Malibu City Council
April 13, 2026

3.3.5.3 Adaptive Capacity to Flooding
Due to the coastal flooding and erosion impacts that have occurred in Malibu, numerous adaptation strategies have already been implemented to reduce vulnerabilities to coastal hazards along the City’s 256

57 shoreline. Numerous beach nourishment projects have been completed in Malibu including Las Tunas Beach (1960-1974) and Zuma Beach (1979). Coastal armoring structures such as seawalls and rock revetments cover approximately 31 percent of the coastline in Malibu. Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors regularly construct temporary beach sand berms to reduce winter flooding of the lifeguard facilities, restrooms, and maintenance yard in the Zuma Beach parking lots.110

3.3.6 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS
In the context of climate change vulnerability, increased liquefaction (seismic) and heightened possibility of landslide (geologic) events are a concern. Both hazards are an indirect effect of increased precipitation and rising groundwater because soil must be saturated with water for liquefaction or landslides to occur. Both hazards can be triggered by seismic events such as earthquakes. Specifically:
• Liquefaction occurs when seismic energy shakes an area with low-density, fine grain soil, like sand or silt, which is also saturated with water. When the shaking motion reaches these areas, it can cause these loosely packed soils to suddenly compact, making the waterlogged sediment behave more like a liquid than solid ground.
• Landslides occur when earth on slopes becomes destabilized, typically after heavy rains, when the precipitation saturates the soil and makes it less stable, or when significant erosion from rainfall destabilizes the ground. Slopes that have recently burned face a greater risk from raininduced landslides, as the fires burn the trees, brush, and other vegetation that help stabilize the earth.

Seismic Activity
Changes in the climate do not have a direct effect on seismic activity. However, seismic events such as an earthquake can cause liquefaction and landslides which are made worse by other conditions caused by climate change.
111 California is seismically active because of movement of the North American Plate, east of the San Andreas Fault, and the Pacific Plate to the west, which includes the State’s coastal communities. The transform (parallel) movement of these tectonic plates against one another creates stresses that build as the rocks are gradually deformed. The rock deformation, or strain, is stored in the rocks as elastic strain energy. When the strength of the rock is exceeded, rupture occurs along a fault.

The Las Virgenes-Malibu area is exposed to six major regional faults as illustrated in Table. 3-10 Malibu Faults.112
110 City of Malibu Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment. 2023 111 Liquefaction occurs when seismic energy shakes an area with low-density, fine grain soil, like sand or silt, which is also saturated with water. When the shaking motion reaches these areas, it can cause these loosely packed soils to suddenly compact, making the waterlogged sediment behave more like a liquid than solid ground. During liquefaction events, the liquified soil can lose most of its stability which can cause damage to buildings and infrastructure built upon it. In severe cases, some buildings may completely collapse. Pipelines or other utility lines running through a liquefaction zone can be breached during an event, potentially leading to flooding or release of hazardous materials. 112 Las Virgenes-Malibu Council of Governments Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2023 257

58 Table 3.10 Malibu Faults
Fault Map
Code Fault Name
Probable
Magnitude Length
Distance
to
LVMCOG
Direction
from the
LVMCOG
MB Malibu Coast Fault 6.0 – 7.0 Mw 21.1 miles 0 miles S SM Santa Monica Fault 6.0 – 7.0 Mw 15.0 miles 10 miles SE PVZ Palos Verdes Fault Zone 6.0 – 7.0 Mw 49.7 miles 4 miles S SSRZ Simi-Santa Rosa Fault Zone 6.5 – 7.0 Mw 24.9 miles 8 miles NW SMFZ Sierra Madre Fault Zone 6.0 – 7.0 Mw Mw 46.6 miles 10 miles N/NE RY Raymond Fault 6.0 – 7.0 Mw 16.2 miles 25 miles E
Historical Earthquake, Landslide, and Liquefaction Events • January 1, 1979 – Heavy rain triggered a massive landslide, destroying homes and damaging infrastructure along PCH. Remains one of Malibu’s most costly natural disasters. • January 17, 1994 – Northridge Earthquake (M6.7). Although centered in the San Fernando Valley, this powerful quake caused notable shaking in Malibu, leading to structural damage and highlighting the region's seismic vulnerability.
• September 12, 2024 – Malibu Earthquake (M4.7) A magnitude 4.7 earthquake struck near Malibu, felt across Los Angeles County. While no major damage was reported, it raised concerns about increasing seismic activity in the area. • March 9, 2025 – Malibu Earthquake (M4.1) A magnitude 4.1 earthquake hit near Malibu, contributing to a pattern of increased seismic activity in Southern California.

3.3.6.1 Exposure to Geologic and Seismic Hazards
Figure 3-8: Liquefaction Susceptibility highlights areas with potential for liquefaction. The underlying dataset combines existing liquefaction areas from local maps and the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program which rates soils from hard to soft and known hydric soils from the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey to identify the potential areas where liquefaction may occur.

Table 3-11: Liquefaction Susceptibility – Vulnerable Populations illustrates the populations within liquefaction hazard zones within the City. Of special concern to the City is that almost 50 percent of households have at least one person aged 65 and over in addition to 12 percent of households with at least one person living with a disability. While the data may represent the same households, the number of individuals within the liquefaction susceptibility zones should be of special concern for the City when preparing for emergency events including evacuation. 258

59 Figure 3-8: Liquefaction Susceptibility

259

60 Table 3-11: Liquefaction Susceptibility – Vulnerable Populations Liquefaction City of Malibu Total Population1 1,833 10,366
Percent of residents that are children (less than 10 years old) 2 5.3% 6.0%
Percent of households that have people 65+ years old1 49.6% 49.3% Percentage of households with at least one person living with a disability1 12.2% 14.6% Median age2 52.2 51.0
Total households1 943 4,498
Median household income2 $148,846 $200,001
Percent of rental households2 37.8% 29.1%
Percent of household income below poverty level1 11.1% 7.7% Source: US Census Bureau, ACS 2018 - 20221, ESRI Forecasts 20242 Landslides
Landslides occur when earth on slopes becomes destabilized, typically after heavy rains, when the precipitation saturates the soil and makes it less stable, or when significant erosion from rainfall destabilizes the ground. Slopes that have recently burned face a greater risk from rain-induced landslides as the fires burn the trees, brush, and other vegetation that help stabilize the earth. In general, landslide hazard areas are where the land has characteristics that contribute to the risk of the downhill movement of material, such as the following:
• A slope greater than 33 percent.
• A history of landslide activity or movement during the last 10,000 years. • Stream or wave activity, which has caused erosion, undercut a bank, or cut into a bank to cause the surrounding land to be unstable.
• The presence of an alluvial fan (a triangle-shaped deposit of gravel, sand, and even smaller pieces of sediment, such as silt) indicates vulnerability to the flow of debris or sediments. • The presence of impermeable soils, such as silt or clay, which are mixed with granular soils such as sand and gravel.

Earthquakes may also be a source of landslides as the shaking can destabilize already loosened soil.

There is the potential for landslides in the steeper portions of the foothills of the City. These areas are characterized with steep topography and geologic units that can become unstable. Figure 3-9:

Earthquake Induced Landslide Zone identifies the areas of the City that are considered vulnerable to seismic induced landslides.

3.3.6.2 Sensitivity to Geologic and Seismic Hazards
Liquefaction and Landslides
As climate change is anticipated to change the usual precipitation patterns in California, periods of both rain and drought are expected to become more intense and frequent. Therefore, climate change could, depending on the circumstances, increase the future risk of liquefaction in the region. 260

61 Figure 3-9: Earthquake Induced Landslide Zone
261

62 Table 3-12: Landslide Susceptibility – Vulnerable Populations Landslide City of Malibu Total Population1 2,040 10,366
Percent of residents that are children (less than 10 years old)2 5.2% 6.0% Percent of households that have people 65+ years old1 45.9% 49.3% Percentage of households with at least one person living with a disability1 11.6% 14.6% Median age2 48.8 51.0
Total households1 856 4,498
Median household income2 $148,846 $200,001
Percent of rental households2 23.2% 29.1%
Percent of household income below poverty level1 3.9% 7.7% Source: US Census Bureau, ACS 2018 - 20221, ESRI Forecasts 20242 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
During liquefaction events, the liquified soil can lose its stability which can cause damage to buildings and infrastructure built upon it. In severe cases, buildings may completely collapse. (See Figure 3-8:

Liquefaction Zones and Figure 3-9: Earthquake Induced Landslide Zone). • Roads—Access to major roads is crucial after a disaster event. Services and mobility may be disrupted during and following a liquefaction event. Sidewalks, roadways, and pipelines may become fractured and disjointed because of the liquefying soils. Roads and sidewalks may be usable in some form, but a severe liquefaction event may render them impassable until they are repaired. Landslides may block roadways causing long-term disruptions to the roadway network, infrastructure systems and public agency capabilities. • Bridges — Earthquake shaking, liquefaction and landslides can significantly damage bridges, which often provide the only access to some neighborhoods. Since soft soil regions generally follow floodplain boundaries, those bridges that cross water courses are considered vulnerable. Key factors in the degree of vulnerability are the facility’s age and type of construction and soil classification at the bridge support structure, which indicate the standards to which the facility was built.
• Water and sewer infrastructure — Water and sewer infrastructure would likely suffer considerable damage in the event of an earthquake. This factor is difficult to analyze based on the vast amount of infrastructure and because water and sewer infrastructure are usually linear easements. Without further analysis of individual system components, it should be assumed that these systems are exposed to breakage and failure. Distribution systems with older brittle pipes are vulnerable to shaking and liquefaction. • Power Lines — Power lines are generally elevated above steep slopes but the towers supporting them can be subject to landslides. A landslide could trigger failure of the soil underneath a tower, causing it to collapse and ripping down the lines.

Hazardous Materials
Utility lines running through a liquefaction zone can be breached during an event, potentially leading to flooding or the release of hazardous materials. The shaking of the ground can also damage or destroy underground utilities or pipelines, potentially leading to releases of hazardous materials as 262

63 well as flooding if water lines are breached. The sinking of the ground could also reduce the distance to the groundwater table, which could raise the risk of contamination from hazardous materials.

Economic Elements
Homes, schools, and public facilities may be damaged and would likely be rendered unsafe for occupancy if they experience any leaning or structural damage resulting from the liquefaction or landslides. In addition to potentially causing significant injuries or fatalities, this can cause economic harm and create a need for long-term emergency sheltering and temporary housing until these buildings can be reconstructed.

In consideration of future degradation of structures, the City will want to monitor the quality of older housing stock to ensure it is still safe in a liquefaction event. The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development may consider units substandard if they were built before 1940.

Natural Resource Areas
Earthquake-induced landslides in landslide-prone areas can significantly damage surrounding habitat.

It is also possible for streams to be rerouted after an earthquake. Rerouting can change the water quality, possibly damaging habitat and feeding areas. There is a possibility that streams fed by groundwater wells will dry up because of changes in underlying geology. Landslides could affect sensitive ecological areas around the community, causing localized harm to the region’s ecosystem, although widespread impacts are unlikely.

Vulnerable Populations
Similar to liquefaction impacts, the same concerns apply to those households with residents aged 65 and older or have a disability, as there may exist challenges with mobility that may affect evacuation and response to a catastrophic event.

