Agenda packet — Los Gatos City Council, February 4, 2025 (part 1 of 9)

Page 1 of 4 ends

IMPORTANT NOTICE
This is a hybrid meeting and will be held in-person at the Town Council Chambers at 110 E. Main Street and virtually through Zoom Webinar (log-in information provided below). Members of the public may provide public comments for agenda items in
-person or virtually through the Zoom Webinar by following the instructions listed below. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online at www.LosGatosCA.gov/TownYouTube.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE
The public is welcome to provide oral comments in real-time during the meeting in three ways:
 Zoom Webinar (Online): Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device. Please use this URL to join: https://losgatoscagov.zoom.us/j/85481444677?pwd=561kip53XZTmhrTCwGDoNCvDTWQnwJ.1 Passcode: 535103. You can also type in 854 8144 4677 in the “Join a Meeting” page on the Zoom website at www.zoom.us and use passcode 535103.
o When the Mayor announces the item for which you wish to speak, click the “raise hand” feature in Zoom. If you are participating by phone on the Zoom app, press *9 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand.
 Telephone: Please dial (877) 336-1839 for US Toll-free or (636) 651-0008 for US Toll. (Conference code: 1052180)
o If you are participating by calling in, press #2 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand.
 In-Person: Please complete a “speaker’s card” located on the back of the chamber benches and return it to the Town Clerk before the meeting or when the Mayor announces the item for which you wish to speak.

NOTES: (1) Comments will be limited to three (3) minutes or less at the Mayor’s discretion. (2) If you are unable to participate in real-time, you may email [email protected] the subject line “Public Comment Item #__ ” (insert the item number relevant to your comment). (3) Deadlines to submit written comments are:
11:00 a.m. the Thursday before the Council meeting for inclusion in the agenda packet. 11:00 a.m. the Monday before the Council meeting for inclusion in an addendum. 11:00 a.m. on the day of the Council meeting for inclusion in a desk item. (4) Persons wishing to make an audio/visual presentation may do so only on agenda items and must submit the presentation electronically to [email protected] no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting.

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
FEBRUARY 04, 2025
110 EAST MAIN STREET AND TELECONFERENCE

TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 PM
Matthew Hudes, Mayor
Rob Moore, Vice Mayor
Mary Badame, Council Member
Rob Rennie, Council Member
Maria Ristow, Council Member

Page 1 ends

Page 2 of 4 ends

CALL MEETING TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
APPROVE REMOTE PARTICIPATION (This item is listed on the agenda in the event there is an emergency circumstance requiring a Council Member to participate remotely under AB 2449 (Government Code 54953)).

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CONSENT ITEMS (Consent Items are considered routine Town business and may be approved by one motion. Any member of the Council may remove an item from the Consent Items for comment and action. Members of the public may provide input on any or multiple Consent Item(s) when the Mayor asks for public comments on the Consent Items. If you wish to comment, please follow the Participation Instructions contained on Page 1 of this agenda. If an item is removed, the Mayor has the sole discretion to determine when the item will be heard.)

1. Approve the Minutes of the January 21, 2025 Closed Session Town Council Meeting.

2. Approve the Minutes of the January 21, 2025 Town Council Meeting.

3. Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code Regarding Considerations for an Architecture and Site Application, Findings for a Conditional Use Permit, Manufactured Housing, and Private Open Space and Community Recreation Space Requirements Pursuant to Implementation Program AQ of the 2023- 2031 Housing Element. Adoption of this Ordinance is Exempt Pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in That It Can be Seen With Certainty That It Will Not Impact the Environment. Town Code Amendment Application A-24-008. Project Location: Town Wide. Applicant: Town of Los Gatos.

Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Amending Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” of the Town Code to Amend Considerations for an Architecture and Site Application, Findings for a Conditional Use Permit, Manufactured Housing, and Private Open Space and Community Recreation Space Requirements.

4. Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code Regarding Parking Standards Pursuant to Implementation Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element. Adoption of this Ordinance is Exempt Pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in That It Can be Seen With Certainty That It Will Not Impact the Environment. Town Code Amendment Application A-24-009. Project Location: Town Wide. Applicant: Town of Los Gatos.

Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Amending Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” of the Town Code Regarding Parking Standards, Pursuant to Implementation Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

5. Adopt an Ordinance Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses for Lots Within the Planned Development Overlay Zone, Allowing Subdivision of One Lot into Two Lots, Construction of a Single-Family Residence, and Site Work Requiring a Grading Permit on Property Zoned O:PD. Located at 120 Oak Meadow Drive. APN 529-10-131.

Subdivision Application M-20-011, Planned Development Application PD-20-002, Architecture and Site Application S-22-021. Categorically Exempt Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15315: Minor Land Divisions; 15303: New Construction; and 15304:

Minor Alterations to Land. Property Owners: Marty and Penny McFarland. Applicant:

Page 2 ends

Page 3 of 4 ends

Terence J. Szewczyk (M-20-011 and PD-20-002). Applicant: Jay Plett, Architect (S-22-021).

Project Planner: Sean Mullin.

Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Repealing and Replacing Planned Development Ordinance 1412 Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses For Lots Within The Planned Development Overlay Zone.

6. Authorize the Town Manager to Execute the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with DKS Associates to Extend the Term of the Agreement to September 30, 2025.

7. Authorize the Town Manager to Execute an Agreement not to exceed $189,646 with Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. for Consulting Services to Update and Provide Additional Objective Design Standards for Qualifying Multi-Family and Mixed-Use Residential Developments.

8. Approve the 2025 Work Plans Recommended by the Town’s Library Board, Arts and Culture Commission, Complete Streets and Transportation Commission, and Finance Commission.

VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS (Members of the public are welcome to address the Town Council on any matter that is not listed on the agenda and is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Town Council. The law generally prohibits the Town Council from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff accordingly. To ensure all agenda items are heard, this portion of the agenda is limited to 30 minutes. In the event additional speakers were not heard during the initial Verbal Communications portion of the agenda, an additional Verbal Communications will be opened prior to adjournment. Each speaker is limited to no more than three (3) minutes or such time as authorized by the Mayor.) PUBLIC HEARINGS (Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of five minutes for opening statements. Members of the public may be allotted up to three minutes to comment on any public hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of three minutes for closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are subject to Council’s consent at the meeting.)

9. Consider a Recommendation by the Planning Commission to Approve a Planned Development for Construction of a Senior Living Community, Removal of Large Protected Trees, and Site Improvements Requiring a Grading Permit on Property Zoned R:PD; Adopt a Resolution Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and Introduce an Ordinance Repealing Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses for Lots Within the Planned Development Overlay Zone. Located at 110 Wood Road. APN 510-47-038. An Environmental Impact Report has been Prepared for the Project. Planned Development Application PD-20-001 and Environmental Impact Report EIR-21-002. Applicant:

Rockwood Pacific. Property Owner: Front Porch Communities. Project Planner: Sean Mullin.

Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Repealing and Replacing Planned Development Ordinance 938 Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses for Lots Within The Planned Development Overlay Zone.

COUNCIL / MANAGER MATTERS

Page 3 ends

Page 4 of 4 ends

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
ADJOURNMENT (Council policy is to adjourn no later than midnight unless a majority of Council votes for an extension of time.)
ADA NOTICE In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Clerk’s Office at (408) 354-6834.

Notification at least two (2) business days prior to the meeting date will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR §35.102-35.104].

NOTICE REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Town Council after initial distribution of the agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Clerk’s Office at Town Hall, 110 E. Main Street, Los Gatos and on Town’s website at www.losgatosca.gov. Town Council agendas and related materials can be viewed online at https://losgatos-ca.municodemeetings.com/.

Page 4 ends

110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6832
www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 1
DRAFT
Minutes of the Town Council Special Meeting – Closed Session Tuesday, January 21, 2025
4:45 P.M.

The Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a special meeting in person to hold a Closed Session.

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 4:45 P.M.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Matthew Hudes, Vice Mayor Rob Moore, Council Member Mary Badame, Council Member Rob Rennie, and Council Member Maria Ristow.

Absent: None.

VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS (ONLY ON ITEMS ON THE AGENDA)
Lee Fagot
- Commented on the existing litigation case.

THE TOWN MOVED TO CLOSED SESSION ON THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code §54957.6) To meet with Town Negotiators listed below in closed session pursuant to Government Code §54957.6 regarding negotiations with the Employee Organizations listed below:

Town Negotiators:

Lisa Charbonneau, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
Cheryl Parkman, Human Resources Director
Employee Organizations:

Police Officers’ Association (POA)
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Town Employees Association (TEA)
Unrepresented Employees (All Confidential, Management, Temporary/Hourly Positions)

2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Government Code §54956.8) Property: 208 E. Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030
Agency Negotiator: Katy Nomura, Assistant Town Manager
Negotiating Parties: Town of Los Gatos and Los Gatos-Saratoga Recreation To Be Negotiated: Terms of lease

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code §54956.9(e)(1))
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(e)(1): 1 case.

4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code §54956.9(e)(1))
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(e)(1): 3 cases.

Page 5 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

PAGE 2 OF 2
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Special Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025

5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL— EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code §54956.9(d)(1))
Lynley Kerr Hogan vs. Rob Moore et al
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case Number: 25CV456254 The Town Council reconvened in open session. There was no reportable action.

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:29 p.m.

Attest: Submitted by:
___________________________ ___________________________ Jenna De Long, Deputy Town Clerk Chris Constantin, Town Manager

Page 6 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6832
www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 2
DRAFT
Minutes of the Town Council Meeting
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
7:00 P.M.

The Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a regular meeting in person and via teleconference.

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Matthew Hudes, Vice Mayor Rob Moore, Council Member Mary Badame, Council Member Rob Rennie, Council Member Maria Ristow.

Absent: None.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Girl Scouts Diya, Nithyasmera, Sahara, and Sofia led the Pledge of Allegiance. The audience was invited to participate.

PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Hudes presented commendations to outgoing Commissioners.

CONSENT ITEMS (TO BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE MOTION)

1. Approve the Minutes of the December 10, 2024 Special Town Council Meeting.

2. Approve the Minutes of the December 16, 2024 Special Town Council Meeting.

3. Approve the Minutes of the December 17, 2024 Closed Session Town Council Meeting.

4. Approve the Minutes of the December 17, 2024 Town Council Meeting.

5. Receive the Monthly Financial and Investment Report for November 2024.

6. Adopt a Resolution Granting an Appeal of a Planning Commission Decision to Approve an Architecture and Site Application for Construction of a Single-Family Residence and Site Improvements Requiring a Grading Permit on Vacant Property Zoned R-1:8 and Remanding the Decision to the Planning Commission with Specific Direction. Located at 15411 National Avenue. APN 424-12-140. Architecture and Site Application S-23-033. Categorically Exempt Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303: New Construction. Property Owners:

Vyankatesh and Ramya Muddada. Applicant: Jose Rama. Appellant: Hellen Martinez. Project Planner: Erin Walters.

7. Adopt An Ordinance Amending Section 06.20.020 (Buildings and Building Regulations) to Add the Definition of Qualifying Alterations. ORDINANCE 2369 Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Adding a Section 06.20.020, “Qualifying Alterations,” to Article II, “Administration of Codes,” of

Page 7 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 2 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Chapter 6, “Buildings And Building Regulations,” of the Town Code to Add a Definition for “Qualifying Alterations.”

8. Accept Grant Funding From the Town’s Citizens Option for Public Safety/Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (COPS/SLESF) and Authorize Revenue and Expenditure Allocation to the Grant Program “4818” for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

9. Authorize the Town Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to the Agreement for Services with Sequoia Ecological Consulting Inc. to Increase the Contract Amount by $6,440 for an Adjusted Contract Amount Not to Exceed $237,795 for Vegetation Management – Townwide Open Spaces Project (CIP No. 832-4508).

10. Authorize the Town Manager to Execute a Third Amendment to the Agreement for Services with Traffic Management, Inc. to Extend the Contract Term to August 29, 2025.

11. Authorize the Town Manager to Execute a Pass-Through Agreement with CSG, Inc. for Review and Inspection of Encroachment Permit Applications Related to Comcast Infrastructure; and Authorize Revenue and Expenditure Budget Adjustments in the Amount of $200,000 to Recognize the Comcast Deposit Revenue and Associated Expenditure for CSG Review Services.

Council Member Rennie stated he wanted to vote no on item number six. Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney, recommended item six be pulled from the consent calendar so it could be voted on separately.

The Mayor stated item six would be addressed at the end of the meeting.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

No one spoke.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Ristow to approve consent items one through five and seven through eleven. Seconded by Vice Mayor Moore.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS
Gus Who
- Commented on concerns with policies, water rate increases, recent events, and safety.

Heath Rocha, Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District - Commented on the upcoming transition of the board’s election process from at-large to bytrustee.

Catharine Sommers, Centerpiece Flowers
- Commented on concerns with the dumpsters on Village Lane.

Page 8 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 3 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Rich Stevens
- Commented on concerns with zoning changes.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. Weed Abatement Public Hearing to Consider Objections to the Proposed Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation (Weeds) for Properties Listed on the 2025 Weed Abatement Program Commencement Report and Order the Abatement.

Meredith Johnston, Administrative Technician, presented the staff report.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Majid Mohazzab
- Commented on the weed abatement on his properties and requested the Council remove his properties from the program.

Diane Egli
- Commented on the weed abatement on her property and requested the Council remove her property from the program.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Ristow to retain all addresses on the Weed Abatement List and have the County move forward with the next steps, retain these properties for three years with the exception if [15839] Del Cerro changes the landscaping and meets the criteria, that property can be removed knowing there will not be a risk for the next two years; and the property 16220 Hardwood and 104 Almond Blossom remain on [the list] for three years until or unless landscaping is done and there is no risk of weeds growing up. Seconded by Vice Mayor Moore.

VOTE: Motion passed 4-1. Council Member Badame voted no.

13. Conduct a Public Hearing for Appeal of Administrative Citation VL-19-362 (16660 Cypress Way) for Violations of the Los Gatos Town Code Related to Grading and Building and Adopt a Resolution Upholding the Administrative Citation and Imposing Costs According to Proof.

Allen Meyer, Code Enforcement Officer, and Lance Bayer, Special Counsel, presented the staff report and gave a presentation on the reasons for the citation.

Council Member Ristow, Council Member Badame, Vice Mayor Moore, and Mayor Hudes disclosed they each viewed the property.

Page 9 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 4 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Richard Harris, Appellant Counsel, provided opening remarks and commented on concerns.

Council asked clarifying questions.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Scott Watson
- Commented on disputes with the appellant, violation of property rights, and previous litigation.

Ivy Chang
- Commented on concerns with the unpermitted improvements the on the property, the retaining wall, and the length of time for the code violations.

Lance Bayer, Special Counsel, provided a rebuttal and closing comments.

Richard Harris, Appellant Counsel, provided a rebuttal and closing comments.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council asked questions and discussed the item.

Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney, recommended continuing the item to allow the Council to receive and review a letter submitted on behalf of the appellant. She further recommended that at the continued meeting, Council should allow each side to have five minutes to address the letter and allow an opportunity for comments only on the letter.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Badame to continue the item to March 4 due to a procedural technicality. Seconded by Council Member Ristow.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

Mayor Hudes called a recess at 9:40 p.m.

The meeting reconvened at 9:53 p.m.

14. Consider a Recommendation by the Planning Commission to Approve a Modification of Planned Development Ordinance 1412, Subdivision of One Lot into Two Lots, Construction of a Single-Family Residence, and Site Work Requiring a Grading Permit on Property Zoned O:PD; Adopt a Resolution Approving the Subdivision, and Architecture and Site Applications; and Introduce an Ordinance to Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses For Lots Within The Planned Development Overlay Zone. Located at 120 Oak Meadow Drive.

APN 529-10-131. Subdivision Application M-20-011, Planned Development Application PD20-002, Architecture and Site Application S-22-021. Categorically Exempt Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15315: Minor Land Divisions; 15303: New Construction; and 15304:

Page 10 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 5 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Minor Alterations to Land. Property Owners: Marty and Penny McFarland. Applicant:

Terence J. Szewczyk (M-20-011 and PD-20-002). Applicant: Jay Plett, Architect (S-22-021).

Project Planner: Sean Mullin. RESOLUTION 2025-001
Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Repealing and Replacing Planned Development Ordinance 1412 Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses For Lots Within The Planned Development Overlay Zone.

Sean Mullin, Planning Manager, presented the staff report.

All Council Members disclosed they had visited the site.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Jay Plett, Architect/Applicant and Terence J. Szewczyk, Applicant - Commented on the project and requested approval of the item.

Desiree Hedberg, Affirming Relationship Therapy
- Commented on noise concerns and asked questions.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council asked questions and discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Badame to adopt a resolution approving the subdivision, architecture and site applications to allow subdivision from one lot to two lots and construction of a single-family residence; introduce an ordinance repealing and replacing Planned Development Ordinance 1412 establishing development standards and allowable uses for lots within the Planned Development Overlay Zone; and make the finding that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the adopted guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act Section 15315 – Minor Land Divisions as described in Attachment 2. Seconded by Council Member Ristow.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

15. Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code Regarding Considerations for an Architecture and Site Application, Findings for a Conditional Use Permit, Manufactured Housing, and Private Open Space and Community Recreation Space Requirements, Pursuant to Implementation Program AQ of the 2023- 2031 Housing Element. Adoption of this Ordinance is Exempt Pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in That It Can be Seen with Certainty That It Will Not Impact the Environment. Town Code Amendment Application A-24-008. Project Location: Town Wide. Applicant: Town of Los Gatos.

Page 11 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 6 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Ordinance Title: An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Amending Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” of the Town Code to Amend Considerations for an Architecture and Site Application, Findings for a Conditional Use Permit, Manufactured Housing, and Private Open Space and Community Recreation Space Requirements.

Jocelyn Shoopman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Lee Quintana
- Commented on concerns with large private open spaces on multifamily dwellings, CUP findings, and the staff report.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council asked questions and discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Badame to introduce an ordinance in Attachment 5 amending Chapter 29 of the Zoning Regulations of the Town Code regarding considerations for an architecture and site application, findings for a conditional use permit, manufactured housing, and private open space and community recreation space requirements pursuant to Implementation Program AQ of the 2023-2031 Housing Element. Seconded by Vice Mayor Moore.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

16. Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code Regarding Parking Standards Pursuant to Implementation Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element. Adoption of this Ordinance is Exempt Pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in That It Can be Seen with Certainty That It Will Not Impact the Environment.

Town Code Amendment Application A-24-009. Project Location: Town Wide. Applicant:

Town of Los Gatos.

Sean Mullin, Planning Manager, presented the staff report.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

No one spoke.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Page 12 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 7 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Council asked questions and discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Ristow to introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code regarding Parking Standards pursuant to Implementation Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element and find adoption of this ordinance is exempt pursuant to CEQA 15061(b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that it will not impact the environment. Seconded by Vice Mayor Moore.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

OTHER BUSINESS

17. Receive the Information Provided in the Police Services Report: July – December 2024.

Jamie Field, Police Chief, provided a presentation on the Police Services Report.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Diana Schnabel and Len Connolly, Jewish Silicon Valley
- Thanked the Police Department and commended its level of service.

Johnathan Knowles, Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police Foundation - Thanked the Police Department and commended its level of service.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council discussed the item and received the report.

18. Discussion, Consideration, and Approval to Add a Full-Time Emergency Manager (Classification: Division Manager) Position to the FY 2024-25 Budget and Approve an Expenditure Budget Adjustment of $1,000,000 for Emergency Management Efforts from the Available Special/Capital Projects Reserve.

Chris Constantin, Town Manager, introduced Katy Nomura, Assistant Town Manager, and Dennis Lollie, Santa Clara County Deputy Fire Chief, and provided background on the recommended action.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Rob Stump
- Commented on wildfire prevention measures and stated support for approval of this item.

Carin Yamamoto
- Commented in support of an Emergency Manager and stated concerns related to earthquakes.

Page 13 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 8 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Peter Hertan
- Commented on fire insurance costs and spoke about getting a Firewise community certification.

Susan Burnett
- Commented on updating the Hillside Development standards and guidelines.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Badame to extend the time to 12:15 a.m. Seconded by Council Member Ristow.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Ristow to add a full-time Emergency Manager position to Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget and approve an Expenditure Budget Adjustment of $1,000,000 for Emergency Management Efforts from the available Special/Capital Projects Reserve. Seconded by Council Member Badame.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.

19. Resolution Declaring Town-Owned Property at 4 Tait to be Exempt Surplus Land Pursuant to the State Surplus Land Act [Gov. Code Section 54221(f)(1)(B)] and Authorizing Town Manager to Pursue Disposal of the Property and Make Recommendations to the Town Council.

Council Member Ristow recused herself from this item due to the location of her property and left the Council Chambers.

Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney, presented the staff report.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

Lee Quintana
- Commented on zoning concerns and inquired if the site was removed from the historic district.

MOTION: Motion by Vice Mayor Moore to extend the meeting until 12:20 a.m. Seconded by Council Member Badame.

VOTE: Motion passed 4-0-1. Council Member Ristow recused.

Page 14 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 9 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Lee Fagot
- Commented on the property and requested it be preserved as a community resource for non-profit groups.

Carin Yamamoto
- Commented on concerns about selling the property and requested it be preserved.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Badame to adopt a resolution declaring Town-owned property at 4 Tait Avenue to be exempt surplus land pursuant to the State Surplus Land Act Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(B) authorizing the Town Manager to pursue disposal of the property and make recommendations to the Town Council.

Seconded by Council Member Moore.

VOTE: Motion passed 4-0-1. Council Member Ristow recused.

Pulled Consent Items

Vyankatesh and Ramya Muddada. Applicant: Jose Rama. Appellant: Hellen Martinez. Project Planner: Erin Walters.

Council discussed the item.

Mayor Hudes opened public comment.

MOTION: Motion by Vice Mayor Moore to extend the meeting to 12:25 a.m. Seconded by Council Member Rennie.

VOTE: Motion passed 4-0-1. Council Member Ristow recused.

Christian Urricariet
- Stated his inquiry was answered during Council’s discussion.

Page 15 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 10 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025
Hellen
- Inquired if there was a technicality in the resolution or if something changed affected the appeal decision, but believed these questions were answered.

Mayor Hudes closed public comment.

Council discussed the item.

MOTION: Motion by Council Member Badame to adopt a resolution in Attachment 1 granting an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve an Architecture and Site Application for the construction of a single-family residence and site improvements requiring a Grading Permit on vacant property zoned R-1:8 and remanding the decision to the Planning Commission with specific direction. Seconded by Vice Mayor Moore.

VOTE: Motion passed 3-1. Council Member Rennie voted no. Council Member Ristow absent.

COUNCIL/TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
Council Matters
- Council Member Rennie stated he had nothing to report. - Vice Mayor Moore stated he was appointed Chair of the West Valley Sanitation District Authority Board, appointed to the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board of Directors; attended a VTA Board meeting, a Finance Commission meeting; met with residents and community leaders, Melissa Toren from KCAT, the Executive Director of the Youth Sciences Institute Pamela Bentley-Mills, the Chair of the DEI Commission Gordon Yamate, and the developer of the Meadows; attended the San Jose Spotlight Editors’ Coffee, the Home First Homeless Memorial; held his Council Members community coffee and Young Leaders group.
- Council Member Badame stated she met with the development team of the Los Gatos Meadows rebuild, attended a Finance Commission meeting, and met with the Executive Director of KCAT.
- Mayor Hudes stated he met with residents concerning development and older adults.

Town Manager Matters
- Announced Mayor Hudes has reappointed Joe Rodgers to the Finance Commission and Council Member Ristow appointed Adam Fisher to the Finance Commission.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney, stated the Town Council met in closed session to conference with the Towns Labor Negotiators, to Conference with Real Property Negotiators, to discuss two matters of anticipated litigation, and one matter of existing litigation, and there is no reportable action.

Page 16 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PAGE 11 OF 11
SUBJECT: Draft Minutes of the Town Council Meeting of January 21, 2025 DATE: January 21, 2025

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 12:22 a.m.

Respectfully Submitted:
_____________________________________
Jenna De Long, Deputy Town Clerk

Page 17 ends

ITEM NO. 2.

PREPARED BY: Jocelyn Shoopman
Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Community Development Director
110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6872 www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 3
DATE: January 31, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code Regarding Considerations for an Architecture and Site Application, Findings for a Conditional Use Permit, Manufactured Housing, and Private Open Space and Community Recreation Space Requirements Pursuant to Implementation Program AQ of the 2023-2031 Housing Element. Adoption of this Ordinance is Exempt Pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in That It Can be Seen With Certainty That It Will Not Impact the Environment. Town Code Amendment Application A-24-008. Project Location: Town Wide. Applicant:

Town of Los Gatos.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt an ordinance (Attachment 1) amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code regarding considerations for an Architecture and Site application, findings for a Conditional Use Permit, manufactured housing, and private open space and community recreation space requirements, pursuant to Implementation Program AQ of the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of January 21, 2025, the Town Council held a public hearing to consider the introduction of an ordinance to amend Town Code Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” of the Town Code to modify the Architecture and Site findings to make them objective, specifically, Finding (4) relating to the site layout and Finding (6) related to the architectural design of the

Page 18 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

PAGE 2 OF 2
SUBJECT: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 of the Town Code, Implementation Program AQ
DATE: January 31, 2025
building; modify the Conditional Use Permit findings to make them objective, specifically, Finding (1) relating to the desirableness of the project to the public convenience or welfare and Finding (2) related to the integrity and character of the zone; modify the definition of a dwelling, single-family, by adding that the definition also includes manufactured homes pursuant to Section 65852.3 of the Government Code; and modify the private open space and community recreation open space requirements for a multi-family and condominium project to align with the Objective Design Standards. The Town Council voted unanimously to approve the introduction of the ordinance.

