOT DEPICT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

DATE DRAWN: SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:

Copyright © 2016 ATC IP LLC, All Rights Reserved. 413837 PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 27210 ALTAMONT RD. LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 07/15/21 13710601_E1 C-501 SEAL: REV. DESCRIPTION BY DATE ATC SITE NUMBER: ATC SITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: ATC JOB NO: ATC TOWER SERVICES, LLC 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27518 PHONE: (919) 468-0112 THESE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATION AS INSTRUMENTS OR SERVICE ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER. THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY ARE PREPARED. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AMERICAN TOWER OR THE SPECIFIED CARRIER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF AMERICAN TOWER WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT IS EXECUTED. NEITHER THE ARCHITECT NOR THE ENGINEER WILL BE PROVIDING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE AMERICAN TOWER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY PRIOR ISSUANCE OF THIS DRAWING IS SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST VERSION ON FILE WITH AMERICAN TOWER. SIGNAGE 0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JM 07/15/21 0 REPLACEMENT OF SIGNAGE: AS SIGNAGE BECOMES STOLEN, DAMAGED, BRITTLE OR FADED, IT SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH SIGNAGE PER THIS SPECIFICATION. ANY ACQUIRED SITE SHOULD HAVE NEW SIGNS POSTED WITHIN 60 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ANY SITE SOLD SHOULD HAVE THE ATC SIGNS REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL FCC OR REGULATORY SIGNAGE MUST BE INSTALLED OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED TO MEET OUR STANDARD. SIGNS SHOULD BE REPLACED ON NORMAL, QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE VISITS BY CONTRACTORS OR SITE MANAGERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS. NOTE: EXTERIOR SIGNS ARE NOT PROPOSED EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY THE FCC. ALL EXISTING SIGNAGE AND ANY FUTURE SIGNAGE WILL BE COMPLIANT WITH STATUTE 164-43.4 NO HIGH-VOLTAGE SIGNAGE IS NECESSARY. NO HIGH-VOLTAGE EQUIPMENT PRESENT. THERE MUST BE AN ATC SIGN WITH SITE INFORMATION AND FCC REGISTRATION NUMBER AT BOTH THE ACCESS ROAD GATE (GATE OFF OF MAIN ROAD, IF APPLICABLE) AND COMPOUND FENCE (IF NO COMPOUND FENCE, THEN IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE UPON DRIVE UP). IN ADDITION, PLEASE LOOK AT DIAGRAM FOR ALL ADDITIONAL SIGNS REQUIRED. OPTION 1 MAY BE USED TO POST TOWER REGISTRATION NUMBERS AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER IF A WARNING SIGN DOES NOT HAVE SPACE FOR THE TOWER REGISTRATION NUMBER. IMPORTANT: FOR ANY ATC SIGN THAT DOES NOT MEET THE ATC SPECIFICATION FOR SIGNAGE (I.E., SHARPIE/PAINT PEN, WORN LABELS, ETC.), BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE (RE-WRITE IF WORN) AND FLAG FOR REPLACEMENT ASAP WITH THE APPROPRIATE PERMANENT SIGN (YOU CAN ORDER THESE THROUGH THE WAREHOUSE). ONLY LABELS PRINTED BY A ZEBRA LABEL PRINTER WILL BE ACCEPTED. ATC CAUTION AND NO TRESPASSING SIGN ATC RF WARNING AND FCC NUMBER SIGN ATC STAND-ALONE FCC TOWER REGISTRATION SIGN ATC RF PROGRAM NOTICE SIGN ATC SITE SIGN A "NO TRESPASSING" SIGN MUST BE POSTED A MINIMUM OF EVERY 50'. EXISTING SIGNAGE PHOTO PAGEMILL HIGHLANDS CA 413837 NOT REQUIRED CAUTION NO. TREP CAUTION NO. TREP CAUTION NO. TREP CAUTION NO. TREP WARNING 1212534 WARNING FCC TOWER REG# OPTION 1 RF PROGRAM/ GUIDELINES (SOLID YELLOW) INCLUDES SITE NUMBER AND FCC NUMBER TOWER NOT REQUIRED

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS March 17, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: REVIEW THE 2021 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT AND 2021 HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT AND

AUTHORIZE TRANSMITTAL OF THE REPORTS TO THE OFFICE OF THE

PLANNING AND RESEARCH AND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, RESPECTIVELY, BY APRIL 1, 2022
FROM: Areli Perez, Assistant Planner
Steve Padovan, Principal Planner
Sofia Mangalam, Planning Director
APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Review the 2021 General Plan Annual Progress Report (Attachment 1) and 2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Attachments 2 and 3); and

2. Authorize transmittal of the reports to the Office of Planning and Research and Department of Housing and Community Development, respectively, by April 1, 2022.

BACKGROUND
Government Code Section 65400 mandates that all cities and counties submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation to their legislative bodies (City Council), the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 1 of each year. The APR provides local legislative bodies and the public with information regarding the implementation of the General Plan for their jurisdiction. APRs also inform the public of the progress in meeting the community’s goals. This year’s APR evaluates the status of the implementation programs and housing production for the time period between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021.

DISCUSSION
The intent of the General Plan Annual Report is to demonstrate the Town’s compliance with the requirements of Government Code Sections 65400 which mandates that the County prepare an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation.

General Plan Annual Progress Report
All cities in California are required to prepare and adopt a General Plan. The General Plan identifies policies and programs addressing the development and redevelopment of land, preservation of parks and open spaces, provision of housing for current and future residents, conservation of natural resources, improvement of the circulation and transportation system, control of noise and protection of life and property from hazards.

AGENDA ITEM #10.D

City Council Page 2
2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
March 17, 2022
The General Plan must contain seven (7) state-mandated elements. It may also contain any other elements that the legislative body of the county or city wishes to adopt. The seven (7) mandated elements are: Land Use, Open Space, Conservation, Housing, Circulation, Noise, and Safety.

The table 1 below shows the State-mandate elements and their counterparts in the Los Altos Hills General Plan.

Table 1
State-Mandated Elements Corresponding Los Altos Hills
General Plan Elements
Last Updated
Land Use Land Use 2008
Circulation Circulation and Scenic Roadway 2015
Housing Housing 2015
Open Space Open Space and Reservation 2007
Conservation Conservation 2007
Safety Safety 2007
Noise Noise 2007
Pathway 2019
APRs must be presented to the local legislative body for its review and acceptance, usually as a consent or discussion item on a regular meeting agenda. The APR should provide enough information for decision makers to assess how the General Plan was implemented during the 12- month reporting period. More specifically, APRs should explain how land use decisions relate to adopted goals, policies, and implementation measures of the General Plan. As discussed above, the APR is due to HCD by April 1 of each year. This year’s APR evaluates the status of the implementation programs and housing production for the time period between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021.

The Planning Department staff worked with other Town departments in assessing the programs of the different Elements of the General Plan and prepared the General Plan APR. Attachment 1 includes measures associated with the implementation of the general plan with specific reference to individual elements in the General Plan.

Housing Element Annual Progress Report
State law requires that all General Plans include a Housing Element which provides a plan for accommodating future housing production needs. State law further requires that all cities and counties create an annual progress report that describes that community’s progress toward implementing their Housing Element. The Housing Element APR must be delivered to OPR and HCD by April 1 of each year and must cover the previous calendar year.

The Housing Element APR fulfills statutory requirements to report certain housing information, including: the local agency’s progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs (i.e., applications, entitlements, permits and certificates of occupancy), certain rezoning activities, actions taken towards completion of housing element programs, and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the development of housing (Government Codes Section 65584.3(c)

City Council Page 3
2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
March 17, 2022
and 65584.5(b)(5)). California’s housing element law acknowledges that in order for the private market to adequately address the state’s housing needs, local governments must adopt plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development. As a result, housing policy rests largely on the effective implementation of local general plans and housing elements.

Existing Land Use Conditions
The Town of Los Altos Hills consists of very low-density residential land uses along with supporting institutional uses (religious and educational facilities). All development is encompassed within one (1) zoning district, Residential-Agricultural (R-A), which permits the following types of housing:
 single-family residences;
 accessory dwelling units;
 residential care facilities for six (6) persons or less;  transitional and supportive housing for six (6) persons or less;  emergency shelters with up to five (5) beds.

The current Housing Element includes various programs designed to increase housing opportunities for the residents and meet the Town’s state mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) numbers for Very-Low, Low, and Moderate income households. It should be noted that all new primary residences are designated as Above-Moderate income households.

The primary method through which the Town meets its affordable housing goals for new housing units is through the development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Due to changes in State law, ADUs are now permitted on all properties (no minimum lot size or requirement that the property be owner occupied), may be up to 1,200 square feet in total living area, may utilize tandem parking or parking within the yard setbacks, and shall be approved though a ministerial process if the project meets all objective criteria in the Town’s ADU regulations. State law also allows for junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) of up to 500 square feet in size on all properties through the conversion of existing floor area within a primary single-family residence. In addition, the City Council has reduced or eliminated sewer and pathways fees for new ADUs and existing unpermitted ADUs can be legalized administratively through a building permit process.

Summary of New Residential Development in 2021
In 2021, the Town issued 62 building permits for 21 primary residences and 41 ADUs. Of the 21 new primary dwellings, 16 were replacement structures. Therefore, only 5 new residences are counted as net new housing units towards meeting the Town’s overall RHNA goals. However, all 41 ADUs are new units and count towards meeting the Town’s affordable RHNA goals.

Progress to Date on Meeting the RHNA Numbers
In the previous Housing Element planning cycle (2007-2014), the Town exceeded its overall goal by six units (81 units required – 87 units constructed) and the Town was successful in closely meeting the Extremely-Low and Very-Low income categories (27 required – 25 constructed). The overall RHNA number for the 2015-2023 planning cycle increased to 121 net new housing units

City Council Page 4
2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
March 17, 2022
for all household incomes. The 121-unit requirement is further broken down into four income categories: 46 Very-Low, 28 Low, 32 Moderate, and 15 Above-Moderate.

A summary of housing permits from the Housing Element Annual Progress Report (seen in Table 2) shows the number of units constructed annually in each income category for the first seven (7) years of the eight-year RHNA planning period.

In the years 2015-2020, the Town determined the affordability of new ADUs based on 2014 survey which included the following parameters for ADU affordability, including 60% of the ADUs are occupied by Very-Low income households, 25% are Low income, and 15% are Moderate income.

However, for the year 2021, staff calculated ADU affordability based on draft ABAG Housing Technical Assistance Team’s Affordability of Accessory Dwelling Units document dated September 08, 2021. The draft report recommends ADU affordability as follows: 30% Very low income, 30% Low income, 30% Moderate income, and 10% Above moderate.

Table 2: Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Building Permits Issued by Affordability
Calendar Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Units
to
Date
(all
years)
Total
Remaining
RHNA by
Income
Levels
Income Level
RHNA
by
Income
Level
Year
1 Year
2 Year
3 Year
4 Year
5 Year
6 Year
7 Very-Low
Deed
Restricted 46
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 Non-deed
Restricted 5 4 5 3 5 15 12 49
Low
Deed
Restricted 28
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 Non-deed
Restricted 2 3 2 1 2 6 12 28
Moderate
Deed
Restricted 32
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Non-deed
Restricted 2 1 2 1 1 4 13 24
Above-Moderate 15 8 11 4 8 8 4 9 52 0
Total RHNA by COG 121
17 19 13 13 16 29 46 153
8 Total Units ► ►
Remaining Need for RHNA Period ► ► ► ► ►

City Council Page 5
2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
March 17, 2022
At the end of year seven of the eight-year Housing Element cycle (2015-2023), the Town met its overall RHNA allocation (152 net new units vs. 121 required), however, the Town still need to meet its obligation for moderate housing units.

SB 35 Determination
Legislation, such as Senate Bill 35 (SB 35), Assembly Bill 73 (AB 73), and Senate Bill 570 (SB 570) adopted in 2017, has provided penalties and incentives related to making progress toward meeting RHNA for the 2015-2023 Planning Period. HCD released a report on July 18, 2021, the SB 35 Statewide Determination Summary, showing that Los Altos Hills is amongst 225 jurisdiction that have made insufficient progress toward their Lower income RHNA (Very Low and Low income) and are therefore subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 50% affordability. However, this will change based on 2021 APR as the Town was able to produce ADUs that are able to satisfy very-low and low income RHNA allocation for the 5th cycle.

Housing Element Program Implementation
In order to increase the number of affordable units built in the Town, the Housing Element includes programs that are intended to provide incentives to property owners to legalize and construct ADUs and provide employee housing for institutional uses. The new state laws on ADUs that went into effect on January 1, 2020 and the Town’s adopted ADU ordinance address most if not all of the existing programs in the Housing Element focused on ADUs and the recent surge in new ADU permits confirms that the changes have increased ADU production. In addition to the completion of most of the programs related to ADUs, the Town has several adopted programs that focus on the affordability of new units which are as follows:

22. Program At least once at the beginning and once at the end of the eight-year timeframe of the Housing Element, conduct Town-wide surveys to ascertain information on rental rates of rooms and second units, occupancy status, structural condition of unit or room.

Time Frame: 2014, 2022
Responsible Agency: Planning Department
Quantified Objective: N/A
Completed. The Town completed an ADU Survey in 2021. The ADU survey concluded that no rent is charged on 46% of the ADUs and that 80% of the units charge rent of $2,400 or less. The survey also found that retirees made up 22% of the households and that a large majority of the units (approximately 75%) were studios and one-bedroom dwellings which are rented at affordable rates.

23. Program Maintain an inventory of second units and provide monthly and yearly updates on the construction of second units. At mid-point in the timeframe of the Housing Element, the Town will compare the results of the tracking system with its regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) for extremely low, very low, low and moderate-income families. If RHNA is not being met, the City will develop alternative

City Council Page 6
2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
March 17, 2022
strategies for addressing the housing needs of very low, low, and moderate-income families.

Time Frame: Annual/Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Building and Planning Departments
Quantified Objective: N/A
Ongoing. Yearly updates are done through the Annual Progress Report (APR) and through Monthly Building Permit reports that are included with the City Manager’s Report. The Town also maintains a digital list of ADUs using the TRAKiT database software. Based on the data collected, the Town is successfully meeting the housing needs of very low, low, and moderate income households and has currently exceeded the RHNA of 121 total units for the Housing Element 5th cycle.

33. Program Continue to provide financial support to the Community Services Agency and the Los Altos Senior Center for the provision of such services as emergency assistance, nutrition and hot meal programs, information and referral, and senior care management.