3.3.6.3 Adaptive Capacity Geologic and Seismic Hazards
The City has addressed liquefaction and landslide events in planning documents such as the Las Virgenes-Malibu Council of Governments Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2023 and other agency programs. The City also has regulations and programs in place that are beneficial during liquefaction and landslide events by limiting further potential public health impacts. • City of Malibu Zoning and Building Code: In addition to the above referenced policies, the City of Malibu Zoning and Building Codes address development regarding grading, drainage, general building guidelines on slopes, as well as Geotechnical Engineering Standards. • City of Malibu Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan and Local Implementation Plan: The City of Malibu Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (LUP) and Local Implementation Plan (LIP) adopted by the California Coastal Commission (9/13/2002) includes policies to minimize the hazards associated with shoreline and bluff development including slope stability and landslide potential in hillside areas.113
113 Las Virgenes-Malibu Council of Governments Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2023 263

64 CHAPTER 4. MALIBU HAZARD

VULNERABILITY EVALUATION

4.1 EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
The California Adaptation Planning Guide (APG) defines vulnerability as a function of exposure plus sensitivity minus adaptive capacity.
• Exposure: the degree to which Malibu’s people, assets, and ecosystems are in harm’s way. • Sensitivity: how strongly those assets or populations are affected once exposed. • Adaptive Capacity: the ability of systems, institutions, and communities to adjust, respond, or recover.

4.2 HAZARD VULNERABILITY OUTCOME
Using this lens, Malibu’s major hazards are evaluated qualitatively below.

Wildfire
Malibu is situated within the wildland–urban interface, making residential neighborhoods, utilities, and transportation routes highly exposed. Sensitivity is elevated due to steep topography, high density of fuels, reliance on a limited evacuation network (Pacific Coast Highway), and the presence of vulnerable populations. Adaptive capacity includes defensible space programs, evacuation planning, and outreach, but capacity is constrained by infrastructure, limited ingress-egress, and reliance on regional firefighting.

Overall Vulnerability: HIGH.

Coastal Flooding and Sea-Level Rise
Homes, beaches, and transportation corridors (especially PCH) are directly exposed. Sensitivity is acute for properties on narrow beaches and low-lying infrastructure. Proactive adaptive capacity exists in Malibu’s Local Coastal Program development policies, but hard infrastructure solutions are costly and controversial, and relocation options are limited.

Overall Vulnerability: HIGH.

Storm Events and Flooding
On-shore precipitation events can trigger flooding, debris flows, and landslides (See Liquefaction and Landslides). In areas susceptible to 100-year flood events, roads and structures are the most likely to be affected. Adaptive capacity includes storm drains and building codes to reduce flooding impacts.

Overall Vulnerability: MODERATE.

Extreme Heat
Heat events affect residents, visitors, and outdoor workers. Older adults and low-income households without cooling systems are particularly sensitive. Adaptive capacity is moderate; Malibu’s coastal 264

65 climate provides some protection, but inland canyons experience greater intensity and cooling centers are limited.

Overall Vulnerability: MODERATE.

Drought and Water Supply Stress
Malibu relies heavily on imported water supplies, making it sensitive to regional drought conditions.

Local ecosystems such as creeks and chaparral are highly sensitive. Adaptive capacity includes water conservation measures, but diversification options like desalination are limited.

Overall Vulnerability: MODERATE.

Liquefaction and Landslides
Liquefaction potential is high near the coast and canyon such as Ramirez Canyon and Zuma Canyon.

While high, building codes are intended to reduce the impact and therefore overall vulnerability is low.

Landslides vulnerability is highest after high precipitation events when occurring after fires and large erosion events. Intense winter storms can trigger flooding, debris flows, and landslides on eroded or burned hillsides. Infrastructure, homes, and roads (especially canyon roads) are exposed. Sensitivity is high due to steep terrain and soil instability post-fire. Adaptive capacity includes storm drains and slope stabilization, but geology and cost constrain effectiveness. While vulnerability is high after a fire and storm event, as these are specific situations, overall vulnerability is considered moderate.

Overall Vulnerability: MODERATE.

Table 4.1: Hazard Vulnerability Matrix
Hazard Exposure &
Sensitivity
Adaptive
Capacity
Overall
Vulnerability
Wildfire Very High Moderate High
Coastal Flooding/Sea-Level Rise High Low–Moderate High
Storms/On-Shore Flooding Moderate High Moderate
Extreme Heat Moderate Moderate Moderate
Drought/Water Supply High Moderate Moderate
Liquefaction and Landslide Moderate Moderate Moderate

Conclusion
The hazards that present the highest vulnerabilities for Malibu are wildfire and coastal flooding/sealevel rise, as they combine high exposure and sensitivity with adaptive capacity constraints. Drought and storm-related hazards represent moderate vulnerabilities, depending on climate intensification and water supply constraints. Extreme heat is moderate, buffered somewhat by Malibu’s coastal setting but still a concern for inland and sensitive populations. 265
Exhibit G
Safety Element Update - Changes to Existing City of Malibu Safety and Health Element KEY to Third Column:

Kept– These remain as is, sometimes with minor text changes for clarity/consistency.

Modified – These were revised to reflect current conditions or updated priorities. In some cases, a policy has been modified into an implementation action or incorporated in an existing or new policy developed in the element, or an objective has been modified into a policy.

Removed – These were removed from the element as they may no longer apply to the City, are addressed in a different General Plan Element, or are better suited in other documents outside of the Safety Element or General Plan.

Existing G/P/O/IM # Existing Text Safety Element Update - Kept/Removed/Modified S Goal 1. A Community that is Free From all Avoidable Risks to Safety, Health and Welfare from Natural and Man-Made Hazards.

Removed and addressed by the following new goals: GOAL S-1: A Community Better Prepared for Future Emergencies; Goal S-3: A Community Better Prepared to Address the Risks from Natural Hazards; and Goal S-4: A Community Better Protected Against Human-Caused Hazards (Hazardous Materials Release).

S Objective 1.1
Losses to life and property from natural
and man-made hazards greatly reduced
from historic levels.

Removed and addressed by Objective S-1.1 and Policies
S-1.1, S-1.2, and S1.3, as well as multiple objectives and policies under Goals S-3 and S-4.

S Policy 1.1.1 The City shall protect people and
property from environmental hazards.

Removed and addressed by Policies S-1.1.1, S-1.1.2, S3.3.1 and Objectives S-3.1, S-3.2, S-3.3, S.4.1.

S Policy 1.1.2 The City shall minimize the risk of loss from fire. Modified – see Policy S-3.3.1.

S Policy 1.1.3
The City shall reduce the amount of nonessential toxic and hazardous substances.

Removed and addressed by Policies S-4.1.1 and S-4.1.2
and Action S-4.2.1a.

S Policy 1.1.4 The City shall promote use of
alternatives to hazardous substances. Modified – see Action S-4.2.1a.

S Policy 1.1.5 The City shall reduce water pollution and improve Malibu's water quality.

Removed. The policy is addressed in the Land Use
Element as LU Policy 1.1.2 (The City shall ensure that
land uses avoid or minimize adverse impacts on water
266
Exhibit G
quality and other natural resources, such as undisturbed watershed and riparian areas) and LU Policy 1.1.3 (The
City shall control surface runoff into coastal waters,
wetlands, and riparian areas), and in the Circulation
Element as C Policy 2.1.2. (The City shall strive to
ensure uses within Malibu’s Planning Area are consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the Malibu
community).

S Policy 1.1.6
The City shall reduce air pollution and
improve Malibu's air quality. The City
shall reduce air pollution and improve
Malibu's air quality.

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Policy 1.1.7 The City shall minimize the risks from
landslides and debris flows. Kept – see Policy S-3.1.1.

S Imp. Measure 1
Develop a master plan of fire prevention
and control identifying hazards,
assessing acceptable levels of cost and
risk and determining protection
programs.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.1a.

S Imp. Measure 2
Work with other agencies to ensure
effective and efficient fire suppression,
prevention and rescue services.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.13a.

S Imp. Measure 3
Encourage owners of swimming pools to
obtain gasoline powered pumps to use in
fire fighting.

Removed. Gas-powered pumps can be restricted for
environmental and air quality concerns, and the City’s
Fire Liaison has recommended it be removed. Issues of
fire-fighting are addressed in multiple actions under
Objective S-3.3.

S Imp. Measure 4
Establish programs and guidelines for
fire-safe landscaping including buffers
comprised of fire resistant vegetation
between residential areas and open
space areas and encourage use of firesafe landscaping principles which emphasize plant species with low fuel
volumes.

Modified – see Actions 3-3.3.1c, 3.3.1e, and 3.3.13a.

S Imp. Measure 5 Work with the Los Angeles County Fire Kept – see Action S-3.3.1d. 267
Exhibit G
Department to adopt a program for
controlled burning of combustible
vegetation, based on the
recommendations of the responsible
forestry and fire-protection official.

S Imp. Measure 6
Work with the Los Angeles County Fire
Department to enforce code
requirements for flammable brush
clearance, and reduction of flammable
vegetation, including both native plants
and ornamental landscaping.

Kept – see Action S-3.3.1e.

S Imp. Measure 7
Work with appropriate agencies to
assure sufficient stored water and
provide non-monetary incentives for onsite or area-wide shared storage water suitable for firefighting equal to one
gallon for each square foot of structural
floor area for all new development.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.1f.

S Imp. Measure 8
Work with the Los Angeles County Fire
Department to establish standards for
fire-fighting equipment access suitable
for Malibu.

Kept – Action S-3.3.1g.

S Imp. Measure 9
Create a major streets and routes plan
which includes streets available as
wildfire escape routes.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.1h.

S Imp. Measure 10 Require all new and remodel structures to have Class A fire-retardant roofing. Modified – see Action S-3.3.1i.

S Imp. Measure 11
Develop guidelines and standards for all
new and remodel structures to utilize fireresistant building materials and designs, and, if feasible, to be sited to minimize
fire hazards.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.1i.

S Imp. Measure 12
Provide South Coast Air Quality
Management District regional wind
patterns maps to homeowners, architects
and contractors to help them plan
Kept – see Action S-3.3.1j.
268
Exhibit G
development siting and design that
minimizes fire hazards.

S Imp. Measure 13
Work with the Los Angeles County Fire
Department to provide on-site fire safety
inspections of individual homes, when
requested by resident or owner, and
advise homeowners on ways to minimize
fire hazards while maintaining slope
stability and appropriate vegetation.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.1k.

S Imp. Measure 14 Encourage and support arson and
neighborhood watch programs. Kept – see Action S-3.3.1l.

S Imp. Measure 15 Require that all camping be in
designated fire-safe camping areas.

Removed. This is something that should be addressed as
part of your municipal code, if not already.

S Imp. Measure 16
Develop a permanent, ongoing
homeowner watershed area
management plan to reduce fire hazards
while maintaining appropriate vegetation
that will stabilize the watershed and
control the flow of water from it.

Application of such plan in Resource
Protection Areas shall be subject to
review and approval for compliance with
resource protection requirements.

Kept – see Action S-3.3.1m.

S Imp. Measure 17
Work with water service providers to
identify neighborhoods with inadequate
flow from fire hydrants, and to upgrade
deteriorated and undersized waterdistribution systems.

Kept – see Action S-3.3.1n.

S Imp. Measure 18
Provide guidelines and incentives for use
of non-toxic building materials in new
and remodel construction.

Modified – see Action S-3.3.1i.

S Imp. Measure 19 Regulate the transport, storage and use of toxic and hazardous materials.

Modified – see Actions S-4.1.1a and S-4.1.1b and S4.2.1.a.

S Imp. Measure 20
Work with trash haulers and Los Angeles
County Fire Department to provide for
the proper collection and disposal of
Kept – see Action S-4.1.1a.
269
Exhibit G
hazardous wastes.

S Imp. Measure 21
Work with Los Angeles County Fire
Department to ensure compliance with
the Hazardous Materials Disclosure Law.

Kept – see Action S-4.1.1b.

S Imp. Measure 22
Establish a household hazardous waste
disposal program which enables
residents to bring material to a
centralized collection facility for proper
disposal.

Modified – see Policy S-4.1.2.

S Imp. Measure 23
Inform residents about the safe handling,
storage, use, disposal, and alternatives
to use of hazardous materials.

Modified – see Action S-4.2.1a.

