Los Altos Hills City Council
June 16, 2022

Exhibit A Page 5
Planning Commission has the authority to approve the Zoning Permit with conditions deemed necessary and reasonable at its discretion.
ii. The Conditions of Approval imposed for the Zoning Permit on March 3, 2022 were reasonable and necessary for the proposed project and to achieve the purposes of the Fence Ordinance and the Municipal Code, and thus were within the Planning Commission’s discretion to impose.

The subject property is an approximately 41-acre remainder parcel created in 1985. Access to the site is provided by a driveway off Elena Road and the driveway provides access to an existing residence at 28001 Elena Road. Portions of the northwesterly part of the property features slopes in excess of 30% and consists of steep topography. The northwesterly corner of the subject property is also within an Open Space Conservation Area as shown on the Town’s Land Use Diagram. The entire property is encompassed within a Williamson Act contract, which restricts the property to certain agricultural and related compatible uses as specified in the contract document. Based on the application submittals, the applicant has stated that it intends to utilize the property for agricultural purposes and the planting of crops. The applicant has stated that the proposed new fences are to protect the plantings but they do not seek to construct any additional structures on the parcel. An application for a Zoning Permit was filed pursuant to Section 10-1.507 as such a permit is required in order to construct new fences.

When the Zoning Permit application was considered by the Town during a Site Development Public Hearing on July 6, 2021, there were several public comments raising issues relating to respecting property boundaries, permitting wildlife movements through the property, preserving the Open Space Conservation Area portion that is located on the project site, and reviewing the proposed chain-link fence design. Upon the Zoning Permit application being referred to the Planning Commission on August 5, 2021, the Commission requested clarification on a number of items including: proposed agricultural uses, type of fencing, presence of wildlife activities, and other issues raised by public comments at the prior public hearing. As documented in the staff report to the Planning Commission, the Commission directed the applicant to consider certain modifications to the fence design and provide additional clarification on these items.

Subsequently, the Planning Commission made specific requests at the October 2021 and January 2022 hearings for the applicant to: (1) submit a revised site plan that accurately depicts the proposed fencing and gates, existing fencing, easements encumbering the subject property, contour lines/topography, and neighboring property lines; (2) to provide further details on the proposed fencing plan including clarification on fencing proposed for the northern boundaries of the project site, as well as the agricultural use(s) and area(s) necessitating the proposed fencing; (3) utilize wildlife friendly and wooden fences and use fencing configurations consistent with other similarly large properties with open space or agricultural uses; (4) confirm the proposed fences would not bisect pathway easements, waterways, or across any swales, and that new fencing would not preclude the dedication of future open space easements or pathway easements; (5) remove prior fencing that were installed without permits or appropriate authorization from the Town; and (6) allow

Exhibit A Page 6
members of the Open Space Committee to visit the project site to determine wildlife presence.

Based on the reports and record of subsequent Planning Commission public hearings, the applicant did not comply with the Commission’s directives or supply information for most of these requests to answer the Commission’s questions. Instead, the applicant has maintained a position throughout the public hearings that the Commission’s requests were excessive for a zoning permit application and would be more appropriate for a site development permit review. For instance, in reviewing records for the October 7, 2021, January 13, 2022, and March 3, 2022 public hearings and correspondences from the applicant to the Town, the only additional submissions from the applicant to address the Planning Commission’s inquiries were a revised site plan and a topographical map on February 14, 2022. These submittals, however, remained inaccurate in that they showed the existing fence in wrong locations and the topographical map was from a previous subdivision dated 10-17-14. Likewise, the applicant has also refused to revise fencing designs to utilize wooden posts or wildlife friendly designs on the grounds that the request to revise design is excessive for a zoning permit application review. The applicant has also not confirmed the location of existing easements, waterways or swales on the site, and has not clarified where the proposed planting areas and crops would be located on the subject property. As shown in the public hearing records and correspondences to the Town, the applicant has similarly maintained that providing such information would be excessive for a zoning permit application, and is more appropriate for a site development permit review.

At the same time, the public hearing records and related submittals demonstrate that the conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Commission were warranted. Of the ten (10) conditions of approval issued on March 3, 2022, Condition Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 9 would require the proposed fencing be set back a certain distance, be constructed in accordance with approved plans, and not be located or interfere with any property lines, swales and various types of easements. Condition Nos. 2, 6, 7 and 8 would limit the design of the new fencing to be without spikes, sharpened edges, new lighting, barbed wire and electrified fences. Condition No. 2 would also require wooden posts to match the rural/agricultural character of the property. Condition No. 10 would require certain sections of the proposed fencing design to be constructed with wildlife friendly fence or chain link fence.

Based on a review of the record below, these conditions of approval were reasonably related to the project and necessary to achieve the goals contemplated by the Town’s Fence Ordinance and zoning/development standards. A stated goal under Section 10-1.507 for fence regulations is to “preserve the beauty and open rural quality of the Town while acknowledging that residents have the right to fence their properties in order to protect their children, contain their animals, and maintain privacy.” The design and location of new fencing is well within the Planning Commission’s authority to impose and is reasonably related to preserving property interests and maintain the Town’s rural/open space characteristics. Prohibiting proposed new fencing from locating within easement areas, swales and other private property interest areas are also reasonably related and necessary to allow the construction of fencing while preserving the use of private property and avoid intervention with natural site features.

Exhibit A Page 7
In reviewing the public hearing records and other evidence presented before the Commission and City Council, there are also ample evidence showing that conditions relating to wildlife-friendly fencing and preservation of natural appearances at the subject property were reasonable to address specific concerns raised to the Planning Commission during the public hearings. At the outset, a portion of the subject property is located within an Open Space Conservation Area as shown on the Town’s Land Use Diagram, and also contains steep sloped topography adjoining neighboring sites. There was testimony presented with respect to a 2006 potential wildlife movement corridor study conducted by Live Oak Associates showing the presence of wildlife movement at the subject property.

Additionally, multiple neighbors, Town committee members, and the commissioners have provided testimony or voiced concerns about the proposed fencing restricting or preventing wildlife movement on the property due to sighting of deer. Although the applicant never specified the location of proposed plantings or crops, the Commission discussed during the public hearing configurations of fencing that could both protect potential crops to be planted and allow wildlife to move through the perimeters of the subject parcel. This included examples of alternative configurations from properties located at Natoma Road and Robleda Road. Ultimately, the Commission made modifications to the fencing design to incorporate wildlife-friendly fences at various points of the subject property to allow wildlife to pass through the site. There is no additional evidence suggesting that such configuration would prevent the applicant from using the property for agricultural purposes. The applicant has not made additional showings despite being given multiple opportunities to do so.

The City Council notes that the height and setbacks of the proposed new fencing are compliant with standards set forth under the Fence Ordinance. However, such technical requirements are not the only considerations under the Municipal Code and zoning permits for fences are not issued in a ministerial manner. The Fence Ordinance was enacted to preserve the Town’s natural characteristics and rural features while recognizing private property owners’ ability to fence their properties. The Fence Ordinance and permit review ordinances specifically authorize the Planning Commission to approve zoning permits with reasonable conditions it deems necessary. Based on a review of the record below, the evidence and testimony received by the Commission and Council provide ample basis to determine that the March 3, 2022 Conditions of Approval were reasonable and necessary.

Thus, the City Council finds that the Conditions of Approval imposed for the Zoning Permit on March 3, 2022 were reasonable and necessary for the proposed project and to achieve the purposes of the Fence Ordinance and the Municipal Code, and thus were within the Planning Commission’s discretion to impose. The City Council further finds that there was substantial evidence in the record below to support the Planning Commission’s approval of the Zoning Permit application with the Conditions of Approval imposed on March 3, 2022.
5120482.1

From: Allie Kelleher
To: George Tyson; City Council
Cc: Bart Hechtman; Stephen D. Pahl; Asher Orion
Subject: re: Sea Landing LP Zoning Permit Application
Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 8:53:00 AM
Attachments: Letter + Petitition (00984178xA2093).pdf
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected].

Learn why this is important
Dear Mayor Tyson and City Town Council:

Please see the attached letter regarding the above referenced matter.

Thank you.

Allie Kelleher
Allie Kelleher (she/her)
Legal Assistant
Pahl & McCay, a Professional Law Corporation
225 West Santa Clara St., Suite 1500, San Jose, CA 95113 Main: (408) 286-5100 Direct: (408) 918-2826
Email: [email protected]
Santa Monica Office:
201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 550, Santa Monica, CA 90401 Main: (424) 217-1830
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments, is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.) Supplemental No. 1
AGENDA ITEM #4.K
Distributed 6/15/22

Advance Copy Via Email

1999 Harrison Street, 9th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
tel (510) 808-2000
fax (510) 444-1108
www.meyersnave.com

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO

MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 16, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steve Mattas, City Attorney
and Claire Lai, Assistant City Attorney
RE: Resolution No. 48-22 Supplemental Findings Regarding 28001 Elena Road Fence Project Appeal
This memo responds to the objections submitted by Mr. Pahl, counsel and representative for Sea Landing, LLP (“Applicant”), on June 14, 2022 regarding Resolution No. 48-22 approving supplemental findings. The City Council initially adopted Resolution No. 48- 22 on April 21, 2022. As the City Council will recall, the resolution included supplemental findings related to the City Council’s prior denial of the appeal by the Applicant from a Town Planning Commission decision approving a Zoning Permit for proposed fencing at 28001 Elena Road (“Project”). Mr. Pahl’s letter presents several arguments related to the Resolution 48-22 and the proposed reconsideration of that resolution at this meeting. He also attaches a draft Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Specific Performance and Inverse Condemnation. The memo sets forth responses to the issues raised in Mr. Pahl’s letter.

I. The Town properly exercised its discretion and followed proper procedure to review the Project, hear the appeal, and adopt the Supplemental Findings.

The Supplemental Findings are based on the record of proceedings below, for which the applicant was properly noticed and in which the applicant and its representatives fully participated. Specifically, the Zoning Permit application for the Project was filed on May 27, 2021. It was considered at a Site Development public hearing conducted by the Planning Director on July 6, 2021. Due to various comments received from the public regarding the proposed fence design, property boundary disputes, wildlife movements observed, and sloped features of the site, the matter was referred to the Planning Commission by the Planning Director pursuant to the authority under Los Altos Municipal Code Sections 10-1.507(e) and 10-2.1305(b). The Planning Commission conducted four duly noticed public hearings with respect to the Project on August 5, 2021, October 7, 2021, January 13, 2022, and ultimately on March 3, 2022 when it approved the Zoning Permit with certain conditions of approval. At

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO each hearing, the Applicant was provided ample opportunities to present evidence and respond to the commissioners’ questions. Upon receiving the Applicant’s appeal of the conditions of approval imposed, the Town timely calendared the appeal for the City Council’s consideration on April 21, 2022. The Applicant received notice and was provided the opportunity to and, in fact, did present its case at the appeal hearing.

In addition, adoption of the Supplemental Findings on May 25, 2022 was proper and within the City Council’s discretion. Contrary to the claims raised in Mr. Pahl’s correspondence, the Town did not “bring the appeal back” to the City Council at the May 25 meeting. Instead, the Council was within its authority to adopt findings to articulate the rationale of its decision. The Supplemental Findings were not based on any new information not already included in the record of proceedings below. Instead, they are comprised of evidence presented to the Planning Commission prior to and during the four public hearings, as well as the to the City Council prior to and during the appeal hearing. The Applicant fully participated in all of these proceedings and had ample opportunities to present its arguments to the Commission and Council. As evidenced by the fact that the Supplemental Findings were placed on the consent calendar, the Council did not engage in any new discussions or make any new decisions with respect to the appeal, nor did it deny the Applicant the opportunity to participate as the Applicant’s representatives had already presented their case during the appeal hearing. Therefore, the Supplemental Findings were within the Council’s discretion and were properly adopted.

The May 25, 2022 public meeting was legally noticed pursuant to the requirements of the California Brown Act (Gov. Code section 54950 et seq.). The meeting agenda was made publicly available on the Town’s website well in advance of the meeting. Reports and documents for the meeting, including the resolution and staff report prepared for the Supplemental Findings, were also published at the same time for public review. On May 28, 2022, counsel advised the Town that the Applicant did not receive notice of the May 25 meeting. Upon hearing that the Applicant did not receive specific notice of the May 25th meeting, the Town promptly placed the Supplemental Findings on the June 16, 2022 meeting agenda for the Council’s reconsideration. The June 16 meeting was properly noticed pursuant to the Brown Act and the Town separately delivered notice to the Applicant’s counsel. As such, the Town has provided ample opportunities for the Applicant to present evidence and make arguments with respect to the Project review, the appeal proceedings and the draft supplemental findings and the Applicant has provided further comments in in letter of June 14th.

II. The Town’s decisions with respect to the Project were supported by substantial evidence in the record and proper exercises of discretion. (1) Zoning Permits for fences are discretionary approvals and the Town has authority to impose reasonable conditions of approval.

Throughout the proceedings, the Applicant has continued to claim that the Town has only narrow authority to review a Zoning Permit for fencing. This argument contradicts the applicable codes and ordinances. Los Altos Hills Municipal Code section 10-1.507 (b) and (e)

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO require all fences to obtain either a Zoning Permit or a Site Development Permit and designate the Planning Director as the initial reviewing body for such permits. Section 10-2.1305 sets forth the requirements and procedures for the Planning Director’s review. The Director may refer, as pertinent here, a Zoning Permit application to the Planning Commission for review.

If referred, the Planning Commission may review and issue the permit “with such reasonable conditions as it deems necessary” to achieve the purposes of the underlying Muni Code chapter. The stated purposes of the Town’s fence regulations under section 10-1.507 are to “preserve the beauty and open rural quality of the Town while acknowledging that residents have the right to fence their properties in order to protect their children, contain their animals, and maintain privacy.”
In light of the foregoing rules, the text of the Municipal Code specifically provides the Planning Commission discretion to impose reasonable conditions on Zoning Permits for fences in order to serve the state purposes of the fence regulations. Nothing under the Town’s fence regulations suggest, as argued by the Applicant’s counsel, that the reviewing authority is limited to determining whether the objective development requirements have been met and issuing Zoning Permits in a ministerial manner. While the Applicant has persistently asserted that the Town does not have authority to request additional information and impose conditions on a Zoning Permit for fencing, such position is not supported by a plain reading of the Municipal Code.
(2) The requests for information and conditions imposed by the Planning Commission were reasonable and supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Additionally, the conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Commission were proper as they were based on the Commission’s understanding of the fencing proposal and its exercise of discretion to balance the Town’s fence regulation goals and the Applicant’s need to fence its property. At the outset, the Commission requested several clarification items that are reasonably related to evaluating a fence proposal (particularly considering the 42-acre size of the property, the partially sloped topography of the Project site, and the length of the fencing required). These items include:
• Submit revised site plan that accurately depicts the proposed fencing and gates, existing fencing, easements encumbering the subject property, contour lines/topography, and neighboring property lines;
• Provide additional details on the proposed fencing plan including clarification on fencing proposed for the northern boundaries of the project site, as well as the agricultural use(s) and area(s) necessitating the proposed fencing; • Utilize of wildlife friendly and wooden fences and use fencing configurations consistent with other similarly large properties with open space or agricultural uses; • Confirm the proposed fences would not bisect pathway easements, waterways, or across any swales, and that new fencing would not preclude the dedication of future open space easements or pathway easements;

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO • Remove prior fencing that were installed without permits or appropriate authorization from the Town; and
• Allow members of the Open Space Committee to visit the project site to determine wildlife presence.

Contrary to Applicant’s contention, these requests are reasonably related to confirm the proposed fencing locations, improve fence design in a rural, naturalistic site area, and avoid interference with real property interests. They are not items that are only relevant to a site development permit. The Planning Commission made it clear on the record that these requests were made to (1) obtain information that would assist commissioners with understanding the proposed plan; (2) to clarify existing ambiguities and inaccuracies on the submitted plans; and (3) to address concerns relating to wildlife and fence designs that were raised and brought the Project application before the Commission in the first place. The Commission also stated several times during the public hearing that it does not intend to impede the Project with these requests.

Likewise, the Commission-imposed conditions of approval were reasonably related to address deficiencies in the Project’s fencing design, location and other issues. As noted in the Supplemental Findings, of the ten conditions of approval issued by the Commission, Condition Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 9 would require the proposed fencing be set back a certain distance, be constructed in accordance with approved plans, and not be located or interfere with any property lines, swales and various types of easements. Condition Nos. 2, 6, 7 and 8 would limit the design of the new fencing to be without spikes, sharpened edges, new lighting, barbed wire and electrified fences. Condition No. 2 would also require wooden posts to match the rural/agricultural character of the property. Condition No. 10 would require certain sections of the proposed fencing design to be constructed with wildlife friendly fence or chain link fence. These conditions are supported by substantial evidence in the record, such as those illustrated below:
• A portion of the Project site is located within an Open Space Conservation Area as shown on the Town’s Land Use Diagram, and also contains steep sloped topography adjoining neighboring properties. The Town has a legitimate interest in preserving the aesthetic and open space quality of the subject property and the surrounding area. For instance, chain-link fence is not preferred fencing material given the natural, rural character of the property and Town staff accordingly recommended wooden posts and welded-wire fence.
• Public testimony from multiple neighbors and Town committee members have reported presence of wildlife movement including sighting of deer at the Project site. Similarly, there was testimony presented with respect to a 2006 potential wildlife movement corridor study conducted by Live Oak Associates showing the presence of wildlife movement at this site.
• There is public testimony from neighboring property owners, including legal counsel, asserting boundary disputes with the Applicant. There was testimony submitted expressing concerns for a gate that Applicant proposes to install within an ingress/egress easement that have the potential to obstruct access for neighboring

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO property owners. These issues remain unresolved and commissioners’ questions related thereto remain unanswered even by the March 3, 2022 hearing. • The Commission discussed wildlife friendly fencing types and configurations implemented by other similarly large properties with open space or agricultural uses such as the “Packard” approach of a 4.5’ tall wildlife friendly perimeter fence with taller interior fences around protected areas, the “Robleda” approach of perimeter fencing punctuated by wildlife permeable fencing, and the “Natoma” approach featuring clearly defined openings for wildlife corridors. The Commission engaged in this discussion with the intention to permit wildlife movements through the site while considering the Project’s agricultural proposals. • The Williamson Act contract covering the Project site restricts the property uses to commercial agriculture and other compatible uses including open space uses. The contract, which was provided to the Town and a part of the record, states that the contract provisions are not intended to limit or supersede the planning and zoning powers of the Town (Section 2, page 2 of 4) (emphasis added). The existence of the Williamson Act contract does not otherwise limit the Town’s authority to issue permits and impose conditions of approval that are reasonably related to achieve stated purposes.

In contrast, despite being given multiple opportunities to respond, the Applicant provided virtually no relevant responses to the Commission’s requests. In reviewing the record below, there is no evidence demonstrating that any of the issues raised by the Commission’s inquiries were resolved by the Applicant, nor were any of the wildlife or design concerns addressed. To illustrate:
• During the four public hearings, the only additional submissions from the Applicant to address the Planning Commission’s inquiries were a revised site plan and a topographical map on February 14, 2022. These submittals, however, remained inaccurate in that they showed the existing fence in wrong locations and the topographical map was from a previous subdivision dated 10-17-14. • The Applicant refused to revise fencing designs to utilize wooden posts or wildlife friendly designs on the grounds that the request to revise design is excessive and costly to maintain, and inappropriate for a Zoning Permit review. • The Applicant declined to confirm the location of existing easements, waterways or swales on the site, or to show that proposed fencing would not intersect such areas, claiming such confirmation is inappropriate for a Zoning Permit review. • The Applicant has not clarified where the proposed planting areas and crops would be located on the Project site, even though there is testimony indicating that portions of the subject property at the northern boundaries contain steep slopes. The Applicant provided no information as to how wildlife friendly perimeter fencing would impede it from engaging in commercial agricultural farming despite the Commission’s prior discussions on other similarly large properties with open space or agricultural uses being able to accommodate both purposes.

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO The letter submitted by Mr. Pahl argues that information in the Supplemental Findings includes speculations and false statements. However, as illustrated above, the findings are supported by specific testimony or discussions contained in the record. In contrast, the Applicant has continued to maintain that it did not have to respond to the Commission’s inquiries because they are outside the scope of a Zoning Permit review. The Applicant has not provided any evidence demonstrating the fencing proposal would not intersect with conservation or private easements, prevent wildlife movement, or intrude on the aesthetics and natural characteristics of the subject land that the Town aims to protect. As evidenced by the record, the public testimony and documents submitted by neighboring owners show that there are outstanding issues with respect to property boundaries, wildlife movements, and interference with existing easements. There were also questions with respect to the specific locations of the proposed fencing. Consequently, there is substantial evidence supporting the Planning Commission and Council decisions and no substantial evidence in support of the contrary.