Time Frame: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: City Council/City Manager
Quantified Objective: Annual contributions
Ongoing. The Town continues to provide financial support for the local Community Services Agency (CSA) which provides food and services to low income and homeless individuals and the Community Health Awareness Council (CHAC) which provides affordable mental health care for homeless individuals and seniors. The amount provided has increased from $10,000 to over $100,000 in the 21-22 budget.

NOTICING/PUBLIC OUTREACH
The public was advised of this Public Hearing in the following ways:
 Notice in the Los Altos Town Crier – March 4, 2022
 Public Posting Places – March 4, 2022
 Town Website: www.losaltoshills.ca.gov – March 11, 2022 To date, staff has not received a public comment regarding the proposed project. 2022 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This action is consistent with the value/priority area “Maintain Quality of Life and Community Character” of the City Council Strategic Priorities Implementation Plan. Update Housing Element is identified as a key project/initiative under 2022 City Council Priorities Implementation Plan, and this APR aligns with the key outcome of complying with the State Law.

City Council Page 7
2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report
March 17, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
The administration, implementation and annal reporting on the Housing Element is not a recoverable cost and is covered by the General Fund support of the Planning Department.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Annual Progress Report is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15306 (Information Collection) as it was limited to basic data collection strictly for information gathering purposes, which does not result in a serious major disturbance to an environmental resource.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: General Plan Annual Progress Report for 2021 Attachment 2: Tables A, A2 & B – Housing Element Annual Progress Report 2021 Attachment 3: Table D – Housing Element Program Implementation Status 2021

1 2021 General Plan Annual Progress Report
Town of Los Altos Hills

2 Table of Contents

1. Introduction 3
General Plan Elements

2. General Plan Implementation (excluding Housing Element) 4

3. Additional Content 22

3 1. Introduction
General Plan Elements State law requires all cities and counties in California to adopt a General Plan, comprised at minimum of seven mandated “Elements,” that addresses physical development within its jurisdiction.

The table below shows the State-mandate elements and their counterparts in the Los Altos Hills General Plan.

State-Mandated Elements Corresponding Los Altos Hills
General Plan Elements
Last Updated
Land Use Land Use 2008
Circulation Circulation and Scenic Roadway 2015
Housing Housing 2015
Open Space Open Space and Reservation 2007
Conservation Conservation 2007
Safety Safety 2007
Noise Noise 2007
Pathway 2019

4 2. General Plan Implementation
The Annual Progress Report was presented to the City Council on March 17, 2022.

The Planning Department staff worked with different Town departments in assessing the programs of the different Elements of the General Plan and prepared the General Plan Annual Progress Report.

The table below includes measures associated with the implementation of the General Plan with specific reference to individual elements of the General Plan:

PROGRAM PROGRAM DESCRIPTION STATUS/PROGRESS IN 2021 DEPT

LAND USE
Continue to implement the Town’s Zoning
Ordinance, Site Development Ordinance,
Subdivision Ordinance, and related
policies and procedures. Review and
update these regulations as needed to
ensure that development occurs in a
manner compatible with the Town’s semirural character and its natural environment.

Ongoing Planning

5 2.1 Continue to require the dedication of open
space easements where appropriate as a
condition of approval for new
development. Each parcel shall be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis during
the site development review process to
determine whether an open space
easement should be required, based on
the extent of steep slopes generally in
excess of 30% slope and the presence of
heritage oak trees and/or creek corridors.

Other considerations shall include the size
of the proposed open space easement, its
contiguity with existing open space
easements, and whether the property is
located within an Open Space
Conservation Area.

Continue to record easements over
properties for Site Development
Permits
Planning

2.5 Protect the public safety and minimize the
risk of damage from natural hazards by
requiring site-specific geologic
investigations of proposed building sites.

Geotech reports are required for
properties in hazard zones
Planning/Building/PW

6 3.3 Continue to assist school districts by
requiring the payment of school impact
fees as per Government Code Section
65995 prior to issuance of building
permits.

School fees are required at building
permit issuance
Building

4.1 Prepare, adopt and implement an annual
Capital Improvements Program supporting
policies in the General Plan to maintain,
improve or expand public utilities and
infrastructure.

Annual CIP project list compiled PW/Finance

CIRCULATION

2.3 The 2020/21 Pavement Rehabilitation
Project is completed.

Continue to work on the 2021/22
Pavement Rehabilitation Project to
ensure safety in using Town roads
and improve Pavement Condition
Index (PCI)
PW

4.1 Create and maintain a list of all public and
private roads in Town and update as
changes occur.

Update list on annual basis PW

7 5.1 Driveway standards shall be incorporated
into the Town’s Site Development and
Subdivision codes.

Completed and included in Title 9 of
the Municipal Code
PW/Planning

6.6 The Town shall coordinate with Caltrans
on future bicycle facility improvements to
the I-280/Page Mill Road and I-280/El
Monte Road interchanges.

Bicycle facilities at I-280/Page Mill
Road completed
PW/County

7.5 Encourage pedestrian facilities to reflect
the semi-rural character of the Town, with
an emphasis on pathways separated from
the roadways rather than integrated curbs
and sidewalks.

All road-side pathways constructed
within Town limits are separated
from the road if possible
PW

8.7 Identify sections of collector and arterial
roads that are narrow and could be
improved to provide safer pedestrian,
bicycling and equestrian passage.

E. Sunset Drive was evaluated, and
construction contract issued for road
widening.

PW

10.2 The Fire Department shall review new
development proposals to assure
adequate emergency access is provided.

All the permits are reviewed by
County Fire Department
Planning/Building/County
Fire

11.2 Identify problem areas and earmark such
areas for storm drain improvements in the
Ongoing PW

8 Town’s annual Capital Improvement
Project Budget.

13.5 Work with State (Caltrans) and County
officials on future improvements to Page
Mill Expressway and the I-280/Page Mill
Expressway/Arastradero Road
interchange to ensure that the
improvements are compatible with the
rural character of the community and
improve safety for motorists, pedestrians,
bicycles, and equestrians.

County has completed
improvements to Foothill Expwy at
Edith Road and Burke Road
interchanges
PW/County

13.7 Work with the Midpeninsula Regional
Open Space District to locate parking
facilities on District lands and to minimize
the impact on residents of parking for and
access to District open space preserves.

Planning staff met and discussed
parking facilities at District land and
provided input/suggestions optional
parking and alternate transportation
to parking facilities
Planning

CONSERVATION

1.1 Continue to require that structures be set
back at least 25 feet from the top of creek
banks. To ensure adequate protection of
Ongoing. Every new development
reviewed by Town requires 25-foot
setback from top of creek banks.

Planning

9 these valuable resources, review the 25-
foot setback and consider expanding it to
the driplines of mature oak trees within the
setback.

1.2 Continue to require open space
easements along creeks and riparian
corridors to ensure that these areas
remain in their natural condition.

Every new development reviewed
by Town requires an open space
easement to be dedicated
Planning

2.1 Continue to enforce the Heritage Tree
Ordinance, which protects large oak trees
and other significant trees by requiring a
special permit for removal.

Reviewed during planning
entitlements
Planning

2.2 Continue to require the replacement of any
Heritage Oaks or other significant trees
that are removed under special permit or
as part of approved development projects.

Reviewed during planning
entitlements
Planning

2.4 Continue to refer site development
applications to the Environmental Design
Committee and Open Space Committee
for review and comment.

All development projects are routed
to EDPC and PSC
Planning

10 2.5 Encourage the dedication of
conservation/open space easements or
the public acquisition of areas that are rich
in wildlife or of a fragile ecological nature
to ensure their protection.

Every new development reviewed
by Town requires conservation/open
space easement to be dedicated
Planning

3.1 Continue to require open space
easements along creeks and riparian
corridors.

Every new development reviewed
by Town requires conservation/open
space easement to be dedicated
Planning

4.3 Monitor construction and grading activities
to control dust.

Institute grading mortarium from
October to April
PW/Code Enforcement

5.3 Work with water purveyors to inform
homeowners of their potential water usage
in new landscape projects and to
recognize the benefits of water efficient
landscapes without significant burden to
the homeowners.

Staff met with Purisima hills water
district regarding landscape
watering and methods to reduce
water consumption
Planning

5.7 Continue to implement the Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Ordinance.

Ongoing. Staff inspected soil
erosion and sediment control
measures on projects that requires
grading/excavation during the rainy
season (10/1 – 4/30)
PW

11 5.9 Continue to limit the amount of impervious
surface in new development to reduce
urban runoff into storm drains, creeks and
the San Francisco Bay.

Town enforces Maximum
Development Area and promotes
replaces of impervious with pervious
surfaces
Planning/PW

6.2 Continue to require erosion control
measures on construction sites.

Staff reviews soil erosion and
sediment control plans and perform
site inspections to ensure adequate
soil erosion control measures
PW

6.5 Ensure that proposed septic systems meet
the health and safety standards of Santa
Clara County so that soil and groundwater
pollution does not occur.

All private wastewater systems are
reviewed and approved by County
Health Dept.

Planning/County
Environmental Health

8.1 Incorporate energy efficiency measures in
new Town facilities.

Town bought new battery electric
vehicles to replace gasoline vehicles
PW

9.2 In Town purchasing, encourage the
purchase of products that minimize
packaging, contain recycled materials, and
can be reused or recycled.

Town purchases recycled paper All depts

10.1 Continue to develop a comprehensive
inventory and map of historically
significant sites and structures. Review
Appendix A at least every five years and
Working with Foothill college on
preservation of Griffin House
Planning

12 update the inventory as appropriate.

Consider adding the following sites and
structures: Heritage House, Finn House,
Westwind Community Barn, Packard
House, Hidden Villa, Ginzton House, Lois
Crozier Hogle House, Fremont Hills
Country Club Water Tower, Jensen House
and Barn, Eshner House, and Stegner
House on South Fork.

Safety

2.2 Continue to utilize the geologic hazards
map and other available information from
reliable sources such as the United States
Geological Survey and California
Geological Survey to evaluate proposed
development and mitigate known geologic
hazards.

Every new development project,
planner check against the map and
determine if a Geotech report is
required.

Planning

2.3 Ensure that proper erosion and
sedimentation control measures are
undertaken for all development projects.

PWs

13 2.4 Regularly review the Town’s development
regulations and building codes and update
them as necessary to incorporate the best
available standards for seismic safety and
other geologic hazards.

Town adopts and updates the
California Building codes every
three years.

Building

2.5 Continue to require applicants to submit a
geotechnical report prepared by a licensed
geotechnical engineer for proposed new
residences and major additions on sites
that have a potential geologic hazard. In
cases where a geologic hazard is
confirmed, the engineering
recommendations in the geotechnical
report shall be implemented to avoid or
mitigate the probable effects of the hazard.

Town’s geology consultants Cotton
Shires review all Geotech reports
submitted with development projects
Planning

3.2 Continue to limit the amount of runoff in
site development projects.

Every new development project,
planner enforces maximum
development area and engineering
staff requires detention and
infiltration systems for each project
Planning/PW

14 3.3 Continue to implement the Flood Plain
Management provisions of the Municipal
Code.

Every new development project,
planner enforces maximum
development area and engineering
staff requires detention and
infiltration systems for each project
Planning/PW

4.2 Continue to refer plans for proposed site
development projects to the Santa Clara
County Fire Department for review and
comment.

All the projects and building permits
are routed to Fire department for
review
Planning/Building

4.6 Require public roads, private roads, and
driveways to be constructed and
maintained according to Fire Department
standards in order to accommodate fire
trucks and other emergency vehicles.

All new projects are per Fire
department’s requirements
Planning/Building

4.8 Encourage the use of fire-resistant
building materials and fire sprinklers
Town adopted Section R337 of the
California Residential Code which
requires ignition resistant exterior
materials for all new structures
Building

5.1 Continue to support the Santa Clara
County Sheriff’s efforts to minimize crime
in Los Altos Hills.

Town installed a 60-day pilot
program and installed License Plate
Reader cameras throughout the
Town
City Manager

15 5.2 Encourage residents to participate in the
Neighborhood Watch Program and
coordinate with the Santa Clara County
Sheriff’s Department to implement it.

Town has a neighborhood watch
program. Activated three
neighborhood watch groups in town
City Manager

7.1 Inform residents of potential hazards from
earthquakes, landslides, flooding and fire,
and of reasonable precautions that can be
taken.

Town website contains information
on the potential hazards in town
including recordings of live webinars
on Public Safety Power Shutoffs and
Wildfire Safety.

Santa Clara County Fire teaches
Personal Emergency Preparedness
classes.

City Manager

7.2 Train and equip Town emergency
personnel so they will be able to make a
quick, coordinated response to
emergencies.

Town has a training plan that is
approved by the City Manager with
training tracked by HR. Town use a
combination of recorded webinars,
in-person classes and written
materials (like the Emergency
Operations Plan and Checklists).

City Manager

7.3 Review the Emergency Operations Plan
and update it on a regular basis to ensure
EOP Base Plan was completely
rewritten in 2018 and is updated,
City Manager

16 that it provides for adequate response to
the full range of disasters identified in the
Safety Element.
when appropriate. Operational
checklists and job aids are also
updated as appropriate.

7.5 Work with other agencies through
programs such as the Silicon Valley
Regional Interoperability Project (SVRIP)
to improve communications and provide a
coordinated emergency response on a
regional level.

Town is part of SVRIP. Emergency
Managers participate in
communication discussions within
our County (Emergency Managers
Association, Ham radio groups,
County Office of Emergency
Management.). Town also
participates in the Bay Area Urban
Area Security Initiative (BAUASI)
PIO group. Also working with the
State when the topic of
communications comes up.

City Manager

7.6 In conjunction with the Los Altos Hills
County Fire District, provide an emergency
notification telephone system. Use the
system to alert residents to emergencies
and to communicate information on
Emergency Alerts are sent out
through Alert SCC - initiated by
sheriff or fire dept. Town uses the
Town website, Nixle, Facebook
and Nextdoor.com to communicate
information and updates. The new
City Manager

17 evacuation routes and other disasterrelated information.tool ZoneHaven is used, where people can log in to see if
their “zone” is being ordered to
evacuate and shows evacuation
routes.

Noise

1.2 Continue to restrict the hours of nonemergency grading and construction activities to specified days of the week and
times of day to minimize noise impacts on
neighboring residents and other sensitive
land uses.

Staff continue to enforce
construction operations hour to all
the contractors at the time of
building permit issuance.