S Imp. Measure 24
Seek federal, state and county
cooperation and funding to identify
potential historic hazardous waste
disposal sites and the availability of
funds for the removal of any wastes
discovered.

Modified – se Action S-4.2.1b.

S Imp. Measure 25
Initiate and work with other agencies to
assess trends in water quality and
establish water cleanliness standards
including a program of enforcement.

Removed and to be considered for addition to the
Conservation Element or Land Use Element. The Land
Use Element already address water quality to some
extent.

S Imp. Measure 26
Participate in efforts to identify and
eliminate sources of contamination when
unhealthful conditions are discovered in
creeks, lagoons, intertidal zones,
estuaries and wetlands.

Removed and to be considered for addition to the
Conservation Element or Land Use Element. The Land
Use Element already address water quality to some
extent.

S Imp. Measure 27
Require that all above ground discharges
and reuse of wastewater for small
volume treatment plants meet tertiary
treatment standards.

Removed and to be considered for addition to the
Conservation Element or Land Use Element. The Land
Use Element already address water quality to some
extent.

S Imp. Measure 28
Work with other agencies to monitor and
adopt receiving water quality standards
and update the City's receiving water
quality standards as more accurate
information becomes available.

Removed and to be considered for addition to the
Conservation Element or Land Use Element. The Land
Use Element already address water quality to some
extent.
270
Exhibit G
S Imp. Measure 29
Encourage the use of new wastewater
management technologies to achieve
maximum feasible reduction of
pathogens from wastewater prior to
release into the environment.

Removed and to be considered for addition to the
Conservation Element or Land Use Element. The Land
Use Element already address water quality to some
extent.

S Imp. Measure 30
Work with regional agencies to
implement the provisions of the South
Coast Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP).

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 31 Promote public education and
awareness of air quality.

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 32
Work with other agencies to reduce local
sources of air pollution such as dust,
smoke, and vehicle emissions.

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 33 Evaluate impacts on air quality in
connection with development proposals.

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 34
Encourage residents and visitors to
reduce the number of vehicle miles
traveled while in the City.

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 35
Provide information about the benefits of
native oxygen-producing plants,
consistent with fire safety, in order to
discourage removal.

Removed and to be considered for addition to
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 36
As funding becomes available, study
effects of excessive ground water on
surface erosion, earth movement, and
groundwater "daylighting."
Modified – see Policy S-3.1.3.e.

S Imp. Measure 37
Work with the residents of
neighborhoods affected by landslides
and debris flows to develop appropriate
risk abatement programs.

Kept – see Action S-3.1.1a.

S Imp. Measure 38
Develop a program of water budget
determinations by monitoring and
recording the contributions of
groundwater to local areas from uphill
septic tank effluent and water reuse
Removed. This is better addressed with the City’s water provider and not something that a Safety Element can
govern. If still desired, it should be considered for
inclusion in another element of the General Plan that
addresses public services.
271
Exhibit G
installations.

S Objective 1.2
Risks to residents and businesses from
development in hazardous areas are
minimized.

Removed and addressed by Policy S-3.1.

S Policy 1.2.1 The City shall require development to
provide for analyses of site safety related
to potential hazards of fault rupture,
earthquake ground shaking, liquefaction,
and rockfalls.

Modified and addressed in Policies 3.1.1 and 3.1.2. and

3.1.3, and in Actions S-3.1.3a and S-3.1.3b.

S Policy 1.2.2 The City shall require development to
provide site safety analyses related to
landsliding, debris flows, expansive soils,
collapsible soils, erosion/ sedimentation,
and groundwater effects.

Modified and addressed in Policies 3.1.1 and 3.1.2. and

3.1.3, and in Actions S-3.1.3a and S-3.1.3b.

S Policy 1.2.3 The City shall require development to
provide for safety from coastal storm
flooding, coastal erosion, surfacing septic
effluent, and tsunami.

Kept - see Policy S-3.6.1.

S Policy 1.2.4 The City shall require development to be consistent with minimum Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) guidelines for flood plain
management.

Kept – see Policy S-3.2.1.

S Imp. Measure 39: Develop and maintain a development
geo-hazard database to incorporate
findings from site specific and area
hazard-related studies.

Kept - Action S-1.1.2.a.

S Imp. Measure 40: Adopt and update as appropriate maps of extreme fire danger areas, 100-year
flood plains, landslide and debris flow
danger, active and potentially active
faults, tsunami, and any other hazard
areas; and inform residents of those
areas of risks and possible mitigation
measures.

Modified. Created separate hazard categories and
different actions. See also Policy S-3.3.2d. CAL FIRE
and FEMA create and maintain hazard maps.
272
Exhibit G
S Imp. Measure 41: Require that all new construction be designed to be earthquake resistant
to maximum probable earthquakes.

Modified – see Policy S-3.1.3.

S Imp. Measure 42: Apply all restrictions and investigation requirements mandated by the State
under the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zones Act for faults classified as "active"
to development on properties crossed by
or adjacent to the Malibu Coast Fault.

Kept – see Action S-3.1.3.a.

S Imp. Measure 43: Encourage area residents to
participate in National Flood
Insurance Program.

Kept – see Policy S-3.2.4.

S Imp. Measure 44: Design coastal development, except
supporting structure, to be above the
wave uprush level for storms within the
past 100 years, and above the 100-year
flood plain
Kept – see Action S-3.6.1a.

S Imp. Measure 45: Require that all critical use facilities (hospitals, police and fire stations) be
earthquake resistant designed for the
effects of a maximum credible
earthquake
Kept – see Policy S-3.1.4.

S Imp. Measure 46: As soon as feasible, complete coastal morphology studies and establish
shoreline construction standards.

Kept - see Action S-3.6.1b.

S Imp. Measure 47: To protect slope stability, restrict grading or development related vegetation
clearance where the slope exceeds 2:1,
except as required for fire safety,
driveways and utilities and where there is
no reasonable alternative.

Kept - see Action S-3.1.3c.

S Imp. Measure 48: As soon as feasible, complete a study on the effects of seawalls, groins and
revetments on beach erosion.

Modified – see Action S-3.6.1c.

S Imp. Measure 49: Require a coastal engineering report for all proposed revetments, seawalls, cliff Kept – see Action S-3.6.1e. 273
Exhibit G
retaining walls and other such
construction proposed to protect existing
structures to ensure that the structure is
constructed utilizing the least
environmentally damaging method.

S. Imp. Measure 50: Require that soils, geologic and
structural evaluation reports with
appropriate mitigation measures be
prepared by registered soils engineers,
engineering geologists, and/or structural
engineers and that all recommended
mitigation measures be implemented.

Kept - see Action S-3.1.3b.

S Imp. Measure 51: Evaluate proposed development for its impact on, and from, geologic hazards,
flood and mud flow hazard, and fire
hazard.

Modified. Created separate hazard categories and
multiple different actions to address.

S Imp. Measure 52: Require water efficient landscaping and irrigation in identified landslide sites to
minimize deep percolation in all areas
uphill from identified landslides.

Modified – see Action S-3.1.3d.

S Imp. Measure 53: Require that proposed coastal
development exposed to ocean waters,
including but not limited to potentially
heavy tidal or wave action, be sited
landward of state-owned tidelands and
be further sited so as not to cause a
potential nuisance, hazard to navigation,
public safety problem, or interference
with the public's right in the navigable
waters.

Kept – see ActionS-3.6.1d.

S Objective 1.3 An ongoing, permanent program for
cooperating with other jurisdictions,
agencies, and public and private
organizations to help meet the goals of
the safety and health element.

Removed. This has been replaced with several different
hazard categories and policies to address
cooperation/coordination.
274
Exhibit G
S Policy 1.3.1:

The City shall strive to ensure uses
within Malibu's Planning Area are
consistent with the safety, health and
welfare of the Malibu community.

Removed. Not necessary to be covered in the Safety
Element, and several other policies have been included
in other General Plan elements that address this
concern. See Land Use Element LU Policy 7.2.2 (The
City shall monitor actions and occurrences in the
planning area which might impact public health, safety or welfare and consider joint powers agreements with other governmental entities and other actions that may be
desirable to protect the City’s interests for the City’s benefit), LU Policy 2.3.1 (The City shall protect and
preserve the unique character of Malibu’s many distinct neighborhoods), LU Policy 2.24 (The City shall manage
development in accordance with the efficient operation of the traffic system and service infrastructure).

S Imp. Measure 54: Coordinate and work with other
governmental entities to develop
appropriate regulations to set minimum
flight levels for all aircraft, to include a
prescribed distance from the shoreline.

Removed. Regulated at federal level.

S Imp. Measure 55: Seek cooperation and approval of the FAA to ensure that only safety and
emergency uses of aircraft are allowed at
altitudes below 600 feet above local
ground level, except by City permit.

Removed. Regulated at federal level.

S Imp. Measure 56: Work with jurisdictions within the
Planning Area to ensure that all public
water storage facilities have an
emergency power supply for their
pumps, or gravity-driven water
distribution systems.

Removed and to be considered for addition to another
element that addresses public services, maybe the
Circulation and Infrastructure Element.

S Imp. Measure 57: Work with utility providers to minimize exposure to electromagnetic fields in
publicly accessible areas.

Removed. This is already regulated at the federal and
state levels and implemented by utility providers. If this is still desired, consider placing in a different element of the General Plan.
275
Exhibit G
S Imp. Measure 58: Work with neighboring jurisdictions and the State to develop and expand
emergency medical services.

Removed. This is health-related and implemented by first responder agencies and should be incorporated into their annual planning processes.

S Imp. Measure 59: Work with the appropriate jurisdictions to ensure that highways, roads, bike paths,
foot paths, and trails are free of
avoidable hazards.

Removed and to be considered for addition to the
Circulation and Infrastructure Element.

S Imp. Measure 60: Work with appropriate agencies to
ensure that the quantity of harmful
bacteria, viruses and toxic substances in
all Malibu shoreline, lagoon, and stream
waters are at or below safe levels
established by the City, State or Federal
government, whichever are more
stringent.

Removed. This is already implemented by local, regional, and state agencies through water quality monitoring and permitting processes.

S Imp. Measure 61: Work with other jurisdictions and
agencies to ensure that risks of flooding
caused by upstream development are
minimized.

Kept – see Policy S-3.2.2.

S Imp. Measure 62: Work with the responsible jurisdictions to ensure that all dams in the Malibu
watershed areas have regular safety
inspections.

Kept – see Policy S-3.2.3.

S Imp. Measure 63: Notify all jurisdictions within the Planning Area and all appropriate agencies at the
State level of the City's request to review
all plans and programs relating to issues
that may concern the health and safety
of Malibu residents.

Removed. This is already occurring.

S Imp. Measure 64: Respond to all proposed development
actions in the Planning Area which may
endanger the health and safety of the
City's residents.

Modified. Created separate hazard categories and
multiple different actions to address.

S Imp. Measure 65: Work with jurisdictions within the
Planning Area to ensure that all public
recreational areas have adequate toilet
Removed. This issue is a Coastal Act requirement and
addressed in the Local Coastal Program.
276
Exhibit G
facilities.

S GOAL 2. A Community Prepared for Effective Response to Emergencies, and Recovery when they Occur. Removed and addressed by new Goal S-1 and new Goal S-2: A Community That Can Quickly Recover After a Hazard Event.

S Objective 2.1 A comprehensive plan for response to all levels of emergency situations. Removed and addressed by Policy S-1.2.1.

S Policy 2.1.1
The City shall cooperate to achieve
efficient and prompt response by local
agencies to those emergencies which
require no outside help.

Modified – see Policy S-1.2.2.

S Policy 2.1.2 The City shall coordinate efficient
utilization of emergency assistance
provided by neighboring communities
and county agencies under mutual-aid
response.

Modified – see Policy S-1.2.2.