Based on the foregoing, the conditions of the approval for the Project were supported by substantial evidence in the record and properly imposed within the Town’s discretion. The Town also amply afforded the Applicant opportunities to present evidence and make arguments to the reviewing body throughout the Project review and appeal process. Likewise, the adoption of the Supplemental Findings reflects evidence presented to the Council and were properly adopted.
c: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
Sofia Mangalam, Planning Director
5123651.1

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS

MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 16, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council
FROM: Sarina Revillar, Administrative Services Director RE: Approval for City Manager to Attend the 2022 ICMA Conference in Cleveland, Ohio September 18-21, 2022
The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) is the world’s leading association of professional city and county managers and other employees who serve local governments.

The ICMA Conference is scheduled to occur September 18-21, 2022 in Cleveland, Ohio. It offers educational, information-sharing and networking tools to ensure professionals of all backgrounds and career stages are plugged into the most innovative ideas and practical strategies needed to manage the challenges facing local governments. Also, the show will bring the local government community together for unparalleled leadership and professional development, networking, and best-in-class programming. It offers education sessions, impactful keynote speakers, a robust exhibit hall, and unique networking opportunities.

In accordance with the City Council’s policy governing use of public funds for travel (attached), the Town reimburses the City Manager for expenses incurred to attend conferences relevant to Town business. This includes airfare, long term parking, lodging and meals. Given that the conference is in Ohio, the airfare for this conference is projected to be higher than average airfare for in-state travel. Based on current airline prices, staff projects an airfare of up to $500 for a reasonably convenient flight.

Additionally, the City Manager’s contract provides the following:
“Professional Development. The TOWN supports professional development for PIRNEJAD.

The TOWN agrees that on a yearly basis during its budget process, the TOWN will consider whether or not to pay for travel and subsistence expenses of PIRNEJAD for professional and official travel, meeting, and other occasions to continue the professional development of PIRNEJAD, and to pursue necessary official functions for the TOWN. The professional and official travel contemplated by this Section 7 includes but is not limited to the International City/County Management Association (“ICMA”) Annual Conference, CalCities Annual Conference, CalCities City Manager’s Department, Santa Clara County City Managers Association meetings. . . “
AGENDA ITEM #4.L
S.R.

City Council Memorandum Page 2
Approval to Attend ICMA Conference
June 16, 2022
The FY 2022-23 budget includes $7,500 for training, travel, and meetings. With the City Council’s approval, the City Manager will be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred at the ICMA Annual Conference.

ATTACHMENT

1. Town of Los Altos Hills Expense and the Use of Public Resources Policy

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS

EXPENSE AND USE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES POLICY

POLICY STATEMENT
The Town of Los Altos Hills takes its stewardship over the use of its limited public resources seriously. Public resources should only be used when there is a substantial benefit to the Town, such as:
• The opportunity to discuss the community’s concerns with state and federal officials • Participating in regional, state and national organizations whose activities affect the Town
• Attending educational seminars designed to improve officials’ skill and information levels
• Promoting public service and morale by recognizing such service This policy provides guidance to elected and appointed officials on the use and expenditure of Town resources, as well as the standards against which those expenditures will be measured.

This policy supplements the definition of actual and necessary expenses for purposes of state laws relating to permissible uses of public resources and also supplements the definition of necessary and reasonable expenses for purposes of federal and state income tax laws. This policy also applies to any charges made to a Town credit card or cash advances.

AUTHORIZED EXPENSES
Town funds, equipment, supplies (including letterhead), titles, and staff time must only be used for authorized Town business. The following types of expenses generally constitute authorized expenses, as long as the other requirements of this policy are met:
• Communicating with representatives of regional, state and national government on Town-adopted policy positions
• Attending educational seminars designed to improve officials’ skill and information levels
• Participating in regional, state and national organizations whose activities affect the Town’s interests
• Recognizing services to the Town, for example thanking a volunteer, retiring elected official or long-time employee with a gift or celebration of nominal value and cost • Refreshments served at a working lunch authorized by a member of the City Counicl or the City Manager.
• Attending Town events
All other expenses require approval by the City Council.

Examples of personal expenses that the Town will not reimburse include, but are not limited to:
• The personal portion of any trip
• Political or charitable contributions or events
• Family (partner, children, pets) expenses when accompanying official on Town-related business
Attachment 1

Expense and Use of Public Resources Policy 2 City Council Adopted January 26, 2006 Revised January 24, 2008
• Entertainment expenses, including theater, movies (either in-room or at a theater), sporting events (including gym, massage and/or golf-related events) • Non-mileage personal automobile expenses, including repairs, traffic citations, insurance or gasoline
• Alcoholic beverages except as specifically authorized in advance by a member of the City Council for Town sponsored public events at public facilities. • Personal losses incurred while on Town business
Any questions regarding the propriety of a particular type of expense should be resolved by the City Manager before the expense is incurred.

STIPENDS
The stipend for City Councilmembers will be $250 per month. The stipend for Planning Commissioners will be $100 per month. Such stipends will be in addition to any reimbursement for meals, lodging, travel and expenses consistent with this policy.

COST CONTROL
To conserve Town resources and keep expenses within community standards for public officials, expenditures should adhere to the following guidelines while travelling on official Town business.

TRANSPORTATION
The most economical mode and class of transportation reasonably consistent with scheduling needs and cargo space requirements must be used, using the most direct and time-efficient route. In the event that a more expensive form or route is used, the cost borne by the Town will be limited to the cost of the most economical, direct, efficient and reasonable transportation form.

Automobile mileage is reimbursable at the Internal Revenue Service rates presently in effect. These rates are designed to compensate the driver for gasoline, insurance, maintenance and other expenses associated with operating the vehicle. The amount does not include bridge and road tolls, which are also reimbursable.

LODGING
Lodging costs will be reimbursed or paid for when travel on official Town business reasonably requires an overnight stay. If such lodging is in connection with a conference, lodging costs should not exceed the group rate published by the conference sponsor for the meeting in question. For overnight stays in other contexts, lodging costs will be reimbursements or payments will be limited to the per diem rate for lodging published by the Internal Revenue Service.

MEALS
Meal expenses and associated gratuities should be moderate, taking into account community standards and the prevailing restaurant costs of the area.

Expense and Use of Public Resources Policy 3 City Council Adopted January 26, 2006 Revised January 24, 2008

TELEPHONE/FAX/CELLULAR PHONES
Officials will be reimbursed for actual telephone and fax expenses incurred on Town business.

AIRPORT PARKING
Long-term parking should be used for travel exceeding 24 hours.

CASH ADVANCE POLICY
From time to time, it may be necessary for an official to request a cash advance to cover anticipated expenses while traveling or doing business on the Town’s behalf. Such request for an advance should be submitted to the Administrative Services Director seven days prior to the need for the advance and should include a description of the purpose, anticipated amount and date of the expenditure. Any unused advance must be returned to the Accountant/Office Manager within two business days of the official’s return, along with an expense report and receipts documenting how the advance was used in compliance with this expense policy.

CREDIT CARD USE POLICY
The ability to pay for the purchase of some goods or services such as conference registrations or lodging with a credit card provides an efficient means of payment. The City Council has approved the application for and use of a corporate credit card, to be administered by the City Manager with a total credit line not to exceed the City Manager’s expense authority. Purchases by credit card are subject to the same advance and subsequent approval processes as purchases made by check. The Town’s credit card may not be used for personal expenses, even if the official subsequently reimburses the Town.

EXPENSE REPORT CONTENT AND SUBMISSION DEADLINE
Expense reports must document that the expense in question met the requirements of this policy.

Officials must submit their expense reports within thirty days of an expense being incurred, accompanied by receipts documenting each expense. Restaurant receipts, in addition to any credit card receipts, are also part of the necessary documentation. Receipts for gratuities and tolls under $5.00 are not required. Inability to provide such documentation in a timely fashion may result in the expense being borne by the official.

AUDITS OF EXPENSE REPORTS
All expenses are subject to verification of compliance with this policy.

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Town officials should keep in mind that some expenditures may be subject to reporting under the Political Reform Act and other laws. All agency expenditures are public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.

Expense and Use of Public Resources Policy 4 City Council Adopted January 26, 2006 Revised January 24, 2008

VIOLATION OF THIS POLICY
Use of public resources or falsifying expense reports in violation of this policy may result in any or all of the following:
• Loss of reimbursement privileges
• A demand for restitution to the Town
• The Town’s reporting the expenses as income to the elected official to state and federal tax authorities
• Prosecution for misuse of public resources

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS June 16, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RECEIVE A REPORT ON METHODS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION ON

THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND

COMMUNITY SURVEY
FROM: Sarah Robustelli, Sr. Community Services Supervisor APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the City Council:
1) Receive reports from MIG and FlashVote on the comprehensive methods to gain the community's perspectives.
2) Request for Council to clarify deliverables for August: staff and the consultant's recommendations or just the raw data.
3) Direction on additional insights that may lead to clear direction on proceeding with the Town Hall addition/community space efforts.

BACKGROUND:

Community Facilities Needs Assessment
At the January 20, 2022, City Council meeting, the Council was asked to provide staff direction on whether to continue work on phase II of the Town Hall remodel project or proceed in another direction. After a discussion of the Council and receiving public comment, a motion to continue work on the project was not approved. Rather, the Council passed a motion to reconfigure the interior workspace of Town Hall and purchase furniture to accommodate staff needs (Minutes can be viewed in attachment 3).

Subsequently, at the January 25, 2022, City Council Priority Setting Session, Councilmember Tankha continued the discussion of community facilities space needs.

The Council approved a goal to establish an Ad Hoc Town Hall Committee to evaluate a 10-year plan on facility needs, staffing, Parks and Recreation programs, and space (attachment 4).

More specifically, this Ad Hoc Committee would look at options for a Town Hall addition, remodel, or expansion and work with the Ad Hoc Community Survey Committee to help conduct a Town-wide survey to understand residents' priorities. The Community Surveys will focus on the following:
o Indoor space needs include community and staff space for Town Hall facilities.

AGENDA ITEM #5.A
S.R.

P.P.

Staff Report Page 2
Community Facilities Needs Assessment Update
June 16, 2022
o Outdoor recreational needs such as additional and/or improved parks and amenities.
o Recreational activities and events
Following the February 17, 2022, City Council meeting, a motion was passed to form the Town Hall Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Mayor Tyson and Councilmember Schmidt, attachment 5.

At the March 17, 2022, City Council meeting, the staff brought forward a contract with a consultant to complete a Community Facilities Needs Assessment. Details about process and the consultant, MIG qualifications can be found in attachments 5 and 6.

Since the Ad Hoc Committee was formed, they have provided feedback and perspective on efforts related to this work that came out of the City Council Goal Setting Session. See Table 1 for a timeline of the progress.

Town Surveys
The City Council Community Survey Ad Hoc was initially formed at their February 2020 meeting. At that time, Councilmembers Tankha and Tyson were appointed. In 2020 the impetus for a survey centered around topics such as the need for a community park and undergrounding utilities.

Due to external factors such as the pandemic and limited bandwidth from staff to take on additional projects, the community survey was never conducted. In August 2021, the Ad Hoc changed to Councilmembers Tyson and Schmidt.

Since 2020, the Council has become aware of additional issues that would benefit to have the community’s opinion, such as the indoor and outdoor community space, including Town Hall office needs for staff. For this reason, the Council reaffirmed their commitment to conducting a community survey as one of their priorities for the 2022 calendar year. See Table 1 for a timeline of the progress.

With this direction from Council, staff went through an informal bidding process and engaged in a contract with FlashVote for an amount not to exceed $25,000 to do a series of short scientific community surveys to gain resident feedback on certain topics.

FlashVote has experience conducting short surveys in other municipalities to allow the Council to gauge how the community is feeling on certain topics. In preparation for the first survey, it was determined that these surveys would serve the efforts of the Community Facility Needs Assessment and the efforts were aligned to complement each other.

Dates Milestones
2/1/2022 Ad Hoc Community Survey Meeting
2/9/2022 Ad Hoc Community Survey Meeting
2/18/2022 Staff Meeting with FlashVote
2/22/2022 Ad Hoc Community Survey Meeting with FlashVote

Staff Report Page 3
Community Facilities Needs Assessment Update
June 16, 2022
3/4/2022 Postcard mailed to residents for sign up for Town Surveys 3/17/2022 City Council Approved MIG Contract for Community Facilities Needs Assessment
3/28/2022 First Survey Launched on Indoor Community Space 4/1/2022 Staff and FlashVote reviewed the first Survey Results 4/7/2022 Ad Hoc Community Survey Meeting with FlashVote review results
4/18/2022 FlashVote presented results at Parks and Recreation Committee 4/27/2022 Ad Hoc Town Hall Committee confirms MIG interview list 5/11/2022 Committee/Commission Agenda Requests: Community Facilities Needs Assessment
5/16/2022 Postcards mailed to residents for Community Conversations 5/18/2022 Community Conversations: Town Crier Ad
5/26/2022 Ad Hoc next steps for Town Surveys and Community Conversation/Engagement
5/31/2022 Community Conversation: Indoor and Outdoor Space Needs 6/5/2022 Outreach conducted at the Town Picnic
6/8/2022 Second Survey Launched on Outdoor Community Space Table 1
Approach to Community Engagement
MIG designed a community engagement effort that starts with a broad set of questions about the need for more, less, or different indoor and outdoor spaces. The process will assemble a comprehensive picture of community needs. The outcome of this process will be an easy-to-reference summary provided to City Council that can be used to inform future decisions.

This is a new and robust approach for Los Altos Hills, utilizing a variety of different opportunities to connect with community members, which include the following:
● Community member interviews
● Staff interviews
● Comparable City/Town benchmarking
● Committee and Commission input
● Individual online feedback
● Town Hall Meetings (2)
● Council updates and presentations
Approach to Town Surveys
In parallel, Town staff have been working with FlashVote to design scientific surveys. The Town sent a mailer to every household encouraging residents to participate in Town Surveys. This information was included in the Activity Guide, which was also mailed to

Staff Report Page 4
Community Facilities Needs Assessment Update
June 16, 2022
every home. There have been postings on Nextdoor, Facebook, Twitter, the City Manager’s weekly report, and the Town website. Outreach has been conducted at all Town events including the recent Town Picnic. Staff continues to make every effort to inform the Town about the upcoming Town surveys to broaden the survey sample. The Town wants to encourage all residents to continue to sign up to take subsequent surveys. To sign up, visit: www.Flashvote.com/LosAltosHills.

The surveys are open for 48 hours. The length of time has been highly tested to maximize responses while minimizing the wait time for results. Those who registered to take Town surveys received notifications and reminders until they take the survey, or the 48-hour window ended. The first of these surveys, launched at the end of March, which explored indoor community space needs. Two hundred and two (202) total participants took the Indoor Community Space survey. The second survey was launched at the beginning of June and explores outdoor community space needs. 184 total participants took the Outdoor Community Space survey. The results of the surveys are public for everyone to view:
http://losaltoshills.ca.gov/549/Town-Surveys
Noted in the timeline above on milestones, the Community Survey Ad Hoc Committee composed of Mayor Tyson and Councilmember Schmidt met with staff and FlashVote to review the results. On Monday, April 18, 2022, at the Parks and Recreation Committee FlashVote reviewed the first Town Survey results on Indoor Community Space as an informational item. A full timeline can be found in Table 1.

In order to provide a complete range of opinions and perspectives the efforts related to the Community Engagement lead by MIG and the survey efforts led by FlashVote were brought together. These multiple approaches will allow more residents the opportunity to provide their thoughts in the process. This will result in themes that represent a broader cross-section of the community.

The staff and consulting team have completed or initiated the following tasks; each activity listed includes a brief update on the number of participants. This report is to provide a progress summary:
● Community Member Interviews: 16 of 18 invites have resulted in completed interviews exploring backstory and deeper involvement. The consultant team is working on scheduling a final set of interviews to complete this task. ● Staff Interviews: Eight senior staff members provided their on-the-ground perspectives of the working environment for themselves and their team(s). ● The project team gathered and is analyzing square footage and details of working environments from five similar communities.
● Committee and Commission input: a toolkit produced by the consulting team is being used to meet with each of the 16 committees and commissions. So far, 8 of 16 are complete.
● Individual Online Feedback: Individual feedback is also being collected through an online form, allowing people to provide as little or as much input as they like.

This is a complement to other engagement activities

Staff Report Page 5
Community Facilities Needs Assessment Update
June 16, 2022
● Town Hall Meetings: One of the two scheduled Town Hall Meetings has been completed (on May 31, 2022) with 21 resident participants. This extended the opportunity to speak directly (via digital meeting) with neighbors and the project team. A second virtual opportunity is scheduled for Wednesday, July 20th at 7pm.

DISCUSSION:

The goal of this report is to provide an overview of the process and efforts used to collect community input on all three topic areas. The actual results of the surveys will be shared in August when MIG has completed the community engagement and has assembled insights. The summary report will be related to the following topical areas:
• New, additional, or different indoor space with two distinct focus areas o Use by staff for town business and administration
o Use by the community for meetings and other activities • New, additional, or different outdoor space
• New, additional, or different recreational activities This discussion and summary report is intended to provide the Council an overview of all the methods that have been used in the community engagement effort. In August, the findings will be shared that come from the various community engagement and survey efforts.

The final report from MIG can be served to the council in one of two ways. MIG, FlashVote, and staff can provide recommendations following their insights. As an alternative, staff can deliver a report free of recommendations and allow the Council to determine if they have the necessary information to move forward with the data and findings.

On one hand, by just providing the facts and insights of the analysis, the Council can review the information in its raw format and eliminate any perspectives or interpretations from the consultant or the staff. On the other hand, if the Council would like the staff and consultant to provide perspective and recommendations based on their experience and analysis, the benefit of the consultant and staff’s experience and background may be of value and could help the Council make a more informed decision.

Based on the history of these topics, the community is not of one mind about the outcomes and there will need to be some decisions made about what direction staff might proceed in these three topical areas. The reason the staff is bringing this before the Council in advance of the final report is that we will need the time from now until the final report is prepared, to prepare our approach. If the Council wishes to have the consultant and staff offer their perspective and recommendations based on the results of the survey, we will need to prepare accordingly and ensure we explore various options the Council may want to consider.

Staff Report Page 6
Community Facilities Needs Assessment Update
June 16, 2022
This question was brought before the Town Hall Ad Hoc Committee when staff met on May 26, 2022. It was their recommendation that the Council be provided the report and findings, and not recommendations.

In consideration of the three topical areas the only one that is time sensitive is the Town Hall addition. Considering we have moneys set aside in a CIP for the addition of a Town Hall and staff is at capacity, staff will ultimately need direction on how to proceed. Staff will need to either invest time in a Town Hall addition or pursue other options. As we approach the August meeting, if there are any additional insights the Council might need to get a clear sense of the community and staff’s opinions and perspectives on a Town Hall addition and the need for new/additional community space we will be seeking that direction.

In conclusion, today’s discussion is more specifically focused on sharing our extensive outreach efforts and ensure that the consultant and staff took every effort to ensure we collected a diverse and comprehensive span of the community's feedback. Secondly, in advance of the August City Council meeting, staff is requesting direction on if the Council would like staff and the consultant's recommendations or just the raw data. Finally, any additional insights that would help the Council have an informed discussion in August that may lead to clear direction to staff on how to proceed with the Town Hall addition /community space efforts.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed project does not qualify as a “Project” as defined in California Government Code Section 15378(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 2022 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

These projects are two key initiatives identified in the 2022 City Council priorities.

Complete Community Survey to understand Town priorities and consider improvements to Town facilities to establish a Town Hall Committee to evaluate ten-year plan on facilities needs, staffing, and Parks and Recreation programs and space. These key milestones are targeted for delivery in Q4 and Q2 respectively of 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

City Council adopted a resolution approving $60,000 for a Community Needs Assessment at their February 17, 2022 meeting. In addition, staff went through an informal bidding process and engaged in a contract with FlashVote for an amount not to exceed $25,000 to do a series of short scientific community surveys. There is no additional fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS

1. MIG Presentation

2. FlashVote Presentation

Staff Report Page 7
Community Facilities Needs Assessment Update
June 16, 2022

3. January 20, 2022 City Council Meeting Minutes

4. January 25, 2022 City Council Priority Setting Session Meeting Minutes

5. March 17, 2022 City Council Meeting Minutes

6. March 17, 2022 City Council Staff Report: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with MIG, Inc. for a Community Facility Needs Assessment.

Los Altos Hills
Community Facilities Needs Assessment

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS WHY?
• Looking across all facilities and all
perspectives
• Assembling a full picture of needs
• Inform City Council of discussion and
feedback

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Process Schedule
1: Project
Initiation
2: Outreach
Strategy
Development
3: Community
Outreach
Implementation
4: Community Outreach
Results and Final Report
March April May - June July-September
Next Steps:

Council
Direction
September

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS

RESULTS
Clear descriptions of needs as
expressed by the community
Information for City Council to
use in decision making

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS HOW?
Multiple methods to capture
multiple perspectives
• Flashvote Surveys
• Interviews
• Committee and Commission Input
• Town Hall Ad-Hoc Committee Input
• Town Hall Meetings (2)
• Council Updates and Presentations

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Community Interviews
• Informal interviews conducted by the
consulting team
• Small group discussion of indoor and
outdoor space needs
• Time to talk through past efforts and
current ideas

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Town Hall Meetings
May 31st 2022 at 6pm
bit.ly_LosAltosHillsTownHall1
July 20th 2022 at 7pm
bit.ly_LosAltosHillsTownHall2
Two dates
(optional) registration in advance!
Flyer sent to all addresses

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Town Hall Meeting #1

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Committee and Commission Input
Formal input from each committee and
commission to this process.
• What needs do you see in the
community for more, less or
different INDOOR spaces?
• What needs do you see in the
community for more, less or
different OUTDOOR spaces?
• Do you have any suggestions or
concerns to inform this
exploration?