This ordinance is returning to the Town Council for final adoption. The ordinance will take effect 30 days after its adoption.

COORDINATION:

This report was coordinated with the offices of the Town Manager and Town Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of this ordinance does not impact the Town’s budget and is required under Program AQ of the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

Adoption of this ordinance is exempt pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that it will not significantly affect the physical environment in that it will make minor changes to the regulations applicable to considerations for an Architecture and Site application, findings for a Conditional Use Permit, manufactured housing, and private open space and community recreation space requirements.

ATTACHMENT:

1. Draft Ordinance

Page 19 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

Page 1 of 5 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date

DRAFT ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING CHAPTER 29, “ZONING REGULATIONS,” OF THE TOWN CODE

REGARDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ARCHITECTURE AND SITE

APPLICATION, FINDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,

MANUFACTURED HOUSING, AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND

COMMUNITY RECREATION SPACE REQUIREMENTS, PURSUANT TO
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM AQ OF THE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT WHEREAS, the 2023-2031 Housing Element, which was adopted on June 4, 2024, and subsequently found in compliance with housing element law on July 10, 2024, by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, provides that the Town will amend Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code regarding considerations for an Architecture and Site application, findings for a Conditional Use Permit, manufactured housing, and private open space and community recreation space requirements; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments to Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code, found that the proposed amendments are consistent with the goals and policies of the Town’s General Plan, and recommended adoption of the proposed amendments by the Town Council; WHEREAS, the amendments are consistent with the General Plan and its Elements; and WHEREAS, the amendments are consistent with Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations” of the Town Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos as follows:

SECTION I. Incorporation of Recitals.

The Town Council finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION II. In Section 29.10.020, “Definitions,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” the definition of “Dwelling, single-family” is amended to read as follows:

Dwelling, single-family means a detached building containing but one (1) kitchen and designed and used to house not more than one (1) family, including domestic employees of such family, and manufactured homes pursuant to Section 65852.3 of the Government Code.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 20 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

Page 2 of 5 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
SECTION III. Section 29.10.065 “Recreational open space for residential condominiums,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(1) Private open space. Each ground floor dwelling unit shall have a minimum of one hundred and twenty (120) square feet of outdoor usable open space in the form of a single enclosed patio or deck located essentially at the level of the main living area. Each dwelling unit above the ground floor shall have sixty (60) square feet of outdoor usable open space in the form of a balcony. Where multiple balconies are provided for a single unit, the 60-square foot minimum can be an aggregate of all balconies, provided each balcony meets the requirements for minimum horizontal dimensions. For purposes of this section, a multiple floor unit with the lower floor on the ground level can choose to either provide 120 square feet of open space in the form of a single enclosed patio or deck or provide 60 square feet of open space in the form of a balcony. The minimum horizontal dimension is six feet in any direction. The minimum vertical clearance required is eight feet. Private recreation space shall be directly accessible from the residential unit. Private open space shall be suitably screened for the privacy of the occupant. Location and screening are subject to review by the deciding body. (2) Community recreation space. The minimum dimensions are 10 feet by 6 feet. A minimum of 60 percent of the community recreation space shall be open to the sky and free of permanent solid-roofed weather protection structures. Community recreation space shall provide shading for a minimum of 15 percent of the community recreation space by either trees or structures, such as awnings, canopies, umbrellas, or a trellis. Tree shading shall be calculated by using the diameter of the tree crown at 15 years maturity.

Shading from other built structures shall be calculated by using the surface area of the overhead feature.
i. Community recreation space shall be provided in Residential Mixed-Use developments at a minimum of 100 square feet per residential unit plus a minimum of two percent of the non-residential square footage.
ii. Community recreation space shall be provided in multi-family residential development projects at a minimum of 100 square feet per residential unit. iii. A project with four or fewer residential units is exempt from community recreation space requirements.

SECTION IV. Subsection (4) of Section 29.20.150 “Considerations in review of applications,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(4) Considerations relating to site layout. The orientation and location of buildings and open spaces in relation to the physical characteristics of the site and the neighborhood; and the appearance of the buildings with adjacent development. Buildings shall strengthen the form of the neighborhood (e.g. downtown, Los Gatos Boulevard, etc.). Buildings should maximize preservation of solar access. In the downtown, mid-block pedestrian arcades linking Santa Cruz Avenue with existing and new parking facilities shall be encouraged, and shall include such crime prevention elements as good sight lines and lighting systems.

Page 21 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

Page 3 of 5 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
SECTION V. Subsection (6) of Section 29.20.150, “Considerations in review of applications,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(6) Considerations relating to the exterior architectural design of buildings and structures.

The effect of the height, width, shape, and exterior construction and design of buildings and structures as such factors relate to the existing and future neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which they are situated, and the purposes of architecture and site approval. Consistency and compatibility shall be encouraged in scale, massing, materials, color, texture, reflectivity, openings, and other details.

SECTION VI. Subsection (a) of Section 29.20.190, “Findings and decision,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(a) The deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a conditional use permit when specifically authorized by the provisions of this chapter if it finds that:
(1) The proposed uses of the property are essential to the public convenience or welfare;
(2) The proposed uses will not impair the existing uses of the zone; (3) The proposed uses would not be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare; and
(4) The proposed uses of the property are in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the general plan and the purposes of this chapter; and (5) A hazardous waste facility proposal is subject to the California Health and Safety Code, Article 8.7, Section 25199—25199.14 and shall be consistent with the Santa Clara County Hazardous Waste Management Plan.

SECTION VII. Section 29.40.660, “Recreational open space for multiple-family dwellings,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(1) Private open space. Each ground floor dwelling unit shall have a minimum of one hundred and twenty (120) square feet of outdoor usable open space in the form of a single enclosed patio or deck located essentially at the level of the main living area.

Each dwelling unit above the ground floor shall have sixty (60) square feet of outdoor usable open space in the form of a balcony. Where multiple balconies are provided for a single unit, the 60-square foot minimum can be an aggregate of all balconies, provided each balcony meets the requirements for minimum horizontal dimensions.

For purposes of this section, a multiple floor unit with the lower floor on the ground level can choose to either provide 120 square feet of open space in the form of a single enclosed patio or deck or provide 60 square feet of open space in the form of a balcony.

The minimum horizontal dimension is six feet in any direction. The minimum vertical clearance required is eight feet. Private recreation space shall be directly accessible from the residential unit. Private open space shall be suitably screened for the privacy of the occupant. Location and screening is subject to review by the deciding body.

Page 22 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

Page 4 of 5 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
(2) Community recreation space. The minimum dimensions are 10 feet by six feet. A minimum of 60 percent of the community recreation space shall be open to the sky and free of permanent solid-roofed weather protection structures. Community recreation space shall provide shading for a minimum of 15 percent of the community recreation space by either trees or structures, such as awnings, canopies, umbrellas, or a trellis.

Tree shading shall be calculated by using the diameter of the tree crown at 15 years maturity. Shading from other built structures shall be calculated by using the surface area of the overhead feature.
i. Community recreation space shall be provided in Residential Mixed-Use developments at a minimum of 100 square feet per residential unit plus a minimum of two percent of the non-residential square footage.
ii. Community recreation space shall be provided in multi-family residential development projects at a minimum of 100 square feet per residential unit. iii. A project with four or fewer residential units is exempt from community recreation space requirements.

SECTION VIII. Severability.

In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction holds any Section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise invalid, the invalid portion shall be severed from this Ordinance and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town hereby declares that it would have adopted each Section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases in this Ordinance might be declared unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise invalid.

SECTION IX. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Considerations.

The Town Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that it will not significantly affect the physical environment in that it will in that it will make minor changes to the regulations applicable to considerations for an Architecture and Site application, findings for a Conditional Use Permit, manufactured housing, and private open space and community recreation space requirements.

SECTION X. Publication.

In accordance with Section 63937 of the Government Code of the State of California, this Ordinance takes effect 30 days from the date of its passage. The Town Council hereby directs the Town Clerk to cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be published or posted in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

Page 23 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

Page 5 of 5 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
SECTION XI. Effective Date.

This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on the 21st day of January 2025, and adopted by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos at its regular meeting on the 4
th day of February 2025, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:
_______________________________

MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
___________________________________

TOWN CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA

Page 24 ends

ITEM NO. 3.

PREPARED BY: Sean Mullin, AICP
Planning Manager
Reviewed by: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Community Development Director
110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6872 www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 4
DATE: January 31, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code Regarding Parking Standards Pursuant to Implementation Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element. Adoption of this Ordinance is Exempt Pursuant to CEQA, Section 15061(b)(3) in That It Can be Seen With Certainty That It Will Not Impact the Environment. Town Code Amendment Application A-24-009. Project Location: Town Wide. Applicant: Town of Los Gatos.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt an ordinance (Attachment 1) amending Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code regarding parking standards, pursuant to Implementation Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of January 21, 2025, the Town Council held a public hearing to consider the introduction of an ordinance to amend Town Code Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” Article I, “In General,” Division 4, “Parking” to revise Section 29.10.150 to reduce parking requirements for multi-family developments located near transit and eliminate guest parking requirements for multi-family developments Town wide, pursuant to Housing Element Implementation Program AA. Additionally, the ordinance reintroduces parking requirements to Section 29.10.150 (b) that were erroneously removed through a previous Town Code amendment and removes language from Section 29.10.150 (c)(6) that is unrelated to parking requirements for hospitals. The Town Council voted unanimously to approve the introduction of the ordinance.

Page 25 ends

ITEM NO. 4.

PAGE 2 OF 2
SUBJECT: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 29 of the Town Code, Implementation Program AA
DATE: January 31, 2025
This ordinance is returning to the Town Council for final adoption. The ordinance will take effect 30 days after its adoption.

COORDINATION:

This report was coordinated with the offices of the Town Manager and Town Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of this ordinance does not impact the Town’s budget and is required under Program AA of the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

ATTACHMENT:

1. Draft Ordinance

Page 26 ends

ITEM NO. 4.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date

DRAFT ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING CHAPTER 29, “ZONING REGULATIONS,” OF THE TOWN CODE

REGARDING PARKING STANDARDS, PURSUANT TO
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM AA OF THE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT WHEREAS, the 2023-2031 Housing Element, which was adopted on June 4, 2024, and subsequently found in compliance with housing element law on July 10, 2024, by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, provides that the Town will amend Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code regarding parking standards; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments to Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations) of the Town Code, found that the proposed amendments are consistent with the goals and policies of the Town’s General Plan, and recommended adoption of the proposed amendments by the Town Council; WHEREAS, the amendments are consistent with the General Plan and its Elements; and WHEREAS, the amendments are consistent with Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations” of the Town Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos as follows:

SECTION I. Incorporation of Recitals.

The Town Council finds that the above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION II. Subsection (b) of Section 29.10.150, “Number of off-street spaces required,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(b) Parking requirements for downtown. The parking requirements for various uses in the downtown are as follows:
(1) Retail and commercial stores, shops, personal service businesses, specialty food retail, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and tap/tasting rooms. One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area.
(2) Business and professional offices, retail banks, financial and investment services, insurance companies, social service agencies, and studios. One (1) parking space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. (3) Theaters. One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area.
(4) For uses not specifically listed in this subsection the requirements shall be as set forth in subsection (c).

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 27 ends

ITEM NO. 4.

Page 2 of 3 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
SECTION III. Subsection (c) of Section 29.10.150, “Outside downtown parking requirements,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(c) Outside downtown parking requirements. The number of off-street parking spaces required for areas outside the downtown is set in this subsection. When a use is not listed in this subsection, the Planning Director shall determine the parking requirements by analogy to the requirements for the listed uses.

SECTION IV. Subsection (c)(3) of Section 29.10.150, “Outside downtown parking requirements,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(3) Multiple-unit dwellings in all zones and two-family dwellings in the R-1D zone. One and onehalf (1½) times the number of living units in such dwellings, except multiple-unit dwellings and mixed-use developments that include a multiple-unit dwelling component that are located within one-half (½) mile walking distance of public transportation shall provide one (1) parking space per dwelling unit. For the purposes of this subsection, public transportation means a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Public Resources Code Section 21155, or a major transit stop, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21064.3.

SECTION V. Subsection (c)(6) of Section 29.10.150, “Outside downtown parking requirements,” of Chapter 29, “Zoning Regulations,” is amended to read as follows:
(6) Hospitals. One and one-half (1½) parking spaces for each bed.

SECTION VI. Severability.

SECTION VII. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Page 28 ends

ITEM NO. 4.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
SECTION VIII. Publication.

SECTION IX. Effective Date.

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:
_______________________________

MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
___________________________________

TOWN CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA

Page 29 ends

ITEM NO. 4.

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 5
DATE: January 31, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt an Ordinance Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses for Lots Within the Planned Development Overlay Zone, Allowing Subdivision of One Lot into Two Lots, Construction of a Single-Family Residence, and Site Work Requiring a Grading Permit on Property Zoned O:PD. Located at 120 Oak Meadow Drive. APN 529-10-131. Subdivision Application M-20-011, Planned Development Application PD-20-002, Architecture and Site Application S-22-021. Categorically Exempt Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15315: Minor Land Divisions; 15303: New Construction; and 15304:

Minor Alterations to Land. Property Owners: Marty and Penny McFarland.

Applicant: Terence J. Szewczyk (M-20-011 and PD-20-002). Applicant: Jay Plett, Architect (S-22-021). Project Planner: Sean Mullin.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt an ordinance (Attachment 1) establishing development standards and allowable uses for lots within the Planned Development Overlay Zone, allowing subdivision of one lot into two lots, construction of a single-family residence, and site work requiring a grading permit on property zoned O:PD located at 120 Oak Meadow Drive.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of January 21, 2025, the Town Council held a public hearing to consider a request for modification of Planned Development Ordinance 1412 to allow subdivision of one lot into two lots, construction of a single-family residence, and site work requiring a Grading

Page 30 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

PAGE 2 OF 2
SUBJECT: 120 Oak Meadow Drive/M-20-011, PD-20-002, S-22-021 DATE: January 31, 2025
Permit on property located at 120 Oak Meadow Drive. The Council adopted a resolution approving the Subdivision and Architecture and Site applications and introduced an ordinance repealing and replacing Planned Development Ordinance 1412 by a unanimous vote.

This ordinance is returning to the Town Council for final adoption. The ordinance will take effect 30 days after its adoption.

COORDINATION:

This report was coordinated with the offices of the Town Manager and Town Attorney.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Sections 15315: Minor Land Divisions; 15303: New Construction; and 15304: Minor Alterations to Land.

ATTACHMENT:

1. Draft Ordinance

Page 31 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 1 of 4 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date

DRAFT ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS REPEALING AND REPLACING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 1412

ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND ALLOWABLE USES FOR LOTS WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE.

THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION I. Planned Development Overlay Zone
Ordinance No. 1412 is repealed and replaced with this Ordinance to retain the existing properties that are in the Planned Development Overlay Zone (shown in Exhibit A) and change the zoning of the property shown on the map (shown in Exhibit B), from O:PD (Office, Planned Development) to O:PD (Office, Planned Development).

SECTION II. Uses and Improvements Authorized.

A. The following construction and use of improvements are authorized within the Planned Development Overlay Zone:

1. Demolition of an existing one-story residential structure.

2. Conversion of an existing two-story medical office structure into a residential townhouse unit.

3. Construction of 10 two-story residential townhouse units.

4. Landscaping, parking, and limited tree removal as may be granted under precise plan approval.

5. For that area within the boundary of the townhouse complex as shown on the Official Development Plan, the uses are those specified in the R-M (Multiple Family Residential) zone by Sections 29.040.610 (Permitted Uses) and 29.40.615 (Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance (as those sections exist at the time of the adoption of this ordinance or as they may be amended in the future). However, no use listed in Section 29.40.615 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this ordinance or by conditional use permit.

B. In addition to the foregoing construction and use of improvements, this ordinance authorizes a Planning application for the following construction and use of improvements for property located at 120 Oak Meadow Drive (APN 529-10-131) as shown on the Official Development Plan:

1. Subdivision of one 17,699-square foot lot addressed as 120 Oak Meadow Drive (APN 529-10-131) into two lots consisting of Parcel A (11,906 square feet) and Parcel B (5,793 square feet);
Draft Ordinance: subject to modification
by Town Council based on deliberations
and direction
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 32 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 2 of 4 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date

2. Lot coverage of 40.3 percent on Parcel A;

3. Construction of a single-family residence and site improvements requiring a Grading Permit on Parcel B.

4. Lot coverage of 42.6 percent on Parcel B;

5. Reduced setbacks for the single-family residence on Parcel B of no less than:

Front: 6 feet
Rear: 7 feet
Side (north): 3 feet

6. Portions of the single-family residence on Parcel B as shown on the Official Development Plan located in the Least Restrictive Development Area as defined by the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines;

7. A driveway serving Parcel B with a maximum slope of 17.5 percent.

SECTION III. Compliance with Other Development Standards.

For all areas within the Planned Development Overlay Zone, the development standards of the Town Code Sections 29.40.640 and 29.40.645 shall apply. All general provisions in Article 3 of the Zoning Ordinance apply, and the provision of Chapters Article IV, Residential Zones and Article V, Nonresidential Zones of the Zoning Ordinance apply to the residential and nonresidential portion of the Planned Development respectively except when the Official Development Plan specifically shows otherwise.

SECTION IV. Permits.

With regard to the property at 120 Oak Meadow Drive, Architecture and Site approval, Subdivision approval, recordation of the Parcel Map, and issuance of all required permits is required before construction work for the single-family residence on Parcel B as shown in the Official Development Plan.

SECTION V. Official Development Plan.

With regard to the property at 120 Oak Meadow Drive, the attached Exhibit A (Map), Exhibit B (Site Plan), Exhibit C (Unit A Plan), Exhibit D (Unit B Plan), Exhibit E (Tentative Map), Exhibit F (Civil Plans for Parcel B), and Exhibit G (Architectural Plans for Parcel B), are part of the Official Development Plan.

SECTION VI. Performance Standards.

The Planned Development Overlay zone requires the following performance standards:

1. The applicant shall dedicate sanitary and storm sewer easements, to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer.

2. The applicant shall guarantee, by contract and bond, the following improvements, to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer:

3. A 20 foot curb-to-curb roadway (with narrower sections where necessary to avoid

Page 33 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 3 of 4 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
significant tree growth) including curb and gutters and paving, from Roberts Road to Forrest Avenue.

4. Sanitary and storm sewers as required.

5. The applicant shall provide a final grading, drainage and traffic circulation plan, to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer.

6. If any indication of archeological remains are encountered during construction activities, all such activities should cease immediately until a qualified archeologist can ascertain. the nature of the discovery and recommend mitigation if necessary.

SECTION VII. Severability.

In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction holds any Section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise invalid, the invalid portion shall be severed from this Ordinance and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town hereby declares that it would have adopted each Section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases in this Ordinance might be declared unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise invalid.

SECTION VIII. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

With regard to the previous Planned Development Overlay Zone, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Planned Development and was certified by the Town Council on November 20, 1978.

With regard to 120 Oak Meadow Drive, the Town Council finds that the Project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Sections 15315: Minor Land Divisions; 15303: New Construction; and 15304: Minor Alterations to Land.

SECTION IX. Publication.

SECTION X. Effective Date.

Page 34 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 4 of 4 ends

Draft Ordinance Adoption Date
COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:
_______________________________

MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
___________________________________

TOWN CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA

Page 35 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

ROBERTS RD

N CREEK TRAIL

BLOSSOM HILL RD

FORREST AV

OAK MEADOW DR

OHLONE CT

BRICKWAY CT

TOWN OF LOS GATOS
Application No.

Change of zoning map amending the Town Zoning Ordinance.

Zone Change
Prezoning
From: O:PD To: O:PD
PD-20-002 A.P.N. # 529-10-126, -127, -128, -129, -130,
-131, -132, -133, -134, -135, -136,
-137, and -999
Forwarded by Planning Commission
Approved by Town Council
Clerk Administrator:

Date:

Mayor:

Date: December 11, 2024
Ord:
§
Santa Clara
County
Town of
Los Gatos
(;+,%,7$

Page 36 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 37 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 38 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 39 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

q~ Ŏ
Ŏ
+Ŏ:÷
+9Ŏ
Ŏ

Ŏ
ŎûŎŎ:Ŏ
ŎfŎ*9ŎùgŎŎ9

+Ĳ
Ŏ*Ŏ
*9
*Ŏ5
Ŏp
+Ŏ
Ŏp
q~ Ŏ
Ŏ
Ŏr~+Ŏg Ŏ
Ŏp~Ŏ
Ŏ*
Ŏ ŎŎ
ĸp~s~t~u~
~ Ŏp~f pŎ*Ŏ:Ŏv~ø:
Ŏ

x{uyP{ª h\sPª

DM`DKPsª y{uyP{ª hdsPª

}{PPª KPsP{ªi]sPª
H\hM]sWª }PHDKeª h\sP}ª
PD}PpPsª
{uDM(yDPpPsª
K{Hª
K{Hª DsMª W{ª &ª'¦§
ª
KusK{PPª ¢ª £ª¤ª
Kusu{ª pDau{ª
Kusu{ª p\su{ª 501
HhuKeª {PD]s\sWª Dhhª
{uKeª {PD]s\sWª Dhhª
M{\PDª
H\hM]sWª @ACBª
DKª HP{pª
}Ds\D{ª }PP{ªh\sPª
PiPK{]Kªh\sPª Q
WD}ªh\sPª

`u\sª{PsKZª

}u{pª M{D\sªi]sPª
DP{ª l]sPª
¥
uP{ZPDMª {Pª
PD{ZPsª }DiPª
c8 ;-ªc8 02ª
060 :ª

08!=-ª

r¨ª
06:!-=ª066!;<ª06:!)-ª

=>@
062"<+ª ª 066-ª
062!:=ª jª

063"=ª
!
066 0ª
06ª!ª
NRª ~RR
ª 0 ~RELfª
060":=ª
ª02;"6,ª
026!-:ª ª
04"=0ª
021!:6ª
060#-:ª
c20"ª
09";2ª06;":2ª
08"20ª
09 ;;ª
06;!:6ª
062",0ª
066!:-ª060!==ª060!2)ª
060"=0ª
060!+,ª

06.<ª
mtOªwªSª

'@ vFgªqSFOvªO|_ª
,20@ "* *@
6; ;ª

mtOªwªO|ª

@ vFgª qSFOvªO|_ª
,20@ "*
@

?