S Policy 2.1.3 The City shall develop a plan to ensure
that in situations of extreme emergency
the community is prepared to survive
until outside assistance arrives.

Modified – see Objective S-1.2 and Policy S-1.2.1.

S Imp. Measure 66: Develop an Emergency Response Plan
and update as needed. Modified – see Policy S-1.2.1.

S Imp. Measure 67: Support and encourage sufficient local staffing and equipment levels for police,
fire fighting, lifeguard, paramedic, and
other medical, public works and utility
organizations to assure timely and wellcoordinated response to alarm calls and to meet most emergencies.

Modified – see Action S-1.2.2a.

S Imp. Measure 68: Develop response time criteria and
monitor law enforcement programs. Modified – see Action S-1.2.6a.

S Imp. Measure 69:

Work with other agencies to assure
access to specialized trauma care within
20 minutes of notification.

Removed. This is a health-related item. In addition,
identification of time related standards is not
recommended for a general plan and should be
monitored and managed by the appropriate agency that
oversees these facilities.

S Imp. Measure 70: Create a procedure for promptly initiating an Emergency Operations Center to
Modified - see Policy S-1.2.1 and Actions S-1.2.1a and
S-1.2.1b..
277
Exhibit G
coordinate all emergency-response
actions from the onset of any emergency
which requires mutual aid from
neighboring communities.

S Imp. Measure 71: Create a procedure for promptly
establishing effective intelligencegathering and command, control and communications functions in all
emergencies requiring aid from outside
the community.

Removed and addressed by Policy S-1.2.1. This item is
currently standard practice, especially with an EOC.

S Imp. Measure 72: Establish a core of trained and organized volunteers from the community capable
of providing intelligence,
communications, medical and logistic
support to the professional health and
safety organizations in emergency
situations.

Modified – see Actions S-1.2.4a and S-1.2.4c, and Policy S-1.2.4.

S Imp. Measure 73: Work with other agencies to close public beaches to recreational use in the event
of a pollution emergency.

Removed. This is standard practice.

S imp. Measure 74: Work with other agencies to close public recreation areas to recreational use in
the event of wildfire in the Planning Area.

Removed. This is standard practice. Action S-3.3.1b
addresses coordination with other agencies.

S Imp. Measure 75: Continue to improve the area-wide,
volunteer-manned emergency
communication system.

Kept – see Action S-1.2.4b.

S Imp. Measure 76: Organize an area-wide, volunteermanned emergency medical care system including medical-center locations,
patient transport vehicles and drivers,
and triage policies and training.

Removed. This is a health-related item.

S Imp. Measure 77: Organize and equip neighborhood,
volunteer-manned emergency response
organizations, including trained first-aid
volunteers, and locally stockpiled
supplies.

Modified – see Action S-1.2.4a.
278
Exhibit G
S Imp. Measure 78: Develop and maintain an inventory of heavy equipment and trained operators
which would be available in major
emergency situations.

Removed. This is a standard practice within emergency
management to inventory assets for emergency
purposes.

S Imp. Measure 79: Conduct emergency-response drills on a regular basis. Modified – see Action S-1.2.1b.

S Imp. Measure 80: Identify emergency helicopter landing sites at strategic points throughout the
City in the City's Emergency Response
Plan. Provide data on these sites to be
included in the Los Angeles County
Emergency Response Plan.

Removed. Sites have been identified. Los Angeles
County jurisdiction.

S Imp. Measure 81: Participate in a tsunami warning system. Kept – changed to. Policy S-3.6.3.

S Imp. Measure 82: Work with the Red Cross, other private agencies, and local, state and federal
government agencies on disasterpreparedness education and training.

Kept – see Action S-1.2.4c.

S Imp. Measure 83: Map all existing and planned safety and health related facilities in Malibu. Modified – see Action S-1.2.5a.

S Objective 2.2: A comprehensive plan for recovery from all levels of emergency situations is
developed and updated as needed.

Removed and replaced with Objective S-2.1 and Policy
S-2.1.1 and Actions S-2.1.1a and S-2.1.1b.

S Policy 2.2.1: The City shall facilitate timely recovery from all disasters.

Removed and replaced with Policy S-2.1.1 and Action S2.1.1a.

S Imp. Measure 84: Create a disaster-recovery team to
develop recovery plans and
establish/maintain liaison with all
agencies involved in recovery from a
disaster in Malibu.

Modified – see Actions S-2.1.1a, S-2.1.1b and S-2.5.1a.

S Imp. Measure 85: Maintain an inventory of potential
Government and private sources of aid
to recovery from major disasters and
assist the community in obtaining this
aid.

Removed and replaced with Action S-2.3.1c.

S Imp. Measure 86: Facilitate short term recovery aid
provided by local charitable and other Removed and replaced with Action S-2.3.1c. 279
Exhibit G
groups and individuals, during recovery
from major disasters.

S Imp. Measure 87: Support and encourage residents and
local businesses to carry adequate
insurance or maintain adequate
resources to meet most emergencies.

Removed and replaced with Policy S-3.2.4.

S Imp. Measure 88: Work with law enforcement agencies to develop techniques to improve local
access during times of emergency.

Kept – see Action S-1.3.3c.

S Goal S-3: A comprehensive plan for recovery from all levels of emergency situations is developed and updated as needed. – Removed and addressed by new Goal S-2.

S Objective 3.1 Actively promote health and safety so
that residents are exceptionally safe and
healthy by national standards.

Removed and replaced with Objectives S-1.1, S-1.3, S2.4, S-3.1, S-3.2, S-3.3, S-3.4, S-3.5, S-3.6, and S-4.1.

S Policy 3.1.1 The City shall facilitate programs so that people feel safe, and crime and violence
are minimized.

Removed. This addresses law enforcement/police
protection in general. Law enforcement is a public service and could be considered for placement in a different
General Plan element.

S Policy 3.1.3 The City shall assess risks to the health and safety of citizens and visitors and
inform the public about those risks and
ways to avoid them.

Replaced with multiple policies and actions specific to each hazard type.

S Policy 3.1.4 The City shall encourage efforts by
private organizations to enhance
community health and safety.

Removed. The City can continue to accomplish this, but it is not necessary to include in the Safety Element.

S Policy 3.1.5 The City shall encourage volunteer
efforts to assist in providing safety to
businesses, residents and visitors.

Removed. Replaced with Policy S-1.2.4, and Actions S1.2.4a and S-1.2.4b.

S Policy 3.1.6 The City shall provide effective and
efficient law enforcement protection
services.

Modified – see Action S-1.2.6a.

S Policy 3.1.7 The City shall discourage the hiring of
day workers from sites which might
endanger the public health and safety.

Removed. This is not a topic for the Safety Element.

S Imp. Measure 89: Maintain a comprehensive program for strong police presence to deter criminal
Removed. This addresses law enforcement in general
and related to crime, and is not a topic for the Safety 280
Exhibit G
activity. Element. Law enforcement is a public service and could be considered for placement in a different General Plan element.

S Imp. Measure 90: Maintain a comprehensive program to
protect the Community from substance
abuse.

Removed. This is not a topic for the Safety Element, and commonly not in a General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 91: Provide law-enforcement personnel to aggressively patrol streets and
recreational areas to prevent driving
under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

Removed. This addresses law enforcement and is not a
topic for the Safety Element. Law enforcement in general is a public service and could be considered for placement in a different General Plan element.

S Imp. Measure 92: Periodically evaluate Los Angeles
County Sheriff's services and service
criteria to ensure that the City continues
to receive adequate law enforcement
services.

Kept – see Action S-1.2.6a.

S Imp. Measure 93: Work with private charitable groups to continue to provide safe and healthy
locations for the hiring of day-workers in
Malibu.

Removed. This is not a topic for the Safety Element, and commonly not in a General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 94: Prohibit smoking in government public buildings and require at a minimum that
non-smoking areas be provided in all
indoor privately owned facilities used by
the public.

Removed. This is not a topic for the Safety Element, and commonly not in a General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 95: Require that employers provide toilet facilities for all temporary and permanent
workers.

Removed. This is not a topic for the Safety Element, and commonly not in a General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 96: Encourage all service stations and public buildings to provide toilet facilities to the
public.

Removed. This is not a topic for the Safety Element, and commonly not in a General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 97: Support development of paratransit
services offered by public and/or private
agencies and service providers to
improve access to health care facilities.

This is healthcare and transportation topic unrelated to the Safety Element. If desired, it should be considered for the Circulation Element.
281
Exhibit G
S Imp. Measure 98: Work with health care providers to
assure timely access to medical care for
all segments in the community.

This is healthcare topic unrelated to the Safety Element.

If desired, it should be considered for another element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 99 Encourage efforts to provide in-home
health care for the elderly and
handicapped residents of Malibu.

This is healthcare topic unrelated to the Safety Element.

If desired, it should be considered for another element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 100: Encourage and promote facilities for hospice care and long term in-patient
medical treatment and care for the
community's elderly and seriously ill.

This is healthcare topic unrelated to the Safety Element.

If desired, it should be considered for another element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 101: Establish community health-education and safety-education programs, to
include the need to prepare well ahead
of time for emergency response and
recovery.

Kept – see Action S-1.1.2d.

S Imp. Measure 102: Work with health care providers to
promote, encourage, and facilitate
provision of urgent care at a reasonable
cost to residents and visitors.

This is healthcare topic unrelated to the Safety Element.

If desired, it should be considered for another element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 103:

Establish an education and awareness
program to enhance household, water,
and highway safety, and fire prevention.

Removed. The fire safety-related items are addressed by multiple actions in that hazard section. Topics of water may be placed in the Conservation Element or
Circulation and Infrastructure Element. Highway safety
could be addressed in the Circulation Element.

S Imp. Measure 104: Educate the community about risks to swimmers and surfers from ocean
pollution.

Removed. If desired, consider placing in the
Conservation Element.

S Imp. Measure 105: Facilitate regular testing of water at suitable locations along the Malibu
shoreline to assure that toxic
substances, bacteria, and/or virus do not
put ocean recreation participants at risk.

Removed. This is standard practice that is already
occurring at the local, regional, and state level.

S Imp. Measure 106: Review data on water quality collected and analyzed by other agencies and
document inadequacies and
inaccuracies that might impact the health
Removed. If desired, consider placing in the
Conservation Element.
282
Exhibit G
of residents. Coordinate with the
monitoring agencies to improve the
monitoring program.

S Imp. Measure 107: Work with local physicians and
environmental groups to assess risks to
swimmers and surfers from ocean
pollution due to storm drainage.

Removed. If desired, consider placing in the
Conservation Element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 108:

Enact ordinances prohibiting the placing
of graffiti within the City.

Removed. This item has been implemented already
(MMC Chapter 8.20). Additionally, it is not a topic for a Safety Element. If it is desired to remain, consider
addressing outside of the General Plan or placing in an element that addresses public services (including law
enforcement).

S Imp. Measure 109:

Take swift action to cause removal of
any graffiti that appears within the City
including properties under the jurisdiction
of other governmental agencies.

Removed. This item has been implemented already
(MMC Chapter 8.20). Additionally, it is not a topic for a Safety Element. If it is desired to remain, consider
addressing outside of the General Plan or placing in an element that addresses public services (including law
enforcement).

S Imp. Measure 110: Work with Sheriff's station to encourage employment of volunteer litter law
enforcement offers and posting of
violation warning signs.

Removed. Litter is not a Safety Element topic. If still desired, consider if this should be located in another
General Plan element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 111: Establish a volunteer program for
cleanup of litter trouble spots on Pacific
Coast Highway.

Removed. Litter is not a Safety Element topic. If still desired, consider if this should be located in another
General Plan element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 112: Develop a program to provide
conveniently located trash collection
receptacles and provide regularly
scheduled special litter cleanup for
neighborhoods suffering particularly
heavy litter accumulation.