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Working Space Analysis
• Interviews with LAH senior staff representing
each department and functional group.
• Five comparable cities queried for data on
working space

COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT • LOS ALTOS HILLS Individual Input
Additional details and personal
perspectives can be shared with
the team through this web form,
asking the same questions.
• Individual perspectives of
committee members
• Opportunity for interested
community members
• Easy to access and provide details
https://bit.ly/LAHFacilitiesInput

Los Altos Hills
Community Facilities Needs Assessment

Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com 1
“FlashVote Scientific Survey
Methodology: Indoor Space
and Outdoor Space”
Town of Los Altos Hills
Kevin Lyons, Chief Scientist, Governance Sciences Group [email protected], Direct: 510-593-4901

Scientific Panel Methodology
2013: FlashVote creates its first survey panel
2014: Pew Research creates its first survey panel
2018:
2022: FlashVote has customers in 25+ states
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 380 of 671
2 Engagement Perception: Park Quality
“Nothing but complaints”
“Everyone hates our parks now!”
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com 3
“Hate!” “Great!”

Reality: Park Quality
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com 4
“Hate!” “Great!”

4.0 out of 5: “Love, love, love the parks!”

0.3% 2.4%

54.9%

16.5%

21.6%

What is the difference?
Engagement vs Scientific Surveys
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com
Engagement = Input from people
especially interested in a topic

What is the difference?
Engagement = Input from people
especially interested in a topic
Scientific Surveys = Input from people
NOT especially interested in a topic
Engagement vs Scientific Surveys
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 384 of 671 6
What is the difference?
Engagement = Input from people
especially interested in a topic
Scientific Surveys = Input from people
NOT especially interested in a topic
Engagement vs Scientific Surveys
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 385 of 671
7 What is the difference?
Engagement = Input from people
especially interested in a topic
Scientific Surveys = Input from people
NOT especially interested in a topic
Engagement vs Scientific Surveys
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 386 of 671 8
What is each one for?
Engagement  Open-ended questions
to get individual facts/ideas/feedback
Engagement vs Scientific Surveys
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 387 of 671 9
What is each one for?
Engagement  Open-ended questions
to get individual facts/ideas/feedback
Scientific Surveys  Multiple choice
questions to get preferences/priorities
Engagement vs Scientific Surveys
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 388 of 671 10
Survey Results Guide
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 389 of 671
11 Questions?
?
Governance Sciences Group, Inc. (c) 2022
US Patent Pending www.flashvote.com Page 390 of 671
12 1
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
Via teleconference according to the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, Mayor Tyson called the City Council Regular Meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.

Present: Mayor George Tyson, Vice Mayor Linda Swan, Councilmember Stanley Q.

Mok, Councilmember Lisa Schmidt, Councilmember Kavita Tankha

Absent: None
Staff: City Manager Peter Pirenjad, City Attorney Steve Mattas, Planning and Building Director Sofia Mangalam, Public Works Director Oscar Antillon, Administrative Services Director Sarina Revillar, Management Analyst II Cody Einfalt, City Clerk Deborah Padovan
CALL TO ORDER (6:00 P.M.)
A. Roll Call
B. Pledge of Allegiance

1. AGENDA REVIEW
There were no changes to the agenda.

2. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
A. Recognition of Science Fair Winners Sofia Shah and Keela Zambre Forrest Williams introduced the two STEM winners, Sofia Shaw and Keela Karishma.

Keela Zambre, Los Altos Hills, told City Council she did a research project entitled Synthesis of Curcumin-Polyethylene Glycol-Valine Prodrug to improve bioavailability in Alzheimer’s disease treatments
Sofia Shaw explained that her research project was on Predicting and Modeling a Dog’s Behavior Based on Data from the Perspective of the Dog. She thanked the Council for the recognition.

The Council thanked the two students for their powerful projects and added their congratulations. No action was taken.

Town of Los Altos Hills
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Thursday, January 20, 2022 – 6:00 p.m.

Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

2 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
B. Presentation by the Pathways Committee Seeking City Council Guidance on Pathway Completion Rate
Bob Elson, Chair of the Pathways Committee, presented the commitee’s request for the Council to supply guidance on getting the pathways built. We have 77 miles of paths - areas where people can walk. We have 5 miles of paths that needs some TLC and 36 miles that need to be installed per the Master Path Plan. He asked if the Council wants a completed pathway system and will they authorize the funds.

Council discussion ensued. Council asked questions of Mr. Elson and received his responses.

Public Comment
Robert Sandor, Los Altos Hills, thanked Mr. Elson for his presentation. He is an avid user of the pathway system, and it is a huge asset for the community. He finds the 77 miles totally adequate and is not an advocate of spending a lot of money for new pathways.

Bridget Morgan, Los Altos Hills, said she has been a member of the Pathways Committee since 2015. She pointed out that what might be adequate for Mr. Sandor might not be for someone living in an area with fewer pathways.

DIRECTION: The City Council is in favor of moving ahead with the one-year plan. They are receptive to an accelerated schedule and will discuss this during the City Council Priority Setting Session scheduled for January 25, 2022.

3. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
Robert Sandor, Los Altos Hills, congratulated City Manager Pirenjad on being appointed as City Manager and the Council for selecting him. He mentioned that as an avid walker he was amazed to see the work done by LAH Fiber.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

Councilmember Swan announced that she would recuse herself from Items 4.K, 4.L, and

4.M.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan*, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha * for Items 4.A-4.J and 4.N-4.O NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: Swan* *for Items 4.K, 4.L, and 4.M only

3 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
ABSENT: None
A. Approval of Regular City Council Meeting Minutes – December 16, 2021 B. Approval of Special City Council Meeting Minutes – January 10, 2022 C. Review of Disbursements for December 1-31, 2021 $1,383,413.82 D. Motion to Re-Authorize Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Town of Los Altos Hills, Including the Planning Commission and Committees, due to the Imminent Risks to the Health and Safety of Attendees and Making Related Findings Pursuant to AB 361 (Staff: S. Mattas)
E. Resolution 01- 22 Approving a Policy for the Town of Los Altos Hills Regarding Organic Waste Product Procurement (Staff: C. Einfalt)
F. Resolution 02-22 Authorizing Application for, and Receipt of, the State of California Governor’s Office of Emergency Service Hazard Mitigation Grant and Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (Staff: C. Einfalt)
G. Resolution 03-22 of the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills Approving and Authorizing Execution of Amendment 2 between the Town of Los Altos Hills and Marsha Hovey, LLC (Staff: S. Revillar)
H. Resolution 04-22 Accepting a Summary Vacation of Pathway Easement; Lands of Byrne, LLC; 27290 Byrne Park Lane (Staff: O. Antillon)
I. Resolution 05-22 Accepting Dedication of Pathway Easement; Lands of Byrne, LLC; 27290 Byrne Park Lane (Staff: O. Antillon)
J. Resolution 06-22 Accepting Dedication of Pathway Easement; Lands of Daniel E.

Lenoski 2013 Revocable Trust; 27296 Byrne Park Lane (Staff: O. Antillon) K. Resolution 07-22 Accepting Dedication of a Pathway Easement; Lands of Pang; 13210 E. Sunset Drive (Staff: O. Antillon) (Swan Recuse) L. Resolution 08-22 Accepting Dedication of a Right-of-Way Easement; Lands of Pang; 13210 E. Sunset Drive (Staff: O. Antillon) (Swan Recuse) M. Resolution 09-22 Accepting Dedication of a Right-of-Way Easement; Lands of Williams; 13505 Burke Road (Staff: O. Antillon) (Swan Recuse) N. Resolution 10-22 Awarding the 2021/22 Sewer Capital Improvement Project to C2R Engineering in an amount not to exceed $380,830.00 (Staff: O. Antillon)

4 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
O. Notification of Fast Track Approval: Site Development Permit for a 6,192 square foot one-story residence with an attached 1,043 square foot, 4-car garage and an attached ADU at 12815 Deer Creek Lane; SD21-0048. Deadline to Appeal: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.

5. ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Resolution 11-22 Amendment to the Establishing Standing Committees and Adopting General Special Rules Pertaining Thereto to Update to Sunset the Education Committee and add a Technology Committee (Staff: D. Padovan) City Clerk Deborah Padovan presented the staff report.

Council discussion ensued.

Councilmember Mok suggested renaming the Community Relations Committee as the Community Relations and Education Committee.

Vice Mayor Swan agreed with the proposed name change, saying that it’s important to stress that Los Altos Hills supports education.

Councilmember Tankha agreed as well and added that the Education Committee is not being “sunsetted” but will be a very active part of the Community Relations and Education Committee.

Public Comment
Lew Jamison, Chair, Community Relations Committee, said that the committee has not had a chance to discuss the proposed action by the Council. He suggested postponing the acceptance of the resolution for a month to allow time to discuss at the committee level.

Councilmember Tankha would like to postpone consolidation of the Education Committee for a month.

Vice Mayor Swan agreed, saying this would allow the Community Relations Committee the opportunity to tell the Council if they are open to taking on the extra responsibilities of the Education Committee.

Mayor Tyson did not want to wait to form the Technology Committee and suggested splitting this into two actions.

Public Comment, continued
Jim Waschura, Los Altos Hills, asked about the formation of the Technology Committee and how the committee members be appointed.

5 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
Mayor Tyson explained that the normal process for appointing members to a committee will be followed and liaisons will be appointed tonight.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to approve Resolution 11-22 Establishing Standing Committees and Adopting General Special Rules Pertaining Thereto by adding Technology Committee; and postpone the consolidation of the Education Committee until the February City Council meeting.

The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tankha, Tyson, Mok, Schmidt, Swan
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
B. Resolution 12-22 Approving Town Hall Improvements of Furniture Purchase and Existing Space Reconfiguration and Design Build RFP for Town Hall Phase 2 (Staff:

O. Antillon)
City Manager Peter Pirnjad provided a background on the topic. Tonight’s discussion is meant to be about space and the reconfiguration of the existing town hall. No contracts are presented for approval. Nor is the floorplan. He clarified that Council is not being asked to approve Phase II at this time; it was included in the staff report for context only.

Public Works Director Oscar Antillon presented the staff report.

Public Comment
Robert Sandor, Los Altos Hills, was in opposition to the project. He is confused and does not know what is proposed. Why do we need additional space since the population is not growing?
Rajiv Bhateja, Los Altos Hills, believes that Phase II as conceived is dead on arrival. Residents can provide input on projects that need attention. There are so many different priorities.

Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, thinks there has been a failure in the process. The Town did not follow the procedures in working with the current architcect. What are the goals and what are we trying to achieve? There is no common understanding on what the goal is. He would like to see the details for staff reconfiguration. Council needs to determine the objectives and goals and get community support.

Jim Waschura, Los Altos Hills, said we are trying to undertake an assessment on

6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
what kind of building needs to be built. Does a building need to be built? We are short three or four seats for employees right now and after reviewing the RHNA numbers, the number of staff has to increase substantially. He is in favor of having the staff review the current plans and get the best deal possible. Doing nothing for two years is not an option.

Gary Patou, Los Altos Hills, was in opposition to the project. He said the footprint of the town hall site is small and the traffic is just manageable. He expressed concern about traffic at Fremont and Concepcion. He pointed out that there are nearly three times the staff now that there were when town hall was built.

Bridget Morgan, Los Altos Hills, said a well-run town hall is driven by demand from the town residents. It seems very clear that if we want smooth running of the Town operations, we need more staff in the town hall complex. She was in favor of approving action to study what Phase II would look like.

Further Council discussion ensued.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved
instruct town staff to continue researching the addition to town hall to be built on the same area and to approximately the same standards we have been looking at. The motion was seconded by Mayor Tyson.

MOTION FAILED 2-3:

AYES: Tyson, Schmidt
NOES: Swan, Mok, Tankha,
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Mayor Tyson moved to approve Resolution 12-22 Approving of Furniture Space and Reconfiguration The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Introduction of an Ordinance (First Reading) to Amend Title 6 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code Establishing Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction

7 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
Regulations Consistent with Senate Bill 1383 Requirements (Staff: O. Antillon) - Motion to Waive Reading and Introduce the Ordinance
Ex Parte Communications: None
Director Antillon presented the staff report.

Mayor Tyson opened the Public Hearing.

Robert Sandor, Los Altos Hills, said that Greenwaste was currently sorting our trash, and would like the town to fight this.

Mayor Tyson closed the Public Hearing.

Council discussion ensued.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved to waive reading and introduce Ordinance 600 to Amend Title 6 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code Establishing Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Regulations Consistent with Senate Bill 1383 Requirements. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Appointments to Committees and Outside Agencies (Staff: D. Padovan) The Council discussed council appointments for committees and outside agencies.

Public Comment
Heather Rose, Los Altos Hills, said that Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) funding would be helpful to continue the Fremont Road path to push forward with requesting funds to help with bicycle funds and state routes to school.

Bob Elson, Los Altos Hills, talked about putting a pathway in on the south side of Fremont.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved to approve committee assignments as presented [shown below]. The motion was seconded by

8 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
B. Discussion and Possible Action to Form a Council Ad Hoc Committee to Review the Upcoming Sheriff’s Contract (Staff: P. Pirnejad)
City Manager Pirnejad presented the staff report.

Council discussion ensued.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Mok moved to terminate the law enforcement ad hoc committee and form an ad hoc committee comprised of Vice Mayor Swan and Councilmember Mok to review and orchestrate the new sheriff’s contract. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

9 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
C. Resolution 13-22 Approving the Leasing of Town Electric Vehicles (Staff: O.

Antillon)
City Manager Pirnejad introduced the topic.

Director Antillon presented the staff report.

Council discussion ensued.

Public Comment
Ananad Ranganathan, Los Altos Hills, said he recommends the electric vehicle. Batteries keep getting better and better. He recommended leasing for now as it is important to be green.

Robert Sandor, Los Altos Hills, asked if there was a real need for an electric vehicle. He proposed a compromise by buying a used or plug-in Prius.

Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, said that the FIC did not discuss this matter as it wasn’t on the agenda. Anyone who submitted comments after the FIC meeting were their personal comments.

Further council discussion ensued.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved to approve Resolution 13-22 Approving the Leasing of Town Electric Vehicles. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
Break at 9:19 p.m
Reconvened to open session at 9:25 p.m.

10 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
D. Resolution 14-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Amendment No. 4 with West Bay Sanitary District or Issuance of a Request for Proposals for a New Contract (Staff: O. Antillon)
City Manager Pirenjad provided background on the topic.

Director Antillon presented the staff report.

Council discussion ensued.

Public Comment
Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, he thinks we are too late in this decision-making process.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice Mayor Swan moved to approve Resolution 14-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Amendment No. 4 with West Bay Sanitary District or Issuance of a Request for Proposals for a New Contract. The motion was seconded by Mayor Tyson.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

8. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND

COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES
A. Report by the Undergrounding Subcommittee (Mayor Tyson) Mayor Tyson said we have continued to press PG&E to apply resources to the project.

No action was taken.

B. Report by the Fire Taskforce Subcommittee (Councilmember Schmidt) Councilmember Schmidt had nothing to report.

C. Status Reports from All Councilmembers on Subcommittee and Outside Agencies Activities
There were no reports.

11 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022

9. STAFF REPORTS
A. City Manager
City Manager Pirnejad reported that we are looking forward to the goal-setting session scheduled for January 25, 2022 and encouraged the community to stay and get involved in the discussion.

B. City Attorney
No report.

C. City Clerk
City Clerk Padovan reported that COVID testing will be held in the Council Chambers on January 27, 2022 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

D. Planning Director
Planning Director Sofia Mangalam reported that there was a Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting on January 19th where they received an informational presentation from the housing consultant. The first community event is scheduled for February 10th at 6 p.m. She encouraged community members to attend and share ideas and feedback.

E. Administrative Services Director
Administrative Services Director Sarina Revillar outlined what was scheduled to be on the February 2022 City Council agenda, including the mid-year financial update.

F. Public Works Director
Public Works Director Oscar Antillon reported that we are moving forward with the recruitment for Assistant Engineer.

Management Analyst II Cody Einfalt provided an update on the status of the ALPR installation.

10. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS – None.

11. CLOSED SESSION - ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING:

12 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 20, 2022
A. CLOSED SESSION: PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957)
Title: City Attorney
Public Comment
Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, believes there should be opportunity for public comment on the Consent Calendar. He noted that there were two recent Brown Act violations where items not on the agenda were discussed at length, with negative results. He asked the City Attorney to interrupt discussions of this kind early so future violations do not occur. He spoke of two contracts that had been approved with troubling provisions and asked the City Attorney more carefully scrutinize contract language before contracts come to the Council for approval.

Adjourned to Closed Session at 10:00 p.m.

12. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION

13. ADJOURN REGULAR MEETING AND CLOSED SESSION
There was no reportable action resulting from the Closed Session. The meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Deborah L. Padovan
Deborah Padovan
City Clerk
The minutes of the January 20, 2022, regular City Council meeting were approved as presented at the February 17, 2022, regular City Council meeting.

1 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
January 25, 2022
Via teleconference according to Assembly Bill 361, Mayor Tyson called the City Council Special Meeting to order at 9:02 a.m.

Present: Mayor Tyson, Vice Mayor Swan, Councilmember Mok, Councilmember Schmidt, Councilmember Tankha

Absent: None
Staff: City Manager Peter Pirnejad, Public Works Director Oscar Antillon, Administrative Services Director Sarina Revillar, Planning/Building Director Sofia Mangalam, Community Services Supervisor Sarah Robustelli, Management Analyst II Cody Einfalt, Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Captain Rich Urena, City Clerk Deborah Padovan, Facilitator Robert Bell CALL TO ORDER (9:00 A.M.)
A. Roll Call
B. Pledge of Allegiance

1. STUDY SESSION
A. Introductory Remarks/Los Altos Hills Historian
Jitze Couperus, Member of the Los Altos Hills History Committee, set the tone for the meeting as one of honoring the Town’s history, establishing trust and collaboration, and emphasized that we must all work together to continue the rich history and traditions that make Los Altos Hills a special community with an exceptional qualityof-life for residents.

B. Council Priority Setting
Facilitator Robert Bell set the ground rules, foundational principles, and context for the meeting. He explained that he had one-on-one interviews with the City Council members as it related to the design of the Priority Setting Session. In those discussions, the Council had reconfirmed their aspirational categories that serve as the framework for Council and Town priorities. Those four categories, or framework pillars, are:
o Quality of Life and Community Character
o Public Safety
o Effective Service Delivery & Governance
o Infrastructure
Town of Los Altos Hills
City Council Special Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, January 25, 2022
Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

2 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
January 25, 2022
City Manager Peter Pirnejad presented the review of the 2021 work plan and an update for the key 2021 Projects that fit within the framework. A total of 13 projects, which are outside of the day-to-day operations of the Town, were reviewed with the Council and members of the public.

Council discussion ensued.

Councilmember Tankha proposed a motion as follows:

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to establish a Town Hall committee that will evaluate the needs of the community, work with staff to understand the needs of staff in terms of office space presently and 10 years out. This Committee would look at options for a town hall addition, remodel, or expansion.

Secondly, conduct a town-wide survey to understand the priorities of town residents in terms of their needs and what they would like the town’s budget to be in addressing those needs. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

Council discussion ensued. The motion was tabled until the end of the meeting.

Public Comment
Rajiv Bhateja, Los Altos Hills, complimented the City Council on having this meeting as it is valuable for staff and helpful for residents. He said that we do not have a committee to cover public safety concerns. He thought it would be great if the Town would consider creating a public safety committee to look at safety in all dimensions.

Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, complimented the Council on having this session. He commented on Councilmember Tankha's motion and talked about community space. He said that the Town should focus on multi-year projects and that milestones need to be reported.

Vice Mayor Swan responded that the Council just created a law enforcement ad hoc committee, and she envisions that public safety would be discussed there but said that a committee might be more appropriate.

The meeting went into recess at 10:22 a.m.

The meeting Reconvened to open session at 10:35 a.m.

C. Public Comment (Public Comment is Limited to Items which are the Subject of the Special Meeting)
D. Recommendation to Approve a 2022 Work Plan

3 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
January 25, 2022
City Manager Pirnejad then presented the 2022 Recommended Work Plan. The plan consisted of 21 priority projects, aligned with, and categorized under, the four framework pillars. He said that 17 of the 21 projects were already being worked on by staff and 3 of those 17 are required to comply with state mandates.