Þ ÄÅŎ ºđĂ¶ 06; :6ª
'$@ /@

"@
@ vFgª qSFOvªO|_ª
Fzt>ª "*

@ @
GSF?ª '%*(
( @ 3
.
9@
02)!--ª ª

06;$<ª
06;"J06;"<0ª
©ª 7;!6+ª
06;"3;ª
06;"0ª
c8",2ª
I0O~

a9VS

ĳŎ002!0)ª
mtOª vUªOvYªV^TOkª|StFoªnª

@ vFgª qSFOvªO|_ª
,20@ #*
@

00.;<ª
4 &@
mtOª vUª vFgª qSFOvª O|^ªª
/*ª vFgª qSFOvªO|^ª
-1@ $
+

)@
FObFKStª I^kO^sXª

²Ŏ
ŇÑŎ ³ńÀŎbÇŅbÒŎ

µŎŋŎ
Ó

¯ÔŎ
:@ňÕŎ
ŉ ÖŎ ´ņbŎ ¡%ª ¯ŊŎ
×Ŏ;<@

~ ~

ZV04[~O0N8%~
=8O8V0H~TH0O~68XA=O0ZBQO&~
hQOBO=~68XB=O0[AQO'~
0TTHB402H8~TH0OX~0O6~X[0O60V6X'~
T0V49H~XAh9(~
I9=0I~69X4VBT[AQO(~
0TO)~
0a9V0=9~XIQT9*~
8eAX[BO=~V9XB69O49+~
8eAX[BO=~=0V0=8*~
O8d~T0V48I~0*~O8d~T0V48I~2*~
O8d~V8XA68O48,~
4AaBJ~8O=AO88V%~
TVQT8VZg~QdO8VX'~
TVQTQX96~HQ[X'~
TVQTQX96~_X8~
d0[9V~X`TTHg(~
X9d0=9~6AXTQX0H)~
\9H9T?QO9*~
=0X~~9H94[VB4*~
402H9~[a*~
<9N0~<mook~ionl+~
N4<0VJ0O6~<0NBKg~JQ[~XTA[~
N86A_N~68OXA[g~V8XA68OZB0H~
T6~Q<<A48~d~TH0OO86~68b8JQTN8O[~Qa8VH0g
T6~ hQOBO=~QV6AO0O48~OQ~

V8XB68O[A0J~68XB=O~=_A68HAO8X~HQ[~Qb8V~ ~ ~?AHJXB68
X[0O60V6X~<QV~HV60
~=V06AO=~6V0AO0=9
~6VAb9d0gX~
T0VGAO=
~=9QIQ=A4~X0<9[g~~V9[0BOBO=~d0IIX

"
!$$~X<~
~04V9X ~
ZV04[~!"
" V9=8O4g~4Q_VZ-~
IQ[~

~2QQG~" ~N0TX~

T0V49H~0+~X.~
~~
T0V49H~2+~X.~
# ~

~X<~

$!~X<~
"
~04 ~

"$
~X<~

04 ~
0TTVQe~
$!~X<~
Z8V8O48EXh8d4hcG~ZX4AaAH~8O=BO88VAO=
~BO4~

""!~Z84?OQJQ=g~6VBa8~
X0O~EQX8
~40~$
~
#
$
~8e[~

N0V[g~0P6~T8OOg~Nj<0VH0O6~

~Q0G~N806Qd~6VAb8~
IQX~=0[QX
~ 40~$

~

XAO=H9~<0NAHg~V9XB68O[A0I~
X0O~EQX9~d0[9V~4Q~
d9X[~a0II9g~X0OA[0Vg~6BX[VB4[~
0\\~
T=9~
<VQO[A9V~402I8~
e~
~
;fCY]CP>~U1W5;L~ UWRURY;7~ĞġăćĕŎŎ UWRURY;7~U1W5;M~3~
ĵ[$$ĎŎ [%Ŏ [%Ŏ ¥ö%Ŏ
&Ġī'ĊĆŎ
3&Ĉ3Ŏ Um-M.Ŏ!Ŏ Um-M.Ŏ!Ŏ U--MŎ!Ŏ
\ŎĖĨŎ\Ŏ /S

Ŏ7!Ŏ /}Áô.SŎ7!Ŏ ë
Ŏ7!Ŏ @
į&3ŎY%Ŏ zìL{°Ŏ z}LvcŎ {,vcŎ
¢ĉFŎ EFŎ(Ŏ 02J|í
Ŏ"Ŏ 0 2T=Ŏ"Ŏ Æ RJ=Ŏ"Ŏ
Z«,ŎYFŎVa(5Ŏ¹RN±»Ŏ TnNŎŎ <ÛTSŎŎ 0=Ŏ)Ŏ
d%h Y6_ŎVİ § <K;Ŏ]Ŏ <K;Ŏ]Ŏ çJ>;Ŏ)Ŏ @
Z«,Ŏ
u"
Ŏ
XŎ 1nõ=Ŏ¨"Ŏ .Ø/Ŏ .ÙŎ
Kþ2ĢŎ^Ŏ
4Ýļľċ4Ŏ äÚĤéŎ^Ŏ
4^ŎĽ44Ŏ

åŎŁĿŎ5
§
¬Ŏ êNŎ86@5
ŀ
5Ŏ¬Ŏ
d%h #ÿ'ß#ė'Ŏ' tQ;Ŏ tè2ðŎ @ Ü<îŎ @
1o/ŎŎ&BĥAB?Ŏ 1oñ/ŎŎģAB?Ŏ |
òŎŎ&7A?Ŏ ~OŎ©Ŏ\CŎ ~OŎ©Ŏ
'CŎ Ró>ŎŎ&3CŎ
8Ā@ĔŎG8(EĬ5Ŏ 6`ÂŎáŎĶ6£HŎ

6$_ŎeQĦ#8HŎ >Ŏ >Ŏ Ŏ

3
ŎG
čHŎ 1wŎ 1wŎ Ŏ
7 BŎGĺĚ#`¼Ŏ ý- OL2Ŏ Ŏ @
)ª
XªŎ)ŎeĻħ"ĩ½Ŏ 0QŎ 0
,ïŎ DuŎ

D
@8]ŎŎCa8ěDŎ'úęŎ_ĐŎ

¥##VŎķ$
ďŎ
XĭĘ`
6$¨ŎŎıĮŎā

WDĪ AŎ
)Ŏğ ?

ĄŎ¦(ČE(Z£@ ŎFŌ
)Ŏ
¢ŎĴŎÃaŎ¦WŎE(W
$@ ,Ŏ
MP}\WsPMª sMP{ª [ª

~ ~
~
~

~BO~<99Z ~
~ üŎ

~

P
¡Ŏ¡Ŏēł
yyPŎ·Ŏw~PĜ¸

ōŎ ĝ
ijIIkpqÌ Ŏ x
y~®Ŏ®
z{ |~

¤
ĒŎ
ą

ijIkÈpqrÐ
7xŎ
}~ ~ x¤
æ¾¿llÉÊËÏàŎ
60\9+~ $
~
ÍrâŎ X40J8&~
~/
~~ ~
ÎsãŎ
6V0dO~2g&~ 6G@~
X_Va9g96~2g&~
ĹsŃŎ
TVQF~9O=V(~ [FX~ D~
4?94G~2g+~ ^FX~ :~
X?98[~OQ~

Q<~ ~ X?99[X~
FQ2~OQ~

9e?A2AZ~9

Page 40 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

BRIDGE
(20'R /W)
(PRIVATE STREET)

OAK MEADOW DRIVE

OAK MEADOW DRIVE
1 2 3 4 5 6
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
UFF 357.0
LFF 347.5
*36 SF OF

FALLS WIT

EXCEPTIO

ELEVATED CONCRETE

DECK TO PROTECT
TREE
EX. 10' SSE 558 D110

MECHANICAL ROOM

GARAGE CORNER

THIN LRDA

ON IS REQUESTED
C-2

SITE PLAN
1"=10'
DKH
TJSTJS
40 20 10 0 20
1" = 10'

GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET ) E STAT OF CAL I FORN I A
NO. 35527

EER IN GNE LAN IOSSEFORP DERETSI GER
YK ZC EW ZS . J ECNERET
EXP. 9-30-23
DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SURVEYED BY:PROJ ENGR:CHECK BY:

SHEET NO. JOB NO.
120 OAK MEADOW DRIVE
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
APN 529-10-131

LANDS OF MCFARLAND
120 OAK MEADOW DRIVE

MINOR SUBDIVISION AND

PD ZONING AMENDMENT
20-207
FAX: 408.837.7550 PH: 408.452.9300
TS/CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
1776 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
OF 4 SHEETS
8-17-23

REVISIONS
3 BY
2 1
6 5
4 DATE
HOUSE
0 12 GARAGE
DRIVEWAY 48
YARD
188
CUT

EARTHWORK SUMMARY
37 0
FILL
00 211 CY TO BE HAULED OFF SITE
-

2.5'
8'5'
--
3 -
CU. YDS. CU. YDS. MAX. DEPTH MAX. DEPTH
248 TOTAL 37
N.T.S.

EARTHEN SWALE
(;+,%,7)

Page 41 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

UFF 357.0
LFF 347.5

OAK MEADOW DRIVE (PRIVATE STREET)
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
PL CL
GARAGE
C-3

DRIVEWAY PROFILE
1"=10'
DKH
TJSTJS
40 20 10 0 20
1" = 10'

GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET ) E STAT OF CAL I FORN I A
NO. 35527

EER IN GNE LAN IOSSEFORP DERETSI GER
YK ZC EW ZS . J ECNERET
EXP. 9-30-23
DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SURVEYED BY:PROJ ENGR:CHECK BY:

SHEET NO. JOB NO.
120 OAK MEADOW DRIVE
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
APN 529-10-131

LANDS OF MCFARLAND
120 OAK MEADOW DRIVE

MINOR SUBDIVISION AND

PD ZONING AMENDMENT
20-207
FAX: 408.837.7550 PH: 408.452.9300
OF 4 SHEETS
8-17-23

REVISIONS
3 BY
2 1
6 5
4 DATE

DRIVEWAY PLAN

DRIVEWAY PROFILE
N.T.S.

GRAVEL BASIN DETAIL

Page 42 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

PL PL PL A

PL PL A
C-4

SITE CROSS SECTIONS
1"=10'
DKH
TJSTJS
40 20 10 0 20
1" = 10'

GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET ) E STAT OF CAL I FORN I A
NO. 35527

EER IN GNE LAN IOSSEFORP DERETSI GER
YK ZC EW ZS . J ECNERET
EXP. 9-30-23
DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SURVEYED BY:PROJ ENGR:CHECK BY:

SHEET NO. JOB NO.
120 OAK MEADOW DRIVE
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
APN 529-10-131

LANDS OF MCFARLAND
120 OAK MEADOW DRIVE

MINOR SUBDIVISION AND

PD ZONING AMENDMENT
20-207
FAX: 408.837.7550 PH: 408.452.9300
OF 4 SHEETS
8-17-23

REVISIONS
3 BY
2 1
6 5
4 DATE

SECTION A-A

SECTION B-B

Page 43 ends

ITEM NO. 5.
$0/4536$5*0/4*5&"$$&44
&G@Q<ODJIM@I?@MDIB

&9)*#*5(

Page 44 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

!

"
#$

%&&%'

()%*

"

()%*

+

,
#
-

()5$2
()5$2,

%&&%'

.#

012"3'42
1203'42
012
3

.#

61263'42
012
3

57 -

-

8
89-:
&;<&=+= / > 6

?/6 "!"
&;<&=+= "0" > 6
>>
?/"6 "!"&;<&=+= "0/ > 6
>>
?/ 0 "!"
&;<&=+=
>"/
>>
?!/

&;<&=+= 0 >6
?
/
&;<&=+= 0
/ > !
?66
"&;<&=+= "

/6
?
"

.#

&;<&=+= / "0 0"6
? "66?/
&)&*@(
>6$58
,

A8

-

>>$58
,

A8

-

#5

B

.#

,$ 5#,
5

#-
$58
,

! "!
! #$%! &'('
!)

Page 45 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 46 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 47 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

KG<O@C@DBCO
<OPKK@MG@Q@G

Page 48 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 49 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

Page 50 ends

ITEM NO. 5.

PREPARED BY: Nicolle Burnham
Parks and Public Works Director
Reviewed by: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Finance Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 6
DATE: January 30, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the Town Manager to Execute the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with DKS Associates to Extend the Term of the Agreement to September 30, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the Town Manager to execute the second amendment (Attachment 1) to the Agreement for Consultant Services with DKS Associates to extend the term of the agreement to September 30, 2025.

BACKGROUND:

On March 1, 2022, the Town Council authorized the Town Manager to execute an Agreement for Consulting Services with DKS Associates for $160,505 to prepare a Transportation Impact Fee Study. The agreement term is through February 28, 2025. This agreement was executed following the Town’s issuance of a Request for Proposal for this project.

On April 16, 2024, the Town Council authorized the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consulting Services to increase the compensation by $6,142 for a total agreement amount of $166,647. This increase was to provide additional analysis requested by the Town Council at its meeting on April 2, 2024.

DISCUSSION:

Staff and DKS have continued to complete the additional analysis requested by Town Council in April 2024. However, this work will not be finalized before the contract end date of February 28, 2025. The Second Amendment will extend the term of the contract to a sufficient period of time to complete the work.

Page 51 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

PAGE 2 OF 2
SUBJECT: Second Amendment to DKS Agreement
DATE: January 30, 2025
CONCLUSION:

The proposed second amendment is expected to provide adequate time for the current analysis to be completed.

COORDINATION:

This staff report was coordinated with the Finance Director and Town Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no fiscal impacts for this action as there is no change to the contract amount proposed.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

This is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required.

Attachment:

1. Second Amendment to Agreement – DKS Associates

Page 52 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Second Amendment to Agreement for Consultant Services
DKS Associates

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

PREAMBLE
This Second Amendment to Agreement for Consultant Services is dated for identification on this 4th day of February 2025 and amends that certain First Amendment to Agreement for Consultant Services dated April 17, 2024, made by and between the Town of Los Gatos, ("Town,") and DKS Associates (“Consultant”) identified as an S Corporation and whose address is 1970 Broadway, Suite 740 Oakland, CA 94612.

I. RECITALS
A. Town and Consultant entered into Agreement for Consultant Services on March 1, 2022, (“Agreement”) anda First Amendment to Agreement for Consultant Services on April 17, 2024, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A to this Amendment.

B. Town desires to amend the Agreement to add to the term of the Agreement.

II. AMENDMENT
A. Section 2.2 Term and Time of Performance is amended to read:

This Agreement will remain in effect from March 1, 2022 to September 30, 2025.

B. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 53 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Second Amendment to Agreement for Consultant Services
DKS Associates
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and Consultant have executed this Amendment.

Town of Los Gatos by:
________________________________________
Chris Constantin, Town Manager
DKS Associates by:
________________________________________
Carl Springer, Principal DKS
Recommended by:
________________________________________
Nicolle Burnham,
Director of Parks and Public Works
Approved as to Form:
________________________________________
Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney
Attest:
________________________________________
Wendy Wood, CMC, Town Clerk

Page 54 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

Page 1 of 2 ends

DKS Associates – First Amendment

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is dated for identification this 17th day of April 2024 and amends that certain (AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION) dated March 1st, 2022 made by and between the Town of Los Gatos, ("Town,") and the DKS Associates (“Consultant”) identified as an S Corporation and whose address is 1970 Broadway, Suite 740 Oakland, CA 94612.

RECITALS
A. Town and Consultant entered into a Consulting Agreement on April 17, 2022, (“Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A to this Amendment.

B. Town desires to amend the Agreement to complete additional analysis as defined in Exhibit B to this Amendment.

AMENDMENT

1. Section 2.1 Scope of Services is amended to read as follows:

Consultant shall provide services as described in that certain Proposal sent to the Town on April 12, 2024, which is hereby incorporated by reference and attached as Exhibit B.

2. Section 2.6 Compensation is amended to read as follows:

Additional compensation for Consultant’s professional services shall be increased by $6,142 for a total agreement amount not to exceed $166,647 inclusive of all costs. Payment shall be based upon Town approval of each task based on Exhibit B.

3. Section 3.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance is amended to read as follows:

Service Provider agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability Insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

4. Section 4.6 Notices is amended to change the Consultant address as follows:

DKS Associates
1050 SW 6th Ave, Suite 600
Portland, OR 97204

5. All other items and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

EXHIBIT B

Page 55 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

Page 2 of 2 ends

DKS Associates – First Amendment
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and Consultant have executed this Amendment.

Town of Los Gatos: Approved as to Consent:
_______________________________ ______________________________ Laurel Prevetti, Town Manager Carl Springer, Principal DKS Department Approval:
_______________________________________
Nicolle Burnham
Director of Parks and Public Works
Approved as to Form: Attest:
______________________________ ______________________________ Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney Wendy Wood, CMC, Town Clerk DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8 4/17/2024
4/17/2024
4/30/2024
5/3/2024
5/3/2024

Page 56 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 11, 2024
TO: Nicolle Burnham| Town of Los Gatos
FROM: Erin Vaca | DKS Associates
SUBJECT: Scope and Budget Amendment for Los Gatos TIF Update Project #22046-000

INTRODUCTION
This memorandum summarizes the proposed scope and budget amendment to complete the update of the Los Gatos Transportation Impact Fee (TIF). DKS previously submitted a nexus study which was accepted by Town staff and adopted by the Town Council in January 2024.

Subsequently, additional direction was received from the Town Council to significantly rework the analysis using a different methodology.

The proposed scope and budget necessary to respond to the Council’s direction are detailed in the following sections. The task numbers listed below correspond to the existing budget structure.

SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This proposal includes up to two hours for the DKS project manager to meet with Town staff in addition to one Town Council meeting. DKS will review the staff report and assist with presentation materials for the Town Council meeting if required.

Deliverables: Preparation and attendance at one Council meeting, meeting materials TASK 3 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LIST
DKS will also work with staff to review the supplemental funding amounts available for each project. DKS will also escalate project costs to 2024 dollars using the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco Bay Area.

EXHIBIT B
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 57 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

LOS GATOS TIF UPDATE• SCOPE AND BUDGET AMENDMENT• APRIL 2024 2 DKS will conduct a fair share traffic analysis of the SR-17 project. The fair share traffic analysis will apply the Santa Clara VTA travel demand model to calculate the future (year 2040) proportion of over-capacity traffic on SR-17 that is associated with growth in Los Gatos. The resulting fair share cost allocation factor will be applied to the full project cost.

Deliverables: Updated project list (Excel format), fair share traffic calculation summary (Excel format)
TASK 4 FEE REVENUE ESTIMATION
The DKS team will prepare two new versions of the fee calculations:

Option 1 will apply a growth fair share percentage to total allocated project costs.

Option 2 will apply a growth fair share percentage to all allocated project costs except for the SR17 project. The SR-17 project costs will be allocated to the fee calculation in proportion to the share of over-capacity traffic associated with growth in Los Gatos.

This task will also include a workshop session to brainstorm alternative methods for assessing the “fair share” percentage. This subtask assumes a two-hour, virtual meeting to be attended by the DKS project manager, the Urban Economics project manager, and one additional senior DKS staff.

Recommendations resulting from the workshop will be documented in a brief technical memorandum. Any significant additional work stemming from the workshop recommendations will be delivered under a separate contract amendment.

Deliverables: “Fair Share” Workshop and Technical Memorandum; Fee calculation workbooks (Excel format).

TASK 6 DRAFT AND FINAL NEXUS REPORTS
DKS will confirm the recommended option for fee calculation with Town staff. The nexus report will be updated to reflect the recommended approach. DKS will respond to a single set of comments on the administrative draft (to Town staff) and the public draft (to Town Council) to prepare a final nexus report.

Deliverables: administrative draft, draft, and final nexus reports.

BUDGET
The proposed budget for the additional scope is $18,440 as summarized in the attached table.

SCHEDULE
DKS will complete the analysis and public draft nexus report within six weeks of notice to proceed.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 58 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

LOS GATOS TIF UPDATE• SCOPE AND BUDGET AMENDMENT• APRIL 2024 3 Approved by:
(Client Name)
By:

Title Date
DKS Associates
A Corporation
Carl Springer, PE, PTP
Principal
Erin Vaca, TE, AICP
Project Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 59 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

LOS GATOS TIF UPDATE• SCOPE AND BUDGET AMENDMENT• APRIL 2024 3 TABLE 1: BUDGET ESTIMATE

ADDITIONAL BUDGET BY TASK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 60 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

TRANSACTION DETAILS DOCUMENT DETAILS
Reference Number
D3B1A7AF-BB94-4361-AE16-151153BEB42B
Transaction Type
Signature Request
Sent At
04/15/2024 16:26 EDT
Executed At
04/15/2024 16:39 EDT
Identity Method
email
Distribution Method
email
Signed Checksum
a96e84815a7fb7bf09a0e2d1bc755927f583a817719327082fd863dfe3250046 Signer Sequencing
Disabled
Document Passcode
Disabled
Document Name
Scope and Budget Amendment Proposal v2
Filename
Scope_and_Budget_Amendment_Proposal_v2.pdf
Pages
4 pages
Content Type
application/pdf
File Size

1.05 MB
Original Checksum
46913fcc1f4a59daf6e1b54e571bab197f9f11d019e919469ae91265da53f510

SIGNERS

SIGNER E-SIGNATURE EVENTS
Name
Erin Vaca
Email
[email protected]
Components
1 Status
signed
Multi-factor Digital Fingerprint Checksum
c5dbfc1b4c89464b17d5d7603d2a421225d90ecc823f7f387d052ac41d3e66bb IP Address

75.54.231.47
Device
Chrome via Windows
Typed Signature
Signature Reference ID
92B2FA1A
Viewed At
04/15/2024 16:39 EDT
Identity Authenticated At
04/15/2024 16:39 EDT
Signed At
04/15/2024 16:39 EDT
Name
Carl Springer
Email
[email protected]
Components
1 Status
signed
Multi-factor Digital Fingerprint Checksum
4c579aea16bbd51e8ff9d6d06dd6578c389c0155adc7799d687479a2feb84587 IP Address
206.198.132.30
Device
Chrome via Mac
Typed Signature
Signature Reference ID
2E67F51B
Viewed At
04/15/2024 16:28 EDT
Identity Authenticated At
04/15/2024 16:29 EDT
Signed At
04/15/2024 16:29 EDT
AUDITS

TIMESTAMP AUDIT
04/15/2024 16:26 EDT Elizabeth Aguilar ([email protected]) created document 'Scope_and_Budget_Amendment_Proposal_v2.pdf' on Chrome via Windows from 73.12.137.5. 04/15/2024 16:26 EDT Erin Vaca ([email protected]) was emailed a link to sign. 04/15/2024 16:26 EDT Carl Springer ([email protected]) was emailed a link to sign. 04/15/2024 16:28 EDT Carl Springer ([email protected]) viewed the document on Chrome via Mac from 206.198.132.30. 04/15/2024 16:29 EDT Carl Springer ([email protected]) authenticated via email on Chrome via Mac from 206.198.132.30. 04/15/2024 16:29 EDT Carl Springer ([email protected]) signed the document on Chrome via Mac from 206.198.132.30.

SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE

REFERENCE NUMBER
D3B1A7AF-BB94-4361-AE16-151153BEB42B
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 61 ends

ITEM NO. 6.
04/15/2024 16:39 EDT Erin Vaca ([email protected]) viewed the document on Chrome via Windows from 75.54.231.47. 04/15/2024 16:39 EDT Erin Vaca ([email protected]) authenticated via email on Chrome via Windows from 75.54.231.47. 04/15/2024 16:39 EDT Erin Vaca ([email protected]) signed the document on Chrome via Windows from 75.54.231.47.

TIMESTAMP AUDIT
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 62 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 63 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 64 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 65 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 66 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 67 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 68 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 69 ends

ITEM NO. 6.
to Agreement Dated
March 2022
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 70 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 71 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 72 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 73 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 74 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 75 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 76 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 77 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 78 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 79 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 80 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 81 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 82 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 83 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 84 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 85 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 86 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 87 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 88 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 89 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 90 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 91 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 92 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 93 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 94 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 95 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 96 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 97 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 98 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 99 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 100 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 101 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 102 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 103 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 104 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 105 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 106 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 107 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 108 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 109 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 110 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 111 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 112 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A3A45C8-2C40-4F2F-828D-D2068EEF6CF8

Page 113 ends

ITEM NO. 6.

PREPARED BY: Alexa Nolder
Administrative Technician
Reviewed by: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, Town Attorney, Community Development Director, and Finance Director
110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 7
DATE: January 27, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the Town Manager to Execute an Agreement not to exceed $189,646 with Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. for Consulting Services to Update and Provide Additional Objective Design Standards for Qualifying MultiFamily and Mixed-Use Residential Developments.

RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the Town Manager to execute an agreement not to exceed $189,6464 with Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. for consulting services to update and provide additional Objective Design Standards for qualifying multi-family and mixed-use residential developments.

BACKGROUND:

On May 7, 2024, the Town Council voted to direct staff to approach M-Group, the consultant that assisted in drafting the Town’s Objective Design Standards, and request a proposal to work on additional standards related to view standards, architectural styles, and high-quality building design. Further, the Town Council asked that M-Group speak to their experience developing objective design standards for these topics.

At the meeting of August 6, 2024, staff presented M-Group’s proposal, and the Council requested that staff issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to qualified providers to address the development of objective design standards in the following areas:

High-quality building design: Objective standards are to focus on façade materials to ensure high-quality building design that reflects the existing character of the Town.

Page 114 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

PAGE 2 OF 3
SUBJECT: Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

DATE: January 27, 2025
Architectural style: Objective standards must evaluate the architecture within the immediate neighborhood to determine the architectural styles that are consistent and appropriate for the neighborhood.

Height transitions: Objective standards shall provide effective strategies for appropriate massing transitions between zones/densities (i.e., from new multi-story buildings to singlefamily neighborhoods). Consideration of solar access impacts are also to be evaluated.

All new objective design standards should also consider small, multi-family housing.

The Town distributed an RFP in September 2024 and received three proposals from Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc., PlaceWorks, and Opticos Designs. Staff interviewed each candidate since all submissions met the qualifications provided in the RFP. After interviewing the three qualified candidates, staff selected Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. based on their experience, timeline, and qualifications provided in their proposal (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

The Objective Design Standards Consultant (Consultant) will help develop and update the Town’s current Objective Design Standards to include information related to high-quality building design, architectural style, height transitions, and small, multi-family housing. The new objective design standards would be developed to be consistent with the existing Objective Design Standards for Qualifying Multi-Family and Mixed-Use Residential Development, as well as the 2040 General Plan for the review of qualifying housing development applications. Typical services of the Consultant include, but are not limited to: meeting with staff; reviewing and analyzing the adopted Objective Design Standards along with the direction of the Town Council provided at the August 6, 2024 Town Council Meeting; reviewing and analyzing planning documents such as the General Plan 2040 (including 2020 Land Use and Community Design Elements) and Chapter 29 of the Town Code (Zoning Regulations); attending public meetings; preparation of final documents for adoption; and recommendations for next steps.