Building

1.4 Continue to prohibit the location of
heating, ventilating and air conditioning
(HVAC) equipment, pool equipment,
pumps and similar equipment in setbacks.

Develop siting and noise attenuation
standards for HVAC equipment, pool
equipment, pumps and similar equipment.

Standards should be more stringent for
Staff does not allow of heating,
ventilating and air conditioning
(HVAC) equipment, pool equipment,
pumps and similar equipment in
setbacks as included in Municipal
Code section 5-2.02(e)
Planning

18 these types of equipment that produce
continuous noise than for sources that
emit noise occasionally.

1.5 Encourage the use of quiet pavement
materials in repaving projects including the
repaving of Interstate 280.

Caltrans repaved 280 with
rubberized asphalt in 2021
Caltrans

2.1 Evaluate noise impacts on surrounding
land uses during the site development
review and permitting process.

Noise sources are regulated per
Municipal Code section 5-2.02
during permitting process
Planning

2.4 Require the mitigation of all significant
noise impacts as a condition of project
approval.

Various conditions of approval are
added to mitigate noise impacts.

Planning
Open Space

1.2 Continue to require the dedication of open
space easements as a condition of
approval for development of parcels in
designated Open Space Conservation
Areas in order to protect steep slopes,
canyons and ravines, generally in excess
of 30% slope, as well as areas with
Open space committee reviews
development projects and
recommends dedicate of Open
Space Easements for steep slopes,
oaks, creeks etc
Planning

19 Heritage oak trees, or other
environmentally sensitive areas such as
along creeks and riparian corridors.

1.3 Continue to require the dedication of
pathway easements and the construction
of pathways or payment of in-lieu fees
when development is proposed on parcels
that include portions of on-road or off-road
pathways designated on the Pathway
Master Plan.

Pathway committee reviews
development projects and
recommends dedicate of Pathway
Easements in relation to the
Pathway Masterplan
Planning

2.1 Continue to require subdividers to
dedicate land for parks and recreation or,
in the alternative, pay fees through which
residential developments might facilitate
park land acquisition. The standard for
park and recreation dedications or in lieu
fees established under the Quimby Act is
a maximum of 5 acres per 1,000
population.

Engineering staff determine and
collect appropriate parks and
recreation fees for all subdivisions
per Town’s Municipal Code. In 2021,
Town collected $354,554.42 in
Parks & Recreation In-Lieu fee.

PW

2.2 Continue to require the dedication of
pathway easements as a condition of
approval of tentative maps and site
Pathway committee reviews
development projects and
recommends dedicate of Pathway
Planning

20 development permits for new residences
and major additions, consistent with the
Pathway Element and the Master Pathway
Plan. Where deemed appropriate, the
actual construction of these pathways will
be required as per Town standards.

Easements in relation to the
Pathway Masterplan

2.3 Continue to evaluate the recreation needs
of the community and the availability of
resources.

Completed annual inspections on
playground, maintenance of wood
fiber, inspection of fitness equipment
in June 2021, and increased usage
of baseball fields rental
Recreation
Pathways

4.1 Continue to implement the Master Path
Plan by requiring the dedication of
easements, construction of pathways
and/or payment of pathway fees as a
condition of approval for subdivisions and
site development permits.

Pathway committee reviews
development projects and
recommends dedicate of Pathway
Easements in relation to the
Pathway Masterplan
Planning/PW

21 4.2 Continue to improve the Town’s
maintenance of constructed pathways.
• Completed Town‐wide herbicide
spray for roadside
pathways and native path to fight
the Stinkwort growth
• Completed environmental review
for La Paloma/Robleda Pathway
• Completed design for Altamont
Plunge Pathway
• Opened the existing unofficial
pathway from East to West
Sunset to the public, added signage,
and performed
pathway maintenance where
needed
• Completed repairs and added
pathway delineation for the
Fran Stevenson pathway on Lupine
Rd
• Continued to work with Pathway
Committee to identify
and develop new pathway projects
PW

22 • Improved pathway delineation and
signage for the Saddle
Court pathway

3. Additional Content
• Local Government Planning Support Grants Status
AB 168 also requires an annual status report if the local jurisdiction received funding from the Local Government Planning Support Grants Program. In 2020, the Town applied for funding from the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant program and was granted in the amount of $65,000. The Town engaged M-Group to conduct Accessory Dwelling Unit survey in the Town. The survey was distributed to the residents between January 11, 2021 through march 5, 2021.

The goal of the survey was to collect information on the existing conditions of ADUs and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs), identify barriers to ADU development, and gather community input on potential incentives to encourage ADU construction. The survey collected 570 responses with 19 percent of respondents reporting that they owned an ADU or JADU on their property.
• Land use decision established by the local legislative body On November 18, 2021, the Town of Los Altos Hills adopted Urgency Ordinance, establishing objective standards and regulations to govern the development of qualified Senate Bill (SB) 9 subdivisions and development projects on residential zoned properties in the community. These objective design and subdivision standards are interim measures that will assist Los Altos Hills in considering and approving new residential units and subdivisions authorized by SB 9 while the Town considers and develops updated, permanent zoning regulations. During the effective term of the urgency ordinance, the Town will undertake further study and hold multiple public hearings regarding permanent revisions to the Town’s municipal code to ensure that SB 9 projects are consistent with the goals and policies of the Town’s General Plan and California State law. • Technology review including Geographic Information Systems (GIS) or establishment of web sites

23 Completed update of GIS basemap, GIS pathway layers and implemented updated public map portal. • Customer service improvements
Maintained in‐person public counter (outdoor) at Town Hall during Covid‐19 Pandemic.

Improved engagement with residents and neighbors on site development projects with virtual meetings and additional online resources. Updated existing forms and added new handouts are added to the website. Town also started added videos of all the Site Development/Fast Track hearings.

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element ImplementationPlanning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining
2 34 6 78 9
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Date Application Submitted+ (see instructions) Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low-Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Total PROPOSED Units by Project Total APPROVED Units by project Total DISAPPROVED Units by Project Was APPLICATION SUBMITTED Pursuant to GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Was a Density Bonus requested for this housing development? Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 2 0 8 2 11 31 54 54 0 33615009 33615009 24840 Summerhill
Ave 20802 SFD O 6/7/2017 1 1 1 No No
18228048 18228048 27985 Central
Drive 21126 SFD O 11/14/2017 1 1 1 No No
33642027 33642027 11768 Maria Lane 21191 SFD O 1/3/2018 1 1 1 No No18209033 18209033 27800 Via Feliz 21224 SFD O 1/25/2018 1 1 1 No No17536036 17536036 13389 Robleda Road BLD18-0215 SFD O 7/3/2018 1 1 1 No No17535025 17535025 13673 La Paloma Road BLD18-0307 SFD O 8/20/2018 1 1 1 No No18219044 18219044 27447 Edgerton Road BLD18-0331 SFD O 8/28/2018 1 1 1 No No18230047 18230047 26811 Moody Court BLD18-0295 SFD O 8/15/2018 1 1 1 No No33642027 33642027 11768 Maria Lane 21192 ADU R 1/3/2018 01 1 1 No No33619037 33619037 11871 Hilltop Drive BLD18-0279 ADU R 8/9/2018 10 1 1 No No18206023 18206023 26644 Purissima Road BLD18-0329 ADU R 8/28/2018 10 1 1 No No18209033 18209033 27800 Via Feliz 21225 ADU R 1/25/2018 1 1 1 No No 0 18214005 18214005 26460 Taaffe Road SD19-0001 SFD O 1/3/2019 1 1 1 No No18229038 18229038 27388 Sherlock Court SD19-0003 SFD O 1/9/2019 1 1 No No18226018 18226018 12255 Menalto Drive SD19-0011 SFD O 2/13/2019 1 1 1 No No33628003 33628003 12355 Stonebrook Drive SD19-0016 SFD O 3/14/2019 1 1 1 No No33628003 33628003 12355 Stonebrook Drive SD19-0016 ADU R 3/14/2019 1 1 1 No No33115061 33115061 10728 Mora Drive SD19-0019 SFD O 3/29/2019 1 1 No No33115062 33115062 10758 Mora Drive SD19-0020 SFD O 3/29/2019 1 1 No No17538032 17538032 25251 La Rena Lane SD19-0022 SFD O 4/2/2019 1 1 1 No No17538032 17538032 25251 La Rena Lane SD19-0022 ADU R 4/2/2019 1 1 1 No No33625004 33625004 24005 Oak Knoll Circle SD19-0023 SFD O 4/5/2019 1 1 1 No No33101027 33101027 11545 Crestridge Drive SD19-0027 SFD O 4/30/2019 1 1 1 No No Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus
10