Mayor Tyson suggested the City Council provide feedback to staff.

Facilitator Bell said that while the Council has deliberation, he will be tracking the comments and then at the end of the meeting we intend to have a motion that includes everything for the workplan.

The Council provided feedback.

Public Comment
Jitze Couperus, Los Altos Hills, commented on document storage and the technology committee. He is worried that the Town’s IT service in Redwood City is leaving. All committees have a need to work on the web, but we need some mechanism where committee members are able to create content for the website. The other item, Foothill College is a wonderful idea, but if doesn't give us RHNA credit, it doesn't really help us.

Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, said that he wants to be sure that a facility plan gets completed during the year that incorporates Town Hall and other buildings and properties that the Town owns. He suggested the Council take action on the sewer fund.

John Swan, Los Altos Hills, thanked Jitze Couperus for his presentation at the beginning of the meeting. He appreciated the meeting content. He suggested a second category which is a goal that is important to the Town, but will require little to no staff time. He thinks the Parks and Recreation Committee can work on the legacy giving program on their own.

Carol Gottlieb, Los Altos Hills, said that Environmental Design and Protection Committee and Environmental Initiatives Committee are both working on water conservation as it relates to landscaping.

Jim Waschura, Los Altos Hills, he agreed that a long term goal for the Town with legacy giving was a good one.

Rajiv Bhateja, Los Altos Hills, said the City Manager's presentation was very distinct and helpful. He thanked the Council for the respect they have for each other and the public.

4 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
January 25, 2022
After public comment and a review of the projects, discussion by the Council, and input from the public, two projects were removed from the list and seven projects were added. Those amendments to the proposed work plan were as follows:

Items Removed:
o Postpone Legislative Advocacy item to a future year.
o Remove Citizens Academy.

Items Added:
o Consolidate committees on public safety
o Formalize Pathway 10 segments, hire contractor to help o Relocate non-digital records for safety/security
o Add discussion with Foothill College to the current plan on RHNA o Establish Council Ad Hoc to explore legacy giving program o Establish a Town Hall Committee to evaluate 10-year plan on facility needs, staffing and Parks and Recreation programs and space
o Obtain a legal opinion on ballot initiative and green sheets Further Council discussion ensued.

The meeting went into Recess at 1:04 p.m.

The meeting Reconvened to open session at 1:25 p.m.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved to adopt the work plan, postponing legislative advocacy and removing the Citizen’s Academy; and including consolidating committees on public safety; formalize 10 pathway segments per year, including hiring a contractor to assist; relocate non-digitized records for safety; add a discussion with Foothill College to the current plan on RHNA numbers; establish a Council ad hoc committee to explore legacy giving programs; establish a town hall committee to evaluate a 10 year plan on facility needs, staffing and parks & recreation programs and space; obtain a legal opinion on a ballot initiative as it relates to the green sheets. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
Public Comment
Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, commended the Council on the process. He said the pathways discussion involves substantial expenditures and should go through the budget process. He would also like to see the sewer plan discussed.

5 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
January 25, 2022
Mayor Tyson then reminded the Council that there was a motion on the floor.

Councilmember Tankha then withdrew her earlier motion.

2. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 1:39 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Deborah L. Padovan
Deborah Padovan
City Clerk
The minutes of the January 25, 2022 special City Council meeting were approved as presented at the February 17, 2022, regular City Council meeting.

1 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
This meeting was conducted virtually pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 361 and Government Code Section 54953(e) related to conducting public meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayor Tyson called the City Council Special Meeting to order at 5:55 p.m.

Present: Mayor George Tyson, Vice Mayor Linda Swan, Councilmember Stanley Q.

Mok, Councilmember Lisa Schmidt, Councilmember Kavita Tankha

Absent: None
Staff: City Manager Peter Pirenjad, City Attorney Steve Mattas, Planning and Building Director Sofia Mangalam, Public Works Director Oscar Antillon, Administrative Services Director Sarina Revillar, Principal Planner Steve Padovan, Management Analyst II Cody Einfalt, City Clerk Deborah Padovan

1. CALL TO ORDER (5:30 P.M.)
Mayor Tyson called the closed session meeting to order at 5:55 p.m.

For the record, City Attorney Mattas abstained for the closed session portion as it relates to him.

2. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING:

A. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION -There was no public comment on the Closed Session Item)

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Unrepresented Employee: City Attorney and Department Directors Agency Designated Representative: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager

3. ADJOURN CLOSED SESSION
The closed session adjourned at 6:07 and Mayor Tyson opened the meeting at 6:09 p.m.

4. OPEN SESSION (6:00 P.M.)
A. Roll Call
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Moment of Silence
Town of Los Altos Hills
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 17, 2022 – 5:30 p.m.

Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

2 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Mayor Tyson asked for a moment of silence in support of the brave people in the country of Ukraine.

5. AGENDA REVIEW AND REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
There were no changes to the agenda and no reportable action arising out of closed session.

6. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
A. Reappointment to the Los Altos Hills Environmental Design and Protection Committee
City Clerk Padovan presented the application.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to reappoint Buvana Dayanandum to the Los Altos Hills Environmental Design and Protection Committee for a second, four-year term. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Schmidt.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
B. Reappointment to the Los Altos Hills Open Space Committee City Clerk Padovan presented the reappointment request.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to reappoint Peter Brown to the Los Altos Hills Open Space Committee for a second, four-year term. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Schmidt.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
C. Reappointment to the Los Altos Hills History Committee

3 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
City Clerk Padovan presented the reappointment request of Sylvia Jensen.

Sylvia Jensen expressed her interest in serving. She has enjoyed her first term on the committee and would like to continue.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice Mayor Swan moved to reappoint Sylvia Jensen to the Los Altos Hills History Committee for a second, four-year term. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Tankha.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
D. Report and Information on the Los Altos Hills County Fire District’s Upcoming Vegetation/Evacuation Route Hardening Project on Altamont Road Captain Denise Gluhan, Los Altos Hills County Fire District, presented the LAHCFD upcoming vegetation route hardening project on Altamont Road.

The Council received the report. No action was taken.

E. Report on the Status of Los Altos Hills Community Fiber Project Gautam Agrawal, Los Altos Hills Community Fiber, presented a report on the activites of the fiber project in town.

The Council asked questions of Dr. Agrawal and received his responses. No action was taken.

7. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no presentations from the floor.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

4 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
ABSENT: None
Mayor Tyson commented on Item 8.D that we are following the law and will be looking at returning to in person/hybrid meetings in the near future.

A. Approval of Special City Council Meeting Minutes – February 17, 2022 B. Approval of Regular City Council Meeting Minutes – February 17, 2022 C. Review of Disbursements for February 1-28, 2022 $1,087,539.99 D. Motion to Re-Authorize Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Town of Los Altos Hills, Including the Planning Commission and Committees, due to the Imminent Risks to the Health and Safety of Attendees and Making Related Findings Pursuant to AB 361 (Staff: S. Mattas)
E. Approval of the Change in Regular Meeting Schedule for the Los Altos Hills Environmental Initiatives Committee (Staff: D. Padovan) F. Request by the Los Altos Hills History Committee to Host and Advertise a History Walk on Saturday, April 30, 2022 (History Committee)
G. Resolution 26-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with MIG, Inc. for a Community Facility Needs Assessment (Staff: S. Robustelli) H. Receive Report on the Los Altos Hills 2022 Summer Internship Program (Staff: C.

Einfalt)
I. Notification of Fast Track Approval: 25959 Alicante Lane; File #SD21-0088; Lands of Liu; Site Development Permit for a new 5,338 square-foot two-story residence with a 2,757 square-foot basement, an attached 583 square-foot accessory dwelling unit (ADU), a 271 square-foot cabana, a 1,131 square-foot swimming pool and a 5,897 square-foot tennis court. (Staff: J. Loh) Appeal Deadline: March 23, 2022 by 5:00 p.m.

9. ONGOING BUSINESS
A. Review of the Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) Pilot Program and Resolution 27-22 Accepting the Continued use of the ALPR System in Town (Staff:

C. Einfalt)
Management Analyst Cody Einfalt presented the staff report.

Captain Rich Urena, Santa Clara County Office of the Sheriff, commented on recent burglaries in town. He suggested if you have an alarm, use it. If you are going out of town, please let your neighbors know.

5 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Council discussion ensued.

Mayor Tyson said he will talk to the City Manager about overtime for an additional deputy.

Public Comment
Anand Ranganathan, Los Altos Hills, asked that every camera have a note for residents on how to opt out.

City Manager Pirenjad said there are 38 cameras are installed and we have two left that need to be installed. He suggested working with the sheriff to determine where the last two cameras should be installed. Mayor Tyson agreed with that suggestion.

Rajiv Bhateja, Los Altos Hills, said there are additional entrances in the town today that are not covered. He requested that the town administration deploy cameras at every feasible location to maximize the coverage so all entrances to town are covered.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice Mayor Swan moved to adopt Resolution 27-22 Accepting the Continued use of the ALPR System in Town. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Ex Parte Communications: None
A. Consideration of Heritage Tree Designation for two (2) Heritage Oak Trees at Byrne Preserve (Staff: J. Loh)
Planning Director Sofia Mangalam presented the staff report.

Mayor Tyson opened the Public Hearing. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Mayor Tyson closed the Public Hearing.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice Mayor Swan moved to adopt Resolution 28-22 Designating Two Valley Oak Trees at Byrne Preserve as Heritage Trees. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Schmidt.

6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
B. Resolution 29-22 Approving an Update to the Town’s Existing Outdoor Lighting Policy to Provide Additional Guidelines, Clarifications, and Definitions (Staff: J.

Loh)
Principal Planner Steve Padovan presented the staff report.

Council discussion ensued.

Mayor Tyson opened the Public Hearing.

Birgitta Indaco, Los Altos Hills, thanked the planning staff and the Environmental Design and Protection Committee for the numerous hours and hard work on this project. She thanked the Council for considering this topic.

Mayor Tyson closed the Public Hearing.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to approve Resolution 29-22 Approving an Update to the Town’s Existing Outdoor Lighting Policy to Provide Additional Guidelines, Clarifications, and Definitions. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
C. 27210 Altamont Road – File #CUP21-0003 – ATC Sequoia LLC/Lands of Town of Los Altos Hills; Resolution 30-22 to Approve a Ten (10) Year Renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for the existing wireless telecommunications facility at 27210 Altamont; CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Sections 15301(b) (Staff: S.

Padovan)
Principal Planner Steve Padovan presented the report.

Council asked questions of staff and received responses.

7 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Mayor Tyson opened the Public Hearing.

John Merritt, American Tower, thanked the Council for hearing the item. He said the ALPR cameras are supported by the tower.

Mayor Tyson closed the Public Hearing.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice Mayor Swan moved to approve Resolution 30-22 to Approve a Ten (10) Year Renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for the existing wireless telecommunications facility at 27210 Altamont; CEQA review: Categorical Exemption per Sections 15301(b). The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
D. 2021 Annual Progress Report. Review of the 2021 General Plan Annual Progress Report and 2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report; and Authorize transmittal of the reports to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) (Staff: S. Mangalam) Director Mangalam presented the staff report. She thanked Assistant Planner Areli Perez for putting the report together.

The town has met its RHNA goal for very-low, Low, and Above-Moderate (market rate) income units.

The town has met its overall RHNA allocation of 121 units for the planning period 2015-2023; however, the town still need to meet its obligation for moderate housing units.

The ADU regulations enacted by the State and the ADU ordinance adopted by the City Council have significantly increased ADU production in the town. The increased production over the next few years will be beneficial to the town in meeting its RHNA goals for the next housing cycle as well.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the report and direct staff to forward the report to OPR and HCD.

Council asked questions of staff and received responses.

Mayor Tyson opened the Public Hearing. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Mayor

8 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Tyson closed the Public Hearing.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Schmidt moved to approve the report and direct staff to forward the report to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
Recess: 8:07 p.m.

Reconvene to Open Session: 8:14 p.m.

11. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution 31-22 Authorizing Subapplication for the State of California Governor’s Office of Emergency Service Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funds and Appropriating $200,000 from the Unreserved General Fund for the 25% Match Needed for the Grant (Staff: C. Einfalt)
Management Analyst II Cody Einfalt presented the staff report.

Council discussion ensued.

Public Comment
Allan Epstein, Los Altos Hills, complimented Mr. Einfalt on an outstanding job putting this grant together. The consultant suggested keeping the number low. He felt that by demonstrating success with the program, we would be more likely to be eligible. He suggested ways of determining the criteria for homes eligible for the program.

Jitze Couperus, Los Altos Hills, commented that we have had a requirement in our codes for a class A roof, which is not a shake roof. There may be an old, abandoned house that has a shake roof. He would be surprised if there were more than a few shake roofs.

City Manager Pirnejad complimented Allan Epstein for doing the “lion’s share” of the work to get this grant.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Councilmember Tankha moved to approve Resolution 31-22 Authorizing Subapplication for the State of California Governor’s

9 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Office of Emergency Service Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funds and Appropriating $200,000 from the Unreserved General Fund for the 25% Match Needed for the Grant. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Mok.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
B. Resolution 32-22 Declaring the Intention to Increase Sewer Service Charges in Both Palo Alto and Los Altos Sewer Basins, Setting a Public Hearing and Directing Staff to Mail Notices to all Sewer Users (Staff: O. Antillon) Public Works Director Oscar Antillon presented the staff report along with Rick Simonson and Geoff Michalczyk with HF&H Consultants.

Council discussion ensued.

MOTION MADE AND SECONDED: Vice Mayor Swan moved to approve Resolution 32-22 Declaring the Intention to Increase Sewer Service Charges in Both Palo Alto and Los Altos Sewer Basins, Setting a Public Hearing and Directing Staff to Mail Notices to all Sewer Users. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Schmidt.

MOTION PASSED 5-0:

AYES: Tyson, Swan, Mok, Schmidt, Tankha
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
ABSENT: None
Vice Mayor Swan mentioned that the Council, during their 2023 Goal Setting Session, should consider reviewing the allocation of charges for sewer treatment and conveyance between the town of Los Altos Hills, Los Altos and Palo Alto.

12. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB-COMMITTEES, AND

COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES
A. Report by the Undergrounding Subcommittee (Mayor Tyson) Mayor Tyson presented the undergrounding report. He and Public Works Director Antillon were continuing to reach out to PG&E contacts. He had also reached out to the CPUC contact to see how we can get better support in terms of incentives for utility undergrounding.

10 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Council received the report. No action was taken.

B. Request by Councilmember Schmidt to Rename the Fire Taskforce Subcommittee to the Public Safety Subcommittee (Councilmember Schmidt)
Councilmember Schmidt presented the report.

Council discussion ensued.

Public Comment
Rajiv Bhateja, Los Altos Hills, said this is a really important and valuable direction.

There was a general consensus for support.

C. Report from the Council Subcommittee on Community Surveys (Councilmember Schmidt)
Councilmember Schmidt presented the report. Residents have expressed a strong for desire for more communication with governments. The town has contracted with FlashVote for a series of scientific surveys.

Individuals can sign up at www.flashvote.com/LosAltosHills. The goal is to have 200+ residents participating in the surveys. The first survey will focus on common space needs and inform the Council on the general sentiment of the community. A consultant has been contacted on doing community outreach.

There will be four or five surveys between now and August.

Council discussion ensued.

Public Comment
John Swan, Los Altos Hills, emphasized the importance of including input from the Parks and Recreation Committee in the decision-making process.

No action was taken.

D. Status Reports from All Councilmembers on Subcommittee and Outside Agencies Activities
Mayor Tyson commented on the previous Education Committee. He listened and heard concerns. He had a series of meetings with LASD Superintendent Jeff Baier and talked about Los Altos Hills needs and the future. Based on his suggestion, he then reached out to Fred Gallagher on the Los Altos Citizen Advisory for finance. He also met with the president of Los Altos School District Steve

11 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Taglio. He suggested asking staff to add an annual meeting of the Mayor and the president of the school district on the calendar.

He also reported that he met with the GM and President of Purissima Hills Water District. Attended the Peninsula League of California Cities event and also the Los Altos Little League day last week.

Councilmember Mok said that he can no longer serve on the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) due to conflicts of interest.

13. STAFF REPORTS
A. City Manager
City Manager Pirnejad reported that the community survey mailer has been sent and he encouraged everyone to sign up to take the surveys. Now that the Council approved the internships, the openings will be on CalOpps tomorrow (March 18th).

He further reported on the action of council subcommittees including the legacy giving, Greenwaste, town facility needs, and the ad hoc on the sheriff’s contract. Further, a roundtable has been scheduled with committee chairs, the City Manager, and Mayor to discuss collaboration between committees and any unmet needs. The Technology Committee has met twice this month and he complimented their dedication.

B. City Attorney
No report.

C. City Clerk
City Clerk Padovan reported that the State of the Cities luncheon is scheduled for Friday, March 25th. Those wishing to sign up should visit the Los Altos Chamber of Commerce website.

D. Planning Director
Director Mangalam reminded everyone that the Joint City Council/Planning Commission Housing Element Workshop is set for Thursday, March 24th.

E. Administrative Services Director - Report on Licenses and Permits and Charges for Service
Director Revillar talked about licenses and permits and charges for services.

F. Public Works Director

12 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2022
Director Antillon reported that the Public Works Department is now fully staffed. He commented that the landscape contract will extend for another year as the council approved a 2-year program. A year from now we will go out to bid and combine the two landscape contracts. We will also be doing an inventory program for the signs in town.

14. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS
A. Possible Action on Hosting a Roundtable with the Community on Public Safety (Councilmember Tankha)
Councilmember Tankha presented the item. She suggested having small meetings with residents along with the sheriff. She requested having the sheriff at these meetings.

There was Council consensus to allow Councilmember Tankha to continue having a series of community roundtables with the sheriff’s office present to provide information on how residents can protect themselves from residential burglaries. She agreed to report back to the council.

15. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Deborah L. Padovan
Deborah Padovan
City Clerk
The minutes of the March 17, 2022, regular City Council meeting were approved as presented at the April 21, 2022, regular City Council meeting.

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS March 17, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH MIG INC. FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITY NEEDS

ASSESSMENT
FROM: Sarah Robustelli, Sr. Community Services Supervisor APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION That the City Council:

Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with MIG, Inc. for a Community Facility Needs Assessment.

BACKGROUND
The City Council Community Survey subcommittee was originally formed at their February 2020 meeting. At that time, Councilmembers Tankha and Tyson were appointed. In August 2021, the Community Survey subcommittee members changed to Councilmembers Tyson and Schmidt.

On January 25, 2022, City Council 2022 Priority Setting meeting, Council approved a goal to establish a Town Hall committee to evaluate a 10-year plan on facility needs, staffing, Parks and Recreation programs, and space.

In support of the proposed Community Engagement Contract with MIG, Inc. the Town has kicked off a town-wide survey to inform the engagement process. This is separate and apart from this proposed community engagement effort. Since the Council goal setting meeting of January 25, 2022, staff and the Community Survey subcommittee have met on three occasions, February 1, 9, and 22. The Town has received informal bids for the community surveys and has contracted with FlashVote to administer a series of scientific surveys throughout the year. This month, the Town is sending a mailer to every household encouraging residents to sign-up to take the Town surveys. The subcommittee will be reporting out at this City Council meeting and will discuss that the survey is intended to solicit community input to understand the priorities of Town residents. The subcommittee’s goal is to administer the first survey before the end of this month.

The survey combined with the Community Facilities Needs Assessment will answer and evaluate the 10-year facility needs, staffing, Parks and Recreation programs, and space. The results will inform the current and future needs of the community. The resident feedback from the survey will support the Community Facilities Needs Assessment efforts. The Community Facilities Needs Assessment is intended to elaborate and explore, in more detail, and clarify the needs of the community. This is not a Facility Master Plan, as a final set of recommendations of proposed

projects will not be presented. The purpose of this effort is to provide the City Council with insight and clarity about broad spectrums of the staff and community facility needs.

DISCUSSION
Staff reached out to five companies for informal bids for the Community Facilities Needs Assessment: AECOM, Achille Buchanan & Associates, Crescendo Consulting Group, Diehl Consulting Group, and MIG, Inc. Two requests went unanswered, and staff set up meetings with three companies. During those meetings, Staff communicated the following scope of work for the Community Facilities Needs Assessment:

Community Engagement
 Two (2) community workshops/Town Hall meetings to discuss the community’s needs. o Virtual and In-person
 Interviews with stakeholders and committees to gauge needs  Written and oral reports to City Council
Staff Engagement
 Solicit feedback from staff on current and future needs  Benchmark space from similar communities
After discussions, only two companies submitted proposals. The AECOM proposal is for $98,000, attachment 2. The MIG, Inc. proposal is for $59,780, attachment 3.

The MIG, Inc. proposal has a thoughtful approach and portrays a better understanding of the Town of Los Altos Hills. MIG, Inc has a proven track record and decades of experience in planning and community engagement. Based on the favorable cost estimate and for these reasons, staff recommends the MIG, Inc. proposal.