CONCLUSION:

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. was determined to be the best candidate to serve as the Town’s Consultant for the following reasons:
 Extensive experience working with Municipalities in the same, or similar capacity;  An understanding of how to develop Objective Design Standards with Density Bonus Law in mind; and
 Existing partnerships with Urban Planning Partners who will provide many opportunities for community engagement and collaboration to ensure all voices are heard.

Page 115 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

PAGE 3 OF 3
SUBJECT: Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

DATE: January 27, 2025
COORDINATION:

The draft Agreement for Consultant Services (Attachment 2) was prepared in coordination with the Town Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed project totals provided in the Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. proposal is not to exceed $124,832 for the project scope and an additional $64,814 for optional tasks, totaling $189,646.

These costs do not include Town staff time.

Funding for the Objective Design Standards update will come from the General Plan Update Fund. Sufficient funds are available in this account.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

This action is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. Proposal

2. Draft Agreement for Consultant Services

Page 116 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

TOWN OF LOS GATOS
Updated/Additional Objective
Design Standards for Qualifying
Multi-Family and Mixed-Use
Residential Developments
Response to Request for Proposals
October 26, 2024

Page 117 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 118 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER LETTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 CERTIFICATION FORMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 REVIEW OF SCOPE OF SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Urban Planning Partners, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PERSONNEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 TIMELINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 SAMPLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 DISCLOSURE OF LITIGATION/DISCIPLINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 INSURANCE COVERAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 PRELIMINARY FEE SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

Page 119 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
2 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC.

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 120 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

COVER LETTER
October 26, 2024
Sean Mullin, Planning Manager
Alexa Nolder, Administrative Technician
Town of Los Gatos
Community Development Department
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
(408) 354-6864
[email protected]
Re: Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. Proposal for Objective Design Standards Consultant Services Dear Sean and Alexa,
On behalf of our qualified and motivated team, we are pleased to submit this proposal to provide the Town of Los Gatos with professional services for the development of complete Objective Design Standards that reflect the Town's unique scale and character and meet the community's high standards for building design. As a firm that is dedicated to working with California communities to ensure compliance with state housing legislation and to ensure that the community’s priorities and preferences are reflected in design standards, this is a target project for us.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC) is uniquely qualified to lead this engagement given our expertise in California housing law, experience completing Objective Design Standards in similar communities, and deep resume of rezoning, zoning code updates, and community design. LWC’s resume includes creating feasible and SB330-compliant Objective Design Standards in communities such as Portola Valley, Saratoga, Piedmont, Los Altos, South San Francisco, Woodland, Seal Beach, Millbrae, Marin County, and Beaumont, as well as leading 16 successful Housing Element Updates in the 6th Cycle.

In our ODS engagements, we bring not only a deep knowledge of codes and buildings, but also expertise in custom visualizations using a combination of SketchUp and Illustrator (see Task 3B), as well as related analysis to ensure that proposed standards result in economically feasible projects (see Optional Task C).

Our Team also includes Oakland-based Urban Planning Partners (UPP), experts in planning policy, development services, and community engagement. UPP will work closely with LWC and the Town to implement an inclusive and substantive community engagement effort and to support the Team in key document review and context assessment. LWC and UPP have a proven partnership in the successful delivery of objective design standards in Saratoga and Portola Valley.

Our Team is further uniquely qualified for this project given the skills and experience of the project team members. As the President and CEO of LWC with over 30 years of leading complex planning

Page 121 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
engagements, I will be the Principal in Charge and responsible for compliance with the tenets of the contract, accurate invoicing, adherence with the timeline and assurance that deliverables are of the highest quality. David Bergman, LWC Director, brings over 25 years of experience. David led successful 6th Cycle Housing Elements and Rezoning projects in Novato, Piedmont, Alameda County and Long Beach. David will serve as Director in Charge and set strategies for research and deliverables, assure milestones are met and deliverables are complete, accurate, and exceed the Town’s expectations.

Monica Szydlik brings over 18 years of architecture and urban planning expertise. Monica led successful Objective Design Standard projects in Los Altos, Piedmont, South San Francisco, Saratoga, Woodland, and Millbrae, and residential guidelines in Redwood City. Monica will serve as Project Manager and oversee all research, development of draft and final documents, and close communication with the Town and internal team. Monica and I work out of LWC’s San Francisco office.

From UPP, Curtis Banks brings over 30 years in planning and community development, having managed a wide variety of residential and non-residential projects. Curtis has spent his entire career working for communities in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties (including as consultant to Los Gatos) and is currently overseeing projects in Saratoga and Newark. Carla Violet brings over 10 years of urban planning, community design experience. Carla has managed several community outreach and engagement efforts customized to address specific project objectives, anticipated challenges and opportunities, and community concerns. Carla will oversee the UPP team’s close collaboration with LWC and execution of technical design elements that prioritize the highly valued aesthetics of neighborhood and community character in Los Gatos.

As our qualifications indicate, LWC and UPP are leaders in creating development regulations and design standards that facilitate the production of diverse housing opportunities and compliant, prosperous and equitable communities.

The LWC/UPP Team appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal, and the Town’s contract template is acceptable to our Team. We look forward to your positive response and remain available to provide additional input or respond to questions or comments.

Sincerely,
Lisa Wise, AICP, President, CEO
870 Market Street, Suite 977
San Francisco, CA 94102
[email protected]
(805) 595-1345

Page 122 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

CERTIFICATION FORMS

Page 123 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Page 124 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Page 125 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Task 1: Project Initiation and Analysis
A. Project Initiation Meeting and Site Tour. The
consulting team will meet in-person with Town staff
to discuss the goals and priorities for the Updated/
Additional Objective Design Standards; finalize the work program, timeline, and milestones; discuss the outreach program; and clarify roles and responsibilities. Following the meeting, Town staff will lead the team on a tour of the Town to understand existing character, visit key
housing opportunity sites, and document the intensity,
forms, and character of Los Gatos neighborhoods. A
key part of the tour will be a discussion about the Town staff’s experience with community expectations and
what is important from a design perspective to achieve
desired development outcome.

B. Technical Analysis, Site Analysis, and Evaluation.

LWC will prepare a Technical Analysis, Site Analysis and Evaluation that addresses the following:
• Applicable ordinances, plans, and policy documents
including General Plan 2040, Residential Design
Guidelines, Commercial Design Guidelines, and
Chapter 29 of the Town Code (Zoning Regulations).
• The adopted Objective Design Standards and
Checklist (yes/no and B.4.3 points system).
• Evaluation of existing typical development projects
that demonstrate local context and character.
• Documentation of recent, pipeline, and proposed
development projects.
• Council direction related to high-quality building
design, architectural style, and height transitions.
• Design and feasibility considerations for small multifamily housing types including townhomes, triplexes and fourplexes, “house-scale” small multi-unit
buildings, and other small-scale configurations.

Prior to preparation of the Analyses and Evaluation, the consulting team will prepare and submit to the Town a
data request for material related to the Project. This may include but is not limited to unpublished GP and Zoning amendments, a list of Staff’s zoning interpretations,
minutes of hearing design review discussions, GIS
data, original files from the adopted Objective Design
Standards, and other material relevant to the Project.

REVIEW OF SCOPE OF SERVICES
C. Updated/Additional Objective Design Standards
Recommendations Memo. Based on the Technical
Analyses and Town staff comments, the consulting team
will prepare a Recommendations Memo. The Memo will
outline recommendations for:
• Revised content. Changes to existing standards
and recommended new standards, with a focus on
building massing, height transitions, building design
and articulation, and architectural style, and Town
character and scale. This includes recommendations
for revisions to existing graphics/illustrations and
preparation of new graphics/illustrations.
• Organization and implementation. How the
material may be added to or integrated within the
existing Town’s regulatory framework to facilitate
streamlined ministerial review. This includes
recommendations for how the standards may be
administered and reviewed (yes/no, point system,
allowed modifications, etc.).

Task 2: Community Engagement
A. Community Engagement Program. LWC will
prepare a Community Engagement Program outlining
a public process that enables the community to review
and comment on the Updated/Additional Objective
Design Standards as they are being formulated. The
Program will refine Task 2 of the Scope of Work as
needed to ensure that approaches and formats used
will be most effective for the Los Gatos community;
that the community has ample opportunity to express
its values and priorities for residential design; and, that, ultimately, the community has ownership of the process.

B. Focus Group Meetings (2). The consulting team will
hold two virtual small-group (up to four individuals per group) meetings with key stakeholders. Stakeholders,
to be identified and contacted by Town staff, are
anticipated to include local designers/architects,
developers, neighborhoods representatives, residents
of mixed-use or multi-family areas of Los Gatos, real
estate professionals, or other interested code users.

The goals of the meetings are to identify important
issues and constraints to residential design; hear the
group members’ design preferences and priorities;

Page 126 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
and understand the group members’ views on the
feasibility and marketability of various design features and standards.

The consulting team will prepare an introductory
presentation, identify discussion topics, and lead the
discussion. Following the meetings, the consulting team will summarize the feedback collected and identify ways to incorporate feedback into the standards.

C. Community Workshop. The consulting team will
design and facilitate an in-person interactive community workshop prior to drafting of the Administrative Draft
Standards. The workshop will:
• Introduce the project to the community. The
workshop will begin with a presentation on the
project background, recent State housing legislation,
and Town policy goals and standards. The
presentation will describe the advantages of ODS for
small towns like Los Gatos and underscore the role
of community members in developing them. The
community will also gain the vocabulary needed to
provide impactful feedback once the draft standards
are ready for public review.
• Solicit input from the community. Following the
presentation, the workshop will provide activities for
community members to offer ideas and priorities
and shape the emerging standards. Activities may
include but are not limited to live visual preference
surveys, interactive stations with presentation
boards, and small-group facilitated discussions
with tabletop materials. While the format will be
developed in coordination with Town staff, the
interactive portion of the workshop will be designed
to prompt community members to:
– Identify and discuss key elements that contribute to
Los Gatos’ neighborhood character.
– Visualize and articulate priorities for a range of
building and site design elements with a focus
on architectural style, building height transitions
between different residential densities and
districts, and details of building design.
– Ask questions about and lend input into the
emerging standards to ensure that the Project is
truly a community-led effort.

After the workshop, the consulting team will summarize
the feedback collected from all participants and identify ideas to be incorporated into the Updated/Additional
Objective Design Standards.

Task 3: Administrative Draft Updated/Additional
Objective Design Standards
A. Working Meetings with Town Staff (2). The
consulting team will participate in two one-hour working meetings with Town staff during the development of
the Administrative Draft. LWC will provide a summary
memo for each meeting.

B. Administrative Draft Updated/Additional
Objective Design Standards. The consulting team will
prepare the Administrative Draft Updated/Additional
Objective Design Standards to satisfy the State’s
requirements in accordance with SB330 as well as the
community’s design priorities. While the scope and
nature of the amendments will be determined through
Tasks 1 and 2, the consulting team anticipates the
Standards will include the following:
• Site Standards. Edits and additions to existing
standards to support high-quality site design
of small-scale multi-family development types,
including common and private open space, bicycle
parking, vehicular parking, landscaping.
• Building Standards. Edits and additions to existing
standards to require high-quality building design
that demonstrates the Los Gatos character. This
includes edits and additions to existing standards
for massing and scale; parking structure design; roof
design; façade design and articulation, and other
design elements. In developing this material, the
consultant team will focus on:
– High-quality building design – Building design (form, massing, materials, and details) that is high in
quality and that reflects the Town’s character,
detailed in an objective manner.
– Architectural style – Styles that are typical of the
Town, both within and outside of the historic
Downtown, and the hallmarks of each style,
described as objective features.
– Height transitions – Strategies for appropriate
massing transitions between different zones and
residential densities, and how such transitions
may impact solar access.
• Anticipating Density Bonus. Edits and additions
to the standards to ensure that key community
priorities are preserved when concessions are
granted to density bonus projects.

Page 127 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
• Updated and new graphics/illustrations. Updated
and new figures and illustrations that accurately
reflect the scale and character of Los Gatos and
that represent the range of forms and scales of
residential and residential mixed-use development
in the Town and that can be used to clearly illustrate
the standards. The graphics will be developed using
a combination of SketchUp and Adobe Illustrator.
• Implementation. Edits and additions to existing
checklist review process to ensure application of
the standards is predictable, clear, and easy to
follow. The consulting team will also identify places
elsewhere in the Town’s regulatory framework that
may need to be updated for consistency with the
Updated/Additional Objective Design Standards and
to ensure predictable and streamlined ministerial
review.

Task 4: Public Review Updated/Additional
Objective Design Standards
A. Working Meetings with Town Staff (2). The
consulting team will participate in two one-hour working meetings with Town staff during the development of the
Public Review Draft. LWC will provide a summary memo
for each meeting.

B. Public Review Draft Objective Design Standards.

The consulting team will prepare a Public Review
Draft based on a single set of consolidated, nonconflicting comments from the Town staff review of the Administrative Draft.

Task 5: Review and Adoption
A. Planning Commission Public Hearing. LWC will
prepare materials/presentations for, and present at
one in-person Planning Commission public hearing to
support adoption of the Updated/Additional Objective
Design Standards.

B. Town Council Public Hearing. LWC will prepare
materials/presentations for, and present at one inperson Town Council public hearing to support adoption of the Updated/Additional Objective Design Standards.

C. Final Objective Design Standards. Based on the
Town Council’s final adoption and final text changes
provided by Town staff, LWC will prepare, and provide
in Word and PDF, the final Objective Design Standards.

Optional Tasks
A. Additional Focus Group Meetings. The consulting
team will hold additional focus group meetings similar
in format to those described in Task 2B, to be held at any point in the process. Discussion topics will be developed in coordination with Town Staff.

B. Educational Story Map/Survey. Using ArcGIS
Online, the UPP team will develop a Story Map that
provides an overview of objective design standards,
showcases existing and proposed multi-family and
mixed-use residential development in the Town, and
collects feedback from users. UPP will analyze this
feedback and work with LWC to incorporate it into the
draft objective design standards.

C. Test Site Feasibility Analysis/Proforma. LWC will
prepare a financial feasibility analysis for selected sites or building prototypes identified in the ODS drafting
process. The goal is to ensure that development
standards result in economically feasible conditions that will allow for projects to be developed. This analysis will also establish that the ODS do not serve as a constraint on housing production. LWC will develop a financial
model (static developer-side pro forma) based on the
proposed standards. The definition of potential building envelopes and development standards can be prepared
concurrently to establish the economic feasibility of the proposed standards as they are being formulated.

D. Community Open House on the Public Review
Draft. The consulting team will hold an in-person Open
House to present the Public Review Draft Updated/
Additional Objective Design Standards to the community
and gather the community’s feedback and input. The
input gathered from the Open House will be reflected in the subsequent draft of the design standards.

E. Planning Commission/Town Council Study
Session. LWC will prepare materials/presentations for,
and present at a Planning Commission or Town Council
study session on the Public Review Draft updated/
Additional Objective Design Standards.

F. Additional Planning Commission/Town Council
Hearing. LWC will prepare materials/presentations
for, and present at a Planning Commission and Town
Council Hearing study session on the Public Review
Draft Updated/Additional Objective Design Standards.

Page 128 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Assumptions
This proposal is based on the following assumptions:

1. All meetings and calls will be conducted using an online video conferencing platform unless specified as inperson.

2. All deliverables, except for presentation materials
required for the public workshop and open house, will
be provided in electronic format.

3. Town staff will be responsible for the preparation
and publishing of all required public hearing notices,
property owner notification, newspaper notices,
agendas and staff reports for public hearings, and
translations or interpretation services.

4. Town staff will provide comments on draft materials
as a single set of non-conflicting and actionable
comments. The Town’s comments will include those
from the Town Attorney as appropriate as determined
Town staff. Town Attorney comments will be compiled
with Town staff comments when provided.

5. Town staff will prepare staff reports, resolutions, and notices for the Planning Commission and Town Council
meetings and hearings.

6. The Project involves no CEQA review, documentation,
or noticing.

The proposal acknowledges laws and statutes enacted at the time of its writing. The parties will agree on amendments to the scope of services that become necessary if any changes occur to applicable rulings and obligations that were
unexpected at the time of the execution of this proposal.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS| 11 LWC prepares for a community workshop on the Hayward
Downtown Specific Plan.

LWC staff leads a visual preference exercise at a Livermore General Plan Amendments community event.

LWC staff leads virtual workshops using a range
of interactive tools such as break-out discussion
rooms, and live polling, and virtual white boards.
slide 27
Design Element Zone C Zone D
Shared garage (podium or underground) OR
above-ground “wrapped” structure
Tuck-under individually secured
garages OR shared garage (podium or
underground)
Parking Design
Driveway Width Max. 20 ft in width Max. 24 ft in width
Screened from view from r-o-w by:
• Regular punched openings designed to
resemble windows of habitable spaces; or
• Trellis/living wall surfaces.

Structured parking levels may not
directly face the right-of-way. Parking Visibility
Residential parking shall be separated from
non-residential parking through a controlled
fence, gate or other barrier.

Parking Separation -
Max. 12 ft in width Max. 12 ft in width; Min. 10 ft from back of sidewalk
Shared Garages/
Garage Doors
Site Design Flip Chart Notes
Where is this doc located? Let's make it easier to
find.

Make ppt available on website, too.

Front yard setback -- let's make it more urban,
remove front setback
(Models don't show front setbacks - at prop line)
Step backs - great! Make new devt less imposing.

Height and adjacencies to single family residential in
Zone D
Prices and rental ratse in feasibility test and not
accurate -- costs min $350/sqft to build, same for
pkg (approx $400/sq ft)

Page 129 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

LWC was founded in 2006 and has
grown to a staff of 21 urban planning
professionals and support staff with
offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco,
and San Luis Obispo. LWC specializes in assessing,
updating, and modernizing zoning codes aimed at
promoting pedestrian and transit-oriented communities,
and facilitating sustainable, vibrant places to live, work, and play. The LWC team addresses each engagement
with a deep understanding of zoning principles and
best practices, strong project management, writing, and graphics production.

Core Services. Since 2006, LWC has been dedicated
to working with California cities to assure compliance
with State Housing Law and consistency and clarity of
zoning codes. This is a target project for LWC. Our core services include:
• Zoning Ordinances, Development Codes, FormBased Codes, and Design Standards and Guidelines • Long-Range Planning, Specific Plans, TOD Plans, and
Corridor Plans
• Housing Elements and Affordable Housing Policy
• Financial Feasibility, Market Analyses, and
Revitalization Strategies
Close Communication and Data-Driven
Management. Our approach relies on close
collaboration with clients through regularly scheduled
calls and meetings, regular progress reports, and fast
and thorough turnaround on all document review
and communication. Our operations are supported by
BigTime, a performance management software LWC
employs to track project progress by task and team
member in real time. This enables the LWC team to
anticipate and adjust for issues before they occur and
keep the project on schedule and on budget.

Targeted Experience. LWC has led over 100 zoning
code engagements and 15 successful Housing Element
Updates in this 6th Cycle. LWC has developed produced
Objective Design Standards and prepared related
Zoning Amendments for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Beaumont (Riverside County)
• City of Long Beach (Los Angeles County)
• City of Los Altos (Santa Clara County)
• Marin County
• City of Millbrae (San Mateo County)
• City of Piedmont (Alameda County)
• Town of Portola Valley (San Mateo County)
• City of Rancho Cucamonga (San Bernardino County)
• City of Saratoga (Santa Clara County)
• City of Seal Beach (Orange County)
• City of South San Francisco (San Mateo County)
• City of Woodland (Yolo County)

EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE

Page 130 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 13 Equity. Ensures that the benefits and burdens of the new code are shared across the community, expand opportunities for affordable housing and affordable commercial space, and support a diversity of businesses.

Viability. Fosters development that supports housing, employment growth, vibrant commercial centers and business districts while considering market forces, economic feasibility and fiscal performance.

Quality. Assures standard of excellence that retains value, is long lasting, and responds to context and character of neighbor-hoods, corridors, and districts.

Context. Responds and enhances to the unique character of neighborhoods, corridors, centers, and districts.

Predictability. Offers a high degree of control and assures alignment with expectations of development outcomes for the City, property owners, businesses, and the development community.

Flexibility. Able to accommodate reasonable adjustments to assure positive outcomes and community compatibility over time.

Clarity. Be easy to understand for community members, developers, and City officials and staff, and enable consistent interpretation at the planning counter.

As a firm, we are dedicated to the following principles on all of our engagements:

LWC tested out the objective design standards on a key
Housing Element opportunity site in Piedmont, CA. The Redwood City Residential Design Guide provides guidance on a range of architectural elements.

Landscaping is an integral part of
the neighborhood streetscape.

Page 131 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 14 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

CITY OF LOS ALTOS
Objective Design Standards for Multi-family and Residential Mixed Use Development Micro-scale analysis of a downtown residential district LWC was hired by the City of Los
Altos to develop design standards
for the City’s Zoning Code to be
compliant and consistent with
State laws SB2, SB35, SB330, and
AB1485, and facilitate the production
of safe, attractive and diverse
housing.

LWC implemented the project with
an outreach campaign grounded in
LQWHUYLHZVZLWK&LW\VWDႇ&LW\&RXQFLO
members, Planning Commissioners,
developers, architects, and property
and business owners. Outreach also
included a series of Joint Planning
&RPPLVVLRQ&LW\&RXQFLO6WXG\
Sessions.

Armed with feedback from the
community, LWC conducted a
thorough review and evaluation
of existing standards, criteria,
and guidelines for multifamily and
residential mixed-use development,
focusing on existing subjective design
standards. LWC also conducted a
micro-scale analysis of built form in
the key areas as well as lot testing on
sample sites.
%DVHGRQWKH¿QGLQJVRIWKHDQDO\VLV
and input from City leadership,
LWC drafted and illustrated a set
of objective design standards for
all 11 zoning districts that support
multi-family or residential mixed-use
development. The standards ensure
that criteria for approval are clear,
objective, and lead to predictable
KLJKTXDOLW\UHVXOWVWKDWUHÀHFWWKH
City’s unique character.

The City Council adopted the
Objective Design Standards in
September of 2021.

STATUS:

Adopted September 2021
TIMEFRAME:

May 2020 – September 2021
BUDGET:
$341,750
REFERENCE:

Guido F. Persicone, MUP, AICP
Planning Services Director
City of Los Altos (Former)
Community Development Director
(Current)
City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Ave.

Marina, CA 93933
(831) 884-1281
[email protected]
PARTNERS:

Opticos Design, Inc.

W-Trans
LWC also updated the Los Altos 6th
Cycle Housing Element, which was
adopted by City Council on January
DQGFHUWL¿HGE\WKH+&'LQ
September 2023.

Page 132 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 15 983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM LWC was hired by the City of Millbrae
to develop objective residential design
standards that ensure consistency and
compliance with State laws including SB
330, SB 6, AB 2011, and laws related to
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The
project’s goals are to establish standards
for the design of single-family residential
development, duplexes, triplexes,
ADUs, multi-family, and mixed-use
developments; and to introduce a new
residential design review process aimed
at facilitating residential permitting.

To ensure the community’s voice is
evident in the updated Zoning Code,
/:&KDVZRUNHGFORVHO\ZLWK&LW\VWDႇ
to facilitate study sessions with the City
Council, Planning Commission, and
Community Enhancement Advisory
Committee; a Community Workshop;
a Community Open House; an online
Community Survey; and social media
posts to gather community input on
design preferences and priorities. LWC
has also designed and hosts a project
website (www.millbraeresidentialdesign.
org).

Based on a thorough review and
analysis of existing residential design,
a review of existing policies and
standards, and input from the community
and decision-making bodies, LWC is
drafting design standards that are clear,
visually engaging, user-friendly, and
will lead to predictable high-quality and
context-sensitive design.

Anticipated adoption of the Citywide
Objective Design Standards and Zoning
Code Amendments is November 2025.

CITY OF MILLBRAE
Citywide Objective Design Standards and Zoning Code Amendments STATUS
Anticipated adoption
November 2025

TIMEFRAME
December 2023 –
November 2025
BUDGET
$513,202
REFERENCE:

Roscoe Mata
Planning Manager
City of Millbrae
621 Magnolia Avenue
Millbrae, CA 94030
(650) 259-2416
[email protected]

Page 133 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
16 983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM ,QWKH&LW\RI3LHGPRQWKLUHG
/:&WRFUHDWH2EMHFWLYH'HVLJQ
Standards for mixed-use and multiIDPLO\GHYHORSPHQWFRQGXFWVLWHDQG IHDVLELOLW\WHVWLQJGHYHORSVWUDWHJLHVWR
DLGWKH&LW\LQDႈUPDWLYHO\IXUWKHULQJ
IDLUKRXVLQJFRQVLVWHQWZLWK$%
and provide incentives for ADUs.
7KHSURMHFWDLPHGDWDFFHOHUDWLQJ
KRXVLQJSURGXFWLRQE\VWUHDPOLQLQJ
the development review process while
DVVXULQJWKHFRPPXQLW\¶VVXSSRUWIRU
WKHGHVLJQTXDOLW\DQGSODFHPHQWRI
new units.