Removed. Litter is not a Safety Element topic. If still desired, consider if this should be located in another
General Plan element or outside of the General Plan.

S Imp. Measure 113: Work with other agencies to develop literature to educate the public about the
negative impacts of litter.

Removed. Litter is not a Safety Element topic. If still desired, consider if this should be located in another
General Plan element or outside of the General Plan.
283
City Of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
N඗ගඑඋඍ ඗ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
Phone (310) 456-2489
www.malibucity.org
N඗ගඑඋඍ ඗ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
The Malibu City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, April 13, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Malibu City Hall, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, CA for the project identified below. Public comment can be submitted ahead of the public hearing to [email protected] for inclusion in the public record. To participate during the public hearing, please review the meeting agenda posted at MalibuCity.org/AgendaCenter and follow the directions for public participation.

SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE
General Plan Amendment No. 24-002 - Consider the proposed General Plan Amendment to adopt the Safety Element Update and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to adopt an updated Safety Element. The State of California requires each county and city to adopt a General Plan, consisting of several “elements,” including a Safety Element. The City’s General Plan Safety Element has been updated consistent with General Plan and Safety Element state law (Government Code Section 65302 et seq.). The purpose of the Safety Element is to incorporate safety considerations into the planning process by establishing goals, policies, and implementation actions intended to minimize the risk of injury, loss of life, property damage, and environmental damage associated with natural and manmade hazards. This includes emergency preparedness; seismic and geologic hazards; flood hazards; fire hazards; climate adaptation; shoreline protection; and hazardous materials and waste.

LOCATION: Citywide
APPLICANT: City of Malibu
CASE PLANNER: Allison Cook, Contract Planner, [email protected], (805) 415-1991 A written staff report will be available before the hearing for the project. All persons wishing to address the Council regarding this matter will be afforded an opportunity in accordance with the Council’s procedures. Oral and written comments may be presented to the City Council on, or before the date of the meeting.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. After analyzing the project, the Community Development Director determined that there is no possibility the amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and accordingly, the exemption set forth in Section 15061(b)(3) applies. In addition, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, the project is exempt from CEQA, as it consists of an action taken by a regulatory agency, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.

A draft Safety Element is available for review by any interested person at Malibu City - Hall Reception Desk, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, CA 90265 during regular business hours. For more information, including drafts of the Safety Element, visit malibucity.org/SafetyElement.

IF YOU CHALLENGE THE CITY’S ACTION IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE

ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY, AT OR PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.

YOLANDA BUNDY, Community Development Director Date: March 19, 2026 284

Agenda Item # 7.A.

Council Agenda Report
To: Mayor Silverstein and the Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Luis Flores, Senior Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Susan Dueñas, Public Safety Director
Approved by: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager
Date prepared: March 24, 2026 Meeting date: April 13, 2026 Subject: Parking Enforcement Contract Amendment and Extension RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive a presentation on the City’s Parking Enforcement Program since its inception; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with LAZ Parking, expanding the scope of work, extending the agreement an additional three years, and increasing the total compensation for services to $3,762,557 for the full term of the agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT: No additional appropriations are needed. There are sufficient funding allocations within the 100-7021 (Public Safety Services and Emergency Management) to absorb the $135,000 increase for the proposed Parking Enforcement contract amendment. The amendment increases the total two-year current contract cost to $1,228,164 through June 30, 2026. This cost will be offset by the annual parking citation revenue, which was $1,611,471 for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and is on track to net $1.8 million in Fiscal Year 2025-2026. The proposed 3-year contract extension will cost approximately $2,534,393 from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029 and will be offset by citation revenues.

STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: This item supports the City’s 2025 Strategic Plan Goal 4. Improve Public Safety, Objective 4.1: Reduce injury and fatal collision on Pacific Coast Highway.

DISCUSSION: The City’s Parking Enforcement Team, operated by LAZ Parking, began parking enforcement services on July 3, 2024. Since starting, the Parking Enforcement Team has issued 64,778 citations for a variety of violations, including obstruction of roadways, obeying parking signs, blocking fire hydrants, oversized vehicle City Council Meeting
04-13-26
Item

7.A.
1

Agenda Item # 7.A.
ordinance, unauthorized handicap parking, and more. Additionally, the Parking Enforcement Team has generated $2,833,128 in revenue through February 2026.

The Parking Enforcement Team works proactively to identify problem areas, inform vehicle owners of their violation(s) through warnings, and build relationships with the local community, all while working in partnership with LASD and VOPs. The Parking Enforcement Team has proved to be a significant asset in improving public safety throughout the City by significantly reducing the proliferation of RVs along Pacific Coast Highway, positively influencing parking behavior, and ensuring compliance with the California Vehicle Code and Municipal Code, as needed. This was achieved through the issuance of 603 oversized vehicle citations (MMC 10.18.070), 2,960 citations for parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant (CVC 22514), and 105 citations for parking in a fire lane (CVC 22500.1) among other public safety related violations.

Parking Enforcement Contract Amendment
The Parking Enforcement Team is currently providing more enforcement staffing hours each month than was allotted in the base scope of the contract due to increased needs that were identified as this new program rolled out. The Parking Enforcement Team currently consists of one (1) Parking Enforcement Supervisor, one (1) Parking Enforcement Lead, and three (3) full-time Parking Enforcement Officers that provide coverage throughout the day, including (1) Officer that provides overnight coverage on multiple days a week. These staffing levels are now maintained year-round instead of only during peak season (Memorial Day to Labor Day), constituting an increase of 1.5 FTEs (full-time equivalent) from what was initially agreed upon. Increased service levels were maintained year-round to address ongoing parking related issues that continued beyond the summer, including Recreational Vehicles along Pacific Coast Highway and illegal parking throughout highly visited areas of the City such as the Point Dume Headlands.

Therefore, to allow for effective continuity of service, staff recommends that the City Council amend the parking enforcement contract to increase the total contract cost by $135,000 through the end of the current contract period, which is set to conclude on June 30, 2026. In addition, maintaining current staffing levels during this period will ensure that there is sufficient parking enforcement during Memorial Day Weekend and the beginning of Summer when visitor traffic increases.
3-Year Contract Extension
During the February 4, 2026, Regular Public Safety Commission (Commission) Meeting, staff presented an overview of current parking enforcement service levels and the Commission provided feedback on a proposed 3-year contract extension and potential service level changes. The Commission moved to increase year-round staffing levels by 2

Agenda Item # 7.A.
(1) full-time Parking Enforcement Officer and add (1) seasonal Parking Enforcement Officer / Towing Officer to provide assistance from Memorial Day to Labor Day every year.

LAZ Parking has provided a 3-year contract proposal that reflects expanded service levels to meet the Commission and City staff recommendations, and an expanded Scope of Work (Attachment 2). The estimated yearly costs are as follows:

Year 3 – $822,407
Year 4 – $843,444
Year 5 – $868,542
Total – $2,534,393
The new yearly costs cover increased service levels, body cams for personnel and community member safety and accountability, an additional patrol vehicle, Starlink service capabilities to ensure ticketing device connectivity throughout the City, and a Towing Officer to start in Year 4 in conjunction with the proposed year-round impound yard that is being explored at the City’s Ioke Lot. The costs also include a $30,000 yearly contingency fund that could be used if additional services are needed during special events.

Additionally, the contract extension proposal includes an expanded Scope of Work that allows for the Parking Enforcement Team to provide emergency assistance to the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) at the direction of the EOC Director.

The Parking Enforcement Team has proved to be a significant asset to improving public safety by enforcing the vehicle code, addressing unsafe parking situations, reducing the number of illegally parked recreational vehicles, providing community education, and increasing the presence of public safety throughout the City. A comprehensive Parking Enforcement Report (Attachment 3) has been provided to highlight the successes of the Parking Enforcement Team’s operations. Additionally, the Parking Enforcement Team provided crucial public safety patrol assistance during the Palisades Fire and currently notifies City staff of various public safety hazards observed during patrols.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Amendment 1 to Parking Enforcement Contract with LAZ Parking

2. 3-Year Contract Extension Proposal

3. Parking Enforcement Report – July 2024 Through February 2026 3 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (“Amendment No. 1”) is made and entered into on April 13, 2026, by and between the CITY OF MALIBU, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and LAZ PARKING CALIFORNIA, LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”. City and Consultant are each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties”.

The City and the Consultant agree as follows:

R E C I T A L S
A. On June 10, 2024, the City entered into an agreement with Consultant to provide parking enforcement services (the “Agreement”).

B. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to expand the Scope of the Consultant’s Services to include an additional full-time parking enforcement officer, a seasonal hybrid officer, and to provide emergency response services; to extend the Term of the Agreement by three years; and increase Compensation for Services by $2,669,393, which will cover additional funding for the current fiscal year and three additional years; and Consultant has submitted a proposal for this purpose that is acceptable to the City.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations and covenants hereinafter contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1.0 – Scope of the Consultant’s Services, of the Agreement, is hereby amended to include the additional services and tasks of an additional full-time parking enforcement officer, a seasonal hybrid officer to serve as both a parking enforcement officer and tow officer, and emergency response support services to assist the City during an Emergency Operation Center activation, as more particularly set forth in the additional Scope of Services attached to this Amendment No. 1 as Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event that any provision of Exhibit A conflicts with the Agreement, the provisions of the Agreement govern.

2. Section 2.0 – Term of Agreement, of the Agreement, is hereby extended to June 30, 2029, unless extended in writing by City and Consultant.

3. Section 4.0 – Compensation for Services, of the Agreement, is hereby amended in the amount of $2,669,393 in accordance with the fee and cost schedule set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto for a new total not to exceed $3,762,557 for the term of the agreement.

4. The Parties agree that this Amendment No. 1 will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered physically or by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

5. All terms and conditions of the Agreement not amended by this Amendment No. 1 remain in full force and effect.
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 4 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement
LAZ Parking

_____________________
255-2
This Amendment No. 1 is executed on ______________________, at Malibu, California, and effective as of April 13, 2026.

CITY:

CITY OF MALIBU, a municipal corporation:
____________________________________
BRUCE SILVERSTEIN, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
KELSEY PETTIJOHN, City Clerk
(seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT:

LAZ PARKING CALIFORNIA, LLC,
a Connecticut limited liability company
_____________________________________ By:
____________________________________
TREVOR RUSIN, Interim City Attorney Name: CONRAD MIDOLO Title: Regional Vice President
Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 5 PARKING ENFORCEMENT

ADDITIONAL SUPPORT

PROPOSAL
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026
Exhibit A
Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 6 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Cover Letter 2 Cover Letter
February 23, 2026
City of Malibu, California
ATTN: Susan Duenas, Public Safety Director
[email protected], 310-456-2489, ext. 313
RE: Three-Year Extension & Additional Parking Enforcement Support Proposal – Malibu Dear Susan,
On behalf of LAZ Parking, I would like to extend our sincere appreciation to you, your staff, and the City of Malibu for the continued partnership as we approach the completion of CY2. We are proud of the progress we have made together and are grateful for the trust placed in our team.

As we move forward with a three-year extension of our agreement, we remain fully committed to supporting the City’s parking enforcement and operational needs. Our team takes great pride in serving the Malibu community and ensuring the highest level of service and responsiveness.

With the additional support needed for the Malibu location, we have outlined our proposed enhancements to ensure continued efficiency, coverage, and service excellence. We are confident these resources will further strengthen our partnership and meet the City’s evolving needs.

We value our relationship with the City of Malibu and look forward to many more years of collaboration and success together.