MIG, Inc. has outlined an aggressive yet achievable approach to meet City Council priorities and deliver the Community Facilities Needs Assessment Report to City Council in July or August 2022. The MIG, Inc. timeline and deliverables are below.

Date Action Deliverables
March Project Initiation
Project Team Initiation Meeting,
Background Information
Review/Community Reconnaissance
April-June
Community
Engagement
Engagement Strategy Memo, FlashVote
survey design, 2 Town Hall Meetings,
Committee and Community Input
Toolkit, 10 Stakeholder Interviews,
Consolidated summary memo of
community engagement findings
March-August
City Council
Engagement
5 Updated Materials, 3 Presentations to
Council

April-July
City Staff
Engagement
Coordination meeting with City selected
architect, working space needs survey,
comparison to standards for
civic/community space in similar
communities
July-August
Community Facilities
Needs Assessment
Administrative draft report, council draft
report, final report
5 months
Project Management
and Administration
Monthly invoicing and communications,
Organized and packaged projects files
MIG, Inc. intends to capture the interests of the Town by leveraging the results of the survey as well as work with the community in a series of community workshops and to interview stakeholders. This level of engagement will provide the City Council with much more insight than a survey. The survey will paint broad strokes of understanding. The community engagement process laid out by MIG Inc., will provide the Council with the details and specific intent behind the sentiment captured by the community surveys and other areas that may have been left out. The report will result in a finished product that the staff intends to bring to the council by August.

This report will complete the City Council’s goal, to establish a Town Hall committee to evaluate a 10-year plan on facility needs, staffing, Parks and Recreation programs, and space.

FISCAL IMPACT
When discussing the mid-year budget, City Council adopted a resolution approving $60,000 for a Community Needs Assessment at their February 17, 2022 meeting. The MIG Inc. estimates their project costs at $59,780.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
This project directly supports a Council priority to consider improvements to Town Facilities.

The key outcome of this goal is to improve services to the community by establishing a Town Hall Committee to evaluate a 10-year plan on facilities, including Town Hall, staffing, parks and recreation programs, and space.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution -22

2. AECOM Proposal

3. MIG Proposal

Attachment 1
RESOLUTION -22

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH MIG, INC. FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITY NEEDS

ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council Community Survey subcommittee was originally formed at their February 2020 meeting; and
WHEREAS, on August 2021, the Community Survey subcommittee members changed to Councilmembers Tyson and Schmidt; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2022, City Council 2022 Priority Setting meeting, Council approved a goal to establish a Town Hall committee to evaluate a 10-year plan on facility needs, staffing, Parks and Recreation programs, and space; and WHEREAS, the Town has a contract to administer a series of scientific surveys throughout the year; and
WHEREAS, the Community Facilities Needs Assessment is intended to elaborate and explore, in more detail, and clarify the needs of the community; and WHEREAS, the MIG, Inc. proposal has a thoughtful approach and portrays a better understanding of the Town of Los Altos Hills with a proven track record and decades of experience in planning and community engagement; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work includes two Town Hall meeting, Committee and Community input toolkit, 10 stakeholder interviews, consolidated summary memo of community engagement findings, five written reports to City Council, three presentations to City Council, coordination meeting with City selected architect, working space needs survey, comparison to standards for civic/community space in similar communities.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills that;

1. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with MIG, Inc. for a Community Facility Needs Assessment.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
George Tyson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Deborah Padovan, City Clerk

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
1 To: Sarah Robustelli, MPA
Sr. Community Services Supervisor
Town of Los Altos Hills
26379 Fremont Road,
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Re: City of Los Altos Hills Community Needs Assessment + Capital Planning Strategy Project
Dear Ms. Robustelli,
Our Strategy+ and Asset Advisory teams are happy to have the opportunity to provide a scope of work for your Community Needs Assessment to assist your team in aligning the Town’s future capital spending with Town/community priorities and develop a plan for repositioning assets that considers future staff growth and the changing nature of work. Our fully integrated team of business strategists and asset management specialists have assisted many other cities and counties in ensuring that their physical assets, capital spending and civic needs are fully aligned. We will provide an appropriately scaled proposal to your community’s needs within in our following areas of expertise:

INTEGRATED DELIVERY
Our interdisciplinary team of business strategists, planners, engineers, designers and change management specialists combine to support all stages of your business and asset portfolio lifecycle. We integrate strategic organizational planning, asset analysis, investment prioritization and operations/capital planning with workplace strategies for all space and facility types.

DATA DRIVEN SOLUTIONS
Our analytical tools simplify complex data, allowing you to make accurate, credible, and defensible investment decisions. This includes the capability not only to predict the cost of facilities proposals, but also understand the operational costs, human and technology resource needs, and process performance improvement outcomes.

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
2 BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION EXPERIENCE
• Analyze business priorities / risks and align with capital asset and operational investments
• Align operational priorities with asset capacity and performance capabilities • Identify the facilities impacts of human resources needs and technology investments

ASSET STRATEGIES
• Prioritize real estate investments and maintenance programs to provide long term portfolio resilience
• Increase asset efficiency and effectiveness through prioritized maintenance programs

WORKPLACE STRATEGIES
• Undertake office space analysis and design using business and asset performance data
• Consolidate or re-purpose buildings and parks assets for optimized use Please let us know if you have any questions- our team is happy to further work with you to tailor our proposal to suit your needs.

Many Thanks,
Jill Kurth Corinne Stewart
Principal, Strategy+ Principal, Asset Advisory

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
3 Los Altos Hills Community Needs +
Capital Planning Strategy

INTRODUCTION
The Town of Los Altos Hills wishes to align future capital and operational spending with community priorities and develop a plan for repositioning assets that considers future staff growth and the changing nature of work. AECOM proposes an engagement milestone approach to understand the Town’s needs and outcomes.

Understanding of Town’s Needs and Outcomes
Our team’s understanding of the desired activities and outcomes is based on the following communications from the Town; we used these as the basis for developing our scope of work:

During a session of Council, Councilmember Tankha moved to: ‘Establish a Town Hall committee that will evaluate the needs of the community, work with staff to understand the needs of staff in terms of office space presently and ten years out.

This Committee would look at options for a town hall addition, remodel, or expansion.

Secondly, conduct a town-wide survey to understand the priorities of town residents in terms of their needs and what they would like the town’s budget to be in addressing those needs’. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Swan.

The following guidance was also provided: ‘In addition to a needs assessment for the City’s staff which would require a discussion with staff and needs forecasting, we also need to engage our community about their needs specific to three topic areas:
• The need or interest in community meeting space for clubs, committees, etc. • The need or interest in the town providing additional passive or active Parks • The need or interest in additional recreational classes and programs.

There is a request for two (2) community workshops to discuss the communities needs and interests:
• A series of interviews with various interest groups and committees to gauge their interest.
• A series of surveys which the town is already conducting’.

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
4 PROJECT PHASING

1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Includes overall project management, contracting, accounting, client communication, team management and execution.

2. ENGAGEMENT

2.1.(3) Community Interest Group Interviews
Understand the results of the community survey and prepare engagement strategy and materials for Community Interest Group interviews. Conduct interview sessions to focus on vision and mission, growth, functional priorities, and potential partners. Synthesize content into collective key findings.

2.2.(1) Future of Work Workshop
Conduct a Future of Work workshop with City staff to develop work style guidelines and hybrid working policies. Socialize future of work benchmarks to staff growth trajectory

2.3. (1) Community Open House
Conduct Community Open House to communicate survey, interest group interviews and future of work workshop findings to date. Solicit feedback on capital investment priorities.

3. ASSESSMENT
We recommend performing a facility condition assessment to understand the existing condition of the Los Altos Town Hall

SCHEDULING THE SURVEY
The site visit will be coordinated four
weeks in advance and includes a
meeting with facility representatives to
address safety, operational
requirements, hours of operation, and
access requirements.

Los Altos Hills Town Hall

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
5 SURVEYING
Once the background materials have been collected, AECOM will conduct an onsite facility condition assessment. This is a rapid visual assessment and does not include areas above the ceiling or under the floor, nor will any equipment be tested.

LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENT
As a part of Level 1 assessment, a team comprised of an architect and mechanical/plumbing engineer will record high-level building information, which will be used to help the Town determine the value of the existing building as well as any major needed capital improvements. Examples of this high-level information include building type, number of floors, and the presence, age, and condition of building systems. In addition, the Level 1 assessment team confirms the floor layout and room numbering on a digitized floor plan. Finally, the team conducts an interview with a facility manager who has institutional knowledge of the building.

If no floorplans have been identified as part of pre-launch data collection and Level 1 assessments, the team will check with the site point of contact to see if floorplans or a fire exiting plan can be utilized instead. If none are available, based on the direction AECOM gets from the Town, the team can draw a conceptual floorplan on-site for an additional cost. If desired, detailed as-builts can also be created as an optional task.

Typical Level 1 Summary and System Service Life Reports

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
6 QA/QC DATA ANALYSIS
After the assessment, the team conducts a data QA/QC (Quality Assurance Quality Control) process and generates report(s) from its findings. The assessment teams are well-trained in their professional disciplines. During training, every effort is made to ensure their individual observations are well-calibrated. To create a highly consistent and accurate dataset, our experts and senior engineers in the central Home Team approve or revise code compliance findings to adhere to a centralized, consistent approach.

PROJECT COSTING
The ultimate step in the project development process is costing, completed by our team of AECOM cost estimators, experienced in generating detailed cost estimates for projects in California. Cost estimates are rough-order-of magnitude (30:30) for capital planning purposes only.

4. ENGAGEMENT:

PROJECT DELIVERABLES
Key findings from across the Community Interest Groups, Future of Work Workshop and Community Open House, and outline next steps for the Town to move to implementation.

The following report will be delivered for Town Hall:
o Level 1 Report: Building Analysis and Condition Assessment Reports highlighting the:
• Building Summary Report outlining existing building systems • Present Replacement Value detailing the like for like replacement cost of the facilities
• Costed System Service Life Report
• FCI (Facility Condition Index) Deterioration Curve

PRICING
Phase/Task Cost
Project Management $15,000

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
7 Engagement $67,000
Assessment $16,000
Total $98,000

ASSUMPTIONS
• Community Needs Assessment is Lump Sum with percent complete monthly billing basis.
• Client calls, presentations, workshops, open houses will be conducted in Microsoft Teams or Zoom
• Town of Los Altos to provide list of stakeholders and send invites for meetings/calls for Community Interest Group Interviews and Community Open Houses
• A detailed schedule will be developed upon receipt of specific building information.
• Additional Services: Should the scope of services change from those defined in the Professional Services Agreement or deviate from the original program scope, the fee for additional services will be submitted as a change order. • The AECOM assessment is a rapid visual inspection, and will not include equipment testing, destructive testing, or hazardous materials testing. Our team will not be assessing any infrastructure that is underground or in ceilings/walls. • AECOM is dependent upon Los Altos Hills to provide background information as required, including but not limited to: Environmental studies, testing, building floorplans, MEP and structural plans, permits. AECOM will not be held liable for any erroneous information found in these 3rd party reports, nor will we rely on thirdparty reports as a basis of analysis. • Gap Closure Plans and CapEx/OpEx Costs are high level, and may require additional detailed construction drawings or cost estimates for completion.

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
8 • The team will need the full cooperation of Los Altos Hills and Building-Level staff to deliver documents in advance of the assessment.
• When on site, the teams need full access to potentially restricted areas of the building. It is Los Altos Hills’ responsibility to ensure this access will occur and dedicate a Site Contact to unlock all doors and provide any on-site documentation- permits etc. If areas cannot be accessed, this will be noted, and Los Altos Hills will have to compensate the team for any needed revisits or schedule extensions incurred, and if this problem is widespread, may impact overall schedule delivery.
• This note will be included on every report: The AECOM team visited this venue on behalf of Los Altos Hills to provide input on the previously established Building Safety Standards for this facility. If building documents were not available prior to AECOM’s visit, the content of this report is based on visual observations and interviews with building representatives only. AECOM did not perform testing or destructive observations while on-site. Conditions documented here are the state of the building on the date of AECOM’s visit. Because this facility is currently occupied, conditions may have changed since the AECOM visit. The current state of the building and observed deficiencies shall be verified prior to developing mitigation or construction projects on the findings contained in this report.

EXCLUSIONS
Although we can provide these services, they are excluded from our proposal:

Infrastructure
• Facility or infrastructure conditions assessment
• Zoning, entitlements, or other land planning regulatory processes • Master planning, programming, architecture, landscape, building engineering and interior design
• Construction or pre-construction services
• Public private partnership advisory
• Real estate development advisory

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
9 OPTIONAL ASSESSMENT TASKS
If desired, there are a number of optional assessment tasks that can be performed, including taking a deeper dive within the buildings, performing assessments of the parks (sidewalks/paths, fixtures, landscaping) and parking lot assessments. Our team can develop a cost for these items if requested.

LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS (OPTIONAL)
Utilizing the information collected during the Level 1 assessments, AECOM can conduct another level of on-site assessments.

Level 2 assessments are distress-based assessments for all observable building components. As a part of the Level 2 assessments, a three-person team comprised of an architect, mechanical engineer, and electrical engineer records the finer building details. The team’s principal task will be to record deficiencies. The Level 2 assessment team recommends direct corrective actions which may influence the Town’s maintenance strategy for a particular asset.

The Level 2 assessment effort also provides real-time notification of any immediate safety concerns that are noted during the assessment and determines whether additional specialized testing is required for the building.

LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENTS ONLY: PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (OPTIONAL) Our project development process includes experienced architects, engineers, and cost estimators, who work together to bundle and cost repair projects.

This is a manual step that requires careful consideration by building professionals to evaluate and prescribe the most optimized course of action.

Project development allows deferred maintenance to be structured into holistic and efficient projects, considering associated actions that help avoid change orders during the construction process.

Project development data displays all the deficiencies within each project, their quantities, severity, actions, and costs. Each project is also given a prioritization score (out of 10), which focuses on ranking projects by the risks associated with building safety, security, and function.
o Optional Level 2: Deficiencies Report (PDF and Excel formats) o Optional Level 2: Project Development Report (PDF and Excel formats) highlighting costed, prioritized list of implementation projects

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
10 PARKS AND RECREATION ASSESSMENT (OPTIONAL)
AECOM can conduct a Level 1 and 2 assessments of Los Altos Hills’ Parks and Recreation assets separate from any buildings on site. The Level 1 assessment will record whether the system is present, year of install/last renewal and condition (good/fair/poor). Level 1 projects focus on recapitalization and major projects. Level 2 assessments will identify specific deficiencies related to deferred maintenance, and costed implementation projects will be developed to address those smaller issues.

These assessments include higher value items such as hardscape/pavement, irrigation (controllers and other visible items), lighting, electric distribution, signage, turf and grasses, drains, fences/gates/walls, liquid, gas and sanitary sewerage site utilities, water distribution, site furnishings and fountains.

Optional Level 1 Reports: Park and Recreation Assessment Reports (PDF and Excel formats) highlighting the:
• Site Summary Report outlining existing site systems
• Present Replacement Value detailing the like for like replacement cost of the site elements
• Costed System Service Life Report
Optional Level 2 Reports
• Optional Level 2: Site Deficiencies Report (PDF and Excel formats) • Optional Level 2: Site Project Development Report (PDF and Excel formats) highlighting costed, prioritized list of implementation projects PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENTS: (OPTIONAL)
AECOM can conduct on-site Level 1 and Level 2 pavement condition assessments for Los Altos Hills’ asphalt and concrete lots. Unlike facility assessments, Level 1 and Level 2 pavement condition assessments are conducted the same time. For these types of assessments, a two to threeperson team will collect all condition and distress information in the field. This team consists of one to two transportation civil engineers who will collect pavement information, and one architect to collect site conditions and civil deficiencies.

Level 1 assessments collect high-level information about the age and condition of the lots’ general pavement and site elements, rating each field a good, fair or poor rating. Examples of this high-level information include pavement type and

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
11 last repavement year, as well as the presence, condition, and age of important elements like storm drains and site lighting. Similar to building assessments, the information collected during the Level 1 assessment will be used to highlight areas of the lots that require additional attention during the Level 2 assessment.

Level 2 assessments collect finer details about the lot’s pavement condition and site deficiencies. Prior to assessment, AECOM will produce site plans with equally spaced grids, and will select random samples to perform an in-depth assessment of the variety of pavement distress types in the lot. Transportation civil engineers collect several distress samples and record their type of distress, size (density), and severity. These distress samples will later be used to calculate the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), a numerical index ranging from 0 to 100 that is used to indicate the general condition of a pavement. The architect will collect deficiencies for all site elements except for physical asphalt condition themselves. He or she may also provide any real-time notification of immediate safety concerns about the site. In addition, the architect will tag any county-owned equipment associated with the function of the lot, such as gate operators.

This is a rapid visual inspection, utilizing parametric sampling to determine overall pavement condition. AECOM’s Pavement Assessment program is based on American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard methodology and has been utilized in assessing parking lots for the remainder of Los Angeles County. No destructive testing will be performed. The civil engineers performing the work evaluate cracking patterns and depth to determine the overall condition of the pavement and bring problem areas to the attention of Los Altos Hills. A Pavement Condition Index score and degradation curves will be generated for all parking lots.

After the Level 1 and Level 2 pavement condition assessments are finished, AECOM will provide data QA, analysis and provide the following reports:

Optional Level 1 Pavement Assessment Reports:

The Level 1 assessment is a condition-based assessment, where parking lot or service yard systems are aged and rated as good, fair, poor, or not present.

Optional Level 2 Pavement Assessment Reports:

Like building assessments, after the team is finished with QA and analysis of the lots’ distresses and site deficiencies, the parking lots will go through a

Los Altos Hills Community Needs
+ Capital Planning Strategy March 7, 2022
12 similar Project Development procedure, where AECOM will develop projects by bundling distress and deficiency data from the site. The Project Development data displays all the distress samples and deficiencies within each project, their quantities, severity, actions, and costs. Typical equipment included in the barcoding exercise for parking lots includes outdoor tanks, gate motors, etc.

Each project is then costed by AECOM cost estimators.

March 4, 2022
Peter Pirnejad
City Manager
Town of Los Altos Hills
26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Re: MIG Proposal for a Community Facility Needs Assessment Dear Mr. Pirnejad:

Thank you for asking MIG to help design and facilitate an engagement process and document needs for a civic and community facility in Los Altos Hills. MIG is a national leader in park and public facility planning, with expertise in facilitating a community-driven process to identify indoor/outdoor needs and actionable strategies for creating public spaces that support. community use, town business, and recreation. We are well known for leading visioning, facilitation, consensus-building, capacity building, and public processes to unite communities around common goals. MIG works together with key stakeholders, City leaders, and staff in collaborative work efforts that are open, transparent, and inclusive. Our nationally recognized process of facilitation and consensus building is rooted in creative engagement strategies that use a broad set of traditional and cutting-edge tools.

MIG has conducted numerous strategic community engagement processes for cities, districts and other public agencies in California, across the West, and beyond. This includes civic center planning with the City of Napa, community center planning and design in Los Altos, as well as parks and recreation system planning in Palo Alto, Cupertino, and Irvine, where planning for major community facilities was part of these efforts. Descriptions of key projects are available on request.

For this project, we offer the multi-disciplinary expertise of our firmwide team of approximately 300 staff.

Key leaders for this effort include:
• Kate Joncas, Director of Urban Strategy and Development; • Cindy Mendoza, Director of Parks and Recreation; and
• Ryan Mottau, Director of Digital Engagement.

Ryan will serve as the primary point of contact and Project Manager for MIG. Resumes for each of the key team members are attached.

MIG’s proposed scope of work is designed to deliver what the Los Altos Hills staff and City Council will need to make decisions around the potential expansion of community facilities. As the project moves forward, our team will remain flexible, responding to the evolving needs of the community. Additional detail about the billing rates, amount of time per task, and anticipated cost of this work is provided in the attached budget spreadsheet.

MIG 2 , Inc.

We are excited to assist Los Altos Hills with this project and ready to move forward quickly after approval of the scope and fee. If you have any questions, please reach out to Ryan Mottau ([email protected]) or myself ([email protected]). We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,
Cindy Mendoza, CPRP
Director of Parks and Recreation
503-297-1005 x2100

MIG 3 , Inc.

Attachment A: Scope of Work

1. Project Initiation (March)
Following a notice to proceed, the MIG team will promptly schedule a meeting with the City’s Project Team to refine the project schedule, establish communications protocols, and clarify any remaining questions. The MIG team will also review any further background documents or information surfaced by the team.

Deliverables:
• Project Team Initiation Meeting
• Background Information Review/Community Reconnaissance

2. Community Engagement (April – June)
MIG will define a community engagement strategy and provide a memo for City review. This will include key information about the audiences, information needs, methods, schedule, and target outcomes. As part of this task we anticipate offering the following: consultation on one or two planned City-wide surveys using Flashvote; two town hall-style meetings facilitated in a digital format with a component for those who cannot attend; a committee and community input toolkit to assist City staff in involving the City’s standing committees and diverse community groups; and a series of up to 10 stakeholder interviews for one-on-one interaction with key influencers. MIG will provide collective summary of all engagement activities to identify unique cross-cutting themes and community priorities across all activities.