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
23 56 89 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Entitlement Date Approved # of Units issued Entitlements Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness (see instructions) Date Issued # of Units issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness How many of the units were Extremely Low Income?+ Was Project APPROVED using GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Y/N Infill Units? Y/N+ Assistance Programs for Each Development (may select multiple - see instructions) Deed Restriction Type (may select multiple - see instructions) For units affordable without financial assistance or deed restrictions, explain how the locality determined the units were affordable (see instructions) Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction (years) (if affordable in perpetuity enter 1000)+ Number of Demolished/Dest royed Units Demolished or Destroyed Units Demolished/Des troyed Units Owner or Renter Total Density Bonus Applied to the Project (Percentage Increase in Total Allowable Units or Total Maximum Allowable Residential Gross Floor Area) Number of Other Incentives, Concessions, Waivers, or Other Modifications Given to the Project (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 0 12 0 11 0 14 25 62 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 5 00 104 0 33615009 33615009 24840 Summerhill Ave N/A 20802 SFD O 0 1 5/1/2018 1 0 0 NY 18228048 18228048 27985 Central Drive N/A 21126 SFD O 0 1 5/4/2018 1 0 0 NY33642027 33642027 11768 Maria Lane N/A 21191 SFD O 0 1 2/27/2018 1 0N Y 18209033 18209033 27800 Via Feliz N/A 21224 SFD O 0 1 5/1/2018 1 0N Y17536036 17536036 13389 Robleda Road N/A BLD18-0215 SFD O 0 1 8/24/2018 1 0 NY17535025 17535025 13673 La Paloma Road N/A BLD18-0307 SFD O 0 1 9/25/2018 1 0 NY18219044 18219044 27447 Edgerton Road N/A BLD18-0331 SFD O 0 1 10/3/2018 1 0 NY18230047 18230047 26811 Moody Court N/A BLD18-0295 SFD O 0 1 9/28/2018 1 0 NY 33642027 33642027 11768 Maria Lane N/A 21192 ADU R 0 1 2/27/2018 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33619037 33619037 11871 Hilltop Drive N/A BLD18-0279 ADU R 0 1 9/19/2018 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18206023 18206023 26644 Purissima Road N/A BLD18-0329 ADU R 0 1 10/30/2018 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18209033 18209033 27800 Via Feliz N/A 21225 ADU R 0 1 5/1/2018 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17524044 17524044 26925 Orchard Hill Lane 433-17-SD SFD O 1 3/6/2018 1 0 0 0 NY 017524044 17524044 26925 Orchard Hill Lane BLD18-0046 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2018 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17505018 17505018 14525 Miranda Rd 401-17-ZP-SD SFD O 1 3/13/2018 1 0 0N Y 17505018 17505018 14525 Miranda Rd BLD18-0055 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2018 1 0N Y 1 Demolished O 17536036 17536036 13389 Robleda Road 431-16-ZP-SD-GD SFD O 1 4/5/2018 1 0 0 NY 17554016 17554016 12735 Alto Verde 208-17-ZP-SD SFD O 1 4/24/2018 1 0 0N Y 17554016 17554016 12735 Alto Verde BLD18-0126 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2018 1 0N Y 1 Demolished O 33632081 33632081 25136 La Loma Drive 148-17-ZP-SD-GD SFD O 1 5/3/2018 1 0 0 NY 33632081 33632081 25136 La Loma Drive BLD18-0160 SFD O 1 5/3/2018 1 1 8/14/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33643013 33643013 25700 Bassett Lane 404-17-ZP-SD-GD SFD O 1 5/3/2018 1 0 0 NY 17535026 17535026 13661 La Paloma Rd 374-17-ZP-SD SFD O 1 5/8/2018 1 0 0 NY 17535026 17535026 13661 La Paloma Rd BLD18-0197 SFD O 0 1 9/10/2018 1 0 NY 1 Destroyed O 17505008 17505008 14510 Manuella Rd 42-18-ZP-SD SFD O 1 5/8/2018 1 0 0 NY 17505008 17505008 14510 Manuella Rd BLD18-0178 SFD O 0 1 8/22/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18216027 18216027 25380 Becky Lane 59-18-ZP-SD SFD R 1 5/29/2018 1 0 0N Y 18216027 18216027 25380 Becky Lane BLD18-0176 SFD O 0 1 8/7/2018 1 0N Y 1 Demolished O 33635081 33635081 10570 Blandor Way 56-18-ZP-SD SFD O 1 6/19/2018 1 0 0 NY 33635081 33635081 10570 Blandor Way BLD18-0289 SFD O 0 1 9/11/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18230047 18230047 26811 Moody Court 344-17-ZP-SD-VA SFD O 1 7/5/2018 1 0 0 NY 33619037 33619037 11871 Hilltop Drive SD18-0006 SFD O 1 7/10/2018 1 0 0N Y 33619037 33619037 11871 Hilltop Drive BLD18-0278 SFD O 0 1 9/19/2018 1 0N Y 1 Demolished O 18219044 18219044 27447 Edgerton Road 60-18-ZP-SD SFD O 1 7/24/2018 1 0 0 NY17535025 17535025 13673 La Paloma Road SD18-0004 SFD O 1 7/24/2018 1 0 0 NY 17548036 17548036 26088 Duval Way 68-18-ZP-SD SFD O 1 7/31/2018 1 0 0 NY 17548036 17548036 26088 Duval Way BLD18-0313 SFD O 0 1 9/26/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17553022 17553022 26550 Anacapa Dr 13-18-ZP-SD SFD O 1 8/2/2018 1 0 0 NY17553022 17553022 26550 Anacapa Dr BLD18-0327 SFD O 0 1 9/28/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18232029 18232029 13875 Mir Mirou Dr 21265 SFD O 0 1 5/4/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33622019 33622019 12520 Barley Hill Rd 21275 SFD O 0 1 6/19/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O17536010 17536010 13335 Wildcrest Dr 21202 SFD O 0 1 1/11/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17533073 17533073 26634 Snell Ct BLD18-0017 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2018 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17544026 17544026 12869 La Cresta Dr SD18-0001 SFD O 1 9/6/2018 1 0 0 NY 17533020 17533020 26880 Ortega Dr SD18-0017 SFD O 1 9/25/2018 1 0 0 NY 18220011 18220011 27240 Natoma Road SD18-0033 SFD O 1 9/25/2018 1 0 0 NY 33638025 33638025 23520 Ravensbury Ave 133-16-ZP-SD-GD SFD O 1 11/13/2018 1 0 0 NY 33638025 33638025 23520 Ravensbury Ave 133-16-ZP-SD-GD ADU R 1 11/13/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33639007 33639007 23651 Camino Hermosa 123-17-ZP-SD ADU R 1 3/23/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17557012 17557012 27881 Baker Lane 206-16-ZP-SD ADU R 1 5/8/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18218045 18218045 28550 Matadero Creek Ln 320-17-ZP-SD ADU O 1 5/15/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17540006 17540006 12791 Normandy Lane SD18-0010 ADU R 1 6/12/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17540006 17540006 12791 Normandy Lane BLD18-0155 ADU R 0 1 6/15/2018 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18206023 18206023 26644 Purissima Road 61-18-ZP-SD ADU R 1 7/24/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17548035 17548035 26100 Duval Way 53-18-ZP-SD ADU R 1 10/23/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17549010 17549010 25769 Elena Rd SD18-0021 ADU R 1 11/19/2018 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18203032 18203032 13140 Avila ct 18791 SFD O 0 0 1 11/1/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18226029 18226029 12345 Briones Way 19162 ADU R 0 01 4/5/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17553016 17553016 26475 Anacapa Dr 19196 SFD O 0 0 1 4/2/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33630060 33630060 25055 La Loma Rd 19233 SFD O 0 0 1 2/26/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17525069 17525069 13638 Old Altos Rd 19291 SFD O 0 0 1 12/10/2018 1 N Y 17525069 17525069 13638 Old Altos Rd 19358 ADU R 0 0 1 1/29/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18213036 18213036 26727 Taaffe Rd 19422 SFD O 0 0 1 4/27/2018 1 N Y 18242019 18242019 27798 Via Ventanna Way 19467 SFD O 0 0 1 5/25/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17543050 17543050 12830 Deer Creek Ln 19509 SFD O 0 0 1 8/2/2018 1 N Y 17544064 17544064 26890 Alejandro Dr 19546 SFD O 0 0 1 10/26/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18230030 18230030 26691 Moody Rd 19722 SFD O 0 0 1 4/5/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18212054 18212054 12121 Foothill Ln 19809 SFD O 0 0 1 10/19/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17522017 17522017 14161 Miranda Rd 19839 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17535009 17535009 13801 La Paloma Rd 19940 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17535009 17535009 13801 La Paloma Rd 19941 ADU R 0 01 1/22/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33623013 33623013 12386 Priscilla Ln 20019 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33635006 33635006 10888 Magdalena Rd 20160 SFD O 0 0 1 4/27/2018 1 N Y 33635008 33635008 10880 Magdalena Rd 20163 SFD O 0 0 1 6/7/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17533022 17533022 26810 Ortega Dr 20198 SFD O 0 0 1 9/4/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17553006 17553006 26850 St Francis Rd 20207 SFD O 0 0 1 6/7/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18219065 18219065 27333 Ursula Ln 20219 SFD O 0 0 1 4/3/2018 1 N Y33618005 33618005 24183 Dawnridge Dr 20224 SFD O 0 0 1 10/22/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33631001 33631001 25616 Moody Rd 20236 SFD O 0 0 1 6/18/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17525028 17525028 26860 Robleda Ct 20292 SFD O 0 0 1 5/18/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33635007 33635007 10800 Magdalena Rd 20297 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2018 1 N Y 17556011 17556011 26355 Esperanza Dr 20299 SFD O 0 0 1 10/19/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18208034 18208034 13816 Page Mill Rd 20398 SFD O 0 0 1 11/14/2018 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33642029 33642029 11637 Dawson Dr 19725 SFD O 0 0 1 12/17/2018 1 N Y 17525070 17525070 13671 Burke Rd 19420 ADU R 0 0 1 7/25/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17543050 17543050 12830 Deer Creek Ln 19510 ADU R 0 0 1 8/3/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33642029 33642029 11637 Dawson Dr 19726 ADU R 0 01 12/17/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18226030 18226030 12305 Briones Way 20550 ADU R 0 01 10/1/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17554007 17554007 12670 Corte Madera Ln 16937 ADU R 0 0 1 12/5/2018 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 0 0 0
33121002 33121002 10842 W. Loyola Drive 117-16-CDP SFD O 1 3/7/2019 1 0 0 NY17544027 17544027 12857 La Cresta Drive 232-17-SD SFD O 1 3/5/2019 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18242027 18242027 27911 Via Ventana Way CDP19-0003 SFD O 1 9/5/2019 1 0 0 NY 17526013 17526013 13505 Burke Road SD18-0053 SFD O 1 2/5/2019 1 0 0 NY 17554004 17554004 12640 Corte Madera Lane SD18-0054 SFD O 1 5/7/2019 1 0 0 NY 17554004 17554004 12640 Corte Madera Lane SD18-0054 ADU R 1 5/7/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33616028 33616028 12468 Casa Mia Way SD18-0057 SFD O 1 1/29/2019 1 0 0 NY 17554075 17554075 26303 Esperanza Drive SD18-0059 SFD O 1 3/12/2019 1 0 0 NY 18210023 18210023 13109 Byrd Lane SD18-0069 SFD O 1 7/30/2019 1 0 0N Y 18210023 18210023 13109 Byrd Lane SD18-0069 ADU R 1 7/30/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18212078 18212078 27860 Black Mountain Road SD18-0071 SFD O 1 3/5/2019 1 0 0 NY 18212078 18212078 27860 Black Mountain Road SD18-0071 ADU R 1 3/5/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18209022 18209022 27772 Lupine Road SD18-0073 SFD O 1 5/14/2019 1 0 0 NY18226018 18226018 12255 Menalto Drive SD19-0011 SFD O 1 4/30/2019 1 0 0 NY 33628003 33628003 12355 Stonebrook Drive SD19-0016 SFD O 1 8/1/2019 1 0 0 NY 33628003 33628003 12355 Stonebrook Drive SD19-0016 ADU R 1 8/1/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17538032 17538032 25251 La Rena Lane SD19-0022 SFD O 1 12/10/2019 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17538032 17538032 25251 La Rena Lane SD19-0022 ADU R 1 12/10/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33101027 33101027 11545 Crestridge Drive SD19-0027 SFD O 1 9/5/2019 1 0 0 NY17549001 17549001 25473 Elena Road SD18-0049 ADU R 1 5/7/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18209033 18209033 27800 Via Feliz SD18-0066 ADU R 1 1/9/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18211014 18211014 12345 Melody Lane SD18-0067 ADU R 1 3/5/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33618011 33618011 24180 Dawnridge Drive SD19-0006 ADU R 1 10/24/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18217038 18217038 12051 Moody Springs Court SD19-0009 ADU R 1 5/7/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18250042 18250042 13850 Paseo Del Roble SD19-0017 ADU R 1 4/23/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18217054 18217054 12181 Padre Court SD19-0018 ADU R 1 4/26/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18241005 18241005 14146 Amherst Court SD19-0032 ADU R 1 8/15/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle Density Bonus
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Project Identifier Demolished/Destroyed Units (CCR Title 25 §6202)

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
18242038 18242038 27975 Via Ventana Way SD19-0040 ADU R 1 8/28/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33628066 33628066 12331 Stonebrook Court SD19-0045 ADU R 1 10/30/2019 1 0 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33639031 33639031 10511 Magdalena Road BLD18-0473 SFD O 0 1 5/1/2019 1 0 NY 17544026 17544026 12869 La Cresta Drive BLD19-0026 SFD O 0 1 4/29/2019 1 0 NY 17548035 17548035 26100 Duval Way BLD19-0083 SFD O 0 1 7/2/2019 1 0 NY 17526013 17526013 13505 Burke Road BLD19-0093 SFD O 0 1 5/13/2019 1 0 NY 33617020 33617020 12450 Hilltop Drive BLD19-0111 SFD O 0 1 6/10/2019 1 0 NY 33616028 33616028 12468 Casa Mia Way BLD19-0168 SFD O 0 1 7/10/2019 1 0 NY 18212078 18212078 27860 Black Mountain Road BLD19-0186 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2019 1 0 NY 17554075 17554075 26303 Esperanza Drive BLD19-0195 SFD O 0 1 8/1/2019 1 0 NY 18209022 18209022 27772 Lupine Road BLD19-0218 SFD O 0 1 8/5/2019 1 0 NY 18226018 18226018 12255 Menalto Drive BLD19-0219 SFD O 0 1 8/1/2019 1 0 NY 33628003 33628003 12355 Stonebrook Drive BLD19-0418 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2019 1 0 NY 17548035 17548035 26100 Duval Way BLD19-0084 ADU R 0 1 5/8/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18211014 18211014 12345 Melody Lane BLD19-0154 ADU R 0 1 9/10/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18250042 18250042 13850 Paseo Del Roble BLD19-0165 ADU R 0 1 7/25/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18217054 18217054 12181 Padre Court BLD19-0178 ADU R 0 1 7/29/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18212078 18212078 27860 Black Mountain Road BLD19-0187 ADU R 0 1 7/1/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17549010 17549010 25769 Elena Road BLD19-0322 ADU R 0 1 11/6/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18242038 18242038 27975 Via Ventana Way BLD19-0399 ADU R 0 1 12/17/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33628003 33628003 12355 Stonebrook Drive BLD19-0419 ADU R 0 1 10/1/2019 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18245004 18245004 26495 Altamont Road 19243 SFD O 0 0 1 10/3/2019 1 N Y17535024 17535024 13685 La Paloma Road 20032 SFD O 0 0 1 8/28/2019 1 N Y17536010 17536010 13335 Wildcrest Drive 20276 SFD O 0 0 1 12/20/2019 1 N Y33117027 33117027 10490 W. Loyola Drive 20508 SFD O 0 0 1 10/30/2019 1 N Y18241006 18241006 14172 Amherst Court 20887 SFD O 0 0 1 12/16/2019 1 N Y17535033 17535033 13861 La Paloma Road 20949 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2019 1 N Y33629003 33629003 24925 Oneonta Drive 20959 SFD O 0 0 1 7/11/2019 1 N Y 33642027 33642027 11768 Maria Lane 21191 SFD O 0 0 1 5/1/2019 1 N Y17524044 17524044 26925 Orchard Hill Lane BLD18-0046 SFD O 0 0 1 11/19/2019 1 N Y 17524037 17524037 26927 Beatrice Lane 20638 ADU R 0 01 1/7/2019 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18241006 18241006 14172 Amherst Court 20888 ADU R 0 01 8/19/2019 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17535033 17535033 13861 La Paloma Road 20950 ADU R 0 01 11/18/2019 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33642027 33642027 11768 Maria Lane 21192 ADU R 0 0 1 5/1/2019 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18250042 18250042 13850 Paseo Del Roble BLD19-0165 ADU R 0 0 1 10/8/2019 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18217054 18217054 12181 Padre Court BLD19-0178 ADU R 0 0 1 12/30/2019 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17527019 17527019 13210 E. Sunset Dr SD18-0008 SFD O 1 7/2/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33639006 33639006 23691 Camino Hermoso Drive SD18-0063 SFD O 1 2/25/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33625004 33625004 24005 Oak Knoll Circle SD19-0023 SFD O 1 1/7/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33624007 33624007 12360 Priscilla Lane SD19-0046 SFD O 1 1/14/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33635088 33635088 24752 Olive Tree Lane SD19-0052 SFD O 1 2/11/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O18245015 18245015 26898 Dezahara Way SD19-0071 SFD O 1 1/14/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17544055 17544055 13210 La Cresta Drive SD19-0073 SFD O 1 1/21/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18217066 18217066 25538 Hidden Springs Court SD19-0074 SFD O 1 4/21/2020 1 0 0 NY 18216007 18216007 25750 Vinedo Lane SD19-0076 SFD O 1 6/9/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18212046 18212046 12170 Dawn Lane SD19-0078 SFD O 1 4/21/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17523070 17523070 13940 La Paloma Road SD19-0090 SFD O 1 5/7/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18248038 18248038 27408 Deer Springs Way SD20-0002 SFD O 1 7/7/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17527033 17527033 13254 E. Sunset Drive SD20-0008 SFD O 1 7/2/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18211082 18211082 27575 Black Mountain Road SD20-0009 SFD O 1 5/26/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17545055 17545055 26685 Purissima Road SD20-0030 SFD O 1 8/11/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33616055 33616055 24490 Amigos Court SD20-0033 SFD O 1 8/11/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33618012 33618012 24160 Dawnridge Drive SD20-0040 SFD O 1 8/11/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18216053 18216053 25680 Elena Road SD20-0050 SFD O 1 12/1/2020 1 0 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33121002 33121002 10842 W. Loyola Drive BLD19-0402 SFD O 0 1 7/20/2020 1 0 NY 33101027 33101027 11545 Crestridge Avenue BLD19-0451 SFD O 0 1 5/4/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18242027 18242027 27911 Via Ventana Way BLD19-0457 SFD O 0 1 7/10/2020 1 0 NY 17554004 17554004 12640 Corte Madera Lane BLD19-0591 SFD O 0 1 3/11/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33624007 33624007 12360 Priscilla Lane BLD20-0079 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33635088 33635088 24752 Olive Tree Lane BLD20-0130 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18245015 18245015 26898 Dezahara Way BLD20-0151 SFD O 0 1 9/17/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17536036 17536036 13389 Robleda Road BLD20-0181 SFD O 0 1 6/22/2020 1 1 2/9/2022 1 N Y18212046 18212046 12170 Dawn Lane BLD20-0198 SFD O 0 1 7/24/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 17523070 17523070 13940 La Paloma Road BLD20-0233 SFD O 0 1 8/11/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18210023 18210023 13109 Byrd Lane BLD20-0263 SFD O 0 1 10/5/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18211082 18211082 27575 Black Mountain Road BLD20-0320 SFD O 0 1 9/9/2020 1 1 2/11/2022 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33625004 33625004 24005 Oak Knoll Circle BLD20-0356 SFD O 0 1 10/6/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 33643019 33643019 25788 Bassett Lane BLD20-0361 SFD O 0 1 10/15/2020 1 0 NY 33618012 33618012 24160 Dawnridge Drive BLD20-0381 SFD O 0 1 10/29/2020 1 0 NY 1 Demolished O 18226019 18226019 12251 Menalto Drive BLD19-0406 ADU R 0 1 7/15/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17549001 17549001 25473 Elena Road BLD19-0575 ADU R 0 1 6/23/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17554004 17554004 12640 Corte Madera Lane BLD19-0592 ADU R 0 1 3/11/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33628066 33628066 12331 A Stonebrook Court BLD19-0600 ADU R 0 1 5/14/2020 1 1 4/9/2021 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17523039 17523039 13964 A Fremont Pines Lane BLD20-0112 ADU R 0 1 7/17/2020 1 1 10/13/2021 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33617020 33617020 12450 Hilltop Drive BLD20-0149 ADU R 0 1 5/28/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18213036 18213036 26727 Taaffe Road BLD20-0150 ADU R 0 1 7/21/2020 1 1 3/1/2022 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33115051 33115051 10691 Mora Drive BLD20-0162 ADU R 0 1 6/16/2020 1 1 11/18/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18231028 18231028 2120 Old Page Mill Road BLD20-0225 ADU R 0 1 7/29/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17523070 17523070 13940 La Paloma Road BLD20-0234 ADU R 0 1 8/11/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17542064 17542064 26950 Arastradero Road BLD20-0256 ADU R 0 1 11/23/2020 1 1 11/8/2021 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17535024 17535024 13685 La Paloma Road BLD20-0262 ADU R 0 1 9/1/2020 1 1 10/15/2021 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17526003 17526003 25621 Deerfield Drive BLD20-0271 ADU R 0 1 9/11/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33641018 33641018 11001 Magdalena Road BLD20-0278 ADU R 0 1 11/13/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17548008 17548008 12516 Robleda Road BLD20-0287 ADU R 0 1 12/3/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18245015 18245015 26898 Dezahara Way BLD20-0152 ADU R 0 1 9/17/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18210023 18210023 13109 Byrd Lane BLD20-0264 ADU R 0 1 10/5/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17523035 17523035 13981 Fremont Pines Lane BLD20-0305 ADU R 0 1 10/15/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17555039 17555039 12698 La Cresta Drive BLD20-0308 ADU R 0 1 9/15/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18211082 18211082 27575 Black Mountain Road BLD20-0319 ADU R 0 1 9/9/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17542016 17542016 13428 Carillo Lane BLD20-0335 ADU R 0 1 9/24/2020 1 1 1/20/2022 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18248038 18248038 27408 Deer Springs Way BLD20-0351 ADU R 0 1 10/9/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33618012 33618012 24160 Dawnridge Drive BLD20-0382 ADU R 0 1 12/1/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17508012 17508012 25721 La Lanne Court BLD20-0465 ADU R 0 1 12/4/2020 1 1 9/21/2021 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18212046 18212046 12170 Dawn Lane BLD20-0198 ADU R 0 1 7/24/2020 1 0 NY Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18206048 18206048 26620 Purissima Road 19504 ADU R 0 01 5/4/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17502033 17502033 26140 Robb Road 20853 ADU R 0 0 1 2/11/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17505020 17505020 14460 Miranda Court 20885 ADU R 0 0 1 5/26/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17538007 17538007 25383 La Rena Drive 20956 ADU R 0 0 1 9/4/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18206034 18206034 26270 Purissima Road 19995 ADU R 0 01 1/7/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18210061 18210061 13112 Maple Leaf Court 20071 ADU R 0 01 4/9/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18206023 18206023 26644 Purissima Road BLD18-0329 ADU R 0 01 8/3/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18218045 18218045 28550 Matadero Creek Lane BLD18-0459 ADU R 0 0 1 11/5/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18211014 18211014 12345 Melody Lane BLD19-0154 ADU R 0 01 7/21/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 17549010 17549010 25769 Elena Road BLD19-0322 ADU R 0 0 1 12/8/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 33115051 33115051 10691 Mora Drive BLD20-0162 ADU R 0 01 11/18/2020 1 N Y Based on survey of ADUs built in the last cycle 18210039 18210039 13456 South Fork Lane 19254 SFD O 0 0 1 2/5/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18211061 18211061 27470 Black Mountain Road 19486 SFD O 0 0 1 5/8/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O18206048 18206048 26620 Purissima Road 19503 SFD O 0 0 1 5/4/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O18206034 18206034 26270 Purissima Road 19994 SFD O 0 0 1 1/2/2020 1 N Y 18210061 18210061 13112 Maple Leaf Court 20070 SFD O 0 0 1 4/7/2020 1 N Y 17524062 17524062 26062 Todd Lane 20274 SFD O 0 0 1 5/15/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 33623021 33623021 12398 Stonebrook Drive 20611 SFD O 0 0 1 9/16/2020 1 N Y 18223017 18223017 27150 Julietta Lane 20740 SFD O 0 0 1 6/26/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17502033 17502033 26140 Robb Road 20852 SFD O 0 0 1 2/10/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17538007 17538007 25383 La Rena Drive 20955 SFD O 0 0 1 9/4/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O33622019 33622019 12520 Barley Hill Road 21275 SFD O 0 0 1 3/12/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17533073 17533073 26634 Snell Court BLD18-0017 SFD O 0 0 1 10/28/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 18216027 18216027 25380 Becky Lane BLD18-0176 SFD O 0 0 1 11/2/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O 17505008 17505008 14510 Manuella Road BLD18-0178 SFD O 0 0 1 3/20/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element ImplementationPlanning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202) 1 34
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years) Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level Deed Restricted - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted 5 4 5 3 5 15 12 - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted 2 3 2 1 2 6 12 - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted 2 1 2 1 1 4 13 - -
Above Moderate 15 8 11 4 8 8 4 9 - - 52 -
121
17 19 13 13 16 29 46 - - 153 8
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals and must be reported as very low-income units. -
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only included units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 6th cycle.Total RHNATotal Units Income Level
Very LowLowPlease note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 8 49
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs. 24 Moderate
46 28 32
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 28 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
-