Sincerely,

MUHAMMAD MANSOOR, CAPP CONRAD MIDOLO
Vice President, Municipal Operations Regional Vice President, Los Angeles 949 South Coast Drive, Suite 515 1200 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 100B Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Los Angeles, CA 90017
(714) 290-4854 (562) 332-8619
[email protected] [email protected]
Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 7 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Cover Letter 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 8 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Proposed Additional Staffing 4 Proposed Additional Staffing
Parking Enforcement Officer (1 Full-time, PM Shift)
The addition of one full-time Parking Enforcement Officer (PEO) and one part-time seasonal PEO (Memorial Day through summer, as needed) will strengthen our ability to manage increased activity during Malibu’s peak season. This will expand overall coverage, allow for more consistent patrols in high-demand areas, and improve response times.

The proposed schedule for the full-time officer will be 12:45 p.m. to 9:15 p.m., enhancing coverage during the afternoon and evening hours, which are typically the busiest periods. The seasonal position will provide additional support during peak times to ensure continued safety, compliance, and efficient operations.

Tow Officer (1 Part-time seasonal/ Hybrid)
With the establishment of the City’s tow agency, LAZ proposes the addition of one dedicated tow officer beginning in CY3, as requested, to support the expanded enforcement needs.

During our initial year working with the City of Malibu, we collaborated closely with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to identify vehicles requiring impound. LAZ Parking is highly experienced in California impound policies and procedures and currently performs vehicle impounds for the Cities of West Hollywood and Inglewood.

This enforcement detail involves identifying vehicles parked in tow-away zones, determining towable violations, completing all required documentation (including the California Highway Patrol CHP 180 form), and coordinating removal with the City’s authorized towing contractor.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 9 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Proposed Additional Vehicle 5 Officers must ensure signage is enforceable, photographic documentation is complete, and all required information is properly recorded prior to impound.

Upon tow completion, officers obtain a tow log number from dispatch and, at the end of their shift, report to the Sheriff’s station to log the tow and submit documentation to ensure accurate records in the event of a stolen vehicle inquiry.

The dedicated tow officer proposed for CY3 will enhance the City’s current program and provide focused support for tow enforcement operations. When not actively engaged in impound activity, the officer will patrol in alignment with standard parking enforcement duties, ensuring consistent coverage and operational efficiency.

Proposed Additional Vehicle
With the proposed added staffing, LAZ proposes the purchase of one more enforcement patrol vehicle to ensure each PEO on duty has a dedicated vehicle to use.

In addition, should the City be interested, the new enforcement vehicle can be outfitted with License Plate Readers (LPRs) to help with overtime parking enforcement.

Enforcement of time-limit parking around shopping districts helps promote parking turnover so that other visitors can patronize businesses to help with the local economy.

Enforcement routes for the day shift will include multiple patrols of Cross Creek Road, that has a 3-hour parking limit. In areas where time-limit parking has been an issue, LAZ has helped other cities improve parking turnover, especially highly congested areas in West Hollywood and Burbank where those cities must balance the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses. Other time limit zones we can utilize LPR to promote parking turnover are Point Dume and Cliffside, where we can time-mark vehicles for 2 hours and issue citations to those vehicles who stay over the limit.

The vehicle pricing excludes LPR equipment. LAZ can provide a separate quote upon request.

Emergency Response and
Traffic Control Contingency
Traffic Control: In accordance with the City’s traffic control guidelines, CONTRACTOR shall assist the City and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department with traffic management during Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 10 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | LAZ Parking Proposed Pricing 6 power outages and other emergencies affecting the safe flow of traffic, including at signalized intersections, stop-controlled intersections, and other impacted locations.

Emergency Response Support: In the event of a major emergency or natural or man-made disaster, CONTRACTOR shall make its personnel, vehicles, and communication resources available to provide emergency assistance under the direction of the City’s Public Safety Director or the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

LAZ Parking Proposed Pricing
LAZ Parking's proposed cost structure for the City of Malibu encompasses our commitment to providing the City with the support needed to run a successful and effective parking enforcement program. Below, you will find two pricing options to add to our current contract.

Option 1 indicates pricing for all the recommended additions. LAZ understands that the tow officer and LPR vehicle enhancement may require further discussion and analysis. (1) PEO, (1) Seasonal PEO, (1) Tow Officer, (1) additional patrol car Contract Year Hourly Rate Annual
Hours Annually
Manager Year 3 $59.39 2,080 $123,529
Year 4 $61.17 2,080 $127,235
Year 5 $63.01 2,080 $131,052
Tow Officer/ Hybrid Officer Year 3 $39.72 520 $20,654
Year 4 $40.91 520 $21,274
Year 5 $42.14 520 $21,912
Parking Enforcement Officer Year 3 $35.68 10,400 $371,052 Year 4 $36.75 10,400 $382,183
Year 5 $37.85 10,400 $393,646
Other Direct Charges Year 3 $277,171
Year 4 $282,751
Year 5 $291,929
Contingency Fund Year 3 $30,000
Year 4 $30,000
Year 5 $30,000
Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 11 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | LAZ Parking's proposed cost structure for the City of Malibu encompasses our commitment to providing the City with the support needed to 7 Estimated Annual Costs Year 3 $822,407
Year 4 $843,444
Year 5 $868,542

OTHER DIRECT CHARGES
All operating expenses in support of this program will be invoiced monthly. Listed below are operating expenses:
• Capital Expenditures – 1 Equipped Hybrid Vehicles
• Vehicle O&M Expenses – Fuel, Insurance, Upkeep and Preventative Maintenance • (2) Additional Citation Issuance Handhelds and Printers • Walkie-Talkie Radios with better range for staff communication • Ticket Rolls, Envelopes and Office Supplies
• Uniforms, Liability Insurance
• Professional Services
• G&A, OH and all other expenses
• Body Cam – A wearable camera used by officers to record interactions and incidents in real time, promoting transparency, accountability, and accurate documentation. • Starlink – A satellite-based internet system that provides reliable high-speed connectivity, ensuring consistent communication and access to systems in areas with limited or unstable service.

Docusign Envelope ID: 8DE71280-26C8-4BFB-81A7-FF31EC3384D7 12 PARKING ENFORCEMENT

ADDITIONAL SUPPORT

PROPOSAL
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026
13 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Cover Letter 2 Cover Letter
February 23, 2026
City of Malibu, California
ATTN: Susan Duenas, Public Safety Director
[email protected], 310-456-2489, ext. 313
RE: Three-Year Extension & Additional Parking Enforcement Support Proposal – Malibu Dear Susan,
On behalf of LAZ Parking, I would like to extend our sincere appreciation to you, your staff, and the City of Malibu for the continued partnership as we approach the completion of CY2. We are proud of the progress we have made together and are grateful for the trust placed in our team.

As we move forward with a three-year extension of our agreement, we remain fully committed to supporting the City’s parking enforcement and operational needs. Our team takes great pride in serving the Malibu community and ensuring the highest level of service and responsiveness.

With the additional support needed for the Malibu location, we have outlined our proposed enhancements to ensure continued efficiency, coverage, and service excellence. We are confident these resources will further strengthen our partnership and meet the City’s evolving needs.

We value our relationship with the City of Malibu and look forward to many more years of collaboration and success together.

Sincerely,

MUHAMMAD MANSOOR, CAPP CONRAD MIDOLO
Vice President, Municipal Operations Regional Vice President, Los Angeles 949 South Coast Drive, Suite 515 1200 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 100B Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Los Angeles, CA 90017
(714) 290-4854 (562) 332-8619
[email protected] [email protected]
14 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Cover Letter 3 15 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Proposed Additional Staffing 4 Proposed Additional Staffing
Parking Enforcement Officer (1 Full-time, PM Shift and 1 Part-time seasonal) The addition of one full-time Parking Enforcement Officer (PEO) and one part-time seasonal PEO (Memorial Day through summer, as needed) will strengthen our ability to manage increased activity during Malibu’s peak season. This will expand overall coverage, allow for more consistent patrols in high-demand areas, and improve response times.

The proposed schedule for the full-time officer will be 12:45 p.m. to 9:15 p.m., enhancing coverage during the afternoon and evening hours, which are typically the busiest periods. The seasonal position will provide additional support during peak times to ensure continued safety, compliance, and efficient operations.

Tow Officer
With the establishment of the City’s tow agency, LAZ proposes the addition of one dedicated tow officer beginning in CY4, as requested, to support the expanded enforcement needs.

During our initial year working with the City of Malibu, we collaborated closely with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to identify vehicles requiring impound. LAZ Parking is highly experienced in California impound policies and procedures and currently performs vehicle impounds for the Cities of West Hollywood and Inglewood.

This enforcement detail involves identifying vehicles parked in tow-away zones, determining towable violations, completing all required documentation (including the California Highway Patrol CHP 180 form), and coordinating removal with the City’s authorized towing contractor. 16 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | Proposed Additional Vehicle 5 Officers must ensure signage is enforceable, photographic documentation is complete, and all required information is properly recorded prior to impound.

Upon tow completion, officers obtain a tow log number from dispatch and, at the end of their shift, report to the Sheriff’s station to log the tow and submit documentation to ensure accurate records in the event of a stolen vehicle inquiry.

The dedicated tow officer proposed for CY4 will enhance the City’s current program and provide focused support for tow enforcement operations. When not actively engaged in impound activity, the officer will patrol in alignment with standard parking enforcement duties, ensuring consistent coverage and operational efficiency.

Proposed Additional Vehicle
With the proposed added staffing, LAZ proposes the purchase of one more enforcement patrol vehicle to ensure each PEO on duty has a dedicated vehicle to use.

In addition, should the City be interested, the new enforcement vehicle can be outfitted with License Plate Readers (LPRs) to help with overtime parking enforcement.

Enforcement of time-limit parking around shopping districts helps promote parking turnover so that other visitors can patronize businesses to help with the local economy.

Enforcement routes for the day shift will include multiple patrols of Cross Creek Road, that has a 3-hour parking limit. In areas where time-limit parking has been an issue, LAZ has helped other cities improve parking turnover, especially highly congested areas in West Hollywood and Burbank where those cities must balance the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses. Other time limit zones we can utilize LPR to promote parking turnover are Point Dume and Cliffside, where we can time-mark vehicles for 2 hours and issue citations to those vehicles who stay over the limit.

The vehicle pricing excludes LPR equipment. LAZ can provide a separate quote upon request.

Emergency Response and
Traffic Control Contingency
Traffic Control: In accordance with the City’s traffic control guidelines, CONTRACTOR shall assist the City and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department with traffic management during 17 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | LAZ Parking Proposed Pricing 6 power outages and other emergencies affecting the safe flow of traffic, including at signalized intersections, stop-controlled intersections, and other impacted locations.

Emergency Response Support: In the event of a major emergency or natural or man-made disaster, CONTRACTOR shall make its personnel, vehicles, and communication resources available to provide emergency assistance under the direction of the City’s Public Safety Director or the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

LAZ Parking Proposed Pricing
LAZ Parking's proposed cost structure for the City of Malibu encompasses our commitment to providing the City with the support needed to run a successful and effective parking enforcement program. Below, you will find two pricing options to add to our current contract.