Deliverables:
• Engagement Strategy Memo
• Flashvote survey design consultation
• Town Hall Meetings (2), including agenda, digital meeting format, and materials for posting to City website.
• Committee & Community Input Toolkit
• Stakeholder Interviews (10)
• Consolidated summary memo of community engagement findings

3. City Council Engagement (March – August)
The project team will keep the City Council informed throughout the project by providing an update at each Council meeting while the project is active. MIG will provide five updates in document (pdf) or presentation (PowerPoint) form to encourage City Council members to ask questions and provide any additional context or guidance to contribute to the project. MIG will present these updates to Council (via video meeting) in three meetings.

Deliverables:
• Update Materials (5 written updates)
• Presentation to Council (3 meetings)

4. City Staff Engagement (April – July)
MIG will work with the City’s selected architect to develop an understanding of the needs of City staff for office and meeting space. MIG will develop a short survey for all staff to provide initial input on the current and anticipated needs for working space. Using information on comparable work spaces (provided

MIG 4 , Inc.
by the City’s architect), MIG will analyze survey results within the context of typical needs in similar communities. The project team will keep City staff updated along with targeted questions that tap into the professional staff members’ knowledge of the community.

Deliverables:
• Coordination meeting with City selected architect
• Working space needs survey
• Comparison to standards for civic/community space in similar communities (standards provided by City contracted architects)

5. Community Facilities Needs Assessment Report (July – August) Combining the input of the community, City Council, staff and the technical knowledge of the project team, MIG will draft a summary assessment of needs to expand or create an indoor/outdoor public space that serves community gathering, recreation, and City business needs. This draft will also include general approaches to meeting each of these needs, based on the developed understanding of Los Altos Hills. The draft will be delivered to the City staff on the project team for review, with an opportunity for one round of consolidated comments before delivery to City Council for consideration. The final report will be prepared following any comments or revisions by City Council.

Deliverables:
• Administrative Draft Report
• Council Draft Report
• Final Report

6. Project Management and Administration (5 months)
MIG will maintain regular communication, as established in the Project Initiation phase, which will include schedule, budget updates, and invoicing. The budgeted resources in this phase of work assumes 5 months of project duration.

Deliverables:
• Monthly invoicing and communications
• Organized and packaged project files

Los Altos Hill Community Facilities Needs Assessment
Process Schedule
1: Project Scope &
Contracting
2: Community
Outreach Plan
Development
3: Community Outreach
Implementation
Next Steps
(Pending City
Council
Direction)
4: Community Outreach Results
and Final Report
City Council Engagement
March 17, 2022
Review Proposed
Scope and Process
April 21, 2022
Council update:
• Community
Engagement Plan
May 19, 2022
Council update
presentation:
• Community
Engagement
• Town Hall space
needs analysis
August 18, 2022
Council update
presentation:
• Council draft
report
• Approaches to
meeting needs
• Council
Direction on
Project
Project Team &
City Staff
Engagement
Community
Engagement April
 Flashvote Survey
 Committee &
Community
Input Toolkit
April
 Project Kickoff
 Review Flashvote
Survey #2
 Working Space Survey
May
 Project Team
Coordination
 Working Space
Survey Results
June
 Committee and
Stakeholder
meetings
July - August
 Project Team
Coordination
 Administrative
draft report
March April May - June July-August
June
 Project Team
Coordination
 Town Meeting #1
results
July
 Town Hall
Meeting #2
May
 Meetings with
Committees and
Stakeholders
 Town Hall
Meeting #1
 Town Hall
Extension -
questions/video
June 16, 2022
Council update:
• Community
Engagement
July 21, 2022
Council update
presentation:
• Review Results
of Community
Engagement
• Needs Analysis
 Confirmation of
Project Goals
 Review Flashvote
Survey #1
 Engagement
Strategy
Development

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
» Park and Recreation
Planning
» Recreation Programming
» Community Needs
Assessment
» Recreation Trends

EDUCATION
» MA, Geography, (Teaching
Fellowship), University of
Oregon
» BS, Geography (Honors
Scholar), minors in
Environmental Studies and
English, James Madison
University

REGISTRATIONS
» NRPA Certified Park and
Recreation Professional

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
» Certified Park and
Recreation Professional
» California SCORP Advisory
Focus Group
AWARDS
» CPRS Creating Community
Award for Excellence, Apple
Valley Parks and Recreation
Master Plan, 2014
» ORPA Vision Insight
Planning Award, Gresham
Parks & Recreation, Trails
and Natural Areas Master
Plan, 2010
» Park Facility Development
Guidelines, Irvine, CA
» Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
Apple Valley, CA
» Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
Arcata, CA
» Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
Sunnyvale, CA
» Parks, Trails and Recreation Master
Plan, South Lake Tahoe, CA
» Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
Murray, UT
» Parks and Recreation System Plan,
Cupertino, CA
» Parks, Recreation, and Open Lands
Plan, Loveland, CO
» Park Development Ordinance and
Site Selection Criteria, Parker, CO
» Park Dedication and Development
Standards, Amarillo, TX
Cindy Mendoza, CPRP

DIRECTOR, PARK AND RECREATION
Cindy Mendoza’s leadership and award-winning expertise in park and recreation planning is a catalyst for community livability across the nation. Her affinity for developing parks and programs began 35 years ago as a recreation leader and soccer coach for underserved kids in her community. Through this work, she saw firsthand the life-changing benefits of parks, programs, and natural areas to youth and their families. Clients and colleagues find Cindy to be a solutionoriented pragmatist, working collaboratively to strategize the right mix of programs, facilities, and policies to maximize resources and meet each community’s unique needs. As a writer and facilitator, she brings together diverse perspectives, synthesizing outreach findings and technical data to articulate desired outcomes and support action. An authority in the field, she has published and spoken extensively at the state and national level on the evolution of parks and recreation and its contributions to community livability. As MIG’s Director of Parks and Recreation, Cindy offers best practices and the capacity to make all communities thrive though people, parks, and programs.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
» Parks and Recreation Master Plan
(ORPA Planning Award),
Tualatin, OR
» Tualatin Basalt Creek Recreation
Plan, Tualatin, OR
» Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
Master Plan, SDCs, and Rogers Park
Design, Forest Grove, OR
» Recreational Programs Plan,
Tigard, OR
» Parks and Recreation Master Plan
(CPRS Award for Excellence),
Apple Valley, CA
» Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
Master Plan, West Linn, OR
» Park Master Plan for New
Developments, Tracy, CA
» Parks and Recreation, Trails, and
Natural Areas Master Plan (ORPA
Vision, Insight, Planning Award),
Gresham, OR

EDUCATION
» BBA, Urban Geography
joint major, Simon Fraser
University, Burnaby, British
Columbia

PRESENTATIONS
» Out’Reach: Beyond
the Usual Limits of
Engagement, NRPA 2015
» Go Big or Go Home!
Creating Successful
Destination Venues, NRPA
2013, 2014
» Reinvigorating the Mature
Park and Recreation
System, NRPA 2013, 2014
» Why Can’t We Play Here?
and ¼ Mile to What and
Where?, NRPA 2012

DIGITAL TOOL PROFICIENCY
(SELECTED)
» Zoom
» Maptionnaire Map-based
Survey
» Lime Survey
» Google Forms
» Survey Monkey
» Wufoo
» OpenGov
Ryan Mottau

DIRECTOR OF DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT
Ryan Mottau is a national expert in recreation and public facility planning who has prepared system plans that develop and improve park, trail, recreation, and education facilities for communities around the country. The potential of parks and recreation to enhance urban livability drew Ryan to this area of specialization. The emerging consensus about parks, recreation, and natural spaces as important contributors to urban economics, environmental impacts, and physical and mental health pushes him forward. He creatively adapts and applies community engagement and data collection tools—such as online platforms that increase turnout and broaden outreach—to test community priorities, evaluate park and recreation services, and gather valuable input for action-oriented decision making. As a project manager, Ryan combines his extensive content knowledge—drawing upon 18 years of project experience and continuous tracking of national and international trends—with skillful process design, facilitation, and analysis to ensure that communities develop politically and financially feasible implementation plans.

RELATED EXPERIENCE
» SACOG Regional Trails Plan
Interactive Map Engagement,
Sacramento, CA
» Parks, Recreation and Open
Space Master Plan, Palo Alto, CA
» Online Engagement for Inclusive
Play Area Design, Hillsboro, OR
» Equity in Parks and Recration
Survey, Bend Park and Recreation
District, Bend, OR
» Online Priorities Workshop,
Sherwood PRMP, OR
» Parks and Recreation Community
Questionnaire, Tukwila, WA
» Parks, Recreation, Open Space
and Natural Resources Plan,
Renton, WA
» Pasadena Community College
Education Master Plan Outreach,
Pasadena, CA
» Rhody Rising Main Street
Redevelopment Plan Online
Questionnaire,
Clackamas County, OR
» Denver Play Strategy
Questionnaire, Denver, CO
» Recreation Survey & Community
Recreation Questionnaire, Coeur
d’Alene, ID
» Sonoma County Integrated Parks
Plan Questionnaire,
Sonoma County, CA
» San José Greenprint, Trails
Strategic Plan, San José, CA
» Stevens Creek Interactive
Mapping Outreach, Cupertino,
CA
» Education Master Plan Outreach,
Pasadena, CA

Kate Joncas

EDUCATION
» BS, Community Sciences,
University of WisconsinGreen Bay, Cum Laude

SELECT COMMUNITY

ENGAGEMENT
» Bellwether Housing Board
of Trustees (current)
» Seattle Community Police
Commission (2012 – 2014)

PRESENTATIONS
» IDA Webinar “Connecting
with Downtown
Neighborhoods
» ULI Webinar “Sustaining
Downtowns Post COVID”
» IDA Master Talk: “Alexa,
What Happened to My
City?”
Kate Joncas is an urban development expert with a proven track record of implementation. By fostering public and private sector collaboration, she designs innovative strategies that address complex problems in urban areas of all sizes. As Seattle Deputy Mayor, she led waterfront redevelopment and the negotiations for the Convention Center expansion. While CEO of the Downtown Seattle Association, she led one of the most successful revitalization projects in the country, including advocacy for two Convention Center additions. She has successfully tackled a wide range of challenges facing communities in an era of rapid change and rising disparity.

As MIG’s Director of Urban Strategy and Development, Kate offers her finely honed expertise and skills as a facilitator and strategist to bring people of different backgrounds and perspectives together in defining and pursuing a shared strategic vision to improve their communities. Her intimate knowledge of public, private, and nonprofit sectors; urban project management; real estate development; governance; and decision-making combined with her deep experience in stakeholder engagement and politics enables her to interact with all parties of interest. She is active in the international downtown community and sits on boards and commissions in service to the profession.

DIRECTOR OF URBAN STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT

RELATED EXPERIENCE
» Long Beach Development
Corporation Strategic Plan,
Long Beach, CA
» City of Seattle, Strategic Advisor,
Business Improvement Districts,
Seattle, WA
» Central Houston, Future Priorities
Presentation and Work Session,
Houston, TX
» Strategic Advisory Services and
Implementation of the City of
Napa/Civic Center Campus
Project,
Napa, CA
» Downtown Kansas City 2030
Strategic Plan, Kansas, MO
» South Park Los Angeles Strategic
Plan, Los Angeles, CA
» Olympia Downtown Alliance
Business District Strategy,
Olympia, WA
» Results for America, Research
on Performance Metrics for
Workforce Development
Programs
» Downtown Sacramento
Partnership Strategic Plan,
Sacramento, CA
» Green River College Equity
Centered Strategic Vision,
Auburn, WA
» Third Street Promenade
Stabilization and Economic
Vitality Plan, Santa Monica, CA

Attachment B: Estimated Project Cost
Los Altos Hills I COMMUNITY FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT Hrs@ $185 Hrs@ $165 Hrs@ $250 Hrs@ $105
Task 1: Project Initiation

1.1 Project Team Initiation Meeting 2 $370 2 $330 2 $500 2 $210 8 $1,410 $1,410

1.2 Background Information Review/Community Reconnaissance 2 $370 2 $330 1 $250 8 $840 13 $1,790 $1,790 Subtotal 4 $740 4 $660 3 $750 10 $1,050 21 $3,200 $0 $3,200 Task 2: Community Engagement

2.1 Engagement Strategy 2 $370 8 $1,320 2 $500 8 $840 20 $3,030 $3,030

2.2 Survey Design Consultation 2 $370 6 $990 2 $500 $0 10 $1,860 $1,860

2.3 Town Hall Meeting #1 4 $740 8 $1,320 4 $1,000 8 $840 24 $3,900 $200 $4,100

2.4 Town Hall Meeting #2 4 $740 8 $1,320 4 $1,000 8 $840 24 $3,900 $200 $4,100

2.5 Committee & Community Input Toolkit 4 $740 6 $990 $0 12 $1,260 22 $2,990 $200 $3,190

2.6 Stakeholder Interviews (10) 6 $1,110 $0 4 $1,000 5 $525 15 $2,635 $2,635

2.7 Community Engagement Findings Summary 2 $370 4 $660 2 $500 24 $2,520 32 $4,050 $4,050 Subtotal 24 $4,440 40 $6,600 18 $4,500 65 $6,825 147 $22,365 $600 $22,965 Task 3: City Council Engagement

3.1 Update Materials (5 meetings) 3 $555 3 $495 6 $1,500 12 $1,260 24 $3,810 $3,810

3.2 Presentation by Project Team (3 meetings) 3 $555 3 $495 3 $750 $0 9 $1,800 $1,800 Subtotal 6 $1,110 6 $990 9 $2,250 12 $1,260 33 $5,610 $0 $5,610 Task 4: City Staff Engagement

4.1 Coordination with Selected Architect 2 $370 4 $660 2 $500 $0 8 $1,530 $1,530

4.2 Working Space Needs Survey $0 8 $1,320 $0 16 $1,680 24 $3,000 $200 $3,200

4.3 Comparison to Standards $0 2 $330 $0 12 $1,260 14 $1,590 $1,590 Subtotal 2 $370 14 $2,310 2 $500 28 $2,940 46 $6,120 $200 $6,320 Task 5: Community Facilities Needs Assessment Report

5.1 Synthesis of Community, Recreation and Business Needs 6 $1,110 8 $1,320 6 $1,500 12 $1,260 32 $5,190 $5,190

5.2 Administrative Draft Report 4 $740 8 $1,320 4 $1,000 32 $3,360 48 $6,420 $6,420

5.3 Council Draft Report 2 $370 2 $330 2 $500 8 $840 14 $2,040 $2,040

5.4 Final Report 2 $370 2 $330 2 $500 8 $840 14 $2,040 $2,040 Subtotal 14 $2,590 20 $3,300 14 $3,500 60 $6,300 108 $15,690 $0 $15,690 Task 6: Project Management and Administration

6.1 Five Months of Project Management and Administration 10 $1,850 15 $2,475 $0 10 $1,050 35 $5,375 $5,375

6.2 Project Close-Out $0 2 $330 $0 2 $210 4 $540 $540
Subtotal 10 $1,850 17 $2,805 0 $0 12 $1,260 39 $5,915 $0 $5,915 60 $11,100 101 $16,665 46 $11,500 187 $19,635 394 $58,900 $800 $59,700 10% Markup (Direct Costs/Administrative) $80 $80
$59,780
e s t i m a t e d p r o j e c t c o s t
MIG, Inc.

Director of Parks
and Recreation
Ryan Mottau Kate Joncas
Director of Digital
Engagement
Director of Urban
Strategy and
Development
Project Associate
Cindy Mendoza
Note: Meetings and research are anticipated to be completed remotely to maximize reach and efficiency.

Direct costs reflected here are technology costs to access a range of tools from video conferencing to online surveys provided by MIG.

Cost for accomodation requests or translation will be the responsiblity of the City of Los Altos Hills, MIG can assist in arranging and designing to maximize inclusion in meetings and activities.

MIG
Direct
Costs
Professional
Fees
Totals
MIG
Totals

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
MIG, Inc. Los Altos Hills - Community Facilities Needs Assessment | Fee Proposal

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS June 16, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
________________________________________________________________________ SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS

HILLS REQUESTING THAT THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY TAX
COLLECTOR COLLECT DELINQUENT SEWER CHARGES, THE FY 2022- 23 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT

DISTRICT CHARGES FOR BOTH THE PALO ALTO AND LOS ALTOS

SEWER BASINS
FROM: Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director
APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
_______________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution for the sewer tax roll to be forwarded to the Santa Clara County Tax Collector for collection.

DISCUSSION:

On May 25, 2022, the City Council set the annual sewer service charge for both Palo Alto and Los Altos Sewer Basins through the adoption of Resolution No. 59-22. (See Attachment 3) Also, five properties within the approved Eastbrook Subdivision Tract 5801 Contractual Assessment District No. 2010-1 are required to pay $1,887.36 each pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement between the Town and neighbors for the Eastbrook Sanitary Sewer Diversion Project.

Staff recommends that the attached resolution be approved by the City Council.

These fees are paid through the Santa Clara County property tax bills. The Santa Clara County Tax Collector requires a City Council resolution each year, requesting that these fees be collected through the County’s tax billing and collection system. Staff has prepared the necessary schedule which will be sent with the resolution to the County for collection.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This action does not qualify as a “Project” as defined in California Government Code Section 15378(b) of the Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act. 2022 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

Although not specifically called out in the 2022 City Council strategic priorities this effort is considered part of our day-to-day activity.

AGENDA ITEM #6.A

Staff Report to City Council Page 2
Sewer Tax Roll
June 16, 2022
FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact on approval of this action will result in collection of approximately $3.29 million in revenue and has been included in the Proposed FY 2022-23 Sewer Fund Budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proposed Resolution

2. List of Proposed Sewer Service Charges and Contractual Assessment District Charges

3. Resolution 59-22

RESOLUTION -22

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN

OF LOS ALTOS HILLS REQUESTING THAT THE SANTA

CLARA COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR COLLECT
DELINQUENT SEWER CHARGES, THE 2022-23 SEWER

SERVICE CHARGES, AND CONTRACTUAL

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CHARGES FOR BOTH THE

PALO ALTO AND LOS ALTOS SEWER BASINS
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2022, the City Council set the annual sewer service charge for both the Palo Alto and Los Altos Sewer Basins through the adoption of Resolution No. 59-22; and, WHEREAS, a schedule, including assessor parcel numbers and amount to be collected has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Clara County Tax Collector requires an adopted resolution of the City Council prior to enrollment of the sewer service charges on the property tax bill.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby RESOLVE that the City Council approves the schedule of charges incorporated into this Resolution by reference as Attachment 2 to the Staff Report for this Resolution, and requests the Santa Clara County Tax Collector to collect delinquent sewer charges, the 2022-23 sewer service charges and contractual assessment district charges.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of June 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
George Tyson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Deborah Padovan, City Clerk
Attachment 1

OFFICE LOCATIONS:

Temecula – Corporate Headquarters
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
San Francisco – Regional Office
870 Market Street, Suite 1223
San Francisco, CA 94102
California Satellite Offices
Atascadero, Davis
Huntington Beach,
Joshua Tree, Riverside
Sacramento, San Jose
www.nbsgov.com
Prepared by:

Listing of Sewer Service Charges and
Eastbrook Sewer Loan Agreement
Fiscal Year 2022/23
June 2022
Attachment 2