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 12
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 12
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 13
25 62
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 18 21 10
2 to 4 0 0 0
5 + 0 0 0
ADU 0 41 5
MH 0 0 0
Total 18 62 15
54 54
54 0
0 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 00
Low 0 00
Moderate 0 00
Above Moderate 0 00
Total 0 00
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto‐populated based on amounts entered in rows 15‐26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Other
Funding Notes
ADU Inventory and Rent Survey $65,000.00 $32,000.00 None Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto‐populated from Table A2) Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
18 18
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 12
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 11
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 14
25 62
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 4
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 1
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
0 5
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
$                                                                                                                           65,000.00 Task Status
Completed
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low

Jurisdiction Los Altos Hills
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation

12. Program - Informational brochures on 2nd units and review of incentives to encourage 2nd units Provide up to date information on second units and consider amending Town policies and codes to encourage additional 2nd unit construction Ongoing. Staff has prepared a brochure with information on the Town's website.

Public information brochure completed. New ADU ordinance conforming to state law adopted in August 2020, and includes height and floor area incentives for certain types of ADUs. Staff continues to update the Town website.

13. Program - Reducing and waiving fees
Develop and adopt criteria for reducing or waiving permit, sewer and other fees for 2nd units 12/1/2015 - Completed 2020
Pathway fees have been removed on ADUs under 900 square feet and on all ADUs until the RHNA affordable housing unit numbers are met for Cycle 5. Sewer fees have been reduced by 50% on all ADUs.

14. Program - Nonconforming parking Allow the use of non-conforming parking areas to meet 2nd unit parking requirement 12/1/2016 - Completed 2020 Changes to state law allow for reduced parking requirements for 2nd units. Zoning Code modified to reflect changes to state law and encourage use of existing nonconforming parking areas. City Council adopted new ADU ordinance in September 2020.

15. Program - Amnesty Program
Develop and amnesty program to legalize undocumented 2nd units 12/1/2016 - Completed 2020
Amnesty program language was developed and included in the new ADU ordinance adopted in September 2020.

16. Program - Allow 2nd units on substandard
parcels
Modify the zoning ordinance to allow for attached 2nd units on substandard parcels
12/1/2016 - Completed 2020
ADUs are now permitted on all properties and code language is included in the new ADU ordinance adopted in September 2020.

17. Program - Allow 1,200 sq.ft. 2nd units
Modify the zoning ordinance to allow for 1,200 sq.ft. 2nd units 12/1/2016 - Completed 2020
ADUs up to 1,200 square feet are now permitted and code language is included in the new ADU ordinance adopted in September 2020.

Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)

18. Program - Recognize
alternate structures as 2nd units
Evaluate existing guest houses, studios and other habitable structures to determine if they qualify as a 2nd unit Ongoing The Town reviews properties when a development proposal is submitted and encourages owners to consider building an ADU.

19. Program - Affordable housing at Foothill College
Staff to meet annually with college administration and consider rezoning the college property to allow multifamily affordable housing for staff and students Ongoing Staff periodically meets with college administration. Rezoning process has not been initiated. Will consider rezoning during next HE update process.

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS March 17, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBAPPLICATION FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY

SERVICE HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS, AND
APPROPRIATING $200,000 FROM THE UNRESERVED GENERAL
FUND FOR THE 25% MATCH NEEDED FOR THE GRANT.

FROM: Cody Einfalt, Management Analyst II
APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Discuss the proposed wildfire mitigation program and adopt the attached resolution authorizing the submittal of a sub-application to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and appropriating $200,000 from the unreserved general fund for the 25% match needed from the Town for the grant.

BACKGROUND:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides funds to state agencies, local governments, special districts, and non-profits through their competitive Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). The purpose of the HMGP is to reduce the risk of loss of life and property due to natural disasters. In California, these funds are administered by the California Office of Emergency Services HMGP unit.

Eligible projects for the HMGP must be aligned with the Town’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The most current plan for Los Altos Hills is from January 2017 (Attachment 2). As of January 2022, the next iteration of the plan has begun to be drafted through efforts of the Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management staff. Within the 2017 plan, there are several goals that relate to addressing wildfire concerns within the Town.

Town staff was alerted to the HMGP funding opportunity around the turn of the new year.

In response, Town staff worked with resident Allan Epstein to design a proposal to submit for the grant. The proposal included a home hardening and defensible space program to strengthen the community’s resilience to wildfires in the upcoming fire seasons. The first step in the process was to submit a Notice of Intent to Apply (NOI) to the HMGP to identify that the Town was interested in pursuing the grant funds. On February 14, 2022, Town staff submitted a NOI for the wildfire mitigation program mentioned above.

On February 17, 2022, the State reviewed the Town’s proposed wildfire mitigation program and determined that the proposal was eligible for the HMGP. The State has invited the Town to submit a sub-application as the next step in the application process. The subapplication from the Town must be submitted by April 8, 2022.

AGENDA ITEM #11.A

2 The HMGP requires that the Town identify a 25% non-federal fund match to the grant funds being requested through the program. One of the components of the sub-application is a commitment letter from the Town for its share of the fiscal cost of the program. Town staff has been advised that a resolution appropriating the Town’s share of the funds to this program would be required as a component of the sub-application.

The proposed resolution attached to this staff report is for the appropriation of Town funds to this program, should the Council decide to direct staff to pursue this grant opportunity.

There is no set timeframe for when grant funds could be awarded to those who apply.

PROPOSED PROGRAM:

The proposed wildfire mitigation program submitted to the State involves two activities:

1. Eliminating wood shake roofing within the Town through retrofitting built structures with ignition resistant roofing; and

2. Creating a defensible space for wildfire hazard homes in Town The program is be modeled after Cal OES/CAL FIRE’s community home hardening program to retrofit, harden, and create defensible space for homes at high risk to wildfires.

The program also responds to the call in the Recovery California Wildfire Mitigation Program for, "Non-demonstration communities that are interested in developing a local home hardening program."
Home hardening and defensible space creation are proven methods to reduce the likelihood of wildfire damage. The hope is to leverage the tools and lessons learned throughout this proposed program and apply them to increase the number of hardened homes and strengthen community resilience to wildfires.

The proposal is structured in a phased approach. In Phase 1, being the first year, the Town will hire a Wildfire Mitigation Manager to develop the program’s logistics, qualify the vendors who will be involved in the program, hold an application process for residents to apply, review and qualify 30 wood shake roof replacement homes to harden and 50 defensible space participants (some will be both). Once the subject homes are identified, full details on the homes are required to be submitted to the State for review.

The selected property owners would need to make a commitment to the program to be eligible. Any resident who elects to receive a roof replacement must also take measures to create a defensible space around their home to be eligible.

In the second phase, conducted over the second and third years of the program, the actual work would be performed to home harden (roof replacements), create defensible space, inspect the work, and certify that the job is complete. The Wildfire Mitigation Manager would be responsible for all state reporting for this program.

3 2022 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

Applying for the HMGP was not identified as one of the Council’s priorities for 2022.

Should the City Council approve staff to submit a sub-application for this project and subsequently that the Town be awarded funds within the calendar year, changes to the 2022 priority list will need to be discussed. Additional resources would need to be identified as well as support from our volunteer committees.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

According to a model that was developed for this potential program, the estimated total activity cost is $2.7 million over a three year period. The HMGP requires a 25% nonfederal fund match in relation to the funds being ask for from the program. This means that $2 million would be the federal request share and $700,000 would be the non-federal fund match.

The matching finds do not have to completely come from the Town’s reserves. The proposal Wildfire Mitigation program has a cost sharing structure between the Town and the involved residents of the program. In the proposal, the residents who are identified for a roof replacement would be required to commit roughly 25% of the cost of the work on their own. The remaining funds would be covered by the grant.

Of the $700,000 needed for the non-federal match, the Town would be committing roughly $200,000 over the course of a three year period. Based on an approximation prepared by Mr. Epstein and staff, this would cover the cost of hiring the Wildfire Mitigation Manager, and all the administrative costs associated with running the program.

A full financial model for this program can be seen in Attachment 3.

At this time, based on the financial model, the Council must appropriate $200,000 to this program if the Council wishes to apply. Should the Town’s sub-application make it to the next stage in the application process, a more robust discussion of expenses will come back to Council to be discussed.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (March 8, 2017)

3. Draft Financial Model for the Wildfire Mitigation Program

4. Local Early Action Planning Grant Application Guidelines

Resolution -22 Page 1
RESOLUTION -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS

ALTOS HILLS AUTHORIZING SUBAPPLICATION FOR THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICE

HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS, AND
APPROPRIATING $200,000 FROM THE UNRESERVED GENERAL
FUND FOR THE 25% MATCH NEEDED FOR THE GRANT.

WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides funds to state agencies, local governments, special districts, and non-profits through their Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMPG). In California, these funds are administered by the California Office of Emergency Services HMPG unit; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the HMPG is to reduce the risk of loss of life and property due to natural disasters; and
WHEREAS, the Town designed a home hardening and defensible space program for this grant opportunity to strengthen the community’s resilience to wildfires in the upcoming fire seasons; and
WHEREAS, The HMGP requires that the Town identify a 25% non-federal fund match to the grant funds being requested through the program.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills hereby has reviewed the proposed wildfire mitigation program to be submitted to the HMPG and appropriates $200,000 from the unreserved general fund for the Town’s match to this program.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on 17th of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

By:

George Tyson, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____
Deborah L. Padovan, City Clerk
Attachment 1

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-1

1. TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS

1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Suzanne Avila, Planning Director
26379 Fremont Rd.

Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Telephone: 650-941-7222
e-mail Address: [email protected]
Marsha Hovey, Consultant
26379 Fremont Rd.

Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Telephone: 408-722-1210
e-mail Address: [email protected]

1.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE
The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history:
• Date of Incorporation— January 27, 1956
• Current Population—8,658 as of January 1, 2016
• Population Growth— 1.95 percent since 2010, 0.7 percent 2015 to 2016 • Location and Description— The Town of Los Altos Hills is a residential community in the northwestern region of Santa Clara County, California. It is thirty-five miles south of San Francisco, five miles south of Stanford University, and seventeen miles north of downtown San Jose. The Town encompasses nine square miles, making it one of the smallest incorporated cities in Santa Clara County. It borders the City of Palo Alto and Palo Alto’s Pearson-Arastradero Preserve to the north and west, the City of Los Altos to the east and the Mid Peninsula Regional Open Space District’s Rancho San Antonio to the south. There is an additional 5.2 square miles of unincorporated land adjacent to the Town’s southern boundary that is designated within the Town’s “sphere of influence.” In addition Foothill Community College is located within the Town boundaries new Highway 280 and Moody Road. There are several distinct features of Los Altos Hills. One is the Town’s dedication to the preservation of a “residential-agricultural” conditional lifestyle, which is shown through open lands, rolling hills, and a rural atmosphere. The Town’s Pathway System manifests this lifestyle, with 85 miles of trails and off-road paths that connect the community. Another significant feature of the Town is the absence of commercial and industrial zones. Permitted uses include schools, religious, and recreational facilities. The Town’s zoning requires a minimum lot size of one acre.

The topography of Los Altos Hills provides significant constraints to development, such as steep slopes, unstable soils, seismic faults, and other natural hazards. Three major faults traverse the Town of Los Altos Hills: (1) Berrocal Fault, which runs from west to east, (2) Altamont Fault, parallel to Berrocal Fault, and (3) Monte Vista Fault, running from northwest to southeast. The Town is also near the San Andreas Fault and all are categorized as potentially active.

Attachment 2

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-2
• Brief History— Ohlone Indians were the first known residents of Los Altos Hills. They were part of a group of Native Americans who once inhabited small villages throughout the Santa Clara Valley. Both Los Altos and Los Altos Hills have been substantiated as sites of early Ohlone villages. In 1955, Indian remains and artifacts such as mortars and pestles were found on the Peck property east of Moody Road. In 1964, developers on O'Keefe Lane unearthed more human remains and artifacts. Still later, in 1970, an Ohlone village and burial ground of major significance came to light on the Costello property on O'Keefe Lane, prompting archaeological study by Foothill College and others. Additional mounds and village sites have since been excavated along Permanente and Matadero Creeks.

Two large Spanish-Mexican land grants comprise Los Altos Hills: Rancho La Purissima Concepcion, 4,436 acres granted to Native Americans Jose Gorgonio and his son Jose Ramon in 1840 and sold to Juana Briones de Miranda in 1844 for the sum of $300; and Rancho San Antonio, 4,438 acres granted to Juan Prado Mesa. Adobe Creek was the boundary line of the two ranchos. The Briones and Mesa families were friendly and became related when two of the Mesa men married two of the Briones women.

In 1855 Juana Briones sold 3,000 acres to Martin Murphy, founder of the City of Sunnyvale, who had previously leased her land for cattle grazing. Murphy gave 2,800 acres to his daughter, Elizabeth Yuba, when she married William Taaffe, a prosperous San Francisco merchant. They built a home on what is now the Foothill Community College campus and had four children: William, Martin, and twin daughters Mary and Mathilda. Some of the Taaffe descendants still reside in Los Altos Hills. The two large ranchos were eventually parceled and sold as smaller ranches for cattle grazing and vineyards, mostly of Zinfandel grapes. Many Italian and French vintners lived on Purissima Road until a blight destroyed the vineyards near the turn of the century. Soon after, orchards of apricots, plums and prunes flourished.

With its millions of fruit trees producing a beautiful, aromatic sea of blossoms, Santa Clara Valley became the "Valley of Heart's Delight" and so it remained well into the 1960s. Trains and tour buses brought countless travelers from near and far to glimpse this unique panorama.

Los Altos Hills was incorporated as a general law city on January 27, 1956 with the name “The Town of Los Altos Hills.” Before then, residential development was constrained by numerous factors, including lack of a dependable water supply. Water from wells and creek beds was safe, but not always adequate.

Headwaters for Hale, Adobe, Barron, Matadero, Purissima, and Deer Creeks are generated in local foothills characterized by heavily wooded banks and often-impenetrable areas of poison oak and chaparral. Homes and farms were usually on large acreage. The overall personality of the region was distinctly rural.

After World War II, the pressures of a growing population and increasing urbanization were felt throughout the San Francisco Peninsula. Many members of the unincorporated Los Altos Hills community viewed local commercialism as undesirable and felt threatened by possible annexation by neighboring cities. When adjacent Los Altos incorporated in 1952 with a one-quarter-acre minimum lot size, residents of the Hills knew they had to take action to defend and preserve the amenities of their rural life, such as one-acre lots and the right to keep horses on private property.

The compelling reasons for the incorporation of Los Altos Hills were printed on green paper and distributed to residents in the fall of 1955. As stated in this document (referred to as the “Green Sheets”) one of the primary reasons the founders of the Town originally decided to incorporate in 1956 was to maintain the rural character of the community. This desire continues today.

In 2016 the Town celebrated its 60th anniversary. To commemorate the occasion the Town distributed a History Anthology. A time capsule was dedicated in 2016 and is to be opened on the Town's 75th anniversary in 2031.

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-3
Wealthy San Franciscans attracted to the area during this period built summer estates in Los Altos Hills.

Among the many still standing are: The Shumate House on Viscaino, the Lohman and Griffin Houses on the Foothill College campus, the Morgan Manor (which for many years was operated as Ford Country Day School) on Stonebrook, and the Finn Mansion on Prospect. Both Morgan Manor and Griffin House are official Town Historical Landmarks.
• Climate—Los Altos Hills receives 37 inches of rain per year and 1 inch of snowfall. The average US city receives 37 inches and 25 inches, respectively. The number of days with any measurable precipitation is

69. On average, there are 263 sunny days per year in Los Altos Hills, California. The July high is around 78 degrees. The January low is 39 degrees. The Best Places comfort index, which is based on humidity during the hot months, is rated as 53 out of 100, where higher is more comfortable. The US average on the comfort index is 44.
• Governing Body Format—Los Altos Hills was incorporated as a general law city on January 27, 1956 with the name “The Town of Los Altos Hills.” The Town of Los Altos Hills is governed by a fivemember city council. The Town consists of six departments: City Manager, City Clerk, Building, Emergency Services, Engineering & Public Works, Finance & Administrative Services, Municipal Code, Planning and Parks & Recreation. The City Manager has administrative responsibility and authority to ensure that the laws and ordinances of the Town are duly enforced. He is responsible for managing and giving direction to all department heads except the City Attorney. The City Manager is appointed by, and serves at the pleasure of, the City Council.

Major responsibilities of the City Manager are as follows:

Ø Represents the Town with other governmental agencies
Ø Recommends adoption of ordinances and resolutions to execute the City Council's policies Ø Advises the City Council of the fiscal condition of the Town Ø Prepares an annual budget and Capital Improvement Plan Ø Exercises general supervision over all public buildings, parks, and other public properties under the control of the Town
Ø Appoints or removes employees of the Town.

The Town contracts police services with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office. Fire services are provided by the Los Altos Hills County Fire District who hires the Santa Clara County Fire Department to perform fire department services. The Town has 16 committees and commissions that report to the City Council. The City Council assumes responsibility for adoption of this plan, the City Manager will oversee its implementation.
• Development Trends— The guiding principle of the Land Use Element, as with other parts of the General Plan, is to address long-term needs while preserving the semi-rural character of the community and the overall quality of life for residents of Los Altos Hills. While many changes have taken place in the intervening years, most of the pleasant country aspects of the Town remain as new housing is constructed to accommodate the needs and lifestyles of today's residents.

There are no commercial or industrial uses within the Town limits. As the Town has developed over the past 50 years, residents have continued to support the preservation of low-density residential development and the semi-rural character of the community through one-acre zoning, the right to keep horses on private property, and the protection of open space, creek corridors, wildlife habitat and heritage oak trees.

With limited land available for additional housing and only slight possibility of change on non-residential parcels, Los Altos Hills is almost fully developed. However, in addition to infill development on vacant lots, redevelopment is occurring as existing residences are torn down and replaced with new homes. The

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-4
current trend is to develop residences that maximize the square footage allowed under floor area and development area regulations established by the Town’s Zoning Ordinance.

1.3 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT

1.3.1 Resources for the 2017 Planning Initiative
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for inclusion into the 2017 Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan for both Volume I and Volume II Los Altos Hills Annex. All of the below items were additionally reviewed as part of the full capability assessment for Los Altos Hills
• Los Altos Hills General Plan—The General Plan, including the Land Use and Safety Elements, were reviewed for information regarding goals and policies consistent with hazard mitigation for carry over as goals and objectives.
• Los Altos Hills Municipal Code—The Municipal Code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program.
• Capital Improvements Plan—The Capital Improvements Plan was reviewed to identify cross-planning initiatives for inclusion as mitigation projects.
• Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan March 19, 2014—The LHMP was used to develop the community profile portions of the plan and to compare strategies and information against current data. • Technical Reports and Information—Outside resources and references used to complete the Los Altos Hills Annex are identified in 1.10 of this annex.

1.3.2 Full Capability Assessment
An assessment of legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 1-1. An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 1-2. An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 1-3.

Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 1-4. An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 1-5. Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 1-6. Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 1-7, and the community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 1-8.

Table 1-1. Legal and Regulatory Capability
Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority State Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Muni Code Title 8 & 2016 California Building Code Zoning Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Muni Code Title 10
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act Division 2, Chapter 7.5 2621 Public Resources Code Subdivisions Yes No Yes No
Comment: Muni Code Title 9 & Subdivision Map Act Govt Code 66410-66413.5 Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: Muni Code Title 9, 10
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order 01-119, State Waste Discharge Requirements, Clean Water Act

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-5
Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority State Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Post-Disaster Recovery No No No Yes
Comment: None Identified
Real Estate Disclosure No Yes Yes No
Comment: State of California Dept of Real Estate Disclosures in Real Property Transactions Cal. Civ. Code §1102 et seq. 2005 Natural Hazards, Earthquake Guides
Growth Management No No Yes No
Comment: Cal. Gov. Code §65300 et seq.

Site Plan Review Yes No No No
Comment: Muni Code Title 10 – 1 & 10-2
Environmental Protection Yes No Yes No
Comment: Various sections of Municipal Code and General Plan, California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code 21000–21189 and the CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000– 15387
Flood Damage Prevention Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Muni Code Title 7 Chapter 4, Department of Water Resources Emergency Management Yes No No Yes
Comment: Emergency Operations Plan 2009
Climate Change No No Yes Yes
Comment: California SB-32 and SN-379
Other: No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? Yes
Comment: Government Code 65300-65303.4; Town of Los Altos Hills General Plan Update 2007 Capital Improvement Plan Yes No No No
How often is the plan updated? Annually
Comment: 2016-2017 Operating &Capital Budget and Five-Year Capital Plan Floodplain or Watershed Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Santa Clara Valley Water District
Stormwater Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Los Altos Hills Sewer Management Plan 2016; Clean Water Act, County National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Urban Water Management Plan No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Habitat Conservation Plan No Yes No No
Comment: Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan
Economic Development Plan No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Community Wildfire Protection Plan No Yes No Yes
Comment: Town has not adopted Santa Clara County Draft Wildfire Protection Plan

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-6
Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority State Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Forest Management Plan No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Climate Action Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: Los Altos Hills Draft Climate Action Plan
Comprehensive Emergency Management
Plan
No Yes No Yes
Comment: Santa Clara County Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan, 2008 Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk
Assessment (THIRA)
No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Post-Disaster Recovery Plan No No No Yes
Comment: None Identified
Continuity of Operations Plan No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Public Health Plan No Yes No No
Comment: Santa Clara County
Other: No No No No
Comment: None Identified
Table 1-2. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants No
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes - subject to voter approval User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes - sewer Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes - subject to voter approval Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes -subject to voter approval Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas No
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes Other No
Table 1-3. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resources Available? Department/Agency/Position Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes Planning, Building, Public Works & Engineering / LAH Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes Building Dept / LAH
Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes Planning, Building, Public Works & Engineering / LAH
Staff with training in benefit/cost analysis Yes Finance / LAH / Director Surveyors No

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-7
Staff/Personnel Resources Available? Department/Agency/Position Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes Planning, Public Works & Engineering / LAH
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes City Manager/Los Altos Hills/Emergency Manager
Grant writers No
Table 1-4. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criteria Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works / City Engineer Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date of adoption of your flood damage prevention ordinance? November 17, 2001 • Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements?
May not meet minimum NFIP
requirements
• If exceeds, in what ways?
When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact? Unknown
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed? No
• If so, please state what they are.

Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes
• If no, please state why.

Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program? No
• If so, what type of assistance/training is needed?
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No • If yes, is your jurisdiction interested in improving CRS Classification? • Is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? No How many Flood Insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction? Reference https://bsa.nfipstat.fema.gov/reports/1011.htm#CAT 82a
What is the insurance in force? $24,837,300 a
What is the premium in force? $59,953 a
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction? Reference https://bsa.nfipstat.fema.gov/reports/1040.htm#06 13 a How many claims were closed without payment/are still open? 8 CWOP/ 0 Open a What were the total payments for losses? $31,535 a
a. According to FEMA statistics as of October 31, 2016
Table 1-5. Education and Outreach
Criteria Response
Do you have a Public Information Officer or
Communications Office? Yes
Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website
development? No

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-8
Criteria Response
Do you have hazard mitigation information available on
your website? Yes
• If yes, please briefly describe. Webpage listing links to documents, websites and videos explaining preparedness for natural and man made hazards.

Also provides documents explaining structural and no-structural hazard mitigation.

Do you utilize social media for hazard mitigation
education and outreach? Yes
• If yes, please briefly describe. Post information on Facebook, NextDoor, Twitter during emergencies and exercises
Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that
address issues related to hazard mitigation?
Yes - Environmental Design & Protection Committee,
Environmental Initiatives Committee
Do you have any other programs already in place that
could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes • If yes, please briefly describe. CERT volunteers, Town website, Town newsletter, Nextdoor.com, community events
Do you have any established warning systems for hazard
events? Yes
• If yes, please briefly describe. Reverse 9-1-1, local radio station, ham radio, Community Emergency Response Team
Table 1-6. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection (Alameda County Fire Department) No N/A N/A Storm Ready No N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Table 1-7. Development and Permit Capabilities
Criteria Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since the
development of the previous hazard mitigation plan?
Yes
• If yes, please include estimated land area annexed
and estimated number of parcels or structures.

Six properties on Mora Drive and Mora Glen Drive were
annexed in September 2016.

Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any areas during the performance period of this plan?
Yes
• If yes, please describe land areas and dominant
uses.

The Town intends to pursue annexation of most of the
remaining County islands that are within the Urban Service Area.
• If yes, who currently has permitting authority over
these areas?
County of Santa Clara
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
• If no, who does? If yes, which department? Building Department How many building permits were issued in your jurisdiction since the development of the previous hazard mitigation plan in 2014?
Type 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Single Family Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable 634 634 Multi-Family Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable 0 0

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-9
Criteria Response
Other (commercial,
mixed use, etc.)
Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable 0 0
Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area?
No
• If yes, please provide the number of permits for
each hazard area.
• Special Flood Hazard Areas- unknown
• Landslide- unknown
• High Liquefaction Areas- unknown
• Tsunami Inundation Area - unknown
• Wildfire Risk Areas - unknown
The Town is moving forward with the implementation of a new permit tracking software and once that is in place we will have the ability to track permits by these or similar categories. • If no, please provide a qualitative description of
where development has occurred in terms of
hazard risk areas.

The Town has a geologic hazards map and requires
geotechnical peer review for new residences. Until recently, many properties in Los Altos Hills were in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) area and therefore subject to building code and landscape restrictions related to fire prevention. The City Council rescinded the WUI map on October 20, 2016.

New residences and properties re-roofing a residence are still required to have class A roofing, and new residences and second units are required to have fire sprinkler systems.

Development has occurred throughout the Town during the performance period for this plan. For those hazards with impacts town-wide, it is safe to assume that this new
development could be subject to impacts from those hazards.

However, it is important to note that all new development was subject to the regulatory capabilities identified in this annex.

Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? No • If yes, please describe. N/A
• If no, please quantitatively describe the level of buildout in the jurisdiction.

The Town is close to being built out. Most new projects involve the demolition of an existing residence and
construction of a new (replacement) residence. A few
subdivisions are processed each year. In 2015 two two-lot subdivisions were approved. Pending subdivision applications include one for two lots and one for nine lots.

Are any areas targeted for development or major
redevelopment in the next five year?
No
• If yes, please describe. N/A
• If yes, are any of these areas located in known
hazard risk zones?
N/A
Table 1-8. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Adaptive Capacity Assessment Jurisdiction Rating
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Medium Comments/Additional Information: Climate Action Plan December 15, 2016 Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-10
Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory High Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Low Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Low Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes
Medium
Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts High Comments/Additional Information: Adopted Climate Action Plan December 15, 2016 Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Low
Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Champions for climate action in local government departments Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Public Capacity
Local residents knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Local residents support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided
Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comments/Additional Information: None provided

1.4 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER PLANNING INITIATIVES
The following describe the jurisdiction’s process for integrating the hazard mitigation plan into local planning mechanisms.

1.4.1 Existing Integration
The following plans and programs currently integrate the goals, risk assessment and/or recommendations of the hazard mitigation plan:
• Los Altos Hills General Plan—Mitigation Plan is an Annex to the General Plan.

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-11

1.4.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The following plans and programs do not currently integrate the goals, risk assessment and/or recommendations of the hazard mitigation plan, but provide an opportunity for future integration:
• Los Altos Hills General Plan—Plan will be reviewed to ensure alignment with the updated LHMP. • Los Altos Hills Municipal Code—Sections related to zoning and building codes will be reviewed to ensure alignment with LHMP.
• Community Wildfire Protection Plan—Santa Clara County Fire recently adopted the Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The plan included City annexes, which identify specific measures to reduce impacts from wildfires.
• Legal and Regulatory Capabilities—Those capabilities identified as providing an integration opportunity in Table 1-1 will be reviewed and updated to include information on hazard risk reduction as feasible and appropriate.

1.5 JURISDICTION-SPECIFIC NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY
Table 1-9 lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction.

Table 1-9. Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA Disaster #
(if applicable) Date Preliminary Damage Assessment
Winter Storm - Jan 7, 2017 $7,000
Fire (Stanford Dish) - June 25, 2007 The flames prompted a voluntary evacuation of homes in the area, but no structures were damaged
and no injuries to residents. The blaze, burned
about 125 acres
Flood - Jan 1, 2006 Not available
Flood 1203 Feb 2, 1998 Not available
Flood 1155 Dec 28, 1996 Not available
Winter Storm 1046 Feb 13, 1995 Not available
Winter Storm 1044 Jan 3, 1995 Not available
Severe Freeze 894 Dec 19, 1990 Not available
Earthquake (Loma Prieta) 845 Oct 17, 1989 Significant damage in Los Altos Hills, resulting in the demolition of 7 homes and necessitating
substantial repairs to more than 25 residential units.

Winter Storm 758 Feb 12, 1986 Not available
Wildfire (Liddicoat) 739 July 1,1985 $9,000,000 (2014 LHMP) A major fire set by an arsonist destroyed nine
homes in Los Altos Hills and damaged 16 others.

The fire spread rapidly, burning 200 acres.

The fire forced the evacuation of 195 residents, as
well as horses, sheep, and dogs. The American Red
Cross established a shelter at Gunn High School in
Palo Alto. Injuries were limited to smoke
inhalation, heat exhaustion and minor burns.

Earthquake 6.2 - March 24, 1984 Not available

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-12
Type of Event
FEMA Disaster #
(if applicable) Date Preliminary Damage Assessment
Storm/Flooding 677 Jan 21, 1983 In January 1983, both President Reagan and Governor Deukmejian declared Santa Clara
County a disaster area caused by major rainfall.

Major rainfall in March, 1983 caused flooding on
Edith Road and West Fremont Road. A series of
landslides closed Page Mill Road from Paseo del
Roble to Three Forks Road. There were numerous
slides on Viscaino Road from Concepcion to
Purissima. The rain-swollen Adobe Creek caused
erosion and landslides in the area of Foothill
College.

Winter Storm 651 Dec 19, 1981 Not available
Earthquake 5.8 - Jan. 27, 1980 Not available
Earthquake 5.9 - Jan. 24, 1980 Not available
Earthquake 5.9 - Aug. 6, 1979 Not available
Drought 3023 Jan 20, 1977 Not available
Earthquake 7.9 - April 18, 1907 Not available

1.6 JURISDICTION-SPECIFIC VULNERABILITIES
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0 Other noted vulnerabilities include the following:
• Although only approximately 1 percent of structures in the Town are in the 1 percent annual chance floodplain, almost 92 percent of the Town’s structures are believed to be located in the 0.2 percent annual chance flood hazard area.

1.7 HAZARD RISK RANKING
Table 1-10 presents the ranking of the hazards of concern.

Table 1-10. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Type Risk Rating Score (Probability x Impact) Category 1 Earthquake 48 High
2 Severe Weather 33 Medium
3 Wildfire 18 Medium
3 Flood 18 Medium
4 Landslide 15 Medium
5 Drought 9 Low
6 Dam and Levee Failure 0 Low

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-13

1.8 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN INITIATIVES
The status of previous actions from the 2014 LHMP for Los Altos Hills can be found in Appendix A of this Volume.

1.9 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN AND EVALUATION OF

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
Table 1-11 lists the actions that make up the Town of Los Altos Hills hazard mitigation action plan. Table 1-12 identifies the priority for each action. Table 1-13 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and the six mitigation types.

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-14
Table 1-11. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Applies to
new or
existing
assets
Hazards
Mitigated
Objectives
Met Lead Department
Estimated
Cost
Sources of
Funding Timeline
LAH-1—Create resources to assist neighbors in networking and having an emergency action plan.

Exiting Earthquake,
Flood, Wildfire
1, 2, 4, 5, 8,
9 OES*, CERT Low Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-2—Continue tree trimming programs, brush clearance, and other defensible space outreach efforts as necessary to minimize the potential for road blockage. Maintenance of brush and vegetative growth for fire prevention is addressed in Section 4-2.115 and 4-2.116 of the LAH Municipal Code
Existing Wildfire, Flood,
Severe Weather
1, 2, 4, 5, 6,
8 Public Works*,
LAHCFD
Medium Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-3—Develop and enhance public education and outreach materials for all hazards with emphasis on high risk ratings.

Existing All Hazards 1, 2, 4, 8, 9 OES Low Staff Time, General Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-4—Prepare a comprehensive evacuation plan focusing on potential wildland fire threats and identifying potential evacuation routes.

Existing Earthquake,
Wildfire, Flood,
Landslide
1-6, 8, 9 OES*, Sheriff, Fire Low Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-5—Participate in County organized efforts to implement a countywide Community Wildfire Protection Plan.

Existing Wildfire 1-9 County OES*, LAH
OES
Low Staff Time, General
Fund, HMPG
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-6—Evaluate options and resources available to support home owners in completing seismic retrofits.

Existing Earthquake 1-6, 8 Planning Low Staff Time, General Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-7—Coordinate with the appropriate state and county agencies to develop a comprehensive list of bridges and overpasses within Los Altos Hills and who is responsible for their maintenance.

Existing Earthquake,
Flood, Landslide
1, 2, 4, 5, 8 Public Works Low Staff Time, General
Fund, HMGP
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-8—Where appropriate, support retro-fitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in high hazard areas.

Existing Earthquake,
Wildfire, Flood
1-6, 8 Planning High HMGP, PDM, FMA,
Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-9—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions within the community such as Municipal Code.

New and
Existing
All Hazards 1-4,8 Planning Low Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-10—Develop and implement a program to capture perishable data after significant events (e.g. high water marks, preliminary damage estimates, damage photos, total losses, successes, lessons learned) to support future mitigation efforts including the implementation and maintenance of the hazard mitigation plan.

Existing All Hazards 1-4 OES Low Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-11—Support the Countywide initiatives identified in Volume 1 of the hazard mitigation plan Existing All Hazards 1-9 Planning Low Staff Time, General Fund
On-going
LAH-12—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of the hazard mitigation plan Existing All Hazards 1-6 OES Low Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-15
LAH-13—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). This will be accomplished through the implementation of floodplain management programs that will, at a minimum, meet the requirements of the NFIP:
• Enforcement of the flood damage prevention ordinance. • Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

New and
Existing
Flood 1-5 Planning High Staff Time, General
Fund , HMGP
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-14—Participate in the development of a countywide post-disaster recovery plan and a debris management plan Existing Earthquake,
Flood, Landslide
2, 3, 5, 6, 8 OES, Finance, Public
Works
High Staff Time, General
Fund, HMGP
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-15—Consider participation in programs such as Firewise, StormReady and the Community Rating System Existing Wildfire, Flood,
Severe Weather
1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
8 LAHCFD, Public
Works, Planning
High Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-16—Complete Matadero Creek Erosion Control Project
Existing Flood 1-6 Public Works Low Staff Time, General Fund, HMGP, PDM,

FMA, SCVWD
Matching Grant
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-17—Complete Barron Creek restoration joint project with private property owner.

Existing Flood 1-6 Public Works Low Staff Time, General Fund , HMGP, PDM,

FMA, SCVWD
Matching Grant
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-18—Complete open space vegetation restoration project.

Existing Earthquake,
Landslide
1-6 Public Works Low Staff Time, General
Funds

HMGP, PDM
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-19—Continue offering Personal Emergency Preparedness and Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training to the community.

Existing Earthquake,
Wildfire, Flood
1, 2, 4, 8, 9 LAHCFD*, OES Low Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
LAH-20— Create and maintain a pathways inventory for alternate evacuation routes.