Option 1 indicates pricing for all the recommended additions. LAZ understands that the tow officer and LPR vehicle enhancement may require further discussion and analysis. (1) PEO, (1) Seasonal PEO, (1) Tow Officer, (1) additional patrol car Contract Year Hourly Rate Annual
Hours Annually
Manager Year 3 $59.39 2,080 $123,529
Year 4 $61.17 2,080 $127,235
Year 5 $63.01 2,080 $131,052
Tow Officer/ Hybrid Officer Year 3 $39.72 520 $20,654
Year 4 $40.91 520 $21,274
Year 5 $42.14 520 $21,912
Parking Enforcement Officer Year 3 $35.68 10,400 $371,052 Year 4 $36.75 10,400 $382,183
Year 5 $37.85 10,400 $393,646
Other Direct Charges Year 3 $277,171
Year 4 $282,751
Year 5 $291,929
Contingency Fund Year 3 $30,000
Year 4 $30,000
Year 5 $30,000
18 Parking Enforcement Additional Support Proposal
City of Malibu, CA | February 23, 2026 | LAZ Parking's proposed cost structure for the City

7 Estimated Annual Costs Year 3 $822,407
Year 4 $843,444
Year 5 $868,542

OTHER DIRECT CHARGES
All operating expenses in support of this program will be invoiced monthly. Listed below are operating expenses:
• Capital Expenditures – 1 Equipped Hybrid Vehicles
• Vehicle O&M Expenses – Fuel, Insurance, Upkeep and Preventative Maintenance • (2) Additional Citation Issuance Handhelds and Printers • Walkie-Talkie Radios with better range for staff communication • Ticket Rolls, Envelopes and Office Supplies
• Uniforms, Liability Insurance
• Professional Services
• G&A, OH and all other expenses
• Body Cam – A wearable camera used by officers to record interactions and incidents in real time, promoting transparency, accountability, and accurate documentation. • Starlink – A satellite-based internet system that provides reliable high-speed connectivity, ensuring consistent communication and access to systems in areas with limited or unstable service.
19 This report has been impacted by the Franklin Fire/ Palisades fire technical issues with Ticket Pro.

Report July-2024 to Feb-2026
Date: Mar 3, 2026
Citation Counts by Month
Citation Overview
July-24
Aug-24
Sep-24
Oct-24
Nov-24
Dec-24
Jan-25
Feb-25
Mar-25
Apr-25
May-25
Jun-25
Jul-25
Aug-25
Sep-25
Oct-25
Nov-25
Dec-25
Jan-26
Feb-26
0 1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2135
3300
4130
4369
3043
2144
714
1036
2857
3121
3879
3587
6096
5875
4113
3774
2783
2364
2733 2725
Overall
Citation Count 64,778
20 Most Common Violations
NO

FRONT/REAR

LIC PLATES

43.7%
OBEY

SIGN/CURBS/M

ARKINGS

23.1%

ALL OTHER

VIOLATIONS

18.7%

EXPIRED

REGISTRATIO
N

9.8%
FIRE
HYDRANT 15
FEET

4.7%
Warning Citations
Warning Status
No 60088
Yes 4690
Contested Citations
Contest Status
Overall
No 60892
Yes 3886
21 Citation Counts by Violation
Violation Violation Code
Jul-24-
Feb-26
2ND OFF ANTI-GRIDLOCK ACT 22526 CVC 2
3RD OFFENSE ANI-GRIDLOCK ACT 22526 CVC 1
ABANDONED VEHICLE ON ROADWAY 22523 (B) CVC 19
ALTERED LICENSE PLATE 4464 CVC 310
ANGLE PARKING 15.64.240 LACO 23
BICYCLE LANES/UNAUTH PKG 15.52.040 LACO 38
BICYCLE PARKING 21210 CVC 2
BLOCKING DISABLED ACCESS RAMP 22500 (L) CVC 6
BLOCKING DRIVEWAY 22500 (E) CVC 36
BUS LOADING ZONE 15.64.110 LACO 204
BUS ZONE 22500 (I) CVC 41
CURB PARKING ONE-WAY ROADWAY 22502 (E) CVC 7
DISCONNECTED TRAILER 15.64.100 LACO 146
DOUBLE PARKING 15.64.250 LACO 22
EXPIRED REGISTRATION 4000 (A) CVC 6365
FAIL TO APPLY FOR REGISTRATION 4152.5 CVC 35
FIRE HYDRANT 15 FEET 22514 CVC 2960
FIRE LANE 22500.1 CVC 105
HANDICAP/CROSSHATCH 22507.8(C)(2)CVC 152
22 HANDICAP/NO PLACARD 22507.8 (A) CVC 447 HANDICAP/OBSTRUCT 22507.8 (B) CVC 11 BEACHES/UNAUTHORIZED 17.12.230 LACO 2
HANDICAP/BOUNDARIES 22507.8 (C) CVC 2
INCORRECT REGISTRATION ON CAR 4462 (B) CVC 162
KEY IN IGNITION/UNATTEND VEH 15.64.210 LACO 11
LICENSE PLATE COVERED 5201 (C)(D) CVC 226
MUTILATED/ILLEGAL LICENSE PLT 4457 CVC 860
NO CURRENT TABS ON VEHICLE 5204 (A) CVC 2276
NO FRONT/REAR LIC PLATES 5200 CVC 28314
NO PARKING ANYTIME 15.64.260 LACO 132
OBEY SIGN/CURBS/MARKINGS 15.20.070 LACO 14935
OBSCURING READABILITY OF LIC PLAT 5201.1 CVC 547
OBSTRUCT EMERG ROUTES 19.12.1410 LACO 2
OBSTRUCT ROADWAY/LANE 15.64.300 LACO 977
OVERSIZE VEH - 1ST VIOL W/IN 1 YR 10.18.070 MC 318
OVERSIZE VEH - 2ND VIOL W/IN 1 YR 10.18.070 MC 79
OVERSIZE VEH-3RD/MORE VIOL W/IN
1YR

10.18.070 MC 206
PARALLEL PKG AND 18 INCHES CRB 22502 CVC 152
PARALLEL PKG OVR 18IN FRM CRB 15.64.230 LACO 1093
PARK 18IN FRM CURB/WRONG DIR 22502 (A) CVC 167
23 PARKING AGAINST RED CURB 15.64.180 LACO 29 PKG NEAR SIDEWALK RAMP 22522 CVC 11 PARKING IN SPACE MARKINGS 15.20.130 LACO 12 PARKING AT MAIL BOX 15.64.040 LACO 4
PARKING ON BRIDGE 22500 (K) CVC 34
PARKING ON CROSSWALK 22500 (B) CVC 12
PARKING ON SIDEWALK 22500 (F) CVC 173
PARKING VEHICLE FOR SALE 15.64.340 LACO 48
PARKING WRONG SIDE OF STREET 15.64.280 LACO 750
PKG ASSIGNED PKG SPACES 15.64.390 LACO 6
PKG IN INTERSECTION 15.64.330 LACO 12
PKG LOADING ZONES (COMMERCIAL) 15.64.020 LACO 118
PKG WITHIN INTERSECTION 22500 (A) CVC 12
PARKING METERS 15.64.470 LACO 34
POSITION OF PLATES 5201 CVC 2016
PVT/PUBLIC ILLEGAL PARKING 15.64.270 LACO 8
STOP/PKG W/IN 20FT CROSSWALK 22500(n)(1)(A) CVC 92
PARKS/UNAUTHORIZE PARKING 17.04.370 LACO 12
VEHICLES ON SIDEWALK 15.76.080 LACO 2
24

Agenda Item # 7.B.

Council Agenda Report
To: Mayor Silverstein and the Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Gregory Kajszo, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed by: Christopher Smith, Assistant City Manager
Approved by: Joseph D. Irvin, City Manager
Date prepared: March 25, 2026 Meeting date: April 13, 2026 Subject: Los Angeles County’s Essential Services Restoration Act & AB 1768 Discussion and Direction
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Discuss and provide direction on whether the City of Malibu should take a formal position on the Essential Services Restoration Act ballot measure and AB 1768, both of which could increase the local sales tax rate, and 2) Authorize the Mayor to send a letter, in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to the County of Los Angeles reflecting the Council’s position.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: NA.

DISCUSSION:

Components of California Sales Tax Rates
The fully utilized sales tax rate for California agencies is 9.25%. This consists of the State sales tax rate of 7.25% and an authorization from the California Revenue and Taxation Code for counties to levy up to 2% in transactions and use tax (TUT). 1 However, the State
has approved bills over time that have authorized local agencies and their voters to pass measures exempt from this 2% TUT cap, resulting in many cities exceeding this 9.25% utilization to various degrees.
1 California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7251.1, 2026, https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol1/tutl/7251-1.html City Council Meeting
04-13-26
Item

7.B.
1

Agenda Item # 7.B.

Malibu’s Sales Tax Rate
Malibu’s sales tax rate is 10.25%.
2 It currently has an unutilized TUT cap space of 0.5%
(Figure 1).

Figure 1: Breakdown of Malibu’s 10.25% Sales Tax Rate
State General Fund State 3.9375%
City/County General Fund (Bradley-Burns) State 1.0000%
County Public Safety (Prop 172) State 0.5000%
County Realignment (Mental Health/ Welfare/ Public Safety) State 1.5625% Countywide Transportation Fund State 0.2500%
Malibu Prop MC (MTUT) TUT 0.5000%
Los Angeles County Prop A (LACT) TUT 0.5000%
Los Angeles County Measure C (LATC) TUT 0.5000%
Los Angeles County Housing Measure A (HOUS) * TUT 0.5000% Los Angeles County Measure R (LAMT) * TUT 0.5000%
Los Angeles County Measure M (LAMA) * TUT 0.5000%
*Exempt from the 2% TUT cap
The Essential Services Restoration Act
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has approved placing the Essential Services Restoration Act (ESRA) on the June 2, 2026 ballot (Attachment 1). If approved by voters, the measure would impose a countywide 0.5% general sales tax through October 1, 2031. An estimated $1 billion in annual revenue from the measure would be deposited into the County General Fund and subject to independent audits and oversight by a nine-member citizens oversight committee.

The Board of Supervisors adopted a spending framework expressing intent on how revenues generated by the ESRA measure could be allocated, subject to the County’s annual budget process. The framework prioritizes health care, public health, and social services and includes funding for County departments and qualifying nonprofit providers.

The ordinance specifies the creation of citizens oversight committee to review revenues and expenditures, obtain the County’s annual independent audit, and present an annual report to the Board at a public meeting. The committee would not have decision-making authority over spending priorities.
2 California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, 2026, https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/taxratesbycountyandcity.pdf 2

Agenda Item # 7.B.

AB 1768
Separately, AB 1768 (Bryan) would authorize Los Angeles County to exceed the 2% TUT cap by 0.5% through December 31, 2031 (Attachment 2). If passed, this could effectively exempt the ESRA from the 2% TUT cap limit.

Implications for Malibu
If passed, the ERSA would bring Malibu’s sales tax to 10.75%.

The outcome of AB 1768 would determine whether the ESRA would absorb Malibu’s available 0.5% TUT cap space or add to the maximum capacity. Adding to the capacity would increase the city’s total possible sales tax limit to 11.25% (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Malibu’s Total Possible Sales Tax Limits Under Different Legislative Outcomes Legislative Outcomes Malibu Sales Tax Limit
Current (neither the ESRA nor AB 1768 pass) 10.25%
ESRA passes without AB 1768 10.75%
ESRA and AB 1768 both pass 11.25%
Local Responses
Several municipalities and organizations have taken formal positions regarding the proposed sales tax increase. The California Contract Cities Association submitted a letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors expressing opposition to the measure.3 The cities of Arcadia,
4 La Verne,5 Pico Rivera,6 and Vernon7 have each taken formal action opposing the ESRA.
3 Public Request to Address the Board of Supervisors (page 70), 2026 https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/212319.pdf 4 City of Arcadia March 17 Council Meeting Minutes, 2026, https://www.arcadiaca.gov/Document%20Center/Government/City%20Clerk/Agenda%20and%20Minutes/2026/2026-03- 17_CC_Meeting_Agenda.pdf
5 La Verne Resolution No. 26-10, 2026, https://www.laverneca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4849/Resolution-Opposing-theLos-Angeles-County-Healthcare-Funding-Restoration-Act 6 Public Request to Address the Board of Supervisors (page 74), 2026, https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/212319.pdf 7 Public Request to Address the Board of Supervisors (page 90), 2026, https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/212319.pdf 3

Agenda Item # 7.B.

In contrast, Valley Community Healthcare8 and SHIELDS for Families9 have expressed support for the measure.