Piedmont values its beautiful
QHLJKERUKRRGVJHQHURXVSDUNVSDFH
and small-town charm. The community
LVDOVRDZDUHRILWVXQLTXHFRQVWUDLQWV

DOPRVWSHUFHQWRI3LHGPRQWLV
GHVLJQDWHGIRUVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDO
DQGRQO\SHUFHQWIRUPXOWLIDPLO\
residential. Vacant land accounts for
less than two percent of the land area.

A critical feature of the project is
RXWUHDFKHGXFDWLRQDQGFRPPXQLW\
SDUWLFLSDWLRQ$VVXFK/:&OHGD
UREXVWFRPPXQLW\HQJDJHPHQWHႇRUW
ZKLFKIHDWXUHGVWDNHKROGHULQWHUYLHZV
FRPPXQLW\ZRUNVKRSWZRZRUNVKRSV
ZLWKWKH+RXVLQJ$GYLVRU\&RPPLWWHH
DQGDFRPPXQLW\ZLGH)DLU+RXVLQJ
6XUYH\WKDWJDUQHUHGRYHU
responses.
/:&ZRUNHGFORVHO\ZLWK&LW\VWDႇ
and the community to assess the
&LW\¶VH[LVWLQJVXEMHFWLYHJXLGHOLQHV
DQDO\]HKRXVLQJRSSRUWXQLW\VLWHVWHVW
WKHH[LVWLQJGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGV
RQWZRGHYHORSPHQWVLWHVDQGHQVXUH
WKHFRPPXQLW\¶VGHVLJQSUHIHUHQFHV
DUHUHÀHFWHGLQWKHQHZGHYHORSPHQW
standards.
/:&DOVRFRQGXFWHGD¿QDQFLDO
feasibility analysis for the two
GHYHORSPHQWVLWHVXVLQJ'PRGHOV
and proforma analysis. LWC assured
WKH2'6ZRXOGEH¿QDQFLDOO\IHDVLEOH
and would lead to outcomes supported
by the community.

The standards were adopted by City
&RXQFLOLQ6HSWHPEHU
STATUS:
$GRSWHG6HSWHPEHU
TIMEFRAME:
6HSWHPEHU±
6HSWHPEHU
BUDGET:

REFERENCE:
.HYLQ-DFNVRQ$,&3
3ODQQLQJ %XLOGLQJ'LUHFWRU
City of Piedmont
9LVWD$YHQXH
3LHGPRQW&$

[email protected]
PARTNERS:

Open Scope Studio
Plan to Place

CITY OF PIEDMONT
Multifamily and Mixed Use Objective Design Standards, Proformas, and Prototype Plans and Incentives for Accessory Dwelling Units LWC also updated the Piedmont 6th
Cycle Housing Element. The Housing
Element was adopted by City Council
RQ0DUFKDQGZDVFHUWL¿HG
by the HCD in October 2023.

Page 134 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | LISAWISECONSULTING.COM TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 17 LWC was hired by Redwood City
WRFUHDWHWKH&LW\¶V¿UVW5HVLGHQWLDO
'HVLJQ*XLGH7KH&LW\ZLGH
5HVLGHQWLDO'HVLJQ*XLGHZDV
LQLWLDWHGLQ
WRDGGUHVVFRQFHUQV
UHJDUGLQJGHVLJQPDVVLQJVFDOHDQG
SURSRUWLRQVRIVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPHVLQ
UHODWLRQWRQHLJKERUKRRGFRQWH[W
7KH*XLGHDSSOLHVWRDOOUHVLGHQWLDO
GHVLJQLQWKHFLW\ZLWKSDUWLFXODU
HPSKDVLVRQVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPHV
7KH*XLGHDOVRSURYLGHVFULWHULDIRU
the evaluation of projects that require
HLWKHUVWDႇOHYHORUKHDULQJOHYHO
review. These include second-story
DGGLWLRQVPRGL¿FDWLRQVWRDVHFRQG
VWRU\QHZVLQJOHIDPLO\WZRVWRU\

VWUXFWXUHV
VLQJOHIDPLO\SURMHFWVWKDW
H[FHHGVTXDUHIHHWRUDQ)$5RI

DQGDGGLWLRQVWRKRPHVRQORWV
ZLWKDQDYHUDJHVORSHRISHUFHQWRU
more.
/:&ZRUNHGFORVHO\ZLWK&LW\VWDႇ
RQDQH[WHQVLYHRXWUHDFKSURJUDP
to determine the community’s
SUHIHUHQFHVSULRULWLHVDQGFRQFHUQV
DERXWVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDO
GHVLJQ7KHFRPPXQLW\RXWUHDFK
SURFHVVLQFOXGHGDSURMHFWZHEVLWH
)$4VKHHWSURMHFWSRVWFDUGVLQLWLDO
LQIRUPDWLRQJDWKHULQJVHVVLRQVZLWK
NH\VWDNHKROGHUVD3LQWHUHVWSDJH
LQWHUDFWLYH:DONVKRSVVSHFL¿FWR
HDFK5HGZRRG&LW\QHLJKERUKRRGWZR
RQOLQHVXUYH\VDQ2SHQ+RXVHWZR
&RPPXQLW\:RUNVKRSVDQGDWDEOHDW
a community Farmers’ Market.
,QDGGLWLRQWRWKH'HVLJQ*XLGHV
/:&UHFRPPHQGHG=RQLQJ&RGH
DPHQGPHQWVLQFOXGLQJPRGL¿FDWLRQV
WRVLQJOHIDPLO\GHYHORSPHQW
VWDQGDUGV=RQLQJ$GPLQLVWUDWRU3HUPLW
¿QGLQJVDQGSURFHGXUDOFKDQJHVIRU
SURMHFWQRWLFLQJDQGDSSURYDO
7KHSDVVDJHRI6%GXULQJWKH
project led the City to approve the
'HVLJQ*XLGHIRUD\HDUSLORW
SURJUDPDIWHUZKLFKWLPHWKH&LW\
would determine how to update them
as objective standards.

STATUS:
$SSURYHG-XO\
TIMEFRAME:
-XQH
-XO\
BUDGET:

REFERENCE:

William Chui
Associate Planner
City of Redwood City
0LGGOH¿HOG5RDG
5HGZRRG&LW\&$

[email protected]

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY
Citywide Residential Design Guide

Page 135 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
18 983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

CITY OF SARATOGA
Objective Design Standards
STATUS:

Adopted
TIMEFRAME:
6HSWHPEHU±
2FWREHU
BUDGET:

REFERENCE:

Christopher Riordan
Senior Planner
&LW\RI6DUDWRJD
)UXLWYDOH$YHQXH
6DUDWRJD&$

[email protected]
7KH&LW\RI6DUDWRJDKLUHG/:&WR
LPSOHPHQWWKHLUWK&\FOH+RXVLQJ
(OHPHQWGHYHORS2EMHFWLYH'HVLJQ
6WDQGDUGVDQGDFKLHYHWKH&LW\¶VJRDOV
of compliance with state law while
PDLQWDLQLQJVPDOOWRZQFKDUDFWHUDQGD
KLJKTXDOLW\RIOLIHIRULWVUHVLGHQWV
LWC initiated the project with a review of
UHFHQWGHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWVHYDOXDWLRQ
RIFRQWH[WDQGGHVLJQFKDUDFWHULVWLFV
RIWKHSURSRVHGKRXVLQJRSSRUWXQLW\
areas as well as policy direction from
WKH*HQHUDO3ODQJXLGDQFHDQGSROLF\
GLUHFWLRQIURP6SHFL¿F3ODQVDQG'HVLJQ
*XLGHOLQHV
8VLQJ'PRGHOLQJVRIWZDUH/:&WHVWHG
the proposed standards for the new
UHVLGHQWLDOPL[HGXVH]RQHVRQVSHFL¿F
KRXVLQJRSSRUWXQLW\VLWHVWRFRQ¿UPWKDW
the standards would be feasible and
PHHW&LW\JRDOV
%DVHGRQWKH¿QGLQJVRIWKHDQDO\VLV
DQGLQSXWIURPPHHWLQJVZLWK&LW\
VWDႇ/:&GUDIWHGDQGLOOXVWUDWHGQHZ
2EMHFWLYH'HVLJQ6WDQGDUGVIRUWKH
RSSRUWXQLW\VLWHVWREHUH]RQHGWR
support multi-family or residential mixeduse development.

The new standards satisfy the State’s
UHTXLUHPHQWVIRU2EMHFWLYH'HVLJQ
6WDQGDUGVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK6%
LWC also provided direction on
FRUUHVSRQGLQJXSGDWHVWRWKH=RQLQJ
Code.
7KH2EMHFWLYH'HVLJQ6WDQGDUGVZHUH
adopted by the City Council in October

8SSHU6WRU\6WHS%DFN080''LVWULFW

8SSHU6WRU\)URQW6WHS%DFN089+''LVWULFW

Page 136 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS| 19 Urban Planning
Partners, Inc.

Urban Planning Partners (UPP) is
a land use planning firm that was
established in 2009. We are a small firm located in
Downtown Oakland and 100-percent woman-owned.

The firm is led by Lynette Dias, UPP’s Founder and
President. Lynette has over 30 years of urban and
environmental planning experience. She began her
career in the public sector in northern and southern
California cities, and later transitioned into consulting, where she spent the majority of her career working
for public agencies and private developers throughout
California.

Our Mission and Values
Our mission is to help create better places in partnership with our clients and the communities in which we work.

Our core values are:
• We care. We have called the Bay Area home since
our founding and love playing a part in shaping some
of our favorite places. We take on projects that stir
something in us, and it shows.
• We collaborate. Projects are stronger when the
development process is collaborative. Whether it’s
working with one another, our subconsultants, or our
clients, we believe in joining forces.
• We reach. The potential for what we can do, not
relying on what we’ve always done, is what motivates
us. Reaching up and preaching out keeps our work
innovative, our team engaged, and our approach
inclusive.
• We are real. We pride ourselves on telling it like it is. Our clients can count on us for honest, practical
guidance.

Our key services include planning policy, development
services, community engagement, environmental
review, contract planning, and grant writing. Trust,
objectivity, and insight are the foundations of our work.

Our dedication, strong communication skills, and diverse range of experience enable successful partnerships
with our clients. We collaborate with our clients and
the communities in which we work to achieve approval
and implementation of policies and projects that better urban environments.

Community Engagement
At UPP, we believe that objective design standards
function best when they are developed in collaboration
with community members who know their community
best and key stakeholders who have a detailed
understanding of the development process.

UPP has lead outreach and engagement efforts related
to objective design standards in several communities
including Santa Cruz, Foster City, and San Jose. Our
experience working on these projects has taught us
the importance of getting to know the communities we
serve, taking part in active listening, being transparent, and providing ample opportunities for the community
to learn about the project and provide input.

In Santa Cruz, the UPP team led a robust outreach
campaign to develop standards that represented the
community. UPP collected feedback from a diverse
group of community members and stakeholders via an
online survey, tabling events, community workshops,
focus group meetings, and a planning commission
study session. UPP used this feedback to draft objective design standards that balance a variety of needs and
perspectives. Because the UPP team worked with the
community to develop objective design standards, the
standards earned broad support and were unanimously
adopted by the City Council.

In Foster City, UPP used a different approach to
encourage community ownership of objective
development standards. Here, UPP designed a “Data
Walk” activity that guided community members through
the design of ten housing projects in Foster City and
asked them to provide feedback on their experience
of those projects. UPP worked to identify common
themes among the feedback collected, including which
features and characteristics were most positively/
negatively perceived. Based on our findings, our team
drafted objective design standards that were most likely to be positively perceived while still remaining feasible, satisfying legal requirements, and aligning with housing development targets.

Page 137 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

RELATED PROJECT EXAMPLES AND REFERENCES

SANTA CRUZ MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ
UPP worked with the City of Santa Cruz to develop
objective development standards for multi-family
development per State laws SB 35 and the Housing
Accountability Act. Given previous misinformation and
community resistance to multi-family development, the
UPP team (in partnership with InterEthnica) developed
and carried out an equity-focused engagement approach
to reach communities not typically involved with the
planning process including the Latinx community, lowand moderate-income households, and university students. Through targeted engagement and candid
discussions with stakeholders, the team facilitated
meaningful dialogue that shaped development standards
that are economically feasible for developers and
representative of community priorities and values.

The team presented the community engagement strategy
to the Planning Commission, where they heard
unanimous support. In addition to community engagement, the objective standards are informed by robust analysis. UPP led a team of technical subconsultants with economic, transportation, and urban design expertise to ensure the development standards are feasible. UPP, with help from Kristen Hall City Design and Strategic Economics, completed test fits and proforma analyses to identify barriers to development that could be addressed with the objective development standards. The standards were approved by the Santa Cruz City Council on November 15, 2022. Following adoption of the Objective Development Standards, UPP assisted the City in developing an Objective Development Checklist for both applicant and internal use to implement the standards.

Client Contact
Sarah Neuse, Senior Planner – Advanced Planning
City of Santa Cruz
831.420.5092
[email protected]

Page 138 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 21

FOSTER CITY OBJECTIVE MULTI-FAMILY AND MIXED-USE DESIGN STANDARDS

CITY OF FOSTER CITY
Objective design standards often require
the use of industry best practices and
technical terms to translate personal
experiences of a place (e.g., “community
character”) into quantifiable measures.

As a result, these standards can be
challenging for community members and
decisions-makers to envision – or for
planning professionals to articulate.

UPP and Van Meter Williams Pollack
teamed up to work with Foster City to
develop objective design standards for
multi-family and mixed-use
developments. The standards address site development, buildings, and landscape and Foster City’s unique waterfront setting.

To help frame this conversation, UPP designed a “Data Walk” activity that guided community members through the design of ten housing projects in Foster City and asked them to provide feedback on their experience of those projects. Stakeholders could participate physically (by scanning QR codes at each location) or digitally (by interactive map), at their own pace. Each stop included a short video explaining key design features and prompting participants with open-ended questions. Participants could then send texts, take a survey, or fill out a physical handout to respond to the questions. The project included preparing objective design standards in a new chapter of the City’s zoning regulations, related zoning regulation amendments in numerous other chapters, checklist for developers, and a users’ guide with additional photos and graphics to explain the standards.

Client Contact
Sofia Mangalam, Community Development Director
City of Foster City
650.286.3239
[email protected]

Page 139 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
22 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC.

IRVINGTON BART STATION SITE PLAN, STATION AREA PLAN, AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

BART AND THE CITY OF FREMONT
UPP led a team of consultants on the
development of a Station Site Plan and Station
Area Plan for the new Irvington BART Station.

Working with a large team and two different
clients on a controversial project required a
proactive project management approach and
robust community outreach.

Leading the development of the Station Area
Plan, UPP worked with Urban Field Studio to
guide future development in the area
surrounding Irvington Station and stitch the
new station into the existing community. We prioritized crafting a Station Area Plan that is useful and easily readable for planners and developers and that includes objective development standards.

The outreach strategy for Irvington BART Project included message development, targeted stakeholder engagement, and public outreach. Targeted stakeholder outreach included focus groups with the Irvington Business Association, Washington Township Historical Society, and property owners and developers with property interests near the station. Involving these groups early in the planning process in a transparent and collaborative manner allowed the project team to gain a diverse group of supportive stakeholders. UPP also organized and led classroom presentations to approximately 150 students at Irvington High School, spoke to over 100 people while tabling at the Irvington Farmer’s Market, developed multiple online surveys, and led large community workshops that attracted over 100 participants.

UPP also led the streamlined environmental review process to clear the Irvington Station which consisted of an addendum to the 1991 Warm Springs BART Extension EIR and 2003 Warm Springs Extension Supplemental EIR. Completion of this project has achieved the City of Fremont’s longstanding vision of a transit-oriented, active area, strategically integrated with the future Irvington BART Station; consistent with the City’s 2011 General Plan and Irvington Community Plan goals.

Client Contact
Kristie Wheeler, Interim Assistant Community Development Director (former Fremont Planning Manager)
City of Dublin
925.833.6610
[email protected]

Page 140 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PERSONNEL
LWC’s approach for the Objective Design Standards
Project will rely on our team’s expertise in California Housing Law, best practices for Zoning Code audits and
updates, and our experience on similar projects. The
LWC Team assigned to this Project brings decades of
relevant practice and understanding:

Lisa Wise, AICP (Principal) has over 30 years of
professional Project Management experience leading
housing element updates in the 4th, 5th and 6th cycles
as well as zoning code audits and updates throughout
California and the U.S. as well as large-scale code
engagements in the Middle East.

David Bergman (Director) brings over 25 years of
experience in California Housing law and zoning
regulation. David was the LWC Project Manager for 6th
Cycle Housing Element Updates, Inclusionary Housing
Ordinances and Density Bonus programs in Long
Beach, Alameda County and Novato and has served
as the Director of Planning and Building in the City of South Pasadena.

Monica Szydlik, AICP (Project Manager) brings over
18 years of project management, zoning code and
community design experience. Monica holds a Master’s
degree in architecture and has led objective design
standards and design guidelines projects in Piedmont,
Los Altos, Woodland, South San Francisco, Saratoga,
Portola Valley, Redwood City, and Seal Beach.

Stefano Richichi (Senior Associate) has over nine years of zoning code and community development experience.

He supports the LWC team in comprehensive code
review, assessment, and strategies to ensure more userfriendly, streamlined, modern development regulations that implement the community’s vision.

Caroline Chen (Associate) brings nearly four years of
graphics, design and long-range planning experience
and will support the team with comprehensive research
and developing drafts and editing deliverables.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. The UPP team bring extensive expertise in community development, and land use and policy planning. The
UPP Team assigned to this Project brings the following
qualifications and experience:

Curtis Banks, AICP (Principal-in-Charge) has over
30 years of experience in planning and community
development, including affordable housing, building,
and code enforcement. Curtis has managed a wide
variety of residential and non-residential projects,
coordinating all facets of the project from the beginning of the planning and environmental review process
through construction. Curtis has spent his entire career working for communities in Santa Clara and San Mateo
counties (including as consultant to Los Gatos). Curtis is currently overseeing projects in Saratoga and Newark.

Carla Violet (Project Manager) has over 10 years of
experience managing land use and policy planning,
environmental review, and community engagement
projects customized to address specific project
objectives, anticipated challenges and opportunities,
and community concerns. She is skilled at effectively
evolving community engagement strategies to ensure
responsiveness to project issues that arise during
the planning process and to ensure an appropriately
representative cross-section of the community and/
or stakeholders are engaged. Carla serves as the East
Bay Community Relationship Manager for the Link 21
Program which aims to expand BART and other rail
systems by adding another transbay crossing between
Oakland and San Francisco.

Grant Sles (Project Planner) has nearly five years of
experience in urban planning and has worked in both
the public and private sector. His main areas of expertise are housing policy, community engagement, climate
resilience, and environmental justice. He has played a
key role in developing general plan elements and specific plans throughout the West Coast and implemented
affordable housing programs at the County of Ventura.

Urban Planning Partners, Inc.

Page 141 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

LISA WISE, AICP
President, CEO
As a certified planner and public accountant, Lisa has over 30 years of professional experience in housing policy, land use regulation, real estate finance, and the management of complex projects. Lisa is a part-time lecturer at the California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo focusing on courses in housing and real estate finance.

Lisa has been directly responsible for a breadth of large-scale projects aimed at accelerating housing production and complying with State housing law. These include 35 housing elements in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Cycles as well as Fair Housing Assessments, Inclusionary Housing Ordinances, Objective Design Standards, and Density Bonus Programs. She has also overseen over 23 master and specific plans, 80 zoning coed audits and updates and 35 economic and financial feasibility engagements.

Select Relevant Project Experience:
• Arroyo Grande, CA | Housing Element Update, 4th and 5th Cycle • Austin, TX I Citywide Code Update
• Atascadero, CA | Affordable Housing Short Sale Policy, Housing Element Implementation and Housing Element 4th and 5th Cycle
• Benicia, CA | Housing Element Update, 4th and 5th Cycle • Columbus, OH, Code Assessment and Code and Zoning Map Update • Flagstaff, AZ | Zoning Ordinance Update
• Grover Beach, CA | Zoning Code Update, West Grand Avenue Masterplan, and 4th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Hayward, CA I Downtown Specific Plan and Code Update
• King City, CA | Housing Element, 4th Cycle
• Livermore, CA | Development Code Update and 5th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Long Beach, CAI 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Long Beach, CA I SB9 Ordinance and ADU Ordinance
• Loomis, CA | Housing Element Update 3rd, 4th and 5th Cycle • Malibu, CA | Zoning Code and Local Implementation Plan Update • Merced, CA | Bellevue Corridor Plan
• Mesa, AZ | Form-Based Code and Regulating Plan
• Petaluma, CA | SMART Rail Station Areas: TOD Master Plan • Pismo Beach, CA | Housing Element, 4th Cycle
• Richmond, CA | Livable Corridors Plan, South Shore Specific Plan, and 4th and 5th Cycle Housing Element Update, Fair Housing Ordinance Evaluation and Update
• Saratoga, CA I Mixed Use Multifamily Objective Design Standards • Tehachapi, CA | Housing Element Update 4th and 5th Cycle • Vallejo, CA | Housing Element Update 5th Cycle
• Woodland, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Woodland, CA I Comprehensive Code Update

PAST WORK EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION

CERTIFICATIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
California Polytechnic State University
Adjunct Faculty | San Luis Obispo, CA | 2002 - Present
Crawford, Multari & Clark Associates
Professional Consultant | San Luis Obispo, CA
2001 – 2006
Governor’s Office of Planning & Research (OPR)
Intern | Sacramento, CA | 1999 – 2000
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Financial Services Manager | New York, NY
1990 – 1999
California Polytechnic State University
Master of City & Regional Planning | San Luis Obispo, CA DePaul University
M.S., Accountancy | Chicago, IL
University of Cincinnati
B.S., Business Administration in Marketing & Finance
American Planning Association (APA)
American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP)
California Planning Foundation
Treasurer, 2019 – Present
Dean’s Leadership Council
California Polytechnic State University, College of
Architecture & Environmental Design, 2018 – Present
Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU)
Paul Crawford Award for Excellence in Planning, 2017
Form-Based Code Institute (FBCI)
Chair, 2015 – 2018 | Treasurer, 2014 – 2015
Certified Public Accountant, 1991 – 1999

Page 142 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

DAVID BERGMAN
Director
With over 25 years of experience, David has focused on housing regulation, financial feasibility analysis, and urban planning projects, with an emphasis on the formation and implementation of local and regional development strategies. He brings an understanding of California Housing Law earned working directly with California cities and counties on the identification and assessment of financing options for affordable housing, student and workforce housing, and inclusionary housing, and strategies for improved jobs/housing balance and anti-displacement programs.

As the Director of Planning for the City of South Pasadena, he oversaw the successful approval of the City’s first density bonus application and adoption of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance that was approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). David successfully led 6th Cycle Housing Element Updates in Long Beach, Novato, and Alameda County among others.

Relevant Project Experience:
• Alameda County, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update • Artesia, CA | Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Analysis and Recommendations • Beverly Hills, CA | Economic Sustainability Plan Update • Citrus Heights, CA | Housing Prototype Testing
• Cypress, CA | Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study
• Folsom, CA | Financial Feasibility Analysis for Residential and Mixed Use • Long Beach, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Long Beach, CA | SB9 and ADU Ordinance
• Lompoc, CA | Housing Market Analysis
• Modesto, CA | Financial Feasibility Analysis for Residential and Mixed Use • Novato, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update, Rezoning Program, and Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
• Portola Valley, CA | Conceptual Site Plans, Zoning Code Amendments, and Objective Design Standards
• Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Economic Development Strategic Plan • San Diego, CA | Barrio Logan Affordable Housing Strategy • San Fernando, CA | Workforce Housing Analysis
• San Gabriel, CA | Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
• Santa Maria, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update and Market Analysis • Santa Rosa, CA | Jobs Housing Balance Study
• Seal Beach, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• St. Helena, CA | Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
• Sun Cal, Anaheim, CA | Inclusionary Housing Strategy, Palatium Triangle • Tehachapi, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Woodland, CA | Financial Feasibility Analysis for Residential and Mixed Use

PAST WORK EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION

ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
Metropolitan Research and Economics
Principal, Director, and Owner | Santa Monica, CA
2009 - 2020
City of South Pasadena, CA
Director, Planning and Building
2018 - 2019
City of Santa Cruz, CA
Manager of Special Projects, Economic Development
2014 - 2017
Economics Research Associates
Principal | Los Angeles, CA
1996 - 2009
University of California
M. of Planning Geography | Los Angeles, CA
University of Wisconsin
B.A., Geography and Classical History | Madison, WI
University of Southern California
School of Architecture
2016 – 2019
Southern California Institute of Architecture
2001 – 2016
University of Michigan
School of Architecture
2009 – 2010

Page 143 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

MONICA SZYDLIK, AICP
Senior Associate
Monica brings over 18 years’ experience in planning and urban design to LWC.