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
175-03-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-041 1 1,643.00 721.92 2,364.92
175-03-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-047 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-03-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-03-052 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-04-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-04-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-005 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-05-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-020 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-05-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-05-031 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-06-003 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-06-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-06-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-06-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-06-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-06-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-06-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-06-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-08-002 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-08-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-08-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-08-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-08-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-08-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-08-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-10-002 1.5 2,464.50 1796.3 4,260.80
175-10-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-10-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-10-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-075 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-084 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-21-088 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-089 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-090 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-091 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-092 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-21-094 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-095 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-096 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-098 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-102 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-21-103 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-105 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-107 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-110 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-111 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-113 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-21-114 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-013 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-22-014 1 1,643.00 471.37 2,114.37
175-22-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-22-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-007 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-23-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-23-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-049 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-23-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-058 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-23-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-23-073 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-23-074 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-23-075 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-24-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-010 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-24-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-24-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-037 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-24-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-050 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-24-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-057 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-24-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-062 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-24-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-24-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-016 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-25-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-25-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-044 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-25-045 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-25-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-057 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-25-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-25-070 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-26-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-013 1 1,643.00 1843.01 3,486.01
175-26-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-26-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-27-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-27-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-27-016 1 1,643.00 331.23 1,974.23
175-27-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-27-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-27-057 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-27-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-002 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-28-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-015 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-28-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-018 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-28-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-025 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-28-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-28-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-29-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-29-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-29-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-29-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-29-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-001 2.33 3,828.19 0 3,828.19
175-32-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-023 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-32-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-32-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-046 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-32-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-056 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-32-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-059 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-32-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-32-062 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-33-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-012 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-33-013 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-33-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-33-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-073 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-075 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-33-076 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-34-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-017 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-34-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-34-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-027 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-34-028 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-34-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-051 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-34-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-34-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-34-069 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-34-070 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-35-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-009 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-35-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-023 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-35-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-033 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-35-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-036 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-35-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-35-039 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-35-041 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-36-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-039 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-36-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-042 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-36-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-36-047 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-37-016 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-37-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-37-027 1.5 2,464.50 1694.38 4,158.88
175-37-037 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-37-038 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-38-007 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-38-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-034 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-38-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-38-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-39-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-39-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-39-021 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-39-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-006 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-40-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-40-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-026 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-40-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-40-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-021 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-42-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-032 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-42-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-060 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-42-062 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-42-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-42-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-42-065 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-43-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-43-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-43-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-43-045 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-43-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-43-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-43-050 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-43-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-43-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-026 1 1,643.00 1826.03 3,469.03
175-44-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-040 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-44-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-058 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-44-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-44-071 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-44-073 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-046 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-45-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-055 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-45-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-071 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-45-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-46-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-46-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-037 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-47-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-047 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-47-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-47-051 1 1,643.00 1104.11 2,747.11
175-48-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-076 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-077 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-080 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-081 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-082 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-083 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-48-084 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-010 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-49-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-49-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-49-025 1 1,643.00 203.84 1,846.84
175-49-026 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-49-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-50-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-50-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-50-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-50-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-52-001 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-52-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-52-004 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-52-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-52-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-52-009 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-53-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-006 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-53-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-028 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-53-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-53-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-007 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-54-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-015 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-54-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-54-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-047 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-54-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-071 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-075 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-076 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-080 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-081 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-54-082 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-54-083 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-005 1 1,643.00 1159.32 2,802.32
175-55-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
175-55-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-55-049 8.07 13,259.01 0 13,259.01
175-56-005 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-56-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-56-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-57-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
175-57-013 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
175-57-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-03-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-04-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-04-091 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-04-092 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-017 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-06-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-06-023 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-06-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-048 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-06-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-06-066 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-06-067 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-07-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-020 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-07-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-042 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-07-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-07-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-056 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-07-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-060 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-07-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-07-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-08-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-09-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-09-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-09-045 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-10-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-10-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-10-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-10-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-10-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-10-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-10-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-11-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-11-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-11-082 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-13-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-13-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-15-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-022 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-16-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-16-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-050 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-16-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-16-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-054 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-17-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-17-072 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-17-073 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-17-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-044 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-18-045 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-18-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-18-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-19-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-19-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-19-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-20-043 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-20-060 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-23-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-008 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-23-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-23-042 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-23-044 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-23-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-24-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-24-012 7.97 13,094.71 0 13,094.71
182-25-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-25-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-019 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-26-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-26-030 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-26-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-26-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-026 1 1,643.00 1550 3,193.00
182-28-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-28-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-010 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-31-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-042 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-31-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-31-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-059 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-31-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-075 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-31-076 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-31-079 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-32-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-39-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-39-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-39-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-002 1.5 2,464.50 2388.7 4,853.20
182-41-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-006 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-41-007 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-41-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-41-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-42-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-038 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-42-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-046 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-42-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-42-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-45-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-45-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-47-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-48-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-48-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-50-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-042 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-50-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-50-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-017 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-52-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-52-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-53-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-53-002 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
182-53-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-53-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-53-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-53-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
182-53-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
182-53-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-026 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-01-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-01-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-079 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-094 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-096 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-097 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-098 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-099 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-100 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-102 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-104 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
331-02-105 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-106 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-107 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-108 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-109 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-110 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-112 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-113 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-114 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-116 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-119 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-120 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-121 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-122 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-123 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-124 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-125 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-02-126 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-002 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-05-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-05-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-14-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
331-15-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-15-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-084 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-096 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-097 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-098 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-110 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-111 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-113 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-118 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-128 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-129 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-132 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-133 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-134 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-135 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-16-140 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-027 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-17-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
331-17-065 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-17-072 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-17-073 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-075 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-079 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-080 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-081 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-17-083 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-061 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-064 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
331-20-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-071 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-075 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-20-076 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-077 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-079 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-20-080 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-21-002 1.5 2,464.50 1299.45 3,763.95
331-21-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-21-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-21-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-21-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-21-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-002 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-24-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-005 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-24-006 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-24-007 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-24-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-010 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-24-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
331-24-015 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
331-24-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-15-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-15-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-15-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-15-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-17-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-044 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-045 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-17-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-17-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-018 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-18-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-18-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-037 1.5 2,464.50 6516.37 8,980.87
336-19-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-19-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-19-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-22-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-22-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-22-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-22-034 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-22-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-22-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-23-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-23-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-23-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-23-017 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-23-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-23-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-24-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-24-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-24-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-24-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-24-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-24-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-019 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-25-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-022 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-25-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-025 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-032 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-25-047 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-051 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-25-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-020 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-26-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-26-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-27-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-28-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-058 1 1,643.00 1592.47 3,235.47
336-28-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-066 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-28-070 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-28-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-29-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-024 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-035 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-037 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-046 1 1,643.00 1698.63 3,341.63
336-30-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-054 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-057 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-058 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-059 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-060 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-30-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-068 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-071 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-073 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-075 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-076 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-077 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-079 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-082 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-083 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-084 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-085 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-086 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-087 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-30-088 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-31-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-31-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-31-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-31-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-31-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-026 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-029 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-033 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-040 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-045 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-046 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-32-049 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-050 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-052 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-067 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-069 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-072 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-074 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-075 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-081 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-089 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-091 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-32-092 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-34-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-34-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-34-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-34-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-34-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-34-021 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-34-022 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-35-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-080 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-081 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-35-083 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-36-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-36-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-36-030 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-36-034 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-38-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-38-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-38-025 1 1,643.00 1991.64 3,634.64
336-38-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-38-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-38-041 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-38-042 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-38-048 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-39-031 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-021 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-036 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-038 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-039 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-043 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-053 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-055 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-056 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-062 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-063 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-065 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-066 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-078 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-081 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-082 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-084 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-088 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-092 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-094 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-095 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-101 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-102 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-103 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-104 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-40-107 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-41-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-016 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-41-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-019 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-020 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-022 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-026 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-41-027 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-41-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-42-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-42-015 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-42-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-42-023 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-42-027 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-42-028 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-42-029 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-43-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-015 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-43-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-001 1.5 2,464.50 0 2,464.50
336-45-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-45-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
336-46-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-46-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-47-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
336-48-014 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-03-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-03-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-03-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-03-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-03-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-001 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-002 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-003 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-004 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00

APN EDU 2022/23 Charge Prorated Connection
Charge
Total 2022/23
Levy
Town of Los Altos Hills
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll
351-33-005 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-007 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-008 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-33-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-006 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-009 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-010 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-011 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-012 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-013 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-016 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-017 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
351-37-018 1 1,643.00 0 1,643.00
Total: 1,989.87 $3,269,356.41 $28,188.77 $3,297,545.18

APN Total 2022/23 Levy
331-24-010 1,887.36
331-24-013 1,887.36
331-24-014 1,887.36
331-24-015 1,887.36
331-24-017 1,887.36
Total: $9,436.80
Town of Los Altos Hills
Eastbrook Sewer Loan Agreement
Fiscal Year 2022/23 Assessment Roll

RESOLUTION 59- 22

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS

INCREASING SEWER SERVICE CHARGES IN BOTH THE PALO ALTO AND LOS

ALTOS SEWER BASINS
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code and state law, the Town imposes sewer service charges on users ofthe Town' s public wastewater collection, transmission and disposal system. The purpose of these charges is to generate sufficient revenues to: pay the annual cost of administering, operating and maintaining the Town' s wastewater collection system, pay the charges levied by the City of Los Altos and the City of Palo Alto for sewage transmission, treatment, and disposal services, develop sufficient reserves to fund needed improvements to the Town' s system and to provide for unforeseen emergencies, and pay for other lawful obligations and expenses of the Town;
WHEREAS, the Town retained the services of HF& H Constultants, LLC ( HF& H) to prepare an analysis of the adequacy ofthe Town' s existing sewer service charges. HF& H completed a study recommending increases in the Town' s existing sewer service charges in order to cover the Town' s obligations, costs, and expenses relating to the wastewater collection system. The Town Council preliminarily approved and adopted the study at its meeting on March 17, 2022; and WHEREAS, the basis upon which the amount of the fee or charge was calculated is the following: The Sewer Fund is an Enterprise Fund that is self-supporting activity and which provides service on a user charge basis to residences and businesses. Sewer Service Charges are set to recover revenues sufficient to adequately fund sewer utility operations, maintenance, and capital replacement expenditures, while keeping rates as competitive as possible and maintaining a prudent level of reserves. The charge is for a " Unit of Service" and is the basic charge for treating wastewater for the typical single- family residence; and WHEREAS, the Town has compiled with all legal requirements in adopting the sewer service charge, including, but not limited to, California Constitution Article XIIID, Section 6. The Town provided 45 days mailed notice to the parcel owners that would be subject to the increased rates, of a public hearing to consider the proposed sewer service charge rates and to receive protests against the proposal. The public hearing was held on May 25, 2022. The Town Council heard and considered any objections or protests at the hearing. A majority of owners of parcels did not submit written protests against the proposed sewer service charge rates at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Town' s sewer service charge rates were last adjusted approximately 7 years ago. Since that time, the costs of maintaining the Town' s collection system has substantially increased, necessitating a rate increase. Additionally, the Town anticipates increased spending on capital improvement projects over the next several years. Without the proposed rate increases, the Town' s sewer fund would not have sufficient revenues in future years to meet operating expenses and capital obligations; and
Resolution 59- 22 Page 1
Attachment 3

WHEREAS, the Town Council finds and determines that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15273 since the action is the adoption of a fee or charge for the purposes set forth in that section.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does resolve as follows:

The annual sewer service charge in both the Palo Alto and Los Altos sewer basins shall be 1, 643 for FY 2022/ 23, $ 1, 742 for FY 2023/ 24, $ 1, 846 for FY 2024/ 25, $ 1, 957 for FY 2025/ 26 and $ 2, 035 for FY 2026/ 27 per single- family dwelling equivalent, until amended by subsequent Town action.

2. The City Clerk is directed to file with the County the information required by Los Altos Hills Municipal Code section 6- 4. 309.

3. Ifthe sewer service charge established in this Resolution is invalidated, the sewer service charges in effect prior to the adoption of this Resolution shall be in effect.

The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a special meeting held on the 25th day of May 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Tyson, Tankha, Mok, Schmidt, Swan
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None 4L_
BY:

George Ty, n, Ma r
ATTEST:
eborah Padovan, City Clerk
Resolution 59- 22 Page 2

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS June 16, 2022
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED FY 2022-23 OPERATING BUDGET AND FY 2023-27 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PLAN BUDGET AND GANN LIMIT FOR THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS
HILLS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FY 2022-23 SALARY

SCHEDULE
FROM: Sarina Revillar, Administrative Services Director APPROVED: Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached resolution adopting the Town’s FY 2022-23 Operating and FY 2023- 27 Five-Year Capital Budget and the Gann Appropriations Limit

2. Adopt the attached resolution adopting the Town’s FY 2022-23 Salary Schedule DISCUSSION:

The budget is an annual planning tool that communicates priorities and sets the Town’s operating and spending policy for the year. The City Manager is responsible for presenting a budget to the City Council, in accordance with Municipal Code 2-3.219. The objective of the budget is to ensure that there are enough funds to meet ongoing spending needs. The FY 2022-23 budget includes $1.82 million revenue over expenditures in the General Fund. There is $2.22 million allocated from the unassigned reserve is for capital expenditures. Sewer Fund is budgeted to use reserves in the amount of $653,966 to fund its capital improvement program.

Budget Process
The budget process begins during the second half of each fiscal year. Key priorities are discussed by City Council members and staff, and each department aligns their FY 2022-23 objectives to these priorities. Key priorities identified are: Maintain Quality of Life and Community Character, Promote Public Safety, Increase Effective Service Delivery & Governance, and Protect & Maintain Infrastructure.

Estimated actual results for the FY 2022-23 fiscal year have been projected, and this provided a foundation for the development of the budget for fiscal year FY 2022-23, in addition, to incorporate costs to fulfill the City Councils Strategic Priorities.

At a joint Budget Study Session on May 26, 2022, the proposed FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget was presented to the City Council and the FIC. The proposed budget presented includes AGENDA ITEM #6.B

Staff Report to City Council Page 2
Proposed FY 2022-23 Budget
June 16, 2022
budget recommendations according to the 2022 City Council Priorities and capital improvement program requests.

Summary of Joint Budget Study Session
The proposed FY 2022-23 budget includes spending for ongoing capital projects for the following:
$1.4 million for the Annual Road Rehabilitation project and $1.2 million for Sewer Rehabilitation Capital improvements. The Staff presented to City Council and to the FIC the proposed FY 2022- 23 Operating Budget and the FY2023-2027 Capital Improvement Plan.

After discussion of the proposed FY 2022-23 budget, City Council gave direction to include the following items in the proposed operating budget:
 Add additional $20,000 to Community Services Agency for a total of $25,000  Add $5,000 for the Los Altos Community Foundation for a total of $5,000  Add additional $1,000 to Friends of Deer Hollow Farms for a total of $6,000  Add additional $5,000 for the conversion of one motorcycle unit to a patrol vehicle unit and move $145,032 from Public Safety (General Fund 011) to COPS (021 Fund) The net change to the General Fund is $119,032 and additional $150,032 to the COPS fund.

Additional changes to Capital Projects:
 Add $81,896 to Concession Stand at Purissima Park, as previously approved at City Council meeting on May 25, 2022
 Remove $80,000 from FY 2022-23 EV Charging Station and add to the FY2021-22 prior appropriation
 Change $500,000 from the General Fund to Storm Drain for Matadero Creek The net change to the Capital Projects fund is $1,896.

Staff made the above changes and included the adjustments in FY 2022-23 Financial Summaries, Department Narratives, and FY2023-27 Capital Improvement Plan Funding Sources and Summary in attachment 3.

The City Council and FIC discussed the following Equipment Replacement, Capital Projects, and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) projects:

Staff Report to City Council Page 3
Proposed FY 2022-23 Budget
June 16, 2022

GENERAL FUND - EQUIPMENT AMOUNT
Bucket Truck Replacement $ 160,000
16ft Tilt Deck Trailer-Replacement $ 18,000
Tractor and attachments for Trail Work on
Pathways
$ 60,000
Spreader for Purissima Park $ 21,000
General Fund-Equipment Total $ 259,000

KEY INITIATIVE CAPITAL PROJECTS AMOUNT
Byrne Preserve Restoration $ 94,620
Cable System $ 50,000
Improvements to Town
Facilities
Council Chambers HVAC $ 70,000
Improvements to Town
Facilities
Corp Yard Site Improvements $ 50,000
Concession Stand at Purissima Park $ 81,896
Fremont to Redwood Grove $ 10,000
Implement Climate Action
Plan
Generator Replacement & Electrical Panel
Upgrade $ 300,000
Improvements to Town
Facilities
Heritage House Upgrade-Inside $ 400,000
Update Housing Element Housing Element-CEQA $ 400,000
10 Pathway Segments Misc. Pathways $ 325,000
Emerging Technology Technology Misc. Projects $ 100,000 Improvements to Town
Facilities
Purissima Park Improvement Program (Field &
Facility Improvements) $ 70,000
Improvements to Town
Facilities
Street Sign Replacements $ 14,000
Annual Road Rehabilitation Program $ 1,356,300
Annual Sanitary Sewer Replacement Rehab $ 1,170,350
Matadero Creek Erosion $ 500,000
Water Well Purissima Park $ 40,000
Water Well at WWB $ 40,000
Westwind Community Barn Improvements $ 140,000
Capital Projects Total $ 5,212,166

Staff Report to City Council Page 4
Proposed FY 2022-23 Budget
June 16, 2022
KEY INITIATIVE American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
Projects
AMOUNT
Broadband Infrastructure $ 800,000
Improvements to Town
Facilities Corp Yard Site Improvements $ 100,000
Improvements to Town
Facilities Town Hall Furniture & Space Upgrade $ 250,000 O’Keefe and Purissima Sewer Pumps $ 66,650
ARPA Funds Total $ 1,216,650
Resolution
The accompanying resolutions includes adoption of both the FY 2022-23 Operating Budget, the FY 2023-2027 Capital Budget and the Gann Appropriations Limit, in addition, the FY 2022-23 Salary Schedule.

The Town is required by the State Constitution, Article XIIIB (Proposition 4) to annually calculate the maximum amount of appropriations subject to limitation. The calculation is intended to limit the annual growth in tax revenues used to fund governmental expenditures in California. Article XIIIB was changed with the passage of Proposition 111 on the June 1990 ballot. These changes permit greater flexibility with regard to annually calculating increases in the appropriations limit (Gann Limit) by allowing additional growth factors to be used. The factors permitting the maximum allowable increase in the appropriations limit are chosen for the calculation each fiscal year.

As can be seen below, the City is substantially under its appropriations limit. The difference between the appropriations limit and the appropriations subject to limitation has grown over time as the limit has been substantially increased by the annual adjustment factors. This, combines with the comparatively slower pace of growth in proceeds of taxes over the same time period, has contributed to the amount under the appropriations limit.

Fiscal Year 2021-22 Limit $ 8,207,143
2022 Change in Town of Los Altos Hills Population 99.80% FY 2022-23 Change in California Per Capita Personal Income 7.60% FY 2022-23 Limit $ 8,812,095
FY 2022-23 Budget Amount Subject to Limitation $ 5,818,101

Staff Report to City Council Page 5
Proposed FY 2022-23 Budget
June 16, 2022
Amount Under Appropriation Limit $ 2,993,994
2022 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

The report is for financial transparency and is part of the City Council’s strategic priorities for 2022. The goal is targeted to be complete by second quarter 2022.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The Disbursement report does not qualify as a “Project” as defined in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City Council reviewed the FY 2022-23 City Manager Proposed Operating and Capital Budget at the joint budget study session with the Finance and Investment Committee on May 26, 2022. In adopting the FY 2022-23 proposed budget, adding $26,000 in the General Fund, adding $81,896 to Capital Improvement Plan, and reducing the sewer capital expenditures by $66,650, the proposed resolution appropriates total revenues and transfers in $25,538,626, total expenditures and transfers out of $27,817,738, also utilizing $2,311,976 of fund balance. The detail for each fund is itemized in Attachment 1 to the Resolution.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution to Adopt the FY 2022-23 Appropriation Limit (Gann Limit)

2. FY 2022-23 City Manager’s Proposed Operating and FY 2023-27 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
a. Town-Wide Summary
b. Financial Summaries
c. Department Budget
d. Capital Improvement Plan Funding Sources and Summary

3. Resolution to Adopt the FY 2022-23 Salary Schedule

RESOLUTION xx-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF LOS ALTOS HILLS ADOPTING THE FY 2022-23

APPROPRIATION LIMIT AND
THE FY 2022-23 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills has received and completed its review of the proposed FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills now desires to adopt the Appropriations Limit and budget for FY 2022-23.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby resolve as follows:

I. The Gann Appropriations Limit as shown in Attachment 1 is hereby approved; and II. The Operating and Capital Budget as shown in the Attachment 1 budget document is hereby approved; and
A. The amount of the FY 2022-23 budget for each account area of the budget may be drawn upon in the form of warrants issued for payment of demands and certified in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 37208 and 37209.

B. The budget is adopted and shall be controlled at the Fund level by department for the operating budget and by the project level for capital improvement projects.

C. The City Manager is hereby authorized to move budgeted dollars between departments (for the operating budget) and between projects (for the capital improvement budget) during the fiscal year if those transfers are from the same funding source and the overall cumulative appropriation is not increased.

D. The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to carry forward unspent appropriations to the FY 2022-23 if such funds are necessary to complete budgeted projects.

E. The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to make corrections to the budget as reflected in the attached budget document that are errors or inconsistencies without increasing overall appropriations within the same funding source.

F. The City Manager is hereby authorized to solicit bids on the open market for projects budgeted herein.

G. The Administrative Services Director shall periodically report to the City Council the amount and classification of revenues received and expenditures made.

H. A copy of the adopted budget, signed by the Mayor and attended to by the City Clerk, shall be kept on file with the City Clerk of the Town of Los Altos Hills, as the official budget of the Town of Los Altos Hills for the FY 2022-23; Attachment 1

2 The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of June 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
George Tyson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Deborah Padovan, City Clerk

FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Calculation of Appropriations Limits
The Town is required by the State Constitution, Article XIIIB (Proposition 4,) to annually calculate the maximum amount of appropriations subject to limitation. The calculation is intended to limit the annual growth in tax revenues used to fund governmental expenditures in California. Article XIIIB was changed with the passage of Proposition 111 on the June 1990 ballot. These changes permit greater flexibility with regard to annually calculating increases in the appropriations limit (Gann Limit) by allowing additional growth factors to be used. The factors permitting the maximum allowable increase in the appropriations limit are chosen for the calculation each fiscal year.