Council Direction
Staff are requesting Council to discuss and provide direction on whether the City of Malibu wants to formally support, oppose, or take no position on Los Angeles County’s Essential Services Restoration Act & AB 1768. Staff are also requesting Council to authorize staff to write a letter to the County of Los Angeles reflecting their position, if any.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles Providing for and Giving Notice of an Election on a General Countywide Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax Measure to be Held in the County of Los Angeles on June 2, 2026, and Consolidating the Special Election with the Statewide Primary Election to be Held on June 2, 2026.

2. Assembly Bill 1768: Transactions and use taxes: County of Los Angeles, 2025- 2026.
8 Protecting Medi-Cal for Our Communities, 2026, https://valleycommunityhealthcare.org/vch-in-the-news-protecting-medical-for-our-communities/ 9 Public Request to Address the Board of Supervisors (page 96), 2026, https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/212319.pdf 4 HOA.105763538.16

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF

LOS ANGELES PROVIDING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION ON A

GENERAL COUNTYWIDE TRANSACTIONS AND USE (SALES) TAX MEASURE TO BE HELD IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ON JUNE 2, 2026, AND

CONSOLIDATING THE SPECIAL ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 2026
WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles (County) relies on federal funding to support the delivery of vital services to the public, including health care, food assistance, social services, public health programs, child welfare services, housing, public safety, and other services critical for the health and safety of the public.

WHEREAS, 3.3 million County residents (one in three) rely on Medi-Cal for healthcare coverage and almost 1.5 million County residents rely on the Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program (SNAP) (called CalFresh in California) for nutritional needs.

WHEREAS, on July 4, 2025, H.R. 1, also known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," was signed into federal law. This law imposes, among other cuts to public services, extensive reductions in federal support for Medicaid and SNAP and may cause hundreds of thousands of County residents who rely on Medi-Cal to lose coverage and face reduced access to care. It could result in overcrowding of emergency rooms when residents are unable to get any health care until they are experiencing a life-threatening crisis.

WHEREAS, the cumulative fiscal impact of federal laws and policies imposed since January 20, 2025, including H.R. 1, Executive Orders on grant oversight, and new federal terms and conditions restrictions, has led the County's most impacted departments to project revenue losses totaling $2.4 billion over the next three years, which may result in hiring freezes, service reductions, potential layoffs of 5,000 staff, and facility closures in the coming years.

WHEREAS, federal funding cuts could affect public health services like chronic disease prevention, disease tracking, and water safety, as well as the health care provided at the County's four public hospitals, numerous clinics, partner non-profit safety net hospitals and community health centers, and these cuts will disproportionately affect low-income families and target health care and public health providers.

WHEREAS, proposed reductions at both the federal and State levels are expected to significantly affect Medicaid (Medi-Cal), which is a primary revenue source for the Department of Health Services (DHS). In just four months following H.R. 1's signing, the County lost an average of 1,000 people per day from Medi-Cal enrollment — over 120,000 people between July and November 2025. During the same four-month period, more than 27,000 children under 18 lost their Medi-Cal coverage, equating to nearly 200 children per day.
5 HOA.105763538.16
WHEREAS, from July 2025 to November 2025, since H.R. 1's signing, over 70,000 County residents were dropped from CalFresh enrollment — including almost 27,000 children under 18.

WHEREAS, this funding and coverage loss will cause a serious threat to the long-term sustainability of critical safety net services relied upon by County residents.

DHS, for example, needs to absorb a projected federal revenue loss exceeding $700 million per year.

WHEREAS, the Department of Public Health (DPH) is projecting a $200-300 million loss in federal and State funds. DPH is forecasting a minimum $42 million deficit in fiscal year 2025-26, requiring various clinic closures, service reductions, personnel reassignments, and possible terminations. This deficit will likely worsen given cuts to federal revenue.

WHEREAS, Medicaid is the single largest source of revenue for Los Angeles County's health departments, including the 23 health centers and four acute care hospitals run by the County and many non-profit safety-net facilities that provide irreplaceable life-saving services for residents of Los Angeles County.

WHEREAS, many key provisions of H.R. 1 took effect immediately, including the prohibition on new provider taxes, which effectively negates Proposition 35 that voters approved in November 2024 and that would have extended the State's managed care organization (MCO) tax and provided needed support to the Medi-Cal program while also providing dedicated funding to public hospitals which was assumed in the current State and County budgets for the current fiscal year.

WHEREAS, H.R. 1 immediately freezes supplemental Medicaid funding and prevents the Los Angeles County health departments from being able to draw down expected and needed supplemental Medicaid payments causing a significant negative impact on the County budget immediately and escalating over time.

WHEREAS, the County will be required to provide certain health care and human services funded with revenue from the County's General Fund which will directly impact the County's ability to provide other vital services to County residents, including, but not limited to, social services, supportive services for unhoused residents, and public safety.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Parts 1.6 and 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the County is authorized to impose a retail transactions and use (sales) tax in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County for general purposes, including health care and human services, at a rate of one-half percent (0.5%).

WHEREAS, section 2 of article XIIIC of the California Constitution, sections 53721-53724 of the California Government Code, and Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code authorize the County of Los Angeles to levy, 6 HOA.105763538.16
increase, or extend a general sales tax upon two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors and a majority vote of the electorate.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to levy a general sales tax at the rate of one-half percent (0.5 %), effective as of October 1, 2026, to continue for a period of five years.

WHEREAS, pursuant to article XIII C, section 2(b) of the Constitution and California Government Code section 53724(c), an election for the approval of a temporary general sales tax must be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local government.

WHEREAS, the County's regularly scheduled elections are held on the same day as the statewide primary election in each even-numbered year, and the next regularly scheduled election for members of the Board of Supervisors and the next statewide primary election will be held on Tuesday, June 2, 2026.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it necessary, essential, and in the public interest to submit the sales tax measure to the qualified voters within the County at an election to be held on June 2, 2026, and to consolidate such election with the other elections to be held on that date.

WHEREAS, the tax revenues from this general sales tax levy would partly offset reductions in federal support imposed by H.R. 1 and help the County to continue to provide vital services, including health care and human services to the public.

WHEREAS, voter approval of this ordinance will not affect the County's existing sales taxes, which will continue to be levied.

WHEREAS, to promote accountability and transparency, this ordinance provides for the creation of a citizens' oversight committee that will review the receipt and expenditures of the revenues from the general sales tax and provide annual reporting of the committee's review at a public meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles that:

Section 1. Call of the Election and Purpose. An election shall be held and the same is hereby called and ordered to be held in the County on the 2nd day of June 2026, for the purpose of submitting to the voters: (1) the ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein (Ordinance) by this reference, which was approved by two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors. The Ordinance shall become effective if a majority of the qualified voters of the County of Los Angeles voting on the Ordinance measure set forth in Section 2, below, vote in favor of the measure. 7 HOA.105763538.16
Section 2. Ballot Measure. Pursuant to Elections Code section 10403, the measure shall appear on the ballot substantially as follows:

Essential Services Restoration Act for Los Angeles County General Sales Tax Measure
Shall the measure to help our community address severe federal cuts enacted by the President and Congress; reduce the loss of essential services, including healthcare for County residents; reduce the risk of closing the County's four public hospitals and numerous clinics, and significant healthcare provider layoffs and other service cuts by enacting a 1/2 percent (0.5%) general sales tax for 5 years, generating approximately $1 billion annually, with independent audits, be adopted?
Yes
No
Section 3. Proclamation. Pursuant to section 12001 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles hereby PROCLAIMS that an election shall be held in the County on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, to vote upon the measure.

Section 4. Election Procedure. All qualified voters residing within the County shall be permitted to vote in the election and in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the elections shall be held as nearly as practicable in conformity with the Elections Code of the State of California. The votes cast for and against the measure shall be separately counted, and if the measure receives a majority of the votes cast by the qualified electors voting on the measure, the general sales tax in the amount stated in the Ordinance shall be effective and ratified. Should another proposed measure with conflicting provisions appear on the same ballot, and each proposed measure receives a majority of votes, the proposed measure with the highest number of affirmative votes shall prevail, in conformity with section 9123 of the Elections Code.

Section 5. Sample Ballot. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk is instructed to print the entire proposed Ordinance in the sample ballot.

Section 6. Consolidation. The election called by this Resolution shall be consolidated with the other elections conducted by the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk to be held in the County of Los Angeles on June 2, 2026, and the measure shall be placed on the same ballot in the order set forth in this Resolution. The precincts, polling places, vote centers, precinct board members, election workers, and facilities shall be the same as provided for the June 2, 2026, statewide primary election.

Section 7. Authority. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to sections 10403 and 12001 of the Elections Code and section 25201 of the Government Code. The Executive Officer-Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is ordered to file a copy of this Resolution with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk at least eighty-eight (88) days prior to the day of the election. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk is authorized, 8 HOA.105763538.16
instructed, and directed to prepare any documents and take any additional actions that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

Section 8. California Environment Quality Act. Based upon all of the facts before it on this matter, the Board of Supervisors finds that the submission of the measure to the voters is not subject to, or is exempt from, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Submission of the measure is not a project as defined by California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15378(b)(4) because it relates to the creation of government funding mechanisms, which do not involve commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:

The foregoing resolution was on the ___ day of _____ 2026, adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts, agencies, and authorities for which said Board so acts.

EDWARD YEN
Executive Officer
Board of Supervisors
By: __________________________
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON
County Counsel
By: _________________________

EVA CHU
Senior Deputy County Counsel
9 SHARE THIS: Date Published: 02/09/2026 09:00 PM
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1768
AB-1768 Transactions and use taxes: County of Los Angeles. (2025-2026)

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Introduced by Assembly Member Bryan
February 09, 2026
An act to add and repeal Chapter 3.85 (commencing with Section 7294.7) of Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1768, as introduced, Bryan. Transactions and use taxes: County of Los Angeles.

Existing law authorizes various local governmental entities, subject to certain limitations and approval requirements, to levy a transactions and use tax for general or specific purposes, in accordance with the procedures and requirements set forth in the Transactions and Use Tax Law, including a requirement that the combined rate of all taxes that may be imposed in accordance with that law in any county not exceed 2%.

This bill would authorize, until December 31, 2031, the County of Los Angeles, by an ordinance adopted by the county, to levy a tax pursuant to the Transactions and Use Tax Law at a rate not to exceed 0.5% for general and special purposes, subject to voter approval, as specified. The bill would authorize those taxes to exceed the 2% limit described above.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.

Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: no Local Program: no THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 3.85 (commencing with Section 7294.7) is added to Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read:

CHAPTER 3.85. County of Los Angeles Transactions and Use Tax Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites 3/26/26, 3:29 PM Bill Text - AB-1768 Transactions and use taxes: County of Los Angeles. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1768 1/2 10 7294.7. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, the County of Los Angeles may impose a transactions and use tax for general or specific purposes to support countywide programs at a rate of no more than 0.5 percent that would, in combination with all taxes imposed in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law (Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251)), exceed the limit established in Section 7251.1, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The county adopts an ordinance proposing the transactions and use tax by any applicable voting approval requirement.
(2) The ordinance proposing the transactions and use tax is submitted to the electorate and is approved by the voters voting on the ordinance by the applicable voting approval requirement in accordance with Article XIII C of the California Constitution.
(3) The transactions and use tax conforms to the Transactions and Use Tax Law (Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251)), other than Section 7251.1.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 7251.1, a transactions and use tax rate imposed pursuant to subdivision (a) shall not be considered for purposes of the combined rate limitation established by Section 7251.1. (c) If, as of December 31, 2031, an ordinance proposing a transactions and use tax has not been approved in the County of Los Angeles as authorized by subdivision (a), this chapter shall be repealed.

SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique fiscal pressures being experienced in the County of Los Angeles in providing essential programs that have been caused, at least in part, by federal funding cuts. 3/26/26, 3:29 PM Bill Text - AB-1768 Transactions and use taxes: County of Los Angeles. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1768 2/2 11