She has focused her career on leading specific plans, transit-oriented development plans, streetscape design, design guidelines, form-based development regulations, and zoning code updates. Her skills include managing multidisciplinary teams, meticulous attention to detail, deep understanding of land use regulations, facilitating community outreach, and delivering projects on time and within budget. Monica is an expert in integrating 3-D modeling, diagramming, and photo simulations for more attractive, publishing-quality reports and presentations.

Monica brings a comprehensive approach that combines technical urban planning knowledge, an emphasis on architecture and design, and a focus on feasibility of implementation.

Monica holds a Master of Architecture from the University of Michigan and a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of California, Berkeley.

Relevant Project Experience:
• Avondale, AZ | Avondale City Center Specific Area Plan • Belmont, CA | Belmont Village Specific Plan
• Burbank, CA | Single-Family Neighborhood Compatibility and Design • Honolulu, HI | Downtown and Kalihi Neighborhood TOD Plans • Livermore, CA | Isabel Neighborhood Plan and EIR
• Long Beach, CA | ADU and SB 9 Local Ordinances
• Los Altos, CA | Objective Design Standards
• Piedmont, CA | Mixed-Use and Multi-Family Objective Design Standards, Prototype Plans and Incentives for Accessory Dwelling Units • Portola Valley, CA | Conceptual Site Plans, Zoning Code Amendments, and Objective Design Standards
• Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Form-Based Code
• Redwood City, CA | Hillside Regulations
• Redwood City, CA | Citywide Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines • Saratoga, CA | Objective Design Standards
• San Bruno, CA | Bayhill Specific Plan
• San Diego, CA | Mission Valley Community Plan - Urban Design • San Jose, CA | Santana Row/Valley Fair and Winchester Boulevard Urban Village Master Plans
• San Pablo, CA | San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan
• Santa Cruz County, CA | Accessory Dwelling Unit Guidebooks • Seal Beach, CA | Housing Element Implementation, Objective Design Standards
• South Lake Tahoe | CA, Tahoe Valley Development and Design Standards • South San Francisco, CA | El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan • South San Francisco, CA | Zoning Code Update & Form-Based Code • Woodland, CA | Comprehensive Zoning Code Update

PAST WORK EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION

CERTIFICATIONS, MEMBERSHIPS, AND AWARDS
Dyett & Bhatia Urban and Regional Planners
Senior Associate | Oakland, CA
2006 – 2018
Kirk Miller Affiliates
Architectural Designer | San Francisco, CA
2005 – 2006
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Master of Architecture
University of California, Berkeley
B.A. History
American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP)
2017 – Present
American Planning Association
• California Chapter Award of Excellence, 2018,
Belmont Village Specific Plan
• Hawaii Chapter Honor Award for Urban Design,
2016, Downtown and Kalihi Neighborhood TOD
Plans
• California Northern Section Award of Honor for
Neighborhood Planning, 2012, El Camino Real/
Chestnut Avenue Area Plan
• Arizona Chapter Award, Master Plan Category,
2009, Avondale City Center Specific Area Plan

Page 144 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 706 SOUTH HILL STREET, STE 1100, LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

PAST WORK EXPERIENCE
County of Lassen, CA
Senior Planner
January 2020-August 2021
Associate Planner
April 2017-January 2020
Assistant Planner
May 2015-April 2017
City of Monterey Park, CA
Economic Development Intern
November 2014-April 2015

EDUCATION
Azusa Pacific University
Azusa, CA
Bachelor of Arts, Economics
Concentration: Business
Bachelor of Arts, Philosophy

CERTIFICATIONS & MEMBERSHIPS
American Planning Association (APA)
2021 - Present

STEFANO RICHICHI
Senior Associate
Stefano has eight years of experience focused on housing regulation and programs for establishing objective design standards, density bonus programs, inclusionary housing ordinances, and ADU ordinances. He has a practiced understanding of California housing regulation and effective strategies for legal compliance while honoring a community’s vision for preserving the character of established neighborhoods and enabling attractive, affordable housing choices. Stefano supports the team in conducting site inventories and rezone candidate sites analysis, legal consistency review, workshop facilitation, and project management support.

Stefano’s increasing responsibilities include serving as Deputy Project Manager for 6th Cycle Housing Element Updates in Alameda County, CA and Richmond CA, where he developed housing sites inventories, assessed existing housing policies and programs, and prepared and implemented community outreach aimed at historically disadvantaged and marginalized communities. He also created detailed demographic profiles and analyses of governmental and non-governmental constraints to housing, and works closely with City staff and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in the Housing Element Update review, approval, and certification processes.

Stefano has a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Philosophy from Azusa Pacific University in Azusa, California.

Relevant Project Experience:
• Alameda County, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Beaumont, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update, Objective Design Standards and ADU Ordinance
• Coachella, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Costa Mesa, CA, Short-Term Rental Analysis
• Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Development Authority Saudi Commission, Comprehensive Zoning Code
• Las Vegas, NV, Downtown Form-Based Code
• Lassen County, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update and ADU Ordinance • Lassen County, CA, Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy • Lassen County, CA, Noise Element Update and Ordinance • Los Altos, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Milpitas, CA, Comprehensive Zoning Code Update
• Novato, CA 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Palmdale, CA, Zoning Code Update
• Piedmont, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Pleasanton, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Richmond, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Urban Code
• San Gabriel, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Santa Maria, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Temple City, CA, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

Page 145 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
983 OSOS STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 | 870 MARKET STREET, STE 977, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 | 939 S BROADWAY, STE 611, LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 LISAWISECONSULTING.COM

CAROLINE CHEN
Associate
Caroline brings four years of expertise in communicating how two-dimensional regulations influence the three-dimensional environment of residential neighborhoods, commercial corridors, and mixed-use zones. She is an expert in using the Adobe Creative Suite, SketchUp, AutoCAD, and other design programs to produce infographics, maps, and 3D models that enhance LWC’s Housing Element updates, housing implementation programs, development codes, and long-range plans. Caroline has taken on increasing responsibility, supporting the LWC Team on housing-related engagements in Beaumont, Alameda County, Novato, Piedmont, Saratoga, and Seal Beach.

Caroline’s professional background includes knowledge of the permit application and approval process through her work with San Francisco-based Geddes Ulinskas Architects. She holds a Bachelor of Science in City & Regional Planning and a minor in Landscape Architecture from California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo.

Relevant Project Experience:
• Alameda County, CA | Implementation of the Castro Valley General Plan, 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Beaumont, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update, Objective Design Standards, and ADU Ordinance
• Columbus, OH | Zoning Code Update
• La Quinta, CA | Highway 111 Form-Based Code
• Las Vegas, NV | Downtown Form-Based Code
• Millbrae, CA | Citywide Objective Design Standards and Implementation of Related Zoning Code Amendments for Residential Developments • Milpitas, CA | Zoning Code Update
• Norco, CA | Industrial Standards Update
• Novato, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Piedmont, CA | 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
• Portola Valley, CA | Conceptual Site Plans
• Portola Valley, CA | Zoning Code Amendments
• Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Form-Based Code Revisions
• Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | Riyadh Urban Code
• Saratoga, CA | Objective Design Standards
• Seal Beach, CA | Zoning Code Update
• South San Francisco, CA | Zoning Code Update
• St. Helena, CA | Zoning Code Update
• Vacaville, CA | Development Code Update
• Woodland, CA | Comprehensive Zoning Code Update

PAST WORK EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION
Geddes Ulinskas Architects
Project Designer | San Francisco, CA
September 2019 – January 2021
Urban Planning Concepts
Planning Intern | Santa Maria, CA
June 2018 – August 2018
California Polytechnic State University
B.S., City & Regional Planning | San Luis Obispo, CA
Minor in Landscape Architecture

Page 146 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 29

EXPERIENCE
Carla has ten years of experience in land use planning and environmental review services. She has managed several large projects with community outreach and engagement efforts customized to address specific project objectives, anticipated challenges and opportunities, and community concerns. She is skilled at effectively evolving community engagement strategies, as needed, to ensure responsiveness to project issues that arise during the planning process and to ensure an appropriately representative cross-section of the community and/or stakeholders are engaged. Carla has been a key player in Urban Planning Partners’ success in gaining an informed and more aligned citizenry that supports change once the change is better understood.

Carla previously managed the entitlements assistance and community engagement process for the El Cerrito Plaza TOD project. This includes strategizing with the developer team, the City of El Cerrito, and BART on an entitlements process for securing project entitlements under Assembly Bill 2923 and the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan as well as facilitating focused stakeholder meetings and both virtual and pop-up community meetings. She co-led the community engagement efforts for the Irvington BART Station Site Plan and Area Plan, collaborating closely with the City of Fremont and BART, ultimately evolving significant community opposition to valuable input and support. She also played a key part in supporting Urban Planning Partners role in leading all the City of Richmond’s community outreach and engagement efforts related to its review and ultimate approval of the Chevron Refinery Modernization project, which involved a series of educational sessions and many stakeholder and community workshops, including a final series related to prioritizing community benefits.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS
• Link21 BART East Bay Relationship Manager
• Portola Valley Housing and Safety Elements Update and Community Engagement • MTC/ABAG, Alameda County Housing Collaborative Technical Assistance, CA – Project Manager • El Cerrito Plaza BART TOD Entitlements and Community Engagement, El Cerrito and BART • Downtown and Brentwood Boulevard Specific Plan Updates • Irvington BART Station Site Plan and Area Plan Community Engagement, City of Fremont and BART • Chevron Refinery Modernization Project Outreach, Richmond, CA • Eastline Project at 2100 Telegraph Avenue Entitlements and EIR, Oakland, CA • Alameda Point Main Street Neighborhood Specific Plan CAREER
Houseal Lavigne Associates Associate Intern
Texas Low Income Housing Information Services Policy Analyst Intern Energy Solutions Contracts Manager

CERTIFICATION
IAP2 Foundations in Public Participation

EDUCATION
Master of Science, Community and Regional Planning, University of Texas at Austin Bachelor of Arts, Sociology, University of California, Davis

CARLA VIOLET
A s s o c i A t e P r i n c i P A l A n d P l A n n i n g M A n A g e r

Page 147 ends

ITEM NO. 7.
30 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC.

CURTIS BANKS, AICP
A s s o c i A t e P r i n c i P A l

EXPERIENCE
Curtis has over 30 years of experience with expertise in planning and community development, including planning, building, affordable housing, and code enforcement. He has served as a Community Development Director and has worked in a variety of capacities. Curtis has experience interacting closely with elected officials, senior management, commissioners, city departments, state and local agencies, and members of the public. He is skilled at leading staff, preparing budgets, and managing complex planning projects. He has managed comprehensive General Plan updates, Downtown Development Plan updates, Neighborhood Plans, and the preparation of ordinances. Curtis has worked on a wide variety of residential and nonresidential projects, included mixed-use projects, and has overseen the management of affordable housing programs.

Curtis was the project manager for the redevelopment of a 20-acre industrial site for the City of Redwood City.

Curtis was also the Project Director for the Saratoga Housing Element Update and EIR, the Portola Valley Housing and Safety Element Updates IS/MND, and the Antioch Housing and Safety Element Updates and EIR.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS
• Harbor View Redevelopment Project, Contract Planning, Redwood City, CA • 505 East Bayshore Townhouse Project, Contract Planning Redwood City, CA • Roselli Park Expansion IS/MND, Contract Planning, Redwood City, CA • 6781 Thorton Avenue Mixed Use Project, Contract Planning, Newark, CA • Affordable Housing Program Management, Foster City, CA • Land Use/Circulation, Housing, and Recreation Elements of the General Plan, Foster City, CA • Foster Square Mixed Use Senior Development, Foster City, CA • Pilgrim Triton Master Plan, Foster City, CA
• Levee Protection Planning and Improvements Project, Foster City, CA • Gilead Sciences Master Plan, Foster City, CA
• Lincoln Centre Life Sciences Research Campus Project, Foster City, CA CAREER
City of Foster City Community Development Director/Planning Manager/Senior Planner City of Los Gatos Planning Consultant
City of Los Altos Senior Planner
City of Mountain View Senior Planner
City of Morgan Hill Senior Planner
City of Menlo Park Associate Planner
City of Campbell Planner II/I/Intern

EDUCATION
Master of Urban & Regional Planning, San Jose State University Bachelor of Arts, Public Administration/Political Science, Hayward State University

Page 148 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 31

EXPERIENCE
Grant’s background in long-range planning, policy development, and program implementation allows him to support Urban Planning Partners with long-range planning efforts, entitlements assistance, and development application review. In his previous work with Dudek, Grant provided support with existing conditions analyses, public workshops and outreach events, and policy writing. He has experience working in a variety of communities on issues related to land use, transportation, climate resilience, and environmental justice.

Moreover, he has helped manage both large and small long-range planning projects.

Drawing upon his strong technical experience, Grant effectively analyzes data and create maps and graphics to convey research findings, design and facilitate community outreach activities, and develop actionable policies to address issues and achieve project goals. He is currently assisting to develop tools to advance affordable housing development in jurisdictions throughout Alameda County via the Alameda County Housing Collaborative.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS
• MTC/ABAG, Alameda County Housing Collaborative Technical Assistance, CA • Newport Beach Comprehensive General Plan Update, Newport Beach, CA* • Fresno Climate Adaptation Plan and Environmental Justice Element, Fresno, CA* • Concord Housing Element Update, Concord, CA*
• Rialto General Plan Update, Rialto, CA*
• Eureka Waterfront Specific Plan, Eureka, CA*
• Clark County Aging Readiness Plan, Clark County, WA*
• Ventura County ADU Ordinance Update, Ventura County, CA* CAREER
Dudek Planner II
County of Ventura CivicSpark Fellow
Institute of Transportation Studies Advanced Research Aid

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning, University of California, Davis * Work with previous employer

GRANT SLES

ASSOCIATE PLANNER

Page 149 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

TIMELINE

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB Task 1:

Project Initiation,
Analysis, and
Recommendations
Task 2:

Community
Engagement
Task 3:

Administrative Draft
Objective Design
Standards
Task 4:

Public Review Draft
Objective Design
Standards
Task 5:

Review and Adoption
2025 2026
Town of Los Gatos
Updated/Additional Objective Design Standards
Project Schedule | October 26, 2024
Analysis and Site
Evaluation
Project Initiation
Meeting
TC Hearing
PC Hearing
Working Meetings
Consultant Effort Meeting Community Workshop Product Public Hearing Public Review
Draft ODS
Recommendations
Memo
Engagement
Program
Focus Group
Meetings
Community
Workshop Admin Draft
ODS
Working Meetings

Page 150 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

SAMPLES
City Name Project (Link to)
City of Piedmont Multi-Family and Mixed-Use Design Standards City of Saratoga Article 15-58 - Mixed-Use and Multi-Family Design and Development Standards
City of Redwood City Residential Design Guide

DISCLOSURE OF LITIGATION/DISCIPLINE
As the President and CEO of Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc., I attest that the firm has not been disciplined or censured by a regulatory body within the last 5 years nor has the firm been involved in litigation or other legal proceedings relating to the provision of services.

Lisa Wise, AICP
President, CEO
[email protected]
(805) 595-1345

Page 151 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

REFERENCES

Page 152 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Page 153 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

INSURANCE COVERAGE

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER CONTACT
NAME:

PHONE FAX (A/C, No, Ext): (A/C, No):

E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP TYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO- POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
OTHER: $

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident) $
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $

PER OTH- STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A
(Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$
$
$
$
3/28/2024
License # 0305584
(805) 543-6887 341 (805) 543-3064
11000
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.
983 Osos Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
24082
34630
29459
A 2,000,000
51SBABA5314 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 1,000,000
10,000
2,000,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
B 1,000,000
BAS56524792 4/1/2024 4/1/2025
C
LIWC524575 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
D Professional Liab. 51PG028245723 4/1/2024 Per Claim & Agg. 2,000,000 D Professional Liab. 51PG028245723 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 Deductible 5,000 Re: Proof of Insurance.

Proof of Insurance
LISAWIS-01 BOTCERTS
Morris & Garritano Insurance Agency, Inc.

PO Drawer 1189
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Megan Chew
[email protected]
Sentinel Insurance Company
Ohio Security Insurance Company
Oak River Insurance Company
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
X
4/1/2025
X
X
X
X

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER CONTACT
NAME:

PHONE FAX (A/C, No, Ext): (A/C, No):

E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP TYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

PRO- POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
OTHER: $

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $

PER OTH- STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A (Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$
$
$
$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
3/28/2024
License # 0305584
(805) 543-6887 341 (805) 543-3064
11000
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.
983 Osos Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
24082
34630
29459
A 2,000,000
51SBABA5314 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 1,000,000
10,000
2,000,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
B 1,000,000
BAS56524792 4/1/2024 4/1/2025
C
LIWC524575 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
D Professional Liab. 51PG028245723 4/1/2024 Per Claim & Agg. 2,000,000 D Professional Liab. 51PG028245723 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 Deductible 5,000 Re: Proof of Insurance.

Proof of Insurance
LISAWIS-01 BOTCERTS
Morris & Garritano Insurance Agency, Inc.

Page 154 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

PRELIMINARY FEE SCHEDULE
Town of Los Gatos
Updated/Additional Objective Design Standards
Budget Worksheet | October 26, 2024
Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee 1A Project Initiation Meeting and Site Tour 2 $ 594 4 $ 1,000 8 $ 1,560 8 $ 1,280 22 4,434 6 $ 1,500 6 $ 1,380 6 $ 930 18 $ 3,810 40 $ 8,244 1B Analyses and Evaluation - $ - 4 $ 1,000 20 $ 3,900 20 $ 3,200 44 8,100 2 $ 500 4 $ 920 6 $ 930 12 $ 2,350 56 $ 10,450 1C Recommendations Memo 2 $ 594 4 $ 1,000 20 $ 3,900 20 $ 3,200 46 8,694 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 46 $ 8,694 4 $ 1,188 12 $ 3,000 48 $ 9,360 48 $ 7,680 112 $ 21,228 8 $ 2,000 10 $ 2,300 12 $ 1,860 30 $ 6,160 142 $ 27,388 2A Community Engagement Program $ - 2 $ 500 6 $ 1,170 6 $ 960 14 2,630 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 14 $ 2,630 2B Focus Group Meetings (2) - $ - 4 $ 1,000 12 $ 2,340 12 $ 1,920 28 5,260 8 $ 2,000 12 $ 2,760 16 $ 2,480 36 $ 7,240 64 $ 12,500 2C Community Workshop - $ - 8 $ 2,000 32 $ 6,240 32 $ 5,120 72 13,360 8 $ 2,000 24 $ 5,520 40 $ 6,200 72 $ 13,720 144 $ 27,080 - $ - 14 $ 3,500 50 $ 9,750 50 $ 8,000 114 $ 21,250 16 $ 4,000 36 $ 8,280 56 $ 8,680 108 $ 20,960 222 $ 42,210 3A Working Meetings with Town Staff (2) - $ - 2 $ 500 8 $ 1,560 8 $ 1,280 18 3,340 6 $ 1,500 8 $ 1,840 8 $ 1,240 22 $ 4,580 40 $ 7,920 3B Administrative Draft ODS - $ - 4 $ 1,000 36 $ 7,020 36 $ 5,760 76 13,780 2 $ 500 6 $ 1,380 8 $ 1,240 16 $ 3,120 92 $ 16,900 - $ - 6 $ 1,500 44 $ 8,580 44 $ 7,040 94 $ 17,120 8 $ 2,000 14 $ 3,220 16 $ 2,480 38 $ 7,700 132 $ 24,820 4A Working Meetings with Town Staff (2) - $ - 2 $ 500 6 $ 1,170 6 $ 960 14 2,630 6 $ 1,500 8 $ 1,840 8 $ 1,240 22 $ 4,580 36 $ 7,210 4B Public Review Draft ODS 2 $ 594 4 $ 1,000 16 $ 3,120 16 $ 2,560 38 7,274 2 $ 500 6 $ 1,380 8 $ 1,240 16 $ 3,120 54 $ 10,394 2 $ 594 6 $ 1,500 22 $ 4,290 22 $ 3,520 52 $ 9,904 8 $ 2,000 14 $ 3,220 16 $ 2,480 38 $ 7,700 90 $ 17,604 5A Planning Commission Hearing (1) $ - 4 $ 1,000 12 $ 2,340 12 $ 1,920 28 5,260 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 28 $ 5,260 5B Town Council Hearing (1) - $ - 4 $ 1,000 10 $ 1,950 10 $ 1,600 24 4,550 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 24 $ 4,550 - $ - 8 $ 2,000 22 $ 4,290 22 $ 3,520 52 $ 9,810 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 52 $ 9,810 1,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500 - $ 3,000
6 $ 1,782 46 $ 11,500 186 $ 36,270 186 $ 29,760 424 $ 80,812 40 $ 10,000 74 $ 17,020 100 $ 15,500 214 $ 44,020 638 $ 124,832 6A Additional Focus Groups (per meeting) - $ - 4 $ 1,000 8 $ 1,560 8 $ 1,280 20 3,840 4 $ 1,000 6 $ 1,380 8 $ 1,240 18 $ 3,620 38 $ 7,460 6B Educational Story Map and Survey - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - - - 6 $ 1,500 8 $ 1,840 24 $ 3,720 38 $ 7,060 38 $ 7,060 6C Test Site Feasibility Analysis/Proforma 8 $ 2,376 24 $ 6,000 24 $ 4,680 16 $ 2,560 72 15,616 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 72 $ 15,616 6D Community Open House on PRD - $ - 8 $ 2,000 24 $ 4,680 24 $ 3,840 56 10,520 8 $ 2,000 24 $ 5,520 24 $ 3,720 56 $ 11,240 112 $ 21,760 6E PC/TC Study Session (per meeting) 2 $ 594 6 $ 1,500 16 $ 3,120 16 $ 2,560 40 7,774 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 40 $ 7,774 6F PC/TC Hearing (per hearing) 2 $ 594 4 $ 1,000 10 $ 1,950 10 $ 1,600 26 5,144 - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - 26 $ 5,144

OPTIONAL TASKS
TASK 5 REVIEW AND ADOPTION
TASK 3 ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT
Project Total
Task 4 Subtotal
Task 5 Subtotal
Task 1 Subtotal
Task 2 Subtotal
Task 3 Subtotal
Direct Costs (Not to Exceed)
TASK 1 PROJECT INITIATION AND ANALYSIS
Senior
TASK 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
UPP Total
TASK 4 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
$230
TOTAL
LWC
Principal Project Manager Project Planner
UPP
Associate LWC Total
$297 $250 $195 $160
Director
$250
Principal
$155
LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | 37 Page 155 ITEM NO. 7.
38 | TOWN OF LOS GATOS | OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC.

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 156 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

This page intentionally left blank.

Page 157 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES
LISAWISECONSULTING.COM | 805-595-1345

Page 158 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Agreement for Consultant Services
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Page 1 of 6 ends

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on ___________________ by and between TOWN OF LOS GATOS, a California municipal corporation, (“Town”) and Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (“Consultant”), whose address is 983 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401. This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts.

I. RECITALS

1.1 The Town desires to engage Consultant to provide Objective Design Standards services.

1.2 The Consultant represents and affirms that it is willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement.

1.3 Consultant warrants it possesses the distinct professional skills, qualifications, experience, and resources necessary to timely perform the services described in this Agreement.

Consultant acknowledges Town has relied upon these warranties to retain Consultant.

II. AGREEMENTS

2.1 Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide services as described in that certain Objective Design Standards Consultant Services Proposal sent to the Town on October 26, 2024, which is hereby incorporated by reference and attached as Attachment 1.

2.2 Term and Time of Performance. This contract will remain in effect from Upon Execution to June 30, 2026. Consultant shall perform the services described in this Agreement as follows: Objective Design Standards Consultant Services.

2.3 Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations. Consultant represents and warrants to Town that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a Town of Los Gatos business license pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Code of the Town of Los Gatos.

2.4 Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.

2.5 Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by the Town and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the Town’s property and shall be delivered to the Town upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the Town's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the Town to the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of the these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the Consultant or the Town without the written consent of the Town before such release. The Town acknowledges that the reports ATTACHMENT 2

Page 159 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Agreement for Consultant Services
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Page 2 of 6 ends

to be prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and Town's use of the information contained in the reports prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at Town's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. Town further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant.

2.6 Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall not exceed $189,646 at the rates set forth on page 39 in Attachment 1, Objective Design Standards Consultant Services Proposal, inclusive of all costs. Payment shall be based upon Town approval of each task.

2.7 Billing. Billing shall be monthly by invoice within thirty (30) days of the rendering of the service and shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom, at what rate, and on what date. Also, plans, specifications, documents, or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for Town review, even if only in partial or draft form.

Payment shall be net thirty (30) days. All invoices and statements to the Town shall be addressed as follows:

Invoices:

Town of Los Gatos
Attn: Accounts Payable
P.O. Box 655
Los Gatos, CA 95031-0655

2.8 Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not less than three years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available to authorized personnel of the Town at the Consultant's offices during business hours upon written request of the Town.

2.9 Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of the Town.