As can be seen below, the Town is substantially under its appropriations limit. The difference between the appropriations limit and the appropriations subject to limitation has grown over time as the limit has been substantially increased by the annual adjustment factors. This, combines with the comparatively slower pace of growth in proceeds of taxes over the same time period, has contributed to the amount under the appropriations limit.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Limit $ 8,207,143
2022 Change in Town of Los Altos Hills Population 0.9980 2022-23 Change in California Per Capita Personal Income 1.0760 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Limit $ 8,812,095
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget Amount Subject to Limitation 5,818,101 Amount Under Appropriation Limit $ 2,993,994
Attachment 2

TOWN-WIDE FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Proposed
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Proposed
Budget
REVENUE BY TYPE GF SRF CIP Sewer
Property Tax $ 7,744,298 $ 7,744,298
Taxes Other Than Property 720,000 720,000
Franchise Fees 349,000 349,000
Licenses And Permits 2,403,300 2,403,300
Use Of Money And Property 150,000 60,000 210,000
Intergovernmental 24,000 1,107,480 562,119 1,693,599
Charges For Services 934,800 421,000 3,412,823 4,768,623 Miscellaneous 35,000 35,000
Allocations In 4,664,806 4,664,806
TOTAL REVENUE 17,025,204 1,107,480 1,043,119 3,412,823 22,588,626

EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION
General Administration (4,392,220) (4,392,220)
Public Safety (2,368,301) (377,000) (2,745,301)
Planning & Building (3,845,254) (3,845,254)
Parks & Recreation (1,519,378) (1,519,378)
Public Works (3,073,194) (2,896,439) (5,969,634)
Capital Outlay - Sewer (1,170,350) (1,170,350)
Capital Outlay - Governmental (1,216,650) (4,041,816) (5,258,466) TOTAL EXPENDITURES (15,198,347) (1,593,650) (4,041,816) (4,066,789) (24,900,602) Operating Surplus / (DEFICIT) 1,826,858 (486,170) (2,998,697) (653,966) (2,311,976)

TRANSFERS IN / (OUT)
TRANSFERS IN 100,000 2,320,000 2,420,000
TRANSFERS OUT (2,320,000) (100,000) (2,420,000)
TOTAL TRANSFERS (2,220,000) (100,000) 2,320,000 - -
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (393,142) (586,170) (678,697) (653,966) (2,311,976) FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING 17,452,380 1,533,753 2,833,255 4,180,262 25,999,650 FUND BALANCE, ENDING $ 17,059,238 $ 947,583 $ 2,154,558 $ 3,526,296 $ 23,687,673 General Fund Total
Special
Revenue
General
Capital Sewer Fund
Attachment 2.a

(A) (B) (B)/(A)-1 (C) (C)/(A)-1
011
Financial Summary
2019-20
Actual
2020-21
Actual 2021-22 Budget
2021-22
Est. Actual
Budget vs
Est. Actual
2022-23
Proposed
Budget
Percent
Change
Revenue by Category
Property Tax $ 6,834,083 $ 7,315,637 $ 7,241,751 $ 7,610,152 5% $ 7,744,298 7% Taxes Other Than Property 537,836 978,527 459,101 708,198 54% 720,000 57% Franchise Fees 340,268 350,952 379,107 348,451 -8% 349,000 -8% Licenses And Permits 990,768 1,830,032 1,285,264 2,767,300 115% 2,403,300 87% Use Of Money And Property 787,577 204,545 228,997 (293,890) -228% 150,000 -34% Intergovernmental 62,532 208,460 886,623 27,306 -97% 24,000 -97% Charges For Services 1,683,695 1,190,760 914,100 1,138,203 25% 934,800 2% Miscellaneous 119,002 748,867 10,000 56,895 469% 35,000 250% Allocations In 1,858,142 1,898,349 3,514,071 2,782,820 -21% 4,664,806 33% Total Revenue $ 13,213,903 $ 14,726,129 $ 14,919,014 $ 15,145,435 1.5% $ 17,025,204 14% Expenditures by Category
Personnel (3,475,275) (4,726,037) (4,374,627) (3,882,439) -11% (4,677,321) 7% Contractual Services (2,651,565) (2,895,998) (3,949,481) (3,812,459) -3% (4,348,784) 10% Professional Services (377,752) (441,945) (529,700) (412,266) -22% (507,800) -4% Operations (599,754) (748,355) (1,439,037) (1,463,082) 2% (1,703,588) 18% Allocations Out (2,219,517) (2,518,866) (3,283,771) (3,053,280) -7% (3,960,854) 21% Total Expenditures $ (9,323,863) $ (11,331,201) $ (13,576,617) $ (12,623,526) -7% $ (15,198,347) 12% Operating Surplus / (Deficit) $ 3,890,040 $ 3,394,928 $ 1,342,397 $ 2,521,909 88% $ 1,826,858 36% Transfers In / (Out)
Transfers Out (597,361) (2,602,806) (4,000,000) (851,610) -79% (2,220,000) 0% Total Transfers (597,361) (2,602,806) (4,000,000) (851,610) -79% (2,220,000) 0% Change in Fund Balance 3,292,679 792,122 (2,657,603) 1,670,299 (393,142) Fund Balance
Beginning 12,875,678 16,168,357 16,960,479 15,782,081 -7% 17,452,380 5% Ending $ 16,168,357 $ 16,960,479 14,302,876 17,452,380 22% 17,059,238 -17%

GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY
Attachment 2.b

SEWER FUND
(A) (B) (C) (C)/(A)-1
2022-23
Sewer 2019-20 2020-21 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 Proposed Percent Financial Summary Actual Budget Actual Budget Est. Actual Budget Change Revenue by Category
Sewer Assessment Charges $ 3,104,059 $ 3,123,204 $ 3,035,410 $ 3,089,900 $ 3,117,375 $ 3,263,823 6% Sewer Connection Fees 85,595 67,575 88,908 92,615 162,083 149,000 61% Use Of Money And Property 170,506 27,578 10,079 0 0 0 0% Total Revenues 3,360,161 3,218,358 3,134,397 3,182,515 3,279,458 3,412,823 7% Expenditures by Category
Personnel (210,043) (194,168) (115,613) (238,002) (180,000) (276,599) 16% Sewer Treatment Cost (1,882,075) (1,306,540) (1,568,381) (1,505,197) (1,595,130) (1,718,053) 14% Sewer Maintenance Contract (289,428) (501,275) (487,523) (550,000) (513,521) (560,000) 2% Contractual Services (12,972) (8,857) (26,052) (20,500) (1,377) (10,500) -49% Professional Services (106,809) (10,500) (141,892) (20,000) (83,818) (25,000) 25% Operations (13,318) (26,500) (10,986) (18,850) (11,287) (18,000) -5% Allocations Out (277,112) (176,925) (173,666) (223,379) (221,072) (288,287) 29% Total Expenditures (2,791,757) (2,224,765) (2,524,113) (2,575,928) (2,606,205) (2,896,439) 12% Net Operations 568,404 993,593 610,284 606,587 673,253 516,384 -14.9% Other Adjustments
Capital Outlay (315,150) (700,000) (312,900) (500,000) (323,649) (1,170,350) 134.1% Transfer In 294,316
Net Change to Cash Reserves 253,254 293,593 591,700 106,587 349,604 (653,966) -713.6% Unrestricted Net Position
Beginning 3,205,406 3,291,370 3,291,370 3,830,656 3,830,656 4,180,260 9.1% Ending $ 3,458,660 $ 3,584,963 $ 3,883,070 $ 3,937,243 $ 4,180,260 $ 3,526,293 -10.4%

GeneralAdministration
CITY COUNCIL (011-1100)
MISSION:

The mission of the Town of Los Altos Hills is to provide high quality public services and facilities in a fiscally sustainable, responsive, and friendly manner and to foster a safe and healthy community in a semi-rural residential setting.

ORGANIZATION & DESCRIPTION:

The Council is composed of five members who are elected at-large on a non-partisan basis for 4-year staggered terms.

The Mayor is appointed annually from among the elected Council members. The City Council is the governing board of the Town. It provides community leadership, enacts laws, adopts resolutions, ordinances and establishes policies for the Town government. The City Council also adopts an annual budget.

The Council meets the third Thursday of each month in formal, public session and occasionally in additional special meetings and study sessions. All City Council meetings are open to the public and are streamed live on the Town’s website at http://www.losaltoshills.ca.gov. City Council agendas, reports, packets, minutes and video archives of the meetings are posted on the Town’s website. The Mayor and City Council represent the Town on various local, regional, and State policy committees and commissions. The Council also reviews adopted State of California legislation and provides formal input into the legislative process.

PROGRAM SUMMARY & MAJOR SERVICES:
• Legislation
• Policy
• Budget
DEPARTMENT STAFFING:

The Town has five City Council members.

DEPARTMENT GOALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

Town Goal 2021-22 Accomplishments 2022-23 Goals Preservation of Current Quality of Life • Adopted Urgency Ordinance for objective standards
for qualified Senate Bill 9 subdivisions and
Development project
• Formed the Technology Committee to assist Town
operations keeping up-to-date
• Held the first hybrid public meetings to allow
residents maximum flexibility to engage with their
government
• Conduct a series of town employee surveys and
establish a positive culture
• Advocate for continued local control of zoning/housing requirements
• Focus on Council Priorities set at the January 25, 2022 workshop
• Encourage new residents to fill all vacancies the Town’s Standing Committees
• Hold community workshops for Housing & Safety
Elements of the General Plan
• Obtain legal opinion on ballot initiative for Greensheets • Support the review and analysis of a Legacy Giving Fund Emergency
Preparedness and public safety
• Held monthly “Coffee with the Sheriff” event series
for residents to engage with law enforcement
operations
• Formed an Ad-Hoc Committee to begin discussing the
expiring Sheriff’s contract
• Implemented an Automatic License Plate Reader
system in Town
• Fire Task force was formed, and hosted the first
Wildfire Fair at Town Hall
• Respond to crime trends in Town and promote an
ongoing conversation between residents and law
enforcement
• Continue to make progress towards undergrounding
utilities in Town
• Analyze contract options for the expiring County
Sheriff’s contract
• Leverage a newly formed Emergency Preparedness
committee to improve disaster prep and cross
departmental and agency collaboration
Attachment 2.c

CITY COUNCIL (011-1100) (CONT)
BUDGET SUMMARY:

The City Council’s estimated actual for FY2021-22 falls roughly $45,000 short of the adopted FY21-22 budget due to many events still being impacted from the COVID-19 Pandemic. The budget had anticipated in person events, including trainings, council meetings, and the volunteer dinner (estimated at $30,0000), which were all postponed another year.

The City Council’s overall projected expenses for FY2022-23 increased roughly $8,300 from the FY2021-22 adopted budget. The only decrease takes place in the personnel services, due to fewer Councilmembers needing health insurance coverage in comparison to previous budget cycles.

The budget increase includes additional funds for advertisement and publishing expenses due to the community’s desire for Town-wide mailers and public outreach efforts, the possibility of using miscellaneous consultant more to complete the Councils adopted priorities for the year, and City memberships dues increasing as well.

Town Goal 2021-22 Accomplishments 2022-23 Goals Promote Sense of Community • Successfully established eight new Neighborhood
Watch Groups in Town and encouraged more
residents to join
• Distributed over 100 presents to Town volunteers in
lieu of a formal sit-down volunteer dinner.
• Solicited community input in the selection of the new City Manager and two department directors
• Establish Legacy Giving Committee to collect tax
deductible donations for the betterment of the town
• Host the 2023 Volunteer Dinner and other Town
events where allowed under health protocol
• Hold a committee roundtable so that volunteer
groups in Town can talk with one another about their
ongoing project
• Implement Committee guidelines to help improve
and enhance the work of our committees in
collaboration with the council and staff.

Transparency
• Approved 2021-22 Operating and Capital
Improvement Plan
• Conducted a new and improved Council priority
setting session
• Re-design/deploy the City Manager’s Weekly report
• Began producing City Council recaps after each
monthly meeting
• Picked a survey company to conduct Town-wide
community surveys and engagement events.
• Created a plan to engage Town residents regarding
the Town Hall addition project
• Complete a Comp study of Town Employees
• Engage with vendors to improve website and to
reduce friction in getting town information
• Approve the 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget
and Capital Improvement Plan
• Utilize results of community surveys and engagement
events regarding indoor/outdoor community space,
town hall expansion, recreational programs and
other Town concerns
• Gather community input on the 10-year facility needs
assessment.
• Improve communication and transparency between
staff, council, and community.

Risk Mitigation
• Approved the 2021/22 Pavement Rehabilitation
Project to ensure safety in using Town roads and
improve CPI
• Approved 2021 Sanitary Sewer Repair and
Replacement project to mitigate risk of sanitary
sewer overflow
• Adopted a Climate Action Plan for Town operations
• Establish Disaster Preparedness Committee
• Run drills to prepare for disaster preparedness
• Approve 2022/23 Pavement Rehabilitation Project
• Approve the 2022/23 Sewer Rehabilitation Project
• Begin sewer improvements aimed at reducing risk of
sewer line backups.
• Complete Safety Element and Hazard Mitigation Plan
• Form a Disaster Preparedness and Response
Committee

CITY COUNCIL (011-1100) (CONT)

CITY MANAGER (011-1200)
MISSION:

Provide overall management of the Town pursuant to Title 2, Chapter 3, Article 2 of the Municipal Code, execute Council policy, and ensure that residents of Los Altos Hills receive excellent customer service and fair value for their tax dollars.

ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION:

The City Manager Office consists of one budget unit. City Manager provides an oversight of all Town Departments and manages contracts for Law Enforcement services with the County of Santa Clara Sheriff’s Office and Animal Services with the City of Palo Alto. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and directives of the City Council and for the overall management of the Town operations. The City Manager is responsible for preparing and submitting the adopted annual Budget and salary plan to the Council. The City Manager hires and supervises the Executive Leadership Team that includes the Department Heads of each Town department.

PROGRAM SUMMARY & MAJOR SERVICES:
• Direct and organize Town services and departments
• Supervise all public property and assets under jurisdiction of the Council • Recommend the adoption of policies and ordinances as necessary • Purchase materials and supplies necessary for the conduct of the public’s business • Enforce contracts, agreements and permits authorized by the Council • Oversee public information, customer service and community engagement DEPARTMENT STAFFING:

Position FTE City Manager Planning Building Engineering City Manager 1.00 100% 0% 0% 0%
Management Analyst 1.00 55% 15% 15% 15%
Total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) 2.00 1.55 0.15 0.15 0.15 Precent Distribution 100% 78% 8% 8% 8%
DEPARTMENT GOALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

Town Goal 2021-22 Accomplishment 2022-23 Goals Preservation of Current Quality of Life • Worked with the City of Palo Alto and the County of
Santa Clara on parking/traffic issues in relation to the opening of Foothills Park
• Represented the Town’s interests at Santa Clara
County Board Meetings and LAFCO meetings
• Maintained Town services throughout the pandemic
• Adopted a second amendment to the Town’s
Franchise Agreement with GreenWaste which
reduced the annual rate increases in specific years
• Installed new EV chargers at Purissima Park for public use
• Install additional public charging stations for electrical vehicles at Town Hall
• Simplify city permitting process and reduce permit
fees for electrical conversions
• Adopt employee enhancements based on comp
studies
• Continue to improve workplace culture and sense of
belonging among staff.
• Continue to promote wellness among staff
• Seek opportunities to bring the Town together and
promote community and pride of place

Emergency
Preparedness and public safety
• Continued to host Town-sponsored evacuation drills
in specific neighborhood in Town
• Entered into a contract with an energy consultant
for the installation of a battery back-up system at
Town Hall
• Hosted Monthly COVID testing events at Town Hall.
• Conducted EOC training for staff
• Ensure all current staff complete their required
web based NIMS Training
• Onboard new Emergency Preparedness Manager
• Conduct an emergency prep drill with Town staff,
partnering agencies, and relevant committee
members
• Actively monitor the Automatic License Plate Reader
(ALPR) Cameras in Town and conduct one year review
• Complete installation of the battery back-up energy
storage system (BESS) at Town Hall
• Research plans to update the EOC/Heritage House
• Have all employees complete their all of their
suggested NIMS training (online and in person)
Promote Sense of
Community
• Sent Town-wide mailers to residents throughout the
year on a variety of topics
• Finished Phase I of the Town Hall Addition Project
• Created a plan to engage residents on Phase II
• Started a new monthly Talk-and-Walk meeting with
the City Manager to engage with residents
• Continue to focus on joint programing and events
with the City of Los Altos, Chamber of Commerce,
Fire and Sheriff’s office, and GreenWaste
• Coordinate resident input with Council discussion on
the Town Hall facility needs and GreenWaste contract
amendments
Transparency
• Revised and updated the City Manager Weekly
Report sent out via email
• Updated the website as it related to historical
documents like the Greensheets
• Responded to all public record requests in
compliance with State timelines
• Update the Town’s website and increase ease of use
for the public
• Adopt an IT Masterplan
• Adopt an signature policy
• Implement community-wide survey and engagement
efforts
Risk Mitigation
• Completed active shooter training for Town Hall
staff
• Continuously monitored legislation that could affect
the Town – such as SB9
• Purchased 20A credits for the Town’s “Ice Breaker”
undergrounding project
• Provide employees ample opportunity to take all
relevant safety training
• Review Sherriff’s contract and consider additional
sheriff’s deputy during peak periods.

BUDGET SUMMARY:

The City Manager’s budget is heavily influenced by the personnel costs of the Town’s staff and employees. Salaries, health care premiums, dental premiums, vision premiums, and retirement planning fall into this category. The City Manager’s estimated actual for FY2021-22 is significantly lower than the adopted FY2021-22 budget due to meritorious performance raises being initially budgeted as a placeholder in the City Manager’s Office; however, once the merit increases have been distributed, the personnel expenses are allocated to the respective department’s budget. In FY 2022-23, $220,000 has been set as a placeholder for meritorious performance raises for staff.

The largest increase in the City Manager’s FY2022-23 budget takes place in contractual services and reflects the various consultants that staff will engage with throughout the year to meet the adopted 2022 City Council priorities. Many of the priorities the Town will require a specific skillset that current staff does not have, and a consultant will be needed such as website designers, disaster recovery specialists, and workshop facilitators. A placeholder of $25,000 has been budgeted for each potential consultant.

The 2022-23 budget cycle also plans for the return of the Town’s summer internship program, which includes hourly pay and the cost of setting up multiple workstations in Town Hall. Travel and meeting expenses have increased as well with the expectation of in-person event to return. Additional funds have been budgeted for staff instruction, coaching, and training to allow for career enhancement opportunities.

CITY MANAGER (011-1200) (CONT)

CITY ATTORNEY (011-1500)
MISSION:

The mission of the City Attorney is to provide the residents of the Town, City Council and staff with high quality, legal advice and counsel.

ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION:

The Department is comprised of the City Attorney under contract of the law firm of Meyers|Nave and includes all office costs including paralegal, secretarial, clerical, etc. The City Attorney reports directly to the City Council and is charged with the task of serving as the legal counsel to the City Council, Planning Commission, City Manager and staff on all legal aspects of municipal operations.

PROGRAM SUMMARY & MAJOR SERVICES:

Legal services include legal advice and analysis, preparation of legislation including ordinances and resolutions, drafting or review of contracts and agreements, conducting research and supporting the Town in litigation, civil and criminal actions, and code enforcement. The City Attorney attends all regular and special City Council meetings. Other services include meetings with the City Manager and other city officials on an on-call basis and keeping the City Council, City Manager and staff advised of current laws affecting decisions and programs of the Town.

DEPARTMENT STAFFING:

Since the Town contracts for City Attorney services with Meyers|Nave, there is no in-house staffing for City Attorney’s budget.

DEPARTMENT GOALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

Town Goal 2021-22 Accomplishment 2022-23 Goals Risk Mitigation • Attended City Council meetings and Planning
Commission meetings to ensure Brown Act
Compliance and address other legal matters
• Provided legal advice to the City Council, City
Manager, and Town Staff
• Defended the Town in several specific legal matters
• Continue to provide competent legal advice
• Continue to monitor legal developments that affect
the Town and report to staff and City Council
BUDGET SUMMARY:

The City Attorney’s estimated actual for FY2021-22 is significantly less than the adopted FY2021-22 budget due to the anticipated costs for the special projects not costings as much as expected. Additionally, various settlements were made throughout the year to reduce what was budgeted.

The FY2022-23 budget increased by $30,000 compared to 2021-22 adopted budget in-part due to the City Attorney’s retainer increasing for the first time since 2018 as well as staff’s prediction that level of legal representation and advice needed from the Town continue at the current level.

As one of the General Administration departments, all non-billable City Attorney operations are fully distributed to service departments based on City Council approved Cost Allocation Plan.