Existing Earthquake,
Wildfire, Flood
2, 3, 4 Planning Low
Staff Time, General
Fund
1-5 yrs
(Short-term)
* — Indicates lead agency
Table 1-12. Mitigation Strategy Priority Schedule
Action #
# of
Objective
s Met Benefits Costs
Do
Benefits
Equal or
Exceed
Costs?
Is Project
GrantEligible?
Can Project
Be Funded
Under
Existing
Programs/
Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
LAH-1 6 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-2 6 Medium Medium Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-3 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-4 8 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-16
LAH-5 9 Medium Low Yes Yes No Medium Med
LAH-6 7 High Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-7 5 Medium Low Yes Yes No Medium Med
LAH-8 7 High High Yes Yes Yes High High
LAH-9 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-10 4 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-11 9 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-12 6 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-13 5 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
LAH-14 5 Medium High No Yes No Medium High
LAH-15 6 Medium High No No No Low Low
LAH-16 6 High Low Yes Yes Yes High High
LAH-17 6 High Low Yes Yes Yes High High
LAH-18 6 High Low Yes Yes Yes High High
LAH-19 5 High Low Yes No Yes High Low
LAH-20 3 High Low Yes No Yes High Low
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Table 1-13. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type

1. Prevention

2. Property
Protection

3. Public
Education
and
Awareness

4. Natural
Resource
Protection

5. Emergency
Services

6. Structural
Projects

7. Climate
Resilient
Earthquake LAH-1,
LAH-3,
LAH-6,
LAH-8,
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-6, LAH7, LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-19
LAH-1, LAH3, LAH-4,
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-19,
LAH-20
LAH-14 LAH-4
Severe
Weather
LAH-2,
LAH-3,
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-15
LAH-10,
LAH-19
LAH-3, LAH10, LAH-12,
LAH-15,
LAH-19
LAH-14
Wildfire LAH- 1,
LAH-2,
LAH-3,
LAH-5,
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-15
LAH-5, LAH10, LAH-12,
LAH-15,
LAH-19
LAH-1, LAH3, LAH-4,
LAH-5, LAH10, LAH-12,
LAH-16,
LAH-19,
LAH-20
LAH-9,
LAH-12,
LAH-14,
LAH-18
LAH-4

Los Altos Hills Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 3/8/17
1-17
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type

1. Prevention

2. Property
Protection

3. Public
Education
and
Awareness

4. Natural
Resource
Protection

5. Emergency
Services

6. Structural
Projects

7. Climate
Resilient
Flood LAH-1,
LAH-2,3
LAH-8,
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-11,
LAH-12,
LAH-13,
LAH-15
LAH-7, LAH9, LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-13,
LAH-15,
LAH-20
LAH-1, LAH3, LAH-4,
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-13,
LAH-15,
LAH-19,
LAH-20
LAH-9,
LAH-12,
LAH-13,
LAH-14,
LAH-16,
LAH-17,
LAH-18
LAH-4
Landslide LAH-3,
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-11,
LAH-12
LAH-7, LAH10LAH-3, LAH4, LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-19,
LAH-20
LAH-14,
LAH-16,
LAH-17,
LAH-18
LAH-4
Drought LAH-3,
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-11,
LAH-12
LAH-10,
LAH-12,
LAH-19
LAH-3, LAH10, LAH-12,
LAH-19
LAH-9,
LAH-12
Dam and
Levee Failure
LAH-9,
LAH-10,
LAH-11,
LAH-12
LAH-9, LAH10,LAH-3 LAH-9,
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types.

1.10 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
The hazard mitigation plan annex development tool-kit was used in the development of this annex to the Santa Clara Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Los Altos Hills
Wildfire Haxard Mitigation Finacial Model
Second and third years perform work, inspect and certify Recovery California Wildfire Mitigation Program
Phase 1 |‐‐‐‐‐‐Phase 2‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐|
Expense Categories Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
Wildfire Mitigation Program Manager Salary & Benefits 180,000 189,000 198,450 567,450 Advertising 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
Program Development‐ materials 20,000 20,000
Website Development 10,000 10,000
Home & Defeable Soace Assessment and Inspection 20,000 4,000 4,000 28,000 Vendor Qualifying (Roof and Defensible Soace) 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 Legal 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
Accounting 2,500 5,000 5,000 12,500
Other expenses‐  5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000
Environmental and Historical Preservation SME  20,000 20,000 40,000 $500/ home Roof Replaxement Expense 900,000 900,000 1,800,000
Defensible Space Expense 50,000 50,000 100,000
Total Cost 282,500 1,198,000 1,187,450 2,667,950
Phase Totals 282,500 2,385,450 2,667,950
Summary Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
Homeowner Payments Roof 0 225,000 225,000 450,000
Homeowner Payments Defensible Space 0 12,500 12,500 25,000 Town Cash and inkind match 70,625 63,393 62,697 196,715 Town and Homeowner Match 70,625 300,893 300,197 671,715 CAL OES Grant income 211,875 897,107 887,253 1,996,235
Total Income 282,500 1,198,000 1,187,450 2,667,950
CAL OES Grant Percentage Share 75% 75% 75% 75%
Town will offer phased program. First year develop program and find and qualify 30 woodshake roof replacements and 50 defensible space participants (some are both) Program will be modeled after Cal OES/CAL FIRE community home hardening program to retrofit, harden, and create defensible space for homes at high risk to wildfires w/o LMI limitation
Hope to leverage the tools and lessons learned from this program and apply them to increase the number of hardened homes and strengthen community resilience to wildfires
Reponding to the call, "Non‐demonstration communities that are interested in developing a local home hardening program are encouraged to apply through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program."
Attachment 3

Assumptions Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Number of homes inspected 100 40 40
Inpection cost per home  200 100 100
Total inspection costs 20000 4000 4000
Number of Roof retrofits 15 15
Cost per home 60000 60000
Total Retrofit Cost 900000 900000
Property owner share  0.25 225000 225000
Number of Defensible Spaces Created 25 25
Cost per home 2000 2000
Total Defensible Space Mitigation Cost 50000 50000
Property owner share  0.25 12500 12500

Hazard Mitigation
Assistance Guidance
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program, and Flood Mitigation Assistance Program
February 27, 2015
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Department of Homeland Security
500 C Street, S.W.

Washington, DC 20472
Attachment 4

Titles of Opportunities:
♦ Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
♦ Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program
♦ Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program
Funding Opportunity Numbers:

The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numbers for the three Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) programs are:
♦ 97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
♦ 97.047 Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program
♦ 97.029 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program
Federal Agency Name:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Announcement Type:

Initial

STATEMENT FROM THE DEPUTY

ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR

MITIGATION
I recognize and embrace the opportunity to align our programs to the 2014–2018 FEMA Strategic Plan and Whole Community approach to resiliency. To achieve this aim, I am pleased to share with you the Fiscal Year 2015 (FY15) Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Guidance.

This updated guidance is an essential instrument for our internal and external stakeholders. It carefully outlines strategies for the mitigation process by interpreting the Federal statutes, regulations, and best practices. This update is a collaborative effort of my staff, with input from external stakeholders.

We revised the HMA Guidance with an eye toward creating more programmatic flexibility.

Some of the major adjustments are:
♦ Integrating climate change / resilience considerations ♦ Simplifying Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) requirements (e.g., Hurricane Residential Wind Retrofit BCA)
♦ Linking the implementation of disaster-resistant building codes to projects funded under the Additional HMGP 5 Percent initiative
In addition to the changes listed above, we developed HMA Job Aids to enhance the fiscal processes and outreach materials for homeowners and federally-recognized tribes to better serve their needs. Lastly, we have incorporated provisions to promote accessibility as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

The FY15 HMA Guidance is the definitive policy document for the Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration (FIMA) and it is my expectation that this document be treated as FIMA’s official position on HMA-related matters.

The FY15 HMA Guidance will help move communities towards a more resilient future. Let us continue to work together to make the HMA programs the best they can be.

Roy E. Wright
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration

CONTENTS
Part I. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 A. HMA Commitment to Resilience and Climate Change Adaptation................................... 2 B. Authorization and Appropriation ........................................................................................ 4 B.1 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program ..............................................................................4 B.2 Pre-Disaster Mitigation ..............................................................................................4 B.3 Flood Mitigation Assistance .......................................................................................5 C. Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 5 D. HMA Application Process .................................................................................................. 6 E. Organization of this Document ........................................................................................... 7 F. Programmatic Changes....................................................................................................... 8 Part II. Frontloading HMA Program Eligibility Requirements ........................................ 13 A. Mitigation Planning .......................................................................................................... 15 B. Climate Change and Resiliency Considerations ............................................................... 16 C. Universal Accessibility and Mitigation ............................................................................ 16 D. Technical Feasibility and Effectiveness............................................................................ 17 E. Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands ....................................................... 17 F. Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation Review and Compliance .................. 18 G. Cost-Effectiveness ............................................................................................................ 21 H. Cost Review...................................................................................................................... 21 I. Project Development......................................................................................................... 21 J. Section 404 and Section 406 ............................................................................................. 22 K. Advance Assistance .......................................................................................................... 22 L. Strategic Funds Management............................................................................................ 23 M. Project Monitoring ............................................................................................................ 23 N. Closeout ............................................................................................................................ 24 Part III. Eligibility Information .............................................................................................. 25 A. Eligible Applicants............................................................................................................ 25 B. Eligible Subapplicants ...................................................................................................... 25 C. Cost Sharing ...................................................................................................................... 26 C.1 Federal Funds Allowed to Be Used as Non-Federal Cost Share ..............................28 C.2 Increased Cost of Compliance as Non-Federal Cost Share ......................................28 C.2.1 Steps for the Assignment of Coverage D – Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage ................................................................................. 29 D. Restrictions ....................................................................................................................... 30 i

D.1 Non-discrimination Compliance ..............................................................................30 D.2 Conflict of Interest ...................................................................................................30 D.3 Procurement .............................................................................................................31 D.4 Duplication of Programs ..........................................................................................31 D.5 Duplication of Benefits ............................................................................................31 E. General Program Requirements........................................................................................ 32 E.1 Eligible Activities.....................................................................................................32 E.1.1 Mitigation Projects...................................................................................... 34 E.1.2 Ineligible Stand-Alone Activities................................................................ 38 E.1.3 Hazard Mitigation Planning ........................................................................ 39 E.1.4 Technical Assistance ................................................................................... 40 E.1.5 Management Costs...................................................................................... 41 E.2 Ineligible Activities..................................................................................................42 E.3 Cost-Effectiveness....................................................................................................44 E.4 Feasibility and Effectiveness....................................................................................44 E.5 Hazard Mitigation Plan Requirement.......................................................................44 E.5.1 Applicant Mitigation Plan Requirement ..................................................... 45 E.5.2 Subapplicant Mitigation Plan Requirement ................................................ 45 E.5.3 Extraordinary Circumstances...................................................................... 45 E.5.4 Tribal Hazard Mitigation Plan Requirement............................................... 46 E.5.5 Conformance with Hazard Mitigation Plans............................................... 47 E.6 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation Requirements..........................47 E.6.1 Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands................................. 48 E.7 National Flood Insurance Program Eligibility Requirements..................................49 E.7.1 Special Flood Hazard Area Requirements.................................................. 49 E.8 Statutory, Regulatory, and Other Requirements ......................................................50 Part IV. Application and Submission Information............................................................... 52 A. Address to Request Application Package ......................................................................... 52 B. Content and Form of Application ..................................................................................... 52 C. Submission Dates and Times............................................................................................ 53 D. Intergovernmental Review................................................................................................ 53 E. Funding Restrictions......................................................................................................... 53 E.1 HMGP Funding Restrictions....................................................................................53 E.2 PDM Funding Restrictions.......................................................................................54 E.3 FMA Funding Restrictions.......................................................................................54 E.4 Management Costs Funding Restrictions.................................................................54 F. Other Submission Requirements....................................................................................... 55 ii

F.1 Application Consideration under Multiple HMA Programs....................................55 F.2 Pre-award Costs........................................................................................................55 G. Applicant Guidance .......................................................................................................... 56 G.1 General Applicant Guidance ....................................................................................56 G.2 Minimum Eligibility Criteria ...................................................................................56 H. Scoping Narrative: Scope of Work, Schedule, and Cost Estimate ................................... 58 H.1 Required Components..............................................................................................58 H.2 Considerations for Management Costs ....................................................................60 H.2.1 Activities Description.................................................................................. 60 H.2.2 Personnel ..................................................................................................... 60 H.2.3 Cost Estimate............................................................................................... 60 H.3 Considerations for Planning Subapplications ..........................................................60 H.3.1 Activities Description.................................................................................. 60 H.3.2 Deliverables, Tasks, and Schedule.............................................................. 61 H.4 Considerations for Project Subapplications .............................................................63 H.4.1 Property Location........................................................................................ 63 H.4.2 Activities Description.................................................................................. 63 H.4.3 Cost Estimate............................................................................................... 64 I. Cost-Effectiveness ............................................................................................................ 64 I.1 Substantial Damage Waiver.....................................................................................65 I.2 Aggregation..............................................................................................................65 I.3 5 Percent Initiative ...................................................................................................65 I.4 Pre-calculated Benefits (Safe Rooms)......................................................................65 I.5 Greatest Savings to the Fund....................................................................................65 I.6 Environmental Benefits............................................................................................66 I.7 Pre-calculated Benefits for Acquisitions and Elevations in Special Flood Hazard Areas............................................................................................................66 I.8 Integrating Sea Level Rise in Mitigation .................................................................67 I.9 Landslide Property Acquisition................................................................................68 I.10 Pre-calculated Benefits for Residential Hurricane Wind Retrofit Measures ...........68 I.11 Alternative BCA Methodologies..............................................................................69 J. Feasibility and Effectiveness Documentation................................................................... 70 K. Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation Documentation ................................ 70 Part V. Application Review Information ............................................................................. 74 A. Review Criteria ................................................................................................................. 74 A.1 Application Eligibility Review.................................................................................74 A.2 Technical Review.....................................................................................................74 iii

A.2.1 Cost-Effectiveness Review ......................................................................... 74 A.2.2 Feasibility and Effectiveness Review ......................................................... 75 A.2.3 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation Review....................... 75 A.3 HMA Efficiencies ....................................................................................................75 A.3.1 Safe Room Projects..................................................................................... 76 A.3.2 Wind Retrofit Projects................................................................................. 76 A.3.3 Certain Flood Mitigation Projects............................................................... 76 B. Selection and Notification Process ................................................................................... 76 B.1 Selection ...................................................................................................................77 B.2 Notification...............................................................................................................77 B.3 Reconsideration Process...........................................................................................77 B.3.1 Consideration of Additional Information.................................................... 78 C. Requests for Information .................................................................................................. 78 C.1 Request for Information Timelines..........................................................................78 Part VI. Award Administration Information........................................................................ 81 A. Notice of Award................................................................................................................ 81 B. Risk Assessment Prior to PDM and FMA Award ............................................................ 82 C. Requirements for Pass-Through Entities.......................................................................... 82 C.1 Termination ..............................................................................................................83 C.1.1 Additional Specific Award Conditions or Terminations in the PDM and FMA Programs..................................................................................... 83 D. Administrative and National Policy Requirements........................................................... 84 D.1 Cost-Share Documentation ......................................................................................84 D.2 Scope of Work Changes...........................................................................................84 D.3 Budget Changes........................................................................................................85 D.3.1 Non-construction Projects........................................................................... 85 D.3.2 Construction Projects .................................................................................. 85 D.3.3 Cost Overruns and Underruns..................................................................... 85 D.3.4 Contingencies.............................................................................................. 85 D.4 Program Period of Performance...............................................................................86 D.4.1 Extensions ................................................................................................... 86 D.5 Requests for Advances and Reimbursements ..........................................................87 D.6 Program Income .......................................................................................................87 D.7 Federal Income Tax on Mitigation Project Funds....................................................87 D.8 Remedies for Noncompliance ..................................................................................88 D.9 Davis-Bacon Act ......................................................................................................88 E. Reporting Requirements ................................................................................................... 88 iv