2.10 Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the Town. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to Town employee(s). With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of

Page 160 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Agreement for Consultant Services
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Page 3 of 6 ends

compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing.

2.11 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities are solely to the Town. The Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within the Town of Los Gatos. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the Staff or management of the Town or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of the Town in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest, should it discover it has done so and shall, at the Town's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify Town of this employment relationship, and shall, at the Town's sole discretion, sever any such employment relationship.

2.12 Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act.

III. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

3.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance:
i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her firm to an amount not less than: two million dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. iii. Consultant shall provide to the Town all certificates of insurance, with original endorsements effecting coverage. Consultant agrees that all certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the Town before work commences.

Page 161 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Agreement for Consultant Services
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Page 4 of 6 ends

iv. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) which is sufficient to insure Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the performance of the particular scope of work under this agreement.

General Liability:
i. The Town, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; and premises owned or used by the Consultant. This requirement does not apply to the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and omissions.
ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Town, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurances maintained by the Town, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the Town, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.
iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

3.2 All Coverages. Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Town. Current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this Agreement with the Town Clerk.

3.3 Workers’ Compensation. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law and shall provide evidence of such policy to the Town before beginning services under this Agreement. Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees.

3.4 Indemnification. The Consultant shall save, keep, hold harmless and indemnify, and defend the Town its officers, agent, employees, and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be set up

Page 162 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Agreement for Consultant Services
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Page 5 of 6 ends

because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work which may be occasioned by a willful or negligent act or omissions of the Consultant, or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant.

IV. GENERAL TERMS

4.1 Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

4.2 Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara.

4.3 Termination of Agreement. The Town and the Consultant shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen days (15) written notice of termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the Town all plans, files, documents, and reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of such termination, Town shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the Town bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination.

4.4 Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the Town and the Consultant.

4.5 Disputes. In any dispute over any aspect of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, including costs of appeal.

4.6 Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to:

Town of Los Gatos
Attn: Town Clerk
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Attn: Lisa Wise
983 Osos Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant designates in writing to Town.

Page 163 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Agreement for Consultant Services
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Page 6 of 6 ends

4.7 Order of Precedence. In the event of any conflict, contradiction, or ambiguity between the terms and conditions of this Agreement in respect of the Products or Services and any attachments to this Agreement, then the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail over attachments or other writings.

4.8 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including all Exhibits, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the Town and Consultant. No terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and Consultant have executed this Agreement.

Town of Los Gatos by:

Chris Constantin, Town Manager Date

Recommended by:

Joel Paulson, Date
Community Development Director
Consultant, by:

Lisa Wise, AICP, President, CEO Date
Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.

Approved as to Form:

Gabrielle Whelan, Town Attorney Date
Attest:

Wendy Wood, CMC, Town Clerk Date

Page 164 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

Page 165 ends

ITEM NO. 7.

PREPARED BY: Ryan Baker
Library Director
Reviewed by: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Finance Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 8
DATE: January 30, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the 2025 Work Plans Recommended by the Town’s Library Board, Arts and Culture Commission, Complete Streets and Transportation Commission, and Finance Commission
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the 2025 Work Plans recommended by the Town’s Library Board, Arts and Culture Commission, Complete Streets and Transportation Commission, and Finance Commission.

BACKGROUND:

In order to provide Town Commissions/Committees/Boards (Commissions) clarity from the Town Council regarding their work, staff recommends the Town Council review and approve each Commission’s work plan for the year. This will ensure Council support, efficient use of Commissioners’ time, and sufficient staff resources for the Commission’s projects in 2025.

Certain Commissions are exempt from this process due to their specific functions. The exempt Commissions have items presented to them for consideration rather than the Commissions creating their own work plans. These exempt Commissions include the Planning Commission, General Plan Committee, Historic Preservation Committee, and Personnel Board.

DISCUSSION:

In coordination with other Town Departments, the attached work plans were drafted by the Commission’s staff liaison, taking workload, time commitment, changes in legislation, and alignment with Council priorities into consideration.

Page 166 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

PAGE 2 OF 2
SUBJECT: Library Board, and Arts and Culture Commission Work Plans DATE: January 30, 2025
The Library Board work plan (Attachment 1) was discussed by the Library Board at their regular meeting on January 8, 2025. The Library Board moved unanimously to recommend the draft work plan, as presented, for Council approval without alteration or addition.

The Arts and Culture Commission work plan (Attachment 2) was discussed by the Arts and Culture Commission at their regular meeting on January 15, 2025. The Arts and Culture Commission moved unanimously to recommend the draft work plan, as presented, for Council approval without alteration or addition.

The Complete Streets and Transportation Commission work plan was discussed at that Commission’s January 9, 2025 regular meeting. The CSTC discussed the draft work plan presented by staff and added one item related to coordination with the County of Santa Clara regarding the Festival of Lights. One other item related to bus passes was expanded to include students rather than only seniors. The resulting work plan (Attachment 3) was adopted by the CSTC by a vote of 5-0-2, with Youth Commissioner Sharma and Commission Miano absent.

The Finance Commission work plan was discussed by the Finance Commission at their special meeting on January 13, 2025. The Finance Commission requested to add the review of the Fiscal Impact Analysis Study Scope. With this addition, the Commission moved unanimously to recommend the work plan for Council approval as presented in Attachment 4.

Staff feels that the items contained in these work plans are manageable for 2025. The addition of more items to these work plans would impact staff capacity and is not recommended in the 2025 calendar year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact is associated with this item.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

This is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required.

Attachments:

1. Library Board 2025 Work Plan

2. Arts and Culture Commission 2025 Work Plan

3. Complete Streets and Transportation Work Plan

4. Finance Commission 2025 Work Plan

Page 167 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

Library Board 2025 Work Plan

1. Library policy updates necessitated by AB1825 (2024) “California Freedom to Read Act”.
a. Update the Library’s Collection Development policy to conform with State legislation.
b. Integrate the currently separate Materials Deaccession policy into the Collection Development policy.
c. Review a process created by staff that meets the provisions of the legislation for the public to formally challenge/object to library materials.

2. Library policy updates necessitated by AB781 (2024) “Accessibility to Emergency Centers: Persons with Pets”.
a. Update existing Library Code of Conduct to conform with AB781, or if appropriate, remove the section regarding animals in the Library to a separate policy.
b. Examine current ADA service animal laws, and review/amend Library service animal policies to ensure compliance.

3. Annual Community Survey of Library Services
a. Work with staff to create and review the Library’s annual community input/satisfaction survey.
b. Analysis of survey results and suggest any additions or amendments to strategic direction to staff for consideration.

4. Annual review of Library Code of Conduct for any changes/modifications suggested by staff as a result of new or changing patron incidents or behaviors.

5. Receive informational presentation from staff regarding annual library statistics and trends.

6. Library policy update for the Library’s Lost Property policy (2017) to reflect current staff practice.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 168 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

Arts and Culture Commission 2025 Work Plan

1. Public Arts Master Plan draft for Council review and approval in 2026. Estimated to be completed over a two-year period, this document will address 2040 General Plan items PFS

25.1 through PFS 25.7, as well providing a guiding document and framework for implementation of the Town’s Public Arts Fund Ordinance Chapter 25, Article VII, Section

25.70.000. The following steps of the process are estimated to be completed in 2025. a. Conduct a community survey in an online format to incorporate more public feedback in the Public Arts Master Plan.
b. Draft objective standards for public art in private development based on best practices from neighboring jurisdictions.
c. Draft arts policies based on best practices from other jurisdictions for:
i. Call for Artists and Artist Selection Process
ii. Public Art Maintenance Requirements and Limitations iii. Murals on Town property
d. Draft the Master Plan section for incorporation of public art in Town parks and infrastructure.

2. Gateway Project. This project is nearing completion with the commissioned gateway sculptures already in production by the artist.
a. Identify a location for Gateway Sculpture Phase 4 and Phase 5, and confirm locations with PPW.
b. Installation of Gateway Sculpture Phase 4 with a target date of June 2025, and Phase 5 with a target date of December 2025. This will close out the project.

3. Outside the Box, utility box art wraps. This is an annual project which is funded to cover four utility boxes each year with artwork through an open community call for artists. a. Identify locations for the next round of the Outside the Box program, and confirm locations with PPW.
b. Open the application for artists and review submissions for judging.

4. Art in the Council Chambers. This is slated as an ongoing annual project to rotate three exhibits in the Council Chambers each year.
a. Review applications for Art in the Council Chambers exhibits through an open call for artists.
b. (Subcommittee assignment) Install a new exhibit every four months, and host an opening reception.

5. Finish creating a brochure with information about the Commission (project started in 2024).

6. (As needed or requested) Provide input on projects that incorporate public artwork per the Town’s Public Arts Fund Ordinance, and provide input when requested by PPW on CIP projects that incorporate public art.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 169 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

ATTACHMENT 3
Recommended 2025 CSTC Commission Work Plan

1. Commission to review staff’s recommendations regarding improvements and modifications to the Downtown Parking Program and Residential Permit Parking Programs. (Relates to Mobility Element Implementation Program S).

2. Commission to review staff’s work relating to reducing cut through traffic, building on the work completed by the Beach Traffic Ad Hoc that will sunset in June 2025. (Relates to Mobility Element Implementation Program N)

3. Commission to continue work of the Bus Pass Ad Hoc to evaluate potential subsidized public transit fares for seniors and students (Relates to Public Facilities, Services and Infrastructure Implementation Program KK).

4. Commission to receive presentations regarding proposed transportation related capital projects and provide feedback and recommendations to staff for consideration.

5. Commission to receive updates regarding staff coordination with Santa Clara County Parks Departments regarding Fantasy of Lights event and its impact on Town of Los Gatos transportation assets, including Los Gatos Creek Trail.

Page 170 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

Finance Commission 2025 Work Plan
Items Projects Assignments Frequency Finance Commission Target Date(s) Notes 1 General Fund Reserve Fund Policy Review current policy and consider recommendations related to how funds should be classified going forward in FY 2025/26.
3/10/2025
Review of policy should inform the
2025-26 fiscal year budget.
2 Educational Development Schedule a joint meeting of the Finance Commission and Town Council to provide education on local government
budgeting and financial reporting.

Tentative 5/12/2025, Based on Consultant and Council
availability.

Consider bringing in experts from the
GFOA to conduct this in person
training.
3 OPEB Review Perform a due diligience review of OPEB investment program.
10/13/2025
Third party review of OPEB program.
4 Council Priority Scorecard Continue the work of the ad hoc committee to discuss framework for a Council scorecard and start developing
top level metrics for consideration which can be
supported by existing data systems.
6/9/2025
This process will be iterative to be able
to frame appropriate measures which
can be readily maintained.
5 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Establish the structure for a multi-years CIP which will focus on identifying current and future capital needs,
determine the funding level required to support those
needs, and start moving towards a comprehensive
approach to capital planning. 10/13/2025
This will be a multiyear process due to
the many pieces that need to be
integrated for a comprehensive capital
plan.
6 Review the Scope of the Comprehensive Fiscal
Impact Analysis
Comprehensive Fiscal Impact Analysis including Scenario Sensitivity Analysis with Risks and Opportunities which will evaluate the potential fiscal impact of planned growth.

TBD Based on Community Services Director Timeline
This process is led by the Community
Development Department.

A
Five-Year Forecast Discuss Assumptions for the Five-Year Forecast Annually 2/10/2025; 3/10/2025 Report Back on Council Action B
Operating and Capital Budget Review and Make Recommendations on the Proposed Annual Budgets Annually
4/28/2025; 5/5/2025; 5/12/2025 (Published on
4/21/2025 - No Meeting)
C
Mid-Year Budget Review and Make Recommendation on the Mid-Year Report Annually 2/10/2025
D Audit Plan Review Pre-Audit Meeting Annually 9/8/2025 E
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Review and Make Recommendations on the Draft Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Annually 12/1/2025; 12/8/2025 F
State Controller Financial Transaction Report Review and Make Recommendations on the Town Draft Financial Transaction Report Annually 1/13/2025
G
Measure G Revenue and Expenditure Report Receive Measure G Revenue and Expenditure Report Annually 3/10/2025
H Single Audit Report Receive Single Audit Report if applicable Annually 3/10/2025 I
Financial Policies Review and Make Recommendations on the Investment Policy Annually 3/10/2025
J
Financial Policies Review and Make Recommendation on the General Fund Reserve Policy As Needed 3/10/2025
K
Investment Performance Receive Monthly Financial and Investment Report Monthly
1/13/2025; 2/10/2025; 3/10/2025; 4/14/2025; 5/12/2025;
6/9/2025; 8/11/2025; 9/8/2025; 10/13/2025; 11/10/2025;
12/8/2025 Consent Item
Required by Town Code Section 2.50 or Other Council Policy Multiyear Projects
Attachment 4

Page 171 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

Finance Commission 2025 Work Plan
L
Pension and OPEB Trust Funds Performance Receive Performance and Account Summary Reports for CERBT and CEPPT Quarterly 3/10/2025; 6/9/2025; 9/8/2025; 12/8/2025 Consent Item M CalPERS Actuarial Reports Receive CalPERS Annual Actuarial Reports Annually 10/13/2025 Consent Item N
OPEB Actuarial Analysis Receive OPEB Actuarial Analysis Every Two Year N/A
O
CalPERS Performance Receive CalPERS Public Employees' Retirement Fund (PERF) Preiminary Performance Report Annually 12/8/2025 Consent Item

Page 172 ends

ITEM NO. 8.

TOWN OF LOS GATOS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/04/2025
ITEM NO: 9
DATE: January 30, 2025
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Chris Constantin, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Consider a Recommendation by the Planning Commission to Approve a Planned Development for Construction of a Senior Living Community, Removal of Large Protected Trees, and Site Improvements Requiring a Grading Permit on Property Zoned R:PD; Adopt a Resolution Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and Introduce an Ordinance Repealing Establishing Development Standards and Allowable Uses for Lots Within the Planned Development Overlay Zone. Located at 110 Wood Road. APN 510- 47-038. An Environmental Impact Report has been Prepared for the Project.

Planned Development Application PD-20-001 and Environmental Impact Report EIR-21-002. Applicant: Rockwood Pacific. Property Owner: Front Porch Communities. Project Planner: Sean Mullin.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Town Council accept the Planning Commission’s recommendation to adopt a resolution certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and introduce an ordinance repealing and replacing Planned Development Ordinance 938 establishing development standards and allowable uses for lots within the Planned Development Overlay Zone.

BACKGROUND:

The subject site is approximately 10.84-acres consisting of two underlying parcels at the intersection of Wood Road and South Santa Cruz Avenue. The property rises east-to-west

Page 173 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

PAGE 2 OF 7
SUBJECT: 110 Wood Road/PD-20-001 AND EIR-21-002
DATE: January 30, 2025
approximately 240 feet, and approximately 95 feet across the area of development. The subject property is characterized by a hillside setting and is in the Hillside Specific Plan area, but it is not located within the hillside area as defined by the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines (HDS&G).

Ordinance 938 was adopted by the Council on March 4, 1968, rezoning the subject property from R-1:40 and RM:8 to R:PD (Residential with a Planned Development overlay), allowing for the construction of the Los Gatos Meadows senior living facility. The site had been occupied by the Los Gatos Meadows since 1971.

In February 2019, the Los Gatos Meadows facility initiated a closure and transition process to relocate all residents. By September 2019, the facility was vacant. While the property owner, Front Porch Communities, has completed the closure process, the property continues to be staffed to provide ongoing maintenance and to ensure the security of the property.

On February 12, 2020, an application was filed by Frank Rockwood of Rockwood Pacific requesting a new PD zoning for the property for the purpose of building a new senior living community. The existing zoning is Residential, Planned Development (R:PD), and the General Plan Land Use designation is Medium Density Residential.

A Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period from May 28, 2021, through July 12, 2021. The Final EIR, which includes the Response to Comments, was distributed on September 3, 2021. These environmental documents are available at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

On January 12, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the application and forwarded a recommendation of denial to the Council based on the following concerns:
 Building heights;
 Tree removal;
 Lack of diversity in housing types;
 Concentration of luxury housing units; and
 Ratio of the number of units (fewer than existing) to the overall height (greater than existing).

Additionally, the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final EIR because it is based on a project that the Planning Commission found to be inappropriate, and environmental review is not required for denial of a project. The Planning Commission staff reports and meeting minutes are available at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

On April 5, 2022, The Town Council considered the application and several options presented by the applicant that were developed to respond to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. Included with these options was the relocation of some of the building mass by

Page 174 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

PAGE 3 OF 7
SUBJECT: 110 Wood Road/PD-20-001 AND EIR-21-002
DATE: January 30, 2025
reducing the height of some Villas and increasing the height of other Villas. Following public comment and Council discussion, the application was remanded back to the Planning Commission for further discussion with consideration of comments provided by the Town Council, which included but were not limited to the following:
 Concern with proposed building heights, tall wall planes, and lack of screening;  Appreciative of the applicant’s regard for fire safety;  Preference for Options A and B;
 Support removal of penthouse units;
 Not supportive of removing parking to reduce grading; and  Provide a full set of drawings and details for the revised project.

The Town Council staff reports and meeting minutes are available at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

On October 25, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted a Study Session on a revised proposal presented in a conceptual fashion to allow the applicant to receive initial feedback prior to submitting a fully revised project. During the Study Session, the Planning Commission noted the following positive aspects of the revised conceptual project:
 Reduction in grading;
 Elimination of the penthouse units; and
 Potential offsite programming at 142 S. Santa Cruz Avenue as a community benefit.

The Planning Commission also expressed concerns on the following aspects of the revised conceptual project:
 Overall height, consider expanding the development pad to lower the height of buildings;  Visibility impacts when viewed from downtown and from neighboring residences on Wood Road; and
 Unit size and targeting of the luxury market.

The Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes are available at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission received the staff report, received public comments, and discussed a revised project. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the Council to certify the Final EIR, adopt the MMRP, and approve the project with an added recommendation that the applicant consider height reductions where possible to address the neighbor’s concerns. The Planning Commission staff report, addendum, desk item, and meeting minutes are included as Attachments 5 through 8 and are available at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

Page 175 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

PAGE 4 OF 7
SUBJECT: 110 Wood Road/PD-20-001 AND EIR-21-002
DATE: January 30, 2025
DISCUSSION:

A. Project Summary:

The applicant is requesting approval of a PD Ordinance for a new senior living community to replace the closed Los Gatos Meadows. The new development includes 187 independent care units and 24 supporting care units located within a podium level and eight villas rising up to six stories above the podium. Two levels of parking are proposed on the ground floor/ podium level and the lower level. Primary access to the site would be provided from Wood Road. Emergency circulation is provided by a ring road around the podium and out to Broadway.

Full discussion and analysis of the project is provided in the November 13, 2024, Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 5).

With the adoption of the draft ordinance, Planned Development Ordinance 938 would be repealed and replaced with the draft PD Ordinance (Attachment 4) to establish the development standards and allowable uses for the subject property consistent with the development plans included as Exhibit B to Attachment 4. If the PD Ordinance is adopted, future Architecture and Site approval will be required prior to a submittal for construction permits.

B. Planning Commission:

On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission received the staff report, applicant’s presentation, and public comments on the proposed project (Attachments 5 through 8).

The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the Council to certify the Final EIR, adopt the MMRP, and approve the project with an added recommendation that the applicant consider height reductions where possible to address the neighbor’s concerns.

In their December 30, 2024, letter to the Council included as Attachment 9, the applicant summarizes their project and notes that they believe that the proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission achieves an appropriate balance between the numerous applicable factors involved. In response to the recommendation by the Planning Commission, the applicant provides an alternate version that redistributes the height of a portion of Villa A to Villa B. The impact is a height reduction in the rear/uphill portion of Villa A by one floor and the addition of a full floor to Villa B. The applicant indicates that the alternate version is intended to mitigate the view impacts to several homeowners on Wood Road without materially increasing view impacts from other key viewpoints.

Page 176 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

PAGE 5 OF 7
SUBJECT: 110 Wood Road/PD-20-001 AND EIR-21-002
DATE: January 30, 2025
FISCAL IMPACT:

Certifying the EIR, adopting the MMRP, and adopting of this PD Ordinance does not impact the Town’s budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

An EIR was prepared for the project. As part of the environmental review process, a number of technical reports were prepared, including species lists and database reviews, tree evaluations and arborist reports, geotechnical investigations, and traffic analyses. Reports that were prepared by outside consultants were peer-reviewed by Town consultants.

The Notice of Preparation (NOP) was distributed on February 1, 2021, for a 30-day comment period. Comments received on the NOP are included as Appendix A to the Draft EIR, which is available online at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

The Notice of Completion and Availability for Review of the Draft EIR was released on May 28, 2021, with the 45-day public review period ending on July 12, 2021. On June 23, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to accept comments on the Draft EIR. No comments were received at this meeting. Written comments on the Draft EIR were received from the applicant, one public agency, and three individuals. The Final EIR, with Response to Comments, was completed in August 2021 and is available online at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad.

Through the Initial Study/EIR process, no significant and unavoidable impacts were identified.

All identified significant impacts that would result from the project can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through the implementation of the MMRP that has been prepared for the project as required by CEQA (Attachment 3, Exhibit B). The MMRP includes a list of all mitigation measures and the department(s) responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measures are properly implemented. All mitigation measures are included as performance standards within the draft PD Ordinance (Attachment 4).

A Modified CEQA Checklist (based on the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Checklist) was prepared to determine if the previously prepared EIR adequately addresses the project as revised or whether the revised project will result in new or substantially increased environmental impacts requiring recirculation of the 2021 Draft EIR (Attachment 5, Exhibit 6). The analysis determined that the revised project has been adequately addressed in the Draft and Final EIR in terms of potential increases in or new environmental impacts resulting from the revised project. Any new or increased environmental impacts would be reduced to a less-than-significant level through implementation of the MMRP prepared for the 2021 EIR and standard Town conditions of approval. Therefore, additional environmental analysis and/or recirculation of the 2021 EIR is not required.

Page 177 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

PAGE 6 OF 7
SUBJECT: 110 Wood Road/PD-20-001 AND EIR-21-002
DATE: January 30, 2025
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

As detailed in the Letter of Justification, the applicant has been engaged with the surrounding neighborhood, business community, Town officials, and the greater Los Gatos community since 2018 through open house meetings, focus groups, individual in-person and video meetings, and maintenance of a project website (Attachment 5, Exhibit 13). The applicant also provided a supplemental community engagement letter summarizing their outreach efforts that have taken place since the Letter of Justification was submitted (Attachment 5, Exhibit 15).

Written notice was sent to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject property. As approved by the Council, visual renderings were prepared in-place of story poles and made available on the applicant’s website for some time and provided on the Town’s website on November 4, 2024. Project signs were also installed at the primary entrance on Wood Road and at the intersection of Farwell Lane and Broadway. Public comments received between 11:01 a.m., Wednesday, November 13, 2024, and 11:00 a.m., Thursday, January 30, 2025, are included as Attachment 10.

CONCLUSION:

A. Summary
The applicant is requesting approval of a PD Ordinance for a new senior living community to replace the closed Los Gatos Meadows. Planned Development Ordinance 938 would be repealed and replaced with the draft PD Ordinance to establish the development standards and allowable uses for the subject property consistent with the development plans included as Attachment 4, Exhibit B and subject to the performance standards included as Attachment 4, Exhibit C. If the PD Ordinance is adopted, future Architecture and Site approval will be required prior to submittal for construction permits.

B. Recommendation
Staff recommends the Town Council take the following actions to approve the PD, application:

1. Adopt the draft Resolution (Attachment 3) to make the required CEQA Findings of Fact (Attachment 3, Exhibit A), certify the Final EIR (Attachment 2), and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment 3, Exhibit B); and

2. Introduce the Ordinance (Attachment 4) effecting the zone change and approving Planned Development Ordinance application PD-20-002.

Page 178 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

PAGE 7 OF 7
SUBJECT: 110 Wood Road/PD-20-001 AND EIR-21-002
DATE: January 30, 2025
C. Alternatives
Alternatively, the Council can:

1. Approve the applications with additional and/or modified performance standards; or

2. Continue the matter to a date certain with specific direction; or

3. Deny the applications and make the required findings for denial.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachments previously received under separate cover:

1. May 2021 Draft Environmental Impact Report
(available online at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad)

2. August 2021 Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (available online at www.losgatosca.gov/110WoodRoad) Attachments received with this Staff Report:

3. Draft Resolution to certify the Final EIR, make the required CEQA Findings of Fact (included as Exhibit A), and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (included as Exhibit B)

4. Draft Planned Development Ordinance with Exhibit A Rezone Area, Exhibit B Development Plans, and Exhibit C Performance Standards

5. November 13, 2024, Planning Commission Staff Report, with Exhibits 3 through 17

6. November 13, 2024, Planning Commission Addendum, with Exhibits 18 through 19

7. November 13, 2024, Planning Commission Desk Item, with Exhibit 30

8. November 13, 2024, Planning Commission Verbatim Minutes

9. Letter from the Applicant, dated December 30, 2024

10. Public comments received between 11:01 am, Wednesday, November 13, 2024 and 11:00 am, Thursday, January 30, 2025

Page 179 ends

ITEM NO. 9.
1 of 4
Draft Resolution Adoption Date

DRAFT RESOLUTION

RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

CERTIFYING A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, APPROVING A MITIGATION

AND MONITORING PLAN, AND

MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN CONNECTION WITH A ZONE CHANGE FROM R:PD TO R:PD

FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
110 WOOD ROAD (APN 510-47-038).

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: PD-20-001
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: EIR-21-002
WHEREAS, the applicant, Rockwood Pacific, proposes a Planned Development to rezone the property located at 110 Wood Road from R:PD to R:PD, to allow for the demolition of all existing buildings, construction of a new senior living community, removal of large protected trees, and site improvements requiring a Grading Permit; WHEREAS, the project includes a Planned Development application (PD-20-001) and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR-21-002);
WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Planned Development (PD-20-001) was distributed on February 1, 2021, for a 30-day comment period;
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion and Availability for review of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) was prepared and issued for agency and public review and comment on May 28, 2021, for a 45-day public review period ending on July 12, 2021; WHEREAS, on June 23, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to accept comments on the Draft EIR. No comments were received at this meeting. Written comments on the Draft EIR were received from the applicant, one public agency, and three individuals;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the implementing Guidelines adopted therefore (CEQA), the Town prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR), incorporating responses to comments on the Draft EIR which was issued in August 2021;
Draft Resolution to be
modified by Town
Council deliberations
and direction.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 180 ends

ITEM NO. 9.
2 of 4
Draft Resolution Adoption Date
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November 13, 2024, at which time the Commission considered the public testimony, the staff report prepared for that meeting (Staff Report), and all other documentation related to the Planned Development and Final EIR, and forwarded a recommendation that the Town Council certify the Final EIR (EIR21-002) and approve the Planned Development (PD-20-001); WHEREAS, the Town Council held a duly noticed public hearing on February 4, 2025, at which time the Town Council considered the public testimony, the Staff Report, and all other documentation related to the Planned Development and Final EIR and made a motion to certify the Final EIR;
WHEREAS, the Town Council recognizes the Town’s obligation, pursuant to the Public Resources Code § 21081.6 subdivision (a), to ensure the monitoring of all adopted mitigation measures necessary to substantially lessen or avoid the significant effects of the project. Such monitoring will occur pursuant to the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Town Council’s decision is based is in the office of the Town Clerk, 110 E. Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

A. That the Town Council hereby certifies the Final EIR, adopts the CEQA Findings of Fact attached hereto as Exhibit A, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit B. In certifying the Final EIR, the Town Council specifically finds that:

1. The document has been completed in compliance with CEQA;

2. The document was presented to the Town Council as the decision-making body of the lead agency, and as such, the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained therein; and

3. The Final EIR reflects the Town’s independent judgment and analysis.

Page 181 ends

ITEM NO. 9.
3 of 4
Draft Resolution Adoption Date
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the 4
th day of February, 2025, by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

SIGNED:
___________________________________

MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
____________________________________

TOWN CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS

LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA

Page 182 ends

ITEM NO. 9.
4 of 4
Draft Resolution Adoption Date
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank

Page 183 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

D R A F T

CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT
for
110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior
Living Community
Planned Development Application PD-20-001
SCH # 2021020007
Town Council
Town of Los Gatos
February 2025

EXHIBIT A

Page 184 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR ii Draft – February 2025

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Page 185 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 iii

CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS ........................................................... 1 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................. 3 A. Project Location and Current Use ........................................................................ 3 B. Project Objectives................................................................................................. 3 C. Project Characteristics.......................................................................................... 3 IV. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES................................ 3 A. Air Quality............................................................................................................. 4 B. Biological Resources............................................................................................ 6 C. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 12 D. Geology and Soils .............................................................................................. 13 E. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................... 14 F. Wildfire Hazards ................................................................................................. 15 V. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES............................................................................. 16 A. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative – Existing (Closed) Senior Living Community.................................................................................... 17 B. Alternative 2: No Project - Residential Project Consistent with the Project Site’s General Plan Land Use Designation ............................................ 17 C. Alternative 3: Reduced Scale - Removal of Villas B and C from Proposed Site Plan............................................................................................. 17 D. Environmentally Superior Alternative.................................................................. 18 VI. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM .......................... 18 VII. RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS................................................................. 18 VII. SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 19

Page 186 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR iv Draft – February 2025

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Page 187 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 1
I. INTRODUCTION
The Draft EIR prepared for the 110 Wood Road - Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community Project (also referred to as the Project or proposed Project) identified several potentially significant environmental effects that the proposed project may cause. All of these significant effects can be fully avoided through the adoption of feasible mitigation measures. Pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15090, the Town Council of Los Gatos (Council) hereby certifies that the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the 110 Wood Road - Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community project (proposed Project) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21000 et seq. (CEQA), that the Final EIR was presented to the Council, and that the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to approving the proposed Project, as set forth below. As part of this certification, the Council hereby finds that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Council and approves the Final EIR.

II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
CEQA (PRC Section 21000 et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to consider the environmental consequences of projects for which they have discretionary authority. This document, which has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14 Section 15000 et seq.), sets forth the findings of the Town of Los Gatos (Town), the lead agency under CEQA, regarding the 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community project.

The primary source for this document is the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR; SCH #2021020007) for the proposed Project, and the documents that have been incorporated into the Final EIR directly or by reference. Full descriptions of the proposed Project, associated environmental impacts, mitigation measures, Project alternatives, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the proposed Project, and other features required under CEQA are contained in the Final EIR itself.

To determine the scope of the EIR, the Town prepared a Notice of Preparation. On February 4, 2021, the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed Project were distributed to trustee and responsible agencies, members of the public, other interested parties, and the California Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse. This began the 30-day public review period, which ended on March 8, 2021. These comments were considered during the preparation of the Draft EIR (see below) and are included in their entirety in Appendix A to that document.

The Draft EIR, with an accompanying Notice of Completion (NOC), was circulated to the State Clearinghouse, trustee agencies, responsible agencies, other government agencies, and interested members of the public for a 45-day review period, extending from May 28, 2021 through July 12, 2021. On June 23, 2021, the Town of Los Gatos Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive oral comment on the Draft EIR.

Page 188 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR 2 Draft – February 2025
Comments on the Draft EIR, a list of commenters, and the Town’s responses to comments are contained in the Final EIR, dated August 2021. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15088(b), the Final EIR was made available for review by trustee and responsible agencies that provided written comments on the Draft EIR for a 10-day period from September 3, 2021 through September 13, 2021
The Final EIR for the Project consists of the following:

A. Draft Environmental Impact Report (“Draft EIR”), issued May 28, 2021; B. All appendices to the Draft EIR;
C. Final EIR, dated August 2021, containing all written comments and responses on the Draft EIR, refinements and clarifications to the Draft EIR, the MMRP, and technical appendices;
D. All of the comments and staff responses entered into the record orally and in writing, as well as accompanying technical memoranda or evidence entered into the record.

The Final EIR did not provide any significant new information regarding proposed Project or cumulative impacts or mitigation measures beyond that contained in the Draft EIR.

In conformance with CEQA, the Town has taken the following actions in relation to the EIR:

A. On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing on the Project and the EIR, and recommended that the Town Council certify the EIR and approve the redevelopment of the 10.84-acre site with a senior living community that would replace the existing Los Gatos Meadows senior living community. The project would include 187 independent residential apartments plus 24 supporting care units. The project, a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC), would be licensed as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) under the California Department of Social Services. The project would be restricted to persons age 62 and older and would provide 24/7 assisted living services to the residents. The project would provide coordinated health care services, including 24 supporting care units. These proposed services would be similar to the use offered in the previous community.

B. On February 4, 2025, at a duly and properly noticed public hearing, the Town Council certified the EIR and adopted findings, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program related to the Planned Development application filed by the applicant requesting a “Planned Development” overlay be applied to the site’s existing “Residential Planned Development” zoning designation.

Page 189 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 3
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Project Location and Current Use
The project site is located at 110 Wood Road in the Town of Los Gatos. The property is accessed directly off Wood Road (via South Santa Cruz Avenue). The project site’s Assessor’s parcel number is 510-47-038, and is generally located between single family residences along Broadway to the northeast and Wood Road to the south. The site is zoned “Residential Planned Development (R:PD)” and has a General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential. The General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential allows for a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre. A senior living community has been operating on the site since 1971 with 10 residential buildings and other support facilities and amenities. The site has three access points: two from the south off of Wood Road and one from the north via a driveway (referred to as Farwell Lane) connecting with Broadway. The facility has been closed since February 2019, after a rigorous facilities assessment concluded that continuing operations of the facility in its present form presented too great a risk to its residents. Although the facility has completed the closure process, the facility continues to be staffed to provide on-going maintenance and security of the property.

B. Project Objectives
The objective of the proposed project is to approve a new/updated Planned Development (PD) to rebuild a state-of-the art senior living community on a 10.84-acre site consistent with the Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan, Town of Los Gatos zoning code and in the spirit of the Town of Los Gatos Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines.

C. Project Characteristics
The Project applicant is requesting approval of the following:
 Planned Development (PD) Overlay permit (PD-20-001)
A Planned Development application has been filed by the applicant requesting a “Planned Development” overlay be applied to the site’s existing “Residential Planned Development” zoning designation. A subsequent Architecture and Site application will be required if the Planned Development application is approved by the Town Council. In accordance with Town Code Section 29.20.140(d), the Architecture and Site approval is required for purposes of approving the development plan for the new senior living community to ensure conformance with Town regulations related to the height, width, shape, proportion, siting, exterior construction and design of buildings and to ensure that they are architecturally compatible with their surroundings.

IV. SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The Final EIR analyzed proposed Project impacts in the following six environmental topic areas: Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Wildfire Hazards. With implementation of proposed Project-specific

Page 190 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR 4 Draft – February 2025
mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts would be reduced to less than significant impacts.

The following discussion elaborates on potentially significant impacts identified in the 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community Final EIR and mitigation measures proposed for those impacts.

A. Air Quality

1. Potentially Significant Impacts Reduced to Less Than Significant Levels Impact 6-5: Construction Activity Would Expose Sensitive Receptors to Toxic Air Contaminants
Sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of construction activities would be exposed to construction TAC emissions volumes that exceed the air district significance thresholds for infant/child cancer risks and PM2.5 concentrations. These are significant impacts.

Implementation of the following Mitigation Measures would reduce the impact to a less-thansignificant level.

Mitigation Measures:

Mitigation Measure 6-5a During construction, the project contractor shall implement the following measures to reduce emissions of fugitive dust and engine exhaust DPM, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. These measures shall be included in the project plans, prior to issuance of a demolition permit:
a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered three (3) times per day and at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture of 12 percent. Moisture content can be verified by lab samples or moisture probe;
b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered;
c. Avoid tracking visible soil material on to public roadways by employing the following measures if necessary: (1) Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from public paved roads shall be treated with a 6 to 12-inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel and (2) washing truck tires and construction equipment prior to leaving the site;
d. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited;
e. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to five (5) mph; f. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used;
g. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five (5) minutes (as required by the California

Page 191 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 5
airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points;
h. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation; i. All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph and visible dust extends beyond site boundaries;
j. Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of construction adjacent to sensitive receptors. Wind breaks should have no greater than 50 percent air porosity;
k. Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast-germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established;
l. The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground-disturbing construction activities on the same area at any one time shall be limited. Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time; and m. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town of Los Gatos regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The air district’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

Mitigation Measure 6-5b Prior to the issuance of the demolition permit, the project developer shall prepare, and the project contractor shall implement, a demolition and construction emissions avoidance and reduction plan demonstrating a 78 percent reduction of DPM emissions and a 60 percent reduction of PM2.5 exposures at the MEI to meet the air district’s risk thresholds.

The plan shall be prepared prior to the issuance of a demolition permit and shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. The plan shall be accompanied by a letter signed by a qualified air quality specialist, verifying the equipment included in the plan meets the standards set forth in this mitigation measure. The plan shall include the following measures:
a. All mobile diesel-powered off-road equipment operating on-site for more than two days and larger than 50 horsepower shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) particulate matter emissions standards for Tier III engines or better. Prior to the issuance of any demolition permits, the project applicant shall submit specifications of the equipment to be used during construction and confirmation this requirement is met;
b. Use alternatively fueled equipment or equipment with zero emissions (i.e., aerial lifts, forklifts, and air compressors, etc., shall be either electrified or fueled by liquefied natural gas/propane);
c. Provide line power to the site during the early phases of construction to minimize the use of diesel-powered stationary equipment, such as generators; and d. Other demonstrable measures identified by the developer that reduce emissions and avoid or minimize exposures to the affected sensitive receptors.

Page 192 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR 6 Draft – February 2025
Finding
All of the proposed Project specific environmental impacts on air quality will be reduced to less than significant with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures.

Mitigation Measures: 6-5a and 6-5b
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR.

B. Biological Resources

1. Potentially Significant Impacts Reduced to Less Than Significant Levels Impact 7-2: Potential Effect on Candidate, Sensitive, or Special-Status Species (San Francisco Dusky-Footed Woodrat)
If San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat is present within the 0.3 acres of oak/bay woodland or

5.2 acres of mixed woodland within the proposed project impact area, loss or disturbance of woodrats due to midden removal during construction and fire safety activities would be a significant adverse environmental impact. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation Measure 7-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys for woodrat middens within the development footprint and fire defensible space. These surveys shall be conducted no more than 15 days prior to the start of construction. In the event that construction activities are suspended for 15 consecutive days or longer, these surveys shall be repeated. All woodrat middens shall be flagged for avoidance of direct construction impacts and fire defensible space where feasible.

If impacts cannot be avoided, woodrat middens shall be dismantled no more than three days prior to construction activities starting at each midden location. All vegetation and duff materials shall be removed from three feet around the midden prior to dismantling so that the occupants do not attempt to rebuild. Middens are to be slowly dismantled by hand in order to allow any occupants to disperse.

Developers shall be responsible for implementation of this mitigation measure with oversight by the Town of Los Gatos. Compliance with this measure shall be documented by a qualified biologist and submitted to the Town, prior to issuance of a demolition and grading permit.

Impact 7-3. Potential Effect on Candidate, Sensitive, or Special-Status Species (Pallid Bat, Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat)
Potential habitat for pallid bat and Townsend’s big-eared bat occurs in mature, hollow trees and around structures present within the project site. If special-status bats are present on the site, tree removal and other construction activities could result in the loss of individual animals. This would be a significant adverse environmental impact. Implementation of the

Page 193 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 7
following mitigation measure would reduce the potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation Measure 7-3 Within 14 days prior to tree removal or other construction activities such as a demolition, the project developer shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a habitat assessment for bats and potential roosting sites in trees to be removed, within structures proposed for demolition, and in trees and structures within 50 feet of the development footprint. In the event that construction activities are suspended for 15 consecutive days or longer, these surveys shall be repeated. These surveys shall include a visual inspection of potential roosting features (bats need not be present) and a search for presence of guano within and 50 feet around the project site. Cavities, crevices, exfoliating bark, and bark fissures that could provide suitable potential nest or roost habitat for bats shall be surveyed. Assumptions can be made on what species is present due to observed visual characteristics along with habitat use, or the bats can be identified to the species level with the use of a bat echolocation detector such as an “Anabat” unit. Potential roosting features found during the survey shall be flagged or marked. Locations off the site to which access is not available may be surveyed from within the site or from public areas.

If no roosting sites or bats are found, a letter report confirming absence shall be submitted by the biologist to the Town of Los Gatos prior to issuance of tree removal and demolition permits and no further mitigation is required.

If bats or roosting sites are found, a letter report and supplemental documents shall be provided by the biologist to the Town of Los Gatos prior to issuance of tree removal and demolition permits and the following monitoring, exclusion, and habitat replacement measures shall be implemented:
a. If bats are found roosting outside of the nursery season (May 1 through October 1), they shall be evicted as described under (b) below. If bats are found roosting during the nursery season, they shall be monitored to determine if the roost site is a maternal roost. This could occur by either visual inspection of the roost bat pups, if possible, or by monitoring the roost after the adults leave for the night to listen for bat pups. If the roost is determined to not be a maternal roost, then the bats shall be evicted as described under (b) below. Because bat pups cannot leave the roost until they are mature enough, eviction of a maternal roost cannot occur during the nursery season. Therefore, if a maternal roost is present, a 50-foot buffer zone (or different size if determined in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife) shall be established around the roosting site within which no construction activities including tree removal or structure disturbance shall occur until after the nursery season.
b. If a non-breeding bat hibernaculum is found in a tree or snag scheduled for removal or on any structures within 50 feet of project disturbance activities, the individuals shall be safely evicted, under the direction of a qualified bat biologist. If preconstruction surveys determine that there are bats present in any trees or structures to be removed, exclusion structures (e.g. one-way doors or similar methods) shall be installed by a qualified biologist. The exclusion structures shall not be placed until the time of year in which young are able to fly, outside of the nursery

Page 194 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR 8 Draft – February 2025
season. Information on placement of exclusion structures shall be provided to the CDFW prior to construction. If needed, other removal methods could include:
carefully opening the roosting area in a tree or snag by hand to expose the cavity and opening doors/windows on structures, or creating openings in walls to allow light into the structures. Removal of any trees or snags and disturbance within 50 feet of any structures shall be conducted no earlier than the following day (i.e., at least one night shall be provided between initial roost eviction disturbance and tree removal/disturbance activities). This action will allow bats to leave during dark hours, which increases their chance of finding new roosts with a minimum of potential predation.
c. Bat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. If roosting habitat is identified, a Bat Mitigation and Monitoring plan will be prepared and implemented to mitigate for the loss of roosting habitat. The plan will include information pertaining to the species of bat and location of the roost, compensatory mitigation for permanent impacts, including specific mitigation ratios and a location of the proposed mitigation area, and monitoring to assess bat use of mitigation areas. The plan will be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to the bat eviction activities or the removal of roosting habitat.

Developers shall be responsible for implementation of this mitigation measure with oversight by the Town of Los Gatos. Compliance with this measure shall be documented and submitted to the Town, prior to issuance of grading and demolition permits.

Impact 7-4: Potential Effect on Candidate, Sensitive, or Special-Status Species (Nesting Raptors and Migratory Birds)
If nesting birds protected by state and federal regulations are present on or adjacent to the site during construction activities including vegetation removal and site preparation including building demolition, the proposed project may directly result in loss of active nests, or indirectly result in nest abandonment and thereby cause loss of fertile eggs or nestlings. This would be a significant adverse environmental impact. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the potential impact to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation Measure 7-4 Prior to issuance of tree removal, demolition, and grading permits, to avoid impacts to nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through September 15), construction activities within or adjacent to the project site boundary that include any tree or vegetation removal, demolition, or ground disturbance (such as grading or grubbing) shall be conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird nesting season. If this type of construction occurs during the bird nesting season, then a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting birds to ensure that no nests would be disturbed during project activities.

If project-related work is scheduled during the nesting season (February 15 to August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15 for owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), or if construction activities are suspended for at least 14 days and recommence during the nesting season, a qualified biologist shall conduct nesting bird surveys.

Page 195 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 9
a. Two surveys for active bird nests shall occur within 14 days prior to start of construction, with the final survey conducted within 48 hours prior to construction.

Appropriate minimum survey radii surrounding each work area are typically 250 feet for passerines, 500 feet for smaller raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors.

Surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities. Locations off the site to which access is not available may be surveyed from within the site or from public areas. A report documenting survey results and plan for active bird nest avoidance (if needed) shall be completed by the qualified biologist prior to initiation of construction activities. b. If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in nearby surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active construction shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each nest to characterize “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which allows the birds to exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nesting birds daily during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds show signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g. defensive flights and vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and/or flying away from the nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, the qualified biologist or construction foreman shall have the authority to cease all construction work in the area until the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active.

Impact 7-5: Effect on Federally- and State-Protected Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. (Intermittent or Ephemeral Drainage)
The Town of Los Gatos General Plan 2020 requires for all development to “protect wetlands and riparian corridors, including intermittent and ephemeral streams.” The on-site drainage feature may also fall under the jurisdiction of the USACE, RWQCB, and/or CDFW. Impacts to jurisdictional wetland and waterway features are considered significant adverse environmental impacts. The following mitigation measures would assure that this potentially significant impact is reduced to less than significant.

Mitigation Measures 7-5a To avoid impacts to a the potentially jurisdictional drainage feature, a minimum 10-foot setback from the drainage shall be maintained during tree removal, demolition, and construction activities. The drainage and setback area shall be shown on all demolition and construction plans.

Mitigation Measure 7-5b If disturbance will occur within ten feet of the drainage, prior to issuance of a grading permit within the project boundary, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to determine the extent of potential wetlands and waterways regulated by the USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW. If the USACE claims jurisdiction, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to obtain a Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit. If the impacts to the drainage features do not qualify for a Nationwide Permit, the applicant shall proceed

Page 196 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

CEQA Findings of Fact Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community EIR 10 Draft – February 2025
with the qualified biologist in obtaining an Individual Permit from the USACE. The applicant shall then retain a qualified biologist to coordinate with the RWQCB to obtain a Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification. If necessary, the applicant shall also retain a qualified biologist to coordinate with the CDFW to obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement.

To compensate for temporary and/or permanent impacts to Waters of the U.S. that would be impacted as a result of the proposed project, mitigation shall be provided as required by the regulatory permits. Mitigation would be provided through one of the following mechanisms:
 A Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be developed that will outline mitigation and monitoring obligations for temporary impacts to wetlands and other waters as a result of construction activities. The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan would include thresholds of success, monitoring and reporting requirements, and site-specific plans to compensate for wetland losses resulting from the project.

The Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the appropriate regulatory agencies for review and approval during the permit application process.  To compensate for permanent impacts, the purchase and/or dedication of land to provide suitable wetland restoration or creation shall ensure a no net loss of wetland values or functions. If restoration is available and feasible, a minimum 1:1 mitigation to impact ratio would apply to projects for which mitigation is provided in advance.

Impact 7-6: Damage or Removal of Regulated Trees
The Arborist Report Update re-evaluated the potential impacts to trees as a result of the project as shown on the Planning Submittal Set (10/8/2020) and the Preliminary Drainage Plan (6/30/2020). The disposition of each tree is shown in the exhibit attached to the Arborist Report Update, and summarized in Table 7-3, Trees Planned for Removal and Preservation, below.

Table 7-3 Trees Planned for Removal and Preservation
Protected Large Protected Total
Trees Planned for
Removal
205 8 213
Trees Planned for
Preservation
109 9 118
Source: HortScience | Bartlett Consulting 2020
The proposed project could remove up to 213 regulated trees. This would be a significant potential adverse environmental impact. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the potential impact to a less-than significant level.

Page 197 ends

ITEM NO. 9.

Town of Los Gatos I 110 Wood Road – Los Gatos Meadows Senior Living Community CEQA Findings of Fact Draft – February 2025 11
Mitigation Measure 7-6 Prior to issuance of a tree removal permit and/or a grading permit, developers shall retain a certified arborist to develop a site-specific tree protection plan for retained trees and supervise the implementation of all proposed tree preservation and protection measures during construction activities, including those measures specified in the 2018 project arborist report and 2020 arborist report update (HortScience Bartlett Consulting). Also, in accordance with the Town’s Tree Protection Ordinance, the developer shall obtain a tree removal permit for proposed tree removals on each development lot prior to tree removals and shall install replacement trees in accordance with all mitigation, maintenance, and monitoring requirements specified in the tree removal permit(s) or otherwise required by the Town for project approvals.

Impact 7-8: Effect on Sensitive Natural Communities
Sensitive natural communities potentially present on the site are limited to highly impacted drainage channels and oak woodland. Prior mitigation measures require the developer to determine the extent of potentially regulated drainage channels and regulated trees prior to initiation of ground disturbance or construction activities. To compensate for temporary and/or permanent impacts, mitigation shall be provided as required by regulatory permits.

No additional mitigation measures are necessary.

General Plan policies ENV-1.5 and ENV-1.7 prohibit the use of invasive species listed by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) for all new construction and requires new development to use native plants or other appropriate non-invasive plants to reduce maintenance and irrigation costs and the disturbance of adjacent natural habitat. The spread of invasive species is considered a significant potential impact. The following mitigation measure would assure that this potentially significant impact is reduced to less than significant.

Mitigation Measure 7-8 On-site landscaping shall be limited to drought-tolerant species, fire-resistant species, and species capable of increasing soil stability; with preference to plant species endemic to Santa Clara County. Species from the California Invasive Plant Council’s (Cal-IPC) Invasive Plant Inventory (Cal-IPC 2020) shall be removed if present and not included in any new landscaping.

The plant palette used for on-site landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Los Gatos to confirm no invasive species shall be planted. Evidence of compliance shall be submitted to the Town of Los Gatos prior to occupancy of the residential buildings.

Page 198 ends

Los Gatos City CouncilFebruary 4, 2025

Los Gatos City Council
February 4, 2025